HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 08/02/1983COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
EDEN PRAIRIE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DAY, AUGUST 2, 1983 7:30 PM, CITY HALL
Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Richard Anderson, George
Bentley, Paul Redpath and George Tangen
City Manager Carl J. Jullie; City Attorney
Roger Pauly; Finance Director John Frane;
Planning Director Chris Enger; Director of
Community Services Robert Lambert; Director
of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording
Secretary Karen Michael
INVOCATION: Councilman Paul Redpath
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA.AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, JULY 5, 1983 Page 1591
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List Page 1604
B. MWCC Permit Application - Edendale Elderly Housing Project (Resolution Page 1605
No. 83-185)
C. Contract Amendment Number 2, Mitchell Road/Technology Drive, I.C. Page 1606
52-010
D. Change Order Number 2, Southwest Leg Prairie Center Drive, I.C. 51-398 Page 1608
E. Set Public Hearing for sanitary sewer easement vacation, Lot 4, Block Page 1610
1, Prairie East Fourth Addition for September 6, 1983
F. Set Public Hearing for easement vacation, Lot 8, Block 1, Edenvale
14th Addition for September 6, 1983
G. Set Public Hearing for easement vacation, Lot 2, Block 3, Creekview
Estates for September 6, 1983
H. .Special assessment agreement between City of Eden Prairie, Mr. & Mrs.
Uherka and Amoco Oil Company regarding Utility Improvements for Shady
Oak Road, I.E. 52-049 (Resolution No. 83-186
I. ARprove plans and specifications for Shady Oak Road Utilities, I.C.
52-049 and authorize bids to be received on August 16, )983 at
10:00 AM (Resolution No. 83-187)
J. Award Contract for County Road 67 Watermain, 1.C. 52-052 (Resolution No. Page 1617
83:rg8)
Page 1611
Page 1616
Pa g e 1639
City Council A g enda - 2 - Tues.,Au g ust 2, 1983
K. 2nd Readin g of OrdinnceNo.34-83 Commercial Stables Ordinance,
I w TOT&rcial Stable r -,- amending CityCode Chapter 11, Section 11.10,
Subdivision 2 by addin g thereto Subpara g raph E which adds Commercial
Stables as permitted uses in certain portions of the Rural District
and Section 11.02, 43, definin g Commercial Stables, redefinin g 11.02,
Item 3, "A g riculture," to permit Commercial Stables, and redefinin g
Item 43, "Stable-Public" to "Stable-Commercial," and amendin g Cit y Code
Chapter 5 b y addin g thereto Section 5.70 relatin g to the licensin g and
re g ulation of Commercial Stables, and adoptin g b y reference Cit y Code
Chapter 1, Section 5.01 throu g h 5.11 and Sections 5.99 and 11.99 which,
amon g other thin g s, contain penalt y provisions.
Pa ge 1496
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. LEN SWEDLUND & REPUBLIC SUPPLY COMPANY. Re q uest for Preliminary
Plat of 14 acres into three (3) lots of approximatel y 4.6 acres for
sin g le famil y detached homes. Location: South of Rile y Lake Road
and east of Carver/Hennepin Count y boundar y . (Resolution No. 83-158 -
Preliminar y Plat) Continued from Jul y 5, 1983
B. JAMES REFRIGERATION. Re q uest for zonin g from Rural to Office for
2.16 acres for an office buildin g . Location: Southwest corner of
Shad y Oak Road and Hi g hwa y 169. (Ordinance No. 31-83 - zonin g )
Continued from Jul y 5, 1983
C. PUBLIC DISTRICT SIGN CODE. (Ordinance No. 37-83, amendin g City Code Pa g e 1621
Section 11.70, Subd. 2., 6., to redefine directional si g ns for churches
and to adopt a definition for directional si g ns for schools and publicl y
owned land or buildin g s ; amendin g Cit y Code Section 11.70, Subd. 3.,
T., to include directional si g ns for schools and publicl y owned land
and buildin g s ; adoptin g Cit y Code Section 11.70, Subd. 4., I., relatin g
to Public District si g ns ; and adoptin g b y reference Cit y Code Chapters
1 and Sections 11.99 which, amon g other thin g s, contain penalt y
provisions)
D. RIDGEWOOD WEST 2ND/WESTOVER b y Centex Corporation. Re q uest for Planned Pa g e 1623
Unit Development District Review for medium densit y clustered sin g le
famil y residential development, zonin g district chan g e from R1-13.5
to R1-9.5 for a medium densit y land use, and preliminar y plat of 18.39
acres for 83 lots. Location: Knollwood Drive, south of Cumberland
Road. (Ordinance No. 38-83 - Zonin g /PUD ; Resolution No. 83-182 -
Preliminary Plat)
Pa g e 1364
& 1620
Pa g e 1374
E. CRC by Ry an Construction. Re q uest for zonin g district chan g e from
Rural to Office for a 21,000 s q uare foot buildin g and preliminary plat
of 1.5 acres for one lot for an office land use. Location: Cit y West
Parkwa y . (Ordinance No. 39-83 - Zonin g; Resolution No. 83-183 -
Preliminary Plat)
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 8754 - 9018
vI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
PETITIONS, nuEsTs & COMMUNICATIONS
A. PERMIT REQUEST from Bill and Claudia Bearman to develop a drivewa y
"steep slope g round."
Pa g e 1632
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,August 2, 1983 .
B. MN-TX. Request for Site Plan Review and Developer's Agreement amendment
75T1TA acres for office/warehouse use. Location: 10301-10379 West Page 1651
70th Street
VIII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 22-83, zoning from Rural to R1-9.5,
Page 1575
R1-13.5 and R1-22, approval of Developer's Agreement for Hidden Glen,
and adoption of Resolution No. 83-167, approving Summary of Ordinance
No. 22-83 and ordering the publication of said Summary for Hidden Glen.
22.8 acres for 59 single family lots south of Townline Road, east of
Highway 101. (Continued from July 19, 1983)
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
B. Report of City Manager
C. Report of City Attorney
D. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Staring Lake Trail Easement
Page 1654
2. Round Lake Parking Expansion
Page 1657
E. Report of Planning Director
F. Report of Director of Public Works
X. NEW BUSINESS
XI. ADJOURNMENT.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JULY 5. 1983
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
730 PM, CITY HALL
Mayor Wolfgang H, Penzel, Richard Anderson, Georg
Bentley, Paul Redpath and George Tangen
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City Attorney Roger
Pauly, Planning Director Chris Enger. Director
of Community Services Robert Lambert, Director
of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, Director of
Public Safety Jack Hacking, and Recording Sec-
retary Karen Michael
INVOCATION: Mayor Wolfgang H, Penzel
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Councilman George Bentley was absent.
I. PRESENTATION OF DONATION FROM EDEN PRAIRIE LION'S CLUB OF $2,500 FOR IMPROVEMENTS
AT-ROUND LAKE
Mayor Penzel introduced Don Breitenstein, President of the Eden Prairie Lion's
Club, and club members Bob Pemberton and Ken Moulder who presented a check for •
$2,500 to the City. This represents the Club's 1983 payment toward the $15,000
committed by the Lions for the installation of playground equipment at Round
Lake Park and for the fishing dock. Penzel thanked the Lion's Club on behalf
of the residents of Eden Prairie for their continued support of City projects,
II. PRESENTATION BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY THEATRE ON THEIR UPCOMING PRODUCTION
OF "CARNIVAL"
Rita Olk, Director of the Eden Prairie Community Theatre, introduced selected
members of the "Carnival" cast who named Mayor Penzel "honorary lion tamer" of
the "Carnival" production. Penzel was presented a chair -- complete with teeth
marks, a whip, and a giant bandage. "Carnival" will be presented the weekends of
July 21 - 23 and 28 - 31.
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following item was added to the Agenda: IX. E. Easement Agreement for the
Edendale Elderly Housing Project.
The following item was removed from the Agenda! IX. B. LEE DATA by Opus Corpor-
ation.
The following item was moved to the Consent Calendar: item VIII. A. to V. W.
Historical & Cultural Commission - Permission to apply for Historical Restoration
Grant under the Emergency Jog Act of 1983.
PA /
City Council Minutes -2- July 5, 1983
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen. to approve the Agenda and Other Items
of Business as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously.
IV. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, JUNE 7. 1983 ,
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to approve the Minutes of the City
Council Meeting held Tuesday, June 7, 1983, as published, Motion carried unani-
mously.
V. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 29-83, Zoning from RM 6.5 4 and Adoption of
Resolution No, 83-160, Approving Summary of Ordinance No, 29-83, and Order-
ing Publication of Said Summary for Gustafson & Associates. Location:
Adjacent to Cardinal Creek Road and west of Stonewood Court.
C. Final Plat approval for Bryant Lake Office Tech Center (Resolution No. 83-155)
D. Final Plat approval for Edenvale 17th (Resolution No, 83-156)
E. Approve Plans and Specifications for Rymarland Camp 3rd Addition, and
authorize bids to be received on July 19. 1983. I.C, 52 043 (Resolution
No. 83-1g)
F. Award contract for north segment of MCA roadway improvements. I.C. 51-308C
Te-Tolution No, 83,148)
G. Contract Amendment No. 1 for Technology Drive Improvements, I.C. 52-010C
H. Approve plans and specifications and order bids to be received on July 28,
1983, for watermain improvements on County Road 67, I,C. 52.052 (Resolution
No. 83-149)
I. Contract Amendment No. 4 for City West Parkway Improvements, I.C. 52-025
J, Change Order No. 8 for City Services Project
K. Receive petition for roadway and utility improvements for street to serve
the easterly end of Bryant Lake Office Center and authorize the preparation
of a feasibility report, I.C. 52-053 (-Resolution No. 83-150)
L. Approve limited use permit for construction of ramps to/from and bridge
over 1-494 - northern segment of MCA roadway project I.C. 51-308C (keso-
lution No. 83-151)
M. Receive letter (petition) for traffic signal at Leona Road/TH 169 and-author-
ize feasibility repot:FIResolution No. 83-152)
N. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 30-83, allowing for interim uses-in-the Major
Center Area
i/c
City Council Minutes .3. July 5, 1983
O. 1st Reading of Ordinance No, 33.83, Deferment of Special Assessments
Tor Senior Citizens and Handicapped Person§,
P. Request from ADI for adoption of Resolution No, 83-161 for Lot 2. Block 1,
Shady Oak Industrial Park 3rd and 6th Additions regarding compliance with
Developer's Agreement
Q. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 28-83, amending City Code Sections 6.02 and
6.03 which relate to the application and scope of Chapters 6, 7 and 8!
amending City Code Section 8.08 which relates to truck parking in resi-
Tential districts; and adopting by reference City Code Chapter 1 and Sections
6.99, 7.99 and 8.99 which, among other things, contain penalty provisions
R. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 21-83, Zoning from Rural to RM 6.5, approval
of Developer's Agreement for Lorence Addition, and Adoption of Resolution
No. 83-139, Approving Summary of Ordinance No. 21-83. and Ordering the
Publication of said Summary for Lorence Addition. 31 condominium units
on 4.725 acres, at Duck Lake Road and Valley View Road.
S. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 20-83, Zoning from C-Regional Commercial to
Office, approval of Developer's Agreement for Bryant Lake Office Tech Center,
7.94 acres for office/service/storage facilities at County Road 60 and Market
Place Drive.
• T. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 14-83, Zoning from RN 6.5 and Rural to R1-9.5,
Approval of Developer's Agreement for Bluffs East, and Adoption of Resolution
No. 83-141, Approving Summary of Ordinance No. 14-83, and Ordering the Publica-
tion of said Summary for Bluffs East. 90 single family detached units, 40
townhouse units and outlots. West of Franlo Road and south of County Road 1.
U. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 24-83, Zoning from Rural to RN 6.5. Approval
of Developer's Agreement for Edenvale 17th Addition, and Adoption of Reso-
lution No. 83,147, Approving Summary of Ordinance No. 24 83, and Ordering .
the Publication of said Summary for Edenvale 17th Addition. 42 duplex'
units located north of Edenvale Boulevard, south of Birch Island Road,
V. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 23.83, Zoning Amendment to approve Revised Site
Plan, and amending PUD District, including variances. to RN 6.5 for 32 town-
house units for Northmark 4th Addition. Located north of Nesbitt Preserve
Park, west of Center Way,
W. Historical & Cultural Commission . permission to apply for Historical Restor-
ation Grant under the Emergency Jobs Act of 1983. - Formerly VIII, A.
MOTION: Redpathaoved, seconded by Anderson, to approve items A • W on the Consent
Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. (Penzel indicated he had intended to vote
"no" on item R because he felt an undesirable precedent would be set but did not
do so because the item would be continued to a time when there would be four"yes #
votes; this would have cause the proponent undue delays with the project.)
City Council Minutes
4- July 5, 1983
VI: PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. LEN SWEDLUND & REPUBLIC SUPPLY COMPANY, Request for Preliminary Plat of
14 acres into three (3) lots of approximately 4,6 acres for single family
detached homes. Location: south of Riley Lake Road and east of the
Carver/Hennepin County boundary. (Resolution No. 83-158 - preliminary plat)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and property owners in the project vicinity had been notified.
Greg Frank, McCombs-Knutson Associates, representing the proponent, addressed
the request. Also present were Len Swedlund and Rita Lukes representing
Republic Supply Co.
Director of Planning Enger stated the Planning Commission had reviewed this
request at it May 23, 1983, meeting and again on June 6, 1983, At the June
6th meeting the Commission voted to recommend approval to the Council on a
vote of 3-2-1. The Planning Staff had recommended denial of the preliminary
plat (see Staff Report of May 20, 1983,)
Director of Community Services Lambert said there was no report from the
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission.
Redpath asked where the lots lines would be in relation to the existing
homestead. Enger said two lots of equal size would not be possible.
Penzel asked if this would be a reasonable variance under the new provision
of the Code. Redpath said he felt the Council should accept the recommendation
of Staff. Tangen said he was in opposition to the plat at the time it came
before the Commission he was on prior to his election to the Council. He said
he felt the proponent was delayed by the action or inaction of the City. He
said he can see both sides of the issue and would favor going with the request
of the proponent at this time. Redpath said he felt Staff should be able to
work with the proponent a while longer on this to come up with the best solu-
tion. Frank noted the complications due to bankruptcy proceedings which resulted ,
in not filing the necessary papers which would have replatted this a year ago.
Penzel noted a letter (attached) from Mrs. Elaine M. Jacques in support of
the request.
There were no comments from the audience.
Jullie stated the Board of Appeals would have to review this proposal as
there are variances which would be necessary whether it were divided into
two or three lots,
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to continue this matter to
the August 2, 1983, meeting and instruct the proponent to work with Staff
with the intent that the number of variances necessary would be reduced.
Motion carried unanimously.
Enger noted this matter was scheduled to be heard by the Board of Appeals
this week. The concensus was the Council would like to hear what the reaction
of the Board was to the variances requested,
)1;0
City Council Minutes .5. July 5, 1983
B. PUBLIC HEARING ON FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR SHADY OAK ROAD UTILITIES, I.C.
52-049 (Resolution No. 83-153)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and notices had been mailed to property owners listed on the preliminary
assessment roll.
Director of Public Works Dietz addressed the feasibility report.
Harland Gregor, Amoco Oil, said they would like to see the project begin
as soon as possible.
Ken Biersdorf, representing the Uherkas, had a question regarding the
deferment of assessments. Dietz said the assessments would come due on
taxes payable in the Spring of 1985. The assessments would be spread over
a 17-year period.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing
and to adopt Resolution No. 83-153, ordering improvements and preparation
of plans and specifications for Shady Oak utilities, Motion carried unani•
mously.
C. JAMES REFRIGERATION. Request for Zoning from Rural to Office for 2,16 acres
for an office building. Location: southwest corner of Shady Oak Road and
Highway 169. (Ordinance No. 31.83 - Zoning)
City Manager Jullie said notice of this Public Hearing was published and
mailed to property owners within the project vicinity.
Charles James, proponent, reviewed the proposal explaining significant
site and design features of the project.
Director of Planning Enger stated this item had been reviewed by the Planning
Commission at its June 6, 1983, meeting at which time it voted (4-2-0) to
recomend approval of the request subject to the recommendations contained
in the Staff Report of June 3, 1983, and according to written materials dated
May 3, 1983, and May 6, 1983, and with the addition of the conditions as
noted in the Minutes of the June 6, 1983, Commission meeting.
This proposal was not reviewed by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
Commission.
Penzel asked about the landscaping of the back driveway. James explained
what was proposed.
Tangen expressed concern about the height of the building and wondered what
buildings would be of comparable size. Enger said this would be a five-story
building comparable to Cabriolle Center (4 stories) and Gelco (5 stories.)
Enger noted that there are 1, 2 and 3 story buildings proposed for City West.
Tangen said he felt a five story building would be out of character for this
area. Penzel said he did not have difficulty with the height of the building;
he felt this was an appropriate location for a building of this type. James
City Council Minutes -6- July 5, 1983
said they had been working on the building proposal for 18 months and had
six architectural firms submit proposals before selecting this one. He
said he feels they have a high quality proposal on an unusual site. He noted
that the floor area ratio of this proposal is below the maximum allowed.
Arrangements have been made with Wooddale Baptist Church whereby their respec-
tive lots can be used for overflow parking. Redpath said he likes the looks
of the building; he feels the aesthetics must be considered. Tangen said
he thought it was a nice looking building but has a problem with the height;
there is nothing around to complement it; the site is not large enough.
Jerry Steelman, 6601 Golden Ridge Drive,, said he is concerned about the
height of the building,
Warren Gerecke, 6622 Golden Ridge Drive, said he would be happier if a
bank were located in this location and the remaining office space were to
be located elsewhere. He felt it was an attractive design but the site is
too compact.
James said he would not object to having the hearing continued to August
2, 1983, so further work might be done to illustrate what other types of
buildings might go on this site. Redpath said he would like to see some
designs of four story buildings with the mechanical equipment on the roof
(the proposed building does not have the mechanical equipment on the roof.)
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to continue the Public Hearing
to August 2, 1983, to allow the proponent additional time to work with Staff
on designs for a building of less than five stories, Motion carried unanimously
D. REMBRANDT RIDGE by Neil A. Lewis and Associates, Request for Zoning from
Rural to R 1-11,5 and Preliminary Plat of 10.4 acres for 19 single family
residential lots. Location: east of 168th Avenue West and south of Chatham
Woods. (Ordinance No. 32-83 - zoning and Resolution No. 83.159 - preliminary
plat.)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Neil Lewis, proponent, spoke to the request.
Planning Director Enger said the Planning Commission had reviewed this
proposal at its June 6, 1983, meeting at which time it voted to recommend
approval subject to the recommendations included in the Staff Report of
June 3, 1983, and additional recommendation that an 8' asphalt hikeway/
bikeway be constructed along the east side of 168th Street from the inter-
section of North Manor Road south to the property line of Rembrandt Ridge
Estates Addition -- to be linked to the existing trail to the south when that
property is developed.
City Council Minutes -7- July 5, 1983
Director of Community Services Lambert noted the Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission had reviewed this proposal at its meeting on June 20,
1983, at which time it voted to recommend approval subject to the conditions
included in the Planning Staff Report of June 3, 1983, and the Supplementary
Staff Report of June 16 J 1983. The Community Services Staff recommended
the addition of a 5' concrete sidewalk along the east side of 169th Street
from the intersection of North Manor Road to the north property line.
Redpath asked if any provision had been made for connecting this area to
the area to the east. Enger said it might be possible to connect this with
the Timber Creek project when that is undertaken.
Penzel asked about the drainage issue. Dietz said the proponent's engineer
is working on resolution of that problem.
Penzel noted a letter of June 28, 1983, from Stephen and Millie Schultz
of 6490 - 168th Avenue West (see attached) expressing their concerns about
the proposal.
Lynn Lysinger, 16756 Whittington Walk, said she would like the Council to
defer action on this proposal until the engineering report regarding the
drainage issue is complete.
Redpath asked how a storm drainage project in this are would be assessed.
Jullie said there would be a public hearing on the project and it would
be assessed in the same manner other public improvement projects are.
Mark Woessner, 16840 North Manor Road, said he was concerned about the
traffic and would like the City to consider ways in which to control the
traffic.
The Council discussed various ways in which drainage assessments might
be assessed whether on an area-wide or neighborhood basis. Discussion
also centered on the amount of traffic on West 168th Street and whether or
not there was a need for additional stop signs at this time,
Lambert stated a tot lot will be developed on the west side of 168th Street
as soon as the City receives the deed to the property. There will be a neigh-
borhood park on Duck Lake Trail with a trail connection to 168th Street,
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing
and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No, 32-83. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to adopt Resolution No. 83-159,
approving the preliminary plat of Rembrandt Ridge Estates for Neil A. Lewis
Associates. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to instruct Staff to draft a
summary resolution noting all the special conditions,,which is to be approved
at the time of 2nd Reading of the Zoning Ordinance; said resolution will
include Commission and Staff recommendations and any amendments thereto;
also to be included is a drainage plan. Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes -8- July 5, 1983
VII. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 8248 - 8486
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to approve the Payment of Claims
Nos. 8248 - 8486. Roll call vote: Anderson, Redpath, Tangen and Penzel voted
"aye." Motion carried unanimously.
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
A. Historical & Cultural Commission - Permission to apply for Historical Resto-
ration Grant under the Emergency Jobs Act of 1983. -- moved to V. W.
IX. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request from Terry Douglas regarding Land Alteration Permit. Location:
north of US 169, west of Eden Prairie Road - Minnesota River Bluffs
Area. (Continued from June 7, 1983)
City Manager Jullie reviewed this request for a land alteration permit.
He called attention to a June 29, 1983, memorandum regarding the Douglas
Driveway/Beverly Drive Extension which was prepared by the Engineering
Department.
Terry Douglas, proponent, noted a letter of June 9, 1983, addressed
to the City Council and City Manager.
Penzel said he was impressed by the Douglas letter which quoted and showed
knowlege of laws but yet showed no knowledge of the Slope Ordinance. Penzel
said he would have liked to know the basis for the need of the road as well
as the criteria Douglas was willing to meet to have the road built. Douglas
said these issues were outlined in a letter of June 9, 1983. Penzel said
he would like to have these issues enumerated so each Council member could
hear the same thing at the same time; so a common understanding might come
about. Douglas said the State contract, allowing access onto TH 169, outlined
what has to be done -- this included grading of the sides, mulching, etc.
Penzel asked if it wouldn't be better if these bluff properties were served
from the north rather than from the bluff's side,
Redpath said he felt it would be wise to improve the easement rather than
to spend money on the bluff's road. He said he has always thought that access
to these bluff properties would come from the north rather than from the
bluff's side. Douglas said one part of the road easement he has drops off
very sharply and would be very costly to fill, He stated, "If the City wants
the property, they can buy the property."
Penzel asked Douglas if he would be willing to commit in writing to abandon
the driveway to TH 169 at the time there is a public road providing access
from the north. Douglas said he would not put that in writing although he
probably would use Beverly Drive, Redpath said that someday there will be
a road through there and in the meantime the bluff is being eroded; he is
not in favor of this. Anderson said he has strong feelings in regard to
preserving the bluffs. Penzel said while he doesn't like the situation, the
parameters placed on the request might make the situation palatable. Tangen
said the bluff cannot be restored so the Council might consider allowing the
driveway with conditions.
161
City Council Minutes -9- July 5, 1983
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the driveway with
the provision that prior to issuance of thg .permit Douglas will agree, in
writing, to the following conditions: the driveway will be hard surfaced,
the shoulders will be restored, and access to TH 169 will be eliminated
once there is public access from the north, Motion carried with Anderson
voting "no."
Douglas said he had a statement to leave with the Council (see attached.)
B. LEE DATA by Opus Corporation. Request for Registered Land Survey of
approximately 0.4 acres to provide secondary access to Lee Data from
West 70th Street. Location: west of West 70th Street adjacent to Lee
Data and Shady Oak Industrial Park 5th Addition. (Resolution No. 83-157 -
Registered Land Survey)
This item was removed from the Agenda at the request of the proponent.
C. TARGET. Request for Site Plan Review for Retail Service Use, Location:
east of Highway 169, north of Prairie Center Drive.
City Manager Jullie stated the Planning Commission had reviewed this request
and had concurred with the recommendations of the Planning Staff Report of
June 24, 1983. He noted the Conmfission had recommended that grading and land
preparation of the site could proceed, but that the proponents return to the
Planning Commission for further review of the site plans, screening and
landscaping plans, prior to Council approval.
Joe Linnaine, Homart Development, Chicago, introduced Phil McCowen, manager
of the Eden Prairie Center, Ed Seikus, project engineer for Homart, Dick
Brooks, regional real estate manager for Target, Bert Schacter, director
of architecture for Target, Mike Moormann, project architect, and Dale
Hamilton, Suburban Engineering, project consultant. Linnaine addressed
the history of the center and what is proposed, Hamilton spoke to the
specifics of the proposal. Schacter discussed two issues which were
raised by the Planning Commission: the design of the rooftop mechanical
equipment and the outside building materials, He asked that these issues
be resolved at another time.
Planning Director Enger restated the Planning Commission had reviewed the
site plan and recommended the City Council approve the site plan so work
might begin on the pad, subject to the recommendations included in the Staff
Report of June 24, 1983.
Redpath said this would be a good addition to the Center and noted that
Homart has been a good neighbor in the community. Tangen concurred and
said he felt the Planning Commission was looking into the right areas
regarding this proposal. Penzel said he wondered about the appropriateness
of a one-story addition to the shopping center; he felt is was at variance
with the nature of the existing center and would prefer something which was
more compatible. Penzel said he hoped the issues raised by the Commission
. I A L)
City Council Minutes -10- July 5, 1983
more compatible. Penzel said he hoped the issues raised by the Planning
Commission could be resolved promptly noting that he had reservations about
committing to something before these issues are resolved. Enger said the
Planning Commission has scheduled a special meeting for July 18, 1983, at
which time it will review the unresolved issues. Redpath felt all measures
would be taken by the developer and the proponent to insure the quality which
the Eden Prairie Center now represents.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to grant approval to go ahead
with preparation of the pad and site alteration based on the concept plan
as submitted by Target. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to direct the Planning Staff and
the Planning Commission to proceed with negotiations with Homart and Target
in the manner in which they have been so doing, Motion carried unanimously.
Schacter said Target is very concerned about presenting a good image and will
work hard to resolve the aesthetics issues.
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Anderson, to continue the meeting beyond the 11:30
p.m. deadline. Motion carried unanimously.
D. SHERATON INN. Request for Amendment to Developer's Agreement.
Ron Krank, architect for the project, addressed the request. Krank was
representing Paul Thomas, developer. He reviewed the proposed modifications
to the design concept.
John Shardlow, Howard Dahlgren and Associates, presented the detailed land-
scape plan and grading proposal.
Penzel said he would like to see the planting area in the center of the
parking lot included in the revised proposal,
Director of Planning Enger noted the change in the landscaping plan is
a major rather than a minor change; the landscaping has been cut by 50%.
He said there were many variances involved with this project; one of the
major elements of the proposal was the landscaping which had been proposed.
Enger suggested the original plan be implemented minus the changes required
by the relocation of parking due to the different configuration of the build-
ing or retaining the original plan along the Glen Road frontage and allowing
the proposed plan along the south and west perimeters. Shardlow compared
the dollar amounts in the landscaping which was proposed and which is in the
revised plan. Krank stated the new plan attempts to entice people to the
building by opening up the sight lines to it from TH 169.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to grant the request for
the amendment to the Developer's Agreement and to work with Director of
Planning Enger on the landscaping plan (plus or minus 25%, to be accomplished
as soon as possible).
City Council Minutes -11- July 5, 1983
Tangen said he would like to see trees added to the parking lot; he said he
felt there would be some value in being ab4e to see a part of the building
from Highway 169. He noted that modification of the landscape plan might
have been too severe along Glen Road and a compromise should be worked out.
He felt a 25% reduction in landscaping materials could be allowed. Krank
said they would not be able to get in the number of trees which they showed
in previous plans. Herb Margolis, project consultant, said the changes came
about as the result of cost considerations. Penzel said the 25% reduction
should only be a general guide.
VOTE ON MOTION: Motion carried unanimously.
E. EASEMENT FOR EDENDALE RETIREMENT CENTER
City Attorney Pauly explained the need for the easement over a private
street so that it will become a public street. This is necessary so the
project can be financed. Planning Director Enger said the church has
some questions regarding the easement and these are being worked out
to their satisfaction.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to authorize Staff to approve
the easement agreement which will be necessary for the Edendale Retirement
Center. Motion carried unanimously.
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
There were no reports.
B. Report of City Manager
1. Goals & Objectives (continued from March 22, 1983)
City Manager Jullie said he will continue to update the Council
as to the Goals and Objectives which were previously discussed
at the March 22nd meeting; these updates will occur as deemed
necessary.
C. Report of City Attorney
City Attorney Pauly noted the Legislature had passed a law which will
shift the need to process gross misdemeanors from the County to Cities.
This change will take place January 1, 1984.
Pauly stated the Hennepin County Court system has been requiring the
attendance of City Attorneys at arraigments which has meant additional
time.
City Council Minutes -12- July 5, 1983
D. Report of Planning Director
1. Transportation Report on TH 212
Director of Planning Enger gave an update as to what has transpired
since the last meeting regarding TH 212, He called attention to a
meeting to be held on July 12, 1983, at which time the Chaska and
Chanhassen City Councils will be joining the Eden Prairie Council to
further discuss the issues involved. Enger noted that District V of
Mn/DOT has requested funds for Highway 5 for a four-lane roadway west
to Highway 41 and for two-lanes on Highway 212 west of Chaska.
XI. NEW BUSINESS
There was none.
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Tangen, to adjourn the meeting at 12:29 a.m.
Motion carried unanimously.
The following items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk
as attachments to the Minutes of the City Council Meeting held
Tuesday, July 5, 1983:
1. Letter of July 5, 1983, from Mrs. Elaine M. Jacques
regarding the Swedlund request.
2. Letter of June 28, 1983, from Stephen & Millie Schultz
regarding the Rembrandt Ridge proposal.
3. Letter of June 29, 1983, from Terrence R. Douglas,
* •
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
August 2, 1983
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.)
Belt Line Construction
Jim Miller
Oakwood Builders, Inc.
Richard Sather
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY)
D & C Construction, Inc.
Gilbertson Construction
Gramstad Homes
Home Crafters, Inc.
Kyllo Development
Meehan Brothers, Inc.
J. R. Nord, Inc.
Starlite Pools
Weathertight Company
White Bear Construction
PLUMBING
Bob's Circle Plumbing
Bohn Plumbing & Heating
Burkhardt Plumbing
Dan the Plumber
Faircon, Inc.
Project Plumbing
Re-Mar Plumbing, Inc.
Wm. F. Fidler Plumbing
.OUTSIDE SEWER & WATER
Maplewood Plumbing & Heating
SOLICITORS
Junior Careers (9)
VENDING
A-Z Rental Center
Twin City Vending
CIGARETTE
Royal Coin
TEMPORARY BEER
Eden Prairie Lions (Corn Feed)
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible
for the li fnsed activity.
I ,
Pat g6li -J, Licensing
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEP,IN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R83 -185
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PERMIT APPLICATION
WHEREAS, the proposed sanitary sewer to be constructed for
Edendale Elderly Housing requires a connection to the Metropolita:
Waste Control Commission (MCC) interceptor system; and
WHEREAS, the proposed connection conforms to the Eden Prairie
Comprehensive Sewer Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council
as follows:
The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed
to submit an application for "Permit for Connection
to or Use of Commission Facilities" to the MWCC.
ADOP1FD by the City Council on August 2, 1983.
Wolfgang H. Pen7e1, Mayor
AllEST: SEAL
John ff. Franc, City Clerk
/Oro
CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 51-010 A-C and E
MITCHELL ROAD AND TECHNOLOGY DRIVE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
JULY, 1983
BENNETT-RINGROSE-WOLSFELD-JARVIS-GARDNER, INC.
2829 University Avenue Southeast
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414
The City has agreed to add the following work to the contract for this project:
SCHEDULE A (I.C. 52-010E)
MITCHELL ROAD
Estimated
Item No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount
1. Muck Excavation
C.Y.
2. Select Granular Borrow
C.Y.
3. F & 1 New Signal Service L.S.
4. Sign Legend Revisions
L.S.
5,950 S 2.50 $14,875.00
1,957 $ 2.60 $ 5,088.20
1 $1,097.80 $ 1,097.80
1 $ 397.00 $ 397.00
TOTAL ADDITIONS SCHEDULE A $21,458.00
SCHEDULE B (I.C. 52-010C)
TECHNOLOGY DRIVE
Estimated
Ilets No. Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount
1. F & I Wire and Conduits
for Lights
2. Install Salvaged Light
Standards w/Base
L .S.
EACH
1 S1,570.80 $ 1,570.80
2 $1,030.00 $ 2,060.00
TOTAL ADDITIONS SCHEDULE B $ 3,630.80
Original Contract Amount
Total Previous Change Orders
Total Additions Contract Amendment #1
Subtotal
Total Deductions Contract Amendment #1
Contract Arount to Dote
Page 1 of 2
$1,571,081.05
8,500.00
$ 25,088.80
$1,604,669.85
$1,604,669.85
/60(0
'ENGINEER:
Bennett-Ringrose-Wolsfeld- arvis-Gardner, Inc.
Title
A5 ,-.4,76 Ac4cei 21,4a“..G 7 al
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
City Engineer
Date
Page 2 of 2
160')
Date
Location of Work _ _
The above itemized work is located on Mitchell Road and Technology
D
r
i
v
e
.
•
Description and Necessity for Amendment
Schedule A (Additions)
Items 1 and 2 - Muck was encountered on Mitchell Road that was not
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
b
y
soil borinas during design. Select granular backfill was required
t
o
b
a
c
k
f
i
l
l
the muck excavation below water level.
Item 3 - Relocation of the NSP power line from the west side of Mi
t
c
h
e
l
l
R
o
a
d
t
o
the cast side required relocation of the signal service pole and a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
wiring from the west to the cast side of the roadway. The propose
d
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
of the power line was not known prior to bidding.
Item 4 - The addition of words on the public safety directional sign
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
a
n
increased panel size. All three directional signs were increased in
s
i
z
e
a
c
c
o
r
-
dingly for symmetry.
Schedule B (Additions)
Items 1 and 2 - MTS requested the installation of two additional sal
v
a
g
e
d
l
i
g
h
t
standards at their easterly entrance.
CONTRAC1OR:
Progressive Contracting, Inc. c r,
Title • Date
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
JULY 7, 1983
PROJECT: Schooner Boulevard Southwest Leg
1.C. 51-398
SAP 181-111-03
RCM 821022
TO: Northdale Construction Company, Inc.
You are hereby directed to make the following changes to your contract for
the above referenced project.
NATURE OF THE CHANGE:
1. Perforated .Pipe .prain Tile: Construct a perforated pipe drain tile system
at the intersection of Schooner Boulevard and West 78th Street in accordance
with the drawings and details accompanying this change order.
2. Sequence of Operations: Revise the sequence of operations to emphasize
substantial completion of Schooner Boulevard from Station 57+50 to 99+75
and West 78th Street from Station 0+00 to 9+00. The requirement to sub-
stantially complete the Trunk Highway 5 intersection construction from
Station 49+60 to 52+00 is revised from July 1, )983 to July 1, 1984 with
the exception that revisions at the intersection to accomodate the
relocation of the traffic signals under I.C. 51•340A shall be coordinated
with the contractor for this work. The date for substantial completion of
Schooner Boulevard from Station 79+00 to 99415 shall be revised to
August 8, 1983.
This revision will require mobilization of dewatering systems for Utility
installation in West 78th Street. independent of utility dev,atering for
utility installation in Schooner Boulevard from the T.H. 5 intersection to
the West 78th Street intersection. This revision will accomodate the
placement of bituminous base and wear on Schooner Boulevard from Station
56+70 to 79+00 in the 1983 construction season.
JUSTIFICATION:
1. Perforated Pipe Drain Tile: Perched groundwater from the property in the
southwest quadrant of Schooner Boulevard and West 78th Street appears to
supply springs which have developed along the northbound lands of Schooner
Boulevard. Water from springs continuously saturates the subgrade of the
northbound lanes and reduces subgrade stability. The drain tile is designed
to intercept groundwater from this source.
2. Sequence of Operations: The sequence of operations is revised to coordinate
W.ith -the -Oanned closure of the intersection of West 78th Street with
T.H. 169 by rmDOT as part of improvements now under contract in this area.
The proposed changes are designed to provide the best access for industries
on West 78th Street during the construction proposed by MOOT at T.H. 169.
THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTED:
NORTHDALE CONS1RUCTION COMPANY, INC.
• r
By
Change Order No. 2
Schooner Boulevard Southwest Leg
Page 2
ADJUSTMENTS 10 CONTRACT QUANTITIES:
1, Perforated Pipe Drain Tile
Add 6" perforated pipe with aggregate
and filter fabric 800 LF @16.50 = $13,200.00
Add 7 cleanouts 7 Ea @ 175.00 = . 1,225,00
Subtotal Perforated Pipe Drain $14,425.00
2. Sequence of Operations
Add additional dewatering LS $ 4,500.00
Deduct for Bituminous Mixture
Sta 57450 to 79+00 on Schooner
and 0+00 to 9+00 on West 78th .
placed in 1983
Subtotal Sequence of Operations
.TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
SUMARY OF ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT AMOUNT:
4400 T @ 0.50 = (2,200,00)
$ 2,300.00
Add $16,725.00
Contract Amount Prior to this Chance Order
Increase Resulting from this Change Order
Revised Contract Amount Including this Change Order
$2,483,771.95
$-2,500,496.95
THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE APPROVED:
RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATES, 1NC.
Ze.'2"")
Date _ .
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
By
Date
Date
/09
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
DATE: July 27, 1983
RE: Easement Vacations
The August 2, 1983, agenda contains requests to set three public hearings
for the purpose of vacating easements on three unassociated parcels. The
first request is to vacate a sanitary sewer easement in the Prairie East 4th
Addition which presently has a home constructed on it. The surveyor for the
home builder made an error in the location of the sanitary sewer on the site
plan. The result was that the sanitary sewer was relocated at the surveyor's
expense and a new easement created. However, the old easement must be vacated
to provide a clean title for the home site.
The second and third requests are similar in nature in that the buyers of the
respective lots found that the lots were not large enough to accommodate the
proposed home construction. In both of these situations, the owners will be
replatting two adjacent lots to create a larger lot for their needs. The
easements to be vacated occur along the old property line and once again the
vacations are necessary to provide for a clean title for the lots.
EAD:sg
TO: Mayor and Members of City Council
THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
DATE: July 27, 1983
RE: Special Assessment Agreement between City of Eden Prairie/
Uherkas/Amoco -;
As discussed at the public hearing for the feasibility report regarding
utilities along Shady Oak Road (I.C. 52-049), a special assessment agree
m
e
n
t
hasbeen prepared which specifies the method of distributing the cost fo
r
the improvements. The Council package includes an unsigned copy of thi
s
agreement as prepared by our City Attorney's office. Since the princip
l
e
s
regarding the agreement were quite well defined, I do not anticipate an
y
particular problem in getting the agreement executed by the other partie
s
.
Therefore, I would request that the agreement be approved and that the
Mayor and Manager be authorized to execute the document. If we have an
y
difficulties in getting the other parties to sign, I will report back a
t
a later date.
EAD:sg
August 2, 1983
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION R83-186
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
SHADY OAK ROAD UTILITIES
I.C. 52-049
WHEREAS, the City Of Eden Prairie conducted a public hearing on
July 5, 1983, to determine the feasibility of constructing utilities to
serve properties in the vicinity of Shady Oak Road and 62nd Street;
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie determined that the project was
feasible and ordered the preparation of plans and specifications;
• WHEREAS, City Staff was directed to prepare an assessment agreement
regarding the distribution of costs for the project as recommended in the
feasibility report; and
WHEREAS, Eden Prairie City Council has reviewed the special assessment
agreement and finds it to be consistent with the recommendations of the
feasibility report.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council
that said special assessment agreement is hereby approved and that the Mayor and
City Manager are authorized to execute said document on behalf of the City of
Eden Prairie.
ADOPTED by the City Council on August 2, 1983.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, City Clerk
1(0 I 2,
AGREEMENT REGARDING
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
This is an agreement made this day of
19 , among the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal
corporation (the "City"), Leonard F. Uherka and Bessie V. Uherka,
husband and wife, and Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland corporation,
collectively referred to as the "Owners".
A. The Owners are each the owner of certain real property
situated in the City of Eden Prairie, County of Hennepin, State
of Minnesota. The property which is subject to this agreement
(the "property") and the interest of each of the Owners and
Mortgagees is described on Exhibit "A" hereto and is hereby made
a part hereof.
B. The Owners petitioned the City, on February 18, 1983, for
•
certain improvements which will serve the property.
C. The City, on July 5, 1983, by Resolution 83-153, ordered
construction of public improvements adjacent to and over portions
of the property. The improvements are the construction and
installation of sanitary sewer, watermain, trunk sewer and water,
and for restoration. The project is identified as I.C. 52-049,
Shady Oak Utilities.
D. The improvements will be constructed by the Fall of 1983, and
the City intends to levy special assessments therefore in the Fall
of 1984. Attached as Exhibit "B" is the Preliminary Assessment R
o
l
l
which was before the City Council at its meeting held July 5, 1983
.
The assessments will be levied in accordance with Method 2, assess
i
n
g
'
35% of the cost to Amoco and 65% of the cost to Uherkas.
AGREEMENTS
IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows:
I.. The Owners consent to the levying of the assessments referred
to in Paragraph D, presently estimated as shown on Exhibit "Ir..
16 13
2. The Owners waive notice of the hearin
g
t
o
b
e
h
e
l
d
at which hearing the assessments were
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Council, and thereafter approved "and l
e
v
i
e
d
.
3. Amoco Oil Company concurs that the ben
e
f
i
t
t
o
i
t
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
b
y
virtue of the improvements ordered by
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
e
x
c
e
e
d
the amount of the assessment to be lev
i
e
d
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
4. The Uherkas concur that the benefit to
t
h
e
i
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
b
y
v
i
r
t
u
e
of the improvements ordered by,the Cit
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
e
x
c
e
e
d
t
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
of the assessments to be levied agains
t
t
h
a
t
p
a
r
c
e
l
.
S. The Owners waive all rights they h
a
v
e
b
y
v
i
r
t
u
e
o
f
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
Statutes Section 429.081 or otherwise
t
o
c
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
t
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
or validity of the assessments, or the
p
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
u
s
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
City in levying the assessments and he
r
e
b
y
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
,
its officers, its agents and employees
,
f
r
o
m
a
n
y
a
n
d
a
l
l
liability related to or arising out of
t
h
e
levying of the
assessments:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
c
a
u
s
e
d
t
h
i
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
to be executed as of the day and year
f
i
r
s
t
s
t
a
t
e
d
.
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
By
Its
By
Its
Leonard F. Uherka
Bessie V. Uherka
STATE OF MINNESOTA '
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowled
g
e
d
b
e
f
o
r
e
m
e
t
h
i
s
day of , 19 , by B7--
Amoco Oil Company a Minnesota corporat
i
o
n
,
o
n
b
e
h
a
l
f
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowled
g
e
d
b
e
f
o
r
e
me this _
day of , 19 , by and
/6,14
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
a municipal corporation
By
Wolfgang Penzel
Its Mayor
By
Carl J. Jullie
Its City Manager
STATE or MINNESOTA
COUNTY or HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of , 19 , by of
urci of Eden Prairie a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf
of the corporation.
Notary Public
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 83-187
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications
for the following improvements to wit:
I.C. 52-049, Shady Oak Utilities
and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file
for public inspection in the City Engineer's office.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in
the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an
advertisement for bids upon the making of such imprcvement
under such approved plans and specifications. The adver-
tiser,ent shall be published for 2 week(s), shall specify
the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be opened
at 10:00 o'clock A.M. on Tuesday, August 16, 1983, and
considered by the Council at 7:30 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday,
August 16, 1983, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall,
and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and
filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit,
cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to
the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid.
ADOPTED by the Edeh Prairie City Council on August 2, 1983.
Wolfgang- -—re Wel—, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
'CH
rieke
carton
miler
ssociates, inc.
k .chiteds
engineers
landscape architects
and surveyors
laboratory services
1011 l'ost street south
pest offtce box 130
h.yions, minnesota 55343
612-935-G901
July 28, 1983
Eugene A. Dietz, P.E.
Director of Public Works
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
RE: BIDS ON IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 52-052
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
COUNTY ROAD 67 WEST OF INDUSTRIAL BLVD.
RCM PROJECT 831023
Dear Mr. Dietz:
Bids on the above project were taken on My 28, 1983 at
10:00 A.M. The low bid for the project was submitted by
F. F. Jedlicki, Inc. in the amount of $24,873.50. This
is approximately eight percent higher than the estimated
construction cost of $23,000.00. A summary of the four
bids received is attached.
The low bidder is a reputable contractor which has previ
o
u
s
l
y
done work in the Twin City area. We therefore recommend
awarding the project to F. F. Jedlicki, Inc.
Very truly yours,
Oa ,
Nancy J. Ner -
RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATES, INC.
NJH:ca
Enclosure
SUMMARY OF BIDS
LC. 52-052
DESCRIPTION: Watermain Improvements on County Road 67
BIDS OPENED: July 28, 1983
CONSULTING ENGINEER:
Rieke Carroll Muller Associates, Inc.
CHECKED BY:
BIDDER • BID SECURITY TOTAL AMOUNT
F. F. Jedlicki, Inc.
5%
$24,873.50
28,779.25
T. S. Excavating, Inc.
Widmer Brothers, Inc.
5%
5%
29,115.00
G. L. Contracting, Inc. 5%
29,342.50
The undersigned recommend award of Contract to:
F. F. Jedlicki, Inc.
as the lowest responsible bidder for this Improvement Contrast
r (7\
Consulting Engineer Eugene A. Dietz, P.E.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
t
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 83-188
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following
improvements:
I.C. 52-052 Watermain Improvements on County Road 67
bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received are
shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends award of contract to
F. F. Jedlicki, Inc.
as the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as
follows:
The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter
into a contract with F. F. Jedlicki , Inc.
in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of $24,873.50
in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the
Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 2, 1983
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL:
John D. Franc, Clerk
C
Variance II 83-18
ZUNING .BONPD OF APPEALS AND
. ; ADJUSTMENTS
AE: Petition o f Republic Supply Company & Leonard Swedlund
Location 9000 Biley_Lake Road
The Board of Appeals and Adjustments for the City of Eden Prairie at a
tegular (special) meeting thereof duly considered the above petition and
after hearing and examining all of the evidence presented and the file
therein does hereby find and order as follows: • •
1. All procedural requirements necensary for the granting of
said variance have been met. (YES_ x NO ).
2. There are circumstances unique to the property under conside-
ration, and granting such variance does not violate the spirit
- and intent of the City's Zoning ana platting Ordinances.
(YEs X O .
3. Variance Request #83-18 is herein Granted X ,Denied
for lot size and setback variances.
4.. Conditions to the granting X , Denial of said variance
are as follows:
1) This variance'request must be exercised within one year.
2) This variance is subject to City Council reviewal.
5. This variance shall be revoked within 15 days after notice of
failure to meet the required conditions has been given.
6. A copy of this order shall he forwarded to the applicant by the
City Clerk.
7. This order shall be effective July_14,_1983:how.!ver, this
'variance s1611 lapse and to of ho eifect wiless the erection or
alterations permitted shall ot.cur within one (1) year of the
effective date unless sail :Hod of time is extended pursuant
to the appropriate piovedtires prior to the expiration of one
year from the effective iitte hvreof.
BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS
/64 _0 DY 4..
i913. .
ORDINANCE NO. 37-83
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA,- AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION
11.70, SUBD. 2., 6., TO REDEFINE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS FOR CHURCHES AND TO ADOPT A
DEFINITION FOR DIRECTIONAL SIGNS FOR SCHOOLS AND PUBLICLY OWNED LAND OR BUILDINGS;
AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 11.70, SUBD. 3., T., TO INCLUDE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS FOR
SCHOOLS AND PUBLICLY OWNED LAND AND BUILDINGS; ADOPTING CITY CODE SECTION 11.70,
SUBD. 4., I., RELATING TO PUBLIC DISTRICT SIGNS; AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE
CHAPTERS 1 AND SECTIONS 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. City Code Section 11.76, Subd. 2., 6., shall be and is
amended to read as follows:
Section 11.70, Subd. 2.,
6. Directional signs for churches, schools, or publicly owned land or
buildings--A sign which bears the address and/or name of a church, school, or
publicly owned land or building and a directional arrow pointing to said location.
Section 2. City Code Section 11.70, Subd. 3., T., shall be and is
amended to read as follows:
Section 11.70, Subd., 3.,
T. Directional signs for churches, schools, or publicly owned land or
buildings shall be allowed as permitted by Subdivision 4.
Section 3. City Code Section 11.70, Subd. 4., I., shall be and is
adopted to read as follows:
1. Wall signs: One sign per building not to exceed 24 square feet in
area. Where a building has one or more street frontages, one sign may be located on
each wall facing a street provided one does not exceed 24 square feet and the others
do not exceed 18 square feet. All wall signs shall be uniform in design. Religious
symbols shall not be considered part of the wall sign area.
• 2. Free-standing signs:
a. One free-standing sign for each building, lot, parcel, or
tract of land may be erected on the lot, parcel, or tract of land it applies or on
which any such building is situated. The maximum height of a free-standing sign
shall be eight (8) feet and its total area shall not exceed eighty (80) square feet.
Religious symbols shall not be considered part of the free-standing sign area.
Where a buildtnj has two or more street frontages, only one
free-standinq siqn of the above size shall be permitted and one additional
free-standing si aa shall be permitted not to exceed 35 square feet in size.
b. Off-site directional signs: Two additional church, school,
or publicly owned land or buildings directional signs shall be permitted in
locations other than the lot, parcel, or tract of land which it applies. Said signs
shall be erected on non-public land, or if the sign is one owned by a public body
such directional sign may be erected upon public owned property provided:
1. The maximum size of the sign shall not exceed three
(3) square feet.
2. The owner's permission must be obtained.
3. The sign shall be a minimum height of four (4) feet,
maximum height of six (6) feet.
4. Signs shall be uniform in design.
3. The signage program will be reviewed by the Director of
Planning.
' 4. Temporary special event signs shall be permitted for a period not to
exceed ten (101days. Such signs shall be no higher than eight (8) feet and not
larger than I? Euare feet.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
.Section 5.01 through 5.11, Section 5.99 and Section 11.99, are hereby adopted in
their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the day of , 1983, and finally read and adopted
and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the
day of , 1983.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the
day of
, 1983.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #83-182
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF RIDGEWOOD WEST 2ND ADDITION FOR CENTEX CORPORATION
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Ridgewood West 2nd Addition for Centex Corporation,
dated July 1, 1983, of 18.39 acres for 83 single family' residential lots, a copy of
which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions
of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is
herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City. Council on the
, 1983.
day of
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
1
Planning Commission Minutes 2 July 11, 1983
MEMBERS REPORTS
None.
IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
A. RIDGEWOOD WEST 2ND/WESTOVER, by Centex Corporation. Request
for Planned Unit Dever6Tment District Review for Medium
Density clustered single family residential development,
Zoning District Change from R1-13.5 to R1-9.5 for a medium
density land use, and Preliminary Plat of 18.39 acres for 83
lots. Location: Knollwood Drive, South of Cumberland Road.
A public hearing.
Tim Eller, Centex, reviewed the proposal with the Commission,
pointing out the features of the site and how the lot configurations
were designed to work within the site constraints. Mr. Eller also
noted the location of the totlot and the scenic easement along
Purgatory Creek, which would be dedicated to the City.
Regarding the proposed landscaping, Mr. Eller stated that the trees
proposed within the courtyard areas would be 3-4 inch caliper
deciduous and 10-15 foot high evergreens. Privacy fencing was also
to be placed at the periphery of the yards of each courtyard unit.
Chairman Bearman asked if additional trees would be preferable to
privacy fencing. Mr. Eller stated that the type of fencing that was
used in the previous phase had been successful, and that, in terms
of price, the two types of methods for creating privacy were nearly
equal. He added that the fencing to be placed on each lot as shown
in the plans would be maintained and controlled by the homeowners'
association.
Planner Enger stated that the plans included. a great deal of
architectural control, which appeared to be one of the reasons for
success of the first phase. He pointed out that one of the concerns
in the previous phase was that of adequate parking within the
development. This plan showed driveways wide enough for double car
garages, with enough room for two cars to park outside of the
garage. In addition, all streets were designed to be 32 ft. in
width, an additional four feet beyond the standard 28 ft. of normal
residential single family subdivisions. Parking of cars would be
allowed along one side of the streets for overflow purposes.
Sidewalks were proposed along all street frontages as well.
Planner Enger stated that the homes were not all courtyard homes,
but that future buyers had the opportunity to purchase courtyard
lots, lots along the looped streets, average sized single family
lots, and small sized single family lots. The types of lots
available in the development suited a variety of needs for a variety
of families in the market place.
Mr. Eller stated that there were several styles of homes available
with two elevations each. No two similar elevations would be
•• ia(1
Planning Commission Minutes 3 July 11, 1983
allowed within one courtyard, nor would either of the two variati
o
n
s
of elevations of any one unit type be allowed to be next to e
a
c
h
other. In addition, there were six siding colors available, w
i
t
h
15-16 types of trim for each unit.
Torjesen asked if the adjacent and surrounding road system
w
a
s
adequate to handle the traffic projected from this development. M
r
.
Eller responded that Cumberland had been built to Mitchell Road wi
t
h
the first phase. There had been concern about Anderson La
k
e
s
Parkway with the first phase, as well. Approximately 300 f
t
.
existed between Anderson Lake Parkway as it currently existed
t
o
access this property. It would have to be built across t
h
e
adjacent owner's property.
Torjesen questioned whether Staff was comfortable with the ro
a
d
network in terms of capacity, given the volume of traffic to
b
e
generated from this residential development. Staff responded tha
t
study had shown that the road network was adequate to service th
e
first phase and this phase of the development. Additional phas
e
s
would not be allowed until the connection of Anderson Lakes Parkw
a
y
was completed. Staff stated that the connection was intended to b
e
under construction within the next couple of years, based on Cit
y
plans.
Torjesen inquired as to the exact nature of the variances requeste
d
for the project. Staff responded that the variances were requeste
d
for the courtyard lots and looped road lots with respect t
o
setbacks, lots sizes, etc. Mr. Dick Krier, Westwood Planning
Engineering, representing proponent, stated that all lots on public
road frontages could meet the minimum ordinance requirements if th
e
Commission required it.
Torjesen questioned the justification for the variances. Mr. Elle
r
stated that the Planned Unit Development Concept for this entire
project had been adopted as presented with this 'project phase.
H
e
pointed out that the two changes to the approved concept p
l
a
n
included the change from cul-de-sacs to looped configurations
f
o
r
two roads and the fact that two lots "shifted" phases. Torje
s
e
n
stated that he felt that was adequate justification for
t
h
e
variances requested.
Johannes asked if there had been a change from the total number
o
f
units approved originally with the Planned Unit Development Concep
t
.
Mr. Eller responded that two units had "shifted" phases. This ph
a
s
e
picked up two units, while a subsequent phase would have two le
s
s
units due to alignments necessitated by soils conditions. The n
e
t
total was the same, however.
Torjesen asked if the assumption was made that this was an approve
d
Planned Unit Development whether the underlying zoning of R1-9.5 w
a
s
appropriate. Staff responded that the unit type was detached singl
e
family residential, not attached, which would be represented
b
y
single family residential zoning districts.
Planning Commission Minutes 4 July 11, 1983
Johannes inquired whether the some proportion of trees would be used
in landscaping the lots on the private looped roads as was proposed
for the courtyard lots. Mr. Eller stated that the same proportion
would be used.
Mr. Eller pointed out that the total amounts of fencing and
shrubbery shown at the model homes location was not representative
of everything provided by the association for the development.
Additional fencing and shrubbery were added at the model location to
provide visual examples of what people could do with their homes,
should they so choose. However, the landscaping and fencing shown
on the plans was to be installed in the locations shown.
Johannes inquired as to the timing of the upgrading of Mitchell
Road. Staff responded .that Council had directed that a study be
prepared on the feasibility of extension of the road. Upon
completion of the feasibility study, more detailed information would
be available as to the timing of the upgrading of the road.
Chairman Bearman asked if the road system within the project would
be connected to Anderson Lakes Parkway when it was completed. Staff
stated that it was a requirement of the Planned Unit Development for
this project that prior to. construction of the next, or third,
phase, the roads would be connected to Anderson Lakes Parkway.
Chairman Beaman asked for comments and questions from members of
the audience. There were none.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Johannes, to close the
public hearing.
Motion carried--5-0-1 (Marhula abstained)
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Schuck,to recommend to the
City Council approval of the request of Centex Corporation for
Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning from R1-13.5 to
R1-9.5 for clustered single family residential development, based on
written materials and plans dated July 1, 1983, and subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 8, 1983, with the
addition of condition #10 to read: "Lots along the east side of the
public street frontage of Knollwood Drive shall meet all
requirements of the R1-9.5 zoning district, if they are not part of
a courtyard or looped street lot configuration."
M_OTION TO AMEND was made by Johannes, seconded by Torjesen, to
delete condition #10.
In discussion of the amendment Torjesen stated that he felt it
should be clear that this developer had justified the variances
requested for the lots within this project. He stated that he felt
1(paci,
Planning Commission Minutes
July 11, 1983
it was important that any developer be able to do so before the City
could grant variances for any reason.
Motion to Amend carried--4-1-1 (Gartner against; Marhula abstained)
The Commission then voted on the main motion, as amended.
Motion carried--5-0-1 (Marhula abstained)
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Johannes, to recommend to
the City Council approval of the request of Centex Corporation for
Preliminary Plat of 18.39 acre for 83 lots for medium density
residential land use, based on written materials and plans dated
July 1, 1983, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report
dated July 8, 1983.
Motion carried--5-0-1 (Marhula abstained)
MF '!ilvA •ThIrt
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
TURU: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Bob lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: July 14, 1983
SUBJECT: Supplementary Report to the Planning Staff Report on Ridgewood
West/Westover
'Upon review of the Ridgewood West 2nd/Westover Addition, Community Services Staff
provide the following information for Commission and Council review:
1. The Planning Staff Report did not specifically state that the park
totlot located at Knollwood Drive and -rine Bluff Court will be a
homeowner owned and maintained totlot that is designed and constructed-
to-City standards.
2. The Planning Staff Report refers to sidewalks along Cumberland Road,
Hawthorne Drive and Knollwood Drive, but does not state a specific
width. The plans submitted by Centex homes depicts a 4' wide sidewalk
on both sides of Cumberland Road and 6' bituminous pathways along
Knollwood Drive and Hawthorne Drive. The Com1A,nity Services Staff
recommend 5' wide cowrete sidewalks on both sides of Cumberland
Road and 5' wide concrete sidcualks in the locations of the 6'
bituninous walkway depicted on the plan adjacent to Knollwood Drive
and Hawthorne Drive.
3. The Community Services Staff :,ecotImend dedication of the southern
portion of Lot 31 and Lot 32, Block 4 that would allow development of
a public trail along the Purgatory Creek corridor. This piece of
property is required for recess to this proposed trail corridor. The
property required is a line beginning at the southwest corner of Lot
11, running northeasterly to a point along Lot 12 eastern property line
that dissects the 534 contour.
Mt Community Services Staff reco!rwmcis approval of Ridgewood West 2nd/Westover
25 per the July 8 Planning Staff Report with the previously stated changes and
additions.
BL:md
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
Planning Commission
Stephen Sullivan, Assistant Planner
• Chris Enger, Director of Planning
July 8, 1983
Ridgewood West 2nd/Westover
Cumberland Road and Knollwood Drive
0
APPLICANT &
FEE OWNER:Centex Corporation
REQUESTS: 1. Planned Unit Development District Review for a medium
density, clustered, single family land use
2. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 for a medium
density land use
3. Preliminary plat of 18.39 acres for 84 lots
Background
This project is part of the original 1978 approval of the Ridgewood West single
family subdivision of 176 lots. Centex opted for single family subdivision,
although it was a change from the Red Rock Sector Plan, which designated this area
for five to ten units per acre. Since the Ridgewood West project, Ridgewood West
2nd Addition has been approve. This approval included:
Comprehensive Guide Plan change from Low Density Residential to Medium
Density Residential for approximately 64 acres
Planned Unit Development Concept approval for 168 small lot single family
detached units, and 168 condominium units
Preliminary platting of 57 single family lots for 1st phase construction
Variances from R1-13.5 zone to include:
1. Minimum lot size
2. Minimum lot width and depth
3. Maximum density from 2 units/acre to 3.37 units/acre
4. Front, side, and rear yard setbacks
5. Lot frontage not on a public street
Approval of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet
Centex's philosophy of clustered homes and single family detached homes on smaller
lots is characterized by several design components:
• I (;k9
Ridgewood West 2nd/Westover 2 July 8, 1983
1. Each home is specifically placed on each site, promoting privacy and
encouraging planned views from the unit.
2. Architectural controls are established, providing for a variety of
facades, styles, and floor plans, yet maintaining a design
consistency throughout the development.
3. Complimentary landscape design for the entire project is
accomplished by planting large trees, shrubs, and sod on each lot.
This will provide a consistent, established look to the development.
Also, due to the small lot size and closeness of units, privacy
fences are strategically located between each lot.
4. A homeowners' association will be established.
The proposed project maintains the developmental design components previously
. approved with several minor revisions. In lieu of two cul-de-sacs, the proposal
utilizes a private loop road on the east and west sides of Knollwood Drive. The
addition of the loop road, in combination with the cluster groupings and the single
family detached lots provides variety to the development. As well, an array of lot
sizes are provided. Large lots are placed along Purgatory Creek. Medium and
smaller lots are intermixed along the loop roads and clustered areas. The average
lot size for the development is 9,500 sq. ft. The number of units is changed from
82 to 84. The number of cluster home groupings is revised from twelve to eight.
The units will have one and two car garages. Additional parking will be provided
within the public roads and stalls have been placed off the private loop roads.
The site and roads are currently rough graded. Minor changes reflecting the limited
street revisions and building pad adjustments will be necessary. Hawthorne Drive
will maintain a 32 ft. width. The proposal revises the width of Knollwood Drive
from 28 ft. to 32 ft. A sidewalk was previously approved along Cumberland.
Additional sidewalks along Hawthorne Drive and Knollwood Drive are proposed.
The utility plan remains basically as approved with changes reflecting the addition
of the loop roads and revisions of lot layout within several clusters. Sanitary
sewer lies within the road right-of-way, then runs east along a property line, tying
to the Metro Interceptor adjacent to Purgatory Creek. Storm sewer will be similar
to the previous plan, with drainage ending in Purgatory Creek, also. Watermain will
tie to a main located off Cumberland Road and will eventually loop back to Anderson
Lakes Parkway. Sanitary sewer and water service will be provided to the clusters
and loop roads via an easement for utilities, allowing connections for service.
As provided under the original proposal, a scenic easement is to be placed along
Purgatory Creek and Research Road as approved.
A totlot is proposed at the intersection of Knollwood Drive and Pine Bluff Court.
RICOMMFNDATIONS
Staff recommends approval for Planned Unit Development District Review, with
variances, zoning from Rural to R1-9.5, and preliminary plat of 18.39 acres, subject
to proponent meeting the following conditions:
1 20
Ridgewood West 2nd/Westover 3 July 8, 1983
1. The project shall maintain the setback requirements per the Ridgewood West
3rd PUD Plan dated July 1, 1983. Setbacks off Cumberland Road shall be no
less than 30 ft.
2. No unit adjacent to, directly across, nor diagonally across from another
shall be of the same type or facade.
3. Concrete sidewalks shall be construted as each associated cluster is
finished.
4. The proposed totlot and adjacent neighborhood park shall be constructed per
the previous agreement by October 1, 1983.
The scenic easement along Purgatory Creek and Research Road shall be granted
to the City with the final plat.
6. The proposed project will maintain the previously approved development
restrictions for architectural control, landscaping for each unit,
ornamental street lighting, consolidation of addresses and mailboxes,
privacy fencing, and the homeowners' association.
7. The proponent shall meet with the Engineering Department regarding water,
sanitary, and storm sewer prior to final plat.
8. The proponent shall receive Watershed District approval prior to final plat.
9. The Cash Park Fee obligation shall be applicable.
121
-
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #83-183
• RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF CREATIVE RESOURCE CENTER (CRC) FOR RYAN CONSTRUCTION
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Creative Resource Center for Ryan Construction, dated
June 13, 1983, of 1.5 acres for a 21,000 sq. ft. office building, a copy of which is
on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the
Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein
approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the
, 1983.
day of
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
B. CRC, by Ryan Construction. Request fo
r
Z
o
n
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
ZETinge from Rural to Office for a 21,00
0
s
q
.
f
t
.
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
,
and Preliminary Plat of 1.5 acres for one
l
o
t
f
o
r
a
n
o
f
f
i
c
e
land use. Location: City West Parkway. A
p
u
b
l
i
c
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
.
Jerry Junkman, Ryan Construction, present
e
d
a
n
d
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
for CRC, Creative Resource Center, for a
2
1
,
0
0
0
s
q
.
f
t
.
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
i
n
the City West Planned Unit Development
a
r
e
a
.
M
r
.
J
u
n
k
m
a
n
s
t
a
t
e
d
that the condition of the July 8, 1983
,
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
g
realignment of the west entrance woul
d
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
i
e
d
w
i
t
h
b
y
t
h
e
developer. He added that the developer
s
w
o
u
l
d
,
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
l
i
k
e
t
o
. maintain a "right-in/right-out" entr
a
n
c
e
a
t
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
e
n
d
o
f
t
h
e
property, rather than eliminating that ent
r
a
n
c
e
a
s
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
Staff Report.
Staff reviewed the other conditions of th
e
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
o
f
J
u
l
y
8
,
1983, recommending approval of the project
.
Chairman Bearman .questioned how many
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
p
a
c
e
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
required for the project if it were all
o
f
f
i
c
e
.
S
t
a
f
f
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
d
that an additional 36 spaces would be req
u
i
r
e
d
;
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
t
h
e
s
t
u
d
i
o
space was not counted as office space f
o
r
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
s
a
s
i
t
would not be occupied in the same manner
a
s
t
h
e
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
p
a
c
e
within the building. Staff added that
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
h
a
d
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
o
v
e
r
issuance of an occupancy permit for the
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
a
t
a
l
l
t
i
m
e
s
.
I
f
the building were to be sold, it would
l
i
k
e
l
y
o
n
l
y
b
e
s
o
l
d
t
o
a
future occupant needing a studio; if not
,
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
w
o
u
l
d
n
o
t
a
l
l
o
w
it to be occupied by a user which would no
t
f
i
t
.
M
r
.
S
c
o
t
t
L
u
n
d
e
b
y
,
CRC, stated that this building was intende
d
t
o
b
e
t
h
e
i
r
h
e
a
d
q
u
a
r
t
e
r
s
for the foreseeable future.
Planning Commission Minutes 6 July 11, 1983
Johannes asked, in terms in the exterior finish, whether the block
would be carried through around the entire building. Mr. Junkman
responded that it would.
Johannes asked about the metal stairway located at the rear of the
building. Mr. Junkman responded that the stairway was located there
to provide access from the upper level to the pond area at the rear
of the building. Johannes asked Staff if there were any
requirements regarding metal stairways in the City Code. Staff
responded that there were not.
Torjesen questioned what had been approved for this site within the
original City West Planned Unit Development. Staff responded that
office use was approved for this site, but that it was not required
to be residential in character. Also, square footage of the office
building was limited. This site complied with the approved square
footage requirements.
Chairman Bearman asked if the rooftop mechanical would be screened
as part of this building design. Mr. Junkman stated that the final
detail of the rooftop mechanical had not yet been determined.
Planner Enger stated that since a portion of the building was
designed with the exterior finish of cedar, it was expected that the
screening material for the rooftop mechanical unit(s) would be cedar
as well, in order to provide screening of an architecturally
integral nature.
Torjesen stated that he recalled CRC had been part of another
proposal within the Bryant Lake Office Tech Center and asked if
proponents had decided to change their location due to the types of
neighboring uses which had been approved, i.e. high tech
office/industrial uses. Mr. Lundeby responded that the site of the
current proposal was the site they originally wanted for their
structure, especially due to the background land features, such as
the pond. It became more feasible to return to their original
choice of a site; therefore, they would not be locating in the
Bryant Lake Office Tech Center.
Torjesen stated that he did felt that the plan approved for the City
West Business Center by the Council and the Planning Commission was
the one in which the buildings were required to be residential in
character; therefore, he was not in favor of this proposal since it
was not, in his opinion, residential in character.
Marhula noted an unusually high grade differential in the parking
lot area. Mr. Scott Anderson, ADI, owners of the property, stated
that this would be corrected to spread the grade across the site
more evenly.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Marhula, seconded by Gartner, to close the public
hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes 7 July 11, 1983
Motion carried--6-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Marhula, seconded by Gartner, to recommend to the
City Council approval of the request of CRC/Ryan Construction for
Zoning District change from Rural to Office for a 21,000 sq. ft.
office building, based on written.materials and plans dated June 13,
1983, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated
July 8, 1983.
Motion carried--5-1-0 (Torjesen against)
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Marhula, seconded by Gartner,to recommend to the
City Council approval of the request of CRC/Ryan Construction for
Preliminary Plat of 1.5 acres for a 21,000 sq. ft. office building,
based on written materials and plans dated June 13, 1983, and
subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 8,
1983.
Motion carried--5-1-0 (Torjesen against)
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Steve Durham, Assistant Planner
THOUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: July 8, 1983
PROJECT: CRC Office Building
LOCATION: City West Parkway, City West PUD
APPLICANT: Ryan Construction
. FEE OWNER: Richard W. Anderson, Inc.
REQUESTS: 1. Zoning of 1.5 acres from Rural to Office
2. Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review
3. Variance to Parking Requirement (Board of Appeals)
Backqround/Land Use
City West, an 87-acre PUD for office and high density residential use, was approved
by the City Council on November 17, 1981. The proposed CRC office land use is in
conformance with the original PUD Concept and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. An
Environmental Assessment Worksheet was prepared for the original PUD.
Existing Site Character
The north border of the site is City West Parkway, the east and south areas remain
as open space, and to the west, land is designated for future office use.
Currently, the site is rough graded with elevations ranging from 900 ft. in the
center to 892 ft. in the southwest corner. Existing drainage is to a catch basin
east of the site and to an off-site ravine to the west.
Soils are conducive for development.
The site contains no significant vegetation or wildlife.
Ordinance Requirements/Project Information
Code requirements for minimum lot size, lot width, lot depth, front yard setback,
side yard setbacks, and rear yard setbacks and maximum height of structure are met.
The proposed office building is a two-story structure, utilizing burnished block
with bronze plated glass and cedar siding. A variance will be required from the
Board of Appeals for exterior materials because the cedar siding covers more than
CRC/Ryan Construction Staff Report 2 July 8, 1983
25% of the north, east, and west building elevations.
Following is proposed development information for the s
i
t
e
:
Total Site Area
70,000 sq. ft.--1.5 acres
Gross Building Area
21,000 sq. ft.
Office
13,100 sq. ft.
Studio & Storage
8,000 sq. ft.
The proponent is requesting a variance from standard
o
f
f
i
c
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Sixty-two stalls are proposed; however, 69 stalls are
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
a
c
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
t
o
C
o
d
e
.
Site Plan
The proposed grading plan indicates minimal altera
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
a
s
i
t
e
x
i
s
t
s
'currently. Catch basins should be added to the p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
r
a
t
h
e
r
t
h
a
n
t
h
e
proposed sheet drainage to the pond. There is existi
n
g
s
t
o
r
m
s
e
w
e
r
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
i
n
C
i
t
y
West Parkway. Staff recommends piped drainage to
t
h
e
c
a
t
c
h
b
a
s
i
n
s
t
o
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
t
e
surface runoff across the pedestrian walkway. .
Proposed access to the site is provided by two ri
g
h
t
-
i
n
/
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
u
t
d
r
i
v
e
s
.
T
h
e
western access does not align with the existing med
i
a
n
c
u
t
.
T
h
e
e
a
s
t
e
r
n
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
s
probably unnecessary, and should not be allowed as
a
f
u
l
l
a
c
c
e
s
s
d
u
e
t
o
s
i
t
e
l
i
n
e
and spacing problems. Staff would suggest utilizati
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
c
c
e
s
s
p
o
i
n
t
west of the proposed access point via a right-of-
w
a
y
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
o
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
adjustment.
Utilities
The site will be serviced by existing watermain, s
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
s
e
w
e
r
,
a
n
d
s
t
o
r
m
s
e
w
e
r
located under City West Parkway.
Assessments
Property assessment for improvements to Shady Oak Roa
d
w
i
l
l
b
e
o
n
a
n
a
r
e
a
b
a
s
i
s
o
n
all sites in City West PUD.
Screening
Staff recommends submission of a revised landscape pl
a
n
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
rooftop mechanical equipment. Screening of the no
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
parking lot and
loading/service area are unacceptable. Use of taller evergreens around
loading/service areas is recommended.
Easement
acres from Rural to
An easement will be required for the pedestrian trail
o
n
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
.
RECOMmENDATIONS
The Planning Staff recomnends approval of the zonin
g
o
f
1
.
5
CRC/Ryan Construction Staff Report
3 July 8, 1983
Office for a 21,000 sq. ft. office building, approval of the preliminary plat, and
site plan subject to the following:
1. Proponent must apply to the Board of Appeals for a variance to allow more
than 25% use of cedar siding on the north, east, and west elevations.
2. Proponent must apply to Board of Appeals for a parking variance, or provide
proof of parking for the seven additional -stalls required by Code.
3. All drainage to the east and south shall be handled in storm sewer.
4. Redesign of the western access drive is required to utilize the existing
access drive located across from the existing median cut in City West
Parkway.
5. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall provide a revised
landscape and screening plan showing screening of rooftop mechanical
equipment and screening of the parking and loading areas from public roads
and differing land uses.
6. . Proponent shall submit an easement for the pedestrian walkway.
7. Proponent shall meet with the City Engineering Department with regard to
sanitary sewer and storm water drainage.
8. All signage shall conform to City Code.
9. Cash Park Fees must be paid at the time of building permit issuance.
10. Proponent must receive approval from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
prior to building permit issuance.
11. Property assessments will be on an area basis in City West PUD for incurred
upgrading costs to Shady Oak Road.
AUGUST 2,1983
a, CHUCKY CHEESES PIZZA
8755 VOID OUT CHECK
8756 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF P/S
8757
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
8758 MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE
8759 JAN LUOMA
8760 ANDREW BENDER
8761
OLD PEORIA COMPANY INC
8762
TWIN CITY WINE CO
8763
CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO
8764
MARK VII SALES INC
8765
ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
8766 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
8767 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC
8768
INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO
8769 PAUSTIS & SONS
8770 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC
8771 TARGET STORES INC
8772 U S POSTMASTER
8773
DANA GIBBS
8774 SAILORS WORLD
8775 RALPH KRATOCHVIL
8776 HAUGS SUPER VALU
KATHY ANDERSON
'8//8 LYNN HVIDSTEN •
8779 ANDY PAUPORE
0780 MIKE RUEGEmER
8781 NICOLE SANDEREGGER
8782 CINDY SCHoLLE
8783 KRIS KRYSTOFIAK
8784 MARY KENYON
8785 SUZANNE MULLEN
8786 MEGAN RIPKA
8787 OLD PEORIA COMPANY INC
8788 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALES
8789 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO
8790 PAUSTIS & SONS
8791 EAGLE WINE CO
8792 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC
8793 DIRECTOR OF PROPERTY TAXATION
8794 KATHY KOCKLIN
8795 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
8796 MARK VII SALES INC
8797 PRIOR WINE CO
8798 LIGHTNING TRUCKING
8799 COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES
8800 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
1 AE1NA LIFE INSURANCE
2 FOLRAL RESERVE BANK
3803 MNISSIO:a OF REVENUE
8804 MINNLSOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
8805 GREAT v:Sr LIFE ASSURANCE
8306 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS
8807 I' ERA
Pr.7.11A')
EXPENSES-MUNCHKINS PROGRAM
MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS
JUNE FUEL TAX
SUBSCRIPTION-CITY MANAGER
REFUND-PRINT MAKING
REFUND-RACQUETBALL
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
WINE
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
CONFERENCE-COMMUNITY SERVICES
CLAY PIGEONS-POLICE DEPT
POSTAGE-POLICE DEPT
PACKET DELIVERY
-DEPOSIT ON 3 SAILBOATS-COMMUNITY SERVICES
PAID BY DONATIONS
INSTRUCTOR-FITNESS CLASSES/FEES PAID
EXPENSES-MUNCHKINS PROGRAM
REFUND-ROLLER SKATING
REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES
REFUND-ROLLER SKATING
REFUND-ROLLER SKATING
REFUND-JUNIOR GOLF CLASSES
REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES
EXPENSES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
REFUND-ROLLER SKATING
REFUND-ROLLER SKATING
REFUND-ROLLER SKATING
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
WINE
LIQUOR
EDENVALE EAST PARK TAXES
PLAYGROUND PROGRAM EXPENSES
WINE
WINE
WINE
FREIGHT CHARGES-LIQUOR STORES
CONFERENCE-FINANCE DEPT
PAYROLL 7/22/83
PAYROLL 7/22/83
PAYROLL 7/22/83
PAYROLL 7/22/83
PAYROLL 7/22/83
PAYROLL 7/22/83
PAYROLL 7/22/33
PAYROLL 7/22/83 '
kA ti
12.70
0.00
16.50
1386.24
14.95
10.00
18.00
3032.54
128.76
130.80
169.60
1906.70
993.20
2797.26
375.64
272.00
65.00
27.93
485.-
65.
255.
66.50
34.78
7.00
25.00
3.50
3.50
18.00
25.00
37.50
7.00
3.50
3.50
2921.48
2059.93
626.72
130.60
650.96
2819.5;
5890.11
68.93
3883.50
100.00
70.70
31.80
120.M
22484.36
108.00
16105.49
9144.V
65.0o
2807.0)
14)83.4'.
PAYROLL 7/22/83
EXPENSES-SUMMER PROGRAM
WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
RESCUE CALLS
RESCUE CALLS
RESCUE CALLS
RESCUE CALLS
RESCUE CALLS
RESCUE CALLS
RESCUE CALLS
RESCUE CALLS
RESCUE CALLS
RESCUE CALLS
RESCUE CALLS
RESCUE CALLS
RESCUE CALLS
RESCUE CALLS
RESCUE CALLS
RESCUE CALLS
RESCUE CALLS
RESCUE CALLS
RESCUE CALLS
STRIPING P/S PARKING LOT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PENS-PARK PLANNING
.CANOE-PARK DEPT
INSTALL TELEPHONE SYSTEM-P/S BUILDING
LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT
DUES-WATER DEPT
BUS SERVICE-SUMMER PROGRAMS
ALARM SYSTEM-SENIOR CITIZENS BUILDING
CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
BLACKTOP
GEAR/HOOD LATCH-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
PAINT-WATER DEPT
G -SERVICE-MITCHELL ROAD & TECHNOLOGY DRIVE/
-CITY WEST/SHADY OAK FEASIBILITY/ANDERSON
LAKE PARKWAY/PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE
8808 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK
a' RIVERS EDGE TUBING
DAVID ANDREASON
BOB BAKKEN
8812
TROY BENTLEY
8313
BRIAN FISCHER
8314
PAUL GILBERTSON
8815 MARK HAGEN
8316 RANDY JACKSON
8817
KEITH JOHNSON
8318 TODD LANGE
8319 KIM PALMER
8320 KRIS PALMER
8821 MATT SAUER
8322
RYAN SKATRUD
8323
JILL STEEN
8824
KEVIN STEVENSON
8625
JILL STIELE
8826 AMY WESTPHAL
8827
DOUG ANDREWS
8878
SPENCER LEE CONRAD
8829
RICHARD R DENTON
8330 FRANK ELLERING
8331
ROBERT RICHARD GRANT
8832
GENE JACOBSON
8 4113 WALTER CHARLES JAMES
RONALD 0 JOHNSON
fw5 BRADLEY E LARSON
8835
GARY LEE MEYER
8837
ERIK GERHARDT PETERSON
8838 DOUGLAS LEE PLEHAL
8839
JOHN DAVID RIEGERT
8840
MICHAEL JOHN ROGERS
8841
CHARLES SCHAITBERGER
8842
RICHARD W SEEGER
8643 MARC LEWIS THIELMAN
8844
THOMAS D WILSON
8845
STEPHEN WHITE
6846
AAA STRIPING SERVICE CO
6647
ACRO-MINNESOTA INC
8648
ALDY GRAPHIC SUPPLY INC
8849
ALUMACRAFT BOAT COMPANY
8650
AMERICAN BELL
8851 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS
8852
AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC
8853
ARA TRANSPORTATION
8854
ARMOR SECURITY INC
8355
ASPLUND COFFEE CO INC
6856
ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC
8857
ASTLLFORD EQUIPMENT CO INC
BARRY A SEWALL
BLNNET RINGROSE WOLSFELD JARVIS
37.50
20.00
28.80
28.80
16.80
26.40
26.40
26.40
16.80
21.60
21.60
26.40
28.80
1::44g
16.00
31.20
26.40
28.40
16.00
32.00
64.00
72.00
24.00
32.00
40.00
64.00
48.00
48.00
8.00
32.00
48.00
24.00
16.00
40.00
8.00
44.00
180.15
1.75
311.50
5643.?0
58.a,
1 71ff
77. Ut
1537.3k
21.1(
189.11,
37091.S-.
4694848
MO DENIS BILLMEYER
8861 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING INC
8862 BREDEMUS HARDWARE CO
8863 BROCK WHITE COMPANY
8364 ANDREA BROSCH
8865 BROWN PHOTO
8866 BURTON EQUIPMENT INC
8867 BUSINESS FURNITURE INC
8368 BUTCHS BAR SUPPLY
8869 STEVE CALHOON
8370 CARDOX CORPORATION
8371 CARLSON REFRIGERATION CO INC
8872 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS
8873 CHAPIN PUBLISHING COMPANY
8374 CLEAN SWEEP
8375 CLERK OF COURTS-EAU CLAIRE COUNTY
8876 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
8877 COMMUNITY DANCE CENTER
8378 SPENCER CONRAD
8379 COPY EQUIPMENT INC
8680 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY
8681 DALCO
8882 DORHOLT PRINTING/STATIONERY INC
pC,Q3 CHARLES P DOWNER
! , DRuMMoRD AMERICAN CORPORATION
8885 DUSTCOATING INC
8886 JOY A EASTMAN
8887 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT f272
6888 CITY OF EDINA
8869 IHAB ELKAFFAS
8390 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC
8891 JON B ELVY
8592 EMERGENCY SERVICE SYSTEMS INC
8393 FREDDY ENDORF
8394 CHRIS ENGER
8S95 JACOB EVENS
8896 FARMERS STEEL CO
6897 EIRE CHIEF MAGAZINE
8898 MARY A FRITcHMAN
8899 FUNK-NANECY DISTRIBUTORS INC
8900 GU W DISTRIBUTING
8901 G S PRODUCTS INC
6902 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC
8903 GLIDDEN PAINT
8904 ED GREGORY
5905 HACH COMPANY
$906 BENJAMIN HADDORFF
8907 REBECCA PLOWMAN-HAHN
JIM HATCH SALES COMAPNY INC
HAyES CONTRACTORS
6910 HEDBER6 & SONS CO
3935648
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-SERVICE-WESTWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK/ARBON
-GLEN/CARDINAL CRFA III/VALLEYVIEW ROAD
TECHNOLOGY DRIVE/PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE
DOOR STOP HOLDERS-P/S BUILDING
CONCRETE SEAL/PAINT-P/W BUILDING
INSTRUCTOR-RACQUETBALL/FEES PAID
-FILM PROCESSING-PLANNING/POLICE DEPT/ENG
DEPT/PARK PLANNING
CABINET-P/S BUILDING
30 CHAIRS/4 FILES-P/S BUILDING
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES
MILEAGE & EXPENSES-PARK PLANNING
CARBON DIOXIDE-WATER DEPT
48 WIRE DIVIDERS-LIQUOR STORES
REPAIR WEED CUTTER-PARK MAINTENANCE
LEGAL ADS
STRIPING-PARK DEPT
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING UNDER COURT ORDER
SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE
INSTRUCTORS-EXERCISE CLASSES/FEES PAID
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT •
FIELD BOOK/TAPE/BLUELINE-ENGINEERING DEPT
QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT
CLEANING SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
RUST PENETRANT-WATER & STREET DEPT
OIL-STREET DEPT
MILEAGE
JUNE CUSTODIAL SERVICE
JUNE TESTS-WATER DEPT
REFUND-SWIMMING
SAFETY MASK/JACKET-WATER DEPT
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
REPAIR SQUAD CARS
REFUND-SWIMMING
JULY EXPENSES
REFUND-SWIMMING
STEEL-PARK BUILDING
SUBSCRIPTION-FIRE DEPT
MILEAGE
CARPET-P/S BUILDING
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES
SEAL FLOORS-P/S BUILDING
RADIO REPAIR & PARTS
PAINT-P/S & P/W BUILDING
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT
REFUND-SWIMMING
INSTRUCTOR-TENNIS/FEES PAID
4 MOPS & BROOMS-PARK MAINTENANCE
REFUND-BUILDING DEPT
6 FT PARKING CURBS-P/S BUILDING
/64 1
180.00
4892.20
130.01
335.50
108.00
149.05
236.13
6537.68
153.80
72.88
1596.42
174.52
37.46
235.20
551.33
7.50
3840.90
750.00
28.20
262.63
1761.15
629.63
52.00
216.00
172.26
7425.00
32.83 :
706.44
107.50 ;
17.00 '
45.35
132.00
867.8:1
23.00
165.00
8.00
12.04
17.00
107.0o
299.65
50.13
350.00
799.73
2286.b3
103.0)
1280.3n
11.3,
785.01
177.4o
15.50
416.0)
41.57
2259.50
840.00
10.00
25.00
5.00
180.91
60.00
40.00
23.00
200.65
32.00
15.00
17.55
54.58
70.00
1160.90
49.75
216.00
918.89
28.15
15.90
20.010
441.34
6.50
50.00
7.73
171.85
21.00
453.00
49.00
64795.50
46795.27
823.70
659.57
6.75
692.13
2787.91
200.00
47.12
35.51
385.50
25.00
21.25
51.01
4.16
22973.84
2476.11
14.00
8.61
25.6o
105.75
264.0,1
24.00
8911 SHERIFFS DEPT-COUNTY OF HENN
8 HENNEPIN COUNTY
89,..s HENNEPIN TECHNICAL CENTERS
8914 KAREN HERMANSEN
8915 PATTY HIGGINS
8916 JOHN HUGHES
8917 IBM
8918 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BLDG
8919 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF FIRE
8920 J & R RADIATOR CORP
8921 WALLY JAMES
8922 CHRIS JESSEN
8923 GEO JEWELL ELECTIC MOTORS
8924 CARL JULLIE
8925 KMART
8926 KAPAK CORPORATION '
8927 KEYS WELL DRILLING CO
8928 KATHRYN KOCHLIN
8929 KEVIN M KOHLS
8930 KROY INDUSTRIES INC
8931 J KRIS KRYSTOFIAK
8932 ROBERT LAMBERT
8933 KATHLEEN LANE
8934 LEEF BROTHERS INC
8935 LINHOFF COLOR PHOTO LAB
["5 MAPLEWOOD SEWER & WATER
EUGENE MARTENSON
8938 ROBERT MARTZ
8939 AMY MCDONALD
8940 MERIT/JULIAN GRAPHICS
8941 METROPOLITAN FIRE EQUIPMETN CO
8942 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMIS
8943 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMIS
8944 MIDLAND PRODUCTS COMPANY
8945 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
8946 MINNEAPOLIS AREA CHAPTER
8947 MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY
8948 MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY
8949 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORES
8950 MINNESOTA TORO INC
8951 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP .
8952 MUNICILITE CO
8953 NATIONAL MUNICIPAL LEAGUE •
8954 NATIONAL RECREATION & PARK ASSOC
8955 NOUN PRODUCTS INC
8956 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
8957 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
8958 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE
8959 MELISSA OLSEN
8960 SIEVE OLSTAD
( '1 CHRIS PALM
MARK PANNKUK
8963 PATRICK PEREZ
8964 WILLIE PEREZ
MAY BOOKING FEES-POLICE DEPT
JUNE BOARD OF PRUONERS
SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT
REFUND-LIQUOR SERVERS LICENSE
REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES
REFUND-ASSESSING DEPT
SERVICE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT
DUES-BUILDING DEPT
DUES-FIRE DEPT
REPAIR HOSES-PUBLIC SAFETY
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
REPAIR EXHAUST FAN-FIRE DEPT
EXPENSES
CANOE PADDLES-SUMMER RECREATION PROGRAMS
EVIDENCE POUCHES-POLICE DEPT
REPAIR BACKWASH PUMP-WATER DEPT
MILEAGE
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
OFFICE SIGNS-P/S BUILDING
MILEAGE-PLAYGROUND SUPERVISOR
BOOK-COMMUNITY SERVICES
REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES
SERVICE
FILM DEVELOPED-PLANNING
REFUND-OUTSIDE SUR & WTR LICENSE
POSTAGE FOR FIREARM SAFETY FILMS
AUGUST EXPENSES
REFUND-SWIMMING
ENVELOPES-CITY HALL
CHEMICALS-POLICE DEPT
JUNE SAC CHARGES
AUGUST SEWER SERVICE
CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-ROUND LAKE & C/C
BLACKTOP
FILM RENTAL-COMMUNITY CENTER
SERVICE
SERVICE
DUES-LIQUOR STORES •
BEARINGS-PARK MAINTENANCE
SERVICE
STROBE LIGHTS
DUES-MANAGER
BOOK-COMMUNITY SERVICES
REPAIR RED LIGHT ON SQUAD CAR
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REFUND-SWIMMING
MILEAGE
INSTRUCTOR-EXERCISE CLASSES/FEES PAID
MILEAGE-FORESTRY DEPT
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
15070661
8965 E GRANT PERL SOD FARMS INC
8966 D C PETERSON DOOR COMPANY
( ' PHOTO QUICK
8:wd POLAR PLASTICS INCORPORTED
8969 POWER PROCESS EQUIPMENT INCORP
8970 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN
8971 PRAIRIE OFFICE PRODUCTS INC
8972 JERRY PRODOEHL
8973 JIM PUFAHL
8974 QUAL-CHEM INDUSTRIES
8975 QUALITY FITNESS
8976 RAPID COPY INCORPORATED
8977 DAVID RAQUET
8978 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS
8979 CITY OF RICHFIELD
8980 CITY OF RICHFIELD
8981 ROBERTS DRUG
8982 SPS COMPANIES INC
8983 ST REGIS CORPORATION
8984 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES INC
8985 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO
8986 SHAKOPEE FORD INC
8987 STEVE R SINELL
8988 BEN SKINNER
8989 SON OF A PRINTER INC
8990 BRIAN SORENSON
P n cl1 DOUG SPIKE
2 SPORTS WORLD-EDEN PRAIRIE
8993 STATE OF MINNESOTA
8994 THOMAS TESCH
8995 TOTAL PATIENT CARE SYSTEMS
8996 TRACY OIL CO INC
8997 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS
8998 U Z ENGINEERED PRODUCTS
8999 UNITED LABORATORIES INC
9000 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
9001 VAN WATERS & ROGERS
9002 VAUGHNS NCB 06
9003 NCB 06 VAUGHNS
9004 VIKING BUSINESS INTERIORS INC
9005 VOSS ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY
9006 DAVID WALLER
9007 WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY
9008 WATERITE INC
9009 SANDY WERTS
9010 JOE WIETHOFF
9011 WOODLAKE SANITARY SERVICE INC
9012 XEROX CORPORATION
9013 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
9014 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY
9015 ZIEGLER INC
STUART ALEXANDER
JAN FLYNN
9018 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERVICES
ROCK-P/S BUILDING
REPAIR DOOR-FIRE DEPT
PRINTS-COMMUNITY SERVICES
SMOKE EXHAUST VENTUBE-FIRE DEPT
0 RINGS-STREET DEPT
EQUIPMENT PARTS-PARK MAINTENANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
CAR WASH SOAP
HYDROSTATIC WEIGHTING-C/C FEES PAID
ID CARDS
VISE-P/W BUILDING
REGISTER PAPER/REPAIR REGISTER-L/S
COMPUTER RENTAL-POLICE DEPT
RICHFIELD DISPATCH SERVICE
SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT & SUMMER PROGRAMS
VALVE/COUPLINGS/EXT RINGS/OIL/PIPES-STREET
LUMBER-PARK MAINTENANCE
PORTABLE RESTROOMS
COUNTER TOP-WATER DEPT
CYLINDER/CAP/SPARK PLUGS/CAR MATS
EXPENSES
MILEAGE-FORESTRY DEPT
PRINTING-ROUND LAKE & RILEY LAKE PARK
DRAMA SPECIALIST-PLAYGROUND PROGRAM
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
4 JUMP ROPES-COMMUNITY SERVICES
CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FOR BOILER-WATER
LICENSE FEE-STREET DEPT
OXYGEN EQUIPMENT & RESUSCITATORS
FUEL
TISSUE PAPER/12 PEN HOLDERS-C/S
SHELVES-PARK MAINTENANCE
CHEMICALS-P/W & PARK BUILDING
FIRE SCHOOL
CHLORINE-WATER DEPT
FLAG & STAND-POLICE DEPT
2 FLAGS
SHELVING-PARK MAINTENANCE
LIGHT BULBS
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
• HOSE SPANNER-FIRE DEPT
.CHLORINE SENSOR-COMMUNITY CENTER
MILEAGE
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
1 TRASH BASKET-PARK MAINTENANCE
SERVICE
FIRST AID CABINET-STREET DEPT
2 BROOMS/CHEMICALS-STREET DEPT
REPAIR FUEL LEAKS-STREET DEPT
MILEAGE
EXPENSES-SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER
lEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT-PLANNING DEPT
640.00
66.40
7.90
22.56
11.14
35.50
10.89
26.30
228.00
194.45
124.00
175.00
729.90
77.60
740.00
7625.00
43.99
170.93
584.50
2964.13
114.50
345.06
6.00
117.75
101.81
135.00
12.00
16.90
35.00
15.00
2625.10
8960.03
35.53
602.24
368.58
55.00
792.60
131.50
250.00
5008.04
531.54
90.00
66.00
96.00
100.63
192.00
50.00
1239.84
167.00
250.70
7.67
22.71,
12.11,
242.31
$371,02/.4.1
( , 17
3727445
IV13
Auyust 2, 1983
Cash Disbursements by Fund Number
141394.22
27.80
14413.12
10061.18
5890.11
22824.53
14291.31
1052.00
18024.33
111674.01
658.50
30716.33
10 GENERAL
11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBTEDNE
15 LIQUOR STORE P V M
17 LIQUOR STORE PRESERVE
31 PARK ACQUISTION & DEVELOP
36 P/S & P/W BUILDING BOND
51 IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION
57 ROAD IMPROVE CONST FUND
73 WATER FUND
77 SEWER FUND
81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND
90 TAX INCREMENT
$371027.44
-
MEMO
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
Jean Johnson, Zoning Administrator
THROUGH:
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE:
July 21, 1983
RE: BEARMAN'S DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION OFF EDEN PRAIRIE
ROAD IN THE NORTH 4 OF SECTION 29.
In conjunction with new house construction at 9630 Eden Prairie
Road, Bearman's are proposing to construct a driveway upon slopes
of 12% and having a 30 foot elevation difference. This type of
development on what the City Code defines as 'Steep Slopes', requires
submission of a permit to the City for review and approval.
Application material dated July 16, 1983 has been submitted for
Commission and City Council review..
The proposed driveway is approximately 1100 feet in length. The
drive originates at Eden Prairie Road and traverses up an elevation
• 68 feet higher than the point of origin.
Drainage
Surface water from the overall 12 acre Bearman site has been draining
to the north and northeast into a gully which is next to the farm
road of the property to the north. After traveling in the gully,
the drainage fans out approximately 800 feet west of Eden Prairie
Road and the washed soil is deposited over the Sable driveway.
This existing drainage pattern is depicted on Attachment #1.
The Bearman driveway design with its revised drainage pattern along
the drive will reduce surface water drainage from this 12 acre
site to the gully and redirect theiniajority of it back onto the site.
Soils
Dickman and Hubbard Soils are located in the area of the driveway
construction. In the Hennepin County Soil Survey Report, these
soils are porous in nature and have good hearing rapacity, stability,
and low shrinitswell characteristics for road locations. Because the
Dickman soil is susceptible to wind blowing and the Hubbard is susceptible
to erosion, care must be taken in installing erosion control barriers prior
to grading work and restoration must be promptly done.
1/11(.".
Memo-Bearman Driveway Review
July 21, 1983
'Vegetation
At the drive's proposed connection to Eden Prairie Road there are
20 foot high boxelder trees and some under brush. remainder
• of the drive occurs over an abandoned farm field'which mixed weeds
and grasses have grown.
' Access to Eden Prairie Road
•The drive has been proposed approximately 20 feet south of the
property's north property line and 70 feet from the Sable drive
to the north. Sight lines for this access point should be
submitted for the City Engineer's review. It is understood that
the Bearman's do have a 40 foot wide access easement over the
Sable's southern property edge and drive & this area should be
studied as a possible location if better sight lines are
achieved.
As outlined in the July 16, 1983 letter , the driveway construction
is to be &inches of crushed rockwith a top layer 2 inches thick of
finer rock for a total depth of 8 inches. The drive area will be
compacted prior to the installation of the .crushed rock.
An erosion control plan is submitted depicting staked haybales in
A locations: at Eden Prairie Road, at a location 350 feet from Eden
Prairie Road, at a distance of 750 feet , and at the end of the drive.
Restoration proposed by Bearman's is staked sod along either side of
the proposed drive. • •
The Riley Creek Watershed District Engineer has advised the City that the
development will not require a permit,
SUMRY/FINDINGS
If the drive is constructed as proposed with soil erosion barriers
and prompt restoration with seed and mulch of disturbed areas beyond
the drive surface is accomplished, soil erosion problems will not
occur. .
Natural features to be altered will include boxelder trees at
Eden Prairie Road , weeds, grasses, and the natural topography.
No factors relating to risks to persons, property or animals have
been identified.
Memo-Bearman Driveway Review -3- July 21, 1983
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Planning Staff recommends approval of the driveway development
contingent upon the following:
.1. Construction be as per the submitted application material
and be accomplished and fully restored by the Oct.30th,
.
1983 construction scheduled . Restoration is to be
staked sod along either side of the driveway.
2.. Sight line calculations be submitted to the City Engineer
and the access point to Eden Prairie Road be built as per
the Engineer's recommendations. .
3. That the applicants assume full responsibility for maintenance
of the driveway to prevent erosion. And that if City does -
find that soil erosion is occurring, that owners repair such
erosion upon receiving notice from City.
(h;25)
)
O vP
•.‘t•Vo .• '0?
(0) .
'4 srix etra wine,
r rops4 ctrit)C,
AtTIACl/AliAir #1 tinta .
A
1 Zi;54 Ities 4'S Di
---pli
1214.38 ! 17.82 Ch ... 473.68
V
Eff rellaW,a Z211==:622=2:51=7;1 •
SCa I e feet
Riley- Purgatory Creek Watershed District
8950 COUNTY ROAD 44
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344
Mr. William Bearman
S.N. Bearman Brokerage Co. :
P.O. Box 27227
Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427
Re: Bearman Ranch: Eden Prairie
Dear Mr. Beaman:
Sincerely
C. Obermeyer
ARP. ENGINEERING CO
Engineers for the District
The engineering advisors to the Board of Managers of the Riley-Purgatory
Creek Watershed District have reviewed the plans as submitted for the Beaman
Ranch in Eden Prairie. Since this project does not meet the criteria set
,forth in Section E(2) of the District's Revised Rules and Regulations, a
grading and land alteration permit will not be required from the District for
this project.
If you have any questions or we may be of further assistance, please call
me at 920-0655.
RCO/gbs
c: Mr. Fred Richards
Mr. Fritz Rahr
Ms. Jean Johnson
109
Clau
William.Bearman e
•
B .s• t
Kindei.,4 ygards
Wik''.(X-aV•ael-t.,./
July 16, 1983
Mr., Chris Enger
Planner
1. •
City of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Enger,
Pursuant to Section 11.60 of the c
i
t
y
c
o
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
Eden Prairie Sloped Ground Develop
l
e
n
t
a
n
d
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
we
Wish to apply for a permit to cons
t
r
u
c
t
a
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
t
o
o
u
r
future home at 9630 Eden Prairie Ro
a
d
,
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
,
M
i
n
n
.
.
We offer the following information:
1. The construction of the road will
t
a
k
e
p
l
a
c
e
sometime between July 15, 1983 and
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
3
0
,
1983.
2. The soil types located where the c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
of the road is to take place is san
d
y
l
o
a
m
y
;
below this topsoil is clay and sand
.
3. A map ,showing the topography is attached
.
4. The map showing the topography als
o
s
h
o
w
s
h
o
w
the land is to be altered.
5. This land has been.farmed for at l
e
a
s
t
t
h
e
l
a
s
t
40 Years. While any soil if not p
r
o
p
e
r
l
y
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
would be susceptible to erosion the
m
a
p
s
h
o
w
i
n
g
the topography of the land shows t
h
e
m
a
j
o
r
i
t
y
o
f
the drainage of the parvel not bei
n
g
a
f
f
e
c
t
e
d
b
y
the road. Erosion control measures
w
i
l
l
b
e
t
a
k
e
n
during construction. Clay will be
u
s
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
slope side of the driveway to furt
h
e
r
assist in
maintaining the stability.
•
6. There will be no disturbance of an
y
v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
other than weeds.
7. The surface of the driveway will b
e
6
"
o
f
c
r
u
s
h
e
d
: rock 11/2 -2" with top layer of 3/4 with fine (2
-
inches) for a total of 8 inches.
8. The driveway will be the only acce
s
s
t
o
t
h
e
B
e
a
m
a
n
household. •
We would greatly appreciate being
p
l
a
c
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
a
g
e
n
d
a
s
o
f
the commissions as outlined in Sec
t
i
o
n
1
1
.
6
0
,
s
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
3A2.
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
THRU:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
Planning Commission .
Stephen Sullivan, Assistant City Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
July 18, 1983
MN-TX Building
10301-10379 West 70th Street
APPLICANT & MN-TX & Texas General Partnership
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST: Zoning Amendment & Developer's Agreement Amendment of 18.9 Acres
For An Office/Warehouse Use
BACKGROUND
The Guide Plan depicts the site as industrial. The existing site is zoned 1-2
according to an approved Shady Oak 5th development plan. That plan illustrated
4-60,000 sq. ft. office/warehouse buildings with two outlots. (Fig. #1) The
outlots have since been deeded to the City. The 1-2 zoning was approved in lieu
of the 1-5 because of the impact of inadequate soils on utilization of the site and
the restrictive setback requirement of the 1-5 district which limits the on-site
buildable area. The proponent is now asking for an amendment to the Developer's
Agreement which presently does not allow a variance to be granted for setbacks.
The project was approved at a time when the Guide Plan indicated residential uses
to the west and south of the site. The Shady Oak 5th Developer's Agreement reflects
this by not allowing loading on the south and west exposures. Since then, Lee Data
has been developed in lieu of the proposed residential. The proponent now asks for
an amendment to the Developer's Agreement allowing loading to both the south and
west.
Easements which were given to the City for road extensions to the proposed residen-
tial area are no longer necessary because of Lee Data.
An E.A.W. has been approved.
EXISTING SITE CHARACTER
The site has already been graded and is flat.
Drainage is overland from the north to the south.
Poor soils exist along the east and south perimeters of the parcel.
ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
The project meets or exceeds the City Code requirements for minimum lot size, lot
width, lot depth, rear yard setback, maximum height of structure and F.A.R.
-2-
The site plan indicates parking within the SO' front yard setback adjacent to the
Lee Data secondary access. Currently that extension is under private ownership
but is to be dedicated to the City with the completion of Flying Cloud Road.
The east parking lot is currently placed 8' from the east property line instead of
the 10' required by code.
The parking proposed conforms to City Code requirements.
No landscaping plan has been submitted. The north and east parking lots currently
have direct sightlines from West 70th Street. The 8' greenspace adjacent to the
east parking lot restricts the type of plant material and screening treatment re-
quired.
Screening of the west loading area is accomplished via a 25' high berm which was
grading with the previsouly approved project. A 13' wall is then placed on the north
and south side of this loading area providing screening from the adjacent buildings.
Drive-in doors are located on the back side of building A & C providing screening
from West 70th Street. Screening walls have been placed along the east side of these
loading areas providing screening from the access drive.
The rooftop mechanical shall be screened in an architecturally integral manner.
SITE PLAN
Phase 1 of the development plan proposes 3 office/warehouse buildings; 20,400, 20,800,
and 28,800 sq. ft. The building facade is composed of tip up, pointed, precast,
concrete panels. Phase 2 proposes a continuation of the layout, architecture and
land use of the phase 1 plan. The project is under a single owner and the buildings
are to be leased. Any subdivision of the property would not be approved by the City.
condominiumizing the development with the necessary covenants and restrictions for
separate ownership would be acceptable.
Access to the site is from West 70th Street. The site plan indicates one access onto
a mutually shared interior road system. A 30' wide, protected aisle driveway, runs
from West 70th Street to the southern edge of phase 1 eventually tying to phase 2
of this project.
A minimum amount of grading is proposed. The site is characterized by 1-13% slopes.
Most drainage is caught on-site and piped to Outlot A where a retention pond exists.
Phase 2 drainage runs overland off-site to the southwest.
Water service will tie into an existing 8" main which runs north and south across the
site. Sanitary sewer will also tie to an existing 8" line which runs adjacent to the
existing water main. A 20' wide easement is proposed over these utility lines.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of the requested zoning amendment and Developer's Agreement
amendment subject to the following:
1. Phase 2 will be subject to site plan review and approval by the City.
2. The City will not grant approval allowing subdivision of the property.
-3-
3. Developer's Agreement amended allowing loading areas on the south a
n
d
w
e
s
t
exposure of the site and allowing the Board"of Appeals the ability
t
o
r
e
-
view and grant approval for setback variances.
4. Prior to City Council approval, the proponent shall:
a. Provide detailed plans for review and approval for screening
of rooftop mechanical equipment in an architectural integral
manner.
b. Provide information regarding the architectural finish of the
precast, concrete wall panels.
S. Prior to Building Permit issuance the proponent shall:
a. Receive a variance from the Board of Appeals for parking
within the front yard setback.
b. Redesign the layout of the east parking lot providing a 10'
setback from the east property line:
c. Submit a landscape/screening plan to the Planning Department
for review and approval.
d. Meet with the Engineering Department in regards to water,
sanitary and storm sewer.
e. Place a 20' utility easement over the existing water and
sanitary line.
f. Vacate the utility and drainage and road easement per Document
1371779. A 5' wide utility easement shall be placed along the
west property line.
g. Receive Watershed District approval.
h. Pay the required Cash Park Fee.
SS:md
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Carl Jullic, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
July 27, 1983
Staring Lake Park Trail Easement
At the June 7, 1983 meeting, the City Council reviewed the proposed Easement
Agreement between Joint Independent School District No. 287 and the City of
Eden Prairie for a trail easement along the east side of Staring Lake on
School District 287 property. At that meeting, the City Council agreed to
all terms in the agreement with exception of the language regarding the length
of the lease. The City Council requested that staff discuss a possible
extension of the Easement Agreement terms with the staff from the School Dis-
trict.
On June 22, Bob Lambert and Carl Jullie met with Norm Friederichs, Chairman of
the Board for District 287, and Mr. Ron Carter, Superintendent of Schools for
District 287, to discuss the Easement Agreement. At that meeting, it was agreed
that if the Easement Agreement included language that suggested a ten year
extension to the original easement (provided there had been no problems in the
first ten years) the School Board members, at that time, would understand the
intent of the original easement was to go beyond ten years if the trail proved
to be in the best interests of School :District 287.
Attached to this memo is a letter dated June 29 from Mr. Glenn Purdue, repre-
senting School District. 287, in which he has proposed some revised language
for the easement. Our City Attorney has reviewed this proposed language and
finds it acceptable.
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission reviewed this proposal
at the July 15 meeting and recommended approval with the revised language, and
also requested that the City Council include language in the agreement that
defines the beginning of the ten year term of the lease agreement as the date
that. the City begins construction 011 School District property. The proposed
date for construction on School District property will he during the slimmer of
1985, as that length of trail is the third and final phase of the trail system
around Staring Lake Park.
The Community Services Staff recommend the City Council approve the revised
language and the starting date of the ten year lease agreement to begin in 1985.
Upon approval of these recommndations, they will be forwarded to Mr. Glenn
Purdue in order that he may present them for approval to the School District
hoard and draft the final document_
/6<_1(
Lerom
LvikT
Kommly
()Tam&
lhami
An4,4mA
A.wnWitm
June 29, 1983
Roger A. Pauly, Esq.
Attorney at Law
4108 IDS Center
Minneapolis, MN 55402
RE: Staring Lake Park Trail
Dear Roger:
I do not mean to prolong this negotiation, but I
do have some concerns with the proposed language
contained in your June 27, 1983 letter. The biggest
problem I have is that the language suggests to me that
the grantor would have to "adjudge' that extension of
the easement would be detrimental to the land or the
use of the land. I am concerned that the city might
claim it has a right to an extension unless the
.grantor, after whatever process is consistent with
"adjudging" could make some findings that its use
of the land was impaired. The proposal does not
address the possible transfer of the land, unless
transfer is included within the meaning of "use". The
district does not have full discretion as to whether
to extend the easement if it must find that the ease-
ment detracts from its use of the land.
I enclose a proposed revision, which I have not
cleared with the district. It is my hope that you and
I can agree on some language and recommend it to our
respective clients. I have modified the last sentence
in paragraph 1, at the foot of page 3, as you
recommended. My revision appears in the first para-
20:0 first Bank Place West
Minneapolis
Minnesota 55402
Tetephone 612-333-0543
Ciaron L. LeFevere
Ilerced P. Lefler
J. Dennis O'Brien
Jchn E. Drawz
David J. Kennedy
John B. Dean
Gienn E. Purdue
Richard J. Schictter
Charles L. Ler ever°
Hmen P. Lefler ill
Jehiey J. Strand
Meryl Biorklund
Joni) G. Kiessel
Dare Nolan
Crnay I Lavorato ,
Mizhael A Nash
Lu'f''.nntarek
Jo* licksen
Lizapein D. Moran
Bonn F. Ilice
Lorraine S. Clugg
James J. Thomson, Jr.
16cS
Alv"-
Roger A. Pauly, Esq.
June 29 / 1983
Page Two
graph of page 4. I have added the concept of the
extension being in the "best interests" of the granto
r
and that it be consistent with the intended uses of i
t
s
land and with its mission. Additionally, I have recit
e
d
an acknowledgement that no consideration has been giv
e
n
for the expression of the intent to extend and that the
city recognizes improvements will be placed at its ri
s
k
that the easement may not be extended. The last mentio
n
-
ed matters, concerning consideration, risk and agreem
e
n
t
not to contest are implicit in the conversations you
mentioned in your letter, but I think they should be
explicit to avoid misunderstandings ten years from now.
Please look this over and give me a call.
Very truly yours,
LeFENTERE LEFLER KENNEDY .
. O'BRIEN & DRAM
Glenn E. Purdue
GEP/jm
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Ron Carter (w/enclosure)
Mr. Norman P. Friederich (w/enclosure)
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: July 27, 1983
SUBJECT: Round Lake Park Parking Expansion
Since the completion of the development of Round Lake Park, it has become quite
obvious that at certain peak times the parking capacity at Round Lake Park is
inadequate. On Mondays thru Thursdays, when the four ballfields are scheduled
for two games for each field and when it is a warm clear evening with many people
using the tennis courts and swimming beach, there is a shortage of parking spaces
during the overlap time of scheduled ball games; that is near the end of the first
game when all of the ball players for the second game are arriving.
Each ball team can have up to 15 players. There are two teams on each field
playing and two teams waiting to play; therefore, there could be up to 60 cars
needing parking for each ballfield. A brief survey indicated that an average
of 12 to 13 cars arrive for each team. Using an average of 13 cars per team,
the four ballfields south of Valley View Road require 208 parking spaces during
the overlap period. Figuring 2.5 people per tennis court, the tennis courts
could require 20 parking spaces, and figuring 1 person per lineal foot of beach
frontage, the beach can serve approximately 300 people (figuring 3 people per car
and 100 or more walking or biking to the park) this facility would require approx-
imately 66 parking spaces. The picnic area does not. generally get any substantial
use during the middle of the week. However, totalling the number of cars we '
expect Monday thru Friday on a warm summer day would be 294. There is presently
241 parking spaces south of Valley View Road.
On a warm summer weekend, when we have the pavilion and the park building and
picnic area fully scheduled (300 people), and approximately another 300-400 using
the swimming beach, other picnic facilities, tennis courts, etc, we can expect
a total of 600-700 people at Round Lake Park. Figuring approximately 2.5 people
per car for weekend use, this would generate approximately 280 cars that would
require parking facilities ,:•
If there is any kind of ballfield tournament on a weekend, we can expect an add-
itional 250-300 cars depending on the size of the tournament; therefore, we may
easily have over 500 cars requiring parking facilities at Round Lake Park both south
and north of Valley View Road, plus any people that may using the Community Center.
There is a total of 437 parking spaces in the parking lots south and north of
Valley View Road excluding the 20 parking spaces at the library.
The Community Services Staff feel that an additional 60 parking spaces south of
Valley View Road would eliminate nearly all of the parking problems that we have
routinely during the summer months. lbe Community Services Staff requests that
the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission consider recommending to
the City Council authorization of spending cash park fees to expand parking
facilities at Round Lake Park as per the attached plan.
This plan shows an additional 20 parking spaces to the parking lot north of the
tennis courts and an additional .1(1 parking spacoS that would be created by develop-
ing the existing free skating area between the hockey rinks into a three season
parking lot.
I 6,(.)71
BL:md
-2-
'Staff would recommend that an asphalt roadway and asphalt parking lot with
curbing be developed over the existing skating rink and that this access road
and parking lot be closed for public use during the winter months and retained
as a skating rink.
Other potential areas for expansion of parking spaces in the future are:
. 1. East of the existing Community Center parking lot to the Fire Station.
There is a potential for approximately 60 additional cars.
2. When the regional library is constructed in the Major Center Area,
the existing library at Round Lake Park is scheduled to be removed.
Staff would recommend maintaining the existing 20 car parking lot,
and if needed in the future this parking lot could be expanded by
an additional 40 spaces.
The Community Services Staff would recommend construction of the 20 spaces north
of the tennis courts and the 40 spaces on the existing skating rink during the
Fall of 1983, in order to have these parking spaces available for the summer of
1984. Staff estimates that the additional spaces north. of the tennis courts
would cost approximately $1,200-$1,300 for the City to construct, or approximately
$3,000 to have it contracted; furthermore, staff would estimate that the access
road and parking lot over the skating rink would cost approximately $3,500 for
the materials, plus City staff labor Or approximately $9,000 if this is contracted.
At this time, it is questionable on whether City forces will have the time to
complete these projects in 1983. Staff would recommend contracting for these
projects if the City Public Works and Parks Department are not able to schedule
it during the Fall of 1983.
baseball
field
iiiiraX.VA(7
"Rill . hi ••••
I . ..._____ _ . _ I •••••• • qii.
11'K--111UI P ill H t; 1,1111 lil lfr
:•;'.., i ( pondill ..) Community
; .center...... ,renniiiP,?,.
••• 10, .,,L, rc\ ..)N
:. --....... \e ..../.. ' ' illuiTs-F-"------_1 ,Thir.,_ 11,:',;.•1\o',7,'-.;-1
. ili'l:ililiiiiii ot 1 5..i.r,„ l i t 11111011111Q,.:0,; , ' ,... '' , .............. .. il'\ '
miii.i. J it 1 „ il 1 thjiolillifiviiiiiiy ' 1 .. No
1117
.:.,,,w!!
,......;.4: . enic....-:"-\---;., ; . • , ..... n 11111 I I/II))
,'''.4...•.fri*".• ...".‘ . '''••nY:-. ------__Vd/61"4:**:VI ill )141/ '
'... ''• 4,Q.i,11,:,-.:-.6"--1141, :•••-:
softball
field
............
';1":1;•','".z:;-•
•••.:
„
,
A Ili _
,n !1
,•th Al j horseshoe
IA11 courts
2 tennis-
- -courts
• ( boat launch
r playstructure
•beach 4IV
'III 1111A
•
softball
field
building
rinks softball
N. field
softball
field
1
(11'1 111
j....
1777, i'f711;0 .••'%%::::. softball
field