HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 12/21/1984 EDEN PRAIRIE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
IUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21; 1984 7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BLDG.
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Richard Anderson, George
Bentley, Paul Redpath and George Tangen
CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie; City Attorney Roger
•
Pauly; Finance Director John Frane; Planning
Director Chris Enger; Director of Community Services
Robert Lambert; Director of Public Works Eugene A.
Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael
INVOCATION: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 1984 Page 269
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List Page 277
B. Receive 100 Petition for Tanager Creek Improvements and Authorize Page 279
Preparation of Plans and Specifications, I.C. 52-060 (Resolution
No. 84-33)
C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 15-84, zoning from Rural to Commercial Page 281 •
Regional Service on 3.36 acres for a bank building and adoption
of Resolution No. 84-32, approving Eden Glen 4th Addition subject
to Specific Conditions. Location: northeast quadrant of Singletree
Lane and Glen Lane.
D. Permission to advertise for bids for Staring Lake Park Trail - Page 283
Construction Phase II
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PRAIRIE CENTER BUSINESS PARK by Opus Corporation. Request for Page 284
Planned Unit Development Concept for 17.4 acres for three office/
warehouse buildings. Location: southeast quadrant of West
78th Street and Prairie Center Drive. (Resolution No. 84-34 -
PUD Concept Approval)
B. VERNON HILL ESTATES by Countryside Investments, Inc. Request for Zoning Page 291
District change from Rural to R1-13.5 and preliminary plat of
approximately 16 acres for 29 single family lots. Location:
southeast quadrant of Duck Lake Trail and County Road 14.
(Ordinance No. 16-84 - Zoning, and Resolution No. 84-22 -
Preliminary Plat)
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 12114 - 12409 Page 298
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,February 21, 1964
•
VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
A. Historical & Cultural Commission - Marketing Plan for the Cummins/ Page 299
Grill Homestead
VI I. APPOINTMENTS
A. BOARD OF APPEALS & ADJUSTMENTS - Appointment of 1 representative
to serve a thee year term effective March 1, 1964
B. BUILDING CODE BOARD DF APPEALS - Appointment of 1 representative
to serve a three year term effective March 1, 1964
C. DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - Appointment of 2 representatives to serve
three year terms effective March 1, 1964
D. FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION - Appointment of 1 citizen
representative, I Flying Cloud Businessman, and 1 MAC representative
to serve three year terms effective March 1, 19B4
E. HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION - Appointment of 2 representatives
to serve three year terms effective March 1, 19B4
F. HUMAN RIGHTS & SERVICES COMMISSION - Appointment of 2 representatives
to serve three year terms effective March 1, 19B4
G. PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION - Appointment of
( 2 representatives to serve three year terms effective March 1, 1964
H. PLANNING COMMISSION - Appointment of 2 -representatives to serve three
year terms effective March 1, 1984
I. CHARTER STUDY COMMISSION - Appointment of members to serve on the
Charter Study Commission
J. RILEY PURGATORY CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD - Nomination of Page 305
William Sault and James Cardinal to the Riley Purgatory Creek
Watershed District Board
VIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
B. Report of City Manager
1. Discussion on Snow Removal Policy Page 306
C. Report of City Attorney
D. Report of Director of Community Services
I / 1. Proposed Cash Park Fee Increases Page 309
IX. NEW BUSINESS
X. ADJOURNMENT.
•
UNAPPOVED MINUTES
./ EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 7. 1984 7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, Richard Anderson, Geornc
• Bentley, Paul Redpath and George Tangen
CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City Attorney Roger
Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Planning
Director Chris Enger, Director of Community Ser-
vices Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works
Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen
Michael
INVOCATION: Councilman Paul Redpath
•
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: all members were present
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following item was removed from the Agenda: V. A. Resolution No. 84-26,
relating to the issuance of bonds for Baypoint Manor in the amount of
$7,000,000.00.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Agenda and Other
Items of Business as amended and published, Motion carried unanimously,
II. MINUTES
A. Minutes of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, January 3. 1984
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to approve the Minutes of
the City Council Fleeting held Tuesday. January 3, 1984, as published.
Motion carried unanimously.
B. Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday, January 10, 1984
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Minutes of the
Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday, January 10, 1984, as published.
Motion carried unanimously.
C. Minutes of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, January 17, 1984
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Tangen, to approve the Minutes of
the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, January 17. 1984, as published.
Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes -2- February 7, 1984
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Minnesota State Aid System Route Designation (Resolution No. 84-27)
C. Receive Feasibility Report for Traffic Signal Installation at Shady Oak
Road/Flying Cloud Drive and Set Public Hearing, I,C. 52-057 (Resolution
No. 84-29Y
D. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 55-83 for Zoning District Change from Rural
to R1-13,5 for Hidden Ridge by Ron Krueger and Dick Mackenzie, and approval
of Resolution No. 84-24. approving Development according to Specific Plans.
Location: east of County Road 4 at Duck Lake Trail.
E. Donation from Vikings Bassmaster's Club
F. Request authorization to advertise for bids for play structures at Red
Rock Park and Hinh Trail Estates
G. Final Plat approval for Hidden Ridge (Resolution No. 84-28)
H. Appointment of Assistant Weed Inspector
I. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 2-84 for Zoning District Change from C-Regional
to C-Regional Service for 3.26 acres for an office building for Welsh Con-
struction, and adoption of Resolution No. 84-18, approving Development
girding to Specific Plans. Location: north side of West 78th Street,
east of Prairie Cente► Drive.
J. Resolution Nos. 84-17 and 84-23, authorizing application for Mn/DOT Bike
Tants
K. Resolution No. 84-30, designating depositories for the City of Eden Prairie
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve items A - K on the
Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously,
IV, PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Vacation of excess right-of-way: West 78th Street, east of Prairie Center
Drive (Resolution No. 84-15) - continued from 1/17/84
City Manager Jullie stated it would be premature to vacate this right-of-way
until plans for TH 212 are finalized.
MOTION: Tannen moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing
and to table this item to a date not certain. Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes -3- February 7, 1984
B. Vacation of excess right-of-way: West 78th Street, adjacent to northwest
/ corner of Rosemount property Resolution No. 84-16)
City Manager Jullie explained that the strip of land to be vacated is
excess right-of-way which will not be needed for any future widening of
West 78th Street nor will it be needed for the Prairie Center Drive/TH 5
interchange.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing
and to adopt Resolution No. 84-16, vacating roadway and utility easements
on West 78th Street from approximately 500 feet east of Prairie Center Drive
to approximately 1200 feet east of Prairie Center Drive. Motion carried
unanimously.
C. PRIMETECH by Prime Development and M R Properties. Request for Planned
Unit Development Concept Amendment to the City West Planned Unit Develop-
ment for a twenty (20) acre office and industrial park, Planned Unit Develop-
ment District Review and zoning District change from Rural to Office, with
variances, and I-2, with variances. and Preliminary Plat of six acres for
four buildings to be known as Primetech Park. Location: west of Highway
169/212, northeast of Shady Oak Road. (Ordinance No. 14-84 - PUD District
and Zoning and Resolution No 84-20 - Preliminary Plat.)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Ron Erickson, architect with Korsunsky, Krank, Erickson Architects, Inc.,
addressed the request.
Planning Director Enger said this proposal had been reviewed by the Planning
Commission at its meetings on December 12, 1983, and January 9, 1984. The
Planning Commission voted to recommend approval subject to the Staff Reports
dated December 9, 1983, and January 6, 1984. Enger noted the plan has under-
gone some changes from the time it was first reviewed to this time; he re-
viewed and compared the differences between the original proposal and this
concept proposal -- no industrial use had been contemplated in the original
proposal. •
Director of Community Services Lambert noted the Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission had reviewed this at its January 16, 1984, meeting at
which time it voted to recommend approval subject to the recommendations
included in the Planning Staff Report dated January 6, 1984.
Redpath asked if the maintenance fees on these condominium buildings would
be high and something which should be of concern to the Council. Enger said
the covenants which cover this aspect of the development have been reviewed
and maintenance fees should pose no problem. Director of Public Works Dietz
stated there are a number of single family situations in Eden Prairie which
are under similar covenants and they would be less likely to cover the costs
in the future than a business/industrial use would.
211
•
City Council Minutes -4- February 7, 1984
Bentley asked Enger to elaborate on this proposal versus the PUD which
,! had been before the Council previously. Enger reviewed the original •
ll proposal and pointed out where it differed from this proposal. Tangen
asked for clarification as to the existing zoning in City West. Enaer
said 15 acres along Shady Oak Road have been zoned industrial and noted
that was the proposal on which much work had been done on the architec-
tural characteristics of.the buildings.
Penzel inquired as to whether or not there was adequate space to provide
additional parking should these buildings be converted to another use some-
time in the future. Ender said there was not; should this happen, some
green space would have to be converted into parking.
Penzel asked about the screening to be used. Erickson said there will be
no front or back to the project but he was open to any suggestions which
might enhance the project. Because of how the buildings would be situated,
no screening, as usually thought of, was planned. Penzel said he was most
concerned with the visual impact from TH 169.
Chuck Tuchfarber, Prime Development, said 25% of the first phase, or 6
acres, is under contract and another 50% is in the negotiation stage.
Tangen asked about the grading restrictions and asked if there would be
restrictions with each phase. Erickson said they are trying to coordinate
grading for all phases so the whole site could be balanced. This would -_
save time and money. Tangen said that gave him some real problems due
• to the high visibility of the hill and the fact that this might be done
and then nothing would be built for a long period of time. Erickson said
they are not talking about slicing down the hill. Penzel said a solution
might be to allow no grading on the site unless approved by the Planning
Commission and the City Council. Staff will review this further.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing
and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 14.84. Motion carried with Tangen
voting "no."
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No. 84-20,
approving the preliminary plat of Primetech Office Park for Prime Development
and M R Properties. Motion carried with Tangen voting "no."
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to direct Staff to prepare a
Developer's Agreement per Commission and Staff recommendations and with
the provision that the grading question is reviewed by Staff prior to
second reading.
Z'12-
City Council Minutes February 7, 1984
Tangen said he is concerned with the grading on the site and stated he
did not feel the questions regarding the grading were adequately answered.
He said he also has a problem with the amount of industrial use which is
being requested.
Anderson said he would request Staff to complete a tree inventory before
any grading permits are issued.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously.
D. EDEN GLEN 4TH ADDITION by Undestad Investments. Request for Zoning from
Rural to Commercial Regional Service on 3.36 acres for a bank building
and preliminary plat of 4.99 acres into two lots. Location: northeast
quadrant of Singletree Lane and Glen Lane, (Ordinance No. 15.84 - zoning
from Rural to C-Regional Service and Resolution No. 84-21 - preliminary
plat)
City Manager Jullie said notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Reynold Roberts, architect representing the proponent. addressed the
request. Also present was Robert Cashan, Undestad Investments.
Planning Director Enger stated this request had been reviewed by the
• Planning Commission at its January 9, 1984, meeting at which time the
Commission voted to recommend approval subject to the recommendations
included in the January 6, 1984. Staff Report.
This request was not reviewed by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
Commission.
Penzel asked if the sidewalks will connect with other uses in the area,
Enger said they will, Penzel inquired about the signage on the TH 169 side
of the building. Enger said the original design framework for this area
proposed no signage on the TH 169 side,
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing
and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 15-84, Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to adopt Resolution No. 84-21,
approving the preliminary plat of Eden Glen 4th Addition for Undestad In-
vestment. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to direct Staff to prepare a
Summary Resolution of Approval per the Commission and Staff recommendations.
Motion carried unanimously.
(
73
•
City Council Minutes -6. February 7, 1984
V. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 84-26 relating to the issuance of bonds for Baypoint
M anorinn the anount o I7,000.000.00
This item was removed from the Agenda.
VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 11775 - 12113
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Payment of Claims
Nos. 11775 - 12113. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Redpath, Tangen and
Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
There were no reports.
VIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
Redpath - Reported to the Council on a recent meeting of the Area G of
The Preserve Committee at which time a compromise was reached regarding
access and signage for uses which want to go into the area between Regional
Center Road and Middleset Road. Planning Director Enger reviewed the I
•
plans for the proposed uses on the site, Bentley commended Redpath and `-
( Enger for their work on this proposal.
Redpath - Stated the Eden Prairie Foundation had received a request from
the Public Safety Department asking for money to complete the interior
television system in the new facility. Redpath said he felt since other
community organizations were most willing to contribute money for this,
the City Council should be able to find the funds to complete the project.
Director of Public Safety Hacking said about $4,000 more is needed.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to authorize Staff to work
out the funding for completing the interior television system in the new
Public Safety Building. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Redpath,
Tangen and Penzel voted "aye," Motion carried unanimously.
B. Report of City Manager
1. Request for Staffing in Public Safety Department
City Manager Jullie referred to his memorandum of January 20, 1984,
regarding staffing needs for the Public Safety Department: there is
a need for an additional patrol officer to replace an officer who
will he assigned to the investigation unit. Jullie reviewed the
workload of the investigation unit,
City Council Minutes -7- February 7, 1984
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to authorize the
,/ addition of one Public Safety Officer as of April 1, 1984, at a
ll cost of $23,500 for 1984.
Bentley requested that Director of Public Safety Hacking prepare
a forecast of needs for his department prior to the time when the Council
discusses the budget.for next year. He asked where the money
would come from to cover the $23,500, Jullie said it would come
from the City's reserve.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Redpath,
Tangen and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
B. Approval of Eden Prairie Fire Department's Policies and Procedures
• MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Fire
Department's Policies and Procedures manual,
City Manager Jullie noted there were some chanties which had been
recommended by City Attorney Pauly. Pauly noted in Section 8,regard-
ing disciplinary actionsa change should be made so two suspensions
would not have to be gone through in the section regarding amendments
to the Policy Manual, the City Council should be able to make the
final recommendations,
The motion was amended to include the changes as noted by Pauly.
There was discussion on due process. Pauly said this is not civil
service and is not subject to the kind of requirements that requires.
The concensus was that some wording should be included regarding due
process. The issue of attendance was addressed. There was discussion
on the fact that there was no non-discrimination clause included; the
City has no choice but to follow the Federal guidelines.
The motion was amended to include a reference to due process and
a non-discrimination clause.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: The motion, as amended, carried unanimously.
C. Reoort of City Attorney
There was no report.
D. Report of Director of Community Services
•
1. Request approval to enter into a limited use permit agreement with
the State of Minnesota for trail connection from Topview via the
T-494 right-of way
Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to his memorandum of
January I1, 1984, in which this trail connection was addressed,
21 J-
City Council Minutes -8- February 7, 1984
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to instruct Staff
to enter into an agreement with Mn/DOT for a limited use permit
for a trail within the right-of-way from Topview north along I-494.
Motion carried unanimously. i}
IX. NEW BUSINESS }J
City Manager Jullie announced the appointment of Steve Sinell to the position
of City Assessor. City Assessor Bob Martz will retire on February 29, 1984.
Penzel called attention to Resolution No. 84-31 supporting April as Selective
Service Awareness Month.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to adopt Resolution No. B4-31.
declaring April 19B4 as Selective Service Registration Awareness Month.
Motion carried unanimously.
X. AOJOURNMENT
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen; to adjourn the meeting at 9:53 p.m.
Motion carried unanimously.
•
1 lU
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
February 21, 1984
•
CONTRACTOR (MULTI_FAMILY & COMM.) GAS FITTER (continued
And Services Controlled Air
Ory Bakke Insulation Del Air Conditioning, Inc.
Custom Systems, Inc. Northeast Sheet Metal
F & D Properties Steins, Inc.
Leibfrid Construction, Inc. Standard Heating & Air Conditioning
M. A. Mortenson Co. Wenzel Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Northwest Properties Corporation
S. J. Schneider Construction HEATING & VENTILATING •
Dale G. Svennes Const.
Undestad-Brueggman Contractors Advanced Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.
Earl Weikle & Sons, Inc. Aldo, Inc.
W. J. White Company Associated Mechanical
Zachman Homes, Inc. Boulevard Sheet Metal & Heating •
Burke Heating Service, Inc.
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FA_M_ILY) Centraire, Inc.
——— — Climate Engineering Company
Adaptable Housing. Inc. Commercial Air Conditioning
Aspen Realty, Inc. Controlled Air
Best Decks Del Air Conditioning, Inc.
Christy Construction Metro Air
Crest Investment Corp. Northeast Sheet Metal
Donald J. Kaster Steins, Inc. i
Scott Larson Homes Standard Heating & Air Conditioning
New Concept Homes Wenzel Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Novak-Fleck, Inc.
Patterson Masonary Construction PL_U_M_B_I_N_G_
Rum River Construction
Orrin Thompson Homes Associated Mechanical Contractors
TLE Construction Bardwell Plumbing
Robert Waade & Associates, Inc. Carlson Plumbing •
Woodlynn Homes, Inc. Custom Plumbing, Inc.
Dependable Well Co.
GAS FITTER Hoff Plumbing, Inc.
— June Plumbing & Heating
Advanced Heating & Air Cond. Ivan C. Lanars
Associated Mechanical Cont. Larson Plumbing, Inc.
Burke Heating Service, Inc. Mac Donald Plumbing
Centraire, Inc. Nickelson Plumbing, Inc.
Climate Engineering Co. N. S. Services
Commercial Air Conditioning North St. Paul Plumbing & Heating
Nova Frost, Inc.
Solberg Plumbing
Stant Plumbing
Steins, Inc.
Wenzel Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
•
.z 7
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
Page two
WATER SOFTENER •
Commers Soft Water
Twin City Lindsey
VENDING
Dircon Enterprises
TYPE C FOOD
Mark's Eden Prairie Standard
CIGARETTES
Mark's Eden Prairie Standard
THEATRE
Movies At Eden Prairie Center
(United Artists)
MECHANICAL GAMES
Electronic Entertainment
Phil 's Amusement
REFUSE COLLECTOR
Browning Ferris Industries
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible
for the 'cer.sed activity.
Pat Solie, Licensing
9 1T
February 21, 1984
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
I
RESOLUTION NO. R84-33
I
RESOLUTION RECEIVING 100% PETITION,
ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS & PREPARATION
• OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN TANAGER CREEK
. I.C. 52-060
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council:
1. The owners of 100% of the real property abutting upon and
to be benefitted from the proposed sanitary sewer, water main,
storm sewer, street paving, and bikeway,
have petitioned the City Council to construct said improvements
and to assess the entire cost against their property.
2. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, and upon recommendation
of the City Engineer, said improvements are hereby ordered
• and the City Engineer shall prepare plans and specifications
for said improvements in accordance with City standards and
advertise for bids thereon.
3. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the City Clerk is hereby
directed to publish a copy of this resolution once in the
official newspaper, and further a contract for construction
of said improvements shall not be approved by the City Council
prior to 30 days following publication of this resolution
in the City's official newspaper.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on February 21, 1984.
•
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Crane, Clerk
2'19
CITY OF I.LEN ;'r:AIHIE, N.I';hESOTA
l )OOt F£TITIOIN FOR LOC1L )'IF KOVEMENTS
TO TiiE FUEN ;';R.41RI£ CITY COUNCIL:
The undersigned are all the fee owners.of the real property described
below and herein petition for the Eden Prairie City Council to proceed
with raking the following described irp:ov._o,cnts:
(General I.ocat ion)
x Sanitary Sewer _ Edenvale Blvd. & ianager_Lane____..__
xWater ilia in ..------- ---'-----• ---'--------'---
x Stuirn Se.:er
x Street Paving -----—
I
x Other (Bikeway) ._ _ ____- .
Purci;ant to PS.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the undersigned he-rc-by waive any
pebl is hearing t o be held on said iriprovcn.ents, nrid fur tier state and
i rewr.e that the total cost of said i3c1,1ovc-r.en1s shall he s ::cially as-
ced against the )property d.sc:ihed balcw in acco!'d.a•nce with the
City's _ .rcial e•.s-....nt policies. We Cu.,ti--er ur, sand that the
prelimi-rary, Usti:yted total cost for the -.id ii:p*!u.".-.iarets is $370,000 _
Street ;cidr ens or other Legal Nar.es and addldd:c 5,es of Pet it ic ,;Is
r crcotion of Fro;>rty-to be Se:ved �(' Est Ye ow•r.e)s of record) _
Tanager Creek- _ Richaid'Neslund
-- - - - MaLeth Neslund-.
Cheyenne Land Co.
(. • / /
•
- - - •._'. _ by: Richard Neslund,.Partner ;
r
-
(accompanied by title opinion)
(For City Use-) _
�rt
rate Fe.ceivrd 1-23"O.!. . _ --- -.- _- -
.. e:O. SG-G ,c,
2Knr°
V
.._.i r, .,., r.i.,;ion 2-2i-f'4/- -
is
• Eden Glen 4th
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
./ HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
l ORDINANCE NO. 15-84
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof. f
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be •
removed from the Rural District and be placed in the C-Reg-Ser District.
Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be,
and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
C-Reg-Ser District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to
in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are
amended accordingly.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
( Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 7th day of February, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of
ATTEST:
ohn D. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of _
zFl
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 84-32
A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
OF APPROVAL
FOR EDEN GLEN 4TH ADDITION BY UNDESTAD INVESTMENTS
FOR AN OFFICE BUILDING ON 3.36 ACRES
BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal for a three-story office building on 3.36 acres for
Undestad Investments, located at the northeast quadrant of Singletree Lane and Glen
Lane, is herein approved subject to the following specific conditions:
1. The site plan and grading plan, dated December 9, 20, and 22, 1983, and
attached hereto shall apply.
•
2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, developer/owner shall:
A. Revise the utility plan to include two additional catch basins along
Glen Lane in the north and center driveway entrances.
B. Revise the site plan to include a five-foot wide sidewalk along Glen
Lane and Singletree Lane.
C. Submit rooftop mechanical equipment screening information to the
Planning Department for review and receive approval thereof.
D. Submit color samples of the exterior brick, windows, and trim to the
Planning Department for review and receive approval thereof.
E. Submit signage information denoting type, size, height, and
locations of signage to the Planning Department review and receive
approval thereof.
F. Receive Watershed District approval.
G. Submit ten-year storm sewer design calculations to the City Engineer
for review and receive approval thereof.
H. Submit a landscape plan, bond, and contract to the Planning
Department for review and receive approval thereof.
I. Pay the Cash Park Fee.
ADOPTED by the City Council on , 1983.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frene, City Clerk
272
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Servicese
FROM: Stephen Calhoon, Park ' 'nn \( ,A�w i
• DATE: February 14, 1984 YYY W��.vvv
SUBJECT: Staring Lake Park Trail- Construction Phase II
Staff requests permission to publicly advertise and receive bids for construction
of Phase II of the hard-surfaced trail at Staring Lake Park. Phase II would basically
connect the developed area on the southwest edge of the park to the Eden Prairie
Senior Center. Construction of this 8300.0' segment of the trail is estimated to
cost $45,000.
Bids would be received March 15, 1984 and presented to the CityCouncil March 20th.
Typically, projects bid early in the construction season are bid by contractors in a
very competitive manner. Construction is anticipated to begin June 15 or earlier
depending upon spring conditions, and could be completed August 15, 1984. Funds
for this project are derived from cash park fees.
SC:md •
•
•
z a3
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 84-34
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRAIRIE CENTER BUSINESS PARK
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT FOR OPUS CORPORATION 1 .
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for
the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located within the City; and,
WHEREAS, Opus Corporation has applied for a Planned Unit Development Concept
approval for Prairie Center Business Park, located at the southeast quadrant of West
78th Street and Prairie Center Drive; and,
•
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the
request of Opus Corporation for PUD Concept approval and recommended approval of the I
PUD Concept to the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on February 21, 1984;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Prairie Center Business Park PUD Concept, being in Hennepin
County, Minnesota, and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A,
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval to the Prairie
Center Business Park as outlined in the application materials for
the Prairie Center Business Park, dated December 20, 1983.
3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning
Commission dated January 23, 1984.
ADOPTEO by the City Council of Eden Prairie this day of
, 1964.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL
i
Planning Commission Minutes 5 January 23, 1984
C. PRAIRIE__ CENTER BUSINESS PARK, by Opus Corporation. Request
for Planned Unit Development Concept review for 17.4 acres
for three office/warehouse buildings. Location: Southeast
quadrant of West 78th Street and Prairie Center Drive. A
public hearing.
Ms. Michelle Foster, Opus Corporation, reviewed the request for
development with the Commission. She stated that, while Opus
realized that the area should be a "transitional" development
between the industrial use to the east and the Purgatory Creek
recreational area to the west, the idea of maintaining the uses as
strictly office, as opposed to a mix of office and industrial, was
not an option for Opus. She suggested changes to the development
framework as proposed by the Staff Report and submitted a copy of
the proposed changes to the Commission.
Planner Enger reviewed the recommendations of the Staff report
evaluating the project. He stated that, compared to the development
framework suggested by the Staff in the Staff Report, the proposed
framework by Opus did nothing more for this area than the basic
requirements of the I-2 Park district of the City Code. Planner
Enoe'r stated that *his area needed to be dealt with as a transition
are,. and that .he m.et importas factor involved the proper
development.of this parcel would be the character of the product as
an office development.
Planner Enger pointed out that the examples of buildings offered by j
Opus to the Staff and Conunission would meet the criteria suggested
• by the Staff Report, and, therefore, would be appropriate for use as
a development framework for this transitional area.
Schuck questioned why Opus would not commit to the development 1
framework suggested by the Staff, even though it was their intent,
by the examples given, to build within such a framework. Ms. Foster
stated t.:1:1t she understood the criteria to be required, not
suggested, by the Staff.
Hallett stated that he agreed with Schuck, and stated that he felt
this location was a key to the development of this entire area. As
a cornerstone within the City to the Major Center Area, he stated
that he felt the image of the site should be high and should take
advantage of the future recreation area to the west.
Mr. Mark Anderson, Real Estate Division of Opus, stated that they
would like to maintain flexibility within the development as there
were no known clients for the property at this time.
Mr. Johathan Miller, architect for the proponent, stated that he dia
not feel there was that much difference between the intent of the
Opus proposed development framework and the Staff Report recom ended
development framework. He felt that Opus could work with Staff to
mitigate any differences.
Mr. John Lumen, representing Feeders, Inc., owners of the property,
2 L5
Planning Commission Minutes 6 January 23, 1984
stated that they had operated on the basis that the site was
industrial. He stated that they were concerned about the type of
product built on this property, too, as Feeders was also the owner
of the property to the west.
Marhula stated that he felt the site plan shown by the developer was
not appropriate according to the statements that had been made at
the meeting.
Ms. Foster stated that as long as the items within the Staff Report
were considered suggestions, or guidelines, instead of rigid
critera, then Opus would have no difficulty in working within such � .
guidelines.
Acting Chairman Gartner asked for questions and comments from
members of the audience. There were none.
MOTION 1: ;..
Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Johannes, to close the
public hearing.
Motiog carrieu--5-6-U
MOTION 2:
•
Motion was made by Hallett, .seconded by Johannes, to recommend to
the City Council approval of the Planned Unit Oevelopment Concept
for Opus Corporation fur the Prairie Center Business Park, based on
plans and written materials dated Oecember 20, 1983, photographic
representations submitted to the Planning Commission on January 23,
1984, and subject to the suggested guidelines of the Staff Report
dated January 20, 1984.
Motion carried--5-0-0
•
•
Z66
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Chris •Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: January 20, 1984
PROJECT: Prairie Center Business Park
LOCATION: Southeast quadrant of Prairie Center Drive and W. 78th Street,
• immediately west of Rosemount Engineering
APPLICANT: Opus Corporation
FEE OWNER: Feeders, Inc.
REQUEST: Planned Unit Development Concept for Industrial and Office Uses on
approximately 18 acres
Background
The purpose of the designation in the Comprehensive Guide Plan.of industrial in this
portion of the Major Center Area (when industrial is not shown in any other area of
the Major Center Area) is reflective of Rosemount Engineering being a pre-existing
use. Since the Guide Plan is a very general graphic representation, interpretation,
using established City land use policies, is required in some instances. When
applying these policies regarding adjacent land uses, compatibility between land
uses, and land uses as transitional uses, we find that the Feeders, Inc., piece east
of Prairie Center Drive is a transitional use from the Rosemount industrial use to
other uses to occur to the west and south.
Since the City has embarked upon a plan for improvement of the major flood plain
area lying to the southwest of this property, land uses surrounding this major flood
plain anenity become very critical as to how they integrate with each other and with
the open space use. Because of this parcel's proximity to Rosemount on the east and
the flood plain on the southwest, it is a keystone at the entrance of what could be
the City's major downtown central park area. It is, therefore, critical that the
highest and best use be placed on this parcel.
Examples of land uses which would represent the highest utilization of the site's
total potential would be a single corporate multiple-story office building, several
smaller multiple-story office buildings, a major hotel and restaurant complex, mid-
or high-rise high density residential, sports and health club complex, etc. All of
these uses could take major advantage of the southwest orientation of the site and
its principal view over the major open space area adjacent to it.
Previous_Request
The 1979 request by Feeders, Inc., for rezoing of this parcel to I-5 and I-2 park
was recornnanded for denial by the Planning Commission because grading for the entire
2-71
•
Prairie Center Business Park 2 January 20, 1984
site was requested concurrent with development of the first lot. Also, the building
proposed was a 110,000 sq. ft. warehouse building with a dozen loading docks facing
southwest. The Planning Commission felt that this was not the highest and best use
of the land, it would have a negative impact on the surrounding land use, and
grading of the entire site was premature.
Current Request
Opus Corporation is looking for confirmation from the City that the site can be used
as industrial. The Staff has discussed with the proponent the transitional and
sensitive nature of the site, and Opus Corporation has voiced a concern to preserve
maximum flexibility for use of the site. Since the request from Opus is not
predicated upon any specific client at this time, the request is more of a proto-
typical client, which they feel may be interested in this type of site. Therefore,
it is not known at this point whether there would be one; two, or three buildings on
the site, but the request is made to define a general conceptual approach.
The Planning Staff feels that the request as proposed by Opus would not match the
ultimate goal of utilizing the site as a keystone to this quadrant of the Major
Center Area and a transitional land use.
Site Character
Even though much of the site has been graded to provide fill for the road
construction occurring in the area, the overriding orientation of the site is to the
southwest. The major land form along the northern boundary of the site internalizes
the site and focuses its views to the southwest, while protecting it from the
elements from the north. This land form should be recognized in any future plan as
providing screening for any warehouse function. These features of the site make it
a prime candidate for earth-sheltering and solar access.
Preservation of the southern wooded hill is, however, key to the success of the
final plan.
Site Plan
The Opus plan does not take maximum advantage of the southwest facing hill, or the
southwest orientation. Because of the total warehouse roof height of approximately
18 ft., and the fact that the 50% office floor area is accommodated in a two-story
portion of the structure, the warehouse portion of all three buildings dominates the
mass of the building. The use of office primarily on the south and west sides of
the buildings is not consistent on all three buildings. The building on Parcel C
(the southern building) is the only building, which primarily places the office
portion of the building facing dominantly west.
Revisions to Opus Concept
- 9
How can the Opus Corporation request be modified in concept to be acceptable as a
keystone and transition use in this area of the Major Center? The site could be
converted to 100% office land use and be either individual buildings or one large
corporate office use.
An alternative to building a 100% office project would be to build the project with
a mix of office and research and development functions to office standards. Since
277
Prairie Center Business Park 3 January 20, 1984
the highest and.best use of the land is most likely office in the long term, if the
buildings were built like office buildings, the amount of office could steadily
increase. Building to office standards could be accomplished through the use of a
combination of the following factors:
1. Exterior materials of the buildings should be brick or equal as
required by the City.
2. Any truck docks and bays necessary for the operation of the
buildings should be oriented toward the northeast corner of the site
and completely enclosed within the building. The enclosure would
also include the bay areas so trucks would actually drive inside the
building. As individual clients are identified for construction of
the buildings, then it should have clients with the type of use
which would allow custom design of the building to fit office
standards.
3. The use of multiple story buildings above and beyond the two-story
buildings proposed would not only allow more of the building to gain
views of the major flood plain area, but would decrease the building
foot print and, thereby reduce large roof areas, which would
normally typify an industrial use, and which would be viewed by
other surrounding land uses of multiple stories.
4. Buildings on Parcels B and C are most visible from differing land
uses to the south and west and should be built to appear as office
structures, either by enveloping the warehouse use with actual
office space on the south and west sides, or constructing the
warehouse portion of the building identically to an office building.
An example of this would be the CPT corporate headquarters on Scenic
Heights Drive and Mitchell Road. When the building was first
proposed by CPT, it was approximately 130,000 sq. ft., 75% of which
was for research and development. After the first phase, CPT
enlarged the building by over 100%, and the amount of office space
increased to 75% of the total building area. All of this occurred
without changing the outside appearance of the building, which
appears very much office in nature.
• 5. Another alternative for designing the project to appear office in
character on the south and west sides would be to limit any story
height above grade to an apparent twelve foot dimension floor-to-
floor. This is a typical office story height and would be
consistent with the office character of the buildings.
6. Opus is proposing that the amount of office in the project total
would not be less than 50%. Planning Staff is in agreement with
this, and, if flexibility is necessary for individual buildings to
be above this percentage, the appropriate way to distribute the
industrial would be to place the highest percentage of industrial in
the northeastern building on Parcel A. An example would be to make
the building on Parcel A 75% manufacturing or warehousing and border
it on the southwest with Parcels B and C, which could contain no
more than 25% warehousing or manufacturing.
•
Prairie Center Business Park 4 January 20, 1984
.{ Parcel A provides an additional opportunity for decreasing the
amount of building footprint and increasing the height by stacking
the two-story office element on top of the two-story manufacturing
element. Another approach to this building would be to place one
story of the office element on top of the two-story manufacturing
area and envelope the south and west faces of the resultant three-
story building with the balance of the floor area contained in the
original two-story office area.
7. The window area on the south and west faces of the buildings should
be at least 25% of the those elevations.
B. Underground, or deck, parking should be utilized to increase green
area on the site.
•
9. Since warehousing or assembly functions are requested as part of the
office building approach, this function offers an ideal opportunity
for earth-sheltering that portion of the building, while utilizing
the office portion of the building for solar access.
The overriding concept of this Planned Unit Development should be to utilize this
parcel as a transition between the industrial use to the east and the high quality
open space park image to the south and west. Since the clients and exact building
program have not been defined, any future specific plans should be done utilizing
some, or all, of the elements mentioned above to assure that the image of the
resultant project is that of an office park, and that the buildings be designed in
such a way that the ultimate highest and best use of the land would be realized as
office space.
RECOMMENDATIONS: •
•
The Planning Commission may wish to consider one of the following alternatives:
Alternative #1
The Planned Unit Development Concept could be approved as modified by the
recommendations in this report, and subject to the following:
Since no clients have been identified at this time, and since the overall site plan
will need to be modified according to the design parameters listed in this report,
no further grading should be done on the site until specific plans for actual use
are submitted for review and approval.
Alternative #2
Return the project to the developer for redesign in conformance with the guidelines
identified in this report, and to return to the Planning Commission for additional
review.
•
290
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #84-22
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT•OF VERNON HILL ESTATES
FOR COUNTRYSIDE INVESTMENTS, INC.
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Vernon Hill Estates for Countryside Investments, Inc.,
dated January 6, 1984, consisting of 16 acres for 29 single family residential lots,
a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the
provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments
thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the _ day of
, 1984.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frdne, City Clerk
291
NOTE: NAME HAS BEEN CHANGED TO VERNON HILL ESTATES
D. KNOBHILL_, by Countryside Investments, Inc. Request for
Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 and Preliminary
Plat of approximately 16 acres for 3D single family lots.
Location: Southeast quadrant of Duck Lake Trail and County
Road #4. A public hearing.
Mr. Ron Krueger, representing proponent, reviewed the requested
actions with the Commission. He pointed out significant site
features and design characteristics of the plan.
Staff reviewed the recommendations of the Staff Report evaluating
the request.
Mare a
yard
duehuto askedthe unusual6shapedofegtherlot. variance
responded front
if Lot that this
would be checked.
Acting Chairman Gartner asked for questions and conments from
•
•
2g2
•
•
Planning Commission Minutes
January 23, 1984
• members of the audience. There were none.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made 'by Marhula, seconded by Johannes, to close the
public hearing.
Motion carried--5-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Marhula, seconded by Johannes, to recommend to
the City Council approval of the request of Countryside Investment,
Inc., for zoning district change from Rural to R1-13.5, based on
plans dated January 6, 1984, and subject to the recommendations of
the Staff Report dated January 20, 1984.
Motion carried--5-0-0 •
MOTION 3:
Motion was made •b" Marhula, seconded by Johannes, to recommend to
the „ity Cou.rcil ,ppro%11- of the r ,uest of Countrysit,- Invest.,ent,
Inc., for preliminary plat of approximately 16 acres into 29 single
family lots, based on s
ubject
the recommendations of the dated January
heStaffReportdated Januaryand 20,s1984. to
Motion carried--5-0-0 •
•
•
•
2143
STAFF REPORT
(
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Stephen Sullivan, Assistant Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
OATE: January 20, 1984
PROJECT: Vernon Hill Estates
LOCATION: East of County Road #4 and South of Duck Lake Trail
APPLICANT: Countryside Investments, Inc.
FEE OWNERS: Oon and Vern Olson
Nina Seery
REQUESTS: 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5
2. Preliminary Plat of 16 acres for 29 residential lots
Background
The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates the parcel as Low Density Residential. The
current zoning is Rural.
Existing Site Character
The parcel is bordered to the south by the C. M. & St. Paul Railroad, with Ouck Lake
Estates and a church to the west. Purgatory Creek and flood plain area lie to the
northeast. The proposed Hidden Ridge development is located north of the property.
(See Figure #1)
The character of the site can be typified as a wooded knoll with steep slopes to the
south and east. These steep slopes fall into the parameters for Steep Slopes within
the City Code. The knoll area is located in the east-central portion of the parcel
and has a high point of elevation 960. The eastern ridge has a 30-45% slope to a
low point of 850 at Purgatory Creek. The southern ridge has 15-25% slopes with a
low point of 910 within the adjacent railroad property.
Site drainage is to the east, west, and south. All on-site storm water eventually
outlets to Purgatory Creek.
The Purgatory Creek Conservancy Area lies between contours 860 and 870 within Lots
14 and 15. No land alteration will be permitted within this area. Staff evaluation
concludes that, due to the large size, steep slopes, and vertical drop of Lots 14
and 15, no negative impacts would occur to the shoreland of Purgatory Creek with the
placement of a 150 ft. wide scenic easement along the easterly boundary of these
1
Vernon Hill Staft Report 2 January 20, 1984
lots. This would coincide with the scenic easement established within the Hidden
Ridge development. (See Figure #1)
Oak, maple, poplar, ash, willow, and elm cover approximately 50% of the site. The
remainder of the parcel is in meadow grasses and scattered saplings. The proposed
grading of the road preserves approximately 95% of these trees. The proponent has
provided a tree inventory of the significant trees lost with this development.
Approximately 15 significant trees with a twelve-inch or greater diameter will be
lost. Additional trees will be removed with the grading of individual building
pads.
The soils are conducive for residential development.
Three existing homes will remain with the develoment of the parcel. These homes
have been incorporated into the plat.
Ordinance Requirements
All lots meet or exceed the requirements for minimum lot size, lot width, and lot
depth. The building pad locations are not located on the site plan. The lots are
large enough to accommodate homes with the required front, side, and rear yard
setbacks.
The lots range from 13,500 sq. ft. to 56,000 sq. ft. The average lot size is 21,935
sq. ft. The gross density is 1.6 units per acre.
The property is owned by two separate parties. An effort was made to plat the
property providing that no lots would be a composite of both properties. As a
result, Outlots A and B were to be deeded to Lots 12 and 13 at the time of purchase.
Staff feels that this flexible arrangement offers an opportunity for the adjacent
parcels owners not to buy the outlots, which could leave vacant outlots and
substandard lots.
Site Plan
Access to the parcel is off County Road #4 across from Baywood Lane. The volume of
traffic generated by the project can be handled by the adjacent roads.
The development plan indicates a 1,200 ft. cul-de-sac exceeding the 500 ft. maximum
specified by City Code. Staff evaluated the development potential of the property
at the time of the Hidden Ridge proposal. The results indicated that a long cul-de-
sac, or several cul-de-sacs, required in order to limit the number of accesses to
County Road #4.
The grading plan indicates a minimum amount of grading to occur with the road right-
of-way. A maximum road grade of 5% is proposed. A majority of the grading is east
of County Road r4, providing an area for building pads for Lots 23-29. The slopes
adjacent to the road range from 1-25%. The City policy for driveway slopes is a
12% maximum. The developer should provide the City with a development plan which
illustrates the impact on the wooded areas of grading lots to conform with a 12%
maximum grade from the right-of-way.
Water service ties to an existing main located off County Road #4. Sanitary sewer
is located within the right-of-way. It then runs within a 20 ft. wide utility
•
Vernon Hill Staff Report 3 January 20, 1984
( easement between Lots 2 and 3 to an existing main on the adjacent railroad property.
The site plan indicates two separate storm water systems. The northern system
outlets to the County Road #4 ditch, running along the railroad property, and then
to Purgatory Creek. The southern system outlets to an existing ponding area
adjacent to the railroad property and then to Purgatory Creek. The north system
should be tied to the south system, thus eliminating the north outlet.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval for the zoning district change from Rural to R1-13.5 and
Preliminary Plat of 29 residential lots, subject to the following:
1. Prior to City Council review, proponent shall.:
A. Provide a development plan for evaluation of hte impact of slopes no
greater than 12% from the right-of-way line into all adjacent lots
for a distance of 30 ft.
B. Revise the tree inventory to reflect the additional grading required
according to recommendations of lA above.
C. Submit a grading limit plan, which designates fencing to be placed
along the areas where significant plant material is to be saved.
D. Submit an erosion control plan.
E. Revise the storm water layout, tying the north system to the south
system, thus eliminating the north outlet.
F. Revise the preliminary plat, deleting Dutlots A and B, placing the
land area within Lots 12 and 13.
2. Prior to final plat, the proponent shall:
A. Submit to the Planning Department appropriate documentation for the
scenic easement within the easterly 150 ft. of Lots 14 and 15.
B. Receive approval from Hennepin County for access to County Road r4.
The final plat shall reflect any revisions or additions of turn
• lanes and/or acceleration lanes as required by the County.
C. Dedicate a 50 ft. right-of-way along County Road #4 to Hennepin
County.
D. Depict on the plat a 20 ft. wide utility easement between Lots 2 and
3.
E. Receive Watershed District approval.
3. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Receive a utility permit from Hennepin County for work within the
right-of-way.
B. Pay the required Cash Park Fees.
2.9(c
i
•
AL1CaNLJ�t✓P-31 \ �\ '
( 11MBe_R CRMK. `\ -
. .,• ,1 .__. ,o EJ1S1=..-LE.IJZ
I `- vAoREL•AVD
•
-- ' Y
�/��� flJ 'F1' t 1
r . 4
-.... "'?
ft—
ft � \�\ 1t R7t _14NMEt a z bur-14 LAKE,
'rn-43l... - ' .f _. , 1.`, d• • 1 _
R
.%!ii
• p
, 4 • a J. • \
qi..•..-•\rary ,...:-.-) t...1.,.'s. ;.�tv w :. i'`r^... �r iri ��t
y. t„... l
.. r - , N Syr
i
•
•
a-c_N. 4EL1-.7
p,L,-M 0 1/1 /d4
0 ZOO 400
FEBRUARY 21,1984
• ( 100 VOID 264.0
£1114 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER MICROFISCH 78.;
12115 KURT HAGEN YOUNG ARTIST CONCERT 25.0
12116 ALICIA YI YOUNG ARTIST CONCERT 25.P
12117 KARA WENZEL YOUNG ARTIST CONCERT 25.0
12118 JENNI MOULTON YOUNG ARTIST CONCERT 25.1'
12119 INSTY PRINTS PROGRAM FOR YOUNG ARTIST CONCERT 39.1
12120 KATHRYN BAILY REFUND-BATON & DANCE CLASSES 12.0
12121 JACQUILYN BIRNATZ REFUND-BATON & DANCE CLASSES 12.C.
12122 MOLLY DONOVAN REFUND-BATON & DANCE CLASSES 12.0
12123 HEIDE JOHNSON REFUND-BATON & DANCE CLASSES 12.0
12124 RACHEL JOHNSON REFUND-BATON & DANCE CLASSES 12.0
12125 DANA LONGMAN REFUND-BATON & DANCE CLASSES 12.t?.
12126 ALICIA LOVAS REFUND-BATON & DANCE CLASSES 12.0
12127 BECKY MAHOWALD REFUND-BATON & DANCE CLASSES 12.0
12128 CHRISTINE PRENTICE REFUND-BATON & DANCE CLASSES 12.0) '
12129 JUST INA ROSS REFUND-BATON & DANCE CLASSES 12.C;
12130 KATE SCHMIDTLEIN REFUND-BATON & DANCE CLASSES 12.0
12131 LISA WOXLAND REFUND-BATON & DANCE CLASSES 12.0.
12132 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES BOOK-MANAGER 35.Ci:
12133 SUPPLEE'S 7 HI ENTERPRISES FEBRUARY RENT 3570.9•
12134 S WEST SNOWMOBILE TRAILS ASSOC SERVICE 4584.E.
12135 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EXPENSES-FINANCE DEPT 5.0.
12136 AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOC FEE-COMMUNITY CENTER ' 500.0
12137 ED PHILLIPS & SONS LIQUOR 6361.4.: '
138 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 330.9.
12139 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO WINE 290.5
12140 QUALITY WINE CO LIQUOR 1416.
12141 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO WINE 576.7:
12142 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 3631.3,
12143 TWIN CITY WINE CO WINE 1221.7
12144 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE 296.9. t
12145 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR LIQUOR 3275.4.
12146 TAt•P•IMY VALLANT REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES • 9.C'
12147 M R P A CONFERENCE-PARKS DEPT 100.0`
12148 SAFETY SYSTEMS INC CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 245.0
12149 MINNESOTA POLICE & PEACE OFFICERS 1984 DUES-POLICE 240.E
12150 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 2/03/84 16794.:
12151 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 2/03/84 9524.4
12152 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS PAYROLL 2/03/84 12195.:•'
12153 AETNA LIFE INSURNACE CO PAYROLL 2/03/84 114.0
12154 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 2/03/84 65.0
12155 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURNACE CO PAYROLL 2/03/84 3411.0
12156 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLS PAYROLL 2/03/84 110.7
12157 INTRENATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING PAYROLL 2/03/84 551.0
12158 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASS PAYROLL 2/03/84 15344.E
12159 SUN COMMUNITY DIRECTORIES PHONE DIRECTORIES-POLICE DEPT 55.0
12160 VOID OUT CHECK O.C:
12161 US POSTMASTER POSTAGE-POLICE DEPT 635.E
•2162 DANA GIBBS PACKET DELIVERY 78.0
2163 MINNESOTA BOARD OF PEACE OFFICERS LICENSE. FEE-POLICE DEPT 10.(
12164 TREASURER-STATE OF MINNESOTA CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 15.(. ?
12165 NORTHCO LTD FEBRUARY RENT 3390.?:
12166 CAROL YO)ER REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 13.0
12167 WENDY BURNS-CARLSON INSTRUCTOR/SKATING/FEES PD 1098.7'. ;
9019459 2g2
"168 RALPH KRATOCHVIL INSTRUCTOR/EXCERCISE CLASSES/FEES PD 35.00
(
69 CAPIIOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO WINE 169.32
12170 PAUSTIS & SONS • WINE 559.84
12171 PRIOR WINE WINE 197.31
12172 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO WINE 217.43
12173 QUALITY WINE CO LIQUOR 2325.91
12174 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 3667.10
12175 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 445.76
12176 TWIN CITY WINE CO WINE 622.76
12177 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 3624.53
12178 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR LIQUOR 2453.02
12179 WELCH VILLAGE EXPENSES-SKI TRIP/FEES PD 594.00
12180 QUALITY FITNESS HYDROSTATIC WEIGHING/FEE PD 136.00
12181 DON OPHEIM REFUND-SKI TRIP 6.00
12182 STEPHANIE HARRER REFUND-SKI TRIP • 6.00
12183 BEER WHOLESALERS INC BEER 4373.15
12184 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING BEER 147.75
12185 CITY CLUB DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 3704.40
12186 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO MIXES 200.30
12187 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 3476.82
12188 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER 5840.90 !
12189 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING BEER 16.30
12190 A J OGLE CO INC BEER 1132.85
12191 PEPSI COLA/7UP BOTTLING CO MIXES 361.50 ,
12192 ROYAL CROWN BEVERAGE CO MIXES 51.55
-'193 THDRPE DISTRIBUTING CO • BEER 6317.95
.194 LESLIE VILLELLA REFUND-SKI TRIP 6.00
12195 JASON GROMAN REFUND SKI-TRIP 6.00
12195 JANET KOCH EXPENSES-PDLICE DEPT 1.00
12197 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE CO FEBRUARY INSURANCE 661.28 1
12198 GROUP HEALTH PLAN INC FEBRUARY INSURANCE 2181.83 1
12199 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN FEBRUARY INSURANCE 11518.E
12200 Hopkins Post Master POSTAGE-CITY HALL 5000.02
12201 RICHARD KNUTSDN INC SERVICE-ARBOR GLEN UTILITIES EST #7 3822.90
12202 SHAFER CONTRACTING CO SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DR/EST #6 45392.7,0
12203 A & H WELDING STEEL BAR-PARK MNTC 9.71
12204 AT&T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 825.00 1
12205 AT&T INFDRMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 83.44
12206 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 1100.2?
12207 ALTA MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS RESTORATION OF CUMMIN-GRILL HOUSE 5832.C, ;
12208 AMI PRODUCTS INC LEVER CONTROL FOR HYDRAULIC TRUCK-STREET 33.2:
12209 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO SERVICE-LIQUOR STORE 8.85
12210 AFTON ALPS SKI TRIP/FEES PD 156.00 ;
12211 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSN 1984 DUES 173.00 !
12212 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PROOUCTS LAB SUPPLIES-WATER PLANT 270.34
12213 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN SAFETY FILMS-WATER PLANT 25.O ' !
12214 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT CO INC HOSE/PUMP/PULLEY-EQUIP MAINT 440.0', '.
12215 ATLAS PILE DRIVING CO EQUIP RENTAL-FORESTRY DEPT 1012.501.
12216 TERRY AUSTIN INSTRUCTOR/EXERCISE CLASSES/FEES PD 670.4,
12217 AUTOTRMC SPEEDOMETER TESTS 152.C:
'.218 GRETCH & KEVIN BADENHOP REFUND-SWIM 28.0'J ;
-2219 TODI) BASZUCKI REFUND-SWIM 34.00;
12220 EMILIE BEAMS REFUND-SWIM 14.O2:
12221 MICIIAEL BLESI REFUND-SWIM 11.Ot q
}s
1
•
12222 BIG BOB'S REPAIR SHOP REPAIR JAIL DOOR LOCK 30.00
12223 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON SERVICE-PURGATORY CREEK 9450.17
(
24 BLOOMINGTON LOCK & SAFE -REPAIR GATE SWITCH-POLICE DEPT 292.00
INSTALL LOCK-WATER DEPT
12225 BOYER FORD TRUCKS -HOUSING/SHAFT/SEAL/GASKET/RESIVOIR-EQUIP 1624.03
MNTC
12226 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING CO SERVICE-PRAIRIE CNETER DR 665.005
12227 BLAKE BREWER REFUND-SWIM
12228 ANDREA BRUSCH INSTRUCTOR/RACQUETBALL/FEES PO 98.00
12229 BROWN PHOTO FILM/FLASH/PHOTO FINISH/SLIDE PROCESS KIT 429.68
12230 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS' ROCK 190.61
12231 BURROUGHS CORP CHECK PROTECTOR RIBBONS 38.50
12232 BURTON EQUIPMENT INC STEP LADDER-WATER PLANT 254.60
12233 BUTCH'S BAR SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 269.95
12234 STEVE CALHOON DEC & JAN MILEAGE 21.50
12235 CARGILL SALT DIVISION DEICING SALT 372.65
12236 CASES UNLIMITED INC COPY OF COURT DECISION (CE/03/F-$5) 5.00
12231 CHANHASSEN BUMPER TO 8UMPER -OILLCANDBGASBFILTERS/EXHAUSTTCH/HOSES/ 3138.75
PARTS/FAN
-BELTS/MUFFLERS/GASKET SET/BEARINGS/BRAKE
-DRUM/CLUTCH/HEATER/ANTI-FREEZE/FUSES/DISK
PADS/REGULATOR 129.00
12238 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS CHAINS/FLAT FILES/PLATES 17.00
12239 JEFF CHAUNAY REFUND-SKATE
1224D CHICAGO & NW TRANSPORTATION CO INSTALL FLASHING LIGHT SIGNALS 6011.39
12241 CLUTCH & U-JOINT -HOSES/END YOKE/REPAIR TANDEM PUMP/SIDE 2099.89
GEAR/SIDE PINON D54.45
2 1
42 COPY EQUIPMENT INC FILE & STRIPS-ENG DEPT 0
1'1243 CORPORATE LEARNING CENTER CONFERENCE-COMM SERVICES . 595.00.03
12244 COUNTRY CLUB MARKET SUPPLIES-CITY HALL i
12245 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CO INK-CITY HALL 7.9437.
12246 CURLE PRINTING CO BUSINESS CARDS-PLANNING DEPT
12247 CUSTOM RADIUS CORP MOTOR-COMM CENTER 126.50 1
12248 CUTLER-MAGNER CO QUICKLIME-WATER PLANT 6985.47 i
12249 DALCO -VACUMN-WATER DEPT 1187.01
FILTER/MOTOR/CLEANING SUPPLIES-C/CENTER 1229.50 (
12250 DORHOLT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
12251 BUD DAMON TUNED GRAND PIANO-HISTORICAL CULTURAL 2B.00 i
12252 DORSEY & WHITNEY LEGAL SERVICE 2260.00
12253 DRISKELLS SUPER VALU CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMM CENTER 254.35
12254 EAU CLAIRE COUNTY CLERK DF COURT WITHHOLDING FROM EMPLDYEE PER COURT ORDER 280.00
12255 EDEN PRAIRIE SANITATION JANUARY TRASH PICKUP i
12256 CITY OF EDINA JANUARY 1984 TESTS-WATER PLANT 93.5018.00 1
12257 JEFF ELWELL MILEAGE 553.06 ,
12258 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS 12 COT BLANKETS-FIRE DEPT 214.84
12259 EMERGENCY SERVICE SYSTEMS INC REPAIR SQUAD CAR
12260 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS CHAIR/ELECTRIC ERASER-POLICE DEPT 322.50 ?
12261 KAREN ENO -MINUTES FOR FEB 6 PARK & REC COMM MEETING 72.00 1
12262 RON ESS FEES PD/Broomball Official 144.00 (
12263 EXIDE BATTERY? SLAES 8ATTERIES-EQUIP MAINT 206.51 I
"264 FAIRVIEW CDMMUNITY HOSPITALS TESTS-POLICE DEPT 25.00
_265 FEED-RITE CONTROLS INC SULFATE-WATER DEPT 2785.6E
12266 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN EMERGENCY CASE-FIRE DEPT 16.951
4394593 i
208
. 12267 THE FITNESS STORE WEIGHT EQUIPMENT-PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG 223.50
12268 JAN FLYNN JANUARY MILEAGE 31.51'
69 G & K SERVICES JANUARY SERVICES/JACKETS/TOWELS 72.30
�ia70 G L CONTRACTING INC SERVICE-TOPVIEW & NORTHMARK 1063,00-
12271 GARDNER HARDWARE CO SWIVEL SPINDLE-COMM CENTER 651.29
75
12272 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC RADIO REPAIR & PARTS
12273 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO -2 CITY RADIOS-EQUIP MAINT/13 WALLMOUNT 6929.00
RADIO UNITS-POLICE 325.37
12274 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS CO OFFICE SUPPLIES
12275 HACH PHOSPHATE/NITRATE NITROGEN-WATER PLNAT 443.12
12276 ANGIE HARRINGTON ' REFUND-SWIMMING CLASS 34.00 !,
12277 KARIN HARRIS INSTRUCTOR/EXERCISE CLASS/FEES PD 307.20
12278 HENNEPIN COUNTY-GENERAL ACCOUNTIN TRAFFIC TICKETS-POLICE DEPT 511.50
12279 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER DECEMBER 83 BOARD OF PRISONERS-POLICE DEPT 1356.00
12280 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE-CDMM CENTER 300.00
12281 HERITAGE PRINTING PRINTING-COMM CENTER & POLICE DEPT 396.09
12282 HEWLETT PACKARD BOOK-FINANCE 24.00
12283 BRYAN HIPP REFUND-SWIM CLASS 12.00
12284 HOPKINS DODGE SALES INC BRAKE HOSE/SPEEDOMETER CABLE-EQUIP MAINT 40.36
12285 RICHARD HOPSON REFUND-RAQUETBALL CLASS 22.00
12286 ICMA BOOK-MANAGER 19.50
12287 INTERDESIGN FINAL PAYMENT-CITY SERVICES 10802.62 i
12288 DOREEN ISAACSON REFUND-SWIM CLASS 13.00
12289 J & R RADIATOR CORP RADIATOR CORE-EQUIP MAINT 154.53
12290 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 404.14
12291 GOE JEWELL ELECTRIC MOTORS REPAIR ELECTRIC HEATER-FIRE STATION 20.00
37.32
EXPENSES-COMM SERVICES
19?92 BARBARA JOHNSON I 93 JEAN JOHNSON EXPENSES-PLANNING DEPT 76.8D
12294 JONES TRUCKLINES INC FREIGHT CHARGES-ENG DEPT 34.08
12295 KATE KARNAS AIR FILTER REPLACEMENT-PLANNING DEPT 11.98
12296 KARULF HARDWARE INC -TILE CEMENT/FUNNEL/HOOKS/FLASHLIGHTS/ 1175.94
-FILTERS/PAINT THINNER/PAINT BRUSHES/WIRE/
-AXE/COUPLINGS/BATTERIES/DRILL BITS/PAPER
• -TOWELS/LOCKS/ELECTRIC OUTLET/SCREWS/
-CLAMPS/GRINDER/MAIL BOX/PIPE TAPE/PUMP/
-LIGHT BULBS/GAS CAN/SANDPAPER/RID ICE/
BOLTS/ANCHORS/OIL/GREASE
12297 KLEVE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING BEARINGS-PARK MAINT 20.80
12298 KOHLER MIX SPECIALTIES ICE CREAM/CONCESSION SUPPLIES-COMM CENTER 50.52
12299 Void 12.10
12300 KOKESH SCOREBODK-ATHLETIC COORDINATOR 4.00
12301 CLARE EXPENSES-COMM SERVICES
12302 KRAEMERS TRUE VALUE SWITCH/BOLTS/BATTERIES/OUTLET/HEAT CABLES 253.30
12303 LANCE SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 80.70
12304 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON CABLE TV LEGAL SERVICE 1501.25
12305 LEEF BROS INC JANUARY RUG SERVICE/COVERALLS 505.99
12306 LIBERTY ENVELOPE CORP ENVELOPES-WATER BILLING DEPT 264.81
12307 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC BOX SPRING-EQUIP MAINT 38.97
12308 LOGIS JANUARY SERVICE 5557.02
123D9 LYMAN LUMBER CO LUMBER-PARK DEPT 23.99
12310 MACDONALD & MACK PARTNERSHIP RESTORATION OF CUMMINS-GRILL HOUSE 50.00 �.
-i11 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC EXPENSES 7.45
312 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT 100.27
12313 MERIT/JUL1AN GRAPHICS ENVELOPES-CITY HALL 388.80
3537407
•
12314 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COtMIIS FEBRUARY SAC CHARGES 32818.50
5 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMIS MARCH 1984 SEWER SERVICE CHARGE 58910.77
1-16 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO CONCESSION SUPPLIES-COMM CENTER 301.95
12317 Void
12318 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP WINTER MIX-STREET 68.15
12319 MPLS AMERICAN RED CROSS LIFESAVING BOOKS-COMM CENTER 49.00
12320 MINNESOTA BEARING CO BEARINGS-WATER PLANT 111.30
12321 MINNEGASCO SERVICE 1067.33
12322 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP JANUARY 1984 SERVICE 35.25
12323 M V GAS CO GAS-SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER 400.40
12324 MODERN TIRE CO REPAIR TIRES-EQUIP MAINT 71.00
12325 MOTOROLA INC MOVE RADIO TRANSMITTER-FIRE OEPT 2560.00
12326 MUNICIPAL BLOG-CITY OF WOODBURY 1984 MEMBERSHIP DUES 4980.60
12327 MURPHY PLUMBING & HEATING CO VALVES-WATER PLANT 48.65
12328 NAP COMMERCIAL ELECTRONICS CORP -INTERCOM FOR EMERGENCY OPERATING CENTER- 753.65
POLICE OEPT
12329 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN BOOKS-FIRE OEPT 95.08
12330 KATE NELSEN REFUND-SWIM CLASS 12.00
12331 NEW GAMES FOUNOATION BOOKS-COMM SERVICES 16.75
12332 JEFF NICPON REFUNO-SWIM CLASS 34.00
12333 NOREN PRODUCTS INC HEAOLIGHTS-POLICE DEPT 27.83
12334 NORTHERN STATES POWER SERVICE 4638.42
12335 NORTHERN STATES POWER SERVICE 8155.15
12336 NORTHERN STATES POWER SERVICE 2.83
12337 NORWEST BANK MINNEAPOLIS BONO PAYMENTS 916396.75
1'338 N W BELL SERVICE 4109.42
39 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK OF MPL SERVICE 120.00
1c340 CURTIS OBERLANDER EXPENSES-POLICE OEPT 18.35
12341 OFFICE PRODUCTS SERVICE CALCULATOR-LIQUOR STORE 49.75 1
12342 CiiAitLES PAPPAS MILEAGE-COMM CENTER 14.62
12343 MINE PAUL ELECTRIC INC -WIRE CHLORINE RECORDER/INSTALL 000R BELL 3030.79 i
-SYSTEM/CHEMICAL STORAGE ROOM LIGHTS/
INSTALL HEATER IN PUMPHOUSE #1-WATER OEPT
12344 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING CO CONCESSION SUPPLIES-COMM CENTER 235.00
12345 CONNIE PETERS MILEAGE-COMM CENTER 18.50
12346 PHOTOS INC MAPS-PLANNING OEPT 145.00
12347 THE PINK CO TOWELS-FIRE OEPT 275.00
12348 PLAQUES PLUS INC SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 60.46
12349 POWER BRAKE EQUIP CO WARNING FLASHERS-FIRE OEPT 17.20
12350 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC CO -ELECTRICAL WORK-FIRE STATION 298.25
REPAIR SKATE SHARPENING MOTOR-C/CENTER
12351 NATL TRUST FOR HIST PRES BOOKS-COMM SERVICES 8,80
12352 PRIOR LAKE AGGREGATES INC SAND 1052.22
12353 R & R SPECIALTIES INC SHARPEN ZAMBDNI BLAOES 144.00
12354 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS CASH REGISTER TAPE-LIQUOR STORES 15181.1675.92
12355 CITY OF RICHFIELD CABLE TV EXPENSES
12356 RICHFIELD BUS CO BUS SERVICE-COMM SERVICES/SKI TRIP 360.01
12357 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC -SERVICE-ARBOR GLEN/LAVONNE INO PK/CTY RD 7758.5;
67 WATERMAIN/PRAIRIE CENTER ORIVE
1235E ROAD RESCUE INC FACEPLATE COVERS-FIRE OEPT 5.90
'1359 EMMETT SAGER 1984 LICENSE FEE-STREET OEPT 15.DJ
,6O SAILOR NEWSPAPERS INC ADS-COMM CENTER 175.20
12361 SAILOR NEWSPAPERS INC AOS-LIQUOR STORES 135.03 h
12362 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES INC PORTABLE RESTROOMS-PARK OEOPT 715.71
2980 ii
1..
•
•
r 12363 SAUNDERS-THALDEN & ASSOC INC SERVICE-PURGATORY CREEK RECREATIONAL AREA 2169.51
12364 SAY ELECTRIC INC -INSTALL 3 CEILING FANS-PUBLIC SAFETY 2098.45
INSTALL 3 SMOKE OETECTORS-PS BLDG 7.50
_s65 DOROTHY SCHWARTZ REFUND-SKATING
12366 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO -BATTERY CHARGER-POLICE DEPT/LATHE/CHISEL 686.84
PARK MNTC/COVERALLS-SEWER DEPT
12367 SHAKOPEE COMMUNITY SERVICES BUS TICKETS/FEES PD/ORCHESTRA HALL 149.60
12368 SHAKOPEE FORD INC -REPAIR POWER STEERING/REPAIR DOOR LOCK 408.88
/CABLE/RESISTORS/REPAIR HEATER 13.00
12369 ANDREW SIEMENS REFUND-SWIM CLASS 13.00 1
•
12370 JAMES SIMCHUCK 1984 LICENSE FEE-SEWER DEPT 0.00
12371 SIMONE ENGINEERING INC 3 VALVES-WATER PLANT 582.075
12372 STEVEN R SINELL EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT
12373 W E NEAL SLATE CO CHRDME LEGS FOR PANELS-PLANNING OEPT 24.00
12374 W GORDON SMITH CO -REGULAR GAS $2572.50/FUEL-GRILL HOUSE 3500.65
- 640.75/HOSES/OIL/PISTON/MUFFLER/BELTS/
WASHER FLUIO 434.44
12375 SNYDERS DRUG STORES INC PHOTO SUPPLIES-POLICE OEPT 34.44
12376 JOAN SOMEKAWA REFUND-RAQUETBALL •
438.00 ';
00
12377 SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES SERVICE- HOME PROGRAM18.00
12378 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING INC EMPLOYMENT AD-POLICE OEPT
12379 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING INC LEGAL ADS & PRINTING OF HAPPENINGS 1067.7/
12380 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING INC ADS-LIQUOR STORES & COMM CENTER 36.00
12381 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING INC ADS-COMM CENTER 636.00 }
12382 STANDARD SPRING CO CAR SEATS REPAIRED
123B3 MATTHEW STRAND REFUNO-SWIMMING 11.00
» 89.70384 SUPPLEE ENTERPRISES INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 289.70 1
( 385 TLE CONSTRUCTION REFUND PLAN CHECK-BLOG OEPT 22.50 1
1[386 PAULETTE TOMASCHKO REFUNO-EXERCISE CLASS 242.50
12387 TOMBSTONE PIZZA CORP CONCESSION SUPPLIES-COMM CENTER 43.20
12388 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN-EQUIP MAINT 1800.00
12389 TWIN CITY STRIPING ROAO STRIPING 365.00
12390 TWIN CITY TESTING SERVICE-WDDDHILL TR
12391 UNIFDRMS UNLIMITEO -CAPS/NAMETAGS/JACKET/TROUSERS/SHIRTS- 541.45 '�
POLICE & FIRE DEPTS 6.95
12392 UW-EXTENSION ARTS DEVL UNIT BOOK-COMM SERVICES 52.00 1
12393 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CONFERENCES-PARK MAINT 452.0
123'2394 5 VALLEYY INDUSTRIALS INC INC GASMR MACT 193.42'
9CYLINDERS-COMM CENTER 38.15
12396 VIKING LABORATORIES INC BICARBONATE OF SOOA-COMM CENTER 78.4F
12397 VOSS ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO LIGHT BLUBS-FIRE OEPT 78. !
12398 BECKI WARNER MILEAGE 1325.00 ?,
12399 WATER PRODUCTS CO 3 1 1/2" METERS/3 1" METERS 25 601
12400 WESTINGHOUSE SUPPLY CO 8 MERCURY LAMPS-PARK MAINT 175.2C'I
12401 WESTWELO ELECTRODE-EQUIP MAINT 6 .9'
12402 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC REGULATOR-COMM CENTER 218.91
12403 XEROX CORP SERVICE 21.25
12404 ZACKS INC CHAIN-EQUIP MAINT
1
12405 FRED ZIEBOL EQUIPMENT-PLANNING DEPT/ENGINEERING OEPT 137.7
12406 ROGER A LINO HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PO 165.0_..
12407 WILLIAM L CARROLL VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PO 1 88.0.
')40B TROY HANSON OPEN GYM SUPERVISION/FEES PD 138.00
409 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL GIST JANUARY 1984 CUSTODIAL SERVICE
2052470
207F
•
•
1 MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sandra F. Werts, Recreation Superri( dr'
THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager
•
DATE: February 16, 1984
• j:
SUBJECT: Preliminary Marketing Plan for Les Kouba Print and Cummins—Grill
Homestead
The Restoration Committee has completed their preliminary investigation into methods
of marketing the Kouba Print and have included them in the attached report. Methods
to promote interest in the Cummins-Grill Homestead are also included as this is an
integral part of the total marketing stategy. The report has been called a preliminary
marketing plan, as it is the first step in marketing the project. ,
Members of the Committee will be present on Tuesday to discuss the plan with you.
SW:md
•
2.4
A ,
•
PRELIMINARY MARKETING STUDY FOR 711E
CUMMINS-GRILL HOMESTEAD •
GOAL: To provide an on-going strategy of community relations, publicity and
promotion of the Cummins-Grill Homestead.
RATIONALE: By its very nature, the current restoration program of the Cummins-Grill
Homestead is a continuing project. A program that is building "a sense
of history" in Eden Prairie. Therefore, it is important that the Cummins-
Grill tradition be established now, during the restoration years. This
will enable future planners to build on the past as the homestead grows
into a working museum. :.
MARKETING STRATEGIES
1. Community Relations - The most important part of this area of marketing is to
keep the community and its civic and business leaders informed about the progress
and future plans for the homestead. Some methods for accomplishing this are:
A. OUTDOOR OBSERVATIONS: A column in the EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS by Restoration
Committee member Mike Eames. Mike will report items of interest on the
progress of the restoration, as well as mention how to purchase the
Kouba print. The first such article appeared on February 1, 1984.
B. SUGGESTIONS FOR EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS - Establish two-part educational program.
First, build a display to be used at shopping center events, bank lobbies,
Schooner Days and other local promotions. The booth could be staffed by people
in costume to provide literature and information on the homestead, the restora-
tion program and the print. Second, invite leaders of other historical land-
marks
to speak at City and business gatherings. This will give our citizens
a sense of what history can mean to a community.
2. PROMOTION PLANS
A. SUNBONNET DAY: To be held in September. This is the major event of the year.
` The key is getting many people involved. Recruiting for committees is now
underway. Advance publicity will reach the community through ads, stories
in local papers, and shopping center displays. We will also invite support
? .
-y
from other service organizations. A contest is being considered for
school children. Other ideas are still in committee.
B. THE KOUBA PRINT: The print is an important part of the Cummins-Grill
Homestead promotion. The following sales goals have been set for 1984:
. 200 - sales to individuals and groups
. 100 - sales through Minnesota Volunteer article
. 100 - ads in Fins and Feathers, Midwest Art, Wild Life Art News
Total sales - 400 •
As of January 27, 1984, 241 prints have been sold in a year without a concerted
effort. It is felt that 400 prints is a realistic goal.
As part of this sales effort we are contacting people who have placed an
order for the print but have not picked it up. This could result in 40-60
sales.
• C. ADVERTISING THE PRINT: Its main selling features are as follows:
. The name of Les Kouba - and the value of his art
. The tax deduction feature
. The historical value of the print
. The fact it helps to support a worthwhile community project
D. PLANS FOR ADVERTISING THE PRINT:
. Approach local service groups for monetary support and their
individual members to purchase the print. The restoration is
currently recruiting well known people in the community to help
with this program.
. Mr. Eames has arranged for an article and photograph of the print !{
to appear in the May-June issue of the MINNESTOA VOLUNTEER. It is
a publication of Minnesota's DNR, and is sent to people all over
the state. It has a sizeable readership.
gOi
-3-
. Use the print as the cover of Fall Community Program Brochure. The
brochure is sent to almost 9,000 residents and businesses in Eden
Prairie. A four color cover with information on the project and
purchase of a print should reach everyone in Eden Prairie. It is
a good way to increase the awareness of people to the project, the
print, and to Sunbonnet Day that will be occurring around the time
• the brochure is mailed. This would cost an additional $750 over the
actual brochure costs.
. Ads in the EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS and the following nature and art magazines:
- FINS AND FEATHERS
- .•- -- WILD LIFE ART NEWS
- MIDWEST ART
The cost for running a half page ad in each of these publications
• ranges from $375-$665. A budget and an advertisement with coupon
are now being planned.
Attached are two samples of advertising layouts that could be used
in these publications. •
•
• -
S02
•
}
{ 60;k 74 'pi r/r: • --....-
ToLtitf Azar 01. iKpaRztw6 kp_ 1/•%. pQ.
Kr 11 -i^
3 r E+
`4...,. ',, ...
D16 G a f f nirf-ga .edi4i orv.pritit
madons ownn. farm. 1
uba,ar�1 j
c...UCtc I R �,r,.'.
iiimpoi4ap3_
L$.+K _:F:3Yrii8s. t:?k:3 ...�s.s...-. ,�i t 11,004,
•
ccZZEXr.cftr:eadtmot. . :ter I C(A
' •
3o3
Ao r� =p,v�c�s
tZLuce 4 coyd n
7 ye. • !J.... '..i .:/h� 1• .s..t...:..'sr..'w t...y...u.•. ..~T
.N: yy...v'./ti,�:1i•ir `.f:sy'l .l_.�a�ar:.�a �i:'4...-...n..i<�.�i.'MJr`N.M+.YWILyi.•a.i�.
'+9 t .! ....,nwF - Nt^'"1-'wr- •:--e.`..�--.`,,.w-•• ,
t::`,;;: ... •,. .._..•"i:.::y:+1........•.:.:t..:..iu.+1.:..�.1....r ww«,,tw•..c.ixa.�►RU�7y §:'. �,•
t % s:.i<C-...4„,,-•. ..;•,;-•-......r:.t rsr o...:v:...r�....^.:it..41`4?memr rr +~ d� :.,F.
a AFC''''., .. - •.Y1 'i,
;t. .v r,,.;,. .v.... - ......•. -...,__. , v.---:a•:t:i..r "-...:•;,t: 2
a ihTQur11
, (ri t h 5fcrvy reeds
c' hely? t8 I I Ve,orv.
-..2r415EFT=IgrtWX.77-12 Ma
„F arxF.-y; v�;avacr,:'v .v:?y`_'' 'tt - ' .,. - --
=.52114Maitoiner. I -
•
'w : 5u.E£I:.Pi^+• L"rd y T S ^.:d�5a1 I(,�l.: 1 P/�j N .. ti'll**�i
-r
^;��':,.:C.::,a??SL'a.Tx2.+;•�1.:"�i'ar.� 6'A"7'..Q�YY.+i�'^'7� I J`�..... .... - ..... .r... M
J'd LL LLI ILI< IU MU:III INALII IL. I1MU IU4117111 W II II WIIILI<oIILU I/IJIKII.IS
KAY MIIC III LI —• PHONY.
t'11.0.l.101111 11,.,p II 345-5.1.15
•
/ 1
( BOARD 01. 11ENNEPJN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
2•4oO GOVI RNAtr.NT CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESO1A 55487
Date
Name
Address
City, State
Dear
This letter is to inform you that Chapter 112 of Minnesota Statutes, which
governs the establishment and operation of watershed districts, was amended
by Laws 19l2, Chapter 509, allowing affected municipalities within watershed
districts to nominate persons to serve on the watershed districts. I am
attaching a copy of Section 15, Chapter 509, Laws 1982, which clarifies the
following procedures for appointment of managers:
1. If the watershed district is located wholly within the metropolitan area,
the local townships and municipalities within the district, either jointly or
individually, may nominate persons to serve on the watershed district. These
nominees must be submitted to the County Board at least 60 days prior to the
expiration of term of office of that particufr manager.
2. If the townships or municipalities within the district do not submit a list
of nominees within 60 days prior to the expiration of term,. the County Board
of Commissioners may then sel ect the eligible individuals from within the
district.
Also attached is a synopsis of the watershed district(s) affecting your area
which includes a listing of the members and expiration of terms. Please note
that any person nominated to serve on the district must be a resident of the
district and may not be a public officer of the county, state or federal
government.
Should you desire to submit a list of nominees for upcoming vacancies, please
forward them to my attention within the 60 day timeframe. I will submit
your nominations to the County Board of Commissioners for consideration.
Sincerely,
Kay Mitchell
Clerk of the Board
•
•
•
•
( MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Manager Carl J. Jullie C •
,
•
SUBJECT: Snow Removal Policy •
• DATE: February 16, 1984
Mayor Penzel recently received the attached letter from Mr. Voelke, one of fourteen
homeowners in the Mitchell Heights Townhomes project on Tamarack Trail. The
access for these homes, as described in Mr. Voelke's letter, is via a private road
which extends westerly from Tamarack Trail, a City street. The problem they are
experiencing involves the "windrow" of snow deposited by our City plows along the
edge of Tamarack Trail at their private road intersection. The residents desire
that we clear the entire intersection in the same manner that we clean a typical
intersection with two public streets.
Staff has explained to Mrs. Hodgson, President of the Homeowner's Association, that
the City, as a matter of Council policy, does not clean the snow away from any
private driveways and to begin to do so would leave all residents to expect similar
•
service for their private driveway. The City does not have the necessary resources
available which would be required to maintain private driveway entrances. Assuming
( that there are approximately 5,000 such private entrances, the cost to the City would
be $5,000 - $10,000 per storm, plus assuming the liability of entering on to private
property.
It is recommended that the Council reaffirm our present policy of maintaining public
streets only,and direct staff to contact the Mitchell Heights Townhomes Association
and explain our position. Staff has contacted the Public Works Departments of several
neighboring cities, none of which do maintenance of any kind on private streets.
•
CJJ:jp
Attachment
6Ulo
•
cFEB 31984 FEB 31984
•
January 31,1'424
•
Mayor Wolfoanp Fenzel
Eden Prairie City Hall
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344
Lear Mayor.
I really hate to bother you with such a mundane matter as snow, but we
can't seem to get satisfaction anywhere else. Allow me to e+:plain.
I am one of 14 homeowners that live in the Mitchell Heights Tcwr.hcmes at
0200 to E242 Tamarac}; Trail. Our 14 homes are on a -spur of Tamarack Trail
=_t south of Scenic Heights Road. The spur road extends to the west from
Tel-era:I: Trail. It may not even ahow on your map. as it doesn't on moat
cars. The spur is owned and maintained by cur Association. It is
re -at-on atr et width with curbing
The problem is this: pay a private contra:too
to plow cut the snow from
cuz street end drivewe s. He does a ]God job for us. Then along cores the
- 'c a..' :_= the a.._.. l 0_1: into the spur street and one of Us `.as_ t: ;
71.r = ar,� __'t a saett, through the Sr:. pile. or wait for rt= -=t:.
. �.... pcur �c„
to
c.,,_ lack =gain.
- i
;-... .cd oso . . . _ _dent of our ..s=ocoaat.o:n, has called over tc City Hall and
Chit the apur is really a driveway and is treated as =ugh by the
::s. . . . and that's the way :t is. The spur is really cur atreut, we
}.
ea-oh
_:e driveways off the spur street to our __rages.
9ci7
•
rd i we pre.:ai1 upon you to do whatever is necessary to make sure our spur
street doesn't get treated as a driveway? Please ask whomever is in charge
of such things to have the plow reopen our street after clogging it up.
We all appreciate your attention to this matter.
Sincer_1'
•
-avid Voelke
-President
Mit•_hell Hts. T=wnhcmes Assn.
e242 Tamarack Trail
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55744
Fh:ne Lays 541-5'EOO
Thane E.:nir,y-= i24-64O1
•
•
�� G
•l ME1OR\NDl M
T0: •
Mayor and City Council
THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: February 10, 1984 -
SUBJECT: Proposed Cash Park Fee Increases
Attached to this memorandum is a January 25 memo submitted to the Parks, Recreation
and Natural Resources Commission and the Development Commission. The Parks, Recreation
and Natural Resources Commission reviewed this memo at their February 6 meeting and
took no action to change the original recommendation. -- - - -•
The Development Commission reviewed this memo at their February 10 meeting. Two
representatives of developers were in attendance; Don Brauer,and John Newman
representing Mac Hyde. Mr. Brauer indicated that the developers he had talked to•
regarding this issue would not oppose a $2,200 per acre cap on commercial, industrial
and office. Mr. Newman also concurred with that option.
The Development Commission unanimously recommended a cap of $2,200 per acre for
commercial, office and industrial and the increase in residential to $400 per unit
for single family and $305 per unit for multi family.
The Development Commission also pointed out that even with these recommended increases .;
and the very optimistic projections in the estimated revenue in the capital improve-
ment program, the fund balance would be in a deficit by 1988. Staff agreed that the
estimated revenue for the capital improvement program was very optimistic and concurred
that the cash park fees should be adjusted annually to keen up with inflation of land
values and that a bond referendum for park improvement will also be necessary every
five to ten years while the park system is developing.
City staff support the Development Commission recommendation regarding cash park fee
increases for 1984.
BL,:md
YJ0g
•
•
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: _ Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Development Commission
TURU: Carl Jullie, City Manager
•
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community. Services/
DATE: January 25, 1984
SUBJECT: Proposed Cash Park Fee Increase
At the January Sth meeting of the Development Commission, Commission members reviewed
the December 30, 1983 memorandum to the City Council regarding cash park fees. The
Development Commission then set a special meeting for February 10th, at 7:30 a.m.,
at the School Board Room to provide developer's with an opportunity for input on the
proposed cash park fee increase.
At the January 6th meeting, members of the Development Commission suggested the staff
provide a record of the past three years showing the amount of cash park fees collected
from the various types of zones, as well as providing information on the estimated
number of acres left in the industrial, commercial, office and residential zones
according to the existing Guide Plan. Commission members also requested a Five Year
Capital Improvement Program to provide them with information regarding the need for
cash park fees in the future.
The following information provides totals per year on the amount of cash park fees .
committed through approved rezoning for various developments in each of those years.
Some of the developments approved for rezoning were not actually developed; however, the
amount committed for approval indicates fairly closely the actual nercentaEe collected
within each zone. The totals show the amount committed and the total amount of cash
park fees actually collected per year.
1982 1981 1980
Office $28,280 $8,680 $59,280 .
Commercial 10,500 2,520 1,400
fees Industrial 35,000 62,160 16,800
committed Residential 79,425 223,875 132,690
Total committed $153,205 $297,235 $210,170
Actually Collected $116,242 $124,000 $240,137•
Also, attached to this memo is a draft copy of the Five Year Capital Improvement Program
from 1984-1988. This indicates the fund balance at the end of 1983 in the cash park
fee fund was 5267,700. The Five Year Capital Improvement Program revenue projection
makes several significant assumptions:
1. Development 01 growth rate continues with a gradual increase throughout
the five year period. •
310
-2-
2, The City is successful in obtaining State and Federal grants for the
Purgatory Creek Project in 1985 and for the Riley Lake Park Project
.t in 1986, 1987 and 1988. The expenditure portion of the Five Year
Capital Improvement Program also leaves out a significant develop-
ment project which is the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area. No
development costs were included as that information is not avail-
able at this time, however, there is development anticipated for
this period. •
City staff have provided an estimate of the amount of acreage available for development
as of January 1984 that is eligible for collection of cash park fees. The following
list totals the amount of acreage of commercial, industrial, office and residential,
and the estimated cash park fees income based on the existing ordinance (figuring 2.5
units per acre on all residential at $325/unit), a second column representing the
amount of income based on the proposed increases, and a third column representing a
flat fee of $2200/acre for industrial,office and commercial. These fees would probably
be generated over a 10 to 15 year period.
Commercial 185 acres $1400/acre = $259,000 $3400/acre = $629,000 $2200/acre = $407,000
Industrial 458 acres $1400/acre = 641,200 $1600/acre = 732,800 $2200/acre = 1,007,60:
Office 236 acres $1400/acre = 330,400 $3000/acre = 708,000 $2200/acre = 519,00c
Residential 2646 acres 2.5/acre @ =2,149,875 @ $400/unit= 2,646,000 @ $400/unit= 2,646,000
$325/unit _
$3,380,475 $4,715,800 $4,579,60•
The existing ordinance states "The owner of land being subdivided for residential,
commercial, industrial or other uses, or as a Planned Unit Development which includes
residential, commercial, industrial or other uses, or any combination thereof shall
dedicate to the public for public use as parks, playgrounds or public open space a
reasonable portion of the land up to 10% thereof, as determined by the City to be �.
in the public interest and necessary for such uses.
"Subdivision 2. At the City's option, the subdivider shall contribute an equivalent
amount in cash, in lieu of all or a portion of the land which the City may require such
owner to dedicate pursuant to subdivision 1 hereof, in accordance with the schedule to
be set by resolution of the Council."
The existing fees assume that commercial, office and industrial property in Eden Prairie
presently sells for $14,000 per acre, and residential property sells for approximately
$8,125 per acre. The proposed increase would assume that commercial property is selling
for $34,000 per acre, industrial property for $16,000 per acre, office for $30,000 per
acre, and residential at $10,000 per acre.
The City ordinance requires a dedication of up to 10% of the property at the time of
rezoning. At the City's option it may require a cash park fee in lieu of land dedica-
tion, the cash park fee should be the value of the percentage of the property it may
require at the time of rezoning. It is highly unlikely that anyone could purchase
developable commercial, industrial or office property within the City of Eden Prairie
at the time of rezoning for even twenty times the amount of the cash park fee proposed
per acre, therefore, it would seem that the fees proposed are relatively low based on
I the existing ordinance.
311
T
_3_
It has been suggested that the City consider other formulas for determining the cash
• / park fee charge. City staff looked at the possibility of tying the park fee to SAC
N units, as well as the square footage of the buildings constructed. The SAC unit charge
is not consistent in that high water users, of which some industrial development would
be, does not relate to either the number of employees that might be served by the
park system or the amount of property within the City that is being developed in relation-
ship to the amount of property being preserved.
The formula that would base a charge on the square footage does not have a direct
correlation to the number of employees that would be served by the park system, nor
• does it have a direct relationhip to the amount of property within the City being
developed in relationship to the amount of property being preserved. A relatively small
commercial development such as a Hardee's Restaurant might have 60 or more employees
where another commercial store of the same size and space might have as few as 10
employees.
If the rationale for the law that allows the City to require dedication up to 10%
•
of the property is based on the goal to preserve and develop approximately 10%
of the City for parks that will provide service and enjoyment for residents, as
well as individuals who work in the City, then it seem to make sense to tie the park
dedication requirement to a percentage of acreage or its value.
Developer's are concerned with the large increase especially in the area of office and
commercial. Developers's also point out that adjacent communities such as Minnetonka
and Bloomington have no fee for commercial, industrial and office and that communities
( such as Eagan, Burnsville and Plymouth that are in direct competition with commercial
and industrial development in Eden Prairie, have lower fees than those being proposed
by Eden Prairie. They may have lower fees because the property is selling for less per
acre or because they have put a cap on the charge per acre. For example, Plymouth has
a $2,200 per acre maximum fee.
An alternative to the fees proposed for commercial, industrial and office could be
similar to Plymouth's ordiance that has 10% of the assessors's estimated land value
of the undeveloped land with a maximum fee of $2,20O per acre (assuming the maximum
• fee should be set on a competitive basis with other communities rather than actual land
value).
BL:md
•
•
r _
\•
312
FINANCE DIRECTOR JOHN FRANC
MEMORANDUM
f0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Manager Carl J. Jul l ie G
SUBJECT: City Council Agenda for Tuesday, March 6, 1984
DATE: March 2, 1984 •
' JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING:
Please note that the City Council/Planning Commission meeting is scheduled to begin at
6:30 PM. Mr. Enger suggests that our discussion focus in on the issue of how to evaluate
proposed "High Tech" development proposals in order to help resolve conflicts which arise
when "High Tech" is proposed in the Office Zoning District. Memo from Planning Director
Chris Enger will be delivered to your home on Monday regarding said subject.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING:
II. MINUTES
Correct, approve and file minutes of City Council meeting held Tuesday,
February 21, 1984.
( III. A - I CONSENT CALENDAR
Recommend approval of items A - I on the Consent Calendar.
IV. A. PRAIRIE CENTER BUSINESS PARK 3
As noted, this item is continued from our February 21st meeting. Staff has
met with the property owner and with Opus Corporation to discuss ways of
resolving our concerns. Mr. Enger will be meeting with the proponents next
week and there is reason for optimism that we can work out a percentage
of office use and a building design that will be acceptable to all. Opus
Corporation has requested a further continuance to the March 27th meeting.
Staff concurs and so recommends.
IV. B. FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS
Official notice of this Public Hearing was published on February 15th and
22nd in the Eden Prairie News and mailed to all property owners listed on the
preliminary assessment roll for this project. The feasibility report for this
project was received by the Council at our February 7th meeting. On Tuesday
evening Mr. Dietz will be prepared to review the feasibility report, including
estimated projects costs and assessment data.
As noted by letters in your packet, there are some objections to the proposed
assessments. Since the proposed assessment method is unique and apparently
untested in court, there may be the possibility that the City's share of the
final project cost will be somewhat more than the estimated $3,700.
Staff does recommend that this project is feasible and will benefit the properties I
proposed to be assessed.
Mayor and City Council - 2 - March 2, 1984
Recommend approval as follows:
- Close the Public Hearing; and
- Adoption of Resolution No. 84-45, ordering the
traffic signal improvements at the Shady Oak
Road/Flying Cloud Drive intersection, I.C. 52-057.
IV. C. VILLAGE GREENS
Official notice of this Public Hearing was published on February 22nd in the
Eden Prairie News and mailed to 144 property owners within the project vicinity.
The Planning Commission and Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
have recommended approval.
Reconrnend approval as follows: •
- Close the Public Hearing;
- 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 17-84 for Site
Plan Zoning Amendment;
- Adopt Resolution No. 84-37 for Preliminary
Plat approval; and
- Direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement
per Commission and Staff recommendations (and
( any amendments thereto).
IV. D. KINDER CARE
Official notice of this Public Hearing was published on February 22nd in the
Eden Prairie News and mailed to 25 property owners within the project vicinity.
The Planning Commission has recommended approval as per the attached minutes
of February 13, 1984.
Recommend approval as follows:
- Close the Public Hearing;
- 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 18-84 for Rezoning;
- Adopt Resolution No. 84-38 for Preliminary Plat
approval ; and
- Direct Staff to prepare a Summary Resolution of
Approval per Commission and Staff recommendations
(and any amendments thereto).
IV. E. EDENVALE APARTMENTS 2ND ADDITION
Official notice of this Public Hearing was published on February 22, 1984 in
the Eden Prairie News and mailed to 39 property owners within the project
vicinity. Both the Planning Commission and the Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission have recommended approval.
Recommend approval as follows:
• Mayor and City Council - 3 - March 2, 1984
•
- Close the Public Hearing;
- Adopt Resolution No. 84-39 for Guide Plan
Amendment from Medium to High Density
Residential;
- 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 19-84 for
Rezoning; and
- Direct Staff to prepare a Summary Resolution
of Approval per Commission and Staff
recommendations (and any amendments thereto).
•
IV. F. 1984 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT, YEAR X
Official notice for this Public Hearing was published on February 22, 1984
in the Eden Prairie News. Notices were also mailed to our local churches and •
community organizations. Notices were also posted on various bulletin boards.
As noted on the agenda item, the purpose of this hearing is to provide
citizens with the opportunity to comment on the Urban Hennepin County Statement
of Objectives for 1984, and the City's proposed use of Year X Community
Development 81ock Grant Funds.
Recommend approval as follows:
- Close the Public Hearing;
- Motion of approval authorizing the submission
of CDBG Year X proposed activities for the
City of Eden Prairie to Hennepin County for
consideration as part of the Year X Urban
Hennepin County Community Development Block
Grant Application in accordance with the
Housing and Community Development Act of s
1974 as amended
(Please note that no Resolution is requiredo
at this time; however, upon approval by
Hennepin County of the proposed use of CDBG
funds, a Resolution will then be required.)
IV. G. AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 11 OF THE CITY CODE
Official notice of this Public Hearing was published on February 29th in the
Eden Prairie News. Mr. Pauly's office advises that a Public Hearing is required
in connection with any changes the Council makes i.n Chapter 11, which covers
rezoning requirements. Some of the changes proposed are merely housekeeping
items,but others are more substantial, If there are any questions
that staff cannot address fully, I will invite Rodger Jensen to be present
at a future meeting at your pleasure.
Recommend approval as follows:
- Close the Public Hearing; and
I
Mayor and City Council - 4 - March 2, 1984
- 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 20-84, covering
changes in Chapter 11 of the City Code.
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 12410 - 12633
Recommend approval of Payment of Claims Nos. 12410 - 12633 as submitted.
VII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS - CITY CODE REVISIONS
Items VII. A - L cover proposed revisions to various Chapters of the City
Code. This is the first major revision since the Code was adopted in the Fall
of 1982. Rodger Jensen reconmiended that separate Ordinances be provided
for each separate Chapter of the Code to be amended. Please refer to
Lorraine O'Reilly's memo of December 22, 1983, which provides a brief
synopsis of the changes proposed for the respective Code Chapters.
• Recommend approval of the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 3-84 - Ordinance
No. 13-84 and Ordinance No. 21-84.
VIII. A. WELSH CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
As Mr. Enger explains in his memo of March 1st, the rationale for the
differences in the minimum percentage of office use (40% for Welsh and
25% for Ryan) is based upon noticeable differences in building design.
Perhaps a solution would be to allow Welsh the 25% minimum office use
if they will amend their building design to eliminate the loading docks.
K .III. B. PRESERVE COMMERCIAL PARK NORTH 2ND ADDITION
The Official Public Hearing of this platting request was held at the
February 27th Planning Commission meeting. Staff did mail 122 notices to
property owners within the project vicinity indicating that the City Council
would be considering this item on March 6th. The Planning Commission has
recommended approval.
Recommend adoption of Resolution No. 84-41 for Preliminary Plat approval
of the Commercial Park North 2nd Addition as per the recommendations of
the Planning Staff Report dated February 24, 1984.
IX. B. 1. LICENSE FEES FOR "LIVE MUSIC"
On January 3rd, the Council reviewed certain amendments to our Fee Resolution
No. 84-12. At that time staff was requested to further examine Section 2.3
relating to "live music". A concern expressed was that the $40D.00 license fee
may, in fact, preclude live music in the City.
Chapter 5 of the City Code covers the license requirements for "shows" in Section
5.31 and for "dances" in Section 5.32. There may be some ambiguity here because
a presentation with live music could possibly be considered either a show or
a dance. The provisions of Section 5.31 exempt all performances sponsored by
schools, churches, and non-profit organizations, but such exemption is not
provided in Section 5.32.
It is recommended that this matter be referred back to Staff for the purpose
of incorporating Sections 5.31 and 5.32 of the City Code into one common
section, covering both shows and dances & that the $400.00 license fee be
Mayor and City Council _ 5 March 2, 1984
waived for an event sponsored by a school, church, or bona fide
non-profit community organization, and also that all licensed
restaurants would be exempt as well as promotional events for
bona fide commercial purposes. The intent is to impose a fee only
on those spontaneous type house parties and field parties which
can attract literally hundreds or even thousands of sometimes unruly
guests and thereon impose.a substantial burden on our Public Safety
Department.
IX. D. 1. LIONS CLUB PROPOSAL
As per Mr. Lambert's memo of February 27, 1984, staff recommends Council
authorization for City crews to proceed with the proposed parking lot
improvements at Round Lake Park, and accept the commitment of the Eden
Prairie Lions Club to pay an amount not to exceed $4,500.00 in three
equal annual installments as per Mr. Pemberton's letter of February 27,
1984.
•
CJJ:jp
Attachments
CAMERA OPERATOR'S CERTIFICATE
I hereby certify that the microphotographs appearing on this roll of film are true,
accurate,and complete copies of the original records described below.
Reproductions intended to serve as permanent records comply with standards
established by the Minnesota Historical Society.
AGENCY OF ORIGIN: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
RECORD SERIES: COUNCIL PACKETS
INCLUSIVE DATES/NOS: JANUARY 1977 - DECEMBER 1991
ROLL 9 '
BEGINS WITH: APRIL 1983
ENDS WITH: FEBRUARY 1984
2/4/94
ERA
a fe 4
DATE CAM OPERA OR S SIGNATURE 9
CMI
CONCEPT MICRO IMAGING MINNETONKA. MN
PRODUCING LABORATORY CITY/STATE