HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 11/20/1984 EDEN PRAIRIE
CITY�OUNfILAG NDA
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 1984 7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION
BOARDROOM
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Richard
Anderson, George Bentley, Paul
Redpath, and George Tangen
CITY COUNCIL STAFF. City Manager Carl J. Jullie; Assistant
to the City Manager Craig Dawson; City
Attorney Roger Pauly; Finance Director
John Frane; Planning Director Chris
u� Enger; Director of Community Services
( �+r Robert Lambert; Director of Public
Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording
lJ Secretary Karen Michael
INVOCATION: Councilman George Bentley
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
A. Minutes of City Council meeting held Tuesday, September 4L Pg. 2520
M4
B. Canvassing Board minutes from meeting held Thursday. November 8, Pg. 2535
Y9-8 4
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Final Plat approval for MN-TX Business Campus (Resolution No. Pg. 2536
84-3U6j�
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. TEFRA Hearing for McGlynn Bakeries project in the amount of Pg. 2539
400,D00_00
B. TEFRA Hearing for Computer Dot Project in. the amount of "
$3 L400,ODO.OU
C. TEFRA Hearing for Edenvale II Apartments in the amount of "
$�760,000.00
D. TECH THREE by Technology Park Associates. Request for Zoning Pg. 2540
D`fs`trfct Change from Rural to I-2 and Preliminary Plat of 4.35
acres into one lot. Location: South of W. 70th Street, west of
Washington Avenue. (Ordinance No. 125-84 - Zoning District Change
from Rural to I-2; Resolution No. 84-304 - Preliminary Plat)
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,November 20, 1984
E. EDEN PRAIRIE ATHLETIC CLUB by William 0. Naegele, Trustee. Pg. 2547
Request for Planned Unit Development District Review of 17.7 acres
and Zoning District Change from Rural to Commercial Regional
Service for 10.11 acres for an Indoor-Outdoor Athletic & Fitness
Center. Location: Prairie Center Drive at Singletree Lane.
(Ordinance No. 126-84-PUD-12-84 - Zoning District Change from
Rural to Commercial Regional Service and PUD District Review)
F. BLUFFS EAST 3RD ADDITION by the Bluffs Company. Request for Pg. 2557
Zoning District Change from R1-13.5 to R1-9.5 for 9.63 acres for
29 single family lots. Location: West of Franlo Road, South of
Lee Drive (Ordinance No. 128-84 amending Ordinance No. 107-84
rezoning from R1-13.5 to R1-9.5)
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 16860 - 17194 Pg. 2561
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 126-84, Imposing a fee for the Pg. 2569
disposal of Solid Waste, effective 1/l/85
B. Resolution No. 84-305 for Final Approval of Municipal Industrial Pg. 2574
Development Bonds in the amount b3_,400,000.00 for Computer
Depot
C. Resolution No. 84-307 for Final Approval of Housing Revenue "
Bonds in the amount of-9,750,000.00 for Edenvale II
Apartments
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request from Thomas J. Esser, Executive Director of South Hennepin
Human Services Council, to appear before the Council
B. Request from Douglas E. Reuter for change in the City Code Pg. 2575
relating to arg base containers
C. Request �y Eden Commons Apartment Project (Chasewood) for a Pg. 2577
Public Offering of Housing Revenue Bonds in the amount of
13,500,000.00 without a letter of credit.
'III. APPOINTMENTS
A. Appointment of members to the Recycling Advisory Committee Pg 2579
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
B. Report of City Manager
al
C. Report of City_ Attorney
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,November 20, 1984 E.
3
r
D. Re ort of Community Services Director
1. Community Center Water Problems
Pg. 2580
E. Re ort of Director of Public Works
I. Winter sanding procedures Pg. 2581
X. ADJOURNMENT
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, Richard Anderson, Georg,
Bentley, Paul Redpath and George Tangen
CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City:
Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly,
Finance Director John D. Frane, Planning Director
Chris Enger, Director of Community Services Robert
Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz,
and Recording Secretary Karen Michael
INVOCATION: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: all members were present..
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following item was moved from the regular Agenda to the Consent Calendar:
VII. A. became III. G. CSAH 62 (Crosstown) Plan Approval.
The following item was added to the Agenda: VIII. A. Bentley - Request by
Mrs. McGowan.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Agenda and Other
Items of Business as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously.
]I. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. improve and authorize submission of Joint Cooperation Agreement for partici-
Pion in the Urban Hennepin County Community Develo ment Dlock Grant program
FederalFiscal dears I985, I986, 1987 Resolution No. 84-226
C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 53-84, amending City Code Section 11.70, Subd.
3. A. & Subd. 5. E. regard 1 ri(i n.n-accesses signs, includingviolations and
Ines appeals & variances, especially with respect to campaign signs
D. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 56-84, amending City Code Chapter 9, Section
9.40, Firearms Regulations
City Council Minutes -2- September 4, 1984
E. Final Plat Rvmarland Camp-Kurver's Addition (Resolution No. 84-238)
F. PRAIRIE KNOLL, by Hestia Homes, Inc. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 102-84-
UD 8 84, zoning district change from Rural to R1-9.5, approval of Develop-
er's Agreement for Prairie Knoll, and adoption of Resolution No. 84-228,
approving Summary of Ordinance No. 102-84-PUD-8-84 and ordering the publi-
cation of said Summary of Prairie Knoll. •54 single family residential units
on 24 acres. Location: northwest quadrant of Valley View Road and Edenvale
Boulevard.
G. CSAH 62 (Crosstown) Plan Approval (Resolution No. 84-239) - moved to
the Consent calendar - ormerTy was item VII. A.
City Manager Jullie noted that there were some concerns on the part of
the City regarding the berming for Carmel Addition. The County Engineering
Department had agreed to provide for screening and will look at this prior
to the actual awarding of bids which will be sometime in December.
City Attorney Pauly noted that a revised Section 9.40, Subd. 3. B. providing
for fees will be provided for in the Fees Resolution. (Re: II. D.)
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve items A - G on the
Consent Calendar as amended. Motion carried unanimously.
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CITY CODE AMENDMENT to Section 11.70 to regulate signs at the Flying Cloud
Airport, 1st Reading. (Continued from 5/15/84)
City Manager Jullie noted this item was continued from the May 15, 1984,
meeting of the City Council.
Planning Director Enger stated this amendment had been reviewed by the
Planning Commission and the Commission had voted to recommend approval as
per the Planning Staff memo of August 31, 1984, which was included in the
Council packet.
Bob Gartner, member of the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission and
Eden Prairie resident, reviewed the make-up of the Committee and addressed
the reasons for the amendment. He explained the two versions of the Ordinance,
Planning Director Enger indicated the Planning Commission had reviewed this
at its August 27, 1984, Meeting and had recommended approval of the second
version.
City Council Minutes -3- September 4, 1984
Gartner said the question of enforcement has been raised. He said the
businessmen at Flying Cloud would like to cooperate and don't foresee
any problems with the businesses that are there now.
Bentley said he thought the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission
had done a good job and he felt that the Metropolitan Airports Commission
and the businessmen should also be thanked for their cooperation.
Enger said he would like to have time between the 1st and 2nd Readings
to look into enforcement procedures. He said these regulations would
apply to commercially licensed buildings which are controlled by MAC.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing
and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 114-84 (version 2), regulating
signs at Flying Cloud Airport. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Fall 1984 Special Assessment Hearing. (Resolution No. B4-219A) -
continue from II 8/B4
City Manager Jullie noted this item was continued from the August 28,
1984, Council Meeting. Jullie said Staff would recommend reducing the
assessment for tree removal against the Carey property in half from
$485 to $242.50, adopt the assessments on the Hustad properties, and
continue the hearing on the Faulk's tree assessment and the trunk sewer
and water assessment against Crescent Ridge. City Attorney Pauly reviewed
discussions with attorneys for the various parties which had taken place
since the last meeting.
Director of Public Works Dietz stated he had met with attorneys for the
Hustads and they wish to keep their options open by leaving their appeals
as presented at the last meeting.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing
and to adopt Resolution No. 84-219A and to continue action on the Crescent
Ridge assessment for trunk sewer and water and the Faulk's tree assessment
to the September 189 1984, meeting of the City Council. Motion carried
unanimously.
C. Request for Multi-family Housing Bonds in the amount of $6 000 000.00 for
Eames Partnership ki�esolution No. 84-225 continued from 8/28/84
City Manager Jullie noted this item was continued from the August 28, 1984,
Council meeting.
David Ames addressed the proposal.
Bentley asked what the City's standing is regarding low and moderate income
housing. Planning Director Enger stated the Metropolitan Council has indicated
the City should have 790 units by 1990. He said the City now has 61 housing
units for the elderly. He indicated the City's goals will not be exceeded
with this project.
ity Council Minutes -4- September 4, 1984
Bentley asked if the location of the proposed project could justify this
type of housing in regard to low income and handicapped -- is it near
shopping and transportation. Enger said this project is more for moderate
income residents.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing
and to adopt Resolution No. 84-225, adopting a program, and giving preliminary
approval to a development and its financing, under Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 462C and authorizing submission of the program to the Minnesota
Housing Finance Agency for review and approval. Motion carried with Bentley
voting "no."
D. Request for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of
$1,675,000.00 for Re no ds Printing (Resolution No. 84-223 continued
from 8/28 84
City Manager Jullie indicated this request had been continued from the
August 28, 1984, meeting of the City Council.
Tony Feffer, Investment Services Group, Inc., addressed the request.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to close the Public Hearing
and to adopt Resolution No. 84-223, relating to the authorization and
issuance of revenue bonds of the City under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
474, for the purpose of financing a project thereunder; giving preliminary
approval and making an allocation with respect to the project and authorizing
an application by the City to the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic
Development. Motion carried unanimously.
E. VALLEY LAKE BUSINESS CENTER, by GSB Investments. Request for Comprehensive
ui e P an c ange rom ow Density Residential and Undesignated to Office/
Industrial; zoning district change from Rural to 1-2 for 4.4 acres for a
50,000 sq. ft. office/industrial building (with variances); and preliminary
plat of 10.63 acres into one lot and one outlot. Location: east of Prairie
Center Drive, south of Valley View Road, along the northwest shore of Smetana
Lake. (Resolution No. 84-235 - Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low
Density Residential to Office; Ordinance No. 103-84 - rezoning; and Resolution
No. 84-236 - preliminary plat)
City Manager Jullie said notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Gerald Portnory, proponent, addressed the request.
City Council Minutes -5- September 4, 1984
Planning Director Enger stated this request had been reviewed by the
Planning Commission at its meeting on August 13, 1984, at which time it
voted to recommend approval subject to the recommendations included in
the Staff Report of August 10, 1984.
Director of Community Services Lambert stated the Parks, Recreation &
Natural Resources Commission had reviewed this proposal at its last meeting
at which time it voted to recommend approval subject to the conditions in-
cluded in the August 10, 1984, Planning Staff Report and with the provision
that a 20' wide trail easement be dedicated at the 840'contour connecting to
the City's north-south trail and that a scenic easement be granted to the
south to Smetana Lake.
Bentley asked what would happen if the Council decided to zone this parcel
to office rather than to I-2 Park. City Attorney Pauly said the Hearing
had not been published for such a change. Bentley asked which would carry
more weight, zoning or a Guide Plan change. Pauly said the Guide Plan
change would because it essentially provides the development control.
A discussion ensued as to whether office or industrial would be the appro-
priate type of designation/zoning.
Anderson noted that Lee Data, Wilson Ridge, etc. all have trails. He
asked if the City had any plans showing these trails and their connections.
Lambert said there is a trails map which does show the trails in this area.
Bentley asked if the question of easements to the Kosteka property been
answered. Portnoy reviewed the problem and how it has been addressed.
Gary Kosteka, 10805 Valley View Road, said he is concerned about selling
his easement as he would still like to be able to have access onto Valley
View Road. Enger said Staff had recommended joint driveways for these two
landowners. Kosteka indicated this net with his approval.
Pat Kosteka, 10805 Valley View Road, said she thought this was a nice
project.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing
and to adopt Resolution No. 84-235, amending the Comprehensive Municipal
Plan. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to give 1st Reading to Ordinance
No. 103-84, rezoning. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No. 84-236,
approving the preliminary plat of Valley Lake Business Center for GBS Invest-
ments. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to direct Staff to prepare a
Developer's Agreement subject to the recommendations of Commissions and
f2'i2t�
City Council Minutes -6- September 4, 1984
Staff. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to direct Staff to prepare
preliminary guidelines for an office/service zone for review by the Planning
Commission and the City Council. Motion carried unanimously.
Anderson said he felt it was time for the Council to meeting with the
Planning Commission to review the office/tech zone as well as the 9.5
zone. He said Staff should suggests possible dates for such a meeting.
F. LANDMARK WEST, by Landmark Northwest, Inc. Request for Comprehensive Guide
Plan Amendment from Office to Neighborhood Commercial; Planned Unit Develop-
ment Concept Amendment; zoning district change from Rural to Neighborhood
Commercial (with variances), and preliminary plat of 7.29 acres for service
uses (retail, 200-seat restaurant, health club, fast food restaurant,and
gas station/convenience store.) Location: southeast corner of Shady Oak
Road and City West Parkway. (Resolution No. 84-229 - Comprehensive Guide
Plan Amendment from Office to Neighborhood Commercial; Resolution No. 84-230
- Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment.of City West PUD; Ordinance No.
104-84 - rezoning; and Resolution No. 84-231 - preliminary plat)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
John Uban, representing the proponent, addressed the proposal. Also
present was Paul Dahlberg, architect with Korunsky, Krank & Erickson.
Planning Director Enger indicated the Planning Commission had considered
this request at four different meetings. At its meeting on August 13, 1984,
the Commission voted to recommend approval of the requests subject to the
recommendations included in the June 8, 1984, and August 10, 1984, as
amended by the Commission.
Director of Community Services Lambert stated the Parks, Recreation &
Natural Resources Commission had reviewed this request at its second meeting
in August at which time it voted to recommend approval subject to the recom-
mendations included in the Planning Staff reports.
Bentley said he felt this was a major change in the plan which had been
proposed as a concept. He said he felt t;ie City Council should only take
action on the Guide Plan Amendment; it should defer action on the remaining
portion of the request until a later date.. Redpath concurred and called
attention to a letter dated August 13, 1984, regarding rezoning of the City
West property which was received from the Uherkas. This letter noted that
this was a considerable change from what had first been proposed. Redpath
said he felt the properties west of Shady Oak Road should be given some
consideration as to overall use.
r r
tJ ty Council Minutes -7- September 4, 1984
Tangen said he felt the Council should only discuss the Guide Plan Amendment.
Uban said the developer would like to begin construction as soon as possible.
He said they have worked through the process over a period of time and he
said they would like to have the City Council act on all the elements of the
request this evening.
Bentley noted that the City Council is the final determining body as to
Guide Plan changes. He said he was not unsympathetic with the time problem
but stated the Council has a responsibility to the residents of Eden Prairie
to do the best job it can.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to limit discussion to consideration
of the Guide Plan Amendment change only this evening and to continue action on
the remainder of the request to a later date,
Redpath said he would like to have that sector of the City looked at again.
Penzel said he would concur; he would like to see this referred back to the
Planning Commission for a sector review. Penzel said he would like to see
a review of the land uses as they were originally proposed by the Guide Plan
in this area. Bentley said he thought the plan seemed to be well conceived
but he felt there were extenuating circumstances which needed further review.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously.
Redpath said he was tired of having all these Guide Plan changes come
before the Council.
_ MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to refer this request back to
Staff for a Sector Study followed by review by the Planning Commission.
Tangen said he would vote "no" on the motion as there was no one in the
audience speaking for this. Tangen noted there is no neighborhood-type
commercial-service facility in this area of the City and something like
this is needed and necessary. He said he felt there was merit in this
proposal and that a Guide Plan change was warranted. He said he would like
to look at the other uses in the proposal in more detail, but would support
a Guide Plan change at this time.
Penzel asked Enger how long a sector study would take. Enger said it could
be done very quickly because Staff had developed material in this area
for the Carmel development and had material readily accessible for City West.
He said a study could be completed in time for presentation at the next
City Council Meeting.
Bentley said he was concerned about the relationship of this project and
how it was originally conceived.
�5��a
ity Council Minutes -8- September 4, 1984
Ken Biersdorf, representing the Uherkas, had a question regarding the
Guide Plan and what effect the changes might have on the ultimate use
of the Uherka's property. Enger said he thought it would be looked at
from the standpoint of City West and the surrounding uses. He said he
thought the Uherka parcel would be designated an office-use parcel.
Enger stated that this would have to be looked at as to the impact on
the area of additional office uses in regard to the traffic situation.
He said the use of that parcel could be office or office/commercial.
He said residential use would still be retained on the west side of the
road and that nothing would be done to adversely affect the residential
potential.
VOTE ON MOTION: Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to continue action on this
Public Hearing to the September 18, 1984, Meeting of the City Council.
Motion carried unanimously.
G. BLUFFS WEST 3RD ADDITION, by The Bluffs Company. Request for zoning
district change from Rural to R1-13.5 for approximately three acres and
preliminary plat of I4.3 acres into 20 single family lots. Location:
north of Burr Ridge Lane, south of Purgatory Creek. (Ordinance No.
105-84 - rezoning and Resolution No. 84-232 - preliminary plat)
City Manager Jullie said notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Wally Hustad, Jr., proponent, addressed the proposal.
Planning Director Enger stated this item had been reviewed by the Planning
Commission at its July 9, 1984, meeting at which time it was referred back
to the proponent for revision. At its August 13, 1984, meeting, the Commission
reviewed the revised plans and voted to recommend approval subject to the
recommendations included in the August 10, 1984, Staff Report as well as
those in the July 7, 1984, Staff Report.
Director of Community Services Lambert noted that the Parks, Recreation &
Natural Resources Commission had reviewed this at its August 6, 1984, Meeting
and had voted to recommend approval subject to the recommendations included
in the Planning Staff Reports. Lambert asked if the proponent was intending
to dedicate the outlot to the City or whether this was an easement. Hustad
said this would be dedicated to the City as a gift and would not be in lieu
of cash park fees.
Anderson asked if there was any public access to these outlots. Lambert
indicated there is access to one of them. fie further explained how the
outlots would be connected.
Redpath asked how the City would control individually graded lots. Enger
said that is very difficult to control; he reviewed some of the problems
which have occurred and means by which tfie City might have more control of
these situations. Anderson asked if these methods would be enforceable.
City Attorney Pauly assured him they would be since bonding would be included.
City Council Minutes -9- September 4, 1984
Bentley asked if the proposed drainage plans would meet the needs of the
development. Director of Public Works Dietz said it would.
Jerry Hegge, 10015 Pioneer Trail, said he was concerned about the traffic
patterns in the neighborhood. He said nothing has been done with the inter-
section of County Roads 1 and 18, no capacity has been added to these roads.
He stated that every 10-20-30 houses adds more and more cars. Dietz said
the City Council has approved an agreement with Hennepin County to help
defer the cost of signals at County Roads 1 and 18; he indicated he would
check further into the progress on that.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing
and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 1084-84. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No.
84-232, approving the preliminary plat of Bluffs West 3rd Addition, for
the Bluffs Company. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to direct Staff to prepare
a Summary Resolution of Approval per Commission and Staff recommendations
and including the dedication of the outlot to the City (as a gift by the
developer.) Motion carried unanimously.
H. BLUFFS WEST 5TH ADDITION, by The Bluffs Company. Request for zoning
istrict change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 for 14.5 acres, and preliminary
plat of 14.5 acres into 32 single family lots. Location: south of River-
view Road, east of West Riverview Drive. (Ordinance No. 106-B4, zoning and
Resolution No. 84-215 - preliminary plat)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Wally Hustad, Jr., addressed the request. Also present was Floyd Erick-
son, of RCM, who addressed the drainage problems.
Director of Planning Enger stated this request had been reviewed by the
Planning Commission at its meeting on July 9, 1984, August 13, 1984, and
August 27, 1984. At the August 27th meeting, the Commission voted to
recommend approval subject to the Staff Report of August 24, 1984, with
the provision that no development of the area should be allowed until a
drainage plan has been considered.
Director of Public Works Dietz indicated there had been no attempt on the
part of The Bluffs Company to pay for all the improvements necessary to
improve the drainage. He stated there will be costs assessed to others
in the area for these improvements.
City Council Minutes -10- September 4, 1984
Director of Community Services Lambert said this request had been
reviewed by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission at
its meeting on August 6, 1984. It recommended approval subject to the
recommendations included in the Planning Staff Report and with the
addition of an 8' asphalt trail on the south side of Riverview Road
to connect with the existing trail system.
Redpath asked about the temporary ponding of water and the cost of doing
that -- would it not be better to pay for a solution now rather than later.
Dietz said that, hopefully, by the 2nd Reading the City will come to a
final solution of this drainage problem; we will know the range of the
cost.
Brendan O'Donnell, 11590 Riverview, submitted a petition signed by 10D%
of the residents requesting the City to not adopt this proposal. (The
petition is attached to these Minutes.)
Regis Betsch, 11941 Pendleton Court, said the buyers of the lots on the
north side of the street paid a premium for the lots because the lots
were zoned R1-22 and therefore would be facing homes on larger lots.
Gayle Diehl, 10530 West Riverview, said the Planning Commission had seen
an overlay in which there were 29 lots designated.
Dr. James Diehl, 10530 West Riverview, noted the importance of transition
in this area; there should be a variety of housing-types available in
Eden Prairie and this area could be one of large lots just as those to
the north. He noted the importance of having an area such as this available
to those who live in the area and wish to have larger homes in the same
neighborhood so as to maintain the same type of life style. He said it
was his feeling that the temporary ponds are just an attractive nuisance.
Diehl referred to two letters which were sent by him to the City Council.
(July 2, 1984, and August 13, 1984, which were included in the Council
packet.) He said he did not wish to have to pay for sewer and water which
he did not want or need.
Charles Koshenina, 10541 Riverview Drive, stated he did not wish to have
to pay for streets, gutters, sewer and water which he did not need or
want. Fie said this would amount to a subsidy for this development and
the developer.
Hustad stated The Bluffs Company did not intend to have the residents
pay for sewer and water unless they were hooking up to it; he said The
Bluffs Company would pay for the street improvements.
Redpath noted that when a resident's sewer system fails then that resident
is liable for the sewer access charge and not before that time.
sty Council Minutes -11- September 4, 1984
Jullie stated The Bluffs Company is expecting to be reimbursed for any
resident who might hook up at a later date.
Bentley said he did not feel an adequate transition had been addressed.
Redpath said sewer and water costs keep rising; he noted that, in the past,
the Council and Staff have said that like or similar frontages should be
across from each other. He said he did not know what the transition would
be in this area. Bentley concurred and stated he had a problem with an
adequate transition. Tangen said he felt there were too many inconsistencies.
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Bentley, to continue the Public Hearing
to October 2, 1984, and to instruct Staff to work out details such as the
drainage, the number of lots, and who will pay for the streets and utilities.
Motion carried unanimously.
I. BLUFFS EAST 3RD ADDITION, by The Bluffs Company. Request for zoning district
change from Rural to R1-13.5 for 9.63 acres, and preliminary plat of 9.63
acres for 29 single family lots. Location: west of Franlo Road, south of
Lee Drive. (Ordinance No. 107-B4 - zoning and Resolution No. 84-234 -
preliminary plat)
City Manager Jullie said notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Wally Hustad, Jr., representing the proponent, addressed the proposal.
Planning Director Enger indicated this request had been reviewed by the
Planning Commission at its meeting on August 13, 1984, at which time it
voted to recommend approval subject to the recommendations included in the
August 10, 1984, Staff Report.
Director of Community Services Lambert said the Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission had reviewed this request at its meeting on August 6,
19B4, at which time it voted to recommend approval subject to the recommenda-
tions included in the Planning Staff Report.
Jerry Hegge, 10015 Pioneer Trail, expressed concern about the grading plan.
Enger said the grading would be characterized by 20' cuts and 20' fills;
he indicated there were many areas in which grading of this type had been
done.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing
and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 107-84. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to adopt Resolution No. 84-234,
approving the preliminary plat of Bluffs East 3rd Addition for The Bluffs
Company. Motion carried unanimously.
Y
ity Council Minutes -12- September 4, 1984
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to direct Staff to prepare
a Summary Resolution of Approval as per Commission and Staff recommendations
and with consideration being given to minimizing the grading in the area.
Motion carried unanimously.
J. FEASIBILITY REPORT for Eden Road and Singletree Lane, I.C. 52-011.
(Resolution No. 84-240)
City Manager Jullie reported that notice of this Public Hearing was published
and property owners listed on the preliminary assessment rolls for this project
had been notified.
Director of Public Works Dietz reviewed the details of the proposed
improvements and estimated assessment costs.
Penzel asked how assessments of this type on single family homes were
handled. Dietz said the payments were deferred until the homes were sold
and/or the property was developed.
Bentley asked if there was money available at this time for the construction
of four lanes of Singletree Lane. Jullie said there might be some money
available via the capital improvements program. He said it would be
best to construct that now to contain the costs.
Claire Kooiman, 7936 Eden Road, said she objected to the segment between
Eden Road and Singletree Lake which is presently a dirt road. Penzel said
he could sympathize with Kooiman but it was his feeling that that whole
portion of the City would be developing sooner rather than later.
Tangen asked if there was any differentiation in the manner in which
commercial properties were assessed as opposed to single family homes.
Dietz said there were no proposed differences in the rates assessed.
He noted that the area is considered "land in transition" and the roads
have been designed with that in mind. Tangen asked if the City, by virtue
of this project, is forcing people out and said he was bothered by this.
Bentley said variations in the deferral process might be considered and
looked into. He suggested that the Council look into placing a "cap" on
the amount of interest on special assessments. Anderson asked if that
would put the City in a difficult position. Jullie said if there were a
large number of parcels involved it might.
":ITION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to continue the meeting beyond the 11:30
p.m. deadline to 12:30 a.m. Motion carried unanimously.
.2531
ty Council Minutes -13- September 4, 1984
Dietz called attention to a letter dated August 28, 1984, from Bruce C.
Bermel and John K. Teman.
MDTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing
and to.adopt Resolution No. 84-240, ordering improvements and preparation
of plans and specifications for I.C. 52-011, Eden Road and Singletree Lane
streets and utilities including a 42" pipe and Singletree Lane to be
constructed as four lanes. Motion carried unanimously.
K. TREANOR ADDITION by Guy J. Treanor. Request for preliminary plat of 0.734
acres into two lots for residential development. Location: 15135 Valley
View Road. (Resolution No. 84-214 - preliminary plat)
City Manager Jullie indicated notice of this Public Hearing had been
published and property owners within the project vicinity had been
notified.
Guy Treanor, proponent, addressed the request.
Mary Lahti, owner of property to the west, speculated that this division
of property would lessen the value of his property.
Planning Director Enger noted the Planning Commission had voted to recommend
approval of the preliminary plat.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to close the Public Hearing
and to adopt Resolution No. 84-214, approving the preliminary plat of
Guy Treanor. Motion carried unanimously.
L. T.E.F.R.A. HEARING on the Thomas Hotel IDR Project in the amount of $9,1709000.00
(Resolution No. 84-237)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published.
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Bentley, to close the Public Hearing
and to adopt Resolution No. 84-237, extending public approval previously
given to a project under the Municipal Industrial Development Act. Motion
carried unanimously.
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 157I8 - 15829
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Payment of Claims
Nos. 15718 - 15829. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Redpath, Tangen and
Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
d. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
There were no reports.
25��
City Council Minutes -14- September 4, 19B4
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. Woodpile Ordinance
Director of Community Services Lambert called attention to his memorandum
of August 29, 1984, in which this issue was addressed. He said the Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Commission had reviewed this at its meeting
on July 10, 1984, and again on August 6, 1984. It was the recommendation
of the Commission that there be no ordinance regulating woodpiles.
Anderson said he was aware of Bloomington's ordinance regulating construc-
tion equipment, trailer homes and woodpiles. He said he felt this would
become more of a problem as Eden Prairie gets bigger. He said he would
like a definition of what constitutes a nuisance.
Jack Van Remortel, 16031 Summit Drive, said there are rules and regulations
in place now which can take care of the problem; these should be made known.
Penzel asked if there was any provision in the zoning ordinance which would
prohibit storage in the front yard. Planning Director Enger said accessory
structures are not allowed in the front yard.
Bob Mavis, 6620 Lochanburn Road, said he was concerned about the elm wood
stacked on City right-of-way in his neighborhood. He said he felt the City
is asking for a long-term problem.
Bentley said he felt the issue is not one of woodpiles but one of clutter
and attractive nuisances. He said he felt there should be some controls
on not having piles neatly stacked and not having the piles fronting on
streets.
Penzel suggested the City Attorney be directed to bring a definition of
an attractive nuisance back to the Council.
Claude Johnson, 8741 Meadowvale, said he supported the recommendation of
the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission. He said he felt
there would be more problems created if there were regulations as to what
people can and cannot do.
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Bentley, to not pursue a woodpile ordinance
and to request City Attorney Pauly review the present Ordinances of the City
as to what can he done to eliminate nuisances and/or to recommend what might
be needed in this area. Motion carried unanimously.
PETITIONS, RE UESQ TS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. CSAH 62 (Crosstown) Plan Ap rP oval (Resolution No. B4-239)
This item was moved to the Consent Calendar as item III. G.
.2;33
"ity Council Minutes -15- September 4, 1984
II, REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
Bentley - Request by Mrs. McGowan - Director of Public Works Dietz
explained the situation in the Amsden Way area in which Mrs. McGowan
lives. McGowan had expressed her displeasure with what has and has not
been done by the City relative to a drainage/run-off problem. Dietz
said the City had intended to put in a catch basin at the rear lot lines
but that was not possible. The City is now in the process of correcting
the drainage problem and McGowan wants to have the backyards put in an
acceptable state. Dietz explained the problems the City was experiencing
in getting easements from the property owners (McGowans and Richs) and
indicated what was being done under the circumstances under which the
City crews had to operate. The consensus was that Staff had done the
best that it could under the circumstances.
Redpath suggested Staff be instructed to start the rezoning process for
Richard Miller as outlined in Planning Director Enger's memorandum.
B. Report of City Manager
There was discussion as to possible dates to hold a budget hearing.
City Manager Jullie will see if the School Boardroom is available for
such a hearing on Tuesday, September 25, 1984, at 7:30 p.m.
* City Manager Jullie indicated Dick Putnam, Tandem Corporation, had
i' requested in a letter to have the request regarding Muirfield on the
September 18, 1984, Council Agenda. ThP c nsensus was that this had
been continued to a "date certain" by the Council and would have to
be acted upon at that time.
C. Resort of Director of Community Services
1. Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Master Plan and Recommendation
Director of Community Services Lambert noted his memorandum of August
17, 1984, in which the request to authorize approaching the Riley-
Purgatory Creek Watershed District with a proposal to determine the
cost of a study of the Purgatory CreeK Recreation Area Drainage Plan
was outlined.
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Staff
recommendation outlined in Director of Community Services Lambert's
memorandum of August 17, 1984. Motion carried unanimously.
NFW BUSINESS
There was none.
X. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to adjourn the meeting at 12:40 a.m.
Motion carried unanimously.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 19B4 6:00 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Paul Redpath and George
Tangen
CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie and City Clerk
John D. Frane.
ROLL CALL: all members were present.
The Mayor called the meeting of the Canvassing Board to order.
John Frane presented the results of the election held November 6, 1984, and
reviewed with the Council the problems incurred at the counting center. He
indicated that Precinct 7A had been re-run through the City's old counter and
the results were the same. Also, 10 cards from each precinct were re-run on
the new system with the results verified by a visual tally of the cards.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to accept the election results
as presented by the City Clerk. Motion carried unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:3D p.m.
25�5
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNES10TA
RESOLUTION NO. B4-306
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
OF MN TX BUSINESS CAMPUS
WHEREAS, the plat of MN TX Business Campus has been submitted in a manner
required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter
462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances
of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for MN TX Business Campus is approved upon
compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on
this plat dated November 14, 1984.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of
this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named
plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the
certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon
compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on November 20, 1984.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
?EST SEAL
Jo?)ri D Frane, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
10. Mayor Penzel and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering:Technician
DATE: November 14, 1984
SUBJECT: MN TX BUSINESS CAMPUS
(Formerly Shady Oak Industrial Park 5th Addition)
PROPOSAL: The Developer, MN TX Investments, has requested City Council
approval of the final plat of MN TX Business Campus. The site
contains approximately 19 acres intended for the construction of
office warehouse buildings. The proposed plat was formerly
Outlot B and Lot 1, Block 1 Shady Dak Industrial Park Fifth
Addition, located south of West 7Dth Street and east of Lee —
Data in the north 1/2 of Section 12.
HISTORY: Zoning to I-2 Park was finally read and approved by the City
Council on December 18, 1979, per Ordinance 79-37. Ordinances
33-84 and 110-84 finally read and approved by the City Council on
May 29, 1984 and September 11, 1984, amended Ordinance 79-37.
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on
July 17, 1984 per Resolution 84-177.
Developer's Agreements covering this plat were executed on
September 18, 1984, July 2, 1984, May 29, 1984 and September 1,
1983.
VARIANCES: All variance requests not covered in the Developer's Agree-
ments must be processed through the Board of Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: All on-site utilities not located within drainage and
utility easements, as shown on the final plat, are to be
privately owned and maintained. Public utilities necessary to
serve this site have been installed.
Building configuration changes have resulted in the need to
relocatesections of the utility system previously installed.
All relocation work has been completed and is subject to final
acceptance by the Engineering Dept. Resolution 84-205. ap-
proved by the City Council on August 7, 1984, vacates utility
easements no longer needed. The plat now submitted dedicates new
easements necessary to cover the relocated utilities. Further,
r
this plat approval would allow the transfer of Outlot B,
. Shady Oak Industrial Park to the current owners, subject to
utility easements and the owners accepting the responsibility
for current special assessments.
BONDING: The requirements for bonding are covered in the Developer's
Agreements.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of MN TX Business
Campus subject to the requirements fo this report, the Develop-
er's Agreements and the following:
1. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $380.00.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $468.00.
4
i
2�
CTO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John Frane
DATE: November 15, 1984
RE: T E F R A Hearing for McGlynn Bakeries
Project $400,000
RE: T E F R A Hearing for Computer Depot
Project $3,400,000
RE: T E F R A Hearing for Edenvale II Apartment
Project $2,750,000
These hearings are required under the new rule for M I D B's.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #84-304
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EDEN PRAIRIE TECHNOLOGY PARK,
PHASE III FOR
HOYT DEVELOPMENT
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Eden Prairie Technology Park, Phase III for Hoyt
Development, dated September 27, 1984, consisting of 4.35 acres into one lot, a
copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the
provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments
thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of
1984.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
[T-ST:
AM D. Frane, City Clerk
�IN0
F REPDRT
PTanning Commission
„EOM,: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
iM?OUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: October 26, 1984
PROJECT: Eden Prairie Technology Park, Phase III
APPLICANT: Hoyt Development
FEE O'rlNER: William Pearson
LOCATION: West 76th Street, West of Washington Avenue
REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change of 4.35 acres from Rural to I-2 Park.
2. A Preliminary Plat of 4.35 acres into one lot.
� L
Rack round
This site was platted as an outlot,
part of Eden Prairie Technology 30t,` 77�19
I and II, N Park, Phase previously (/-2 PK '
r,,:viewed by the Planning Commission
{n April of 1984. The site was not , I p �.' K � f
'rioned since specific development N �I
and architectural elevations \ "^ '^
not available. PROPOSED SITE
site is part of an 84-acre c`a
ral development plan for office ' N r- Y I '
industrial uses envisioned by a.
)roponent. The attached graphic o-
the relationship between the ` a i1i• `
ific site plan request and _
ire roads and land uses.
r: Comprehensive Guide Plan ident-
an Industrial land use for
site. Surrounding land uses
the
primarily industrial to Y-
T.,.,th and east of the site, with
j,niic open space and high densitysi <`I
redential/industrial uses des- LL
�grra;.ed to the south and west of the 30 9 t
site. Imnediately south of this (n K.L.
across Nine-'•pile Creek, is the
raP
Ar�v-A
h III 2 October 26, 1984
thwest Crossing, Phase II office industrial park proposed by Vantage Corporation.
Thp existing site character can be generally described as gently rolling to very
sty-eply sloped. The site slopes from north to south from a high point at elevation
910 to a low point at elevation 860 along proposed West 76th Street. There is no
sinnificant existing natural vegetation on this site.
Muster Plan
This site is part of an 84-acre general development plan which involves office and
industrial land uses. Since this large area is being developed on a piece-meal
basis, it is very difficult to ascertain the overall impacts of the plan without
having a formal Planned Unit Development request to review. Since this site was
part of a previous plat request, and since access can be provided by an extension of
West 76th Street, submittal of a master plan may not be necessary at this time.
However, since the ultimate development of the site will necessitate the
construction of Golden Triangle Road, the need for a Planned Unit Development plan
with the traffic study will be necessary.
Site Plan
The Site Plan involves the construction of 55,994 square foot office warehouse
building on 4.35 acres of land at a floor area ratio of 0.295.
A total of 186 parking spaces are provided on site. If figured at 50 per cent
office and 50 per cent warehouse, the Code would require the provision of 154
parking spaces.
Building and parking areas meet minimum setback requirements to property lines for
1-> Park zoning. The minimum setback between driveways and property lines is ten
fr-at. The driveway along the west property line should be relocated approximately
five feet to the east.
,€i i T)
e Feral way of describing the grading plan is that the hill in the northwest
r of the site will be cut to fill the low area in the southwest corner of the
Approximately 44 feet of cut will occur in the northwest corner of the site.
i l finished grades on site will range from approximately £162 to 870. Some grading
rth owned by Herliev Helle. The proponent
occur on the property to the no
,'d obtain sir. Helle's permission for any further grading.
. .eater run-off will drain across the parking and loading areas into catch
Water from these catch basins will flow through a storm sewer system to an
m ponding area south and west of the site. From the interim pond, water will
through a swail and a siltation control fence before being discharged into
1=:,;r-'Mile Creek.
{ 4?itie5
and water service can he provided to this site by an extension of the existing
vilt ,r main in proposed tlest 76th Street and by a connection to a existing sanitary
sr;.rr manhole in the northeast corner of the site.
2��ya
n IiI 3 October 26, 1984
t,?'c!Jtecture
li0 lding elevations indicate that three walls will have an office appearance with a
high percentage of glass. The west elevation will have some office on the north and
sci.At.h ends of the building but will be primarily a blank wall with above grade
loading docks.
Primary building materials are proposed to- be stucco, metal panel, glass, and
concrete block. The color selection will be a light gray stucco, with a white metal
panel on top of the windows and a medium gray panel and medium gray concrete block
below the windows. Stucco and glass are the primary building materials with metal
panel and block being used as an accent trim around the windows.
The building materials for Phase I and II were primarily metal panel and glass.
Stucco was used as an accent material over the doors. If a comparison is made
between Technology III and Technology I and II, there are some similarities in
building form and application of materials. Both buildings use stucco as a accent
material at the entrances to each of the proposed offices. Windows dominate the
lower portion of the building. Windows in both projects are recessed approximately
two feet from the exterior face of the building. The major difference between
Technology I and II and Technology III is the application of building materials
above the window. Technology I and II uses a light to medium gray metal panel above
the windows. Technology III utilizes a light gray stucco with a sand finish.
Landscaping
A large berm is proposed along West 76th Street to screen parking areas. The berm
i-, of sufficient height to screen the parking areas. The size of the plant
materials varies between 2-1/2 to 4-inch caliper and eight to ten feet in height for
r,rw; iferous materials.
iqn Framework Manual
rr,ign Framework Manual has been prepared which includes performance standards and
�rictions related to site planning, landscaping, architecture, lighting, signage,
screening. The Design Framework Manual is similar to ones previously reviewed
�innyea 4th Addition and Eden Glen Center. Building materials, which includes
,{I and metal panel, may be acceptable in an industrial area. Office areas
.,id be brick, glass, stone, or any combination thereof.
1RY
Planning Commission may choose to recommend one of the following alternatives:
The Planning Commission could recorrrnend approval of the request for
preliminary plat of 4.35 acres into one lot and a rezoning from Rural to I-2
Park based on plans dated October 5, 1984, subject to the Staff Report dated
October 26, 1934, and subject to the following conditions:
A. Prior to Final Plat, proponent shall:
1, Submit detailed storm water ran-off and erosion control
plans for review by the City Cngineer.
;t>y3
r,h liI 4 October 26, 1984
2. Submit detailed erosion control and storm water run-off
plans for review by the Watershed District.
B. Prior to Building Permit issuance, proponent shall:
1. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
2. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in
advance of grading.
C. Prior to any future rezoning or subdivision in this area, proponent
shall dedicate right-of-way for Golden Triangle Road and shall
submit and overall Planned Unit Development Concept Plan.
2. The Planning Commission could recommend that the development plans be
returned to the proponent for revisions, if any, as stipulated by the
Commission.
2Otl
Planning Commission Minutes 5 October 29, 1964
�r
C. TECH THREE, by Technology Park Associates. Request for Zoning
District Change from Rural to I-2 and Preliminary Plat of 4.35 acres
into one lot. Location: South of W. 70th Street, west of
Washington Avenue. A public hearing.
Mr. Brad Hoyt, representing Technology Park Associates, reviewed the
proposed development and site characteristics with the Commission. Planner
Enger reviewed the findings of the Staff Report of October 26, 1964,
regarding the project.
Hallett asked about sidewalks and bikeways within the development.
Proponent responded that there were none. However, there would be one, or
both, along Golden Triangle Road in the future. Hallett stated that lie felt
it was important to plan for pedestrian trails within industrial areas, as
well as residential areas of the community.
Acting Chairman Schuck asked for comments and questions from members of the
audience. There were none.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Johannes, seconded by Hallett, to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried-4-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Johannes, seconded by Gartner, to recommend to the City
2�;�JS
F Planning Commission Minutes 6 October 29, 1984
Council approval of the request of Technology Park Associates for Zoning
District Change from Rural to I-2 Park and Preliminary Plat for 4.35 acres
into one lot for an office/warehouse use, based on written materials dated
October 4, 1984, plans dated October 25, 1984, subject to the findings of
the Staff Report dated October 26, 1984, with the following added condition:
Sidewalks be added in appropriate locations to be approved by City Staff,
for pedestrian circulation throughout the project.
Notion carried--4-0-0
:,,FF REPORT
t0: Planning Commission
FRO'd: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
i}{itOUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: October 26, 1984
PROJECT: Eden Prairie Athletic Club
LOCATION: Prairie Center Drive at Singletree Lane
APPLICANT/
M OlNIR: William 0. Naegele
REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development District Review on 17.7 acres.
2. Zoning District Change from Rural to C-Regional Service on
10.11 acres.
flackground f- - 12-
The Comprehensive Guide Plan in- hi
dicates a Regional Commercial land
use for this site. The Guide Plan T •
depicts surrounding future land uses 14 .1
as Regional Commercial open space _ } t
and housing. 15 RK
This site is adjacent to the primary
ontrance to the Purgatory Creek PROPOSED SITE r
Recreation Area. Plans for this C i '
rccreation area include a floating a WYJ 1
am phi theater, small boat harbor, 71 �
p 80-3 `�n;aural open space, jogging trails,tennis courts, and a small golf , �j'� •<<,�p��M�yOf
n��i 213'
35! C-RE(
The site is relatively level with a '
high point adjacent to Prairie
(:enter Drive and slopes gently in a
westerly direction toward Purgatory 78 56
Creek. There is some existing RM 65 42Mr, C-REG r,
lowland vegetation bordering the 1 �_u � ,
edge of the proposed developable `
area, primarily willow, ashen,
poplar, and dogwood. R,
The proposed athletic club will nrr f ®—"
den Prairie Athletic Club 2 October 26, 1984
:"ovide both indoor and outdoor recreational facilities including tennis, racquet
?,.:ill, swimming, jogging, and aerobics. The club will be a four-season, family, and
:orporate facility, with 36,000 square feet in building area as well as permanent
and non-permanent bubbles which will cover most of.the tennis court areas.
Site Plan
The site plan involves the construction of a 36,000 square foot, one and two-story
brick building. There will be a permanent air structure of approximately 40 feet in
height behind the building facing Purgatory Creek. South of the permanent air
structure will be a non-permanent air structure for use during the winter months.
The site is being developed at a Floor Area Ratio of 0.16 which includes the future
building expansion, permanent air structure and non-permanent air structure. The
Floor Area Ratio for permanent structures, only, is 0.11. Both Floor Area Ratio's
are based upon 17.7 acres of land.
Total hard surface area coverage is 34.3 percent, or 38.6 percent if future hard
surface parking areas are included. In general, the developable portion of the site
is approximately two-thirds of the total area.
The legal description of the property indicates that the property lines run to the
center of Prairie Center Drive. Although no plat ' request is before the Commission
at this time, a subdivision of the land in the future should be required and include
a dedication of 60 feet of right-of-way from the center line of Prairie Center
Drive. Currently there is a permanent easement for roadway and utility construction
and maintenance over, under, and across the 60-foot strip which lies west of the
centerline of the road. There is also a ten-foot permanent utility and walkway
easement which lies west of this line.
rradin
iice the site is relatively level, a limited amount of grading work will occur on
it.e. There will be fill within the floodplain area to a distance 660 west of the
rf,nterline of Prairie Center Drive. This extent of fill has previously been
,,pproved by the watershed District. The grading plan indicates that portions of the
rite will be in the floodplain area. This is confined to portions of the parking
lot. and tennis court area. All of the permanent buildings are above the floodplain
,'ovation.
?fug Code does not specify a parking requirement for health club facilities. A total
of 213 spaces will he provided, with room for 97 additional spaces, if needed in the
future. The proponent has indicated that there are different ways of determining
narking demands for athletic clubs, by examining parking demands of other existing
athletic facilities in the Metropolitan area, or examining Eden Prairie's zoning
Code for similar uses. Based upon similar uses tinder Eden Prairie's current parking
rrquirements, a total of 108 parking spaces would be needed. The proponent is
providing 45 additional permanent spaces, with room for 97 additional parking
spaces, if needed in the future.
Sincc this site is located immediately adjacent to one of the primary entrances to
the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area, t':ere could be an opportunity for shared
parking if needed.
Prairie Athletic Club 3 October 26, 1904
,_c9 n%
Since berming is not proposed along Prairie Center Drive, the proposed landscaping
alone will not be adequate to screen the parking areas. Since 35 feet of setback
will occur outside of any proposed future road right-of-way dedication, there will
be adequate room to construct a berm of at least four feet in height, with a five-
foot top, at a 3/1 slope. Berming should also occur in the planting island in front
of the service area.
Since the permanent air structure is 40 feet high, it will dominate the site when
viewed from Purgatory Creek and the primary entrance into the recreational area.
Berming and plantings are proposed along the north side of the air structure to
reduce the overall height. The effective height of screening, including berming and
plantings, is thirteen feet. Since 45 feet of setback area occurs between the
parking and permanent structure, it would be possible to increase the height of the
berm ten feet. In addition, larger coniferous trees between 12 to 14 feet in height
could be planted. Thus the total effective height of berm and plantings could be
increased to 22 to 24 feet.
Another option would be that since the parking demand for employees is about 30, the
parking area could change in form and location. This would provide an opportunity
for a larger berm. Adding 64 feet of parking area to the proposed 45 feet of green
area adjacent to the bubble would allow a 17-foot high berm at a 3/1 slope.
Elimination of some of the excess staff parking along the northern edge of the
property provides the opportunity for more effective berming and landscaping
relating to the bubble. The proponent should pursue alternative studies in this
area with Staff prior to Council review.
-inq and planting should also be extended along the west line of the proposed
development limits to screen such facilities from Purgatory Creek. Plantings should
is lude indigenous plant materials, such as willow, aspen and poplar, in order to
1-ovide an appropriate transition to existing vegetation within the Purgatory Creek
Pin a. Since a large portion of existing natural vegetation will be removed along
th(, western portion of the developable area of the site, it becomes even more
to restore this transition. Trees should be planted along the east and
th sides of the tennis courts to screen parking from CastleRidge.
J'.r.hi tecture
,ildinq elevations indicate primary building materials to be brick and wood.
.„rtions of the front elevation are very plain since there is a low glass/brick
„�'io. To create a better "front door" appearance, Staff would suggest the same
r=!)thon window treatment as used on other building elevations be utilized on the
northeast corner.
the large off-white hubble will be highly visible. One way to downplay this
structure would he to use a graduated color scheme (gray or green) with darker color
on the bottom and lighter color on top. This way the upper portion could match the
h.Y and the lower portion blend in better with the berm and plantings. The air
supported structures are a translucent, off-white fabric, with a Criss-cross pattern
of cables.
25u9
n Prairie Athletic Club 4 October 26, 1984
n space
Ow proponent anticipates that the western portion of the site, at a future date,
could be dedicated or donated to the Purgatory Creek Recreational Area. This could
occur concurrent with dedication of roadway along Prairie Center Drive and could
accompany a preliminary plat request. The Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources
Co;anission should determine the extent of park dedication.
Pedestrian Systems
There is an existing sidewalk along the east property line. There should be a
connection between the building and this walkway. In addition, the future hiking
and biketrail system will be within the Purgatory Creek Recreational Area. There
should be an appropriate connection to this trail.
Signa e
For wall signs, Code would allow up to a 300 square foot sign based on the size of
the wall. The proposed 50 square foot sign should be modified accordingly and
details submitted for Staff review.
Lighting
A lighting plan has been submitted which shows location and size. Lighting should
he designed to minimize glare impacts on Purgatory Creek. Lighting details should
be submitted for Staff review.
Utilities
S,iwer and water service can be provided to this site by connection to existing sewer
-,oi water lines in Prairie Center Drive.
m water run-off will sheet drain across the parking areas into catch basins then
n toward an existing 42-inch storm sewer line which will be extended from
Ietree Lane to an outlet structure adjacent to Purgatory Creek. In the
^invest corner of the site, an overflow condition will be provided for storm water
cage off a future parking area. When future parking area is constructed, a
basin with an outlet pipe into the Purgatory Creek should be installed to
iize erosion. Details of outlet structures should be provided for review by tie
Engineer.
:"ARV
Planning Commission could recommend one of the following alternatives.
The Commission could recommend approval of the request for rezoning from
Rural to C-Regional Service on 10.11 acres and Planned Unit Development
District Review on 17.7 acres based upon plans dated October 5, 1984,
subject to the Staff Report dated October 26, 1984, and subject to the
following conditions:
A. Prior to Council review, proponent shall modify:
1. The landscape plan to provide for berming along Prairie
a1j)J0
V
on Prairie Athletic Club 5 October 26. 1984
Center Drive and in front of the service area to screen
parking and loading facilities. In addition, increase the
berm height and plant larger coniferous trees on the north,
west, and south side of the permanent air structure.
2. Modify the northeast building elevation to include the same
ribbon window treatment on other building elevations.
3. Revise the wall sign to a 300 square foot maximum and
provide details for review.
4. Provide color samples of the bubble fabric for review.
B. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
1. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee as determined by the
Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission.
2. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in
advance of grading.
3. Provide color samples of the brick materials and wood for
review.
4. Provide lighting details for review.
C. Submit a preliminary plat for review by Commission and Council.
D. Construct sidewalk connects to Prairie Center Drive and future
trails in Purgatory Creek Recreation area.
'• The Commission could recommend that the plans be returned to the proponent
for revisions.
The Commission could recommend approval of the request as submitted.
^";uuaf
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Scrvices�
DA'!11: November 1, 1984
Sii(JCCT: Supplementary Staff Report to the October 26, 1984 Planning Staff Report
Regarding the laden Prairie Athletic Club
Although, the October 26th Planning Staff report addresses all of the Community Services
staff concerns regarding the Eden Prairie Athletic Club, Community Services staff feel
that it is important to emphasize several concerns regarding this proposal.
'!'hc Community Services staff believe that in Athletic Club, located adjacent to the
proposed primary access to the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area, would be an excellent
lend use and would compliment the types of activities the City would encourage in that
area. The Community Services staff believe that this proposal Would have had a much
Letter relationship faith the proposed entrance if it had been proposed on the site to
the north (Teman's site) rather than the existing site; mainly, because the activity
area would have opened up onto the park entry plaza. As it is proposed, the back side
of the building will abut the proposed park entry plaza. The proposal cannot be flip
flopped (tile to sun orientation on the outdoor activities; however, with proper land-
";Ting and a well planned joint entry nt Single Tree Lane this development can still
work quite nicely with the proposed entry plaza.
tI,(- main concerns Community Services staff have with the proposal itself are the
owing:
1. Screening of parking and the air structures
2. 'frail ownership and connections
3. TTte color of both air structures
4. Land Dedication
i NI N(1/I AN'DSCAPl NG
Community Services staff concur with the Planning Staff Report of October 26; that
imporlant to reduce the mass of the air structure by the development of high berms
1, r!;e coniferous plantings. \,Ot only' is screening; imliorrnnt from the north :uui
'hcaat, but also from the west protecting the views from the Purgatory Creek Recre,
Area. The Couu;uutity Services staff would request a recommendation from the Parks,
rcat.ion and Natural Resources Commission that would direct staff to work with the
toper on a screening plan based on the Planning Staff recommendations.
Tt+All, tn;Nl!1tSllil`/('ONNI'C,'f10N5
:V blctic Club site plan depicts a "future hikinc;/bicycle trail" on the west side of
tLe team:: court:: and air structures; this is in the location of the trail depictcL on
tP,c n!q,rnrrd Alastcr Plan for the 1'url;ator) Crock Recreation Area. Ito Community Services
t.tff w,,uld recntan:cnd deal this trail be c•on;irurted prier to tic cup:utcy permit, an.l that'.
it he ti' wide Willi all aglimc surfacr. 'iltc Comuumtity sorvicer: staff rc•cogniac that this
trail t;utt: uouchcre and goys nowhere at this little, however, staff feels dual it i.
7 at�l 1
_2-
curt to require these trail sections be constructed and in place during the
ruction of all of the development that will occur adjacent to the Purgatory Creek
Itiun Arca. the trails should be constructed by the owner of the site while the
is being developed to eliminate problems with trail placement in the future and
cure that the trail will be constructed. The City should also require a 10, wide
walkway easement in the location of the troll to ensure public use of that trail.
final location of the trail should he approved by the Director of Community Services,
nJ the trail should connect from the southern boundary to the northern boundary of the
propcily.
The community Services staff, at this time, recommends an aglime surface 8' wide and
0' deep. Although, in the future, this trail may be a hard surface trail, staff would
rcc.maniatd an aglime surface until the majority of the trail is constructed around the
recreation area. An aglime surface is an excellent surface for jogging and walking and
can be maintained with relatively little maintenance.
Alit STRUCTURE COLOR
lipm, visual inspection of many of the existing air structures in the metro area that are
white, silver or cream colored, those structures appear to be rather clingy or dirty much
of the time. The Community Services staff have recommended that the developer consider
adding a color to the air structures that would help hide the dirty visual appearance
of the typical air structures. The developer has indicated that they are able to order
a dyc(i material; however, it is unlikely that they are able to have the structure dyed
with a graduated color scheme as is proposed in the October 26th Planning Staff Report.
'fhe community Services staff concur with the Planning Staff Report regarding the recom-
n.cndation that prior to Council review the proponent provide color samples of the bubble
fabric for review.
[AND DYDICATION
"h" proponent will be required to pay the cash park fee on the 10.11 acres that is being
-pun d to C-Regional Service. 'ihe piaster i'}an for tl(c Purgatory Creek Recreation Area
onln,ends that the City accept cash park fees on the developed land and suggests that
t .a.ic point the developer donate floodplain property to the City for the development
— il;e recreation area. The proponent may wish to wait until some future date to donate
floodplain property so that it is clear the dedication of that property is a gift
the City and not required by this rezoning process.
(om:nunity Services Department recommend:; approva? of the laden Prairie Athletic Club
d on the },lasts dated October 5, 1984, and subject to the staff report of October
-;i and the additional recou;mMidations listed in this November 1, 1984 Community
viirs Staff Report.
C= ,unutity Services staff also wish to point out that the development of this site
nposed will require a realigiuuent of the proposed entry plaza and access to the
•:.:tort' Crce}: Recreation At-ca. '1110 development of this site will encourage additional
rcl=paicnt along Prairie Center Drive in the near future, the Community Services staff
un;ly recommend that the City consider porch:isinl; ❑ mi it!mwm of 3.5 acres immediately
h of this site in order to re.tcrvc the ability to develop the entry plaza for the
P: tratury ('reek Recreation Area. 'llic entry piara, including the water sculpture, form-
n, :ral,hitheater, public pl,uca arnl parking area i:; the key focal point of the furl;atory
}. Rr.rcatiun Arc;t entd the loc';ttion of that entry pla::a at the we::t end of Sinl;le
;rcc l.anc was an impnrt;int c„nsiderot ion its the devel(,pnte»t of the Master Mau for tine
I'n'l:;;tury (:reek R,crrat ion Arca.
Planning Commission Minutes 6 October 29, 1984
D. EDEN PRAIRIE ATHLETIC CLUB, by William 0. Naegele, Trustee. Request
for Planned Unit Development District Review of 17.7 acres and
Zoning District Change from Rural to Commercial Regional Service for
10.11 acres for an Indoor-Outdoor Athletic & Fitness Center.
Location: Prairie Center Drive at Singletree Lane. A public
hearing.
Mr. Don Brauer, representing proponent, reviewed the proposed development
and site characteristics. Planner Enger reviewed the findings of the Staff
Report of October 26, 1984, with the Commission.
Mr. Brauer explained that extensive soil correction work would be necessary
for a portion of the site. In one area, excavation of eight feet of soil
y would be necessary. Mr. Brian Cluts, architect for proponents, reviewed the
exterior materials of the structure, including the "bubble" portion of the
structure and the screening of it from adjacent uses.
Mr. Brauer stated that it was preferred not to plat at this time until road
alignments for the area had been established and until the uses for the
Purgatory Creek Recreation Area had been determined adjacent to their
parcel.
(Torjesen arrived at 9:20 p.m.)
Johannes stated that it thought the area of Singletree Lane and Prairie
Center Drive was to be a gateway to the Major Center Area. He asked if this
was an appropriate use for this location. Mr. Brauer stated that it was the
opinion of proponents that this use would use the park facilities, perhaps
more than any other type of use could. fie added that proponents felt the
use would be complementary to the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area.
Planner Enger stated that Staff was concerned with the "bubble" proposed for
the structure. Berming, topped with 18-20 ft. high trees may be necessary.
The large plantings and berming were suggested to break up the appearance of
the large mass of the "bubble." Mr. Brauer stated that he would be willin,;
to work with Staff to lessen the impact of the "bubble" on surrounding
properties.
Hallett stated that he shared the concerns of Johannes regarding the area
being a gateway to the City.
Acting Chairman Schuck asked for comments and questions from members of the
audience. There were none.
Planning Commission Minutes 7 October 29, 1984
MOTION:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Hallett, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Mr. William 0. Naegele, Trustee, for
Planned Unit Development District Review of 17.7 acres and Zoning District
Change from Rural to Commercial Regional Service for 10.11 acres for an
Indoor-Outdoor Athletic and Fitness Center, based on written materials and
plans dated October 5, 1984, subject to the findings of the Staff Report
dated October 26, 1984, and subject to the condition that proponents work
with Staff to mitigate the impact of the large mass of the "bubble" portion
of the structure by additional landscaping and screening.
Motion carried--3-1-1 (Johannes against; Torjesen abstained)
Johannes stated that he was uncomfortable with the "bubble" portion of the
structure and encouraged proponents to work this out with Staff. He added
that he felt there should be a workable solution to the screening of that
portion of the structure.
2 555
V. DEVELOPt,fi1T PROPOSALS
-Edon Prairie Athletic Club
Refer to memo dated November 1, 1984 from Bob Lambert, Director of
Community Services and staff report dated October 26, 19B4.
Don Brauer was present to give a brief presentation on the
development proposal. The site is located adjacent to the entrance
of-the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area on Prairie Center Drive and
Singletrec Lane. Brauer slcowed several site plans of the proposed
athletic club. lie said the club would be primarily a tennis club
and the developer is taking advantage of the configuration ,intie
outdoor tennis courts are required to run north and south. B,,,aer
said construction of Singletree Lane began today and the schedule
for the construction of the athletic club is critical. Portions of
the parking lot and tennis courts are within the flood plain area.
Kingrey expressed concern over the screening of parking areas and
air structures from the recreation area. Brauer said mounding and
planting areas from 40' to 80'. wide would be used to screen both of
these areas.
Kingrey asked for a definition of a fast growing tree that would be
used for screening purposes. Brauer. replied that willows would
most likely be used.
Kingrey also asked what type of air structures are being considered
for this building. Brauer explained that the structures will most
likely consist of three layers.
Jessen asked the height of the bubble from the recreation area.
Brauer said it would be approximately 40'.
Jessen also asked about the location of a future hiking and bike
trail. Brauer said the trail could be located anylahere within the
site.
Brauer briefly reviewed the elevation levels of the athletic club.
Lambert asked if there were samples of the bubble color available.
Brauer said he does not have samnles'yet, but that the bubble could
be done in off white. Ile also said that eart:htones would be
preferred.
Motion: A motion was made by Kingrey to reconmcond approval of the
Eden Prairie Athletic Club per staff report with a contingency that
a one year lancls(;aping !)uarantoe is added. Breitenstein seconded the
motion and it carried.
Lambert said that if another developer comes in, the primary
entrance to t{ce recreation area will be lost. 'to suge gsts a
minimum of 3 to 3.0 acres north of the site be set aside for an
entry Plaza to be u::cd by the public.
Brauer said that Mr. Teman, who o+•:ns this land, is very agreeable
to this idca;.hoti;cwer, he reels the City should be thinkintl of a
civic site of {nvhaps 15 acres.
1',otioil:. Baker moved to ITC oemccnd that the City Council pursue the
idea that l.he City purchar,e lan(t for an entry plaza. Cook secIld d
the aucLion and it cOrriC(I-
GAFF REPORT
.10: Planning Commission
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
TiiROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: October 26, 1984
PROJECT: Bluffs East 3rd Addition
LOCATION: South of Franlo Road and Pioneer Trail
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER: The Bluffs Company
REQUEST: Zoning District Change from R1-13.5 to R1-9.5.
Background - -::-- •�I , ,The Planning Commission reviewed a
tpreliminary plat and rezoning phi. 77-39
I:.
request from the Bluffs Company last R•13 5
August. The Commission recommended
approval of a preliminary plat to
subdivide approximately nine acres
into 29 single family lots and a ` -
rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5. E PROPOSED 317E
!t:e new request for rezoning is for
primary reasons: One, the ! 1 K ' 2
., oponent contends that the higher y �•r:a
lot will demand a higher price C—
c home, meaning a larger home;
the typical lot width of 70 - C.
t in the third addition provides 81^tl 5"j
ted opportunity for housing _ -
iety because of the 25-foot total
yard setback requirements which y \
nits housing types to garage
Its designs common in the first
second addition. The proponent
,rends that a 15-foot total.
:back would allow for more housing i itiT
v:;riety and provide a transition
f -orn the R1-9.5 lots directly across ;
tho street.
�` AREA LOCA n 10 r N,AP
Esluffs East 3rd 2 October 26, 1984
Staff Analysis
When the overall Rlanned Unit Development for the Bluffs East Addition was reviewed
by the Planning Commission, Staff recommended that the land area be planned for
future R1-13.5 zoning to provide an appropriate transition between the proposed R1-
9.5 zoning and the Rural area land use to the south of the development. A rezoning
to R1-9.5 would still maintain a lot size as a transitional element, even though the
side yard setbacks might be different. The transition would occur across the rear
of the lots, south of Lee Drive, Grant Avenue, and west of Meade Lane, as opposed to
across the street. Similar building setbacks would provide for continuity between
housing on both sides of the street.
Rezoning to R1-9.5 should be conditioned on no future subdivision of lots such that
the appropriate transition can be maintained. Rezoning should also not include the
lots to the west of Meade Lane, which were platted with 90-foot street frontages.
Even with R1-13.5 setbacks, 65 feet of building area is adequate enough to provide
for housing variety. In addition, since these lots are adjacent to Purgatory Creek,
the large lot size and setbacks should be maintained.
SUMMARY
The Planning Commission may choose to recommend one of the following alternatives:
1. The Planning Commission could recommend approval of the request for rezoning
from R1-13.5 to R1-9.5 based on plans dated June 1, 1984, subject to Staff
Report dated October 26, 1984.
2. The Commission could recommend that the development plans be returned to
proponent for revisions.
3. The Commission could recommend approval of the request as submitted.
Planning Commission Minutes 7 October 29, 1984
E. BLUFFS EAST 3RD ADDITION, by the Bluffs Company. Request for Zoning
District Change from R1-13.5 to 111-9.5 for 9.63 acres for 29 single
family lots. Location: West of Franlo Road, South of Lee Drive. A
public meeting.
Staff explained that proponents were requesting a change in the zoning to
allow larger homes to be built upon the lots. The transition between zoning
districts would then take place across back lot lines, instead of across the
street from each other. Additionally, the lot sizes of this plat would not
be changed--they would remain as originally platted. Only the zoning
district designation was proposed for change.
Gartner asked why this action was requested of the Planning Commission, as
opposed to the Board of Appeals. Staff responded that, since it involved
the entire plat of 29 lots, it was felt that it would be more appropriate to
have the request reviewed by the Planning Commission, and to avoid 29
separate requests before the Board of Appeals. Also, in Staff's opinion,
the request was more of a zoning issue, than a variance issue.
Torjesen stated that he felt the purpose of the R1-9.5 District was to allow
for more moderate cost units within the community, not to allow developers
to build larger homes on smaller lots. Ile stated that it appeared as if the
111-9.5 lots were becoming the standard lot size for the community, instead
of the 111-13.5 lots. Torjesen stated that he felt this issue should be
discussed during the joint meeting with the Council and Planning Commission
in order to re-examine City policy on this matter. The other Commissioners
concurred.
Staff pointed out that the requested change would allow for the same
setbacks on both sides of the. street, as opposed to larger setbacks for the
lots to the north. This would provide for consistency in the neighborhood.
Gartner stated that she felt the reason for different setbacks was because
the larger structures in the R1-13.5 and larger lot zoning districts needed
more space between them.
re�j`j
Nanning Commission Minutes 8 October 29, 1984
Johannes asked if the City had required the mixture of unit types such that
no two similar units would be located in close proximity to each other when
the property had been rezoned from Rural to R1-13.5. Staff responded that
the City had not. Mr. Ron Dahlen, builder of the structures within the
Bluffs East area, stated that he would be willing to comply with this
requirement for the Bluffs East 3rd Addition. Johannes stated that he felt
this would provide a benefit to the City to have greater control over the
mix of units, if the property were zoned to 111-9.5.
Acting Chairman Schuck asked for comments and questions from members of the
audience. There were none.
MOTION:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Johannes, to recommend to the City
Council, approval of the request of the Bluffs Company for Zoning District
Change from R1-13.5 to 111-9.5 for 9.63 acres for 29 single family lots,
based on plans dated October 26, 1984, subject to the findings of the Staff
Report dated October 26, 1984.
Motion carried--4-1-0 (Torjesen against).
Torjesen stated he felt the City needed to re-evaluate the purposes of the
.� R1-9.5 and 111-13.5 Districts and perhaps look at changing the setbacks
within the R1-13.5 District. Gartner stated that she agreed, but that she
felt the difference in this case was that it was a transitional area.
V. OLD BUSINESS
Hallett expressed concern regarding pedestrian circulation for the proposed
elderly structure at the northeast corner of Highway #5 and County Road #4.
While the plans had not yet been presented to the City in more than concept
form, he stated that he felt the City should consider various options for
dealing with a pedestrian crossing in this area for the future. The rest of
the Commission concurred. Staff stated that there was a possibility of a
semi-four at the intersection of Main Street and County Road #4 in the
future, which would mitigate this situation. However, final decisions had
not yet been made.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
None.
VII. PLANNER'S REPORT
None.
��j�U
N7. 20,1984
1jL, dOID OUT CHECK 40.0(1
",II DEPT OF P/S MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION 4,00
lo,' ",)PKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-ELECTION SUPPLIES 31.9,'
1 JA!-!ES GERALD ALES SR REFUND IJ•111OUND FEES 30.01;
lr,',,. DANA GIBBS PACKET DELIVERY 91.00
It;'tG-i PINOCCHIO CHAPTER CHRISTMAS IDEA HOUS[-COIUILINITY SERVICES 105.0+I
16t'E.`.i SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTER INC NOVEMBER 84 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 3899.2'1
1W,'66 MINNESOTA REC & PARK ASSN CONFERENCE-COI�I.IUNITY CENTER 100.Oo
168b1 FOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-[LECTION SUPPLIES 31.31
16868 STATE OF MINNESOTA BIKE REGISTRATIONS 9.01-1
16869 PETTY CASH EXPENSES 65.17
16870 ANGELA GREEN REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 12.00
16871 PAULA WANNA REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 14.0:'
16872 JENNY BUHL REFUND-SKATING CLASSES 27.00
16873 PENNY OLSON REFUND-SKATING CLASSES 25.00
16874 JENNIFER MICHAELS REFUND-SKATING CLASSES 27.00
16875 JUSTIN FAKLAND REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 12.00
16316 RHEA SKROBER REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 12.00
16;;71 RALPH KRATOCHVIL EXERCISE INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 26.00
16818 U S POSTMASTER POSTAGE-POLICE DEPT 200.00
16879 JASON-NORTHCO PROPERTIES NOVEMBER 84 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 3757.14
16980 MENARDS 3 RDOF VENTS-PARK MAINTENANCE 13.77
I6^Rl WENOY BURNS CARLSON SKATING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 79.00
10832 PRIO' MINE CO WINE 372.97
16ft83 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 198.79
4 TalIN CITY WINE CO WINE 2018.71
PAUSTIS & SONS CO WINE 140.18
1b'1i)5 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 7629.77
IR7 OUAL11Y WIVE CO WINE 2015.09
11.,st8 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 3199.22
1t:`8f? JOHNSON BROTHERS IdtiOLESALE LIQUOR LIQUOR 3579.01
1NILRCONTINENTAL PCKG CO WINE 2468.70
1INNLSOTA R P SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER 265.00
1'1_TTY CASii-PUBLIC SAFETY DEPT EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 36.75
1TIIAaJ JUKAM REFUND-SKATING CLASSES 10.00
11!1 FLAHERTY REFUND-SKATING CLASSES 17.00
'+;!!Zl{!.RN STATES PO:JER CD SERUICE 1103.73
1i'';RAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 11/9/84 17763.12
";ISSIO`IER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 11/9/84 9221.13
P°,,;T''FNT OF F"'PLOY[[: RELATIONS PAYROLL 11/9/84 13165.20,
1NA LIFE INSURANCE CO PAYROLL 11/9/84 114.00
"' %I-SOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 11/9/8.1 35.00
C R A PAYROLL 11/9/34 15263.7Ei
l'f'AT !BEST LIFE INSURANCE CO PAYROLL 11/9/84 4266.0i
TI. UNION OF OPERATING ENG DUES 689.85
14AY OF MINNEAPOLIS PAYROLL 11/9/84 108.75
"S1CIJNS 11CALTH PLAN INSURANCE 11619.R7
HEALTH PLAN INC INSURANCE 2019.7(•
,,:_NTERS HEALTH PI AN INC INStJ",ANCF. 5130.10
?' `°•` 1;.RN LIFE INSURANCE CO INSURANCE; 767.9'S
VOLLEI'RAI.1. & OPEN GYM OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 160.0o
?E F,"�;IR!:P;DO'tFF SERVICE-FIR[ DE PT 630.0n
i il!1-1? b!{Il1!.f:SALFI,S INC BEER 4470.4'. `
li"1I Cf 1Y CLU,t 0114,1 1RUTING CO BEER 814L.'`
16913 fN'A COLA POTTLING CO MIXES 558:It
12631116
16 0,Y DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 3191.7
iAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER 5549.0
+ . fMIGGS BEER DIST INC BEER 4124.1,
16'?11 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 251.1."
1f`i1.5 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO MIXES 473.8',
1))19 REX DISTRIBUTING CO INC BEER 325.0.
IW))", ROYAL CROWN BEVERAGE CO MIXES 86.1.'
169Zi. THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 9253.8,
16922 JANELLE ANDERSON ELECTION JUDGE 24.00
16923 NIKKI ANDERSON WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.00
169?l RITA ANDERSON WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.0r
16975 DEBBIE ATTIG WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 44.0c
1G926 JOAN S BARTH WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 66.01'
16927 LEONE BARTA WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 68.01'
16928 BERNADINE BEAUVAIS WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 70.00
16929 PAM BEAUVAIS WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 32.00
16910 GARBARA BERGAN WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 68.00
16931 PATRICIA BERLINGER WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 68.0('
16932 ADELINE M BRAMWELL WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 82.0
16933 LYNN BRAMWELL WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 28.00
16934 JEANNE BRANDT WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 82.00
16935 JOY BREKKE WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.0'
16936 CHERYL BRIDGE WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 70.0:
16937 RO"ERTA BRONSON WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 68.00
16933 SHARON BUNTIN WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 68.00
1r939 CAROL J BURNETT WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 70.0C,
i40 DAWN BUSCH WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 68.011;
1t,g41 RARBARA G CAIL WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 68.00
16912 LINDA J CAMPBELL WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.0i?
16943 GRACE B CARMODY WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 68.00
10 9,11 ANN CHEATHAM WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 40.00
IF�r!l, MILDRED II CLARK WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 62.0k:
16,116 1.01,11SE J DOUGHTY WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 70.0::
1(=- ! NANCY DOWNEY WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.00
opt ^„1RY F_ FAHRENKROG WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.0C'
b,)ROTHY FITZGERALD WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.0c'
PiRRY FORSTER WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 32.00 .
THELMA FRICKE WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 66.0;,
W:TTY FRITZ 14AGES-ELECTION JUDGE 66.0C;
1;r1RLAN D FRITZ WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 70.0c
' VIC(',INIA K GARTNER WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 66.0,:
.ii't'll' 111SON WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 76.0':'
('HiRYL GLISCZINSKI WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 116.C`
C,. ,DYS GR,9�;NES WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 70.0::
Ci;LI;YL HANSEN WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.0n
H WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 70.0�'
�LEt, IIAU�T WAGES-ELECTION] JUDGE 68.00 '
F R HAW"KINS 70.Oi
Gl C'.ROL 11EGGF. WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE
B HELFAND WAGES-ELECTIONS JUDGE 66.0" '
1(63 A-ITE 1.01;RIE HILL WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 150.0f?
1164 C I. HILL JR WAGES-ELECTIO`7 JUDGE. 34.0,
`W G'"NiCC. M 11OLASEK WAGES-ELECTION JiIDCE 72.0�
I AIl!NC HOOKAM WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 80.0,'
32.0
1L9;;7 Ij,18ELL J IVERSON WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE "
7631S:'4
1( ' CLAINE M lACQUES WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 74.0i
1(: RILL JELLISON WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 68.C'
'ii{IRLEY JELLISON WAGES-ELC.CTI(LI JUDGE 84.L'
LINDA JIRAN WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 112.0
)OR1S JOHNSON WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 82.0
i VIOLA M JOHNSON WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 66.0,
1wi LYLE J JOHMSTON WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.01
1.6971 PAULINE JOHNSTON WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 70.0
1L;'!76 JEAN A JONES WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 70.0l
10971 PATTY JONES WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 32.0L
1697tt SUE KELLER WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.Or
16979 DELORES KLEIN WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 68.(
16980 JUDY K0BER WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 28.0'
16981 i•1ARGARET R KRUGER WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 30.0,
1699? SUZANNE K LANE WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 78.0
16983 JUDITH A LEHMAN WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.0�
16934 ADELINE L LEVIN WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 66.0`
16985 ELEANOR LEVINE WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 70.0:
169�'S GEORGE-ANN LILLIE WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 84.0,`'
16937 NANCY LITTLE. WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 68.00
16988 MARILYN I LUNDEEN WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 68.0
16989 VIOLA MCLAIN WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 68.00
16990 WILLIAM D MCNEIL WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 66.Oc
16991 JUDY MILLER WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 66.0
16992. ROTH H M1TAL WAGES-FLFCTION JUDGE 70.0C
1699; NIARTI MULLEN WAGES-ELECTION Jt)DGE 28.0`
16994 JOYCE M MYHRE WAGES.-ELECTION JUDGE 66.0,
�4995 PATRICIA A NASH WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 68.00
<16 ALFRED L NELSON WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 66.0(
'PM97 CAROLINE NELSON 14AGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.0C�
100E M:IRION L NESBITT WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 78.0'
if,""9 SHARON NOLTE WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 98.0v
1 RUTH OLSON WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 68.O+1
l;cr' JAMES RANNOW WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 74.UC,
1''`<'-' JEAN P,EICHtRJ WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.00
1_AURINA REIFF WAGES-ELECTION JJOGE 70.0'
ROSE MARIE RIPKA WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 68.0"
'- LEILA C SEIFERT WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 32.0'10
;.LICE SMITH WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 68.OL
SFTTY SCHAITSERGER WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.0"'
PDROTHY SCHWARTZ WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 66.0:,
IiALTLR E THOMPSON WAGES-FLECTION JUDGE 32.0�'
1OWAL THOMAS WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.0::
:UTH L TRAASETH WAGES-11FCTION JUDGE 70.
F G
C:\YNE ft TRA1SETH WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.0r
i;VO!;ltE TREPTOW WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.0!`
fIAiNE UOSTUEN WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 70.&
"ARY UPTON WAGFS-FLFCTION JUDGE 66.DF.
ILAINF. WL-DEL WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 40.0,'
9A!1LEt;E t•!f GNER
WAGES-FLC.CTION JUDGE 72.00
IcNIFER JOAN IdFDERSKI WAGES-ELECTION 1110GE 72.(x
I f'ARIE Wi7TEN131-RG WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.(U
p ';`--�, �1"J2GIE t;OODHOtISE WAGES-ELECTION JUDi;E 7
10 ANN WRONSKI WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 72.('0:�
'
3�,'600
CECIL 11 VIY14AN WAGES-ELECTION JUDGE 70.0,' '
JOSEPHINE 7ALUSKY WAGES-FLFCTION JUDGE 36.1'
THOS1 J ZALUSKY WAGES-FLECTION JUDGE 70.(`
HLRBERI S ADOLPHSON EXPENSES-BUILDING DEPT 10.!'
1 AMERICAN LININ SUPPLY CO SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE S.:'
i AMCRICAN NATIONAL BANK SERVICE 50.0
1.7 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BOND PAYMENT 167815.1'
1/0:2:' AMFRICAN PLAN:ZING ASSOC DUES-PLANNING C0*1ISSIONERS 210.0
1703U *IERICAN PLANTING ASSOC BOOK-PLANNING DEPT 19.('
110:31 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC FILM RENTAL-HATER DEPT 295.0.
17031 AMI PRODUCTS INC HOSE/HOSE COUPLING-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 93.2
17033 RON ANDERSON EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 35.3
17034 APARTMENT CONDO GUIDE BOOK-ASSESSING OEPT 1.0,
17035 DALE ARNDT OCTOBER 84 CUSTODIAL SERVICE 200.0
17036 ASPLUND COFFEE CO INC COFFEE-CONCESSION STAND-COMMUNITY CENTER 121.t'
17037 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC BLACKTOP 728.8.
17033 ASTLEFORD INTNL INC WIPER MOTOR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 72.0
17039 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 50.4
17040 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS NDVEMBER 84 SERVICE 872.6,
17041 AUTO-HDWE WAREHOUSE CO INSTALL 6 DECK LIGHTS-FIRE DEPT 246.E
17042 BERGIN AUTO BOOY REPAIR SQUAD CAR 2448.8:
17043 BEST & FLANAGAN LEGAL SERVICE-EOEN ROAD 300.0:
170114 BLOOb1INGTON LOCKSMITH CO KEYS-WATER DEPT 105.01'
17045 LOIS BOETTCHER MINUTES FOR PARK & REC COMMISSION MTG 67.5'
17046 BRAUN ENG TESTING INC SERVICE-CARMEL ADDN/PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 2507.S,
17047 RROtI^I PHOTO FILM PROCESSING 100.31:
1704E BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC ROCK 4804.8'
0^, i;StJ CORP TENNIS NETS-PARK MAINTENANCE 173.3'
. 050 BUSINESS FURNITURE INC CHAIR-BUILDING DEPT 213.9:
1 n 1 2,!ITCHS BAR SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 252.1C
I "• CHF:MLAWN TREE & SHRUB PRIINING-POLICE & WATER DEPT 375.0
('ARDOX CORP CARBON OIOXIOF-WATER DEPT 771.7
CARGiLL SALT DIVISION DEICING SALT-STREET DEPT 2196.6.
-ArLSON & CARLSON ASSOC SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 680.0
CARLSON THERMOPLASTICS VALVE SOCKET/ADAPTER-WATER DEPT 15.6'.
CHANHASSEN BUMPER TO BUMPER -AWTIFREEZE/OIL. FILTERS/BELTS/PLUG WIRES/ 2334.8
-HOSES/MINI LAMPS/BRAKE SHOES/FUEL PUMP/OIL
-WRENCH/VALVFS/SPARK PLUGS/AIR FILTERS/DISC
PADS/FITTIIJGS/MIRROR/SWITCH/BEARINGS
Cii1' OF CHANHASSEN SERVICE 1684.7?
t'!IANIIASSEN LAWN & SPORTS CHAIN SAW-FORESTRY DEPT 230.0`'
:I UTC11 & tl-JOINT BURNSVILLE INC BEA!tl%'GS/GEARS/SIIAFT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 585.2,
"TINENI'AL BANK BOND PAYMENT 77512.C.
'U;;;b1Y FIRE & SAFETY INC DRY CHEMICALS-FIRE. DEPT 122.0
il;'Y EQUrPMF.NT INC PEN PDINT-ENG DEPT/CHAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 260.".
O;!`,'TRY CLUB MARKET INC SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 100.f,'
' RUB!;ER STAMP CO DESK SIGN-POLICE DEPT 7.3`
iLI'R t'A;NER CO QUICKLIME-W.ATLR DEPT 2727.'"
ZD F DAH'BERG N0VEMBER 84 EXPENSES 80.t'•
i'•'•LCO CLEANING SUPPLIES 99.1
I Kli NE DIETZ OCTOBER 84 EXPENSES 175.0-
;t!; DOLE. BOOTS-ANIMAi. CO'ITROI. 7.ti
Ir ;'('C. ENDENT SCHOOL. DIST #272 OCTOBER 84 CUS1O0IAL SERVICE 2065.(.
[DiAl PRAIRIE TRASHTRONICS OCTOBER 84 TRASH PICKUP 315.('-
1" " CITY OF EDINA OCTOBER 84 TESTS-WATER DEPT 106.(',
1,, - ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS MANHOLE RINGS-DRAINAGE DEPT 619.5`
1, I.LVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC RAINCOAT-STREET DEPT 25.,'
l FFREY ELWELL MILEAGE-COf:'-IU'IITY CENTER 22.%
IINLEY BROS ENTERPRISES HOCKEY GATES/RING FABRIC-FOREST HILLS 619.0
17'.u:; JAN FLYNN SEPTEMBER & OCTOBER MILEAGE 121.�'
11 ! G & K SERVICES TOWELS/JACKETS-WATER DEPT 86.7
170'lti G L CONTRACTING INC -REPAIR STREET & WATER SYSTEM-PORTAL DRIVE 2423.E
AND HERITAGE DRIVE
170S', GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC RADIO REAPIR & PARTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 43.7.
1708 GLE14 LAKE BAKERY INC ELECTION SUPPLIES 67.9
17083 GLIDDEN PAINT PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE 102.0'
170a4 GOPHER SIGN CO 2 DRIVING CAPS-VIATER OEPT 54.9.
17025 DALE GREEN CO BLACK DIRT 63.('
170"5 GREENKEEPER INC WINTERIZE LAWA IRRIGATION-P/S BUILDING 50.(`
I7087 HACH CO REPAIR EQUIPMENT-WATER DEPT 52.0
1701t JACK HACKING EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 210.7f'
17039 HARM,ON GLASS WINDSHIELD-ANIMAL WAROEN 203.0
17090 Hi'NNEPIN COUNTY SEPTEMBER 84 BOARDING OF PRISONERS 3139."
17091 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER EQUIP14ENT RENTAL-FORESTRY DEPT 6201.G,
17092 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER OXYGEN-PARK MAINTENANCE 58.5"
17093 14OFF PLUMBING INC PUMP SEPTIC SYSTEM-SENIOR CENTER 470.0,
17094 HOPKINS DODGE SALES INC CABLE/VALVE/HEATER CONTROL-EQUIPMENT MAINT 80.5,
17095 H02tiITZ INC REPAIR WATER LEAK IN JAIL 40.5:
17095 HOTSY EQUIPMENT CO PLUG/SOCKET/O RINGS-SEWER DEPT 33.8
17097 IMI RESEARCH CORP COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT `URVEY 1075.C:
1709R INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC CANON COPIER-WATER DEPT 499.0:
17099 JPCI;SON-HIRSH INC LAMINATOR EQUIPMENT-WATER DEPT 404.5:
100 GS13 DEVELOPMENT INC REFUND OF STATE IRB 27500.0
7101 JM OFFICE. PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-WATER & FIRE DEPT 316.7•
17102 TED JOHNSON OPEN GYM OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 75.0
17103 CARL JULLIE EXPENSES 133.3
1/104 KARULF HARDWARE INC -PAINT BRUSHES/MULTIPLE OUTLET/WIRE/CABLE/ 730. ` •,
-BOOSTER CABLES/HANDLES/PIPE/BATTERY/KEYS/
-PLASTIC SHEETING/STRING/SOLDER/HAND
-CLEANER/BELTS/LIGIIT BULBS/GLUE PEN/GLUE
CONCRETE. MIX/FLOOR ENAMEL/CIRCUIT BREAKER/
-FILTERS/TOIIELS HAMMER/WASHERS/ELECTRICAL
TAPE/RODS/RIVETS/HOOKS/CHISEL/SHOVELS
RAY KERBER STRAW BALES-DRAINAGE DEPT 60.0
Kr1KESH ATHLETIC SUPPLIES INC BROOMBAI.L/VOLLEYBALL SUPPLIES 247.t,
:RAEMFRS HOME CENTER PAINT/ROLLERS/GLOVES/ANCHORS/NAILS 249.E
''OID OUl CHFCK 0.0•,
I-AH CLAIRE COUNTY WITHHOLDING FROM EMPLOYEE PER COURT ORDER 3.0
i' „VID l;Rf.E>if.R VOLI.FYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 20.0
1I1 1;06ERT LAMBERT NOVEMBER 84 EXPENSES 228.0
I:l'? I.ANCE SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 9•�
17113 LANE INSURANCE I M C AUTO INSURANCE 386.0
1i1" LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD SEPTEMBER 84 LEGAL SERVICE 11195."
1711 LLEF BROS INC COVERAII.S/RIIF:S/DUSTt'OPS 546.1,
1/Ilt, LONG,, I_N:E FORD TRACTCR CLIPS/LINKS/BLADES-PARK MAINTENANCE 121•ti
17117 BARBARA MATTSON Sl•1114MING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 130.E
711`'• MATTS AUTO SERVICE INC TOWING SERVICE 49.,,
'1111 'd:TROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM DECEMBER 84 SEWER SERVICE 58910. ,
11778',59
171'. '110LAND PRODUCTS CO CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 250.7.E
1?'s %!%-JEST ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP 1845.1,'
;;NNESOTA COMMIUNICATIONS CORP PAGER RENTAL-EATER DEPT 25.7'
'!INNESOTA BAR SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 247.1'
1T< tdE'ENESOTA GAS CO SERVICE 4089.
111i5 'J01D OUT CHECK , O.oe�
II1;'C MINNESOTA RFC & PARK ASSOC VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL REGIST/FFES PAID 520.O'
I!!77 PIINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC, EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER 85.5i'
171?2 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP SERVICE 36.2!
171�9 MODERN TIRE CO WHEEL ALIGNMENT/BALANCE WHEELS 110.&
11U0 MODERN ELECTRIC REPAIR MOTOR-PARK MAINTENANCE 26.51'
17131 MOTOROLA INC DUAL CALL PAGERS-FIRE DEPT 770.0'`
1713? W,'l MUELLER & SONS INC SAND 7207.1'
17133 biTl DISTRIBUTING CO TUNE-UP KIT/REPAIR DISTRIBUTOR-PARK DEPT 144.t'
17134 MY CHEESE SHOP ELECFION EXPENSES 512.4.
17135 MCFARLANES INC CONCRETE-DRAINAGE 126.0.
17136 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC BODK-FIRE DEPT 44.7
17137 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 5.1Y
17135 NO,JIIIWE STERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 3266.72
17139 NORWEST BANK MINNEAPOLIS NA BOND PAYMENTS 156566.C:
17110 CURT OBERLANDER EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 68.1-,
17141 THOMAS 0 BRIEN EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT 15.5!
17142 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC COMPUTERS 13876.S,
17113 SHELLY DLSON TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES-SUMMER PROGRAM 7.2�
17144 STEEE QLSTAD MILEAGE 19.6G
1%145 t-" G PEARSON INC SAND-STRFET DEPT 11.6
171116 PFPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO POP FOR CONCESSION STAND-COMMUNITY CENTER 201.2_
141 CONNTE L PETERS MILEAGE 13.2.11.5"
;f14R PHOTO QUICK FILM-POLICE DEPT
17149 VOID OUT CHECK 0.0r:
171510 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC LAMPS-COM`,AUNITY CE14TER 586.7
17151 PRIOR LAKE AGGREGATE INC SAND-PARK MAINTENANCE 127.5t: ;
171',? PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING FORMS-COMMUNITY CENTER II9.
1 1 PREMIUM SEED CO GRASS SEED-PARK MAINTENANCE 33.7i
1;'," R & R SPECIALTIES INC SHARPEN ZANBONI BLADES-COMMUNITY CENTER 79.`')'
RF.CREO"TICS CORP PIN-COMMUNITY CENTER 33.E
G RIDGE (BOOR SALES CO OF MN INC CABLE-FIRE STATION 111.0
RIEKE•CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC -SFRVICF-LAVONNE IND PARK/FLYING CLOUD DR/ 19061.2
-NORSEMAN IND PARK/ROWLAND ROAD FEASIBILITY/
PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE
";ARFN RINTA VOLLEYBALL OFFT.CIAL/FEES PAID 40.0('
R03CRS SERVICE CO REPAIR ALTERNATOR-POLICE DEPT 53.3
ST REGIS CORP STEEL POSTS-PARK P14INTENANCE 273.7•'
IdAYNE R SANDERS FEE-RUILDIN, DEPT 10.0'
SFARS ROEBtECK & CO STEP LADDER-.ATHLETIC COORDINATOR 79•°
`.;IIA!:OPEE FORD INC CAR BURATOR/S',IITC'I!/Rl!STPROOFING 448•`'
TI'F SKETCH PAD ELECTION SUPPLIES 32.0
E RFAI. SLATE CO 4 PART ITIONS-CO1d:4t1NITY SERVICES 1850.1
6! GORDON SMITH CO -CHOKE/DISTRIBUTOR/DASHER FLUID/HORN RELAY 21II."
ANTIFREEZE/FITTINGS
17 SOUTIRTEST SUBURBAN PUBLISEI INC ADS-LIQUOR STORES 252•il` '
SOUTH;:(-ST SUB!IRBAN P[11 1SH INC F.MPLOYFiENT ADS-C,OM'•1l1NTTY CENTER 37.c
SOIElH:1FtiT SIIBUi; ,1N PUBLISH INC. OCTOBCR R4 LEGAL ADS 740.;
1�1,o STS COr;SULTANTS LTD SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW ROAD & HWY I494 233.1
215:)ZO?0
171 ULLIVANS SERVICES INC PUMP TANK AT RESEARCH ROAD 5O.00
SUPPLE•E ENTERPRISES INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR SOTRES 10.?
:t iHORtJBEt ELECTION SYSTEMS FREIGHT CHARGES-ELECTION EQUIPMENT 25.0"
I71?r TIERIEY BROTHERS INC KROY TAPE-PARK PLANNING go.,,.
171'6 TRACY OIL CO INC UNLEADED GAS-STREET DEPT 8400.0.
17176 UJIFORPIS UNLIMITED NAM,ETAGS/HELMET/CAPS/PARKA 489.5t'
11117 UNITED LABDRATORIES INC CHEMICALS-i.ATER.DEPT 433.'1'
1717G UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC BOLTS & NUTS/WASHERS-PARK MAINTENANCE 14j,4
17119 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE INC GAS CYLINDERS-CON-luNITY CENTER 483.Oi
171.80 VAN WATERS & ROGERS CHLORNIE-WATER DEPT
171i31 VICOM INCDRPORATED TELEPHONE REARRANGEMENT-COMMUNITY CENTER 1636.8?
17182 REBECCA WARNER MILEAGE 21.7
17183 WATER PRODUCTS CO -LEAD SEALS/HORNS $1912.50/CURB BOX/METER 4776.7
GASKETS/METER WRENCH/CDUPLING SLEEVE 237.5:
17184 WEST CENTRAL INDUSTRIES INC LATHS-ENG DEPT
17185 WHOLESALE LIGHTING INC LIGHT BULBS-WATER DEPT 163.65 20.
17186 WILSON TANNER INCENTIVES SERVICECHTS-FIRE DEPT 272 2'
17187 XEROX CORP 28884.0;
17188 BROWN & CRIS INC SERVICE-CARMEL ADDN
17189 MINNKOTA EXCAVATING INC SERVICE-CARDINAL CREEK 3RD ADDITION 6167.8:
17190 RICHARD KNUTSON INC SERVICE-ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY 108464.9.
17191 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO SERVICE-NORSEMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 165973.9:
17192 OPUS CORPDRATION SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD DRIVE 134785.4'
17193 SHAFER CONTRACTING INC SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 82168.1.
17194 SHAFER CONTRACTING INC SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 341008.47,
1,120663. $1647597.72
l
Nr vctc;:er 20, 1984
Ca h disbursements by Fund number
10 GENERAL 185800.54
11 CE11-1*1'IFICATE OF INDEBT 894.00
12 CERTIFICATE DEBT FUND 77512.50
15 L/S PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL 39516.74
17 L/S PRESERVE 27490.57
31 PARK ACLU I ST &e DEVELOP 702.30
3- UTILITY BOND FUND 23.87
36 P/S & P/W BOND FUND 35.38
44 UTILITY DEBT FUND 156573.25
45 UTILITY DEBT FUND ARB 139527.11
51 IMPROV CONST FUND 463945.92
52 IMPROVE DEBT FUND 42.75
.7 IMPROV DEBT FUND ARB 28288.25
73 14ATER FUND 13675.93
77 SEWER FUND 59024.58
TRUST & ESCROW FUND 27765.00
> COMMUNITY DEVELOP BLOCK G 470.00
S'O TAX INCREMENT CONST FUND 426319.03
$1647597.72
•
2Q
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
THROUGH: CARL JULLIE, CITY MANAGER
FROM: ROGER A. PAULY, CITY ATTORNEY
SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE IMPOSING A FEE FOR THE DISPOSAL
OF SOLID WASTE, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1985
DATE: NOVEMBER 12, 1984
------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to request, I have drafted and am submitting
for consideration by the Council, the above-referenced
ordinance. By authority granted to the City by Laws 1984,
Chapter 644, the City may impose, effective January 1, 1985,
upon operators of facilities for mixed municipal solid waste,
a fee of fifteen cents per cubic yard of solid waste accepted
and disposed of in such facility. An exception as to the
effective date of imposing the fee for the disposal of solid
waste from metal casting facilities is provided in that such
fee may not be imposed prior to January 1, 1988. The
definitions of mixed municipal solid waste and solid waste
are taken verbatim from Minnesota Statutes. The exemption
provided in Section 1, subd. 5, is required by Chapter 644.
RAP:cw
i
ORDINANCE NO. 126-84
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING
CITY CODE CHAPTER 5 BY ADDIh]G THERETO SEC. 5.71, IMPOSING A
FEE UPON OPERATORS OF FACILITIES FOR MIXED MUNICIPAL SOLID
WASTE; AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SEC-
TION 5.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS:
THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. City Code Chapter 5 shall be and is amended
by adding thereto Sec. 5.71 as follows:
SEC. 5.71. FEES IMPOSED UPON OPERATORS OF FACILITIES
FOR MIXED MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE.
Subd. 1. Definitions--The following terms, as
used in this Section, shall have the meanings stated below:
A. "Mixed municipal solid waste" means
garbage, refuse, and other solid waste from residential, com-
mercial, industrial, and community activities which is
generated and collected in aggregate, but does not include
auto hulks, street sweepings, ash, construction debris, mining
waste, sludges, tree and agricultural wastes, tires, and
other materials collected, processed, and disposed of as
separate waste streams-
B. "Solid waste" means garbage, refuse,
sludge from a water supply treatment plant or air contaminant
treatment facility, and other discarded waste materials and
sludges, in solid, semi-solid, liquid, or contained gaseous
form, resulting from industrial, commercial, mining, and
agricultural operations, and from conununity activities, but
does not include hazardous waste; animal waste used as ferti-
lizer; earthen fill, boulders, rock; sewage sludge; solid or
dissolved material in domestic sewage or other common pollut-
ants in water resources, such as salt, dissolved or suspended
solids in industrial waste water effluents or discharges which
are point sources subject to permits under section 402 of the
federal water pollution control act, as amended, dissolved
materials in irrigation return flows; or source, special
nuclear, or by-product material as defined by The Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
Subd. 2. Pursuant to authority granted to the
City by Laws 1984, Chapter 644, Section 47 (M.S.§ 115A.921) ,
there is hereby imposed, effective January 1, 1985, upon
operators of facilities for mixed municipal solid waste
located within the City, a fee of fifteen cents per cubic
yard, or its equivalent, of solid waste accepted and disposed
of on land within the City.
Subd. 3. An operator shall maintain records
from and after January 1, 1985, of each cubic yard, or its
equivalent, of solid waste accepted and disposed of in or
on land comprising or a part of such operator's facility for
mixed municipal solid waste. Such records shall be made
reasonably available for inspection, from time to time, by
representatives of the City.
Subd. 4. An operator shall pay the fee
imposed hereby to the City no later than twenty days after
the end of each calendar month. r-ich such payment shall be
-n2- l
determined by multiplying fifteen cents times the number of
cubic yards, or their equivalent, of solid waste accepted
and disposed of in or on land comprising or a part of the
operator's facility for mixed municipal solid waste during
the calendar month for which payment is determined. Each
payment to the City shall be accompanied by a statement or
certificate signed by the operator personally, or if the
operator is a corporation, by its Chief Financial Officer,
setting forth the number of cubic yards of solid waste, or
its equivalent, accepted and disposed of in or on land
comprising or a part of the operator's facility for mixed
municipal waste during the calendar month for which payment
is made.
Subd. 5. Waste resiEue from energy and
resource recovery facilities at which solid waste is proc-
essed for the purpose of extracting, reducing, converting
to energy, or otherwise separating and preparing solid
waste for re-use shall be exempt from one-half the amount
of the fee imposed hereby, if there is at least an eighty-
five percent volume reduction in the solid waste processed.
Before any fee is reduced, the verification procedures of
M.S.§ 473.843, subd. 1(c) , must be followed and submitted
to the City.
Subd. 6. The revenue from the fees imposed
hereby shall be placed in the City's general fund for pur-
poses of mitigating and compensating for the City's risks,
costs, and other adverse effects of facilities for mixed
municipal solid waste located in the City.
-3- ;.;)")9
Subd. 7. Notwithstanding any other provision
of this section, an operator shall deduct from the fee imposed,
any part thereof attributable to the disposal, prior to
January 1, 1988, of non-hazardous solid waste from metal
casting facilities. The records required to be maintained
pursuant to subd. 3 hereof and the statement or certificate
accompanying each payment pursuant to subd. 4 hereof shall
indicate the number of cubic yards, or its equivalent, of
non-hazardous solid waste from metal casting facilities.
Section 2. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General
Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City
Code Including Penalty for Violation," and Section 5.99,
entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor," are hereby adopted in
their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim
herein.
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from
and after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of
Eden Prairie on the day of
1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at
a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the
day of 1984.
ATTEST:
City Cler Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
1984.
-4- r-' 1,2)
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John Frane
DATE: November 15, 1984
RE: Final Resolution for Computer Depot Project
$3,400,000 - Resolution 84-305
RE: Final Resolution for Edenvale II Apartments
Project $2,750,000 - Resolution 84-307
The city attorneys office has reviewed and approved the final
documents. Resolutions 84-305 and 84-307 will be in the Mayor's
signature file.
�ti 11f
Mr. INNikgIo,, E. Reuter
,. aj £lacI Maple Drive
Eden Pr ,irie, Mn. .`b-344
941-8444
Mayor Penze,l
City of Eden Pr-ai ri e
Pear Maryor Ferrel:
I arm a reAdont of Eden Prairie and I have r.ontracted with a
private refuse hauler to Pict up my weekly refuse. They are
]i=•cc?r+srd to pick: cep refuse in Eden Prairie. Pam of their
prcu_rarm is the 1_uuvieiun of a 4i+ gallon pl istic container which
is pict::ed up mechanically. in going through the Eden Prairie City
Code, I fucurd that this cunteiner is not legal.
The code currently reads: "It is unlawful for any pErs;on to
store re•f nve on resi dent i al dr:e1 l i ng premises owned or occupied
Ley him, for noore than or+e r,eel:. All such storage shall be in five
to thirty gallon metal or plartic containers with tight-fitting
r.r1ver5, wlIIch c-hall he maintainrzd in a clean and sanit.ary
condit.ion; piovidod, that tree leaves, weeds and grass +_lippings
Loy be elc,rod in plastic- bag nd Lrve limbs must be stared in
burxll r - woi gh i ng no more than seventy-five pounds and no l I�nger-
than for.rr {,-eL. "
+ /:•qr+c•-;t that rcuucil +.har+i;e 1.tcI-iOr, 9.(.11 Subd. (0) to read as
f 01 1 caw==:
•111 1E; LINI_0111-UL FOR AN,' I'E"f:S(7� it) aTCIF'k= F:FFLISE ON FESIDENTIAL
UM LINu F•IaMTSF'3 OWNED (.a PCF'I.II-•1ED PY HIM, FOk NAN MAN ONE
N1 UI*. j1i_I_ :;Ill:l{ fOfull F c!{ALl- 1+F IN FIVE. TCI iF17hT`f CAL.1_LIN ML1"At_
Uf, f L.;1S11C t'ON1,:1IA RS WTF{ TI(:ilIl-I'I FT11JG COVERS I SuCFI REFtI-_A:
11!i F•I(I L-1) LIF' IIY A M(1rJUAl. ME II{1711); OR I N A 1+0 GAt-1_ON
LrINI('+11,41,R N111-1 A E'i.:RMANI_NILY (;11 :HE)I H1116FA) LIP IF SUCH
RCFtI-A- CC1N1(;1r,II.R 1S 1'lC'1'ED up UY A SEMI-MEMANIZED OR MECHAN1:F11
PI:_llfl)Lr, L 11Hl:{ C11.. WNIL'.l{ SNGI_L. Cct.: MfirlhlTr' INFD 1N A CtE:AN (:ND
;h11Te1F:Y I (INDI1lON; fFtOVIDFD, THAT 1NLE LIIAVFB, WELDS AND U06S
yr f'I ]I'1'1NLl;: I^(11 1r1 IOkEI: IN PLASIIf' U of,S hrJD 1, _U I IMlr6 MLIS1 )IF
t1U Mi'!A- 1 H(',N 1 WFN I Y i 1 VE F'fll INDS AND No
1_014 ER TI-IiIN FLION FELT."
Thonl- you fcir- your coris,ideration of this mat:ter.
kes-pect.+ally,
CC� ✓�i�C�
Douglas, E. Reuter'
s"
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM John Franc
DATE: November 15, 1984
RE: Request by Chasewood for permission to sell
bonds in a Public Offering without a letter
of credit
Chasewood received preliminary approval for Housing Revenue
Bonds from the City in August of this year. They planned to have
a public sale backed by a letter of credit. Chasewood now
requests that no security would be provided beyond about a
two year period. The general partners are also unwilling to
provide personal guarantees.
n JURAN & MOODY, INC.
FstabIisIlad 1939
Minnesota Mutual Life Center
I U 400 North Robert Street-Suite 800
,r +' Saint Paul,Minnesota 55101-2091
l_
lelephone 612/224-1500
November 15, 1984 Minn.WATS 1-800-752-4886
Outstate WATS 1-800-328-3833
John Frane
Clerk-Finance Director
City Hall
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairio, MN 55344
RE: EDEN ODM MONS APARTMENT PROJECT
THE CHASEWOOD COMPANY
Dear John:
Our original financing proposal presented to Chasewood and the City
required that the bonds be secured with a Letter of Credit from a
bank. However, given the substantial financial strength of the
developers (In excess of $100,000,000) and their dominate position as
an apartment developer and manager (20,000 units) and the substantial
equity contribution of approximately $1,500,000, we feel that the
bonds can be underwritten without a Letter of Credit. We Intend to
apply the same underwriting criteria to the project financing as
would be applied by the Federal Housing Agency or the Federal
National Mortgage Association. in addition, we will require that the
developers guarantee the bonds during the period of construction and
initial rental of the project.
Sincerely,
JURAN 8 MOODY, INC
Jerome L. Hertel
Vice Presiden-r
JLH/eh
p,
MN- At poly.MN-llow.i'n,1X Cle;v wator,FI. Naplr s.Ft - t a Jolla.CA- Phoenix.AZ ;'.
M E M D R A N 0 U M
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: City Manager Carl J. Jullie
FROM: Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson
SUBJECT: Recycling Advisory Committee
DATE: November 16, 1984
At its October 2, 1984 meeting the City Council directed staff to solicit
interest in the community to serve on a recycling advisory committee. This
committee would develop recommendations to the Council regarding the goals of
recycling, the desired type of recycling program, and level of service in the
City. Council suggested that persons serving on the committee include members
of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission; the Planning
Commission; representatives of the solid waste collection industry; members of
local newspapers; and interested residents. Council indicated that maximum
size of the committee be nine persons.
To date, the following residents have contacted Council members or staff and
indicated a desire to serve on the proposed recycling advisory committee.
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission:
Jerry Kingrey 14311 Holly Road 937-1275
Jesse Schwartz,Jr.9181 Staring Lane East 937-1487
Waste Collection Industry:
Eden Prairie Trashtronics 6331 Indusrial Drive 937-2628
Woodlake Sanitary Service/
Browning-Ferris 9813 Flying Cloud Drive 941-5174
Residents:
Carlton Moore 10735 Fieldcrest Road 944-1314
James Osberg 9550 Timber Trail 941-3761
Mike Pauling 10805 Northmark Drive 941-4688
Doug Reuter 8750 Black Maple Drive 941-8444
Kathy Webster 14399 Chestnut Drive 934-7348
Staff support will be provided primarily by the Assistant to the City Manager.
CHARGE T_0 THE COP1h1ITTEE: The Council may wish to give a specific charge to
th e committee. Statt suggests that the committee work "to recommend an
overall strategy which will provide a cost-effective, environmentally sound
recycling service for Eden Prairie."
The Council should also give direction whether the correnittee ought to expand
its scope of work to include the general areas of solid waste collection and
alternative disposal technologies (e.g., modular waste incineration).
Page Two November 16, 1984
TIMETABLE: The time needed to complete a study and develop recommendations
will depend on the scope of the committee's activity and availability of
outside resources to speak to and work with the committee. Based on the
experience of other communities, it is desirable to implement a recycling
program while the weather is warm. A reasonable goal is for the committee to
present a report to the Council by its May 6, 1985 meeting. The committee can
begin its meetings in December 1984.
CWD:CJJ:Jdp
Mr Douplas E. Router
8i5o Black Maple Drive
Faun Prairin, Mn. 55344
941-8444
M,yur Penzel.
City of Eden Prairie
Dear Mayor Fenzel:
I am a resident of Eden Prajr3v and work in the solid waste
field. I understand there is a commission being formed to study
the solid waste problem in Eden Prairie.
I would respectfully request my name be entered along with any
others that are being cog idprod to serve on such a commission
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Respectfully,
z&*
Douglas E. Reuter
MENIOP,ANDUA1
T0: Mayor and City Council
TNRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: November 14, .1984
SUBJECT: Community Center Water Problems
As indicated earlier this year, proceedings have been commenced for the correction
of, or damages arriving from, defects in the Community Center, which have resulted
in the collection, leakage, and seepage of water in the building.
In order to proceed with the City's claim in this matter., it is necessary for the
City to determine the specific cause or causes creating the water problems, and
determine what corrective measures must be taken tb correct the problems and the
cost of those corrections.
Twin City Testing and Engineering Laboratories, Inc. have indicated that this
testing can be completed at a cost that will range from $4,500 to $6,000.
City staff requests authorization to enter into a contract with Twin City 'resting
to complete these services.
BL:md
2'��U
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz
RE: Winter Plowing and Sanding Procedures
DATE: November 15, 1984
Attached for your information is a copy of the article that will be
published in the "Happenings". Also attached are copies of the
letters of understanding that we have with Public Safety
concerning the call out of snow!sanding crews. I will be
available at the Council meeting to discuss these items in more
detail if you desire.
EAD:jdp
Attachments
j,
S
2 ��Gf
INTER-OFFICE MEMO
/ DATE. December 30, 1983
/TO. Public Safety Department
FROM: Lt. J. Clark
SUBJECT. CkrLL OUT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Please use the following guidelines when contacting on-call Public Works Supervisor
for snow removal and sanding.
1) Inclement weather necessitates a general sanding`,of the
entire City for rush hour. Call on-call person at 3:00 AM:'
2) Inclement weather necessitates argeneral plowing of the entire
City before rush hour. Call on-call person at 2:00 AM,'
3) As you drive around the City you findrhazardous spots; (ice or
snow drifting) that would not require-calling out entire Public
Works Department-.
a) If before I0.00 PN, call on-call person. Public Works will
serid out one or two trucks. _
b) If after 10:00 PM wait until 5.00 AM�and have Dog watch
car iot ify on-call person at that time.
4) An'emercency condition arises i (ie: Fire Department use of
water creates ice conditions, water leak, etc.) call out
Public Works I'no matter what time T
(,u have any questions, please see me.
p5 09 4l5 025 #33 0303
G --- 10 _.._ ] 27 34. 104
7 ]3 ]A 28 _ 101 105
8 ]G .. _ _ 2U _ - 31 _ 102 764
2i f)
.. AT:T1 1�tr
M-96
November 9, 1984
TO: Public safety Department
TFROM: Lt. Clark
ESUBJECT. SNOW AND ICE REMOVAL AND SNOWBIRDS
RWith winter moving in around us, it is time to remind everyone of our
policy concerning snow and ice removal and snowbirds.
Plowing - Emergency Notification
The supervisor shall, in the event of inclement weather, such as snow, ice
or sleet, which causes hazardous road conditions where plowing or sanding
is necessary, call the street sulerintendant early, possibly at the following
O times; for sanding call at 3:00 AM and the crews will begin at 4:00 AM, for
snow plowing call at 2:00 AM and the crews will begin at 3:00 AM. This will
F allow the Public Works Department to clear the streets before the morning
traffic rush.
FSnowbirds - Tagging and Towing
r During the first plowing pass, the drivers will make note of snowbirds and
y notify the Public Safety Department, Police Division of their location. The
supervisor will maintain a log of snowbirds. Upon completion of the first
rr plowing, the Police Division will assist with the removal of snowbirds.
The Police Division should make attempts at voluntary removal of the snow-
bird by the owner. However, if the owner is unavailable or unwilling to
remove the vehicle, the Police Division shall tag and tow the vehicle.
Consult the City Code for details of the snowbird - tagging and towing
enforcement.
Additionally, Dale Schmidt has asked the following:
Notification should be made to the on-call Public Works Supervisor.
-- In the event of any snow fall over one inch, we should notify the on-call
Public Works Supervisor at the appropriate time.
-- The city of Eden Prairie has cut back on sanding for the 84-85 year. The
will cut back sanding cul-de-sacs and non-essential areas. However, if
r` you have hazardous conditions continue to pass that information on
to Public Works supervisor.
r''ti
HERE COMES WINTER . . . AGAIN
L time to tune up the snow blower and replace that snow shovel with the
handle. .It's also time for the Public Works Department to be back
>,Joe;ing, probably within the next 30 (lays. This year,, there will be some
.Y s in our methods, so we would like to take this opportunity to review
c., policies with you.
level of service that the City provides during snowplowing operations is
d,irrmined during the budget process. We staff our street maintenance division
�,c,td on average conditions that can be expected during winter 111ont.hs. When
r,,v have extraordinary conditions such as last year, we simply cannot meet the
s,(h�-dules as we would like to. In the 1985 budget, the City has added an
additional staff member and truck-mounted plow. However, this is not intanded
to increase service levels, but more to attempt to maintain those levels that
v:e have provided in the past. For exampie, in 1981 therE was no appreciable
th,itye in the street mileage in Eden Prairie. in 1982, however, an additional
six mites of City streets were constructed. In 1983, nearly 15 miles of
ti:ets were added to the official street system. We expect when the final
figures are in for 1984, that an even higher rate of increase will be experienced.
All this information is passed on merely to emphasize that although our task
s manageable, it is stilt impossible for us to provide certain services. For
instance, we cannot prevent snow from being deposited in your driveway as
plow past your home. Furthermore, it is also very difficult and at times
-possilbe for the plow driver to detrrmine where the exact edge of the road
il. in order to prevent damage to the curb or your lawn. These two problems-
yours and our, are our greatest source of frustration. placing stakes
in,niediately behind your curb in those areas that have historically had problems
gill help guide us, especially during that first six-inch snowfall.
:his year, the City proposes to make substantial reductions in the amount of
,.and and salt applied to residential streets. Due to the kind of conditions
encountered last winter, the sand accumulation at the edge of streets was
significant this spring. It is our intention to sand the intersections in
residential areas, but the streets that have a lover vol((me of traffic and
are relatively level will be eliminated from the sanding procedure. Those
streets that have steep grades and a higher volume of traffic will continue
to be sanded.
Winter brings cold weather, slippery streets, and the inconvenience and irritation
associated with snow and snoriplowing. We are adjusting our methods of operation
in reaction to our observations from the past, and the comments from the
citizens of Eden Prairie. Your, patience and cooperation will certainly be
appreciated by our staff.
��
i
w
=a,,.
�.
`,
"�
w
„�
I'
.,,�
��
� `
ti�
���
��
��
•
�.
�"
i
1
1
•�!
r,
:��
w
➢��
•
�.
.�
�;��
!�
�.
�s
:;�
�4►
�•
��
s.
s
f ,=
�s
��
.n r
,`•
i
CAMERA OPERATOR'S CERTIFICATE
I hereby certify that thL microphotographs appearing on this roll Of RIM are true,
accurate,and complete copies of the original records described below.
Reproductions intended to serve as permanent records comply with standards
established by the Minnesota Historical Society.
AGENCY OF ORIGIN: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
RECORD SERIES: COUNCIL PACKETS
INCLUSIVEDATESINOS: rANuAeY tsrl - uECEbaER 1991
ROLL 10
BEGINS WITH: MARCH 1984
ENDS WITH: NOVEMER 19984
2/7/94
DATE CAM
ERA pRERAT�NAT11IixxE.,��^
CMI
CONCEPT MICRO IMAGING MINN TONS �fIY
PRODUCING LABORATORY CITYISTATE