HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 03/13/1973 EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL
/" Tuesday, March 13, 1973 7:30 p.m. Village Hall
INVOCATION - - - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - -- ROLL CALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Paul Redpath, Joan Meyers, John McCulloch,
Wolf Penzel, Roger Boerger
COUNCIL STAFF: Village Manager Robert P. Heinrich;Village
Attorney Harlan Perbix;Clerk Edna Hoimgren
AGENDA
I. MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 21, 1973. and
REGULAR MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 27, 1973.
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Trunk Watermain in Scenic Heights Road from Mitchell Road west to
Hiawatha Avenue. Project No. 72-8-21, (Report from Brauer &
Assoc. dated 2/13/73 attached).
Action: Motion closing hearing and approving Resolution No. 662,
approving Improvement Project No. 72-8-21 and ordering prepa-
ration of plans and specifications,or deny.
B. Construction of Atherton Road, including Lateral Water and Storm
Sewer from Mitchell Road easterly to the proposed East/West Parkway.
Project No. 72-9-17. 'vi�j
Action: Motion closing hearing and approving Resolution No. 663,
approving Improvement Project No.72-9-17 and ordering prepa-
ration of plans and specifications,or deny. 1 j)
C. Mitchell Road Regrading, Paving,Curb and Gutter and Storm Sewer
from Scenic Heights Road south to the South line of Section. 15.
Project No. 72-3-20.
Action: Motion closing hearing and approving Resolution No. 664,
approving Improvement Project No. 72-3-20 end ordering prepa-
ration of plans and specifications,or deny. Apr p
D. Public Hearing on Proposed Liquor License Ordinance -Ordinance
No. 202.
Action: No action will occur at this meeting. The Second Reading of
Ordinance No. 202 is tentatively set for March 27, 1973.
K
• Council Agenda
March 13, 1973
Page 2
III. 9RDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS:
JA. $econd Reading - Ordinance No. 203, Eden Farms, reclassification
of 11 lots from District Rural to RM 6.5. (Letter from Bather Ringrose
Wolsfeld, Inc., Engineers for Shelter Corporation, in response to
Mr. Andrew Daniluk's questions, attached).
Action: Motion approving Second Reading of Ordinance No, 203.
B. Resolution No. 659, uraina the Minnesota state Leaislature to
Jove the Public Employee's Retirement_DA)Benefits.
(Resolution and report from Finance Director are attached).
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 659.
C. Resolution No.6E6,urging Eden Prairie legislators to oppose Senate File
No_ 4111., abolishing the Township System of Relief in Hennepin
County. (Resolution and report from Village Clerk are attached.)
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 665.
v D. Second Reading - Ordinance No, 206, approving reclassification of
Creekwood Estates from District Rural to RI 13.5.
Action: Motion approving Second Reading of Ordinance No, 206.
J E. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 209, approving reclassification
of Basswoods, Site d2, from District Rural to RM 2.5.
Action: Motion approving Second Reading of Ordinance No, 209.
IV. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATION£:
J A. Letter from Eden Land fales. Inc, dated 3/5/73, offering the sale of
the Bienvale Golf Course to the Village of Eden Prairie. (Letters of
3/5/73 and 5/18/72 are attached)
Action:
B. j,etter from Congressman Frenzel, dated 2/28/73, requesting Village
of Eden Prairie's position on the proposed toll bridge over the
Minnesota River. (Letter attached)
Action:
1
Council Agenda
!' March 13, 1973
Page 3
V. REPORTS OF OFFICERS. BOARDS, AND COMMISSIONS;
A. Report of Councilman McCulloch:
Hennepin County League of Municipalities activities. (Attached)
— B. Report of Public Safety Director: _,
1. Annual Report of Eden Prairie Volunteer Fire Department. (Report
attached --Public Safety Director Hacking and Fire Chief Mitchell)
1 2. Discuss agreement with City of Hopkins for the use of the
Hopkins jail facilities. (ttk /t t C\
Action: Motion authorising the Mayor and ill ge Manager to enter
into an agreement with the City of Hopkins for the purpose
of using the jail facilities.
C. Report of Village Clerk:
Village Clerk's recommended License Application List dated
March 9, 1973. (Attached)
Action: Motion approving License Application List dated 3/9/73.
D. Report of Parks and Recreation Director:
Purgatory Creek Open Space Planning Study. (Report will be available
at meeting. Mr. Howard L. Peterson, Riley-Purgatory Board of
Managere will be present to discuss proposal.)
'i Action: Motion accepting the proposal of 1
to perform Open Space Planning for Purgatory Creek in the
amount not to exceed to be equally shared with
the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District and authorize
necessary base mapping of the study area in the amount of
E. Report of Village ManageE:
Council Meetings and Agendas. (Report dated 3/2/73 attached).
Action:
VI. FINANCES: "i 1 t iki
A. payment of Claims No, 1554 to 1641, (Attached) rQ g,if_/
Action: Motion approving payment of Claims No. 1664 to 1641.
B. Cash and Investment Report.
. Action: Motion accepting Cash and laves eat Re t
VII. ADTOURNMENT.
MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL
Tuesday, March 13, 1973 7:30 p.m. Vil l age Hall
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Paul Red path, Joan Meyers, John McCulloch, Wolf
Penzel, Roger oerger
COUNCIL STAFF: Village Manager Robert P Heinrich; Village Attorney Harlan
Perbix
I. MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 21, 1973.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to adopt the minutes of February 21
ae presented. Mr. Boerger seoonded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 27, 1973.
Page 3, Paragraph 4: The sentenoe "Recommendations 1 thru 5 excluding
4, substituting the following to be inoluded in the motion: That
this ;let is granted varianoee for Lots 4, 5 and 6 of HI ook 1 for
possible lot size reduction." shotld be etrioken from the minutes.
Page 5, Paragraph 1:
A motion was made by Mr- Boerger to close the hearing and adopt
Resolution No. 660 approving the RID Concept Plan for the Homart
Shopping Center. Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to approve the minutes of February
27, 1973 as oorrected. Mr. Penzel seoonded. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Trunk Watermain in Sonic Heights Road from Mitchell Road west to
Hiawatha Avenue. Project No. 72-8-21.
Mr. (t91rge Farnpw+orth of Brauer & Assooiates presented the feaei-
•
biity report. He indicated that approximately $32,000 woud be the
total projsot oost. The project isJpart of the Village trunk sys-
tem—an
extension of the Black and4eaoh 14n.
It was the oonoern of the members of the oounoil that the Hiawatha SF'
residents be made aware of the project. Mr. Jim Lindy, 8241
Hiawatha Avenue, voiced his interest in having the projectoom-
pleted and conveyed the affirmative wishes of the Middleburg resi-
dents and proporty owners of land south of Heidi'burg.
A motion was made by Mr. Penael to dose the hearing and to adopt
Resolution No. 662 approving Improvement Project No. 72-8-21 and
ordering preparatiosn of plans and specifications. Mrs. Meyers
seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Construction of Atherton Road, including lairal Water and Storm Sewer
from Mitohell Road easterly to the proposed East/West Parkway.
Project No. 72-9-17.
Mr. Farnsworth explained the projeot and informed the council members
of the anticipated cost of $102,000. Mr. Heinrioh, answering council
members queries about the Scenic Heights and Mitchell Road intersec-
tion, said that design information on 212 would have to be forth-
ooming before a decision regarding the interseotion could be made.
Mrs. Meyers made the motion to alose the hearing and to adopt
,e,,.I Resolution 663 approving Improvement Projeot No. 72-9-17 and order-
ing preparation of plans and specifications. The second was made
by Mr. Penzel. Motion carried with all members voting aye.
C. Mitchell Road Regrading, Paving, Curb and Gutter and Storm Sewer
tl1 from Scenic Heights Road south to the South line of Section 15.
Project No. 72-3-20.
ao
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel of oaing the hearing and adopting
Resolution No. 664 approving Improvement Project No. 72-3-20 and
ordering preparation of pans and specifications. Mr. Boerger
seconded. Motion carried after all eyed.
• e
• o D. Pubic Hearing on Proposed Liquor License Ordinance - Ordinance No. 202.
Presentation was made by Mr. Perbix. Cisoussion followed regarding
tic; investigative fees and Mr. Perbix was asked to reword these areas.
An appioant would be eUaeged required to make a $1500 deep deposit
ea to be used for investigative purposes with the unused portion of the
ao deposit returnable.
0
ray b N No action occurred as the second reading of Ordinance No. 202 is
tentatively set for Maroh 27, 1973.
III. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS:
A. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 203, Eden fe0s, reolassifioation of
11 lots from District Rural to RM 6.5. ego, 64,6 a-rrz..,yQ
Mr. Heinrich related how additional reports and information had been
secured as a result of Mr. Andrew Danil uk's questions.
Mr. McCulloch made the motion to amend Resolution b4/ to incor-
porate the Bather, Ringrose, iblsfeld, Inc.letter of March 13, 1973,
Timing of Development recommendations 1 thru 5; and the U. S. Depart-
ment of Agriouture letter authorted by Mr. Pat Kennedy of February 22
with its recommendations 1-8. This amendment is in addition to the
Eden Farms conceptual approval. Mrs. Meyers seconded. The motion
carried unanimously.
Mr. Boerger made the motion to adopt the second reading of Ordinance
203 and order pubished. Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted aye.
Motion carried.
6
MINUTES
Page 3
March 13, 1973
B. Resolution No 659, urging the Minnesota Statelegislature to
imlOve the Public Employee's Retirement (PERA) Benefits.
The PERA law changes were discussed after which Mr. Boerger made
a motion to adopt Resolution 659 urging the Minnesota State
Legis ature to improve PERA benefits. Mrs. Meyers seconded.
— Motion oarried unanimously. --
C. Resolution 665, wing Eden Prairie l.1.s litters to oppose Senate Fil e
No. 410, abolishing the Township Syyllstem of Relief in Hennepin County.
Mrs. Ho Imgren's notes of the Relief Board's annual meeting were dis-
cussed. The estimated 4.5 to 5 mill increase was covered.
Mr. NoCul I ough moved that Resolution 665 urging Eden Prairie
Legisators to oppose Sentae Fil e No.410 be adopted. Pr. Fenzel
seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Fenzel requested that a copy of Resolution 665 be sent to the
Human Rights Commission so that they would be aware of oounoi) action.
D. Seoond Reading — Ordinance No. 206, approving reclassification of
Creekwood Estates from Distriot Rural to RI 13.5.
h motion was made by Mr. Boerger to adopt the second reading of
Ordinance 206 and order pubished. Mrs. Meyers seconded. Motion
carried unanimously.
E. Seoond Reading — Ordinance No. 209, approving reolasssification of
Basswoods. Site d2, from District Rural to RM 2.5.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger and eeoonded by Mr. Penne to adopt
the second reading of Ordinance 209 and order pubished. Motion
carried unanimously.
IV. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS:
A. Letter from Eden Land Sales, Inc. dated 3/5/73. offering the ae(e of
the Edenvale Go If Course to the Village of Eden Prairie.
Mr. Don Peterson informed the counoil of the addition of a paved
parking lot, maintenanoe bulding, and cub house. These things attri-
bute:3the $100.000 prtee increase overlast year's price. If the
Village is interested. Mr. Peterson said, finanoing oonld be participation
revenue bonds which Eden land would be interested in purohaseing.
A motion was madeby Mr. Boerger and seconded by Mr. Passel to refer
the offer to the Village staff for investigation and report. Motion
carried unanimous I y.
•
MINUTES
March 13, 1973
Page 4
B. Letter from Congressman Frenzel, dated 2/28/73, requesting Village
of Eden Prairie's position on the proposed toll bridge over the
Minnesota river.
Mr. Joe Rimnaa and Mr. Myron Richards, representing 18-169 Corridor
Connittee, told the Council that because of the heavy burden al ready
on 35W and the antiquity of the other two bridges, private interests
were investigating the possibiity of a toll bridge crossing the
Minnesota at County Road 18. The bridge mould oost about $12 mill ion
dollars with 15,000 vehices at 25 cents amoritizing this cost. It
vas felt that a gasoine tax increase woud beunpopular.and that the
to l' was a way for buiding the four mil a of road and the bridge,
keeping the roadway free.
The Authority, when organized, would contain equal membership with L'-'.
seven directors--o??e,,, ..te�aa agenoy; one appointed rye'';
from the Oovernorj ind one' each oounty,Hennepin and Scott. fr'l'
By estabishing a toll bridge authority, tins is scoured to get i1,6lr
financial support for the projeot by issuing bonds. However, support
from all oommmunitiss plus accesses to the bridge would be required. i
It was hoped that the State woud build amuses bridge. ,,,,,,�1
It was the counoil 's concern that aeadrair oa�n e-Lhrw►Bh-by-EMse
eat the proper gem. The stretch between the bridge and 494
woud be a questionable area.
Mr. Richards indicated that Washington's Mondsle, l atniok, Frenzel,
and Humphrey were very interested. Senators Bang, Mlatz, and Lord
would be authoring the bill in the Minnesota senate. The enabling
Act prepared by Dorseylaw firm woud permit the communities to oom-
bine for the ale purpose of forming an authority for the oonstruotion
of a bridge. Maintenace would be handed by the State Highway Dept. as
well as polio'.
After the authority is formed, the State Highway Department wouli be
consulted and with Federal support the construotion cou d be done
by 1980. a ,0,D.,Fp.7` ,,d
Members of the Council requested a Dopy of the I nisi ationh - 6,"
nearing reports from the State-Utghway Lepartm ntr and firma ( r
' a rta. Mr.-"��inriah suggiletad`that the C�usa$- Beet*th- to �//`,
Hi .way representjtives. �sk!
V. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS: id �,w �/.7 c a ow
A. Report of Counci man MoCull ooh: 0x.../ J 4ti4
Hennepin Countyleague of Munioipalities activities.
Mr. Redpath reported that in the near future the Hennepin County
League you d be dispanded and a efforts mwu d be put into the
Metro League, which has more money,larger staff, and headquarters.
if
MINUTES
March 13, 1973
Page 5
B. Report of Put io Safety Director:
1. Annual Report of Eden Prairie Vol unteerFire Department
w This report was perPr d until the next counci meeting.
0
°a Vs 2. Agreement with City of Hopkins for the use of the Hopkins jail __
i l it.) faoilitites.
o b V ' The r eemeiit of$1 pe\booking and 3 per day�or the u e of
1.� °` . the j it faoilities was desired becatse county fsciI itie o
a a a • be ovs'rbrowded--or a quick return to thi scene may be neces ry.
1Oa��
Mr. MaCu I touch made a motion authorizing the Mayor and Vi I I age
Manager to enter into an agreement with the City of Hopkins for the
° 1f purposeof using the jail facilities. Mr. Penis' seconded.
I Motion carried unanimous)y.
0 li oe C. Report of Viage Clerk:
Vi I1age C ark's recommended License Application List dated 3/9/73.
1 a _Mrs. Meyers moved that thalicense Application List dated 3/9/73
e✓ o io with the addition of the Chart es Gould, 6285 c Lake Road,
g ° 9Kennel license for 18 adult dogs and p to six month
e d . pupsav Mr. Penzel seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
b b A .1", be emcee".
D. Report of Parks and Recreation Director:
i 1 1 Purgatory Creek Open Space Planning Study.
??el tq Tabled.
.4ws�
A
E. Report of Vill age Manager I
o Council Meetings and Agendas.
e c
tila i 1 This was tabled and will be included in a work session.
A 3 w - VI. FINANCES:
A. Payment of (aims No. 1 554 to 1641.
Mr. Penzel moved and Mrs.Meyers seconded the motion approving
payment of Claims No. 1554 to *IS 1641. Upon roll call, all voted
aye. Motion carried.
B. Cash and Investment Report.
A motion was made by Mrs, Meyers to accept the Cash and Investment
Report. Mr. Pencil seconded. On Roll call , all voted aye. Motion
carried.
The meeting adjourned at 11:00 P.M.
Susanne K. Lane
1
MHOS
EDEN PRAIRIM VILLAGE COUNCIL
Special Meeting 7:30 P.M., Village Hall
Wednesday, February 21, 1973
Members present were: Mayor Paul R. Redpath, Councilmen Panel,
Boerger, McCulloch and Councilman Joan Meyers. Also present was
Village Manager, Robert P. Heinrich, Village Attorney, W. Harlan
Perbix and Clerk, Edna M. Holiagren.
PUBLIC HEARIAG
Approval and Rezoning to C-Regional from District Rural of Approximately
100 Acres by Homart Development Company.
1. Hearing Declared Open by Mayor Redpath
The Mayor opened the hearing on Homart Development Company rezoning
end PUD approval.
2. Presentation by Homart Development Company
Jerry Sandvig, Homart Development Company reviewed and presented the
proposed shopping center project located on approximately 100 acres bounded
by West 78th Street to the north, U. S. Highway 169/212 to the west and
the proposed Ring Route to the south end east. He reviewed the November
24th,'1972 letter with their application and brochure'submitted. A series
of slides were shown of Homart projects in Texas, New York State, Mexico
City, Chicago and California.. Projected dates for the Maplewood end
Burnsville shopping centers mere set for 1974 end 1976 with Eden Prairie
in 1975. Mr. Sandvig stated that Hooart is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Sears and that they would be the only owners of the center during end after
completion. lie co amended ended the Village for planning done in regard to road
systems end open space, said that Eden Prairie had been selected for the
shopping center because of road patterns, the ring route around the cities
end a major commercial area.
Jim Winstead, the site planner then reviewed the project. He stated that
Powers and Sears and the two level parking lots are projected to open in
August of 1975. Drainage studies are being done by Soil Engineering,
that plans were to drain water to the south and west of the project to
Purgatory Creek then into the Minnesota River. Wayne lee, Architect
stated that the mall building would be two stories in height, said that
the Manager had been selected and that he had met with the Village staff.
Mr. Sandvig then outlined maintenance for the project and plans for public
safety. He then reviewed the schedule for the project, site construction
starts in June, 1973, building construction initiated in July, 1973,
utility construction ends in May, 1975 with opening on August 1, 1975.
3. Dick Putnam, Village Planner reviewed the Staff and Planning Ceamissioar'
recommendations, specifically Section 4A of the Staff Report, items 1
through 5, in regard to a Southwest Sector Transportation Study proposed.
The allocation, construction, signalling, etc. for the Ring Route is
listed in this section.
1.
Special Council Meeting
February 21, 1973
Page Two
4. The Mayor then opened the meeting for discussion and questions. The
Village Manager reviewed a Major Center Area Land Use -Tax Base Analysis
Memo dated February 21, 1973. He stated that the purpose of this analysis
was to examine alternative of land development and the probable impace in
the Major Center Area. The Major Center area is defined as the City of —
Bloomington and the Village of Edina to the east, City of Minnetonka on
the north, Baker Road on the west, and the East/West Parkway on the south
comprising approximately 1,000 acres.
He also stated that the analysis of the Hamart Shopping Center proposal
in the Major Center Area would indicate that the Village of Eden Prairie
would not receive a substantial tax revenue surplus but that the Eden
Prairie School District would benefit substantially because of the
proposed development.
Donald Sorensen, Willow Creek Road questioned how the Village bonding
rate would be affected with this development, the Manager told him that
it would be a substantial plus in the total debt. Bob Williams, Luther
Way was concerned about ring roads in the Ring Route, were they going to
be signaled? Deane Wenger, Barton Ashman Associates replied that sane
intersections of the ring route would have to be signaled. Mr. Williams
was also concerned about snow removal, the design of the spokes to the
Major Center might not facilitate the removal adequately. Mayor Redpath
replied that Homart was filly aware of the problem and would take steps
to solve it.
5. There being no further questions or comments from the audience, the
Mayor continued the hearing until the February 27th Council meeting and
asked for questions from the Council.
6. The Mayor asked why the Cinema had been planned out of the shopping
area at the work sessions that were held and now it was included in the
mall area. Mr. Ssndvig replied that it had been determined that business
was greater when placed in the center than out in another of the projects
of theirs. Mr. McCulloch asked how many cars the lots would hold, was
told that about 5,000 could be parked. The Mayor then asked what plans
for a fourth store would do to the original plan for three. Dick Putnam
replied that it would not substantially alter the character of the plan.
Mrs. Meyers asked if there would be an automotive center attached to the
rear of the Sears store,was told that there would be as it is in the
plans of all of their stores. The Mayor suggested that the exterior of
the buildings in the project be of a material that would enhance the site.
He was assured that it would be done well. Mr. McCulloch asked if the
heavy rains at times could be handled by Purgatory Creek. Bill Jensen,
Suburban Engineering replied that the plan is to detain water in the ponds
in the marsh area southwest of the center then an overflow to the creek,
providing buffer zones with water being released on a gradual scale.
7. There being no further questions or comments from the Council the
meeting adjourned at 11 p.m.
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk
11IPUTES
EDEN PI'AII'IE VILLAGE COUNCIL
Tuesday, Februar- 27, 1973 7:30 P.Ii., Village all
Members present were: Mayor Paul R. Redpath, Councilmen Fenzel and
Boerger and Council-oman Joan ileyers. Also '.resent was Village Manager,
Robert P. Heinrich, Village Attorney, ". Harlan Perbix and Clerk, Edna
M. Holmgren.
I. i1ITRITES OF REGULAR MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 31, 1973
A motion was made by ilr. Boerger to anprove the ninutes of February
13th with the fol to ing corrections:
"age 1. II. Presentation of liousin. Task Force Report. Addition to
”aragraph. firs. Sonja Anderson, to-Chairwoman of the Task Force
reviewed and ^resented the report to the Council. S':e stated that
tie Task Force had renuested twat a mobile none stud,/ he made in
regard to design, construction and placement on location.
Pane 3. Paragra h 3. That private restrictions and covenants shall be,
etc.
Page 3. D. The Oaks. Zachman Homes, Inc. Paragraph 1. 2nd Sentence.
It is rroposed on 86 acres which would contain cluster homes and
townhouses.
Pa a 4. Paragraph 2. 4th Sentence.
r. Garens, Castle Lane felt that it would not.
�Pa9e��4. 5th Paragraph. Item 2. A motion was made by firs. Meyers to
adopt Resolution No. 644, Edenvale 6th Addition with the recommendations
in the February 6th Planning Commission minutes 1 through 7 e)cluding
4 and the recommendations regarding placing of traffic signs by the
Public Safety Director dated February C, 1973.
Pane 6. Item E. Ordinance No. 203. Paragra?fi 2. A motion was made by
fir. McCulloch to continue the second reading of Ordinance No. 203
on February 27th. fir. Penzel seconded. All voted, etc.
Page 7. Item C. Resolution No. 651. A motion was made by fir. Penzel,etc.
Page B. Item 6. Last Paragraph. A motion was made by fir. Penzel
adopting Resolution Ho. 655 accepting the feasibility reports of the
Red Rock, etc. Mrs. Meyers seconded.
MINUTES OF JANUARY 23 1973. Page 3. Paragraph 5. Sentence 3.
All voted no unanimouT. ffotion denied.
Pith these corrections, fir. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
J
MINUTES
Page 2
February 27, 1973
II. APPOINTMENTS
_ A. Mayor's Appointment of Hrs. Kay Frick to Advisory Committee-CATV.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to approve the Mayor's appointment of
Mrs. Kay Frick to the Advisory Committee-CATV. Mr. Penzel seconded.
All voted aye. Motion carried.
B. Mayor's Appointment of Mr. Ray Earls as Assistant heed Inspector.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to approve the Player's appointment of
Mr. Ray Earls as Assistant Heed Inspector. Its. Meyers seconded. All
voted aye. (lotion carried.
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS Rezoning
A. CreekRuralwtodR1 13.5. FirstdReadingpment Corp.g. Ordinan
ce 1IoZ206. fPPre om Di
strict
Plat Approval. Resolution Ho. 645.
Bill Bonner, Hustad Development Corp. presented and reviewed the Creek-
wood Estates project. It is located on 26 acres containing 52 lots,
bordered on the south by County Road 1, on the west by Creek Knoll Road,
on the north by Purgatory Creek and on the east by the Pleasant Hill
Cemetary. Mr. Bonner reviewed the creek dedication near Creek Knoll Road
on the west and north part of the project_ Ile noted the rather distinct
ridge which falls away from the Creekwood project and to the creek
very steeply. He further talked about the low area on the north and
east Corp.side of the Creewod was doing furthero study tone
that llarea and reque stated ested aadditionaalti d Development
Hemfurthernsider reviewedeplansrforives andedicating land toto work th thedjacent Villageland owners.
for creek
trailway and preservation purposes. He further stated that the north
boundary and the northeast corner of the project are would be considered
at a later date.
Thor. :,ring no furt..er discussion, 11r. Penzei made a motion to close
tiie hearing and adopt t..r_ first reading of 1lydiaance Ilo. 206. Mrs. Iheyerr
wounded. 111 vf.ted aye. Motion carried.
firs. 11e;'ers made a notion to adopt Resolution do. 645 ap;,rovirQ the
preliminary plat of Creokwoud Estates including Planning Commission
recommendations of February 20, 1973 deleting item 4 with the following
suustitution: That this plat be granted 'variances un Lots 4, 5 and 6
of Block 1 for possible lot size reduction. Iir. Penzel seconded. All
voted aye. (lotion carried.
B. Basswoods, Site d2 The Preserve !lark Z. Jones. Request for Rezoning
from District Rural to Psi 2.5. First Reading., Ordinance No. 209.
Preliminary Plat Approval. kesolution lb. 64fi.
MINUTES
February 27, 1973
Page Three
Dick Putnam, Village Planner and Scott Godin, Hark Z. Jones reviewed
and presented the Basswood, Site d2 project. tir. Godin reviewed the
site plan with revisions after meeting with members of the various
commission, the Village Planner, the Developer and Architect in order to determine if the buildings should be located as far into the woods as
indicated on the initial plan. The revised plan would drop four units,
bringing the total to 62 units rather than 70 units. The easterly building
would now be in a straight line by approximately 40 feet pulling it almost
entirely out of the woods. The revised plan indicates a distance of over
100 feet between the buildi ngs. Parking is provided on this site for
approximately 24 guest spaces in front of the units with the remaining
parking under the building at a relationship of approximately 11/4 spaces
per unit. iir. Putnam stated that revisions to the site plan have been
centered around the basic issues of balance between buildings and preservation
of the natural site. Minimizing of the tree damage and maximizing of the
views for the units into the woods and the views to the north toward
Anderson Lakes is an ideal feature of this building site.
Mrs. Meyers commended the developer and architect for the work done on
this project to improve it.
There being no further discussion, Mr. Boerger made a motion to close
the hearing and adopt the first reading of Ordinance ilo. 2D9 rezoning
Basswoods site d2 from District Rural to RH 2.5. Mr. Penzel seconded.
All voted aye. Motion carried.
A motion was made by Ilr. Penzel to adopt Resolution No. 64D approving
the preliminary plat of Basswoods, Site d2 including the Planning
Commission recommendations of February 20, 1973. Recommendations 1 thru
5 excluding 4, substituting the following to be included in the motion:
That this plat is granted variances for Lots 4, 5 and 6 of Block 1 for pos-
sible lot size reduction. Iir. Buerger seconded. All voted aye. (lotion
carried.
C. Improvement Hearing for Extension of Sanitary Sewer Along Best 78th
Street from Purgatory_Creek to Rosemount Engineering Company. 72-7-25.
Resolution Mo. 649.
Dave Husby, Rieke, Carroll Huller presented and reviewed the extension
of sanitary sewer along Iles 78th Street. He stated that when they first
reviewed the project the estimated cost had been $80,000 but after soil
tests the area was found to contain some bad material hence the$120,000
cost had been estimated.
Paul Anderson, Attorney representing his father Calvin Anderson appeared
to oppose the installation of pipe. His father feels that the land is
not buildable or feasible at this point because of Highway 212 plans and
flood plain, asked that it be rejected. Itr. Husby stated that only the
buildable property would be assessed at the present time but that it would
be reassessed when more property becomes buildable. The Manager stated that
nothing would be assessed in the flood plain. He also said that Rosemount
Engineering has a great need for utilities. Dick Putnam, Village Planner
noted that as long as the property was being filled, there must be the
intent to use.
MINUTES
February 27, 1973
Page Four
There being no further questions or discussion, Mr. Boerger made a motion
to close the hearing and adopt Resolution Ho. 649 approving the extension
of sewer on West 78th Street and order plans and specs be prepared. Mr.
Penzel seconded. All voted aye. .lotion carried.
D. Improvement Hearing for Extension of Water Service to the Area Around
and Including Rosemount Engineering Company. HTR 72-8-24. Resolution
No. 661.
Fred Whiting, Black & Veatch presented and reviewed the extension of water
service on West 78th Street project. He recommended that after exploring
several ways of serving this area with water, he felt that the service
be provided from a lateral water main which will extend west approximately
2330 feet from a connection to a proposed 16 inch trunk water main along
Flying Cloud Drive. He also recommended that the lateral main be constructed
on the north side of the right-Of-way of 78th Street due to topography
considerations. The proposed water main to serve Rosemount area would be
12 inches and he feels that this will be adequate to provide dependable
sery ice and also future developments i n the area.
Paul Anderson again objected to the project, feels that the Village
is asking them to subsidize Rosemount.
There being no further questions or comments, Mr. Boerger made a motion
to close the hearing and adopt Resolution No. 661 approving the extension
of water service to the area around and including Rosemount Engineering
Company and order plans and specs be prepared. 11r. Penzel seconded. All
voted aye. Notion carried.
IV. ORDINANCES MD RESOLUTIONS
A. Second Reading, Ordinance No. 203. Eden Farms. Reclassification
of 11 Lots from District Rural to RH 6.5.
This item was postponed until ilarch 13, 1973.
8. Second Reading Ordinance No. 208. Basswoods, Side b. The Preserve.
Rezoning from District Rural to Rli 6.5.
A motion was made by fir. Penzel to adopt the second reading of Ordinance
No. 208 and order published. Mrs. leyers seconded. All voted aye.
Motion carried.
C. Homart Development Company. PUD Concept Approval of Approximately
100 acres. Resolution Ito. 66 . ezoning of Shopping 411 and
Parking Area from District Rural to C-Regional Shopping-Eden Prairie
Center. Ordinance No. 213, First Reading.
Dick Putnam presented and reviewed the proposed shopping center located
on approximately 100 acres bounded by West 78th Street to the north.
• U.S. Highway 169/212 to the west and the proposed Ring Route to the
south and east.
MINUTES
February 27, 1973
Page Five
lir. Putnam reviewed a condensed version of a Staff Report on this project.
He reviewed his recommendations 1 through 7 in regard to the PUD Concept
Plan, future development, C-Regional zoning, etc. Village Attorney,
Harlan Perbix suggested that this report be made a part of the resolution
approving the Concept Plan and also the Planning Report of December 29, 1972-
11r. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. fbtion carried.
A motion was made by Mr.Penzel to adopt the first reading of Ordinance
No. 213 approving reclassification of the Shopping Mall and Parking Area
from District Rural to C-Regional Shopping. Hrs. Meyers seconded. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
V. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND C0MMUNICATIONS
A. Letter from Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District, 2/14/73.
Marty Jessen, Park & Recreation Director reviewed a joint venture proposal
for open space planning along Purgatory Creek with the Council. He stated
that he felt that the scope of the joint study ought to include management
planning for natural habitats and hydrologic cycle of the creek, recreational
planning for the use of these resources and interpretive planning for en-
virorunental education and leisure education in the natural process. The
Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District stated in their letter of February
14th that they would be willing to participate in a study at a cost of
$5,000 provided that the Village would also be willing to participate in
such a study and expend a similar amount. lir. Jessen stated that he
understood that this amount could be used out of the Contingency Fund
in order to match the Watershed District proposal.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to request lir. Jessen to bring in more
detail for the March 13th meeting after working more with the Watershed
District and Brauer & Associates. Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted aye.
fbtion carried.
VI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COINIISSIOIlS
A. Report of Councilman McCulloch:
Hennepin County League of Municipalities Activities.
11r. I1cCulloch was absent from the meeting.
B. Report of Director of Parks and Recreation:
1. Status Report on Park Bond Fund.
Ir. Jessen reviewed the Park Bond Fund Status Report dated February 20,
1973 for the Mayor and members of the Council. He reported that the
current balance was $44,000; grants receivable of $292,896.25; purchases
payable of $519,062.50; grants receivable of $345,120.40 leaving a net
balance of $162,954.15. Future commitments in the amount of $1,265,230
were reported for Bryant Lake and Anderson Lakes options and grants
receivable in a like amount.
MINUTES
February 27, 1973
Page Six
2. Recommendation to Purchase Jim Boyce and Ed Woody Property
at Staring Calve for Park Purposes.
Jessen recommended purchase of the Jim Boyce and Ed Wood property
- of 15.5 acres on the south side of Staring Lake between the lake and
Flying Cloud Airport. Two appraisals have been completed on the property,
one ordered by the Village indicated a market balue of $85,250, the other
by Mr. Boyce and fir. Woody at 4.120,000. The 1970 market slue of the
property was $87,000 and 1972 at $180,000. The Village can purchase the
land for cash at a price of $120,000. This parcel has been funded out
of the 1971 LAWCON money for a lesser amount $80,000; however, based on
the appraisal by Mir. Boyce and also based on the recent condemnation award
on the Blesi property across the lake from this parcel, Fr. Jessen stated
that the $120,000 price appeared to be reasonable. He said an attempt
will be made to secure additional funding from LAl1CON and State sources
to cover the increased cost.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to approve the purchase of the Boyce/Woody
property for S120,000 for park purposes. firs. Meyers seconded. On roll
call, all voted aye. Motion carried.
3. Report on Condemnation Award for Gordon Blest Property at
Staring Lake. — -- - -Marty Jessen Jessen reviewed the Gordon Blesi condemnation award report dated
February 20, 1973 with the Mayor and members of the Council. tie stated
that the condemnation commission had completed its hearing and filed
an award for the Blest parcel as follows: Fee award $87,500 and $300
Appraisal Allowance. The parcel includes 10.591 acres plus a log cabin
in good condition. The Village had an appraisal done on the property
that indicated a value of $50,400. The landowner had an appraisal done
at $115,000. The value for tax purposes for 1973 is $75,900. lie noted
that LAWCON funding for one-half of an estimated value of$63,000 had
previously been approved. The Village will seek a LAl1C011 contract
amendment to cover the Federal Share of the increased cost. Ile said
that generally the Federal Share is increased when the cost is increased
as a result of a condemnation award.
A motion was made by 11r. Boerger to accept the condemnation award and
approve purchase of the Blesi property in the amount of $87,500 plus
$300 appraisal allowance if the property owner accepts. Hr. Penzel
seconded. On roll call. all voted aye. Motion carried.
4. Allocation of Ibney to Survey Properties Along Nine Nile Creek
for Park Purposes and Conduct a Naturalist Study of the Area
to be Used in the Design Process.
Marty Jessen. Park Director reviewed a request for funds to survey land
adjacent to Nine Mile Creek in the area of the recent park donation
from Northern States Power Company. He stated that the land that had
been donated was just west of I-494 along Nine Mile Creek. The donation
came about because of the effort on the part of certain private land
MINUTES
February 27, 1973
Page Seven
owners in that area working in conjunction with the Village Staff and
Northern States Power Co. in an attempt to develop a creekway trail
system/open space plan in that area. Included among these land owners
were the Howard Kaerwers, the Presbyterian Church and the Russell Marshs.
Mr. Marsh has presented a development proposal for his land, which
identifies the creekway for dedication as public open space. The Kaerwers
and Presbyterian Church representative have indicated a willingness to
donate the land owned by then to the Village. He indicated the only cost
to the Village in acquiring these properties would be for surveys necessary
to provide proper legal descriptions of the properties. It is estimated
that survey costs for these two parcels would be approximately $2,500.
By acquiring these two parcels, the Village would have ownership to all
of the land along Nine Ilile Creek between 494 and Baker Road.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to authorize survey work in the amount
of $2,50O for property along Nine Mile Creek to be used from the Park
Bond Fund. Mr. Redpath seconded. On roll call, all voted aye. Motion
carried.
C. Report from Village Clerk:
Village Clerk's Recommended License Application List dated
February 27. 1973.
A motion was made by firs. Meyers to approve the Clerk's recommended
license application list dated February 27th. Mr.Boerger seconded.
All voted aye. Motion carried.
D. Bid Award. Sub-Trunk Sanitary Sewer Improvement - Nine Mile One-A
TAN 72-1-12.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to award the bid for the Nine Mile One-A
Sub-Trunk Sanitary Sewer project to the lowest bidder American Contracting
Co. in the amount of S43,312. Mr. Penzel seconded. On roll call, all
voted aye. (lotion carried.
VII. FINANCES
A. Payment of Claims No. 1478 through 1553.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to approve payment of claims no. 1478
through 1553 for payment. hir. Redpath seconded. On roll call, all voted
aye. Motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 11:20 P.N.
Una M. lblmgren, Clerk
FT:ASII;TLITY REPORT ON PROP OSO
• PUBLIC WORKS IIiPROVENENTE
THE RED ROCK PLANNING SE(:'f•O;
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, NINNEF.OTA
•
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 13, 1973
AUTHORITY FOR STUDY
Brauer & Associates, Inc. has been retained by the Village of
Eden Prairie, Minnesota, by letter contract dntcd September 27, 1972,
to study the feasibility of several Red Rock ;"ren public works
improvements proposed for construction in 1973.
SCOPE OF TUTS STUDY
This study reviews the following proposed improwments:
•
a. Construction of trunk watermain in Scenic lie ,ht Road from
Mitchell Road west to Hiawatha Avenue.
b. Construction of Atherton Road including nr et-sir.: water and
Storm sewer 3 inns from Mitchell Road east^r i•• to the proposed
Natal-West Parkway.
c. Regrading, paving, construction of curb and gutter and
storm sewer in the. existing Mitchell Road right-of-way
from the intersection of Scenic heights Road and Mitchell
Road south to the south line of Section 15. •
LOCATION OF TT11'ROVE1ENTS •
The proposed improvement locations are shown on Plate Al attached
to this report.
METHOD OF STUDY
Data pertinent to preliminary design of the proposed improvements
and fur assessment of ti,ei.r economic justifi•.:atiea were gathered
by the consultant. Project design criteria were reviewed with the
Village staff for consistency with Village standards.
1 01'OSiiD SCENIC HEIGhTS ROAD TRUNK WATER MAIN
The proposed 16" watermain will begin at an existing 16" stub of
the 20" watcrmain located in Mitchell Road and will extend west
along the south side bf Scenic Heights Road to time east aide of
BRAUER 6 ASSOCIATES. INC. 1
' 1
Hiawatha Aveius, a distance of Collie 1,200 l.i.ueal feet. The proposed
.project also inclu:ic-, satermaiin, appurtenances: such as an air
release valve and fire hydrants and provides for restoration of
Scenic Heights Road surface after the main has br+n installed.
The proposed 16" main will provide immediate e r:'Ier to the lateral
watcrmains being installed in the first phase of Hipp's Mitchell
Heights Planned Unit Development and will provide service to the
Ray Mitchell property located on the southeast comer of Scenic
Heights Road and Hiawatha Avenue.
Costs of the proposed 16" watermain are esti.mcited as follows:
• 16" D.I.P. Water.main 1,220 l.f. @ $if, $17,080
6" D.I.P. 11atermain 70 1.f. @ 'i 560
16" Trap Butterfly Valve
& Box 1 each @ ?'') 1,200
6" Cate Valve & Box 2 each @ 400
Air Release Valve & Manhole 1 each @ .•RO! 800
Standard Hydrants 2 each @ ::40u 800
Fittings 3,000 lbs. @ ;U.6U 1,800
Bituminous Street Surfacing 200 ton @ 510.50 2i100
Subtotal $24,740
Engineering .& Administration 3,711 II
Subtotal $28,451
6% Capitalized Interest (6 months) 853
TOTAL. ESTIPATED PROJECT COST $29304
The p opoael 16" trunk watcrmain is part of tl,e planned Village-
wid a trunk watermaiu system and as such will provide ultimate
Village-wide benefit. Costs of the project, if authorized, will
therefore, be financed along with other currently authorized trunk
wnturmain extensions.
i'ROPOS?D ArHEPT07 ROAD CONSTRUCTION
The proposed project includes construction of Atherton Road from
Mitchell Load east to the approximate alignment of the proposed
I r,!;t-11e:t Parkway, 8" watcrmain extending the entire length of
Atherton Road with required appurtenances and storm sewer required
for drainage of surface water. The roadway and required utilites
have been requested by Shelter Development Corporation and New Town
Development Corporation.
The proposed roadway Is to be 28' wide between curbs with 7-ton
pavement strength and concrete curb and gutter. The roadway will
serve as a primary access to residential developments by Shelter
Development and New Town Development for residential traffic.
No parking will be allowed under these conditions. •
ERAUEE &ASSOCIATES, INC. 2
The proposed 8" wa termain will serve as a crrtene,a lateral for the
residential develorueuts adjacent to the roadway and will provide
looping to a trunk waterma.tn which is anticipateu in the future
East-West Partway.
Costs of the proposed project are estimated a:; fin lows; .
8" A.I.P. Patermain 1,550 1.f. t? $9 $13,950
Hydrants 3 each 0 $400 1,200
Cate Valves 6 each 0 $200 1,200
Fittings 2,000 lbs. @ $0.60 1,200
Tap Existing 20"Main 3. each 0 $1'r00 1,500
12" RCP Storm Sewer 900 l.f. @ $14 12,600
Standard Manholes 4 each fi W0 1,800
Catch Basins 6 each 0 5400 2,400
Common Excavation 5,000 yds. G! $i.30 6,500
Gravel Base 3,200 tuns 0 :1/,.25 13,600
Bituminous Paving 710 tons C $12 8,520
11-618 Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,040 l.f. 0 $4 12,160
Subtotal $76,630
. Engineering & Administration 13j793
Subtotal $90,423
6% Capitalized Interest (12 months) 5,425
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $95 848 •
If the project is authorized, it is proposed that all costs associated
with the project will be assessed to the beneF.itted property owners
on an equal share basis.
PROPOiflU I1I'1'C11LLL ROAD PIPR0V1YENTS
The proposed improvament includes upgrading Mitchell Road from the
Scenic Heights Road intersection to the south line of Suction 15.
The project includes improvement of grades, construction of 36'
wide pavement with curb and gutter and constru,.tion of storm sewer
for surface drainage.
After consultation with Village staff a 36' width and 9 ton pavement
strength are proposed. The proposed improvement will be located entirely
Within the existing; Mitchell Road right—of-way width of 66' which is
sufficient for the yroposed 36' pavement.
It is anticipated that Mitchell Road will become a major route to
the future Red Rock Village Center to be located in the Starring - •
Lake area. The proposed width and strength will serve anticipated
traffic volumes if the entire length is designated for no on-street
parking in either lane.
BRAUER & ASSOCIATES. INC. 3
:�I o:a . •.1 i . 1-?.cry .,1 a11..',Le necessary to orani continuo jea aueas
• in the rvadva:'.
The costs of the proposed project are est mal i d a!: follows:
Common Excavation 5,300 c.y. @ $0.1.'i $ 3,975
Sub-.au: Excavation 7,000 c.y. @ $1 .15 8,750
1-1/7" 2341 Wearing 547 tons @ $7.00 3,829
2" 2331 Binder 741 tons @ $6.50 14,817
5" Class 5 Aggmgate 1.,930 tons @ $3.50 6,755 •
— 7" Class 3 Aggregate 2,920 tons @ $3.50 10,220 _
Asphalt Cement 77 tons @ $40.00 3,080
Tack Coat 355 gal. @ $0'0 142
Prime Coat 2,128 gal. @ $0.30 638
11-618 Curl, & Gutter 3,750 1.f. @ $3.15 14,062
Manholes 2 each 0 $400 800
Catch Basins 7 each @ $350 2,450
• 18" RCP Class II (0-8') 855 1.f, @ $1 1,00 9,405
24" RCP Class II (0-8') 600 1.f. @ $1.`,.n0 9,000
Class A RLprap 10 c.y. @ 'llt1•'ii' 80
Type. I PiLtcr Blanket 5 c.y. @ ;.S•'!I' 25
Sod in-place 800 s.y. @ $i "0 800
Seed 1 acre @ $100 700
Subtotal $79,528
Engineering &Administration @ 16i; 14,315
Subtotal $93,843
, 6% Capitalized Interest (12 months) . 5,630
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $99,473
Property owners immediately adjacent to the proposed improvement are
Zachnlaa llomes, Inc. and llipp's Construction Company on the went side
of Mitchell Road and Now Town Development and Shelter Development
on the east. The later three owners have formally petitioned for
the propoued improvement.
It is pro,00sed that owners immediately adjacent to and benefitted
by the liitchell load improvement be assessed on a front-foot basin.
The preliminary amount of each assessment would be computed as
follows
i
Approximate Front Footage Improved =3,630 1.f.
Total Assessment/Front Foot - $99,173 '$27.00/1.f.
3,6801.f.
Zachnian homes 680 1.f. @ $27.00 $18,360
lliPP's Construction Company 1160 1.f. @ $27.00 31,320
Shelter Development Corp. 720 1.f. @ $27.00 19,440
New Town Development Corp. 1120 1.f. @ $27.00 30c240
Total $99,360
(NOTE: All quantities estimated.)
BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4
ENGINEER'S RECOMNEND\T] :G
The above described improvements have been rcvie''ed by the Village
staff. Design details established are consist cut with Eden Prairie
standards and conform to existing development plans for the Red
Rock area.
If the proposed projects are authorized, it is recommended that '
all three projects be combined and authorized for final design as
one single project. If this is the case, total project cost is
estimated as follows:
Scenic lleights Trunk Rater $ 29,304
Atherton Road Construction 95,848
Mitchell Road Improvements _99,413
Tota]. Estimated $224,625
•
If authorized immediately, the project will proocrNd in accordance with
• the following schedule:
Final Plans and Specifications
Approved Ai•rii 10, 1973
Bid Opening 11:v 1 O, 1973
Award of Contract My 22, 1973
Begin Construction June 15, 1973
Substantial Completion Scptvmber 15, 1973
Final Completion November 1, 1973
•
/;filf.'Ree7.1
Itted by: d
0(Georgc(,:�. Farnsworth, P.E.
BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
loin
•
•
•
•
5 I
BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1
._. / .' \ \,./.....,, A•iiil /' ............._:. r\
, -,•0 9 i ,r. a
I — - — .
....-
....
,,,•....
__
—-- — -- -- k•-,,.,%C): ,,11-'i - -- I Li— ta I' - .,'"
• / 0— ../l'I.;
-.......„------:1:"‹•- i
ti-;! L. ,,.!__._ _ .—,
'" 1 X1 v, V ! 1----, / I A 0
--
-N;;' -
c....,:
.... _,,/
i ---
:_v)..,::,
,-,#.!-z%;<• •,' ' • , 1., ; i - 4'.1 P,..
XIII •\.:\ 4, •,, , I
?1,•,, i -- .--, ___ •0 3 Y ,
•--1, i.•C,,f,_..
-L .'\
• ..., ,
, .... ,.
,..t,,.
,_
i, i . ,
"-- --•!..1 f i,;!:•1(.,..:
, , )•\\..-...,,... L.c:.;•
\
. 1....... '\*,‹;..,.. ..,4,,r
---.., •
/
— -l11:1
f ;-• i N.! 11(?;:
'-- 71 • : .
.\.
do/....„...,. i.:,.',:j''I\:...,(:). . . 111. :_ .,i -- 1, //////'i'(.,_ i .
...._:o4.0.._ Li.
li
-----.- i:.•;
.3...-irzw,...- —71-•,•••••, ,.:::,....,.. \.,..,,._1 .. r'''
----'.1-•--,:.!..-.,,,V,5,J) '' 4- ( - • Jil `-' , .',, 1 r, d ' I
-' . i . •
' ) (77-!1_,.•, ,-' .-,., ,.• .- ..,,,,k-'," 1 - 7-----7i,:i:,...:,
-., .,,,;,:i . ; ,.,) .... _ •
____i_ — i• E.-- , , ——7:-.- -\--i\'<,.]'. .,- -
Z (.•4::
0,3 ,.a 1(_(:. .., i ...:.,-:,,L1 . 4_ i•r, .
L t
----.1.---- . .. ------
-, 1
•/ ti'S,;
i 1'•.0 I ' ...`.: _-_-,_-_- s
'''. ;
..• — .
..:.
i ----''''
•A • I • I t •11 e.• •
.c/-.0.....,i ; ' ••••-• ; ! .1 '' •—
,_ .,.::.1 14 !14 "...E. ; 1'' -----k,..:-i -----t...:5/;-;" ---t&'''''''•.:i '') ' ,1"--er"-WN.... -.:1; -
:---.").--- - 71..,, i )' ' I.Y.: 'j'' .r. ! I: - 1 --if 4.1> Ill rr., i 1 .; ,. 1 '‘
z(iti ) - il 1.- 0 r I; I .-0i;,"*".1 .1 i 1 ' — -— •.,...,
—71'7 II 1 ii'll N 1 .... I
. , •—.'s V). I ; i
---1- ,.-.:-.,t,- I, Ji_l. p, t_..... -1.• _ • , i i • • --- •., I -
--! 1,,y,.4, - li - I • -Itti_i.\\ --- . .
i "e N . I
1 h.'4 IL—---.,: (, i 4r=--- --r.L-r= r's,r7i— —
LI, n i,i
\ , i::: ,.." , 1 "r :1_, •___ !,
1,1 -...r„, __ a,c,-..".• e
, 1...,i,i • i
_._
._ 7_
— ---
,...---CIN
• r,
\ -,C9:4;,'T
-N- \.....\
s.
..I illii I 1
•
• i
• ESTIMATE OF COST
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
RED ROCK PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS •
SCENIC HEIGHTS ROAD TRUNK WATERMAIN
IMPROVEMENT NO. 72-8-21
HEARING DATE: March 13, 1973
PROJECT LOCATION: North half of the South half of Section 15, Township
116, Range 22, within the Scenic Heights Road
right-of-way beginning approximately at. the inter-
section of Scenic Heights' and Mitchell Roads,
then West within the Scenic Heights Road right-
of-way to the intersection of Hiawatha Avenue
and Scenic Heights Road.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of approximately 1 ,200 1.f. of
16" trunk watermain and required appurtenances.
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $32,042.00
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT METHOD: Project is part of the Village water
system.
AiVED BY: /
( '"f/7/`- . `J�Qi42.,ja!�4��/
,/Georg ;A. Farnsworth, P.E.
•
Robert Heinrich, Vill age Manager
se
SCENIC HEIGHTS ROAD TRUNK WATERMAIN
RED ROCK PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS
IMPROVEMENT NO. 72-8-21
• ESTIMATED QUANTITIES MATERIAL UNIT PRICES TOTAL
1,Y20 1.f. 16" O.I. P. Watermain $ 14.00 $1 7,080.00
70 1.f. 6" O.I.P. Watermain 8.00 560.00
50 1.f. 8" D.I.P. Watermain 9.00 450.00 7
1 each 16" Trap Butterfly Valve& Box 1,200.00 1 ,200.00
2 each 6" Gate Valve & Box 200.00 400.00
1 each Air Release Valve &Manhole gOO.00 800.00
2 each Standard Hydrants 400.00 800.00
3,000 lb. Fittings 0.60 1,800.00
200 ton Bituminous Street Surfacing 10.50 2,100.00 i
Construction Cost Subtotal 625,190.00
Add 20% Engineering, Administration 5,038.00
Add 6% Capi talized Interest (6% for 12 mos.) 1,814.00 1
( TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $32,042-00
I'
1
(.
ESTIMATE OF COST
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
• RED ROCK PUBL IC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS
ATHERTON ROAD CONSTRUCTION
IMPROVEMENT NO. 72-9-17
HEARING DATE: March 13, 1973
PROJECT LOCATION: The project is located entirely within a 44-foot
right-of-way, the centerline of which begins at a
point 22 feet North of the intersection of the
centerline of Mitchell Road and the South line
of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter,
Section 15, Township 116, Range 22, then runs East
parallel to the South line of the Northwest Quarter
of the Southwest Quarter, Section 15 to the West
line of the East-West Parkway right-of-way. The
entire project is within the South half of Section
15, Township 116, Range 22.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of new roadway including rough grading,
base and surface pavements, concrete curb and gutter
and drainage structures and lateral watermain.
Estimated length of roadway is 1,500 1.f.
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $102 193.81
(including construction cost, engineering, administration and capitalized
interest)
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT METHOD: It is proposed that parcels immediately
adjacent to the proposed improvement be assessed
equal shares of the improvement cost.
ALLOCATION: Section 15, Parcel 4500 @ $51,096.90
(Estimated) Section 15 , Parcel 5000 @ $51,096.90
APPfj,1VED BY%/
� r•-#r"/mil' l 74^t
/George f . Farnsworth, P.E.
Robert Heinrich, Village Manager
k
ATHERTON ROAD CONSTRUCTION
RED ROCK PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS
IMPROVEMENT NO. 72-9-17
•ESTIMATED QUANTITIES MATERIAL UNIT PRICES TOTAL
L.S. Mobilization $ 0.75 $ 5,000.00
3,000 c.y. Common Excavation 0.75 2,250.00
2,025 c.y. Subgrade Excavati on 0.75 1,518.75
2,025 c.y. Subgrade Backfill 5.00 10,125.00
•
520 ton 2" Wearing Course 8.50 4,420.00
1,100 ton 4" Class 5 3.50 3,850.00
1,450 ton 6" Class 4 3.50 5,075.00
35 ton Asphalt Cement 40.00 1,400.00
1
1,500 gal. Prime Coat 0.30 450.00
2,700 1.f. B618 Modified Curb & Gutter 3.50 9,450.00
2 each Adjust Frame & Ring 75.00 150.00
10D 1.f. Remove Fence 3.00 300.00
1,100 .sy. Sod 1.00 1,100.00
1 acre Seed 500.00 500.00
3,500 s.y. Furnish & Place Topsoil 0.50 1,750.00
8 1.f. 12" R.C.P. 8.50 68.00
200 1.f. 15" R.C.P. 9.50 1,900.00 1
688 1.f. 18" R.C.P. 11.00 7,568.00
52 1.f. 24" R.C.P. 12.50 650.00
66 1.f. 27" R.C.P. 15.00 990.00
6 each Manhole 450.00 2,700.00
1 each Catch Basin 400.00 400.00
1,014 l.f. Class "B" Bedding 1.00 1,014.00
10 c.y. Class "A" Rip Rap 25.00 250.00
2 each Flared End Section 75.00 150.00
a. ` L.S. Connect to Existing 20" Mai at 1,500.00
1,550 1.f. 8" Watermain 8.00 12,400.00
154 1.f. 6" Watermain 6.00 924.00
3 each Hydrants 425.00 1,275.00
t 2 each 8" Gate Valve & Box 225.00 450.00
7 each 6" Gate Valve & Box 175.00 1,225.00
•
1,500 lb. Fittings 0.60 900.00
Construction Cost Subtotal S 81,702.75
Add 18% Engineering, Administration 14,706•.00
Add Capitalized Interest (6% for 12 mos.) 5,784.56
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST S102,193.81
•
C
a
,,mot,-.. , —_
•
• ESTIMATE OF COST
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
RED ROCK PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS
MITCHELL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
IMPROVEMENT NO. 72-3-20
HEARING DATE: March 13, 1973
PROJECT LOCATION: Wi thin the Mitchell Road right-of-way begi nning
approximately 250 feet South of the intersections
1 of the centerl i nes of Mitchell and Scenic Heights
Roads then South within the Mitchell Road right-
of-way to approximately the South line of Section
15, Township 116, Range 22.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the surface of Mitchell Road
including regarding, construction of base and
surface course pavements, concrete curb and gutter
and drainage structures.
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1O2,521.98
(including construction cost, easement cost, engineering, admi nis-
tration and capitalized interest)
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT METHOD: It is proposed that Mitchell Road
imp rovements be assessed to parcels immedi a tely
adjacent to the improvement on a front-foot
basis. •
ALLOCATION: Section 15, Parcel 4500 @ 1056 1.f.
(Estimated Section 15, Parcel 5000 @ 669 l .f.
front footage) Section 16, Parcels 2800, 3630 @ 1,056 l.f.
Sec tion 16, Parcel 6500 @ 669 1.f.
TOTAL ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT FOOTAGE: 3,450 1.f.
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST PER FRONT FOOT: $29.72
A/P OOVED BY7ey
/George.' . Farnsworth, P.E.
Robert Heinrich, Village Manager
MITCHELL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
RED ROCK PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS
IMPROVEMENT NO. 72-3-20
.ESTIMATED QUANTITIES MATERIAL UNIT PRICES TOTAL
2,300 c.y. . Common Excavation $ 0.75 $ 1 ,725.00
547 ton 1P' 2341 Wearing Course 8.00 4,376.00
741 ton 2" 2331 Binder Course 7.50 5,557.50 -
1,930 ton 5" Class 5 3.50 6,755.00
3,750 ton 7" Class 4 3.50 13,125.00
77 ton Asphalt Cement 40.00 3,080.00
355 gal. Tack Coat 0.40 142.00
2,128 gal. Prime Coat 0.30 638.40
3,750 1.f. 8618 Modified Curb & Gutter 3.50 13,125.00
5,600 s.y. Furnish & Place Topsoil 0.50 2,800.00
800 s.y. Sod 1.00 800.00
1 acre Seed 500.00 500.00
136 1.f. 12" R.C.P. 8.50 1,156.00
207 1.f. 15" R.C.P. 9.50 1,966.50
209 1.f. 18" R.C.P. 11.00 2,299.00
186 1.f. 24" R.C.P. 12.50 2,325.00
70 1.f. 27" R.C.P. 15.00 1 ,050.00 1
I
142 1.f. 30" R.C.P. 18.00 2,556.00
255 1.f. 33" R.C.P. 27.00 6,885.00
6 each Manhole 450.00 2,700.00
1,205 1.f. Class "B" 8edding 1.00 1 ,205.00
2 each Flared End Section 75.00 150.00
15 c.y. Class "A" Rip Rap 25.00 375.00
7 each Catch 8asin 400.00 2,800.00
3 each Connect to Existing 150.00 450.00
( 1 L.S. Outlet Structure & Channel 3,O0000
Construction Cost Subtotal $ 81 ,541.40
Add 18% Engineering, Administration 14,677.45
Add Easement Cost 500.00
Add Capitalized Interest (6% for 12 mos.) 5,803.13
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST S102,521.98
.- I
•
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 202
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO LICENSING AND REGULATING
THE USE AND SALE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR
The Village Council of the Village of Eden Prairie ordains as follows:
Section I-101. Definition of Terms.
Subd. 1. The terms "intoxicating liquor" shall mean and include
ethyl alcohol and include distilled, fermented, spiritous, vinous, and
malt beverages containing in excess of 3.2% of alcohol by weight.
Subd. 2. The terms "sale" and"sell" mean and include all barters
and all manners or means of furnishing intoxicating liquor or liquors as above
described in violation or evasion of law.
Subd. 3. The term "off sale" means the sale of intoxicating liquor
in the original package in retail stores for consumption off or away from
the premises where sold.
Subd, 4. The term "on sale" means the sale of intoxicating liquor
by the glass, or by the drink for consumption on the premises only.
Subd. 5. The term "wholesale"means and includes any sale for
purposes of resale. The term "wholesaler"means any person engaged
in the business of selling intoxicating liquor to retail dealers.
Subd. 6. The term "manufacturer" includes every person who, by
any process of manufacture, fermenting, brewing, distilling, refining,
rectifying, blending, or by the combination of different materials, prepares
or produces intoxicating liquors for sale.
Subd. 7. As used in this ordinance, the term "person" includes a
natural person of either sex, co-partnership, corporation and association
of persons and the agent or manager of any of the aforesaid. The singular
number includes the plural and the masculine pronoun includes the
feminine and neuter.
Subd. 8. The terms "package"or "original package" means any
corked or sealed container or receptacle holding intoxicating liquor.
q
Ordinance No. 202
Page Two
Subd. 9. The term "hotel"means and includes any establishment
having a resident proprietor or manager, where, in consideration of
payment therefor, food and lodging are regularly furnished to transients,
which maintains for the use of its guests not less than 100 guest rooms ---
with bedding and other usual, suitable and necessary furnishings in
each room, which is provided at the main entrance with a suitable lobby,
desk, and office for the registration of its guests
which employs an adequate staff to provide suitable and usual service,
and which maintains under the same management and control as the rest
of the establishment and has, as an integral part thereof,a dining room
with appropriate permanent facilities for seating not less than 100 guests
at one time, where the general public are, in consideration of payment
therefor, served with meals at tables.
Subd. 10. The term"restaurant" means any establishment, other
than hotel, under the control of a single proprietor or manager, having
appropriate facilities to serve meals and for seating not less than 150
guests at one time, and where in consideration of payment therefor,
meals are regularly served at tables to the general public,and which
employs an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable service
to its guests, and the principal part of the business of which is the
serving of foods.
Subd. 11. The term"club"means and includes any corporation duly
organized under the laws of the State for civic, fraternal,social or
business purposes or for intellectual improvement or for the promotion
of sports which has been in existence for more than 15 years, and any
congressionally chartered veteran's organization which has been in
existence for more than 10 years prior to January 1, 1961,which shall
have more than fifty members, and which shall, for more than a year
have owned, hired, or leased a building or space in a building of such
extent and character as may be suitable and adequate for the reasonable
and comfortable accommodation of its members and whose affairs and
management are conducted by a board of directors, executive committee,
or other similar body chosen by the members at a meeting held for that
purpose, none of whose members, officers, agents or employees are
paid directly or indirectly any compensation by way of profit from the
distribution or sale of beverages to the members of the club or to its
guests, beyond the amount of such reasonable salary or wages as may
be fixed and voted each year by the directors or other governing body.
Subd. 12. The term"age of majority" shall be as defined by
Minnesota Statutes.
Ordinance No. 202
Page Three
Section I-102. License Required.
Subd. 1. No person except wholesalers or manufacturers to the
extent authorized under State License, and except the municipal liquor
dispensary, shall directly or indirectly deal in, sell, or keep for sale
any intoxicating liquor without first having received a license to do so
as provided in this ordinance. Licenses shall be of two kinds: "On
Sale" and "On Sale Club".
Subd. 2. "On Sale" licenses shall be issued only to hotels and
restaurants.
Subd. 3. "On Sale Club" licenses shall be issued only to clubs.
Section I-103. Number of Licenses Issued.
It is hereby declared to be the public policy of the Village of Eden Prairie
to issue one less "on sale" liquor license than authorized by State laws
and to thereby avoid the abandonment of the municipal "off sale" liquor
store operations. Unless otherwise authorized by a majority of voters
vot,,,y on the question at a special election call for such purpose, the
Vill„;e Council shall not issue the maximum number of liquor licenses
autiorized by Minnesota Statutes 340:353.
Section I-104. Applications for License.
Every application for a license to sell intoxicating liquor shall be verified
and filed with the Village Clerk. In addition to the information which may
be required by the State Liquor Control Commissioner's form, the application
shall contain the following:
Subd. 1. Whether the applicant is a natural person, corporation,
partnership or other form of organization.
Subd. 2. Type of license applicant seeks.
Subd. 3. If the applicant is a natural person, the following information:
(A) True name, place and date of birth, and street resident address
of applicant.
(B) Whether applicant has ever used or been known by a name
•
other than his true name and, if so, what was such name.
• or names, and information concerning dates and places
where used.
Ordinance No. 202
Page Four
(C) The name of the business if it is to be conducted under a
designation, name or style other than the full individual
name of the applicant; in such case a copy of the certifica-
tion, as required by Chapter 333, Minnesota Statutes,
certified by the Clerk of the District Court, shall be
attached to the application.
(D) Whether applicant is married or single. If married, true
name, place and date of birth and street resident address
of applicant's present spouse.
(E) Whether applicant and present spouse are registered voters
and if so, where.
(F) Street address at which applicant and present spouse have
lived during the preceding ten years.
(G) Kind, name and location of every business or occupation
applicant or present spouse have been engaged in during
the preceding ten years.
(H) Names and addresses of applicant's and spouse's employers
and partners, if any, for the preceding ten years.
(I) Whether applicant or his spouse, or a parent, brother, sister
or child of either of them, has ever been convicted of any
felony, crime or violation of any ordinance, other than
traffic. If so, the applicant shall furnish information as to
the time, place and offense for which convictions were had.
(J) Whether applicant or his spouse, or a parent, brother, sister
or child of either of them has ever been engaged as an
employee or in operating a saloon, hotel, restaurant, cafe,
tavern or other business of a similar nature. If so, applicant
shall furnish information as to the time, place and length of
time.
(K) Whether applicant has ever been in military service. If so,
applicant shall, upon request, exhibit all discharges.
(L) The name, address and business address of each person who
is engaged in Minnesota in the business of selling, manufac-
turing or distributing intoxicating liquor and who is nearer of
Ordinance No. 202
Page Five
kin to the applicant or his spouse than second cousin,
whether of the whole or half blood, computed by the rules
of civil law, or who is a brother-in-law or sister-in-law
of the applicant or his spouse.
Subd. 4. If the applicant is a partnership, the names and addresses
of all partners and all information concerning each partner as is required
of a single applicant in Subdivision 3 above. A managing partner, or
partners, shall be designated. The interest of each partner in the
business shall be disclosed. A true copy of the partnership agreement
shall be submitted with the application and,if the partnership is required
to file a certificate as to a trade name under the provisions of Chapter 333,
Minnesota Statutes, a copy of such certificate certified by the Clerk of
District Court shall be attached to the application.
Subd. 5. If the applicant is a corporation or other organization and
is applying for an "on sale" license, the following:
(A) Name, and if incorporated, the state of incorporation.
(B) A true copy of Certificate of Incorporation, Articles of
Incorporation or Association Agreement and By-Laws and if
a foreign corporation, a Certificate of Authority as described
in Chapter 303, Minnesota Statutes.
(C) The name of the manager or proprietor or other agent in
charge of the premises to be licensed, giving all the infor-
mation about said person as is required of a single applicant
in Subdivision 3 above.
(D) Notwithstanding the definition of interest as given in
Section I-104, Subdivision 10, the application shall contain
a list of all persons who, singly or together with their
spouse, or a parent, brother, sister or child or either of
them, own or control an interest in said corporation or
association in excess of 5% or who are officers of said
corporation or association, together with their addresses
and all information a s is required of a single applicant in
Subdivision 3 above.
Subd. 6. If the application is for an"On Sale Club" license, the
following information:
(A) The name of the club.
Ordinance No. 202
Page Six
(B) Date that club was first incorporated. True copies of the
Articles of Incorporation, By-Laws, and the names and street
addresses of all officers, executive committee and board of
directors shall be submitted.
(C) A sworn statement that the club has been in existence for
more than fifteen years or, in the event that the applicant
is a congressionally chartered veteran's organization, in
existence for more than ten years prior to January 1, 1961.
The statement shall be made by a person who has personal
knowledge of the facts statea therein. In the event that no
person can make such a statement, satisfactory documentary
proof may be submitted in support of such facts.
(D) The number of members.
(E) The name of the manager, proprietor or other person who
shall be in charge of the licensed premises together with
the same information concerning such person as is required
of a single applicant for an "on sale" license as is set
forth in Subdivision 3 above.
Subd. 7. The exact legal description of the premises to be licensed
together with a plot plan of the area showing dimensions.and location
of buildings.
Subd. 8. An applicant for an "on sale" license shall submit a floor
plan of the dining room, or dining rooms, which shall be open to the
public, shall show dimensions and shall indicate the number of persons
intended to be served in each of said rooms.
Subd. 9. The amount of the investment that the applicant has in
the business, building, premises, fixtures, furniture, stock in trade,
etc., and proof of the source of such money.
Subd. 10. The names and addresses of all persons, other than the
applicant, who have any financial interest in the business, buildings,
premises, fixtures, furniture, stock in trade;the nature of such interest,
Ordinance No. 202
Page Seven
amount thereof, terms for payment or other reimbursement. This shall
include, but not be limited to, any lessees, lessors,mortgagees,
-- mortgagors, leadors, lien holders, trustees, trustors and persons who have cosigned notes or otherwise loaned, pledged, or extended security
for any indebtedness of the applicant, but shall not include persons
owning or controlling less than a 5% interest in the business, if a
corporation.
Subd. 11. The names, residences and business addresses of three
persons, residents of the State of Minnesota,of good moral character,
not related to the applicant or financially interested in the premises or
business, who may be referred to as to the applicant's character or, in
the case where information is required of a manager,the manager's
character.
Subd. 12. Whether or not all real estate and personal property taxes
for the premises to be licensed which are due and payable have been paid;
and if not paid, the years and amounts which are unpaid.
•
Subd. 13. Whenever the application for an "on sale" license to sell
intoxicating liquor, or for a transfer thereof, is for premises either planned
or under construction or undergoing substantial alteration, the application
shall be accompanied by a set of preliminary plans showing the design of
the proposed premises to be licensed. If the plans or design are on file
with the Building Department, no plans need be filed with the Village Clerk.
Subd. 14. Such other information as the Village Council shall require.
Section I-105. Renewal Applications.
Applications for the renewal of an existing license shall be made at least
• 90 days prior to the date of the expiration of the license. If, in the
Judgment of the Village Council, good and sufficient cause is shown by an
applicant for his failure to file for a renewal within the time provided,
the Village Council may, if the other provisions of this ordinance are
complied with, grant the application.
At the earliest practicable time after application is made for a renewal
of an "on sale" license, and in any event prior to the time that the appli-
cation is considered by the Village Council, the applicant shall file with
the Village Clerk a statement prepared by a certified public accountant
that shows the total gross sales and the total food sales of the restaurant
for the twelve-month period immediately preceding the date for filing
renewal applications. A foreign corporation shall file a current Certificate •
of Authority.
. Ordinance No. 202
Page Eight
Section I-106. Execution of Application.
If the application is by a natural person, it shall be signed and sworn to
by such person; if by a corporation, by an officer thereof; if by a partner-
ship, by one of the partners;if by an unincorporated association , by the
manager or managing officer thereof. If the applicant is a partnership, the
application, license and bond (or insurance policy) shall be made and
issued in the name of all partners.
Section I-107. License Fees.
Subd. 1. The annual license fee for "on sale" license shall be in
an amount as set forth in of the Village Ordinances. The
annual license fee for an "on sale club" license shall be $100.00.
Subd. 2. The annual license fee shall be paid in full before the appli-
cation for a license is accepted, All fees shall be paid into the general
fund of the Village. All licenses shall expire on the last day of December of
each year. Upon rejection of any application for a license,or upon with-
drawal of application before approval of the issuance by the Village Council,
the license fee shall be refunded to the applicant.
Subd. 3. The fee for an "on sale"or "on sale club" license granted after
the commencement of the license year shall be prorated on a daily basis.
• Subd. 4. When the license is for premises where the building is not
ready for occupancy, the time fixed for computation of the license fee for
the initial license period shall be as bllows:
If building construction commences within 120 days after
issuing the license, the license fee shall commence one
year after issuance of the license by the Village Council
or upon the date the building is ready for occupancy,
whichever is sooner.
If building construction is not commenced within 180 days
after issuing the license, the license granted hereinunder will
be void.
Subd. 5. No transfer of a license shall be permitted from place to
place or person to person without complying with the requirements of an
original application except as provided by Subdivision 9 of this Section.
Subd. 6. No part of the fee paid for any license issued under this
ordinance shall be refunded except in the following instances upon
application to thelCouncil within 30 days from the happening of the event.
The Council may in its judgment refund a pro rota portion of the fee for
Ordinance No. 202
Page Nine
the unexpired period of the license, computed on a monthly basis,
when operation of the licensed business ceases not less than one
month before expiration of the license because of:
(1) destruction or damage of the licensed premises by fire
or other catastrophe.
(2) the licensee's illness.
(3) the licensee's death.
(4) a change in the legal status of the municipality making
it unlawful for a licensed business to continue.
Subd. 7. At the time of each original application for a license, or
application for change in ownership, except in the case of an "on sale
club" license, the applicant shall pay in full an Investigating fee. For
a single natural person, the investigating fee shall be $150.00. For a
partnership, the investigating fee shall be $150.00 for each partner. For
a corporation or other association, the investigating fee shall be $150.00
for each principal who owns 10%or more of said corporation or other associa-
tion but in no event less than$300.00. No investigating fee shall be refunded.
Subd. 8. At any time that an additional investigation is required
because of an enlargement, alteration, or extension of premises previously
licensed, the licensee shall pay an additional investigating fee in the
amount of $50.00.
Subd. 9. Where a new application is filed as a result of incorporation
by an existing licensee and the ownership control and interest in the
license are unchanged, no additional license fee will be required.
Section I-108. Investigation of Applications.
Subd. 1. All applications for a license shall be referred to the Public
Safety Director, and to such other Village Departments as the Village
Manager shall deem necessary, for verification and investigation of the
facts set forth in the application. The Public Safety Director shall cause
to be made such investigation of the information requested in Section 1-104,
Subdivision 3, as shall be necessary and shall make a written recommen-
dation and report to the Village Council. The Village Council may order
and conduct such additional investigation as it shall deem necessary.
Subd. 2. Upon receipt of the written report and recommendation by
the Public Safety Director and within twenty days thereafter, the Village
Council shall insttuct the Village Clerk to cause to be published in the
official newspaper ten days in advance, a notice of a hearing to be held
by the Village Council, setting forth the day, time and pleas when the
Ordinance No. 202
Page Ten
hearing will be held, the name of the applicant, the premises where
the business is to be conducted, the nature of the business and such
other information as the Village Council may direct. At the hearing,
opportunity shall be given to any person to be heard for or against the
granting of the license. A license, other than a renewal, shall not be
approved before the next regular meeting of the Village Council following
such hearing.
Section I-109. Persons Ineligible for License.
No license shall be granted to or held by any person:
Subd. 1. Under the age of majority.
Subd. 2. Who is not of good moral character.
Subd. 3. Who, if an individual, is an alien.
Subd. 4. Who has been convicted within 15 years prior to the appli-
cation for such license, of any violation of any law of the United States,
the State of Minnesota, or any other State or Territory, or of any local
ordinance regarding the manufacture, sale, distribution or possession for
sale or distribution of intoxicating liquor, or whose liquor license has
been revoked for any violation of any law or ordinance.
Subd. 5. Who is a manufacturer or wholesale-of intoxicating
liquor and no manufacturer or wholesaler shall either directly or indirectly
own or control or have any financial interest in any retail business
selling intoxicating liquor.
Subd. 6. Who is directly or indirectly interested in any other
establishment in the Village of Eden Prairie to which an On sale" license
has been issued under this ordinance.
Subd. 7. Who, if a corporation, does not have a manager who is
eligible pursuant to the provisions of this section.
Subd. 8. Who is the spouse of a person ineligible fore license
pursuant to the provisions of Subdivisions 4, 5, or 6 of this section or
who,in the judgment of the Village Council, is not the real party in
interest or beneficial owner of the business operated,or to be operated, .
under the license.
Ordinance No. 202
Page Eleven
Subd. 9. An "on sale" license will not be renewed if, in the case
of an individual, the licensee is not a resident of the Twin Cities
Metropolitan Area at the time of the date for renewal; if, in the case of
a partnership, the managing partner is not a resident of the Twin Cities
Metropolitan Area at the time of the renewal; or in the case of a
corporation, if the manager is not a resident of the Twin Cities Metro-
politan Area at the time of the date of renewal. The TWIN CITIES
METROPOLITAN AREA is defined as being comprised of the counties of
Anoka, Carver,Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott and Washington.
Subd. 10. No person shall own an interest in more than one establish-
ment or business within Eden Prairie for which an "on sale" license has
been granted. The term "interest" as used in this section includes any
pecuniary interest in the ownership, operation, management or profits of
a retail liquor establishment, but does not include bona fide loans;bona
fide fixed sum rental agreements; bona fide open accounts or other
obligations held with or without security arising out of the ordinary and
regular course of business of selling or leasing merchandise,fixtures
or supplies to such establishment; or an interest of 10 per cent or less in
any corporation holding a license. A person who receives moneys from
time to time directly or indirectly from a licensee, in the absence of a
bona fide consideration therefor and excluding bona fide gifts or donations,
shall be deemed to have a pecuniary interest in such retail license. In
determining "bond fide", the reasonable value of the goods or things
received as consideration for any payment by the licensee and all other
facts reasonably tending to prove or disprove the existence of any purpose-
ful scheme or arrangement to evade the prohibitions of this section shall
be considered.
Section I-110. Places Ineligible for License.
Subd. 1. No license shall be granted, or renewed, for operation on
any premises, on which taxes, assessments or other financial claims of
the Village or of the State are due, delinquent or unpaid. In the event an
action has been commenced pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 278,
Minnesota Statutes, questioning the amount or validity of taxes, the
Council may, on application by the licensee, waive strict compliance with
this provision;no waiver may be granted, however, for taxes or any
portion thereof,which remain unpaid for a period exceeding one year
after becoming due.
Ordinance No. 202
Page Twelve
Subd. 2. No license shall be issued for the premises owned by a
person to whom a license may not be granted under this ordinance,
except any owner who is a minor, alien, or a person who has been
convicted of a crime other than a violation of Minnesota Statutes, —
Sections 340,07 through 340.39.
Subd. 3. No "on sale" license shall be granted for a restaurant
that does not have a dining area open to the general public, with a total
minimum floor area of 1,800 square feet with a permanent seating capacity
for not less than 150 guests at one time, or for a hotel that does not have
a dining area, open to the general public, with a total minimum floor area
of 1,200 square feet with a permanent seating capacity for not less than
100 guests at one time.
Subd. 4. No license shall be granted for any place which has a
common entrance or exit between any two establishments except that a
public concourse or public lobby shall not be constructed as a common
entrance or exit.
Section I-111. Conditions of License.
Subd. 1. Every license shall be granted subject to the conditions
of the following subdivisions and all other subdivisions of this ordinance
and of any other applicable ordinance of the Village or State law.
Subd. 2, The license shall be posted in a conspicuous place in
the licensed establishment at all times.
Subd. 3, Any public safety officer, building inspector, or any
employee so designated by the Village Manager shall have the unqualified
right to enter, inspect, and search the premises of the licensee during
business hours without a warrant,
Subd. 4. Every licensee shall be responsible for the conduct of his
place of business and the conditions of sobriety and order in the place of
business and on the premises.
Subd- 5, No "on sale" licensees shall sell intoxicating liquor "off sale".
Subd- 6. No license shall be effective beyond the space named in the •
license for which it was granted.
Subd. 7. No intoxicating liquor shall be sold or furnished or delivered
to any intoxicated person, to any habitual drunkard, to any person under the
age of majority, or to any person to whom sale is prohibited by State law.
Ordinance No. 202
Page Thirteen
Subd. 8. No person under the age of majority shall be employed in
any rooms constituting the place in which intoxicating liquors are sold
at retail "on sale", except that persons under the ago of majority may be
employed to perform the duties of a busboy or dishwashing services in places defined as a restaurant or hotel or motel serving food in rooms in
which intoxicating liquors are sold at retail "on sale".
Subd. 9. No equipment or fixture in any licensed place shall be
owned in whole or in part by any manufacturer or distiller of intoxicating
liquor except such as shall be expressly permitted by State law.
Subd. 10. No licensee shall sell,offer for sale, or keep for sale,
intoxicating liquors from any original package which has been refilled or
partly refilled. No licensee shall directly or through any other person
dilute or in any manner tamper with the contents of any original package
so as to change its composition or alcoholic content while in the original
package. Possession on the premises by the licensee of any intoxicating
liquor in the original package differing in composition or alcoholic content
in the liquor when received from the manufacturer or wholesaler from whom
it was purchased, shall be prima facie evidence that the contents of the
original package have been diluted, changed or tampered with.
Subd. 11. No licensee shall apply for or possess a Federal Wholesale
Liquor Dealer's special tax stamp or a Federal gambling stamp.
Subd. 12. No licensee shall keep ethyl alcohol or neutral spirits
on his licensed premises or permit their use on the premises as a beverage
or mixed with a beverage.
Subd, 13. The business records of the licensee, including Federal
and State tax returns, shall be available for inspection by the Village
Manager, or other duly authorized representative of the Village at all
reasonable times.
Subd. 14. Changes in the corporate or association officers, corporate
charter, articles of incorporation, by—laws, or partnership agreement, as
the case may be, shall be submitted to the Village Clerk within 30 days
after such changes are made. In the case of a corporation, the licensee
shall notify the Village Clerk when a person not listed in the application
acquires an interest which, together with that of his spouse, parent,
brother, sister or child, exceeds 5%, and shall give all information about
y..
Ordinance No. 202
Page Fourteen
said person as is required of a person pursuant to the provisions of
Section I-104, Subdivision 3, of this ordinance.
Subd. 15. At the time a licensee submits his application for
renewal of a license, he shall state the nature and amount of any
contribution he has made in the preceding five years for state and
local campaign or political purposes, the person to whom the contri-
bution was made and the person or organization for whom intended.
Subd. 16. A licensed restaurant shall be conducted in such a manner
that the principal part of the business for a license year is the serving
of foods. A hotel shall be conducted in such a manner that, of that
part of the total business attributable to or derived from the serving of
foods and intoxicating liquors, the principal part of the business for a
license year is the serving of foods.
Subd. 17. No licensee shall keep, possess, or operate or permit
the keeping, possession, or operation of any gambling device or apparatus
on the licensed premises, and he shall not permit any gambling therein.
Subd. 18. No licensee shall knowingly permit the licensed premises
or any room in those premises or any adjoining building directly or
indirectly under his control to be used as a resort for prostitutes.
Subd. 19. No licensee shall discriminate in the opbration of licensed
premises or discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment
because of race, color, creed, national origin, or sex.
Section I-112. Hours of Operation.
No sale of intoxicating liquor shall be made after 1:00 a.m. on Sunday nor
until 8:00 a.m. on Monday nor between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.
on any Memorial Day, nor between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.
on any primary, special or general election of the Village of Eden Prairie.
No"on sale" shall be made between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m.
on any weekday. No consumption of intoxicating liquor shall occur on
the premises after 1:16 a.m. nor until 8:00 a.m. on the following business
day,
Section I-113. Clubs.
No club holding an "on sale club" license shall sell intoxicating liquor
•nooept to members end bona fide guests.
Ordinance No. 202
Page Fifteen
Section I-114. Restrictions on Purchase and Consumption.
Subd. 1. No person under the age of majority shall misrepresent
his age for the purpose of obtaining intoxicating liquor nor shall he enter
any premises licensed for the retail sale of intoxicating liquor for the
purpose of purchasing or having served or delivered to him for consuming
any such intoxicating liquor, nor shall any such person purchase,
attempt to purchase, consume, or have another person purchase for him
• any intoxicating liquor.
Subd. 2. No person under the age of majority shall receive delivery
of intoxicating liquor.
Subd. 3. No person shall induce a person under the age of majority
to purchase or procure or obtain intoxicating liquor.
Subd. 4. Any person who may appear to the licensee, his employees
or agents to be under the age of majority shall, upon demand of the
licensee, his employee or agent, produce an-parerit to be examined an
identification certificate issued by any clerk of the District Court in
the State of Minnesota pursuant to Section 626.31 1 through 626.319,
Minnesota Statutes.
Subd. 5. In every prosecution for a violation of the provisions of
this ordinance relating to the sale or furnishing of intoxicating liquor
to persons under the age of majority, and in every proceeding before
the Village Council with respect thereto, the fact that the minor involved
has obtained and presented to the licensee, his employee or agent,(a
verified identification card(issued by the Clerk of any District Court in
the State of Minnesota from which it appears that said person was 21
years of age and was regularly issued such identification card, shall be
prima facie evidence that the licensee, his agent or employee is not
guilty of a violation of such a provision and shall be conclusive evidence
that a violation, if one has occurred, was not willful or intentional.
Subd. 6. Any person who may appear to the licensee, his employee
or agent to be under the age of majority and who does not have in his
possession any identification certificate as above described, may sign
and execute a statement in writing as follows;
•
Ordinance No. 202
Page Sixteen •
READ CAREFULLY BEFORE SIGNING
The following are excerpts from the laws of the State of Minnesota,
Section 340.731 Minnesota Statutes, Minors, Forbidden Acts or
Staternerts:
•
"It shall be unlawful for:
Any person to misrepresent or misstate his or her age, or
the age of any other person for the purpose of inducing any
licensee, or any employee of any licensee, or any employee
of any municipal liquor store, to sell, serve, or deliver
any alcoholic beverage to a minor;
A Minor to have in his possession any intoxicating liquor
with intent to consume same at a place other than the
household of his parent or guardian."
VIOLATION OF THE ABOVE MINNESOTA LAW IS A MISDEMEANOR
PUNISHABLE BY A FINE OF$300.00 OR A 90-DAY IMPRISONMENT
OR BOTH.
My age is Date of Birth Place of
Birth My address is
Dated:
Type of Identification
Witness
Signed
The above form shall be fumished at the expense of all licensees desiring
•to use the same and when properly executed may be considered as evidence
in arty prosecution and by the Village Council in any proceeding before
the Council or a committee thereof relating to the business or operations of
the licensee. Such forms after execution shall be kept on file by the
licensee for a period of one year.
Subd. 7. No person shall give, sell, procure or purchase intoxicating
liquor to or for any person to whom the sale of intoxicating liquor is
forbidden by law.
• Subd. S. No intoxicating liquor shall be consumed on a public
highway or in an automobile.
Ordinance No. 202
Page Seventeen
Section I-115. Liability Insurance.
Subd. 1. Insurance Required. At the time of filing an application
for either an "on sale" or an "on sale club" liquor license, the applicant
shall file with the Village Clerk a liability insurance policy which shall
be subject to the approval of the Village Council. The insurer on such
liability insurance policy shall be duly licensed to do business in the
State of Minnesota, and the insurance policy shall be approved as to
form and execution by the Village Attorney. Such liability insurance
policy shall be in the amount of not less than$10,000 coverage for one
person and $2 0,000 coverage for more than one person, and shall
specifically provide for the payment by the insurance company on behalf
of the insured of all sums which the insured shall become obliged to pay
by reason of liability imposed upon him by law for injuries or damages
to persons other than employees, including the liability imposed upon
the insured by reason of Section 340.95, Minnesota Statutes. Such
liability insurance policy shall further provide that no cancellation for
any cause can be made either by the insured or the insurance company
without first giving 10 day's notice to the Village in writing of intention
to cancel the same, addressed to the Village Clerk. Further, it shall
provide that no payment of any claim by the insurance company shall,
in any manner,decrease the coverage provided for in respect to any
other claim or claims brought against the insured or company thereafter.
Such policy shall be conditioned that the insurer shall pay, to the extent
of the principal amount of the policy, any damages for death or injury
caused by, or resulting from the violation of any law relating to the
business for which such license has been granted. The licensee and
the Village shall be named as joint insureds on the liability insurance
policy.
Section I-116. Revocation.
Subd. 1. The Village Council may suspend or revoke any intoxicating
liquor license for the violation of any provision or condition of this
ordinance or of any State law or Federal law regulating the sale of intoxi-
cating liquor, and shall revoke such license for any willful violation which,
under the laws of the State, is grounds for mandatory revocation, and
shall revoke for failure to keep the insurance required by Section I-115 in
full force and effect.
Except in the case of a suspension pending a hearing on revocation,
nonmandatory revocation or suspension by the Council shall be preceded
by written notice to the licensee and a public hearing. The notice shall
give at least ten day's notice of the time and place of the hearing and
.
Ordinance No. 202
Page Eighteen
shall state the nature of the charges against the licen see. The
Council may, without any notice, suspend any license pending a
hearing on revocation for a period not exceeding 30 days. The
notice may be served upon the licensee personally or by leaving the
same at the licensed premises with the person in charge thereof.
No suspension after public hearing shall exceed 60 days.
Section I-117. Penalties.
Any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished
by a fine of not more than Three Hundred ($300.00)Dollars and
imprisonment for not more than 90 days.
First read at a regular meeting of the Council of the Village of
Eden Prairie this and finally read,
adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the Council
of said Village on the
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor of the
Village of Eden Prairie
ATTEST:
SEAL
Edna M. Holmgren
Village Clerk
...._________
- 0 CORRIDOR
18,,,,,169. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._ .
...........0 •
COMMITTEE
li_ .
TO WON IT MAY CONCERN
500 West 98th Street The prime goal of the "18-169 Corridor Committee" is to assist
Bloomington, Minn.
Tel. 888-8818 in the development of a transportation network for the entire
STEERING
COMMITTEE fast growing Southwestern portico of the metropolitan area.
Walt Harbeck, Chrmn This goal includes the development of a transportation network
Shakopee
Joe Rimaac, Secy. which will provide safe and convenient access to and between
Burnsville
Otto Bang points within Hennepin, Scott and Dakota counties; to the re-
Edina
Al Hall winder of the Twin Cities area, to southern and southwestern
Burnsville
Bill Pearson Minnesota, while also eliminating the adverse effects of
Prior Lake
Norman Bareness regional transportation facilities which pass through the area.
Prior Lake
Myron Richards
Savage
Len Shafer Immediately, the tomsittee is concentrating oe the achievement
Savage
Jim Frady •f a toll bridge strobe the Minnesota liver it County Road 18.
Shakopee
Fay Pope ,, prime goal demands A high bridge connecting county road 18, ,
Burnsville
Joe Reis ighway 101 and interstate 494, crossing over the Minnesota
Shakopee
Ray Foslid ' ver. The pupae is for traffic relief, industrial develop-
Shakopee
Ery Prenevost at, and oceanic savings to industry and the general public.
Shakopee
Harry Coult
Eden Prairie
Ray O'Neil
Shakopee
Leo Sailer
M.N.&S. `/
Pat Colbert, Jr. Signed .�Ad// 'j -/rc
Bloomington Walter Barbeck Y j,�a,yam �111 •
Sen. John Metcalf Chairmen • Eden Blopm.
Shakopee Prairie ington
n.ti.,. ..e1w
. .'
,
\,7 G' Li14 ,
^�_,�� , Y 1 „` marcel jouseato
t-"� J��.�� Li L
Mite 201 roseville professional confer
2223 north hamline avenue roseville , minnesoto
85113 phone 612 /636-4900 -
March 12, 1973
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Dick Putnam, Planner
Village of Eden Prairie
FROM: Marcel Jouseau
RE: Eden Farms Phase I -
Erosion and Sedimentation Control
In order to minimize the impact of the development of Eden Farms
Phase I on the immediate surroundings and on the Riley-Purgatory
Creek watershed as a whole , we propose that the development of
Phase I proceed in the order and manner descri bed below.
It should be understood that a more precise description of the
responsibilities of the various contractors, of the manners in
which they are to proceed and of the techniques and means to be
utilized to achieve erosion and sedimentation control will be
written in the specifications. These specifications will be
submitted to the Engineer representing the Riley-Purgatory Creek
watershed for his approval prior to the beginning of construction.
Disturbance of the environment, though minimum will arise from:
- Construction of utilities
• - Grading of cul-de-sac
- Construction of houses
A. Construction of Storm Sewer and Sanitary Sewer (End of Cul-
de-Sac to Fl ood Plain)
Construction of the sewer facilities will start from the
Creek and proceed upward. A temporary settling pond to
retain the soil particles wi11 be required at the bottom
•
•
planning engineering transportation
Page 2
of the slope during construction of the sewer facilities.
The storm and sanitary sewer pipes will be placed within
the same trench to minimize the clear cutting of trees and
removal of ground cover.
The opening up of the trench, construction of utilities,
backfil1i ng of the trench, and establ i shment of the ground
cover will be completed within one week.
Water from the storm sewer, before reaching the Creek, will
be handled in a way that will reduce the velocity of its
flow and so prevent the scouring of the banks and bed of
the Creek.
The slope which has been exposed during construction work
will be broken into short segments 25 to 50 feet in length
(to be de termi ned by the Engineer). Dams across the
trench wi 11 be bui 1 t to retain the soil above them.
B. Construction of the Cul-de-Sac
A temporary settling pond at the end of the cul-de-sac, to
retain sediments and prevent them from entering the storm •
sewer system, will be built before work on the grading of
the cul-de-sac begins.
Removal of the vegetation will be permitted only within
the area to be graded as shown on a plan developed by a
Landscape Archi tect.
The extent of the grading will be limited to the width of
the road bed plus the width of side s lopes necessary to
provide stable slopes.
The utilities will be laid down as soon as the work neces-
sary to rough grade the road is compl eted. The final
grading of side slopes is to be compl eted at the same time
that the road is graded. Permanent or temporary stablization
of the side slopes is to be achieved immediately. Stabili-
zation of the slopes will be done in accordance with a plan
developed by a Landscape Architect and approved by the
Engineer representing the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed
District.
The surfacing of the cul-de-sac will be done in accordance
with the Village requirements.
Page 3
•
When all the work has been completed and all bare areas
have been permanently stabilized, the temporary settling
ponds will be removed and the areas will be stabilized. _
C. Timing of Development
It is proposed that the development proceeds in the following
order:
1. Construction of a temporary settling pond at the •
end of the cul-de-sac prior to beginning on the
grading of the street, to retain soil particles
before they go down to the Creek,
2. Construction of storm sewer and sanitary sewer
upward from the flood plain.
3. Grading of the cul-de-sac bed and side slopes
and stabilization of the slopes .
4. Construction of utilities (water, sanitary sewer,
electricity, etc.)
5. Surfacing of cul-de-sac.
MJ:cs
P
TO: Village Council
DATE: March 13, 1973
SU3JECT: Eden Faros by Shelter Corporation
FROM: Dick Putnam
THROUGH: Robert Heinrich
The Park and Recreation Commission asked that I list the
various consultants and agencies which have reviewed the
Eden farms proposal. I also will indicate their recommendation
as to positive or negative.
BATHER,RIHGROSE,tiOLSFELD, IIIC.
Consultant site planners, engi neers advised Shelter Homes to
develop the site as per the submitted plan.
MARCELL, JOUSEAU, B.R.U., INC.
Consultant planner who reviewed the proposal in two letters -
March 2, 1973 and March 12, 1973. Recommend Positive for
proposal. •
EDEN PRAIRIE RESIDENTS IN DUCK LANE/ROUND LAKE AREA
Oecember 18, 1972 the Eden Farms project plus sector planning
and Hidden Ponds were discussed with about 40-6D residents
at the Prairie View School with Planning ConmissionChairwoman
Shelter, BIC!, and 11r. Donald Rippel Planning Consultant and the
Village P1anuer, No recommendation only information presented.
EDEN PRAIRIE PARK & RECREATION COIMMISSION
ReVi ewed the proposal for Eden Farm at 3 separate meetings. March
12, 1973 was the most recent. January 8, 1973 and January 22 with
Fir. Uani 1 uk present. Recommend strong support for Eden Farms projcet.
EDEN PRAIRIE PARK & RECREATION DIRECTOR
Reviewed the project and in January 23, 1973 report. Recommends
Approval.
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
Reviewed the project and strongly endorses the P.U.D. conc„pt, plan
and rezoning.
w
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNER
Reviewed projected with residents on 4 separate occasions and with
the other advisory agencies and commission Recommends strong Approval.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT DF AGRICULTURE - SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
Mr. Pat Kennedy and Robert Loth
Reviewed the Eden Farms proposal and discussed the development methods, etc.
with the Village Planner and G.R.W. Recommendations in letter February
22, 1973. Are favorable if proper erosion control and proper siti ng
is used.
RILEY-PURGATORY CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT - BOARD OF MANAGERS
Reviewed proposals for Eden Farms and strongly endorse proposal.
Letters of January 3 and January 18, 1973.
BARR ENGINEERING - WATERSHED ENGINEERS
Reviewed the P.U.D. and rezoning proposals and strongly support project.
Will require detailed engineering for sediment carted on akx places
near creek.
HENNEPIN COUNTY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION
Cheif Samuel Fisher
Reviewed P.U.D. Plan and preliminary plat for model home area and
recommends relocation of buck Lake Trail as presenting no problem.
Letter of January 22, 1973.
IIERBERT KLOSSNER - COUNTY ENGINEER
Reviewed the Eden Farms proposal and recommend approval based upon
their 6 recommendations. Letter of February 1, 1973
EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL
Reviewed all previous reports and approved P.U.D. concept plan
and first reading on model area rezoning.
ANDREU DAN I LUK- RESIDENT EDEN VIEW AREA
Reviewed the project and recommend disapproval based upon letters
and petitions of (larch 8, 1973 and January 9, 1973.
TO: Mayor and Members pf the Village Council
FROM: Village Manager
DATE: March 13, 1973
SUBJECT: Economic Considera.tion of Eden Farms
Among the several questions about the Eden Farms development raised
by Mr. Daniluk, a resident of the area, is the following concerning
economic effect:
"llas a study been done of the total economic effect of
this development upon the coumunity in terms of services
required, increased or decreased taxes, etc? Have all
costs and benefits been weighed? If so, what is the
economic impact upon the community?"
CONSIDERATIONS:
1. Open Space - It is very difficult to place a value on public
open space. It seems reasonable to assume that the approximately
65 acres of public and quasi public open space provided in this
development would cost in the range of $200,000 to $250,000 to
acquire at 1973 land prices.
2. The streets or"driveways" serving the clusters and townhouses will
remain as private ways maintained by the homeowners association
minimizing future snow removal and street maintenance costs.
3. Recreation and open space facilities to serve the population of
the proposed development will be provided by the development and
maintained by the homeowners association.
If. State collected locally .hared taxes as well an federal revenue
sharing are tied to population and per capita distribution.
The population added to the community by Eden Farms will increase
Eden Prairie's share of these revenues.
y. ''ypicaly, single-family homes in suburban locations will generate
.1i3 public school students while apartments will contribute .11.
A t theue rates one student is enrolled for each 9.5 to 10
r.nertment units, compared to one school-age child for each 2.0 to
2.5 single-family houses. Eden Farms projects 1.2 school-age children
per cluster single-family unit and .5 school-age children per town-
house unit. Projections which I personally view as on the high side.
P w
-2-
The cost of educating a child is often 30 to 40 per cent higher than
the taxes collected from the residential patrons depending, of
course, on the value of the taxed unit. In single-family residences
• the breakdown is probably where the market value is above$35,000.
The housing units in Eden Farms will range in cost from$30,000
to 02,000. Sufficient revenues should be generated from the
development to pay for the cost of educating the children living
in the development as well as pay for the other required local
government services.
Alternative residential land uses which would minimize local government
costs and maximize tax revenues could be either high density apartments
or very expensive single-family homes or large lots in the $70,0004100,000
bracket. Aside from the marketability of these types of housing, I am
not sure these alternatives at this location would be consistent with the
goals and objectives of the community.
It must be emphasized that the fundamental requisite of development policy
does not flow from tax data and can be derived only by definition of goals
and objectives which reflect the aspirations of our community.
EMI/sr
`.4.
r' r
marcel iouseaa,
0
suit, lot roseville professional center
2233 north homline avenue roseville , minnesota
35113 phone 612/636-4900
March 2, 1973
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Dick Putnam, Planner
Vill age of Eden Prairie
FROM: Marcel Jou seau, Associate AI P
RE: Review of the impact of soi 1 s on the development
of Eden Farms and the impact of Eden Farms on the
hydro logy of Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed
At your request, we have revi ewed the impact of soil s on the proposed
project and the i mpact of the project on the hydrology of the water—
shed.
The following comments are offered to you for your consideration.
SOIL CONSTRAIlITS Oil THE DEVELOPMENT OF EDEN FARMS
Existing soils on the site may impose several constraints on the
development of Eden Farms. These constraints are generally of two
types :
1. Poor drainago and seasonally high water table
of the Oundas, Cordova, and Hamel soil series
2. High e rodi bi 1 ity potential of the Hayden,
Burns v ille, Erin, soil series and Heyder and
Kingsley soil complexes
A third constrai n t is imposed by the mere geographic location of the
soils that are wi thin the flood plain.
Pi
planning engineering transportation
Page 2
1. Poor Drainage and Seasonally High Water Table
Small pockets of soils with a seasonally high water table can
be found within the site just south and adjacent to the flood
plain of Purgatory Creek as well as in the southwestern corner
of the site, close to Duck Trail (see Map). These soils belong
to the Cordova, Dundas and Hamel series. The water table may
be one to three feet below the surface for up to 90 days.
The Cordova, Dundas and Hamel soi is that can be found within
these poorly drained pockets are classed by USDA Soil Conser-
vation Service in Building Site Groups 10 and 11. Soils
included in Building Site Groups 10 and 11 are characterized
by having moderate to severe limitations for residential devel-
opment as a result of high seasonal water table and the effect
on foundations of both buildings and roads. However, except
for these soils within the flood plain and soils considered as
Peat and muck, soils within the site are expected to have both
adequate bearing capacity and stability for the type of devel-
opment proposed. Before final design stage, soil borings will
have to be taken to ascertain the extent of the problem and the
boundary of these poorly drained pockets.
Several solutions are available to avoid the problems created.
by these soils:
• a. Site planning: the ciusteri ng of buildings to avoid
any of these poorly drained soil pockets; these soils
being incorporated in the general open space plan for
the site. This solution is available at the design
stage.
b. Tiling around foundation foo tings.
c. Foundations built above wate r line.
d. Streets and driveways must b e carefully designed to
avoid heaving.
2. Erodible Soils
Soils of the Hayden, Erin and Burnsville series as well as those
of the Heyder and Kingsley comps exes generally have a low to
medium organic matter content. Consequently, these soils when
occurring on steep slopes have a high erodibility potential.
Topsoil must be safeguarded to facilitate the establishment of
the vegetative cover.
Page 3
Large areas of occurrence of the Erin series and ileyder soil
complex within the site are heavily wooded and, as indicated
in the general concept plan, are included in the open space
system or set aside for large-lot development. Considerable
precautions in order to minimize the removal of the existing
tree cover wi 11 be taken. Several methods of controlling
erosion and the sedimentation of soil particles in the Creek
will be uti 1 ized separately or in comb inati on. Some of these
methods are:
- construction of temporary sett ling basins at
the outlet of each sub-drainage area. These
basins would trap the sediments and prevent
them from eroding the drainage-ways .
- incremental development that will minimize
the period of exposure of bare soils to the
elements.
- quick stablization of slopes by means of
temporary cover and permanent vegetation.
- storm drainage will allow for the retrieval
of sediments and other matters .
Finally, site planning at the detailed scale offers other solu-
tions. The clustering of the housing units will be an asset in
maintai ning as much as possible land with an undisturbed vegeta-
tive cover and architectural solutions maki ng use of the natural
topography should prevent unnecessary distu rbance of the exist-
ing cover.
3. liaterl ogged Soil s
these soils include the wetland areas and the peat and muck
soils. These so i 1 s for the most part are covered with trees and
are to be maintai ned in their natural state, as open space.
Conclusion -
The constraints imposed by the soils withi n the site are not gener-
ally great but must be recognized.
The developer in its Development Concept Plan begins to address him-
self to some of the problems created by the soils -- inclusion of
flood plain, steep slopes, wooded areas, into the open space system.
•
•
Page 4
Further, the proposed clustering of the housing units will allow
for more flexibility in siting the buildi ngs to avoid problem areas.
In such a plan there is more "built—in" flexibility than in a
conventional subdivision.
The proposal is still at a concept level. At the design level of
each individual phase the developer hopes to demonstrate acute
sensitivity for the site with all i is potential and constraints.
It is anti cipated that a sediment control plan will be developed
in conjunction with the design of e ach phase. Such plan will then
be reviewed by the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District prior
to submission of the detai led site plan for the approval by the
Village Council .
IMPACT OF EDEN FARMS ON THE HYDROLOGY OF RILEY-PURGATORY CREEK
WATER SEED
•
The Village of Eden Prairie, as mos t of the southwest of the Metro-
poll tan Region, is considered as en aquifer recharge area. Several
geologic formations, whose quality as aquifer vary greatly, underlie
the Village.
The top formation is generally a gl acial drift from which most
private wells draw their water. Small to moderate quantities of
water are avail able from sand and gravel lenses interspersed within
the formation. As the metropolitan area develops the reliance on
shall ow wells in the glacial drift will not be possible.
Underlying the glacial dri ft is the Shakopee-Oneta Formation. This
is a very important aquifer from which large quantities of water
are available.
Beneath the Shakopee-Oneta Formati o n 1 ie the Jordan Sandstone, a
very important aquifer, and the St. Lawrence Formation, which is
prii.iarily a shale from which little quantities of water, if any,
are a vailaHe.
It should be noted that not alI the formations are present at all
locations vaithi n the Vi ll age.
It i s true that generally urbanization, because it reduces seepage
of water through the soils and grea ter quantities of water are being
withdrawn, results in a lowering of the water table. The urbani za-
tion of Eden Prairie and of Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed will
tend to increase run-off and decrease groundwater levels.
Page 5
The proposed development of Eden Farms at a density of 2.65 dwelling
units per acre is expected to result in the coverage of 23% of the
site with impervious material (asphalt, concrete, rooftops, etc.).
This i ncludes the eight acres of the service center. As a comparison
the subdivision immediately to the east of Eden Farms, built at an
approximate density of 2.1 dwelling units per acre, resulted in
about 26% of the site being covered with impervious material. It
i s, therefore, clear that percentage of coverage with impervious
rnateri al is not directly related to dens i ty of development. There-
fore, it should he clear that coverage of the land with impervious
materi al and not density is the important factor in discussing water
run-off.
It cannot be denied that Eden Farms will increase the run-off on
the si te. However, it should be noted that the increase in the
rate of run-off, will be not more than the rate of increase created
by any other subdivision in the Village. The lower percentage of
impervious surface of Eden Farms should actually result in less run-
off than on other subdivisions.
The pl an for the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed took into account
a cove rage with impervious surface of 30% for areas to be developed
for si ngle-family residences.
The concept plan for Eden Farms indicates that the 100-year flood'
plain, the steep slopes and wooded areas are to remain undeveloped
thus allowing for water seepage through the ground.
Further, the plan for Eden Farms indicates that a settling pond
within the flood plain and another pond on the upland will collect
the run-off from the site. These ponds will allow not only the
retrieval of sediments and nutrients present in the run-off but also
the seepage of water to the ground and the aquifer and the use by wild-
life. The impondment of the run-off will also allow for gradual
release of water to the Creek and, there fore, will not contribute
to the flooding of the Creek. It i s expected that whatever run-off
takes place on the site will remain on the site contrary to most
subdi visions where run-off is disch arged into the municipal system
and may or may not be available for aquifer recharge.
Conclusion :
The urbanization of Eden Prairie and of the Riley-Purgatory Creek
Watershed is likely to result in a lowering of the water table in
the area. Consequently, some shallow wells withdrawing water from
sand and gravel pockets exi sting i n the glacial draft may become
dry. However, this will not be the result of a single residential
development.
• Page 6
Urbanization generally results in an increase in run-off. The per-
centage of coverage of the land with impervious material is the
main factor in creating run-off. The impact of run-off on both the t-
quantity and qual ity of water available for the recharge of the
aquifer can be minimized. The development of Eden Farms will leave
77% of the land open to allow for seepage to the ground and will
maintain the flood plain. Two impondments for the retrieval of
sediments and nutrients and the recharge of the aquifer will be
created.
The gradual release of run-off water from the site to Purgatory
Creek should prevent any negative effect of Eden Farms on the Creek
at times of floods.
MJ:cs
TO: Robert P. Heinrich, Village Manager
FROM: John D. Franc, Finance Director
DATE: March 9, 1973
RE: Resolution No. 659. A Resolution in Regard to PERA Benefits
1. The interest assumption: The interest to be used by the actuaries
should always be the "actual" rate of interest not a fictitious amount.
2. Retirement based on career average versus the highest five years: Because
of the great difference in salaries paid in the 1940's and 5O's to those
paid in the 1970's and thereafter employees, under present regulations,
retire with monthly pensions far below the amount necessary for support.
A 5 year average would provide a reasonable retirement plan. Monthly
pensions, under the present plan, of $100 to $150 per month are not
uncommon.
3. Survivor benefits: Village employees are either in the Basic plan or the
Coordinated plan. If they are in the Coordinated plan survivor benefits
come from Social Security; if they are in the Basic plan these benefits
come from the PERA Basic Find_ The maximum benefit under the PERA Basic
Fund plan is $250 per month; under Social Security it is about$500 per
month.
4. Interest paid when a member receives a refund: It appears to be reasonable
and fair to pay interest on money the PERA Fund has had on deposit.
The question should be asked: What impact will this have on the Village's
cost for PERA? Four of the present twenty four employees covered under PERA
are in the Basic plan. All new employees will probably be in the Coordinated
(Social Security and PERA plan). The cost of' these changes falls quite
heavily to the Basic plan and therefore the cost to the Village will be
slight.
VILLAGE OF MOEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 659
A RESOLUTION IN REGARD TO PERA
BENEFITS
WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Village Council feels that it has
become increasingly evident that current benefits under PERA are grossly
inadequate to provide for dedicated public servants after their reitre-
ment, or for protection for their survivors:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that we, the Village Council respect-
fully ask the 1973 Minnesota Legislature to improve the PERA law by making
the following changes;
1. Change the interest assumption which the actuary is required to
use from 34% to a figure which will appropriately reflect
current potential earnings of the Amd, for example, 5%;
2. Change the definition of average salary from the current "career
average" concept to en average of the five highest years;
3. Remove the limitation on survivor benefits the
basic biceplan to
reflect the fact that members now pay r
on
total salary;
4. Allow a reasonable payment of interest for the use of the member's
money when a member receives a refund of his or her contributions
due to termination of service prior to retirement.
ADOPTED by the Village Council of the Village of Eden Prairie on
day of , 1973.
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk
•
•
�rl'Li,1 is OF l OEi; IT,A:f.12I:A
Hisl;';i;r'.Tl% Coilhi'Y, I•'.Licm*t':OTA
12Ii":1011,UTIOld :0.
A 111:30Id;i]Olti 1ii20In:D EDl id PRAIRIE
LrIP,I,TORS TO OPPOSE RltihNAtE FILL
110, 4.10 A'WOLI+11f1IiG OF TOil TOWNSHIP
SY3'.Cr:.. OP RELIEF 1iJ IIc;17IIPIh` COURTY
',- 1;11ER:'.3, Chore has been introdncn;l in the 1973 Session of' the
State Le3isl.at:ure, Senate File No. 1110 which proposed that the town
system for caring for the poor in the County of Hennepin be abolished,
end,
WHEREAS, such bill. would case the cost of the Villcz e for such
relief to increase placiii,; an additional tax burden upon car citizens,
eel
bibEREdS, such a law -would remove any Village control of the
aulcinisirat:i.ou of.the welfare program, thereby preventing direct control
of expend 1;ures, and
WHEIP;A.3, the Village feels that it is capable of continuing to
1erfarm thin service for the citizens of Eder; Prairie in an adequate
acaauer keeping the cost to the local taxpayer at a minimum, therefore
BE 1'1 1,,11.Olyi'i9 by tlra Village Coueai.l of the Village of ilden Prairie
t et the Viliege hereby goes on record an c;rr,eing this bill ad ur;^s
+.tr represent:,.-liven to take 1111 steps po:-rible to prevent this additional
lwrden from being added to the Village ta?peyers, and
• 1G', :LT I'U121;1ER 11E30L}';D that the Village Clerk in hereby author'i'c d
di.;;%ctocl to irros,ate the Vi.Elr. ;r•' ro.1,e,r and. L•„isl.ator 'with a
c.'alI ca. eel;' (•i ib.in r;:: i Itiram in Lieui poa:itice ai' i'cc VI.lm_m„:
or,thin tre::;:cr.
1
flOFIJ ID by the V,ia -;c Council no 1
Paul. ii. nap ath,hayor
0l;'1':
SEAL
}'Ilia b. Imolmvxon, Clerk
11 /
C-
Suburban E r1:epin County
Relici' Iiseal - Aa aril. l oti.r(
A'nrch 1, 1973
[. C1u in...an Kenneth iurnl aen called the r.,ectirt. to order.
TI. Joseph Ve say, Secy. Trcac. real t}vs minute; of 11972 annual nee t:i.nq.
Alsoroved as road. _
I--
TILT. Presentation of Reports.:
1. Co'n;r"r:i ivc_1_e.Li e I' Cost: for-72
Mrs. Lior1,e ger reviewed relief cosi:a, stated that there would be
no chap;ec; in mininetrat.ive charges _in 1973.
2. Status of Let;tslatioa Concerning Abol.iolanenl; of Townsh n System
of Relief in Iicnnen.in Count',L.
Joseph Vesely reviewed the status of legislation to abolish township
relief sya tem. lie stated that the 1,111 that is in coaL:aitte now •.:ould
abolish than township :system all over the state and place on a county
basis. He reported that there vas a lawsuit started by Minneapolis
al;ainst Hennepin County that is pending in the Supreme Court. The
law now provides the county chase a city's relief costs if leas than
65% of the country's tr a base is within the city Limits, etc. (see
attached February 28th Tribune arLicl_e), lie then reviewed the follow-
lag brtalcclon of relief costs in Hennepin County and L:.inneapol.:i.s in
1972 as to costs for each under rending legislation if passed.
North Rural Iicnnep.rn $ 68,796.22
Sub. Hennepin CLy. Relief Board 1147,27C.57
Bloom;.nston 6 f.359.26.
5
fi 272,919.05
Iiinvwo 011a 3,921.0'i4.36
$ 11-:193.9 41.
Estima.tul Ta.: Base:
1iiniie polls 44, Suburban hence_ .yin Co:taly 5u„
1109 3,933.}o1.
2,11:V',;r10.37 Sul erbc n Ilannapi.n Cettta
],7G1,1i7i.0•,a I:inry!pAin
Mr. Vesely wain i_d 14.5 to 5 toilla o.cblition,.;1 for suburban liennep:i.a
County.'tC Trill fuvesse.
Representthie .loin Keefe reviewed status of bill, is in Health and
Welfare Committees now, said we need art msende'cnt to Ha' bill because
he's quite ieee the brill wi1I. pass as is. I;.irmcol•ol.i.s has edoptcd
1.11 : ILILi, feels they rust cell this rtet-el ore:,z but is not an car;:'
i.crr.a:. lira nrga1 everybody to contact their respre satanic with their
wishes.
The Knickes.boeker Amendment (to seclude t'inneapolie end Suburban
liennepiu C'otmty) will be presented at an 8 a.m., Tuesday March 6th
meeting at the Capitol. Representative Keickerboeher reported that
l
Relief Board - Anneal :rc:t1.1,r,
Lurch 1, 1973
Page J'rO
these was nolb l.r . .a (:he House so far. Joan Grove stated thee it
had not beer :in.`.rohic d in the Semite.
Pr. Vesely then Tevicr:ed the Pedera i law that ',i.ill.bec�:ace effective
Jvituary l., 1.971E That odmi.ristrativc cost:: will be paid by the Peds.
If struiderds axes levier than fed standards,will Imrae to be equalized.
Pr. Verley was nas1eit how much this night increase costs and he replied
101, at the very moat hut likely much less. Pe said the heda also went
to consolidate caverhead for cat S(;oiioail. Ride, blind, aged, disabled, etc.
If we lose in the House he suggested that an amc nhent be introduced
on a Use Basis in the Senate - like the General Hospital statute.
There being no further discussion, a motion was made and seconded
to oppose Senate Pile $910, abolishing township system relief.
It was moved end seconded to order the staff to call each con aunity
urging then to present. a resolution to their cm veils for adoption
and either send or take to the F a. m. meeting at the Capitol on
next Tuesday.
fV. Administrative Problems
rf moron aer„er reported that it had been the smoothest running year
they've ever had -no problems.
V. ltaectien of Officers
ter. Tumnhon reviewed offices that are open; Vice Chairman and Two
1•i.;mbere at Large.
Helen Penniman wits nominated for Vice Chcirm.n, no eP,.er nominations -
closed.
It was moved and seconded to appoint Helen Pean.inan as Vice Chairman
I:u;cite Jacobsen and Pod S,rnsn t noa•:innied for Berl ,ra ;,t h•Jrg . P:o
other norinx i.o:_a, Glored.
'it was moved n_ui seconded to ac,potut Jacobean rind Swanson for Perrbers
eL Largo.
1•,cetin; mi,jre.rn.
No te:
I talked to Representative Knickerbocher after the meeting - he feels
the bill will poses as is but hopes to get. the "Use Basis" amendment
adopted.
i{11
SU„u }3A;i 1L4:fN PIN COUNTY RELIE.? BOARD
ANNUAL MEETING
March 8, 1973
is
AGENDA
I. Call to Order
II. 'haling of Dinutes
III. Presentation of Reports
1 Comparative relief costs 1971 — 1972
2; Status of legislation concerning abolishment of
township system of relief in Hennepin County
IV. Administrative Problems
V. Election of Officers
Board He gibers:
Chairman! Mr. Kenneth Turnhaa
*Vice Chairman: Mrs. Helen Penniman
Secretary-Treasurer: Mr. Joseph C. Vesely
*Members at Iarge: Mr. Eugene Jacobsen
Mr. Roy E. Sue-nson
Election to these positions only this year.
VI. adjournment
ti
SUBURBAN HE!S EPI:I COUNTRY RELI • BOARD
COIMPP.RATTIE RELIEF COSTS
1971 1972
- REL F 110. RELIEF NO.0.r.
71
IZLI.AGE COSTS ADMIN. TOTAL COSTSCOSTS ADMIN. TOTAL CASES
BROOKLYN CENTER 15,191.08 6,047.26 21,238..34 139 12,240.94 7,603.95 19,844.89 163
DE.EPHAVEN 597.38 628.14 1,225.52 12 1,015.00 730.36 1,745.36 13
EDEN F.RAIRM 1.647.84 1,466.11 3.113 95 32 915.05 803.01 1,718.06 1,5
MINA 3,904.71 2,258.17 6,162.88 52 5,549.54 2,899.28 8,448.82 64
ISIaR 3,201.09 1,073.30 4,274.39 25 524.96 809.43 1,334.39 16
Gorr : VALLEY 5.621.96 2,114.65 7,736.61 47 4,235.40 2,4.18.55 6,653.95 50
cr r.r000 32.89 240.00 272.89 - 1.50 396.18 397.68 3 ,
IIOPRTiMS 10,202.32 5,927.11 16,129.43 131 10,545.13 5,911.17 16,456.30 125
TNO EtTDT CE 35.31 274,09 309.40 2 5.79 356.97 362.76 1
LONG T.A0:E 802.41 542.83 1,345.24 10 230.32 352.52 582.84 1
MAPLE 0'1AIN 239.77 274.56 514.33 2 81.70 400.59 482.29 2
':�z,i. 778.75 471.24 1,249.99 9 60.94 358•e8 419.02 2
;71n; Tc'TA 9,393.73 5,610.99 15,004.72 120 9,740.20 5,135.29 14,855.49 111
1-0N} RTSTA cr. 152.31 560.81 408.501 11 214.21 408.16 622.37 3
:'..'I:D 6.467.29 3,436,5C 9,903.79 77 5,213.41 3,732.01 8,945.42 84
,-;),0 2,746.93 2,101.53 4.R 8.46 46 1,535,50 1,376.79 2,912.29 30
'ICHEIT,171) 10,009.67 5,852.82 15,862.49 133 12,308.80 7,515.29 19,824.09 167
ANTHONY 2,360.52 1,2.47.71 3,608.23 25 1,221.68 81.8.54 2.040.22 15
si. LOUIS PARK 17.875.07 9.839.51 27,714.58 224 23,266.78 11,771.79 35,038.57 255
C?for.,•,;.CID 749.23 543.34 1.292.57 11 347.46 654..06 1,001.52 13
SPi(DG rAUC 856.43 479,33 1,335.76 9 990.69 939.86 1,930.55 20
1'AYZATA 876,466 429.9; 1.306.41 7 681.91 971.78 1.653.69 19
93.438.53, 51,419.95 1.44,858.48 1124 90,926.91 56,343.66 141.270.57 1172
Total r-iribnrsements for 1972 - $8042.41
,
i•curuary 0, 1973
,I"t> at 0
• ;a;!: Con;:itto Intern, 'Lawrence i•Iarzirt
•
Budget :;:.nditure: for. Eencral relief by municipalities in R^_n,:epin County
•
1. North rural gennepin County Welfare Department
1971 54.7"/,
i _ 40,007.18 •
Direct relief 45.37.
Administrative coats 33,200.663,20 .
TOTAL 784.
1972 34•,297.22 49.9%
• Direct relies
Administrative costs 34,495.00 50.1%
2. Suburban ltennepin County Welfare Department
1971
Direct Relief 93,438.53
Administrative coat 51,419.95
144,858.48 .
f0T.\L . •
i
61.8%
197 7 07. �
Direct relief 90,926.91 61
Ad:oi-niatrativa. cost 56,343,66 38.
147,270.57
TOTAL
3. t;',c,oria;;ton Social Services Departaleat
1977_ 67.3x
38,176.26 67.3%,
Direct. trareltiE 13,676.00
Ldn:inistra.ive coat
56,852.25
4. C1t:y of 0.i 0nn,pol.i•;, Division of Public Relief 1
1912 73.47.
2,874,326.36 73.47.
A Direct,1n relief. 1,046,738.00 '
Admi nistrat.ive costs 3,921,064.36
TOTAL
a. •
3 A • Monday, February 2S, 1973
ree
minneap OAS
(..i.r1
j �M1 '''r:: •
'Xe0'' isaF'.:d'."'.Ati 7l.!•lt.'i4',#48 i•o^^1rT .
EstebIlshed1367 avid ell t4.aikyEditor
1'/allace Alkyl Nanaging Edna
I.aurerd Imidp Editorial Editor
Volume CVI Number 278
ropo @>1r relief-law change
The antiquated township poor-relief pin District Court has ruled that
system would be abolished and poor Hennepin need not contribute to Mire
relief would he the responsibility of neapolis relief because of the "first
each Minnesota county under a bill class"designation.
sponsored In the Minnesota Senate by
Sens.Robert Tennessee of Minneapo- A state survey last October showed
lis and Alec Olson of Willmar.Since that at that time there were 2,277
Winona County, by referendum,shift- relief cases in Minneapolis and 159
ed to the county system this year,only elsewhere In Hennepin County.There
12 counties now operate under the were a total of 71 other general relief
township system. They are Hennepin, cases in the other 11 counties under
Pecker, Douglas. LeSueur, Morrison, the township relief system.Relief Is
Otter Tail, Pennington, Polk, Rice, costly to Minneapolis taxpayers. The
Sherburne,Swift andTodd.Passage of city has budgeted$3.6 million for it
the bill would be a welcome step,on a this year.
local level,toward long-sought,more
uniform, more efficient welfare laws. The proposed law was written by an
interim legislative tax study comma-
Poor relief usually Is short-term and sion.Olson said none of themunicipal-
often for emergencies."Categorical" ities in his distrct would be affected,
welfare for the re the blind and the but Ise offered to he a sponsor because
disabled will continue to be adininis- the dual Minneapolis and efHy systems
n
tered by the counties and financed Countywelfare
with county,state and federal funds "are a waste of taxpayer dollars."
until Jan. I, 1174,when the federal Also, he raict,"the present law puts an
Social Sonisity Mninistration will unf.rir b.r'hrn on Minneapolis" be-
take over the blind,aged and disabled cause Minneapolis attracts many of
programs. Aid to families with de- the socially :maladjusted who need
pendent chii3r'n will continue to be poor relief, even if only temporarily.
administered by counties with county, Some come from the Hennepin Counly
state:rndfeder.al finds. suburbs.And yet,as Olson noted,"the
suburbs are relieved of the burden."
Although 12 counties are under the
township relief system,the only coon- The bill also provides that clty relief-
' ty to be significantly affected will be office employees would be shifted to
Hennepin,and If the township system the county payroll and generally
is abolished,the hip beneficiary will be would retain seniority and pension
Minneapolis. The law now provides benefits built up while they were city
that the county share a city's relief employees.
costs if less than 65 percent of the
county's tax base is within the city James Gooley,director of the Mime.
limits. Minneapolis has about 42 per- apolis relief office,in advocating pas-
cent of Ilennepin's assessed property. sage of the bill, bas said,"So *many
'fire law also eta tee that counties need people call for reform of the so-called
not contribute to cities of the first welfare mess and abetter-coordinated
class—Minneapolis,St. Paul and Du- and more efficient system.This lathe
loth.However, St.Paul's poor relief is chance for the Legislature to do
shared by Ramsey County and Du- something about it on a local level."
luth's by St,Louis County.A Henne- We agree.
I
I
\ ��1
_ EDEN LAND SALES. INC.
1 14500 Valley View Road-Eden Prairie,Minn.55343-Tel.612/941-5300
March 5, 1973
Mr. Robert Heinrich
Village Manager
Village of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Dear Mr. Heinrich:
Eden Land Corporation wishes to offer Edenvale Golf Course to the Village.
Edenval.e Golf Course was designed by Mr. Donald Herfort a golf course ar-
chitect who has done an outstanding job of providing a challenging 18 hole
golf course and driving range on 106 acres of land.
This is a completely new course which we opened for play in June of 1972.
The design of the automatic watering system and special care in blending
the soils used to meet demanding percolation criteria, have provided a
very rapid development of deep and sturdy root growth of the grasses
planted. The greens and tees have all been carefully built to provide ex-
cellent surface and underground drainage.
The design has made the roost of the topography and natural amenities. Trees,
sand traps, ponds and a trout stream have all been blended into a beautiful
and challenging test of golf.
Currently we are in the process of building a new maintenance building, a
black top parking lot, and a very attractive clubhouse and restaurant
facility.
We are very pleased with the golf course and feel the new structures being
built will make this golf course facility complete. The entire package is
being offered for $1,300,000.00. Wouldn't it be more desirable to acquire
a completed golf course at a fixed price than to build one at an unknown
but probably higher price?
Mr. Robert Heinrich
March 5, 1973
Page Two
May we have the opportunity to show this golf course to your village of—
f is ials?
Cordially yours,
EDEN LAND SALES, INC.
William J. Sine, Jr.
President
WJSJR:blt
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Paul Redpath
I
uac
•
May 18, 1972
Mr. George Hite
Village Manager
Village of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Dear Mr. Hite: if
Eden Land Corporation proposes to cell the Edenvale Golf Club to the Village
of Eden Prairie. Ile suggest the purchase of this 18-hole layout would be by
revenue bonds on current competitive terms and Eden Lind Corporation proposes
to buy any portion of the londa that can not be marketed on a public offering,
after exercise of the beat efforts by Eden Prairie.
II
The new Edenvale Golf Course was designed by professional golf course archi—
tect, lir. Donald Herfort, and was constructed by Moelter Construction Co. of
Stillwater. The watering system was engineered cad installed by Toro. There
r:re two wells one 8" and one 12" with electrically powered pumps generating
600 GPM at each pump head. A completely automatic push button ayetem has been
Ia.:ailed to water the greens mud teen. and anap valves to water the fairways
and rough. The course covers 106 acres of land.
All of the tees and greens have been carefully built to provide proper surface -'
and underground drainage. The soils used to build the greens and tees were
all subjected to percolation tests to allow penetration of water, fertilizer
and air and miniriae any compaction problems. The development of a deep and
massive root growth of the greases planted la moat gratifying and indicates
ideal soil conditions exist.
The course has been designed to conserve and improve on the natural amenities
available throughout the area. The trees, sand traps, ponds, and trout stream
have all been utilized to provide a beautiful layout and an interesting test
of golf on this 6,226 yard par 71 course.
•
lir. George Hite
May 18, 1972
Page Two •
Pe aro proud of this golf course and feel it will be a credit to Eden
Prairie. The price_in $1,200,000,00 which if financed by revenue bonds
issued at current competitive prices should be marketable and Eden Lands
guarantee to pick up unmarketod bonds will ensure the Village of adequate
financing.
This offering is made to the Village at our coat. and we feel it will be
a definite asset to the Village. We will appreciate your comments after
you bee had en opportunity to present our proposal to the council.
Cordially yours.
EDEN LAND CORPORATION
William J. Sime, Jr.
Vice President
WJSJittbit
FULL FVENZEL DISTINCT wr,ctu
'4440 DIN?N.cT,416.68$0YA MRS MAY66TN CHNISTENSEN.MANAGER
170 FEDERAL RISL00S
WASANNO TON OEM-_ MINNRA,OLN,MIN,NESOTA S3101
10161.44.2+46444 Swum,n 6124=32173
20242,2611 CottgrtaS of ttje Mttiteb ,tatel MlOf 6416088 KLUO.MANAGER
3101 PANS CASTES UOIAIVANO
,nNOMA FAO auge of 1 epregftltatt beg 51.1.4114.6 M�INNESOTA ex16
RICHARD D.WILLOW
4340
alaAington,;21.e. 20515
February 28, 1973
Mr. Robert Heinrich, Village Manager
Village of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Mn 55343
Dear Bob:
I have been asked by a group supporting the construction of
a toll bridge over the Minnesota River,. to be designated
the Highways 169-18 bridge, to endorse their project and
their efforts in the Legislature. Can you please advise me
of the position of your village and its council on this
matter?
Best regards,
T1L�
Bill Frenzel
Member of Congress
BF:pce
i
1.13
I
i
THIS STATIONERY PRINTED ON PAPER MADE WITH RECYCLED PRIERS I.
•
HENNEPIN COUNTY LEAGUE OF MUNICIPACITIES
3300 UNIVERSITY AVENUE S.E. MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55414
• 373-9992
ri•);
Fro,:
Inc7nsiortzt in C
itt.oribed by t ha cov.,..rt1.1.rt1
Tei a:,,LLoni Outs i.:?•7!:
701-0.„ 1 y :t-ca :lo ;:c7 ;..,1 • '
12::-.4 'in ,biit (. ).1ez.t.
•
• t-‘) .1.-.1y r...,
t t it.;„ z.b. •oil yco council.
1
• . . . „ .
. . . . . .
•
. .
•••• `ft
• '
. ,, • , , I;„ oy
L L
•-2-/3
. . .
L •
• ,1
21 t „ •
•
•
•
•' . ri,;;;c:
: ti , ' L , ",' 0 in .:. on
. • . '•
' • , • r.
'r , 1973
t
_ .
•
I 1' 1,1r
' • . • .
:1, 1, • ,1 '
•
, . ; • • ,
2 'III
.111 C1' 7719
LICENSE LIST
MARCH 13, 1973
C1('AMEPfl
Eden Prairie Oil. Products - Earl. Pederson
CONTRACTORS- 1& ?_ FAMILY
Russell11. Martinson -
H. Conrad Mfg. Co. - Gordon Raxtad
SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTE'.
Allstate Plumbing - Stephen 1\orman
Lon B. Anderson-
William G. Murphy - Murphy Plumbing & Heating
J. McClure Kelly Plumbing - J. L. Kelly
Steins, Inc. -E. II. Stein
HEATING &VENTILATING
Gopher Heating& Sheetmetal, Inc. - Warren Kelly
WELL
Henry Gess Well Co.
GAS FITT'EILS
Bowler Co. - Robert W. Bowler
Murphy Plumbing& Heating - William G. Murphy
Weather Rite, Inc. - John E. IVagon
Gopher Heating;&Sheetmetal, Inc. - Warren Kelly
DeLuxe Heating&Air Conditioning - Willi.e Nagel
\- Steins, Inc. -E. H. Stein
PLUUMSING
limb'c Plumbing&Heating Co. - Robert J. Ercatz
Allstate Plumbing - ephen Norman
dvrpy Plourbirn.&Heating - l il.]iatn C. i'
Wayzata Plumbing& Heating - Gerald G. Carling
Bowrlur Co, - itobert W. Bowler
lhompeon Phun ing - Kenneth D. Gause
J. McClure Poll1 Plumbing - J.L. Kell;
11TIlITY SERVICE INSTALLER
li11�t ;e Plhunbiul - Stephen Korman
West Siihurban Utility Contractors - John D.Van R^mortcl
Q.uickway Excavators - ,Tack A. Swedlund
Dot's Plumbing &Heating Co. - Roberi J. Kreat e
Thompson Plumbing - Kenneth D. Cause
Southtown Plumbing - LaVern Veit
Suburban Sewer Service: - Elwyn Willi:ur.a
DATE: March 2, 1973
TO: Mayor and Members of Village Council
FROM: Village Manager Robert P. Heinrich
SUB)ECT: STUDY OF COUNCIL MEETINGS AND COUNCIL AGENDA
COUNCIL MEETINGS
A survey of eleven area communities was conducted as to the conduct
• of Council meetings as a part of this study.' Management Information
Service reports were also used.2
Certain basic questions were asked in the survey and the results are
indicated below:
Question 1: How often does Council meet?
Ten communities replied that their Council conducted two (2) regular
meetings monthly. Mound meets once a month on a regular basis.
Occasionally special meetings are held to conduct assessment hearings
or specific business requiring extensive Council debate and/or citizen
participation.
Sometimes informal meetings are held with the Manager on the "off
meeting" nights with no official action being taken.
Bloomington has regular meetings twice a month, "study" meetings two
other days a month, and when there is a fifth meeting day that month
(3 or 4 a year)the Council meets with representatives of the Legislature.
. a stion 2: How long do the meetings last?
Average length of the regular meetings are 3 to 4 hours.
Question 3: Is written notice required to get on Agenda?
Six communities require written notice to appear before Council. Five
have no firm policy.
1 The 11 communities are Hopkins, Golden Valley, St. Louis Park,
Bloomington,Richfield, Edina, Crystal, Minnetonka, Brooklyn Park,
Burnsville and Mound.
2 MIS Report No. 72, How to Improve City Coy£Cil Organization and
Procedures, and Report No. 181, Rules of Order and Procedures for
Council Meetings. Y/' �i-
Study of Council Meetings and Council Agenda
March 2, 1973
Page Two
Question 4: Is discussion by persons in the audience permitted?
_ Five communities do not normally permit discussion from the floor.
Four permit discussion on any item for as long as they wish. Two
communities permit limited discussion.
Recommendations:
1. Regular meetings of the Village Council should be conducted
the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month. If a holiday
should fall on the regular meeting day, the meeting shall be
held the following Wednesday(or possibly the following Tuesday).
2. Work sessions or "study" meetings should he scheduled the
first and third Tuesdays of the month at the discretion of
the Council.
3. Special meetings for controversial items requiring public
hearings and/or extensive public participation should be
scheduled the first Tuesday of the month.
4. The fifth Tuesday of the month should be reserved as a
"Legislative" meeting at which time Metro Council, County,
State, and Federal Government representatives would be
invited for discussion of subjects affecting Eden Prairie.
5. Participation of persons in the audience in the discussion of
Village business, other than public hearings, should not be
permitted unless a request, either written, telephoned, or
spoken, had been received prior to the.Council meeting by
the Village Manager or a member of Council.
G. The Agenda should be clo:;ed at 12 noon the Thursday prior
to the regular semi-monthly meeting. The Council and
Village Manager would be permitted to discuss subjects not
on the Agenda, but official Council action could only be
taken on the late item if unanimous consent by Council
was given to permit a vote.
Study of Council Meetings and Council Agenda
March 2, 1973
Page Three
AGENDA
The recommended Agenda format is based again on a survey of area ---
communities, Management Information Service Report No. 152, Preparing
the Agenda for Council Meetings, and personal experience.
Nine area communities provided copies of their Agenda.3 Agenda format
ranged from a rather simplistic listing of items used by Mound to a very
formal printed Agenda using different colors of paper used by Bloomington.
Minutes also ranged from the brief recording of votes liken as typified
by Hopkins to an epistle-like document produced by Edina.
The agenda format that follows is recommended for Council's consideration.
Explanation of the Agenda follows:
1. Call to Order-Self-explanatory.
2. Invocation - Self-explanatory.
3. Pledge of Allegiance -Council may wish to invite various
scout groups to present the colors and lead in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag. The scout group would be invited to
come to the meeting early fora tour of Village Hall and to
observe their Village Council in action fur as long as they
wish after the presentation of the colors.
4. Roll Call - Self-explanatory.
5. Minutes- Self-explanatory.
6. Claims and Contract Pam rots-The notion to approve claims
would include the series or chock nurIbers of the claims to be
paid. Contract payman.> would be identified in the motion for
payment to assure cleat understanding by Council.
7. aids -Self-explanatory.
8. Public Hearings - When public hearings are conducted, the
Mayor will declare the hearing open for public discussion.
After everyone in the audience has had the opportunity to be
heard,the Mayor will declare the hearing closed to additional
3 Hopkins, Golden Valley, St. Louis Park, Bloomington, Edina, Crystal,
Minnetonka, Brooklyn Park, and Mound.
1
Study of Council Meetings and Council Agenda
March 2, 1973
• Page Four
public discussion. Council would then move for appro-
priate action, have discussion on the motion by Council
members only, and vote.
9. Petitions, Requests and Communications - This item of the
Agenda provides for orderly handling of petitions, complaints
and letters directed to the Village Council. At the end of
this Agenda item, the Mayor would ask if anyone in
attendance desires to speak before the Council. The Mayor
would request the individual to state his name and address
and ask if they had written or talked to any Village-appointed
official about the matter about to be presented to Council.
(This question is asked merely as an effort to inform people
that they have access to their Government through appointed
officials as well as their elected representatives.) The
person would be heard by Council and•if action or study is •
required, the matter would be referred to the Village Manager
for study and recommendation for Council's consideration at
the next regularly scheduled meeting. It is suggested that
Council refrain from open dialogue with the person as much
as possible. The Mayor should thank him for his request and •
refer the matter for study with a promise of an early report
or action by Council, At this point, active participation by
members of the audience in the conduct of this particular
Council meeting would be completed and the Mayor would
call for the next item of business. If a person in the
audience expresses a desire to be heard after this point,
the Mayor would state kindly and in an informative manner
that open discussion by members of the audience was provided
earlier in the meeting and that the currant item under con-
sideration is to be considered only by the Council.
10. Resolutions and Ordinances- Self-explanatory.
I1. Reports of Officers Boards and Commissions- This item
provides an orderly processing of staff reports, Village Manager
reports, and the reports of the various Boards, Commissions,
and Committees that are advisory and appointed by the Mayor
and Council.
12. Unfintshnd Business- Items previously tabled or deferred
would be brought to the table under this Agenda heading.
Study of Council Meetings and Council Agenda
March 2, 1973
Page rive
13. New Business- Generally self-explanatory. At this point
on the Agenda, the Mayor and Members of Council would
have the opportunity to present for considerlion anything
on their minds, including new areas of study or action
requested of the Village Manager.
14. Adjournment-Self-explanatory.
RPH:kg
•