HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 10/16/1984 EDEN PRAIRIE •
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
TUESDAY, OCTO8ER 16, 1984 7:3D PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Richard Anderson, George
Bentley, Paul Redpath and George Tangen
CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie; Assistant to the
City Manager Craig Dawson; City Attorney Roger
• Pauly; Finance Director John Franc; Planning
Director Chris Enger; Director of Community
Services Robert Lambert; Director of Public
Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary
Karen Michael
INVOCATION: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. COMMENDATION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY K-9 OFFICERS JANET KOCH, JAMES MATSON & RICK
RASENORT ---------- ----
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
•
,-.I. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 115-84, amending City Code Sec. 2.05 relating Pg. 2250
to salaries of Mayor and—CCU-mil members
B. Clerk's License List Pg. 2252
•
C. SHADY OAK RIDGE by Joseph Ruzic. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 112-84, Pg. 2253
Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5, Approval of Developer's Agreement for Shady
Oak Ridge; and Adoption of Resolution No. 84-250, Approving Summary of
Ordinance No. 112-84 and Ordering Publication of said Summary for Shady
Oak Ridge. 11.5 acres for 36 townhouse units. Location: North of
Rowland Road, west of Old Shady Oak Road.
D. LEARNING TREE/MINNESOTA TREE 2ND ADDITION. 2nd Reading of Ordinance Pg. 2260
Flo.1O8-84, Rezoning from Rural to Commercial-Regional-Service for
Learning Tree, and Adoption of Resolution No. 84-273 Approving Development
Plan for Learning Tree. 1.07 acres for day care center. Location:
Southeast quadrant of Prairie Center Drive and Valley View Road.
E. Final Plat approval for Research Farm First Addition (Resolution No. 84- Pg. 2264
•
F. Change Order No. 1, I.C. 52-064, Flying Cloud Drive Improvements Pg. 2265
- G. Change Order No. 1, I.C. 52-059, Carmel and Vicinity Imarovements Pg. PP67
H. Change Order No. 3, I.C. 51-308A, N.E. Quadrant of MCA Roadway System Pg. 2268
City Cour :enda - 2 - Tues.,October 16, 1984
I, Eution ordering_the_preparation of a Feasibility Report for Drainage Pg. 2271
. sovements in the Bluffs West Area, I.C. 52-069 (Resolution No.
2 79) ---
J. Eioal Plat approval for Edenvale Industrial Park 7th Addition (Resolution Pg. 2272
No. 84-280)
K. final Plat approval for_Valley View Manor Homes (Resolution No. 84-263) Pg. 2275
L. Final Plat approval for Wilson Ridge (Resolution No. 84-281) Pg. 2278
M. Final Plat a approval for Minnesota Tree 2nd Addition (Resolution No. 84-282) Pg. 2281
N. Reject bids for installation of bridges for Staring Lake Bike Trail Pg. 2284
0. Final approval of MunicApal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount Pg. P285
of $2,750,000.00 for Portnoy Project '(Resolution No. 84-287T
P. Approval of contract for 1984 LAWCON Grant Pg. 2286
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. EDEN COMMONS by the Chasewood Company. Request for Zoning District Change Pg. 2289
from Rural to RM-2.5 for 194 multiple family residential units, Preliminary
Plat of 12.5 acres into one lot, and Environmental Assessment Worksheet
Review. Location: Northwest corner of Franlo Road and Preserve Boulevard.
(Ordinance No. 118-84 - Rezoning from Rural to RM-2.5; Resolution No.
84-274 - Preliminary Plat)
B. SUPERAME:RiCA. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to C-Hwy Pg. 2310
and Preliminary Plat of 1.35 acres for Service Station/Covenience Store.
Location: Southwest quadrant of County Road 4 and Highway 5. (Ordinance
No. 119-84 - Rezoning from Rural to C-Hwy; Resolution No. 84-275 -
Preliminary Plat)
C. PRIMETECH II by Prime Development. Request for Planned Unit Development Pg. 2322
District Review of 20.0 acres; Zoning District Change from Rural to
Commercial-Regional-Service 1.0 acre; and Preliminary Plat of 4.0 acres
into one lot for construction of a day care center. Location: North of
Shady Oak Road, East of City West Parkway. (Ordinance No. 120-84-PUD-9-
84, Rezoning from Rural to PUD-9-B4-Commercial-Regional-Service;
Resolution No. 84-276 - Preliminary Plat)
•
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 16311 - 16565 Pg. 2332
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
VI1. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
VIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
B.. Report of City Manager
1. Reclyst for gyroval of site grading for Muirfield Pg. 2339
2. MIDB Guidelines (continued from 8/28/84) Pg. 2340
•
C. Report of City_Attorney
City Co,anccil Agenda - 3 - Tues.,0ctober 16, 1984
Report of Director of Public Works
1. Award contract for CSAH 1 & 18 Utility Improvements, I.C. 52-062
-Resolution No. 84-284)
•
2. Award contract for Eden Road and Singletree Lane Improvements,
I.C. 52-011A & B (Resolution No. 84-283)
3. Award contract for Lime Sludge Hauling, I.C. 52-063 (Resolution.No. Pg. 2341
84-283)
IX. NEW BUSINESS
X. ADJOURNMENT. `r
f
•
j1
}
I
•
•
ORDINANCE NO. 115-84 •
•
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY
CODE SECTION 2.05 RELATING TO THE SALARIES OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
MEMBERS, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SEC-
TION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS:
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: y-
Section 1. City Code Section 2.05 shall be and is amended
to read as follows: :.
SEC. 2.05. SALARIES OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS.
Subd. 1. The monthly salary of the Mayor shall be
$300.00 [until December 31, 1984, and shall be $400.00 thereafter.]
Subd. 2. The monthly salary of each Council member k
4.
shall be $200.00 [until December 31, 1984, and shall be $400.00
thereafter.]
Subd. 3. In addition to the above, the Mayor and each
Council member shall be paid a reasonable sum for each day plus
the reasonable expenses incurred while traveling outside the
City on business of the City. ,
Subd. 4. Salary adjustments shall become effective '
on January 1 of the year following the next regular election
which is preceded by amendment of this Subdivision.
Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions
)
and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including E'
Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 are hereby adopted in
their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and
after its passage and publication.
1L •
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of
Eden Prairie on the day of , 1984,
and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of
, 1984.
ATTEST:
City Clerk Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
, 1984.
-2-
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
October 16, 1984
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) HEATING & VENTILATING
CDC Constructors, Inc. Custom Heating, Inc.
DCI Interior Systems, Inc.
Jalco Construction, Inc. GAS FITTER
Oak Hill Construction
Custom Heating, Inc.
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY)
TEMPORARY 3:2 Beer License
Buesg-Co Corporation
Envirotech Homes, Inc. Eden Prairie Football Association
Haugdahl Bros. Construction
Klink Construction, Inc.
David A. Williams Construction 3.2 Beer On Sale
Pizza Hut, Inc.
t PLUMBING i
Kraemer Mechanical
Krumholz Co.
State Mechanical, Inc.
United Plumbing & Heating
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for
the licensed activity.
gA
Pat Solie, Licensing
Shady Oak Ridge
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 112-84
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS DF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the Rural District and be placed in the RM-6.5 District.
Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be,
and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
RM-6.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in
City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended
accordingly.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1,. entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of
that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of October 16, 1984, entered into
between Joseph Ruzic, an individual, and the City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement
is hereby made a part hereof.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 28th day of August, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 16th day of
October, 1984.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
225.9,
Exhibit A
SHADY OAK RIDGE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter, Section 2, Township 116, Range 22, thence West along the North line of said
Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 566.4D feet; thence
Southerly, deflecting to the left 90 degrees, 12 minutes, a distance of 15.67 feet;
thence Southerly along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 1526.43
feet and a central angle of 6 degrees, 00 minutes, a distance of 159.85 feet; thence
Southwesterly, tangent to said curve, 59.85 feet; thence Southerly along a
tangential curve to the left having a radius of 396.16 feet and a central angle of
28 degrees, 20 minutes, a distance of 195.90 feet; thence Southeasterly, tangent to
the last described curve, 166.70 feet; thence Southeasterly along a tangential curve
to the right having a radius of 867.98 feet and a central angle of 13 degrees 09
minutes, a distance of 199.21 feet; thence Southeasterly, tangent to the last
described curve, to an intersection with a line drawn West, parallel with the South
line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, from a point on the East
line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 786.30 feet South
from the Northeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, said
intersection being the actual point of beginning; thence continuing Southeasterly,
tangent to the last described curve, to a point 23.5 feet from the point of tangency
of the last described curve; thence Southeasterly along a tangential curve to the
right having a radius of 1909.85 feet and a central angle of 3 degrees, 00 minutes,
a distance of 99.99 feet; thence Southeasterly, tangent to the last described curve,
147.50 feet; thence Southwesterly along a tangential curve to the left having a
radius of 1278.77 feet and a central angle of 6 degrees, 16 minutes, a distance of
139.87 feet; thence Southeasterly, tangent to the last described curve, 130.10 feet
1 more or less to apoint on the South line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter distant 386 feet West from the Southeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of
the Northeast Quarter; thence West along said South line to a point thereon 834.05
feet West from the Southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter; thence North, parallel with the East line of said Southeast Quarter to the
Northeast Quarter a distance of 522.11 feet, more or less to an intersection with a
line drawn °West, parallel with the South line of said Southeast Quarter of the
Northeast quarter, from the actual point of beginning; thence East along .said
parallel line to the actual point of beginning, according to the Government Survey
thereof. •
Also, that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast 'Quarter, Section 2,
Township 116, Range 22, described as commencing at the Northeast corner of said
Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence West along the North line of said
Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 566.40 feet to the actual
point of beginning; thence Southerly, deflecting to the left 90 degrees 12 minutes a
distance of 15.67 feet; thence Southerly along a tangential curve to the right
having a radius of 1526.43 feet and a central angle of 6 degrees, 00 minutes a
distance of 159.85 feet; thence Southwesterly, tangent to said curve, 59.85 feet;
thence Southerly along a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 396.16 feet
and a central angle of 28 degrees 20 minutes, a distance of 195.90 feet; thence
Southeasterly tangent to the last described curve, 166.70 feet; thence Southeasterly
along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 867.98 feet and a central
angle of 13 degrees 09 minutes, a distance of 199.21 feet; thence Southeasterly,
tangent to the last described curve, to an intersection ►with a line drawn West,
parallel with the South line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter,
•
2L.t •
from a point on the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter
distant B6.3 feet South from the Quarter; thence West along saidt corner o line f idtooatpoint t
heast Quarter of the
Northeast thereon 834.05
feet West from the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter as
measured along said parallel line; thence North, parallel with the East line of said
Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 780.40 feet to the North
line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence East along said
North line to the actual point of beginning, according to the Government Survey
thereof.
Also, that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 2,
Township 116, Range 22, lying Northwesterly of the Northwesterly right of way line
Of Rowland Road and lying Northeasterly of the following described line; commencing
at the Northeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence
West along the North line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a
distance of 834.05 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line to be
described; thence deflecting to the left 126 degrees to the Northwesterly right of
way line of Rowland Road and there terminating.
•
• • •
•
•
• •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• . Shady Oak Ridge
•
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1984, by
and between Joseph Ruzic, an individual, hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the
CITY DF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
•
WHEREAS, Owner has applied for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low •
Density Residential to Medium Density Residential, Zoning from Rural to RM-6.5, and
preliminary platting of 11.5 acres for Shady Dak Ridge, located west of Old Shady
Oak Road, north of Rowland Road, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota,
more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof and
t" hereinafter referred to as "the property;" and, •
WHEREAS, Owner has applied to City to develop the property for construction
•
of 36 townhouse units;
NDW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #112-84 and
Resolution /84-193, Owner covenants and agrees to construction upon, development,
and maintenance of said property as follows:
•
•
1. . Owner shall plat and develop the property in conformance with the
materials dated August 14, 1984, as revised, reviewed and approved
by the City Council on August 28, 1984, and attached hereto as
Exhibit B, and made a part hereof, subject to such changes and
modifications as are provided herein. Owner shall not develop,
construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or
manner than provided herein.
•
2. Owner covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by •
Owner at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of
the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Prior to final plat, Owner shall submit to the City Engineer, and
receive the City Engineer's approval of the following:
•
A. Final grading, storm water drainage, and erosion control
plans plans.
B. Detailed plans for sanitary sewer, water, and streets.
C. Plans for sanitary sewer extension for provision of sanitary
sewer to the properties to the west.
4. Prior to building permit issuance, Owner shall: •
A. Submit to the Director of Planning, and obtain the
Director's approval of the following:
• 1. An overall landscaping plan for the property,
indicating the size, type, and location of all
materials to be installed on the property.
2. An erosion control plan, showing protection of the
trees during construction by snow fencing.
3. A plan for signs and street lighting on the
property. •
B. Submit to the Director of Community Services, and receive
the Director's approval of a trail easement to provide
pedestrian access to the regional park to the west of the
property.
5. Owner agrees to confine grading to that area of the property within
the construction limits as shown on Exhibit B. Owner shall place
snow fencing at the construction limits within the wooded areas
prior to any grading upon the property.
•
Prior to issuance of any building permit for the. property, Owner
shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's
approval of a replacement plan for all trees removed, damaged, or
destroyed outside of the construction area. Owner further agrees
that said trees shall be replaced by similar tree species, diameter
inch for diameter inch (i.e. a Red Oak 12 inches in diameter may be
replaced by three Red Oaks four inches in diameter). The trees used
for replacement shall be no less than three inches in diameter.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Owner shall construct, or
cause .to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said
plans, as approved by the Director of Planning.
•
•
•
1 .
•
Shady Oak Ridge
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
• HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 84-250
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE 112-84 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 112-84 was adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 16th day of October,
1984;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN •
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 112-84, which is
attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said
• text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said
ordinance.
•
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
• body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
• Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 112-84 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein,
within 20 days after said publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on October 16, 1984.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
•
John D. Frane, City Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ' • •
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 112-84
•
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY DF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
•
ZONING OISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
d
THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH.E CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
•
Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located north of
Rowland Road and west of Old Shady Oak Road, known as Shady Oak Ridge, from Rural
District to RM-6.5 District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's
agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal
description of this property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
•
ATTEST:
•
/s/John D. Frane /s/Wolfgang H. Penzel •
City Clerk Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1984.
•
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
•
•
•
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE •
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
•
RESOLUTION NO. 84-273
A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
OF COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LEARNING TREE DAY CARE
FOR A DEVELOPMENT OF A DAY CARE CENTER ON 1.03 ACRES
BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal for Learning Tree Day Care for development of a day
care center on approximately 1.03 acres, located in the southeast quadrant of
Prairie Center Drive and Valley View Road, is herein approved subject to the
following specific conditions:
1. The development plan, preliminary plat, and erosion control and grading
plan, all dated July 13, 1984, and attached hereto shall apply.
2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, developer/owner shall:
A. Submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's
approval of:
1. A revised site plan providing for a protected lane in front
of the building and converting parking spaces into green
area. Two parking spaces shall be added along the western
parking area.
2. A revised landscape plan providing for berming and plantings
within the front yard and showing increased sizes of the
plant materials with a minimum shrub height of 24 inches and
minimum height of coniferous trees of six feet.
3. A revised preliminary plat designating Lot 2, Block 1, and
Lot 1, Block 2, as outlots.
B. Submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's
approval of detailed erosion control, grading, and drainage plans
for the property.
C. Submit to the Watershed District and receive the Watershed
District's approval of erosion control, grading, and drainage plans
for the property.
D. Stake the construction limits with snow fencing, or other materials
approved by the City Engineer.
E. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
3. Developer shall provide for cross-access to the east and west parcels, and
submit a cross-access agreement, outlining access rights and maintenance
responsibilities between adjoining properties, for City review and approval.
4. Developer shall construct the full width of the driveway centered on the
•
west property line. •
ADOPTED by the City Council on October 16, 1984.
•
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
•
John D. Frane, City Clerk •
•
/7/ A•
Learning Tree pay Care
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
• HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
OROINANCE NO. 108-84
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE _'
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMDNG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
• (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2.
removed fromthe Rural haDistrict nand ashall s lbey �placed eind p the osComnercial-Regionab-
Service District.
Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be,
and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
Commercial-Regional-Service District and the legal descriptions of land in each
District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B,
shall be, and are amended accordingly.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
Oefinitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 18th day of September, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 16th day of
October, 1984.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1984.
•
•
rL
• d
•
•
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE
DAY CARE CENTER SITE
That part of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range
22, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows:
Commencing at the intersection of the northerly line of Trunk Highway Number
169 per Document No. 3400637 with the East line of said Section 10; thence
southwesterly along the northerly line of said Trunk Highway Number 169 on
• an assumed bearing of South 77 degrees 14 minutes 03.4 seconds West a
distance of 750.81 feet; thence North 76 degrees 31 minutes 47.3 seconds
West a distance of 154.53 feet; thence North 38 degrees 29 minutes 40.2
seconds West a distance of 31.50 feet; thence North 0 degrees 27 minutes
27.6 seconds East a distance of 1011.523 feet; thence North 43 degrees 38
minutes 52.7 seconds East a distance of 28.72 feet; thence North 87 degrees
45 minutes 12.9 seconds East a distance of 87.63 feet; thence easterly a
distance of 71.96 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the north,
having a radius of 1205.92 feet and a central angle of 3 degrees 25 minutes
tr 08 seconds to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence
k continue easterly a distance of 141.00 feet along the continuation of the
last described curve to the northwesterly corner of Lot 1, Block 1, PRAIRIE
WASH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, said Hennepin County;
thence South 21 degrees 24 minutes 22 seconds East along the westerly line
of said Lot 1 a distance of 276.88 feet to the southwesterly corner of said
Lot 1 and the south line of the Northeast Quarter of said Southeast Quarter;
thence South 89 degrees 55 minutes 16 seconds West along said south line a
distance of 125.00 feet; thence South 0 degrees 04 minutes 44 seconds East
a distance of 65.D0 feet; thence South 89 degrees 55 minutes 16 seconds West
a distance of 60.97 feet; thence North 10 degrees 35 minutes 47 seconds West
a distance of 316.35 feet to the point of beginning. •
•
•
•
2 27..2).
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager .
FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
DATE: October 12, 1984
SUBJECT: RESEARCH FARM ADDITION
This submittal is for a split of the Northrup King property into 3 large
outlots. The purpose of the split is to enable the conveyance of Outlot C
in the northwest corner of the Northrup King parcel to Centex Development.
In fact, the Dutlot C parcel would have been split with an administrative
division, except that the County had difficulties approving that kind of
division without dedication of Research Road.
Because the entire property will necessarily be reviewed by the Manning
Commission and City Council at a future date, it is recommended that this
plat be approved on the basis of it being a simple subdivision which will
not circumvent the need for futher scrutiny at a later date. The Council
appears to have this authority under Section 12.60, Subdivision 3.
Further, at later platting stages, the additional right-of-way necessary
for T.H. 169, Research Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway will be platted with
future developments. Therefore, the staff recommends that the simple
subdivision be approved with the following conditions:
1. Defer engineering fees until future platting.
2. Defer additional right-of-way dedications until future platting.
3. Defer street light fees until future platting.
4. Defer sign fees until future development.
5. Subject to other applicable requirements of the City Code.
6. Subject to the special assessments as proposed to the project
from the construction of Anderson Lakes Parkway.
EAD:sg
cc: Dick Putnam, Tandem Corp.
,.) / i,
CHANGE ORDER NO.1
September 24, 1984
PROJECT: Flying Cloud Drive
Eden Prairie,Minnesota
E.P.1.C.f152-064
RCM Project No.841016
TO: Opus Corporation
You are hereby directed to make the changes noted below in the subject contract.
Nature of Change:
1. Revise handrails on wingwalls of box culvert from 3'to 4'high.
2. Remove and replace fence on right-of-way line of Highway 169-212 (Sta.
34+00+).
3. Add a 12" PVC storm sewer inlet from CB-14 to east.
4. Add bituminous paving in boulevards near box culvert wing walls (2.5" 2341
bituminous wear and 5"C1-S base).
5. Add connection of 21"RCP storm sewer to box culvert.
6. Add 15" flared end section with riprap and filter blanket west of CB-13.
7. Eliminate 15"RCP storm sewer from CB-13 to CB-11.
8. Remove existing 12"PVC culvert under bituminous path.
9. Relocate temporary creek by-pass culvert.
Justification:
1. Required per request by City of Eden Prairie.
2. Required to install 15" storm sewer to existing ditch within Highway 169-212
right-of-way.
3. Required to pick up surface drainage from area cast of bituminous path.
4. Required per request by City of Eden Prairie.
5. Required per request by Watershed District to eliminate direct storm sewer
discharge to creek.
6. Required for new storm sewer outlet from CB-13.
Change Order No. 1
Page 2
7. Not required because of new storm sewer outlet to Highway 169-212 ditch.
8. This culvert is being replaced by a new 12"PVC storm sewer to CB-14.
9. Required due to revised location of new box culvert.
Schedule of Adjustments to Contract Costs:
1. Add: Revised Handrail from 3'to 4' 1 LS @$1,032.00 = $ 1,032.00
2. Add: Remove and replace fence 1 LS @$250.00 = 250.00
3. Add: 12" PVC storm sewer 35 LF @$12.00 = 420.00
4. Add: Bituminous paving in boulevards 120 SY @$16.00 = 1,920.00
5. Add: Box culvert connection 1 LS @$900.00 = 900.00
6. Add: 15"flared end section with riprap 1 EA @$934.00 = 934.00
7. Deduct: 15" RCP storm sewer,Class IV 580 LF @$19.50 = 11,310.00
8. Add: Remove existing 12"PVC culvert 10 LF @$6.00 = 60.00
9. Add: Relocate temporary creek culvert 1 LS @$1,000.00 = 1,000.00 1
Summary of Contract Adjustments:
Contract Amount Prior to this Change Order $773,124.75
Net Decrease Resulting from this Change Order $ (4,794.00)
Current Contract Amount Including this Change Order $768,330.75
The Above Changes are Approved:
RCM,M. / y CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
1 By
Date '1/ _/'Y __— Date
The Above Changes are Accepted:
OPUS CORPORATION
By
Date
/ I.
CHANGE ORDER ND. I
• OCTOBER 1, 1984
•
PROJECT: Utility and Street laproveaents For Cartel First Addn. & vicinity
1.C. 52-059A&B
TO: Brown&Cris, Inc.
You are hereby directed to make the following changes to your
Contract for the above referenced project.
NATURE OF CHANGE:
Additional store sever to provide storm water ponding drainage
through the second addition.
Remove and replace existing cep pipe culvert across Old Shady Oak Rd.
r
ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT QUANTITIES:
Add the following quantities to the current Contract quantities.
(A1 IB'RCP Sewer 393.0 L.F. @$29.00: $11711.40
8 1B'RCP Apron & trash guard 2.0 Ea. @ S502.00: $ 1004.00
6' Dia. Sump Manhole 113' Deep 1.0 Ea. @$3099.00= $ 3099.00
Standard Manhole 15.4' Deep 1.0 Ea. @51245.00: $ 1245.00
Standard Catch Basin 14.9' Deep 1.0 Ea. @11360.00: $ 1360.00
(B1 Remove and replace existing cap pipe culvert
100.0 L.F. @$11.33: $ 1133.00
TOTAL $ 19,552.40
SCGBARY OF ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT TOTAL AMOUNT:
Contract Total Acount prior to this Change Order (RUB) ---- $ 352,223.25
Increase resulting from this Change Order (A L 8) $ 19,552.40
Revised Contract Total Aeount including this Change Order - $ 371,775.65
THE ABOVE CHOOSES ARE APPROVED: THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTED:
THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MN. BRDNN&CRIS, INC.
By By !--4
DATE DATE
CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 3 .
TO CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT IC 51-308A-2 •
PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE INTERCHANGE AT 1494
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
September, 1984 BENNETT-RINGROSE-WOLSFELD-JARVIS-GARDNER, INC.
700 Third Street South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414
SCHEOULE B
(LOCAL STREETS)
ADDITIONS
Estimated
Item No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount
1. Mobilization L.S. 1.0 $14,000.00 $ 14,000.00
2. Traffic Control L.S. 1.0 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00
3. 30" R.C. Pipe Sewer
Class IV L.F. 182.0 $ 48.75 $ 8,872.50
4. 33" R.C. Pipe Sewer
Class III L.F. 38.0 $ 46.00 $ 1,748.00
5. 36" R.C. Pipe Sewer
Class III L.F. 20.0 $ 56.00 $ 1,120.00
6. 48" R.C. Pipe Sewer L.F. 15.0 $ 68.00 $ 1,020.00
•
7. Bit. Wear Course
Mix. 2341 Modified TON 3210.0 $ 12.01 $ 38,600.14
8. Timber Tie Retaining
Wall S.F. 2850.0 $ 11.00 b 3. 350.00
TOTAL ADDITIONS SCHEDULE B $100,710.64
DELETIONS
Estimated
Item No. Item Unit Quantitt Unit PrIce Amount
1. 30" R.C. Pipe Sewer
Class III L.F. 182.0 $ 40.00 $ 7,280,00
2. 8i1. Wear Course
Mix. 2341 TON 2735.3 $ 11.35 1 31,045.66
TOTAL DELETIONS SCHEDULE B $ 38,325.66
Page 1 of 3
DescriplIun and location of Work
•
T( abov.: Itemized work Is located on Prairie Center Drive and Valley View Road
(� d County Road 39).
Necessity for Amendment
SCHEDULE 8
ADDITIONS
Items 1-2, These Items have been necessitated by the addition of the reconstruc-
4-6 tion of approximately 1,000 feet of Valley View Road. All other
items necessary for the reconstruction of the additional roadway
are Included In the original contract and will be paid accordingly
as an extension of the original estimated quantity at the price
bid.
Item 3. Pipe depth was revised to better facilitate drainage plans for
the Golden Strip development at Viking Drive. The revised depth
of pipe required an Increase In class size.
Item 7. The Minnesota Department of Transportation modified the Standard
2341 bituminous wear mixture as the result of numerous problems
encountered with the standard mix In recent years. The new mix
design will provide a more dependable wear course for this project.
IL 8. The timber tie retaining wall is being constructed to save a
significant stand of oaks adjacent to Valley View Road between
Stations 8+00 and 10+98.
DELETIONS
Item 1. See Item 3. above.
Item 2. See item 7. above.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT S3,782,476.29
TOTAL PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMENDMENTS b19,929.00
SUBTOTAL f3,802,405.29
TOTAL ADDITIONS CONTRACT AMENDMENT #3 Si 100710.64
SUBTOTAL S3,903,115.93
TOTAL DEDUCTIONS CONTRACT AMENDMENT #3 Si 38,3:'5.66
CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE 53,864,790.27
Page 2 of 3
CONTRACTOR: •
Shafer Contracting Company, Inc. ` rY1--� —
Title: Date: 9/Pr/rig-
ENGINEER:Bennett-Ringrose-Wolsfeld-Jarvis-Gardner, Inc. t_' . E
Title: . �5. Date: ��9 zc-8,1
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
City Engineer: Date:
j;
Page 3 of 3
11_1 U
October 16, 1984
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY,'MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 84-279
RESOLUTION ORDERING FEASI8ILITY REPORT
WHEREAS, a request from property owners in the vicinity of proposed
Bluffs West 5th Addition has been received and it is proposed to make the
following improvements:
I.C. 52-069, Drainage Improvements in the Bluffs West 5th
Addition and Vicinity
and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the
improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council:
That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer
for study with the assistance of Hansen, Thorp, Pellinen and
Olson, Inc. and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and
presented to the City Council with all convenient speed advising
the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment
and feasibility of the proposed improvements.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on October 16, 1984. •
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
October 16, 1984
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
•
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA •
RESOLUTION 84-280
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT DF •
f
EDENVALE INDUSTRIAL PARK 7th ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of Edenvale Industrial Park 7th•Add. .. :has been •
submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance 4
Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have
been duly had thereunder; and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. 1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for Edenvale Industrial Park 7th Addition
is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the
City Engineer's report on this plat dated October 4, 1984.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the
above named plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on October 16, 1984.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
•
John D. Franc, Clerk
•
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician
DATE: October 4, 1984
SUBJECT: EDENVALE INDUSTRIAL PARK 7TH ADDITION
"formerly Edenvale III
PRDPOSAL:
The developer, Richard W. Anderson, has requested City Council
approval of the final plat of Edenvale Industrial Park 7th Addition,
located north of Martin Drive and west of Mitchell Road in the
South h of Section 9. The site contains approximately 4.6 acres
and presently consists of 2 lots (Lots 6 and 7, Block 1 Edenvale
Industrial Park 4th Addition). The proposed plat will combine the
2 lots into 1 intended for the construction of an office/warehouse
building.
HISTORY:
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on October 2,
1984, per Resolution 84-258.
A permit for construction within a designated floodplain area was
granted by the City Council on October 2, 1984, per Resolution 84-271.
Zoning to 1-2 Park was approved on August 8, 1972, per Ordinance 179. r.
VARIANCE:
All variance requests not covered by Resolution 84-271 must be
processed through the Board of Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
All municipal utilities and streets to serve the proposal have been
installed.
Extension of the municipal storm sewer system within the site will be
required and accomplished in conformance with City standards.
Additional drainage and utility easements, consistant with City
Standards, must be shown prior to release of the plat.
PARK DEDICATION:
Park dedication must conform to the requirements of the City Code.
BONDING: •
Bonding must conform to the requirements of the City Code.
rr fr
•
Pg. 2, final Plat Edenvale Industrial Park 7th Addition 10/4/84
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of the final plat of Edenvale Industrial Park 7th
Addition subject to the requirements of this report and the following:
1: Receipt of engineering fed in the amount of $100.00.
2. Satisfaction of bonding requirements to cover the
installation of municipal storm sewer.
3. Additional drainage and utility easements.
4. Conformance with letter dated October 2, 1984, from
Scott Anderson to Chris Enger.
5. Conformance with development plan dated October 2, 1984.
DLO:sg
cc: Mr. Richard W. Anderson
Progress Engineering
•
•
6
October 16, 1984
- A
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESDTA �• i
RESOLUTION 84-263 '
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
VALLEY VIEW MANOR HOMES
.
WHEREAS, the plat of Valley View Manor Homes . :has been
submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance
Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have
been duty had thereunder; and
• WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
• NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for Valley View Manor Homes
is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the
City Engineer's report on this plat dated October 5, 1984. 1
• B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the
above named plat. •
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on October 16, 1984.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor 1
•
ATTEST: SEAL
1
.' •
E
1
John D. Frane, Clerk
i
1
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager •
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician
DATE: October 5, 1984 •
SUBJECT: VALLEY VIEW MANOR HOMES
PROPOSAL:
The developer, Sunrise Properties, Inc., has requested City Council
approval of the final plat of Valley View Manor Homes located north
of Valley View Road and east of Edenvale Apartments in the South �
of Section 10. The plat contains approximately 19.4 acres intended
for the construction of 112 condominium units within 14 buildings
(8 units each).
HISTDRY:
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on March 27,
1984, per Resolution 84-51.
Zoning to RM 6.5 was finally read and approved by the Council on
May 1, 1984, per Ordinance 21-84.
Resolution 84-79, approved by the Council on May 1, 1984, summarizes
specific conditions for approval.
VARIANCES:
All variance requests not previously approved through Resolution
84-79 must be processed through the Board of Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
Municipal utilities, streets and walkways will be installed throughout
the site in conformance with City Standards.
PARK DEDICATION:
Park dedication will conform to the requirements of the City Code
and Resolution 84-79.
•
The area shown as park, on the east side of the plat, is dedicated
to the public on the dedication to the public on the dedication
sheet of the final plat.
BONDING:
Bonding will conform to the requirements of the City Code.
MISCELLANOUS:
During the acquisition of excess right-of-way for Valley View Road
• project, I.C. 51-340A, an error was made in the legal description
creating a small remnant. The developer has agreed to transfer the
ownership of this remnant to the City of Eden Prairie.
Pg. 2, Final Plat Valley View Manor Homes 10/5/84 -
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of the final plat of Valley View Manor Homes,
subject to the requirements of this report, Resolution 84-79,
and the following:
1. Receipt of fee for street signs in the amount of $670.00.
2. Receipt of fee for street lights in the amount of $3,276.00. •
3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $2,240.00.
4. Satisfaction of bonding requirements.
•
5. Satisfaction of park dedication requirements. $`
6. Transfer of the remnant on the south side of Valley View Road
to the City of Eden Prairie.
DLO:sg
cc: Mr. John Vosika, Sunrise Properties, Inc.
•
•
•
•
2277 •
October 16, 1984
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
•
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 84-281
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
WILSON RIDGE
•
•
WHEREAS, the plat of Wilson Ridge . :has been
submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance
Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have
been duly had thereunder; and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for Wilson Ridge
is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the
City Engineer's report on this plat dated 10/5/84.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the
above named plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on October 16, 1984. •
•
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL •
John D. Fran, Clerk
•
2
z ?�
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician c4). ‘).
DATE: October 5, 1984
SUBJECT: WILSDN RIDGE
PROPOSAL:
Wilson Ridge Joint Venture has requested City Council approval of
the final plat of Wilson Ridge, a 60.8 acre site intended for
office and industrial use. The proposed division consists of the
platting of 3 lots and 4 outlots plus right-of-way dedication for
Flying Cloud Drive. The site is located north of Valley View Road
and east of T.H. 169 in Section 12. Outlots A, B, C and D will be
subject to platting and rezoning procedures consistant to City Code
requirements prior to issuance of building permits upon these lots.
HISTORY:
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on April 3,
1984, per Resolution 84-67.
Zoning to Office for 18.64 acres (Lot 1, Block 1) and to I-2 Park
for 5.42 acres (Lot 2, Block 1) was finally read and approved by
the City Council on May 22, 1984, per Ordinance 24-84.
Zoning of lot 1, Block 2 to 1-2 (10.9 acres) is scheduled for
Planning Commission review on October 15, 1984.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was
executed on May 22, 1984.
VARIANCES:
All variance requests not covered through the Developer's Agreement
must be processed through the Board of Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
Municipal utilities, streets and walkways are being installed
throughout the site under a City contract.
Additional drainage and utility easements in conformance with City
policy, will be shown on the plat prior to release from the
Engineering Department.
PARK DEDICATION:
The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's
Agreement.
Recordable documents covering the preservation and scenic easements,
required through the Developer's Agreement, must be provided to
the Engineering Department prior to release of the final plat.
�2'I�
Pg. 2 Final Plat Wilson Ridge 10/5/84
BONDING:
Bonding will conform to City Code requirements.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of the final plat of Wilson Ridge subject to
the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and
the following:
1. Receipt of fee for street signs in the amount of $230.00.
2. Receipt of fee for street lighting in the amount of $6,552.00.
(As an alternate, the developer may wish to consider providing
additional private lights to avoid the need for wood poles
and Cobra style fixtures).
3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $700.00.
•
4. Receipt of recordable preservation and scenic easement
documents.
DLO:sg
cc: Wally Hustad
2-2-ZO
October 16, 1984
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
•
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 84-282
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
•
MINNESOTA TREE SECOND ADDITION
•
WHEREAS, the plat of Minnesota Tree Second Addition .has been
submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance
Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have
been duly had thereunder; and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for Minnesota Tree Second Addition
is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the
City Engineer's report on this plat dated 10/9/84.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the
above named plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on October 16, 1984.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL •
•
John D. Frane, Clerk
5'
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
•
TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician cW
DATE: October 9, 1984
SUBJECT: MINNESOTA TREE SECOND ADDITION
(a.k.a. Learning Tree Day Care Center)
• PROPOSAL:
Project Developers, Inc., and Walter Carpenter have requested City
Council approval of the final plat of Minnesota Tree Second Addition.
The site contains approximately 5.5 acres intended for the construction
of a 6,000 sq. ft day care center. The proposed plat is located
south of Valley View Road and west of the recently approved Prairie
Wash Addition in the South '-; of Section 12.
HISTORY:'
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on September
18, 1984, per Resolution 84-242. Zoning to Commercial Regional
Service, Ordinance 108-84, is scheduled for second reading by the
Council on October 16, 1984.
Resolution 84-277, summarizing specific conditions for approval of
the plan, is scheduled for City Council approval on October 16, 1984.
VARIANCES:
All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals.
•
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
All municipal utilities and streets necessary to provide service to
this site have been installed. The developers must submit plans to
the Engineering Department and recieve approval, prior to release of
the final plat, of the proposed on-site utility systems. Service
to this site will involve the joint installation of utilities through
an adjacent subdivision (Prairie Wash Addition) and will include a
provision for future extension.
Access to the site from Valley View Road will be shared with the
•
proposed Prairie Wash. Cross easements covering joint access and
maintenance of utilities will be necessary. Copies of the recordable
documents must he submitted to the Engineering Department prior to
release of the plat.
PARK DEDICATION:
Park dedication will conform to the requirements of the City Code.
BONDING:
Bonding will comply with Eden Prairie City Code requirements. •
•
� 72
Pg. 2, Final Plat Minnesota Tree Addition 10/9/84
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of the final plat of Minnesota Tree Second
Addition subject to the requirements of this report, Resolution
84-277 and the following:
1. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $100.00.
2. Second reading of Ordinance 108-84.
•
3. Approval of Resolution 84-277.
4. Receipt of plans for joint utility system.
5. Receipt of copies of recordable cross easements.
DLO:sg
cc: Walter Carpenter
Terry Schneider
•
111
, � ::d
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services L
DATE: October 11, 1984
SUBJECT: Bids on Installation of Bridges for Staring Lake Trail
On Tuesday, October 9, 1984, the City received bids for the purchase and installation
of the two bridges for the trail around Staring Lake.
The City received 8 bids for the purchase of the two bridges ranging from $12,480
by Continental Custom Bridge to a high of $18,735.20 by Flannigan Sales. The City
received 5 quotes for the purchase and installation of the bridges ranging from
$29,887 by Artisan Construction to a high of $49,450 by Kraemer Construction.
After reviewing these bridge bids and discussion with contractors on the highuinstal-
lation costs, City staff is recommending the City Council to reject all bids at this
':_ time. S
City staff is further reviewing the possibility of reducing the length of the 80'
bridge to a 60' bridge; this would allow the installation to be done by helicopter,
rather than by crane, which would not only reduce the cost for installation but
would also reduce the impact on the park. (A 70 ton crane would require some tree
removal to get near the site.)
•
If additional soil boring information indicates that we are able to install a 60'
bridge in lieu of the 80' bridge, staff would receive quotes for the purchase of the
two bridges. The estimated cost for a 40' bridge and 60' bridge would be around $10,000.
Staff would also recommend that are park maintenance staff install the footings for
the bridges and we would then obtain quotes for placing the bridges on the footings.
i
Staff would estimate that the total cost for the purchase and installation of the
two bridges would be reduced from the low bid of $29,887 to aroTind $22,000.
BL:md Z
•
. s
TO: Mayor & Council
FROM: John Frane
DATE: October 12, 1984
RE: Final approval MIDB'S Portnoy Project - $2,750,000 Resolution 84-287
The final documents have been approved by the City Attorney's office.
Resolution 84-287 will be in the Mayor's signature file.
2 Z
•
•
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THRU: Carl Jullie. City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: October 11, 1984
SUBJECT: 1984 LAWCON Grant Contract
Attached is a copy of the grant contract for the 1984 LAWCON grant for purchase
of a 1.84 acre site adjacent to the 9 acre Riley Lake Park site. The Community
Services staff request authorization to enter into this grant project agreement.
The grant will total $41,500.
BL:md
•
•
•
•
{
' I
22ft//0
STATE OF MINNESOTA •
STATE PLANNING AGENCY•
OFFICE OF LOCAL AND URBAN AFFAIRS
•
•
LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND PROJECT AGREEMENT ' •
City of Eden Prairie 27-01235 --
Local Unit of Government • Project Number
Riley Lake Park Hennepin County
Project Title County
8/23/84 through 12/31/88
Period Covered by this Agreement
PROJECT SCOPE:
The City of Eden Prairie will acquire approximately 1.84 acres as an addition
to the existing 9 acre Riley Lake Park. This acquisition will provide enhanced
public access to Riley Lake and will be developed in the future for outdoor
recreation facilities.
Any reference to the Office of Local and Urban Affairs, State Planning Agency
contained the agreement, or in any attachment incorporated thereto, shall
hereinafter be considered a reference to the Division of Community Development,
Dupartlaeilt—vtzEuet gy dui) E V1:VUIi DevelvpueuL, •
•
ENTIRE PROJECT
'Stage Covered by this Agreement •
•
.eject Cost The following attachments are hereby
incorporated into this agreement:
Estimated Total Cost $ 83,000,00 1. Project Proposal
Fund Amount• $ 41,500.00 2 Contract Work Hours & Safety Standards Act
3,Requirement for Affirmative Action
'Fund amount:This is the maximum amount of federal funds that shall be provided oo the project.
The State of Minnesota,by its delegated official,the State Planning Agency,Office of Local and Urban Affairs,
(hereinafter referred to as"State")and
the City of Eden Prairie
(hereinafter referred to as"local unit") mutually agree to perform this agreement in accordance with the Land and
Water Conservation Fund Act of 19G5(78 Stat.897)and subsequent amendments,the Regulations of the Bureau of
Outdoor Recreation and the following items,promises,and conditions,that are part of this agreement:
The following terms as used herein shall have the following definitions:
1. "BOR"means the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation,United States Department of interior,which administers the
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act.
•
2. "Commissioner"means the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources,State of Minnesota,or any
representative lawfully delegated the authority to act for said Commissioner. The Commissioner is the state
' liaison official for the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act.
3. "Director" means Director of the Office of Local and Urban Affairs,or any representative lawfully delegated
the authority to act for said Director.
4. "Federal Funds" means those monies made available by the United States of America for projects under the
.Land and Plater Conservation Fund Act of 1965,(78 Stat,897).
•
K. COMPLIANCE • •
The local unit shall be responsible for compliance with this agreement by any political subdivision or public agency to which
funds are transferred pursuant to this agreement.Failure by the political subdivision or public agency to comply shalt bet
deemed a failure by the local unit to comply with this agreement.
M. MANUAL
The local unit shall comply with the policies and procedures tat forth in the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation Manual.Said Manual
is hereby incorporated into and made a part of this agreement.
N. SPECIAL PROVISIONS
The following special project terms and conditions were added to this agreement before it was signed by the parties hereto:
Any reference to the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation (BOR) contained in the
agreement, or in any attachment incorporated thereto, shall hereinafter
be considered a reference to the Heritage Conservation and Recreation
Service (HCRS).. •
•
•
•
•
•
•
This agreement shall be binding on the State and the local unit,and the persons whose signatures appear hereon,as
At' authorized by statute and resolution to sign this agreement in behalf of the aforesaid local unit..In witness whereof,the
_
parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the date entered below.
APPROVED: STATE OF MINNESOTA
COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION STATE PLANNING AGENCY
By By DIRECTOR.OFF iCC OF LOCALS URBAN AFFAIRS
•
•
Title Date
•
•
ATTORNEY GENERAL LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
For
CITY,VILLAgE,OR COUNTY
By
•
Title BY AAAYan OR CHAIRMAN(NAME AND TIT LEI
Approved as to form and execution this.
Date
day of
79 By CLERK OH AUDITOR(NAME AND TITLE)
•
Date
STATE AUDITOR
Not Encumbered
SEAL AFFIXED
By •
Date % 7
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #84-274
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CHASEWOOD COMPANY FOR
EDEN COMMONS
8E IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Eden Commons for Chasewood Company, dated July 16,
1984, consisting of 12.5 acres into one lot, a copy of which is on file at the City
Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning
and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of
, 1984.
{
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
•
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
t�l
•
a I )
•
;TAF- REPORT '
10: Planning Commission
;ROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: August 24, 1984
PROJECT: Eden Commons Apartments
APPLICANT/ '
FEE OWNER: Chasewood Development
REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5 for 218 multiple
family units-
2. Review of Environmental Assessment Worksheets•
•
Background _
'- 'IA, 4.:L. / yr L. 213 t
This site . is part of the Preserve 57 % G-REG v
Pia', d Unit Development which par :a '
identified a high density res- '•-"iC fiEG /� �`'
idential land use for this site. l
The Comprehensive Guide Plan also \ 78-56 Cl •
designates this site for high �'� ,-_REG �'
density residential use. The Guide PROPOSED SITE
Plan depicts surrounding future land
uses as primarily commercial to the C RE G
north and west of this site, and low I r -R
density residential and medium - l02`
density residential to the east and FCi ___ v„ »,.�< •+ •it, am_
south of this site. / I I �O4.0A-il t T- )`t 5 1j
{ ♦ F'.el
Previously, the Planning Commission 1 � ,�� , •N • �i' F i
reviewed a multiple family resi- •—1 .it1 IN. t:` I C `
dential request from the Prairie i.. ' �:
Lakes Corporation, for two, three- .:77 ''''., �, .\�,
story, condominium buildings, con- ; .5R3'?0+, , �', ``
taining 172 units, with 218 � 1 ;_i21•IAy '"tt �'�`'
underground parking spaces, and 1-26 \ il i i. Z_,\
surface parking spaces, at a density �-- • �i� {;W ,, -
of 13.74 units per acre. The City C• _• j ??,
Council gave first reading to the �l� " Via.
ord'' 7.nce for rezoning the site from -'_I 4 7A' '
Rur to RM-2.5 and site plan �_ 79-4 ./ 'ff((/�i,; G'•'I r,':'',--T
mroval; ho;eever, second reading is `` .-' •` ,1::,
still pending since the developer's 'I\t l) �,. 7----- '. ... .i`
agreement was not signed by the 1
Prairie Lakes Corporation. I AREA
REq LOCATION MAP
•
( ) . )
EePn Commons Staff Report 2 August 24, 1984
•
•
The Chasewood Company, of Colorado, is proposing a high density residential project
for 218 rental units contained in fourteen two-story and three-story buildings, at
an overall density of 17.4 units per acre. Parking will be provided on surface for
garages and open parking spaces. •
Existing Site Characteristics •
The site is characterized by extreme grade changes, dropping 68 feet from a high
point of 898 in the north-central portion of the site, to an elevation of 830 in the
southeast portion of•the site. The property is steepest in the northern half of the
site, and more moderate slopes occur on the southern half of the site. A
considerable amount of cut and fill will be required to make the site usable for
building development. There is no significant existing vegetation on site. There
are some scattered elms and cottonwood trees along the northern border.
Environmental Assessment Worksheet
An Environmental Assessment Worksheet is required based upon requirements of
Minnesota Statutes requiring such review for multiple family residential projects
involving more than 150 units in a sewered area. A copy of this EAW is attached for
your review.
0.. _.5 Zoning District
The RM-2.5 Zoning District allows up to a maximum of 17.4 units per acre. Generally
speaking, when projects approach the maximum density, they contain larger but fewer
buildings, underground parking, and more open space in larger areas. The previously
approved high density project on this. site by the Prairie Lakes Corporation
•
contained 172 units in two three-story buildings, at a density of 13.74 units per
acre. Approximately two-thirds of the parking spaces, (218), were contained in
underground parking. Buildings with underground parking, allow greater opportunity
for more open space and make the project appear less dense. However, larger
buildings contain considerably more mass and become difficult to treat
architecturally in a sensitive way.
The 218 units proposed are much more residential in scale, since the buildings are
smaller, with varied rooflines and staggered building fronts. The project appears
very tight because of the number of buildings and the number of free standing
garages. Free standing garages and surface parking require a considerable amount of
land area and can reduce the size of open areas, not leaving enough area for snow
storage.
Site Plan
The Eden Commons buildings are arranged in a cluster manner in order to create open
space between the units. This occurs throughout the project with the exception of
dings 8, 13, and 14. The spacing between building clusters varies between 15 to
li, rect. This provides for a series of smaller and intimate spaces which flow into
larger and more open spaces.
Although the spacing between the building clusters is adequate in some areas,
distances less than 40 ft. between clusters becomes very tight. Surface parking and
garages further constrain the site plan. Staff had discussed this issue very early
•
•
Eden Commons Staff Report 3 August 24,. 1984
on in the process with the proponent and suggested alternative ways of dealing with
density and parking, such as on-grade structured parking, underground parking, or
combinations of these alternatives. Staff understands that since the buildings are
small it is not as economically feasible to provide underground parking.
The proponent is requesting front yard setback variances from 35 to 20 feet along
Franlo Road. The proponent contends that the setback variance is necessary in order
to accomnodate grading on site without the use of major retaining walls. However,
when considering the overall tightness of the site plan, Staff does not feel that
the variance has been substantiated.
Parking •
A total of 392 parking spaces is provided on site at a ratio of 1.8 spaces per unit.
Current RM-2.5 zoning regulations require provision of two spaces per unit, or for a
project of this size, a total of 436 spaces. The proponent's narrative indicates
that the parking requirements of approximately 7,000 existing Chasewood living units
are at 1.6 parking spaces per unit.
Of the 218 units proposed, 128 are small, one-bedroom units ranging between 600 to
735 square feet. The remaining 90 units are large single-bedroom units or two-
bedroom units. Considering the size of the one-bedroom unit, Staff would expect
that provision of 1.5 spaces per unit would be adequate, and for the larger one •
-
droom and two-bedroom units, parking at two spaces per unit would be adequate as
well. Using these ratios, a total of 372 parking spaces would be necessary to meet •
minimum demands. Staff expects that for a project of this size, there will be a
need for overflow parking to provide for guests or for parties. Staff would suggest
that an additional one-third parking space per unit would be necessary to provide
for overflow parking spaces. This would provide an additional 72 parking spaces on
site or a grand total of 444 spaces. This is very close to the Code requirement of
436 spaces. Staff would recommend that parking be provided on site at a ratio of •
two spaces per unit.
Grading
Any development on this site will require a considerable amount of cut and fill
since the property slopes steeply in a northerly to southerly direction and drops a
distance of 68 feet. The proposed grading plan involves a series of terraces across
the site to provide for level building pad areas for the building and to accomnodate
parking and driveway areas within allowable grades.
Slopes, for the most part, are at 3/1 or less, with the exception of the slopes
along the north property line which approach 2/1. Some grading work is proposed on
the property to the north which is the proposed location for the Hennepin County
Library. Staff understands that the proponent has obtained permission from the
adjacent landowner to perform this grading.
The proponent is seeking a front yard setback variance to buildings from 35 to 20
.et. The proponent believes that the setback variance is warranted in order to
acco:rrnadate proposed grading on-site and minimize the use of retaining walls across
the north property line. A previous submittal of the proponent had buildings at a
35-foot s.ethac.k along Franlo Road, but also had a series of four-foot high retaining
walls running the entire length along the north property line. Staff feels that the
use of the 2/1 slope, over a short distance of approximately 50 feet, would be
Eden Commons Staff Report 4 August 24, 1984
acceptable from a visual standpoint; however, it would require slope stabilization
with a special highway seed mixture, which has deep rooting capabilities for slope
stabilization. We would also recommend that a significant amount of planting occur
on the slope to visually break up the view of the slope. It is expected that
drainage will be a problem adjacent to the garages across the steep slopes. The
drainage plan should provide a method for draining water away from the back of the
garages. •
•
Several retaining walls are proposed between several buildings on site, adjacent to
Buildings 3, 4, and 5. The height of these retaining walls will be approximately
four feet. The proponent should submit details of the proposed retaining walls for
review, which include structural soundness and type of materials proposed. Building
Code requires that any walls of four feet in height, or greater. need a building
permit.
Utilities
Sewer and water service can be provided to this site by connection to existing sewer
and water lines in Franlo Road and Preserve Boulevard.
Storm water will sheet drain across open land areas into the parking lots and
driveways. From that point, water will be directed towards catch basins which are
•nnected.to a series of storm sewer pipes, which eventually connect to an existing
>rm sewer line in Franlo Road. The proponent should provide storm water run-off
calculations for review by the City Engineer in order to more accurately evaluate
the capacity of the existing storm sewer system to handle the amount of water run-
off anticipated.
Landscaping
The proposed landscape plan depicts the type, size, and arrangement of plant
materials on site. Due to the high density of project, and number of free standing
garages proposed, Staff would recommend that the size of materials be upgraded to
provide for better scale relationships. Staff would recommend that the minimum size
for shade trees be 2-1/2 inches, with a three-inch average, and include at least 20
percent of the shade trees at 4-6 caliper inches. For coniferous trees, Staff
recommends a six-foot minimum height, with an eight-foot height average, and with at
least 20 percent of the proposed coniferous trees between ten and twelve feet in
height.
Code requires that all parking areas he screened from public view. Staff feels that
the proposed landscaping and berming along Preserve Boulevard and Franlo Road will
not be adequate to screen parking areas from public view. Due to the steep grades
along Preserve Boulevard, it will be difficult to provide for effective screening of
parking areas. Staff would expect that screening should include a combination of
berming and plantings. Staff would recommend that additional coniferous trees be
planted along Preserve Boulevard to provide for screening of the parking areas.
king along Franlo Road will be approximately ten feet above the grade of the
road. Some of the parking areas will be screened by the back of the garages, and
some will he screened by the placing of materials on site. Staff feels that
additional plantings will be necessary to provide for effective screening. Staff
would recommend that the proponent provide sight lines across all parking areas to
indicate the effectiveness of proposed screening from public roads.
Eden Commons Staff Report 5 August 24, 1984
The major circulation route through the site would benefit from additional shade
trees, or coniferous plantings, which would help break up the length of the garage
fronts as viewed from these roads. •
Traffic Impacts
The traffic study, prepared by the proponent, was based upon the original plan of
252 units and 15 buildings. Based upon that total number of units, 1,500 total
trips would be generated on a daily basis. This amounts to approximately 6.3 trips
per unit. Applying this factor to the 218 units would result in 1,373 daily trips
generated. Of the total trips anticipated, approximately 67 percent (920) would
utilize Preserve Boulevard to and from the north, 14 percent (192) would utilize
Preserve Boulevard to and from the south, and 19 percent (260) would utilize Franlo
Road to and from the north.
Figure 1 of the traffic report, prepared by Benshoof and Associates, indicates trip
distribution from the Eden Commons project. The distribution diagram indicates the
majority of traffic increase will be towards Prairie Center Drive, #169, and I-494.
•
There will be a moderate increase in traffic along Anderson Lakes Parkway, with the
majority of that traffic directed towards #169 as opposed to County Road 18. •
I -rnal circulation through this site is provided by a major loop road, which runs
f -_. the intersection at Preserve Boulevard and Carriage Road to Franlo Road. There
is a secondary loop road in the northeast corner of the site and a secondary access
provided off Franlo Road. Since the majority of the traffic will be entering this
site off Preserve Boulevard, it was Staff's previous recommendation that the site
plan provide a protected drive along the major route, which is in fact represented
on the site plan. Staff expects that there will be some traffic movement conflict
problems near the Preserve Boulevard entrance because of the number of driveways
entering within a relatively short distance off Preserve Boulevard. Staff would
recommend that the parking area on the north side of the proposed main entrance be
flip-flopped with the buildings such that the parking area would have access off the
first entrance into Building 13. Driveway entrances on the south side of the main
access road could also be consolidated and moved to the west. (See Attachment A).
Preserve Boulevard is a 26-foot wide, two-lane bituminous surface at this time. At
one time, plans envisioned a four-lane, divided road from Prairie Center Drive to
Scotch Pine Court. There are no immediate plans to implement the proposal, but, •
Staff expects that the road may be widened to a two-lane road, similar to Valley
View Road by the high school.
•
Franlo Road is a two-lane residential street at this time. There are no immediate
plans for upgrading it, either. However, Staff expects, with ultimate development
of the property in the area, Franlo would be a widened two-lane road.
Parks/Pedestrian Systems
•
1.0..e Eden Park is located approximately one-half mile south of this site and •
provides a limited amount of neighborhood recreational facilities at this time.
Considerieq the number of units proposed on this site, it might be beneficial to
have a tot-lot facility in addition to the pool and recreation building provided on
site. There should also be a means of internal pedestrian circulation system to
carry potential users to the recreational areas.
A
Eden Coranons Staff Report 6 August 24, 1984
There is an existing eight-foot bituminus trail on the east side of Preserve
Boulevard. Staff would expect that, with ultimate development of the Preserve
Boulevard, there would be a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk provided along the west
side of the road. In a similar matter, Staff would expect a five-foot wide concrete •
sidewalk to be constructed on the north side of Franlo Road, given the ultimate
improvements for that road section. The proponent should modify the site plan to
indicate a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the east and southern property
lines. There should also be a connection point from the internal pedestrian system.
Architecture
A total of 14 two- and three-story buildings are proposed on-site. The building
elevations suggest a strong residential character, with steep rooflines, fireplaces,
and staggered building fronts, which, Staff believes, provides residential scale.
The majority of the building material will be face-brick and glass, and with some
wood used as an accent trim. Garages are proposed to be constructed of a similar
material, with staggered rooflines and steep roof pitches.
The project will provide 137, one-bedroom units ranging in size from 600 to 874
square feet and 74, two-bedroom units ranging in size from 879 to 1,000 square feet.
ConTlusions
Thee are ten apartment complexes in the City, totalling 1,095 apartment units.
Densities for the apartment unit complexes vary from a low of ten units per acre for
Edenvale Apartments, up to 16.8 units per acre for Windslope Apartments. Some of
the apartment complexes, such as Edenvale Apartments and Shadow Green Apartments,
include structured parking, which provides for more open space on-site. Other
apartment complexes provide for on-grade parking and detached garages, such as
Windslope Apartments. Parking for the nine apartment complexes in the City have
been provided at a ratio of two spaces per unit.
A Staff review of the apartment complexes in the City reveals some common
characteristics. The apartment complexes that cluster the units in larger
buildings, with smaller footprints and structured parking, provide for more open
space on-site, like Edenvale Apartments and Shadow Green Apartments. Buildings
proposed in the Eden Commons project might be comparable in scale to the Shadow
Green Apartments, which were constructed at a density of 12.8 units per acre. Other
apartment complexes which provide for smaller building sizes, but with all on-grade
parking, have snow removal and snow storage problems. Free-standing garages are
also a site planning problem, in that it is difficult to make them an attractive
element of the site and to avoid the long, linear garage fronts characteristic of
the Winds lope Apartments.
Staff feels the project would benefit from a loosening-up of the site plan. This
may man a different arrangement of units on site, or a reduction in units. r.
Opcc, :nu up the site plan would also permit buildings and parking to be located on-
sit .ithout requiring setback variances along Franlo Road. Adding more and larger
plat materials on-site will provide for a better scale relationship between
buildings and the site and would provide for more effective screening of the parking
areas from Franlo Road and Preserve Boulevard. Staff feels that the spacing between
units is rather tight and should be a minimum of 40 feet between the buildings. E'
With these changes in the site plan, Staff feels that additional green area can be
t )
(Eden Commons Staff Report 7 August 24, 1984
introduced to break up the overall length of the garages on-site and provide for
more usable and consolidated open space between the buildings. It will also make
the project appear less dense.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff would recommend that the Planning Commission not take action on /'
•
the Environmental Assessment Worksheet at this time, but act to return the item to
the proponent for the following revisions:
1. Revise the site plan to meet the required front yard setback requirement of
35 ft.
2. Revise the site plan to indicate 40 ft. between buildings.
3. Provide for parking on-site at two spaces per unit.
4. Revise the site plan 'to improve internal circulation near the Preserve
Boulevard entrance, consolidating driveway access from Preserve Boulevard by p!
relocating a single driveway further west.
k_ Provide a tot lot area and internal off-road pedestrian system, which
connects to recreational areas and sidewalks.on Franlo Road and Preserve
Boulevard. This would include a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk on both
Franlo Road and Preserve Boulevard.
•
6. Revise the landscape plan to include larger plant materials and screening of •
the parking areas. Proponent shall provide sight lines which illustrate the
effectiveness of screening. Plantings shall be added along the major
circulation routes within the site to break up the long, linear views of the •
garages.
•
7. Provide detailed storm water run-off calculations for review.
8. Submit detailed information regarding the proposed retaining walls
indicating types of materials to be used and structural soundness of the
walls.
9. Modify the grading plan to provide for drainage of storm water away from the W
back of the garages facing the 2/1 slope in the northwest corner of the
site.
•
• ',.
.
. .• 0."•"''''''''.. ."'"'".'. ‘.
. \ .
tt .
. .
..1" . .
, .
11\0
. .
.. .
.
. 1\ . .
•• . 4)-
. •
-10 4'4
— .
• 1 ')‘. '• :---—1...
* •• ' • .
'i • • 1 i •. , • 4: I . ,-)
• ' .----77 t4- .--. 1 • \ ; , l 1 i
.• ....• , 1‘,,T • \ \ '
-- •.--
:.••.---C -- 7.-.:: •. .=- I .,,*
,-- .-4- 1 i • , #
\ \ \ ,7. 4.-• ,r,
\ 1 i
‘?2'•1 ,,———‘ Vi - 1
...
... ._4 ... ..... tc _., tt
_.--• _--z.f.,.\ , , t , A
•u-,--..„------- i
• i, ......---":" -
--'
••
- '
..._ r .‘s \ -.'- ‘,-'.-,. • V• :.1
- •
,.....- \ ' -- -•,_ - t‘
.-- it • t ‘ 1 ' ..•-
ro. ••str11-; / , . r.
• /-- i ., -\ , ril\-----V-
1.
A ' V 4-‹*•.,:..... -i•••+ .
.->,... '.>': • f•
'I •.. . _
\ , •
"t -....4",s . -<:, •. '
.• a \ .,1k. :. ..‘ . \‘
1 •„--'*, ' tls. ' -,, •
.‘. •.:.1, ''''''''''
• V'S t , • s 1 s. .
'//.//1-7 7 \/ •'Y'''-( //4. - / ,
, ' V".- - • , . .
.'" •• . i., ., ;. .."-...„,:..,,,,:.•
\; \ .-
• 0 v.f,,A, ,, V4.....,....•-'t. 4... - .; • Z..4 1
.....
. i '. •! \ :4 1
• 1 . I
..--• ••• .t
I
.....rtt \ : ,t \
A.--- .....\ .• •
t--•1" V '
I \ , •
• l , • ,
•
‘.. I
• \ ;\ \ 1,. I' \ trs. \ •
-
, ! 1 \!
•I
.,....,\—sx \.--- ;, \ ....,---)
\ V----
N ___ ,
,, , .
\ )
P
..-----
...
, 1 „I.:, ,• 0 ).
...._ - \ ,...•••7 •:' .
r -,%_),.i.,,•'s 1 :
,, , . f"-• .
:it. •,, ,,,, . . ••:;, 1 r-
.. 1 .
. ,
. . • •
. , •%
% •
-.7, "'"0 •
i.....1
,,.,.1 ,\-,\C•Tj %....., 7.,,,,,.f;1 f•••;•...„/,1 1"...) it tc-a- S \, A
, .
I ' . ' • I 4:1A qi-- • ,.-‘..`,/.:A- , „ti L.,...„tiv '\ri
i
. ,
. i
STAFF REPORT
•
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
SOUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: September 7, 1984
PROJECT: Eden Commons Apartments
APPLICANT/ •
FEE OWNER: Chasewood Development •
REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5 for 204 multiple
family units
2. A Preliminary Plat of 12.5 acres into one lot
3. Review of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet
Background
is is a continued item from the
.gust 27, 1984, Planning Commission • •
meeting. The Planning Commission
returned the development plans to
the proponent for revisions based
upon recommendations in the Staff
Report of August 24, 1984. The
following issues were raised by the
Planning Commission: densities, _
number of garages, detailed land-
scaping, and provision of a proper
transition to adjoining land uses.
Proponent has submitted a revised
site plan, only. Details relative
to grading, drainage, and landscap-
ing have not been revised. The pro-
ponent is seeking in-put from the
Planning Commission on the revised
site plan and will return at a
subsequent meeting to present and
discuss these details.
Revised Site Plan
•
revised site plan now shows 204
unity contained in 1.4 buildings on
12.5 acres of land at an overall
J
•
Eden Commons (Revised) 2 September 7, 1984
gross density of 16.3 units per acre. Staff feels that the overall site plan has
loosened up considerably through a different arrangement of buildings on site,
reduction in building size, and the provision of smaller buildings, including
Buildings 2, 4, and 11. The consolidation of garages and parking spaces between
Buildings 5, 6, and 7 provides a cleaner curb appeal along the driveway from Franlo
Road.
The rearrangement of buildings on-site now creates a tight relationship between the
buildings and the private drive. In some situations (Building 5 and 8), the setback
is only 15 feet. We feel that this distance is too short, since the buildings are
two and three stories high. Staff would recommend that, in situations where the
entire building is parallel to the private drive, the setback should be a minimum of
30 feet. In situations where the building is at an angle, or perpendicular to the
road, the setback should be a minimum of 20 feet.
Since a very tight relationship now exists between building and parking areas, Staff
expects that it will not be possible to reposition buildings to meet these minimum
guidelines. Staff does feel there is adequate room to reposition Buildings 2, 4,
and 14 to meet these minimum setbacks. However, it is expected that there will be a
need for a reduction in units to meet this minimum requirement for Buildings 5, 7,
8, 9, and 12. Staff would suggest that the end units on Buildings 7, 9, and 12 be
removed and the private drive be located approximately 15 feet to the east and 15
fact to the northwest. With this plan modification, these minimum guidelines can be
. (See Attachment A)
Since the majority of the traffic entering and leaving the site will be utilizing rg
the Preserve Boulevard entrance, Staff feels there should be a revision to the
driveway access points into the parking areas to minimize potential traffic
conflicts. As in the last Staff Report, it is suggested that the driveways be
located further west.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Staff would recommend that the development plans be returned to the proponent
with the following site plan revisions:
1. All buildings should have their lengths parallel to the interior private
roads, with a minimum setback of 30 feet.
2. All buildings diagonal, or perpendicular, to private roads, should have a
minimum setback of 20 feet.
3. Oriveway entrances off the Preserve Boulevard intersection should be
relocated farther to the west.
4. Proponent shall submit a revised grading and drainage plan.
Proponent shall submit a detailed landscape plan.
6. Proponent shall provide storm water run-off calculations for review by the
City Engineer.
, • __
. ., -. . • . , !..,„ . •
. ( ) • ) \
.t
i
- . 1 , 1 7' • . . .• •
I •!, •:, • • '1 i , i , • ' \
! I 1 I
•
, t , 1 1
1........ . . 1.......4. \ ..S' ' \s i 1 li I 1 1 ,
--4.- 4 0) / °5. .- , ''''.t.•.0.- . . .. .:•:-•'-' 7
k,-° 7.. • .
,, .iti / ''' •,,,•••p:.." /*Weil)'
\\4\\
. L‘,,
•l 1, ''. .
.• ,, ....,-
_ • •, „.•.,
..-, .
• e' \ ..„\ --...--.--
'.t .t
.1'f fi,s.f•12' 4 •-'-
'.\•,'.
l .
.1. , . _• __.....
1,- .....• ,
ntifr --f f •
...._. , . .
\ ,1'•
1: i , .•isa. .1-'5-,... ', ' 7 (::\
' '-:"7;-:- .I---,: '', ,•* 0°' ",. , .
. ":.
•sl 1 - r.."-,-,/:".e Al - ,., . 0„.."
i .
._ ,. „ • .
- t•
,I7 r
„ ,- '30 ••
Si
\ ‘• ,' / _. ',.,,,,,,,,,,,i.:0,i , -- ..-
,.-,---1_, //V- 4 '' • / 1"-F.;);,, ,•,l, ,
• ••• ..../ • ,•:>.-7'''— (\ ,
A ti ---17-•,, :‘-?.....0:%.„ , ,..A.c.' b /. 'N'A.1.;;,—.\ \ .
=
Pi 1:1 , .r \ • , , _ =A
I I;I1/.'./;7 -...•....-.,-..-...-_---4,,
• V•V.'N\rs\'...V:..- / 1I //4• N• F‘.4•''. ,-.
.' ).•., wr)./..
.--:-7'----.--/•.-•--.1.."-----.--4"•••(.„1<11-.1-71"+
71i ! i \
\ \\ .•fi44P@i4
,,, .•
j
: ........--_, - ,r.../ E....i. ••,, ,..7,.., 7^), i i 1 t --------7. .-;;--t, i----,
;,I 1 8 _-:-.0--:-....._ i';i •
1 ...-,- • 1
.._._i__._1._ ______---L.._,1_-__,
-
' e 17r) ° .1. \;..
/•' ..' --.----I . .‘f^. ,..;41--"•.. ,:t4_,•,.. , ----,--, . .
'
Ca II. 1
'-t ' • i i I ,i, . ...- t
• ' bl'• ri ' ' 't.',. tr i
11/4 /1 — -, /1„1,., 1 •
',.1$,,I. t.,,/,:.'..7., ..'...../..--- -• .., 11' 11
,..'''•/--,.. '7-2 ' • • ... •• ,, -,•,..•:. i i , 1 .1--,
. ••• / -, .., 1 11-- ' - .,•---- —1_1 • , ;
... `i
v,....,..„.i,.1,;•,,i•;./
---..„..„.... , _..
i t
1,
1
_ ....• ••.__ •...• . 4 . ••
. .
, f•;.••'.`1. .,. . ,
4
i
• i
Pt,triettA fin P r-..1 r"--.-L-tt ti
l'A. .
) )
•
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
SOUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: September 21, 1984
SUBJECT: Eden Commons
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER: Chasewood Companies
REQUEST: 1. Preliminary Plat of 12.5 acres into one lot.
2. A Rezoning from Rural to RM-2.5.
3. A review of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet.
Background
Th's is a.continued item from the
. Plannng Commission meeting. At
that meeting, the Commission had
recommended that the development
plans be revised according to the
recommendations of the September 7,
1984, Staff Report, which included:
1. All buildings, which have
their lengths parallel to
the interior private road,
shall have a minimum setback
of 30 feet.
2. All buildings, diagonal or
perpendicular to private
roads, should have a minimum
setback of 20 feet.
3. Driveway entrances, off Pre-
serve Boulevard inter-
section, should be relocated
farther to the west. •
4. Submit a revised grading and
drainage plan for review. •
5. Provide a detailed landscape
plan for review.
•
:den "lmrons 2 September 21, 1984
•
S. Provide storm water runoff calculations for review by the City Engineer.
Revised Site Plan
The Site Plan has been revised in accordance with the recommendation of previous
Staff Reports. All buildings meet the minimum setback requirements for RM-2.5
zoning, and the setback guidelines from private roads of 30 and 20 feet. Building
14 has been "flip-flopped" with the parking area, adjacent to Preserve Boulevard,
which screens the parking areas, and allows the driveway entrance to be located
farther to the west; thereby minimizing the potential for traffic movement
conflicts.
The total number of units has now been reduced from 204 to 196 units, at an overall
density of 15.7 units per acre. Parking is provided at a ratio of two spaces per
unit, or a total of 392 spaces, which includes 196 garage spaces.
The reduction in units, relocation of the private road, different building
orientations, and increased setback area between the buildings, provides a more open
site plan. The minimum spacing between buildings has increased, from 15 feet on one
of the earlier plans to a minimum of 30 feet for the current plan. In many cases
the setback between is now 40 feet. '
GrL,nq
A revised grading and drainage plan has been submitted, which indicates the extent
of grading work and type of slopes proposed on site. Because of the overall
steepness of the property, any development on this site will require substantial
grading. Concerns raised in previous Staff Reports, were relative to the impact of
storm water runoff on the City's existing storm sewer system, and the slopes along
the north property line. We now know, from conversations with the proponent's
consultant Engineer, and the City's Engineering Staff, that there is adequate
capacity within the existing storm sewer lines to handle the anticipated runoff from
this development. In addition, the majority of slopes, throughout the project, are
at 3/1 or less, with the exception of a 2/1 slope along the north property line.
The height of this slope varies between 18 to 22 feet over a distance of about 50
feet. To minimize erosion, Staff would recommend that a highway seed mixture, or
other types of deep-rooted ground covers, he utilized to stabilize the slopes. In
addition, to help break up the overall length of the slope, several shade and
coniferous trees should be planted.
Landscaning
The proponent has submitted a revised landscape plan which depicts the type, size,
and arrangement of plant materials on site. Previous Staff Reports had indicated a
specific code requirement for screening of parking areas from Franlo Road and
•
Pr-scrve Boulevard• In addition, it was suggested that several larger deciduous and
ferous trees be located on site. to provide a more mature ' look to the project
and to provide scale between the site and the two and three story apartment
buildings.
The landscape plan has been revised to reflect a 2-1/2" caliper minimum with a 2-
3/4" caliper average, and introduces 20'% of the shade trees of four to six-inch
caliper or greater, and 20% of the coniferous trees of ten to twelve feet in height .
•
•
r /
Eden Commons 3 September 21, 1984
•
or greater. Plantings and berming along Preserve Boulevard should provide for
effective screening of parking and garage areas. There is some berming along Franlo
Road, however, the plan utilizes mostly coniferous plantings for screening since
parking is some eight to ten feet above Franlo Road. A typical detailed foundation
plan has been included to show the extent of proposed shrub plantings around the
buildings.
There is now an interior sidewalk system, which provides a connection between the
units and the recreational area on site, and to the sidewalks proposed along Franlo
Road and Preserve Boulevard. The interior sidewalk should be a five-inch thick,
five-foot wide concrete sidewalk.
Although some detailing between the open space clusters between the units occurs, it
does not depict the level of detail represented in the photographs supplied by the
proponent, which shows outdoor spaces in other projects constructed elsewhere across
the country. Staff would recommend that, prior to council review, the proponent
modify the landscape plan to include a detailing of outdoor spaces which encourage
outdoor usage. This might include hard surface outdoor seating areas, picnic
areas, deck areas, and decorative plantings along the walkway which would provide
for an interesting outdoor experience.
Architecture
Th -oposed one-story recreational building should be constructed of materials
(bi,..k and wood) to match the apartment units. Building form and rooflines should
be similar. The proponent should submit building elevations for review.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the request for preliminary plat of 12.5 acres
into one lot, a rezoning from RM-2.5 and a finding of no significance for the
Environmental Assessment Worksheet, based upon the revised plans dated September lg,
1934, subject to the recommendation of the Staff Reports, dated September 21, 1984,
and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Submit details of the landscape plan, which includes provision of
use of outdoor space which might include hard surface outdoor
seating areas, decking, and decorative plantings along the interior
walkways.
2. Prior to Final Plat, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
•
B. Submit detailed erosion and storm water runoff plans for review by
the City Engineer.
3. Prior to Building Permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee on a per unit basis.
• )
•
Eden Commons 4 September 21, 1984
B. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading.
C. Submit detailed elevations of the recreational buildings for review.
4. Concurrent with building construction, proponent shall:
A. Construct a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Preserve
Boulevard and Franlo Road.
B. Construct the proposed interior five-foot wide concrete sidewalk.
4
Ptslning Cocmission Minutes 2 September 10, 1984
Iv. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
A. EDEN COMMONS, by the Chasewood Company. Request for Zoning District
Change from Rural to RM-2.5 for 218 multiple family residential
units, Preliminary Plat of 12.5 acres into one lot, and
Environmental Assessment Worksheet Review. Location: Northwest
• • corner of Franlo Road and Preserve Boulevard. A continued public
hearing.
Mr. Joe Crook, representing proponent, reviewed the revised plans with the
Planning Commission. He pointed that the number of units had been reduced
from 218 to 204. Parking was now shown at two spaces per unit, although
proponents still prefered to use 1.8 spaces per unit. In response to one of
the recommendations of the Staff Report suggesting that proponents locate
• buildings parallel to the interior road with a 30-foot setback to the road,
proponents stated that they would prefer a 25-foot setback.
9 Planner Franzen reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff
Report, of September 7, 1984. He pointed out that there were still several
plans which needed to be submitted before Staff could complete.review of the
revised project, including a grading plan and a landscape plan.
Chairman Bearman stated that he still felt the project was too dense as
shown. He pointed out that he felt there were too many buildings, and that
there was too much of the lot covered by impervious surface.
Marhula asked for a review of the architecture of the project. Mr. Crook
reviewed the elevations with the Commission.
Marhula stated that he felt the spacial relationship between buildings,
particularly in the area between Buildings 11 and 12, was too tight.
Marhula stated that he felt the patios of the two buildings were quite close
to each other, and, in the case of Building 5, the patios would be very
close to the road planned through the site. Some of these space differences
were as small as 15 feet.
•
Hallett stated that he supported the Staff recommendations for "loosening .
up" the site plan.
Chairman Bearman asked about elevators and whether there was a requirement
for them in these structures. Planner Engcr stated that they were not
required in buildings of this size.
I ' Gartner stated that she felt the landscaping along Franlo Road was still a
major concern for the project. .
•
•
"tanning Commission Minutes 3 September 10, 1984
MOTION: '
•
Motion was made by Schuck, seconded by Hallett, to continue the public
hearing to the September 24, 1984, Planning Commission meeting.
Motion carried--5-0-0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1 i
4 •
11
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Jj7
D
MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
Monday, September 24, 1984
8100 School Road
7:30 p.m.
•
•
•
• 3
A. EDEN COMMONS, by the Chasewood Company. Request for Zoning District
Change from Rural to RM-2.5 for 213 multiple family residential
units, Preliminary Plat of 12.5 acres into one lot, and
Environmental Assessment Worksheet Review. Location: Northwest
corner of Franlo Road and Preserve Boulevard. A continued public
hearing.
J'I
•
Planning Commission Minutes 2 September 24, 1984
•
Mr. Joe Crook, architect for proponent, reviewed the changes in the site
plan since the previous meeting with the Planning Commission on September
10, 1984. The number of units had been reduced to 196, additional
landscaping had been located in the areas of concern noted by the
Commission, particularly along the south border of the property, and
building relationships had been revised.
Planner Enger reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report
of September 21, 1984, with the Planning Commission. Marhula stated that,
during review of a previous proposal for multiple residential development on
this site, there had been concerns regarding the property to the west. He
asked Staff if these concerns still existed, or had been mitigated. Planner
Enger stated that the property to the west had been developed as single
family homes. He stated that the concern at that time was how this
development related to the single family homes to the west. Planner Enger
pointed out that land to the west was guided for High Density Residential
development. He stated that the current project would likely have even less
impact on the property to the west, due to the manner in which grading was
being proposed for this site and due to the residential character of the
buildings proposed by the proponent.
Acting Chairman Torjesen questioned what had been done to mitigate the
relationship between the proposed buildings and the existing land use to the
south. Planner Enger stated that the first tier of lots south of the
property was zoned as duplexes. He stated that only one building of. the
Eden Commons proposal was currently facing Franlo Road. Further, the
garages that had been facing Franlo Road were now smaller in size, and
landscaping and berming had been added to screen this area of the Eden
Commons proposal from the property to the south. •
Acting Chairman Torjesen asked for comments and questions from members of
the audience. There were none.
MOTION 1: • •
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Schuck, to close the public hearing.
Motion carried--6-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Schuck, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request by Chasewood Company for Zoning District
Change from Rural to RM-2.5 for 196 multiple family residential units, to be
known as Eden Conmons, based on revised plans dated September 19, 1984,
subject to the recommendations of the Staff Reports dated August 24,-
September 7, and September 21, 1984.
•
Motion carried-6-0-0
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Schack, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request by Chasewood Company for Preliminary Plat of
22J
•
Planning Commission Minutes 3 September 24, 1984
•
12.5 acres into one lot for multi-family residential development to be known
as Eden Commons, based on revised plans dated September 19, 1984, subject to
the recommendations of the Staff Reports dated August 24, September 7, and
September 21, 1984.
Motion carried--6-0-0
MOTION 4:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Schuck, to recommend to the City
Council .a finding of no significant impact for the Environmental Assessment
Worksheet for the Eden Commons development by the Chasewood Company.
Motion carried--6-0-0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #84-275
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SUPERAMERICA
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of SuperAmerica, dated September 12, 1984, consisting of
1.35 acres for Service Station/Convenience Store, a copy of which is on file at the
City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie
Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
3
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of
, 1984.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
•
John 0. franc, City Clerk
_9.
J •
•
YORKTOWN CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC
7390 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH
EDINA,MINNESOTA 55435
B31.8090 '
•
AFFILIATE.
Dr.John F.Allenburg
W.Thomas J.Allenburg MINNEAPOLIS CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC
8361 HENNEPM AVE S.MINNEAPOIR SSAOA
Or.Steven R.Beck 377.7760
Dr.Ronald D.Robinson PRAIRIE VILLAGE CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC
16538 WEST 78TH ST..EOCN PRAIRIE 553A3
mine
September 24, 1984 •
•
Mr. Chris Enger
City of Eden Prairie
}
Re: Super America Access Prsal
Dear Mr, Enger:
l
On last Thursday, September 2e,' our office received oorrespondance dated Sept.
19th from Super America advising us that their new prulx,sed plan includes a
driveway access which extends approximately 37 feet into the state right-of-way
in front of our clinic pxuju L-y, This cane as a total surprise to us having
received no advance notice that consideration was being given to such a plan.
{ t made this news even more surprising was the fact that we had been advised
in a February 13. 1984 letter from Super America that they were "anxious to
cooperate with you (us),/ the city of Eden Prairei and any other affected
property owners in resolving the question of ingress and egress to and from
Highway 5,
We are concerned that road construction will not detract in any significant way
fran an important objective of ours which is to create through our structure and
landscaping a non commercial professional image of a health care facility.
Peeauseaawareness of what is proposed arrived so late, the clinic partners have
had no opportunity to discuss the new proposal or to consult with architectural
or legal advisors, and therefore respectfully request that the Eden Prairie
City Council defer consideration of the Super America request to a later date.
after we have had an opportunity to review the proposed and, it necessary, discuSt
the nutter with Super America planners_
Very truly yours, •
k.
Steven R. I3eck D.C.
1,
Gregory D. Gustafson, Super America
SI33/lw
•
k •
,
•
;+,.1:.,,..^:r. _..F.!+OAD
PHONE•li.^- 9s7•2c31 Got.c•her 5, 1984
The its-notable Wolfgang Pen el, Mayor
+'ity of Eden Prairie
in50 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344
to: Se,per:+;:,erica'a Service Station rrprovcment
A•-ar .:ayor Pcnxel:
Fir n Prairie Family Physicians, P.A. o'copies the site immediately south
of the current Super.'.aerice station. T Lave examined the prol,csals for
. n•_w construction and model rni oat ien of tl:e SuperA:serica site, add have but
one objection.
Our major indentification sign is a timber and brick structure located at
the northeast corner of our property. This sign is directed towards the
intersection of Eden Prairie Road a.1d West 78th Street. It is visible to ,
southbound traffic on Eden Prairie Read, as well as westbound trafficon
West 78th St. We are concerned that the proposed Super%merica fapin g
plan will obscure, and, in fact, obliterate visibility of this sign. Our '
concern to for the following three reasons:
(1) The sign is of major c:,v.,s,.,icial importance. Questioning of our ;
• patients indicates that many w..;e first attracted to our facility by s4
noting the sign.
(2) Over the past four years, we have on a number of occasions sum-
mongd an ambulance in life-thr«ateuing emergencies (acute airway ob-
struetion in an infant, brain t.:rarotrha�e, drahetie cea:a, heart attack,
massive intestinal bleeding aid precipitous deli eery of a preeatnre
infant, etc.). Tn any of :hest, instances, delay in finding our building
could have resulted in a disasCrous out come.
•
(3) Ours is incrcasis ly be•; , an extended-hoes facility - the
only one in tier 7-rah it, :-.rt - ark, it •.o,ild `c iiifi:c•ilt for firs.:-
time pat ienta to 1 re:site our ta:iIi:y :ni:limit a aii,n viatble from the
inter..crtion o: Lien Prairie el ,,;,d t.'cst 75t.ii S:.raet.
�+ouirl request that the City Caw,- ii ttnt-idor a:.uiifying ti-,c S'ipeckssrice
I-,i,d"s.capinq r,qu;r.••.+-i;ts Sc' s,ilo .. ihi11ty of cur siv,n at 11,e intersection
of i',,I,•n i'i sirie Road si.,tt . ..t ,.':h ..1., et as it. is now. The altet,.ative
�
•+ +•:-',,-r out is tl.eoret ically possible,
of .+placing, our s.. ;.lir:p, i.,n �.o. ..
tTle ''T..'1 i n:'• c 55 5'•, 10 f a c ,
ir ye.-.1 a . u: ,r,'s`it-
' a 1 t;.lc , + . i v. I I'! ,i,k Yon 1}r •'ou,r cC.n}.'
'sent w�ul.� .. -.,-.re •1 .' .
s., ,i„r C-.:.,t!:%S.
•
l,is.tun C. I:nrcir+n, i1,D., I';( :.n: ` ,P'.f.P
r,'.i,j j e k \l
STAFF REPORT
•
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: September 21, 1984
PROJECT: SuperAmerica Gas Station
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER: Greg Gustafson, Gustafson and Associates
REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to C-Highway for 1.35
acres.
2. Preliminary Plat of 1.35 acres into one lot.
3. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office to Commercial.
Background , , rr--a (�i�2}p _.,
iWTt�J)_ Y' ..
In .arch of 1967, Sun-Ray DX was .-Lu_h s!7 T i •E l" "
granted a special use permit to .1rh8i2
_ PUB �.,`
of State Highway #5 and County Road 20
#4. The zoning of the property at [OF r-C8OMM PROPOSED SiTE S\�1
that time was "general multiple - '
dwelling/limited cormnercial"° ; ar, '?S` bin
° '*$ 9-7 :/'
With the passage of the Ordinance •
135 in 1969, 9the property was f8•09 "` `F` -` 1-2 17-2 ' i• I /�
�a. 8-10 RM 5 p 1-2 ,°L7-27 / .. F,!c
transferred to the Highway/- /, \y.�E
Commercial Zone and subsequently 3cE PS PRK, ,•� f \; l
placed in the plan study district. •
,z(41ry RM-G5 7 9 ,/ � ,'
In 1974, the property was purchased 1 .,I / ` '
I •
by Q Petroleum. `��/� ;; I•GEv 1/ .
7 I'
In July of 1977, SuperAmerica // „
purchased the property. - �" °' I��; -
SuperAn rica applied for rezoning in // PUB
frcccmber of 1977 to allow an 800 Ste— /'
square foot expansion existing R M Fs5 l
b:>;ldinq for a convenience food - 7,-------]st . Planning Comaission r•e- �conded denial of the request on / r
January 8, 1978 with a five to one (t_
vote. the primary concerns were //�li -
AREA L CA lON MAP 1
•
SuperAmerica Gas Station 2 September 21, 1984
traffic congestion and the additional commercialization of the #5 intersection.
On May 12, 1980, the Planning Commission entertained a rezoning request from
SuperAmerica to C-Highway. The item was continued at the Planning Commission for
several meetings until August 11, 1980 when the proponents indicated that they were
withdrawing their application and would submit a new application for rezoning in the
future.
The site is currently designated as an office land use in the Comprehensive Guide
Plan and is currently zoned Rural-(Plan Study Area). The request to C-Highway would
eliminate the current nonconforming use status designation for a gas station on this
site.
Site Plan
SuperAmerica proposes an upgrading and expansion of it's present facility, which
will require the demolition of the existing buildings and pump islands and a
construction of a new building located closer to the south property line and three
pump islands with a canopy. .
SuperAmerica proposes to build a 3,908 square foot building, at a floor area ratio
of 0.07. The building is located on site meeting minimum setback requirements for
C-Highway Zoning. A total of 15 permanent parking spaces are provided on site.
/ itional parking spaces will be provided on a temporary basis between the pump
..ands. Code currently requires a minimum of ten permanent parking spaces be
provided for service stations.
Access and Internal Circulation
In 1980, when the Planning Commission last entertained a rezoning request from
SuperAmerica for this site, access to State Highway #5 and County Road #4 was one of
the major issues. At that time, SuperAmerica was to share a right-in/right-out
access jointly with COR Property to the west of this site. This would involve a
relocation of the western most driveway entrance farther to the west and the
elimination of the eastern most driveway entrance on State Highway #5. Access also
involved a relocation of the driveway on County Road #4 to the south. Since that
time, the COR Property to the west, was platted with a cul-de-sac which touches the
southwest corner of this site. SuperAmerica will have an access from that cul-de-
sac. Access on State Highway #5 will be a right-in/right-out condition for
SuperAmerica only. The proponent will be required to obtain a permit from the State
Highway Department for work within the right-of-way. A driveway access permit from
County Road #4 will also be necessary.
Internal circulation has changed from the previous proposal with a relocation of the
building closer to the south property line and a different orientation of the pump
islands in a north/south direction, as opposed to the current east/west direction.
It appears that given the typical stacking of cars at the pump. islands, that there
will be adequate space to maneuver around these parked vehicles.
Grading
Since the site is relatively level at this time, with the exception of two pending
areas along the eastern border of the site, a minimal amount of grading work will be
necessary to accommodate the new building and gas pump configurations. Some.
rl��
SuperAmerica Gas Station 3 September 21, 1904
regrading will occur to provide berming for screening of parking areas from State
Highway #5 and a recontouring of the dry pond in the northeast corner of the site.
The proponent should obtain a grading permit works from the State Highway Department
for grading work within the Highway right-of-way.
Storm water runoff will drain in a northerly to southerly direction into the
existing open ditch system within State Highway right-of-way.
Landscaping
The landscape plan depicts the type, size and arrangement of proposed plant
materials on site. Because of the visibility of this site from Highway #4 and •
Highway #5, it will be necessary to screen the parking areas and the pump islands
from view. Berming will provide some screening of the parking and pump island areas
however it will be necessary to supplement this with additional plant material.
Staff feels that the landscape plan will need further modification to provide for
effective screening. Along the northern property line, Staff would recommend that
deciduous hedge be replaced with coniferous plantings which would provide for more
effective and year around screening. Additional coniferous trees will be necessary
along the eastern property line. Coniferous materials should be planted along the
western property line to screen those parking stalls from view.
''here will be a considerable amount of foundation plantings around the building
1 Intained within landscape timber edging. Staff would suggest that a brick material
be used which is compatible with the color and texture of the building. In a
similar manner the proposed screening of the outdoor refuse area should also be
constructed of a similar material. This will provide for greater continuity on
site.
•
Architecture
Building elevations indicate that the primary building material will be face brick.
The front portion of the building will also include a considerable amount of glass.
Around the perimeter of the building will be a four foot wide exposed aggregate
panel band. •
The size of the canopy in plan view is actually larger than the building itself.
Staff would expect that this canopy will very large when viewed from State Highway
#5 and County Road #4. Staff would suggest that the canopy be redesigned in a
similar manner to the SuperAmerica station proposed in City West. (See Attachment
A) This design helps break up the total mass of the canopy. Staff would also
suggest that the canopy be architecturally compatible with the building. Continuity
could be achieved by applying the exposed aggregate panel around the sides of the
canopy. The canopy is considered as an above ground structure per City Code and
will be required to meet the minimum 35-foot front yard setback requirement. The
site plan indicates compliance with this setback.
ighting
A number of lighting fixtures are proposed on site. Lighting fixtures should be a
downcast cut-otf laminar with a maximum height of 20 feet.
Sicinine ':
There are two signs proposed on site. One will be the existing trademark sign
SuperAmerica Gas Station 4 September 21, 19,84
located in the front yard along State Highway #5. The other will be a wall mounted
sign. The proponent should submit details of proposed signage for review. Signs
shall be limited to one free-standing sign per street frontage with the larger size
not exceeding 80 square feet in area or 20 feet in height, and the second sign shall
not exceed 35 square feet or eight feet in height. The pump canopy shall not have
signage and signage on the building shall be in compliance with City Ordinance. •
Pedestrian Systems
In order to facilitate bicycle and pedestrian access to the store, an eight-foot
wide bituminus pathway should be placed within the property along the west side of
County Road #4. This will connect with the future pathway required of the property
to the south and to the existing pathway adjacent to the Prairie Village Mall north s.
of Highway #5. In addition, a sidewalk leading directly from the store to County
Road #4, should be added. All sidewalks, with the exception of the County Road #4
trail, shall be five feet wide and five-inch thick concrete.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS ' .
Staff would recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office to
Commercial, a Preliminary Plat of 1.35 acres into one lot, and a rezoning from Rural
to C-Highway based on plans dated August 10, 1984, subject to the recommendations of
the Staff Report dated September 21, 1984, and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: •
A. Modify the building plans to provide a modified canopy in a manner
similar to Attachment A.
B. Revise the landscape plan to provide for screening of parking and k.
gas pumps from public roads. :
` s7,
C. Modify the site plan to provide an eight-foot wide bituminus walkway
along the west side of County Road #4 and an internal five-foot wide
concrete sidewalk connection from the store to this bike trail.
2. Prior to Final Plat, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed erosion control and grading plans to the City
Engineer for review.
3. Prior to Building Permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
B. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of . 1,
grading.
C. Stake the grading limits with a snow fence.
D. Obtain access permits for driveway access within State Highway and
County Highway right-of-ways.
•
Sup rAmerica Gas Station 5 September 21, 1984
E. Obtain grading permits from the State Highway and Hennepin County
for grading work and highway right-of-way.
•
F. Submit signage details for review.
4. Operation of the store must be in compliance with the City Ordinance
including limitation of outdoor display areas to no more than ten percent of
the buildings square footage area.
1
I
's
a
i
'i
1
- i
./
•
1
-; 1 i
••• • .
t , '.
4' f ..
- -,•,". • ...! I,,r".•fr: , , i 4 '
, '..1'1, •,.', '''1U''''•••.' 1 !
• 1 - .
‘'.. ' '1.• " •- - • '"" •cti=•. 1. 1 .
• , , y 41,.1'k..'• ', . 'il
. s.1.'..4.:‘.4.'Ir •./ "1 'f,
• . ,
1 11, (‘ ) ".'!
, .
,. ''' :L-4 ti-"''''''•`1''1 1 I
. 4'. 1 I 11., 11 it• ' i
',: I ::'7". __[ref...AS.1'111 : j II • ,
. / jj '..........-.,,-•:,/,:•..i,4•!•1'.” i 1J11. `,1 :11 --..'"";.:.;,-, 71:,_•.!, : ,.11 ,
..:4
I qd 6' " ' , - --'..."..1`A.,.•.
,—. /4,1 , . A i _ I-t,... • „
1 t.,.y.,;.•".,7 '-'-': 7' • ` 1 :
1 : ,
:, P1,.., P...L.1,,,..• .._;' II •;
,,.. •, •.' •
•7 ..• ,...:..:f• ...-\.,' ..•..'....
.•.' .1‘i•
.,,,,i, .1'I 1 T.1I,:..I1__.',,..,.-.—,t;-,-.,:...:.7-,.1,-\...'!1--'.:-.:..•.;,.,•:.;.i.:-o-r, hr
1 : 4 . I f1
.
•
i • '.:-: ..:
.•
. .
.— - • ' ' -1. :.• 1 ', •.! '',.-1 =,i),'...-.. ----z1-L.-_z.,f 11 1'1 r, ..• ,
„. .. '1 .. . i . ,..,4-,,,I, • 1, . :7- • ,i 'LI A . E.•
. • !I .t.11.. ?.?_,..i , 1 / ,ii .4 < •.
? ‘,.i, i .. ,..-...1• i, .• ; 11----:1,) 1 ' • 1 it . .
•
. . '11 . • 's". 1/' s-'/.' ' 't.';....--:.l';'i 1 ? 4 1
• . '‘ ',i k ' ': 'N 1'1 '''i t..!',174._-;,':. :'. 5 i:, i a• :
,„.• „ •
;1' l,--4-''. ).;-;4-''''''.• St ' 1.: , . .
.; 1 • .. , 1 .,
. •• t,-,-.•...7_,,.f.. .. .0 .
LL1
• Ii .,-.,..• ". ; , ,.,. /,--,,,,_nyi : • . ,:
. ) i .,,=..............,•„.,
, • i ! i: i . ..- .7:'•:-,..7.:'•:•.,...- a •i''‘I' ‘\'
:. ,...; i .r; '...- :tItti; ,Y,:tri,11,,,,--t 4.4: 7 l•
,..„4—_,..„,,,, , . l ''' •
• ; 1 i .. 'N:,'fly,• ;-;-....:, ,. ,,, ,..fe, . .
.-. 1. - 4 —•i"o`'''' ' .,;' 4' ti) ,
• • •• • :' •.,,i ?1 ••.^c0-' 1 •••••,) .
, , !V, t •\_._,•,,,.e.,--'-•- .....i LLI _. ,
; .• . 0 . . • • : ,.. . - , /
, • • 1':' . , ' • 7.- ' , .(..) • ,•-•• : :
1 .
-.,1-- ;', -.-3 I" i, •:\,.'
,••
r.N-. ,,' • .14,;,` ' ,-•-.:4-0---.•'. -:-:,--'; ';. li 1- ' Z
,.'„.••!, .
_. -••\:, .•CA. in ,,; LI-1
• ''') ., ..
l .--,:i ........._.,...,), .4 ,S
r•1\ rs .,
„.Y',;'<-' •
LLI . •
1,-,..../,','-'••• —.,..-:1--) i, .\'0\:"'/Iirb.\k!':•tr,lki(•''. •,-"' f7-' rr...7-L..".:c_..1,'..----•'%'',---' 1 .,4*•'.'`:',..
,..y, ., ,... • 1 ,7', , , ,I
...„
t',',;`;';\',•)",:'' '\'‘.'''t.:,;',1•e\„•..'i-s-,'., , 7-.•-:".--L:i.1:;.'';:e .:\, -'• Z .
'..,,,,' .::c's•':::;',,;.. ..-A,,,_ •1........`p•`,*, ,...,....:o •,.' p ...;1•1„i‘.4,.p. , . . ..-;;.,1.•_,,r••.,:-,:• ?I • .
,,,,,,,-,-„-^-.:-,„,.k. ,\V‘1,4 ..a''';'>.'') ,. ..:*;,•,-.••‘‘.1' .''';,' ,IV ' i • "-.44, '.," s''t ' 0 ' ,
.'
' .1. -"•••! /1 ‘‘..s.,•,—„,47'.T!,....':,"\;';".s.:•''-•, l''''' ',44 •.'1‘\ •, '11. ,-. ;i17`‘Z..'', .1 U
1..... -.,•,.;' ' ,- I-.0,,'•.i '1 1
7 ,:'•--," ,-!..S1 ".".':•-..',.? .. „.,,-,----`.::::':lz.'' ••••!, - --:•.--------- --'''-'1'.A..i r‘,
\
• . ,..., .‘ .. ---.,\... '..- 74' '•'..'.',-;•••:-----;' ....ij'"Iit'\\1 L' :' '`-• •••••',i" :'1\(4;\
''1:" i\‘`.,• `.,‘•'''''‘Jt`' .• ",-'4",----". -' / '- '•..s.
.‘•\\:•.,-- r• I Z . • „
•
•-,•)-... -. . , - - -\; , , • ••••' .• \ • c '.• ., ..•• 'i.11 ( 1-,..
.,,,.....,.,.,‘, :7_7 j. ....._ ,....10. .,....-'",.',..,'•Z`!",`7,.-7--.".-"` --7 -....'.'," .s:' j ').,;(1. - 0 :
▪ '...•...;%'''1- ' .;,.-;'•.‘2' .....-,',• '',.'?'• .-‘ 0, '‘': 1 ,‘.,•: ••,/.:1•4\r -* —
i— • ...
..11\,, .. ,,, , , ,„...,.../..... ,
‘f•-...•"‘`• ••1-,- ' •'-' ' a . *4.!
')....,N, ..'t, IT:.:‘,-:.::7'..''. -•1.:**-.. ••...::..:. li .'^- '`"•••"-''''. --..."-;„'.i 11.t.•',. }—
\-,•,;:,:.,, •,...,-••, -::‘'',.••. • -: .A ,,';' ,.s. .. • .':::(7.,.,i'.1 ,...:.,,',' V) 11 '( r.....0-....:-..:.1....:_,,..:::.%...*:...>... ... -- •..'c'' 76 •..:.....::..... ..'',..,',I•1`,12..
•-. .. . , • I
• , . •
. • • .• L.)
. • i ..
• • . ,
. . ..i. 1
--.\--:-.,;--'-..•.- ,---• ;,.• "1— „
. ...) -•.: /
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
D. SUPERAMERICA. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to C-
Hwy and Preliminary Plat of 1.35 acres for Service
Station/Convenience Store. location: Southwest quadrant of County
Road #4 and Highway #5. A public meeting.
Mr. Greg Gustafson, representing SuperAmerica, reviewed the site plan and
site characteristics of the project with the Planning Commission. Planner
Enger reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report of
September 21, 1984.
Acting Chairman Torjesen asked that the letter received from Mr. Steven
Beck, Eden Prairie family Physicians, be included as part of the permanent
record for this project. Mr. Beck's letter expressed concern regarding the
potential of the landscaping to block view of the sign for their property to
the south of the proposed SuperAnierica site.
Gartner asked if the landscaping proposed would'possibly block sight lines,
or cause traffic difficulties for Highway #5 or County Road #4. Planner
Enger responded that the Planning Staff would need to review the landscaping
very carefully at the time of its final submission prior to building permit
issuance for this purpose.
Hallett asked if there would still be full access available to this site
Planning Commission Minutes 10 September 24, 1984
from Terry Pine Drive in view of the fact that direct access from the south
from County Road #4 would be eliminated in the future. Staff responded that
there would be full access from Terry Pine Drive.
Mr. Steven Beck, Eden Prairie Family Physicians, located south of the
project, stated that he would be willing to work with the proponents
regarding this concern of potential blockage of their sign due to
landscaping. Mr. Gustafson responded that he, too, felt the matter could be
handled privately between two individuals.
Marhula asked if Terry Pine Drive had been completely constructed. Planner
Enger responded that the cul-de-sac had been completed. Marhula asked if
site plans were available on any of the other sites within this vicinity, in
particular within the commercial Planned Unit Development to the west. He
stated that he was concerned that the driveways and access situations for
the properties involved be appropriately planned. Planner Enger responded
that this site plan for the entire area had been previously reviewed and
that access questions had been answered. The SuperAmerica site, as
proposed, fit in well with the other commercial uses in the vicinity with
respect to access.
Acting Chairman Torjesen asked if access to the cul-de-sac had been shown in
the original SuperAmerica plan. Planner Enger responded that it had been
shown. Acting Chairman Torjesen asked about parking on the site. Mr. Steve
Amik, representing SuperAmerica, responded that the parking shown on the
east side of the site had been designated for employee purposes. Acting
Chairman Torjesen suggested that parking could be located closer to the
building for customers.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Marhula, to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried--6-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Schuck, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Superamerica for Zoning District Change
from Rural to C-Highway for 1.35 acres for a service station/convenience
store, based on plans dated August 10, 1984, subject to the recommendations
of the Staff Report dated September 21, 1984, with the following additions:
Under recommendation #lb, add the following "and not to conflict with sight
lines from County Road #4 or Highway #5;" and add a recommendation #1d
stating, "Meet with property owners to the south to mitigate issues
regarding visibility of the signage for the property to the south."
Motion carried--6-O-0
MOTION 3:
•
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Schack, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Superamerica for Preliminary Plat of 1.35
Planning Commission Minutes 11 September 24, 1984
acres into one lot for a service station/convenience store, based on plans
dated August 10, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report
dated September 21, 1984, with the following additions: Under
recommendation #1b, add the following "and not to conflict with sight lines
from County Road #4 or Highway #5;" and add a recommendation #1d stating,
"Meet with property owners to the south to mitigate issues regarding
visibility of the signage for the property to the south."
Motion carried--6-0-0
•
}
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #84-276
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PRIMETECH II FOR
PRIME OEVELOPMENT
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Primetech II, for Prime Development, dated August 24,
1984, consisting of 4.0 acres into one lot for construction of a day care center, a
copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the
provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments
thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of
, 1984.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
i. ) (. ) .
STAFF REPORT . .
•
•
TO: Planning Commission •
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
THROUGH: . Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: September 21, 1984
PROJECT: Primetech Park Phase II
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER: Pat Hagen, Prime Development
REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development District Review on 20 acres. 1
2. Zoning District Change from Rural to C-Regional Service.
3. A Preliminary Plat of one acre into one lot.
•
Background _ __ •
Si-•^e the completion of this Staff _ _ '
^R�M.f [T ail_'\
g .rt Primetech has revised their
\ 5r
request to rezone from Rural to C- 353 0 6
Regional Service, and a Preliminary \ OFC ;OFC
Plat of one acre into one lot for a I .\
day care center only. Primetech is •
in the process of changes to the • .2.".: -UFC�
office buildings and would prefer to • . - . - . PROPOSED SITE
return to the Commission when plans 0v •
are more definitive. The Staff 1;7 :c;''' _
Report is based on the original v•
request and perhaps for the benefit l)L I•FAMILY > --Y7- :a
of the proponent some direction on ;. OFFCE S 1r` " ' h II
the key issues such as screening and �� .- OP4.i
COMM-COMM PAC
the looping of the interior private i -
road would he appropriate. The re- l ,1� �",, N.,�/ "
corrnendation will be based on the ';'•\
day Giro center only. �+' �i 4,� �C-H1h
--, �,� i--tom,_,.
This site is part of a 20-acre $• \ ;g; / 121—
Planned Unit Development Amendment
to the City Hest Planned Unit I �
P velopment reviewed by the Planning • 68I-2• g, )`�` ,.) Ilk
Caxuission in December of 1983, for � i 791 .3
O;fic:e/Research and Development i \, / , 12 R C
,bleb includes several build- / •
i;rgs totalling approximately 181,000 r {i , - �..•,,�. �
sg��are fret. the proponent is ill (�1,� .� I-7 79 3%'"
requciting a revision to Phase II, _--
AREA LOCATION MAP •
•
Primetech Park Phase II 2 September 21, 1984
which was previously approved for 39,000 square feet of office use in three
buildings.
Phase I of Primetech Park was approved in December of 1983. Three of the four
buildings are currently under construction.
The Comprehensive Guide Plan identifies an Office land use for this site.
The existing site character can best be described as relatively level, ranging in
elevation between 880 and 890. There is no existing significant natural vegetation
on this site.
Land Use
Three separate land uses are proposed on this site which includes a 3,000 square
foot daycare center, a 12,000 square foot office building, and a two-level, 19,000
square foot, office/research and development building. Although three separate
zoning changes are requested, Staff feels the uses are compatible. The daycare
center will offer childcare services for the employees of the park with children.
The proponent will be seeking a variance under the PUD to allow up to 100% office in
the area proposed for I-2 zoning (see attachment A). Parking is provided at five
spaces per 1,000, which suggests that the building would be more office than
industrial use.
e developer's agreement for Primetech Park, approved in March of 1984, indicates
that the overall Planned Unit Development Concept should not be less than 65 percent
office usage to be determined based upon the individual uses proposed in the overall
Planned Unit Oevelopment Concept.
Site Plan
The proposed site plan is similar to the concept plan originally approved for this
site. There are three buildings totalling 34,000 square feet of area as compared
with 39,000 originally approved under the Planned Unit Development. The daycare
center, at 3,000 square feet, is approximately 2,000 square feet smaller than the
office condos, originally proposed in that location. The office and office/research
and development buildings are comparable in size to the original concept with the
proposed office building 2,000 square feet smaller, and the research and development
office 1,000 square feet smaller. The original concept plan had three, one-story
buildings. The new concept plan has two, one-story buildings, and one building with
a second level.
Staff would suggest that the site plan for the day care center be "flip-flopped" to
provide a cleaner office look on City West Parkway and to keep the play area farther
away from the high traffic volumes. The play area should be screened from the
interior private road.
No variances are proposed with this phase. Internal lot line setback variances for
ri:inq were approved under the original Planned Unit development Concept.
A total of 1R2 parking spaces arc provided on site. If figured at five spaces per
1,000 of office area, a total of 170 spaces would be required. All parking stalls
arc a standard 9 x 19-foot size with a 25-foot isle provided. Although City Code
does not have a specific Code requirement for day care centers, parking typically is
ne aid for permanent Staff only. stalls are provided. Staff feels this is
adeouate.
•
Pri:,,rtech Park Phase II 3 September 21, 1984
Access •
The main access to this site will be from a private roadway which intersects City
West Parkway at two full access points. One access point is currently under
construction with Phase I, the second main access point is planned to be constructed
concurrent with Phase III. Primetech originally had proposed a temporary access
drive immediately adjacent and north of the daycare center parking area; however,
the Anderson Development Company would not allow such a temporary access to occur.
This temporary access drive would be a protected lane and would provide a right-
in/right-out only access to City West Parkway. Primetech has proposed another
alternative of providing a temporary access to City West Parkway through the parking
lot of the daycare center. Staff feels that this would not be practical over the
long term because of the potential for traffic movement conflicts in a non-protected
parking area. It may suffice as an interim use provided that the loop road planned
as part of the overall original Planned Unit Development would be completed within
18 months of the issuance of the first building permit for Phase II. The
developer's agreement for Primetech indicates that the loop road be completed
concurrent with Phase II.
Grading
A general way of describing the grading on site is that the small knolls will be cut
fill the lower areas on the site. The finished floor elevations of the building
`,„tl be approximately 20 to 25 feet above the elevation of Highway #169. This means
that this site will be highly visible and screening of parking areas will be
difficult by berming alone within 17-1/2 feet of setback area. Screening will be
discussed in more detail in the landscape section.
There will be some grading work occuring outside of the boundaries of the property
within Highway right-of-way. The proponent will need to obtain permits from the
Highway Department. •
Landscaping
A Landscape plan has been submitted, which depicts the type, size, and quantities of
proposed plant materials. Staff is comfortable with the type and size of plant
materials proposed. Plant material sizes in this landscape plan are considerably
larger on the average than the typical landscape plan which is proposed at a 3-1/2
inch .average for shade trees and a six-foot minimum height for coniferous trees.
Staff estimates that the average size for shade trees will be between 4-1/2 to 5-
inch caliper with some shade trees between six and eight-inch caliper. The average
height of the coniferous trees is twelve feet with some proposed between 14 and 16
feet in height. Staff feels that the size of plant materials will provide an
icnediate mature look to the project.
Screening of parking areas from highway f169 is proposed to be accomplished with a
,nmhination of a four-foot high brick screening wall, berming, and plant materials.
:oe site section•. have been provided across the parking area which illustrates the
effectiveness of screening. Sections H and C indicate that effective screening can
he irovided, however Section A indicates that cars will be visible from Highway
'I69. We would recoccnond that the height of the wall be increased approximately one
foot to provide for more effective screening.
•
Primetech Park Phase II 4 September 21, 1984
Plantings proposed on top of the berm between the proposed screening walls should be
intensified to provide a more solid screening. We would recommend additional
coniferous trees in this location.
Screening of the play area can be accomplished in a number of ways including the
brick wall, berming, plantings, or combination thereof.
Architecture
The proposed architectural style and building materials will be comparable to what
was approved and currently under construction in Phase I. The primary building
material will be a brown-toned face brick with an architectural dark brown metal
panel. There will be dark bronze windows surrounding the perimeter of the builing.
The architectural mass of the buildings will be softened somewhat by the use of
building projections and rounded corners. The building mass has changed somewhat
from the originally approved concept plan since a two story building is proposed.
Staff believes that the additional two stories will provide a more interesting look
to the development.
Utilities
Sewer and water service can be provided to these buildings by connection to existing
sewer and water lines proposed in the private roadway which connects to existing •
"nes in City West Parkway.
The majority of storm water runoff will sheet drain across the parking areas into
catch basins. Approximately half of the storm water runoff will flow in a northerly
direction toward City West Parkway with a balance of storm water runoff flowing in a
southerly direction to existing storm sewer system in Highway #169 right-of-way.
Signing and Lighting
The signing and lighting program for Phase II should be consistent with the overall
signing and lighting program for Primetech Park. The proponent should submit
details of proposed signs and lighting for review. Lighting should be a maximum of
20-foot high and downcast cut off luminars.
Pedetrian _tems
The overall concept plan for Primetech involve a pedestrian system which planned a
five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the southern side of the proposed internal
loop road and a series of sidewalks from each individual use to that main walkway.
A series of pedestrian systems is planned in Phase II. It is recomnended that these
be completed concurrent with building construction.
Coneiccions
Although the request for overall review has been withdrawn, Staff offers the
,llo,rinq observations for the benefit of discussion. The proposed land uses on
-le, !hounh not purely office space, can be considered comhatible land uses.
Daycare facilities are a necessary and practicle use relationship for the benefit of
office workers in the park and the proposed industrial zoning must have a minimum of
65 percent office. The appearance of the industrial buildings are examples of "high
tech" with brick and glass all around the building, minimal and effectively screened
i
Primetech Park Phase II ' 5 September 21, 1984
loading facilities, parking at five spaces per 1,000, and substantial landscaping.
The development will have a definite office appearance when viewed from City West
Parkway and Highway #169. Variances for percentage of office and parking setbacks
were identified under the original Planned Unit Development, and total square
footage of 34,000 square feet though somewhat less than the original concept plan.
A secondary access proposed to this site may be acceptable on a temporary basis
provided the loop road is completed within one year of the issuance of the first
building permit for Phase II.
Screening of parking areas from Highway #169 can be accomplished by increased wall
height and additional plantings.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the development plans of Primetech Phase II
including a Planned Unit Development District Review for 20 acres, a rezoning from
Rural to C-Regional Service, and Preliminary Plat of one acre into one lot based on
plans dated August 24, 1984 subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report,
dated September 22, 1984, and subject to the following conditions:
1. • Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Modify site plan to "flip-flop" building and outdoor play space.
2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed erosion control, grading and drainage plans to the
Watershed District for review.
•
B. Submit detailed erosion control, grading and drainage plans to the
City Engineer for review.
3. Prior to Building Permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
8. Revise the landscape plan to provide for effective screen of the
parking areas from Highway #169.
C. Stake the grading and construction limits with a snow fence.
D. Notify .the City and Watershed at least 48 hours in advance of
grading.
' E. Obtain permits and approvals from the State Highway Department for
grading work and Highway right-of-way.
ti
F. Submit signing and lighting details for review.
4. Concurrent with building construction, proponent shall:
A. Construct a sidewalk along the side of the proposed internal private
. roadway and all proposed sidewalks within the development.
Primetech Park Phase II 6 September 21, 19$4
5. The private roadway extension shall be constructed to City standards.
6. Within
p8roadths willfbethe issuance of the constructed to Cityfirst buildin West Parkway9 permit for Phase II,
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
.. /
. •
•
.0...1.'1 .. : •, f.......,'S,''...•::.'. .i'.J''':.., ...,' . . . .
/... J `vlii
•
:.;'r , • �i' $'-0' S�. back _1
,v/
Fro .4 r\<7?. /� '`' •
\ 4- 0
•
• • 0\ • T 1.- •. . ,a,,,0....q, .
1CKA )
• -, tz-l. IIV . ...
5�� .., ,ft . . . - . :
• D1ILAN
1a1 s
. 5�'' -te a�' `,<I;
�G �• ���. •`
.......... ..,•;:"SC'-1,.-,S-\ \\ - 4",\- :
• r�1 ` \-. \( ;',,.-.-fir, �'� �
Planning Commission Minutes 13 September 24, 1984
F. PRIMETECH II, by Prime Development. Request for Planned Unit
Development District Review of 20.0 acres; Zoning District Change
from Rural to Office, Commercial-Regional-Service, and I-2 for 4.0
acres; and Preliminary Plat of 4.0 acres into one lot for
construction of an office, a day care center, and an office/service
structure. Location: North of Shady Oak Road, East of City West
Parkway. A public hearing.
Mr. Ron Erickson, architect for proponent, reviewed the site plan and site
characteristics with the Planning Commission. Planner Enger reviewed the
findings and recommendations of the September 21, 1984, Staff Report. A
suggestion made within the Staff Report included "flip-flopping" the
building and the orientations of the uses on the site.
Hallett asked proponents what their opinion was regarding the "flip-
flopping" of the structure and play area. Mr. Erickson responded that they
had reviewed this suggestion and were amenable to either site design.
• Marhula asked if children would be dropped off, or if the parents would be
required to park and bring the children into the buildings. Mr. Erickson
responded that the building had been designed for a drop-off situation.
Acting Chairman Torjesen expressed concern for the potential of other uses
within the Primetech area being routed through the day care center until
direct access to City West Parkway north of the day care center site had
been accomplished.
Marhula suggested the construction of a pedestrian island within the parking
lot so that the children would be able to cross the parking lot when
necessary to other cars in a safe situation.
Mr. Erickson stated that he would be willing to work with Staff to mitigate
the situation regarding possible through traffic through the day care center
site prior to construction of the loop road through the Primetech project in
the future. lie stated that they would prefer approximately two years
instead of eighteen months to accomplish the private loop road through the
overall Primetech development.
Acting Chairman Torjesen reiterated concern regarding possible through
traffic through the day care center site. He stated that he did not feel it
would he appropriate to even allow such traffic on a temporary basis.
Acting Chairman Torjesen suggested that perhaps the loop road could be
eliminated as a requirement at this time; however, the solution to
appropriate traffic circulation should be solved prior to any additional
development within Phase II of the Primetech property. Other Commissioners
concurred.
Acting Chairman Torjesen asked for comments and questions from members of
the audience. There were none.
MOTIO�d 1:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Schuck, to close the public hearing.
•
Motion carried--6-0-0
Planning Commission Minutes 14 September 24, 1984
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Marhula, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Prime Development for Planned Unit
Development District Review of 20.0 acres and Zoning District Change from
Rural to Commercial-Regional-Service for approximately one acre for a day
care center, based on plans dated August 24, 1984, subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 21, 1984.
Motion carried--6-0-0
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Marhula, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Prime Development for Preliminary Plat of
approximately four acres into one lot for a day care center, based on plans
dated August 24, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report
dated September 21, 1984.
Motion carried--6-0-0
t
. 3
. 1.
0i:L .;,t 16,1984 .
16( LANCE ENTERPRISES FREIGHT CHARGES-COMMUNITY CENTER 88.50
16212 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 4751.27
16313 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 1172.90
16314 GRIGGS CODPER & CO INC LIQUOR 3354.72
16315 INTERCONTINENTAL PCKG CO WINE 79.30
16316 QUALITY WINE CO WINE 1423.77
16317 TWIN CITY WINE CO WINE 872.05
16318 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 1559.36
16319 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO WINE 89.65
16320 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR WINE 1663.95
16321 DANA GIBBS SEPTEMBER PACKET DELIVERIES 39.00
16322 NATIONAL REGISTRY OF EMERGENCY SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 15.00
16323 RALPH KRATOCHVIL INSTRUCTOR-EXERCISE CLASSES/FEES PAID 17.00
16324 NATHAN B DEAM REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 9.00
16325 SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTERPRISES INC OCTOBER 64 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 3851.42
16326 HENNEPIN COUNTY BAR ASSOC CONFERENCE-MANAGER 17.00
16327 TNlY HELGERSON REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 24.00
16328 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 9/28/84 17665.33
16329 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 9/28/84 9105.58
16330 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS PAYROLL 9/28/84 12912.39
16331 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 9/28/B4 35.00
16332 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO PAYROLL 9/28/84 114.00
16333 GREAT WEST LIFE INSURACE CO PAYROLL 9/28/84 4039.D0
16334 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS PAYROLL 9/28/84 100.75
16 ; SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK PAYROLL 9/28/84 37.50
16 PERA PAYROLL 9/28/84 15133.59
16328 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 9/28/84 17665.33
16329 COMii4ISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 9/28/84 9105.58
16330 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS PAYROLL 9/28/84 12912.39
16331 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 9/28/84 35.OD
16332 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO PAYROLL 9/28/84 11.4.00
16333 GREAT WEST LIFE INSURANCE CO PAYROLL 9/28/84 4039.00
16334 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS PAYROLL. 9/28/B4 100.75
16335 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK PAYROLL 9/28/84 37.50
16235 PERA PAYROLL 9/28/84 15133.59
16337 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE CO INSURANCE 75D.36
16338 GROUP HEALTH PLAN INC INSURANCE. 2019.76
16339 MEDCE.NIERS HEALTH PLAN INC INSURANCE 4856.15
16310 PiIYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN INSURANCE 11807.39
16311 APPLE SIDE ORCHARD EXPU SES-KIDS KORNER 16.00
163;2 TREASURER STATE OF MINNESOTA LICENSE FEE-FUEL TAX 10.00
16313 QUALITY WINE CO LIQUOR 1425.87
16314 INTFRCONTINE:NTAL PCKG CO WINE 254.83
163'S PAUSTIS & SONS CO WINE 372.88
1635 TWIN CITY WINE CO WINE 236.35
16 w/ 1A LL WINE CO WINE 441.60
162';U ED P HIILIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 4765.61
163;1 LIY:N PRAIRI4: C0I''4CRCE & INDUSTRY CONFERENCI-CITY HALL 239.03
1. 0 J,MK1-NORTHCfl I )PIRIIES OCTOB R 84 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 3732.28
If GI1G;S COOL :R & CO INC LIQUOR 4588.38
12.-, , ,J;ON BK OIHiRS WhflLLSAI.E LIQHO;t WINE 1161.3/
16. ,J I'R10'1 WlNf CO WINE 221.5?
162J. SINL LY OLSON WAGf.S-TEEN V0i11',;TLER PROGRAM 57.20
lt3 _, S1AIC OF '•IINNfSOTA BIKE. RE_GI',TRATIONS/FF:11S PAID 39.OJ
16=Sd UNIVLRSITY OF MINNESOTA CONI IRENCI:-STREET DEPT 130.00
17-1109/2 . I
16357 SUBURBAN UTILITIES SUPTS ASSN CONFERENCE-WATER DEPT 30.00
16358 WENDY BURNS CARLSON SKATING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 375.60
1635+ RALPH KRATOCHVIL INSTRUCTOR-EXERCISE CLASSES/FEES PAID 17.00
16360 CARALEE ANDERSON REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 12.00
16 CAYLA BUELL REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 14.00
16.1>_ JEFF FORSBERG REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 14.00
16353 MATHEW GENZ REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 11.00
16354 BECKY GRANOWSKI REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 10.00
16355 NATHAN HILL REFUND-KIDS KORNER 33.00
16366 CINDY S MILLER REFUND-MEMBERSHIP DUES 1D.50
16357 ATEET PANJ'WANI REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 21.00
16353 ADRIENNE RICE REFUND-RACQUETBALL CLASSES 25.00
16369 CHRIS RINGDAHL REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 14.00
16370 PAM SWANSON REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 20.DD
16371 BEER WHOLESALERS INC BEER 4422.90
16372 CITY CLUB DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 6701.80
16373 COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIXES 399.37
16374 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO • BEER 3274.20
16375 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER 1828.1D
16376 GRIGGS BEER DIST INC BEER 1650.60
16377 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 74.00
16378 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO MIXES 399.15
16379 ROYAL CROWN BEVERAGE CO MIXES 43.55
16330 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO BEER •
7719.57
16331 LANE INSURANCE INC INSURANCE 119671.00
16382 MPLS MEDICAL-RESEARCH FOUNDATION CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 120.00
16383 BROWN & CRIS INC SERVICE-CARMEL ADDITION 131370.53
16384 cEGAN-MCKAY ELECTRICAL CONT INC SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNALS '21D5.4D
163'5 G & L CONTRACTING INC SERVICE-HOMEWARD HILLS READ 2048.00
16 RICHARD KNUTSON INC •
SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW ROAD/PRAIRIE CTR DR 37008.11
16361 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 73246.75
16333 OPUS CORPORATION SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD DRIVE UTILITY 197674.31
16339 PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTORS INC SERVICE-TECHNOLOGY DRIVE & MITCHELL ROAD 20208.35
16390 SHAFER CONTRACTING INC SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 268571.79
16391 SHAFER CONTRACTING INC SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 130472.80
16392 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 524.21
16393 STUART ALEXANDER MILEAGE • 10.25
16394 ALLWEATHER ROOF CO REPAIR CITY HALL RODE 131.25
16395 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO MOPS/DUSTERS-LIQUOR STORE 8.85
16396 MPLS AREA CHAPTER BOOKS-WATER RESCUE & SAFETY-CO8MUNTIY CTR 11.00
16397 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS LAB SUPPLIES-WATER OEPT 55.80
16398 EARL. F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC WARNING & REGULATION SIGNS/STREET SIGNS 3381.30
16399 AQUA CITY IRRIGATION SPRINKLER HEAD-PARK MAINTENANCE 80.40
15430 DALE ARNDT SEPTEMBER 84 CUSTODIAL SERVICE , 200.00
16401 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC BLACKTOP 5987.77
1643? ASTLEFORD INTNL INC FAN/BEARINGS/BRACKETS/SEALS-EQUIP MAINT 269.20
16403 AT & T INiORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 70.89
1 1A AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 872.63.
15435 AVR INC CONCRETE-DRAINAGE 181.26
16405 B R W INC SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 4709.50
15407 DENIS DILLMYER SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 75.00
1 3 LOIS BO'ETTCHER SERVICE-MINUTES FOR PARK & RFC COMMISSION 90.00
164 ANDREA BROSCH RACQUETBALL INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 62.50 {
16 '" na4N PHOTO FILM PROCESSING 71.65
13a610811
16411 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC ROCK 2144.19
1641Z. B'JTCNS BAR SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 692.55
164i33 LEE BRANDT SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 100.00
164`' CARDOX CORP CARBON DIOXIDE-WATER DEPT 1607.20
164. CHANHASSEN BUMPER TO BUMPER -BATTERIES/TIE ROD ENDS/LINKS/FLYWHEEL/ 1754.48
-HOSES/OIL FILTERS/AIR FILTERS/PLUG WIRES/
-BOLTS/EXHAUST/MIRROR/THERMOSTAT/BELT/CHOKE/
BRAKE PARTS
16416 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO LEGAL AD 122.22
16417 CLUTCH & U-JOINT BURNSVILLE INC FRONT DRIVE SHAFT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 125.00
16418 JOYCE CONLEY CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 358.26
16419 CONTINENTAL BANK BOND PAYMENT 361.03
16420 COPY EQUIPMENT INC BLUELINE/SEPIA FILM-ENGINEERING DEPT 97.07
16421 COUNTRY CLUB MARKET INC COFFEE-CITY HALL 90.59
16422 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CO DESK PLATES-CITY HALL 70.B1
16423 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC INC LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT • 211.95
16424 CUSTOM LABORATORIES INC SUPPLIES-ELECTION 53.86
I6425 CUTLER MAGNER CO QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 7201.68
16426 WARD F DAHLBERG SEPTEMBER 84 EXPENSES 80.00
16427 DALCO CLEANING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 70.69
16428 CRAIG W DAWSON MILEAGE 8.00
16429 EUGENE DIETZ SEPTEMBER 84 EXPENSES & CONFERENCE EXP 420.09 -•
16430 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU SUPPLIES-SUNBONNET DAYS 48.24
16431 BRADLEY DRONEN REFUND-VARIANCE FEE 50.00
16432 DURO-TEST CORPORATION LIGHT BULBS-LIQUOR STORE 173.06
16433 EAU CLAIRE COUNTY WITHHOLDING FROM EMPLOYEE. PER COURT ORDER 4.00
16434 JOY EASTMAN MILEAGE 33.14
16435 EDEN PRAIRIE TRANSMISSION TRANSMISSION PARTS-WATER DEPT 43.00
16t EDEN PRAIRIE TRASHTRONICS SEPTEMBER 84 TRASH PICKUP 290.00
1571',, CITY OF EDINA AUGUST TESTS 175.50
15438 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS MANHOLE COVER-STREET DEPT 191.00
16439 ELLIOTT FIM CO INC FILM-COMMUNITY CENTER 60.00
16440 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC BOOTS-WATER DEPT - 42.25 '
16441 ELMARKETING DEMONSTRATOR UNITS-ELECTION 117.00
16442 EXIDE BATTERY SALES 2 BATTERIES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 346.40
16443 FIRST TRUST ST PAUL BOND PAYMENT • 59800.00
16444 FORD TANK & PAINTING CO INC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-WATER DEPT 1250.00
16445 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC BOOK-FORESTRY DEPT 51.93
15446 FRANZ ENGINEERING REPRODUCTIONS I MAPS-ENGINEERING DEPT 161.02
I6447 G & K SERVICES TOWELS/JACKETS 100.35
16448 G L CONTRACTING INC SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW ROAD 4905.57
15149 GARELICK STEEL CO STEEL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 129.50
16450 GLIDDEN PAINT PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE 255.00
16151 B F GOODRICH TIRE CENTER 8 SNOW TIRES/4 TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 635.32
16152 DALE GREEN CO SOD-DRAINAGE 146.75
16153 HACH CO LA8 SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 161.65
1654 FRED HAFFNER REPAIR CLAMP ON BOOMTRUCK-FORESTRY DEPT 120.00 4
16155 IiA''1ERSAW CONSTRUCTION REFUND-BUILDING DEPT 50.00 •
15156 HARMON GLASS 2 WINDSHIELDS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 25D.82
16157 DFBBIE IIEGGE SWIP1 AID-COMMUNITY CENTER 42.00
1c 58 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER LATHS/CARBON DIOXIDE-PARK MAINTENANCE 45.70
l'oW) DIANL HOKANSON EXPENSES 18.26
IHONEYWELL INC JULY•SEPT 84 MAINTENANCE .AGREEMENT-[DATER 3214.00
ll HOPKINS DODGE SALES INC BUSHING KITS/SWAYBAR-BUS1iINGS-EQUIP 1ITUNT 62.08
SS:i!321
•
',. .il
•
1' - ' HOPKINS PARTS CO MIRROR/HEADLIGHTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 28.87
lu. s IMPERIAL INC -STEEL EQUIPMENT RACK/WIRE/BOLTS & NUTS- 171.05
WATER DEPT •
1b-f INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #272 -SERVICE-DAY CAMP/WIND SCREENS FOR TENNIS • 2217.66
COURTS/SEPTEMBER 84 CUSTODIAL SERVICE
16465 INFORMATION PUBLISHERS INC ADS-LIQUOR STORES 499.00
16466 rINGRAM EXCAVATING ' `'''' SERVICE-HORSE ARENA 3734.00
16467 J & R RADIATOR CORP RADIATOR CORE/NEW RADIATOR-EQUIP MAINT 645.69
16468 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 41.16 •
16469 CARL JULLIE EXPENSES 28.00 •
16470 rJUSTUS LUMBER CO > L'•• ' " LUMBER-STARING LAKE PARK 147.98
16471 KATE KARNAS SUPPLIES-PLANNING DEPT • 25.40
16472 KARULF HARDWARE INC -CABLE/VALVES/CONCRETE MIX/D-CON/HAMMER 452.87
-HANDLE/CHISEL/CHAIN/SPRAY PAINT/PLASTIC/
-FURNACE FILTERS/BATTERIES/PAINT BRUSHES/ •
-PAINT THINNER/RAKES/PLUNGER/BOLTS & NUTS/
-CONTACT PAPER/WIRE/SPONGES/SANDPAPER/
VARNISH
16473 TOM KEEFE SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 187.5D
16474;,KRAEMERS HOME CENTER -PEGBOARD/JACK/WRENCH SET/PLIERS/SCREW- 228.85
DRIVERS/PLAN RACKS-WATER DEPT
16475 J KRIS KRYSTOFIAK EXPENSES-SUMMER PROGRAMS 25.25
16476 AL KUKLINSKI FOOTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 200.00 •
16477 ROBERT LAMBERT OCTOBER EXPENSES 165.00
16478 LANCE SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 48.41
16479 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD AUGUST 84 LEGAL SERVICE 13883.49
16480 LEEF BROS INC RUG SERVICE/COVERALLS , 446.45
181 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR EQUIPMENT PARTS-PARK MAINTENANCE 42.76
LYt1AN LUMBER CO LUMBER-PARK MAINTENANCE 29.56
83 MAHIN WAL"/_ INCORPORATED KEYLOCK-COMMUNITY CENTER 11.50
16484 RANDY MASON HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 135.00
16485 BARBARA t1ATTSON INSTRUCTOR-SWIMMING CLASSES/FEES PAID 68.25
16486 MCFARLANES INC CONCRETE-STREET DEPT & PARK MAINTENANCE 58.50
16487 MENARD INC REFUND-BUILDING PERMIT 329.90
16488 MERIT/JULIAN GRAPHICS FORMS-BUILDING DEPT 288.59
16489 METRO FONE COMM INC OCTOBER 84 PAGER RENTAL 77.72
16490 METROPOLITAN AREA MANAGEMENT ASSN CONFERENCE-MANAGER 8.00
16491 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM NDVEMBER SEWER SERVICE CHARGES 58910.7/
16492 MIDLAND EQUIPMENT CO SPILLPANS FOR DUMP TRUCKS-EQUIPMENT MAINT 699.00
16493 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION LAND-EDENVALE BLVD 13229.00
16494 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP 3446.99 1.
16495 CI1itIS MILLER INSTRUCTOR-SWIMMING CLASSES/FEES PAID 68.25
16496 MILLER/DAV1S CO FORMS-ASSESSING DEPT 20.00
16497 MINNESOTA OAR SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES-LIQUIOR STORES 33.00
16493 MINNESOTA GAS CO SERVICE 2901.50
1ti199 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER 84.5t) •
1650 MODERN TIRE CO WUEEL ALIGNMENTS 105.80
11061 MIT DISTRIBUTING CO ARM SWITCH COLLAR-PARK MAINTENANCE 20.20
if60 BI:RNARO ,1 t1IILCAHY CO INC COUPLER-COMMUNITY CENTER 7.09
1n60.; NATIONAL ARB0 DAY FOUNDATION DUES 10.0a ::
1 I t) UI:•T SIGN; CO INC REFUND-S1GN PERMIT 18.00
1 O,:, N) 11"E RN STAIFS POOR CO SERVICE •
8619.5?
4 i ..}Rwr..s r BANK MI „i'APOt IS ttA BON) PAYMENTS 794267.35
11- NJi;Tldt;'LSTERI BLLI. TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 3055.96
90974.334
1' NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 650.20
F.- ' , NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 379.93
It': STEVE OLSTAD MILEAGE 3.98
11i HARRY A ORTLOFF HOCKEY & SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 145.00
16$, MARK PANNKUK MILEAGE 41.25
1 .'r.3 RITA PAPPAS EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER 28.61
.G14 CLIFFORD PATTERSON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 12.50
16515 W G PEARSON INC ROCK 29.04
16516 PATRICK PEREZ SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAIO 25.00
16517 WILLIE PEREZ SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 50.00
16518 CONNIE PETERS MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 9.25
16519 PITNEY BOWES -REPAIR POSTAGE MACHINE-CITY HALL/EQUIP 356.25
-RENTAL-COMMUNITY CENTER/MAINTENANCE
AGREEMENT-CITY HALL
16520 PLAQUES PLUS INC PLAQUES-COMMUNITY SERVICES 51.10
16521 POMMER t4FG CO INC SOFTBALL & TENNIS TROPHIES/FEES PAID 317.00
16522 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC REPAIR BALLAST-COMMUNITY CENTER 152.75
16523 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN TRAILER-WATER DEPT 783.19
16524 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC TRANSCRIBER-PLANNING DEPT 329.DD
16525 PRIOR LAKE AGGRETATE INC SAND=STRINGLAKE PARK 1959.48
16526 JAMES PUFAHL SDFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 62.50
16527 PUMP & METER SERVICE INC REPAIR PUMP HOSE 73.00
1652B R & R SPECIALTIES INC SHARPEN ZAMBONI BLADES-COMMUNITY CENTER 66.50
16529 RICK RABENORT EXPENSES 72.31
16530 RAPIT PRINTING FORMS-ENGINEERING DEPT 101.00
16531 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 1104.99
16532 KAREN RINTA VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 40.00
16533 RYANS RUBBER STAMPS STAMPS-LIQUOR STORE & CITY HALL 40.00
1 "1 ST REGIS CORP STEEL-DRAINAGE DEPT/LUMBER-STARING LAKE 681.84
1i . WAYNE R SANDERS EXPENSES 814.26
16536 SAVOIE SUPPLY COMPANY INC CAR WASH-STREET DEPT 174.00
16537 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO -OVERALLS-STREET DEPT/ROPE/TENNIS BALLS- 106.89
SUMMER PROGRAMS
16538 SHAKOPEE FORD INC -MUFFLER ASSY/LAMP/EXHAUST RAIN CAP/REPAIR 978.78
TRANSMISSION/REPAIR STARTER
16539 4W GORDON SMITH CD -BATTERIES/TIE ROD ENDS/BELTS/MUFFLER/ 10300.76
-SWITCH/TRANSMISSION FLUID/ANTIFREEZE/TAIL
LIGHTS/REGULAR GAS $3147.00/DIESEL $6386.40
16540 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP WRENCHES-WATER DEPT 96.57
16541 SOUTIir,EST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC EMPLOYMENT ADS-COi1?1UNITY CENTER 90.00
16542 SPS COMPANIES INC VALVE-SEWER DEPT 17.29
16543 STS CONSULTANTS LTD SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW ROAD 308.40
16544 SULL1VANS SERVICES INC SERVICE-RESEARCH ROAD 50.00
16545 TRACY OIL CO INC UNLEADED GAS 8400.00
li:616 TWIN CITY TESTING INC TEST WATER TREATMENT SLUDGE-WATER DEPT 130.00
11617 UNITED LABORATORIES INC CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT 430.3?
1(A3 U S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BOOK-COMMUNITY CENTER 4.55
IG`,49 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE INC GAS CYLINDERS-COMMNITY CENTER 227.62
11) VAN WATERS ROOERS CHLORINE:/SLLOCOFIUORIDE-WATER DEPT 2153.9Ei
,5(l VIKING LABORATORIES INC BICARBONATE OF SODA-CO:. UNITY CENTER • 562.90
Its 5? HAVE VITTERA SOFTBALL R FOOTi;ra OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 150.00
16553 VOSS EL.L.CTRIC SUPPLY CO LIGHT BULBS-STREET DEPT 169.20
1f1.64 BILL WAL.SH SERVICE-POLICE DEPT •
170.00
I,4 JIM t:ALTER PAPERS XEROX PAPER-CITY HALL 659.05
33E.G021
lE h WATER PRODUCTS CO COUPLINGS-PARK MAINTENANCE 6.OD
€ 7 WATER PRODUCTS CO -COVER/GASKET/CURB STOP/SIX 1" METERS 21767.34
-$726.00/TEN 1 1/2" METERS $2900.00/THREE
-2" METERS $1245.00/252 5/8" METERS & HORNS
1 _ WEED KING WEEDBCUTTING HYDRANT $424.OD
5 . 1055.00
5:^59 RAY N WELTER HEATING REFUND-BUILDING PERMIT 59.50
6560 WEST PRAIRIE NURSERY CO TREES-FORESTRY DEPT 718.00
16561 WEST WELD SAWBLADES-PARK MAINTENANCE 71.84
16552 XEROX CORP SERVICE 323.11
16563 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 1ST AID SUPPLIES-PUBLIC WORKS DEPT 12.60
16564 ZIEGLER INC WASHERS/PLUG-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 14.22
16565 ZIEGLER TIRE SERVICE CO 4 TIRES-STREET DEPT 552.51
15032 VOID OUT CHECK 119.18-
15430 VOID OUT CHECK • 57.20- 3
2440374
$2257351.06
4
•
ber 16, 1984
CASH DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND NUMBER
10 GENERAL 336521.74
12 CERTIFICATE DEBT FUND 361.03
15 L/S PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL 37739.03
17 L/S PRESERVE 26878.70
31 PARK ACQUIST d DEVELOP 9677.93
33 UTILITY BOND FUND 2048.00
45 UTILITY DEBT FUND ARB 161992.75
47 80 G 0 DEBT FUND 137357.60
51 1MPROV CONST FUND 345176.46
55 IMPROV DEBT FUND ARB 288524.00
56 ROAD IMPROVE DEBT FUND 266213. 00
57 ROAD IMPROV CONST FD 20208.35
73 WATER FUND 46478.09
77 SEWER FUND 59078.82
81 TRUST 6. ESCROW FUND 1055. 00
92 TAX INCREMENT CONST FUND 518040.56
257351.06 •
•
•
•
•
•
MEMORANOUM •
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Chris Enger, Oirector of Planning •
TROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager •
DATE: October 12, 1984
•
SUBJECT: Muirfield Request for Grading Permit
•
At the October 2, 1984, City Council meeting Tandem Corporation requested permission •
to, start grading on the site prior to final preparation of the Developer's Agreement
and second reading. The City Council requested that the Staff return for the
October 16, 1984, meeting with a recommendation on early grading.
The proponent appeared at the Watershed District meeting of October 3, 1984, and
obtained approval of their grading and erosion control plan. City Staff met with •
the proponent on Thursday, October 4, 1984, and reviewed the reduction of lots and
other revisions requested by the City Council.
Because of the large number of projects the City has processed this year and •
projects waiting for preparation of Developer's Agreements and Summary Resolutions,
we are not able to draft the Developer's Agreement to be reviewed by all Staff
members and the proponent's legal counsel and return with signatures within a two-
week period.
•
Since the proponent has agreed to revisions as suggested by the City Council and
since this will not affect the grading plan the Watershed District has reviewed, and r:
due to the length of the process encountered by this project for the Comprehensive
Guide Plan Change, rr' would recommend that Staff he authorized to issue a grading
permit according to City Ordinance and subject to changes as determined necessary by
City Er ,ginecr, prior to the second r.. di ng of :Muirfield.
TO: Mayor & Council
FROM: John Frane
DATE: October 11, 1984
RE: MIDB Guidelines
The Development Commission did not have a quorum at its October 5th meeting.
The following items were discussed.
1. Estimated payroll per new employee
2. The ratio of cost to the number of jobs
3. If the project is zoned correctly for the intended use
4. It would be desirable to limit the bonding to 1,000,000 per applicant,
however, this may not be practical
5. It would be desirable to limit bonds to businesses with fewer than
200 employees
6. The financial strength of the borrower and/or if the loan is secured
7. Projects should close before July 15, 1985 in order that projects not
under the City's cap can apply to the state pool
8. Retail is not a good use of our "cap"
I suggest we send out letters to people recently involved in zonings in-
t forming them that in order to be considered in the "first round" of
1 applications for the City's cap they have to apply to us soon enough for
a hearing on January 15, 1985. It is important that projects close in
time for others to apply to the state pool.
I suggest the Council consider the following as criteria for eliminating
applicants in the first round. We would go down the list until the number
of dollars is less than or equal to our cap.
1. not zoned properly
2. no closing by July 15th
3. retail use
4. spec building (40% or more leased to others)
5. public sale (no 3rd party security)
6. large requests
7. not located in i:he City
8. ratio of jobs to bonds issued
9. cut cards
•
j
, October 16, 1984
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
•
RESOLUTION NO. 84-283
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following
improvements:
I.C. 52-068, Lime Sludge Hauling •
1
bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received
are shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends award of contract to
Stanley E. Pond
as the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council
('- as follows:
The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed
to enter into a contract with Stanley_E. Pond
in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of
52,900 in accordance with the plans and
specifications thereof approved by the Council and on file
in the office of the City Engineer.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on October 16, 1984.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor --
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. frnrr+e, City Clerk
„mot? i
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rodney W. Rue, Design Engineer f(,c")
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
DATE: October 12, 1984
SUBJECT: Summary of Bids for Improvement Contract 52-068
Sealed bids were received at 10:00 A.M. on Thursday, October 11, 1984, for
the above referenced improvement. Three bids were received and tabulated as
follows:
BIDDER BID SECURITY TOTAL BID AMOUNT
•
Stanley E. Pond 5% $52,000
Max.Johnson Trucking 5% $64,000
W.G. Rehbein 5% $84,000
Engineer estimate $60,000
The low bid is approximately 13% below our estimate. _•
Recommend award of contract 52-068 to Stanley E. Pond in the amount of $52,000.
RWR:sg
•