Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 09/07/1982CITY CI1L TUL OF L TUISDAY, SEPTIMHR 7, 1982 6:00 PM, CITY HAIL COUNCIL MEM8ERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Plan • Fdstrom, Paul Redpath and George TaNgen CI1Y COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Planning Director Chris Foyer, Director of Public Works Fugene A. Dietz, & Director of Community Services Bob lailil -wrt CITY COUNCIL, CITY COUNCIL STAFF AND RLPRISENTATIVE(S) OF BFI 10 TOUR LANDFILL BEFOR E RIGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TUESDAY, SEPILMaER 7, 1982 CITY COUNCIL STAFF: — Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath and George Tan9en City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John Frane, Planning Director Chris Enger, Director of Community Services Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Fugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael PLEDGE OF AllIGIANCE INVUCAIION: Council man Paul Redpath ROLL CALL I. APpROVAL . OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS MINUlES A. Minutes of the Regular _City Council Meetin g held Tuesday, August 3, 1982 B. Minutes of the Joint City Council/Plannifti CuToission Meeting lipid Tuesday, August _17, 1982 CONSINT CAIENDAR A. Final Plat approval, Cardinal Creek 4th Addition (Resolution No. 82-216) B. Final Plat approval, Cardinal Creek 5th Addition (Resolution No. 82-217) C. Receive IOU petition for utility and street improvements for CNR Golden Strip Fast (Resolution No. 82-218) Resolution declaring costs to be assessed and ordering preparation of 1982 Special Assessment Rolls and setting Public Hearing for 7:30 PM, September 21, 1982 (Resolution No. 82-220) D. Page 1700-* Page 1701 Page 1702 Page 1705 Page 1708 Page 1711 E. MNR license for well collector line (2 creek crossings), I.C. 51-354, Page 1712 Phase III City Council Agt-nda -2- Tues.,Septer 7, 1932 F. Receive petition for utility and street improvements for Anderson Lakes Parkway between Mitchell Road and TM 169 and authorize the pr_flparation of a feasibtlity report (Resolution No. 82-219) G., Clerk's License List -H. Resolution approving lease agreement with DNR for trail around Staring lake (Resolution No. 82-21S) I. Award bids for construction of sidewalk on Franlo Road J. Award bids for construction of bike jail on Countl_Road 1 west of Co. Rd. 4 K. Resolution r No. 82-214, requesting Hennepin County to administer t.D.8.6..—ReiTaDilitation Program IV. PUBLIC_HEAR1NGS • Page 1714 Page 1716 Page 1717 Page 1719 Page 1720 Page 1721 A. ARBOR OLEN by BFK Partnership. Request for PUD approval on 40 acres Page 1723 for residentiil uses, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for 24 acres for 51 units and from Rural to RN 6.5 for 8 acres for 28 units, and preliminary plat approval for the construction of 51 single and 28 townhouse units and possible variances. Located in the northeast corner of Baker Road and Valley View Road, and south of Cardinal Creek. (Resolution No. 82-211 - PUD, Ordinance No. 82-23 - Rezoning, and Resolution No. 82-212 - Preliminary Plat) b. NORSEMAN :NDUST;IAL PARK 0TH ADDITION 14 Meleiv .::elle. Request for rezoning 2 acres from Rural to 1-2 Park and preliminary plat approval. Located south of West 74th Street extended. (Ordinance No. 82-24 - Rezoning, and Resolution No. 82-213 - Preliminary Plat) C. USE OF REVENUE SHARING FUNDS V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 3406 - 3717 VI.. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS VII. PETITIONS, REQUEST & COMMUNICATIONS A. Petition from Frank Smetana, Jr. B. Request by Hans Hagen to extend Northmark 4th time limit from July, 1982_t2_,Nly,_1983 C. Request from Historical'& Cultural Commission - Resolution No. 82-221, recognizing "Sunbonnet Day" as an official civic event. Page 1746 Page 1753 Page 1754 Page 1761 Page 1763 Page 1764 V1II. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS1 COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members B. RepprtCit.LkIanager I. proposed 1982 lbali and 1983 budget for Southwest Suburban Cable Cormission _ . . _ _ . _ _ Page 1766 ( X. NEW BUSINESS XI. ADJOURNMENT. 2. Set hearing date for City Budget C. Report of City Attorney City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,September 7, 1982 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1982 Immediately Following City Council Meeting HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom Paul Redpath and George Tangen HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY STAFF: City Manager Carl Jullie, Finance Director John Frane, City Attorney Roger Pauly, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael ROLL CALL CALL MEETING TO ORDER APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS aECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY NEW BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, AUGUST 3, 1982 COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL STAFF: 7:30 PM, CITY HALL Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath and George Tangen City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Planning Director Chris Enger, Director of Community Ser- vices Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael INVOCATION: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Councilman Dean Edstrom was absent. I. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF PARTICIPATION IN "NO FAULT GRIEVANCE PROGRAM" Mayor Penzel noted the Eden Prairie Human Rights and Services Commission received a Certificate of Commendation from the Governor of Minnesota and the State Depart- ment of Human Rights for its participation in the "No Fault Grievance Process." Penzel introduced Jeanette Mika and Larry Simenson, no-fault grievance counselors, who accepted the certificate on behalf of the Commission. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following item was added to the Agenda: IX. D. 3. Authorization of easement acquisition by eminent domain. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to approve the Agenda as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. III. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, JULY 20, 1982 Page 5, para. 5, line 2: change now to "in conjunction with this project." MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Minutes of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, July 20, 1982, as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes -2- August 3, 1982 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 82-18, adopting Chapter 11 (Zoning) of Codification B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 82-17, rezoning .385 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 for construction of one (1) single family home, Gustafson Re- zoning by Paul R. Gustafson. Located across from 9635 and 9629 Bennett Mice. C. Authorization to advertise for bids for construction of County Road 1 West of County Road 4 Bikeway D. Clerk's License List E. Set Public Hearing for vacation of Sanitary Sewer Easement on Lot 2, Block 2, LeParc, for 7:30 PM, August 17, 1982 F. Change Order No. 1, Public Safety Building G. Change Order No. 2, Public Safety/Public Works Building H. Receive petition for improvements to Homeward Hills Road between CSAH 1 and Sunnybrook Road, I.C. 52-003, and authorize preparation of feasibility report (Resolution No. 82-195) MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve items A - H on the Consent Laienoar. Motion carried unanimously. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT FOR EDENVALE APARTMENTS (Resolution No. 82-174) continued from July 20, 1982 City Manager Jullie explained Staff has been working with the applicants on alternatives which the City thought would be appropriate. Dan Nelson, Holmes and Graven law firm, representing Edenvale Apartments Partner- ship, said his firm had been handling the legal side of the proposal. He introduced Steve Cox from Edenvale Apartments Partnership who had been handling the business side of the negotiations. Nelson reviewed what the request included. Cox reviewed details of what has happened over the past eighteen months. They are requesting $100,000 in tax increments in each of the first ten years of the loan. In return they will pay the City $500,000 at the end of the tenth year or they will agree to pay a negotiated interest rate on that $500,000 for an additional period of time. Nelson stated the City would have to create a Housing & Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie before further steps could be taken; the Housing & Redevelopment Authority would then be the official City agency overseeing this project. City Council Minutes -3- August 3, 1982 Cox noted if they were to be detained beyond August 17th there would be problems with their financing and with MUD. Finance Director Frane noted the process is one of negotiation. The develop- ers are under a time constraint; this is subject to further negotiation. Bentley asked what the developer would ultimately be asking for. Nelson said it is confusing because this is a whole new use of tax increment financing which was authorized by the last legislature. Nelson further interpreted the way in which his clients intended to use this financing method. Penzel said the City would be making a rather significant contribution to this project. He stated that while this takes advantage of the legislatively conceived subsidy, it goes farther than he liked. Redpath said the City does not have $500,000 to invest; but are 174 rental units a fair return on the community's investment. He pointed out the need for rental housing in the City and this would help ease that need. Penzel said he would like to see the inducement to the City reexamined. Bentley stated he was involved in the Chamber of Commerce Housing Study. He said he has had an ongoing concern regarding Housing Revenue Bonds and he has an even greater concern about the nature of this entire project. He said he understands the need for rental housing, but would like to see some guidelines established for the use of financing tools available to the City. Nelson noted these are included by State Statute in the Plan. Tangen askad if the City Attorney would comment on the proposal which had been presented. City Attorney Pauly said he had reviewed the proposed Reso- lutions and the plan which had been drafted. He stated he had met with Nelson last week; the plan which was presented at that time did not spell out what the details of the City's participation were -- that would be spelled out in a Developer's Agreement between the HRA and the Developer. Tangen said he was concerned because the Council did not have all the facts before it -- there were too many questions unanswered. He said approval of the HRA would not mean tacit approval of the other steps o if he were to vote in favor of the HRA. Redpath noted the Council had granted industrial revenue bonds and tax incre- ment financing for industrial purposes. This should be taken into considera- tion by the Council. Dick Feerick, 6518 Leesborough Avenue, stated he would be more comfortable with this proposal if City Manager Jullie and Finance Director Frane had more time to study it. Penzel said it has been City policy to provide opportunity for things to happen. It was his feeling the Council should consider favorably the reestablishment of the HRA. However, before taking action on the other portions of the pro- posal, Staff should draft potential guidelines while the proponents reexamine their proposal in light of the concerns of the City. Tangen concurred. City Council Minutes -4- August 3, 1982 MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to adopt Resolution No. 82-174A, a resolution as to the Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to continue the Public Hearing on the question of the Edenvale Housing and Redevelopment Project by the Housing & Redevelopment Authority and the tax increment financing district hearing to August 17, 1982. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to instruct Staff to examine the details of the proposal, to draft guidelines and to look at alternatives in the next two week period and to report back to the Council. Motion carried unanimously. B. REQUEST FOR LIQUOR LICENSE FOR BROTHERS-IN-LAW, INC. dba Boardwalk Restaur- ants, Inc. (formerly Brothers Restaurant at Eden Prairie Center) Charles Schwartz, President of the Boardwalk Restaurants, Inc., addressed the request. He noted the corporation had recently purchased three of the Brothers Restaurants (Maplewood, Burnsville, and Eden Prairie.) This is the last of the three licenses to be "transferred." There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tanen, to close the Public Hearing and to continue consideration of the license to August 17, 1982. Motion carried unanimously. C. KINGS FOREST by Centurion Company. Request for Guide Plan change of approxi- mately 70 acres from low to medium density residential, Planned Unit Development approval of 31 single family and 153 townhouses, rezoning of 15 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 and 33 acres from Rural to RM 6.5, preliminary plat approval over the 70 acres, possible variances from the R1-13.5 and PM 6.5 Districts, and approval of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Located west of Baker Road and Crosstown Baptist Church, south of St. John's Woods, and east of West 66th Street's easterly terminous (Resolution No. 82-187 - Guide Plan Change; Resolution No. 82-188 - PUD; Ordinance No. 82-20 - rezoning; Resolu- tion No. 82-109 - preliminary plat; and Resolution No. 82-190 - EAW) Ron Bastyr, McCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc., and Len Thiel, Centurion Com- pany, were present. Bastyr outlined the proposed development using graphics and reviewed the various proposals which had been discussed for this property. Director of Planning Enger said this item had been considered by the Planning Commission at its June 28, 1982, July 12, 1982, and July 26, 1982, meetings. The Commission voted to recommend approval of the proposal with a recommen- dation that Kings Forest Road be connected to the west, there be no public road connection to the north at St. John's Drive, and there be no connection of West 66th Street to the west. Enger noted the letters from Captain Wall of the Public Safety Department and Phil Mathiowetz, Fire Marshal, in which they each discussed the need for connecting roads in adjoining neighborhoods. C City Council Minutes -5- August 3, 1982 Enger further reviewed the areas where the Planning Commission differed from the Staff Report. Director of Community Services Lambert stated the proposal had been reviewed by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission at its August 2, 1982, meeting and moved to recommend denial of the plan showing the loop road to Baker Road. It recommended approval of the plan showing Kings Forest as an east-west through street with a cul-de-sac running south off that road, west of the Creek. This cul-de-sac is to extend to the West 66th Street right-of- way for a possible future connection to West 66th Street. Also included was approval of multi-family housing on the east side of the cul-de-sac and single-family on the west side contingent on the developer dedicating all the remaining open space adjacent to Forest Hills School/Park and constructing an 8' bikeway adjacent to Kings Forest Road and the southern cul-de-sac exten- sion. Redpath asked if there is a need for Edenvale Boulevard to go through to Baker Road. Penzel said it has been the policy of the City to connect neighborhoods whenever and wherever possible. Enger noted "desire lines" for traffic which would be using these streets; he explained various ways which might be incor- porated for keeping industrial traffic out of the area. Bentley said he felt it was the duty of a proponent to come with a proposal; the duty of Staff and the Commissions would then be to act on that proposal and not to design and redesign. Dick Anderson, 14208 Charing Cross Road, asked how one would get to the park land flail] the school. John Palm, 6389 St. John's Woods, commended Centurion for its work with the neighbors in explaining the proposal during the various phases. Palm said he would prefer to not have a connection from Kings Forest Road to St. John's Drive except for knockdown barriers. He would like to see the Council adopt the Planning Commission's recommendations regarding the other road connections. Cliff Thompson, 6559 Kurtz Lane, expressed concern about traffic on Kurtz Lane and Birch Island Road. He noted the truck traffic which is now using Kurtz Lane in the area where breakaway barriers had been promised last year. Dietz explained some of this traffic is due to road construction projects in the area. David Fisher, 6451 Kurtz Lane, said he is concerned about the long term affect this connection might have. He felt Kurtz Lane might become a major access road from the west if this connection is made. Fisher submitted a petition to close (barricade) Birch Island Road at the point it crosses the Milwaukee Road Railroad tracks which was signed by Kurtz Lane property owners. Penzel indicated Staff would review the petition and report back to the Council at its earliest convenience. Redpath said the Council has been looking at roads in that portion of the City because of the difficulty of getting from one place to another -- this is particularly important in the interest of public safety. City Council Minutes -6- August 3, 1982 Dick Feerick, 6518 Leesborough Avenue, stated he was in favor of the alternate plan. He suggested the Planning Commission and Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission have a joint meeting someday. He did not feel it was necessary to connect the roads between neighborhoods. Lewis Kinne, 6617 Manchester Lane, said he has been a resident at that address for 18 years. He expressed his concern about the West 66th Street connection. He said people like it the way it is and do not want it changed. Hanley Anderson, 6581 Manchester Lane, said the West 66th Street connection has been shown on all maps since he has lived in Eden Prairie; however, this should not imply that the road should be built. He said there are two ques- tions: whether or not to build the street and whether or not to build 180 units. He would like to see a knockdown barrier instead of a street connec- tion at West 66th Street. Woodrow Bjork, 14302 Stratford Road, questioned the credibility of the Planning Commission because of the vote changes made on the decision in regard to West 66th Street. He would not like the West 66th Street connec- tion made because the bad influences are kept out. The residents feel safer because theirs is a limited access area -- it is small enough so the residents know who is in their area and they wish to keep it that way. Penzel stated that the Planning Commission members had expressed they did not know what they were voting on. The tapes did show that the Planning Commission minutes expressed what the Planning Commission had done. linda Ueland. 6924 Canterbury Lane. felt the West 66th Street connection would create unsafe conditions for children who must walk to Forest Hills School. Wayne Gilbertson, 6580 Leesborough Avenue, asked what benefit the West 66th Street connection would be to residents who presently live in the area. He is opposed to the connection; he can see no benefit. Lyle Shaw, 7001 Kingston Drive, said he feels all the streets in the area will be impacted. He is opposed to the West 66th Street connection. Phil Maller, 14202 Stratford Road, said no real need has been identified for the West 66th Street access. He felt the area does not need the extra traffic which will be generated. He is opposed. Dick Eisch, 6629 Manchester Lane, said he lives on a dead end and has not had any problems with emergency access. He noted that many residents in the area had purchased their homes because of its secluded nature. Ken Nelson, 6600 Leesborough Avenue, said he is against the West 66th Street connection. He felt the traffic would increase greatly if this connection were made. Roger Sandvick, 14280 Stratford Road, said he is opposed to the connection. R. C. Hahnfeldt, 6650 Leesborough Avenue, said he is opposed to the connection. Hon F City Council Minutes -7- August 3, 1982 Tangen said it appeared there is more than one issue under consideration. He felt it should be referred back to the Planning Commission so it could look at the second alternative. He felt the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission had recognized a problem in the plan which came from the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission should have the oppor- tunity to examine the proposal in light of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission's recommendations. Because there are so very few inter- connections of the road system, there is an even greater impact on the system as a whole. Tangen said residents should take into consideration that not everyone lives on a cul-de-sac and this should be carefully looked at -- the people who live on cul-de-sacs must go past someone's home to get to where they are going -- and these are the residents who are affected. Redpath said the Council must not be parochial. It mug look at 36 square miles in which there are two east/west streets -- Highway 5 and County Road 1; and two north/south streets -- Baker Road and Highway 4. The Council must provide a way for residents to move within those 36 square miles and, while the comments of the residents are important, the total picture must be considered. Bentley said he believes in connecting streets in neighborhoods, if public safety purposes benefit. He did not see where there is any benefit here. He felt the street width is too narrow and would create a public safety haz- ard in the connection of Kings Forest Road to St. John's Drive. He would like to have this go back to the Plannirg Commission for further review. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to send the proposal back to the Planning Commission for its review of the alternative plan and to continue the Public Hearing to August 17, 1982. Tangen further directed the Planning Commission to look at one connection to the west through Kings Forest as being essential so that a long cul-de- sac is not created. Penzel asked that Kings Forest Road be looked at as proceeding westerly to connect with Edenvale Boulevard. He would suggest that the West 66th Street and St. John's Drive connections be looked at as pedestrian access points with knockdown barriers for emergency vehicles. Redpath called the question. Vote failed (2-2.) Bentley asked that the Shoreland Management Ordinance be examined also to see if this is in conformance. VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously. D. EDEN PRAIRIE PARTNERSHIP by Undestad Investment Company. Request for a Planned Unit Development Concept approval for industrial uses on 32 acres (27 acres of which is zoned 1-2), rezoning from Rural to 1-2 for approxi- mately 5 acres, preliminary plat approval of 6 lots and 3 outlots, possible variances from the 1-2 District, and approval of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of County Road 67 and Chicago Northwestern Railway (Resolution No. 82-191 - PUD; Ordinance No. 82-21 - rezoning; Resolution No. 82-192 - preliminary plat; and Resolution No. 82-193 - EAW) City Council Minutes -8- August 3, 1982 John Shardlow and Geoff Martin of Howard Dahlgren and Associates and Norm Undestad a partner in the development were present. Shardlow made the presentation of the proposal. He noted that Franklin National Bank is fee owner of the property. Planning Director Enger stated this item had been before the Planning Commission at its June 14, 1982, and July 12, 1982, meetings. He noted the process had been a difficult one for the Commission because of the variables on the southern most portion of the plan. Enger reviewed the action taken by the Planning Commission. Director of Community Services Lambert said the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission (4 members present) had reviewed this at its June 21, 1982, meeting. The plan which was approved did not have an east/west collector. It recommended an east/west trail and a southerly trail connection to Canterbury Lane. Shardlow stated when he started working with this developer one of the conditions was that the east/west residential collector be proposed as Shardlow felt very strongly that it was needed. He pointed out that if all through streets were put up to a straw vote in a neighborhood, there would not be any through streets. He feels the transitions they have come up with are acceptable. Penzel asked what Shardlow's position was towards the potential residential use of the portion abutting Manchester Lane and the office use of that abutting Stratford Road. Shardlow said he did not feel the office site is a good use of that property. He felt the single family off the end of Manchester Lane is possible and is a workable solu- tion which has some problems which have to be worked out. Bentley asked City Attorney Pauly about the expansion of non-conforming land uses. Pauly said it is not permitted. Penzel asked if there had been any expansion at the Bury site. City Manager Jullie said Staff had field checked this and there had been no new buildings on the site. Redpath said an east/west connection would improve the marketability of the industrial use which is one of the alternatives. Roger Sandvick, 14280 Stratford Road, noted a letter of August 2, 1982, which he had sent to the Mayor and Council (copy is attached to these Minutes.) He stated he felt an office condominium is the best transitional use. He felt an industrial use would have an adverse affect on his property value due to the noise and additional traffic from trucks. He noted his letter contained three recommendations. He felt the zoning ordinance will be violated if this is allowed as proposed. City Attorney Pauly noted that 261/2 acres under consideration have been zoned industrial for a long time and the Council should take this into consideration. I h City Council Minutes -9- August 3, 1982 Woodrow Bjork, 14302 Stratford Road, said he concurred with Sandvick's letter. He stated he had met with Dahlgren representatives and had discussed use of the southern parcel. He felt this is a malleable issue. Dick Feerick, 6518 Leesborough Avenue, said he liked what the developer is attempting to do relative to the transition. He would not like to see the cul-de-sac extended. Phil Maller, 14202 Stratford Road, said he has found the developer to be fairly flexible and willing to work with the neighbors. Bob Hoel, 6510 Manchester Lane, said he would like to see the lines of transition extended to 200; he could live with that. Penzel said it was his inclination that there should be a reasonable buffer, an east/west street connection to Kings Forest Road in the Centurion parcel, and that an office condominium building might not be the most valid use of the site south of the east/west road. He recommended the Council refer the matter back to the Planning Commission and continue the Public Hearing to August 17th. Shardlow said the rights of the adjacent landowner must be considered; he felt the 200 buffer to be more than is included in any ordinance in the Metropolitan area. He said that specific proposals for each site would be before the various Commissions and the Council prior to final approval at which time modifications could be made; the action requested tonight was for PUD concept approval. He further explained the position he was in regarding the approval which had been given by the Planning Commission in wnich there was no east/west connection and which action had been a part of the agreement between the Undestad Invest- ment Company and Franklin National Bank. Bentley said he was not satisfied with the proposal in its present form. Tangen said he would like to see how this proposal integrates with the pre- vious proposal which was heard this evening. He felt it should be referred back to the Planning Commission. He would recommend the Planning Commission look at the two proposals together. Redpath said he agreed with what had been said. He felt there must be an east/west connector and a buffer between the residential property and the development to the north. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to continue the Public Hearing to August 17, 1982, and to refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission. Motion carried unanimously. VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 2954 - 3161 MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Payment of Claims Nos. 2954 - 3161. Roll call vote: Bentley, Redpath, Tangen, and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes -10- August 3, 1982 VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS There were no reports. VIII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 1-82, adopting the City Code MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Bentley, to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 1-82, adopting the City Code. Motion carried unanimously. IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Tangen - stated he had seen the play "Oliver" and thought the Commission which sponsored it should be commended. MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to commend the Historical & Cultural Commission for sponsoring the Eden Prairie Community Theatre. Motion carried unanimously. Penzel - suggested the name of the Historical & Cultural Commission be changed to reflect its involvement in the Fine Arts. MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to request the Historical & Cultural Commission to change its nc.me to the Historical & Fine Arts Commission. Motion carried unanimously. B. Report of City Manager There was no report. C. Report of City Attorney There was no report. D. Report of Director of Public Works 1. Award contract for West 69th Street and Vicinity Drainage Improvements, I.C. 52-0047Pe—so1ution No. 82-196) Director of Public Works Dietz summarized the bids for the project. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to adopt Resolution No. 82-196, awarding the contract for West 69th Street and Washington Avenue drainage improvements. Roll call vote: Bentley, Redpath, Tangen, and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes -11- August 3, 1982 2. Award contract for Mitchell Lake Estates 2nd Improvements, I.C. 52-026 (Resolution No. 82-199) Director of Public Works Dietz reviewed this project. MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No. 82-199, awarding the contract for Mitchell Lake Estates 2nd Addition Improvements. Roll call vote: Bentley, Redpath, Tangen and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 3. Authorization of easement acquisition by eminent domain Director of Public Works Dietz spoke to the necessity for this action in conjunction with the Schooner Boulevard Project. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt Resolution No. 82-197, authorizing and directing the acquisition of certain lands by eminent domain. Roll call vote: Bentley, Redpath, Tangen and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. X. NEW BUSINESS A. Meeting with Planning Commission MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Penzel, to schedule a Joint Meeting of the Planning Commission and the City Council for 6 p.m. on Tuesday, August 17, 1982, prior to the Regular Meeting of the City Council. Motion carried unanimously. B. Redpath noted that Cliff Thompson and Tony Hirt have donated and hooked up a used air conditioner for the Senior Citizen Center. He recommended a letter be sent to them thanking them, on behalf of the Council, for this. XI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Redpth moved, seconded by Tangen, to adjourn the meeting at 11:44 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. 1100-5 The following items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk as attachments to the August 3, 1982, Minutes of the City Council: 1. A Petition to Close (Barricade) Birch Island Road at the Point It Crosses the Milwaukee Road Railroad Tracks. Sub- mitted by the Kurtz Lane Property Owners. 2. Letter to the Mayor and City Council Members from Roger W. Sandvick, 14280 Stratford Road, Re: Eden Prairie Partnership Industrial Planned Unit Development Concept for the Undestad Investment Company. nooK UNAPPROVED MINUTES JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1982 6:00 NI, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath and George Tangen PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chairman William Bearman, Virginia Gartner, Bob Hallett, Dennis Marhula, Elizabeth Retterath, Grant Sutliff and Hakon Torjesen PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Planning Director Chris Enger, Director of Public Works Euguene A. Dietz, Director of Community Services Bob Lambert, City Attorney Roger Pauly, and Recordin:, Secretary Karen Michael ROLL CALL: all were present I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Penzel, to approve the Agenda as published. Motion carried unanimously. II. COMPREHENSIVE GUICE PLAN - a blueprint for "planned gowth" A. NEED FOR GROWTH B. PLAN FOR GROWTH 1. Street System 2. Land Uses a. Balance between open space, housing and business b. Balance of housing type and opportunity Penzel noted the above had been presented as a stimulus for thought and would not necessarily be discussed in order given. He said the reason for the Joint Meeting between the Planning Commission and the City Council was because the Mayor and City Council felt there was the appearance that the two bodies were drifting apart. It was felt there was a need for communication on the City's position as to the policies under which it operates and the precepts under which it works. Penzel stated he had discussed the mode of operation of the Planning Commission with Chairman Bearman in light of concerns which had been raised by residents. Penzel said he had asked the City Attorney to make available a City Attorney to sit in on Planning Commission Meetings for the next few months to provide the necessary expertise on rules of procedure, if the Planning Commis- sion members so request. - Joint Meeting: Council/Planning -2- August 17, 1982 Bearman said the Planning Comnission noted neighborhood problems and concerns are different from area to area and some times do not match community goals. Penzel said he believed this to be self interest on the part of a few rather than the broader interest of the neighborhood. At times the neighborhood's general interest was not represented at all. Bearman said the City must develop a transportation plan for the community. Bentley stated the issue at the moment is that of connecting neighborhoods. He said from reading the Planning Commission minutes he sees the Planning Commission as a scientific body which, based on scientific criteria such as the City's Ordinances and the Guide Plan objectives, reviews a proposal and makes recommendations based on that criteria -- staying out of the political realm (i.e. responding to the needs of a particular group.) Dearman said he would tend to agree with that assessment with the addition of a couple of items: the Planning Commission interprets those criteria and, because of the broad base of the Commission, varying views are expressed in interpreting those criteria. Torjesen said the Planning Commission does not always have guidelines as to how to interpret what comes before them. The Commission has to be more than scientific -- it is made up of honest citizens who call it the way they see it. Gartner said if a Public Hearing is called for then the citizens should be listened to and heard. Penzel reviewed some of the confusion which was expressed by the Council and which resulted in the necessity for this meeting. Penzel stated the minutes reflect what happened at the meeting. Torjesen said the Commission must pay more attention to the minutes. He noted that Commission members pride themselves on the ability to have others change their minds. This at times creates some contusion or adds to it. Sutliff said proponents should be requested to show more than just the area they are dealing with so the Commission would have a better idea as to what the effect will be on surrounding properties. Edstrom said he would advocate that. Tangen said City Staff should be responsible for this; Staff should cooperate with the developer to do this. Sutliff noted a recent problem he had where he needed assistance from Public Safety. Public Safety was "locked up" in a neighborhood and the response time was longer than it might have been had neighborhoods been connected. Retterath said she felt the developer had an obligation to furnish the Commission with the information he had regarding the surrounding area -- he may have more information at that point than the City has. Marhula said there are two methods of review used by the Commission: one is from a city planning standpoint and the other from a City planning standpoint. The Commission's tendency is to look at it more from the city planning standpoint. Hallett noted the problems in dealing with adjoining proposals when they are not addressed jointly or related to each other. Redpath said the consequences of the actions should be explained by Staff to the City Council and the Planning Conmission (i.e. the impact on sewer and water facilities and the plans which were made for this and other public facilities.) it)01 Joint Meeting: Council/Planning -3- August 17, 1982 Penzel said regarding the "Need for Growth", whether we personally think it is a desirable thing or not, all of the financing presently in place for public utilities (i.e. sewer and water) was premised on substantial continued growth until at least the year 2000. Gartner said then the City should only look at devilopers who are not asking for additional sewer and water facilities. She saia she had been told by Staff that there is no need for forced growth. Redpath asked if there was any way to find out the impact in the reduction of the number of units in The Preserve. City Manager Jullie said assessment rates were projected on a connection rate of 400 - 600 units per year. Up to this point the City has done very well. Jullie said the concern now is the type of housing which is being built -- there is less single-family and more multiple-family housing. Torjesen asked if projections might be available as to the costs of paying for sewer and water facilities -- i.e. if growth is less than projected, and rore than projected, what would it do to the tax bills? The implications of growth should be addressed. Redpath suggested a seminar for Commissions and the Council at which time basic questions might be answered. Tangen noted the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission had not seen the projects until they had been seen by the Planning Commission and the City Council -- this had not always been the case, but in several instances the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission has had a positive impact on what has ultimately been proposed. He suggested perhaps the Planning Commission and the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission hear major proposals at the same time. He felt the Parks, Recration & Natural Resources Commission should see the proposals earlier on in the process -- the night before a Council meeting is sometimes too late oecause it precludes any interchange between Commissions before the proposal comes to the Council. Director of Planning Enger said the procedure was requested by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission because changes were often requested by the Planning Commission and these were then reflected in the proposal brought before the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission. Bearman said more proposals are being presented which need a great deal of review -- the Commission can get hung up on any one issue from PUD to rezoning. He wonders if Staff even has enough time to adequately review these proposals because during the past year or two there have been so many. Torjesen said he has commented from time to time that certain proposals should not have come before the Commission but that Staff, he felt, had been pressured into bringing them. Penzel requested Finance Director Frane to prepare a report on the concerns raised this evening. He said City Manager Jullie had asked Jim Clark from the Public Safety Department and Phil Mathiowetz, Fire Marshal, to discuss public safely access between neighborhuods and the need for connections between neighborhoods. Jim Clark said it is very frustrating to be within view of a place to which a call is to be made and yet have to drive five miles to get there. He said a life might be saved if connections were to be made between neighborhoods. Phil Mathiowetz said it is hard to figure out addresses at 3 a.m. Cul-de-sacs present a problem just due to their length in some cases. Single access to a neighborhood is bad -- it is difficult to get equipment in and out. A single access which is blocked by one type of emergency vehicle or emergency can delay or preclude accessibility to another emergency. 1101 Joint Meeting: Council/Planning -4- August 17, 1982 Enger said a consensus on minor roads should be developed. There are over 400 cul-de-sacs in the City and the Public Works Department would like to see restrictions on further development because they are hard to maintain. Enger said he had discussed the response time situation with Director of Public Safety Hacking who told him the response time is low now because police officers take police cars home with them and respond to emergency calls during off-duty hours. Access into and out of an area is crucial from a life/safety standpoint. Torjesen said he felt people like to live on cul-de-sacs; in nice, little, small neighborhoods. He felt it was the job of the Planning Commission to provide these for the residents. Hallett noted the dialogue tonight had been helpful to him as a relatively new member of the Planning Commission. Retterath felt that the good of the City is not as important as the views of the people. She thought the best interests of the City should be the concern of the City Council. Tangen said while he lives on a cul-de-sac he can see a real need for two ways in and out of a neighborhood and interconnections between neighborhoods. Tangen said he would like to make a recommendation to the Planning Commission expressing the Council's desire to have neighborhoods connected by road systems. Bearman said there were lots of people in Eden Prairie who thought this was going to be a bedroom community without a lot of industrial and commercial development. He thought it might be a good idea to clarify that. III. PLANNING COMMISSION'S ROLE, CITY COUNCIL'S ROLE Bentley said we should be aiming at long-range goals. He does not think the Planning Commission or the City Council should redesign the developer's plans for an area; minor modifications could be made during meetings, but anything major should be redone by the developer and presented at another time. Edstrom felt the relationship between the Council and the Planning Commission during his term on the Council has been very good. IV. BALANCING THE NEEDS AND DESIRES OF A NEIGHBORHOOD AGAINST OVERALL COMMUNITY NEEDS AND DESIRES Bearman noted that six or seven issues were raised during the codification process which the Planning Commission would like to address. Tangen said he thought these would be looked at once the process is completed. City Attorney Pauly noted there have been few substantive changes in the zoning ordinance since he has been City Attorney; it might be valuable to reexamine portions of the ordinance in the near future. Bentley asked that another Joint Meeting of the Planning Commission and City Council be held soon. V. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 p.m. 1'10 ADOPTED by the City Council on September 7, 1982. Waf§ang H. Penzel, Mayor September 7, 1982 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN'COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. R82-216 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF CARDINAL CREEK .4th ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Cardinal Creek 4th Addition has been sub- mitted in the manner required for platting land •nder the Eden Prairie Or d i n a n c e Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceeding s h a v e b e e n duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesot a a n d o r d i n - ances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat Approval Request for Cardinal Creek 4th Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's Report on this plat dated August 30, 1982. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Regis- trar of Titles for their use as required by NSA 462.358, Subd. 3. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute . the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon com- pliance with the foregoing provisions. ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 17a CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager . Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: David Olson, Engineering Technician DATE: August 30, 1982 SUBJECT: Cardinal Creek 4th Addition PROPOSAL: The developer, Cardinal Creek Associates, has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Cardinal Creek 4th Addition. The plat consists of one lot (RI-13.5) ane is a replat of Outlot B and Lot 4, Block 3, Cardinal Creek. HISTORY: The preliminay plat was approved by the City Council on May 18, 1982, per Rei.olution No. R82-101. Drainaae and utility easements encumbering the parcel vacated by the City Council on May 18, 1982, per Resolution No. 82-115. Proper easements have been dedicated on the new plat. Zoning to RI-13.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on May 15, 1979, per Ordinance No. 79-05. . The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report and applying to this plat was executed on May 15, 1979. VARIANCES: Variance requests not allowed through the Developer's Agreement must be approved by the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal utilities and streets have been installed in conformance with City Standards. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. BONDING: Municipal utilities and streets have been installed, therefore, bonding will not be required. 113 Pg. 2 Final Plat Cardinal Creek 4th RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Cardinal Creek 4th Addition subject to the requirementsof this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: 1. Receipt of fee for City Engineering Services in the amount of $30.00. mo t/ p . MEMO • TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager . FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works DATE: September 1, 1982 SUBJECT: Petition for improvements, Golden Strip East Included on the September 7, 1982, agenda is a 100% petition for local improvements contained in the Golden Strip East subdivision. The owner has submitted this petition in order to comply with a Developer's Agreement requiring submittal of this document prior to release of the final plat for recording purposes. The property owner does not wish to proceed with improvements at this time, but has asked that the petition be held until the development plans are more finalized. Recommend approval. EAD:sg I ig START OF RETAKE The images appearing between this point and the End of Retake target are true, accurate, and complete copies of records that previously were not filmed or were filmed incorrectly. MEMO TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works DA1E: September 1, 1982 SUBJECT: Petition for improvements, Golden Strip East Included on the September 7, 1982, agenda is a 100% petition for local improvements contained in the Golden Strip East subdivision. The owner has submitted this petition in order to comply with a Developer's Agreement requiring submittal of this document prior to release of the final plat for recording purposes. The property owner does not wish to proceed with improvements at this time, but has asked that the petition be held until the development plans are more finalized. Recommend approval. EAD:sg r1 O F. • END OF RETAKE September 7, 1982 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO.R82-218 RESOLUTION RECEIVING. 100% PETITION FOR GOLDEN STRIP EAST BE IT RESOLVED of the Eden Prairie City Council: 1. The owners of 100% of the real property abutting upon and to be benefitted from the proposed street and utility improvements at an estimated total cost of $350,000 have petitioned the City Council to construct said improvements and to assess the entire cost against their property. 2. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3 and upon recommendation of the City Engineer, said petition is hereby received. The City Engineer is hereby authorized to proceed with design of the improvements upon receipt of final development plan. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk — X Waterm'ain _ — X Store Sewer •• X Street%Pa ,ling ' Other ' Sanitary Sewer : Golden SttilLEat 11 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE; MINNESOTA 100% PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EDEN PRAIRIE C1T/ COUNCIL: ' 91 The undersigned are all the fee owners of t h e r e a l p r o p e r t y d e s c r i b e d below and herein petition for the Eden Pra i r i e C i t y C o u n c i l t o p r o c e e d with making the following described .imprOvements: (General Location) Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031,. Subd. 3, the und e r s i g n e d h e r e b y w a i v e a n y public hearing to be held on said improvem e n t s , a n d f u r t h e r s t a t e a n d . agree that the total cost of said improvem e n t s s h a l l b e s p e c i a l l y a s - sessed against the property described below i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e City's special assessment policies. We fur t h e r u n d e r s t a n d t h a t t h e preliminary, estimated total cost for the said i m p r o v e m e n t s i s $ 3 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 Street Address or other Legal Description of Property to be Served Golden Strip_East. Names and addresses of Petitioners (Must be owners of record) (kmdonINaegele Realty /151 Flying_Cloltd_Drive Eden PrairieMN 553_44 Richard F. Condon, Partn• (For City Use) Date Received flosarr 21/9j7 Project No. Couikil Consideration 11 VI September 7, 1982 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. R82-220 RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION of 1982 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLS AND SETTING HEARING DATE WHEREAS, contracts have been let for the following listed improvements and the total project cost, including expenses incurred, or to be incurred and the City's share, exclusive of that assignable to City property, are established as shown on the attached Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. The cost of such improvements to be specially assessed are hereby declared to be those as set forth in Exhibit A. 2. The City Clerk with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be assessed for each improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the office of the Deputy City Clerk for public inspection. 3. A hearing shall be held on the 21 day of September, 1982, in the City Hall at 7:30 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessments and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessments. 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessments to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of record of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 7, 1982. . Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Franc, Clerk nil EXHIBIT A 1982 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS PROJECT TOTAL COST 1. I.C. 51-308 A & C, 51-340A & 51-398 Street Improvements on 3 phases of N/A the Schooner Boulevard/Valley View Road Major Center Area Road System. 2. I.C. 51-331 Sanitary Sewer, Watermain and Street $ 216,052.53 Improvements on Franlo Road from Preserve Boulevard to 900 feet west of Preserve Boulevard. CITY FUNDS AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED N/A $2,526,470.00 $ 216,052.53 3. I.C. 51-375 Storm Sewer and Street Improvements in the Creekview Estates Plat. $ 116,462.75 $ 116,462.75 4. I.C. 51-381 Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer and Street Improvements for Sunnybrook Road between Homeward Hills Road and Olympic Hills 6th Addition 5. I.C. 51-409 Drainage and Sanitary Sewer Improvements $ 80,090.81 in Valley Place Office Park. $ 7,539.40 (Trunks) $ 176,928.15 $ 8,722.00 (Trunks) $ 4,000 Homestead Credit $ 172,928.15 $ 8,722.00 (Trunks) $ 80.090.81 $ 7,539.40 (Trunks) 6. I.C. 52-001 Watermain, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer and Street Improvements on Bennett Place between Pioneer Trail and Blossom Road. $ 169,915.59 $ 5,099.30 (Trunks) $ 1,000 Homestead Credit $ 166,915.59 $ 5,099.30 (Trunks) $ 40,074.40 $ 6,409.00 Watermain/ $ 31,745.40 Storm Sewer $ 2,080.00 (Trunks) $ 4,000.00 Homestead Credit $ 874,093.79 $ 874,093.79 $ 2,080.00 (Trunks) Pg. 2 Exhibit A, 1982 Special Assessments PROJECT TOTAL COST 7. I.C. 52-004 $ 45,316.44 Storm Sewer Improvements in"the area bounded by Shady Oak Road, West 69th Street, Washington Avenue and Valley View Road. 8. I.C. 52-007 Storm Sewer Improvements north of Martin $ 50,275.88 Drive between Commerce Way and Corporate Way. 9. I.C. 52-013 Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer $ 118,457.57 and Street Improvements on Kilmer Avenue and Atherton Way, $ 11,430.00 (Trunks) 10. I.C. 52-016A' Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer $ 155,573.95 and Street Improvements in the Autumn Woods Plat. CITY FUNDS AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $ 45,316.44 $ 50.275.88 $ 107,457.57 C! $ 11,430.00 (Trunks) $ 154,634.49 $11.000 Homestead Credit $ 939.46 11. I.C. 52-017 Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer and Street Improvements on the south end of Mariann Drive. 12. I.C. 52-025 Utilities and Bridge Improvements in the City West Development. 13. I.C. 52-031 Drainage and Street Improvements on West 76th Street west of Washington Avenue. $ 50,810.06 $ 50,810.06 Pg. 3 Exhibit A, 1982 Special Assessements PROJECT 14. Trunk Sewer and Water 15. Lateral Sewer and Water 16. I.C. 51-260 Ring Road Deferments 17. Tree Removal TOTAL COST N/A N/A N/A N/A CITY FUNDS N/A N/A N/A N/A AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $ 165,756.52 $ 25,664.78 $ 4,748.40 695.00 TOTAL $2,128,742.62 $27,348.46 $ 4,826,988.86 .NA-0WCO.02 161_12101M ' Flev.10/81 DEPARTMENT OF License Number LICENSE TO CROSS PUBLIC WATERS 144-65-987 NAIURAI RESOURCES -his license is issued under authority and subject to the limitations in M.S. 84.415, and Minnesota Regulations NR 5100, 5101, and 5102, to the Licensee as named and for the fee and term as specified below. Name of Licensee City of Eden Prairie Address (Street, ft Fm), Box el, City, State, Zip Code) 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie MN 55344 License Fee One hundred Twenty and no/100 DOLLARS ) (S Tem) Iyears) 25 Dfc.ctive Date October 1, 1981 _ Termination Date September 30, 2006 Purpose of License — Construction, Mainundme and Operation or a: Liquid Pipeline maunder said waters. and the covenants and agreements of the licensee to use the following described waters: Various descriptions as shown on the attached application and on plats attached to previous licenses (previous license numbers are listed on the attached application) all of which are made a part hereof, This license is granted subject to the following Provisions: 1. At the end of the license period if both parties wish to renew, the renewal fee and time period will be determined by such methods as are developed by the Commissioner of Natural Resources. 2. This license shall be cancelable upon reasonable notice by the Commissioner for substantial violation of its terms, or if at any time its continuance will conflict with a public use of water over or upon which it is granted, or for any other cause. 3. The licensee shall remove all its structures and other property from and vacate said waters within ninety 190) days after receipt of such notice, or the termination of this license for any cause, and any such structures and other property not removed within such period shall become the absolute property of the State. 4. The licensee shall comply with all laws, regulations and municipal ordinances affecting said water or the area in which they are situated and keep them in a neat and orderly condition, and shall remove all refuse and debris that may accumulate thereon. The licensee must also comply with all rules, regulations and requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and other federal, state or local agencies. The project hereunder shall at all times during and after construction be SO*.CI to inspection by the Commissioner or his authorized agent and for that purpose the licensee shall grant access to the premises at all reasonable times. 5. The use of these waters by the licensee in constructing or maintaining the lines for which this license is granted shall be subject to the use, sale, or leasing for mineral or other legal purposes. 6. This license is subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 84.415 and Minnesota Regulations NR 5100, 5101, and 5102. All standards of NR 5102 are incorporated as terms and conditions of this license, except such variations as are identified anti explained in the license application, plans, arid specifications which are attached and made part of the terms and conditions of this license by reference. The licensee shall not deviate from the terms and conditions of this license unless he has first obtained peimission from the Commissioner of Natural Resources. This license is permissive only. No liability shall be iinpoSecf upon or incurred by the State of Minnesota or any of its officers, agents, Or employees, officially or personally, on account of the granting hereof or err account of any damage to any person or property resulting Intim any act ot omission of the licensee or any of its agents, employees or contractors relating to any matter hereunder. This license shall riot be construed as estopping or limiting any legal claims or right of action of any person other than the State against the licensee, its agents, employees, or contractors for any damage or injury resulting from any such act or omission, or nv estol i ning or ilntlilltg rillY !etlal (Jinni or right of oction of the Stale against the licensee, its agents, employees, or contractors, for violation of or failure to c. with thy provloo, rf the license or applicable provisions of law. B. This license shall not be assignable except upon written consent of the State by its proper officers and shall be binding upur ,:: successor, assigns, heirs, and legal representatives of the parties hereto. 9. No delay by the State in enforcing any of the conditions of this license shall operate as 8 waiver of any of its rights and the vic, tion or any of the conditions hereof shall be cause for revocation of this license. 10. In oyercrOSsingi of public waters, lines shall have a minimum clearance of 25 feet above extreme high water, unless otherM specified. ,In undercrossings of public waters at locations where the water is ordinarily less than six feet in depth, lines or pipes shall be plac- in trenches and backfilled so as to provide a minimum cover of two feet below the natural bottom. 12. Undercrossings shall be marked by signs on the banks at points where the line enters and leaves the stream or lake. 13. The beds of the waters described above shall, upon completion of construction or maintenance operations therein, be restored . nearly as practicable to their original cross•section. Erosion control measures 'shall be practiced to stabilize the banks. lThr-, necessary to prevent erosion, strcambeds shall be riprapped with natural rock having an average diameter of 12 inches. 14. This license is subject to any SPECIAL PROVISIONS indicated below: roved and Acknowledged Name of LicenseeIs) Signature by: Title Signature by. Title STATE Of MINNESOTA COMMISSIONER OF NATURAL RESOURCES Commissioner's Name Authorized Signature Title CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT To The Eden Prairie City Council: The undersigned property owners herein petition the Ede n P r a i r i e C i t y Council to consider making the following ,describeclimprovements(s): s (General Location) X Sanitary Sewer Anderson Lakes Parkway X Watermain X Storm Sewer extension from Hwy. 169 West to Mitchell Road Street Paving X Other Street Address or Other Legal Description of Property to be Served 12 1 Y‘E" c%,cscic 1177",-/67i 2/,/417 Pik11)- r5 or Pa/iia • r,d4-.5,-,vot 4/1,1. Names of Petitioners (Must Be Property Owners) r th we fy_41-r) 4.1-1 -:73:1-1- Ob. e.2157‘ -411dth .4 (For City Use) Date Received Eit -Jolt Project No. <s-a-03.5 Council Consideration 978L I September 7, 1982 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION pi0. R82-219 • RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY BETWEEN MITCHELL ROAD AND TH 169 AND AUTHORIZE THE PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed to make the following improvements; I.C. 52-035, Anderson Lakes Parkway extension from Hwy.169 west to Mitchell Road for utility and street improvements and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: That tie proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study with the assistance of Rieke, Carroll, and Muller Assoc. and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and presented to the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment and feasi- bility of the proposed improvements. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 7, 1982. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk I. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST September 7, 1982 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) Lambin Construction Merle Nordeen Construction, Inc. Sussman Construction Co. CONTRACTOR:11 & 2 FAMILY) Builders & Rebuilder Goodwin Builders, Inc. Bruce Miller Construction Ken Roelofs Construction, Inc. Tampa, Inc. HEATING & VENTILATING Hoov-Aire, Inc. Independent Sheet Metal Co. Snell Mechanical, Inc. SEPTIC SYSTEMS Shiloh Service Co. REFUSE HAULER R & W Sanitation These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. Pat Solie, Licensing rig° pa.• MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services / DATE: September 2, 1982 SUBJECT: Resolution No. 82-215 Community Services staff requests the City Council to approve Resolution 82-215 authorizing the City to pay the Department of Natural Resources $25 for a ten year lease that provides an easement for a trail crossing of the DNR access to Staring Lake. By State law the DNR cannot grant any lease wjthout "fair compensation". The hard 3urface bicycle trail will be within the easement of Research Road; however, the cross country ski trail and a possible equestrian trail will need this trail easement. BL:md CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 'RESOLUTION NO. 82-215 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LEASE AGREEMENT FOR TRAIL AROUND ST A R I N G L A K E WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie is ikthe process of deve l o p i n g S t a r i n g Lake Community Park, and WHEREAS, a portion of that park plan includes a hard surfa c e t r a i l a n d a cross country ski trail around the lake, and WHEREAS, it is necessary that this trail cross a portion o f t h e D N R p u b l i c access located adjacent to Research Road, and • WHEREAS, the Department of Natural Resources requires a le a s e a g r e e m e n t for any use of State land. 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Eden Pra i r i e d o e s a p p r o v e payment of $25 for a ten year lease for use of this proper t y f o r p u b l i c t r a i l purposes. ADOPTED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie this day of 1982. Wafgang. H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Franc, Clerk SEAL rid MEMORANDUM TO: THRU: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Carl Jullie, City Manager Stephen Sullivan, Park Planner September 2, 1982 Frani° Road Sidewalk Concrete Work Fp. On Tuesday, August 31, 1982, staff received, opened and publicly read bids for placing a S' wide concrete sidewalk along Franlo Road. Bids are as follows: Robert W. Compton, Inc. $9.90/Sq. Yd. Approximate square yardage for project is 1,055, for a project price of $10,449.99. Staff has reviewed last year quotes for comparison, due to the lack nf bids and has found the price to be fair and competitive. Sta:f requests Council approval of the project bid. The grading for this project is by a separate contractor. Estimated total c o s t of this sidewalk was $20,000. Actual project cost to the City will be appro x - imately $15,000. SS*:md MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services FROM: Stephen Calhoon, Park Planner DATE: September 1, 1982 SUBJECT: County Road 1 Bike Trail from County Road 4 .to Cedar Forest Road On Tuesday, August 31, 1982, staff received, opened a n d p u b l i c l y r e a d b i d s for grading and construction of trail base. Bids are a s f o l l o w s : Ingram Excavation, Inc. $10,522 Widmer Bros., Inc. 11,400 Staff recommends the Council accept the low bid of $1 0 , 5 2 2 b y I n g r a m E x c a v a t i o n , Inc. Construction is scheduled to begin September 1 3 t h . A s p h a l t f o r t h e t r a i l will be installed by City crews. Estimated total cos t f o r t h i s s e c t i o n o f t r a i l is $25,000. SC:md .1 rig0 • I. MEMO TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: RE: Carl Jullie Jean Johnson, Assistant Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning September 1, 1982 Administration of C.D.B.G. Rehabilitation Program Because of the development request loads, BFI monitoring, special studies, etc., our department does not have the time to adiminister the home improvement grants. Although Eden Prairie does not process a large number of grants, the inquiries and the review process of applicants to determine eligibility does take considerable time. For example, correspondence to employers, banks, welfare department, mortgage company, and Hennepin County offices all must be done in each instance to verify information submitted by applicants. This correspondence, follow-up to speed up responses, and determination of what improvements are warranted, take up a considerable amount of the Planning Department's time. Hennepin County does administer grants for other communities. Their cost to us would be 7% of the C.D.B.G. allocation of $5,000-$350. This would be more cost effective for the City. Our department would still answer basic questions from residents and then we would refer them to the person at the County handling Eden Prairie's grants. CE:sh 1121 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 82-214 A RESOLUTION REQUESTING HENNEPIN COUNTY TO ADMINISTER C.D.B.G REHABILITATION PROGRAM BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota requests that Hennepin County, as the responsible Urban Hennepin County COBG recipient, administer the Housing Rehabilitation Grant Program withir the City as approved through and funded by the Urban Hennepin County CDBG program, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota authorizes the use by Hennepin County of seven percent of the Urban Hennepin County CDBG entitlement amant approved for expenditure within the City for the purpose of providing housing rehab- ilitation grants to reimburse the County for related administrative expenses effective September 1, 1982. The question was on the adoption of the resolution, and upon a vote being duly taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and, the following voted against the same: WHEREUPON SAID RESOLUTION WAS DECLARED DULY PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 1982. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL (0 2 Minutes - Parks, Recreation & unapproved Natural Resources Commission -2- MEMBERS ABSENT: Marty Jessen a. Arbor Glen Dick Ferrick, Rick Bury and Howard Kilo were present on behalf of the developers. Kilo proceeded with the presentation. Kilo said the developer is requesting PhD Approval of 40.3 acres for 51 single family detached homes and 28 single family attached homes (townhouses). The property is located at the northeast corner of Baker Road and Valley View Road. The developer will phase the project with single family built first. Kingrey asked if the diagonal road planned through the project would invite shortcut traffic from Baker or Valley View Roads? Kilo said this is a concern and a stop sign may have to be put in if this presents a problems. Kingrey said there are extensive berms planned along Baker and Valley View Roads and how will the sidewalks be graded to maintain the berms? Lambert said a pathway can be worked in and he would recommend not.cutting back on the berms. Bury said if the City is concerned with the sidewalks infringing on the berms, perhaps the sidewalk should be put in on the south side of Valley View? Lambert indicated that no detailed plans had been done on this pathway and if after further study it appears that will not work, the south side of Valley View could be used if it is the best location. Kingrey asked if the trees along the east property line will be preserved. Bury said yes, they lie on Mr. Miller's property and every attempt will be made not to undercut them. MOTION: Kingrey moved to recommend to the Council approval of Arbor Glen per Staff memo of August 12, 1982 and Planning Cormission Memo of August 5, 1982, with a request that special caution be used relative to construction of trails and their possible impact on berms along Valley View and Baker Roads. Breitenstein seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. August 16, Ng./ 1112?) Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes -9- August 9, 1982 ALL MEMBERS PRESENT. E. ARBOR GLEN, by BFK Partnership. Request for PUD approval on 40 acres for residential uses, rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for 24 acres for 51 units, and from Rural to RN 6.5 for 8 acres for 28 units, and preliminary plat approval for the construction of 51 single family and 28 townhouse units and possible variances. Located in the northeast corner of Baker Road and Valley View Road, and south of Cardinal Creek. A public hearing. Enger referred to the Staff report of August 5, 1982 which contains recommendations and review of this project. Enger introduced Jim Hill prescat on behalf of the proponents. Mr. Hill stated the 40 acre site proposed will be made up of 51 single family lots and 28 townhouse units. He said the Staff report recommends a sidewalk on Road B and a trail connecting the Cardinal Creek trail to this site. Enger said the Planning Staff recommends approval of this PUD concept phase and approval of the request for rezoning. Enger read the recommendations of the August 5th Staff report. Marhula asked for a clarification of the density transfer in this proposal. Enger said in most cases density transfer refers to open space but also can be used in caces where there zrc mixed uses in a PUD, such as this one of single family and townhouse units. Staff feels the shifting around in density is appropriate in this case. The large lot single family and townhouse units are well separated and there is good transition. Marhula said on an overall map of the neighborhood, Forest Hills Road looks like it should extend through to Baker Road. He said he feels the City should not close off that option with this project. Marhula asked if the existing mining operation permit has expired? Hill said it is the proponents intent to complete mining operations and grade the site this year. There is a considerable amount of excess material that will go off the site or be used as fill on the site. Resident Jerrold T. Miller, 7120 Gerard Drive, said his property is on the east boundary of this site and he is concerned with grade changes near his property. He does not want to see the trees disturbed. Dick Ferrick said he will work with the property owner on this 0-oblem. Bearman said by ordinance there can be no more than a 3:1 grade. Enger added that the grading plan shows the slope stays at a 2:1 graae. Resident Lonny Jensen, 6979 Sandridge Road, said he does not want to see excessive grading near his property. Beannan advised him if children are endangered by a grade, then the developer is required to build a fence. MOTION 1 Gartner moved to close the public hearing on Arbor Glen. Torjesen seconded the motion and it carried 7-0. Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes -10 - August 9, 1982 MOTION 2 -Gartner moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the Arbor Glen PUD as per the plans dated June 30, 1982 and the Staff report of August 5, 1982 and per Highway Department letter dated August 2, 1982. Hallett seconded the motion and it carried 7-0. MOTION 3 -6-rtner moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and RM6.5 as per the plans dated June 30, 1982 and the Staff report of August 5, 1982 and the Highway Department letter dated August 2, 1982. Hallett seconded the motion and it carried 7-0. MOTION 4 Gartner moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat dated June 30, 1982, as per the Staff report of August 5, 1982 and the Highway Department letter dated August 2, 1982. Torjesen seconded the motion and it carried 7-0. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL CHECK LIST (ATTACHED TO PLANNING STAFF REPORT) ATE:__Aligust 12, 1982 PROJECT: Arbor Glenn PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES CONCERNS: 1. Adjacent to any existing or proposed parks: Adjacent to the dedicated open space area to the northeast fan old lake bed). a. Affect on the park: N/A 2. Cash park fee or land dedication: cash park fee 'a. If cash park fee, amount based on existing ordinance will t o t a l : $23,575 b% If park dedication, the number of acres to be dedicate d : - 1 acre c. .Existing or pending assessments or taxes on the proposed p a r k p r o p e r t y w i l l b e paid prior to dedication: Yes 3. Adjacent to existing or proposed trails: Propsoed trails adjacent to old Valley View Road, Baker Road, "B*Street and connecting thru Oulot A to Cardinal Creek. a. Party responsible for trail construction: Developer L. Landownership of trail location: (dedicated, purchased, ROW)Dedicated ROW 4. Grading plan comments: Community Services Department staff recommends careful revie w of the steep slope existing and proposed along the eastern boundary of the site. 5. Significant vegetation on the site:_ N/A . 6. Adjacent to protected waters: No REFERENCE CHECK 1. *MAC N/A 2. Neighborhood Facilities Study This site will be served by Forest Hills School/Park and Ldenvale Last Park 3. Purgatory Creek Study 4. Shoreland Management Ordinance N/A 5. Floodplain Ordinance N/A 6. Guide Plan Indicates low density residential for this site. 7. Other -2- RECOMMENDATIONS • 1. Adjacent neighborhood type, and any neighborhood opinion voiced in favor or opposed to the project: • 2. Planning Commission Recommendation: Planning Commission recommended approval as Per Planninf Staff Report, Recommend approval with the following 3. Community Services Staff Recommendation: addition to the Planning Staff Report: *S. Grade in a 10 foot wide trail adjacent to Baker Road from B Street to the northern property line and grade in a 10 foot wide trail adjacent to old Valley View Road alone the entire southern boundary of the site as per Community Services Department specifications. nzl STAFF REPORT LOCATION: Planning Commission Chris Enger, Director of Planning August 5, 1982 ARBOR GLEN PUD Approval of 40.3 acres for uses of 51 single family detached homes and 28 single family attached homes for a total of 79 units at a density of 1.96 u/acre; Rezoning of 24.2ac.from Rural to R1-13.5 for 51 single family homes and preliminary platting of the entire 40.3 acre parcel for road right-of-ways, 51 single family homes, and an outlot for future zoning and platting of 28 attached single family townhouses. At the northeast corner of Baker Road and Valley View Road. TO: FROM: DATE: PROJECT: REQUEST: BACKGROUND The existing zoning of the parcel is Rural, the Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this area as low density residential. The property has been utilized for a number of years as a gravel pit and with the exception of trees around the perimeter of the property is largely unvegetated. The project is not within a floodplain or within a shoreland management area. SURROUNDING LAND USES To the west of this property is Baker Road which is currently being upgraded from the intersection of Valley View Road and Mitchell Road to a point approximately 600 feet north of the existing intersection of Old Valley View Road and Baker Road along the project's western boundary. The upgrading of Baker Road will include an 8 foot bituminous bike trail to the road improvements project's northern boundary (600 feet north of the existing intersection of Old Valley View Road and Baker Road). Further west of Baker Road are large lot single family. To the north of this project is Cardinal Creek subdivision which is currently under development and is made up of large lot single family. To the east of the property is large lot single family and a small subdivision of single family lots. To the south of the project is existing Valley View Road and further south is a proposed project called Sundquist Addition which is made up of duplex lots. LAND USE The intent of the project is to provide large lot single family homes in the northeastern 3/4 of the 40 acres utilizing the balance of the density in a transition in the southwestern corner of the project to the proposed land uses south of Valley View Road. Since the overall density of the project is under 2 units/acre, the general land use proposed is within the naramters the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The townhouses proposed in the southwestern corner of the project are bordered on the left and south by major arterial roads and would provide an adequate barrier between the proposed townhouses and other adjacent land uses. The proximity of townhouses to the proposed r ,/ Staff Report-Arbor Glen page 2 lots bne thrnugh six, in Block three), which are the single family lots which liesouth of road B in the development, will be a problem for rezoning in the future because of the eminent development and sale of the single family lots prior to development of the townhouse parcel. Several steps should be taken by the developer to mitigate the potention problem. 1. Grading of the project should include grading of ten to twelve foot berms between the single family lots and the proposed townhouse area in areas where existing vegetation does not pro- vide a natural buffer. In addition, the developer should locate signs on the multiple property designating it as an intended townhouse parcel. In addition, the developer should assure that all sales information both written and verbal conveyed to potential buyers clearly depicts the area as a future multiple area. SITE PLAN The road systems as planned by the developer in their most recent submission, dated July 19, 1982 provides for the proper access to Baker Road and Valley View Road as required by Hennepin County in their letter of August 2, 1982. In addition, the plat provides for the appropriate right-of-way as requested on Baker Road and Valley View Road. Because of the size of the single family lots, it is suggested that no totlot is necessary for the single family area but the need for a totlot in the multiple area will be reevaluated at the time of rezoning request. Ultimate plans by the Lity are to provide a City neighbulkoud pork approximately cue-half mile to the south of this area and existing Forest Hills Park approximately one-half mile to the north of this area, The City would be providing trails along Baker Road. The developer must include a five foot wide concrete sidewalk within the right-of-way of B Street and increase the right-of-way to 60 feet in order to accommodate this. Sidewalks should be constructed as a part of the overall installation of streets and utilities in the area. In addition, a 20 foot wide outlet should be platted and dedicated to the City between Lots 12 and 13, Block 1, (which would coincide with the storm sewer utilities) to Outlot A. Within these outlots, a six foot wide bituminous trail should be constructed by the developer which leads from A Street northeasterly to Outlet A thence northwesterly to connect with the existing outlet and trail provided in Cardinal Creek Add. This trail connection will provide an internal trail link & alternate pedes- trian and bicycle way from this neighborhood up to Forest Hills School and from the Cardinal Creek neighborhood southerly down to the proposed City park south of this area. RECOMMUIDATIONS The Planning Department would recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept phase and approval of the request for rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for 51 single family lots and the preliminary platting of the 40.3 acre project for 51 single family lots, road right-of-way, trail outlots, and outlet B for future rezoning and platting as a multiple parcel subject to the following: 1. The developer should grade an adequate buffer between the proposed single family area and the proposed multiple area and vegetate it immediately upon development of the property. In addition, the developer should post signs on the multiple project which learly depicted as a future multiple site and assured that all verbal and written sales information the multilpe parcel is clearly defined, •., Staff Report-Arbor Glen page 3 2. An outlot of 20 feet in width must be provided by the developer southwesterly of Outlot A between Lots 12 and 13, Block 1, and a six foot wide bituminous pathway should be built through these outlots at the time of street and utility construction to connect to the existing black-top pathway in Cardinal Creek. In addition, the developer shall construct within tie right- of-way of B Street a five foot wide concrete sidewalk on one side of the street and within a right-of-way of 60 feet provided by the developer, 3. The cash park fee would be applicable to this project. 4. All grading and storm water sedimentation plans must be reviewed by the City Engineering Department and the Nine-Mile Creek Watershed District prior to construction. Particular attention should be paid to the impact of this project on the development westerly known as Sutton's 1st Addition. It is possible that the storm sewer for this area if properly planned, could help alleviate a land locked drainage piece on the Sutton property. Potential for this should be investigated. CE:sh 11 ?JO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av, South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 935-3381 August 2, 1982 71- HENNEPIN Mr. Chris Enger Director of Planning City of Eden Prairie 8250 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Mr. Enger: Re: Proposed Plat - "B.F.K. Addition - Arbor Glen" CSAH 60 NE quadrant CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) Section 10, Township 116, Range 22 Hennepin County Plat No. 1034 Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and found it ot_Leptable with consideration of these conditions: After sending the Plat letter dated 7-30-82 we discoverd an error regarding the access unto CSAH 39. This is the corrected letter. The letter dated 7-30-82 can be discarded. The proposed right of way dedication shown for CSAH 60 (Baker Road) on the preliminary plat dated 06-30-82 is acceptable to Hennepin County. This dedication allows for the construction of new CSAH 60. For future improvements to CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) the developer should dedicate an additional 7 feet of right of way making the right of way 40 feet from the center of CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) as shown on plat dated 06-30-82. The location of the proposed access on to CSAH 39 is acceptable to Hennepin County. To provide for better storm drainage and to improve the sight distance to the north the developer must locate the proposed access on to CSAH 60 approximately .)),45A feet north of the centerline CSAH 39. 60 e'. W, All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. See our Maintenance Division for utility permit forms. HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer Mr. Chris Enger, Augus, 2, 1982 - page 2 - The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within County right of way. Please direct any response or questions to Les Weigelt. Sincerely, James M. Wold, P. E. Chief, Planning and Programming by J. V. Vohs JMW/LDW:de Attachment cc: James R. Hill, Inc. 8200 Humboldt Ave. So. Bloomington, MN 55431 6-30-82 JRH SITE DATA: BFK Partnership 6401 Industrial Drive P.O. Box 338 Hopkins, Mn 55343 Partners: Richard Burry Richard Feerick Howard Kyllo Louise Doughty and John & Beatrice Veness James R. Hill, Inc. PUD Concept Approval; Preliminary Plat Approval for Phase I; and Rezoning from Ru to R1-13.5 for Phase I 79 Dwelling Units 40.3 Gross Acres 1.96 Du/GA BFK ADDITION 0 .• EDEN PRAIRIE, MN APPLICANT, CONTRACT PURCHASER, DEVELOPER, BUILDER: FEE OWNER: CONSULTANT: REQUEST: SFD Lots Townhouses OL A (Public) Right-of-way 24.2 Ac 7.8 Ac 1.0 Ac 7.3 Ac 51 Du 28 Du 40.3 Ac 79 Du DESCRIPTION: That part of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 10; thence South to a point distant 150 feet North from the Southeast corner thereof; thence West 290.4 feet; thence South to the North line of County Road Number 60; thence West along said road to the West line of said Northeast quarter; thence North to the North line thereof; thence East to the point of beginning except road. i ';')J ").) BFK ADDITION (cont.) EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is located on the NE corner of Baker Road and Valley View Road and is now and has been a gravel pit for over 20 years. Because of past and present use of the site as a gravel pit, existing topography shows a much rugged condition; this condition will be corrected with the proposed development. With the exception of a few small isolated groups of trees within the site, most of the existing tree cover is along Baker Road and along Valley View Road. Trees consist of oaks, elms, cottonwood, and poplar; approximately 90% of the existing trees are second growth. For the past three years 150 trees have been removed because of dutch elm disease and/or oak wilt. It will be the intent of the Partnership to provide for a buffer of existing tree growth along Baker Road and along Valley View Road, the extent of which is indicated by the grading plan. Additional landscaping will be provided in conjunction with the townhouse plans when submitted for approval, PROPOSAL: Request for PUD concept approval of the proposal to develop 51 lots for single family homes and 28 townhouses; preliminary plat approval of Phase I of the PUD consisting of all 51 lots for single family homes; and the rezoning from Ru to R1-13.5 for Phase I. With the approval of proposal, the gravel pit operation will end this year. Additional gravel will be taken off the site this summer to provide granular fill for the Baker Road improvement. Outlot A will be dedicated to the city as a continuation of the ponding and open space provided for in the Cardinal Creek Addition. Outlot B will be the area developed for townhouses. Two housing types were selected to provide the buyer with a choice of living style, type of home, and price range. The site's location, road systems, existing and proposed adjacent land uses, and topography provide the conditions in which the proposed SFD and SFA residential land use is found acceptable when relating to marketability of the homes and when relating to the existing neighbor- hood. The average lot size for the SFD lots is 20,743 net SF and for the townhouses it is 12,133 net SF. STREETS/ UTILITIES: Access to the site will be from Baker Road and Valley View Road. All streets will be public except the townhouse court which will be private and maintained by the townhouse homeowners association. Right- of-way improvements and utilities will conform to city specifications. Drainage of the site will be to the northeast to the existing ponding area which has a designed high water level of 878 and an outlet to Nine Mile Creek. BFK ADDITION (cont.) TIMING/ PHASING: Water service for the site will be from existing mains on Baker Road and Valley View Road, and can be looped thru the development. Sanitary sewer will be extended from the Sunquist Addition on Valley View Road and brought into the site. The sanitary sewer must be constructed thru the Sunquist Addition to Valley View Road this year so that the proposed site has sewer service available. It is the intent of the Partnership to sell lots and build single family homes; also to proceed, after concept approval, with the design and preliminary plat exhibits for approval of the townhouse Phase Two for construction and sale by the Partnership. The single family homes are anticipated to sell for $150,000 to $250,000 and the townhouse to sell for $125,000 to $165,000. Subject to the housing market activity, the Partnership estimates a three to four year completion period for the development after the site is ready for home construction. Anticipated schedule for development is: 1982: - approvals - site grading - city installed utilities - Owner installs gravel on streets - SFD lot sales and home construction 1983: - Owner or city completes streets (SFD) - approvals for townhouse PhD - townhouse utilities and gravel street completed - townhouse models opened • - continued sales/marketing of SFD & SFA homes and lots 1984: - complete townhouse street - continued sales/marketing of SFD & SFA homes and lots 1985-86: - continued sales/marketing of SFD & SFA homes and lots. 7 ..........!........ '''''''''''''''''' ..,.. 0.1-.1( ADDITION .Iv• NI.... "II LOCATION MAP PLANNFRS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS James R. Hill, inc. I . R. F ADDITION I. OW. nu..Mr. MY PRELIMINARY PLAT PHASING PLAN Ja mes R. Hill, inc. F•LANNERS / ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS n•• AY ••n••nn••,•n V...../001100.n James R. Hill, inc. B. F. IL ADDITION 11n•• Mho. Ea PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN PLANNERS /ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS Mtn dean, •n• .11.41/p•••,...411•10.1. .11.14 sin Mk At MO. J 1 , \ \ 1'1 \ ; • : VIO “•• i • fa. i " I D. I.. K. ADDITION Paunt. oft PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN a Ft. I James R. Hill, inc. PLANNERS / ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS ......u. .. ......................o. 1 1 0 4 4 910 1 *00 91H • 's 1 .27 99.9:1,....e 31 PO 900 .890 900 HO HO 070 1100 v • 3 2 I 0 1190 8 7 ' *185E7 920 910 i.is;:s:11 920 910 \ r\ 13 32 7J Srf LIGET • 00 900 TYPICAL STREET SECTION .T I •90 980 .0 270 20 s9 441 17 i0 9 13k 7 5 • is N James R. Hill, inc. B. F. K. ADDITION PLPNERS / ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS PRELIMINARY STREET GRADES B. P. K. PARTNERSHIP 11•01:4005791•Lrly• "Cf S-112.8.2-7 i :.1 _ iii 0, it --j-----N r --, ! ..._..., \ I-' I "'------'—'-1"-'-1 1 1 • - ti \ -A' %TREE T i I.- . i /.... Et NIC,N Arbor Glen PUD CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA •• • RESOLUTION 82-211 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ARBOR GLEN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND AMENDING THE GUIDE PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of Ordinance 135 provided for the Planned Unit Developmeqt (PUD) of certain areas located within the City, and WHEREAS, the Arbor Glen PUD is considered a proper amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan, and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on BFK Partnership's request for PUD approval for single family and multiple residential and recommended approval of the PUD Concept to the City Council, and WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on September 7, 1982. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota as follows: 1. The Arbor Glen PUD, being in Hennepin County, State of Minnescta, and legally described cs outlincd in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD approval as outlined in the application material dated June 30, 1982 revised July 19, 1982. 3. That the PUD meet the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated August 9, 1982. ADOPTED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie this day of , 1982. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL AREA TO BE REZONED TO R1-13 at part of the Northeast oarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 10; thence south to a point distant 150 feet north from the southeast corner thereof; thence west 290.4 feet; thence south to the north line of County Road Number 60; thence west along ,said road to the west line of said Northeast Quarter; thence north to the north line thereof; thence east to the point of beginning. Except that part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as fo)lows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 01 minutes 15 seconds East along the west line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 793.00 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 45 seconds — East a distance of 112.00 feet; thence South 46 degrees 39 minutes 41 seconds East a distance of 115.00 feet; thence South 56 degrees 52 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 138.00 feet; thence South 70 degrees 31 minutes 28 seconds East a distance of 140.60 feet; thence South 58 degrees 05 minutes. 23 seconds East a distance of 60.00 feet; thence North 53 deorees 40 minutes 37 seconds East a distance of 150.01 feet; thence southeasterly a distance of 311.72 feet along a nontangential curve, concave to the southwest, having a central angle of 28 degrees 56 minutes 10 seconds, a radius of 617.23 feet and a chord bearing of South 20 degrees 09 minutes 40 seconds East; thence South 5 degrees 41 minutes 35 seconds East, tangent to said curve, to the north line of County Road No. 60; thence westerly along said north line to said west line of the Northeast Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 01 minutes 15 seconds West along said west line to the point of beginning. EXHIBIT A p. 1 of 2 AREA TO BE REZONED TO RM 6.5 That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: _ Comnencing at the northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 01 minutes 15 seconds East along the west line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 793.00 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 45 seconds East a distance of 112.00 feet; thence South 46 degrees 39 minutes 41 seconds East a distance of 115.00 feet; thence South — 56 degrees 52 minutes 6 6 seconds East a distance of 138.00 feet; thence South 70 degrees 31 minutes 28 seconds East a distance of 140.60 feet; thence South 58 degrees 05 minutes 23 seconds East a distance of 60.00 feet; thence North 53 degrees 40 minutes 37 seconds East a distance of 150.01 feet; thence southeasterly a distance of 311.72 feet along a nontangential curve, concave to the southwest, having a central angle of 28 degrees 56 minutes 10 seconds, a radius of 617.23 feet and a chord bearing of South 20 degrees 09 minutes 40 seconds East; thence South 5 degrees 41 minutes 35 seconds East, tangent to said curve, to the north line of County Road No. 60; thence westerly along said north line to said west line of the Northeast Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 01 minutes 15 seconds West along said west line to the point of beginning. EXHIBIT A p. 2 of 2 noti CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 82-212 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ARBOR GLEN BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: . That the preliminary plat of Arbor Glen dated 6/30/82 rev. 7/19/82, a copy of which is on file at the CityHall and amended as follows: is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances and amendments thereto and is herein approved. . ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of 19 . Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor John D. Frane,.City Clerk SEAL Ii q s Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes -B- August 9, 1982 . ALL MEMBERS PRESENT. C. NORSEMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 5th ADDITION, by Herleiv Helle. Request FóF rezoning 2 acres from Rural to 1=2 Park and preliminary plat approval. Located south of West 74th Street extended. A public hearing. Bearman relinquished the chair to Retterath because of potential conflict of interest. Sigmund Helle, representing Herleiv Helle, stated the proposal meets the City's guide plan and ordinances. The owner is willing to dedicate land for the extension of W. 74th Street, in the future. Marhula said that it is his understanding the proponent owns considerable property west of the addition. Has there been an overall concept plan for this property, or have the requests been in piecemeal fashion? Enger said the proposals have been piecemeal in a sense, but the owner has been following the sketch plan (Figure 1) presented to the City with Norseman Third Addition. Helle said he was still confused with regard to what the City is requiring for W. 74th Street. Fnger stated the City is requesting a dedicated and constructed connection to Valley View Road with the next development. Marhula said he feels there are many questions that must be answered with the ultimate development of subsequent plats. He feels the present proposal is somewhat sketchy but appears to be straightforward. The proponent should update their concept plan for the balance of the property. MOTION 1 Marhula moved to recommend closing the public hearing on Norseman Industrial Park 5th Addition. Gartner seconded, the motion carried 6-0-1, Bearman abstained. MOTION 2 Marhula moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning from Rural to 1-2 as per the plans of June 10, 1982 and the Staff report of August 5, 1982, with the addition of Item 7: Prior to further platting of this irdustrial park the owner be required to update the concept plan of proposed development and road alignment. Sutliff seconded the motion and it carried 6-0-1, Bearman abstained. MOTION 3 MiFFUTi—oved to recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plan dated June 10, 1982, as per the staff report of August 5, 1982 including Item 7 as added. Sutliff seconded the motion and it carried 6-0-1, Bearman abstained. 1 116 STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: PROJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT AND FEE OWNER: REQUEST: Planning Commission Jean Johnson, Assistant Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning August 4, 1982 • NORSEMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 5TH ADDITION South of West 74th Street extended Herleiv Helle I. Rezone 2 acres from Rural to 1-2. 2. Preliminary plat 2 acres from 16 acres for 1 lot and road right- of-way. BACKGROUND The property is part of a 16 acre Rural piece west of Mr. Helle's Norseman Industrial Park 3rd and pith Additions. The Guide Plan depicts the area as Industrial. Prior to building permit issuance on the 4th Addition, an overall storm sewer improvement was made which will serve this and future developments. During review of the 3rd Addition, a road study was done and Mr. Helle committed to a north/south road (see figure land 2). SITE CHARACTERISTICS The site has been gravelled over the past years. Weeds and some grasses have grown on certain portions of the gravelled area, Trees occur along the south side of the lot perched upon a ridge. This ridge is between two gravelled areas. Trees upon this ridge are dead elms and some cottonwoods. ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS 1-2 District: Min lot size 2 acres Min width and depth 200/300' Setbacks: front 50' sides 20:40' rear 25' Max FAR I story 30% Max height 40' Parking ave. 3 sp/1,000 Proposed Lot: 2 acres 250/370' As per Ordinance SI Mtn Staff Report-Norseman Industrial Park 5th Add. page 2 Previous Norseman Addition platting has occured with the condition that the future building meet the Building Code and Zoning Ordinance requirements. A 2 acre lot can support a 26,130 sq. ft. single story building. Parking spaces will be determined by the Building Inspector after specific use of the building is known. SITE PLAN Minimal grading will take place to prepare the lot for building. Utilities are installed and the hardsurface portion of West 74th Street abuts all except approximately 80 feet of the lot's frontage. For future extension of West 74th Street, the area shown as West 74th Street, northwest of the 5th Addition, should be platted as an outlot and dedicated in conjuction with the north/south road. Until the north/south road is constructed and intersects West 74th Street, West 74th Street will be a 1500 foot long cul-de-sac. All utility hook-ups will be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and all storm sewer will be subject to Watershed District rules and regulations. CASH PARK FEE At time of building permit issuance, cash park fae pat will be required. RECOMMENDATIONS Planning Staff recommends approval of the zoning and platting of Norseman Industrial Park 5th Addition subject to the following: 1. Building upon the lot meet all requirements of the Building Code and Zoning Ordinance. 2. All utility work be subject to the review and approval of the City • Engineer. 4. All storm sewer plans meet the rules and regulations of the Watershed District. • 4. At time of building permit issuance the cash park fee payment be made. S. Owner notify City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. G. Right-of-way for West 74th Street north and west to Valley View Road be platted as an outlot and dedicated to the City for public road nurposes. And right-of-way for the north/south road be platted and dedicated to the City for public road purposes. Both to occur prior to any subsequent platting. JJ:sh PK. PARK 11:1 nnnn-1 SCHOOL NORTH rND: 2,4,1 1/4 70 TH ST. DISTRICT 0151 RIG PIO Nine Mile cr'ec earma Res. VAL.PL.OFF Lei L:; ST. IJJ (CI" 11041 0 AK -7: LE 0 ,n•n• 1411 JISO.TO .1K11•4%i DR. -J ' p. Norseman 5th fie. 2 117,-0 c...f " r e. ; I A i or ; :.••• in ' , ,I ; .,, t.' I •••• ' li ' BENCH MARK: 1 ..:: ....) I.- ' -,r /1-7 ' 40A a ir .r IoN, .-. c - ..v " . 1 qt.' 0 II A , 00 ,..1 4,•"/ I... C .: la • i I 0 '.L. OL RSEN:.;,/ , ' - . PA° n,., 0\ e 0 , ( ' I Top 867. 27 `, Hydrant -. /., ;0,r., 0.n.: /c, 1 /01.10c/It 1,514irDieletAa9,51cpt,...1117......ADO>" :A,,‘„alr:.:Ar; j 0,/,');" • Telephone Box -2,p ,c`I'‘1+:1*9/-*''4110 .F L 61 I {141410 1- ___--- - raA 0 Yle s 1151 • . . :.. 1... 115) si-.96-°.78'23 -4,:: >2 -.0P co ole r oC 1140 - --- gas;r1-- A .,- • I 1 .5% 865.13-1_ ... . ; I :.--------- C atcl'‘,6•5,g° i 4: •• • Tor 8 / i " 't% C866. r „64,-/-ti64.-1 966 865.75 ---': ' Gale Valve i ...11 \ 865.2 -/• / Cln '.1 % 8i14',. cri 61. A / 886. 5::„/".......**. 066.4.51 74 T HI ,-,7 i cs A, , ca \ 1 v'fr . I ! / - 4--;`j /e6G.2 !:_rf5-t-- k--;-.-!V•LI.--A ---- 865.7„5.:),_1_,,..- 1. / Cur, 861. 0 j. _g65.7-6-66,35 ..„... • • .., .966.3.5 1 t i STREET 'Nt `1 $ 3 a -- . . . J . ,A• z .,/.85.80 ... 866.4G-1, . -:=.1:-----C:::1,-- C...•75 ...!--:...-31 -,, 0 . tv....4 s..• ...,... , 5 86°.?,526"-• ' **- -,..0 _ _.,1/ ,- F. ": - . - I- -7-, :7 ii 7:: ,;-_- 1 . ..= - -_-_ -_-- -. _ - - - -r-,5 Zt, _ • •- '''' II .T.'•• • • l i .1'7.°° / 'WV6112345•"1-- -- .t r4 '512i045 t 'CY .E•C 8 10 .55 I% I LI-r, I I II . .........:,..A.Drairiag \e \and\ tlfilityEaLl.e4rn5 ente, 870.2?, I n••• \ N N n Z 0 i, CI ck P st •er' ‘t • u. ... , -4 kl "k N tr X 870.85 1-- • , 4,0 .,•s , ,..sCI .., .:-.2. / . \ % / q• s2 killti "? L . s •-• •• cc t 070-Z3 ,2s Cs La i \ \I • 1867.2 • ., C .', -Z ib6 N 9.25 \ , / 868.11 / / i e, r."6/ I / ‘. .,,4 o ..4. ,i . / 1- ., .0.o/. /. / / ,, : . ''.1). i t.n .s.,; (86135 1 I , • V 1 . 4 , .3. .• ' •••• • • s 0 ` ) ( %.::. -4 I N. ',, ,treiLts k i , \ .„... ,....., i , % \ n 4 ; 0 -871.1 -\\.n .1.863 'Isl N, ---- ......., / \ I 4 ..., / \ \ /:,.2; .V .....„. . . - _ ........ , ..... . . ..... , -....... -.5---- \ `. I lis. / ,, 1.:• 4. , „ I -',.. ......, ......, ..,... I \ ' 4 :-.• I; .7.-.7..-_-. --:j -- -- •-.... >-.. --.- 4. • -....„ .....,---. -- ____ --. aid i 869.9 -- ---:-- --. -- ---- ••••n i4 / . '' '\ '-04 -..- . s '''-'n ....--- .--... ••,..„„ ..---" -:::-..--..--n••• ..... 8G9.0.5 \ . / 4-00.1_,1 1.../ ,/ -..:-_, _ \ I.• - --- ...7.„- -- --- -.. -- -_.-- ...„---‹-,..,-1......,, p 12// ...-- _,.. -..... ....... _ ...... ,...-85----.....-----:: ---_,.. -- -.7.7... --... --Z.' ••••.....---, ---... • t ,,„ , , .,,„ ,r .. .. ,, ......... ...., _ , 8 9 9 0 S, n • % - .. - ..j.. . '" .: - ....Y. 0 r a i r 7 a 7.7 Z..; -arid:Uhl 1 -z E s."---- ---r-44-. \4::. " w . . --" ..... ''' $ - 874.25 nn• •'-'''''''' ...`'s - r -0--; Jx:,t3.-.....:-: -.----.>-4.. z-...--- -_ ,, ..:_-, --- - '_f_.:-_ .2 6,0..nu.: z :s _..._ ..-_:.- . _ - , ....„:„____,...,..., ..... -,,,)is\NN ef , _..) ......4-- 4,_ __-_---_-=_• .-..2.7.-Ery , . 8 5:....-5-_--- -----:-.1 -iljij.r..-r-r•-=•-•-•-• 7-7.-1 \ N.' %**- 75 -dD 7 3.:- ,..-- .._ -4.- ---a a .5.--te:),•o-- __ _26-0:73) --- dt.73.04,1 1 1 i I/ ' / //,--'4 17 9.75--• -''''' I( -' •'. Z /// I ,..-- ••••--• .1"---' _ _ --. ,. " ,/ /// / I / 1 u n / ',. -,..---....„ **;,.; 00/ / / /"- --.2 - - '`. --4,6%,,ft,d-,-,e,;:'ic.,. „.. t • i -• - ' // /AL 75- N. 875. 2 *N-8.9r.a / / / // / / /1 n.._ -- "., \ .0 \ N. .. .. 1 . ....‘„...i.,; 1 \\ LOT f -867.7 i N 1 86L%-z I \ / • / 1 to t7 1 / B L 0 C.K 1 / / va.s4 I \ ‘ l'rt 866.8 1 867.0 3 6 - --- 1-1.:1 - N I / I 71-8612 I i869.155 ../ ..-- \ N • ',......• e 87 1.45 'I %,.;•• CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE , HENNEPIN COUNTy,.MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 82-213 • • RESOLUTION APPROVING TUE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF NORSEMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 5TH ADD. BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Norseman Industrial Park 5th Addition dated 6/10/82 ,a copy of which is on file at the City Hall and amended as follows: is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances and amendments thereto and is herein approved. . ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of 19 . Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor. John D. Frane, City Clerk • 1 SEAL TO: Mayor & Council FROM: John Frane DATE: September 2, 1982 RE: Public Hearing on Federal Revenue Sharing The hearing is required under the revenue sharing rules. The City has desicnated the funds to be used for Public Safety purposes, which is one of the allowable uses. I suggest we do so again. Our revenue sharing has dropped from $154,000 to $83.500. 053 September 7, 1982 STA -- OF MINNESOTA Cr, T EDEN PRAIRIE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows: Insurance Insurance Insurance Insurance Insurance Insurance Postage Liquor Wine Liquor Liquor Wine Liquor Wine Liquor Liquor Wine Beer Beer Beer Beer Mixes Mixes Mixes Beer Beer Beer Beer Postage Conference-Senior Citizens Expenses Expenses Land Supplies-Canine Unit Packet delivery Liquor Liquor Liquor Liquor Liquor Liquor Wine Ad-Liquor Stores Beer of June sales tax July sales tax Printing-Senior Citizens Postage-Fall Brochure 3405 VOID OUT CHECK 3406 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE 3407 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN 3408 MEDCENTER HEALTH PLAN 3409 BLUE CROSS INSURANCE 3410 HMO SERVICES 3411 GROUP HEALTH PLAN, INC. 3412 HOPKINS POSTMASTER 3413 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. 3414 TWIN CITY WINE CO. 3415 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. 3416 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE 3417 OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. 3418 BELLBOY CORPORATION 3419 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO. 3420 MINNESOTA DISTILLERS, INC. 3421 NELSON ENTERPRISES 3422 PAUSTIS & SONS 3423 BEER WHOLESALERS, INC. 34 .- EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO. A.J. OGLE CO., INC. 3426 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 3427 GOLD MEDAL BEVERAGE CO. 3428 COCA COLA BOTTLING CO. 3429 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO. 3430 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 3431 CITY CLUB DISTRIBUTING CO 3432 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO. 3433 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING 3434 PETTY CASH 3435 IOWA LAKES AREA AGENCY 3436 KRIS KRYSTOFIAK 3437 MY CHEESE SHOP 3438 PRESERVE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, INC. 3439 ROBBINSDALE FARM & GARDEN 3440 DANA GIBBS 3441 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. 3442 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. 3443 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE 3444 OLD PEORIA CO., INC. 3445 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. 3446 MINNESOTA DISTILLERS, INC. 3447 TWIN CITY WINE CO. 344A INFORMATION PUBLISHERS, INC. 3' CITY CLUB DISTRIBUTING CO. 34:),, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 3451 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 3452 1NSTY-PRINTS 3453 HOPKINS POSTMASTER (47.0 524.2. 8,437.4 2,591.2 715.Ek 524.1 1,693.3_ 2,000.0 2,097.91 431.7, 3,481.0. 312.7: 164.4; 4,486.3.1 136.00 1,286.02 44.40 254.65 9,437.52 10,941.8' 4,918.8( 206.2; 956.36 13,909.6: 3,255.2 47.78 254.88 9.82 50.02 40.00 42.3: 232,684.4 - 265.6t, 65.0; 2,005.71 1,573.9 732.8: 842.C, 95.82 1,373.11 55.4i 237.6 1,638.8. 5,054.: 7,995.0 96.1 593.4t 131 14 Page two Sp ' ')er 7, 1982 3454 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK 3455 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 3456 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 3457 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE 3458 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT 3459 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE 3460 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS 3461 PERA 3462 MINNESOTA UC FUND 3463 COMMISSIONER OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 3464 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL 3465 HOLIDAY INN OF FARGO 3466 NORTH CENTRAL SECTION AWWA 3467 UNITED STATES POLICE CANINE ASSOC. 3468 MARK TEITLEBAUM 3469 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. 3470 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. 3471 MIDWEST WINE CO. 3472 TWIN CITY WINE CO. 3473 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING 3474 PAUSTIS & SONS 3475 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE 317 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. 347, HOPKINS POSliASTER 3478 OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. 3479 PETTY CASH 3480 SCHERER LUMBER 3481 MANKATO-NORTH MANKATO CONFERENCE 3482 PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL ASSOC. 3483 MINNESOTA STATE DOCUMENTS CENTER 3484 ERIK ALBRECHT 3485 AMY ALLAN 3486 CORY BLAD 3487 DIANE BRADY 3488 PAUL BURKE 3489 CHRISTINE CARLSON 3490 DAVE DAHL 3491 MARK DAHL 3492 JULIE DALTON 3493 BRIDGET DIERICK 3494 JON DUSTRUD 3495 SARAH DUVICK 3496 KEVIN GEASON 3497 DOUG HABERMAN 3498 ANGELA HARRINGTON 3499 BRENDA HACKERT 35P" BRIAN JOHNSON 35 GREG JOHNSON 3502 SUE JOHNSON 3503 CRAIG KIRKLAND 3504 GREG KRATZ 3505 JULIE KRUSE 3506 TERESA KRUSE 3507 EVONNE KUNDEL Payroll Payroll Payroll Payroll Payroll Payroll Payroll Payroll Payroll Payroll January- July 1982 Access Charges Expenses-Water Dept. Conference-Water Dept. Fee-Canine Unit Instructor-Karate Liquor Wine Wine Wine Wine Wine Liquor Liquor Postage-Senior Citizens Wine Expenses Lumber-Round Lake Park Fee-Fire Dept. September rent Book-Community Services Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer Program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program Teen Volunteer program 17,146.37 7,677.32 20,188.Et 101.00 40.00 2,385.00 72.50 12,831.9 , 91.51 19,920.0 129.0u 80.00 70.00 225.00 2,945.27 542.20 1,624.20 607.72 253.00 191.30 1,486.39 2,493.41", 28.06 1,235.9: 64.80 835.00 150.00 2,080.94 10.00 65.20 46.00 85.20 18.00 60.00 68.00 55.20 77.60 115.60 112.00 38.40 49.20 49.20 74.00 69.60 60.00 71.20 64.00 38.4t , 38.4o 59.66' 70.00i 90.06i 35.26i 'age three )er 7, 1982 Teen Volunteer program 52.00 Teen Volunteer program 52.80 Teen Volunteer program 9.60 Teen Volunteer program 28.80 Teen Volunteer program 51.20 Teen Volunteer program 7.20 Teen Volunteer program 68.40 Teen Volunteer program 67.20 Teen Volunteer program 67.32 Teen Volunteer program 48.00 Teen Volunteer program 42.40 Teen Volunteer program 54.80 Teen Volunteer program 59.20 Teen Volunteer program 57.20 Teen Volunteer program 60.00 Teen Volunteer program 60.00 Teen Volunteer program 20.00 Teen Volunteer program 69.60 Teen Volunteer program 43.60 Teen Volunteer program 60.80 Teen Volunteer program 48.80 Teen Volunteer program 45.60 Teen Volunteer program ' 48.40 Teen Volunteer program 37.ts ,.., Teen Volunteer program 42.40 Teen Volunteer program 60.80 Teen Volunteer program 48.80 Teen Volunteer program 53.60 Equipment-Water Dept. 376.25 Office supplies 56.88 Equipment repair-Animal Control 18.50 Supplies-Police Dept. 57.50 Mileage . 45.25 Supplies-Water Dept. 229.02 Dues-Water Dept. 430.00 Dues-Water Dept. 43.00 Paint, posts, signs 1,844.00 Blacktop 1,168.00 Bulbs-Water Dept. 289.19 Supplies-Manager 17.42 Service-Mitchell Road & Technology Drive, 66,238.73 City West Streets, Shady Oak Feasibility, • Valley View Road, Schooner Blvd., Highway 212 Softball official 132.00 Softball official 143.00 Service-Water Treatment Plant 6,424.6: Softball official 209.0'0 Service-July 1982 360.00 Keys-Police Dept. 16.25 , Equipment repair & parts 57.5', Equipment repair & parts 101.3 1 Service-Water Dept. 55.00 Expenses 5.00 l '1519 5508 SHARON LANE 3509 DEBBIE LORENCE 3510 SHELLEY LYON 3511 CHAD MEYER 3512 MIKE O'BRIEN 3513 DEAN OLUFSON 3514 AMY PALORANTA 3515 ERME PARKER 3516 KAREN QUANBECK 3517 DENIS ROGERS 3518 SCOTT ROGERS 3519 PRATEEK SAHGAL 3520 DANA SANDS 3521 LISA SARLES 3522 MARK SAUER 3523 MATT SAUER 3524 SHELLEY SCHINDELDECKER 3525 JULIE SIMONSON 3526 KYM SIMMONS 3527 RYAN SKARE 3528 JILL STIELE 3529 KEVIN STEVENSON ls: JUT VOAS 3531 SH.TRON VOAS 3532 JILL WATERBURY 3533 (AR! WELLS 3534 LISA WEYER 3535 DEAN VOLK 3536 AGM ELECTRONICS INC. 3537 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC. 3538 ADVENTURE VAN-DATEN, INC. 3539 ALCOHOL COUNTERMEASURE SYSTEM 3540 STUART ALEXANDER 3541 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS 3542 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC. 3543 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC. 3544 EARL F. ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES 3545 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT, INC. 3546 B.I.C. PRODUCTS 3547 BALDWIN COOKE COMPANY 3548 BRW 3549 DENIS BILLMYER 3550 BRIAN BERGSTROM 3551 BLACK & VEATCH 35F^ ISAAC BLAKEY 35 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 3554 BLOOMINGTON LOCKSMITH CO. 3555 BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC & MFG. 3556 BOYER FORD TRUCKS 3557 BRADLEY EXTERMINATING CO. 3558 LYNN BRAMWELL Page four Sep ter 7, 1982 3559 LINDA BRANTLY 3560 BRAUN ENGINEERING 3561 GAYLE BRONSON 3562 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 3563 BROTHERS RESTAURANT 3564 DAN BRYAN 3565 ROZ BURNSTEIN 3566 BUTCH'S BAR SUPPLY 3567 STEPHEN CALHOON 3568 CARDOX CORPORATION 3569 CASH REGISTER SALES, INC. 3570 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS 3571 CHAPIN PUBLISHING COMPANY 3572 CHEMLAWN 3573 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, INC. 3574 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. 3575 COUNTRY CLUB MARKET, INC. 3576 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC 3577 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY 3578 HARVEY DAHBEC 357 DAttO 356. DATED BOOKS 3581 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 3582 EUGENE DIETZ 3583 DONOHUE ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS 3584 DORHOLT PRINTING 3585 DRISKILL'S SUPER VALU 3586 EDEN PRAIRIE SHOPPING NEWS 3587 GARY EGELHART 3588 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY, INC. 3589 FEED-RITE CONTROLS INC 3590 FITNESS STORE 3591 JOHN FRANE 3592 WHOLESALE LIGHTING/FREEMAN'S 3593 JAN FLYNN 3594 G.L. CONTRACTING, INC. 3595 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 3596 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 3597 GUNNAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC. 3598 JIM HATCH SALES COMPANY, INC. 3599 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT CO. 3600 TODD HELMER 3601 HENNEPIN COUNTY DIRECTOR 3602 HENNEPIN COUNTY 3601 SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT-HENN CTY. 36 INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING SUPPLY 360J INT'L CONFERENCE OF BUILDING 3606 J & R RADIATOR CORP. 3607 JEFFC0 POWER SYS1EMS 3608 CARL JULLIE 3609 KARULF HARDWARE, INC. Refund-Valleyfair ticket 7.00 Service-Bennett Place, Eden Road, Technology 12,767.5C . Drive, Mitchell Road, Atherton & Kilmer Avenue, City West, Schooner Blvd., Refund-Fitness classes 25.0( Multiplexors 3,470.0t Refund-Liquor license 2,834.0, Youth Athletics official 128.(0 Mileage 8.75 Supplies-Liquor Stores 361.0 , ' Mileage 37.70, Carbon dioxide-Water Dept. 2,642.1: Equipment parts-Liquor Store/Prairie Village Mall 4.4' Equipment parts 25.90 Legal ads 177.84 . Service 88.60 Equipment parts 1 13.00 Blueline, equipment repair & parts 406.33 Coffee 105.4 ,1 Chemicals-Water Dept. 27.01 Quicklime-Water Dept. 10,717.41 Supplies-Community Center 25.00 Cleaning supplies 1,047.90 Daily journal-Street Maintenance 59.93 Fee-Staring Lake 25.00 Expenses 150.00 Service-6 F I 1,066.70 Office supplies 89.56 Supplies-Rec Dept. 310.86 Ads-Kids Korner, Community Center 61.60 Softball official 22.00. Ear plugs-Park Maintenance 35.65 Sulfate-Water Dept. 9,421.50 Supplies-Community Center 39.00 Expenses 164.75 Light bulbs-Water Dept. 39.00 Mileage 51.00 Service-Valley View & Washington, Hidden Oaks 2,000.4: Equipment repair & parts 157.1; Radio equipment 1,612.0f2 Pipe-Water Dept. 201.41. Safety goggles-Park Maintenance 16.46 Equipment parts 45.45 Refund-Overnight Camp 9.00 Service-Tree debris 137.50 Board of Prisoners 3,225.0:' July bookings, equipment parts 402.4 Supplies-Water Dept. 75.1 1 Building code books-Fire Dept. 16.71 Supplies-Street Maintenance 297.0 , Equipment repair & parts 133.0. Expenses 64.9 , Twine, scredriver, bolts & nuts, hinges, bags 65.41 1 30 )age five ep )er 7, 1982 3610 JOE KASID 3611 SUZANNE KEARNS 3612 TOM KEEFE 3613 KNOX LUMBER COMPANY 3614 KEVIN M. KOHLS 3615 M.E. LANE, INC. 3616 LANG, PAULY & GREGERSON, LTD. 3617 LIEBERMAN ENTERPRISES INC. 3618 L.O.G.I.S. 3619 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR 3620 PATRICIA MALLOW 3621 ROBERT N. MARTZ 3622 METRO FONE COMMUNICATIONS 3623 METROPOLITAN FIRE EQUIPMENT 3624 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL 3625 MEYERS BROS. DAIRY INC. 3626 MIDLAND PRODUCTS COMPANY 3627 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION 3628 MILLER, DUNWIDDIE ARCHITECTS 3629 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY, INC. 3630 MINNESOTA CASH REGISTER CO. 3631 MINNESOTA GAS C6MPANY 36. MRPA TEAM REGISTRATION 3633 MINNESOTA TORO, INC. 3634 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC 3635 MINNETONKA POOLS, INC. 3636 MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE CODIFIERS 3637 N.A. COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL 3638 NATIONAL CITY BANK 3639 JERRY NEEDHAM 3640 NORTHERN STATES POWER 3641 NORTHERN STATES POWER 3642 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO. 3643 TOM O'BRIEN 3644 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE 3645 STEVEN M. OLSTAD 3646 SHARON OPHEIM 3647 OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 3648 BERT PANNING 3649 PERBIX, HARVEY & THORFINNSON 3650 PATRICK PEREZ 3651 RALPH PEREZ 3652 PERL SOD FARMS, INC. 3653 PHOTO QUICK 3654 TIM PIERCE & ASSOC. INC. 3655 POMMER MFG. CO ., INC. 36' POWER DYNAMICS INCORPORATED 36 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 3658 PRAIRIE OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. 3659 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING, INC. 3660 PREMIER CAR RENTAL 3661 CHERI PROVO 3662 CHUCK PUFAHL Softball official Refund-Fitness class Softball official Lumber-Park Maintenance Softball official Service Legal service L P records-Community Center July service Equipment parts-Park Maintenance Refund-Fitness class Expenses Service Maintenance agreement July SAC Charges Supplies-Rec Dept. Concession stand supplies Blacktop Service-Grill house Supplies-Liquor Stores Maintenance agr:ement, cash register tape Service Fee-Softball Filter, pins-Park Maintenance Service Supplies-Community Center Codification Light bulbs-Water Dept. Bond payment Instructor-Dog Obedience Service Service-Mitchell Road & Valley View Road Service Expenses Chain-Park Maintenance Mileage Refund-Fitness class Equipment parts-Street Maintenance Softball official Legal service Softball official Softball official Service-Round Lake & Riley Park Printing-Engineering Dept. Service-Schooner Blvd. Trophies-Rec Dept. Equipment parts Service-Round Lake Park, Senior Citizens Office supplies Printing-Election Car rental-Rec Dept. Softball official Softball official I '1J)? 165.00 25.00 213.00 151.62 • 247.00 10.00 90.00 30.10 3,067.41 125.18 25.00 217.65 202.59 473.95 , 30,294.00 43.12 309.95 9,870.49 416.50 60.35 71.75 2,260.8/1 64.00 80.6i 35.25 9.38 9,825.00 247.7s," 3,100.2s 200.00 19,768.30: 1,337.25' 1,025.9 15.00 27.13. 8.68 25.00 37.50 352.00 385.05 154.00 44.0f) 3,211.*Y 33.63 1,327.50 28.3/ 331.0: 23.6, 150.0 . 658.0 , 88.07 836.0 Page six Spp 5er 7, 1 982 3663 JIM PUFAHL 3664 R & R SPECIALTIES INC. 3665 RICK RABENORT 3666 CITY OF RICHFIELD 3667 ROBERTS DRUG 3668 ROOT-O-MATIC 3669 ST. REGIS PAPER COMPANY 3670 KATHY SCHUMACHER 3671 SHAKOPEE FORD INC. 3672 SHAKOPEE POLICE DEPARTMENT 3673 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 3674 BRIAN SIEVERTSON 3675 W. GORDON SMITH CO. 3676 SON OF A PRINTER 3677 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING INC. 3678 GUY SPEAKER COMPANY INC. 3679 SPORTS WORLD 3680 EMMET STARK 3681 STATE OF MINNESOTA/TREASURER 3682 DAVID STUTERBURY 3683 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CO. 3684 STEPHEN SULLIVAN 35- SULLIVANS SERVICES, INC. 368u SUPER VALU 3687 TARGET STORES 3688 CARRIE TIETZ 3689 DANNY L. TINS 3690 TRI-STATE TREE SERVICE, INC . 3691 TWIN CITY PRICING & LABEL, INC. 3692 TYPE HOUSE+DURAGRAPH 3693 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 3694 UP NORTH PLASTICS INC. 3695 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE, INC. 3696 VAN WATERS & ROGERS 3697 VAUGHN'S INCORPORATED 3698 VESSCO, INC. 3699 BECK! WARNER 3700 WARNER INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 3701 WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY 3702 PAUL M. WELIN 3703 WESCO 3704 JOSEPH A. WIETHOFF 3705 XEROX CORPORATION 3706 ZEP MANUFACTURING CO. 3707 COMNITY DANCE CENTER 3708 EDEN PRAIRIE SHOPPING NEWS 37" HASTINGS BUILDING CO. 3. J KRIS KRYSTOFIAK 3711 LANG, PAULY & GREGERSON, LTD. 3712 TERRY PETERSON 3713 KEVIN ROHE 3714 CHRIS ENGER 3715 VOID OUT CHECK Softball official Belt-Community Center Expenses Service-Cable T.V. Supplies-Rec Dept. Service-Park Lumber-Park Maintenance Test Equipment repair & parts Firing range rental Paint-Park Maintenance Softball official Oil, grease, fuel Printing-Rec Dept., & Police Dept. Legal ads, Happenings Equipment parts-Water Dept. Racquetball equipment rental Community Band Director Tests-Water Dept. Softball official Equipment repair & parts Mileage Service-Research Road Refund-Softball Supplies-Rec Dept. Service-Planning & Park & Rec minutes Softball official Equipment rental-Forestry Dept. Labels-Liquor Store/Prairie Village Mall Printing-Park Planning Uniforms-Public Safety Supplies Gas cyclinders-Community Center Chlorine-Water Dept. Flags-Election supplies Equipment repair & parts Mileage Paint-Park Maintenance Equipment parts-Water Dept. Softball official Lamp-Park Maintenance Softball official Service Chemical cleaners-Street Maintenance Instructor-Exercise classes Employment ad-Kids Korner Staring Lake Park Shelter Mileage Legal service Mileage Mileage Expenses 22.00 28.5C 10.80 2,500.01 40.87 74.00 7.4? 25.00 100.0t 100.0( 29.9!) 55.00 521.03 12.27 1,303.0'2 155.0(, 985.0C 400.00 270.1: 374.0( 862.5f 6.20 100.00 60.60 19.02 126.00 22.00 756.2!., 550.50 30.0( 455.20 9.00 171.9(, 716.4( 94.0" 447.4 1 20.7, 170.0( 2,621.P 44.0; 39.9 143.C' 1,651.F 89.3 79.9 19.8 29,124.0 41.0 1,603.( 24.f. 18.7 150.0 Pa g nen Septtfliber 7, 1982 3716 REBECCA PLOWMAN-HAHN Instructor-Tennis 465.00 3717 SANDY WERTS Mileage 53.85 TOTAL $704,299.81 . August 12, 1982 Mr. Carl Jullie City Manager 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Mr. Gene Dietz City Engineer 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 'I) Subject: (Non-Residential Use of Smetana Lane Gentlemen: We, the undersigned, do hereby protest and petition the City of Eden Prairie for relief from the non-residential truck use of Smetana Lane or any part thereof. We request that Smetana Lane be posted with a "NO TRUCK" sign and that resident concerns and complaints be given prompt attention. Smetana Lane is a rural, gravel residential road, approximately 17' wide, a dead-end without a cul-de-sac turn around at the end. Semi trucks occasionally enter looking for a delivery point and cannot turn around. The recent unilateral construction of a quarry access road from Smetana Lane and over Nine Mile Creek and adjacent flood plain is particularly disturbing. Use of Smetana Lane by trucks presents the following problems for the residents on Smetana Lane: 1. The road is just barely wide enough for cars to pass by. It is not wide enough for trucks. 2. Dust raised by trucks and noise from them is pollution and we cannot live with it. 3. Smetana Lane and County Road #39 is a school bus pick-up point. Currently, four young children would have to negotiate with trucks as they go to and from school. (16 August 12, 1982 City of Eden Prairie Page Two 4. Non-residential use is inconsistent with past use and the future plans of the residents on Smetana Lane. Please help us. F rink Smetan -1 Frank J. metana Marion L. Smetana cella Smetarld /444111- Clara Heath &W/1 L)/Vee-47( Marilyn H th 6-1774v4 7680 Smetana Lane, EP 7722 Smetana Lane, EP 7730 Smetana Lane,EP if Ji se 16?>1 -4211)441& ar`Ac-a-- 7665 SmetanaSmetana Lane, EP 7 7.3 4"— 941-2174 941-4656 941-1563 99V-41.7R 941-1937 as4o Rjr.m TIS A 1716-171..,1 fr kA. LB :11 M.2.16 August 20,1982 Ms. Jean Johnson City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Ms. Johnson, The Planned Unit Development approval for Northmark 4th Addition expired in July 1982. Originally, we planned to initiate construction prior to the expiration date. However, construction has been much lower than anticipated. Therefore, we hereby request the Mayor and City Council extend approval for Northmark 12 additional months. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Cordially, Hans T. Hagen, Jr. President /pa 2353 Rice Street North St Paul Minnesota 55113 Phone (6121 483.0801 We Build Dreams. MEMORANDUM TO: THRU: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Carl Jullie, City Manager Sandy Worts, Recreation Supervisor September 3, 1982 Resolution Recognizing SUNBONNET DAY as an Official Civic Celebration in Eden Prairie September 19 will be the date of the third annual SUNBONNET DAY celebration sponsored by the Historical and Cultural Commission. Besides focussing on the fun and games of an old fashioned community celebration, the Commission also wishes to raise funds to support the development of the two historic homes the City owns. In order to raise money from the event, there must be Some activities that generate a lot of money. One of the activities the Commission is considering is bingo. I checked with Captain Keith Wall to see what the necessary arrangements would be to sponsor bingo. He checked over the o?inion he received from the City Attorney's office. According to Captain Wall, a government agency may conduct a bingo game if the event at which the gama is being' played is recognized as an "official" civic celebration. Since this is the third consecutive year the Commission has sponsored SUNBONNET DAY, people are starting to recognize the event. It is the Commission's intention to continue with the event as long as it has community support. Bingo will be one of the many activities going on and will not be given any more publicity than the other activities. Bingo is a game that is enjoyed by every age group and is a proven money raiser. The Commission would like the option to include this activity. Whether or not the City Council feels bingo is an appropriate activity for a community event, the Commission would like SUNBONNET DAY recognized as an official community celebration in Eden Prairie. SW:md CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 82-221 RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING SUNBONNET DAY AS AN OFFICIAL CIVIC CELEBRATION IN EDEN PRAIRIE WHEREAS, The Historical and Cultural Commission is an official advisory commission of the City of Eden Prairie, and WHEREAS, one of the purposes and responsibilities of the Historical and Cultural Commission is to review and develop historical and cultural programs, and WHEREAS, the Commission annually sponsors SUNBONNET DAY, which is an "old fashioned" event focusing on the early history of Eden Prairie, and WHEREAS, the Commission wishes to continue this celebration as a way of focusing the community's attention on Eden Prairie's past and as an opportunity to financially support the City's two historical buildings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie recognizes SUNBONNET DAY as an official civic celebration in Eden . Prairie. • ADOPTED, 1.), the Eden Prairie City Council this 7th day of September, 1982. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL Wow 0 >IN simmi 11E011 and avenue • minnesota 55423 richfield AUG 2 3 1982 August 19, 1982 Mr. Carl Jyllie City Manager 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Carl: The Southwest Suburban Cable Commission adopted a proposed budget for 1982 and 1983 at their meeting on August 18, 1982. The Joint Powers Agreement be- tween the five cities indicates that the budget pro- cess for 1982 and 1983 are as follows: Chapter XI, Section 7, A. Budaet Process for Balance of 1982, "Within 30 days after the effective date of this AgreemenL, the Commission shall prepare and submit to the Parties a budget for the balance of 1982. This budget shall become effective upon approval by a majority of the Parties." B. Budget Process for Subsequent Years. "A proposed budget for sub- sequent years shall be formulated and approved by the Commission and submitted to the Parties on or before August 1 of each year. No budget shall become effective unless approved by resolution of the Councils of a majority of the Parties. If any Council approves a proposed budget prior to notice having been received by its Directors of the withdrawal of any Party (which may be done by notice given prior to October 1 of any year) that approval shall not be binding on that Party, but that Council may reconsider such prior approval of the budget. All parties shall endeavor to approve the proposed budget on or before November of each year. If the budget is not approved, the commission shall promptly formulate a revised budget and submit it to the Parties for their review and approval. This process shall be continued until a budget is approved. The Parties shall use their best efforts to approve a budget for the then succeeding year by December 31 of each year." The Southwest Suburban Cable Commission has proposed a budget for 1982 in the amount of $35,210, with the telephone:86945 2 1(612) an equal opportunity employer detail of the expenditures and revenues as indicated on the attached statement. In addition, the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission has proposed a budget for 1983 of $58,214 with detail of expenditures and revenues as shown on the attached statement. It is necessary for a majority of the parties to approve both the 1982 and 1983 budgets. The 1982 budget needs to be approved as soon as possible with the 1983 budget to be approved by November 1, 1982. To that end, I would request that you have your city councils give consideration to approval of the 1982 budget in the near future. It is necessary for us to have approval of that budget prior to hiring a cable coordinator. If you have any questions concerning the process, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely yours, Karl Nollenberger Secretary/Treasurer Southwest Suburban Cable Commission 110 il(9 1 $25,,2174 2,500 1,000 17,600 REVENUES BOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION PROPOSED BUDGET 1982 and 1983 1982 Initial Contributions: Eden Prairie Edina Hopkins Minnetonka Richfield Subtotal Equal Contributions: Eden Prairie ( 1) Edina (18) i:cpkins (13) Minnetonka ;22) Richfield (45) Subtotal Total Revenues EXPENDITURES Recruitment and Selection Advertisements S 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 12,500 227 4,038 2,952 4,996 10,447 22,710 $35,210 $ 100 1933 $ 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 12,500 457 8,229 5,943 10,059 2 1.Z.1214_ 4A5,1147 $18..at. $ -0 - Commission Expenses Meeting Expenses 200 Conferences/Schools (Annual Convention) 1,200 Membership CTIC 850 Subtotal 2,250 200 1,300 900 2,400 Personnel & Associated Costs Cable Coordinator Salary ($25,000 annual) Retirement Social Security PERA/Deferred Comp Insurance Mileage (15 mile/day) Expenses Clerical Support (150 hours) Postage/ Reproduction Subtotal Office Rental Other Legal Counsel Consultants/General Insurance/Public Official & General Liability WC/Unemployment Scnds Annual Report Annual Audi: ;Commission/Review of Ccmpany Audit) Quality/Performance Check Subtotal Tctal Fxpenditures 26,800 1,814 1,500 1,400 700 400 1,600 300 177711- 500 10,000 5,000 1,000 600 200 500 2,500 1,000 20,300 S58,214 10,500 700 700 500 360 200 1,500 300 14,760 500 10,000 2,000 1,000 400 200 500