HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 04/10/1973 EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL
Tuesday, April 10, 1973 7:30 p.m., Village Hall
INVOCATION - - - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - - - ROLL CALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Paul Redpath, Joan Meyers,John McCulloch,
Wolf Penzel, Roger Boerger
COUNCIL STAFF: Finance Director John Frane;Village Attorney
Harlan Perbix; Clerk Edna Holmgren
AGENDA
I. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING HELD MARCH 27, 1973.
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. "Westwind',single family plat located in Preserve. Request for
Rezoning to RM 6.5 for 78 lots and Preliminary Nat Approval.
(Report attached)
Action: 1. First reading of Ordinance No. 215 approving reclassification
to RM 6.5 for 78 lots.
2. Motion adopting Resolution No. 680 approving Preliminary
Plat, "Westwind".
B. Cherrywood Apartments, New Town Development. Request for
Rezoning to RM 2.5 for 24 acre site. (Report attached)
Action: 1. First reading of Ordinance No. 217 approving reclassification
to RM 2.5 for 24 acre site.
C. Edenvale 7th Addition, 2achnan Homes, Inc., clustered single
family plat in Edenvale. Request Rezoning to RM 6.5 and Preliminary
Plat Approval for single family homes. (Report attached)
Action: No action will occur at this meeting.
III. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS:
A. Request of Rosemount. Inc- to issue Municipal Industrial Develop-
ment Bonds. (Report attached)
Action: Motion adoptinggesolution ,go. 683 - $1,500,000 Municipal
Industrial Development Bonds, Rosemount, Inc. - giving
Preliminary Approval to a Project under the Municipal Industrial
Development Act, Referring the proposal to the Dept.of Economic
Development for approval, and authorizing preparation of neces-
sary documents.
i
Council Agenda
April 10, 1973
Page 2
N. RESOLUTIONS &ORDINANC ES:
A. Second Reading-Ordinance No. 214. An ordinance approving
reclassification of Mill Creek First Phase from District Rural to
RM 6.5 for 12 acre parcel. (Attached)
Action: Motion approving Second Reading of Ordinance No. 214.
B. $Pnnnd Reading-Ordinance No. 205. An ordinance approving
reclassification of Dienvale 6th Addition from District Rural to
RM 6.5 according to the plan submitted for single family lots
averaging 13,500 sq. ft. in area.
Action: Motion approving Second Reading of Ordinance No. 205.
V. REPORTS OF OFFICERS,BOARDS, AND COMMIS.rONS
A. Report by Mr. iosesh Ries. Scott County Administrator. concerning
legislative bill 18-169 Toll Bridge.
Action:
B. Retort of City Attorney concerning Metro Sewer Lawsuit.
Action:
C. Report of Finance Director concerning Water and Sewer Billing. (Att.)
Action:
D. Report of Village Engineer;
Final Plat Approval for Creekwood Estates. Plat located north of
Co. Rd. 1 and east of Creek Knoll Road. (Report attached)
Action: Motion adopting Be solution No. 685 approving Creekwood Estates
Final Plat.
E. Report of Village Clerk:
Village Clerk's recommended License Application List. (Attached)
Action: Motion approving License Application List dated 4/10/73.
VI. FINANCES;
A. Payment of Claims No. 1709 — 1773. (Attached)
Action: Motion approving payment of Claims No. 1709- 1773.
B. Cash and Investment Report. (Attached)
Action: Motion accepting Cash and Investment Report,
VII. ADJOURNMENT
. r
MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE VIT.i.AGE COUNCIL
Tuesday, April 10, 1973 7:30 P.M.,Village Hall
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Paul Redpath, Councilmen John McCulloch, Wolfgang
Penzel and Roger Boerger and Councilwoman, Joan Meyers.
COUNCIL STAFF: Village Attorney, W. Harlan Perbix, Acting Manager, John
Frene, Clerk, Edna M. Holmgren.
I. HOWES OF REGULAR MEETING HELD MARCH 27, 1973
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to approve the minutes of March 27th
as published with the following addition:
Page 2, Paragraph 1. Sentence 3. The staff was instructed to publicize
through service clubs, mailings, etc.
With this addition, Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. "Westwind' - The Preserve. First Reading, Ordinance No. 215, Reclass-
classification to RN 6.5 for 78 Lots. Preliminary Plat Approval.
Resolution No. 680. ! I /y`
Dick Putnam, Village Planner and Mr. ttA A(La _, kL ak
presented and reviewed "Westwind" a single family plat located in The
Preserve, north of the Windslope project. Mr. Putnam related that this
subdivision of approximately 78 to 80 single family detached lots would
offer housing choices in the mid-$30,000 price range. He also stated
that old Franlo Road could be utilized as a major pedestrian walkway
within The Preserve and grouping significant open spaces adjacent to
Old Franlo Road would be an excellent concept for this single family
area. Because of the foiling character of the site a variety of housing
types could be provided.
There being no further discussion, Mr. Boerger made a notion to close
the hearing and ado-t the first reading of Ordinance No. 215 reclassify-
ing Westwind from Rural to District RM 6.5. Mr. Penzel seconded. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to adopt Resolution No.680, preliminary
plat for Westwind including the Planning Ccaemission reccsmendations of
April 3rd, 1 through 4. Mr. Panel seconded. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
B. Cherrywood Apartments. New Town Development. Rezoning from Rural
to RM 2.5 on 24 Acre Site. First Reading, Ordinance No. 217.
����"
Dick Putnam, Village Planner and Mr. "44.1 � f� , • ate...,w te
presented and reviewed the Cherrywood Apartment project located 4 blocks
south of Highway 5 on the east side of Mitchell Road, on a 24 acre site -•-G!,e4
with 272 rental units . The apartments will be rental mitts, consist of
8 unit modules attached in townhouse fashion, three stories high with
Council Meeting
April 10, 1973
Page Two
tuck-under garages. All units will have semi-private front entrances
Mr. Doug Johnson described the exterior design as Spanish with a pitched
roof with reddish shingles, spanish stucco, brick arches, curved window
shutters and flower boxes. Mr. Putnam reviewed the realignment of
Scenic Heights Road/Mitchell Road at the intersection.
There being no further discussion, Mr. Penzel made a motion to close
the hearing and adopt the first reading of Ordinance No. 217 including
the Planning Commission recommendations of March 20th, 2 through 8
deleting number 7. Mrs. Meyers seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
C. Edenvale 7th Addition. Zacbman Homes, Inc. Rezoning to RM 6.5 and
Preliminary Plat Approval.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to continue this hearing to April 24th.
Mrs. Meyers seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
III. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS:
A. Request of Rosemount, Inc, to Issue Municipal Industrial Development
Bonds.
tiO1A4. 'a their
Mr. Pete 1141.4 , Rosemount, Inc. presented iia[ request for
MIDB's to be used for an expansion of 75,000 square feet to their
plat on West 78th Street. Representative, of Payne Weber Jackson were
also present.
John Franc, Finance Director stated that there was one difference from
the Crown Auto application. Their building will be used as security,
Rosemount would not be required to furnish this. He noted that the
project will benefit both the Village and Rosemount and that in his
opinion it was an excellent company with a proven record of success.
Mr. McCulloch asked what the tax revenue would be with the increased
operations, Mr. Frane replied that he hadn't figured it out as yet.
Mr. Frane added that he had gone over the Dun and Bradstreet report
and Rosemount's financial statement and found them exaedlat very
satisfactory.
There being no further questions and/or comments, Mr. Boerger made a
motion to adopt Resolution No. 683 giving preliminary approval to a
project under the Muricipal Industrial Development Act, referring the
proposal to the Department of Economic Development for approval and
authorizing preparation of necessary documents. Mr. Penzel seconded.
All voted aye. Motion carried.
IV. RESOLUTIONS & ORDINANCES
A. Second Reading, Ordinance No. 214. Mill Creek -First Phase.
Rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to adopt the second reading of Ordinance
No. 214 and order published. Mr. Boerger seconded. All voted aye.
Motion carried.
Council Meeting
April 10, 1973
Page Three
B. Second Reading, Ordinance No. 205. Edenvale 6th Addition.
Reclassification from District Rural to RM 6.5.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to adopt the second reading of Ordinance
No. 205 and order published. Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
V. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMNIISSIONS
A. Report by Mr. Jose. Ries Scott Count Administrator,Concern'
Legislative Bill-1:-1.9 Toll Bridge.
Mayor Redpath reviewed the bill concerning a toll bridge across the
Minnesota River to accomiodate Highway 18 and 169. Hea related
t the dathatlhe
had spent time on Monday the 9th
redrafting the bill with Hennepin and Scott County and the Minnesota
River Authority. He stated that he felt that the concept of the bill
was favorable, but that the time schedule was not to Eden Prairie's
advantage
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to delegate the Village Engineer,
Mr. Jullie to represent Eden Prairie on Friday April 13th at the
Capitol to express the Council's opposition to the bridge and state
the following reasons: the timing is not right for Eden Prairie,
upgrading of County Road 18 is doubtful and the impact on Anderson
Lakes. Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. Motion
B. Report of Village Attorney Concerning Metro Sewer Lawsuit.
Harlan Perbix, Village Attorney reviewed the content of the Metro Sewer
lawsuit. He recommended that the Village do nothing at this time, we
will be a defendant in 30 days. He stated that he will advise the Council
of the progress of the suit.
C. Report of Finance Director Concerning Water and Sewer Billing.
Finance Director, John Frane related to the Council that the Village
will begin billing for water and sewer in about three weeks. A
minimum of$2.50 for sewer and$3.50 for water will be used as stated
in Ordinance No. 165. Residents will be requested to read their meters
and return to the Village office for billing. Mr. Frane stated that
he anticipated a considerable saving in reading costs with this method.
D. Report of Village Engineer: 1st Addition.
Final Plat Approval of Creekwood Estates,/ Resolution No.685.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to adopt Resolution No. 685 approving
final Plat for Creekwood Estates, 1st Addition with the recce nendation
by the Village Attorney to request a deed to Outlot C for park purposes.
Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
R o of Vi e Clerk:
A mots w m y Mrs. s to he Vi a Cle is/ el
=tended cemse,�'appli ation st - Mt.
seconded. All voted rye. Mot arried.
_ 1
Council Feting
April 10, 1973
Page Foul
E. Report of Village Clerk:
Village Clerk's Recomaended License Application List.
A motion was made by Mrs.Meyers to approve the Village Clerk's
recc mended license application list dated April 10th. Mr. Penzel
seconded.. All voted aye. Motion carried.
VI. FINANCES
A. Payment of Claims No. 1709 through 1773.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to approve claims number 1709 through
1773 for payment. Mrs. Meyers seconded. On roll call, all voted aye.
Motion carried.
B. Cash &Investment Report.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to accept the Cash & Investment report
dated March 31, 1973. Mr.Boerger seconded. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
AGENDA ADDITION
A motion was made by Mrs.Meyers to instruct the Village Manager to
draft a resolution to the Metropolitan Airports Commission in regard
to the Village Council's concern about the numerous plane crash fatalities
this past year. Mr. McCulloch seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk
1
' --=- : .3,(b / / ,c„ t4LA.L.,.eX.e_) .74/6_
1 ,. . 11 '
i
i� 7.ti�. „,) — 77�,
/: 04/-14 -11.,,t-41- ,, Lc 77)/e_ :
-1, l ° 10 ', ,n/� i
a E - * .,/_ 3: 73 i- -r4
i
Cib,‘,J)
7 C-t1.e2Zc tic, art) ,
f'cj, 1 Lt /d4---Licu.Al
t.A.,, ak.fr ,-74-z.---Z-2-0,>-Y% '2-'7 *CYL-4-.4.4.i
ii / ,.(/, -,.,,".�_ 6 D „, . - A.e, _
g. vc.e,_,(€_ Fe_ a— k do . .,-; # 7
0- 6� /- ,
. 6 .G85
L-17)4-e,-u - Cn,e- -6-0 uL.K-,2 ate,
7C.(v...- .te,241-AA-/dr4,4.44,-rt,
..44.4. .41 Goo .�� �e � c-*-' ff . ti
�/
.. . .... .
G
oco
C5`o 0 0 t i 1-— c ,-7 75 —zr‘j -
{ ik.6,7,.' — U?tic et-11-- '-rY, &Gal,'71 — `K,s.4._.ti,) i 4
U
. tre(rt:',A-P -...4-4-11.6...i"
'Gf-"t-.2--L `ft..-71,1 /C''‘.1"..."-t."1 ".."..
kt Ac. 73/4_
.-i-j:. /74 ....,,,,z. „2,,e,..
,D, ,,,,e,,,,, ,„„...,..). '77;ye___,
Lq2) '71,1 7° 'VD-5- .)„,,se. -
4tie:i., —1-i �0 te..c,..cQ— `r u.z— AL...,fin, 0 , --
_r e.-E l`ll(.yam c f a.Q U-n.- `7rz-0n,e - - ,Q t,.. -
-ii-,_ri-U 4 ,;e-,4 - ,ems 0 --
/ao ,Zo - if - :o a
H0•
- E Z .ece t -L
i
itt- o-rvirt4 sQa)-
k �.e�.�,,, � �.� ern fe. � ,
,Low. � - •
(L.4)
you 4
-mac.,..- 7 �-�
_ art..)
z -
Lµ t�ry u rrteul�J -
,tine '
0
:6_ -,y2/70 ,;(444,t--'
Q -
'for— i-772
/5r341 -
1 6-7n .4)4 ,rey E.__
1.
041,
I
IMINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL
Tuesday, March 27, 1973 7:30 P.M., Village Hall
COUNCIL MEIBERS: Mayor Paul Redpath, Councilmen John McCulloch,
llolfgang Penzel and Roger Boerger and Councilwoman, (—
Joan Meyers.
COUNCIL STAFF: Village Manager, Robert P. Heinrich, Village Attorney
Keith Sirens and Clerk, Edna M. Ilolmgren.
I. MINUTES OF REGULAR MIEETING HELD MARCH 13, 1973.
A motion was made by Hr. Penzel to approve the minutes of March 13th
with the following correction:
Reports of Officers, Boards & Commissions: (A), Page 4. Mr. Redpath
reported that in the near future the Hennepin County League might be
disbanded and efforts,etc.
i1ith this correction I1r. Boerger seconded. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
II. PRESENTATION OF CONTRIBUTION FROM EDEN PRAIRIE. JAYCEES. Door Decals and
Uniform Patches for Public Safety Department.
Mr. Gerald ilielenberg, Jaycees President, presented a check to the
Public Safety Director in the amount of S300 to be used for door
decals and uniform patches. Pictures were taken of the presentation
with the Jaycees and Public Safety Dept. members. The Mayor thanked
Mr. Nielenberg on behalf of the Council for their interest in the
Public Safety Department.
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Public Hearing on Housing Task Force Report. Presented by Mrs.
Sonja Anderson.
Mrs. Anderson presented the Housing Task Force Report and a proposal
to hold a meeting viith residents in Eden Prairie at the Prairie View
School or some other location in one of the schools. She suggested
that a mailing be sent to all residents, locations set for them to
pick up copies of the Housing Task Force Report, possibly through the
schools. She noted that perhaps slides and group discussions could
be used at the meeting.
firs. Meyers suggested that members of the Housing Task Force reactivate
public development because of the Federal subsidy stoppage. The Mayor
stated that he would like to see adoption of a Housing Policy for Eden
Prairie. fir. McCulloch cormented that he was not satisfied with the
report, he felt that there was too much of it devoted to subsidized
housing. The Manager suggested flay 3rd as a possible date for the
• meeting and advised the Task Force to contact service clubs, etc. in
the community as well as residents. ��
•
COUNCIL MINUTES
March 27, 1973
Page 2
A motion was made by lir. Penzel to set flay 3rd as a meeting date at ytr
either the Eden Prairie High School cafetorium or the Prairie View ��
School. The staff was instructed to publicize through service clubs.
It. Boerger seconded. Ali voted aye. Motion carried.
B. Mill Creek. Hustad Development Corporation. PUD Concept Plan.
Resolution No. 668. First Readingt Ordinance ho. 214. Reclassification
from District Rural to Ri 6.5. Pr lininary Plat Approval, First Phase,
Resolution No. 669.
Village Planner, Dick Putnam and Bill Bonner, Hustad Development Company
reviewed and presented the Hill Creek proposal. The project is located
in southeastern Eden Prairie in the area identified as the Bluffs Hest
Sector. Mr. Bonner reviewed the concept plan for the 32 acre site
southeasterly of Homeward Hills Road and County Road I11. Preliminary
plans for a small commercial area at the intersection of these two roads
are not included in the plan at this time. 65 townhouse units are pro-
posed with It units in the first phase.
iV
Mrs. fieyers asked when the engineering problem in regard to curb and
gutters would be resolved, fir. Putnam replied that it would be before
the final plat is approved.
Hr. McCulloch commended Village Engineer, Carl Jullie for his reports
submitted to the Council on this project.
1. A motion was made by firs. Meyers to close the hearing and
adopt Resolution Ito. 668 approving the PUD Concept Plan for
11111 Creek with Planning and Zoning recommendations 1 through
4 of Miarch 6, 1973. Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted aye.
Motion carried.
2. A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to adopt the first reading of
Ordinance Mo. 214 approving reclassification from District
Rural to 11116.5 for 12 acre parcel of land with Planning
Commission reconriendations 1 through 4 and satisfactory
settlement of engineering problems with Village Engineer.
Mir. Boerger seconded. All voted aye. !lotion carried.
3. A motion was made by firs. Meyers to adopt Resolution No. 669,
preliminary plat approval, Mill Creek, 1st Phase Cluster, ltib
units. fir. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. Notion carried.
C. Eden Land Corporation. Zachnan Homes, Edenvale 7th Addition.
A motion was made by Mir. Penzel to set April 10, 1973 at 7:30 p.m.,
as a hearing date for Zachman Homes, Edenvale 7th Addition. lir.
Boerger seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
•
COUNCIL MINUTES
March 27, 1973
Page 3
IV. RESOLUTIONS A ORDINANCES
A. Second Reading,Ordinance ilo, 211. Creating A Establishing Fire
Zones.
A motion was made by Fir. Penzel to adopt the second reading of Ordinance
No. 211 and order published. Mrs. Meyers seconded. All voted aye.
Motion carried.
B. Second Reading,Ordinance No. 212. Anending Ordinance No. 43.
tiel 1 s.
A motion was made by Fir. Boerger to adopt the second reading of
Ordinance No. 212 and order published. firs. Meyers seconded. All voted
aye. Notion carried.
C. Second Reading,Ordinance No, 202. Licensing and Regulating the
Use and Sale of Intoxicating Liquor.
A motion was made by Fir. Penzel to adopt the second reading of Ordinance
No. 202 and order published with the following addition:
Page 9, Subd. 7, At the time of each original application for
a license or application for a change in ownership or
control of corporation, except in the case of, etc.
Uith this addition,Mr. McCulloch seconded. All voted aye unanimously.
Motion carried.
A motion was made by lir. Penzel to establish the policy that no action
will be taken on licenses to be issued until 120 days after publication
of Ordinance Po. 202, Firs. Meyers seconded. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
D. Resolution No. 667. Requesting Minnesota State Legislature to
Adopt Legislation Authorizing Reniburserient to Municipalities
of Costs Incurred in Relocating Utilities on All State Trunk
Highways.
A motion was made by fir. McCulloch to adopt Resolution No. 667. Firs.
Meyers seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
E. Resolution No. 670. Requesting the State of Minnesota and Hennepin
County to Reduce the Speed Limit on County Road 04 to 40 liiles per
Hour and Providing a Blinking Morning Light at the Intersection of
County Road #4 and Valley View Road.
A motion was made by firs. Meyers to adopt Resolution No. 670. fir,
McCulloch seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
F. Resolution No. 671. Informing Honart Development Company of the
Village of Eden Prairie's Intention to Provide Utilities and Roads
to the Proposed Regional Shopping Center.
COUNCIL MINUTES
March 27. 1973
Page 4
A motion was made by fir. Penzel to adopt Resolution Ho. 671.
Mrs. Meyers seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
G. Resolution No. 672. Increasing the Compensation of the
Village Manager;75 per Month Based Upon Review of his
Performance After a Period of Six Months According to
the Original Hiring Agreement.
A motion was made by tars. Meyers to adopt Resolution Ho. 672.
fir. Boerger seconded. On roll call. all voted aye. Motion
carried.
H. Resolution No. 673. Authorizing Mayor and Village Manager
to Enter into an Agreement to Acquire Approximately 71e Acres
of Land Adjacent to and I!est of Prairie View School for Park
Purposes in an Amount not to Exceed $22,500.
A motion was made by Mr. IcCul loch to adopt Resolution No. 673.
Mr. Penzel seconded, On roll call. all voted aye. Motion carried.
V. PETITIONS, REQUESTS A COIIIUIIICATIONS
A. D. H. Gustafson& Associates Inc. Requesting Storm Sewer
Extension to St. John's Hood.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to receive the letter dated
March 15, 1973 requesting storm sewer extension for St. John's
Hood and order feasibility study. Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted
aye. lotion carried.
B. Petition Received from Residents of Barberry Lane, Padon Drive.
and Peterborg Drive Requesting Feasibility Study and a Public
Hearing for the Purpose of Determining the Cost of Paving.
Their Street.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to receive the petition from
residents on Padon Drive. Barberry Lane. and Peterborg Drive, order
a feasibility report and set Anril 24, 1973 as a hearing date for
the str-et paving project, Mgr. Penzel seconded. /lotion carried.
C. Letter Dated /larch 1 5, 1973 from Minnesota Highway Department in
Reference to State Highway Department's Participation on the
Ring Route and Improvements to T.H. 169. 212. 49A.
Discussion was held in regard to this problem, the Village Manager
stated that he had gone about as far as he could administratively.
the Mayor suggested that the Village draft a bill to present to the
legislature so Eden Prairie can get help. He offered to set up a meet-
ing in the Governor's office with Council approval. The Village
Manager stated that he was meeting with the Highway Department soon.
No action was taken.
1
e
COUNCIL MINUTES
March 27, 1973
Page 5
VI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COITIISSIONS
A. Report of Public Safety Director I Fire Chief. Annual Report of
tden Prairie Volunteer Fire Department.
Public Safety Director, Jack Hacking reviewed his first report on the
Fire Department. He cormended Asst. Chief, Gene Jacobson for conducting
training sessions in the community, reviewed projects the department
would like to consider in the future and thanked both Chief, Ray Mitchell
and Asst. Chief Gene Jacobson for their past year's service. Ray Mitchell
then read the annual report of the Department and asked the Council to
make sure when plans are reviewed in multiple units that adequate streets,
exits and entrances are provided for the fire equipment. Mayor Redpath
thanked him on behalf of the Council for the excellent service provided
by the Eden Prairie Fire Department.
B. Report of Finance Director. Progress of LOGIS.
John Frame, Finance Director reviewed the background of LOGIS,
Local Government Information System. the progress to date and
what to expect next. Me stated that one of the LOGIS municipalities
will begin using the system for payroll about the middle of this
year on a pilot basis. The Village of Eden Prairie will then begin
training personnel in the use of the system. lie then stated that
after bids are received, evaluated and contracts for computers and
systems are awarded and installed, each municipality will be in a
position to automate payroll, utility billing and general ledger
procedures as rapidly as it is able.
C. Reports of Village Attorney.
1. Proposed Metropolitan Rate Authority to Regulate N.S.P.
Electric Service in the Metropolitan Area.
Village Attorney, Keith Simons reviewed the Concept Plan in the
7 metro areas to regulate N.S.P. electric service rates similar
to Minneapolis Gas Co. Village lianager, lir. Heinrich recommended
this plan..
A motion was made by lir. Penzel to approve the Manager's recommendation
to accept the concept plan, N.S.P. electric service rates. Mr. Redpath
seconded. All voted aye. tbtion carried.
2. Trunk Sewer Assessment Appeal to the District Court by lir. Karl
H_ Krahl.
Village Attorney. Keith Simons reviewed the Notice of Appeal - Special
Assessments by tir. Karl H. Krahl, tie action was needed.
COUNCIL MINUTES
March 27, 1973 -
Page 6
3. Crestwood Terrace. Alex Dorenkemper's Request for Final Plat
Approval.
A motion was riade by fir. Boerger to direct the Village Attorney to
inform Mr. Dorenkenper to re-submit the preliminary plat of Maplewood
Park Estates to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation.
I4m.Peeri_ct: Messrs Penzel, Coerger, McCulloch and Redpath voted aye.
firs, Meyers voted no. Motion carried.
D. Reports of Village Engineer.
1. Final Plat Approval for Valley Knolls Addition. Resolution No.
674.
A motion ivas made by Mir. Penzel to adopt Resolution Mo. 674 approval
of the final plat of Valley Knolls Addition. fir. Merger seconded.
All voted aye. Motion carried.
2. Final Plat Approval. High Point 2nd Addition. Resolution
67L.
A motion was made by lir. Boerger to adopt Resolution No. 675 approving
the final plat of High Point 2nd Addition, fir. Penzel seconded. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
3. Approval of Plans and Specifications. Extension of Trunk and
Lateral llatermains for Rosemount Engineering. Resolution Flo. 676.
Projects TR 72-8-23 and 72-8-24.
A motion uas made h'i Mr. Penzel to adopt Resolution No. 676 a,proving
plans and specs for projects I1TR 72-8-23 and 72-8-24. firs. Meyers
seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
Village Manager, Mr. Heinrich reported to the Council that Rosemount, Inc.
had requested Municipal Bonds information.
4. Revised Traffic Signal Maintenance Agreement with Minnesota
Highway Department for Signals at T.H.15 and Co. Rd. 44,
Resolution Ho. 677.
A notion was made by fir. Boerger to adopt Resolution No. 677 amending
Cooperative Agreement No. 56449 to provide for reimbursable maintenance
on signals at T.H. #5 and Co. Rd. #4. fir, Penzel seconded. All voted
ave. Motion carried.
5. Ajproval of Plans and Specifications for Improvements in the
Red Rock Planning Sector. Resolution ffo. 678.
1. Construction of trunk watermain in Scenic Heights Road
from Mitchell Road west to Hiavatha Ave. Project 72-8-21.
2. Construction of Atherton Road including necessary eater and
storm sewer lines from Mitchell Road easterly to proposed
East/Nest Parkway. Project 72.9-17.
COUNCIL MINUTES
March 27, 1973
Page 7
3. Regarding, paving, construction of curb and gutter and
storm sewer in the existing Mitchell Road right-of—way
from intersection of Scenic Heights Road and Mitchell
Road south to the south line of Section 15. Project
72-3-20.
• A motion was made by Mrs. I1eyeq'tyadopt Resolution No. 670 approving
plans and specifications, r^.^W gEE for bidding and ordering
advertisement for bids on April 19th at 11 o'clock a.m. with Council
consideration on April 24th at 7:30 o'clock p.m. Mr. Penzel seconded.
All voted aye. Motion carri ed.
6, Authorization for Mayor and Village Manager to Enter into an
Agreement with Brown A KeTTyy for Easement Acquisition under
Project 72-1-12[TTfne (tile 1AT Sanitary Sewer Extension.
Resolution No. 679.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to adopt Resolution No. 679 authorizing
the Mayor and Village Manager to sign an agreement with Brown and Kelly
and instruct the Manager and Village Attorney to clarify Item 8. Mrs.
Meyers seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
E. Reports of Director of Parks and Recreation. Purgatory Creek
Open Space Planning Study.
The Park & Recreation Director reviewed the Purgatory Creek Open
Space Planning Study. The Manager stated that there was a lack
of contour mapping in the Village. that most of what we have has
been done by the developers when plats have been submitted.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to accept the proposal of Brauer
and Associates to perform Open Space Planning for Purgatory Creek in
the amount not to exceed $12.500 to be equally shared with Riley—
Purgatory Creek Watershed Di strict and authorize necessary two foot
contour base mapping of the study area in the amount not to exceed
$11,500. Mrs. Meyers seconded. On roll call, all voted aye. Motion
carried.
F. Reports of Village (tanager.
1. Authorization to (lire a Landscape Architect in the Area of
Planning and Park Development at Salary in Range of $750-900
per month.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to authorize the Manager to hire a
Landscape Architect at a sal ary range of 5750-900 per month. Mr. Penzel
seconded. On roll call, all voted aye. Motion carried.
•
COUNCIL MINUTES
March 27, 1973
Page 8
2. Master Labor Agreement and Supplement Labor Agreement. Between
Village of Eden Prairie and International Union of Operating—
Engineers, Local Ho, 49.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers approving the Labor Agreement and Supple-
mental Labor Agreement with International Union of Operating Engineers,
Local No. 49. lir. McCulloch seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
3. Letter of Commendation Received from the Eden Prairie School
for Public Safety Officer Keith Hall.
The Manager reviewed a letter received from the Eden Prairie Schools
dated March 15, 1973 commending Keith taall for services provided the
school. He recommended placing it on file.
4. Discussion of 18-169 Minnesota River Toll Bridge Authority
Proposed Legislation.
The Manager urged the Council to attend this meeting on March 29th.
The Manager informed the Council that he would be going on vacation
for three weeks, returning on April 24th.
5. (Added to Agenda) Notice to Municipalities and Townships
District Court. Fourth Judicial District. Court File No. 690532.
The Manager reviewed a notice to municipalities and townships of a
lawsuit pending in the Fourth Judicial District, County of Hennepin,
State of Minnesota. entitled "The City of Brooklyn Center, et al, vs.
The Metropolitan Council. et al." On October 12, 1972, the Metropolitan
Council adopted a resolution, which resolution approved a method of
allocating to municipalities the current costs of reserved capacity in
the metropolitan disposal system. The aforementioned lawsuit is seeking
to have that resolution declared invalid and void for numerous reasons.
No action was needed.
G. Village Clerk Report. Recommended License Application List Dated
}larch 27, 1973.
A motion was made by lir. Penzel to approve the Clerk's recommended
license application list date (larch 27th. fir. Boerger seconded. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
VII. FINANCES
A. Payment of Claims Mo. 1642 through 1708.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to approve payment of claims no. 1642
through 1708. fir. Penzel seconded. On roll call, all voted aye. Motion
carried.
Meeting adjourned at 11:30 P.M. tdna N. Holmgren. Clerk
4/3773 Planning Commission Meeting
C. "Westwind" single farrily plat located in Preserve. Commission
action, revised Engineer's report.
Mr.Close, the Windslope architect, stated that he felt the plat
to be a good total plan between Westwind and Windslope.
To accommodate the movement of the North/South Parkway, Mr.
Peterson indicated Eden Land Corp.'s willingness to dedicate up
to 33 ft. if buildable property did not have to be sacrificed. Mr.
Carter indicated that the 80 ft. roadway could be worked out
between The Preserve and Eden Land Corp. with no cost to the
Village.
Action Taken• A motion was made by Mr. Casey and seconded by
Mr. Brown to recommend preliminary plat approval of the 78 lot
Westwind single family detached home site and recommend rezoning
to RM 6.5 based on the following:
1. The staff Planning report of March 19, 1973.
2. The Engineering report dated March 30, 1973.
3. The solution of road alignment and dedication prior to final
plat approval.
4. The solution of drainage agreement between Edenvale and
the Preserve prior to final plat approval.
Motion carried unanimously.
5-4".
3/20/73 Planning Commission
D. °tlestwinds" by The Preserve, a single plat located north of the
ilindslope project. Staff Report.
The Engineering and Staff reports were explained by lir. Putnam.
lir. Casey expressed his concern regarding the'Andslope and nroposed
school site. fir. Carter of The Preserve said that the land south
of tiestwinds was being held open for t!indslope and that the land area
to adjacent to tlestwinds had been dedicated to park and schools.
Action Taken:
lir. Casey suggested tabling any action until April 3 with the public
hearing set for April 10.
I,I
3/6/73 Planning Commission
C. Westwind, single family detached plat proposed by The Preserve
located along old Franlo Road north of llindslope.
Hr. Don !less made the presentation speaking briefly on the
design alternatives. The design layout in the north area is
firm but alternates are being investigated on the southerly area
adjacent to llindslope. A meeting of the developers is scheduled
for iarch 8, 1973, to resolve some of the questions.
Action Taken:
Referral of the proposal was made and a report and recommendations
requested.
I .'
•
r
PLANNING STAFF REPORT
Pro ject: Westwind
Applicant: The Preserve
Location: In The Preserve north of the Windslope project, located
centrally in The Preserve area.
Request: RM 6.5 Zoning for single family detached homes and
Preliminary Plat Approval for 78 lots, approximate size
8,400 sq. ft. on 26.8 acres, to be developed at a
density of 2.9 dwelling units per acre.
Date: March 19, 1973
From: Dick Putnam, Planner
Thru: R. P. Heinrich, Village Manager
OUTLINE:
1. Compatibility with Preserve mncept.
2. Relationship with Adjacent Uses.
3. Subdivision Standards.
4. Recommendations.
1. Compatibility with Preserve Concept:
The revised Preserve Concept Plan, which moved the major North/South
Parkway arterial to the west of the property adjacent to the lowland and
in its place substituted a collector street running next to the school site
and park. Also changed was the area devoted to recorational, religious
center, and school use by the inclusiong of an approximately 6 acre parcel
on the northeastern quadrant of the parkway and this new collector road.
A revision in the original Concept Plan is to develop a major recreational/
limited scale shopping facility south of the parkway adjacent to Neill
Lake, to include a pool, small gymnasium, handball, paddleball, and
outdoor tennis court facilities with locker room s. Also would be included
social meeting space, perhaps in toe old barns, as well as development
of limited neighborhood scale commercial operations.
To the north of the parkway would be developed a religious center site,
perhaps ecumenical or single church development, which would share
parking with the proposed elementary school site adjacent to The Preserve
22 acre park. The spine of public or quasi-public activities from Neill
Lake north to the elementary school seems to make a great deal of sense.
To make this function safely, the movement of the North/Southateriai
to the west was necessary. I believe that this revision in concept is
excellent and will produce a true social/commercial core for this
neighborhood of Tho Preserve, to serve the 15,000 people, if combined
sensitively with the smaller nodes related to individual housing sites.
Westwind
Page 2
The Westwind single family units seem to work very well with the revised
plan, having single family units in close proximity to the recreational areas
of Neill Lai:e and the elementary school, accessible by a major trail system
and following the old Franlo Road alignment with a grade crossing at the
proposed North/South collector and old Franlo. If this conning i s handled with adequate signing and pavement markings,cdequate safety would be
provided for the pedestrians crossing to the school/relic;iouscenter.
The Preserve has indicated a desire to provide lots and single family
detached homes in the $35-$40,000 price range to complement the existing
stock of homes in the higher price ranges in lfighpoint and the new lots
proposed in the Basswoods. Six builders have Indicated an interest to
develop these lots with specially designed homes that will fit the smaller
lots with minimum frontages. The relationship of the Westwind single
family homes with the proposed 236 apartments by Minneapolis C haptur
of the American Institute of Architects will seem to be very compatible if
proper design and siting is used.
2. Westwind's Relationship to Adjacent Use s:
The original submission for Westwind with the lineal road running around
the crest of the hill with lots fronting off one side did not take into
consideration the proposed road serving the Westwind apartrcent lrroject,
which steps down the hill to the south. In discussing the road and
physical relationship of the two projects, the developers of the Westwind
project -- the ALA ---felt that their road access was being jeopardized by
moving it into the perking area, as well as being inefficient by providing
a great deal of double frontage lots. Also, the social implications of not
sharing a common access point and providing a wall of private ownership
lots, not allowing pedestrian traffic to move north from the Wind slope
project, did not s0em consistent with integrating the 236 project with the
community. There fore, the three cul-de-sac scheme was arrived atwhich
would utilize the loop road connecting the major North/South arterial
with the collector originally conceived in the, Wind slope project, nerving
the apartments and the three single family cul-de-sacs. There would be
two pedestrian ways running to Franlo Road from the Wincislope project
providing excellent access to the north and the small central play area
as well as the elementary school by crossing on Franlo. 1 believe that
the three cul-de-sac scheme shows a much greater relationship between
the single family units and the Windstorm project through providing
pedestrian connections as well as joint vehicular access.
The northern subdivision which borders on vsncent laud to the north along
the existing fence line row of trees should offer an excellent opportunity
•
Westwind
Page 3
to blend the single family units with a unit style as yet undetermined
in the townhouse variety, using the heavily treed fence line as the
greenway sears between the two projects. The distance between housing •
units, meaning structures facing each other, should be within the range
of 130-160 feet, which would provide en adequate physical separation.
The width and treatment of the greenway along this northern property
line is yet undetermined, but we would encourage the preservation and
enhancement of the existing tree line as a visual buffer as well as a
significant visual landmark in the area.
The northwestern cul-de-sac which will border the North/South Parkway
arterial leaves 140 feet between the back property line of
the units and the road. This distance should allow any berming or
additional planning to be employed to reduce the noise and separate these
units from the major roadway. The exact treatment for this North/South
road is not hk�nown at this point, ranging from a divided parkway similar
to the East vVest Parkway to a two lane major street.
The proximity to the elementary school and religious center site directly
to the east of the minor collector route offers great connection with the
elementary school and community center to the south, across the last/
Vest Parkway through the pedestrian underpass. The connection at Frank)
Road at grade seems workable since the underpass at that location would
he difticult to engineer, given the existing grades.
I I
3. Subdivision Standards:
The construction of moderate size, single family detached homes which
v.'ill generally be of the T or Lvariety, specially designed for the smaller
8,400 sq.ft. lots, seem; toho a workable concept as long as some basic
performance standards rolsitud to subdivision design are followed. These
oteadutrdn are outlinaaiby Nr. Jullie in the Engineering Report, which deals
with lot width at the right—of-way line as well an lot width at the building
setback line which determines your side yard setbacks. The traditional
15 or 20 ft. setbacks et side yards are inappropriate for this style of
housing, with its relationship to the pedestrian and grouped open spaces.
however, it does seem appropriate that certain design standards related to
street and driveway construction must bo maintained. Therefore, I would
urge special consideration of the normal subdivision requirements in
accordance with the Lsgineering Department's reconunandations.
4. Summary and Recommendations:
This subdivision of approximately 78 - 80 single family detached lots
offering housing choices in The Preserve in tho mid-$30,000 price range
will undoubtedly provide the range in housing which today does not exist
•
M �
Westwind
Page 4
in The Preserve for single family detached units. The proximity to the
schools, recreation facilities, and parks is excellent and is far above
any standard within the Metropolitan Area. Likewise, the economic
variety that will he present in the first phase and this area of The Preserve
offers a unique neighborhood to develop,which is uncharacteristic of
most suburban neighborhoods, providing a wide range of housing types
and income mixes. Tho ability to utilize old Franlo Road as a major
pedestriean walkway within The Preserve,which is today surfaced approxi-
mately two-thirds of its length, and grouping significant open spaces
adjacent to old Franlo Road is an excellent concept for this single family
area. The rolling character of this site will offer a natural overlook
character to most of the homesites, which will provide a variety of
housing types, from walkout to split entries to L or T ramblers. With
the recent modifications to the three cul-de-sac scheme and with
conformance with the Village subdivision requirements, it is my opinion
that this will be an excellent, moderate-priced, single family development --
a credit to the Village and to The Preserve.
Recomme ndations:
1. Recommend rezoning to PM 6.5 based solely upon the single family
detached structures proposed in the plan dated March 19, 1973,
with 80 lots indicated of approximately 3,400 sq.ft.
2. Recommend preliminary plot approval be given at the April 3, 1973,
Planning Commission meeting subject to the revised engineering plans
which must be in conformance with the Village Engineering Department's
standards for this subdivision.
3. Recommend to the Village Council that a public hearing be set for
April 10, 1973, for rezoning and preliminary plat approval.
DI'
1 of•
V
.iLLAG!i OF EDEii PRAIRIE •
F1lr,I"1 ERlFG 0RT
Planning << Zoning Ca aission DATE March 30, 1973
.,, is Carl Village fing•ineer
S:JJE:T: Westwind Addition Review of Prel iminary Plat and
Utility Plans dated 30 March 73
LOCATI0N North of E!J Parkway at Franlo Road
OWNER/DEVELOPER The Preserve
Owners Agent: Carter & Gertz
ENGINEER Bather, Ringrose, Wolsfeld (Larry Gardner)
r ** * * ** * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * .** * * * * * * * * * * ** *
P n;:OS i_: The owners have revised the preliminary plat and utility plans for
IiE.STAINO according to the recommendations of the Engineering Report dated _
19 March 1973 and have submitted these to the staff for review. This report
is in reference to those revised plans.
i:!r,:•!_TR?CS: (lot dimensions, easements and right—of-way)
1. Lot areas conform to the proposed RM 6.5 zoning and lot dimensions
indicated are acceptable.
7.. Necessary easements for utility construction are provided.
3. Street R/W widths are adequate.
4 ,
- -2 of 2
Typ ical streetsec
tion stion and grades are shown on the preliminary
plans. Cul-de-sac stree is will he 24' wide, the collector street on the east will }
be _o' wide and the arterial street on the west wi l l be a 20' rural section as a )
temporary first prase of the final urban section. These designs--are acceytabl e.
LTiL ITIES: If the developer chooses to instal 1 islands in the center of
cul-de-sacs, concrete curb and gutter along with adequate drainage facilities shall
be included. Cross drainage at intersections will be carried by concrete valley
gutters.
Sanitary Sewer and Watermain: The proposed sanitary sewer and watennain networks
are acceptable.
Storm'Sewer: ()pen ditch;rg within the pta- has been eliminated and nvprlaad
surface drainage distances are acceptable.
The proposed storm sewer plan is acceptable subject to the following:
1. Receipt of written approval from Eden Land Corp. (0per of adgining property
to the west) concerning resulting increase in drainage across_their [property.
2. Written commitment from the Preserve to maintain the drain tile system__
across the property to the south and also assurance of future storm sewer
• construction across said property at no expense to other upstream properties.
Sanitary Sewer and Waterrra in: The proposed sanitary sewer and watermain networks
are acceptable.
Ccr':'?�Ni):1TICil
Recommend approval of the preliminary plat of WESTWIPIO subject to the
contents of this report.
Respectfu)ilyl bmitted,
Carl J_ e, P.
Village Engineer
1 t • '
' i /,./ \.
_ice i �``
I i / `'• `~
I I
/ t'v� .1.:
r / `f
A
- 1 0 ,'# .. ''‘\/,'::"C
• j
I
} I .
t t\; .?� 7, i i, , rim: ,u ( / /
_ i /) .
/ .- I
I 7 /`Jr i ' I
I
1/ / 14 .
A' ..J.,/, ,........"1......,7 _ _
Y
r\
i •
j 1 .:
a
•
•
r
Y
-. . �...�_._..•--,� .. •.. _ ..._ �..t.r , ,r�4 r. % ...",.r,':�3r�7: .a'��frkt.S.9.4i.«
r
C f
3/20/73 Planning Commission
5. "Atherton ?.partncns
+ „ newT m Deveirpnent located along the propose(;
b
East/'!es t Pario.iy in Red Rock.
Hr. Putnam explained his recorriendat ions and in reply ^r. Doug Johnson
said he felt he could cenpiy if the CootiaiSsion so desired.
Action Ta'�an:
AAoti on ins made by !Ir. belch and s ecerderi by 1 ir. Casey to recommend
rezoning to ie'.i 2.5 for the Atherton A^artnont 24 acre site wit"27Z
rental units suu.]^_ct to compliance with the staff recommendations 2-9
as follows:
�. Recnrsend that the site plan be modified to acconu odate the chances
suggested by the East/'.lest Park'.'ay al ignment proposed by Brauer
Associates for the Village. This ui'I entail sone building
shifting as well as road intersection locations.
3. Reeorrend that the central building cluster adjacent to the
il Atherton townhouses hillrarrangereientith a to nrovideaautomobile will
access
toi l ize the tse fro
to those units from the loop road to the east rather than the
road between the totmhouse units and the units proposed. If
such a unit cannot he developed, recompment doleticn of those
32 units.
4. s
ad to t
e
clusternoftapartmentsmbetaligned withsthenBrauer A Associates
ern
he of the iates
alternate to coincide with Scenic!leinhtts-Citchetl intersection.
e
5. alto do otieliminatepany conflict s!ithitvietsti from t cluster at the suth building in the existing
tots house units.
d to the apartment units dead-end, suffi—
cient roads Engineering
E. e theu accesso the Villane Engt g
Dpor turnaround space acceptable
shall he included.
,Department for erergenc,
le: Recommend rezoning to Pit 2.5 for the 272 rental apartment units
U proposed 1w clew Torn Developnent, if the site plan meets the
criteria of the staff report and recoreoendations 2-9 as uell as
the revised alignnent of the Eastil'est Parkway as proposed by i
Brauer & Associates.
t, Recornend that divided entrance nagazines be used on the access
roads to the project.
pecomend establishment of public hearing before the Village
Council on April 10, 1973.
;lotion carried unanimously.
•
•
i I
3/6/73 Planning Commission
A. Cherrywood Apartments, proposed by New Town Development within
the previously approved Atherton PUD located east of tiitchell
Road in Red Rock.
The 24.2 acre site was illustrated and presentation given by
hr. Doug Johnson. Grading, soil, asphalt coverage, pathway system
charts were explained. Questions from the Commission were satisfied.
Action Taken
The proposal was referred to the Village Staff for report and
recommendations.
March 28, 1972, Council Meeting
D. Al EP:i0M, ROCKET DEV L!1?I:^11T C0RP03ATI0il. Public Veering (Continued
cc March I'th). Request i'or Rif 2.5 2on:n1. First Reading Ordinance
Ii.,_ 170. PUD Concept flan Aparoval. Resolution iNo. 507.
11r. Johnson, regprrsenting Rocket Development Corp. reviewed their prop-
osol for development of a 60 acre site. The Manager reported on the
Planning Commission's reconsnendations; approval of RN 6.5 zoning for the
townhou se poAtion of the appl i cation and that the number of townhouses
permitted id thin the area be limited to OS. They also recommended approv-
al of the. concept proposal for the remainder of the property on the basis
of the overal 1 dansi ty not exceeding 10 units per acre with judgement on
the density credit for flood pl ain protection being withheld until such
time as specific development pl ens for this sector were submi tted and
reviewed.
lir. Johnson stated that the townhouses would sell in the $25,000 to
$29,000 range, contain 2 bedrooms with a 2 car tuck under garage. jr.
Lieb asked about exits to Mitcliell Road and the traffic load that Mitchell
would have to carry. The Manager stated that Mitchell Road was ident ified
in the REDROCK Plan as a collector road and would be capable of handl ing
the anticipated traffic volume. Mr. Pete ICiose representing Rocket Dev-
elopmerst reviewed plans for landscaping the project parking area.
Mrs. Meyers closed the hearing and made a motion to adopt the first
reading of Ordinance Ho. 170 approving Rh 6.5 zoning in the first phase
of the project and Resolution No. 507 for their I'U!) Concept Plan on the
basis of the Rocket application material and the Planning Garaission's
recommendation. Mr. Nesbitt seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
f III
II
' I
f!.
1
•
•
3/21/72 Planning Conmnission
➢, ROCKET DEVELOPMENT_C OT,POi:lTION :he
Nova L:i !ce t, rat p.e:: rated his planning report dated h:iarch la,
1972_ In the report ha analyzed booth the initial rezoning phaco.•.
of the Rocket Development project as ::ell en their application
for concept approval on their entire G0 acre site. The report •
recoa1;acn:icd that the concept for the entire parcel be approved
— on the ba:cis of the overall density not exceeding 10 units per
acre or G05 units total as compared to the OM units prny;.oced
in the appt icetion. The concrpt approval recocnmcndation also
indicated that the necessary right-of-way for the proposed
parl::.cy and other public road systems be provided cad that
the pc,rtlen of the site on or near the Purgatory Creek flood
plain be properly protected. The report recommended that the
first phase 13.3 acre parcel adjacent to the Mitchell Road
be remoned to the Rivi G.5 zoning classification rather than
the f:iv1 2.5 classification requested and that the total number
of townhouse units permitted on that site be limited to the
C4 permitted under the PM 6.5 zoning requirements. The
application was for 96 units on that site. The report recom-
mended that the second phase area which is situated immediately
to the east of the proposed first stage townhouse area he idea—
titled as an apartment area but that the number of units that
are proposed in that area be substantially reduced In order to
prov.iclo more appropriate recognition of the steep terrain on
that segment of the site. Mother recommendation was that
the units to be constructed between the parkway and Purgatory
Creek be clustered on the knolls of land within that area in
order to protect the open spaces surrounding them.
&ir. Fosnocht questioned the appropriateness of the Village at •
this time committing itself to given density credit for land •
sat amirle for flood plain protection in the portion of the overall
proju^t locoted to the east of the proposed parkway. He
sugie sted that the effect of allowing a higher density to occur
on the remaining portion of that portion of the site might not
be de strable. The Village Manager indicated that the protection
of the area identified o, the locket proposal as flood plain
was one of a number of options the Village might consider for
controlling flood craters along Purgatory Creek between Highway
5 and ;tarlr. Lalce. Ile said that it might be appropriate to •
reserve final judgement on both the need and the density credit
policy until such time as the Village might make a final deterrn—
ivat.±.o!i on •.vhich of the flood water protection options it may
choose to utilize.
The Commission also discussed the proposed development In the
area identified as Area B, which is the land situated between •
I
•
•
the to-.anhorrses ;,dj.cceret to Mitchell Roect and ttie parkway.
life ['terming As:;ist,ant said hr felt that the type of building
struct�:re proposed in that area would be appropriate but that
ilio uur,ri.wer of such structures was in excess of the number that
the slope could reasonably be expected to accommodate. It
was the Commission's feeling that any action it might take
with regard to concept approval on the entire project should
not in any way indicate its approval of Rocket's current version
au to ho;r Area U might be developed. -'
Mr. LaGro.a" moved that the Commission recommend to the Council
that it approve RM 6.5 zoning for the townhouse portion of the
Rocket application and that the number of townhouses permitted
within that area be limited to 86. His motion also recommended •
to the Council that it approve the concept proposal for the remain-
der of the property on the basis of the overall density not
exceeding 10 units per acre Ivith judgement on the density credit
for flood plain protection being withheld until such time as
specific development proposals for that sector of the overall
site were submitted and reviewed. The recommendation motion
was also based on the other items in the March 18th staff
report. Mr. Nesbitt seconded. Messers. LaGrow, Nesbitt,
Fosnocht, Flavin and Manning voted aye. Messers Sorenson,
Brown, and Mrs. Schee abstained. Motion carried.
STAFF PI.?INNING R'r.PC)RT
Project: Atherton Apartments
Applicant: New Town Development- Landscape Architect: Charles
Wood Associates
Location: Located to west of the proposed East/West Parkway just
off Mitchell Road in Red Rock
Request: PM 2.5 rezoning from P.U.D. for 272 rental apartment units.
Date: March 16, 1973
From: Dick Putnam, Village Planner
Thru: R. P. Heinrich, Village Manager
CONTENTS:
A. Project's Relation to P.U.D. and Red Rock Plan.
B. External Influences on Project Design.
C. Site Planning.
D. Unit Types.
E. Recommendations.
A. Relationship to Red Rock Plan and Original P.U.D.:
The Red Rock Plan stressed the importance of providing a variety of
housing styles and income ranges as well as utilizing existing land to
its optimum purpose. The apartment project as proposed seems to utilize
the sloped terrain with good sensitivity to the slopes in the placement of
structures and roads. The income range and the type of unit proposed is
one that is not present in Eden Prairie today, appealing to the single or
young married in a semi-luxury price category. The Red Rock Plan
indicated that project scales should not be of large natures with vast
acres of same style units, rather smaller developments more intimate in
scale to utilize the natural terrain. This project does seem to fall into
that category with small, individualized buildings as well as relatively
low number of units for this rental project.
•
The original Planned Unit Development for the Atherton project indicated
over 35C units to be developed on this site, which was felt to be excessive.
The number of units proposed in this plan of 272 units seems to be very
workable if the proper building types are sited with the steep slopes.
B. External Planning Forces:
Of great concern to this site is the location of the East/West Parkway
which will connect at 169 with The Preserve Parkway into the north
•
t II
•
•
•
Atherton Apartments
Page 2 •
as it crosses over 212 with Baker/Mitchell Road through Edenvale and •
north to the Crosstown. The alignment of this east/west road is being
studied currently by Brauer& Associates, from the engineering and visual
esthetics point of view. The alignment which is believed to be the most
suitable alignment is not exactly what is shown on the Atherton plan.
If you refer to Diagram 1, you will notice the difference from the proposed
• alignment by Atherton and that by Brauers. The criteria for its alignment
related to using a maximum of an 8°curve with a maximum of 5°slopes.
The 80 curve and 5° slopes occur on the northern edge as it runs along
the Atherton property line to intersect with 212. Brauer's proposed alignment
does seem workable with the plan as proposed with some modification.
1. The loop road through the project that intersects with the East/West
Parkway should have that intersection moved approximately 200-250'
to the south to get off the 5° slope and onto the flat section of the
roadway.
2. All units should be set back at least 100'when the building is three
stories or more along this roadway.
3. The northwestern group of apartment buildings must have its entrance
to line up with the realigned Scenic Heights Road to form a workable
intersection.
The Atherton townhouses currently being built by New Town Development
are located directly southeast of the central building cluster and parking
lot. These units are sale, and will be occupied by this summer. In my
opinion, to protect the interests of those residents, the parking access •
and garage location for the cluster of 32 units directly to the east of those
townhouse units should be either moved a great distance to the east down
the hill, or more appropriately, to utilize a unit that can step up the hill
rather than down the hill to move the parking from the west side of the
building facing the townhouses to the east side or adjacent to the looped
street. This would necessitate redesign of these structures or utilizing
a structure that can step up the hill. I feel this is critical to protect the
investment that those buyers have placed in that site.
The second area where this is possible is on the northwestern building
cluster, the most southerly building, which protrudes along the slope and
seems to be a visual barrier with the two end townhouse units. By merely
pulling this structure back, it would seem that the view for those units
could be protected as well as pulling the auto court more interior to the
project.
•
Atherton Apart mo,its
Page 3
C. Sit PN-:nninq:
The basic site planniraj concept seems to be excellent, given the
constn_ints of the building design. However,this site utilizing a
spine central roadway with units stepping downhill and on the other
side, with the uphill slope seems to indicate to me that the necessity
for two building styles is not only appropriate but also necessary to
develop the site as consistent with the Red Rock planning work to date.
The unit flexibility which is a tuckunder garage unit with central entry
to the individual units is an excellent concept if it can be utilized with
the uphill concept. This particularly applies in the central 32 unit
spine previously mentioned. If a unit with an uphill capability is
developed, it would appear that it may be used in other areas of the
site, particularly if the loop road is moved to better accommodate Its
access with the East/West Parkway's redesign. The unit's flexibility
with the small eight unit module would seem to Indicate that the ability
to offset at least a minimum of 10 feet should be utilized in almost all
locations to break up the building facade, much as Fairway Woods has
done with their condominium units in Edenvale. This will visually
reduce the size of the building for those along the East/West Parkway
as well as the intimate scale within the parking courts. Also where the
opportunity exists to break the buildings and provide space between
them of significant size for visual openness would be encouraged.
The recreation facilitie s proposed of two tennis courts, recreation building
and exterior pool as well as substantial green open spaces provided seem
to be excellent, and I would highly endorse them. Also, the provision for
recreational vehicle storage is small well concealed areas seems to be
well accommodated. The field game space provided near the East/West
Parkway rounds out the recreational open space provided on this site,
which I believe is excellent mix of developed and passive open spaces.
Mr. Wood has indicated the extensive landscaping and planting of varied
vegetation in areas to achieve softening of the views from the East/West
Parkway with close proximity trees to the road as well as the screening
of such things as recreational vehicle storage with earth mounds and
vegetation, plus providing visual relief within the parking lots of the
structures between the road and lots and also the softening of the views
between units. In all cases, the units are over 150 feet apart and with
the addition of plantings and the grade separation, this should provide
an excellent living environment. Landscaping of each of the entry courts
to the building with trees and shrubbery within the parking lot areas as
well as small planted islands seems very important to the concept proposed.
The realignment of some of the buildings as well as the development of
a second building type to accommodate the grades of the slopes combined
with the minor road relocations will produce basically the same site plan
Atherton Apartments
Page 4
with some minor modifications necessary to complement the existing
units as well as the revised road location.
D. Unit Type:
The apartment unit proposed utilizes an interior, open staircase,
unheated, with individual entrances to each apartment. The garage
location on grade level under the building reduces the ground coverage
for structures as well as provides ready access to each unit's garage.
The units proposed with balconies and on a staggered level will aid In
sound control as well as providing an interesting entrance and views
from each unit. The use of the eight-unit buildings,providing amenities
such as fireplaces, all kitchen appliances, and individual heating
systems combined with the individual entry should provide a unit that in
the future could be converted to condominiums with relative ease. The
construction of these units, particularly in relationship to sound control
and adequate storage space, should be of prime concern to the developer
as he looks at the provision of condominium conversion in later years.
This is a trend nationally, as well as in Minnesota at this point, to
convert units from rental to condominium at an expedient point. The
site and unit provide that opportunity.
The architectural statement from these buildings shall be very critical
to the project's success as well as the views from the Village Parkway.
The site being a steeply sloping open field area does not seem to lend
itself to the in-vogue cedarboard building that we have so often seen.
Other architectural expressions would seem very appropriate on this
site. In looking at a cross-section of the building and the rear elevations,
one gains the feeling of a contemporary structure with an etched roof
that is cut off, providing a large skylight for the stairway, as well as
the recesses and fin walls on the buildings. However, when one looks
at the front elevation with the arched windows, shutters, cornices,
and arched garage spaces with a mixture of brick, asphalt shingles,
and stucco with wrought iron, the architectural continuity seems to be
greatly diminished. The expression architecturally of one vernacular
such as colonial, Spanish, contemporary with a minimal variety of
materials would seem to be more consistent with the building as designed.
The mixture of cedar fencing with brick first story arches with stuccoed
second and third story elevations combined with wrought iron railings,
and window cornices and shutters seems to confuse what could be
relatively straight-forward and pleasing as a facade. When the pitched
and vaulted roof with skylight is added, it seems rather inappropriate to
the varied architectural treatments. Similarly, the end elevation indicates
wrought iron railings on the fin wall overhangs. Some of these are
Atherton Apartments
Page 5
utilized for balconies while othersare there merely for ornamental
gingerbread.
I would urge the developer as well as the architect to reconsider the
choice of materials in handling the facade to unify the buildings archi-
tecturally with the highly visible site which it occupies. The utilization
of stucco, brick, and wood combined with the pitched roofs of dark
asphalt shingles may be too many materials on such a building type and
I would urge the selection of one material to state the architectural style
of the structure -that style being Spanish, contemporary, colonial, or
whatever.
E. Recommendations:
1. Recommend that the architect and developer utilize a more simplified
architectural statement in one material rather than the mixing of three
materials and varied architectural styles..
2. Recommend that the site plan be modified to accommodate the changes
suggested by the East/West Parkway alignment proposed by Brauer&
Associates for the Village. This will entail some building shifting as
well as road intersection locations.
3. Recommend that the central building cluster adjacent to the Atherton
townhouses be redesigned with a building which will utilize the step—up
hill arrangement to provide automobile access to those units from the
loop road to the east rather than the road between the townhouse units
and the units proposed. If such a unit can not be developed, recommend
deletion of those 32 units.
4. Recommend the realignment of the access road to the northwestern
cluster of apartments be aligned with the Brauer &Associates alternate
to coincide with Scenic Heights - Mitchell intersection.
5. Recommend that the south building in the northwest cluster be altered
to eliminate any conflict with views from the existing townhouse units.
6. Where the access roads to the apartment units dead-end, sufficient
turnaround space acceptable to the Village Engineering Department for
emergency vehicles shall be included.
7. Recommend rezoning to RM 2.5 for the 272 rental apartment units proposed
• by New Town Development, if the site plan meets the criteria of the
Atherton Apartments
Page 6
staff report and recommendations as well as the revised alignment
of the West/West Parkway as proposed by Brauer &Associates.
8. Recommend that divided entrance magazines be used on the access roads to the project.
9. Recommend establishment of public hearing before the Village Council
on April 10, 1973.
DP
•
3414390
new town development, inc.
64401Mns doud Mee.sults 102 •
eden prairie,mammas 55943
February 28, 1973
•
: CHERRYWOOD APARTMENTS PROPOSAL
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
• APPLICANT
New Town Development, Inc.
6440 Flying Cloud Drive, Suite 102
Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55343
PROPERTY
Located 4 blocks south of Highway 5 on east side of Mitchell Road.
Part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest quarter INN* of SA)
and the North Hal f of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter -
(n} of NE* of SA ), Section Fifteen i.151, Township One Hundred _
Sixteen(1181, Range Twenty-two 122).
Approximately 24.26 acres.
PURPOSE
To,obtaln approval of development phase and zoning for Mitchell Heights
planned unit development originally submitted January, 1972. (Concept,:
approval previously obtained.' Also, to obtain building permit for
272 units.
PHASING AND F1 NANCING
The total development shall be 272 units.
The first phase shell consist of 88 units for which financing has been
tentatively secured. Construction start is scheduled for Apri.l15, 1973.
The second phase shall consist of 184 units. Estimated construction start
is December, 1973.
PROPOSED HOUS 1 NG
Dolor iotion
Apartments to be bui I t wi I I be rental s.:- They will, consist of.8.uni t
modules a t t ached In townhouse fashion and shall be three stories with
tuck-under garages simi lar to that of,townhouses. There wi I I be no
double-loaded central corridors. Ali units will have semi-private front
entrances.
Exterior
Exterior design shall be Spanish consisting of pitched roof with reddish
shingles, SpanIsh stucco, brick arches, curved el here shutters and: flower
boxes.
•
w; ,w
eaaaio
new town development,inc
fiMO a deed di$e i5102
iptei
ed«i pnM..nMnrnc.etWa
yWODD APARTNIENTS PROPOSAL
Page 2 of"-:2 pages.
PROPOSED tiOUSING,•Description lcontinued" from page 11
1 • - Interior
Fifty per sent of: aLi.tlnits shal 1 have-built-ln fireplaces. All units'wiff
have;appliances.(Including dishe/esher), beamed ceiling, arched dining roe!,
individtiel gassfforcedsair"heating and air conditioning. .
pertinent Data
Totai_ proJeti of 272 units shai i have:the following mix: 121%studio
apartments; 12i% luxury one=bedroansp. 25% sem1-luxury,one-be an dros;
%
a,,� - 23f standard_one-beds'oana; l2��two-bedraane::with atndy loft 120
three-bedrooms with den.
Rent schedule: t'ates wit i begin at $155 for studio"apartments to $325 for
throe-bedroom with den.
This project will be strictly for adults and children over fourteen years
AMENITIES
• Amenities shell include recreation building sich consists of adult" end
}can center, meeting rooms, lounge, .arts end crafts roan, entertainment
center,"hea l th spa,,men's and:_wanenr s dressing-roan end cabana adjacent
to the outdoor Olyatpic-size;swimming pool. "
Additional amenities wilt includes car wash port; golf driving cage; two
tennis"courts; two handbell courts;" dmi.nton,.volleyball and basketball.
ba
provisions; and jogging path. -
OWNERSH-IP AND MANAGEMENT
Project Is owned and will be built by .New TownDevelopiient, lnc.."Property
management will be: performed by N9w.Town,Properties:
•
•
•
•
PLANNING REPORT •
• DATE: March 18, 1972
PROJECT; Mitchell Heights PUD
• APPLICANT: t Rocket Development Corporation) New Town Development, I nc.
LOCATION: West Side of Mitchell Road East and South ofScenic Heights
Road
REQUEST: PUD Concept Plan Approval and RM 2.5 Zoning on First Stage
of 13.3 Acres
REFER TO: Application Booklets Dated December 6,1971 and March 6, 1972
Planning Commission Minutes of December 6, 1971 and January
• Attached Comments to Rocket Development (hand written)
•
COMMENT: •
Rocket Development Corporation's approach to development has
undergone considerable change from their initial presentation
in December to the revised proposal of March 6, 1972. The
• addition to their development team of Peter Klose, a landscape
architect, has noticeably altered their concept. Their proposal
has become more sophisticated during the period it has been
before the Commission.
Rocket Development has been working with Shelter Corporation
• regarding the public street between their properties. An agree-
ment as to the road location has been reached which is accep-
table
to the village staff.
•
The March 6, 1972 proposal is a new plan which the Commis-
sion should review in the context of the REDROCK plan.
gelationship to existing land use - the Rocket Development is
isolated from existing developments and consistent with the
REDROCK Plan.
•
,Relationships to natural features -
-The first phase townhouse section is on gently rolling, relatively
level land and does not present any soil or drainage problems.
-The 24 acre section on the west side of the Parkway has slopes
from 15 per cent to 6 per cent which present some constraints
in development. The proposed 6 unit 2-3 story structures is an
• appropriate type for this slope condition. The 24.2 acre section
east of the Parkway has 9 acres within the Purgatory Creek
flood plain with soil limitations. The remainder of the site will
support buildings, but clusters or groups of buildings would be
. most appropriate on a 20 foot high knoll. The preservation of
the knoll and the flood plain should be required in planning
development in the future.
•
Relationships to land suitability •
• -The townhouse project is on the same type land as Shelter's
first phase and wil present no construction problems. The ,
critical feature will be the environment created by the addi-
tion of the 96 units on the flat land. The structural type
and optional floor plans offer good flexibility to vary the •
. height to suit the terrain. The landscaping and recreational
space use is critical to success, but if the proposed earth
forms and plantings are incorporated, the development should
•
- be a proud residential environment.
• • . -The apartment phase west of the parkway requires more care •
..in siting buildings and planning but will provide for excellent
views from the, slopes. The retention of the open area on the
• • north to provide recreation space and visual relief from struc-
. tural massing is critical to the proposal. More study must
- be done of the request for rezoning to insure that each struc- .
• : . ture relates well to the site. Rocket Development has demon-
strated that they are aware of the special requirements of
this site and will be addressing the site more thoroughly as
the apartment phase is developed.
...The east side of the parkway will require specialras parts •
of the site are not developable, while others have slopes
' . greater than 15 per cent.
. Community force s
r -Rocket's townhouse phase will be moderate income range.
The mix of rental and sale units is consistent with the RED-
' ROCK objectives. A recommended average net density of 10
• units/acre would coincide with the Redrook plan.
Needs and objectives 1 c,
-Utilization of natural resources - The proposed townhouse
• stage A conforms to the requirements of the site, The B
' area adjacent to the parkway has slope conditions that will
limit the density of the development. A reduction in the pro-
posed 348 apartment units is suggested to better meet the
• requirements of the terrain. Area C presents problems and
• ' will require that the 9 acres of flood plain be protected and .
that buildings be clustered.
-Utilization of personal resources - It is recommended that
Rocket Development continue to employ professionals in the
• • development process. The team needed to complete a quality
project of over 500 units must include capable people from
many disciplines.
• ,Quality of design, image, vitality-Townhouse stage A will
be a well planned project if some units are removed to create
• _ 'larger, more meaningful open spaces. A critical factor is the
r treatmont of the interior court used for parking. The proposed
t earth mounds and extensive landscaping will provide a very '
pleasant space. Detailed design as well as plant material
bond to °Mean Lire acr;rr tiC•'iio0 anrj oiti iUOgs Will 0 Flo
completing these spaces. The townhouse area can be a good
•
residential environment with care given to detail.
-Vehicular and pedestrian movement- The use of Mitchell and
Atherton Roads as access points for stage A is consistent
with Village policy. Also, the access to stage B off of these
. streets is most desirable. The internal, private street systems
are workable and do not present major problems.
' ' The pedestrian pathways are well conceived to connect tot i~
lots and recreation facilities with individual units. The con-
.. nection along the parkway to Shelter's pathway system is con-
!. sistent with Village park planning. •
-Parks and open space-The open space provided in the townhouse
stage will be enhanced greatly by removing about 10 units to •
provide a lin15. to the recreation area on the slope in B. The
• tot lot locations in A are well placed so as not to conflict
with individual units. The'north cluster of apartment units in
B is sited in a grove of trees and will require extreme care.
•
Development of area C must respect the land in the flood
plain. Village and developer cooperation can best utilize the
site for multiple density residential while protecting the flood
•
• plain.
The provision of two swimming pools and tennis courts might
best be handled as a joint venture between adjacent developers
or the Village. The potential for public recreational facilities
of the Village Center should be examined as development pro-
gresses. .
The plan •
• -Densities- The Redrock Plan indicates the average density for
this area as 10 units/acre. The Rocket proposal is higher
than this overall density. Rocket's 60.52 acres (excluding
the Mitchell Road right of way) would permit a total of 605
units conforming with the Redrock Plan. The current Rocket
• proposal has 814 total units with a density of 14 units/acre.
' The density within the townhouse stage A is 7.2 units/acre
including the Mitchell Road right of way. The request for
rezoning to RM 2.5 would permit many more units on this
site whereas RM 6.5 zoning, the normal townhouse density
category, would reduce the unit total to 86 and produce a bet-
ter single family attached development.
-General-The basic changes in the Rocket proposal would make
• the development consistent with the Redrook Plan and the Eden
•
Prairie Comprehensive Plan.
Recommendation
1.The overall density for the 60.5 acres should be 10 units/acre
i h thereby allowing 605 units. The current proposal has 814 units
` producing a density of about 14 units/acre.
2.The parkway right of way should be given to the Village, and .
the flood plain protected without penalizing the developer. •
J
•
.
•• - Rocket - 4
• '.3. The townhouse 13.3 acre section should be rezoned to RM
6.5 permitting a total of 86 units.
• :` 4. The area B apartments are appropriate for the terrain, but the.
number of units is excessive.
5. Area C will require clustering of the proper structural type
• to preserve vital open space.
6. Concept approval be given to Rocket Development Corpora�— ,
' tion's revised development plan for the 60.5 acre site•Lvest•
of 1vlitchell Road if the previous recommendations are met.
•
•
• ..,;V.,
b 4.
ti
I .
•
k `
-047
t,(t y•
•
t •
•
•
t
•
•
:r, •
4
_ a
j .
w T:et,i1, `XNTJ
w
�•� .�� . 'i
1 j
r '
Vtip
J i1/-
`i ' • sn
74 t,cs �, hw.;Alt 4*
r� ' �"�+
r a�{ K ak, -Y ,r�4
t R I,y' " t- 'prlc,•
!• r t'..
t�� 'kss so h'� rt'�hx. f
t. 11,;A SSA i r ,1 4 6•.!s
4 wl 1
•
r.f
I • y
•
a `
•
,,
�i 4,j�. `fy{.It,- M _r
I e' �.t�..5 V �F' r "
•
t J
•
9
N 410- tE`^2 ../! "xy ""=�6�t7CLZ. . yam-__ 1 - .,.__ � a.- AA��..' ..
mars.a•...e il1Y 3i' .,.i_ - - . _.'�- �`
,040
•
4r`: ? \ •'s ' 1 i? , `#-f> i 417 r? (')mot V' j1`
4# - it 44. ‘•:‘. 4
. #4., ,_ ,
„.., ,, , ., , ..., • ,• •...: , •••
,, , A ....,' '
I OW 4 ' . )
rr•
��', ` � ' li'�,,v,...00,tt ,';,„ ! ,
� Sa
1 1
\ 1 - til ES �'•��� CIF fob,,. ��" �:. VI
r • N. - 71,,,, 4 ' ' , „
Ni\N
ifs\\
1 ' - i I r tax��i -r,, . , /•.,..,.......,,,,, , i /
. _.: . .1
1;
„1, .,,, , , ,..,
2 A A` �� 1` ,, ,
��,',. ..,,s..N.... , ,.\--.._.....-___ ....— .. ...„.• ...., _ ,.)..... • ,:,.. ./ \ ir,\ • 1 ,,
r,u�in �fn ail ��l �� / ��/
IP ; 1
T.
, ,,,
. k . .., . ., Itr,b, ,m,. . _ _.
______,,., 4. ../.. ,,I,
., ,, , ,
..... .,, ,,, ,..., , .„,,.. 1 .
1.
, . . ._- / . , y
C ♦ y}
),\\' ..,:',.,,,, / „„,./' •' ,
, i• ;, / ...! ,,,,•75:---":71------- ,? , . / , ,,,,,,/ ' i
Lr
•
•
re.' '.....' ' ) . ' 1 ,\--/2 • v• : ' ' ''''- • . •:I. .'„1 i .
•
G ,, /, '
- ,• •maw t,,,,f , y.1.. -tf
.'. = ='•"meµ=. - ; _ _1-s . — -_.:_;.,. 1
F.,
'r--- \ \ - .' '' 4‘
02
•
' ',) ' „ -- - • .i
,y; _ \ ./ iii t.
7/ ,-,, 2 . , Jr 4
•
it
,--+ . 1 I -- � ,
.....)
; :\ .�. I �-
•
I . 11 \: • 4 ' i it
\ ft �
,, / ',,,/ . ,
•
'i' / ,/i/ ! ----- 7 „o; i
'/-..- ,---., • ' •7 1
/ •... - , ;
V. .-;-. .--d -1 K •
• ' ( 7
-\ ,:to • 1 -r -. of, 1 / I ,• , (----',-, - \ .1
a. +', Y Kyy • �►T •yl�i' i/ !_ ... - A fir'\ �,iv r . r 4..,�i
a� y K
y r,
♦t 4
•
\'• W1 � 01
a y' e `
- ..- a _.'. .- .4 '4 94. .49A- ii'lita,{ 49
•
4..".•• • ,-..--17 , , .....16"r .
.11%, whoim,_ .._-. . ens.
i. .Eg7:.------_-..- ,...:• -•.'--zili=•1.1.11-*:•07.- =--. :=t1i=ii -.-1*:.'..i-2: c .. _ =.. —...za=c,.._ =.1:04.6.....assaismffriti
-:.,... ...;.7...- lr
,...,,. . ,.......,. .. , , ,. ,,..„.... . ,,,..
10"
f A
---- .• \ \ ••• ,•'‘, oh A, - -- .,- s. ,6- ----A,
„.. ,
..- ,/ \....*, • , \ ,
.7...._--\\
, • w -0- , -
."b \ '.....''' ,,,1.. ••4 1:. '•44410:22(-.14;;4,, 41010., , .," - ,...10_ sliiiikwili ,Ilif I it"iin;"ie.,\\„.._• .' . ..1 ,. ! ' .., H . 7 II, ' jr-
'
( !'' . * • -' ,, i I i . 1 f ....--.........-—
1 I
! 1 ‘' .1 1, , ; ' 1* . • ArIIIII.7
7.', . ,I1-_, )I 1 I \ • ,AV.,„. . I ,,,,. .
,, -'--__ .. . , ..1,01- ',+'-, `'.\.,Pj iltA.-_, '4-.- /Ai L_ .r7.'iP .,..'•
.---:- 'N,.., ' I ----- i! ik 'a . 6 * ;-"•-----e, -••••, -%%."/ 1 'IV ' Vo'-'
----...,.. ..„ , • . . , dk .,/,,,,,,
, i •-• / ./ittr.,/l .0.41, '7' /
. —_ , •kilici\1/4'11k,4 V/.. „ r. '• Ns, . ,,,,• /./
-_ 41,\ . --\7-, •_.-. , I 111)1 ;,. ... ...:4_. 0?ior id ... 1 ;
•-- 'itaillil ti nib-t,'jille. f/ /
.-. '' \\: '':"S'\\< \ --"--- . '6/1 i g 1-21,01.,•,,,,,:, j -,,,- r. 1 ,/,/,
-41 OM
-•- -'' .; . .k.. ., • \ • ... - / . ' ,., - i 4111111M
•-N mil
, 01 0 ,,
.., ,.. . _._.,,, , , a 144,-,...i.,, _._aminipP1,14111, 104w ,./ /. , I-Al
• Arn KITO.P.Pio.r.,"--)..- Aftwire., .14p ' ,, 1
/ - '•-'-
i \ s- .,0 .......--_,..,
- 1 ' 4,0041"..„,,,,ow--,,.........—.:0, 411111%.,. .4,000%,..00, ., • - • I•
- - .- . '1r - -.."-mx.....- opi
-. pi 0 I I 0" //03 mour401100010,- --- --., ,
•\
\-\:'\'‘,.. i ----,- •-\``, .. ....2- `•••-',, '. , /14004.-. .. .
\N ,y ,' \ , vA,._ ip- ... .... _,,;-----, • , .
' ' • . --!,,,i; ->**
"VI ' , -1 •i • -..----, , ,,t
! rs . 1 i
[ a %
. ,. 0
i , I
ht;., ,‘ .'''-r-''i i ' ' / / •-il / ' - , -,, ' • ,/ ,P !
. ..
..„
•,') . /lii ',' -- , ,1- -_-;_-__L----' . .1/./ ,- " ,- „ . ...,....,4 , , 1
;,,.. •, -/iii, .
l'/ ,1/;• ' , A
. . , ..
// 1 .
. . .
, ,. ,, , , : . i ., , ,1 '4, ,•"' ,
/ / ---- ! i , i s ,/,"„/•/ i 1 , ' , ; .! ' '
f ,
. , .
L______,.......„.4 \, ,,,_ -', •-% / i . ,
\ i, ii i , •t
i
./.4./ ., .. . . ;-'. N..-,..-‘. , .. 4
4, 1-
' Y( /,' ,• . \ -‘‘ ‘. .s ,, ,
(
, •
i i ,..„,, ! , !, • -, •.s. , ,\. \ f'
,' ' I . A ' • - : ., 1 rt
•.:. '-. 7.:,.....•. . - 1 , ' I( \. •k-.. ',‘ ' .1 • .
;
.., .. .. i .. .. \ .. \\\-i . 1
1 .
.....!-=.,i1.;‘,,-....:. • Ili
‘t • ' ^: '-';_:.-• j . ,.- , \ \
, •
'•.`.,-.,., ,,,, - ..-- ,, ,,r
;,.,-.7 ^,kii tri' : • .',.. .-1'. .-' Vill' ....Virk tikiNg vial, -:-......, .- ,. ., ..,..
... , , ,...,,,. t.,oili .:.,:.. i,,,. -., -. .-,., Alp.m,„,i. -,-T-5 , 01,. , ,t, •t.„,„ .;
. -
, , . . ....
. .:-. •. .
, .
. k
., , ' :,•" ;:,:' •,',
'1-'44fg?1110 ;4- .:.. . ` • ..•. - ',.. - ' itAr 15ro ,s. . . . ..
-'. "..4-,1 ';,,,;-,' ', ' ' ,. - '' : ,.4} ‘rs. ' ' "-.:'.1 'ee.•,4"-'..- : - - ' *, ''F'.- -. .1.1". '
bra s "' 144 _ srf
i -; '''' 44E. 'e `�1+`ar ,,"'` • ,, , .—1 '`1 •: ye_,,,f fir: fit,
R w• .�
1# •�lta�,�fI 1 ail `'► 11* - �,!i w ��
r
of
00,,,,,d ,.. .i..1 ,,. 1
• i' 0• _
,,,QQQ s r ' �''
•, ',\ . _ :p,.,' 1 il'11.‘ ' ..ith tio,,..44\;:, ‘
'1',.1L,70,-_-•i....1-•-
'"._.-:",".-,.‘-%,,-.NZ'.,‘::.'.:.\t''.,,ss".t-,•.•q.5
,z;,,'":...."..„-...1-.,%.7„.•:4.-...„0-.'..-1,0:;..s.:z.{-•r--A,-,-''!---9'-.t\t'.W 11•,1.-1',\ol•-\'i',l'\,,',".;
,c‘',.,
Ii
.fi ',_ _ i ‘`� \1\\N `, ti V``\ /,/I1
•
00 It.
\ {\ t � \ f , `JL\�v1 �III V i
I N../ \ I11 :
i /l ' f iI I �i \ \ \ :!;‘'d .., .• •' ".` 4\ I' „/
' _ _ 1l
/ ,/ , 1 '. -
„ ` Y
47/ , ; .1
712
t1 . llla.uuulw„r � �,��
' J
IAdow
iP
! .. N.S,, : . /j' r ' .
.. ' / ,/.,// -- 2----, , - -.
I.t _, yl / //�• • 1 '� A 1 • -
- c .:, ( !. il . ,. ! .
�I 1"
'' f ,r n \'#'y -• H f4 1.-,-. c. ` Air i
f f9q .r ' ��f M l ••! � t7�k �' •��r•��' * r
. . -{ 4" ...'' 'kr':-'�r 7 w _ a 1",. IDS<- aM•A. yYn
1.1t n„• , I �. '" f II , a ;
•
�r, f • j7z.. t •{ i..
.
r s
,
• -&--......-74.2."---,•-*•••••'r— N ..'-..*"....,____ ..."'""1"'
-
4.-. 1.'' A4t 49 theilienti mr---or • ... -• as, -. ._ .- . _. _
04 1,.1*, 4. .40.. •#.4.140111IP......;kiii---•-••- =atm-:.--.‘.1.1.10 WI liala.. . . _ ,.,,.. .
AIL: , ,-'.111..(41-,.. 'mak v., • ...:.-1. --;:- i ) c -
„ 0- 1 .22/2"11S , I , . At'...
- - %,„1 6, ,. \ , . , ., nil.„ •-.., . , „ ..
•iak ,. ., -, .% • 4 ' 40 or i
• 1 1
.4.
i 14,.." ,7'-'1 AP -• • ', •‘34;3 4,141fr '' 4 •
•,.I i/ , 4 4,,,i, ? 41116 1 ak
e-?
lir ' , # N E
, : f ,,,, .-......._.1/4 1.7,.,..,^ \'', '• `.;.••?'i• , &V . , \
-,--1',t•• ,,,, t a, 1.!.- • I ,V ,,_ . 1r#6, - ,,,,.• ,,•"—^ V AI
,,.. . , e" - ''• \ \ '.• .vt ' ' ' 4•'/' ‘..,-.) if e\- •
) le" -- / # #A, \- • -- , `N 1 1
„i • . 1 '
1•;$' • 1 ''- •' i,/ \_.•^N 3... ,C:e.71 _k.] 111114:,,ft e• <, , „cii, `A
r qt\' • ) qfp 'T.=
1..
\.'‘, ‘,,,,,----t ' • .• -'-'-' . i
10%•`...` e , \\,-•-___.. ), - -e• ,--
-,,i„,9,:fw,., .,1,4 • -J . . ,. .
lie 1 i 1• „,,,-,?.,:?,; , I,-- ,
1 ( , , , •11 t '
1 r
'.. .g '....... • c' gr)
I Lt.11 :::,,,::,3:. ',Iiif.i 2" , •4 , •
N. ,
1 14 7- . 1'IL - *
' -'
tirli,?,„.-.-,t _J :,,,, / . •
/1,---,I•i _ - v\ - - /
-0 si - _ (07
,
Ve'l _
1‘ -4 1 `
11114144 0 , . 4 /,
CI ?..40,„41-1 ,-. 11 1'1''.', •N 1o.t., , 1 - v44 t•• ilk , •
;......t.f....f._:: it . \ , . ___ •• i 44.:.
.„.r...,.,..._•,.- ,N' ' _ : I 1
....---,
i• 1
- ‘....\„ 1 r
. ,
, 7 -
- • I
r 1 . • i li i I it 1111110411111P
- , •
// ' 11\ s , ' .........• /- /
'I I• ' ti , , \
NI\ \t‘
I/ 1
,i •' . „,
*
. Ns ,, -------. 1 1 • , /
II, !
\
, \
•, V
,
1 - i \;` .'
\ 1
/j t i . /," •
. .
- 1 ,
.. ''' •' .N_____ • : I % 4
------.--- ----7 1 I
„e"- . _
4 , ), • '• - I
,,..
•,...., ..4.04 .
• ,, . .
''.---7'
2 t I I
• ._•• \• ' // 7 V '. i
, , ) 4,1 •10 / i • \ 1
.• • I 111 .„,/ --;,_.. ...„,...-•-•.- / • ,
I_
-.
00
• /, 'r / " ,--- ......,__„---. It ,' -- • I ,
,
.. ' 1 ,,•• •,,/"•St
,, h i,„1 .A1" I,. .J.‘• /
,
y
ii,i : ,, ../,..,•
-•-
.
- 1 *. # ." t
! L . . ,
E
7 i 1 -
12 ,, • e L. -, , \ I,... ,I.
...., , ., • , , 's 1 •N • V . - • 1
•\
1 ',.. .N AT. T e - i,A q , , 71 • . k
•.„ 1 1 ."4
• ,, . .k.., k I • t /IN! ..,, , , %
' 4 -
' '•"""'''''"' 7 1 . .-.. ÷ "Mg ••10,t.,4 ... 4 . -
trk .."'. # '' 410c.' Si 4.. r-fliN . - 11. 1 taii, st , • , , . 1,
• --et . •:, .1 , , ,,, .: • 'i 4. .•;',0 ,' Itio,' 2t,
• ..,,--e. ,' e . , i • t
•
rg,,, -•": s • p ir t - A. .. " '''''''' . iik,4 t • 1,-1,,..
.. :. , 11 .. '-'. 3C:,.."-•1 /:/1 . ' -"‘ 11',
) . *
. .. .
r4 w
vets f A I.: - AN,. %. 2.2 •• , . 4. . , 2 N. . r
fi
' 4' t. - - = 6 •44 i i r. -
. • •-
-4 • ' .1'•': ligi i ,a-,rnat .... a .21.4110%,W .' t , 'Ilt,' , .0 - 2,4
NW
. . .
.. r...1.,:.4 .
II f
W.•
+ .fiti
t. . -. .. W
b. ''',...
I IV),
awo .--r- a
/,:, ' 'g.
a ik • ' 111111111111111.1
• .' II.
• la
ct
'.. ' 1(' •
I
1 -1
.111' I V I
la ! 1
III
..._._r_...
_ ___ ,. . , . ..... .
. . ,
4
t a jit Hit- ' '
I I X
1 I $ 1
,'• ', ,, "I ,' /.,1
• t .1 .p 7 II 1
r
I III P
t „ \\ ,• ri
1 11 1
I 1 1 I
, \+. • ft, , 1 i
..-.1
• 11 4 1 i
tie, .,, •4000,..
„._____ . I,
. • imosim.
,\
/ f ' '', . . . —r 1.... . ,.
. ,
4' ,
• f
4.- ' 1 .11
. .
. •/
!, 7 r
4. I A
t
1. 1
.tt 11=111•1•/-__ _ ____-----
/ I I
- .4-'-t
..
• t
I,
1 -
i.i /..-' - L It I I 711 7 1 t
_ , . t I II 1
_ ...
, .
•
.._
, p ..
_ .
r-- - iimmileill
1
.- I 1
.. -it'•
1 .
1 . -
1 , - 1..,
. r.: 011111r‘
te 4.. I •-1
1 5
rt 4 '
.t.i 1 .
.. -- -
4.
1 - ,
1 -Ia. A-_L_.__1t . ri•.... 11,,_, . 4.
ill',7
1 '
• . 1 i / .
-\ i i k
r ri Is iiiiiii 111111 .
. ,
I qi 1
.....
•;i4j,.',"- . ''. ' ,,,, I
I , -
I .
,.,''e, ,,•''''' I
1 ;
wow'
I I
INN, ak
vs-'
. ,
I ll
. .
, • ....,- -.....,
If . 1 •••
ow 10 • .
I P Li.ii,k,..•i alai i ,a,
• lialsow
•
• Is I :o•P '
. 1 . ..
.•
• .dp
•+Ed
1
/ •
i I
1.7
It
i
MI 71 i I
• :1: . .1
. 1 i
! I
E lit 4_, II;30 ..__4 ,
.1, ill
, mil
, 1
It
1 I
II
1
11‘'
.,,,,...„.......,
.,..-' --4-4 1 t......„
_..
. , 1
1 • .
: .
j1 Ii
, , ..... . ,
It_
1,15," it
I
11.1—' II
1 1
I .
1 i
r it
'I.
- — :. '
,r...
ik
I ! 1 1
1 •
I
f #----
II
. . 1
it
, t
. 1
, .41
I i I 1
1 I 1 •
. i
t 1 I
1
i • , , • • ---
!
I I I 1
f • i
] 4.
— .. ll ,
1,‘
,
1 1
, ,
......... ........_.
,
..._„....._
_. .1 .itr
_ . • . ..... t.,ift a..., 1
_ . : .. .
-
7.4
i (__
:- .. __ ,i .... at !al ) -_
ve4lir 1.7211 1 so I . a , 1•
If
. ,- /
/
0 IF/•
/ '
•
I ,-.../E: i 1 ' 1 li ,
--- , ...„,, ! _ 3
ri
III 4::3, t.7. 1 it
g1tjfj1-
IIler
=Id 77,.*: i :../7-:Ilia II/1
I :II. ii.
I lls
ir
I j r li
1
I I �
_ b,
, : ,1 111 1 _
. 1,
1
1)
)11)' in 1 .-.� 1.11. . �Iwi_„,=.___ , i t,
siwa
I
f 1,11, 1
a Ilii 1i yi
, ) I _ i . . II
z II SM
)1 ,,,�'�� r ,
'
-
'I .L
Ji in i ��CHI
li'
I'
. , ....
I ` 1
, _
1111,
v S
I
i f i
1 ® ri ^. =¢ j `I'j 111
„xiY .�
= ,, ii h 101. 1 ilj
I i il El H /
,[ii) 11,',,,..,,, 1
_,ii, t ii I
r: --..
i I 1ir!. ICI Ii
I �li.
, 1
ii n
, ,1 11,1,!.,,
it � ;
•
1.111.119
•
4•
4
A , I 1 Iii il I I I 1 , • ' r ,, P
I 1 1
1 1 • 1 ii 1 I i 1
1 - • - , - -• ; ?,. • .
11 0 1
1 1
r 4
h - ; II
• a
It
i 1,1 II i
.•
,1 II 11 I t
I t
•••••••• - ...w..:
. alminimi.
• 1 , —.-.. —
UM III&
• il I itH na....• EV . .ti':,•
• .. ,1
•
e.., I- 4
,I, i
✓ 14.. 11.1
.
I
.....
7 . It
: 1-71r7 1
1___- t i Ly • • 0
,
- _.......,
...,
\ •
1, -; - - _ __ ., . ,•... :.,.....,...,..5.....
!'.:___ I. II_ , ' •-• -v.t.--4, •,., ,,,, •
•,-./4, T1 ..111
!--
. 1111:il , 1,
, , 1 , ,Ii..4.774.4. 14.4.• •-•"'1
, : I . •
X K .,
111111t I
. I 11
II
ii I_
L _____L___-----
-7:- :-I------
i
ig 1 1 ll
I .411 t 1 i
II
. 4H
i. I
1 1• . .
.
i
,
,
i
ILI Li se:•-..„, __,
o .
II 1,16,1 r ,
. ..
- ! ._ -. ..... ., .
•, c 4 *V.,..3'.;'. .
• ._
-, -
gat 17
L
II la ,
Is
. ,
, r
.111.•
.;„ - . . . • - •
juglii10111 kilr
R •,, - . P.
k. .
: • L ;: -......, „ 0, ,, . ."11 .: 3
r
, ....
--_
,___
A . .
_ ., ...,.. _
4:111:,..1,,, .
,
, ,, i
i
. _ ._ . ,
., z ...XX ._i _.
sime 111,
f I win
me de 1 .z.,....,.: _...,aip.
Al
T q , ,
i
ii „T„.., ,
il an: [•- I 11, rlicl ; i ;
; ..-- -_-_-- •
III 1 0 ;
; 1
11 !II I 'I m= .
1 1, j
....ij p. PI , ,
:.1111- ,
4i%41 V.I ---L----4-- ------
_
r----,r-----7---- --,. 7.-,1
• f 1 ' 11 - .,
0 I II II
'4 ','''
II
,, 111 ill a ..iii—iFra, . • q ii
10 11
_..
I.
0
0
ii
__.....-- 1.11 i... 1
.. • r 11 i, li JL__ W9
. -- ... -1..ti
mi.
• ----,-_-....„ = fill
- - - - • g
• ---i.--...1._-._ k mis -1
11
1 -.
140,
"'it
el .,-.11:-....,,,,-.
E .4.,-..,=.' i,I , 1, 1 •
'':"...._.V.7.7. ' • I •
„,., II I if 1 11 1 •
I
1
L__-1-1.---4...---ii_—L_
i.
. .. .,. ,
• ,''....7 , '...:.i....1.''''''i''..'',.'''',r
ill • . I
, ,. - • '
I I
.... .
. .
•
' l
, , It_ 1 E �
r o
9 2 t y
O • 1 ,
; --
!'V
��
i
L__. _ .... . ,
_•_•:„.. I ,. ,,,,,u ,,
,, ,, i • .., . .
ii ,
ii!,_ ,,
•• ,, it i, - - -, .
_..t.---.._ ,?,
10i 1t,•
_ `r _ „
,,____I A ii' . ---.-.-4_.,I ,__ _ ___ i ......
F' i
igiri i� ii Imo'
r l;U
111
i [
aam . J 1 iji
sire, r yam _
flit i . 1
F. ..
I t =.
g
! .
i
3/20/73 Planning Cocmission Minutes
C. Zachnan Homes, Inc. clustered single fanily plat in Edenvale. Pequest
rezoning to flit 6.5 and Preliminary Plat Approval For single ford] "
homes. Staff Report. f-
Pr. Putnam shoved the Commission m4anhers varies uses of clusters and
voiced his opinion that the Reeder-Zachnan concept did not incorporate
the best use for the site in question.
In response to a question from l'rs. Schee, Hr. Zachnan said they
considered the proposed units as single detached townhouse with no
homeowners association. A house for the middle income family!dill
be provided.
hr. Peterson addressed himself to the Engineering report reconnendation
1 saying that if they were to comply a townhouse would be the only
type of unit which could 5e built; Staff report recornendation 6
showing if the 130' distance were conplied with, the only 3 rods of
townhouses would be buildable; Staff report recommendation E indicating
that if the units did not face lbedhill, they would not be usable;
therefore, increacinq the price of the other units in the development
by $500.
Prs. Schee requested clarification of the douhle car/single car
garage option, fir. Zachnan explained the most people w111 buy a
double garage but the buyer s:rould have the option. Space would
be provided to expand the oversized 14' single garage.
In answer to Fir. Sorensen's query regarding the recreational vehicles,
ilr. Zachnan said that restrictive covenants would cover this storage
probl en.
Cr. Zachnan in answer to Hrs. f'eyers said that the homes could be
built on the lot line and that no fire wall would have to be built.
homes would cost between $30,000 and $35,000.
Hr. Williams of the Human Rights Commission said that they arc
interested in providing homes for the $9•11,00t1 income range family.
fir. Peterson felt that Edenvale has strived to nake this kind of
housing available with the Zachnan 7th addition being a good design.
Action Taken:
Pr. Sorensen made a motion recommending disapproval of the Edenvale
plat. Pr. Casey seconded. !lotion carried unanimously.
1
3/6/73 Planning Commission Minutes
B. Edenvale 7th Addition, zero lot line homes proposed by Reeder/
Zachman on a 6.8 acre parcel in Edenvale's northwest area.lir. Don Peterson explained the plan for the site and Pir. Zachman
showed the hone design which will be geared toward first-home
families, ilr. Peterson said, would be members of the Edenvale
home owners association; but, in addition to this, covenants for
this particular site would be written. The zero lot line detached
hones %sill be priced between $30,000 and $40,000.
Action Taken:
Investigation, report and recommendations were requested of the
Village Staff.
•PLANNING STAFF REPORT:
Applicant: Zachman Homes
Project: F.denvale 7th Addition •
Location: Edenvalo's northwest area at the corner of Woodhill
Drive and Woodland Drive
Request: RDA 6.5 zoning from P.U.D. designation, and
preliminary plat approval for 30 single family
detached lots to be built as zero lot line orr—
clustered single family homes
Date: March 16, 1973
From: Dick Putnam, Village Planner
Thru: R. P.Heinrich, Village Manager
CONTENTS:
1. Compatibility with Edenvale Plan.
2. Compatibility with Natural Site and Related Uses.
3. Site Plan Analysis.
4. Recommendations.
1. Compatibility with Edenvale Plan:
This site is part of an area in Edenvalo that was approved at a gross
density of 5.8 dwelling units per acre. This site is adjacent to the
Hipp's townhouse project, of which the first phase is approved. The
original concept for serving this parcel was with a loop street rather
than with a two cul-de-sac system combined with adjacent parcels.
The proposal for the clustered single family use with two cul-de-sacs
seems consistent with the original Edenvale Comprehensive Plan. The
provision of housing for the family units in the low $30,000 price range
supports the Eden Prairie and Edenvale policy of providing a broad range
of housing costs.
The relationship to existing land use as proposed in the Hipp's project
adjacent to the Edenvale 7th Addition would be townhouses that would
parallel the Woodhill Court or western cul-de-sac to the west of
this site. The distance between structures as proposed would be
approximately 90 feet, fronting directly onto each other. The northerly
two or three units would have a hill of approximately 8-9 feet high, if
it is not removed, between those units and the adjacent units. However,
the southerly units aro in basically the same grade as those proposed in
the llipp's project.
2. Site Features:
The site is a high knoll which drops from elevation of about 937' to
approximately 900', dropping off to the southeast from approximately
•
Edenvale 7th Addition
Page 2
the tot-lot area in the center of the site. The rolling site offers the
opportunity to build units with a walkout as well as a split-entry
capability on both cul-de-sacs, which will permit a variety of unit
styles. The other significant featuresof the sitea:e the two heavily
wooded areas on the northwestern corner through which the Woodhill
Court cul-de-sac cuts and the areas of trees on the southeast
corner which buffers against Woodland Drive. Basica lly the remainder
of the site is open as field cover today. Of significant importance is
the ability to utilize land forms to the best advantage by providing
buffers between housing units as well as providing a variety of housing
units. The clustered single family unit concept would offer this
opportunity, utilizing different floor plans.
3. Site Plan Analysis:
'The concept for traffic movement within Edenvale utilizes the collector
streets unencumbered by individual driveways, looping through the
community with local individual house access roads clustered off the
major streets. Woodhill Drive and Woodland Drive are two of
these major streets which front on this project. The two cul-de-sac
streets provide access for 28 of the housing units proposed. However,
there arc Iwo units on the corner that would take acce ss directly off
Woodhili Drive. These are the only units -- single faintly, townhouse,
. or whatever -- that have been proposed to take access directly off these
collector streets. Therefore, it seems inconsistent, particularly at the
intersection of two collector streets within Edenvele's northwest area,
to utilize the collector streets as access roads.
'The street right-of-way width for the proposed cul-de-sacs of 44 feet
would not allow on-street parking for these units. Likewise, the
cul-de-sac radius of 50 ft. right-of-way and 40 ft. radius to the curb
line of the street presents some problem with the way the units are
oriented. (Refer to sketch) As you can see, the driveways overlap
when they meet at the curb line and in many cases, provide less than
the required driveway width for a normal two-car garage, let alone
the problem of snow removal and the piling of the snow. The minimum
Village standards for lot width at cul-de-sac of a detached unit is
50 ft. , when dealing with a 50 ft. radius right-of-way. This is a
performance standard based upon the necessary room between the
driveways of homes located on cul-de-sacs for utility easement space,
visual green area, and snow piling during the wintertime. This leaves
only a distance of less than 20 feet between driveways with that
Edenvale 7th Addition
Page 3
• arrangement. In my opinion and the Village Engineer's opinion, 50 ft.
is the minimum for adequate service on public streets within any
subdivision, even on a clustered, single family home, being a detached
residence. I also believe that visually looking at the clustered home
area from a cul-de-sac would be rather dull and monotonous given the
tremendous amount of asphalt paving that would be necessary to make
the proposed plat workable.
The proximity of units to each other, i.e., distance between facing
walls, seems to me to he very tight in certain areas, particularly with
the two cul-de-sac units fronting each other and, at the extremes,
where the units front onto adjacent properties. The concept behind
the clustered single family on a small lot, I believe, does not Involve
putting units within 60 ft. fronting on to each other. The Idea of
smaller, private lots reducing the wasted space and side yards will
produce significant grouped open space that is usable by all of the
residents. Also, the orientation of the units is very critical for the
success of such a project. Just as with townhouse projects where the
view or the omni-directional unit must have good vistas from the one
viewing side, likewise the clustered single family is the same. The .
limited side yard space or patio space is warranted if there is the
evailibility of an uncluttered and open view in one direction, or there
is significant plant screening or hill Jonas. In my opinion, the distances
proposed in this plat of 60 ft. between buildings in two instances and
64 ft. in others is not consistent with the concept of the patio house.
Likewise, in the ends of the cul-de-sac, the units that are 20 ft. and
3E1 ft. from property lines will undoubtedly be fronting onto other units
in very close proximity. To the west, the Hipp's units are located
apprcximately 90 ft. from the front of the units proposed. The three
northern units would seem to he acceptable if the wooded character
and the hill form are preserved, but the lower units are at the same
grade with what will 1)0 a limited amount of vegetation between them.
Also, the direct parallel views not oriented askew of each other is not
the ideal planning approach.
To give you a feel for the comparison, in the single family plats that we
have approved for normal 13,500 sq.ft. lots, an average depth would be
approximately 100 ft. by 90 ft. wide. If two of those are back-to-back,
the distance between the normal house,given the 30 ft. setback and a
25'tt. deep house, would be 190 feet between structures parallelling
each other. We realize that in the denser, or clustered housing arrange-
ments, 190 ft. may not be possible due to the economics of the area.
Ilowever, the 6 0 ft. dimension does seem to me to be a considerable
• amount below an acceptable minimum, which may be somewhere in the
. i
Edenvale 7th Addition
Page 4
range of 100 - 130 ft., assuming a flat, unobstructed view. Also,
without detailed design and, in fact,any design that I have of these +f
units, I cannot tell if the orientation of bedroom to living room or
living room to living room is a factor or not. I believe the distances
are much too tight on the prime viewing sides of these units.
11
The workability of the plan presented, both economically and engi-
neering-wise, is most certainly possible. I feel a more important
questions is one of quality of life and what amenities are being
built in within close proximity to these units or the units themselves.
It is true that Edenvale has extensive open space trail systems and
significant public park dedications: however, I do not believe that that
concept is consistent with the concept of locating units that are not
able to stand on their own, in terms of desirability of site planning.
Proximity to larger open spaces does entitle the developers to develop
their residential areas at a higher density that would normally be
allowed within a standard single family area. However, that higher
density must be done with an equal degree of sensitivity to the needs
of the individual. Along that vein, thorn is a substantial need for
semi-personal open space adjacent to each of the units. If you will
remember in the Edenvale 6th Addition, the single family subdivision,
we had asked that the developers because of the distance to open space
areas, should provide approximately 200-250 sq.ft. area for open field
game/child play space. This space was felt to be significant to have
a sandlot softball game or a game of tag or whatever for children, or
young adults of semi-active recreation. That was in a single family
subdivision of `_3.5 lots. In dealing with the clustered or townhouse
areas, these areas are expected in any project. Granted, the scale of
the 30 unit clustered area may not provide such a large space a s would
be expected in an 80 acre subdivision. However, the availability of
such a space near these residences is equally important.
The original submission indicates an area defined with easement lines
as tot-lot, which is a triangle approximately 100 ft. by 110 ft. in scale
which would most certainly offer the tot-lot area. The recent letter
and sketch which you have received indicates that the tot-lot area
would be eliminated and a 10 ft. pedestrian easement would be included
down the center, thereby eliminating that space and putting the private
yards to that walkway. With the small lots and extremely tight
configuration of this plat, I would not recommend the elimination of the
quasi-public space for recreational areas and, in fact, I would encourage
the enlargement of that space to fullfill the needs of those residents in
close proximity to their homes. As we know, the idea of grouped open
•
Edenvale 7th Addition
Page 5
space makes a great deal of sense if there are smaller open spaces
that are usable for informal activities near the units. The units them-
selves provide the private, clustered patio space on the side yard
between that and the other unit,which is an excellent private outdoor
room. However, the next scale space which is the small scale or
tot-lot open space area, will not be provided in the amended proposal.
The unit described on this plat and presented at the meeting with a water
color rendering appeared to be a rather attractive and well-designed unit.
However, since I have not received any floor plans, elevations, or
schematic diagrams of these units, I cannot comment on their relation-
ship to the site nor their relationship to each unit as proposed in the
plat. Likewise, Mr. Zachman's letter dated March 9, 1973, amending
the original submission asked that the homeowner's association for
the 30 unit cluster be eliminated and that function be taken over by
the Edenvale Association. This should have Harlan Perbix's opinion
on as well as the Edenvale's new council. The second amendment
offers that the original proposal for e double car garage would he amended
to include the single car garage and the double car garage as an option.
This would be acceptable to the Village it it is acceptable to Edenvale,
which requires in their single family and townhouse projects a two car •
garage space, if my understanding is correct. I believe the reasoning
that Mr. Zachman uses for they reduction from a two to one car garage,
which is "I don't anticipate that we would sell any houses with single
car garages;however, it does help in merchandising to quote the lower
price." It does not seem like the most appropriate reason for elimination
of a two car garage merely to attract buyers with the lower price, which
they will through en option add on to. As a planning solution, this
would not be acceptable reasoning. However, the one car garage is
acceptable by the Village standards.
4_ Recommendations:
A.. Recommend the changes suggested by the Village Engineering Depart-
ment to conform with our standards for roadway easement and drainage
areas.
13_ Recommend that a minimum distance between any two structures
fronting on other structure s be no less than 130 ft. and should be
greater where possible.
C . That a tot-lot or open space area would be provided in the central
area if the project is approved and redesigned, that is, of usable
• size for the functions intended.
•
Fdenvale 7th Addition
Page 6
D. That units in lot 31 and 30 that front directly onto the Woodland
Drive have a back yard distance between road right-of-way and
structure much greater than 30 ft. as indicated.
E. That the two units that would front onto Woodhill Drive be
redesigned to utilize the interior street systems, or be used for
another purpose.
F. That the siting of any units that would require tree removal be
field staked so that significant tree species are preserved and
that units are movable to preserve major tree stands.
G. Recommend disapproval of the rezoning to RM 6.5 based upon the
Edenvale 7th Addition plat of 31 lots and the March 9, 1973,
amendments proposed by Zachman Homes for the reason mentioned
in the Staff Report and Engineering Report.
H. Recommend disapproval of the submitted preliminary plat for the
Edenvale 7th Addition of 30 lots proposed by Zachman Homes
based upon the Planning and Engineering Staff Reports.
DP
• 1 of 2
VILLAGE OF LU:=11 PPAIRIE
ENGT.NEll fik REPORT
TO: Planning F, Zoning Guild ssion DATE March 19, 1973
Carl Jul 1ie, Vi 1 1 agJ Engineer
G:�J Edenvale 7th Addition Review of Prel iminary Plat
!_OCAri07i SW Quadrant of Woodhill Drive and Woodland Drive (Sec. 4)
OWNER/DEVELOPER Eden Land Corp.
Applicant: Zachman Homes
ENGINEER Landmark Planning & Engineering Co._
* - * * ** * ** * * * * * * !: * * * :< * * * * * * * * * * ** * .** * *
P:iUPOS4L: See Planning Staff Report dated 3/16/73. Applicant requests RIM 6.5
zoning and approval of preliminary plat.
faiCi;ETRICS: (lot. dimensions, easnananis end right of-taa/)
Recommend the following:
1. All lots should have 50' minimum at the street R/W and 70' at the
building l ine._�
2. Street R/W should be 50' minimum with 50' radii on cul-de-sacs.
_ 3. 10' drainage easements should be shown between buildings.
4. An easement for loopinj he watermain between the cul-de-sacs should
_ __be indicated. _ _
2of2
GRAn';: Street grades are O.K. Typical street section not shown.
Recommend concrete curb and gutter and full d pth asphalt design for streets. _
pU"LIC UTILITIES: ",. --_-- -----__---Sanitary Sewer__The alignment of sewer on Woodhill_Court_should be changed_to "__
provide straight lines between manholes,_
Watermain: The proposed network is unacceptable, looping_should be_provided__
between the cul-de-sacs. _ +_
Storm Sewer: Catch basins should be provided at the intersection of Woodland—_
Court and Woodland Drive. Arrows indicating drainage patterns from each lot
should he shown. _—.
Recommend denial of the applicants reguest for approval of the
prel iminary_plat of Edenvale 7th Addition, The applicant should be referred_to _"
the Village Planner and Engineer for necessary_revisions of the_proposedplat and
preliminay utility plans.
Respectf 1yi su bmi ttad,
j (J r
Carl J. ,l 1iie, P.E.
Village Engineer
J
•
DATE: April 6, 1973
TO: Mayor and Members of Village Council
FROM: John Frane, Finance Director
SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS --
ROSEMOUNT ENGINEERING
Resolution No. 683 is the first step in the required procedure for
issuing M.I.D.B.'s and indicates to the State Department of
Economic Development, which must approve the sale of M.I.D.B.'s,
the Village's interest in the project.
This project will benefit the Village and Rosemount. We are looking
forward to working with Rosemount on this project. They are, in my
opinion, an excellent company with a proven track record of success.
JF:kg
3-;A
r
•
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 596
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING GUIDELINES FOR
MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BONDS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Vil lege of Eden Prairie,
County of Hennepin, Minnesota as follows:
THAT the following guidelines are adopted in considering an industry's
request to issue Municipal Industrial Development Bonds,
1. Only new construction or plant expansion amounting to S500,000
or more would be eligible for financing through Municipal Industrial
Development Bonds.
2. Complete set of audits for two previous years must be provided.
3. A copy of Dun and Bradstreet's most recent Rating Report must be
provided.
4. There must be"minimum coverage" of 2 X the Principal and Interest
due earned annually the previous year before taxes. For example,
a $1,300,000 bond issue requires approximately$125,000 in annual
principal and interest. Therefore, $250,000 must have been earned
before taxes by the company the previous year. There must also be br
a demonstrated record of yearly increases in earnings before taxes.
5. The fair market rental value of the building must equal to or exceed :
the total amount of bonds and interest die. An appraisal may be
required to verify fair market rental value.
6. Administrative and legal costs to issue the bonds will be paid by
the applicant industry.
ADOPTED by the Village Council at a regular Coun meeting October
10, 1972. o
ata
out R. Redpath, yor
ATTEST:
SEAL
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk "'A'
, +r,ti
RogerBoer er
Member B B introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 683
RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A
PROJECT UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
ACT, REFERRING THE PROPOSAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROVAL,AND AUTHORIZING
PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, as follows:
It is hereby found, determined, and declared as follows:
1.1 The welfare of the State of Minnesota requires active promotion, attraction,
encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce through
governmental acts to prevent so far as possible emergence of blighted lands and areas of
chronic unemployment, and the state has encouraged local government units to prevent such
economic deterioration;
1.2 Rosemount Inc., a Minnesota corporation(hereinafter, the Company), is
considering constructing and equipping an addition to its presently existing building in the
Village,designed, suitable and to be used for manufacturing, handling, storing,warehousing,
processing and shipping products of manufacture, consisting primarily of measurement and
control instruments, principally temperature and pressure sensors;
1.3 The proposed improvements in the Village would add to the tax base of the
Village and overlapping taxing authorities, would increase employment and add to the level
of economic activity in the area, and enhance the reputation or image of the Village as a
desirable location for suitable industries;
1.4 The Village has been advised by representatives of the Company that
conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital cost of the project is available only
on a Iimited basis and at high costs of borrowing. The Company has also advised this
Council that with the aid of municipal financing, and its resulting low borrowing cost, the
project is economically more feasible;
1.5 This Council has been advised by a representative of Paine Webber Jackson
&Curtis, Inc. of Minneapolis, Minnesota, investment bankers and dealers in municipal
bonds, that on the basis of information submitted to them and their discussions with representa-
tives of the Company and potential buyers of tax-exempt bonds, industrial development
revenue bonds of the Village could be issued and sold upon favorable rates and terms;
1.6 The Village is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, to issue its
revenue bonds to finance capital projects consisting of properties used and useful in
connection with a revenue-producing enterprise, such as that of the Company, engaged or
to be engaged in manufacturing, handling, storing, warehousing,processing and shipping
products of manufacture and the issuance of such bonds by the Village would be a substantial
inducement to the Company to expand itc existing facility within the Village.
2. On the basis of information given the Village to date, it appears that it would
be In the best interest of the Village to issue its industrial development revenue bonds under
the provisions of Chapter 474 to finance the project described above at a cost presently
estimated to be approximately$1,500,000.
3. The project and bond issue above referred to are hereby given preliminary
approval by the Village, subject to approval of the project by the Commissioner of
Economic Development and to the mutual agreement of this body, the Company and the
initial purchasers of the bonds as to the details of the bond issue and provisions for their
payment. In all events, it is understood, however, that the bonds of the Village shall not
constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance legal or equitable upon any property of the
Village except the project,and each bond, when, as, and if issued, shall recite in substance
that the bond including interest thereon is payable solely from the rentals received from the
project and property pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the
Village.
4. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes,Section 474.01, Subdivision 7, the
Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the project to the
Commissioner of Economic Development, for his approval of the project. The Mayor,
Village Clerk, Village Attorney, and other officers, employees and agents of the Village
are hereby authorized to provide the Commissioner with any preliminary information he
may need for this purpose,and the Village Attorney is authorized to initiate and assist in
the preparation of such documents as may be appropriate to the project, if it is approved
by the Commissioner. The Company is hereby authorized to incur expenses and make
capital expenditures subject to reimbursement out of bond proceeds,when, as and if,
such bonds are issued.
Mayor
Attest:
Village Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded
by MemberWolfgang Penzel, and the following voted in favor thereof:
Paul Redpath, Roger Boerger, John McCulloch, Wolfgang Penzel end Joan Meyers.
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
-2-
• Rosemount Inc. / Annual Report 1972
OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS
1972 1971•
moo omitted)
Sales $19,012 $15,324
Pre-tax Operating Income 2,224 1,587
Operating Net Income . ... 1,030 830
Operating Net Income per Share .. 1.36 1.12
Backlog ......_.. 9,853 8,743
Capital Expenditures ... .. 619 509
Depreciation .._.. 337 299
Number Shares Outstanding ... ... 773 744
Number of Employees .. .. 972 846
THE OPERATING PROFIT PICTURE
Instrument Operating Profit .. $ 942 S 857
Non-Instrument Operating Net Income(loss) . .. .. .. 88 (27)
'Operating Income excludes the cumulative effect(as of begin- for previously deferred research end development costs.See
ning of fiscal year 191t)of change In method of accounting note 3 of financial statements.
The Rosemollllrlt Story
Rosemount,founded in 1956,is a product of the aero- aerospace functions. While Rosemount's share of in-
space era of the late Fifties and Sixties.Rosemount dustrial markets grows,the company's role in its tradi-
technology was first applied to instruments on early tional markets also is growing.
high-speed jet aircraft,and later refined and applied on Recognizing its expanding role, Rosemount Engi-
virtually every U.S.space mission. Today,Rosemount neering Company became Rosemount Inc.during fiscal
continues to find new applications for its instruments 1972. This will help identify Rosemount as a firm
and systems,in a growing number of industries. From which not only engineers instruments, but produces
jet aircraft and space,Rosemount technology has grown and sells them on a multi-industrial, multi-national
to encompass the measurement and control of pipeline scale.And the company's new corporate symbol(the
flow,synthetic textile processes, nuclear and convert- Annual Report cover subject) is let in the triangle, a
tional power generation, and other peacetime, non- geometric shape signifying transition and change.
2
l
A
Rosemount
ROSEMOUNT INC.,12001 WEST 78th STREET/EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55343/TEL:(812)941.5560
TWX:910-576-3103,TELEX: 29-0183
: ,.
111111
iilliilll
1
I
t
SITE LOCATION MAP
TO MIMKAPOUI I
TO 100KWAY, \ A 1 i
; /
'� OLO ..INW.T `lI
SQ(0,
P '' ' I
MNMIWAV 5 04
/ ; .....=....
TO CNANAiO;N '1
"/ CT-) To OMMIA
OIMII PRAM
0130
■( n tint million Juller lnnlit
■Sole.1110id,eol 21', .hia rtr\+hl;;h.
PROGRESS:
■S,de.t encl) nl,uktt,Ini ed,SO', ,I n S;.'_nulliun.
Fiscal 1972 • Lu e,t.ulslrmdu,lrial prierpr,Tram(h,e‘eeedSI nullionlfrorth,'On tint,If)drul-lectrie
I'iier( muul..nm ern,pe lulvrd in,trun1rnh in a nuelear grncraUn +Ltlnm.
IN()poling Otlire nek,,.Ili.utilk:es III I[mope:wrl duce inthtl'S
•Order hooking. ut S2(11110.0(10, ncvo high.
■S,des ue+i air nlal.l,n,lcnl.lur rentuteh.pllnled Clnele.(RP,,I.
Millie lir,'rnitluR \I)anllr:i t.
• nhnketrereplion, f R(11OI',1\l 1 S,nlrnahlenllicep.lrlition,manutactured
b+kn.rnunuu I':ulitnon,.Inc.
• the'minim i t .h.irehodders inirc,lsed lit ne.nI)4(1', ,luapprarim:rt _Ii 1,400.
■Uuahticalinn Inr \anun,ll O\ r(Irc-('ounler Wing,
SALES ANALYSIS BY MARKET
(000 OMITTED)
1972 1971 1970 190 1969 1967
To Our Shareholders and Employees:
Fiscal 1972 was a very good year for Rosemount. We had record sales exceeding $19
million,and logged our first million-dollar profit year. Results were over 20%ahead of 1971.
We always have stressed the importance of people at Rosemount. Too often, acknowl-
edgement of their importance is only incidentally mentioned or even ignored.Because our growth
and success is so highly dependent on the performance and loyalty of our employees,we wish to
first recognize them.
Rosemount sells a wide variety of highly technical instruments to many different mar-
kets.In order to grow and to be successful,people at all levels must analyze situations, make
commitments,and take action.Our good results for last year were made possible by Rosemount
people throughout the world performing at a very high level.We recognize this contribution,
and we extend our sincere thanks.
Our plan for growth has been to apply aerospace technologies to industrial markets,and
to become a major factor in those markets.With approximately$7 million in industrial instru-
ment sales for 1972, we cannot say that we are yet a major factor in those markets,or that our
plan is complete.But we can report good progress,and that in itself is unique:Few,if any,aero-
space companies have been able to make this transition.
Our transition from heavy aerospace dependency is not being achieved through aban-
donment of our traditional markets.We're pleased to report good growth and support in these
areas.Sales from defense and space markets were upfrom$6.6 million to approximately PPr y$7.9
million,about 42% of the total sales.
Commercial aviation sales were up 17%,to$2.7 million. We estimate there are some
3,600 commercial aircraft flying with Rosemount instruments on board.This represents a good
replacement market for us,and gives a prospect for continuing good sales.
Total industrial instrument sales were up 23%, to nearly $7 million.Our increase re-
sulted largely from increased sales to energy markets.Nuclear and conventional power plants,
natural gas transmission,and petroleum refining are the major components of our energy mar-
ket. Energy shortages, and damages to our environment, are creating additional demands for
our instruments.
We've had excellent reception of ROTOPANELS, our line of movable office partitions
for "officescaping."This resulted in substantial growth in sales and earnings for Rosemount
Partitions,Inc.
Uniflo Systems Company(USC) received and completed its first government contract
for $98,000. The work performed was well-received by the Department of Transportation
4
•I /
! 11 !
11
_ t
... asp-•— _
MANAGEMENT TEAM (from left):Donald M.Sullivan,vice president;
Robert W.Hanson,secretary-treasurer;William L.Murray,vice president;
Vernon H.Heath,president;Richard V.DeLeo,vice president,and Willard
L. (Pete)Moline,senior vice president.Inset: Barry Rogal,managing ad-
ministrator,Rosemount A.G.,Switzerland.
(DOT),and follow-up work is being negotiated.USC is still operating at a loss,but there was
improvement over 1971.
One of our primary targets for future growth is the international market. In 1972,inter-
national sales increased to$4.2 million, or 22% of our total sales.We opened five new sales
offices in Europe.This investment will continue in 1973.We also will invest in additional activi-
ties in Canada,Brazil and Mexico.
During the year we purchased the remaining 5% minority interest in our English sub-
sidiary.The purchase was from Barry Rogal,founder of the II-year-old English company.He
now is based in Zug, Switzerland and from there directs overall Rosemount European opera-
tions. Our English company has consistently earned good profits.Our new sales offices,plus
England's entry into the Common Market, should expand their operations.
During 1972,changes in international currency values caused a net reduction in earn-
ings of 5 cents per share,compared with a 6 cents per-share increase in 1971.
We are pleased that,starting in January, Rosemount is listed in the National Over-the-
Counter daily stock quotations in The Wall Street Journal, and some thirty other major news-
papers around the U.S. Our NASDAQ symbol is ROSM.
VERNON H.HEATH
PRESIDENT
5
Ontario Hydro Project—
Employee Involvement in a Large Program 414110
.Me a],1112
— llornuant Mincer..NW., r—w.4 w.. r
Ilml Meet MN etre.t
02011 M UNN,Mu..ota d.a. Mlle
nttepumh R.v,1.tn-rt.ian(
i °rr ur.i
Among the many important events of the past year, ausualasir.ta.
none was more significant than the award and successful .nigh to=vend your..son,1M its pM.f..ce
initial delivery of the largest set of industrial orders ever ;.a°a 'er,q .en w aka.r.°t.r.Iv
received by Rosemount.The orders,from the Hydro Eke- •.,.ill,..neer.er.ne ere..,to Imon u.t
tric Power Commission of Ontario,Canada,totalled more ; " NieNd ` ti .' >"'van: .W d�ercialoper: on ty U 1 , 11u;
Nat ant.rue halt..Nee operating at lull poor Made j.
than one-half million dollars. 'They were for platinum re- la......bad no..,...fall..paean.. t
sistance temperature sensors for the Bruce and Pickering „her pof...n'.of.a.product clear ter.
flactioe of N.MO gu.l.t,of...feature pia yw
nuclear generating stations.The first shipments were made aai.wa and of eno c.n.lde boa eff.to of gar 410441040
..nt..nl....i.t... r.ter...rum a,aufa r
in April, 1972.The first unit went on-line in May.The -a.of them-.p.r.tlm our. rear-m -t.ti• wave r-Meow.
importance of Rosemount employees in this achievement e.11 a r.0sua: yes.: ' 'rre 0 t':tl:tin meter
is illustrated by the letter from Ontario Hydra's J.G.Stipp. unit..and mt erne•aererati.Station.
Drawing upon its experience in the design and man- 'f
facture of precision platinum temperature sensors for space
programs such as Apollo and Saturn,the Company used a of P00002000.1y
project team concept to sut cessfuly perform this contract. Products !
The highlights of the program are described here by the
people who completed the job.Their stories demonstrate
Rosemount's capacity—in people and technology—to in- ,
plement•a strategy of diversification among several instru-
mentation markets.
1."Shortly after the first contract award for the Bruce eta- 4
tion,Ontario Hydro placed another order for its Pickering
3 and 4 units,and asked for delivery in 16 weeks,a very -
short span for such equipment.This accelerated delivery
requirement dictated day-to-day coordination between On-
tario Hydro and Rosemount, as technical and contractual
terms were finalized."
Murray Willer,Willer Engineering Ltd.—
Canadian Representative ..,...........--:
2."The Ontario Hydro sensors were to be of the highest
accuracy—r °F while operating at 600°F.Plant efficiency ;,,
was to be governed by their readings. The sensors also
were to be of the utmost reliability,because protection of
the plant was to be maintained by the measured tempera- +}
cure values.The many hours of design, testing and quality
inspections ware guided by Design Engineering and coor-
dinated with the customer by Marketing."
Dick LzSell,Marketing(right),and 1110
11,1tet s v- ,4
Les Anderson,Design Engineering "
6
s.
3
•
3."Since first shipments were to be made within 16 weeks S."Vibration testing to 5,000 cycles-per-second,on the
after receipt of the order,the Ontario Hydro sensor posed temperature sensors in lengths up to ten feet,was just one
special challenges to purchasing.We needed high-quality of many environmental tests used in the program.A par-
components quickly.Most important of these components ticularly difficult problem in this case was that this vibra-
were a connector which acted as the interface between our tion was to be done at the actual operating temperature—
sensor and the power source, and a minerally insulated 600°F."
cable which insulated the wires running between the con- Earl Bergdahl(left)and Don Matychulc,
nector and the actual sensing element.Both were extremely Environmental Testing
critical items which had to be capable of withstanding the
hot,humid atmosphere of the reactor." 6."At the beginning of each day's production, a sample
Ken Garin(left)and John Kenny,Purchasing was made of each weld on the sensor.The welds then were
cross-sectioned,mounted in plastic,and polished to expose
the joint.The production process cannot begin until each
weld is found to have acceptable penetration without flnws."
4."To achieve the quality and reliability required of the Weldon Makela(seated),Metallurgical Lab,and
sensors for Ontario Hydro,new techniques of assembly had Glenn Monson, Quality Control
to be used.One of these techniques is the use of a'pro-
grammed'welder to make the many weld joints on each 7."Packaging for the order also was unique.A method of
sensor.The production operator sets the program specified physical and environmental protection was necessary to
by Production Engineering for each weld by dialing in a allow the product to be shipped and inspected without
series of panel adjustments.He then positions the welding damage.Rosemount personnel developed a versatile con-
electrode in the correct location and starts the welder.The miner which would provide the physical and environmental
machine takes over and makes the weld,controllisg the protection for units from two to eleven feet long,yet only
current to the preset profile." one eighth inch in diameter."
' Bob Dickey,Production Engineering(standing),and Floyd Carlson,Ted Inouye,and Bob Fischer (from left),
Jerry Johnson,Production Traffic and Shipping
•
Growth and Potential by Instrument Market
Since 1967,Rosemount has pursued a strategy of market diversification
based on its proven instrumentation expertise.The graphs show the results of
that policy.Further insight into the future prospects of the market segments, ft
and the Company position in each,is presented here.
I
DEFENSE AND SPACE tt�
Ion Im 170 ION 1911 IN7
42%of 1972 Sales •
Prospects 2%Annual Sales Growth,1967-1972
In the defense area,a new emphasis is anticipated on largely for reconnaissance and electronic counter-measures.
peacetime, deterrent weapons. Current projections esti- In Europe,the Multi-Range Combat Aircraft—a coopera-
mate that U.S.Defense Department expenditures will rise tive venture among the United Kingdom, France, West
by 2-5% per year for the next five years.With the cease- Germany and Italy—is just entering into the pre-production
fire in Vietnam,there should be a switch in funding from stages.
ordnance and manpower to new hardware development, The U.S.space program,a source of much of Rose-
and subsequent production. mount's technology, is starting to slowly revive as the
For example, the F-15 and YF 16/17 air superiority Space Shuttle Program begins.Awards to sub-contractors
fighters, F-SE Freedom Fighters,A-l0 close support air- such as Rosemount,however,will not be made until late
craft,and B-I strategic bomber,are all in the development 1973 for shipment in 1975 and beyond.There is still con-
or early production stages. Another area of concentration siderable debate over the priority of the Shuttle,so the tim-
is Remotely Piloted Vehicles (RPV's or drones) used ing and size of potential contracts are uncertain.
Rosemount's Position
By providing instruments of the highest precision, cancellation of one or two of the programs, shipments
Rosemount has earned its position as the leading supplier should grow at a modest rate through 1974.and accelerate
of air data sensors for military aircraft.These sensors are beginning in 1975.
used to measure air speed,temperature,altitude,and icing
conditions.
The Company has extended its interest to sensors for
angle-of-attack,an extremely important measurement for
both weapons delivery systems and flight safety.
*
Building on its measurement technology, Rosemount s .. liar
began to supply small analog air data computer modules
for the RPV markets in 1970.This has proved to be a '
sound tactic,and in the last three years,contracts for com-
puter modules on six RPV's have been received,with large-
scale production scheduled to begin in 1974. Fairchild Industries'A-10,carrying Rosemount air data in-
In summary, Rosemount's defense and space market struments is deslpgrcd for dose in support of ground forces.
This contract was the first awarded by the U. S.Air Fora
potential appears encouraging.Even allowing for possible through a competitive"lyof."
• 8
O I\n•:K(IAI,AV I.-VI ION
1972 1971 1970 1969 1966 1967
COMMERCIAL $2,715 2,328 1,886 2,432 2,626 1,669
AIRCRAFT I
14% of 1972 Sales
1(1'4 Annual Sales Growl11. 1967-1972
1'rosperts
the early I970's hue been\e'al. of transition in coin- lancing 47,tolluued hs the \IeI)unnell 1).wglas UC-10
rnereial aciauon. I he NMI*. had seen a sieidih InereIl,ne ,Intl Lockheed I-101 I
market for Jet tr:unpons. Iucled he a rapid expansion in lie result is that sex,.aircraft production has dropped
air rr;oel. In I4h6• sonic (,S11 lets wrrr built in the I' to Tess than hull the 1468 peak. and Is expected to stay
alone. there.
Simultaneous,side the Ilaliening sat ;air lrnel growth. For the next sexeral years,airlines will be phrasing out
resulting Iron the 1971L'I ieessitill. the Hen high-soloing the Boeing 71)7 and DC-8., and switching to Feuer, but
jumbo as were introduced. the lint of these was the more ellieicnt,Jumbos.
Rosein(11nrt,x 1'(!x!lloll
Iwo!actors'mittatethat the connrrereaal,niationVW. (hen3,61)11 jets sou inservice111 soithequipment
Eel ss iIl continue to he important to kssen,,mn made by Rosemount,and the(olnpany has been secs
Since first penetrating the market In 195S with the succcsslul in expanding its replacement brininess
total iemperauue sensor used on the hoeing 7)17 for through aegressise marketing, esen where it was not
encase control. Rosenw,unt ha, g.uned :ul inereesinv the original equipment manulaetufer.
,unoum,f husinrss her pile I irexample. the junho \e\s orders reeciied in 1972 were 25' greater than
lets use an ;nerarn o1 :th ur 4(,.I1011 of Rosennnun those in 1971. Although 19'2 was us exceptionally good
equipment.cringed h, SISlln„n the 711' I he trend rear.MIL' that rack u1 incfense,+ou'I he quie kh repeated,
is exen more drunatie on the I French Con- steadilc continuing growth is expected as :e result of the
come sriper,ntetr.unpe,rl ulucll edifies S50.11111)n1 laelotsahoae.
Rosemount gear.
h x ar
r.,
, .. ,
Al lASTaAN
!More than 1.01111 Bocmg - - world.,Loges unnme!dal
heel Its w tip Rosemount out d.aa srnson
9
ENERGY 11+72 1071 1170 11111111 lira 11117
ra
17%of 1972 Sales
Prospects 42%Annual Sales Growth,1967-1972
America and the nations of Western Europe face the Oil provides about 40% of U.S.energy,and here the
combined problems of shortage and possible damage to immediate problem is excessive reliance on imports and its
the environment—not only from the generation of dee- possible effects on U.S. security and balance of payments.
tricity,but from increased use of natural gas,oil and other Another problem, accentuated by today's low-polluting
energy sources_ but also low-efficiency automobile engines,is the tight po-
Natural gas is receiving the most attention currently, sition in refinery capacity due to the hiatus of the last five
both in government and industry. Natural gas consump- years in major expansion and construction of new plants.
Lion has outstripped production in recent years,and sizable The need for more electrical generating capacity has
price increases are in the offing as a result.It seems certain been well documented by the annual increase in consump-
that imported gas(shipped in liquefied form via 70,000- Lion of 7-9% in the major industrial nations. It seems
ton tankers)arid substitute"natural"gas(made from pe- certain that virtually all new plants will be nuclear or coal-
trolelun naphtha in refinery-like plants),will be needed in fired, as natural gas and oil are diverted to higher-value
increasing quantities merely to hold supplies at today's uses such as residential heating, gasoline fuel,and petro-
level. chemical production.
Rosemount's Position
Taking advantage of its capabilities as a supplier of
accurate measuring instruments,Rosemount began to de-
velope a plan for the energy markets in 1967,with the first
significant sales made to fossil-fueled electrical generating
stations in the United Kingdom. By 1970, the Company
had secured a small but growing position as a supplier of
critical temperature measurement instruments to the nu-
clear element of the U.S. electrical utility business.
Shipments to the energy markets became more signifi- t
cant in 1971 with the first deliveries of"ALPHALINE"
pressure and flow transmitters for refineries.This is par-
ticularly important because the potential for pressure and
flow instrumentation is more than twice that of tempera- t'
Lure in these markets.
Although R.osemount's shipments to the energy mar-
kets are rapidly growing, the Company must still be re-
garded as a small factor, with about 5-10% of the
business.Viewed from a different perspective,however,it
seems that there is ample room for continuation of the
recent growth. The acceleration of investment in new fa- Shell Tankers U.K.Ltd.SS Gadinia,one of the growing LNG
cilities,caused by the recognition of the energy shortage, traker fleet.Rosemount EngineerinK Company,(.incited sup-
ramsB position. i WT.
the tempe meanunng equipment for operations at
Ives even more credence to this
10
PROCESS AND MANUFACTURING
1072 11m 1110 111119 INS //li
19%of 1972 Sales
15%Annual Sales Growth,1967.1972
Prospects
This generalized category encompasses the balance of Japanese fiber markets remain depressed with no market
Rosemount's industrial instrumentation business.It spans recovery in immediate sight.
diverse markets from agricultural feed plants to turbine The fluid process market encompasses such identifiable
engines for trucks.The two largest segments are the syn- industries as paper and chemical,and a host of others less
thetic fibers/plastics industries, and the fluid process familiar.Both the paper and chemical industries have had
market. their recent attention focused on pollution abatement.This
Consumption of synthetic fibers and plastics continues has absorbed much of the capital equipment dollar.It now
to steadily grow at a rate of 7.10% per year. New capital appears that the paper industry is approaching 95% of
expenditures in both areas, however, are quite cyclical. capacity utilization, at which point planning begins for
This gives them a degree of uncertainty not found in most expansions and new plants.The situation in the chemical
of Rosemount's other markets.U.S. markets have been industry is not as clear,either in Western Europe or the
depressed for the past several years,but both now seem to U.S., and Rosemount does not look for rapid growth in
be entering a period of resurgence.Western European and either area in the near future.
Rosemount's Position
Shipments to the fibers and plastics markets grew rap-
idly from 1968 to 1970,but have been rather flat since. X a
New product developments which did not meet with good
acceptance were partially responsible.Another factor is 4 . -
that in both markets the Company is supplying complete t. t
systems—both measurement and control instruments— G;,
and this expansion in scope has proven more difficult than ;.
expected.The
1973-74 period will be critical for Rosemount in /I
both areas.New orders booked in 1972 were 12%ahead fi~V!
of 1971,which is a good beginning. ,
The fluid process industry only began to be of poten •
-
tial importance when Rosemount began selling flow,level - .-"• --"G , -
and pressure instrumentation.Temperature is a minor con-
cern in most of these plants.Although the growth in busi-
ness 71K three at of the Salt River Project's fossB•fueled Navajo
station at Page.Nev will have a ccaapp+acc'�ttyy of 2,250 mepwatu
has been good,and the market for its products is when completed.Rosemount's"ALPfiALINE"pressure trans-
large(over$200,000,000 in the U.S. and Europe),Rose- mutters were selected for a portion of the station by Bechtel
mount is still a minor factor in the marketplace.The widely °r4°rauon the consulunit enQioeer.The Soh River projrd is
josh undertafkirr`of Aruona Pubinc Service ompany,the
varying trends of the many industrial segments make pro- City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power.Nevada
jections for the future difficult. Power Company,and Tucson Gas and Electric Company.
11
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
ASSETS
1972 1971
Current meets:
Cash and time deposits ..............._.., $ 438,440 259,183
Marketable securities,at cost(approximate,market) _ .,. 1,262,664 974,263
Accounts receivable,less allowance for doubtful receivables
of$57,757 in 1972 and$63,840 In 1971 . ,.... 3,522,446 2,787,394
Inventories:
Raw materials 2,028,844 1,840,575
Work in process 1,362,412 999,685
Finished goods _ ... 735,304 650,577
Total Inventories _ ... 4,126,560 3,490,837
Prepaid expenses 58,125 40,265
Total current assets _ ... 9,408,235 7,551,942
Property,plant and equipment,at cost:
Land 166,560 201,153
Buildings and improvements 2,005,626 1,867,137
Machinery,furniture and equipment...... ....... ..............._ ... 2,849,678 2,352,229
Leasehold improvements _ ... 75,189 58,541
5,097,053 4,479,060
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization . 2,136,020 1,800,700
Net property,plant and equipment.. 2,961,033 2,878,360
Investment In G.H.Bass&Co.,at cost....... ....... _ .., 591,000 591,000
Patents and goodwill 136,888 80,426
Sundry deferred charges and other assets.... ....... ..... 161,634 135,416
$13,258,790 11,017,144
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
12
ROSEMOUNT INC.AND SUBSIDIARIES October 27,1972 and October 29,1971
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 1972 1971
Current liabilities:
Notes payable by foreign subsidiaries to banks $ 284,873 12,637
Current portion of long-term debt..... ....... 125,000 125,000
Accounts payable 1,215,110 1,000,890
Accrued expenses 1.313,536 1,026,084
Federal,state and foreign income taxes ,,.... _ 883,462 772,459
Total current liabilities .. ....... 3,821,981 2,937,050
Long-term debt—7%promissory note due S125,000 in 1973,
$150,000annually 1974-83,less current portion(note 4) .... 1,500,000 1,625,000
Deferred Federal income taxes........... ....... 133,600 71,148
Minority interest in a subsidiary — 49,889
Shareholders'equity:
Common shares of$.3715 par value per share.Authorized
2,000,000 shares;issued 772,660 shares in 1972
and 744,439 shares in 1971(note 5) 289,748 279,185
Additional capital in excess of par value(note 5) 1,530,999 1,102,529
Retained earnings(note 4) ........._ ....... 5,982,462 4,952,383
Total shareholders'equity...... 7,803,209 6,334,057
Commitments and contingencies(note 7) . . ....... ...
$13,258,790 11,017,144
13
ROSENOUNT INC.AND 818810IARIES
STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS
Years ended October 27,1972 and October 29,1971
1972 1971
Net sales ,,,,, , $19,012,099 15,324,321
Cost of sales 10,385,096 8,400,990
Gross profit .. ....... . .. 8,627,003 8,923,331
Research and development costs ... 847,451 942,288
Selling,general and administrative expenses .... 5,526,107 4,450,480
Total operating expenses...... 6,373,558 5,392,748
Operating Income..... 2,253,445 1,530,583
Other income(deductions)—net,including interest expense of
$133,158 in 1972 and$134,308 in 1971 (note 2) . .. (29,238) 58,444
Income before income taxes... 2,224,207 1,587,027
Provision for Income taxes: I
Federal:
Current 878,000 4439,000
Deterred ,..,, .,,,,,, 87,111 47,313
Slate and foreign ......... ....... ....... 228,997 240,735
1,194,108 757,048
Net Income before cumulative effect of change In method of accounting 1,030,099 829,979
Cumulative effect(as of beginning of fiscal year 1971)of change
in method of accounting for previously deferred
research and development coats(note 3) — (950,832)
Net income(loss)(note 3) ...... _...... 1,030,099 (120,853)
Retained earnings at beginning of year... 4,952,363 5,073,218
Retained earnings at end of year(note 4) . ....... $ 5,982,462 4,952,383
Per common share based on weighted average
number of outstanding shares:
Net income before cumulative effect of change
In method of accounting ...... $ 1.36 1,12
Cumulative effect(as of beginning of fiscal year 1971)of
change in method of accounting for previously
deferred research and development costs(note 3) .... .. — (1.28)
Net income(loss)(note 3) .. ....... ....... $ 1.36 (.18)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
14
it
w0UMOIMT INC.AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL POSITION
Years ended October 27,1972 and October 29,1971
1972 1971
Source of funds:
Net Income before cumulative affect of change
in method of accounting $1,030.099 829,979
Depreciation and amortization of plant and equipment 336,608 296,060
Federal income taxes deferred 62,452 47,313
Other non-cash charges-net, including minority interest.... ........... 37,863 40,072
Funds derived from operations 1,467,022 1,218,224
Proceeds from stock option sold by subsidiary 2,605 52,111
Proceeds from public offering of common shares,net ,.... ........... 296,268 -
Proceeds from common shares sold to employees _ .. .... 140,180 18,413
Other . ........... - 428
$1,906,075 1,285,178
Application of funds:
Additions to property,plant and equipment,less retirements:
Land and buildings..... _.. $ 4,256 (1,029)
Equipment 615,025 510,393
Reduction of long-term debt . _ 125,000 125,000
Purchase of minority interest in a subsidiary 98,192 -
Other 92,240 23,627
increase in working capital .. _...... . ... ... 971,362 627,185
$1,906,075 1,286,176
Changes In working capital:
increase(decrease)In current assets:
Cash and time deposits . _ ....._ ........... $ 179,257 (15,061)
Marketable securities... _.. 288,401 111,384
Receivables,net _ ...................... ........... 735,052 391,676
inventories 635,723 850,577
Prepaid expenses _ .. ........... 17,860 (28,321)
i 1,856,293 1,110,254
increase(decrease)in current liabilities:
Notes payable by foreign subsidiaries to banks ......... ....... .... 272,236 (96,931)
Accounts payable......_ . ........... 214,220 1110,638
Accrued expenses ,,..._ 287,472 118,931
Federal,state and foreign income taxes ..... ........... 111,003 285,231
884,931 489,069
Increase in working capital .._ .. ......... $ 971,362 627,185
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
16
ROSEMOUNT INC.AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
October 27,1972 and October 29,1971
(1)ACCOUNTING POUCIES.A summary of the major Maintenance and Repairs of Properties
accounting policies followed by the Company in prep- The costs of repairs and maintenance and minor
aratlon of the accompanying consolidated financial renewals and betterments are charged to expense
statements is sat forth below: as incurred and costs of new construction or major
renewals and betterments which represent improve-
Basis of Consolidation masts are capitalized as additions to appropriate
The consolidated financial statements include the
asset accounts.
accounts of the Company and all subsidiary compa-
nies. All materiel intercompany transactions have income Taxes
been eliminated and net income has been reduced by Investment tax credits are recorded as a reduction
the portion of the earnings of subsidiaries applicable of income taxes payable in the year the assets are
to minority shareowners. acquired and are deferred for book purposes to be
Translation of Foreign Currencies taken as reductions in provisions for income taxes
over the lives of the related assets.
The financial statements of foreign subsidiaries Provision is made for deferred income taxes appli-
have been translated Into United States dollars at cable to timing differences between book and tax-
appropriate exchange rates as follows: (1)net cur- able income,principally depreciation expense.
rent assets at fiscal year-end rates;(2)fixed assets
and the related accumulated depreciation at rates Net Income Per Shire
prevailing at the time of acquisition;(3) income and Net income per share is calculated by dividing net
expense accounts at average rates during the year; income by the weighted average number of common
and(4)unrealized gains or losses from translation shares outstanding during the year,without consid-
are included in current year results. eration of common share equivalents(stock options)
since the effect of their inclusion is not material.
Inventories
Raw materials inventories are valued at the lower (2)FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES. Net assets of foreign
of average cost or replacement market. Inventories subsidiaries included in the consolidated balance
of work in process and finished garde are valued at sheet aggregated$1,655,138 et October 27,1972 and
the lower of average cost or nel realizable value. $1,226,091 at October 29,1971, including$1,202,572
and$1,106,105,respectively,of net current assets.
Depredation The unrealized gain or loss on exchange from
Depreciation of plant and equipment is provided translation of accounts of foreign subsidiaries into
based on the estimated useful lives of the various United States dollars, included in other Income (de-
assets,using the straight-line method.Declining bat- ductions)in the accompanying statement of confid-
ence methods of depreciation are used in the deter- idated income and retained earnings, was a loss of
mination of income f or tax purposes. approximatety $39,000 ($.05 per common share) for
Estimated useful lives for the principal asset ctassl- the year ended October 27,1972 and a gain of ap-
fications are as follows:buildings and improvements, proximately$42,000($.06 per common share)for the
5 to 40 years;machinery,furniture and equipment,4 year ended October 29,1971.
to 10 years; leasehold Improvements, terms of lease (9)CHANGES IN METHODS OF ACCOUNTING.As of
or less. the beginning of fiscal year 1971,the Company and
Patents and Goodwill two domestic subsidiaries changed their method of
The excess of the cost of investments in certain accounting for research and development costs.
subsidiaries over the value ascribed to the Company's These costs,previously deferred and amortized over
equity in such subsidiaries at the time of acquisition, a five-year period,are now expensed as incurred by
is being amortized over 40-year periods. Patents are the Company and all its subsidiaries. This change
amortized over their estimated useful lives. resulted in a decrease in net income before cumula-
tive effect of change in method of accounting for
Research and Development Costs fiscal year 1971 of approximately$31,000($.04 per
Research and development coals are charged to common share)as compared to the preceding year.
expense as incurred. An adjustment of$950,832, representing previously
16
deferred research and development costs as of the At October 27,1972 there was an option outstand-
beginning of fiscal year 1971 of$1,937,243,less ap- Ing to acquire a 20%interest in Uniflo Systems Corn-
plicable deferred income taxes as of that date of pany,a subsidiary,which,if exercised in full, would
$966,411,has been deducted from Income in the ac- require an add itional payment of approximately
coanpanying statement of consolidated income and $180,000.
retained earnings for fiscal year 1971 to apply retro- At October 27,1972, 27,000 common shares were
actively this new method of accounting.This adjust- reserved for issuance to officers and employees pur-
ment of $950,832 was previously shown in the suant to options granted under the Company's 1965 _
--- Company's 1971 Annual Report to Shareholders as a and 1969 stock option plans and restricted options
deduction from retained earnings. granted to certain key executives.An additional 6,000
Also as of the beginning of fiscal year 1971, the shares were available for granting of future options
Company and its domestic subsidiaries changed their under the 1969 stock option plan.Options are granted
method of computing depreciation on all plant and at prices not less than 100% of fair market value at
' equipment from accelerated methods to the straight- dates of grant and are exercisable within five years
line method for financial reporting purposes. This from dates of grant.Shares under option have option
change reduced depreciation for the year ended prices ranging from$10.88 to $23.50 per share, an
October 29,1971 by approximately$123,000 and had average of$16.02 per share.Changes during the two
the effect of increasing net income for that year by years ended October 27,1972 in shares under option
approximately$58,000($.08 per common share) as are aummarized as follows:
compared to the preceding year. ea.seeersererM orswPrIearas.re
(4) LONO-TERN DEBT.Various restrictions are im- Ohms , �'
Balance October 90,t1920.226e0 14041
posed by the terms of the 7% 99 2 zwo sm i51,000
promissory noteagrere- <erarrted«bscrrr.
melt Including restrictions on payment of dividends, ex.rchable:
maintenance of working capital, additional borrow- 1971 9,500 1oe,oss 3,010 51.14e
Ina,purchase of treasury stock, merger or consoii- 1972 1,500 23,375 4,400 e4,276
datlon and sale of assets.Retained earnings free from ExncRe'
restrictions at October 27,1972 amounted to approx- 1171 _...• (1,300) (16,413) (1,300) (18.413)
lrrhatelyi1,785,000. 1972 _.... (3,000) (3eea0) (3A0N (Wool
Canned or expired:
(5) COMMON SHARES AND ADDITIONAL CAPITAL 1971 (230) (3,535) (260) (s,5ss)
IN EXCESS OF PAR VALUE. Changes In common 1972 ••••••• (2.0001 (45,000) (10200) (27,500)
Balance
shares and additional capital in excess of par value Oetobsr27,s9r2,27,000 1t/32,e79 as3r476
during the two years ended October 27, 1972 were During 1972 the shareholders approved the 1972
as follows: Employees'Stock Purchase Plan end 15,000 common
rawr shares were reserved for issuance under the plan.
Comm a"" Mad Ms
a...... Participating employees have been granted options
Mons e,e.a sans,. to purchase shares through payroll deductions. The
"him Octobar 30.1°7o•• 743.139 $278,6" 1,034,493 shares for which options are exercised will be issued
Mara Issued upon exercise at the conclusion of the plan on April 5, 1974 at a
d Oak options 1,300 488 15.925
Premeds from sale of a price which will be the lower of(a) 90% of the fair
by market value of the shares on the date of commence,
aloe option subsidiary — - 52.111 meet of the plan(S16.08)or(b)90% of the fair mar-
Bahama October 29,1971 744,439 27e,1e5 1,102,529 kst value of the shares on April 5,1974.
r Share lend M a public (I) PROFIT BHARIIO PLAN. The Company has a
° (less expenses trusteed profit sharing plan covering ail full time ern-
Recurred of 946,562) 15,000 7,125 2e9,143
ployees of the Company and a domestic subsidiary
, Shores Issued under the
tset Employees'stooic which provides for contributions equal to the greater
Peados Pun...._..., GAM 2� 101,247 of either 3%of participants'annual compensation or
an amount equal to 109E of that portion of pretax
awns Wm Wen.x income(as defined)which is 12% or lees of net
of Mott options 3,000 1,125 35.475
Proosede received by s sales,plus 20% of Chet portion of pretax income(as
defined)which exceeds 12% of net sides.Benefits
euMilley for extending
1Iae Wm of the stock allocated to employees' accounts are payable upon
*peon — - 2,e05 retirement,death or earlier termination. in a lump
asianos oesob.r 27,ten 7rV1eo OM 746 1,Sap,9a9 sum or in instalments. The contributions charged
17
against income were$279,115 and $149,675,respec- parries,aggregate approximately$2,122,000, ranging
tively,for the years ended October 27, 1972 and in annual amounts from approximately$175,000 In
October 29,1971. 1973 to approximately 821,000 in 1992.
Substantial portions of the Company's :sales for
(7) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES.The fiscal year 1972 are subject to statutory renegotiation.
Company and certain subsidiaries lease manufactur- In the opinion of management,refunds,If any,which
1mg and office buildings for which total rentals under may be determined would not have any material et-
non-cancelable leases,exclusive of reai estate taxes, fed on the Company's financial position,
insurance and other expense payable by the com-
ACCOUNTANTS'REPORT
The Board of Directors and Shareholders In our opinion,such financial statements present fairly
Rosemont Inc.: the financial widen of Rosemount Inc.and subsidiaries
at October2 17 972 and October 29,1971 and the results
We have examined the consolidated balanos sheet of of their operations and changes in their finencW
Rosemount Inc.and subsidiaries a of October 27,1972 for the reepsotive yam then ended, in con ketth
and October A,1971 and the related statements of in- generallyaccepted amounting principles up-
come and retained eamhpgss and c in financialinap plied during the
ttwpoaysere October 21,1972 adna-
position na was made in accoorrda nce thens 9anrilfy a ur swami- test
big In ing of fled y' 197 gata 1 in methodammos of accounting
auditing standards,and accordingly included such lints for research and development costs and oomputlnp da-
of the accounting records and such other auditing pro- predation as described in note a to tin oonsdlidated
osdurss as we considered necessary in the cirouastsnoss. Mandel statements.
PEAT,MARWICK,MITCHELL d CO.
Minneapolis.Minnesota
Dsosmba 30,1972
1st
DIRECTORS
T.R.ANDERSON VERNON H.HEATH
President, President
Perrybel/Enterprises,Inc.
RICHARD V.DeLEO RAYMOND J.HIGGINS
Woe President Prelate Investor
CLARENCE G.FRAME RICHARD E.HORNER
PresiFirst Planed Bank o1 St.Paul E��ns n 6 Company
JULE M.H ANNAFORD
Senior Penner.
daa� oPresident E
W t �and Halliday roe
OFFICERS
VERNON H.HEATH WILLIAM L.MURRAY
President Vim President
WILLARD L.MOLINE DONALD M.BULUVAN
Senior Vice President Woe President
RICHARD V.DeLEO ROBERT W.HANSON
Woe Prssldsnt Seeraary-Treawrer
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
First Trust Company of St.Paul
CORPORATE OFFICES
Post Office Box 35129
Minneapolis,Minnesota 55435
MAJOR SUBSIDIARIES
ROSEMOUNT A.O.
Bwltt rland,Barry Rigel,Managing Administrator
ROSEMOUNT ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED
England Harry Fullaper,Managing Director
ROSEMOUNT PARTITIONS,INC.
Mlnneapols,Robed E.Mlles.President
ROSEMOUNT ENGINEERING GmbH
Germany,Bernard IOmu,General Manager
ROSEMOUNT NASHVILLE,INC.
Nashville,Tenn.,Made H.Brogdsn.President
UNIFLO SYSTEMS COMPANY
Mlnneep*Vernon H.Heath.President
19
10 YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY—ROSEMOUNT INC.AND SUBSIDIARIES
1972 11171
Net Sales $1 9,012,099 15,324,321
Pre-Tax Income. 2,224,207 1.587,027 .1
Provision for Income Taxes 1,194,108 757,048
Income before Extraordinary Gain 1,030,099 829,979
Extraordinary Gain
Net Income 1,030,099 829,979
Per Share of Common Stock Income before Extraordinary Gain. 1.36 1.12 t
Extraordinary Gain
Net Income. ... 1.36 1.12
Company-sponsored Research and Development 847,451 942,2138
Dividends Paid Per Share ...
Total Shares Outatanding at Year End 772,660 744,439
Net Income as Percent ol Average Net Worth . .. ... 14.57 14.10
Net Worth .... .. 7,803,209 8,334.057
Current Assets 9,408,235 7.551,942
Current Liabilities 3,821,981 2,937,050
Current Ratio 2.46 2.57
Long-Term oebl. 1,500,000 1,825,000
Number of Employees 972 848
1810 tell Rt88 111111 1110 INS 1184 Hq
13,388,286 12)303,796 13,798,353 11,546,849 10,248,770 8,533,391 7,382,887 5,548,087
848,847 857,053 1,522,201 1,192,960 1,249,912 1,072,141 877,373 453,782
392,992 418,207 792,581 581,867 801,181 534,415 486,194 211,772
455,855 438,846 729,640 625,293 848,731 537,728 411,179 239,455
316,235
455,855 754,081 729,840 625,293 848,731 537,728 411,179 239,455
.61 .60 1.00 .87 .94 .82 .63 .37
.43
.81 1.03 1.00 .87 .94 .82 .63 337
1,137,390 984,173 765,651 895,103 472,075 370,835 448,678 451,533
.08 .12 .11 .10 .0875 .075 .05 .0375
743,139 139,289 731,642 125,442 718,762 850,280 853,880 649,980
8.75 18.32 18.66 19.12 27.41 35.11 37.45 30.43
5,435,554 4,988,898 4,252,219 3,589,510 2,971,875 1,781,840 1,301,686 894,337
8,441,688 5,785,189 5,995,458 4,299,366 3,682,000 2,851,820 2,556,194 1,967,880
2,453,981 1,988,290 2,308,043 2,289,548 1,883,461 1,459,512 1,216,153 878,397
2.82 2.91 2.80 1.88 1.94 1.95 2.10 2.21
1,150,000 1,875,000 2,234,424 18,750 673,600 856,250 600,000
803 796 818 799 712 585 493 451
NOTE 1-Total shares ontendkW hoe been NOTE 3 d Average
worth�t theth le hpYhe r
ithrratio
Whaled for NI stock spate, stowage
end of the year.
NOTE 2-Net boon»pp shin for fiscal years NOTE 4-Not Income and net worthamountster
forshares 111W18 le bred on swage outstanding
prior y�the
bred Nast outstanding shines at restated m dare for flecal year 11120 and effect the l prior yeses expensing of research and
end
yew end. deviopnwd Casts es rowed realer that 8a
emortisadon of thses owls ores a 0ll►y er pedal
u rrr prior*reported. til
UR&Systems Company
As Rosemount's fiscal year drew to a close,the com- system and a full-scale vehicle on a short guideway seg-
pany received word that Uniflo Systems Company (USC) ment.Under the contract extension,a full-scale,outdoor,
was to be granted a $300,000 extension to its$98,000 300-foot demonstration system will be built west of Rose-
research and development contract from the US.Depart- mount's Eden Prairie headquarters.
ment of Transportation. At this writing the contract was The partially enclosed,ground-level system will have
in the last stages of procurement. dual guideways at one end,a single guideway at the other,
Uniflo has developed a Personal Rapid Transit(PRT) a curved section,and a switch ahead of the two-guideway
system employing small, passive vehicles propelled on segment.
cushions of air supplied through a guideway. When completed in late 1973,the system will provide
One of the challenges in marketing the unique Uniflo new demonstration capability for Uniflo. This should
PRT system has been the newness of the technology,and a stimulate increased interest.
reluctance on the part of potential developers to be the Uniflo people continue to pursue several potential
first to try a technologically sound,yet practically un- transit and material handling contracts.
proven,system. The 1972 Uniflo investment($139,000 after tax cred-
The anticipated DOT contract,combined with the ini- its)continues to be substantial for a company of Rose-
tial award,represent a breakthrough for Uniflo.Until now, mount's size,but the market potential justifies the cost,as
Uniflo has been demonstrated on an oval,half-scale indoor well as the risk involved.
1t 1 1m 1p0 i0N ISMS IS117
anrriC
•
8%of 1972 Sales
37%Annual Sales Growth,1967-1972
Rosemount Partitions
Solid growth again was achieved by Rosemount Par- increased productivity during 1972.
titions. This subsidiary manufactures and markets RO- The product line was extended to include such items
TOPANELS, and an expanding line of complementary as desks, side panels, roll-under files, drawers, storage
"officescaping" elements. The sound-absorbing ROTC). units and organizer shelves—all functionally and aestheti-
PANELS are colorful space dividers.They can be al.- cally coordinated with the basic ROTOPANEL units.
ranged in a variety of configurations to form "office Rosemount can provide an integrated system for complete
stations"with other Rosemount Partitions products. work stations. They achieve better utilization of office
During fiscal 1972, Rosemount Partitions nearly dou- space and are attractive.
bled its sale and earnings.In March.the company doubled In six years of operation,the company has established
its floor space when it expanded into new production areas itself in a market served by some 42 other companies.
in its plant south of the Twin Cities.The number of em- Contracts during fiscal 1972 included initial"offrcescap-
plovees also doubled. log"efforts for national headquarters for finance compa-
New equipment and automated manufacturing meth- hies and insurance organizations, as well as several other
ods,added to the operation during fiscal 1971,resulted in national industrial companies.
22
' • ' ' . .
..„.
,..„
I 7 r"t PIP
. .
„.„..
..•
•
•
•
0
Y •
•
or
ei
1111
23
)‘t
� V i
•
This scene, at last year's Rosemount Children's Christmas
Party in Bognor Regis, England, was typical of many employee
activities. Rosemount people traditionally get together for both
company-sponsored and individually organized functions,such as
parties,picnics,sporting events,recreation,fishing trips,through-
out the year.
In 1956,the company's first year,there were less than a dozen
Rosemount employees,all in Minnesota. Last year, there were
more than 900 Rosemount families in six countries: the United
States,the United Kingdom,West Germany, Switzerland, France
and Denmark.
Rosemount to en Equal Opportunity AMAnnativrt Action Employer
r f
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 214
MILL CREEK - FIRST PHASE
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING
AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 135
The Council of the Village of Eden Prairie does ordain as follows:
Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended by adding to Section
26, Township 116, Range 22 as follows:
Approximately 12 acres lying southwesterly of County Road 1 and
northwesterly of the centerline of Purgatory Creek in that part of
the northeast quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 22, lying
west of lines described as follows: commencing at a point in the
north line of said section which is 998.25 feet west along said line
from the northeast corner of said section, which point is marked by
a judicial landmark; thence south parallel with the east line of
said section a distance of 1730 feet to a point which is marked by
a judicial landmark; thence west parallel to the north line of said
section 330.4 feet to a point which is marked by a mudiciel landmark;
thence south parallel to the east line of said Section 234.7 feet
to the center line of County Road 1, now known as County Road No. 59
(the point of intersection of said line with the northerly line
of said road being marked by a nudicial landmark) thence south 49
degrees 34 minutes east along the center line of said road 8.15 feet;
thence southeasterly along the center line of said road on a tang-
ential curve to the left with a radius of 741.66 feet a distance of
372 feet to a point 998.25 feet west, measured on a line parallel with
the north line of said section from the east line of Section 26; thence
south parallel to said east line 185.3 feet to the point of intersection
of said line with a northerly boundary line of lot 5. "Eden Prairie Acres"
which point is marked by a mudicial landmark and passing through the
point of intersection of said line with the south line of said road
which point is also marked by a judicial landmark; thence northwesterly
and then southwesterly along said northerly line and along the north-
westerly line of said Lot 5 to the intersection of the latter line with
the south line of the northeast quarter of said Section 26, except that
part thereof embraced within Registered Land Survey No. 1032.
RM 6.5
First read at a regular meeting of the Council of the Village of Eden
Prairie this 27th day of March and finally read, adopted and ordered published
at a reL lar meeting of the Council of said Village on the 10th day of April,
1973.
ATTEST: Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
SEAL
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk
I
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE —
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 205
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING
AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 135
EDENVALE 6TH ADDN.
The Council of the Village of Eden Prairie does ordain as follows:
Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended by adding to
Section 10, Township 116, Range 22 as follows:
Located on Outlot A, Edenva.le 2nd Addition, in the W 1/2 of the �^✓
NW 1/2 of the N 1/2 of Section 10, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin / 2
County. -J`/`1
RM 6.5
The first reading was held at a regular meeting of the Council of the
Village of Eden Prairie, this 13th day of February and finally read, adopted
and ordered published at a regular meeting of the Council of said Village
on the day of , 1973.
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
Edna M. Holsgren, Clerk
/ 1
• it
DATE: April6, 1973
TO: Mayor and Members of Village Council
FROM: John Frane, Finance Director tif 'l
SUBJECT: WATER AND SEWER BILLING r—
Attached is a draft copy of our Water and Sewer bill. We will
begin billing in about three weeks. As per Ordinance No. 165, we
will be using monthly minimum of $2.50 for sewer and $3.50 for
water. The bill provides a space for the customer to insert the
current water reading. We anticipate a considerable saving in meter
reading costs if our residents will provide this information.
JF:kg
•s
•
•
' -2. OUR WATER METER READING IS LAST READING _ ___ _0
! P
. , 0 0 PREVIOUS READING ____0
'+,ocle }' Date 197_ GALLONS USED ____ _0
imir
,4R ?' ► ��i PLEASE FILL IN YOUR $
+:CAGE OFFICES I 8950 EOM PRAIRIE ROAD ' PRESENT WATER METER WATER _
READING AND RETURN ONE
t EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55343 COPY OF THIS STATEMENT SEWER _
UTILITY SERVICE STATEMENT R M A
SALES TAX on water
RATES
—_- Per 100 Mont previous Balance
Gallons I Min $
Water .05 $3.5 Account Balance
(Sewer .05 2.50,
Service for the quarter ending 19
1.00 will be added to accounts unpaid as of 19
•
w -
ORDINANCE NO. 165
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING WATER AND SEWER
UTILITY RATES, RULES & REGULATIONS
•
The Council of the Village of Eden Prairie does ordain as follows:
kj Section 1. Definitions.
Subdivision 1. "Residential Equivalent Connection (R.E.C.)" shall
mean each dwelling unit as defined in Ordinance
No. 135.
Subdivision 2. "Village" shall mean the Village Council, Village
Manager or their agents.
Subdivision 3. "System Access Charge" shall mean the fee charged
by the Village when a connection is first made to
the Village sewer or water system.
Section 2. Meters.
Subdivision 1. Meters Required
A. Every connection to the water system shall be metered by meters
purchased from the Village or approved for use by the Village.
he owner of
B. Villages may reire
tall a meterifor the purpose of determining Village
The determining sewages connected to e
flow.
C. Any meter when installed shall become a part of the real property
therein. ll have
the
r at
times and The Village the immediate aarea of the access
mete� shall bekept free reasonable
of
debris or other obstructions so a o to f reading,employeespair f the
Village easy access for purposed
Subdivision 2. Removal of Meter.
No person shall remove a meter or any part thereof nor tamper with
or by-pass any meter without authorization from the Village.
Subdivision 3. Damage to Meters.
• Damage to meters, not due to normal use shall be repaired by the
Village or its authorized representative. Cost of such repairs will
be billed in the same manner as water and sewer charges.
•
Section 3. Rates. The following rates and charges are hereby established:
Subdivision 1. System Access Charges.
A. For Sanitary Sewer $135 per R.E.C.
B. For Waterworks $100 per R.E.C.
C. The minimum system access charges for industrial, public and
office uses are 2 times the R.E.C. charge per acre of site —
needed to accommodate the building and 3 times the R.E.C.
charge per Acre of (site area) needed to accommodate the
building for commercial users. The needed site area equals
the building area in acres divided by 0.3. The needed site
area shall be subject to a minimum of 1 (one) Acre.
Subdivision 2. User Charges for:
Sanitary Sewer .05 per hundred gallons
subject to a minimum of $2.50 per R.E.C. per month
For Water .05 per hundred gallons
subject to a temporary minimum of $3.50 per R.E.C. per month
po ry
The minimum monthly user charge for commercial, industrial, public
and office use shall be $2 .50 per month for sewer and $4.50 per month
for water.
Subdivision 3. Sanitary Sewer Service Rates for Single - Family
Detatched Residential Customers.
Sewer charges per R. E.C. shall be determined by using the amount of
water consumed in the billing periods ending In January, February or
March of each year, divided by the number of months in the billing
period subject to the monthly minimum. Whenever such average water
used during the billing period ending in January, February or March
may be disproportionate to the actual sewage use for the forthcoming
year, the Village shall establish an average water charge and corres-
ponding sanitary sewer charge by the use of suitable methods which
will be as nearly fair as possible, such determination by the Village
to be final.
Section 4. Billing and Payment.
Subdivision 1. Due Dates.
All water and sewer service bills shall be due and payable not less
than 20 days after the date of mailing to the customer. The sum of
$1.00 shall be added to any water and sewer bill not paid by the
due date. Interest at the rate of 6% per year shall be added when
an account is 60 days past due.
•
• Subdivision 2.
Violation of Subdivision 1 of this Section or Subdivision 2
of Section 2 of this Ordinance shall be a misdemeanor
punishable by a sentence of imprisonment of not more than
90 days or to payment of a fine of not more than $300.00
Section 6. Validity. • "'—
The Village Council of the Village of Eden Prairie hereby declares
that should any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this
Ordinance be declared for any reason to be invalid, it is the
intent of the Village Council of the Village of Eden Prairie that
it would have passed all other portions of this Ordinance inde-
pendent of the elimination herefrom of any such portion as may
be declared invalid.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Council of the Village
of Eden Prairie this 14th day of March, 1972, and finally read
and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the
Council of said Village on the 28th day of March 1972.
did
Paul R. Redpath, Ma or
Attest:
Edna M. Holmgren, Vlerk SEAL
•
• VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor and Village Council
FRC,1: Carl J. Jullie, Village Engineer
THROUGH: Robert P. Heinrich, Village Manager
CATF.: 6 April 1973
SUBJECT: CREEKWOOD ESTATES Report on final plat
1st ADDITION
Plat is located north of County Road 1 and east
of Creek Knoll Road. See attached location map.
HISTORY: Village Council amended zoning from Rural to District
R1 13.5 on 13 February 1973. (1st Reading)
Planning and Zoning Commission approved prel iminary
plat on 13 February 1973. 1
The owner, Hustad Development Corporation has requested
Village Council approval of the final plat of Creekwood
Estates 1st Addition on 10 April 1973.
CONFORMANCE WITH APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT:
The final plat of Creekwood Estates 1st Addition conforms
with the approved preliminary plat except as follows:
1. The alignment of Creekwood Drive has been
shifted northward slightly to avoid removing
several large Oak trees.
2. A large outlot (B) is proposed for a substantial
portion of the northeast area of the plat. This
is advisable to help insure proper planning for
sanitary sewer for the areas at lower elevations
near the flood plain of Purgatory Creek.
VARIANCES REQUIRED:
Variances from the minimum lot area requirement of 13,500
sq. ft. will he necessary for lots 4 and 5 in Block 1,
These lot areas are 11,290 sq. ft. and 10,544 sq. ft.
respectively. Since the area to be dedicated as park is
adjacent to these lots, the variance requests are reasonable
and should be granted.
D
r
Engineering Report on Final Plat
Page 2
BONDIt1G:
Per Village Ordinance No. 93,the owner will be
required to submit a performance bond prior to
release of hardshells and the enabling resolution.
The bond amount shall cover all off-site utility
and street construction required for this plat,
computed as follows:
Improvement
1. Sanitary Sewer Laterals $34,580
2. Watermain Laterals 29,400
3. Storm Sewer Lines 4,230
4. Street construction, including 61,300
grading, concrete curb and gutter,
retaining walls and boulevard sodding.
129,510
5. Plus 20% 25,890
Total amount to be bonded $155,400
PARK DEDICATION:
Park dedication within this plat consists of a long
strip or "parkway"at the northwest corner of the
plat adjacent to Purgatory Creek. This dedication
is acceptable per Mr. Jessen, Park and Recreation
Director. No public pathways are shown within this
plat, however the developer indicates that pathways
to the park site will be provided when the 2nd Addition
(Outlot B) is platted.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of CREEKWOOD ESTATES 1ST ADDITION
final plat subject to the following:
A. Execution of the Developer's Agreement to be
prepared by the Village Engineer.
B. Receipt of a performance bond from the developer
in the amount of $155,400.
_.... ..... ..
r
Engineering Report on Final Plat
Page 3
C, Make revisions to the final pl at dated
April 6, 1973 as follows:
(1) Show 10' utility and drainage
easements centered on all lot
1 i nes except those abutting
street R/W or park property.
(2) The land to be dedicated as
park should be described as
"Outlot C" rather than "Park".
(3) A cul-de-sac (50 foot radius)
should be shown within Outlot B
at the terminus of Creekwood Drive.
Respectfull !omitted.
c -AA ?
Carl J. Jull e, P. E.
Village Engineer
.. � l
. am `
_ I
../17 . .
- 1 .
J
O
a
•
•
•
1ff
h
z
•
to
- ,I .4# b
.,.tj
.�► ti N
z; I
y
Inji
_ 1
J
•
�1
-- --- Il
Ma 1 1
'e9 . 1Stl !/ H \�
C:
2
n
. ,
I
i
lj _ -�j _ , j ^ i
r 1
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
1DNRdEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO, 685
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL
PLAT OF CREERNOOD ESTATES 1ST
ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of Creekwood Estates, 1st Addition has been
submitted in the manner required for platting of land under the Eden
Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes
and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the Village
plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of
Minnesota and ordinances of the Village of Eden Prairie
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat Approval Request for Creekwood Estates, 1st Addition
is approved upon compliance with following requirements:
1. Execution of the Developer's Agreement to be prepared
by the Village Engineer.
2. Receipt of a performance bond from the developer in
the amount of $155,400.00.
3. Conformance with the requirements of the Engineering
Report dated April 6, 1973.
B. Variance is herein granted from Village Ordinance No. 135
allowing lots 4 and 5, Block 1 to be less in net area from
the required 13,500 square feet minimum for District RI 13.5
zoning.
C. That the Village Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified
cony of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Deeds
and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MBA
462.358, Subd. 3.
D. That the Village Clerk is hereby directed to supply a cert-
ified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers
of the above named plat.
E. That the Mayor and Village Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the Village
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
•
solution l:o. 685
Creekwood Estates, 1st Addition
Page Two
ADOPTED by the Council of the Village of Eden Prairie on the
10th day of April, 1973.
• Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk
II
•
CLERK'S LICENSE LIST
APRIL 10, 1973
SMALL KENNEL
Howard Kaerwer, 12800 Gerard Drive (o.k.'d by Jack Hacking)
UTILITY SERVICE INSTALLER
Lon B. Anderson
PLUMING
Avoles Plumbing Service, Inc. - A. Walter Avoles
CONTRACTOR - MULTI-FAMILY&COMRCIAL
Mark Z. Jones Associates, Inc. - Scott A. Godin
GRAVEL MINING LICENSES (o.k.id by Gene Schuman)
Bury-Carlson, Inc.
Carl& Thomas Swendseen
flerliev Helle
Midwest Asphalt Corp.
Astleford, Carter, Hagen &Mason
I
EA J
w
r
TO: Village Council
FROM: John D. Frarie, Finance Director
DATE: April 10, 1973
L.. RE: Vouchers to be presented for approval at the April 10th
Council meeting.
#1727 Dictation Systems, $1,588.88. 7 dictation whines and 2
transcribers.
#1742 Gunnar I. Johnson $75,436.40. Estimate No. 6 on our Water
Treatment Plant. The plant is now 21% complete.
#1763 Orfei &Sons, $176.79. Work done in conjunction with gaining
an easement.
l
I
I
i /
•
.0
I' '
April 10, 1973
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN 1
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
I
I
_ The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows:
Year - 1973
Date Voucher# Name Item Amount
3/27 1707 Cancelled Not Replaced (5.70)
3/26 1709 Edward E. Woody, James Boyce Staring Lake Property Purchase
120,000.00
1710 Federal Reserve Bank 3/26 Payroll Taxes 1,?89.90
1711 Void Replaced by 1711
3/28 1712 Paul B. Kelley, Harold D. Brown Easement Acquisition
Nine Mile lA Sewer Ext. 3,356.00
- 3/29 1713 Robert P. Heinrich March Expenses 113.75
1714 M. B. Hagen Earnest Money-Pavelka Prop. 500.E
3/30 1715 Minn. Dept. of Public Safety License Plates-Pick-ups 6.50 i
4/4 1716 PERA March PERA 3,197.38
4/10 1717 American Public Works Assoc. Membership-Jullie &
Heinrich 30.00
1718 Astleford Equipment Co. Equipment Repairs 18.24
1719 Badger Meter, Inc. Meter 40.l0
1720 Blue Cross of Minnesota Employee Insurance 1,197.36
1721 Roger Boerger Fee for March 56.41
1722 Bruce Bren Antenna for Fire Radio 4.11
1723 Richard J. Brea Village Hall Maintenance 175.00
1724 Business Furniture, Inc. Office Furniture 117.64
1725 Commissioner of Administration 1st Quarter Social Security 6,045.33
1726 Commissioner of Taxation March Payroll Taxes 1,691.30
1727 Dictation Systems, Inc. Transcription Equipment
for Office 1,588.88
1728 Void Replaced by 1729
1729 Dorholt Printing & Stationery Supplies for Office, Public
Safety, Engineering & Rec. 317.27
1730 Eden Prairie Sanitation Trash Pick-Up-Village Hall 8.00
1731 Paul. Foss Printing Envelopes printed & "Cooler"
Mailer 449.75
1732 John D. Frane March Expenses 19.93
1733 Frontier Lumber & lidwe. Supplies - Village Hall
Improvement 295.00
1734 John K.Hacking Public Safety Dept. Supplies
Dec., Jan., Feb. Mileage 276.73
1735 Hennepin County Central Serv. Division Sheets - Assessing 30.00
1736 Hennepin County Dept. of Pub.
Works Supplies for Public Safety 49.67
1737 Hennepin County Finance Dept. Special Assessment Charges 90.35
1738 Roger Hennessy Agency Insurance for Public Safety
Cars 342.00
1739 Edna M. Holmgren March Mileage 10.59
-` 1740 Lynda Jaszczek Girls Rec. Club Leader 28.50
1741 Harold M. Jessen March Expenses 105.00
1742 Gunnar I. Johnson Water Treatment Plant #6 75,436.40
•
Claims for Payment
April 10, 1973
'- Page Two
Date Voucher# Name Item Amount
4/10 1743 Carl Jullie March Expenses 118.50
1744 Kris Komschlies Girls Rec. Club Leader 13.50
1745 Kraemer's Supplies for Fire Dept.,
Roads, Office 54.32
1746 Leef Bros., Inc. Towel &Rug Service 21.35
1747 Marshall & Swift Publication Publications for Assessor 57.50
1748 John McCulloch Fee for March 56.40
1749 Methodist Hospital Blood Alcohol Test 5.00 {
1750 Joan Meyers Fee for March 56.40
1751 Midwest Asphalt Road Material 741.50
1752 City of Minneapolis Urban Corp-Student Employment 75.00
1753 Minneapolis Gas Co. Fire Hall 431.10
1754 Minneapolis Typewriter, lnc. Rental 35.00
1755 Minnesota Fire, Inc. Extinguishers for V. Hall 52.00
1756 Minnesota Law Review Found. Publication for Manager 3.50 1
1757 Minnesota City Managers Assoc. Membership 15.00.
1758 Void Replaced by 1759 1
1759 Modern Tire Co. Tires &Repairs -Equipment 232.79
1760 C. H. Moser Consulting - Homart Ind.
Supplies for Build- Inspec. 406.16
1761 North American Life Ins. Employee Insurance 149.74
1762 Northern States Power Electric 68.87
1763 Orfei & Sons, Inc. No. Lund Road, Hoop Up Service
Connection 176.79
1764 W. G. Pearson, Inc. Road Material 59.17
1765 Wolfgang Penzel Fee for March 56.40
1766 Edna M. Holmgren Petty Cash for March 14.53
1767 Gary Pletsch Boys Rec. Club Leader 10.00
1768 Richard Putnam March Expenses 101.00
1769 Paul R. Redpath Fee for March 75.20
1770 Soil Engineering Services Soil Borings, Water Improvements
T.H.169& T.H.5 to Valley View 706.88
1771 Sub. Hennepin County Relief 30.00
1772 Supplee's 7 Hi Enterprises Fi11-1 Developing -Fire Dept. 18.00
1773 United Mailing Newsletter Mailing 30.96
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ..... ........ . 221,453.95
r
•
VILLAGE OF MEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL REPORT
MARCH, 31,1973
Cash Balances:
General and Special Revenue Funds $ 327,849
Capital Projects (Improvements) 56,461
Park Acquisition and Development (62,816)
Debt Service Funds 985,825
Utility Funds 64,065
As of 3/31/73 $1,371,381
Disposition of Cash:
Certificates of Deposit $1,030,000
Cash in Bank (per book) 167,301
Government Securities 174,083
$1,371,3814
Expenditures presented for approval at the Council Meeting
of April 10, 1973 total$221,453.95. These expenditures
will be met by the following sources of funds:
Cash in Bank $ 167,301
Certificate of Deposit Due 4/12/73 (Part) 54,153
$ 221,4514
JDF
4/6/73
r
,
MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL
Tuesday, March 27, 1973 7:30 P.M., Village Hall
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Paul Redpath, Councilmen John McCulloch,
Wolfgang Penzel and Roger Boerger and Councilwoman,
Joan Meyers.
COUNCIL STAFF: Village
S�nsgand Clerk, Edna M. Ho Robert P. lmgren.�e Attorney
I. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING HELD MARCH 13, 1973
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to approve the minutes of March 13th
with the following correction:
Reports of Officers, Boards & Commissions: (A), Page 4. Mr. Redpath
reported that in the near future the Hennepin County League might
be disbanded and efforts, etc.
With this correction Mr. Boerger seconded. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
II. PRESENTATION OF CONTRIBUTION FROM EDEN PRAIRIE JAYCEES. Door Decals and
Uniform Patches for Public Safety Department. to the Public Safety Dir.
Mr.6eF.akO vittLe,164 Jaycees President presented a check/in the amount of
$300 to be used f itx door decals and uniform patches. Pictures
were taken. The Mayor thanked Mr. oEIENbe�y on behalf of the Council
---foi•—thelirinterest in the Public Safety Depar.Sent. �.0
III. }}4 LIC S:
A. Public Hearing on Housing Task Force Report. Presented by Mrs.Sonia
Anderson.
Mrs. Anderson presented the Housing Task Force Report and a proposal to
hold a meeting with residents in Eden Prairie at the Prairie View School
or some other location in one of the schools. She suggested that a mailing
be seat to all residents, locations set for them to pick up copies of the
Housing Task Force Report, possibly through the schools. She noted that
perhaps slides and group discussions could be used at the meeting.
Mrs. Meyers suggested that members of the Housing Task Force reactivate
public development because of the Federal subsidy stoppage. The Mayor
stated that he would like to see adoption of a Housing Policy for Eden
Prairie. Mr. McCulloch commented that he was not satisfied with the
report, he felt that there was too much of it devoted to subsidized
housing. The Manager suggested May 3rd as a possible date4 for the
meeting end advised the Task Force to eipabse o R.lr service clubs, etc in
� t
the caemnunity as well as residents.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to set May 3rd as a meeting date at
either the Eden Prairie High School cefetorium or the Prairie View
School. The staff was instructed to publicize through service clubs.
Mr. Buerger seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
T
Council Meeting
March 27, 1973
Page Two
B. Mill Creek. Hustad Development Corporation. PUD Concept Plan.
Resolution No. 668. First Reading, Ordinance No. 214. Reclassification
from District Rural to RN 6.5. Preliminary Plat Approval, First Phase,
Resolution No. 669.
Village Planner, Dick Putnam and Bill Bonner, Hustad Development Company
reviewed and presented the Mill Creek proposal. The project is located
in southeastern Eden Prairie in the area identified as the Bluffs West
Sector. Mr. Bonner reviewed the concept plan for the 32 acre site
southeasterly of Homeward Hills Road and County Road#1. Preliminary
plans for a small commercial area at the intersection of these two roads
are not included in the plan at this time. 65 townhouse units are pro-
posed with 16 units in the first phase.
Mrs. Meyers asked when the engineering problem in regard to curb and
gutters would be resolved, Mr. Putnam replied that it would be before
the final plat is approved.
Mr. McCulloch commended Village Engineer, Carl Jullie for his reports
submitted to the Council on this project.
1. A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to close the hearing and adopt Resol-
ution 7o. 668 approving the PUD Concept Plan for Mill Creek with Planning
and Zoning recommendations 4 through 4 usiggilaga of March 6, 1973.
Penzel seconded. All voted eye. Motion carried.
2. A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to adopt the first reading of Ordinance
No. 214 approving reclassification from District Rural to RM 6.5 for
12 acre parcel of land with Planning Commission recomend.ations 4 through
4 and satisfactory settlement of engineering problems with Village Engineer.
Mr. Boerger seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
3. A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to adopt Resolution No. 669, preliminary
plat approval, Mill Creek, 1st Phase Cluster, 13 units. Mr. Penzel
seconded. All voted eye. Motion carried.
C. Eden Land Commotion. Zachman Homes, Edenvale 7th Addition.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to set April 10, 1973 at 7:30 p.m.,
as a hearing date for Zachman Homes, Edenvale 7th Addition. Mr.
Boerger seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
IV. RESOLUTIONS & ORDINANCES
A. Second Reading, Ordinance No. 211. Creating&Establishing Fire
Zones.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to adopt the second reading of Ordinance
No. 211 and order published. Mrs. Meyers seconded. All voted eye. Motion
carried.
Council Meeting
March 27, 1973
Page Three
B. Second Reading, Ordinance No. 212. Amending Ordinance No. 43.
Wells.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to adopt the second reading of Ordinance
No. 212 and order published. Mrs. Meyers seconded. All voted aye.
Notion carried.
C. Second Reading, Ordinance No. 202. Licensing and Regulating the
Use and Sale of Intoxicating Liquor.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to adopt the second reading of Ordinance
No. 202 and order published with the following addition:
Page 9, Subd. 7. At the time of each original application for a
license or application for a change in ownership or control
of corporation, except in the case of, etc.
With this addition, Mr. McCulloch seconded. All voted eye unanimously.
Motion carried.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to establish the policy that no action
will be taken on licenses to be issued until 120 days after publication
of Ordinance No. 202. Mrs. Meyers seconded. All voted we. Motion
carried.
D. Resolution No. 667. Requesting Minnesota State Legislature to
Adopt Legislation Authorizing Reimbursement to Municipalities
of Costs Incurred in Relocating Utilities on All State Trunk
Highways.
A motion was made by Mr. McCulloch to adopt Resolution No. 667. Mrs.
Meyers seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
E. Resolution No. 670. Requesting the State of Minnesota and Hennepin
County to Reduce the Speed Limit on County Road Pt to 40 Miles per
Hour and Providing a Blinking Warning Light at the Intersection of
County Road#4 and Valley View Road.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to adopt Resolution No. 670. Mr.
McCulloch seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
F, Resolution No. 671. Informing Homart Development Company of the
Village of Eden Prairie's Intention to Provide Utilities and Roads
to the Proposed Regional Shopping Center.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to adopt Resolution No. 671. Mrs. Meyers
seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
Increasing
G. Resolution No. 672. LNIENENTMX0a the Compensation of the Village_dex-Mvid.
$75 per Month Based Upon Review of his Performance After a Period
of Six Months According to the Original Hiring Agreement.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to adopt Resolution No. 672. Mr. Boerger
seconded.
/ndill voted aye. Motion carried.
�f
Council Meeting
March 27, 1973
Page Four
H. Resolution No. 673. Authorizing Mayor and Village Manager to Enter
into an Agreement to Acquire Approximately 7—,—, Acres of Land Adjacent
to and West of Prairie View School for Park Purposes in en Amount
not to Exceed $22,500.
A motion was made by Mr. McCulloch to adopt Resolution No. 673. Mr.
Penzel seconded. On roll call, all voted aye. Motion carried.
V. PETITIONS, REQUESTS&COMMUNICATIONS
A. D. H. Gustafson&Associates, Inc. Requesting Storm Sewer Extension
to St. John's Wood.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to receive the letter dated March 15,
1973 requesting storm sewer extension for St. John's Wood and order
feasibility study. Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted eye. Motion carried.
B. Petition Received from Residents of Barberry Lane, Padon Drive, and
Peterborg Drive Requesting Feasibility Study and a Public Hearing
for the Purpose of Deter:Id:x(1r the Cost of Paving Their Street.
A motion was made by Mrs_ Meyers tdfreceive the petition from residents
on Padon Drive, Barberry Lane, and Peterborg Drive, order a feasibility
report and set April 24, 1973 as a hearing date for the street paving
project. Mr. Penzel seconded. Motion carried.
C. Letter Dated March 15, 1973 from Minnesota Highway Department in
Reference to State Highway Department's Participation on the
Ring Route and Improvements to T.H. 169, 212, 494.
Discussion was held in regard to this problem, the Village Manager
stated that he had gone about as far as he could administratively, the
Mayor suggested that the Village draft a bill to present to the legislature
so Eden Prairie can get help. He offered to set up a meeting in the
Governor's office with tint Council approval. The Village Manager stated
that he was meeting with the Highway Department soon. No action was taken.
VI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS& COMMISSIONS
A. Report of Public Safety Director & Fire Chief. Annual Report of
Eden Prairie Volunteer Fire Department.
Public Safety Director, Jack Hacking reviewed his first report on the
Fire Department. He commended Asst. Chief, Gene Jacobson for conducting
training sessions in the community, reviewed projects the department
would like to consider in the future and thanked both Chief, Ray Mitchell
and Asst. Chief Gene Jacobson for their past year's service. Ray Mitchell
then read the annual report of the Department and asked the Council to
make sure when plans are reviewed in multiple units that adequate streets,
exits and entrences are provided for the fire equipment. Mayor Redpath
thanked him on behalf of the Council for the excellent service provided
by the Eden Prairie Fire Department.
V
Council Meeting
March 27, 1973
Page Five
B. Report of Finance Director. Progress of IOGIS.
John Frane, Finance Director reviewed the background of LOGIS,
Local Government Information System, the progress to date and
what to expect next. He stated that one of the LOGIS municipalites
will begin using the system for payroll about the middle of this
year on a pilot basis. The Village of Eden Prairie will then begin
training personnel in the use of the system. He then stated that
after bids are received, evaluated and contracts for computers and
systems are awarded and installed, each municipality will be in a
position to automate payroll, utility billing and general ledger
procedures as rapidly as it is able.
C. Reports of Village Attorney.
1. Proposed Metropolitan Rate Authority to Regulate N.S.P.
Electric Service in the Metropolitan Area.
Village Attorney, Keith Simons reviewed the Concept Plan in the
7 metro areas to regulate N.S.P. electric service rates similar
to Minneapolis Gas Co. Village Manager, Mr. Heinrich recommended
this plan.
A motion was made by Mr. Fenzel to approve the Manager's recommendation
to accept the concept plan, N.S.P. electric service rates. Mr. Redpath
seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
2. Trunk Sewer Assessment Appeal to the District Court by Mr. Karl
H. Krahl.
Village Attorney, Keith Simons reviewed the Notice of Appeal - Special
Assessments by Mr. Karl H. Krahl. No action was needed.
3. Crestwood Terrace. Alex Dorenkemper's Request for Final Plat
�.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to direct the Village Attorney to inform
Mr. Dorenkemper to re-submit the preliminary plat of Maplewood Park
Estates to the Planing Commission for review and recommendation. Mr.
Penzel. Messrs Penzel, Boerger, McCulloch and Redpath voted aye. Mrs.
Meyers voted no. Motion carried.
D. Reports of Village Engineer.
1. Final Plat Approval for Valley Knolls Addition. Resolution No.
67k.
A motion was made by Mr. Fenzel to adopt Resolution No. 674 approval
the final plat of Valley Knolls Addition. Mr. Boerger seconded. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
I
•
Council Minutes
March 27, 1973
Page Six
2. Final Plat Approval. High Point 2nd Addition. Resolution
No. 675.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to adopt Resolution No. 675 approving
the final plat of High Point 2nd Addition. Mr. Penzel seconded. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
3. Approval of Plans and Specifications. Extension of Trunk and
Lateral Watermains for Rosemount Engineering. Resolution No. 676.
Projects WTR 72-8-23 and 72-8-24.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to adopt Resolution No. 676 approving
plans and specs for projects WTR 72-8-23 and 72-8-24. Mrs. Meyers
seconded. All voted eye. Motion carried.
Village Manager, Mr. Heinrich reported to the Council that Rosemount, Inc.
had requested Municipal Bonds information.
4. Revised Traffic Signal Maintenance Agreement with Minnesota
Highway Department for Signals at T.H.#5 and Co. Rd.#4.
. v Resolution No. 677.
W'°1'Y A so on was made by Mr. Boerger to adopt Resolution No. 677 amending
Cooperative Agreement No. 56449 to provide for reimbursable maintenance
on signals at T.H.#5 and Co. Rd. Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted
eye. Motion carried.
5. Approval of Plans and Specifications for Insorovemerats in the
Red Rock Planning Sector. Resolution No. 678.
1. Construction of trunk watermain in Scenic Heights Road from
Mitchell Road west to Hiawatha Ave. Project 72-8-21.
2. Construction of Atherton Road including necessary water and
storm sewer lines from Mitchell Road easterly to proposed
East/West Parkway. Project 72-9-17.
3. Regrading, paving, construction of curb and gutter and storm
sewer in the existing Mitchell Road right-of-way from inter-
section of Scenic Heights Road and Mitchell Road south to
the south line of Section 15. Project 72-3-20.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to adopt Resolution No. (i78 approving
plans and specifications, combing projects for bidding and ordering
advertisement for bids on Narielextftpagn April 19th at ll o'clock a.m.
with Council consideration on April 24th at 7:30 o'clock p.m. Mr. Fenzel
seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
6. Authorization for Mayor and Village Manager to Enter into an
Agreement with Brown & Kelly for Easement Acquisition under
Project 72-1-12 jNine Mile 1A) Sanitary Sewer fficteasio.
Resolution No. 679.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to ndda adopt Resolution No.
679 authorizing the Mayor and Village Manager to sign an agreement
with Brown end Kelly and instruct the Manager end Village Attorney
to clarify Item 8. Mrs. Meyers seconded. All voted aye. Notice
carried.
Council Meeting
March 27, 1973
Page Seven
E. Reports of Director of Parks and Recreation. Purgatory
Creek Open Space Planning Study.
The Park &Recreation Director reviewed the Purgatory Creek Open
Space Planning Study. The Manager stated that there was a lack
of contour mapping in the Village, that most of what we have has
been done by the developers when plats have been submitted.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to accept the proposal of Brauer
and Associates to perform Open Space Planning for Purgatory Creek in
the amount not to exceed $12,500 to be qual]y shared with Riley-
Purgatory Creek Watershed District and authorize necessary two foot
contour base mapping of the study area in the amount not to exceed
$ll,5O0.Mrs. Meyers seconded. On roll call, all voted aye. Motion
carried.
F. Reports of Village Manager.
1. Authorization to Hire a Landscape Architect in the Area of
Planning and Park Development at Salary in Range of$750-900
per Month.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to authorize the Manager to hire a
Landscape Architect at a salary range of $750-900 per month. Mr. Penzel
seconded. On roll call, all voted aye. Motion carried.
2. Master Labor Agreement and Supplemental Labor Agreement. Between
Village of Eden Prairie and International Union of Operating,
Engineers, local No. 49.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers approve the Labor Agreement and Supple-
mental Labor Agreement with International Union of Operating Engineers,
Local No. 49. Mr. McCulloch seconded. All voted eye. Motion carried.
3. Letter of Commendation Received frail the Eden Prairie School
for Public Safety Officer Keith Wall.
The Manager reviewed a letter received from the Eden Prairie Schools
dated March 15, 1973 commending Keith Wall for services provided the
school. He recommended placing it on file.
4. Discussion of 18-169 Minnesota River Toll Bridge Authority
Proposed legislation.
The Manager urged the Council to attend this meeting on March 29th.
The Manager reimmat informed the Council that he would be going on
vacation for three weeks,/returning on April 24th.
5, ed tQ- enda)Notice\``to Gov Bodies of a sui
dai th$'F th #dicial SUs ct,' of‘ i , tatee f
ta vvv
•
Council Meeting
March 27, 1973
Page Eight
5. (Added to Agenda) Notice to Municipalities end Townships
District Court, Fourth Judicial District, Court File No. 690532.
The Manager reviewed a notice to municipalities and townships of a lawsuit .—
pending in the Fourth Judicial District, County of Hennepin, State of'
Minnesota, entitled "The City of Brooklyn Center, et al, vs. The Metro-
politan Council, et al." On October 12, 1972, the Metropolitan Council
adopted a resolution, which resolution approved a method of allocating
to senicipalities the current costs of reserved capacity in the metro—
politen disposal system. The aforementioned lawsuit is seeking to have
that resolution delcared invalid and void for numerous reasons.
JJ 1G1. .i 1 .
No action was Weeded.
G. Village Clerk Report. Recommended License Application List Dated
March 27, 1973.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to approve the Clerk's recommended license
application list dated March 27th. Mr. Boerger seconded. All voted eye.
Motion carried.
VII. FINANCES
A. Payment of Claims No. 1642 through 1708.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to approve payment of claims no. 1642
through 1708. fir. Penzel seconded. On roll call, all voted eye. Motion
carried.
Meeting adjourned at 11:30 P.M.
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk