HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 02/02/1982 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUt IL
IUESUAY, FEBRUARY 2, 1982 7:30 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: t, Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Dean
Edstrom, Paul Redpath and George Tangen
COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl Jullie; City Attorney Roger
Pauly; Finance Director John Franc; Planning
q ' Director Chris Enger; Director of Community
Services Bob Lambert; Director of Public Works
Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen
"f Michael
i
INVOCATION: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel
3
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
A. Joint City_ Council1Development Commission Meeting held Tues.,Jan.19, 1982 Pg. 206
B. Rular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, January 19, 1982 Pg. 2Ut> i
�. Special City_Council Meeting held Tuesdey,January 26, f98E Pg. 23E
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List Pg. 218
B. Final�lat�proval for Eden Prairie Center 3rd Addition wank site P9• 22''
at northeast corner of TH 169%Schooner Blvd —(Resolution No.
82-31�-------- -
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Mitchell Lakes Fstates 2nd Addition by Karl Peterson. Request to Pg. 22:;
revise the CDR PUD , rezone from Planned Study to Office, and preliminary g.
plat 3 lots on approximately 4.21 acres, for construction s
of 3 office buildings. Located in the southwest quadrant of TH 5 F
and Co. Rd. 4 behind Superamerica Gas Station (Resolution No. j.
82-25 - PUD; Ordinance No. 82-03 - Rezoning; and Resolution No.
82-26 - Preliminary Plat)
i
B. Public Hearin on�roposed improvements on Mitchell Road and Pg. 231
T fill—o (Resolution
y Drive L I.C. 52-U10 No. 82-32, ordering
improvements
C. Removal of diseased elm trees from private property (Resolution Pg. 239;'
i _
D. Request for Municipal Industrial Devel_Ument Bonds in the amount Pg. 24`
of $2,RDO,000.00 for Twin City Ciirist.ian Homes TResolution No.
82-3D) — ——
1
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,February 2, 1982
E. Adoption of City Comprehensive Guide Plan and Housing Assistance Plan Pg. 261
Resolution No. 82-VT
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 10216 - 10379 Pg. 263
VI. REPDRTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS A COMMUNICATIONS f
A. Request to set Public Hearin for February 16, 19B2 for Liquor P 267
License submitted by Abb;�Restaurant Enterprisesg�
VIII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. Final_approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds it the amount Pg P69
of$2,000,000.00 for Parker-Hannifin
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS 8 COMMIS'SIONS
A. Reports of Council Member
8. Report of City Attorney
C. Report of City Manager
1. Set Public Hearing for review of 19B2 budget adjustments
2. Update on Landfill expansion proposal Pg. 281
3. Discussion of Richfield/Eden Prairie combined police dispatching Pg. 288
X. NEW BUSINESS
XI. ADJOURNMENT.
City of Eden Prairie j
i
Resolution N 82-33
(
y
Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that a !
special election be held on March 16, 1982 for the purpose of submitting #
to the voters the following question:
"Shall the City of Eden Prairie continue to operate its
municipal liquor store?"
The city clerk shall give two weeks published notice and 10 days posted
notice prior to the election. The polls at the following locations shall
be open at 7:00 a.m. and shall close at 8:00 p.m.
1 King of Glory Luthern Church
17850 Duck Lake Trail
2 Immanuel Lutheran Church
16515 Luther Way
3 Forest Hills Elementary School )
13708 Holly Road 4'
4 Eden Prairie Methodist Church
15050 Scenic Heights Road
5 Eden Prairie Presbyterian Church
11609 Leona Road
6 Vo-Tech School
9200 Flying Cloud Drive
The clerk shall cause printed ballots to be prepared in sustantially
the following form:
OFFICIAL BALLOT
SPECIAL ELECTION
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
MARCH 16, 1982
Instructions to Voters: Voters desiring to vote in
favor of the following question shall put and (X) in
the square before the word "YES." Voters desiring
to vote against the question shall put an (X) in the
square before the word "NO."
YES Shall the City of Eden Prairie
continue to operate its municipal
NO liquor store?
MINUTES
NAPPROVED
JOINT CITYUCOUNCIL/DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
TUESDAY, JANUARY 19, 1982 6:30 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, George Bentley, Dean
Edstrom, Paul Redpath and George Tangen
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chairman Tim Pierce, Joe Adams, Bill Behrenbrinker,
Kent Barker, Robert Hanson, Donald Opheim, and Roy
Terwilliger
COUNCIL AND COMMISSION STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie; Finance Director John
0. Frane; William Fahey of Ehlers and Associates,
Inc.; William R. McGrann, Richard Graves, and Arlin
B. Waelti of O'Connor & Hannan; and Recording Sec-
retary Karen Michael
ROLL CALL: Bill Behrenbrinker was absent
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
There were no additions to the Agenda.
II. REVIEW OF PROPOSAL TO CREATE A RESERVE FUND VEHICLE WITH RESPECT TO INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONGS
William R. McGrann from the O'Connor & Hannan firm gave an overview of the
reserve fund vehicle with respect to industrial development revenue bonds.
The O'Connor & Hannan firm has been working with several cities on this
approach.
Dick Graves of O'Connor & Hannan noted this type of fund is similar to that
which has been used very successfully by the St. Paul Port Authority.
Arlin Waelti, also of O'Connor & Hannan, spoke to the benefits of this tool
to the City noting it creates a public/private partnership. What this reserve
system will do is: 1) allow development to occur sooner than it normally would;
2) allow a city to manage its development; and 3) allow a city to be competative.
The city which has a reserve system of this type will be able to offer IOB's
at a lower interest rate -- a city will end up getting a rated industrial revenue
bond. This makes it a very viable tool for small companies. Graves noted that
Congress would like to limit the "Fortune 1,000" companies from being able to
use IRDB's.
COUNCIUDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION -2- January 19, 1982
Graves further explained the intricacies of the system.
Discussion followed on the mechanics of this type of bonding.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to direct Staff to look into the
proposal as outlined by Graves and Waelti. Motion carried unanimously.
III. NEW BUSINESS
There was none. '
IV. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adjourn the meeting at 7:28 p.m.
Motion carried unanimously.
i
i
a
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JANUARY 19, 1982 7:30 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, George Bentley, Dean
Edstrom, Paul Redpath and George Tangen
COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City Attorney Roger
Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Planning
Director Chris Enger, Director of Community Services
Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A.
Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael
INVOCATION: Councilman George Bentley
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: all were present
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following items were added to the Agenda: X. A. 1. Bentley: Eden Prairie
Chamber of Commerce Housinn Committee Report; X. C. 1. Petition for Speed Limit
Re u� ction on County Road 1; and X. D. 5. Grand 0 ening of Community Center.
The following change was made: IX. A. Resolution calling for sale of bonds
for February 16, 19B2 - change date to March 2, 1982,
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Agenda as amended
and published. Motion carried unanimously.
II. MINUTES
A. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday January 5, 1982
p. 3. para. 6, line 2: change "topographic high" to "hill
p. 3. para. 8, beginning with line 1: change "roadway shown as a long cul-de-
sac to Townline Road. This could also be used for construction traffic in a late,
phase." to read "main road rough grading as shown as a connection to Townline
Road. This could also be used for construction traffic and completed at a
later phase."
p. 3., last para— line 2: change "make" to "require;" and also p. 3.
last para., the following added before the last sentence: Penzel requested
review of grading plans which substantially would reduce cuts and fills and
respect the natural character of the site to a greater extent."
j
r
i
.2o
City Council Minutes -2- January 19, 1982
P. 7, para. 7, line 3: change the period following "Eden Prairie" to a
comma and add "but printed in Shakopee."
p. 7. para. 8, line 4: add an asterisk following "The Shopper"* and the
following paranthetical ,phrase at the bottom of the page "(which is distributed
free of charge to all known non-subscribing residents of Eden Prairie.)"
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the minutes of the
January 5, 1982, regular Council meeting as anended and published. Motion
carried unanimously.
B. Minutes of the Special City. Council Meeting held Tuesday, January 12, 1982
p. 2., reference to p. 31: add "including fees for such I.D.s."
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to approve the minutes of the
Special Council meeting held Tuedsday, January 12, 1982, as amended and
published. Motion carried unanimously.
11I. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. _Ap�roval�of Kinder-Care Learning Center Developer's Agreement for a day care
in anT office district located north of T{1 5 and east of Chester's Restaurant
® C. Receive feasibility report for Autumn hoods Phase I and adjacent proper,
and set Public Heariu_for Febru� 16, 1982, at 7:30 p.m., I.C. 52-016A.
Located south of Rymarland Camp and east of TH 101 Resolution No. 82-18)
D. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 82-02, relating to the operation of snowmobiles
and amending Ordinance No. 148
E. Red Cross Request
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve items A - E on the
Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Feasibility of Major Center Area roadway improvements, Valley View Road and
Schooner Boulevard, Inyrovement Contracts: 5I-308A, 51-308C, 51-335, 51- O04
and 51-398 Resolution No. 82-07, ordering improvements; Resolution No. 82-12
- EAW, negative declaration)
City Manager Jullie said official notice of the Public Hearing had been pub-
lished in the Eden Prairie News on January 7 and again on January 14, 1982.
Copies of the notice had been mailed to all property owners whose names appear
on the preliminary assessment rolls.
a�9
City COLH1Cil Minutes -3- January 19, 1982
Jullie introduced representatives from the consulting engineering firms,
Gary Erickson of Bennett, Ringrose, Wolsfeld, Jarvis, Gardner, Inc. (BRW)
( and Peter Knaeble of Rieke, Carroll, Muller Associates Inc. (RCM), who
were present to answer questions.
Director of Public Works Eugene Dietz gave an overview of the project; out-
lining various phases of the proposal, costs, and timelines.
Penzel called attention to the letters which had been received regarding
this project (these letters are attached to the minutes): William J. Bearman,
Walter S. Carpenter (Minnesota Tree), Minnesota Vikings, and a phone message
from Charles Blesener.
Mary Prochaska, Menard's, questioned the Menard's assessment. Dietz said he
would check on this and noted dimensions were taken from records which will
be further checked.
Dick Vohnoutka, 8541 Flying Cloud Drive, had questions about the property
across TH 169 from his. Dietz explained this was included in a different
project area from the Vohnoutka property and that is why that information
was not included in the information sent to him. Vohnoutka asked how many
single family homeowners were included in the assessment area. Dietz said
26 were included. Vohnoutka questioned right-of-way acquisition. Jullie
explained some of the property would be donated.
Bill Bearman, 9955 Valley View Road, questioned the benefit he would receive
from the improvements being made to Valley View Road. He also asked when
the assessment hearing for this project would be held. Jullie said the first
assessment hearing may be this Fall depending on how much progress has been
made; Fall of 1983 would be the latest. Jullie noted that existing homesteaded
single family homes are proposed to be excluded from the assessment district
until development/rezoning, with interest accruing not to exceed 50% of the
principal. Bearman asked when the projects would be completed. Dietz said
those begun in the Spring of 1982 should be operable in 1983.
Ralph Nesbitt, representing the Eden Prairie Presbyterian Church, questioned
how the Church would benefit from the ring route. Penzel said the concept
is that improved access to the Major Center Area will benefit all the proper-
ties in the area whether they are commercial or not. Penzel added that a letter
from the Church Board might be in order expressing its views and concerns.
Joe Lawler, 7621 Ontario Boulevard, asked what the plans are for Valley View
Road west of Mitchell Road. Penzel said the City's transportation plan since
1968 has shown Valley View Road as a major thoroughfare/collector street from
the eastern boundary to the western boundary of Eden Prairie; however, the
matter of financing has precluded this improvement especially since the rail-
road bridge would be very costly.
Pete Rasmussen, 13100 Valley View Road, asked about access to the area in
which he lives.
Tom Vohnoutka, 8591 Flying Cloud Drive, asked about the single family home
deferment. Dietz noted single family homes are proposed to be excluded from
the assessment district until development or rezoning occurs. Interest would i
accrue during this period, but would not exceed 50% of the principal.
City Council Minutes -4- January 19, 1982
Dick Vohnoutka asked why the residential properties are being assessed at
the same rate as the coirmrercial when only the commercial properties will
benefit from the improvements. Penzel explained Schooner Boulevard had been
paid for by those benefiting from that improvement. Redpath noted the prop-
erties adjacent to the Major Center Area will be more valuable once the
improvements under discussion are made and this must be taken into consideration.
MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Bentley, to close the Public Hearing and
to adopt Resolution No. 82-07, ordering improvements 51-308A, 51-308C, 51-335,
51-340A and 51-398, utility and street improvements on Valley View Road and
Schooner Boulevard. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Edstrom raved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt Resolution No. 82-12,
finding the environmental assessment worksheet for MCA Road improvements
does not require an environmental impact statement. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Vacation of 72nd Street West between County Poad 4 and Duck Lake Road
resolution No. 82-17)
Director of Public Works Dietz addressed the rationale for vacating West
72nd Street between County Road 4 and Duck Lake Road,
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to close the Public Hearing
and to adopt Resolution No. 82-17, vacating a portion of 72nd Street West
between Country Road 4 and Duck Lake Road. Motion carried unanimously.
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 9989 - 10215
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve Payment of Claims Nos.
9989 - 10215. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen and Penzel
voted "aye" with Edstrom abstaining on Claims Nos. 10116 and 10132.
VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
A. Human Rights & Services Commission_ - Confirmation of appointments to the
Human Service Needs Board.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to confirm the appointment
of the following people to the Human Service Needs Board: Marcia Lockman,
Larry Simenson, Keith Scott, Curt Connaughty, Pat Breitenstein, Lee Wenzel,
Mary Hayden, and Jan Flynn. Motion carried unanimously.
VII. APPOINTMENTS
A. Suburban Rate Authority. - Appointment of 2 Representatives to the Suburban
Tate Aut ority 1 Representative as Director and the other Alternate Direc-
tor) Resolution No. 82-22
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt Resolution No. 82-22,
designating John D. Frane as a Director of the Suburban Rate Authority and
Dr. George Tangen as Alternate Director of the Suburban Rate Authority for
the year 1982. Motion carried unanimously.
� Il
City Council Minutes -5- January 19, 1982
VIII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
t. A. Eden Prairie Center 3rd Addition by Bar Mil Search Group. Request for PUD
Devciopvent Plan approval and preliminary plat approval of Lot 3 zoned C-
Reg-Ser into 3 lots and construction of a bank facility on 1 of the lots.
Located north of Schooner Boulevard and west of the Franlo Road entrance
to the Eden Prairie Shopping Center (Resolution No. 82-21)
David Shea representing Bar Mil Search Group presented the proposal
to the Council.
i
Planning Director Enger said the Planning Commission had reviewed the proposal
at its January 11, 1982 meeting and had voted (7-0) to recommend its approval
subject to the recommendations contained in the January 8, 1982, Staff Report.
In addition the Planning Commission recommended the building be a bank facility
only.
Penzel asked what prospective uses are to the west of this site. Enger said
the original PUD intends a commercial center to the west of this parcel; to
the northwest a grocery store is shown.
Bentley inquired if this approval is for the one parcel or for the larger
area. Enger explained it is a request for an amendment to the PUD.
Tangen asked if the parking was consistent with other facilities of this
type. Enger said it is.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt Resolution No. 82-21,
approving the preliminary plat of Eden Prairie Center 3rd Addition. Motion
carried unanimously.
B. County Road 60 by Hennepin County. Request for plan approval for County Road
60 Project No. 15), from County Road 39 to Valley View Road (Resolution No.
82-19)
Director of Public Works Dietz spoke to the proposed changes to be made
by the County in this project. Vern Genzlinger, Hennepin County Department
of Transportation, was present to answer questions.
Fred Hoisington, representing St. Andrew Church, noted the Church's interest
in the project. Pastor Rod Anderson was also present.
Genzlinger said the bids would be let June 15, 1982 and the County would hope
the project would be completed by Winter.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution 82-19,
approving plans for CSAH 60 from CSAH 39 to Valley View Road. Motion carried
unani .cusly.
j
L,
212
City Council Minutes -6- January 19, 1982
IX. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution calling for sale of bonds for March 2, 1982 (Resolution No. 82-23)
William Fahey of Ehlers and Associates, Inc. addressed the Council regard-
ing the bond sale. He noted the plan which the Council had previously
adopted had a proposed cost of $19,075,000; the plan being proposed this
evening has an estimated cost of $18,878,000, The capitalized interest
in "The Plan" adopted by the Council was $3,800,000; tonight's proposal
is $3,543,750. Total project cost per "The Plan" was $22,875,000; per this
proposal it is $22,421,750. Fahey noted the plan as presented this evening
proposes the sale of $18,000,000 in general obligation tax increment bonds
to finance $18,878,000 of capital costs. The maturity schedule for this I
issue will cover the years 1985-2000. It is Fahey's opinion the issue will
require insurance -- the primary benefit of which will be the City's ability
to attain a AAA rating by Standard and Poor's and an A rating by Moody's. {
The insurance will cost 3/4 of 1% of the principal and interest with the !
premium estimated to be $318,000. The cost of the premium will be saved, plus
an additional 1/2-3/4 of 1% with the AAA rating. The insurance will almost
guarantee the sale of the bonds which is important since the bond market is
not good at this time. Fahey noted the security for these bonds is the
tax increments, the two mill tax levy, the $3,363,000 in special assessments,
and the City's general obligation pledge. In addition, tax increments from
future development would be used and have not been taken into account.
Edstrom asked about the redemption dates. Fahey said we would reserve
the right to call any of the bonds in 1989 in inverse order.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution 82-239
calling for the sale of bonds on March 2, 1982. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Tangen, to provide insurance for the
bonds, the premium for which will be 3/4 of 1% of the principal and interest
or approximately $318,000. Motion carried unanimously.
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Report of Council Members
1. Bentley: Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce Housing Committee Report ;.
Bentley called the Council's attention to the Report which had been
released this week. He recommended the Report be forwarded on to the
recently appointed Housing Task Force which will meet on January 20.
MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Redpath, to forward the Eden Prairie
Chamber of Commerce Housing Committee Report on to the Housing Task
Force and to thank the Chamber and the Committee for its work on the
Report. Motion carried unanimously.
Z I?i
City Council Minutes -7- January 19, 1982
B. Report of City Attorney
City Attorney Pauly reported on the communication he had received from
the attorney for the Prairie Register protesting the appointment of the
Eden Prairie News as the City's official newspaper. Pauly said he had
spoken to the attorneys for both newspapers and requested they both
submit evidence toward the factual requirements of the Statutues which I
were discussed. Pauly hopes to have this material evaluated by the first i
meeting in February.
C. Report of City Manager
1. Petition for Speed Limit Reduction on County Road 1 (Resolution No. 82-24)
City Manager Jullie said a petition had been received from the Mill
Creek Townhouse Association Directors asking appropriate action be
taken to lower the speed limit on Pioneer Trail (Hennepin County 1)
between TH 169 and County Road 18. Jullie noted appropriate action
in this case would be to request a study by the County.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt Resolution No.
82-24, requesting a speed survey and related studies for County Road
1 from'TH 169 to County Road 18. Motion carried unanimously.
D. Report of Director of Community Services
1. City Trail System Plan Update (continued from 12/1/81)
Director of Community Services Lambert called attention to the Plan
for the City's Trail System which was included in the Council packet.
Bentley asked if the trails could be color coded on the map which will
be made available to City residents. Lambert said it would be.
Tangen inquired about a trail connection between Cardinal Creek and
the Topview area. Lambert said none had been formally resolved. Tangen
said he would like to see this connection made.
Bentley expressed concern that some trails cross streets. He would
like to see consistency. Lambert said this is attempted, but in some
areas it is not possible due to topography, acquisition problems (cost),
or various other factors.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to adopt the City Trail
System Plan Update. Motion carried unanimously.
I
21�I
City Council Minutes -8- January 19, 1982
2. Neiyhborhood Park Shelter Program (continued from 12/1/81)
Director of Community Services Lambert stated the architect had a pre-
vious engagement and could not be at tonight's meeting. Lambert outlined
the various proposals for neighborhood park shelters. At its January 18,
1982 meeting the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission voted
to recommend the mid-range ($20,000) shelter which could be adapted for
expansion in the future.
The merits of each of the shelter options were discussed.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to accept the recommendation
of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resouces Commission and to enter into
an agreement with the rchitect to have him design a neighborhood park
shelter with four variations, each with an estimated cost of $20,000.
Motion carried unanimously.
3. Tax Forfeited Lands (Resolution No. 82-20) '
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt Resolution No.
82-20, authorizing the acquisition of tax forfeited land for public
open space and road right-of-way. Motion carried unanimously.
4. Staring Lake Park Shelter
Director of Community Services Lambert reported the Parks, Recreation
&Natural Resouces Commission had approved the schematic design for the
Staring Lake Park Shelter at its meeting last evening.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the schematic
design and authorize the architect to proceed with plans and specifica-
tions for the Staring Lake Park Shelter. Motion carried unanimously.
5. Grand Opening of Community Center
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Penzel, to schedule the Grand Opening
of the Eden Prairie Community Center for February 28, 1982, from 1-4 p.m.
Motion carried unanimously.
XI. NEW BUSINESS
There was none.
X. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to adjourn the meeting at 9:58 p.m.
Motion carried unanimously.
i
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 26, 1982 7:30 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, George Bentley, Dean
Edstrom, Paul Redpath and George Tangen
COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City Attorney Roger
Pauly, and Captain Keith Wall
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Edstrom, to approve the Agenda as published.
Motion carried unanimously.
II. CONTINUED DISCUSSION ON CODIFICATION - CHAPTERS 4 THROUGH 9
The Council proceeded with detailed review of Chapter 5, pages 27-end, Chapters
6, 7 and 8. Staff noted changes requested by Council, including the following
general items:
Chapter 5
The Council received a memo dated January 19, 1982 from Codifier Rodger Jensen
relating to, among other items: 1) rearrangement of Chapter 2; 2) handicapped
parking signs; 3) adoption of the Uniform Fire Code; and 4) proposed "Peddlers"
license provisions. Also received was a memo dated January 18, 1982 from Karen
Michael regarding a Liquor License Fee Survey.
Subd. 5 of the "Peddler" section relating to bond requirements was deleted.
Section 5.39 regarding food establishments, etc. was referred to City Attorney.
p. 47, Section 5.40 "Bartender's license" to be moved into Chapter 4.
p. 48, Section 5.41 "Kennels" - add dog license provisions here.
Chapter 6
Roger Pauly to verify that Ordinance 119 is consistent with Sec. 6.07.
Chapter 7
p. 7, Subd. 4. A. -check reference to State Law.
Omit Sec. 7.07.
a r c,
City Council Minutes -2- January 26, 1982
Chapter 8
{ p. 2, Sec. 8.02 - add no parking within 3' beyond edge of any driveway,
except on cul-de-sacs. �.
p. 8. Use Ord. 79-43 in lieu of Sec. 8.13, 8.14 and 8.15.
The section on junk cars in Chapter 2 (2.80) should be moved to Chapter 8.
Finished Chapter 8.
III. NEW BUSINESS �.
MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Tangen, to schedule the next meeting to
review the Code for Thursday, February 11, 1982, at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
IV. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adjourn the meeting at 10:00 p.m.
Motion carried unanimously.
CITY DF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
February 2, 1982
CONTRACTOR MULTI_FAMILY & COMMd PLUMBING LCon'd.)
Balco Building Systems, Inc. Richfield Plumbing Co.
Elder-Jones, Inc. Rivard Plumbing & Heating
Franklin Construction Schulties Plumbing, Inc.
Galaxy Builders, Inc. Solar Mechanical
Lester's of Minnesota Solar Resources Intl. of Minn.
Magney Construction Co. Solberg Plumbing
Richard Miller Homes, Inc. Dale Sorenson Co.
George H. Ries, Jr. Thompson Plumbing Co.
Shelard Companies, Inc. Wenzel Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
James Steel Construction Co.
Welsh Construction Corp. HEATING & VENTILATING
CONTRACTORS 1 & 2 FAMILY Berghorst Plumbing & Heating
- - A. Binder & Son, Inc.
BoMac, Inc. Blaine Plumbing & Heating
Bruce Bren Homes C. 0. Carlson Air Conditioning
Centex Homes Midwest, Inc. Central Air Conditioning & Heating
Developers Construction,Inc. Commercial Air Conditioning, Inc.
Elfering Construction Co. H. Conrad Mfg. Co.
Kee Construction, Inc. Cronstrom's Heating & Air Conditioning
John Kraemer & Sons, Inc. Del Air Conditioning, Inc.
Stephen Longman Builders Dronen's Beating & Air Conditioning
C. W. Morris Construction Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc.
Schlee Builders Hoglund Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
The Sussel Company Horwitz Mechanical, Inc.
T & E Construction Kleve Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.
Teri Homes, Inc. Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors
Drrin Thompson Homes Modern Heating & Air Conditioning
Western Construction Co. D'Keefe Mechanical, Inc.
Woodsmen Builders of Minn. , Inc. Palen-Kimball Co.
Rainbow Mechanical
PLUMBING Seasonal Control Co.
--— Fred Vogt And Co.
Berghorst Plumbing & Heating
Blaylock Plumbing Co. GAS FITTER
Lance Coppin Sewer & Water
Galaxy Mechanical Contractors A. Binder & Son, Inc.
Groth Water & Sewer Commercial Air Conditioning, Inc.
Hoglund Mechanical Contractors Cronstrom's Heating & Air Conditioning
Horwitz Mechanical, Inc. Del Air Conditioning
Hovde Plumbing & Heating Hoglund Mechanical Contractors
Jim's Plumbing Service Kleve Heating & Air Conditioning
London Plumbing Co., Inc. Loop Belden Porter, Inc.
Loop Belden Porter, Inc. Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors
McQuire Plumbing & Heating Seasonal Control Co.
Metropolitan Mechanical Cont. Fred Vogt and Co.
Minnesota Mechanical, Inc. Wenzel Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Nova Frost, Inc.
Rainbow Mechanical
® CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
page two
WELL DRILLING RETAIL CANDY
Dependable Well Co. PDQ Food Store
Donald A. Rogers
TYPE B FOOD
UTILITY INSTALLER
——---- PDQ FOOD STORE
Nova Frost, Inc.
Thompson Plumbing Co. TYPE C FOOD_
United Water & Sewer Co.
PDQ Food Store
VENDING MACHINES
A & J Enterprises PRIVA_T_E_ KENNEL LICENSE
American Aviation
Canteen Co. Of Minnesota Harold W. Jenkins
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. E. J. Renier
CPT Corporation
Laserdyne Corp. SOLICITDR
PDQ Food Store
Powers Dept. Store Michael Gordon Gerling - Firewood
® Servomation Corp.
Twin City Vending
CIGARETTES
A & J Enterprises
Canteen Co. of Minnesota
Terrific Lunch Company
Twin City Vending
3.2 BEER ON-SALE
Terrific Lunch Company
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible
for the licensed activity.
f Pat Solie, Licensing Clerk
j
s .
�19
February 5, 1982
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNLSOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R82••-31
�r,• A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
OF EDEN PRAIRIE CENTER 3rd ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of Eden Prairie Center 3rd Addition has been sub-
mitted in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance
Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been
duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and
the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordin-
ances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEO BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EOEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat Approval Request for Eden Prairie Center 3rd Addition is appruvu
upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
Report on this plat dated January 25, 1982.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Ordinance No. 93, Sec. 8,
Subd. 1 waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the
approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final
plat as described in said Engineer's Report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of
this resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Regis-
trar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3.
0. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy
of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named
plat.
E. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute
the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon com-
pliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTEO by the City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penze , Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
1� John 0. rane, WerK
:Ll f�
r
CITY OF LOIN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: Dave Olson, Engineering Technician ov,
DATE: January 25, 1982
SUBJECT: Eden Prairie Center 3rd Addition
PROPOSAL: The developer, Bar Mil Corp., is requesting City Council
approval of the final plat of Eden Prairie Center 3rd Addition. The
plat consists of three lots and is a replat of Lot 1, Block 1, Eden
Prairie Center 2nd Addition, located in the northeast quadrant of
Flying Cloud Drive and Schooner Boulevard. The intended use of this
subdivision is C-Reg-Ser District.
HISTORY: PUD approval for the Eden Prairie Center was received in 1973.
The preliminary plat covering this addition was approved on December 5,
1978, per Council Resolution No. 78-216.
Zoning to C-Reg-Ser was finally read and approved by the City Council
on January 16, 1979, per Ordinance No. 78-56.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed
on January 15, 1979.
The final plat of Eden Prairie Center 2nd Addition was approved by
the City Council on March 29, 1979, per Resolution No. 79-56.
VARIANCES: A variance from the requirements of Ordinance No. 93, Sec. B,
Subd. 1, waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval
date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be
necessary.
All other variance requests must be processed through the Board of
Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: All utilities and roadways installed within this
addition will be privately owned and maintained.
PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in
the Developer's Agreement.
22�
- 2 -
BONDING: .Bonding requirements are covered in the Developer's Agreement.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Eden Prairie Center
3rd Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Develop-
er's Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of fee for City Engineering services in the
amount of $100.00.
DLO:kh
j
r
i
i
12Z
approved
Planning Commission Minutes -3-
January 25, 1982
ALL MEMBERS PRESENT
C. FIITCHELL LAKE ESTATES 2.ND ADDITION, by Karl Peterson. Request
tc revise Lhe COR P_UD, pre1iininary plat 3 lots on approximately
4.2.1 acres and rezone from Planned Study to Office, for construe
Lion of 3 office buildings with variances. Located in the south-
west quadrant of TH 5 and Co. Rd. 4 west of Superamerica Gas
Station. A public hearing.
The Planner stated that this Darcel is annrnvail tnriate for 48 apartment units.
It was then revised to include approximately 25,000 sq. ft. of office space on
the northern portion of the site and 64 units of elderly housing on the southern
portion which was approved by the City Council and given first reading. However,
2nd reading was never given because the owner never signed the developer's agree-
ment. Karl Peterson has a contract-for-deed or purchase agreement for this site
and is proposing to develop it as low-density office which would have the same
amount of traffic as the approved plan. -He stated that Superamerica has had some
problems obtaining access from the public road planned in the area. Superamerica
is now nt he road.
proposaloandnstateded in that LeeeJohnson��wasto tpresent tot{giveen reviewed th6 current
a presentation.
Johnson stated,that access has been placed at the west end directly across the
access for the bank as a right-in/right-out only. He stated that all 3 lots will
have access to the cul-de-sac road. Parking for the entire site is 1 over the
required amount but when it is broken down per building, the site is short 1 space.
He stated that Dr. 8onnett currently has a veterinary clinic across from Eden
Prairie Center and has at the most, 3-4 cars parked at a time. He stated that
individual landscaping around the buildings would occur at time of building permit
issuance.
The Planner stated that he was concerned with the access and stated that the
original intent was to access from Terrey Pine Drive, or Superamerica. He stated
that Terrey Pine Drive is expected to continue west to other property. He stated
that he wants all land-locked parcels un-land-locked which is the reason for
recommending that the small portion of the land be deeded to the City as Outlot A.
He felt the site plan is more suitable for the site than previously requested.
The buildings will be small offices and stated all mechanical equipment must be
screened. Co. Rd. 4 is expected to bed l/4/8
upgraded
with a median to be constructed.
He also
ff
2.
Retterath asked if Outlot A is deeded as public ownership, if Superamerica would
have to go through any chapels to get connection. The Planner replied no.
Sutliff asked if the mechanical equipment is to be screened according to Ordinance
requirements. The Planner replied yes.
Torjesen stated that if 0utlot A is deeded to the City, he felt that the City
should be able to determine when Superamerica will connect to it. 8earman stated
a possibility would be deed it to the City that no rights be given,so Superamerica
would have to return to the City for connection.
Marhula stated that the City should have control over Outlot A rather than the
proponent. He then asked if there are occupants for the buildings. Johnson
replied that Dr. 8onnett purchased his lot contingent upon rezoning and is not
sure what his time table is. He stated that both office buildings will be con-
structed and Mr. Peterson will be a tenant in one.
approved
Planning Canmission Minutes ,
.4_ January 11, 1982
{ ing lot lighting be no higher than 20' with
The Planner stated that the park
cut-off luminars; it should be added to the staff report.
Marhula stated he had concerns about the dead end parking lot and asked what the
status for the large building was. Johnson stated the floor area ratios are
grossly under-used and stated he felt circulation was worked out well.
Hallett stated that he wanted the City to have control over 0utlot A.
Torjesen stated he felt that this was a significant Guide Plan change. The Planner
stated that he talked with the Metropolitan Council planner regarding that and was
told that this proposal is not at file level that the Metropolitan Council would like
to look at.
Torjesen stated he had reservations about giving up elderly for offices. The Planner
stated that there is a private group trying to get funding for elderly and stated
that there are still 2 sites available for elderly.
Torjesen asked if each building should have the required amount of parking. The
Planner replied yes, but stated that he has made a detailed study of the parking
lot for the veterinary clinic across from Eden Prairie Center and found 4-5 cars
parked at one time.
Torjesen asked if the trees shown on the plan are at 2/3 growth. The Planner replied
( yes.
Torjesen inquired if the duplex property owners are willing to let the proponent
put trees on their property.
Sutliff asked if there is a time limit for the proponent replacing dead trees. The
Planner stated yes; 1 calendar year. If the proponent does not replace it, the City
has a bond which can be cashed to replace the tree.
Kurt Olson, 16618 Terrey Pine Drive, stated he felt that the trees would not s did not
urvive
on top of the hill and stated that his neighbor planted shrubs there and they
survive. The Planner stated that planting of trees will require proper planting and
tender loving care over the 1st year. He stated that from a functional standpoint,
a berm other than trees would be better, but if plant material could be established
it still would be best.,
Terrey
Pine
no. The Planner
Drive
falso rep lied will
noVerflow onto Terrey
Pine Drive. Bearman replied
Walter Dobinson Jr., 16475 Terrey Pine Drive stated he was concerned with the
amount of traffic to be generated, and was
expeopposed
ed. tohthel street
rlocatiepliedon
a ntrips
asked the number of trips/day
per day.
MOTION 1
Hallett moved to close the public hearing on the Mitchell Lake Estates 2nd Addition.
Torjesen seconded, motion carried 7-0.
220
approved
Planning Commission Minutes -5- January 11, 1982
MOTION 2
Torjesen moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the revised COR PUQ
and rezoning from Planned Study to Office as per the plans dated 12/14/81 and the
staff report dated 1/4/82 adding that Outlot A be deeded to the City,-that the
parking lot lighting be no higher than 20' with cut-off luminars; and that approval
be subject to site plan and building plan review by the Planning Commission if
there are major changes to the plan. Sutliff seconded.
DISCUSSION �,"_
Orman asked that Outlot A be deed(,d to the City as public ownership with review
by the Planning Commission when and if Superamerica wants to be connected to the
cul-de-sac and road. Torjesen and Sutliff agreed.
Gartner asked if Superamerica was sold and the new owner wanted the site to be
an office, if they would have to come before the Planning Commission. The Planner
replied yes that they would need rezoning.
Motion carried 7-0.
MOTION 3 _
Torjesen moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the revised COR PUD
and preliminary plat as per the plans dated 12/14/81 and the staff report dated
l 1/4/82 with the same additions as in motion 2. Retterath seconded, motion
carried 7-0.
i .
22
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Jean Johnson, Assistant Planner
THROUGH: Chris Engel,, Director of Planning
DATE: January 4, 1982
PROJECT: MITCHELL LAKE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION(prev. COR)
LOCATION: SW corner of TH 5/Co. Rd. 4, behind Super-
america Gas Station
APPLICANT: Karl Peterson
FEE OWNER: Mabel Ploran
REQUEST: 1. PUD Concept
2. Rezoning from Plan Study to Office
3. Preliminary plat approval
BACKGROUND
The 1979 PUD for this site included 64 units of elderly housing and a
25,000 sq. ft. office. The Developer's Agreement for this PUD was never
signed. In 1981 a new application for just office rezoning was
submitted and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission. The
office request was withdrawn by the proponent to allow additional time to
resolve access design. Now, this new request is for office rezoning and
a new access plan.
The name for the site has been changed from COR to Mitchell Lake Estates
2nd Addition which is in sequence to the adjoining duplex development which
is final platted as Mitchell Lake Estates.
Thr: present plan changes the PUD designation of the elderly housing on a portion
of the site to Office. Federal approval of an elderly project is no longer
likely because of Federal Budget Cuts. The elderly units from this site
can be transferred to the Gonyea site or another site in the City which will
have a better chance of approval and the proposed 1 and 2 story offices will
have less of a visual impact than a 4 story apartment on the adjacent duplex
development.
ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
Required: Proposed:
Min. lot size 20,000 sq. ft. 20,000-105,000 sq. ft.
Min. width 10Q' min. depth 100' 125'+
f Setbacks 35', 20:50,20' All conform
Max FAR 30 1 story, sot mult. All conform
5 pkg. spaces/1000 GFA Lots 1 and 2 exceed require-
ment by 1 space. Lot 3 is
short 1 space.
2Z(�
Staff Report-Mitchell Lake Estates 2nd page 2
Unless the 1 parking space can be designed into the site plan of Lot 3,
one of the following will have to occur: the building will have to be
reduced in size; a variance requested and approved; or the lot size in-
creased to accommodate placement of needed parking.
This plan, unlike some previous CDR plans, provides all lots with access
to a public street - a short cul-de-sac street off of Torrey Pine Drive.
Outlot A, proposed to be owned in conjunction with Lot 2, should be
platted as part of the plat to insure access in the future for the Super-
america Station.
SITE PLAN
The 3 Cffice lots are surrounded by roads and different land uses so
screening is important. The submitted berm landscape plan concentrates
on the area between the offices and duplexes. In this area a 10' high
berm exists and upon this berm, plantings of 6' high evergreens and
approximately 7' high deciduous trees are proposed. This beri%constructed
a few years ago,was never landscaped as per the signed agreement. Per-
mission from some private duplex lot owners will now be necessary to
install plant material upon their lots.
The area between the offices and TH 5 is not bermed and landscaped accord-
ing to the submitted berm landscape plan, although some plantings are
shown on the site plan. Staff would suggest low berms and plantings be
used at the parking areas to obtain the necessary screening.
The landscaping plan will be thoroughly reviewed by staff prior to building
permit issuance.
(NOTE: all full size evergreens and deciduous trees shown on the cross
section do not exist on the site todate but reflect mature height (20+
years) of the submitted plant material)
Sight line A is from the duplexes on Torrey Pine Drive north over Lot 3
parking and Lot 2 single story office building to Highway 5. The berm
and future 6-7' plant material will screen parking from the backyard and
first story sight lines.
Sight line B is from the duplexes on Torrey Pine Drive north over Lot 1
parking and to the 2 story office on Lot 1. Again, the berm and proposed
plantings will screen backyard and first floor views of the parking areas,
but second floor views will be into and over the two story office.
Sight line C is from the duplexes on Torrey Pine Drive east over parking
and the 2 story office to the Superamerica lot. The parking areas will
be screened by the berm and plantings but 2nd story duplex views will be
at the 2nd story office roof.
In any area where 6' evergreens are depicted in single rows, the staff would
recommend that. 7' high evergreens be mixed with the 6' trees.
zz-'7
r
Staff Report-Mitchell Lake Estates 2nd page 3
BecAuse of views over the rooftops, staff would suggest that rooftop
mechanical equipment be screened by material similar to the office
structures,or ground based and screened.
Drainaqe -
Overland drainage is depicted with ultimate drainage to the TH 5 ditch.
This drainage reflects the present topography of the land. After the
water is picked up at the Co. Rd. 4/Tti 5 intersection, it is carried to
the Gonyea pond located in the northeast quadrant of 4/5. It is yet to
be determined if this will require larger culverts under Co. Rd. 4 or
TH 5.
An alternative would be to grade the site so drainage would be directed
to the southwest, picked up in catch basins and discharged via the
existing storm water system designed for the Mitchell Lake Estates pro-
ject with its outlet to Mitchell Lake. Detailed plans of storm water
flows, improvements, etc., must be submitted to the Engineering Depart-
ment for approval prior to final plat submission. Storm water plans will
also be reviewed by the State Highway Department and Watershed District.
TRANSPORTATION
A consolidated right-in/right-out adjacent to the Superamerica Station as
proposed in previous CDR plans was not accomplished. This new plan
utilizes a right-in/right-out near the property's western boundary (700'+
west of 4/5 intersection) and a public street access to Terrey Pine Drive.
The geometries of the TH5 right-in/right-out will be subject to State
Highway review and permit approval. Todate their preliminary comments on
the design are favorable.
Neither the Vet clinic nor the print office will house maximum emoloyees
normally associated with offices, and clientele will come and go at inter-
vals. The other office, 30,000 sq. ft., will house approximately 100-150
employees. The estimated daily trips for the project would be 4DO-450 trips
per day.
SIDE14ALKS
When the site plan contained elderly rental units, internal sidewalk con-
nections were required. The present plan contains concrete walks adjacent
to the parking areas and up to the buildings.
Within this 4 acre site no additional walks appear necessbry.
CASH PARK FEE
At time of buiTding permit issuance, the lots will be required to pay the
cash park fee. Presently the amount for Office District is $1,400/acre.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff reconnnends approval of the PUD Concept, rezoning to Office
and preliminary plat approval contingent upon the following:
1. The site plan be modified to incorporate the required number of parking
spaces.
Staff Report-Mitchell Lake Estates 2nd page 4
2. Outlot A be final platted as part of the public right-of-way.
3. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the owner submit for
review and approval a detailed landscaping plan incorporating the
recommendations of this report.
4. Prior to installation of plant material on private property, the
owner must receive access approval.
5. Prior to final plat approval,a detailed storm sewer plan must be
approved by City.
6. At time of building permit issuance, all lots will be subject to
cash park fee payment.
7. Roof-top or ground based mechanical equipment be screened.
JJ:ss
l
i
22�'J
,
1
- - ...........
:�:
: esota
..........
Lot 2
Lru
Lot I
on
i wb
\�:Y �lllllityi�l;`;7y;1 � qw !=wt13,�.:,�
/� ��• .�••�-----�:--rt ems----`_ --- .-��. _ � -�
f� Mitchell I Lake (Estates
". i.
Terrey Pne Drive
B A �.
SITE PLAN
MITCHELL LAKE ESTATES SEC
CCCN VnAIRiE. MINN[SOIA SSyAA
Owner-Developer: KARL PETERSON
j
�3U -
-
Riley- Purgatory Creek Watershed District
8950 COUNTY ROAD N4
`. • EDEN PRAIRIE.MINNESOTA 55344
January 15, 1982
Mr. Chris Enger
City Planner
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Re: Mitchell Lake Estates 2nd Addition: Eden Prairie
Dear Mr. Enger:
The engineering advisors to the Board of Managers of the Riley-Purgatory
Creek Watershed District has reviewed the preliminary plans as submitted to the
District for the Mitchell Lake Estates 2nd Addition in Eden Prairie. The
following policies and criteria of the Watershed District are applicable for
this project:
1. In accordance with Section E(2) of the District's revised
Rules and Regulations, a grading and land alteration permit
will be required from the District for this project.
Accompanying this permit application, a detailed grading
plan showing both existing and proposed contours must be
submitted to the District for review and approval.
2. A detailed erosion control plan outlining how sediment is
to be controlled, both during and after construction, must
be submitted to the District for review and approval.
3. A detailed stormwater management plan for the handling of
stormwater runoff from the site must be submitted to the
District for review and approval.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this development at an early
date. If you have any questions regarding the District's comments, please call
us at 920-0655.
Sincere y,
C �
ber C. Obermeyer
ARR ENGINEERING CO
Engineers for the District
RCO/gs
c: Mr. Fred Richards
Mr. Fritz Rahr
Mr. Wayne Sanders
7�
��NNES(�q
PRO
MinnesotaD('partr)lclat of T)ia)lshortation
Dis)r)ct 5
2055 No. Lilac Drive
OF•I Golden Valley, l\linncsota 554.22.
(612)545.3761
January 15, 1982
Mr. Chris Enger
Director of Planning
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
In reply refer to: 315
S.P. 2701 T.H. 5
Plat review of Mitchell. Lake Estates 2nd Addition
located in the S.W. quadrant of TH 5 and CSAH 4
in Block 2, Lot 12 Mitchell Lake Estates
in the city of Eden Prairie, Hennepin County
Dear Mr. Eager:
We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. This plat
has been reviewed several times and the only item in question is the access
to Tli 5. According to the plat submitted by the city, the developer is
proposing to construct a right turn on and a right turn off access near the
west property line. Our concern is that no left turns be allowed and the
entrance is channelized so that traffic cannot cross TH 5 to use the shopping
center entrance directly across the highway. Attached is a plan for the
entrance. We will require this design for the entrance when a permit is
issued at our District Office in Colden Valley.
If you have any questions in regard to this review, please contact our
District Layout, Research and Development Engineer, Mr. J. S. Katz at
545-3761 extension 150. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincer ly,
W. M. Crawford, P.E. ;
District Engineer
cc: Charles Weaver
Metropolitan Council
Mike Reiter
Hennepin County Surveyors Office
An Equal Opportunity Employer
U
1.�1
T,H.5
1140 -
\
R,.
oo
14 414
I I
I ,
December 18, 1981
Eden Prairie City Council
Eden Prairie Planning Commission
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Attached are drawings and exhibits for the Preliminary Plat and Rezoning request
for the proposed Mitchell Lakes Second Addition. Additional information you may need
in your deliberation is as follows:
Developer - Mr. Karl Peterson Dr. Walter A. Bonnett
10500 Lake Fall Drive 5705 Newport Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Edina, MN 55436
Location - This 4.21 acre parcel fronts on State Trunk Highway 5 and lies in the
southwest quadrant of the Highway 5 - County Road 4 intersection. The land to the
south and west is being developed as double bungalows. The balance of the land around
the intersection is developed or proposed as concnerciai, office or industrial.
Existinq Site�Anna_l semis - The site has already been rough graded and drains north to
Highway 5. berm,erm, approximately 10' high,has been constructed along the south and
west property line to act as a buffer to the adjacent double bungalow lots. There
is no significant vegetation on the site. Water and sanitary sewer are adjacent to
the site.
Ex�ist_innqZ_oning and Background - The property is currently zoned Planned Study. The
original inal 19 acre PUD—-in 19 8 called for a 48 unit apartment building. This land use
was reflected in the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The previous owners amended the PUD
In 1979 to a 25,000 square foot office building and a 64 unit apartment for the
elderly. The owner could not market the elderly housing project and sold the property
to Mr. Peterson. Mr. Peterson prepared and submitted to Eden Prairie a plan of office
use for the entire parcel. This plan incorporated a public road along the east
property line. Lengthy, time consuming negotiations with the Superamerica gas station
regarding right-of-way and street improvement cost sharing and Highway 5 access
could not be satisfactori.ay resolved and the project was withdrawn.
Proposed Use - The preliminary plat subdivides the parcel into 3 lots. The proposed
site plan meets the dimensional set back and square footage requirements of Ordinance
135 and no variance requests are anticipated.
Lot 1 shows 30,000 square feet of office use in a 2 story building. The owner is
proposing this office be built under a condominium concept. This will accommo-
date the many necessary smaller businessmen who serve and service the surrounding
commercial manufacturing and larger office uses and give them the advantages of
ownership. In contrast to the prior 4 story elderly housing project adjacent
to the residential uses, the building mass is only 2 stories and located next
- 1 -
Z�y
i
J
to Highway 5. The cross sections show it to be effectively screened from
the residential uses by the berm and landscaping.
Lot 2 shows 6000 square feet of one story office space to be used by the owner
for—Tiis own printing and office supplies businesses. Mr. Peterson's business
is currently housed in the basement of the Eden Prairie Lawn & Garden Center.
He has outgrown this space and wants to build in the same area he now services.
Lot 3 shows a 3000 square foot Veterinary Clinic to be owned by Dr. W. A. Bonnett.
Dr. Bonnett owns and oeprates another clinic on Highway 169, just west of the
Eden Prairie Center. The operation will be the same with no outside animal
kenneling.
Access - Access to the site is at the northwest and southeast corners of the parcel.
TF northwest access is a right in - right out access to Highway 5 with no left
turning movements allowed. The Layout Research and Development Engineering Depart-
ment of the Minnesota Department of Transportation prefers the entrance near the
west property line rather than the east tine. They also prefer a geometric design
similar to the access across Highway 5 for the shopping mail. The southeast access
is to a dedicated public street that connects to Terrey Pine Drive. Outlot A will
be owned by Lot 2 and is intended to serve 3 functions. If the Superamerica gas
station land use is changed or if the Highway Department allocates funds to purchase
the driveway rights to Highway 5 (unlikely for some time) there may be a request in
the future for access to Terrey Pine Drive from the Superamerica site. Outlot A will
allow for the proper setbacks to be maintained, will give the City control of traffic
volumes to Terrey Pine Drive and will allow for an equitable sharing of road develop-
ment costs if the road use is shared.
LLaan_ds�ca2inng - A landscaping plan for the berm is attached. The plant material is pri-
marily 6 foot tall pine and spruce so that immediate, year round screening is
achieved. Parking lot lighting is proposed to be no higher than 20 feet, down
directed, with cut-off lumenaires. Roof top mechanical equipment will be architec-
turally screened from residential sight lines.
Traffic - Based on information published by the Institute of Traffic Engineers we
expect the total number of trips in and out on an average workday to be approximately
390. This is not significantly different from the estimated 364 ADT as approved for
the prior office/elderly concept.
Schedule - Mr. Peterson is under severe space and tease expiration constraints at his
present 'location and wants to be under construction on Lot 2 as soon as possible.
Construction on Lot 1 is anticipated for later in 19B2. Dr. Bonnett is recovering
from a heart attack and will not be able to define a schedule until spring or
summer.
We ask your prompt and favorable consideration. If you have any questions,
please contact me.
Respectfully submitted,
Lee W. Joh)� o
Office - 553-1911
Home - 941-1059
i
l�
•'� --�- it I--�. y��. = I i�'�- ,. :,�-..-..- ... ..;
I4M� \ f dCve opmeM 5wmm'ry1
�—� e
1i11
�I. ,•. '.. ,j J'Sde23G1 —
J1 buildwaa�? Qbosl.t 211 a_. '��oo..s} ts—
,,P•,,, {�riu>s.�h spare 3Z _ — ��^
~, site plan
site section elevation
peEvio cc S , : '
z 3(� PE AN
Mitchell Lake Estate:
Second Addition
® CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
i� HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 82-25
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MITCHELL LAKE ESTATES
SECOND ADDITION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND
AMENDING THE GUIDE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of Ordinance 135
provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located
within the City, and
WHEREAS, the Mitchell Lake Estates Second Addition PUD is considered
a proper amendment to the 1979 Comprehensive Guide Plan, and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing
on January 11, I982 and reviewed Karl Peterson's request for approval for
Mitchell Lake Estates Second Addition and recommended approval of the PUD
Concept to the City Council, and
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on February 2,
1982.
NOW THEREFDRE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota as follows:
1. The Mitchell Lake Estates Second PUD, being in Hennepin
County, Minnesota, and legally described as Block 2, i
Lot 12, Mitchell Lake Estates.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD approval as outlined
in the application material dated December 14, 1981.
3. That the PUD meet the reconnendations of the Planning
Commission dated January 11, 1982.
ADOPTED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie this day of
1982.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
SEAL
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENN.EPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 82-26
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF MITCHELL LAKE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Mitchell Lake Estates 2nd Addition ,
dated 12/14/81 a copy of which is on file at the City Hall
and amended as follows:
1 '
is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie
Zoning and Platting ordinances and amendments thereto and is herein
approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of ,
19
Wolfgang H. Penze , Mayor
John D. Frane, City Clerk
SEAL
5
4
} _
February 2„ 1982
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA .
RESOLUTION NO. R82-32
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS
52-010
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 5th day
of January, 1982, fixed the 2nd day of February, 1982, as the date for
a public hearing on the following proposed improvements:
52-010 , Utility and street improvements
on Technology Drive and Mitchell 'Road
WHEREAS, all property owners whose property is liable to be
assessed for the making of this improvement were given ten days published
notice of the Council hearing through two weekly publications of the
required notice and the hearing was held and property owners heard on the
5th day of February, 1982.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE .CITY
OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
1. Such improvement as above indicated is hereby ordered. -
2. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for
this project and is hereby directed to oreoare plans and
specifications for the making of such improvement, with
the assistance of Bennett, Ringrose, Wolsfeld, Inc., Con
sulting Engineers.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on February 5, 1982
r
a }
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor i
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
I
i
r
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Community Services
FROM: Stuart A. Fox, City Forester
DATE: January 26, 1982
SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Removal of Diseased Trees on Private
Property
In an effort to get property owners to remove diseased trees the staff
has made several attempts to work with the affected property owners.
To date the procedures have been as follows:
1. Original notification - summer of 1981 (giving owner 20
days to have trees removed).
2. Second notification - November 1981.
3. Date set for Public Hearing - December 29, 1981 Council Meeting.
4. Public notification of property owners - publication in Eden
Prairie News January 21, 1982.
S. Third letter to property owners January 19, 1982, informing
them of February 2, 1982 Public Hearing.
6. February 2, 1982 Council meeting - Public Hearing with
estimated costs. Property owners have opportunity to appeal.
Many property owners have responded to this effort by the staff to have
diseased trees removed, however many property owners have not. Attached
is a list of property owners who have not removed diseased trees as
required by City Ordinance No. 77-36.
The staff recommends the Council require abatement of the trees on this
list by Resolution No. 82-28.
•CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 82-28
RESOLUTION ORDERING A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FOR THE REMOVAL OF DISEASED ELM TREES
WHEREAS, the City Council fixed the 2nd day of February I982 for a
Public Hearing on the proposed improvement to remove diseased elm trees
from private lands and,
WHEREAS, all property owners whose property is liable to be assessed for
the making of this improvement have been notified and notice has been published
by law;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that
1. Suck improvement is hereby ordered.
2. The City Forester is authorized to advertise for bids
for the removal of said trees. (See attached list of
properties)
ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 2nd day
of February 1982.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL
19
2-qU
N
N LLI
00
N U
N
V
H
OC O O O O O O O O O O O
H o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O
y to o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o
W U 00 fV In v fT 00 00
v fAvi
M H M
..1
-y H ••1 ti H H r-1 ••1 rl
m W W 00 .•1 r-1 co 00 d0 d0 d0 d0 d0 d0
a s %0 .\A 0 et O O O 1n 1n
(� H h r-1 r-1 'i N rf .-1 .-1 N ry
\ \ \ \ \ \ \
� h n h .D fq
N
W N .1 a d0 1n 10 ^'1 N N
aWa v
F�
a
N
)W 4) 4.1 N
et 'd Ol O N O M fV v 1n H u1 .Ni H •Ni.-f 'y1
H M et
M 40 NO O O O O jo-�4
d4d)fA'pN F N F M.-1 F M.-1 {+MN 0 ctN CNN WN NV to�+�'Hv NUvUv NUv MUN 41 Y N 4+T1 N 4) N N 4J ry 4)r.N 1� N /J.•-�N1rfN O N o K 1 O Q) 1 I O N O r N O N O O 79O V 3...1 %O �D -I. 1 -] G 1 JI .] K 1C,y.- F N .-1 'O •.r 1O1OlN-0 .-�.A H ..1 ME O 1N >N 1 .-1 O fA.-1 F N v.-1.••1 1 (d 1H (d '-1 00>v ca N00 C. .•1 (4 M00 V M00MfaUMC)UMaOUM W U
O O
N M
O fA �+
� .ti
.Oi � 'a fd
to ¢ 14 Im V Ad
> u)
N y U O 90
a � �
O 4+K
41
O O O O N M Q•Hb
00 co ra-1 h Ol h fn W
V U K
N
O N O
U < U
W tn
F A Ad
44J 4) O U O - -
I U F U
W a�0 BB co fed
M td� y�y ti ,OG to jo
H h
t-
w
0
® v
0 0
co F o 0 0 0 0 0 00 o Im Im c
\ a•I 'y Ili N V) U1
N W(J O Ill Im t0+• 000 O
N O V 6% N r-I Ln .-1 N IO
Im fA M AOO V/ Vl
co co co co co 00 00
It a s N N V N N I�/1 N n .\-1 o
y q N N N \ \ N "i .••1 N
o IO o n 0000 co 0000 \ \ \
M
00
co ta co
p W O Ili ••I M N N Ln N
fi. aW �O N N tom• ."4 '•1 "i
l"
a
N -
W (71
Of
CDN t+• U1 N O N O O O "S N Im
"4 N
M O
�.y p �-1
C C pO N f+ M
O .1L O CD
0 0I O 0I O 0I 1 1 1 44 V O
1 1 1 1 0I 1 0I N M O O
M M.-1 d' V O N R .'I V
® p V Ol le V N g V.•I CJ V'rI CJ 1 1 x 1 ♦J M I rl N N ,
1 I I 1 1 N N
�•y N r•+ N 41 N 41_.1 N ♦.I-N 1.1_•1 N N N 00 N N 4.1 N N
d N O N N O 0d N c m N O 0d I 1 1 H �.' I N a N
(j 1 1 10 I
�►•LI .-1�-1 r-1 r-1'C7 N N•O�N V�N V '•1 r-1 '•1 a 41 ~ w•1 fA �"I
e•1 f+�-1 1••1 f+
I N Id 1 _•1 O 1 M Id 1 r1 Id 1 rl Id N N N N V '+ I w7 I
M 00 u M M L M C1 CJ M M CJ M CoCJ .•I
O
r-1 '•1 OC(/) N C1 V K IO
Lr
.0 N
V
O N O N
V U)
ld N V O
d oc h G >N Eo• c
.>.LLIm a '" rn
oc °° G
.-1 X•H co •q
p O �. m•rN•1 x v O •IN•1
6q N..... adio 41 .+.. 41 doCD 41 r-
N
Q n..+ vOi n 4;
IPW V.e. 00 N to-4 J IO
N N N
Q u "4 a G
a z ..0 a
Ndp xx g 0 U i" Q.I"I yyH N
CJ:_
2uz.
i
W
0
S
p O
0
o p o 0 0
\ HtA o 0 00 o p p o 0 0 0 0 0 0
N V1 O O O .O 4 O O O O O O
N O O O
N W V h H N .•� N N N N �'•t Ot M M M
iA VD 40 Vf N N
O
HQ .•1 rl 00 rl '•1 rl rl rl rl rl N .•I '•1
Ix w W co 00 \ 00 0o 00 0o 00 00 00 00 00 co
x \ \ a \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
_ a s ao M N N v a a a a v a v v
•., A N N N N N N N
U
H
..1
M
N
4 Iwll Go N M M M M r1 �•i V'
M
W
PC M V 'C 01 N eq .-1 M N d' N
N M F O d' .•/ .-I .y .-t M M M
O O O O N O O O O O O O O O
ly O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O �O 1 O I N 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 N I V ••/ N N N N N N N N N
z .••t M N.-I a N a a X a X a a a V X
O N 1 M I rl•.1 1 "1 I N 1 d' I M F 1 to F I h 1
N /d N N N N tC
N b4 41 N N 41 N 44 N W Cl N 41 0.N N A.N W 0. N 41 N 41
I O U 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I O 1 0 1 0 1 0 I
W I .O".. .O"' .D •-] ;.O..] o.p•-] ;1D.•7 ; �D
O O .•/ O .O .-t 1-•1 .w .-I 'p•-1 O- O .-1 " r-1 r•y O
a .•1 e•/r1 N •••1 e•/M rl N 1-i N"..-1 N'i7 r1 N'i7 e•/N'C .-1 N •-1 v •-1 d' H V''C
•y 1 41?( r•i 1 1 1 R'i 11 Itl 1 Itl 1 1 1 t IC
�D N O `O N .0o N m7, Nc0 N[p m N Co N61
IC h
M
ai a .-t ro vi
� In •.1 a
M t0
to
G >N ~ '~'1•e0i
W y. m O
q O K .Oi
C67 N l{1 41
N _d CO
O < of O m
Ln O O 0 O to
IT MV a'0 M d' O
h W Ol rl CO
41
(d k K
N �•+
•.1 a E e0
n u a r+
a u v
W QI F .r $4 N
a00 .tNO K .14 -
j F� co O
W
a 41 IC IJ6
poi w lu i
" a 8 �u3
N
W
c:
O
u
\
co
O O
N F tFn O O 00 O 00 tn (A O N O O; O
U N fIJ •D O W
u W O t, 10
rA
p1 M e•1 N M
M e} �"1 N 01
Ceht M N 4'f M k N
WW 00 00 d0 r1 00 00 N tl0 e1 00 00
( J4 \ \ \ \ \ \ ttp \ ttp \ \
Q0 a .+ O1 O 01 \ O fT \ M
ry N \ O N
r•t r•1 r•1 N �••1 N N
+.7 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
Yd d0 � co tl0 tl0 co 10 n n at 10
M
A.
N
aW
F
� V .•i N M V to .•1 N M •-1 H
a
W k
WµO, O•1•t •• 10 -0 to• O O 0'Or1 OO MO NO Go
g M N r , i+ N
p O M N ,I tl 'a N
O O NO
d 1' •U O O 1 1 O O 1
a} NA W 1 O iJ �. 1 1 '•1 M 1 1 '?
z •••t' N N O N'a O •I •"t '+ ••1 N Q Q M rl'•1
d 1 I t •+ U et' N 1 M dt a} M�O 1 •� 1 M N M'+ 1
1••t N N N Q 1 N �J 1 1 N N 1 1 N iJ
�„• N N N iJ N N W i� O N N i+ N Y N N yJ N iJ (4.9
1 I 1 0 3 1 O•••t N N O 1 O 1 N O N O 1
r�•1 r�•1 •�•t •'I I O F rl> 10 .•7 •�•1 e q �O•.7 �•7 .fir N
.-1 r•1 r•1 .•-�M >•••t'-t..) '•1 W r1 .�N rM••1 '•1 '•t tn •••t to N
r•1.+ O 1 O.•t .••1 O I 1 .•t ••1 N. d' 1 1 '•1. Q fn
fn F O 6 Co U !` O1 fn •+fn •+ M fn M fn .r
st
N
M
,.y .•1 a} e} Q r•1 co
.b 10 M In In In O G
td In M M In In Ott O N
O 'O N r01 n td > m
M F •O .+ O W C O C u C U •'1 O 9
td td w C > C 2 C N C •X N N .Z C
N In •A O .A F Q•r+ .t �•.� 4) N r1 O d
N mLn i. F O u
41
aW,Aq6 OC.cC ••-7 •3�Wi KW 'OC7 avl 7 > w td•c Q , ON
J > bow OW 'QYC .14
•U•. W > N N C .4
a O C O O d +
N O
O .•-t C
0.
. W• o N p M W v W roQ N a co
td O v W r0 N In
N N
M t, 1n N .D
eq Go N N M' 01
10 t, M In '
•rKW.d�,10
tn
N
O N
Cd N ~
U N pO F O N W td d
XN .roi ttn CIA 0
d w U U N O •.+ Y l7 •N
•EN1 4) N N O .1Jf 00 tn C C d
td d oOo ~ pN tci: Y ti m rOj goo aCi
N
1
µ1 1
Q 1
1
O 1
u 1
1
1
N 1 O
1 O O
UV) O O O O O O O 00 O O
J V)p p O O O O O 1 O 00 N Q O
Ir W u 00 M 00 t, 10 M 1 M 00
C4 00 10 00 N M Vt 1 V4 V., 1'4 01 1D
e•1 1
T.. Q 00 •.y ••1 �•1 '•1 H 1 ••1 ••1 ••1 ••1
u W W •� 00 00 00 00 00 1 •'1 00 00 00 00
r1 a 00 pp ••1 N 1 \ 00 N trco 1- •••1
•••1 ••1 M " N 1 N •'1 N rl N
1
1
W 1
W 1 N
rl '•1 N 1 •'1 1D N
1.4 n 1•i M ••1 H 1 "1 ••1 ••1 ••1 1-1
it 1
1
1
1
40, A4
1 g
ti .°a i $4 '-
W 41 1 ?
N .•1 H 0 V N •0 1 N M.�•1 O 00 •V O
Ea O
p O N O O •t! 1 10 M 1•I 0 O ) O
O k 01 O O Q I O 0 4) O O M O
1t" 1 f{1 1 1•I O O 1 O O 4) O 1 1
O M 1 to 1 1 �.. 1 N N M
.� M 00 W •'1 1.4 N I a O M M eI r1 N
O 1 M 41 I f•1 a M N N 4) 1 r1'•1 M I M 1 N.•1 1
/-1 N 1 F •C7 1 I 1 H 1 1 I 1 N .1 N
E„• N 1•I 00 a+ O N N N 1.1 O 1 N 41 N C• N N 4+y N
t 1 O•rl I O O N O N op fL 1 N O N N 1 1
V b l a.-4 a 1 41 1 10 k
rl .0 x 10 1D V) 1 10 10 O 10 1.4 0/ 1-1
r 1 N u N 0 a 1-I 1.4 1A 60 1 .•I.-1 .-1.4 1.4 r 11-1•C7 r 1
O N coF 1 .r ~•"1 1 I '-1•'k1 i ~'-1 �i a ~ Ir1'-1 ••1
1-1 Q U O U O1 00 e-1 O OC 1 00 O 10 O 10 N 00 1.4
1
1
1
1 b
1-1 1 O
gO O 1my.� O N N > 1 > > OL
10 OL Q 0 M O •N i F 4 4 '•1 d
tN/1 > OCC 60 41 N e-1 k 1 U N N eHi
W >1 N •t1 > M 1•y O 1 Ol 01 U >1
ad) x •m Q G N N 1 M e-1 '•1 O)
C7 r~•1 •o ?4•.ki 00N 00 1 G 41 4J a
z s° >o+ mo 1~0 ?C 3 2: ti0
In O e0 H 1 L
p 00 10 .•1 k N O 1 co .~-1 V~1 1N0
00 0o 10 0•.4 O k a t 10
O 10 Ln ••1 by 4) 10 1 M O O! M N
.r '•I 01 n W t1.u 10 1 n 10 O 01
1
1
1
1
IA
� 1
M 1
01 1
M 41 V 1
0 N C 1
4! O 41 eF01 1 p0
i Aj 41 u o H oo i a co
a .0 Ia �Ny v 44)i w c
A4 44 t0 t a Aj
N
i+ N a uy U. i Yy1 �Y1
O
x i .•� W
0
2U5
,r
Fy'
w
V
O
O
O O
F o 0 0 0 oc o 0 oc o 0 0 0
�o 0
0
co
W U O O 0 00 00 0% in N 0%
N N N N Vim! N N W N N N N N
N
µµ11 uj co co co co 00 00 00 00 00 00 1.4 .M
\ Ln Ln Vf M
IA �O \
py' B i1C LA N N LnMr .r r•1 �•Y N �O
1\+ 00 00 00 00
co
a
pY .Y N N N M .Y '•1 'N•1
w
y
W
ti h a LA
M N .•� M h N .-I O O
ry N N O M N N N O O O O
w O c O o 0 0 0 0 0 o c
O O O O O O 'n O Vi O O N
O OI O 4 b b rl N
e-1 NV N ONO O
® ZO ~ N�O .•1�••� N M �••�.-1 O�••� n O.-�.-/ O N 1
N.•� N ? i i 3 1 N N
ti 1 1 r
F N ry 1� N N N 1-� N N 1 N -�
0
N N N
N O N O N O N O N O E N O E N O 6 N N
f a COCOp a n � � � N
M .•1 C .•+111 �"�In N rl lA H
a r/ ti N ti .•+ N.•1 f0.i CO.•+ t0
Ln M Ln PO Ln co M[C Ln coCi�A m U N tG u IA GC U M N ••� •'�
M V V
Ln ca
M M O O
N %
d N N d
eOy Ln a
.7 O co M M
ti
�0 .Vi .>r u0 -.r
1 - td
w O - - - - ar a a
p
Nof..,I Q
A o G ai M 'V V
W O W W
N d V G
O C •"�•'i M O
N•r0.1 y W 00 00
.y F,
N
VN
v M M
aVi _ p, _ M
W e _ w
vt a
> i
v v
au
24. ..
i
w
n
0
O O h O O O O
(/� O O O 00 00 O .O .0
00 W U 001 00 M Of - .-1 .-i CA M M
\ V) th {R w w d} w w w w w
N
N H .•+ rl "+ 00 00 00
i1 .� 00 00 00 co co
O O \ \ \ CA M M M O
tn
G � � � \ \ h\- 00 00 h %0 00 h
co
x
u113
N
f0 ..1 'O.1 %0 �-1 N N N N -V N N
a
a
M
O yl �,•
O O
1 H 00 w
a O N M .-1 'O M N O O •7 O•.� 00 •d 00
F O N O 41 O M C O H O O N O . N F
O C N O
w O O N O 0! O O O O�Oo N
ti O N N N C 0j N N N Y: M •Q O •"�.O 1 w
M •Q• O N GI7 M N Nat N 0 41•7 CA'O
'�OI•rl r�1 N h W M N L• 1 h 1 1 N.•+ 1 OA O N 1.1 00 1
O N •d N •C7 N N 1 $N �•]
N H•d 1 N -0'd N N OO•N o O N N N N 0)N w N O!l N
Ln
p Q N 1 O O N N.•7 1 O O 1 1 N O••'1 1 H 1r1 N.•1 M
Q 1 1 C%D r-4 ; � �O �••1`>r�i 1.1 N.O r•i N .O
U .-1 # ��i .-1.ry.•�M N M C.+... .-1.-1•C .-.
O N H O r•9 M N r•i r•i 'O 1 d 1 1 H d 1 •b •r-1 'd ~
.Q y t i-1 !0 1 1 r1•ei�•"1 Y+ N •cf 1 ••1'O O 0 O 1 r+•'1
e•1 f0.•0 "go f0 00 h M=N 0 U •+ .� •7 f0 W.r C Z f0 x 0
O
O 00
Ln
N Ln sl 4)
w 41 4) .�� Ln O
R o d N M
d
41 ~ ~ M •.>I >n •'1 C
m f. + 14 C N N
H O LA N > Ca t•+ w CO
•d z M y O K .d 0 Oco 41 :3
RO' ALL' j h C ,.pl 00 Ix W C C �' 1
41 4J
0 41 a 0' V .0� m k O 1•+ O d O w o4 N d
00 )1 P.h .r 41 3 co 4J
~ 4J W IA 0••C•1 F �
a dO— 00s
w M... .. N o .1 •.01 a o o ., o
.1 O 3 00 LA CA E
N 00 � .-1 M Ol 0 00 r
N
O 0 E h N •Q H O N
tom^- p N K >. r•1 h Of ¢ 00 N go, t-
o r-1
U OA N fL
W
a
> a d
ti
7 O V) 0i
U a 0 i0 w 0 d N 3 d
LLI 0Owwco r 0) 0) 41 #A •C
k t~ C O 4, m N 4J a a a y
yC� tY
w N 'Cf 00. 00.. b
go ID
Q 41
" " E+ V O co .2 3 G v) ti
!. y p
24�
!y-
u
.F c c c c c o
0
N . O C 0
W u N O^ 10 O- O
N a} N M 00 51
\ N N VA i9 M Ol 4R
N
r
..1 ei 00 00 .r 00 00
H �W..X 00 00 \ \ 00 \ \
asN O M \ \ \
W 00 01 w 00 f" f" n
C1 y
0o w
0. .. N rl M if 01 .-1 r-1 N
>R
W
W
' rl of O O O 00 N N
O O O O O
Ol .-1 N
w O O O O O G G O
O C OI .L M d' N I 1 1
N N N d'N M N.-1 �!'
N N 1.1 N N N N N 41 N 4+ N 41
N O. I I I N O N O N O
I 1 r7 111 10 10 10 1 r7 1 .-1 1 .3
O .r H •t .r .�-1 .fir N
I 1 '1 '10 .+
V1 I PO W •N"1 eft
N-i cc 00 W Ln 04
N
d 00Ln
d'
N N d N
C1 to 4+ > O O N
y G M a N
xCJ K 7 1+.Oi
7
,1 '4 -H a 10 ..7 K O O$ 3 n
N .,I rl A N w m .�1 O Y. 7 v0i
W N �" 3 ' 199 p O 3.-OI .�.C
A N C
C4 0. O
[� 0..HI > 41 40A U 4) to .-1•�
Q N N ra i 7 N Do H H -' i
.�..•r-0 C7 C 7
W O ld N 6 01 41 N
O
N N C 00 0 0 N O-0 00 O
d
N f-'V O O.OI r O O N'O
O0y .Ln N Of 00 NC7 aW
YI
�! ca
o a
W o v Iu C >
N ti 7
p� N H N m 3 3
e � c N N
a 8
's1 .00 0 A of N
C. Names and address of architect,engineer,and general contractor:
Architect/Engineer- Wallace and Mundt Architect-Planners
5275 Edina Industrial Boulevard, 55435
Contractor- To be determined
5. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST FOR:
Construction Contracts $ 1,460,000
Equipment Acquisition and Installation* 100,000
Architectural and Engineering 90,000
Legal 30,000
Interest during Construction 490,000
Bond Reserve 335,000
Contingencies 145,000
Other 150,000
Total $ 2,800,000
*The heating and air conditioning equipment is included as building costs and
will be specified at a later date.
6. BOND ISSUE:
a. Amount of proposed bond issue:
$2,800,000
b. Proposed date of sale of bond:
March 23,1982
C. Length of bond issue and proposed maturities:
Maximum 30 years
d. Proposed original purchaser of bonds:
Miller&Schroeder Municipals,Inc.
e. Name and address of suggested trustee:
To be determined
I. Copy of any agreement between Applicant and original purchaser:
i
See attached
26)
g. Describe any interim financing sought or available:
None
h. Describe the nature and amount of any permanent financing in addition
to bond financing:
None
7. BUSINESS PROFILE:
a. Are you located in the City of Eden Prairie?
Yes
b. Number of employees in Eden Prairie:
I. Before this project:
Four(4)
ii. After this project:
Seventy-Five (75)
® C. Approximate annual sales:
Projected Annual Revenues
1983 1984 1985 1986
$80?.,774 $1,359,1t7 $1,475,964 $1,603,Z09
d. Length of time in business:
Incorporated in 1970
Length of time in Eden Prairie:
July,1981
e. Do you have plants in other locations? If so,where?
No
f. Are you engaged in international trade?
No
C
�;J
8. OTHER INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROdECT(S):
a. List the name(s) and location(s) of other industrial development pro-
jects(s) in which the Applicant is the owner or a "substantial user" of
the facilities or a "related person" within the meaning of Section
103(b)(6)of the Internal Revenue Code.
None
b. List all cities in which the Applicant has requested industrial revenue
development financing.
None
C. Detail the status of any request the Applicant has before any other city
for industrial development revenue financing.
None
d. List any city in which the Applicant has been refused industrial
development revenue financing.
None
e. List any city (and the project name) where the applicant has acquired
preliminary approval to proceed but in which final approval authorizing
• the financing has been denied.
None
f. If Applicant has been denied industrial development revenue financing
in any other city as identified in (d) or (e),specify the reason(s) for the
denial and the name(s)of appropriate city officials who have knowledge
of the transaction.
9. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF:
a. Underwriter (If public offering):
Miller&Schroeder Municipals,Inc.
2400 Northwestern Financial Center
7900 Xerxes Avenue South
Minneapolis,Minnesota 55431
b. Private Placement Purchaser (If private placement):
N/A
i. If lender will not commit until City has passed its
preliminary resolution approving the project,submit
a letter from proposed lender that it has an interest
in the offering subject to appropriate City approval
e► and approval of the Commissioner of Securities.
2 5q
C. Bond Counsel:
Dorsey Windhorst,Hannaford,Whitney&Halladay
2200 First Bank Place
Minneapolis,Minnesota 55402
Attention: Michael Reeslund
d. Corporate Counsel:
Johnson&Eastlund
1702 Midwest Plaza Building
Minneapolis,Minnesota 55402
Attention: Daniel Blomquist
e. Accountant:
Mc Gladrey,Henrickson&Co.
1800 Town Square
445 Minnesota Street
St.Paul,Minnesota 55101
Attention: Jerry Stif ter
10. WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR:
a. Construction start:
March 31, 1982
b. Construction completion:
March 31, 1983
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The undersigned Applicant understands that the approval or disapproval by
the City of Eden Prairie for Industrial Development bond financing does not
expressly or impliedly constitute any approval, variance,or waiver of any provision
or requirement relating to any zoning, building, or other rule or ordinance of the
City of Eden Prairie, or any other law applicable to the property included in this
project.
ITY CHRI HOM S
4
Bruce Farrington-,Pres' e
2C��
RESOLUTION NO. -3 tl
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE AUTHORIZA-
TION AND ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS OF
THE CITY UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES,
CHAPTER 474, FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANC-
ING A PROJECT THEREUNDER; AND AUTHORIZ-
ING AN APPLICATION BY THE CITY TO THE
MINNESOTA COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES
AND REAL ESTATE
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the Council)
of the City of Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesota
(the City), as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The Legislature of the State of Minnesota
in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended (the Act),
has found and declared that the welfare of the State
requires active promotion, attraction, encouragement and
development of economically sound industry and commerce
through governmental acts to prevent, so far as possible,
emergence of blighted lands and areas of chronic
unemployment; has authorized municipalities to issue
revenue bonds to finance, in whole or in part, the cost of
the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement
and betterment of projects, including any properties, real
or personal, used or useful in connection with a revenue
producing enterprise, whether or not operated for profit,
engaged in providing health care services, including
nursing homes and related facilities; and has authorized
municipalities to enter into "revenue agreements", as
defined in the Act, with any person, firm, or public or
private corporation or federal or state governmental
y subdivision or agency (the Contracting Party) providing
-3-
for the payment by the Contracting Party of amounts
sufficient to provide for the prompt payment of principal
of and interest on the revenue bonds.
1.02. It has been proposed that the City issue
its revenue bonds, pursuant to the authority granted by
the Act, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
$2,800,000, or such lesser amount as may be necessary, to
finance costs of acquisition, construction and equipping
of a 60-bed nursing home and related facilities and
improvements on certain land located in the City (the
Project) to be owned and operated by Twin City Christian
Homes, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the
Corporation); and to make the proceeds of such sale
available to the Corporation. The Corporation will agree
to pay the City amounts sufficient to pay promptly the
principal of and interest on the revenue bonds, and will
agree to cause the Project to be completed. The Project
is presently estimated to cost approximately $2,800,000.
1.03. The City has been advised that,
conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital cost
of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at
such high costs of borrowing that the scope of the Project
or the economic feasibility of operating the Project would
® be significantly reduced, but that with the aid of
municipal financing, and its resulting low borrowing
costs, the Project can be constructed as designed and its
operation is economically more feasible.
Section 2. Public Hearing.
2.01. As required by Section 474.010 Subdivision
7b, of the Act, this Council, pursuant to a motion passed
on January 5, 1982, called and held a public hearing on
the proposal to undertake and finance the Project. Notice
of the time and place of the hearing, and stating the
general nature of the Project and an estimate of the
principal amount of bonds to be issued to finance the
Project, was published at least once not less than fifteen
(15) days nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the date
fixed for the hearing, in the official newspaper of the
City and a newspaper of general circulation of the City.
A draft copy of the proposed application to the Minnesota
Commissioner of Securities and Real Estate, together with
all attachments and exhibits thereto, was available for
public inspection following the publication of such notice
at the place and times set forth in the notice.
-4-
20
2.02. All parties wno appeared at the public
hearing were given an opportunity to express their views
with respect to the proposal to undertake and finance the
Project. This Council has heard and considered the views
expressed at the public hearing and the information
submitted to the City by the Corporation.
Section 3. Ap round Authorizations.
3.01. On the basis of information given the City
to date, and the views expressed at the public hearing, it
is found and determined that the Project furthers the
purposes stated in Section 474.01 of the Act, and that it
would be in the best interest of the City to issue its
industrial development revenue bonds under the provisions
of the Act to finance costs of the Project in an amount
not to exceed $2,800,000 (the Bonds).
3.02. The Project is hereby given preliminary
approval by the City and the issuance of the Bonds for
such purpose approved. The Bonds shall not be issued
until the Project has been approved by the Commissioner of
Securities and Real Estate, as provided by the Act, and
until the City and the Corporation have agreed upon the
details of the Bonds and provisions for their payment.
3.03. If the Bonds are issued and sold, the City
will enter into a lease, mortgage, direct or installment
sale contract, loan agreement, take or pay or similar
agreement, secured or unsecured, satisfying the
requirements of the Act (the Revenue Agreement) with the
Corporation. The amounts payable by the Corporation to
the City under the Revenue Agreement will be sufficient to
pay the principal, interest and redemption premium, if
any, on the Bonds as and when the same shall become due
and payable.
3.04. The Corporation has agreed to pay directly
or through the City any and all costs incurred by the City
in connection with the Project whether or not the Project
is approved by the Commissioner of Securities and Real
Estate; whether or not the Project is carried to
completion; and whether or not the Bonds or Revenue
Agreement and all other operative instruments are executed.
3.05. The adoption of this resolution does not
constitute a guarantee or a firm commitment that the City
will issue the Bonds as requested by the Corporation. The
City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw
from participation and accordingly not issue the Bonds
-5-
��r
should the City at any time prior to the issuance thereof determine
that it is in the best interest of the City not to issue the Bonds or
should the City, Corporation and any other parties to the transaction
be unable to reach agreement as to the terms and conditions of any of
the documents required for the transaction, or should the City determine,
in its sole discretion, upon receipt of a feasibility report or other
data that it is in the best interest of the City not to issue the bonds.
3.06. In accordance with the Act, the Mayor and
City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to submit
the proposal for the Project to the Minnesota Commissioner
of Securities and Real Estate for her approval of the
Project. The Mayor, City Clerk, City Attorney and other
officers, employees and agents of the City, in conjunction
with Dorsey, Windhorst, Hannaford, Whitney & Halladay,
Bond Counsel to the City, are hereby authorized to provide
the Commissioner with any preliminary information she may
need for this purpose, and the City Attorney is authorized
to initiate and assist in the preparation of such
documents as may be appropriate to the Project.
3.07. The City will cause the Corporation to
comply with all of the provisions of the Act, including
Section 474.01, Subdivision 8, thereof, in the issuance of
the Bonds and the financing of the Project.
3.08. All commitments of the City expressed
herein are subject to the condition that within twelve
months of the date of adoption of this resolution the City
and the Corporation shall have agreed to mutually
acceptable terms and conditions of the Revenue Agreement,
the Bonds and of the other instruments and proceedings
relating to the Bonds and their issuance and sale. If the
events set forth herein do not take place within the time
set forth above, or any extension thereof, and the Bonds
are not sold within such time, this resolution shall
expire and be of no further effect.
Section 4. Special Obligations.
In all events, it is understood, however, that
the Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or
encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the
City except the Project, if it becomes the property of the
City, and from the revenues received from the Project and
property pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not
constitute a debt of the City.
—6—
(. Section 5. Effective Date.
This resolution shall be effective immediately
upon its final adoption.
PASSED AND FINALLY ADOPTED by the City Council of
the City of Eden Prairie, this 2nd day of February, 1982.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
-7-
2(0
Guide Plan
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
• RESOLUTION 82-27
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE EDEN PRAIRIE
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN UPDATE AND
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature enacted the Metropolitan
Land Use Planning Act, which requires Eden Prairie to revise the City's
Comprehensive Guide Plan, and
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has been involved in the Guide
Plan Update process since 1975 and conducted numerous neighborhood and
City meetings, and
WHEREAS, Eden Prairie submitted their Comprehensive Guide Plan
containing its'Housing Assistance Plan in December of,1979, and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council, on February 22, I981, adopted
Res. 81-15 adopting the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide Plan according
to the 'recommendations of the Physical Development Committee, and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission has reviewed the Plan in detail
and held its final meeting, a public hearing, on January 25, 1982. At
such hearing the Planning Commission did recommend approval of the Com-
prehensive Guide Plan and Housing Assistance Plan to the City Council, and
WHEREAS, the City Council did receive the Planning Commission's
recommendations for adoption on February 2, 1982 and did hold a public
hearing on same.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie
Minnesota, that the City Comprehensive Guide Plan Update. dated September,
1980. is hereby adopted.
ADOPTED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie, this day of
1982.
Wolfgang H. Penze , Mayor
ATTEST:
o n D. Frane, City C er
SEAL
Unapproved
Planning Commission Minutes -4- January 25, 1982
• MEMBERS ABSENT: Hakon Torjesen
O. REVIEW OF CITY COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AND HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN.
u is hearing to recommend final aoproval of the Comprhensive Guide
Plan to the City Council. A public hearing.
The Planner stated that the-City'thought they had the option to hold a public-hearing
before either the Planning Commission or the City Council. However, the City Att-
orney said that the public hearing had to be before the City Council. The Guide Plan
had been approved by the City, but the Metropolitan Council made changes and it has
to be approved again_ He stated that the Housing Assistance Plan also needs approval.
The Housing Assistance Plan is for low and moderate income ranges. The allocation
for the number of units for Eden Prairie is currently 1338 units (it was allocated
in 1978) and stated he expects the number to be lowered. The City will have 34 units.
Gartner asked if the existing units are occupied. The Planner replied yes with a
waiting list.
MOTION 1
artner moved to close the public hearing on review of the City Comprehensive Guide
Plan and Housing Assistance Plan. Retterath seconded, motion carried 6-0.
MOTION 2
Gartner moved to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan to the City
Council. Retterath seconded, motion carried 6-0.
MOTION 3
artner moved to recommend approval of the Housing Assistance Plan to the City
Council. Retterath seconded, motion carried 6-0.
2 GZ
February 2, 19B2
STATE.2F MINNESOTA
CITY EDEN PRAIRIE
COUNT OF HENNEPIN
The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows:
S (160.0'
10031 VOID OUT CHECK Ski Trip 252.0
10216 AFTON ALPS Payroll 422.6
10217 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE payroll 1,688.2
10218 GROUP HEALTH PLAN Payroll 524.1-
10219 HMO SERVICES Payroll 2,113.4.
10220 HMO SERVICES- Payroll 715.€:
10221 -BLUE CROSS INSURANCE Payroll 8,574.3
10222 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN Liquor 4,8n8.9.
10223 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. 2,994.9
10224 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHLS. LIQUOR CO. ExpLiqenses uor 38.0..
10225 MY CHEESE SHOP Wine 4,587.i
10226- OLD PEORIA CO., INC. Liquor 6,551.E
10227 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. Wine 370.3:
10228 MIDWEST WINE CO. Wine 208.E
10229 PAUSTIS & SONS Registration Workshop-Public Safety 29•r'-
10230 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 14.r
10231 HENN. TECHNICAL CENTER- SOUTH CAMPUS Registration Fee-Public Safety 28B
10232 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE Special Fuel Tax-December 1981 8,987 r
Sales Tax-December 1981
10233 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE Interest on Land Purchase-Red Rock Rd. 2,029.E
102 VIRGIL & LAURA MAE SEIFERT Freight Charges-Community Center 158.�"
102 NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES Supplies-Cam ne Unit 103.0
1023 RAY ALLEN MFG. CO. Supplies-Canine Unit 71.0
10237 ARROW MOCCASIN CO. Supplies-Canine Unit 143.E
10238 LAS-SANA Supplies-Canine Unit 79.'
10239 ROBBINSDALE FARM SUPPLY, INC. Supplies-Canine Unit 54.f
1pP40 TWIN CITY PET SUPPLY Scale, Stencils-Community Services 56.2
10241 ALOY GRAPHIC SUPPLY, INC. Mileage 40.E
10242 STUART ALEXANDER Popcorn Popper-Community Center 2,650.(
10243 AMERICAN POP CORN CO. 2,453.%
10244 EARL F. ANOERSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Street Signs 2.C'
Catalog-Park Planning 4,078.4
10245 ARTSIGN MATERIALS CO: Equipment-Community Center
10246 AUDIO SKATE Service-Eden Rd.,Mitchell Rd. & W.78th St,
10247 B R W City West Streets & Utilities, Valley
View Rd. & T.H. 169 to I 494, Homeward 27,371.E
Hills Road. qq66
10248 BERGIN AUTO BODY Equipment Repair & Parts 5,412.�
jpP49 BLACK & VEATCH Service-Water Treatment Plant 5,824.,
10249 BLACK & VEATCH Service-Water Treatment Plant 365.
1pP50 CITY OF VEATCHNGTON Service-November & December 1981 95...
Service-Water Dept.
10252 BRADLEY EXTERMINATING CO. Service-Bennett Place, Valley View II, Sunny-
10253 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. brook Rd,Pubiic Safety 5 Maintenance Bld'�401.`
Supplies-Liquor Stores 234.
10254 BUTCH'S BAR SUPPLY Refund-Plumbing Permit 21.
CARLSON AUTO FIRE PROTECTION Supplies-Public Works 308.•
jp2C CENTRAIRE, INC. Fire Hose-Community Center
10257 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY, INC. Vellum, tape-Engineering Dept. & Park Plan. 147.'
10258 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. Refund-Skiing Lesson 14:`
1pp59 CLIFF COLSTON
a63
Page Two
February 2, 1982
1020 CATHY CORDELL Refund-Recreation Dept. 25.Oi
10261 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Payroll 17,979.8'
10262 STATE TREASURER Payroll 16,334.E:
10263 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOIS Payroll 73.5
10264 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK Payroll 25.0
10265 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE Payroll 6,613.2
10266 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSN. Payroll 12,5D5.4
10267 MINNESDTA STATE RETIRMENT SYSTEM Payroll 40.0
10268 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE & ANNUITY CO. Payroll lO1.0
10269 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. Payroll 1,680.0
10270 DALCO Cleaning Supplies 52.0
10271 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment Parts 45.F
10272 EUGENE A. DIETZ Expenses 135.7
10273 DOMTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. Salt 230.7
10274 -DORHOLT PRINTING/STATIONERY INC. Dffice Supplies 630.7
10275 CITY OF EDINA Test-Water Dept. 94•C
10276 EDEN PRAIRIE SANITATION CO. Service-December 1981 90.0
10277 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY, INC. Liners-Street Dept. 20•4
10278 EMPIRE-CROWN AUTO, INC. Equipment Repair & Parts 116.
10279 JOHN ESS & SONS, INC. Service-Round Lake Park 62D.r
102BO EXIDE BATTERY SALES Batteries 206•`
10281 FEED-RITE CONTROLS, INC. Sulfate-Water Dept. 3,032.
10282 FLEX-O-LITE DIVISION Equipment-Park Maintenance 46•
10283 FRANZ ENGINEERING REPRODUCTIONS Service-Engineering Dept. 41.1
10 FRONTIER LUMBER & HARDWARE Lumber-Fire Dept. 942.c
10 , JUNE GILBERT Refund-Recreation Dept. 4•C
10286 W. W. GRAINGER, INC. Drill-Street Maintenance 152.'
10287 AKE GUSTAFSON Services-City Hall 75.:
10288 HARMON GLASS CO. Equipment-Repair 7
10289 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT CO. Post Pounder-Water Dept. 640•`
10290 VIRGINIA HUHN Refund-Recreation Dept. 25.
10291 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Oxygen, Bolts & Nuts-Steet Dept. 143.
10292 FRANK JEDLICKI Refund-Heating Permit 135..
10293 CARL JULLIE Expenses 3•'
10294 K & K SALES, INC. Door Closers-Round Lake Park 142.E
10295 KARULF HARDWARE, INC. Tin snips,paint pans, rollers,locks, anchors,
tape, valve, bulbs-Fire Dept. 136.
10296 KNOX LUMBER Lumber-Engineering Dept. 169.
10297 LOGIS Service-December 1981 2,238.
10298 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM. SAC-December 1981 24,824.
10299 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM. Service 50,574."
10300 MORRY MIKKELSON Lettering of Rule Signs-Community Center 745.
10301 MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT Pen Tips-Engineering Dept. 32•
10302 MINNESOTA GAS CO. Service 5,889.
10303 MINNESOTA PLAYGROUND, INC. Protective Netting-Community Center 680.'
10304 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSN, INC. Dues 80..
10305 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP Service 19.,'
10306 EARL MORE Expenses at Senior Center 49.
10307 O'CONNOR & HANNAN Legal Services 3,581.
10,308 THE PATCO CO. Warning Lights-Water Dept. 350.:
1 3 KATHY PERRY Supplies-Recreation Dept. 25.
10310 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC CO., INC. Service-Forest Hills Skating Rink 652.:
10311 JIM PUFAHL Broomball Official 220.
10312 R & R SPECIALTIES, INC. Ice Edger, Blades- Community Center 1,223.
10313 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CO. Equipment Rental-Forestry Dept. 2,500.
10314 REGISTER MEDIA INC. Ads-Liquor Stores 124.
Page Three
February 2, 1982
10315 CHRIS REID Refund-Recreation Dept. 24.C.
103'f RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOCIATES, INC. Service-Westwood Ind. Park, Autumn Woods,
Sundquist Add., Willow Creek 6,698.2
10317 ROBERTS DRUG Supplies-Police Dept. 3.F,
10318 ROCHESTER CHEMICAL & MAT CO. Matting-Round Lake.Park 1,733.7
10319 RODNEY W. RUE Mileage 101.E
10320 KATHY SCHUMACHER Test-Public Safety Dept. 50.(
10321 SCHOELL & MADSDN, INC. Service-Chatham Woods 725.1
10322 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING INC. Ads-Liquor Stores 153.1
10323 SON OF A PRINTER Printing-Police Dept. 70.1
-10324 DON STREICHER GUNS, INC. Breathelyzer test kits-Public Safety 170.c
10325 SULLIVANS SERVICES, INC. Service 100.(
10326 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC. Supplies- Engineering Dept. 32.!
10327 CARRIE TIETZ Service 45.(
10328 TRANSCON LINES Freight Charges-Community Center 54.E
10329 LINDA J TRONDSON Legal Service 610.(
10330 TWIN CITY TESTING & ENGINEERING LAB, INC. Tests-Water Dept. 354.7
10331 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Uniforms-Police Dept. 64.E
10332 VAN WATERS & ROGERS Chlorine-Water Dept. 238.c
10333 VICOM Telephone System-Community Center 3,250.(
10334 VICTORY ENVELOPE INC. Envelopes-Water Accounting 238.: '
10335 WATERITE, INC. Pool Controller-Community Center 4,686.'
10336 HEATHER WURTZ Refund-Recreation Dept. 4.
10337 XEROX CORPORATION Service 1,184.: :
10338 STAR AND TRIBUNE NEWSPAPERS Subscribtion-City Hall 14.t
10339 OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. Liquor 989.(
10 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. Liquor 723.2
10 JOHNSON BROS. WHLS. LIQUOR CO. Liquor 1,662.7
10342 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. Wine 576. '
10343 MIDWEST WINE CO. Wine 294.'
10344 HAPPY TYME DISTRIBUTORS Mixes 134.'
10345 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING, INC. Wine 657.0
10346 PAUSTIS & SONS Wine 195.:
10347 MINNESOTA DISTILLERS, INC. Liquor 2,638.7
10348 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. Liquor 2,212.:
10349 KAY BERGMAN Refund-Recreation Dept. 17.0
10350 CHEMSCAPE Service 90.(
10351 FLAHERTY EQUIPMENT CORPORATION Equipment Repair & Parts 26.,
10352 GATEWAY SAFETY PRODUCTS CORPORATION Flares-Fire Dept. 1,197.2'
10353 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Equipment Repair & Parts 322.E
10354 JACK HACKING Expenses 18.(
10355 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSN. Dues-Public Safety 40.(
10356 HUB OFFICE PRODUCTS CO. Sheet Protectors-Public Safety 45.E
10357 ITASCA EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment Parts 18.0
10358 CARL JULLIE Expenses 10.f
10359 BOB LAMBERT Expenses 150.('
10360 LANG, PAULY & GREGERSON, LTD. Expenses 8,113.i
10361 ROBERT N MARTZ Expenses 156.
10362 MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY Service 377.,
10363 MUNICI-PALS Oues-1982 5.(
10364 NORTHERN SATES POWER CO. Service 10,410.
10 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO. Service 572.1
10 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MINNESOTA, INC. Equipment Repairs-Liquor Store, PV Mall 49.(
10367 PRAIRIE LAWN AND GARDEN Equipment Repair & Parts 44.E
10368 RAINBOW SIGNS INC. Cards- Police Dept. 4.c.
10369 RAPID,COPY, INC. Equipment-Police Odpt. 627.1
a 6�''
'age Four
=ebruary 2, 1982
10310AN11ARILYN REIOER Refund-Recreation Dept. 10.00
10371WMERTS LITHO, INC. Printing Fall Brochure 1,125.20
10372 SON OF A PRINTER Printing-Police Dept. 20.35
10373 STAR AND TRIBUNE NEWSPAPERS Employment Ad-Police Dept. 97.00
10374 THE WALL STREET JOURNAL Subscription-Finance Dept. 89.00
10375 SANDRA F. WERTS Mileage 34..05
10376 WILSON LEARNING MIDWEST Conference 85.OG
10377 MAGNEY CONSTRUCTION CO. Service-Community Center 92,837.0-
10378 MINN. CHAPTER ITNL. ASSESSING OFFICERS Dues-Assessing Dept. 50.0+_
TOTAL 40 ,086.E
January 25, 1982
TO: Chief Hackin
THROUGH: Captain Keith Wall
FROM: Sgt. Les Bridger
SUBJFCT: Liquor License Application
We have completed the record checks and background investigation of all the
principals listed on the application submitted by Abby's Restaurant Enterprises,
Incorporated, intending to do business as Abby's Restaurant.
There is no apparent reason for our Police Division to recommend denial of a
liquor license for this establishment. Listed below are the agencies contacted
to obtain background and character reference data.
Aberdeen Police Department
Alcohol_, Tobacco and Special Taxes
Bloomington Police Department
Brooklyn Center Police Department
Brown County Sheriff's Department (South Dakota)
Bureau of Alcohol, Tabacco and Firearms
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension - Contraband
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension - OCIU
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension - Records
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension - South Dakota
Carver County Sheriff's Department
Chicago Police Department
Cook County Sheriff's Department (Illinois)
Columbia Heights Police Department
Crystal Police Department
Dakota County Sheriff
Drug Enforcement Administration
Department of Corrections
Edina Police
Eden Prairie Department of Public Safety
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Golden Valley Police Department
Hennepin County Sheriff
Internal Revenue Service
Minneapolis Police Department
Minnetonka Police Department
Minnesota Attorney General
Minnesota Liquor Control
Ramsey County Sheriff
Roseville Police Department
I
• Chief Hacking
January 25, 1982
Page 2
Richfield Police Department
Robbinsdale Police Department
Scott County Sheriff
St. Anthony Police Department
St. Louis Park Police Department
St. Paul Police Department
State of Illinois Crime Bureau
United States Postal Service
United States Secret Service
Washington County Sheriff
AFFIDAVITS OF GOOD CHARACTER
1. No. Eileen Schema, 7300 York Avenue South, Edina
2. Mr. Raymond Duffy, 420 West 56th Street, Minneapolis
3. Mr. Jeffrey Levy, 1235 Yale Place, 0708, Minneapolis =
264
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John D. Frane
DATE: January 26, 1982
RE: Final approval MIDB's for Parker-Hannifin Corporation
$2,000,000 Resolution 82-29
Preliminary approval of this project was given by the Council
on July 17, 1979 for a 55,000 square foot office facility which
is now built and located in Shady Oak Industrial Park 4th. The
original request to the Council was for a private placement; the
company is requesting authorization for a public offering of
i bonds. Their earnings before taxes are:
1977 $ 69,0389000
1978 779252,000 i..
1979 98,0629000 --
1980 92,430,000
1981 108,342,000
Attached is their original application and information about
the company from the offering circular. The resolution will
be in the Mayor's signature file Tuesday evening
i
i -
i .
269
i
• . _ CITY OF IiDEN PiIAIRIE, MINNESOTA
Application for
Industrial Development Bond Project Financing
1. APPLIurr:
a. Business Name -
PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION
b. Dusiness Address -
17325 Euclid Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44112
peration, partnership, sole proprietor
C. Business Form (cor
-
ship, eta.) -
Corporation
ri. Sxate of Incorporation or organization -
Ohio
. @uthorized Representative
a -
Wally Young, Treasurer, Cleveland
Jim Beiswanger, Minneapolis
General Manager, Plews Division
f. Phone -
(216) 531-3000 Cleveland
(612) 920-9070 Minneapolis
2. NAtIE W ANJ) AI)DRrSSES 01" MAJOlt STOCIi1101,UBi;S Oil rRINC11)ALS:
1 Publically Held, New York Stock Exchange
b.
r C.
l
-1-
2'70
3. GIVE BniFF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF BUSINESS, PRINCIPAL
PRODUCTS, ETC: parker Hannifin is a manufacturer of fluid power products.
t The Plews Division manufactures oilers, grease guns, oil spouts, blow guns,
pneumatic couplers, tire gauges and other mechanic's service tools and supplies.
4. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Estimate 8,000 sq. ft. of office for general management, sales management,
accounting, and data processing. Estimate 47,000 sq. ft. for light assembly,
packaging, and finished goods, and shipping.
a. Lucationand intended use:
Shady Oak Industrial Park. Use will be general office, assembly,
packaging, warehousing and shipping. (LaragA.o6.r 1 SN�o nAR
,=.v0us r Riw #rk )
b. Present ownership of Project site:
Richard W. Anderson
C. Names and address of architect, engineer, and general.
contractor:
John Thompson
Vice President, Industrial Engineering
17325 Euclid Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44112
S. ES'PIMATED PROJECT COST FOR:
Land $----11-5y 000 _
BuiI di.nl; +, 1 1300,000 Jr
Eq,uipmcnt $` 215,000 _
Other Specials $� 170,000
Total $_�2,000,000
_g_
27)
G. DOND ISSUE -
a. Amount of proposed bond issue -
$2,000,000.00
b. Proposed date of sale of bond -
Tentative October 1, 1979.
c. Length of bond issue and proposed maturities -
Tentative 25 years.
d. Proposed original purchaser of bonds -
Private placement, lender not determined. -
e. Name and address of suggested trustee -
Unknown at present time.
f. Copy of any agreement between Applicant and original
purchaser -
Lender not determined. - -
g. Describe any interim financing sought or available -
None
h. Describe nature and amount of any permanent financing
in addition to bond financing -
None
7. BUSINESS PROFILE: -
a. Are you located in the City of Eden Prairie?
No
b. Number of employees in Eden Prairie?
None
i. Before this project:
None
-3-
27z
w-
ii. After this project?
65 employees, estimated payroll $1,000,000.00.
c. Approximate annual sales -
Parker Hannifin Corporation sales exceed $800,000,000.00 annually.
d. Length of time in business 1938
in Eden Prairie 0 —
e. Do you have plants in other locations? If so, where?
Yes.
Parker Hannifin Corporation has 53 plants in 22 states.
f. Are you engaged in international trade?
Yes
8. OTIU''R INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPW NT PROJECT(S):
a. List the namc(s) and location(s) of other industrial
development projects) in which the Applicant is the
owner or a "substantial user" of the facilities or a
"releated person" within the meaning of Section 1O3(b)(6)
of the Internal Revenue Code.
None in the state of Minnesota. Others include:
Jacksonville, Alabama
Manhattan, Kansas
Ogden, Utah
Lorain, Ohio
_A-
27 3 '
b. J,ist all cities in which the Applicant has requested
industrial revenue development financing.
Jacksonville, Alabama
Manhattan, Kansas
Ogden, Utah
Lorain, Ohio
of any request the Applicant has before
C. Detail the status
industrial development revenue financing.
any ether city for
None
d. List any city in which the Applicant has been refused
industrial development revenue financing.
i
None
C. List any city (and the project name) where the: Applicant
has ncquircd preliminary approval to proceed but in which.
final approval authorizing the financing has been denied.
i
1
None
2ly
i
i. If-Applicant has been. denied industrial development
revenue financing in any other city as identified
in (d) or (e), specify the reason(s) for the denial
and the name(s) of appropriate city officials who
have knowledge of the transaction.
9. NAMES AND ADDRESS OF:
a. Underwriter (If public offering)
Not known at present time
b. Private Placement Purchaser (If private placement)
Unknown at present time
i. If lender will not commit until City has
passed its preliminary resolution approving
the project, submit a letter from proposed
lender that it has an interest in the
offeritir subject to appropriate City
approval and approval of the Commissioner
of Securities.
Proposed private placement, lender is not known.
-6-
275�
c
b. Bond Counsel -
Dorsey, Windhorst, Hannaford, Whitney & Halladay
c. Corporate Counsel -
Thompson, Hine and Flory
d, Accountant -
Coopers, Lybrand
10. WHAT I5 yOUR TARGET DATE FOR:
August 1, 1979
a. Construction start -
January 31, 1980
b. Construction completion -
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The undersigned Applicant understands that the approval or
disapproval by the City of Eden Prairie for Industrial
Development bond financing does not expressly or impliedly provision
constitute any approval, variance, nr waiver of any other rule
or requirement relating to any zoning, building,
or ordinance of the City of Eden Prairie, or any other law
applicable to the property included in this project.
Parker Hannifin Corporation
Applicant
June 14, 1979
llate
-7- _.
2-7 ,
11. Z014ING - TO BE' COULLTI.D 13Y THL CITY PLANNING DEPARTtiENT
a. Property is zoned -
b. Present zoning (is (is not) correct for the intended
use.
c. Zoning application received on. _
for which is correct for the
intended use.
d. Variances required -
- City Plannc
-8-
27'7
APPENDIX
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
The Company
Parker-IIannifin Corporation is a leading worldwide full-line manufacturer of fluid power
.systems and related components. Fluid power involves the transfer and control of power
through the medium of liquid, gas or air. Fluid power systems move and position materials,
control machines,vehicles and equipment and improve industrial efficiency and productivity.
Components of a simple fluid power system include a pump which generates pressure, valves
which control the fluid's flow, a cylinder which translates the pressure in the fluid into
mechanical energy, a filter to remove contaminants and numerous hoses, couplings, fittings,
clamps and seals.
The Company's manufacturing, service and distribution and administrative facilities are
located in 30 states, Puerto Rico and worldwide in 21 foreign countries. Its fluid handling
technology is used in the products of its three business segments: industrial, aviation/space/
marine and automotive.The products are sold as original and replacement equipment through
more than 16,000 distributors and agents and nearly 1,000 Company employed field sales-
persons. Parker products are supplied to over 100,000 customer outlets in virtually every
major manufacturing,transportation and processing industry.For the fiscal year ended June
30, 1981,industrial products accounted for 597o of net sales,aviation/space/marine products
for 22%and automotive products for 1996'.
The Company was incorporated in Ohio in 1938.Its principal executive offices are located
at 17325 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44112, telephone (216) 531-3000. As used herein,
unless the context otherwise requires, the"Company" refers to Parker-Hannifin Corporation
and its subsidiaries.
Summary Description of Business and Markets
Industrial Segment Products. The product lines of the Company's industrial segment
cover most of the components of fluid power systems. The fluid power group manufactures
pumps and power systems which generate pressure, valves, rotary actuators and controls
which monitor and regulate the flow of fluid,cylinders which convert the pressurized fluid
into mechanical energy, and filters which remove contaminants.
The fluid connectors group manufactures connectors, including tube fittings and hose
fittings, hoses, clamps and couplers which transmit and contain the fluid. The seal group
manufactures scaling devices, including o-rings and o-seals, gaskets and packing which
permit leak proof connections to be made.
The refrigeration components group manufactures components for use in air conditioning
and refrigeration systems, including pressure regulators, solenoid valves, expansion valves
and filter-dryers.
Aviation/Space,/hfarine Segment Products. The principal products of the Company's
aviation/space/marine segment are aircraft flight controls and components for various fuel-
ing operations. To varying extents, the Company's aviation/space/marine products are uti-
lized on virtually every major domestic commercial, military and general aircraft,including
helicopters.
Flight controls are the principal hydraulic systems used to control precisely the rudders,
ailerons and other aerodynamic control surfaces of fixed and rotary wing aircraft. These
systems utilize hydraulic and electro-hydraulic servo-controls and include components designed
to complex manufacturer specifications. The Company's flight controls are used on many
major domestic commercial airliners and military aircraft now in service- The Company
will provide all the primary flight controls on the Boeing 767 commercial airliner now sched-
'.Jl
uled for initial deliveries late in 1982, as well as flight controls on other aircraft now in
various stages of development.
Fueling products include components and systems for ground and in-flight fueling of air-
craft, marine fueling operations, precision components for handling of gases under pressure
and cryogenic and conventional fuels, aircraft fuel tank ine.rting and fire extinguishing sys-
tems and fuel injection nozzles.
Additional aviation/space/marine segment products include hydraulic valves, accumu-
lators,pumps, actuation devices, sealing devices,complete fluid systems for propellant han-
dling and operational control of aircraft, space vehicles, missiles and launch vehicles and
ancillary controls for gas turbine engines. In the general aviation field, it manufactures
lightweight aircraft wheels and brake assemblies and air conditioning components, various
pneumatic controls and other components.
During fiscal 1981, the Company formed a new Biomedical Products Division to develop
new applications of its advanced fluid handling technology in the medical field.No commercial
sales have been made or can be made until successful completion of lengthy government and
commercial testing procedures.
Automotive segment Products. The Company's automotive segment products include
safety products, cooling system products and specialty tools and equipment sold primarily
in the automotive aftermarket and air conditioning components sold primarily to original
equipment manufacturers.
Safety products include hydraulic brake parts, disc and drum brakes and parts, turn
signal and hazard warning flashers, windshield wiper blades and truck and car mirrors.
®. Cooling system products include hose clamps, radiator caps, thermostats and anti-freeze
testers.Other products include locking gas caps,power steering hose assemblies, tire gauges,
tire hardware, air line accessories,lubrication equipment, specialty tools and antennae.
Markets. The major markets for products of the fluid connector, fluidpower and seal
groups of the industrial segment are agricultural machinery, construction equipment, food
production, industrial machinery, instrumentation,lumber and paper, machine tools, mining,
mobile equipment,petrochemicals,textiles,transportation and virtually every major production
and process industry. Products manufactured by the industrial segment's refrigeration
components group are utilized principally in mobile air conditioning systems,industrial refrig-
eration systems and home and commercial air conditioning equipment. Sales of industrial
segment products are made to the original equipment manufacturer and replacement markets.
Industrial segment products are marketed primarily through more than 4,900 distributors
or agents. The Company also has more than 500 field salesmen who assist distributors and
service selected accounts.
Aviation/space/marine segment sales are primarily to the military,commercial and gen-
eral aviation industries. Aviation/space/marine segment products are marketed almost ex-
clusively by the Company's field sales force and are sold directly,in nearly all cases,to the
manufacturer or end user.
The majority of automotive segment products are sold to the replacement markets to
more than 11,000 warehouse distributors, jobbers, service stations and other outlets and
directly to mass merchandisers.Some of these products are also sold to automobile and truck
manufacturers for original equipment as well as replacement purposes by the Company's
field sales force.
22
2�9
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
.. The following table summarizes the consolidated results of the operations of the Company and its
subsidiaries for the five years ended June 30, 1981 and the three-month periods ended September
1980 and 1981.The amounts herein were derived from the Selected Financial Data contained in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 30-K for the year ended June 30, 1981 and its Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended September 30, 1981, which are incorporated herein by
reference. The summary should be read in connection with the selected financial data, consolidated
financial statements and related notes contained in such Annual Report and Form 10-Q. The data per-
taining to the three-month periods ended September 30, 1980 and 1981 are unaudited, and, in the
opinion of management, all adjustments,consisting only of normal recurring accruals,necessary for a
fair presentation of the results of operations for such periods has been made.
Thousands of Dollars except Per Share Amounts
Three-Months Ended.
Fiaeal Year Ended June 30, September 30,
1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1980 1981
(Unaudited)
Net Sales.............. = 615,310 $ 720,286 ¢ 892,152 $1,022,376 $1,105,891 $240,820 $2K028
Cost of sales.......................................».» 466,708 661,218 676.221 791,058 845,050 187,308 233,261
Gross profit......,................................... 150,602 178,068 216,931 231,318 260,841 63,612 $2,772
Selling,general and administrative
expenses.......:......................................_ 84,361 93,592 110,496 120,202 138,091 30,825 82,922
Income from operations.................... 76,241 84,476 106,436 111,116 122,750 22,687 19,850
Other deductions(income):
Interest expense ................................ 7,427 8,663 12,636 20,408 22,818 4,661 4.700
Interest and other income net........ (1 M) (1,439) (4,263) (1,722) (1,665) 76 (116)
Gain on disposal of land.................... - - - - (6,745) - (6,745)
6,203 7,224 8,373 18,686 14,408 4,737 (2,671)
Income before income taxes............ 69,038 77,252 98,062 92A30 108,342 17,960 22621
Income taxes............................___.. 34,360 36,436 44,866 36,456 44,280 7,718 10,99.4
Net income ...................................._.... { 34,678 { 40,816 S 53,196 S 65,974 = 64,062 10,232 $11,627
Earnings per Common Share(1):
Primary _.......................................... $1.63 $1.91 $2.43 $2.63 SL75 $.45 f A7
Fully diluted.................................- $1.58 $1.85 $2.93 $2.44 $2.66 $A4 $A5
Cash dividends per Common Share(1) _.67 $.68 $•76 $.80 {A $.22 $.24
(1) Earnings per Common Share and cash dividends amounts for the periods prior to June 30, 1981
have been restated to reflect the 3-for-2 stock split distributed to shareholders September 4, 1981.
28
2 YO
. r
Jan. 21, 1982
BFI Expansion
" Neighborhood Mtg.
at VoTec
Jean Johnson
"LAND USE" MEETING
SUMMARY OF STATEMENTS MADE BY PROPONENTS:
Dick Nowlin, Attorney, Larkin-Hoffman:
-Hennepin County Board has requested expansion of existing landfills.
-Another meeting dealing with environmental issues will be held in
2 weeks.
-Formal applications to City, County, MPCA, etc., are expected on or
about Feb. 1, 1982 and a six month review expected.
-No future expansion requests will be made.
-Planning Commission has 60 days to review application.
-Hennepin County will not review application til after City decision.
-We will know efficiency of on-site methane monitors soon.
-Surrounding property values will be enhanced.
-We will commit to this being last expansion request.
Fred Housington Planner, Brauer & Associates:
-Landfill presently has 3600 ac-ft of solid waste, expansion of 42
acres will provide an additional 3600 ac. ft. of waste fill.
-BFI will construct 7' high 60' wide berm along eastern edge of
property. Construction will take 12 months and trees will be
planted on the berm.
-16,000 ADT on 169 today. BFI has approximately 380 trucks/day.
Expansion not expected to increase truck numbers unless other
landfills close and cause more traffic to come to Flying Cloud
Landfill. (NOTE: 1980 ADT along 169 are 16,200-26,200)
-Silverwood (east-west street through Bluffs West Second) should not
be extended westward through landfill to US 169/212. Instead a
north-south road from Silverwood, just west of proposed 32+ acre
park, northward to Co. Rd. 1.
Gerald $Unde, Engineer:
-Original landfill natural kettle area is at B12 elev. and fill has
been placed approximately 110' deep.
-Possible to have uses near landfill. Hopkins old landfill is 75' from
townhouses. Townhouse units have inside methane monitors.
-landfill waste depth is 80-130' .
-landfill will be 1,000' from closest now occupied house and 700' from
closest now empty house (as construction continues, more will be closer)
-Ground water level is at 780 at north end and 730 at south end. Fill
is now 30-90' from water table.
2`��
BFI Expansion Neighborhood Mtg. 1/21/82 page 2
QUESTIONS BY AUDIENCE:
(No one gave names or addresses)
-Why does there have to be methane by product?
-Will explosions occur?
-Will there be more fires?
-Decrease in property values?
-If expansion is not permitted, what is BFI's end land use plan?
-Difficult to beleive no more expansion permits because BFI owns
100+ more acres.
-Now deep can you go before contaminating water, kerosote in St.
Louis Park has traveled 5 miles.
-When buying our homes, BFI, PCA, and City told us landfill life
was only another 2-5 years.
-Can an old dump be reopened?
-Who will build golf course?(no clear answer from proponents)
-When will BFI give City remainder of Homeward Hills ParI0(answer-
immediately upon approval)
-How will BFI control blowing dust?
-BFI never picks up all garbage that blows into residential sub-
divisions.
2192
•\7 ._1_:BUJ�,,.ii-••{r�.I'���V � ��/ «�`�' 1���1`�-� � ��,.
�I%�/ • -��f-.�:/S� S �:_ �1y tom. �ri ����,
`� / ram•. � � ��-.
. /
... _ �r ���1/�r� ., ram. •,�\,�\\�1 1. �4���,���
l� fed
cc
J
r+vW1401
►-o �/� C� ;aiy �Id�lil l
o �s'tc: '
..Ja \
2�3 "''�ya�. �Expansson A�ca show►t s�f
'v it,. - Expanswon AitfwSh"n R Qent_.
BACKGROUND REGARDING
FLYING CLOUD SANITARY LANDFILL
Woodlake Sanitary Services, Inc., (Woodlake) a wholly owned sub-
sidiary of Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. (BFI) , owns approximately
325 acres of land in Eden Prairie east from Highway 169 to Homeward
Hills Road, north to property owned by the Metropolitan Airport
Commission and south to approximately the 750-foot elevation (MSL)
on the Minnesota River Bluffs. Land use at this site is governed
by the planned unit development authorization granted by the City
of Eden Prairie in May, 1970 (PUD 70-1) .. The Flying Cloud Landfill
(Landfill) located within this area is governed by regulations of
Hennepin County (County) and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
(PCA) . The original plan for the use of this property was proposed
by Waste Management, Inc. Woodlake acquired the property from
Waste Management, Inc. in 1972 and has operated the Landfill from
that time until the present.
The land use plan approved by the City in PUD 70-1 delineated four
general land uses within the PUD. Approximately 100 acres on the
west and north sides were specified for use as two and five-acre
industrial sites. The Landfill was to be located in the area
proposed for industrial uses and elsewhere on the site. Approximately
40 acres of the property to the east was delineated for medium density
® residential use. All of the land from the bluff line down the bluff
slope to the southern boundary of the Woodlake property was desig-
nated for park-protection open space use. The PUD also proposed
the relocation of Flying Cloud Drive and the construction of a
local collector street extending east-west generally along the
bluff from County Road 18 to Highway 169.
In November, 1973, Woodlake received authorization to rezone 12 acres
of the original PUD to industrial park I-2 in order to construct
offices, garages and truck storage areas, and in 1975, BFI began
the construction of its regional headquarter facility on this land
within the southwest segment of the PUD. Construction of this
complex was completed in 1981.
In 1978, Eden Prairie's Comprehensive Plan was amended to substitute
an industrial use designation for the proposed medium density
residential use in the original land use plan. This land use change
and the rezoning noted above are the only land use changes authorized
since the approval of PUD 70-1.
The surrounding land uses abutting the Woodlake property include
the Flying Cloud Drive Inn Theater to the north, a "clear zone" for
Flying Cloud Airport runways, a produce market to the southwest,
and residential development to the southeast and east. The area
to the south is the Minnesota River Valley.
2���
f
In 1979, Woodlake entered into an option agreement with Hustad
Development Corporation governing approximately 90 acres of land
east of the PUD. In 1979 an application was made to rezone this
area from rural to low and medium density residential use. This
proposal was given preliminary approval in October of 1979 subject
to a number of contingencies including the provision of a hold-
harmless commitment reqardinq methane gas. This requirement
presented a significant obstacle and after the exploration of
possible resolution, the option was allowed to expire and control
of the property reverted to Woodlake in September, 1981.
THE LANDFILL
The bite of the Flying Cloud Landfill was identified in a report
by the Black and veetch Engineering Firm for the Metropolitan Council
in 1969 as one of the optimum sites for a major new metropolitan
area landfill. In part this identification was based on the
favorable hydrogeologic conditions of the site.
A permit (SW-14) was issued in 1970 by the PCA authorizing the
disposal of solid waste within the 225 acre Flying Cloud site. The
Landfill began operating in 1970. Revised plans for the Landfill
have been submitted and accepted by the PCA on a number of occasions
during the 1970's. Currently the Landfill is authorized to be brought
to a maximum elevation of 912 feet (MSL) with a minimum 2% grade, and
d to extend over approximately 105 acres.
"! The Landfill is located on a sandy outwash terrace adjacent to the
valley of the Minnesota River. This terrace was formed in glacial
times when the alluvial soils were deposited by the Glacial River
Warren. The entire landfill is located in areas of sand. Well logs
and borings for the site indicate the presence of silt and clay
underlying the sands at an elevation some twenty feet below the
base of refuse at the Landfill. These cohesive soils are in turn
underlain by deeper sand layers.
Groundwater in the area generally percolates through many layers of
filtering sand toward the valley of the Minnesota River which is a
discharge area for waters both in the surficial drift soils and in
the upper bedrock formations.
Wastes disposed at the Landfill come from all over the southern
Metropolitan Area including principally Bloomington, Edina, St. Louis
Park, Eden Prairie, Richfield, Rosemount, Minneapolis, and Burnsville.
Currently approximately 1,500 tons of waste are received at the fill
each day. Waste comes to the Landfill in trucks stored on the site
and in trucks owned by others. Approximately 250 trucks dispose
of waste at the Landfill during each of the five weekdays. Truck
deliveries to the Landfill occur principally during the hours of
10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Landfill truck traffic is also more intense
from 6:00 a.m. to 7:30 a.m. during weekdays when most of the residential
refuse trucks leave to pick up waste.
- 2 -
.z�5
Because of improved compaction machinery and practice, the space
occupied by a specific amount of solid waste has been significantly
reduced over the ten-year operating life of the Landfill. For this
reason and also because of the fluctuation in the amount of solid
waste received at the site, it is difficult to accurately predict
the remaining useful life of the Landfill. It is estimated that
approximately 3,600 acre feet of space remains available for filling.
At the current rate of disposal and compaction, it is expected
that the Landfill can be used for waste disposal for another five
years.
Currertly there are no specific plans for finishing the area devoted
to landfilling operations on its completion. Hennepin County and
PCA requirements necessitate the placement of appropriate cover and
vegetation on top of the completed fill area. However, no specific
landscaping or end use plan has been approved by the City, County
or PCA.
In other parts of the country, landfills have been devoted to a
wide variety of uses following their completion including industrial,
recreational and limited residential development. Subsequent reuse
must be designed with consideration given to groundwater and the
availability and capacity of public utility services, methane gas,
and the decomposition of waste material at uneven rates as it ages.
Nationally, many landfills have been devoted to recreational use
after completion. A principal example is the park reserve district
in Du Page County, Illinois. Closed landfills have also been devoted
to more intensive recreational use -- ball diamonds, athletic fields,
golf courses, etc. Examples in this area include a tournament
softball facility in Douglas County (Omaha) , Nebraska, and the
Kennedy Center in Boston, Massachusetts.
The end use of the Flying Cloud site is also impacted by its proximity
to the Flying Cloud Airport. Regulations of the Minnesota Department
of Transportation - Aeronautics Division govern the height of
structures adjacent to the clear zone as well as the nature of
certain uses. Among other elements these requirements provide that:
Uses which create interference by smoke or electronics are prohibited;
and generally the maximum height of a structure on the site south of
the MAC "clear zones" is limited to approximately 100 feet.
l
2$�0
fE on
i . .
; } .
Q!■ \� ! \} � }
!
�> %! {
. ,
41
§|
cr { � <
" �
� � ; Q.£ /ff , .! � I -• 3�7 .
fan
-
,
2-7'7
December 18, 1981
TO: Carl Jullie
THROUGH: Jack Hackin
FROM: Captain Wall
SUBJECT: Richfield/Eden Prairie Combined Police Dispatching
Since 1973, emergency police and fire radio dispatching for our city and
several others in Hennepin County, have been provided by the Sheriff's
department. As the more populus suburbs served by this system have grown,
several problems developed. The most serious of these being an overcrowded
radio frequency.
Most of us who are dependant users can't leave the system because the
federal government hasn't made VHF radio frequencies available for relief
of this congestion. Some larger suburbs, ours included, do use local
government systems to reduce car-to-car and administrative traffic on the
system, but the emergency dispatch capability has not improved. Alternatives
have been explored and one of the more practical appears to be "clustering"
arrangements between suburbs who have radio networks (Bloomington, Edina,
Richfield, Brooklyn Center, etc.) and the dependant suburbs.
We have for some time discussed the possibility of clustering with cities
close to us and have determined that a Richfield/Eden Prairie combination
would be best if this cluster option were chosen.
Meanwhile, the county recently conducted a study which concluded that an
upgrading of their system was possible and that one large consolidated
dispatch center was the most economical way to deliver radio services.
Certain costs would be reduced by such a system, however the quality of
services received by a given community is a different matter entirely.
This loss of quality is the primary reason that cities such as Bloomington,
Richfield, Edina, Golden Valley and others left the Sheriff's network several
years ago. We experience these problems now and are convinced that they would
increase if the dispatch center is enlarged and further de-personalized. The
following are some of the shortcomings of service provided by a consolidated
center: Lack of concern for our department's philosophy of operation (most
citizens who call feel they were cut short), little sensitivity to problems
of specific neighborhoods in our community, unresponsiveness to input of users
of the system, constant and frequent turnover of dispatchers as opposed to
career specialists, dispatch personnel have virtually no knowledge of our
ordinances or street locations.
I
��j
Carl Jullie/Jack Hacking
�. December 18, 1981
Page 2
These are only a few of the problems we experience today and will continue
to experience as dependants on this network. Most of these not only tend
to destroy the relationship that we've strived to maintain with our community,
but affect the morale of our officers as well. Attached is an estimate of cost
for a feasibility study of a possible Richfield/Eden Prairie radio cluster
arrangement. This consultant is recommended because he designed the entire
radio network for Richfield and is in the best position to provide the data
we require. We would appreciate your consideration of funds for this study
so we can see if pursuing this plan is as cost effective as it is operationally
pratical.
2 A9
W. M. Montgomery
&Associates
3618 Rainbow Drive.Minnetonka,Minnesota 55343.Telephone(612)473-6985
December 16, 1981
Captain Keith Wall, Police Division
Department of Public Safety
city of Eden Prairie
7905 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Dear Captain Wall:
Thank you for your invitation to quote professional engineering
services. We propose to make an investigation of technical re-
requirements for Eden Prairie to receive public safety dispatch
service from the City of Richfield. The investigation will de-
velop system design options with associated estimated cost to
address the following questions:
1. What equipment should be installed in Eden Prairie and/or
what changes in equipment should be made in Richfield to offer
two way radio communication to mobile units in Eden Prairie
using the Richfield police frequency 155,790 kHz and Richfield
fire frequency 154,205 kHz? How would this change affect Eden
Prairie radios leased from Hennepin County?
2. What embellishments would be required to equipment confi-
gurations suggested in (1) above to offer two way communications
on the Richfield frequencies to an officer on foot in Eden
Prairie?
3. What change would be required to Eden Prairie fire pagers to
accept radio alerts on the Richfield fire frequency using the
Richfield pager encoder? Would the cost be less if Richfield
made a change in their pager encoding capability?
4. What change would be required in Richfield station equip-
ment on the fire frequency to deliver reliable radio paging
throughout E en Prairie? What change would be required in Rich-
field station equipment on the Police frequency to deliver re-
liable radio paging throughout Ern Prairie? Should all paging
be done on only one frequency?
Communications Systems;Planning&Engineering
y
Captain Keith Wall -2- December 16, 1981
5. Now might Eden Prairie public safety administrators contact
their people directly from Eden Prairie headquarters? Hear all
dispatches from Richfield?
6. Now can Richfield operate on the Eden Prairie 800 mHz radio
channels? Should Eden Prairie police and fire be dispatched on
the existing Eden Prairie 800 mHz radio system with no tie to the
Richfield 150 mHz police and fire channels? Now would this option
affect Eden Prairie police and fire portable radios?
7. What radio channels of Eden Prairie neighbors should be moni-
tored at Richfield? Is the existing Richfield scanning receiver
adequate to this task? Should the Richfield dispatcher have two
way radio contact with any of these neighbors?
8. If radio control circuits are required between Eden Prairie
and Richfield, how might this be accomplished with microwave?
With wireline?
We propose to investigate these questions and suggest candidate
{ system configurations to answer each question. In some instances
the choice of system configuration will depend only upon cost and
reliability. However, in other situations the choice will depend
upon administrative philosophy and command/control decisions. We
will not attempt to adjudicate these decisions but will only pre-
sent the candidate systems and associated costs. Results of our
investigation will be presented in a report 60 days after Notice
to Proceed for a total cost of $5,000. We ask payment of $2,500
thirty days after receipt of Notice to Proceed and the balance
upon presentation of the final report. This quotation is firm
for sixty days from date.
If Eden Prairie joins Richfield in a consolidated public safety
dispatch operation, it is probable the venture will require addi-
tional engineering services to detail equipment choices, prepare
technical specifications for competitive bid, examine and comment
upon bids received, provide technical oversight during construc-
tion and make proof of performance tests of the expanded radio
system. It is not possible to determine what these professional
fees would be at this time but it would probably run in the
$5,000 - $7,000 range. A firm quotation could be offered only
when the system configuration decisions have been made which are
expected to flow from the final report of the instant project.
r
2�1
r-
Captain Keith Wall -3- December 16, 1981
Attached is a summary of our professional qualifications for this
work together with a few project references to illustrate the
nature and quality of recent work. Please feel free to contact
any of the named officials. If favored with your award you may
be assured it will receive the careful attention which has been
characteristic of our work.
Very truly yours,
W.M. Montgomery
cc: Jack Hacking
Tom Morgan
Paul Linnee
Z92
i
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
W. M. Montgomery
W, M. Montgomery is a registered professional engineer in
Minnesota plus Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois and Ohio. He holds
a degree in electrical engineering from Northwestern University,
Evanston, Illinois. Additionally, he holds a first class
radiotelephone license and for some years held radio call W9TW.
He has been involved in system design, application engineering,
installation and maintenance of radio systems since 1952.
Montgomery has managed his own consulting business since 1970.
Montgomery has designed and provided technical management for
more than 125 public safety radio systems varying from simple
one-station rural installations to large multi-county networks
and statewide systems. These projects have included relay
stations, microwave and backbone systems, satellite receivers,
regional dispatch centers and data systems. Montgomery developed
the Minnesota plan for police communications which became the
base for all LEAA funding in the state and was filed with the
FCC to become the base for all frequency assignments in the
police radio service in Minnesota. Montgomery has furnished
engineering services for most of the public safety radio systems
in Minnesota.
The Wisconsin Council on Criminal Justice engaged Montgomery in
1974 to furnish consulting engineering services to police depart-
ments in that state. Since 1974, Montgomery has designed, speci-
fied and furnished technical management for almost all federally
funded police communication renovations in Wisconsin.
z93
The U.S. Department of Justice engaged Montgomery for two years
at the height of the LEAA radio funding activity to review tech-
nical requirements of radio systems prepared by other consultants
and to offer professional opinions where problems developed between
vendors and grantees which couldn't be resolved at the local level.
Montgomery provided design and specification services to one of
the largest utilities in the midwest for a microwave system
running through Wisconsin and Minnesota. The system connects
nuclear and coal fired generating plants with the general office
and load dispatcher for voice communications and telemetry.
A contract was executed for 19 electric cooperatives to analyze
radio communication requirements, coverage, intercommunication
and system configurations to enhance mutual aid in times of.
local distress.
Recommendations for design and specification for a load management
system was made to a generation and transmission electric co-
operative to manage electric load for 23 cooperatives serving
parts of Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota and Iowa.
Montgomery is presently under contract in Iowa to develop a
radio communication plan for emergency medical services which
will cover about two-thirds of the population of the state.
He is also under contract to the Metropolitan Council of the
Twin Cities area (Minneapolis-St. Paul) to develop and specify
an emergency medical communications system for the eastern half
of the metropolitan area and comment upon work done by others
for the western part of the area.
(
29�
( Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area
300 Metro Square Building
Seventh & Robert Streets
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Robert Scarlett,
Program Manager
632-291-6494
The Metrololitan Council is a Minnesota unit of government with
certain planning, taxing, and operational responsibilities for
public services in the seven county Minneapolis-St. Paul area.
Montgomery furnished planning and engineering services to the
Council for a hospital/ambulance communications system for the
eastern half of the metropolitan area. The system uses a micro-
wave backbone with uhf radio to furnish both voice and bio-med-
ical telemetry contact between the EMS technician in the field
and the resource hospital. The resource hospital communications
console operator can include the receiving hospital in the radio
circuit to monitor the conversation between field attendants
and hospital physician as well as transmit telemetry to the
receiving hospital.
Recommendations made for this work were accepted by the Council
in January, 1981. ?rocurement is scheduled for later in 1981.
Robert Scarlett, above, assumed EMS planning responsibilities
for the Metropolitan Council after the EMS Report was accepted.
Program Manager for the Council at the time the work was done
was Jeffrey Meyer, now at St. Paul Ramsey Hospital, St. Paul
Minnesota, 612-221-3456.
295
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
James Lindsay, Police Chief
612-561-5440
.......-...
Communication systems for police, fire and public works depart-
ments were measured for performance and recommendations made -
for improvement. A complete performance profile was drawn for
all city radio communications from which could be drawn easily
demonstrable conclusions why each system performed as it did
and exactly what would be required to make suggested improve-
ments. Police traffic was measured daily for a month to
identify busy periods, radio channel loading, and interference.
The data provided a firm foundation to support each recommen-
dation. Each recommendation carried an estimated capital cost
and maintenance expense based on current bid results from other
similar projects.
The City Council is expected to authorize and fund a communication
upgrading project for 1982.
29�
City of Brooklyn Park
5800 85th Avenue, North
Brooklyn'Park, Minnesota 55443
Richard Hennenberger, City Manager
Donald E. Davis, Chief of Police
612-425-4502
Brooklyn Park, a Minneapolis suburb of 43,000 population,
receives all public safety dispatch services from the Hennepin
County Sheriff Department. Montgomery was retained to study
the existing dispatch system and make recommendations for
improvement for both citizen access to emergency services and
radio dispatch of police and fire departments.
t Project work included monitoring police and fire calls, ride-
along with police officers, attendance at training sessions,
and interviews with firemen, patrol officers, department ad-
ministrators and city management. Fourteen recommendations
were made which covered everything from records and computer
support services to dispatch procedures and management. Each
recommendation which carried financial implications for the
City was associated with an estimated capital and maintenance
budget.
St. Paul Police Department
110 West loth Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Phil Sanders, Supt. of Communications
612-292-3599
The St. Paul Police Department completely replaced its
communications system under the design and specification
prepared by Montgomery. The system includes five duplex
uhf channels for voice dispatch and data communications plus
another uhf channel .to be shared with the Ramsey County
Sheriff for coordination between departments. The St. Paul
system includes a network of satellite receivers which
provides excellent communication to officers on foot regard-
less of their location in the city. Also included is a
77.
special paging system accessible from any telephone within
the police department from which pages may be transmitted
throughout the city. Installation of all new equipment was
made without ever taking the department off the air even
though the entire dispatch center equipment was replaced at
the same location. Through careful programming and pre-test
of sub assemblies, the entire dispatch center was changed from
old equipment to new in only eight hours.
29 g
City of Appleton, Wisconsin
David Gorski, Chief
Appleton Police Department
222 South Walnut Street
Appleton, Wisconsin 54911
414-735-5562
A comprehensive evaluation was made for radio communications used
by police, fire, public works, parks and recreation, and miscel-
laneous users in the city. Technical performance measurements
were made on all fixed stations used by the city plus representa-
tive mobile and portable radios. Special monitoring equipment was
used to measure radio traffic on the police channels including
unwanted signals from other licensees on the frequencies. Equip-
ment used measured number of transmissions made by dispatchers
and field officers, air time occupied by radio transmissions by
dispatchers and by field units, and recorded all squelch tones
heard on the channels.
The report included color photographs of all municipal radio
installations with special photos of installation details which
are related to findings of fact noted in the report. Recommen-
dations are made to improve communications security, protect
against equipment failure, and adequately serve small municipal
departments. Each recommendation includes estimated cost and
benefit to the city. j
i
The Citv awarded a contract to W.M. Montgomery in 1981 to imple-
ment recommendations of the 1980 project.
Jefferson County, Wisconsin
Keith Mueller, Sheriff
Courthouse
r
Jefferson, Wisconsin 53549
608-674-2122
Police, fire and ambulance communications for all public safety
agencies in the county were studied for adequacy, integrity
of communications and opportunity for combined dispatch. A
detailed monitoring program was instituted to establish radio
traffic loading on the police channels by the various agencies
in the county. Recommendations for improvements are based upon
measured data rather than general system models for areas of
similar populations. Each recommendation is noted with its
estimated cost.
4 All recommendations were accepted by the county in 1980 and j
Montgomery has been retained to provide complete technical
management for the communications system improvement including
preparation of technical specifications, preparation of invita-
tion to bid, professional opinion on bids received and recommen-
dation for contract award, engineering supervision of equipment
installation, and proof of performance tests.
i
3Co
( Milwaukee Police Department
749 West State Street
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
Frank Sepic, Superintendent of Communications
414-273-8660, extension 471
This project included installation and test of a mobile data
system connected directly to the city computer as well as State
of Wisconsin Department of Transportation and criminal files,
National Crime Information Center, and National Law Enforcement
Teletype System. This project is unusual to the extent we
furnished equipment as well as professional services for the
test system. All computer software was furnished as part of the
project.
The test system report was delivered to the client in March, 1980.
Based on the report and experience developed in the test system,
the administration of this 2300 person department is making plans
to implement a large mobile data system.
77
3UI
Dane County
202 Monona Avenue
Madison, Wisconsin .53709
Captain David Niemann, Sheriff Department
608-266-4378
James Crooks, Communications Coordinator
60R-266-4150
A complete emergency medical services communication system was
designed, specified and placed in service for all providers in
the county except the City of Madison. The City of Madison
receives EMS service through the Fire Department which uses its
own radio system. The new EMS communications network provides
multiple communication paths for all hospitals and ambulance
services in the county plus accommodates special coordination
requirements to area police and fire departments. Although
dedicated radio channels are assigned for use by regular EMS
providers, any radio equipped person or vehicle at the municipal,
county or state level which is assigned to the area will be able
to talk with any other such person or vehicle by radio, telephone
or combination radio/telephone. The system provides facilities
to alert volunteer ambulance crews in rural areas and accept
prompt acknowledgement that alerted volunteer crews have responded.
Radio equipped vehicles which infrequently visit Madison can be
accommodated and patched to any hospital, public safety or EMS
provider without special requirements for visiting ambulances.
The entire system is managed through a single communications center .
which can be backed up through the sheriff's radio system or
managed with lesser total flexibility from any Madison hospital.
Redundancy has been achieved to cover various equipment failures
or combinations of failures without duplicating all equipment.
3W
Sheboygan County Sheriff Department
615 North Sixth Street
Sheboygan, Wisconsin 53081
Inspector Eugene Paulson
414-459-3111
The Sheboygan County Sheriff together with municipal police
departments in the county participated in this county-wide
communication project. A new repeater site was established
for the county which together with two microwave controlled .
satellite sites offers portable radio coverage to the officer
on foot throughout the county. Leased lines were eliminated
from the system configuration while system integrity was im-
proved. The Sheriff has a completely new dispatch console
which includes computer aided dispatch and information retrieval
through a local computer file and the Wisconsin TIME system.
The computer aided dispatch and information retrieval system
was handled "in house" by the county and incorporated into the
console design by Montgomery.
A receiver voting system is used to assure reliable coverage
along the bottom of the bluffs of the Lake Michigan shoreline
as well as the far western reaches of the county. Dependable
communications is now available to the foot officer at the
Road America race track in the northwestern corner of the county
which is the site of some of the nation's largest auto racing
crowds.
1
3�3 -
Rock County Sheriff Department
P.O. Box 627
Janesville, Wisconsin 53545
Captain Joseph M. Ash
608-755-2250
Ti,e radio communication system for the Sheriff Department and
participating municipal police departments was replaced. The
Sheriff Department police and fire dispatch center was remodeled
and a new dispatch console installed. Four satellite sites
are controlled by microwave from the new dispatch center in -
addition to a new repeater and base station site. The satellite
receiver system provides county wide communications to an officer
on foot on either of two radio channels.
All recommendations for system improvement were accepted by the
County. Montgomery managed frequency coordination, license
preparation, technical specifications, invitation to bid,
bidders conference, recommendation for contract award, engineering
supervision of system installation and proof of performance tests.
The project was finished on schedule and operates as specified..
3oq
Columbia County Sheriff Department
707 East Cook Street
Portage, Wisconsin 53901
William R. Monthey, Sheriff
608-742-4166
The radio communication system for the Sheriff Department and
municipal police agencies in the county was renovated as part
of this project. Four satellite equipment sites are controlled
by microwave from the dispatch center in addition to the main
repeater site. Failure of any station or microwave path would
not cripple the system although equipment has not been duplicated
to achieve system integrity. The department enjoys portable radio
coverage throughout the county.
Montgomery prepared a series of system recommendations for the
renovation which were accepted by the county. He then managed
frequency coordination, license preparation, technical specif.i-
cations, invitation to bid, recommendation for contract award,
engineering supervision of system installation and proof of
performance tests.
2 2/82 - 2:00 PM
Carl:
I
Dean E IStrom called and said it is doubtful he
will b able to attend the Council meeting this
evenin ,as he has out-of-town business in from
New Yo
He has ollowing concerns:
A. �DB's for Twin City Christian Homes - some
ings don't make sense. 1) talking about
blic sale which is unlike others, 2) no
iperating history whatsoever - John's memo-
anflicts with one in application as John's
mo says it is a newly formed corporation,-
- hd in the application it says they.have-been
Perating since 1970 (pg. 253 of packet).
ood language in resolution giving :City_
discretion of a feasibility report- Dean is
9t against group or project, .but more
ncerned about a public offering as this is
tested.
B. uide Plan: Joke:- Maybe we should pasta
esolution to start updating the guide::plan
Ecess. Serious - Ask Roger Pauly if there
any problem at this time of adopting the
de plan that shows some uses that we have
h ready changed.
C. Lndfill: Dean has a lot of concerns about
he landfill which he will discuss with you
't a later time. He is for the.idea of
iring a consultant.
Otherle, he has no problems with items on the
agenda that he can see. Joyce
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John Frane
DATE: January 28, 1982
RE: Preliminary approval of MID8's Twin City Christian Homes
(Castle Ridge Care Center) $2,800,000 - Resolution #82-30
The applicant is a non-profit corporation sponsored by the Minnesota
Baptist Conference of 140 churches. The company owns the land and
intends to finish construction of the 60 bed nursing home at Castle
Ridge and operate it; employment would be about 75 people.
They are requesting preliminary approval for a public offering of
the bonds. Because the company is newly formed it does not have
a financial history, however, projected financial statements indicate
the project can be self-sustaining; a feasability report will be
prepared before the sale of bonds begins. This feasability report
should be transmitted to the City in time for review at a council
meeting prior to sale of-bonds.
i -
Resolution 82-30 is included for your consideration.
1t
s
i
f
t
2y9
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA
Application for
Industrial Development Bond Project Financing
1. APPLICANT:
a. Business Name:
Twin City Christian Homes
b. Business Address:
8400 Schooner Boulevard
Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344
C. Business Form(corporation,partnership,sole proprietorship,etc.):
Not-for-profit Corporation
d. State of Incorporation or organization:
Minnesota
e. Authorized Representative:
Bruce Farrington,President
f. Phone:
941-0305
Z. NAME(S) AND ADDRESSES OF MAJOR PRINCIPALS:
Term Expires 198Z Term Expires 1983 Term Expires 1984
John W.Fuller,Director Ronald Haar,Director J.Leonard Carroll,Director
10111 S.Cedar Lake Rd. 7530 Market Place Drive 1305- 18th Ave. S.
Minnetonka,MN 55343 Eden Prairie,MN 55344 St.Cloud,MN 56301
Home: (61Z)544-4593 Home: (61Z)545-9387 Home: (61Z)Z51-48Z6
Office: (61Z)941-0305 Office: (61Z)Z51-48Z5
Al Hagen,Director Philip Hansen,Director Bruce Farrington,President
Z530 Casco Point 1566 Briardale Road and Director
Wayzata,MN 55391 Fridley,MN 5543Z 1Z8Z0 Welcome Lane
Home: (61Z)471-7376 Home: (61Z)571-6525 Burnsville,MN 55337
Office: (61Z)546-3351 Office: (61Z)571-6525 Home: (61Z)890-5086
Office: (61Z)94.1-0305
250
NAMES) AND ADDRESSES OF MAJOR PRINCIPALS CONTINUED:
Term Expires 1982 Term Expires 1983 Term Expires 1984
K.William Hagstrom,Director Roger Johnson,Treasurer Dean Lundholm,Director
3220 Lake Johanna Blvd. and Director 5205 Hodgson Road
St.Paul,MN 55112 1732 Alton Road Shoreview,MN 55112
Home: (612)633-2934 New Brighton,MN 55112 Home: (612)483-0257
Office: (612)631-1024 Home: (612)636-2273
Office: (612)373-4937
Paul Redin,Vice President Cavou: Justus,Secretary Victor Swenson,Director
and Director and Director Route 19 Box 315
Z284 Sierra Drive 6601 Kenney Place Mankato,MN 56001
White Bear Lake,MN 55110 Edina,MN 55435 Home: (507)625-6803
Home: (612)4Z9-2908 Home: (612)941-8214 Office: (607)389-6266
Office: (612)638-6459
Gordon Russell,Director Paul Wick,Director Howard Wallin,Director
5151 Alameda 13708 Greenbriar 1737 Cope Ave. East
St.Paul,MN 55112 Minnetonka,MN 55343 Maplewood, MN 55109
Home: (612)484-1068 Home: (612)935-5797 Home: (612)633-5108
N' Office: (612)789-3591 Office: (612)770-6989
IL Officio
Richard Turnwall
3. GIVE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF BUSINESS,PRINCIPAL PROD-
UCTS,ETC:
Provide residential care for the elderly.
4. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT.
60 skilled bed care center to be attached to Castle Ridge
Condominiums
a. Location and intended use:
8400 Schooner Boulevard
Eden Prairie-Health Care Facility
b. Present ownership of project site:
Twin City Christian Homes
I
2sl