The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council - 07/10/1984 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL . TUESDAY, JULY 10, 1984 7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Paul Redpath and George Tangen COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie; Assistant to the City Manager 9 Craig Dawson; City Attorney Roger Pauly; Finance Director i John Frane; Planning Director Chris Enger; Director of Community Services Robert Lambert; Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael INVDCATION: Councilman Paul Rednath PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE { ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. MINUTES A. Board of Review !aeei.ing eld Tuesday, May 22, 1984 Page 1368 B. ,,ecial_C:.i!;LCouncil meetinL eld Tuesd.�y Mt ay 7.2; 1984 Page 1371 II1. CONSI NT CA:-EN'TIAR A. Clerk's t Tense List Page 1375 B. 20 Readinq of Ordinance #40-84 EDENVALE 13TH ADDITION .'Page 1376 liyi:qui*able Life 7;sstirarice Society of the United States (Lowing District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 for 3.20 acres, and Adoption of Resolution P89-157, Approving Dsvelop:tient Plan Subject to Conditions. Location: Edenvale Boulevr.rl at Birch Island Drive) C. 2nd Rea(- of Ordinance ;I4d--34 MTh;-TEX PH1SE IV Page 1379 T?oniny Am ndrnertf rnr b.3 acre for one industrial lot in I-2 ?arP: zoning District, Approval of Amended Dovelcper' llgr«<Far:lit for biro-Te4 Phase IV, and Adoption of Rw ol,.t.iora Appriv"Ing Sa:een�ry of Ordinance #44-L.' and Orir-ri;-o the Publication of said Surroary of Mi -Tcy r2hr.se IV. oce.;:it)n: Saut.!;Uest quadrant of W. 7(;th and `J!.,d,y- Oak Read) Agenda -2- July 10, 1984 to. D. Approval of Master Agreement for Southwest Crossing Page 1398 Overall Development 'E. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 27-80. SOUTHWEST CROSSING Page 1399 jLoning District. Change from Commercial Region- an to _ Office, Approval of Developer's Agreement, and Adoption of Resolution #84-168, Approving Summary of Ordinance 827-84 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary) F.. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 36-84-PUD-6-841 Page 1400 OUTIi6i`ST CRDS�IdG II. {Zoning District Change from Rural to I-7 Park for Office/Industrial Use; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Southwest Crossing II, and Adoption of Resolution #34-174, Approving Summary of Ordinance 06-84-PUD-6-84 and Ordering Publication of said Sunanary for Southwest Crossing II. Location: Northwest quadrant of County Road M and Highway I-494) r G. Reuest of J. R. Nord, Inc. Page 1401 It, Award Contract for Homeward Hills Park Grading, Page 1403 �ResolutionaF84-155 . I, Set Public Hearing for Vacation of Easements in ha _.Oak.Industrial Park 5th Addition for /:30 m. Au ust ] 1984. Motion Parking Prohibition for P_.roposed Anderson Lakes Pa4e 1405 rar—kw ay, I115AS r-S0-7,Trom MiLctreII Road to 1. H. 1.69 Resolution if3r-154�. `--�-- K. Resolution No. 84-171 Catlin n for a Public Hearing Page 1406 fot floe;ir,t 2e4Fnu- tsoris in the Arnou_nt of 750 U(1(t -0t fur Focn Investi•io_nLt F d e n v a I e - - r IV. PUBLIC Hf-AItIN_GS A. LIM'S TAP--Rrrt Noterwan and Lynn Charlson. Compre- Page 1409 ' h ensivc Guide Plan Amendment frein Low Density I Residential to Commorcial for 1.6 acres; and Preliminary Plat of 24.2 acres into three lots. Location: Northwest quadrant of Highway 1109 and County Road t4. (Resolution !18d-162, Comprehensive Guide Plan Mlendment; 1 Resolution i34-163 Preliminary Plat) B. P(ATr IF i; (hr_, by H t.ia Homes, Inc. Roquest for Page 1419 Pl-,+r- .1 <<nit Dwcicrn ant OiScrict Review and Zoning from n� Rural to R1-M, wit.h variancc,s, for 60 single family rrsidential unit.; and Preliminary Plat. of 24 acres into j 00 lot.:; and n,;tlots. Location: Nurthv:cst quadrant of ) V,,l loy Vita; Rorvt and i 6,jivale Boul•2vard. A publ is iw-i-inq. (ib-dinance ",17-ti44PUD-7-&4, Rezoning; Resolu- tio)i 1''_t;1-1137, Preliminary Plat) Agenda -3- July 10, 1984 i C. ST. ANDREW CHURCH. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Page 1433 Change from Low and Medium Density Residential to Church for 4.95 awes; Zoning District Change from Rural to Public fur 1.2 acres; and Site Plan Amendment for Church expansion for 3.75 acres. Location: Northwest quadrant of Baker Road and Valley View Road. A public hearing. (Board of Appeals action required) (Resolution #84-164, Comprehensive Guide Plan Change; Ordinance #46-84, ) Rezoning) D. KURVERS_ ADDITION, by Franklin J. Kurvers. Request for Page 1441 Zoning bfsfri—Change from Rural to R1-13.5 and Preliminary Plat of 2.0 acres into five single family residential lots. Location: East of Highway #101, j north of Autumn Woods, South of Rymarland Camp. +! (Ordinance #47-84, Rezoning; Resolution #84-165, Preliminary Plat) V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 14416 - 14716 Page 1445 VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS F VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS,_ COM_MIINICATIO_NS_ A. LEE DATA--Request for review of Environmental Assessment Page 1452 WoFk_ f et Finding of No Significant Impact for expansion of Office portion by 72,000 sq. ft. Location: East of Flying Cloud Drive, south of W. 70th Street. (Resolution #84-166, EAW) VIII. REPORIS OF OFFICERS BOARDS, AND COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council PSemhers B. wort of City Mana4er 1. Woodpile Ordinance Page 1476 C. Rt:port of City Attorney r D. Report of director of Public Works - —-- — -- i. Award Contract for Flyin_q Cloud Drive l.f,. �i2-'l�i�l (i�esolutiun IX. X. AOJD!{RFitdc!v`7 33 4 d UNAPPROVED MINUTES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW TUESDAY, MAY 22. 1984 7:00 PM. SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM BOARD OF REVIEW MEMBERS: President of the Board Wolfgang H. Penzel, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Paul Redpath and George Tannen f BOARD OF REVIEW STAFF: City Manaqer Carl J. Jullie, City Assessor Stevo Sinell, Hennepin County Representative Kerman Benson and Recording Secretary Karen Michael PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: all members were present. I. RECONVENE BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING The meeting was called to order by President of the Board of Review Wolfgang H. Penzel. II. APPROVAL. OF BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES OF MEETING HELD TUESDAY, MAY B. 1984 MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Minutes of the t Board of Review Meeting held Tuesday, May 8, 1984, as published,. Motion carried unanimously. 1I1. REVIEW OF ITEMS CONTiNIIFD FROM MAY II, 1984 City Assessor Sinell called attention to the materials which had been sent to Hoard members reviewing the items which were continued from the May 8th meeting. PINTTT T. 11HTO';Ci1 - 9688 Buckingham Orive - 25-116-22-41-0007 , Lehtonen stated he had it third party appraisal made of the property (Miley Appraisals) and the appraiser stated the property had a market value of SIa,000. Sinell noted that Wiley had not used any comparables -a in they immediate neighborhood and the figures used were from the Fall of 1. 1O"�2; he said ho r•anuld have to disagree with the appraisal. Lehtonen � indicated a home across the sl.reet from his is for sale for $$114,000 i and has heen on the market for six months. 4j Fi01"I0N: Redp:rth r;nvod, seconded by Bentley, to accept the recoirmonda ti oil of the Assessor and to sustain the valuation on the Lel-it:onen property. Motion carried unanimously. G, 1 if , Minutes of the Board of Review -2- May 221 1984 6' BERNIE FINK & TONY LESINSKI - 6331 Industrial Drive - 03-116-22-22-0016 MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Tangen, to accept the recommendation of the Assessor and to sustain the valuation on the Fink & Lesinski prop- erty, Motion carried unanimously. MR, AND MRS, DONALD JO_HNSON - 7261 Willow Creek Road + 12.116-22-22-0005 MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to accept the recommendation of the Assessor.and reduce the value of the Johnson property to $121,000. Motion carried unanimously, WILLIAM QUIRK - 14308 Charing Cross - 03-116-22-32-0051 z MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to accept the recommendation of the Assessor and reduce the value of the Quirk property to $102,000. Motion carried unanimously. MICHAEL DAVIS - 17261 Park Circle - OB-116-22-33-0042 MOTION: Bentley moved• seconded by Anderson, to accept the recommendation of the Assessor and reduce the value of the Davis property to $B1,000. Motion carried unanimously. MR. AND MRS, JERRY McKI_NNEY - 9826 Brighton Lane - 25-116-22-11-0129 and MR. AND MRS.DICK LAIRD - 4840 Brighton Lane - 25-116-22-11-0128 MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by 8entley, to accept the recommendation of the Assessor and to sustain the valuation on the McKinney and Laird i properties. Motion carried unanimously, FLOYD AND JANE DAY SIEFFERMAN - 6997 Edgebrook Place - 03-116-22-44-0029 MOTIDN: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to accept the recommendation } of the Assessor and to sustain the valuation on the Siefferman property. Notion carried unanimously, UPPER MIDWEST F"ANAGEMFNT CORP. - 8140 Flying Cloud Drive - 14-116-22-42-OOD2 ' and - 14-116-22-13-0005 { a MOTION: Redpath moved. seconded by Anderson, to accept the recommendation i of the Assessor and to reduce 42-002 to 51D,000 and to reduce 13.0003 to $372,000. Motion carried unanimously. FACTORY OUTLET CENTER - 11-16-22-32-0008 MOTION: a Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to accept the recommendation of the Assessor and to reduce the value of the Factory Outlet Center to 4 $4,700,000. (lotion carried unanimously, { Minutes of the Board of Review -3, May 22, I984 THE BUSSE COMPANY - 6300 Carlson Drive - 03-116-22-21-0007 MOTION: Anderson moved seconded by Bentley, to accept the recommendation of the Assessor and to sustain the valuation on the Busse Company property. Motion carried unanimously. 01-116.22_14-0006 01-116-1.2-43-0008 12-116-22-14_0015. 12-116-22-14-0017 12-116-22-14-0018 a 13-116-22-32-0003 01-I16-22-34-6011 City Assessor Sinell referred to a letter dated May 15, 1984, from the City Attorney regarding whether or not a written communication constitutes an appearance before the local Board of Review; the City Attorney's opinion was that the letter was sufficient for the property owner to preserve his right to appear before the County Board of Equalization, Hennepin County representative Benson said the County Attorney's opinion was that it did not constitute an appeal, Tangen said the City should go along with the ruling of the City Attorney, MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to accept the recommendation of the Assessor and to sustain the valuations of the properties with the following PIN numbers: 01-116-22-14-0006, 01-116-22-43-0008, 12-116-22-144015, 12-116-22-14-0017. 12-116-22-14-0018, 13-116-22-32-0003, and 01-116-22-34-001' Motion carried unanimously. CECIL MARTIN - 6585 Eden Prairie Road - 04-116.22-23.0050 Martin indicated his valuation had been raised approximately 10% this past t year while his neighbors had been raised about 2`6. City Assessor Sinell noted the valuation in 1983 was $61,100; for 1984 it was $66,500. Sinell said the appraisal of this property had been done on a cost approach less depreciation. s MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to reduce the value of the s' Martin property to $62,800. Motion carried unanimously. Michael Davis and Mr. and Mrs Floyd Siefferman arrived after action had been on their properties. Both indicated they will consider their rights to appeal to the County. IV. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO 84-122ACCEPTING THE 1984 ASSESSMENT }}' MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to adopt Resolution No. 84-122, i accepting the 1984 assessment. Motion carried unanimously, V. ADJOURMIK INT MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to adjourn the reconvened meeting of the Roard of Revifrw at 7:43 p.m, Motion carried unanimously. M' UNAPPROVED MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING f EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 22, 1984 7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM j COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, Richard Anderson, Georg- , Bentley, Paul Redpath and George Tangen CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the j City Manager Craig W. Dawson, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, City Attorney Rick Rosow, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael ROLL CALL: all members were present, I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following item was added to the Agenda: II. C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 24-84, Wilson 3Udge. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Agenda and Other Items of Business as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. E II, CONSENT CALENDAR A, 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 45-84, an Ordinance amending Chapter 5, Section 5.40,_rrovidingfor a w,;iver of the bondi ng requirement of Ordinance No. 1-83=tlf gamFilinq ordinaneeTupon a 4 5 vote o_f tFe Council, B. EDEN GLEN CENTER, 2nd Reading of Ordinance No, 34-84, Zoning District Change from Rural to Commercial Regional Service. and adoption of Resolu- A tion No, 84-127. Approving Development Plan Subject to Conditions, 1.633 acres for 11,000 sq, ft. strip shopping center. Location: east side of Glen Lane between Singletree Lane and Eden Road. C. WILSON RIDGE,' 2nd Reading of Ordinance No, 24-84, Zoning District Change i froiii Coow(rcial Regional to Office for 18.64 acres, and from Coinmercial Regional to I-2 Park, with variances, for 5,42 acres, for Wilson Ridge, Approval of Developer's Agreement. for Wilson Ridge, and Adoption of Resolu- tion No. 84-82, Approving Summary of Ordinance No. 24-84, and Ordering Publication of Said Summary of Wilson Ridge. 60.85 acres for three lots and four outluts. Location: north of Valley View Road and east of High- way 169. 0. Special City Council Meeting .2- May 22, 1984 City Manager Jullie noted that Ordinance No. 24-84 relating to the Wilson Ridge proposal would not be published without the consent of the two parties involved or July 15. 1984 -- whichever occurs first. Bentley asked why this provision would be included. Dennis Doyle, spokesman for Welsh Companies, said this is proposed because it has been very hard to get the Meat Cutters' representatives to agree to anything. Jullie said as of July 15th it would be the City's option to finalize the action to rezone the property back to Rural. City Attorney Rosow said he did not think the City had a legal basis not to publish the Ordinance. Bentley indicated he did not see what the problem was since this was being done to accommodate the Meat Cutters. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve items A - C on the Consent Calendar with item C not to be published until July 15, 1984, unless agreed to by the two parties involved or at the City's. discretion. Motion carried unanimously. III. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 1984 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING Director of Public Works Dietz said this represents a change in the method of handling assessment projects. Tonight the Council will be looking at the summary of what is being assessed. The Council reviewed the improvement projects on an individual basis. Penzel said he felt it was unfair that the Uherkas would have to be assessed for improvements which were being done to accommodate the Amoco site. { Dietz further explained the situation. Len Uherka stated he felt this would help their site and he indicated they had received an estimate as i to the cost before the project was begun and there had been no surprises. Tangen asked why there was an interest rate of 8% on the trunk sewer and water assessment against parcel number 14-116-22-24-0001 rather than 11% as the rate for the rest of the projects. Dietz said this was an error t and would he corrected. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to close the Public Hearing, j Motion carried unanimously, g IV. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS s A. Reports of Council Members i Bentley - stated he had met with Commissioner Braun (Mn/DOT) on Monday morning regardinq the inst-allation of signals at Prairie Center Drive and TH 169. This meeting also included John Teman, Discussion was on how to fund the installation, Braun did not have any new suggestions; however, the State might be willing to go 50/50 with the City on the in,t:allation. Braun felt it was something vihich is necessary, Bentley Special City Council Meeting -3- May 22, 1984 said they also discussed TH 212 with Braun; there was talk of the City beconing financially involved in the building of TH 212. He said it was something to think about. Bentley suggested City Manager Jullie talk with people at the highway department about this. Redpath said after the City's experience with the ring road projects, he did not feel the City should be involved in much more road building. He said he felt State agencies had let the City down over the years. Bentley said it might be done on concurrence with other communities. Penzel - called attention to a letter of May 14, 1984, from the Sterling 1ilTASSOCiation in which it gives Sterling Field to the City -- it is unclear if this is for operation of Sterling Field or if the City is being given the actual property. The matter was referred to Staff for clarification. - called attention to a communication from W. Gordon Smith Co. regarding the Car Care Center which is now before the Board of Appeals for a variance request. Redpath said he felt that the W. Gordon Smith Co. should ask for a change if it so desires and feels a change is necessary. - requested comments on the draft ETS on the landfill. Redpath said he is opposed to the landfill. He said he felt the Staff paper did a very good job of defending the City's position. Redpath noted that the City, as a City, cannot stop the expansion; it can only deny rezoning. He suggested the City adopt requlations which would cover landfills. Bentley said he felt it was unconscionable to consider the expansion as different from a new landfill. Penzel said regulations might include operating hours, contributions towards maintenance of roadways, etc. Penzel said he would like to have Staff provide the Council with the pros and cons of such regulations. Anderson said he woul; like to find out what type of regu- lations the City can put on landfill-, -- what can be legally done -- all possibilities should he investigated. Jullie said these must be consistent with State regulations; recent legislation authorized Cities 15d per ton which can he levied. City Attorney Rosow said that under the general powers of municipalities, the City has the authority to regulate the disposal of garbage. These regulations would have to be consistent with those of the Metropolitan Council and the PCA, lie said how these are e applied is another thing. Anderson said he would suggest Staff and the City Attorney sit down to discuss this and then come back to the Council with their recommendation. Rosow said the City Attorney's office has diSCUSSed the matter with the attorneys who negotiated for the City of Medina; these concerns were reflected in the draft ordinance. Bentley suggested this County or the State guarantee all long term costs resulting from prohlems with landfills. Jullie expressed concern about how the agencies are going to assure the homeowners in the area that they will not suffer an economic loss. Anderson asked if it was reasonable for ! the City to lower the taxes in the area. Penzel said that question should be raised. - asked the City Council to look at various formats for review of the City Manager for discu,sion at a later date. i l Special City Council Meeting -4- May 22, 1984 B. Report of City Manager 1. Authorization to purchase City radios (continued from May 15,•1984) City Manager Jullie indicated the bid received by the City was for $1437 vs. $861 which had been received by the City of Minnetonka and is open to the City of Eden Prairie. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to accept the City Manager's recommendation to purchase 12 radios at a cost of $861/unit with funds to come from the General Fund surplus. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Redpath. Tangen and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. V. NEW BUSINESS Bentley indicated the condition of Preserve Boulevard is less than passable. Director of Public Works Dietz said the Street Department will get to that as soon as possible. City Manager Jullie said he had been at a meeting this afternoon where the people from cable tv made a presentation in which they stated they will be j coming before the City to request a change in the franchise agreement. f They will ask to be able to reduce their local programming effort: and they 1 would like a cash contribution of $300,000 - $600,000 per year over the next i five years. a VI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to adjourn the meeting at 8:55 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. i ` CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST July 10, 1984 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & C014M ) GAS FITTER Elder-Jones, Inc. Nordic Services CONTRAC70R_(_1 & 2 FAMILY) PLUMBING Associated Properties & Investments Clark Plumbing B & B Construction C. Fadden & Sons Mark Charles Corcoran Plumbing Countryside Four, Inc. Murr Plumbing - Apple Valley Creative Shelters, Inc. Nordic Services Hamer/Leaf Construction Thoen Plumbing Florian M. Kauth Widmer Brothers, Inc. Herb Knutson Construction r Landscape Creations Narr Construction, Inc. Jerome D. Triplett. Contractor J. T. Kirby & Sons HEATING & VENTILATING Merit Heating & Ventilating, Inc. Nordic Services These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licirnsed activity. Pat Sol ie, Lirensirig CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-157 A RESDLUTION SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF COUNCIL APPROVAL OF EDENVALE 18Tli ADDITION FOR EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES FOR 10 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 3.20 ACRES BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal for Edenvale 18th Addition by Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States for 10 single family lots on approximately 3.20 acres, located at the northwest corner of Birch Island Road. and Edenvale Boulevard, is herein approved subject to the following specific conditions: 1. The development plan, preliminary plat, and erosion control and grading plan, all dated May 3, 1984, and attached hereto shall apply. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, developer/owner shall: A. Receive approval from the Purgatory Creek Watershed District for drainage, storm water run-off and erosion control plans. B. Submit detailed grading, drainage, erosion control, storm water run- off, sewer and water plans for review by the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's approval thereof. C. Submit to the Director of Planning and receive the Director's approval of an overall development plan keyed with the elevations of each proposed unit type, such that no two substantially similar units are located side by side, directly across, or diagonally across from each other. ADOPTED by the City Council on 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: Tm D. I rarie, City Clerk Exhibit A Legal Description Outlet A, Edenvale 8th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 4 Edenvale 18th Addition a CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA r ORDINANCE NO. 40-84 ' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, A14ONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made ' a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and shall be placed in the.RI-9.5 District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the R1-9.5 District and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph 8, shall be, and are amended accordingly: Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 5th day of June, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published dt a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 10th day of July, 1984. ATTEST: John U. Frane, City Cl'er1; Wolfgang I . nze Mayor PUGLISIIED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of 1984. 1 �-i �b A Min-Tex Phase IV CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 44-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING ORDINANCE #79-37 AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance a (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That Ordinance #79-37 be amended by adding the following: "Section 2. That the above described property shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Developer's Agreement dated ? December 18, 1979, between Richard W. Anderson, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, 'and that certain { supplement to the Developer's Agreement, dated July 10, 1984, . . . "Section 3. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 5th day of June, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 1Dth day of July, 1984. ATTEST: To Fin D. Frane, Cify Clerk Wolfgang H. eniel, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Lden Prairie News on the day of �•. i�1 Exhibit A Legal Description Lot 1, Block 2, LeParc, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Min-Tex Phase IV DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT This Supplement to Developer's Agreement made and entered into as of this day of 1984, by and between MinTex, a Texas General Partnership, transferees of the property as described in the developer's agreement between Richard W. Anderson, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, for Shady Oak Industrial Park 5th Addition, dated December 18, 1979, and the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City•" WHEREAS, Richard W. Anderson, Inc., and City made and entered into a Developer's Agreement, dated December 18, 1979, for Shady Oak Industrial Park 5th Addition (the "Developer's Agreement") and Min-Tex has succeeded to all of the rights and interests in the lands included within Shady Oak Industrial Park 5th Addition, previously owned by Richard W. Anderson, Inc.; and, WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend said agreement for a portion of the property referred to in said agreement, that portion of the property being as described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof; NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties thereto as follows: i 1. The Developer's Agreement shall be and hereby is supplemented and amended in the following respects: A. Paragraph 1. shall be amended to read as follows: Owner shall develop the property in conformance with the revised material dated June_1, 1984, reviewed and approved as amended by the ) City Council on June :, -1ilt1A, and attached hereto as Exhibit 8, subject to such ciiancjes and modifications as provided herein. i B. Paragraph 5. shall be amended to read as follows: Owner shall provide ail necessary utility easements as required by the City Engineer. C. There shall be added paragraphs 7. - 9. as follows: 7. Mechanical equipment outside of the building shall be screened according to Code requirements in an archi- tecturally integral manner. Screening material shall be subject to approval by the Director of Planning, prior to building permit issuance. g, Prior to issuance of any building permit on the property, Owner shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's approval of the following: a. Grading and drainage plans. b. Slope stabilization, sewer, and water plans. 9. Prior to issuance of any building permit on the property, Owner shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of: a. Detailed landscaping plan identifying plant material j by type, quantity, size, and method of installation. i ( The plan shall include, but not be limited to, increased plant materials for screening of the parking and loading areas from W. 70th Street. b. Lighting and signage plans. Z. Min-Tex agrees to all of the terms and conditions and accepts the obligations of the "Owner" under the Developer's Agreement, as amended and supplemented herein. Min-Tex Phase IV CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-160 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUI111ARY OF ORDIMWtCE 44-84 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY 4 WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 44-84 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of 1934; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the sumnary of Ordinance No. 44-84, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. 8. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D, That Ordinance No. 44-34 shall be recorded in the ordinance'book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on _ _> 1984. Wolfgang H.fenzel, � ATTEST. John. D. Franc, City Clerk The following is the full text of the City of Eden Prairie Ordinance No. 44-84, which was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on July 11, 1984. Following the text of the Ordinance, the Supplement to the Developer's Agreement, which is incorporated therein, is summarized. Min-Tex Phase IV CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 44-84 g AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING ORDINANCE #79-37 AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER I AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance t (hereinafter, the °land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. • `i Section 2. That Ordinance #79-37 be amended by adding the following: "Section 2. That the above described property shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Developer's Agreement dated December 18, 1979, between Richard W. Anderson, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, 'and that certain f supplement'to the Developer's Agreement, dated July 10, 1984, .' "Section 3. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the Sth day of June, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the loth day of July, 1984. ATTEST: Sohn D. Frame, City Gierk k'o!fgang_1T._Feenie1, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the _� day of Summary of Developer's Agreement: Min-Tex Phase IV Developer will develop the land as described in Exhibit A which is attached to and incorporated in the Developer's Agreement. In addition, the Developer's Agreement provides for: 1. Submission of plans regarding sewer, water, and drainage to Engineering Department. 2. Submission to the City Engineer of a development Plan for the land. 3. Submission to Watershed District of storm sewer construction plans. Developer to follow the rules and regulations of said Watershed District. i 4. Developer's warranty of title to the land. 5. Construction and maintenance of public improvements which are to be conveyed to the City as well as preservation and restoration of areas surrounding said improvements. Submission of a bond or letter of credit to ensure the quality of said construction, maintenance, preservation, and restoration. 6. Rough grading to be performed by the Developer for improvements which the City will construct pursuant to 100% petition of all owners of the land. Submission of a bond or letter of credit for the rough grading. 1. Payment of first three (3) years' street lighting, engineering review, and street signs costs. B. Developer's commitment not to oppose rezoning if Developer fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months. g. Application of the Developer's Agreement to transferees of the land. 10. City's remedies in the event that Developer violates the provisions of the Developer's Agreement. 11. Notice to the City's cable franchise. 12. Mechanical equipment to be screened. 13. Submit grading, drainage, slope stabilization, sewer, and water plans to City Engineer and receive City Engineer's approval. 14. Submit a detailed landscaping plan screening parking and loading areas from W. 70th Street, and indicating type, size, quantity, and method of installation of materials to the Director of Planning and receive Director's approval. 15. Agree to all the terms and conditions and accept' the obligations of "Dwner" under the Developer's Agreement. for Shady Oak Industrial Park 5th Addition, as amended and supplemented. X N01ICF: A printed ropy of this ordinance is available for inspection by any person i 3 f during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk. AOOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 10, 1984. ohn D. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor i MASTER DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into as of July _, 1984, by and between SOUTHWEST CROSSING JOINT VENTURE, a partnership consisting of Condon Naegele, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and Vantage Properties, fnc., a Texas corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer" and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City". RECITALS A. Developer is the beneficial owner of ancj desires to develop over a substantial number of years an approximately - 106-acre tract of land located in the City of Eden Prairie along Interstate Highway 494, bounded on the west by U.S. Highway 169 and on the east by the Minnesota Vikings' Office and Training Facility. This tract of land, more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof shall herein- after be referred to as the "Property". B. Condon-Naegele Realty Company, a Minnesota partnership, a predecessor in title to Developer, and the City entered into a Re-Zoning Agreement on July 27, 1976 ("1976 Re-Zoning Agree- ment"), relating to the rezoning of approximately 66 acres of the Property and the establishment of a Planned Unit Development .Concept in connection therewith. The 66 acre tract of land referred to in the 1976 Re-Zoning Agreement is described on J 7. � F { t a' Exhibit S attached hereto and made a part hereof and shall, in this Master Developer's Agreement, be referred to as the "Westerly PUD." C. Condon-Naegele Realty Company and the City entered into a Developer's Agreement dated as of August 17, 1982 (the 01982 Agreement"), relating to Planned Unit Development Concept t approval by the City of approximately 53 acres of the Property. This 53 acre tract of land referred to in the 1982 Agreement j is described on Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part hereof and, except as provided in RECITAL D below, shall, in this Master Developer's Agreement, be referred to as the "Easterly PUD." D. A portion of the 53 acre tract of land referred to in the 1982 Agreement i.e. Lot 3, Block 1, Golden Strip, is also included within the land described in the 1976 Re-Zoning v Agreement. For purposes of this Master Developer's Agreement, 'J g such land shall be deemed a part of the Westerly PUD. E. It is the intention of the parties to incorporate in f this Master Developer's Agreement certain covenants, provisions and agreements which are contained in the 1976 Re-Zoning Agree- ment and the 1982 Agreement and relevant to the development 1 x of the Property. F. The City and the Developer have contemporaneously here- with entered into a Developer's Agreement relating to an approxi- mately 8.17 acre parcel of land in the Westerly PUD. The City -2- 3 and the Developer also intend to enter ointo office/showroom/tech Developer's Agreement covering a proposed of land in the Easterly PUD building complex on a parcel Each s shall pertain specifically to of such Developer's Agreement land described therein. It is anticipated that the parcels of the d the Developer shall enter into additional cements in respect of the development Developer's Agr f additional o portions of the Property, intend that as a condition to j G. Developer and the City 1. o provide for a con- future development of the Property and t ed plan of development sistent, coordinated and fully integrat for the Property, the Developer will prep are and submit for for the Property approval by the City a Master Development Plan as conditioned any further development of the and the city In P Property upon such submission. r and the City acknowledge that the H. While the Develope liminary in nature and that •4 Master Development Plan is only pre from time to time be modified, specific areas of development may, resent agreement con- ' the parties desire to memorialize their P the construction certain development matters including a. cerning q of certain public improvements on the Property and the manner ecific development projects should proceed. in which site-specific ing and the NOW, THEI..F.FORE, in consideration of the forego forth, the parties covenant and agree covenants hereinafter set as follows, -3- z 1. Cash Park_ Fees. The City hereby confirms and agrees that no cash park fees shall be payable by Developer in connec- tion with any project developed on the Westerly PUD. Developer agrees that cash park fees shall be applicable and payable in connection with any project developed on the Easterly PUD. Cash park fees'payable in respect of projects on the Easterly PUD shall be payable concurrently with issuance of a building permit for each such project. Such fees shall be computed on the acreage being rezoned from time to time; pro- vided, however, that such fees shall not be payable in respect of property conveyed to the City or dedicated to a public purpose (: and use, property provided by the Developer for the holding of storm or drainage water or over which a Conservation Ease- ment is granted unless such property is taken into account F in determining compliance with setback and F.A.R. requirements. I. 2. Outdoor Adver t _sing Signs• Upon issuance of a permit f. for construction of a building, structure or.other improvement upon a lot, parcel or site within or part of the Property, the Developer or its assigns shall cause any outdoor advertising a sign which then exists within 400 feet of the boundary line of any lot, parcel or site for which a building permit is issued ereof, to be removed and shall not relocate subsequent to the date h }. or reinstall such sign or any other outdoor advertising sign on the Property. 3, Master Development Plan. On or before October 1, 1g84, -4- the Developer shall submit to the City, a proposed Master Development Plan. a 4. Public Improvements. The Developer shall construct and pay the cost of construction of the following public improve- ments on the Property: a. The extension of Viking Drive from the western most point to which it has been constructed as shown on the plat of CNR Golden Strip East on file and of record, westerly to its intersection with Prairie Center Drive (formerly Schooner Boulevard) as shown on Exhibit D attached hereto and made a part hereof. The construction of the extension of Viking Drive shall be completed in a manner acceptable to the City prior to occupancy of any buildings to be constructed upon the Property. b. Sanitary sewer and water main from a point at the easterly line of Highway 169 abutting the Property ex- tending easterly to the existing 36" sanitary sewer line which crosses the property in a north-south direction and is shown as "Proposed Sanitary Sewer" on Exhibit D. Construction of the sanitary sewer shall be completed in a manner acceptable to the City on or before December 31, 1984. C. A street designated as Golden Triangle Road from Viking Drive extending northerly across the Property to -5-. i the northerly property line, as depicted in Exhibit D. It is agreed by the City and the Developer that Golden Triangle Road shall not be constructed (and assessments will not be levied) until such time as the City is prepared to concurrently construct and does commence construction of j other segments of Golden Triangle Road to the north of the Property in such a manner to allow traffic flow from the Property to the north to Valley View Road. Construction of Golden Triangle Road shall be completed in a manner ac- ceptable to the City not later than one year and sixty days after the City Engineer notifies Developer to prepare final plans for construction. Each of the foregoing improvements shall be constructed in accor- dance with paragraph V.A. of Exhibit E attached hereto and made a part hereof and the Developer shall provide bonds or letters of credit in connection with each such improvement. i Upon completion and acceptance of eagh of the above Y described improvements, the Developer shall convey and transfer such improvements to the City. The City's obligation to accept any of such improvements shall be conditioned upon construction of such improvements in a manner acceptable to the City. 5. Special Assessments. If the Developer fails to con- struct the improvements described in paragraph 4, Developer shall convey to the City (at no cost to the City) such easement ff I i � - or easements in such form and containing such provisions as shall be required by the City on and over the Property for the t construction thereon or therein of such improvements as depicted on Exhibit D. If the City constructs any of such improvements the City may levy assessments for the cost thereof upon the Property in accordance with applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. The cost to be assessed against the Property for construction of Viking Drive and for Golden Triangle Road shall be the cost to construct a 48 foot wide commercial type street (with channelization included). The assessment for the construc- tion of the sanitary sewer shall be the cost to construct and install a sanitary sewer not larger than 12 inches in diameter. 6. Notices. In connection with any projects developed on the Property the Developer shall provide the following notices: a. Prior to the issuance of a building permit on a lot or site on the property, Developer shall notify Hennepin County and Minnesota Departments of Transportation of any work to be done within the rights-of-way of roads , under their respective jurisdictions. Developer shall obtain from such offices any required permits therefor. b. The Developer shall notify the City and the Nine_ Mile Creek Watershed District at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to any grading or removal or cutting of any trees on the Property. -7- 7. Pedestrian/Bikeway. Developer agrees within three (3) years from the date hereof or prior to the development of a third project on the Property, to construct and establish along the contours of Smetana Take, a pedestrian/bike pathway ( connecting the Property on the West Half PUD to the improvements to be constructed on the'East Half PUD. The pedestrian/bike 1 pathway shall be an 8 foot asphalt pathway constructed to City n standards from Golden Triangle Road, along the south side of Nine Mile Creek westerly around Smetana Lake to connect with { a future City authorized pedestrian/bike pathway along Valley j i View Road. A section of this pathway shall also connect to the intersection of Prairie Center Drive and Viking Drive. The parties agree that the pedestrian/bike pathway shall be within a public easement and be in lieu of sidewalks adjacent to Viking Drive in both the West Half PUD and the East Half PUD. 8. Traffic Study. The Developer acknowledges that the City has contracted with BRW, Inc. for a traffic study to be 9 conducted concerning the Valley View Road/Lake Smetana area of the City (as defined in previous traffic studies conducted by BRW, Inc. for the City) and specifically concerning the Prop- erty. The Developer agrees to bear a portion (not to exceed $7,500) of the cost of such traffic study. The City agrees -8- 1 to provide the Developer with a copy of the completed traffic study. 9. Earlier Agreements Void. The City and the Developer hereby agree that the terms of this Master Developer's Agreement shall supercede the 1976 Re-zoning Agreement and the 1982 Agree- ment and that such agreements shall be of no further force and effect. 10. Binding Effect. All of the provisions of this Master Developer's Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against the parties hereto, their successors and assigns and all other persons or entities who or which may subsequently claim an interest in the Property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Master Developer's Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF EDE14 PRAIRIE Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor Carl J. Jullie, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of July, 1984, by Wolfgang H. Penzel, the Mayor, and -9- l � 4 Carl J. Jullie, the City Manager, of the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of said corpora- tion. Notary Public SOUTHWEST CROSSING JOINT VENTURE, a Minnesota partnership By VANTAGE PROPERTIES, INC. By. Its: A Partner STATE OF TEXAS ) ss. COUNTY OF DALLAS ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of July, 1984, by , the of Vantage Properties, Inc., a Texas corporation, on behalf of the corporation.' Notary Public and by CONDON NAEGELE, INC. By: Its: A Partner -10- t- STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) as. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of July, 1984 by , the of Condon Naegele, Inc., a Minnesota corpo- ration, on be aTi if of the corporation. Notary Public { -11- EXHIBITS TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT 1. Exhibit A -- Legal description (the "Property") 2. Exhibit B -- Legal description (the "Westerly PUD") 3. Exhibit C -- Legal description (the "Easterly PUD") 4. Exhibit D -- Improvements 5. Exhibit E -- Standard Terms and Conditions t TN47 Ac That part of the Southeast Quarter of the.Southwest Quarter of Section 120 Township 116, Range 22 described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of Section 12; thence an an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 59 minutes 32 seconds Meat along the South line of said Southwest Quarter a distance of 766.74 feet. thence North 75 degrees 34 minutes 52 seconds East a distance of 20.60 feat; thence North 79 degrees 34 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 52.0 feet thence North 68 degrees 04 minutes 30 seconds East a Eas distance disc ice of 138.0 feat; thence Southg766 degreesn46eminuutesc40seon� seconds East a distance of 180.81 feet to the East line of the Southwest Quarter of Section 12; thence South 3 degrees 55 minutes 30 seconds East along the East line of said Southwest Quarter a distance of 164.75 feet to the point of beginning. Also that pert of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 116, Range 22, described as follows Bagiming at the Southeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 12;thence on an assumed bearing of South 86 dogmas 03 minutes 32 seconds West a distance of 1306.15 feet to the Seutlwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 12; thence North 3 degrees 55 minutes 30 seconds West along the k West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 12 a distance of 164.75 feet; thence south 76 degrees 46 minutes 40 seconds East a distance of 10.19 feet; thence North 64 degrees 01 minutes 06 seconds East a distance of 150.58 feet; thence North 40 degrees 53 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 108.46 feet; thence North 86 degrees 11 =i ainutes 09 seconds East a distance of 195.43 feet; thence North 53 degrees 30 minutes 31 seconds East a distance of 90.80 feet; thence South 38 degrees 22 minutes 03 seconds East a distance of 30.61 feet; thence South a distance of 27.0 feet; thence South 75 degrees 57 minutes 49 seconds a East a distance of 20.62 feet; thence North 56 degrees 49 minutes 17 seconds East a distance of 93.19 feet; thence North 88 degrees 43 minutes 37 seconds East a distance of 45.01 feet; thence South 47 degrees 14 minutes 44 seconds East a distance of 72.18 feet; thence North 51 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds East a distance of 69.81 feet; thence South 76 degrees 02 minutes 06 seconds East a distance of 194.76 feet; thence South 20 degrees 51 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 44.94 feet; thence North 70 degrees 17 minutes 31 seconds East a distance of 71.17 feat; thence North 35 degrees 39 minutes 19 seconds West a distance of 56.61 feet, thence North 70 degrees 24 minutes 27 seconds East a distance of 125.15 feet; thence South 63 degrees 26 minutes 05 seconds East a distance of 49.19 feet; thence South 21 degrees 39 minutes 21 seconds West a distance of 73.16 feet; thence South 39 degrees 26 minutes 24 seconds East a distance of 80.28 feat; thenpo North 57 dpgrees 00 minutes 41 seconds East a distance of 67.96 feet; thence South 56 degrees 28 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of 86.80 feet to the East line of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 12; thence South 2 degrees 30 a minutes 57 seconds East along said East line of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 12, a distance of 183.00 feet to the point of beginning. Also, that part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 116, Raanngge 22, lying Northerly of the Northerly right-of-way of U. S. Highway 5 1,-494 snd lying West of the West line of C.N.R. Golden Strip East, according to the recorded plat thereof. Also, that pert of the Northwest 4 Quarter of Section 13, Township 116, Range 22, lying Northerly of the Northerly right-of-way of U. S. Highway 5 4 494 and lying Easterly of the , Easterly line of Golden Strip, according to the recorded plat thereof, and. altiwte_in Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXCEPT That part of the West 675'feet of Government Lot 7, Section 13, Township 116r Range 22 lying North of a line described as beginning at a point on the East line of said Section 13 distant 649.14 feet Southerly from the Northeast corner thereof; thence Southwesterly at an angle of 75 degrees 27 minutes 27 seconds with said East section line, when measured from South to West, a distance of 817.02 feet; thence deflecting to tL•o right 12 degrees 43 minutes 03 seconds to the West line of said Government Lot 7, according to the Government Survey thereof; Went which from lies the JEa�t linonofdsald Governmont parallel iLota7d distant 920.70 feet TRACT B: That part of the following described property: That part of the West 675 feet of Government Lot 7, Section 13, Township 116, Range 22 lying North of a line described as beginning at a point on the East line of said Section 13 distant 649.14 feet Southerly from the Northeast corner thereof; thence Southwesterly at an angle of 75 degrees 27 minutes 27 seconds with said East of Section line, when measured from South to West, a distance i 817.02 feet; thence deflecting to the right 12 degrees 43 minutes 03 seconds to the West line of said Government Lot 7, according to the Government Survey thereof; which liefeet.Westsfromwestthe drawn parallel with di of a stant 920.70 TRACT C: Lots 4 2, 3, Block 1, Golden Strip; outlots A, B, ' of Golden Strip, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office-Of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin ( County, Minnesota. r+ Legal Description "Westerly PUD" Lot 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, and Outlots A and B, all in Golden Strip, according to the recorded plat thereof EXIMIT B Legal Description. "Easterly PUD" l\All that part of the SW 1/4 and the SE 1/4 of Section 12 and the NW 1/4 and the HE 114 of Section 13; Township 116. Range 22-. Hennepin County. Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the north quarter corner of Section 13. Township 116. Range 22; thence south� 03° 04' 15" east 923.29 feet to the north right of way line of Highway 494 and the actual point of beginning; Thence north 86° 37' 58" west along said right of way. 116.85 feet; thence south 85° 59' 30" west along said line 100.00 feet; thence south 77° 27' 40" west along said line 101.12 feet; thence south' 85° 59' 30" west along said line 20.27 feet , more or less to the southeast corner of Lot 3. Block 1, Golden Strip Plat; thence north 03° 08' 28" west along the north 4 0o136�ine 20"owesttlOt alongC,' of said plat said line 316.882feet.12 feet; thence north 4 thence north I3° 09' 19" west along said line 640.00 feet, more or less to the north line of the NW 1/4 of Section 13; thence north 89° 59' 17" west along said north line I26.83 feet more or less to the intersection with the centerline of the South Fork Nine Mile Creek; thence along the centerline of said creek meandering northeasterly to the intersection with the east line of the SW 1/4 of the SW 114 of Section 12; thence south 02° 30' east along said east line to the tsouth s east corner of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 12I � east along the north line of the HE 1/ north 88° 04' 00" Section 13, 385.45 feet; thence south 02° 10of3 8Highway 444; feet more or les to the north r 38 less d line l,b7b.67 feet thence south 85° 59' 30" west along sai more or less to the point of beginning. 1 And, Lot 3, Block 1 of Golden Strip EXHIBIT C J f� i k. Y d. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGREEMENT i THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into as of July 1984, by and among ROBERT 0. NAEGELE, SR., a single person, ROBERT 0. NAEGELE, JR. and ELLIS NAEGELE, husband and wife, WILLIAM NAEGELE and STEPHANIE NAEGELE, husband and wife, RICHARD `9 CONDON and GWEN CONDON, husband and wife, SOUTHWEST CROSSING JOINT VENTURE (the "Venture"), a partnership consisting of Condon Naegele, Inc., a Minnesota corporation and Vantage Properties, Inc., a Texas corporation, the foregoing hereinafter collec- tively referred to as the "Owners", and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, (, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City". RECITALS A. The Owners hold fee title to or are contract vendees to certain real property (the "Property") located in the City of Eden Prairie, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally t described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. The Owners desire to develop the Property in a manner that will require the construction of a street to be designated as depicted on Exhibit B attached here- as Golden Triangle Road, to and made a part hereof. C. In accordance with that certain Master Developer's Agree- ment dated as of July , 1984 (the "Master Ceveloper's Agreement") , between the Venture and the City, the Venture has � 2 CC agreed to construct Golden Triangle Road from Viking Drive ex- tending northerly across the Property to the northerly property line, as depicted in Exhibit B. If the Venture fails to con- struct Golden Triangle Road in accordance with the terms of the Master Developer's Agreement the Venture will convey to x the City (at no cost to the City) such easement or easements j in such form and containing such provisions as shall be required f by the City on and over the Property for the construction thereon or therein of Golden Triangle Road. D. The City and the Owners desire to enter into an agree- ment concerning the financing of the construction of Golden Triangle Road in the event the City constructs such improvement 1 and also to provide notice of the pendency of construction of Golden Triangle Road. j NOW THEREFORE it is agreed as follows: t 4 1. The Owners consent to the levying of assessments against the Property for the construction of Golden Triangle Road by the City if the Venture fails to construct Golden Triangle Road pursuant to the Master Developer's Agreement. The Owners shall dedicate the right-of-way and easements necessary for the improve- ment. assessed against the 2. The cost to be Property for the g construction of Colden Triangle Road shall be the cost to con- struct a 48 foot wide commercial type street (with channeliza- tion included). -2- 3. The assessment for the construction of Golden Triangle Road shall be levied at any time subsequent to the Venture's failure to construct the improvement in accordance with the Master Developer's Agreement, The assessments against the Prop- erty will be levied against all buildable acreage on a pro rata basis except that park,dedicated property and/or property pur- chased for park shall not be assessed. 4. The City's assessment records for the Property will show the assessments as "pending assessments." 5. The Owners waive notice of any assessment hearing to be held at which hearing or hearings the assessments are to t be considered by the City Council and thereafter approved and t levied. 6. The Owners concur that the benefit to the Property by virtue of the improvement to be constructed exceed the amount of the assessments to be levied against the Property. The Owners waive all rights they have by virtue of Minnesota Statutes § 429.081 or otherwise to challenge the amount or validity of the assessments or the procedure used by the City in apportion- ing the assessments and hereby release the City, its officers, its agents, and employees from any and all liability related to and arising out of the imposition or the levying of the assess- ments. -3- Southwest Crossing I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 27-84 i f AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS } THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. j Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the C-Reg District and be placed in the Office District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, .and hereby is removed from the C-Reg District and shall be included hereafter in the Office District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph 8, shall be, and are amended accordingly. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and t lefinitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of , entered into between Vantage Properties, Inc., and the City of Eden Prairie, dated as of , and that certain Owners' Supplement to Developer's Agreement between Condon-Naegele, Inc., and the City of Eden Prairie, dated as of which Agreement and Owners' Supplement are hereby made a part hereof. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 3rd day of April, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published it a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of ATTEST: ---.------ .: )oiiri D. fraiie, City Clem Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the _— day of Exhibit A Legal Description Lot 1, Block 1, Golden Strip 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. f. i A. DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT I i 'PHIS AGREEMENT made and entered into as of July 1984, by and between Southwest Crossing Joint Venture, a part- nership consisting of Condon Naegele, Inc., a Minnesota corpo- ration, and Vantage Properties, Inc., a Texas corporation, here- inafter referred to as "Developer" and the City of Eden Prairie, p a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City"; WITNESSETH: ) WHEREAS, Condon-Naegele Realty Company, a Minnesota partnership, a predecessor in title to Developer, and City en- i tered into a Re-Zoning Agreement on July 27, 1976 ("1976 Re-Zoning Agreement"), relating to the rezoning and establishment E of an approximately 66 acre Planned Unit Development Concept in Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesota, more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for an amendment to the Planned Unit Development Concept for the Property and for the platting and rezoning from C-Regional Commercial Dis- trict to office District of approximately 8.17 acres of the }} Property more fully described in Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof. (hereinafter the "office Site") , and e WHEREAS, it is the intention of the parties to incor- porate in this Developer's Agreement certain covenants, provi- sions and agreements which are contained in the 1976 Re-Zoning Agreement and relevant to the development of the Property and the Office Site and to set forth further understandings and agreements among the parties hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting J. t. Resolution No. 84-20 relating to platting and Ordinance No. 14-84 relating to rezoning and the terms, covenants and pro- visions hereof., the parties covenant and agree as follows: l 1. City gives its approval to the Planned Unit Dev- elopment Concept Amendment of the Property and confirms the rezoning of the Office Site in accordance with and subject to the conditions and limitations contained in Section 11.40, Subd. 1, of the City Code and subject to such changes, modifica- tions and conditions as are hereinafter set forth. 2. Developer shall not develop, construct upon or maintain the Office Site in any other respect or manner than provided herein. 3. Prior to any grading or building upon the Property or any additional real property adjacent thereto, Developer shall submit to City and obtain City's approval of specific site and building plans. -2- 13`J� C t 4. Developer shall develop the Office Site in con- formance with the materials submitted by Developer or its agents and dated March 5, March 19 and March 20, 1984, reviewed and approved by the City Council on April 3, 1984, and attached hereto as Exhibit C, (all of which materials are hereinafter referred to as the "Development Plans"), subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 5. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 6. Prior to issuance of any permit for building or construction (except grading and foundation) upon the Office Site, Developer shall: A. Submit to the City's Director of Planning and receive the Director's approval jwhich approval won't be unreasonably withheld) of: J. Revised plans indicating parking spaces as nine feet in width, except ten per- cent (10%) of all such parking spaces may be eight feet wide and designated "compact spaces." ii. Revised plans showing architectural elevations of the building, and identify- ing percentage and types of materials to be used for the structure. -3- ;r f: iii. Revised landscaping plans, showing plants and berms to screen parking areas from the public view. The plan shall be r. detailed to identify the location and type of materials used, size and method of installation. B. Submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's approval of plans for slope stabil- ization and erosion control, if applicable. C. Submit to the Fire Marshall, and receive the Fire- Marshall's approval of plans for the improve- ments to be built upon the Office Site. Developer shall construct the improvements to be made upon the Office Site, only in accordance with plans approved by the Di- rector of Planning, City Engineer and the Fire Marshall. 7. Prior to issuance of a building permit on the Office Site, Developer shall notify Hennepin County and Minne- sota Departments of Transporation of any work to be done within the right-of-ways of roads under their respective jurisdictions and obtain any required permits therefor. 8. Developer shall notify the City and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District at least 48 hours prior to any grading on the Office Site. 9. Developer and the City agree that if the number of parking spaces set forth in the plan to be submitted to the City's Director of Planning in accordance with paragraph 6.A.i. -4- L 1 '� 1 of this Agreement proves inadequate to service the tenants and 9 other users of the office building (the "Building") to be con- structed on the Office Site, Developer will provide additional parking spaces in accordance with the following procedure. If during the course of any consecutive six-month period the City shall record at•least ten occurrences of vehicles parked in driveways, fire lanes or upon the Viking Drive right-of-way, p, which occurrences are, in the City's judgment, due to the un- availability of parking spaces within the designated parking spaces for the Building, the City shall notify Developer (or 4 its successor in interest) of the perceived shortage of parking spaces and in connection with such notice shall provide Developer with written documentation detailing the occurrences of off-site or illegal parking. Upon receipt of documentation of such oc- currences, Developer shall arrange for a survey of the parking needs of the Building to be conducted by an independent engineer acceptable to the City, based upon the number.of tenants then occupying the Building. The survey shall he provided to the City within ninety (90) days after the City's notice to the Developer of the City's perceived need for additional parking. If the independent engineer determines that additional parking need be constructed on the Office Site then Developer shall -5- � f y i construct such additional parking in accordance with plans pre- ,,.� pared by the Developer and acceptable to the Developer and to the City. 10. All of the provisions of this Developer's Agree- ment shall be binding upon and enforceable against the parties hereto, their successors and assigns and all other persons or entities who or which may subsequently claim an interest in the Property. $ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Developer's Agreement as of the day and year first above writ- ten. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Wolfgang.li. Penzel, Mayor Carl J. Jullie, City Manager STATE. OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of July, 1984, by Wolfgang H. Penzel, the Mayor, ; and Carl J. Jullie, the City Manager, of the City of Eden "ggg Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public -6--n Southwest Crossing I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-168 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE ?7-84 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 27-84 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , 1984; PRAIRIE:NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 27-84, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 27-84 shall be recorded in the ordinance boon, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk - Southwest Crossing I The following is the full text of the City of Eden Prairie Ordinance No. 21-84, which was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on , 1984. Following the text of the Ordinance, the Developer's Agreement, which is incorporated therein by Section 5 of the Ordinance, is summarized. i CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 21-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANDTHER. AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the C-Reg District and be placed in the Office District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the C-Reg District and shall be included hereafter in the Office District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of , entered into between Vantage Properties, Inc., and the City Ef Eden Prairie, dated as of and that certain Owners' Supplement to Developer's Agreement between Condon-Naegele, Inc., and the City of Eden Prairie, dated as of I. which Agreement and Owners' Supplement are hereby made a part hereof. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 3rd day of April, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of ATTEST: ToFn-6.�rane, Ci`fy-�TerTc--- Wol gang H.Penze , Mayor ' PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the _— day of Southwest Crossing Phase II CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 36-84-PUO-6-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL OESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be } removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 6-84- I-2-Park District (hereinafter "PUD 6-84-I-2-Park"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of 1984, entered into between Southwest Crossing Joint Venture, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD 6-84-I-2-Park, and is hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: i A. PUO 6-84-I-2-Park is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide Plan of the City. B. PUO 6-84-I-2-Park is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code, which are contained in PUD 6-B4-I-2-Park, are justified by the design of the development described therein. 1, 0. PUD 6-84-I-2-Park is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is, removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 6-84-I-2-Park District, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.0, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 15th day of May, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the loth day of July, 1984. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of 7 . Exhibit A 05, 6-8402.1 The PUD Property Page 1 of 3 LAND DESCRIPTION FOR VANTAGE COMPANIES ZONING REQUEST That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 12, and that part of Government Lot 5 and Government Lot 6 of Section 13, lying northerly of the northerly right-of-way Iine of Interstate Highway No. 494 and U.S. Highway No. 5, all In Township 116 North, Range 22 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Government Lot 6; thence North 88 degrees 03 minutes 32 seconds East, assumed basis for bearings, 385.45 feet, along the north line of said Section 13; thence South 02 degrees 10 minutes 58 seconds East, 826.38 feet, to said northerly right-of-way Iine; thence South 85 degrees 58 minutes 19 seconds West, 548.07 feet, along said northerly right-of-way line, to the point of beginning; thence South 85 degrees 58 minutes 19 seconds West, 1128.60 feet, along said northerly right-of-way line; thence North 86 degrees 43 minutes 01 seconds West, 117.88 feet, along said northerly right-of-way Iine; thence South 85 degrees 58 minutes 19 seconds West, 100.00 feet along said northerly right-of-way line; thence South 77 degrees 26 minutes 31 seconds West, 101.12 feet, along ( said northerly right-of-way Iine; thence South 85 degrees 58 minutes 19 seconds West, 16.03 feet, along said northerly right-of-way line; thence North 03 degrees 09 minutes 39 seconds West, 82.15 feet; thence North 40 degrees 37•minutes 31 seconds West, 316.87 feet; thence North 13 degrees 10 minutes 30 seconds West, 640.00 feet, to the north Iine of said Government Lot 5; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 32 seconds West, 126.83 feet, along said north Iino; thence North 75 degrees 34 minutes 52 seconds East, 289.80 feet; thence North 79 degrees 34 minu- tes 30 seconds West, 52.00 feet; thence North 68 degrees 04 minutes 30 seconds East, 140.00 foot; thence North 58 degrees 34 minutes 30 seconds East, 138.00 feet; thence South 76 degrees 46 minutes 40 seconds East, 180.81 feet to the oast Iine of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 12; thence South 76 degrees 46 minutes 40 seconds East, 10.19 feet; thence North 64 degrees 01 minute 06 seconds East, 150.58 feet; thence North 40 degrees 53 minutes 16 seconds East, 108.46 feet; thence North 86 degrees it minutes 09 seconds East, 195.43 feet; thence North 53 degrees 30 minutes 31 seconds East, 90.80 feet; thence South 38 degrees 22 minutes 03 seconds East, 30.61 feet; thence on a bearing of South, 27.00 feet; thence South 75 degrees 57 minutes 49 seconds East, 20.62 feet; thence North 56 degrees 49 minutes 17 seconds East, 93.19 foot; thence North 88 degrees 43 minutes 37 seconds East, 45.01 feet; thence South 47 degrees 14 minutes 44 seconds East, 72.18 foot; thence North 51 degrees 58 minutos 52 seconds East, 69.81 feet; thence South 76 degrees 02 minutes 06 seconds East, 194.76 feet; thence South 20 degrees 51 minutes 16 seconds East, 44.94 foot; thence North 70 degrees 17 minutes 31 seconds { i Exhibit A #5, 6-8402.2 The PUD Property, Continued C Page 2 of 3 East, 71.17 feet; thence North 35 degrees 39 minutes 19 seconds West, 56.61 feet; thence North 70 degrees 24 minutes 27 seconds East, 46.82 feet; thence southerly 486.61 feet along a non-tangential curve, con- cave to the east, radius 1670.00 feet, central angle 16 degrees 41 minutes 42 seconds, the chord of said curve bears South 07 degrees 40 minutes 20 seconds East; thence southerly 332.78 feet along a tangen- tlal curve, concave to the west, radius 1590.00 feet, central angle 11 degrees 59 minutes 30 seconds; thence South 04 degrees 01 minute 41 seconds East, 400.00 feet, to the point of baginning. I')`i y certify thai this c:cs prepared by me or under my direct s.•rervisron ar.d that I am a duly rogister:d :• Lard Surveyor alder the laws of tho Stato of Minneso:i Z Thomas G.Anc.. n TL AttJ..�E3.NO.1G 12 2 Exhibit A N5, 6-8402 The Property Page 3 of 3 LAND DESCRIPTION FOR VANTAGE cOWANIES ZONING REQUEST That part of Government a 2 Lot 6. all In Section i3f 25West,find �HennepintCounty, Minnesota. described as Township 116 North, Rang follows: Commencing at northeast corner of said Government Lot 6; thence North basisumed for 88 d4greeess 03e inutthe north Ilse 32 seconds East, of ass iection13; thencerSouth 2 385 degrees 10 minutes 58 seconds East, 802.35 feet; thence South 85 degrees 58 minutes 19 seconds West, 550.00 feet, to the point of utes 41 beginning; hencehSouthN85tdegreesh 04 g58 mirees Onutesn19 seconds cwest,nds W303.008feet; feet, t thence thence North 04 degrees 01 minutes 41 seconds West, 75.52 feet; South 85 degrees 58 minutes 19 seconds 232t3O162eeaO feet' he ce Soouth North 5 th '57 degrees 38 minutes 21 seconds West, onds West, 139.00 feet; thence South 04 degrees 58 minutes 19 sec degrees 01 minutes 41 seconds East, i2.00 heot, thence South 85 degrees 58 minutes 10 seconds West, 274.00 feet; thence South de degrees i minutes 40 seconds East, 229.59 feet; thence South 04 degrees Ot mtnu- ees 43 minutes tes 41 seconds East, 328.29 feet; thence South 86 degr 01 seconds East, 112418.20feetato the polntt 8 ofbeginntng,58 minutes 19 .55 seconds a P7D., 7supervision o!Uly that this direct ared by me or under my and that I am a duty rerister:d Land surveyor under the laws of I"5tdto of MMiin-neess�oo!2 ThOni:.= aa. 1 {3 Ap Y9qa 1 DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT II THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into as of July , 1984, by and between Southwest Crossing Joint Venture, a 3 partnership consisting of Condon Naegele, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and Vantage Properties, Inc., a Texas corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer" and the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as s' "City;" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development District ("PUD") approval for approximately 36.89 acres, all of which are presently zoned Rural, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A made a part hereof and hereafter referred to as the "PUD property," and for rezoning from Rural to I-2 Park and preliminary platting of a part thereof, consisting of approx- imately 10.09 acres more fully described in Exhibit B made a part hereof and hereafter referred to as "the property;" and, WHEREAS, Developer intends to develop the property and construct thereon four office-industrial buildings; and, WHEREAS, the property is part of other lands in which Developer has an interest and which are the subject of that certain Master Developer's Agreement between the parties hereto made and entered into as of July , 1984, (Master Developer's Agreement), and it is the intention of Developer to develop the property in accordance with the provisions of the Master Developer's Agreement and the provisions hereof. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City's adopting ,j Resolution # and Ordinance # Developer covenants j and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: f 1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance j with the materials dated March 5, 8, 20, and 22, 1984, reviewed and approved by the City Council on May 15, 1984, and attached hereto as Exhibit C, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein. 3. 2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. Prior to issuance of a permit for grading of the property, Developer shall: A. Submit to, in such form and substance as shall be required by, the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's approval of grading, slope J stabilization, sewer, water, drainage, and erosion control plans. Such plan or plans shall indicate that part of the property to be graded and shall contain an inventory consisting of the size, type, and location of all trees twelve (12") inches or greater in diameter as measured four and one-half e (4 1/2 ') feet above the surface of the earth surrounding each such tree, and which are located within the area to be graded and within a distance of twenty-five (251) feet thereof. Developer shall fence the perimeter of the area to be graded with material acceptable to City. No tree or trees ; outside the area to be graded shall be damaged or destroyed. Developer agrees to replace all trees -2- /rl- - V removed, damaged or destroyed outside of the grading area by similar tree species, diameter inch for diameter inch. (e.g. A red oak twelve (12") inches in diameter may be replaced by three red oaks four (4") inches in diameter.) Replacement trees shall be no less than three (3") inches in diameter. S. Receive approval from the Nine Mile Creek Water- shed District of the grading, drainage, slope 1 stabilization, and erosion control plans. 1 C. Deliver to City and cause the same to be duly recorded in the Hennepin County Records Department a conservation easement in such form and substance and covering such part of the property as set forth in Exhibit E attached hereto and made a part hereof. 4. Prior to issuance of any permit for a building upon the property, Developer shall: A. Pay to City the appropriate cash park fee. { S. Submit to, in such form and substance as shall be required by, the City's Director of Planning and receive his approval thereof, plans for: , (1) the lighting of the buildings and all improvements upon the property. a (2) the location, size, and type of signs to be used on the property. (3) the screening of mechanical equipment situated on, adjacent to, or to be used for each building to be constructed upon the property. C. Provide to the City's Fire Marshal all building and construction plans for his review and receive approval thereof by him. D. Prepare and submit to the City's Director of Planning a plan, in such form and substance as shall be acceptable to him, setting forth the landscaping, plantings, and vegetation to be constructed or planted on the property in connection with construc- tion of the improvements thereon and shall have received approval of said Director of Planning on such plan. -3- 1 ' ,1 5. Developer shall notify the City and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District of its intent to grade any part of the property or remove any trees therefrom at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to any such grading or removal of trees. b. As variances granted in connection with PUD approval: A. Buildings constructed on the property may be located so as to have a minimum set-back from Viking Drive of thirty-five (35') feet. B. Developer may construct buildings for use and the same may be used for more than fifty (50%) percent office purposes on condition that Developer has provided automobile parking spaces at the minimum rate of five (5) spaces for each one thousand (1,000) gross feet of building floor area devoted to office use. 7. All. of the provisions of this Developer's Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against the parties hereto, their successors and assigns and all other persons or entities who or which may subsequently claim an interest in the property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Developer's Agreement II as of the day and year.first above written. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By Wolfgang H. Penzel Its Mayor By Carl J. Ju lie Its City Manager -4- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) } SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1984, by Wolfgang H. Penzel, the Mayor, and Carl J. Jullic, the City Manager, of the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Pubilic SOUTHWEST CROSSING JOINT VENTURE, a Minnesota partnership By VANTAGE PROPERTIES, INC. By: Its: A Partner STATE OF TEXAS ) SS. COUNTY OF DALLAS ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this. day of 1984, by the of Vantage Properties, Inc., a Texas corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public and by CONDON NAEGELE, INC. By: Its: A Partner -5- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1984, by the of Cond6n Naegele, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Pu is 0 -6- CONSERVATION EASEMENT This indenture made this day of _ 1982, by and between a ("Grantor"), and the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City")• RECITALS 1. Grantor is the owner in fee simple of the real property legally described in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incor- porated herein by this reference (the "Conservation Area"). 2. Grantor and City wish to enter into an agreement which will grant to City an easement for conservation and preservation of the terrain and vegetation of the Conservation Area and to prohibit certain acts destructive thereof. AGREEMENTS The parties agree as follows: 1. Grantor hereby grants, bargains, sells, and conveys to City and its successors and assigns an easement in, under, on and over the Conservation Area (the "Conservation Easement"), and City hereby accepts the Conservation Easement. 2. The Conservation Easement is granted and accepted subject to the following terms and conditions: A. The Conservation Area shall be preserved predominantly in its natural condition. No trees, shrubs, or other vegetation shall be planted upon the Conservation Area, and no trees, shrubs, or other vegetation shall be removed from the Conservation Area without the prior written consent of City. B. No building, road, sign, billboard, utility or other man-made structure shall be placed in the Conservation Area without the prior written consent of City. C. Grantor assumes the obligation of maintaining the Conservation Area, subject to the provisions hereof. EXHIBIT E D. No trash, waste or other offensive material, soil or landfill shall be placed upon or within the Conservation Area without the prior written consent of the City. E. No change in the general topography of the Conservation Area landscape,including but not limited to excavation, dredging, movement or removal of soil, shall be made without the prior written consent of the City. F. The duration of the Conservation Easement is perpetual. 3. This agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties, their successors and assigns. 4. Nothing contained herein shall impair any right of City now held or hereafter acquired to construct or maintain public utilities in or on the Conservation Area. Grantor By Its By Its CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By Wolfgang H. Penze , Mayor By CarT Jullie, Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _-e day of , 198 , by ,the andny of ' a ,corporation, on behalf o t e corporation. Notary c STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 198 , by Wolfgang H. Penzel, the Mayor, and Carl J. Ju ie, the Manager, of the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Pu is +. A, 6-8402.2 EXHIBIT A Description of Conservation Easement That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Golden Strip East, according to the recorded plat thereof, described as follows: Beginning at an angle point on the east line of said Lot i, said angle point is the northwest corner of Outlot C, said Golden Strip East; thence South 04 degrees 01 minutes 41 seconds East 84.00 foot along the east line of said Lot 1; thence South 85 degrees 58 minutes 19 seconds West 132.00 feet; thence North 49 degrees 01 minutes 41 seconds West 55.00 feet; thence North 04 degrees 01 minutes 41 seconds West 65.00 feet; thence North 49 degrees 01 minutes 41 seconds West 78.88 feet to the north fine of said Lot 1; thence North 85 degrees 58 minutes 19 seconds East feet 151.00 feet along said North line to an angle point; thence South 49 degrees 01 minutes 41 seconds East 107.01 feet along the northeasterly line of said Lot 1, to the point of beginning. Containing 25,222 square feet, 2343.2 square meters, or 0.5790 acres. I hereby certify that this description was pre- pared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Thomas G. Arneson II MN. REG. NO. 12682 Date q z—U T Southwest Crossing Phase II CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-174 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE 36-84-PUD-6-84 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 36-84-PUD-6-B4 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the loth day of July, 1984; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 36-84-PUD-6-84, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs. the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 36-84-PUD-6-84 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on July 10, 1984. Wolfgang N. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John O. Frane, City Clerk n 'j i Southwest Crossing Phase II The following is the full text of the City of Eden Prairie Ordinance No. 36-84-PUD- 6-84, which was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on , 1984. Following the text ). of the Ordinance, the Developer's Agreement, which is incorporated therein by Section 5 of the Ordinance, is summarized. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 36-84-PUD-6-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance y (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. i Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 6-84- I-2-Park District (hereinafter "PUO 6-84-I-2-Park"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms a'nd conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of 1984, entered into between Southwest Crossing Joint Venture, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the .terms and conditions of PUD 6-84-I-2-Park, and is hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD 6-84-I-2-Park is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD 6-84-I-2-Park is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of i the City Cade, which are contained in PUO 6-84-I-2-Park, are justified by the design of the development described therein. 0. PUD 6-84-I-2-Park is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be; and hereby is, removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 6-84-1-2-Park District, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 15th day of May, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 10th day of July, 1984. ATTEST: John D. frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day Df f nlerinitA�;l,urt TO: Mayor au,d City Council Parrs, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission T1Ulll: Carl Julli.c, City Mannger FROM: Cob Lambert, Director of Conununi.t.y Services �rlCt� DATE: June 13, 1984 SUCJFCT: Request from J. It. Nord Incorporated 111 1983, the City Council approved the Timber Creek Development Pronosal located at the northwest corucr of Duck Lake 'frail and County Road 4. As a part of that devel- opment proposal, the Developer dedicated 8 acres for a ne:i-hilboTl,00d park. 7hi-s neiglihorhood p:u'k hats never formally been named, but has been referred to as the Timber Crock Park achc:r it was associated with the Timber Creek Development and the Duck Lake Park due to its location on Duck Lake Wail. Attached to this memo is a Ietter fro,�,'John Nord, Presicica,t of J. R. Nord Tncorpurated and one the present owaors of tho development ,aliich has been renamed rden Valley. Mr. IQord has requested that the City consider naming the part: 11den valley Park, as it will he assoc.iat.ed with the Eden Valley Dcveiopnicnt Proposal. Ilse Community Services staff concur with tile, rationale for naming this park Eden Vailley Park and rc•co,nmend formal pproval by the City Council to name the 8 acre park on the north side of Duck Lake Trail, "Edon Valley Park". UNAPPROVED MINUTES - EVEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RCCREATION, AND 14ATU11AL RESOURCES COINMISSION Jane lII, 1984 -2- Jeuh recently requested a reimbursement from the City in the amount of a389.2d for removal of the trail. Lambert told the Coinnission that he could find no reference in a9ree;ncnts hetrreen the City and the developer or in the plan that shoers the City required this trail and suggests that the City not rair;,bursc ilr•. Jeub for his expenses in removing the trail. i V.OTION; linker moved to make a recommendation to the Council not to c rc: irG;u-se Mr. Jeub for his expenses in renoving the trail from his property. Coot: seconded the motion and it carried. B. Rc +,est from J.R. Nord Inc. ' Refer to letter dated May 24, 1984 from J.R. Nord, Inc. and memo dated June 13, 1984 from Bob Lambert, Director of Community d Services. Mr. Nord is requesting that the City rename the park located on the corner of Dock Lake 'frail and County Road 4 as Eden Valley Park to identify it with t!.e cleve]opnuent ill r•rhiClr it is located. Lambert rccoaecnded the approval of the name charge. mar iOIJ_ A oration was made by Gonyea to recommend that. the Council approve naoing the eight acre park on Duck Lake Trail "Eden Valley Park". B3iker seconded the motion and it carried. V. DCV;.LCt,"1IEN7 PROPOSALS None VI. REPIl T" OF COMAISSIOi';F.RS, BOARDS PAD STAFF A. Rcrorts of Director of Community $erViCeS 1. Lct.t.r,r from Metro Council Regardino Final Environmental ImPIct S.tal c w.r Refer to memo dated June 13, 1.9;^ froin Rob L,mhert, Director of Con,,,:unity Services, letter dated May 31, 191144 from the Pietro Co;ru:i1 and Final I:nvironmentai Impact Statcnent dated May 211, 1984. Ihis'is an info-mation item only. Lamh(eH. stated that thf cra,ior envirnnsi +d.=1 concerns on Count-Y 6 are tho curt crw,sinn ovur I isle-Milo Cvc•et and Lhc wrt- wild unrth of Finch l l,cr,cl l.,ri,c c,.st of Count.., Rand a. To alleviate 11�(' ira),.u:i of tlx: urt.lan:', this orn,4"t fill in:;%rov(r other w4land locations by l, volopina rl:;�n Wdlrr roads ar.d rnal.irr.9 them more visual iy ;rl po'll'inrc. July 10, 1984 CITY OF FUEN PRAIRIE HU�NEPIN COUNTY, I•11IWf.CS07A RESOLUTION NO. 84-155 RESOLUTION ACCLPTING BID WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following improvcia�nts: I.C. 51-374, Homeward Hills Park. bids +yore received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received are si:o:.,n on the attached Su::xary of Bids; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer recon-mends award of contract to Forest Lake Contracting, Inc_ as the lo,,:est responsible bidder. NOW, 71!1REF0RF, BE It RLSOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Ccuncil as' fol I ows: The I•.ayor and City 'anager are hereby autbori4ed and directed to enter into a contract with Forest Lake Contracting; Inc. in the nai:,e of the City of Eden Prairie in the a+,,ount of $117,937.50 in ac-ordonce with the plans and cprcifications thereof approved by the Co:nreil and on file in the off;cc of tiie City Engineer. ADOi'TID by the Edcn Prairie City Council on July 10, 1984. lluifywrg H. Pc:i :el, h'ayor Ai It T: S:hl. City f'1i:ik 1,. 2 TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Carl Julii.e, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works /� ,� FROM: Rodney W. Rue, Design Engineer/ K DATE: June 28, 1984 SUBJECT: Summary of bids for Improvement Contract 51-374 Homeward Hills Park Sealed bids were received at 10:30 A.M. on Thursday, June 28, 1984, for the above referenced improvement. Ten bids were received and tabulated as follows: BIDDER BID SECURITY TOTAL BID AMOUNT Forest lake Contracting, Inc. 5% $117,937.50 Wangerin, Inc. 5% $138,455.005% $139,843.35 Bnperial Developers, Inc. Enebak Construction Co. 5% $144, .50 Reisinger Excavating, Inc. 5% $146>39747.50 5% $150,345.00 Opus Corporation 5% $159 578.75 { G.L. Contracting, Inc. 5% $169,745.50 Brown & Cris, Inc. 5% $184,725.00 E & H Earthmovers, Inc. Carl Bolander & Sons Co. 5% $184,993.25 Engineer's Estimate $177,150.00 The low hid is approximately 33% helow our estimate. Reccnna:end award of contract 51-374 to Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. in the anount of $117,937.50. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNLPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-169 ' Relating to Parking Restrictions On S.A.P. 181-107-04 from Mitchell Road to Trunk Highway 169 . In the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota it THIS RESOLUTION, pa ssed this 10th day of July 1984, by the City of Eden Prairie in Hennepin County, Minnesota. The municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called the "City": g II; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the "City" has planned the improvement of MSAS 107 (Anderson Lakes 3. Parkway) from Mitchell Road to Trunk Highway 169, and, WHEFZLAS, the "City", will be expending Municipal State Aid Funds on the improvement of said street, and, WHEREAS, said improvement does not conform to the approved minimum standards as previously adopted for such Municipal State Aid Streets and that approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal Slate Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions, and, WHEREAS, the exient of These restrictions that would be a necessary pre- requisite to the approval of this construction as a Municipal State Aid project in the "City", has heen determined. NOW, '(H(CFZFFO;ZE, IT IS HEREBY Re SOLVED: Thai the "City", shall prohihit the parking of motor vohicles on both sides at all times. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 10, 1984. i i ir'olfgang H. Penzel, Mayor `T j Al TEST: SEAL Jc>!:n D, Frnne, Ci ur k J�IU� i 1. To: Mayor and Council From: John Frane Date: July 3, 1984 Re: Resolution 84-171 Setting a date for a hearing for a Multi Family Housing Project. (Edenvale Apts. II) $29750,000 The bond approving attorney is requesting the City to "ratify" the hearing date of July 17, 1984 per the official publication. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RATIFYING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED HOUSING BOND PROGRAM PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C, AND THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE THEREFOR WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, authorizes a city to plan, administer and make or purchase a loan or loans to finance one or more multifamily housing developments or the rehabilitation of multifamily housing developments after adoption of a housing plan;and WHEREAS, the housing plan must be considered at a public hearing held after notice published at least 30 days prior to the date of said hearing after which the housing plan may be adopted by resolution of the governing body of the city with or without amendment; and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie(the"City")held a public hearing on the Citys Housing Plan(the"Plan")after at least thirty (30)days' published notice on fc."q �9 19 tJ and by the passage of Resolution No. _ (the "Plan oTu non on i:(.f � /Yf L adopted the Plan;and WHEREAS, in accordance with its requirements, the Plan provides for programs for the issuance of bonds to finance multifamily housing developments which are affordable to persons and families of low and moderate income and are consistent with the goals,conditions and requirements of the Plan;and WHEREAS, a program for the issuance of bonds to finance a multifamily housing development must be considered at a public hearing after notice published at least 15 days prior to the date of said hearing after which the program may be ndopted by resolution of the governing body of the city with or without amendment;and WHEREAS, Eden Investments Partnership, a Minnesota general partnership (the "Developer'), tins presented to this City Council (the "City Council') a proposal for the issuance of multifamily housing revenue bonds to finance the acquisition of land and construction of an approximately 70-unit rental apartment project in the City(the"Project"); W1113REAS, in order to expedite the program approval process by the City, the Developer requested the City staff to select tite date of the public hearing on the proposed housing bond program for the Project and to publish notice thereof in the form of notice Otnehed hereto as Exhibit A in the official newspaper of the City prior to consideration of the Project by the City Council of the City;and WHE..REAS, in response to the request of the Developer, the City staff selected Jtdy 17, 1984 as the date for the public hearing on the proposed housing bond program for the project and published notice thereof in the official newspaper of the City; -1- J�IU,1 NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED THAT: 1. The City Council of the City of Eden Prairie will conduct a public r hearing on the proposed housing program for the Project on July 17, 1984 at 7:30 p.m. 2. The publication by City Clerk of the City of the public notice, substantially in the form of the notice attached hereto as Exhibit A, in the official newspaper of the City at least fifteen (15),days prior to the date established for the public hearing by the preceding paragraph of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. 3. The City Manager of the City is hereby authorized to proceed with the preparation of the housing bond program relating to the Project, for presentation to this City Council at the public hearing herein authorized. 4. The law firm of Holmes do Graven,Chartered Is hereby authorized to act as Bond Counsel to assist with the preparation of the housing bond program relating to the Project and with the preprartion of any other documents necessary with respect to the issuance of bonds in connection with the Project; provided that the payment or reimbursement of the fees or expenses of Bond Counsel shall not be a general liability of the City, but shall be paid or reimbursed from the program revenues or by the Project developer. The City Manager, City Clerk, City Attorney and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to assist Bond Counsel in the preparation of the program and the necessary documents. ADOPTED: , 1984 ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk -2- CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-162 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and, • WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and, WHEREAS, the proposal of the Lion's Tap for continued use of the Lion's Tap property as a Commercial. requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: approximately 1.26 acres located at the northwest quadrant of Highway #169 and County Road #4 be modified from Low Density Residential to Commercial. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this day of r 1984. l Wolfgang enzel, Mayor ATTEST: -John 0. Frane, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION P84-163 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LIOW S TAP FOR BERT NOTERMAN AND LYNN CHARLSON BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Lion's Tap for Bert Noterman and Lynn Charlson dated June 6, 1984, consisting of 24.2 acres into three dots, a copy of t;11lich is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conforridnce with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and aRleftclments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the _ day of 1984. I. Wolfgang H. Penze I, Mayor ATTEST: •JnLn �. Frnnc, C-iL,V Cler(: --- - 14 A of Tralisportation I I ot 2055 No. Lilac Drive Golden VillICY, N"filli-ICSOKI 554,22 May 24 1984 Mr. Chris Enger, Planning Director City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, M" 55344 ho In Reply Refer TO: 315 '84 S.P. 2744 review of Lions Tap located at Jet. T.H. 169 and CSA11 4 in part of the southeast quarter of Section .20, Township 116, Range 22 in City of Eden Prairie Hennepin County Dear Mr. Enger: We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. we find the plat acceptable for further development with consideration of the following comments: -We assume that the proposed work on CSAH 4 is being reviewed by the Hennepin County Department of Transportation. They have thy" approval authority for work on the county road. The concept as shown would greatly improve the Asisting intersection. It wO& solve an ongoing problem of encroachment on the highway right ot way by the adjacent development. -A sight corner should be provided at the intersection of T.H. V and CSAIT 4. Also care must be given to Placement of Proposed landscaping so as not to interfere with sight lines. -A permit moi-A be approved before any work is begun within the exsivLing highway right of way. Specific requirements for the design of the entrance can he worked out when the permit is applied for. -If the county road is moved to thy• east the oxsiaLing right turn lane and by-pass lone will have• to be extended to the vast to C. Enycr May. 24, 1984 Page Two provide for proper operation. -No di.r,tances to the highway centerline were shown therefore, we were unable to determine how the plat relates to our exsistin" right of way line. If you have any questions in regard to this review please contact Evan Green at 545-37G1, Eat. 119. Thank you for your cooperation in this natter. Sincerclyir" W.M. Crmlford,�--15. District. Engineer 4 MEMORANDUM and Natural Resources Commission T0: Parks, Recreation FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services Pcu.— DATE: June 29, 1983 SUBJECT: Lion's Tap Enclosed, for your review, is the May 4, 1984 Planning Staff Report on the Lion's Tap project, and the June 7, 1984 Planning Staff Report. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission is reviewing this proposal because the Commission initially reviewed the Lion's Tap proposal in 1983. The proposal for the Lion's Tap itself if relatively the same; however, there is a request for a Comprehensive Guide Plan chanae and preliminary platting for 3 lots on 24.2 acres. One lot will be 1.6 acres of commercial for the Lion's Tap. The proponent is also requesting two residential lots; one..of 9.6 acres and one of 13 acres. The Planning Staff is recommending approval subject to Lot 2 being increased from 9.6 to 10 acres to meet the minimum lot size in a rural zone. The Community Services Staff recommend approval as per the June 7, 1984 Planning Staff Report recommendations. BL:md MEMO TO: Panning Commission FROM: Chris Engel', Director of Planning PROJECT: Lion's Tap Comprehensive Guide Plan Change and Preliminary Platting LOCATION: Northwest corner of State Highway #169/212 and County Road #4 DATE: June 7, 1984 Background This request has been continued from the May 14, 1984 Planning Commission meeting in order to resolve the problem of rural tracts of property proposed in the preliminary plat of less than ten acres. Since that meeting, the proponent and the Staff have been in contact with Mr. Lynn Charlson who owns property north of this tract of land i and is himself owner of the 5.83-acre parcel on the northern end of the original A preliminary plat the Planning Commission revicv:ed on May 14, 1934. Since that time, Mr. Charlson has agreed to plat the 5.83- acre parcel together with land that he i owns to the north of the property so that a remnant tract is not left of less than ten acres. i 1 The enlarged request for preliminary platting has been correctly published and notifications to surrounding property ovnters made. Planning Staff had suggested to Mr. Noterraan that he modify Block 1, Lot 2, of the request so that it contained ten acres of land rather than 9.6. The revised plat indicates that this change has not been made. i The ten acres of property that Mir. Charlson o;vns on the north portion of this revised plat, straddles County Road 414 and the platting of it will leave a remna.it on the east. side of County Road 1r'4 which can he. combined administratively with additional property hir. Charlson owns so that a small remnant on the east of #4 is not. left. Ho;<ever, the final plat should reflect the 66-foot right-of-Tray platted as a part of this proposal for County Roar! 14. In the same manner, the parcel in which the Lion's Tap sits on in Block 1, Lot 1, should provide for platting of right-•of-way for County Road r'4. a f RECO�:':etal^,T IONS N -rhe planninq Staff could recon:rrc nd approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Lod I`• nsity Residontial to Cor,nercial for 1.6 acres of land and Preliminary . flatting of opproaiiaalel•y 25 acres into throo. logs according to plans dated February 9, 10, and ,.tune 10, 1982, and subject to the following: 1, 1. Lot 3 should plat: the 66 feet of riglit-of-rray for County Road ;4 and 53 feet q of rirjht•o!-gray for Cden Prairie Road. Lot 1 should plat 33 feet of the f %Y;cA.crn half of right-of-tray fcr County Road �4. 2.• Lot 2, Rlnck 1, should bf: remised in the final plat. to matte it a full tfrn acres rcfih: r than 9.6 1.0 that a variancr, is not no(YeJ. There is adequate wren in Lot. 3, Block I, to conlribuic fear•-Lintli: of an acre to Lot 2, Block } 1, so Lhat tic variances arc nccf,sary. 3. Cash Park Fee would be required on a per acreage basis for the Lion's Tap parcel at time of building permit issuance and on a per unit basis for parcels two and three. t ti MINUTES i t. f P i i j j i 111• U[.v,.r_V.n�rr, r n•.n v�n_� r. A. LIOi " TAP, fi^rt F;oterY.lar,. Crn�ru ehrnsire Guide Plan P.mendrn-mi. from L: acres,, and hAimina � flat ( i'.;,� r lc!:�rtial to Cc�r:rr•cr l for 11 5 r 17.0 icros into ihree loin. l or ,:ion: !:or`L!:st quadrant of High,,!ay T;1; and C.rn;:11:.4r Road �'�1. (Board of 1; �,:,,ls aci.ion rcquircJ) A conticucu puhl:. 'Isar inn. T If� PI::r iriwi Cr 1 sim had considerod t!;is re, ost at. t.hc, Hay 7, 1984 n. t.iix. The iu•pl I al of MC t.o.7mhmsWe Wide Plan chJil,It_ n, 17-•.rrt II a! to Pi,: .Ici,l xi,! cuar a nrl <;etion of the pre ll li;r, y pl to IIIi !n• prof;n a nt is in the process of trying io oiti rin , vxe, of l,u,d t , th^ nor•i.h fl•L':n Mt-- Chad:on to In�'r:e Lot :1 tr act lot u,;,E, this ist.: c hod not been resolvcO by t.lr- tinw of th,, rrc,�t ii:• ltlll.lnt:+'. to the ,iura' 11, 14.ir, n,iCt iflf. I,y' t r nrr, cc ,t I by KahA4 to cm inue the hc:UIM to t:. Planning Commission Minutes 2 June 18, 1984 p IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. LION'S TAP_, Bert Noterman and Lynn Charlson. Comprehensive Guide Pln: Mieiiiluient from Low Density Residential to Co;:.nereial for 1.6 acres; ar- Preliminary Plat of 27.0 acres into three lots (with variances before f.i. Board of Appeals). Location: Northwest quadrant of Highway V169 atr County Road ;4. A continued public hearing. The Commission reviewed the originally proposed plat for the subject project, . well as a request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Fuuendaient for the property, at it j meeting of May 7, 1994, and acted upon the Guide Plan request, postponing actk on the plat request pending resolution of adequate acreage for the northern-nu:) lot within the proposed plat. The item was again postponed on May 14, 1984. if Planner Franzen reviewed the Staff memorandum dated June 7, 1984, updating tl: activity regarding this proposal since its last review by the Planning Cu.w.-missior; Mr, [tick Sathre, proponent's engineer, reviewed the revised plat and 1: , configurations with the Planning Commission. Mr. Sathre pointed out that t1, right-of-way for County Road 4 in this vicinity had already been dedicated to tip City. ilorrever, if it were added to the acreage for the parcel proposed to be fl., acres in size, this would bring that: parcel to over ten acres, therehy meeting th minim.im rcquireia trts for the P.ural District of ten-acre minimum lot: size. �. Marhula questioned why the Staff recommendation was to require proponent to mcc• the ten-acre ninirrern for the Rucal district as opposed to a variance in th. situation. Planner Franzen stated that no hardship of a physical nature had be-, sho•.:n by proponent. Mr. Bert Noterman, proponent, stated that he felt that he had made enou,.' compromises regarding ttte finalization of this development with the City. 1' stated that he had originally purchased t%-m five-acre parcels when the_ City Ck, only required a five-acre miniciim lot size in the Rural Districts, he had agrr to restrict the size of his business, and he had purchased additional road right. of-way for tho t!vcnival reloc,:tian of County Road 1i4 in this vicinity. IIe star that he did not feel Ire r.;ould need to purchase an additional four-tc,"U S of acre atl this time. MOTION_1: Motion rtas m,-,do by Gartner, seconded by Marhula, to close the public hearing. Motion carried---5-0-0 MolION 7 h';,t ion tras t::.c!; by G:u tncr, secnn(!Pd b;; Hivr nil:, t.o roc;�s.:n,:nd to the City fo:nr..: auto oval till t.h, rcru;st ui ana t ynn -on for pr �Ii;sinary plat: rural t,l an I n^ co, on plans ctit:d J:nt 1 '. ',.„ct th" r t..! .rnu tl i„i. Of t,,'f 'c!tart. d,1!rd Josh. 7, 1" : 1, tin,t�- , t •::htioi :.' �f tilt, Jtm; 7, �,:•u,ura t�� allow for a 9.o•-;icrc lol. rL,.it,r C'vv i 3 -tr o.,ri ,un) 7b:n ltu I .ttl.(inst.) Planning Comission Minutes 3 June 18 1984 Chairman Bearman and I4arhula stated that they voted against as they did not feel the variance proposed had been justified. Chairman Bearman added that he was noL in favor of the small acreage and rezoning allowed for the commercial structure on the south end of the property, either. 1i1: . CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION H84-167 RESOLUTION APPROVLI;G THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PRAIRIE KNOLL FOR HESTIA HO iES, INC. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edcn Prairie City Council as follows: . That the preliminary plat of Prairie Knoll for Hestia Homes, Inc., dated April 18, 1984, consisting of 24 acres into GO lots and outlots, a copy of %rhich is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John U. iranc, City Clerk STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FRO'll: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THR((Ali: Chris E.nger, Diroctor of Planning DATE: May 4, 1934 PROJECT: Prairie Knoll APPLICANT: Brian Novak FEE O';IP;ER_: Michael Pohlen REQUEST: Planned Unit Devciop,ment District Review with variances, Zoning District Change from Roral to R1-9.5 and Preliminary Plat of 24 acres into 60 single family lots. [iar. �aund J \ - �m �� The Comj.)rehen;ivr Guide Plan identi- 1 r. `FtcYa fies a Lor, Density kosi(lent ial land use for this site. Surrounding land uses are primarily Low Density Residential to the west, and south :I-<V of the site across Valley Vico Road. _1. Y �.\ \ J_ The property is bordered on the north by a part: and flood plain ;A �1 area. _.\ _._..../ The general site character can best hE d+scrjbed as a fringe area to a lo+, lanc! push. Thera is a variety J Of crcd cl ,tngcs On the 0tv, with ,�, - _r Steel' along th +,;~tern rt I_ s t d11` !I) r` bit ,c,, and a natural earth ro;:nd in I -� G 1; e, 1 L In it 1\n � ` •. lit uantral portion ri�u+r <<)nroXI t� r I-t 'I +1 tf y rtatrly ?'; iraG ;ovc to arcls to ' ) k ,` G j i, the r;, st ,md c;1;i . Ve J tot,io11 1s prir;urily I(mIand typc, ronF,istirq of cLn, poplar, vailia: rldrr sunac. lh. sit.e is a1 fec.iad Eby a q tr,+l floacl plain at cicv;+flan X 2V,0, vh i0l rurr, alonq 11; .pp t inr of lui s jn 131,;..!< 5 aml The 1n.c nt- 1 trr l for a 5 i`l ,, ir;i i,l Ih'„ l+ 'tt i '.L•-j:'t ,r ..,. .. ... .. G Review, rezoning from Rural to 111-9.5, and a preliiainary plat of approximately 24 acres int:u 60 single family lots. 'llie proponent is concentrating the density in the most developahle portions of the site and setting aside several oativts as natural areas whore there are steep slopes, or extremely low areas. The propondnt is seeking variances under the MD to allow for lot sizes less ttran 9,500 square foe t. The lot sizes avera!,e approximately 9,300 square feet and range from 6,600 to 12,700 square feet. 'flx: proponent is also se^kinri side yard setback variances to allow for a zero lot line concept. 'file overall density of t.lre project, based upon 24 acres of land, is 2.5 units per acre, which is consistent with the Coniprehensive Guide Plan. The density within the developable portion of the site of approximately 16 acres is 3.8 units per acre. Approximately eight acres of the site will be left as natural open space. The proponent wishes to acquire approximately 2.44 acres of City-owned land at the northern edge of the site, near the top of the knoll. The proponent has begun discussions with the Community Services Director regarding this acquisition. Site Plan 1 60 single family detached housing units are proposed to be constructed within the most developable portions of the site. There are four basic floor plans, including one-bedroom, tiro-bedroom, three-bedroom, and three-bedroom loft. Single bedroom units will have a one-car detached garage and two- and three-bedroom units will have a tv:o-car garage. Tire zero lot line concept applies not only to the individual housing unit, but to the garages as well. Variances will be necessary from side yard setback requirements. The proponent has indicated that tine association documents will address issues relative to mutual easements required by the zero lot line concept, placein:-�nt: of barriers including fences and hedges near, or on easement locations, maintenance and use regulations for jointly-owned garages, architectural controls for any permanent additions such as decks or building expelslon, and restrictions for outdoor storage of equipment and recreational vehicles. The proponent should provide Staff a copy of these legal documents for review. Arch i tec titre The propon:�nt has suixnitt:ed floor plans fur four basic unit. types ranging in sire from 7.12 square: feet For the one-bedroom unit to 1,235 square feet for a three- bedroo;m loft unit.. Each of tir> units will have a par 1,ial basement. The proponent has provided ,, start elegy tiun to ho�a the garage, household, find fences Will be inte(o it d to font a M-lon z�rchitectural ele :ant, file units will he primarily of Woodfi,:.nc� construction, With ch;naclr:r, that. aright ho dcscrihed as a I co:drinatir r of lairr:nr'.i: and f„)ra,'oian rc.h,tecture. Since. only four b�+sic unit t.;p:s and e 1 v,;tiens are pr epno od, Staff r,cnu i nds that th architec lur l controls ref lert a lr it>,i coli)r r n is iu ordor to provi,;=_ unit}' tlrrough,,ut tile project, n•uch to,n'rwsf� proj Oet. Tn:� Irr,,?iun hoild pruvid^ color si,r;rIes for rev Iew. Roof pibh, >rrinalo color, <tlel sidilly ra„t.r ial -,h^;ild all he specified lu provide ar;hil:ect.nr,n1 conl.int1:11y atuotig the var'ici.y of unit. types. Gr,ainq lr;, prop;,rr r;l h;r• provi t,:cl a n nr,din,I pl ut and a (I'A'i l d y din.: 1'1111, t:L icl, ar f cut. ;nia t r I(. 1'inu..tl m a9in^, is pr,y;�:ci i..h r r v A thz, n,rt+,rA t;.,irr in I of "xr n „ �I- an,! al.ui 10 rn edge 'd t.iic prvjo,.L u,i ut Franklin Court. The steepest slopes on site will be left undisturbed as part of Outlot G. Since cut areas. west of the cul-de-sac on Franklin Court will result in tree loss, Staff would recorvnend that the proponent provide a reforestation plan to restore the slope as close to the existing natural condition as possible such that a natural screen can be retained between this project and the adjacent half-acre low density residential lots to the west. Utilities Sewer and water service can be provided to this site from Valley View Road. There is an existing sanitary sewer line running through this site, over which the City currently does not have a permanent easement. The proponent should provide an appropriate easement as determined by the City Engineer. S_ignaye/Luting v The proponent should provide an overall street lighting and signage program for review. Parks/Pec!_es_trian Systems There is an existing bike trail system which runs parallel to Valley View Road over which the City has no pertnatient easement. The proponent has indicated an extension of this paved trail system along the north side of Trilium Drive to connect into the park area at the northern portion of the project through Outlot E. This portion of s the trail should be five-foot wide concrete sidewalk. With road improvements anticipated for Valley View Road in the future, which will include a sidowalk and/or bike trail along either side of Valley View Road, Staff would recommend that a five- ) foot tide concrete sidevialk be provided along one side of Franklin Court, Ontario Boulevard, and Trilium Drive to connect to this future bikeway, or walk;,ay. The proponent is also providing a series of natural trails through the site, which connect to a nunwer of out.lot areas and the City park. The proponent has indicated that these pathI•tays will be. natural and will require only mowing and general lawn- type maintenance. Proponent will al�;n be. con<.tructing a totlot area on Outlot A at the beginning of Phase I1, Staff nds that this totlot area be fenced for safety purposes. 1):a.ails of the totlot area should I>e provic-1 d for revier) by the Connurtity Se+'vices Diroctor. Staff reco1119+endS that the totlot area be constructed concurrent with phase I. Lahti°;caning The proponent han ii!dicotr,d that, each yard trill be sodded and p+-ovid:!d with two conifers and ogle siun9e irec of either ash, birch, or poplar variety. In addition, i th prol!iru tt in c,tovi.fimi for a partial lands:cai?r screen 6 twcten the rear lots in the ren'.er portt>t o. the pro•jcct to rice int- +.he bac!:y,u-4 space betweon adjacent units. Stiff ,:!a,.::ts th.+t, no. proponents overall 1)1xii.ing pl n utilitc fo:+ 9.tian 1 planti+:c)' rofl, c:tt r of lost land �cgcta t,n ,;hirli iAtuhL iurl!k 1oc,cruol, cr,rtbrrry, elder, of othi'' tiinil:r v,n•iett�.,. fl no(lil 1 )ctli i> cart tt;tct th outlet; slauld I sn in,lic.- ovrrs:iori and s+uu) p1ttcnr,t; 'o 'c'n�riv Y f he a ipc+ winiwm!ll and Ccnjifiro!:; tj%'L`� 'j : fcrt hok.;ht.. (i c.m i Roaciwa�s Valley View Road from Eden Prairie Road east towards the train tressel should be considered for upgrading in lieu of recent residential developments includin;i Village Greens, APple t,rovcs, Paulsen's Additions, and Autumn broods. The 1975 a, feasibility study for this section of roadway recornuended icrprover:u'nts relative to ; additional right-of-way and increased road width. One alternative identified an SO- foot right-of-way and a 32-foot road surface. This segment of Valley View Road currently has it 66-foot road right-of-:raY. Staff recotunends that the preliminary plat be revised to indicate an additional seven feet of right-of-way along the north side of Valley Vier+ Road. All structures along Valley view Road should maintain a 30 ft. minimum setback. Prior to final Plat, the developer and fee otarer must enter into an assessment a agreement with the City to cover their proportionate share of costs for the construction of Valley View Road. RECOMMENDATION Staff would recommend approval of t!re Planned Unit Development request with variances for lot size and zero lot line setbacks, a preliminary Plat of 24 acres into 60 single family lots and seven uutlots, and a rezoning from Rural to 111-9.5 for 24 acres subject to the following: A. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: 1. tiodify the preliminary plat to reflect seven additional feet of rig!tt-of-way along Valley View Road. 2.. Modify site plan to reflect 30 ft. building setbacks from the revised right-of-way along Valley View Road. ,1. Q. Prior to the final Plat, proponent shall: 1, provide slope stabilization, sewer, water, and drainage plans for review I;y the City Engineer. 2, Receive approval from the purgatory Creek Watershed nistrict for grading, drainage, erosion control and slopo stabilization plans. 3. Provide appropriate cascmCnts over existing serer and bike trails r•unniny through the project. 4. Obtain 2.44 acres of part: property fron the City. 5. D:vcluper and fee rn:ncr shall (-M.or into an asses,�rr:;:nt arp eery^ut. teitit C!je City to cover the costs of Construction of Uall 'y View Rnad. 6, pi-ovir!- o plan ,howin(l con tru tion li its -with oars to be by song fen.in.t to p + :c,v0 the trc+�5 Vruv i ,t. r, fare Cat ion pl•,n for the ri-pl� ��: .it u, to<ir.s and r s��ration of till" slci,m. l"� r C. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall: } 1. Pay the appropriate cash part: fee. 2. Notify the city and the Watershed District 48 hours prior to grading. 3. Provide color schemes for the exterior elevations for review. 4. Provide legal documents which address mutual easurants required by the zero lot line concept, placement of fences, hedges., on easements, maini:anence and use regulations for jointly owned garages, architectural controls relative to building additions and color treatments, and restrictions for outdoor storage of equipm;nnt and recreational vehicles. D. Construction of totiot and five-foot wide concrete sidekall, concurrent with Phase I. C. PRAIRIE Ki:OLL, by Hestia Hon.:.s, Inc. Reryuest. for Planned Unit Develop i 17 fi ei F!ev e,<r and Inning from Rural to R1--S.5, with variances, for , sinyle fr•atily resru.,ttial units and Preli:ainal"y' Plat of 24 acres into lots and outlots. Location: i?ortit,;;ist c.,,!tadrent of Valley Viergt Road 1 Edenvitle Boulevard. N continued public hearing. i Fir. Lj,yan f;uvrak, representing Hestia Homes, presented slides of the project sits He reviec,ed site charactl:l,istics and plan features for the proposed develcpIImL- Planner Franzen reviewed tfle finc{ings and recomilendations of the $taif Report r• May 11, 1934. is' Yi!arin+la e:alre!�sed conci:rll, regarding the location of garagca in the front of i.,, Y houses. Ile also stated thai. it di(; not anpcar as if there ::as racch o;;cn S,t available to the irrdivicival units t.hroughaut the project. Mr. Nowak respoac:: A that the location of the garages Was chosen i.o provide a variety of look to .t,,,, site. i?arhula a•l:ed if there eras enort;h rooar for turning space in the drivei,'ay sevcr,,1 of the ho+r, s. 1;r. iiowak responded that this could be utiti!,;,ted ill On i, drCitS ;ghere it leas a pl'OiilCil. Ilallet.i. a.k i hoc;• i,he Cit.v a;oulrl cvi.ormine a fair purchase pi ice fnr a.c es. of park So !c pul by file iirot,� n;:, staff er,l,l<•itr 1 that an a,pvlli, , c';onld bt^ of t:hi Clay pruY,vrty Co the pinponc:nF. Hlllr : a!Ict1 ii t.h;! 1. lt`y rcceivrd from thl ttur l .c arcmild hi: r:it111-wed to ir ,rot „ n in this vir.ntty. st•Itf rc poi' :i ttrtt Lhis to+rid be a te;tttrr ` tit. P:ak>, 1.;.:rc;':tll/n, awl :,ai.urrrl RCSptlt, ., Cot.i tssion to ha.titlle. Fialloit a :;od ii thr pre,j:cL v,oti1d I arn'kahi0 1tY,aut tho Perk P;_'11) ra jt:+l:{id that th^ site pliul ,pn itrcd to "tit. t.tl,. .,iii" brttCl. with th.. ;'4!i;io". park �•i!rn!tt:', 4:ed c,htt t-erv.-Ii-q of tiro nniti r•cl Il:lo;, t.h,, n `.t0l t t i:'iri:a.l.r r.t ti> i; iC Yrt1 �tlt( r, r of L;li` tit,LI 1 lJA_ 1. 5t i !'• 1 r. ,I `;i i i ;Irt ',`l ,I, ,zr'; ..I_I t•tYJ 1:1 l,c' d\..1 .` 1,' i. flit, c.1 1 t , t,i till tj 111, 11ldlillinc" co;oli--"sion Minutes 4 May 14, 1984 sev eral areasof the country and had been SUCCOSSfUl. Mr. rj,.-,!id Buwvr-, )SCOO Valley View Road, stated that he had several roncern, rocizirding tho 'fh0se included: 1) traffic on Valley View Rooil especially with l-(-;p,,ct to the single lane LrM'fic undorneath Graffiti env1rotw)-,nLa1 iiil!)oct Pul) the vjldjj"e within the area; 13) the unit type propos( and itN ill;-pOct upon the resajt; value of the surrounding properties in as V101 as tll(..' 1-12SIIIe POFS-k)'litiCs Of tilt, thoionselvei;; 4) ti ability of a "zero lot line" C0PccPt to vm'-V, t"ithin tho City of Edell Prairie; anr' (5) street lit,,liting and safety plans for i:he project. Mr. Tml13.s Pace, 15F,17 Valley Vices Rood, stated that he did not feel zt-;i t - varivariance; S11001d k'.' (!ranted for this sit( lie, st,-i 1.t'd that Scvr!rfl of tire. hot os iv 'Irc 1xperiencing f loodr!d bascrii.-ii"s d,.lriitq n the ixva it a,.iy , the v: t seasons of t!. year, and he olicstioned w"t"t'cT U'12ce 110W,,s could avoid t,-einq flooded due to th to tho %-,,o.Llmcj area to the north. r,"r. P(igf, also expresscri concol r. reqi-.irdirm the wildlife which vvild be disturbed by this, development. and as�I' %AiL tivv,�r .1 an envirvn;nental asses rnt %-,,orksheet %,:as required for this propor;'�" Staff reiliondrA that it v,,as not. Hir. Page Stated that his major C0nt;('%"1 ryaspotenti,,.I upgr-idit -)v.(A Valley VIeW' Road wojcjl vloulc: he required by this pro'-;(.11"I. Staff rc<poilded til,,t this 11"OPO', alone, wou I d not be rosponlihlC for require the llpg"radinq of valley View Road. It v.'as point-A out ti-"!: there vlaro. I projects ill process and recently completed al=�g Val-ICY View ROL d vAlich tile. Llpgri,,ding of the road. M,,. Judy Gringo, 15130 Croel:si6e Court, stated that she R10t tllcrf, Wl':s ton multiple &!voloprmt in this area, and that the small lots Of til pz-,,)jui:-L would not, aljoj enough (,,poll space fO!� future r-csidults of the area. ill jjiL opinion, the proj�'ct %M':- mx. Art Wo,,'4�s, INS9 Syc��i'iorc Co[irt, stated thilt, look 1 c"Itev if (N. vi('.'(! of the projo,,:t y!tqjd not be a I ine of jar, seen d- thc! ma i n ,;Lvoi�t to thc project iks' shown. iiB stated drat 112 felt th dotai-. aarvtqc,:s would tle n,orc 0r a ioaintcnauec bur(loli that; Mir. liorry Tre'-'ool" 153341 Coort, -!Presst^d conu-rri about 'clv: pt,k!m i trol-I k- incre't.;-, and On., harin 0:11, to l,,illjljIe due to this proil::Ct. City had re, i-,,,.�d Iliis- against the Cl Concv,-C,'Y oi� 1:S. 1�f f r,s p)i itIc d tie.t y 11'alI"d ti fol. a !A-Att, r ort roq xclinq til", llpfyl--dil,'! %'Alov the C i ty 11')d I ved prig' Jll'xy co I c i tvI I'A of V'�'I (-y for 111i, vill'wy Vk-'! !`:I.�d. 'S" Ru'ld, t" no:' -;'n-hu I'l. planning Cu,raission Minutes 5 May 14, 1984 i Mr. Nowak responded to srveral of the concerns discussed by the residents. t, stated that there would be cort;ion ownership of the varages and that they would l) maint.;ined throu;th scat of 1100M+ner•S, Association restrictions. The drivewa- w.ithout proper access r•+ould be revised. Regarding storm dater drainage, th engineers for t?;e project had desig!ied a syst�-,n which would work for the propert• and 00ch had be•.ri discussed with the City C-ngineers. Mr. Greg Frank, DICCo,sb1 I;nutson and Associates, engineer for proponent, reviewed the storm wit.cr draina,: and grading plan: for the property. Mr. Noiu-nk added that street lighting would II providing per City requirements and also stated that his project was not tL- single cause for the: required upgrading of Valley Vier. Road. MOTION: M,,)tion was made by harhula, seconded by Gartner, to continue the public hearing 1, the: Jun^ 11, 1981,` meeting fur resolution of the following concerns: maintenan{:_ of garzgfs, access to garages, the fund toward which nonics for the park land i. be purchased by proponent swill be used, and site drainage. tlotion carried-5-0-0 ' 9 I a. YItAI-IF KNOI.i., by Hestia 110111^s, Inc. Request for Planned Unit Revelapin°ni [ii tr tCt ICCVie19 and Zoning fromRural to R1-9.5, with variances, for single family residential units and preliminary Plat of 24 acres into Gt j lots ,zind outlots. Location: Northwest quadrant of Valley View Road aoi. Edenvale iloulcvard. A contitsueci puhlic hearing. At. the I•?ay 14, 1984, Planning Comnission meting, the Corimlission raised it stwnbc of concerns for' the proponent to consider and to try to work out with neighbor and the planning Staff. The Co;:rnissiort had also asked al,,out the ability of the City to sell any Hart 0„ 9 part pl operty to a private party. idr. Lvr bait, Director of Community Service., t had research;d the conditions of acquisition of the park property, and found Oct: there were no deed restrictions and that the property could he sold based upon a+. appraised fair market: vakle. Mr. Brian N;o:;ak, proponent, reviewed the amended site plan details as requested L•y the Planning Cos:nission at its I.9ay 14, 193^ mLeting. Sincc that tilre, .tda u>ntcx changes in tale design of the buildings and the long Uri)" maintenrnce of th1 . project had been made by the. Proponent. Planner Franzen revievred the findings and r•ecommmiations of the Staff Report o: Play 4, 1984, with the Planning Commission. { Chairman Beat'urn expressed concern regarc!in� th(! traffic along Valley View t?aad this till)^_. i!� stated that he felt it wouid ba important for tite City to b:agi. ungr diriq of this road as sons as possible, not: only for this Prnjoct, b.r esp^ci•'i ly for t.hc oxr lino re`;ic!eni s irr, tit.` surrounding area. Ciiairm n a aske" i t.!Ic Cantc,:l i prorcu:;,ii;; Progr:im recently discussed by the Cit Co,rtc had irrclilil"d th u;yr'r,rin, of V:tllay Pict: Roarl. Planner tl respolc!od th..f. r;;,s antic pat.d fcr co:epletioil in 19117. Mal-hi;ic, a t ` rittich variances rn:re hlti:rq requested by tho proponent. Pl •.m zero Franzen r, p,>>ricd that: i.hcy u,�,uld be sib int. lin: `:,rr-iances for thi, z lot ?il, cnnc.ept of t. itr'ojoct., rood frontacc"e' v,ri,ut,.e;, at)'! lot size variances. Hallcit ar.!,csi ho:, 11"n1+ acres cif open sp;c.e u•ret-e b:linq dedic;ted by the fcI i1,i r �� ,cc.t. P;��r' r^s;innd;�d Chit it. rrl:; a to' I of 8.4 +cr,s. Y1 tt 1u,,n,.t,i ont that, ul lu.'inq tit I,.+ s to he , Ilic,Yr ( for oprri s{' (k1 iiy fry• iki, lir;,j'ct ovorail 1oll1,' b rrr�.�; 1'et e t:. tJ ttliout the t{ dr't,iIy for t.hc prije'- vould 1, tills 11 :u:rc. r 1f, < < ,'.'r t f �It��•i It t, r`i'di r. i,r.It i`i1 It.`• , ,^; 1 1:.,11 11 ` �1, 1 l i' r ,'.l,a :•il i t r r 1. 11c l'ti , 111. 11.t + i,,'.fi h,i'.r 1; h(fl !7',•Ir 1+ 1. ::al�lr' L. !", d nl: ,I i-f.` is it -i i ,1 i• a , V. i o f ..., :.ii`,i. :, c. ,,! ,nrit c;,., r,n,,.;,-, 1 .rtt, .all-1 . i-,+ !'-• • .i1. Cti� 1 � : rn', s1 Vr.I?i:i Vi,:: I, ! t'.••. i . , . lagging Ca:nnission Minutes June lQ, 19f34 4 d 4+^ Mr.. Barry Treager, 153 4l. Creekside Court, stated that, currently, hevviould drive two miles out of his way in order to avoid traffic along Valley View Road du( to the severe backup during peak hour traffic periods. W. Cotrers added that he felt that the City should be aware that this entire accessed Valley view Road only, and that there were no alternative access project points for any of the proposed units in this project. The ConlTission discussed tile project in greater detail, including traffic, the number of variances requested, the zero lot line concept of the proposal, maintenance of the private facilities and structures, and density. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Gartner, to close the public hearing. 14otion carried-5-0-0 MOTION 2: Fiotion tans made by 1iarhula, seconded by Gartner, to recommend to the City Council denial of the request of liestia Homes for development of Prairie Knoll for 60 single family residential lots, based on the significant number of variances required on individual lots for lot size and frontage. r Lotion carried-3-2-0 (Gartner, Johannes, and AVarhula in favor; Chairman Bearman and Hallett against) The Co%nission discussed the project further, particularly with respect to variances, and asked Mr. Nowak if it would be possible to rearrange lot lines to rcdttce the nurr.er of ve.riances requested by U.- current design. Mr. I:owak statec' that he felt this could he aceortpl islWd. Mi)'.I ON 3: I'totiol} to Re;ons ider the previous Motion }qas made by Marhula, seconded by Gal•tle;. P";ttior carried•••-4-1-0 (Johr,unes against) foil<u}n stated that: IIP. felt there wore an Illor(llllate ntiitber of variances propast, fol' the prnjer,t. as, do:igncd. Thi Co:''nis,i;m continued discussion on i.he rnotion regarding the Plrnned Uni; Are('TtlY. .nt. District 1?evi(-':+ and zonLrxt for the Prairie. Knoll kvelopi�lent. !;il i 0Y. l: inn 'Ja5 14 i(' by ",fit h(Ili t`,:i)tl t,a by li::+'t.lh+" to 1".COvia-ictl Re t7,. Vol I'i;"In_ i Ihiit I)w+ ln,)»`nt. !lie.trirt. Rev! > �ttdllc..l . n. Y i,l' 0,ut I irt,wcifts to till, ,;?-9.S 1�1•,t1'1Ct t'• i ,,.,.i i �:•� lh, +i'i I 1 i�t 1iiC lta. I. Planning Commission Minutes 5 June 18, 1984 frontage, lot size, etc. Motion carried--5-0-0 140TION 5: Motion 4fas made by Marhula, seconded by Gartner, to recommend to the City Co+mcil approval of the request for Preliminary Plat of approximately 24 acres for single family developivnt kno.rn as Prairie Knoll by Hestia Bo:mes, based on written materials and plans dated 'Kay 4, 1984, revised m;-terials dated June 7, 19,14, subject to the recoarncndations of the Staff Report dated May 4, 1984, with the additional condition that the majority of the lots meet the R1-9.5 District requirements for frontage, lot size, etc. Motion carried--5-0-0 'i �'y J MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: June 29, 1984 SUBJECT: Supplementary Staff Report to the May 4, 1984 Planning Staff Report on Prairie Knoll There are several issues the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission rrust consider prior to making a recommendation to the City Council on the Prairie Knoll Development Proposal: a. Sale of parkland and public access to the City park b. The sidewalk system c. The private totlot SALE Or PARKLAND AND PUBLIC ACCESS TD PARK The first question the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission should ask is, "should the City be considering selling parkland for private development"? The developer presented that question to the City staff several months ago, and after re- viewing the potential park use of that portion of property, City staff indicated to the developer that the consideration of the City selling that property for development was not unreasonable. As long as the City has good public access to that portion of Edenvale Park,it may make sense to sell that property for a fair market value and use those funds to purchase parkland in another location that may be of more value to the City. The concept plan for the west side of the Edenvale Park area has always been merely to provide public trail access into that area and to some day develop wildlife blinds for nature observation, photography, etc. This could still be accomplished as long as good public access is privided to that portion of the park. The developer's initial proposal was to trade approximately 4.19 acres of private prop- erty to the City for 4.26 acres of what is now public property. City staff pointed out that of the property they were intending to trade, the City had 3.43 acres above the floodplain contour; whereas their property had 1.39 acres above the floodplain contour. The developer then resubmitted another proposal that reduced the amount of acreage requested from the City to 2..4 acres. Staff suouested that perhaps the clean- est way to acquire that property from the City would be for the City to have the prop- erty appraised and simply have the developer pay the appraised value of the property. The Community Services staff believe that it is feasible to develop a trail from the northern portion of this site northwesterly to Edenwood Drive. Staff feels that this nature trail would have a great deal of potential for several wildlife blinds for view- inq u cterfowl, as well as a variety of wildlife that are naturally abundant at the edcre of o marsh such as the Pun natnry Creek morsn in this location. The trail connecting Ldcn:u c;i give with tins development would mast likely he an aglimc trail with Somcr flo tin�r boardwalk extendinn to the blinds; however, the public trail access to this nat,lre trail n,u:,t he clearly defined and visihle to the general public and not just the re0dcnts of this neiollhorhuod. Ti it, comrunity Services staff recommend acce,.s to thi,� nature trail via a 5` concrete Sicir2walt: that would he located in Outlut 0 and Outloi 13. <<i 1 -2- SIDEWALK SYSTEM The Community Services staff concur with the Planning Staff Report in the need for a 5' concrete sidewalk on the north side of Trillium Drive from Valley View Road, north to Ontario Blvd.,and on the west side of Ontario Blvd. back down to Valley View Road. A 5' concrete sidewalk should also be on the north side of Franikin Court from Ontario Blvd. to the sidewalk through Outlot D. The sidewalk connecting Valley View Road to the nature trail in Edenvale Park should run from Valley View Road through Outlot B, north across Franklin Court, north and west through outlot B, along the rear lot lines of Lots 9 thru 12, [flock 3. The Community Services staff would also recommend that the trail easement between lots connecting Outlot B with Outlot D should be increased in width from 15' to 30', not only to reduce the impact of a public pathway between homes on private lots, but to provide adequate space for landscaping and defining a public trailway. Outlots B and D could remain in private ownership that are maintained by the Homeowner's Association; however, the pathway should be on a public easement to ensure public access to the City park. The City trails plan depicts a 5' concrete sidewalk on the north side of Valley View Road and an 8' asphalt bikeway on the south side of Valley View Road, from Dell Road easterly to Prairie Center Drive. The Community Services staff recommend that the developer be required to construct a 5' concrete sidewalk on the north side of Valley View Road. The north side of the concrete sidewalk should be 1' inside the expanded right-of-way as requested by the Planning Staff Report. The City Engineer has also requested that the area from the existing Valley View Road to and including the side- walk should be graded to the elevations proposed for the upgraded Valley View Road to ensure that this sidewalk and these lots will not have to be regraded in two to three years when Valley View Road is upgraded. PRIVATE TDTLOT The Planning Staff Report indicates that the proponent is providing a series of natural trails through the site which connect to a number of outlot areas in the City parks. The proponent has indicated that these pathways will be natural and will require only mowing and general lawn type maintenance. The proponent will also be constructing a totlot area on Outlot A at the beginning of Phase II.: The Planning Staff Report recommends that the totlot be fenced for safety purposes and that the details should be reviewed by the Community Services Director. Previously in this report, the Community Services staff are recommending a 5' concrete sidewalk in the location of one of the nature trails connecting to £denvale Park; how- ever-, the city staff does not have a Problem with allowing the other open space areas to be movred. Staff would point out that it is doubtful that after a time these areas will even he recognized as public pathways unless they are marked by vegetation land- etc. as pathways. the Comn,nnity Services staff are concerned over the con- figuration and size of the totlot and would suggest the developer consider relocating the totlot. >tructure.to Outlot G. Staff believes that a totlot s*ructure. developed in Outlol. A will provide a real nuisance for fUtUre residents of Lots 2 and 3 of Mock G due to the very limited size of the Outlot and the small lots. The (:onur„mitt' Service-, staff reco;;+^nand approval of the POP request subject to the } May 4, 19,134 Planning Staff Report aru( the June 28 19£34 C,an11junity Services Supplementary Report. lit.:u:d �'IJ),) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-I64 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and, WHEREAS, the proposal of St. Andrew Lutheran Church for expansion for a church use requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, 'BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: approximately 4.95 acres located at the northwest quadrant of Baker Road and Valley View Road be modified from Low and Medium Density Residential to Church. ADOPTED by the City Council .of Eden Prairie this day of 1984. Wolfgang H. enzel, ayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, Ma Merk -- STAFF REPORT TO- Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: June 8, 1984 PROJECT: St. Andrew Lutheran Church APPLICANT FEE N—HER: St. Andrew Lutheran Church REQUEST: Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density to Church on 4.95 acres, Site Plan Amendment on 3.75 acres to accommodate a church expansion of approximately 13,7DO square feet, and Zoning District Change from Low Density Residential to Public on 1.2 acres. Background IT I" In 1979, the Planning Commission :°` approved a request from St. Andrew w� 3'� � Lutheran Church to rezone 3.75 acres !�� 4 r ; of land from Rural to Public to build a 5,700 square foot church. Since the initial approval by the PlQPQ�ED SITE Planning Commission and building construction by the church, Baker SaN. Road has heen relocated to the J `�S southeast leaving approximately 1.2 92, R N1 R acres of vacant land. The church is I'^24� -2S 2.5 Hi in the process of purchasing this additional land area in order to R 25 meet minimal parking requirements �,92 for the church expansion. The I.MM--2.5� �:PUB _ Comprehensive Guide Plan identifies this 1.2 acre parcel for Low Density ,!` -Nit. 81-1 Residential. -1 �s RM-2.5 The site is located at the 228 j intersection of new Valley View Road „,� J OFC C•COMiJb and Ba6:er Road. An existing 5,700 square foot wood frank church is �� C , situated at the top of a south ;" W"' ,.IO T " ` 7�_.3J facing steep slope which is covered .. ylg5l� � by a numbf;r of elm and oak trees1,-_% a /OFC ranging in size between 10-22 inchfa I ( r T r � / in diameter. To the north of the Church is a small parking area, F- '"f-` � p�A T[OM NIA which is accessible by driveway off �1< ' L -,.,.a, ar• f St. Andrews Urive, _1��.� t \ \ l St. Andrew Church 2 June 8, 1984 Site Plan The Site Plan indicates a 13,700 square foot, two-story building addition to the southeast of the existing wood frame church. The building addition will be cut into the south-facing slope in a manner which retains the majority of the elm and oak trees. A twin 18-inch oak and twin elm tree will be lost as part of building and grading construction. The existing parking lot facility will be expanded to accommodate up to 185 parking spaces. Parkin For a church with a seating capacity of 400 seats, Code requires the provision of 134 parking spaces. The church is proposing a two-phase parking lot expansion to accomnodate up to 185 parking spaces. A total of 139 parking spaces will be provided within the existing parking lot and Phase I parking expansion. Phase II will provide an additional 46 spaces. The proponent is requesting parking setback variances from interior lot lines and from St. Andrews Drive. The interior setback variances are requested since the church is not platting the property at this time. The church has informed Staff that they are purchasing the 1.2 acre site over a five-year period and the seller will not agree to allow the parcels to be combined in such a manner that would subjugate their interest to those of the St. Andrews Church mortgages. The church has indicated, however, that they will agree to other appropriate legal means,. including conditions to insure the eventual combination of two parcels. The proponent is also requesting front yard parking setback variances. Current Code requirements for parking setback in the Public District would require a 50-foot front yard setback. The Code further permits, on corner lots, that one-half of one front yard could be used for parking, meaning a 25-foot setback would be permitted. Since a 25-foot setback is provided between the parking area and Baker Road, the proponent will be seeking a variance request from 50 feet to ten feet along St. Andreas Drive. During initial discussions with the proponent, Staff indicated that variances from normal setback requirements would he considered based upon the effectiveness of screening parking from public roads. The proponent intends to screen parking areas along Baker Road with a tyro-foot high berm and clusters of coniferous trees, some overstory vegetation, and shrubs. Staff feels that this screening plan is not adequate and would recomnend a combination of increased berm height to three feet and additional plantings. The proponent intends to screen parking areas along St. Andrews Drive with a combination of undcrstory shrub vegetation, which includes both deciduous and coniferous m.terials. Staff feels that deciduous shrubs will not effectively screen the parking areas. The landscape plan also indicates that some plantings will encrnich into the road right-of-Way. This right-of-way area should remain free of vegetation since it is necessary for snow storage space during the winter. Because thE� grad(, change bet;rcen the upper and lower parr,ing areas varies between a 4/1 to G/1 5•lope, Staff would recommend shifting the last-.r parking area 15 feet to the i south and 20 feet to the west: and that the developer maintain a 2/1 slope over a s; distance of 20 fret. This slope, though steep, is a relatively short distance and erosion could be controlled through seeding, sod,linii plantings, or a roeY, wall troatownt. The not effect of shifting tlik, parkinq lot area would provide a 25-foot se U}ack het,;ccn p;rrkinq areas and St. Andrews Drive. This would provide enough room to construct, a three-foot high berm. St. Andrew. Church 3 June 8, 1984 Phase I parking along the top of the ridge line will be visible from Baker Road. Staff would recommend coniferous plantings to screen this parking area. In addition, parking spaces in upper level Phase I are within ten feet of St. Andrews Drive. Staff feels that since the proponent is providing 51 more parking spaces than Code would require, that five parking spaces could be removed in this location. This would allow for a 25-foot setback and room for berming and planting to screen parking areas. Grading The majority of site grading is confined to the area of the proposed parking lot expansion for Phase I and Phase II. There will be some cut into the existing natural slope which separates the upper existing parking and lower parking area. Slopes along this grade separation vary between 4/1 and 6/1, which are gradual slopes. Some modification of the south-facing slope will occur; however, the majority of oak and elm trees will be retained. Storm water run-off will sheet drain across the expansion parking areas into catch basins located in the lower parking area adjacent to Baker Road. Water from these catch basins will be directed towards an existing storm sewer system in Baker Road. Li2htina The site plan identifies several lighting standards within the proposed parking areas. The proponent should provide details for Staff review. Staff recommends that the lighting standard not exceed 20 feet in height and be of a downcast luminar to direct light onto the parking areas and minimize glare off site. Access Existing access to this site is by driveway from St. Andrews Drive for the north parking area. The proponent is requesting a second two-way driving entrance on St. Andrews Drive, located approximately 125 feet back from the intersection with Baker Road. The proximity of this driveway access to Balser Road can be a traffic problem during peak hour conditions between the end of one church service and the beginning of another. potentially M5 vehicles could be departing this site at tile same time another 185 vehicles were arriving. During this time period, vehicle stacking along St. Andrews Drive can effectively block this driveway entrance for some time period. Though Staff expects that the majority of entering vehicles will bypass this entrance in favor of the northerly driveway entrance because of close proximity of parking to church entrance, there still remains the possiblity of a vehicle desiring a left-turn movement. During a left-turn and stop condition, vehicles may stack behind, and potentially onto, Baker Road since, there is stacking space for only six vehicles. This can pote.nliaily obslruC.t a free-flowing traffic movement on Baker Road. In addition, 125 feet between turning movements may not allow enough decision/reaction time frn• a vehicle turning into the lover parking area, without impacting follo,'J ng accelerating vehicles. Potential traffic imparts will occur on Sunday during off-peak hours for Baker Road and St. Andress Drivr. Appropriate spacing between Sunday services can also minimim th(I 0110unt of traffic arriving and depart.inq during the same time period at this inlersc:lion. C.on J dying the type of traffic impacts and potential for occco•rc1nr.r, Staff feel; that it would be desirable to make this driveway entrance an . out-only condition. I ;i St. Andrew Church 4 June 8, 1984 Architecture Building elevations indicate a continuation of the wood-frame construction, with wood siding as the predominant building material. The proponent will need a variance from the Board of Appeals to permit wood as the primary building material. Code currently permits wood trim not to exceed 25% of any building elevation. The proponent is seeking a height varinace request to allow a maximum building height up to 38 feet. Although the highest point on the building will be 52 feet above ground level, the 38-foot building height is based upon the definition of building height according to Chapter 11, which describes building height as a mean distance between the ground level and the maximum height of the building. The height of the existing building is 35 feet. Utilities The site is currently served by City sewer and water. There is a 24-inch water main through the site over which the City currently has an easement. The depth of the water main below ground is shallow and only a minimal amount of grading can occur over this line. There is also a highway easement running through the site in a diagonal fashion, which represents the alignment of Old Baker Road. The easement status was to remain on site until Baker Road improvements were completed. The easement does not prohibit the property owner from utilizing the area for parking purposes. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS # Staff would reconanend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low , Density Residential to Church on 4.95 acres, Site Plan Amendment on 3.75 acres to accommodate a church expansion of approximately 13,700 square feet, and Zoning District Change from Low Density Residential to Public on 1.2 acres subject to the following: 1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: n A. Modify the site plan to indicate a 25-foot minimum setback from parking areas to St. Andrews Drive. B. Modify the site plan to reflect an "out-only" condition for the { driveway proposed within 125 feet of the Baker Road intersection. C. Modify the landscape plan to provide for appropriate screening of parking areas along Baker Road and St. Andrews Drive through berming and planting materials. Plant materials shall be eliminated from the road right-of-way. Berm height along Baker Road and St. Andrews Drive frontages shall be increased to three feet, and plantings shall bc, added to enhance screening. Deciduous and coniferous s plantings shall be used for screening materials. } 2, Proponent shall obtain variances from the Board of Appeals for internal lot lines setback variances, front. yard setback variances from St. Andrews Drive, height variance to permit a maxinun 52-foot building height, and use of wood for, norr! than 25% of the exterior building material. t St. Andrew Church 5 June 8, 1984 3. Prior to Building permit issuance proponent shall: A. Submit detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plans for review_ by the City Engineer. Grading and erosion control plans shall reflect snow fencing at the edge of the grading limits and show methods of protection of the trees to remain on the site during the grading process. C. Provide details of lighting standards for Staff review. 0. Pay the required Cash Park fees. 4. Proponent shall Preliminary Plat the entire 4.59 acres into one lot within five years of date of approval of rezoning. Planning Cowission Minutes 6 June 18, 1984 �.d (Torjesen arrived at 9:30 p.m.) D. ST. AiIORI'! CHURCH. Regriest for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amend!n(mt from ) Lov fliici Px:liuni li:rr ity Residential to Church for 4.95 acres, Site Plan A`oendoa,nt for 3.75 acres for church expansion, and Zoning District Change from Rural to Public for 1.2 acres. Location: Northwest quadrant of Baiter Road and Valley Vier, Road. A public hearing. Mr. Lloyd Feryauist, architect for proponent, reviewed the site plan with the Planning Ca:eu.ission, pointing out the phasing for the project as proposed. He stated that while City Code did net require the amount of parking shown on the site plan, the church did not want to be caught short in the future and, therefore, was proposing the additional paring spaces to be constructed at this time. Future expansion for the project included 5,000 square feet of additional office spine to the port:incest side of the building. Planner Franzen reviewed the findings and recomnendit ions of the Staff Report for this project. He stated that 'there were two points of concern: 1) adequate screening of the parkinq areas;, 2) the proposed driveway access located approximately 150 feet nori:llvest of the intersection of St. Andrew Drive and Baker Road. Marhula expressed concern regarding the access closest to Baker Drive being located on the inside of a curve, which, he stated, is the least desirable situation for a:ICg1M Le sight distarr:e for motorists. He asked proponents if it would be possible to move the driveway to a better location for better sight distance. Plr. Fred fioisin.iton, 10334 Balsam Lane, a iw,1;`ler of the St. Andrew's Lutheran Church Building Ci: iiit.tes, stated that the lo;;er level parking area, which was the location of the: drivi,w,1` beiny di,cu:aed, r':ould not be built at this time. It v.,ou1d be hui it in the:• futt c!. Ho added that 'the church tiaould. be willing to he responsible for proper r-:onitorin<t of the drivc.:riy, and, at they request of the City, ar,r,ld rnc,':e an, :•a.`nr' s!t necess'jwy at such tirn2 the City felt it Vrould he l!i?cl t. l ton :+: cria ,cs in Lho access. Frn er„ur!,rle, Mr. Hoisington pointed out tiliit signa(le wo-Ild hr an efftxtivi` w'Ay of controll!ntl this access if necessary. I 01- i' i )tion ti;" s wide by ll.11lcU, seconded by Gartncr, to close the public hearing. `ctina carried-6•0-0 by HLI i ie 3,t, by rlu h,il Lo to the City council, irrt ( ';,;!V,n 11�) ` CL id,' I'l ill fr aw Lo.: atilt iie'dium (r i` i f „.i, �? �a Ci.�`� .n Far i�ti f to a.� rxpar,ti iw7 of `;1. Atr<1rhtrs -� t.i.iti i . .,11 t '.. •'t'.i. !�,. . -ti r.! !i, i!..,.<< �t.f`. 'i, 19. it `..li)gadtit`trS i:or!;itiea 1.ha1. the C.i'., L_ .ie'r,..'.r •, ni t i;!tr`r'..c:ti rr ni` lL. Ah;h''rK ,Y;., ,!:v! !',.,:��r ,,,�,.{, ''!d' i!, it,' .,ol, d` ._ , im], r<xluiro proixu!c!;t t;r mokle any l:" rr 1 k,t ',t'CC I�I!Jr;. ,..C.. .:!'}' i u; (-1, %J. w c! of LIw Wl rrm,-,Lioo. - Planning Commission Minutes 7 June 18, 1984 Motion carried-6-0-0 MOTI0.1 3: Motion was made. by IlalleLt, seconded by Mkwhula, to recommiond to the City Council approval of the req::est for Zoning Uistrict Change from Rural to Public: for 1.2 acres and Site. Plan Amtndtn^nt for 3.75 acres for the expansion of St. Andrew Lutheran Church, based on plans dated May C, 198!, subject to the reconfnendatiors of thu Staff Report dated ,lure 8, 1934, with the additiaial condition that the City monitor t!ro driveway access point closest to the intersection of St. Andrews Drive and baker Road, and, in its sole discretion, require proponent to make any controlled access changes necessary for the safe use of the intersection. Motion carried••-6-0-0 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 10WIE:PIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #84-165 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIFIINARY PLAT OF KURVERS ADDITION FOR ET Al.. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie_ City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat, of Kurvers Addition for Franklin J. Kurvers, Melvin Kurvers, and Rosemarie Smith, dated April 13, 1984, consisting of 2.0 acres into five single family resid:,ntial lots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, arrd amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of 1984. { Tiolfgauy Ei. Fenzel, Mayor ATTEST: lra,ic, City Clerk —� r4. 1�_ ti STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Stephen Sullivan, Assistant Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: June Q, 1984 PROJECT: Kurver Addition LOCATION: East. of Highway #101 and South of Rymarland Camp 2nd Addition APPLICANT & FEE OWNERS: Frank Kurvers, Melvin Kurvers, Rosemarie Smith t nn EST: Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 and Preliminary Plat of 2.0 acres into five single family residential lots. Background 4 IL — -- (� ` The property is a part of the yYr a original Camp Rymarland plat. The Guide Plar designates the parcel as V ow Density Residential. The cur- rent zoning is Rural. Existing Site Characteristics �D0, The parcel is bordered to the north r' h a` t�!pR0POSED SITE and east by R1-13.5 lots. South of the parcel is a 1.5 acre Rural lot. /✓ Highway #101 lies along the west boundary of the property. r1 : The parcel drains from the east to i-If'i5/ 81-15 .� west along 10-20Z slopes to an 1-- RI-13.5 existing 24-inch culvert. f i Maple and basswood cover a majority .' 145 of tho site. Sic;nificant troes will 81-15 I-GEN be lost with the grading of the r .' road, cui-de-sac, and individual / RM-6.' s house pads. A majority of the veg.tItinn will be . saved with development. The cxist.inq soils are conducive for development. Nil A. _ Kurver Addition 2 June 8, 1984 ,inonce Requirements The proposal meets City Code requirements, except for maximum length of cul-de-sac. The density is 2.5 units per acre. Site Plan Access to the property is from Debbie Lane. Debbie Lane is not continued to the west tying to Highway #101. The highway is subject to limited access and currently the Kristie Lane and Highway t101 intersection exists only 360 feet north of the parcel. The cul-de-sac length for Debbie Lane as proposed would be 840 feet. The plat indicates seven feet of right-of-way to be added to the existing 66-foot right- of-way along Highway #101. The grading plan indicates grading for the road. Grading of the house pads will occur with the building of individual homes. Some additional grading is shown allowing for a house pad on Lot 3. The City policy for driveway slopes is a 12% maximum. Minimum grading is proposed along Highway #101 thus preserving the existing vegetative buffer to the proposed homes. Water and sanitary sewer will tie to the existing mains along Debbie Lane. Storm water will be caught within a catch basin located in the cul-de-sac tying to an 'sting 24-inch culvert on the west property line. STAFF RF.COMMIE,I OAT IONS The Planning Staff recommends approval for Zoning District Change and Preliminary Plat subject to the following: 1. Prior to Final Plat, the proponent shall: A. Dedicate to the City the seven feet of additional right-of-way along Highway #101. B. Receive Watershed District approval. C. Submit detailed plans to Engineering Department with regards to water, storm and sanitary sewer. 2. Prior to Building permit, the proponent shall: A. Pay appropriate Cash Park Fee. E° ;1 C. KU!t U' S_ ADDITIO(1, by Franklin J. Kurvers. Request for Zoning District Ciiari.e fio anal to 11,1-13.5 and Preliminary Plat of 2.0 acres into five single fa:;)ily res'iarrtiai lots. Location: i"as1: of }f'iclri;a.y ;F101, rlorth of Autumn Woods, Soui:h of R•ymlarland Camp. A public hearing. Mr. Ron Krurtler, representing proponent., rev ievred the proposed plat with the Planning Co?,nission. °1 Planner Franzen reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report of June 8, 1934. Chairman D^arman asked for coai.nents and questions from members of the andiencc. There wore none. tIOfION l: Mot loll V.;,s ru de by G<.rl.ner, seconded by Joh;;n;t.^5, to tite public hearing. Rotio;r carriod__5-0_0 SO Ifli7 F+otil+n r+,tS ra.:d:: 1+y (gar t by Ioha;1n.�, to rec.�.rm�:;d to t.hc City COMIC 1 riv;,l n( 1:Irc r+'�+,+:ir�t. of Franklin J. f:urccr fcs: 7ur;inrl District Chnng,o from rur;ll to £a-13.`. for .'.0 !s, h,: wi pla;;; d,rtrii ,tune 4, 198.1, subject to tht! rrr i+kil , of t.h-r Silff dated Sxt:olidcd by ,htih I rrrs, to ri'co,. ,•n;! to the City ) ur.cil in J. Curu i iw "ri limm,n•y ['l„i. Of U disc:. • jn+'.I ! ¢� ih..., i _,in.. i iil its i', ;S.?.,I sir.+ 11„,..tlri. fa !•� i:en;n i1n' ;:)r�'rr t(r (�� JULY 10,1984 '16 MINNFSOTA DEPAP,TIIENT OF P/S MOTOR VEHICLE RFGISTRATION 14417 LYNDA OLSO., REFUND-Got-I, CLASSES 33.Oi 14418 IIEATHLR C051AN REFUND-BEGINNING ACTING 9.00 14419 WENDI' UlGtiiS CARI-SUtI SKATING IN51RUC1OR!FEES PAID fI4.7t 14420 OF REVENUE 1/2 01' JUNI: 84 ESTIMATE SALES TAX 6220.U,.' 14421 COIi•IISSl0!cR OF REVENUE MAY 84 SALES TAX, 12386.,,. 14422 FICGLYN7! I;A':;LRY EXPENSES-CPR CLASSES 29.6 14423 UNIIEC PtaCia_ SERVICE EQUIPMENT REPAIR-PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 33.fi'! 14424 CAPITOL CI11' DIS7R11:U1-ING CO WINE 303- 1.442.5 JOdNISO! PRO-(!li'.RS vF10LESA.LE LIQUOR LIQUOR 2811.f, 14426 PRIO;t ',l;;l CO WINE 738. 'I 14427 TWfN C11Y ININE CO WINE 1186.( 4 14423 QUALITY WIN` CO WINE. 120.' 14429 GRIGGS 000i"IR F, CO 1NC LIQUOR 3983.4 14430 FD F'liliJ.IPS 7, SCP;S CO LIQUOR 7424. 14431 FACLI I1NE CO WINE 1006.7`' 1 14432 I)Ail!% GIBi;S PACKET PFLIVF Y 65.f:. 14433 STALE OF I11114SOTA 13,111 REGISTRATIONS 96.G 1443,1 KFNPIRDS DRAIN TILE•-1'URi[SI;:Y DI'PT 56.1' 14435 FIINNESOI'A T11,AMSPORTATIO14 MUSEUM, EXPENSE~-d1fl'rlCHKTfdS PROGRA6i 30.(1 14436 'v'Ol f) OUT CHECK O.l': 1443? CHI`'IF) V.A HC HILD REFUND--ARCHEI;Y F, Lr.IS'ILI,l TIME PROGDAM 20 1443c. I RIiNK MAHONL.Y REFfI;!D-Ti:it;:S CJ_r, SF S 40 1r.n,;;J S,1'tAI; ;.L.'; RC!;GG RFFII?P 1',!I;ECI:I�S 1';;0^R,1Pi 10.;. 110 JEANN'IE STAI;;A RFFIHdD-V.'IM:TY PACK StC,?vFI, PROGI;AP: 37.0� � 1 t441 I iV MZA D'''IIGF_R RE'r u."''D-P,,i:RC '.' CI_f;SSI:S G. 14442 -M' M(,!J_UY FIGS M,C:FRI IN I'ltiL:-CufidUPlIfY SERVICES 385, 1 144,43 TAE TIPS CONCI.RT 1;4 IIARI C('llitINITY SERVICES 350.E 144-11 T'rIIN CI I'S/PUSICIANS UNION C06!CCRT IN PnL.. Ctk�.U?IIT1' SERVICES IS.;. 1 4 3 T!I1S11 F !,TIF CO*•'?'LR1 1N PARK CJ i!ilf tY SERVICES 250. i ra; L0, TO'1 PRAY LI;;t: IBC 171"LlailT CIl,; !:, f.0i, I,Ou:S 20.1 I=i4it 1 li M C 'IYPFi-2I1EBS--PC:'_ICE Dr P 1 2533.: 14l1; . illl. CIl:.�lil;Y L!P,;;. A'rrJldlilpl;-1'01-ICC. DEPT 66. f IAl4 i l l TT ', 'i i'?'S I C EXi'I_ SAS-IFUI VOLU FFI:R PROG2A"9 SG.0 ;� I;i 1'fF'LL1I'S 4 `.C"i LIQUO;t 478r.. ' 51 CAP1'IC?1 Cil`, 1)I_.1.,I' !TIC(.j CO I!li i:, 69i'. CO I'll 1I,E 1224. 1 .',3 Q!i:J.11Y !:'I'.': CO L1t?l!02 2i'03. 1 Co ! N!" 137• - 1•,i', 292;i. 1. i;1C S I I kT10NS 2:r. � l,;I ,v 1: .. I?1 i;I.:`-'�;1 i'?•I`�' CI_"f:c.LS 26-. :I ICI! Oi IS RII ;,) (:i ii:S 11U. .11l I 0/ ,/ -1 1�j h0,01! I OQ C! S. ) ' �il�il,' i-x;'j tii f'1;,1 ".,i) {l;IGl;fii'I 51, l"{I�' Clli1:'r��l �.1:151" PI C`•:; i � l,.:lf;, i! .i, 53. 14470 GREAT WEST LIFE INSURANCE CO PAYROLL. 6/22/84 4158.0: , 14471 P E R A PAYROLL 6/2?./S4 15861.5' , 14472 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK PAYROLL 6/22/84 3/ '.W 73 LABELLES LIFE JACKET VESTS-SUMMER PROGRAM 161 L;" p f•.+74 CIRCUS EXPLNSLS-TFFN VDLUNI'EER PR0GRAM 516.01 14475 F I A M DUES-FIRE DEPT 30.0,� 14476 CANDY FIEDLER REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 26.Oi' {" 14477 BILL ACKERMAN REFUND-RACQUETBALL LEAGUE 3.;;C 14478 XiET ARNOLD REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 26.0: 14479 SANDY ARNOLD REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES CANCELLED 6.0, `t 14480 VONNY I,, BAUNE REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES CANCELLED 26.t"- 14481 KATHY BOLINGER REFUND-•LXERCISE CLASSES CANCELLED 26.0` 14482 DANIEL CLEVE REFUND-SKATING CLASSES 4.5f> 14483 BED Y CLIFFORD REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES CANCELLED 6.O" 14484 JASON COHEN REFUND-SKATTNG CLASSES 3 r;t 14485 NICOLE DODGE REFUND-CREATIVE DRPI.IATICS 9•t'' 14486 KEL1Y EAGLE REFUND-SWIM-1IEG CLASSES 12.O:' 1114187 DAVID ELE REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES CANCELLED 26.0 14488 DLL ERRASTI REFUND-RACQUFIRALL LEAGUE CANCELLED 3.•''•' 14489 AM,AN'DA FALKUi1 REFUND-SKATING CLASSES CANCELLED 4.i 14490 ANDY CINDER REFLIND-RACQUL-TIIALL LEAGUE CANCELLED 3•`- 14491 CURT G0`E REFUND.RACQUETBALL LEAGUE CANCELLED 3•''` 14492 HFID1 JOHNSON REFUND-SWIi-IHIKG CLASSES CANCELLED 14.6 14493 ROGGIE JOIINSON f2FFUaD-SI!Ii;fdI.IC, CLASSES CANCELLED 14.t' 14494 PAT KENYON REFUtiD-Vf'R11IiTY FACK CANCELLED 40.I 14495 CAROLYN KLEINMAN REFUIII-POST N;iFAL CLASSES CA'CFLLED 24.t� 1419G D,NA LON`"XAN REFUND••S'CAIIttG CLASSES CANCELLED 4• 14497 DAVIit i''!ENrA;JT RF"FUrf)-VARIETY PACK. CANCELLED 40.': 193 SA DI t4C!dEjj" REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES CAN'CF"LLED 2E.t' 14499 JOkN fioi6ON REFUIND-SIUIE;41NG CL''SSES 24. 14500 KELLY !•'ORT0N REFLIND-VARIETY PACT( CAIlCEI.L.EO 1450J. CYNT;IIA hl;l i)'F RFFUNf)-S!,A1'Ii1G CLASSES C.ANCELLEfI 3•`' 14502 KAT!IiE ROSf:Ot RFFIlfd'i)-RP,CQ!ICTP;II.L LEAGUE CA NCELI.ED 3.1 14503 Iii!:1;3: RUD RFFUtI)••VARIIT}' PACK CANCELLED SO•.. 14501 T0`)U S;aL:^;: Ri:i a"1 >'dIE it,'i, CLASSES 12 14',.:;, LAURA SC1!fCNi;_!I REFiI,;;) .,.9It,+.It.(. CLASSES 14.' 14 50,6 VOIU 1 CUT ("lit . 14507 DAl'i: SCOTT RF.FU::D"RAC(1'IET1JAI_I. LEAGUE CANCELLED • I.4501; VOID (!;.IF CHF(J" C, 1?5C�[3 1',iii;'tt,l t SS_"ilti; REFi;Y:D L);G CISf: CLASSES CANCELLED 5•' i;Li1SSES 7 I'r.,i 1 1 fT 1, I ':=t,;E RFf l tip:?ll tI",; Ci ASSES 22. 3151.2 ill,t..;;;i dl:.,'!; Rc,tl'fi 1 , )Ili PrtK CAN'- -LED 13 1)i:i ia: �11.1.;'..riS R'cFI��!it•`:?,h1;:T1' I'(t,.l, CrIaCEI.I.EO 31 E 1/ 11 fti"' ;�'i1FSI RFf l i D ";1 14`15 ';r,::':_t. '::!I I TI: G11 U.0•L:;FRCISC FLAiSFS CANCELLED G. SEI;t'I C; T INhi_: �f!(�„ 51..1,:,15 '.;C VI':f 7�';)" CO h Pi i F-STEP!:T DEFT OfiItJ SUPP I!, G01. ?" { j7). .N;. SL!iV'LIL.S 14524 AIdC!tlCAlf RED CROSS 6 SETS SAILING MODULES-COMMUNITY SERVICES 30.(1 25 1111,25 AI R ICAN NATIONIAL BANK SERVICE 'G LI1CL I' Af1DEI;SE.N & ASSUC INC STREFI' SIGNS/WARNING SIGNS-PARK MAINT 172 3 I4527 APPE II:D R00!"IN(. SYSTEMS REPAIR ROOF-PARK MAINT 21Jb 4 TR 84 ALARM SYSTEM-SENIOR CENTER 103 '..' 14523 AR�Wt SECURITY INC 20.U' J. 5'l.9 LOL'I ARSONCAt.I.IGRAPIIY AI2Tl•lOi2K-006iF1UNITY SERVICES , 1152 AS!'LII D COFFEE CO INC CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-CON,"IUNITY CENTER 55154 (It I4+531 ASSOCIAf U ASPI!u-1 INC BLACKTOP 1453? ASSOi;1ATEp E CLL DRILLERS INC PIPE-PARK MAINTENANCE 30.t 14533 ASSOY M-1) N INSTRUCTOR/EY.ERCISE CLASSES/FEES PAID 1444.11 14534 Mill"1Wl) INTNL INC STRINGCL-E1 [t.,l NT MAINTENANCE : 14535 fi R l•1 INC -SERV]C.E-EDEi•; ROAD/ANUERSO!J LAKES PARKWAY/ 6G60U + -SHADY OAT( ROAD & FLYING CLOUD DRIVE/ PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 30 (- 14536 JIM RESMEN SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID ISO.' 1 537 DENTS fIILl.til'EP, SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEL'S PAID G5.! 14538 BILL. GLAKF PULLEF PROOF VLSI-PULICF DEPT 34E.(' y 1 539 CIii OF t!O MNCTON APRIL 84 It1POUHO SERVICE IlIhtllTf.S-PART: F I:CC COti1,1ISSION FIEEiING SIX 14 5li0 LOTS P,0 I MlElt 145 111 GLINT I)0I rCi,l_Y SOFTBALL FOR UPFN Al./FEES 225.( 1•54? LEE bR,% D7 SUF'IL'Al1. 01 i'ICl/U./i'EFS PAID 300E 11543 IP r & CMs INC st"imcC-DUCT: LAKE TRAIL 2 G001:ChS!:S-:lUIL1)i^1 & ASSISfAT MANAGER 44F,," 14514 MUST Fcc FUINT'll)RF INC fi 1,1515 Ptdil_ GEl>S[: CANOc INSTRt;CT01t/FEES PAID 36.1 14�i�G I li1�I,i I,tit `,!nn,), Sf)PPLILS-1 IQ11(}it STORES �& r 1r i'+J Ch1)Ci, t!)+f i ;I'll)I� CARRO',I DIOx IDI t ":'I'FR DCPI' 11+ 79. 548, (i it f,0 PAINT PAINT-CCI;,:�I MIL1_ HOUSE ME �•l9 S,nFSClti R CHILD C01JDLViiiATIMI FLL-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 183.` idC,!)U Cil+1'Ic1 P,II' 1`�iilrf, CO LEGAL ADS 97._ 115`.11 Cllll'C!I ° �I d1lf1 fiLP:2ICSVII.1_f{ TNf. tIRA(:;SET & 11-,10INT••FQUII'iiCNT hIAI1JTEtJAiJCE 2039.' 1455? fl ` IS,i( iR {!' 1t r;I;SiOitT,�•TIO;J SERVICE-PR1 I2IL r.f_f-TER i)ItIVE 970. 1!155z f.ui;11!tJf 11' i3,'�1 Cf. cf-I;ILR INSTRUCTOR/i.kCRCISI. CLASSES/FEES PAID 11. PUl I C t DEPT r I�?`5 l.?JLE PI lt?, lli;i'/11J1' INC BU"+i F.S %FnPS !tAl"tR DE's'I Shy coQUIt.'�I ,� i.-I�AfEIt nrPT U,I�Lf;ERG IA Y CLIANll Stl SC1 d)'(fy CENTER L?<. ti n t;l I l i41 COSr{- I1�l ii It iIFP l t� #. ti/g 1 'c C'TtC SUP,! It o CENTER DP.p'E 1 l CC 3i� ! �rIt;IF. I4 14uJ !' 'IS s oi+ I' Ir. li+_i S PAID ?2 14!,:,•i ti it;: ;/I I!5 P t I D 1 1h',bU CM O i�h �, iI iil II. Nf 1,t1O-F41"All"IE CENTER Il':l f l'}t !i?illy MIAMI: hr +ii 1:11Y II:1f.T i li l- ]} I I .. •. .._i1 ! .. '•i. I �.i. Ili-{,1. ..(1 ll�_ 1-}(U' t)!.I f I I ��'. StJ'tjl(ci)lh,,A'ii.. •'T tI S,` II' OiI( ()'.D .'>�?'I:1!) �1• t, �!' 14574 DOUG EPSTEIN SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 100.0'1, 14575 FIRE IIKIRUCTORS ASSN OF MINN BOOK-FIRC DEPT 20.0(' I 76 FLOYD SECURITY 2ND QTR 84 ALARM SYSTEM-LIQUOR STORE 289.1/ 1 7 FORESTRY SUPI't.IERS INC PAINT-FORESTRY DEPT 109.01, 1 14578 FOX b1CCUL & muRPIiY 1983 AUDIT SERVICE 128315" 14579 GENERAL C01'i'1UNICAi'IOHS INC RADIO REPAIR & PARTS 817:b': 14580 G1XF.RAt. FILTER CO 2 SLUDGE SCRAPER ROLLERS-WATER DEPT 980.0;� 14531 GLIDDLN PAINT PAINT.PARK MAINTENANCE 242.80 14582 GUNNAR H.ECTRIC CO INC REPAIR AIR C00ITIONER-CITY HALL 371.46 14583 MACH CO LAB SUPPLIES•-14ATER DEPT 68.91,' 14584 JoIIN R fiALLFT EASE t1ENT-COt1tITY ROAD ONE BIKE TRAIL 113.0;t 14585 Hl!Rt1041 GLASS TINTED WINDSHIELD-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 182.6!( 14586 KARIN HARRIS INSTRUCTOR/EXERCISE CLASSES/FEES PAID 748.00 14587 HAYDEN HUkPHY EQUIPMINT CO MUFFLER FOR JACK HAtIMER-EQUIPPtENT IIAINT 131.7! 114�83 LARRY 11iAYLE SO`•TDALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 200.0,� 14589 HEt;lIEPL'! COOP SEED EXCHANGE FERTILIZER-COP`i'1UtIITY SERVICES 222.4'.i 1459Ct Hirt!"Li'T" CCUNIY MAY 84 iW%RD OF PRISONERS 8798.5':' 14591 Hr;W1 CTY-SHCRIFFS DEPT MAY 84 1100KING FEE 114.li� 14592 hEitlT/',GF. 19 L'!IIN`; PRINTING-POLICF DEPT 27.0', 14593 111 F1 SOJIti) ELECTRONICS 2 MEGAPHONES-LIFE GUARD 257.0, 14594 KIER J(1;iS REFUN5-17RACT: & FIELD PROGRAM 5.0i:! 14595 1;"dtY SCHEIZER REFUiID-EXL-RCISI: CLASSES CANCELLED 6.0,' 14596 SUSAN S111c REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES CANCELLED 6.(h 14597 HE(:h;Y PLO'.•,r BAN HAH;i TENNIS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 1452.0; 14593 IPIS`IY PRINi's POSTERS & FLYERS FOR ICE CREN-1 SOCIAL-C/S 16.6 14S59 IIC-IDAY 11RIidT1NG & SUPPLY PRII-ITLD REVISED CODE BOOKS 2585.101, Iv_G00 HCr1I:'iITLL JUN-AUG 84 ALARO SERVICLi"LIQUOR STORE 355.:-` -91 it PE", AL INC HOSE C'LAIT S/[>OLTS & NUTS-I-LATER DEPT 432 11' ;2 IL.,,.F{i;;)C-NT SCN00L DIST ii272 BUTI_DIiIG RENTAL FOR CO °UINITY ED 22 6 ` 1,1603 Vl:!iINOl,! R 1%,HAN1 REFUIND-BUILDI`;G PLRMIT 200.(' 14604 Xl OFFICE Pi,CDUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLE'S 105.0` i.605 t',C,tflTHY 1111C4:SON INSTRUCTOR/DOE OnFDIENCE 11 CI-ASS/FEES PO 125.ri�' 14610C, tiiCll r_!. JF.Ci'.SON I[Is:IRUCTOR/DOG Or"�ED1INCE CLASS/FEES PAID 63.r � _4507 Jr!; �)Ft ICE: PNO011CTS CO UFFIi;L 5Gi'Pt_It_S 8•�' �:f08 PRINTI--POLICE DEPT 13.!'. ;IbOS) F;(?':,1LR 0.i ;iG�itlSON EXPENSES-FIRE: GCP'T 1.39.i 1.`G10 KAi'i;!; COI;P EVIDENCE: S--POLICE DEPT ;,,..., ,. < rvC , „LI!,1",, -� Orl lCil� ,'i"I PALD 70.(': 613 IU_II�C;Sf.,'; LI_I'J'1'�' S!IO!' INSTRL'CiOR/CXF(%fSI: CLASSES/T'EES PAID 763.�: 61.,i GEC:'CG; S:}'�',"ii SATLTP,n 1N;STi;t CIir'/FEES PAID 96.C. :615 i IiJC dl6 J .,,1 I:GY:�IOf 1hS; N'1ll-i:f:6t; 90.. . II, tAINT :I.l f./ JULY ;f CY.Pt.t:`S(:S 200., :ol: t....,'i Slll'?LTi:`•-tIRUOi; `iTOi;E` G;; , ;`;Ott LTD MAY ti I LfFti. SLkVICf. T 1)i:r'I 1J,1 Y 6;l ^,!-/i i FS PA11) 60. `.:,IR!I !ILI'T 3.. 60 > 1 P;i CO.* .i':lITY S`f;V'ICF.S IJ' l. a i 14628 METRO ALARI.1 INC 3RD QTR 84 ALARM SYSTEM-P/H BLDG & POLICE 198.On 1Qr,29 PtETRO FUNl- co.,.1 INC PAGER RENTAL 70.25 q 0 METRO PRiNrING INC LEITERHEAD & ENVELOPES-ANIMAL CONTROL 99.00 14631 METROP01.11AN FIRE EQUIP CO C1011CALS-FIRE DEPT 50.0U 14632 KAREN 1•11ICHAEL MILEAGE 69.00 14633 MIDLAND PROW11CFS CO CONCFSSIOti STAND SUPPLIES-00*1UNITY CENTER 788.30 14634 mim-)t:ST ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP 454.11 14635 NPLS STAR 8: 1NI3U:;t' CO E14PLOY1111IT AUS-PART, PLANNING 141.O0 14636 MINNESOTA DAILY EMPLOYMENT AD-CO?1,'4UNI1*Y SERVICES 32.51) 14637 MINNESOIA Gx'= CO SERVICE 4005.31 14638 111I111INK.SOTA PLAYGROUNi) INC BRUSHES-CO14liU[IHTY CENTER 56.4 I 14639 HOPKINS POSFi!ASILR SENIOR CITIZENS NFIdSI_ETTERS 27.3i 14640 I,T Ni SOTA kFC & PARS: ASSN WOR'1011011 FOR SUMMER PLAKROU11"D LEADERS 74.25 14541 MItINFSOIA L[C & PARK, ASSOC SOFTBALL 7Cl1Rl;t';FNT FCC/FLES PAID 2125.0o 14612 MINt,ES01A SUCURO,'lN NEWSPAPERS IIJC AUS-LIQUOR STORES 109.20 11543 SUN NEV0,11Pf:RS EMPLOYhiENT AD-VARI: MAINTENANCE 74.75 14644 Nlt"'E OTA t?itudER CO COUPLER-P/S PUILDING, 6R.`'(1 14645 tIOTOit PART; "LI),V'CI: INC THREAD REPAIR Y.I7-EQUIP1.117I11 1`11AIN17ENANCE 33.3`i fi I464G 1•1O1'OROLA INC, RADIO EQUJPHI:H-h-POLICE DEPT 77D.C, I1,647 GRLG RY hilL1.1-ER SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 37.50 1464E NCR CORD SUPI LI'rS-COMalilh;lTl' CENTER 38.1( 14649 NATIWH Al_ FI i_ PROII'C'FI01 ASSOC BOOKS-FIRE. DEPT 93.0' 14650 DIAI;NE NE:')iiA'1 TkOPIIII_S--CO;,1f1H.NJTY SERVICES 29.11 1-'r651 J[RRY N1Lf:DH,-'t INSIRUCTOP/DUG 0`FDIEf:CE CLASSEWFEES PAID 285.0; y 14052 ND;'.Etd PRCi;!i(:TS IRC 6 RED LIGHTS-VOLICE DEPT 328.2: 14653 N0IZTIIE2i11 "A11 S POI:(:R CO SERVICE 4.2;' '"')4 NO.�TI;Ff SF,`t P(16,1LR CO SERVICE 28035 0I. 5 N3;'1!1!K +T71I' 11EI.1. IELEP;;0i:E CO SERVICE 1760.7. 1.*56 Il1SFR01 INC 43 LOC:�LRS-P/S CI71t.DING 2192.G' 14657 OCHS GI:ICb. k lI1_E CO CEP NT-PAR: 1',V1,JfdTEN11,NCE 24 19G52 HARRY A O:ZTIOFF SOFTBALL OFFICIALMEES PAID 26' 51, 1 .59 ,););tl, PANI'0 EXPLr,Sc$ 135.1 1 660 t 1 INI O " 6 111`,T1!-I,W" SOi t `I.1. OFFICIAI/ F ES PAID 1.00.0 i�Cibl 1111G1 F'_I,F.Z SOI:II? .1.1. OFFICII;;_IFF_LS PAID 237.',' I_IF III_°1: SO: OFFICIAL./FEES PAIL) 1.17...5 1 C0 ;II. I 11 il'J�S M1I1 f C.E 1;i.7 G1 (f ::1! [I 1't I ,y;)`! L^." P! t:0;it;i 1' Rff-;D O',r. BTI:E TRAIL 209.0 r,(, P ,'Ir Ul'.l ,L lI inX t t, ,:_RS 690.:: �. 6b I'�I41Ri' t' (�C Ct ';r;l' II,,: -CIICIR C liI„II' 1OHN9 LA1,1 SI;ELrf.R/ f)6 IU:711 C0.:;.: aI Fl CENII R 369 ._ 56111 h I:J I'At:1. Ill CIRIC INC -Itf l,(iR 1l.'HAlWST fAi;;RFPLACL. TIMER/INSTALL bRO.R' FXI I'St S ".- I .;li' PAID STATION J C0 )tl( I (.-l:', l ?if Ci-t;i:lt PRiVi, D I I P 14630 SHIELDED SALES REPAIR AIR CHISEL-FIRE DEPT 224.00 14b `- STEVEN R SINELL JULY EXPENSES 170.00 14v .. RICK, SITEK GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 1750.00 14633 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP BITS/SOCKET" 14RFNC,II/E•-7. OUT TOOL 14.37 14634 SRYDLRS D(:UG STORES INC SUPPLIES-SUG'l;l"LR PROGRAMS 17.65 14695 SDltTtf HENNI:PIN IIU1b1N SFRVICES 112 OF N 1934 FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION 2655.00 27..00 14606 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUli1LISli INC L'PIPLOY(4ENT AO-CONit4lINITY CENTER 192.4Ei 14637 SOII(H;IEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH IN 2 C LEGAL ADS & MAY & JUNE (IAPPENINGS 192.60 1408 SOUTHIlEST SlibtABAN PUBLISHING INC ADS•.LIQUOR STORES 250 00 14689 CRAIG STANTON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 11.50 14690 CG dISSIOlER 01' TRANSPORTATION BC');,-PARK PLANNING 150.00 14691 MONTY STUHLER SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 308.13 14692 SUrBgBANATIONAL BANK P1II.EAGEEGISLATIVE ACTION 14.25 14693 STEP HEN SULLIVANS 50.00 14694 SULLIVANS SEPVICES INC PUiiP TANK-RESEARCH ROAD 13.93 14695 TARGET STORES INC SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 139.50 14596 MARC LEWIS THIELHAN MILEAGE 93.69 1"697 TRTARCO ARTS & CRAFTSSUPPLIC.S••SU NER PROfRAMS 7E; 75 14598 LINIVFRSITY 0'.: mINNESOTA SCHOOL-A'SITERSSI�UEi'TPI 966.16 14639 VAN WATERS & ROGERS 160.40 Woo VAUGIINS INC FLAGS-CITY HALL 13.9C 141701 VIKING LABORATORIES INC CHFt•IICALS-009t+UNITY CENTER 113.90 14702 Di1VID 1'i fTE(20 SOFTBALL OFFICUIL/FEES PAID 62.50 14703 RE(iF(;C,; WAPNER MILEAGE 1487.60 14704 4!ATER PRODUCTS Co -F6112 1 1/2 It;CFI METERS/T'a'O 1 1/4 INCH METERS/PIPE-PARK MAINTIENANCE 1533.I1 1 VEAVER ELECTRIC SERVIC' CO iUNIrY CENTER 65 0! 1 ql vb SAttf1RA F IJFRTS JUN` rI1 I AGF 14,707 WES?SUF;7,L SUPPLY INC DRAIN Co`EP CC) il!P;ITY CENTER 1.OG ftPcSi(:AI-S•;';1T�t, 690.15 14'0.�o 4,ES"TER!', tILI�iIC mil. CO DEPT r� 1;709 JO[ ;!L"_Tk;OFI` SOFT:;AL1. OFFICIAL/FEES PAID SEP.V i CE 440.3;; 471.0 )CrA( Cole 39.411, 1;. 71 k' t G Co CN i'r ',LS..SI RL?.T I)i_PT �(1) I'' ,112 7l!_P,.T Gi= bHt;lE�.:;UTA It1C RUSIIRO« it k 3 C t�i` N VLIiICLES '.;rl' S7i:k'l.N C i)i1:;lii;try • IUth tiILEP:G'c SIiP(l i T_-D 2, C( C SLS o1 ;,:711 PIT "siS. T r REFU1 �.;;.L- c i til OeF.RBI;.LFD '.:1P1GS 1t SU(>t+l Is i i i I n T 12 ST/utl<<?/>�'+R Lit:iL t;Ull'ii rtT HAINT •.r.iu Sn r;,'••,, fall Cfi':ci: 1 11.1l,53 $334243.. July 10, 1984 Cash Disbursements by Fund number 10 Gcneral $169,158.38 11 Certificate of Indebt 4,730.00 15 L/S Prairie Village Mall 28,982.86 17 L/S Preserve 23,467.22 31 Park Acyuistion & Development 345.50 33 Utility Bund Fund 88.20 36 P/S & P/I-! Sond I-und 225.00 44 Utility Debt Fund 2.50 51 Improvement Construction Fund 33,901.77 73 I-later Fund 26,209.60 77 Scwcr Fund 85.87 81 Trust & Escrow Fund 526.28 87 Com.aunit:y pcve.lop Block Grant 79.70 90 Tax l:ncrewent Const Fund 46,440.71 TOTAL3 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. 84-166 A RESOLUTION FINDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR LEE DATA A PRIVATE ACTION, DOES NOT REQUIRE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of Eden Prairie did hold a hearing on April 19, 1984 to consider the expansion proposal of Lee Data; and, WHEREAS, said development is located on approximately 36 acres of land located east of Highway #169, west of Valley View Road, and south of W. 70th Street in Eden Prairie; and, WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on the Lee Data expansion proposal and did recommend approval of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet finding the project of no significant impact; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, that an Environmental Impact Statement is not necessary for the Lee Data expansion proposal, because the project is not a major action, does not have sgnificant environmental effects, and is not of more than local significance. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a Negative Declaration Notice shall be officially filed with the Minnesota Environmental Quality Council. ADOPTED this _ day of , 1984. Wolfgang H.Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Franc, City Clerk P r. I (flllod In by CU(1) 1011102 ' (EAW) 110TE TO %,I HrItton cCmmonts slwwld addross the accuracy and cmplotonoss of tho 1 [7,w Information, potontIAt Impacts that may warrant Inves1lgatIon awl/or tho nerd for an EIS. Sudl cc—lnts trust Ua sOxal I od to ttn�Roe pans lto to Govornmunt UnII (RGU) during tho ' 30 dny Ir,r Iod lot low lag not Ice of tea LAW f; avaI l obIl Ily In 1ho LQ3 f4anl for. Contact the LOU (G12/Z'i,v'195) or Ito GU to find uut whop the 30 day c•anmont period ands. t F INSINUCTIMS: wldallnas for assisting In completion of this worksheat mey bo obtal nod 'r from E�10. t'rovldo all Information which Is raesonahty accossttlo. Attach nfdltlonal sluots 11 nocessory. EX"LAIN ALL NAWERS. IToJoct Nam. Lee Data Corporate iicatlo(I_ ' n1� ''ioll r 2 Frrosor 0aus Cot:poratjon Contr_ct parson John i1ri:en71e Contact Parson F Addross .C.S� _1's;inn Address RQrQ Fdril Fr;ljt•jPE0ad Minnea)r•lj� P'PJ .E11SCajrie, f honu_F(,21 cl?i,-4I11!iA ('Iwne�fili Q�7�•2 8 Ai•• arojoct-Local Ion: )/.l •1 1/4 Srctlon�l Township -_Rr,ngel o. Couaty dame Hennetn'In Clty/Townshlp NanoFd(,n Prairin. b. Atttch onch of 1-0 foltowt19 to thoCOM: 1. n county mnp s:awlag iho Sanoral nroa of tho prgloct. 2. n copy(Ios) of USES 71/7 minulo, I:24,np0 sc..,lo mar or othor maps and dla)rc,ms or to,lr.l Pt los rhlch cloruIy Indlcatrr the sp)cIfIc boun- darrlos and toprgr.,.hy of 11!o jvgj :ct situ. I: 5. o slto plon ntho,dnq f'ry lo::nfton of slgnlflcont foaturos sttial as pro- po:od strurlar,,, rands, —I"')I of I1,x>i plrIn, u•)tlands, woIIs, otc. s: 4. 'nn misting Inn:( use map, and 11 nvnit;J,ln, n zoning mop of the Inim"d- t. Into Woo. J; 'p:,•.rribn t:t' h- ..J laojoet (chat will to fan,, not low ion.; It will hur {�roicr; consist" of a 7')X(l 'ls•gtrlrv.ft. offict, (shin. ('n to ;•n existing li; ' 1' fit j;' c iLiutn i huiIti)nI Gtl j 1C ,tit - it;. !1 p,Irl:ing ]� r., r:rl of .' a . ' l l:, i Dl n❑ tl I-Jth lhr. (r .tl , ,'r)Cd will taf. ,tiino%n.;)tcl;/ 7 hth, a;ith fu..:plction by the. Leased for EAW proparatlon: Kerlin;trd h Clt`• OL-W(11-Ptai);id"' Ituln 0 f, IL-3.038 M.1.6. Esflmnfod constrwA ton cost �_t,6nn,ono.no _ Total prolOct nruo (Enos) 16 itc. or iongth (miles) ' 4umbcr of rosldnnfiat rnits or cmm;rclal, Industr)ol, or Instltu- ✓r Clonal srtuero toot ngo_9rlf;,n l(1 tt� 1t•(lr(i:)inc l�t�n n� n ft (tntnl� •10 Nur,hur of ( { arking spaces 'ln1 �tall� (!];:,1? r ,l q(,r_Q7n cull; �tnt1111 eo,osod ( List all known local, stale anti federal pormlis/approvals/funding r,?gulrod: Lovol of Cnvnrnrnnnf Tvnn of At,nllrntinn Status redoral: j Local: city of Edell Prairie P.U.D. Amendment Pending Building Permit - -Not applied for 1later0hrd District llrt}Tershed • !!� Is On prmosod p-u).:;.t Inconsistent ■I�II any: - f' , u a, ,doptc>i land usa erdinancos7 a_, 1<i�Ycs.:; i b. .adoptod (:onpruhonsivo land use planst C.. local, state or federal resource management plans? .` ., 11 yes, explaln:. Uoscrlbo current and recent past land use and development _ , ,_......_. •-. -... ' an and near the site. The current land use suppart . an office%rlanufacturing building. The.acJjacent _land useS are mainly viarehouse/ma during facilities. Highway } 1i164 tics to the test of the project area. {A Approxlmniely what pnrcont of the slfo is in.each of the ff sing eatcgorleO 6 " (f'or eantr:,ros sl.'nlld totol 100% hoforo .ed altor construct ' 3 Ix+foro Affor - itnloro After_ rorest/Wr»ded 1j_S �D > llrhan vncont —aZ% _IlL¢ (landsC3pCd) Brush _Ji r__% Weiland (typos 3-1' Z5 2�% Gres-Amid % r_% iatl*?ry IOUs Sir f,r::" _z8 s � S crrpland f % othor(Slnclfy) f Slax Cho typo and locnilon of rolls on "0 slfo map. Glv., the SCS roll class))h G call types, if kn,,w,. Attached (1,0rial tl,10 �fII (kx,�, flu, silo conialn p:)at mils, sio:,p sl:;,ns, slnkholos, Ohllou I Ilr.>,?stonn ll }ornai Inns, r:nnf t ,.nl ls, or pry r , ,)ic ho;ar'ds7 j«,.� o��To E>a,laln: lho 1,ine !file creel l-lotodpiain is within the pirco l - and con(.tinr, so, peat :(iils. 1Le II-,:nrcl-in County Soil Survey iildicates�!1arsh nf' ix• I,rolu:rty. t, ,51 tu. S h. trdrtakJn',l'nln.�r,f�nvg. ...... .., ..i pay I•nri of th. 1,"! cl i„:r Irr l „• 11 sir1.l7 Id,nllit ..,,r b•..ly n,d app11, rybl, "Ink, rin.slll.otl. (-.I: �) l'inl' (:Ilr C,rrl, 1 . „tii- ,,ur !n thr I ,III sl+I+i to I() 111• (.itV fl i.,lcn „r I I11✓ Con!•. Fiin,: h;ile 0cvl: IS Chll,,.ified k D,scrlbn any physlcal alinratlon (o.g. dlkns, oxcnvntlnn, 1111, Strom diversion) i ul any drnlnaga systrwn, Inks, strn,rn, and/or wntinn<1. EstImato quantity of ` tnatorIAI to bo drudgnd and IndIcnto whoro slwalls wilt N) dtposltod. . The proposed expansiun will not: alter the existing drainage system to the adjacent ttetland. the project will tie into an existing stot-111 water system, it KIII lha prolocf roquiro an npprgx intIon of ground or surface wotnrT [m40 C_ Yn Explain (Indlcatu quantity and rourcol: ¢ `` •••• r� HIII file yrofoct affect-. 6• a. surfnco water quality (on or off the sl to)T b. groundwaler quality (on or off tho stio)? �) No C•�Yris- { C. groundwatLr lovuls in any wolfs (on or off the site)? no =Yost: j Explain both during and after consiructlon Including any dlschargos expocrA. Outing grading and construction surface water tail) collect sedimentation. y as a.result uf' the clisruptioil of the stable, soils and vegetation. Once the.. 1 landscaping is completed no preblehrs will result. G� what typo of vosio valor ireahnont wlI I be usod? a.. municipal __Indlvidunl (oirsilo) _ot:wr Describe iypo of iroalwnt system and amount treated In gallons/day. SMw loea- fton of norcmnlclpol systans on a stio cap and tho results of porcolatlon test If warranted. Indicnto If jwo•-ireatmant m:asures will be used. t ldast:e triter will tie into the existing sanitary sewer s;yst:om eventually being treated at the Blue t.ah( frcatnn.nt: plant. The total as,3lirit of"Wstelvater • generated by the entire developr',ent is 9,750 gallons per day. Doscrl7n nod Indlcatc on a site reap ilia provisions to control erosion and storm- , wnier run-off. InCtUda slzo and location of any rotentlon basins, and dlschargo pot nl(0. Attached Plan pC2 i R1II the pr,*l ct ganorato: t n. air polratlonl •• )tkQw 11a C. nol so7 d. odors? Exp(nin bolh xluring find cftor consiructlon, idantify dlsianm.; 113 nolso ;onsitivo land u•,-s, and goanitty and typo of nir pallutants. r Dining amsCruct)rnl rlruuud i1q.ticul,4cs and flr'�l t,'iI1 he omitted into the atmx'slftlu 11o) w trill bo q(•1 ratcir by trio construction at the following levels: i st,wdaltl. (fir t,ni:.e hi)xlnuni CiIA Rannc- : E(Pii w;:'nt At ti,)rhinc dt 2r_0 f':'Ct i Day Fight, scl-cpar 85--115 611-100 I :.O I10 LO 110 dozer 88-105 73-90 f OdiiA 65acA 50.TA 55dF,A motor grader 78-96 63-81 `.1 ,�.j"' D. ,cr1:.� ih• ty�� nnl n�:•.•:f of .�11:, +rite nn.lior hn:ar,tow, wmslo that wltt be .... .. . .. "•"r ,nnn•n Laf .n,f hv, rrrth.O n d lacat 6vt of dl•.p?s nl: �No do , a:. trill bo rirlinitod by the lo-o5oct. lk, i:ypo of solid t:aste.'s ' th"T i�;p all) t•.ith an orIietr h,rildillel. 1t011tilo picM1-Llps to ,1 11`0M i'> c:urren(ly heind evolu:fir,l. 4CO tun',;caI, qi -..nl'id ,:,•..1c ;;ill f,r ,cnn,r,r1;t1 by t110 cnt.iIT pvojreL. w';t MITI Ito fr(,toct Involvo: a. fish (r rlidllfu hnbltnt7To I b. a Taro, andnn,)-M, ti,reat:,nud o slxrclal concorn :poems? [z)tio r (nnlmals an.1/or• plants) ''"�•I- C, mavanont of ally rusidont ur migratory animals? !!o Yoy` Explaln (ldontify ;Ixxlos and d,scrluu Impact): �y Do any historical, nrchnoolo?Icnl or archlttr_turnt resources z 2 exist on or nnar the project :Ito? j.]1iu Ufos :.:..............:..... Explain (slow resourcos on a silo nap and dascribo impact): .Ir t Will ibo project enusn ti,o Impairment or dastruetlon of: I,_..}Yov n a. doslgnntod park, or rocrontlun aroas? L.]h•t._(•,,,...lYes,. b. prinvu or unigla for^tnndsl rl:.y. "MYr ;. C. ocologIcally sonsltivo aroas? r;Xrlti) ,,(„_jTo>;�� .. d. sconic Yle'vs and Yisfas? Yell'. f. o. other untqua resources (specify)? Explain: �tJ) Mhat roads will receive Increased traffic? (For ouch road Indicate the currant 5� al'orago sally trofi(c (1.D1) and lncrc so In ADT contribvtc+d by the-, prgJc+ct.) The estimated ADT for the entire project is 2700. Flying Cloud Drive and West 70fli Street will receive the majority of the 1 additional traffic volume. IT) Jro r4eeganio enorgy sources and ul-llittos now nvallable io service f Zo the f.ojuct? it not, want Wdlttonai utllitlos will be rNuirod? io C-3Ton List fix, lssuns as ld..,ntltlnd by "yes" answers nharo. DIscass t0tornativos and mitl— a nativo r„nsvras for tbeso 1ssu3s. 16. Sor:le a)c,lr of peat soils exist on tho 36 acre parcel IBa., The pro,,ecI, ;n•ca.is considered an abutting lot to a dcsigtiated shoreland . wlicr id i vdTject to 010 requi)isnmt of thr shorelancl code. The ' is .ullject to ci;.y review i1nd approval. 181). The scwl.hern edge of the property is e:iihin the Cline itile Crcek 100 year l flncuq+lair.. No 1'"ii-hill t!Ic floodpltiin. . 71a. Sedirocniotion run oil is a tc_u1C of <onl.rtctiotT an! I;o problems are ant.ic.ip,lird uncc, tho pro,71NA I S ccr.l,rlo(r anll landsc3piW1 iS itrpli „ranted. l4a,b,r,d. Air pollution, cdu>t , r.r+T.( , anrd crdiu•a ,ro a result of constl•uction and ,..... __ _. .__..Plop r,f__�h'.�_ rlTT1T1,'.T1104 nY L_':;;,;,,dn`•.0 MNVF pi PITA+. UNIT . 1 t....d.5' <,•:Pity Ol"I In„ 1 .:., -,1inn in1m.1 in t•,Js dn(t-"t I. it,,., and c(xrrci to it, L•.t u( . ,. i::, Lrtq • ,n l' ot,i of tha r.(i y.lnt,d t ,: t.vnllr.^In is nit .I.:., on1t!, n(Itclnl !(Ih J!•.it 11,uik,:, 11••t. .• - pain • t .f `( �,\ '• .l•1,..11� � \/,., i4 ram.,(`v, \ 1( ,)il �AY �.'�. -I nAy Olall'ff� r� ,I,. `t�r�• L,S t.l.i.1) f �)h„ (r1.L Va6r ( ��ql 1 � Sri 6 1•L 9�1 ( \ '�l� '/ �� .� ;II ll �-�t1 � �r 1� �- ' ` ,.1 l l IA )-.r•l`eu, � �. /. .' E, - J, .\\` ,��f'r�t 1` , ,1'c\; ( `: �` ,/. ''•t is •k t�h i lo\ ', , it Ln lot' ""I i'� ( 'w 1 c.r++�� 1 5��! �'\ �•-�"� 1. 1 ,\` `.. -\, ` )n\ �z�y s., ;•„ �� t WO, of �'� � " /' r��"� �;\ •` `fit (\\\,' \ .d\t� 1(.`r F�! 1 Ir S•b, s1 i �•-}~'� \y' � v� E�ZLx�a�..l; •.1 ��t:f)�, ' �t t•. � t �/1 I l � la_.e- - �1� - - l�o i j f10 •'F A(J�, , i ,,l'._ � `"•./ �� tsz, .( nl I i \I() �/ \ .�1`C` �� .J{'l.lJl...1J J�� `' \� �'.l(liFs �• �„ /Cl�'�..t-• ,F \\\ T�41\.•t C 11 C t.. ) \ t F �• i�- i •`"•t 5 �tnksn \�� i. r 4.%J 0pvw alk .,.,1„� .i 1,(. E �� ,��'a \� it � \�� , ,.I --Q :IK ;°•.r,,,., ~� ............. s :.,- ..._..i_. . �_-.-I � ----L_1 Sri;. �� •I, ;--- -�� ; ,cY K 1 1-2 7931, SOS . J1_2 r. �9•Iq (� i t`�1 tl� .tip.:,,—---- �: t'_•+• _�.,..___ ' ' �, � � ',,,,• tt f r b 1`z !z-! Y:, <• T a r ,rl /1 it-RFG Cam` '..�. 12 P!�•.F�'dl-!3 �'! �a: �1�;,1! .14 Aj to Y l / P C Ri l>i UE? r� t , ( ,t, \ - � l 1� _ _�..� _ I � •`__�_ Ott,. 31 r rm � , l� ,: �.,,••, �, �) 1, �l L� �%'�'.,L� �1t -1 ;i�y�..� 1 Vel ''• __r...�{...0 t \zl + + 'JW 1L. ... r ; '•,,, r ` yam. ! , ,,�gg .,r,.t.:.L:L,...-U.,,t".r .. ..il ..- �• '11 14, •�, 1 3 r �ti. It 5 � .3 3J?.�i ..r._ rt �r +fx.+ti -i ' '' ;i.. :� t L�� -';.•rf l , < • 111 1 .� � �,,U1. .��+ � ,'L .v�,� .. •.i"y'i'.(t �--Cl:,ll'1 � �_._...-.;.t�,:�.._;,. ....?t:..-%:•�_,._.. .�•, , n i ,:, , ,�• I 1:Alsi.11 1)1•.\\�, .:'ll 611«t.c Hr^r\ i `« 30 ye it 13. yl'I:I C.11 T3 ' 1'O. ��:�.. If .�. I.`•( j \\�t� \.i ..l , -�, (i 1 it .. I ._r �. � !, , f 1 y :.: t � _ t;t , 1.� ;r 1 -•.)� t Niy t:K co. IV caJOT� M!` 1 '; City Council Itinutes -6- May 1 1984 C. LIE DATA EXPANSION by Orus Corj!oration/Lee Pata. Request for Planned Unit Ucvrleim, nt bistrict, zoning and site plan r:mendmcnt to add 72,000 sq. ft. of office use t.o existing Lee Data building. Location, southeast quadrant of 70th Street and flying Cloud Drive. (Ordinance No. 30-84 - zoning) city i.anager Jullie said notice of this Public Nearing had been published and property rvners within the project vicinity had been notified. Pob 4;orthington, rxecutive Director of Governmental Affairs for Opus, spoke to the request. Director of Planning Eager said this request had been reviewed by the Planning co:maission at its Parch 26, 1984, n;eeting at which time it voted to recommend approval subject to the recosn+endatiuns included in the March 16, 1984, Staff Report. They have also promised to provide the City with proof of ownership of the Hanson parcel to demonstrate proof of parking. Enger noted that the plans before the Council are revised planst the landscaping has been strcngther: This request Was not reviewed by the Parks, Recreation & ir'atural Resources Com- mission. Penzel said he would request Staff to look into preparing a technical feasi- bility rrirort reoardina the relocation of West 70th Street. Dietz said the information ,:jhich the City now has regardinq the soils in that area is from a third party. John VcKr,nzie, project manager, said they have had soil boring- done but Have not teceive•d the recow.mr--ndations yet. He indicated there appears to he a viable route. hent.ley asked what Torj:osen and Fearrmn's objections to this request v.,ere at the Planning COIMDir,sion. Enger said Tot jesen was concerned about the lack of an overall plan for the Lee Data site ; Feari iin felt more comfortable with the site rsed in the r.,-,nyier r,nich Irad Lr-en proposed as the "Michelar:gelo Ga,rr,en' site. reiit.ley asked if a campus concapt was envisioned. clorLhing- t.on said it is felt that thcy Can au.on:n.r,dat:e the most ambitious plans and oi,iic.i'.tis ecow`:_h plans by utilizing the Hanson piece in Lee Dat.a's ea{anion. Tann;n ocprr,'.ed eoneern abtrut exl•andinq panting onto the existing v.00ded t:noll. orlrnc,ton c>.plai�:ed v:hat is planned for that particular area, Ennrr sL.,.:rd, u,inq slides. what is intcndod to he done. Tannen risked ghat fors t.l;c 1!.,rrs,:m pDrcc1 rrpuld !,c left in prior to deve,opment. He said it days not lord; +ti_rrrctive paw, Ilortiiinoton said they intend to create gore grrr�n on the site than there ;:r?scnt.ly is, T},ere was soree discarssion as to whoa dine to date and trio ttrt>r or not a land alteration permit for. Vvilt-ley �unnc�,tc�ct that this isc.ue he rcr.olved before ?nd !rr of the 0r'dinr,ncc and A,,o that sore sort of restoration of the silo tic, co'",'Ic.ted. ^ i°r.rre t.: rc nn car: cats fro,r. the <ruriicnce. City Council Minutes -7- flay 1, 1984 MOTION: Redpath moved seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 30-84. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to direct Staff to prepare an amendment to the Lee Data Developer's Agreement, incorporating the recownmen- dations of the. Planning Commission, the Planning Staff Report, and the comments of the City Council. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to reconsider the Consent Calendar and to amend item "B" to include preparation of plans and specifications sub•iect to the receipt of a 100o-- petition; and to readopt the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to direct Staff and the proponent, prior to 2nd Reading of the Ordinance, resolve the issue of the grading permit/ land alteration permit and that a restoration plan for the site be included. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to ask the developer to provide information necessary in regard to the technical feasibility for I•lest 70th Street; this information is to be provided prior to the 2nd Reading. Motion carried unanimously. Enger asked, as a point of clarification, if a 12' berm was ok. Council concurred that it was. : y E C, I I'1' PA TA L"Ptt WQ, b+' Oiaus Corhorat,irn({re Data. Request fur I {,nn:d ihtit Ue4(lt' =.li. 1)itIrict, Zoning and Site. Plan >, Offi(:C us. to Cr,isi.ing fu,tcnd L to <.(d I;. C,tf .(+. ft. o, Lee Uat.a bniiainq• Locatin, Sa'.ttimat Gaadrr,i}t of W. 70kh Street. and Flyin', Clou(I Dt-ivc. •n Public hc<uing. •�,J ��t'. li(,i) t�(}t i.It111fiiA(t, Diro..Ct•(11' of 111timllli(� and Pi1Vt 11�C'1 tall f�Jf.11t'� of (llul: cmvporalin, revie,'JCCl the' lli`Aury of t17C i(e l)a a )it'C�Jit't, Plan: for ('x;tmisintt Pr'ohoscd for t.hc vsit. Mr. John Ir:Y(:n at,`Crpus, Carps tic)n, rene';t i ti:, site cI r-.ct:ct'i'a.-ics and Clta'nt ions of the. lw t p od rxpansinn 1)1'n for Let Data. Pla'r,r.:r (lr(10i r+".'ic,;cd Hit! filiJings au(1 ri ceir:! n,'ation. of l.he Staff RCllrri. tilt; 1 r:it ',, 1J:4. HO. ,to itLtiltr.ti: that:, thtlr the. j it no tfl.^a'•1r:'ly #! anti t Inat ly !"poll, it 1',�tl I,_. + �..i e ,1 tt:;ll.irn of th of tit; r,o tfr', knell for ti1C ert(al ten o1 li. 7i)ih t. i+ i?ro t 1. .rc,'ti'; fot tl•t l;t)rlh po:'t.inn (4 Ulf, :.itr in th.' future ,ti. tLe tu','. ( e Il , •io!l, this t;aul; cli,aiu.;t,� �I,rn::ic,.,t; l) an::'half of the i;noll at. 1-it.' norl.heast cori}c�r Cis the silt:. ILt11:�L1. ;,. .. ! lu�;r mach of lltt! ;nriltJiat ,;,+°, itt'inq used a' tilt tir':e ' � -�3!,:: (t1 '`�i� L•u i it!tors ;•fr. ! �, , ,,t,,,,;,t r,' (�n i ;i ih.it a,; t n t.,;,t l U tl :;r (ti ,rov i,f,.A t(n thiSl' .I l)tt t.L11 1111 J� , lt ttdi Y 't „t. ilti- tit'l, iho I„tlPi:! r i'I of t i i'r',t ti;, :;t v t ',tt tof all C:4 , � 11, iil. 1.it �• i 1.' J't 1 ill' r ;t March ;!0, 191A is.kod why il 1113lix"I Unit. Im.c.ev"wy for this site. rlvv�t .tilted Ulilt the original Planned Unit W!Volql::,ct (lit! Ili)!: -,how a s(lo'll 0 foot office add i t i wl Therefore, it wos for I.t,(: DItil to hm,kil'o the Cw i�.s i oil and tll;: Coo:ic i I for revitiw of this Oxi),1w.Jon as I pl-opom-d and Illilt it. vwild !)e t-eqijil�d to he an ivii_iltbi-ont to the Ovigilwil Planned Unit. Ofn-i:Iop!'lollt Conccpt. Tntrjown OAK that he fAt a bull), as IW0jl0'.;Cd in the northeast corner of W site, which would ITO= a Wien of the MiSM9 knol I, Id appf-ar ill-L if ic i?.I, Ile (![test wl)t!Ei the lxod for rcnO.oval Of half of thc 1:11011. Ile slai.cd tjjajt area lot- proof of harking had 1)(1 C! c c tirvell (11) ShCI.qjl o!I i�ll adjdL(AIL )ol. 0 1 i c 11, wh i 1 tl:ld V th� c t of l reship ('if: Lc,- P"Ail, ww;, in Ili-, opillioll, lol-jesen stat,,,d t i;a 1- 110 felt tit(! 1-c"! 0:1ta 1)1,111,; f tit, eximw,iorl shou Ill be UW CIA NO P"WI to MW 110VU1, as I-(0 a�. the I o i id on v;h i ch the ckil rk,n t bu i I d i ng, \.,.is located. He stilted tililt by -,hcjwinlj only a 1wrtion of the expansion at this ti'lle, 1,11w.,iliq th;t Owl'o wmilcl be tjeQ-L for eXpiIIIIiOl-I in UIC fUCL:rl-', Lee I)atz, a pimoval p1ni-thy aywoml. He asked whcUwr an ov(,.rctll pl".,n avikijcJ)lc,. at this ths. Staff responded that an ovc-i-illl pl<ut IwIl liven shm,n to thc: si,a11, but had not been availablc for to dit., Mr, Um-thill'It.cm stated that in Mw original Planned Nit 1"'. 70th SLI'C""t had s1lown in the location whic.11 would r(-qllirI! elii:,Jlwition of half of the knoll at the rort.110,1%1: col-liel, of the site. IR Adved mat rafts was consistent with the approval of the ovol'Al in 1932. stcA.0 thilt 1w felt it, was importolt for the 111anllinq Co:11A,.:jm� to 111 for flittwo expollsion 0" tiro Lee D:fla he st,lt.!d tlh,!t I,,- i-o)IL the plan; for c.,:piillsion oil it pwco 1)y pi ll si. t ii in r,tc, and thit lie felt, even if tIlc ft-r innod 0 1 -11)1k, t,7 ..,A rill, elto il,jy 1,0.y ',).:CLII' to concept., JiS oj;J)O!,Od to an siWitt.ioll. Jett nut". tided iilM, hc fi!jj. 1.11il could act on the IVOJOrl: -ow-ocliA „lwtll. th,, of a pol ipw ny is, cmij a the i"wihnavi cormor or the sun. now 1'or oxl�II5Jon of 14. 7001 Strect I`y i.he Vnii i',,Mklp;:% i that. he I k:•It the t.WW; �,11, lu., d ill i 1w St cl; !�.,y,-wt ',It I f is i Z-111, to col('r C I I O,Wu,!!'; I o,;„;i•l i th,! I'\t 11. '/(Ill and r 'I,,: •I i irrl, v,,'I I j. r()j, filt(li,t, 1)1,iw; to k'!l oi !I,- I k. y, Il'! .,t al ."1 1 h he it id ir. t 11. '.)-y 1 I l :t 111i" t il'., for Ion flit, 1 ool office`ice, kki i Id in"j. it., 1 'It p In V.3 1 T i March 26, 1984 Planning Caur,issinn Minutes CO a facility. liallet.t. asked proponents it . t.i,c plans fnr e>:pansinn had hecn solidiliid, ill. t?orthir,gtor, rir..perndcd thai. Lhe plans e;cre not L,olitlified, and in fact, had bccu r.h,n;lcct several times ahCaety, ' Schack sti;tcd th,,t he a9r•ccd with oth:'r Co miss irncrs reyardicul the lack of Weer ;iL, of c:iny futurr. pi, at Lhis th Ne Stated future that Ire felt. the coj ns,inn coup; ,c.t, en the c>:pan and rcvtc plans for Lhe office purtiou of the exj:.t.incl facility ne:r, and ;r expansion plans at a Ow'! when Lee tt;rt.a plans Were more conclusive. Chairu;;rn pcarr,ian stated that the parking aria proposed for the cr.pansion tsas at least °.t0 fret fro,r thf: main huildinc{ cntranc.e, t1C ould also cxpr::>scd cor;ccrn for tt;` la`f-tir,ril 'L reran"clasked Which he visible from <:djacent sites. if they had coilsidemd structured pari;in) for the sitC. hn ilding Db . { turanre'addiiriurtal`lien{tranl<enstof0thet office bui'ldinyforhUbetter incorporated access to the expansion area of the ►,wsup lot. Chairman 3carmng stated that lie felt additional lan;lsc<',ping t ithin the existing par.ing lot: teould add grcaf.ly too tho visual inr, 'r act of thicit would hard-surfa<:ed <;rea, Nc su^gc`st<';l that paring islands, 1 he landl;; aPi.hatlnhe{felttLCelt{latatwouldthL willing tolwort-;owith't9tho response City in this matte-, ho;rcver, they t,ould not want to courprrnrrise their expansion needs. Johr'.ni;es st„ic.:{ that 1w had agreed lr Chairman Gearntan r}{9jr ilrso phip;.rli;lg of the existing b?,x':t.np ar'ca frith lancisceci;tr sugo,.stcci t.hat., at" with other huildinrts that. has{ been tore o e t.hc city, sr,1a' +?"lhod of Lrcal;ing up t.1w long, linear nature of lire building fro;:r vision along ;.'1u9 should be considered. 11'P.cn<n' Stated th,A ".1 , pru'ooir}` l �•lyV'Orcint irlcmtgn`tthr'Stten�tis t'• rcvi c; th landscap in r plus, ! stated that Lhis courl.s and h,tllf-sold, it Ow, rn. , i'' i 1Lc�and� wouldaid to lull Mate had bon a concern of the Cit in Lhe the ulcer of the r-ccrcat.ion :rcra aria, Lherefoit,, the p,n'kiny area, fros vision alnng lii.thtray ;li;S). 1i,r•;,,:en rcit:eratc;i concern for the lac1; of an overall p1a1r for hropuscd ;m:{ futni c expansion of i.he Lee Data :;it.c. 117rtc�; i fl,i 1,n tra•: by i'arhula, to close the {'ulrlic: h�arin!1• n (for j, ,'sir , tin•) end to t.h,t :.i,{:: { 1 :•hul;, :r.i •,; by il:,th'it.; a t' . c f r/ Planning Co,r.ais�iac Idiruites 9 March ?.G, 1934 City Council, approval of the request of Lee Data for Planned Unit Dive 1op;:I.^.nt Dis,trict and zoning and site plan amnndur;nt for expansion of the office portion of their builctiw.j by 72,000 sq. ft., based ctn Volans dated Mwch 22, lS),A, subjr:r,L to the rccw;;:nendations of the Staff GeporL dated M.+rch 23, 1954, with 'tile follur:ing ad:led carufit.ial: "proponents shall provide the City with proof of oc:ncr:hip for tilt- liarcel upon r:hich the future parking is proposed for t.hr. crpan c sionoeo { ata fac.iIi':y and prior to consideration of relocation of W. 70t1t Str•ce L." The commission acirc:ed that, in the Staff review of the landscape plan, Staff should take into consideration landscaping inel.hods and materials which r;ould proWiclinq for breaking up of the long, li'War nature of the face of the building, and jjich l-muld break up ttte cr,�:Ssivc nature of the hard-surfaced parkins lot. Planting isl;ill ds were recor;ceneWd in the existing harking lot. Staff stated that they could follow through Frith these recormrendations in review of the landscape plan. !Motion carried-4-2-0 (Chairman fscarman and Torjesen against) 1'ubruory 24, 1984 Ptr. Chris linger ## Director of I'1:ntuing I 8950 Fdc❑ i'rairie Road Eden Prairie, lliunc;ota 55344 Dear lir. Viip,cr: Opus Corporation, in bcPtalf of I,ec pata, requests amendmenLs to the existing PUD concept. Plzen and D<•velopment Agreenrc:nl (June 29, 1932) that arc in force on the l.ec i)ata properly at loth Strc et and i.Jying Cloud Drive. 7'hc purpose of the amcnd- lacnts is to alluw for a 24,4.50 square foot office addition to Lee Dat:a's existing 1leadqucrrter corTION. In 1932, Opus pur.cltasodthe 36 acre tract of Land in the southeast quacT-1lit of 70Lh Street and flying Clouci Drives and built a 240,000 square foot office/manufacturing fa(il.it. for Lue Data oil the property. Dcu-i. the public hcarin.g on tlr.rt Proposed facility, rep,rr c_nt.il:itc; of i.cc. Unta described the long range growth poU'nLi 1l of tho inchtstry that. the f ecility wns being dasigned to accon:inodate. They also c-%Plairlc•d that tcorr spr,ce vould he needed for future expansion if the positive pruvtir tr.C!nds of the industry conliuocd. In ziliticiparion of that growth, lei Datr nncft:l ed itc. Hanson ailto property' nr oth of it,: facility just in case the future- l;rac,+t.h envisioned by tho co!atwny could not be accutemoduted on its new 30 acre site. 6 I,ee Data [:finds .it lww requi,%,, ;:dditionil adninis;,rat.i.vo office space to accOnimo- dato its gt,nr!.11 nec,ln. In th.. rep,:nd, th._ corgvnly propo:.c; a 1no0cst. 24,4>0 . ryn,re f„c,l ;:ddit_i,,n to the o!itre portion of it :ir.tin'c, complex;, This hol:- 171111c wol)16 •.;tti::t - itr tired , for Ow i m,'diate future'. In flti• event m1Jit.ie>n..l nl:owth orcul: it Will. I'(' nccoru:rodatrd thrxty;li ,an orderly rxpansicrrr • R onto t.11(• 1!:a15oil proprrt.y• 1'vvc attachod n ropy e117 the currrnt ::iCc 1+1;111 for tile, Lev llnta l,roper'ty. Add f- tt Vv, Itt 11 +0 a cops of the• pt ,n f c p:r.nten plan which shows the le 't ion rf 11j, of ice additit 1 and i 1{ e ttc rile t•aY Pr Ling, and oleo c.r•I. will l re,s t rj, to try o-%motkllv the IJdc ,ft re, ee if Lhc rtcw 111,111 i:; tp,+ ovo,! a.: ❑n 21.•rl of tln xi-tt r, I.1 D i i rn and ��cl�, tit All cnv•nt. of th" i'col- . rt'tr, t i luildlni` tti,{. !•Se,• to ,/-. 45o 4qr:n•c foci.. ,lccar,linp, to e•u; ec.lcnlation•;, thr I,Co1 latrl:ir„ 11 l+rarid.d .ati..ty oltlin.itcc rcyuirr- Inc n!s for tit,'c I'a:1clr:i cr.:ul,lr>.. . a Mr. Chris 1,oger Pebrunry 24, 1984 Page Two We realize that the addition maximizes development on the north portion of the ex ti::c Site, and that certain comprnnns.�s iu terms of open space and parking bctbaeks Witt prrh.:,hs [hc• futurr m]ocation of West 70Lh Street arc beinl; proposed. ]however, Ll:e benefit;; of parkin„ convenience and improved building appearance from Lite ]lighw;:y 1.69 corridor cowpensate.s, in our opinion, for these compromises. 1n rtddiLion, Hie landscape plan for Lite expanr;ion attempts to softcu Lite edg,'s, enbance people space:,, anti organixe parking areas so as not to make them as i.m— posi.ug as Lhey would be otherwise. In all, we feel it's a good plau and hope You agree. It is our hope that they proposed amendments herein requested can be scheduled for early flannilig Commission a1Kl City Council review. Lee Data woule like to come,cocc construction in late April. or May. ]'lease advise me of any questions or further informational uceds you n:ay have regarding this proposal. Best regards, Robert A. Worthingto , AICP Director Planning and Governmental. Affairs RAW/ms MOMS' -11"TORICALS M N N E S OTA I April. 26, 1984 lis. Chris Digor 8 950 Edett Prairie road Eden Prairie, Mimmsota 55343 Dear Ms. Engor: RE: Lee Data Corporate licad(JUitUters Expansion NF,'�,, NW4, Sec. .1-2, T116, R22 llennepin County Mill Referral Pilo Number: 5-9.53 (PLEASE, Kt,1`Fk--T-O-—111-1-S'NTMP,*R IN ALL FUTURE COIRRUSPONDI-TZU) Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the above pro- ject. It il;is been YeVieWcd ))l'rS(Mt)t to responsibilities given the State USLOTiC PrC6C—Vlti011 Officer by the National ilh.;toric Preurvation Act of 1966 and the Procedure's of Lite National Advisory Council of Historic Preservation (36c".,R800). This review rovenis the location of no known sites of historic, archi- tuc7.111-aL, CIOLM.-Al, OrdMeOlogic;iI., or engineering sipificance within the aroa of the I)Y,,po:-.cd project. There are no sites in the project area whi.ch are on the P!ntlonnl Register or eligible for jiicJiiFi.on on the National and, therefore, none vldch.may be iiffccrekl by your propoti;kl A,,,nhi, tli;ink you for your pnrLicipa:.ion in this important effort to prcscivo Ainnc,sota'!; heritage. FrIdIcy Stave 111storic Pref-.C.1-vi itioll Officer f�nCl Lil:�i1��nrllcrlic l Quality Board lo0 Capitol Square Building 5 0 CCj(jl'Streel St. Pod,Minncsoto 55101 ._....._.__.:5 Phone j May 11, 19S4 Rr. Chris Enger 8950 Edcn Prairic Road Eden Prairic, W1 55343 RE: Environmental Assessment tr'orkshect (EAW) for Lee Data Corp. Headquarters Expansion Dear Mr. Enger: This letter ackno:,ledges receipt of the EAW for the above named project. The Environmental Rcviam Program rules at 6 t•1CAR 3.027 D. regerire that a press release containing notice of the EA','' availability be providact to at least one nawspap.ar of general circulation within tho area and that copies of the EAI; be distributed to all points on the EQ0 distribution list. hle presume that these requirements have been met. notice of the LAU availability will be published in the EQC Monitor oil play 21, 1984, The 30-day coi:lrnent period will begin on that day and will expire on June 20, 19424. If the decision on the need for an Environmental Imr,?,ct Statement (EIS) will he made by a body e:hich racets p.�riodieally, youl' decision must he made at yoar first ol:!ctilig It least 10 working days lat.cr, and 113 mare than 30 calendar ci,:ys later. 0therviise, your recision on the need for an c1S raust'b" made l:itilill ;ii 1,orking days of ta;e end of the. coement period (see 6 �1CAR 3.0�8 D.1.). In accord with 0 3.032, tin final clovcrrna^ni,a1 decision to grant a per'mi t or Oih:!1' ztpproYal r'.`r;Hll'Cr: t.0 COGI�il ill"C tiiC I?t'i?J",:L S11111 be until a Ilojativ dcclari�Lion or LIS adequacy d:tcrmicatioil h.1s bran rlade. Ple,',se contact me if 1,1y gne;t.ions arise about tilt- Environmental Review Prnce!ss. I!; ((,I') 116-P 3, or yor +lay dill toll fr^e by dialinq d!id as!:iln) fot' i In Hoard, Env i rollmr`!ttal Revio, pl•ogr;-Im, nviran:!rni.ai Griot: lu1 1, i May 17, BIN S a Mir. Chris Enger City of Eden Prairie 8950 E(san Prairic Road Eden Prairie, tiiratesota 55344 RE: Environr.!2ntal Assess;wmt Vorkshc�et Lee Pata Cerhor'at.e Il:�adquar:ers Expansion M12t!"o,)oIita.n CU:KiI ftelerral File No. 12069-1 Dear Mir. Engel,: At its it F ting f14 10, 19'84, the Co:!ncil considered the Emiron tal ssessr~ant titrrkshnet (CAW) for the Lee Data Crnperate headgtlartsrs expulsion, lh(: project, is \rit.hin the City"s planned scv r service area and the land use appears consistent with the 1Gcal corprohensive plan. The EA'.! at?pc,'urs accurate and cG:,<{tl(?te fc,~ th2 put'}toses of Crancil review find an en',irennr:nt,•a1 ir,:pact stav r:�ent is not needed insofar as Council policies and plans aro co„ccrne(t. At.t,ci,ed is ( ccpy of a latter front the Nietrope1itan Vaste Control CaTmission on this LAW, Sincerely, GCrald J. 15ascs their (JI:sb Cc. 7C7 `:uilard, Vjr„ Fnvironr::-ntal R.wicr; Section C�O ,hill i�� I� r;,!a��r, Cii:, Gt Fee:: Prairie lri lector of Etrgie:criu;, M":;CC i c. i:as, 11, Fi; ropGl i t<u; Cc.mci 1 Sta f f 4ii i.. ( tip j!r r ) ..,I -1{�.,.�6 •'�•i Vt,i.�i•)•. :L..'r�r 1 ..i;t>,_.i:�.Jc� �.:C�iirti..r a, ,t st. dune 4, 19^; Mr. Chris Enpr $450.Eder, Praii-ie Rar=;! Eden Prairie, t4irncota 55344 Dear fir. Enger: The iMinnesoLi i'ullution Control P'goncy (;iPfA) starf has rvvieared.the Environtn2.I.r,1 AsscssT t i.!or% ivmt (c 'J} for fha I.cc G La Corporate Eeaokltaa•ters F::pansion in Eden P,di ie and hss d i.i.ttneci trit iio:, ottr p,�r';pactive Ute project does not have the ,,'.tcml.131 i01' Slytiic`1Ci:nt envirUi!ta::llf.�I ctfCLi.S. the 5,Laff ha:7-,'.V('.r, does have crnr;r�,cuts in Vie areas of construction•-rtalnted air quality, noise and eater quality imparts. The stiff is cont:,.:rned illxA tire. inipata Ul<<t nnise and e fuaiLive dast (1 i ,io;rs e,ill h ve on rr^,tn•y sa7sit9 1 r, t�.c:rs. The city l sl'a.tTci 'risurc Lhii! Uic! I';ro;ios.r ia;;,iri•;;ni::: Control ,,: wurf.s to miti Batt) these impi.cLs, In ci :c+ ,r rti ,ii rit.ir,n ti ;tlllr ,iir h' t'euiiitgt.h(' usco'i and ) roc i i t t lrlo k r .Eric, to void a.n ativersc oil n:,;x L"verc.c I._o; o.. I I as t _qi a iri l a rom Lrui-.t ion c.urfc-w (re:;S.rictiing cru;�trtrr.i_irn io ri.lyLir I',outrs), pil'CA rn7c AN-6 }," iCul:;t:e fttyit.i';c i:htSt iissions Ix: i:epL Lu �, !:'-i�ii' r,n, i-tii,tt h:t".Sii>lc, j7uriil.ivi' r(�!..i. :r;•i��io;is fi,o,i cortnl.re;.tioil ['c:tivit''ias c.an h:: ,.uir:i"-,A h; i�_ :urCa s!w.h d' ch..ai'�ri!i�; o! •rd,r, urg:>i,ra <ir�ttinr! ur not _ .lc:i ire ;u'.•;I;rur� ..I n1 d.'��_'1n, i._ut ti 1}' ;j;:� .it•. cl�r..-rp „*trl l+�!tl t'o:d r,:.ii'!t c s:u, op,' ,t, t ;r.t ;i,;, ina p..t i of high tnmis, Fill icivr. dust: I cI .,;, ;ui ., 01:i:: i:.. in;,.r} ir.ti;:f inli 'ri: oVcr„11 erra::ion auirui Iil.ln Ior f;.gyp,., ... �,. �:.., ..,d r .•. Lu,.- .. -A ?•..L,•.ir: Mr. Chris Fnger Page Two - June 4, 1984 Specific erosion control measures that are to be used for this project are not identified in the IN, however, a portion of one project is subject to a permit from the Nine 14ile Crcck 'Watershed District rthich will address potential erosion and sedinwntotion in Nine Mile Creek. The city should ensure that the necessary measures are taken to minimize or eliminate any sedfimmtation of the Nine Mile Creek during construction. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the project. If you have any questions about these comments, please contact 11arlene Vojta of my staff at 612/296-7794. Sincerely, ^� Deborah R. Pile Director Office of Planning and Review U1:P:rj fit �J 55155 UF 15$' 296-1652 June 5, 1984 Chris 13%per 8950 F,&I, prairic Road Eden vrairic, MN Re: Leo DA" CM-PO"tc Expansion Enviromaental Worlcsbect 0"At'-') District 5 (--'dell Prairie — llell"P'll County) Dear Vr. Eiiger: -ja The Minnewta DePaTtIaLl't of Trimsportation (1.11)/VOT) I r coalplated a r(vvj(-w of Llw ,above rvf,Tvnced EIAV. ]cc c1c, not anticipate Llint the propor;etj project will adversely jp1p,,jet our transporLrition facilities. If yo,, require a0diLi.onal il'f0j:,,j.%tj0j, fror., !9n/POT, please collitilCt Carl 1101flAeut, Ti:anspor tat ion Plawd il, EngillcOy., aL our 1).i,sL:i,ct Office in Golden Valley, phone number (612) 545-3761. Sincerely, 6111_14z.cf, Meryl livide, 111^;lncr Office of E:lvi.rolll;leyltal Services STATE Or E T 0 IN! T U Q A L 2 S U 1"%C E 5 L,,;c-;-' I A`i V, BOX CMUNNIAL ormf LAUDING • ST. PAOL, MINNESOTA • 55155 DNIZ INFORMA710N (6 1 2)296-61.5 7 t ILL NO. Jane 14, 1934 Mr. Chris Dirler City of E-J(,.n Prairie 89SO Hen Prairie Mad Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 RE: 1-ce Data Corporation H-adquarters Expi.,osion Environmental Assessrnioot Workshect (UN) Daar Mr, Ender: The DepartlfwIll. of Hatural Resources (MR) has roviewed the above-referenced docunzmt and we of'!er the follm!ing couTonts for yuur consideration. In general, we do not expL(A that this project v.111 have sigriff icent adverse effects on natural rescurces. Impacts on wildlife habitat will be. minimal and wildlife wov(meat wi 11 not he significantly affected. The one co;icni-ri that vr haviv with the project is that the Efll! contains no descripticil of cro,Joll cnntrol to be jjnpicjvf-nU-.,d during construction. h eaut.e of the potential inr expcF,,-,d soi I to erode diming mislruci ion, we su,j,,jt,sL that y(II: require the developer to implc:,(:Ilt e,llpropriatt: ol.w ion Cw-,11-ol 111611". you for the opp'(1,11-1:11ity to reviow this pruject. sirlm-ely, ih:ir.as id. Ralcon Env ire I;uvicw Courdinztor K.ircil I hlor lo,gim Mv,-Aro Pon n-C TS, JULY 10. 1984 TO: City Council THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager FROM: Craig W. Dawson, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: Woodpile Regulations A resident has requested that the City Council enact an ordinance to regulate the size and location of woodpiles for aesthetic and public health and safety reasons. A recently-adopted ordinance from the City of Bloomington was included as a model. The resident also believed that it would be advantageous to establish such regulations now to insure aesthetic qualities and public health and safety as future development occurs. Outside storage of wood is a common practice in Eden Prairie. City staff conducted a widespread survey of outside storage in 1981. Staff viewed properties in 13 neighborhoods (both new and established) for outside storage of such items as firewood, boats, trailers, and inoperable vehicles. Firewood, the most numerous and widespread item, was observed in each of the 13 neighborhoods surveyed. More recent windshield surveys suggest that outside firewood storage is just as common and widespread as in 19B1. Few problems have been encountered in the City concerning firewood storage. Staff in the Planning, Building Inspections, and Community Services departments receive fewer than a dozen inquiries and/or complaints yearly on the subject. Surv_U of Other Communities: Regulations on firewood storage are not widespread in the metropoIiTan area. A staff survey conducted in 1981 revealed that ail of the cities contacted--Bloomington, Maple Grove, Minnetonka, Shakopee, and Woodbury--did not have ordinances for this storage. Bloomington, Edina, Maple Grove, Plymouth, St. Louis Park, and Woodbury were contacted in 1984; only Bloomington had adopted woodpile regulations. Inquiries to the Metropolitan Council databank resulted only in obtaining a model ordinance; there was no indication that any city had such regulations. A Zonin�c Issue or a Public_ Health Issue? Two ways of approaching firewood storage regulations appear to tie appropriate. One method is by zoning in a manner similar to that of the City of Bloomington. This approach specifies yard setbacks and/or prohibitions for storage; conditions under which wood may be stored in the open or must be stored in an enclosure; whether the woodpile may be stored flush with the ground or must be raised off the ground; etc. Zoning can incnrporate standards to accomplish aesthetic objectives as well as those of public health and safety. Enforcement would be handled by zoning administration personnel. Regulations regarding public nuisances and public. health and safety offer an alternative to zoning. Woodpiles can be a fire or safety hazard if the wood is improperly stacked. They may also be a place for the incubation and transmisson of disease (e.9., Dutch Elm). They can provide a home to rodents and vermin. should these conditions be present, the City could direct that the problem he romrdied or the wood be removed at the expense of the property owner. Fircr-:ood stor•agn could be handled on a case-by-case basis and could be incorporated into the inspection routine of Forestry division personnel. Bloomington's Experience with Regulations: Bloomington adopted its ordinance in September 1983 and gave property owners one year in which to comply with its provisions. Bloomington has not had an opportunity to use its zoning provisions for woodpile storage. One requirement of the ordinance specifies that wood must be stored six inches above the ground. Several agencies have commented that this height will invite habitation by rodents and vermin; the height specified should have been flush with the ground or at least 12 inches above it. Recommendation: Inasmuch as outside storage of firewood appears to present few prob e� ms in the City, there does not appear to be a clear-cut need to regulate woodpiles. Should the Council decide that establishing such regulations is desirable, it is recommended that woodpiles be regulated as matters of public nuisance, health and safety rather than a zoning issue. The Council may wish to refer this item to the Planning Commission and the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission to assess the need and appropriate regulation for outside storage of firewood. The Council should also conduct a public hearing prior to any final action on this matter. t For. more information contact: Janice Thompson Lliergy Uivi::.ion 980 American CeW Building 150 E. Kellogg 11: St. Paul, Pla 551 (612)296-8900 Firewood Storage avlel Ord.in:rc= 1) Statement of Folicy. The City Council finds that the use of renewable resources including :;cod is increasing. The Council recognizes that to protect public health cs:d safety, wood piles must be erected, located, and ]nvintained in a safe and ordorly f"shi.on. 2) Scope. This ordinance tmplics to th-_ storage of wood On residential prop;:rties within the City of (Fill in rars of ccImmun-Ity) except for the ex^::r:tiAns not_d below. Tkh=.ordinance shah- apply to any hood or wood nrcduct usually used or intended to be used as firewood in the I:P.S.iGeGCE] or ally ztcccsnory str.uCtI11:e. Note: Thhis section specifi_s fire:;ocd <aed :;oold not apply to lu:rber or of hmr wood cons^uct�on ;,ate_ials til It tray be stored on sesicie.:tia1 proaetty. TF^ lrngl:aga could be broac? -ned to incic:de th_sz: other wood K products if dosired, if. this -s done, thol.g':, a:l exs^ pt_:u:� nrovi ion concerniz:y tat:^or :y sto.*_zzg:- of ;,•ood cans`r.uction nateri:.'ls at eonstzz:ctio; could 1,: added. See note under suction y on exe-mptiors. 3) Conditions Of Storage. Firc•.;ocd `;hall b,a rtored it the following fashion: a) in neat and 0acuca :;tacks. b) the hoight• or- a woad pilo ojer three feet high :hall be no mare trice, its width. T::e me=:i<a a heigtli: a].11wrA is 6 feet. ej in a manner and location to i,ilni:si :l possible: problems of rat or other p-st liar i'a t1Q11. dj no wood r,h:kll bc! ._tol:ad w.:hiu tale rc'quizad minilrua area o€ cl:l;lcl; f•-n::] a ... _et. .i<il;t:-,lf.-aray 01: pracl,,:r.t.y line. r) 1„., wow ....:11. be :•to;.,d ilt o front: yard o/: yard that is ca„s;«n1y t ront.i��rr.i llur ;'.rant y:erd. fl! 'f r • 1rt ,toccd is cords. a-.ount of mood that may be ------ £) the r:eracre:a . (S"->e Hate bnlaa for guidance on how to deter:�!Ine a arir�ala sia^ it, if ally, Pproprizte in your eosT in p.�i.^.t b is into^dad to onsure Lhat. fire height o� Width- taller ,rand pile (ovs three fc_et birh) is consistent erth its width. A t�11, na _r r vood nil_ :;uuId be more likely to fall over- t1r�n a wood -t its height. A r a;cj.v a height li.xtit pilC t}r t 15 wido c:au-gh to u,7D3- be r ecessa_-y :ire_ n_ogle can only mach up so far to stack the n::y not h=..gift limit n-y be desired to ensur:� that s%ood piles ' is based on tha • c of 6ee rtt limit '• t do ?rav:? sa.-_ .Zinits. rf? ��,_,_ than f feet .,=am to be so hig:r thyt Segazd_T'ss re=:Ban 1t> :^at p He's said'_:, ti:_.c:�aaccs of t,wd falling off the pile s+cuZd be increased. i�taf:tar aptian s;orJd ba to se tFie Zirait at f3 fee.*., w}rieh F foot to p'r::a:r could�re:c:r, A:,other an as a r e:cod pi.Zes in your co--�;ri.'t3. to o s_-i. is th•e rv''_gcrt ctF ex g i cca c =• c _ad_•,a ,_,, t pass cb;rity t:1: t Broad p.tl s r• y �_ �� _:c- FSttScr.� �' more Zii:el.y to .z.J_ es A arood _vil. -. past . c i.s t :. wo_d ::ot ts::ed or u ed vnly inFrec.;�ntl?). XF an .. to pe,t:: ,:.an tk:e waoci in ,t oilc .�::ottld as r : usirt ::?a3 ia: ho:r.e h"ac.ir.3, •. �' :ersons ihar=fe'e pest lr oblc.;:s wU-7 p.�aa.:bly t._„ _.. •- �,. nr, .,apt 1n ^':�;?on�•d rrou� arm rorc Ii?tc-ty to pi.I:.'s o- if ,ta i,Q.tviat:::l. is :fly uc ;: fir�?tac� and to u;c: up n uv.ad ?ilc. i.hi:.' ft,_,_-> :.. v .,:_ •f of LO t_ ,z 1r;c:v :iorr c:o 1 rrvPr_atc. On_ pos ibilii:yreduirer.^._nt that wood language �zsy 1' zlP_ piles bo elevated ona foot off the yrociod on a platforn. This is consis- tent [r!t!r /;i>tnasotr tla-_ILh Dopy trsat licens::rry require:::nt for nobile that rys and recreat P ioa_1 ctPinr ereas th t stinulates = al-Crials be stored at least one foot above pipe, a::d otl:ar huildi::y n firs ground. Fizevvod [.mould b ircludcd ti _r t3:1t regu3ation. I.n in�oxt nt tt,� 1-hc c rnund requ.ircaent is t3rat: k Plztforn cant-i.on aboat a or- foot a v' would hava to he ;up tc stuzdily built to :;upon 4 •:oo' Pile. It seems at _.r[:iz,uy' Cc:r pilca be o7c:val.cd could ir:nrc:as_ azoblcsas very coscdbl.e tl: _ - with mood piles fading over or coll.tusing. This nea,ure only . t if tis .S_iaU:; pest roblom. ap _ ia c stirg s - Cot:' :.lion d ersu.ras that rsinina_j s^tbac% .-_..•_s are Kept. cLzr for firer ut.i.l i.t9, Pnd nairt...-an=_ access . - Condition e is included to adc3rass concerns about the aesthetics of [rood piles. If this i, not a concern in yocz case ity, tt: rr this condition can be re..-owed. T.r i3r re is ang con_::szon in youz- cc:: pity 'Fib gax:3 i:r the front yard j rC cx•:'?Pl_, the yazd; of Ia3:e-F ont ar river=font i on's, t1:an ii:is rt_ttc:•r stto::ld be accr•^-ss4d. Condit:.on f is an clsd_rl to a'.:z'-ss �;t--r%.s c:lx how large wood pile shoulc: b^ al-lowed on a lot. if this is rot cone ra in your co..::—ity, condi.tiv;: ca:: be r.ar.rove:d. if a lir it to tho s.i c of t:hfa wood i r Pile i:. c'c:;:.rcd in the ea��7-::ity: tt:ca one of the fallarir:a two anP_-o.�c':us ad. Vic first vi,l:i.aa is to link i:L a [o'rnt of frond that . ny i; its. .'hat is, t!:� I:raa co7or'd by tt:2 ' be stork.t wi.t:, lc,t coos:g" ram•.c __...,-.. toned :;co;; •:h 11 Le i,:clud::d in lo: r cu:re:::-'nts. X( t—? .aBdl-t.ioa in lot cov..r,:q^ c.acul t.:ic.,: r. - a via2r:;:ian [:cad th'it 'i ste ^d uo'.'a[ [ri.th thi_; siefh^: in that .ii:dividuc:l e:�'-crl.rtian:: t f + i:. 1: of tlu• �paro�riatc wood pile size on differcn lots would h_ necessazy 'to i at?on detcrr:irc wh=thar or not 1:a,re is a si: viol . _ I Tile seco::d option is to :,ct a !!;nit on 11:c nunber of cords of wood that my he _, _. ood is feel- wide, 4 feat high, and 8 feet lenq. The size limit r.:ust h camful.iy cietcr.�ired to Qr.. C! tY t tYe ability Of a hca_:wn r to .ectivaly ta= woad for ho:r.� ir11etirg isn't unreason.-f3.Zy i::a3ired. rio;,puca t>ond is used during t1:' wirrtc:: to haat an ave= g' Tns Y1i-:Lnesuta 1'=? =�-:r.t of Ylatural kesor_;rces e:'d a sucvay t l_ in rcatad tlrc ri! a✓era = bta Y:o.,� that uses wooc, for 50 pvrcen t or more of re of the13eatiag Ic 2d tsar• G.1 cords p'_• .tgu percent of [:or..= ?,(-_.ti_:g is Jlo: c;oo1 than,to zr.rl y 1eN� 50 54 c.=ds nc,_ J?ea:irg srason. ,ti-oa is to consi.d_r ho:, ;nuC t rr=rgTJ J+-3ot:^.=:r t;�y to .?.oa: at Ibis n.::'- is us_d in a typical ho.ae iJr ?: >_t_r and is rc omd to suprly that cr._ ;4• Snaco h•%t.in1 t.ypic;_.11t .:r7**fires 220 A .Loa .S ti;•il:�„'.C':. ,:Oul7 .�-:.,l i:�.!:c' ..JrJUt 10n r:i.lLLan bt.u:/y-:'r fnr- ::aac•_ J:e<.i:irg. t •s' ix�r l:n, hest?n;) Frti:_r_,. ^,1 o:3:ar 1.,:.c., c:o fcl 1.7 n:ftg and <._�tr.�rg a .:ocri ..road wuh 60 P rcon_ ef_.i.clv;• cy, Cher: 9.8 cores of to :u- n�R 100 ,.__?io<. B,'._S or 11.7 cords o w(ioc t: -- - a_=(' for an c C,. 1'.........__. wa„�1• 1.,u_, ,.aa..? 1"Wi.. t: 1„ ('�• '.t?7r it Q:a h:-n v�l l.a �• - ti h:otl.or f<�etox to consider is that wood should be dried for a year . or sore b,,fore being Lurred, so a wood pile may contrtin core than one heating season's worth of rood. ny size limit s With`:ould be evaluated wi local conditions in n?:3 ?. . . In nosthrrn l:ir_zesuta w ere rood zs nore readily available and wore peua.?e burn wood as f_r eir sole sov_ca of heat, the 1ir!u.t could be set higher.. In sou'?^era 7lin::esota w::erc wood burning is not as com.on, the limit could be s_t at a lo;,rar figure. For. c:aaplu, if your co,-�.ity includes i r�y individuals who o:Zy usa.wood for ho thez a limit of 20 cords nay be appropriate_ This :.•veld allow for 10 cards of r:'ood for each of tv:o heating Seasons. If most wood users in ;our conmmity use wood only as fuel then 12 cords my b0 ?.n aga_opriate Iirrit. This r"ould allot for 2 ue s supply <. su,^_ng t1:at a' cords ar o burned Celch haatin, season. 6) Flood _toga;e unc??r the following circu-mstances shall be exer.fit. front the conditions outlined a'suve: a) Wood stored oc 1:ept in a covered e;tructure i,anervious to U) is^porary stora,a of lciy^s for up to thirty (30) dayn outside of the rocu:.red area; of sE bac}; rrn;;r .liner, and r.trept. is nllo::ed for th:� purpose of cutting .und Cal.i.Yting logs to .r size. nF�eable in tnu r(.�s,.U!ence's wcod burning davi.cc. • ti0i.r.. .,� i.i r('::;K) f;, ...�.. :�:.__�__� �a ti._ 2:cop:' of Me to avoid cc;:fur:i.cn ca:ce_sf.�; c:) 9' :r c,..ci; ., o^,: for rip to of ,'l.r::al�r ^.c) .t.__ t:zcn �T. t 5) Existing Wood piles. l.ny weod pile i.n e:ci::t^_nce as of c•_ of the ordi^a^ce) �!iiich c:oa rot co--'Ply with (Fill in d::te of passa,' try provisions o2 this o-dinancc squat ba zer;,ovrd or plzs::eu in cc plies^.a= ozdin rice's Provisions witnin one yeaz [-ter wzitton notice to with this Provisio Lhe 'Coning Afl:,in?.stzatoz. Such notice shall be in writing and co-.?ly by sha31 be sezved s:ron the p.ropaztY os.raer either in pzmon or. b1 tJ should e rotificat_o.^. prccedure typically used in your C i Note, bn used :In this mett_.r as wz2l. Every n convicted o` a V'Ql-a"On of g) Pen _ty. y any r cv!._;ion at -a p==sc i ty of a sai d�!ame.�aor. this orclincr-ce si:atl b' 9u 1 Vote: 'his is o:19 Ar!nta_r a of nz,_y options cv:c_n=ry P >naltzes. ' prcvisicns•; y , cy LO t!sy ordi.n.,r• option b-" toref_f yc:r co..fez= au,?ic nL?s_:zc_ leca pa^alt_es o< b o�.ef reve on Pin ^c_ of sola,`.ic^s it yo:r a;�pfap_ e Pe:szl_tg co.,:ce_^ia3 vi.o?c t.tn of the snood i r j I ' I i r City Council Agenda - 3 - Tuesday, July 17, 1984 VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS. BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members B. Report of City Manager 1. Recommendation of Architect for new City Hall Page 1598 C. Report of City Attorney D. Re ort of Director of Public Works 1. wort on Anderson Lakes Parkway right-of-way acquisition Page 1600 VIII. NEW BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT. 3 TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager / FROM: Eugene A. Oietz, Oirector of Public Works G� K DATE: July 13, 1984 SUBJECT: Valley View Road Right-of-Way Exchange Attached for your review and consideration is a tentative agreement (right- of-entry) which provides for an exchange of right-of-way between owners of various Edenvale property and the City of Eden Prairie. The parcels are located along Edenvale Boulevard will be utilized for the bike trail that is currently under construction. There is approximately 2.62 acres contained in these.parcels. The primary exchange however is the land to be exchanged as shown in Exhibit "C" for that shown in Exhibit "0". As was our policy with the MCA roadway project, we acquired any remnant parcels that were created. Exhibit "0" shows the remnant that we purchased from the First National Bank of St. Paul which contains approximately 2.30 acres. This property is located immediately adjacent to the Edenvale 9th Addition and is a logical addition to that subdivision. By itself,.:the parcel is not large enough to sustain any building construction. The primary parcel that we would receive from Equitable is shown on Exhibit "C". This parcel contains approximately 1.61 acres and will provide the flexibility necessary to construct Valley View Road in the vicinity of the railroad overpass for whichever alternate is selected (at grade or grade separated). A vacation of approximately 0.49 acres will be possible at a future date. The sequence of events that led to this proposed right-of-way exchange was purely coincidental but appears to adequately meet our needs as well as the Edenvale property owners. In total, we are going to receive 4.23 acres in exchange for 2.79 acres. We believe that this is a good exchange and Staff recommends that the concept be approved. Unless otherwise directed by City Council, we will proceed with the concept as presented and will prepare the necessary deeds and documents for execution at a later date. EAO:sg S ly�u CITY OFFICES/8950 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD/EDEN PRAIRIE.MN 55344.2499/TELEPHONE 16121937.2262 _ � 4 June 20, 1984 j 'John Lassen Edenvale, Inc. 14500 Valley View Road Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344 Subject: I.C. 51-356A Edenvale Boulevard - Bike Path Dear John: This letter constitutes a right-of-entry to construct a bike path along Edenvale Boulevard. The terms of the right-of-entry are as follows: limitedZ/n 1. The respective property owners will execute al warranty deed for 0utlots B and C, Edenvale 5th Addition, outlots A and B. Tamarac Woods and Lot 1, Block 1 Edenvale 14th Addition (shown on Exhibit "A" and "B") upon preparation and presentation byRfor City at no cost to the City. limited 2. The property owners will execute aAwarranty deehe property.' as generally shown on Exhibit C 'for the realignment of Valley t View Road at no cost to the City. 3. The City will vacate that section of Valley View Road shown on 1 Exhibit "C" to the adjacent property owner subject to easements at no cost (timing will be after new roadway is constructed). 4. The City will provide a warranty deed for the property shown on Exhibit "D" to the adjacent owner subject to easements at no cost. 5. The property owners will execute the right-of-entries for Lots 13, 12 & 11, Block 1, Tamarac Woods at no cost to the City. ryes t Lassen -2- 020/84 The approval of this letter will allow the City to begin constructing the bike path along Edenvale Boulevard. The City staff is in accord with this arrangement and will recommend this proposal to the City Council at a future meeting for formal action. Since ' Eugene A. Dietz Approved: Director of Public Works Equitab e Lifrance Society EAD:sg by Enclosures Edt ration • t �.:buti d��r niver alai L�orporation E rl i 1 SEC 4-•T ib.R.:"2.. tom I�qC 4'pj O•+ CH IS t .•10 fl.7r cu o.ao-s .(41tteil OQ IQ .OrS y4 D '$ yp 1f �S = F l qjb a +' .•w+� .� . pb1 e 7—,1 s4 t- A I N •'''•as. z0,al U �_(T •^.4 71201 a`. �� \9ti6 �p ��L''0 T."Vt CIR .•.. (4!)• '..�frf•B� ^1t aye . � ��w `e jt �s�JJe,JI � , •V� �5� lT7� IM•N_��e:t o:e na.,6':f t5t-'4 f \3139 10 i2w-OUTLOT R,n s", tM1 . !a 4y, a• >.w n.. 9 OL E�_ '1• ,, a f y0^�. fJ J- pp •.r.r 9°I t. '•- i i ✓ .�4�... `T l�le•`,�a�a re a syq v°� °,vV r OUTLOT B 4 ' ! r0•!',yd�.' ,.10 7t �a eJ, e;`�,�SJ "` 7f � �of ^ p9 (�} • ' Ti. s'a��Ge ( „V')9y. ••,•ia y>.+`F e (Ib) e`' �a'� 6,,^ er'�. ° 3�•w •< 1u44e o r o a ,• p : ?.° 3., .. `- r•9sa °•F 4 t.t 4C0 "< lcae�� •y 4�9*< 3 •sy-?;T:.• 'tn'",J'° . � a1' +,t a 4) s5 ..es �f ( , •''r, ITIr e ,� ;' .r (.T1 y _(TrZ, ?b '.1N13. '_ far a Sit , Y .. ✓ <, a.+ 9 3 ,r 4 O. •F .r 10 _� t.t o " � � tat) :u b:>) u ;l)y 6 • ^(7b) ��, �� `re.. •�0 ♦�Tco \e�ry1�iE�9S •'95 C4' .may, �` �N Tt`S a- ', !S i �i o :yv U°Nd t`Ca^°GrL° �bRE5K518E-Y �o `,,,4y 1 �z.�}.a, ' W OQ� Ij i6 r;OL{S J__zss,s -b=S7. 1 1 o as1 :\ yvayr '�+i:AD�Tr0 9ooT`•"!T 55, 6 ` c'�',7s012• _ t�tt. 5cob 1 �. +1 � •.S 4 .. .. i `141 )11 Na°G, 1110, r10 6.9:5 Nb:111!C •1�0'�a 'efu q ,.y J1' N.1.10 W--� <i r v �- 01• AZ S s•w s � � b �V�� •• � N[S7_ .. OUTLOT J 1 •94 of \' JJ J E>kk� "A" ou,. � 2 4 .•a• / `�•r�.� h ttt P.••,A�Br�a��i. l7 f� A is :141) /�l,'ti�s•) °� tVXX ++1y`� G 1�Y� fz` •i,tb( :► `\ 11 l�tr �F�'•gt)�g2s (6+1 x 1• . ,'e• � ..��t` q ': � ;r� ts)` z 1 ( set•oss�' So: . • i r Q '�B �� ay•Sy•� f\ 2�L 22\ ,zu A roa»u• 1 ti Ou T'..,)T • ./`. iOc�)v� ✓�� .,o}�� (n)�(('lA`� � ,�• ��w41sQ \/ ,.rt` 'ao° rtC^N,v e o ��I ti� y •.`4 � 7 4p y2�y, \�\` a, �)� a2y o�4 -J •.b °bra t�.•, N _ '(AI) ltd r•o•k••• 19 /� tr_'� `�. 111 n•'•O••_"�.w ^i ,`t •�'"� 1D�rs „^��^Zyb �e>S-T .472� la�, �,°.i•a �. 5 .tee Z°'a((.1•)t`:t S(it) w ae -,r e /v.0 (34 a(!°! >�o t�14 1- • `I IS o l4 y9 13 �D'.j1- rd •i7,t 6 i-' J . 4 0 'itsl lcr`�1) ,toP,F.1? .✓(al13 - (�y�`�( •t vs .,,V'';ii, rG. ( z,., A 7) U�•e •^•v �vi �"• `'.S'° �I tit b��{7_so;�G1Y S N Jyr� ` •.2,d, F`7 12 tv p Po ' s ' M� _. ,gyp- ,• � _� ��.. ---1 i.:�HfL•E°u�l � .J,�,f _.�...� ��.a I'��;y�--'. ��iw55 4' �' ».,,.i +•.e . 9 :v•10 .11 } z'"Tc D01fiC1",• , p BY,7`r o�'(i5)•e '/td S l 'jea�91)J �. 9.•YN�C^ti•' •w u�N/.ut•. �i�•` _ ' - ; (tt)^ti�ti1��• t3.��'Q� .'•-., b,1�!)".: - ..+ 'e,.,�r4's'Cd n..L ��:':'�a.J\r 1 cl `:,- 4 :f: .ie rJ! -.,v•r.6" 4J� v..`4' 1� • p i)t}¢S(14)``.,,•*`L ;y r.,an'I�'•` 'rG 'tr.ti S: !,•." `Q°' (y\l'�{ } t ° _ \ yOisi(7) •� 2(t+�a ? , ,yt r 3 3 z/\ `� 3 5 ti5+�(71) /+v> N1 4,7 ,.,. � ti.''' ':•°'/// � 4�1' 4�. • o - - a' ^fit- a ' • y� 10 V, ;<.• Wv `: OUTIOT 0 •��I }44 ° LP,,p,• g \8' 6-{�,r*�"� C 44 is- ' \ '• ti/d,y)a, ar3-• r y�oGA a ,0 (•+):• t `r:,I�. �40, 2r43s v i Ou " t�Y 0u OT 0 I (•9 0 i _ ` .r . ,SAD q9j� s !8�1-,1� C 1 � a � -fl(�� lis) /(`�E 6641.• � isy 8 =d. Le, o^(a9J 1�u ^`'j° s\ l6� Z t5 CQl� c - 2 titi ,l c s r 1 _^i_`C••�ate; ' y�e N�}13 :i•,�,'. i�J ') 3`tlbt- , r 4 • 1 �636.41 Rea/.�s •1 �•'� .5 9 \�._Q�'..- — _ _. -'• 34 �1 •tNESCt -- .)4-V •-rs 7 1/4 — _ SE 1.4 • NW _9_M' NE •✓ •��• �• nonol9G0�JO.Ji 39.•t01)�1090�<:'JIJ^TO .....cus..- _ �J ' ;�•'r .•; aR; ,r : �, ._ -ooff" �: >m • a u R In fir•:>'�1 N Q - ..� Y t _`.a° 1 N� i ? ,yam• ~ 'w�? � ' � _ } .* � •.i f. v, W $Yin Q t oo� 1-- > ACI, t wJ 1 \ ? NU' I ' pQ ,..> y) No 3� '~► ¢LL - U> Qt id /rr D •o� /�a m m Nm W �I p rl • a ?- N N m W} La W p 1 W m�- Q U U �cr c , w D U a Q 3 1r 3 m Co a Sw Ru rr ¢a rci Q> uw a� w> co f N j O1 N In Oj m0 !� N V �; to wm o Wo °p1,, n in 0 ^ U r133UiS 3"109b 1996IS ) o - - \ S - 00 - 9) dJ O N - �) )bJ \ m I?Z O u N byp 20,gyp. I - N m N cr = J6 ss 2 i w w w bo•, 6�1 � '¢o gyp. _.^+`Pcmi s- _ .. . )b `9 w a a w w a o g dJ`y Sb / / / 4 t• �- m N b { a• = on to CO0 ,�,e, � Ww rm / J En � 0 4 y o F � / W U) / Cr W w ' U¢ (w y7 i LL p Q U. _ 3 in cr 0 En - = v O O I / W Q Nam—C,Ent • •• • •• 410 ••• •fO Sf 21. - \ V Ilug ,.• ,� W July 17, 1984 y: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 84-I83 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the City Engineer, through RCM, Inc. has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements. to wit: I.C. 52-062, Lift Station and force main at CSAH 1/18 and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in the City Engineer's office. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The adver- tisement shall be published for 2 week(s); shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be opened �. C August 16, 1984, at 10:30 A.M., Fire Station, 7801 Mitchell Ave., and considered by the Council at 7:30 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, August 21„1984, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed ? ° with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for f 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 17, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor John D. Frane, Clerk /49' July 17, 1984 t CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 84-170 RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A HEARING WHEREAS, .a report has been given.by the City Engineer to the City Council on July 17, 19B4, recommending the following improvements to wit: I.C. 52-065, Valley View Realignment, Golden Triangle Drive and W. 74th Street adjacent to Norseman's 6th Addition and utilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: i 1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of property abutting or within said boundaries for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to M.S.A. Section 429.011 to 429.111, at an estimated total cost of the improvements as shown. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 7 day of August, 1984 at 7:30 P.M. at the Eden Prairie School Board Meeting Room, 8100 School Road. The City Clerk shall give published and mailed notice of such hearing on the improvements as required by law. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 17, 1984. I Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor i ATTEST: SEAL }I ohn D. Frane, ity:C erk i i a CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-180 RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING 5 PREPARATION OF 1984 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLS AND SETTING HEARING DATE WHEREAS, contracts have been let for the following listed improvements and the total project cost, including expenses incurred, or to be incurred and the City's share, exclusive of that assignable to City property, are established as shown on the attached Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE. IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: i 1. The cost of such improvements to be specially assessed are hereby declared to be those as set forth in Exhibit A. 2. The City Clerk with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be assessed for each improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the office of the Deputy City Clerk for public inspection. 3. A hearing shall be held on the 21st day of August, 1984, in the School Boardroom, 8100 School Road, South Entrance, at 7:30 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessments and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessments. 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessments to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of record of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 17, 1984. i Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST SEAL John 0. Frane, Clerk rug� Lion's Tap/Lynn Charlson CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 19-83 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Commercial Highway District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Commercial Highway District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph 8, shall be, and are amended accordingly. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, . entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. y Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 17th day of May, 1983, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 17th day of July, 1984. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Pentel, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of 149q CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-179 A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LION'S TAP AND LYNN CHARLSON FOR CONTINUATION OF EXISTING COMMERCIAL USE AND TWO SINGLE FAMILY RURAL DISTRICT LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 24.2 ACRES BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal for Lion's Tap and Lynn Charlson for the continuation of a 1.6 acre commercial site for the Lion's Tap and two Rural residential lots on approximately 24.2 acres, located in the northwest quadrant of Highway #169 and County Road #4, is herein approved subject to the following specific conditions: 1. The site improvement plan, dated April 22, 1983, preliminary plat, dated June 7, 1984, grading plan, dated March 14, 1983, building plans dated February 10, 1984, and landscape plan, dated June 10, 1982, all attached hereto shall apply. 2. Prior to submission to the City Council of the final plat, developer shall revise the final plat to indicate the following: A. Along Lot 3, show a 66 ft. wide right-of-way for County Road #4 and 53 ft. wide right-of-way for Eden Prairie Road. B. Along Lot 1, show a 33 ft. wide right-of-way along the western half of the right-of-way for County Road #4. 3. Concurrent with the submission of the final plat to the City Council, developer shall provide the City with.a document of Restrictive Covenants to ► be place on Lot 2 for protection and retention of the Indian Burial Mound located thereon. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, developer shall: . A. Submit proper documentation to the Building Department including, but not limited to: a lot survey, legal description, topography of the site both existing and proposed, location of driveway(s) and sight lines, method(s) of restoring disturbed areas, proposed structure locations and setbacks from property lines, preliminary structure designs, proposed locations of well and septic systems and setbacks from systems on adjacent lots, suitability of soils for well and septic systems, and location of fences and structures on the lot and lots adjacent to the site. B. Receive approval from Hennepin County for access to County Road #4. The final plat shall reflect any revisions as required by the County. C. Receive a permit from Hennepin County for work within the right-of- way. 1495 t D. Receive Watershed District approval and follow the recommendations of the Watershed District. E. Pay the required Cash Park Fee. 5. Use of the 1.6-acre site shall be limited to the continued use known as the Lion's Tap, as approved by the plans listed above. No other use, expansion of the current use, nor other user shall be allowed for the 1.6-acre parcel, except as approved by said plans. ADOPTED by the City Council on , 1984. 1 Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor 3 ATTEST: John D. rane, ity C er I f y i j d 'j. Ridgewood West 4th CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 42-84-PUD-7-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 7-84- R1-9.5 District (hereinafter "POD 7-8441-9.5"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of July 10, 1984, entered into between Centex Homes of the Midwest, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement") The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of POD 7-84- R1-9.5, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. POD 7-84-R1-9.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide Plan of the City. B. POD 7-84-R1-9.5 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code, which are contained in POD 7-84-R1-9.5, are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. POD 7-84-R1-9.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is, removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 7-84-R1-9.5 District, and the leqal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their ntirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its f a d passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 5th day of June, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 10th day of July, 1984. ATTEST: ' John D. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of i 1 iyyy r i i 1 i A Exhibit A i Legal Description Blocks 1, Lots 28-44 and Block 3, Lots 1-5, Ridgewood West, Hennepin County, Minnesota. I 3 i t 1 j I 4n� � Ridgewood West 4th PUD-7-84-DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of 1984, by and between Centex Homes Midwest, Inc., a Nevada corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY Of EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied for Zoning District Change from R1-13.5 to R1-9.5-PUD-7-84, with variances, Planned Unit Development District Review, and preliminary platting of 8.85 acres, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof and hereinafter referred to as "the property;" and, WHEREAS, the property is part of a tract encompassing 64 acres all of which as received Planned Unit Development Concept review and approval; and, WHEREAS, Developer desires to develop the property as 30 single family cluster lots, based on plans dated April 6, 1984; NDW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #42-84-PUD- 7-84 and Resolution #84-133, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: 1. Developer shall plat and develop the property in conformance with the materials dated April 6, 1984, as revised, reviewed and approved by the City Council on June 5, 1984, and attached hereto as Exhibit 8, and made a part hereof, subject to such•changes and modifications as are provided herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein. 2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by :;J U Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in lip Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. IL 3. Prior to submission of the final plat, Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of a revised plat which adjusts the lot sizes in order that the homes shall be proportioned appropriately to the lot size to meet the floor area ratio requirements of 15% for single story units and 25% for two story units. 4. Prior to final plat, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's approval of: A. Grading, drainage and erosion control, sewer, water, and street plans. B. Plans for extension of a six-inch water line in Shiloh Court between Lots 16 and 17, to the end of the property to eventually loop with a water line planned for Saratoga Lane. C. A utility easement between Lots 16 and 17 for utility purposes. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements shown in the above listed plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 5. Concurrent with the final plat, Developer shall request vacation of 4,000 sq. ft. of excess right-of-way at the north edge of Shiloh Court. 6. Prior to final plat, Developer shall receive approval . of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans from the Purgatory Creek Watershed District. 7. Prior to final plat, Developer shall submit to the Director of Community Services, and receive the Director's approval of plans for a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk on private property along one side of Wellington Drive to be maintained by the Homeowners' Association. Upon approval by the Director of Community Services of said plans, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed on said plan, as approved by the Director of Community Services. 8. Prior to building permit issuance, developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Dfrector's approval of: A. An overall street lighting, mailbox, .and signage plans. B. An overall development plan keying specific unit types and facades to individual lots. In addition, Developer shall j 150� also provide an overall site development plan which indicates proposed decking, landscaping, and fencing. A three-foot high privacy fence shall be located parallel to driveway entrances to screen parking areas from Wellington Drive and Shiloh Court. Upon approval by the Director of Planning of said plans, Developer j ose imrovemts shall construct, or cause to be constrrovedted�bththe Directorenof shown in the above listed plans, as approved, pp Y Planning. 9. Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall complete development of the mini-park according to the specifications set forth in Exhibit D of the September 21, 1982, Developer's Agreement. 10. Developer shall develop the property in accordance with that certain developer's agreement dated September 21, 1982, entered into by and between Developer and City, for the Planned Unit Development, except to the extent that said agreement is inconsistent with this Agreement. e Ridgewood West 4th 'j CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-161 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF.ORDINANCE 42-84-PUD-7-84 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SULIARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 42-84-PUD-7-84 was adopted and ordered published at a y regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , 1984; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 42-84-PUD-7-84, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at ' the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance i shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 42-84-PUD-7-84 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on 1984. k;olfgang H. Fenzel, Playor + { ATTEST: d . i John D. frane, City Clerk i i Ridgewood West 4th The following is the full text of the City of Eden Prairie Ordinance No. 42-84-PUD- 7-84, which was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on July 10, 1984. Following the text of the • Ordinance, the Developer's Agreement, which is incorporated therein by Section 5 of the Ordinance, is summarized. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN CDUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE N0. 42-84-PUD-7-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PRDVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 7-84- R1-9.5 District (hereinafter "PUD 7-84-R1-9.511). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of July 10, 1984, entered into between Centex Homes of the Midwest, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement") The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD 7-84- R1-9.5, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD 7-84-R1-9.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD 7-84-R1-9.5 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and 3 unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters it and 12 of 9 the City Code, which are contained in PUD 7-84-R1-9.5, are justified f by the design of the development described therein. f D. PUD 7-84-R1-9.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement t that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is, removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 7-84-R1-9.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in i each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter I entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and 1 Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their • entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 5th day of June, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 10th day of July, 1984. ATTEST: o n D. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel., Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of F S�j Summary of Developer's Agreement: Ridgewood West 4th Addition Developer will develop the land as described in Exhibit A which is attached to and incorporated in the Developer's Agreement. In addition, the Developer's Agreement provides for: 1. Submission of plans regarding sewer, water, and drainage to Engineering Department. 2. Submission to the City Engineer of a development Plan for the land. 3. Submission to Watershed District of storm sewer construction plans. Developer to follow the rules and regulations of said Watershed District. 4. Developer's warranty of title to the land. 5. Construction and maintenance of public improvements which are to be conveyed to the City as well as preservation and restoration of areas surrounding said improvements. Submission of a bond or letter of credit to ensure the quality of said construction, maintenance, preservation, and restoration. 6. Rough grading to be performed by the Developer for improvements which the City will construct pursuant to 100% petition of all owners of the land. Submission of a bond or letter of credit for the rough grading. 7. Payment of first three (3) years' street lighting, engineering review, and street signs costs. B. Developer's commitment not to oppose rezoning if Developer fails to proceed in accordance with,the Developer's Agreement within 24 months. 9. Application of the Developer's Agreement to transferees of the land. 10. City's remedies in the event that Developer violates the provisions of the Developer's Agreement. 11. Notice to the City's cable franchise. 12. Revise plat to adjust lot sizes in order that homes are proportioned appropriately to meet the floor area ratio requirements of 15% for single story units and 25% for two story units. 13. Provide grading, drainage and erosion control, sewer, water, and street plans to City Engineer and receive City Engineer's approval thereof. 14. Provide plans for extension of a six-inch water line in Shiloh Court between Lots 16 and 17 to the end of the property to eventually loop with a water line planned for Saratoga Lane. Provide utility easement between Lots 16 and 17. Above plans and easement to be submitted to the City Engineer and Developer to receive City Engineer's approval thereof. 15. Concurrent with final plat, Developer to vacate 4,000 sq. ft. of excess right-of-way at the north edge of Shiloh Court. 16. Developer shall receive approval of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans from the Purgatory Creek Watershed District prior to final plat. 17. Submit to Director of Community Services plans for a five-foot wide concrete 1 sidewalk on private property along one side of Wellington Drive to be maintained by homeowners' association, and receive Director's approval thereof. 18. Prior to building permit issuance, provide to the Director of Planning an j overall street lighting, mail box, signage plans, and development plan keying unit types to individual lots which includes proposed decking, 1 landscaping, and fencing three-feet in height located parallel to driveway entrances to screen parking areas from Wellington Drive and Shiloh Court. Developer to receive Director's approval of above plans. 19. Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall complete development of mini-park. 20. Developer to comply with terms of September 21, 1982, agreement for said j property, except as inconsistent with this agreement. f I. 1 NOTICE: A printed copy of this ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 10, 1984. John 0. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang N. Fenzel, Mayor S i 7 i I I� t E M E M O R A N D U M TO: Eden Prairie City Council FROM: Roger Pauly DATE: June 26, 1984 RE: Joint Purchasing of Fire Department Equipment Director of Public Safety Jack. Hacking has brought to our attention that significant cost savings may be achieved by parti- cipation in a joint purchasing program which involves approximately 54 local governmental units in this region of the State. This group is organized as the Seven County Fire Department Joint Powers Pur- chasing Consortium. The City of St. Paul Purchasing Department acts as the Consortium's agent in the solicitation and award of bids. North St. Paul Chief Howard Anderson, who organizes and directs a great deal of the Consortium's work, indicates that the typical i process involves each individual department sending a list of its needs to the City of St. Paul Purchasing Department. This Purchasing Department then solicits and awards bids based on the approximate needs of the various communities. When bids are awarded, each individual governmental unit enters into its own purchase agreement with the vendor. Bill Peter, the purchasing agent for the City of St. Paul indicates that the bidding instructions are such that no individual governmental unit is legally bound to purchase any particular item until after the bid has been accepted, the purchase authorized by the City Council, and a purchase agreement with the vendor finalized. Minnesota Statutes §471.59 authorizes joint action of this type by governmental units in Minnesota. The attached form of resolutions and agreement are based upon forms supplied by the City of St. Paul purchasing Department and the Seven County Fire Department Joint Powers i ��b Y, Purchasing Consortium. These resolutions and agreement authorize participation in the Consortium and appoint the City of St. Paul Purchasing Department as the bidding agent for this process. i i I i !!4 I 'E 1 1 . 1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 847 181 3 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION BY THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE IN JOINT AND COOPERATIVE PURCHASING OF FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT BY THE ; SEVEN COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT JOINT POWERS j PURCHASING CONSORTIUM c WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie maintains and operates a fire department, and; WHEREAS, the Seven County Fire Department Joint Powers Pur- chasing Consortium achieves economies of scale for its members through cooperative and joint purchasing of fire department supplies and equipment, and; WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie considers it to be in the best interests of the City to participate with other fire departments i in the seven county metro area in cooperative and joint purchase of fire department supplies and equipment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Eden Prairie does hereby authorize the participation of its fire department, through its fire chief, in cooperative and joint purchase of fire 1 department equipment and supplies, through or with other member departments of the Seven County Fire Department Joint Powers Pur- chasing Consortium. Adopted by the City Council of Eden Prairie this day of 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: _____ — John D. Frane 15t� CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84- 182 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING JOINT PURCHASING OF FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT BY THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AND THE CITY OF ST. PAUL I WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie maintains and operates a fire department, and; WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie considers it to be in the best interests of the City to participate with the City of St. Paul in joint purchasing of fire department supplies and equipment in order to achieve economies of scale. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Eden Prairie does hereby authorize the participation of its fire department, through its fire chief, in the joint purchase of fire department g equipment and supplies in accordance with the attached Joint Pur- chasing Agreement. Adopted by the City Council of Eden Prairie this day of 1984. r Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor � ATTEST: John D. Frane P t_ JOINT PURCHASING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of 1984, by and between the City of Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and the City of St. Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota; WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie and the City of St. Paul, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 471.59, are authorized to enter into agreements to exercise jointly the governmental powers and functions each has individually; and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie and the City of St. Paul desire to combine their purchasing functions for the purchase of fire equipment, materials and supplies in order to secure more favorable prices. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the parties r f hereto as follows, to-wit: 1. That the City of St. Paul shall in accordance with the procedures set forth in the St. Paul City Charter and applicable 3 State Statutes, including but not limited to Minn. Stat. §471.345 as amended, make joint purchases for both the City of Eden Prairie f. and the City of St. Paul of whatever same or similar .fire equipment, materials and supplies are authorized and requested by both the City of Eden Prairie and the City of St. Paul . f 2. Each party shall make payment directly to the vendor ac- cording to established procedures. 3. Neither party shall assume any responsibility for the ztccountability of funds expended by the other or the .issuance of s a purchase order by the other party. t i 151� 4. Each party shall be separately accountable for its own expenditures of public funds made hereunder. 5. After bids have been received by the purchasing department of the City of St. Paul and awarded, each party shall enter into its own contract or agreement with the vendor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Eden Prairie and the City of St. Paul have executed this agreement the day and year first above written. j City of Eden Prairie City of St. Paul tj Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor Mayor C Carl J. Jullie Department of Financing City Administrator Management Services 1 s '1 1 i i 1 j -2- 1513 ' 4 _ 1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #84-176 RESOLUTION APPRDVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SCENIC HEIGHTS FOR NORMAN KERR BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Scenic Heights Residential Subdivision, for Norman Kerr, dated July 2, 1984, consisting of 9.54 acres into 20 single family lots and one out Tot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to' be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. s ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of 1984. J tp4 Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor a ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk i i a July 8, 1984 City Councilt We object to the Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 and the future development of 20 single family homes by the Kerr Companies. That is the most scenic .,art of the bike path, and should be preserved if we are f 1 to retain the wilderness feeling of Eden Prairie. We have watched Mitchell Road develop into an industrial area and the farmland to the south of us develop into a residential area. The new freeway will damage the western end of Scenic Heights. Soon there will be no "scenic" left. 1 i { We realize development is necessary, however, and offer I some possible solutionst It Create a buffer zone between the path and the lots, with a 100' greenway, paid for by the developer . 2t Allow only one road to cross the bike path. 3s Decrease the density of the lots from 20 to 10 or preferably 5. 41 Allow no bulldozing of the area that would destroy - trees and change the watershed. Please realize also that the few deer and grey herons left in this area live on that land, and croca the road between .the two ponds. Thank you for listening. Please notify us ofsany dev_ell- opmento. 'L✓✓ Sandra and Misr Stephens, 8360 Heather Avenuo ,c..�, STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner tR OUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: June 22, 1984 PROJECT: Scenic Heights Residential Subdivision APPLICANT & FEE OWNER: Norman Kerr LOCATION: South of Scenic Heights Road, West of Red Rock Road REQUEST: Preliminary Plat of 9.54 acres into 20 single family lots and one outlot, and Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 Background — The Comprehensive Guide Plan identi- PUB 16-9,16.10 fies a Low Density Residential land 1 B use for this site for up to 2.5 units per acre. The Guide Plan — depicts surrrounding land uses as -F Low Density Residential and open space. The site is characterized by a natural ridge running through the ' center of the site. From this high �� ` k point, the land gradually slopes towards Scenic Heights Road on the �J �t44 SITE north and to the pond on the south. PROPOSED SITE The majority of the site vegetation �' consists of low land types including 1 ash, poplar, and box elder. One 17-3 eight-inch oak tree in the center of �. r 1 the site will be lost due to roadway f- construction. ` The site abuts a ponding area, which is not classified as a protected `� - 21-4 water. Therefore, provisions of the shoreland management ordinance will not apply in this situation. The preliminary plat shows an outlot over th i s pond i ng area to be CQ. �� •s' dedicated for public purposes. _ A R Z A L TI M A, L"� l*enic Heights 2 June 22, 1984 Site Plan Twenty 111-9.5 lots are proposed at a net density of 2.5 units per acre based on 7.92 acres of developable land. The average lot size is 14,900 square feet. Twelve of the twenty lots within this subdivision are 13,500 square feet or greater in size. All of the lots exceed the minimum 9,500 square -.foot requirement. Lots 6, 7, 16, 17, and 18, do not meet the minimum 55-foot street frontage requirement for R1-9.5 zoning. Tire preliminary plat should be revised to reflect this minimum street frontage. This site is adjacent to R1-13.5 lots in the Red Rock Hills 2nd Addition. Lot widths and street frontages within this subdivision average approximately 100 feet. Comparitively speaking, lot frontages and widths on the south side of Street A average about 75 feet. To provide a better transition between these residential areas, and to provide more buildable area between the setbacks, Staff would recomnend that the minimum street frontage and lot width be 85 feet for lots not on a cul-de-sac on the south side of Street A. Attachment A indicates land area to the west of the site which can be served by sewer and water. Staff has prepared a conceptual layout. of how this land might be developed and connected with existing road systems in the area. Staff feels that a connection should be made between this site and adjacent property for emergency -chicle access, and to connect neighborhoods. Staff expects that extension of 1 .reet A to the western property line will not result in the loss of lots from this subdivision. Attachment 8 shows what this subdivision might look like with this street connection, 55-foot minimum frontages on cul-de-sac lots, and 85-foot frontages for lots on the south side of the street. Architecture At this time, four basic unit types are envisioned for this subdivision, ranging in size between 1,200 and 2,000 square feet, with tv.,o-car attached garages. We understand that additional elevations will be presented for each unit. The proponent has submitted an overall development plan depicting unit types on specific lots. In conjunction with City policy for this zoning district, proponent will be required to provide an overall development plan, keyed with the elevations of each of the unit types, showing that no two similar unit types shall be located side by side, directly across, or diagonally across from each other. Grading and Drainage A minimal amount of site grading work is proposed. Storm water run-off will .sheet drain overland towards the ponding area and towards Scenic Heights Road. Storm water run-off from Street A will sheet drain across Scenic Heights Road into the ponding area to the north. This can present traffic problems due to wet and icy onditions. Staff would recnrMend that catch basins be located near the intersection of Street A and Scenic Heights Road, with a storm sewer pipe under Scenic Heights Road connected to the ponding area on the north. The amount and location of catch basins and size and location of storm sewer pipe should be determined by the City Engineer. Scenic Heights 3 June 22, 1984 Utilities Sewer and water service are available to this site by connection to a 16-inch water line in Scenic Heights Road and to an eight-inch sewer line in the Red Rock Road cul-de-sac to the east of this site. The existing ten-foot drainage and utility easement between these lots is not of sufficient width to accommodate proposed construction. It will be necessary for the proponent to obtain grading easements from adjacent property owners to allow construction to occur. Attachment C indicates three alternative ways of providing sewer service to this site. Alternative A is the option proposed by the proponent. It is Staff's understanding that the adjacent property owners have expressed concern about the sewer line extension between their properties. Alternative B represents a direct connection to the eight-inch sewer line in Red Rock Road extending along the northern boundary line of the Red Rock Hills 2nd Addition. The extension of a sewer line in this location would allow for future subdivsion of larger parcels to the north represented by RLS 1#136. Alternative C represents a connection to an existing sewer line in Village Woods Road which could be completed, if the property immediately to the west were to develop at this time. Lighting The proponent should provide an overall street lighting plan and lighting details for review. RECOMMENDATION. .Staff would recommend approval of the request for Preliminary Plat to subdivide 9.58 acres into 20 single family lots and one.outlot and Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-9.5 subject to the following: 1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: A. Revise the preliminary plat to extend Street A to the western boundary limits. B. Revise lot sizes to reflect a minimum frontage of 85 feet for all lots south of Street A, except that lots on the cul-de-sac may have a minimum frontage of 55 feet. C. Revise the grading and drainage plan to reflect catch basins near the intersection of Street A and Scenic Heights Road with a storm sewer pipe under Scenic Heights Road connecting to the ponding area. 2. Prior to final Plat, proponent shall: A. Provide grading, drainage, and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Provide grading, drainage, and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. i 3. Prior to Building Permit issuance, proponent shall: 15J8 t • i Scenic Heights 4 June 22, 1984 A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park fee. B. Notify the City and the Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. C. Submit a street lighting program with lighting details for review. D. Provide plans for review by the Fire Marshall. E. Proponent shall provide an overall development plan, keyed with the j elevations of each unit type, showing that no two similar units ! shall be located side by side, directly across, or diagonally across from each other. s a. 1 ie 1 q� • q!q f . I l519 MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COtVISSION Monday, June 25. 1984 F 1 9 l i. A. SCENIC HCIGHTS, by Kerr Companies, Inc. Request for Zoning District Chango from Rural to R1-9.5 and Preliminary Plat of 9.5 acres into 20 single family lots. Location: Southwest quadrant of Scenic Heights Road and Red Rock Road. A public hearing. t 15�2U . Planning Commission Minutes 2 June 25, 1984 + Mr. Robert Martinson, Kerr Companies, reviewed the request by proponents. He stated that a neighborhood meeting had been held and that they had met with other neighbors on an individual basis, who would be most directly affected by the development. Mr. Jack Lynch, Westwood Planning and Engineering, representing proponent, reviewed the existing vegetation, -topography, surrounding land uses, and other pertinent features of the property. He stated that the average lot size was 14,900 sq. ft., with a density of 2.5 units per acre for the entire site. Mr. Lynch added that the homes would range from $90,000 - $150,000 per unit. Planner Franzen reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 22, 1984, pointing out three specific concerns: 1) In order to connect neighborhoods, a direct access to the west was suggested by Staff, rather than the proposed cul-de-sac; 2) A better transition between existing and proposed lot sizes was suggested. While the average lot size within the Scenic Heights proposal was 14,900 sq. ft., the average lot size within the adjacent Red Rock Hills 2nd Addition was 17,000 sq. ft.; and 3) The sight distances at the intersection with Scenic Heights Road did not appear to be adequate. Chairman Bearman asked why the project had not been proposed for 111-13.5 zoning, instead. Mr. Lynch responded that there were two reasons: 1) Larger homes could be built on a 70 ft. wide lot within an R1-9.5 District than in an 111-13.5 District; and 2) Due to the shape of the property, the northerly lots would not be deep enough to meet the R1-13.5 requirements. Torjesen stated that it was his understanding that the 111-9.5 District was intended to provide for lower cost housing by allowing for smaller homes to be built on smaller lots, therefore reducing the cost of housing,for a portion of the population. lie stated that he did not feel ' it was appropriate to request R1-9.5 zoning for purposes of building larger homes. lie added that, while the proposed project may meet the requirements of the 111-9.5 District, it did not, in his opinion, meet the intent of the R1-9.5 District. Torjesen asked about the zoning of the surrounding properties. Staff responded that the surrounding properties were either R1-13.5 or Rural. Hallett asked if lots would be lost by extension of the westerly cul-de-sac. Mr. Lynch responded that no lots would be lost by this adjustment. Chairman Dearman asked if this proposal would be subject to the requirements of the Shorcland ordinance due to its proximity to the pond. Staff responded that it would not. Mr. John Roller, 15415 Morraine Way, expressed concern about the drainage in this area. Mr. Lynch explained the direction of drainage within the area which would result from the development of the property. Mr. Rullen stated e that he was concerned about damaqi� to the ponding area and wildlife which would take place due to fertilizer draining into the pond. Mr. Martinson stated that they would look at this situation and try to find a solution for it. IYn , Planning Commission Minutes 3 June 25, 1984 MOTION 1: Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Schuck, to close the public hearing. ( Motion carried-4-0-0 MOTION 2: —� Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Schuck, to recommend to the City Council, approval of the request of the Kerr Companies for Zoning District i Change from Rural to R1-9.5 for 9.5 acres, based on plans dated May 9, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 22, 1984, with the added recommendation that proponent investigate possible solutions to the problem of fertilizer polluting the pond and report back to the City. Motion carried--3-1-0 (Torjesen against) MOTION 3: Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Schuck, to recommend to the City Council, approval of the request of the Kerr Companies for Preliminary Plat of 9.5 acres for 20 single family detached lots, based on plans dated May 9, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 22, 1984, with the added recommendation that proponent investigate possible ( solutions to the problem of fertilizer polluting the pond and report back to the City. Motion carried--3-1-0 (Torjesen against) Torjesen stated that he voted against as he did not feel the project met the intent of the R1-9.5 District regarding lower cost housing. He added that he did not, however, have any objections to the Scenic Heights proposal with regard to any other issues. Chairman 8earman asked that Staff research the intent of the R1-9.5 District and report back to the Planning Commission. It was suggested that Staff j prepare language to effect lower cost housing within the R1-9.5 District for i Commission review. (Marhula arrived at 8:30 p.m.) i j� • 1 j UNAPPROVED MINUTES• rnrm 004TRIF PARKS. RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION July 2, 1984 D. Scenic Heights Refer to staff report dated June 22, 1984. Lambert reported that this project consists of one street and a cul-de-sac with 20 proposed lots. He recommends approval of the project per staff report and subject to payment of the cash park fee. MOTION: Schwartz moved to recommend approval of the Scenic Heighfs development per staff report. Breitenstein seconded the motion and it carried. . 7 ' 3 k } If i . yyi CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #84-177 . RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF MIN-TEX, PHASE III I FOR MIN-TEX, TEXAS GENERAL PARTNERSHIP BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Min-Tex, Phase III, for Min-Tex, Texas General Partnership, dated June 22, 1984, consisting of 20.8 acres into one lot, a copy of E which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. d ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of 1984. I. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: i i John D• Frane, City Clerk I n I,,F STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: July 6, 1984 PROJECT: Min-Tex Business Campus, Phase III APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: min-Tex, Texas General Partnership REQUEST: Preliminary Plat of 20.8 acres into one lot. Background At the June 25, 1984 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed build- t 79-37/ ,, 50-2 ing plans for Min-Tex Phase III ' — approximately 57 000 1- ^� 1-2 PR, involving app y , • ARK, square feet of industrial/ warehouse PROPOSED SITE building and a rezoning from Rural '�+ °x• TS • to I-2 Park on approximately 4.65 J� f 1,2' `a- 3 acres of land. Construction of the j� t,5 dRKI 11-7 office/warehouse building would be on Outlet B, which is currently 80 2 1-5 F" owned by the City for drainage 1 12-2 purposes. In order for the City to '' RM-2.5 .'7 f7j convey this land to the proponent, a I , -2 preliminary plat combining Outlot B with Lot 1, Block 1, Shady Oak 5th Addition, would be required. Preliminary Plat 12-1 Prior to final plat approval, a 1 -REG ,;;ry t 2 PKI;, �rl� utility and drainage easement and road easements must be vacated b ! I ` the City. These are indicated by shaded areas on the preliminary F �t_ _ f3C�14 f_ plat. 28-foot and 33-foot drainage 1 and utility easements are proposed ' e� U along the eastern and southern `� } o?N borders of the site. The size of the drainage and utility easement will be governed by the final design anq— ► " " t of the ditch section as approved the � ��%-- P.. v.�� r `�'4 `� MAP P City Engineer. 9 Min-Tex III 2 July 6, 1984 i STAFF RECWOIMENDAT IONS Staff would recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat of 20.8 acres into one lot subject to the following: 1. Prior to Final Plat, proponent shall. age, and erosion control plans to the A. Submit detailed grading, drain f Watershed District for review. B. Submit detailed grading, drainage, and erosion control plans to the City Engineer for review. C. Notify the City and the Watershed 48 hours in advance of grading on i the property. D. Concurrent with final plat approval, proponent shall request the vacation of the drainage, utility, and road easements by the City. I E J i 1 f I i tiFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: June 22, 1984 PROJECT: Min-Tex Business Campus, Phase III APPLICANT & F E 041NER: Min-Tex, Texas General Partnership REQUEST- Site Plan and Zoning Amendment on 18.9 acres of land currently zoned I-2 Park to accommodate a 56,280 square foot office/warehouse building and Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 Park for 4.65 acres Background VHK The Comprehensive Guide Plan identi- 50 , is an Industrial land use for this 79-37••c ", `� " .te and for surrounding land uses. 1 1-2 At previous meetings, the Planning 1d. 1-2NR PRK Commission reviewed development — PROPOSED SITE i 7-9-47-9-4plans for Min-Tex Phase II, and for , p PK. & 3 l Phase IV. jj� {h RK 1-7 The site is relatively level, 1 5 PR graded at the time of previously g •: 80-2 <\t� approval of the Shady Oak 5th �;•, J7 i 12 2 Industrial Park. There is no RM-25 .1_ existing significant natural vegeta- 1-2 F tion on this site. �'\\`\• °<� Site Plan +, — \ fl7.7 The project involves the construe- 1j ( .:qy' 12-1 ` tion of a 56,280 square foot f ., .. F.,.-2 PK.F1413 office/warehouse building on 4.65 t-PC G _ net acres, Building and parking 1 O � :�eu t_t3 12 'KI areas meet minimum setback require- Fl OF ments for I-2 Park zoning. Access / 8p_t4 to this site will be by driveway L r 1-2 from W. 'l0th Street and from Shady // t,_ "W, Oak Road through Min-Tex Phase IV. �.I•� { ! o tL r 'onstruction of the 56,280 sq. ft. \ office/warehouse building will occur On Outlot B, which is currently ARP`A LOGAT101111! MAP Min-Tex Phase III 2 June 22, 1984 zoned Rural, and over which there is a drainage easement owned by the City. To convey this land to the proponent, a preliminary plat, combining Outlot B with Lot 1,-Block 1, Shady Oak 5th Addition, will be required. Staff has discussed this with the proponent. The Commission will review a preliminary plat request at the July 9, 1984, meeting for this purpose. Parking For 56,280 square feet of office/warehouse building, Code would require provision of 156 stalls based upon 28,140 square feet of office at five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area and 28,140 square feet of warehouse area at one-half space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. If figured at three spaces per 1,000 for the overall building, 169 parking spaces would be required. If figured at one-third office, one-third manufacturing, and one-third warehouse, 159 spaces would be required. The proponent is providing 193 spaces. Grading A minimal amount of site grading work is proposed. There are retaining walls along the eastern and southern sides of the site. The retaining walls are required in order to meet grade changes and parking requirements and to provide adequate room for drainage purposes within the proposed 33-foot drainage easement. Specific details identifying the height and type of materials proposed for the retaining wall not been identified. However, due to poor soil conditions, the retaining wall r?. have to be sheet piled in order to prevent the parking area from eroding into the drainage easement. The proponent should provide details of the retaining wall prepared by a registered structural engineer for review by the City. Landscaping A landscape plan has been submitted, which depicts the type, size, and arrangement of plant materials on the site. Shade trees proposed within the 33-foot drainage easement will have to be relocated elsewhere on the site since they can potentially interfere with the hydraulic capability of the ditch for water storage and movement. In addition, the poor soils and the high water table do not provide suitable growing conditions for the ash and maple trees proposed. Shade trees should be relocated within planting islands in the parking areas. This will result in the loss of parking spaces; however, the proponent is providing 35 more spaces than Code requires. Parking areas must be screened from Shady Oak Road. The proponent should provide sight lines showing the effectiveness of the screening proposed. Architecture The proponent has provided building elevations similar to those previously reviewed by the Planning Commission for Phase I, II, and IV of the Min-Tex Business Campus. Primary building materials will be brick, glass, and concrete panels. L,V,MENDAT IONS: Staff would recommend approval of the request for Site Plan and Zoning Amendment of 13.9 acres and Zoning District Change for 4.65 acres from Rural to I-2 Park, subject to the following: Min-Tex Phase III 3 June 22, 1984 1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: _ a i_:cI, :."i"," ::.:,_ is G:RJ ffi!ni; V.::— L Y:t:': A: 'Provide details of* the retaining wall prepared by registered structural engineer for review. B. Revise the landscape plan to remove shade trees from the proposed 33-foot drainage easement to be relocate in planting islands. 99 Proponent shall provide screening of parking areas from Shady Oak Road and shall submit sight lines to show the effectiveness of the screening along Shady Oak Road. C. Submit a preliminary plat combining Outlot B with Lot 1, Block 1, Shady Oak Industrial Park 5th Addition. 2. Prior to final plat, proponent shall: A. Submit detailed grading, drainage, and erosion control plans to the Watershed District for review. B. Submit detailed grading, drainage, and erosion control plans to the City Engineer for review. C. Submit plans for review by the Fire Marshall. D. Notify the City and the Watershed 48.hours in advance of grading on the property. 3. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee. �JcZ-J Planning Commission Minutes 3 June 25, 1984 d . i B. MIN-TEX PHASE III. Request for Site Plan and Zoning District Amendment for 18.9 acres within I-2 Park District. Location: W. 70th Street south of Shady Oak Road and Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 Park for 4.65 acres. A public hearing. Mr. Bernie Frye, proponent, reviewed the third phase of the Min-Tex development, pointing out the surrounding land uses, site characteristics, and how the project related to the other phases of the Min-Tex development. Mr. Frye stated that �t was not their intention to over-design for parking needs, and that the majority of the excess spaces would be converted to green spare. Planner Franzen reviewed the findings and reconenendations of the Staff 1530 Planning Commission Minutes 4 June 25, 1984 Report of June 22, 1984, pointing out that, upon review, it had been determined that a plat would be necessary for this project. Proponent would be returning to the Commission with a platting request at a future date. Torjesen asked if the platting would result in a separate lot, since it had been the original plan of Min-Tex to have all of the structures on one lot. Mr. Frye stated that the lot would be added into the lot with the other structures at the time of platting. Chairman Bearman asked for comments and questions from members of the audience. There were none. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Marhula, seconded by Schuck, to close the public hearing. Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Marhula, seconded by Schuck, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Min-Tex for Site Plan and Zoning District Amendment for 18.9 acres within the I-2 Park District for Min-Tex Phase I1I, based on plans dated June 1, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the { Staff Report dated June 22, 1984. Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Marhula, seconded by Schuck, to recommend to tie City Council approval of the request of Min-Tex for Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 Park for 4.65 acres for Min-Tex_Phase III, based on plans dated June 1, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 22, 1984. Motion carried--5-0-0 l5� CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #84-175 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF MR. JOHN TURNBULL BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Mr. John Turnbull dated September 29, 1983, consisting of 15.28 acres into two lots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADDPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Franc, City Clerk f MINNL50TA IJISTORICAL SOCIETY IUUNUIUIN 1(id'1 IoilSn-'Ilup:IlWoly rnh.r,N.Paid,A1VS.1iIII (bl2)7A,-I171 I� December 9, 1983 Ms. Jean Johnson Zoning Administrator City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 t Dear Ms. Johnson: Pursuant to your request of 30 November, I have attempted to scale out the approximate locations of the 21 prehistoric burial mounds of archaeological site 21 RE 24 in relation to the proposed subdivision of the "Turnbull" property along the Minnesota River bluffs in the SNP, SWk, Section 29, T116N, R22W. To accomplish this reconstruction of the partially ; destroyed mound group, I have re-scaled the mound locations from field data recorded by surveyor Theodore H. Lewis in 1884. The mounds were oriented on your plat in relation to magnetic bearings, observed mound locations in relation to property boundary lines noted in 1982 at the east end of the group, and the two observable mound remnants plotted on the plat by Eden Prairie personnel. That procedure resulted in the map enclosed which suggests that six mounds were situated within the Turnbull parcel. of those, mound 21, the westernmost of the group, has been totally destroyed by construction of the existing house. Mounds 17 and 19 are clearly visible and mounds 16, 18, and 20 are nearly level. Although the t surface features of these mounds have been obscured, it is entirely possible that subsurface burial features may remain intact. You will. note that this reconstruction (which may have an error factor without further field c1.,cking of: 20 feet or so) suggests that the proposed residence is located within approximately 15 feet of the original location j of mound 16. i 1 It is, thus, quite apparent that this matter must be addressed under the auspices of Minnesota statute 307.08 for the protection of burial. grounds. 1 To expedite this consideration, I have forwarded copies of this reconstruc- tion to christy Caine, State Archaeologist, and Eirl Sargent of the Minnesota Indian Affairs Intertribal Bonrd since they represent the offices charged with implemcntati.on of that law. I hope that these data have aided you in your review of the matter. if I may be of fuf:ther as;;i:;tamfcc, please act me know. Sincerely, T.c:a is 11. Petcr:on Trunl; llighway Archaeologist 1xv:l t ?. cc: Chrl:;l.y calve E;u l Sart;,nt Attachment 1.'3 , pa( C 1,of 2 � 1 • 1 F 1 • 1. in lUJ errs \ r- j i - I"=100' "1 _ M1 r .(j y i Attactm ent R 3, Page 2 of C � Law 011lcoS of KHASS,('+'iLYER,KANNING&WALSTE.N..._. t Chartered Suite:+UO Phillip 11.Kress P.W.9.1. Wtschall[toad Ocnaer Daffy K.IAcyor s.+.^M.urewn .Q1 Soon+At;u:.cnau goad Phlllp T.Kenning Dunce J.N�nsuom p.0.lion M Trovor n.Walston Sn;+kn eo,Id,nnc50,a 55379 (Gl^)445 bu8° March Z 1 1984 Ms. Jea:r. Johnson Zocing Administrator City Offi.ccs 8950 Eden Prairic Road Gwen i'rairie, wi 55344-2499 Re: Turnbull. Dear Ms. Johnson: ( I represented Norma Turnbull in her divorce action which concluded on September 22, 1983. one of the major family assets was their homestead located at 10001 Dell. Road in Gden Prairie. This property is a 15 acre site on the river bluffs. It was necessary for us to obtain a valuation of this property so that tdrs. Turnbull could be. compensated for her interest in it. As a part of iser who appraised the. value of the 15 acre that. process, we hired an appra site at: approsle1at-01y W0,()001 buL inwicated that if a 5 acre parcel could be broken off,'th'? value wot+lei increase to approximately $200,000. In thaL regard, ve ^ontacLed li;len Prairie City H;tll and were aJv.ined that such a o-:pli.t tiff would ,tot br_ possible, because +nin:Lmum 1OL siLQS are lU acre, and 111is Ccde requirement was sLvlctl.y enforced by the City. I have enclor_,} a CC,py of your letter of AU;;USL. 16, .1983, advisio;, us of this fact in ttritiug. 'riud fact was also co,a:aunicatcd to otir appraiser when lie, called City }call. (You wil). plca::e note that th+' in::ide adwresa in your letter has lx en euvt,.re(l. Tni., was done 411: t:he ti;ae of the divorce haariug to prevent Mr. Turnbull fro,n learilir.;; of his trife's address.) 1?el.yiug on the City's assurance that 111" property could not be sub- divided, ve soltled th.z di:,aolutioll action and 'ia. 'furt1bu11 rece1vt-d other prop,rtie:: vtht•d at appru:a.,aa1<+ly y 5,00t1 Lo satisfy her one-bait interest of the hoe,+°cle:r.l. Mr., Turnbull %:",A awarw ,1 the 110a1cstead .111d 15 acrca. tdr h:tv;'cult b:•co"to awarr that ilr. T111:11bu11 lids applied for a vari.nnce, s,cl:tn, to do pr,;Ctci•1.y vhaL wa 11:1,1 :n .•n a.ivio:ed i!;:t l;t""'r wa;: 1.lrpos::riblc— u;,ia+ly, i.plft. ui! :+ aCr.•.. }:;. 'I•uruooi} Lndirutru tbaC. lh: Cl:nulf,l; and ('+..nl•:e.lou L, ou tho vvr,;C of appr,+rit>; t11, ;lphllr,.t!'ion ;1%1 that it it, a f rrr.ailt; lhlt ti1" CALy C,�trllcil. w}1.} ,;r.m; 1t. /;'35 Ms. Jcan Johw;bn d e 2 March 2, 1984 As yyu can see, if tills variance is granted and Hr. Turnbull is <'tilowed to split off the 5 acres, the property will become worth an additional to my client last summer will have cost bar 45U,OOt), and your representations $25,000, or half of the increased value of the gio��crLy. The purpose of this letter is to express my client's displeasure with made to tier with regard to the splitting of the mit:reprc::entatious that you this property and also to voice tier objecLionS to any variances being granted to*tier ex-husband with regard to flits property. If the variance is granted, she is considering the possibility of coclac:ucing suit against the City for their misrepree:entaLions, when they full well knew that she was going to rely on them Lo Yxer detriuenL, I would request that a copy of this letter be provided to the. Ylanaiug and toning Commission. Yours very truly, KMSS,.HLYER, KANNING & WALSTEN Barry K. •eyer BK?t:pk cc. Eden Prairie City Administrator Norma Turnbull File No, 3-2685-1 Enclosure i • l t City of Eden Prairie Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 May 17, 1984 Gentlemen: As requested by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, I have taken the following steps to conform with their desires. A declaration to protect the Indian Mounds has been granted. Approximately 5 acres out of the 7.35 acres has been given to the City for a scenic easement, probably the first of a kind for a bluff lot. 95% of the property will be left undisturbed; grading will not be on the steep slope, but on slopes of less than 5%. Construction will begin upon house pending City approval. If variance is not granted by July 1 of 1984, then construction will begin as of April of 1985. All property owners have deeded right to driveway. We have a gentlemen's agreement among ourselves for drive maintenance, and. it has worked well for many years. The existing zoning is rural, and the property meets all setback and zoning requirements except for the present 10-acre rule. Most of the area has been laid out in re parcels. Since L 3' 77. • 3 MEMO T0: Board of Appeals and Adjustments FRO14: Jean Johnson, Toning Administrator DATE: December 27, 1983 RE: January 12, 1933 meeting.- I. VARIA(dCES A. VARIANCE RE:(1UEST ll 84-01, JOHI__ y A_TURNBULL`DELL ROAD 1. BACY.6R0lIEJD Mr. Turnbull has submitted a letter of request for dividing his parcel of property for the purpose of constructing another residential building upon a 7.37 acre Rural zoned lot. Along with the letter he has supplied the following: a lot survey, a 10 foot interval topography and a proposed location for a new house. The County property tax records and staff computations indicate that Mr. Turnbull's parcel is approximately 15.2II acre in size. With this information it revises his variance request to a 5.28 acre lot size. tor. Turnbull has been notified of the difference and requested to have his survey rechecked. The variance notice was published for a 5+ acre sized lot. s Mr. Turnbull's property is located in southwestern Eden Prairie along the Minnesota River Valley Bluffs. The prop- erty is zoned Rural District which has a 10 acre minimum lot size. The proponent has not supplied the City with any plans for: the type of foundation, method to control erosion of the sandy steep soils during and after construction, or driveway location and grades proposed. The 5.28 acre lot does contain steep slopes and therefore may be subject to steep slope ground review by City Connissions y prior to any construction upon any steep slope ground. See atttachment #I. City sewer and %•rater is not available to the site. No plans for Mrivate sewer and rater, information as to the capability of this lot to sustain a private, system nor proximity to existing systems is submitted. In octobcr of '. 1.1r. Turnbull approached City Staff rc- garding division of his Marcel. Presently, there is one 0-31 !Servo - December 27,*1983 a. house on the parcel. lie was advised that the minimum lot size in the Rural District is 10 acres. Therefore, according to Code, his parcel is permitted 1 residential structural and any division or platting less than 10 acres in size{ (Ile in- itially inquired about division of the parcel into tv:o•5 acre lots and one 7 acre lot) must be accompanied with a ,- ;. .,. ,var.iance. .Also discussed..0 th Mr. Turnbull was the option of him applying through the City's Platting and/or Planned Unit Development process. Through a PUD process., he.could request approval of a lot division of the parcel and propose a scenic easement over the steep sensitive bluff area. The exact location of an easement area would be reviewed by City Commissions and de- cided by the City Council. Scenic Easements are recommended by the U.S. fish and Wildlife Service and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as contained in the Compre- hensive Plan for the Minnesota Valley Rational Wildlife Refuge. Mr. Turnbull considered the PUD application process. On November 21, 1983, he notified staff that he was applying . for the variance process on a 7.37 acre division from the 17 acre parcel. The variance application is the first step in achieving a land division. In December, Mr. Turnbull was notified to recheck his survey as records on file indicate the parcel to be approximately 15 acres in size. { After variance approval, which is subject to City Council review and approval, Mr. Turnbull will have to apply for and receive approval of a plat. If the parcel is only 15.28 acres in size the undersized lot will be•5.28 acres, a 53% variance. The 1967 base survey done by F. C. Jackson for Mr. TuLpbull was not submitted to the City for plat approval. Tht: two ) exce,:tio ns at the east and west sides were divided off his property by administrative divisions. The City Ordinance in effect at that time required a 5 acre minimum lot size. 2. f.XISTING CONDITIONS � Access The 5.28 acre proposed lot has 330t feet of frontage along U.S. 169. An access from U.S.169 to the proposed house location viould entail crnlstructing a drive 900+ feet in length and driving grades of 20417. (Topography attached) A drive from 169 could nut he corrstr•ucted unless tire. owner e obtained a Stecp Slope CrOUnd aPProval iron, the City and an access permit from the State highway Dep_u•tm:.nt. Such a drive access is 110t recon;mended. In lieu of it driveway of this length and steepness, Mr. Turnbull prr,hoses to provirlr, access to thr new lot from the west over 3 other propert.ivs to reach Dell (toad. { OF I t�enio - December 27, 1983 Page 3 Presently this driving lane is i800 feet long and serves 4 different homes. The City is not aware of any filed document outlining all parties' responsibilities for. access, maintenance and upgrading. The current condition of the 1800 foot drive is: plowed to a 9 foot width, does not allow 2 way traVfic and is undersized from the 20' diiilimum width an anergcncy:vehicle would need. f Additional dependence upon this inadequate access could be hazardous in an emergency. See attachment N2. Also of concern froin a public safety standpoint is that no turn around is provided. s 3. INDIAN MOUNDS Along the Minnesota River Valley Bluffs, Indian burial mounds are located. The area east of Dell Road, across this property, has the highest concentration of mounds within the City of Eden. The City is required by State Statute to cooperate with State Agencies in protective identified Indian Mounds. Prior to the house construction on the 7.41 acre lot to the east, the owner, Dr. Allis, was required to file Declarations of Cove- nants, which run with the land, outling protection of the mounds on the property. (Example attached) Mr. Turnbull has been made aware of this requirement and f requested to submit as part of his application a draft document to be reviewed and approved by the City, State Historical Society, and other necessary agencies. See �.'. attachment #3 for the location of Indian Mounds. 4. FINDINGS 1. The proposed lot "size is undersized from the 10 acre minimum lot size required by Code requirements by-.53ti (based upon 5.28 AC). . i. 2. Private access 110D feet long and of insufficient width for emergency vehicles jeopardizes health, safety, and welfare. 3. A driveway from U.S. 169 would require Steep Slope Ground review and approval and additional grading of the bluffs is something the City is trying to avoid in support of the Finnesota River Valley Comprehensive Plan. 4. 0„:ner has not danonstrated that the. parcel as is, is not a reasonable existing use of the land. 5. Owner has not cic�,nonstrated a hardship in order to sub- stantiate the.division of an existing canfoi7aing lot size into a substandard lot size. 1 Memo - December 27, 1983 Page 4 6. To date information as to the following has not been submitted: a) Distances to existing private systems from proposed private systems. b) Filed access easement protecting all parties. c) Declarations to be filed to protect the Indian mounds. The Planning Staff recommends denial of the request for variance to divide 5.28 acres off a 15.28 acre lot based upon the following: 1. A 5.28 acre lot is inconsistent with City Code requiring a minimum 10 acre lot size. 2. No public access via dedicated right-of-way nor scenic easement over the steep erodable bluffs have been proposed. 3. The private controlled access out to Dell Road is not in the interest of the public's health, welfare and safety. 4. A hardship as to the need for variance has not been demonstrated. 5. Information as to the protection of identified Indian Mounds has not been submitted. The above findings and recommendations also apply if the property isl7+ "`; acres and a 7± acre lot size variance is requested. t T C ^'.r �:?J'T�� E/� r It t`rJ {• �r^' t.r t�'r1 +Y'f}�.;:v�I� 1`r,7' _, t\'. f 1 % �..\;yt� °f/ � /' 1 , r�r{. -` a n �• t r �,,�,� l try , /� � ��:• . ,. � Y r. - '. h ( 1a v ♦ _� f.�., ,}'a, 1.-,�'� y. !if .)`�J,�\ v-: •—•�„ .iy'� ± .r v g� �cY ;. ,S r� ,—�,` � /".1-�..`�� _��j.,.t •�r,•,i „.A, r4 t > �\laj!•�W, rSr�•r> ',` �� ,_ `El � I(j.�t ` E-��^+ 'n7r r,✓ '!1 tii, � ♦'. �. .t. r-}.�� 7 ti��t• � \ �• tr ��ti•.i �� l '�.1• •i ' LAQ Cil � it �_ \Q�. t �� II�' � r �`�� ' a •!•, • /% �`. \ .S •`,t ,r-,�1 �.1 i '�'. J Off' \ •' , • ...u` . { , 1 ' �, Attachment N1 k . ,. �. •• _� ,•� /• a\i. topOc)1'ilphy 10 foot intervals _,' _�:�__-�:___t..• ••-�` n 4 0 o 6aogaoN V`p a 6aagaoN t Y 0 • o a •t-ta sel6nop � N ! 1 ( } 4R stilt/ F U M1J Y aal6uaM a > Ln N N60 It, 61 iLin ♦141 c a v :z LLCl�S1Pj•� •pp; Board of Appeal and Adjustments FROM: Sandra-F. Werts, Recreation Supervisor 1} Staff Liaison, HistorVj i Y Cultural Commission DATE: January 18, 1984 SUBJECT: Indian Mounds on Turnbull property proposals that may affect Theliistorical and Cultural Commission reviews all properties with historic significance to the comnn�nity• They recently reviewed the request by Mr. John Turnbull to subdivide his property along Dell Road. the Commission is concerned with preserving what remains of the Indian Burial Hounds in Eden prairie, and would like to see owners of property with mounds add a:lifelong protective covenant to the property title. The Coninission made the following motion at their January 5, 1984 meeting: MOTION: It was moved by Marshall and seconded by Richter to support the planning Staffs recommendation for a declaration of covenant if a variance is granted to Turnbull. 111c motion passed unanimously. Sphind MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services ��I DATE: June 28, 1984 SUBJECT: • Supplementary Staff Report to the June 22 Planning Staff Report .on Turnbull Subdivision Attached to this memo is the June 22, 1984 Planning Staff Report regarding Mr. Turnbull's request to plat 15.2 acres into to lots. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission is reviewing this proposal due to the location of this project. The Planning Staff Report outlines quite clearly the concerns the City has with approving lots less than 10 acres in the rural area, and the additional concerns With small lots on the Minnesota River. Valley Bluffs. The Planning Commission reviewed this proposal on June 25th and recommended approval based on the May 1, 1984 plans and subject to the recommendations .of the Planning ( Staff Report of June 22, 1984. The Community Services staff concur with the Planning Commission recommendation mainly because the major City concerns regarding safe access and preservation of the bluffs through a scenic easement would be accomplished under this recommenda- tion. BL:md ells CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE VARIANCE f! 84-01 BOARD OF APPEALS AND AWUSl lift[ITS F I NLORDER RE: Petition of John A. Turnbull ADDRESS; 10001 Dcll Road VARIANCE kEQUEST:`To emit ptattinq of. a lot 74- acres in size. City Code regvires parcels of not less than 10 acres. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments for the City of Eden Prairie at a regular (special) meeting thereof duly considered the above petition and after hearing and examining all of the evidence presented and the-file j therein does hereby find and order as follows: 1. All procedural requirements necessary for the review of said i variance have been met. (YES x NO ). 2. There are circumstances unique to the property under consideration, ¢ and granting such variance does not violate the spirit and intent of the City's Zoning and platting Code. 3. Variance Request 41_84-01 is herein Granted x Denied 4. Conditions to the granting_ x Denial , of said variance are as follows. 1) Applicant must apply for and receive apprptyal of a �1at• application consr ,tent }•11th_tie valiance approval WI t—Iun one_yc�_r_—._— 2) Applicant agrees to file the follotring doCLnnent$ concurrent with the apt) ication_and_hrior to_�}ny huil_ding }hermit: a) Declarations to protect the Indian mounds located upon the i _ Proper ty_ ------------- — b) Scenic casement over the steep slope area of the property. The_ hove docuoents shallmeet frith the a��provaI of the city and othc+ nccessei-y agencies. — 5. This variance shall be revoked within 15 days after notice of failure to meet the required.conditions has been given. ti G. A copy of this order shall be forwarded to the applicant by the City clerk. ! 7. This order shall be effective Feb_. 9,_in'4 _; however, this variance shall lapse and be of no effect utilcss the erection { or al ter•al.i onS permi tteci shall occur within one (1) year of the i effective dat.e unless said period of time is extended pursuant to the appropriate procedures prior to the expiration of one year from the effective date hereof. 8. All Board of Adjust+ncnts and Appeals actions are subject to City Council rreiew. (iOAitD 01' A1'I'LAl S Atli) AD.It!S Wf.tI IS�• BY �� DA"11*0: Feb 9, STAFF REPORT T0: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: June 22, 1984 PROJECT: Turnbull Subdivision APPLICANT & FEE OWNER: John Turnbull REQUEST: Preliminary Plat of 15.28 acres into two lots Background: The Comprehensive Guide Plan des- ignates this site and surrounding land areas for a Rural land use, , 4 with a minimum lot size of ten acres. The site is located along the Minnesota River bluffs, with _� PROPOSED SITE access by a private driveway from Dell Road. There is an existing house located in the central portion of the site at the top of the bluffs. The northern one-quarter of the site is relatively level. From a high point ac• :.:; at elevation 890, the land drops quickly by approximately 140 feet to an elevation of 750 adjacent to Highway #t169. Provisions of the steep slope ordinance apply in this � _ s situation. The site is heavily �" �"� '�' "• ^ �^�, e wooded with oak as the dominant tree r type. The Hennepin County general soil classification indicates soil types to be primarily sand and 'c ,� 1• `.Z, gravel. t ' At their February 9, 1984, meeting, the Board of Appeals approved a lot t 1 i .ei� size variance request for John Turnbull to permit the platting of a '"' � +� A p A A A LOCH B C(Di I NI "iP 5.28-acre lot, with conditions � � n requiring a conservation easement to i ' - protect the existing Indian mounds, t, �_.._...�..__,.,._,...._. . _..�.-• •�•� ,�•^- -•' )tjt�� f Turnbull Subdivision 2 June 22, 1984 scenic easements over the steep slope area of the 5.28-acre lot, and receipt of approval of a plat application consistent with the variance approval within one year. Rural Service Area Mr. Turnbull's property is located outside bf -tile MUSA (Metropolitan Urban Service Area) line within the Rural Service Area as depicted on the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The property is zoned Rural, with a ten-acre minimum lot size. The Rural District has a large minimum lot size for many reasons which may include any, or all, of the following for a particular parcel: 1. To encourage development in the urban service area where the City has invested heavily to provide a variety of services which include sewer, water, flood control, improved roads, schools, and police and fire protection. 2. To preserve large areas of open space in areas of unique and scenic beauty such as large woodland areas, steep slopes, and the bluff areas. 3. To discourage "leap-frog" development and premature extension of City services before the land area is ready to develop. 4. To minimize pollution by limiting the number of septic tanks. 5. To allow areas for Rural land uses to occur such as farming, gardening, and raising of livestock and other farm animals. The general character of the Rural area in [den Prairie is a combination of single family homes on large lots, farming, and open space. Lots near the Turnbull site vary between 3-20 acres in size. Many of the lots smaller than ten acres were created prior to the ordinance change in September of 1982. Prior to 1982, the minimum lot size was five acres. Attachment A shows ownership, lot size, and the date the property was assessed for taxation purposes. Pre11Ein3 Plat The proponent has submitted a preliminary plat involving the subdivision of approximately 15.28 acres into two lots, a ten-acre lot, and a 5.2-acre lot. The proponent has previously been informed of specific information required for Rural area subdivisions and sites involving steep slope review. General information has been supplied which indicates the existing topography and general location of the proposed building, grading limits, and . septic tank locations. The following information should be submitted for Staff review, including: 1. Topography of the site which includes both existing and proposed grades, specifically proposed grading within construction areas around the household and driveway. 2. Method of restoring disturbed areas. 3. Proposed setback location from property lines, and preliminary housing designs. p Turnbull Subdivision 3 June 22, 1984 4. Suitability of soils for well and septic tanks. Access The proposed 5.28-acre lot. has 330 feet of frontage along Highway #169. An access from Highway #169 to the proposed house location would require the construction of a private driveway of approximately 900 feet"in length, with grades between 20-27 percent. A drive from Highway #169 could not be constructed unless the owner obtained a steep slope approval from the City and an access permit from the State Highway Department. Because of the extent of grading work and impact on the bluffs, such a driveway access is not recommended. Mr. Turnbull proposes to provide access from Dell Road across four other properties to this site. Presently, this driving lane is 1,800 feet long and serves four different homes. The preliminary plat shows a 33-ft. road easement across the northern property line. The City is not aware of any file document indicating the existence of the easement, or provisions which outline party responsibilities for access, maintenance, and upgrading. The driveway is graded to a nine-foot width, which does not allow adequate room for two-way traffic and for emergency vehicle access. Emergency vehicles require a twenty-foot minimum width. In addition, at the end of this driveway, there is no provision for a turn-around, which makes maneuverability difficult, if not impossible, for emergency vehicles. Better access should be provided to this site. Access can be provided in two ways: One alternative would be to provide access from a public street. This road could follow the present alignment of the driveway from Dell Road to Beverly Drive. This would provide adequate width for two-way traffic and emergency vehicles, plus an east-west connection between Dell Road and Eden Prairie Road. Maintenance would be provided by the City. A second alternative would be to provide access to this site by a 24-ft wide private road. Should this alternative be pursued, the proponent should verify the existence of the 33-ft. easement and provide a file document which outlines party responsibilities for access, maintenance, and upgrading of the road. Indian Mounds Indian burial mounds are located along the Minnesota River Valley bluffs. The area east of Dell Road, across this site, has the highest concentration of mounds within the City of Eden Prairie. The City is required by State Statute to cooperate with State agencies in protecting identified Indian mounds. Prior to house construction on the seven-nlus-acre lot to the cast, the present owner was required to file declarations of covenants, running with the land, outlining the protection of mounds on the property. The site plan indicates the current location of the Indian burial mounds. � Scenic Easem^nts This site is located within the bluff area of Eden Prairie and part of the Minnesota Valley wildlife Refuge study area. Thict study recommended that scenic easements be established over the bluff areas with exact locations to be reviewed by City Commissions and decided by the City Council. The site plan indicates a scenic Turnbull Subdivision 4 June 22, 1984 easement over the 5.28-acre lot. The scenic easement boundary does not cross the ten-acre parcel to the west. It is Staff's understanding that this parcel has been sold to another party. The City has not approved this ten-acre division. The proponent should provide a scenic easement previously across the ten-acre parcel. Conclusions The Staff Report raises issues relative to consistency with Rural area land use and zoning, access, conservation easements, and scenic easements. If it is determined that the subdivision request is in keeping with the overall intent and purpose of the Rural area, then Staff would recommend that approval be based on the following conditions to be completed prior to final plat approval and building permit issuance: 1. Dedication of 33 ft. of road right-of-way along the north property line. This would provide an easement for possible future road construction and enough area to provide for two-way traffic and emergency vehicle access. 2. Provision of a 33-ft. road easement from Dell Road to this site and a document to be filed, outlining party responsibility for access, maintenance, and upgrading. 3. Construction of a 24-ft. wide private road from Dell Road to the east property line of this site and a turn-around for emergency vehicles. 4. Provision of conservation easements to protect the existing Indian mounds. 5. Provision of scenic easements across the bluff areas of both lots as determined by Staff. 6. Provision of a grading plan showing proposed grades and the methods of restoring disturbed areas, preliminary housing plans, and a soils report, indicating suitability of soils for wells and septic systems. RECOIMBIDATIONS: Staff would recommend any of the following alternative courses of action: 1. The Commission could recommend approval of the subdivision request based on plans Staff-dated May 1, 1984„ subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 22, 1984; or, 2. The Commission could return the subdivision request to the proponent for revisions per the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 22, 1984; or, 3.. The Commission could recommend denial of the subdivision request, based on lack of appropriate access and inconsistency with Rural land use regulations. ISSO (1974) 695 15 Dg ) . \ A#m £9, ' } i \ m 30.82 , � . _ �-1 0 _ ' rs&n . (l971)9.lI azl — © . S. Turnbull . D. \e ] ] § ) / ; 2 , ) / . 'tn . ' \ } 19.00 20 e (I ®9 3) Q9a} \ > ®ml® m} 7.24 D9 ! ) (1974)� . \ ( \ { Allis 17) Douglas & _ 12.20 (1974 0 . ) 7 . } kr&g # 20.00 \ (1973) _ . . � r N ` C 2 19.25 Q m � \ o (196 ) � Im > } { � } I.21 4.44 2.6! ■.IO , DsQl7gO%Q � E9 ELCM�:N- } C. TURNBULL. Request for Preliminary Plat of approximately 15.0 acres Tnto two lots for Rural housing development. Location: North of Highway #169, east of Dell Road. A public hearing. Chairman Rearman asked that a letter receive on behalf of Mrs. Norma Turnbull, from her attorney, be made a part of the record on this project. Mr. John Turnbull reviewed his request for a preliminary plat with the Commission. There was a discrepancy noted regarding the amount of acreage involved in this project. Mr. Turnbull stated that he owned 17.38 acres; Staff noted that the County tax records indicated 15.38 acres. Mr. Turnbull gave a brief history of the development of his property over the years from the original 30+ acre site to the acreage at its current size. He pointed out that he had made a request for platting of the entire property into five-acre lots prior to the ordinance requirement being 5hccn Planning Commission Minutes 5 June 25, 1984 changed to ten acres minimum in a Rural District. The plat had never been finalized. Planner Franzen reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 22, 1984. Torjesen expressed concern that approval of this plat would set a precedent for platting within the Rural District which allowed for undersized lots. Mr. Turnbull stated that he had no objections to granting of the scenic easements requested, nor to the easements required over the Indian burial mounds. These easements had already been signed and provided to the City. Hallett asked about the road shared by several property owners in the area. Planner Franzen explained that a driveway existed, which accessed Dell Road, and serviced several homes in the area. He stated that the City had no record of a driveway easement dealing with maintenance and use of the driveway. One of the recommendations of the Staff Report was that this type of easement be filed with the City to prevent any problems in the future. Marhula asked how the maintenance of the road was handled at this time. Mr. Turnbull responded that there was a "gentlemen's agreement" between the four property owners. } f Torjesen stated that he was concerned that the road be upgraded for safe usage by the property owners, as well as have safe access at Dell Road. MOTION I- Motion was made by Torjesen, seconded by Schuck, to close the public hearing. Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Schuck, seconded by Hallett, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of John Turnbull for preliminary plat of approximately 15.0 acres into two lots for Rural use, based on plans dated May 1, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 22, 1984, with the following changes: Item #3 shall be deleted; Item 1.1'2 shall be changed to read a 20 ft. wide easement, instead of a 33 ft. wide easement. Motion carried--3-2-0 (Chairman Bearman and Torjesen against) Chairman Beat-man and Torjesen stated they voted against based on the potential for setting precedents for other Rural properties to plat their property into undersized lots. V. NEW BUSINESS None. i . 'r APPROVED MINUTES BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTRENTS THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 1934 7:30 PM, ADMINISTRATION BLDG. BOARD OF APPEALS MEMBERS: Chairman Ron Krueger, Richard Lynch, Roger Sandvick, Janes Dickey, and s Hanley Anderson BOARD STAFF: Zoning Administrator Jean Johnson, and Recording Secretary, Lynda Diede ROLL CALL: Sandvick and Anderson were absent. I. MINUTES : A. Minutes of January 12, 1984. Dickey moved, seconded by Lynch, to approve the minutes of January 12, 1934. Motion carried unanimously. a II. VARIANCES A. Request aR4-01, suberitted_hy_John A. Turnbull for�rpperty- 1 loc<rtecl it _10001 1rc11 (toad. TIe request is for a varr�nce fra» y_Codc, Cha—r ll, Section 11_U:i. Sued. ?_ and Scctinn ---— - -- 11.10, Subd_2, to_)�ea_mii_j)la ttirig_of a lot 5+ acres in size. City Code,reeiir�»±'cels of not less than 1�0 acres. John Turnbull, 10001 Dell Road, presented his proposal to the Board. He proposes to divide his 17.37 acre property and construct another building on a 7.37 acre rural zoned lot.. ' Johnson ad6ed that County property tax records show that Turnbull's parcel is approximately 15.23 acres in size. Turnbull said that the property was laid out for five acre parcels as required by Code in 19G7, but was not submitted to the City for plat approval. Johnson stated that the access to the homes is of an inadequatc . width for emergency vehicles. 'f lynch inquired if it was a road or a driveway. Johnson said that it was a drivevwy, it is not plowed by the City. f Johnson stated that: Turnbull may need to obtain a Steep Slope j Ground roval fro+n the City. Turnbull noted that the pro- 1 posed house is on the flat top of the hill and drive access will bc. from the north. j Board of Appeals and Adjustments - 2 - February 9, 1984 is A Lynch questioned the location of the Indian mounds and how q they would be dealt with. Turnbull stated that the house is 15' away from the two mounds that are visible. He added that he will file covenants to protect the Indian mounds. i The Board reviewed the memo of the Historical and Cultural Connission %�:hich supports the Planning Staff's recommendation k for a protective covenant to the property title, in regard to the preservation of Indian mounds. . ;l Lynch inquired why Turnbull didn't submit his survey for t approval 17 years ago. Turnbull stated that he wasn't sure + how quickly tie would sell the parcels. 1 Dickey inquired if he planned to live in the new proposed house. Turnbull replied yes. Lynch commented that no public access via dedicated right-of- way, nor scenic easement over the steep erodible bluffs had been proposed. Krueger stated his preference for a scenic easement across the steep bluffs. Lynch believed that the proposed 5t acre division is not dis- '. imilar to some nearby lots. Dickey asked if the City wanted access to the Indian mounds. Johnson replied that the City would like protection for the mounds. No access is required. Referring to the proposed private access, Dickey inquired as to the responsibilities of the City. Johnson stated that public safety, fire safety and emergency vehicles need approximately 20' in width for access. The 1800' private access to this and I other existing homes is plowed to'a 9' width. t Dickey asked at what time in the process covenants would have 4 to be submitted. Johnson stated that it is usually required with final platting and prior to building permit issuance. Turnbull asked if he would need to get a plat for the lot. Johnson replied yes. Krueger inquired if anyone in the audience had questions or comments. tone were raised. r iOTION: Lynch made a motion to approve Variance Request j 4 811-01, submitted by John Turnbull with tiie i following findin(.1s: • 1) Proponent had done a preliminary survey with 5 acre parcels laid out. 2) Applicant 191-ces to file the followin, docu- mcnts coric.u•rcnt with the Alit application and prior to any building Permits: j i Board of Appeals anil Adjustments - 3 - February 9, 1984 a) Declarations to protect. the Indian mounds located upon the property. b) Scenic easements over the steep slope area of the property. The above documents shall meet with approval of the City and other necessary agencies. 3) The lot size-request is not disimilar to existing property in the area. 4) The applicant must apply for and receive approval of a plat application consistent with variance approval within one year. Dickey seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimouSly. Dickey added that the property is unique in character. The placement of the proposed house appears acceptable on the pro- j perty. B. Recnest #84-07, submitted by Ron Krueger &.Associates Inc. for proper Ly_loc mtt d at 7455 Mor Fet Place Drive, leglly described as Lot l lflocf, l,—ltryant Lake Center. _Flit, request. is for a v�rtancc: freer Ciiy (ocfe, Chapter 11, Section 11.U3, Suhd. 2,_ to dghrov(1. r ear_yard setbacks of Ci_24 feet: & II.84 feet instead of the re1iirc.cf lU feet. -- The background of the site was reviewed. The property is zoned Conniercial Regional Service. Construction began in the fall of 1993. The building has not been placed on or in the 5' utility easement area, but does encroach into the rear yard. No drtrimrental conditions to surrounding lots was raised. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Dickey made a motion to approve Variance Request � #84-07, submitted by Ron Krueger and Associates. Lynch seconded the motion. Motion carricd••-2-0=1. Krueger abstained. C. Request FM. 08, submitted by Undcstad Investments for j).rg�cr� locate,' at 8t)95 Glen Larre. 11hc rf nrest is for• a variance from _Ci tv Cnd,, t h ipter l l, Sec ti m 1 I 0 i Subd Z_ to jiermi t co_n- structiml of .0 instead of the i�cquirccl �t(I loot_.naxirnna_ hctir,ht.•------ ----� Tim Caslrin, representing Undcstad Investments, outlined his request. Ile reviewed the site plans with the Board. They propose to Construct a brick, lout• story, 48' hinh, bank and office huildin(t. The location is within the Hen Glen PUD. other nmilIA-story office. and rental dcveiot:nunt is anticipated. Projects nearby are of a simiiar height. �`1d� UNAPPROVED MINUTES -: EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION .tutu o loon a: • a C. Turnbull _ .. . Refer to staff report dated June 22, 1984 and memo dated June 28, -1984 from Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services. Lambert reported that the reason this proposal is being reviewed is because of the location of the project. Lambert stated that the City is concerned with approving lots less than 10 acres in rural.areas and especially on the river bluffs. Lambert recommends approval of two lots, 5.2 and 10'acres, which is the lower two-thirds of this area, subject to the providing of a scenic easement and safe access to lots and homes in the area. to JLv.UJv Der acre, MOTION: Breitenstein_ moved to recommend approval of Turnbull's request per Planning Commissionrecommendatiant.' Jessen seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. _ Baker asked about the Indian•mounds located along the bluffs.. Lambert said an archeological study has been done by the Minnesota Historical Society and these mounds are not to be disturbed. TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: John D. Frane, Finance Director DATE: July 12, 1984 RE: Multi-family Housing Bonds for Edenvale Apartments II Resolution # 84-178 - $2,750,000 The project of 70 units is located south-east of Edenvale Apartments and is correctly zoned for the intended use. Edenvale II is a partnership of Sidney Bader and Zollie Baratz who were involved in the original Edenvale Apartments Project. The hearing is more a planning type of hearing in that the Council finds that this project meets the housing section goals of the guideplan (Resolution No. 84-178). The issuance of housing bonds is outside of the City's M.I.D.B. cap. JDF:bw 7/12/84 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA Application for Industrial Development Bond Project Financing 1. APPLICANT: a'. Business Name.- Eden Investments Partnership b. Business Address - 6005 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis,-MN 55426 c. Business Form (corporation, partnership, sole proprietor- . Ship, etc.) - Partnership d. State of Incorporation or organization - Minnesota 4. e. Authorized Representative - Sidney Bader f. Phone - 544-5228 2. NAtIE(S) AND ADDRESSES OF MAJOR STOCKHOLDERS OR PRINCIPALS: a. Sidney Bader - 8938 South Minnehaha Circle, Minneapolis, MN 55426 b. Zollie Baratz - 3412 oakridge Road, #306, Minnetonka, +IN 55343 . t C. -1- 3. GIVE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF BUSINESS, PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS, ETC: Apartment Rentals 4. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT r a. Location and intended use: Valley View and Mitchell Road b. Present ownership of project site: Edenvale Apartments, a Minnesota General Partnership onsisting of Sidney Bader and Zollie Baratz } c. Names -and address of architect, engineer, and general contractor: Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects Bar-Ett Construction Co. s i 5. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST FOR: Land $ 150,000 �. Construction Contracts 2,370,000 Equipment Acquisition and installation* 200,000 Architectural and Engineering 70,000 Legal 30,000 Interest during Construction 200,000 q Bond Reserve Contingencies 100,000 Loan Fees 30,000 Other 50,000 Total $ 3,200,000 , *Heating and air conditioning should be included as building costs. Indicate the kind of equipment to be acquired here. . • 1 a!�0 . 6. BOND ISSUE - ' a. Amount of proposed bond issue - $2,750,00 b. Proposed date of sale of bond - September. 1, 1984 c. Length of bond issue and proposed maturities - 15 years d. Proposed original purchaser of bonds - First Minneapolis e. Name and address of suggested trustee - k First Trust Co. of St. Paul 332 Minnesota Street St. Paul, MN 55101 f. Copy of any agreement between Applicant and original purchaser - None g. Describe any interim financing sought or available - a i None }. h. Describe nature and amount of any permanent financing } in addition to bond financing None 7. BUSINESS PROFILE a. Are you located in the City of Eden Prairie? Sid trader and Zollie Baratz each are 10% partners/owners of the 174 unit apartment complex called Edenvale Apartments b. Number of employees in Eden Prairie? 8 employees at Edenvale Apartments i. Before this project: -3- ii. After this project? 3 more employees at new complex c. Approximate annual sales — $500,000 Annual Gross Rents i d. Length of time in business Sidney' Bader - 20 years Zollie Baratz - 30 years in Eden Prairie 2 ears e. Do you have plants in other locations? If so, where? NA t, f. Are you engaged in international trade? ( No g. OTHER INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPI'[ENT PROJECT(S): a, List the name(s) and location(s) of other industrial development project(s) in which the Applicant is the owner or a substantial user" of the facilities or a "relented person within the meaning of Section 103(b)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code. EDEN INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP has no other projects. Sidney Bader and Zollie Baratz are each owners/partners in: Edenvale Apartments, 174 units, Eden Prairie, MN - 10% partners each; Aspenwoods of Eagan, 162 units, Fagan, MN - 50% partners each; Park Dill Apartments, 70 units, St. Louis Park, MN - 25% partners each. P. p -I1- / b. List all cities in which the Applicant has requested industrial revenue development financing. None c. Detail the status of any request the Applicant bas before any other city for industrial development revenue financing. None d. List any city in which the Applicant has been refused industrial development revenue financing. None e. List any city (and the project name) where the Applicant has acquired preliminary approval to proceed but in which final approval authorizing the financing has been denied. None /503 S. If Applicant has been denied industrial development revenue financing in any other city as identified in (d) or (e), specify the reason(s) for the denial and the name(s) of appropriate city officials who have knowledge of the transaction. • 1. None 1 9. NAVES AND ADDRESS OF: a. Underwriter (If public offering) N/A b. Private Placement Purchaser (If private placement) First Minneapolis i. If lender will not commit until City has passed its preliminary resolution approving the project, submit a letter from proposed lender that it has an interest in the offering subject to appropriate City approval and approval of the Commissioner of Securities. First Minneapolis MHFA b. Bond Counsel - Holmes & Graven C. Corporate Counsel - Meshbesher., Singer & Spence d. Accountant - Dave Lurie 10. WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR: a. Construction start - 9/1/84 b, Construction completion - 9/l/85 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronald Kelner .544-5228 Scott Bader 544-5228 The undersigned Applicant understands that the approval or disapproval by the City of Eden Prairie for Industrial•: Development bond financing does not expressly or implied constitute any approval, variance, or waiver of any provision or requirement relating to any zoning, building, or other rule or ordinance of the City of Eden Prairie, or any other law applicable to the property included in this project. Eden Investments Partnership Applicant By J r jul.v 3, 1984 Dte l,J,`J -7- CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE RESOLUTION NO. ADOPTING A HOUSING BOND PROGRAM FOR THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF SAME TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Housing Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C (the "Act"), the City of Eden Prairie (the "City") is authorized to adopt a housing plan and carry out programs for the financing of multifamily housing which is affordable to persons of low and moderate income; and WHEREAS, the Act requires adoption of the housing plan after a public hearing held thereon after publication of notice in a newspaper of general ;f circulation in the City at least thirty days in advance of the hearing;and WHEREAS, the City held a public hearing on the Cityrs Housing Plan (the "Plan')after at least thirty (30) day published notice on February 2, I982, and by the passage of Resolution No. 82-27(the"Plan Resolution")adopted the Plan; and WHEREAS, in accordance with its requirements, the Plan provides for programs for the issuance of bonds to finance multifamily housing development which are affordable to persons and families of low and moderate income and are consistent with the goals,conditions and requirements of the Plan;and WHEREAS, the Act requires adoption of a program after a public hearing held thereon after publication of notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least fifteen days in advance of the hearing, and WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie (the"City") has on this date conducted a public hearing on a housing bond program (the"Program"),after publication of notice as required by the Act; and WHEREAS, the Program provides for the issuance of up to$2,750,000 of the City's multifamily housing revenue bonds to finance the acquisition of land and construction of an approximately 70-unit rental housing development to be located Northeast of the intersection of Mitchell Road and Valley View Road, to the East of the Edenvale Apartments, in the City and owned and operated by Eden Investments Partnership(the"Developer"); and WHEREAS, the Act further requires submission of the Program to the Minnesota!lousing Finance Agency(the"MHFA")for its approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie: 1, That the Program for the issuance of up to$2,750,000 of the City's multifamily housing revenue bonds is hereby in all respects adopted. i i i 2. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to submit the Program to the MHFA, and to do all other things and take all other actions as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the Program in accordance with the Act and any other applicable laws and regulations. t 3. The Developer has agreed to pay directly or through the City any and j all costs incurred by the City in connection with the project whether or not the project is approved by the MHFA; whether or not the project is carried to completion;and whether or not the bonds or operative Instruments are executed. 4. The adoption of this resolution dons not constitute a guarantee or a firm commitment that the City will issue the bond as requested by the Developer. The City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and accordingly not issue the bond should the City at any time prior to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest of the City not to issue the bond or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction. 5. All commitments of the City expressed herein are subject to the condition that within twelve months of the date of adoption of this Resolution the City and the Developer shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the loan agreement, the bonds and of the other instruments and proceedings relating to the bonds and their issuance and sale. If the events set forth herein do not take place within the time set forth above, or any extension thereof, and the bonds are not sold within such time, this Resolution shall expire and be of no further effect. 1 ADOPTED: , 1984 ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk -Z- 8Z 7 1984 PROGRAM FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,Chapter 462C(the"Act"),the City of Eden Prairie (the "City") has been authorized to develop and administer programs of multifamily housing developments under the circumstances and within the limitations set forth in the Act.Minnesota Statutes,Section 462C.07 provides that ing developments may be financed by revenue such programs for multifamily hous bonds issued by the City. The City has received a proposal from Eden Investments Partnership, a Minnesota general partnership (referred to as the "Developer") that, pursuant to the authority found in the Act, the City approve a program providing for the construction of approximately seventy(70)units of rental housing("Housing Units") located Northeast of the intersection of Mitchell Road and Valley View Road,to the East of the Edenvale Apartments,in the City (the"Project").The construction of the Project is to be funded through the issuance of up to$2,750,000 in revenue bonds issued by the City (the "Bonds"). It is proposed that the Bonds be sold privately to an institutional investor. Following construction of the Project, the Developer, or a related entity, will own and operate the Project as a multifamily residential rental project. The Project will contain seventeen (17) one-bedroom apartments and fifty-three(53)two-bedroom apartments, of which twenty percent (20%)of the units will be specifically reserved for tenants whose incomes are not greater than eighty percent (80%)of the area median income.It is estimated that rents for the Housing Units will be$535-$610 per month. 1 PJ�oGp i July 17, 1984 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 84-186 VACATION OF SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT WITHIN LOTS 1 and 2, BLOCK 1, LE PARC WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has a certain easement for sanitary sewer described as follows: A 30.00 foot utility easement for sanitary sewer purposes over, under and across Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 Le Parc, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of recrod in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying 15.00 feet on either side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot 1, Block 1; thence on an assumed bearing of South 88 degrees 05 minutes 03 seconds West along the North line of-said Lot 1, Block 1 a distance of 8.70 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 12 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds West a distance of 228.23 feet; thence South 21 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds West a distance of 295.20 feet; thence South 37 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds West a distance of 186.00 feet and there terminating. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 17, 1984, after due notice was published and posted as required by law: WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said easement is not necessary and has no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 1. Said sanitary sewer easement as above described is hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of the proceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 17, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penze , Mayor ATTEST: SEAL. John U. f'rane, Clerk July 17, 1984 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 84-187 VACATION OF VALLEY VIEW ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM a THE WEST LINE OF VALLEY PLACE TO APPROXIMATELY 300' WESTERLY 41 WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has a right-of-way for Valley View Road described as follows: All that part of Valley View Road which lies southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of Valley Place according to the recorded plat thereof; thence on an assumed bearing of North 2 degrees 33 minutes 24 seconds West along the west line of said Valley Place a distance of 356.10 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 50 degrees 01 minutes 56 seconds West, a distance of 22.77 feet; thence southwesterly, a distance of 228.05 feet along a tangential curve to the right, having a radius of 853.00 feet and a central angle of 15 degrees 19 minutes 04 seconds; thence South 65 degrees 21 minutes 00 seconds West, tangent to last described curve, a distance of 43.00 feet; thence southwesterly, a distance of 100 feet along a tangential curve to the left, having a radius of 568.00 feet and there terminating. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 17, 1984, after due notice was published and posted as required by law: WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said right-of-way is not necessary and has no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: I. Said right-of-way as above described is hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of the proceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 17, 1984. ATTEST: Wolfgang—IT. Penzel, Mayor 5Tln U. franc, Clerk SEAL /00 JULY 17,1984 .9 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 1224.6t, 14720 INTERCONTINENTAL PCKG CO WINE 975.3i: 14721 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 2712.6b 14722 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 4960.6(` 14723 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR WINE 2837.7:; 14724 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 1275.3'., 14725 QUALITY WINE CO WINE 919.6.�, 14726 TWIN CITY WINE CO WINE 2233.00 14727 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO WINE 190.81.� 14728 PAUSTIS & SONS CO WINE 250.9> 14729 LITIN PAPER CO EXPENSE-ICE CREAM SOCIAL-COMMUNITY SERVICE 15.00 14730 DANA GIBBS PACKET DELIVERIES 52.00 14731 CHARLES BAILY REFUND-SUMMER PROGRAMS 28.OG 14732 HARDLY HERD BAND CONCERT 250.09 i 14733 FIRST JOHN PHILIP SOUSA BAND CONCERT-JULY 11TH 2O0.0': 14734 JACK NORDIN MAGICIAN FOR ICE CREAM SOCIAL 125.O: 14735 KRISTINA HULLING REFUND-PUPPETRY CLASSES 14.0.! 14736 SHELLY SCHMOLL REFUND-PUPPETRY CLASSES 28.OZ 14737 LISA COMPTON REFUND-VARIETY PACK 5.00 14738 KELLY MORTON REFUND-SUMMER PROGRAMS 5•OD 14739 LOUIS SHAW REFUND-DAY CAMP 32.ou 14740 SHANNON ROBF.NDLD REFUND-CREATIVE DRAMATIC CLASSES 9.010 14741 JEFF KAPSNER REFUND-TRACK & FIELD 10.0E 14742 TANYA STEPHENS REFUND-PUPPETRY CLASSES 14.0;; '43 BRIDGEMANS ICE CREAM FOR ICE CREAM SOCIAL-C/S 100.00 44 MENARDS REDWOOD STAIN-PARK MAINTENANCE 11.9:' 14745 NANCY BERRYMAN REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 6.0G 14746 ALLISON CLARK REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 9.0( 14F47 KARYL CHASE REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 6.00 1 748 EDEN PRAIRIE LIONS REFUND-ENTRY FEE 8•5C +; 14749 CLINTON GILLEY REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 9.0t' ; 14750 CAROL HALMRAST REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 10.6E 14751 BARBARA OSMONDSON REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 16.U(' 14752 STEVE NIXON REFUND-ENTRY FEE 6 14753 AMY STOFFERAHN REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 12.0: 'I 14754 G'WEN TREAT REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 31.V' 14755 RALPH KRATOCHVIL INSTRUCTOR-EXERCISE CLASSES/FEES PAID 80.0. 14756 AMERICAN RED CROSS MATERIALS FOR CPR CLASSES 100.0 14757 BEAVER MDUNTAIN WATER SLIDE EXPENSES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 143.7. 14758 GEORGANN CRATTY REFUND-TENNIS CLASSES 20.0• 14759 NORTHCO LTD JULY RENT 3415.11 14760 SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTER INC JULY RENT-LIQUOR STORE 3794.5. 14761 QUALITY WINE CO WINE 961.i': 14762 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 1742.F,. 14763 TWIN CITY WINE CO WINE 220.E 14764 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR 2B87.9.- 14765 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 13'.1 42 14766 MARK VII SALES WINE 423.7 14767 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE 544.,, 768 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 4516.9, 1N769 KEN J01iNSON PRINTING-COI1',UNITY CENTER 101.2, 14770 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 7/6/84 19273.7 _ 14771 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 7/5/84 9739.4• 14772 OEPARIME:NT OF IMPLOYLE RELATIONS PAYRDLL 7/6/84 12885. 14773 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO PAYROLL 7/6/84 114.U: 8067323 f �( 14774 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 7/6/84 35.Ot '75 GREAT WEST LIFE INSURANCE CO PAYROLL 7/6/84 4116.0,- IL i6 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS PAYROLL 7/6/84 110.T) 14777 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING DUES 651.0" 14778 P E R A PAYROLL 7/6/84 16723.4'. 14779 MINNESOTA CLE CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 125.0 14780 JEFF EPP REFUND-RACQUETBALL CLASSES 17.00 14781 JEFF PRITC14ARD REFUND-TENNIS CLASSES 2.50 14782 KRISTY KENYON REFUND-SUMMER PROGRAM 149 . 14783 FIRST ST BANK OF SPRING LAKE PK SERVICE-EDENVALE BLVD 14784 G & L CONTRACTING INC SERVICE-RYMARLAND CAMP 3RD ADDITION 4861.5" 14785 MINNKOTA EXCAVATING INC SERVICE-CARDINAL CREEK 3RD ADDITION 1748.0O 14786 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 89576.3'' 14797 NDRTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO SERVICE-LAVONNE INDUSTRIAL PARK 6419.10 14788 SHAFER CONTRACTING INC SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 282452.13 14789 SHAFER CONTRACTING CO INC SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 62616.6° 1419D A & H WELDING & MFG CO STEEL-PARK MAINTENANCE & FIRE DEPT 21.GC, 14791 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 833.9 r 14792 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 14793 ACCUEASE SYSTEM 230.Oc 144.OU S INC FORMS-COMMUNITY SERVICE 14794 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 130.6 14795 ALL STEEL PRODUCTS CO INC STEEL-PARK MAINTENANCE 8• - j 14796 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO MOPS/DUSTERS-LIQUOR 8 STORE 15. -- 14797 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC DUES-PLANNING DEPT 14798 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 119 14799 AMERICAN TEST CENTER TESTS ON AERIAL TOWER-FIRE DEPT 36.0,')5.Oc: 'OD EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC STREET SIGNS a,sOl ARA TRANSPORTATION BUS SERVICE-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 125.0c 14802 ARMOR SECURITY INC KEYS-PARK DEPT KTOP 11225.6,,. 14803 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC BUMPER/GAUGE-STREET DEPT 28.2, 141}04 ASTLEFORD INTNL INC 150.E W05 AVR INC CONCRETE-STREET DEPT 43.OG 14806 BLOOMINGTON LOCKSMITH CD DUPLICATE KEYS-POLICE DEPT 67 5': 14807 LOIS BOETTCHER MINUTES-PARK & REC COMMISSION MEETING 39•E; 14808 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC CYLINDERS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 2467.2c 14809 BRAUN ENG TESTING INC -SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD DRIVE/DELL ROAD/ EDENVALE BLVD/PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 28 2 14810 8REDEMUS HARDWARE CO 6 SPINDLES-PARK MAINTENANCE 15.0 14811 ED BRION SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 10178.0:. 14812 BROOKDALE FORD INC ANIMAL VAN 2217 9: 14813 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC ROCK 437.6C 14814 BUTCHS BAR SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 14815 CARLSON PLUMBING TEST RAINWATER LEADERS-COMMUNITY CENTER 250.0,' 14816 CHANHASSEN BUMPER TO BUMPER -AIR FILTER/BRAKE PARTS/FAN BELT/SPARK 1259.4 -PLUGS/FITTINGS/OIL FILTERS/GASKET/STARTER -THERMOSTAT/C}rOKE PULL/SWITCH/EXHAUST/TIRE TUBE S/CAR BURATOR KIT/PLUG WIRES 113.4� 14817 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO AD-FLYING CLOUD DRIVE 14818 CHEMLAWN LAWN FERTILIZATION-P/S BLDG/WATER/FIRE DPT 821.F. 14819 CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SER INC BRAKE LINING/RIVET/BRAKE SHOES-EQUIP MAINT 12410.4: 14820 CLUTCH & U-JOINT BURNSVILLE INC BEARING/FLYWHEEL-EQUIP MAINT 340 5, 2 ;21 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 420.3"n 14822. BRUCE W DANCE CENTER EASEMENT-COUNTYCISE ROAD ONECLASSES/FEES BIKETRAILPAID 250.0" 14IIL3• GRUCE W COMPTON 50661651 15�� 14824 COPY EQUIPMENT INC VELLUM/BLACKLINE/PENS-ENG & PLANNING DEPT 286.1f 14825 COUNTRY CLUB MARKET INC SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 103.84 1 6 CPT CORP COMPUTER-P/S BUILDING 3647.00 L7 CUTLER MAGNER CO QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 1830.&� 1482.E DALCO CLEANING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 293.8:: 14829 EUGENE DIETZ JUNE EXPENSES 171.2b 14830 DITCH WITHC OF MN INC CHAIN/CHAIN LINK-EQUIPMENT MAINT 51.43 14831 DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE-SDLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 653.97 14832 DONS SOD SERVICE SOD-PARK MAINTENANCE/STREET DEPT 2334.55 14833 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU SUPPLIES FOR.CONCESSION STAND-C/C & R L PK 244.10 14834 STEVEN C DURHAM MILEAGE 12.50 14835 DUSTCOATING INC OIL ROADS-STREET DEPT 1425.00 14836 EAU CLAIRE COUNTY WITHHOLDING FROM EMPLOYEE PER COURT ORDER 9.00 90 14837 EDEN PRAIRIE TRASHTRONICS JUNE TRASH PICKUP 2 .0� 19 1483E ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC HEAOGEAR-WATER DEPT 19.65 14839 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 8 STORAGE CASES/SYRINGE-FIRE DEPT 264.90 14840 EMERGENCY SERVICE SYSTEMS INC PARTS & EQUIPMENT FOR NEW SQUAD CARS 1177.C" 14841 FEED RITE CONTROLS INC CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT 1820.0U 14842 FORE WAY EXPRESS FREIGHT CHARGES-WATER DEPT 385.5`F 14843 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC TAPE REFILL-FORESTRY DEPT 45.4P ELS-4IATER/PARK MAINT/L/S 93.4 14844 G & K SERVICES JACKETS/TOW 14845 G L CONTRACTING INC SERVICE-GRADE ROAD INTO PUMP HOUSE-WATER 2092.1 14846 GARDNER HARDWARE CO KEYS-COMMUNITY CENTER & ROUND LAKE PARK 55.6.' 14847 GENERAL COM!•IUNICATIONS INC RADIO PARTS & REPAIRS 148.65 14848 B F GOODRICH TIRE CENTER 6 TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 203. 14849 DALE GREEN CO SOD-STREET & WATER DEPT 161.5C JAR50 HARMON GLASS REPAIR WINDSHIELD-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 20.Or' 51 JIM HATCH SALES CO INC 4 LUTE RAKES-STREET DEPT 157.2C 14852 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER OXYGEN/LATH-PARK MAINTENANCE 85.0: 14853 HOBCO INC SERVICE-RESTORATION OF CUMMINS-GRILL HOUSE 2505.G. 14B54 HOFF PLUMBING INC ALARM IN HOLDING TANK-SENIOR CENTER 400.O+' 14655 HONEYWELL INC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-WATER DEPT 3214.0� 14856 HOPKINS PARTS CO U-JOINT/DISC PADS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 46.9 14857 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 272 CITY HALL CLEANING SUPPLIES 609.6, ` 14858 INGRAM EXCAVATING BLACK DIRT-STARING LAKE PARK 1551.0.' 14859 JP1 OFFICE PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-WATER & POLICE DEPT 27.6' 14B60 JAK OFFICE PRODUCTS CO TECHNICAL CLOCK-POLICE DEPT 36.C, 4229•'' 14861 F F JEDLICKI INC SERVICE-EDENVALE BLVD 14862 BARBARA JOHNSON EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER 56.7` EXPENSES .71 14863 JEAN JOHNSON EXPENSES 26.E 14864 CARL JULLIE 240.G 14865 REBECCA KRAGH SAILING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 1226 14866 KARULF HARDWARE INC -BULBS/GLOVES/SCREWDRIVER/PLASTIC/BAGS/ -BATTERIES/ELECTRIC WIRE/PAINT/BRUSHES/ -FITTINGS/CAR MATS/HOOKS/CHAIN/VARNISH/ -ENAMEL PAINT/SCREWS/SMOKE DETECTORS/TAPE/ -OIL CAN/SANDPAPER/CONCRETE/TROWEL/SNAPS/ -BOLTS & NUTS/MAILBOX/SHOVELS/ROPE/BROOM/ -CALCULATDR/SPONGE/CHALK BOARD/KEYS/DRILL BITS/MARKERS/ICE SCRAPER/HOSE 92.o, 14867 KOHLER MIX SPECIALTIES CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-ROUND LAKE PARK 34•. �"56B KOKESH ATHLETIC SUPPLIES INC LETTERING ON SHIRTS-FORESTRY DEPT 369 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER -SCREWS/MALLET/GREASE GUN/GREASE/PAINT 969.6.; -ROPE/4 TAPE fIEASURES/FERTILIZER/WEED EATER/DEHUMIDIFIER/DRILL BITS 3336107 { 14870 LAKE STATE EQUIPMENT CO REPAIR HYDRAULIC PUMP-EQUIPMENT MAINT 85.50 i 71 LANCE SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 51.25 1 ' LANDCO EQUIPMENT INC SEAL KIT-FORESTRY DEPT 55.30 14 73 LANDCO/HANSEN TRAILER SERVICE & E WIPERS/O RINGS/SEALS-FORESTRY DEPT 100.0 14674 LAUKKA & ASSOC REFUND-FIRE HYDRANT DEPOSIT 1487 LAUK BROS INC DUSTMOPS/RUG SERVICE-CITY HALL/P/S BLDG 439.7" 20B.51 14876 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR DECALS/BLADES/EDGE 3BO.16 14877 MACQUEEN EQUIPME14T INC SERVICE-BEARINGS-STREET DEPT 248.49 1487E MACDONALD & MACK PARTNERSHIP SW CIMMINGINt HOUSES STRUCTOR/FEESPAID 65.00 14879 BARBARA MATTSON ENVELOPES-CITY HALL 512.24 14880 MERIT/JULIAN GRAPHICS ENVELOPES-CITY DEPT BB-00 14881 METRO PRINTING INC MILEAGE 17.25 14882 KAREN MICHAEL 457.85 CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 14883 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO BLACKTOP 2982.97 14884 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP INSTRUCTOR-$WIMi+1ING CLASSES/FEES PAID 65.OU 148B5 CHRIS MILLER RENTAL-WATERGER 65. 0 14886 MINNESOTA COMPIUNICATIONS CORP WATER SAFETY BOOKS/EQUIPMENT RENTAL-C/C 16.00 148B7 MPLS AREA CHAPTER 66.80 148BB MPLS STAR & TRIBUNE CO EMPLOYMENT AD DEPT-FORESTRY DEPTNOZZLE- 6.60 148B9 MINNESOTA FIRE INC SERVICE 153.06 . 14890 MINNESOTA GAS CO 27.30 14891 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC ADS-LIQUOR STORES 2b . 14892 MINNESOTA TORO INC PIN/SCREW/BRACKET-PARK MAINTENANCE b9626 .00 14893 MINNESOTA TREE INC TREES-P/S BUILDING 76.94 e 14894 MODERN TIRE CO 2 TIRES/WHEEL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 15.9'.� 14895 EARL MORE SUPPLIES-ICE CREAM SOCIAL 145.00 q6 MUNICILITE CO STROBE LIGHT FOR NEW TRUCK 7756.94 Y 77 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 246.96 14898 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 2616.IS 14899 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 25 00 14900 OPUS CORP REFUND-PLANS & SPEC DEPOSIT 340.0 14901 JDHN R PALMER B S E T INSTALL NEW RADIOS IN FIRE TRUCKS 110.25 14902 MARK PANNKUK JUNE MILEAGE 60.00 1 14903 PARK AUTO UPHOLSTERY REPAIR CAR SEAT-P/S DEPT POP FOR CONCESSION STAND-ROUND LAKE PARK 322.0(' 14904 PEPSI/7-UP IIOTTLING CO 14905 T A PERRY ASSOCIATES INC REPAIR HEAT PUMP-P/S BUILDING I51.1( 14906 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC REPAIR ICE RINK LIGHTS-CDt1P1UNITY CENTER 185.2`. 14907 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING-PLANNING DEPT 55.0; I4907 PRAIRI MOF CO INC RACQUETBALL TROPHIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 2 D(1 14909 REEDS SALES & SERVICE CASHSPRINREGISTERARIBBONSCLIQUDR STORE 62.5(' 14910 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS OF MN C 19.Ov g 14911 DAVID RICHARDSON MILEAGE 22232.9,; 14912 RI EKE-CARROLL-HULLER ASSOC INC -SERVICE-HOi•ifIJARD HILLS RD/ARBON GLEN/ ;s -CARDINAL CREEK 3RD ADDITION/RYf1ARLAND -CAMP/LAVONNE IND PARK/FLYING CLOUD DRIVE/ -PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE/VALLEY VIEW ROAD & WEST 74TH STREET STARTER-FIRE DEPT 90.40 t 14913 ROC,ERS SERVICE CO STAMPS-LIQUOR STORE 29.00 y 14914 RYANS RUBBER STAMPS SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 4578.01. 14915 STS CONSULTANTS LTD PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT-PARK MAINTENANCE 786.!�. 14916, ST CROIX RECREATION CO LUMBER-PARKS DEPT 2129.00 ( 17 ST REGIS CORP 2504.57 ,wJI8 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES INC PORTABLE RESTROOMS-PARKS DEPT 4 5090972 1��1 t 14919 SAY ELECTRIC INCORP REPAIR FIRE ALARM SYSTEM-P/W BUILDING 38.00 14920 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO -FENCING-CANINE UNIT/FL00R JACK/SHIRTS- 887.14 FORESTRY DEPT 1(.1 SHAKOPEE FORD INC -PUMP/ALTERNATOR/MUD FLAPS/BODY REPAIR ON 1005.65 SQUAD CARS 14922 SHOW QUALITY PET PRODUCTS INC SUPPLIES-CANINE UNIT 25.35 14923 BEN SKINNER MILEAGE 117.50 14924 W GORDON SMITH CO -SWITCH/FLOOR-DRI/BULBS/HEADLIGHTS/SEAL/ 6693.4r. -FROST PLUG/SPARK PLUG/V-BELT/CHDKE PULLOFF/DIESEL $6475.10 14925 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH, INC LEGAL ADS/ADS-LIQUOR STORE 1773.94 14926 EMMETT STARK SERVICE-COMMUNITY BAND DIRECTOR 435.00 14927 DON STREICHER GUNS SHOTGUN SLINGS/GUN LOCKS-POLICE DEPT 213.91 14928 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET MUD FLAPS FOR NEW VEHICLE-POLICE DEPT 45.56 14929 TARGET STORES PLAYGROUND PROGRAM SUPPLIES 32.60 14930 TAYLORS MANUFACTURING 6 BUDDY BUMPERS-POLICE DEPT 800.62 14931 TENNESSEE CHEMICAL CO CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT 4540.47 14932 TRACY OIL CO INC UNLEADED GAS 8480.0" 14933 TRI-STATE TREE SERVICE INC FERTILIZE CRAB TREES-ROUND LAKE PARK 65.DO 14934 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS SUPPLIES-SUMMER PROGRAMS 3059 14935 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT 7.80 14936 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED RED EMERGENCY LIGHTS & SIRENS/UNIFORMS 5769.70 14937 VAUGHNS INC FLAG REPAIR-P/W BUILDING 1493E VESSCO INC PARTS FOR CHLORINATOR #1-WATER DEPT 433.58 s 14939 CRAIG VICK SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 75.00 14940 VIDEO CONCEPTS #472 VIDEO TAPE-POLICE DEPT 690.00 14941 VIDEOTRONIX INC CLOSED CIRCUIT T V SYSTEM-P/S BUILDING 11198.00 12 VIKING LABORATORIES INC SODA ASH & BICARBONATE OF SODA-C/C 212.50 „43 WATER PRODUCTS CO -FOUR 1" METER/CURB BOXES/GASKETS/COVER/ 17891.81 CLAMPS/252 5/8 INCH METERS & COPPERHORNS 14944 WATERITE INC SENSOR-COMMUNITY CENTER 68.00 14945 SANDRA F WERTS JUNE & JULY MILEAGE 35.13 1446 WESTERN CHEMICAL CO CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT 2310.12 14947 WESTERN IRRIGATION INC PIPE/COUPL•ING-PARK MAINTENANCE 44.10 1494E WHOLESALE LIGHTING INC LIGHT BULBS-WATER DEPT 121.80 14949 XEROX CORP SERVICE 291.00 14950 ZACKS INC TIRE CHAINS 795.00 14951 ZEP MANUFACTURING CO CHEMICALS-STREET DEPT 179.40 14952 ZIEGLER INC EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-WATER DEPT 10.00 14953 MENARDS REDWOOD STAIN_PARK MAINTENANCE 11.9", 14954 EVAN CHANG REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 2.0+3 14955 SCOTT CONGDON REFUND-SWIMMI CLASSES 14.0'J ` 14956 DAN CORDT REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 11.00 14957 KEVIN DELIE REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 12.00 14958 TARA DELIE REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 13.00 14959 JULIE HOLDEN REFUND-SKATING CLASSES 13.00 14960 MELLISA JANSSON REFUND-SKATING CLASSES 13.0 14961 KATY JOHNSON REFUND-SKATING CLASSES 14. V 14962 ERICA METER REFUND-SW NIMMING CLASSES 13. 14963 JENNIFER MICHAELS REFUND-SKATING CLASSES 1400 14964 RIMY NOVAN REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 00 4965 JOANN SCt{AtIDT REFUND-SWIM . MING CLASSES 30.00 )6 KATHIE TCOSKOM REFUND-RACQUETBALL CLASSES 26.00 4967 JUSTINE VAN BEENEN REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES � r 6554228 14968 TROY WELKEN REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 12.00 14969 ARMOR SECURITY INC REMOVE BROKEN KEY FROM LOCK-PARK DEPT 46.10 14970 DARYL ASHELYS TREE SERVICE TREE REMOVAL-FORESTRY DEPT 295.00 14 BEST & FLANAGAN LEGAL SERVICE-EDENVALE BLVD/MITCHELL RD• 600.00 14 c BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC & MFG CO BELTS-COMMUNITY CENTER 18.24 70 14973 CUSTOM SURFACING SERVICE-STARING LAKE PARK TRAIL 11018.32 14974 JOY EASTMAN EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER 2.64 14975 TOM EASTMAN EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER 2,G4 14976 EGAN-MCKAY ELECTRICAL CONT INC SERVICE-SHADY OAK-FLYING CLOUD DRIVE 1894B.60 14977 JACK HACKING EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 37.98 14978 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM AUGUST B4 SEWER SERVICE 58910.77 14979 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP SERVICE 36.25 14980 M-V GAS CO SERVICE 132.00 14981 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 733.70 149B2 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING CO POP FOR CONCESSION STAND-COMMUNITY CENTER 306.25 14983 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC REPAIR DISCO LIGHTS-COMMUNITY CENTER 200.25 14984 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER 99•80 14985 SUN NEWSPAPERS ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER 48.75 14986 TITLE INSURANCE CO REFUND-CITY WEST BIKETRAIL PAID TWICE 2047.50 14987 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE INC GAS CYLINDERS-COMMUNITY CENTER 232.8D 14988 VIKING LABORATORIES INC CHLORINE-COMMUNITY CENTER 111.00 14989 XEROX CORP SERVICE 221.29 14990 K MART 3031 TENNIS BALLS-SUMMER PROGRAMS 23.88 14632 VOID OUT CHECK 69.00- 9404082 $831166.63 ri lJ�iO -