Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 03/27/1984 EDEN PRAIRIE • CITY CDUNCIL A(.ENDA IuESDAY, MARCH 27, 1984 7:3D PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIDN BLDG. CDUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Richard Anderson, George • Bentley, Paul Redpath and George Tangen CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie; City Attorney Roger Pauly; Finance Director John Frame; Planning Director Chris Enger; Director of Community Services Robert Lambert; Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael INVOCATION: Councilman Paul Redpath PLEDGE DF ALLEGIANCE • ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND DTHER ITEMS DF BUSINESS II. MINUTES • A. Minutes of the Joint Meeting of the City Council and Planning Page 463 Commission held Tuesday, March 6, 1984 B. Minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, March 6, 1984 Page 464 III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Resolution declaring cost to be assessed, ordering preparation of Page 465 proposed assessment role and setting public hearing date for May 22, 1984 (Resolution No. 8T---T1) B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 58-83, Crescent Ridge, rezoning of Page 467 T6.6 acres from Rural and RT-22 to R1-13.5 and 20 acres from Industrial General and Rural to RM-6.5, with variances, for mixed residential development, Approval of Developer's Agreement, and Adoption of Resolution No. 84-01,approving Summary of Ordinance No. 58-33 and ordering the Publication of Said Summary of Crescent Ridge. location: North of Highway 5 at the western boundary of Eden Prairie. C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 14-84, Primetech, rezoning from Rural Pace 468 to I-2 Park and Office for 20 acres. Approval of Developer's Agreement_ and Adoption of Resolution No. 84-48,_A uroving Summary of Ordinance No. 14-84 and Ordering the Publication of Said Summary. Location: West of Highway 169/212 and northeast of Shady Oak Road. D. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 18-84, Kinder Care Learning Center, Page 46D rezoning from Rural to ( Pentnnal Service and adoption of Re ofrtion No 84 .1 Approving tl `itr Planincsnhject to pecificConditions. Location: Northeast quadrant of Singletree a Lane and Glen Lane. City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,March 27, 1984 E. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 19-84, Edenvale Apartments, 2nd Page 471 Addition_rezoning_from Rural to RM-2.5, and adoption of Resolution No. 84-50, approving Site Plan subject to Specific Conditions. Location: Northeast quadrant of Baker Road and Vatley View Road. F. Approval of Developer's Agreement for PUD concept review for mixed Page 473 residential�d uses on 150 acres for 525 units for Red Rock Ranch by Robert Mason Homes and developer's agreement G. Change Order 42, Creekridge Estates (Brookview Circle at CSAH Page 474 I.C. 52-040 H. Receive feasibility report and set April 17, 1984 as public Page 475 hearing date for sewer and water improvements to serve the Carmel Development and vicinity, I.C. 52-059A Resolution No. 84-58) I. Receive feasibility report and set April 17, 1984 as public Page 476 ling date for street and utility improvements to serve Bryant Lake Office Tech Center and vicinity, I.C. 52-053 (Resolution No. 84-59) J. Final Plat approval for Arbor Glen 2nd Addition (Resolution No. 84- Page 477 60) K. Final Plat approval for Preserve Commercial Park North, 2nd Page 480 Addition (Resolution No. 84-61) L. Final Plat approval for Paulsen's Addition (Resolution No. 84-62) Page 483 M. Final Plat approval for Carmel (Resolution No. 84-63) Page 486P, N. Final Plat approval for City West Second Addition (Resolution No. Page 489 [34-65T 0. Approval of Recommended Agreement with IUOE, Local No. 49, for Page 492 Calendar Years 1I984 and 1 85 P. Approval of 18-month Extension of Renewal Date for Developer's Page 501 Agreement for Sheraton Inn-(Paul Thomas Q. Accept bids for Staring Lake Trail Development, Phase II Page 502 R. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 3-84, amending City Code Chapter 1 Page 420 S. 2nd Reating of Ordinance No. 4-84, amending City Code Chapter 2 Page 424 T. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 5-84, amending City Code Chapter 3 Page 426 U. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 6-84, amending City Code Chapter 4 Page 429 V. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 7-84, amending. City Code Chapter 5 Page 433 :• W. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 9-84, amending City cede Chapter 7 Page 437 X. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 10-84, amending City Code Chapter 8 Page 438 City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,March 27, 1984 Y. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 11-84, amendi a City Code Chapter 9 Page 503 Z. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 12-84, amending City Code Chapter 10 Page 440 AA. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 13-84, amending City Code Chapter 12 Page 443 BB. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 20-84, amending City Code Chapter 11 Page 409 CC. Clerk's License List Page 505 DD. Set Public Hearing date of April 17, 1984 for Tax Increment Financing District No. 7 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. EXTENSION OF 66TH STREET AND ST. JOHN'S DRIVE WITH THE TANAGER Page 506 CREEK SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS B. PRAIRIE CENTER BUSINESS PARKA)! Opus Corporation. Request for Page 284 Planned Unit Development Concept for 17.4 acres for three office/ warehouse buildings. Location: Southeast quadrant of West 78th Street and Prairie Center Drive. (Resolution No. 84-34 - PUD Concept Approval) Continued from March 6, 1984 C. REQUEST FOR MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BONDS IN THE AMOUNT Page 510 DF 1,20D,OOO.00 FOR VALLEY PACE OFFICES ASSOCIRTESTResolution No. 84-36) D. VALLEY VIEW MANOR HOMES by Sunrise Properties. Request for Page 514 Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 and Preliminary Plat of 20 acres for 112 units in 14 condominium buildings. Location: North of Valley View Road, 1/4 mile east of Mitchell Road. (Ordinance No. 21-84 - zoning; Resolution No. 84-51 - preliminary plat) E. PAULSEN'S 2ND ADDITION by Dirlam Development. Request for Zoning Page 531 District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 for 6.3 acres and Preliminary Plat of 6.3 acres into 18 single family lots. Location: North of C.M. St. Paul and Pacific Railroad, south of Hidden Ponds Park. (Ordinance No. 22-84 - rezoning; Resolution No. 84-52 - preliminary plat) • F. GONYEA 3RD ADDITION. Request for Planned Unit Development District Page 540 Review and zoning fromm, Rural to R1-13.5, with possible variances, for 9.22 acres, and from Rural to R1-9.5, with possible variances, for 3.85 acres; and Preliminary Plat of 37.19 acres into 33 residential lots and five outlets. Location: Northeast quadrant of State Highway P5 and County Road #4. (Ordinance No. 23-84 - zoning; Resolution No. 84-53 - preliminary plat) G. WELSH OFFICE PLAT. Request for Preliminary Plat of 4.72 acres Page 551 for'tiro lotti. location: Northeast corner of Prairie Center Drive and West 78th Street. (Resolution No. 84-55 - preliminary plat) V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 12634 - 12939 Page 555 VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS City Council Agenda - 4 - Tues.,March 27, 1984 T VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. DOUGLAS INDUSTRIAL PARK by Douglas Skanse. Request for Preliminary Page 563 Mt and Final Plat of 5.9 acres for two lots for I-5 use. Location: Northwest quadrant of Washington Avenue and Valley View Road. (Resolution No. 84-54 - preliminary plat; Resolution No. 84-64 - final plat) B. PRESERVE COMMERCIAL PARK NORTH 3RD ADDITION by Eden Prairie Page 570 Car Care Center. Request for Preliminary Plat of 2.8 acres for Car Care Center. Location: Northwest quadrant of Prairie Center Drive and Highway #169. (Resolution No. 84-56 - preliminary plat) C. Request by Hennepin County for Approval of new location for Leaf Page 579 Composting Operation VIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members B. Report of City Manager C. Report of City Attorney D. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Five-year Capital Improvement Program for Eden Prairie Parks Page 582 and Open Space 2. Bryant Lake Surface Water Use Ordinance Page 587 3. Community Ed/Recreation Duplication Page 591 4. Approval of plans for North Star Addition Page 599 5. Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Draft Master Plan Page 605 6. Tax Forfeited Lands Page 607 IX. NEW BUSINESS X. ADJOURNMENT. UNAPPROVED MINUTES JOINT MEETING EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, MARCH 6, 1984 6;30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang H, Penzel, Richard Anderson George Bentley, Paul Redpath & George Tangei PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chairman William Bearman, Virginia Gartner, Bob Hallett, Stan Johannes, Dennis Marhula, Edward Schuck and Hakon Torjesen CITY STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Planning Direc- tor Chris Enger, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz and Recording Secretary Karen Michael I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Wolfgang H, Penzel. II. ITEMS O.F. DISCUSSION Planning Director Enger reviewed what might constitute an office/service use according to present criteria being developed by the Planning Staff. He noted the differences being requested now with more office space being requested with- in what had been generally regarded an industrial use. He indicated the high tech use which has been requested in Eden Prairie has had varying ratios of commercial/office/industrial uses. Enger discussed the various rationale behind the requests. Enger reviewed the existing office/service (high tech) character- istics: height of building; ratio of exterior perimeter wall to building foot- age; ratio of lineal feet of wall with windows to total perimeter wall area; percentage of building finished initially with floor coverings, wall coverings, and ceiling; percentage of building initially with heating, ventilating and air conditioning; exterior material; parking; service area doors; building size; landscaping; bay depth average; building details; mechanical equipment; percent- age of building with a two-story office element; and the type of building. He suggested that proposals could be reviewed based on these characteristics and he will provide the Council and Commission with further information. Enger also noted that the present square footage of office and commercial space had been reviewed along with potential square footages of office space based on a recent real estate study -- this showed that Eden Prairie would absorb spec office land within ten years. Enger said that the office space which is available in Eden Prairie is prime office space and should be retained as office. He said that he hoped the remaining industrial areas in Eden Prairie could be developed to their highest use -- and this might be office/service. Joint Council/Commission Minutes -2- March 6, 1984 Redpath asked if it was appropriate to look at proposals with respect to their relationship to the Major Center Area. Enger said he thought this was valid. Tangen said he had voted against the last proposal for City West because he felt warehouses (high tech) were a lesser use than what had origin- ally been intended and he thought an office use was preferable. Bentley asked if these ideas should be put together in a format to provide another zone. Enger said what has been presented tonight is the beginning of that process. In the next few weeks other projects will be coming before the Planning Commission and the City Council which will be measured against the criteria as presented; this will give further indication as to whether or not another zone is needed. Anderson asked how long it would take for the Planning Staff to draft stan- dards which would then come through the Planning Commission to the Council which would indicate what high tech is. Bentley said there should be certain minimum standards and once a project was below a certain number of points it would no longer be eligible for consideration. Enger said it is possible to come up with a definition relatively quickly. He questioned whether the characteristics of a zone that would be acceptable to the City would respond to development requests. In other words, would the zone be used? Bearman suggested we look at what we don't want in an industrial zone and go from there. The consensus was that Staff will be directed to develop information and a proposal for the Commission and the Council on the office/service use based on tonight's discussion. Enger said he would provide the Planning Commission and City Council with the materials which were presented tonight relative to ranking proposals. Bearman suggested that perhaps the Commission and the Council should take a look at criteria for determing a Guide Plan change. He said he felt there is a need for more substantive reasons for making changes including a check list. III. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MARCH 6, 1984 7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Paul Redpath & George Tangen CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Planning Director Chris Enger, Director of Community Services Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael INVOCATION: Councilman George Bentley PRESENTATION OF COLORS AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Blue Bird Club ROLL CALL: all members were present. Mayor Penzel presented members of the Third Grade Blue Bird Club with a Proclamation indicating the week of March I8th as Camp Fire birthday week in Eden Prairie. He thanked leaders Barb Bergan and Wendy Nelson for having their Club participate tonight. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following item was added to the Agenda: IX. B. 2. Review of Water Samples. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Agenda and Other Items of Business as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1984 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to approve the Minutes of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, February 2I, 1984, as published. Motion carried unanimously. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List B. 2nd Reading of PUD Ordinance No. 01-84, Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for 43.3 acres, with variances, approval of Developer's Agreement for Carmel Addition, and adoption of Resolution No. 19-84, approving Summary of PUD ordinance No 01-84 and ordering publication of said Summary of Carmel. Location:nort�i of Rowland Road, west of Old Shady Oa1Road. City Council Minutes -2- March 6, 1984 C. Receive 100% petition for public improvements in Phase I of Carmel Addition and authorize preparation of p ans and specifications, I.C. 52-0598 (Reso- ( Tution Tlo. 84-43 D. Receive petition for sewer and water extension to serve Carmel Addition and vicinity and du-Morrie preparation of a feasibility report, I.C. 52-059A lResolution No. 84-42) E. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 16-84, zoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and adop- tion of Resolution No. 84-40, setting conditions of approving Development Plan for Vernon Hill Estates by Countryside Investments, Inc. Location: southeast quadrant of Duck Lake Trail and County Road 4, F. Award bids for playground equipment at Red Rock Park and High Trail Estates G. Receivepetition for Sanitary Sewer Improvements to serve Paulsen's 1st Addition, T.C. 52-061 (Resolution No. 84-47) H. Final plat approval for Lake Heights Addition (Resolution No. 84-46) I. Authorize City Manager and Mayor to execute agreement with MWCC regarding easements MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve items A - I on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried with Bentley abstaining on item "B." IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. PRAIRIE CENTER BUSINESS PARK by Opus Corporation. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept for 17.4 acres for three office/warehouse buildings. Location: southeast quadrant of West 78th Street and Prairie Center Drive. (Resolution No. 84-34 - PUD Concept Approval) - continued from February 21, 1984. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to continue this item to the March 27, 1984, Meeting of the City Council. Motion carried unanimously. B. FEASIBILITY REPORT on signals at Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive, I.C. 52-057 (Resolution No. 84-45) City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published and property owners within the area had been notified. Director of Public Works Dietz addressed the proposal and reviewed the rationale for assessing this project in this manner. Dietz also called attention to the letter distributed this evening from the Dvoraks regarding their portion of the assessment. (copy attached.) 1 City Council Minutes -3- March 6, 1984 Redpath asked about assessing the properties west of TH 169. Dietz explained that studies have shown most of the trips are into or out of the area which is included in the preliminary assessment. Penzel asked if a similar signal project were to be proposed for the area west of TH 169, would the assessment be to the properties west of TH 169? Dietz said that might be probable. Redpath asked if there were any possibility of County involvement in the cost of the proposed signals. Dietz said the County portion of the road stops at TH 169 and the rest of the road belongs to the City so it is very unlikely. Tangen asked about the timing of the signals at this location. Dietz said it would be a vehicle actuated intersection. There were no comments from the audience. The Dvorak's letter was referred to the Special Assessment Hearing. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to close the Public Hearina and to adopt Resolution No. 84-45, ordering improvements and preparation of plans and specifications for traffic signals at Flying Cloud Drive and Shady Oak Road (I.C. 52-057). Motion carried unanimously. C. VILLAGE GREENS by Kerr Companies. Request for Site Plan Zoning Amendment for 122 condominium units on 12.84 acres and preliminary plat of 12.84 acres into two (2) lots. Location: northwest quadrant of Valley View Road and Golf View Drive. (Ordinance No. 17-84 - Site Plan Zoning Amend- ment and Resolution No. 84-37 - preliminary plat) City Manager Jullie indicated notice of this Public Hearing had been publi- shed and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified. Bob Martinson representing the Kerr Companies noted the various consultants who have assisted with the project including Richard Martin, architect; Herb Baldwin, landscape architect; Hansen, Thorp, Pellinen & Olson, engin- eers for the project; traffic consultation by BRW; and Jerry Peletier, contractor. Martinson addressed the proposal and noted that this condo- minium project will have a base of $64,000 for a 950 square foot unit and at the highest end, a large townhouse of 1350 square feet, will have a base price of $76,500. Ralph Clair, BRW, reported on the traffic study which had been conducted. Planning Director Enger said the Planning Commission had reviewed the final revised form of this proposal at its meetings on January 9, 1984, January 23, 1984, and February 27. 1984. He noted that this had come before the Planning Commission as a different townhouse project in October of 1983; that proposal was withdrawn. At its meeting on January 23rd the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the site plan and zoning amendment based upon the plans dated January 16 and 18, 1984, subject to the recommendations included in the Staff Report dated January 20, 1984, and the recommendations of the Commission. City Council Minutes -4- March 6, 1984 Director of Community Services Lambert stated the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission had reviewed this request at its February 6, 1984, meeting at which time it voted to recommend approval subject to the recommendations included in the Planning Staff Report dated January 20, 1984. The main concern of the Commission was the tot lot and the connection of the trail system. Redpath asked if it would be more beneficial to have the evergreens planted prior to Phase IV. Enger said it would be best during the initial construction. Anderson inquired about the distance between this proposal and the residences to the northeast. Martinson said the backs of the houses are about 35 or 40 feet from the property line. Anderson noted he had not seen any reference to the trail easement which runs through this property. Martinson said he was only aware of a trail proposal, but was not aware that there was anything which had been formalized. Anderson reviewed what he recalled of the easement. Penzel suggested this be checked prior to 2nd Reading of the Ordinance. Anderson said the easement was on land owned by Edenvale. Bentley said great care is taken to prevent single family housing within a subdivision from being repetitious but has this been done in this project? He expressed concern that this would have an institutional look if similar procedures were not followed. Enger said there is a very fine line between compatibility and variety when it comes to projects of this type. He said the building elevations in this project provide variety. Bentley noted the condition of Valley View Road and the need for upgrading because of this project. Redpath said he felt that Shadow Green should be included in any discussions relative to the upgrading of Valley View Road. Penzel said he felt improvements should extend to Fairway Drive on the west. Penzel recommended Staff be directed to resolve the extension of Valley View Road to Fairway Drive prior to 2nd Reading. Redpath asked where snow would he placed when removed and where dogs would be walked. Martinson said there would be a public sidewalk where dogs could be walked -- a green strip of 5 - 6 feet is between the sidewalk and the street. He indicated these are both management problems which will have to be dealt with by the homeowner's association. Bentley stated the Planning Department should be concerned with whether or not storm shelters are provided. He said he would like to see this made a part of the review. Redpath said free standing sheds are not allowed in residential areas and he inquired as to why free standing garages were being allowed in this instance. Enger said it was his understanding that the garages would be on lots and would be purchased as a part of the units and the maintenance would be provided by the homeowner's association. He felt the garages would help to provide some scale to the project. City Council Minutes -5- March 6, 1984 There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 17-84, rezoning. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No. 84-37, approving the preliminary plat of Village Greens for the Kerr Companies and directing Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement taking into account the recommendations included in the Staff Report, those of the Commissions and those of the Council including consideration of color schemes based on a range of colors to be presented prior to 2nd Reading and plantings to be completed prior to Phase IV. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to direct Staff to prepare a recommendation as to upgrading Valley View Road west to Fairway Drive. Motion carried unanimously. D. KINDER CARE LEARNING CENTER. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to Commercial Regional Service and preliminary plat of 0.71 acres for a Day Care Facility. Location: northeast quadrant of Singletree Lane and Glen Lane. (Ordinance No. 18-84 - Zoning District Change and Resolu- tion No. 84-38 - preliminary plat) City Manager Jullie said notice of this Public Hearing had been published and property owners within the project vicinity had Leen notified. Bob Fors, representing the proponent, spoke to the request. He noted that Kinder Care has met all of the recommendations put forth by the Planning Commission except for the hip roof. Director of Planning Engler stated this had been reviewed by the Planning Commission at its February 13, 1984, meeting at which time the Commission had voted to approve the project subject to the recommendations included in the Staff Report dated February 10, 1984. He said that some of the recommendations, based on action by the Planning Commission, were to be revised prior to action by the City Council -- and he noted that the cupola has been removed but the hip roof remains. This request was not reviewed by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission. Bentley said he could see nothing wrong with the bell tower or the roof as shown -- the first Kinder Care building has these and we should be consistent within the City. He said he thought having the cupola, as long as it was the same color as the roof, was alright. Tangen said all flat roofs in this area might not be a good thing. He said he felt this was a relatively attractive type of structure. Tangen said he would recommend doing away with the cupola. Redpath said in the negotiations with the Area "G" people the City did not make many concessions; he would go along with the hip roof for Kinder Care as long as there was no cupola. City Council Minutes -6- March 6, 1984 There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 18-84, zoning district change. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No. 84-38, approving the preliminary plat of Kinder Care Learning Center and to direct Staff to prepare a Summary Resolution per the recommendations of the Planning Commission and Staff and noting that a hip roof with no cupola is permitted. Motion carried unanimously. E. EDENVALE APARTMENTS 2ND ADDITION by Bar-ett Construction Co./Edenvale Apartments Partnership. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Medium to High Density Residential and Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5 for 4.98 acres for a 70-unit apartment building. Location: northeast quadrant of Baker Road and Valley View Road. (Resolution No. 84-39 - Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and Ordinance No. 19-84 - zoning) City Manager Jullie said official notice of this Public Hearing had been published and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified. Ron Erickson, architect for Bar-Ett Construction, addressed the proposal. Planning Director Enger stated the Planning Commission had reviewed this request at its February 13, 1984, meeting at which time it voted to recommend approval subject to the conditions outlined in the February 10, 1984, Staff Report. Enger noted that the requested changes are reflected in the mater- ials submitted to the City Council. Director of Community Resources Lambert said the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission had reviewed this proposal at its March 5, 1984, meeting at which time it voted to recommend approval subject to the conditions included in the Staff Report dated February 10, 1984. Anderson asked when the park in this area is scheduled for improvements. Lambert indicated that of the 40 acres of park land only 4 acres is useable. He said fill is needed and it will be about two years before improvements are begun. Bar-ett Construction indicated a willingness to provide fill. Penzel asked about provisions for storm shelter. Erickson said the basement garage will provide very adequate shelter for residents. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to close the Public Hearing and to adopt Resolution No. 84-39, amending the Comprehensive Municipal Plan. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes -7- March 6, 1984 MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 19-84, zoning. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to direct Staff to prepare a Summary Resolution per Commission and Staff recommendations noting the proponents willingness to provide fill (any excess from this site) for the adjacent City Park. Motion carried unanimously. F. 1984 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT, YEAR X. A Public Hearing to obtain the views of citizens on local and urban Hennepin County housing and community development needs and to provide citizens with the oppor- tunity to comment on the Urban Hennepin County Statement of Objectives/ 1984, and the City of Eden Prairie's proposed use of Year X Urban Henne- pin County Community Development Block Grant Funds. City Manager Jullie indicated notice of this Public Hearing had been published and notices had been mailed to local churches and community organizations as well as being posted on various bulletin boards through- out the community. Jullie noted the February 25, 1984, memorandum from Steve Durham, Assistant Planner, which outlined the proposed program. Jullie reviewed the proposed activities for Year X. Bentley asked if the City had looked into the cost of lights on the top of emergency vehicles which would activate traffic signals. Jullie said he had received a memorandum regarding this from Public Safety and he recalled that the cost was fairly prohibitive especially on a cost/benefit basis. Bentley said the City has banked a considerable amount of the funds each year for site acquisition for housing for low income and elderly people. He said he was under the impression that more dollars would be made avail- able by the Federal Government and that did not seem to be the case at this time. Redpath said he has spoken with some developers who have come up with plans for moderate income rental housing if they were to get a break in the land costs. Planning Director Enger said the City is operating under a 1978 goal of 160 elderly units. He said since 1974 he would be willing to guess that the vast majority of CDBG funds have been spent on parks -- as much as $200,000. He reviewed the history of the Edendale Housing Development in relation to CDBG funds. Enger said $80,000 has been banked; $47,00D for this year. He noted there is a developer interested in providing 100 units which may be more toward the moderate range and would be two bedroom units. He said he felt the City is proceeding well with the plan it had laid out. Bentley said he would like to have the lights for activating traffic signals looked at again. Susan Hustad, 9006 Neil Lake Drive, asked if the City had looked at providing a rental subsidy rather than underwriting the land costs or providing a tax abatement for the elderly rather than a direct subsidy. Enger said these are being investigated; the Federal government has rules which prohibit a direct approach. Y r City Council Minutes -8- March 6, 1984 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public • Hearing and to authorize submission as per Staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. G. AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 11 OF THE CITY COOE (Ordinance No. 20-84) City Manager Jullic said notice of this Public Hearing had been published. He indicated that a Public Hearing is required in connection with any changes the Council makes in Chapter 11, which covers zoning requirements. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to close the Public Hearing and to give 1st Reading to Ordinacne No. 20-84, amending Chapter 11 of the City Code. Motion carried unanimously. V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 12410 - 12633 MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Payment of Claims Nos. 12410 - 12633. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Redpath, Tangen and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS There were no reports. VII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 3-84, amending City Code Chapter 1 MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 3-84, amending City Code Chapter 1. Motion carried unanimously. B. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 4-84, amending City Code Chapter 2 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 4-84, amending City Code Chapter 2. Motion carried unanimously. • C. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 5-84, amending City Code Chapter 3 MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Bentley, to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 5-84, amending City Code Chapter 3. Motion carried unanimously. D. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 6-84, amending City Code Chapter 4 MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 6-84, amending City Code Chapter 4. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes -9- March 6, 1984 E. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 7-84, amending City Code Chapter 5 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 7-84, amending City Code Chapter 5. Motion carried unanimously. F. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 8-84, amending City Code Chapter 6 This item was removed from the Agenda because if was not necessary. G. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 9-84, amending City Code Chapter 7 MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 9-84, amending City Code Chapter 7. Motion carried unanimously. H. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 10-84, amending City Code Chapter 8 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 10-84, amending City Code Chapter 8. Motion carried unanimously. I. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 11-84, amending City Code Chapter 9 City Attorney Pauly called attention to the fact that the amendments to Chapter 9 are now in two parts and should be combined prior to 2nd Reading. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 11-84, amending City Code Chapter 9, as amended. Motion carried unanimously. J. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 12-84, amending City Code Chapter 10 MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Anderson, to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 12-84, amending City Code Chapter 10. Motion carried unanimously. K. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 13-84, amending City Code Chapter 12 MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 13-84, amending City Code Chapter 12. Motion carried unanimously. L. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 21-84, amending City Code Chapter 20 This item was removed from the agenda because it was not necessary. {l, ti City Council Minutes -10- March 6, 1984 VIII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Request from Welsh Construction Corp. for amendment to "Declaration of Restrictions" for Bryant Lake Technical Center City Manager Jullie noted a March 1, 1984, memorandum from Chris Enger, Planning Director, regarding the restrictive covenants for Bryant Lake Office/Tech Center. He said Welsh had expressed concern regarding the restrictive covenants for their Bryant Lake Office/Tech Center which they felt were more limiting than those imposed on the Ryan Construction project (see letter dated February 16, 1984, from Dennis J. Doyle, Welsh Construc- tion.) Dennis Doyle reviewed the differences between the restrictions placed on the Welsh Bryant Lake Technical Center and those on the Ryan project. He indicated it would be easier to finance his project if there were fewer limitations. He said he thought a bad precedent was being set. Penzel asked Doyle to define high tech. Doyle said they are now building buildings with lower ceiling heights, quality interior finishing, air con- tioning in warehouses with a higher usage of office to warehouse -- this would, to him, be high tech -- the occupants lean more toward service and high technology use. Redpath said he felt because the Welsh project was closer to the Major Center Area these restrictions were justified. Redpath asked if Doyle would be willing to discard dock high doors from his project since it abuts an office use and a proposed hotel -- higher uses than those in the vicinity of the Ryan project. Doyle said he felt they are doing a good job in screen- ing the loading areas and there are no sight lines into these areas. Bentley said when the Ryan project was reviewed the Council stated that a precedent was not being set. The Ryan proposal was approved on its own merit and was found to have some unique features. Bentley said he did not feel it was fair for a developer to compare projects since each project is reviewed by the Council and considered on its own based on criteria such as proximity to the Major Center Area. Doyle said it was not his intent to have less than 40% office use, but he felt that the covenants placed him were unfair since he was going after the same tenants as Ryan is; financing is more of a problem with the restrictions placed on the project. Penzel said the issue of comparability is not one that he felt compelled to look at. Penzel said he felt Welsh should look at the agreements which were agreed to and which were between the City and Welsh and no one else; they were not done under duress. He did not feel the City should amend this set of restrictions. Tangen said the City should be willing to look at a specific proposal in regard to an amendment of amendments to the covenants; until the time there is a specific proposal, the City should do nothing. Redpath asked if Doyle was talking about the percentave of office or if he was talking about use of the balance of the building, Doyle said he had as much or more of a problem with some of the other parts of the proposal -- he then indicated that the Developer's Agreement had not been ( executed. Penzel asked City Attorney Pauly if this could be so. Enger City Council Minutes -11- March 6, 1984 recalled that one copy had been executed with the promise that the other executed copies would be forthcoming from Welsh and Hustad. Penzel said, from his perspective, that was the last building permit issued on this project; he said he felt the City had been misled if this is the case. Susan Hustad noted what signatures had been required and the problems which had arisen due to the death of one of the people involved. Staff was directed to look into this situation. Doyle asked to withdraw his request at this time to possibly put it in a different form at a later date. He thanked the Council for its time. Penzel said he felt Tangen's suggestion had merit whereby the Council would look at the details of a specific proposal. Redpath concurred; he said the Council does not wish to give carte blanche approval. Ander- son said, in recalling the proposals, he would consider the Welsh proposal to be in a more sensitive area due to its proximity to Bryant Lake. He did not feel the two projects could be compared because of that. Hustad said the reason for tonight's request was because all the way through the Welsh project and the Ryan project had been compared. She said they were told they would have the same covenants. Penzel said that while there might have been some comparison, each project is judged on its own merit. He noted that what goes into a Developer's Agreement is determined by the Council and what preceeds that are only recommendations from Staff and the Commissions and may or may not be accepted by the Council. B. Preserve Commercial Park North 2nd Addition by The Preserve of Eden Prairie. Request for preliminary plat of 6.75 acres for 4 lots. Location: north- west quadrant of 169 and Prairie Center Drive. (Resolution No. 84-41 - preliminary plat) City Manager Jullie indicated the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing regarding this platting request on February 27th at which time it voted to recommend approval. Harold Peterson, representing The Preserve, spoke to the request. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No. 84-41, approving the Preliminary Plat of Preserve Commercial Park North 2nd Addition. Motion carried unanimously. IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members Penzel - asked Enger to review progress on the Rowland Road sector. Enger explained that Staff had developed a "blob map" indicating what might be in the various areas and also indicated low areas which will not be developable. Redpath said City help was requested by the residents at the last meeting and he wondered what role Brauer was going to play. Enger said he would tell them whether or not this was reasonable and then he could develop more specific plans. City Council Minutes -12- March 6, 1984 L. F. Uherka, 6301 Shady Oak Road, asked when the road connection would be made across their property. Enger said that would be done in the near future. Redpath said he would hope the ridge along the west side of Old Shady Oak Road would not be disturbed. Anderson asked if density transfers might be considered. Enger said this is a possibility, but it would be premature to determine where this might occur. Tangen said he was impressed with what was shown. Enger said this was the first time it had been presented. Director of Public Works Dietz said the feasibility report for the improvements in this area will come before the Council on March 27, 1984. Bentley asked if there was enough of a consensus to put this area into a PUD. Enger said he did not know. Bentley said he would like the residents to know the Council would be willing to listen to their unique ways of coming up with plans for this area to preserve as much of it as possible. Redpath said perhaps the map presented by Enger could be used for a Guide Plan change. Hans Hagen, developer, said that would be helpful when it comes time for them to market their development because prospective buyers always wish to know what is going to go in around them. Penzel said if the neighbors are interested perhaps the Council could give consideration to adopting this concept. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to refer this matter to the Planning Commission and the Public Hearing process for review by the neighbors. Motion carried unanimously. Bentley_ - noted the problems with the berm behind Fieldcrest Road residences. He said there may be documented cases in this area of reduced property values due to the berm Staff was instructed to investigate the problems with the owners of the business park. Tangge: - commended Director of Public Works Dietz for his report on snow- plowing and noted the good performance with snowplowing during the storm this past weekend. Anderson - said he wondered if it was worthwhile for the City to continue to put in trails when they are only useable 50% of the time. He noted trails and sidewalks in the area in which he lives where there are problems -- these are heavily used and not always plowed. Tangen suggested perhaps the City needs a machine which would just be used to clear trails. City Council Minutes -13- March 6, 1984 B. Report of City Manager 1. Discussion of Section 2.3 of the Fee Resolution, regarding fees for dances, shows and live music City Manager Jullie recommended that this matter be referred back to Staff for the purpose of incorporating Sections 5.31 and 5.32 of the City Code into one common section, covering both shows and dances; and that the $400.00 license fee be waived for an event sponsored by a school, church, or bona fide non-profit community organization; and also that all licensed restaurants would be exempt as well as promotional events for bona fide commercial purposes. The intent would be to impose a fee only on those spontaneous type house parties and field parties which attract literally hundreds of sometimes unruly guests and thereon impose a substantial burden on our Public Safety Department. There was discussion as to what constitutes a private party. MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to refer this matter back to Staff for further recommendations. Motion carried unani- mously. 2. Review of Water Samples City Manager Jullie reviewed the recent water sample reports regarding the nitrate level in the water at Riverview and Miller Springs. Penzel suggested samples be replicated, that this be monitored and that the samples be taken often and, if necessary, the area should be posted. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to continue the meeting beyond the 11:30 p.m. deadline. Motion carried unanimously. Staff was directed to monitor the situation via testing. C. Report of City Attorney 1. City Attorney Pauly reported he had sent a letter regarding the bee problem to the complaintant. 2. Noted that only one polling place is allowed per precinct. Pauly was directed to look into what the law requires regarding the size of precincts and the division of precincts. City Council Minutes -14- March 6, 1984 D. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Lions Club Proposal Director of Community Services Lambert called attention to his memoran- dum of February 27, 1984, in which the proposal regarding the Eden Prairie Lions Club proposal for parking lot improvements at Round Lake Park was discussed. Bentley asked what the cost would be. Lambert said approximately $6,DOD. Redpath said as things are now there are electrical cords all over the place; generators are loaned the Lions by Nan Corporation. He said this would help not only the Schooner Days but also it would help with the parking problem. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to authorized acceptance of the Lions Club proposal regarding improvements for the parking lot. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Redpath, Tangen and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. X. NEW BUSINESS Penzel called attention to the memo regarding the Reserve Fund which had been sent to Council members. He asked if the Council wished to hear from the three proponents regarding the Reserve Fund System. Redpath said he would like to hear their presentations. Tangen said would pending Federal legislation have a bearing on when the Council should hear about this. The consensus was this was a good idea. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to have a Special Meeting of the City Council at 7:30 p.m., on Thursday, March 15, 1984, in Room 5 of the School Administration Building to hear proposals regarding the establishment of a Reserve Fund System. Motion carried unanimously. XI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to adjourn the meeting at 12:05 a.m. Motion carried uanimously. • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 84-57 RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED ANO ORDERING PREPARATION OF 1984 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLS ANO SETTING HEARING GATE • WHEREAS, contracts have been let for the following listed improvements and the total project cost, including expenses incurred, or to be incurred and the City's share, exclusive of that assignable to City property, are established as shown on the attached Exhibit A. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE: 1. The cost of such improvements to be specially assessed are hereby declared to be those as set forth in Exhibit A. 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be assessed for each improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the office of the Deputy City Clerk for public inspection. 3. A hearing shall be held on the 22nd day of May, 1984, in the School Board Room, 8100 School Road, South Entrance, at 7:30 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessments and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessments. 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessments to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of record of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. AOOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on March 27, 1984. • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST SEAL John O. Franc, Clerk 0 { U . U) LaJ VI O O n CO O O . N K) O N 4.0 O CO N M 0 V CO CO 4) Cy O C9 N Co 40 M CON p M a O CO I- CT In CO a CV .-• PI I-- IA w VIw w W w w z C) 0 • 2 Q Vs 0 CO .•. CCOO 00 Z O • LO Cr)4. Cs.: Cr) .( CMU' O - N N -.-• n U w •01 44 401 w • VI I-- Cr) F- O . N T O O 7 V) r• O CVCVMr to O (V 41 O N N V O 1 N 10 O M 40 N 4-1 CO Cn cA W JQ en O In n •r• 01 CV C) 01 Cr)N 0 O Lc) ),C, Lc) Cr) ~-. < I- CM • 4) w w w w w W w CO J a E _ ') a) W W I L C ) a E E CU id N • oc m� ro a L O ••)E CC S. OD E O. N L 400.- C 1-4 a.) a E rw rov) v a v 43 O E rod W .V .O Cu 0 • IA VI Y C L 4 TN 0 a-, c Cu 4-4-.O 0 c C)C to 0 C > 0 Oro VI ro 0 ro U E C CO' C E L O CO.Y E 6 a EE f• ro N J E VI E E•sr E Cl E 3 C C.-3 OO 43 3 43X L L•V co E.... )- b :v IV IA 4-) CC) (U E 3 3 c L ul ea ro > . O o C ..ro O) aw S. 0 • 0L 0 L.0 0 L 3 ro � EY �U • 3.a RI E a 3 0 vs L•O 0+ E ro CVVS Cr E Cr N CL) 3 Cr) Cl) 0 C) POl F- M N 2 el C �t Cl)••- C) N 0 V) ..C_Y I./1IAC 3 1/1U C7 0 0 O 3 5- 0 O C U 0 O E co I T C I E.X I >, ro I >,O E Cl) , C 6) IV L 0 N O• CV IA U.S CM L T.) Cu ro 4- L N I„. L E us r .n to • V) C Vl E 1n rt) rt1C N E 0 F- co 4- E y L CCe s .r L 4-,.c L Y'O . .O C E a. C C • p • L U • •C N 0• al Vf la U C .O r O a-+ U C C •o U N U 0 C.> L (0 • ro 61 C. • 3- • 4) C • In N ..+ 3 i' L. •-• V)O V) I- .-) rr N t 1- •-• C7 •-• 4/)•,-- .--. 1-104 Cr, V inC0 Crescent Ridge CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 58-83 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESDTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENOING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LANO IN EACH OISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District, R1-22 District, and Industrial General District, and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 13-83-R1-13.5-RM-6.5 District (hereinafter "PUD 13-83-R1-13.5-RM-6.5"), which includes R1-13.5 and R1-9.5 Zoning Districts. Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of , 1984, entered into between OCC Oevelopment and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement") and that certain Owners' Supplement to the Developer's Agreement, dated as of , 1984, entered into between Craig R. Morton and Associates, Inc., Eden 5000 Properties, Crescent Ridge Development, Frank W. Griswold, Blaine Clarence Burdick, III, and Brian Henry Burdick and the City of Eden Prairie. The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD-13-83- R1-13.5-RM-6.5, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-13-83-R1-13.5-RM-6.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-13-83-R1-13.5-RM-6.5 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of • the City Code, which are contained in PUD-13-83-R1-13.5-RM-6.5, are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-13-83-R1-13.5-RM-6.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is, removed from the Rural District, R1-22 District, and Industrial General District, and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 13-83-R1- 13.5-RM-6.5 Oistritt, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B. shall be and are • amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of ATTEST: ohn D. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of Exhibit A Proposed R1-13.5 Zone That part of the Southeast Quarter, Section 7, Township 116 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Southeast Quarter; thence westerly, along the north line of said Southeast Quarter, to a point 600.00 feet easterly from the northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Southeast Quarter; thence southerly, deflecting to the left 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, a distance of 433.71 feet; thence southeasterly, • deflecting to the left 16 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, a distance of 265.00 feet; thence southerly, deflecting to the right 22 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 500.00 feet; thence southerly, deflecting to the right 11 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 270.00 feet; thence ' southeasterly, deflecting to the left 54 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 265.00 feet; thence southerly, deflecting to the right 48 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 400.00 feet; thence southeasterly, deflecting to the left 46 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds to the northerly line of State Highway No. 5; thence northeasterly, along said northerly line, to the east line of said Southeast Quarter; thence northerly, along said east line, to said point of beginning. Proposed RM-6.5 Zone Tht part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, Section 7, Township 116 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence easterly, along the north line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of• 600.00 feet; thence southerly deflecting to the right 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, a distance of 621.73 feet; thence westerly, deflecting to the right 70 degrees 20 minutes 35 seconds, to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence northerly along said west line to said point of beginning; and, That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, Section 7, Township 116 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence westerly along the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 121.28 feet to the southeasterly right- of-way line of the Chicago Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad; thence southwesterly along said right-of-way line, a distance of 474.88 feet; thence southerly, deflecting to the left 65 degrees 34 minutes 30 seconds, a distance of 785.61 feet; thence easterly, deflecting to the left 105 degrees 43 minutes 03 seconds, to the east line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence northerly, along said east line, to said point of beginning. 1./6 .. a...-.-. • Proposed PUD Concept . • The Southeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 22 except that part. thereof lying Southeasterly of State Highway No. S, and l except State Highway No. 5, and • �]fCEt7 • That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 116 North, Range 22 West of the Sth Principal • Meriden described as follovo; of the'beginning South at a east Quarter distan the th line of said 1252 20 feet Northwest sterlytfrromrthe northwest corner of card Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence southwesterly to a point on the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 684.20 feet . southerly from the northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of . the Southeast Quarter (said last described line to be hereinafter known as "Line A"); then northerly along the vest line of said . • • Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter to its intersection with a line 130.00 feet northwesterly of. measured et right • angnl�es to.and parallel with said "Line A"; thence northeasterly southeasterly atlrightline angles distance distancefoS03.79 15 00 feet; thence Northeasterly, parallel with said "Line A", to its intersection with the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast ' Quarter; thence easterly along said north line to the point of •beginning. ,, • WA WEPT • • Tract A, described as follows, Commencing at a point on the • line Southwest corner Addition, 1, Blockp2,ht Heritage . Park First Addition, which shall be known as the point of beginning, thence westerly on a line perpendicular to the west :line of said Heritage Park First Addition a distance of 220 feet, thence south 200 feet. thence east 220 feet to the westerly line of said Lot 2, Block 2, Heritage Park First Addition, thence t • north along the westerly line of Heritage Park First Addition, to the point of beginning, together with a non-exclusive easement , • for ingress to and egress from Tract A described as follows: a • Commencing at the Northeasterly corner of Tract A. . thence north along the westerly line of Heritage . Park First Addition a distance of 30 feet, thence • - : westerly on a line perpendicular to the westerly . • ' line of said Heritage Park First Addition a • distance of 220 feet, thence souh 30 feet to the• ' • Northwesterly corner of said Tract A to he point •of beginning. _ ' Said easement shall run with and be appurtenant to the said Tract A, for the benefit of its owners, their heirs, successors and • asefgns and shall be perpetual; provided, however, that upon the dedication and extension of Kilmer Avenue westerly as the same appears in the plat of Heritage Park First Addition, over and ' "' .upon the land subject to said easement so as to afford ingress to • • , and egress from said Tract A to and from a public street or road • . equivalent to that afforded by said easement so as to constitute • such land as a public street or roadway, and upon acceptance by • the Village of Eden Prairie of such extension as a public street, • • said easement shall be extinguished in its entirety. . and EXCEPT • Tho Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 22 except that part thereof lying • Southeasterly of State Highway No. 5 and except State Highway No. 5, and , • • EXCEPT - . • • Tho Easterly 600 feet of the Southerly 363 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the southeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, { • knnge 22 - all lying north of the northerly right-of-way of State • Highway No, b, • • • and Fxccrt The Northwest y of the Southeast. t, of Section 7, Township 116. kings 22. ];c,nu•p in County, t•.umesota, lying south of the southerly right-of-way line of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul • and Pacific kailroad. Crescent Ridge PUD-l-84-DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1984, by and between DCC Development, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Industrial to Medium Density Residential for 25± acres, Planned Unit Development Concept for Industrial, Open Space, and Mixed Residential uses on 152.4 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review and removal of 46.6 acres of the property from the Industrial General, R1-22, and Rural Districts, to place said 46.6 acres of the 152.4 acres within the PUD-l-84-R1-13.5-RM-6.5 District, including variances, and Preliminary Plat of 27.5 acres for large lot residential and 20 acres for multiple residential, located north of Highway #5 at the western boundary of the City of Eden Prairie, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully desribed in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof and hereinafter referred to as "the property;" and, WHEREAS, developer wishes to construct 118 multiple family units and 14 single family units upon Phase I of the property, as depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof; NDW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #1-84 and Resolution #83-3D4, for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, and Resolution #83-306, for Preliminary Plat, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: 1. Developer shall plat and develop the property in conformance with LI 7 the materials dated January 16, 1984, as revised, and reviewed, and approved by the City Council on December 20, 1983, and attached hereto as Exhibit 6, subject to such changes and modifications as are provided herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein. 2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. Prior to submission of the final plat to the City, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's approval of: A. Detailed plans regarding sewer, water, storm sewer, and streets. B. A drainage and utility easement over the 60+ acre lowland area, as depicted in Exhibit D. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Ehxibit C, attached hereto. 4. Prior to submission of the final plat to the City, Developer shalt submit to the Director of Community Services, and receive the Director's approval of, the following: A. Plans for an eight-foot wide asphalt trail along the perimeter of the marsh area, as depicted on Exhibit B. With each phase of development, that portion of the trail within each such phase of the development shall be constructed by Developer as depicted in Exhibit B. B. Plans for five-foot wide, five-inch thick concrete sidewalks along one side of the public streets on the property, as depicted on Exhibit B. C. Plans for the totlot structure, which meet City standards, • which shall be developed in the northeast portion of the site as shown on Exhibit B. There shalt be a five-foot wide, five-inch thick concrete sidewalk constructed within the right-of-way of Evener Way, and from the location of the structure to Evener Way. The Developer shall provide for ownership and maintenance of the totlot by the Phase I multiple residential homeowner's association. Upon approval by the Director of Community Services, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the Director of Community Services, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 5. Prior to issuance of any building permits on the property, Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of the following: A. A specific landscaping plan for Phase I, as depicted on Exhibit B, which provides buffering of the free-standing parking areas from the approach access roads. The landscape plan shall take into consideration methods for elimination of as few trees as possible. The plans shall include, but not limited to, elimination of some free-standing garages, relocation of the totlot, and the use of retaining walls. B. Additional elevations of each unit type so that the City may review no less than two different building elevations for each of the four-, six-, and eight-unit buildings. Developer shall use brick on a significant portion of each building elevation as brick, to add to the detail or other detailed treatment approved by the Director of Planning. C. A development plan showing that no side-by-side units for the building elevations of the condominiums shall have elevations which are substantially identical, nor any units directly, or diagonally, across from each other shall be identical. Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 6. Developer shall fence all construction limits and notify the City 48 hours prior to any grading, tree cutting, or construction, within the wooded area in order to protect trees. Trees removed outside of the construction area, ' measured to be twelve (12) inches in diameter, or greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground level, shall be replaced by similar tree species, diameter inch for diameter inch (i.e. a Red Dak 12 inches in diameter may be replaced by three Red Oaks four inches in diameter). The trees used for replacement shall be no less than three inches in diameter. Prior to issuance of any building permit, Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of a tree inventory indicating the size, type, and location of all trees lost, damaged, or • destroyed during construction within 50 ft. outside of the construction limits, along with a replacement plan for said trees. This restriction shall not apply to building pads for residential structures on the property. 7. Developer shall provide signs prohibiting construction traffic to access the site from Kilmer Avenue and Atherton Way for the duration of the construction upon the property. 8. The Developer and the developer to the north for Apple Groves shall work to coordinate the construction of Lorence Way to provide access to the property prior to the construction of Dell Road. Development 44.1 F of any phase further west of Phase I, other than the Industrial area, shall be done in conjunction with the construction of Dell Road down to Highway #5 and the extension of Lorence Way to serve the additional phases of the property. A temporary private looped • road shall be constructed between the two private roads until the completion of Dell Road along the west property line as shown on Exhibit B. No building construction shall be allowed west of the bend in Lorence Way until Lorence Way is constructed to the buildings under construction, except that earthwork and utility work shall be allowed. Specific review of the multiple residential area of Phase II shalt be required. Detailed plans shalt be submitted for the architecture and site plan for this area as part of any rezoning request. 10. Prior to issuance of any grading permit on the property, Developer shalt obtain a permit to work within the marsh area of the property from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 11. In implementation of the Planned Unit Development, and as variance from certain provisions imposed by City Code, Chapter 11, City authorizes the following variances for the RM-6.5 area of Phase I of the property, only: A. Side Yard Setback (Common Wall) per Exhibit B. B. Minimum Lot Size per Exhibit B. • qG'i G— • OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT • TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN DCC DEVELOPMENT AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1984, by and between Craig R. Morton and Associates, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, Prairie Oaks Investment Company, a Minnesota limited partnership (general partner Craig R. Morton and Associates, Inc.), Eden 5000 Properties, a Minnesota limited partnership (general partner Joseph T. Burkard), Crescent Ridge Development, a Minnesota limited partnership (general partner Keiran W. O'Brien), Frank W. Griswold, a single person, Blaine Clarence Burdick, III, a single person, and Brian Henry Burdick, a single person, hereinafter referred to as "Owners," and the City of Eden Prairie, hereinafter referred to as "City:" • • For and in consideration of, and to induce, City to adopt Resolution #83-306 for a preliminary plat approval and Ordinance #1-84 changing the zoning of the property owned by Owner from Rural to_i-2 as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of , 1984, by and between DCC Development and City, Owners agree with the'City as follows: o. _ d 1. If OCC Development fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner shall not oppose the rezoning of the property back to the zoning as • it existed immediately prior to this agreement. 2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owners, their successors, heirs, and assigns of the property. 3. If the Owners transfer such property, owners shall obtain an agreement from the transferree requiring that such transferee agree to the terms of the Developer's Agreement. Cl,. Crecent Ridge CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-1 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE 53-83 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 53-83 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , 1984; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 53-83, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. 8. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 53-83 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph 8 herein, within 20 days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on , 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk t tI i Crescent Ridge The following is the full text of the City of Eden Prairie Ordinance No. 58-83, which was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on , 1984. Following the text of the Ordinance, the Developer's Agreement, which is incorporated therein by Section 5 of 'the Ordinance, is summarized. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 58-83 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESDTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANDTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District, R1-22 District, and Industrial General District, and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 13-83-R1-13.5-RM-6.5 District (hereinafter "PUD 13-83-R1-13.5-RM-6.5"), which includes R1-13.5 and R1-9.5 Zoning Districts. Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of , 1984, entered into between DCC Development and the City'of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement") and that certain Owners' Supplement to the Developer's Agreement, dated as of , 1984, entered into between Craig R. Morton and Associates, Inc., Eden 5000 Properties, Crescent Ridge Development, Frank W. Griswold, Blaine Clarence Burdick, III, and Brian Henry Burdick and the City of Eden Prairie. The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD-13-83- R1-13.5-RM-6.5, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-13-83-R1-13.5-RM-6.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-13-83-R1-13.5-RM-6.5 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code, which are contained in PUD-13-83-R1-13.5-RM-6.5, are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-13-83-R1-13.5-RM-6.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and 1-!!.1 .r arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is • feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is, removed from the Rural District, R1-22 District, and Industrial General District, and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 13-83-R1- 13.5-RM-6.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph 8, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor • PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of • • � j Summary of Developer's Agreement: Crescent Ridge Developer will develop the land as described in Exhibit A which is attached to and incorporated in the Developer's Agreement. In addition, the Developer's Agreement provides for: 1. Submission of plans regarding sewer, water, and drainage to Engineering Department. 2. Submission to the City Engineer of a development Plan for the land. 3. Submission to Watershed District of storm sewer construction plans. Developer to follow the rules and regulations of said Watershed District. 4. Developer's warranty of title to the land. 5. Construction and maintenance of public improvements which are to be conveyed to the City as well as preservation and restoration of areas surrounding said improvements. Submission of a bond or letter of credit to ensure the quality of said construction, maintenance, preservation, and restoration. 6. Rough grading to be performed by the Developer for improvements which the City will construct pursuant to 100% petition of all owners of the land. Submission of a bond or letter of credit for the rough grading. 7. Payment of first three (3) years' street lighting, engineering review, and street signs costs. 8. Developer's commitment not to oppose rezoning if Developer fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months. 9. Application of the Developer's Agreement to transferees of the land. 10. City's remedies in the event that Developer violates the provisions of the Developer's Agreement. 11. Notice to the City's cable franchise. 12. Submit a drainage and utility easement over the 60+ acre low land area, as depicted in Exhibit D of the developer's agreement. 13. Submit to the Director of Community Services, and receive the Director's approval of plans for the eight-foot wide asphalt trail along the perimeter of the marsh, to be developed and constructed in phases; plans for a five- foot wide, five-inch thick concrete sidewalk along one side of each of the public streets within the property; and plans for the totlot structure, with a five-foot wide, five-inch thick sidewalk for access to the totlot from Evener Way. Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, the above improvements upon approval by the Director of Community Services. 14. Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of a landscape plan for Phase I; additional elevations of each unit type, incorporating brick or other detailed treatment; and, a development plan showing the building elevations to be substantiG1':y zkiL different from any other adjacent unit type. Developer shall construct, or . cause to be constructed, the above improvements upon approval of the Director of Planning. 15. Developer shall fence construction limits, notifying the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading, tree cutting or removal, or construction within the wooded areas in order to protect trees. Developer shall replace trees removed, damaged, or destroyed during construction within 50 ft. outside of the construction limits, and submit a replacement plan for said trees prior to building permit issuance. This shall not apply to building pads for residential structures. 16. Developer shall provide signs prohibiting construction traffic to access the site from Kilmer Avenue and Atherton Way for the duration of construction upon the property. 17. Developer shall coordinate with the developer of the Apple Groves project to the north for the construction of Lorence Way to provide access to the property prior to the construction of Dell Road. Development, other than within the industrial area, shall be done in conjunction with the construction of Dell Road to Highway #5 and the extension of Lorence Way to serve the additional phases of the property. 18. Developer shall construct a temporary loop road between the two private roads until the completion of Dell Road along the west property line as shown on Exhibit B. No building construction shall be allowed west of the bend in Lorence Way until Lorence Way is constructed to the buildings under construction, except that earthwork and utility work shall be allowed. 19. Specific review of the multiple residential area of Phase Ii shall be required. 20. Prior to 4ssuance of any grading permit, Developer shall obtain necessary permits from the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Minnesota for work within the marsh area of the property. 21. City authorizes variances within the RM-6.5 area of Phase I of the property for side yard setbacks for common walls and for minimum lot size, both as depicted in Exhibit B of the developer's agreement. NOTICE: A printed copy of this ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on , 1984. John D. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor 1!q'1 (11 Primetech Park CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 14-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COJr,CIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the I-2 Park District and the Office District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the I-2 Park District and Office District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of • , entered into between MRTT Joint Venture and the City of Eden Prairie, and that certain Owner's Supplement to Developer's Agreement, between Richard W. Anderson, Inc., and the City of Eden Prairie, dated as of , which Agreement and Owner's Supplement are hereby made a part hereof. Section 6. This Drdinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the , 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of ATTEST: ( John D. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of /;, ' '61iiBIT A PD That part of Outlot B:"CITY WEST, according to the recorded plat ' • • •thereof, Hennepirrtounty,Minnesota, lying Northeasterly of the ' following described line: Commencing at the most southeasterly corner of said . Outlot B; thence North 35°42'37" East, assumed bearing along the southeasterly line of said Outlot 8, a •• i distance of 65.34 feet to the easterly line of said Outlot B; thence North 0°13'23" West, along the easterly line of said.0utlot 8, a distance of 98.74 feet to the 'r,, .southeasterly line of said Outlot B; thence North 48'44' 29" East. along the southeasterly line of said Outlot B, ' a distance of 390.00 feet to the point of beginning of :(, • line to be described; thence North 40°25'04" West a • ' distance of 684.83 feet to the westerly line of said I. Outlet B and there said line terminates. and lying easterly, southeasterly and southerly of the following, described line: •..+ • Beginning at a point on the northerly line of said • 1 • Outlet B, distant 385 feet westerly of the most ' easterly line of said Outlot 8 as measured along hoe, , • said northerly line; thence South 49°12'44" West a ;, ;; distance of 115 feet; thence South 16°29'35' East . ' I • a distance of 120 feet; thence South 69°11'1B" West a distance of 410 feet; thence South 45°15'26" West '. h,•• . '` • a distance of 125 feet to the westerly line of said 1„'' .•• ' Outlot B and there said line terminates. For the . •i' ' purpose of this description said northerly line is ' '.T, '.-, assessed to have a bearing of North 88'20'34' West. t:. . Together with that land to be acquired from the State of Minnesota :• .. r • lying easterly of and adjacent to the above described property ' Which lies between the southeasterly extension of the south- s' .`R 1i '. westerly line and the easterly extension of said northerly line �,:`, }' t of the above described property. •:4 a _ st ZONING • • 1-2 • • That part of Outlot 8, CiTY WEST,'according to the recorded plat thereof, f' '•� Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: •• r •' Cementing at the most southeasterly corner of said Outlot B: • �: '"`i �• thence North 35'42'37' East, along the southeasterly line of said �..•` y: Outlot 8, a distance of 65.34 feet to the easterly line of said 1i�. Outlet 8; thence North 0'13'23"West, along the easterly line of • said Outlot B, a distance of 98.74 feet to the southeasterly line Ali of said Outlot 8; thence North 48'44'29" East. along the south- ° Y: easterly line of said Outlot 9, a distance of 390.00 feet to the • point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing 7b:x• North 48°44'29" East along said southeasterly line, a distance of I 134.99 feet to the easterly line of said Outlot 8; thence North • 'r'i'(-v. 0°13'23" West, along the easterly line of said Outlot B a distance 41‘:.' of 90 feet to the southerly line of said Outlot C; thence South • . . B6°33'46" East, along the southerly line of said Outlot.8, a distance '•1,• of 20.00 feet; thence North 17'26'14" West 336.86 feet; thence North • t'. 88°57' West 57.39 feet; thence South 12°06'22" West 113.41 feet; •,';;0•? h thence South 70°5B'55" West 79.48 feet; thence North 40°25'04" West ,''' 58.00 feet; thence South 59°37.27" West 97.49 feet; thence South i•. r) 49°34'56" West 36.00 feet to it's intersection with a line that Vt. bears North 40°25'04" West from the point of beginning; thence South • •";• . ' 40°25'04" East 440.00 feet to the point of beginning. Together with that land to be acquired from the State of Minnesota lying easterly Yl • �' ;i'• . of and ediecent to the above described property which lies between the south- ' easterly extension; of the northeasterly and southwesterly lines of the above l}.•' " described property. , v .v`'" C,h 1 t.• 't. FF10E 704IN4 ' That part of Outlot B, CITY WEST, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Northeasterly of the following described line: Connencin9 at the most-seutheasterly corner of said Outlot B;_ • thence North 35°42'37" East, along the southeasterly line of said Outlot B. a distance of 65.34 feet to the easterly line of said Outlot B; thence North 0°13'23"West, along the easterly line of said Outlot 6, a distance of 98.74 feet to the southeasterly line • of said Outlot B; thence North 48°44'29' East, along the south- easterly line of said Outlet B. a distance of 3`10.00 feet to the ed; ° 04"nWest aedistance off684.83 line tfeet too be s the bwesterly cline e r th 5' of said - t Outlot B and there said line terminates. and l• ying southwesterly of the following described line: I Commencing at the point of beginning of the above described line; thence North 48°44'29" East, assumed bearing along said south- easterly line, a distance of 134.99 feet to the easterly line of said Outlot B; thence North 0°13'23"West, along the easterly line • of said Outlet B,a distance of 90.0 feet to the soutt, along teelyline of id Outlot B; southerly line of said Outlot hB�,ca distance of 100.81e South 86°33.46" sfeet to the south- • easterly line of said Outlot B; thence North 26°59'38" East along , the southeasterly line of said outlet B. a distance of 150 feet .. to the paint of beginning of line to be described; thence North • •• East8a52" West distanceaof1100rfeetce ftolthe northerlyelinence Nofta 20h °foot7• • d• rainage and utility easement as located in said Outlot 8; ahence distanceth of6170.03feet to thest along westerly line said r of said Outlotent B� and there said line terminates. . •'• EXCEPT, • ✓r That part of Outlot B, CITY WEST, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: 1 Cementing at the cost southeasterly corner of said Outlet B; • '',.t thence North 35'42'37" East, along the southeasterly line of said Outlot B, a distance of 65.34 feet to the easterly line of said Outlet B; thence North 0'13'23" West, along the easterly line of sfis Outlota dtstance of 58.74 fret thence North 4B'44'29"o the East,salongathersoy uth e Outiot i of said 0; .. t easterly line of said Outlet 8, a distance of 390.00 feet to the •.? i point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing North 48°44'29" East along said southeasterly line, a distance of ,� , r 134.99 feet to the easterly line of said Outlet B; thence North , 0'13'23" West, along the easterly line of said Outlet B a distance .7 , of 90 feet to the southerly line of said Outlet B; thence Southtstance 86'33'46" East, along the southerly line of said Outlot,B, a i r 1 of 20.00 feet; thence North 17°26'14"West 336.66 feet; thence North 1 BB'57' West 57.39 feet; thence South 12'Ob'22" West 113.41 feet; 7' thence South 70'tS'55'West 79.48 feet; thence North 40'25'04" West i . " ;� 50.00 feet; thence South 59°37'27" West 97.49 feet; thence South •°• 1 49'34'56" West 36.00 feet to it's intersection with a line that ` e. bears North 40°25'04" West from the point of beginning; thence South t . 40'25'04" East 440.00 feet to the point of beginning. I t ss. j easterly Together with that land to be acquired from the State of Minnesota lying of and adjacent to the above described property which lies between the soot - s • easterly extensions of the northeasterly and southwesterly lines of the above• i described property. I+ • 1r1{ is.` ... 4li,le if , ..0•. Primetech Park DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1984, by and between MRTT JOINT VENTURE, a general partnership consisting of Prime Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, and M-R Properties, a Minnesota general partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept approval of approximately 20 acres, and zoning from Rural to Office for approximately 1.0 acre, and zoning from Rural to 1-2 Park for approximately 5.0 acres, for construction of buildings for office, research, and development purposes, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said entire 20.0 acres hereinafter referred to as "the property," and; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Resolution #84-20, and Ordinance #14-84, Owner covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: 1. Owner shall develop the property in conformance with the materials revised and dated February 9, 1984, reviewed and approved by the City Council on February 7, 1984, and attached hereto as Exhibit 8, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. Owner shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein. 2. Owner covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Owner at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property, Owner . ,of4 • shall: A. Submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of plans for the overall signage for the entire development. B. Submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer for Phase I of the property as depicted on Exhibit B. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C. attached hereto. C. Submit to the Fire Marshall, and receive the Fire Marshall's approval of building plans for any structure to be built upon the property. Upon approval by the Fire Marshall, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed those improvements required by the Fire Marshall in accordance with applicable City Code sections. 4. Developer shall notify the City and the Watershed District 48 hours prior to any grading, tree removal, or tree cutting on the property. 5. Developer has provided the City with access control of the western side of City West Parkway. A copy of the access control document is attached as Exhibit D. Developer shall promptly record an original of said document. Developer shall continue to coordinate for a joint full access with the residential condominium project to be located to the north, which will share the northerly access to the property. The access control shall be as described in the restrictive covenant for this access, executed by the owner of the property, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit D. 6. The overall Planned Unit Development Concept shall not be less than 65% office usage, to be determined based upon the individual uses that are proposed in the overall Planned Unit Development Concept. The amount of space not specifically used for office in Phase I • shall be limited to the 20,000 sq. ft. area shown in the "medical firm building" as depicted on Exhibit B. 7. Any development beyond Phase I in the Planned Unit Development Concept shall require completion of the private loop road by the • Developer, as depicted on Exhibit B. B. Developer acknowledges that the property will benefit from any future improvements to Shady Dak Road in the vicinity of City West and agrees to pay its fair share of the corresponding special assessments. 9. Developer agrees that the private loop street and the private • utilities to be constructed on the property shall be built to City standards. Developer further agrees that the declaration of covenants recorded with the plat will provide that, in the event the City determines that the private loop street and the private utilities are not being maintained to City standards and the City, therefore, takes over the maintenance, the owners shall accept the assessments assigned by the City for such maintenance. • OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN MRTT JOINT VENTURE AND THE CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE • THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1984, by and between Richard W. Anderson, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Owners," and the City of Eden Prairie, hereinafter referred to as "City:" For and in consideration of, and to induce; City to adopt Resolution #84-20 for a preliminary plat approval and Ordinance #14-84 changing the zoning of the property owned by Owner from Rural to I-2 and Office as more fully described in that certain Oeveloper's Agreement entered into as of • , 1984, by and between MRTT Joint Venture, and City, Owners agree with the City as follows: 1. If MATT Joint Venture, fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner shall not oppose the rezoning of the property to Rural. 2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owners, their successors, heirs, and assigns of the property. 3. If the Owners transfer such property, owners shall obtain an agreement from the transferree requiring that such transferee agree to the terms of the Developer's Agreement. • RICHARO W. ANDERSON, INC. STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Li r?I Primetech Park CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. 84-48 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE 14-84 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 14-B4 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of 1984; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 14-84, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said • text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said • ordinance. B. That said text shalt be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 14,84 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on , 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Lj,e {,ti- Primetech Park The following is the full text of the City of Eden Prairie Ordinance No. 14-84, which was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on , 1984. Following the text of the Ordinance, the Developer's Agreement, which is incorporated therein by Section 5 of the Ordinance, is summarized. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 14-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the I-2 Park District and the Office District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the I-2 Park District and Office District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. • Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of , entered into between MRTT Joint Venture and the City of Eden Prairie, and that certain Owner's Supplement to Developer's Agreement, between Richard W. Anderson, Inc., and the City of Eden Prairie, dated as of , which Agreement and Owner's Supplement are hereby made a part hereof. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the , 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of C it? 1 Summary of Developer's Agreement: Primetech Park Developer will develop the land as described in Exhibit A which is attached to and incorporated in the Developer's Agreement. In addition, the Developer's Agreement provides for: 1. Submission of plans regarding sewer, water, and drainage to Engineering Department. 2. Submission to the City Engineer of a development plan for the land. 3. Submission to Watershed District of storm sewer construction plans. Developer to follow the rules and regulations of said Watershed District. 4. Payment of first three (3) years' street lighting, engineering review, and street signs costs. 5. Developer's commitment not to oppose rezoning if Developer fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months. 6. Application of the Developer's Agreement to transferees of the land. 7. City's remedies in the event that Developer violates the provisions of the Developer's Agreement. 8. Notice to the City's cable franchise. 9. Submit signage plans to City for review and receive City approval. 10. Submit street and utility plans to City for review and receive City approval. Construct, or cause to be constructed, said improvements. 11. Notify City and Watershed District 48 hours before grading, tree removal, or tree cutting. 12. File access control document at County. Continue to coordinate future joint access with property to the north. 13. Overall project shall not be less than 65% office, with first phase portion which is not office limited to the 20,000 sq. ft. portion of the medical firm building. 14. Acceptance of future assessments, as applicable, for Shady Oak Road. 15. Private loop street and utilities therein to be built to City standards. If not maintained to City standards, and City takes over maintenance, owners shall accept assessments assiged by City for said maintenance. NOTICE: A printed copy of this ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on 1984. Sohn D. frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor Kinder Care Learning Center • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA OROINANCE NU. 18-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT ANO PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL OESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Commercial Regional Service District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Commercial Regional Service District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. This Ordinance 'shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered publisETrat a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the __day of . { 4107 CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. 84-49 A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF COUNCIL APPROVAL OF KINDER CARE LEARNING CENTER AT SINGLETREE LANE AND GLEN LANE ON 0.71 ACRE BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal for a Kinder Care Learning Center for construction of a day care facility on approximately 0.71 acre, located in the northeast quadrant of Singletree Lane and Glen Lane, is herein approved subject to the following specific conditions: 1. The development plans, preliminary plat, and elevations, all dated March 1, 1984, and attached hereto shall apply. 2. Prior to final plat, developer/owner shall meet with the Engineering Department regarding utilities. 3. Prior to issuance of any building permit, developer/owner shall: A. Submit to the Planning Oepartment, and receive approval of, color samples of the brick, shingles, and trim. B. Submit to the Planning Department, and receive approval of, detailed exterior lighting information. C. Submit to the Planning Oepartment, and receive approval of, a landscape plan, bond, and contract. 0. Pay the required Cash Park Fee. ADOPTEO by the City Council on , 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk I/ 90 Edenvale Apartments II CITY DF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • ORDINANCE NO. 19-84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL DF THE CITY DF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the RM-2.5 District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the RM-2.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision. 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adapted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of 4 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-50 A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF COUNCIL APPROVAL OF EDENVALE APARTMENTS PHASE II FOR 70-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING ON 4.98 ACRES BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal for Edenvale Apartments Phase II by Bar-ett Construction, for a 70-unit apartment building on approximately 4.98 acres, located east of Edenvale Apartments Phase I on the north side of Valley View Road, is herein approved subject to the following specific conditions: 1. The revised plans, dated March 1, 1984, and attached hereto shall apply. 2. Prior to issuance of any building permit, developer/owner shall: A. Receive approval of grading and drainage plans from the Purgatory Creek Watershed District. B. Provide erosion control and slope stabilization plans to the City Engineer for review and approval. C. Meet all applicable Engineering Department requirements relative to utilities, roads, erosionn control, and storm water run-off. D. Provide a detailed landscape plan prepared in accordance with City requirements and subject to Planning Staff approval, noting tree type, quantity, size, and method of.installation. E. Submit development plans to the Fire Marshall for review and recommendations. F. Pay the required Cash Park Fee. ADOPTED by the City Council on , 1984. Wolfgang H. Fenzel, Mayor ATTEST: I. John D. Frane, City Clerk U/12 Red Rock Ranch PUD-CONCEPT-1-84-DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1984, by and between Rohert H. Mason, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept approval of approximately 150+ acres, located between the east shore of Red Rock Lake and Mitchell Road, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof and hereinafter referred to as "the property;" and, WHEREAS, Planned Unit Development Concept 1-84 consists of materials dated February 15, 1983, reviewed and approved by the City Council on February 15, 1983, excerpts from which are attached hereto as Exhibits B and D, hereinafter referred to as PUD 1-84; NOW, THEREFORE, City approves PUD Concept 1-84 subject to the provisions of Eden Prairie City Code Chapter 11.40, Subdivision 1, and subject to the following conditions: 1. That developer leaves no graded areas left unrestored at any time during the development process. 2. That the maximum gross density of the site shall be within a density range of 2.5 units per acre, not exceeding 3.5 units per acre, or 525 units. Density over 2.4 units per acre is substantiated on a site-by-site basis according to the overall Planned Unit Development. 4c) 3. That the sites adjacent to existing single family (Sites E. F. I, and K) are within a density range of 2.0-3.5 units per acre. ( Anything over two (2) units per acre must have appropriate buffer and transition treatment, which is approved by the Director of Planning. That Site B is within a density range of 3.5-6.0 units per acre. 4. That as defined by Exhibit E, any development subsequent to Phase I shall require the extension of the collector street through to County Road #1. Site IA is shown as 25-30 homesites in Site A, and the developer agrees to extend the northern loop road to the east boundary for any development subsequent to Site IA within Site A. 5. That the final connection to County Road #1 through East Starring Lane is not made until sewer is extended to the Starring Lane neighborhood. 6. That the road connection from this development to Corral Lane is reviewed by the uture Phases of the development. That the connection is made in the future for inter- connection of neighborhoods, and to provide two ways out of Corral Lane, and is not made in such a way as to encourage the short- cutting of the County Road #1/County Road #4 intersection. The road connection shall not Cr"be made until the extension of sewer into the Corral Lane area has been accomplished and reconstruction of said roads has taken place. 7. That the collector oad running through the site is aligned directly with County Road #4, south of County Road #1, and that no units have direct access to the collector road. 8. That right-of-way requirements for the central spine road are determined during the feasibility study for this road, but would not be less than 66 feet, and that the road is not.be less than 32 ft. in width and has at least a bikeway on one side. 9. That the property is developed, on a site-by-site basis, consistent with Exhibit B and the following guidelines: A. Site A--Setback standards from the lake are not varied, but front yard setback standards and City road standards for a short cul-de-sac at the end of the peninsula, or a private road, may be considered with very large lots as a method of preserving slopes and trees. B. Site B--This site is within a density range of 3.5 to 6.0 units per acre. C. Site C--A density of up to 8.0 units per acre is used, with the suggestion of a clustered approach in order to preserve the amenities. D. Site D--A density of up to 10.0 units per acres is used, and major emphasis is placed on transitioning carefully between �, A the higher density of Site 0 and the lower density of Site E. k E. Site E--This site is developed within density range of of 2.0 to 3.5 units per acre. F. Site F--This site is developed within a density range of 2.0 to 3.5 units per acre. G. Site G--This site is developed within a density of up to 4.5 units per acre. H. Site H--This site is developed within a density range of up to 8.0 units per acre for multiple family attached units. I. Site I--This site is developed within a density range of up to 2.0 units per acre. J. Site J--This site is developed within a density range of up to 2.0 units per acre. K. Site K--This site is developed within a density range of 2.0 to 3.5 units per acre. 10. That dedication of the public park along the south shore of Red Rock Lake at the approximate location shown on Exhibit B meets the following specifications: A. The park shall have approximately 450+ feet of lakeshore with a minimum width of 400 feet at a point 200 feet back from the lakeshore, and a minimum width of 200 feet over the entire park. The park shall be approximately 4.3 acres in size. B. The final dimensions and park configuration is determined at the time of rezoning and preliminary plat approval for Red Rock Ranch Phase I. C. The park configuration may be affected by the final alignment of the collector street, which abutts the park. 0. The guidelines for park dimensions are to provide adequate space for park uses and buffer and screening for adjacent lots. E. The developer will dedicate the park simultaneously with final platting of any site in Phase I, and that the City will commence design and construction on the park at that time. 11. That the development include an eight-foot wide asphalt trail along the collector and a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the northern loop road, which connects to the public trail around Red Rock Lake's north shore. Review of the need for additional private Li i'Jf1 trails, tot lots, or other park features with future developments shall be made by the City. • 12. That the 0.8+ acre triangle of land south of Research Road is dedicated to the City with the first phase of the project. 13. That the Cash Park Fee would be paid on all sites, except Site A, a 51+ acre single family site. No Cash Park Fee is paid on Site A as a credit for dedication of the Starring Lake Park (0.8 acres) and the Red Rock Lake Park. 14. That street connections from the collector to Corral Lane are planned for in later phases of the project. The intent for such a connection will be to restrict any through traffic by design of the connection. 15. That the extension of the collector road to the intersection of existing County Road #1 and County Road #4 is made after Phase E is constructed. Because of the extensive length, phasing with utilities and City uncertainties involving transportation needs, the decisions regarding exact timing and method of financing will be made at a time to be determined at the discretion of the City based on need. 16. That the design of the collector shall meet City design and access requirements. 17. That the development of the property complies with Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 18. That the development of the property complies with Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 19. That the development of the property complies with Exhibit E, attached hereto and made a part hereof. l Lt�; C., • • EXHIBIT A • Legal Description • Red Rock Ranch Government Lot 3, EXCEPT that part thereof lying easterly of the centerline of Mitchell Road. AND, Government Lot 4, EXCEPT that part thereof described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Government Lot 4; thence south along the east line of said Government Lot 4 a distance of 321.69 feet; • • thence westerly and parallel with the north line of said Government Lot 4 and its westerly extension to the intersection with the northerly extension of the west line of Government Lot 5, Section 21, Township 116, Range 22; thence northerly along said northerly extension to the shoreline of Red Rock Lake; thence northerly along said shoreline to the north line of said Government Lot 4; thence easterly along said north line to the point of beginning. AND, Government Lot 5; AND that part of Government Lot 6, lying east of the west 300.00 feet thereof, all in Section 21, Township 116 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. Subject to an easement for public right-of-way purposes in Mitchell Road and Research Road. ALSO, That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 116 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as follows: Beginning at a point on the north line of the Southwest Quarter of Section 21, distant 1013.76 feet westerly from the northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter; thence southerly, parallel with the west line of said East Half of the Southwest Quarter, to the centerline of County Road No. 1, also known as Pioneer Trail; thence westerly along the centerline of said road to the intersection with a line 16.50 feet easterly of, measured at a right angle to and parallel with the west line of said East Half of the Southwest Quarter; thence northerly, along the said parallel line, to the north line of said Southwest Quarter; thence easterly, along said north line to the point of beginning. Subject to an easement for public right-of-way purposes in County Road No. 1. Also subject to and together with an easement for roadway purposes over the West 33.00 feet of that part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 21 lying northerly of the centerline of County Road No. 1. • L?3 I) • { i `� - .—"_� - 0. 1 ;ir ,•i�if ,•i t,?n ra :t it :.•, il 't(1l�rJ{ ,'}t- �rl�tt l:�IT. i - to !`J •, . I iC..} i r l ' 7 \.,'i p is, lU ' ' t ,"• f, i s • i)):/ t••• ,__ .1•.-.-1't', ; tom � S -� ' unti.1: l�1 t :/J, �,� —""' J —`=--�•`� , , .'�-�°• / is-" \ � , ._��-:�. • • �,' ." . <\� • „____ _ ,�-1 ` ,;I ' f.'y .�;a..` .:� J,/�•, `l.\ '� ';pi t t, i'f '''Jr`::''''''7. --'-''•----•7•--:.;:.,:t 1•!,•- It-r.,„,:, ,,,,,,,, .,-,_.1,L.',?-1L,illj'',......,..... ------4.:;' • ` :o`a+• r V \ Y \�\ '- t�l f-� ,� h \�It - •�i� �.\'\ �� ,\ /u� j//i \ 1 1��. t • ') • •• 1 0 "1:3 j•'''" 'Lli\- '' •...'• •1; ( •-‘.Y-Ik( •''''. ' l'i- ):'•'-'''''',"\' :' ' '\'''•-•'%''' rl • JIC } t .\ 'fit: 111 .. : X >I � a J :. •\_1 a ' r {\ \ ` ' \'k•��` r':�`,_`f�� � � 1 � \ tt � ; ��1 .� � . \� � � 1.4 ^. t { ` � ,;,• it 7 \ t j)j I �--� 1, �'7 { : `;`i,`;i i� E ;�i,•.-f r f-1I-- ;'i • CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 • MARCH 1, 1984 PROJECT: Storm Sewer and Street Improvement in Creekridge Estates I.C. 52-040 TO: MIDWEST PAVING AND RECYCLING, INC. You are hereby directed to make the following changes to your • Contract for the above referenced project. NATURE OF CHANGE: This is a correction to Change Order No.1. Midwest Paving and Recycling, Inc. found an error in the billing for the original change order that was approved by the City Council in October, 1983. The balance of this change order subtracts the charges for retesting as provided in the contract documents. ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT QUANTITIES: Add the following quantities to the current Contract quantities. 10/3 Cat and Roller w/operator 6 Hours @ $40.00 = $ 240.00 (Less charges for Retesting required because of test failures) 1. 1 aggregate material retest $ -36.50 2. 1 bituminous extraction retest $ -50.00 TOTAL $ 153.50 SUMMARY OF ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT TOTAL AMOUNT: Contract Total Amount prior to this Change Order $ 50,963.22 Increase resulting from this Change Order $ 153.50 Revised Contract Total Amount including this Change Order - $ 51,116.72 THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE APPROVED: THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTED: THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MN. MIDWEST /` ?ING RECYCLING, B y - �p DATE LI? ' DATE 3 " _G! .__ March 27, 1984 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 84-58 RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT • AND CALLING FOR A HEARING WHEREAS, a report has been given by the City Engineer to the City . Council on March 27, 1984, recommending the following improvements to wit: I.C. 52-059A, Sewer and Water Improvements to serve Carmel Development and vicinity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: 1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of property abutting or within said boundaries for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to M.S.A. Section 429.011 to 429.111, at an estimated total cost of the improvements as shown. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 17 day of April,1' 4 at 7:30 P.M. at the Eden Prairie School Board Meeting Room, 8100 School Road. The City Clerk shall give published and mailed notice of such hearing on the improvements as required by law. } ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on March 27, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk yqs March 27, 1984 CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 84-59 RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT • AND CALLING FOR A HEARING • • WHEREAS, a report has been given by the City Engineer to the City Council on March 27, 1984, recommending the following improvements to wit: • I.C. 52-053, Utility and street improvements to serve Bryant Lake Office Tech Center and vicinity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EOEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: 1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of property abutting or within said boundaries for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to M.S.A. Section 429.O11 to 429.111, at an estimated ' total cost of the improvements as shown. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 17 day of April,I9$4 at 7:30 P.M. at the Eden Prairie School Board Meeting Room, 8100 School Road. The City Clerk shall give published and mailed notice of such hearing on the improvements as required by law. AOOPTEO by the Eden Prairie City Council on March 27, 1984. . Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk • March 27, 1984 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENHEPIN COUNTY, MINNE:SOTA RESOLUTION NO. 84-60 • RESOLUTION APPROVING FINALt PLAT OF ARBOR GLEN 2ND ADDITION • WHEREAS, the plat of Arbor Glen 2nd Addition in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have --- been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: - • • A. Plat Approval Request for Arbor Glen 2nd Addition ' is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's Report on this plat dated March 14, 1984. B. Variance is herein granted from City Code i2.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said Engineer's Report. C. That the City Clerk is 'hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required • ' by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3. D. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. E. That the Mayor and City Manager are herby authorized to Execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADDP1ED by the City Council on March 27, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST SEAL John U. Franc, Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members THROUGH Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician pim DATE: March 14, 1984 • SUBJECT: ARBOR GLEN 2ND ADDITION PROPOSAL: The developer, Burko, has requested final plat approval of Arbor Glen 2nd Addition. This plat containing approximately 8 acres, is a replat of Outlot B, Arbor Glen and is located in the North 1 of Section 10. The developer intends to construct 28 attached single family units within this plat. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on September 7, 1982, per Resolution 82-212. Zoning to this parcel to RM 6.5 was finally read and approved by the Council on January 18, 1983, per Ordinance 2-82. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed on January 18, 1983. VAR1t CES: A variance from the requirements of City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be necessary. All other variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTIt.: IES AND STREETS: All utilities will be installed by the developer in conformance with City requirements. All utilities and the 24' roadway installed within the plat area will be owned and maintained by the property owners through a homeowner association. Sufficient documentation covering maintenance of the utilities and roadway must be provided to the Engineering Department prior to release of the final plat. These documents must be recorded with the plat. PARK ITDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. Warranty deeds, conveying Outlots A and C, Arbor Glen to the City, have previously been recorded. PG. 2, Final Plat Arbor Glen 2nd Addition BONDING: The requirements for bonding are covered in the Developer's Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Arbor Glen 2nd Addition • subject to the requirements of this report, the Oeveloper's Agreement and the following: • 1. All street lighting within the site will be owned and maintained by the property owners. The developer will be responsible for installation arrangements. 2. Receipt of fee for street signs in the amount of $145.00. 3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $840.00. 4. Receipt of recordable documents covering roadway and utility maintenance. 5. A grading permit issued by the Engineering Department will be necessary prior to the start of construction within the plat. DLO:sg • • cc: Mr. Richard Bury Mr. Howard Kyllo Mr. Harold Peterson • • ' 1 • i } q19 March 27, 1984 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 84-61 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF THE PRESERVE COMMERCIAL PARK NORTH 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of The Preserve Commercial Park North 2nd Addition has been submitted in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for The Preserve Commercial Park North 2nd Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated March 15, 1984. B. That the City Clerk i.s hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution in the office of the Register of Deedsand/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. • ADOPTED by the City Council on March 27, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk qO • . CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT ' TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician ,J,/c DATE: March 15, 1984 SUBJECT: THE PRESERVE COMMERCIAL PARK NORTH 2ND ADDITION PROPOSAL: The developer, The Preserve, has requested City Council approval of the final plat of The Preserve Commercial Park North 2rd Addition. The plat contains approximately 6.75 acres to be divided into 4 cormiercial lots and includes the dedication of an access roadway. A veterinary hospital occupies Lot 1, Block 2 and a Bu•ger King restaurant has been proposed for Lot 3, Block 2. This plat is located in the South : of Section 14. HISTORY: P.U.D. concept approval for Area G of the Preserve was granted by the City Council on September 2, 1975, per Resolution 1033. Zoning to C-Regional Service was finally read and approved by the City Council on May 3, 1977, per Ordinance 357. The Preliminary Plat was approved by the City Council on March 6, 1984, per Resolution 84-41. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: • All necessary utilities, walkway and roadway will be installed by the developer in conformance with City requirements. The street name shown on the final plat, Commercial Drive, conflicts with other names in use and must be changed prior to release of the final plat. The new name must be approved by the Engineering Dept. Additional drainage and utility easements along lot lines will be shown on the plat prior to release. PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication shall be in conformance with City Code. 1/2'J Pg. 2, Final Plat The Preserve Commercial Park North 2nd Addition • BONDING: A performance bond or letter of credit will be required to cover the installation of all public utilities and roadways. All bonding shall conform to the requirements of the City Code. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of The Preserve Commercial Park North 2nd Addition subject to the requirements of this report and the following: 1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $460.00. 2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $1,404.00. 3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $135.00. 4. Receipt of recordable documents to cover snow storage and walkways along the access road. 5. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. DLO:sg • • cc: Mr. Larry Peterson Mr. Harold Peterson i • • • • 1.41'Z • • March 27, 1984 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 84-62 • A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF PAULSENS ADDITION • WHEREAS, the plat of Paulsens Addition has been submitted in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Mat approval request for Paulsens Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's Report on this plat dated March 16, 1984. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required by MSM 462.358, Subd. 3. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this resolutionto the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on March 27, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • L.-g3 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works (� FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician �t/ct'g DATE: March 16, 1984 • SUBJECT: PAULSENS ADDITIDN PROPOSAL: The developer, Dirlam Development, has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Paulsens Addition, a single family residential plat consisting of 43 lots. The plat contains approximately 21.6 acres located in the North of Section 7. The developer intends to combine Outlot A with future platting south of this addition and has indicated this approval will be soon requested. An existing home is located on Lot 5, Block 2. Lots 23 and 24, Block 3 are largely located within an existing marsh area and are intended for combination with previously platted lots in adjacent Nygren Estates (Lots 4 and 5, Block 1). HISTORY: Zoning to RI-13.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on November 1, 1983, per Ordinance 52-83. Resolution 83-266 defining specific conditions for approval was adopted by the City Council on November 1, 1983. The preliminary plat was approved by the Council on October 18, 1983, per Resolution 83-247. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All utilities, walkways, and roadways within the plat will be installed by the developer in conformance with City standards. It should be noted that sanitary sewer for this development has to be constucted • through the Apple Grove development. Therefore, the City does not warrant the timing of utility availability for this project with this approval. PARK DEDICATION: • The requirements for park dedication are covered in Resolution 83-266 and Eden Prairie City Codes. BONDING: The requirements for bonding are covered in City Code Section 12.50. Bonding requirements roust be satisfied prior to release of the final plat. • Pg., 2, Final Plat Paulsens Addition RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Paulsens Addition subject to the requirements of this report, Resolution 83-266 and the following: 1. Receipt of fee for street signs in the amount of $810.00. 2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $4,680.00. 3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $1,290.00. • 4. Satisfaction of Bonding requirements. DLO:sg cc: Mr. Dennis Dirlam Mr. Peter Knaeble • • ul5 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE March 27, 1984 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • • RESOLUTION NO. 84-63 ( A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT • OF CARMEL • • WHEREAS, the plat of Carmel • has been sub- mitted in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordin- ances of the City of Eden Prairie. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat Approval Request for Carmel is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's ' Report on this plat dated March 19, 1984. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution in the office of the Register of Deed'and/or Regis- • trar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3. • C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute • the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon com- pliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on March 27, 1984. • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: • SEAL • • John D. Frane, Clerk • sir IL • • • • • // � • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: • Mayor Penzel and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician ,lY ea DATE: March 19, 1984 SUBJECT: CARMEL PROPOSAL: • The developer, Hans Hagen Homes, Inc., has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Carmel, a single family residential plat located in the North =, of Section 2. This proposed first phase plat contains 34 lots located within approximately 14.5 acres. Lot 5, Block 2, contains an existing residence which is intended to remain and will retain access from Rowland Road. HISTORY: ' PUD concept approval was granted by the City Council on January 3, 1984, per Resolution 84-02. The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on January 3, 1984, per Resolution 84-03. Zoning to RI-13.5 was finally read and approved by the Council on March 6, 1984, per Ordinance 1-84. The Developer's Agreement, Owner's Supplement to Developer's Agreement, and a Park Purchase Agreement referred to within this report were executed by the City and Developer on March 6, 1984. VARIANCES: Setback variances will be allowed through Item 8 of the Developer's Agreement. All other variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal utilities, walkways, and streets will be installed within the development through City Improvement Contracts 52-059A and B. The locations for the walkways are covered in the Developer's Agreement. The developer has agreed to pay $20,000 to the City for maintenance costs for Rowland Road, as a result of anticipated increased traffic. This is covered in Item 9 of the Developer's Agreement and will become due upon release of the final plat. Item 10 of the Developer's Agreement covers the use of Rowland Road between this addition and Shady Oak Road for all construction traffic. Pg. 2, Final Plat of Carmel 3/19/84 { The street name Carmel Valley Road conflicts with an existing name and must be changed to a name acceptable to the Engineering Department prior to release of the final plat. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement and Park Purchase Agreement. BONDING: The requirements for bonding are covered in the Developer's Agreement. RECDMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Carmel subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the, following: I. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $770.00. • 2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $4,212.00. 3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $1,020.DO. 4. Receipt of Rowland Road maintenance fee in the amount of $20,ODO.DO. 5. Receipt of acceptable street name to replace Carmel Valley Road. DLO:sg cc: Mr. Hans Hagen • Mr. Ernest G. Rud • X(/ • • . CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • March 27, 1984 HENNEPIN CO:;NTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION WO. 84-65 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT • OF CITY WEST SECOND ADDITION • ' z ` s WHEREAS, the plat of City West Second Addition has been sub- mitted in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordin- ances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF .EDEN PRAIRIE: • A. Plat Approval Request for City West Second Addition is approved upon compliance with the recormendation of the City Engineer's ' Report on this plat dated March 19, 1984. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution in the office of the Register of Deed•and/or Regis- • trar of Titles for their use as required by NSA 462.358, Subd. 3.. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon com- pliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on March 27, 1984. • • Wolfgang H Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL . Jolin D. Frane, Clerk • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: David L. Olson, Engineering Technician P de. DATE: March 19, 1984 SUBJECT: CITY WEST SECOND ADDITION (Formerly Primetech) PROPOSAL: The developer, Richard W. Anderson, Inc., has requested City Council approval of the final plat of City West Second Addition, a replat of Outlot B, City West, which contains approximately 36 acres. The developer has requested the division to consist of Lot 1, Block 1 • (containing approximately 6 acres) with the remainder of the plat being divided into 5 outlots. The ownership of all outlots will be retained by the developer and the Outlots will be replatted upon development. This plat is located in Section 1. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on February 7, 1984, per Resolution 84-20. Ordinance 14-84, zoning the property to Office and I-2 is scheduled for second reading by the Council on March 27, 1984. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report is scheduled for execution on March 27, 1984. VARIANCES: All variance requests not covered through the Developer's Agreement must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All utilities and streets to be installed within this plat will be owned and maintained by an owners association. Copies of documents covering maintenance responsibilities, to be recorded with Hennepin County, must be provided to the Engineering Department prior to release of the final plat. Other requirements for the installation of utilities and streets are covered in the Developer's Agreement. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. BONDING: The requirements for bonding are covered in the Developer's Agreement. i • Pg. 2, Final Plat City West Second Addition RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of City West Second Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: 1. Receipt of Engineering fee in the amount of S120.00. • 2. Second reading of Ordinance 14-84 and execution of the Developer's Agreement. 3. Receipt of Documents covering utility and street maintenance. DLO:sg cc: Mr. Scott R. Anderson • • • • • • �lq'� MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council }' FROM: City Manager Carl J. Jullie G SUBJECT: Local No. 49 Labor Agreement for 1984 - 1985 1 DATE: March 23, 1984 Attached for your review and approval is the MAMA Cities/IUOE, Local No. 49, Recommended Labor Agreement for 1984 - 1985. The principal features, which are discussed in more detail in the attachments,are as follows: 1. INSURANCE The City's maximum contribution increases from $125.00 per month to $145.00 per month for 1984, and to $155.00 per month for 1985. 2. WAGES Maintenance I (a new classification) - $ 7.76 per hour. Maintenance II - Increased from $10.25 to $10.76 per hour • (plus 5%). Maintenance III - Increased from $10.70 to $11.24 per hour (plus 5%). The proposed insurance and wage increases are within the Council's 1984 budgetary allowances. The new Maintenance I wage rate has the potential for significant savings to the City in years ahead. It is recommended that the Council approve the attached Memo of Understanding dated February 22, 1984 and, as in past years, extend the additional insurance • benefits to all covered City employees. CJJ:jp Attachment • j,i t ti 1:4(-22,:;-r rMICR 121984 wr 6 Li Metropolitan Area management Arrociation of the Twin City Area February 23, 1984• TO: MANAGERS OF CITIES REPRESENTED BY MAMA IN THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH IUOE, LOCAL 49 FROM: James Spore, Chairman MAMA-49 Negotiating Committee SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED AGREEMENT WITH IUOE, LOCAL NO. 49 FOR CALENDAR YEARS 1984 AND 1985. A. ENCLOSURES 1. A copy of the signed MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING between MAMA and IUOE, Local No. 49. 2. Replacement pages for your MAMA-IUOE, LOCAL 49 MASTER ( AGREEMENT. B. CONTENT OF NEW AGREEMENT 1. Duration (ARTICLE XXIV - DURATION) The current MASTER AGREEMENT had a two-year duration of calendar years 1983 and 1984. • The new AGREEMENT extends that two-year time period with an agreement through 1985, with a reopener for negotiations during 1985 only for wages (APPENDIX A) and LOCAL ADDENDUM issues (individual city's APPENDIX B items). 2. Insurance (ARTICLE XIX - INSURANCE) a. Amount The employer's maximum contribution for health and life insurance is increased from $125.00 per month per employee to $145.00 for calendar 1984 and $155.00 for calendar 1985. • ( • -I • MAMA-49 CITY MANAGERS ( February 23, 1984 Page Two b. Dental Option The dental option remains unchanged from 1983. c. New Provision, Section 19.5 Employees, under Section 19.5, can choose to request that their wages be lowered from that due them under APPENDIX A so as to have the City pay all of the cost of the • employee and dependents health, life, and dental coverage. MAMA recommends that employees be given a single time each year when they must inform the City of their choice under 19.5 for the entire coming year. 3. Working Out of Classification (ARTICLE XXII) WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION PAY, ARTICLE XXII of the 1983 MASTER AGREEMENT is deleted from the 1984-85 MASTER AGREEMENT. This ARTICLE, was deleted since its substance is dealt with in the new wage appendix (APPENDIX A). 4. Wage Rates and Job Classifications Based on the expressed mandate of the MAMA cities represented by MAMA to lower the future costs of running their public works departments, the new AGREEMENT provides that the cities may at their sole discretion hire all new employees (employees hired after February 7, 1984) in the MAINTENANCE I classification at $7.76 per hour. Employees so hired will receive a higher wage rate only when they operate the equipment listed in APPENDIX A, Sections C-1 or C-2. The estimated future cost savings to the cities is quite substantial. In return for this future cost savings the AGREEMENT grandfathers all employees hired previous to February 7, 1984 above the new MAINTENANCE I job classification and deletes the old hire rate of 90% and One Year step rate of 95% of the contract rates. I,' • MAMA-49 CITY MANAGERS February 23, 1984 Page Three C. RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES IUOE, Local No. 49 has signed this MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. This MEMORANDUM constitutes the recommended agreement for City Council consideration. If the City Council approves this AGREEMENT the enclosed replacement pages should be inserted into the old AGREEMENT and the City and Union should sign the new AGREEMENT page. • D. QUESTIONS Please address your questions to either myself at the City of Burnsville, 890-4100, or Cy Smythe at Labor Relations Associates, 546-1470. JS:hfc Enclosures MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE METROPOLITAN AREA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (MAMA) REPRESENTING THE CITIES OF: Blaine Crystal New Hope Brooklyn Center Eden Prairie Oakdale Brooklyn Park Edina Richfield Burnsville Fridley Robbinsdale Circle Pines Golden Valley Roseville Columbia Heights Hopkins St. Louis Park Cottage Grove Minnetonka White Bear Lake Mounds View AND THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS (IUOE), LOCAL NO. 49, • AFL-CIO The following constitutes the changes which are agreed to by MAMA and IUOE, Local No. 49 in their Labor Agreement which terminates on December 31, 1984: 1. ARTICLE XIX - INSURANCE of the MASTER LABOR AGREEMENT will read: "ARTICLE XIX INSURANCE 19.1 The EMPLOYER will contribute• up to a maximum of one hundred forty-five dollars ($145.00) per month per employee for group health and life insurance including dependent coverage for calendar 1984. 19.2 The EMPLOYER will contribute up to a maximum of one hundred fifty-five dollars ($155.00) per month per employee for group health and life insurance including dependent coverage for calendar 1985. -1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING MAMA-IUOE, LOCAL NO. 49 19.3 By mutual agreement employees may use ten dollars ($10.00) of the per month per employee health insurance dollars in 19.1 and 19.2 for dental insurance for all unit employees. 19.4 Employees not choosing dependent coverage cannot be covered at EMPLOYER expense for any additional insurance than the individual group health and group life insurance. Additional life insurance can be purchased by employees at the employee's expense to the extent allowed under the EMPLOYER'S group policy." 19.5 Individual employees may provide for an increased EMPLOYER contribution for insurances over that amount stipulated by 19.1, 19.2 and 19.3 by lowering their salary from the rates stipulated in APPENDIX A to provide for an increased EMPLOYER contribution which will fully pay for the employee's health, life, and dental insurance, including dependent coverage." 2. ARTICLE XXII WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION is deleted from the body of the MASTER AGREEMENT. 3. ARTICLE XXIV DURATION will read: "ARTICLE XXIV DURATION This AGREEMENT shall be effective as of January 1, 1984 and shall remain in full force and effect until the 31st day of December, 1985, except that either party may reopen for negotiations for calendar 1985 the wage rates in APPENDIX A and the local issues as shown in the individual city's APPENDIX B - LOCAL ADDENDUM to the MASTER AGREEMENT." • -2- LP 7 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING MAMA-IUOE, LOCAL NO. 49 4. APPENDIX A - WAGES will read: "APPENDIX A WAGES A. The following wage schedule will be in effect from the first payroll period in 1984 through the last payroll period in 1984: • MAINTENANCE III $ 11.24 per hour MAINTENANCE II 10.76 per hour • MAINTENANCE I 7.76 per hour. B. All employees hired after February 7, 1984 may be classified at the sole discretion of the individual cities covered by this AGREEMENT as MAINTENANCE I and receive Working Out of Classification pay as provided by Section C of this APPENDIX. C. WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION PAY C-1. Employees required by the EMPLOYER and who are adjudged by the EMPLOYER to be qualified to operate the following items of equipment will be paid the MAINTENANCE III rate of pay for those hours assigned to the unit: (The list of equipment to be shown in the individual City's agreement for calendar 1984 will be that list as shown in the 1983 Agreement for the Heavy Equipment Operator rate of pay.) -3_ irk MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING MAMA-IUOE, LOCAL NO. 49 C-2. Employees hired after February 7, 1984 in the MAINTENANCE I classification who are required by the EMPLOYER and who are adjudged by the EMPLOYER to be qualified to operate the following items of equipment will be paid the MAINTENANCE II rate of pay for those hours assigned to the unit: The list of equipment to be shown in the individual City's agreement under C-2. for calendar 1984 will be as follows, except that equipment designated by any individual city as Heavy Equipment in the City's 1983 Agreement will be deleted from this list: Backhoe - Under 15' Reach Blacktop Paver Bobcat - Bombardier or MT Trackless Boom Truck Boom Truck - 30' and Over Brush Chipper Cement Mixer Chip Spreader/Self-Propelled Crawler Tractor - Under 50 N.P. Loader - 1 Yd. or More Loader, Front-End, 4 WD - 1 Yd. to 2.5 Yds. Oil Distributor Paint Striper - Truck Mounted Rollers (steel and rubber) Over 6 Ton Rollers - 6 Ton and Over Sewer Cleaner, Hydraulic and Vacuum Steam Boiler Street Sweepers - Pickup Type Tandems Tree Spade • Trucks - 10 Ton, 4 WD Trucks - Single-Axle Over 24,000 GVW Any vehicle requiring a State of Minnesota "Class B" Operators License -4 Li';7 • MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING MAMA-IUOE, LOCAL NO. 49 A. C-3. Employees assigned by the EMPLOYER to Utility Operator will be paid the wage rate of the job classification to which the employee is assigned." FOR MA: 1l FOR IUOE, LOCAL NO _9: 18421t,. x 72 • Dated this day of Dated this 6?2 day of Er?x,M l�1 , 1984. 'c , 1984. k . ( -5- • SUJ ''' t. GOLDEN VALLEY HOUSE gest 4820 Olson Memorial Highway Western Minneapolis,Minnesota 55422 588-0511 March 14, 1984 • Mr. Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Eden Paririe City Offices 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344-2499 Re: Sheraton Inn - Eden Prairie Dear Carl: The Developer's Agreement dated April 20, 1982 is approaching the renewal date and I would like to request an eighteen month extension. As you know, the Eden Prairie City Council in September, 1983 passed an inducement resolution authorizing $9,170,000 of Industrial Revenue Bonds. At that time, through Northland Mortgage Company, we began negotiating with ITT for a letter of credit to be used as a credit enhancement facility. ITT has indicated their interest in supplying this letter of credit, however Congress is now con- sidering a tax bill limiting the amount of tax-exempt financing available. It is our intent to utilize the IDB's if at all possible. According to different financial and political sources we have spoken with, the outcome of the Congressional discussions will be apparent by June 1st. We are presently negotiating with Security Pacific to obtain a Standby Comnitment to fund construction should IDB financing become unfeasible. • Thank you for your cooperation in aiding us in our request for renewal. • Sincerely youts, C Th Hotel Company PT/sr SUS • J MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Stephen Calhoon, Park Planner • • THRU: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: March 16, 1984 SUBJECT: Staring Lake Park - Trail Development Phase II • On March 15, 1984, at 2 P.M., staff received and publicly read bids for construction of • Phase II of the hard surfaced trail at Staring Lake Park. This trail will connect the • park shelter building to the Eden Prairie Senior Center. The project was bid with the paving as an alternate, the following bids were received: CONTRACTOR BASE BID BASE PLUS ASPHALT • Custom Surfacing $15,515 $38,465 PIehal Blacktopping $18,110 • $39,789 Asphalt Paving Materials $19,058 $40,920 ' Preferred Paving $20,875 $44,675 'j Barber Construction $19,780 $45,204 Buffalo Bituminous $22,750 $46,125 • McNamara-Vivant Contracting $28,425 $48,825 Munn Blacktopping $25,950 $50,600 Bury and Carlson $27,117 $51,612 Valley Paving $34,180 $63,760 Alexander Construction $39,814 $66,929 City staff believe the base bid plus the asphalt is very competitive and is less than the cost the City would incur using City maintenance crews and equipment. The estimated cost for this project was $41,000. Staff recommends the contract be awarded to Custom Surfacing for $38,465. This project is scheduled for completion by August 15, 1984, and is funded by cash park fees. • SC:md • • PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 11-84 1rORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 9 ENTITLED "PUBLIC PROTECTION, CRIMES AND OFFENSES" TO UPDATE ADOPTION OF STATUTES RELATING TO CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES BY REFERENCE AND TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN PARTS THEREOF; TO CHANGE PROVISIONS RELATING TO REGULATION OF USE OF ANDERSON LAKES; AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 9.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Eden Prairie City Code, Section 9.06, entitled "Prohibited Drugs and Drug Paraphernalia" is hereby amended by changing Subdivision 1 to read: Subd. 1. Adoption by Reference. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 152, Uniform Controlled Substances Act, are hereby incorporated herein and adopted by reference except sections 152.01, subd. 18; 152.092 through 152.096; and 152.15. Section 2. Eden Prairie City Code, Section 9.61, entitled "Regulation of Use of Anderson Lakes" is hereby amended by changing Subdivisions 1, 3 and 4 to read: Subd. 1. Anderson Lakes and all that part of the lake front owned by the Hennepin County Park Reserve District shall be and hereby is set apart for nature study purposes to be used only for such purposes and for such other recreational purposes, not inconsistent with nature study purposes. Subd. 3. It is unlawful for any person' to launch or remove any vessel from the waters or the ice of Anderson Lakes over public property, except as per- mitted by and under the supervision of the Hennepin County Park Reserve District staff for nature study. Subd. 4. Except for public officers, in the perform- ance of their duty, it is unlawful for any person to enter, remain within, drive, operate any vessel or watercraft into or within Anderson Lakes except as permitted by and under the supervision of the Henne- pin County Park Reserve District staff for nature study. 7 rt Section 3. Eden Prairie City Code, Chapter 1 entitled "General ItProvisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Includ- ing Penalty for Violation" and Section 9.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting.of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , 19 , and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of 19 ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor Published in the Eden Prairie News on the day of 19 • l -2- f0L CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST March 27, 1984 • CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) HEATING & VENTILATING M. G. Astleford Co., Inc. Egan & Son Company Design Consultants of Minneapolis Halls Heating, Inc. William Kranz, Inc. K & K Heating & Plumbing, Inc. Robert J. Lindahl Construction Larson-Mac Company, Inc. United Properties Lloyd's Sheet Metal Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY) Narkie Heating & Air Conditioning Quality Refrigeration & Mechanical Bloomberg Companies Ron's Mechanical Durst & Gans Construction Smith Heating & Air Conditioning Engrebretson Construction Ray N. Welter Heating Co. Hardel Construction Jensen/Bren Companies GAS FITTER Kellett Builders, Inc. Kyllo Development K & K Heating & Plumbing, Inc. Luse & Son, Inc. Larson-Mac Company, Inc. Tom Mason Associates Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors C. W. Morris Construction Quality Refrigeration & Mechanical Quam Development Ron's Mechanical Ruscon Homes Smith Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. Martin K. Schutrop Const. Thermex Corporation Sunshine Construction Ray N. Welter Heating Co. T & E Construction WELL DRILLING PLUMBING Max Renner Well Co., Inc. Arnst Plumbing Donald A. Rogers Egan & Sons Company Don Stodola's Well Drilling, Inc. Erickson Mechanical Company K & K Heating & Plumbing SCAVENGER Lakeville Plumbing & Heating Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors Roto-Rooter Plumbing By Reynolds Schrader Block Co., Inc. The Plumbing Place Richfield Plumbing Co. SEPTIC SYSTEMS Southwest Pi umbing Zachman Plumbing Rybak Digging & Trenching These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. ll / i 't• ( Pat Solie, Licensing «4✓c'1 i V /9 V nr `�._-G is ?4..c,et �' c`L6+v R.,/ tL ec.�. • f-c6,.n- pi.„,:,,,,' L �'/4. �SS3 y- Sf K f in )7A i l-r4//U%rrc= ‘C/> St -11-.:' e,L', .s 1 13 }7' I C/,/, 6 /7 A/c: c 1Fs 7r 4a7/c''', 4---cit ii 13-c II.1 F /"2/ 5 b— L/-y (/.Cc,'v ✓lt�G7' d2�.�;- .--7u I.— 1./. c771 .,�Iv /_.„-tIC I� } ./j��'�, -1,--C`-C ./ ; /i'�-1 Cay- -ee ��C'z'L JLG L.{l It4t .. ..C-h-C,c 1, /}} (J z e > mot/ J� t /'/�.4 141--e r; /`Z-t-/1. 1' le-''tC'' /LPL✓Z-L1 ✓��c�L�. ..[ LL���!' .'f.f/ /� L LC''/' G:' .l ,� )�:y . �/�lit' /L Z.C 4" E9,/ (-tit,-t�L%/I t-C'�7� z a J . h.t''•/ ,1 l` 4 .-L,.-e .-2 ZC- L L. te,t, t' i�7,,) i"L Z,./k -t ::.i'.._ F! C.-de(c r.Eln4t.e O ft_e,.-zc ✓ C" Act` t •,..6"afi_L-( l-et'ict.e i - I le. t-1,1- ?•' //1��� G .}: I 'J/I�c ,{/-Z/L( ,/ .(! 7i L' / / 2/0 ,L<. /IJ•:: :- l _ .-1:-• I 1 ./.-.,,,,4,—,---c /.-...A,,./a• -.: (4 , -7-JA.. ',._,,-, --(.c.. r t.7.-7-t- ,/2,-:,.. ?,-/,...:.,-;. ' , CL t .2 , , c` �t vita^� /71 •�C c'9v a lC' ;Et: �1I.t' C 1 4. --.4- st'','L CL 2/`?c:/% �; , :L`L lt-c,,c-(l LcLE . / 1J /L J' I ... N7.4- 12ct/:!. ek•-rtr? .4.-e kr:7-6.-- rent 4--et"-!-• .dt,11..:.- ••<')Le,4`12"?-(e141-; . ,„.,/ -1,11 ' (7--, .3.-1.,rze- -9 A..1 44---?. ult -76 Az, ctt. _4,6 4, ,c :_, i j a /7 ,9 ,-Y : alLA _rety 6:11.4? ‹Atz--11,-7,2•Lefv_t_ce„..,, 4.,ce. /6"... ,/tifut.-1 a/tzet, ,K,,a' -"t l‘ts•-ii.V.-4/, Ce-ey-7d4_,,,A__ei Le -7,... if 6 6) 7// . ,92-- 1 ,i..- , ,......" / r • ..e.......eer 7,1-4-4_4„,,-7 ..„, .,1,_t17 7:y....:7.: _c- ',.. 1 / • 74; /_-)e-t1izh, -. .c---z,e_ ,ti-t-e.' ( a.ed,e- ,--(7-e /:-.2 •1 /2-4-1Le-j, IA -.-?-t-i---,-;-e-7-j, (,77 .1.-_ / r e - t. 12.4_,Lz. 4:>L--M.e; ..„.64- fr.l.„„. t --...,t.-...---r--t. /24..€ 11.6•4:;C: 7/ /, (7) i(%- •y2 4(C%Z.eTZ' ./..i/.7.7.ett:(7,---,.. _ ...,.. a ILZ et )4=1./ Ct.- ...‹,.1% , •7*.• it -7,t_._ .,"..,c'—(6-ft."-4.-77) A.614-71-I L4.--t c. ,,-.2--'e---;:..'..--•--41: • . 7 1 i. . ..z f_ li ,...... t c-,1- 7 t 4.,,.1 ..e c-e..e-? q--( Zi-r7• /.- -c1:-/s-ltr.:' -2--?:e f‘'';Z.1_- 12- -../41:-.::, A-A-c It, . -e-,..'et-ik..c..., t°7t-s-? ...!....=‘," 7.677--( le 4 e 1-- 1.,-- r - ._ --i- . ,,,,z1.-6/ , . t • .11,1 /7-(..,..L..,1_,AA- 7%-c'. (IC-7)1--;ILL -1-1--L(-7 A--../ c c ),-iikk.4,„ a_ -E;•--,L. . (..f.' ;VI- C'=Tr (.;_c?'i 6 7‘-1.- c ( r":•-f- -ti --'=-C.--?.. .7i.7.-C '; t f. 'L-c'et .Iit _If' el ,c-, ,C.K'' ,A:1„ a r ('e•::;_,1., t :"L 774: i el 't. rL 6 -7 i.t,,,.' • ,- ii/LZ. 1%2L L' ( •_)-1: 1 a-e) j4 2-71j-c- • ‘i '?-7- 1 .4terr -e_et, ..-z-x.:„. , , j, , 4 • / 1---(1 k z ,,.t.4.-,I.c/ .....;,,„:.%7.,*?.-.7 ;I ...L •••--t•/L.., , (.?"/..7 LA S„ i rt/Lt( 4./"C Yt-e4• r•- (-2.41-e .,(/ .e---Le ,/L ?'Lk ,41 .4'Le Fil . sel_.{.C . !"_, 1-(-- , . 3• ! .„;4... ..--a. ?... tli LA-12 v/k-a..4.- a 'e`z-621/ e'-?,-• s.,:c ,itx t:I-i-e I I/. ' fi7e2.1 /‘. i; _.);Le'' -7 - o I, II; „St, ' 1/AA:1 _,.tve _-(4) . .1-e7-t---..-tc-ot-(fo,-1...kt:-.--g,,e, • ,c.,_ et "4 t'A-lirl' 6 ez cyl“.t.--,,,Lc-7,1-.„..e.e•'rat' , 72-tty a•Cirt- 71-/-lef--, 2-tilt4-41.- - 4.141, _/..eit_e_e_ cr. 7 ni._ ()( .,,-. , 74' e'?e,C&'1-e-t-i•x-r ____ ) 24 (?../u7 it. retArt.4 Z?: &--(_y er(W:e ,,,, ' ..2,/ A'ELte reticite61 44_ /.4-( ->-/-)c"1,--ci ')17? (WA e'l a 1-) - ... , -,,---/ -d t _ - (.-i.-( • 4.(„, .,c..., J.'1 •!/11-12 C7'(-7--/ /- • / ( / ((..,, e 1(.,,/, iLy ,Li (...e.../E-&-!..L-7...: :-,/ ,),e....•,, .4 4.4/ -r- 71 •/t 1-"a .1A-771- (.! Z' 1/7 ,'- :-?"- .-C , / ) 4" • — / _. .......r, i,..-c.k ,,4.. ... . , . • / , (" ' -). ,./ / • ,_, ( • (i ,: i.. • ' -)0 rt --/// 41 )A-L-teA-e- / P s 1 , 4 ' , 74,L, i-d-eZ/Vele /rid -z ,-hdlt.Lvi7La 4-e= 2 7 1/ /..zeY/.7 • ete a 7-te te a if-d? 24 a-7n/ -r ‘te a--/tee/::A1 1,t2t-767, cy:f-Akt •(%;2 41, . ty) v Ae 4 1, A (. TO: Mayor and Council FROM: John Frane DATE: March 22, 1984 RE: Refinancing of MIDB'S - Valley tPlace e4Office Associates $1,200,000 - R The project was given final approval in I982. The proponents are asking the City to approve a refinancing of the project; s the need nc fcinga requires the same procedures as an original approval, hearing. The City attorney has approved the documentation. Resolution 84-36 is attached for your consideration. It should be noted that because of the uncertainty of legislation concerning IDR'S, particularity concerning per capita limitations/we do not know if this project can be refinanced as an IDR or if a refinancing will count against a per capital limit. I therefore suggest the council amend resolution B4-36 to provide for a review of this request before final approval and after it is known what effects the pending legislation has on the City. After some discussion, Member introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. NV(' RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL AND DETERMINING TO PROCEED WITH THE REFINANCING OF A PROJECT'UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, REFERRING THE PROPOSAL TO THE MINNESOTA ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the Municipality) , as follows: SECTION 1 Recitals and Findings 1.1. This Council has received a proposal that the Municipality issue its commercial development revenue bonds or notes (whether bonds or notes, hereinafter called the "Bonds") to refund the City's outstanding $1,200,000 Commercial Develop- ment Revenue Note (Valley Place Offices Associates), dated November 25, 1981 (the Original Note). The Original Note was issued to provide funds to be loaned to Valley Place Offices Associates, a Minnesota partnership (the Borrower), to construct a commercial office complex of approximately 21,000 square feet (the Project) located at 9977-9979 Valley View Road in the Municipality. 1.2. At a public hearing, duly. noticed and held on March , 1984, in accordance with the Act, on the proposal to undertake the refinancing, all parties who appeared at the hearing were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to said proposal. Based on such hearing and such other facts and circumstances as this Council deems relevant, this Council hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: (a) The Municipality is authorized by the Act to issue its revenue bonds to refund outstanding bonds • previously issued pursuant to the Act. (b) The refinancing of the Project would help preserve the tax and employment base of the Municipality and would further the general purposes contemplated and described in Section 474.01 of the Act. SECTION 2 Determination to Proceed with the Refinancing and Issuance of the Bonds 2.1. It is desirable for the Municipality to issue the Bonds under the provisions of the Act in the principal amount of $1,200,000 to refund the Original Note. 2.2. It is hereby determined to grant preliminary approval to and to proceed with the refinancing and the issuance of the Bonds, and this Council hereby declares its present intent to have the Municipality issue the Bonds under the Act to refund the Original Note. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the adoption of this resolution shall not be deemed to establish a legal obligation on the part of the Municipality or its City Council to issue or to cause the issuance of the Bonds. The Municipality retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and, accordingly, not issue the Bonds should the Municipality at any time prior to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest of the Municipality not to issue the Bonds or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction. All details of the Bonds and the provisions for payment thereof shall be subject to final approval by the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority and may be subject to such further conditions as the Municipality may specify. The Bonds, if issued, shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the Municipality, except the Project, and each Bond, when, as and if issued, shall recite in substance that the Bond, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenues received from the Project and property pledged to the payment thereof and shall not constitute a debt of the Municipality within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. 2.3. The Application to the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority, with attachments, is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute said documents in behalf of the Municipality. SECTION 3 3.1. If the Bonds are issued and sold, the Munici- pality will enter into a lease, sale or loan agreement or similar agreement satisfying the requirements of the Act (the Revenue Agreement) with the Borrower. The lease rentals, installment sale payments, loan payments or other amounts payable by the Borrower to the Municipality under the Revenue Agreement shall be sufficient to pay the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, on the Bonds as and when the same shall become due and payable. 3.2. The Borrower has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all direct and indirect costs incurred by the Municipality in connection with the financing, whether or not the issue is approved by the Energy and Economic Develop- ment Authority, and whether or not the Municipality by resolu- tion authorizes the issuance of the Bonds, shall be paid by the Borrower on request. 3.3. All commitments of the Municipality expressed herein are subject to the condition that within twelve months of the date of adoption of this resolution the Municipality and the Borrower shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the Revenue Agreement, the Bonds and of the other instruments and proceedings relating to the Bonds and their issuance and sale. If the events set forth herein do not take place within the time set forth above, or any extension thereof, and the Bonds are not sold within such time, this resolution shall expire and be of no further effect. Adopted this day of March, 1984. Mayor Attest: City Clerk (SEAL) The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. . /3 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #84-51 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF VALLEY VIEW MANOR HOMES FOR SUNRISE PROPERTIES BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Valley View Manor Homes for Sunrise Properties, dated March 21, 1984, consisting of 20 acres for 112 manor home units, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of , 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • A. VALLEY VIEW MANOR HOMES, by Sunrise Properties. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 and Preliminary Plat of 20 acres for 112 units in 14 condominium buildings. Location: North of Valley View Road, 1/4 mile East of Mitchell Road. A continued public hearing. Mr. Dave Hansing, engineer for the proponent, reviewed the amended plans with the Commission. He pointed out the additional covered and uncovered parking spaces, the addition of elevation detail, a /9 Planning Commission Minutes 2 February 27, 1984 third alternative elevation style for the structures, the effect of removal of one structure and the relocation of the remaining structures, and the additional landscaping for the project. Planner Franzen reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report for this project, as revised. Marhula questioned whether there would be a westerly entrance with a median cut on Valley View Road, accessing the property. Planner Enger responded that there would be a median cut; however, it did not align with the right-in, right-out entrance to the property on the south side of Valley View Road. Marhula expressed concern for the circuitous access to the rear units of Building #2 of Block 2. Mr. Hansing responded that, in their opinion, this was the best alternative for servicing of these units as it would allow for less disturbance of the wooded knoll. Planner Franzen added that Staff had reviewed this alternative, also, but had determined that it would take a greater amount of grading to accomplish. Therefore, the proposed plan was more acceptable. Torjesen asked if the access along the west property line had been aligned with the project to the west. Planner Franzen stated that it was off-set 180 ft. from the access for the project to the west, which was acceptable to the Engineering Department. Planner Enger stated that the garage situation was a difficult one to deal with as the option of garages was tied to fact that more than one owner needed 'to request an second garage. The extra garages were proposed to be built in buildings that would contain three or four stalls; therefore, at least three or four owners would need to request an extra garage before the garage structure would be built. Staff suggested that perhaps the City could request the developer to sell at least 25% of the units with extra garages, therefore guaranteeing the availability of the extra garages to a certain number of future owners. Marhula asked if the proposed locations for extra garages encroached upon the proposed locations for uncovered parking spaces. Staff responded that, in some cases, it could. Staff added that in . one of the projects where the City had requested, and developer had planned for, extra parking space and garages, it had been found that the project tenant mix was different than expected and that more parking spaces were still needed. It was Staff's concern that this not happen in the future. Marhula asked what the number of uncovered spaces per unit was for the project. Staff responded that it was approximately 1.75 unobstructed parking spaces per unit, without counting the space available in front of the garage within the driveway. f Planning Commission Minutes 3 February 27, 1984 Hallett that garages should agreed with beStaff built atathis timet a . Chairman percentage of the additional Chairman Bearman asked for comments and questions from members of the audience. There were none. MOTION 1: • Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Torjesen, to close the public hearing. Motion carried--6-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Hallett, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Sunrise Properties for unitsZoning District change from (14) buildings ato bel to Rknown ValleyasM-6.5 rcondominium 112 View Manor Homes, based on revised plans dated February 16, and February 17, 1984, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report of February 17, 1964, with the addition of Item #3E. to read: Extra garages shall be provided for 25% of the units upon initial construction of the project with developer required to sell at least 25%of the units with extra garages. Motion carried--6-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Hallett, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Sunrise Properties for Preliminary Plat of 20 acres for 112 condominium units in fourteen (14) buildings, to be known as Valley View Manor Homes, based on revised plans dated February 16, and February 17, 1984, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report of February 17, 1984, providedwith e fordition 25% off theemunits upon initialtra garages constructionhaloflbe the project with developer required to sell at least 25% of the units with extra garages. Motion carried--6-0-0 0 Planning Commission Minutes 3 January 23, 1984 these responsibilities, assessment of the costs back to the owners. Motion carried--5-0-0 B. VALLEY VIEW MANOR HOMES, by Sunrise Properties. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 and Preliminary Plat of 20 acres for 120 units in 15 condominium buildings. Location: North of Valley View Road, 1/4 mile East of Mitchell Road. A public hearing. Mr. David Hansing, engineer for proponent, reviewed the proposed plan with the Commission, pointing out significant site features and plan characteristics. He also presented slides of a similar project including the units proposed for the project. Mr. Hansing responded to several of the recommendations of the Staff Report. He stated that the did not feel it was a good idea to add free-standing garages to the plans, as they tend to invite vandalism. Pulling units away from the southwest knoll on the site would be difficult for the developer, in that the material from the knoll was needed to balance the remaining portions of the site for grading. Staff reviewed the recommendations of the Staff Report regarding the project. Marhula asked if the rear elevation was intended to be the "front" entrance for four of the units. Mr. Hansing stated that this was so. Mr. Hansing stated that.the developer would expect to be able to use the southwest wooded knoll for development, if the City would require more parking spaces, garages, and no units to be placed on the southeast knoll; otherwise, the developer would plan to dedicate the land to the City for park purposes as suggested by the City. Marhula asked for Staff's reasons for recommending no buildings be located on the southeast knoll. Staff responded that the southeast knoll should be saved to help separate the project from Valley View Road. Marhula asked what the developer's experience had been with the sales of these units. Mr. John Voisika, proponent, responded that, in a similar project, the average sales were one a day, which, in their opinion, was pointing to a need for this type of unit in the community. Johannes asked about the size of the individual units. Mr. Voisika responded that the units ranged from 832 sq. ft. to 1,004 sq. ft., depending on the number of bedrooms in the floor plan. Johannes asked for an explanation of the park/density transfer situation with this proposal. Staff explained that the City owned the ponding area to the northeast of the project and had paid for it 'Jit) Planning Commission Minutes 4 January 23, 1984 previously. If the City wanted to maintain a portion of this project area for park purposes, the City would be required to "pay" for it in some way. One of the ways would be a density transfer from the park property to the remainder of the land. Hallett stated that he felt it was important to accommodate the proposed lower cost housing which would be provided by this project. He stated that he was concerned about traffic on Valley View Road, as well as the view of this project from Valley View Road. Hallett suggested that a compromise be worked out with respect to the dedication of the southeast wooded knoll area. Planner Enger stated that, regarding free-standing garages, it had been the City's experience with multiple projects that more garage space was necessary for these types of projects, due to the number of garages which became storage space for recreational vehicles, etc., or workshop space. Hallett asked the developer what his response was regarding the addition of free-standing garages to the development. Mr. Voisika stated that he preferred not to have them because of the poor views these buildings would provide while driving through the site, as well as potential for vandalism. Gartner suggested that the buildings, especially along Valley View Road, could be "reversed" to have the front elevations facing the public roads. Johannes stated that he agreed with Hallett regarding the safety of Valley View Road traffic and the views from Valley View Road of the project. to negotiate He athedded thet he, too, felt park dedication issue regardingthei ty should try southwest wooded oded knoll. Mr. Kevin Blohm, 7465 Scott Terrace, stated that he was concerned about the lack of variety of elevations for the project. He stated that he felt it would be important to provide such variety for this type of structure and project. As a builder, he had found that the developments were much more attractive if this was done. MOTION 1: Motion was made Hallett, seconded by Johannes, to continue the public the developer time to redesign the plans per the concerns of artohe next ang lanssion ting to alw the Commission and Staff. Motion carried--5-0-0 re DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 `•���°' HENNEPIN • J35-3381 Jr_• t_ January 20, 198 • Mr. Chris Enger • Director of Planning City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Mr. Enger: RE Proposed Plat — "Valley View Manor Hanes" Future CSAH 39 (Valley View Rd) Approx. 330 Ft. W. of Schooner Blvd Section 10, Township 116, Range 22 Hennepin County No. 1152 Review and Recommendations Minn rota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and found it acceptable with consideration of these conditions: —No additional right of way required by Hennepin County in the area of this plat at this time. —The proposed westerly access, a right in — right out street, is acceptable to • Hennepin County. —Any proposed access to this roadway requires an approved Hennepin County entrance permit before beginning any construction. See our Traffic Division for entrances permit forms. —All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes but is not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. See our Maintenance Division for utility permit forms. —The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within County right of way. Please direct any response or questions to Les Weigelt. Sincerely, //77e./16() apes M. Wold, P.E. ," Chief, Planning and Programming area/LDW:pl HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opporlunlly employer STAFF REPORT ' TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner ThROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: February 17, 1984 PROJECT: Valley View Manor Homes LOCATION: North of Valley View Road, east of Edonvale Apartments APPLICANT & FEE OWNER: Sunrise Properties REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 2. Preliminary Plat of 19.41 acres for 112 condominium units Background The Planning Commission continued y�. li \ this item from their January 23, � �j _ .2 1 1984, meeting for revisions accord- }�,` ,33 1 l- ing to the January 20, 1984, Staff acre.' "_-I' i Report. The proponent has revised _ii3.:r ON 79-18 the development plans and submitted 1 0_sr� plans dated February 15, 1984. The overall number of units has been ,,.-� ._:',1' reduced from 120 to 112 and the site z1 ' plan has been revised taking into RM - RM-65 \•. - '/, consideration recommendations of the 25 j 81-16 i` Planning Commission relative to 2 / 3 . provision of additional open space, . ,. �� :i; '� 5 retention of the earth mound along :419 4)9 r�i�1:�1- 27�1 Valley View Road as a screen, PUB t ) - ; � PUB provision of additional parking —` spaces, including potential free- 81-I standing garages and uncovered . spaces, provision of additional • RM-2.5 ':'ti:_ landscaping within the front yards, 28 '_ .;.-. and provision of alternative and C COMw ;r` mac more detailed building treatments :? :_, ; for side and rear elevations. ,,:max I Site Plan 2 79-35 I1 oFc PRU 1 The January 20, 1984, Staff Report b , i identified a tight relationship i 1,,81-22 S11 i? ytv-'L between building and parking areas t�, bOFC '.: fi' r Valley View Manor Homes 2 February 17, 1984 in the center portion of the project. The overall site plan has been reduced by one building (eight units). However, one building has been moved to the wooded knoll, which was not utilized in previous plans. These changes allow two building to be removed from within the loop and solves a number of problems. Much of the existing earth mound along Valley View Road is retained and views from units across parking areas have been minimized through re-orientation of buildings, utilization of grade changes, and provision of additional screening. Parking The January 20, 1984, Staff Report suggested that the development plans be modified to provide for 60 additional parking spaces, of which 30 should be garages. The site plan has been modified to provide 32 detached garage spaces in various locations of the project, as well as the provision of two additional uncovered parking spaces per unit for the entire project. There are, however, units which have not been allocated additionals. These are buildings #2 and #3, Block 4. The site plan should be modified to provide additional spaces for each of these units. Specific architectural plans for the garages have not been provided; however, they should be architecturally compatible with the manor home units. The proponent intends to market the garages as options rather than constructing them with the units. Landscaping The landscape plan has been revised in accordance with recommendations of the Planning Commission and Staff. Note that additional berming and screening has been introduced throughout the site, as well as a more liberal application of plant materials. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent should submit to Staff a detailed landscape plan identifying the type, size, quantity, and method of installation. The landscape plan should also identify in more detail the extent of berming proposed within the front yards. Architecture Additional building elevations have been submitted for the side and rear exteriors of the manor home units. Commissioners will recall that the initial submittal included side and rear elevations that did not reflect as much consideration for detail as the front elevations. Revised side and rear elevations show considerably more attention to detail, and attempt to break up the flatness of the wall by projections including extension of roof lines and balconies. The proponent has submitted three alternative building plans. Staff recommends that no two building elevations would be the same side by side, or across from each other. Zoning Current RM-6.5 District regulations allow a maximum density of 6.7 units per acre. Normal park dedication would be 1.9 acres, leaving 17.51 acres available for density. When figured on 17.51 acres, the density is 6.39 units per acre and 6,810 square feet of land area per unit. The development plans indicate compliance with minimum district setback requirements relative to front, rear, and side yards. Valley View Manor Homes 3 February 17, 1984 RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the request for zoning from Rural to RM-6.5, and preliminary plat of 19.41 acres for 112 condominium units, based on plans dated February 15, 1984, subject to the following: 1. Prior to City Council, proponent shall revise development plans to provide additional parking spaces for buildings 2 and 3, Block 4. 2. Prior to final plat, proponent shall: A. Provide sidewalks meeting City specifications along the interior loop road. B. Provide for appropriate pedestrian/vehicle access to the City park as recommended by the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Comnission. C. Provide a tot lot facility, with the location to be determined by the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. D. Provide erosion and slope stabilization plans for review. E. Provide color samples for exterior treatments of all unit types for review. F. Meet all applicable Engineering Department requirements relative to utilities, roads, erosion control, and storm water run-off. G. Convey land proposed for dedication through the final plat, clear of any mortgages, liens, assessments, taxes, or encumberances. 3. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Receive approval of the grading and drainage plans from Purgatory Creek Watershed District. B. Provide a detailed landscape plan, prepared in accordance with the City requirements, subject to Staff approval, noting tree type, quantity, size, and method of installation. C. Submit a street lighting plan prepared in accordance with City requirements, noting type, size, height, and location. D. Submit an overall development plan identifying the unit type for each of the manor home buildings. i STAFF REPORT • TO: Planning Commission FROM: Mike Franzen, Senior Planner TROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning • DATE: January 20, 1984 PROJECT: Valley View Manor Homes LOCATION: North of Valley View Road, East of Edenvale Apartments APPLICANT & FEE OWNER: Sunrise Properties REQUESTS: 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 2. Preliminary Plat of 19.41 acres for 120 condominium units Background Sunrise Properties is proposing a 120-unit manor home development consisting of 15 (eight-unit) condominium buildings. All units are two bedrooms ranging in size from 832-1,150 sq. ft. One attached garage space is provided for each unit. The Comprehensive Guide Plan identifies a medium density residential land use for this property of up to 10 units per acre. The proposed rezoning to RM-6.5 would be consistent with the Guide Plan. Surrounding land use patterns indicate a park area to the north, future medium density residential housing to the east, future office- industrial land use to the south, and a medium density residential land use to the west of the project. Directly west of this project site is the Edenvale Apartments. The Commission will be entertaining a request for Edenvale Apartments 2nd Addition at a future Planning Commission meeting. Existing natural conditions indicate a sloping of the land away from Valley View Road to a City park area north of the project. The grade change from Valley View Road to the proposed park area is a drop in elevation from 880 to 846, or 34 ft. The eastern portion of the property is characterized by a proposed ponding area and a tree-covered knoll, which rises to an elevation of 888, or approximately 30 ft. above the road grade on Valley View Road. Immediately adjacent to Valley View Road exists a significant land form, which provides a natural screening of the lower area of the site from Valley View Road and from future adjacent industrial land uses to the south of Valley View Road. Zoning r Current RM-6.5 District regulations allow a maximum density of 6.7 units per acre. The proposal is for 8.8 units per acre when based on 10.62 acres of developable land with 8.7 acre of land set aside for density, park, and ponding purposes. Normal tf • Valley View Manor Homes 2 January 20, 1984 park dedication would be 1.9 acres, leaving 17.51 acres available for density. When ' figured on 17.51 acres the density is 6.85 units per acre and 6,356 sq. ft. of land area per unit. When figured upon 10.6 net acres of land, there would be 3,800 sq. feet of land area per unit. The development plans indicate compliance with the minimum district setback requirements relative to front, rear, and side yards. • Open Space • • The site plan recognizes the opportunity for utilization of existing natural features by preserving the wooded knoll on the east portion of the site. Another opportunity would be to take advantage of the existing earth mound adjacent to Valley View Road. This can serve to screen potential adverse affects of adjacent future industrial land uses to the south, provide a pleasing back yard space for the units, and reduce the scale of the project by providing only glimpses of the total development area from Valley View Road. (See Attachement A) Adequate open spaces exist between most of the units. However, in the center of the plan, there are tight areas and some objectionable views of parking areas from some of the units. (See Attachment B) • Retention of the earth mound as a natural feature and fewer units in the center.of the site may provide a better land utilization and more visually pleasing open space between units. •Landscaping/Architecture Three alternative front and rear elevations are proposed for the manor home units. Only one side elevation is proposed. While considerable attention to detail has been given to front, rear, and side treatments, the side and rear treatments are comparatively plain. In addition, rear and side building elevations are relatively one-dimensional. This, coupled with the fact that the typical manor home unit requires a level building pad area of B0 ft. by 70 ft., produces a visually boring flat space. This flat space, or plain, can be made visually pleasing by a liberal application of berming and plantings to blend the units into the site, or break up the facades with relief or projections. Utilities Sewer and water service are available to this project by connection to a twelve-inch water main and an eight-inch sewer main, both in Valley View Road. Capacity of both utilties is adequate to accomnodate this project. Grading A considerable amount of grading is proposed in order to accommodate the manor home ir development. Attention should focus on two critical areas--removal of a natural earth mound along Valley View Road and severity of slope between the proposed internal road and Edenvale II Park. The-earth mound should be retained as a landscape feature for screening purposes, and the slope transition between road and park property be of minimal to moderate grade. 1 l Valley View Manor Homes 3 January 20, 1984 • Pedestrian Sstems There is an existing five-foot concrete sidewalk along the north side of Valley View Road. Provision for a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk should be made along the internal loop road. Parks The closest neighborhood park is Edenvale II Park, adjacent and north of the subject project area. Park plans are tentatively for football, softball, hockey, and tennis activities. Appropriate pedestrian and/or vehicle access should be provided to this park. The development proposal indicates provisions for dedication of land area for park purposes. Acceptability of this land area is to be determined by the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. Considering the size of this project, provisions for a tot lot should be made. Location and type of facilities would be determined by the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Comnission. A possibility would be construction of a tot lot for this development by the developer on the wooded knoll. (. Parking City Code currently requires two parking spaces per unit with one enclosed. For 120 units, the development proposes 180 spaces, 120 of which are garages. Code requires provision for 240 spaces. A parking space, by definition, must be unobstructed. Therefore, the area in front of a garage generally should not be considered as a space since it blocks access to the garage. The Staff has made recommendations regarding the percentage of credit which might be given to the space behind a garage based upon the specific characteristics of a project. Although up to 50% credit for the space behind the garage has worked in projects with large areas of common parking, parking areas in this project are distributed throughout the project and do not allow as much overflow flexibility. Staff suggests that a 0.25 space/unit credit be given for space in front of garages to satisfy a portion of the required one unenclosed space per unit requirement. Therefore, the development plan should provide 0.75 spaces per unit, or 90 unenclosed stalls. Since the development plan currently provides for 60 spaces, 30 additional spaces should be provided. Since there are no provisions for basements in any of the units, one can assume that a certain number of garages will be used for storage or workshop projects for some period of time. Staff recommends that 30 additional spaces be designed for detached garage space, either to be sold with a unit, or provisions made for in the development plan for conversion of unenclosed spaces to detached garage spaces in the future. ( Commission, in the past, has expressed a legitimate concern for the provision of additional garage spaces over and above the minimum requirements under RM zoning districts. To that end, the building plan should reflect a provision for additional detached garage units in appropriate areas of the site, architecturally compatible with the proposed manor home units, and landscaped in accordance with the overall scheme for planting design. • Valley View Manor Homes 4 January 20, 1984 RECOMMENDATIONS • Planning Staff recommends the following alternative recommendations for consideration by the Planning Commission: Alternative #1: Planning Commission could recommend approval of the zoning district change from Rural to RM-6.5 and preliminary plat subject to the folloiwng conditions: 1. Prior to City Council review, proponent shall: A. Modify the development plans, reflecting a reduction buildings to utilize the existing land form along Valley View Road as a natural screen, and provision of additional open space on site. 8. Modify the landscape plan to reflect consideration for berming and plantings within the front yards and additional screening along Valley View Road. C. Provide alternative side building elevations comparable in detail to front elevation treatments. D. Provide a homeowners' association document for review. The document should include provisions for excluding exterior storage of recreational vehicles. • E. Revise the development plans to reflect consideration for additional parking including detached garages and uncovered spaces. 2. Prior to final plat, proponent shall: A. Receive approval of grading and drainage plans from Purgatory Creek Watershed District. 8. Provide sidewalks meeting City specifications along the interior loop road. C. Provide for appropriate pedestrian/vehicle access to the City Park as recommended by the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. D. Provide for a tot lot facility, with the location to be determined by the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. E. Provide erosion and slope stabilization plans for review. F. Provide color samples for exterior treatments of all unit types for review. G. Revise the grading plan, showing modification of the sloped area between the road and park property to a gradual slope. The slope shall also be appropriately landscaped. Valley View Manor Homes 5 January 20, 1984 H. Meet all applicable engineering requirements relative to utilities, roads, erosion control, and storm water run-off. 3. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall: • A. Convey land proposed for dedication. B. Provide a detailed landscape plan prepared in accordance with City requirements, subject to Staff approval, noting tree type, quantity, • size, and method of installation. C. Submit a street lighting plan, prepared in accordance with City requirements, noting type, size, height, and location. Alternative 2: Planning Commission could recommend denial of the zoning district change from Rural to RM-6.5 and the preliminary plat. Alternative 3: Planning Commission could return the development plans to the proponent in order that the project be revised in accordance with stipulations as identified under Alternative #1. k Staff recommends consideration for Alternative #1. • • • / I l • • •�iw.�..,, ,•'� 5 53.o�s� `' f t • '••• _ •- I/ `. � tip, ._ ��, �• �: ..... 1 ,..:,",,( . .'.-6,260.,.. '•,, •.,.. \ ::,,, „, . ... ....;i9:11,\ •.,..\ . . • / , ------\\ ./-1,../.. v- t . \ \ 0 1.I /. , • '• N r'7, .N•.. 1 1 • • n 7o.lzs • • ' —r r—v _ -: :--! ..... .... — ` girl"1., !•-ti_ - ..--- --. = f � '`j • tvtw , .. • • i.J.7`//1/�/�/EA OF 1 l%�I� I • /rL W.) • 3},875 - I • Wit../ l•. • • • • • • ,>•,• 1,;, , ••• •••-i .-..v./ - -..\ V// / , • is �',�_�\\ . -- :-•- - _ ••, '. 1. .... i..... • \;.`,mac,: ✓ �' • s,. - . ` -, • : . ‘ \\ .•-":N"\'' \\1. '''.--- - -- \ t; \... ,.� \ /i` '',i ram: t ! }I 1` j •!s ~ `.. , _ • p lea 7so' .. � r__......... _.. - ,1�� ) V-1_L,.V_____.7 ti -.., -_"' . - - -,..------ I �_'- - t. __ _ _ ___._� ,_��-;��..._�''}"-�-_'•.. A • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #84-52 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PAULSEN'S 2ND ADDITION FOR DIRLAM DEVELOPMENT BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Paulsen's 2nd Addition for Dirlam Development, dated March 5, 1984, consisting of 6.3 acres for 18 single family residential lots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of , 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor • ATTEST: Tohn D. Frane, City Clerk D. PAULSEN'S 2ND ADDITION, by Dirlam Development. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 for 6.3 acres and Preliminary Plat of 6.3 acres into 19 single family lots. Location: North of C. 'M. St. Paul and Pacific Railroad, south of Hidden Ponds Park. A public hearing. Mr. Dennis Dirlam, proponent, reviewed the site characteristics and design features of the project with the Commission. Staff reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report with the Planning Commission, noting the need for absorption of the outlots into the other lots within the plat. Johannes asked if the condition regarding separation of similar units to provide variety within the plat should be included in this project. Other Commissioners concurred. Chairman Dearman asked for questions or comments from members of ( the audience. There were none. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Johannes, to close the C. " • Planning Commission Minutes 10 February 27, 1984 • public hearing. Motion carried--6-0-0 • MOTION 2: • Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Johannes, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request for Zoning Oistrict change from Rural to R1-9.5 for Paulsen's 2nd Addition by Dirlam Development, based on plans and written materials dated February 1, and February 16, 1984, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report of February 24, 1984, with the following added conditions: 2C. Proponent shall submit, prior to final plat, a revised plan showing extension of Paulsen Orive to the park road or Dell Road, whichever is deemed appropriate by the City Engineer; and 3C. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall submit a development plan showing the location of various units in order than no two identical housing types shall be located adjacent to, across from, or diagonally across from each other. Motion carried--6-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Torjesen, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request for Preliminary Plat for Paulsen's 2nd Addition by Dirlam Development for 18 single family lots on 6.2 acres, based on plans and written materials dated • February 1, and February 16, 1984, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report of February 24, 1984, with the following added conditions: 2C. Proponent shall submit, prior to final plat, plans showing extension of Paulsen Drive to the Park road or Dell Road, whichever is de appropriate by the City Engineer; and 3C. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent • shall submit a development plan showing the location of the various units in order that no two housing types shall be located adjacent to, across from, or diagonally across from each other. Motion carried--6-0-0 • • • STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission ' FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger,. Director of Planning DATE: February 24, 1984 PROJECT: Paulsen's 2nd Addition LOCATION: South of Hidden Ponds Park, Northeast of proposed Dell Road extension, North of Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad • APPLICANT: Dirlam Development Company FEE OWNER: Craig R. Morton, and Associates REQUESTS: Rezoning from Rural to R1-9.5 and Preliminary Plat to subdivide 6.2 acres into 18 single family lots Background 5 L ' The Comprehensive Guide Plan identi- t6:�- ,{ 4, lies a. low density residential land 45,i4 - ' 1., _ _[ ;: 1P(3_�'� use for this property for up to 2.5 x � -4. x .-e-, units per acre. The site is ,� . ; T bordered on the north by the ,_ h- � proposed Paulsen's 1st Addition (R1- . 13.5), and Hidden Ponds Park, to the '•- "- ,,1 K , _ .3 - west b future Autumn Woods Addition 'f-� , t r / ,- RI- R1-13.5 and to the south b the y_-/ 'r� Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul 45 1 56. .4j y ^ t;Railroad. .' 5‘ . Site topography consists of low, 61tS sc1,od --) rr irregular knolls within the existing ✓ . , 77 '• . 9 00 low area on the south edge of the —w.�L(/' :;, :„,::;- v site, which presently drains over- IU �y{� '-tl-- '� land to the southwest along railroad "" '- ty3 81 ,,� �' Jti.: -P right-of-way, through an existing Ina "; - •I35 0 ,, °° 36-inch culvert, under the railroad tracks, and eventually into Mitchell • • i Lake. '" y 81-t5 PROPOSED SITE The site has some existing oak trees 1 RM-6 5 along the north and west property s A lines, but otherwise is open. Many �,, of these trees arc proposed to be i ZI preserved as indicated by the AE-�+E"r.. 1� LOCATION MAP 6_� ha LOCATION�JI1`1 �Vl/1K'I 2 •CiT MTh IT I t„_ Paulsen's 2nd Staff Report 2 February 2t , 1984 preliminary grading plans. Along the railroad right-of-way there is some scrub vegetation, which will also be preserved. Guide Plan/Ordinance Requirements Current R1-9.5 District regulations allow a maximum of 3.5 units per acre, but only in areas where that density is consistent with the Guide Plan. The current proposal is for 2.9 units per acre, based on 6.2 acres of developable land. Although the Comprehensive Guide Plan refers to Low Density Residential development for up to 2.5 units per acre, consideration for higher density in this location may have merit, if the lot sizes are adequate enough to provide for a variety of building sizes and architectural treatments. Though normally a density in excess of the Comprehensive Guide Plan would necessitate a Guide Plan change, one could consider the Paulsen's 2nd Addition consistent with the Guide Plan, if densities of the 1st and 2nd Additions are combined. The combined overall density of the two additions is 2.4 units per acre. (Paulsen's 1st Addition--1.9 dwelling units per acre, Paulsen's 2nd Addition--2.9 dwelling units per acre) A particular problem with R1-9.5 zoning is that typically lots are platted with the minimum 55 ft. frontage, which severely limits the amount of flexibility in building styles that can be built within current setback limitations, resulting in a project where the buildings have a tendency to look very similar. Variations on lot size and street frontage can introduce a greater variety of housing types and facades within a project area, which can add enough visual interest to support the increase in density. The Commission should note that the large-scale preliminary plat differs from the reduction in the proponent's information packet. Staff suggested that the developer revise his development plans to incorporate variable lot sizes and street frontages. Even though some of the lots have street frontages of only 55 ft. in width, at the setback line, the lot width is approximately 65 ft. The amount of buildable area between minimum setbacks is 50 ft. Comparatively speaking, on a standard R1-13.5 lot with a minimum of 70 ft. of frontage, there is only 45 ft. between building setbacks. Staff believes that the variable frontages, larger lot sizes, and less restrictive setbacks, may allow variety in building size and style. Architecture and building size is extremely important when considering requests for higher density single family zoning (R1-9.5). It is current City policy to require the developer to provide an overall development plan which depicts the varying unit types on individual lots within a project. The proponent has not identified a builder or architect as yet, and unit types and unit designs have not been submitted for review at this time. The proponent has indicated that a site plan showing the proposed facade of each house will be submitted to City Staff in compliance with City policy. The minimum lot size within this project is 9,758 sq. ft. and the maximum lot size is 20,130 sq. ft. The average lot size within this project is 12,75D sq. ft. Outlots Several lot remnants, including Lot 7, Block 1, and Lots 14 and 15, Block 2, are proposed to be combined with lots in the adjacent Paulsen's 1st Addition. In addition, Outlet A of Paulsen's 1st Addition is proposed to be combined with Lot 12, Block 2, Paulsen's 2nd Addition in order to meet the minimum frontage requirements. Paulsen's 2nd Staff Report 3 February 24, 1984 IL According to existing subdivision regulations, all remnants of lots below minimum size left over after subdividing of a larger tract, must be added to adjacent lots, or plans shown as to the future use, rather than allowed to remain as unusable parcels. Though the proponent is indicating a combination of these lot remnants with adjacent lots in Paulsen's 1st Addition, Staff believes that there are problems associated with this method on combination. 1. Staff has encountered situations in the past where owners of adjacent lots did not wish to exercise their option to purchase the additional piece of property; therefore the property became tax forfeited and was not maintained. 2. Staff has encountered another situation where adjacent property owners purchased a lot remnant, but did not combine it with their existing lot. This results in two tax statements. Often, it is the case that a particular land owner may not decide to pay the taxes on this additional piece of property, resulting in tax forfeiture and no maintenance of the parcel. To avoid these particular problems, the final plat for Paulsen's 1st Addition can be revised such that the lot remnants are incorporated into the adjacent lots. Secondly, the preliminary plat for Paulsen's 2nd Addition can be revised such that platting is done within the boundary limits of the preliminary plat, absorbing the proposed outlots and adjusting street frontages accordingly. Utilities Sewer and water services are available to this project by connection to an eight- inch sewer main and a six-inch water main extended from Paulsen's 1st Addition along Paulsen Drive. • Access Access to this project will be provided by an extension of Paulsen Drive. Paulsen Drive is currently proposed to intersect with Valley View Road between Parkview Lane and Ticonderoga Trail. Paulsen's Drive is also proposed to be extended to the existing park road entrance to Hidden Ponds Park. This connection should be completed for public safety considerations as part of this development proposal. Parks The closest neighborhood park is Hidden Ponds Park, directly north of the project. No land dedication is involved relative to this development proposal; therefore, a cash park fee will be applicable as determined by the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. Pedestrian Systems Staff recommended a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the north side of Paulsen Drive in Paulsen's 1st Addition. Staff recommends that this five-foot wide concrete 1. sidewalk also be extended through the Paulsen's 2nd Addition along the north side of Paulsen Drive. • J'J�lJ • I Paulsen's 2nd Staff Report 4 �`' February 24j, 1984 `� RECOMMENDATIONS: Planning Staff would recommend approval of the request for rezoning from Rural to R1-9.5 and Preliminary Plat approval for 6.2 acres for 18 single family lots, based on plans dated February 1, and February 16, 1984, subject to the following: 1. Prior to City Council review, proponent shall: • A. Submit amended plans showing a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the north side of Paulsen Drive. B. Submit amended plans, showing absorption of the outlots within the preliminary plat boundaries, making necessary adjustments to the street frontages to meet minimum City Code requirements. Concurrent amendments should be made to the final plat of Paulsen's 1st Addition, eliminating the need for remnant parcels or outlots within either plat. C. Submit plans indicating the construction limits for grading, the proposed location for snow fencing for preservation of existing oak trees on the site, and erosion control methods, to be approved by the Engineering Department. 2. Prior to final plat, proponent shall: A. Submit detailed sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water, and street lans to the Engineering Department for review. p B. Provide a storm water drainage plan to be reviewed and approved by the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District. 3. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee. B. Provide an overall development plan using the plat of the development to indicate the particular unit type, or array of unit types, which could be built on each lot. A front elevation of each unit type keyed to the overall plan should also be included. This information should be submitted to the Planning Department for review. • • t, 1 Yf ' l CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #84-53 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELi11N.M1RY PLAT OF GONYEA 4TH ADDITION GONYEA INVESTMENT (formerly 3rd Addition) BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Gonyea 4th Addition for Gonyea Investment, dated January 12, 1984, consisting of 37.19 acres for 33 single family residential lots and five outlots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of , 1984. W to gang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk l a�' • F. GONYEA 3RD ADDITION. Request for Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for 9.22 acres, and from Rural to R1-9.5 for 3.85 acres; and Preliminary Plat of 37.19 acres into 33 residential lots and five outlots. Location: Northeast quadrant of State Highway #5 and County Road #4. A public hearing. Mr. Gerald Sunde, engineer for proponent, reviewed the request with the Commission, explaining the mixture of uses approved with the Planned Unit Development Concept, including elderly housing, single family housing, and commercial uses. Planner Enger reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report regarding the project as proposed. Mr. Sunde questioned the possibilities of relocating the walkway entering the site from the southeast, meandering towards the north ir area of the property, which skirted the marsh area. He stated that, based on soils information currently available, it appeared that the walkway would be on unstable soils, if located in the position shown on the plans. Staff responded that this would be a decision for the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission; however, the ./ Planning Commission Minutes 12 February 27, 1984 stability of the soils would be taken into consideration. Hallett asked when the proponent planned to begin marketing of these single family lots. Mr. Sunde stated that the marketing would begin in Spring, 1984. Hallett stated that he felt it would be important to place signage on the outlots indicating that the property adjacent to the single family area would be developed as commercial, prior to sale of any of the lots. Torjesen questioned the density of the project. Staff responded that the density was 2.52 units per acre. Torjesen stated that he felt the original Concept Plan, which indicated 31, instead of 33, lots was more appropriate. He recalled that during the public hearing on the Concept Plan, the residents to the north of this property had expressed concern about the density between their existing lots and the proposed lots. Planner Enger stated that, in Staff's opinion, the project was not materially different from the Concept Plan. The number of lots previously shown adjacent to the existing single family units to the north had remained the same as was shown in the Concept Plan. Johannes asked whether it would be appropriate to require that the south tier of lots have a provision requiring similar units to be separated. Staff responded that the width of the lots met the M- t. 13.5 standards, it was the depth of the lots which caused them to be below the R1-13.5 requirements; therefore, this provision may not be necessary in this case. Johannes suggested that perhaps the provision of requiring similar units to be separated should be included in R1-13.5 areas, as well. He pointed out that, in his neighborhood, and others in the City, which were zoned R1-13.5, there were many cases were similar units were placed close to each other, which did not provide for variety within the subdivision. Based on the success of this provision in the R1-9.5 areas of the City, Johannes stated that he felt it Mould be appropriately applied to many other single family detached subdivisions. Gartner suggested that a possible alternative would be to zone all of the lots R1-13.5, requiring the proponent to appear before the Board of Appeals for variances to those lots which did not meet the R1-13.5 standards. Chairman Bearman stated that at the time of the Concept Plan review, it had been required that no commercial development take place until the upgrading of the intersection of Highway #5 and County Road #4 was under construction. He asked Staff what the time table for the completion of the intersection was. Staff responded that it had • been tentatively scheduled for 1986. Mr. Joseph Lawler, 7621 Ontario Boulevard, expressed concern about the storm water holding pond at the southeast portion Of the property. Mr. Sunde explained the permanent improvements which would be made to mitigate the potential flooding of surrounding properties. Mr. Sunde pointed out that the previous improvements had been of a temporary nature. Mr. Lawler also asked where the access to the southeasterly commercial lot would be. Staff responded that, after much study of the situation, a determination had been made to allow access to this commercial site from Highway #5, or a future frontage road along Highway #5. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Johannes, to close the public hearing. Motion carried--6-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Johannes, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Gonyea Investments for Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for 13.07 acres, based on written materials dated January 25, and January 31, 1984, and plans dated January 12, January 20, January 25, and January 31, 1984, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated February 17, 1984, with the following additions: A.9. Prior to final plat, proponent shall receive the required variances for lots not meeting the R1-13.5P Zoning rior o buildingDistrict requirements from the Board of Appeals; permit issuance, proponent shall submit a development plan showing that no two similar housing types shall be located adjacent to, directly across from, or diagonally across from each other for the single family residential area; and 6.4. Prior to sale of any lots, proponent shall post signs indicating the location of the future commercial lots adjacent to the proposed single family area. Motion carried--4-0-2 (Chairman Bearman and Marhula abstained) MOTION 3: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Johannes, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Gonyea Investments for Preliminary Plat of 37.19 acres into 33 residential lots and five outlots for property located at the northeast quadrant of County Road #4 and Highway 115, based on written'materials dated January 25, and January 31, 1984, and plans dated January 12, January 20, January 25, and January 31, 1984, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated February 17, 1984, with the following additions: A.9. Prior to final plat, proponent shall receive the required variances for lots not meeting the required R1-13.5 Zoning District requirements from the Board of Appeals; 6.3. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall submit a development plan • showing that no two similar housing types shall be located adjacent to, directly across from, or diagonally across from each other for the single family residential area; and 6.4. Prior to sale of any lots, proponent shall post signs indicating the location of the future commercial lots adjacent to the proposed single family area. Motion carried--4-1-1 (Torjesen against, Marhula abstained) ,} NESpr4 yo Minn $ a L)) rt111CIit OF Transportationp District 5 D1( s°ti. fS" 2055 No. Lilac Drive OF TA Golden Valley, Minnesota 554'22 (312)54.;3761 March 15, 1984 • Mr. Chris Enger Planning Director City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 S.P. 2701 T.N. 5 Plat review of Gonyca 3rd Addition located in the NE quadrant of TH 5 and CSAN 4 in part of the south half of the southeast quarter of Section 8, Township 116, Range 22 in the City of Eden Prairie, Hennepin County Dear Mr. Enger: We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. We find the plat acceptable for further development with consideration of the following comments: — The existing highway right of way is currently being platted through this area by Mn/DOT. There is an error at CSAN 4 and the land surveyor should contact our District Land Surveyor, Mr. Keith Slater, for information. • — I assume the Hennepin County Department of Transportation is reviewing the plat in regard to CSAN 4. — The concept plan indicates an office building would be built on Outlot D. We feel access to this parcel could be a problem. We suggest that future connections to the streets and businesses located to the east be studied before approval. One suggestinn is to develop a connection along the property line between Outlot D and Prairie Lawn and Garden and connect to Westgate Boulevard along the north line of Prairie Lawn and Garden. Then one common intersection at Fuller Road could be established to serve both north and south sides of TN 5. — Future upgrading of TH 5 will require some additional right of way from this property. However, it is not known at this time how much additional • right of way will be needed. An Lyu,dOppuuunity Employer • i . • Mr. Chris Anger March 15, 1984 Page 2 If you have any questions in regard to this review, please contact Evan Green at ' 545-3761 ext. 119. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, • / ,. 7, . %/):+ W. M. Crawford, P.E. District Engineer • cc: Gerald Isaacs Metropolitan Council Mike Reiter Hennepin County Surveyor's Office • Doug Mattson Hennepin County Dept. of Transportation WMC:bn • • STAFF REPORT • TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning • DATE: February 17, 1984 PROJECT: Gonyea 3rd Addition LOCATION: Northeast quadrant of County Road #4 and Highway #5 APPLICANT & FEE OWNER: Dennis Gonyea REQUEST: Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for 9.22 acres, and from Rural to RM-9.5 for 3.85 acres; and Preliminary Plat of 37.19 acres into 33 residential lots and five outlots Background -" —�..T 80-29 4? In 1980, a Planned Unit Development1 I�t6 R!15 -- ! was approved for this property 78-200-- j � � 3 145 -. involving residential, office, corn- !',% C-COM F11-22t-,r2r..,.y,/ RJ5RAL II mercial, and open space uses as per ..- . materials dated March, 1980. Speci- 8-16 PROPOSED SITE fic development plans included 31 79-13 - re _ q PUB _ II 1 si— single family lots, a 40-unit U-22 1 i —P#�2z elderly building, two sit-down - , ' 'S-'41 „ILL. j 7T1-? ' r .., '� E-_ �l lumen. C restaurants, and approximately 70,- ,. ;.,, 000 sq. ft. of office building �-� �� 1 8-12 • � 7' n-:� ��- development on three separate sites. a2•, 1 PUR °k \ `` - 0..` Plans also included an area for r :,,.,,•, i`.,- ;G,.,.;<^<n:�;.>,.."�` `�� preservation of approximately eight ©.20 ., :o,-. r`. K • \c, acres surrounding property con- PUR OFC` C;Co tw �,'`• ;t �4rs �f.• . sidered by the Department of Natural fQR1 ''`�-y..•1\ :�,`� . • .\;,, 'c ,r� Resources as "public waters. ,�c,_ > PS The Comprehensive Guide Plan identi- 'T%-�`77r;.4yy,,, I. ___21.z/ 17-2 A ?. fies a mixture of uses for the 14f_,1 •.p1. 1 � property involving protection open 322 '810.k AT A_ space, community commercial, office, I/ 326 PSillil , // and medium density residential uses. , The Concept Plan of the proponent is ?5,;'s RM-65ins <-.;:;- • consistent with the Comprehensive .i4 li-� �'r I GEN Guide Plan. The specific rezoning i;j; / � �,l.y,,, ' if request to R1-13.5 and R1-9.5 ism-'yam .. # also consistent with the Comore- \ 1 hensive Guide Plan for Low Density • / 1 - •. it;=C. Residential land uses on the AREA LOCATION MAP • Gonyea Staff Report 2 February 17, 1984 • ( northern portion of the site. • Directly north and east of the property are one-half acre lots for single family homes. South of the property and Highway #5 are industrial uses. West of the property and County Road #4 is the'Prairie Village Mall shopping center fronting on Highway #5, with access on County Road #4. • The site is currently being used for agricultural purposes. A farm house is located on the corner of County Road #4 and Highway #5. There is a large wetland lying in the southeastern portion of the property, which serves as a storm water retention area for much of the surrounding land. Soil conditions on the property have moderate development limitations, except for the deeper peat areas surrounding the wetland areas. In the southeast corner of the property there are some mature oak trees on the crest of the hill. Comparison of Preliminary Plat to PUD Concept The preliminary plat closely parallels the Planned Unit Development approved in March, 1980. The only variation from the plan is the addition of two residential lots in the northern portion of the property. The original Concept Plan identified 31 single family lots, the preliminary plat identifies 33 single family lots. The original PUD Concept identified an average lot size of 13,600 sq. ft. The minimum lot size in the R1-9.5 area is 11,200 sq. ft., with an average lot size of 11,781. Lot sizes in the R1-13.5 zone average 15,760 sq. ft. with a minimum lot size of 13,600 sq. ft. The overall average lot size for the residential portion of the plat is 13,600 sq. ft. Staff feels that street frontages and lot sizes of the R1-9.5 provide enough area within setbacks to offer a variety of housing styles and sizes comparable to R1-13.5 zoning. An overall development plan identifying unit types and styles may not be necessary for the R1-9.5 zone in this situation. The lower portion of the preliminary plat has been subdivided into outlots for future development, which coincide approximately with the development lines as identified under the original approved Concept Plans. • Ultimate Development The Planned Unit Development Concept approved in March, 1980, identified uses which would be appropriate in character and compatible with surrounding land uses. At that time, specific architectural controls, provisions for common landscaping treatments, compatible signage, and lighting were not identified. Staff suggests that a design framework manual be developed for the outlots in order to provide a basis to coordinate the efforts of various individual owners/developers towards the creation of a totally integrated physical entity. The extent, or scope, of design control should be concerned with five basic elements, or categories, as follows: 1. Site planning 2. Exterior building materials 3. Outdoor lighting 4. Landscaping • 5. Graphics and signage 1"1 Gonyea Staff Report 3 February 17, 1984 Staff envisions that this development framework manual would be comparable to the design framework manual developed for the Preserve Commercial Park North, Area G, along Highway #169, adjacent and west of Eden Prairie Center. In addition, this manual should identify appropriate pedestrian walkway systems throughout the project, as well as consideration assuring a proper buffer and transition between • the single family and office related land uses. Public Waters/Storm Water Run-off Outlot C is proposed for preservation of a public water identified by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Any filling, dredging, or changing of the existing character of the pond is subject to their permit and review process. The DNR granted a permit (#81-6014) to Dennis Gonyea in 1980 for alteration of an unnamed wetland (;27-984W). Several permit extensions were granted by the DNR, the most • recent of which extended the permit to November 30, 1984. All of the terms and • conditions as identified under the initial permit are still in full force and effect. That permit did not authorize an outlet structure for wetland ;27-984W. It is the DNR's understanding that the request for such a structure would come under a separate application from the proponent. In November of 1980, the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District granted approval to the Gonyea development relative to storm water run-off and drainage control plans. Subsequently, Gonyea requested several permit extensions, the most recent of which was considered by the Board on February 1, 1984. It is Staff's understanding that the Board has granted a permit extension to allow the Gonyea Investment Company to begin grading operations, following City approvals on this site, in the Spring, 1984. • The grading and drainage plan has been slightly revised from the 1980 submittal. The reason for this is that the developer does not intend to perform individual fine grading work on the outlots because they are planned for future commercial, office, or multiple residential uses. The roads and pathway bordering the marsh will be constructed, and any remaining grading will consist of filling to meet site earth work balance requirements. Finished grading plans for the outlots will be done at the time of development of those individual parcels and will, again, be submitted for individual watershed permits. Berming Development plans show a two-foot high berm as a buffer between single family and commercial uses, which is proposed to be constructed at the time of grading. Though Staff recognizes that berming and plantings will be addressed in considerably more detail when the commercial outlots develop, the proposed berming should be intensified to provide a more adequate buffer. Traffic Impacts There was considerable discussion at the time of Planned Unit Development Concept approval relative to traffic impacts generated from this development on adjacent streets, including County Road ;4 and Highway #5. At that time, the County was studying what improvements would be necessary and how they would occur. In 1980, the County envisioned improvements, to Lake the form of widening of County Road 114, which included a need for approximately 120 ft. of right-of-way for some distance • Gonyea Staff Report 4 February 17, 1984 back from the intersection. Presently, there are two alternative plans for upgrading of County Road #4 (Eden Prairie Road). Both plans identify a widening of the road, four lanes of through traffic, plus a left-turn lane at County Road #4 and Highway #5. Median separations are also proposed to some distance beyond the Gonyea plat. Plans differ relative to location of median cuts and entrances into the Prairie Village Mall. One alternative provides a median cut at the south entrance to the mall, which coincides directly with Wagner Way. The other plan identifies a median cut at the north mall entrance. The final plat should incorporate County requirements in order to allow for future improvement of the intersection. Street grades at the intersection of Wagner Road and County Road #4 should be revised to reflect a landing pad area of at least 40 feet in length with a maximum grade not to exceed 2%, or County Highway Department requirements, whichever is more restrictive. 'Pedestrian Systems Staff recommendations at the time of PUD approval included provision for incorporation within the project of a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along County Road #4 and a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the southern loop road from County Road #4, northeasterly through the single family area. Recommendations also included provisions of off-road pedestrian ways from Wagner Road and along the wetland area. This has been identified as walkway easement between Outlet B, C, and E on the preliminary plat. ( RECOMMENDATIONS: Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the following recommendation to the City Council: Recommend approval of the request for zoning from Rural to R1-13.5, zoning from Rural to R1-9.5, and Preliminary Plat of 37.19 acres into 33 residential lots and five outlots, subject to the following conditions: A. Prior to final plat approval, proponent shall: 1. Include provisions on the final plat for a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along County Road #4 and along Sheldon Avenue and Wagner Way. 2. Meet all applicable Engineering Department requirements relative to utilities, roads, erosion control, and storm water run-off. 3. Modify the grading plan to intensify berming between the residential areas and the commercial outlots. 4. Revise the grading plan to provide a landing pad area of at least 40 ft. in length with a maximum grade not to exceed 2%, or County Highway Department requirements, whichever is more restrictive. 5. Submit a design framework manual and development plans for • the commercial outlots to the Planning Department and 79 7 Gonyea Staff Report 5 February 17, 1984 • receive the approval of the Planning Staff. 6. Convey land proposed for dedication through the final plat, clear of any mortgages, liens, assessments, taxes, or encumberances. 7. Obtain the necessary permits for access to a County road and for utility work within the County right-of-way from Hennepin County. 8. Obtain the necessary permits from the Department of Natural Resources and the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District for alteration of the wetland area in the southeast area of the property. B. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall; 1. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee. 2. Construct all pedestrian ways as recommended in the Staff report. • 5S-0 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #84-55 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WELSH OFFICES FOR WELSH COMPANIES BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Welsh Office for Welsh Companies, dated February 10, 1984, consisting of 4.72 acres for two office buildings, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein r approved. t ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of , 1984. . 4 `I. Wolfgang N. Penzel, Mayor j. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk J� I Planning Commission Minutes March 12, 1984 E. WELSH OFFICE PLAT. Request for Preliminary Plat of 4.72 acres for two lots. Location: Northeast corner of Prairie Center Drive and W. 78th Street. A public hearing. Mr. Dennis Doyle, Welsh Companies, reviewed the request for platting of two lots along W. 78th Street with the Commission. One office building, the current home of Welsh Companies, had already been built. The second office building was already under construction. The platting of the project would clear up metes and bounds descriptions and dedicate appropriate right-of-way for roads within the area. Planner Franzen reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report for this project with the Commission. Chairman 8ei.rman asked for comments and questions from members of the audience. There were none. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Torjesen, seconded by Schuck, to close the public hearing. Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Torjesen, seconded by Schuck, to recommend to the City Council, approval of the request of Welsh Companies for Preliminary Plat of 4.72 acres into two lots, based on plans dated February 10, 1984, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 2, 1984. / 1 l STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission • FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: March 2, 1984 • PROJECT: Welsh Offices Plat LOCATION: North of W. 78th Street, west of Prairie Center Drive and south of I-494 APPLICANT: rTEE OWNER: Welsh Construction Companies REQUEST: Preliminary Plat of 4.72 acres into two 'nts ` offices Back_c�round • �� Welsh Construction is presently �� %.\� )4 constructing two office buildings i � (Welsh Construction and Texas II-8 / \\ Instruments) on property lying between W. 78th Street, I-494, and C-REGj% PUB,- Prairie Center Drive. At this time, /, 1-9 C-4 due to different ownerships, mort- A // 2 gage companies, and existing utili- PROPOSED SITE e ties, and temporary construction --=_ ;, . A, ,,� easements that need to be vacated, <`� ?...IRE Welsh Construction is requesting a r;= \ preliminary plat of this property ��\ `° •'' into two lots. �1 .R71t .���w .- C3i G Proposed Lot 1, was zoned Office by ` �>t i � �.;a.� ' `^ the City Council during the Summer, ,` P 8 I'��� A = 1983. The Board of Appeals also .i i. approved variances for maximum 'S �'� """" ;,'' " height requirement and driveway /� �Z }-i �, T"- setback from property lines. Pro- '•• a C+F posed Lot 2 was zoned to C-Regional ,t, �n j Service by the Council in February, j_, .,ti , 70.3 1984. The Board of Appeals also N%0-Ili r — • approved variances for building _QF ... 213 height, building setback, parking • C-RE6 setback, and driveway setback. hv:; '�� ' ,3 E 79-' ° y,. AREAL CATION MAP / Anil, sis The proposed subdivision of land into lot sizes of 1.45 acres and 3.27 acres exceeds the minimum lot size requirements for Office and C-Regional Service zoning districts. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff would recommend approval of the preliminary plat request to subdivide 4.72 acres into two lots subject to the following: Prior to final plat approval, proponent shall: 1. Indicate a 10 ft. drainage and utility easement along all lot lines. 2. Meet all applicable Engineer Department and City Code requirements relative to the preparation of a final plat. 3. Provide the City with cross-access agreement for the common driveway reflecting access rights and responsibilities. • • • • C I • MARCH 27,1984 1634 DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATOR -CONDEMNATION DEPOSIT FOR MENARDS/COMB 76942.00 PARCEL-VALLEYVIEW ROAD & I494 �z635 DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATOR -CONDEMNATION DEPOSIT FOR MCCRACKEN PARCEL 1465.00 TOPVIEW ROAD 12636 DANA GIBBS FEBRUARY PACKET DELIVERY 78.00 12637 SHAKOPEE FORD INC BODY REPAIR ON SQUAD CARS 5148.62 12638 G A BRODT CO INC EQUIPMENT PARTS-PARK MAINTENANCE 14.67 12639 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF P/S MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS 9.25 12640 STATE TREASURER TREE SEEDLINGS-FORESTRY DEPT 97.00 12641 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-SPRING BROCHURE 656.54 12642 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 4379.54 12643 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 3057.03 12644 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 343.39 12645 TWIN CITY WINE CO WINE 601.59 12646 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 503.61 12647 INTERCONTINENTAL PCKG WINE 885.87 12648 QUALITY WINE CO WINE 1858.9b 12649 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR 2065.67 12650 B P R CONFERENCE CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT 150.00 12651 DEBRA DEAN REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 21.00 12652 LESLEE BADE REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 16.95 12653 STEVE WHITE SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 350.00 12654 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT 125.00 12655 SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTERPRISES MARCH RENT 3436.98 12656 NORTHCO LTD MARCH RENT 3972.19 i-557 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 3/2/84 18105.21 A. 558 COMMISSIOt,ER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 3/2/84 10456.85 12659 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS PAYROLL 3/2/84 12918.36 12660 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT PAYROLL 3/2/84 65.00 12661 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO PAYROLL 3/2/84 114.00 12662 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 3/2/84 3426.00 12663 UNITED WAY OF MPLS PAYROLL 3/2/84 105.75 12664 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING DUES 589.00 12665 PER .A PAYROLL 3/2/84 15835.40 12666 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY CONFERENCE-PARK PLANNING 60.00 12667 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 90.00 12668 DAKOTA .AVTI CONFERENCE-FIRE DEPT 83.30 12669 NORWEST BANK OF HOPKINS PAYROLL 3/2/84 775.Oo 12670 ROBERT HELLER REFUND-CONCERT 8.00 12671. MRS JERRY MCCARTHY REFUND-CONCERT 8.00 12672 MET CENTER DISNEY ON ICE/FEES PAID 654.00 12673 ELI7. SIKES REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 21.00 12674 KATHY 80RUM REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 30.00 12675 INTERCONTINENTAL PCKG WINE 1527.99 12676 QUALITY WINE CO WINE 1893.41 I2677 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 4374.00 12678 TWIN CITY WINE CD WINE 2172.95 12679 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 372.0? .. 12680 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR 3618.81 12681 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 211.9S . 582 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING WINE 151.60 .4.683 PAUSTIS & SONS CO WINE 611.6:; 12684 STAIL DISTILLERS INC LIQUOR 440.8) 12685 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 8069.9u 12686 DANA GIBBS MARCH PACKET DELIVERY 65.O0 19303393 J v) 12687 RALPH KRATOCHVIL INSTRUCTOR-FITNESS CLASSES/FEES PAID 17.00 12688 YOU AND ME BABY BOOKS-COMMUNITY CENTER/FEES PAID 67.90 J"589 BEER WHOLESALERS INC BEER 4697.85 • ,90 CITY CLUB DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 3331.10 12691 COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIXES 356.85 • 12692 OAY DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 2743.51 12693 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER 4846.16 12694 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 312.90 12695 A J OGLE CO INC BEER 9OB.45 12696 PEPSI COLA/7 UP BOTTLING CO MIXES 583.55 12697 ROYAL CROWN BEVERAGE CO MIXES 120.30 12698 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 6778.30 12699 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK OF ST PAUL 80ND PAYMENT 270.73 12700 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC ROCK 1550.43 12701 NORWEST BANK MPLS NA 80ND PAYMENT 48710.35 12702 NORTHWESTERN NAIL BK OF MPLS BOND PAYMENT 540.00 12703 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE FEBRUARY SALES TAX 10684.97 12704 PINK LADY DELIVERY SERVICE SERVICE-PLANNING DEPT 12.40 12705 GREG ARMBUSTER REFUND-HOME LANDSCAPE CLASSES 15.00 12706 DEBRA BJERKE REFUND-HOME LANDSCAPE CLASSES 15.00 12707 LESLEE CASEY REFUND-HOME LANDSCAPE CLASSES 15.00 12708 JOSEPH DUPONT REFUND-HOME LANDSCAPE CLASSES 15.00 12709 ANN HAGEN REFUND-HOME LANDSCAPE CLASSES 15.00 12710 TAMI MASSEE REFUND-HOME LANDSCAPE CLASSES 30.00 12711 MARMY NELSON REFUND-HOME LANDSCAPE CLASSES 15.00 12712 TOM RADERMACHER REFUND-HOME LANDSCAPE CLASSES 15.00 12713 A & H WELDING & MFG CO STEEL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 17.86 ( 714 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS MARCH SERVICE 733.99 ._715 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 85.85 12716 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 564.19 12717 ACTION RENTAL CENTERS EQUIPMENT RENTAL-STREET OEPT 20.00 12718 ALTA MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS SERVICE-CUMMINS GRILL HOUSE 3143.00 12719 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO DUST MOPS/DUSTERS-LIQUOR STORE 8.85 12720 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PROOUCTS LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 218.45 12721 ANACOMP MICROFILM SLIDES/MICROFILM MACHINE-ENG OPT 1595.D7 12722 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC WARNING SIGNS/STREET SIGNS 659.40 12723 ARA TRANSPORTATION INC BUS SERVICE-SKI TRIP/FEES PAID 646.65 12724 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT CO INC -SEAL/MUFFLER/TAILPIPE/PAINT/OIL PRESSURE 109.02 i GAUGE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 12725 TERRY AUSTIN INSTRUCTOR/EXERCISE CLASSES/FEES PAID 2684.80 12726 AUTO PARTS PRO OF HOPKINS MUFFLER/PIPE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 28.66 12727 SAM BLOOM IRON & METAL CO INC IRON-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 12728 BORCHIERT-INGERSOLL INC BOLTS/WASHERS/NUTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 67.60 12729 BOYER FORD TRUCKS • -WIPER BLADES/PINS FOR FRONT END/WEDGE 208.94 SPRINGS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 12730 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING INC SERVIC-CREEK RIDGE ESTATES/TECHNOLOGY DR 1477.25 • 7.00 12731 ANDREA BROSCH RACQUETBALL INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 12732 BROWN P110T0 -BATTERIES & FILM-POLICE/FIRE/STREET DEPT- 434.40 -FILM-ASSESSING DEPT $256.25/SLIDE PAGES/ -FILM/SLIDES DEVELOPED-PLANNING DEPT • $97.15 12733 BUTCHS BAR SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 186.95 734 CHANIIASSEN BUMPER TO BUMPER -BELTS/MECHANICAL WIRE/CARBURATOR KIT & 2873.47 -FLOAT/BRAKE DRUM/AIR FILTERS/BRAKE SHOES/ -SPARK PLUGS/DISTRIBUTOR CAPS/TIMING • ; 9972411 • • -MODULE $152.72/BRAKE FLUID/SCREWDRIVERS/ -PLIERS/WATER PUMP/OIL FILTERS/GASKET/ ( -ENGINE HEADS $250.00/BATTERY/HOSES/ENGINE $648.00/ANTI-FREEZE/OIL SEAL/ 153.64 12735 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPDRTS CHAIN SAW-FORESTRY DEPT 12736 CLUTCH & U-JOINT BURNSVILLE INC HYDRAULIC HOSES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE $71.36 36 12737 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICE-PR SERVICE-PRAIRIE DRIVE 74.41 12738 COUNTRY CLUB MARKET INC 3546.32 12739 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY QQUICKDIMI-WATERCDEPTES MOO 12741 WARD DAfiLBERG VACUMM BAGS/CLEANING SUPPLIES B3.90 12743 127412 DALCO A DIUPZ FEBRUARY EXPENSES 165.00 DRISKILLS LLS SUPER VALU CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 130.25 12744 STEVEN C DURHAM MILEAGE-PLANNING DEPT 12745 JOY EASTMAN MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 43.20 12746 CLERK OF COURTS-EAU CLAIRE CTY WITHHOLDINGS FROM EMPLOYEE PER COURT ORDER 2B2.00 12747 EDEN PRAIRIE TRASHTRONICS FEBRUARY 84 TRASH PICKUP 37.50 12748 ELASTROMERIC PRODUCTS COMPANY 0 SWITCH/BOLTS-COMMUNITY CENTER 31.37 12749 ELECTIC-AIRE SUPPLYUPP SAFETY SUPPLIES/GOGGLES-WATER DEPT 74.72 12750 ELVINAE SAFETY INC MINUTES FOR PARK & REC COMMISSION MTG 58.50 12751 O ESS ENO HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 75.00 12752BRUC RON REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 18.D0 12753 EXIDE EWALD 7 BATTERIES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 337.65 12754 FRMS BATTERY STEELCO SALES STEEL-PARK MAINTENANCE 105.73 12755FARMERSSULFATE-WATER DEPT 6600.06 12756 JANDFLINE CONTROLS INC SUPPLIES-SENIOR CENTER 16.90 ( ?757 ERN FLYNNFORMICO REFUND-SKATING CLASSES 11.15 759 JOIN FRANE MARCH EXPENSES 165.00 1276 JOHN HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 44.00 12760 DAVIDI FRAZIER COMPUTER-CITY HALL 2000.00 12762 CITY OF RVICESY FEBRUARY CHARGES 72.50 • 12762 G & K SERVICES O.Oe 12763 VOID OUT CHECK EQUIPMENT PARTS-PARK MAINTENANCE 149.9S 12764 R L GOULD & CO REPAIR GAS PUMPS-STREET DEPT 173.55 12765 HALE CO INC INSTRUCTOR/EXERCISE CLASSES/FEES PAID 715.20 12766 POPL HENRYKARIN HARRIS HOCKEY DFFTCIAL/FEES PAID 20.03 ` 12767GREASE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 56.86 12768 HOPKINS DODGE SALES INC REFUND-FITNESS CLASSES IB.0,0 12769 PHILIP HOVANDER REPAIR CYLINDER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 213.75 12770 HYDRAULIC SPECIALTY CO 1181.6:: 12771 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #272 FEBRUARY 84 CUSTODIAL SERVICE 1181.E 12772 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIT #272 DEC E83ITONFEBI84-COMMUNITY EDUCATION 25A 0c' 0' 12773 INFORMATION PUBLISHERS INC 94.0: 12774 IBM CORP MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 63.03 . 12775 J & R RADIATOR CORP REPAIR RADIATDR-STREET DEPT 130.00 12776 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 132.91; 12777 PETER W JACKSDN HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 1195.00 1277E JUSTUS LUMBER CO PAINT/STORAGE SHELVES-WATER DEPT/LUMBER 93.6 . 12779 KAR PRODUCTS INC BOLTS & NUTS-PARK MAINTENANCE 12780 KARULF HARDWARE INC -GLOVES/ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES/SAW BLADES/ 883.6`. -LIGHT BULBS/PAINT BRUSHES/WIRE BRUSHES/ -FAUCET/VALVE/DRILL BIT/BATTERIES/NAILS/ -BOLTS/TAPE/PLUMBING SUPPLIES/HAMMERS/ -PLUGS/HINGE/SCRAPER/COTTER PINS/PAINT/ 24671.42 • 1 -BROOM/MOP/OIL/WRENCH/STAPLES/COPPER TUBING/COPPER ELBOW/COPPER PIPES 7781 KOHLER MIX SPECIALTIES CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 108.83 32 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER BRACKETS/MAILBOX/CHISEL/VALVE/NAILS 278.15 c/83 80B LAMBERT MARCH EXPENSES 169.50 12784 LANCE SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 13.12 12785 LEEF BROS INC FEBRUARY 84 RUG SERVICE 465.59 12786 LOGIS FEBRUARY 84 SERVICE 2914.95 12787 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR HEATER CORE/LAWN MOWER BLADE-PARK MAINT 303.60 12788 TERRY LOVAASEN SCUBA INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 1072.50 12789 LOWELLS AUTOMOTIVE SPECIALISTS PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE 20.20 12790 LYMAN LUMBER CO LUMBER-STREET DEPT 14.15 12791 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC 7 GUTTER BROOMS-STREET DEPT 500.50 12792 LEONARD J MAGERER CO SKATE SHARPENER REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER 27.90 12793 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM APRIL 64 SEWER SERVICE 58910.77 12794 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION WINTER MIX-STREET DEPT 601.75 12795 MIDWEST LANDSCAPING SPADE BLADE-FORESTRY DEPT 288.00 12796 MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE CO EMPLOYMENT ADS-ASSESSING DEPT 197.67 12797 MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE CO ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER 79.80 12798 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 25.60 12799 MINNESOTA CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES SAND BAGS-STREET DEPT 112.00 12800 MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY SERVICE 1461.89 12801 MRPA 1984 DUES-COMMUNITY CENTER 80.00 128D2 MRPA SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY SERVICES 8.D0 12803 MINNESOTA TORO INC OIL SEAL/BOLTS & NUTS-PARK MAINTENANCE 171.57 12804 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP SERVICE 35.25 12805 MODERN TIRE CO 4 TIRES FOR TRAILER/EXHAUST PIPES 110.76 '806 STEPHEN JUEL MONSON REFUND-BUILDING DEPT 250.00 307 MUNICIPALS DUES 5.00 12608 DENNIS NESBITT EXPENSES-BUILDING DEPT 14.00 12809 NORTHERN STATES POWER SERVICE 2.86 12810 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 7766.20 12811 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 4213.5 , 12812 NORTHWESTERN POWER EQUIPMENT CO I PIPE & CONCRETE PATCH-WATER DEPT 1066.93 12813 STEVE OLSTAD MILEAGE 6.33 12814 PACKAGING SALES CHARLTON-GARRETT BAGS-LIQUOR STORES 366.3.1 12815 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING CO CONCESSIONS STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CTR 192.OG 12816 CONNIE L PETERS MILEAGE 18.25 12817 SCOTT PETERS BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 32.00 12618 PRAIRIE. ELECTRIC COMPANY INC REPAIR PARKING LOT LIGHTS-COMMUNITY CENTER 54.75 12619 PRESERVE REXALL DRUGS SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 2.50 12620 PRIOR LAKE AGGREGATES INC SAND 294.54 12B21 R & R SPECIALTIES INC SHARPEN ZAMBONI BLADES-COMMUNITY CENTER 133.00 12822 RADIO SHACK TAPE CARTRIDGES-COMMUNITY CENTER 25.90 12623 RAPID SERV INC FREIGHT CHARGES-WATER OEPT 13.50 12824 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC -SERVICE-WESTWOOD IND PK/HOMEWARD HILLS 8063.83 -ROAD/ARBON GLEN/CARDINAL CREEK 3RD ADDN/ -RYMARLAND CAMP 3RD ADDN/LAVONNE IND PK/ RAINBOW DRIVE/PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 12625 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CD REPAIR CYLINDER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 15D.40 , 12826 JOIN RYSKI BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 204.00 12627 SAILOR NEWSPAPERS ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER 175.20 �e/' '628 SAUNOERS-THALDEN & ASSOC INC SERVICE-PURGATORY CREEK RECREATION AREA 6220.20 9812713 12829 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO SOCKET SET/TABLE SAW/DRILL PRESS 1024.00 12830 SUSAN M SELSETH VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 72.Oo 12831 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP TORQUE WRENCH-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 103.55 132 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING INC EMPLOYMENT AD-ASSESSING DEPT 54.00 k ..33 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING INC LEGAL ADS/ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER 998.25 12834 STEVE SULLIVAN MILEAGE-PLANNING DEPT 15.75 12835 W GORDON SMITH CO -DIESEL FUEL 56667.20/MUFFLER/CHOKE/ 7041.58 -CARBURATOR KIT/DEGREASER/POWER STEERING FLUID/PLUGS/GREASE/HOSES 12836 LOWELL THONE EXPENSES-BUILDING DEPT 14.00 12837 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY TURF BUILDER-PARK MAINTENANCE 5642.2E : 12838 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 25.11 12839 UNITED LABORATORIES INC CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT 221.38 12840 VESSCO INC CIRCUIT BOARD/CLUTCH/OIL SEAL-WATER DEPT 683.49 12841 VIKING LABORATORIES INCORPORATED BICARBONATE OF SODA-COMMUNITY CENTER 79.00 12842 WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY 252 5/8 IN METER & COPPERHORN/ 15570.20 12B43 THE WINE SPECTATOR BOOK-LIQUOR STORE 33.25 12844 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 1620.37 12845 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 1ST AID SUPPLIES-PARK MAINTENANCE 11.45 12846 ZIEGLER INC BOLTS & NUTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 77.50 12847 CARLOYN CASSOLA GUITAR INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 444.00 12848 CITY OF BURNSVILLE MUNICIPALS DINNER-CITY HALL 324.00 12849 GLORIA GOLDBERG REFUND-SKATING CLASSES 41.00 1285D NORTHERN MESSENGER EXPENSES-PLANNING DEPT 18.55 12851 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE FEBRUARY FUEL TAX 946.39 12852 NORTH CENTRAL SECTION AWWA CONFERENCE-WATER DEPT 225.00 12853 RAE ANN BRENCKMAN REFUND DEPOSIT OF PAVILION AT ROUND LAKE 2O.00 12854 WENDY BURNS CARLSON SKATING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 111.50 55 PETTY CASH EXPENSES 67.64 ,..(,56 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO WINE 641.94 12857 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 283.68 12858 INTERCONTINENTAL PCKG WINE 573.65 12859 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 423.89 12860 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 5097.32 12861 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 2728.54 12862 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR 1657.66 12863 NATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 805.00 12864 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF P/S MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION 10.7E 12865 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 3/16/84 16830.74 12866 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 3/16/84 9601.13 12867 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS PAYROLL 3/16/84 12571.53 12868 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT PAYROLL 3/16/84 65.00 12869 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE PAYROLL 3/16/84 114.00 12870 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE PAYROLL 3/16/84 3511.00 12871 UNITED WAY OF MPLS PAYROLL 3/16/84 105.75 12872 PER A PAYROLL 3/16/84 15576.6') 12873 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK PAYROLL 3/16/84 37.50 12874 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE CO INSURANCE 704.7'C 12875 MEDCENTECS HEALTH PLAN INSURANCE 11478.45 12876 GROUP (HEALTH PLAN INSURANCE 1991.2C 12877 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN INSURANCE 11518.6: 12878 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF P/S MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION 1O.75 )'9879 STATE or MINNESOTA BOOKS-POLICE DEPT 70.50 SO RALPH KRATOCHVIL FITNESS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 8.00 13190354 • • 12881 CLERK OF COURTS-EAU CLAIRE CTY WITHHOLDINGS FROM EMPLOYEE PER COURT ORDER 1.00 12882 A M GRAPHICS INC DECALS-FIRE DEPT 133.00 93 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 13.80 %...84 ADVANCEO DUPLICATING & PRINTING BOOKS-POLICE DEPT 10.00 12885 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDI0 REPAIR CAMERA-POLICE DEPT 41.30 12886 MARTY BENSON REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 16.25 12887 BLOOMINGTON LOCKSMITH CO DUPLICATE KEYS-PDLICE DEPT 58.65 12888 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING INC SERVICE-ANDERSON LAKE PARKWAY 1854.65 12689 PETER BRITNEY REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 14.00 12890 BUSINESS FURNITURE INC CHAIR PART-ENGINEERING DEPT 74.00 12891 DORHOLT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 729.00 12892 TOM EASTMAN EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER 0.53 12893 CITY OF EDINA FEBRUARY 84 TESTS WATER OEPT 94.00 12894 ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS DRAFTING SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 23.45 12895 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN FIRE TRAINING MANUAL-FIRE DEPT 2D.00 12896 GENERAL BINDING CORP MOTOR/SWITCH-FIRE DEPT 214.16 12897 GENERAL C0MMUNICATIONS INC RADIO REPAIR & PARTS 108.12 12898 HENNEPIN CTY CHIEFS OF POICE SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 195.00 12899 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER SWIMMING POOLS LICENSE FEE-COMMUNITY CTR 225.00 12900 IBM CORPORATION MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT 16D.00 129D1 IAA I DUES-FIRE DEPT 25.00 12902 ICMA BOOK-MANAGER 28.50 12903 JAK OFFICE PRODUCTS CO OFFICE SUPPLIES-PDLICE DEPT 7.11 129D4 CARL JULLIE EXPENSES 40.13 129D5 DAVID KREEMER VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 48.00 12906 KUSTOM QUALITY ELECTRONICS REPAIR RADAR-POLICE DEPT 114.15 9907 M E LANE INC INSURANCE 36.00 It 08 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD JANUARY 84 SERVICE 12554.55 1u909 JOANN LUCE REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 12.00 12910 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO OXYGEN-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 41.47 12911 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMIS EASEMENT-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 300.00 12912 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM FEBRUARY 84 SAC CHARGES 30714.75 12913 MIDLAND EQUIPMENT CO HYDRAULIC OIL TANK-EQUIPMENT 165.00 12914 MINNEGASCD SERVICE 5853.2i; 12915 MINNESOTA PREVENTION RESOURCE CEN FILM-SENIOR CENTER 3.OG 12916 NORTHERN STATES POWER CD SERVICE 8748.87 12917 PNEUMATIC CONTROLS INC AIR FILTER/GREASE-COMMUNITY CENTER 13.36 12918 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC -6 100 WATT LAMPS/12 EXIT LAMPS/5 LIGHT 801.09 BULBS-COMMUNITY CENTER 12919 RADIO SHACK TELEPHONE WIRE & WALL PLATE-ENGINEERING 10.44 12920 ALICE RICHTER REFUND-POST NATAL CLASSES 25.00 12921 REID SARENPA REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 3.50 12922 MATIHEW SCHRAEDER REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 6.50 12923 SAY ELECTRIC INCORPORATED REPAIR LOCK-P/S BLDG 48.00 12924 SHAKOPEE FORD INC -CHECK TRANSMISSION/REPAIR CARBURATOR/ 1619.76 ELECTRONIC IGNITION/BODY REPAIR-SQUAD CARS 12925 ST CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 298.00 12926 STEVEN R SINELL MARCH EXPENSES 171.0o 12927 SNYDERS DRUG STORES INC SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 28.64 12928 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING INC ADS-LIQUOR STORE 128.70 12929 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING INC EMPLOYMENT AD-COMMUNITY CENTER 18.O'1 ^930 THOMAS PONTIAC BUICK GMC 2 3/4 TON TRUCKS-STREET DEPT & WATER DEPT 22366.26 931 THOMPSON & KLAVERKAMP LEGAL SERVICE-SANITARY LANDFILL 187.50 12932 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO ACETYLENE GAS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 24.1E 8841966 y,i'� • 12933 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE INC GAS CYLINDERS-COtVIUNITY CENTER 97.77 .77 CQ34 RYAN WELLS REFUND-SKATING CLASSES 15 WEST WELD WELDING ALLOY-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 288.01 936 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 1ST AID SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER • 21.25 12937 NORTHOALE CONSTRUCTION CO SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 26629.5s 12938 SHAFER 12939 HOCKEY ASSOCIATION OFNTRACTINGCEDEN PRAIRI HOCKEYETOURNMENTCENTER CONCESSIONE6261 STAND PROCEEDS 181257.070 12494 VOID OUT CHECK 90.00- 214475.38 • 5850355.17 • • • j1 I /r 56,' • • • Pwrch 27, 1984 Cash Disbursements by Fund number 10 GENERAL 243334.15 11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT 12103.10 15 L/S PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL 53688.58 17 L/S PRESERVE 36088.93 33 UTILITY BOND FUND 384.44 43 77 FIRE DEBT FUND 19456.20 44 UTILITY DEBT FUND 29524.88 51 IMPROV CONST FUND 6703.92 73 WATER FUND 51608.00 77 SEWER FUND 90267.16 81 TRUST d ESCROW FUND 103.60 87 COMMUNITY DEVELOP BLOCK G 9839.16 90 TAX INCREMENT CONST FUND 296713.05 91 TAX INCREMENT DEBT FUND 540.00 1650355.17 • _ 1 56 2 • ' • • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION #84-54 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT DOUGLAS INDUSTRIAL PARK FOR DOUGLAS SKANSE • BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: • That the preliminary plat of Douglas Industrial Park for Douglas Skanse, dated February 17, 1984, consisting of 5.9 acres for two (2) lots for industrial buildings, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of , 1984. Wolfgang H. Perizel, Mayor • ATTEST: John 0. Frane, City Clerk C 5/2 • Planning Commission Minutes March 12. 1984 • 4 D. DOUGLAS INDUSTRIAL PARK, by Douglas Skanse. Request for 1 imiay P arlat of 5.9 acres for two lots for industrial • use. Location: Northwest quadrant of Washington Avenue and • Valley View Road. A public hearing. 1 Staff explained that this project proposed only the platting of two existing metes and bounds lots within the industrial area in the northeast quadrant of the City. Proponent had approached the City regarding an addition to one of the buildings. Due to the need for • additional right-of-way for Valley View Road and the need for • adjustment of the property line between the two lots to accomplish the addition, the City required a platting of the two lots by the property owner. Buildings exist currently on each of the two sites. • In addition, due to the required right-of-way for Valley View Road, • front yard variances would be necessary for both sites. The project would also, therefore, need to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals. Planner Franzen reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report for this project. • • Chairman Bearman asked for comments and questions from members of the audience. There were none. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Torjesen, to close the 3' public hearing. Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Hallett, to recommend to the City Council, approval of the Preliminary Plat for the Douglas Industrial Park by Douglas Skanse, for two lots on 5.9 acres, based on plans dated February 17, 1984, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report of March 2, 1984. • Motion carried--5-0-0 • • • • STAFF REPORT ' TO: Planning Comnission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner TIROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning . DATE: March 2, 1984 PROJECT: Douglas Industrial Park ' LOCATION: Northwest corner of Valley View Road and Washington Avenue • APPLICANT & FEE OWNER: Douglas Skanse • REQUEST: Preliminary Plat approval to subdivide ').9 acres into two industrial • lots Background _ - i-., t • �C I�' i i The Comprehensive Guide Plan identi ,a! or ��� .r« t\.,-IL fies an industrial land use for the .S 3 ,,,; ,use ,,_.,. ,,,;. 50 \';_\ property. The property is currently I-' �- 2 , zoned I-5 Park. There are two R•�cK IT?3 -R INI ARK —)c-"kWV •, existing industrial office/warehouse w 17.1. p.i;;; buildings on the property. ,rd -��• ' Yj` The owner of both lots, Mr. Skanse, A 1-5 RIC 1_7 'v • desires to construct a loading dock --- _ facility adjacent to the west wall : goPROPOOED SITE .........)-5 PRK" r of the building on Lot 2. This m 3il proposed construction would cross i3 RM-25' r5S��_ ,r 1 % I 12 /I over the existing comnon lot line I-Z FR. -2 R between the two parcels. ► 1 'M i ,,,o -_._i .-_-- In 1977, prior to an administrative 1 74' division of the property, a lot _ i �, variance for these lots (2.53 acres ?-1 �` ' • '`� , \I �' �. i and 3.37 acres) was granted by the .n PK b'4-". „j� t Board of Appeals. Also, in 1977, construction of the buildings began ;u ' t, before a final agreement could be .O i-2 K : �r : established between the City and the MP ` Nproperty owner relative to acquisi- tion of land for Valley View Road 1-2 ,h realignment.. As a result, the i� o7a LI: building on proposed Lot 1 is m N i located 30 ft. from the right-of-way ti: r— :h... I (75 ft. is required) and parking on -- — •- both lots is too close to the front AREA LOCATION M A P property line. _ • The proponent will be seeking a number of variances from the Board of Appeals • ir relative to floor area ratios, buildinlj setbacks, and parking setbacks. The proponent owns both buildings and both parcels. Currently, cross-access • agreements exist for the use of the driveway along the comnon interior property line. These agreements should be revised to reflect the new common lot line, access rights, and responsibilities. Valley View Road The land area within the road easement along the south property line (Document #4759947) should be dedicated and included as road right-of-way on the final plat. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff would recommend approval of the preliminary plat to subdivide 5.9 acres of industrially zoned property into two lots, provided: Prior to final plat approval, proponent shall: 1. Dedicate land area within the highway easement as road right-of-way. 2. Provide the City with a revised cross-access agreement reflecting the new common lot line, access rights, and responsibilities. • ri • • • • �lpl0 March 27, 1984 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 84-64 . A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF DOUGLAS INDUSTRIAL PARK • WHEREAS, the plat of Douglas Industrial Park has been submitted in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: . A. Plat approval request for Douglas Industrial Park is approved upon compliance with the recommendation ' of the City Engineer's Report on this plat dated March 20, 1984. 8. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Registrar of Titles for their use as required r by MSM 462.358, Subd. 3. t C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on March 27, 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, Clerk Tell CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician gp5 e2 DATE: March 20, 1984 SUBJECT: DOUGLAS INDUSTRIAL PARK ' PROPOSAL: The property owner, Douglas Skanse, has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Oouglas Industrial Park. This plat contains approximately 5.9 acres located north of Valley View Road, west of Washington Avenue, in the North = of Section 12. The owner has requested a lot line adjustment to allow construction of an addition to the existing building on Lot 2, Block 1. An . existing building also occupies Lot 1, 8lock 1. Included in the • final plat is the dedication of additional right-of-way for the recently constructed Valley View Road. HISTORY: Zoning of the property to I-5 Park was approved by the Council through Ordinance 135. A 1977 Administrative Division authorized division of the original parcel. Variances from required floor area ratios, building setbacks and parking setbacks were approved by the 8oard of Appeals on March 8, 1984. Resolution 84-54, approving the preliminary plat, is scheduled for City Council acceptance on March 27, 1984. VARIANCES: Variance requests have been authorized by the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal utilities and streets necessary to serve this plat have been installed. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the City Code. BONDING: Bonding will not be necessary. Pg. 2, Final Mat Douglas Industrial Park 3/20/84 RECOMMENDATION: • Recommend approval of the final plat of Douglas Industrial Park subject to the requirements of this report and the following: 1. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of 5120.00. 2. City Council approval of Resolution 84-54. • 3. Receipt of copies of a revised cross-access agreement. DLO:sg cc: Mr. Erland Ekberg Mr. Douglas Skanse • .• • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRI.E HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #84-56 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PRESERVE COMMERCIAL PARK NORTH 3RD ADDITION FOR THE PRESERVE OF EDEN PRAIRIE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Preserve Commercial Park 3rd Addition for the Preserve of Eden Prairie, dated November, 1983, consisting of 2.8 acres for five lots for a care care center, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. k ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of , 1984. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor • ATTEST: Sohn 0. Frane, City Clerk 570 STAFF REPORT • TO: Planning Commission • FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: March 16, 1984 • PROJECT: Eden Prairie Car Care Center LOCATION: West of Highway #169, between Regional Center Road and Middleset Road APPLICANT: Ed Flaherty FEE OWNER: The Preserve of Eden Prairie REQUEST: Preliminary Plat of 2.8 acres into five (5) commercial lots Background Tc_ -- - -- The Comprehensive Guide Plan identi- �, fies a Regional-Commercial land use '� RE � k for this site. Surrounding land ! I uses are primarily regional conmer- PROPOSED SITE ' � cial with Eden Prairie Center to the ,, •71 :. north and east of the site, I 1-5 F'` ' _,'0j - (I,gjain ! : Castleridge housing to the south and L "I southwest of the site, and future i II regional commercial uses to the ,,. 8I-2:r;1 ;VIM north of the site. .f•,_., \:. C REG S ;' ,, 9 �i is The site is commonly referred to as !' >+ 1,r 80-3• '7'_" commercial "Area G," part of an x OFC � 0-11' ' 7,� ,overall Preserve Planned Unit ads Development Concept Plan for the `.ux ,t.7.�._QF.-' 213 Preserve Commercial Park North. In t C REG April of 1977, the site was zoned to i r poll Regional Commercial, subject to a f C- 7.. ,; design framework manual that estab- lished controls for architecture, 78-56 exterior materials, landscaping, R M-8 5 4 C-REG access, parking, lighting, signage, ,,Z and walkways. The design framework p r, manual also established a Design .. Review Committee which now consists 30? ti- REG- of a proponent, a Council member, ° SER and a City Staff member, to review FC ,. development proposals for compliance ,AREA LOCATION MAPJ Eden Prairie Car Care Center 2 March 23, 1984 with the design framework manual standards. The original Concept Plan approved as part of the rezoning is illustrated by Figure A, and identifies up to six buildings to be developed adjacent to Highway #169 ' between Middleset Road and Regional Center Road. A final plat was approved dividing the site into two separate lots, Lots 2 and 3, Block 3, Preserve Commercial Park North. The current proposal by the proponent involves a replatting of Lots 2 and 3, Block 3, to accommodate a car care center concept, including a Typhoon Car Wash, Big Wheel Auto Store, Midas Muffler Shop, Rapid Oil Change, and a superette, with gas pumps. The car care center concept plan was approved by the Design Review Committee on February 1, 1984, subject to twelve conditions as outlined in the attached letter from Chris Enger to Mr. Flaherty, developer. On February 1, 1984, the project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee, subject to twelve conditions as outlined in the letter from Chris Enger to Mr. Flaherty, developer. Variances Since the original Planned Unit Development did not identify the following variances, the proponent will need to apply to the Board of Appeals for: 1. Setback variances from interior lot lines on Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5 for parking and structures. 2. Increased floor area ratios of D.31 for Lot 2, and 0.25 for Lot 3. 3. A reduction in parking stalls required from 176 to 77. 4. Increased sign square footage from BO sq. ft. overall to 120 sq. ft. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the request for preliminary plat of 2.8 acres for the car care center subject to the following: 1. Approval of variances by the Board of Appeals. 2. Compliance with the requirements of the Design Review Committee meeting of February 1, 1984. 3. Receive approval of grading, drainage, and erosion control plans from the Watershed District. 4. Provide slope stabilization plans for review by the City. 5. Provide necessary engineering plans relative to roads, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water. ( 6. Notify the Watershed District and the City at least 48 hours prior to grading on the site. 7. Notify the State Highway Department for any work to be done within road right-of-ways and obtain any required permits. i ) Eden Prairie Car Care Center 3 March 23, 1984 • 8. Provide plans for review by the Fire Marshall. • 1 • • • r� - 1 > A 111•1 1 ; I i r • if. • 1k fe 4 ,.. i • p t.502-2"21 I 504 7.- i /N 4/ ilt6. 'IN /1 1 i 0 EowN4 .:... ti /Wi. 41's'V i' 1 1 I I iiI E I fr! it / ,..,..: 40.: .‘..,'''‘... 2 :.:•:''Y 1 - i ,,• ,,,O,.11,,,,,,' , • .,N,y, ,. 1.—..._.. 'J..__,,../....'4::1/ •• ''''' l• i 11 Si 16 •,,x .1 , 3 .. ,.• ..." ,.• ...rte. .1,4 e/e, r- 1 .. /VI's" / , ,,Vot ft,,,, ......74., s.:0i,'.9.. ,. / AN,,,,,.. . ...1 .............:,... ' • / / • " , 4 • 1"! :..:1 •• r ss 4 '-.. /VO, N ; 4) k,'°,,,....,' , it. If. : '-44.: I • ,'`,:.±4,•,... _ , -2 .. itt . * , IQ!! . 1 ltil 1, ..°.? ,,. ' ‘41:',V..4 41, 4 s. ;4. o •‘.,,,64/a. a I: 11. s,•,.ii,.. .!it,0 • I*41111Lamieur.....,,711,111.si ..., '4 .-• •4°. .9'',41As •.• 4, / . .. ' / .035'• 1 j . . . . .•. . . :::- ... . .. .. ... '1::..i6:11:: ::...:.:-..—......'"., -........... . \ 1 .....:.:.... . - , •••• f..--.::.:,' vi...: ..•-• li • : ''' ' ,' * , ....-44 k.:&•,. .•:„.1 • ,.:•... r. . .1 — .... ... / .. .. .-: ,,..••• '-.,„‹ ilh. .,..... g......•:i . . . ' c. / / k a ... ..... .. ,.. .... . . . • -. •ii , . • ..:.: ...:'.....:..!!........'.. 1:.... .3 • I • I 1' ..... . • ..• • -•- %• ,°''' i i i J , .-- - m 0 0 ..1 0 i ..... • 2 ....--' ... 4-------- ,1 t, , I i i 13 \\ ' stwov,,LO iW i S • 00410 •' \ '� y w°.1�1 /I tits_ . / . II Y1w1.791h.Street.-Ateaelltnl 6to-.Nwtt _ _ ,',,' ATS ROSEMOUNT INC. MINNESOTA PROTECTIVE 'S • LIFE BLDG. ' I.494 • • i;' .,• 1 kin Sheet • PRESERVE COMMERCIAL PARK NORTH . ' OW" Intornataml Ka Ws . . \L -."--":-5 ' /� t8 r°" "°"'` Eden Prairie IWIVI 6( -� %,:- �$. Center ti Cot*jileve 4<, Mtlawn Lakes set vsnlege CMetMYt, g- ,4', PRESERVE COMMERCIAL PARK t i 4�n CarnlaNtwete -a.. a.. \ 0e,�/� NORTH 2ND ADDITION �^P�oNy `pr ie E�Tce�sin s R• �� — . HiFe., R�. PRESERVE iy„{ to*/���i ''' COMMERCIAL •`::::"Notthtnderk�<, �� Ttnedwmee T1� ��Qrttt � i • PARK SOUTH ��]1t it.I gd10 I \. A _• t' �. 1 as twind D I aOst- wtiWuee lCtac.» iervo i,_s ,, ce....ny ► J 1Aeettnunie lax AJ, ;' ynd wn lNt"e_—POka„ T nAaree — y_ 14"a n. o.«l-,�`)nS`,� �,. t �� �d�Yd e• Oaks � \\ I ' .+r • t1 Ne4 Leto T sill of Lake. ,,,v, I( , ) stfp0"i'"pe° SURROUNDING _i f) LAND USES .400ep ,. 40,14 1FFILES I 8950 WEN PRAIRIE ROAD/EON PRAIRIE.MN 553442499/TELEPHONE 16121937.2282 February 8, 1984 Mr. Ed Flaherty Rapid Oil Change 340 E. Lake Street Minneapolis, MN 55408 Dear Mr. Flaherty: I am writing to summarize the conditions of approval identified at the Design Review Committee meeting of February 1, 1984. The set of plans reviewed with the Committee on that date consisted of drawings done in November, 1983, that had been since amended and not dated; therefore, for purposes of this approval, we have dated them February 1, 1984. 1 1a vestern access into Pf .le;e' Road wi'` have to directly lign with the public road improvement access with the street to the south. Final . ( confirmation of this location is pending. 2. The eastern exit on Middleset Road from the Typhoon Car Wash has been reconfiplantingured g has and beenreduced added for width screening2of ft. thetsouth ft. end of theming and Typhoon building. 3. We understand from your presentation that there will be a 16 ft. wide garage door at the south end of the Typhoon building, which will be electronically operated and will not be open unless a car is leaving the car wash. 4. Although the Committee has reviewed the plans for the superette at the north end of the site, we understand that, at this time, there is no user identified and the balance of the site will probably be constructed initially without this use. This will require that the access roads coming through the superette site be installed with the initial construction of the balance of the site. 5. I have included a specification for exterior lighting, which will be required in locations shown on your site plan. The maximum height of free- standing lighting shall be 21 ft. and the luminar as indicated on your plans shall be high pressure sodium. 6. The exterior architecture and material of the building shall be as depicted Mr. Flaherty -2- February 6, 1984 in the approved plans. Samples of metal facia are approved as dark brown with the exterior wall material of medium to dark brown brick. All exterior • garage and pedestrian doors shall be identical in color throughout the site and shall be of a color to match the brick of the building. 7. Mechanical equipment shall be grouped wherever possible and screened with a metal material identical to the metal facia. 8. Free-standing signs along U. S. #169 shall be as follows: A. The Typhoon pylon must be relocated to the Middleset Road frontage on the west side of the eastern access road and shall not exceed 20 ft. in height, nor 80 sq. ft. in area. B. A free-standing sign may be located along the U. S. #169 frontage adjacent to the Big Wheel/Midas building, not to exceed 20 ft. in height, nor 120 sq. ft. in area. This joint free-standing sign is for identification for Big Wheel, Midas, and Rapid Oil Change and is subject to final review of the City Staff. �. One free-standinr ;icm for the superette site s' 11 be allowed immediately adjacent to the northeast corner of the superette building, not to exceed 16 ft. in height, nor 80 sq. ft. in area. D. All pylon signs on the site must have a similarly designed board and material. 9. . Wall signs along the U. S. #169 frontage shall be limited to 15% of that wall area and shall be back-lit and on sign "cans" of identical material and design, and shall be of a common lettering style. The metal facia shall be treated as the sign band and shall be the location of all wall-mounted signs. The balance of the wall signs on the project shall be as depicted in the submitted drawings, but shall not exceed 15% of any wall elevation. 10. A landscaping plan will be reviewed in detail prior to building permit issuance, which will effectively screen all parking and loading areas. This will require additional evergreen plantings along the road frontages. 11. Since you will be proceeding with a subdivision request and since the original Planned Unit Development (PUO) approval did not grant variances for zero-lot-line setbacks, nor for the 120 sq. ft. joint sign (Code maximum is 80 sq. ft.), you will need to apply for these setback variances from the Board of Appeals. Consistent with the original PUD and the Design Committee's review, the Planning Staff will be recommending approval of these variances. 12. Mr. Redpath and I presented your plans to the City Council at its February 7, 1984, meeting, along with the Committee's conditions of approval. Please be aware that any modification of the approved plans Or conditions of approval will require review by the Design Review Committee. 111 Mr. Flaherty -3- February 6, 1984 Please submit three (3) full sets of plans, modified according to these conditions, to the City. • - Sincerely, • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • Chris Enger U Director of Planning CE/kk Enclosure �. cc: Paul Redpath Larry Peterson Peter Jarvis, BRW • • • • • ff E_ . J7 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY 320 Washington Av. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 HENNEPIN 9353381 _FT_ liY-935-6433 February 15, 1984 Carl Jullie, City Manager City of Eden Prairie • 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Carl: Hennepin County is looking for a leaf composting site in the south area of the county, and the area of Flying Cloud Airport, southeast of County Roads 1 and 4, has many advantages. Attached is a preliminary site plan we have prepared. As you know, our previous leaf composting site was on city-awned land being held by Eden Prairie for park development, and located south of County Road 1 near Franlo Road. Last summer Eden Prairie notified us that our lease would terminate in June, 1984. Our time schedule, therefore, is to have a new site available this September for 1984 leaf disposal and composting. The leaf composting operation at Flying Cloud would be the same as at our previous site. In the fall leaves would be brought to the site by individuals and city crews. Hennepin County staff would water, turn, and shred the leaves. During three to five weekends each spring county staff will be at the site on • weekends, when most people cone to pick up compost. During the fall, October is the busiest, when traffic averages about 15 vehicles per week day; 35 vehicles per Saturday; and 25 vehicles per Sunday. In the spring, the busiest time is April and May, when the site is open for public compost pickup. Traffic averages approximately 20 to 30 vehicles per week day; 75 to 100 vehicles per Saturday; and 50 to 75 vehicles per Sunday. A PCA compost site permit is required, and the county will obtain the permit and will make every effort to maintain the site in a neat and orderly manner. The county will be looking for an eight-to-ten-year lease from the Metropolitan Airports Commission, and will be contacting MAC staff soon so they are aware of our plans. Your comments on this project are requested. Would you also let us know what official action the City of Eden Prairie must take on this project, and what additional information you may need. Sincerely, Luther D. Nelson, P.E. Director HENNEPIN COUNTY `y LI)N/mvr . ply an equal opportunity employer r. 'I . ,- t -i, an [ > i� :h:' ) moo' \)_-% \ Lr�uroolo M[ !! '' `\ }1__ i i' . ` f ,,, k .,r 0 i, I +,en.•r (y��� — ---,,i%7 ' ',` l y G o~ /...•r t' I••.,e .e c,.. a-� 1 �- ---111 — -•- fer \_`' -, 4 . r-/,Is . .`�� In'aler Tar. ^ •i ■ 're0ie•• q. r r6nm•x.` r j *?6 , ` IF4 �'1U; N 16PRAIRIE ' '-r` _ 1 • F �.r :\ • . _,t,• , S•-� t Z eae� r 15 • �; f , if.:-N.�i •r. e66._ — ----�--} Pe0 'A 1 r� J ,e ).. • )\i';‘;',,71 lo G ' o ` * ( �McCoy!Ake , '—;" f _r I -' \ J B B 0 EdenPrairieCem'� f ,` @ / _ ' 'If.,". - y � Ter ^ • i 9 . 10 h01 'ii eI , ti `, J � - nP` ,- i21 -- -C M\ ` ' , • . r 7.7 e�' f� r Sand9�t / - � - 1 1•0• o •\Ce J1�'-.\_'e / li'[;�1jjf�U��t , t . J`-l;: _ . 1 (/' C 1 \ trt Cr r se o /) 29 — y,) 2�• FLYING CLOUD AIRPO�T�J 2' ). 'i-'c > --Th I q).. . 4 ( tt. p' - \.// \ `� 1� r `�\ 711, �ir \�4, `,•Dre in Theater ' -'e7! n ,_ ;---' I a •v Rice L . / f10 \ jam, . . 2 , . --4.. •I ' .. I 1 1 '' 1 :. • 1 I fil . 7 () 4 4 '.•: . • '' Of•I .' ' '1 .... • ' ..,.'V •, r, ' '•- " 3.' ..:.,, . / II , HO LTS ir i •• 'Y ' *.•,' :' .., 3 il ''',‘:°UN 7.7--'\ • ' ': AD9-. . -----. •}, •••.. ',•-.,,. , ,. ,.• ...... ..--,_:_c , s' z •‘',, ie..„... i .: 5 •. r At, . /40 s •:. is ii ,•,. . ..'. '.... CT 0 )4,4 Z ....,' 0 ..,0 z ri 0 ,4 0 • fr 44.04 I(.... . , \ _ I C 1 411 141' . _. r• ..i ITI Tr . .71 MI i i 0 .gc 0 _ ; i!! 1.< i 2 0 cn , 4 o r • o c o • • • ••G -- g o ... a ..1 • g • / . ( •. . . c•1 i 4 i • cc.I . .- N .I , . A.i., ,...r. • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Carl Jullic, City Manager FROM: - Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services�ir—it_ DATE: March 22,.1984 SUBJECT: . Five Year Capital Improvement Program for Eden Prairie Parks and Open Space 1984-1988 'Attached is the proposed Five Year Capital Improvement Program as approved by the Parks, Recretion and Natural Resources Commission at their March 19th meeting. This five year projection is updated on an annual basis and admittedly is only fairly accurate for 1984 (the majority of these projects have not been bid as yet, nor has the City negotiated final acquistion costs on many of the parcels proposed for acquisition); and is less accurate the further into the future projections are made. This capital improvement program does, however, list the parcels that should be acquired within the next five years, as well the majority of the development projects that should be completed within this period to keep the development of the park and open space system in line with the development of the rest of the community. Eden Prairie has only had two park bond referendums; one in 1968 for $550,000, one in 1979 for 3.5 million dollars. It is likely there will be a need for a park bond referendum within the next five years if the City of Eden Prairie begins any of the following projects: 1. Construction of a Senior Citizen Center that will be large enough to provide meeting space and program facilities for the growing number of Seniors in the community. 2. Development of the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area that has been discussed over the last year. 3. Expansion of the Community Center which has also been discussed by a number of special interest groups within the community during the last six months. The purpose of this Five Year Capital Improvement Program is not to promote a park bond referendum in the near future, but to point out to members of the Commission and Council that there arc future needs that will not be met by. grants and cash park fees, as well as to indicate plans for acquisition and development projects for the current year.. This capital improvement program indicates that the City should apply fora LA1'CON a Grant to light two softball fields at Round lake Park and install chain luttht.4t, fence on the six softball fields at Round Lake Park, as well as the baseball field { at 12otmd Lake Park. If the City applies for a 1985 LMCOS Grant for this project, funds will not be received until 19S6. In 1986, the City will have to either construct additional ball fields, light two ball fields, or begin turning down adult softball trues (some new industrial employers may question paying cash park fees if the City does not continue to expand recreation facilities to meet their employee needs). Adult. softball teams will begin paying an extra $60 per team in 1984 to fund these improVrmcnts. 'I'hi:: should generate about $9,500 per year. • _2_ 9 THe CDBG grants indicated in the Capital Improvement Program for 1984 are grants that have already been approved for expenditure of sewer improvements at the Senior Center, and for the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Master Plan. This • plan also suggested Watershed District and City participation in a joint planning effort to determine flood levels within the Purgatory Creek Recreation Arca, as a $20,000 planning project in 1985, as well as Watershed District participation in the development of the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area in the amount of $50,000 a year beginning in 198G. Obviously, these arc all estimates contingent upon need and appropriate approvals. • The Community Services staff request the City Council to approve the Five Year • Capital Improvement Program. This document will be used for submittal for current applications for State and LAWCON funds. City staff„"submit specific reports and recommendations on each project and request 9 authorization to receive bids prior to proceeding with any of the projects proposed on this capital improvement program. BL:md • • • • • • • • • • .)( XR CO „ e 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 o O O o O 0 w N c o 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 8 8 0 0 O N O O n 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . .0 F y� 0 0 0 N N N N 0 N III 0 0 N ny r• M N N N .~-. N M CV tel N N N N ■ M N N N N N N AAA 0. O O O iO O p H O O „ N N V W Y Lm N .Y t O O O YO .Fi`O UO I b O O M O O VI O N A O.4 U 4 O O F N f IA N N g I,cc] U 3 V N O F O . uw 6.1 a E 0 0 t N 4 O 0 0 • 11.1 V O o 0 N N V 0 t II.f M 0.- i. — O O Yee O O N O N O a 0 0 - Xi...0 u 0 40 0 0 t 0 0. U 0 0 6kN 0 YO Yp ) W N uNf >W N YN MN M el ON V. 0 0 0. 04 00.0 . Oo V 0 0 w F H x p o 0 7 0. u0 m O a 8 w m N N .a 0 ^ v.C— 00 F 0A 0 f, gv.' 00 C4..0 .Y V O RY0 V00 0. O trl �. 8 b O7 '" .. KO p ' O 07S LYrO „CEO U0 L 00 F 0,3 H V • NX^• 00 u..o O U N X.FIN •ON 5 NN X Ci Y ON 33 pN >N pN — 0 0 N tf r ft e1A 0 O. wN �5 W ..� n ., A p' O N O. 9 f N O 9 Y o al• o O ✓ o O • 8 8 vi0 0 ., W W N 8 U 8 O O N ^ E O O O 00 0 O 0 s V N O V VI 0 N 8 1 L V O O -N UAN ~N >.N TIE 'UVN .piNN 9N YN ! > F 00 0 p p Y N p U F p �. 4.1 -_-00 n' ✓ 0. lee tel C~0 H w of m 0. U. V O O a F O O p O V „ N C • O V rd .0 p O O O O n y 0 O O O O ' U O• N• O• - 0.O O U o 000 • sHO rv .. �iP ,a..n -N -N iVt p p . 3 U.-. wN YN �. Cam( V 0. M v. V 0. M H Y X y M p •U u: 1+ CN0 . • [pi {. h Y .-i X d Aq • 0 . 9 L u J Y N. p L 4.W Y .i �. .1 n Chi Imo. n N] 60•. U .Y OFi n Y U X y i po O V , O W O Cr. 0 •. 3 O ,.. K OJ F Y Y K le (Y ` b I. J K a p (I K A V e�eJJ �qYf �CEE .0 Y �tl r�i ii V P. L K N SS 4 r+ & 2 :L v S U C U { 6 0.1 VI ' 1 O o 0 0 O O O 0 C p 1` 0 0 o O O O o O 0 yCj p O N N M O of 0 N II yU� CO V/ N N 0 al v0 I eD 1� 'yK� N N H y VI 1� M N 0.A us N N d • Novo• 0 0 M Uo co N . 0 1 ( U S N N p V1 h V) CO1 CO _ Y M [ ~ N O O o O 2 O N 1 O U o o C o U. - Su Of to.0 h O N O 1' co m F V) V) C O S. O • V of, 1 U �0 0 O O , O. M N O O O O • Y O O o x P. Mtn ' to N p 1 . W U d V) ed. p 0. y O 1 O n • 4 w of +S— .c w co ' If) L:o 0 Co O O O N IL G O cif 0 O O o , O U• U.-1 0 O N N- O. o. O. V O td M ,. 3en ... Rd .1. N M 1 co de O N co . a V [ A 0 0 O p .0 O p V NO O O • M O O p W m V 1.,V! N p 0 of v o C of t CO" 1O e v w d��°'" .. 0 0 0 ). p M M u 'Of. Of O. s o i 10 M 1i 1 I • I 00 00 . to 0. N GO - N N rs--i H F n U 0 .. .. 1 • .•7 U y of H M N Op , I-. ao K d • 0 . Lq % 0 0 00 IJ alN Cl 1100 0 ofVl I ) 00ul N t !• o cm H m IC 0. v1 v0 • U. 1 107 0 U O U U 0 -00 i. • U OW w U N N a OM v cm N 0 • ofN 10 VI 0 0 0 0 1 ~ p W1O 0 0 1n Vp 0N - . MN U co • V MN F N ev CO 0 0.-1 h V1 14 N..I N [n Cl edd .pp b I od CO AO CO .Y 411 ClF• [d IO 11 u Cl • •A 1. M O Cl ' 0 e11 eV.4 N ..1 O U ..1 O •Oi R. VVVV 14 D. 0. N m 4 U II.. C. ..~i 0.4 .iG F [- 1. •] f. S f.4) 0t 0 of0 O •1.1 0, W - i. O t (11O .0 CI O O N. 10 C y - 0 C .. 1..f M C' I. 11 1a (3 01 U tI O 0[. 1 a • y CO • od s ': N a 04)) N d in •n ax F o .) . co co O 0 0 0 00 0 0 O H H rn 0 o 0 0 00 0 0 0 o a4 R .-t O 0 u) N O O N N co O m X >..0 co N a 0 0 0 P. N I") •-• 0) N a0 N .1 V1 0 M 03 M tt'� .N . •. k T x V) N .-1 4.1. U v U.4 • H N•O • N FO 01 i H N W y 0Z a o M t-. tog) o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0)� 0 [ co•O Y WQ N N O O O O 0 0 of 0 u1 .4 O 0 .(. 0p 0 N 0 O N u1 O 0 0 W O�O •! a rn m N U •-1 a to o) 0 O t) N M N CO F,.4 Wa r1 N . 0 M 0 0 0•rt . 0 1-. t6 1 V) N V) 1-. a) 0 co k t DO C N 1 0. t co . 1 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0- o o 0 00 7 K N N O O O 0 N N 0 M U d al'tf .O 000 0 u1 N 0 {>.. fa.-. O. O, C. 0 m C. O t, N 00 01 00 M 0 1 .� a 0 N M V3 v et K .d 3 .. Z N N -(? V) V) {6 co b�ca in T. ti CO .. O•ri 1 -, �.4 U r 1. N f 400 4 rn a0 C 4. 4 L co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 G p.N j 0 0) M 0 0 0 0 O u1 0. N 0 N •.i 0 0 a .-i co .1 0 t` O 0 t` M 0 0 0 N.t Q) • ]]1 N d.n P. 0 0 0001 0 N a • N 0 a 0 d 0 [-. N 0 1./1 N k N 'el a i. W N N vo v, �., .r4 d d co ..N v• i t0 m i 11 0) 3 .) U 01 t) .] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO•n ;�, . F a a o N co 0 0 0 .0 1n .1 4/1.00 a. a) No n O O co0O co0O . N o0 co O to C at t 6 .-. co IA V) V)N 0 a C 00 co el td O • 1N N •>. •.C co (N • U..a W 4. 1; W C t• - 0) b 0� t00 N f .oi k .[ Eo• 7 • VOt X.Oi W y Pt-E m 7 •O co t al O D.0 O ` a7 C C U • to N b 4 1 0 In - W 0) 0 0 0) a U 0. Z Td O. K X O G O )' 4 )' a W 1)1).. U ' X 4 d 0 �< W .-. 14 rW U 0 O )- !d gc 44 $ . W N 1-4 k ti N 0 a o d 0) e) Lei $ O. O > >. 01 a r- a 0 k G 0•• r- a o • .. •o .0 v .,•O V. W t7 N 0) •.I ••+ 7 •.i v. -,� d 1-• g u) a w a rm 0 .0 ., ., N 4 ,G+.0 > > w U. ta 0 s U)U. .) sO V) w w el w )-. c'dow !jG� MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resouces Commission FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services pile- 1101: Carl ,Jullie, City Manager DATE: March 15, 1984 ,SUBJECT: Bryant Lake Surface hater Use Ordinance 3. On December 20, 1983, the City Council authorized staff to prepare a draft ordinance 3' that would limit the number of boats allowed on Bryant Lake to 20, would preclude speeds of 15 miles per hour between the hours of Noon-6 p.m. on Sundays, from q Memorial Day through Labor Day, and that an effort be made to educate those who use d the park as well as homeowners as to the new regulations. Subsequently, the City Attorney drafted an ordinance regulating the use of BrynatA. Lake and City staff forwarded a copy of the draft ordinance to the Department of Natural Resources for a preliminary review. ti • Earlier this month, City staff received a letter from Kim Elverum, Boat and Water Safety Coordinator. Mr. Elverum indicated that he does not object to the language in the draft ordinance; however, the City will have to provide information that will verify the need to limit this use on Sundays only,compared to typical restrictions that would control speed on holidays and weekends. This must be submitted when the City makes application for formal approval of the ordinance after the City has adopted the ordinance. • Mr. Elverum also notes that Sections 9,6 and 9.61 of the existing City Code do not 1 comply with the existing State law and suggeAted some revisions. 'k At this time, City staff requests the City Council to approve the first reading of 81 Oriinance No.23-84 and authorize staff to request formal approval of this ordinance by the Department of Natural Resoucres. The ordinance does not refer to limiting the number of boats to 20; however, Hennepin County Park Reserve District staff have agreed that 20 is a reasonable number of boats when planning the development of the new boat launch and parking facilities. There are no facts or figures that justify the City's request to control speed on Bryant Lake on Sundays only, other than the fact that this will allow for a variety , of users - runabouts and water skiers on Saturdays, sailing and canoeing and fishermen on Sundays. / Bh.:md 1 . 517 • • ORDINANCE NO. 23-84 (' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OP EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNE:SOPA, AMENDING CITY CODE C1LAPTER 9 BY R UMBERING PRESET sirrION 9.62 AS 9.63; AND BY RLSUMr3ERING PRESENT SLXTION 9.63 AS 9.64; AND BY ADDING si rla7 9.62 RELATING TO RFLULATIOV OF THE USE OF BRYANT IAKE; AND ADOPTING BY REFER1NCE CITY CODE C ArTER 1 AND SECTION 9.99 WHICH, AMONG OI'RF.R THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Chapter 9 shall be and is amended by renumbering present Section 9.62 as 9.63, and by renumbering present Section 9.63 as 9.64. Section 2. City Code Chapter 9 shall be and is amended by adding thereto Section 9.62 which reads as follows: SEC. 9.62. REGUI}.TION OF USE OF BRYANT LAKE. Subd. 1. It is unlawful for any person to operate any boat, vessel or watercraft on Bryant Lake in excess of 15 miles per hour from noon until 6 p.m. on Sundays from Memorial Day through Labor Day Weekend. • Subd. 2. It is unlawful for any person to tow one or more persons or to be towed behind a watercraft on water skis, aquaplane, surfboard, saucer, innertnh , or similar device on Bryant Lake, unless two ccepo-ent persons are on the watercraft. The driver of such watercraft must watch where the water- craft is being driven at all tires. The second person on board the watercraft shall be an observer, and shall watch the person or persons being toned at all times. Inhere this provision conflicts with Section 9.60, Subd. 3.N., this provision shall control. Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Defini- tions Applicable to the Entire City Code including Penalty for Violation" and Section 9.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. • Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of • , 1984, and finally read and • adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1984. • ATTEST: • • • • City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1984. ' • STATE OF DEPA RTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES BOX 46 , CENTENNIAL OFFICE BUILDING • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • 55155 'DNR INFORMATION (612)296.6157 FILE NO. • Robert Lambert Director of Conunnity Services City of Eden Prairie • 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2499 March 6, 1984 • Dear Mr. Lambert: I have informally reviewed both the proposed amendment to City Code Chapter Nine and the two enacted sections -- 9.60 and 9.61. Here are my cauments: Bryant Lake Proposal - Sub3. 1. - The term "Memorial Day Weekend" should be used here instead of "Memorial Day." This is a problem we { encountered on the St. Croix River where the Saturday and Sunday before Memorial Day were not originally included in a restriction. Another point here is the Sunday only provision which is or should be backed-up by your public and Hennepin County Park Reserve District input when you make the application for formal approval. - Subd. 2. - This section will require a backup when submitted formally -- noting such items as congestion, etc. Section 3. - Please see my comments on Sec. 9.60. Sections 9.60 and 9.61 - Although neither of these sections which have been enacted by the City were part of the new proposal which you submitted, they were referred to in the new section. It should be noted that neither of these sections 9,61 0.4.0.4 has been approved by the DNR (assuming they were enacted 0/7y subsequent to January 1, 1975), as required by M.S. 378.32 and our Water Surface Use Management Pe].es. I am not going to make any specific ccein nts on these sections except to say that they should be revised and sulitted for approval as required by law if they were passed since 1975. Once again I would he happy to assist you. I hope that this has been of some help. The Bryant Lake ordinance proposal appears sound and well thought out, but ,_t,(. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 1 .. x page 2 ' I would urge you to contact me on the revision and submission of Sections 9.60 and 9.62. Please remember that this is not the formal approval required by M.S. 378.32 and our Water Surface Use Rules. When you do submit materials for final approval please remember to include city council minutes, a map, reasons for ordinance adoption and the final proposed ordinance. As always, feel free to contact me if you have questions or need assistance. • • ??In E• t ter Safety ordinator • KAE:ps cc: WSUM Task Force • • • • { MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council • • MIRU: . Carl Jullic, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: March 6, 1984 SUBJECT: Community' Education/Recreation Duplication •, • Attached to this memo are the following background reports: • 1. December 20, 1983 memo from the Community Services Director to the Mayor and City Council outlining the history of the concern of duplicating services between the City and the School. 2. A December 29, 1983 memo from the Recreation Supervisor to the Mayor and City Council regarding the elimination-of the Recreation Supervisor position. • 3. A February 29, 1984 memo to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resouces • Commission from the Director of Community Services outlining the Commission discussion at the January 16th and February Gth meetings of • the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. • 4. A March 1, 1984 memo from the Recreation Supervisor to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission regarding transferring recreation programs from the City to the School. • • I 2% 5. A March,E, 1984 letter from the chairman of the Eden Prairie Historical and Cultural Commission urging the City to retain Sandy Werts in a full-time capacity. At the March 5th meeting, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission considered the information provided by City staff, as'well as the information provided by School District staff at the February 6th meeting. Pat Breitenstein indicated that she basically agreed with Marty Jessen, that the City should not transfer recreation program responsibilities to the School District because the City is responsible for providing a wide variety of recreation services, not merely athletic programs, and this transfer of program responsibilities is the first step in that direction. Other Commission members were uncomfortable transferring these program responsibil- ities to the School without being sure that there would be continued well rounded offering of recreational services to the citizens of Eden Prairie. The Commission took the following action: MOTION: Baker moved that the City Council request the School to consider going back to a joint brochure, and that the Co:scunity Services Department continue offering recreation oriented instructional programs throughout the City, and that the Community Education Department limit their pro- gram activities to education oriented instructional programs; however, if the City Council determines that itis in the best interest of the ).t I. ..... ._._.--�... ...... R • -2- of the citizens of Eden Prairie to transfer those services to the • School District that the Council discuss the possibility of a Joint ' Powers Agreement with the School District to jointly support the Recreation Supervisor position. Seconded by Kingrey, passed unanimously. The intent of the motion was that if the responsibility for instructional recreation programs is transferred to the School District; the Recreation Supervisor position would still be a full-time position from May through September. During the months of October through April that position might be half-time with the School and half- time with the City to assist the School in offering the additional programs they would be picking up. A very major concern of Commission members was the elimination or reduction of a full-time position that is held by a staff person that has worked for the City for ten years. -The Community Services staff emphasized to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission that there is only a guesstimate that transferring these program responsib- ities to the School District would save the citizens of Eden Prairie, within the Eden Prairie School District, a net savings of perhaps $10,000-$15,000. This is only true if the School does not have to hire additional staff to pick up this additional work load. School District staff indicated that they are very comfortable, willing, and able to pick up the additional work load; however, they are also very comfortable f working with the City under the existing conditions of attempting to separate the L recreation oriented programs from the educational oriented programs. The Community Services staff is obviously also equally comfortable in operating under this principle. • Staff requests the City Council to decide if the City should pursue the idea of transferring program responsbilities to the School District at this time. Both School and City staff need several months lead time to make this change over, if it is to occur. BL:md - r Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission March 5, 1984 - 6 - ` 4. Broomball League Report . This is an information item. 1. • Baker inquired if there could be a central place • for when and where information on community events. Breitenstein suggested something be put together in the newspaper. She also said cable T.U. might be a possibility. Baker.will follow this up. I. Baker inquired as to how much it would cost to get another set of Broomball goals. Lambert replied !}' that he thought it would cost about 050. Baker suggested that this be put on the list of possible civic club donations. 5. Council Report - February 21, 1984 . Lambert informed the Commission that Moe Cook and Jesse Schwartz are the newly appointed Commission q members. Lambert also said that the increase in Cash Park Fees 1 was approved. . . 4 VI. OLD BUSINESS . i A. Community Education/Recreation Duplication Lambert read a letter from Barbara Johnson, Chairman of Eden Prairie Historical and Cultural Commission regarding Sandra Wcrts' position. (see attached Letter) ( i Lambert stated that there are really two questions to be answered. J/1- Should the City of Eden. Prairie continue to offer recreation instructional programs or should that be tranferred to the School District? • l /#2- If it is transferred to the School, how does that affect the Recreation Supervisor's position? Can that position be expanded to other areas or should it become a part-time position? Lambert felt the Commission should think about what is best for the citizens of Eden Prairie. Lambert stated that he personally is comfortable with the change or status quo. 4 The reason this; issue was brought up to the Parks. 1 • Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission is because ( the City Council asked the Conznission to look into tho t duplication of services. Baker inquired as to what exactly is the Commission's understanding of the School's intention regarding; this • matter. . 593A ' 1 • Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission March 5, 1984 • C!i Lambert stated that the School is willing to take on Eden Prairie's Community Education, but they are • comfortable with the way it is run now. The School does recommend one brochure. Lambert felt that if the School did take over the Community Education, they • • would not expand their staff. Breitenstein co-""ented that she felt that in the last - five years there hasn't been as much duplication as there had been. She said she thinks the School and the City have been working together more in recent years. • Kingrey commented that the reason it has been going so smoothly is because the School really hasn't done much • regarding Community Education. He also said that he thinks this is going to change and then there night be a bigger • problem as Community Education expands. Baker inquired as to how much money we would be saving the taxpayers if we transferred Community Education to • the Schools. Lambert replied that he has no figures regarding this but his guess was that if the City made The Recreation Supervisor into a part-time position, the • taxpayers would be saving half of a salary. • • (•) Breitenstein stated that she felt that there are programs that should be run by the City. She also said that a lot of people feel Sandra Werts' job is very important and the City needs the exposure. She also stated that Ms: Worts and Ms. Utah should just work closer together. The commissioners all felt there should be one brochure for the City and the School's programs. Baker expressed the opinion that by handing over Community Education to the Schools, the quality would not be improved and the costs would not decrease. Kingrey inquired as to what would happen to the recreation • supervisor job if Community Education was tranferred to the Schools. Lambert replied that it would probably become a half-time position. Kingrey then asked if it would be possible for the School to employ Sandra Worts during the school year to help with the recreation programming. Lambert felt. that was not a possiblity. • MOTTO Baker moved that the Parks, Recreation, and • 75i371 Resources Commission does recommend a joint • • brot:hure. Second]y, the Parks, Recreation, and • ;; that the City Natural llc::ourcr.:; Cc 'i: ::lon recommends l reto%r, the city aper.i'tea "nre:ctlon programs and the school operated education pro;;r;u,:s. But, if the City Council dac13::; to transfer these operations to the School.. the Coo:;:icalon recommends that they discuss { Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission , March 5, 1984 with the School Board the possibility of a shared staff. 1. • Kingrey seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. B. Plnystructure Bids for Red Rock Pnrk and Lake Trail Estates Refer to memo dated March 1 , 1984 from Stephen Calhoon, Park Planner Lambert stated that on February 29, 1984, staff received and publicly read bids for neighborhood playstructures to be installed at Red Rock Park and High Trails Estates Park. 1 Bids were received from six playstructure manufacturers. '. The Community Services Staff recommends that the proposal from Big Toys, Inc. be approved. MOTION: Baker ' moved to approve the proposal from Big Toys, Inc. for playstructures at Red Rock Park and High Trails Estates Park. Cook seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. VII. NEW BUSINESS _ ( None VIII. ADJOURNMENT .. I Kingrey moved and Baker seconded the motion to adjourn at 10:00 p.m. It carried unanimously. . Respectfully Submitted, . Karen Eno • . . Recording; Secretary • CY S93 G March 22, 1984 An open letter to the Mayor and City Council of Eden Prairie... At our March first meeting, the Eden Prairie Historical and Cultural Commission was informed of the pending action to cut the staff position of Sandy Werts. I am writing to express the dismay of the Commission about this matter. Sandy has been an integral part our work since the Commission was founded in 1976. Her basic understanding and knowledge of how government works have been invaluable at our meetings. She is always organized and well prepared. Sandy also has a deep personal commitment to our projects and to the community of Eden Prairie. Her long hours are witness to that fact. She is always in attendance at our functions - evenings or weekends. Although Sandy's schedule keeps her very busy planning and coordinating community service events, she provides us as volunteers with much needed resource information and encouragement to carry out our programs. Sandy Werts serves Eden Prairie well. z Sincerely, Barbara Johnson Chairman Eden Prairie Historical and Cultural Commission N1iMORANDUM • TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural'Resources Commission FROM:- Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services f'?L � DATE: February 29, 1984 • SUBJECT: Community Education/Recreation. Duplication At the January 16th meeting and again at the February Gth meeting, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission reviewed the history of the discussions between the City and the School regarding the concern of duplicating services be- tween the City's Community Services Recreation Programs and the School's Community Education Programs. On January 16th, after a lengthy discussion, the majority of the Commissioners agreed there should not be a duplication of services, however, • there was a question on whether the School Community Education Department could provide those services as well as the City of Eden Prairie. At that meeting, Raker moved to support the continued offering of these services, and to invite the members • of the Community Education Advisory Committee, the Superintendent of Schools, and the Community Education Coordinator to discuss the future of community education in Eden Prairie. On February 6th, Superintendent, Jerry McCoy, Dr. Judy Cooper, Assistant Super- intendent. and Jeanne Zetah, Community Education Coordinator were present to discuss the School District's willingness to cooperate with the City of Eden Prairie regard- ing community education programs and recreational services. Dr. McCoy suggested that there should be one brochure for community education and recreation, and he indicated that the School District is willing and able to take over the community education and recreation instructional programs offered in the school buildings that are presently offered by the City of Eden Prairie. At the February 6th meeting, Chairman Jcssen suggested that everyone think about wha; was said and requested that staff bring this item back to the Commission for con- sideration at the March Sth meeting. • Some of the discussion over the decision to transfer those program responsibilities to the School District revolved around the future status of the existing full-time position of Recreation Supervisor. Chairman Jessen suggested that the Commission should look at the Recreation Super- visor position to see if there isn't other program areas that we should be expand- ing prior to deciding to either eliminate this position or reduce this full-time position to a part-time position. The Community Services staff concur with Mr. Jessen's recommendation and request that the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission address that as a separate issue at the April 16th meeting; at which time staff will have a recommenda- tion on that position. Staff does recommend, however, that the Commission make a recommendation to transfer responsibility to offer instructional progams taking 9 place within the school building to the Community Education Department. •lbe City • of Eden Prairie would continue to offer all recreation programs taking place in the Community Center, at the Senior Citizen Center, within City parks, and other City facilities. as well as continuing to offer trips or recreation programs or offering experiences outside of the community. • 111.:md 1 . 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Sandra F. Werts, Recreation Supervisor DATE: December 29, 1983 SUBJECT: Elimination of Recreation Supervisor Position At the request of the Director of Community Services, this memo is to highlight those services that would be eliminated or reduced should the City Council choose to eliminate the Recreation Division of the Community Services Department. My understanding is that the primary impetus for this consideration is the concern over duplication of services between the City's Community Services Department and the Eden Prairie School's Community Education Program. According to Bob Lambert's memo to the Council of December 20 "Superintendent McCoy and Dr. Cooper were both hesitant to support a Joint Powers Agreement because, in their opinion, that would restrict the School District's opportunity to expand and develop the Community Education position." Having not been involved in any of the meetings with the School District, to further determine the intent and directions of community educa- tion, it is unclear to me whether recreation services to the community would be dimin- ished, enhanced or unchanged. The thrust of community education has been and continues 4 to be "educationally oriented" as opposed to "recreationally oriented". Accordingly, it would only be conjecture to determine the loss of recreation services in the community in terms of quality or quantity until the School District commits in writing its intent to financially support recreation oriented programs in addition to educational programs. However; should i.t be the City's desire to fully eliminate the Recreation Supervisor position itbecomes necessary to examine the cost and ability to provide those remaining services as those remaining functions comprise approximately 70% of the work performed by the Recreation Supervisor. • Other programs administered by the Recreation Supervisof include: 1. Community Band - The City has sponsored this group for the past 10 years. During the last three years the group has expanded from a summer band to a year-round band. The Recreation Supervisor coordinates with the band director in setting up and publicizing concerts in addition to providing various administrative support services. As the hand becomes more known, community groups have requested their services for many events. The loss of this program would be disappointing to participants and residents alike. 2. Community Gardens - The City leases about 150 gardens in two locations. Thisiis a highly visible program, revenue producing, and much appreciated by the participants. 3. Ski Trips - The Recreation Supervisor offers 5-6 ski trips to middle and senior high youth each season. Every year the number of participants grow. 4. Adult Special Trips - As the population has grown, the interest in adult day trips has also increased, with 1-2 trips being offered each quarter. 1 -2- 5. Other Special Events - Over the Christmas holidays, in addition to other • • times of the year, trips and activities are planned for youth during their vacation days. 6. Lifetime Sports and Leisure Time Instruction - Alpine skiing, cross country skiing, tennis, golf lessons and other similar classes are not offered in the school but are a part of the City's program. These have been well attended and demand grows. 7. Kids Kerner - This social recreation program for 3-44 year old children has • been a high quality and well respected program. Each quarter all sections arc filled within 2 days of the beginning of registration. It is also a program that continues in the summer at the neighborhood parks. To give this up to the School District would mean losing part of a successful summer program. 8. The Historical and Cultural Commission - The members of this Commission are working hard to make this a visible and viable Commission in the City. They have two working subcommittees with which the Recreation Supervisor assists - the Performing Arts Committee and Art-in-City. Hall. Last year the Commission launched a very successful summer concert series, and is working on other types of performances for the coming year. The Recreation Supervisor does most preliminary work for these events and assists members in other necessary tasks in addition to providing all administrative support services. 9. Restoration Committee - The Recreation Supervisor serves as staff liaison to this committee and its subcommittees, plus is project manager for the current restoration project. As staff liaison, the Recreation Supervisor has written grant proposals, kept in contact with the State Historical Society and provided other required support services. In his December 20, 1983 memo, the Director of Community Services recommended that the additional following responsibilities of the Recreation Supervisor be absorbed by other staff or hire part-time people to carry out the responsibilities: beach operations, skating rink supervision, summer recreation programs and the liaison to the Historical and Cultural Commission. However, Bob Lambert informed me that after discussion with other department staff, they could not pickup these additional duties without their current responsibilities suffering unless additional support staff were hired. In summary, if the City Council desires to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement with the Eden Prairie School District for the provision of school based recreation programs, I recommend that the City Council retain the Recreation Supervisor position as a three quarter time position. The Recreation Supervisor would continue to carry out the leisure recreation programs that are not school based, would retain responsibility for the beach operations, skating rink supervision, the summer recreation progams and continue as staff liaison to the Historical and Cultural Commission and Restoration Committee. This would ensure the continuity of the same or enhanced level of services which residents of the City of Eden Prairie now receive. SW:md • it . f MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City_Council THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager ' FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: December 20, 1983 SUBJECT: Community Education/Recreation•Duplication For many years there has been a great deal of discussion between the City and the School regarding the concern of duplicating services between the City's Community Services Recreation Programs and the School's Community Education Programs. • During the 1984 budget review process, the Eden Prairie City Council requested City staff to contact staff from the School District to discuss the possibility of entering into a Joint Powers Agreement with the School District for providing recreation services. Several Council members expressed continued concern re- garding the existing apparent duplication of services, between the School Community Education Department and the City's Community Services Department, that seemed very evident with the separate brochures this Fall. The School's Community Education Director is responsible for developing evening leisure time "educational" programs for the community. An example of the programs offered by Community Education during the Fall of 1983 arc: crochet, beginning knitting, candle wicking, bread making, microwave cooking, woodworking, duck decoy carving, pottery pleasure, oil painting, piano lessons, ballroom dance, beginning and intermediate bridge. These programs are an example of the recreation oriented "education" programs offered by Community Education during the Fall of 1983. During that same period, the following list is an example of the after school or evening leisure time programs offered by the City in a separate brochure: Exploring Music, Baton w Dance, Jr. Jazzercise, Dog Obedience, Calligraphy, Hatha Yoga, Firm, Fit 5 Fantastic, Thin Your Thighs and Firm Your Bottom, Jazzercise, • Guitar, Cider Making, Karate. It seems quite apparent that these types of pro- grams are very similar to the types of programs offered by Community Education. On November 1, City staff met with the School District staff to discuss a possible Joint Powers Agreement. At that time, the possibility of several forms of a Joint Powers Agreement: were discussed including the possibility of combining the Recreation Supervisor and the Community Education Director into one position. At that meeting, Superintendent McCoy and Dr. Cooper were both hesitant to support a Joint Powers .Agreement because, in their opinion, that would restrict the School District's opportunity to expand and develop the Community Education postion. } • After a great deal of discussion, the possibility of the Community Education Pro- gram assuming all of the after school and evening recreation programs offered in the schools was considered. The School District staff requested time to consider this possibility. On Thursday, December 15, City staff again met with School District staff and S agreed that it does not make sense for the City and the School District to have two people providing similar types of recreation programs. The School needs a Community Fducaition Director to coordinnte the public use of school facilities1. after school hours and to develop some of the new community education progams in the areas of computers and through the new public access provided by cable TV. 1 • -2- If there is to be a change from the present situation, it appears as though the City would have to transfer the responsibilities of providing leisure service programs within the schools to the School District. The City would maintain the responsibility of providing summer playground programs and instructional programs for recreation facilities outside the schools such as programs within the parks and the Community Center, as well as all of the athletic programs that arc offered within the schools. The City would cease to offer the leisure skill programs such as Jazzercise, Aerobic Dance, Dog Obedience, Kids Korner, etc. If the City agrees to transfer the responsibility of those programs to the School District, the Recreation Supervisor position would cease to be a full-time position within the Community Services Department. The City would have to transfer that position's other responsibilities to existing staff or part-time staff: 1. The beach operations could be transferred to the Aquatic Supervisor. 2. The Skating Rink Supervisor could be transferred to the responsiblity of the Community Center Manager. 3. The Summer Recreation Programs could be supervised by a seasonal summer Recreation Supervisor. That program could be developed and overall supervision could come under the Director of Community Services, the Community Center Manager or the Athletic Coordinator (this to be determined in the future if necessary). 4. The City could either contract for a liaison to the Historical and Cultural Commission or transfer that responsibility to another existing staff person. The effect this change would have on the City might be a savings of approximately $10,000 an there would be some loss of service to the community with the elimina- tion of a full-time staff person. The Recreation Supervisor has been requested to provide additional information on what services would be eliminated if the City follows this course of action. The School District is hiring a new Community Education Director. If the City were to eliminate the Recreation Supervisor position, I would recommend that we retain that position until the end of August to allow a smooth transition, not only to other City staff for these responsibilities, but also to the new Community Education Director. The Director of Community Services and the City Manager have disussed this proposed change at Iength and feel that this may provide improved services to the citizens of Eden Prairie by clarifying the roles of Community Education and Community Services, and would eliminate the real or apparent duplication of services by these two agencies. in a City with the School District boundaries and the City boundaries nearly identical, it shouldn't make any difference who provides the services as long as the services arc provided at the least cost to the participant. Unless the Council directs staff differently, staff would intend to take this item to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission for discussion and recommendation at the January lb meeting. Bl.:md Jv/ 3 MEMORANDA` • TO: Mayor and City Council 111RU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: March 22, 1984 SUBJECT: Minnesota North Star Addition • As per the agreement between the City of Eden Prairie and the North Stars Financial Corporation, dated March G, 1983, prior to the construction of the North Star Addition plans and specifications must be submitted by the North Stars to the City of Eden Prairie no later than February 15, 1984. That agreement further stated that the North Stars Addition shall be structurally and aesthetically similar to and compatible and integrated with the Community Center. The North Stars Addition shall include showers, whirlpool, lockers, training room, equipment storage and repair room, and laundry area and office, and such other equipment and facilities as the North Stars reasonably determine are necessary for a locker room and training facility". The City must accept in writing these plans prior to the North Stars proceeding with construction. Upon acceptance by the City of the plans and specifications, the North Stars shall • commence construction of the North Stars addition by May 1, 1984, and shall complete • the construction of the North Stars addition no later than September 1, 1984. City staff have reviewed the plans and specifications provided by the North Stars. A copy of a memo from Chuck Pappas is attached to this memorandum. The Building Inspection Department and the Fire Marshall have also reviewed and approved the plans with minor modifications that have been forwarded to'the architect. A reduced copy of the North Star addition is attached to this memo. A colored render- ing will be provided at the March 27th meeting to show the Council how the color scheme will match the existing building. The existing blocks and existing colors will be matched (hopefully without leaks). The Community Center was constructed on City property as determined by a survey pro- vided by RCM during the construction of the Round Lake Park facilities. The original survey indicated that the northern most corner of the Community Center was 35' south of the east/west property line between the School and the City. That survey also indicated that the western most corner of the Community Center was 20' east of the north/south property line. The City requested Hanson, Thorp and Pellinan, Inc. to Provide a legal description for the North Stars addition. They provided the City of fden Prairie a survey that showed the northern most corner of the existing facility being 35' south of the east/west School property line; however, they showed the western most portion of the Community Center ns extending 55' into the School property. the City requested RCM to verify their original survey. As of this writing, they have not reported the findings to the City. - 1 • �- z. ,, <.)„, — - 2 - ..._. I i -- 4 Ez;) ,,xs i'I L i _la 1 i tl ,,,;.'--i? ' ,., ;21 it t 17.-FT 1 N 2 pi ;y - III-_ Tii 6 Y.! <a Will il• f. 5 a,i 1 rl"",_11 :, _, t� c�.li Fht/ l '�t _.. �. i ( 1 In either case, the North Stars addition will be completely on City property; however, f the City will be requesting the School allow a portion of the construction staging area to extend onto School property. The access road to the rear of the facility will also have to extend onto School property. City staff requests Council author- ization to forward this request to School officials, Staff hopes to have the informa- tion on the exact location of the School/City property line by Tuesday evening's meeting. { Staff recommends the City Council approve the North Stars addition with the changes requested by the Fire Marshall and the Building Inspection Department, as well as the following recommendation by the Community Center Manager: 1. Electrical contractor make arrangements for a separate metering device • to be connected to the power main of the building prior to construction r • to relieve the City of Eden Prairie of any financial responsibility for any and all additional power consumption due to construction of the North Stars addition. 2 That a security system for the North Stars addition be tied into the existing system of the Community Center, and that the North Stars arrange for.accessibility by the Public Safety Department. 3. Require that an area the width of the overhead Zamboni door that extends from that door to the settling pond remain open and free of obstruction from vehicles, materials, excavated fill, etc. throughout the entire • construction process. 4. Recommend the addition of a shower curb in the player shower area. - S. Ensure that shower heads on the shower poles are not sprayed directly out the shower room entrance. . 6. Install an additional drain in the toilet area in room 103. 7. Require an additional water shut off valve located in the new addition that would control the main feed just after,it entered the addition. 8. Equip door 111B with two separate locks; one keyed for the City; one keyed for the North Stars. 9. Equip door 111A with a plate that would allow installation of a second' lock if needed in the future. Upon City Council approval of these plans and changes, the North Stars will advertise 1 for bids for construction to begin by May 1S, 1984. - - ; BL:md . . - ( • - • . GJ • MEMORANDUM . • TO: • Robert Lambert, Director of Community Services FROM: Charles Pappas, Community Center Manager /* DATE: March 21, 1984 SUBJECT: Minnesota North Star Addition • As per the informational Project Manual for the Minnesota North Star's addition .to the Eden Prairie Community Center, as supplied by Smiley, Glotter and Asso- ciates, the following points are offered for your consideration: • 1. "Section 16600 Special Systems 16650 Temporary Services - Light and Power 1. General (A.) The Electrical Contractor shall use the owners existing metered electrical system to provide light and power required for construction." Staff recommends the electrical contractor make arrangements for a separate metering device to be connected to the power main of the building prior to . construction to relieve the City of Eden Prairie of any financial responsibility 4 for any and all additional power consumption due to the construction of the • North Star addition. . • • 2. Section 16700 Communications • 1 16750 Fire Alarm System . 16760 Door Security System 16750 Fire Alarm System item #2. "Extend 4 #14 TW from existing station circuits 1 • to new automatic detectors horns, smoke detectors and manual stations in the new addition." 4 16760 Door Security System item #1 "Furnish and install an addition to the 1 existing Simplex door alarm system for operation on 120 volts, GO 8z. as shown j on the drawings. when the system j In both cases, these systems are being tied into the existing systems of the Community Center. It appears that the City would then assume all liability for monitoring the fire and security of a facility inaccessible by City employees. City liability, it appears, would also increase in the event of a system malfunction. Perhaps a separate security system should be recommended and wired directly to a iseparate monitoring system. i ' 3. Section 01505 - Temporary Facilities page 4 of 4 4 Staff would recommend the addition of another item following the item labeled "Workmen's Parking". The additional item would read as follows: Zamboni Access Arcs: An area, the width of the overhead 2amboni door that extends ! • from the overhead '::amboni door to the settling pond will remain open and free from obstruction from vehicles, materials, excavated fill, etc. throughout the entire construction process. "if • I -2- • 6 As per the informational mechanical drawings for the Minnesota North Star's addition to the Eden Prairie Community Center as supplied by Smiley, Glotter and Associates, the following points are offered for your consideration: 1. Recommend the addition of a shower curb in the players shower area E • • to avoid,water in Lay and hair dryer area. 2. Situate shower heads on shower pole to not spray directly out • shower room entrance. 3. Installation of an additional drain in toilet area 103. Located in • front of partition between Lays and urinals. • 4. Staff would also suggest en additional water shut off valve; located' • in the new addition, that would control the main feed just after it entered the addition. 5. Door 111A provides access from the North Star addition to the outside, ' on the Northwest side of the building. • Door 111B provides access to the Ice Arena from the North Star addition, on the interior South East side of the building. In order that each facility be controlled by it's respective owners, to insure authorized admittance and avoid unauthorized useage, 2 options are available: 1. Add a second door in the opening now controlled by door 111B, which leads into the Ice.Arena. Door 111B would be controlled by the North Stars. The second door would be controlled by City Staff. The North Stars could not gain access to the Arena until City staff unlocked the 2nd door. By the same token, City staff could not enter the North Star addition until the North Stars unlocked their door. This would be a costly alternative. 2. The 2nd option would be to equip door 111E with 2 seperate locks. It Cwould take a City Key and a North Star Key to open this door into the ice arena. Stall recommends option #2 as being the more feasible solution. Door 111A, at present, will lead to the outside of the North Star addition. • There is not a need, at this time, to provide 2 seperate locks at this doorway. In the event of a future expansion of the Community Center's Ice facilities, a second ice sheet would run parallel to the existing ice sheet. Access to the second ice sheet, by the North Stars, would be through Door 111A. In consider- ation} of just such a future expansion, staff recommends the installation of a plate, in door 111A, to allow for the installation of a second lock, thus allowing the operation of doorway 111A on the same basis as doorway 111B. • ' • • • • • 4 602 • i } ynOrxi-YLINg-/ r--`�?4 ,_=-_--'_ --• ._ r , —' �. •5D1 x l a C.o��1'aTP-t1L�T1'�1 / � '�.•._ —\ o- .1 5Tf,11-1v. P, A k \ /. F �,� 0zLC:; ;I/ \ � i ;• N • /r la/ . J•I. ,.1.• . \ `.I- Tot? Pi''-1'L'`fo.i C .(G • / .. .i, ,< d i; I1. ;: 1 �t ii 1 rr, a .1. •1yZp "(l-PCF� 1J 7P' {�1t� j..,� i;� - n' • c i.N'{'.-C J"T' V +'- C 1,. ,' 1 ' ' '. Di✓Ek-R-0H j1 41:3 .u•� /�1 ! 5,c161T11`1l9 j�l_DC� • 1 1ti1r , t i( , i• f N , 1 1 J i,• i• ,1 i . t: • i 7. .y• • i i. {i I.i..;j:' #1 ;I , , .ii -1 f! i• • ,i i, , 31•d , 1 .;j 1 ;11 f . j • ii t, r ` ! ..1 Li" " r is ,,' (r , r 1. 1 lj t , i • •• • 5 1 t 3 7 1 • • I } i • '. • t • 1 I. .7%.1 ,.St' • .. ', } • i •i -I) i/ ' 1-03� :74 •t a ri it;,! • • • • i Q fig! y1,. i , /. - -'/' � \� .. Jam' •�'. `. ' '� �`� U, \ \ �` ..„-• �f / �V�1� 1 ',�' \ 'L 1 r . 1� p, ~\—' l`�0I___ (.03, , V i'i • _. CENT'& &SAT SURVEY FOR: City of Eden Prairie -- • t Description of Area of Proposed Building Addition to Comi_uni y Center . part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 22 We `. 'rincipal Meridian, described as follows: -- . Commencing at the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence c an assumed bearinn of South 88 degrees 05 minutes 12 seconds East, along the south line of sal. I Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 134.52 feet; thence North 01 degrees 54 minutes 43 seconds East a distance of 963.74 feet to the point of beginning of the land to : described; thence North 52 degrees 07 minutes 37 seconds West a distance of 24.02 feet; thence South 37 degrees 55 minutes 36 seconds West a distance of 104.33 feet; thence South 52 degrees a. 07 minutes 37 seconds East a distance of 24.02 feet; thence North 37 degrees 55 minutes 36 seconds East a distance of 104.33 feet to said point of beginning. ... - .-Sov/O/ RC of - 4oi 6a// fic-4/ /' I:. 588°0S./z."• zoa9...1 •.24.0L1 N.82'07'9>"W • (�vi%s/i;i0 AI-Z ,0.7 h"11 .1" ' Pr( seW 7 ` 1 y\ok .4, • f A i) • �''° 3J cer — —' _ y•�9• t� - •: a A T. • MEMORANDUM V. TO: Mayor and City Council T1ERU: Carl Jullie, City Manager - FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services rk-- DATE: March 22, 1984 ' SUBJECT: Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Draft Master Plan • "t. On March 7, 1984, City staff and the planning team of Wirth and Associates and i Saunders-Thalden Associates started the presentation process for final review of the Draft Master Plan for the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area. At 2 p.m., in the afternoon, a presentation was made to the property owners requesting they approve the plan and commit to dedication of the floodplain, and assessments of cash park fees, if that is a viable alternative as a funding source. Of the 12 property owners that own floodplain property, 8 were in favor of the plan :,, ' and 4 property owners either would not comment or did not attend the meeting. Of the 8 property owners in favor of the plan, 6 were willing to commit to dedication of the floodplain, free of charge; 2 were not willing to commit at this time. The major concern of the property Owners was the question as to whether the plan would work i.e. would the property be dry enough to maintain park grasses, would k it be usable during the majority of the year. On March 7th, in the evening, the Watershed District reviewed the Draft Master Plan and continued the item to their April 4th meeting, as the Board of Managers had many questions of their engineering staff regarding how this plan relates to the water management program. The Board of Managers had no problem with the plan itself, but would not take any action at this time. On Monday, March 12th, the Planning Commission reviewed the Draft Master Plan and approved the Draft Master Plan as presented recognizing that the proposed funding methods may not be viable. On Monday, March 19th, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission reviewed the Draft Master Plan and approved the Draft Master Plan with the following recommends - tions for change: 1. Eliminate 12 of the 18 park shelters leaving only 1 park shelter in the southern portion east of the southern parking lot; two in the northern portion between the northern two ponds; and three around the boat basin. The Commission felt that these park shelters were the only ones close enough to parking that would actually be used • by picnic groups, families, etc. 2. Eliminate the pedestrian walkway on the north side of the southeastern i pond. The plan refers to this area as a natural area that would be used for wildlife, duck nesting habitat, etc. The trail in this location would discourai;e that type of use. This also is located in a very wet portion of the park. 3. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission was not in favor of committing all of the cash park fees within the service area of this / J -2- Th, park toward this park. The City does not do that for any other area within the City and should not begin with this park. ;t` 4. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission agreed that until the ten year and twenty-five year flood elevations arc determined, the City sould not proceed with plans and specifications for the park. 5. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission also agreed . that it does make sense to request the Watershed District to determine if the 100 year flood storage level can be lowered by a foot to a foot and a half by flood control structures upstream, as well as allowing some increase in flood elevation in Staring Lake. Neither staff nor the Commission are saying at this time that that should happen; however, staff and the Commission agree that a study should be made to determine #,.. if this is feasible without any detrimental affects upstream or down- stream as this would greatly improve the chances for maintaining a �• park in the Purgatory Creek Floodplain. If the floodplain elevation were lowered, property owners would have to agree not to encroach ,. beyond the existing 824 or existing fill limits. Staff has indicated throughout this process that the City should not proceed on • development of this park until there is a commitment from all property owners to dedicate all of their floodplain property, free of charge. It appears questionable n at this time if all of the property owners are willing to du that prior to develop- f ment of their site. If that is the case, staff would still recommend the City Council approve the Master Plan at this time and use this plan as we have used the Purgatory Creek Study in requiring dedication, easements, etc. from adjacent developers. The City could also require adjacent developers to develop portions of the ponding system as a part of their storm water drainage plan, and simply bank the cash park fees that are collected from this area in a separate interest earning fund that would be used for development of this site. The site itself would then be developed probably • over a ten to fifteen year period in various stages, or perhaps very quickly the City approves a referendum to complete development of the site. City staff would also recommend the City Council request the Watershed District to reveiw the feasibility of this plan by determining the ten and twenty-five year flood levels, as well as determining the feasibility of lowering the floodplain elevation. Staff would :also suggest the possibility of using Community Development Block Grants as matching funds with the Watershed District to fund this study. • • The City Council may wish to continue this item to the April 17th meeting prior to taking action on the plan itself in order to hear the Watershed District's recommenda- tion regarding this plan. BL:md • • tCv 6' -- MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission T11RU: Carl Jullic, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: March 22, 1984 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeited Lands Enclosed is a classification list of non conservation land located in the City of Eden Prairie. These parcels forfeited to the State of Minnesota for non-payment payment of real estate taxes. As provided in Minnesota Status 282, the Hennepin County Department of Property Tax- ation requests the City Council to approve these parcels for either public sale or or for private sale to adjacent owners, if the parcels arc unable to he improved because of non compliance with local ordinances. The Council may also acquire par- cels for public use purposes by resolutions stating the use to be made of the parcels. City staff have reviewed these parcels and provide the following information on each parcel: ' PARCEL 14-116-22-34-0043 I F This is a lot located on the north side of Edgewood Court, on the west side of Edenvale Blvd. The northern boundary of this parcel is part of the Edenvale Park j and Open Space System. The eastern boundary is an outlot between Edenvale Blvd. and this parcel. The southern boundary is Edgewood Court. The western boundary is an improved lot. This lot appears to he a buildable lot. The market value of the • lot is $33,000. The assessed value of the lot is $13,200. The delinquent property taxes total $1,481.34. The delinquent assessments total $341.11. City staff recommend this parcel be approved for public sale. PARCEL 04-116-22-34-00047 This lot is located at the southwest corner of Edgewood Court and Edenvale Blvd. The east boundary of this lot is Edenvale Blvd. The north boundary of this lot is Edgewood Court. The west boundary of this lot is Edgewood Court. The southern boundary of this lot is another unimproved lot. This lot appears to be a buildable • lot; however, the soils appear to be marginal for construction. The market value • of this lot is $34,000. TTw assessed value is $13,600. The delinquent taxes total $1,524.16. The assessments due total $311.12. City staff recommend the City acquire this parcel in order to place a bike trail easement on the cast side of the parcel, as an easement will he necessary to construct the bike trail on the west side of Edenvale Blvd. that is being constructed this summer. Staff would recommend that the City return this parcel for public sale after the City has constructed the trail tand defined the easement necessary. C�}� i -2 • - PARCEL 09-116-22-21-0047 This lot is immediately south of the previous lot. Edenvale Blvd. is the eastern boundary. The previous lot is the northern boundary. Edgewood Court is the western boundary. Another undeveloped lot is the southern'boundary. This lot also appears to be a buildable lot; however, the soils appear to be marginal for construction. The market value of this lot is $34,000. The assessed value is $13,600. The de- linquent taxes total $1,524.16. The delinquent assessments total $341.12. Again, -City staff recommend the City acquire this parcel for bike trail easement purposes. After the construction of the hike trail this summer and defining the trail casement necessary, staff would then be reommending returning this parcel for public sale with t the bike trail easement. •PARCE.L 09-116-22-21-0046 This parcel is immediately south of the previous parcel. There is a small outlot between Edenvale Blvd. and this parcel; however, the northern most corner of this lot does abut Edenvale Blvd., and it appears as though a bike trail easement will be necessary over a portion of this lot. The market value of this lot is listed at $34,000. The assessed value is $13,600. The delinquent property taxes total , $1,524.16. The assessments due total $341.12. Again, City staff recommend that the City acquire this parcel for bike trail purposes at this time, and would be recommend- ing returning this parcel for public sale in the future with the bike trail easement. PARCEL 09-116-22-21-0045 This parcel is immediately south of the previous parcel, and is located at the end of the southern most cul-de-sac on Edgewood Court. There-is a house under construe- tion on this parcel at this time. The market value of this lot is $34,000. The assessed value is $13,600. The delinquent property taxes are $1,524.16. The assessments due are $341.12. City staff would recommend notifying the builder that this parcel has forfeited to the State of Minnesota for delinquent taxes and recom- meat that he take steps to re-purchase the property. PARCEL 20-116-22-24-0002 This is a 25 acre parcel located approximately one-half mile west of City Hall and 1,000 ft. north of County Road 1. This parcel is presently being farmed; however, approximately one-fourth of the parcel is a part of a small pond and marsh. The market value of this parcel is $88,300. The assessed value is $16,777. The delin- • quent taxes total $1,562.78. There are no existing special assessments on this property. City staff recommend the City acquire this parcel for park purposes, as - it is fairly centrally located between the railroad tracks, County Road 1, and • County Road 4 and would ensure preservation of the marsh. PARCEL 24-116-22-23-0165 This parcel happens to be a one car garage for apartment member C8, at 8936 Neill Lake Road. The market value of this property is $1,400. The assessed value is $420. The delinquent taxes are $44.96. There arc no assessments on this parcel. ( City staff recommend that this parcel be included on the public sale. -3- PARCEL 21-116-22-22-0001 This parcel is the Pleasant Hill Cemetary located on the north side of County Road 1, east of Pax Christi Church. The City staff surmised that this must be some type of computer error at the County as this is a tax exempt property. City staff will prepare a resolution requesting the County to approve certain parcels for public sale and allowing the City to acquire certain parcels for public use based on your decisions on March 27th. This resolution will be presented at the April 3rd Council meeting. • BL:md • • • • • • • • 6,9 r . . , ; (I) --/21"'"` Ancl,,r5on r-. ii'' ' . • '',$•. ‘;',,'• ' &„•,•,-,,; .1.,..e,- 4,u .,.• 2 . ..., ',..., 4',... •• . .•.','1,:•ly g4, .;,'....\ '....• .,, . . • (t.,I, .,., ,, •, •:.:; ,,,.- • ..•• '- ie'Otit.1.'''' . • ', .;.•• s,'%..l.P.o# .t`. , i - , •,..- ...: • i 71 ..- 1<l/s( t2. L . 1 ... • • • ,., .;•,..., ,,..i • • & ,17, i . .• n . •," .., . • ,"..: ' ..,' ci. . . . . • A• • 1. • ,.. .. •... ., .., cl ,,,-/ , • • .t,. .-I (i) . ,f; zi, . ct'• ,/, .%.1: • ' .: .: .• ...• '• • . i, ‘l't".'' 1 if . ' 00 T„GT G *: .• .1.- ,:-. :•?•.‘k•.,,t'',,3•-• . •!..',4 • .. . , • • • '• ....v.7.‘••••-•'' ''' .. ,t:'.:•'• ".. ' ei t„.:'P. i • • .• • •• . ' . . .•.. • .,... ...;,,N;. :•'::. s . q' .1' , ) ' :/ 1..7.'. •• I . .. . . .. . i. • • . . 4 . f G ... :.1"..... ;:.-' .'........ ., .,'' 1..%).• (11.1)\ _;.. •:..........,)::`. . .9 . ,. . . , c . 0, *. 1 .• . ..... .4 .4-.....; \.- 70Z11-3 -jt •, . .. - ..' :,.- . . .',' .. . ! . • ,.• •,7.::• .,:y.„,21.----; :c •,. oc•I •. . • '.....' •• - •. .' '' . :. . 1 . ' -.:?"' '-'';11.1s iP+i-4 ,eDA., r ••,5` ..1:. .1) 68) N, 0 • :,. . _ • . ..• .... . . •. . . ) . 1— s)'ot-••• -,? ,•,-.,-- ,, ... -ix• :v:\ •& . ,$ ''QS /IVY"': ..„.!.:1- ';',J ' ,-•I, '3.• ‘• ‘.. t' .1) `' •'+41-1 7: '•''06 -' 4,"..',-4.' •''."' .416'` 2 ''')- k,' ?1--•- .../ ..:' * ,1,0''' .L-s .- ‘71.:.4.U..• '.•s • •uicq00, . ... % .., '',' .0 , "3'..4),• ',1', 144; ....••. . . •:.. •. •.: ! •*, :. .!"...:;*(461,„V... .• .:.:.....•:.;*.e,:),:.: 1.11D.-t..."‘a s-.1.„. -.,.. .-t,!. .-.... . ---- , --, ----- -••- •- ••4 14'''..,,,„ .i2t'Cji";"..*.i3. 7,"•'''.- '''''-•4)..... .....s"-'-- .7' 2 " 1-. .3 . , .. . L . --. ‘,C,•.)p,,,k-2,... 4,•-,.* ••••"•, 14- .., •$,, ...-- ---,•1--t••8-.---'---- -SI .• . , ••••;),, D,...-N\-,b,I ..0 'i6 _.14,/ MT.,:,^_:!--\ .,-,,:, 1-, .. ,,,,, .........,,„.---.--------,,,,.....,-. ..; ..... .,.,,,14 (al J. .. -:„ ‘'.. L.%5 inn,,\,(41. $•,5„....- ,, .•; , *el' (81 3-7 00-' •S• • IULi, ar ,v ;?:, N., \--) '. 1%.- 4., d„-- -I-.\,4 ,:r.,, ---, . -. . \--i---- ,,. ,4- • •E), :..-!°::-..11'.:‘-..2... ° - :.-''' 7;.: :. 6,,...:, 1'-:‘, (40 . .,.-0 ••,..,,' ,.n .,. %) 1'1",-.1`f.tr''<: % t. •-• •- ..7.(,-.,-,;()„.- ,, .1...,;.,,705 3(in :•.• . v..-;,. 1, !.. '4 7 .. , ., _1-.;)..I -'0 3..Li e,) <••A, ...1. (,) 2 2 at- :-.... •,: ,: ;;.•t..,, . 11 ,•••••,-.0-...• o 7 I' . • • . ' f5:p9, 8',%, . -. 'I: ' 12-"" 5C;/' 41 of>. ,••.. • , ^• `-?- '.,-f• r--—,‘47,11, <cr • .,'-'t.,: C):,1'.`;56c) , .- <0 . • e'i' .. ‘5143) 8••••,• ,, .6tif '••4- ,,(.•• COU\ ") -:,L.1.1--•/-' 2 •••••..‘ 1 ' *:. A ". 3958 ,5•8 -..' ( , ,• 4.) ,' .•-. •, 60) .!-1-• 6'1 •.:. ' ' .vi.,:?.,le,.6.6, 47, ,,,, ..z.r. .4-:...L. .,'4 Ss.s. ti , •'• ;1 6 1:)° :7 s.:2>''., .;lt !7`.!.7'•: :.:..-.. .'1:'il ..;..k'. V . 4' S.r..":‘'\q:. 041)(1 '''','Pt<.'')1?ilii•'','q0, :' ::•'- -. . (_) \)'''...oc, ' • c 4' "'''* '! HILLEREST - 25:'1 ''''-'''‘..'. ' ," 4' .•.,a $.;,. . e r • • •,.. . .',',,,,,t ., ..l'-•i a• i„1,...,0,;,,,,,,s% • .1 I.' ‘ .7( i-2 ;•.•;',,,-= 1'S..:1'•‘•" .1 ."' ', f -,g,. 3,-.,00 • '''"" 4. - ali i ,,3* tf.v)5 ..' :*• ''',..1.•••• '-;.!..,°r) .,:-. ';. .•si.Jc't:7-- 11.,,..::: .. c 7. t •,:.., ' o-,.;;:,,,.,:;\,,,), 0 4:,.„4,-',/..,,,-;.,. .••. . .0 ,.• II;i-) ::, ....I,- ..;;,- lc)(zZI ;....-',,y : -v.$..I.41,:e ,.:- .• , ') ,• 7 i....• ....'. •i.• „., '0•'S '''•• •.' •'')'''al '' 'N-i -• t"\s" ''‘ Ai!-'•'.. ..:: -' t 0'az:: ,,t,'„ I:,4 zi, •-`-',-,•;.,'. ...• ••: .. ....., 04/ .:• 4.0r3 rf !...:S''.z 1 r41.)5D.P.a - '.4':J...., '' 11;,0...4''),..!•:..V...q.•• •'..... ' • . ."•• s f:', •..“•,. .2, ,,„„, •••f „.ii,e (zo IT‘,5 ,..... . ......c.... ,(c‘i.. 0,,,, . 6:0 .•.: -,'. '..!.* 4 ;. „....:,.:.P, ...,.,:, - • • 0,•.. 7 ,,,., (7,3),, /.....' ,, ttif,".•' , 4. ' ' '' .,. ,,c.r,' •,/,‘'?',,•',,•".‘`;(•;;'-',:.,f\."•'.. -, :, ..'2,1 6,.,1 t•-• • c.'.'4 ,07:$j. ,••••• ,,,•,.•:1.4...il,,;,. .` . '•to '.' • ' i•if 4 F.. •;,.1...,,,,, e. ' .0 .... „.• t • 'i.:•,..,15iu' ,.11 8 iit l,• 9(zi) 4, ii,"' '..."',.')..5.Sbt ,3` . .,',•';'„ ..,.,r t .'11'• ,‘.';•*, ''/..1.,4•,k,ci,;'.;•,':-..;. . i ...,.‘,, sc•• •••••,,. cto) '. A '' )e,,, II!' t65`11.:**,"1.: .21 sli •:,:, •;•0)10 .1 •!•;(.,‘'0'„'i,,)‘;'''''/4...:% '- ,.,r ti. •. ti• ''''''•..• 0: r:•:.•':1C5fyL,.? ''''''':fts) 'i,e- '•,C:4 'r:.,,,•'-'ir;'-ii0 ",• :•''''' . ) 5 • .'i'' '..• "' 1 ,', ?: V.'' ." * -: 3;-• .4.•••• ,,, •' •,!..,f,-0 sr•!,..(iol•\O."'""...,; ... . ••j I ,),,. '• • 'f vs.'`,.; 1 I 0 t••• - - ', .;,.., •: .!,"' ..) e, ' " } NO 4.'7..'• ..- ' • ', .3.•! , :' '1. OUT LOT C "! /556/ -;- ,: -.---t,'v."1:!,',.,''.;.`, ,4, . r 1,:•.\....; 61....,,,....-;;;) . : - .., ,.,..,.....t .11.1 4i *to. •••: ,„ I,../‘il1..-k '. . $ Mil't ..7..- •."" 1 .. 114.;% 7‘ ,o-'• t? .• 1 •. ‘. . . r" . D p) *,-,,:%*" y., • ",,,.:,,/,,: n ii I,(* ••7 ... • • 1.1..04• • 1 . • • . , . ,:, • , . . . ., . <---, 6 t() ,,. . 1 . . . .) . , •. •- Z.:*.\, . .::' . -. ..•,/,N_Li 1, . -::"4 ,/ \ .,:. , .....:. .... ..-... --- '' cii-T . . F ,.,- 4 • -.- .. . m i r c of I'4( - ,:4k2:8,ittd ''-"r n`:•',.,,,.- 1 ,; i .. :' ' ...,• './II". ...1 ,0 ...• •• / g ( . / i•• 1 : . .... •.•• • Criffi,.,.• V,V.1.... '...:.., 1 ' ...... . ...1 . ., .• 11111I , ." ,,... I I . :.,.. . . . ... . . ..... , • . . . . .. .. • Pe'r / i . . Aft i I 1 e'r / : • /11.• . lI Imir — , / • VIM . . a II" . ' II . mei .irrari (-. • . , Ns ,11.1.6 N • . . \,, • - , • ... 110 t.. • . ..) . .. .• . . :. . 0 w•Ma-I tt- . ) „LI i " .. / ,•,-/vil i/ Pi A - '' •.., .(2,. . 4.. . • r!,•''' -.......-----• i i/ IS _motif— I.... ..... ill till iiik..\ r* • sr- •------- ,'..,I i . 11