Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 05/15/1984 EVEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA • TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1984 8:00 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, WEST WING GYMNASIUM COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Paul Redpath and George Tangen CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie; Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson; City Attorney Richard Rosow; Finance Director John Frane; Planning Director Chris Enger; Director of Community Services Robert Lambert; Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael INVOCATION: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel PLEDGE OF Ai.LEGIANCE ROLL CAlI. I. APPROVAL. Or AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS . MINUTES OF THE CIIY000NCiL MEETjNG HELD TUESDAY, APRIL 17, 1984 Page 950 iII. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Resolution authorizing submission of ronosed Community Development Page 962 Rlia Grant Activities for Year X (esolution No. 84-115T B. 2nd Reading, of Ordinance No. 23 84, Bryant Lake Surface Water Use Page 964 Ordinance C. WILSON RIDGE. 2nd Reading of Ordinance Na. 24-84, Zoning District Page 966 Change from Cc,+aarcial Regional to Office. for 18.64 acres, and from Commercial Regional to I-2 Park, with variances, for 5.42 acres for Wilson Ridge, Approval of Developer's Agreement for Wilson Ridge, and Adoption of Resolution No. 84-82, Approving Summary of Ordinance No. 24-84, and Ordering Publication of said Summary for Wilson Ridge. Location: 60.85 acres for three lots and four outlets, i; North of Valley View Riad and East of Highway #169. D. NORSF.MAN 6TH ADDITION. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 26-84, Zoning Page 952 District Ch,nge from Rural to 1-2 Park, for Norseman 6th Addition by f Herliiev ilelne, Approval of Developer's Agreement for Norseman 6th 4 Addition, and Adoption of Resolution No. 84-84, Approving Summary of Ordinance No. 26-84 and Drdorinu the Publication of said Sunmary of Norseman 6th Addition. Location. 11.88 acres into two lots and one nutlot, 'West of Washington Avenue, south of Valley View Road. L. O'NfIiL OFFICE BUILDING. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 29-84, Zoning Page 950 District Ch ng : from Ducal to Office, with variances, and Adoption of Resolution No. 84-103, Approving Develot'mont Plan subject to conditions. Location: 1.70 acres at Northeast quadrant of City West Parkway and County Road #61. City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,May 15, 1984 F. fLViNG CLOUD BUSINESS CENTER. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 36-83, Page 994 Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 Park, Adoption of Resolution No. 84-109, Approving Development. Plan Subject to conditions, and authorization for sale of excess right-of-way. Location: 2.91 acres, . Southeast corner of flying Cloud Drive and McKinley Lane. G. Receive petition for improvements to Eden Road between Glen Lane and Page 997 TH 169 and authori/e flip j,cec,dratinn of a feasibility repprt (including a rev low of the feasibility of constructing Singletree Lane between Eden Red and Prairie Center Drive I.C. ,2-011 -(Resolution No. 84-110) H. Receive petition for Utility and Street: Improvements for 74th Street, Page 1003 Golden triangle Drive and Valley View Road and authorize preparation of a feasibility report, I.C. 52-065 (Resolution No. 84-116T I. Appr_ove_plans and specifications for Carmel and Vicinity Improvements, Page 1005 I.C. 52-059A and 51-0598 (Resolution No. 84-11T) J. Final Plat approval for Eden Glen 4th Addition (Resolution No. 84-111) Page 1006 K. Final Plat approval of Welsh Addition (Resolution No. 84-112) Page 1009 L. final Plat approval for Eden Bluffs (Resolution No. 84-113) Page 1012 M. Final Plat approval for Mark Charles Second Addition (Resolution No. Page 1015 84-7 Tom- ---- - N. Final Plat approval for City West 3rd Addition (Resolution No. 84-119) Page 1018 0. Proclamation promoting Small Business in Eden Prairie Page 1021 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Feasibility Report, Utility and Street Improvements for Bryant Lake Page 1023 Office Tech Center, l.C. 52-05i3IResolution No. 84-91) Continued from 4/17/84 ---B. SOUTHWEST CROSSING PHASE II by Vantage Companies. Request for Page 1024 Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Industrial, Planned ' Unit Development Concept Amendment, and Planned Unit Development District Review for 36.89 acres; Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 lark (with variances) for 11.3 acres; and Preliminary Plat for one lot on 11.3 acres. Location: West of Washington Avenue, i north of 1-494. (Resolution No. 84-104, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; Resolution No. 84-105, Planned Unit Development Concept t Amendment; Ordinance No. 36-84, Zoning; Resolution No. 84-106, Preliminary Plat) , C. EDEN PRAIRIE TECHNOIOGV PARK by Hoyt Construction. Request for Page 1044 inning District Change from Rural to 1-2 Park for 12.0 acres, and Preliminary plat of 18.2 acres into one industrial lot, one outlot, ( and road right-of-way. Location: W. 76th Street, west of Washington Avenue. (Ordinance No. 37-84, Zoning; Resolution No. 84-107, Preliminary Plat) I , • City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,May 15, 1984 D. BROCK RESIDWF INN by Eden Prairie hotel Company. Request for Zoning Page 1056 '; District and Site Plan Amendment for 4.33 acres for 128-unit hotel and Registered Lend Survey for two i;arcels (4.33 and 4.67 acres). Location: Southeast quadrant: of Highway 115 and 1-494. (Ordinance No. 38-84, Zoning; Resolution No. 84-108, Registered Land Survey) • E. City Code Amendment to Section 11.70 to regulate signs at Flying. Cloud Page 1075 n i�)brt F. Requesk Tor Municipal Industrial Developments Bonds for McGlynn Page 1095 Bakeries in the amount of 1,650,GOO.O0 (Resolution No. 84-120j V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 13508 - 13790 Page 1107 • VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS VII. APPOINTMENTS A. Appointment of 4 Representatives to T.H. 212 Citizens Advisory Committee VIII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Letter from Vera P. Keller, Vice President of Operations, Factory Outlet Page 934 Center, re2rding request to amend Deveioper's Agreement regarding (113\ sign restrictions (continued from May 1, 1984) 8. Re Pest for Parade Permit for Eden Prairie Jaycee Women Page 1114 C. Leagre of Women Voters_(Minnetonka, Eden Prairie, Hopkins) position Page 111E on Community Programming via Cable TV IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members B. Report of City Manager 1. Evaluation Review Form (continued from May 1984) 2. Authorization to purchase City radios 3. Comments on Landfill Expansion EIS • C. Report of City Attorney D. Report of Director of Commune y Services 1. Eden Prairie Horsemen's Request (continued from May 1, 1984) Page 1117 t; 2. Purgatory Creel: Recreation Area Draft Master Plan (continued from Page 1120 May 1, 1984) .-------•----- ----- E. Report of Finance Director 1. Clerk's Iic:ense List Page 1122 X. NEW tHiSiNESS • Xi. ADJOURNMENT. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL I7, I984 7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Paul Redpath and George Tangen CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City Attorney Roo; Pauly, Finance Director John D. Franc, Plannin Director Chris Enger, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz and Recording Secretary Karen Michael INVOCATION: Councilman George Bentley PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Councilmen Richard Anderson and George Tangen were absent. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS DF BUSINESS MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Agenda and Other Items of Business as published. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 1984 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Minutes of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 27, 1984, as published. Motion carried unanimously. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Draft Master Plan (continued from March 27, 1984) - continued to May 15, I984. B. Final Plat approvalfor The Preserve Commercial Park 3rd Addition (Resolution No. 84-89) C. Approve_plans and specifications for signals at F ling Cloud Drive and Shady_Oak Road, I.C. 52-057 (Resolution No. 84-93 D. Clerk's License List E. Approval.of funds for YMCA/Storefront Youth Action Counselor - (delete item 2 as outlined in Apri1-12, 1984, memorandum from Jan Flynn, Human Services Coordinator) 1 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Consent Calendar as amended: item A, is to he continued to the May I5, 1984, meeting of the City Council and item D. is approved with the deletion of paragraph 2. referred to in the April I2, I984, memorandum from Jan Flynn, Human Services Coordinator. Motion carried unanimously. QC:CI City Council Minutes -2- April 17, 1984 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS • A. T.H. 212 ALIGNMENT OPTIONS City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been sent to property owners affected by both TH 212 alignment options. He said Staff had been working with traffic engineering consultants, BRW, Inc., and Mn/DO1 officials over the past several months in an attempt to more definitively determine the access expected should the TH 5/Residential alignment be chosen. Jullie said large and small scale drawings showing in some detail the schematic layout and access potential of each alternate, together with a listing of advantages and disadvantages for each alternate had been prepared. • Jullie reviewed the background noting that improvement of TH 2I2 over • various alignments has been under consideration since the early 1950's; discord as to its location slowed progess in the implementation of the necessary planning and improvement. As a result of meetings initiated by the Twin Cities Metropolitan Council and the Highway P212 Association back in 1967, agreement was reached as to a general alignment corridor by all of the connunities in eastern Carver County and Eden Prairie and Hennepin County. In 1970, a study by the firm of Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff, funded by the Minnesota Highway Department, resulted in the selection of a corridor for the location of TH 2I2 (Unique System "D") which was supported by all affected units of government as well as many private organizations. In I974, two draft Environmental Impact Statements were circulated for comment for TH 212 and also TH 41. Since circulation of the EIS's, little progress was made in resolving the comments in those two statements. Because of comments received on the EIS's and the new environmental regulations, Mn/DOT decided that the EIS's should be rewritten and Mn/DOT should combine the two projects into one. In early 1979, Mn/DOT formed a Citizens Advisory Committee as part of its scoping process and also held many meetings with concerned citizen groups and agencies. A final recommendation of the Mn/DOT Scoping Report was limited to future analysis of alignments through Eden Prairie to the "TH 5 - Residential" and "Unique System 'D'" alternatives. Jullie said that after completion of the Scoping Report, a new group called the Southwest Corridor Transpor- tation Coalition was formed to help focus attention on the urgent needs for upgrading TH 5 and the earliest possible construction of new TH 212. Also in 1982, the "Schreiber Bill" was passed which provided a measure of funding for acquisition of right-of-way within proposed highway corridors which are under development. The "Schreiber Bill" monies can only be used s: for vacant property under the threat of development and only if the highway route is designated on the City's official map. Mn/DOT has programmed improvements on TH 5 for letting in 1986, Jullie indicated, which will include: widening of TH 5 to four lanes from Prairie { Center Drive to County Road 4, with intersection improvements at Mitchell Road and County Road 4. Also possibly to be included is a new bridge at ): the railroad crossing east of Wallace Road; the design is dependent upon the chosen location for new TH 2I2. An overlay of existing TH 5 west of County Road 4 west to TH 41 is also programmed for letting in 1986. jl 967 City Council Minutes -3- April 17, 1984 Jullie stated that funding for these improvements is already programmed i and is not tied to the proposed transfer of the excise tax on vehicles from the State's General Fund to the Highway Construction Fund. Also Mn/U0T officials have assured the City that these improvements will pro- ceed regardless of location or timing for new TH 212 with the possible exception of the railroad bridge which could be delayed if there has been no decision on the new TH 212 alignment. Regarding TH 212: "Stage I" is in Mn/DOT's work program for letting in June 1988, construction to include a full freeway design along TH 5 from 1-494 to Wallace Road and including an interchange at Prairie Center Drive. A two-lane road would proceed westerly from Wallace Road to TH 41 in Carver County. The estimated cost is $18,0110,000.00. Being in the "work program" allows staff the authority to work on these projects. The proposed excise tax transfer to the Hinhway Fund will provide the necessary funding for this project. Also scheduled for letting in 1988 is the addi- tion of two-lanes on TH 5 from County Road 4 to TH 41; this is dependent upon the excise tax transfer. Mn/DOT is now in the process of resuming the EIS preparation for new TH 212 and is hiring a consultant to help with this. It appears very likely that, given the present outlook for funding, the proposed letting date of 1988 will be pushed out into the future. For planning purposes, we should anticipate that actual construc- tion of new TH 212 is at least five to ten years away. Jullie introduced Bill Crawford, District Director, Mn/DOT District V; Gary Erickson, traffic engineering consultant, BRW; and Steve Alderson, Metropolitan Council. Gary Erickson reviewed each of the two alternatives: "Unique System 'D'' and "TH 5 - Residential" using maps; advantages and disadvantages of each alternative were presented. Jullie noted the City Council will not make the final determination. The final decision will be made by Mn/DOT and/or the Metropolitan Council. The Council's recommendation will be forwarded to these bodies. The purpose of tonight's hearing on this matter is for input by the residents and business people. Redpath asked what would happen to a resident of School Addition who wanted to sell his home in the next six months and the decision had been made to go with the "TH 5- Residential" alignment -- would this person be able to sell to the State under the right-of-way acquisition provisions? Jullie said there is no money available right now. He stated the State does not expend money until the EIS is completed, If there were a situation such as this, the City and Mn/DOT would he willing.to discuss funding alternatives with the seller. Crawford indicated Mn/DOT has done protective buying throughout the State but usually that is not done until after the EIS is completed. City Council Minutes -4- April 17, 1984 Bentley asked City Attorney Pauly what the City's liability is in this situation -- if there is no State money available for right-of- way acquisition. Pauly said because it is not a City project the City would have no liability. Redpath said if the "TH 5 - Residential" corridor were chosen, no one would particularly want to own property in that area. Jullie said there are some assumptions: that the EIS indicates this to be an acceptable route, that the excise tax transfer is adopted, and that funding is available -- this would mean that the process of acquiring right-of-way might begin in two years. Construction, however, might be a number of years down the road but at least residents would know what was to happen. Residents would receive their full market value. Penzel asked Crawford what the likely schedule might be for this, given a worst case scenario. Crawford said that. given pending legis- lation, it appears that 25% of the funds would be transferred effective July 1, 1984. TH 5 and 212 carry a high priority with both the Commissioner of Transportation and the Governor. Crawford indicated that Mn/DOT might be in a position to acquire right-of-way as early as 1986 -- after the EIS. He noted that he has requested to have a consultant hired to help with an EIS -- this takes about 20 weeks (to get a consultant "on board.") He indicated that his recommendation is to proceed with the project development process and hope that, when the time comes, the plans are on the shelf and ready to go. Penzel said that while the presentations this evening might have seemed brief, the City has been intimately involved for a number of years with the process of selecting a route. He said the Council is well aware of the pros and cons as the consultant has advised and as well as the members see them personally. He stated the Council is very interested in hearing from the people who will be directly involved. Jon Otterlei, 4704 Merilane, Edina, asked how old the base map was. Erickson said it was 5 - 10 years old -- and that buildings shown in yellow are new buildings which had been added. Penzel said for all practical purposes all residential buildings are shown. Otterlei 5 asked what the objection was to having a full access at Wallace Road. Erickson stated that the ability to have full access at both Wallace and Mitchell Roads is limited due to safety reasons. Penzel noted that Wallace Road businessmen were asked to connect to Technology Drive some time ago in anticipation of access problems relating to Tli 212/5. Linus Westrup, 7918 School Road, asked when the Council expected to come up with its recommendation. Penzel said hopefully that will be done this evening. Brenda Hart, 7810 Eden Court, asked if they would he stuck between two highways should "Unique System '0"' be chosen. Penzel noted the differences .n. in the two alignments and what the impact would be on the Hart property regarding improvements to TN 5. • aii3 City Council Minutes -5- April 17, 1984 Tom McDonough, 14633 Martin Drive (owner of building at this address), stated what an investor looks at prior to purchasing a building regarding access and ruutes. Art Rohe, 7826 Eden Court, asked what would happen to TH 5 should the "TH 5 - Residential" alignment be adopted -- would the improvements which • are to be made he wasted? Crawford said that TH 5 has to he upgraded and it is anticipated the alignment will be determined prior to the upgrading of TH 5 and therefore TH 5 would be designed with TH 212 in mind if the residential route is the choice of the City. James Johnson, 9305 Talus Circle, said he was interested in Otterlei's property on Wallace Road which might be used as a multiple dwelling site (on School Lake). He asked where access would be to this parcel. Erickson said it appears for the most part that the parcel would be taken. A portion of School Lake would have to be filled in so the roadway could be built across it. Walter Carpenter, 13000 Plaza Drive, asked if Mn/DOT owns the right-of- way where TH 5 "bows" west of Plaza Drive and wondered if the "bow" effect will continue. Erickson said the "bow" will remain because of the impact removal would have on Purgatory Creek. Crawford concurred; he said the State does still own the property in question. Bob Sharpe, 7904 Eden Court, asked the difference in the impact on the tax base of the two alignments -- residential vs. industrial -- and how that might affect the Council's thinking. Penzel said that used to be a consideration but since the passage of the "Fiscal Disparities" legis- lation it has less of an impact on the decision making process -- there are now more important considerations to be made by the Council than the effect on the tax base. Bentley and Redpath concurred. Jullie said the area south of MTS where Technology Drive has been constructed has a great potential for corporate headquarter's sites which would add greatly to ; the tax base. He said this would substantially add to the tax base compared to the loss of the residential taxes in School Addition. • Dennis Dirlam, 14785 Martin Drive, asked what the impact of the Highway 5 improvements would be on the warehouse buildings north of TH 5 and west of Mitchell Road. Erickson said the impact would be negligible to the north of TH 5 because of the space available on the south side of the highway. . Judy Miller, 7835 Eden Court, asked what effect would a recommendation }I, to approve the "TH 5 - Residential" alignment have on getting a loan A on a house in School Addition. Penzel said he thought that would be difficult to answer. Crawford said he has never heard of a case where mortgage money was turned down. Penzel reviewed the procedure which is ) used in acquiring property relative to the estimates made. Jullie said 1 assurances to a lender that Mn/DOT has paid a fair market price in the ;4. past for properties acquired should not preclude granting of a loan on the property. 95(1 City Council Minutes -6- April 17, 1984 Ronald Ott, 7830 Eden Court, said he felt the widening of TN 5 would have a severe impact on the School Addition residents and would not have any problem with the City recommending the "TH 5 - Residential" alignment which would "take" the School Addition homes. Don Goetzman, SGL Properties, asked if the costs of extending Technology Drive to Wallace Road would paid by Mn/DOT. Penzel said that is a local improvement and would be assessed against the benefitted property owners. David Priebe, CPT, expressed concern about the number of parking spaces which CPT would have to replace with a ramp as well as concern about the loss of ponds on its property should "Unique System 'D'" be chosen. He also wondered if we might be overbuilding highways. Penzel said that was a departure from CPT's original concern which was that TN 212 and 5 should have been constructed a number of years ago. (A letter from CPT regarding Trunk Highway f212 is attached to these minutes.) Erick- son noted that the Highway Department has entered into a contract to have the traffic forecast for this corridor updated -- this is done on a regular basis. This means that prior to the building of TH 212 current information will be available and will he used as the basis for plans for that roadway. Bentley asked Priebe if CPT was opposed to the construction of the road- way along the "Unique System 'D'" corridor. He said that was correct. George Butzow, MTS, 14000 Technology Drive, and a member of the committee which studied the alignments, said he would look to the feelings of the residents of the community. He said he would prefer the "TN 5 - Residen- tial" alternative for purely selfish reasons. He noted that the quality of life as well as the value of the industrial area is improving all the time and from what he has heard this evening that can not be said for the residential area. Jan Hyde, 7814 Eden Court, said she and her husband are retired. She indicated they are very happy with their home and wondered if they would still be able to live in Eden Prairie where they have access to doctors and shopping should they be forced to move out of their home. Penzel . said there would be a fair and equitable settlement made to each of the property owners in the area. He also indicated that the residents will then be able to determine where they would like to live. George Roles, 7953 Eden Court, said he had heard 15 years ago that the Highway Department had purchased land behind MTS for TH 212. Crawford said he was unaware of such a purchase. Roles asked what the racetrack will do to traffic on TH 2I2 and/or 5; will we be building another high- way like this in 15 years. Penzel said there is every indication that this will be a reasonable project and will serve us for some time. He said the racetrack will have more of an impact on TH 169 and CSAH 18. :r City Council Minutes -7- April 17, 1984 • Mrs. Hart asked if sound barriers would be constructed along Highway 5. Crawford said sound abatement is required by federal law wherever there is new construction in residential areas. Penzel asked if this would pertain to upgrading of TH 5 since this could be considered as reconstruc- • tion and not new construction. Crawford said it was his opinion that it would he new construction and sound abatement would be provided. He said Mn/DOT has relocation counselors who are most helpful and if anyone has questions they would like to ask they should feel free to contact • them and request additional materials. Crawford stated what some of • the benefits allocated presently are. • Mrs. William Parkos, 7800 School Road, asked why the residential homes would have to go and not the industrial buildings. She also asked why factories were allowed across from homes. Penzel said those decisions • were made before any of the present Councilmen were on the Council and before the City had a comprehensive plan. Bob Hanson, 4772 Sycamore Trail, expressed concern for his parents who • live in the School Addition. He asked what the possibility was of moving all of the homes to another 40 acre tract in the City. Penzel said that was probably not feasible since there are comparably prices homes avail- able on the open market in Eden Prairie. Hanson wondered what the termin- ation date would be when people would have to be out of their homes. Penzel said if acquisition were made and nothing was to he done for three years, • provisions might be negotiated for the residents to remain in their homes. He said Mn/DOT has to make that decision. Glen 8ritney, 7823 Eden Court, asked what the recommendation of the committee which was formed three or four years ago was. Jullie said the committee proposed that the EIS should focus on two alternatives: • "Unique System 'D"' and "Highway 5". He noted there was not a ground swell of opposition from the residents. Linus Westrup said he would not like to be wedged between two freeways. He said property values will go down. He asked if residents might be • asked which of the proposals was preferable. A show of hands indicated . • a large majority of the residents to be in favor of the "TH 5 - Residen- tial" alignment. i Steven Shea, 7941 Eden Court, said his property value, based on the recent valuation notice he had received, has dropped from 1983 to 1984. Norman Nelson, 8009 School Road, asked what effect and impact "TH 5 - Residential" corridor would have on the Central Middle School. Penzel said this would actually create a better use of property for the school -- the school garage would be moved and so would the ball fields, but the school itself would not be affected. Nelson called attention to •t?• the condition of Valley View Road and noted this would probably need some work so it could he used while TH 5 is upgraded. Mr. Clifford, 7823 Eden Court, asked if provisions are made for adjust- ments in the mortgage rate when residents have to move. Crawford said he will be happy to send out information as to what present policy is; he indicated that the law takes mortgage rate adjustments into consider- ation. 9110, City Council Minutes -8- April 17, 1984 Tom Miller, 7835 Eden Court, asked how one would get onto Highway 5 at Wallace Road. Erickson used a map to explain this. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to recommend the "TH 5 - Residential" corridor to Mn/DOT for its consideration as the most feasible alternative. Motion carried unanimously. B. FEASIBILITY REPORT, UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR CARMEL ADDITION AND VICINITY, I.C. 52-059A (Resolution No. 84-90T City Manager Jul lie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published and notices had been sent to all property owners fisted on the Preliminary Assessments Roll for this project. Director of Public Works Dietz referred to the Feasibility Report dated March 1984. He reviewed the feasibility study and outlined, on maps, the proposed routing for trunk sewer and water though this area. (For a detailed report see the Unapproved Expanded Minutes of this portion of the Meeting of April 17, 1984 which are attached.) Dean Holasek, 6475 Rowland Road, asked why the developer can't pay for more of the project cost. Dietz said the special assessment policy is rather specific in State Statutes. If the City receives a request for improvements and the project is found to be feasible, the costs may be assessed. Holasek said the landowners in the area area already affected by the increased traffic on Rowland Road due to the County Park. Dietz said the Park Reserve is looking at putting an overlay on the road in 1986. Hakon Torjesen, 6605 Rowland Road, said he felt the road system proposed by the developer had not taken into account the surrounding properties. He specifically referred to the roadway due west of the proposed access into the Carmel Addition. Planning Director Enger said Staff had been directed by the Council to look to the surrounding properties and what the impact of the proposed streets would be on those properties. He said Staff had met with a majority of the neighbors -- it was determined they would be best served by hiring a planner who would come up with an overall plan for the area which would protect their best interests. Don Brauer was hired by some of the neighbors. A general plan was reviewed by the Council following meetings with the neighbors and their planner. Bentley recalled that Enger and the Planning Department Staff did a study at his request. This was then presented to the Council. Roads were placed where they were due to the soil conditions and terrain. Bentley indicated he had never made a decision on platting or zoning based on whom is going to pay for the assessments and would not do so in this instance if he were going to vote on the matter. He said each project was voted on based on the merits of that particular project and the necessity for the improve- ment. Redpath said that as far as who pays for a trunk sewer is concerned, the City has some classic cases where people have been assessed beyond their limits (e.g. Bran property on Valley View Road.) City Council Minutes -9- April 17, 1984 Mrs. Wayne Kinion, 6401 Shady Oak Road, said she had never been contacted prior to notification of this Public Hearing. She said she did not think it fair to have such a "heavy Agenda" because some people (her husband, Ur. Farber, Dr. Olness/Mrs. Torjesen) had to leave due to the lateness of the hour (10:20 p.m.) Mrs. Kinion said she felt the Carmel Addition is a detriment to their property; they had moved into the area for the wildlife and the serenity. She said the sewer and water will not serve their property -- and will be a detriment as they have no plans to develop their property. She said they do not want these improvements and do not wish to pay for them. Marlene Larson, 6505 Rowland Road, said she has had her home for sale and has been unable to sell it. She said it is her road which had been men- tioned by Torjesen as that which is due west of the Carmel Road. There was discussion as to whether or not her road is a City street and what the City's policy is in that regard. Larson went on to ask who owned the Carmel property at the time the improvements were requested -- were those who signed the petition the actual owners of record. Penzel indi- cated that Hans Hagen may now be the owner but since the petition had been signed in February the owners had more than likely been others who had signed the petition. City Attorney Pauly reviewed the ways in which improvements can be initiated. Penzel suggested this matter be deferred to determine the legitimacy of the petition. He noted the question before the Council this evening was whether or not the project is feasible; not how the project is going to be assessed. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to continue this Public Hearing to the May 1, 1984, meeting of the City Council which is scheduled for 7:30 p.m. in the Boardroom of the School Administration Building. Motion carried unanimously. C. FEASIBILITY REPORT, UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR BRYANT LAKE . OFi=ICE TECVi E[UFR, I.C. 52-053 Resolution No. 84:91F City Manager Jullie indicated that Gerald Schoenfelder had contacted the City and said he objects to the proposed improvements but expected to sell his property very soon. Schoenfelder and Dennis Doyle, Welsh Construction, agreed that a continuance of this Public Hearing to May 15th would allow time to work out a potential solution. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to continue this Public Hearing to Tuesday, May 15, 1984, at 8:00 p.m. in the School Administra- tion Building, Motion carried unanimously. • City Council Minutes -10- April 17, 1984 D. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 7 (Resolution No. 84-94) �. City Manager Jullie said notice of this Public Hearing had been published. He said it is anticipated this will be the last T.I.F. District necessary for support of the Major Center Area highway improvement projects. City Attorney Pauly noted the evidence introduced and described in the minutes of September I5, 1981, is made a part of the record in these proceedings. Also made a part of the record in these proceed- ings are: a) the notice of the April 17, 1984 public hearing; b) minutes of meetings of the City Council held on September 22, 1981, March 30, 1932, November 16, 1982, March 15, 1983, May 17, 1983 and August 16, 1983; c) letter from Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce dated September 18, 1981; d) minutes of meetings of the City's Planning Commission on March 29, 1982 and May 9, 1983; e) memorandum dated April 17, 1964 by Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works, addressed to the Mayor and City Council; f) letter dated April 9, 1984 addressed to Mr. John Lobbeu, Chairman of the Board, Eden Prairie School District Mo. 272; g) letter dated April 9, 1984 addressed to Mr. Kenneth Daniels, Chairman of the Board Joint Independent School District No. 287; h) a letter dated April 4, 1984 addressed to Mr. John Derus, Chairman of the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners; and i) a memorandum dated April 17, 1984 by Carl J. Jullie, City Manager. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to close the Public Hearing and to adopt Resolution No. 84-94, providing for establishment of proposed Tax Increment District No. 7 and the adoption of a Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto. Motion carried unanimously. V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 13045 - 13308 MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Penzel, to approve the Payment of Claims Nos. 13045 - 13308. Roll call vote: Bentley, Redpath and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS City Manager Jullie reported that the Development Commission had received the City Council's charge and will now attempt to work on establishing priorities. A meeting has been set with the Economic Development Committee of the Chamber of Commerce; legislators have also been invited to attend this meeting. VII. PETITIONS, REQi1FST5 & COMMUNICATIONS • A. Parade Permit Request from Eden Prairie Lion's Club City Manager Jullie noted the Public Safety Department had reviewed this request and recommended approval as per Lt. Clark's memo of April 11, 1984. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Lion's Club request for a Parade Permit for Saturday, June 2, 1984, Motion carried unanimously. (Vt)i City Council Minutes -11- April 17, 1984 VIII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. Final approval of Municipal Industrial DevelgpeentBonds in the amount of_$1,750,000.00 for BBS Partners Project (Resolution No. 84-76) City Manager Jullie noted Finance Director Frane's memo of April 12, 1984, and City Attorney Rosow's memo of April 10, 1984. Steven Hoyt, Hoyt Development, indicated their bond counsel had said this would not have an affect on the city's per capita allotment which is included in pending Federal legislation. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Penzel, to adopt Resolution No. 84-76, granting final approval of Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $1,750,000.00 for BBS Partners Project with the proviso as outlined in City Attorney Rosow's memorandum of April 10, 1984. Motion carried unanimously. B. Minnegasco Franchise Ordinance No. 35-84 City Manager Jullie stated the proposed Franchise Ordinance had been reviewed by the City Attorney's Office; it seems that all of the other 1 34 cities within the Suburban Rate Authority have agreed to the Ordinance as drafted, including the 5% limit on franchise fees. Jim Anderson, Minnegasco representative, was present to answer questions. J MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 35-84. Motion carried unanimously. IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Evaluation Review Form The consensus was to continue consideration of this item to the May 1, 1984, meeting of the City Council at which time Council members should have written comments ready regarding the forms which have been distributed to date. B. Report of City Manager 1. City Manager Jullie introduced Craig Dawson, Assistant to the City Manager. 2. City Manager Jullie said there will be an article in on Eden Prairie in an upcoming issue of "Plants, Sites & Parks" (an international publication.) This particular issue will feature the State of Minnesota. Jullie said this magazine has a circulation of 38,000 and said a 1/6th page ad would cost $685. 4 4100 City Council Minutes -12- April 17, 1984 Bentley said he thought it would be a good idea for the City to place an ad in this publication and he suggested the City put together a promotional plan. • MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to purchase a 1/6th page ad in "Plants, Sites R Parks." Roll call vote: Bentley, Redpath and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 3. City Manager Jullie indicated the Planning Department is very busy and has contracted to have Howard Dahlgren and Associates do a couple of Staff Reports. • 4. It was noted that the May 15, 1984, meeting of the City Council • falls on the day of a School Board election and consequently the Council Meeting cannot, by law, begin until 8:00 p.m. 5. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to move the regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council from July 3 to July 10, 1984, at 7:30 p.m. due to the Fourth of July holiday. Motion carried unanimously. C. Report of the City Attorney There was no report. D. Report of Director of Public Works 1. Retpnal Mutual Aid (Resolution No. 84-92) Director of Public Works Dietz referred to his memorandum of April 11, 1984, in which he addressed the Regional Mutual Aid Association. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No. 84-92, authorizing joint and cooperative agreement for use of personnel and equipment - Regional Mutual Aid Association. Motion carried unanimously. { X, NEW BUSINESS MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by 8entley, to instruct Staff to write a letter to Governor Perpich in support of the appointment of Alice Rainville as Chairman of the Metropolitan Council. Motion carried unanimously. XI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adjourn the meeting at 11:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. 1364 • • MEMO TO: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Steve Durham, Assistant Planner DATE: May 10, 1984 SUBJECT: Resolution No. 84-115 In accordance with the Urban Hennepin County Citizen Participation Plan, the Planning Area 2 Citizen Advisory Committee (PACAC) reviewed the City's proposed Year X COBB Program on April 17, 1984. The committee has recommended funding to be approved for the H.O.M.E. Program, Removal of Diseased Trees and Housing Rehabilitation. The committee also recommended that the funds for assisting an elderly housing development be designated as "continency" within Eden Prairie. This designation allows the City up to six months to evaluate a specific plan for assisting the development of elderly housing. A meeting, regarding a proposed elderly housing project, was held May 9, 1984 between Dick Crier of Derrick Land Companies, Mark Hendrickson of Hennepin County, John Frane, Chris Enger and myself. Preliminary review of the financing plan allows for the use of COBB funds in the proposed elderly housing project. However, Mr. Hendrickson suggests putting the funds into contingency until a more detailed financial plan is proposed. • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN RESOLUTION NO. 84-115 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION AND APPROVAL OF PROPOSED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE TO HENNEPIN COUNTY YEAR X URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has executed a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County establishing participation in Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City has developed a proposal for the use of Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds made available to it; and WHEREAS, the proposed use of Community Development Block Grant funds by the City has been developed consistent with the Urban Hennepin County Statement of Objectives and the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended; and WHEREAS, the proposed use of Community Development BIock Grant funds by the City has been developed in cooperation with local citizens and the appropriate Urban Hennepin County Planning Area Citizen Advisory Committee; fl NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Eden Prairie approves the proposed program for use of Year X Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds by the City and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hnein ieraion nnin County Co�mmunityrDevelopmentnty for sBlocktGr for Statement of Objectives n the Year X Urban e Objectives and Projects Use of Funds. PROPOSED ACTIVITIES AND BUDGETS ACTIVITY BUDGET H.O.M.E. $:3, UO.00 Removal of Diseased Trees $ 5,000.00 Housing Rehabilitation $14,000.00 • Contigency $47,638.00 ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, on this 15th day of May, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Franc, City Clerk L: I MEMORANDUM ) TO: Mayor and City Council 1MRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: May 10, 19S4 SUBJECT: Bryant Lake Water Surface Management Ordinance i) L'ar.lier this year the City Council gave a first reading to the Bryant Lake Water Surface Management Ordinance, and directed staff to send a copy of the ordinance s to the Conedssioner of Department. of Natural Resources for his review and approval. I The staff of the DNR have reviewed this ordinance and recommended approval with 2 i minor changes to the ordinance. The first change is under Section 9.62, Subdivision 1 - should read, "ltis unlawful for any person to operate any boat, vessel or water- craft. on Bryant Lake in excess of 15 miles per hour from Noon until 6 p.m. on Sundays from Memorial Day Weekend through Labor Day." This insures that the Sunday of MemorialII weekend is covered under the ordinance. The second change is to provide an exemption clause for resource management personnel, enforcement personnel, and emergency personnel when acting in their official capacity. The Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources will have approved this ordinance with these changes prior to May 15, 1954. Upon the approval of the second reading with these changes, staff will send a copy of the ordinance to all residents in the Bryant Lake area that have access to the lake, and a copy to the Hennepin County Park Reserve District requesting that they post the speed limit rules at:. their pnhlic access. BL:and • ( • 6,L/ . __•:.___. . 2.1: I • . or4)1ri\N E 1P3. 23'84 t 1 AN oI:D31•1'::ri.of '11iI: MTV OP l:OI:i•1 PPAIIeTS, MIN:1 `I`A, TMTINDIN 1 CITY CODE CHAPTER 9 BY Pi::u:;' 1;(; 1'1a-7;Ie I' SA 1.1cy 9.62 I:S 9.63; I`..") Iri ki?JUN11::IZ1N'v PIES1::,11' si>TION 9.63 AS 9.64; Ail) DY NUJNe, sl1::r101 9.62 DEL\'1'J 'JO Ii:).;UL\'I'l0N Oc"111E USE 01•' 1311ThN'1 1iit1:; At4D RIY.)Vf1NG BY 1{El'EI;i2;.CE CITY (IX)I CJIAI.'117,12 1 AND 91 uION 9.99 h2l11:11, /0.`2•:3 O'i711at 'illIN S, CON'r am 1:mt,TY PEOvIL;;::::i. 'ME CITY CC.;.;CI1, 01' l3)t 4 MIME, silt:\L U171, ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Chapter 9 shall be and is amended by renumbering present Section 9.62 as 9.63, and by renun>!>.tring present Section 9.63 as 9.G4. Section 2. City Code Chapter 9 shall be and is amended by adding thereto • Section 9.62 ti hictc reads as follows: SIC. 9.62. Rr1GUTAT:I:ON OF USE OP BRYAN1' LAKE. • Sub_l. 1. It is unlawful for any person to operate any boat, vessel or watercraft on Bryant Lake in excess of 15 miles per hour frau noon until 6 p.m. on Sundays from Manorial Day t-hr w;;h labar Day Noelzend. • Suixl. 2. IL- is unlawful for any person to tow one or sore persons or to be to\secl behind a w:at:orcraft on water skis, aquaplane, surfboard, saucer, i.nner.t:utx-., or similar device on Bryent Lake, unless tN.o competent persons are I. on the watercraft. The driver of such watercraft crust watch whore the water- craft is being driven at all times.• The second person on board the watercraft • • shall be an observer, and shall watch the person or persons being toned at all i tires. *ere this provision conflicts with Section 9.60, Sahi. 3.N., this provision .,hall. control. Section 3. City axle Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Ik:.fini- tions Applic:Lblc to the Tnlirc City Carle including Penalty for Violation" and Scx•tion 9.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their. entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. d Section 4. 'this Ordinance shall become effective fran and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the _ of_ day , 1984, and finally read and adapted and ordered Published at a regular nt-eti)t crff4the City Council of saidCity on the day of , • MIST: City Clerk 1fayor 1`111r:.1`."1la> in the Fi?:A) Prairie News on the day of , 1.994. a/C • Wilson Ridge • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 24-84-3-PUD-OFFICE-I-2 PARK AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Oevelopment 3-84 Oistrict (hereinafter "PUD 3-84-Office-I-2 Park"), which includes Office and I-2 Park Zoning Districts. Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of , 1984, entered into between Wilson Ridge Joint Venture and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement") and that certain Owners' Supplement to Oeveloper's Agreement dated as of , 1984. The Developer's Agreement and .avers' Supplement contain the terms and conditions of PUD 3-84-Office-I-2 Park, and ..re hereby made a part hereof. • Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD 3-84-Office-I-2 Park is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide Plan of the City. ' • j B. PUD 3-84-Office-I-2 Park is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City. Code, which are contained in PUD 3-84-Office-I-2 Park, are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD 3-84-Office-I-2 Park is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is, removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 3-84-Office-I-2 Park District, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, 7 subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and 9 i i Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their ( tirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of . 3 • • • • 9 • 9 l 04'I • : , 1 . j P.U.D. DISTRICT ZONING CHANGE TO OFFICE . r. Those parts of the Northwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County described .„ as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the North line of the South • hal: of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 and the easterly rigHt of way line of U. S. Highway Nos. 169 and 212; thence on an assumed bearing of South 8 degrees 43 minutes 27 seconds West alo,.g the easterly right•of way line of said U. S. Highway Nos. 169 and 212 a distance of 502.27 feet; thence South 81 degrees 16 minutes 33 seconds East a distance of 10.00 feet to the actual M poi,it of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 79 deg::ees 23 minutes 32 seconds East a distance of 525.97 feet; thence southwesterly and southerly a distance of 275.11 feet along a ,iontangentiai curve concave to the Southeast having a central ang .e of 48 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds and a radius of 325.00 fee , the chord of said curve bears South 35 degrees 15 minutes 00 sec•>nds West; thence South it degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, tan;ent to the last described curve, a distance of 547.03 feet; the ice southeasterly a distance of 248.09 feet along a tangential . curie concave to the Northeast having a central angle of 47 degrees, 21 minutes 51 seconds and a radius of 300.11 feet; thence South 7'8 degrees 30, minutes 00 seconds West to the easterly right of way line of said U.S. Highway Nos. 169 and 212; thence . northerly along said easterly right of way line to the point of beginning. • 0 .y. e )• l l b (1 0 t' N '1r,•r1 t 1 ')(1 0. 1 C•• o.,,1.N •O'� L (.In n n 0✓(�N O O L •'n N 0'f.bl •.•w•1 i t w0••4 •Nn 0C1•n7 p0 .•� O Y rv,4 s:U 1,0 0• n•••b 0 0 1 .Y I: 1 l U 0 1 1♦ • n W 7 NO p � rNr• • N7 v'1n n L•:1 N ;bb H7 C,-.,.,I n r.,.N:1!• yOyp• •.n .l NO •rt5Y1w:1 )n a .,• lnN ••(,0 0:. .1r IR?)t•T(.01•0 J A IY 1..A n n(-'HI`b n {✓W r)A r.07 N.11 • I :.nb'1 0:1 1r'n•(1 U07AN11 fi A:1 7t•M ...r•L p h•.•• 1.• I NO if r•.1 n •M; bN an 1'• ANft h O I.I.J.1)01 ' 77.1 PN 7 1 0 •.n 1.10 10 10.0 0 ' rot 0 r.7:T N o rI,n 0y N I b..•r1 41J IR 11 N 0.fl M 0 Y n 4 rlt1 et Aln O n O A 1.V•(•b M N H •• n Al 0 1,•J A b ( Y r:1 N C. t1 W N N(t N✓:I:Y N O 11 J o �f T 1••N bA Ott O ✓q p•.(t tiQL„1••O b MP✓0LOOb N, N ',111:-O:y et OV O ' INA •N 0•OaM+t• n7n •1 •• rt c A L A•r• p b J N I.0•O •IT (r :1 A • f 1 1•a•0 •)A • 0• r 1.0,Y(11:1 0Inn n<n ll 11 n 0 t'fl J O (l A 7) I,.�OA �1 !fin NGn OnbOn 000' O 0079 IN ry H1rn1; 11 R:7 ' 0fl 4111 • (•^ N tL •.00 7•1•• C)!1 • 0 In 1♦vv .I •1 A Cl, 'L7Y10 iD1N (•TI^•IS�•nN A1•A 7AC1•U r• bCr. N; y O D7• YO a t n v1^L 1•..wM IL:IO O C A p n7Mfl Vttn 'JWIt• o(f y v'II.t♦•y.(H NC r-.. t LY( r, ° .`1.i•Z•O H L rt O JO• (• !O • .n yi,1 4 7' :f n .1 r♦ (1 n r U n N O I( ((rr f� O Y :f 1v,n1 1 - 4t N {1•11••:t.t A (r 1,7 It♦1 rt. N O m7 Y„••U�N .•N 7 ••U t W:I.10 L AN N t•or Y 0nA el:1 A r 0 % ft Mo✓K 7(1 r• •U N t• 1�✓ • J NA•T)N •<CO✓ • Art••••♦• 7W n 10 00'n if 0 t)-T.•M(1N 7•0 Or.V.n n PM • n„' IL.O N C e M CI (+IL• O 4 1 70 0 M :1 n 4 b n 7(t YY p / O, r4 mr. b •1 n1• N N1•fl.0u ANO fNvn JNb•nr'C•:T rr•tt Mn • O •)1 1n 10 ✓11 n 4n H O 0 ro P:Y tT In ,1 0 O r1 7• r.1:1 •7..• b•' • • rT:'•t 0t w 0 0 i N C.A.Y O n 1• i•.r1 11^r• A N rl n n t 0 V t•.O✓' 11 M1 Olot lv 0tt f, 10t• n p.tan 0tI '••n•1 1,0 00 C)5.8I 8:NN p O n n rCNry 1'•,rt � 77 • 1'•1'14 A••1.,:. nan 0f1. ON7 a Y` ( 7 1 N I I IL I••^•1D la 0 0 n 0 n N A In 11 t,. p h 0 I';1 p 0 O W J n M O T, 1: 0 . t O.1(1 M" 7N A A • N I. :1 r{ a 4 r• 09,0 7 N r o'( 1 I✓♦••i C r•r••''J 0 O O 10 A n O 7 .I'l. o WI 0 I1:ft • p w n0rt•YO N O . (1♦>•G Ot'r. O 10 •Oy 7p1'1 :Y M Or (+A;,•N O �O p 1(0 0 1• bt M uJ 1 A t C C J N r' a. 1 t , ..) If N U K A 1 Oh(1:174 7'm�'n A NW HN7•i•p Q�G'�•U67 :f t O y. ,f T(D On1v 0,0 1t0 0 .In7 N OA 1.i000 N1•. C1C0Lnn UOC1• 0.:f C n n 'O N.7 tlo 5. n7'o L Tn 7. N n r:AM1 Mt..A A ntt.l Ar'0.W11 t „ 0 N f 0 N •W r L :11tO ;1" 7 0 n 0 1•' 01000.00 n. it r1(+jh et SO'I OP7•nwof 1 C A n..1i1L .OA1(')01 Any':N�00 t 'r♦ to NO 0 ', t t K (tn 0In 1O V N J CO t W7 r. ft.:, 0'r1 (7 . ( N:•I%0711 Atilto•ox ✓t'••1 NO0...11 O. •„:f n f:. •AY.tt C.✓A•OA 01: 1100:r 0 10 pn7W• N70 r ,yn•• (b U 11•< O✓ •rr Dnne re n N o n ✓ re N WplI m 01•rX .1 ✓0 IN 1< 0 W n m WNO O MOr1 V • n( 0„rr 3.l •. r A too Y ...O. N W I) '.� 0 Il a • ,,0.n tL 7 A A A 0 K M m ,'Z r, a 4'0 =1 A r 'V r m w w r GO✓0•i A1•o7N0T) N1t++rr77r+y^`J10btTO0) rn•40.7j 3-1 OC•III 00.7* •000 7•.r.1^f.7• OWwOg00 •� •A700•p0 •.0 f.b•7 ' G r•.�077'.O✓�O b O C a7 ,'(( •1 7 i 0 NN 0 •:r7•t(t *A0 •00 b' Y1.1 Yb 7•70•H0 1t O jinonO ¢ 0 !j•,0r•It'P lr(r. .1 y !� (4 1 1 N (I -� A7105O0Wu •,0f1r• •>' r1 01 7`0atl M wO.tlrF A(+ KO✓ 11U Y•q9 Orn01 0«.et 0 r 00 r N . "Aa77V 1�t KrNh NzH A nr• rt ,t Np •pp r 0 ID O UO• JJ K 0 r1 0000(t 70(10 0N)r•0.•0 7r 7Y0 t•O MMW N Y.r•00 -0 •p 0 O•tt 7 0 4•O 0 0 n1 0 tt ri C O •4 C n N✓ ✓ iq•a�C O N b ✓K m r••. •_I . NNn ew 0b 11NM A7AN•• 7a Aan �' • ',Hoar. K ' 'f nnaxL to AA A • WNrN1AN KPO' (1 01 GJ„7CO o...w .J 11• a rt 7•rtn(. p:•.p•• t1 •7•NO P T+•O• W 1. ♦fi t• •7'N> n V•rl:Y O.)✓ a • Sf•K✓1 0•• ••0 0 1..N t NL 7' •Nn O VN.•A ( N 1:7 • (a71�WAtY{^nA to. O A•••C• �� p7 Olr)5V �• Yn WO J7'0 •M• !7* A AI-•b 1�10O•O Y10T70 tl }1 `•11'e1 d•<1• •O 0t.•H 7MOrN W N7M • 7AN hL•f N(It 011. , f0K11 ONNr1 /n1.Nt• O~`N0n07 '1 ♦N00m07 OONW^t O O�.1t;11• A Mn• C bn 7' Mnt^•A ✓ 01 • 7 rt•1•r.01� H>' 4 L st 0 A N 1n O. 'C ;mom 1 t1 L ♦ c y ¢V N • 7 •00 nrtf 0n w YO (R0.O n p✓p7r 19O N7•to bIt LL 7(0 (II0:1 C(T 1or17 0 • 01 r•1aM✓•uQy f,'<I.fl1•• f.n to: '1 G N j.y.1,1 O r.t°-•pro a hurt nw�1Q t11KNQ b r•0r1tt a O�'00 N •nh✓OK 7N7<7n wq0 s',n W O (r• • 7N Nr' n On N O:y0 An�YH O.ruff! 1 A 0 nN bAnt• ' 0,.T N• 1 rr 0 n..1- 1 m.. .0�1 n .,•,„,0 7 d h N•1 A O Nt•fibn7 Vnron ti..DU„ N' 0.h7 M n rt:t b nrp.•0.00✓:F(00 AFD•.) :T•0.1•'• v.�.YN•• 0 0No.G0 004 tt, A 0'!.0 h 11010 h •t M M n n 1-0• h 0. • •J H 11 r• M• W N t/0 0:Y 0 _r1• i'N 0 1 A 1RB 7'000 A• O {n 0 1.00r••o p 00 :1•♦ 7 • ✓..K • QO1G ..An[Yn7 f, rw•NN7r• Vw n i. 11 1•i1 L A 'A O•1 lr A 11 Qr•K) n N n 10 0(.'• 11 A t0✓r1 7 71bft t•hn I'.rT 7rr 7 (1000A b frb,•••A rTl•W0017N:T 007Y •H:1'J 11 r10hNO 10 I.Or•Lw 'Y rt rtn 0•• A ••0,0N . 7 .0 to r•0l:1•m V•774' Oh ✓7 •0 ,....,•1 10'n fll :Y rt♦^ r• P 7 O.0 ilwl7 p'P.n U.. 7. '1 1 r1 O NYC ••,NO r, Nn A t•.TJ'1 7 A •W 7 01o1.•✓A i.T nr-n W Onnb •L ✓.'(( ,i. rT tee 0 7 K 1«.h.•n O N 0 U b N,. n•m •:t 1) rt:M K G 7 n .•M(N a (:rt. n 0'I r• • A rt T.:Y n u :•re 0-tale I^ 077 �ryt••M IN.p'T A N A II �A 0 r( Il '0 1 D NN4 it •7741 N N •1A N 0 11 t b l'<A • n n . r1 to✓ (�.It`t to 11N O0(11,H .,0r UT d h.NCNY h N71 0i(r` 1. • 1' w t• t h o0 1 �1L r•.♦I r1 A r' A s:y.* 7 W 7 7 • 7 n,n O • ' 0 fi N• 1 n } y.; • • 1.1 f JM�t•nr10..r]•LValWmn t*CH( , 4'NOpI*0 f0•. ,.-MMAM7'00XpM0•OMO AGO YNP W s A P O X I..•A•0 0 A f O 1]H 0.V A N I^F. a n n n if. A G N M J.A U•.G co I. I.00W 0{t ]n•C nrt;t W 77••']A G•0 A I.a NH w •OI-•• U ]• JGA ann.art C.•tr1HaY•rttt --ey JOAaAAre,rtnynyH • nnnrt(t - A:T O It U ]V• 4]A]r 0 Y I•••'.f f,X r]0 OI J-V Y Y A J•f,Z t'I :1• ✓ .... O A M• t ASV.i N %JO.•O7 00 n5OtoOO 'f Ai•AO.• C AAHA OOrnOnw H 0..O V A. OYUH A Y•n N 7 O n Y•VI O!••7 r Y•N m X r*o,.N i.h r U w h••I N M u ve N n n 0 0 0•..„0....„... O u•M Y N Y N.•P •rto n-e Gi-AN:.tJ i W ti W W O• a rf tft eO]t C't, A 07'JnXnf N5 J JA tC ti �� YA iUY' .• ViA:1H ' ..W Y•NA H:, N ow N Y;S( Ila 1•Xrr N'J f• G•+ • •• t; N N t ? I XWN O OY•itA rt -O h]^ ]f))ni On n7 n7M1.7 MA X7a000•• f,nn2.41 .•M n M 7 r.PXa7 "r C•Xr-O Jr1 OD D XYp Art Yv0Z(A••7Mtf•n A71n AA 71{ 7 re VItNo•q n O *PM OI.lnn A ton•'•rt NA N p~*t • ni 0M ft(] •.•Yan •• J• t yy pg} p O MO fy)00 A Y O t m NOO tf A nM.47 r-•np.O G A O lZU O YA.e n 0..007 i X •A OD[. -e. NO Y K7 a., J 7H, tiM0.00m*genre r son [t t3'nnaw O • Y Oi• •OW tDQ 7WA •Yf• 0XAMCn Co DYnOY OO MO.fn.lOtt U. 6A NO 'G 77 OO U0rrit'Dr .00 rT1.DOO it1411 nm..c7A.t 7HN ryt' -• INr-•rr0r00 000 n aWOP 7w'1 tH iUOn0A0 UnNnA O n•..i' PCHOrt tjN n N Y 4]••H O(U)••1.N A D n n d r A Ql w t V•- y•+J Aa.. co!]Q7 O7 t• p.00 Q AO MV tt, ..HntlO onn.a•NIt000 MON NYf]�Xp6 WJOYOH nr•Lt NO - N N- ...IC L nYO,rom n` ma ..0 CO H nA G t N 0 • a oO`J,1 n WGo M :Y. It YA n•KAK Y•UtyI' ," U 7Nr :1n7077plrHY I Ure0Ar:•MUowA 7 7AM ]YY••••n rD • •.i O.w • n Itnv .t••7 Nr0 i Y• yn n r NONrt.n •n .•f• •O it P5O tt I W7 N r.•AAGN ••'3 pf+ YM A O YM - O A •0 ♦r0.N r n y N MA• 4w 7 0 •t. YnNll AO On•O T' A tHVA Gi yA.l] Y Nlnaa •••..ovc0n nfr•]'n0 r•Y•UOZO•.s L^L. y •re Y• ,J Altel•G it 1r ONY•Y•cenno• NJt4AY oD O on 7Or•rO UY•O wPO N r (.�•••ww- n0 o COM0Y•K 0NOO A• N Ar••1 N•70.0 n o oo n Ou fHt7M1105 C pM 70 O+ IAnHNN prlri`O(C�A•y•07MMOrt500O,on.onNG�n•Jv.mft n art•n _q Man y L' ]Init H K NC0Qn0 it pM et- OrtODNr7•C C• w0. A L, fni �O71+n NA• 0 rtOet. N g% 6p Jrnp015 yy01 AR0'•ty�t rOfne NWIOY'Dn•'Jin U ,OH•Otf..A pnt 5Orr0K or Ow bbrr I. aaA 6 •.e C rnO O:i Y' '?K C MNnpp709A InY O �OFr nJ'M 7NMYn ntr U HONM.r1110~7r 0 "H Pp nYr:CWat7CAN Anrfn yN71�7 N`tsr.Vf+GOCrHr}fn•.w w N NGpr tYfO.ra OV•A • �'M t40 NHR7N y7•itOx 7 r O O V 7N Q•O Nl1U 0K Y•r!OOM AAA]t•N yr •anOay V OIr]Y110.n gua0nn7,7[/D n n.H•It1OOMrAA•.If 7MN~ CWp 7pma..., N OM•Xr1 ppNAh'rO1yOGrL ,"yW O'i771I0Oj!�..n D0•,Orl 0A 7 • NnrY`O Pron. �i JWP rtrt Y7rp nf1• HnDAoo•mN•1,7CoG7n`f OOOrff•.OWn&C Y NNltl a•�7•••••C:Wa nyV• n N ..MN 7 n0M M rr�t A7nrf7• n H • • rt•y •W S O • K n O Y•O ttrrrr re r•.]•• a y'Y• 7 i Of 0 0 K t 7nY O P t i1�g n w NaCO p A W o O Nnt•t NY X _ ". •OI.T7 Y l.' t..i r0 WI nNM• N (fit H • `IN '0] i.w•7n 00 • 7 0 0 000 O0 A f r,.. I 0 0 W • w • , 0 n H _ • w0 y K rA rq • I_: . Y1=p`•Q�'1 r t*ONA4Orl C IOH qOG .•og sy N lj ran. y OMOYA•�ap7 X N7 0. NMN C4,0 y W A M a M r C O•rio.onp r y r G' 0 0 r r A N M Oapp w &6IS4 .•v 7ov,c' .. nw•w�v'L r - 77[ A r► t•i •IxP,G] N 7 NYW ca y X raves]. •. go R 8. .0 ntt nx !net -. pp 1}P .i 11+.•W a rf r� N M 01•' , plt Yryytf•-r. fi'0• QPW oo�bpiiNY ••*•JM 'J�•Y pR• r1 O O_ r j. .n. ••rn1l • M0,•N` CoB •O{An p foo. •i OO.O r� ••rye► tt 101]I0•1•• 0 �tI0w N Y ONg.E• ••tNn pp r OCWOoo-Orin►O •..rNr nrf V .. O.n•��•rroq IHf :Are JX .qii • sMsn►iO1 N •Fb O1. p 0•7 11 7 y •y7G7n]- w ONpO6 gWaf•H o ] p Nw0 MA 1p Co .n,.J OOrrg"a xJ N •tOr0Mkrf C 1NI0HU y 0: NOIb• •1„ s•u. y(My1j Y •• + WON OOo K 2";:•• • &tf Y a »v yO Da zO0 gN M W N�N(NtN o a Tyr AO. O.Or MA•H 0tt OrrCffN 0 r N N&n N YOJO0•it MNNN i ,:rr`r,A n v 5w • WOOUJee•77tt 0 AO Ann X An00S WnO •M'K:O K ^ O nN►H p7 c• n• Si N J1▪ 5wO•e G ;Jna �A W0-.whO • lrlOn Y Y.. n� P•^Q.rµ Nq tR ry0N 0Nrt ]+ yn•OA G rr•• 700 . Hr{� NG p ; . •• AM G N70• 0070 .0C O •NOM p W•Ati• ••UOn•ON o 1 ,0 • sr,t M• . tar S�& •5"" 3 wnror�i OL 'e y N ].. 1 nOn MO • Q$04 Oa n0 • NO••. pr O"K-!* W� :. - w Oaf jJ •.• A� x N��O My �i • rSFo�i �N Ca.`tlM/a' I it 1. 0 . s c• NA Al •..1.. .yrA .. o o »yry wo. bw ry • ] y MO:! I+ n. • t. r •,". •4pt0 � 1 1•. $ 11 <l: qfg • May 9 1984 SITE 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION That part of the South half of the Northwest Quarter and the North half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying East of the easterly right of way line of U. S. Highway Nos. 169 and 212 described as follo:Js: Commencing at the intersection of the North line of said South hilt of the Northwest Quarter and said easterly right of way line of U. S. Highway Nos. 169 and 212; thence on an assumed taring of South 8 degrees 43 minutes 27 seconds West, along said right of way line, a distance of 1093.00 feet to the [.,int of beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing South 8 degrees 43 minutes 27 seconds West along said right of way line a distance of 59.12 feet; thence southerly a distance of 473.72 feet along a tangential curve concave to the West having a radius of 2009.86 feet and a central angle of 13 degrees 30 minutes 16 seconds; thence outh 7 degrees 33 minutes 29 seconds East, not tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 100.00 feet; thence North ;3 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 539.63 fret; thence northerly a distance of 250.87 feet along a r.ontangential curve concave to the East having a central angle et 46 degrees 08 minutes 39 seconds, the chord of said curve tears North 8 degrees' 48 minutes 05 seconds'West; thence • northerly a distance of 205.34 feet along a reverse curve concave to the West having a radius of 1428.73 feet and a central angle of 8 degrees 14 minutes 04 seconds, the chord of :aid curve bears North 10 degrees 09 minutes 12 seconds East, to a point on a line that bears South 81 degrees 16 minutes 33 seconds East and a distance of 410.42 feet from the point of teginning; thence North 81 degrees 16 minutes 33 seconds West distance •of 410.42 feet to the. point of beginning. containing 5.46 acres. • ( . • Wilson Ridge PUD-3-84-DEVELDPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1984, by and between WILSON RIDGE JOINT VENTURE, a general partnership consisting of Welsh Construction Company, a Minnesota corporation, and Wilson Learning Center, a Delaware corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 60.85 acres, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Industrial for 18.98 acres; Planned Unit 'Development District Review and Zoning District Change from Commercial-Regional to PUD-3-84-Dffice-I-2-Park, including 18.64 acres for Office, with variances, and 5.42 acres for I-2 Park, with variances; and Preliminary Plat of 60.85 acres into two lots and five outlots, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said entire 60.85 acres hereinafter referred to � f as "the property," and; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Resolution #84-66 regarding the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Resolution #84-67 regarding preliminary platting, and Ordinance M24-84-PUD-3-84-Office-I-2 Park, Developer 1 covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: 1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the materials revised and dated February 21, February 28, and March 9, 1984, reviewed and approved by the City Council on April 3, 1984, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. Developer shall not develop, • construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein. 2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. Developer agrees to apply to the City for development of the outlots of the property, as depicted on Exhibit B, in conformance with the following designated land use guidelines and shall not apply for, develop, construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided within said guidelines: A. That Outlot A shall be an Office/Industrial use. B. That Outlet B shall be a use within the Office District. C. That Outlot C shall be an outlot, with a preservation easement over the flood plain area to be given to the City. D. That Outlot D shall be an Office/Industrial use, with a preservation easement dedicated to the City over all flood plain areas, extended to the northern and eastern boundaries, as depicted on Exhibit B. E. That Outlot E shall be an Office use on the south portion of the lot and that a preservation easement over the north portion of the lot to be given to the City, as depicted on Exhibit B. Office/Industrial shall be taken to mean primarily_ office use, with site plan detail to provide for the justification of anything other than office use within the structures on the property. 4. Prior to final plat, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's approval of: • A. Plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer for the property as depicted on Exhibit B. B. Slope stabilization and erosion control plans. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 7 5. Prior to final plat, Developer shall submit to the Director of 1, Community Services, and receive the Director's approval of: A. Scenic easements for all areas identified for preservation and along both sides of Nine Mile Creek, including, but not limited to Outlot C, over all flood plain areas of Outlot D, 91 and a portion of Outlot E, as depicted on Exhibit B. B. A ?0 ft. wide public trail easement above the 850 contour along the north side of the creek to be dedicated to the City. C. Plans for all pedestrian trails as proposed on the plan. Upon approval by the Director of Community Services, Developer shall record such easements, or cause them to be recorded, and shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above, as approved by the Director of Community Services, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 6. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property, Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of: A. Plans for the overall signage for the entire development. B. Detailed landscape plans identifying by location tree size, type, quantity, and method of installation. Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall construct and develop, or cause to be constructed and developed, those improvements required by the Director of Planning in accordance with applicable City Code sections and Exhibit C, attached hereto. • 7. Developer shall notify the City and the Watershed District 48 hours prior to any grading, tree removal, or tree cutting on the property. B. Developer agrees that no graded areas shall be left unrestored for unreasonable period of time during the development process, as determined by the City Engineering Department, and Developer further agrees to confine grading to that area of the property within the construction limits as shown on Exhibit B. Developer shall place snow fencing, and/or other appropriate barrier material as approved by the City Engineer, at the construction limits prior to any grading upon the property. 9. developer agrees that trees removed, damaged or destroyed outside of the construction area by Developer, or caused to be removed, damaged, or destroyed by Developer, measured to be twelve (12) inches in diameter, or greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground level, shall be replaced by similar tree species, diameter inch for diameter inch (i.e. a Red Oak 12 inches in diameter may be replaced by three Red Oaks four inches in diameter). The trees used for replacement shall be no less than three inches in diameter and shall be replaced in locations as approved by the Director of Planning. 10. Developer shall, in the final plat, dedicate the necessary additional right-of-way for Valley View Road, as reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. t i 11. Developer agrees that the exterior lighting shall be installed with cut-off luminars. Parking lot lights shall be less than 25 ft. in height. No lighting of atriums or skylights, such as uplights shall be used, which would emit a glow from the structures. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year aforesaid. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ( Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor Carl J. Jullie, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS. • COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1984, by Wolfgang H. Penzel, the Mayor Carl J. Jullie, the City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public ( 'i i OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT .[ TO a DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN ! WILSON RIDGE JOINT VENTURE AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1984, by and between MEATCUTTERS PENSION FUND, hereinafter referred to as "Owners," and the City of Eden Prairie, hereinafter referred to as "City:" For and in consideration of, and to induce, City to adopt Resolution r'{84-67 for a preliminary plat approval and Ordinance #24-84 changing the zoning of the property owned by Owner from Commercial-Regional to Office and from Commercial- Regional to I-2 Park, as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of , 1984, by and between WILSON RIDGE JOINT VENTURE, and City, Owners agree with the City as follows: 1. If WILSON RIDGE JOINT VENTURE fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner shall.not oppose the rezoning of the property to Rural. 2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owners, their successors, heirs, and assigns of the property. 3. If the Owners transfer such property, owners shall obtain an agreement from the transferree requiring that such transferee agree to the terms of the Developer's Agreement. MEATCUTTERS PENSION FUND -ulw a Utecht, Trustee `_ STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1984, by Eugene Utecht, Trustee, Meatcutters Pension Fund. Notary Public CITY Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor • Carl J. Jullie, City Manager { STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1984, by Wolfgang H. Penzel, the Mayor, and Carl J. Jullie, the City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation, on behalf of: the corporation. Notary Public Wilson Ridge CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-82 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE 34-84-PUD-3-84 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 34-84-PUD-3-84 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of 1984; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN '{{ PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 34-84-PUD-3-B4, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a i. body type no smaller than bredier or eight-point type, as defined in Minn.. Stat. sec. 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 34-84-PUD-3-84 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on , 1964. • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor • ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Wilson Ridge The following is the full text of the City of Eden Prairie Ordinance No. 24-84, which was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on , 1984. Following the text of the Ordinance, the Developer's Agreement, which is incorporated therein by Section 5 of ' the Ordinance; is sumnarized. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 24-84-3-PUD-OFFICE-I-2 PARK AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 3-84 • District (hereinafter "PUD 3-84-Dffice-I-2 Park"), which includes Office and I-2 Park Zoning Districts. Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of , 1984, entered into betty en Wilson Ridge Joint Venture and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement") and that certain Owners' Supplement to Developer's Agreement dated as of , 1984. The Developer's Agreement and Owners' Supplement contain the terms and conditions of PUD 3-84-Office-I-2 Park, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. _ . PUD 3-84-Office-I-2 Park is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD 3-84-Office-I-2 Park is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code, which are contained in PUD 3-84-Office-I-2 Park, are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD 3-84-Office-I-2 Park is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is f feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent 4 unit. (r)9 • Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and f hereby i., removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 3-84-Office-I-2 Park District, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of ATTEST: 3oh-n D. frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor . I PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of • . • • • • • �� tl Summary i:f Developer's Agreement: Wilsun Ridge leveloper will develop the land as described in Exhibit A which is attached to and incorporated in the Developer's Agreement. In addition, the Developer's Agreement provides for: 1. '.ubmission of plans regarding sewer, water, and drainage to Engineering Department. 2. Submission to the City Engineer of a development Plan for the land. 3. '..ubmission to Watershed District of storm sewer construction plans. Developer to follow the rules and regulations of said Watershed District. 4. Developer's warranty of title to the land. 5. Construction and maintenance of public improvements which are to be conveyed to the City as well as preservation and restoration of areas surrounding said improvements. Submission of a bond or letter of credit to ensure the quality of said construction, maintenance, preservation, and restoration. 6. Dough grading to be performed by the Developer for improvements which the city will construct pursuant to 100% petition of all owners of the land. Submission of a bond or letter of credit for the rough grading. 7. Payment of first three (3) years'. street lighting, engineering review, and street signs costs. ( 8. Developer's commitment not to oppose rezoning if Developer fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months. g. Application of the Developer's Agreement to transferees of the land. 10. rity's remedies in the event that Developer violates the provisions of the Developer's Agreement. • • 11. Notice to the City's cable franchise. 12. Developer shall develop in conformance with designated land use guidelines for each site. 13. Developer shall provide street, utility, slope stabilization, and erosion Control plans and implement said plans as approved by the City Engineer. i 14. Developer shall provide scenic easements, public trails, and plans for . private trails and implement said plans as approved by the Director of Community Services. 't i 15. Developer shall prepare signage and landscape plans and implement said plans .. as approved by the Director of Planning. 'i ( 16. qeveloper agrees that no graded areas shall be left unrestored and that reas to be protected during construction shall be snow fenced. CI"%E 17. ,eveloper agrees to replace trees damaged or destroyed outside of the construction area per a replacement plan to be implemented upon approval by :he Director of Planning. 18. ')eveloper shall dedicate the necessary additional right-of-way for Valley View Road. 19. )eveloper agrees to install exterior lighting with cut-off luminars, 25 ft. in height, or less, and no lighting of atriums or skylights, such as uplights, shall be used within any of the structures. NOTICE: A printed copyof this ordinance is available for inspection byany p person during ragular office hours at the office of the City Clerk. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on , 1984. John D. crane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor • • • • • efiC • Norseman Gth Addition CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COMM, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 26-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the I-2 Park District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the 1-2 Park District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and • Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. ti Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of , entered into between Herliev and Borghild Hello, husband and wife, as joint tenants, and the City of Eden Prairie, dated as of , which Agreement is hereby made a part hereof. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 3rd day of April, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of ATTEST: 3ukiii D. Frane, l',ity Clerk Wolfgang N. henzel, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of 'TAc� Exhibit A • Description: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and that part of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 116 Range 2?, described as follows: beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, NORSEMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 4TH ADDITION: thence on an assumed. bearing of North 0 degrees 37 minutes 29 seconds West along the westerly line of said Lot 1 to the northwest corner of said Lotl; thence South 87 degrees 26 minutes 36 seconds West along the westerly extension of the northerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 42.00 feet; thence North 2 degrees 33 minutes 24 seconds West to the centerline of County Road No. 39; thence South 46 degrees 45 minutes 36 seconds West along said centerline, a distance of 143.09 feet; thence Westerly along said centerline, a distance of 240.02 feet along a tangential curve to the right, having a radius of 289.31 feet; thenceNorth 85 degrees 42 minutes 18 seconds West along said centerline, a distance of 397.29 feet; thence South 4 degrees 17 minutes • 42 seconds West, a distance at 35.00 feet; thence Southeasterly, a distance of 264.57 feet along a non-tangetial curve concave to the southwest, having a radius of 415.39 feet and a chord bearing of South 67 degrees 27 minutes 32 seconds East; thence Southerly, a distance of 432.58 feet along a non-tangetial curve, concave to the east, having a radius of 638.00 feet and a chord bearing of South 22 degrees 46 minutes 58 seconds West; thence South 3 degrees 21 minutes 32 seconds West, a distance of 248.13 feet to an intersection with a line which bears North 86 degrees 38 minutes 28 seconds West from the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, •NORSEMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 5TH ADDITION: thence South 86 degrees 38 minutes 28 seconds East, a distance of 645.97 feet to said northwest corner; thence North 2 degrees 17 minutes 36 seconds East, along the west line of West 74th Street as platted in NORSEMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 5TH ADDITION, a distance of 70.01 feet to the northwest corner of West 74th Street as platted in NORSEMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 5TH ADDITION: thence South 86 degrees 38 minutes 28 seconds East along the north line of said West 74th Street, a distance of 79.02 feet to the point of beginning. Except that part described as follows: That part of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 116, Range 22, described as follows: Commencing at the south- west corner of Lot 1, Block 1, NORSEMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 4TH ADDITION; thence on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 37 minutes 29 seconds West along the westerly line of said Lot 1 to the northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence South 87 degrees 26 minutes 36 seconds West along the westerly extension of the northerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 42.00 feet; thence North 2 degrees 33 minutes 24 seconds West to the centerline of County Road No. 39; thence South 46 degrees 45 minutes 36 seconds West along said centerline, a distance of 143:09 feet; thence Westerly along said centerline, a distance of 240.02 feet along a tangential curve to the right, having a radius of 289.31 feet; thence North 85 degrees 42 minutes 18 seconds West along said centerline, a distance of 32.27 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described; thence continuing North 85 degrees 42 minutes 18 :cccuids West, a distance of 184.04 feet; thence Southeasterly, a distance of 129.29 fret alone a non-tangential curve, concave to the southwest, having u redius of 485.39 feet and a chord hearing of South 48 degrees, 33 minutes 08 seconds Ea>,t; thence Northeasterly, a distant' of 96.01 fret along a non-tangential curve, concave to the southeast, hat -1g a radius of 638.00 foot, to the point of beginning. y`l j Norseman 6th Addition • DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT • • • • • THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1984, by and between HERLIEV IIELLE and GORGHILD HELLE, husband and wife, as joint tenants, hereinafter referred to as "Owners," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" • WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owners have applied to City for rezoning from Rural to I-2 Park for approximately 11.8 acres, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and hereafter referred to as "the property;" WOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Resolution i184-69, and • Ordinance V26-84, Owners covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: • • • • • • 1. Owners shall develop the property in conformance with the materials dated January 27, 1984, reviewed and approved by the City Council on April 3, 1984, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. Owners shall not • develop, construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein. 2. Owners covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Owners at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. . { 3. Prior to final plat of the property, Owners shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's approval of: A. Grading, drainage, and erosion control plans. Il, General plans for streets, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water• main. Owner shall submit a petition and City will take steps as arc necessary to construct the required public streets and • lr utilities within the roadways shown on the plat. The costs / of said construction shall be paid by an assessment:.levied t against benefitted properties under applicable statutes, City ordinance, and policy. The costs for oversizing of storm drainage pipes to accommodate drainage outside the limits of the plat shall not be charged to the owner. 4. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property, Owners shall submit to the City Planning Commission for review and recommendation, to the City Council for review, and receive the City Council's approval of information for site plan review, including, but not limited to, architectural elevations, site plans, grading plans, landscaping plans, and other plans as may be required for buildings to be constructed upon the property. The City's review process in this respect shall be consistent with that customarily afforded to all other developer's of 1-2 zoned property requiring site plan review prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Upon the owner's request for rezoning and/or platting of any of the • property flying south of the south right-of-way line of W. 74th Street (as existing and also extended west to the west line of the plat), Owners shall dedicate the right-of-way and agree to be responsible for all costs associated with the construction of a standard 37-foot wide industrial street and required utilities along • that portion of the future north-south collector street lying south of W. 74th Street , to the south line of the plat. 6. Owners shall notify the City .and the Nine Mile emCreCreek Waatershed District 48 hours prior to any grading, tree rcutting on the property. • • • • • I • Norseman 6th Addition CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-84 • A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE 26-84 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 26-84 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of --`, 1984; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: • A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 26-84, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 26-84 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, fff within 20 days after said publication. ADOPTEO by the City Council on , 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: ohn D. Frane, City Clerk Norseman 6th Addition The following is the full text of the City of Eden Prairie Ordinance No. 26-84, which was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on , 1984. Following the text of the Ordinance, the Developer's Agreement, which is incorporated therein by Section 5 of the Ordinance, is summarized. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 26-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. • • Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural Oistrict and be placed in the I-2 Park District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the I-2 Park District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section•5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of , entered into between Ilerliev and Borghild Helle, husband and wife, as joint tenants, and the City of Eden Prairie, dated as of , which Agreement is hereby made a part hereof. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 3rd day of April, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of ATTEST: 1., Jain I). franc, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Peniel, Mayor PUBLISHEDin the Eden Prairie News on the day of • f• Summary of Developer's Agreement: Horseman 6th Addition Owners will develop the land as described in Exhibit A which is attached to and incorporated in the Developer's Agreement. In addition, the Developer's Agreement provides for: • 1. Submission of plans regarding sewer, water, and drainage to Engineering • Department. 2. Submission to the City Engineer of a development Plan for the land. 3. Submission to Watershed District of storm sewer construction plans. Owners to follow the rules and regulations of said Watershed District. • 4. Owners' warranty of title to the land. • 5. Construction and maintenance of public improvements which are to be conveyed to the City as well as preservation and restoration of areas surrounding • • said improvements. Submission of a bond or letter of credit to ensure the • quality of said construction, maintenance, preservation, and restoration. • 6. Rough grading to be performed by the Owners for improvements which the City • will construct pursuant to 100a petition of all owners of the land. Submission of a bond or letter of credit for the rough grading. • 7. Payment of first three (3) years' street lighting, engineering review, and street signs costs. • • • 8. • Owners' commitment not to oppose rezoning if Owners fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months. 9. Application of the Developer's Agreement to transferees of the land. • 10. City's remedies in the event that Owners violate the provisions of the Developer's Agreement. 11. Notice to the City's cable franchise. 12. Owners to submit plans for grading, drainage, and erosion control, streets, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water mains to City Engineer and receive ;y approval thereof. Owners to submit petition for required public streets and utilities, assessments for which will be levied by City against benefitted properties. Costs for oversized of storm drainage pipes shall not be charged to Owners. 13. Owners shall submit plans for site plan review prior to building permit issuance, and receive City approvals thereof. 14. Owners shall dedicate the right-of-way and agree to be responsible for all costs associated with the construction of a standard 37-foot wide industrial street and utilities along for the north-south collector through the property at. the time of Owners' request for rezoning or platting of property to the south of the south right-of-way line of W. 74th Street. • I 15. Owners shall notify City and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District 48 hours prior to any grading, tree removal, or tree cutting on the property. NOTICE: A printed copy of this ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on , 1984. John D. Franc., City Clerk Wolfgang H. Pcnzel, Mayor • • • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • HENNEP'IN COUNTY, MINNL SOTA • RESOLUTION NO. 84-103 • • A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF COUNCIL APPROVAL OF O'NEILL OFFICE BUILDING FOR JACK BOSS, LT. AL, FOR AN OFFICE BUILDING ON 1.7 ACRES • • BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal for the O'Neill Office Building by Jack Boss, et. al, for a 30,400 sq. ft. office building on approximately 1.7 acres, located east of City West Parkway and north of Shady Oak Road, is herein approved subject to the following specific conditions: 1. The development plans, all Staff-dated April 25, 1984, and attached hereto shall apply. • 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, developer/owner shall: A. Submit to the Planning Department a revised landscape plan to provide an adequate amount of plantings and berming to effectively • screen parking areas and overhead doors from public view revising the plant material to reflect a 2-1/2 inch caliper minimum, 2-3/4 inch caliper average, for shade trees, and a six foot minimum height for coniferous trees. B. Receive approval of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans . from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Notify .the Watershed • District and City ata least 48 hours prior to grading or tree • removal. C. Provide necessary engineering plans relative to driveways, sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer. • D. All lightirg shall be down-cast, with 20 ft. maximum height for • poles within the parking areas. • E. Notify Hennepin County and the State of Minnesota Highway Department for any work to he done within road right-of-way and obtain the necessary permits therefor. F. Pay the required Cash Park Fee. • 3. Developer agrees to assessments for Shady Oak Road. • • 4. This property shalal he part of the City West owners' association for ownership and maintenance of common property. 5. Developer shall obtain an access easement from the property to the north and provide the property to the north with a parking easement-. ADOPTED by the City Council on , 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John U. Franc,, City Clerk 1 i • • • • • 991 • • O'Neill Office Building CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 29-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIIIIE., MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND 1N EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS ' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and shall be placed in the Office District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Office District and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its • passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of _ , and finally read and adopted and orderer{published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1984. ATTEST: } Shn D. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang N. Penzel, Mayor PUGLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of 1984. f That part of Outlot R, CITY WEST, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. lying suatinhcsterly of the following described line; Cemnencing at the most southeasterly corner of said Outlet B; j. thence North 3S"42'07" East, assoteed bearing, along the south- easterly line of said Outlot B. a distance of 65.34 feet to the easterly line of said Outlot B; thence North O'13'23" West, along the easterly line of said Outlet B. a distance of 93.74 feet to the southeasterly line of said Outlet B. thence North i 48'44'29" East, along the southeasterly line of said Outlot B, a distance of 86.79 feet to the point of beginning of line to be described; thence North 69°58'50" West a distance of 305.04 feet to the westerly line of said Outlet B and there said line terminates. • • Together with that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter • of Section 1, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County. Minnesota. described ' as follows: i tormenting at the cost southeasterly corner of said Outlet B; j thence North 35'42'37' East, assumed bearing, along the south- t easterly line of said Outlot 8. a distance of 65.34 feet to the • easterly line of said Outlet 8 and the point of beginning of • land to be described; thence North 0'13'23" West, along the . easterly line of said Outlet B. a distance of 93.74 feet to the • southeasterly line of said Outlot Li; thence North 48'44'29" East, along the southeasterly line of said Outlet B. a distance of 86.79 feet; thence South 69'58'5J" East a distance of 29.76 '� feet; thence South 32'29'02" West a distance of 172.81 feet to the point of beginning. • • Including the following: • Parcel 20 S.C. 2763 (169e5) 901 • • That part of Tract A described below: i i, Tract A. That part of Section 1, Township 116 North, Range 22 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point 22 rods south and S rods East of the northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 1; thence south to County Road No. 61; thence southeasterly and northeasterly along County Road . No. 61 to a point 32 rods east at right angles from the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence north to the north line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence west 24 rods; thence south to the point of beginning; whirls lies southeasterly of Line 1 described below and northwesterly of Line 2 described below: ) Line 1. Beginning at a point on the west line of Tract A hereinbefore described, distant 460 feet south of the northwest corner thereof; thence run northeasterly to a } point on the east line of sail Tract A, distant 90 feet • south of the northeast corner thereof and there terminating: Line 2. Beginning at the southwest corner of the East Half of the • Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 1; thence run southwesterly to a point distant 260"feet northwesterly (measured at right angles) of a point on Line 3 described below, distant 150 feet southwesterly of its point of termination; thence run southwesterly to a point distant 385 feet northwesterly (•eearuced at right angles) of a point on said Line 3, distant 500 feet southwesterly of its point of termination; thence run southwesterly to a point on the west line of Tract A hereinhnfore described,. • distant 195 feet southerly of a point thereon distant 22 cols south and e rods east of the northwest corner of the. li Northeast Quarter of the Southwest luerter of said Section 1 and there terminating; Line 1. ;beginning at a print on the south line of sail Section 1, distant: 1157.72 feet. east of the snut.hwes: corner thereof; - thence run northen::t;ply at an angle of 9; degt,es 19 minutee ie eeen,,ls I.te's ;ail +mouth '.rrtioe line (v-.•a_ured from, wept to north) for 550.77 'feet; theme deflect to the right on a Si degree 14 ',lahete 00 'ancond :nave (lvlta angle (11' 17 degrees 05 n,i•rates 59 seconde) f:,, 114).9'1 ,Net; th^nr.,. ,l J on taneeet to e..il core, Ior 905.34 feet ledthere Flying Cloud Business Center CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 36-83 AN ORDINANCE O( THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE • ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: • Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. • Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and shall be placed in the I.2 Park District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, • and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the • I-2 Park District and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its 1 passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1984. ATTEST: John D. Franc, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor • PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1984. • LEGAL DESCRIPTION Legal for Plat Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 and McKinley Lane, all in McKinley First Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof. And part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 1, Township 116 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian lying northerly of the north line of McKinley First Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said plat; thence northerly, along the northerly extension of the easterly line of said plat, a distance of 126.46 feet to a point on a line which runs parallel with and is 35.00 feet southerly of the center line of the East frontage road for New United States Highway No. 169; thence westerly and southwesterly, along said parallel line, a distance of 342.66 feet to said north line of McKinley First Addition; thence easterly, along said north line, a distance of 341.95 feet to said point of beginning. • Legal for Zoning That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 1, Township 116 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian lying northerly of the north line of McKinley First Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said plat; thence northerly, along the northerly extension of the easterly line of said plat, a distance of 126.46• feet to a point on a line which runs parallel with and is 35.00 feet southerly of the center line of the East frontage road for New United States Highway No. 169; thence westerly and southwesterly, along said parallel line, a distance of 342.66 feet to said north line of McKinley First Addition; thence easterly, along said north line, a distance of 341.95 feet to said point of beginning. 4a� • CITY OF [DEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, h11NNESOTA • 'r RESOLUTION NO. 84-109 A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF COUNCIL APPROVAL OF FLYING CLOUD BUSINESS CENTER FOR INVESTMENt SERVICES GROUP, INC. FOR AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ON 2.9 ACRES BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal for a Flying Cloud Business Center by Investment Services Group, Inc., for an industrial building on 2.9 acres, located at the southeast corner of Flying Cloud Drive and McKinley Lane, is herein approved subject to the following specific conditions: 1. The development plans all Staff-dated May 9, 1984, and attached hereto shall apply. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, developer/owner shall: A. Submit to the Engineering Department, plans for sanitary sewer, storm sewer plans, and any easements necessary therefor and receive Engineering Department approval thereof. B. Locate hydrants at the southeast and southwest corners of the structure. C. Receive Watershed District approval. • D. Submit a revised landscape plan to the Planning Department illustrating screening of the loading areas, parking areas, and rooftop mechanical equipment from Flying Cloud Drive. Also, include in the plans sodding and staking of the 33% slope located in the northeast portion of the site. E. Pay the required Cash Park Fee. 3. The signage plan shall be consistent with City Code requirements. ADOPTED by the City Council on , 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: • ohn Dn Fnanen pity Clerk • 9% MEMORANDUM ,. TO: Mayor and City Council • • FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning IUNOUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager DATE: May 10, 1984 SUBJECT: Sale of Excess City Land to Investment Services Group, Inc. • • In mid-1981, Tony Feffer of Investment Services Group, Inc., approached the City of Eden Prairie regarding sale of 33,700 sq. ft. of property at the southeast corner of 1 Shady Oak •Road and Flying Cloud Drive. This property was excess right-of-way acquired by the State of Minnesota during the construction of Highway i169, which 'was turned over to the City as excess right-of-way, with a restriction included that would allow the property to be used for road purposes only. Staff had made the • Council aware and gained the Council's direction regarding sale of this property to • Mr. Feffer last'year at the time of the first reading of his rezoning of the property. City property was to be combined with property that Mr. Feffer owned to provide for Flying Cloud Business Center, an office/showroom project. We have an appraisal dated February 12, 1982, completed by Mr. Terrence M. Johnson M. A. I., which includes the value of the property at S29,000. Staff would recommend that because of the intervening time between the appraisal and the current offer to purchase, that the sale price should be"S32,000 at this point in time, with the City conveying a quit-claim deed to the purchaser. The price of the land took into account topographic constraints of the property, the fact that the property was most usable when combined with another tract of land directly adjacent to it, and • the restriction of use, which will have to be dealt with, left by MNDOT on the • property. i May 15, 1984 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. R84-110 RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT , • WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed to make the following improvements; • I.C. 52-011, Improvements to Eden Road between Glen Lake and T.H.169, including a review of the feasibility of • constructing Sinyletree Lane between Eden Road and Prairie Center Dr. and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111. li NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study with the assistance of RCM, Inc. and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and presented to • the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment and feasi- bility of the proposed improvements. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 15, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. franc, Clerk • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT • t To The Eden Prairie City Council: The undersigned property owners herein petition the Eden Prairie City Council to consider making the following described improvements(s): (General Location) • Sanitary Sewer v/ Watermain Edc>x. NiLc{_p F. C-1-EJ.1-Oa'(1Tr c'x. 641) / µ V Storm Sewer (,/' Street Paving i1 Other • Street Address or Other Legal Description of Names of Petitioners Pr• •,rty to be Served (Must Be Property Owners) dr Arr i , 1_ )L, < - =_cam,LsA!, , _'7 $ Ec&&_ t/2 ti /61_i ,--cI.rxe 4i 1 G✓e e4..e.,e e rAlze!„1‘:. —(-4%_C , . 1-1 -=.:}4.14%...e_. .-) , . (` - Wit:_- T-t=1it• ./'-/'I /`_,`�)nr,'r. (For City Use) • / l Date Received A,..It. 4/`}9 Project No. $L_o 1l Council Consideration /diblr_i/CA;r/ I-)7 • April 11, 1984 Carl Julie City Manager City of Eden Prairie Mr. Julie: I have discussed the need of completion of Single Tree Lane and Eden Road for the ease of traffic and access with Amoco Oil Company representatives. It is our belief that the major center area traffic patterns would be much improved by this completion and I urge your-consideration • for 1984 on this proposal. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, n Mark. Namtvedt Amoco Oil Dealer 8100 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 t y99 a Cr ,e_s , 1N0 895 so re ..—i!0 _, Sa a,�.�%-his ot R•ii;^ • • S/ o.. --_ IOC) 7. Zoo ..' Pore Lot (72/7) of 18 A® T 1 I y ti 3 r( R. L 4�e9 �y as 1. b 0 t- _700 , a . 30••,�1 v Oo ✓ N 0s'NA e`''p � ,A03`"'• NO. d : / —}_�CC .� G47 r38 78 �._i1_t8_ ,Sq C'g Jd.. w~y b,n E , � o rdJ2. of.e ' 44 ▪ P6/ ` u, C /�Q1 • Q .� --i-- ro• ," , es z e R L.S. < `• ' 'r' .,,-*/`-;:t' '.4" • p-—I ,,- !,.. -No.369 ^-.. :,....,:a,„ ._ i „,,,..., e --r6,- .-t. ,. 2.., -• 1 ed g , 6 , ,,....1. ______,,_:„..Luu__ t.,,, .,...- •.•::, cs L., ,„` C` ' ./>' ' `Pif' -0'''i 'A-1, 0 2,,;,� `/ '1.. A` cP r. . ..I , � / p/CENIfRG.If Rae., r �Y •,nrn MI r eta�'" l•1' • 2).\ c. 4 r` '• / • ' " '1 V t��y i • • • • •1984 April 26, 1984 • • Mr. Carl Jullie City Manager CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Carl: Re: Upgrading of Eden Road Please consider this letter a formal request that the City of Eden Prairie begin the upgrading of Eden Road as soon as possible. We understand that the special assessment involved would be approximately $75.00 per front foot spread over 17 years or so at an interest rate to be established. This would be acceptable to us. With the future developments taking place in the Eden Glen area as well • as the probability of Sheraton breaking ground this year, we feel it is necessary to have a 9 ton black top. road in 1984. Please consider this request along with the other requests you will be receiving from the owners along Eden Road. Yours very truly, EBERHARDT � / r Bruce C. Bermel, SIR Senior Vice President BCB/jmc cc: John Temon • 32so N•,•st{ Ih Street I'.n.11r,x 1155 hlinnrapulis,hlinursula 55.140 6I2 :131.92K0 100 • ROMAN ROAD PROPERTIES 2338 Central Avenue Northeast Minneapolis, Minnesota 55418 MAY " 1984 , April 30, 1984 t • Carl Julie, City Manager EDEN PRAIRIE CITY HALL Eden Prairie, Minnesota Dear Mr. Julie: This letter is to express our support and concern of the much needed road improvements to Eden Road which runs in front of property we currently own in Eden Prairie. Along with the other property owners in this area, we sincerely hope the City is planning major improvements, including the paving of this major road. Sincerely, ROMAN ROAD PROPERTIES, /Siii letree &fice Building (7-747 .6 / . 0441/d: Charles H. Cornell, Partner CHC/eas • 1002 • May 15, 1984 • ' CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. R84-116 • • RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed to make the following improvements; I.C. 52-065, Utility and street Improvements for 74th St., Golden Triangle Drive, and Valley View Road. and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study with the assistance of RCM, Inc, and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and presented to • the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment and feasi- bility of the proposed improvements. • ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 15, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: • SEAL • John D. Irene, Clerk • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT To The Eden Prairie City Council: The undersigned property owners herein petition the Eden Prairie City Council to consider making the following described improvements(s): (General Location) X Sanitary Sewer Installation of streets shown in plat X Watermain of Norseman Ind. Park, 6th Add. . X Storm Sewer __ X Street Paving i Other • Street Address or Other /1 i Legal Description of Name of Petitioners Pro ert to be Served Must a Property-Owners) � Y l l' Extention of W. 74th St. 11//J�/��l t ' %�-ter • ----_. --.— `filer civ l 11e Golden Triangle Dr. j Valley View Rd. �,Ls�27/ 1- �� 7 ,ylliorghild Hale The city may at its sole _ — discretion make a temporary intersection between Golden Triangle Rd. and Valley View Road • and then improve Valley View Rd. _ et a later date, in connection —._ with a longer sectiauof Valley View Rd. (For City Use) Date Received MAv9 08 ___--- _ Project No. S2-C?w, • Council Consideration _MA_LiS,r9841 C)U1 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 84-117 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements to wit: . r • I.C.52-0598, Carmel Addition and Vicinity Improvements and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be received until 10:00 A.M. on Thursday, June 14, 1984, at the Eden Prairie Fire Station, 7901 Mitchell Road, at which time they will be publically opened by The Deputy City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday, June 19, 1984, at the School Board Room, B10O School Road, Eden Prairie. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 15, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Franc, Clerk r CITY DF EDEN PRAIRIE • • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-111 ' l A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF EDEN GLEN 4TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Eden Glen 4th Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and,all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL DF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for Eden Glen 4th Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated May 7, 1984. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Deeds and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required by lISA 462.358, Subd. 3. C. That the City•Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on May 15, 1984. • • Wirfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST SEAL • John O.Franc, Clerk___ • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL. PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene. A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician DATE: May 7, 1934 SUBJECT: EDEN GLEN 4TH ADDITON PROPOSAL: The developer, Jesco, Inc., has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Eden Glen 4th Addition. This is a replat of Lot 2, Block 1, Eden Glen 2nd Addition, containing approximately 4.9 acres to be divided into 2 lots. Lot 1 is intended for the construction of a one- story office/retail building and Lot 2 for the construction of a bank/office building. The plat is located east of Glen Lane and north of Single Tree Lane in the North 1/2 of Section 14. HISTORY: Second reading of Ordinance 34-84 zoning Lot 1 to Community Regional . Service is scheduled for May 22, 1984. Ordinance 15-84 zoning Lot 2 to Commercial Regional Service was finally read and approved by the City Council on February 21, 1984. The preliminary plat for 4.9 acres was approved by the City Council February 7, 1984, per Resolution 84-21. Resolutions 84-121 and 84-32, referred to within this report, summarize specific conditions of approval for Lot 1 and Lot 2 respectively. Resolution 84-121 is scheduled for City Council approval on May 22, 1984. VARIANCES: i All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: • All municipal utilities and streets necessary to serve the site have been installed. On-site extension of the utilties will.be privately owned and maintained. i I PARK DEDICATION: a The park dedication requirements are covered in the Summary Resolutions. BONDING: Development of this site does not require the installation of additional public utilities, therefore, bonding will not be required. RICO:r1ENDATION: Recoimnend approval of the final plat of Eden Glen 4th Addition, subject VI r RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Eden Glen 4th Addition, subject to the requirements of this report, the Summary Resolutions and the following: 1. Receipt of Engineering fee in the amount of $120.00. 2. Approval of this plat is subject to the conditions imposed on Lot 1 resulting from the rezoning of the parcels. DLO:sg cc: Mr. David Reimer Mr. Mark Dongoske • { CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE L4 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-112 . A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF WELSH ADDITION . WHEREAS, the plat of Welsh Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for Welsh Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated May 7, 1984. i B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of 1 this Resolution in the office of the Register of Oeeds and/or • Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. i 3. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. AOOPTEO by the City Council on May 15, 1984. • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST SEAL • John D. Franc, Clerk Kali • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE `'i r ENGIN[CRING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT • TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works CC ,, y� FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician �(/p e DATE: May 7, 1984 SUBJECT: WELSH ADDITION PROPOSAL: ' The developer, Welsh Construction, has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Welsh Addition, located east of Prairie Center Drive and north of West 78th Street in the North 1/2 of Sections 13 and 14. The site consists of approximately 4.7 acres to be divided into 2 lots, each containing a multi-story office building. HISTORY: Ordinances 27-83 and 2-84 zoned the property to Office for Lots 1 and 2 respectively and were finally read and approved by the City Council on • July 19, 1983, and February 7, 1984, respectively. j. The preliminary plat for this site was approved by the City Council on March 27, 1984, per Resolution 84-55. Resolutions 83-180 and 84-18, referred to within this report, summarize ,. specific conditions of approval for Lots 1 and 2 respectively. • VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. • i UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities and streets necessary to serve this plat have 1 been installed. ' A cross access easement for the shared access between the two lots was • required in the staff report dated March 2, 1984. A copy of the recordable easement document must be provided to the Engineering Department prior to release of the final plat. s PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication must conform to the requirements of the Eden Prairie City Code. 1 BONDING: Public utilities will not be installed within this plat, therefore, bonding will not be required. RECOMMENDATION: • I Recommend approval of the final plat of Welsh Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Summary Resolutions and the following: 1. Receipt of Engineering fee in the amount of $100.00. 2. Receipt of copy of cross easement for access. DLO:sg cc: Mr. Jim Arbuckle • • • • • toil CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION N0. 84-113 • RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT EDEN BLUFFS WHEREAS, the plat of Eden Bluffs has been submitted in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and Ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: • ' A. Plat approval request for Eden Bluffs is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated May 8, 1984. B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving the six month maximum time elapse betwQen the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said Engineer's report. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3. D. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. E. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on May 15, 1984. Wolfgang H. Pcnzel, Mayor ATTEST SEAL John D. [raw, Clerk 10 a • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members • THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: Oavid L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician x720 • • DATE: May 8, 1934 SUBJECT: EDEN BLUFFS • PROPOSAL: The developer, Baton Corporation, has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Eden Bluffs. The plat consists of 40 multiple family units within approximately 6.0 acres located south of Pioneer Trail (Co. Rd. 1) and north of Bluffs East First Addition in the South 1/2 of Section 25. • HJSTORY: • . • The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on July 19, 1983, per Resolution 83-169. • Zoning to RM 6.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on July 5, 1983, per Ordinance 14-83. • The Oeveloper's Agreement referred to within this report was executed on • • July 5, 1983. VARIANCES: A variance from the requirements of City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A, waiving the six month maximum time elapse between approval of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be necessary. All other variance requests not covered by the Developer's Agreement, • must be processed through the Board of Appeals. • • UTILTIES AND STREETS: • Municipal utilities, streets, and walkways will be installed throughout the plat by the developer in conformance with the requirements of the Oeveloper's Agreement and City Standards. • Ownership and maintenance of all private utilities, roadways and parking areas will be by the Homeowner Association. A copy of the recordable Association documents covering the ownership and maintenance 11 responsibilities most be received and approved by the Engineering Department prior to release of the final plat. Drainage and utility easements along platted roadways and property lines will be shown on the final plat prior to release. } This property will be assessed for trunk sewer and water at the n„v ili„n ,,I“ AI Il,„ f.11 loln .vim„„1,1,..,h PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. BONDING: The requirements for bonding are covered in the Developer's Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Eden Bluffs subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: 1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $210.00. 2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $1,404.00. 3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $1,200.00. 4. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. 5. Receipt of copy of recordable Homeowner Association documents. 6. Receipt of a 100% petition for trunk sewer and water assessments. DLO:sg cc . Randy Zejdlik 1r. Thomas J. O'Nalley • IC 1U14 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. 83-114 4 RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT MARK CHARLES SECOND ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Mark Charles Second Addition has been submitted in the manner required for platting laud under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and Ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for Mark Charles Second Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated May 7, 1984. B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said Engineer's report. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Registrar of•Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3. D. . That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. E. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on May 15, 1984. Wolfgang IFTenze ,ITayor I ATTEST SEAL 1014) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician DATE: May 7, 1934 SUBJECT: MARK CHARLES SECOND ADDITION PROPOSAL: The developer, Urban Unit Corporation, has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Mark Charles Second Addition. The plat is located east of Franlo Road and south of County Road 1 in the South 1/2 of Section 25. This addition will constitute phase 2 and will consist of 12 single family residential cluster lots and 18 residential multiple units. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on October 18, 1983, per Resolution 83-252. • Zoning to RM 6.5 and RI 9.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on November 1, 1983, per Ordinance 51-83. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed on November 1, 1983. VARIANCES: A variance from the requirements of City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A, waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be necessary. All other variance requests not covered within the Developer's Agreement must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All utilities, streets and walkways within the plat will be installed by the Developer in conformance with City Standards. This property will be assessed for trunk sewer and water at the prevailing rate at the fall, 1984, assessment hearing. A roadway to be located within Outlot D will be installed through a future phase of construction. The roadway w•ri11 be privately owned and maintained, therefore, future platting of this roadway must include an Ar explanation of maintenance responsibilities in a format acceptable to the City Attorney. The requirements for the installation of walkways within the plat are covered in the Developer's Agreement. {OI(o • PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. BONDING: The requirements for bonding are covered in the Developer's Agreement. RECOMiENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Mark Charles Second Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement, and the following: 1. Receipt of fee for street lighting in the amount of $1,404.00. 2. Receipt of fee for street signs in the amount of $310.00. 3. Receipt of fee for engineering in the amount of $900.00. 4. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. 5. Receipt of a 10D% petition for trunk sewer and water assessments. DLO:sg cc: Mr. Mark Peterka (I • • • Ion .: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-119 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF CITY WEST THIRD ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of City West Third Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for City West Third Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated May 8, 1984. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Deeds and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. t 3. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of 'i this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on May 15, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST SEAL 11( John D.Franc, Clerk 1o+`d • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician 0a((f) DATE: May 8, 1984 SUBJECT: CITY WEST THIRD ADDITIDN (formerly O'Neill Office and City West Convention Hotel PROPOSAL: The developer, Richard W. Anderson, Inc., has requested City Council approval of the final plat of City West Third Addition, located east of City West Parkway and north of Shady Oak Road (Co. Rd. 61) in the South 1/2 of Section 1. This is a replat of Outlot A, City West Second Addition containing approximately 7.2 acres. Lot 1 is intended for the construction of a multiple story office building (O'Neill Office and Lot 2 for the construction of a hotel (City West Convention Hotel). HISTORY: The preliminary plat for the O'Neill Office was approved by the City Council on May 1, 1984, per Resolution 84-86. The Preliminary Plat for the City West Convention Hotel, Resolution 84- 118, is scheduled for City Council considerations on June 5, 1984. Second reading of Drdinance 29-84 zoning Lot 1 (O'Neill Office) to Office is scheduled for May 15, 1984. Second reading of Ordinance 39-84, zoning Lot 2 (City West Convention Hotel) to Commercial Regional Service, is scheduled for July 10, 1984. Resolution 84-103, referred to within this report, summarizing specific conditions for approval of Lot 1, is scheduled for City Council approval on May 15, 1984. A Developer's Agreement, referred to within this report covering Lot 2 (City West Convention Center), is scheduled for execution on July 10, 1984. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All public utilities and streets necessary to serve the sites have been installed. PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication shall conform to the requirements of the Eden Prairie City Code and the Developer's Agreement. (OTC) BONDING: Public utilities and streets will not be installed within this site, therefore, bonding will not be required. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of City West Third Addition subject to the requirements of this report, Resolution 84-103, the Developer's Agreement, and the following: 1. Receipt of Engineering fee in the amount of $140.00. 2. Approval of this plat is subject to the conditions imposed on ' Lot 2 resulting from the rezoning of the parcels. 3. Receipt of recordable easement documents to cover cross parking as referred to within the May 4, 1984, Planning Staff report. DLO:sg cc: Mr. Scott Anderson Ar . • ' 3 { C j 1U: • • Eden Promo Chamber of Commerce � G /"1 m —'''. \.i V 11' • Fden Rome Health Center 0455 I i)4ng Cloud Drove tr. fii 5.��� f U't" Eden Ronre MN S5344 1� t'11 as L 1 r 1.(_ 71 Phone 652 044 2030 1 11�\ . ', ' J%\-i�' Pomao A Wemroren.My Cheese Shop.Revdent s 2 f`� /l", Rue L Chance.Chance/Nelson G Atsoaores Vice Fllendent )lj \!�-i Li 11 V Robert 0 FKIcson Soper Wlu Stores.Inc.Vice Resodenr ,� Gory P Flynn.Amencon Fomiy Inwronce Co..SecretoryfIreon rer il}1l -Lt George C Fienrey.Payroll20C0 Post Presodenr ill' li 4'3 Marione D.Fr edenchs.Execvnve Deem May 3, 1934 Mayor Wolfgang Pen zel City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road 111 Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344 Dear Wolf: Would you please take this to the council meeting for approval. The Small Business Awareness Committee is interested in promoting Small Business in Eden Prairie and this is one way they have found to help. Thank you and if you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely. Marge Friederichs . Executive Director MDF:ch • . I foa3 • 1,•rnrnn,,o-i•e., .t... aCur.,.«,*V..tt,I.Md.AN 4'Ya•,Tpw,rtq c0r4o0J0 sUc.1: V,.AI 4,0 nnJ,....».Nnn•n,,a,rt,,,•14,,ann M r,.I.rv,n+,rt.r,At Imp.. PROCLAMATION SMALL BUSINESS WEEK MAY 13-19, 1984 WHEREAS, The Small Businesses of Eden Prairie have and continue to play a vital role in the econanic well being of our community; and WHEREAS, The Small Businesses of Eden Prairie provide full-time and part-time employment for the citizens of our city; and WHEREAS, The taxes paid by Small Businesses help support vital city services to all citizens of Eden Prairie and dollars paid in School taxes provide educational funds for the children of Eden Prairie; and WHEREAS, Small Businesses of Eden Prairie contributed a majority of funds to those organizations which help provide an overall liveability in Eden Prairie (EPAA , Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, etc.); and WHEREAS, The Small Business community is the heart of the free enterprise system that has made this country a leader in the world; and WHEREAS, The Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce Small Business Awareness Committee had dedicated itself to the recognition of Small Business through its program of activities for Small Business in Eden Prairie; NOW THEREFORE, i Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor of the City of Eden Prairie, do hereby proclaim the week of May 13-19, 1984 as ' SMALL BUSINESS WEEK in the City of Eden Prairie, and encourage all citizens to support and recognize the Eden Prairie business and professional community that provides direct benefits through jobs, taxes, and services to us as the citizens of this prosperous city. dated this day of May, 1984 _of fga(P gi e1, Mayor City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota 102). • May 15', 1984 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNES0TA • - • RESOLUTION 84-91 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND • PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR BRVANT LAKE OFFICE TECH CENTER WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 27th • day of March, 1984, fixed the 17th day of April as the date for a'public hearing on the following proposed improvements. I.C. 52-053, Utility and Street Improvements for . Bryant Lake Office Tech Center. WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the Council hearing through • two weekly publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held on the 17th day of April, 1984, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 2. The City Engineer is hereby designated -as the Engineer for this project and is hereby directed to prepare - • 'plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. • ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 15, 1984 (April 17 public hearing continued to this date).• • Wolfgang H. Pet—Till, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John U. Franc, Clerk • 41, • •1t ., • I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-104 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and, WHEREAS, the proposal of Condon-Naegele Joint Venture for development of Sou h1Wpst Crossing_Phase IL for Industrial use requires the amendment of the Plan; i. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: approximately 11.3 acres located west of Washington Avenue and north of I-494 be modified from Office to Industrial. ADOPTEO by the City Council of Eden Prairie this day of , 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: • John D. Franc, City Clerk SEAL I I3 \q CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Ir RESOLUTION NO. 84-105 • A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SOUTHWEST CROSSING PHASE II PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT TO THE CONDON-NAEGELE GOLDEN STRIP PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the Southwest Crossing Phase II is considered a proper amendment to the Condon-Naegele Planned Unit Development Concept; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the request of Condon-Naegele Joint Venture for PUD Concept Amendment approval to the Condon-Naegele Golden Strip Planned Unit Development for Southwest Crossing Phase II and recommended approval of the PUD Concept Wnendment to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on May 15, 1984; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Southwest Crossing Phase II PUD Concept Amendment, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval to the Condon-Naegele Golden Strip Planned Unit Development Concept as outlined in the revised application materials for the Southwest Crossing Phase II, dated March 20, 1984, and supporting material dated March 5, 1984. 3. That the PUD Concept Amendment meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated April 23, 1984. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this _ day of , 1984. • • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: • g John D. Franc!, City Clerk i CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 111 RESOLUTION #84-106 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SOUTHWEST CROSSING PHASE II FOR VANTAGE COMPANIES BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Southwest Crossing Phase II for Vantage Companies dated March 20, 1984, for one lot on 11.3 acres, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. • ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of , 1984. • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • • • • I STAFF REPORT ; TO: Planning Commission FROM: Mike Franzen, Senior Planner TROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning • DATE: April 20, 1984 PROJECT: Southwest Crossing, Phase II APPLICANT: Condon-Naegele, Vantage Joint Venture REQUEST: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Industrial, Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment and Planned Unit Development District Review for 36.89 acres; Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 Park for 11.3 acres; and Preliminary Plat for one lot on 11.3 acres; to accommodate the construction of five office ' industrial buildings; with variances Background `: 8014 cv The Comprehensive Guide Plan identi- 1-2 raY . • 4 fies an office land use for this �r m n site. Surrounding land uses are ;.I m_ .- ' primarily office and commerical. i ,,. r` . The site is at a focal point within �J/ i :; cc the major center area and within � a close proximity to a large amount of f Nexisting commercial and regional � ='' -- office development, including Eden V\-`.'> - Prairie Center, Hartford Insurance, ."\ PROPOSED SITE v Gelco, and Cherne. Access to this .•r 1 ,1,a J site is from four principal routes: \ 1�� h N. I-494 from the north and east, ' ' \,• ,,v` /L.- � �,'.— Highway #169/212 from the southwest T y� and northeast, Washington Avenue/- `` • "----• ' .' Road #18 from the north, and ` ,, ;,: �'i`F" ------,--,---- County ` Highway #�5 from the west. Vantage ' 1 / •v� I Y has an overall master plan for 65 ` / i;'i /, .•'' '•(' S �a' .`I I 80-_r a acres of land north of I-494, which 3I�I ! j...•,, ` r� was the site of the 1975 Condon- C-1#EG Naegele proposal for commercial and \��---�-.- office related uses with several -r=_ _7_±" �_--_ auto dealerships. Vantage's master — --— - plan identifies intense office usage , ' -3 78 2G on the western portion of the ,•7339 N242 1.5PK OFC project area near Prairie Center ,,s0f C=C 'bFC. Drive and office/showroom uses p -:�, I ( f towards the eastern side of the site AREA LOCA ,,1CY MAP !! 1 1 • Southwest Crossing II 2 April 20, 1984 'Gar the Viking Training facility. The Commission recently reviewed a request from Vantage, which involved the construction of a 247,000 square foot office building on the western edge of the Vantage site near the Prairie Center Drive and Smetana Lake. Vantage's immediate request involves a Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment and District Review for approximately 36.89 acres of land, including approximately eleven acres as a natural area around Nine Mile Creek. Vantage Properties proposes to construct a complex of five office/service/showroom and tech buildings, located along the future extension of Viking Drive, containing approximately 100,000 square feet of space, oriented towards natural site amenities and Highway #494. The buildings will be single story, twelve feet clear height, with the exterior to be finished in brick and glass. Site Character The site has a rolling topography, with varied slopes ranging from five to fifteen percent and above. There is an existing wooded knoll in the northeast corner of the site, which rises to an elevation of 934 feet. The level area of the site, adjacent to proposed Viking Drive extension, has been cleared of vegetation and will be the primary area of development. The northern area of the site, which has a larger grouping of mature oak trees, will be left undisturbed as part of the current project requests. This project involves a re-platting of Golden Strip East. The final plat indicates lf an area shown as Outlot B adjacent to Nine Mile Creek, which was dedicated for ` - public purposes. The northern portion of Outlet A was also set aside as unusable acreage for the purposes of protecting woodland and floodplain areas. • Shoreland Management • This 36-acre site lies adjacent to Nine Mile Creek. Since land area adjacent to Nine Mile Creek was dedicated •as an outlet to the City for public purposes, the 36- acre Vantage project is not an abutting lot and restrictions relative to height, extent of hard surface allowable, and lot sizes, do not apply. There is an existing flood plain area on this site, which lies at an elevation of 840 along the northern portion of the site adjacent to Nine Mile Creek. Site Plan The site plan shows a series of five office/showroom/tech buildings to be constructed parallel to proposed Viking Drive, with building sizes ranging from 14,4D0 to 25,750 square feet. Current front and side yard setback requirements for I-2 zoning are 50 ft. for building and parking along the front yard and 25 ft. for building and parking along the side yard. The proponent is asking for a variance to permit a front yard along Viking Drive to be 17.5 ft., and a variance to permit a 17.5 ft. side yard along proposed Golden Triangle Drive. The proponent is seeking these variances since they feel that the existing grades towards the rear of the site become much more severe, and smaller front yard will allow the buildings to be located forward on-site so that minimal grading will occur and maximum amount of IItree cover can be retained. During initial conversations with Vantage, Staff indicated that variances for front and side: yards were possible, provided parking areas could be effectively screened from Viking Drive and proposed Golden Triangle Drive. Southwest Crossing II 3 April 20, 1984 Analyzing specifically the setback from Viking Drive, Staff feels that the land area provided will not be adequate to effectively screen parking areas from public view for the the following reasons: The right-of-way for Viking Drive is currently established at 60 ft. and the curb-to-curb width of Viking Drive will be 48 ft., leaving six feet of right-of-way on both sides of the road. In addition, along the north side of Viking Drive, there is a 10 ft. drainage utility easement, which, in effect, provides for 70 ft. of right-of-way. There will be a need for a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the north side of Viking Drive, which will be setback approximately five feet from the back of the curb of Viking Drive, leaving a green space of approximately 13.5 feet to the parking areas. This 13.5-ft. green area is not adequate enough to provide for effective screening. Staff would recommend that the green area from the back of the sidewalk to the parking areas be a minimum of 31 ft. to accommodate a four-foot high berm at a 3-1 slope, supplemented with additional shrub, evergreen, and deciduous overstory tree plantings. We, therefore, believe that the setback requirement from the road right-of-way should be a minimum of 35 ft., which is reflective of minimum setback requirements for office zoning districts. Staff would feel comfortable with recommending a 15 ft. variance from the 50 ft. front yard setback requirement in I-2 zoning districts provided these changes are made in the site plan. As previously mentioned, normally one of the corner front yard setbacks in an I-2 • zoning district would be 25 ft. to parking. The proponent is seeking a variance to allow parking within 17.5 ft. of the property line adjacent to proposed Golden Triangle Drive. A five-foot wide concrete sidewalk will be constructed within road right-of-way along the west side of proposed Golden Triangle Drive, located five 7- feet from the back of the curb, leaving six feet of green area between the sidewalk and the beginning of the property line. The City does not allow berming to allow within road right-of-way; therefore, berming and plantings would have to occur within the 17.5 ft. setback as provided by the proponent. Staff feels that this front yard setback requirement should a minimum of 30 ft. to accommodate a four-foot high berm and 3-1 slope, and supplemented with additional plantings. Architecture The proponent intends to construct five buildings totalling 1D0,000 square feet of floor area. The buildings will be single story, twelve feet clear height, with the exterior finish on all sides of the buildings to be mason-laid brick and glass. Rooftop mechanical units will be screened by a pre-finished metal panels. These panels should be compatible with the color of the brick of the building. The proponent should identify the color of the brick and screening elements. The service entrance is at the rear of the building, and access to' each individual bay is by an on-grade double door. • • Gradin2 and Drainage The proponent has provided a mass grading plan, which indicates areas for cut and fill. Storm water run-off will sheet drain across the site and parking areas into catch basins within the parking areas. These catch basins are connected to a storm sewer network. Storm water run-off for the eastern most portion of the site will he Idirected towards a storm sewer system within existing Viking Drive. Storm water run-off from the middle and western portions of the site will drain through future storm sewer improvements to be constructed along with Viking Drive. Considering the extent of hard surface areas on the site, there may be a need for additional catch basins. Southwest Crossing II 4 April 20, 1984 Ar 11, 4inimal site grading work is proposed for the western half of the site, which is relatively level at this time. The eastern portion of the site will require considerable grading, with up to 30 feet of cut in the extreme northeast corner of • the site. This earth mound is currently void of vegetation within the boundary limits of proposed parking and building construction. however, immediately north of this developed area is a significant stand of white oak vegetation. There is a considerable amount of grading work proposed within this area. The proponent should provide Staff with a tree inventory within proposed grading limits, which identifies the type and size of trees to be removed. Utilities Sewer and water service can be provided to this site by an extension of water and sanitary sewer lines within existing Viking Drive to the east of this site. Landscaping A landscape plan has been submitted, which identifies the type and size of materials to be planted. Although the size of materials is adequate, Staff feels that the landscape plan does not provide for enough plantings and berming along Viking Drive and Golden Triangle Drive to effectively screen parking areas. Staff recommends that the landscape plan be modified with additional berm height and plantings to provide for effective screening. The proponent should also provide sight sections at appropriate spacings along Viking Drive and Golden Triangle Drive to show the effectiveness of the screen. In addition, it appears that a number of plantings are IL located immediately adjacent to the intersection of the access drives and Viking Drive. These can become a sight distance problem. The proponent should provide sight lines from all driveway access points to verify that proper sight distance can be maintained based upon the volume capacity and design speed of Viking Drive. Parking The proponent envisions that the primary tenants will come from industries related to electronics, computers, medical technology, and telecommunications, with space finished out between 50 to 75 percent office, with remaining space devoted to storage, service, or light assembly. The proponent is providing parking at a ratio of 3.93 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, or 408 spaces. The proponent is also seeking a variance to permit office occupancy up to 100 percent of the building area within the I-2 Park Zoning District. Code would require the provision of a total of 402 parking spaces based upon 77,888 square feet of office area at five spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area and 25,962 feet of storage area at a ratio of one-half parking space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Therefore, it will not be possible to occupy the buildings at 100% office without adding parking. Lighting Site lighting has not been designed or identified at this time. Site lighting should be similar in concept throughout the Vantage Planned Unit Development along Viking Drive. Signage details and an overall site lighting plan should be submitted for Staff review. (V)1' • Southwest Crossing II 5 April 20, 1984 • lignage Signage for the tech buildings will be on the entry gate similar to that proposed by the image sketch. Tenant signage on the showroom buildings will occur on the facia above each entry. The proponent should provide signage details for Staff review. Pedestrian Systems There should be provision for a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the north side of Viking Drive, with appropriate access points to proposed recreational trails along Smetana Lake and Nine Nile Creek. Traffic Impacts The proponent intends to construct Viking Drive from its present terminus near the Viking Training facility to Prairie Center Drive. The volume capacity of Viking Drive, as a four-lane road, is 23,000 ADT. The office/tech/showroom buildings are expected to generate approximately 1,250 ADT, and the office proposal on the western edge of the site will generate approximately 3,D00 ADT. Vantage's overall master plan is expected to generate approximately 15,000 ADT. Staff anticipates that the majority of this traffic would utilize Prairie Center Drive for access to east-bound I-494, north-bound 1-494, and Highway #169. Traffic impact on the intersection of Viking Drive and Prairie Center Drive is anticipated to be significant and will necessitate improvements relative to left turn and right turn lanes. There may also ')e a need for a right turn lane along north-bound Prairie Center Drive to Viking Drive. While the immediate traffic impacts from Vantage's first two proposals can be accommodated within the currently planned road system, the combined and ultimate development of the Vantage site and the 84-acre Hoyt site to the north of this area will require additional road.improvements. A 1983 study prepared by the City's consultant traffic engineers identified additional road improvements such as a north-south collector between Viking Drive and Valley View Road (Golden Triangle), extension of W. 74th and W. 76th Streets between Washington Avenue, as well as a bridge over I-494 from Washington Avenue, to permit east-bound access to I-494 from the western edge of this area. Traffic impacts described in that study were based upon land uses envisioned at that time, which identified, primarily, offices along I-494 and industrial land use, with minimal office space for the 84-acre Hoyt property. Current proposals by Vantage and Hoyt have a greater percentage of office than was envisioned in the original study and traffic impacts are expected to be higher. A study will soon be underway by the City's consultant engineer (BRW) to determine the effects of land use on the existing road system and to recommend alternative solutions to accommodate the potential traffic volumes. Initial conversations with the City's traffic consultant indicate that the capacity of Viking Drive should be adequate enough to acconrnodate uliimate development of property owned by Vantage and Hoyt. Ultimate development is expected to impact significantly the intersection of Viking Drive and Prairie Center Drive, Valley View Road and County Road r18, Highway . #169 and Valley View Road, and Shady Oak Road and Highway #169. The proponent will be required to participate in a share of costs incurred for the preparation of the study. 0?)1 Southwest Crossing II 6 April 20, 1984 ECOMMENDATIDNS: Staff would recommend approval of the request for Comprehensive Guide Plan change from Office to Industrial, Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment, Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 Park for 11.33 acres, and Preliminary Plat for one lot on 11.33 acres, with variances, subject to the following: A. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: 1. Modify the site plan to provide for a 35 ft. front yard setback along Viking Drive and a 30 ft. setback along proposed Golden Triangle Drive. 2. Modify the landscape plan to provide for a berm of four feet in height at a 3-1 slope and supplement the berm with additional plantings. 3. Identify the color of brick and mechanical screening elements. B. Prior to final plat, proponent shall: 1. Provide slope stabilization, sewer, water, and drainage plans for review by the City Engineer. • , 2. Receive approval from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for grading, drainage, and slope stabilization plans. C. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall: 1. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee. 2. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours prior to grading or tree removal on the property. 3. Provide lighting and signage details for review. . 4. Provide plans for review by the fire Marshall. D. Participate in costs for the preparation of the traffic study analyzing potential traffic impacts of the Vantage and Hoyt projects. • • o32 C O 4 O 5 Z. ..r. a o 7, 1 c. i 1 ' rev., u! sfirn U a (KOler I --1 , x '7 Q. & , Z g , . 103 • Planning Comnission Minutes 5 April 23, 1984 ir • • • C. SOUTHWEST CROSSING PHASE II, by Vantage Companies. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Industrial, Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment, and Planned Unit Developnr.nt District Review for 36.89 acres; Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 Park for 11.3 acres; and Preliminary Plat for one lot on 11.3 acres. Location: West of Washington Avenue, north of I-494. A public hearing. Mr. Ray Gcarhardt, Vantage Properties, Inc., showed slides of projects that would he similar to that proposed for the Southwest Crossing Phase II. He reviewed the overall concept plan for the property, including vegetation, orientation of roads and buildings, adjacent uses, etc. Planning Commission Minutes 6 April 23. 1984 t Mr. Gearhardt stated that it was conrnon for showroom and tech services to be located close to office uses as these buildings would often contain services for office uses. In combination with their recently approved 247,000 square foot office building to the west, this site, and future office sites planned within the overall Planned Unit Development, would provide a well-balanced development for this area of the community. Mr. Sandy Ritter, RSP Architects, reviewed the building elevations, building materials, and other site features. He explained how roof top mechanical equipment would be screened and also reviewed the signage plan for the project. Chairman Dearman asked if alternatives had been considered for alternate locations of the buildings to the east in order to preserve more of the hill and the trees in this vicinity, as opposed to requesting variances from the required setbacks. Mr. Ritter stated that they had considered alternatives, but had decided that the request for variances, in combination with the restoration of the hill, would be the most preferable alternative. Mr. Gearhardt stated that the slope created by institution of the required setbacks would be more severe, and, therefore, less preferable in their opinion. Mr. Gearhardt stated that the floor area ratio for this portion of the property would be 0.21. He also stated that, in lieu of a sidewalk located along Viking Drive, it would be Vantage's preference to locate a bituminous pathway along Smetana Lake adjacent to the south shoreline, which would meander through the woodlands of.•Viking Drive. He also stated that they would schedule this project to begin concurrent with the office building construction. Mr. Raleigh Newsam, Vantage Properties, Inc., .stated that final details of the concept plan were dependent upon the traffic study for the area, which would include the routing and capacities for future Golden Triangle Road, the north/south collector for this property. Planner Enger reviewed findings and recommendations of the Staff report of April 20, 1984. He discussed the traffic situation for this entire area, which would affect the property to the north as well. Planner Enger stated that he contemplated no difficulties will the trail relocation proposed by proponent, however, the final decision would be left to the review of the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission, and the City Council. Torjeson stated that he could see a potential need for additional bridges to provide proper access to this site. He stated that he had voted against the original traffic study for this area as he did not feel it addressed the problems inherent with the access requirements for this property. <I� j Planning Corrnission Minutes 7 April 23, 1984 • Torjeson asked if the intensity of the land use proposals for this area was in balance with that area to the west within this Planned Unit Development. He also asked whether it balanced with that land use proposed on the south side of I-494. Staff reviewed the proposed land uses within the property of both sides of 1-494, stating that, in their opinion the Vantage project along the north side of 1-494 balanced as to land use within its own boundaries, and also that the two sides of the freeway would indeed balance as to land use. Torjeson asked what final floor area ratio would be. Planner Enger responded that the overall floor area ratio for this site would be under the maximum allowed for this property. Torjeson stated concern that the implicit approval of this overall concept be in compliance with the overall plans the City had for the Major Center Area. Staff responded that in their opinion, this was a project in full compliance with the goals of the Major Center Area. Torjeson asked why the proponents were not asking for Planned Unit Development approval over the entire property. Staff responded that the results of the traffic study for this area may have an impact on the final uses, and location of those uses, in the very near future. Therefore, proponents were requesting Planned Unit Development District Review only over a portion of the property. Schack asked if there would be an opportunity with this proposal to link the trail system from as far north as Lee Data, through Wilson •• Ridge, to this property. Hallett stated that he agreed with the need for this type of trail system. Planner Enger responded that this would be referred to a Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission for review. Staff added that this was •a matter which could be accomplished more easily at this time than it would be after the properties were developed. Chairman Beaman asked what had been determined as to a creek crossing of Nine Mile Creek by Golden Triangle Road with respect to the Watershed authority. Staff responded that the Watershed District had just begun their review of this project, and that at this point in time they could foresee no difficulty with a creek crossing. Mr. Herliev Ilelle, 6138 Arctic Way, asked if an alignment had been decided for Golden Triangle Road going north and eventually connecting into his property. Staff responded that this would be determined by the traffic study for this area involving Golden Triangle Road and access and traffic circulation for this entire area: MOTION 1: • ` Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Johannes, to close the public hearing. Motion carried--7-D-0 Planning Commission Minutes 8 April 23, 1984 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Schuck, to recommend to the City Council, approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan change from Office to Industrial, and Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment, and Planned Unit Development District Review for 36.89 • acres for Southwest Crossing Phase II by Vantage Properties, Inc., based on written materials dated March 5, 1984, and plans dated March 20, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 2D, 1984, and adding the following: That proponent's proposed location for the trail, along the south side of Smetana Lake, as opposed to along Viking Drive, be approved. Motion carried--7-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Schuck, to recommend to the City Council, approval of the Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 Park for 11.3 acres for Southwest Crossing Phase II by Vantage Properties, Inc., based on written materials dated March 5, 1984, and plans dated March 20, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 20, 1984, adding the following: That proponent's proposed location for the trail, along the south side of Smetana Lake, as opposed to along Viking Drive, be approved. • Motion carried--7-0-0 MOTION 4: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Schuck, to recommend to the City Council, approval of the Preliminary Plat of Southwest Crossing Phase II by Vantage Properties, Inc., based on written materials dated March 5, 1984, and plans dated March 20, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff report dated April 20, 1984, adding the • following: That proponent's proposed location for the trail, along the south side of Smetana Lake, as opposed to along Viking Drive, be approved. Motion carried--7-0-0 it • CUT Off iCCS/liti`,U itUI fafJGI(.ROAD/(CLN PfiAIBIF•MN 55344$.45U/lC[E1'GUta:(WI U31 2N? t 1 M1 i =,i Ir April 24, 1984 Mr. Ralicgh Amrsam, II Vantage Companies 2777 Steurno,is Freeway Dallas, Texas 75207 Dear Mr. Neesam: At its m;ueting last evening, the Planning Commission acted to recommend to the City Council approval of your project, Southwest Crossing, subject to the reconmendations of the Staff Report dated April 20, 1984. Prior to review by the Council, you should revise the development plans to reflect the changes listed below: 1. Modify the site plan to provide for a 35 ft. front yard setback along Viking Drive and a 30 ft. setback along proposed Golden Triangle Road, or a 25 ft. setback along proposed Golden Triangle Read, with sight lines showing effectiveness of the screening of the parking areas from the public road. 2. Modify the landscape plan to provide for a berm of four feet in height at a 3-1 slope and supplement the berm with additional plantings along all road frontages. 3. Identify the color of brick and screening elements. Also provide sight sections showing the effectiveness of screening of the rooftop mechanical equipment. (While examples were shown at the Commission meeting, they will again need to be identified at the Council level. Perhaps coded brick colors or styles from the manufacturer could be provided in written form. This would also be true for the screening materials for the rooftop mechanical equipment.) Your item will be scheduled for hearing before the City Council on Tuesday, June 5, 1984. Please provide us with twelve (12) copies of the revised information no later than May 29, 1984, so that we may have time to review the changes and include the revised information in the agenda packets for the City Council. Other matters you may wish to consider at this time include the following: 1. Scheduling the project for review by the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. • Mr. Newsam -2- April 24, 1984 2. Scheduling the project for review by the Watershed District. 3. Submit utility plans to the City Engineering Department for review. The City will be in contact with you regarding the traffic study for your property, as well as the property to the north being developed by Hoyt Development. Please contact our office, if you have any further questions. • Sincerely, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE� A Michael D. Franzen �/ • Senior Planner kk • 1tjjt • • • • • • � t . i 4 MEMORANDUM • TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Mayor and City Council • THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community ServicesTV-- DATE: May 3, 1984 SUBJECT: Supplementary Staff Report to the Planning Staff Report on Southwest Crossing Phase II The Planning Staff Report gives a fairly detailed summary of the existing site character, the grading and drainage plan, and landscape requirements. The Planning Staff Report recommended 5' concrete sidewalks along the north side of Viking Drive with appropriate access points to the proposed recreational trails along Smetana Lake and Nine-Mile Creek, and referred to a sidewalk that should be constructed within the road right-of-way along the west side of Golden Tri- angle Drive. The Community Services staff note that the April 20th Planning Staff Report provided the following information regarding shoreland management: "This 36 acre site lies adjacent to Nine-Mile Creek. Since land adjacent to Nine-Mile Creek At was dedicated as an outlot to the City for public purposes, the 36 acre Vantage 11... project is not an abutting lot and restrictions relative to height, extent of hard surface allowable, and lot sizes, do not apply. There is an existing floodplain area on this site, which lies at an elevation of 840 along the northern portion of the site adjacent to Nine-Mile Creek." The Community Services staff would disagree that the outlot dedicated south of Nine-Mile Creek is usable for public purposes, and, in fact, will be under sev- eral feet of water once Golden Triangle Road is constructed: therefore, the lots abutting Nine-Mile Creek should comply to the Shoreland Management Ordinance. • The single most significant natural feature on this site is the wooded hill just west of Golden Triangle Road. This hill was originally sighted as a preservation area, however, in the platting process several years ago the restricted area was limited to a line drawn through the top of the hill preserving the northern half of the hill. The hill is located within outlet C. Outlet G is noted as future office or industrial. Outlot B is proposed as future office or industrial; however,with the Shoreland Man- agement Ordinance setback, development of Outlot B would be very difficult. PEDESTRIAN SYSTEMS With the construction of Golden Triangle Road and the ultimate increase in the level of Smetana Lake, the lake will become a much different type of lake than the existing conditions represent. The Community Services staff feel that a public pedestrian trail system below the slope, near the edge of the future high water mark, but above the 840 contour would provide a pedestriau/bike pathway that would be heavily used by employees working in the area north of Viking Drive and south of Valley View Road, as well as the public. The Community Services staff recommend that the developer construct an S' asphalt pathway from Golden Triangle Road, along the south side of Nine-Mile Creek, above the 840 controur, westerly 3 -2- around Smetana Lake to connect with the future 8' hikeway/bikeway along Valley View Road. The Community Services staff also recommend a 5' concrete sidewalk on the north side of Viking Drive and on the west side of Golden Triangle Road. If, and when, Smetana Lane is ever improved and extended to Golden Triangle Road, the Community Services staff would recommend an 8' asphalt bikeway along the south side of Smetana Lane. The pedestrian connection from Smetana Lake to Bryant Lake would follow a 8' asphalt trail around Smetana Lake to Valley View Road, north along the cast side of Valley View Road to the Braun property just cast of Nine-Mile Creek, then north and west .through Outlot B of the Wilson Ridge project, then north through Lee Data along the sidewalk along Flying Cloud Drive to Shady Oak Road. The Community Services staff recommend approval of Southwest Crossing Phase II as per the Planning Staff Report dated April 20, 1984 with the correction regarding the Shoreland Management Ordinance and requiring the developer to construct the 8' asphalt trails prior to the issuance of the final building permit submitted within this plat. The cash park foes are applicable to this proposal. • BL:md • �_. �0ti UNAPPROVED MINUTES It EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION, AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Monday, May 7, 1984 7:30 p.m., School Administration Building COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Marty Jessen, chairperson (late); Raiford —"— --- —� Baker, Moe Cook, Gary Gonyea, Jerry Kingrey, Jesse Schwartz COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: Pat Breitenstein COMMISSION STAFF: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services OTHERS PRESENT: Charles Pappas, Community Center Manager; Sandra Werts, Recreation Supervisor I. ROLL CALL The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Jerry Kingrey for chairperson Marty Jessen. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Kingrey added Item VIII, Misc. Other Business. MOTION: Schwartz moved to approve the agenda as amended. Cook seconded the motion and it was carried. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF APRIL 16, I984 MOTION: Jessen moved to approve the minutes as published. Cook seconded the motion and it vas carried. Baker abstained. IV. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS None V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Reports of Commissioners None B. Reports of Staff 1. Development Proposals --> a. Southwest Crossing Phase II Refer to memo dated May-3, 1984 from Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services and Staff Report dated April 20, 1984 from Michael Franzen, Senior Planner. tt i. Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission May 7, 1984 . - 2 - Sandy Ritter and John Kumla were present for the proponent. They gave a brief overview of the proposed project by the • Vantage Corporation. Vantage proposes two basic projects for 65 acres of land north of 494. The Commission recently reviewed their request to construct a 247,000 sq. ft. office building on the western edge of the site near Prairie Center Drive and Smetana Lake. Ritter and Kumla reviewed Vantage's immediate site plan which involves the construction of five buildings containing about 110,000 sq. ft. of space. These buildings would be one story structures for one or two tenants each and would be constructed parallel to the proposed Viking Drive. The level area of the western half of this site has been cleared of vegetation and will be the primary area of development. The • northern area which has a large amount of mature vegetation will be a preservation area. The Commission recommended that a trail system be developed for both pedestrian and bicycle traffic. The proposed trails would• be located along Smetana Lake andNine-Mile Creek accessing from a sidewalk along the north side of Viking Drive. The Commission feels that the pathway would be used by both employees working in this area and also by the public. The grading plan for the proposed construction area was presented with tree lines shown on the site plan. Landscape plans were discussed. The Commission feels that more planting and bermings should be added along Golden Triangle Drive and Viking Drive to effectively screen parking areas. Lambert showed a composite mar of the entire area and pointed out the overall trail system which is proposed. The map also shows existing city owned property and proposed privately or publicly owned preservation areas. He stated the plan to raise the level of Smetana Lake by four feet and the importance of developing a pedestrian system in these areas. MOTION: Jessen moved to recommend to the Council that necessary .conveyances or other means are provided for the raising of water in Smetana Lake, that trails will be built along the raised creek at the developer's expense eliminating a sidewalk. Jessen also commented that the severe grading and tree removal are recognized, but that the fate of the land was determined with the construction of the freeway. Schwartz seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. io 43 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ir • RESOLUTION #84-107 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARYC PLAAT TUOF EDEN PRAIRIE TECHNOLOGY PARK FOR HOBE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Eden Prairie Technology Park for Hoyt Construction dated March 15, 1984, of 18.2 acres into one industrial lot, one outlot, and road right-of-way, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of , 1984. • yy Wolfgang H. Fenzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • • • t0gL-1 • STAFF REPORT C TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning • DATE: April 20, 1984 PROJECT: Eden Prairie Technology Park APPLICANT: Brad Hoyt FEE OWNER: William Pierson REQUEST: Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 Park for 12.5 acres and Preliminary Plat of 18.2 acres into one industrial lot, one outlot, and road right-of-way Background 1:r"'�°.,�+ _.PiIl The Comprehensive Guide Plan identi- 1 `� Y I if fies an industrial land use for this 12-� a` site, Surrounding land uses are 'EG C ,;; i 2 P!€ �I� primarily industrial to the north and east of the site, with Public j ��- v,Ew 1-8 I_v `.N Open Space and High Density p - O1- .. 0.; ' Residential/Industrial uses desig- i PROPOSED SITE --, '` . • N L ;. 8U-:4 .,, . I nated to the south and west, of the -�} i 2 r�—i _� � site. Immediately south of this t /�- ' 1 r; "-- i site, across Nine Mile Creek, is the r f 1' ti • h N Southwest Crossing II office/indus- / trial park proposal by Vantage ,, , ti Corporation. /`` ^ . cc I This site is part of an 84-acre •� . ��-;V general development plan for office l '" 4 ° and industrial uses envisioned by �. the proponent. The conceptual plan \ `'� . is submitted to show the relation- ('�ti'.;'E,t a., ship between the specific site , �. r. request and future roads and land w r," ,-..,,,w/; i, uses. The specific request of the i proponent is for a preliminary plat ' -.""'-:-.&, -< ,,� of 18.2 acres into one lot (12.5 .,, i • I �'' 1- acres) and an outlot (4.37 acres); .•,, ro-t N ,- and a rezoning for the 12.5-acre , 80-93ids! lot from Rural to I-2 Park to accommodate two 81,530 sq. ft. «--4_ AREA LOCAMN MAP Hoyt Staff Report 2 April 20, 1984 , office/warehouse buildings. Existing Site Character The 84-acre site is characterized by extreme grade changes, marked by an oak-wooded knoll, rising to an elevation of 932 in the southeast corner of the site. There are some steep slopes in the northwest central portion of the site, covered by a variety of hardwood trees, with oak being the predominant species. There are considerable lowland and flood plain areas on the site, primarily along the western and southern portions. Nine Mile Creek flows through this flood plain area. The central and eastern portion of the site, is relatively level resulting from extensive gravel mining operations. The office warehouse buildings will be constructed in this area. There is a variety of soils and slope conditions. The flood plain areas are characterized by organic soils, with a high water table. The north central and eastern portions of the site are characterized by mixed gravel, sand, and clay deposits, with considerable top soil, which has been removed through mining operations. The steeply sloped portions of the property are characterized by Hayden Loam and Clay Loam soils. The steepest slopes, in excess of 18%, are found on the oak-wooded knoll in the southeast corner of the site. Slopes of 12-18% are found along the western toe of this hill and along the flood plain areas in the northwest corner of the site. The balance of the site in the central and eastern portions are flat to gently rolling, with slopes ranging from 0-12%. IL .The existing vegetation map indicates three distinct woodland tracts; mature hardwoods, with oak as the dominant species, lowland vegetation along the Nine Mile Creek and flood plain areas, and a large open space with little, or no vegetative cover within the gravel mining area of the central portion of the site. Overall Development Plan The proponent has submitted two conceptual alternatives identifying potential land uses and proposed road locations for the 84-acre site. A major issue is the extension of proposed Golden Triangle Drive from Viking Drive to Valley View Road. There are three alternative road alignments for the extension of Golden Triangle Drive in the southeast corner of the site near the wooded oak knoll. Alternative #1 proposes an alignment west of the knoll, Alternative #2 proposes crossing the knoll, and Alternative #3 proposes an alignment east of the knoll. Each of these particular alignments have their advantages and disadvantages for development for the balance of the property. Alternative #1 would have the least amount of impact on the site and would preserve the greatest extent of the oak-wooded knoll. The overall development plan identifies proposed W. 76th Street extension from Washington Avenue to proposed Golden Triangle Drive. The center line of proposed W. 76th Street is between parcels owned by Pierson and Charles McCartney. The proponent expects to obtain Mr. McCartney's agreement to dedicate right-of-way necessary to extend W. 76th Street as shown on the preliminary plat. Land uses proposed on the overall development plan arc a mixture of office and 11 office/showroom sites. The office sites are identified in areas to take advantage of the existing wooded knoll and also views across open space preservation areas around Nine Mile Creek. Office/showroom uses are proposed for the relatively level areas of the site, with minimal existing vegetation. • i E' Hoyt Staff Report 3 April 20, 1984 • • The ultimate land uses proposed for this site, together with ultimate land uses planned for the Vantage proposal, south of Nine Mile Creek, will generate traffic volumes, which will signficantly impact the existing road systems within the area. A study will soon be underway by the City's consulting traffic engineer to determine the effects of land use on the existing road system and to recommend alternative solutions to accommodate potential traffic volumes. Staff suggests that the proponent participate in a proportionate share of costs incurred for the preparation of the study with Vantage and the City. Site Plan Two 81,530 sq. ft., one-story office/warehouse buildings are proposed to be constructed on this site. The buildings are constructed in a letter "C" configuration, with office and parking areas around the perimeter of the building • and with loading facilities internalized and screened from public view. The site plan is in compliance with building and parking setbacks, floor area ratios, building height, and parking requirements of the I-2 Park zoning district. Total parking requirements for 163,060 sq. ft. of office/warehouse building would require provision for 449 spaces, plus nine handicapped spaces. The proponent is providing 503 spaces and twelve handicapped spaces. Landscape Plan The proponent has submitted a landscape plan, which depicts the variety, number, and location of plant materials on the site. Material size proposed is generous, with shade trees averaging between 3-1/2 to 4 inches in diameter, coniferous trees between eight and ten feet in height, and flowering trees with a 2-1/2 inch diameter minimum. Staff recommends that the proponent provide sight sections from W. 76th Street to document the effectiveness of proposed screening. Utilities Sewer and water service is proposed to be provided for Lots 1 and 2 by extension of existing utilities from W. 74th Street between two lots in the Norseman Industrial Park 5th Addition, north of the proposed subdivision. Storm water run-off will sheet drain across parking areas into catch basins within the parking lot and proposed W. 76th Street. Water will flow through a series of storm sewer pipes in a westerly direction to an interim ponding area to the southwest of Outlot A. Grading • The preliminary grading plan indicates a minimal amount of cut and fill proposed on site. However there will be some areas of significant cut and regrading within and to the south of proposed W. 76th Street and the southeast corner of the site. liApproximately 30 feet of cut will be required. The regraded areas south of W. 76th Street will have a slope of approximately 3-1. There are some significant oak trees near this grading area and the proponent should provide tree inventory within the regraded areas indicating specific tree types, size and quantity to be removed. Existing slopes north of the project within the Norseman 5th Industrial Park will 101 Hoyt Staff Report 4 April 20, 1984 • { also be modified with slopes up to 3-1. Grading plans of the proponent indicate provisions for slope stabilization within all areas disturbed by grading. Lighting The proponent intends to light the exterior parking areas with high pressure sodium Sterner "Executive," or similar light, on a 16 ft. square steel pole. Luminars and poles will have a dark brown painted finish. Staff recommends that the proponent provide an overall lighting plan and details of proposed lighting for review. Signage Proponent has provided a signage plan, which indicates two building signs and one project sign along proposed W. 76th Street. Tenant signage will be located at entry areas, and attached to the entry vestibules. The proponent should provide signage details for Staff review. Architecture Two one-story 81,530 sq. ft. office/warehouse buildings are proposed to be constructed on the site. The exterior walls facing the perimeter of the site will be constructed of three primary materials. An antique bronze, (medium gray) smooth textured, decorative metal panel will encompass the top half of the exterior IL elevation above the windows. Areas below the windows and at the entryways to each of the individual offices will be a white, smooth-textured, stucco. A dark bronze aluminum frame will surround a thermal break insulated glass. The ground will be bermed up to window height over portions of the building. Windows will be recessed .approximately two feet and the building exterior is extended approximately four feet at the entryways. Since the proponent intends to develop 84 acres as a planned industrial park, there should be an overall development framework manual, which provides for common site planning, architecture, landscaping, screening, pedestrian systems, lighting, and signage. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff would recommend approval of the request for Preliminary Plat to subdivide 18.2 acres into one lot and one outlot and rezoning from Rural to I-2 Park subject to the 1. following: A. Prior to Council review, the proponent shall: 1. Provide site section at appropriate intervals across the berm and planting areas adjacent to W. 76th Street to document the effectiveness of screening of parking areas. i1 11 B. Prior to Final Plat, proponent shall: 1. Provide slope stabilization, sewer, water, and drainage plans for review by the City Engineer. Hoyt Staff Report 5 April 20, 1984 2. Commit to the construction of necessary road, sewer, water, and storm drainage improvements from existing W. 76th Street to the western property line of Lot 1. 3. Obtain additional right-of-way for W. 76th Street and dedicate the right-of-way to the City. C. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall: 1. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee. 2. Receive approval from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for grading, drainage, and slope stabilization plans. 3. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours prior to grading or tree removal on the property. 4. Provide lighting and signage details before review. 5. Provide a detailed landscape plan indicating size, type, quantity and method of installation of all materials for review. 6. Provide plans for review by the Fire Marshall. D. Prior to any future rezoning or platting of the balance of the property, !( proponent shall provide a Design Framework Manual outlining provisions for ;. common site planning, architecture, landscaping, screening, walkways, lighting, and signage for review. E. Concurrent with future rezoning or platting of the balance of the property, proponent shall dedicate the appropriate right-of-way for the extension of Golden Triangle Drive. F. Proponent shall participate in a proportionate share of costs incurred for the preparation of a traffic study with the City and Vantage Properties. • • 10 4') • Planning Commission Minutes 8 April 23, 1984 4( • • • • • • • • • • • .. D. EDEN PRAIRIE TECHNOLOGY PARK, by Hoyt Construction. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 Park for 12.0 r acres, and Preliminary Plat of 18.2 acres into one industrial lot, one outlot, and road right-of-way. Location: W. 76th Street, west of Washington Avenue. A . public hearing. Mr. Peter Jarvis, BRW, consultants for proponent, reviewed the site characteristics, surrounding land uses, proposed uses, soils, slopes, and utilities available and proposed for the site. He stated that it was proponent's opinion that the preferrable route for proposed Golden Triangle Drive would be through the center of the hill, that the hill was not a significant feature of the site as I0' 00 I. • • Planning Commission Minutes 9 April 23, 1984 it might be for other developments, due to the mining operations which had taken place on the property in past years. Planner Franzen reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report of April 20, 1984. •Torjeson asked which of the three proposed alternative alignments for Golden Triangle Drive through this property was preferred by the Staff. Staff stated that the westerly alignment was preferable, in that' it required the least amount of removal of the hill from this site. Staff added that this would be a decision finalized with traffic study information to be completed for the Vantage site to the south and this property. • Hallett asked if there would be an extension of Smetana Lane included in this site. Staff responded that it would probably be necessary, and desirable, and that this, too, be considered in the traffic study for this property. Mr. Jarvis stated that proponents agreed that a connection to Smetana Lane would be a positive feature providing access and • traffic circulation within this property. He added that he . felt more than just the two property owners, Vantage and themselves, would be benefitting from this traffic study. Mr. Herliev Helle, 6138 Arctic Way, owner of the property north of this project, asked if the twelve acres to be rezoned with this • initial phase of this project would abut the north/south collector and therefore require its completion at this time. Staff responded that the north/south collector was west of the twelve acres being requested to be rezoned and that development of the remainder of the property would be dependent on the location determined for the north/south collector. Mr. Helle expressed concern that the north/south collector align with his proposed road running north and south within Norseman 6th ' Addition abutting this project on the north. Mr. Jarvis responded that currently the north/south collectors were shown at an off-set of five to ten feet between the Eden Prairie Technology Park proposal and the Norseman 6th Addition project. However, he stated that this would be easily mitigated at a time the final alignment was determined by the traffic study. He added that it was their full intention to align these roads to connect properly at the north boundary as well as the south boundary with the Vantage proposal. • Mr. Hello asked about the matching of grades at the shared boundary at his property and the Eden Prairie Technology Park property to the south. Due to mining activities on either side of this boundary, a ridge had been created, which had caused severe grade differences between the two properties. He stated that he felt it would he in the best interest of both the Eden Prairie Technology Park owners and himself to match the grades at this site, not only for the road, but for the full distance of the boundaries shared between the two properties. IuSI • Planning Commission Minutes 10 April 23, 1984 Mr. William Pierson, owner of the property proposed to be Eden Prairie Technology Park, stated that he, too, fully intended to match these grades at time of development. He stated that he would be willing to work this out with the owner of the property to the north. Chairman Beaman suggested that the two owners meet to Coordinate the grading matter, and that they report back to the City as to their final decision. Mr. Bruce Hoyt, Hoyt Development, stated that he would like the City to consider the alignment of Golden Triangle Road through the center of the hill. He stated that, due to the mining operations on the site, the hill had become a rather unnatural looking feature for the • property. Mr. Hoyt stated that in his opinion, removal of this hill would not be a great detriment to the site, nor to the City. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Schuck, seconded by Gartner, to close the public hearing. Motion carried--7-O-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Torjesen, seconded by Gartner, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Hoyt Construction for zoning district change from Rural to I-2 Park for 12.0 acres, based on written materials and plans dated March 12, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 20, 1984, with the adding the following: that the trail system through this property north to Wilson Ridge and Lee Data and south through the Vantage proposal be continuous through this property. Motion carried--7-O-0- MOTION 3: Motion was made by Torjesen, seconded by Gartner, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Hoyt Construction for Preliminary Plat of 18.2 acres into one lot and one outlot, based on written materials and plans dated March 12, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 20, 1984, adding the following: that the trail system through this property north to Wilson Ridge and Lee Data and south through the Vantage proposal, be continuous through this property. Motion carried--7-0-0 It -PD CITY OFFICES/0950 EOEN PRAIRIE 110AD/I.0111 PRAIRIE.PAN 55344 2499/TEIkIIIOPIE(6121 9374282 April 24, 1984 Mr. Brad A. Hoyt Hoyt Development 8300 Grand Avenue South MInneapolis, Minnesota 55420 • Dear Mr. Hoyt: At its meeting last evening, the Planning Commission acted to recommend to the City Council approval of your project, Eden Prairie Technology Park, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 20, 1984. Prior to review by the Council, you should amend your submission to provide site sections at appropriate • intervals across the berm and planting areas adjacent to W. 76th Street to document the effectiveness of screening of parking areas. Your item will be scheduled for hearing before the City Council on Tuesday, June 5, 1984. Please provide us with twelve (12) copies of the revised plans no later than May 29, 1984, so that we may have time to review the change and include the revised plans in the agenda packets for the City Council. i( Other matters you may wish to consider at this time include the following: 1. Scheduling the project for review by the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. 2. Scheduling the project for review by the Watershed District. 3. Submit utility plans to the City Engineering Department for review. 4. Coordination with the property owner to tiie north regarding the final grades along your shared property line and for the north-south collector street. • • The City will be in contact with you regarding the traffic study to be prepared for this property and the property to the south being developed by Vantage Properties, Inc. If you have any questions on these matters, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE "IVC/CiadDhOS(77'1 IP Michael D. Franzen Senior Planner kk Ia` J 4 I MEMORANDUM • TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services Q'*/ DATE: May 3, 1984 SUBJECT: Supplementary Staff Report to April 20, 1984 Planning Staff Report on Eden Prairie Technology Park The Planning Staff requested that Hoyt Development provide a general development 1. plan for the entire 84 acre site. This plan is included in the packet information; however, the request is simply for a zoning district change from Rural to I-2 Park for 12.5 acres and preliminary plat of 18.2 acres in the northeast portion of the 84 acre site. The Community Services staff feel it is appropriate early on in the process to comment on the general development plan. The Community Services staff concur with the Planning Staff recommendation that alternative number one proposing a road alignment west of the wooded knoll on the southern portion of the site would have the least amount of impact on the site, and would preserve the greatest extent of the oak wooded knoll. IL Review of the overall development plan for Hoyt Development is timely in that the Commission is also reviewing the Southwest Crossing proposal on the south side of Nine-Mile Creek. The Community Services staff will have a composite map showing proposals from Lee Data south to the Wilson Ridge area, the Hoyt Development area, and the Southwest Crossing area so the Commission and Council can see the overall trail system pro- posed to serve this quadrant of the City. This composite map also shows existing City owned property and proposed privately owned or publicly owned preservation 1 areas. The Community Services staff recommend approval of Eden Prairie Technology Park as per the April 20, 1984 Planning Staff Report. BL:md i I IUD�� • ti • Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission May 7, 1984 • - 3 - --- b. Eden Prairie Technology Park • Brad Hoyt and a representative of BRW were present for the proponent. They discussed plans for the development of a 12.5 acre site on 76th Street owned by Pierson Gravel Pit. Hoyt explained that office sites are proposed for the level areas of the site which contain little or no vegetation. The proposed construction for this area are two one-story 81,350 sq. ft. office buildings. These buildings would also have warehouse capabilities in the middle with no dock doors visible. The number of parking spaces provided would be more than the required amount. MOTION: Schwartz moved to recommend approval of the Eden Prairie Technology Park as per the Staff Report. Kingrey • seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. 2. Men's Volleyball Program Report 1983-84 This is an information item only. No action was taken. . 3. Council Report of April 17, 1984 and May 1, 1984 • • Lambert stated that at the April 17 meeting, there was no action taken on the watershed issue in the Purgatory Creek location. The Council was asked the following questions regarding this issue: Do you have any additional input? The answer was no. Did plan meet all criteria necessary for development? The answer was yes. At the May 1 meeting, Dick Anderson discussed the bridge on County Road 4 and the bicycle accident which occurred there recently. A letter will be written to the county requesting an upgrade of the bridge with a separate structure for bicycles and pedestrians. The Commission suggested that signs be erected on the bridge asking i. people to walk their bicycles across. The Council approved the Eden Prairie Horsemen's request to use airport property as a riding ring with the Club being responsible . for construction and maintenance. The Council also approved the construction of the Staring Lake Playstructure - Phase I. • O ) 1) • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #84-108 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REGISTERED LAND SURVEY OF BROCK RESIDENCE INN FOR EDEN PRAIRIE HOTEL COMPANY BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 91- That the Registered Land Survey of Brock Residence Inn for Eden Prairie Hotel Company, dated May 9, 1984, consisting of 9.0 acres for three commercial lots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and'Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of , 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: • 11' John D. Franc, City Clerk May 8, 1984 Mr. Chris Enger City of Eden Prairie Planning Department 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 • RE: Staff Comments Dated April 20, 1984 Brock Residence Inn • Grading and Drainage RCM Project No. 841005 Dear Chris: The Minnesota Department of Transportation is allowing us to use their existing drainage area as an outlet for our storm sewer and is doing 'CHso without requirement for an easement. They would prefer to have us upgrade the existing drainage basin and use it as is without the ease- ment. rleke In reference to the grading plan for the overall site, (the comment of carroll ter the northerly area being to low for development), we feel that this is aociates,inc. not the case. The area in question is planned to be drained either to architects the Highway 5 right-of-way or to the inplace storm sewer system in engineers landscape architects Highway 169. This has been discussed with the MnDOT staff and either land surveyors alternative is acceptable to them. It is our intention to tie-in to laboratory services the existing storm sewer system on the westerly right-of-way of Highway 169 from this area. The grading plan also shows a ground elevation of approximately 906 for this area, which is more than high enough to allow for connection to the existing water and sanitary sewer system, upon development of this particular parcel. Additionally, it was not our intent to dictate a final design for the balance of the site, but to provide a basis for future development with preliminary grading. The final grading will be based upon individual site plans for the developers. In reference to the puddling of water in the deadend parking areas, we feel we have provided significant numbers of catch basins that will be more than adequate to provide positive drainage from any deadend parking areas. With the new site plan, these areas have been reduced to only two. One of which has 12; drainage across it at present and the other has 2.5% tapering down to 0.5%. On our final drainage plan this can be adjusted to increase the drainage slope slightly. Both areas have adequate numbers of catch basins to provide positive drainage from the area. It is our feeling, based upon the new site plans, that all drainage from the site will be able to be handled in an adequate fashion and that no backup prob- lems should be encountered based upon the design calculations used on the preliminary plan. 1011 first strrr't snu!h post olhce box 130 hnpkins,re ss obi 553,13 612-935-6901 Mr. Chris Enger May 8, 1984 1rPage 2 If you should have any further questions, I would be more than glad to discuss them with you. Very truly yours, Duane D. Cramer RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATES, INC. DDC:jj qi • s • • • it . i • I • • STAFF REPORT • TO: Planning Commission FROM: 'Chris Enger, Director of Planning • DATE: May 11, 1984 PROJECT: Brock Residence Inn APPLICANT: Eden Prairie Hotel Company FEE OWNER: Hustad Development, Inc. LOCATION: Northwest quadrant of Highway #169 and I-494 REQUEST: Zoning District and Site Plan Amendment, with variances before the Board of Appeals, for 4.33 acres for a 128-unit hotel and Registered • Land Survey for 9.2 acres for two lots. Background 78.14 V . .. 7 1 . The Planning Commission last re- • IL Jft iewed this item at their April 23, 4 \, ...: • �,/r 1984, meeting and returned the Ix-• !??:. ,:.,r 5i • ',r' �t:, �.,.y ,n'/ proposal to the developer for . �,, 2 . • revisions according to the Staff r .N.0' � �i Report dated April 20, 1984. Since 1 �; .(kOr^,3". ` . , ,,e.-, th at time, the Staff has met with PROPOSED SITE ,. ( , the proponent on several occasions :-,,,., `,.N�,� \I and reviewed several alternative :\ , ,. .r / j plans, which were proposed in an •\i `� attempt to meet the requirements \\ �-` '7%w- �`— r- recommended in the Apr i 1 20, 1984, -- Ns, .s,''� Staff Report. The proponent and ,, , r '• PUB,.' Staff have finally reached an ( ;"" I, ... ,!r` 1-9 agreement on a plan, which is most '; •••fir\, 3 like the original plan submitted. `!,y The most recent plan included in „,,,.; t'' c . , your packet and dated May 9, 1984, Z i..._f has expanded the amount of land area �';--;11e'� '. from 3.85 acres proposed in April, �` 1-..: . "����� 1984, to the 4.33-acre area of ;t ..�i♦_r .�.��; zoning approved by the City in late ' t 'r.; r,5 , . December, 1933. This most recent 1. 1,... plan brings the proponent into ��" f r+;� 11 �'� � conformance with the City ordinance � — U 1'-' "'lJ ith regard to setbacks. The •2( f kg-i y _ L�': --:-" ,roponent has revised the plan to ..s(i 7 ;1f /'.,1'Z.-.--t-:: ,� '., include a 17.5 ft. setback to the --.+31.^._,.,,, .r j.;fi•• ,_-)'^� I � :AF A E...L.;v 4.•i.,b A.,:lArl MAP 1 06 Brock Residence Inn (Revised) 2 May. 11, 1984 parking area along the south and west portions of the site, along with a 20-ft. wide driving lane. The previous plan indicated a 13-ft. wide driving lane and a 10-ft. setback from that lane to the property line. The additional setback, as required by Ordinance, Will provide adequate area for snow storage and plant material, or berming, necessary to screen the parking from public roads. The 20-ft. wide lane would be according to Planning Staff and Fire Marshall recommendations to allow adequate maneuvering area during the winter months and provide for adequate access for emergency vehicles. Although Staff had originally suggested a minimum ten-foot setback from any building to the nearest hard-surfaced, or parking, area, proponent was unable to meet this criteria and has, instead, planned for the five-foot distance as a minimum as required by the Ordinance. In addition, Staff had suggested a minimum of 40 ft. between building clusters, and proponent has been unable to obtain this between two of the building clusters on the west side of the project. However, the 20-ft. minimum distances occur toward the inside of the project and these clusters on the west side of the project spread further apart because they are on a curve. The average distance between these building clusters is 30 ft. and the distance which may be visible from the western edge of the property by the public is 40 ft. The proponent should further mitigate the tightness of these building clusters by the placement of large trees in these areas to help delineate spaces between buildings. Evergreen trees of a size between 8-14 ft. in height and deciduous trees in a range between 3-6 caliper inches should be utilized between the building clusters. • The proponent has continued to provide a 17.5-ft. setback to the circulation lane along the Highway #169 frontage, which is in conformance with the Ordinance. Also, proponent has provided a 10-ft. setback from the hard-surface lanes on the north side of project and on the east side of the project to the interior lot lines of the lot which will occur to the northeast. At the writing of this report, the revised landscape plan had not been submitted. Screening of the parking areas will be required as a minimum and with the increased setback to the exterior lot lines, it will be possible to provide berming as a foundation for the plant material, which will augment the berm as a screening tool for the parking. Also, as mentioned above, it will be important to provide large- sized plant materials throughout the interior of the project to delineate the space between clusters and provide scale for the units. A final landscaping plan must be prepared for review and approval by the Planning Staff prior to building permit issuance according to these guidelines. The trash storage structure depicted in the northwest corner of the property must adhere to the accessory structure setbacks from the lot lines and must be of a brick to match the buildings. The balance of the Hustad land area is approximately 4.17 acres in size and could have the ability to provide three lots: one, directly northeast of the Brock project of approximately one acre; one, directly to the north of the Brock project of approximately 1.2 acres; and one, toward the very north point of the Hustad 11 property of approximately 1.75 acres. These three lots, together with the Brock property, would ha served via a private road, which would provide access to Highway #169. j 1)inn Brock Residence Inn (Revised) 3 May.11, 1984 RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the zoning and site plan amendment and Registered Land Survey of 9.2 acres into two lots for the Brock Residence Inn for a 128-unit hotel on 4.33 acres of property, subject to the following: 1. The Board of Appeals must review and approve the floor area ratio variance from 0.4 as a maximum allowable by Ordinance, to 0.43 as proposed on the 4.33 acres. 2. The landscape plan, must provide for screening of all loading and parking areas from public view and plant materials throughout the site which delineate the spaces between building clusters and provide plant material of a size in scale with the buildings. (Evergreen in a range of 8-14 ft. in height and deciduous trees in a range of 3-6 inches in caliper.) Berms along Highway #169 and I-494 must be constructed at least three feet in height and supplemented with plant material. No evergreen trees on the site should be less than six feet in height, and no overstory deciduous tres should be less than 2-1/2 inches in caliper. 3. Parking must be provided according to Ordinance. 4. Final engineering drawings would be reviewed by the City Engineering I Department as available. Sewer for the project is not directly adjacent to . the property and will need to be extended from the east. 5. Any accessory buildings, including trash storage structures, must meet accessory structure setbacks and be of a brick material to match the balance of the buildings. 6. Access to the property would he via a private road, which would provide access to the full intersection further north along Highway #169. 7. The trash receptacle structure in the northwest corner of the 1property shall adhere to the accessory structure setbacks from the lot lines and shall be of a brick to match the buildings. 8. Further development of the property owned by Hustad Oevelopment, Inc., would be subject to provision of a design framework manual, which would provide plans for common elements, such as an overall landscaping plan, common parking lot lighting fixtures, commonality of exterior material, and an overall signage plan. 9. Proponent shall pay the required Cash Park Fee. 10. Proponent shall obtain necessary permits from the Minnesota Highway Department of Transportation for construction within Highway t169 right-of- way. IL11. Signage shall comply with City Ordinance requirements. 12. Proponent shall submit a lighting plan, showing details of the lighting used, and an overall lighting plan, indicating location of all lighting for review by the Staff. Brock Residence Inn (Revised) 4 May 11, 1984 ir 13. Proponent shallsubmit erosion the controlsWatershed plansDistrict review and approvaingineer grading, drainage, and . • • • • E t j j . jj J I STAFF REPORT • TO: Planning Commission FROM: C. John Uben, Consulting Planner DATE: 20 April 1984 PROJECT: Brock Residence Inn LOCATION: Southeast Quadrant of Trunk Highway 5/U.S. 169 and • Interstate 494 APPLICANT: Brock Residence Inn FEE OWNER: Busted Development, Inc. REQUEST: Site Plan Review and Preliminary Plat as an Amendment to • the Exiting Zoning i. Background w.e. ` �� ' 78-14 • This project was before the Planning OFC 1 Commission and City Council in the C�jj 4 month of December 1983 for rezoning and ] ) 1 J / application of Municipal Industrial h ,)r'',^ �- ;^ Development Bonds. The condition of ' /if /i' \- those approvals were the review of a ,j �.2 ��. forthcoming site plan and its subsequent use and PROPOSED S17'E -- '''' )\"r approval. Theproposed ., .-- rezoning are in compliance with the Eden �.\ `,w, es-- ���I �. ,, Prairie Comprehensive Guide Flan dated J\ i �` fir:, May1983. The Comprehensive Plan \ `'- . indicates Regional Commercial for this __ j The hotel site is part of a % \ ' PUB property. �!\ , • piece of land owned by Busted Develop- ( 1 i.g ' ment that contains a single access point �‹. '3 ryJ off of 169. It has been indicated to •�.�' 2`1 the City that the remainder of this par- O .'y \\ y `�` eel will develop as a restaurant and v Rr� j� office. No plans have been submitted to date on the remainder 5.1 acre site. //7�-{r) `-ZZ, I fir' :� 4.t \-� Existing Site Conditions r I•l .:.,. �� ..;. �;, 134, . The subject property is approximately t 1 I;L� 3.85 acres which includes some slope 2 24g4.-''11 easements to the right-of-way of both _q � �;�"''�/ Highway 5 and Interstate 494. The ,to�,t!/ �'�nc parcel man an odd ult. To it h whicht makes :AREA LOCATION MAP development difficult. To the south of tv j 1)1;�;`r0111 ../ S1 L I -_, G'' • the subject property is a triangular- shaped piece of excess right-of-way along Highway 169. The present proposal shows a drainage pond on this right-of-way. The site itself is relatively flat with approximately 30 feet of relief dropping along the edges to the Interstate below. Access is gained through a private road easement to the remainder of the property from a single point of access on 169. Soils and vegetation do not indicate any limitation to development. Summary of Proposal The Brock Residence Inn consists of 16 eight unit buildings and one centralized conference building, together making a hotel campus. The object is to offer hotel suites for the long term visitor. The plan consists of a one-way loop around the perimeter of the property with dead end parking penetrating into the interior portions. Details on the conference building were not included in the submission package. Site Plan • No overall site plan has been submitted for the entire parcel, of which this plan is deeply integrated into the function of the total site. No plan indicating dimensions was included in the package submitted to the City. The subject property has access through a private road easement that accesses off of Highway 169 approximately 350 feet to the east of the project. This leaves a small outlot of less than an acre with only 110 feet of depth. Considering that much of this lot will be consumed with the 35 foot front yard setback, the potential for development in the future is quite poor. The road and parking system proposed along the east edge of • the hotel property directly abuts the remainder outlots offering no provision for an appropriate setback. If the intent is to have shared road and parking facilities, then the overall plan is very important and should be reviewed. In addition, a design framework manual outlining the controls and guidelines for the remainder of the development should be submitted at this time. Because of the location and odd shape of the parcel, the setbacks along some of the right-of-way will be one-half of what is the normal front yard • setback. In reviewing this project, it was assumed that the regulation front yard would be that frontage along Highway 169. The remaining highway frontage along Highway 5 and I-494 would need only meet one-half of the front yard setback. The buildings are setback at least 35 feet from the property line along the southern edge. However, there is a parking aisle (parking is prohibited in the front yard) that also runs through this 35 foot setback, reducing the effective front yard to only 17 feet. Because of the excess right-of-way to the south, a variance may be possible here for the front yard if the remaining right-of-way adjacent to 169 is fully landscaped and maintained. It should be noted that this area also contains the storm drainage pond which should be incorporated into the landscaping ir of this project. Solutions on public right-of-way are temporary at best. 111 The front yard setback for the buildings is met in all cases on the remainder of the site. However, thq side yard setback of 20 feet is not met in many conditions. The minimum distance found between most of the buildings is only 25 to 28 feet. This measurement should be at least 40 feet if each building occupied its own lot. This has strong implications when fire and safety are considered for this type of project. The parking setback should be ten feet along the eastern property line but is 0. The storage of snow is crucial here and the relationship to the remainder of the site. The remainder of the parking is setback ten feet from the right-of-way where the Ordinance would require it to be 17.5 feet from that right-of-way line (one-half of front yard setback). The Ordinance requires a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.4 as a maximum. The proposed development is in excess of 0.5. The first flour FAR is 0.25 (Ordinance maximum is 0.20) and the development when measured within the penthouse lofts has a FAR of 0.57. These ratios indicate a development too intense for the purposes outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. Either additional land should be added to the development or the a number of units reduced on the property now under consideration. Parking/Circulation From the remote service drive from Highway 169 the circulation turns into three dead-end parking lots off of a one-way loop sround the perimeter of the site. The gate house building offers no turn-around or pedestrian access point to check in and get one's key. The one-way loop provides only a 13 foot aisle which ( is too small to meet the fire code which requires a 20 foot fire lane in this condition. The general layout of the circulation is very circuitous • and is much too confusing for efficient travel by incoming guests. The one-way aisle along the southern perimeter of the property will undoubtedly be used for parking as visitors attending parties look for nearby parking spots. At best the connecting of the parking lots would help circulation conditions. However, the tightness of the site does not allow for much improvement in this area. • Most of the walks for pedestrian circulation are between the buildings in • the courtyard areas. These areas have access to the parking lot by single points of access. There is no drop-off or penetration into the parking lot for the movement of pedestrians from their parked cars to the interior walk system. In the winter, snow storage will become a problem and further exacerbate the ability to find parking spots and proper circulation for pedestrians to the building. It should be noted here that it would not be unusual to expect a daily snowfall that could create a 3,400 cubic yard snow removal problem on this site. As the winter snow accumulation grows, • there are always areas where snow is piled and remains without being hauled away. This hotel proposal is not typical of most hotels. It does not include the usual complement of bar, restaurant, and other uses which tend to create a method of sharing their respective parking facilities. In addition, each • one of the suites offers a fireplace and a kitchen, and the penthouses on IL the tops of each one of the buildings also has a loft. The project is designed for the long stay resident in a fashion that operates more like typical housing. It would easily be expected to find more than one person to a room with possibly more than one vehicle. The incident of visitors to 1Qtij • these rooms could be much greater than those found in normal hotels. The accompanying literature also indicates a higher than normal occupancy rate • for these types of units. We believe that a plan showing shared parking of an additional half stall per unit with the adjoining office/retail development would help facilitate an unencumbered parking system. REQUIRED SPACES 128 (One/Room) 12 (One/Employee) 4 (One/Three Seats: 12 Seat Conference Room) TOTAL 144 SPACES PROVIDED -132 (As counted on Submitted Plans) NEEDED SPACES 12 ADDITIONAL SPACES 64 (To Be Shared) The literature accompanying the submission indicates a possibility to convert to a condominium apartment or office structure as an investment protection. Because of the unique character of this development and its residential appearance, the pressure to convert in the future may be quite real. Should the development revert to offices with the parking ratio of five stalls per 1,000 square feet, the total parking needed would be 435 stalls. If the lesser use of condominiums is the object of a conversion, ( then the parking stalls needed at two stalls per dwelling unit would be 256. It is quite obvious that the site cannot come close to accommodating either one of these scenarios. This question of parking and converted uses in the future should be carefully considered by the Planning Commission and City Council as they act upon this request. It is evident that this kind of proof of parking cannot be met and the development cannot convert to other uses in the future. Architecture Each of the 16.buildings is a very residential appearing eight unit, two to three story building with a height of 31 feet. The exterior is both brick and wood siding. Seventy-five percent of the units have fireplaces. A fire proof roof system is strongly recommended in this particular type of building. Because these are commercial buildings and so tightly packed on the site, for fire safety reasons and for the continuation of high quality buildings throughout this area, we would recommend that wood be used only as a trim and accent element and that the remainder of the construction be masonry. Stone or brick exterior treatment is recommended. It is unclear how heating and cooling units arc being incorporated into the design and whether or not they are being appropriately screened. Trash handling should be in compartments attached to a centralized building and not stuck into the yard setback areas along the perimeter of the property Ir where they arc in full public view. Because the site is very prominent, not only to the immediate area but to the whole City of Eden Prairie, we feel that the architectural design is of great importance. These buildings will be a strong statement for regional IJ):9 visitors to the City of Eden Prairie as most of them will pass by this site 41 from one direction or the other. Does a residential scale building belong in this area and should the building more strongly reflect the actual use happening inside of it? Grading and Drainage A permanent easement for the storm pond in the highway right-of-way should be acquired and attached to the submission. A grading plan reflecting the overall site should be strongly looked at as some areas north of the service road arc fairly low for efficient development. To avoid water puddling in the dead end parking areas, we suggest the addition of more catch basins or increasing the slope of the pavement to 0.8 percent or more. Because of the difficulty of removing snow in these parking lots, we believe that ice buildup is a definite problem without appropriate drainage. Signs One pylon sign is being proposed at the northwest edge of the site. This pylon sign being proposed is 40 feet high with two sign faces on it of 105 square feet and 48 square feet. The Ordinance allows only a 20 foot high sign and a sign face of BO square feet or 36 square feet for the minor sign. The required setback for the sign is ten feet, the proposed sign is set back only four feet. The excess to the Ordinance that is being requested is 20 feet in height and 37 square feet in area. Since the sign is already 30 feet above the traffic and very visible, we see no need for any variance from the Ordinance. • Li htin More details on lighting need to accompany the proposal. We need informa- tion as to pole height, location, and isograph showing the dispersion of light. The concern here is glare from the source to the adjoining high- ways. If the lights are not properly located and shielded, we see a great possibility for glare to the regional traffic system. Pedestrian Systems There are no pedestrian drop-offs at the building entrances for the pedestrians. With luggage and other packages, people have to walk between parked cars to get to the single spot that enters into the plaza entrances for each of the buildings. We recommend that an extension of the sidewalk penetrate into the parking lots. The interior walks and plazas that are planned are very good and show a good deal of imagination. We feel they will add greatly to the otherwise intense arrangement of the buildings. Snow removal from these areas should be addressed along with snow removal AB in the parking lots. .ff/ • • Landscaping_ 4 The submitted Landscape Plan should have a complete planting schedule attached to it including such items as key symbol, common name, botanical name, condition of the root ball, and quantities. The attached plan does not have such a plant schedule. The interior planting plan works very well in the plaza areas. The screening to the public roads, however, needs to be improved. The hedge effect that the Ordinance tends to promote does not produce a pleasant appearance along Highway 169 or Highway 5. The treatment designed for the right-of-way along Highway 169 by mixing overstory and pine with the shrub masses works much better. We recommend that same sort of treatment surround the total project and be resubmitted for review. The minimum size of the pines and the spruce should be six feet and the minimum size for the shrubs for screening effect should be five gallon or three feet. The drainage pond should also be landscaped as well as the excess right-of-way to the south. The parking along the northwest perimeter of the property is a long expanse and should be broken up with planting islands every 100 feet. The trash containers should be moved out of the yard setback areas and placed central to the development. We also suggest for year-round interest that ornamental crabs be added to the planting plan. The perimeter landscaping is wholly inadequate and should be revised combining the shrubs with pine, spruce, and shade treed. Using the highway • right-of-way for plantings is a temporary screening solution as they can be removed at any time by the Highway Department • Utilities Adequate service appears to be available. Please see the engineering report for further details. Fire Protection Because the buildings proposed are so small, they escape many of the more safety-minded elements of the building code. As concern over the last few years with hotel fires and hotel safety has risen, we feel that the City of Eden Prairie cannot turn its back on this strong concern of the public. Especially in light of the fact that public assistance is being requested • for this project with financing, we believe that the safety of the public is of primary concern. We recommend that the Fire Marshall review the plan because we believe the buildings are too close, the circulation is unnavigable for fire equipment, the presence of over 100 fireplaces, no adequate alarm system has been provided, and no building sprinkler system sr has been included in the plans. 1C;t • Summar 1 The very high FAR of 0.57, the setback violations for parking, the need for wider fire lanes, the lack of snow storage areas, poor circulation for the parking lots, and closeness of the separate buildings point to a plan that needs to find more space. Some options available would be to increase the number of stories per building so that less buildings would be needed for the same number of units. The open space could be used for improving the circulation and perimeter landscaping. Another option would be to purchase excess highway right-of-way on the south and add that land to the development. Additional recommendations are listed below. A i i Recommendations 1. We recommend that a total site plan be prepared incorporating all the uses anticipated on the total site. This plan should address the issue ` of shared parking and include easements of record to perpetuate that relationship. The outlots indicated and created by the private road should be reviewed for efficient design and development. Snow storage and overall circulation should also be addressed. The floor area ratio of the total site should also not exceed 0.4. We recommend additionally that a design framework manual be prepared for the whole i site so as to not have conflicting characteristics of development and that shared facilities and amenities be properly coordinated. 2. The submitted plan is too intense as confirmed by the many violations - • i of setbacks and the floor area ratio. Also, the fire safety issues A t' indicate that the arrangement of the buildings is not satisfactory. We •recommend that either more land be added to the project from adjacent land to the east or that less buildings be applied to this particular plan. The removal of four buildings would greatly assist in the i circulation and would reduce the floor area ratio to 0.4. 3. The parking is inadequate and we recommend that the shared parking i arrangement with the adjoining land be pursued. We recommend a 0.5 stalls per.unit be added in this manner. The plan should also address better circulation for both pedestrians and automobiles. 4. The sign package should comply with the Ordinance and the proponent E' should submit light details for review by City Staff. 5. The overall concern of snow storage must be addressed specifically • within the site plan. • i 6. Move trash containers to centralized location tied to a building j structure. 7. The proponent should provide proof of parking for conversion of the ! project to condominiums/ offices or remove that option from the investment literature. II 8. The Landscape Plan should be revised with additional overstory and evergreen screening. The shrubs should be of a minimal size of five gallons. A standard planting schedule should be added to the plan. 9. All the fire safety issues should be reviewed with the Fire Marshall with strict compliance for public safety. 10. Since the project is requesting public assistance with financing, we 11 recommend that the buildings have an architecture of the highest quality. • • IL kr10 • p• • .., 11 • ••... • .••• o 1 • 1 J L , . • • • • • i • PRELIMINARY PLAT (3.84 Acres) t' ORIGINAL SITE AREA (4.17 Acres) • • ZONED LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA (4.33 Acres) AREA NECESSARY TO MEET REQUIRED F.A.R. (5.48 Acres) BROCK RESIDENCE FIGURE r 1 I0/I • • • B. BROCK RESIDENCE INN, by Eden Prairie Hotel Company. Request • for Zoning District and Site Plan Amendment, with variances • before the Board of Appeals, for 3.84 acres for 128-unit hotel and Registered Land Survey for 9.2 acres, for two lots. Location: Southeast quadrant of Highway #5 and I-494. A •• • public hearing. Planner Enger reviewed the history of this project and-its previous review by the Planning Commission for this 128-unit hotel. Proponent had submitted a preliminary plan to the City in December, 1983, which showed an original site area of 4.17 acres. The Planning Staff, in their preliminary review of that sketch plan, was concerned about the tightness of the site and suggested that a larger area be zoned in the event that a revised site plan did not • solve the problems of tightness of the site. The area of land zoned by the City was 4.33 acres. The current site plan being reviewed by the City was 3.B4 acres, with a floor area ratio of 0.57. The Staff Report identified many aspects of the site plan which were tight and not acceptable. The amount of land required. for this size of project to meet the 0.4 floor area ratio required.by the City Code would be 5.48 acres. • • Mr. Ken Nelson, Eden Prairie Hotel Company, reviewed the site plan characteristics with the Commission. He stated that approximately 70% of buildings would be brick, with wood trim for exteriors. He added that exterior stairways had been moved to the interior of the buildings, especially considering Minnesota weather. Mr. Nelson stated that they had considered the green areas surrounding the site to be part of their own buffer areas for the site, even though these green areas were actually owned by either the State or Federal Highway Departments for Highway 0169 and Highway I-494. Chairman Bearman asked exactly how much property was involved in the proposal. Staff reviewed the attachment to the Staff report • it Planning Commission Minutes 5 April 23, 1984 • • explaining the various amounts of property involved at various times throughout this proposal. Torjeson asked what specifically had been reviewed and approved in • December, 1983, for this proposal. Planner Enger explained that the site plan was not available for review at that time, however sketches were reviewed to give a general idea of site layout and relationship to surrounding properties of the project. Hallett stated that he concurred with the findings of the Staff report, that the site was too tight as proposed. Torjeson added that he agreed with Hallett. Mr. Nelson responded to the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report. Of major concern to proponents was the requirement f for a site plan of the entire nine-acre parcel as opposed to• a review of just the amount of acreage for the Brock Residence Inn. Staff explained that it is necessary for the City to review an overall proposal in that one site's use may affect access, parking, • and other design features upon which the Planning Commission and Council would be making decisions. He added that it was normal for the City to require such a review on projects of this type. Chairman Bearman reiterated concern regarding the amount of property, involved in the project. He asked that Staff research the item • through the previously approved Developer's Agreement and report • back to the Planning Commission. Chairman Bearman asked for comments and questions from members of the audience. There were none. • MOTION: • Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Hallett, to continue the • public hearing to the May 14, 1984, Planning Commission meeting to allow proponent to revise plans to be in conformance with the recommendations of the Staff Report. Mn+inn rarriad--7-f-fl • 1 • • • i • CITY OFFICES/8950 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD/EDEN PRAIRIE,MN 55344 2499/TELEPHONE I6I2I 937.2262 0 f! C. r : • April 13, 1984 • . • Mr. Mitch Anderson 1030 North State Street Suite #441 Chicago, Illinois 60610 Dear Mitch: • Enclosed please find a certified copy of Ordinance #57-83, which approves the zoning district change for the Brock Residence Inn by your firm.Please note that the Ordinance refers to the Developer's Agreement between the City and Eden Prairie Hotel Company, a copy of which is also enclosed. The City has approved your development proposal and the zoning for this property based on the conditions stated within the agreement. The zoning and agreement were approved by the Council on December 27, 1983. The zoning, as adopted by the Council, is considered appropriate for the project referred to in the Developer's Agreement. Please contact our office if you have any further questions. Sincerely, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE H/v1! i Kate Karnas Administrative Assistant • Planning Department Enclosures TN TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Jean Johnson, Zoning Administrator Staff Representative to Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning OATE: May 9, 1984 RE: SIGN REGULATIONS FOR FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT BACKGROUNO Attached for background is the April 6, 1984 memo from the Advisory Commission and Businessmen. This memo was previously distributed to the Council. Bob Gartner, Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission member, will attend the public hearing and present the item to the Council. Members of the sign sub-committee who are also members of the Flying Cloud Airport Businessmen's Association will be present. They will outline their special needs of 30o sign area on walls facing a runway and free-standing signs toward the runway. Also in attendance with be Mr. Tim Callister from the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). • • REVIEW OF PROPOSEOSIGN REGULATIONS The sign regulations proposed basically follow the commercial district regulations already contained in the City Sign Code. The differences are outlined as follows: BUSINESS SIGNS Wall Signs Only commercial licensed buildings(buildings holding a commercial license from MAC of which there are approximately 12) will be allowed wall signs. The amount of sign area will be according to commercial code--except for walls of commercial licensed buildings facing runways which 30% sign area is desired. Hangar buildings will be limited to 5% sign area on walls. Signs on hangars may only contain identification information not advertisements. Freestanding_Sinns Commercial licensed buildings would be permitted 2 free 11 sfandiriij sins upon the lot they cccupy. One facing the public street and one facing a runway. Signs toward the runway mould he permitted only if they do not interfere with air space requirements (FAR Part 77). The airport businessmen view the runway as an integral frontage to their aviation oriented business, i.e., similar to a commercial use having 2 street frontages. 'tn6 Memo-Sign Regulations for FCM -2- May 9, 1984 MAC SIGNS Signs to be installed and maintained by MAC which will aid in circulation and directory assistance will be: Gate Identification Signs example attached as Exhibit A) One sign per gate identifying the gate number or letter designation and the commercial businesses which are served by the gate. There are presently a total of 7 gate entrances at the airport- 4 along Pioneer Trail and 3 along US 169. • Area Directional Signs (example attached as Exhibit 8) Two signs , one to be located off US 169 and the other off Pioneer Trail. The purpose of these 2 signs would be to depict a snap of the airport property, the gate entrances, and where businesses are located. • They would be placed in parking lot areas off the traveled road. The businessmen involved in drafting the sign regulations have suggested that non conforming or illegal signs be brought into conformance with adopted sign regulations within 3 years of the date of adoption. STAFF COMMENTS • The Planning Staff has the following suggestions to the sign regulations: 30% sign area on walls Tf the Council chooses to grant the 30% sign area for a wall facing a runway, staff suggests a maximum size of 400 sq.ft. For comparison, Menard's sign is 400 sq.ft. and Comb's sign is 200 sq.ft. in size and they are located approximately 500 feet from T.H. 5 . Hangar wall signs Similarly the `.i sign area for hangar buildings is suggested to have a maximum size of 50sq.ft.. The purpose of hangar signs is for• identifi- cation only, not advertisement and therefore a 50 sq.ft. size should be adequate. i'fl • ir Memo-Sign Regulations for FCM -3- May 9, 1984 STAFF COMMENTS, Continued 1 2 freestanding signs If the Council chooses to grant the commercial licensed airport buildings 2 freestanding signs, staff suggests that 1 be no larger than 80 sq.ft. and 20 feet in height and the 2nd sign no larger than 50 sq.ft. This require- ment is also contained in the C-Reg-Ser and C-Hwy Districts of the Sign Code. Future Commercial Licensed Buildings It is anticipated that MAC will continue to receive applications for commercial licenses on the airport either as new construction, as part of new occupancy or remodeling of existing structures. In order for the city to be aware of the proposed new business locations and type of occupancy, staff suggests that such applications be forwarded to the City. • IL Enforcement Authority • • It is suggested that the sign regulations contain a section describing the enforcement responsibilities of MAC and of the City. • • • 11 1ou I • I i i • 1 t J J J 3 O o �tl a W . •5 c� A • �o I Ii O= . 702 CO a. I id ma o C • wa 0 CS • J W O N I • '�.L '♦` , kfl LO Len ii ` a� • X i �1 Q . �\: I (Q3 i: ,,r .., -, Q kr) , . . 1 t -..... . _ ., r_ o ,n I IA I a .Q N .: ..,. u. _. o ch 3 .� go 0 v ® WC0 a I ' CI l : : a. COIn i2 Z C ,S om 4 ._ I:.. ao 0 t a ' I oO _' IZP I3 0 oIs( 3 0 �jy • i �Myr. f" e' v�J CO CI '•� N CA Nil H I 0 allf111. � � in n 0 I � Lam{ f i ( p 0 II d W O Q 2 C7Q 5 M ce o� i 1 Wa a J �7 !C LL w -v) W O > 4: VI 1 t C . In . X 1 I0 f 1 O �� ® ii 1 > t- . c' 1 I in H I I I 1 I C v a tu L j � O a [4-1 O r lI C L r % Pf, Y_ p1 N L�1 3 N f 3 C r 4- h 1 O I S..ii i {,N � RI . amr- I ! V • A 3 1 i ; I a a ,po i .s 3 • a v- Q i . ..------"F . . I, 3 i • i. I 1 • • "( REQUEST • TO: Mayor and City Council TROM: Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission, and " Flying Cloud Airport Businessman's Association DATE: April 6, 1984 RE: SIGNAGE AT FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT ' For the past 5 months, the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission has discussed "and worked out proposed sign regulations for the airport. This involved the formation of a sign sub-committee from the Airport's Businessman's Association to assist the commission in outlining the type of signage and airport needs. Since the airport Public District was not included in the original Sign Ordinance, we understand an amendment is required to adopt airport sign regulations. We believe the proposed draft address the sign needs of the airport. • For directional and business signs at the airport, the following is recommended: Wall Signs: The total area of all wall signs on any wall of a commercial licensed building shall not exceed 15% of the wall area of that wall when said wall area does not exceed 500 square feet. When said surface area • exceeds 500 square feet, then the total area of such wall sign shall not exceed 75 square feet plus 5% of the wall area in excess of 500 square feet, provided that the maximum sign area for any wall sign shall be 300 square feet. Wall area shall be computed individually for each tenant in a multi- tenant building based on the exterior wall area of the space that tenant occupies. A commercial licensed building having a wall which faces a runway of the airport shall be permitted a wall sign not to exceed 30% of the wall area • facing the runway. Only one such sign shall be allowed per commercial licensed building. The total area of all wall signs on any :tall of a hangar building, not possessing a commercial license shall not exceed 5% of the wall area of that wall. Such signs shall contain identification information and may not • contain advertising information. Free Standing Signs: Only one free standing accessory sign for each commercial licensed building site per public street frontage shall be permitted. One free standing accessory sign located along the runway side shall also be permitted for each commercial licensed building. The total area of each free standing sign shall not exceed 80 square feet. The maximum height of free standing signs shall be 20 feet subject to Part 77 of Federal Air Regulations (to provide for air space requirements). Gate identification Signs: One sign per gate provided the total area of any sign shall not uxcec7 32 square feet and a maximum height of 10 feet. (example attached) !CYO- Area Directional Signs: One sign listing locations of all commercial icensed business per street frontage is allowed, provided the total area of any sign shall not exceed 80 square feet and a maximum height of 10 feet. And further provided that only commercial licensed businesses are listed. Review Process: A sign request will be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department after review by and approval of the Metropolitan Airports Commission is received. Conditions listed in the sign code applicable to all districts shall be applicable • to the airport except as contained herein. • Non-conforming or illegal signs existing as of the date of adoption shall be required to comply with these regulations 3 years from the date of adoption. Definition for wall area: Any vertical area computed from the floor to the roof times the visible continuous width including windows and doors of the space occupied by the sign • owner. • • • • • • •• P f t. 1 f • t The Flying Cloud Businessmen's Association , at its Dec. 5, 1983 meeting tproposed and agreed to the following: t 1. That existing signs be "grendfathercd" for 3 Pears, to present owner only. This isContingent on MAC providing directory signs. 1j 2. That no "off premise" signs are necessary, again assuming that the • MAC will provide directory signs. d 3. That all signs facing the roads (169 and Co. Rd. I) submit to the the standard sign ordinance, commercial district. 4. That.businesses be allowed up to 50% of their buildings facing runways be used for signs. 5. That each business be allowed one free standing sign on the airport side of their business. / • !6EE)P,) • 1 1, i. Larry Degner, • • _ Sect., FCBA . I; µ II i is tI. . t o ! .I . I(.1 - T i Flying Cloud Businessman's Association Flying Cloud Airport May 10, 1984 TO: . Mayor and City Council, Eden Prairie City Office 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 1 FROM: Flying Cloud Businessman's Association F SUBJECT: SIGN REGULATIONS FOR FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT i This morning the Flying Cloud Businessman's Association met to discuss the upcoming request for sign regulations as proposed in the April 6, 1984 letter addressed to you. Many of those in attendance, have participated on the sign subcommittee and also 1 on the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission. 1. We have one problem with this request, as written by Eden Prairie . Planning Staff. This is in the last paragraph of the letter under i Definition of Wall Area and as shown in the drawings. 1 AI Due to the special nature of most hangar buildings, most of the 1 - available wall space on the gable end of a hangar is used for door j open. The only possible place for a sign is above the door and 1 underneath the roof line. Under present interpretation of Planning Staff this area above the door can be classified as roof area (see drawings) and, therefore, any sign placed there is nonconforming. We had agreed to support the request as written with the under- standing that this interpretation would be changed to show the 1 entire gable end of the building under the roof line to be "wall" area. This would then allow a sign above the door to conform to ;1 regulations. 1 In addition, our membership reviewed the memo dated May 9, 1984 from Staff. In the "Staff Comments" section, we find that the + recommended 400 square feet maximum size is to limiting for a sign i facing the runway. 1 The example given for Menard's sign shows intent to reach people 500 feet away on Highway 5. At our airport we have pilots on the j i --_J 1 II 1 V P i ELTING CLOUD FIELD • EDEN PRAIRIE,MN 55344 10�� TOWER 111.1 • GROUND 121.7 • TOR 111.11 1 36 J Mayor and City Council, Eden Prairie Page 2 • ground trying to find our businesses up to 3/4 of a mile away across the field. We feel that the 30% sign area should be left as it was recommended without any other limitations. Sincerely, FLYING CLOUD BUSSINESS N"S ASSOCIATION Timothy4-21 . Ashenfelt r, President • TPA/tkl • • • IL1 • 1 • ,. 1 i i t These are typical endwalls of aircraft hangars. For puppose of signage, the surfaces shown are considered wall area and can be used to determine area and location of signs. 1. I • j METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION- MA ,0-:-..,,,,. itittatetisoubotts 0 coptAit pout . r' P.O.BOX 1700 • TWIN CITY AIRPORT • MINNESOTA 55111 '-4,.. `"4 OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR • PHONE(612)726.1592 1 • 1 March 27, 1984 • Ms. Jean Johnson • City Offices 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Jean: Attached are a couple of proposals I have received for entrance signs at the Flying Cloud Airport. These are possibilities but not necessarily the final product. • S• ce el , Of.N CL� Tim llister, Manager Reliever Airports enes. • /as ' 1 • • • • 1 • - \0b'� .u. cn ...WEST TERMINAL ARCH—I.1INNCAPOLIS•SAINT PAUL 1NTCRNATIONAL AtfPO41T I --- ---- , ( . . . .. aP�� -''''' . • • i . . - . &RECYTEARTA Jl C; ILY S . � [_EE7] MiD TT[E , _ . . viir:Drrnr[PiriT-gir YL1& Brit a .. ��, . t li� ... ,...i., , ,ii I �,ll�l/LN\ OrThr-pm , LI-ri &V{li,._ L'17D �.1)V; 11 it '1/q, P1:?(i t�,, " !Ill A• nowgi?sEivo ,AurR. /.7flAys �l F�Cc4.1 1E L0 C RTh ti I. Tli i:ZiMFROCIL[� b'ZlLA FIC • u llC.i�)l,":Llin 'MO O ,i2 U L.. \l,,ti:DTI!L;/[1iJ1t_.; li�a�_',lr 1��,C ll l �r!✓ 110 2Z 0�' �..,,�:� 'ACC,0,n1: 1. 2 i''�' 111 l�_llJa CJII,fi\�!l:, uf,!(tJ�r1'� �r:\�.t�aLR,..'! I I I ) s 01,mo g G to S so rn Ir . N • 1 ., mthviipA,•loots- • ,. ...0.),:iva Poll • . f1 I I TROPULITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION ,••• I' II IRIS I i WI • TWIN CITY AIRPORT • MINNESOTA 55511 ' OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR • PHONE(812)728.1892 . August 23, 1983 • Jean Johnson • Planning Department • : • ' • City of Eden Prairie • • 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Ms. Johnson: • In response to concerns expressed to you by the Eden Prairie City Council regarding the Metropolitan Airports Commission position on airport tenant compliance with city rules, regulations, of aJanuary,and codes, please find enclosed a copy 1983 etter • to the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission regarding this i subject. Not only is it a policy of the MAC but it is included In all leases between the Commission and its tenants. - ' . If you should need additional information or further clarification, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, 4, Jeff Hamiel, Director • Operations and Environmental Affairs JH:aas a . i Enc. 1 I 3 I . • it • ,•.I.es I I'I AlIi111 -60101PII AVE. .o •WI Si TCIIMINAI MICA.-MINNIAPOIIS•SAINT PAUL INTCNIIATIONAI AIRP0111 T it/tv•mizoipottse • 0.0vity Pctut , METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION P.O.BOX 1700 • TWIN CITY AIRPORT • MINNESOTA 55111 1 �'+, `A OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR • PHONE(612)726.1892 i , January 24, 1983 i f Ms. Sally Brown, Chairman i 1 Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road jil • Eden Prairie, MN. 55344 Dear Chairman Brown: At the January 5, 1983, meeting of the Flying Cloud Advisory Commission, the Metropolitan Airports Commission was asked to prepare a position statement concerning MAC policy as it relates to the Eden Prairie Ordinance on public signs. • The Commission has had a long standing policy of complying with all local codes, regulations, and ordinances that are in effect in communities where MAC airports are located. This• policy is reflected in all MAC leases with 4[. both storage and commercial lease tenants. Specifically, the Secondary Airports Commercial Lease, revised May 1980, • clearly states the Commission policy as follows; Paragraph ELEVENTH, B. Whether or not the foregoing bonds, security and insurance shall be waived • Tenant shall • (1) Procure from the necessary • authority any building permits • that may be required. . (2) Do or cause the work to be done • in a good and workmanlike manner - and to be completed within a reason- able time and in conformity with such building codes, zoning ordinances, or regulations and orders of any lawful authority applicable to the airport. Also, the FOURTEENTH paragraph of the Commercial Lease states; • That the Tenant shall comply with all laws • of the United States, and State of Minnesota, and the ordinances, rules, regulations and orders of any of the foregoing or of any f department thereof, or of the Lessor relating 0 ; to said leased premises and with respect to • control of ground and air traffic aircraft , ,,,g, operations and the general use of the airport. OFFICE LOCATION-0040 761h AVE.SO.-WEST TERMINAL AREA-MINNEAPOLIS•SAINT PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT I • January 24, 1983 Chairman Brown Page 2 Finally,the Metropolitan Airports Commission retains the right of approval of all signs as is stated in Paragraph TWENTY-THIRD; "That on the leased premises the Tenant shall be allowed to erect suitable advertising signs to advertise its business, subject to the prior written approval of the Lessor as to the form, type, size, location and method of installation." The same lease requirements are found in the Secondary Airports Aircraft Storage Lease dated May, 1980. Specific references are found In Paragraph Second, B (1) and (2), and Sixth, respectively. The paragraph referring to "Erection of Signs" is not included in the storage lease because the Commission would not approve a permanent advertising sign for private storage facilities. Considering the above references to Commission leases, it is clear that the MAC requires all airport tenants comply with local rules. Further, the Commission retains the authority to correct a situation that would appear to be a violation of existing laws. MAC policy relative to erection of signs or airport property is predicated upon the appropriate zoning which would permit a commercial operator on the airport the same privilates other non-airport commercial businesses within the community enjoy. If you should have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. incerely, • • Jeff Hamiel, Director Operations and Environmental Affairs • JH:aas laPiLk I r i f 1 3 S TO: Mayor and Council FROM: John Frane DATE: May 10, 1984 RE: Preliminary approval of MIDB'S for McGlynn Bakeries 1,650,000 Resolution 84-120 McGlynn Bakeries proposes to construct a 32,000 square foot addition to their existing facility. The project would increase employment by 20 persons to a total employment at the bakery of 145 people. Mr. Burton McGlynn would own the building and lease it to the Bakery. The property is zoned I-2 Park which is correct for the intended �!- use. Resolution 84-120 is attached for your consideration. • IL iv95 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA • Application for Industrial Development Bond Project Financing 1. APPLICANT: Burton J. McGlynn a. Business Name - McGlynn Bakeries, Inc. (Lessee) b. Business Address -7752 Mitchell Road • Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 c. Business Form (corporation, partnership, sole proprietor- . ship, etc.) - corporation • • • d. State of Incorporation or organization - Minnesota e. Authorized Representative - Burton J. McGlynn - Chairman • • Michael J. McGlynn- President f. Phone - 937-9404 2. NAME(S) AND ADDRESSES OF MAJOR STOCKHOLDERS OR PRINCIPALS: • a. Burton J. McGlynn 6820 Cheyenne Circle Edina, Minnesota 55435 b. Patricia McGlynn . kp0 Cheyenne Circle Edina, Minnesota 55435 c. Michael McGlynn • 5024 Bruce Place Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1- t1( il c? • • • .4 3. GIVE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF BUSINESS, PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS, ETC: McGlynn Bakeries, Inc. is engaged in the production of ' baked foods primarily for sale at retail. . The products'are sold through approximately 1001ocations in' five states and are produced in a number of baking faci1lities. 4. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Acquisition and construction of a 32,000 square foot addition to an existing facility at 7752 Mitchell .Road, to be owned by Burton J. McGlynn and leased to McGlynn Bakeries, Inc. for use as a warehouse and R manufacturing facility. 752 Mitchell Road I a. Location and intended use: 7E7en Prairie The new facilities will enhance production. b. Present ownership of project site: 3i Owned by Burton J. McGlynn, leased to McGlynn Bakeries,. Inc. • c. Names and address of architect, engineer, and general ' contractor: C. F. Haglin and Son, Inc. 4005 West 65th Street 1 Edina, Minnesota 55435 rit . 5. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST FOR:Land $ 210,000 000 Construction Contracts 1.400. Equipment Acquisition and installation* -0- 128,Q00 Architectural and Engineering 12,000 Legal • _0_ Interest during Construction _0_ Bond Reserve _0_ Contingencies --u-^ Loan Fees Other • • Total $ 1,650,000 *Heating and air conditioning should be included as building costs. • Indicate the kind of equipment to be acquired here. .1 ' 1 • • 3 • , -2- - 1 M• • 6. BOND ISSUE - • a. Amount of proposed bond issue - $1,650,000 ' b. Proposed date of sale of bond - May 1, 1984 • c. Length of bond issue and proposed maturities - 15 years d. Proposed original purchaser of bonds - First Southdale National Bank of Edina . 7001 France Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55435 . e. Name and address of suggested trustee - • • None f. Copy of any agreement between Applicant and original purchaser - None • g. Describe any interim financing sought or available -• The Company sought conventional financing, but that was not available at a fixed rate over the proposed . h. Describer nature and amount of any permanent financing in addition to bond financing -• • None • 7. BUSINESS PROFILE - a. Are you located in the City of Eden Prairie? Yes " 17un. ^f employees in Edpn Prairie? �. i. Before this project: 125 • -3- • • . , • • ii. After this project? 145 • c. Approximate annual sales - $ 22 million • d. Length of time in business Since 1962 • in Eden Prairie 9 years e. Do you have plants in other locations? If so, where? • • 13 bakeries at various locations in Minnesota, Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri and Wisconsin. • • f. Are you engaged in international trade? No A. • 8. OTHER INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT(S): • a. List the name(s) and location(s) of other industrial development project(s) in which the Applicant is the ' owner or "substantial user" of the facilities or a • "releated person" within the meaning of Section 103(b)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code. • $1,300,000 City of Eden Prairie Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (McGlynn Bakeries, Inc. Project) Series . 1980 the proceeds of which were used to finance the warehouse, manufacturing and office facility at 7752 Mitchell Road. $900,000 City of Eden Prairie Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (McGlynn Bakeries, Incorporated Project) , Series 1983, the proceeds of which were used to construct additions and improvements to the facility at 7752 Mitchell . Road, and to acquire and install certain equipment. • -4- r • b. iList all ndustrialities in which the revenue development plicant financing. as requested financing ft None • • c. Detail the status of any request the Applicant has before any other city for industrial development revenue financing. . None • Ar Illb d. List any city in which the Applicant has been refused • industrial development revenue financing. • None ' • • • . e. List any city (and the project name) where the Applicant has acquired preliminary approval to proceed but _n which final approval authorizing the financing has been denied. None • -5- 1\UJ• • • • I. If Applicant has been denied industrial development revenue financing in any other city as identifiedfe10 al fi in (d) or (e), specify the reason(s) for the officials eni 111 and the name(s) of appropriate cityj have knowledge of the transaction. • Not Applicable 4 i 1 9. NAMES AND ADDRESS OF: a. Underwriter (If public offering) Ib. Private Placement Purchaser (If private placement) , First Southdale National Bank of Edina 7001 France Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55435 i. If lender.will not commit until City h • passed its preliminary resolution approving ' the project, submit a letter from proposed • lender that it has an interest in the offering subject to appropriate City • approval and approval of the Commissioner of Securities, • -6- • 1t01 • • b. Bond Counsel - Faegre & Benson 2300 Multifoods Tower Minneapolis, MN 55402 (Stephen Rosholt) • c. Corporate Counsel - Evidon & Weisberg, P.A. Parkdale 4, Suite 110 5353 Gamble Dr. d. Accountant - St. Louis Park, MN 55416 (Burton G. Weisberg) Arthur Andersen & Co. Midwest Plaza Building Minneapolis, MN '55402 l0. WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR: • a. Construction start - May 1, 1984 b. Construction completion - • May 1, 1985 • • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Burton J. McGlynn or Michael J. McGlynn, McGlynn Bakeries, Inc., 7752 Mitchell Road (937-9404)The.undersigned Applicant understands that the approval or disapproval by the City of Eden Prairie for Industrial . • Development bond financing does not expressly or impliedly constitute any approval, variance, or waiver of any provision or requirement relating to any zoning, building, or other rule or ordinance of the City of Eden Prairie, or any other law • applicable to the property included in this project. BURTON J. M c„ZMCGLYNN BAKERIES, INC. BURTON J. MCG NN Applicant (Lessee) Applicant ,/e/e/ • . / / • Y. ' ?—� — t/ Date -7- t U):- 11. ZONING - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT R. Property is zoned - b. Present zoning (is) (is not) correct for the intended use. • c. Zoning application received on for which is correct for the • intended use. d. Variances required - • _. City Planner • • • -g- t12 RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT BY BURTON J. MCGLYNN UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE MINNESOTA ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR APPROVAL THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. There has been presented to this Council a pro- posal by Burton J. McGlynn (the "Borrower") that the City undertake and finance a project pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474 (the "Act") generally consisting of the acquisition and construction of a 32,000 square foot addition to an existing facility at 7752 Mitchell Road in the City, to be owned by the Borrower and leased to McGlynn Bakeries, Inc. for use as a warehouse and manufacturing facility (the "Project") . Under the proposal, the Borrower will enter into a revenue agreement with the City upon such terms and conditions as are necessary to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay when due the principal of and the interest on up to approximately $1,650,000 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds of the City to be issued pursuant to the Act, to provide monies for the acquisition, construction and installation of the Project; and the City will pledge its interest in the revenue agreement to secure the bonds. 2. As required by the Act, this Council conducted a public hearing on , 1984 on the proposal to undertake and finance the Project after publication in the official newspaper and a newspaper of general circulation in the City of a notice setting forth the time and place of hearing; stating the general nature of the Project and an estimate of the principal amount of bonds or other obligations to be issued to finance the Project; stating that a draft copy of the proposed Application to the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection at the office of the City Clerk, in the City Hall, at all times between the hours of A.M. and P.M. each day except Saturdays, Sundays and legal. holidays to and including the day of hearing; and stating that all parties who appear at the public hearing shall have an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. The draft application to the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, was on file ".. and available for public inspection at the place and times set forth in the notice. -3- • 3. It is hereby found, determined and declared that the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 474.01 of the Act in that the purpose of the Project is and the effect thereof will be to promote the public welfare by the attraction, encourage- ment and development of economically sound industry and commerce so as to prevent, so far as possible, the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; the reten- tion and development of industry to use the available resources of the community, in order to retain the benefit of its existing investment in educational and public service facilities; by halting the movement of talented, educated personnel of mature age to other areas and thus preserving the economic and human resources needed as a base for providing governmental services and facilities; and the more intensive development of land avail- able in the area to provide a more adequate tax base to finance the cost of governmental services in the Municipality, county and school district where the Project is located. 4. The Borrower has entered into preliminary dis- cussions with First Southdale National Bank of Edina, as lender, and the lender has reported that the Project and the sale of bonds therefor are feasible. IL 5. The Borrower has agreed to pay any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the Project whether or not the Project is approved by the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority and whether or not the Project is carried to completion. 6. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to approval of the Project by the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority and subject to final approval by this Council and by the purchasers of any bonds to be issued as to the ultimate details of the Project and as to the terms of the bonds. 7. In accordance with Section 474.01, Subd. 7 of the Act, the Mayor, the City Manager, and such other officers and representatives of the City as may from time to time be designated are hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority and request its approval thereof, and the Mayor, the City Manager, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the Authority with such preliminary information as it may require. The Borrower, Faegre & Benson as bond counsel, the City Manager, the City Attorney, and other City officials are also authorized to initiate the preparation of a proposed loan agreement and such other documents as may be necessary or appropriate to the Project so that, when and if the proposed Project is approved by the -4- C Authority and this Council gives its final approval thereto, the Project may be carried forward expeditiously. 8. The preliminary approval granted hereby shall not operate to give priority to the Project over any other project if any maximum limit is hereafter imposed on the amount of tax exempt industrial development bonds the City may issue in any year. The City Council reserves the right to allocate any such maximum bonding authority in any manner which, in its discretion, the Council deems to be in the best interests of the City and reserves the right to decline to make any allocation whatsoever. 9. The Borrower is hereby authorized to enter into such contracts, in his own name and not as agent for the City, as may be necessary for the construction of the Project by any means available to him and in the manner he determines without advertisement for bids as may be required for the acquisition or construction of other municipal facilities, but the City shall not be liable on any such contracts. 10. All commitments of the City expressed herein are subject to the condition that within twelve months of the date of adoption of this resolution the City and the applicant shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the revenue agreement, the bonds and of the other instruments and proceedings relating to the bonds and their issuance and sale. If the events set forth herein do not take place within the time set forth above, or any extension thereof, and the bonds are not sold within such time, this resolution shall expire and be of no further effect. • • } ' I t -5- • • MAY 15,1984 134'. VOID OUT CHECK 12.88- 135 DANA GIBBS APRIL 84 PACKET DELIVERIES 91.00 135 STEVEN R SINELL MAY EXPENSES 165.00 1351D WENDY BURNS CARLSON INSTRUCTOR-SWIMMING CLASSES/FEES PAID 860.90 13511 RALPH KRATOCHVIL INSTRUCTOR-EXERCISE CLASSES/FEES PAID 341.80 13512 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-SENIOR CITIZENS NEWSLETTER 27.85 13513 EDEN PRAIRIE ROTARY CLUB EXPENSES 26.00 13514 MARTHA BALFANZ REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 2.00 13515 PAULA ELVERCROG REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 9.00 13516 MICHAEL JAEB REFUND-GOLF CLASSES 33.00 13517 CHERYL LARSON REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 14.00 13518 ARLIS OLSON REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 4.00 13519 DENNIS RAKOCY REFUND-TENNIS CLASSES 20.00 1352D BOBBI YE REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 21.00 13521 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 1839.88 13522 QUALITY WINE CO WINE 504.70 i3523 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR LIQUOR 2821.65 13524 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 1717.63 13525 TWIN CITY WINE CO WINE 1547.73 13526 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING WINE 1447.02. 13527 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 324.95 13528 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 4/27/84 17412.60 13529 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 4/27/84 9933.04 13530 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS PAYROLL 4/27/84 12837.97 13531 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE PAYROLL 4/27/84 114.00 1317. MIPi?ESOTA STATE RETIREMENT PAYROLL 4/27/84 35.00 1_ .. GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 4/27/84 ' 4123.00 13534 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS PAYROLL 4/27/84 110.75 13535 PERA PAYROLL 4/27/84 15981.57 13536 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK PAYROLL 4/27/84 37.50 13537 MR STEAK EXPENSES 1474.63 13538 PETTY CASH EXPENSES 69.9R 13539 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF P/S MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS 30.50 1354D STAR CITIES CONFERENCE CONFERENCE-ASSISTANT MANAGER 40.00 13541 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CONFERENCE-ASSISTANT MANAGER 135.00 13542 JODY CO1PTON REFUND-RED WING TRIP 17.00 13543 MENARDS CAULK/FOAM SEALANT-PARK MAINTENANCE 34.80 - 13544 FLOYD CARPENTER REFUND-GOLF CLASSES 50.00 13545 DIRECTOR OF PROPERTY TAXATION -FIRST 1/2 OF PROPERTY TAXES-MILLER & MORE 1485.63 • PROPERTY 13546 WENDY PRICE REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 21.00 13547 QUALITY FITNESS INSTRUCTOR-FITNESS CLASSES/FEES PAID 188.Ou 13548 RALPH KRATOCHVIL INSTRUCTOR-EXERCISE CLASSES/FEES PAID 26.00 13549 SUPPI.EES 7 HI ENTERPRISES INC MAY RENT-LIQUOR STORE 3475.94 • 13550 NORTHCO LTD MAY RENT-LIQUOR STORE 3390.2.3 13551 DAN BURGESS SHINGLES-PARK MAINTENANCE 40.0 13552 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 3731.5:' 13553 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 3418.3: 13554 HOPKINS POSIMASTER POSTAGE-SUMMER BROCHURE 651.9: 13555 TWIN CITY WINE CO WINE 370.30 55 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 390.1,': i7 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE 91.12 13558 STATE OF MINNESOTA BIKE REGISTRATIONS/FEES PAID 99.00 13559 QUALITY WINE CO LIQUOR 1303.9:' j, 13560 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 172.1u 9309902 13561 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING WINE 451.8' 13562 OCTAGON HOUSE RED WING TOUR/FEES PAID 67.5t 13563 MR G J YUNAU RED WING TOUR/FEES PAID 9.00 1�` GLEN LAKE BAKERY RED WING TOUR/FEES PAID 12.20 13sv5 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC CONFERENCE-MANAGER & FINANCE DIRECTOR 40.00 13566 JIM BERGSTROM SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT 400.00 13567 RICK RABENORT SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 300.0t' 13568 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT 6D.00 13569 KAREN PULSNEY REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 9.00 13570 NORMA SCHEE REFUND-RED WING TOUR 34.00 13571 BEER WHOLESALERS INC BEER 3675.25 13572 CITY CLUB DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 7451.20 13573 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO MIXES 420.20 13574 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 3142.36 13575 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER 4982.45 13576 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 165.60 13577 GRIGGS BEER DISTRIBUTORS BEER 3057.R'' 13578 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 230.60 13579 A J OGLE INC BEER 743.00 13580 PEPSI-COLA/7 UP BOTTLING CO MIXES 452.45 13581 ROYAL CROWN COLA MIXES 113.9E 13582 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 7913.10 13583 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BOND PAYMENTS 77771.44 13584 NORWEST BANK MINNEAPOLIS BOND PAYMENT 31483.50 13585 CONTINENTAL BANK TRUST BOND PAYMENT 2512.50 13586 VOID OUT EHECK 0.00 13587 MIDWEST PAVING & RECYCLING SERVICE-CREEKRIDGE ESTATES 2520.50 1 R8 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 50638.8/ 1 ) PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTORS INC SERVICE-TECHNOLOGY DRIVE & MITCHELL DRIVE B467.75 13 90 SHAFER CONTRACTING INC SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 252893.0] 13591 SHAFER CONTRACTING CO INC SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 54737.04 13592 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 13.05 13593 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 647.47 13594 .ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 189.67 13595 STUART ALEXANDER MILEAGE 82.50 13596 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO MOPS/DUSTERS-LIQUOR STORE 8.8E 13597 RUTH ANDERSON INSTRUCTOR/HERB GARDENING/FEES PAID 40.00 13598 ARTWORKS 4 PHOTOGRAPHS-WATER PLANT LOBBY 131.76 13599 ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS BOOKS-FIRE DEPT 20.00 13600 ASPEN CARPET CLEANING CARPET CLEANING-P/S BUILDING 55.00 13601 TERRY AUSTIN INSTRUCTOR/EXERCISE CLASSES/FEES PAID 2454.40 13602 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY PAINT/PRIMER/GOGGLES/SANDPAPER/MUD FLAPS 170.79 13603 AUTO PARTS PRO OF HOPKINS AIR CONDITIONER COMPRESSOR-EQUIP MAINT 256.65 13604 ROGER C:ADENHOPE REFUND-FITNESS CLASSES 18.00 13605 BAILEY NURSERIES INC TREES-P/S BUILOING 731.00 13606 BARRETT MOVING & STORAGE CO SERVICE-STREET DEPT 6.00 13607 BLOOMINGTON LOCKSMITH CO DUPLICATE KEYS-POLICE DEPT 40.40 13608 BLUMBERG AUDIO-VISUAL PROJECTOR & CART-POLICE DEPT 608.00 13609 BROOKDALE FORD INC 2 1984 FORD LTD-POLICE DEPT 21224.70 13610 BROOKDALE FORD INC THREE 1984 FORD LTD-POLICE DEPT 31750.50 13611 ANDREA BROSCH INSTRUCTOR/RACQUETBALL/FEES PAID 120.00 13612 BRUNSON INSTPUMENT CO EQUIPMENT-ENGINEERING DEPT 175.00 lar,3 RYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC ROCK 3587.93 1 _4 C11RISTINE BURGRAFF INSTRUCTDR/ROSE GARDENING CLASSES/FEES PD 20.00 57130731 i 1 T• 1 13615 BURTON EQUIPMENT INC SHELVES-POLICE DEPT 1506.94 13616 BUTCIIS BAR SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 390.85 11 7 STEVE CADY HOCKEY OFFICIAL./FEES PAID 24.0D 1 SUE CARLSON REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 9.00 13 19 CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT CO 8 SETS WHEEL WEIGHTS-PARK DEPT 880.00 13620 CARLOYN CASSOLA INSTRUCTOR/GUITAR CLASSE/FEES PAID 292.00 13621 CHANHASSEN BUMPER TO BUMPER -EXHAUST PIPE/BRAKE ROTOR/AIR FILTERS/ 2047.35 -SPARK PLUGS/HOSES/FAN BELTS/CHOKE/SANDER/ -FUEL PUMP/STARTER/WATER PUMP/BATTERIES/ DISTRIBUTOR CAP/FUSES 13622 CHICAGO WALLPAPER & PAINT PAINT-GRILL HOUSE 138.71 13623 CLEVELAND COTTON PRODUCTS TOWELS-WATER DEPT 365.75 13624 CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SERVICE INC STUDS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 31.95 13625 CLUTCH & U-JOINT BURNSVILLE INC HOSES/CABLE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 91.19 13626 JOHN COMELY INSTRUCTOR/FLOWER GARDENING/FEES PAID 120.00 13627 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY INC HDODS-FIRE DEPT 25.70 13628 COPY EQUIPMENT INC VELLUM-PLANNING & PARK PLANNING 39.95 13629 GLENN CORRIVEAU REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 12.00 13630 COUNTRY CLUB MARKET INC SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 92.64 13631 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CO NAME PLATES 45.86 13632 CURLE PRINTING COMPANY INC BUSINESS CARDS 42.00 13633 CUTLER MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 1583.77 13634 WARD F DAHLBERG MAY EXPENSES 80.00 13635 HOWARD DAHLGREN ASSOCIATES SERVICE 792.80 13636 DALCO CLEANING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 85.27 13637 DENISON MAILING SERVICE SERVICE-ASSESSING DEPT 8D.83 13638 EUGENE DIETZ APRIL EXPENSES 166.40 13 'o DONS SOD SERVICE -SOD-FLYING CLOUD SOCCER FIELDS/STARING 629.00 LAKE PARK 13640 DORHOLT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 389.00 13641 DRI INDUSTRIES-POLICE DEPT SCREWS-POLICE DEPT 16.75 13642 STEVEN C DURHAM APRIL MILEAGE 16.25 13643 CLERK OF COURTS-EAU CLAIRE CTY WITHHOLDING FROM EMPLOYEE PER COURT ORDER 47.20 13644 EOEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPT EXPENSES 9.61 13645 EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS SUBSCRIPTION 10.00 13646 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT #272 APRIL 84 CUSTODIAL SERVICE 1104.78 13647 EDEN PRAIRIE TRANSMISSION REPAIR TRANSMISSION-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 566.30 13648 EDEN PRAIRIE TRASIITRONICS APRIL 84 TRASH PICKUP 302.50 13649 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS CONCRETE BLOCKS-ROUND LAKE PARK 206.65 13650 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC 4 RAINCOATS/GLOVES-STREET GARAGE/BLDG DEPT 365.43 13651 JEFF ELWELL MILEAGE 94.40 13652 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC AIRWAY-FIRE DEPT 45.80 13653 EMPIRE-CROWN/AUTO INC FLOOR MATS/HEADLIGHTS-POLICE DEPT 109.45 13654 CHRIS ENGER APRIL EXPENSES 195.00 13655 RON ESS HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 630.00 13656 EXIDE BATTERY SALES 6 BATTERIES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 297.02 13657 FEED-RITE CONTROLS INC SULFATE/NOZZLE/GASKET-WATER DEPT 3559.85 13658 FLOY FELTMAN INSTRUCTOR/BLACKJACK CLASSES/FEES PAID 48.00 13659 JAN FLYNN MARCH & APRIL MILEAGE 66.75 13660 CITY OF FRIDLEY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT ON PRINTER 407.00 13661 G & K SERVICES TOWELS/JACKETS 161.50 13662 GENERAL CO4.MUNICATIONS INC RADIO REPAIR & PARTS 502.26 oir, GLIDDEN PAINT PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE 121.4D 13t BF GOODRICH TIRE CENTER 14 RADIAL TIRES-POLICE DEPT 616.92 1946378 11')'' • • t3665 GOPHER SIGN CO MARKING PAINT-WATER DEPT 154.79 1366G KARIN GORI INSTRUCTOR/CALLIGRAPHY CLASSES/FEES PAID 120.00 1364 DALE GREEN CO SOD-STREET DEPT 6.25 1366b MATT & MARCIA GUNDLOCH INSTRUCTOR/SAILING CLASSES/FEES PAID 60.00 13669 GUNNAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC ELECTRICAL WORK-ROUND LAKE PARK 833.81 1367D JACK HACKING EXPENSES 92.44 13671 TROY HANSON OPEN GYM SUPERVISOR/FEES PAID 160.00 13672 KARIN HARRIS INSTRUCTOR/EXERCISE CLASSES/FEES PAID 739.20 t3673 JIM HATCH SALES COMPANY INC WIRE-PARK MAINTENANCE 33.65 13674 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER SIGNS/OXYGEN/ACETYLENE-PARK MAINTENANCE 60.09 t3675 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER SERVICE-COUNTY ROAD 39 115525.35 t3676 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT & WITHHOLDING FROM EMPLOYEE PER COURT ORDER 80.00 13677 HENNEPIN COUNTY MARCH 84 BOARD OF PRISONERS 3834.25 13678 HERITAGE PRINTING PRINTING-COiMUNITY CENTER & POLICE DEPT 38.03 13679 HOBCO INC RESTORATION OF CUMMINS-GRILL HOUSE 2010.00 13680 HOLb1STEN ICE RINKS INC CONFERENCE-COMMUNITY CENTER 40.00 13681 DONNA HYATT EXPENSES 43.79 13682 HYLAND SKI AREA SKI LESSONS/FEES PAID 2584.00 13683 INGRAM EXCAVATING SERVICE-PARKING LOT/COMMUNITY CENTER 976.50 t3684 I B M OFFICE SUPPLIES 172.80 13685 I B M EQUIPt•1ENT REPAIR-POLICE DEPT 60.00 13686 INTL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOC SUBSCRIPTION-MANAGER 240.00 13687 ICMA BOOK-MANAGER 19.50 - 13688 ICMA BDOK-MANAGER 19.50 13689 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 123.35 13690 CHRIS JESSEN BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 38.00 1369) ELDRED JOHNSON REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 16.00 136 JUSTUS LUMBER CO LUMBER-P/S BUILDING 434.22 13693 KARULF HARDWARE INC -KEYS/RENT RUG DOCTOR/PAINT THINNER/TURF 1392.95 -BUILDER/BRUSHES/WRENClt/PAPER TOWELS/ -ENAMEL/GOGGLES/PAINT/PIPE/BATTERIES/ -HINGES/ROUTER BITS/BRACKETS/SANDPAPER/ -MAUL/SOAP/CAN OPENER/ZIP STRIP/VALVE/ROPE -CONCRETE MIX/VARNISH/STRAPS/SCREWS/GLUE/ FURNACE FILTERS 13694 KELLOGGS LEBODY SHOP INSTRUCTOR/EXERCISE CLASSES/FEES PAID 919.13 13695 KEYS WELL DRILLING CO REPAIR HIGH SERVICE PUMP-WATER DEPT 2175.00 13696 KOKESH ATHLETIC & GOLF SUPPLY BASES/ANCHOR TARPS/BASE STAKES 249.9D 13697 KRAEMERS HOMES CENTER BICYCLE/LADDER/3 SUMP PUMP/PAINT-WATER DPT 677.95 13698 LAKE STATE EQUIPMENT COMPANY REPAIR CLUTCH DISK & ROD HOSE-EQUIP MAINT 495.55 13699 LANCE SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 63.65 13700 M E LANE INC INSURANCE 37.00 13701 LEEF BROS INC RUGS 282.29 13702 LITHO TECHNICAL SERVICES INCORP SERVICE-FORESTRY DEPT 139.00 13703 LOWELLS AUTOMOTIVE SPECIALISTS POLISHING GRINDER-PARK MAINTENANCE 192.10 13704 M P H INDUSTRIES INC TRAFFIC RADAR SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 44.35 13705 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC WINDOW-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 4B.31 137D6 MARKS EDEN PRAIRIE STANDARD BULB-FIRE DEPT 34.93 13707 RANDY MASON HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 510.00 13706 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIPMENT CO INC OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT 49.00 13709 MERIT/JULIAN GRAPHICS ENVELOPES-CITY HALL 509.75 13711 METRO ALARM INC 2N0 QTR 64 ALARM SYSTEM-P/W BLDG 54.00 137114 METRO PONE COMMUNICATIONS INC MAY 84 PAGER RENTAL B9.52 13712 METRO PRINTING INC LETTERHEAD & ENVELOPES-FIRE DEPT 290.00 13676990 103 • • 13713 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMI•MIS JUNE 84 SEWER SERVICE 58910.7i 1 '4 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION BLACKTOP • 1073.3;' 1 i MINNEAPOLIS AREA CHAPTER FILM RENTAL-COMMUNITY CENTER 4.00 13 16 MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE CO EMPLOYMENT ADS-PLANNING & ANIMAL WARDENic 507.30 13717 MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY SERVICE 2383.60 13718 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC SOFTBALL TEAM REGISTRATIONS/FEES PAID 2325.00 13719 MINNESOTA PLAYGROUND INC WARNING SIGN-COMMUNITY CENTER ' 17.76 13720 MINNESOTA TORO INC 0 RING-PARK MAINTENANCE 1.15 13721 MINNESOTA TREE INC TREES-P/S BUILDING 313.80 13722 MODERN TIRE CO WHEEL ALIGNMENT/12 TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINT 544.52 13723 MOTOR PARTS SERVICE INC CARBURATOR/CHOI:E THERMOSTAT-STREET DEPT 100.5/ 13724 MOTOROLA INC 2 DUAL CALL PAGERS-POLICE & STREET DEPT 742.00 13725 MOTOROLA INC 4 DUAL CALL PAGERS & CHARGER-FIRE DEPT 1540.00 13726 MY CHEESE SHOP EXPENSES 28.18 13727 NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION DUES-MAYOR 10.00 13728 NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY GRATE & FRAME-ROUND LAKE PARK 111.85 13729 NORENE NELSON EXPENSES-CUMMIN GRILL HOUSE 297.96 13730 NORTH STAR WATERWORKS PRODUCTS EXTENSIONS-WATER DEPT 688.5? 13731 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO SERVICE-LAVONNE INDUSTRIAL PARK 6463.87 13732 NORTHERN POWER PRODUCTS INC -SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR AUXILIARY 863.61 GENERATING PLANT-CIVIL DEFENSE 13733 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 1366.42 13734 NORTHLAND BUSINESS COMMUNICAITONS REPAIR DICTATION EQUIPMENT-POLICE DEPT 44.00 13735 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 355.10 13736 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MINENSDTA INC PAPER/METAL PRINTWHEEL-PLANNING DEPT 88.45 13737 HARRY H ORTLOFF HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 40.00 1 9 TROY PAPPAS BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 84.00 13LA PLAQUES PLUS INC PLAQUES 37.35 13740 PRIAIRE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC -LIGHTS-FOREST HILLS SKATING RINK/FIXTURES 1503.35 -FLYING CLOUD CONCESSION BLDG/REPAIR DISC -JOCKEY BOARD-COMMUNITY CENTER/REPAIR ALARM SYSTEM-LIQUOR STORE 13741 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN KNOB-STREET DEPT 14.40 L' 13742 R & R SPECIALTIES INC SHARPEN ZAMBONI BLADES-COMMUNITY CENTER 93.10 13743 RADIO SHACK ANSWERING MACHINE TAPES-CITY HALL 42.73 13744 TOM RANDALL HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 45.00 13745 AAGE REFFSGAARD EXPENSES-BUILDING DEPT 15.00 13746 RIDGE DOOR SALES COMPANY OF MINNE REPAIR DOOR-FIRE DEPT 34.45 ff 13747 R1EKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOCIATES I -SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE/CARDINAL 6023.16 CREEK 3RD ADDITION/COUNTY ROAD 67 13748 ROBBINSDALE FARM PETY SUPPLY INC CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 61.65 13749 ROSS SERVICES FLOOR SCRUBBING MACHINE-PARK MAINTENANCE 130.00 13750 RYANS RUMMER STAMPS STAMPS-BUILDING & ENGINEERING DEPT 117.40 13751 WAYNE SANDERS EXPENSES 36.00 13752 SAY ELECTRIC INCORPORATED WIRING-P/S BUILDING 1151.53 13753 LINDA SCIIRUPP REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 32.00 13754 SCOTT CONSTRUCTION INC STREET CRACKFILLER 932.10 13755 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO -STEP LADDER $64.99/SHAPER BLADES $299.99/ 450.17 SMALL TOOLS + 13756 SHAKOPEE FORD INC REPAIR TRANSMISSION/WATER PUMP/RIMS/SEAL 452.77 3. 13757 W GORDON SMITH CO -GREASE/EXHAUST PIPE/MUFFLER/TAIL PIPE/ 3715.67 41 -ANTI-FREEZE/OIL/HOSES/AIR FILTERS/REAR MATS/VALVE/RL:GULAR GAS $3242.00 13758 KEVIN SORENSON HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 56.00 , 9385017 • ..... 1 13759 SPECIALTY SCREENING POLICE BADGE PLAQUES-POLICE DEPT 42.00 1316 STATE OF MINNESOTA TEST SCALES-STREET DEPT 120.00 7813 STATE OF MINNESOTA LICENSE APPLICATIONS-POLICE DEPT 60.00 13c STATE TREASURER FEE-WATER DEPT 15.00 13763 MEG STEVENSON INSTRUCTOR/LAWN & TREE CLASSES/FEES PAID 25.00 13764 DON STREICHER GUNS INC -AMMUNITION/SHOOTING GLASSES/SHOT SHELL 510.60 HOLDERS-POLICE DEPT 13765 JOHN STRETCH REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 8.75 13766 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET BELT/FLYWHEEL/GOVERNOR-EQUIPMENT MAINT 75.03 13767 SULLIVANS SERVICES INC PUMP TANK-RESEARCH ROAD 50.00 13768 SUPIDERLAND INC SERVICE-ROUND LAKE PARK 176.40 13769 SUPPLEE ENTERPRISES INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 2.99 13770 SWEDA INTL INC CASH REGISTER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-C/C 200.00 13771 TOM TESKE REFUND-HYDROSTATIC WEIGHING 7.00 13772 RICHARD W TURNER CONFERENCE-FIRE DEPT 7D.00 13773 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CD OXYGEN-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 7.80 ' 13774 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-POLICE & FIRE DEPT 11347.75 13775 CINDY UNOWSKY INSTRUCTOR/MUSIC FOR VERY YOUNG/FEES PAID 70.00 ' 13776 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE INC GAS CYLINDERS-COMMUNITY CENTER 69.84 13777 VANS PINES INC TREES-FORESTRY DEPT 123.75 13778 VAN WATERS & ROGERS CHLORINE-WATER DEPT 596.25 13779 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO MOVE FIRE SPRINKLER HEADS-P/S BUILDING 550.00 13780 VIKING LABORATORIES INCORPORATED CHLORINE/BICARBONATE OF SODA-C/C 956.75 13781 VOSS ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LIGHT BULBS-P/S BUILDING 48.60 13782 WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY -HYDRANT-FULLER DRIVE/CLAMPS/WASHERS/ 4390.58 GASKETS/GENERATOR-WATER DEPT 137 3 WEAVER ELECTRIC SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER 695.50 13 WEST WELD WELDING RODS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 100.35 137 WESTERN CHEMICAL COMPANY METERING PUMP/TANKS/AGITATORS-WATER DEPT 1695.00 13786 PAT WILSON INSTRUCTOR/VEG GARDENING/FEES PAID 20.00 13787 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 221.29 I3788 ZIEGLER INC EQUIPMENT INSPECTION-EQUIPM MAINT 140.00 13789 ZIEGLER TIRE SERVICE REPAIR FLAT TIRE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 43.00 13790 DANA GIBBS PACKET OELIVERIES 78.00 2251723 • $943008.81 • • It May 15, 1984 Cash Disbursements by Fund Number 10 GENERAL 130893.19 11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT 56946.94 12 CERTIFICATE DEBT FUND 2512.50 15 L/S PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL 36471.24 17 L/S PRESERVE 23929.00 30 CASH PARK FEES 632.72 31 PARK ACOUIST & DEVELOP 2543.21 33 UTILITY BOND FUND 74.22 36 P/S & P/W BOND FUND 2950.27 44 UTILITY DEBT FUND 31463.25 4 UTILITY DEBT FUND ARB 64504.61 5 - IMPROV CONST FUND 9279.47 52 IMPROVE DEBT FUND 20.25 55 IMPROV DEBT FUND ARB 13266.83 57 ROAD IMPROV CONST FD 8467.75 73 WATER FUND 16128.88 77 SEWER FUND 58930.46 81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 281. 48 86 PARK PROGRAMS-CONTRIBUTIO 1810.31 87 COMMUNITY DEVELOP BLOCK G 2351 .79 90 TAX INCREMENT CONST FUND 479550.44 $943008.81 I 111� APR 2 31984 April 20, 1984 Mr. Carl Jullie City Manager Eden Prairie City Hall 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Mr. Jullie; The Eden Prairie Jaycee Women are interested in sponsoring a child- ren:s parade in conjunction with Schooner Days again this year. Therefore we would like to obtain a parade permit. • Our initial plans call for the parade to be held on Friday, June 1, 1984 at 6:00 P.M. The parade route would be from the Eden Prairie Library down Valley View Road to the intersection of Hames Way. We would then bring the children up onto the high school property to award the prizes, etc. This should take a ( maximum of i hour. We would hope to have approximately 75 children participating. We greatly appreciate your assistance in this endeavor. Sincerely, (e'r y1ttltil��', an Forsberg Eden Prairie Jaycee Women 6819 Park View Lane Eden Prairie, Mn 934-8170 I I z M-25 Cq 4 i I May 1, 1984 1 3 I TO: Carl Jullie, City Manager I FROM: Jim Clark, Public Safety 14 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PARADE PERMIT y T E After reviewing the request for a parade permit by the Jaycee Women, I would recommend that permission be granted R for the Children's Parade. The parade would require that we close Valley View Road from County Road 4 to Haines Way for approximately one-half hour. Once the parade passes the entrance to Round Lake, we intend to move the barricade at County Road 4 to that point so as to allow access to Round Lake Park and the Community Center. 0 As you may be aware, last year the Jaycee Women held a similar event at Schooner Days. There were some problems with that parade; i.e. , a significant delay in the starting F time and a last-minute decision to change the route. I talked to Mrs. Forsberg and advised her that if permission was granted for this year, number one, the parade would 1 start on time, and number two, there would be no changes in the route. V Staffing will be accomplished through the use of Police v Reserve Officers, Park Rangers, and regularly scheduled EPublic Safety Officers. If you have any further questions, please call. • JC:sm cc: Director Hacking M E • M 0 H IL 1113 1)N ! LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS • MINNETONKA,EDEN PRAIRIE,HOPKINS AREA LWV-MEPH POSITION ON COMMUNITY PROGRAMMING VIA CABLE TV Adopted January 10, 1984 LWV-MEPH believes that community programming via cable TV is a worthwhile vehicle for providing citizen information, and an appropriate means of expression and participation for citizens. LWV-MEPH supports government policy at all levels that encourages community programming via cable TV. LWV-MEPH supports effective provisions for citizen input into community programming policies and implementation of the franchise. 41 11110 BETTER GOVERN MENT TH ROUGH INFORMED CITIZENS MEMORANDUM_ TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: May 10, 1984 • SUBJECT: Eden Prairie Horsemen Request • At the May 1st Council meeting, the Council reviewed the request of the Eden Prairie Horsemen to have the City grade an area on MAC property for development of a public riding arena. The Council continued the item to the May 15th Council agenda, and requested staff to determine the approximate number of horses boarded in Eden Prairie that are owned by Eden Prairie residents and to contact other cities to determine how many ti other communities have provided this service. The Council also requested staff to "' get further information regarding how other communities handle liability insurance. Minnetonka is the only other community that staff was able to determine that has a public riding arena on public property. The Minnetonka City staff provided the follow- ,'y t, ing information: 1. The11_. riding arena is on City property and operated by the Minnetonka Horscmens Association. •i t 2. The City drags the arena every Friday and mows the grass at the site i. once a week. '• 0 3. The City purchased the lumber for the arena; the Minnetonka Horsemen I arranged to have the site graded and constructed the facility. t 4. The Minnetonka Horsemen Association maintained their own liability 0. insurance for operation of the facility; however, the City also has liability insurance on the facility. 8 S. Minnetonka Horsemen do occasionally request the Council to budget items for improvement at the facility. For example, they may request i the City to purchase a set of bleachers, etc. 3 The Minnetonka staff person contacted estimated that perhaps as much as 85-90% of the 1 users were not. Minnetonka residents, because the majority of the horse shows that •I are scheduled at that facility are open to the public. The initial grading plan submitted by staff for that site estimate) a grading cost of $7,000. Much of this grading was for screening the arena and parking tot with berms, ,fir etc. In order to just grade a flat riding arena site, the gradia;: costs could be IL reduced to around $3,000. The idea Prairie Horsemen Association consisting of approximately 45 families is the organi::ation making this request. Staff requested that they provide the City with an estimate eu the number of Eden Prairie owned Itorses that are hoarded in Eden Prairie and do not have access to a riding arena. Attached to this memo is a memo from the • it:'1 X • -2- Eden Prairie Horsemen dated May 8th that indicates approximately 250 residents in Eden Prairie own horses; of these about fro individuals have access to a riding ring. The Council could indicate support by offering the same services to the Eden Prairie Horsemen that Minnetonka offered to their Horsemen Association. That is to offer the use of the land by entering into the expanded lease agreement with MAC, and paying for fencing materials and committing to maintaining the area, or the Council could agree to the reduced grading plan that would simply level the area for a riding arena and seed the entire site at a total cost to the City for grading and seeding of about $3,500. If the City Council approves the development of a riding arena on that site, the City will not only be responsible for the development and the maintenance of the site, but will also be liable for the operation of the site. The Community Services staff would recommend that the Eden Prairie Horsemen be required to obtain a liability insurance • policy naming the City as co-insured for a minimum of $500,000 bodily injury for participants, as well as spectators. This is the minimum recommendation from our insurance carrier. The Community Services staff would also recommend that the City be required to approve • any horse shows that would be scheduled there, as well as any other special events. This site will have very limited parking, therefore, any horse shows or special events would have to be limited in numbers. BL:md AU • • • • • • 111` TO: Mayor and City Council Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services • 1( FROM: Eden Prairie Horsemen DATE: May 8, 1984 In response to questions raised at the May 1st meeting we respect- fully sutmit the following information: Approximately 250 residents in Eden Prairie own horses. Of these about 60 individuals have access to a riding ring. The total number of horse owners will benefit from a riding ring. Individuals having access to a private ring will still benefit from a public ring because: private rings are extensively used for classes and lessons, and club fun shows would be inconvenient for a private stable to host. 1 We believe the number of horse owning residents will increase in Eden Prairie. This is based upon the Rural lots still available for pur- chase and our discussions with prospective purchasers who intend to keep horses. , Presently about 70 of the horses in Eden Prairie are located i in the southern half of the City in proximity of the ring location. This percentage can be expected to increase as Rural tracts develop. As previously indicated in club correspondence, materials for the tring construction is being obtained by club members. Regarding the cost of improvement to the parking area, years of use • of grass parking in Minnetonka and Plymouth indicate that grass is suitable. Although any work and materials the City can provide will very much be appreciated, please take into consideration that the club intends to assist in both areas. The highest cost estimated by City Staff is for grading work and hopefully this item can be reviewed. Unfortunately I have 2 other meetings scheduled for the night '1 of May 15th, but I will try to show prior to this item being discussed. Other club members will be in attendance . A . • 1 {• Si�.crely, i �� ' ��� • Pat Martell, President Eden Prairie Horsemen • tflc MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council TIIRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Service DATE: May 10, 1984 SUBJECT: Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Draft Master Plan On March 27, 1984, the planning team of Wirth and Associates and Saunders-Thalden Associates made the final presentation to the City Council regarding the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Draft Master Plan. At that meeting, staff requested the City Council to continue a decision on the item pending final input from the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District Board of Managers. The Watershed District Board of Managers did receive a presentation on the plan on March 7th; however, the Board of Managers had many questions of their engineering staff regarding how this plan relates to the water management program, as well as what legal rights the Board of Managers had over review of this type of plan. The Board continued to their April 4th meeting. On April 4, the Board discussed this item and again continu<: this item to their May 2 meeting. On May 2, 1984, the Board of Managers took two separate actions. First of all, the - Board agreed unanimously that they had sufficient opportunity for input to the Purgatory' Creek Recreation Area Master Plan, and secondly that. the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Draft Master Plan appears to meet all of the Watershed District concerns and require- ments regarding setbacks, floodplain storage, etc. with the information available in the existing plans. On April 30th, Mr. l.oesser and Mr. Kontak, of Castle Ridge, met with the Director of Community Services to indicate that Castle Ridge approves of the Purgatory Creek Rec- reation Draft ?aster Plan, and would be willing to donate the floodplain property when the City requests the need for that property. Therefore, of the 12 property owners that own floodplain property, 9 have indicated they are in favor of the plan and 3 property owners have not commented on the plan to date. Those property owners are: the Carmody's, Richard Miller, the owners of the Pceders Property. Lloyd Cherne and the owners of the Eden 100 and 494 Properties are also unwilling to commit to give floodplain at this time. • All of the property owners have a concern as to whether the plan would work lc. how much of the property would he dry through the majority of the year. Presently, the Watershed District has only determined the 100 year flood contour. In order to determine flood levels for 10 and 30 year flood. and therefore predict how much usable floodplain would be available for the park during the majority of the year, the City would have to petition the Watershed District to run the numbers to determine those flood elevations. We've been told that the cost is approximately $8,000 per flood elevation. lf At this time, the Community Services staff requests the City Council to approve the IL (haft. Master Plan. Upon approval of this draft, staff will order theprcymtation of the i final plan, which will have all of the corrections and changes suggested through the • review ln•oce s. The final plan should he distributed within one month. _2_ . Staff sees the following steps necessary prior to beginning development of the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area: 1. City to petition the Watershed District to determine the 10 year and 30 year flood elevations for the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area, as well as the affects upstream and downstream of lowering the flood _ elevation from 824 to 821. 2. City to petition the Watershed District to participate in the portion of this project that will improve basic water management of tho Purgatory Creek Watershed. (If the Board of Managers determine that the project should be undertaken as part of the basic water management features as envisioned in the District's overall plan, the Managers could proceed to authorize the utilization of the annual levy of a tax not to exceed 1/3 • • of a mill for a period of not to exceed 15 consecutive years, funds to be derived therefrom to be used to pay the cost which is attributed to the basic water management features of the entire improvement project set forth in the initiating petition of a municipal.) 3. The City would have to prepare detailed plans and specifications for each phase of the proposed development. • 4. The City would have to receive dedication of all of the land within the floodplain project. 5. The City should begin to set aside approximately $50,000 a year from cash t. park fees in order to match possible Watershed District funding assistance, or possible State and/or Federal grant assistance in order to have sufficient funding to begin this project within several years. In the interim prior to actual development of the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area, the • City should use the Master Plan as a reference when reviewing requests for approval of a particular land use on adjacent property. BL:md 1 i t WH CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST May 15, 1984 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM_) UTILITY INSTALLER A & M Building & Supply, Inc. Harem Plumbing Company Concord Builders •Du-All Service • HEATING & VENTILATING G & R Aircraft Sales, Inc. Merle Nordeen Construction, Inc. Ron Erickson Heating & Air Conditioning The Plumbing Place CONTRACTOR (I & 2 FAMILY) GAS FITTER Gorton Burchard Friederichs Builders Ron Erickson Heating & Air Conditioning Kee Construction, Inc. The Plumbing Place Ken Roelofs Construction, Inc. Zaudtke Home Builders, Inc. TEMPORARY BEER PLUMBING Eden Prairie Lions (Schooner Days) Harem Plumbing Company Gambling Ray Stegora Ga Eden Prairie Lions - see attached (Raffle for Schooner Days) These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. Pat Solie, Licensing 112 _ �. • TO: Mayor and Council FROM: John Frane DATE: 5-11-84 RE: Eden Prairie Lions Club Temporary Gambling License for Schooner Days The Lions Club has requested the City to waive the requirement of a Performance Bond for their Schooner Days gambling license. The State Statutes provide for a waiver by 4/5 vote of the Council. However, our ordinance does not allow a waiver. If the Council wishes to honor this request we should have a first reading of an ordinance providing for a waiver upon a 4/5 vote of the Council. 10_3