HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 01/09/1973 EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL
Tuesday, January 9, 1973 7:30 P.M., Village Hall
INVOCATION -- PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE--ROLL CALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Paul Redpath, John McCulloch, Jcan Meyers,
John Cosmano, and Wolfgang Penzel _
COUNCIL STAFF: Village Manager Robert P. Heinrich; Village
Attorney Harlan Perbix;Clerk Edna Holmgren
AGENDA
I. MINUTES OF DECEMBER 26, 1972, MEETING
II. OATH OF OFFICE: Councilman Wolfgang Penzel
III. ELECTION OF ACTING MAYOR
IV. OFFICIAL DESIGNATIONS
A. 1973 Meeting Dates and Times -Resolution No. 626.
B. Official Publication -Resolution No. 627.
C. Official Depository for Village Funds - Resolution No. 628.
D. Investment Authorization- Resolution No. 629.
E. Signatory Authorization- Resolution No. 630.
F. Facsimile Signatory Authorization- Resolution No. 631.
G. Authorization to appropriate Federal Revenue Sharing for Public
Safety Purposes - Resolution No. 632.
V. APPOINTMENTS (Attachments)
A. Suburban Rate Authority- Director and Alternate Director. Resolution
No. 633. Appointments by Council.
B. Hennepin County League of Municipalities. Representative and
Alternates. Appointments by Council.
C. Park and Recreation Commission. Two Appointments for Three Year
Term Plus Council Representative. Appointments by Mayor with
Consent of Council.
D. Planning Commission. Two Appointments for Three Year Terms Plus
Council Representative. Appointments by Mayor with Consent of
Council.
E. Human Rights Commission. Three Appointments for Three Year Terms
Plus Council Representative. Appointments by Mayor with Consent
of Council.
F. South Hennepin Human Services Planning Board Appointment of Two
presentatives. Appointment by Council.
G. Board of Appeals. Five Appointments for One Year Terms, Appointments
by Mayor with Consent of Council.
H. Village Attorney. Appointment by Manager Subject to the Approval of
the Council.
Council Agenda
January 9, 1973
Page Two
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. McAllister Properties, Anderson Lakes Planned Unit Development.
(Report Attached)
Action: Motion approving McAllister Properties, Anderson Lakes Planned
Unit Development Concept Plan as submitted in the brochure, based
on terraced style unit with a maximum number of 162 units and
with construction to begin within one year.
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. Letter from Warren Myers, President- Snowdrifters, Inc. dated
12/22/72 offering their services to the Village. (Attached)
Action: Receive and file.
Vtt[. E_ESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
A. Resolution No. 634 authorizing Mayor and Village Manager to execute
agreement with Shelter Development Corporation providing for the
Briarhill apartment project to be assessed at twenty percent (20%) of the
market value rather than five percent (5%).
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 634.
I
B. Resolution No. 635. authorizing Mayor and Village Manager to execute
agreement with Minneapolis Chapter of the American Institute of
Architects providing for the Windslope apartment project to be assessed
at twenty percent (20%)of the market value rather than five percent (5%).
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 635.
C. Resolution No. 636 authorizing approval of contract with Suburban
Hennepin County Relief Board for administration and supervision of
poor relief during 1973. (Attached)
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 636.
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS—AND COMMISSIONS
A. Manager's Reports:
1. 1973 Employee Compensation Program. Resolution No. 620. (Report
attached)
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 520, 1973 Employee Compensation
Program, as set forth in memo dated 12/22/72.
•-'Y .
Council Agenda
January 9, 1973
Page Three
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS. BOARDS AND COMMISSIONSJJgutinued)
A. Manager's Reports (continued)
2. sent Pre ation_ofJngineeringfeasibility report for the extension of
sanitary sewer along West 78th Street from Purgator Cr y eek to —
Rosemount Engineering Company. (Attached)
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 637 setting a Hearing for the
proposed improvement project for 7:30 p.m. on February 13,1973.
3. Consideration of Task Force recommendation for Community Education
Program. (Attached;-recommendation and Community Education
Coordinator Job Description)
Action: Motion endorsing Community Education Program as recommended
by Task Force.
4. Acceotance of certain lands from Northern States Power Company
adlacent to 494 north of Topview Acres and along Nine Mile Creek.
Action: Motion accepting certain lands from Northern States Power Co.
adjacent to 494 north of Topview Acres and along Nine Mile Creek.
X. BIDS
A. Award bid for 5/8" x 3/4" size meter (meter for single family dwellings)
to Water Products Company for the Rockwell Meter In the amount of
S38.77. (Report attached)
Action: Motion accepting Water Products Company bid.
XI. FINANCES
A. Payment of Claims No. 1203 to 1250. (Attached)
Action: Motion approving payment of Claims No. 1203 to 1250.
B. Cash and Investment Report.
Action: Motion accepting Cash and Investment Report.
XII. ADJOURNMENT.
MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL
Tuesday, December 12, 1972 7:30 P.M., Village Hall
Members present were: Mayor Paul R. Redpath, Councilmen Nesbitt,
Cosman6 and McCulloch and Councilwoman Joan Meyers. Also present
was Village Manager, Robert P. Heinrich, Village Attorney W. Harlan
Perbix and Clerk, Edna M. Holmgren.
I. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 28, 1972.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to approve the minutes of November
28th as published. Mr. Cosmano seconded. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Ecklund &Swedlund, P.U.D. - Hidden Ponds - Resolution No. 617.
Reclassification Rural District to Rl 13.5 - Ordinance No. 196,
First Reading. Preliminary Plat Approval - Resolution No. ((13.
The Village Manager reviewed the proposed Ecklund & Swedlund Hidden
Ponds Development. It is proposed for 150 acres of land to be dev-
eloped as public open space, quasi-public open space, 11 13.5 single
family lots. Preliminary Plat approval is being requested for the
1st Addition yet this year,plans for the 2nd addition are for next
spring and the 3rd addition sometime during the summer of 1973. Mr.
Heinrich then reviewed page 4 of the Planning Staff Report dated
December 5, 1972. The overall concept plan indicates agreement with
the uses proposed and the idea of preservation of the lowland wooded
areas. Approval of the concept plan does not approve the exact align-
ment of streets nor the platting of lots. These alignments will be
determined as each phase is developed. The 1st Phase, 43.7 acres in
area does respond to the changes requested by the Park& Recreation
Commission and the Planning Staff. The 60 foot right-of-way along
the southerly boundary of the 1st Phase will be utilized for the
extension of Valley View Road for a proposed east/west collector
street. Likewise, the platting of Outlot 3 leaves the opportunity
for alignment if necessary of the north/south street in the future.
It is anticipated that most of the lots would utilize Duck Lake Trail.
The construction of three ponds indicated and public/quasi-Public
trails will be at the developer's expense. He noted that many of the
lots are on cul-de-sac streets and the lots not on cul-de-sac streets
are on curved streets of short length. Dick Knutson, McCombs-Knutson
Associates also reviewed the plat plans for the Council. He stated
that Ecklund & Swedlund was just requesting preliminary plat approval
at this time in order to get financial backing instigated. Mrs. Meyers
questioned the street opening on Duck Lake Trail instead of on the
east/west collector. Mr. Swedlund replied that the route was an
unknown factor as of now and that he felt that Phase I would not
create a traffic problem. kr. McCulloch questioned where the utilit-
ies would connect. Mr. Heinrich stated that it would not create a
problem, that they would come from Duck Lake Trail. Mr. Loren Irvine,
Lotus View Drive stated that he was concerned about plans for utilit-
ies in Phase III of Hidden Ponds. He stated that he had purchased
property in the area and needed an answer. The Manager stated that
Council Meeting
December 12, 1972
Page Two
there were no plans for the area but that a special meeting was being
held on December 18th to discuss the whole Huck Lake Area and utility
plans would be taken into consideration on lend use plans for the
entire area. Mr. Irvine also stated that he was concerned about
trail systems through his property. The Manager replied that no final —
plans had been made and that this would be another item discussed
at this area wide meeting on the 18th. Mrs. Meyers questioned what
were the plans beyond a dead end street in Phase I. Mr. Knutson
replied that they had been requested by the Village Planner to lay out
the general area in September and that it had been done. The Manager
stated that he will get a report to the Council on sewer and water
projections at their December 26th meeting. The Manager informed the
Council that the Planning &Zoning and Park& Recreation Commissions
had approved the PUD with pending amendments in regard to Village road
alignments and park areas.
There being no further questions and/or comments Mr. Nesbitt made a
motion to close the hearing and adopt Resolution No. 617 approving
the Hidden Ponds PUD Concept Plan with pending amendments. Mr.
McCulloch seconded. All voted Nye. Motion carried.
A motion was made by Mr. Cosmano to adopt the first reading of Ord-
inance No. 196 reclassifying from Rural District to R1 13.5 pending
recommended changes from the Planning & Zoning Commission. Mr. Nesbitt
seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
A motion was made by Mr. Cosmano to adopt Resolution No. 613 approving
the Preliminary Plat of Hidden Ponds, Phase I with Planning and Zon-
ing Commission option to amend after the December 18th meeting with
residents. Mr. Nesbitt seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
B. Edenvale 4th Addition. Preliminary Plat Approval, Resolution
No. 61E3.
Don Peterson presented and reviewed the request for preliminary plat
approval of Edenvale 4th Addition. This plat is for land east of
Valley View/Mitchell Roads intersection of 56-62 acres encompassing
four land uses; C-Comm-Community Commercial; M3 - Multiple Residen-
tial at a maximum density of 22.6 on 23.18 acres; public parkland on
Outlot A, 2.34 acres, Outlot B portions of which are public parkway
along Purgatory Creek and the remainder near Mitchell Road is C-Comm.
and the rights-of-way for Valley View and Mitchell Road. Outlot B
along Purgatory Creek will be divided into two lots; the westerly
lot along Mitchell Road would have access from Mitchell near the
Creek and is being considered for a dental/medical building and the
eastern part of Outlot B would be open space from the Creek to Lot 1
boundary.
After discussion with Er. Peterson and the Council, Mr. Nesbitt made
a motion to close the hearing and adopt Resolution No. 618 approving
the preliminary plat of Edenvale 4th Addition. Mrs. Meyers seconded.
Al]. voted aye. Motion carried.
Council Meeting
December 12, 1972
Page Three
III. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request of Minnesota Department of Highways for Sewer and Water
Service to Proposed Minnesota Maintenance Storage Building.
A motion was made by Mr. Nesbitt to receive and file the request for
sewer and water utilities to the proposed Minnesota Maintenance Stor-
age Building. Mr. Cosmano seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
B. Letter from Minnesota State Planning Agency, Office of Local &
Urban Affairs, Concerning LAWCON Application - Bryant Lake Park.
C. Letter from Minnesota State Planning Agency, Office of Local &
Urban Affairs, Concerning LAWCON Application - Staring Lake Park,
Phase IV.
A motion was made by Mr. Nesbitt to receive and place on file, letters
dated November 30th and December 1st from the Office of Local & Urban
Affair in regard to LAWCON applications for Bryant Lake Park and
Staring Lake Park. Mr. Cosmano seconded. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
IV. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
A. Creating Department of Public Safety, Ordinance No. 197.
First Reading.
A motion was made by Mr. McCulloch to adopt the first reading of
Ordinance No. 197. Mrs. Meyers seconded. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
B. Resolution No. 614. Approving Mutual Aid Agreement for Police
Assistance.
1. A motion was made by Mr. Nesbitt to adopt Resolution No. 614
approving Mutual Aid for Police Assistance authorizing the Mayor
and Manager to sign the agreement. Mr. Cosmano seconded. All voted
eye. Motion carried.
2. A motion eras made by Mr. Nesbitt that the Village designate
the Village Manager and the Director of Public Safety as responding
and requesting officials with regard to Resolution No. 614. Mr.
Cosmano seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
C. Resolution No. 615. Authorizing the Acquisition, Construction
and Leasing of a Project Under the Minnesota Municipal Industrial
Development Act and the Sale and Issuance of Industrial Develop-
sent Revenue Bonds to Finance the Project, Secured by a Pledge
and Aesigtusent of the Revenues Thereof and a Mortgage of the
Project to a Trustee.
A motion was made by Mr. McCulloch to adopt Resolution No. 615. Nrs•
Meyers seconded. On roll call, all voted aye. Motion carried.
Council Meeting
December 12, 1972
Page Four
D. Ordinance No. 178. Second Reading. Landscape Ordinance.
A motion was made by Mrs. beyers to adopt the second reading of
Ordinance No. 173 and order published with the following correction:
Section I (c) The provision of this section shall apply to all
zoning districts with the exception of R1 single family. —
With this correction, Mr. Cosmetic) seconded. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
E. Ordinance No. 195. Second Reading. Repealing Ordinance No. 167.
Creating an Escrow Account for Construction of Sanitary Sewer
Laterals.
A motion was made by Mr. Cosmano to adopt the second reading of
Ordinance No. 195 and order published. Mrs. Meyers seconded. All
voted eye. Motion carried.
F. Ordinance No. 198. First Reading. Regulating and Licensing
Scavengers, Requiring Permits and Imposing Penalty.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to adopt the first reading of
Ordinance No. 198 as corrected. Mr. McCulloch seconded. All voted
aye. Motion carried.
G. Ordinance No. 199. First Reading. Amending Ordinance No. 34.
Individual Sewage Systems and Installers.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to adopt the first reading of
Ordinance No. 199 as amended. Mr. Nesbitt seconded. All voted eye.
Motion carried.
H. Ordinance No. 200. First Reading. Amending Ordinance No. 156.
Licensing Contractors of 1 and 2 Family Dwellings.
A motion was made by Mr. Cosmanc to adopt the first reading of
Ordinance No. 200 with amendments. Mrs. Meyers seconded. All voted
Aye. Motion carried.
I. Ordinance No. 201, First Reading. Amending Ordinance No. 157.
Water Softening and Filtering.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to adopt the first reading of
Ordinance No. 201 as amended. Mr. Nesbitt seconded. All voted egye.
Motion carried.
Ordinances No. 198, 199, 200 and 201 are being emended by the
Village Attorney for second readings on December 26th.
Council Meeting
December 12, 1972
Page Five
V. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. Mayor's Report
1. Notice of December Dinner Meeting, Hennepin County League of
Municipalitites with State Legislators on December 14, 1972.
The Mayor discussed the meeting scheduled for December 14th.
B. Clerk's Report
1. Village Clerk's recommended License Application List Dated
December 12, 1972.
A motion was made by Mr. Nesbitt to approve the license application
list dated December 12th as follows:
PLUMBING 1972/73
D.L.H. Plumbing Co. - David L. Bromley
National Plumbing & Heating Corp. - Frank Hochstien
Key Plumbing, Inc. • David L. Farr
Viking Mechanical - A. A. Wendell
Robert's Plumbing - Robert J. Stant
CIGARETTE 1973
Gummow Vending Co. - Cedar Hills Golf - William C. Gummow
COt0PRCIAL KENNEL 1973 •
Kingdale Kennels, Inc. - Jerry Carnes
PRIVATE KENNEL 1973
Clayton W. Brace, 9140 W. Staring Lane
BEER OFF SALE &CIGARETTE 1973
Eden Prairie Grocery - Haakon J. Nyhammer
BEER ON & OFF SALE 1973
Eden Prairie Legion Assoc. - Cedric L. Warren
BEER ON & OFF SALE & CIGARETTES 197a
Dutch's Resort - Kenneth Schaitberger
Schmidt's Produce - A. F. Schmidt
The Wye Cafe - Jesse J. Schwartz
Donn ( Margies - Donn F. Schmidel
Lyons Tap - Sears Lyons
BEER ON 1973
Olympic Hills Golf - Donald J. McGlynn
hrs. Meyers seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
Council Meeting
December 12, 1972
Page Six
C. Manager's Reports
1. Authorize Contract with Howard, Needles, Tammen &
Bergendoff to Design Major Center Ring Route from
Highway 5 Southerly and Then Northeasterly to
Highway 169.
The Manager asked that this matter be tabled to the December
26th meeting.
2. Change Order ail. Peter Lametti Construction Co.
Sewer and Ilatermain Improvements Along Westgate
Boulevard.
motion was made by Mrs. lieyers to approve Change Order is1
for Peter Lametti Construction Co. in the amount of$4,683.11.
Mr. Cosmano seconded. On roll call, all voted eye. Motion
carried.
3. Change Order ;;1. Lametti & Sons. Mitchell Heights Sub-
Trunk Sanitary Sever. Pile Bents to be Installed as Per
Request of Metropolitan Sewer Board.
A motion was made by Mr. Cosmano to approve Change Order ##1, Lametti
&Sons in the amount of $880. Mrs. Meyers seconded. On roll call,
ell voted eye. Motion carried.
4. Change Order irl. McCrossan, Inc. Mitchell-Baker Road
Improvement. Install Storm Sewer Pipe as Per Request of
Eden Land Corporation.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to approve Change Order #1, C. S.
McCrossan in the amount of$1,427. Mr. Nesbitt seconded. On roll
call, all voted aye. Motion carried.
5. Change Order #6. Northern Contracting Co. Nine Mile One
Trunk Sanitary Sewer. Topsoil and Seed on South Slope of
W. 66th Street North of Forest Hills School.
A motion was made by Mr. McCulloch to table this item until the
December 26th meeting. Mr. Nesbitt seconded. All voted aye.
Motion carried.
6. Change Order 7. Orfei & Sons. Topview Sanitary Sewer
and Watermain (Lateral , Chanµ;es in Sewer and Water
Service Size and Location as per Request of Howard Eaeraer,
Resident.
This item was tabled until the December 26th meeting for more
information.
Council Meeting
December 12, 1972
Page Seven
• caution No.
7. Baker AuthorizedthesMayorrand Manager to•SignB 616.
the Purchase
Agreement.
A moticn was made by Mr. McCulloch to adopt Resolution No. 616
authorizing the Mayor and Manager to sign the PPurch a Agreement
with American Oil Co. in the amount of $9,500
Site. Mrs. Meyers seconded. On roll call, all voted
aye. Motion carried.
VI. FINANCES
A. Report on Impact of Waste Water Treatment Grant Change.
The Manager reviewed the report dated December 5th frail John Frans,
• Finance Director. The original grant funding the Water Treatment
Plant provided for a federal share of$89,370 and a State share of
$40,625 for a total grant of$125,995. The change to a 75% Federal
grant and no state participation brings a lose to the Village in the
amount of$8,120.
B. Payment of Claims No. 11221 Lhromgh 11273 and No. 1001 through
1]39.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to approve claims 11221 through
11273 and 1001 through 1139 for payment. he. Cowan seconded.
On roll call, all voted aye. Motion carried.
C. Cash& Investment Report.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to accept end place on file the
Cash & Investment Report dated December 12, 1972. Mr. Cosmano
seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 10:50 P.M.
Edna M. Holmgrems, Clerk
I
1 .:
STAFF PLANNING REPORT
PROJECT: Anderson Lake P.U.D.
APPLICANT: McAllister Properties, Inc.
LOCATION: South of 494, west of the Eden Prairie-Bloomington
boundary north of Anderson Lake.
REQUEST: Concept Plan Approval for the proposed residential
development.
GENERAL COMMENTS:
Important to any land use consideration for the Anderson Lake P.U.D. site
must be the numerous external site features. These features are physical,
such as the impact of 494; social due to the single family residential to the
east; and political because of the adjacent zoning for industrial and resi-
dential. Of great significance is the exact type building proposed. I am
evaluating the specific style unit proposed and not the multiple use in general
because the constraints of the site require specialized solutions.
RELATIONSHIP TO EDEN PP.AIRIECOMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN & ZONING:
The )968 Guide Plan indicates the lar.d adjacent to 494 from Eden Prairie's
eastern boundary to the 2)2/494 interchange as indust'ial land with the open
space preservation along the creek to the north and Anderson Lake to the
south. It must be remembered that the Guide Plan indicated concepts that
would influence development. The concepts may still be valid today, such as
the Major Center Area or Purgatory Creek corridor, but the exact type uses
may have changed. Indicating industrial usage implies an intense use of
the land. McAllister Properties have examined the site carefully and have
concluded the Industrial/Office usage, at this time, is not appropriate and
multiple residential makes better economic and site preservation sense. My
opinion is that this decision is correct.
TP,ANSPORTATION CONSIDERATION:
Today the site is close to the Hwy. )8 and 494 diamond interchange, acces-
sible along West 78th street. The access west today is to )69 and 494 at
the "Y" about one mile from the site. Future plans are for West 70th Street
to connect to the M.C.A. ring road just east of the "Y", and that 18 and 494
will become a non-local access interchange when )69 is constructed. There
would be a bridge over new )69 which would connect West 78th St. to Bush
Lake Road in Bloomington. The direct access to 994 that the site enjoys today
would be reduced when )69 is constructed, which could be 20 years from now.
Most of the trips that are not local in nature will go east to )8 and on to 494.
Those of local shopping, school, community, etc.would be directed west on
West 78th to the ring route. The capacities of West 78th are adequate to
handle the 900 trips/day expected from this project.
Internal project circulation will serve the units directly without conflict with
other property owners or the Village system. The street that serves the
�7'1
c
STAFF PLANNING REPORT
Page 2
multiple unit should have a turnaround of sufficient size to allow emergency
vehicle access. Also, some type of emergency vehicle access must be
provided to the southerly end of the hillside multiple unit. The units must
accommodate the turnaround requirements of emergency townhouse vehicles.
PROJECT OBJECTIVES:
"Control changes of existing grades to a minimum . . . and minimize impact
upon natural character of site" responds directly to needs of the site.
Protection of the natural Lakeshore 250 feet from the water does satisfy that
objective. The units proposed, townhouse and terraced, underground parking,
hillside multiple responds to the steep slopes and heavily wooded north slope.
The orientation of the units is toward the site amenities of Anderson Lake and
the woods, and the housing types proposed are well suited to each site.
The price of the units would not encompass a broad income range since they
would be in the $30,000 and up category. The high cost of the unit's con-
struction would rule out the low-moderate income ranges. The adjacent single
family homes are in the $40,000 plus bracket, which should be rather compatible
with the proposed units.
The economic viability of this project is important due to the high land value
and the untried unit type proposed. The economics of the proposal are
important at the concept stage because approval of the multiple unit is based
heavily upon the structural type and plan proposed.
SITE PLAN ANALYSIS:
Siting of the multiple unit on the southeast slope does as little damage as
possible to the natural vegetation and flood plain area. The 20 to 30 foot
cut required will permit total underground parking on two levels. The plaza
court space provides two side exposure for most units and a unique recreation
space. The effect on the natural lakestiore should be minimized by"barrier
plantings" along the lake to discourage man's intrusion.
The northerly slope facing the freeway is heavily wooded in two areas,
which are being preserved with townhouses clustered around the groves. The
siting of the units in the townhouse area should be carefully examined as they
relate to noise levels from 494 and West 78th. The location of garages and
non-windowed walls could greatly reduce the freeway noise. When develop-
ment stage approval is requested, these factors would be studied closely.
SUM MARY:
The building of housing on this site is highly desirable because it provides
a compatible transition from the industrially zoned land west to the single
family units to the east. Also, the preservation of the natural land form and
vegetation is highly desirable rather than extensive grading. The 250 foot
public land dedication along Anderson Lake will open the park space around
the lake to the Bloomington residents as well as protecting the shore.
STAFF PLANNING REPORT
Page 3
The success and critical factor in any approval of the multiple unit is the
design concept used. McAllister Properties is proposing a terraced townhouse/
apartment building, either for sale or rental. Approval of the multiple dwelling
use is directly related to the unit type proposed in the brochure. A major
design change in the multiple building would nullify the concept approval of
that part of the proposal and would require resubmission to the Planning
Commission of another building typel
Construction of the project as proposed would be a valuable addition to Eden
Prairie's housing opportunities as well as effectively using the natural features
of the site.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the concept plan as submitted with special emphasis upon the multiple
unit building type proposed. Approval is solely based upon the terrace style
unit and not any apartment building.
The exact number of units in the project is not specified in the recommendation
since building plans are not complete, but the number proposed, 162 total
units, is the maximum allowable.
DP:kg
I= 'I-� ti
A
PRELIMINARY STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 15, 1972
APPLICANT: McAllister Properties, Inc.
LOCATION: 15 Acres of Land Located South of I-494 and the
Eastern Boundary of Eden Prairie and Bloomington,
H north of Anderson Lakes. '—
REQUEST: Concept Plan Approval of the Planned Unit Development
for 15 acres of Residential
FROM: Dick Putnam, Village Planner
COMMENTS:
This project is located along an area that has been identified on the
Village Comprehensive Guide Plan as being industrial and office usage.
Some zoning exists to the west of the site as 1-5 Park, and public space
along the lake. On the north of the freeway to the west is also I-5 Park.
Evaluation of the use of this site must take into account the neighboring
uses, both the single family residential in Bloomington at the intersection
of Co. Rd. 18 and I-494 and the industrial as mentioned, and its
relationship to Anderson Lakes Regional Park. The features of the site,
the relationship to the marsh, and the high hill of 70 ft. are major
k
considerations in the use and site plan proposed. 1-494 as an impact
on this site, both visually, audibly, and psychologically, should be
evaluated with great care. Access to the site will be from the frontage
road, 78th Street, which will have access to the interstate system to the
west at the Major Center and Ring Route Area, but not at Co. Rd. *Y18 and
I-494 in the future.
1
•
•
Preliminary Staff Planning Report
November 16, 1972
Page 2
•
Critical to the success of this site is the building type proposed in the
multiple structure. As you are aware, this would be classified as
terraced housing, much the same as was proposed in the Marsh-
Midwest Terminal's terraced hillside unit. Total underground parking,
the court plaza area, and the excellent view of Anderson Lakes are all
extremely positive features of such a unit. It remains to be seen
whether such a unit can economically be built within the Metropolitan
Area within the next few years. Therefore, any concept plan approval
may well have a time limit suggested by the Commission.
Since the relationship of this site to the adjacent single family site
within Bloomington is critical, it would seem appropriate to advise the
neighborhood residents of the proposal and make the staff's time
available for explanation of the project. Of concern, should be the
impact of developing within one municipality and greatly influencing
residents of another municipality. The Commission and Staff concerned
should be directed to this area for public information of this project.
DP:kg
•
De,cembor 22. 1972
kir. Paul i odpath
Medan of the Council:
Toe Snowdriftors of :.Hen Prairie aro interested in
sa.fo and rosponsibio snow:aobilin:;. Many of our Liu:doers have
taken an active part in presenting the Snow.aobilo Safety Train-
ing Course to young, peoplo of our area every year.
We are also interested in other areas we could be of
help to t:ae connuunity and would like to offer our :eanpower
a:xi ra:oiii.a�e to the :!t +'ny 1c1140 lie (1t4o1,1 1,, +,i ::"ruin•.
l'.• ' i,,. ,1., L,, Ll i.. �,. vi, u,• uvn i..a, ui nL,+l., ,,,,, I,.• .,,
:il.arli:�a U:iluc lu tiu.i'oi i,,;; u w.•ulua iu.O Cai.ilau t:+a.a;,o
and woods for injured •oroons and ani:aais.
iwll of oar +aa:n:;ors aro resido+its of Bien Prairio. A
list of naln0s and tc+lopGono nu:aburs pail oo sent to the Public
Sarfoty Director of :nenuers w::o aro available at ally
ii vu a.w i+o ul• at:.,ant,.J.wa to you or you i+.+vo any
qucatluu ;ai. nog: c'+41 io.a A::+'+u.r al, 941-lj17.
Sina.,.wl,,
L4)O.-14J
Warro:z yers, :'resiac,t
Snowdrifters,
cc: Jack Hacking
itobert Heinrich
XiNLZ6OTA
RESOLUTION
NO. ,3k
offered thefollcainr
Resolution:
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Contract heretofore submitted, signed and exeuutcd
by the Suburban Hennepin County Relief Board of the County of Hennepin for and
during the year 19.23 for the administration and supervision of poor relief in
the v411oaa of_ F,i,,, p,,,;,,,, be, and the same is hereby accepted,
approved, renewed and extended for and during the year`1973 with the some
force and effect as though said original Contract, above described, were redated
and resigned and executed as of the date hereof.
The question vas on the adoption of the Resolution, and a roll being called
there were yeas and nays, as follows:
And so the Resolution was adopted.
I certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a Resolution Ian 1
by the r t i of vt i� o Of Eden Prairie Minncaoti,
at its regular special meeting held on the qth day of January fr
19-73.•
Edna M. Holmgran, Clerk
VI//_ c
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION REVIEW
ANDERSON LAKES PUD
January 4, 1973
The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the Anderson Lakes PUD
for its compatibility with the Open Space System Plan and its effect
on the environment, particularly the environment of the Anderson
Lakes Park.
While the Commission agreed that the land use seems appropriate,
several members felt that the "big" building was too high for this
location and that it would intrude visually on the nature area across
the lake. The Commission also favored a rustic exterior for the
building rather than the stark white appearance portrayed in the
booklet. Cedar shake siding or something comparable was suggested to
soften the visual impact from the park.
The Commission recommends that the height of the building be lowered
one story, that a rustic exterior be mandatory, and that the land adjacent
to the actual lakeshore be dedicated to a depth of 250 feet. This will
allow for consistent lakeshore management on Anderson Lakes. Also,
the nature of the Anderson Lakes and the nature park makes it imperative
that no swimming or boating occur. Dedication of the lakeshore land
will provide the best mechanism for regulating the uses to which this
area is subjected.
MJ
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
December 19, 1972
•
A. Anderson Lake PUD, residential development along north shore Of
Anderson Lake. Staff report and reconuaendation from last meeting.
Era. Schee informed the Commission that the Park and Recreation
Commission had reviewed and approved the Anderson Lake PLED concept.
Residents have been informed of the pending development but have
not come forth.
The one year time period would be a schedule where in working
drawings would be completed in nine months and construction in
the following three nonths.
Action Taken:
Mr, Merger moved and lira. Schee seconded that the Anderson Lake
1CUD concept plan be approved:
a. As submitted in the brochure
b. Eased solely on the terraced style unit
c. With maximum number of units for this proposal not to
exceed 162 units.
d. With adherence to a one year time limit to begin construction.
lir. Sorensen expanded stipulation c by telling Mr. Garnaker and
his associates that the 162 units was not a hard and fart figure.
If it was found that the land would not allow this number of units,
a lesser number should be built.
Sorensen, Schee, Boerger, Nesbitt eyed and Fosnocht abstained.
PLANNING CO 1ISSION MEETING
December 5, 1972
•
B. Anderson Lake PUD residential development north of Anderson Lakes and
south of 494 near Co. Rd. #16. 130 units of multiple terraced
housing and 32 townhouse,units on a 15 acre site. Staff report and
recommendation.
ilr. Putnam explained his staff planning report. hr. Dick Garmaker,
developer, said a time period of one year would be an adequate time
limit for his project and voiced his comnittment to the plan. Ile
said corporate offices and perhaps cinemas were being planned for
the proposed commercial area to the west of the proposed project.
hir. Fosnocht spoke of the impact of the flood plain area and told
of his concern about the intrusion on the lake. fir. Aslandis felt
that the plantings would surely not eliminate but would prevent
or minimize this intrusion. Shoreview Manor, Edina-Southuale
Highrise, and Chateau Shelard are current projects of ficAllister, Inc.
Action Taken:
Further research was desired by the Commission members so it was
moved by Iir. Buerger and seconded by Mr. Drown to hold the item
over for two weeks and place it on the Commission's agenda for
December 19. Boerger. Brown, Fosnocht, Schee eyed. Sorensen
abstai ned.
•
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Noveniber 21, 1972
•
B. Anderson Lake :JD, a residential development proposal on
north edge of Anderson Lakes and west of Bloomington bou„dry.
Mr. Putnam felt the Staff Report outlined the plan, but felt ihst
the residents in Bloomington cbuiting this development as oropo:.cd
should be contacted so they could attend the next Commission
meeting. He pointed out that the adjacent area to the proposed
development is zoned industrial.
Mr. Aslandis gave a slide presentation of the area showing topo,
vego;tation, water, utilities plan, soil conditions, land use and
open space provisions.
action Taken:
Mrs. Schee told Mr. Aslandis that the proposal would be accepted
for Staff report and recommendation, which would be forthcoming
in two weeks.
Before the meeting adjourned, Mr. l'csnocht asked if any action
had been taken by the Preserve or Edenvale regarding the storage
of recreational vehicles. He felt a logical solution would be to
have a definite policy about how the vehicles would be stored in
these two areas. Mr. Putnam was requested to follow up on this.
�Y -I _
/ •' E ACE,.SIOR HOP%INS
I.
MINNEAPOL IS ��yry;yy
• . /�-
- �
CHANHASSEN �� �. N
�
EDEN PRAIRIE yp VS
BLOOMINGTON Mf OF al':`(rP
SUPEAN'E p4c ENT -
n A N:130
r cIi P e sI , ROBERT*F A.L LEN erica ASSISTANT TO `:.'E. FT'E RMIENOENT
SNAKOPEE DISTRICT 272 FOR CUFRICUIu:I ANC. :NGi AUC ION
8025 SCHOOL ROAD GOpoos CULBEPG
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55343 BUSII4 MANAGER
91 :140
HIGH SCHOOL PRINCIPAL PRAIRIE VIEW ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL , HIGH SCHOOL ANNE% A FOREST RILLS ELE MENTRRY
941 1110 9.1i 1I49 941 1141 PRNI.PA L
M'1328
December 19, 1972
CARTER & GERTZ, INC.
8920 rranlo Road
Eden Prairie, Winnesota 55343
Gentlemen:
It is our understanding that under the original concept approval by the
Village of Tien Prairie THE PRESERVE set aside a twenty-two (22)
acre site in its property which lies South of Amsden Road and is bounded
on the East and West by Count-✓ Road 18 and Franlo Road respectiv'ly.
We have been notified by THE PRESERVE that their plans call for the
development of the entire area olmei 'sy them lying South of Amsden
road which Ire, i•irindes th+s proposed school site.
The c-hool Board, after due deliberation, flan decided that they no
longer are arnsiderinr, this area f^r a future school site and ia', .1
incentinn to purc''Ise acme f ron THE PRESERVE.. Therefore, they
"'SE?'.'" of its obligation to
are, •itl; L Iis letter, rclea an^ ""': 7` F•
further ::oil this land there',,, peroittino T.,y: P"ES'r.^.V1' to proceed with iE>
development plans for 1973. The School hoard Trill officiall:• notify the
Village of rden Prairie of its decieion relatiag to the aforementioned
to"nty-two (222) acres.
Very truly yours,
tiv:: PWt1R e8. Cl"$ El,
1 lter ,ichardson, Interim Superinten.ient
s '41"/r Cditraiu✓.n.t r1 art owe 11ortersl At um,/,,,,/ute
cc, ''r. Ro`ert !lei:rich, '1i i 1 nee '.'ana.•er 1......`
T.en 'haa}ers, Villa^e ^s3essor ,
ALBERT H. NEWMAN
ATIOAN[Y AT LAW
310 FOURTH AVENUE SOUTH • SUITE 924.FLOUR EXCHANGE BUILDING
MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 55415
PHONE(6121 333-2555
December 12, 1972
Mr. Marty Jessen
Director of Parka and Recreation
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55343
Re: Eden Prairie vs. Gorra
9000 County Road 18
Our file No. 3608
Dear Mr. Jessen:
Please be informed that I represent Mr. Michael J.
Gorra in connection with your proposed acquisition of
the above-oapti one property.
Your offer to purohase dated August 16, 1972, is
hereby reepeotfully declined.
If the Village wishes to acquire the property
they may proceed by condemnation.
All further contacts should properly be between
counsel and myself, and no one else.
I would appreciate a plat showing the nature and
extent of the proposed taking and the names of such
experts as the Village has had appraise the property.
Very truly yours,
Li.l� 1'i•
Albert H. Newman
Attorney at Lew
AH i/alw
•
d
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA
JAMES M.KING
COUNCIL MEMBERS MAYOR
JOHN E.MALONE
WM.V.BELANGER,JR.
JAMES E.O'NEIL
RAY 0.PLEASANT
CLYDE E.ALLEN,JR.
JAMES H.ANDERSON
December 8 1972
Mayon Loren Law -- City o6 R chiield
Mayon Anthwt C Bnedesen -- Village o6 Edina
Mayon Paul R Redpath o6 Eden PnaiAie
Dean Mayon
In accordance with insinuations inom my City Couneil, we are
enclosing a neeoIution waging the Hennepin County Commissioners
to necogn.ize the South Hennepin Se.tviees Planning 8oard as the
o66iecal human service planning unit bon South Hennepin County,
and to cmnedJnte!y commit County neaouneee to the pnovicecon of
pnognams 06 service recommended by the South Hennepin Scald,
adopted on December 4 1972.
Ae you /salt, this Board was established unclothe Joint Powers
Act, with the Villages o6 Eden Pna.ini.e, Edina, and Cities o6
Riehiield and Bloomington being the 4 participating muni.cipa.11tiee.
The organization has been in operation now ion approximately one
yeah and has been ata66ed by a i"PPtime dinecton since April 06
1972. Funding has been provided by Hennepin County. Dwu ng this
6ulst yeah o6 operation, a great deal o6 time as well as money
has gone into planning bon the health needs o6 South Hennepin
County, to the point where many of us heel that the .time has
arrived to slack oii on the planning e66ont and to begin implemen-
tation. It appears that the County would laze to organize all
o6 Hennepin County in much the same manner that we have jointly
organized South Hennepin, and to proceed with adHitional planning.
We ieel that the South Hennepin Human Services Planning Board is
now in a position to begin implementation, and ahou.ed not be delayed
while other areas o6 Hennepin County are playing eateh-up.
CITY with a FUTURE
Resatution Pg 2
12-8-12
Thexe6one, .ii you concua with aux position, we would be most
appn.eciati.ve ii you could see bit to adopt this same !resolution,
on one s.imitan to it, and Woad to the Hennepin County Board.ob
Commiee.i.onens.
Thanks so much ion you& continued support and coopeaation.
/77 L
ames M King, Mayon /
City o6 Bloomington
1MK/aj
enc
cc Tom Ticen, Chmn, Hennepin County Board
Tom Olson, County Commis0.tonem
Hale Simonson, PLtectoh, Mental RaLaxdation Aaea Program
•
RESOLUTION NO. 'a-ii9 (ti
• RESOLUTION URGING THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COh14ISSIONERS TO RECOGNIZE
THE SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING BOARD AS THE OFFICIAL
HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING UNIT FOR SOUTH SUBURBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
AND TO IMMEDIATELY COMMIT COUNTY RESOURCES TO THE PROVISION OF
PROGRAMS OF SERVICE RECOMMENDED BY THE SOUTH HENNEPIN BOARD.
•
WHEREAS, the City of Bloomington is, along with Eden Prairie, Edina and
Richfield, a member of the South Hennepin Human Services Planning
Board, which is formed under the Joint Powers Act; and
WHEREAS, the South•Hennepin Human Services Planning Board has made an
evaluation of the human service needs in the south suburban area,
• as well as an inventory of existing services,upon which recom-
mendations regarding priorities of action by the County may be
formulated; and
WHEREAS. there is now sufficient information to enable the County to
initiate some of the needed programs of service in the south •
suburban area;
NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of 4ieesiogton
in regular meeting assembled, that the Hennepin County Commissioners
are urged to recognize the South Hennepin Human Services Planning
Board as the official human services planning unit for the south
suburban area of Hennepin County, including the commmmrities of
Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina and Richfield, and to commit
County funds and other resources to the provision of needed
. programs of service as recommended by the South Hennepin Human •
Services Planning Board. •
•
•
Passed and adopted this fourth day of December, I9l2.
40'/' „'4
•
Attest
1, �
City Clerk
DRAFT COPY 6NLY
SUMMARY OF A PROPnSAL FOR
A COMMUNITY PLANNING PROCESS
FOR HUMAN SERVICES
Hennepin County recognizes the need to improve the delivery of human services,
including primary health care services. In order to improve the delivery of
services, however, it is first necessary to develop a planning process which
will insure that the real needs of County residents are identified and that
resources can be effectively allocated to support the needed services. Gener—
ally recognized concepts of planning as well as suggestions made by the commu—
nity at the public hearings on primary health care, October 17, 1972, lead to
the conclusion that the identification of geographic planning communities and
the involvement of a broad spectrum of consumers and providers will improve
the planning process.
The following summary describes a Community Planning Process which Hennepin
County Government proposes for implementation. For those services which are a
County responsibility, it is proper fur Hennepin County to assume a leadership
role in identifying needs and allocating resources. However, the planning and
delivery of all human services to County residents is not and should not be
exclusively within the responsibility of Hennepin County. If the human services
needs of Hennepin County residents are to be efficiently and effectively met,
it is necessary for the public and private sector to coordinate their planning
efforts. Hennepin County, therefore, supports and encourages efforts of private
providers to organize and cooperate with consumers and County Government to
determine the most effective means of meeting community needs.
Reactions and suggestions are solicited and encouraged from citizens, groups
and organizations before the Community Planning Process will be presented for
approval by the County Board of Commissioners on January 9, 1973.
Summary of Recommendations
1. It is proposed that thirteen geographic planning areas be
established within Hennepin County. Ten of the proposed
areas are within the City of Minneapolis and there are
three suburban areas. The thirteen areas are subject to
subdivision (especially in the suburbs) and/or combination
depending upon community suggestions and further experience
in the planning process.
2. It is proposed that consumers and providers be involved in
planning for the delivery of servii.es through the establish-
ment of human services planning groups. One human services
planning group would be established for each geographic
planning area. The planning groups would be officially
recognized by Hennepin County as having responsibility to
plan, evaluate and make recommendationm fur human services
which should be provided by Hennepin Conity.
Page - V U U 1: V iti n�'i Oam
g Two Summary
It is proposed that the human services planning groups be
established as the outcome of a community organization period.
During the community organization period, a series of Commu-
nity Workshop meetings would be held in each geographic plan-
ning area. Staff would be provided by the County to each
geographic planning area to assist consumers and providers
in conducting the Workshop meetings and in developing the
structure for the human services planning group.
Further information or additional copies of the Proposal are available from
the County Administrator's Office, 348-7575.
Attachments: Map of Human Services Planning Areas In Minneapolis
Map of Human Services Planning Areas in Suburban Hennepin County
Hennepin County Guidelines for the Establishment of Human
Services Planning Groups
' I
APPENDDC 2. 11r,,i,\ _;41I:',_t:'1?-,)1 \•:.,:iNt; .11:LAS
r(II; ,.,IINNI,•10)1,1S
r . • 1
... . ... ,.1..••••••'''''''-"""•••••9t•-.7.,„.,...-1-4..,.\-\-4
•
• • i 1
1 ' =
1 .
4 .
: • . i
.17 ,,,/1.1
."1' (C,/( • •' ,-.1 .. .. .
, . .....1 .
.
, . . i• - • . C:2
! _....".. C,
. .
1 int5
i ....4
., ) 4 4.-.•
r----I C2
, 44
1 iip,,• \-\-; 54„ . k,.
. ‘,,, 'iv, dakt •
r-----
,, ,,,‘ it.. . , ,
, ..„,
...2121
rill"
04
'•''' '.14'‘'''''..1...,. g/ .711 '
1 i d f,"•-)7 1,r7i* 4 1",., --- .
, .
'' .'Ar6i,r:- .0' ,.., . a, , •
, li 1 . ,•,' 1 :" • 1 „ am do. .,,,
liir .... Ili .•
, it 1111. A I
IL ,.1 ,_Ali,0 4,AA, V ..., #
.*1 011ie
, ....
14 :.
I . r
• •• .
HUMAN SI;I;\'It'! t'..s .',..••,' .k .
SI.GI'I.t:1:' I. V.,' 1 ' ;,, ,
APPENDIX 3 n''' . _ •_..,
/,''
�� �s: ti
,, ,. . r+swm\ FANOX
A
...s,... •. C.'Y�A taz
' 2 I,' •"P 4t ._ SGa.rii 'nacos
if/A:Li ' fir:. 44
may, wtu4
2) � 7 ?I )1 W�✓ 268m ngil
4it
uide
p.., i,..,- A f4.. ''.1•4,111 , 768 0, 1:1 1:!-
(7,--'.-/ _, D
L.,„,,,, i i , ..;,,,,- ,.....:41.11 i*.
...,
270 a ,.� •,, ��. rand/
�j 271.01 t 206.01 r t r ^* a� •�
l)
v 2/5.4t
s t
n, � � g
MENNg N , r r 1, ''Mgm .
'�9 ^l L ,-,-
m4,17'"`^► ., )' .,,..t .. s. ,.... ei a . : ' .. �4
�wrr 27� n r< ,.. a t� Q✓
llekk
I`^' ��0 - � --� �sus m � �... t
01
w— ,rnor
l,_ _ a„4 _.._ ._> :a.�_..`,:�T a__._ aet nt { � / ?r 1�,�1r.l:.L. ., I'w m.nr' j11/4 '~
269.01 anaa own Tract Numbers {�`��,M1P,,^"�"^ ,..�rl/' " ,` /` ' �
'+T a... •—Tract Boundaries
�..�. County Boundary ` .. _ N y''11 �y w�t
Municipal Boundary •tLf�`r � iwii
�— Township Boundary ,j`,
_.. --- Water Body 1 • w ICi^ .
nr ��r-�^ it � . •
CENSUS TRACT wrat
• POI TNN el/ATV( , ; '..y.POt,y r.r.%
I
p - •
.. .••
DRAFT COPY OLY
APPENDIX $
HENNEPIN COUNTY GUIDELINES f'OR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
PLANNING GROUPS:
1. Not more than one planning group will be recognized by Hennepin County
in each geographic planning area, except where otherwise agreed by
Hennepin County.
2. The function of'the planning groups will include all human services,
except where otherwise mutually agreed by Hennepin County and the
planning group.
S. Planning groups must be representative of the geographic planning area.
4. Planning groups must be accountable to the residents of the geographic
planning area.
S. Planning groups will not administer direct services, except where other-
wise mutually agreed by Hennepin County and the planning group.
6. The County Board of Commissioners will retain ultimate control of all
expenditure of County funds, including approval of all contracts for
purchase of services, and approval of all federal and state grants
involving County funding and/or sponsorship.
ii
•
•
A
• DATE: December 22, 1972
TO: Village Council
FROM: Village Manager R. P. Heinrich
SUBJECT: EDENVALE 4TH ADDITION —FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
There are no changes from the preliminary plat approved on
December 12, 1972.
RPH:kg
•
DATE: December 22, 1972
II
TO: Village Council
FROM: Village Manager R. P. Heinrich
SUBJECT: ROUND LAKE ESTATES - FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
The final plat differs from the preliminary in that one lot
has been added and seven lots reduced in size.
The park and open space land has not been changed from the
preliminary plat. The Engineering and Planning Departments
recommend approval of the final plat as presented.
RPB:mn
t
t
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HEXISPIN COUNTY, .laNNESOTA
ORDI.'1ANCE NO. 196
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING
AM MENDEZ ORDINANCE NO. 135
HIDDEN POMS
The Council of the Village of Eden Prairie does ordain as
follows:
Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended by adding to
Section 7, Township 116, Range 22 as follows:
That part of the West half of the Northeast quarter of
Section 7, Township L16, Range 33, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, lying Southerly of the Center Line of Town
Road No. 66 and Northerly of the Northerly line of the
abandoned Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railway Company
right-of-way.
R1 13.5
First read at a regular meeting of the Council of the Village
of Eden Prairie this 12th day of December, 1972 and finally read, adopted
and ordered published at a regular meeting of the Council of said Village
on the 26th day of December, 1972.
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
Edna X. Holmgren, Clerk
r
•
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
PENNEPIN COUNTY, J'DN;`%SOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 197
AN ORDINANCE CE CREATLNG A DEPARTMENT
OF PV3LIC SAFETY
TrD; VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES
ORDALN:
Section 1. Creation. There is hereby created a Department
of Public Safety for the Village of Eden Prairie.
Section 2. Director. The Department of Public Safety shall
be under the direction and supervision of a Director of Public Safety,
who shall be appointed by and be subject to the supervision and direct-
ion of the Village Manager.
Section 3. Purpose. The Department of Public Safety shall be
responsible for the preservation of the public peace and order, the
prevention and detection of crime, the apprehension of offenders, the
equal protection of persons and property, the fair and just enforcement
of law, the prevention of fires, the removal of fire hazards, the render-
iog of fire fighting and other emergency services, the rendering of civil'.
defense services, and the development and implementation of a program for
the education and training of both employees of the Village, volunteer
workers for the Village, and citizens of the Village respecting matters
involving in particular all of the foregoing purposes and in general the
safety and well being of the community at-large.
Section 4. Duties of Director. The Director of Public Safety
shall be responsible to the Village Manager for all aspects of public
safety including police activities relating to the fair and just enforce-
ment of all laws, statutes and ordinances and the preservation of justice,
law and order in the Village; the direction of fire fighting, fire prot-
ection and fire prevention activities of the Village; the direction of
civil defense and police reserve activities within the Village and the
assignment of personnel within the Public Safety Department.
Section 5. Organization of Public Safety Department. The
Public Safety Department shall consist of a police department division,
a fire department division, a civil defense organization division and
police reserve organization division. The police department division
shall be under the direct supervision of the Public Safety Director.
The 'fire department department division shad be supervised by the
Fire Chief who shall be responsible to and under the direct supervision
J
• Ordinance No. 197
Page Two
of the Public Safety Director. The Civil Defense and Police
Reserve divisions shall be responsible to and under the direct
supervision of the Public Safety Director. In addition to the
Public Safety Director and the various department divisions here-
; inabove named, supplementary personnel may be added to the Depart-
ment of Public Safety from tine to time as determined by the
Council, the number and qualifications of such persons to likewise
be determined by the Council and the actual appointment or employ-
ment of such persons to be accomplished by the Public Safety Director.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force
from and after its passage and publication.
4 First read at a regular meeting of the Council of the Village
of Eden Prairie this 12th day of December, 1972 and finally read,
adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the Council of
said Village on the day of , 1972.
Paul R.Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST:
•
SEAL
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk
PROGRESS REPORT FROM SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CATV STUDY
COMMISSION TO PARTICIPATING CITY AND VILLAGE COUNCILS
Early in 1972 a number of elected and appointed municipal officials
in the southwest suburban area net on several occasions to discuss the —
possibility of jointly studying CATV operations and regulations. As
a result of these informal discussions, a joint powers organization
was established this summer to undertake studies and make recommendations
on how to proceed with CATV enfranchising and regulatory processes
in the member communities. The villages of Eden Prairie and Edina
and the cities of St. Louis Park, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield
subsequently became parties to this agreement.
The primary purpose of the Southwest Suburban CATV Study Commission
is to consult with persons knowledgeable in CATV and persons who have
a special interest such as industry representatives, research repre-
sentatives, institutional representatives, political representatives,
municipal organizations, regulatory organizations, technical experts
and any other persons who can provide pertinent information concerning
CATV franchising and regulations. The joint powers agreement directs
the commission to undertake to investigate matters of common concern to
the parties and recommend a course of action to be pursued by,the
parties in the granting and enforcement of CATV franchises. Specifically,
the commission is requested to comment on whether the parties should have
uniform ordinances, whether they should undertake to grant a franchise
to the same party and whether they should establish a continuing
organization to administer and enforce any franchise or franchises
which are granted by the parties.
The joint powers agreement also indicated that the commission
should undertake to make such recommendations no later than December 31,
1972. While it will not be possible for the commission to make final
recommendations by this date, the commission did feel that the member
parties should be advised by way of this report as to the activities
and progress of the commission to date.
The original meeting of the commission was held on August 16,
1972. At that time Mr. McDonald (Hopkins) was elected president.
Ms. Yonehiro (Minnetonka) was elected vice president, Mr. Schrad
(St. Louis Park) was elected secretary and Mr. Burggraaff (Richfield)
was elected treasurer. By-laws were passed and adopted by the
commission at a subsequent meeting. Including the original meeting
on August 16, the commission has held a total of six meetings.
•
The commission spent considerable time in its early meetings
listening to presentations from individuals who have been involved
in various aspects of CATV in the metropolitan area. At the August 23,
1972 meeting Mr. Robert Heacock, assistant city attorney for Bloomington
and Mr. Gerald Davis, city manager for Fridley, made presentations
concerning their experiences with CATV in their municipalities. At
7
A Y
the September 13, 1972 meeting Mr. Robert Rohif, Director of the
Hennepin County Libraries, met with the commission and discussed
the interest of Hennepin County in participating, with the Southwest
Suburban CATV Study Comui.sion. Mr. Rohlf indicated that he and
the Hennepin County Library had been designated as the county's
official representative regarding cable television and that he
was, in effect, representing all of the various Hennepin County
operations.
In addition to obtaining general information from other
individuals, the commission was divided into a number of task forces.
Mr. Hanks (St. Louis Park), Mr. Novak (Hopkins) and Ms. Meyers
(Eden Prairie) serve on the Education Task Force. Mr. Heinrich
(Eden Prairie) and Mr. Henningsgaard (Minnetonka) serve on the
Rates and Regulations Task Force, Mr. Eide and Mr. Luettinger
(both of Richfield) serve on the Public Access Task Force, Mr.
Courtney (Edina) serves on the Program Regulation Task Force
and Ms. Tonehiro (Minnetonka) has assumed the task force effort on
Citizen Involvement.
The task force on education has met with representatives of the
school districts in the six communities and the school districts have
collectively prepared a position paper on CATV which is presently
under discussion. The task force on public access will be submitting
a report in the near future. The City of Richfield has plans to
appoint a seven member Citizen Advisory Committee for CATV and several
other communities have indicated that they will very shortly be
making similar appointments. The other task forces expect to be
making preliminary reports in the near future.
As s result of the meetings with various individuals concerning
CATV, and the work done by the task forces, the commission has
concluded that it appears very desirable to obtain outside professional
assistance to help in making recommendations required by the joint
powers agreement. Therefore, the commission is presently in the
process of preparing and reviewing specifications which will be
used as the basis for interviewing and selecting consulting assistance.
It is the goal of the commission to complete this work and to select
preliminary consulting services by the end of January, 1973.
In addition to cork on the subject of CATV in the Southwest
suburban area, the con ission has also been closely watching the
activities of the CATV advisory committee to the Metropolitan Council
and interest being expressed in CATV at the State level. Mr.
Schrad (St. Louis Park) who is a member of our commission, is also
a member of the CATV advisory committee to the Metropolitan Council
so that we have an excellent opportunity to be well informed on
the activities of that committee. The commission has sent letters
to all state elected officials representing the six participating
parties to inform them of the Southwest Suburban CATV Study
Commission and to request that they be aware of and keep the
objectives and goals of this commission in mind whenever they
may be considering proposed legislation which affects CATV.
The commission wants to thank each of the participating
municipalities for the support and time provided by elected
and appointed officials and would encourage any individual
council members to transmit whatever specific suggestions or
questions they might have on this subject to the commission
through their appointed representatives on the commission.
By Direction of the Southwest Suburban CATV Study Commission
Respectfully submitted,
Robert McDonald
Chairman
Southwest Suburban CATV Study Commission
• .w I
RIEKE CARROLL M ULLER ASSOCIATES INC
atcn:,ecta
DATE: December 20, 1972 engineers
TO: Robert Heinrich,Vil l age Manager, Eden Prairie
lama u,rvuYms
FROM: Dave Husby, RCM
(Ildlr'fer(
SUBJECT: SEWER AND WATER SERVICE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
EDEN PRAIRIE
n„:ng
office Sn tika
11°,14 ns(,atm.sobs 55545
Sewer and water utilities to serve the area along Duck Lake
Trail at the west edge of Eden Prairie would be provided as
follows: '700 vsrt, it.1 Awe,
si loins ie��'� m:nne,ota
SANITARY SEWER
A trunk sewer has been planned to extend from the existing
trunk at Ticonderoga Trail to Chanhassen. The preliminary
C design was based on servi cing a portion of Chanhassen and there `l I'
have been preliminary negotiations with Chanhassen. The tenta-
tive route for the trunk extends through the low ground lying
south of Duck Lake Trail. Although it is doubtful that a trunk e", "
sewer is necessary in this area unless used by Chanhassen, a Stal row""n""'"•'t'
lateral sewer could logically be installed in the same location
to serve that portion of Eden Prairie. The decision regarding
the service to Chanhassen will have to be made before the final
size and location is established.
ion na:•,L•::',,H.LA.
WATER J.T.A.Irt,.l.:.A.
IVn. I.rlunn:•nmtt•,A.LA.
Water to the area would be extended along Duck Lake Trail from
an existing 12" main at Ticonderoga Trail. The extension .•::..m:,r,,,.e,a
would probably be an 8 pipe depending on the type of develop-
ment, the proposed street layout and the rate of growth in la,:
the northwest corner. The preliminary engineering report should (
consider the eventual location of the proposed 12" trunk from indovalo
Duck Lake Trai 1 to the north. nnnlOn
twten:an,moni.:na
David O. Husby, P.
C
1
December 18, 1972
Mr. Robert Heinrich
Village Manager
Village of Eden Prairie
8950 County Road 4
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
•
RE: Change Order No. 6
Nine Mile One EP70-2-1
In March 1972 during the construction of the Nine Mile One
trunk sower, thr Village rcqucstied and approved n Change
I1r,lor for ..iscavai.i iC I I-r'Irlll 1 IwrI. lull UI I.hc
propos oil WesL 6btll SLrceL. Backfi11 maLerial was to be Laken
r from the north side of Kings Forest School . At this time a
i future road project was being considered so the slopes result-
ing from this excavation were not intended to be seeded until
a later date.
Recently the Village and Brauer & Associates, Inc ., concurred
in the decision to restore the slopes at this time since the
West 66th Street project appears to be a year in the future.
Mr. Jessen requested a special seed mix for the 4 :1 slopes
along with topsoil and mulch. These items were not included
within the Northern Contracting Company contract so Change Order
No. 6 was Prepared.
W The prices appear reasonable and considering the contractor
had equipment working in the immediate area, it seems very
practical to order Northern to do this work.
I hope this letter answers all of your questions and would
appreciate your earliest possible attention to this matter.
BRAUERA ASSQCIA EST,-:I NC: /
c L(UGC c Gd f— �wl
cal
Dennis K. Trisler, P.E.
DKT/sb
1 enclosure
l,i7,, itS 'LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 0 ENGINEERS El SURVEYORS 0ARCHITECTS
��3
Saint ^at::, biir,ncsota
Change Order No. 6
• Date
Project• NINE 1•IILE ONE TRUNK SANITARY SEWER - M.S.D. No. 71-18
•
Northern Contracting Co. •
Contractor:
Completion: Date May 15, 1972
Previous Revised
Description:
1. Apply topsoil to slope on West 66th Street nest to Forest Knolls School.
2. Apply seed and mulch to slope on West 66th Street next to Forest Knolls School.
Topsoil 83.2 c.y. @ 3.00 • $249.60
Mulch & seed 0.22 acre @ 350.00 77.00
$326.60
There will be no Metro Sewer Coard participation on this work.
IL is mutually agreed that this Change Order is in accordance with the above Contract dated
July 22, 1971 and that the change in the work described herein will be accomplished in ac-
cordance with the provisions of the Contract and that the Contract amount will be(increased) (dacxgxxxl in the
amount of THREE HUNDRED TWENTY SIX AND 60/100.
dollars $ $326.60 as full compensation for all work under this
Change Order and that the Contract completion date will be extended calendar days therefore.
Resident Engineer Date
•
Consulting Engineer' Chief Construction Engineer Date
Contractor Chief Engineer Date
Chief Administrator Data
.. ..n r'ti\sau.
I I Jiltt�/�/\ u fLJ�r!``JV�I-.,l1,I i VV I li`�,r., ;;TLE: 9-Mi1e One Trunk Sewer
! j �; SITE PLANNERS
O 6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE JOB # EP-70-2-1
�� EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55343 DATE: December 5, 1972
TELEPHONE (612) 941-1660
TO: Robert Heinrich
FROM: Dennis Trisler -----
SUBJECT: Change Order No. 6
This change order was required in order to protect the south
slope of West 66th Street in the area of Station 6 to 9.
The work on this change order was discussed with Gene Schuman
and Marty Jesson as to the area and turf requirements.
lom
I 7
/Z -7-7,2.
r
-y
•
4 Saint Paul, Minnesota
•
•
Change Order No. 6
11-29-72
• Date
Project: NINE MILE ONE TRUNK SANITARY SEWER - M.S.B. No. 71-18
Northern Contracting Co.
Contractor:
Completion: Date May 15, 1972 •
Previous Revised
Description:
1. Apply topsoil to slope on West 66th Street nest to Forest Knolls School.
2. Apply seed and mulch to slope on West 66th Street next to Forest Knolls School.
Topsoil 83.2 c.y: @ 3.00 $249,60
Mulch & seed 0.22 acre @ 350.00 77.00
$326.60
There will be no Metro Sewer Board participation on this work,
It is mutually agreed that this Change Order is in accordance with the above Contract dated
July 22, 1971 and that the change in the work described herein will be accomplished in ac-
cordance with the provisions of the Contract and that tho Contract amount will be (increased) (docraxxxt In the
mount of THREE HUNDRED TWENTY SIX AND 60/100.
ollars $ $326.60 as full compensation for all work under this
'hange Order and that the Contract completion date will be extended calendar days therefore.
') - i Resident Engineer Date
•
Consulting Engineer' Chief Construction Engineer Date
Contractor Chief F.ngincer Date
Chief Administrator Date
•
•
December 18, 1972 _
Mr. Robert Heinrich
Vi 1 lage Manager
Vi 11age of Eden Prairie
89 50 County Road 4
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
RE : Change Order No. 7
EP70-2-5 - Topview Sanitary Sewer
Mr . Howard Kaerwer owns property within Section 10 in Eden
Prairie, namely, Lot 3, B1 ock 1 , and Parcel No. 4500, Top-
view Acres Third Addition. During design this property was
to be served with the normal 4" sanitary and 1" water service.
During the construction of the lateral sewer and watermain,
the Village, Mr. Kaerwer, and Brauer & Associates, Inc. , had
conversations relating to the service to Parcel No. 4500. It
was decided by the Village and Brauer & Associates, Inc. , that
the extreme length of service to this parcel would require
a 6" sewer service and 1 1/2" water service. It was felt that
providing the larger services vas a responsibility of the Village
because of the location of the property, and not a special
request by the owner. The line was sized larger to anticipate
• future use for the property, similarly to the technique
utilized in designing trunk sewers.
This Change Order No. 7 was prepared in the best interests of the
▪ Village and we recommend that the cost be included in the
entire lateral projects.
(n
• I hope this has answered all of your questions and request
eJ your immediate attention to this matter.
• BRASIER & ASSOC YES,• IN
�L—•
CC Dennis K. Trisler, P.E.
DKT/sb
41 1 enclosure
('LANNENS H LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ❑ ENGINEERS 0 SURVEYORS 0 ARCHITECTS
�8y
,
ONTRACTOR: OWNER'S .
ORFEI & SOPS, INC. CONTRACT
NUMBER: (see below)
ir 1156 Hosier Street
CONTRACT DATE: Dec. 10, 1971
St. Paul , Minnesota 55116
OWNER CONTRACT
JOB: Sanitary Sewer & Water Improvements pmOuNT IV-c405.521 .67
OWNER: Village of Eden Prairie (II +III,IV) - $1,656,264.00
NOS. EP-70-2-5 & EP-70-2-6
The cost of the following changes, deletions or additions to the above
CONTRACT are hereby requested. This form rust be completed, signed and
returned to BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, INC. , 6440 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie,
MN 55343 before October 30 , 19 72 A detailed breakdown
(34a11) (need not) be attached.
• AMOUNT OF
DESCRIPTION OF THE CHANGES INCREASE DECREASE
Tooview Lateral Sanitary Sewer SAN 71-1-24
Increase
A. 6" C. I.S.P. Service 105 1.f. @ 54.84 $508.20
3. 8" x 6" WYE 1 each @ $12.12 12.12
520.32
13. 4" C. I .S.P. Services 105 1.f. @ $3.94 $413.70
70
15. 13.
" x 4" WYE 1 each @ $10.00 $423.70
•
Topvicw Lateral Watermain WTR 71-2-24 i
Increase
C. 11/2" Corporation Cock 1 each @ 530.00 $30.00 1
D. 11/2" Curb Stop & Box 1 each @ $50.00 $50.00
$80.00
Decrease $ 6.50
33. 1" Corporation Cock 1 each @ $6.50
35. 1" Curb Stop Box 1 each @ $24.00 24.00
$24. 0
The Amount of the Contract Shall be (INCREASED) QUOUS' X $ 146.12 -
Prepare d by:
BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONTRACTOR APPROVAL:
BY ORFEI & SONS, INC.
DATE: , 19 BY
. DATE , 19`
OWNER APPROVAL:
•
VII ''GE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
BY
DATE
1
I u;%lUER & ASSOCIATES, 1Cs TITLE: Watermain Improve.
j 1 SITE PLANNERS EP-70-2-5&6
� / ', , 6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE SAN 71-1-24
.` .� ' EDEN PRAIRIE, MINJESOTA 55343 JO3 WTR 71-2-24
_J TELEPHONE (612) 941-1660 DATE: November 24, 1972
TO: Robert Heinrich, Village Manager
FROM: Dennis Trisler, Brauer & Associates, Inc.
SUBJECT: Change Order No. 7
This change order was required as the result of a
meeting between Gene Schurman (Village of Eden P'rairie),
Howard Kaerwer (Resident) and Jim Christianson (Brauer
& Associates, Inc.) to discuss the location and service
for Mr. Kaerwer. It was decided that the constructing
of a 6" C.I.S.P. sewer service and a 11/2" water service
to Lot 3, from approximate Sta. 4+50 on Gordon Drive,
would be a logical solution for Mr. Kaerwer's use of. •
the property.
lom
S •
•
•
•
Z .� - L___
•
1,ult;‘ur. uRdcii NUMBER IV-7
CONTRACTOR: OWNER'S
• ORFEI & SONS, INC. CONTRACT
• NUMBER: (see below) !
1156 Homer Street
CONTRACT DATE: Dec. 10, 1971
St. Paul , Minnesota 55116
JOB; Sanitary Sewer & Water Improvements OAAWNEuRNNCrrONTRACT
(If-,III,IV)I- $1,656,264.00
O'rJNER• Village of Eden Prairie B&A
NOS. EP-70-2-5 & EP-70-2-6
The cost of the fol lowing changes, deletions or additions to the above
CONTRACT are hereby requested. This form must be completed, signed and
returned to BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, INC. , 6440 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie,
MN 55343 before October 30 , 79 • 72 A detailed breakdown
(--i a "i-) (need not) be attached. •
• • AMOUNT OF
DESCRIPTION OF THE CHANGES INCREASE DECREASE
Topview Lateral Sanitary Sewer SAN 71-1 —24
Increase
A. 6" C.I.S.P. Service 105 1.f. 0 $4 .84 $508.20
B. 8" x 6" WYE 1 each @ $12.12 12.12
$520.32 •
Dec ase
i3.�". C.I.S.P. Services •105 .1.f. @ $3 .94 $413.70
15. 8" x 4" WYE 1 each @ $10.00 10.00
• $423.70
•
Topview Lateral Watermain WTR 71-2.24 • .
Increase
C. 11" Corporation Cock '1 each @ $30.00 S30.00
D. 11/2" Curb Stop & Box 1 each @ $50.00 $50.00
$80.00 .
Decrease
33. 1" Corporation Cock 1 each @ $6.50 $ 6.50
35. 1" Curb Stop Box 1 each 0 $24.00 24.00
$30.50
The Amount of the Contract Shall be ( INCREASED) '00801233(A(SUXX $ 146.12
Prepared,by:
BRAUER R�ASSOCIATES, I C. CONTRACTOR APPROVAL:
BY /(1( ;, ;—..t ;F I }_; ; (.: ORFEI & SONS, INC.
DATE: /l c,,q•c„``.C`-Z7 , 1971--'-- BY 7�4•ieet.._.����.,
DATE ..28' `72,v-' , 19/_2_-_,
4 ER APPROVAL:
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
BY
TO: Robert P. Heinrich, Village Manager
. FROM: John D. Frane, Finance Director
DATE: December 26, 1972
RE: Vouchers to be presented for approval at the 12/26/72 Council Meeting
1146 Metro Sewer Board, $6142.08. Our monthly charges for service have been
reduced$1,800 per month for 1973 due to the initiation of the SAC
charge.
1165 ICreig Letter Co., $642.10. Printing of the fall Bond Prospectus.
1166 M.A.M., Inc., $622.40. Public Safety project decals.
1196 Wickes Homes, Inc., $9,275.00. Annex Unit. $1,000 is being
retained for correction of possible structural defects.
1198 Brauer &Associates. See invoices.
Contractor's Payments
1184 Lee Richert, $23,925.00. Well II and Buildings. This project
• is 100% complete with $6,758 being retained.
1201 Northern Contracting, $65,317.82. Final payment on our first trunk
water project.
1202 Northern Contracting, $23,500.00. Final payment on the Nine Mile I
Sewer Project. This amount will be paid to us by Metro Sewer.
ID
1
.d
. December 26, 1972
State of Minnesota
County of Hennepin
Village of Eden Prairie
Minutes of the Board of Audit
The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows:
Year - 1972
Date Voucher# Name Item Amount
12/12 1014 Cancelled Replaced by 1140 (70.00)
1140 Mary Haagens Girls Rec. Instruction 70.00
1141 Michael&Patricia
Allman. Easement 140.50
12/13 1142 Hennepin County League December 14th Meeting 14.00
1143 Richard J. Bren Village Hall Maintenancw 140.00
12/15 1144 Postmaster Newsletter Mailing 76.37
1145 George Mauer Corst. Utility Refund 1,000.00
114-6 Metro Sewer Board Sewer Charges 642.08
1147 Dept. of Public Safety License Plates for
Plymouth Fury 1.25
12/18 1148 Dept. of Public Safety Addl. ' 2.00
• 12/20 1149 Raymond Stodola Easement 385.50
1150 Kenneth B. Anderson Easement 585.00 1
1151 Leslie Blacklock Option - Anderson Lakes
Property 1,000.00
1152 Dept. of Public Safety License Plates for
P1mouth Fury & Satellite 6.50
12/26 1153 Apple Valley Red-E-Mix Material for V. Hall Annex 49.75
1154 Brock-White Co. 41.40
1155 John, Cosmano Fee for December 56.88
1156 A. B. Dick Products Service on Mimeo 21.55
1157 Dorholt Printing Office Supplies 238.76
Public Safety & Office
1158 John K. Hacking Public Safety Dept. 20.09
Expenses
1159 Mark Hurd Topog Map 442.20
1160 Itasca Equipment Repair Parts 18.00
1161 IBM Typewriter 504.00
1162 ICMA Handbooks 7.50
1163 Void Replaced ty 1164
1164 Justus Lumber Co. Material for Public Works
Bldg. 21.57
1165 Krieg Letter Co. Prospectus for Bond Sale 642.10
1166 M.A.M., Inc. Forms Printed for 622.40
Public Safety Dept.
1167 John McCulloch Fee for December 56.88
1168 Joan Meyers Fee for December 56.88
• 1169 City of Minneapolis Urban Corp - Jerry Femrite 90.00
1170 Minneapolis Gas Village Hail 54.33
• 1171 Minnesota Fire Supplies for Fire Dept. 5.00
9
1172 Minn-Wisc. Truck Line Freight on Checks 6.26.69
1173 Mobil Oil Diesel Fuel
411 Board of Audit
December 26, 1972
Page Two
1
Date Voucher# Name Item Amount
12/26 1174 Mobile Radio Engineering Labor & Parts to
Change Tone &Frequency
Fire Equipment 282.50
1175 Modern Tire Co. Tire Repairs 4.50
1176 Motor Parts Serv. Repair Parts 30.29
1177 Wm. Mueller & Sons Street Material 193.64
1178 MASCO Hats& Liners for Park,
Engineer, Bldg. Dept.
&Manager 40.25
1179 Ralph J. Nesbitt Fee for December 56.88
1180 Northern States Power Electric 1,184.28
1181 Postmaster Annual Bulk Mailing Fee 30.00
1182 Richard Putnam November Expenses 117.93
1183 Paul R. Redpath Fee for December &
League Dinner 83.84
1184 Lee Richert Plbg. Wells #1 & 2 23,925.00
1185 Gene Schurman December Expenses 3.00
1186 Dennis Siegle Expenses for Interview 64.88
Engineer
1187 Soil Engineering Borings & Tests _
III Mitchell Road, Gerard Drive
Holly Road 613.00
1188 Special Screening Police Car Embloms 100.00
1189 Sun Newspapers Legals 33.34
1190 Taylor's Manufacturing Bumpers for Police Car 56.53
1191 Tonka Kennels, Inc. November Service 82.25
1192 Twin City Testing Water Samples - Testing 140.10
1193 Typewriter Sales Calculator 119.95
1194 Uniforms Unlimited Twrinsonic Light -
Public Safety 151.20
1195 U. of M. Building Officials
Institute 70.00
1196 Wickes Homes, Inc. Village Hall Annex 9,275.00
L197 Zerox Corp. Rental 207.33
1198 Brauer & Assoc. Services - Scenic Hgts.
Road, Mitchell Rd. Impr.,
Parkway Design, Red Rock
Sub.Trunk, Nine Mile A,
Topview, etc. 14,733.24
1199 Forstner Fire App. Fire Dept. Supplies 66.40
1200 Perbix, Harvey Legal for Oct. & Nov. 2,352.63
62,352.63
1201 Northern Contracting Mains 1A
1202 Northern Contracting Nine Mile 1 - Final 23,500.00
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS.... 149,900.91
f
Joe
RESOLUTION NO. 623
RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING UNENCUMBERED
1972 APPROPRIATION BALANCES AND AUTHORIZING
TRANSFER FROM POOR FUND TO GENERAL FUND.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of
Eden Prairie, County of Hennepin, Minnesota as follows:
Section I The transfer of balances from the 1972 budget is authorized
and directed in the amount indicated:
Appropriation - Decrease
• Legal Service - Criminal Matters $1,000
Engineering 7,000
Inspection 2,000
Animal Control 3,000
Street 8,100
Teen Activities 1,800
Employee Benefits 1.800
$24,700
Revenues - Increase
Fire Service 700
Swimming &Admissions 2,600
Skill Development 1,900
Concessions 2,600
Organized Athletics 1,300
Fines 3,500
Other Revenues 2.985
15,585
Encumbrances at 1/1/72:
Fire Department Commodities 1,015
Park Planning 1,000,
2,015
$42,300
n,,solution No. 023
Section II The transfer of the unencumbered balances authorized by
Section I into the following 1972 budget appropriations is authorized
and directed in the amount indicated:
Management $ 4,400
General Administration 1,900
Financial Control and Purchasing 500
Legal Services -Civil Matters 1,000
Elections 200
Assessing 1,800
Police Protection 3,500
Fire Protection 4,200
Health 1,500
Public Works Supervision 600
Snow and Ice Removal 2,000
Recreation Administration 2,900
Swimming 1,800
Recreational Skill Development 1,400
Organized Athletics 1,100
Concessions 600
Park Maintenance 1,700
Shared Services and Supplies 2,000
Village Hall 100
LOGIS 9,100
$42,300
Section III That revenues received during 1972 for the Public Safety
Program and the first half of the 1972 Federal Revenue Sharing be used
to fund expenditures during 1972 for the 1973 Public Safety Program and
that any balance be carried forward into 1973 Revenues.
Section IV That 1972 unexpended Capital Improvements for park improvement
be carried forward into the 1973 program budget.
Section V That 1972 unexpended Capital Improvements and encumbrances
at 1/1/72 be carried forward into the 1973 program budget.
ADOPTED by the Village Council on December 26, 1972.
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST:
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk
SEAL
•
RESOLUTION URGING THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMMISSIONERS TO RECOGNIZE/
THE SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING BOARD AS THE OFFICIAL
ROMAN SERVICES PLANNING UNIT FOR SOUTH SUBURBAN HENNEPIN COU TY 1
AND TO IMMEDIATELY COMMIT COUNTY RESOURCES TO THE PROVISION OF ,
PROGRAMS OF SERVICE RECOMMENDED BY THE SOUTH HENNEPIN BOA .
WHEREAS, the City e�-�loomir+gton ;s, along with lelen-Pra4414., dine and i
Richfield, a member of the South Hennepin Human Se ces Planning
Board, which is formed under the Joint Powers Act; and
` WHEREAS, the South•Hennepin Human Services Planning Boarl has made an
evaluation of the human service needs in the uth suburban area,
as well as an inventory of existing services upon which recom-
mendations regarding priorities of action b the County may be
formulated; and ,
WHEREAS,there is now sufficient information to Anable the County to
initiate some of the needed programs service in the south •
suburban area;
Cis e�-( .-
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Ci-t uncil of the n
in regular meeting assembled, th the Hennepin County Commissioners
are urged to recognize the Sout Hennepin Human Services Planning
• Board as the official human se ices planning unit for the south
suburban area of Hennepin Cou y, including the communities of 1
Bloomington, Eden Prairie, E na and Richfield, and to commit
County funds and other resources to the provision of needed
. programs of service as recohmended by the South Hennepin Human
Services Planning Board.
Passed and adopted this feurth—day of December, 1972.
/'
/ - / /G/ r G�
Attest
w
1 ' ' /
e / •,l Ir�—iwl:: ':' •, /,
.ice :.Y /
City Clerk
i , /a
eiri<2- )74°
VILLAGE OF EVEN PRAIRIE dnti
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA t
ORDINANCE NO. 198
_ AN ORDINANCE REGULATING AND LICENSING SCAVENGERS,
REQUIRING PERMITS AND IMPOSING A PENALTY.
THE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Definition. The term Scavenger, as used in this ordinance
means a person, firm or corporation in the business of removing the •
contents, or part of the contents, of any privy, privy box, vault,
sink, cesspool, or septic tank within the Village of Eden Prairie.
Section 2. Application for and Issuance of License; Bond. Any person
desiring to act or render services as a scavenger within the Village
shall make application for a license to the Village Council, accompanied
by a license fee and a bond. Such application shall be verified by the
oath of the applicant and shall state:
(a) The name and address of the applicant.
(b) If the applicant is not an individual, the names and addresses
of all officers or other persons in control of the firm or
.
corporation making application.
(c) A description of the equipment which the applicant proposes to
use for scavenging within the Village.
(d) License fee shall be as stated in separate license and fee
schedule ordinance.
Each application shall be accompanied by a bond using Village bond forms
in the sum of $2,000.00 in favor of the Village and the public conditioned
upon compliance by the applicant with all laws of the State and ordinances
of the Village pertaining to the conduct of the business of a scavenger and
faithful performance of the contract. Upon approval of the application by
the Village Council, the Clerk shall issue a license to the applicant which
shall expire on the 1st day of January next following.
Section 3. Liability Insurance for Scavengers. The applicant shall also
furnish proof that policy of public liability insurance has been procured
by him during the license period, for death or personal injury arising
therefrom to any person or persons, in the amount of $100,000.00 for each
person and $300,000.00 for each incident, and for damage to property
arising from any incident in the amount of not less than $50,000.00.
Section 4. Approved Sites. No discharge of waste from septic tanks or
other similar facilties, whether by a person or a local government unit,
shall be made unless such discharge is made at a site previously approved by
the Chief Administrator of the Metro Sewer Board.
• Ordinance No. 198
Page 2
Section 5. Permit Required. 3efore rendering services as a scavenger
to any premises in the Village, the scavenger shall obtain a permit in
— writing from the Village Clerk, which shall contain the name of the +-
owner or occupant and the address of the premises. The fee for each
such permit shall be as stated in separate license and fee schedule
ordinance. In case of an emergency, the scavenger may render services
at any premises without a permit, provided verbal notification is given
in advance to the Village Clerk, if the emergency occurs within regular
business hours, and provided a permit is obtained on the next business
day.
Section 6. Location of Equipr:ent. No scavenger shall place, store,
keep or maintain any wagons, vehicles, receptacles, vessels or utensils
used in connection with his business in any place in the Village without
first securing the written consent of all owners of property located
within a radius of 200 feet of such place and in addition, he shall
comply with all applicable zoning and other ordinances, statutes and
regulations.
Section 7. Scavenging Equipment. All substances removed from any privy,
privy box, cesspool, septic tank or other vault used as part of a sanitary
sewer system shall be conveyed to the place of disposal in tanks or other
• receptacles constructed of a metal or other non-porous material provided
with at least two manholes on the top thereof and an outlet at the bottom,
adequately capped to prevent any leakage.
Section 8. Overnight Storage. No receptacle, tank or vehicle containing
any substance such as described in the preceding section may be stored
overnight in any place in the Village.
Section 9. SS illin . No substance such as described in Section 6 shall
be allowed to spill, splash, leak or become deposited on any public street
or alley, or on the surface of the ground.
Section 10. Owner Responsibility. No person shall employ any other than
a scavenger licensed hereunder for the purpose of cleaning any privy vault,
cesspool or septic tank situated on property within the Village owned,
rented, operated or managed by such person.
Section 11. Penalty. Any person violating this ordinance shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor, punishable by a sentence of imprisonment of not more
than 90 days or to payment of a fine of not more than $300.00. Such penalty
may be imposed in addition to revocation or suspension of license.
First read December 12, 1972. Adopted by the Council of the Village of
Eden Prairie this 26th day of December, 1972.
ATTEST:
Paul R. Redpath,Mayor
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk
70: Xayor and k.pf :den Prairie Vile Catmcil
Village Xar.ager•,,,*•:'%`;
rit7Z: Deft:m.0er 22, 1972
SUat;ECT: Zmployee Compensation Program
Con.pa nsa ti on adjustnier.ts as r eco.-..r.ondeci re.7.•.ect juar..;cment aar
performar.ce, ccmiparanle and pr;VF,',:C.? pay rates,
professional development, experience and other factors that :
uVC should be considered in esta'elishing ea„;p,easation levels.
I.:orks employees are represented ay Loce: 49 of too in'aernaCional
Union of Opt:rating Engineers. Local 49 this past week settled for a
base salary increase of $37. o. a.ost commapities this reoresented
aporoximate percentage increase of 4. . n addition sane ad,justments
.fringe heaefits may be c..ar.agement r.c.:.otitzing team, of
ci I r.n a member, have urged me:oiler nanicipa-iities to minimize fringe
0a.ief-; adjustn...:!nts. Eden Prairie was one co'..,a;nitic.:.; chat
rc.prest..?nted by the team for contract lar.gda.:;e negotiations, hut noy....v.,one
Eden Prairie2u;,;',c :-.ave'aeen
coindensated at a. lower than the anouth iaatiCced rate (1572 :;egotia-ted
;(&tc, !;„Wl5 - 1072 in Prairie Rate fe175). I at, presently necjotiating
with the 49 er's to develop a multi year plan of compensation austmeot
eveatually result in parlay with other municinallties.
, cause of the negotiations presently underway, the resolution settinc,
:..c.*i.,%y adjustment for employees does rca inclade adjLstments for Puhlic
Works personnel.
iv, the ?ublif Works personnel are making the transition from rural pay
v.:ls to ur;)an pay levels so it is with many of the other Villace
,.„,;)1,:,yees. Review of toe 1972 Metropoli.ton Area salary Survey (copies
report were provided to a;, COlinCi;ri,an about three months acc.)
I c;eaionstrate this fziet. Tic reco.imendec.; ;,ay levels of
constitute not only a cost of living adjustment (Minnea)olis -
i'aul cost of living is up 3.1% •'or the past 12 montas) but a "catcn-up"
ce; ...Jell as merit adustments. Several employees will ;le
cr.a..i.n.'“o for nant increases July 1, 1973. Gm-ann A employes are t'oose
oyaes receiving increases over present co,hnensation levels for which
.'un ; were provided in the Contingency Appropriation. Grow) 3 employees
1)72 budgeted positions. Group C eiTol aye,.? is tile 1972 budgeted posit'.on
Z.ngineer for which an ir.crease of $1,500 frail S16,500-S13,060
rehues ted.
7;,e reccznended adjustments for the Engineering Assistant and Foreman
nal tide the grivilege of using a village pickup for transportation to
from work. Taking municipal vehicles home is not an uncommon practice
';'win Cities if restricted to a certain class of employees and a
reasonahle distance from work. 1K_
VILLAGE O, EDEN PRAIRIE
VILLAGE Ka,: (7.:R'S
REC0 T' iDEED EY2LOYEZ SALARY PLA"!
Position 1972 Salary R..coriiended 1973 Salary. 2r':'.' };
Mnn'eniy 1^nic or -••V ' krli)
Forcxwn 950 11,400 1,Goo 12,000 .3
0i ciirj Inspector 1.025 12,303 1,075-1,125 13,200 7.0
.111.oiring Inspector 950 11,400 1.O00 1. 12,000 5.3
P. Director 1.050 12,630 1.";50-1,175 13,800 9.5
Assessor 1,125 13,500 1.175-1,225 14,400 6.7
cleric° Assistant 1.100 13,200 1 125-1 150 13.650 ,
8a.jir.c:ri;;g Tocllanician 7ii0 8,400 750 2. 9.000 7.
C1,.:r..-5ook::eeper 700 3,400 72R 3. 8,73F •G'
A1;ainistrative Sec. 700 8.400 749 4. 8.341 5.3
21a.;res- 850 10,200 1 .050 12.000 17.
Fic,...iice Di rector 1,365 16.333 1.450 17.400 6.2
Clerical 400 4 800 420 5,040 ::,.0 I
Subtotal A 130.980 140,067 6.9
Grano u
Public Sa7ety Officer
One (1) 1 ,000-1,025 12,150 '
One (1) 1 .025-1.050 12,300 -
Three (5) 1 ,050-1,075 12,750 -
P ublic Safety Director 1.300 15.600 -
JobyU1.GI 52,800
r-a:; C
V i 11„r,,; Engineer 1.375 16,500 1,500 18,000 -
* Pfeetive January 1, 1973
** „eri t increase July 1, 1973 (not automatic)
1. i•f six months probation period ending March 11. 1973 is successfully completed,
a 6a increase is granted.
2. If six months probation period ending March 25, 1973 is successfully canpieted,
u3 increase is !ranted.
3. A three percent (3%) increase was granted in Sentenber, 1972.
4. I� six month probation period ending April 1, 1973 is successfully completed, a
6i.: increase is granted.
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 620
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHIP:r
MAXIMLI4 SALARIES AND WAGES
FOR VILLAGE EMPLOYEES FOR THE
YEAR 1973
BE IT RESOLVED that the maximum salaries and wages for Village
Employees for the year 1973 be established as follows:
Section I.
Title Annual Salary
Foreman 12,000
Building Inspector 13,200
Plumbing Inspector 12,000
Park Director 13,800
Assessor 14,400
Engineering Assistant 13,650
Engineering Technician 9,000
Clerk-Bookkeeper 8,736
Administrative Secretary 8,841
Planner 12,000
Finance Director 17,400
Clerical 5,040
Public Safety Officer One(1) 12,150
One(1)
Three (3) 12,750
Public Safety Director 15,600
Section II.
Adjustments to the appropriated Program Budget accounts
fran the Contingency Account are hereby authorized.
ADOPTED by the Village Council on December 26, 1972
Paul R. Redpath, l4ayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk
DATE: January 5, 1973
TO: Mayor and Village Council
PROM: Robert P. Heinrich, Village Manager
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROGRAM
Attached is a copy of the Eden Prairie Job Description, Qualifications,
and Compensation for the position of Community Education Coordinator
as proposed by the Community Education Task Force (you've previously
received a copy of the Task Force's Progress Report).
The State Department of Education has informed us that to maintain our
eligibility for the $5,000 Grant programmed for us, we need to implement
the program immediately (in fact, by January 1, 1973). In light of
this ultimatum, Mr. Walt Richardson, Mr. Marty Jessen and I have a
candidate for this job that we feel is an excellent man for the position.
Re has outstanding qualifications and good experience in this type of
program. His starting salary would be $10,800/year.
He would "officially" be on the School District's payroll and be
covered under their "fringe benefit" plan. Re would probably be
officed at the Village Hall.
There presently is $2,500 in the 1973 Park and Recreation Administration
Program Budget for the Community Education Coordinator. Due to the
change in concept as to what the Community Education Program will
entail, the need for increased recreation program supervision will not
'be fulfilled as proposed it. the original. 1973 Budget.
Bated on the Task Force's recommendation, it seems appropriate to
establish a separate program budget for Community Education Services.
Therefore the attached budget is proposed for this program. The
Village's share of the program is $5,581.50 with $2,500 of this to
be "in kind" clerical work rather than direct cash outlay. The remaining
$3,081.50 would be paid to the School District and they will disburse it and
keep records. The $2,500 in the Recreation Administration budget may
be transferred to this account plus an additional $581.50 from the
contingency reserve,
•
A 3
ti
COMMUNITY SERVICES RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Page Two
4-
Other Program Related Expenses
P.E.R.A. (4.52 of Salary) $ 486.00
F.LC.A. (5.852 of Salary) 631.80
Employee Insurance 595.20
$1,713.00
TOTAL COST $16.163
Sources of Revenue:
State Grant $5,000
School District 5,581.50
Village 5,581.50
CODE
FUND GENERAL
FUNCTION COrDUUNITY EDUCATION
AREA ADMINISTRATION
PROGRAM COMMUNITY SERVICES RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Actual Actual Budget First a Estimate Proposed
1970 1971 1972 1972 1972 1973
$ $ $ $ $ $
1. Personal Cervice
resmnuen1 ty RAurnt4 sin Cnnrerf r.a rnr $10.800
Secretary (1!1 time) 2.500
$ 13,300 $ 13.300
2. Contractual Service
Conferences and Schools $ 500
Publications and References 200
Mileage 300
$ 1,000 $ 1, 00
3. Commodities
nnppll.aa 150
$ 150 $ 150
TOTAL $ 14�4'�'_�
iDGN
JOB DESCRIPTION, OUAL;FICAT;ONS, AND COMPENSATION
FOR THE POSITION OF
COMMUNITY EDUCATION COORDINATOR
I. Job Description:
The Community Education Coordinator will work for the Superintendent of
Schools and Village Manager in coordinating human service programs to
efficiently meet community needs.
Specifically the Community Education Coordinator will:
*Survey needs of Eden Prairie citizens in the human services area.
*Based upon needs assessment, design a skeletal program which
meets the needs and is capable of being developed and implemented
by the appropriate sponsoring agency.
*Obtain a commitment from the appropriate sponsoring agency to
develop and implement the program.
*Establish an evaluation framework for all human services programs.
*Work with sponsoring agency to insure program implementation.
Community Education program components are as follows:
*K-1 2 School Enrichment Programs -A supplemental program to broaden
the range of offerings to include high interest activities not normally
found in the regular curriculum.
*Adult Basic Education- Program of classes for adults, age 16 and
over not presently enrolled in school. The courses include math,
spelling, reading, writing, and English for the foreign born.
*General Equivalency Diploma Preparation Classes -A program for
adults, age 19 and older, which prepares the student to take the
General Equivalency Diploma (G.E.D. examination which is offered
by the Federal Government).
*Adu It High School Diploma Program-A program of courses designed
to enable adults (age 16 and over who have not been enrolled in
school for a full year previous to entry) to earn a high school diploma.
*Gen eral Adult Education-Learning activities/courses are offered in
response to the general interests of the adult community.
e .
•
Job Description, Qualifications, and Compensation
Community Education Coordinator
Page 2
*Leisure Education - Skill development programs stressing leisure
habits of life-long value.
*Recreation -Activity programs for citizens of all ages stressing only
the value of the activity and subsequent enjoyment the participant
realizes.
*Public Safety
*Public Health Counselling services for community residents.
*Welfare
*Co-ordination with Other Agencies -Work with the Voc ational-
Technical School, Junior College, and Industries to meet special
needs identified in the community.
The Community Education Coordinator will work with program managers
for the School District and Village in developing and implementing detailed
programs to meet community needs. Emphasis is on research, coordination,
and evaluation rather than specific implementation.
II. Job Qualifications;
Bachelor's Degree from an accredited college or university preferred.
Ability in communication and human relations.
Knowledge of Community Education and its implications for the School
District and Village in meeting community needs.
Ability in basic research techniques including needs assessment, data
gathering, interpretation of findings, evaluation methods, etc.
Ability to design skeletal program to achieve Community Education
goals.
Organization ability.
Experience and/or training in education, recreation, community relations,
social work, administration, or related fields desirable.
•
•
Job Description, Qualifications, and Compensation
Community Education Coordinator
Page 3
III. Compensation:
*Salary-- $9,000-11,000 depending on experience and qualifications.
*Auto Allowance
*Group Health
*Two-week paid Vacation
DATE: January 3, 1973
TO: Village Council
THRU: Robert P. Heinrich, Village Mir:agga:
FROM: John Frane, Finance Director
SUBJECT: WATER METER BIDS
Bids were opened for various sizes of water,etea on December 15. 1972.
This recommendation is for the 5/8" x 3/4" sae only, the meter usually
installed in a single family dwelling" A:eco=e:da:on oon larger size
meters will be forthcoming. The bids were as follows:
Bidder: Badger Rockwer.
Price: $38.50 533.35 538.77
Water Products Company, bidding t e Rockwell) meter, will repair these
meters at no cost to the Village no ratter wr.a: t:,e case for a period of
5 years. This additional service would allow t:e Viilarye to delay the time
when it would be necessary to employ persons to repair water meters.
The convenient location of Water Products Co., is the Village, also allows
us to reduce our meter inventory.
We, therefore, recommend that the 5/8"x 3/4' zeters hid be awarded to
Water Products bidding the Rockwell meter.
JF:kg
/a
i
DATE: January 3, 1973
TO: Village Council
THRU: Robert P. Heinrich, Village Manager
FROM: John Frane, Finance Director
SUBJECT: WATER METER BIDS
Bids were opened for various sizes of water meters on December 15, 1972.
This recommendation is for the 5/8" x 3/4" size only, the meter usually
installed in a single family dwelling. A recommendation on larger size
meters will be forthcoming. The bids were as follows:
Bidder: Badger Neptune Rockwell
Price: $38.50 $39.85 $38.77
Water Products Company, bidding the Rockwell meter, will repair these
meters at no cost to the Village no matter what the cause for a period of
5 years. This additional service would allow the Village to delay the time
when it would be necessary to employ persons to repair water meters.
The convenient location of Water Products Co., in the Village, also allows
us to reduce our meter inventory.
We, therefore, recommend that the 5/8"x 3/4" meters bid be awarded to
Water Products bidding the Rockwell meter.
JF:kg
4,
TO: Robert P. Heinrich, Village Manager
FROM: John D. Franc, Finance Director
DATE: January 9, 1973
RE: Vouchers to be presented for approval at the 1/9/73 Council Meeting
Contract Payment
1207 Brown- Minneapolis Tank, $9,681.32. Estimate No. 4 on the Reservoir
tank. This project is now 85%complete,
•
1208 Peter Lemetti, $38,792.44. Estimate No. 3 on the Lincoln Lens, Puller,
Westgate Project. This project is now 52% complete.
1209 Lametti d.racns, $71,903.55. Estimate No. 2 on the Mitchell Heights
Sewer Bub System. This project is now 67% complete.
1210 0rfei end Sone, $149,323.25. Estimate No. 10 on Section I of the
ccaprehensive Water end Sewer Program. This project is 96% complete.
1211 0rfei end Sone, $3,113.15. Estimate No. 11 on Section II of the
ccaprebensive Water end Sewer Program. This project is 85% couplets.
1212 0rfei end Sone, $3,109.06. Estimate No. 12 on Section III of the
canprebensive Water end Sewer Prograa. This project is now 90%
complete.
Other Payments
1222 Village of Edina, $85.42. Water quality testing.
1224 Ehlers end Associate, $3,870.59. Services for fall bond sale.
Ski Club expenses are 100% financed from escrowed receipts.
I
January 9, 1973
State of Minnesota
County of Hennepin
Village of Eden Prairie
Minutes of the Board of Audit
_-._ The following accounts were audited end allowed as follows:
Year - 1973
Voucher # Name Item Amount
1203 Void
1204 Henry and Rose Kopesky Contract for Deed $ 18,000.00
1205 Postmaster Mailing 76.56
1206 Insty Prints Forms 20.30
1207 Brown-Mpls. Tank Reservoir 9,681.32
1208 " Peter Lametti Utility Contract 38,792.44
1209 Lametti and Sons " " 71,903.55
1210 Lametti and Sons it it 149,323.25
1211 Orfei end Sons " it 3,113.15
1212 0rfei end Sons " " 3,109.36
1213 A & H Welding Sheet Metal 13.07
1214 Byron Anderson Ski Club Services 24.75
1215 Brauer & Assoc. Engineering Services 2,695.65
1216 Bestos Products Pump for Cars 13.35
1217 Bituminous Roadways Heft 10.00
1218 Black&Veatch Engineering Services 1,800.00
1219 Chapin Publishing Co. Ad for Construction Project 28.20
1220 Crown Rubber Stamp Nameplates 25.45
1221 Karl Dirkers Ski Club Services 10.00
1222 Village of Edina Water Semple Testing 85.42
1223 Eden Prairie Schools Bus Rental-Summer Progreso 510.20
1224 Ehlers & Assoc. Fall Bond Sale 3,870.59
1225 John Fran Expense & Mileage 31.10
1226 Edna Holmgren Mileage 1.80
1227 Robert P. Heinrich Expenses end Car Allowance 126.85
1228 John Hacking Public Safety Expenses 26.77
1229 Hoigearda Inc. Ski Club Supplies 25.00
1230 Harold Jessen Expenses &Mileage 70.05
1231 Louis Jeska Mileage 51.30
1232 Protect-Aire Front-Rear Seat Dividers
for Patrol Cars 77.90
1233 Kenneth Kuhniy Wiring Patrol Cars 30.00
1234 Kokesh Athletic Athletic Supplies 1.50
1235 Kraemer's Hardware Supplies 71.88
1236 League of Women Voters Map Work 4.50
1237 Metro Printing Dec. Newsletter Printing 24.E j
1238 Mpls. Typewriter Typewriter Rental 50.00
Service
1239 Mple. Gas Co. 378.93
1240 Mobil Oil Heating Feel-Teen Center 21.45
Board of Audit
January 9, 1973
Page Two
Voucher# Name Item Amount
1241 N. W. National Bank Interest 67,887.50
1242 MASCO Firemen's Boats 108.24
1243 Madisen Pub. Co. Grounds Maint. Book 7.50
1244 Wolfgang Penzel Expenses 7.00
1245 Mike Rogers Ski Club Services 3.39
1246 • Richfield Plumbing Water& Sever Service
to Annex 473.00
1247 St. Paul Stamp Works Dog Tags 32.10
1248 Suburban Henn. Cty. Relief December 30.00
1249 Suburban Engineering Service Baker-Mitchell Rd. 1,924-.00
1250 Keith Wall Maps 1.25
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ... 374,573.62
•
is
Cs"
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIR.
FINANCIAL REPORT
• DECEMBER 31, 1972
Cash Balances:
General and Special Revenue Funds $ 428,984
Capital Projects (Improvements) (608 740)
t _ Park Acquisition and Development 49,978
Debt Service Funds 956,614
Utility Funds 48,417
As of 12/31/72 $2,092,733
Disposition of Cash:
Certificates of Deposit 1,340,000
Cash in Bank (per book) (10,019)
Savings Account 762,752
$2,092..733
Expenditures presented for approval at the Council Meeting of
January 9, 1973 total$374,574. These expenditures will be
met by the following sources of funds;
Cash in Bank (10,019)
Savings Account 384,593
$ 374.574
JDF
1/4/73
a (r�
..r
RESOLUTION NO. 623
RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING UNENCUMBERED
1972 APPROPRIATION BALANCES AND AUTHORIZING
TRANSFER FROM POOR FUND TO GENERAL FUND.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of
Eden Prairie, County of Hennepin, Minnesota as follows:
Section 1 The transfer of balances from the 1972 budget is authorized
and directed in the amount indicated:
Appropriation - Decrease
Legal Service -Criminal Matters $1,000
Engineering 7,000
Inspection 2,000
Animal Control 3,000
Street 8,100
Teen Activities 1,800
Employee Benefits 1,800
$24,700
Revenues - Increase
Fire Service 700
Swimming &Admissions 2,600
Skill Development 1,900
Concessions 2,600
Organized Athletics 1,300
Fines 3,500
Other Revenues 2,985
15,585
Encumbrances at 1/1/72.
Fire Department Commodities 1,015
Park Planning 1,000
2 1
Resoltion No. 623
Sects n Ij The transfer of the unencumbered balances authorized by
Section I into the following 1972 budget appropriations is authorized
and directed in the amount indicated:
Management $ 4,400
General Administration 1,900
Financial Control and Purchasing 500
Legal Services -Civil Matters 1,000
Elections 200
Assessing 1,800
Police Protection 3,500
Fire Protection 4,200
Health 1,500
Public Works Supervision 600
Snow and Ice Removal 2,000
Recreation Administration 2,900
Swimming 1,800
Recreational Skill Development 1,400
Organized Athletics 1,100
Concessions 600
Park Maintenance 1,700
Shared Services and Supplies 2,000
Village Hall 100
LOGIS 9,100
$42,300
Section III That revenues received during 1972 for the Public Safety
Program and the first half of the 1972 Federal Revenue Sharing be used
to fund expenditures during 1972 for the 1973 Public Safety Program and
that any balance be carried forward into 1973 Revenues.
Section IV That 1972 unexpended Capital Improvements for park improvement
be carried forward into the 1973 program budget.
Section V That 1972 unexpended Capital Improvements and encumbrances
at 1/1/72 be carried forward into the 1973 program budget. •
ADOPTED by the Village Council on December 26, 1972.
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST:
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk
SEAL
. .�.• s.
I `
.
: ? '
Attached are complete rosters of the Eden Prairie Village Boards,
Commissions, Task Forces, Committees and Councils.
1/3/73
i
PLANNING COMMISSION
Home
Telephone Term Expires
Council Representative:
Joan Meyers 938-1447
6930 Boyd Avenue
Eden Prairie 55343
Richard Lynch 941-2792 12/31/75
11426 Leona Road
Eden Prairie 55343
Wayne Brown 944-2555 12/31/75
8920 County Road 18
Eden Prairie 55343
M. E. Lane 941-1669 12/31/74
6961 Alpine Trail
Eden Prairie 55343
Norma Schee 941-4207 12/31/74
7288 Prairie View Drive
Eden Prairie 55343
Donald Sorensen 941-4078 12/31/73
7121 Willow Creek Road
• Eden Prairie 55343
Don Teslow 941-3441 12/31/73 ?
14308 N. Charing Cross
Eden Prairie 55343
Ordinance provides:
7 members: 6 citizen freeholders who have been residents of Village of Eden
Prairie for at least 3 years, for terms of 3 years.
1 member of the Village Council, for whatever term the Council desires.
Terms commence on January 1.
f .
PARK&RECREATION COMMISSION •
s.
Home
Ind. School Dist. # 272 Telephone Term Expires
Paul A. Emblom 941-1231 12/31/75 1
10610 Valley View Rd.
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Village Council Representative
Vacant 3 Yr. Term
Anderson, Richard 941-3078 12/31/75
14208 Charing Cross
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Garens, William 941-3399 12/31/75
6897 Castle Lane
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Berkland, Janet 941-7041 12/31/74
7760 Heritage Road
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Fields, Terry 941-4031 12/31/74
7141 Prairie View Drive
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Blacklock, Frances 944-2511 12/31/73
9420 Timber Trail
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Erickson, Marvin 941-1577 12/31/73
14117 Holly Road
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Holasek, Dean 941-1138 12/31/73
6415 Rowland Road
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Youth Members
mach, Steven 941-5216 4/30/73
6629 Manchester Lane
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Vacant 3 Yr. Term
PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION CONT.
Ordinance provides;
11 members; 1 member from Ind. School Dist.#272 for a 3 year term.
I member from Village Council, appointed by Council, for a 3 year term.
9 at large members, 7 adults for a 3 year term and 2 young people of
high school age for 1 year terms.
One of the thove must be a woman and one must be a member of the
Eden Prairie Athletic Association. Adult member's terms begin on
January 1;young people' s terms begin on May 1.
•
•
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION •
Council Representatives; Home
Telephone Term Expires
Fenzel,Wolfgang 935-7010 12/31/73
6932 Barberry Lane
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Connuaghty, Curtis 941-4331 12/31/75
11860 Sunnytbrook Road
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
•
Pennie, Dorothy 944-1038 12/31/75
9599 Bluff Road
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Williams, Robert 941-7972 12/31/75
16600 Luther Way
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Beal, Eleanor 933-4271 12/31/74
15820 Oak Ridge Road
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Teslow, Lounell 941-3441 12/31/74
14308 N.Charing Cross
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Vacant 12/31/74
Gartner,Virginia 941-1803 12/31/73
15901 Cedar Ridge Road
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Holland,William 941-2521 12/31/73
12774 Gordon Drive
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Schuck,Judy 941-2474 12/31/73
7286 Topview Road
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Student - Vacant 4/30/74
Student - Vacant 4/30/74
fr.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION CONT.
MEMBERS& TERMS: HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
Ordinance provides:
12 members: 1 member from Village Council, to be elected by the Council.
9 members at large, for 3 year terms.
2 members to be young people of high school age, to serve 1 year terms.
Adult terms commence January 1; young people's terms begin May 1.
BOARD OF APPEALS
Home
Telephone Term Expires
Choiniere, Paul 938-2167 12/31/73 .
15819 N. Eden Drive
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Hirt, Anthony 938-8530 12/31/7.
6533 Kurtz Lane
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
E Miller, Jerrold 941-4257 12/31/73•.
7120 Gerard Drive
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Pauly, Roger 941-2991 12/31/73 ,
17450 West 78th Street
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Wedlund, James 941-3359 12/31/73
16211 N. Hillcrest Court
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
1
1
By-laws provide for 1 year terms.
h
OTHER COMMISSIONS &BOARDS
C A T V Study Commission Home
Telephone Term Expires
I" Joan Meyers 938-1447 No expiration date
6930 Boyd Ave.
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Village Manager
C ATV Citizen Advisory Committee
John I. Lovas ..
James F. Flavin ..
Kay Frick
Suburban Rate Authority
Director:Carl Jullie for 1973
Alternate Director: John McCulloch
South Hennepin Human Service Council
Wolfgang Fenzel 1/31/74
Robert Heinrich 1/31/74
Dr. George Tangenan I/3 1/75
Vacant 1/31/75
Suburban League of Municipalities
Director: John McCulloch For 1973
Alternate Director: balance of council
Metro League of Municipalities
Vacant For 1974
Minnesota State Lear,ue of Municipalities
Vacant For 1974
OTHER COMMISSIONS & BOARDS CONT.
Major Center Area Task Force
See attached memo dated 11/14/73 from Village Planner to Village manager.
Village Council unanimously approved the continuation of the MCA
Tack' Force on 11/27/73.
Golf Course Study Committee
Chemical Abuse (Drug) Council)
See Attached List
MEMO:
01-DATE: November 14, 1973TO: Robert P. Heinrich, Village Manager
FROM: Dick Putnam, Village Planner
SUBJECT: MAKEUP AND DUTIES OF MAJOR CENTER AREA TASK FORCE
•
1. The Council requested that the Major Center Area Task Force be continued
and that its functions and suggested makeup be submitted to the •
Council for action.
I believe to make this group an effective advisory group in policy making for
the Major Center Area, a staff member must be assigned to work very closely
with the Task Force. It would be my recommendation that the Director of Planning
be the Staff Coordinator for the Task Force. He may
utilize other members of the Staff as the needs dictate or may assign an assistant
to work in an on-going basis with the Task Force.
I believe the Director of Planning is most qualified and would require the infor-
mation gained by working with the Task Force in his normal duties with the Village.
Also, his staff function with the Planning Commission makes for a coordinated
processing of development applications or refinements of the Major Center
development ordinances.
2. Function of the Task Force.
I believe the Task Force's major function will be to recommend policies whichcortinially
update the P.U.D. Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance for the M.C.A. This will be an
advisory function which would submit its recommendations to the
Village Planning Commission, prior to submission to the Village Council for decision.
A secoddary function will be the review of development
proposals of.significance to the Major Center Area. The definition ofgsignificance&
would be something to be determined by the Task Force members and Village officials,
in that small scale rezoning or development proposals may not dictate review by
this group,unless there was conflict with the accepted development plan. Other major
projects with over 20 acres should be considered.
3. Operation of the Task Force.
The Task Force should function not as a review authority, such as the Planning
Commission, but rather as a working group, meeting on pre-set dates to consider
development proposals or to consider amendments and changes to the Village
ordinances and policies regarding the M.C.A. The group should not be restricted
in its"future thinking" or research capabilities. I would hope that the Task Force
would stimulate new ideas and new approaches to development in the M.C.A. rather
than merely review land use plans.
The 30-60 periods for plan review in the M.C.A. (February, July, and October),
the Task Force would meet as demand dictates to review submitted development
proposals.
•
•
-2- •
During the periods of the year when development proposals are not being processed,
the Task Force should be encouraged to conduct research, ordinary review, and
creative thinking in which problems may be anticipated and solved. Through
this process, the group should not be bogged down with the "nitty-gritties" but
can concentrate on creative thinking.
•
4. Recommendations for nominations should include citizens, advisory
commission members, property owners, developers, Council members,
consultants, and staff.
I
[ r
DRUG COUNCIL
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
1. 'Paul Redpath 16308 Lincoln Lane 941-2961
2./Dr. Henry Brandt 12300 Riverview Road 941-3316
3.'Dr. Martin Peper 6996 Valley View Rd. 941-1404
4.'Nil 1 iam Geimer 14015 Crown Dr. 941-1254
5. 'Wol fgang Penzel 6932 Barberry Lane 935-7010
6. 'Brian Wilhelm 8950 Eden Prairie Rd. 941-2262
7. /Har lan Leopold 772 Grant St., Excelsior 474-3527
8. 'Richard Werpy 4518 Sterling Rd., Mound 472-3499 '
9./Mar i e St. Pierre 5039 Dominick Spur, Hopkins 935-2577
10.'Marge O'Ryan 6628 Manchester Lane 941-4159
11. 'Joan Meyers 6930 Boyd Ave. 938-1447 1 1
12. /Phyllis Kopesky 16117 Valley View 941-4619
13./Peg Johnson 6700 Kingston 941-4363
14:/Lorraine Raths 16960 So. Shore Lane 938-4349
15.'Yvonne Hargens 9060 W. Staring Lane 881-5811 941-3234
16. Audrey Gilbertson , 6850 Leesborough 941-4459
17. Geneva Middleton 9411 Timber Trail 944-2967
18. 'Tom Beckfeld 6631 Kingston 941-2739
19. /Paul Steinmetz 6435 Kurtz Lane 938-1115
20. 'ferry Fields 7141 Prairie View 941-4031
21 f Tim Pierce 15909 Town Line Rd. 933-4340
22!Donald Frankland 13945 Holly Rd. 941-2980
23.'Richard Sather 6511 Manchester Lane 941-1568
24.'tarry-Kleven— 7262-Topview-Rd — -.941-461.9
25. /Raymond Carey 6931 Boyd Ave. 938-5939
26. /Alden Keiski 15150 Scenic Heights Rd. 941-3126
-2-
27.�Jack Hacking 8950 Eden Prairie Road 944-2700
28. 'Keith Wall 8950 Eden Prairie Road 944-2700
29.'Dorothy Bennett 15809 Park Terrace Dr. 935-7628
30. 'Chuck Komschlies 15951 S. Manor Rd. 935-0949 •
31.'Mrs. Wm. McCubrey 11081 Blossom Rd. 941-5218 •
•
12/26/73 Council Meeting
C. Discussion of Bruce Brill's request for relocation of Kinad ale
Kennels south of T.N. 169/2212 and north of Riverview Road.
Hr. Heinrich reported that official notice of the public hear-
ing for zoning is needed. The notice of public hearing for
January 8 before the Council has been sent to the newspaper.
A motion was made by Fir. Penzel seconded by Fir. Boerger authori-
zing the public hearing for January 8, 1974. Motion carried
unanimously.
December 18, 1973, Planning Commission Meeting
B. Request by Bruce Brill for the relocation of Kingdale Kennels, south of
T.H. 169/212 and north of Riverview Road. Mr. Brill presented the
grading and plan proposed for the location of two single family homes
for himself and assistant in the kennel operation and the kennel, which
would be on an approximately 100'x 100' pad, set back more than 50 ft.
from Riverview Road. He indicated that the buildings themselves would
sit 50-60' below the grade of 169 and would not be visible from that
location. He explained the work he had done with Pat Kennedy from the
the Soil Conservation Service in having the plan designed to reduce any
erosion possibilities and in fact enhance the erosion problems on the site.
The minutes of previously held Park and Recreation Commission meetings
concerning this item were distributed, which outlined their recommendations
that the site could be developed since the municipality does not have the
funds to purchase this land for parks at this time.
Mr. Sorensen indicated that he could not vote on this matter in that he was
working on the legal transactions for Mr. Brill and Mr. Carnes, the current
owner of the kennels. He asked to speak on behalf of Mr. Brill, indicating
•
the need for rapid action on this application due to legal problems in
transferring titles and exchange of monies with Mr. Grill, the owner. He
asked that action could be accomplished at the earliest date to assist
his client In closing the transfer of land.
The Planner indicated that there were many concerns that must be accounted
for prior to any action by the Village Council, related to the precedent set
for bluff development, traffic access, open space considerations on the
site and trailways, airport conflicts, and method of zoning approving this
project. He indicated that a public hearing would be necessary for the
approval of this project and that had not been handled since the legal
description of the property was received that evening from Mr. Brill.
Putnam said that the earliest time for public hearing would be January 8,
1974, before the Council for rezoning due to the time requirements for
publication and official notices.
Action: Teslow moved, Schee seconded to recommend to the Council the
rezoning from Park to Commercial as per the site plan, and to be on the
Council agenda for the first meeting in January, and that Mr. Brill shall
meet with the Planner to refine the site planning review and architectural
controls on a type of building approval. Motion passed unanimously with
Mr. Sorensen abstaining.
12/10/73 Park & Recreation Commission Minutes
2. Kingdale Kennels/River Bluff Discussion. Jessen stated that he appeared
at a Lower Minnesota River Watershed District meeting on November 28,
1973, to present the Village's situation as it relates to river bluff
protection and the Kingdale Kennel development proposal. The Board
of Managers of the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District at that
time indicated a willingness to participate in land acquisition in this
area. Their policy is to pay 50% of the cost for land lying within their
district boundaries. One uncertainty in this area is the fact that the
district boundary is arbitrary in this stretch of the river bluffs and falls
on the section line, which is only halfway up the hill between Riverview
Road and 169.Becarse this is he district boundary line in this location,
it is possible that the district would not participate in the acquisition
of all of the land to be acquired between Riverview and 169. Jessen
said that there are approximately 42 acres between Riverview Road and
169. All of the land lying east of these 42 acres to Dr. Brant's land is
planned for open space dedication through the BFI P.U.D. and Hustad
Development Corp. planning. Jessen said that the Village Assessor
had estimated the value of this land at about$65,000 total. Jessen
said that in light of what Brill has agreed to pay for the land he wishes
to purchase that this may be a low estimate and that he would estimate
the cost to acquire this property at somewhere in the neighborhood of
$120,000.
Jessen stated that he had talked to a representative of the Minnesota
Water Resources Board about the boundaries of the Lower Minnesota
River Watershed District. The Water Resources Board representative
stated that the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District was the first
such district in the state and at the time of their initial petition, the
land petitioned to be included in the district went to the section line
rather than to the actual watershed boundary. As a result, the district
was established to that section line. He indicated that the Water
Resources Board does not establish districts based on this kind of
information any longer. They now require that a petition to establish
a district include all of the land within the actual watershed. The
Village could institute action to correct this problem in conjunction
with the watershed district. Eden Prairie could petition the watershed
district to in turn petition the Minnesota Water Resources Board for a
boundary change to correct the discrepancy in actual watershed
boundary which presently exists.
Jessen indicated that the acquisition of this land for public open
space purposes would be a wise decision in the long run. However,,
money for this purpose does not exist at this point in the Village's
acquisition planning. The watershed district policy is to fund only
50% of land acquisition costs. Thus, the Village would have to put
up some money for this purpose. The options available to the Village
are as follows:
1. Approve the project as presented by Kingdale Kennels.
2. Reject the project and move to acquire the land, consistent
with the open space planning for the Village.
3. Reject the project and not take any steps to acquire the land.
Brill stated that he felt he has the only good buildable spot in this
section of the bluffs and because of its proximity to 169 and its
related noise, this is not as critical an open space area as some of
the other portions of the bluffs. Blacklock asked about the potential
traffic problem, getting off of 169, onto Riverview Road to get to the
kennel. Brill responded by acknowledging a potential problem but
stated that they felt it was not going to adversely affect their business.
A lengthy discussion followed concerning the merits of spending some-
where between$60-90,000 of Village money for land acquisition in
this area as opposed to spending this money were it available for park
development at this time.
M/Anderson, S/Blacklock that the Park &Recreation Commission
recommend to the Council that the Village petition the Lower Minnesota
River Watershed District to in turn petition the State Water Resources
Board to correct the district boundaries to reflect the watershed
boundaries rather than the arbitrary line which presently exists. Motion
carried unanimously.
M/Anderson, S/Blacklock that in light of BFI's and Hustad Development
Corp.'s planning to dedicate the bluffs to the Village that these small
parcels lying west of the BFI property and between 169 and Riverview
Road be acquired as part of an overall bluff protection program con-
sistent with the Village's Comprehensive Guide Plan and Open Space
System Concept with the understanding that the watershed district
will pay one-half of the cost of land acquisition within their boundaries.
Motion failed 2-3.
M/Erickson, S/Berkland that the Park&Recreation Commission recom-
mend approval of the Kingdale Kennels plan in light of the fact that
the Village presently does not have money available for land acquisition
in this area.
i .
Discussion followed in which Anderson pointed out the adverse
•
precedent for BFI and Hustad if development were allowed in a
portion of the bluffs area.
M/Holasek, S/Berkland to amend the motion to state that this land
and the future development by Kingdale Kennels should be donated to
the Village after a stipulated period of time with Mr. Brill to receive
a real estate tax advantage in lieu of a cash payment. The amend-
ment passed 3-1 with 1 abstention. The vote on the amended motion
• also passed by 3-1, 1 abstaining.
Anderson stated that he felt the Park 6 Recreation Commission was
charged with making recommendations to the Council on the overall
long range plans for the Village and should not have made this
decision which he feels will jeopardize the bluffs area for the possible
cost of only $60,000. Berkland asked if information could be prepared
including statements about cost savings for items such as the future
maintenance and development of Riverview Road and if the possibility
of changing this road for use as a pedestrian, bike, and equestrian
area as opposed to an automobile carrier could be analyzed in a total
cost benefit analysis. lessen indicated that this could be done but
not within the time frame given for action on this project.
r= Lower Minnesota River Watershed District
WARRIOR OFFICE BUILDING
• BUR NSVILLE,MINNESOTA 55378
•
-
Casimer Lubaneky President
Jens Caspersen Vice President
William J.Jaeger,Jr. Treasurer
Merrill M.Madsen, Jr. Secretary 4344 IDS Center
Paul G. Fallquist Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Lawrence E.Samsted Engineer December 27, 1973
Raymond A.Balk Attorney
Village of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Attention: Mr. H. M. Jessen, Jr.,
Director of Parks and Recreation
Re: LMRWD Cooperative Projects
Our File Number 1447-46 •
Dear Mr. Jessen:
The managers of the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District
discussed your letter of December 12, 1973 concerning acquisition
of open space and bluff lands within the Village of Eden Prairie.
They were sorry that the village does not have cooperative funds
available to undertake a project during the calendar year 1974;
however, they did express an interest in the possibility that
the watershed district would commence acquisition of sites that
are in danger of immediate development, with the understanding
that the village would repurchase the properties at a future date.
A similar cooperative project involving the Minnesota
Masonic Home lands was entered into with the City of Bloomington
whereby the watershed district made the acquisition and the City
of Bloomington agreed to repurchase the properties, I believe in
that case, within a period of three years. The repurchase was at
a fixed price that was agreed upon at the time of the cooperative
agreement.
If you are interested in pursuing this aspect of the project,
please advise so that a cooperative agreement can be developed. We
also should be in agreement as to the properties that are in the most
r,,`, Lower Minnesota River Watershed District
,A' 1 Y WARRIOR OFFICE BUILDING
BURNSVILLE,MINN ESOTA 55378
.
L:N y.y..:+... ...
.._ Castmer Lubansky President
Jens Caspersen Via President
William J.Jaeger,Jr. Treasurer
Merrill M.Madsen,Jr. Secretary
Paul G.Fallquist
Lawrence E.Sam ited Engineer
i Raymond A.Haik Attorney
Village of Eden Prairie 2 December 27, 1973
danger of immediate development. If there is interest in this, we
would appreciate receiving some specific recommendations that could
be submitted to the managers for their consideration.
Very truly yours,
I
t
ymo A. Haik
A for for the District
RAH/dnd
cc - Board of Managers
Mr. Lawrence E. Stunted
' PLANNING STAFF REPORT
Date: December 26, 1973
Project: Basswoods site dl - 17.09 acres.
Applicant: M. Z. Jones Associates
Request: Rezoning from Rural in P.U.D. 70-2 to RM-2.5 for 255 multiple units.
Location: North of East/West Parkway and Basswood Drive in The Preserve
bounded on north by School/Park site.
From: Richard A. Putnam, Village Planner
Through: Robert P. Heinrich, Village Manager
Refer to: Minutes- Nov. 21, 1972, Planning Commission
Oct. 18, 1972, Park&Recreation Commission
Nov. 28, 1972, Council Meeting
Brochures: Original Basswoods submission concept plan
approval October, 1972.
Basswoods dl site submission development
approval November, 1973.
Contents:
A. Previous Concept Approvals.
B. Proposed Land Use/Site Plan.
C. Evaluation of dl.
D. Summary and Recommendations.
A. Previous Concept Approvals.
As you remember, the Basswoods concept plan was approved in late 1972, with
rezonings on the single family and townhouse site in early 1973. Further rezonings
for an additional townhouse site and the d2 condominium site was granted in
mid-1973. Construction on the 1st phase townhouses has begun with models
opening in early 1974. The d2 condominium is expected to begin in early 1974.
Work on the Anderson Lake Park acquisition and plan is proceeding --approval
for funding has been secured and details of exact park boundaries are underway.
Agreement between M.Z. Jones, The Preserve, and the Village Park &Recreation
Commission has established an acceptable park boundary and method of treatment.
There has been no submission of "detailed pathway/open space plans" with any
of the development stage applications. This is partly due to uncertainty of the
park treatment and the type facilities to be installed and by whom-- M.Z. Jones
or the Preserve.
The P.U.D. approval stipulated that: "the development stages for the total
76 acre site be consistent with the original approved P.U.D. densities, approxi-
mately 6 units/acre over the 76 acre site.
. ' •:'; . :, s...4- ' ',. ' '\\''----- - ' --".\-
:4:fr..rtt..,:-.t
!.\.‘;,:::::,C-
- ..R t—
4...‘\.7..l—‘ ——s.----
--E 4i00v.012.4e44.j1ir•v.e-.)f:4`4,",:.tii$1-4l 1.r;f.:ce"7k.-;.t,,-gi:;-.t;:xt'3`.1:.4P74 414k;,...:''4,'.•.1:*.:7 4 f,'t
*i t....1r?134..;,...1.i,.t#1,.rfc,.7g..1f;,_.,A.4 N.'t 4 Ms•?
•1 i, _v�.-.. <\'{ice rr 0.,, .-- -, k*::
\\•..o., , `-'s..... . _ ._ -._. .'.. ... . 't %. -•`` .�I C1=i5 .�,!••f • Y y 11+
1 �. 1 1 a�'+"-A ~
•
® ..\ •` mitts}:.,. c'*� +::
i �$1""a�`' •t Ste'.:•
a .off;. :a) s :.c-
.ice I �'(��4;F L i. i. i�j'r' „ ''
II
�'L �. M i
, I .,
.. ,
41)
• � ��
• f.. I
. \-- ..... ,
I
•
1 I •co _ '•• .p `' 1.
3 0
(i:
N I _
t. / rmg r" r" Is /7 1 8: ;‘ - . I
j
si e e. ,.1
yr
a . I ❑
1 ` I 1
1 i ...,/' 1
• . t
/'/ ' ,
0
\ '4,, -
.s
� I, a
or"' t
O i I /I ./
�
. - _-( I o.. bolt'A T
`
qi "; :.
hhV*
Staff Planning Report - Basswoods site dl
Page 2
The following table indicates the proposed, today approved and proposed
units in the Basswoods development.
Original P.U.D. Total Approved Proposed
Net Net Net
Acres du/ac Units Acres du/ac Units Acres du/ac Units
a-1 16 6.1 97 16.02 75
a-2 5.3 6.2 33 5.34 24
b- 5.7 6.2 35 5.66 28
c- 17.95 2 36 17.95 36
d-1 12.62 14.3 180 17.09 14.75 252
d-2 4.69 15 70 4.72 62
e 8.9 16 145 5.37 church
71.2 7.8 596 66.8 7.14 1477
Some things have changed since the original concept approval. First, the total
acres have decreased from 76 to about 66 due to rethinking of the roads and
church/Preserve Center site. Therefore, the best way to gain an idea of total
impact, the overall density figure, and most importantly, the housing type and
quality of site planning/construction.
It is rare that we have an opportunity to inspect units by a developer in the
first phase, before later phases are built. M.Z. Jones Associates, Richard
Schwarz Associates, and J. Robin, Landscape Architect, deserve credit for
quality construction and a sensitive treatment of the delicate wooded sites.
In cooperation with The Preserve, a very proud residential neighborhood is
taking shape that would be a credit to any community. The dl site is critical
to the full complement of housing types proposed and to the image and success
of other sites planned or under construction.
I believe the quality and good design have been part of all the Basswood pro-
jects. Also, the density has been reduced from the original submission by
M.Z. Jones to more closely follow site requirements. Tables 2 and 3 on the
following page summarize the acres, units, uses,du/ac. for the entire
Basswoods development.
•
Existing Site Characteristics
The 76.5 acre site is bounded by Anderson Lakes on the east, the
East-West Parkway to the south, the North-South Parkway on the
west, and elementary school and park land on the north.
There are two distinct vegetation areas within the site.
1. The very dense, mature maple-basswood forest located
on the southern and eastern areas between Anderson Lake.
and the East-West Parkway covers 357. of the site. For
tha most part this has not been disturbed by man. Within
•
this forest is a wide range of plant species which occur
in a variety of situations: tall overstory deciduous trees,
dense deciduous understory and hervaceous plants at the
forest floor. There are also three wet open areas char-
acterized by water-tolerant marsh grasses occurring in
topographic depressions.
2. The open pasture and agricultural fields on the re-
mainder of the site were cleared from the original forest.
There are a number of large mature oaks and elms et the
northern edge of the open fields.
The rolling topography of the entire site is typical of the lands
near Anderson Lakes. The range of slope gradients is from less
than 1% through 50%. I
Planning Goals
In providing a wide range of housing modes within workable vehicle,
pedestrian, utility and open space systems, a prime objective
is to minimize the amount of change to the natural site systems.
The Preserve's handbooks "Framework for Physical Development"
and "Home Construction Guidelines" elaborates on this point and 1others.
Planning Concepts
The underlying concept which has led to the proposed land use
plan is that each of the housing types correspond to a site area
which has real physical limits or special qualities which make
that area unique. •
•
r
Net
Site Site Area Type of Housing Density Numbers of Units
(units/acre)
Attached
• a-1 16.02 Single.Family 6.06 91
Attached
a-2 5.34 Single Family 6.18 33
Attached
b 5.66 Single Family 6.18 . 35
Detached •
c '17.95 Single Family 2 36
d-1 12.62 Muliple 14.26 180
•
Muliple
d-2 4.69 Condominium 14.9 70
a 8.93 Multiple 16.2 145•
Gross Area=Basswoods Parcel 76.5 acres
Street Right of Way 6.5 acres
Total Net Site Area 71.21 acres
Average Density 7.79 units(acre 4. $04. •
•
Total Dwelling Units 596 units � "�
10•
Staff Planning Report -Basswoods site dl •
Page
Table 2 Table 3
lviZT site Acres Use Density Comparisons
c 5.37 Church Units Acres duiac
a 477 66.8 7.14
c 17.95 s.f.
b 477 + 72.2 6.60
a-1 16.02 th church
c , 477 + 78 6.11
a-2 5.34 th church +
5.8 roads
b 5.66 th
•
d-2 4.72 mul
(cond)
d-1 17.09 mul
66.78 exclude e,
onlyresi-
dential
72.15 plus 5.37
church
7e.0 +church +
roads 5.8
acres (if
not included
in each •
parcel.
The densities are dependent upon the way you add up the numbers and what you
count. Some things are clear, however; that the housing types seem to reflect
a reasonable density range and by reducing units in the multiple buildings will
not dramatically affect the quality of life in the area.
The following description is from the original Basswoods proposal stating the
building types and density ranges:
Site Di •
This site occurs on the north facing slopes and is bounded by
the collector road on the south and east and the park site to
the north.
She vegetation is primarily grass pasture with isolated mature
specimen trees at the noth edge of the site.
The primary exposure of the land is toward the park area to •
the north.
Vehicle access is from the collector roads.
Staff Planning Report - Basswoods site di
Page it
Garden type apartment clusters, six to twelve units to a semi—
private entrance and stairway system will be built on this parcel
by the Mark Z. Jones Associates. Buildings will be designed
to emphasize small scale and all units will
have
eht ooexh and
exposuresprimary orientation to the school/park site to
secondary orientation to the pedestrian court system between
the structures and to the south. Garaging will be accomodated to separate structures.
Site E
This site is the most westerly in the Basswoods parcel. It is
completely surrounded by roads however vehicle access will be
from the collector road within the site.
With the exception of those trees on the site of the Nesbitt
home, the site is pasture and cropland.
The site is generally sloping down toward the southwest.
Because of its close relationship to the Preserve Center, the
parkways and the school/park area, Site E will be offered a
multiple housing area at 16 units per acre, the highest density
within the Basswoods.
I stipulated in the original P.U.D. on the housing types on the dl site and
e site that they were the exact opposite of what is proposed in terms of their
placement. The smaller scale 6-12 unit buildings with semi-private courts
would be located adjacent to the single family and condominium site currently
proposed for the large building. The higher density multiple structure would
be located on the e site and southwestern part of the dl site because of its
relationship to The Preserve Center and East/West Parkway. Therefore, the
current submission for the dl is a change or rethinking of the original Basswoods
concept plan, not in density or major land use but in building type and impact
upon the surrounding sites. Commitments have been made to the single family
sites, condominium, and townhouse projects that do set some constraints for
the dl site.
Staff Planning Report - Basswoods site dl •
Page
B. Proposed Land Use/Site Plan.
The land use proposed for the Basswoods dl site is consistent with the P.U.D.
excepting the placement of the buildings on the site. The buildings proposed
take two types. One is a small cluster through-building unit structure arranged
in clusters of 6-20 units, These units will be three stories in height, accessible
with stair tower, and Individual landings for each level. The other units pro-
posed occur in two buildings, totaling approximately 800' in length of the double
loaded corridor nature. Double loaded corridor buildings are arranged in ageneral
lineal fashion, cut into the side of the hill overlooking the school/park, facing
approximately northwest,
Extensive site alteration will be necessary for both building types in the proposed
plan in that a large pad of approximately 250' deep must be carved out of the
hillside to allow parking and building location. This will require cuts of from
4-10' for the double loaded corridor buildings. The other site alteration occurs
near the intersection of the East/West Parkway and Basswoods Drive where the
large hill will be cut approximately 26' to construct pads for the smaller multiple
units. A rather substantial flat area of approximately 250' across will be created
through the center of the clustered buildings to permit access road and parking
courts with the units fronting out from the borders of the site. Grading on the
entire site will not have nearly the impact as on other sites in Basswoods because
of the lack of vegetation, However, a major goal in the original P.U.D.: "to
minimize the amount of change to the natural site systems" and "... housing
types corresponding to a site area which has real physical limits or special
qualities which makes that area unique." Our objectives must be evaluated as
they affect the proposed plan. The original intent of the P.U.D. to locate the
smaller scale buildings (where the large ones are today) so as to complement
the single family, townhouse, and smaller condominium buildings has been
rejected in favor of the proposal presented. Rather than stepping the buildings
up the hill as proposed in the Windslope project in The Preserve, the alternate
site planning technique of notching larger buildings lineally into the hill was
chosen as the site development technique. This is certainly economical and in
many cases, an acceptable method of development, such as used in the
• McAllister Properties' Anderson Lakes P.U.D. However, the impact upon the
single family homes, the school/park, and the development north of the park
should be considered.
The location of these buildings in a lineal fashion maximizes the length of
the corridors and the continuous building facade is viewed from the north and
south. The relationship with the adjacent units of single family and the smaller
clustered apartments may not be consistent.
The original P.U.D. intended to locate the larger buildings near The Preserve
Center, due to its proximity to the East/West Parkway and the vistas over
Neill Lake and The Preserve Center. With the revised plan placing the elemen-
tary school and church site directly west of the dl site fronting onto the park and
Staff Planning Report — Basswoods site d 1 •
Page S
Neill Lake and the East/West Parkway, I cannot understand the reasons for
shifting the larger buildings northeast. The area of the smaller clustered units
is more rectangular in shape and will allow for a variety of shapes with the
apartment buildings rather than al 800' lineal facade. By shaping the structures,
such as has been done by MZJ in Pennbrook in a C or pretzel or like the condo-
miniums on the d2 site in L's and T's, the impact of the total facade would be
reduced and the length of the corridors within each building. Also, the ability
to create some semi-private court or outdoor spaces within the larger structures
is easier to achieve in the southern half of the site because of its more rec-
tangular shape.
it has not been demonstrated that the smaller scale buildings would not work
on the hill site since the layout indicates building pad areas totally separate
from the parking lot areas. This is very similar to the proposal for the large
buildings as presented. However, the scale and physical mass of the smaller
buildings would be much less than the major double loaded corridor structures.
I do not believe that a solid wall of structures adjacent to the community parks
or separating community parks from major residential developments such as the
Basswoods is the best way to handle this site development. Also, the building
scale of the large double loaded corridor buildings is much more consistent and
forms a better transition between the church and school/Preserve Center area
and the smaller scale single family townhouse areas in the Basswoods. It is
probably a toss-up whether the location of the family units closer to The Preserve
Center or to the single family areas is more advisable. In reality, both sites
for the large buildings and the small buildings are within easy walking distance
of all of the facilities. More important than the actual walking distance is the
feeling or visual impact of the area as it relates to the school/park, single
family, condominium, and other multiple projects.
C. Evaluation of dl.
The units proposed within the dl site in the large buildings offer a variety and
excellence in design and construction not present in the community today. The
two story apartment units and the other six or seven varieties of floor plans
offer excellent living environments in the luxury or semi-luxury class. Some
details which indicate the quality of these units would be the large balconies,
separation of the dining and living room areas within most of the unit plans,
and the provision of secluded and well laid out bedroom and bathroom areas.
The construction techniques proposed by MZJ, being utilized in Stratmore and
Pennbrook and other projects as well as Shadow Green, demonstrate high
quality of acoustical insulation and interior finishing. There is little doubt
that the units themselves will be high quality and well designed.
The next concern would be the building layout and the exposure which those
units enjoy. The Intent of the proposed plan is to front as many units as possible
onto the open areas of the park. The lineal plan accomplishes this well, with
Staff Planning Report - Basswoods site di
Page
about two-thirds of the units fronting onto open spaces of some form rather
than a parking lot area. This is an admirable goal and well conceived.
However, as demonstrated in the Meadow Woods project which was not
approved, alternate building locations with a site more rectangular in nature
can produce units which front onto an interior court which is equally as
desirable as the bigger views to the outside, and minimize the frontage of
units directly onto parking court areas. The underground parking proposed is
in excess of the Village requirement of one per unit, and does provide more
than two spaces per unit total.
Due to the lineal design of the structures, some of the units are more than
200' from the elevator cores. Stairways are provided to these units in close
proximity, but the major entrance from the lobby is quite some distance through
corridors which are offset to reduce their impact. The provision of a party
room, swimming pool, etc. is unclear within these units and I'm assuming the
recreation building will be part of this project as well as the smaller scale
units. This would not include an indoor pool but rather an outdoor pool, game
rooms, etc.
Clustered units are similar to those proposed within the Shadow Green project
in Edenvale. These units are accessible by stair tower with units many times
sharing no common walls with those adjacent but rather taking common access
from the stair tower. The clustered plan from the brochure illustrates the
concept very well. It should be pointed out that many of the advantages of
this plan, separating the automobile from the living area, also creates
hardships in that in clusters 1, 3, and 4 some of the garage spaces are over
300'from the farthest unit. One would expect that those units would use
closer garage spaces, but for guest parking, etc. this distance may be exces-
sive. Likewise, from the dropoff spot for the cluster, many of the units are
60-100' from the curb. To many, this is an advantage, particularly with
children but to others it may create a hardship. This is a market decision
which must be made by the developer as to the mix of units isolated from
the parking areas vs. those in close proximity. I believe a reasonable mix
has been achieved with the plan proposed.
Some of the problems experienced in the Shadow Green units occur within the
small building clusters;particularly referring to Table 4, approximately 24%
of the units front with their living areas onto other units less than 75' away.
This problem was alleviated in Shadow Green by redesign of the building
clusters and shifting of unit orientation.
t.-.1 Li;s4 L.1'i taa tith krii fa ifLi Lli aia iliQ' 113 RI ni a,
••:--?.., 6
•
e.......:2, ;
__._-••:•,-.*
• 1 .r. ._
,. ._... .
• % 4 ....
----,,,.... .7...'•1:,i,- , - _ ,
..-f3d:. , --,i• : 4\ .,.,
A7hkr,... •
,-,‘.. •,, A. "(ri ' 4.:::.,16 .m. ••••,... • ..,,i\Nr./Y):4
L. . -••_. s 4''''' -zrfe'L......:
3 ,•,••• • ' - 0 P — - • - .
" i` ..,!;•• -1;3cs,cr ': '1‘ ..''')" ' ' • • ,
-\ ./ .4. '''!"- .s',. - / ,, , ".'4, ' ...,••
e /• -•- ' AY)?
- - ---, i 77_ . ,
1.. ..r--
,•,-"---' -,
-- •' .>, -/-,/ -,1A.
.- •r,,.
.4-•
, -
0811 .. ...;;:•:rr's-.2,-;'''' ,..---, -,---. ,;, -.:,;•-: •• '. • ...,, ,.-/... -1'.0 . 10.-4..k .,..----,„_•:-.,...-- - •,.., 4.ee, . -.1.-
. n,,:-/--...--,---•;•,,-- . •-;••:,- .- fe/ ',i i),, FM- •-----m ••
• •.4....- ' . i/MU ', .9,•,...1"`• .- .
0 I, „„..•-• .i.
'•,.`(!i.54
T• T.
. . - - •...N."Ill till
... ., -.• fii;ki
,..,4 •••..7.:.,.....;,. ..•
........v.iv,:.: ,,,,,,141 • --- - . ,
• =1•. --...••";,•,i.a.-,.. -v ...,......,.:. _ 7,,,t.•••••....;
q •
• • • ...- _ . 1.,•tt,.:....". •11't, .--. • At ?tr. "s'e:
• . 4;1"-::`,` r- .-al.,?•:•!:;‘, , ,4,*; --7.t
•
marl •
• . ' • , . Aifi ......Vir"""7-.1-4"e
.4 . • . . . • • • .
•-... ,,,vik.-..,,..- -, . . .
I I•' ' '5•!.._, daramei
--7 -:-. '.yr..,-,_701 „.••••:
tu 0 • ,..„. :I( - : ‘ ' I. ,... 4.1,wi .Pla,
. 4.-....--.......: ' • woo .-,. ' ,:.- •
-74-.. . a ..;...'...• '''' '
111.11% 're-. •••••_At•••,••:
-• • .‹-
'
- - - .
n...Thys,..._
•• - • r ''- / ....e.- NI,' /•••
-_.,...---.... - .4•-•:::-.4,44i..-.....,•,_ 9-
r -.0, .--- -i--,L. , ...,.....L._ -,: . IIIII,..r..-= . ,...
--,_-:----w
. -t-:-.-:•i•. ...!.„,• . ..40),;:so...:s -M
, , • •— ::::-:,-- W.,,,..,4 — CO - •
1 ,f•.:': ' .".-•:',
..,,,iitt'im I aim, . • - -.„,.......
CR) • -71W".•,..-r i.,::...-/ -r.
:▪__.•
. . •• .
- .
.. . • . 0 -.
•---7.:"..:,
emus • • . ,
.. .
0 CO
P.a.
,ranli • ' . - t----' ' ••Z.,_....._ _..-.2-:
.1.., • ' . .
. .. A_ x. • .,._,-,F.--7-2. :-_▪-,- i
• :,,N.::.• . 4.,,,,,,-__--
.9 .. . N -.,- - -.--•---L:-: !
4 a • "E ...
' .
711 .
... - - •-- ,
. • ' '•`,...- -,.....,....- ---.7.---. ---IL". .Ir:.- •.t.‘ 1". '''''''.\‘'..1 1 - - ‘ ...,. ..• ',. ' --,..".'•:-;...----4..---..77--.:-L-:---- !iMUnilliMNIMUMM::'"Al mme"--1z" • • . . _ ___-___.-
*•., :::,,t,,',;',.^!'!Y•' i 1'I''. X4°. -----------1- ---1' •- .,:.\....NN' : - .-." --,:;-1.-•
.• - -.f.-...4., mem •.••I',1 P'„,,,,1_ - • ....., ..-- - ',""--. \.,-..„.,Ns .,:-..:\ ':•••,••` 's „-.1---- --:---- .,
........ 0 ,.c...,% VAIIIIIIIiipnunsiffE. _-=-7;"•-',-;•,<'- s Ileo••- N s,- ••,. .
F-- -LZ-'5'-7-7--•--;"....... _ -•••;..t. 41e- tf-W..." •••*;;-_ ,•••-'N,_ '\•-•"*.•:'7, '\,';..,\ .-7._---..L.-_.r=11-----
• C.1 r.•,..-.:1-_'•-••• ., -,-'I; -.----•-•_:1=.....-"„1-.... .%-_-;>.„ _ 77.S.,••,;\. \•.'''V -,, ----.:•. --1----:.-:-: .
.. ......
6/_0, :L:t- •-r.' 1 ' .,ittalik --- --. . - — ' '''' '''' '':.'.:‘:.2 -- -- --'....---
•.•:,,,, m .. . .,..1. -4 _ --,.! ,-.• -..,-,'N .,.. • ••. ' ..,, •.• -.7_.:-.•-:7,--.1..7.--.',..,.. , •••••-,,,..a. i.i*_Aims, •,,, . -..=.._•... --e-_ -41 •N's.;:...,....:.:. ., -:•....„ '',..--::::•••-• ...":--____-•-...t.,:z.,..:-,
....--: `" .,....-S._,•,...4,,,- . .......,.-7—t.:::_.p....e.r,,, , ,t,--,.. • , N....N.; ...•.f, • ........ _____-_
..::.= rO 144:-„•-, -4/ice - .,•• ",:'Ai‘'''
basstreccart dl veset
I
Staff Planning Report - Basswoods site dl
Page
Table 4
Units Which Front onto Others at/within 75'
#Units of total Units
Cluster#1 9 30
#2 9 21
#3 0 21
#4 g 24
#5 9 15
24% = 35 111
The location of the smaller multiple units adjacent to the East/West Parkway
could create some problem in that the minimum setback on clusters#9 and 3
is 50'. in some cases, this is the end of the building with no major orientation.
However, in many of the units, the private yard space for these ground floor
units occurs very close to this four lane arterial. Since these units will
likely have children, this could create some conflicts which may be avoided
by selection of alternate building types or unit redesign.
As with the Shadow Green project, the connection of walkways within the pro-
ject is not well defined. It is implied that to move between buildings, one
must take a circuitous route around the perimeter of the site or walk in the
parking areas and road areas in undefined pathway arrangements. The detailing
of the pathway system within this site is critical to creating a sense of
neighboring and neighborhood within this rental project.
Another concern from the esthetic angle will be the treatment of the garages
and their impact as viewed from off-site and the auto court areas. The term
gang garage can be used to describe many of these areas. The site plan
indicates pitched roofs on the garages, consistent with the buildings, and
the attempt to offset and turn the garages where possible. It is critical that
the details of each cluster be carefully considered when evaluating the land-
scaping plan for the auto court areas to reduce the impact of the parking
garage courts.
I believe the clustered multiple units provide one of the highest quality resi-
dential environments for multiple family occupancy within the Twin Cities and
in The Preserve. The units themselves are very flexible and can adapt to
sloping terrain as demonstrated in the Shadow Green project, as well as
separating the living/pedestrian environment from the auto courts. The plan
Staff Planning Report - Basswoods site dl
. ' Page 7
as proposed with the suggested modifications would be a successful resi-
dential environment in the Basswoods.
D. Summary and Recommendations.
I believe that the original P.U.D. proposal approved by the Village is still
valid, that the dl site should be used for the smaller scale buildings particu-
larly where they interact with the single family, condominium, and townhouse
sites and that the combination of the eastern half of the dl site and e site
be utilized for large double loaded corridor buildings as proposed in the
Basswoods dl and be constructed in a fashion that minimizes their exterior
impact by siting the buildings in L's, T's, C's, pretzels, etc. rather than
straight lines. The reasons given in the original presentation by the developer
for siting the larger buildings near the Preserve Center and the Parkway and
the school/park area I believe are more valid where the redesign of the Preserve
Center is proposed. The relationship to the church and the activities within
the Preserve Center as well the views over Neill Lake offer the high activity
amenities and proximity to service uses which those residents may desire.
I believe that an excellent site plan can be worked out on the sloping site
• with the smaller buildings using many of these concepts being demonstrated
in the Shadow Green site in Edenvale to produce quality rental/family units,
more in keeping with the scale of the related and
ttedi underlefamily,
ily,construction in the
smaller
lrcondo-
minium, and townhouses currently approved
Basswoods.
I believe the development team is making an honest and fair statement of their
analysis of the market and the site and the difference of opinion over the place-
ment and design of the buildings should be resolved by the Village Commissions
and Council Members,given the arguments on both sides of the coin.There is
little doubt that the plan proposed would work and would be very marketable;
however,-it is my opinion that there may be a better and more sensitive approach
taking into consideration the external site features. I believe that the
double loaded corridor structures totaling BOO in length present a rather massive
building wall along the park as well as either obstructing the views of the condo-
minium and single family units or at best presenting the third floor and roof
exposures to those units is not necessarily the best development technique on
this site. Earth berming, screening, etc. become necessary to shield the structure
from its surrounding environment only when that structure is inappropriate to its
surrounding area.
Recornrlendations:
1. Recommend the endorsement of the building types as clustered, multiple
units and the large double loaded corridor, security elevator buildings for
construction on the dl site in the Basswoods.
2. Recommend that the development team adhere to the original P.U.D.
approvals which locate the larger double loaded corridor buildings in
Staff Planning Report - Basswoods site dl
Page
the southwestern area of the site closer to the Preserve Center and
the East/West Parkway, and that the smaller clustered buildings be
utilized to develop the hillside sloping toward the school/park.
3. Recommend that the building design for the double loaded corridor
buildings explore the use of multiple angle structures, such as T's,
C's, pretzels, etc. rather than the more massive lineal facades.
4. Recommend the redesign with detailed care of the pedestrian movement
within the project itself between buildings be given greater care than
represented at the time of the next submission.
S. Development of the clustered multiple buildings be sited in such a
fashion as to step up or down hills, thereby providing a smaller scale
group of structures, more consistent with the residential area sur-
rounding the site and as viewed from the park.
DP
12/18/73 Planning Commission Meeting
III. D. Basswoods dl site for a artments located In The Preserve. Request .
rezoning to RM-2.5 for 255 units on 17 acres.
Mr. Godin from M.Z. Jones Associates and Dick Schwarz, architect on
the project, presented the details of the site plan and answered some
questions raised on the tour on December 1, 1973, of the site.
There were questions related to when the recreation building would be
constructed along with the amenities such as the pools, etc. Godin
indicated that these would be constructed with the first units and that
all recreational facilities would be finished by the end of the first phase
construction since they are required for a mortgage commitment.
Also, the rental range was discussed. Godin indicated that$190 -
possibly over$400 would be the range for these units, certainly in the
luxury or semi-luxury class.
Mr. Carter from The Preserve asked that action be taken and public hearings
be scheduled at the earliest opportunity to allow the construction of these
rental units in The Preserve by early next year. He indicated the need for
rental units in The Preserve, of which there are none at this time, for their
economic and housing mix.
The Planner indicated that a Staff Report was not completed on the Basswoods
site due to his time out of town and the inability to schedule a tour of the
site prior to December 1. He indicated that other projects had been before
the Village prior to that, such as Edenvale South, BFI, Gelco, etc. and
Basswoodsthat the site
must be taken in its turn. He indicated
would attempt to complete a Staff Report by the January 3rd meeting he
•
The Commission asked that the dl site be referred to the Staff for a report
by their next meeting, January 3, 1974.
11/20/73 Planning Commission Meeting
Ik •
D. fass-, 'cs..s S5.t2 dl
Deleted fr im rgsnda.
11/6/73 Planning Commission Meeting
•
C. Basswoo t_ located along Basswoods Blvd. in The Preserve.
Hr. Dick Schwartz presented the preliminary plans for this project.
The site is essentially divided into two different areas. On the
west side of the site the buildings are divided into five small
clusters of units. On the east side there are two large corridor
apartment buildings.
There was discussion over the relationship of the large multiple
apartment building to the single family home to the east.
Hrs. Hegexa motioned that this be
to the staff for
a report and continued at the next eting.
The motion was passed unanimously.
*a.
III 1 I 1 1 1 1
� � 1 r
• p100
la.
I
F
a m
m A
0
A a
basswoods dl
i - I I I I 1 I I
N i
.--Ili 111,,,,t11.,
\ ‘
L._ ' _:,... ) 4 ,
8 y
8 C, ,...:� Jii - g. ` I
i '' \ 14 • '
‘1-.,, ..../4-.''''s- ' ' ,.... ,..f' iiii
EH 4 \\ „ -..
t
N basswoods dl 1
W I 1 .
•
_-�'nogA wu,th wlbc�a \" - (_'
II
3 I Y
• I �� a III
•
• g
O
I ; I t
I a
../, , .,, I /...
i.acr `, I
IN
-" ir.X...t. 14,1*,:, .s; ',..,,,1 ..- 4 a\
Si
Z / ��u r b v a ' 4 4•;.. . �r
/ °h i dF ,;� ;. ems 1!� r '
,,„,,,,„--.:4,,i4i;:-,..* . ,x-f- .v.:4t,N.,,„4,,,,..;-.-,-..,...,,,-,...,J,.!9
•
f -i. p tit (-3/ •` ,..1
it •
r .461. , i 4 . , , ,,
, r 7
zv;� y s cr4' rf •��c ; Via^ f a
i.+ ,"G� `yaw•°}" ?1t •, �"� w . ;i
" fi^' r � B fit xaft , i.,: „ 1' ✓ ' , .:,` i
r a
y:
Z 1
w basswoods dl
�y�
-- /
�' ;
,� 'ram ,• -`,,,,,..., ;,,,,, .,.., .. .. - .,.. . ;,, ,, ,.,........
,\,I' -";
�t A ` z`
11)10
�� •° � -
1 igic4jrtiot
•
t);n1= IX 84:.:ok„ •.. '. -. ,4 : A,,,,::_
. alalaii\i....' .=-"'"*.;:74:., k. , A ,..t 'III .„,.... * :.. r
/ stItts
is t•''''' 1------"- . 8k..1,-4.\:'-4 ',. 'ff. .:-':-' : ,/ ,,P
N.F6 \ /it --,;,,,, ‘. 10.:-:' s\ wy
_, / in
�
4i _,a ��
•
Li
.:. „,-> ,, y 1,_ $4 -
5---- 10,k 4, . 4 -.. . .,
,Y
1%11.,ti,c,1,,,7,izi',..,.-20.5,_:.,..,. .,
M
\
/ t," ?c, ,‘ •r
„ _,„
,s N .,
„,
s,„
,,,,,„,.,,, „,
., „, ,
\\„,
\ w.
,„ , 4,N .48 4.
• ,„,
„ ____
110, 2*
r ilfriliVippilL ,\
'!' . \ % ..fori ,
- - -W -,... '-iI0,>" I.' t
1 N._,/,#./.iiiiihAWfrA ,.,,,,,,,, s
7,y,, s#00 1
4„,,, w ' , A • t
ir --tvp.a: . v).\‹ i..cli
.. loom.
t l,As w, \ ate` \...
17,40".. __klos,11. I'
, .-..'-'-'''7,
.ttiv, I
` r-'' *4F ;01\41\i.5:: k
irii-----s--- .Ab\4-10 .-Ap-;N--, - ko,
4. 0 --- \A , ,4*-TO 011. -:T/ik
eihtib AA, .4: 4,-/--,---'-..----..-.,--,, _ ,,\
Nter7 \ '.‘:A' ,P 7,/&, \\ -"Ib ‘
�11-8,1:17-1 r ', \;if '� �����
t( \ ;,
GI)---'-- * - 1# \ - iii'\
\.,‘, i \--Zi,-.7i)A;\
U 0. \‘\ \ & W-ANAk't
/, - AO -'\ '''N'Clj)
, . -t)\10b041
\ \\, 1 AlIP rig* . AL
; \ i i!i', loolp -.\ \ • ‘,‘„,.___,44,
)I (
L'\‘'Itgs --a.::- \,,_2\-\\:\‘\\\\\(\::h4)1*1 1
/ 0...: _, ‘ ‘
cyl ba dsi • r�j�� \ 1
11 w \�‘
1 I
Zr I I
.., t.7, :,(--
• IN,
, z fr), .416
.; r-..40II/
ye
,
...., , i
. • .... k
4
.4 1 1- ' e-S,' r1 ',...r,71.\•• 1\.•‘;r• ii‘I.1 "•-'. Jle
,...ki,.....-11.... ,4 ,-.... „ ...,,i,...... ..on . .. • .' -,',,'7 ' ."''.- '`..• "V'
, --, . .0:....„,,,,, „.-.
,-
-,.:,_- - 44Yki-
,,A-7-, , ,,, ..:- ., , 7.,-
0„...;• . -7-- - .• ,....3 .- ....---- --;,•'-'::".
., .,
-.:::; -40 -l'••,--kl )4
J I.
' '.-' .4
' -- . -•-•' ' ' VA,.- tbv..-1 - -;,,,,.;, _,:-:-----
.•
0---
or!.-:',:' -- 7' . , /mow .., VI'7,:ft.il,.-- '• 0,1',,," 0
I ,,__,4,,.... , lila --;-7.i!i•-•-- ..„.., ,
• ,% .....,... -
..,
,- ,...-.fr cm/mar
'''''•':•!,-4;
I' 'I! _ .,,,•1"'11. _r•
'''' .,.1.•'' :.. -7
"MI • 4. -ii'..,-:.1.,•-•
. . .
P e •,-
4..-• '''' ' .-•''''',1‘ •• .7*-'',111' ' , ,•-
MIC I l' , .''''',,I.._ '.:7-••.'0 4 e.,
-..1
IV
' ire
- -• •.' • -. .... e• \,
1
7:,',s- -•,
...,,-,.....
it. -,, i T, •‘--'';';'s'' - , • . •
,-•\ .
k---,..,.• '. It ,, , Dal ' ' '''''''-'•
• ;„4",..1„,. ,._. v 00 _
--, ..-:'••••
-r I • ,. , ._.,•a
4 , N't.',•
. o 1- ••••• f_
-5.5- • .4-_, ,- --t,-
- F.-
. . a --. .. ..:,.
-_...-
,..... illiiljiumomilWPF/1. . Iiiii ---mil .• ' .\'‘ :-. s'' 's-'', :' — -E1
!t,..---, • ,tillmoilimaiivi-- ....,,.1. ""7•51:'- '\'' '- - - ''''' ' ' -:- - '
.13 F--". . e --,
, `N,111111oPstrpiViotstla._ r.-,-;-- — -
1'C: : ;Et ---— ‘?; .<
---
— , \ • __-- - 7
Xii ' - to • ,, ,A.,,,,--,z. _=_ -_-,..:.-.•,..-. _.., „,...,..k.,t,.... f. • .,
,,,..... ,...- 0,•,...,..... • ,.., , ...•.•„,--- -....„ .... ..:,. !: ..:. --......._•.--- ..
Zro ,,_ , .• -,- .,- —--- 7.--N--
CD basswoods dl west
I 1 1 I I r 1
3 > = - � }
,� i r_� ► *---,
a - 5 s-�,
: R m I H
O ' J
M
-a r -OD -r
at
"
R 9
gri VV
E -00r--, _
-_y v'
ti
P 0
Z
basswoods dl west .,
■ I I I I ( t 1
$ 1
ji
10
i 1 - --- . : i ' 1
_ ,J '� _.
_. -. -- II
VV7/ C0 l
0
N VI 1-,_11T1-
4 �� - - r3
s Ica
' --, r---1 i
lij
r' [
r 4 ...__.. 1 .;1. "Lin
Z
0) basswoods dl wrest . ,
I —.- I I I 1 I [ i
t
.1,
i
sr m 0
_ , .4_.•... ..._..
g 1 Qom' 7,-JIM___
C1
�..1
m 1 ,:r----..,_..,
I
It
co
. ..,-. .:.- : 1 c_....2, L _.,
z
CO basswoods
dl west 1
1
• 1
II
.
r I I I i I I I II I
•
PARK PARK PARK
2 \* n i I ;
OP �.
iT ] c.
�
• F
&
n 01
_.. _ ►\"1l,,,,
G
, Iti 1.
11,,,,,, (..
litt
ogi i
COU lIM Ifi l
r.
Cl)
75
• ROAD
m it,
v ROAD
Cl) .
S k
r
.._-7W_ ROAD •
O
i..._
ll
6 . L.:-...' ,)--
,. _ .
o basswoods dl
or o - I i
1 - ; 1"
i. iq • %• .
•I -
•
, .
1.---
....
'
, . .
... ,
, •, • :k ,,,
i •IN I.
1 • 1
1
..,
• '. _,A.("e).
• MN..e.,..
'1 s— ••'
..
. a•k'.
i
1:,!: •
f
I, 1!
•
„ ,--7
L,
. ' .,4
!..
,Jr?'. •'.%
I•
ill
\ ( 1 ,
s. .. .. ,
.
IMMIO \
\
......,
)2111,,,, , \
Li;
rn '-• -- ' ;.. .s, ,..,
,
:-_-,• , ,
.,- .
-.
.. -
Cf) ,
-..- .
. . „
soui basswoods dl
...ii
. .
I I I I I I II - 11—vp .14:4• a I :
AF(..' 4%,) ,,•
-114 . .. tip. -',''' .• '''
.2:•;;:i.
_,_--i-7.- le,•,,,.
„..-1,.,• ..'i.. 4... ..1... . •, 7.r.
4%.tz mS
• A 11111OF
. .. •.1- ....,:... 4?—am EN ,. ./.,..
,.
\I. .. : :-.--,,-..*- :i . ;\ j"..ik - °- :.-• ..•,•::.r.--.
._ •
. 7—x-x•ft.,,-- ---
EN . .,,.. ..-i
C.:......,,,'
I_-,e4.,.. ,r' . '''•: -':r- •,1‘. MMINNE'MMMMIN ...r"----.3.,7'1,'7.•:'''''*., ---
k- -, '''' .•'. ' ,,, '.
, • '-.->, ,,.;,,k c?i,•,., . .
IA a
0
8
8 ' ,,,..c,,I - -.:,.
. • . , ‘:
,irt
tA.`,1' 4`.' '
,-0,- -
..c.1, • rOT
I I N ri'..-....":q."..
'.;1"_)\
-;.1,---1 -,_.....-k"E) !--.i
"---*. '..;.•:.::;:e,k,ir....
ril..'",/...-v40:'
No II;e4 1 . I - .-- : 1*.
. ,.
' I f .., •
;4t 47 ir'I'l 1
i--
,•.
AA...'•
. :I, ...1. AG_ .81
0 .,:t
'I' 14 • litiSCVV.:8 . •1.‘1 „ „ 11 4dit
...
4 =k 0 1:- if•''._
./,./
... 11; 1 1411U;• •
1 ,03 •': . .. ';Mill• mot ri...._,..,.0, ••
-:.:.• • .•
Cr - - • 4!'''.
. ..
r• _-. 0.,,n. 0,
.‘ 1
, ',o - * i Dv .• H
0
... „;‘, ., .• • t" ...,6
Z . :r.1‘...ilM
• = ;:.
,. o a
, o ,,.
0 .: :.4,.',1, ,,.
..„12,,
.._ 0,. .
0 r -6 0 CL A Cr Co i _ •
- 1 • , - ril ''
OCi IC t----'--t5'1
Z = 1 4":
m 011.110N -6 $ g
__ — I -
_., ..._.
-;;;-„,-. ,,,-14 ‘;•-
.0 111 § $ § gg 1 g — .. -- • '-:,-.., ',7.,',4P-
)10 __.i ..?. f,
Z PPPPPPP *-_-:;-+ ici--7.: 4?'
• . _ .
..1
14 basswoods dal . east •
. .
I I I I - IF IF- If - 'i - :- . -4 •
z-'•-••=-..--:,A",-' ••.;) -'..•-r 1.'.. :-
---E.=-".70tii/j.<4 - . • 'sr-O.,E_._.-
. . --. ' -- -• RZ:i4...-kih. "kJ' • ':' -M.'• -\
ft.=.1,;,...g. ....1 '' - '. ...•
4 ••= -,
, t,r‘ 5.••..r.N1 Prl'%,'t'l - — - '
..,..- - ,1,0444 ‘ ,1'.4. —-- •41.SI--,,,,,. \•
: ' - ‘11."'W. • s-
F •
• 0 ,T0,14V. ' .4/0.1 Zr.73.'40 0V 441
1 ---
')1101, P.-I --•
--,,N,1%;- vil -- '4•:=-T...-' /,1 C
' --.!,:r- • ;.---— 4,,- • ...-,..
--*a,7,-,..-ii).- 1...1 - ,,, .... . • .goelili,
r•k l -• "..: , 11,V,
1 i..\ 1/ 4. i lit -- . - 1 I:4. • ' - 4 ' I -.7.7:-..:.2=1-!...•
a I....----,por. .•I!!
- . ,, • E;71-4—gr•=-7
-c •';'.• . ..
,-,•.1,. . , „, ...• --t----, .1 It
---, , , .._-.1,.-._-‘—-- - •
Itt,\
...t_._ .,iirily ma .„--..---...., •-..,.7 ....
a
•t ''.... . . ,111'. , ' • 1
. •'
Cli
',aft- 1.,.Ve. . ' ..,", /,' II
•:..% .,_. . r..s' ‘0;- • ' •-f/A t,
---4*''',
'.%'''-
,..,. , .
'"'•‘
8 • 4 -7 •
•
• Jilt.,„ri"-- '
--...•ga-. • I ,/1
'11° .**. : .i..‘4'4,/5A "1
. .• ,,•&••ft .,-2
- -'.:10.'1 '8/
•tk.Oh .'''' ---
-'' Ikv ,. %0• '
eilf/Cwiasf O.,Ak ,e,„ .,4 ,
4k ' ' ' s IP \\11111111k\‘L---"'‘'"-t".'-'r ''-•a. 10
' .....i,.... ••,^4. . .d.i ?h.-• ":-.:
5.',...). 16.7- 1.7-7,/int _ __hi''•AN...".,,:.\.---4
.7.-:' " - • .....'Mitini Pa NM iiii=MO-- .
. • .
II%
1
,i40 ,f; 4t „,, , '011, • 0, .
41411 i,%Ss. - '-_'44/..•-
a
f,/ b'
it.•-.,_-7- . r
-- .
_ . -- -
. - - -
— - -I-- '.
A ft.- ... . . '• ''4E-:•• Ra- mu 0 -, --.:.,;;._:_••., , • •
• •,,„
,.• ,, . . . .,_.,„.
1 ------ - -----
4 Vila , 4417tii,1 WI
Il U. [ ok
s, ,
•I.:. . .
*iv ....„..-.00. .,.!..;
,,riii'- ' .. glipi • '.. C ill ' i'ri 1 ---4
n e, al!p,, kilr2ji_ i ,• _
_.
, ,•.......,...,,, ..
C , ' „ • .-.r....: ---..".•-."...Z. , CL
gm A:*• -1%.--xIi•N-••*. moi mono ommil
-'f,.% 0 • . i i,
r --- :, 4,,-,-,,\-q, ., •,, 1.,, • ‘,. ,--.--,;- --- - ow
2 ,,i ,_,./Jig • .,, ... ,--.,, ,--.__--
I.:1z, (,it,, ,,i/.•. • ,•,, /,„;., /.., ,.----,. ;-. __ ---- , -..v.. --..c,..,_::
....-0., _ , , , ,..._......-__ _.. _ w
,,,,,.- :::.......,. :.... a =Ill pe....,, _ ....._
...,_...........,..tt ..„,,....: ,
......... , _ -,.--_:.-
0 •--2„..,..,,-;..--„.. 4„,„,,,, , ..
.. ,..-,-Itottfia..._:-..,
,.. ...._ t
1
a hiOnlr::'
.. ,- ..,._.„/ irrz...E..q.
mil
i . . 1 1-'-• - ---.--=--1 07 ,0-,.. .„ , grii
1 . .1.'4, ....
0 Ca hi hi 14 " " g ,-;‘,, .c...:.,. .j..,7- , •• • \'•' ... ,0-` -, - .
.4•\ -,e-
..,,, , _ .......::.._........
.IP,;,
I) ii § ligg k 4.' ... •--., gm ,,,,_-
..;,4-_-.----7,------.:
.....,_ $... ••••• •••••
7.c.44° .0.•
-.ii';‘,....• - --_ - - - - - -----
r 21111112 1 > '1",,,‘• 91k‘.''- ••--- --.-,.... ,. .-.-.. .... .._ .._. .f.s.
PPPPPPP !•-
Z „..0 t ..... ......-, .
• ---- .
100140601 ''fit• 2(iiV '• ',,,—. -••!..--1;. 0.'.";0-0-.-"" i
•''' 0,• ••••••0:0:-0'.>
* / 4
•
' .
aelb
(.4 basswoods dl east
. .
III ( I I 1 1 I !
_
•
rg
CT
$ 1 0 1': - . ----- i :
1
c r 1 j
Z
"'1 NI 1 -
'.0
Z •
t basswoods dl east •
t / ( I I ( I
L '
::,_ i _ i - --
9
CL
i
,t..,:pli j - -,_7- -- __
!Lio
0 0 I , -
Piv'l . ._=_.- _-
m basswoods dl east
■ 1 I f 1 f I
• ..,..L. _;
a
,'
0 i
FI
1
1
� \ T:
Z
S rii
r
Z
4 basswoods dl east
I I I 6 ( t I I
o
,..) r, i
. . ,
.,..
,. ..
..,.. _._ _
la , . 1 . ,
Z .a ail, . . 4_ a
r
'1.1111 1
r
a
z
4 basswoods dl east
II 1 I I I 1 I i
:if' ll '- .i,-- T1--.' ' '
SealC
r
. . .. �.
i f_
I
j s
/ lJ 6
-i 1 - , .t
P o
il
8 basswoods dl east
�� �I ' -
'' �' :'i; •v \
l •
i
, , -TurT,,,.
■w*
,ar *
a
- r \
. ate.
\ • i '' ' ' /
8 • ., s.,,. ,,„ .. , , ,, ,
0,:-, ..,.•. /. . , \.. !
,._ ..,,,,,,! ,
i'f '1' x; T �� ,,.. \1 -, !� ( `
p .,, ,..
e ;
,_ r i
V, j ,;
...4 . ....___. .,....•____ r {`; �N , ,
gni
co basswoods d1
I _ I 1 1 I I I . ( i
Y
4
6 2 • -manaTdm ornco 1 2 }
co 4 co 1
NI410-6—6gi, 'WNNN-+
g 1
i f 1 ?' 1
4 I . ''• 4
.0 116116§gritII
0
f . 1322111325 -- 182.11.8t ,
1
i
j.t 1
S
3 basswoods dl
r I I I I I I
= ; -
! II 11
Ur. ! ngt
arm
eon
igiggg4OM
basswoods dl
STATE OF MINNESOTA •
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
CtSTRICT NO 5
IOSS NO.LILAC DRIVE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINN.
December 27, 1973
r. Paul R. Redpath
gayer of Eden Prairie
8950 i}1en Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Iiinnesota 55343
In Reply Refer To: 315
OR 5 at Mitchell Road
C.3. 2701
Dear Mr. Redpath:
le are sorry about the delay in replying to the letter you sent us in
October concerning this location. :e had difficulty in scheduling the
traffic counts and speed studies. tle have completed these studies now
and have core up with the followinn; results and conclusions:
1. The speed check yielded the following data:
a. 40.a of the vehicles were exceeding the current
speed limit of 50:.iPh.
b. The ,;5th percentile speed was 54:2'i (85th per-
centile speed is normally .self t: establish
speed zones).
c. Only 2;0 of the vehicles are currently traveling
below the proposed 4011311 speed limit.
2. It is felt that lowering the speed limit will accomplish
little if anything and only create a situation where the
drivers will completely ignore the speed limit unless
rase:ova police enforcement :aea:;ures are taken.
3, . traffic count was taken and the volumes obtained were
t :,e.,..,.:ary for o.:aii:.. z
the intersection.
4. .::ci.dcnt statistics from 1972 shoe that there were only
two accidents at this intersection during toe entire year.
There were 330 locations in oar District that had five or
o re accidents in 1972.
fr '
4
4
•
i;r. Paul ;t. :iedpath
Doce:aber 27, 1973
?y;e 2
5. Forty—eight of the above 330 locations have traffic
volumes sufficient t,: justify signals, funds are
—
available to construct only approximately 19 of
• these signals during; 1974 and 1975.
6. If and when funds become available to construct
the traffic signals at this location, the inter..
section will be rebuilt to include left turn and
right turn lanes.
It appears that little can be done at this tine concerning the items out—
lined in your resolution of September 25, 1973. 'de will,however, place
the interaction of T3 5 and }•fitchell Road on our list of intersections to i
signalize and construct the signals when funding allows.
Sincerely,
f7p6:tn
. Robinson
District Traffic IDigineer
RiEI:Ict
(site.)
I
•
•
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
• HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 773
A RESOLUTION ADDRESSED TO STATE OF MINNESOTA
REQUESTING SIGNALIZING THE INTERSECTION OF
MITCHELL ROAD and STATE HIGHWAY#5 IN THE
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, traffic volume on T.H. #5 has increased because of the
• completion of new U.S. #212-#169 from Crosstown`62 to T.H. #5, and
WHEREAS, a safety hazard is created by school buses turning onto T.H. #5,
and
WHEREAS, the traveling public cannot safely turn off of, on to, or cross
T.H. #5 west of I-494 to the westerly Village limits, and
WHEREAS, emergency vehicles located at the Public Safety Center-Fire
• Station on the southeast corner of T.H. #5 and Mitchell Road are not able to safely
enter onto and to cross T.H. #5, and
WHEREAS, major employers located on T.H. #5 are concerned about the
safety of their employees and have petitioned the Village Council for correction action,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Minnesota State Highway Department
be hereby requested to upgrade T.H. #5 through the Village of Eden Prairie by:installing
traffic signals at the intersection of T.H. #5 and Mitchell Road, constructing right lane
by-passes at all left turn intersections, constructing turning lanes at all right turn
intersections and lowerin the existing speed limit from said intersection west to
County Road#4.
ADOPTED by the Village Council on September,25, 1973.
,/ WA
ttZ
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST:
Juh"n D.Frane, Clerk
j ' /
December 21, 1973
Honorable Mayor and Village Council
Village Planning Commission
$ Mr. Bob Heinrich Village Manager
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN. 55343
Ladies and Gentlemen:
To support my application for a liquor license, I would like to submit
for your review and consideration this letter and the accompanying
following drawings as a witness to my intentions should I be the success-
ful applicant for the above li cense.
- Edenvale Land use plan
- Restaurant site plan
- Restaurant floor plan
- Exterior perspective of restaurant.
If successful in my application for a liquor license, it is my intention
to construct a new restaurant in the Edenvale Planned Unit Development
at the southwest corner of Mitchell Road and Martin Drive near the south
entrance to Edenvale.
This site will accomodate the proposed restaurant, and will provide on-
site parking for 150 cars. Through a reciprocal parking agreement with
the Dietrich building to its south, has an evening overflow parking of
37 additional cars. A generous area of the site will be preserved as
green space and landscaping. It Is proposed that access to the site
would be through a shared driveway from Mitchell Road and from two
separate and widely spaced curb cuts from Martin Drive.
The proposed restaurant building will consist of a single story with a
basement, of about 6600 square feet of ground coverage. The restaurant
will have a capacity of 162 diners in the main and terrace dining rooms
and 52 diners in the banquet room for a total of 214 diners. The cocktail
lounge will have a seating capacity of 72 persons. The food preparation
kitchen and waitress station is so located to serve all public areas of the
restaurant with equal facility, inciuding the cocktail lounge.
Public entrance to the restaurant will be by means of a covered carriage
entrance addressing itself to this parking along Mitchell Road and by a
side entrance to serve the parking along Martin Drive.
The service entrance address itself to the north wall of the Dietrich
/(
•
p
Honorable Mayor and Village Council
Page 2
December 21, 1973iI
building and will be screened from view from Mitchell Road and Martin
Drive by landscape plantings and by masonry screen walls. All trash and
garbage will be stored within the building for daily trash and garbage
pickup.
Ali public service functions such as rest rooms and a coat room will be
on the main floor. Staff service facilities such as employee's rest
rooms and lockers will be located in the basement as will certain food
and beverage storage facilities.
The remainder of the basement will be unfinished and will be so laid out
so to permit its finishing into additional banquet space should this need
develop in the future. This expansion space will be limited to the
excess parking porvided and will meet ordinance requirements.
The restaurant will be constructed to comply with all aspects of applicab le
building health and safety codes with masonry walls and one-hour
construction. The exterior of the restaurant will consist of terra cotta
roofing tiles, back pilasters, exposed heavy timber beams and textured.
stucco, composed in such a manner to suggest a Mediterranean theme to
reflect my place of origin. The interiors will also utilize much of the
same materials and will suggest the same theme.
As for my scheme of operation, it is not my intention to build a fancy
prestigious restaurant that only the wealthy and the expense account
crowd can afford. Rather, I intend that my restaurant will appeal to all
types of people and that all walks of life will feel comfortable coming
to and relaxing with good food and drink at my restaurant. I feel I
will not need gimmicks such as music, entertainment or dancing in order
to attract customers. i feel that good food served at reasonable prices,
accompanied with genial hospitality and a comfortable atmosphere, is all
that is required to assure the success of my operation. The menu I
intend to offer will be general and varied, leaning perhaps to steaks and
chops.
I wish to thank you for your deliberation and review of my application.
If I am the successful applicant for this license, I wish to assure the
Village officials and the public of my strong desire to become a good
neighbor to the Eden Prai rie Civic and Business Community.
Sincerely A /�
John Suback
JS/f p
-I - �'
1r , Ili t ti i
Z ,.. ,,,,,.....„ .
:�4k-,..„041,
s
,...,,,,,,_,-.,
_ . -,
•__ • s
...- -,.,-
a. . : iit its.. ,...-A • .,. .f'r;i ., -'
A
ilt;y4i,4 e i Pa . ' ' •. . . .V... ' ".14%/1:;•.. . , ..' -
1
_ .- ir
t _ '-LA , x
\. . 4,,,'",.:4::::L:,
H
ii
AI
i
. 4 a
1 I
Ov
:. .:.;3-:'.;,,:,..1,1'...
�.•
•
f
•
T t' M
.,
'4° <....----..1 1 - • ' lik Al'' ' ' i
; . ' _.1 7.-.'-74. . ....:4:.,..''C.:':..-':.- 'I.'
*pry i+
4,,' N."
4<\ ,,
iii
, . .
_7-I.,:.. . .
... .
..A .:'. \
•,.--4.. , .. „,.,..,, Alb illip. „
.. •-:,. 4
•• :.. a.
. . VO 44;',40 \
:tra> . . --'41f00 ° A47,11/44,,,\ • • . .4..
•• -.53 -.- X1
.1 - •
I• 310 ,, litir;1. .:.iL",rk, li,04,,. •‹..;,1` Nk..0,4,/,,„,
.' . Z i. ‹',4d'.' „, ., ,t,ce .., ?• .;,—*,40-''
' Z : 1%*44,44..4', , ' •43),-
_:',._ •2 vol• . , .. •
. , . /' \ . . . ":-;'•
nIntiPap„Al7E',10... N. ; ..
,,, -',,,.41,,,,t4tpt .., • • .1,•
I
• /
, 0 1,,i,:..,;„ al,, • 4 •
, ,.:. , •k4;'.• \ ,>-..„.
I r .4,: '‘..-.i. ‘' ..,•.:!
i f-
-,. i. '. :::, III
;- I .7- i -' . a .
,., lr"z ' i r- et
•.:7 i •' - ses 1.-
,..
T.,''
,
-1" ;'''s•
!.4.1 L..
.r 1
.- C ., l's•I *,., /.
41
: . C) • f ,•.'y
':1• I'''.\* . 11314 "
.:-.1 l:44! • • +,
,•37, ,•:•.-..... -,-.1',.,' A .
r) • .. ., , ';-------. i , ,
/' i I .1 i '•1 1
----.....
.
. .
, ?, -........"*"......„'
4110.4 fa,.:. . • .' I.
• •.1"r''' •
• i 4. ' lb) ..,4A, 1. . .... .
li
I R ..•J. .'I •
2 bil ..,i , e- ,• , 4. l' ,
. . ..
. ,
,4. ... .1
,' l..^ ,• -
.. '2.2, 1 ,., / it,'•,- " '
. ,
'Al,.
1
I ;
ik.•_,...„
I ,
, • ..
pi, IIII
.--
,
4. ..
1.-... _:.,,,..t::4r.,a 1.• • -•••••..) ...;...,
' ,..
,, 4,,,,. k• ..,, ' ' ' ,... ". i''
...
' '`'' :Tr.'`i'," , '../." ....• . . ' .. ".,,,.."•.,,, .'
.1=1 0...
1.711,,•...! _ .. .
11 . iw•• , . ,..; * '
4 i
.4. . . •..6.' -.?' , ' ,,,,.'..', ",r,
• 0,kt .
. -.,.....^`..r.'''.!9,,,.114- • ." 5, ' ',..i- .: `,,s,',
. . 2"."•„...* 6.44,,,..... .....,:,,,..:,,• „ • .,-.•:„..., ,.._ ,, .1._.
j *`) qwmat,tfe
„ . .
‘,
_ 4._- - .. „-
, •-, tiallailL.-- ' • - - - :- , - - '' ' ' .. ':
Ytraz a' ? a t—.:4..:, ••,-_.,._ . r.r., re_ ^--r'+ ,J 'f:albierdli kaldt . -,,.
c ;'�_- I e sc, 1s4 11 1 i y ✓ r r-7e,
•
y's,A L� < iit
_ n . phi. ' � . t:
t r ,µd .• )4" " ,`a
i M �®:iii�7
�_. ���, ,�. Cps
all
1.1 1.1 I.I � I.I 1,1 I. 4n
1,.0
.;ot. - ....,t,
u...L . ..., ., + . 1---1
LEES Iii ' •
I 1
' '�,I Q �I � '1 . ',4,::4 12
i H
. -...,. -------. il i I :11 a 01 0 0. 0 i 1,- ‘, ''''
} i ,# !!! :1 'sJ' : , jam y,
T T ':al
__ i �� i �I111JI111II111111111II1111111111 '
,..:„.. .,...r ., kd ..._._. 1 _______
ill
Will r inik.- ' lie
�t
.- (011 .., I'
1 c
I
it • . •` %
. I
- : • r{v,.;l� ,/'� �� • o o f: .. y ,.
a.fr wr►aa ate•- .._ ,. ,t .4. .. ..
.... . "' ri.trt 1 ..:,
T
. .. 1 \ I '
1 1 lN� `t1 '' 1: (
',1:
: --
�i 'fflinoi' 1::::-5,y L' I '� r lhrlr 1' L�l r
:ie`;" 1:,/
1 . 1 r t G . ? t t
Z> :7 .., ( „ 1 , 4.- t., ,,t,,,::) 4,I, ,Il wiciii4. .
, . :�,�.; ,' y .fir '''.•;wil+N� t i' „ ,
'';
..77/:;—. I t f 4, rt.,..., r, ,*:,,,,,. . t ,
tz Z 1fp
.C w I I^,'. i.r f
i W + 1 I .Ic I1
I > - ,4:....--. -',--,., . i ,/, 'e,1 ,----g 1 . ,
•
*,t i r •
• - s , , F' Sri .
t V"z'.
•
4.
•
1 ' /� 1 Fr , ..
f P' '
r w
e. ' t
.. ;
V‘*: $ ' i .."......1.77,71 7, , IF.
i'
1i ! f •-_?...: .. 4,• rs}" 3 1
•
r sI tj +. • t 'y►�•r �:,i'.-.-rI %1''. ,.:�AitY, ?, \
i ,;
ii , , !,. ,A: ;
•� t }10 tel.. .- . } ;tr •'1 1 t f
It t �. is 6, }.,:Ar.•. ,.. "' ,1 �t ,.-4r ��v4.. y�..
•
RESOLUTION NO. 805
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, the Village Engineer with the assistance of Barr Engineering
Company has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvement, to
wit:
I.C. 51-259, Project STM 73-4-17
Neill Lake Drainage District Improvements
and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE
OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The Village Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the
official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement
for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved
plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published
for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that
bids will be opened at 11:00 o'clock A.M. on Friday, February 1,
1974, and considered by the Council at 7s30 o'clock P.M. on
Tuesday, February 12, 1974, in the Council Chambers of the Village
Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed
with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check,
bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for 5i (percent)
of the amount of such bid.
Adopted by the Village Council on January 8, 1974.
David W. Osterholt, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frans, Village Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 806
WHEREAS, plans for Hennepin County Project No. 6019 showing proposed
alignment, profiles, grades, and cross-sections, together with specifications and
special provisions for the construction of County State Aid Highway No. 1 within
the limits of the Village as a County Aid Project have been prepared and presented
to the Village:
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said plans, specifications, and
special provisions be in all things approved.
Adopted by the Village Council on January 8, 1974.
David W. Osterholt, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frans, Village Clerk
j
•
v DATE: January 4, 1973
/ TO: Mayor& Members of Village Council
FROM: Marty Jessen, Director of Communit j rvices M•. .
THROUGH: Robert Heinrich, Village Manager
SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF BROWN & BLACKLO K PROPERTIES AT ANDERSON LAKES
FOR PARK PURPOSES
The Village presently holds options to buy on both the Brown and Blacklock
properties, the terms of which are attached to this report. This was done
in anticipation of the 1974 LAWCON and State Natural Resource funding
which was recently programmed by the Metropolitan Council and the State
Planning Agency
However, to date, this funding has not received final approval so we are
unable to make any final payment or take title to either of f these two
properties. The terms of the Brown option are agreeable to the Federal
Bureau of Outdoor Recreation Guidelines. These guidelines permit the
agency involved in the acquisition to take a contract for deed such as
the one specified in the Brown purchase agreement and option.
The terms of the Blacklock purchase agreement and option do not meet the
requirements of the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation. Under the terms in this
agreement, the Village would take title to the property immediately upon
deposit of monies in an escrow account at the First National Bank of Hopkins.
I've talked to the Blacklocks and they have agreed to a contract for deed
whereby the Vill age would make a payment of$15,600 on or before 2/15/74
with the balance to be deposited in the escrow account per a contract for
deed on or before 7/1/74. The terms for disbursement from the escrow
account would remain as specified on the purchase agreement attached. This
revised agreement does meet the requirements of tie Bureau of Outdoor
Recreation.
The present grant status for 1974 LAWCON and State Natural Resource funding
is as follows: all of the final documentation will be delivered to the State
Planning Agency on January 8, 1974. The environmental impact statement
for this project was previously prepared in conjunction with the LAWCON
Contingency Application and representatives of the Bureau of Outdoor
Recreation have indicated that this environmental impact statement will
suffice for this new application. In light of this, we are hopeful that final
111 approval will be received prior to July 1, 1974, the date of closing on each
of the contracts for deed proposed at this time.
MJ:kg
I
• curtain rod,, s.tslrse rods,drapery rods,lighting ks,s fixtures and bulbs,plumbing I
including al!garden bulbs,plants,shrubs and trees,all storm sash.storm doors,detachable vestibules,screens,awnt.a6s,an'
an
/ fixture•blinds tanks nd blinds), sum um television i antenna,rhere-
Stsnurs,hot water tanks and hearing plant (with any burners,tanks,sulkers and other equipment used in connection there-
.'
if any,used and
with),roarer dishwasher,
and garbage
gas disposal,
osa and ovens,
controls top the es mid centralf ll air ti P i P
[teat Jtlonrsid prom sus and ndudingaalsotthe following persnnalspr pc[y air condtuonmgequipment,
107, 829 g7 .� pOLLARS, a
•
• has this daysold to the buyer for the sum of:
all of which property the undersigned nine and g] 100ths
eight hundred twenty- l
thousand •���""'""�'
One hundred seven •
in the following manner: aauarY 15, 19Z4.. ,the dale of dosing.
Earnestnh then buyerh agreesein toi pay * and$30,000..00_ cash,on .J
Balance money herein paid S15,264.61. on or before July 1, 1974, together with interest at the rate
•
C 1973in to January 15,
of nnu Son the ut be paidma�f •
of 7�o pet'annum on the unpaid balance
1 of 1974 to the date of November�loei*6—�"nd.� a
— 1974 and on$62,565.26 from January
* Includes option money previously paid, which credit is being given.
Sellers shall have the right to rent said premises according to the terms of a lease, a copy of
which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Buyers shall pay the real estate taxes due in 1974.
•
Deed
......_.Ciunry
Subject to performance bypuse the if
any)ec the seller agrees to execute and deliver a-
o'ne in buyer
marketable titlee ea said premises subject only to the following exceptiom:
( be'mined ordinances.State and Federal regulations.
(a) Buildingi and lamng laws, improvement of premises without effective forfeiture provision.
(r) Restrictions relating use or impimprovements.
(rl Re and of any minerals car which rights to the State of Dlinnesor.a i ailments of special asv
not
•
do rebirth toesen as,cumcnes payable therewith
(e)Utilityit drainage follows: which specified,
not interfere with potent and any unP+ homestead classification
• Thse
of tenantsr shall as follows:the t:(unless spe twill be at,
The buyer pe the teal telestate taxes due in the yearth 5epartial or non-hemntesd—stare which)
(full,
end thereafter.Seller warrants that dal estate taxes due in the test 19�]� tie and agrees tc remove personal grope ng
are entirelwithin the oun d toelises of thehen o ailappliances, to rem sir all perenal p
Seller covenants that buildings,it any. ( provided that all conditions of this
jremixes are m proper workin•c Crderat date 01 ng�
not EncfThe hereinused and located on fad rainp e premises priorU3
and plumbing
The seller focuser lied to.Unlr possession not later thandate,this agreement shall
property is destroyed or substantially damaged by fire or any other cause before the closing
agreement have been complied with.Unless othernsse spccitied this sale shall be closed on or beEorc60 days from the date herco•
In the event this, th and all manes paid hereunder shall be refunded tot hie and city wane,and,in the case of
•
• become null buyerud void,at the p also mut s option, _, _ ._._.
The and seller mutually agree that pro rasa adjustments of rents,interest,
j current operating expenses,shall be made as of date of closing
income •
property,
The seller shall,within a reasonahte time after approval of this agreement,lurnssh an abstract of title,or a Registered Property
t make inchn title onstobe Pendingade i
' n dad.s afro receipt thereof for ,estmnatr:e so said title and the making of any obieay.i thereto, objections marketable.be made in
Abstract certified n,date m include proper searches cuv'e�.ng bankruptcies,and Sure and Federal lodgments and liens.The buyer shall
n
e,;:.eJ 1but shall be allowed
of days
d within 10 days after written notice
,. c.dent.i re be.,. d ie am•of n n`demade the selleratu , allowed n1 u0 d ide us
correction of ther are s shall
perform .- I
thde .thtis
m the buyer, parties shall this agreement a r 1 c n to v-tins. end said buYci shall
void,• n
and neither principal shall he liable for damages hereunder to the other principal.All money
this contract
If said title is not matkctablc and is nut made so within 1 days from
marketable oriMrsoenuJe within slid time, twse pros mac..,this
agreement shall le null and ea
paid It the any buyer shall re refunded.catsIf the title m busaid lot :Y .
Ipayments mad:ucron this uncurl shall be retained by said seller and said agent,as their respective interests
default in u!the agreements and continue in Jetault Inc a pc•u•+d ur 10 Jays,then and in that tat the seller may
any a such termination all the
may app•'ar.,+�I"pudau•J damapey,came hem.:of the essence hereof.This provision shall not deprave either party of the right of enforcing the
I f anion shall arise. .aX1Gf{K✓ '1RFRli n311F1Ftt�r ewTlt
specific pw'rEamai)f of this flsed i provided stub contract shall nor be terminated aso .and provided cdtieu to enforce such specific
RdR
performance shallY rt cat �within
sixnonths
+ such
ahs44Usrt''►'M1 w FM Y,rrnrsn •'T1-..
waosss+<Ms-a•,,,wwstrsat+s Y �h-Isn:Jntle� cAA 1 .....
els
dii'tcL•afa'atJ►IGJ.aJLLaafYfr lsablw Jt-r.styW+lalc"'rs'•°c'" �y. .7.'.. r l..•.. ,
•} T e delivery
1
The delivery of as papers and monies shall be made as the office o:
& SIMONS, -
P ERB1X, HARVEY P.A.Minnesota 5534
Hopkins,j 17 Tenth Avenue S Hop• a � I hereby R � purchase� for the price and
a rove agree to the said property fo alp peke and
1,the cn.!rnitneJ,sew err of the alsovr IanJ,do hereby PP uprsn the terms above mentioned,end subject the at ,' a;:rrcmcnt and the sale thcra:'yrY made.
ions •
herein expressed.
i i ! ro `i's '"an° ,' [.,'Y.��............_(SEAL) V[.htL.A,G.E.Vt..Eaf.i�,PI1JI1R(E�.r� or (SEAL)
i' ..iv(:, ,14r........
it o' ;xii.i fluter •PRAIRIE.,„,...
is a•.-/ .7 B - .
/ SEAL) sot Village Manager
X LroWU/ 1t%ZC
- �ry'ISLOWn. au
• including all garden bulbs,plants,shrubs and trues,all so arm sash,stung doors,detachable vestibules,screens,awnings,window
A shades, blinds (including venetian blinds),ctirnsin asks, rrav:rsc rods,drapery rods,lighting fixtures and bulbs,plumbing
• —fixtures,hot water tanks and heating plant (witls any burner.:,r inks,stokers and other equipment used in connection there-
) with),vsatct softener and liquid gas tank and osntrols (if the property of sated),sump pump,television antenna,iaeiner•
arotr,built-in dishwasher,garbage disposal,ovens, cook cop stoves and central air conditioning equipment,if any,used and
located on said premises and including also tlse following personal property:
all of which property the undersigned has this day sold to the buyer for the sum of:
EIGHTY-THREE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED SEVENTY-FOUR and 58/100 ($.83,874.58 )DOLLARS,
which the buyer agrees to pay in the following manner:
Earnest money herein paid$5a 874.58 and$15,600.00 ,cash,on or before 2/15/74 ,the date of closing.
•
as hereinafter set forth:
The balance of Sixty-two Thousand Four Hundred ($62,400.00) Dollars will be payable
•
by a note bearing interest at the rate of Five Per Cent (5%) per annum from the r
date of closing, said note to be secured by a deposit of $62,400.00 at the First
National Bank of Hopkins to be paid out against said note to the senora as follows:
0,5,600.00 plus interest at the rate of 5%, one year from the date
of closing; $15,600.00 plus interest, annually thereafter until the
full principal amount, plus interest, has been paid in full. It is
agreed that interest shall commence as of the date of closing and
shall be payable by the Village to the seller at the rate of 5% per
annum on the unpaid balance of said note. Any interest paid by
First National Bank of Hopkins shall be payable to the buyer.
It is also understood and agreed that the buyer herein cannot pay
more than one-third (1/3) of the principal amount in any one year,
but sellers agree to execute and deliver a Warranty Deed conveying
marketable title to the prenises t.the time of closing. Wunnty Deed
Subject to performance by the buyer the seller agree to execute and deriver a - -- .-' /'
(to be joined in by spouse,if any)conveying marketable till to said premises subject only to the following exceptions:
la) Building and zoning laws,ordinances.Stare and Federal regulations. 1
(b)Restrictions relating to use or improvement of premises without effectiveforfeiture provision.
(c) Reservation of any minerals or mmetal rights to the State of Minnesota.
Id)Utility and drainage easements which do not interfere with present improvements.
(e) Rights of tenants as follows: (unless specified.not subject to tµµncies)
The buyer shall Ivy die real estate taxes due in the year 19 D end any unpaid installments of special assessments v'ab!e shrews oh
and thereafter. uctinsocaxxxasSzsapscanuosacasamccoaacnCR
Seller covenants that buildings,if any,are entirely within the boundary lines of the property and agrees to remove all personal p:csprny •
not included herein and-all debris from the premises prior to possession date.Seller warrants all appliances,heating,air conditioning,wrong
and plumbing used and located on said premises are in proper working closingorder at date(ff ate g rovided that all mndirinns of this
The seller further agars to deliver pnsesswsn not later thanp •
agreement have been complied with.Unles,otherwise specified this sale shall be closed on or before 60 days from the date hereof.
In the event this property is destroyed or substantially damaged by sire or any lather cause before she closing date,this agreement shall
become null and void,at the purchaser's option,and all monies paid hereunder shall be refunded so him.
The buyer and seller also mutually agree tb:t pro rata adjuntmeem Ooffir�s,an gear.insurance and city water,and,in the case of
income property,current operating expenses,shall be nude a.of 1 um e
The seller shall,within a reasonable time alter approval of this agreement,furnish an abstract of title,or a Registered Property
Ahs:n.r cendied to date to include proper senses covering bankruptcies,and State and fcd:ral judgments and liens.The buyer shall be
all.red Ill days alter receipt thereof fat examination of said title and the making of any objections thereto,said tibmectiws m be made in
•r.1:-:ts. dd v aisra If 0,Mi., cttioas ere made the seller shall he allowed 120rday i totitl 'makel such d win ^rtle marketaoss oftetabl.ti Pend cg
g
.i . .:r L t ..I. e
to the buyer,we pavics shall p rf n s iho ac n t o-wad ti t ,use,. i
If said title is ma soar:stab.e anod o tint made sowithin 120 slays from the dare of wroten ohjesrions thereto a;above provided,this
r..ensect shall be null and void.as,d neirhsr prineipal shall be liable for damages hereunder to the other principal.All money theretofore
pod be the Inlet shall he tel undid.If the tide tss sand'mil,rrry be fa and marlsetable ec be so made within said rime and said buyer shad
tl,i.wlt ins.ray if d.e a.:reemcras and uavu:uc in defas:It tor a period of 10 days.then:rod in that case the seller may terminane this contract
and en stun nrmin nine.ill Elie payments wade up-in this umsracr shill be retained by said seller and said agent.as their respective interne
tr,sy appe .am It.pn hired dama,.os,line Ie III:of the yawns,he rent.1 firs prat isinn sl.all not deprive either party of the right of enforcing the
sp.cihc yxtrtormane of this conrrarr prn-n,'ed sou h contrail sb.JI not he rernunattd as aoresaid,and provided action so enforce such specific
pwttutniantc shall In tame menceJ V irh.1 SI%months toter swill right of team shall arm.. m
CIC.CifFesaun err oe'aCe a ae a e er�coxx cr�p sc�(u e a ove as rice
a an assessments � e s ep0 the
e b a d yes an assessments tie anti payab a the
year. me
I,the undersigned.owner of the slave lard,do hereby approse I hereby agree to purchase the said property for she price and •
the above atnYmcn[and the stye eta«by made• upon the term; above mentioned,and subject to all condition,
/; i / I) inter*"EDEN PRAIRIE
. ./.} ),---L: .�l,l,e--:.y.�..rf_.SEAL) BY.
Lesslie i.a Sala.;o k, e/\cat a r (SEAL)
Ns s lac 1cc r I r // yrc Buyer
/yClG4t s,r Ali. /i l'K.(t. '4 (SEAL) I (SEAL) '
France J. BIAcel k &Ike 1
Village Y!g). Byer
P y
I
MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL
Tuesday, January 9,1973 7:30 P.M., Village Hall
Members present were: Mayor Paul R. Redpath, Councilmen Penzel,
Cosmano and Councilwoman Joan Meyers. Also present was Village —
Manager, Robert P. Heinrich, Village Attorney W. Harlan Perbix
and Clerk, Edna M. Holmgren.
I. MINUIES OF DECEMBER 26, 1972
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to approve the minutes of December
26th as published with the following correction:
Page Two - Resolution& Ordinances - Item E. Voting aye were Nesbitt,
Redpath, McCulloch, Cosmano and Meyers unanimously. Motion carried.
With this correction, Mr. Cosmano seconded. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
II. OATH OF OFFICE: COUNCILMAN WOLFGANG PENZEL
Village Attorney, W.Harlan Perbix administered the oath of office
to Councilman Wolfgang Penzel. His term expires on December 31, 1975.
III. ELECTION OF ACTING MAYOR
Mr. Cosmano made a motion to nominate Mrs. Meyers as Acting Mayor. Mr.
Redpath seconded. All voted Nye. Motion carried.
IV. OFFICIAL DESIGNATIONS
A. 1973 Meeting Dates and Times -Resolution No. 626;
adopt Resolution No. 626
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to/designatlnbhe second and fourth
Tuesdays of each month as Council meeting dates at 7:30 P.M. in the
Village Hall. Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
B. Office Publication - Resolution No. 627.
A motion was made by Mr. Cosmano adopting Resolution No. 627 designating
the Minnetonka-Eden Prairie Sun as the official Village publication. Mr.
Redpath seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
C. Official Depository for Village Funds - Resolution No. 628.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers adopting Resolution No. 628 designating
the First National Bank of Hopkins as the official depository for Village
funds. Mr. Cosmano seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
Council Meeting
January 9, 1973
Page Two
D. Investment Authorization- Resolution No. 629
A motion was made by Mr. Colman° adopting Resolution Resolution
No. 629 authorizing the Village Treasurer to invest Eden Prairie —
Funds. Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
E. Signatory Authorization -Resolution No. 630
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to adopt Resolution No. 630 authorizing
persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and Treasurer to act for the
Village in transaction of any banking business and also the Acting
Mayor be authorized to sign checks as an alternate for the Mayor and
the Deputy Treasurer as an alternate for the Village Manager. Mr. Cosmano
seconded. All voted eye. Motion carried.
F. Facsimile Signatory Authorization- Resolution No. 631.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to adopt Resolution No. 631 author-
izing the use of facsimile signatures of the Mayor and Treasurer.
Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. Notion carried.
G. Authorization to Appropriate Federal Revenue Sharing for Public
Safety Purposes - Resolution No. 632.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel adopting Resolution No. 632 appropriat-
ing Federal Revenue Sharing for Public Safety purposes. Mr. Cosmano
seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
V. APPOINTMENTS
A. Suburban Rate Authority- Director and Alternate Director. Resol-
ution No. 633.
A motion was made by Mr. Cosmano adopting Resolution No. 633 appointing
the Village Manager as Director to the Suburban Rate Authority and Mr.
McCulloch as alternate. Mrs. Meyers seconded. All voted eye. Motion
carried.
B. Hennepin County League of Municipalities. Representative and
Alternates.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers appointing the Village Manager as
the representative to the Hennepin County League of Municipalities and
Mr. Penzel as alternate. All voted aye. Motion carried.
C. Park&Recreation Commission. Two Appointments for Three Year Term
plus Council Representative.
by Mr. Cosnano
A motion was made/to approve the Mayor's appointment of Richard Anderson
and William Garens for a three year term ending December 31, 1975 and
Steven Eisch as a youth member for a 1 year term. No appointment was
made for a Council representative at this time. Mr. Penzel seconded.
All voted aye. Motion carried.
I
Council Meeting
January 9, 1973
Page Three
D. Planning Commission. Two Appointments for Three Year Term plus
Council Representative.
A motion was made by Mr. Cosmano to approve the Mayor's appointment
of Wayne Brown and Richard Lynch to the Planning Commission fora term
of three years ending December 31, 1975 and Lisa Soderlind as a youth
member for a one year term. Mrs. Meyers was appointed as a Council
Representative. Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
E. Human Rights Commission. Three Appointments for Three Year Terms
plus Council Representative.
A motion was made by Mr. Cosmano to approve the Mayor's appointment
of Curtis Connoughty, Dorothy Pennie and Robert Williams to the Human
Rights Commission for a three year term ending December 31, 1975 and
Wolfgang Fenzel as the Council Representative. Mrs. Meyers seconded.
All voted aye. Motion carried.
F. South Hennepin Human Services Planning Board Appointment of Two
Representatives.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to appoint Alden Kieski, the Village
Manager and Dr. George Tangeman for terms to expire January 1, 1975
and Wolfgang Penzel to expire January 1, 1974. Mr. Cosmano seconded.
All voted aye. Motion carried.
G. Board of Appeals. Five Appointments for One Year Terms.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to approve the Mayor's appointment
of Paul Choiniere, Anthony Hirt, Jerrold Miller, Roger Pauly and
James Wedlund to the Board of Appeals for a one year term ending
December 31, 1973. Mrs. Meyers seconded. All voted Nye. Motion
carried.
H. Village Attorney. Appointment by Manager.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to approve W. Harlan Perbix as
Village Attorney as recommended by the Village Manager for the year
1973. Mr. Cosmano seconded. All voted Nye. Motion carried.
VI. McAllister Properties 7Zderson Lakes P1 ed Unit Development.
Mr. Asl is and Ri and Putnam, Vill e P er revi we and presented
the Ande son Lakes lanned Unit Deve ent Quoted 1 acres of lead
south o I-494 on a eastern bound of Ed Prai a an Blomdngton
north Anderson, es.
ii
Council Meeting
January 9, 1973
Page Four
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. McAllister Properties. Anderson Lakes Planned Unit Development.
Mr. Aslandis, Midwest Planning and Richard Putnam, Village Planner
reviewed and presented the Anderson Lakes Planned Unit Development
located on 15 acres of land south of I-494 on the eastern boundary
of Eden Prairie and Bloomington north of Anderson Lakes. It is
proposed that land usage of the 15 acres will have 4.15 acres as
residential development and 10.85 acres as permanent open space.
32 townhouses are proposed to sell from $25,000 to $45,000 and the
130 apartment/condominiums in the $25,000 to $50,000 range.
Numerous questions were asked by the Council and residents of the
Anderson Lakes area in Eden Prairie and Ensign Road residents in
Bloomington. They were concerned about the traffic problems that
160 dwelling units would create on West 78th Street and the overload
on the intersection of 78th and County Road 18. Mrs. Meyers was
concerned whether there would be a scenic easement or dedication of
land on Anderson Lakes that is included in the project. She was
informed that land would be dedicated. Petitions were submitted
from the Anderson Lakes Property Owner's Assoc. and the Ensign
Road residents objecting to the project. Mr. Putnam concurred
that the Anderson Lakes and Ensign Road residents had a valid
reason to be concerned about traffic problems and recommended
that the matter be referred back to the Planning Commission for
a traffic study.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to approve the Village Planner's
recommendation. Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. Letter from Warren Myers, President - Snowdrifters, Inc.
A letter dated December 22, 1972 from the Snowdrifters offering their
services to the Village was received and filed. Public Safety Director,
Jack Hacking was informed of the letter.
VIII. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
A. Resolution No. 634 Authorzing Mayor and tanager to Sign Agreement
with Shelter Development Corporation, Briarhill Aprtment Project.
A motion was made by Mr. Cosmano to adopt Resolution No. 634 authorizing
the Mayor and Village Manager to sign an agreement with Shelter Develop-
ment Corp. providing for the Briarhill apartment project to be assessed
at twenty percent of the market value rather than 5%. Mrs. Meyers
seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
Council Meeting
January 9, 1973
Page Five
B. Resolution No. 635 Authorizing Mayor and Village Manager to Sign
the Agreement with Minneapolis Chapter of the American Institute
of Architects, Windslope Apartment Project.
A motion was made by Mr. Cosmano to adopt Resolution No. 635 authorizing the Mayor and Village Manager to sign an agreement with Minneapolis
Chapter of the American Institute of Architects providing for the
Windslope apartment project to be assessed at 20% of the market value
rather than 5%. Mr. Penzel seconded. All voted Nye. Motion carried.
C. Resolution No. 636, Authorizing Approval of Contract with Suburban
Hennepin County Relief Board for 1973.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to adopt Resolution No. 636 authorzing
approval of contract with Suburban Hennepin County Relief Board for
administration and supervision of poor relief during 1973. Mrs. Meyers
it
seco ded. All voted Nye. Motion carried. .
C. �.,I"/. � T;o-� 7 ��.,.�..,.� ,ci t. �„e ,,t f 11.E,_J a Z P .;/_Y
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS, AND COMMISSIONS 4
A. Manager's Reports:
1. 1973 Employee Compensation Program. Resolution No. 620.
A motion was made by Mr. Cosmano to adopt Resolution No. 620 for
the 1973 employee compensation program. Mr. Penzel seconded. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
2. Presentation of Engineering Feasibility Report for the Extension
of Sanitary Sewer Along West 78th Street from Purgatory Creek to
Rosemount Engineering Company. Resolution No. 637.
Mr. Dave Huseby presented and reviewed the engineering feasibility for the
extension of sanitary sewer along West 78th Street. A motion was made by
Mr. Penzel to adopt Resolution No. 637 setting a hearing date on February
13, 1972 at 7:30 p.m. for this project. Mrs. Meyers seconded. All voted
aye. Motion carried.
3. Consideration of Task Force Recommendation for Community Education
Program.
Councilman Cosmano reviewed the proposed Community Education Program. He
noted that the Community Education Coordinator will work with program
managers for the School District and the Village in developing and
implementing detailed programs to meet community needs. The coordinator
would be on the School District's payroll and covered with their fringe
benefit plan and officed at the Village Hall. The Village share of the
program is $5,581.50 with $2,500 of this to be for clerical work rather
than direct cash outlay. The remaining $3,081.50 would be paid to the
School District. The Manager informed the Council that an applicant
had been selected that he felt was an excellent man for the positicm.
A motion was made by Mr. Cosmano to approve the Task Force recommendation
for a Ccaunity Education program end hire a coordinator, the Village
share of the cost to be $5,581.50. Mr. Penzel seconded. On roll call
all voted aye. Motion carried.
Council Meeting
January 9, 1973
Page Six
4. Acceptance of Certain Lands from Northern States Power Co.
Adjacent to I-494 North of Topview Acres and Along Nine Mile
Creek.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to accept certain lands from Northern
States Power along Nine Mile Creek. Mr. Cosmano seconded. All voted
aye. Motion carried.
The Village Manager was instructed to write a letter of thanks to
Northern States Power Co.
X. BIDS
A. Award Bid for Water Meters to Water Products Company for the
Rockwell Meter in the Amount of$38.77 Each.
The Manager reviewed John Frame's January 3, 1972 recommendation
on water meters. He stated that Water Products Company bidding
the Rockwell meter will repair these meters at no cost to the
Village no matter what the cuase for a period of 5 years. It will
be a 2 year bid with an option to renew.
A motion was made by Mr. Penzel to approve the Water Products Co.
bid tucthinacketaritcitgornnuodt for Rockwell meters in the amount
of $38.77 each. Mrs. Meyers seconded. On roll call, all voted aye.
Motion carried.
XI. FINANCES
A. Payment of Claims No. 1203 through 1250.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to approve payment of claims No. 1203
through 1250. Mr. Penzel seconded. Ex On roll call, all voted aye.
Motion carried.
B. Cash&Investment Report.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to accept the Cash & Investment Report
dated January 4, 1973 for review. Mr. Cosmano seconded. All voted aye.
Motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 10:30 P.M.
Edna M. Hoimgren, Clerk
,.
EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL
Tuesday, January 9, 1973 7:30 P.M., Village Hall
INVOCATION -- PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE-- ROLL CALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Paul Redpath, John McCulloch, Jran Meyers,
John Cosmano, and Wolfgang Penzel
COUNCIL STAFF: Village Manager Robert P. Heinrich; Village
Attorney Harlan Perbix; Clerk Edna Holmgren
AGENDA
I. MINUTES OF DECEMBER 26, 1972, MEETING
II. OATH OF OFFICE: Councilman Wolfgang Penzel
V III. ELECTION OF ACTING MAYOR
IV. OFFICIAL DESIGNATIONS
/A, 1973 Meeting Dates and Times -Resolution No. 626.
/B. �icial Publication-Resolution No. 627.
X. Official Depository for Village Funds-Resolution No. 628.
ID. Investment Authorization -Resolution No. 629.
✓E. Signatory Authorization — Resolution No. 630.
IF. Facsimile Signatory Authorization-Resolution No. 631.
JG. Authorization to appropriate Federal Revenue Sharing for Public
Safety Purposes -Resolution No. 632.
V. IiPPOINTMENTS (Attachments)
A. Suburban Rate Authority -Director and Alternate Director. Resolution
No. 633. Appointments by Council.
✓B. Hennepin County League of Municipalities. Representative and
Alternates. Appointments by Council.
(VC• Park and Recreation Commission. Two Appointments for Three Year
Term Plus Council Representative. Appointments by Mayor with
Consent of Council.
�D. Planning Commission, Two Appointments for Three Year Terms Plus
Council Representative. Appointments by Mayor with Consent of
/ Council.
y E. Human Rights Commission, Three Appointments for Three Year Terms
Plus Council Representative. Appointments by Mayor with Consent
of Council.
V F. South Hennepin Human Services Planning Board Appointment of Two
Representatives. Appointment by Council.
✓
G. Board of Appeals. Five Appointments for One Year Terms. Appointments
by Mayor with Consent of Council.
J H. Village Attorney. Appointment by Manager Subject to the Approval of
the Council.
1
i.e ,
Council Agenda
January 9, 1973
Page Two
VI J PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. McAllister Properties, Anderson Lakes Planned Unit Development.
(Report Attached)
—
Action: Motion approving McAllister Properties, Anderson Lakes Planned
Unit Development Concept Plan as submitted in the brochure, based
on terraced style unit with a maximum number of 162 units and
with construction to begin within one year.
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
JA. Letter from Warren Myers, President - Snowdrifters,_Inc_ dated
12/22/72 offering their services to the Village. (Attached)
Action: Receive and file.
VIII. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
A. Resolution No. 634 authorizing Mayor and Village Manager to execute
agreement with Shelter Development Corporation providing for the
Briarhill apartment project to be assessed at twenty percent (20%)of the
market value rather than five percent (5%).
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 634.
JB. Resolution No. 635. authorizing Mayor and Village Manager to execute
agreement with Minneapolis Chapter of the American Institute of
Architects providing for the Windslope apartment project to be assessed
at twenty percent (20%)of the market value rather than five percent (5%).
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 635.
C. Resolution No. 636 authorizing approval of contract with Suburban
Hennepin County Relief Board for administration and supervision of
poor relief during 1973. (Attached)
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 636.
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS, AND COMMISSIONS
A.i Manager's Reports:
, 1. 1973 Employee Compensation Program. Resolution No. 620. (Report
, attached)
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 620, 1973 Employee Compensation
Program, as set forth in memo dated 12/22/72.
i
Council Agenda
January 9, 1973
Page Three
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICES BOARDS AND_CO_M__MISSIONS jpostinued)
A. Manager's Reports (continued) W
2. presentation of Engineering feasibility r r� ._.the extension of
/ sanitary sewer along West 78th Street from Purgatory Creek to
Rosemount Engineering Company. (Attached)
Action: Motion adopting Resolution No. 637 setting a Hearing for the
proposed improvement project for 7:30 p.m. on February 13,1973.
J 3. Consideration of Task Force recymmendation for Community Education
Program. (Attached;-recommendation and Community Education
Coordinator Job Description)
Action: Motion endorsing Community Education Program as recommended
by Task Force.
1 4. Ageptance Of V,erteln Lands from Northem_Sta_tesiower Company
adjacent to 494 north of Topview Acres and along Nine Mile Creek.
Action: Motion accepting certain lands from Northern States Power Co.
adjacent to 494 north of Topview Acres and along Nine Mile Creek.
X. BIDS
.JA. Award bid for 5/8" x 3/4" size meter (meter for single family dwellings)
to Water Products Company for the Rockwell Meter in the amount of
$38.77. (Report attached)
I
Action: Motion accepting Water Products Company bid.
XI. FINANCES
IA.A. Payment of Claims No. 1203 to 1250. (Attached)
Action: Motion approving payment of Claims No. 1203 to 1250.
B. Cash and Investment Report.
Action: Motion accepting Cash and Investment Report.
XII. ADJOURNMENT.
0
V
__ f w• I
g' 7 . 741144,4 . — Q , e
77114.,c/ /e
a - 'n7/a 6,210 -ir/L
,6, - e 4z7 /e
a- - /e- ‘,z.8 `"/e_
z , -ty e- 3 0 ,t/e._
e - -777/ / 43/ Td-
i ..e/ c____ ‘. z `Ails
z , �/m /e L33 ln _
irr - mt. 'Pr_
,7 7)^,f r t i, ';;': 4.L ad-,-it&g"
--- - `7,7/( 7017c._
-ge.— Y&fAZZ.
e/, -rye_
I. dcakert.- 4.2.--4,
�,,o � . AP...
. f
_ _ e + 6
me_
0/171 azikit yiiite„,iitize_..
ifrilkd' At,,J /9%C.
4)iik ir , 7 ..... Ja. .. .051,
//7"4"--14144""—Wye_
4 — Let 1^4, 44 -
1' frill
•
4'- 414
.---c a- a _
t.
<-,...„ 11.- a- ,61-..,,,,,,..,;7 — 41-€2,,:ef) Y-fizeo/ '
:iii-1-4-----g„ o..../7-it.-- L.63 vivc.
a .4e,94 77-
a:ea 9< -
/-. 47.0
4.4A41 >77yz
�- Omo-0.p ./
�cZr� 4 — ��.�e
7 2,4 I-i.r�y, — ✓rrt
e/ 'Ale_ ,-r-rvej
&21-`-"41,) 4
i((ff,.c�t A.,g,fig,t-4-ree„ a so
yam' nl" _ k• olftitg,ki
duo,/-, /�,� �
01,7- 779/e...)
, o7ii L._ 6-11
1444
- " y
-
_Tr
(G-) /1 3 -/09-S"0 --
-in//
"7/77 1/.5/
/ 5o -^_
mnuTES
EDEN PRAIRIE VILLAGE COUNCIL
Tuesday, December 26, 1972 7:30 P.M. Village Hall
Members present were: Mayor Paul R. Redpath, Councilmen Nesbitt,
Cosmano and McCulloch and Councilwoman Joan Meyers. Also present
was Village Attorney Harlan Perbix and Finance Director John Franc.
I. Oath of Office: Public Safety Officers: Bill 0. Blake, Leslie K.
Bridger, Curtis R. Oberlender, Keith J. Wall, and Bruce E. Wojack.
Mr. Perbix read the oath of office end swore in the above named
public safety officers with the exception of Bruce E. Wojack who
was ill. Mrs. Meyers presented each with their badges after which the
officers were congratulated by council members. Fire Chief Ray Mitchell
and Assistant Chief Gene Jacobsen were also present to offer congratulations.
Mr. Hacking thanked the fire department for the purchase of their official
badges.
II. Presentation of Distinguished Citizen Award for Ralph J. Nesbitt in
appreciation of service. Resolution No. 619.
Mayor Redpath read the read the resolution and Mrs. Meyers moved that
Resolution No. 619 be adopted. Mr. Cosmano seconded. The motion
carried unanimously.
Mr. Nesbitt expressed his thanks to the community for the honor of
• serving Eden Prairie.
III. Minutes of Regular Meeting Held December 12, 1972.
A motion was made by Mr. Nesbitt to approve the December 12 minutes as
published. Mr. McCulloch seconded. All voted eye. Motion carried.
IV, Public Hearings
A. Round Lake Estates, Final Plat approval.
Mrs. Meyers moved that Resolution No. 621, Round Lake Estates, Final
Plat approval be adopted with the stipulation that park dedication be
worked out and subject to the development entering a Village satisfactory
developer's agreement. Mr. Nesbitt seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Edenvale 4th Addition, Final Plat Approval.
Mr. Nesbitt moved to adopt resolution 622, Edenvale 4th addition, final
Plat approval subject to the development entering a Village satisfactory
developer's agreement. Mr. Cosmano seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
V. Petitions. Requests and Ccmmunicaticns
A. Letter from Mr. and Mrs. Wayne Chapman.
The letter was read by Mr. Franc and received for filing.
B. Letter dated December 18, 1972, from Eden Prairie School District 272.
Village Planner, Dick Putnam, said that a meeting was proposed to get the
Preserve, Olympic Hills and Rusted Realty together to determine what the
school needs were going to be. Park and Recreation Commission will be
consulted. Letter received for filing.
Council Meeting
December 26, 1972
Page Two
V. C. Letter dated December 12, 1972, from Albert H. Newman, Attorney.
Received for Filing.
D. Letter dated December 8, 1972, from City of Bloomington.
Mrs. Meyers moved that Resolution 624 be adopted substituting Eden Prairie
for Bloomington. Mr. Cosmano seconded. Carried unanimously.
VI. Resolutions and Ordinances
A. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 196. Reclassification Rural District
R1 13.5, Hidden Ponds.
Mrs. Meyers moved to approve Ordinance No. 196 with the stipulation that
the accesses, entering onto the East-Flest Parkway, of three lots be
eliminated from the platting. Mr. Cosmano seconded. All voted aye.
Motion carried.
Mrs. Meyers moved that Resolution No. 625 be adopted amending Resolution
No. 613 which approved the preliminary plat, Phase 1. The amendment
requires that the accesses, entering onto the East-Neat Parkway, of three
lots be eliminated from the platting. fir. Cosmano seconded. All voted
aye. Motion carried.
B. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 197. Creating Dept. of Public Safety.
A motion was made by Mr. Nesbitt to approve the second reading of
Ordinance No. 197. Fr. McCulloch seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
C. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 198. Regulating and Licensing
Scavengers, Requiring permits and imposing penalty.
A motion was made by Mr. Cosmano and seconded by Mr. Nesbitt to approve
the second reeding of Ordinance 198. Motion carried unanimously.
D. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 199. Amending Ordinance No. 34,
Individual Sewage Systems and Installers.
Mrs. Meyers moved thit the second reading of Ordinance No. 199 be approved.
Mr. Nesbitt seconded. Carried unanimously.
E. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 200. Amending Ordinance No. 156,
licensing Contractors of 1 and 2 family dwellings.
A motion was made by Mr. Cosmano and seconded by Mr. Nesbitt to ape.ove the
second reading of Ordinance 200 with the following change in Section 3 --
License Required for Contractors of One and Two Family Dwellings: No person,
except an owner for personal use and occupancy, shall construct, reconstruct,
extend, alter or repair any one or two family dwelling in the Village
unless such person shall hold a valid contractors license, bond and
insurance as stated hereunder. Voting eye were Nesbitt, Redpath, McCulloch,
Cosmano; voting nay was Meyers.
F. Second Reading -Ordinance No. 201. Amending Ordinance No. 157 Water
Softening and Filtering.
A motion was made by Mrs. Meyers to approve the second reading of Ordinance
201. Mr. McCulloch seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
• VII. Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions
A. Report of Councilwoman Joan Meyers:
1. Progress Report from Southwest Suburban CATV Study Commission.
Mrs. Meyers elaborated on the report and informed the Council that
professional counsel would be sought.
B. Manager's Report:
1. Report of Consultant Engineer concerning Sewer and Water Service to
Northwest Corner of Eden Prairie--Hidden Ponds.
Mr. Loren Irvine indicated that both officials of Chanhassen and
affected residents, with whom he recently spoke, are in favor of
having the trunk put in.
The report was referred to the Village Manager who will take
appropriate action which will include consulting Chanhassen officials.
2. 1973 Employee Compensation Program. Resolution No. 620.
This was removed from the agenda.
3. Change Order ,/6, Northern Contracting Co. Nine Mile One Trunk
Sanitary Sewer. Topsoil and seed. on south slope of W. 66th St.
North of Forest Hills School.
Mr. Nesbitt moved that Change Order 6, Northern Contracting Co., be
approved. Mr. Cosmano seconded. Carried unanimously.
4. Change Order iry, Orfei & Sons. Topview Sanitary Sewer and
Watermain (Lateral), Changes in Sewer and Water Service Size
and Location as per request of Howard Kaerwer, Resident.
Mrs. Meyers moved that Change Order , Orfei &Sons, with the
contract amendment of an increase of $146.12 to be approved.
Mr. Nesbitt seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
C. Village Clerk Reports:
1. Village Clerk's recommended License Application List.
Mrs. Meyers moved that the application of Joseph Ruzic for the
Brandin' Iron, Cigarettes and Beer On/Off on the Village Clerk's
License Application List be approved. Mr. Cosmano seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
VIII. Finances
A. Payment of Claims No. 1140 to 1202.
Mr. Nesbitt moved that Claims 11.40 to 1202 be approved for payment. Mr.
Cosmano seconded. All eyed during roll call.
B. 1972 Budget Appropriation Adjustments, Resolution No. 623.
Mr. Nesbitt moved that Resolution 623 be adopted. Mr. Redpath seconded.
All eyed during roll call.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.n.
Bee Lane, Acting Secretary
•
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, DTOMESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 6'i'`
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE OFFICIAL
MEEE'TING DATES, TIME AND PLACE FOR TAE
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAM IE COUNCIL MEETINGS
IN 1973
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Village Council of the Village of Eden
Prairie, Minnesota that they meet on the second and fourth Tuesdays
of each month at 7:30 p.m. in the Eden Prairie Village Hall, 8950
Eden Prairie Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
ADOPTED by the Village Council of the Village of Eden Prairie
this 9th day of January, 1973.
it
Paul R. Redpatb, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk
fig
4 1.
VILLAGE OF MEN FRAME
Iizlc'EPIIV COUNTY, MINNFLOTA
RESOLUTION E0. 2.
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING TIC .NII I-
ETONISA-EDEN PRAIRIE SON'AS THE
OFFICIAL IIWSPAPrRt FOR 1973
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Village Council of the Village of Eden
Prairie, Minnesota that the Sun Newspapers,Minnetonka-Eden Prairie
edition be designated as the official Village newspaper for the year
1973.
ADOYxt.i) by the Village Council of the Village of Eden Prairie
this 9th day of January, 1973.
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST;
SEAL
Edna M. Holsgren, Clerk
I4
VILLAGE OF r:DRE PRAIRIE
HENI EPIN COUNTY, 1 Ci SOTA
RESONiTIoN NO. ` - a
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORY
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HOPKI.D'S
BE IT RESOLVED, that the First National Bank of Hopkins,
Minnesota, authorized to do banking business in Minnesota be and
hereby is designated as an Official Depository for the Public
Funds of the Village of Eden Prairie, County of Hennepin, Minnesota,
for a period of one year from this date. The Village Treasurer
shall secure and maintain adequate security for funds in the deposit-
ory.
ADOPTED by the Village Council on January 9th, 1973.
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk
4
i
VILI.EL.E OF ELEN -PRAIRIE
}MENEM;COUNTY, YaNNESOT.A
RESOLLTION NO, G Z
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TREASURER TO INVEST VILLAGE
OF EDEN PRAIRIE FUNDS IN TRIO FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF
HOPKINS, NORTWESTERN NATIONAL BANK OF HO?KINS, FIRST
NATIONAL BANK OF NS.'VNEAPOLIS, NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK
OF NCNNEAPOLIS, CHA c{ASSHHN STATE BANK OF CHHANHASSEN, GLEN
LAB STATE BANK OF MINNETON'KA, FIRST EDINA NATIONAL BARK,
FIRST SOUTHDAIFE NATIONAL BANK OF EDINA AND SOU:c +EST
FIDELITY STATE BANK OF EDINA IN:
CERTIFICA"ES OF DEPOSITS, SAVINGS ACCOUNTS, U.S. GOVERN 2a.
NOTES ANTI BILLS, STATE Orr' MMESOTA NOTES, FEDERAL GOVERN-
KENT AGENCY BONDS APO NOTES AS AL'T'HORIZED BY STATE STATUTE.
BE IT RESOLVED,by the Village Council of the Village of Eden
Prairie, County of Hennepin authorizing the Treasurer to invest Village
of Eden Prairie funds in. the above banks in Certificates of Deposits,
Savings Accounts, U. S. Government Notes and Bills, State of Minnesota
Notes, and Federal Government Agency Bonds and Notes as authorized by
State Statute. The Village Treasurer shall secure and maintain adequate
security for funds deposited.
ADOPTED by the Village Council on January 9, 1973.
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk
VILLAU OF EDDN PRAIRIE
hMtiNnPLN COUD.71, X7u'N ESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 63 Q
BE IT RESOLVED, that the persons holding office as Mayor, Manager
and Treasurer of the Village of Eden Prairie, be and they hereby are,
authorized to act for this Village in the transaction of any banking
business with First National Bank of Hopkins, (hereinafter referred to
as the bank), such authority including authority on behalf of or in the
from time to time and until written notice to the
name of the Village
bank to the contrary, to sign checks against said account, which checks
will be signed by the Mayor, Manager and Village Treasurer. The bank
is hereby authorized and directed to honor and pay any check against
such account which is signed as above described, whether or not said
check is payable to the order of, or deposited to the credit of, any
officer or officers of the Village, including the signer or signers
of the check.
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED, that the Acting Mayor be authorized to sign
checks as an alternate for the Mayor and that the Deputy Treasurer be
authorized to sign checks as an alternate for the Village Manager.
ADOPTED by the Village Council on January 9, 1973.
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
A�1hST;
SEAL
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk
r /!� r
G
1
VILLAGE OF EDEE PRAIRIE
F NNERIN COUNTY, yaIZESOTA
RESOLUTION No. G 3 r
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING USE OF FACSDCLE
SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS
BE IT RESOLVED that the use of facsimile signatures by the
following named person:
PAUL R. REDPAT:i, MAYOR
JOIN D. FRAM, TREASURER
on checks, drafts, warrants, warrant-checks, vouchers or other orders
on public funds deposited in the First National Bank of Hopkins be
and hereby is approved, and that each of said named. persons may
authorize said depository bank to honor any such instrument bearing
his facsimile signature in such form as he may designate and to charge
the same to the account in said depository bank upon which drawn, as
fully as though it bore his manually written signature, and that
instruments so honored shall be wholly operative and binding in favor
of said depository bank although such facsimile signature shall have
been affixed without his authority.
ADOPTED by the Village Council on January 9, 1973.
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
Edna M. Holmgren, Clerk
VILLAGE OF aDEN PRAIRIE
HEN SPIN COZTY, YaNNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. G s Z.
A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING FEDERAL
REVENUE SEARING FOR PUBLIC SAFETY
PURPOSES.
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the Village of Eden Prairie
use its Federal Revenue Sharing to fund Public Safety Personal
Services expenditures.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that transfers from the Federal
Revenue Sharing Fund to the General Fund are hereby authorized for
the above purpose; the balance in the Federal Revenue Sharing Fund
shall not be less than zero.
ADOPTED by the Council of the Village of Eden Prairie on
the 9th day of January, 1973.
Paul R. Redpath, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
Edna X. Hoimgren, Clerk
LAW OFFICES
HOWARD,LEFEVERE,LEFLER,HAMILTON AND PEARSON
CHARM I NOWANO 8:00 PINT NATIONAL DANI1 SUILOINO
CLAYTON L.Le r:V:N: MINNCAPOLI s,MINN ESOTA 111114071 ON[
P. (•18)333-0543
JOSEPN:.NAMILTON
CUNTI'A.PEANSON
J.DIANI/C•NI[N
JOHN C.DRAW: •
JOHN II.OCAN
JOHN C.DICHL
DAV/D J. :DT December 12, 1972
TO: Clerks of All Municipalities Belonging
to the Suburban Rate Authority
Enclosed are two copies of a resolution designating the
director and alternate director from your community to the
Suburban Rate Authority. As soon as your council has appointed
your representatives to the Suburban Rate Authority for 1973,
please send one completed copy of the resolution and certificate
to me.
Very truly yours,
oC..04 .Rnw�s.
ClaytdL. LeFevere
Attorney
Suburban Rate Authority
CLL:gem
Enclosures
•
•
•
•
S iAFr PLANNING REPORT
PROJECT: Anderson Lake P.U.D.
APPLICANT: McAllister Properties, Inc.
LOCATION: South of 494, west of the Eden Prairie-Bloomington
boundary north of Anderson Lake.
R EQUEST: Concept Plan Approval for the proposed residential
development.
GENERAL COMMENTS:
Important to any land use consideration for the Anderson Lake P.U.D. site
must be the numerous external site features. These features are physical,
such as the impact of 494; social due to the single family residential to the
east; and political because of the adjacent zoning for industrial and resi-
dential. Of great significance is the exact type building proposed. I am
evaluating the specific style unit proposed and not the multiple use in general
because the constraints of the site require specialized solutions.
R ELATIONSHIP TO EDEN PRAI t�IE COMPR EHENSWE GUIDE PLAN & ZONING:
The 1968 Guide Plan indicates the land adjacent to 494 from Eden Prairie's
eastern boundary to the 232/494 interchange as industrial land with the open
space preservation along the creek to the north and Anderson Lake to the
south. It must be remembered that the Guide Plan indicated concepts that
would influence development. The concepts may still be valid today, such as
the Major Center Area or Purgatory Creek corridor, but the exact type uses
may have changed. Indicating industrial usage implies an intense use of
the land. McAllister Pioperties have examined the site carefully and have
concluded the Industrial/Office usage, at this time, is not appropriate and
multiple residential makes better economic and site preservation sense. My
opinion is that this decision is correct.
TPANSPORTATION CONSIDERATIONS:
Today the site is close to the Hwy. 18 and 494 diamond interchange, acces-
sible along West 76th Street. The access west today is to 169 and 494 at
the "Y" about one mile from the site. Future plans are for West 78th Street
to connect to the M.C.A. ring road just east of the "Y", and that 18 and 494
will become a non-local access interchange when 369 is constructed. There
would be a bridge over new 169 which would connect West 76th St. to Bush
Lake Road In Bloomington. The direct access to 494 that the site enjoys today
would be reduced when 169 is constructed, which could be 20 years from now.
Most of the trips that are not local In nature will go east to 1 6 and on to 494.
Those of local shopping, school, community, etc. would be directed west on
West 78th to the ring route. The capacities of West 78th are adequate to
handle the 900 trips/day expected from this project.
Internal project circulation will serve the units directly without conflict with
other property owners or the Village system. The street that serves the
STAFF PLANNING REPORT
Page 2
multiple unit should have a turnaround of sufficient size to allow emergency
vehicle access. Also, some type of emergency vehicle access must be
provided to the southerly end of the hillside multiple unit. The units must
accommodate the turnaround requirements of emergency townhouse vehicles.
PROTECT OBJECTIVES:
"Control changes of existing grades to a minimum . . . and minimize impact
upon natural character of site" responds directly to needs of the site.
Protection of the natural lakeshore 250 feet from the water does satisfy that
objective. The units proposed, townhouse and terraced, underground parking,
hillside multiple responds to the steep slopes and heavily wooded north slope.
The orientation of the units is toward the site amenities of Anderson Lake and
the woods, and the housing types proposed are well suited to each site.
The price of the units would not encompass a broad income range since they
would be in the $30,000 and up category. The high cost of the unit's con-
struction would rule out the low-moderate income ranges. The adjacent single
family homes are in the $40,000 plus bracket,which should be rather compatible
with the proposed units.
The economic viability of this project is important due to the high land value
and the untried unit type proposed. The economics of the proposal are
important at the concept stage because approval of the multiple unit is based
heavily upon the structural type and plan proposed.
SITE PLAN ANALYSIS:
Siting of the multiple unit on the southeast slope does as little damage as
possible to the natural vegetation and flood plain area. The 20 to 30 foot
cut required will permit total underground parking on two levels. The plaza
court space provides two side exposure for most units and a unique recreation
space. The effect on the natural lakeshore should be minimized by "barrier
plantings" along the lake to discourage man's intrusion.
The northerly slope facing the freeway is heavily wooded in two areas,
which are being preserved with townhouses clustered around the groves. The
siting cif the units in the townhouse area should be carefully examined as they
relate to noise levels from 494 and West 78th. The location of garages and
non-windowed walls could greatly reduce the freeway noise. When develop-
ment stage approval is requested, these factors would be studied closely.
SUMMARY:
The building of housing on this site is highly desirable because it provides
a compatible transition from the industrially zoned land west to the single
family units to the east. Also, the preservation of the natural land form and
vegetation is highly desirable rather than extensive grading. The 250 foot
public land dedication along Anderson Lake will open the park space around
the lake to the Bloomington residents as well as protecting the shore.
�• STAFF PLANNING REPORT
Page 3
The success and critical factor in any approval of the multiple unit is the
design concept used. McAllister Properties is proposing a terraced townhouse/
apartment building, either for sale or rental. Approval of the multiple dwelling
use is directly related to the unit type proposed in the brochure. A major
design change in the multiple building would nullify the concept approval of
that part of the proposal and would require resubmission to the Planning
Commission of another building typel
Construction of the project as proposed would be a valuable addition to Eden
Prairie's housing opportunities as well as effectively using the natural features
of the site.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the concept plan as submitted with special emphasis upon the multiple
unit building type proposed. Approval is solely based upon the terrace style
unit and not any apartment building.
The exact number of units in the project is not specified in the recommendation
since building plans are not complete, but the number proposed, 162 total
units, is the maximum allowable.
DP:kg
PRELIMINARY STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 15, 1972
APPLICANT: McAllister Properties, Inc.
LOCATION: 15 Acres of Land Located South of I-494 and the
Eastern Boundary of Eden Prairie and Bloomington,
north of Anderson Lakes.
REQUEST: Concept Plan Approval of the Planned Unit Development
for 15 acres of Residential
FROM: Dick Putnam, Village Planner
COMMENTS
This project is located along an area that has been identified on the
Village Comprehensive Guide Plan as being industrial and office usage.
Some zoning exists to the west of the site as I-5 Park, and public space
along the lake. On the north of the freeway to the west is also I-5 Park.
Evaluation of the use of this site must take into account the neighboring
uses,both the single family residential in Bloomington at the intersection
of Co.Rd. 18 and I-494 and the industrial as mentioned, and its
relationship to Anderson Lakes Regional Park. The features of the site,
the relationship to the marsh, and the high hill of 70 ft. are major
considerations in the use and site plan proposed. 1-494 as an impact
on this site,both visually, audibly, and psychologically, should be
evaluated with great care. Access to the site will be from the frontage
road, 78th Street, which will have access to the interstate system to the
west at the Major Center and Ring Route Area, but not at Co. Rd. *18 and
I-494 in the future.
Preliminary Staff Planning Report
November 16, 1972
Page 2
Critical to the success of this site is the building type proposed in the 1—
multiple structure. As you are aware, this would be classified as
terraced housing, much the same as was proposed in the Marsh-
Midwest Terminal's terraced hillside unit. Total underground parking,
the court plaza area, and the excellent view of Anderson Lakes are all
extremely positive features of such a unit. It remains to be seen
whether such a unit can economically be built within the Metropolitan
Area within the next few years. Therefore,any concept plan approval
may well have a time limit suggested by the Commission.
Since the relationship of this site to the adjacent single family site
within Bloomington is critical, it would seem appropriate to advise the
neighborhood residents of the proposal and make the staff's time
available for explanation of the project. Of concern, should be the
impact of developing within one municipality and greatly influencing
residents of another municipality. The Commission and Staff concerned
should be directed to this area for public information of this project.
DP:kg
•
•
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION REVIEW
ANDERSON LAKES PUD
•
January 4, 1973
The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the Anderson Lakes PUD for its compatibility with the Open Space System Plan and its effect
• on the environment, particularly the environment of the Anderson
Lakes Park.
While the Commission agreed that the land use seems appropriate,
several members felt that the "big" building was too high for this
location and that it would intrude visually on the nature area across
the lake. The Commission also favored a rustic exterior for the
building rather than the stark white appearance portrayed in the
booklet. Cedar shake siding or something comparable was suggested to
soften the visual impact from the park.
The Commission recommends that the height of the building be lowered
one story, that a rustic exterior be mandatory, and that the land adjacent
to the actual lakeshore be dedicated to a depth of 250 feet. This will
allow for consistent lakeshore management on Anderson Lakes. Also,
the nature of the Anderson Lakes and the nature park makes it imperative
that no swimming or boating occur. Dedication of the lakeshore land
will provide the best mechanism for regulating the uses to which this
area is subjected.
MJ
Ili
. a
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
December 19, 1972
l
velopment
north
re of
A. Anderson Lake Anderson Lake.PUStaff sreport aand rreco mnendationPfrom last omeetin,,.
Mrs. Schee informed the Commission that the Park and Recreation
Commission had reviewed and approved the Anderson Lake PUD concept.
Residents have been informed of the pending development but have
not come forth.
The one year time period would be a schedule where in working
drawings would be completed in nine months and construction in
the following three months.
Action Taken:
Mr. Boerger moved and Mrs. Schee seconded that the Anderson Lake
PUD concept plan be approved:
a. As submitted in the brochure
b. Based solely on the terraced style unit
c. With maximum number of units for this proposal not to
exceed 162 units, y in construction.
d. With adherence to a one ear time limit to begin
lir. Sorensen expanded stipulation c by telling kir. Caretaker and
his associates that the 162 units was not a hard and fast figure.
If it was found that the land would not allow this number of unite,,
a lesser nuciber should be built.
Sorensen, Schee, Boerger, Nesbitt eyed and Posnocht abstained.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
December 5, 1972
{ •
B. Anderson Lake PUD residential development north of Anderson Lakes and
south of 494 near Co. Rd. #1G. 130 units of multiple terraced
housing and 32 townhouse.units on a 15 acre site. Staff report and
recommendation.
fir. Putnam explained his staff planning report. fir. Dick Garmaker,
developer, said a time period of one year would be an adequate time
limit for his project and voiced his conmittment to the plan. he
said corporate offices and perhaps cinemas were being planned for
the proposed commercial area to the west of the proposed project.
far. Fosnocht spoke of the impact of the flood plain area and told
of his concern about the intrusion on the lake. fir. Aslandis felt
that the plantings would surely not eliminate but would prevent
or minimize this intrusion. Shoreview Manor, Edina-Southdale
Highrise, and Chateau Shelard are current projects of flcAllister, Inc.
Action Taken:
Further research was desired by the Commission members so it was
moved by fir. Buerger and seconded by Mr. Brown to hold the item
over for two weeks and place it on the Commission's agenda for
December 19. Boerger, Brown, Fosnocht, Schee ayed. Sorensen
abstained.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
November 21, 1972
B. Anderson Lake :JD, a residential development proposa i or.
north edge of Anderson Lakes and west of Bloomington bou;:d„ry.
Mr. Putnam felt the Staff Report outlined the plan, but felt iilat
the residents in Bloomington abutting this development as propo:.cd
should be contacted so they could attend the nest Commis,ion
meeting. He poir ted out that the adjacent area to the proposed
development is zoned industrial.
Mr. Aslandis save a slide presentation of the area showing topo,
veg'itatlon, water utilities plan, soil conditions, land use and
open space provisions.
Action Taken:
Mrs. bchee told Mr. Aslandis that the proposal would be accepted
for staff report and recommendation, which would be forthcoming
in two weeks.
Before the meeting adjourned, Mr. Pcsnocht asked if any action
had been taken by. the Preserve or Edenvale regarding the storage
of recreational vehicles. He felt a logical solution would be to •
have a definite policy about how the vehicles would be stored in
these two areas. Mr. Putnam was requested to follow up on this.
ii
•
December 22, 1972
Iva'. Yawl iiodpath
iivmbcrs of the Council:
Tine Snowdriftcrs of Bien. ?rairie are interested in
safe tau: rus.donsiulo snow:Jo:i.ling. Han.; our wo,ubers have
taken an active part in preccsntieg Lao 5noxmobilo Safety Train-
1
ing Course to young people of our area every year.
We aro also interested in other areas we could be of
help to the community and would like to offer our manpower
and atachines to the village at any time lie could be of survice.
For example, in tee past we lzuve boon of asaietanco to the
Sheriff's Office in searchir.;; otherwise inaccessible swamps
1
and woods for injured persons and animals.
All of our .webers aro a csidonts of Eden Prairie. A
list of names and telephone r nunbers will be sent to the Public
d c Ly Director of rnemoers wile aro availaulo at any time to hcl,;.
If we can be of as:datance to you or you have any
quus ties ploaso call Ton Darner at 941-1317.
Siincerol,', ) /
W0-L1.Ft� ✓,(74%.ta'
Warren dyers, .1re sic:ant
Snowdrifters, Inc.
cc: Jack :lacking
iicbort Heinrich
�"i1-
PERBIX. HARVEY &SIMONS. P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
P. O. SOX 1e0
17 TENTH AVENUE SOUTH
HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 135343
T[LVHONE 03e-441,11
W.HAALm PMSIX
January 5, 1973 HOWARD E.HAwvSv
KuITM E.SINONS
P . Robert Heinrich, Village Manager
Village of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Dear Bob:
Enclosed please find executed copies of the Agreements with
both Shelter and MAIA Corporations. I assume you might want
to put those on next week's agenda.
Very tru y yours,
W. Harlan Perbix
Attorney for the
Village of Eden Prairie
WHP/a
Enc.
SUBURBAN tH Shady
COMM R REM BOARD
oad
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343
City -- Village Council
Attentioot Clerk
Gentlemen
As you know. the Suburban Hennepin County Relief Board represents
some twenty—two aunioipalities in rural Hennepin County for the
purpose of sdaini-taring direct rend.
Under the law this organisation exists by, virtue of written con-
trots, a copy of which you haw an file in your offices.
Thew contracts must be renewed r luef by the adoption of an
appropriate resolution, two copies of which are nailed to you
herewith. lids resolution should be presented at your next
regular sorting and adopted, whereupon one copy is to be Awed
in your emotes and the other copy properly sued and returned
to this office.
If you have lost or do not have a copy of the contract, this
offioe will be very happy to furnish you another one.
Rill you pleas., take this matter up at your next meeting and
return the resolution to us promptly?
(Oyer!yours,
Joseph C.44I .
ny
Soaratary
M •jjq"�.
TO: ;Mayor and Members of Eden Prairie Village Council
FROM: Village Manager`
— DATE: December 22, 1972 '—
SUBJECT: Employee Compensation Program
Compensation adjustments as recommended reflect my judgement after
reviewing performance, comparable public end private pay rates,
professional development, experience and other factors that I
believe should be considered in establishing compensation levels.
Public Works employees are represented by Local 49 of the International
Union of Operating Engineers. Local 49 this past week settled for a
base salary increase of $37. For most co:rrnunities this represented
an approximate percentage increase of 4,3%_ In addition some adjustments
in fringe benefits may be made. The management negotiating team, of
which I am a member, have urged member municipalities to minimize fringe
benefit adjustments. Eden Prairie was one of those communities that was
represented by the team for contract language negotiations, but not wage
negotiations. Eden Prairie Public Works ennloyees have been historically
compensated at a lower than the annual negotiated rate (1972 Negotiated
Rate $818 - 1972 Eden Prairie Rate $175). I am presently negotiating
with the 49 er's to develop a multi year n lan of compensation adjustment
that will eventually result in parity with other municipalities.
Because of the negotiations presently underway, the resolution setting
salary adjustment for employees does not include adjustments for Public
Works personnel.
As the Public Works personnel are making the transition from rural pay
levels to urban nay levels so it is with many of the other Village
employees, Review of the 1972 Metropolitan Area Salary Survey (copies
of this report were provided to all counci lien about three months ago)
v,ill demonstrate this fact. The recommended pay levels of individual
oyes constitute not only a cost of living adjustment (Mi nneapol i s -
St. Paul cost of living is uo 3,1% for the past 12 months) but a "catch-up"
adjustment as well as merit adjustments. Several employees will he
eligible for merit increases July 1, 1973. Groan A employees are those
employees receiving increases over present compensation levels for which
funds were provided in the Contingency Appropriation. Group B employees
..re 1)72 budgeted positions. Group C anpt oyee is the 1972 budgeted position
of Village Engineer for which an increase of $1,500 from S16,500-$18,000
is requested.
The recommended adjustments for the Engineering Assistant and Foreman
include the nrivi lege of usi ng a vi 1 iage pi ckuo for transportation to
and from work. Taking municipal vehicles home is not an uncommon practice
in the Twin Cities if restricted to a certain class of employees and a
reasonable distance from work.
1
1
- VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE -
VILLAGE MANAGER'S
RECOPMENDED EMPLOYEE SALARY PLAN
Position 1972 Salary Recommended 1973 Salary Percent
Group A Annual 1�onthly PnnualIncrease
Foreman 950 11,400 1,000 12,000 5.3
Bui 1 di ng Inspector 1,025 12,300 1,075-1,125 13,200 7.3
Plumbing Inspector 950 11,400 1,000 1. 12,000 5.3
Park Director 1,050 12,60' 1,150-1,175 13,800 9.5
Assessor 1,125 13,500 1,175-1,225 14,400 6.7
Engineering Assistant 1,100 13,200 1,125-1,150 13,650 3.2
Engineering Technician 700 8,400 750 2. 9,000 7.1
Clerk-Bookkeeper 700 8,400 728 3. 8.736 4.0
Administrative Sec. 700 8,400 749 4. 8.841 5.3
Planner 850 10,200 1,000 12.000 17.7
Finance Director 1.365 16,380 1,450 17,400 6.2
Clerical 400 4.800 420 5,040 5.0
Subtotal A 130,980 140.067 6.9
1
Grout B
Public Safety Officer
One (1) 1,000=1,025' 12,150 -
One (1) 1,D25-1,050 12.300 -
Three (3) 1,050-1,075 12.750 -
Publ i c Safety Director 1,300 15.600 -
Subtotal B 52,800
Group C
Village Engineer 1.375 16,500 1,500 18,000 -
* Effective January 1, 1973
** Merit increase July 1, 1973 (not automatic)
1. If six months probation period ending March 11, 1973 is successfully completed,
a 6% increase is granted.
2. If six months probation period ending March 25, 1973 is successfully completed.
a 6% increase is granted.
3. A three percent (3%) increase was granted in Sentember, 1972.
4. If six month probation period ending April 1, 1973 is successfully completed, a
6% increase is granted.
DATE: January 5, 1973
TO: Mayor and Village Council
FROM: Robert P. Heinrich, Village Manager
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROGRAM
Attached is a copy of the Eden Prairie Job Description. Qualifications.
and Compensation for the position of Community Education Coordinator
as proposed by the Community Education Task Force (you've previously
received a copy of the Task Force's Progress Report).
The State Department of Education has informed us that to maintain our
eligibility for the $5,000 Grant programmed for us, we need to implement
the program immediately (in fact, by January 1, 1973). In light of
this ultimatum,Mr. Walt Richardson, Mr. Marty Jessen and I have a
candidate for this job that we feel is an excellent man for the position.
He has outstanding qualifications
and be good
0,experience in this type of
program. His starting salary would
He would"officially" be on the School District's payroll and be
covered under their "fringe benefit" plan. He would probably be
off iced at the Village Hall.
There presently is $2,500 in the 1973 Park and Recreation Administration
Program Budget for the Community Education Coordinator. Due to the
change in concept as to what the Community Education Program will
entail, the need for increased recreation program supervision will not
be fulfilled as proposed in the original 1973 Budget.
Based on the Task Force's recommendation, it seems appropriate to
establish a separate program budget for Community Education Services.
Therefore the attached budget is proposed for this program. The
Village's share of the program is $5,581.50 with $2,500 of this to
be "in kind" clerical work rather than direct cash outlay. The remaining
$3,081.50 would be paid to the School District and they will disburse it and
stration
be transferred toe $2,500 in the this account pluscanation additioonali$581.50 from et the
contingency reserve.
3
•
COMMUNITY SERVICES RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Page Two
Other Program Related Expenses
P.E.R.A, (4.5%of Salary) $ 486.00
F.I.C.A, (5.85%of Salary) 631.80
Employee Insurance 595.20
$1,713.00
TOTAL COST $16.163
Sources of Revenues
State Grant $5,000
School District 5.581.50
Village 5,581.50
' I
II
.j
CODE
FUND GENERAL
FUNCTION COMMUNITY EDUCATION
AREA ADMINISTRATION
PROGRAM COMMUNITY SERVICES RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Actual Actual Budget First ? Estimate Proposed
1970 1971 1972 1972 1972 1973
$ $ $ $ $ $
1. Personal service
rnmmunity Velunatinn rnnrlinntnr $10.800
Secretary [1/2 time) 2.500
$ 13,300 $ 13.300
2. Contractual Service
Conferences and Schools $ 500
Publications and References 200
Mileage 300
$ 1,000 S 1,000
3. Commodities
Suppliwa 150
$ 150 $ 150
TOTAL 0 1 c, •.
�li:N ?IZniitl !
JOB DESCRIPTION, QUIiLI'ICATIONS, AND COMPENSATION
FOR THE POSITION OF
COMMUNITY EDUCATION COORDINATOR
I. Tob Description:
The Community Education Coordinator will work for the Superintendent of Schools and Village Manager in coordinating human service programs to
efficiently meet community needs.
Specifically the Community Education Coordinator will:
*Survey needs of Eden Prairie citizens in the human services area.
*Based upon needs assessment, design a skeletal program which
meets the needs and is capable of being developed and implemented
by the appropriate sponsoring agency.
*Obtain a commitment from the appropriate sponsoring agency to
develop and implement the program.
*Establish an evaluation framework for all human services programs.
*Work with sponsoring agency to insure program implementation.
Community Education program components are as follows:
*K-12 School Enrichment Programs -A supplemental program to broaden
the range of offerings to include high interest activities not normally
found in the regular curriculum.
*Adult Basic Education - Program of classes for adults, age 16 and
over not presently enrolled in school. The courses include math,
spelling, reading, writing, and English for the foreign born.
*General Equivalency Diploma Preparation Clas ses -A program for
adults, age 19 and older, which prepares the student to take the
General Equivalency Diploma (G.E.D. examination which is offered
by the Federal Government).
*Adult High School Diploma Program - A program of courses designed
to enable adults (age 16 and over who have not been enrolled in
school for a full year previous to entry) to earn a high school diploma.
*General Adult Education - Learning activities/courses are offered in
response to the general interests of the adult community.
Job-Description, Qualifications, and Compensation
Community Education Coordinator
Page 2
*Leisure Education - Skill development programs stressing leisure
habits of life-long value.
*Recreation -Activity programs for citizens of all ages stressing only
the value of the activity and subsequent enjoyment the participant
realizes.
*Public Safety
*Public Health Counselling services for community residents.
*Welfare
*Co-ordination with Other Agencies -Work with the Vocational-
Technical School, Junior College, and Industries to meet special
needs identified in the community.
The Community Education Coordinator will work with program managers
for the School District and Village in developing and implementing detailed
programs to meet community needs. Emphasis is on research, coordination,
and evaluation rather than specific implementation.
II. Job Qualifications;
Bachelor's Degree from an accredited college or university preferred.
Ability in communication and human relations.
Knowledge of Community Education and its implications for the School
District and Village in meeting community needs.
Ability in basic research techniques including needs assessment, data
gathering, interpretation of findings, evaluation methods, etc.
Ability to design skeletal program to achieve Community Education
goals.
Organization ability.
Experience and/or training in education, recreation, community relations,
social work, administration,or related fields desirable.
.. .. .
b Description, Qualifications, and Compensation
Community Education Coordinator
Page 3
III. Compensation:
*Salary -- $9,000-11,000 depending on experience and qualifications. E--
*Auto Allowance
*Group Health
*Two—week paid Vacation
ikY
PERBIX. HARVEY & SIMONS. P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
P. O. SOX ISO
17 TENTH AVENUE SOUTH
HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 8e343
TELSPNONI 035.441111
W.HASL N PERMS
—
January 3, 1973 HowANO E.HARva.
KEITH E.SIMON!
I
Mr. Robert P. Heinrich, Village Manager
Village of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343
Dear Bob:
Last Friday I talked to Marty and he apparently wanted to accept
certain land on behalf of the Village owned by Northern States
Power and which they wanted to give to the Village. It is my
understanding that they recorded the deed last Friday so they
could get it in this past tax year.
I indicated to NSP we would put this matter of acceptance on
the agenda so they would have a record of its acceptance by the
Village. I would appreciate it if you would put that as an
agenda item for the next meeting.
A photocopy of the land involved is attached. I have a copy of
the deed should you want that.
Very tru y yours,
(1' L tit Lt. 7:7A t t4 ,
W. Harlan Parbix
Attorney for the
Village of Eden Prairie
WHP/a
Enc.
cc Marty Jensen
Ala
a •
,:v.n. . A ,.�,.« b.1.)�. 'l\\ 1�1` 116i1M1i, ,qll,. F! w+"'`7,� !!, tlii �� [7
�•µ. `,ir e.:w�1 I C� ii j 1 !i i irl 1i % /'r ' ''[ ;l���u m ^�r l �� '1 �li ij'.
1 Ilryc,� li I rlt .I 1 , :y11,1 ' (:I� " a
p. 4.1( 1 1 , ,It 1 1 :1 ! n 1' : 6 , ..:
j'1 I � 1 ',Ill".� � ��
'fit, t le kI, r ,\ 1 '� .1, 11 Lra:.,:l r 1.1--,i:. -�3..
:::&,, Ak.‘‘,,,,, :::).;,,:...2,114\: 4.11,
i744;:.'
_ .SA,.A� \ i1,,11a t. w• ,p • Ll . .�3 —
1, •,r iy1• ` ' I , r_ `: r n t .'14.4I ,I
•w0•Y�r 1.°,,. ( _ I G / r 1 JfI r+ r
r)j • � � ....,�... 1`n..�� �•�i.1 lOIMA > Ni ��l�i y
.,
�•JI���1 yq, fM:. , c 1� f I `1- , 1 ,-\,•' '1 .,,, si 44 '„...j.,.,, i�1.�•,% ~
r is'� C, ,! �I 1 .• N 1
\r' t A , L ,1 M I r;,,,
, :14.;,,,,.6 ii 4, , L.) \........} 11 , r:i 1, 1, 44, , . \ :11
knew OW 100 ,
•
stia
•
., „A A I .' ti
•
4,, / `-�> r , 3t, . .
�► .
4C", r.. rinl 1 I ..11 1 1 ��'� r � - w 7`�`, f...
c. • 1
::---:
l''""'
� / ,1 - 66
'I ;,� , .�.. ',:\. � / fitI: -.
r:' 7 'N\ J �/
S. ,,,c +] ,r,i ►y l
ISi.0. ., 1 , %, :.1''R,.,1, I .. .• i �
. _ It 1 .r- ,,,
� •,�;',+::.�'il"/ SII -' L._� ,."Y•. / ':..:':i'•�" .li+l-:.riaGliM'..'..._�, ,
DATE: January 3, 1973
TO: Village Council
THRU: Robert P. Heinrich, Village Manager
FROM: John Frane, Finance Director
1
I SUBJECT: WATER METER BIDS'
Bids were opened for various sizes of water meters on December 15, 1972.
This recommendation is for the 5/8" x 3/4" size only, the meter usually
installed in a single family dwelling. A recommendation on larger size
meters will be forthcoming. The bids were as follows:
Bidder: Badger Neptune Rockwell
Rice: $38.50 $39.85 $38.77
Water Products Company, bidding the Rockwell meter,will repair these
meters at no cost to the Village no matter what the cause for a period of
5 years. This additional service would allow the Village to delay the time
when it would be necessary to employ persons to repair water meters.
The convenient location of Water Products Co., in the Village, also allows
us to reduce our meter inventory.
We, therefore, recommend that the 5/8" x 3/4" meters bid be awarded to
Water Products bidding the Rockwell meter.
JF:kg
4
•
VILLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FINANCIAL REPORT
DECENBER 31, 1972
F-
Cash Balances:
General and Special Revenue Funds $ 428,984
Capital Projects (Improvements) (608,740)
Park Acquisition and Development 49,978
Debt Service Funds 956,614
Utility Funds 48,417
As of 12/31/72 $2,092,733
Disposition of Cash:
Certificates of Deposit 1,340,000
Cash in Bank (per book) (10,019)
Savings Account 762,752
$2,092,733
Expenditures presented for approval at the Council Meeting of
January 9, 1973 total $374,574. These expenditures will be
met by the following sources of funds:
Cash in Bank (10,019)
Savings Account 384,593
$ 374,574
JDF
1/4/73
•
• Z-