HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 02/27/1973(1
MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL
Tuesday, February 27, 1973
7:30 P.M., Village Hall
Members present were: Mayor Paul R. Redpath, Councilmen Penzel and
Boerger and Councilwoman Joan Meyers. Also present was Village Manag
e
r
,
Robert P. Heinrich, Village Attorney, W. Harlan Perbix and Clerk, Edn
a
M. Holmgren.
I. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 31, 1973
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to approve the minutes of February
13th with the following corrections:
Page 1. II. Presentation of Housing Task Force Report. Addition to
paragraph. Mrs. Sonja Anderson, CoaChairwoman of the Task Force
reviewed and presented the report to the Council. She stated that
the Task Force had requested that a mobile home study be made in
regard to design, construction and placement on location.
Page 3. Paragraph 3. That private restrictions and covenants shall be,
etc.
Page 3. D. The Oaks. Zaciman Homes, Inc. Paragraph 1. 2nd Sentence.
It is proposed on 86 acres which would contain cluster homes and
townhouses.
Page k. Paragraph 2. 4th Sentence.
eMr. Serena, Castle Lane felt that it would not.
Page I. ,th Paragraph. Item 2. A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to
adopt Resolution No. 644, Eden-vale 6th Addition with the recommenatig.ons
in the February 6th Planning Commission minutes 1 through 7 exc
4 and the recommendations regarding placing of traffic signs by the
Public Safety Director dated February 8, 1973.
Page 6. Item E. Ordinance No. 203. Paragraph 2. A motion was made by
Mr. McCulloch to continue the second reading of Ordinance No. 203
on February 27th. Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted, etc.
Page 7. Item C. Resolution No. 651. A motion was made by Mr. Penzel, etc.
Page 8. Item 6. Last Paragraph. A motion was made by Mr. Penzel adopting
Resolution No. 655 accepting the feasibility reports of the Red Rock,
etc. gdd- Jed".
MINUTES OF JANUARY 23, 1973. Page 3. Paragraph 5. Sentence 3.
All voted no unanimously. Motion denied.
With these corrections, Mr. Penzel. seconded. All voted sere. Motion ca
r
r
l
e
d
.
Council Meeting
February 27, 1973
Page Two
APPOINTMENTS
A. Mayor's Appointment of Mrs. Kay Frick to Advisory Committee-CATV.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to approve the Mayor's appointment of
Mrs. Kay Frick to the Advisory Committee-CATV. Mr. Penzel seconded.
All voted eye. Motion carried.
B. Mayor' s Appointment of Mr. Ray Earls as Assistant Weed Inspector.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to approve the Mayor's appointment of
Mr. Ray Earls as Assistant Weed Inspector. Yrs. Meyers seconded. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Creekwood Estates, Hustad Development Corp. Rezonini from District
Rural to R1 13.5. First Reading Ordinance No. 206. Preliminary
Plat Approval. Resolution No. 64' 5.
Bill Bonner, Busted Development Corp. presented and reviewed the Creek.
wood Estates project. It is located on 26 acres containing 52 lots,
bordered on the south by County Road 1, on the west by Creek Knoll Road,
on the north by Purgatory Creek and on the east by the Pleasant Hill
Cemetery. Mr. Bonner reviewed the creek dedication near Creek Knoll Road
on the west and north part of the project. He noted the rather distinct
ridge which falls away from the Creekwood project and to the creek
very steeply. He further talked about the low area on the north and
east side of the Creekwood Estates. He stated that Hudstad Development
Corp. was doing further study on that area and requested additional
time to consider the alternatives and to work with adjacent land owners.
He further reviewed plans for dedicating land to the Village for creek
trallway and preservation purposes. He further stated that the north
boundary and the northeast corner of the project are would be considered
at a later date, to close the hearing
and
There being no further discussion, Mr. Penzel made a motion/im adopt
the first reading of Ordinance No. 206. Mrs. Meyers seconded. All
voted eye. Motion carried.
Mrs. Meyers made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 645 approving the
preliminary plat of Creekwood Estates including Planning Commission
reconmendations of February 20, 1973 deleting item 4 with the following
substitution: That this plat be granted variances on Lots 4-, 5 and 6
of Block 1 for possible lot size reduction. Mr. Penzel seconded. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
B. Basswoods, Site d2, The Preserve, Mark Z. Jones. Request for Rezonim
from District Rural to Rid 2.5. First Re Ordinance No. 209.
Preliminary Plat Approval. Resolution N:c.linA.
Dick Putnam, Village Planner and Scott Godin, Mark Z. Jones reviewed
and presented the Basswood, Site d2 project. Yr. Godin reviewed the
site plan with revisions after meeting with members of the various
commission, the Village Planner, the Developer and Architecjit in order
to determine if the buildings should be
Council Meeting
February 27, 1973
Page Three
located as far into the woods as indicated on the initial plan. The
revised plan would drop four units, bringing the total to 62 units
rather than 70 units. The easterly building would now be in a straight
line by approximately 4o feet pulling it almost entirely out of the
woods.The revised plan Indicates a distance of over 100 feet between
the buildings. Parking is provided on this site for approximately 214.
guest spaces in front of the units with the remaining parking under the
building at a relationship of approximately 11 spaces per unit. Kr.
Putnam stated that revisions to the site plan have been centered around
the basic issues of balance between buildings and preservation of the
natural site. Minimizing of the tree damage and maximizing of the views
for the units into the woods and the views to the north toward Anderson
Lakes is an ideal feature of this building site.kameamxtitex
RI's. Meyers commended the developer and architect for *Etc the work done
on this project to improve it.
There being no further discussion, Mr. Boerger made a motion to close)",
the hearing and adopt the first reading of Ordinance No. 209 rezoningV-14444,ers...6
from 1bmatcts District Rural to RM 2.5. Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted Aze
aye. Motion carried.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to adopt Resolution No. 648 approving
the preliminary plat of Basswoods, Site d2 including the Planning
Commission recommendations of February 20, 1973. Recommendations
1 thru 5 excluding 4, substituting the following to be included in
the motion: That this plat is granted variances for Lots 14, 5 and
6 of Block 1 for possible lot size reduction. Mr. Boerger seconded
All voted aye. Motion carried.
C. Improvement Hearing for Extension of Sanitary Sewer Along West 78th
Street from PurEatory Creek to Rosemount Engineering Company. 72-7-25.
Resolution No. 049.
Dave Huseby, Rieke, Carroll Muller presented and reviewed the extension
of sanitary sewer along West 78th Street. He stated that when they first
reviewed the project the estimated cost had been $80,000 but after soil
tests the area was found to contain some bad material hence the $120,000
cost had been estimated.
Paul Anderson, Attorney representing his father Calvin Anderson appeared
to oppose the installation of pipe. His father feels that the land is
not buildable or feasible at this point because of Highway 212 plans and
flood plain, asked that it be rejected.
Mr. Huseby stated that only the buildable property would be assessed at
the present time but that it would be NUM when more property becomes
buildable6 reassessed
The Manager stated that nothing would be assessed in the flood plain.
He also said that Rosemount Engineering has a great need for utilities
Dick Putnam, Village Planner noted that as long as the property was
being filled, there must be the intent to use.
Council Meeting
February 27, 1973
Page Four
There being no further questions or discussion, Mr. Boerger made a
motion to close the hearing and adopt Resolution No. 649 approving
the extension of sewer on West 78th Street and order plans and
specs be prepared. Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
D. Improvement Hearing, for Extension of Water Service to the Area
Around and Including Rosemount Engineering Company. WTR
Resolution No. 661.
Fred Whiting, Black & Veatch presented and reviewed the extension of
water service on West 78th Street project. He recommended that after
exploring several ways of serving this area with water, 1,e felt that
the service be provided from a lateral water mein which will extend
west approximately 2330 feet from a connection to a proposed 16 inch
trunk water main along Flying Cloud Drive. He also recommended that
the lateral main be constructed on the north side of the right-of—way
of 78th Street due to topography considerations. The proposed water
main to serve Rosemount area would be 12 inches and he feels that
this will be adequate to provide dependable service and also future
developments in the area.
Paul Anderson again objected to the project, feels that the Village
is asking them to subsidize Rosemount.
There being no further questions or comments, Mr. Boerger made a
motion to close the hearing and adopt Resolution No. 661 approving
the extension of water service to the area around and including
Rosemount Engineering Company and order plans and specs be prepared.
Penzel seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
IV. ORDINANCES MM RESOLUTIONS
A. Second Reading, Ordinance No. 203. Eden Farms. Reclassification
of 11 Lots from District Rural to RM 6.5.
This item was postponed until March 13, 1973.
B. Second Reading, Ordinance No. 208. Basswoods, Site b. The Preserve.
Rezoning from District Rural to RAI 6.5.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to adopt the second reading of Ordinance
No. 208 and order published. Mil . Meyers seconded. All voted eye.
Motion carried.
C. Homart Development Company. Rib Concept Approval of Approximately
100 Acres. Resolution No. 660. Rezoning of Showing Mall and
(02 Parking from District Rural to C—Regional Shopping-Eden Prairie
€ftr . Ordinance No. 213, First Reading.
Dick Putnam presented and reviewed the proposed shopping center located
on approximately 100 acres bounded by West 78th Street to the north,
U. S. Highway 169/212 to the west end. the proposed Ring Route to the
south and east.
Council Meeting
February 27, 1973
Page Five
Mr. Putnam reviewed a condensed version or a Staff Report on this
project. He reviewed his recammendatices 1 through 7 in regard
to the PUD Concept Plan, future development, C-Reg.zoning, etc.
Village Attorney, Mr. Perbix suggested that this report be made a
part of the resolution approving the Concept Plan and also the
Planning themzhadmencempanricastdtamosker Report of December 29, 1972.
Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
A notion was made by Mr. Penzel to adopt the first reading of Ord-
inance No. 213 approving reclassification of the Shopping Mall and
Parking Area from District Rural to C-Regional Shopping. Mrs. Meyers
seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
V. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
toodispaxdomexiSmactianurAdagmtimakx
Oft .1 .21 I all.P .O•nn s .41 ao111•••n• 41111•1• "M. •
A. Letter from Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District, 2/14/73.
Marty Jessen, Park& Recreation Director re -viewed a joint venture
proposal for open space planning alaig Purgatory Creek with the
Council. He stated that he felt that the scope of the joint study
ought to include management planning for natural habitats and
hydrologic cycle of the creek, recreational planning for the use
of these resources and interpretive planning for environmental
education and leisure education in the natural process. The Riley-
Purgatory Creek Watershed District steed in their letter of February
14th that they would be willing to participate in a study at a cost
of $5,000 provided that the Village would also be willing to partici-
pate in such a study and expend a similar amount. Mr. Jessen stated
that he understood that this amount could be used out of the Contingency
Fund in order to match the Watershed District proposal.
A notion was made by Mrs. Meyers to request Mr. Jessen to bring in more
detail atimunomoddampolaccidoem for the March 13th meeting after working
more with the Watershed District and Brauer & Associates. Mr. Penzel
seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
VI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. Report of Councilman McCulloch:
Hennepin County League of Municipalities Activities.
Mr. McCulloch was absent from the meeting.
B. Report of Direct of Parks and Recreation:
1. Status Report on Park Bond Fund.
Mr. Jessen reviewed the Park Bond Fund Status Report dated February 20,
1973 for the Mayor and members of the Council. He reported that the
current balance was $44,000; grants receivable of $292,896.25; purchases
payable of t519,062.50; grants receivable of $345,120.40 leaving a net
balance of 162,954.15. Future commitments in the amount of $1,265,230
were reported for Bryant Lake and Anderson lakes options and Treats
receivable in a like amount.
Council Meeting
February 27, 1973
Page Six '
2. Recommendation to Purchase Jim Boyce and Ed Woody Property
at Staring Lake for Park Purposes.
Mr. Jessen a recommended purchase of the Jim Boyce and Ed Wood property
of 15.5 acres on the south side of Staring Lake between the lake and
Flying Cloud Airport. Two appraisals have been completed on the property,
one ordered by the Village indic ated a market value of $85,250, the other
by Mr. Boyce and Mr. Woody at $120,000. The 1970 market value of the
property was $87,000 and 1972 at $180,000. The Village can purchase the
land for cash at a price of $120,000. This parcel has been funded out
of the 1971 LAWCON money for a lesser amount $80,000; however, based on
the appraisal by Mr. Boyce and also based on the recent condemnation
award on the Blesi property across the lake from this parcel, Mr. Jessen
stated that the $120,000 price appeared to be reasonable. He said an
attenrpt will be made to secure additional funding from Lawcon and State
sources to cover the increased cost.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to approve the purchase of the Boyce/
Woody property for $120,000 for park purposes. Mrs. Meyers seconded.
On roll call, all voted aye. Motion carried.
3. Report on Condemnation Award for Gordon Blesi Property at
Staring Lake.
Marty Jessen reviewed the Gordon Blasi condemnation award report dated
February 20, 1973 with the Mayor and mesnbers of the Council. He stated
that the condemnation commission had completed its hearing and filed
an award for the Blesi parcel as follows: Fee Award $87,500 and $300
Appraisal Allowance. The parcel includes 10.591 acres plus a log cabin
in good condition. The Village had an appraisal done on the property
that indicated a value of $50,400. The landowner had an appraisal done
at $115,000. The value for tax purposes for 1973 is $75,900. He noted
that LAWCON funding for one-half of an estimated value of $63,000 had
previously been approved. The Village will seek a LAWCON contract
amendment to cover the Federal Share of the increased cost. He said
that generally the Federal Share is increased when the cost is increased
as a result of a condemnation award.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to accept the condemnation award and
approve purchase of the Blesi property in the amount of $87,500 plus
$300 appraisal allowance if the property owner accepts. Mr. Penzel
seconded. On roll call, all voted aye. Motion carried.
n •••••n ••'.•41
n ••'n bv•••• I 111 .1.14.1"44
4. Allocation of Money to Survey Properties Along Nine Mile Creek
for Park Purposes and Conduct a Naturalist Study of the Area
to be Used in the Design Process.
Marty Jessen, Park Director reviewed a request for funds to survey
land adjacent to Nine Mile Creek in the area of the recent park donation
frown Northern States Power Co. He stated that hoot the land that had
Council Meeting
February 27, 1973
Page Seven
been donated was just west of I-494 along Nine Mile Creek. The donation
case about ubecause of the effort on the part of certain private land/'
owners in that area working in conjunction with the Village Staff and ,'
Northern States Power Co. in an attempt to develop a creekway trail
system/open space plan in that area. Included among these land owners
were the Howard Kaerwers, the Presbyterian Church and the Russell Marshs.
Mr. Marsh has presented a development proposal for his land, which
identifies the creekway for dedication as public open space. The Kaeniers
and Presbyterian Church representative have indicated a willingness to
donate the land owned by them to the Village. He indicated the only cost
to the Village in acquiring these properties would be for surveys necessary
to provide proper legal descriptions of the properties. It is estimated
that survey costs for these two parcels would be approximately $2,500.
By acquiring these two parcels, the Village would have ownership to all
of the land along Nine Mile Creek between 494 and Baker Road.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to authorize survey work in the amount
of $2,500 for property along Nine Mile Creek to be used from the Park
Bond Fund. Mr. Redpath seconded. On roll call, all voted aye. Motion
carried.
7
C. Report from Village Clerk:
Village Clerk's Recommended License Application List dated
February 27, 1973.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to approve the Clerk's recommended
license application list dated February 27th. Mr. Boerger seconded.
All voted eye. Motion carried.
D. Bid Award. Sub-Trunk Sanitary Sewer Improvement - Nine Mile One-A 1
SAN 72-1-12. 1 for the Nine Mile One-A co
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to award the bid/to the lowest bidder
American Contracting Co. in the amount of $43,312. Mr. Penzel seconded.
On roll call, all voted aye. Motion carried.
VII. FINANCES
A. Payment of Claims No. 1478 through 1553.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to approve payment of claims no. 1478
through 1553 for payment. Mr. Redpath seconded. On roll call, all
voted aye. Motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 11:20 P.M.
E -tna M. Holmgren, Clerk
EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL
Tuesday, February 27 0 1973
7:30 p.m., Village Hall
INVOCATION -- PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -- ROLL CAL
L
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Paul Redpath, Joan Meyers, John McCulloc
h
,
Wolf Penzel, Roger Boerger.
COUNCIL STAFF:
Village Manager Robert P. Heinrich: Village
Attorney Harlan Perbix; Clerk Edna Holmgren.
AGENDA
I. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING HELD FEBRUAR
Y
1
3
,
1
3
7
3
.
U.I PPOINTMENTS.
Mayor's Appointment of Mrs. Kay Frick to Advisory Com
m
f
t
t
e
e
-
C
A
T
V
.
•
/5. Mayor's Appointment of Mr. Ray Earls as Assista
n
t
W
e
e
d
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
o
r
.
Action: Motion approving Mayor's Appointments.
si III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
I A. Creekwood Estates, Hustad Development Corporation. Request for
rezoning from District Rural to RI 13.5 and Preliminar
y
P
l
a
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
.
(Report attached)
Action: I. First reading of Ordinance No. 206 approving reclassification
Npf District Rural to RI 13 .5
2. qtlotion adopting Re solution No. 645 approving Preliminary Plat.
Basswoods, Site d2, in The Preserve, Mark Z. Jones request for rezoning
of District Rural to RM 2.5 of approximately 4.7 acres
a
n
d
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
Plat approval. (Report attached)
Action: 1. First Reading of Ordinance No. 209 approving reclassification
/ of District Rural to RM 2 .5
2/ Motion approving Resolution No. 648 approving Preliminary
Plat approval.
Improvement Hearing for the extension of sanitary sewer along West
78th Street from Purgatory Creek to Rosemount Enginee
r
i
n
g
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
.
(Engineer's feasibility report attached)
Action: Motion closing hearing and approving Rsolut
f
n
N
o
.
p
g
a
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
improvement project, and ordering preparation of pla
n
s
a
n
d
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
-
cations, or deny.
D. Improvement hearing for the extension of water service to the area
around and including Rosemount Engineering Compan
y
.
(
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
'
s
feasibility report attached)
Action: Motion closing hearing and approving Resolution go. 661 approving
Improvement Project and ordering preparation otplan
s
a
n
d
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
-
cations, or deny.
Council Agenda
February 27 • 1973
Page Two
IV.VRDINANC ES AND RESOLUTIONS
Second Reading: Ordinance No. 203, Eden Farms reclassification of
11 lots from District Rural to D.R. M. 6.5. (Letter from Hennepin
County and Shelter Corporation's response to Mr. Andrew Daniluk's
questions are attached)
Action: Motion approving Second Reading of Ordinance No. 203.
V\ B. $acond RrInding of_Ordinanne No. 208 approving the rezoning of
BAsswoods. Site b, in The Preserve, from District Rural to RM 6.5.
.., Action: Motion approving Second Reading of Ordinance No. 208.
C Request by Homart Development Company for Concept Approval of
approximately 110 acres 'and Rezoning of Shopping Mall and Parking
from District Rural to C-Regional Shopping-Eden Prairie Center.
(Resolution Attached)
Action: 1 • Motion adopting Resolution No. 1 50, approving concept
V./ Petitions, Requests and Communications
A. Letter from Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District, dated
2/14/7 3 . (Attached)
Action: Receive and file.
J VI.\itEPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS, AND COMMISSIONS
/A. Report of Councilman McCulloch:
Hennepin County League of Municipalities activities. (Attached)
/B.\ /Report of Director of Parks and Recreation:
/4. Status Report on Park Bond Fund.
. Recommendation to purchase Tim Boyce and Ed Woody property at
pterina Lake for Park Purposes ' (Report attached)
Action: Motion to accept recommendation to purchase or deny and
proceed with condemnation proceedings.
X3 . Report on Condemnation Award for Gordon Blest Property at
Staring Lake. (Report attached)
approval and stipulating continge cies and recommendations
upon which approval is based andl zoning is granted.
2. First Reading of Ordinance No. 3 , approving Reclassifi.
cation of Shopping Mall and Parking Area from District Rural
to C-Regional Shopping.
Action : Motion to accept award and authorize payment or to appeal.
Council Agenda
February 27, 1973
Page Three
VI/EPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS, AND COMMISSIONS (Cont.)
B. Report of Director of Parks end Recreation (cont.)
4. Albcation of money to survey properties along Nine Mlle Creek
for Park Purposes and conduct a naturalist study of the area to be
used in the design process !, (Report attached)
/C • Report of Village Clerk:
Village Clerk's recommended License Application List. (Attached)
Action: Motion approving License Application List.
VII. FINANCES:
A. Payment of Claims No. 1478 to 1553. (Attached)
Action: Motion approving payment of Claims No. 1478 to 1553.
VIII AMOUR NMENT
Action: Motion authorizing expenditure of $2,500 for study.
4 „rfre ".
e-014.-or. -1.4 • rk-st t • '? •
xerc-d'
-4A/c
a.7,7 X) ZI2
4LJ .
—
:13'tc.c.,4-4-c/-reoL t4D'ALTZ..
G frwit-r- _
F .
r :4 ,0 • iLe...4447
— it,e1144•44-- P/' f
277:
"Ye
iVht_ -yo o
Fut
711/1 jet4 r sAA-
$S
00 4".
/2-4-r&ta.te.e
4.4-(4rr•vta•le, den bA
;6ket pey,i-reJ
6,7
/ c;IDI
I 7
4s7
-
a/4,J
2,4,t 41-14€44-4-0 1,449 - Ye- .00
A.1-ette-
L1 (1WtZ
v ,u,t- efo
C .90 0
- p,s.t4z -f. —
e'4-1
„e „i et) n
1-tot-e -Pe—
/La -re
(A.g. 4k4e4,1 _.-.L4rLA-1-e.c..E.--3 0114(4
IAA" -7/ 0,-/ Ake-WA,
e_ / 1-44-rt
aAriPAL , "Li /z,ty ,4- der •
NLA-• ,•4 •-e>" 44, 'GC./ - 2444...d
m.:444e 4,Aavet"4.1.)
rfv .
ed .
64/i ar1.1
A Atte
/top, -
/t e.t44.<4,wft,
pA4.7 , rei
*Ati ida7nAliet
64.1.1) fra4
/1"6.t' (71114"
z.‘,0
•
-
- /rt.el
4/71 0/4. n 3
Jae 4,„ag..d aye
,r -
704
x„/ vi/4/7.5 4
- m414F
-5
--m*-re
74x <7,Le-
.f 3
. wet,
'41
,f,(/"Zie ,041.7;a41 -
yj: nPutt
I-s . /624i.44-4 7,_;„
4-,34 1.frat.
— 192
itiff/Mrill
62-) 9AL t I
, 000 e4.4.0t
r /v/e_
(n/)
0/ 7e) A-fi,eret Ltfa .4Ce-f/r-,"
1 7 ,z =.2•9
.
,4"
_ g •4IA-) '1'7A-
..fAm-vn-e-ti "ectit4.11- V‘rD 0.
fiLi/ his6,44 6 1 friyit4 1.402a 119 Z AA*/
g/1-4-f-ot v 4•11, 4444e
77 l:1-
t-
lir tf Tol
/,./e.
4:t
-m14 p-A. 7
A :Li., , 3/; - 444/Rn46_,t
AA llf Aue) seilt-n/
id 2 -144t 61rnt)
7/.7,o
1.1111117ES
EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL
Tuesday, February 13, 1973
7:30 P.M., Village Hall
Continued to:
Wednesday, February 14, 1973
Members present were : Ilayor Paul R. Redpath, Councilmen Penzel, Boerger,
McCulloch and Joan neyers. Also present was Village Manager, Robert P.
Heinrich, Village Attorney, U. Harlan Perbix and Clerk, Edna M. Holngren.
I. MINUTES OF JNIUARY 23, 1973
A motion was made by fir. Boerger to approve the minutes of January 23rd
as published with the following corrections:
Page 1 - Minutes of January 9th, Item B - A motion was made by Mrs.
Meyers appointing John McCulloch as the respresentative, etc.
Page 2 - Shelter Homes - Eden Farms - Paragraph 1 - He also stated that
by moving Duck Lake Trail to the north, it would clean up the corner
and facilitate an underpass at the service center.
Page 4 - Contract with Howard, needles, Tamen & Bergendoff - On roll
call, Messrs Redpath, licCulloch and Penzel and Mrs. Ileyers voted aye,
Mr. Boerger abstained. !lotion carried.
111th these corrections, fir. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
II. PRESENTATION OF HOUSING TASK FORCE REPORT.
Mrs. Sonia Anderson, Co-Chairwoman of the Task Force reviewed and presented
the report to the Council. The Myer commended the comnission and those
j Aofe that had contributed to this report. He stated that it had been well done.
He requested the staff to send a copy to John Cosmano, former Councilman
who had contributed much to the commission.
III. MAYOR'S APPOINTMENTS:
A. Appointment of Councilman Roger !Merger as Village Council Represent-
ative on the Park and Recreation Commission.
A motion was made by firs. Meyers to approve the Mayor's appointment of
Roger Boerger to the Park and Recreation Comnission as Council represent-
ative for a term to expire on December 31, 1975. Mr. Penzel seconded.
All voted aye. Motion carried.
B. Appointment of firs. Becky Anderson to fill the unexpired term of
Councilman Wolf Penzel on the Human Rights Convnissfon.
k motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to approve the Mayor's appointment of Ms.
Becky Anderson to the Human Rights Commission for a term to expire on
December 31, 1974. fir. Boerger seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
Council Meeting
February 13, 1973
Pago Two
Ill. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A- Creekwood Estates. Hustad Development Corporation.
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
District Rural to Ri 13.5. Preliminary Plat Approval.
A motion was made by hr. Boerger to continue this heari
n
g
u
n
t
i
l
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
27th. Cl,-. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. lbtion car
r
i
e
d
.
B. Basswoods, Site d2. Mark Z. Jones. Rezoning fron Dist
r
i
c
t
R
u
r
a
l
t
o
itfi 2.5. Preliminary Plat Approval.
A motion was made by firs. Meyers to continue this hear
i
n
g
u
n
t
i
l
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
27th. fir. Boerger seconded. All voted aye. Motion ca
r
r
i
e
d
.
C. Basswoods, Site b The Preserve. Clark Z. Jones and As
s
o
c
.
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
from District bral to RII 6.5. Ordinance flo. 208, First Reading.
.Prel iminary -Plat Approval. Resolution No. 647.
Dick Putnam, Village Planner and Scott Bodin, Mark Z. J
o
n
e
s
&
A
s
s
o
c
.
reviewed and presented Basswoods, site B, single family
a
t
t
a
c
h
e
d
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
of a cluster of four dwellings each with private areas
.
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
a
r
e
seven four-unit structures with double garages for each
u
n
i
t
a
n
d
f
o
u
r
additional open parking spaces. It is located on 5.6 ac
r
e
s
b
o
u
n
d
e
d
b
y
the East/West Parkway to the south and the Collector R
o
a
d
t
o
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
and west in The Preserve.
IMr. Putnam reviewed the following five recormendations b
y
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Comission at the February 6th meeting:
I. That approval be subject to Village Staff approval
o
f
f
i
e
l
d
location for each building.
2. That preliminary plat approval is based upon the Village
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
"field location" for the 28 townhouse lots on site b in t
h
e
"Basswoods".
3. That the development of the adjacent and surrounding pro
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
shall be dependent on the impact on this development.
4. That recreational vehicular storage shall be required and
s
u
c
h
storage areas shall be visually screened.
5. That enforceable restrictions and covenants shall be eff
e
c
t
u
a
t
e
d
so as to maintain and preserve the natural forest.
The Village Attorney questioned recommendation number fi
v
e
.
H
e
n
o
t
e
d
that the Village should not get involved in covenants a
n
d
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
Hrs. Meyers questioned whether there were any trails prop
o
s
e
d
,
s
h
e
w
a
s
told that there would be soft paths to the main path. f
i
r
.
P
e
n
z
e
l
a
s
k
e
d
when was the starting date, he was informed that it would
b
e
A
p
r
i
l
1
s
t
of this year at the earliest. He also asked the price ra
n
g
e
o
f
t
h
e
units, he was told that they would be in the $35,000 to $
4
5
,
0
0
0
a
r
e
a
.
Council Meeting
February 13, 1973
Page Three
There being no further cements or discussion, Drs. Meyers made a
motion to close the hearing and adopt the first reading of Ordinance
No. 208 approving the rezoning of Basswoods, Site 13 frcm District
Rural to Rh 6.5. Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. notion carried.
A motion was made by firs. Meyers to adopt Resolution No, 647 for
preliminary plat of Basswoods, site b including the February 6th Planning
Commission recorrmendations 1 through 4 with 5 changed to read:
That private enforemble restrictions and covenants shall be effectuated
so as to encourage maintainance and preservation of the natural forest.
111th this change, 11r. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. notion carried.
D. The Oaks. Zachman Homes, Inc. Planned Unit Development Approval.
Resolution No. 646.
fir. Zachman, Zachinan Homes, Inc. presented and reviewed The Oaks
PUD Concept Plan located east of Red Rock Lake on the Seifert farm
otA.,101, within the RED ROCK Sector. It is proposed on 86 acres which would
contain 31rhomes and ar townhouses. Space is provided for a garage
which will be blacktopped but with an option to build. The Oak's
project zero lot line home would cost about $2C,000 with an additional
$2,700 for a double garage; the townhouse about $21,800 with an additional
$1,500 for a single garage. Hrs. Meyers stated that the Planning Cormission
felt that the garages should be included without an option as it might
improve the site. fir. Penzel asked if graduated home payments were
available and was told that they were not at the present tire. The
Village Attorney asked about the cost of the lot and was told that
it was about $6,000 which included blacktopped streets, sewer, water
and fully sodded.
The Village Planner, Dick Putnam reviewed the elements of the Red Rock
Plan which influence The Oaks, ie ilitchell Road, East/Hest Parkway and
Scenic Heights Road. He noted that the East/Host Collector road alignment
indicated in Zac hren Homes' proposal will be carefully examined before
final road design approval is granted.
There being no further questions or comments, Hrs. 1eyers made a motion
to close the hearing and adopt Resolution no. 646 approving the Planned
Unit Development Plan for The Oaks. fir..Penzel seconded. All voted
aye. lbtion carried.
E. Edenvale 6th Addition. Eden Land Corp. Reclassification from
District Rural to Rfl 6.5. Ordinance No. 205 First Reading.
Preliminary Plat Approval. Resolution 010. 6.44.
Dick Putnam, Village Planner presented and reviewed the Edenvale 6th
Addition preliminary plat plan, an 87 lot single family subdivision
located in the northeast secion of Edenvale south of Kings Forest.
Proposed are hones that will range in the area of $40,000 — $50,000
of a coventional nature with some grouped open spaces providing
necessary space for the Edenvale pedestrian pathway systems as well as
Council Meeting
February 13, 1973
Page Four
providing excellent private single family living environment.
The conern for through traffic from Golf View Drive north using
Kingston Drive was expressed by several residents. Mr. Renier,
Holly Road stated that he felt that traffic on Holly Road was too
great at the present time and that opening up Kingston Drive would
only create more. fir. Kingrey, Holly Road, concurred with this
also. Mr. Garens , .44mmembee-Brel-ye-felt that it would not. A memo
from Jack Hacking, Director of Public Safety in regard to the matter
of a connecting road north from Valley View to Kingston and Crown
Drive was reviewed by fir. Hacki ng. Both he and the Fire Chief strongly
recommended this for emergency vehicles. He suggested placing stop
signs at the intersection of Valley View Road and Kingston, the
intersection of Kingston and Crown, and the existing stop signs at
Kingston and Holly and Holly and Baker. He also recommended making
the connecting roadway a one way road for south bound traffic only
from Crown Drive to Valley View. Mr. Hacking felt that this would
perhaps prevent any further increase in traffic volume into Kings
Forest.
Discussion was held on possible alternates, extending West 66th and
Canterbury Lane to the north. It was felt that until land use to the
north of Kings Forest and Ponderosa Hills is established this cannot
be determined.
1. There being no further discussion, Mrs. Meyers made a motion
to close the hearing and adopt the first reading of Ordinance No. 205
zoning Edenvale 6th Addition to MI 6.5. Mr. Doerger seconded. Messrs.
Boerger, Penzel and Redpath and Mrs. tleyers voted aye. Mr, ticCulloch
voted no. tbtion carried.
2. A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to adopt Resolution No. 644,
Edenvale 6th Addition with reconmendations in the February 6th Planning-
i.inutes 1 through 7 excluding 4 and the recommendations of
Pub ic Safety Director dated February 8, 1973. Included in this
tion is the addition that a Public Safety traffic count be required
on Holly Road before Kingston Drive is opened and that the study is
made available to the public.
fir. Redpath seconded. Messrs. Boerger, Penzel and Redpath and firs.
Meyers voted aye. Mr. ttCulloch voted no. Motion carried.
F. Improvement Hearing for the Extension of Sanitary Sewer Along West
781th Street from Purgatory Creek to Rosemount Engineering Co.
This hearing was continued until February 27, 1973 in order to consider
proposed water lateral project for this area at the same time.
G. Hipp's Mitchell Heights Plan 'V Improvement and Bid /Word for Street
and Utility Construction.
Mr. Farnsworth, Brauer & Assoc ., presented and reviewed the Hipp's Mitchell
Heights Plan 43* Improvement. Mrs. Meyers asked if there was a 20%
coverage that could be used to improve Hiawatha Avenue. Mr. Farnsworth
Council Meeting
February 13, 1973
Page Five
stated that there was. He recommended that the Base Bid work and a
modified Alternate A be awarded to the apparent low bidder, Northdale
Construction Company. Alternate A calls for deletion of gravel base
and addition of bituminous base for streets. Alternate A should be
modified by deleting the bituminous wearing course for streets until
all construction in the area has been completed some three years hence.
Final surfacing would be accomplished by the developer before the
Village would accept street maintenance responsibilities.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to adopt Resolution No. 653 ordering
Hipp's Mitchell Heights Plan "IP Improvements, accepting plans and
specifications and accepting low bid of Northdale Construction Co.,
Alternate A, modified in the amount of $151,982. hr. Penzel seconded.
On roll call, all voted aye unanimously. Motion carried.
H. McAllister Properties. Anderson lakes Planned Unit Devel onment.
Resolution No. 658.
Dick Putnam, Village Planner, presented and reviewed the ticAl lister
Properties Anderson Lakes PUD proposal. Since the hearing on January
9th which was continued, lir. Putnam has met with residents in the area.
He stated that their concern in regard to the mount of traffic using
West 78th Street from #18 to old #169 is a valid one. He stated that
he felt that the project would not cause major traffic problems along
West 78th Street. He further stated that the cause of the high peak
hour volume is through traffic which will be redirected to new routes
in the next few years. The timetable for road improvements is
coordinated with the Homart Center to open in August, 1975 and the
212 diagonal which should be open in mid-1973 which should relieve
a great deal of the through traffic.
There being no further discussion, Mr. Meyers made a notion to adopt
Resolution No. 658 approving the Anderson Lakes Planned Unit Development
as recommended by the Planning Commission on February 6, 1973. Hr.
Penzel seconded. Messrs. Boerger, Penzel and Redpath and Mrs. !layers voted
aye. 11r. tkCulloch voted no. Potion carried.
V. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
A. Ordinance Relating to Licensing and Regulating the Use and Sale of
Intoxicating Liquor. First Reading, Ordinance No. 202.
The Village Manager and Council discussed and reviewed proposed definition
changes, clarifications, etc. in the proposed "Liquor License Ordinance'.
Mr. Heinrich noted that the license fee had not been determined at this
time hence Section 1-107, Subd. 1 was left blank. The investigation fee,
however, is stated in Subd. 7.
A motion was made by Mr. McCulloch to adopt the first reading of Ordinance
No. 202. ihr. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to set a Public Hearing for the Liquor
Council lieeti ng
February 13, 1973
Page Six
License Ordinance on March 13, 1973. Fir. McCul loch seconded. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
B. Ordinance No, 211. Creating and Establishing Fire Zones. First
Reading.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to adopt the first reading of Ordinance
No. 211 creating and establishing Fire Zones 2 and 3. Mr. Boerger
seconded. Al 1 voted aye. Motion carried.
C. Ordinance Pnending Ordinance No. 43 Requiring Bond for Persons or
businesses Engaged in the Construction, Alteration, Txtension,
Repair and Maintenance ofllells. First Reading, Ordinance No. 212.
A motion was made by fir. Penzel to adopt the first reading or Ordinance
No. 212 requiring a $1,000 bond to do well work in the Village. Fir.
Boerger seconded, All voted aye. Motion carried.
D. Resolution No. 652. Revoking a Portion of an Established Pkinicipal
State-Aid Street and tstabliihing a New Portion of Said Municipal
State-Aid Street.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to adopt Resolution No. 652 deleting
and designating portions of Valley View Road from Municipal State Aid
Street System. Mr. Redpath seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
E. Ordinance No, 203. Eden Farms. Second Reading, Approving Reclassifi-
cation of 11 lots from District Rural to District RN 6.5.
Andrew Daniluk, S. Eden Drive reviewed the original petition from
several residents that was presented by Douglas Lind at the January
23rd Council meeting requesting that the port ion of the "Old Deaver"
property adjacent to and north of Purgatory Creek be preserved as public
park and recreation land. He stated that they felt that questions
presented in this petition were not answered to their satisfaction. The
Manager suggested that Shelter Corp. should be requested to do this and
report back to the Council.
A motion was made by Mr. ItCulloch to continue the second reading of
Ordinance No. 203 on February 27th./A1l voted aye. Motion carried,
7,444,141_ 7k1.4.4 n144/444--,
F. Ordinance No. 210. Regulating License Fees, Permit Fees and Charges.
riFE1Wericiiit-
A motion was made by Fir. Penzel to adopt the first reading of Ordinance
No. 210. Village Attorney Perbix was instructed to review the ordinance
for corrections before the second reading. Mr. Boerger seconded. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
Council Meeting
February 13, 1973
Page Seven
VI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. Report of Councilnan Penzel: Suburban Rate Authority's Consulting
tngineer's Report Mated 1/31/13.
Mr. Penzel reported on monies spent for advertising by the Gas Company,
discussions in regard to establishing rates, etc.
Discussion was then held in regard to election or appointnent of officials
to the Metro Council. The Mayor related that no decision had been made
In regard to this. The Council requested that the Mayor write to the
Governor and Legislators that they would prefer designation by appointment
but if not, elected by popular vote. The Mayor stated that he would do this.
B. Report of Councilnan IcCulloch: Hennepin County League of Municipalities
Activi ties.
Mr. McCulloch stated that the subject of his report was covered in
item A above,
C. Reports of Village Manager:
1. Provision of Mater Service to Two Houses on Luther May. Requested
by Fir. Willard Egnan.
A motion was made by Hr. Penzel to authorize the extension of water services
to two houses on Luther Way with the condition that appropriate escrow
funds be established for future lateral benefits on Luther May. Mrs. Meyers
seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
2. Resolution llo. 651. Authorizing the Mayor and Manager to sign an
Agreement between the Village of Eden Prairie and the Hennepin
ztaiei, Ti y Alcohol Safet Action Project, Department of Transportation.
st.,dA motion was made by Mr. to adopt Resolution No. 651 authorizing
the Mayor and Manager to sign an agreement with Hennepin County Alcohol
Safety Action Project. Mr. Boerger seconded. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
3. Resolution No. 654. Authorizing the Mayor and Manager to sign an
Agreement with the City of Hopkins for Use of Pistol Range
Facilities and Other Equipment.
A motion was made by Mr. Boerger to adopt Resolution No. 654 authorizing
the Mayor and Manager to sign an agreenent with the City of Hopkins.
Mrs. Meyers seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
4. Resolution Flo. 656. Authorizing the Mayor and Village Manager
to Enter Into an Agreement with -Metro Animal Patrol Services, Inc.
to Provide Animal Control Services for the Village.
A notion was made by Mr. Penzel to adopt Resolution lb. 656 authorizing
the Mayor and Village Manager to sign an agreement with Metro Animal Patrol
Services, Inc. Mr. Boerger seconded. On roll call, al 1 voted aye unanimously.
Motion carried.
Council fleeting
February 13, 1973
Page Eight
5. Response to Metropolitan Council Transporat ion Policy.
A motion was made by Ir. Penzel to present "Eden Prairie Reaction to
the Transportation Policy, Plan and Program Section of the Metropolitan
Development Guide, Presented for Public Hearing on November 9, 1972"
dated November 15, 1972 at a meeting on Thursday, February 15th in
the Crystal City Council Chambers. firs. Meyers seconded. All voted
aye. Motion carried.
6. Feasibility Report on the Followi ro sed I rovements Within
e d Pock Planning sector:
a. Construction of Trunk Watermain in Scenic Heights Road from
Mitchell Road TIest to Hiawatha Avenue.
b. _Construction of Atherton Road Including Necessary Water and
n tom Sewer Lines from flitchell Road rasterly to the Proposed
fast/West Parkway.
C. Regrading, Paving, Construction of Curb and Gutter and Storm
Sewer in the Lxisting Bitchell Road Right -of -Way from the
Intersection of Scenic Heights Road and Mitchell Road South
to the South Line of Section
Hr. Farnsworth, Brauer II Associates reviewed and presented the above
proposed improvements within the Red Rock Planning Sector. Estimated
cost of the Scenic Heights Trunk Mater is 529,304, Atherton Road
Construction $95,1148 and Mitchell Road Improvements $99,473 totalling
$224,625 for the three projects.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel adopting Rwsolution No. 655 a
the Red Rock Planning Sector Projects a, b and c for an estimated total
of $224,625 and setting !larch 13, 1973, 7:30 p.m. in the Village Hall
for a Public Hearing. On roll call, all voted aye unanimously. Motion
carried.
7. Replatting of Lots 11 and 12, Block 1. Fairway Woods 1st
Addition. Resolution Ho. 657.
A motion was made by fir. Doerger to adopt Resolution No. 657 approving
the replatting of Lots 11 and 12, Block 1, Fairway Mods 1st Addition
necessary to move 2 lot lines seven feet due to building placement.
11r. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
8. Request by 3. I.. Henning for Permission to Leave Model Home
Advertising Sign at Intersection of Baker Road and T.H. 15.
The Manager reviewed fir. Henning's request with the Council. He stated
that he did not recommend a permanent type sign (put in the ground). fir.
McCulloch suggested that perhaps an attractive sign could be placed at
an intersection with each development of a like size and type style hung
one below each other indicating direction with an arrow. It was the
Council's feeling that granting special use permits for signs could only
create citizen and goverment problems.
Council Peeting
February 13, 1973
Page Nine
A notion was made by sirs. lieyers to instruct the Village tanager to
request Mr. Henning to remove his sign and suggest that the Village
allow sandwich type signs on week-ends until such time as Edenvale
has submitted the total sign package/graphics. Planning Commission
recommendations of January 2, 1973 are included in this motion as
follows:
a. No good cause was shown to give a special use permit or to
change the existing ordinance; therefore, the sign should be
removed.
b. Edenvale should be asked to submit and have approved the total
sign package/graphics for Edenvale and establish firm time
schedules for construction.
c. A policy should be established that the Village Staff may use
for all development signs that restrict their placement to
on-site locations, not on all main Village roads.
Boenjer seconded. All voted aye. Notion carried.
0. Village Clerk Report:
1. Village Clerk's Recommended License Application List.
It was the feeling of the Council that this list should be approved
by the Inspections Department as well as the Clerk. The matter was
continued to the February 27th meeting.
VII. FINANCES
A. Payment of Claims No. 1321 through 1477.
A motion was made by Hr. Fenzel to approve claim no 1321 through 1477
for payment. Hr. Boerger seconded. On roll call, all voted aye .
unanimously. Motion carried.
B. Cash & Investment Report.
A nation was made by Hr. Penzel to accept the Cash & Investment Report.
tin Redpath seconded. All voted aye. notion carried.
The meeting adjourned at 11:50 on February 13, 1973.
The continued meeting adjourned at 11: 15 on February 14, 1973.
Edna H. Holragren, Clerk
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAM
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 206
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO CONDO
AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 135
CREEIGIOOD ESTATES
The Council of the Village of Eden Prairie does ordain as follows:
Section 1, Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended by adding to
Section 26, Township 116, Range 22 as follows:
Located on 27 acres containing 5 11 lots, bordered on the south
by County Road 1, on the west by Creek Knoll. Road, on the
north by Purgatory Creek and on the east by the Pleasant
Hill Cemetery and in the NW 1/4 of Section 26, Range 22,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
R1 13.5
The first reading was held at a regular meeting of the Council of the
Village of Eden Prairie, this 13th day of Februsiy and finally read, adopted
and ordered published at a regular meeting of the Council of said Village
on the day of ,1973.
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATITEST:
SEAL
Edna M. Eolmgren, Clerk
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENEPIA COUNTY, KINNESGTA
RzsourrioN M. 645
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIM:11in!
PIAT OF CREEKWOOD MATES
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Village Council of the Village of
Eden Prairie, Minnesota as follows:
The preliminary plat of Creekwood Estates is located on 27
acres containing 54 lots, bordered on the south by County Rang 1,
on the west by Creek Knoll Rod, on the north by Purgatory Creek
and on the east by the Pleasant Hill Cessettay in the NW I/14 of
Section 26, Range 22, Township 116, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
is found to be in conformance with the provisions of Eden Prairie
Ordinance No. 93 (Subdivision Ordinance) end all tasendasata thereto,
and is therefore crproved.
ADOPTED by the Village Ccsuncil on hbruesy 13, 1973.
Paul R. Redpath, Heyor
ATTEST: ,
SEAL
4.
Edna N. Rolmgren, Clik
I. Croekwood, thistad Development Corp. Park an
d
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
Report and Staff Report of February 6.
fir. Putnam expressed his feelings that the
l
o
w
e
r
a
r
e
a
i
s
not well
served by the plat presented.
fir. Bonner spoke of the possible alternativ
e
s
:
1. Acquisition of more land between the legal boundary and
natural boundary.
2. Access through the western edge of the plat
.
3. Different land use—perhaps double bungalow
s
o
n
t
l
o
o
d
r
i
d
g
e
Circle.
With any of these alternatives the final pla
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
f
o
r
m
t
o
the Village ordinance.
Jedlicka, 12501 Pioneer Trail, voiced his co
n
c
e
r
n
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
the density of the plat and the dangerous ro
d
s
y
s
t
e
m
(
c
u
l
d
e
s
a
c
s
)
.
Action Taken:
The motion was made by Hr. Casey and secon
d
e
d
b
y
f
i
r
.
T
e
s
l
o
w
1. That preliminary plat approval on the Creekw
o
o
d
s
i
n
g
l
e
family subdivision and rezoning to R1 13.
5
b
e
g
r
a
n
t
e
d
;
2. That the subdivision by in conformsnto with tha County
Highway rewiretaants;
3. That lots 12 through 18 of Block 1 have rest
r
i
c
t
e
d
development and be designated as Out lot B until other
development alternatives are made in accorda
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
the Park and Recreation Commission;
That this plat be referred to the Board of Variance for
Lots 4, 5, and 6 of Block 1 for possible lo
t
s
i
z
e
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
5. That a recommendation be made to the Wate
r
s
h
e
d
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
that the 100 foot public dedicated boundar
y
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
creek be flexible to conform with the natu
r
a
l
t
e
r
r
a
i
n
.
Ration carried unanincusly.
2/12/73 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting
Creekwood I:states-Busted Development Corporation.
Bill Bonner reviewed the site and planning considerations for the
Creekwood Estates project. He indicated that they felt this was
an extremely desirable site for development in Eden Prairie because
most of the calls they are receiving from prospective buyers are
for houses in the $40-50, 000 range on a wooded lot. Busted
Development Corporation will build most of the houses in this
project, but will also sell some lots to private builders or private
citizens who will then have their own homes built.
Bonner reviewed the creek dedication near Creek Knoll Road on the
west and north part of this Creekwood Estates project. He talked
about the rather distinct ridge which falls away from the Creekwood
project and to the creek very steeply. Bonner further talked about
the low area on the north and east side of the Creekwood Estates
project, indicating that Busted Development Corporation was
presently doirg some further study on that area trying to accomplish
some plan other than the one indicated, which brings the road down
the steep slope and cul-de—sacs down in the low area, thus
requiring the filling of that entire section of their property. He
requested that they be given additional time to consider the alterna-
tives in this area, to work with adjacent land owners, and come
back with a subsequent plan to develop that portionof their project.
Blacklock asked about play space within the project and suggested
that the northeast area -- the low area -- was the most suitable
for this purpose. Garens confirmed her statement about play space
in this area and also reaffirmed the need for additional study in the
northeast area at this time.
Blacklock pointed out that the creek dedication as shown on the
Creekwood Estates project was inconsistent with the Parks and
Recreation Commission's accepted policy of 100 ft. of public
dedication from the center of any creek in Eden Prairie. She
suggested that we need to proceed quickly in developing specific
guidelines and policies which will prevent future problems. She
further stated that the top of the bluff, as in the Creekwood Estates
proposal, is usually the natural boundary for the creek which would
serve the best interest of the public for park purposes and that the
100 feet was generally rather arbitrary and did not always accom-
plish the public purpose,
Blacklock asked as to what type of fencing or clear public/private
boundary was going to be included in this plan. She suggested that
some natural barrier be established in this area to make it very
clear to the public and to the private land owners where the public
was entiticd to make use of the land.
Action Taken • ivi/Garens, 8/Erickson that the Parks and Recreation • - •
Commission recommend approval of the Creekwood Estates proposal,
deleting lots 12 through 18 of Block 1 until other development
alternatives are studied further, that the orange line "park area"
be dedicated to the Village for creek trailway and preservation
purposes, and that the north boundary and the northeast corner
of the Creekwood Estates area be considered at a later date.
Carried unanimously.
Public Works Phone 935-3381 320 Washington Av. South, Hopkins, Minnesota 55343
HeNNO,PIN COUNTY
Mr. Richard Putnam, Planner
Village of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Dear Mr. Putnam:
February 13, 1 973
RE: Proposed P1 at - "Creekwood"
CSAH 1 at Creek Knoll Road
Hennepin County Plat No. 185
Review and Recommendations
Thank you for submitting the above referenced plat for our review. We have reviewed
the proposed plat and have the following recommendations:
1. Dedicate an additional 17.0 feet of right of way - a total of 50.0
feet from the centerli ne of CSAH 1 - along CSAH 1 and the southerly
side of the plat.
2. Access to all lots should be from the internal streets rather than
from CSAH 1. Entrance Permits will be required for all street and
driveway access to CSAN 1 and can be obtained at the Maintenance
Section of the Hennepi n County Department of Public Works.
3. All proposed construction or alterations within county right of way
must be approved by the Hennepin County Department of Public Works.
If there are any questions please contact Craig D. Spencer at this office.
Very yruly yours,
,/ / /,49
7 • (..."
'Herbert 0. Klossner, P.E.
County Engineer
HOK:CDS:rm
2/6/73 Planning Commission Meeting
E. Creekwood Estates by Hustad Development Corporation, proposed for
54 single family lots, located near Creek Knoll Road and Co. Road 1 .
Mr. Bonner showed slides of the proposed sites after which Mr.
Putnam explained the possible alternate plan and the Planning
report. Mr. Putnam expressed his concern about the area fronting
on the creek. He indicated that his report was written in the
absence of grading and engineering data.
Pr. Jeff Roos explained the utilities and elevation plans for
the area.
Action Taken:
A motion was made by Mr.. Casey and seconded by Mr. Teslow that
the proposal be returned to the Watershed and Park and Recreation
Omissions and Staff for further consideration. Motion carried.
The Commission suggested to Nr. Bonner that the guidelines of the
P Si R Conaission be considered regarding the flood plain and
boundries. A written report on the lack of the play area and
ordinance compliance was requested of It. Bonner.
It was moved by Mrs. Schee and seconded by Mr. Casey that the
public hearing for this proposal be moved to the February 27
council meeting. Motion carried.
PLANNING REPORT
DATE:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT:
REQUEST:
FROM:
THROUGH:
February 1, 1973
Busted Development Corporation
Creekwood Single Family Subdivision
Rezoning to RI 13.5 and Preliminary Plat Approval for
54 lots on 26.2 acres.
Dick Putnam, Village Planner
Bob Heinrich, Village Manager
BACKGROUND:
Hustads purchased or optioned the 26.2 acre site from Eden Land
Corporation during the last few months, intending to develop a quality
conventional single family home site during 1973. The site was
located close to existing sewer interceptor and relatively close to
water, in place at the Vocational Technical School. The Village
Staff indicated during preliminary discussions that single family use
would be appropriate at that location, as well as the environmental
concerns pertinent to the site.
,RELATIONSHIP TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES
Creekwood is adjacent to major State, County, and Village transportation
routes which provides easy access to Village and Metropolitan facilities.
The site is about four miles from existing elementary and secondary
school facilities, approximately three miles from the proposed Preserve
elementary school, and about 3/4 mile from proposed Bluff West
elementary school site. Busing of children could be expected for
this area for many years.
Proximity to existing shopping facilities is limited with Southdale,
Valley West Center, Glen Lake Center, Shakopee, and Chanhassen the
nearest areas. Within the next few years, new shopping centers will
exist at Homart, The Preserve, and West Bloomington.
The Creekwood subdivision is not within safe, easy walking distance
of any neighborhood playgrounds. The nearest is Staring Lake about
3/4 mile west along Purgatory Creek. Staring Lake will not have the
field game space that Round Lake Park has for many years, if at all.
Neighborhood play field space should be provided to all Eden Prairie
residents within I to miles of their home, accessible by a safe
walkway system. Recreational space of one to five acres should be
nearby all developments of residential that are less than three to five
acres in size. The Creekwood subdivision has lots of 13,500 sq. ft. ,
most of which are heavily wooded without any open play space.
Planning Report - Creekwood Single Family Subdivision
Page Two
The areas to the east, owned by The Preserve, along the creek
have lowland areas of two to four acres in size that could be utilized
as neighborhood play space. These areas are in the floodplain,
but could be most appropriately used as recreation space. The
Creekwood plat has an area of similar character but smaller of •about
2.5 acres adj acent to the creek where the cul-de-sac is proposed.
The low area is about 1/3 in the floodplain with the rest only a foot
above the high water mark. The area does not have nature trees and
is currently ponding areas off the creek. The lowland is ringed by
a steep wooded hillside with the lowland area as a focal point of the
hillside views. I believe that neighborhood play space should be
provided to the 200 residents of the Creekwood area and I feel that
an on-site solution should be explored.
SUBDIVISION • S RELATIONSHIP TO TERRAIN;
The site is a 75 foot high wooded knoll with many mature oak, maple,
and basswood trees. The steeply sloping areas range from 40% to
20% slope with an open meadow area along Co. Rd. 42. There is
a definite break of the steep slope to moderate along the creek which
approximates the 840' contour on the west and the 825 contour on
the east. These elevations would be appropriate locations for the
public parkway boundary with the privately owned lots.
Generally the roads have been located within openings in the forest
to reduce cutting since many streets will require some cut and filling.
The roads should be within the Village standard of under 6% grade,
especially if the cul-de-sac into the lowland is moved up the hill.
The character of the heavily wooded site can be preserved if lot
sizes are sufficient, as well as carefully defined building pad sites.
Lots that are less than 13,500 sq .ft. and platted in a conventional
fashion would, I believe, be detrimental to the site - The Creekwoods
plat should have lots of greater than 13,500 sq.ft. with careful design
and siting control over individual lots, so the woods and hillside can
be maintained.
The lower cul-de-sac, located near the floodplain elevation, presents
serious problems if developed as proposed. The floodplain elevation
is 811' at this point, with basement elevation at a minimum of 812'.
The small ponding or pocket area, where the cul-de—sac is located,
is not in the floodplain, but does store runoff from the surrounding
hill and is currently wet. The effect on lots 12,13, and 14 off the
Planning Report - Creekwood Single Family Subdivision
Page Three
floodplain would greatly reduce their usable private yards. There is
no filling of the floodplain proposed in the Creekwood plat as submitted;
however, that was based upon a 810.4' floodplain elevation.
The cul-de-sac proposed would drop from an elevation of 850 to
812' in the circle over a distance of 260' which is about a 15% slope.
The necessary cutting and filling to bring the street within Village
standards of 7% grade would require major land alteration. The need
for a lift station in the cul-de-sac may be eliminated if the lots in
the low area were removed.
Land forms indicate rather strongly the most logical method of
development, which utilized the hillside views over the lovely
creek valley. The proposed plat does not recognize the value of the
hillside character by putting lots in the low area that are directly
below those on the hill. I believe the plat does not best utilize the
natural views and terrain.
SITE PLAN ANALYSIS:
RI 13.5 zoning requires not more than two units per acre. Creekwood
proposes 54 lots in 26.1 acres, which does not conform to the ordinance.
The watershed district requires a minimum of 100' from creek water
line to be public space and the Village has required all plats to meet
this standard or provide a reasonable alternate. With the large
land holding that the Hustads have along the creek south of Co.Rd. #1
which is far in excess of the 100' requirement, there should not be a
strict literal requirement. The requirement for public parkway space
must be based upon natural boundaries such as: slopes, treelines, etc.
Therefore, I believe a "field inspection" should be used to establish
the boundaries. Lots 1 - 11 along Creekwood Drive would be reduced
In size by the parkway land requirements. I would recommend that
the 840' countour be used along the creek in the northwest area and
between 820' and 830' on the north edge.
To offset the parkway deviations, I would recommend granting variances
for smaller than 13 • 500 sq. ft. lots only in those areas. The variance
would be for small discrepancies from the standard, not-for example-
7,000 sq.ft. lots.
I would recommend that the lower lots along the creek should be
eliminated and the cul-de-sac be located up the hill at about the
840'-830' elevation • with lots platted along the hillside. Modifications
Planning Report - Creekwood Single Family Subdivision
Page Four
of this may require shifting of some other roads and lots with the net
result of providing a 2 or 2.5 acre open space usable for the residents
as play or natural space. The land along the creek would be about
1 or i4 acres usable for trails and a natural buffer. The total open
space provided under this scheme is about 3 to 5 acres, or 10% to
20% of the total land area. I might point out previous projects of
single family 13,500 sq.ft. lots such as: Round Lake Estates 20%
plus open space, Valley Knolls 20% public park, Hidden Ponds about
20% of land in open space. The Village has established a rather
consistent approach to low density development which evaluates each
project separately, and considers the specific features of each site
as it relates to necessary Village open space requirements as well
as specific site conditions.
The old "5% park trick", which guided much of the existing single
family subdivision developments, has not produced the NEEDED open
space for those residents. The petition regarding park land presented
by the Eden View residents about Eden Farms' proposal points this out.
A critical NEED for family projects is close, usable, and flexible open
space, which can be publicly or privately owned and maintained.
I believe that single family homes on 13,500, 22,000, or 8,000 sq.ft.
lots deserve these needed open spaces as much ar more than townhouses
or apartment units and, therefore, the Creekwood single family plat
should provide such spaces.
BECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Recommend that the Creekwood Drive cul-de-sac be pulled back
up the hill at sufficient distance to allow the low areas to be
utilized as homeowner association OR public open space.
Development of this area should be a joint decision between Village
and developer.
2. Recommend that Creekwood Drive be altered so as to increase the
size of lots 4, 5, and 6. A variance may be required in the
standard lot size in these instances due to the parkway boundary.
3. Recommend to the watershed district that the 100' public boundary
along the creek be flexible if the previous recommendations are
followed to allow a boundary that fits the terrain.
4. Recommend rezoning to R1 13.5 for the Creelcwood subdivision if
the recommendations of the Staff Report are implemented. Approval
would require a substantial plan modification to be submitted to
the Planning Commission for review.
Planning Report - Creekwood Single Family Subdivision
Page Five
S. Recommend preliminary plat approval be given if t he resubmitted
Creekwood plan meets the recommendations of the Staff Report.
6. Recommend denial of the Creeicwood Estates subdivision as
submitted in the proposed plat of January, 1973, if it is not
modified to conform with the Staff Report's recommendations.
DP
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
MENEM cowry, MENNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 209
AN ORDINANCE RELATIIC TO ZONING
AND AMENDING ORDIRUCE NO. 135
BASSWOODS - SITE D2
The Council of the Village of Eden Prairie does ordain as follows:
Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is mended by adding to
Section 214, Township 116, Range 22 as follows:
Located on 14.7 acres, is bounded by the Collector Road to
the north end east in The Preserve on Government Dots 6 and
8 in Sectim 214, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County,
Minnesota. -----
RN 2.5
The first reading was held at a regular meeting of the Council of
the Village of Men Prairie, this 13th day of February and finally read,
adapted and ordered published at • regular meeting of the Council of
said Village on the day of 1973.
Paul R. Redpeth, Neyor
ATTEST:
SEAL
Edna 14. Holmgren, Clerk
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN cowry, MINNESOTA
REsowrioN NO. 648
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY
PLAT OF BASSWOODS, SITE D2
e
BE IT RESOLVED,by the Village Council of the Village of
Eden Prairie, Minnesota as follows:
The preliminary plat of Basswood, Site D2 is located on 4.7
acres bounded by the Collector Road to the north and east in The
Preserve on Government Lots 6 and 8 in Section 24, Township 116,
Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, is found to be in conformance
with the provisions of Eden Prairie Ordinance No. 93 (Subdivision
Ordinance) and all amendments thereto, and is therefore approved.
ADOPTED by the Village Council on February 13, 1973.
Paul. R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk
,
I;4y1 L1 1 t,7
C. Basswood, site d2, condominiums. Staff Report.
Architect Roger Freeburg brought the Commission up to date on the
changes made as outlined in the staff report.
Action Taken:
It was moved by Mr. Casey and seconded by Mrs. Schee to recommend
to the Council that the site d2 Basswoods condominium units be
approved for rezoning to MI 2.5 with the following stipulations:
1.That there be 35 units in the west building and 27 units in
the east building.
2.That trees to be retained in proximity to the construction
areas are tagged and adequate precautions are taken to insure
their preservation.
3.Landscaping shall be provided between the westerly edge of the
west building and the collector road with low level vegetation
and canopy trees. Likewise, around the perimeter adjacent to
the collector road, appropriate vegetation shall be provided to
complement the grade change from the road to the structure.
4.1hat the revised buildings be staked in the field and inspected
by the Village Staff to insure that the forest character is
preserved.
5.That driveways to the project be located to conform to the
Village Traffic safety standards.
flying the motion were Soderlind, Lynch, Teslow, Meyers, Casey, and
Schee; naying was Sorensen. Motion carricd.
ft
PLANNING STAFF REPORT
Date:
Project:
Request :
Location:
From:
Through:
February 15, 1973
Mark Z. Jones "Basswoods", site d2, condominium units.
RM 2.5 rezoning and development stage approval.
Preserve P.U.D. , the 76 acre Basswood development area.
Dick Putnam, Village Planner
Bob Heinrich, Village Manager
Planning Review Process:
Basswoods, site d2, was first presented to the Planning Commission on
January 2, 1973, by Mark Z. Jones Associates. At that meeting, there w
a
s
some doubt by the Commission that the building should be located as far
into the woods as indicated on the initial plan. Therefore, the Planning
S
t
a
f
f
asked Ivk. Les Blacklock, a naturalist, and selected landscape archite
c
t
s
t
o
examL-1 e the site to determine if the woods should be violated by such large
buildings, At the January 16, 1973, meeting, the Planning Staff reported that
the experts that examined those areas did not feel the buildings should b
e
constructed as indicated in the initial plan and at that time, Mark Z. J
o
n
e
s
presented an alternate scheme which moved the buildings back out of th
e
woods , still maintaining the 66 units. Review by the Park and Recreation
Commission on January 22 indicated the feeling that the buildings were
t
o
o
much into the woods. The Park and Recreation Commission also reviewed
t
h
e
project at its February 12th meeting, with the revised scheme which pu
l
l
e
d
t
h
e
buildings out of the woods. There were suggestions made by members
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
building may be turned in an "L" rather than straight to pull it out of th
e
w
o
o
d
s
even further.
A product of the Planning Commission's and Park and Recreation Commiss
i
o
n
'
s
review has produced an alternative by Mr. Roger Freeberg, the architect
f
o
r
Mark Z. Jones, that would drop four units, bringing the total to 62 units
,
a
n
d
would shorten the easterly building which is now in a straight line by app
r
o
x
i
-
mately 40 feet, pulling it almost entirely out of the woods. The revision
o
f
the plan during the planning review process has been initiated by the var
i
o
u
s
Village Commissions with the developer and architect being very coopera
t
i
v
e
in trying to achieve the most desirable plan for the site.
Site d2 Conformance with "Basswoods" Concept Plan:
The Basswoods Concept Plan which was approved late in 1972 indicated
7
0
units of condominiums desired on this site, of a building type that woul
d
b
e
a double-loaded corridor, underground parking structure. The process o
f
detailed design has indicated that the 70 units was not possible to fit th
e
site arid, therefore, the revised plan indicates approximately 62 units of
the same building type. The ability with the gabled roof and the varied
elevationsfrom two to three stories should add a lower scale to the rathe
r
large structures.
Basswoods, site d2
Page Two
The Basswoods plan indicated a trail system coming along the southeasterly
boundary of the d2 site, proceeding to the open wet area and then along the
southerly boundary going toward the elementary school site and crossing the
collector road. There would be minor paths feeding to the units themselves
from this major Preserve system. These linkages will be put in when the
structure is built, and the most appropriate path is determined.
Relationship with Adjacent Sites:
The revised plan which pulls the easterly building 40 feet further from the
southern property line will give a distance of approximately 65 feet from the
edge of the building to the property line. On site a2, directly adjacent, there
will be the cluster townhouses as proposed on site b with approximately 26
units proposed. The configuration of those units due to the steep slopes on
the northeastern corner of this site will dictate location away from the large
condominium building on site d2. The distance between these units will be
in excess of 100 feet. The 100 foot distance, given the character of the
land with steep slopes and heavy woods, will provide an excellent visual
buffer. There is approximately 120-130 feet from the building to the collector
road on the north, which should be sufficient. In that distance, there will be
parking and access to the underground garage.
The westerly building's relationship to the site b townhouse units has been
one of great concern throughout the planning of these sites. Originally the
distance between the large building and the townhouse was 55 feet, with
a Preserve pathway running between. This was felt to be tulsufficient
by the developer, architect, and Commission members. The revised plan
indicates a distance of over 100 feet between the buildings. This should
prove sufficient, given the dense forest for excellent visual buffering. Also
the pedestrian trail from the wet area to the school within this 100 foot
corridor should be well handled with those distances. The distances of 100
feet between structures within this wooded area seems to be the natural
buffering distance due to on-site inspection where, from the open field to
the low wet area is approximately 95-100 feet, even in the winter the dense
trees provide an excellent visual barrier given that much distance, and this
would seem to be the ideal distance within this site to provide the buffers
between uses.
The westerly building's relationship to the collector road is approximately
40 feet from the structure to the right-of-way line, with an elevation difference
of about 10 feet up with a two story facade facing the street. To accommodate
that relatively close distance to the street with the larger building, it seems
that some softening landscape; both lower-level trees as well as canopy
vegetation, should be utilized along the westerly edge of this site. This is
not indicated on the plan but would be suggested.
Basswoods, site d2
Page Three
Parking is provided on this site for approximately 24 guest spaces in front
of the units with the remaining parking under the building at a relationship
of approximately 11 spaces per unit. Provision of a 28 foot radius turnaround
will provide turnaround space as well as a dropoff area for the front door of
each unit. The turnaround area will also provide a nice entry feeling,
combined with the steps and heavy tree cover that exists by the westerly
building and the preservation of the trees on the east.
Building Relationship to Site - Natural Features:
The heavily wooded site with the very definite tree edge which has been cut
from a field with two high points of 916 and 913' offer an excellent opportunity
to site the buildings around these hill forms as well as putting units directly
in contact with the heavily wooded site. The concern expressed by the Village
and the developer has been the balance, or relationship, between the number
of units and the site with the placement of the buildings predominantly in the
open area. Revisions to the site plan have been centered around these basic
issues of balance between buildings and preservation of the natural site.
Both buildings will be sited high above the road approximately 10 to 12 feet
and will be opening out on the other side toward the woods at grade with
three story elevation. The minimizing of the tree damage and the maximizing
of the views for the units into the woods and of the overlook views to the north
toward the Anderson Lakes area is an ideal feature of this building type and the
site.
Recommendations:
1. Recommend to the Council that the site dl condominium units be approved
for rezoning to RM 2.5 in conformance with the revised plan to be submitted
indicating approximately 62 units for sale condominiums.
2. That trees to be retained in proximity to the construction areas are tagged
and adequate precautions are taken to insure their preservation.
3. Landscaping shall be provided between the westerly edge of the west building
and the collector road with low level vegetation and canopy trees. Likewise,
around the perimeter adjacent to the collector road, appropriate vegetation
shall be provided to complement the grade change from the road to the
structure.
4. That the revised buildings be staked in the field and inspected by the Village
Staff to insure that the forest character is preserved.
DP
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
IDENNEE3 COUNT, M3IGESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 6149
A RESOLUTION APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Village of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota that the Extension of Sanitary Sewer Along West 78th be
approved by petition as follows:
ECTENSION OF SANITARY SPIER ALONG WEST 78TH STREET
72-7•25
Extension of Sanitary Sewer along West 78th Street
tram Purgatory Creek to Rosemount Engineering Co.
and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice,
and Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and.
being fully advised of the pertinent facts does hereby determine to pro-
ceed with the construction fo said *rove:dents including all proceedings
which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary
easements and rights for construction and maintenance of such improvements;
that said improvements are hereby designated end shall be referred to in
all, subsequent proceedings as indicated above and the area to be special-1y
assessed for sanitary sewer shall include:
Section 10, Township 116, Range 22, Parcel 501:
Section 11, Township 116, Range 22, Parcels 6515, 3570, 3524, 3560,
3582 and 3590
Section 114, Township 116, Range 22, Parcels 8002, 8197, 8260, 8220
end 8230
Section 15, Township 116, Range 22, Parcels 520 end 6508.
ADOPTED by the Village Council on February 13, 1973.
Paul R. Rectpath, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
Edna N. Holmgren, Clerk
ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY STUDY
SANITARY SEWER EXTENSIONS
PROJECT NO. SAN 72-7-25
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
Wpkirla, 111 n 1111h01.1
gaylocd
tairmont
St. cloud
mastoid
icunton
badman. moonless
RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATES INC
January 4, 1973
Mr. Robert Heinrich, Village Manager
Village of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
RE: PRELIMINARY REPORT ON
SANITARY SEWER, DISTRICT CP-1
PROJECT 72-7-25
OUR FILE NO. 823K
Dear Mr. Heinrich,
Enclosed is our report on the proposed sanitary sewer required
to serve the area around Rosemount Engineering. The project
includes both trunk and lateral sewer and is estimated at
$212,600.00.
The lateral assessments for the bene fited property will depend
on the assessment policies adopted by the Village. We will
develop the necessary assessment figures for the hearing.
Please let us know if you need any additional information.
Yours vqry truly,
D011/pw
Enc.
ellitcc's
engineers
land surveyors
planners
mailing
Pots office box 130
'Napkin% mei mews 65343
loatIon
8700 west 36th street
eq. fouls park, minnesOts
612 935-6001
Delbort Ric La, L.S.
Robert Ca.,
Virgil Ms,itrrr. P.E.
Robert F4 obcvlson, P.E.
Mean D. 1-f :whom, A. A.
Cho les 13e.-sidr, P.E.
Staf ford Ti P.E.
Thdync Wit !cm, P.E.
Dev.a HJsby,
S. Tipton Grown,
Paul Marti nuan,P.E.
R. IV, Greenlet, P.E.
1ero.<1 L e ALA.
J. T. Aitken, ALA.
Wm. 11. Harsnemuth, A.I.A.
David 0. Husby, P.E.
RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATES, INC .
1
I - PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project consists of a sanitary sewer along West 78th Street from
Purgatory Creek to Rosemount Engineering Company. A portion of the proposed
sewer was designated as trunk sewer in the 1969 "Report on Trunk Sanitary
Sewer System" and was designed to serve an area referred to as CP-1.
The proposed project, as indicated on the attached map, connects to the ex-
isting interceptor sewer at Purgatory Creek and extends easterly along the
south side of 78th Street to its intersection with a future "ring road". It
then crosses 78th Street and continues easterly along the south side of State
Highway •5 to Foto Mark Inc. where it again turns south to 78th Street and the
entrance to Rosemount Engineering. An al ternate route which would parallel
the south side of 78th Street all the way appears to be a more direct route -
but was discarded because of the excessive depths which would be encountered.
II - DESIGN CRITERIA
The pipe is designed to carry the anticipated wastewater from Rosemount
Engineering, which has planned expansion to approximately 1100 employees,
and from Foto Mark with about 60 employees. A portion of the area to the south
will eventually be served by the trunk sewer via laterals along and parallel to
the ring road. The maximum areas anticipated, in addition to Rosemount and
Foto Mark, are approximately 100 acres of medium density housing and another
100 acres of the area referred to as the Regional Center northwest of
Highway #169.
2
It is possible that the entire area will not be served by the proposed trunk.
As the area develops, it may prove more feasible to serve portions of the area
from the interceptor to the west or from the Anderson Lake trunk to the
southeast. In that event, the trunk size could probably be decreased but
the gamble would not be worth the small savings in cost.
III - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
The proposed project consists of 16" pipe for the trunk sewer and 10" or 8"
for the portion considered as lateral sewer. Soil borings along the route
indicate areas of unsuitable soils, soft clay, peat and muck, which will
require the use of piling on most or all of the trunk line. The depth of
the pipe will generally be 10 feet or less although depths as high as 20 feet
will occasionally be encountered.
The 16" trunk sewer will be installed at minimum grade to maintain the lowest
elevation possible at the anticipated point of intersection with the ring
road from the south. This will result in a high degree of flexibility in
future lateral design and minimize the need for lift stations.
The 8" and 10" lines are designed to serve only the abutting property except
that a short section near Foto Mark will be lower than normal to provide
future service, if necessary, from the southeast.
IV - ESTIMATED COSTS
The estimated project costs for both lateral and trunk portions are as
follows:
LATERAL SYSTEM
3
QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL
130 IF 10" D.I.P. on piles (0-8') $ 25.00 $ 3,250.00
95 IF 10" " w " (8-10') 26.00 2,470.00
543 IF 10" Sewer Pipe (0-8 1 ). 8.50 4,615.50
840 LF 10" w w (8-10') 9.00 7,560.00
856 LF 10" is w (10-12') 9.50 8,132.00
340 LF 10" II H (12-14') 10.00 3,400.00
220 LF 10" II II (14-16') 1 1.00 2,420.00
105 IF 10" w w (16-18 1 ) 1 3.00 1,36500
55 IF 10" II II (18-20') 1 5.00 825.00
45 LF 10" ii II (20-22') 20.00 900.00
700 LF 8" w is (8-10 1 ) 6.00 4,200.00
12 EA Standard Manhole 4130.00 4,800.00
37 LF Extra Depth Itanhole 40.00 1,480.00
12 EA Double Pile Bents 300.00 3,600.00
1300 TON Pipe Stabilization Material 5.00 6,500.00
8 EA 10 x 6" Wye or Tee 1 7.00 136.00
2 EA 8 x 6" " ii 1 5.00 30.00
100 IF 6" Service Pipe 7.00 700.00
1 LS Landscaping 11,362.50 11 362.50
SUB TOTAL $67,746.00
Add 14% Engineering & 1.5% Administrative 10 454.00
$78,200.00
Add Capitalized Interest (7% for 9 months) 4,100.00
TOTAL LATERAL PROJECT $82,300.00
4
TRUNK SEWER
QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL
730 IF 16" D.I.P. on piles (0-8') $ 30.00 $21,900.00
395 IF 16" " " " (8-10' ) 31.00 12,245.00
395 IF 16" " (10-12') 33.00 13,035.00
230 IF 16" " " " (12-14') 35.00 8,050.00
6 EA Std. Manhole - 8' Deep 400.00 2,400.00
10 IF Extra Depth Manhole 40.00 400.00
98 EA Double Pile Bents 300.00 29,400.00
6 EA Quad. " " 600.00 3,600.00
4000 IF Extra Length Pile 3.50 14,000.00
200 TON Pipe Stabilization Nat'l 5.00 1 ,000 .00
1 IS Connect to 78" Interceptor 1,000.00 1,000.00
1 IS Landscaping 100.00 100.00
SUB TOTAL $107,130.00
Add 14% Engineering A 1.5% Administrative 16,670.00
$123,800.00
Add Capitalized Interest(71 for 9 months) 6,500.00
TOTAL TRUNK PROJECT
$130,300.00
The combined project cost for both trunk and lateral is estimated at $212,600.00.
1
I
1•111111111W1 — E XIS T IRO INTERCE01OR 'SEWER
— PROPOSED TRUNK SEW R
el 00000 Milt - PROPOSED LATPRAL SE t
27-
L4orofir....nriverii ovort7.0_,‹ tssezt
666 6
b
STREET
sssssss
r:
POW
(Eqoe)
(825o)
I
.1 TRUNK SANITARY SEWER
WEST 7•11° STREET AREA
IMPROVEMENT NO. SAN-7E- 7-2S
TABLE OF ESTIMATED LATERAL SEWER ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. SAN 72-7-25 Assessable Gross Area Front Assessable Area RECs at Unit Cost Total (Acres) Footage 300' Depth 2/Acre Per REC Assessment 44.77 995 6.85 acres 13.70 $ 1495 $ 20,500 Parcel No. Owner 8230, 8250, Rosemount 8260, 8220 8197 Kelly 8.84 335 2.31 4.62 6,900 6508, 8002 Feeders ,Daramec 69.58 2000 13.78 27.56 41,200 504 Minnesota Tree 2.77 900 * 2.77 5.54 8,280 6515 Ohman 9.45 1340 *8.37 16.74 25,000 3570, 3524 McDonald 1.44 150 1.03 2.00 31100 3560 Springer 1.32 142 0.98 1.96 2.900 3582, 3590 Foto Mark 4.40 940 * 4.10 8.20 12.200 TOTAL 80.38 $ 1495 $120,000 (Estimated Lateral cost) 520 Anderson 20.70 Assessable area to be determined before assessment hearing. *These are irregular shaped lots which do not have a full 300' width over the entire front footage. Where the width is less than 300', the actual area of the lot is used to determine number of RECs.
DATE: February 9, 1973
TO: Mayor and Members of Village Council
FROM: Village Manager R. P. Heinrich
SUBJECT: METHOD OF ASSESSING VACANT LAND FOR LATERAL
SEWER AND WATER BENEFIT
I and members of the staff, including consultant engineer Dave
Husby, met several time s and reviewed various methods of
assessing vacant properties for lateral benefit. The method
explained in Mr. Husby' s letter of 2/1/73 is recommended for
your consideration. The hearing is the improvement hearing --
not the assessment hearing -- so action by the Village Council
on the proposed assessing policy is not required until the
improvement is about to be assessed. The letter serves as a
point of reference for you on what properties would receive benefit
and the possible amount that may be assessed.
RPH:kg
ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY STUDY
WATER WORKS IMPROVEMENTS
IMPROVEMENTS NO. WTR 72-8-24
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
BLACK A VEATCH
Consulting Evineers
Nansas City, Missowei
Projeot No. 5171
BLACK & VEATCH
AREA CODE 816
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
TEL. 361.7000
MOO MEADOW LAKE PARKWAY
MmuNoMWMPESS, Poo. No. No
KANSAS CITY. MISSOURI SAMS
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
B&V Project 5171
Water Works Improvements
B&V File B
January 26,1973
• Mr. Robert P. Heinrich
Village Manager
The Village Hall
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Dear Mr. Heinrich:
In accordance with your request, we are submitting herewith our engineering
feasibility study concerning water service to the area around, and
including, Rosemount Engineering Company,
SCOPE
The purpose of this study is to determine the alignment, site, and cost
of the proposed lateral water main (Improvements No. WTR 72-8-24) which
is required to provide Village water aenvice to the area around, and
including, Rosemount Engineering Company, located on 78th Street approxi-
mately 2300 feet west of Flying Cloud Drive.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Village's present trunk water main system is being developed in accord-
ance with Stage I water works improvements of the Phase I Utility Proposal
adopted by the Village of Eden Prairie 131970. The majority of the
proposed Stage I trunk water main twromements west of the future "ring
road" have been constructed and are in service. Preliminary engineering
work for the remaining trunk water mains in Stage I has been completed.
Final plans and specifications for the proposed 16 inch trunk water main
(Improvements No. WTR 72-8-23) located along Flying Cloud Drive from the
entrance of the Preserve Development north to the south right-of-way of
Interstate Highway 494 have also been completed and are ready for the
receipt of construction bids. This 16 Inch main will provide trunkwatem
tfr. Itobert P. Heinrich
- 2 - January 26, 1973
service to areas along Flying Cloud Drive as well as service to lateral
water mains which will serve the proposed Hcoart Development in the
Preserve and the area around the Rosemount Engineering Company on 78th
Street. (See the attached project map.)
Alternative methods of serving the Rosemount area from the west by
extending the existing 16 inch trunk water main from the Public Works
building east along trunk Highway 5 and/or by constructing the proposed
16 inch trunk water main in the future "ring road" were explored; however,
both methods were found to be more coctly than serving the Rosemount area
from the proposed 16 inch trunk water main mentioned above. Another
alternative method was investigated to determine if it were feasible to
serve the Rosemount area from the north by extending the existing 16 inch
trunk main in Valley View Road east to Flying Cloud Drive and then south
along Flying Cloud Drive to 78th Street. This method was also found to
be more costly.
It is recommended that water service to the area along 78th Street, around
and including the Rosemount Engineering Company, be provided from a
lateral water main which will extend west approximately 2330 linear feet
from a connection to a proposed 16 Inch trunk water main (Improvements
No. VTIR 72-8-23) along Flying Cloud Drive. (See the attached project map.) It
is also recommended that the lateral main be constructed on the north side
of the right-of-way of 78th Street due to topography considerations.
CAPACITY
It is recommended that the proposed lateral water main to serve the
Rosemount area be 12 inches in size. The 12 inch main will be adequate
to provide dependable service to meet the maximum hour and fire demands
of the existing and future developments along 78th Street between the
Rosemount area and Flying Cloud Drive, provided that future developments
have similar water requirements as the existing developments in the area.
It is also recommended that, as new development occurs west of the Rose-
mount area, the 12 inch lateral water main be extended west to connect
with the proposed 16 inch trunk main in the future "ring road". A
connection to this trunk main will add to the reliability of the lateral
water main by providing two points of feed for the Rosemount area,
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
A subsurface investigation was conducted along the proposed alignment of
the lateral water main and it was found that the soil bearing capacity
is adequate to support the main. The main will have a minimum cover
depth of 7 •-6" and will be installed on Class C bedding.
Mr. Robert P. Heinrich 3 January 26, 1973
'The main will be Class 2 ductile iron pipe and it will be of the mechanical
joint and/or push-on joint type. Joint conductivity straps will be
Installed on the pipe to aid the customer in thawing out frozen service
connections.
Fire hydrants will be spaced along the main to provide maximum protection
to existing structures. Service connections will also be provided along
the pipe for each existing structure. Each service line from the service
connection will be extended to the property line of the structure being
served.
The lateral main terminates with a sectionalizing valve and a future
connection plug which will allow extension in the future of the lateral
main to the west with little, if any, disruption of service.
ESTIMATE OF COST
The unit price costs for the lateral water main project are shown in the
attached estimate. The estimate includes allowances for such price
increases as are indicated at the present time and are believed adequate
if the project is initiated within the next six months.
The estimate of cost does not include the cost of land or rights-of-way.
It does include engineering, administrative, legal, and interest costs.
FINANCIAL
The water main project described in this study is considered a lateral
main and, therefore, would be financed through assessments to the bene-
fited property owners. The mount of assessments will be determined by
the assessment policies of the Village.
Please contact us if additional information concerning the study is required.
Very truly yours,
BLACK & VEATCH
James L. Patton
.112 sv
January 26, 1973
p.
James L. Patton
Registration No. 9890
ESTIMATE OF COST
IMPROVEMENTS NO. WTR. 72-8-24
Location: West 78th Street - Flying Cloud Drive' West to Rosemount
Engineering Company
ESTIMATED
QUANTITIES MATERIAL
UNIT PRICE TOTAL
2;327 L/F 12" Water Main
12 LIP 6" Water Main
2 ea 12" Butterfly Line Valve
3 • ea 6" Gate Valve
3 ea 6" Fire Hydrant
2 es 1" Service Connection
2 ea 2" Service Connection
110 LIP 1" Service Piping
151 L/F 2" Service Piping
2 cu yd Miscellaneous Concrete
1,500 sq yd Gravel Pavement Replacement
120 sq yd Asphalt Pavement Replacement
@ 14.00
@ 8.00
@ 700.00
@ 140.00
@ 410.00
@ 75.00
@ 200.00
@ 5.00
@ 7.00
@ 65.00
2.50
@ 5.50
$32,578.00
96.00
1,400.00
420.00
1,230.00
150.00
400.00
550.00
1,057. 00
130.00
3,750.00
660.00
SUB-TOTAL: 842,421.00
ADD 11.5% ENGINEERING ------ - $ 4,878.00
$47,299.00
ADD 1.5% ADMINISTRATIVE MD LEGAL --------- $ 710.00
$48,009.00
ADD 6.6% INTEREST (For six months) $ 1,584.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST: ---------------- $49,593.00
I hereby certify that this Estimate of Cost was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I as a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
••-•••••• PROPOSED LATERAL
WATER MAIN
PROPOSED TRUNK
WATER MAIN
020)
12' LATERAL MAI N
WTR. 72-8-24
46" TRUNK MAIM
IMP. WTR. 724-23
LATERAL WATER NA IN
WEST 78th STREET AREA
IMPROVEMENT NO. VTR. 72441
k
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
7711 Country Club Drive
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427
February 22, 1973
Village of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Attn: Mr. Dick Putnam
Village Planner
Dear Dick:
The following is a review of
per your request of February 1
The soils in the area are for the most part medium to moderate
l
y
fine textured clayey soils that tends to be sticky when wet and
h
a
r
d
when dry. The soils have high moisture storage capacity and are
moderate to moderately slow in permeability. Water tends to dr
a
i
n
o
f
f
the surface to depressions rather than percolate through the so
i
l
.
Except for soils along the floodplain and low soils leading up
t
o
t
h
e
hills, bearing values and stability are expected to be adequate
.
H
i
g
h
foundation costs should not be expected. The fact that the soi
l
s
c
h
a
n
g
e
in volume with moisture change (shrink swell) and have perched s
e
a
s
o
n
a
l
watertables, must be considered in design. Foundation drainag
e
i
s
a
requirement on all the soils. The Cordova (Co), Dundas (Du) and
H
a
m
e
l
(Ha) need particular attention in terms of wetness.
The main consideration, on the si te, in my judgement, are the
s
t
e
e
p
slopes. The slope analysis map prepared by Bather Ringrose and
W
a
l
s
f
e
l
d
and the soil map prepared by the Soi 1 Conservation Service ind
i
c
a
t
e
extensive areas with slope gradients of more than 15%. While
i
t
c
a
n
n
o
t
be said that steep slopes cannot be developed (in this case we
e
x
p
e
c
t
t
h
e
soil to be fairly stable if they are developed) the risk of sig
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
land alteration is high. For this reason certain slope phases
o
f
t
h
e
soils on this site described in the 1969 Hennepin County Soil
S
u
r
v
e
y
,
a
r
e
rated as having severe limitations for development.
Some areas of steep slopes can no doubt be planned without und
u
e
l
a
n
d
alteration, but observation of development on similar steep la
n
d
s
i
n
t
h
e
Twin Cities Area indicate that many areas are likely to be hea
v
i
l
y
g
r
a
d
e
d
.
High quality construction standards need to be employed such as
n
o
t
c
h
i
n
g
buildings into hills rather than simply leveling the site.
It is difficult to know the extent of grading planned without
a site
and grading plan but it appears that extensive cutting and fi
l
l
i
n
g
w
i
l
l
Page 2
be necessary to prepare this site which would mean the potential for
sediment and water loss to downstream positions would be severe. The
energy status of the landscape to produce water runoff and erosion is
high.
Roads and buildings should be designed around the existing landscape
to minimize grading and other site preparation to reduce land alteration
and the potential for water runoff and sedimentation.
1. A number of temporary debris basins should be constructed near
the lower reaches of the small drainage ways on the tract. The
exact location and design of these can be determined when detailed
site plans are completed. The purpose of these structures is to
trap sediment and debris during the initial period of construction.
Maintain these basins by desilting them as necessary to obtain
optimum trap efficiency.
2. Storm drai nage facilities should be completed and made operational
as soon as possible during construction. Small debris guards
should be used to protect the storm drain inlets from blockage
during the construction period.
3. Complete construction of main street circling each cluster before
proceeding to grading for buildings.
4. Use incremental development rather than breaking up large tracts
of land simultaneously; this will help minimize the duration of
exposure of the land to erosion and will greatly reduce damages
during the construction period.
5. Top soil should be stockpiled and used later on areas to be
stabilized by permanent vegetation.
6. Exposed and eroding areas should be established in temporary
vegetation if such areas will not be built on within a period of
60 days. This seeding should be done immediately upon completion
of rough grading.
7. Mulch, temporary diversions, contour furrows, terraces and other
simple conservation practices should be used where appropriate for
erosion control.
8. Permanent vegetation should be established immediately upon
completion of final grading on all areas where this practice is
applicabl e.
In response to the question, "What will the densities proposed have upon
the recharge process?", we can only say that runoff will greatly increase
because of roofs, streets and parking areas. The affect on water levels
in the creek is also difficult to assess except to say that flood hazards
will probably increase, however hydrologic studies will be required to
ascertain this.
• rage 3
I am not sure if anyone can speak with real assurance on the signifi-
cance of the recharge process in this area. Some Geologists believe the
deep glacial debris in the area is fractured and that surface waters
contribute to deep bedrock aquifers. Actual data, I suspect, is difficult
to come by. We can expect, however, that with increased runoff the recharge
of the bedrock zones will be diminished.
It must be pointed out, that all developments are very likely to reduce
infiltration of water into the soil unless provisions are made to retard
runoff from the area. Even this may not increase or maintain former
recharge rates as artificial ponding sites are often impervious and most
of the stored water is dissipated by evaporation.
Regards,
Patrick N Kennedy
District Conservationist
/ma
Public Works Phone 935•3381 320 Washington Av. South, Hopkins, Minnesota 55343
HeNNePIN COUNTY
February 1, 1973
Mr. Richard Putnam
Village of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Dear Mr. Putnam:
RE: Proposed Plat - "Eden Farms"
CSAH 4 and CSAH 62
Hennepin County Plat No, 183
Review and Recommendations
Thank you for submitting the above referenced plat for our review. We have
reviewed the proposed plat and have the following recommendations:
1. Dedi cute an additional 10.0 feet of right of way - a total of 50.0
feet • along each side of the centerline of CSAH 4.
2. CSAH 62 - Crosstown - is, at present, proposed to be located along
the northerly boundary of the proposed plat. Right of way, varying
in width from approximately 100 feet to 300 feet in width, has been
acquired along the northerly side of Town Line Road by Hennepin County.
Addi tional right of way width will , however, be required along the
northerly boundary of the Eden Farms property when CSAH 62 is developed.
It i s recommended, at this time, that approximately 150 feet of width
along the northerly boundary of the plat be reserved and remain undevel-
oped for acquisition as CSAH 62 right of way in the future. There has
been no determination made as to the scheduling of the development of
CSAH 62 in the area of the proposed plat.
3. The proposed utilities along the existing Town Line Road (62nd Street)
should be located southerly outside the previously discussed reserved
right of way area.
4. The proposed streets which would connect to the existing Town Line Road
(62nd Street) should be located within the plat so that they are in-line
with existing streets northerly of Town Li ne Road, e.g., Woodland Road.
Very tr yours,
Mr. Richard Putnam - 2 February 1 , 1973
5. Access to all lots and/or development areas should be from the proposed
street rather than from CSAH 4 or from Town Line Road (62nd Street).
If access is desired from CSAH 4 it will be necessary to obtain Entrance
Permits from the Maintenance Section of the Hennepin County Department of
Public Works. An Entrance Permit will also be required for the proposed
relocation of Duck Lake Trail.
6. Any proposed construction or alterations within county rights of way must
be approved by the Hennepin County Department of Public Works.
If there are any questions please contact Craig D. Spencer at this office.
Herbert 0. Klossner, P.E.
County Engineer
HOK:CDS:rm
Yours truly,
7,77-aywsw.4
Samuel Fisher, Chief
Traffic Engineering Section
SF:pj
cc: Richard Wolsfeld
Craig Spencer
Dennis Hansen
p .
Public Works Phone 935-3381 320 Washington Av. South, Hopkins, Minnesota 55343
HeNNePIN COUNTY
January 22, 1973
Mr. Dick Putnam
Village of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Dear Mr. Putnam:
As requested by Mr. Richard P. Wolsfeld, Jr. of Bather-R
i
n
g
r
o
s
e
-
W
o
l
s
f
e
l
d
,
I
n
c
.
,
we have reviewed the proposed Eden Farms development w
i
t
h
r
e
s
p
e
c
t
t
o
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
CSAH 4. It should be pointed out that the statements m
a
d
e
i
n
t
h
i
s
l
e
t
t
e
r
a
r
e
being made prior to final review of the plat by the Coun
t
y
.
Although sight distance and traffic operation at the exi
s
t
i
n
g
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
CSAH 4 and Duck Lake Trail has not presented any problem
s
,
w
e
w
o
u
l
d
h
a
v
e
n
o
objection to its relocation as proposed by the developer
.
Further comments concerning the development will be ma
d
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
t
h
e
p
l
a
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION no. 664
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR HONART
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the Village of Eden
Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesota
THAT, approval be given Hosart Development Company PUT)
Concept Plan on approximately 100 acres bounded by West 78th Street
to the north, U. S. Highway 169/212 to the west and the proposed
Ring Route to the south and east for a proposed regional shopping
center.
THAT, approval be given based upon recommendations in
the Staff Report which is made a part hereof and marked Exhibit A.
THAT, it is located in the N 1/2 of the S 1/2 and Lots
13 and lit of Auditors Subdivision No. 335 of Section 14, Township
116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
ADOPTED by the Village Council on the 27th day of February,
1973.
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
Edna M. Holingren, Clerk
Homart's Request/Time Schedule:
A. The Village Council authorize the contract for consultant engineering
services for design, construction, and cost allocations for the Ring Route.
B. The Village Council authorize the Building Department Staff to issue
phased building permits if each phase has satisfied the Village Planning
Commission and Staff and Building Staff as well as the Uniform Building
Code requirements.
Elements of Major Center Area that influence Homed site:
A. Transportation
1. Recommend that a Southwest Sector Transportation Study be con-
ducted with the cooperation of various governmental agencies and
municipalities to examine all the road systems and evaluate the total
network. Transportation shall be defined to include all forms of
land-based movement.
2. The allocation of Ring Route construction cost shall be determined
by the Village Council, based upon consultation with the land owners
in the area, consultant Village engineering firm, and the staff research
regarding Fiscal Disparity legislation.
3. Recommend construction of the Ring Route from 494/West 713th Street
on the east to T.H. 45 on the west with an at-grade signalized inter-
section at that point.
4. Recommend upgrading of old 169/212 to four lanes with channelization
and signals from 212/494 ramps to its intersection with the southerly
leg of the Ring Route. Also, upgrading of the remainder of 169/2 12 to
Co. Rd. #1 to better serve the existing "Regional" uses.
5. Recommend construction by 1 975 of a temporary off-ramp from 494 to
existing 169 to accommodate the existing traffic generated by the
Vocational Technical School, Flying Cloud Airport, the Regional
Landfill, the future junior college, and Regional Shopping Nall.
B. Transit
1. The Village Council requests that the M.C.A. be redesignated as a
major metropolitan "transit node" to be served directly by the
fast link Metro System.
2. The provision of Activity Center Transit is proposed within the M.C.A.
to interface with the Metro System and development in the W.C.A.
3. Bus service should be provided to the Homart site by 1975 to serve
Eden Prairie and the retail center. Adequate walkway and waiting
facilities shall be designed into the Homart Mall.
Page Two
4. Encourage joint use of bus or transit facilities by the educational
institutions within the community.
5. Coordinate NI.C. A . transportation planning with Village and private/
quasi-public pedestrian walkway systems.
C. Pedestrians
1. Pedestrian movement is essential for the success of the "Town Center"
concept as well as the other transportation modes. Individual sites
within the M.C.A. will develop appropriate pedestrian connections
within the M.C.A. and provide links to the surrounding residential
areas.
2. The principles listed under the Pedestrian Systems section will be
used to evaluate and guide development.
D. Open Space/Impact Upon Environment
1. The preservation of Anderson Lakes as a Metropolitan Wildlife Park
must not be adversely affected by any element of the Homart Regional
Center or the related Major Center Area development.
2. Protection from urban encroachment of the Purgatory Creek Flood Plain
is necessary to maintain the flood plain storage, wildlife habitat,
water recharge capabilities, and significant visual openness.
3. The protection of Bryant and Smetana Lakes from pollution and overuse,
as well as the retention of the Nine Mile Creek Valley and related
marshes/flood plain in their natural state is required of all development
in the M.O . A.
4. Enhancement of the pond in the southwest quadrant of 494/212 inter-
change is required at such time as land is developed adjacent.
5. Require private developments in the M.C.A. to provide usable exterior
open space: plazas, parks, or preservation of significant natural
features, in all developments. Homart should include usable/public
Plaza areas • exclusive of the interior Mall,which relate to pedestrian
movement systems.
E. Public Utilities
1. Proper design of storm water runoff systems from the Homart site
shall be accomplished to comply with the Village and the two Water-
shed District's standards.
F. Physical Form
1. Flexibility in design and planning are encouraged to permit improved
systems in the M C .A.
Page Three
G. Community Impact
1. Recommend the "Town Center Concept" for the M.C.A. which will
provide the wide array of services necessary to a community.
2. Establish areas that serve the public for use of assembly, forums,
political events, etc.
3. Encourage, through planning, design, and management, strong
community identification with public and significant private facilities
within the M.C.A.
H. Economic Development Impact
1. Sharing of the regional tax base is an appropriate fiscal concept to
develop metropolitan and state taxation policies.
2. Costs to the local municipality, required to provide for the regionally
oriented uses, whose tax base is shared, should be shared by the
metropolitan or state government.
I. Homart as part of M.C.A.
1. The "tone" or "quality" of the M.C.A. will be established by Homart's
retail mall; therefore, excellence in all phases will be required of
Homart and subsequently of other development on their site.
100 Acre Homart Site Evaluation
A. Size
1. Recommend that a maximum of four department stores be planned for
Homart's center and that the total G.L.A. square footage be approxi-
mately 1 million.
B. Composition at Site
1. Recommend the development of a Community Commercial Center on
the 100+ acre Homan site that will comply with all the M.C.A. and
Homart planning and design standards.
2. Recommend that the entertainment, finance, office, and other appro-
priate uses be permitted on the 100 + acre Homart site, if they comply
with the standards established for the M.C.A.
3. The Village should insist upon clustering of related land uses to
achieve greatest efficienc y in transportation and pedestrian availability,
as well as visual appeal. Such clusters could be: financial centers,
food service, entertainment, office, cultural, etc.
4. The organization of future development parcels and uses within the
Homart site should be consistent with the principles of linking and
coordinating the entire southwest quadrant of the M.C.A. through
pedestrian, auto, and mechanized transit.
Page Four
5. Between the clusters of uses, there must be stimulating and exciting
spaces that will encourage people to utilize the pedestrian and
transit systems.
6. Require appropriate interim uses of the land within the Major Center
Area while waiting for development to occur.
C. Traffic
1. Recommend the use of the principles for the Homart site traffic
movement systems as proposed by Barton-Aschman, which utilize
minimum 150 foot entrance magazines, four lane interior perimeter
road, traffic signalization, and extensive lighting and landscaping.
2. Overloading local transportation systems should be minimized by
isolating the regional traffic from community and local road systems,
to provide for the safe and efficient movement of all levels of traffic.
D. Parking
1. Strongly endorse the concept of shared parking and require pedestrian
or transit links to enable joint u se.
2. Recommend the parking areas of the Homed Mall be divided in at
least four distinct levels to better fit the site.
3. Special landscaping, design, and maintenance will be required due
to the Minnesota climate.
4. Encourage the use of decked parking if economically feasible.
5. Recommend a ratio of 5.5 parking spaces to 1,000 sq.ft. G.L.A. be
used if adequate connections between other uses and parking areas
are provided.
E. Pedestrians and Transit
1. Recommend level separation between major pedestrian and major
vehicular routes.
2. Establish safe pedestrian connections to Anderson Lakes Park and
other adjacent parcels.
3. Establish enclosed pedestrian connections on major movement corridors
within the 100 acre liomart site.
4. Homan' s center will connect with major Village and M.C.A. pedestrian
systems; therefore, the Village Park and Recreation Commission should
work with Hornart to adequately size and locate the connections.
F. Existing Site Features and Landscaping
1. Preservation of the "Hill Form" on the Homart site Is mandatory.
2. All attempts should be made to save the existing grove of trees on
the site, thereby enhancing the mall and providing a significant
natural feature within the parking area which connects to Anderson
Lakes Park.
Page rive
3. Encroachment upon the Anderson Lakes Marsh shall be minimized
by locating the Ring Route as far west as practical. Development
on the Anderson Lakes Marsh east of the Ring Route shall be prohibited.
4. Encourage appropriate landscaping with plant material and earth
forms to enhance the views into the Homart site and out from the Mall.
G. Storm Water Systems
I. No adverse effects upon Anderson Lakes from storm water drainage
resulting from the center's construction and operation will be permitted.
H. Structural Character
1. The design and materials used for the shopping mall shall be appropriate
to the site features and to the basic design requirements of a Minnesota
climate.
2. Strongly endorse the two level mall concept proposed by Homart.
3. Coordinate the planning and design of the mall with the other buildings
on the site.
I. Specific Design
1. Recommend that Homan develop interior courts of sufficient size to
permit public assemblies for concerts, trade shows, etc.
2. Strongly endorse the use of exterior views and exterior plaza areas
that will function with the interior mall design.
3. Homart shall submit a proposal regarding control and requirements
of interior and exterior graphics acceptable to the Village.
4. The incorporation of numerous small scale, permanent seating areas
into the mall is essential.
J. Community Space
1. Community spaces shall be included in the Homart Mall. These areas
may be used for youth activities, shoppers lounge, Village Public
Safety Department office, merchant meetings, community meetings, etc_
K. Security
I. Additional police assistance costs provided by the Village for the
Homart Mall, over that normally provided businesses, shall be
assumed by the Mall management.
L. Intensity
1, Recommend that a clustered, compact approach be used for land
development in the M.C.A. and the Homart site to produce a human
scale, town center environment.
2. Establish policies and development procedures that will allow flexi-
bility, creative design, and construction to benefit the developer
and the Village, through innovative approaches to planning, zoning,
building permit evaluation, and site inspection.
Page Six
Procedures in Concept and Zoning Approval for Homart
I would submit that because of the constraints and the uniqueness of such
a project as the Homan Regional Center that the Planning Commission adopt
a policy that is specifically tailored to the center. Zoning of the actual mall
shopping center site, as well as specific development parcels, such as the
convenience center, office/banking site, could be accomplished through
the standard zoning procedure with contingencies and plan review required.
The zoning of the entire 100 acre site would not be necessary ; zoning only
the parcels for immediate development would be required. This would insure
that the Village Planning Commission and Council would have review responsi-
bilities and approval required to build any of the proposed structures on the
parcels.
Recommendations
1. P.U.D. Concept Plan approval be granted to the entire 100 acre plus
Homart Development Company site to be developed as a Regional Shopping
Mall with a four department store maximum, office, community commercial,
entertainment, finance , and transportation use proposal. Future
development may suggest new uses within the site and should be con-
sidered if appropriate to the regional center character.
2. The parcels indicated as "future development", office, and neighborhood
commercial, are not zoned until such time as a development plan is
submitted. However, the land uses of these parcels is granted in the
P.U.D. approval.
3. Zoning of C-Reg, is granted to Homart Development Company for the con-
struction of a Regional Shopping Center located south of the intersection
at West 78th Street and U.S. 212/169 used for construction of the mall,
maximum of four department stores, and parking. The zoning is granted
to Homart Development Company exclusively and is not transferable to
other developers for the mall, department stores, and parking.
4. The C-Reg. zoning is granted based upon approval of the specific site
and building plans for the mall, its related parking, and circulation systems.
The Staff Report dated December 29, 1972, raises many unresolved planning
and design considerations; these as well as others will be used to evaluate
Homart's final development plan. Final zoning approval will take into
consideration the economic concerns of the Village related to costs vs.
revenues and those of Homan, relative to site improvements and physical
construction cost.
Page Seven
5. Homart's C-Reg. zoning is granted with the stipulation that site work on
the center begin no later than May 1 , 1974. If the center is delayed
beyond that date, the C-Reg. zoning will revert back to Rural under The
Preserve P.U.D.
6. Concept Plan and Zoning Approval for the Homart site will be subject to
the policies and guidelines adopted by the Village Council that were
recommended by the Major Center Area Task Force, currently studying
the 1,000 acre Major Center Area.
7. The list of specific concerns regarding the initial site plan is recommended
as stipulations. These must be proven unfeasible or incorporated into
the final development plan for Homart.
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE LTO. 213
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO
ZONING AND AMEMING ORDINANCE
NO. 135 - ROMART DEVELOPMENT CO.
The Caoneil of the Village of Eden Prairie does ordain
as follows:
Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended by adding to
Section 14, Township 116, Range 22 as follows:
Approximately 100 acres bounded by West 78th Street to the
north, U. S. Highway 169/212 to the west and the proposed
Ring Route to the south and east located in the N 1/2 of the
S .:12 and Lots 13 and 1 1+ of Auditors Subdivision No. 335
of Section 1 14, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
The first reading was held at a regular meeting of the Council
oX the Village of Eden Prairie, thin 27th day of February, 1973 and finally
read, adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the Council of
said Village on the day of $ 1973.
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATAST:
SEAL
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk
1
Riley- Purgatory Creek Watershed District
8950 COUNTY ROAD P4
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55343
February 14, 1973
4344 IDS Center
Minneapolis, Minn. 554 02
335-9331
Mr. Robert T. Heinrich, Village Manager
Village of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Re: Open Space and Greenway Development
Studies - Purgatory Creek — Village
of Eden Prairie
Dear Mr. Heinrich:
At the last meeting of the Board of Managers of Riley-
Purgatory Creek Watershed District, the managers adopted a reso-
lution indicating their desire to participate with the Village
of Eden Prairie in making an appropriate study and report about •
the development of an open space and greenway system along
Purgatory Creek from the Minnesota River to the Mitchell Road
Crossing. The managers further indicated that they would be
willing to participate in such a study at a cost of $5,000 pro-
vided that the Village would also be willing to participate in
such a study and expend a similar amount.
The purpose of this letter is to advise you of such
action and ask that if you and the Village Council would be
interested in entering into such a cooperative program, to let
the district know accordingly, at which time further discussions
might be held to detail the basis upon which such a study should
go forward.
Please feel free to give me a call if you have any further
questions regarding the district's interest and willingness to
participate in such a program at this time.
Very truly yours,
/- r,u2i, 5, g__L 4 L.
Frederick S. Richards
Attorney for the District
FSR/nj
cc: All Managers
Mr. Allan Gebhard
DATE: February 23, 1973
TO: Mayor and Members of Village Council
Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District Board of Managers
Park and Recreation Commission
THROUGH: Village Manager Bob Heinrich t
FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: JOINT VENTURE PROPOSAL FOR OPEN SPACE PLANNING
ALONG PURGATORY CREEK
In October, 1972, a preliminary joint venture proposal was submitted by
the Village of Eden Prairie to the Riley—Purgatory Creek Watershed District
Board of Managers. The proposal outlined briefly the technique by which
the Village and the Watershed District would jointly participate in the
system planning of recreational and wildlife open space along Purgatory
Creek. The concept was for the two agencies to jointly finance the study
and to provide appropriate staff input into the process.
More specifically, we feel that the scope of the joint study ought to
include three main areas:
1. Management planning for the natural habitats and hydrologic
cycle of the creek.
2. Recreational planning for the use of these resources.
3. Interpretive planning for environmental education and leisure
education in the natural process
Management Planning
The management planning process would include an overview of the area by a consulting naturalist and some statements as to the valuable natural habitats
that exist along the creek today. It would also include hydrologic data completed
by the Watershed District, the delineation of flood plains and flood ways, and
would consider the overall Eden Prairie drainage plan which utilizes Purgatory
Creek as a major storm water runoff facility. The management planning would
take all of this information and develop a program by which the Village and the
Watershed District could insure the continued functioning of the creek to
meet these very worthwhile needs. This process would establish open space
boundaries necessary along the creek to continue the functioning of the
creekway for the functions previously mentioned. Management planning would
consider the types of land uses adjacent to the creek which would be
compatible with creek functioning. It would establish parameters within which
the recreational usage and environmental usage of the creek would be developed.
Recreational Planning
The recreational planning stage of the process would consider and develop
concept plans for the use of the land by the public in leisure pursuits. For
JOINT VENTURE PROPOSAL: PURGATORY CREEK
February 23, 1973
Page Two
the most part, this usage would no doubt be quite passive and would be
geared toward the viewing and related enjoyment from the natural features
of the creekway. The recreational planning stage would also consider
to some extent the impact of the Edenvale Golf Course on the Creek
and would deal with potential compatible uses with the management plan
in the Major Center school/park area. Recreational planning would identify
where pathways would be constructed along the creek and give some frame-
work upon which land developers could "tie in" to the creek system.
Interpretive Planning
The interpretive planning stage of the process would develop programs to
maximize the educational value of the creek system for school-age students
as well as the general public. The intent in this stage would be to provide
interpretive facilities along the creekway in areas where they would be most
appropriate and where they would be compatible with the management planning
done in the first stage of the process. It would not be the intent of the inter-
pretive planning stage at this point to develop specific site design standards,
but rather would indicate areas where interpretive programs would be appropriate
based on existing habitats and projected long-term usage planned adjacent
to the creek as well as access points for this purpose could easily be provided.
Summary:
The function of the Purgatory Creek Open Space System is generally
understood. For the most part, it would be one of passive recreation, taking
advantage of the unique natural features of the creekway. The Village would
initially prepare a development program for the consultant to use in the planning
process. Following the initial review of this program by the consultant,
representatives of the two agencies as well as interested citizens, landowners,
developers, and other appropriate staff would be called together to evaluate
the program and make additions or deletions as they seem appropriate. From
this information, the consultant would work through the three stage planning
process to develop an overall master plan for the Purgatory Creek Open Space
System and also prepare a report suggesting policies necessary to protect
the integrity of the system while providing appropriate recreational and
interpretive use of the area.
.Financing
The 1973 Program Budget included a proposal for approximately $25,000 for
park planning. This proposal was deleted from the Annual Budget with the
understanding that a specific proposal would be considered in 1973 to be
JOINT VENTURE PROPOSAL: PURGATORY CREEK
February 23, 1973
Page Three
financed out of the Reserve Fund. While this park was not specifica
l
l
y
listed in the 1973 Budget proposal, it is timely because of the imminen
c
e
of development in this area, particularly the Hustad Development Corp
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
Specific Planning Proposal
We're presently working with Brauer & Assoc. to develop the specific
proposal for the planning process. This proposal will be presented at
t
h
e
Council meeting on Tuesday for your consideration.
MJ:kg
'
'HENNEPIN COUNTY LEAGUE OF MUNICIPALITIES
3300 U NIVERSITY AVENUE S.E. MINNEAPOLIVAINNESOTA 55414
373-9992
February 20, 1973
To: Municipal tdministrators
From: Lori Chu
Re: Meeting with Chairman of the Transit Commission
The County Operations Commit tee will meet on February 28, 7:30 p.m. at
the Edina Village Hall. All municipal officials from Hennepin County
are invited to attend.
Doug Kelm, Chairman of the Metropolitan Transit Commission, will discuss
his agency's response to identified transportation needs:
Short-range accomplishments of the MTC's current bus improvement program.
The need for decisions nolo concerning note radical lonz-terra solutions,
in the of growing population treac's and the e.aerging energy crisis.
The MTC's proposed plan which "personalizes" transit service b,
utilizing different types of vehicles for a variety of trip needs.
The relationship between the HT 'a plan and the growth or outlying
major centers.
Costs
The response of other cities to the transportation probleal.
The status of current transit technology.
LC:nb
itIENNEPIN COUNTY LE,4GUE OF MUNICIPALITIES
3300 UNIVERSITY AVENUE S.E. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55414
373-9992
nE':11:!SOP
colorn Val ley 1:5113,;c: I, 1::117C ie 1, 1973 :00 p
V;F:::DA
1. Call to Order - Ed Hilde, Jr. President
2„ Short business meeting
3. Break into 17019,S1101 ,S
Libor Relations - Cy Smythe, Labor Relations Consultant
Legislative proposals and thei. mplications to taunicipal governmot
County/City Lita:aries/;.taflt. Reprwentutive Lon Hemits
'min.-sed state aid, restruett:rine, of the ;,ictropolitan Library
Service Agency, nod rerger of the 'Minneapolis and Hennepin systems
vousio.,; Authorities - roil Cohen, /.1,,yor - Brooklyn Center
The lions in problem itself, housing autho::itieo us the implementing
agency, and fouding
So.:,--aaLy of the discur,.r.
DATE: February 22, 1973
TO: Mayor and timbers of Village Council
THROUGH:
Vii la 9 e Mana9er Bob Heinrich
FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: PARK lONO FUND STATUS REPORT - LAND ACQUISITION
AND LAWCON GRANT STATUS
PARK BOND FUND
Attached is a financial report indicating the current status of the Eden Prairie
Park Bond Fund. It shows our current balance, those grants receivable as a
result of monies previously spent in land acqui sition authorized in our
1968, 1970, and 1 971 LAWCON, Granzs, plus money receivable from
tAe 1968
Hennepin County Lake Improvement ; Lind Grant.
The report also slands purchases payable, which are those parcels for whi
c
h
E
d
e
n
Prairie presentl y has cocci tment s to acquire either as a result of condemnati on
proceedings concl ut,A or underway, or purchase agreements, as is the case with
the Morley property, or negotiations vnich have been completed on the Bo
y
c
e
property and for which a recommendation to acquire is included for your
c
o
n
.
siderati on. Final y , the report shows grants receivable as a result of the
purchases payabl e,i.e., as soon as Eden Prairie spends money for the pu
r
p
o
s
e
of acquiring thi s land, we will be eligible to submit for reimbursement f
r
o
m
Federal and County grants previously authorized.
The resul tot balance in the Park Bond Fund is the net balance indicated at the
bottom of the fi rst page.
The second page shows those parcel s for which Eden Prairie has made fu
t
u
r
e
commitments to buy. By future commitments we mean options have been ta
k
e
n
on the Holasek property at Bryant Lake and the Blacklock and Brown properties
at Anderson Lakes. It is antici pa ted that the Village will receive 100%
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
for the Anderson Lakes parcels. We are also hopeful that 100% funding might be
secured for the Bryant Lake parcel s. We have made a request through the
Minnesota State Planning Agency to have both parks considered for 100%
S
t
a
t
e
Natural Resource Funding at the Legislative Advisory Committee meeting
c
o
m
i
n
g
up in March. We have also made application to the Hennepin County Lake
Improvement Fund for some $70,000 worth of lake improvement money to
a
s
s
i
s
t
us in the acqui si tion of the Bryant Lake parcel s. Upon receipt of not
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
of grant approval for the Bryant Lake and Anderson Lakes projects, fi
n
a
l
recommendations will be made to the Council to exercise the options o
r
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
modifications in the acquisitions pending.
The Village also has approximately $110,000 of additional grant reimbursement
forthcomi ng pending the resolution with the School District of the bou
n
d
a
r
y
of
parcels 2 and 3 at Round Lake. As you will recall, the School District purchased
that property and the Village pai d $78,000 to the District as their share of the
acquisi ti on, pending the resoluti on of the boundary between School and Park
property. That situation has not been taken care of to date and can perhaps be
done as a resul t of Phase 2 in the Joint School-Park Site Selection Study which
Don Rippel is currently working on. The 840,000+ is not shown in either of the
grants receivalble sections of the report.
PARK BOND FUND
Page 2
February 22, 1973
LAND ACQUISITION
The acquisi tion of all parcels for which Eden Prairie has received final
LAWCON approval has been completed and all are paid in full with the
exception of the "Purchases Payable" and Parcel Number 9 at Staring Lake.
That is the land owned by Mr. Grill. The size of the parcel has been
modified and thus we're awaiting new approval from LAWCON for the larger
parcel .
The acquisitions completed are al 1 of those at Round Lake Park (incl uding
the School/Village joint ownership and Savaryn condemnation); the acquisition
of all of the land at Staring Lake except parcels 3,6,9,12; orsd the acquisition
of all of the lari., west of Timber Trail in the "Rhino Head" .rea of Anderson
Lakes except the (i acklock property for uhich an option has been secured.
The Village present ly holds options to purchase all but parcel number 1
of the proposed ac(,ui si ti on at Bryant Lake.
LAWCON STATUS
Neither the Ander!, ,n Lakes Park LAWCON Contingency request nor the Bryant
Lake Park LAWCON on haw.: received final approval. Letters have been
sent to Senators ‘,0ndale and Humphrey, and Representative Frenzel requesting
their assistance in bringing about a speedy approval for both projects.
In the meantime, we've requested consideration be given to both projects at
the March Minnesota Legislative Advisory Committee Meeting. We've requested
100% State funding for both projects because of the development pressure
at Anderson Lakes and because of the chance that our short-teren options at
Bryant Lake will soon be expiring. We've also asked for advance funding
because of the large dollar amounts. If the requests are approved, Eden
Prairi e wit 1 have the cash to purchase both park areas irmiediately. Then
when and if LAWCON approval is received, the LAWCON monies will go back to the
State to reimmurse the National Resources Account rather than to Eden Prairie.
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
PARK BOND FUND - STATUS REPORT
February 20, 1973
I. Current Bala,
$ 44,000.00
V
II. Grants Receiv ole: $292,896.25
1968 LA.. ,ON
$1 10,943.7 5
1970 LA..;.3N
49,500.00
1971 Lii..*.;ON
94,790.00
1968 ct .. Lake Imp. 37,662.50
III. Purchases Pk.,,ole:
$519,062.50
Boyce
$120,000.00
Blesi
87,500.00
Bergin .'
24.550.00
Savaryn l
30,512.50
Nagengast2
100,000.00
Morley
150,500.00
IV. Grants Receivable for III. Above
3 :
$345,120.40
Federal
$238,781.25
County
106,339.15
V. Net Balance:
$162,954.15
condemnation award payable; 3/4 previously paid and 3/4 grant participation
included in grants receivable.
2 Presently in condemnation; $100,000 is estimated award.
3 Based on previously allocated funds for Boyce and 50% Federal participation
in condemnation awards; plus county funding of 62 14 of the local share
after Federal and State funding.
Park Bond Fund - Status Report
February 20, 1973
Page Two
VI. Future Commitgnents:
$1,265,230
Bryant Lake Options 4 $1,090,230
Anderson Lakes Options 175,000
VII. Grants Receivable for VI Above:
$1,265,2305
4
Estimate - Includes Cost of Parcel 1 for 'Mich no option
i
s
h
e
l
d
.
6 Estimate - Based on 100% Federal and State Funding.
DATE: February 20, 1973
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and Village Council Members
A N
Bob Heinrich, Village Manager
Marty lessen, Director of Parks and Recreation
RECOMMENDED PURCHASE OF JIM BOYCE AND
ED WOODY PROPERTY AT STARING LAKE FOR PARK
PURPOSES -- PARCEL 10
LOCATION: On the south side of Staring Lake between the Lake
and Flying Cloud Airport
AREA: 15.5 acres. The land slopes gradually up from the lake
on the south bluff overlooking Staring Lake. It contains
several mature specimen trees on the site.
OWNER: Jim Boyce and Ed Woody
ZONING: Open Space on the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The
present zoning is rural.
PROPOSED
USE: Public open space - a part of the major community park
surrounding Staring Lake.
APPRAISED
VALUE: Two appraisals have been completed on this property.
One ordered by the Village indicate s a market value of
$85,250 or $5,500 per acre. The other ordered by
Mr. Boyce and Mr. Woody indicate s a value of nearly
$8,000 per acre, or $120,000.
Value for tax purposes: (includes 30 acres plus the house)
1970 Market Value $ 87, 00 0
1972 Taxes 2,916.52
1972 Market Value 180,000
RECOMMENDED
PURCHASE: The Village may purchase the land for cash at a price of
$120,000. This parcel has been funded out of the 1971
LAWCON money for a lesser amount $80,000); however,
based on the appraisal completed at Mr. Boyce's request,
which reflects a value of $120,000 , and also based on
the recent condemnation award on the Blest property across
the lake from this parcel, the $120 ,000 price for this land
appears to be reasonable.
ET- 52,
February 20, 3973
Page Two
An attempt will be made to secure additional funding
from LAWCON and state sources to cover the increased
cost of this property.
MJ:kg
DATE: February 20, 1973
TO: Mayor and Village Council
Park and Recreation Commission
THROUGH: Bob Heinrich, Village Manager
FROM: Marty jessen, Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: CONDEMNATION AWARD ON THE GORDON BLESI
PROPERTY AT STARING LAKE -- PARCEL 7
The condemnation commission for the Blesi, Boyce, and Nagengast
properties has completed their hearings and filed an award for the
Blesi parcel. The amount of the award is:
Fee Award
$87,500
Appraisal Allowance
300
This parcel includes 10.591 acres plus a log cabin in good condition.
TheVillage had an appraisal done on the property that indicated a
value of $50,400. The landowner had an appraisal done which indicated
a value of $115,000. The value for tax purposes for 1973 is $75,900
LAWCON funding for one-half of an esttmpL1 value of $63,000 had
previously been approved. The Village seek a LAWCON contract
amendment to cover the Federal Share of the increased cost. General
l
y
the Federal Share is increased when the cost is increased as a resul
t
of a condemnation award.
Mj:kg
DATE: February 23, 1973
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
Mayor and Members of Village Cctuncil
Village Manager Bob Heinrich pN
Marty Jessen, Director of Parks and Recreation ti .
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR FUNDS TO SURVEY LAND ADJACENT TO
NINE MILE CREEK IN THE AREA OF THE RECENT PARK
DONATION FROM NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
As you all recall, in December, 1972, Northern States Power Company
donated 19.3 acres of land to the Village of Eden Prairie. This land is
just west of 1-494 along Nine Mile Creek. This donation came about as
a result of approximately one year's effort on the part of certain private
land ownors in that area working in conjunction with the Village Staff and
Northern States Power in an attempt to develop a creekway trail system/open
space plan in that area. Included among these land owners were Howard
and Barbara Kaerwer, the Presbyterian Church, and Russell Marsh.
Mr. Marsh has presented a development proposal for his land, which
identifies the creekway for dedication as public open space. The Kaerwer's
and Presbyterian Church representatives have indicated a willingness to
donate to the Village land owned by them in the Nine Mile Creek Flood Plain
area.
The only cost to the Village in acquiring these properties would be for surveys
necessary to provide proper legal descriptions of the properties. It is
estimated that survey costs for these two parcels would be approximately
$2,500.
By acquiring these two parcels, the Village would then have ownership to
all of the land along Nine Mile Creek between 494 and Baker Road. This
would provide the basis for outdoor education sites, conservation areas, and
also insure proper flood plain protection to insure the ability of Nine Mile
Creek to handle anticipated storm water runoff for regional flood periods.
The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board of Managers at their 2/21/73
meeting authorized their engineer to prepare a proposal for water quality
analysis of Bryant Lake and that part of the Nine Mile Creek leading into and
out of Bryant Lake. A subsequent proposal from the Village to conduct an
open space and conservation management program plan for Nine Mile Creek
would be appropriate. This would be envisioned as a joint venture similar
to the one being considered with the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District
along Purgatory Creek.
MJ:kg
011
•
CLERK'S LI.CENSE APPLICATION LIST
February 27, 1973
DANCE HALL (Approved by jack Hacking)
The Purple Barn — Richard L. Davis
SMALL KENNEL
H. W. Jenkins (Approved by Jack Hacking)
PLUMBING (Approved by inspections Dept.)
Consolidated Plumbing & Cooling Co. - 8. E. Enright
Chaska Plumbing gc Heating - Robert Favorite
Egan & Sons Plumbing Co. - W. J. Egan
Ely Plumbing & Heating Co. - Klaus N.i.eder
The General Plumbing Co. - Paul D. Stein
T. D. Gustafson Co, - Roy T. Gustafson
Raymond E. Haeg Plumbing - Raymond Hang
Loosen, Inc. - James A. Loosen
Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors, Inc. - Ken Gilbert
Mooney & Riddler Plumbing & Heating Co. - D. Ridler
patzko Plumbing 84 Heating Co. - Tom Matzko
national Plumbing & Heating Co. - Frank Hochstien
Axel Newman Heating & Plumbing Co. - Ben Vono
yinety-Fifth Street Plumbing - Jerome Haag
1/Chester Norman Plambin , - Chester Norman
Northtown Plumbing Co., Inc. - Thomas Veit
P & D Mechanical Contractors Co. - James R. Daugherty
Pokorney Plumbing Co. - Henry Pokorney
Richfield Plumbing - Robert Adelman
Southsicie Plumbing & Heating Co. - R. R. Johnstone
Southtown Plumbing, Inc. - Lavern Veit
Spring Plumbing Co., Inc. - Harbert Heintz
Standard Uniting & Appl. Co. - Julius 11. Klein
Superior Furnace Co. - D. 0. Hoglund
Surma Plumbing Co. - Frank Surma
Welter & Blaekloc-lc, Inc. - James J. Welter
Wenzel Plumbing & Heating, Inc. - Lawrence Wenzel
SEWAGE SYSTEM INSTALLER (Approved by Inspections Dept.)
Consolidated Plumbing & Heating, Co. - S. E. Enright
Coolbroth-Sitton septic Tanks - E. P. Coolbroth
Dakota-Minnesota Construction Co. - Gordon Bjornson
Dressel-Johnson Excavating - Aaron A. Johnson
T. D. Gustafson - Roy T. Gustafson
Raymond E. hang Plumbing - Raymond Haag
Loosen, Inc. - James A. Loosen
Axel Newman Heathig, & Plumbing Co. - Ben Vono
P & D Mechanical Contractors Co. - James R. Daugherty
Project Plumbing Co. - C. J. Nybo
Richfield Plumbing & Appl. Cu. - Robert Adelman
Spring Plumbing Co., Inc. - Harbert Heintz
Clerk's License Application List
February 27, 1973
Page Two
SEWAGE SYSTEM INSTALLER (Continued)
Suburban Sewer Service - Elwyn Williams
Superior Furnace Co. - D. 0. Hoglund
Surma Plumbing Co. - Frank Surma
West Suburban Utility Contractors, Inc. - Jack D. Van Romortel
UTILITY SERVICE INSTALLER (Approved by Inspections Dept.)
Dakota Minnesota Construction Co. - Gordon Bjornson
National Plumbing & Heating Co. - Frank Ilochstlen
Sullivan Septic Cervices, Inc. - P. S. Sullivan
Young America Plumbing Co. - Chuck Devorak
WATER SOribNERS (Approved by Inspections Dept.)
Canners Soft Water - John A. Commers
Culligan Soft Water - Robert J. Ford
Twin City Softener Service Co. - Bruce Anderson
GAS FITTERS (Approved by Inspections Dept.)
Ely Plumbing & Heating Co.- Klaus Rieder
Gas Supply, Inc. - S. R. Nauickas
Loosen, Inc. - James A. Loosen
Mill City Heating & Air Conditioning - Wm. Stevenson
Nielson Gas Heat - Stanley M. Nielson
Northern Propane Gas Co. - G. M. Colburn
P & D Mechanical Contracting Co. - James S. Daugherty
Geo. SedgIvick Heating & Air Conditioning - Stanley Snyder
Southside Plumbing & Heating - Robert Bd_egen
Superior Furnace Co. - Donald Hoglund
Thomas Air Conditioning Co. - Lynn Thomas
Ray N. Welter Heating Co. - Ray N. Welter, Jr.
Wenzel Plumbing & Heating Co. - Lawrence Wenzel
SCAVENGER (Approved by Inspections Dept. )
Suburban Sewer Service - Elwyn Williams
REFUSE & GARBAGE COLLECTION (Approved by Inspections Dept.)
Boyer Garbage Service - C. M. Moyer
WELL (Approved by Inspections Dept.)
Teuthner Well Co. - Maurice Leuthner
Don Rogers Well Co. - Don Rogers
it-ot-xt..7 4-2/
June 24, 1972
ESTIMATE OF COST
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
SUB-TRUNK SAN ITARY SEWER
IMPROVEMENT NO. SAN 72-1-12
NINE MILE ONE — A
LOCAT I ON: A portion of the North half of Section 3, Townshi p
116, Range 22, from Manhole No. 23 of Nine Mile One
Trunk Sanitary Sewer Northeasterly approximately
2,400 feet to Baker Road.
HEARING DATE: August 8, 1972
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $91,300.00
PROPOSED METHOD OF SUB-TRUNK ASSESSMENT:
ESTIMATED ASSESSABLE AREA: 61.68 acres
ESTIMATED ASSESSABLE COST PER ACRE: $1,480.22
Village of Eden Prairie
SANITARY SEWER
IMPROVEMENT NO. SAN 72-1-12
ESTIMATED UNIT
QUANTITIES UNIT MATERIAL PRICES TOTAL
Lump Sum Mobilization $3 ,000.00
Lump Sum Clearing & Grubbing 2 ,000.00
95 L.F. 8" Sewer (0-8') 10.00 950.00
733 L.F. 8" Sewer (8-10') 12.00 8,796.00
315 L.F. 8" Sewer (10-12') 15.00 4,725.00
1,025 L.F. 15" Sewer (0-8') 30.00 30 ,750.00
160 L.F. 15" Sewer (8-10') 32.00 5,120.00
40 L.F. 15" Sewer 10-12') 35.00 1 ,400.00
6 Each Standard Manholes 400.00 2 ,400.00
8 L.F. Manholes, Extra Depth 35.00 280.00
300 L.F. Class B Bedding 2.50 750.00
600 C. Y. Trench Stabilization Material 8.00 4,800.00
30 L.F. 8" stub 10.00 300.00
6 Acres Seeding 700.00 4,200.00
Lump Sum Easement Cost 4,200.00
SUB TOTAL $73,671.00
ADD Engineering and 1% administration 14,029.00
87 ,700.00
ADD Capitalized Interest (7% for 7 months) 3,600.00
$91,300.00
SANITARY SEWER
IMPROVEMENT NO.• SAN 72-1-U
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT
PARCEL OWNER
240 James F. Boyce
280 H. D. Brown, Jr.
615 Wm. J. Holasek
2632 American 011 Co.
2636 Richard D. Holasek
2640
Finneman Enterprises , Inc.
3810
Metram Properties, Inc.
5600
H. D. Brown, Jr.
TOTAL ASSESSABLE AREA
ASSESSABLE AREA
3.76 acres
8.35 acres
4.40 acres
10.80 acres
6.40 acres
18.90 acres
4.02 acres
5.05 acres
61.68 acres
REPORT ON BIDS RECEIVED
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT: NINE MILE ONE-A SUB-TRUNK
SANITARY SEWER
SAN 72-1-12
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 2 7 . 197 3
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT: Located in the North one-hal f of
Section 3 between the Nine Mile One
Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Baker Road
Brauer & Associates, Inc. were contracted by the Village of Eden
Prairie on June 26, 1972 to provide professional services necessary
for the design of Baker Road One Trunk Sanitary Sewer. The project
name was later changed to the Nine Mile One-A Sub-trunk Sanitary
Sewer.
Preliminary plans and cost estimate were prepared and presented to
the Council at the Public Hearing on August 8, 1972. See attached
cost estimate. Resolution No. 553 • to approve the project and
authorize preparation of plans and sped i ficati ons, was unanimously
approved by the Council.
Construction plans, specifications and contract documents were
subsequently prepared and submitted to the Village Engi neering
staff for approval. The project includes 8" and 15" sanitary
sewer and related appurtenances, clearing and grubbing, special
erosion control procedures for the Nine Mile Creek cros sing and
restoration.
The project was advertised February 8, 1 5 and 22.
Bids were opened on February 26, 1973 at 2:00 p.m. C. S. T.
Summary of Bids received:
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BASE BID
American Contracting
Orfei & Sons, Inc.
Northern Contracting
G. L. Contracting, Inc.
Nodland Associates, Inc.
McDonald & Associates, Inc.
Barbarossa 8, Sons, Inc.
Peter Lametti Construction Co.
143 .312.0 0
43,382.40
44.122.15*
47,181.50
49 .056.00
49 .794.00
61,390.00
68,370.30
ennis K. Trisitr,
February 26, 1973
dbx
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BASE BID
Widmer Bros. Inc.
$79 ,164.O0
Richard Knutson, Inc.
80,216.00
C. S. McCrossan, Inc.
97,296.00
*Error found in audit corrected by the Engineer.
ENGINEER'S REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The above bids have been audited by the Engineer for
a
c
c
u
r
a
c
y
of totals and reviewed for "reasonableness" of uni
t
p
r
i
c
e
s
.
T
h
e
bids were very competitive resulting in a very low p
r
o
j
e
c
t
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
-
tion cost.
The Engineer recommends that this work be awarded t
o
t
h
e
a
p
p
a
r
e
n
t
low bidder, American Contracting Corporation, for
t
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
$43,312.00.
ASSESSMENT OF PROJECT COSTS
Construction and other costs associated with this P
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
be assessed to the property owners as indicated on
t
h
e
a
t
t
a
c
h
e
d
list.
Submitted by:
TO; Robert P. Heinrich, Village Manager
FM: John D. Frane, Finance Director
DATE: February 23, 1973
RE: Vouchers to be presented for approval at the 2/27/73 meeting.
Metro Center, $135.00. Globe Trotter tickets have been paid
for by participants.
i1551 McDonald &Assoc., $15,226.40. Estimate No. 4 on our 1972 trunk
water project. The project is now 100% cceplete with $1,000
being retained.
February 27, 1973
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows:
Year - 1973
Date Voucher# Name Item Amount
114-42 Cancelled Not Replaced
(3.50)
1352 Cancelled
Replaced by 1498
(102.08)
2/12 1478 Federal Reserve Bank Payroll Taxes 2/12/73 1,816.90
2/13 14-79 Bruce Wojack Dues-Minn.Police & Peace Off. 3.00
2/16 1480 State of Minnesota Criminal Code Booklets 9.00
14-81 Met Center Tickets to Globe Trotters
Rec. Program 135.00
2/21 14-82 Metro Sewer Board Sewer Services Charges 642.08
1)4.83 Postmaster Postage for Meter 500.00
14-84 Minn. Chiefs of Police Dues - Jack Hacking 10.00
2/22 11485 Community Leadership
Clinics Tuition - Liaison School 20.00
Keith Wall
2/27 14-86 A & H Welding & Mfg, Machinery Repairs 11.00
14-87 B & C Floor Covering Village Hall Maintenance 6.45
14-88 Bituminous Roadways, Inc. Road Material 29.30
14-89 Sue Bjorken Figure Skating Instruction 108.00
111.90 Bill Blake Dues - Minn. Police & Peace Off. 3.00
14-91 Brauer & Associates Used Office Furniture 12 5(17.00
14-92 Robert J. Buresh Consulting Fee - Fire Zone &
Building Code Requirements
Hanart Shopping Center 110.00
11493 Void Replaced by 1494
14-94 Business Furniture Office Furniture for Secy. 420.00
14 95 Cargill, Inc. Salt 225.94
1)1-96 Kenneth W. Chambers January Mileage 50.00
11497 Chrysler City, Inc. Supplies - Public Safety Autos 18.45
114-98 Dalco Maintenace Supplies, Maint. Bldg. 58-15
111-99 Dorholt Printing & Stat. Office Supplies 81.19
1500 Eden Prairie Schools Office Supplies - Hall Maintenance
Supplies 119.60
1501 Barbara Eigen Refund-Guitar Lessons 15.75
1502 Ralph W. Emerson Refund - Gopher Hockey Game 3.00
1503 Fire Chief Magazine Suscription 7.50
15011 Glen Lake Drug Film for Assessing Dept. 9.00
1505 Gunnar Electric Electric work on annex 553.90
1506 Jack Hacking January Expenses 30-66
1507 Mary Hargens Expenses - Boy's & Gir' s Rec.Club 3.20
1508 Henn. Cty. Children's Fund-Bench Book Payment 10.00
1509 Hennepin County Commodities for Public Safety Dept. 111.07
Claims for Payment
February 27, 1973
Page Two
Date Voucher#
Name Item Amotmt
rye
Ski Lessons
Public Safety equipment
Topog Map
Maintenance Agreement on
Typewriters
Refund-Snowmobile Repair &
Maintenance
Repair & Maintenance Supplies
Supplies for Public Safety
Refund-Snowmobile Repair &
Maintenance
Ad - Engineer
Consultation - Forestry
Board & Room - Prisoner
Service, Fire Hall-Maint. Bldg.
& V. Hall
Supplies for Fire Dept. &
Public Safety
Service at Round Lake
Membership dues for R. Earls
Repairs - Public Safety
Repairs - Road Equipment
Street Material (sand)
Electric
Supplies for Public Safety 35.00
Legal for December & January 2,458.91
Postage Meter rental 27.00
Supplies for Public Safety 115.82
Tiny Tots Instruction 3.00
late payment fee 5.20
Service - Public Safety 1.75
Service at Forest Hills & Round
Lake Parks 120.00
Calculator Maintenance Agreement 78.50
Oil 71.80
Excavation Inspection - Mitchell
Heights Subtrunk 98 .50
Legals, December & January 370.58
Diesel 27.56
Replaced by 1543
Public Safety Dept. Supplies 183.15
Meters & Accessories 3,775.68
Replaced by 046
Rental & Supplies 311.86
Repair Parts 75.70
Village Hall Annex Material 2146.98
Liability Insurance 150.00
2/27 1510 Hennepin County Park Rese
District
1531 HiLlcrest Safety Equip.
1512 Mark Hurd Aerial
1513 IBM
1514 Tim Johnson
1515 Kraemer's
1516 K & W Sales Co.
1517 Willard Lienemann
1518 McGraw-Hill Publishing
1519 Robert M. McGuire
1520 City of Minneapolis
1521 Minneapolis Gas Co.
1522 Minnesota Fire, Inc.
1523 Minn. Natural Gas
1524 Minn. Street Supt. Assoc .
1525 Modern Tire Co.
1526 Motor Parts
1527 Win. Mueller & Sons
1528 Northern States Power
1529 Northwest Emergency
Equipment Co.
1530 Perbix, Harvey & Simons
1531 Pitney Bowes
1532 Power Brake & Equip.
1533 Linda Pratt
1534 PERA
1535 Ric's Hopkins Car Wash
1536 Satellite Industries
1537 Singer Business Mach.
1538 W. Gordon Smith Co.
1539 soil Engineering
1540 Sun Newspapers
1541 Sun Oil Co.
1542 Void
03 Uniforms Unlimited, Inc.
1544 Water Products Co.
05 Void
106 Xerox Corp.
1547 Ziegler, Inc.
1548 Frontier Lumber
1549 Roger Hennessy Agency
187.00
23.85
752.67
1/47.10
5.00
76.36
14.50
10.00
21.60
106.25
156.00
5149.18
97.25
20.70
5.00
1440.22
1.91
396.96
1,645.63
Claims for Payment
February 27, 1973
Page Three
Date Voucher#
Name Item Mount
2127 1550 Lampert Building Center
1551 McDonald & Assoc.
1552 Modern Floors, Inc.
1553 The Wall Street Journal
Village Hall Annex Material
Trunk Water Mains
Village Hall Annex Carpeting
Subscription for 1 year
1,876.19
15,226.40
280.55
35.00
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS..............