The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council - 10/02/1984EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TUESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1984 COUNCIL MEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: INVOCATION: Councilman Paul Redpath PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL 7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Paul Redpath and George Tangen City Manager Carl J. Jullie; Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson; City Attorney Roger Pauly; Finance Director John Frane; Planning Director Chris Enger; Director of Community Services Robert Lambert; Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS CONSENT CALENDAR A. Resolution No. 84-268, approving Election Judges for General !11E1 ion B. Final Plat approval for Edenvale 18th Addition (Resolution No. 84- 259) C. Final Plat approval for Edenvale 19th Addition (Resolution No. 84- 260) D. Final Plat approval for Edenvale 9th Addition (Resolution No. 84- 261) E. Final Plat approval for Portnoy's 3rd Addition (Resolution No. 84- F. Final Plat approval for Golden Strip East 2nd (Resolution No. 84- 24] G. Set Public Hearing for November 6, 19R4 to consider vacation of excess right-of-way adjacent to Edenvale 9th Addition H. Award contract for Norseman's 6th Addition, Golden Triangle Drive and 74th Street, I.C. 52-065 (TEOlution No. 84-265) I. 1st Reading. of Ordinance No. 115-84. amending CitL Code Sec. 2.05 relating to salaries of Mayor and Councii—Fembers J. Dellwood Special Assessment release (Resolution No. 84-266) Page 2149 Page 2152 Page 2154 Page 2157 Page 2160 Page 2163 Page 2166 Page 2169 Page 2170 !,ty Council Agenda - 2 - Tues., October 2, 1984 K. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 114-84, City Code Amendment to Page 2172 Section 11.70 to regulate signs at the Flying Cloud Airport L. VALLEY LAKE BUSINESS CENTER by GSB Investments. 2nd Reading of Page 2175 Ordinance NT.1 -03-84, Rezoning from Rural to 1-2, Approval of Developer's Agreement for Valley Lake Business Center; and Adoption of Resolution No. 84-256, Approving Summary of Ordinance No. 103-84 and Ordering Publication of said Summary for Valley Lake Business Center. 10.63 acres into one lot and one outlot. Location: West of Prairie Center Drive, south of Valley View Road, along the northwest shore of Smetana Lake. M. VALLEY VIEW PLAZA by Frantz Klodt. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 109-84, Rezoning from C-Regional to Office and Approval of Resolution No. 84-257, Approving Development Plan for Valley View Plaza. 5.22 acres into one lot and one outlot. Location: North of Valley View Road at Office Ridge Circle. Page 2182 N. Clerk's License List Page 2186 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. MUIRFIELD by Tandem Corporation. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment Page 1628 & from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential for 2187 approximately 25 acres; Planned Unit Development District Review, with variances, and Zoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for approximately 11.0 acres and from Rural to R1-9.5 for approximately 25 acres; Preliminary Plat of 36 acres into 119 single family lots. Location: North side of Valley View Road, west of Park View Lane. (Resolution No. 84-269 - Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; Ordinance No. 116-84 - Rezoning; and Resolution No. 84-270 - Preliminary Plat) Continued Public Hearing from August 28, 1984 B. BLUFFS WEST 5TH ADDITION by The Bluffs Company. Request for Page 1952 & Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 for 14.5 acres 2196 and Preliminary Plat of 14.5 acres into 32 single family lots. Location: South of Riverview Road, east of West Riverview Drive. (Ordinance No. 106-84 - Zoning; and Resolution No. 84-215 - Preliminary Plat) Continued Public Hearing from September 4, 1984. C. EDENVALE II by Richard Anderson, Inc. Request for Preliminary Page 2197 Plat of 4.57 acres for one lot and approval of Permit to construct within the floodplain. Location: Southeast quadrant of Mitchell Road and Valley View Road. (Resolution No. 84-258 - Preliminary Plat; and Resolution No. 84-271 - Floodplain Permit) D. REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL Page 2206 DEVELOPMENT BONDS IN THE AMOUNT OF-S-3,000,000.00 FOR VALLEY VIEW ASSOCIATES (Resolution No. 84-272T — IV. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 16033 - 16310 Page 2219 V. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution No. 84.7267, granting_preliminary approval of Municipal Page 2226 Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $400,000.00 for McGlynn Bakeries City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,October 2, 1984 Page 2237 B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 117-84, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5, and adoption of Resolution No. 84-211, approving Development Plan for Puffs West 4th Addition. 6 lots on 2 acres. Location: Northeast quadrant of Riverview Road and Homeward Hills Road. VI. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Review of decision of Board of Appeals & Adjustments regarding Variance No. 84-45 for Hans Hagen Homes VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members B. Report of City Manager 1. Review of proposed 1985 City Budget (Continued from September 25, 1984) 2. Discussion on Recycling Program 3. Set Joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting date 4. November 6 Council meeting date C. Report of City Attorney MIL NEW BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT. Page 2240 Page 2247 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-268 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, that the following persons have agreed to serve as election judges and are appointed for the General Election to be held on November 6, 1984. *Indicated head judge for that precinct. KING OF GLORY LUTHERAN CHURCH PRECINCT 1 *Cheryl Glisczinski Jo Ann Wronksi Dorothy Fitzgerald Sue Keller Nancy Downey Idwal "Tommy" Thomas Mavonne Treptow Nancy Schwartz Linda Campbell Judy Lehman PRECINCT 2 *Allene Hookom Delores Klein Roberta Bronson Helen Haupt Dawn Busch Bernie Ploumen Ann Hawkins Pat Nash Judy Kober PRECINCT 3 *Sue Lane Mary Upton Bill Jellison Joan Barth Joyce Myhre Larrie Hill Vi Johnson Bill McNeil PRECINCT 4 *Doris Johnson Priscilla Bailey Cheryl Bridge Nikki Anderson Jan Anderson Gladys Grannes Elaine Udstuen Ruth Mital Cecil Wyman 7152 Ticonderoga Trail 6630 Tartan Curve 7247 Green Ridge Drive 6721 Lochanburn Road 6970 Ticonderoga Trail 17440 Duck Lake Trail 18865 Deerfield Trail 17409 Duck Lake Trail 18810 Harrogate Drive 6881 Ticonderoga Trail 16716 Prairie Lane 15701 N. Lund Road 6236 Eden Prairie Road 15709 S. Lund Road 7455 Hames Way 17040 S. Shore Lane 18099 S. Shore Lane 18811 Maple Leaf Drive 16921 S. Shore Lane 6961 Alpine Trail 16163 Edenwood Drive 9560 Highview Drive 16481 Hilltop Road 15011 Summerhill Drive 7942 Timber Trail 16176 Fdenwood Drive 7341 Franklin Circle CROSSTOWN BAPTIST CHURCH 14315 Crown Drive 6950 Mariann Drive 7272 Gerard Drive 6581 Manchester Lane 6591 Manchester Lane 6990 Mariann Drive 12774 Gordon Drive 12762 Gotdon Drive 6560 Leesborough Avenue 934-2195 934-4226 937-9742 934-9482 934-9565 934-9205 934-9037 934-5686 934-8126 934-9479 934-2550 934-9124 934-9070 934-9127 937-2435 934-2391 934-2253 934-2646 934-1956 937-1669 937-2738 934-0934 937-1929 937-2815 934-8663 937-2848 937-2547 937-2287 937-8885 941-8104 937-1273 937-1271 937-8913 941-3654 944-3481 937-1637 EDEN PRAIRIE ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CHURCH Res. No. 84-268 page two PRECINCT 5 IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH *Shirley Jellison Evelyn Rogers Bernice Holasek Marie Wittenberg Caroline Nelson Aurelia Rasinski Marie Woodhouse Peg Meehan Patty Jones Chris Dodge PRECINCT 6 *Jinny Gibson Virginia Gartner Mary Helfand Dorothy Schwartz Betty Fritz Judy Miller Thelma Fricke Alfred Nelson PRECINCT 7A *Adeline Bramwell Rita Anderson Louise Doughty Ruth Traaseth Thomas Zalusky Jan Olson Harlan Fritz Margaret Kruger PRECINCT 7B *Linda iran Alice Smith Grace Carmody Marilyn Lundeen Ruth Olson Elaine Jacques Viola McLain Mary Mullen Josephine Zalusky Rose Ripka 9560 Highview Drive 9100 Eden Prairie Road 10020 Dell Road 9880 Crestwood Terrace 16300 Hilltop Road 7682 Superior Terrace 9520 Lakeland Circle 16698 Terrey Pine Drive 9250 Eden Prairie Road 15850 Westgate Drive 15737 Cedar Ridge Road 15701 Cedar Ridge Road 15476 Village Woods Drive 15051 Scenic Heights Road 8226 Tamarack Trail 7835 Eden Court 15610 Corral Lane 16300 Hilltop Road NEW TESTAMENT CHURCH 14329 Fairway Drive 14312 Fairway Drive 13200 Roberts Drive 14999 Scenic Heights Road 635 Prairie Center Drive 9360 Cedar Forest Road 8226 Tamarack Trail 14311 Fairway Drive 8936 Darnel Road 8355 Mitchell Road 8595 Mitchell Road 8381 Mitchell Road 9051 E. Staring Lane 9021 Riley lake Road 14224 Chestnut Drive 8958 Darnel Road 635 Prairie Center Drive 12405 Cockspur Court 934-0934 937-2992 934-1185 934-0961 937-8941 937-8699 934-1424 934-8847 937-2347 937-8413 937-1374 937-1595 934-6704 937-2289 937-2480 937-8653 937-2431 937-8941 937-8987 937-8196 941-2337 937-1006 941-9215 937-1949 937-2480 937-8261 941-4129 934-3711 937-2651 . 937-9045 937-1767 934-0944 937-1798 941-6618 941-9215 944-2446 EDEN PRAIRIE METHODIST CHURCH SO SUBURBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY VO-TECH IC() Res. No. 84-268 page three PRECINCT 8 EDEN PRAIRIE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH *Barb Vanderploeg Marion Nesbitt Sharon Buntin Nancy Little Barbara Cail Barbara Bergen Patricia Berlinger Leone Berta Mildred Clark Elaine Wedel PRECINCT 9A *George-Ann Lillie Cheryl Hansen Jim Rannow Darlene Wegner Sharon Nolte Betty Schaitberger Lyle Johnston Jean Reichow Yvonne Bushnell Leila Seifert PRECINCT 9B Jeanne Brandt Elanor Levine Carol Hegge Carol Burnett Joy Brekke Laurina Reiff Pauline Johnston Jean Jones Isabell Iverson Ann Cheatham COUNTING CENTER Perry Forster Walter Thompson Leo Rasinski 8735 Leeward Circle 8701 Black Maple Drive 9762 Linden Drive 9450 Aspen Circle 9205 Talus Circle 8705 Bentwood Drive 9744 Mill Creek Drive 10065 Pioneer Trail 8779 Basswood Road 8973 Darnel Road 17120 Cedarcrest Drive 9445 Aspen Circle 16316 Lincoln Lane 10220 Amsden Way 17131 Cedarcrest Drive 12880 Pioneer Trail 8621 Basswood Road #18 10501 Pioneer Trail 16740 S. Shore Lane 14282 Golfview Drive 12300 Riverview Road 9712 Mill Creek Drive 10015 Pioneer Trail 9940 Bennett Place 10091 Homeward Hills Road 7024 Baker Road 8621 Basswood Road #18 9416 Clubhouse Road 12135 Oxbow Drive 9236 Amsden Way EDEN PRAIRIE CITY HALL 9505 Highview Drive 11325 Westwind Drive #1. 7682 Superior Terrace 941-5363 941-2387 941-9039 944-2437 941-5140 941-8315 944-2203 944-1551 941-3269 944-7509 937-1027 941-8690 937-8237 941-7718 937-8348 941-1451 944-9308 941-4054 937-9433 934-7362 941-3316 944-7636 941-2707 941-5654 941-4547 937-8820 944-9308 944-6720 941-7465 941-8592 934-0938 941-7549 937-8699 PAX CHRISTI COMMUNITY CHURCH PAX CHRISTI COMMUNITY CHURCH ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on this 2nd day of October, 1984. ATTEST; Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor n V.Ann rity riPrk October 2, 1984 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 84-259 RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF EDENVALE 18th ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Edenvale 18th Addition . .has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder; and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for Edenvale 18th Addition Is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated 9/24/84. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are herety authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on October 2, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: Davi'd L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician c -OlVet2 DATE: September 24, 1984 SUBJECT: EDENVALE 18th ADDITION PROPOSAL: The developer, Equitable Life Assurance Society, has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Edenvale 18th Addition located in the southwest quadrant of Edenvale Boulevard and Birch Island Road, in the South 1/2 of Section 4. The site is a replat of Outlot A, Edenvale 8th Addition, containing approximately 3.2 acres to be divided into 10 single family lots. HISTORY: The Preliminary Plat was approved by the City Council on June 5, 1984, per Resolution 84-130. Zoning to RI-9.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on July 10, 1984, per Ordinance 40-84. Resolution 84-157, setting specific conditions of Council approval, was adopted by the City Council on July 10, 1984. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal utilities will be installed throughout the development by the developer in conformance with City standards. PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication shall conform to the requirements of the City Code. BONDING: The requirements for bonding are covered in the City Code. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Edenvale 18th Addition subject to the requirements of this report, Resolution 84-157 and the following: 1. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $300.00. 2. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $420.00. 3. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $2,340.00. 4. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. DLO:sg cc: John Lassen, Equitable Life Assurance Society Q 11;" October 2, 1984 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE VENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 84-260 RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF EDENVALE 19th ADDITON WHEREAS, the plat of Edenvale 19th Addition submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder; and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for Edenvale 19th Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated 9/25/84. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on October 2, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician DATE: September 25, 1984 SUBJECT: EDENVALE 19th ADDITION giv PROPOSAL: The developer, Equitable Life Assurance Society, has requested C i t y Council approval of the final plat of Edenvale 19th. The site contains approximately 9.2 acres to be divided into 17 single f a m i l y lots. This is a replat of part of Outlot W, Edenvale Third Addi t i o n , and is located east of Edenvale Boulevard and north of Woodland Drive in the South of Section 4. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on June 5, 1 9 8 4 , per Resolution 84-131. Zoning to RI-9.5 was finally read and approved by the City Counci l on July 17, 1984, per Ordinance 41-84. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was exec u t e d on July 17, 1984. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appe a l s . UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal utilities and streets will be installed by the Develop e r in conformance with City Standards. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Develope r ' s Agreement and must also conform to the City Code. A preservation easement over the southerly 30 feet of Lots 8 through 11, Block I has been required through the Developer's Ag r e e - ment. This easement should be shown on the final plat as a drai n a g e and utility easement with a separate recordable document coverin g the preservation requirement to be submitted to the Engineering Departnent prior to release of the final plat. BONDING: The requirements for bonding are covered in the Developer's Agr e e m e n t . RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Edenvale 19th Addition su b j e c t to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: Pg. 2, Final Plat Edenvale 19th Addition 1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $390.00. 2.1 Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $2808.00. 3. Receipt of Engineering fee in the amount of $510.00. 4. Receipt of recordable preservation easement document. DLO:sg cc: John Lassen, Equitable Life Assurance Society 2156 October 2, 1984 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 84-261 RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF EDENVALE 9th ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Edenvale 9th Addition submitted in the manner for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder; and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for Edenvale 9th Addition Is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated 9/25/84. B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20, Subd. 2.A., waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said Engineer's report. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on October 2, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 1;1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician September 25, 1984 EDENVALE 9th ADDITION PROPOSAL: The developer, Equitable Life Assurance Society, has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Edenvale 9th Addition, an Office and Industrial division consisting of approximately 100 acres. This is a replat of RLS 1354 and part of Edenvale 4th Addition located south of Valley View Road in the South h of Section 10. HISTORY: The Preliminary Plat was approved by the City Council on October 5, 1982, per Resolution 82-235. The Planned Unit Development was approved by the City Council on October 5, 1982, per Resolution 82-235. Prior to issuance of building permits upon any lot, rezoning procedures consistant with the City Code must be followed. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed on June 11, 1984. VARIANCES: A variance from City Code 12.20, Subd. 2.A, waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be necessary. All other variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal utilities, streets and walkways will be installed by the developer in conformance with City standards. Vacation of part of Valley View Road (located in the north central portion of the plat) will be necessary prior to recording this plat. Normal vacation proceedures to enable the roadway vacation will be followed. Pg. 2, Final Plat Edenvale 9th Addition 9/25/84 PARK DEDICATION: • The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. A recordable document covering the preservation easement requirement described in the Developer's Agreement, must be submitted to the Engineering Department prior to release of the final plat. BONDING: The requirements for bonding are covered in the Developer's Agreement. FEES: Engineering fees will be due when the Outlots are further subdivided. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Edenvale 9th Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: I. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $810.00. 2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $9,360.00. 3. Receipt of recordable preservative easement. 4. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. 5. Satisfactory completion of the vacation proceedings for excess right-of-way adjacent to Valley View Road and completion of property transfers. DLO:sg cc: John Lassen, Equitable Life Assurance Society z59 October 2, 1984 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 84-262 RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF PORTNOY'S 3RD ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Portnoy's Addition .has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder; and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for Portnoy's 3rd Addition Is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated 9/24/84. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on October 2, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor AITEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 2 160 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT Mayor Penzel and City Council Members 1HOUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician DATE: September 24, 1984 SUBJECT: PORTNOY'S 3RD ADDITION (a.k.a. Valley Lake Business Center) PROPOSAL: ,750& The developer, Gerald A. Portnoy has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Portnoy's 3rd Addition, located west of Prairie Center Drive, and south of Valley View Road in the South '1 of Section 12. The plat contains approximately 10.6 acres, with 4.4 acres of the site (Lot 1, Block 1) intended for the construction of a 50,000 sq. ft. office/industrial building. Outlot A contains a portion of Lake Smetana and adjacent shoreland with ownership intended to be maintained by the developer. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on September 4, 1984, per Resolution 84-236. Ordinance 103-84, zoning the site to 1-2, is scheduled for final approval by the City Council on October 2, 1984. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report is scheduled for City Council execution on October 2, 1984. VARIANCES: All variance requests, not allowed through the Developer's Agreement, must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal sanitary sewer will be installed by the developer, in conformance with City Standards, to serve this site. Water main necessary to serve the site is being installed under a City contract. The developer must provide and maintain access to the property located easterly of this site. An access easement agreement between property owners should be developed to cover this requirement and submitted in a recordable form for review by the City Engineer prior to release of the final plat. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. • Pg. 2, Final Plat Portnoy's 2nd Addition 9/24/84 )NDING: The requirements for bonding are covered in the Developer's Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Portnoy's 3rd Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: 1. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $100.00. 2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $468.00. 3. Execution of the Developer's Agreement. 4. Second reading of Ordinance 103-84. 5. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. 6. Receipt of copy of cross access agreement. 7. Recordable document for walkway easement as described In the Developer's Agreement. 8. An access easement to Kostecka property. 9. 100% petition for Valley View Road water main improvements. DLO:sg cc: Gerald Portnoy Ron Krueger 210- October 2, 1984 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 84-264 RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF GOLDEN STRIP EAST WHEREAS, the plat of Golden Strip East . .has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder; and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for Golden Strip East Is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated 9/26/84. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to. execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on October 2, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 216,3 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT 10: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician DATE: September 20, 1984 cedo SUBJECT: GOLDEN STRIP EAST (a.k.a. Southwest Crossing II) PROPOSAL: The developers, Condon Naelele, Inc. and Vantage Properties, Inc., have requested City Council approval of the final plat of Golden Strip East. The proposed plat contains approximately 55 acres located west of CNR Golden Strip (Viking Site), north of 1-494 and south of Nine Mile Creek in the North la of Section 13. The proposal will divide the property into 3 lots, 3 outlots and right-of-way dedication for Golden Triangle Drive and Viking Drive. Outlot A includes flood plain and low land along Nine Mile Creek and is intended for dedication to the City. Outlot B is to be replatted at a later date. Outlot C is intended to provide access to Outlot B and may later be proposed for dedication to the City as right-of-way for a future street. HISTORY: PUD concept approval for Golden Strip East was granted by the City Council on January 5, 1982, per Resolution 82-10. A preliminary plat for the Golden Strip East was approved by the City Council on January 5, 1982, per Resolution 82-11. The final plat for Golden Strip East received Council approval on August 17, 1982, per Resolution 82-204. This plat has not been released by the City or recorded at Hennepin County. A Developer's Agreement covering the original plat was executed on August 17, 1984. An amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan for Southwest Crossing II was approved by the City Council on May 15, 1984, per Resolution 84-104. An amendment to the Golden Strip East PUD Concept was approved by the City Council on May 15, 1984, per Resolution 84-105. The preliminary plat for Southwest Crossing II, covering 3 lots and 3 outlots on 56.25 acres, was approved by the City Council on September 18, 1984, per Resolution 84-243. 2_16q Pg. 3, Final Plat Golden Strip East 9/27/84 RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Golden Strip East subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: 1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $165.00. 2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $6,048.00. 3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $420.00. 4. Satisfaction of park dedication requirements. 5. Satisfaction of bonding requirements and/or petition for streets and utilities. 6. Extension of Golden Triangle Road to the north line of Outlot A. 7. Right-of-way for Viking Drive. DLO:sg cc: Don Brauer, Condon Naegele, Inc. • Matt Nicoll, Vantage Companies Dale Beckman, BRW, Inc. LT111 rieke carrell r 'ler k dates, inc. aichitebts engineers land surveyors §.eptember 21, 1984 Mr 4 Eugene A. Dietz, P.E. City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: Norseman Industrial Park 6th Addition Improvements 1.C. 52-065 RCM Project No. 841019 Dear Mr. Dietz: Bids were opened on September 20, 1984 at 10:30 A.M. for the above- referenced project. The low bid for the project was submitted by Northdale Construction Company in the amount of $381,033.30. This is approximately 6.6% greater than the construction cost estimate shown in the feasibility report ($357,500). A summary of the four bids received is attached. Also attached is a Resolution Accepting Bid for your use. The low bidder is a reputable contractor. We therefore recommend awarding the contract to Northdale Construction Company. V y, truly yours, 11, 4 .? I • `, 1 , Peter J. Knaeble, P.E. RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATES, INC. PJK:jj Attachment 1011 first street south post ofirce box 130 hopkins. mrnnesota 5b343 612-935-6901 2/66 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. • 84-225 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following improvements: • I.C. 52-065 Norseman Industrial Park 6th Addition (RCN #841019) bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received are shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends award of contract to Northdale Construction Company, Inc. as the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Northdale Construction Company, Inc. in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of $381,033.30 in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on October 2, 1984 Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL: John D. Franc, Clerk 216q 1)..... ,,; ,,,-- )/ - 01. LJ Consulting Engineer Peter J. KnaPble, P.E. Rieke Carroll Muller Assoc., Inc. SUMMARY OF BIDS LC. 52-065 DESCRIPTION: Norseman Industrial Park 6th Addition RCM 0841019 BIDS OPENED: September 20, 1984 10:30 A.M. CONSULTING ENGINEER: Rieke Carroll Muller Associates, Inc. CHECKED BY: Rieke Carroll Muller Associates, Inc. BIDDER Northdale Construction Co., Inc. F.F. Jedlicki, Inc. Ceca Utilities, Inc. G.L. Contracting BID SECURITY Yes, 5% Yes, 5% Yes, 5% Yes, 5% TOTAL AMOUNT $381,033.30 $409,528.50 $423,482.70 $473,989.45 The undersigned recommend award of Contract to: Northdale Construction Co., Inc. as the lowest responsible bidder for this Improvement Contract. • Eugene A. Dietz, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 115-84 An ordinance amending City Code Sec 2.05 relating to the salaries of Mayor and Council members. The City Council of the City of Eden Prairie ordains: That Subdivision 1 is amended to read: The monthly salary of the Mayor shall be $400.00 That Subdivision 2 is amended to read: The monthly salary of each Council member shall be $300.00 The effective date of this ordinance is January 1, 1985. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of 19 , and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of ,19 Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Franc, City Clerk SEAL 21 October 2, 1984 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 84-266 RELEASE FROM AGREEMENT REGARDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, on August 16, 1983, the City of Eden Prairie, Dellwood Associates, a Minnesota general partnership consisting of Tandem Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, and TCF Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, entered into a certain Agreement Regarding Special Assessments pertaining to the property described on Exhibit "A" hereto. WHEREAS, the hearing on the assessments referred to in that agree- ment has been held and the assessments have been levied. WHEREAS, the time to appeal from the assessments pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081 has expired. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Eden Prairie hereby releases the property described on Exhibit "A" hereto from all claims and liens of and under that certain Agreement Regarding Special Assessments dated August 16, 1983, executed by City of Eden Prairie, and Dellwood Associates by Tandem Corporation and TCF Development Corporation, filed or recorded in the Office of the Registrar of Titles on September 8, 1983, as Docuement No. 1535859. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a document releasing the property as described above. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on October 2, 1984. ilElfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL: John D. Frane, Clerk 21-70 EXHIBIT "A" LRts 1 through and including 18, Block 1, Dellwood; Lots 1 through and including 52, Block 2, Dellwood; Lots 1 through and including 20, Block 3, Dellwood; Outlots A, B, and C, Dellwood according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. ORDINANCE NO. 114-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 11.70, SUBD. 2, SUBPARAGRAPH 19, ENTITLED "ROOF SIGN;" AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 11.70, SUBD. 2, SUB- PARAGRAPH 27, ENTITLED "WALL AREA;" ADDING CITY CODE SECTION 11.70, SUBD. 4, SUBDIVISION J, REGULATING AIRPORT DISTRICT SIGNS; AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SEC- TION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Section 11.70, Subd. 2, Subparagraph 19, shall be and is amended to read as follows: 19. "Roof Sign" - Any sign erected upon or pro- jecting above the roof line of a structure to which it is affixed except signs erected below the top (the cap) of a parapet wall. Section 2. City Code Section 11.70, Subd. 2, Subparagraph 27, shall be and is amended to read as follows: 27. "Wall Area" - Is computed (by multiplying the distance) from the floor line to the roof line times the visible continuous width including windows and doors of the space occupied by the sign owner. Section 3. City Code Section 11.70, Subd. 4, shall be and is amended by adding Subd. J to read as follows: J. Airport District. 1. Wall signs are only permitted on buildings operated by persons, organizations, or businesses that are commercially licensed by the Metropolitan Airport Commission. (a) Walls not facing runway: The total area of all wall signs on any wall of a building shall not exceed 15% of the wall area when the wall area --- Indicates deleted language. [ ] Indicates new language. 21 1 2- does not exceed 500 square feet. When the wall area exceeds 500 square feet, the total area of a wall sign shall not exceed 75 square feet, plus 5% of the wall area in excess of 500 square feet, provided that the maximum sign area for any wall sign shall be 300 square feet. Wall area shall be computed individually for each tenant in a multi-tenant building based on the exterior wall area of the space the tenant occupies. (b) Walls facing runway: The total area of all wall signs shall not exceed 30% of the wall area. The maximum total sign area shall be 400 square feet. Wall area shall be computed individually for each tenant in a multi-tenant building based on the exterior wall area of the space the tenant occupies. 2. Free-standing Signs: Are permitted only on sites of buildings operated by persons, organizations, or businesses that are commercially licensed by the Metropolitan Airport Commission. Two free-standing accessory signs shall be permitted for each building site, provided one of the signs is on the side of the building facing the runway. The total area of each sign shall not exceed 80 square feet. The maximum height of free-standing signs shall be 20 feet. 3. Area Identification Signs: Only the Metropolitan Airport Commission may erect such signs. One sign per street frontage is allowed. Area identification signs shall not exceed 80 square feet and shall not exceed a maximum height of 20 feet. -2- 21'13 4. Gate Identification Signs: Only the Metro- politan Airport Commission may erect such signs. One sign at each gate is allowed. Gate identification signs shall not exceed 32 square feet and shall not exceed a height of 10 feet. 5. Building Identification Signs: Only the Metropolitan Airport Commission may erect such signs. One such sign per building is allowed. Building identification signs shall not exceed 6 square feet and must be attached flat against the wall of the building. 6. No other sign is permitted. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of Eden Prairie on the day of , 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of 1984. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1984. -3- Valley Lake Business Center CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 103-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the *land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the 1-2 District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the 1-2 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph 8, shall be, and are amended accordingly. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled *General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled *Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of October 2, 1984, entered into between Gerald Portnoy, an individual, and the City of Eden Prairie, and that certain Owner's Supplement to Developer's Agreement, between Ross and Pauline Petersen, husband and wife, and the City of Eden Prairie, dated as of October 2, 1984, which Agreement and Owner's Supplement are hereby made a part hereof. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 4th day of September, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 2nd day of October, 1984. ATTEST: 351-iii D. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of Exhibit A Valley Lake Business Center Legal Description for Platting and Rezoning That part of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter distant 980.00 feet east from the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter; thence northwesterly to a point on the southerly line of County Road No. 39 and passing through a point distant 650.00 feet east, at a right angle from a point on the west line of said Southwest Quarter distant 1110.71 feet north from the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter; thence northeasterly along the southerly line of said County Road No. 39 to the west line of the east 179.00 feet of said West Half of the Southwest Quarter; thence south along said west line to the south line of said Southwest Quarter; thence west along said south line to the point of beginning. Except Highway. DEVELOPER'S .AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1984, by and between Gerald Portnoy, an individual, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, .Developer has applied to City for Zoning from Rural to 1-2 for 'approximately 4.4 acres, and and Preliminary Plat of 10.6 acres into one lot and one outlot for an office/service structure of approximately 50,000 sq. ft., situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said entire 10.6 acres hereinafter referred to as "the property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Resolution #84-236, and Ordinance #103-84, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: 1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the materials revised and dated September 12, 1984, reviewed and approved by the City Council on September 4, 1984, and attached hereto as Exhibit 8, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein. 2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. Prior to release of the final plat by the City, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's approval of a permanent easement for access purposes, in recordable form, which shall run to the benefit of property to the east of the property being developed. 4. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property, 2 (11 Developer shall: A. Submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of plans for the overall signage for the - entire development. • Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above. B. Submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, and erosion control for the property as depicted on Exhibit B. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. C. Submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of the following: 1. A revised landscaping plan providing screening of the parking areas from Valley View Road. 2. Plans showing the details of the proposed retaining walls, and lighting for the property. Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the Director of Planning. D. Submit to the City, and receive the City's approval of a 20 ft. wide scenic easement, as depicted on Exhibit B, generally located along the 840 contour line. Upon approval by the City, Developer shall dedicate said easement to the City as depicted on Exhibit B, in accordance with the requirements listed in Exhibit C. 5. Developer agrees to confine grading to thai area of the property within the construction limits as shown on Exhibit B. Developer shall place snow fencing at the construction limits within the wooded areas prior to any grading upon the property. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning and receive the Director's approval of a tree inventory of those trees within the construction area and within 25 ft. outside of the construction area, indicating the size, type, and location of all trees twelve (12) inches in diameter, or greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground level. 2(17 Prior to issuance of any building permit for the property, Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of a replacement plan for all trees removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction area. Developer further agrees that said trees shall be replaced by similar tree species, diameter inch for diameter inch (i.e. a Red Oak 12 inches in diameter may be replaced by three Red Oaks four inches in diameter). The trees used for replacement shall be no less than three inches in diameter. Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the Director of Planning. 6. Developer shall notify the City and the Watershed District 48 hours prior to any grading, tree removal, or tree cutting on the property. 2. rig Valley Lake Business Center CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-256 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY Of ORDINANCE 103-84 AND ORDERING THE - PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 103-84 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the CityCouncil of the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of October, 1984; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 103-84, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for Inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 103-84 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on October 2, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk •=1.(0 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 103-84 .AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located south of Valley View Road at the northeast shore of Smetana Lake, from Rural District to 1-2, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/John D. Frane City Clerk /s/Wolfgang H. Penzel Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1984. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.) 12'1 Valley View Plaza CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 109-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the C-Reg District and be placed in the Office District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the C-Reg District and shall be included hereafter in the Office District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph 8, shall be, and are amended accordingly. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 4th day of September, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 2nd day of October, 1984. ATTEST: John D. Franc, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of 7 t72.- Exhibit A Valley View Plaza Legal Description for Plat- Outlot A, Bryant Lake Center Legal Description for Zoning- That part of Outlot A, BRYANT LAKE CENTER, according to the recorded plat thereof lying northerly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Outlot A; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 14 minutes 11 seconds East, along the west line of said Outlot A, a distance of 319.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 78 degrees 79 minutes 28 seconds East a distance of 309.81 feet to the westerly right-of-way line of Office Ridge Circle as dedicated in said BRYANT LAKE CENTER, and said line there terminating. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-257 A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF COUNCIL APPROVAL OF VALLEY VIEW PLAZA BY FRANTZ KLODT FOR 50,000 SQ. FT. OFFICE BUILDING BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal for a Valley View Plaza by Fran t z K l o d t f o r construction of a 50,000 sq. ft. office building, located north of Val l e y V i e w R o a d at Office Ridge Circle, is herein approved subject to the follow i n g s p e c i f i c conditions: 1. The revised development plan, preliminary plat, and erosion contr o l a n d grading plan, all dated September 12, 1984, and attached hereto shall a p p l y . 2. Prior to release of the final plat by the City, developer/owner shall: A. Submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's approval of a modified utility plan which provides for extension of the sewer and water lines to the western property line. B. Submit to the Director of Planning and receive the Director's approval of a modified landscape plan which shows increased plant materials sized as follows: Shade trees a minimum of three inches In caliper; Coniferous trees a minimum of eight feet in height; Developer/owner shall include several four-to-six inch caliper shade trees and several ten-to-twelve-foot high coniferous trees; Planting islands shall be introduced into the parking lot; A temporary berm shall be installed to effectively screen parking areas from 1-494; The slope along the east parking lot shall be reduced and supplemented with coniferous plantings. C. Submit detailed storm water run-off, grading, and erosion control plans to the City Engineer and the Watershed District for review. 3. Prior to issuance of any building permit on the property, developer/ o w n e r shall: A. Stake the construction limits with a snow fencing for protection of the property. B. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours prior to grading. C. Obtain access permits for work within Valley View Road from Hennepin County. D. Pay the the appropriate Cash Park Fee. 4. Concurrent with building construction, proponent shall: 217,q • A. construct Office Ridge Circle and the proposed private road to City standards. B. Construct the five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the west side of Office Ridge Circle. ADOPTED by the City Council on October 2nd, 1984. ATTEST: Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor Whn D. Frane, City Clerk These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licenseA activity. 1--(C.0 Pat Solie, Licensing • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST October 2, 1984 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) Charter Builders, Inc. Woodson Development Company Zastrow-Nasset Construction, Inc. CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY) Bruce Construction GAS FITTER Lakeview Heating & Air Conditioning HEATING. & VENTILATING Lakeview Heating & Air Conditioning GAMBLING Eden Prairie Foundation Ball - Raffle TYPE B FOOD Target Store CIGARETTES Target Store 2.1% CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-269 A RESOLUTION DENYING PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN - WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ('Plan"); and, - - WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and, WHEREAS, the proposal of Tandem Corporation for development of Muirfield Medium Density Residential use would require the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby denies the proposed amendment of the Plan for the following reasons: 1. The Developer has not provided adequate justification for the - Comprehensive Guide Plan Change; and, 2. Without adequate justification for the proposed Guide Plan Change, a precedent could be set in the Low Density Residential areas allowing up to 3.08 units per acre for other similarly situated projects. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 2nd day of October, 1984. Wilfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 21111 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-269 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and,. WHEREAS, the proposal of Tandem Corporation for development of Muirfield Medium Density Residential use requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: approximately 25 acres. located on the north side of Valley View Road, west of Park View Lane, be modified from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 2nd day of October, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 2177 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION f84-270 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE MUIRFIELD ADDITION FOR TANDEM CORPORATION BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of the Muirfield Addition for Tandem Corporation, dated September 15, 1984, consisting of approximately 36 acres for 110 single family residential lots, a:copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 2nd day of October, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frame,. City Clerk z/V) STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: WOUGH: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: FEE OWNER: REQUEST: Planning Comlission Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning September 21, 1984 Muirfield Tandem Corporation Alfred and Rose Pavelka 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density to Low and Medium Density Residential on 25 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 36 acres. 3. Preliminary Plat of 36 acres into 110 single family lots. 4. A Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on approximately 9.8 acres. 5. A Rezoning from Rural to R1-9.5 on approximately 26 acres. 6. Review of Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Background This item appeared before the Planning Commission on the July 10 and July 23, 1984, meetings. The item was reviewed by the City Council in August and was referred back to the Planning Commission for their review. The Staff Report will be a comparison between the current plan and plans previously reviewed by the Planning Commission for density, lot size, transition, and housing variety. There will also be a detailed review of the current site plan which includes grading, drain- age, sidewalks, and utilities. Density/Lot Size/Transition The following charts illustrates a 1 4") 0 t-' • ••• ••• • • ow. aft nn•n • i IAA ri Muirfield 2 September 21, 1984 comparison between past and current Muirfield site plans for density and lot size. R1-13.5 Ave. Lot Size 15,000 (13,500 min.) R1-9.5 Ave. Lot Size 10,500 (9,500 min.) July 20, 1984 Plan 3.18 units/acre 2.18 upa (24 lots) 4.18 upa (55 lots) 3.29 upa (36 lots) 17,000 (13,500 min.) 10,500 (7,800 min.) Current Plan Gross Density 3.08 units/acre R1-13.5 Density 2.36 upa (23 lots) R1-9.5 Density 3.38 upa (87 lots) The overall gross density of the project, based upon the revised site plan, at 110 units, is 3.08 units per acre. This compares with 3.18 units per acre, based upon the original plan, with 115 lots. The size of the lots in the R1-13.5 Zoning Distridt have decreased approximately 2,000 square feet on the average, no lots are less than 9,500 square feet in the R1-9.5 Zone. This represents approximately 1,700 additional square feet added to the smallest lot under the original proposal. Lot depths have changed in the R1-13.5 Zoning District; the average depth is about 25 feet less. This provides a smaller transition from the R1-22 to the R1-13.5 zoning. The street system has been modified somewhat under the current proposal; the attached original plan showed Muirfield Lane as a separate loop road with two access points onto Valley View Road. The current proposal shows the extension of Southshore Lane through the Rotland neighborhood. Site Plan Street frontages are comparable where the R1-13.5 zone is directly opposite the RI- 9.5 zone along Boyd Avenue. This is consistent with the original submittal. Street frontages within the R1-9.5 zone meet minimum requirements of 55 feet with the exception of Lot 1, Block 4, which is proposed at 54 feet. A readjustment in common lot lines would help meet this minimum requirement. There are a number of lots along the east side of Southshore Lane that average 55 feet in width over six lots. Staff feels that having this small street frontage will make it difficult to provide variety of housing units on these lots. Staff would suggest that lots be removed to increase the frontages to between 65 to 75 feet. Housing Variety Rotland will still be constructing units in the Muirfield project; however, the total number of Rotland Homes has been reduced from 55 to 49. The homes will not be proposed on a zero lot line basis; however, many of the original housing styles previously reviewed by the Commission will be within this project. There will be 'other housing types and styles intermixed with these units.' While housing variety will be possible under the R1-9.5 Zoning District, based upon compliance with City policy of no two units alike, side by side, opposite or diagonally across, however this may allow greater variety without architectural controls and common elements such as similar color schemes, building materials, roof pitches, and site amenities, such as landscaping and fencing. Staff understands 21(1 Muirfield 3 September 21, 1984 that Rotland will be proposing architectural controls to coordinate exterior materials which should help somewhat to provide a theme within the Rotland area. With the Rotland area, there are changes relative to landscaping and fencing. Fencing will not be included and the landscaping will be modified to include sodding only half of the property to a distance approximately parallel with the rear of the building, and the planting of one tree on the lot as compared with total sodding of the lots and two trees per lot under the original submittal, which also included a buffer zone in between the smaller R1-9.5 lots and the standard R1-9.5 lots. Grading There has been a major change in the grading plan since the last submittal. Review by the City Engineering Department determined the need for a ponding area to occur on this site to accommodate the extent of storm water runoff within the area. The size of the pond is approximately four-acre feet. This pond is proposed as a dry pond with an outlet in the southeast corner adjacent to Southshore Lane. There will also be a natural overland outlet to provide for drainage in the event that the catch basin would be clogged. The elevations are at 897.5 to 899.5 or two feet above the high water mark anticipated in the pond to minimize the possibility for flooding of basement areas. The ponding area is proposed as a drainage easement across the rear lot lines. Commission will note on the site plan that lots abutting the pond are deep. This allows on the minimum a distance of 110 feet of usable area oUtside of the easement. Given a typical 50-foot building pad and a front yard setback requirement of 30 feet, means there would be 30 feet of usable backyard area before the drainage easement. Depths of the yards, outside of the drainage easements, average closer to 140 feet. This dry pond area should be graded and restored as a part of the overall project construction, and should be protected from any additional peripheral lot grading or sediment by erosion control measures unitl all the lots are developed and restored. Pedestrian Systems Previous Staff Reports identified a need for sidewalks within the project because of the overall density and proximity to Valley View Road and the school and park recreational facilities northeast of the site. Staff would still recommend a five- foot wide concrete sidewalk along all roads and a five-foot wide bituminous connection into the proposed totlot area which would connect up to an existing bituminus walkway on school and park property. Conclusions The overall density of the project has not changed appreciably. There is a reduction in units from 115 to 110. The major difference is the way in which the units are sited on the property. The original concept plan had a marked transition between the low densities areas adjacent to Hidden Ponds and Sterling Fields to the smaller zero lot line areas in the southeast corner of the site. The new site plan has two density zones with lot sizes averaging between 15,000 to 10,500 square feet. All of the lots meet the minimum square footage requirements for R1-13.5 and R1-9.5 zoning. Densities of both zoning areas are within zoning requirements. There will be some architectural controls through the City policy a variety of units however they will not be as strict as those which would have been possible under the zero lot line concept area. 2 11 2-- Muirfield 4 September 21, 1984 If the Commission feels that the proponent has made an arguement for a c h a n g e i n t h e guide plan and that the new concept is reasonable as a use of the l a n d i n t e r m s o f density, providing for appropriate transitions and housing variety, t h e n S t a f f w o u l d recommend that approval be based upon the following: 1. Lots 4 through 9, Block 4, on the east side of Southshore Lane sh o u l d b e modified to have a minimum street frontages varied between 65 to 75 f e e t . 2. The proponent should submit an overall development plan keying specif i c u n i t types to lots in compliance with City policy for no two units alike, s i d e b y side, opposite or diagonally across from each other. 3. Revising the site plan to meet the minimum 55-foot street fr o n t a g e requirement for all lots. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Staff would recommend any of the following alternative courses o f a c t i o n t o t h e Commission. 1. The Planning Commission could recommend approval of the Comprehensi v e G u i d e Plan Change, Rezoning from Rural to R1-9.5 and RI-13.5, and a Pr e l i m i n a r y Plat of approximately 36 acres into 110 lots, a declaration of findi n g o f n o significance for the Environmental Assessment Worksheet, based on r e v i s e d plans dated September 15, 1984, subject to the recommendations of t h e S t a f f Report, dated September 21, 1984, and subject to the following: • A. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: 1. Modify the site plan to provide minimum 55-foot street frontages on all lots. - 2. Modify street frontages for Lots 4 through 9, Block 4, to a minimum of 65 to 75 feet. B. Prior to Final Plat, proponent shall: 1. Submit detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans to the Watershed District for review. ' 2. Submit detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. C. Prior to Building Permit issuance, proponent shall: 1. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee on a per unit basis. 2. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. 3. Submit an overall development plan keying specific unit types to lots within the R1-9.5 Zoning District consistent with City policy of no two units alike, side by side, 2 opposite, or diagonally across from each other. 2 1 61 ) Muirfield 5 September 21, 1984 4. Concurrent with buiding construction, construct five-foot concrete sidewalks along all residential streets and a five- foot wide bituminus walkway connection through the totlot area to the existing bituminum walkway in the park to the northeast of the site. 2. The Planning Commission could recommend denial of the request for the proponent if a substantial arguement for a Guide Plan Change has not been made, and that the site plan does not provide a reasonable use of the property in relationship to adjoining land uses. r . r , _ - t t•-'"." I ,! , fl• ---- „....\:- \ . 7. .7 : s .y.Z.., ir ,,..) % 4% L L ..V•., - — P. ,..•1/ !IN: n . ' SS ":....'-'' I. LI. 1"\\.. ' ' "•I.< - - ' '''s ' •. ' ,..11....7...Z. I ' . ;. i S. •' )-n,-.---71-. -C.' /... ,I, 1 --0.----7,,• ....3,:r.-r..e..:.........-..:-II ." I. a ,.. 4. .....n 7 ..c.i..4 .:7771 s 1 ----7-:;':-7:4---------- 'N „:......• , ....„. — .‘ ,. __.,....„, _........,_—,,___., .....,.., . • ., - ,.? ..., \.......s:-/ ......--- 1 i . .._. ..) f , ' li ....,• , N.,______:_tt-..........<\ I ... ..\-;•:1"u,,,',-.,..''''''CI,/c4 , -.C.'' •-;>V- `---, \---,--.S"'c \ •. \ \ JZ /...., A.:...N. k's-Lss . .7./ .--/ ... 1_ .._ LI, ii.----. -i----1 (• \ \...i __,,, i \.........„. , .............. ..,...„..„ ., ,„„ •••,,l. • •, ,....„... —, •-•I,, —•- • -1. ) L...... ....._ __ li • Nt ." . - ". r ......... S") a. • me am ••nn•nnn •••••• MNOS h A 1.1. 1. ...... s ‘ r ...A_. .—..,._.-----.\ . ..........T-,. .... . , , , , , , ....„........ •:,_)-;---_, 4--7 r/ i - 1..,..,, .\-. \it \ ‘4•.'i \ . i • .. '• ". "'it''1••••' 1 ! .. 1., \ :i \' \ t,‘ , , ..-v.- i ." • • ' - ,__1- J '' 1 ^.1 - .L . ' \ '4. . I , I.E k *\ \ ..•I''..: . ‘ k r( • . \ . \,.....1:11"--; • , \•\ ill ,...e4.1.• * il.....,./ .....i ...........„:.n irc\Lm ".• • :....-a,:,/\9‘t.S 1:: • \ ):4 2.• I r • V V! 7 ! • -.sts (1. f - robert Engstrom associates Inc 7101 LjORI4 avenue soutn • mirineapcills. minnesata • 55435 • C6123831-7973 September 28, 1984 Chris Eager City Planner City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Bluffs West 5th Addition Dear Chris, During the past 30 days, we have been actively working with a number of custom home-builders to interest them in the southern part of Eden Prairie. One of the areas for consideration is the Bluffs West 5th Addition. It has now come to my attention that a proposal has been made to reduce the 31 lots to 29 in order to obtain some larger lots. These larger lots would have to be priced higher and would be in a category where there is already a surplus inventory. Chris, I respectfully suggest that the size of lot is no assurance for obtaining attractive homes in this addition. The huge and obtrusive imitation tudor horie on the bluff, adjacent to the proposed plat, is a good example of this point. It is our intent to work with the Developer in obtaining qualified builders and to help establish the design guidelines for this addition. I believe that this approach will create a desire to build attractive, well-designed homes in this neighborhood. Please call me at 835-7070 if you would like to discuss any of these items in more detail. Rind Regards, Robert E:-EnAbtrom robert angstrom sack buxeR marc outman marueunci• architecture • lane DiannIna • landscape architecture • iroteacirs • dracInIcs • land development. land sales CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-271 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN A DES I G N A T E D F L O O D P L A I N A R E A FOR RICHARD W. ANDERSON, INC., FOR EDENVALE II WHEREAS, the land described in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and m a d e a p a r t h e r e o f , proposed for development by Richard W. Anderson, Inc., as Ed e n v a l e I I , h a s b e e n determined to be located in an officially designated Flood Plai n A r e a ; a n d , WHEREAS, Richard W. Anderson, Inc., has requested a permit to c o n s t r u c t a p o r t i o n o f the parking lot for Edenvale II within said Flood Plain Area; a n d , WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and Parks, Recreation, an d N a t u r a l R e s o u r c e s Commission have reviewed said request, and recommended approva l t h e r e o f , s u b j e c t t o specific conditions, to the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL O F T H E C I T Y O F E D E N PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS: That a permit for construction of a portion of the parking lot f o r E d e n v a l e II by Richard W. Anderson, Inc., be granted, based upon plans S t a f f - d a t e d S e p t e m b e r 10, 1984, and in accordance with Chapter 11, Section 11.45, Su b d i v i s i o n s 4 a n d 8 . . ADOPTED by the City Council on October 2, 1984. ATTEST: Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor Jain D. Frane, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #84-258 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EDENVALE II FOR ANDERSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Edenvale II for Anderson Development, Inc., dated July 12, 1984, consisting of 4.57 acres into one lot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of ,1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: JOhn D. Frame, City Clerk a 2 I .z 19 STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Comnission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Plailaing DATE: September 7, 1984 SUBJECT: Edenvale II APPLICANT/ Scott Anderson, Anderson Development, Inc. FEE OWNER: Equitable Life Assurance REQUEST: Preliminary Plat of 4.57 acres into one lot. Background This site is part of the Edenvale Industrial Park, previously platted and rezoned from I-General to 1-2 Park in 1972. The Guide Plan Identifies this site for an Industrial land use. The Guide Plan also depicts surrounding land uses as Industrial. The site lies within a flood plain area and is part of the conservancy transitional area of the Purgatory Creek study. The site slopes gently from a high point adjacent to Martin Drive to a low point adjacent to the golf course. There are a number of trees on-site, which consist primar- ily of poplar and low land species along the north property line and two mature oak trees, adjacent to Martin Drive, which will be included in .'the overall landscape plan. Provisions of the Shoreland Manage- ment Ordinance will apply since the property is within 300 feet of Purgatory Creek. Provisions of the Flood Plain Ordinance will also apply, since a portion of the building and parking areas fall within the 100-Year flood plain elevation. Edenvale II Industrial 2 September!, 1984 The request of the proponent involves a combination of two smaller lots into one large lot to accommodate the construction of a 71,800 square foot, office/warehouse building. Site Plan The 71,800 square foot, office/warehouse building is centrally located on-site, with the warehouse portion facing Martin Drive and the two-story office portions facing Purgatory Creek. The site is developed at a floor area ratio of 0.26, and meets minimum setback requirements for building and parking from all property lines. A total of 214 parking spaces are provided on-site. Current industrial zoning regulations would require the provision of 214 parking stalls, if based upon 50% office space at five spaces per 1,000, and 50% warehouse at 0.5 spaces per 1,000. If figured at three spaces per 1,000, code would require the provision of 215 parking stalls. Grading A minimal amount of grading work is proposed, with some cut required in the southwest portion of the site, which will be used to fill the lower areas of the site adjacent to the golf course. The use of a two-level building also minimizes the amount of grading required. The plan indicates that the upper level warehouse portion will be approximately ten feet higher than the lower portion of the office that faces Purgatory Creek. The grading plan indicates that a portion of the building, and nearly all of the lower level parking area, will be within the 100-Year flood plain elevation. Permanent structures may occur within this area, provided the lowest floor elevation Is a minimum of two feet above the flood elevation. The proposed elevations are at 843 for the lower level and 853 for the upper level. Parking is a permitted use within the flood plain area, however, Staff would expect that during 100-Year storm events, nearly all the parking area will be flooded. The proponent is providing for compensatory water storage by placing the ponding area on the extreme northern portion of the site to replace the existing storage area lost due to filling. Shoreland Management Ordinance Provisions of the Shoreland Management Ordinance apply since the property lies within 300 feet of the Normal Ordinary High Water Mark of Purgatory Creek. Since Purgatory Creek is a General Development Water, provisions of that section will apply, including a minimum lot size of five acres, a minimum width at the building setback line of 150 feet, a minimum width at the Ordinary High Water Mark of 150 feet, and a minimum setback from the Ordinary High Water Mark of 150 feet. This site is in compliance with these requirements, with the exception of the minimum lot size requirement. However, this proposed development of 4.57 acres is the result of the combination of two smaller lots that were platted in conformance with the minimum 1-2 zoning regulations in 1972 prior to the enactment of the Shoreland Management Ordinance in at 1982. The small portion of the site is within the conservancy district of the Purgatory Creek study area. The balance of the site lies within the transition zone. This study indicates a stand of lowland vegetation along the southern border of the site, which provides a natural screening of this area when viewed from the Fairway Woods 22,00 Edenvale II Industrial 3 September 7, 1984 Townhouses across Purgatory Creek. Since the majority of the site lies within the transitional area, development should be carefully analyzed for its visual and physical effects upon the area, Purgatory Creek, and adjoining land uses. Architecture The industrial building is proposed to be constructed primarily of exposed aggregate panel, with a beige limestone color and architecture metal panel, with a light sandstone beige color. There will be a high percentage of glass in the office portions of the building facing Purgatory Creek. The use of the two-story building breaks up the overall mass when viewed from the Fairway Woods Townhouses. However, the building does appear to be quite massive when viewed from Martin Drive. Extensive use of berming and large plant materials can help break up this building mass. Landscaping A landscape plan has been submitted depicting the type, size and location of proposed plant materials on-site. We would recommend that the size of the plant materials be increased to a 2-1/2-inch caliper minimum with a three-inch caliper average for shade trees. Additional coniferous trees should be introduced between ten to twelve feet in height to help break up the building mass when viewed from Martin Drive and to supplement the berm for screening of the loading and parking areas. Development of the pond in the lower portion of the site will remove an existing stand of lowland vegetation, which provides a natural screen of the proposed parking area when viewed from Fairway Wood Townhomes. Staff would recommend that a landscape plan include provisions for replacing this vegetation mass by introducing native plants such as dogwood, willow, and poplar, to provide this screen. However, because of the tight proximity of the ponding area to the property line, there may not be enough room to provide for these plantings. One solution would be to obtain permission from the golf course to plant some additional trees on the golf course. Or, if an adequate area for replacement of existing flood plain vegetation cannot be provided, the building may have to be reduced in size to reduce the size of the parking lot by one row. Utilities Sewer and water service can be provided to this site by connection to existing facilities within Martin Drive. Storm water run-off from the north parking lot will flow into two catch basins that connect to an existing storm sewer line which empties into an existing pond to the west of this property. Storm water run-off from the lower parking lot will sheet drain towards a proposed ponding area in the northern portion of the site. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the site plan amendment and preliminary plat of 4.57 acres into one lot subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: Edenvale II Industrial 4 September 7, 1984 A. Modify the landscape plan to increase plant material size t o a 2 - 1/2-inch minimum three-inch average. B. Provide a landscape buffer consisting of indigenous lo w l a n d materials along the north property line to screen parki n g a n d • loading areas from adjacent residential land uses and pub l i c r o a d s . If adequate area for replacement of existing flood plain veg e t a t i o n cannot be provided, the building may have to be reduced in o r d e r t o reduce the size of the parking lot by one row. 2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall: A. Submit detailed erosion control, grading, and storm water r u n - o f f plans for review by the Watershed District. _ B. Provide detailed erosion control, storm water run-off and gr a d i n g plans for review by the City Engineer. 3. Prior to Building Permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee. B. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in ad l i a n c e of grading. C. Stake the construction limits with a snow fence. 220 1- Planning Commission Minutes 3 September 10, 1984 B. _ . EDENVALE II, by Richard Anderson, Inc. Request for ZoningTistrict ------- Amendment within 1-2 Zoning District for Office/Warehouse and Preliminary Plat of 4.57 acres for one lot. Location: Southwest quadrant of Mitchell Road and Valley View Road. A public hearing. (Torjesen arrived at 8:15 p.m.) Mr. Scott Anderson, proponent, reviewed the site characteristics and architectural elements of the buildings proposed. Planner Enger reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report of September 7, 1984, with the Planning Commission. Planner Enger stated that a portion of the lot was located within the Purgatory Creek Conservancy Area. He stated that, as shown on the plans; proponents were suggesting the construction of a retention pond for flood retention purposes. He stated that the location chosen for this pond would result in the removal of significant amount vegetation from this site from the point of view from screening. He suggested that there were several alternatives available to this type of design: 1. Parking could be decreased on this site, which would allow more room for the location of the pond further south on the property. This would also mean a required decrease in the size of the building. 2. The pond could be located on the golf course. 3. The pond could remain in the same location as shown on the plans, however, vegetation could be replaced on the golf course. Marhula asked for an explanation of the internal circulation and use of the site. Mr. Anderson stated that the trucks and loading dock areas were -.located on the south side of the building, adjacent to an existing Industrial use. This allowed for the office portion of the building to be facing Purgatory Creek and the golf course. Marhula asked if the access to the parking lot was by steps, or, if the access was at-grade. Mr. Anderson responded that the access was anticipated to be at-grade. Marhula expressed concern that the amount of storage shown within the pond would not be adequate to replace the amount of lot area being filled and covered with impervious surface. Mr. Warren Istaelson, proponent's engineer, stated that the existing pond to the west of this site was also being excavated an additional two to three feet deeper than it currently existed to allow for storage purposes for both lots. Chairman Bearman asked about the transitional zone and how it applied to this site. Planner Enger responded that this was part of the Conservancy 2 2-05 Planning Commission Minutes 4 . September 10, 1984 District for Purgatory Creek. He stated that one of the things th e C i t y would not want to do would be to have truck docks facing the creek ar e a . I t Is better to have the parking in the transitional area and have it wel l screened, than to have truck docks in this location. Planner Enger p o i n t e d out that the City looks more carefully at the uses that are shown wit h i n t h e transitional zone. Regarding the ponding proposed, Planner Enger pointed out that most o f t h e lower parking lot shown on the site plan would be within the area o f t h e 100-year flood plain. At such times, the parking lot would be flood e d . M r . Israelson discussed the elevation of the parking lot, its relation s h i p t o the flood plain, and flooding potential for various storm years. I t w a s pointed out that the critical area right now was the culvert in M a r t i n Drive, which backed up approximately two feet with a ten-year f l o o d occurence. Planner Enger pointed out that the 25-year storm wit h i n t h e north parking lot would mean that the parking lot would be under two f e e t o f water. He stated that removal of the north row of parking would el i m i n a t e that area from potential flooding of vehicles under the 10- to 2 5 - y e a r storms, and would allow for additional room for ponding. Planner E n g e r suggested that proponent might consider elevating that area along the n o r t h edge of the parking lot to a point where only eight inches of water, i n s t e a d of two feet of water, would be the result of a 25-year flood occurence. Hallett asked what the position of the Purgatory Creek Watershed Dis t r i c t would be regarding allowing a parking lot in a flood plain. Staff res p o n d e d that parking lots were an allowed use within the 100-year flood plain. Torjeson asked about the Conservancy Area as it affected this pr o j e c t . Planner Enger pointed out that the northeast corner of the parking l o t w a s within the Conservancy Area. He explained that the Conservancy Ar e a h a d been adopted as a policy document by the City Council at the time of r e v i e w of the Purgatory Creek Watershed District. Planner Enger stated that i t would be situational as to which types of uses would be allowed wit h i n t h e Conservancy Area. For example, the Parkview Treatment Center, an d i t ' s parking lot were entirely within the Conservancy zone. Torjeson asked if deepening of the pond would be acceptable based o n t h e location of the ground water table. Mr. Israelson explained how the f l o w o f storm water would work. He stated that, based upon the locati o n a n d v , elevation of the water tables, the pond would be able to drain. Torjeson stated that he felt alternative 13 of reducing the building a n d t h e parking area for the site would be a realistic alternative f o r t h e proponents to consider. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Hallett, to close the public hearing. Motion carried--6-0-0 22-014 Planning Commission Minutes 5 September 10, 1984 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Torjesen, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Richard Anderson, Inc., for Zoning District Amendment within the 1-2 Zoning District for an office/warehouse on 4.57 acres, based on plans Staff-dated September 10, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 7, 1984, and with the following added condition: Proponent shall meet with Staff regarding the parking lot flooding situation and determine which of the three alternatives discussed at the Planning Commission meeting of September 10, 1984, is most acceptable, prior to Council review. Should the solution significantly alter the plan, or should there be difficulty in determination of an acceptable solution, the proponent shall return to the Planning Commission for additional review of the project. Motion carried --6 -0 -0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Schuck, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Richard Anderson, Inc., for Preliminary Plat of 4.57 acres into one lot for an office/warehouse, based on plans Staff-dated September 10, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 7, 1984, and with the following added condition: Proponent shall meet with Staff regarding the parking lot flooding situation and determine which of the three alternatives discussed at the Planning Commission meeting of September 10, 1984, is most acceptable, prior to Council review. Should the solution significantly alter the plan, or should there be difficulty in determination of an acceptable solution, the proponent shall return to the Planning Commission for additional review of the project. Motion carried--6-0-0 22-0S TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John D. Frane, Finance Director DATE: September 27, 1984 RE: M.I.D.B.'s for Valley View Associates Project Resolution No. 84-272 - $3,000,000 Ryan Construction intends to construct a 62,000 square foot building in the Equitable P.U.D. The building, to be leased to others, could employ 155 people. The City will have $189,000 of cap left if the McGlynn request, later in the agenda, is approved. This request, if approved, would allow Ryan to shop for unused cap and the City could enter into a joint powers agreement with a City(s) which has unused cap. It would also allow Ryan to apply directly to the State. There also exists the possibility that a project approved under the cap will not proceed. We could give Ryan these forfeited caps. At this time neither Q Petroleum or Reynolds Printing has given us the required 1%. Computer Depot and Portnoy have not closed. Equity is estimated to be $130,000. The sale would be public backed by the strength of Ryan itself. Resolution No. 84-272 is included for your consideration. A motion authorizing 1 or more joint powers agreement with other Citys and to give Ryan first dibs on forfeited caps would be in order if you approve this request. JOE:bw 9/27/84 alp ( . CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA Application for Industrial Development Dead Project Financing 1. APPLICANT: a. Business Name - Valley View Associates b. Business Address - (General Partner's Address) Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc. 7401 Metro Boulevard, Suite 500, Edina, MN 55435 c. Business Form (corporation, partnership, sole proprietor- ship, etc.) - Partnership d. State of Incorporation or organization - Minnesota e. Authorized Representative - Al Schackman *f. Phone - 835-7990 2. NAME(S) AND ADDRESSES OF MAJOR STOCKHOLDERS OR PRINCIPALS: a. General Partner, Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc. 7401 Metro Boulevard, Suite 500 Edina, MN 55435 b. C. -1- 2Z07 3. GIVE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF BUSINESS, PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS, ETC: The Partnership was formed expressly for the purpose of developing the Project. The General Partner is a leading developer and general contractor of many corrmercial.and industrial projects throughout the State. 4. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT The Project calls for construction of an approxiinate 62,000 square foot masonry (brick and glass) building located on 4.9 acres of land.. a. Location and intended use: The Project will be located on 4.9 acres of land on Valley View Road between Schooner Boulevard and Mitchell Street. The Project Is an office/warehouse/production building for hi-tech tenants. b. Present ownership of project site: Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States c. Names and address of architect, engineer, and general contractor: Architect Engineer Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc. General Contractor 5. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST FOR: Land 586,970 Construction Contracts 2,153,931 Equipment Acquisition and installation* -0- Architectural and Engineering Legal Interest during Construction 98.080 Bond Reserve -0- Contingencies Loan Fees& Issuance Expenses Other (Park Dedication & Leasing Fees) ' Total $ 3,130,000 *Heating and air conditioning should be included as building costs. Indicate the kind of equipment to be acquired here. • 113 519 100,000 58,500 Included in construction contracts 19,000 -7- -27:o? 6. BOND ISSUE - a. Amount of proposed bond issue - b. Proposed date of sale of bond - $3,000,000 November 5, 1984 c. Length of bond issue and proposed maturities - Maximum of 30 yea r s with the principal payments structured to produce level debt service d. Proposed original purchaser of bonds - Juran & Moody, Inc., Minnesota Mututal Life Building, 400 North Robert Street, Suite 800, St. Paul, MN 55101 e. Name and address of suggested trustee - First Trust Company of Saint .Paul, 332 Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55101 f. Copy of any agreement between Applicant and original purchaser - None g. Describe any interim financing sought or available - None other than from bond proceeds h. Describe nature and amount of any permanent financing in addition to bond financing - None 7. BUSINESS PROFILE - a. Are you located in the City of Eden Prairie? No • b. Number of employees in Cden Prairie? i. Before this project: -3- ii. After this project? Approximately 155 employees of project tena n t s c. Approximate annual sales — Not applicable d. Length of time in business New Partnership formed to develop this particular Project, however the General Partner has been in the real estate development business for approximately 50 years in Eden Prairie The General Partner has other projects in the city in whi c h it has an equity interest, but the subject project will be the only one attributable to the Partnership e. Do you have plants in other locations? If so, where? None I. Are you engaged in international trade? No 8. OTHER INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT(S): a. List the name(s) and location(s) of other industrial development project(s) in which the Applicant is the owner or a "substantial user" of the facilities or a "releated person" within the meaning of Section 103(b)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code. None —4— 22-1 0 b. List all cities in which the Applicant h a s r e q u e s t e d industrial revenue development financing . None c. Detail the status of any request the App l i c a n t h a s b e f o r e any other city for industrial development r e v e n u e f i n a n c i n g . None d. List any city in which the Applicant has b e e n r e f u s e d industrial development revenue financing. None e. List any city (and the project name) whe r e t h e A p p l i c a n t has acquired preliminary approval to pro c e e d b u t i n w h i c h final approval authorizing the financing h a s b e e n d e n i e d . None. 22_1 1 f. If Applicant has been denied industrial development revenue financing in any other city as identified in (d) or (e), specify the reason(s) for the denial and the name(s) of appropriate city officials who have knowledge of the transaction. Not applicable 9. NAMES AND ADDRESS OF: a. Underwriter (If public offering) Juran & Moody, Inc. Minnesota Mututal Life Building 500 North Robert - Suite 800 St. Paul, MN 55101 ATTN: LEONARD CHAMPER, V.P., ANDREW K. MERRY, V.P. b. Private Placement Purchaser (If private placement) Not applicable i. If lender will not commit until City has passed its preliminary resolution approving the project, submit a letter from proposed lender that it has an interest in the offering subject to appropriate City approval and approval of the Commissioner of Securities. John Kirby b. Bond Counsel - Dorsey & Whitney 510 North Central Life Tower 445 Minnesota street St. Paul, MN 55101 c. Corporate Counsel - Dewey Joseph Dorsey & Whitney 2200 First Bank Place East Minneapolis, MN 55402 d. Accountant - Main Hurdman 700 Missabe Building Duluth, MN 55802 10. WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR: a. Construction start - November, 1984 b. Construction completion - April, 1985 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Al Schackman at 835-7990 Len Champer or Andy Merry at 224-1500 The undersigned Applicant understands that the approval or disapproval by the City of Eden Prairie for Industrial Development bond financing dues not expressly or impliedly constitute any approval, variance, or waiver of any provision or requirement relating to any zoning, -building, or other rule or ordinance of the City of Edon Prairie, or any other law applicable to the property included in this project. Applicant By Date -7- 22-IS 11. ZONING - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT a. Property is zoned - b. Present zoning (is) (is not) correct for the intended use. C. Zoning application received on for which is correct for the intended use. d. Variances required - City Planner -8- .22-1 LI Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DETERMINING TO PROCEED WITH A PROJECT AND ITS FINANCING UNDER THE MINN E S O T A MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT; RE F E R R I N G THE PROPOSAL TO THE MINNESOTA ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR APPRO V A L A N D AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOC U M E N T S BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of t h e C i t y o f E d e n Prairie, Minnesota (the City) as follows : Section 1. Recitals and Findings. 1.1. This Council has received a proposa l t h a t t h e City finance a portion or all of the cos t o f a p r o p o s e d p r o j e c t under Minneosta Statutes, Chapter 474 (t h e A c t ) , c o n s i s t i n g o f the acquisition of land and construction a n d e q u i p p i n g o f a n approximately 62,000 square foot office/ w a r e h o u s e / p r o d u c t i o n facility in the City (the Project) by Va l l e y V i e w A s s o c i a t e s , a Minnesota partnership (the Borrower). T h e P r o j e c t i s l o c a t e d at Valley View Road between SChooner Bou l e v a r d a n d M i t c h e l l Street in the City. 1.2. At a public hearing, duly noticed a n d h e l d o n October 2, 1984, in accordance with the A c t , o n t h e p r o p o s a l t o undertake and finance the Project, all p a r t i e s w h o a p p e a r e d a t the hearing were given an opportunity t o e x p r e s s t h e i r v i e w s with respect to the proposal to underta k e a n d f i n a n c e t h e Project. Based on the public hearing and s u c h o t h e r f a c t s a n d circumstances as this Council deems rele v a n t , t h i s C o u n c i l hereby finds, determines and declares as f o l l o w s : (a) The welfare of the State of Minnesota re q u i r e s active promotion, attraction, encouragem e n t a n d d e v e l o p m e n t o f economically sound industry and commerce t h r o u g h g o v e r n m e n t a l acts to prevent, so far as possible, emer g e n c e o f . b l i g h t e d lands and areas of chronic unemployment, a n d t h e S t a t e o f Minnesota has encouraged local governme n t u n i t s t o a c t t o prevent such economic deterioration. (b) The Project would further the general pu r p o s e s contemplated and described in Section 4 7 4 . 0 1 o f t h e A c t . (c) The existence of the Project would add t o t h e t a x base of the City, the County and School D i s t r i c t i n w h i c h t h e 2 V:, Project is located and would provide increased opportunities. for employment for residents of the City and surrounding area. (d) This Council -has been adivsed by the Borrower that conventional, commercial financing to pay the cost of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be significantly reduced, but that with the aid of municipal borrowing, and its resulting lower borrowing cost, the Project is economically more feasible. (e) This Council has also been advised by the Borrower that on the basis of its discussions with potential buyers of tax-exempt bonds, revenue bonds of the City (whicn may be in the form of a commercial development revenue note or notes) could be issued and sold upon favoraole rates and terms to finance the Project. (f) The City is authorized by the Act to issue its revenue bonds to finance capital projects consisting of properties used and useful in connection with a revenue producing enterprise, such as that of the Borrower, and the issuance of the bonds by the City would be a substantial .inducement to the Borrower to acquire, construct and equip the Project. Section 2. Approvals and Authorizations. 2.1. On the basis of the information given the City to date, it appears that it would be desirable for the City to issue its revenue bonds under the provisions of the Act, in one or more series, to finance the Project in the estimated total amount of $3,000,000. 2.2. The Council hereby determines to proceed with the Project and its financing, and hereby declares its present intent to have the City issue its revenue bonds under the Act to finance the Project, subject to the approval of the Project by the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the adoption of this resolution shall not be deemed to establish a legal obligation on the part of the City or this Council to issue or to cause the issuance of such revenue bonds. The City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and, accordingly, not issue the revenue bonds should tne City at any time prior to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest of the City not to issue the revenue bonds or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reacn agreement as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction. All details of such revenue bond issue and the provisions for payment thereof shall be subject to the mutual agreement of this Council, the Borrower and the purchaser or purchasers of the revenue bonds and such further conditions as the City may specify, such agreement and specification on the part of the City to be evidenced by a resolution of this Council authorizing the issuance of the revenue bonds on the terms and conditions agreed upon and authorizing the execution of necessary documents. In all events, it is understood that the revenue bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City except the revenues pledged to payment of such revenue bonds, and each bond, when, as and if issued, shall recite in substance that the bond, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenues received from the Project and any property pledged to the payment thereof and shall not consitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional, statutory or charter limitation. 2.3. The Application to the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority, with attachments, is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute said documents on behalf of the City. 2.4. The Borrower has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all direct and indirect costs incurred by the City in connection with the Project, whether or not tne Project is carried to completion, and whether or not approved by the Energy and Economic Development Authority, and whether or not the City by resolution authorizes the issuance of the bonds, will be paid by the Borrower upon request. 2.5 The City's entitlement allocation for the year 1984, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 582, 1984 Laws of Minnesota, is $ , of which all but $547,000 has been previously committed by the City. Consequently, nothing herein shall be construed as obligating the City to provide the Project with any portion of its 1984 entitlement allocation. Further, nothing herein shall be construed as obligating the City to provide an entitlement allocation for any year subsequent to 1984. Additionally, the preliminary approval of the City expressed herein is subject to the condition that within twelve months of the date of adoption of this resolution the City and the Borrower shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the bonds and of the other instruments and proceedings relating to the bonds and their issuance and sale. If the events set forth herein do not take place within the time set forth above, or any extension thereof, and the bonds are not sold within such 22-I1 time, this resolution shall expire an d b e o f n o f u r t h e r e f f e c t . Adopted this 2nd day of October, 1984. Mayor Attest: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the fo r e g o i n g r e s o l u t i o n was duly seconded by Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the fo l l o w i n g v o t e d i n f a v o r thereof: and the following voted against the sa m e : whereupon the resolution was declared d u l y p a s s e d a n d a d o p t e d . 22 /7 OCTOBER 2,1984 . CANINE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT LIQUOR WINE WINE LIQUOR LIQUOR LIQUOR CO WINE WINE EXPENSES SECURITY SEMIN CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT REFUND-FITNESS CLASSES REFUND-FITNESS CLASSES REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES REFUND-SKATING CLASSES REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES REIMBURSE PLUMBING EXPENSES LIQUOR WINE WINE LIQUOR WINE WINE LIQUOR LIQUOR WINE PAYROLL 9/14/84 PAYROLL 9/14/84 PAYROLL 9/14/84 PAYROLL 9/14/84 PAYROLL 9/14/84 PAYROLL 9/14/84 PAYROLL 9/14/84 DUES PAYROLL 9/14/84 SEPT 84 PACKET DELIVERY . SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT PAYROLL 9/14/84 STREET LIGHTS AUGUST 84 SALES TAX BOOKS-POLICE DEPT 144T VOID OUT CHECK 1601, RAY ALLEN MFG CO 16034 INTERCONTINENTAL PCKG CO 16035 EAGLE WINE CO 16036 TWIN CITY WINE CO 16037 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO 16038 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR 16039 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC 16040 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING 16041 QUALITY WINE CO 16042 PETTY CASH 16043 MSP CIVIL AVIATION 16044 SHIRLEY DENNARDT 16045 ELLEN KES 16046 SUZANNE BUTZOW 16047 KATHY WELLS 16048 CONNIE STUMPF 16049 SANDRA LISTIAK 16050 KAREN EDSTROM 16051 CAROL GALLAGHER 16052 ADRLENNE RICE 16053 BARB SCHOLER 16054 SANDY ROOENZ 16055 SUSAN TINEBRA 16056 LINDA-KRAMER 16( KATIE WALBURG 160N1 JAKE & COURTNEY PETERSON 16059 RYAN & SHANNON WELLS 16060 NICOLE HOLCOMBE 16061 HOLLY SCHIPPERS 16062 ROBERT PETERSON 16063 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO 16064 EAGLE WINE CO 16065 INTERCONTINENTAL PCKG CO 16066 QUALITY WINE CO 16067 TWIN CITY WINE CO 16068 PRIOR WINE CO 16069 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR 16070 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC 16071 PAUSTIS & SONS CO 16072 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK 16073 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 16074 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 16075 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO 16076 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM 16077 GREAT WEST LIFE INSURANCE CO 16078 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS 16079 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG 16080 PERA 16.0 -1 DANA GIBBS 2 HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY 16083 NORWEST BANK HOPKINS 16084 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO 16085 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 16086 MINNESOTA DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION 25.00- 88.32 1013.94 149.70 722.25 6031.00 1856.66 2872.76 593.46 1805.82 62.74 20.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 ' 26.00 17.00 26.00 28.00 12.00 1.00 54.00 4321.94 545.42 51.54 1721.01 457.56 1142.83 3037.09 3859.77 100.48 18454.24 9438.07 12701.14 114.00 35.00 4039.00 100.75 647.85 15399.04 65.00 75.00 570.00 561.00 15875.87 21.50 10900275 72_1 °) 16087 BOB LAMBERT 16088 GARY & PATRICIA KOSTECKA 16089 EUGENE DIETZ 16090 COLLEEN FITZGERALD 160 PAM SWANSON 16044 NANCY ANDERSON 16093 WALTER LUS IAN 16094 PAT HEANEY 16095 MARK HAGEN 16096 PAUL ZIPF 16097 WANDA TEPLY 16098 MELANIE SPAULDING 16099 DONN ANDRUS 16100 JERRY LORD 16101 RALPH KRATOCHVIL 16102 CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN TRANS CO 16103 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO 16104 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC 16105 INTERCONTINENTAL PCKG CO 16106 PAUSTIS & SONS CO 16107 TWIN CITY WINE CO 16108 QUALITY WINE CO 16109 EAGLE WINE CO 16110 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR 16111 JANELLE ANDERSON 16112 NIKKI ANDERSON 16113 RITA ANDERSON 16114 PRISCILLA ANN BAILEY 16I'; JUDITH E BAKER 16t. JOAN S BARTH 16117 ADELINE M BRAMWELL 16118 JEANNE BRANDT 16119 JOY BREKKE 16120 CHERYL M BRIDGE 16121 ROBERTA BRONSON 16122 SHARON R BUNTIN 16123 CAROL J BURNETT 16124 DAWN BUSCH 16125 BARBARA G CAIL 16126 GRACE B CARMODY 16127 MILDRED CLARK 16128 LOUISE J DOUGHTY 16129 NANCY DOWNEY 16130 DOROTHY FITZGERALD 16131 PERRY FORSTER 16132 BETTY L FRITZ 16133 HARLAN D FRITZ 16134 VIRGINIA K GARTNER 16135 JINNY GIBSON 16136 CHERYL GLISCZINSKI 16137 GLADYS GRANNES 16138 CHERYL HANSEN 16139 HELLEN HAUPT lt' 1 HELEN HEGGE 2756929 EXPENSES-BFI INSPECTION TRIP TREE REMOVAL AUGUST 84 EXPENSES REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES REFUND-POST NATAL CLASSES REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES REFUND-MEMBERSHIP FEES REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES INSTRUCTOR/EXERCISE CLASSES/FEES PD ROADWAY EASEMENT LIQUOR LIQUOR WINE WINE WINE LIQUOR WINE LIQUOR ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE 802.24 4300.00 165.00 6.00 6.00 25.00 17.00 17.00 34.00 34.00 34.00 10.00 20.75 9.00 26.00 7600.00 3563.79 3031.51 799.87 298.92 905.67 1358.25 273.98 2271.31 66.00 66.00 66.00 66.00 64.00 64.00 76.00 76.00 66.00 66.00 66.00 64.00 66.00 66.00 64.00 64.00 24.00 64.00 66.00 66.00 14.00 64.00 66.00 64.00 76.00 126.00 66.00 66.00 66.00 66.00 22 .70 16141 16142 16143 161 44 10 1614b 16147 16148 16149 16150 16151 16152 16153 16154 16155 16156 16157 16158 16159 16160 16161 16162 16163 16164 16165 16166 16167 16168 10" 161 16171 16172 16173 16174 16175 16176 16177 16178 16179 16180 16181 16182 16183 16184 16185 16186 16187 16188 16189 16190 16191 16192 16193 1&" ' 64.00 64.00 78.00 66.00 64.00 78.00 128.00 78.00 26.00 26.00 24.00 66.00 66.00 64.00 24.00 74.00 10.00 26.00 66.00 78.00 64.00 64.00 24.00 24.00 66.00 64.00 66.00 64.00 66.00 68.00 64.00 64.00 78.00 68.00 64.00 66.00 66.00 66.00 64.00 26.00 12.00 64.00 64.00 76.00 66.00 64.00 68.00 64.00 161.66 8774.34 103.50 190.70 2312.00 768.00 MARY B HELFAND ELECTION JUDGE BERNICE HOLASEK ELECTION JUDGE ALLENE HOOKOM ELECTION JUDGE ELAINE JACQUES ELECTION JUDGE BILL JELLISON ELECTION JUDGE SHIRLEY JELLISON ELECTION JUDGE LINDA K JIRAN ELECTION JUDGE DORIS JOHNSON ELECTION JUDGE LYLE JOHNSTON ELECTION JUDGE PAULINE JOHNSTON ELECTION JUDGE PATTY JONES ELECTION JUDGE SUE A KELLER ELECTION JUDGE DELORES KLEIN ELECTION JUDGE DONNA KNIGHT ELECTION JUDGE MARGARET R KRUGER ELECTION JUDGE SUE LANE ELECTION JUDGE DON LARSON ELECTION JUDGE LORRAINE LARSON ELECTION JUDGE ELEANOR LEVINE ELECTION JUDGE GEORGE-ANN LILLIE ELECTION JUDGE NANCY LITTLE ELECTION JUDGE MARILYN LuNDEEN ELECTION JUDGE VIOLA E MCFAIN ELECTION JUDGE BILL MCNEIL ELECTION JUDGE JUDY MILLER ELECTION JUDGE JOYCE MYHRE ELECTION JUDGE A L NELSON ELECTION JUDGE CAROLINE B NELSON ELECTION JUDGE MARION L NESBITT ELECTION JUDGE SHARON NOLTE ELECTION JUDGE JANET E OLSON ELECTION JUDGE RUTH m OLSON ELECTION JUDGE BERNADETTE PLOUMEN ELECTION JUDGE JAMES RANNOw ELECTION JUDGE AURELIA A RASINSKI ELECTION JUDGE LAuRINA REIFF ELECTION JUDGE EVELyN ROGERS ELECTION JUDGE BETTY SCHAITBERGER ELECTION JUDGE DOROTHY ScHwARTZ ELECTION JUDGE TOmmY THOMAS ELECTION JUDGE WALTER E THOMPSON ELECTION JUDGE RUTH L TRAASETH ELECTION JUDGE MARY UPTON ELECTION JUDGE BARBARA VANDERPLOEG ELECTION JUDGE DARLENE wEGNER ELECTION JUDGE MARIE WITTENBERG ELECTION JUDGE JO ANN WRONSKI ELECTION JUDGE THOMAS J ZALUSKY ELECTION JUDGE ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES ALASKAN AIR CONDITIONING INC REPAIR VALVE-COMMUNITY CENTER ARMOR SECURITY INC 4TH QTR 84 SECURITY ALARM ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC BLACKTOP-STREET DEPT ASSOCIATED LITHOGRAPHERS PRINT COMMUNITY ED BOOK AT 8, T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 1515420 2 2_21 16195 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS 16196 ATLAS CONCRETE & MASONRY 16197 TERRY AUSTIN 1619° CAROL BENSMAN 161 ,. BIG BOBS REPAIR SHOP 16200 BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC & MFG CO 16201 ISAAC BLAKEY 16202 B R W INC 16203 BROWN & CRIS INC 16204 ROZ BURNSTEIN 16205 BUTCHS BAR SUPPLY 16206 CHAMPIONSHIP AWARDS 16207 CHEMLAWN 16208 US DEPT OF COMMERCE 16209 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 16210 COPY EQUIPMENT INC 16211 CPT CORP 16212 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC INC 16213 DALCO 16214 DIRECTOR OF PROPERTY TAXATION 16215 CHARLES P DOWNER 16216 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU 16217 STEVEN C DURHAM 16218 JOY EASTMAN 16219 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 16? EL MARKETING 161- EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 16222 EMPIRE-CROWN AUTO INC 16223 EAU CLAIRE COUNTY 16224 FEDERAL EXPRESS 16225 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN 16226 FLEET MAINTENANCE INC 16227 FLOYD SECURITY 16228 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC 16229 LAURIE GILK 16230 GLEN LAKE BAKERY 16231 B F GOODRICH TIRE CENTER 16232 HACH CO 16233 JACK HACKING 16234 HANCE HARDWARE 16235 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL CENTERS 16236 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT 16237 HENNEPIN COUNTY 16238 HONEYWELL 16239 IMPERIAL INC 16240 IRON MOUNTAIN FORGE 16241 JAK OFFICE PRODUCTS CO 16242 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC 16243 KELLOGGS LEBODY SHOP 16244 KOHLER MIX SPECIALTIES 16 LANCE SERVICE CONCRETE WALK-STARING LAKE PK INSTRUCTOR/EXERCISE CLASSES/FEES PO INSTRUCTOR-KIDS KORNER REPAIR JAIL LOCK-P/S BLDG BELT-WATER DEPT SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD -SERVICE-EDEN ROAD/CITY WEST STREETS/ -ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY/SHADY OAK RD & -FLYING CLOUD DR/VALLEY VIEW RD/PRAIRIE CENTER DR REFUND-PLBG PERMIT SUPPLIES-KIDS KORNER SUPPLIES-L/S CANINE AWARDS-POLICE DEPT LAWN APPLICATION-P/S BLDG & CITY HALL FEE-ASSISTANT MANAGER SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DR PAINT-DRAINAGE DEPT OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT CLEANING SUPPLIES-P/S BLDG & COMM 2ND HALF OF 1984 PROPERTY TAXES SOFTBALL OFFICAL/FEES PD SUPPLIES-ROUND LAKE CONCESSIONS MILEAGE-PLANNING DEPT EXPENSES-C/C DUES-LIQUOR STORE BALLOT & TRANSFER CASES-ELECTION 1ST AID EQUIP-FIRE DEPT SHOCKS/TEST LAMPS/PAINT WITHHOLDING FROM EMPLOYEE PER COURT FREIGHT CHARGES-CANINE UNIT BOOK-FIRE DEPT BRAKE PADS-EQUIP MAINT 4TH QTR 84 ALARM SYSTEM RADIO REPAIR & PARTS SERVICE-SWIMMING AID EXPENSES-ELECTION 2 TIRES-EQUIP MAINT LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT REPAIR LOCKS-COMMUNITY CENTER SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT AUGUST 84 BOOKING FEES AUGUST 84 BOARDING OF PRISONERS SEPT-NOV 84 SECURITY SYSTEM-L/S HANDLING CHARGES-STREET GARAGE 8 PEDESTAL BENCHES-STARING LAKE PK OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT OFFICE SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR-EXERCISE CLASSES/FEES PD CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-ROUND LAKE SUPPLIES-L/S 27.60 2975.00 1001.60 17.50 25.00 213.54 75.00 28414.68 8.40 7.00 135.25 13.66 471.20 35.00 4674.73 49.14 89.60 61.62 CENTER 225.40 1485.63 137.50 188.92 18.00 6.92 ' 200.00 161.63 6.32 110.10 ORDER 3.00 99.39 20.00 31.90 289.17 120.09 45.00 33.20 79.46 217.60 62.76 27.26 120.00 137.09 4564.30 325.25 51.12 1808.29 27.20 8.88 539.93 135.40 128.42 4971065 16246 LEEF BROS INC 16247 LOGIS 16248 BETH LUOMA 1624 0 LYMAN LUMBER CO 162 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC 16251 MATTS AUTO SERVICE INC 16252 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO 16253 METRO ALARM INC 16254 METRO FONE COMM INC 16255 METRO PRINTING INC 16256 METROPOLITAN FIRE EQUIP CO 16257 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM 16258 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO 16259 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP 16260 MPLS/STP METRO AIRPORT COMMISSION 16261 MN DEPT OF P/S 16262 MINNESOTA GAS CO 16263 MINNESOTA REC & PARK ASSOC 16264 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC 16265 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC 16266 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP 16267 EARL MORE 16268 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO 16269 MY CHEESE SHOP 16270 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO 16271 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO 16272 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO 16273 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO 162 - NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO 16/ CURT OBERLANDER 16276 OCHS BRICK & TILE CO 16277 CHARLES J PAPPAS 16278 PARK AUTO UPHOLSTERY 16279 CLIFFORD PATTERSON 16280 JACK PEARSON 16281 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO 16282 PATRICK PEREZ 16283 WILLIE PEREZ 16284 CONNIE L PETERS 16285 PITNEY PONES 16286 POMMER MEG CO INC 16287 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 16288 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS 16289 JAMES PUFAHL 16290 R & R SPECIALTIES INC 16291 REAL ESTATE GRAPHICS INC 16292 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC 16293 CRAIG ROGERS 16294 ROGNESS SERVICE SALES 16295 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES INC 16296 STEVEN R SINELL 16297 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP 1E( SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC COVERALLS/RUGS/OUSTMOPS AUGUST 84 SERVICE SERVICE-SWIMMING AID LUMBER PULLEY/PULLEY ALTERNATOR-EQUIP MAINT TOWING SERVICE OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT 4TH QTR 84 ALARM SYSTEM SEPTEMBER 84 PAGER RENTAL FORMS-FORESTRY DEPT CHEMICALS-FIRE DEPT AUGUST 84 SAC CHARGES CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CTR BLACKTOP RENT-PARK DEPT CRT RENTAL-POLICE DEPT SERVICE TOUCH FOOTBALL REGISTRATIONS/FEES PD ADS-LIQUOR STORES EMPLOYMENT AD-COMMUNITY CENTER SERVICE EXPENSES-SUNBONNET DAYS PULLEY/SPACER/SPINDLE PIN/WHEEL-PARK MAINT FOOD FOR ELECTION JUDGES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE-HOMEWARD HILLS PK SERVICE SERVICE EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT CONCRETE-STARING LAKE PK CONFERENCE & MILEAGE EXPENSES REPAIR CAR SEAT-POLICE DEPT SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD EXPENSES-SUNBONNET DAYS POP FOR CONCESSION STAND-COMMUNITY CENTER SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD MILEAGE 4TH QTR 84 POSTAGE METER RENTAL HORSESHOE TROPHIES/FEES PD ELECTRICAL WIRING-PARK MAINT REPAIR TAPE RECORDER SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD SHARPEN ZAMBONI BLADES TRANSFER SHEETS-ASSESSING -SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD DR/NORSEMAN IND PK/ ROWLAND ROAD SERVICE-SWIMMING AID REPAIR EQUIPMENT-LIQUOR STORE PORTABLE RESTROOMS-PARKS DEPT OCTOBER EXPENSES WRENCHES-EQUIP MAINT EMPLOYMENT AO-COMMUNITY CENTER 407.75 6441.92 15.75 68.54 215.46 60.00 52.39 198.00 77.72 130.00 329.42 38288.25 243.50 3391.99 331.80 40.00 1457.40 140.00 54.60 35.75 36.25 7.19 82.61 383.52 666.74 30914.55 3338.00 5.13 1119.66 19.00 12.20 219.92 55.00 25.00 50.00 71.25 75.00 150.00 18.50 104.25 75.00 715.75 53.50 137.50 94.40 15.75 16989.00 9.00 18.84 53.57 185.10 28.10 30.00 10773952 16299 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC 16300 DAVID STUTELBERG 16301 TARGET STORES INC 163M TRI-STATE TREE SERVICE INC 163 TWIN CITY PRICING & LABEL INC 16304 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC 16305 KEITH WALL 16306 REBECCA WARNER 16307 WATER PRODUCTS CO 16308 WEED KING 16309 XEROX CORP 16310 ZEP MANUFACTURING CO 593807 LEGAL ADS SOFTBALL OFFICAL/FEES PO PICTURE FRAMES-CITY COUNCIL TREES-FORESTRY DEPT LABELS-LIQUOR STORE NUTS & BOLTS EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT MILEAGE-ELECTION RISER/GASKET/SOLDER SWIVEL/PIPE -WATER DEPT WEED CUTTING SERVICE CHEMICALS-EQUIP MAINT 863.01 318.50 10.48 937.50 71.69 254.91 7.00 30.50 1160.21 656.00 1426.02 202.25 $315114.48 .22.211 OCTOBER 2, 1984 CASH DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND NUMBER 10 GENERAL 15 L/S PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL 17 LIZ PRESERVE 30 CASH PARK FEES 31 PARK ACOUIST 6 DEVELOP 33 UTILITY BOND FUND 51 1MPROV CONST FUND 73 WATER FUND 77 SEWER FUND 81 TRUST 8 ESCROW FUND 90 TAX INCREMENT CONST FUND 1315114.48 126473.33 32395.98 23958.53 1485.63 4795.49 3338.00 28027.80 21145.72 38887.39 4956.00 29650.61 2.2-2-S TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John D. Frane, Finance Director DATE: September 27, 1984 RE: M.I.D.B.'s for McGlynn Bakeries - $400,000- Resolution No. 84-267 McGlynn received approval for $1,650,000 in bonds in May of 1984; these bonds are not part of the "cap". They are requesting an additional $400,00 to complete the project. For technical reasons we are being asked to allocate $400,000 of the $1,650,000 to equip- ment and the new $400,000 to construction. A public hearing cannot be held until November; if the Council authorizes this transaction McGlynn will give the City $4,000 to preserve its allocation. Resolution No. 84-267 is enclosed for your consideration. The owner's equity is expected to be $500,000. JDF:bw 9/27/84 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA Application for Industrial Development Bond Project Financing. 1. APPLICANT: Burton J. McGlynn a. Business Name - McGlynn Bakeries, Inc. (Lessee) b. Business Address -7752 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 c. Business Form (corporation, partnership, sole proprietor- .ship, etc.) - corporation d. State of Incorporation or organization - Minnesota e. Authorized Representative - Burton J. McGlynn - Chairman Michael J. McGlynn- President f. Phone - 937-9404 2. NAME(S) AND ADDRESSES OF MAJOR STOCKHOLDERS OR PRINCIPALS: a. Burton J. McGlynn 6820 Cheyenne Circle Edina, Minnesota 55435 b. Patricia McGlynn Elm Cheyenne Circle Edina,. Minnesota 55435 C. Michael McGlynn ' 5024 Bruce Place Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1- 222.7 3. GIVE BRIEF DLSCRIPTION OF NATURE O F PRODUCTS, ETC: McGlynn Bakeries, Inc. is baked foods primarily for sale at through approximately 100locations in a number of baking facilities. BUSINESS, PRINCIPAL engaged in the production of retail. The products are sold five states and are produced 4. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Acquisition, construction and equip p i n g o f a 3 2 , 0 0 0 s q u a r e foot addition to an existing facility at 7 7 5 2 M i t c h e l l R o a d , t o b e o w n e d b y McGlynn Bakeries, Inc. or owned by B u r t o n J . M c G l y n n a n d l e a s e d t o McGlynn Bakeries, Inc., for use as a w a r e h o u s e a n d m a n u f a c t u r i n g facility. a. Location and intended use: 7752 Mi t c h e l l R o a d Eden Prairie The new facilities will enhance pro d u c t i o n . b. Present ownership of project site: Owned by Burton J. McGlynn, leased t o M c G l y n n Bakeries, Inc. c. Names and address of architect, engi n e e r , a n d general contractor: C. F. Haglin an d S o n , I n c . 4005 West 65th Street Edina, Minnesota 55435 S. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST FOR: Land Construction Contracts Equipment Acquisition and installa t i o n * Architectural and Engineering Legal Interest during Construction Bond Reserve Contingencies Loan Fees -- Other • Total $ 210,000 1.400.000 400,0m 28,000 12,000 -0- -0- ;70'; $ 2,050.000 *Heating and air conditioning sho u l d b e i n c l u d e d a s b u i l d i n g c o s t s . --Indicate the kind of equipment to b e a c q u i r e d h e r e . 2 2 2-7 6. BOND ISSUE - a. Amount of proposed bond issue - $2,050,000 b. Proposed date of sale of bond - November 1, 1984 c. Length of bond issue and proposed maturities -15 years d. Proposed original purchaser of bonds First Southdale National Bank of Edina . 7001 France Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55435 e. Name and address of suggested trustee . . None I. Copy of any agreement between Applicant and original purchaser - None . Describe any interim financing sought or available - The Company sought conventional financing, but that was not available at a fixed rate over the proposed term. h. Describe nature and amount of any permanent financing in addition to bond financing - None 7. BUSINESS PROFILE - a. Are you located in the City of Eden Prairie? Yes -sf employees in Zdnn Prairie? i. Before this project: 125 g. -3- . ' * ii. After this project? 145 c. Approximate annual sales - 6.. 22 million d. Length of time in business Since 1962 in Eden Prairie _9 years e. Do you have plants in other locations? If so, where? 13 bakeries at various locations in Minnesota, Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri and Wisconsin. f. Are you engaged in international trade? No 8. OTHER INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT(S): a. List the name(s) and location(s)of other industrial development project(s) in which the Applicant is the owner or a "substantial user" of the facilities or a • "releated person" within the meaning of Section 103(b)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code. 61,300,000 City of Eden Prairie Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (McGlynn Bakeries, Ine. Project) Series 1980 the proceeds of which were used to finance the warehouse, manufacturing and office facility at 7752 Mitchell Road. $900,000 City of Eden Prairie Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (McGlynn Bakeries, Incorporated Project), Series 1983, the proceeds of which were used to construct additions and improvements to the facility at 7752 Mitchell Road, and to acquire and install certain equipment. -9- 2 .210 b. List all cities in which the Applicant has r e q u e s t e d industrial revenue development financing. None • c. Detail the status of any request the Appli c a n t h a s b e f o r e any other city for industrial development r e v e n u e f i n a n c i n g . None d. List any city in which the Applicant has bee n r e f u s e d industrial development revenue financing. None e. List any city (and the project name) where t h e A p p l i c a n t has acquired preliminary approval to proce e d b u t n w h i c h final approval authorizing the financing ha s b e e n d e n i e d . None f. If Applicant has been denied industrial developm e n t revenue financing in any other city as ident i f i e d in (d) or (e), specify the reason(s) for the den i a l and the name(s) of appropriate city officials wh o have knowledge of the transaction. Not Applicable 9. NAMES AND ADDRESS OF: a. Underwriter (If public offering) b. Private Placement Purchaser (If private plac e m e n t ) First Southdale National Bank of Edina 7001 France Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55435 i. If lender will not commit until City has passed its preliminary resolution approving the project, submit a letter from proposed ' lender that it has an interest in the offering subject to appropriate City approval and approval of the Commissioner of Securities. By )-.2 b. Bond Counsel - paegre 6 Benson 2300 Multifoods Tower Minneapolis, MN 55402 (Stephen Rosholt) c. Corporate Counsel - Evidon & Weisberg, P.A. Parkdale 4, Suite 110 5353 Gamble Dr. St. Louis Park, MN 55416 (Burton G. Weisberg) Arthur Andersen & Co. . Midwest Plaza Building Minneapolis, MN 55402 .10. WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR: a. Construction start - November 1, 1984 b. Construction completion - November 1, 1985 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Burton J. McGIvnn or Michael J. McGlynn, McGlynn Bakeries, Inc., 7752 Mitchell Road (937-9404) The undersigned Applicant understands that the approval or disapproval by the City of Eden Prairie for Industrial * Development bond financing does not expressly or impliedly constitute any-approval, variance, or waiver of any provision or requirement relating to any zoning, building, or other rule• or ordinance of the City of Eden Prairie, or any other law applicable to the property included in this project. MCGLYNN BAKERIES, INC . Applicant d. Accountant - Date 774?./LeZ -7- 22- d. Variances required - 11. ZONING - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTHENT a. Property is zoned - b. Present zoning (is) (is not) correct for the intended use. c. Zoning application received on for which is correct for the intended use. City Planner -8- RESOLUTION ALLOCATING BOND ISSUANCE AUTHORITY TO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY MCGLYNN BAKERIES, INC. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 84-120, adopted May 15, 1984, this Council gave preliminary approval to a project ("the Project") to be undertaken by Burton J. McGlynn and leased to McGlynn Bakeries, Inc. (the "Company"), and the financing thereof with industrial development revenue bonds of the City in an amount up to approximately $1,650,000; and WHEREAS, the Company has advised this Council that it desires to increase the amount of industrial development revenue bonds to be issued for the Project to $2,050,000, and to make certain other changes in the Project and the financing plan; and WHEREAS, the additional $400,000 of bonds proposed to be issued would be subject to the volume limitations of the Tax Reform Act of 1984 and the provisions of 1984 Minnesota Laws, Chapter 582; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the said Chapter 582, the City has reserved its 1984 entitlement issuance authority with the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development and has submitted an application deposit to the Department in the amount of one percent of the reserved issuance authority; and WHEREAS, the last day on which the City may return unused issuance authority to the Department and receive a full refund of its application deposit is October 31, 1984; and WHEREAS, the Company has requested that the City allocate $400,000 of its reserved 1984 entitlement issuance authority to bonds to finance the Project and has submitted an application deposit in the amount of $4,000 to the City, re- presenting one percent of the $400,000 of issuance authority requested by the Company to be allocated to Bonds for the - Project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. $400,000 of the City's reserved 1984 entitlement issuance authority under 1984 Minnesota Laws, Chapter 582, is hereby allocated to bonds to be issued to finance the Project. 2. If bonds are issued for the Project in 1984, the City shall return the Company's $4,000 application deposit to the 2 Company, promptly upon return of $4,000 of the City's application deposit from the Department of Energy and Economic Development. 3. If bonds are not issued for the Project in 1984, the City shall be obligated to return to the Company only so much of its $4,000 application deposit, if any, as the City may receive from the Department of Energy and Economic Development upon return of the $400,000 of issuance authority allocated hereby to the Department for reallocation. Bluffs West 4th CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 117-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the R1-13.5 District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the R1-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph 8, shall be, and are amended accordingly. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions And Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 7th day of August, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 2nd day of October, 1984. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of 22 7 Exhibit A BLUFFS WEST 4TH ADDITION LEGAL DESCRIPTION Outlot H, Bluffs West, Hennepin County 2.2_91 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-211 A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF COUNCIL APPROVAL OF BLUFFS WEST 4TH ADDITION FOR THE BLUFFS COMPANY FOR SIX SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON TWO ACRES BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal for a Bluffs West 4th Addition by t h e B l u f f s Company for six single family lots on approximately two acres, loca t e d i n t h e northeast quadrant of Riverview Road and Homeward Hills Road, is herei n a p p r o v e d subject to the following specific conditions: 1. The development plan, preliminary plat, and erosion control and gradi n g plan, all dated June 25, 1984, and attached hereto shall apply. 2. Prior to release of the final plat by the City, developer/owner shall: A. Submit detailed erosion control and storm water run-off plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed erosion control, storm water run-off plans, and utility plans for review by the City Engineer. C. Revise the grading plan to direct storm water run-off to the north along Homeward Hills Road. 3. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property, developer/own e r shall pay the required Cash Park Fee. ADOPTED by the City Council on October 2nd, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE VARIANCE 0 84-45 RE: Petition of' ADDRESS: 'VARIANCE REQUEST: BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS 1 FINAL ORDER Hans Hagen Homes 11026 .8 11061 Hyland Court A variance from City Code, Chapter 11, Section. 11.03, Subd. 2 B, to permit construction of a garage 15' from the front yard setback. (Code requires 30') The Board of Appeals and Adjustments for the City of Eden Prairie at a regular (special) meeting thereof duly considered the above petition and after hearing and examining all of the evidence presented and the file ' therein does hereby find and order as follows: 1. All procedural requirements necessary for the review of said variance have been met. (YES x NO )• 2. There are circumstances unique to the property under consideration, and granting such variance does not violate the spirit and intent of the City's Zoning and platting Code. 3. Variance Request # 440 herein Granted x 4. Conditions to the granting x , Denial . of said variance are as follows: 1) Lot #33 will have a 15' front yard setback frpm garage_mtly 2) Lot #2 will have a 15' front yard tagn_garagejuily________ 5. This variance shall be revoked within 15 days after notice of failure to meet the required conditions has been given. 6. A copy of this order shall be forwarded to the applicant by the City Clerk. 7. This order shall be effective 9-13-84 ; however, this variance shall lapse and be of no effect unless the erection or alterations permitted shall occur within one (1) year of the effective date unless said period of time is extended pursuant to the appropriate procedures prior to the expiration of one year from the effective date hereof. 8. All Board of Adjustments and Appeals actions are subject to City Council review. BOARD OF APPEALS AND AhlUS -11ENTS BY: IDATEU: ?" /3 -51 , Denied CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE VARIANCE REQUEST Variance No. 84 -15 DATE: 7/26/84 APPLICANT'S NAME Hans Hagen Homes. Inc. ADDRESS: 2353 No. Rite St., St. Paul PHONES: Work 483-0801 Home 439-4765 FEE: $50.00 receipt # zip c5111 REQUEST FOR VARIANCE AT: Address: 11020 and 11061 Hvland Court Legal: Lot 2 & Lot 33 Block 1, Northmark 4th Addition REASON FOR VARIANCE: To permit construction of 2 car qarage rather than one car garage. ATTACH THE FOLLOWING 1. 8%x11"survey showing lot lines and setbacks of existing and proposed structures and location of buildings on adjoining properties. Also show pertinent topographical features such as trees, fences, berms, steep slopes, ponds, roads, and existing and proposed elevations. 2. Letter addressed to the Board of Appeals and Adjustments explaining nature of variance request and reason(s) why conformance to the literal pro- visions of the City's Code would cause hardship. Applicant's Signature Fee:Owner's Signature / \ Notes to 2pplicant: / -Applications must be filed no later than the 2nd Thursday of the Month previous to the meeting The Board meets on the 2nd Thursday of the Month, 7:30 PM, City Hall,P950 Eden Prairie Road -Notices are publish2d in the Eden Prairie News and mailed to property owners within 500 feet. Applicants are encouraged to personally contact adjacent property-owners prior to the hearing in order to e).plain the variance and to be prepared iWtIC Ai thr hiPdring. •1 • • • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING VARIANCE REQUEST _84-45 TO WHOM 11 FAY CONCERN: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMEN T S NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that th e B o a r d o f A p p e a l s a n d A d j u s t m e n t s will meet at the following time a n d p l a c e : • 7:30 P.M. Thursday, Sept. 13 19 84 At the Eden Prairie Administratio n B l d g . , S c h o o l B d . R m . 9100 School Rd., 55344 to review and consider the var i a n c e r e q u e s t p84-45 , submitted by Hans Hagen Homes for property located at11020 841061 _ _ Hyland Court, legally cteS.Zi.b.ed...as__Lat-2-4--Lot--33,81 o c k - - 1 - , - N o r - t h m a r k - ltli Addiffbil. The request is for a variance from C i t y _ c g c l e i _ C h a p t e r _ 1 1 , _ S e c t i o n - - 1 1 , 4 3 r - Subd. 2 8, to permit construction of a garage 15' from_tbe_.frzni-yard setback. (Code requires 30'). Written or oral comments relati n g t o t h i s v a r i a n c e r e q u e s t w i l l b e h e a r d at this, meeting. Said variance a p p l i c a t i o n i s o n f i l e f o r p u b l i c r e v i e w at the Planning Department at E d e n P r a i r i e C i t y H a l l . PUBLISH: August 29 ,j984 City of Eden Prairie PLANING DEPARTMENT "2.2a 2- Since ely, HOns T. Hagen, Jr. Phesident rckns IEFapa Humes July 26, 1984 Board Of Appeals City of Eden Prairie Eden Prairie, MN 55343 We are requesting the existing sideyard required for 11020 and 11061 Hyland Court be reduced to 15' to permit the construction of 2 car attached garages. The following points may assist you in arriving at a decision. 1. There are no site distance problems that would effect traffic. 2. The distance from the corner of the garage to the street Is a minimum of 24 feet. 3. Only a small corner of the garage falls into that area which requires a waiver from the existing setback requirement. 4. There are no hazards which would effect the safety of residents in the platt or adjacent platts and in fact an additional covered garage permitted by the 15' variance will provide a safer and better looking neighborhood. 5. These townhouses sell for 90,000 to 130,000. In this price bracket all of the buyers need a 2 car garage. Thank you fof—Yia.—eqnsideration. 2353 Rice Street North St. Paul Minnesota 55113 Phone (612) 483-0801 22.0 We Build Drrams. ETSSINE:!3:3 Art, -. . • oreftrOW - — . Lot 1. theteo Have eau hereby d drainage n"") • • / ($(1 4,4 / ,e , In witness le Inc., a Minn r/ 4 lf1+V / officers thi . these p c ii 0:14% A / • / / /...,cf0"• STATE OF MINNESOTA te.....V1 • COUNTY OF •", trir 1741 TM forego - - • • :ts 19S by By SY i corporafion. 18 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OP . nTirraiT The forego rustrot 7. -1v) 191 by ' • of The said corporation. / / I hereby certify that I have •utveyed and ; / this plat is a correct representation of sr / hundredths of a foot; that the monuments ha / boundaries are correctly designated on said / • STATE or MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA • '• . -• . . The foregoing surveyors certificate VMS and by Ernest G. Bud, rag land surveyor. --" MINNES:TaA • ;.'" • ,..i)141,9" VIDPIT 'Ruda Mr•n•%fkr‘iTsisiiiionf114:064 ' :•• ?t, .00 ,ro • 4emo 2 September 13, 1984 3) Recommendations Staff would recommend denial of Variance Request #84-44 for the following reasons: • a) Technical information to substantiate an increase in sign height and sign size has not been submitted. b) A hardship has not been demonstrated. t) A total signage plan for Brock Residence Inn has not been J submitted to the Planning Department. . d) The use of two signs which conform with City Code on site is an . alternative not yet explored. .B. Variance Request #84-45, submitted by Hans Hagen Homes for property located at 11020 & 11061 Hyland Court. The request is for a variance from City Code, Chapter 11, Section 11.03, Subd. 2 B, to permit con- - struction of a garage 15' from the front yard setback. Code requires 30'). 1) Background The City Council approved Northmark 4th Addition, July 19, 1983, for 32 townhouse units. At the time, no variances from the Board of Appeals was required due to the fact that all variances were approved under the PUD District Review. Variances approved under the Review • included: minimum lot size, width, and depth requirements and zero side yard setbacks. The Planning Staff Report dated May 6, 1983, indicated that the proposed Northmark 4th Addition offered one or two car garages depending upon a buyers choice. It was indicated that some units would only have a one car garage. 2) Staff Review Northmark 4th is zoned RM-6.5. Under this zoning district one covered parking space and one uncovered parking space is required. The Code also requires a minimum front yard setback on a public street of thirty feet. The Northmark 4th Addition plat does not indicate unit location. However, all units must comply with the City Code before a building . permit issuance. The properties located at 11020 and 11061 Hyland Court do front public streets and are not covered by variances granted under the PUD District Review.. Hans Hagen proposes two car garages at each of those locations, creating a frontyard setback of 15' in each case. This is a 50% variance request. 3 September 13, 1984 3. Recommendation Staff recommends denial of Variance Request #84-45, for the following reasons: a) The original plans submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the City Council, included units with one car attached garages and units with two car attached garages as an option. • b) A 50% variance from Code is requested. c) The proposed units meet City Code with one car attached garages. d) A hardship has not been demonstrated. C. Variance Request #84-46, submitted by Gustafson & Associates for property located at 13801 Cardinal Creek Road. The request is for a variance from City Code, Chapter 11, Section 11.50, Subd. 6, 3, 1, to permit con- struction of a structure from recreational development waters. (Code requires 100') 1) Background The City Council approved Cardinal Creek 3rd Addition June 5, 1982. The approval included platting of 16 acres for 37 duplexes and one triplex zoned RN - 6.5. In May of 1983, Gustafson & Associates applied to rezone Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 17, Block 2 from RM - 6.5 to RI - 13.5. Both of these lots In this subdivision were unbuildable for duplex or triplex lots because of their proximity to Nine Mile Creek and the requirements for a 150 foot setback from the ordinary high water mark of the creek for multiple units. The Shorelard Management portion of the City Code differentiates between attached housing setbacks to the normal ordinary high water mark and detached housing setbacks, to the normal ordinary high water mark. The minimum setback for a single family detached home from Nine Mile Creek is 100 feet. • The City Council approved rezoning of the lots from RM - 6.5 to R1- 13.5 for two single family units. 2) Staff Review It is possible to position the proposed home on the lot to meet min- imum requirements of the City Code. Exhibit B shows the house posi- tioned to meet City Code. MEMORANDUM .J: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: City Manager Carl J. Julli FROM: Assistant to the City Manage Craig W. Dawsone SUBJECT: Recycling Solid Waste DATE: September 27, 1984 Recycling is gaining in popularity and credibility in the Twin Cities area as a way to reduce the amount of solid waste entering the region's sanitary landfills. Organized municipal programs are steadily building in number; in Hennepin County, they are now in place in Minneapolis, St. Louis Park, Hopkins, and Richfield. Recently-enacted legislation allows the State, as well as counties and cities which host landfills, to levy a volumetric landfill tax - in part to provide funds for assistance and development of such low-technology waste abatement alternatives as recycling. With rumors that the Metropolitan Council may disallow any new or expanded mixed municipal solid waste landfills, and that the Legislature may in the mid-term future mandate residential recycling programs in the metropolitan area through the Metropolitan Council, it appears that recycling is a service which cities should consider before they are required to provide it according to models developed by other levels of government. Need for Advisory Committee: While it may be easy to copy one of the existing programs 1 the area, those programs which have been developed were designed to meet conditions desired results specific to the respective cities. Eden Pi'airie also needs to identify its unique conditions and recycling goals. An advisory committee should be formed to develop recommendations to the City Council regarding the type of program, level of service, and goals of recycling in the City. Persons serving on this committee could include City staff; members of the Parks, Recreation A Natural Resources Commission, and Planning Commission; members of the local newspapers; and residents who have indicated to Council members and staff their desire to serve on such a committee. Issues: Several issues need to be examined while formulating a recycling program for Eden Prairie. These issues revolve around the goals of recycling, responsibility for collection and marketing, type and frequency of service, and who bears what cost for the service. Goals of Recycling: The primary goals of recycling are gaining maximum value of resources -(including land), minimizing the threat of pollution by landfill leachate and methane, and reducing overall refuse costs to residents. The first two goals form the premises of nearly every recycling program; however, the one concerning cost-effectiveness has evoked the most discussion. Hennepin County cities have taken several approaches to this item: **Minneapolis tries to make recycling a self-paying proposition. Mixed refuse is collected by private contractors for $22 per ton; recyclables are collected by other contractors for $10.50 to $13.50 per ton with all revenues from the sale of recyclables going to the contractor. In this system, Minneapolis saves $8.50 to $11.50 for each ton of material recycled and passes the savings to residents by reduced needs for property taxes to pay for overall refuse service. **St. Louis Park and Hopkins intend to show significant reductions 2.2471 Mayor and City Council - 2 - September 27, 1984 in volumes collected by their single City-wide contractors such that the rate of increase in the contracts will be reduced beginning in 1986. It is anticipated that the cost of refuse collection plus recycling collection will be no more than what would have been scheduled for refuse collection alone. **Richfield is collecting recyclables so that residents can change their behavior toward recycling. Future costs of landfill disposal will be high; recycling will reduce the waste stream and presumably the cost of refuse service because refuse contractors could factor this volume reduction in Richfield into their bids for service to Richfield customers. Given the multiplicity of refuse haulers serving Eden Prairie residents, it may be difficult to calculate the reduction in landfill-bound solid waste due to recycling and the resultant cost savings. Collection and Marketing: Recycling can be done by the City or by private non-profit and for-profit organizations. Minneapolis, St. Louis Park, and Hopkins have contracted with private for-profit firms to collect and market recyclables. Richfield has designated volunteer organizations and a private non-profit firm for collection and marketing of materials. An advisory committee should recommend the City's role in these areas. Type and Frequency of Service: Recycling collections are accomplished in two ways -- at the residence or at a recycling drop-off center. Minneapolis, St. Louis Park, Hopkins ( I Richfield offer residential service where residents are required to place recyclables 'kit their curb. Successful recycling centers operate in Edina, where the City provides space and modest financial assistance to a stable group of volunteers, and in St. Louis Park, where residents are paid by a private company for materials they bring to a building leased by the City. Residential service is more costly but, by providing greater convenience to the public, has higher rates of participation and amounts of material recycled than most drop-off centers. Frequency of service is another component to be addressed. Residential collections could be monthly, as in St. Louis Park and Hopkins. If recycling centers are used, the number of hours and number of days of operation should be determined. The types of material collected - newsprint, glass, metal cans, waste oil, etc. -- should also be indicated. Cost: Recycling programs are not profitable if one relies solely on the sale of recyclables for revenue. Mills do not make strong demand for recycled material because the supply is not dependable and consumers are perceived to be reluctant to purchase items made from recycled material. Some form of assistance -- generally a fee for collecting recyclables -- is needed to make private organizations viable while serving the public benefits inherent in recycling. Whether this cost should be borne by residents or the City needs to be addressed. It is likely that grants will be available to assist in the implementation of a pilot recycling program. Timeliness: It is desirable that an advisory committee begin meeting in November. This ,e would provide six months for planning and public education if a program were to be implemented in May 1985. Additionally, Hennepin County has nationally-recognized firms under contract through December 1984 for a County recycling study; representatives of these firms are available to meet with the City until that time, according to the contract. z Mayor and City Council - 3 - September 27, 1984 RECOMMENDATION: It is recomaended that the Council appoint an advisory study committee op recycling. This memorandum serves as an outline for the committee's work. CWD/CJJ:jp 22(19