HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 01/05/1982JOHN D. FRANE
IlLESDAY, JANUARY 5, 1982
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
7:30 PM, CITY HALL
Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Dean
Edstrom, Paul Redpath and George Tangen
City Manager Carl Jullie; City Attorney Roger
Pauly; Finance Director John Franc; Planning
Director Chris Enger; Director of Community
Services Bob Lambert; Director of Public Works
Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen
Michael
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL STAFF:
INVOCATION: Councilman Paul Redpath
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
'
7/7
A 4fr''
A. Minutes of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, December 15, 1981
B. Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held Saturday, December
19, 19e.1
Ill. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Request to set Public Hearing for Municipal Industrial Develonent
Ponds for Twin City Nursing Homes in the amount of-f2,800,000.00
for .1:6)r -oar/J., 1982
Page 1
Page 10
B. Annual renewal of Joint. Use Rental Agreement with Metropolitan Waste Page 11
Control Corfarission (Resolution No 82-12)
C. Agreement between City of Eden Prairie/Chicago & North we stern Railroad/ Page 12
Mu/DOT for instillation of_Lijnals at Birch Island Road crossing
(Resolution No. 82-13)
D. Plan a.pproyal for safety nrojects by Mr:IA.10T within TH 169 right-of-wily_ Page 13
(Chanhassen to Flying Cloud Airport) (Resolution No. 82-14)
F. Receive Feasibility Report for Mitchell Road/McCes Drive and set Page 14
Public Hearing for FeOruary2, 19W1 at 7:30 PM --(Resolution No.
82-151-
Page 1'..J
F. 2nd Reading_of Ordinance No. 81-22 and a_p_nreval of Mid-America Homes
Peyelopff's Actreewent for Olfice zonincj on 2.2 acres north of
1H 5 and east of Chester's .
G. Clerk's License List
Page 21
H. Renuest for a Public Hearing on February 2, 1982 for the removal of
Page u
Diseased Trees from_private prnperty
jty Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,Jan. 5, 1982
I. Change Order for Community Center Page 29
1111
A. woopum HFIGHTS_kyldman_Lumber. Request for POD Development plan Page 31
approval, rezoning from Rural to PM 6.5 and R1-13.5, preliminary
plat approval for 54 single family lots and 96 attached units, and
approval of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet and variances.
Located in the southwest corner of Townline Road and Duck Lake
Road. (Res. 82-07 - POD; Res, No. 82-08 - prel. plat; Res. No.
82-09 - LAW; and Ord. No. 82-01 - rezoning)
B. CNR GmEm sukp EAsT by Condon-Naegele Realty Co. Request for POD Page 76
Concept approval, PUD Development Stage approval, preliminary platting
for 8 office sites and 1 restaurant and variances. Located west
of Vikiiigs Winter Park, north of 1-494, and south of Nine Mile Creek.
(Res. No. 82-10 - PUD, and Res. No. 82-11 - prel. plat)
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 9738 - 9825; 9826 - 9988
VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
VII. APPOINTMENTS
A. Metropolitan League of Municipalities - Appointment of 1 Representative
and 4 ATie-rnates
B. Health Officer - Appointment of 1 Health Officer for the year 1982.
Appointment by Mayor with consent of Council
C. South Hennepin Human Services Council - Appointment of 2 Representatives
to serve 2 year terms commencing 2/1/82
D. NAFTA Board - Appointment of 1 Representative to serve a 1 year term
commencing 1/1/82
VIII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 82-01, designating the official meeting dates, time Page 110
and place for the City of Eden Prairie Council members in 1982
and appointing an Acting Mayor
B. Resolution No. 82-02, designating the official City Newspaper
C. Resolution No. 82-03, authorizing City Officials to transact bankirig
business _ _ .
O. Resolution No. 82-04, authorizing . use of facsimile signatures by Public Page 118
Officials
E. Resolution No. 82-05, designating depositories Page 119
F. Resolution No. 82-06, author the treasurer to invest City of Eden Page itl.)
Prairie funds
Page 108
Page 111
Page 117
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,Jan. 5, 1982
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
B. Report of City Attorney
C. Report of City Mana er
1. Set MarcIa 19P,2 as the date for a Referendum to allow the
City to c nue to sell liquor off-sale
2. Appointment of City Attorney for 1982
D. Report of Director of Commur ,ty Services •
1. Snowmobile operation on lakes and parks Page 121
2. Status report on Community Center & request to approve Handicapped Page 122
Fees
NEW BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1981
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL STAFF:
7:30 PM, CITY HALL
Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, George Bentley, Dean
Edstrom, Paul Redpath, and George Tangen
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City Attorney Ropen
Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Planning
Director Chris Enger, City Engineer Eugene A.
Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael
INVOCATION: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: all were present
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following items were added to the Agenda: IX, C. 2. Newsletter Publication,
IX. C. 3. Employee Benefits, and IX. C. 4. Transportation Advisory Board.
The following items were removed from the Consent Calendar: III. D. to IX. B. 1.
2nd Readino of Ordinance No. 81-26, rezoning from Rural to Regional Commercial
Service for Kentucky Fried Chicken (west of #169 & south of Harcreins-rby Delaria
Kitchens and developer's agreement and III. F. to IX. B. 2. Final —it approval
for Eden Glen 2nd Addition 7-Delaria's Kentucky Fried Chicken) Resolution No. 81-244
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Agenda as amended an
d
published. Motion carried unanimously.
II. MINUTES
A. Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday, November 10, 1981
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Edstrom, to approve the minutes of the
Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday, November 10, 1981. Motion carried
unanimously.
B. Minutes of the Canvassing Board meeting held Tuesday, November 17, 1981
MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the minutes of the
Canvassing Board held Tuesday, November 17, 1981. Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes -2- December 15, 1981
C. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, November 17, 1981
Page 2, last para., 3rd line: change "grains" to "grain."
Page 4, item C., 3rd para., 2nd line: change "it" to "in."
Page 6, 2nd para., line 1: change "rational" to "rationale"; line 2: change
"parking lot to be flipped" to "construction phases of the parking lots to be
reversed;" and last para., 4th line: change "flipped" to "remain as per ori-
ginal plan."
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to approve the minutes of the
regular Council meeting held Tuesday, November 17, 1981, as amended. Motion
carried unanimously.
D. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, December I, 1981
Page 3, last para., 3rd sentence: change "should be affected" to "cost to
the renter should be reduced."
Motion: Tangen moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the minutes of the
Council meeting held December 1, 1981, as amended. Motion carried with
Redpath abstaining.
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. 2nd Reading_of Ordinance No. 81-27, rezonincLop roximately 10 acres from
R1-13,5 to RO 6.5 (dupjexes) for Overlook Place Pioneer Trail & Creek Knoll
Roil). by Hustad Development Corporation and Developer's Agreement
C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 81-27, rezoning from Rural to Public for Wood-
dale Baptist Church (west of Flying Cloud Drive and south of Shady Oak Road)
and Developer's Agreement
D. 2nd Readinaof Ordinance 81-26, rezoning from Rural to Regional Commercial
Service for Kentucky Fried Chicken &est of #169 and south of Hardee's) by
Delaria's Kitchens aTa—beveToper's Agreement - moved to IX. B. 1.
E. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 81-21, rezoning 8 acres from Rural to RM 2.5
for construction of 2 buildiggs for _a total of 124 condominiums for Preserve
Condominiums (south of Anderson Lakes Parkway and east of Preserve Boulevard
by Prairie Lakes Corporation and Developer's Agreement
F. Final _plat approval for Eden Glen 2nd Addition (Delaria's Kentucky Fried Chicken)
Resolution No. 81-2447) - moved to IX. B. 2.
G. Sunnybrouk Road haprovements, Change Order No. 1, I.C. 51-381 (Sunnybrook Road
east of Homeward Hills Roadr--
City Council Minutes -3- December 15, 1981
H. Round Lake Area Utilities, Chan oe Order No. I, I.C. 51-315 & I.C. 51-351
(t of Round Lake, north of TH 5)
I. Receive petition for sewer and water improvements on Kilmer Avenue at Atherton
and authorize the preparation of a feasibility report, I.C. 52-6 -01-1-Resolution
No. 81-245-)
J. Set Public Hearing to consider vacation of West 72nd Street. between CSAH 4
and Duck Lake Road for January 19, 1982 at 7:30 p.m. 4"
K. Agreement between City of Eden Prairie/Chicago & Northwestern Railroad/Mn/Dot
for installation of railroad signals at Riley Lake Road (Resolution No. 81-246)
•
L. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 81-11, rezoninj from Rural to RM 6.5 for Bluff's
East (south of Co. Rd. 1 and west of Franlo 07)--by Rusted Development Cor-
poration and Developer's Agreement
M. Final approval for Municipal Industrial Develorent Bonds in the amount of
$-690,350 (Resolution No. 81-2475nd $142,576 (Resolution No. 81-248) for
Volunteers of America
N. Final approval for Municipal Industrial Develgppent Bonds in the amount of
$Y42,240 (Resolution No. 81-249) and $-48,450 (Resolution No. 81-25.0)----Town
8 Country Claim Service
O. Final approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of
$314,420 (Resolution No. 81-25f1 and $62,884 (Resolution No. 81-252-Ffor
Spencer Dean, Sr.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to approve items A - C, E, and G - 0
on the Consent Calendar with items M-N-0 subject to final review by the City Attor-
ney. Motion carried unanimously.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Reconvene Public Hearing for Westwood Industrial Park and adjacent area im-
provements and authorize preparation of plans and specificiations, I.C. 52-015
(south of Co. Rd. 67, west of Baker Road) - continued from December 1, 1981,
-(Resolution No. 81-237T
City Engineer Dietz spoke to the proposal.
Mayor Penzel asked if Richard Anderson is still involved with the project.
Mr. Anderson said he is; Al Michels, attorney for Bury & Carlson concurred.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to close the Public Hearing and
to adopt Resolution No. 81-237, ordering preparation of plans and specifications
for Westwood Industrial Park and adjacent properties subject to modifications
by City Attorney Pauly. Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes -4- December 15, 1981
B. SGL Office/Warehouse by SGL, Inc. Request to rezone from Rural to 1-5 and
prelipinary .plat approximatelL8.3 acres for construction of an office ware-
house building. Located south of Eaton CharLynn and north of Eden Prairie
United Methodist Church (Ordinance No. 81-31 and Resolution No. 81-241)
Don Goetzman, President of SGL, spoke to the proposal. Gary Yenger, represent-
ing Tipton Corporation, which is connected with the construction of the building,
noted the building will be "built to suit the occupant."
Planning Director Enger stated the Planning Commission had recommended approval
of the rezoning and preliminary plat at its November 9, 1981, meeting subject
to Staff recommendations contained in the Staff Report of November 6, 1981.
This proposal was not reviewed by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
Commission.
Edstrom asked how many employees will be located at this facility. Yenger
thought about 85.
Tangen inquired how this relates to the Highway 212 corridor. Enger said this
parcel is right in the center of the diagonal route. This parcel has been land-
locked for years. He noted there is still quite a distance between where this
building will be built and the CharLynn building to the north; the City will be
placing a road in the center of the 212 corridor.
City Engineer Dietz reported on the status of the feasibility reports for
projects in this area. They will be presented to the Council early in 1982.
Penzel said he is concerned about the access and has strong reservations about
access in this area.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to close the Public Hearing and
to give 1st Reading to Ordinance 81-31. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to adopt Resolution No. 81-241,
approving the preliminary plat of SGL Office/Warehouse. Motion carried unan-
imously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to request Staff to draft a Developer'
Agreement subject to the recommendations contained in the Staff Report and the
recommendations of the Planning Conmission. Motion carried unanimously.
V. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
City Manager Jullie said the Development Commission has requested a special meeting
with the Council to consider the merits of a Reserve Fund Vehicle proposal with
respect to Industrial Development Revenue Bonds. The Development Conmdssion had
met on December 4th with representatives from O'Connor & Hannan regarding this issue
and would like the Council to hear about it also.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to schedule a special meeting of the
City Council and the Development Commission for 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, January 19,
1982, prior to the regular City Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
LI
City Council Minutes -5- December 15, 1981
VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to approve Payment of Claim
s
N
o
s
.
9506 - 9736 and 9739. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tang
e
n
a
n
d
Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
VII. PETITIONS, REqUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Kinder-Care Learning Center nt Kinder-Care Learning Centers. Request for site
Elan amendment to locate a Kinder-Care Learning Center in an Office District.
Located north of TN 5 and east of Chester's Restaurant.
Robert Fors, representing Kinder-Care Learning Centers, spoke to the pro-
posal.
Planning Director Enger noted the original proposal which was for
an office building with a wood exterior. The day care center usage is
allowed in the office district. The building,which is bricks, is suitable
for use as an office.
Penzel asked if the bell tower falls into the sign category. The concen
s
u
s
was that it depends on the interpretation of Ordinance 261.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the site plan am
e
n
d
-
ment for a reduced square footage building under the condition that all
r
o
o
f
surfaces be of the same color (brown.) Motion carried unanimously.
B. rinal approval for Munichal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of
T250,000 for Kinder-Care (Resolution No. 81-243)
MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt Resolution No. 81
-
2
4
3
,
final approval for Minnesota Industrial Revenue Bonds for Kinder-Care in
t
h
e
amount of $250,000. Motion carried unanimously.
C. AID Insurance Company. by AID Insurance Company. Request for site plan review
and apEroval of Registered Land Survey to divide 7.7 acres zoned Office into
2 lots and to construct an office on the southerly five acres. Located approxi-
mately 1500 feet southeast of Hartford Insurance Company, 11000 Prairie L
a
k
e
s
Drive.
Scott Stouffer, architect, spoke to the proposal.
Planning Director Enger stated the Planning Commission had reviewed the p
r
o
-
posal at its December 14, 1981, meeting and had recommended approval of t
h
e
Registered Land Survey and the site plan subject to the recommendations i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
in the December 19, 1981, Staff Report.
City Council Minutes -6- December 15, 1981
The Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission did not review this
proposal because it is a part of the Preserve Plan (therefore cash park fees
are not applicable) and the Anderson Lakes Wildlife Area.
Concerns were expressed as to what will happen to the two acre parcel which
will be left after this parcel is subdivided. Enger said it would be best
if this two acre parcel were made a part of the parcel north of it.
City Engineer Dietz will contact Hartford's engineer to discuss drainage
problems in the area.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to approve the site plan amend-
ment and to approve a Registered Land Survey for re-subdivision of Prairie
Lakes Business Park. Motion carried unanimously.
D. Request from Richard Miller Homes for a 1-year extension on the Mitchell
Heights Townhouse Developer's .Agrgement
Edstrom noted he would abstain from discussion on this item because the
law firm with which he is associated represents Richard Miller.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to grant a one-year extension
on the Developer's Agreement for Mitchell Heights Townhouse development.
Motion carried with Edstrom abstaining.
VIII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 81-20, rezoning from Rural to 1-2 for Westwood
Industrial Park_Pst of St. John's and south of Co. Rd7 -619 by Richard N.
Anderson, Inc., and Developer's Agreement - continued from December 1, 1981
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to give 2nd Reading to Ordinance
81-20, rezoning from Rural to 1-2 for Westwood Industrial Park. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Developer's Agree-
ment for Westwood Industrial Park as modified. Motion carried unanimously.
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
Fenzel - noted a copy of a letter to Charles Weaver, Chairman of the Metropolitan I
Council, from Richard M. Feerick regarding the City West proposal. Mr. Feerick
outlined his opposition to the proposal.
B. Report of City Attorney .
1. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 81-26, rezoning from Rural to Regional Comer.:
cial_Ser_vice_for_Kentlicky Fried Chicken (west of 1,169 $. south of Hardee's
by Del aria Kitchens and Developer's Agreement
City Council Minutes -7- December 15, 1981
City Attorney Pauly explained the change which had been made to
to the Developer's Agreement.
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to give 2nd Reading to
Ordinance No. 81-26, rezoning from Rural to Regional Commercial Service
for Kentucky Fried Chicken by Delaria Kitchens. Motion carried unani-
mously.
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Developer's
Agreement. Motion carried unanimously.
2. Final plat approval for Eden Glen 2nd Addition Delaria's Kentucky Fried
Chicken ckesolution No. 81-24T
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Penzel, to adopt Resolution No. 81-244,
approving final plat of Eden Glen 2nd Addition. Motion carried unanimously.
C. Report of City Manager
1. Architectural Services Contract with InterDesign, Inc.
City Manager Jullie discussed the draft agreement with InterDesign which
had been submitted to Council members prior to the meeting.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to approve the draft agree-
ment with InterDesign, Inc. for architectural services subject to review
by the City Attorney. Motion carried unanimously,
2. Newsletter Publication
City Manager Jullie said discussions had been underway regarding
publishing "Happenings", the City newsletter, in one of the local
newspapers. The Eden Prairie News,Prairie Register, and Eden Prairie
Pilot had been requested to submit proposals, Jullie recommended
the City accept the proposal submitted by the Prairie Register,
The decision to consider publishing "Happenings" as a part of the Prairie
Register on a trial basis, keeping the City's options open, was con-
tinued to the December 19, 1981, special meeting of the City Council,
3. Employee Benefits
City Manager Jullie outlined recommendations for an employee benefit
package for 1982:
1. The City will reimburse dental expenses incurred during
1982 by a family unit (employees and the employees' depen-
dents) subject to the following limitations:
A. Eighty (802) of the first $200 in expenses will be re-
imbursed by the City within 30 days after receipt of
claims.
City Council Minutes -8- December 15, 1981
B. Payment by the City for orthodontics work will be
limited to 50% of the first $200. (Note: the life-
time limit for orthodontics is $1,000.)
C. The maximum annual payment under #A. and B. combined
is $160.
D. The Council has allocated $20,000 towards the plan
for 1982. There are 114 employees eligible to par-
ticipate. Any balances remaining in the fund as of
year end will be pro-rated to those family units having
claims in excess of $200. All claims for services incurred
during the year (January 1 - December 31) must be submitted
before 4/1;83. The pro-rated balances will be paid in May
igg3.
2. The City pays the premium of $7,500 term life insurance and
accidental death or dismemberment insurance for each employee.
(This had been $5,000 in 1981.)
3. One additional day of vacation will be added in 1982. This
will be taken as 4 hours on Christmas Eve and 4 hours on Good
Friday. Employees who must work at these times may use this
extra day as usual vacation time.
4. Two percent shall be added at each level to the amount of sever-
once pay paid to employees who leave the City in good standing.
(This is unused sick leave.)
5. The City will reimburse 100% of the employee expenses for
tuition fees and books required for job-related educational
courses upon completion of the course with grade "C" or better.
Books and equipment paid for by the City shall remain the City's
property. All courses to be approved by Department Head and
City Manager.
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Employee
Benefit Package for 1982 as shown above. Roll call vote: Bentley,
Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unani-
mously.
4. Transportation Advisory Board
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to nominate Dean Edstrom
for appointment to the Transportation Advisory Board of the Metropolitan
Council. Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes -9- December 15, 1981
D. Report of Director of Public Works
1. Receive feasibility reports for Schooner Blvd. and related improvements
and set Public Hearing for January 1982, at 7:30 p.m., 1.C.'s 340A,
51-340B, 51-308C and 51-335 (Resolution No. 81-253T
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to adopt Resolution No. 81-253,
receiving feasibility report and calling for a hearing for Schooner Blvd.
Motion carried unanimously.
X. NEW BUSINESS
Burdell Wessells of the Eden Prairie Lion's Club presented a check to the City
for $5,000 which is for playground equipment at Round Lake Park. Mayor Penzel
accepted the check on behalf of the City and thanked the Lion's Club for their
continued support of City projects.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to adjourn the meeting at 9:56 p.
Motion carried unanimously.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
SATURDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1981
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL STAFF:
9:00 AM, CITY HALL
Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, George Bentley, Dean
Edstrom, Paul Redpath and George Tangen
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City Attorney Roger
Pauly, and Finance Director John D. Frane
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER IT:MS OF BUSINESS
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to approve the Agenda as published.
Motion carried unanimously.
II. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Request for Municipal _Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $1,000,000.00
for Sorem & Sherman—TResolution No. 81-242)
William Sherman of Excel Marketing indicated to the Council that he and L.S.
Sorem would own the building and lease it to L. S. Sorem and Associates and
Excel Marketing and their warehouse company. The building, located next to
Crown Auto office warehouse in Edenvale, would be 40,000 square feet; employ-
ment would be about 98 people. He described the business operations of each
of the firms.
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Bentley, to close the Public Hearing and
adopt Resolution 81-242. Motion carried unanimously.
III. NEWSLETTER PUBLICATION
The Council instructed the City Manager to request the Eden Prairie News to submit
a quotation to publish the Happenings.
IV. RESOLUTION NO. 81-254, AMENDING THE 1981 BUDGET
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Edstrom, to adopt Resolution No. 81-254, amending
the 1981 Budget. Motion carried unanimously.
V. DISCUSSION ON CODIFICATION
The Council continued its discussion on codification of City codes.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
The Council set its January 5, 1982, meeting to begin at 6:00 p.m. with a tour of
the Community Center.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to adjourn the meeting at 12 o'clock
noon. Motion carried unanimously.
10
January 5, 1982
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
DATE: December 29, 1981
SUBJECT: Joint Use Rental Agreement No. 438
MWCC
The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has requested the City's renewal
of the Joint Use Rental Agreement No. 438. This agreement covers the DL-1
trunk sanitary sewer in the northwestern corner of Eden Prairie which
serves portions of the City of Chanhassen. The renewal period is for the
calendar year 1982.
Recemmend approval of the attached Statement of Agreement.
EAD:sg
Attachment
we ITIPTPOiounq P1 DC.
71A POP(PT /MCl/
mini PAM ssioi
60 22241425
o; OLITfI)
U..1 R/TE
CO ill :•:OL
C01111i'llf/10f1 DEC 8 WA
November 13, 1981
,
Mr. Karl Jullie
City Manager
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
RE: JOINT USE RENTAL ^.GREEMENT FOR 1982
Dear Mr. Jullie:
In accordance with Section 4 of the Joint Use Rental Agreement
No. 438 between the City of Eden Prairie and the Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission, such contract can be renewed by consent
of both parties.
We wish to renew for another year the Joint Use Rental Agreement
No. 438 under the same terms and conditions contained in the agreement
which is presently in force between the City of Eden Prairie and the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission.
The Renewal Agreement is enclosed in triplicate for your endorsement.
We have signed the enclosed statement as our intention of renewing
the agreement and ask that you also sign and return to us two (2)
of the executed copies and retain one (1) for your records. Should
you have any questions or suggested changes to the basic contract
agreement, please contact us.
Your cooperation in accepting this renewal procedure is greatly
appreciated.
Very trul,;e, 7lacr
George W. Lusher
Chief Administrator
GWL:LRB:ht
Enclosures
cc: LaRae Bohn, Accounting Supervisor
Wilbur A. Blain, Director of Operations
Rick Arbour, Interceptor Manager
George W. Lusher, Chief Administrator
DEC B 19.81
Dated
•"•••
STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT RENEWAL
JOINT USE RENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 438
The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and the City of Eden Prairie
agree to renew the Joint Use Rental Agreement No. 438 under the same term
s
and conditions contained in the agreement which is currently in force be-
tween these parties. The Renewal period for Joint Use Rental Agreement N
o
.
438 shall be January 1, 1982 - December 31, 1982.
That both parties agree to the renewal period and terms is evidenced
by the signatures affixed to this statement.
FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE THE METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION
t c-- /
(TITLE)
SaliS-UiTry Adams, Ch a irman
D ITLIT
Dated
January 5, 1982
CITY or EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 82-13
RESOLUTION RECEIVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE/CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN
RAILROAD/MN DDT FOR INSTALLATION OF SIGNALS
AT BIRCH ISLAND ROAD CROSSING
I.C. 51-402, Railroad Crossing Birch Island Road
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Eden Prairie enter into an
Agreement with the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company
and the Commissioner of Transportation for the installation and maintenance
of railroad crossing signals at the intersection of Birch Island Road with
the tracks of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company in
Eden Prairie, Minnesota and appointing the Commissioner of Transportation
agent for the City to supervise said project and administer available Federal
Funds in accordance with Minnesota Statute, Section 161.36 (1980). The
City of Eden Prairie's share of the cost shall be 10 percent of the total cost.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Clerk be and they
are hereby authorized to execute said agreement for and on behalf of the City
of Eden Prairie.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on January 5, 1982.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, City Clerk
12-
NO ti "ir,,
Ill 11t'l1 of Transportation
tE Transportation Minding
st. Minnesota 55155
Or TS.NO
December 16, 1981
612-296-0358
Phone
Eugene Dietz
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55343
In reply refer to: 730
S.P. 27 -00159
Grade Crossing Signals
Birch Island Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul
and Pacific Railroad Company
Agreement No. 60W45
File: F-13144
Dear Mr. Dietz:
Ynclosed are four copies of an ..eement which provides for
the inst%llution of railroad grade crossing signals at
Birch Island Pond in Eden Prairie. The City is to rarticipate
with 105 of the cost. 1lease have the a6..reement and the
resolutions signed and rcLurn all copies to this office for
further processing.
One fully executed copy will be sent to you.
Sincerely,
Robert C. Swanson
Manager, Railroad Operations
EA 0 zz,
By: E. B. O'Neill
Enclosure:
Agreement No. 60 1045 (4 copies)
Rai:En:pat
AnEqualOppodunityEmployer
AGREEMENT NO. 60445
DATED:
S.P. 27-00159
Minn. Proj. RRS RI1P-0025(8)
Railroad Crossing Signals
Birch Island Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
HENNEPIN COUNTY
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL
PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
AGENCY FUNDS
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,
hereinafter called the "City", RICHARD B. OGILVIE, AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, DEBTOR, hereinafter
called the "Company", and the COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE OF MINNESOTA,
hereinafter called the "State", WITNESSETH:.
WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration, when acting in cooperation
with the Transportation Department of the State of Minnesota, is authorized by
Act of Congress to make Federal Aid available for the purpose of eliminating
hazards at railroad grade crossings within the State of Minner,ota; and
WHEREAS, the State, pursunpt to Minnesota Statute,.Section 161.36 (1980),
is authorized to cooperate with the United States Government in supervising
improvements of public highways within the State of Minnesota not included in
the trunk highway system, and to act in disbursing and accounting for Federal
Funds in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, Birch Island Road, as now established, crosses the track of the
Company at grade in Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesota, the location of
said crossing and railway tsack being shown on the print hereto attached,
marked Exhibit "B", and herein referred to and made a part of this agreement;
and
WHEREAS, the City and the Company desire that this grade crossing be
protected by railroad crossing signals, flashing Ii gut with gates type, and
AGREEMENT NO. 60445 '
the Company is willing to install, maintain and operate such signals upon the
terms and conditions hereinafter stated.
NOW, THEN, IT IS AGREED:
1. The State of Minnesotit, Department of Transportation, "Standard
Clauses for Railway Highway Agreements", dated September 1, 1980, is attached
hereto as Exhibit "A", and hereinafter referred to as "Standard Clauses".
Except as hereinafter expressly modified, all of the terms and conditions set
forth in the "Standard Clauses" are hereby incorporated by reference and made
a part of this agreement with the same force and effect as though fully set
forth therein.
Standard Clauses Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, S, 8a, 10 and 11 are deleted from this
agreement.
. 2. The Company shall furnish all material for and with its regularly
employed forces install a complete railroad crossing signal system on Birch
Island Road, as indicated on attached plan marked Exhibit "B". The placement
of the signals shall be in accordance with Part VIII of the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Detailed plans, specifications and the work
to be done shall be subject to the approval of the Department of Transportation
of the State of Minnesota.
Work of installing this signal system shall be prosecuted so as to be
completed within 32 months after the date the Company is authorized to begin
work.
If the Company shall determine it impossible to complete the work within
the period herein specified, it shall make a written request to the State for
an extension of time for completion, Setting forth therein the reason for such
extension.
Portion of costs allocated to
City of Eden Prairie (10% of
actual cost.)
Reimbursable with
Federal Funds
$ 0,820.00
$61,380.00
(9
-3-
120
AGREEMENT NO. 60445 •
r•le
3. The actual costs of the project herein contemplated, including pre-
liminary engineering costs, are to be financed with 90% Federal Funds and 10%
City Funds. The State and City will reimburse the Company as provided herein
for only such items of work and expense as are proper and eligible for payment
with Federal Funds. Only materials actually incorporated into the project
will be eligible for Federal reimbursement.
The State's 90% portion (reimbursable with Federal Funds) will be paid to
the Company in accordance with Article 9 of the Standard Clauses, Exhibit "A".
The City's 10% portion will be paid to the Company when the project has
been completed and the Final Bill has been approved by the State.
It is understood that the following estimate is for informational purposes
only. The estimated cost of the work to be done by the Company hereunder with
its own equipment and regularly employed forces and in accordance with the
Company's agreements with such regularly employed forces is as follows and in
further accordance with detailed estimate attached hereto and marked Exhibit
"C".
Material
$34,628.00
Labor (Including Additives $27,396.00
Contingencies $ 0,176.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST
$68,200.00
AGREEMENT NO. 60445
4. In the event it is determined that a change from the foregoing
statement of work to be performed by the Company is required, it Shall be
authorized only by a written change or extra work order issued by the State
prior to the performance of the work involved in the change.
5. The said grade crossing signal system shall be maintained and operated
by the Company upon completion of its installation, but this said obligation
to maintain said signal system shall continue in accordance with the law of
the State as it shall be from time to time in the future.
6. The signal system shall not be removed unless there has been a
determination that said signals are no longer required at this location. If
the signals are to be removed, the Company upon request of the State shall
reinstall it at some other crossing within the State on the Company's tracks.
The location and division of cost of such relocation shall he agreed upon
between the Company and the State prior to such removal.
In the event that either railway or highway improvements will necessitate
a rearrangement of the signals at said crossing, the party whose improvement
causes said changes will bear the entire cost of the same without obligation
to the other.
7. This agreement is binding on Richard B. Ogilvie, not as an individual,
but solely in his capacity as Trustee.
.4,. I2E
January 5, 1982
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
DATE: December 30, 1981
SUBJECT: Safety Improvements to T.H. 169
The Mn/Dot has developed plans and specifications for safety improvements
along T.H. 169 from our West Corporate limits to approximately Flying Cloud
Airport. The improvements generally consist of extending culverts to
eliminate ditch obstructions which cause a severe safety hazard in an
accident situation.
There is no cost to the City of Eden Prairie for the project, but Mn/Dot does
request our approval. I recomnend approval of the attached resolution.
EAD:sg
Attachment
January 5, 1982
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 82-14
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLAN FOR SAFETY
PROJECTS BY MN DOT WITHIN TH 169 RIGHT-
OF-WAY (CHANHASSEN TO FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT)
WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation for the State of
Minnesota has prepared: plans, special provisions, and specifications for
the improvement of Trunk Highway No. 5, renumbered as Trunk Highway No. 169,
within the corporate limits of the City of Eden Prairie, from the West
Corp. limits to Flying Cloud Airport and seeks approval thereof:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
That said plans and special-provisions for the improvement of
said Trunk Highway within said corporate limits of the City, be and hereby
approved including the elevations and grades as shown and consent is hereby
given to any and all changes in grade occasioned by said construction.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City does hereby agree to require
the parking of all vehicles, if such parking is permitted within the corporate
limits of said City, on said Trunk Highway, to be parallel with the curb
adjacent to the highway, and at least 20 feet from any crosswalks on all
public streets intersecting said trunk highway. •
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on January 5, 1982.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
January 5, 1982
CITY or EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 82-15
RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT
AND CALLING FOR A HEARING I.C. 52-010
WHEREAS, a report has been given by the City Engin
e
e
r
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Council on 'January 5, 1982, recommending the following improvements to wit:
I.C. 52-010, Mitchell Road/McCes Drive
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE
C
I
T
Y
C
O
U
N
C
I
L
:
1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvemen
t
s
i
n
accordance with the report and the assessment of pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
abutting or within said boundaries for all or a por
t
i
o
n
of the cost of the improvement pursuant to M.S.A. S
e
c
t
.
420-011 to 429.111, at an estimated total cost of t
h
e
improvements as shown.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed impr
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
on the 2nd day of February, 1982, at 7:30 P.M. at the
Eden Prairie City Hall. The City Clerk shall give p
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
and mailed notice of such hearing on the improveme
n
t
s
a
s
required by law.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on Janua
r
y
5
,
1
9
8
2
.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
JANUARY 1982
/47(
+
et--/ /1,2e.....44LAMING / IAANSPOR A TION / ENGWEERM I. ARCHTECTUIE
City of _Eden Prairie
F-E -ASaUTY
j-ILITY and
0 IMPR9VEMENT
r - --1 McQES DRIVE
(Wallace Roaql-A-3 Schoone
I.C. 52-010A thliji 527:910
1
r -
STIQ -ET,
MITCHELL ROAD
(Scenic Heights Road to T.
LC. 52-010E
/6-
Mid-Am. Homes
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Ordinance No. 81-22
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 135
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended as follows: The
following described property, situated in the County of Hennepin, State of
Minnesota,
See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
shall be and hereby is removed from the
Rural
District
and shall be included hereafter in the
Office District.
Section 2. The above described property shall be subject to the terms
and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of
1981 between MID-AMERICA HOMES, INC. and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, which
Agreement is hereby made a part hereof and shall further be subject to
all of the ordinances, rules and regulations of the City of Eden Prairie
according to the Office District.
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Eden Prairie on the 6th day of October, 1981, and finally read and adopted
and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on
day of
1981.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Tan D. Frane, City Clerk
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of • 1981,
••`,
MID-AMERICAN HOMES ADDITION OFFICE
That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section
15, Township 116 North, Range 22, West of the 5th Principal Meridian,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point
in the North line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter
distant 916.70 feet Fast of the Northwest corner thereof; thence con-
tinuing East along said North line 290.00 feet; thence South 10 degrees
West 158.75 feet more or less to a point in the Northerly line of Trunk
Highway No. 5; thence Northweste ,ly along said Northerly line of said
Highway, 288.00 feet more or less to a point in a line bearing South
10 degrees West from the point of beginning; thence North 10 degrees
East 68.81 feet more or less to the point of beginning. For the pur-
pose of this description the North line of said Section 15 is considered
to be an assumed bearing of East.
EXHIBIT A
/6
Mid-Am. Homes Office
10/81
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of
, 1981
by and between MID-AMERICAN HOMES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, herein-
after referred to as "Owner" and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City",
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Owner has applied to City to rezone from Rural to Office
approximately 2.2 acres, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota,
more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof
and hereafter referred to as "the property", and
WHEREAS, Owner desires to develop the property for the construction
thereon of two office structures each containing 12,200 square feet of space.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. •
81-22, and Resolution No. 81-202, Owner covenants and agrees to construction
upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows:
1. Owner shall plat and develop the property in conformance
with the material dated 9/25/81 reviewed and approved by
the City Council on 10/6/81 and attached hereto as Exhibit
B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided
herein. Owner shall not develop, construct upon or maintain
the property in any other respect or manner than provided
herein.
2. Owner covenants and agrees to the performance and observance
by Owner at such times and in such manner as provided therein
of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions
set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part thereof.
Developer's Agreement-Mid-Am. Homes Inc. Office
page 2
3. Owner shall, inmediately upon filing of the final plat
a
n
d
•
prior to issuance of any permit for building upon the pro
p
e
r
t
y
,
grant to City a preservation easement as may be required
b
y
C
i
t
y
,
prohibiting and restricting the grading or placing of soi
l
u
p
o
n
,
removal of soil, or cutting of vegetation, planting of an
y
i
n
-
digenous vegetation, or construction of any building or
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
upon that portion of the property by Owner depicted as O
u
t
l
o
t
A
outlined in red on Exhibit B, and containing such other
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
as may be required by City.
4. Owner shall screen all mechanical equipment in accordanc
e
w
i
t
h
specifications of City Building Inspector.
5. Owner shall limit any access from TH 5 to a right-in, ac
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
to specifications of the City Engineer, and shall cause
o
t
h
e
r
s
to so limit any access to TM 5.
6. Owner shall, prior to building permit issuance, submit
t
o
t
h
e
City, a detailed landscaping plan and obtain the City's
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
thereof. Such plan shall include but not be limited to:
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
of parking lot from the Purgatory Creek Valley and use of
p
l
a
n
t
material indigenous to the Purgatory Creek Valley.
7. Owner shall not alter the elevations of the parking lot
d
e
p
i
c
t
e
d
in Exhibit B.
8. Owner shall, prior to final plat, design the grades under
8
%
,
in the northwest end of the parking lot as depicted on Ex
h
i
b
i
t
B
and in accordance with specifications of the City Enginee
r
.
Developer's Agreement-Mid-Am. Homes Inc. Office page 3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have caus
e
d
these presents to be executed as of the day and year afores
a
i
d
.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
_by Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
by Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _day of
, 1981 by Wolfgang H. Penzel, the Mayor and Carl J.
Jullie, the City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a Minn
e
s
o
t
a
m
u
n
i
-
cipal corporation on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
MID-AMERICANHOMES, INC.:
,
by Kenneth• Nordling, President
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 7 ,day of
1981 by Kenneth Nordling, President of Mid-Americai
Homes, Inc., a Minnesota corporation on behalf of the corpora
t
i
o
n
.
19
MID-AMERICAN HOMES ADDITION OFFICE
That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section
15, Township 116 North, Range 22, West of the 5th Principal Meridian,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point
in the North line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter
distant 916.70 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof; thence con-
tinuing East along said North line 290.00 feet; thence South 10 degrees
West 158.75 feet more or less to a point in the Northerly line of Trunk
Highway No. 5; thence Northwestuly along said Northerly line of said
Highway, 288.00 feet more or less to a point in a line bearing South
10 degrees West from the point of beginning; thence North 10 degrees
East 68.81 feet more or less to the point of beginning. For the pur-
pose of this description the North line of said Section 15 is considered
to beanassumed bearing of East.
EXHIBIT A
20
,",-,
,
rif — n;,
1 \ '‘.
Z%--- • { 1 .• s•
DEVELOP .ER'S AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT
page I of 5
I. Prior to release of final plat, Owner shall submit to the City
Engineer for approval two copies of a development plan (1"=100' scale)
showing existing and proposed contours, proposed streets and lot
arrangement and size, minimum floor elevations on each lot, preliminary
alignment and grades for sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer,
100 year flood plain contours, pending areas, tributary areas to catch
basins, arrows showing direction of storm water flow on all lots,
location of walks, trails and any property to be deeded to the City.
. II. Owner shall submit detailed construction and storm sewer
plans to the Riley Purgatory Creek
Watershed District for review and approval.
Owner shall follow all rules and recommendations of said
Watershed District.
Owner shall pay cash park fees as to all of the property required
by any ordinance in effect as of the date of the issuance of eac)i.
building permit for construction on the property. Presently,
the amount of cash park fee applicable to the property is
$1,400 per acre. The amount to be paid by Owner shall be increased
or decreased to the extent that City ordinances are amended or
supplemented to require a greater or lesser amount as of the date
of the issuance of any building permit for construction on the
property.
IV. Prior to the dedication, transfer or conveyance of any real
property or interest therein to the City as provided herein,
Owner shall deliver to the City an opinion addressed to the
City by an Attorney, and in a form , acceptable to City, as to
. the condition of the title of such property or in lieu of a
title opinion, a title insurance policy insuring the condition
of the property or interest therein in the City. The condition of
the title of any real property or any interest therein to be
dedicated, transferred or conveyed as may be provided herein by
Owner to City shall vest in City good and marketable title,
therein free and clear of any mortgages, liens, encumbrances,
or assessments.
- 1/80
.Page 2 Of 5 Exhibit C
V. -A.':111 sanitary sewer, watenuain and storm sewer facilities,
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
c
u
r
b
,
gutters,sidewalks,streets and other public utilities (
"
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
"
)
to be made and constructed on or within the property an
d
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to the City shall be designed in compliance with City s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
b
y
a registered professional engineer and submitted to th
e
C
i
t
y
E
n
g
i
n
-
eer for approval. All of the improvements shall be com
p
l
e
t
e
d
b
y
•
Owner & acceptable to the City Engineer and shall be fr
e
e
a
n
d
c
l
e
a
r
of any lien, claim, charge or encumbrance, including an
y
f
o
r
w
o
r
k
,
labor or services rendered in connection therewith or m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
or
equipment supplied therefore on or before the later of
,
2
y
e
a
r
s
from the date hereof or , 19. Upon com-
pletion and acceptance, Owner warrants and guarantees
t
h
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
-
ments against any defect in materials or workmanship f
o
r
a
p
e
r
i
o
d
of two (2) years following said completion and accept
a
n
c
e
.
In
the event of any defect in materials or workmanship wi
t
h
i
n
s
a
i
d
2 year period warranty and guarantee shall be for a peri
o
d
o
f
t
h
r
e
e
(3) years following said completion and acceptance. Def
e
c
t
s
in
material or workmanship shall be determined by the City
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
.
Acceptance of improvements by the City Engineer may be
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
such conditions as he may impose at the time of accepta
n
c
e
.
O
w
n
e
r
,
through his engineer, shall provide for competent daily
i
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
during the construction of all improvements. As-built d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
with service and valve ties on reproduceable mylar shall
b
e
d
e
l
i
v
e
r
-
ed to the City Engineer within 60 days of completion the
r
e
o
f
t
o
-
gether with a written statement from a registered engin
e
e
r
t
h
a
t
all
improvements have been completed, inspected and tested
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
with City-approved plans and specifications. Prior to f
i
n
a
l
p
l
a
t
approval, or issuance of any building permit, if no fin
a
l
p
l
a
t
i
s
required, Owner shall:
Submit a bond or letter of credit which guarantees com-
pletion of all improvements within the times provided,
upon the conditions, and in accordance with the terms
of this subparagraph V. A., including but not limited
to, a guarantee against defects in materials or work-
manship for a period of two (2) years following com-
pletion and acceptance of the improvements by the City
Engineer. The amount of the bond or letter of credit
shall be 125% of the estimated construction cost of
said improvements, subject to reduction thereof to an
amount equal to 25", of the cost of the improvements
after acceptance thereof by the City Engineer, and re-
ceipt of as-built drawings. The bond or letter of
credit shall be in such form and contain such other
provisions and terms as may be required by the City
Engineer. The Owner's registered engineer shall make'
and submit for approval to the City Engineer a written
estimate of the costs of the improvements.
B, In lieu of the obligation imposed by subparagraph V.A. a
b
o
v
e
,
O
w
n
e
r
may submit a 100% petition signed by all owners of the
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
,
re-
questing the City to install the improvements. Upon approval by
the
City Council, the City may cause said improvements to be ma
d
e
a
n
d
special assessments for all costs for said improvements will be
levied on the property, except any property which is or sha
l
l
b
e
d
e
d
-
.
1/80
6/81
.page 3 of 5 Exhibit C
icated to the public, over a five year period. Prior to the award
of any contract by the City for the construction of any improve-
. nlents, Owner shall have entered into a contract for rough grading
of streets included in the improvements to a finished subgrade
elevation. Contractor's obligation with respect to the rough
grading v.ork shall be secured by a bond or letter of credit which
shall guarantee completion, and payment for all labor and mater-
ials expended in connection with the rough grading. The amount
of the bond or letter of credit shall be 125 of the cost of such
rough grading and shall be in such form and contain such further
terms as may be required by the City Engineer. '
C. Prior to release of final plat, Owner shall pay to City fees for
first 3 year street lighting (public streets) engineering re-
view and street signs.
VI. A. Owner shall remove all soil ., and debris from, and clean, all streets
within, the property at least every two months, (or within one week
Irma the date of any request by City), during the period commencing
May 1 and ending October 31, of each year, until such time as such
streets and improvea2nts therein are accepted for ownership and
maintenance by City.
Prior to City accepting streets and improvements, Owner shall have
restored all boulevards according to the obligations contained
within paragraph VI B.
B. Within 20 days of installation of utilities and street curb in any
portion of the property (if said time occurs between May 1 and
October 31 of any year) Owner shall sod (secured with a minimum of
2 stakes per roll of sod) that part of the property lying between
said curb and a line 18+ inches measured perpendicular with the
curb or in lieu of said sod, place a fiber blanket With seed ap- •
proved by the City (secured with stakes a maximum of 6 feet apart).
Either sod or fiber must be placed upon a minimum of 4 inches of
topsoil. The topsoil shall be level with the top of the curb at the
curb line and rise 1 )' for each foot from the curb line. •
Owner shall maintain the sod, fiber blanket, topsoil, and grade
until such time as the streets and improvements in the property are
accepted for ownership and maintenance by City.
Owner shall also sod all drainage swales serving each 1.5 acres a
minimum distance of 6 feet on either side of the center of the
swale.
C. The bond or letter of credit provided in paragraph V A. hereof
shall also guarantee the performance of Owner's obligations under
this paragraph VI.
• VII. If Owner fails to proceed in accordance with this Agreement within 24 .
months of the date hereof, Owner for itself, its successors, and assigns
hall nnt nimne rezoning of said property to Rural. 2q
•6/81
Rage 4 Of 5 Exhibit C
VIII. •Provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against
Owner, its successors, and assigns of the property herein desdribed.
IX. Owner represents and warrants it owns fee title to the property free
and clear of motgages,,liens, and other . encumbrances, except:
' X. In the event there are or will be constructed on the property, 2 or more
streets, and if permanent street signs have not been installed, Owner
shall install temporary street signs in accordance with recommendations
of the City Building Department, prior to the issuance of any permit to
build upon the property.
XI. All improvements including grading, seeding, planting, landscaping,
equiping, and 'constructing of any structure to or upon any of the
property or other lands to be conveyed or dedicated to the City or
for which an easement is to be given to the City for park or other
recreational purposes, shall be completed by Owner and acceptance to
the Director of Community Services and shall be free and clear of any
lien, claim, change, or encumbrance, including any for work, labor, or .
services rendered in connection therewith or material or equipment sup-
plied therefore on or before the later of, 2 years from the date hereof
or , Upon completion and acceptance Owner
warrants and guarantees the improvements against any defect in materials
or workmanship for a period of two (2) years following said completion .
and acceptance. In the event of any defect in materials or workManship
within said 2 year period the warranty and guarantee shall be for a
period of three (3) yeals following said completion and acceptance.
determined Defects in materials or workmanship shall be rl I I ed by the Director
of Comaunity Services. Acceptance of improvements by the Director of
Comnunity Services may be subject to such obligations as he may impose
at the time of acceptance. Owner, through his engineer shall provide
for competent daily inspection during the construction of all improve-
ments. Prior to final plat approval, or issuance of any building permit,
if no final plat is required, Owner shall:
Submit a bond or letter of credit which guarantees com-
pletion of all improvements within the times provided,
upon the conditions, and in accordance with the terms
of this paragraph XI., including but not limited
to, a guarantee against defects in materials or workman-
ship for a period of two (2) years following comple-
tion and the extension of the pet'iod to three (3) years
in the event of any defect during said 2 year period,
and acceptance of the improvements by the Director of
Community Services shall be 125% of the estimated con-
struction cost of said improvements, subject to reduction
thereof to an amount equal to 25% of the cost of the
improvements after acceptance thereof by the Director
of Community Services. The bond or letter of credit
shall be in such form and contain such other provisions
and terms as may be required by the Director of Com-
munity Services. The Owner's registered engineer shall
make and submit for approval to the Director of Commun-
ity Services a written estimate of the costs of the
improvements. •
1/80
9/10/80
Pa.ge 5 of 5 Exhibit C
XII. Owner acknowledges that the rights of City to performanc
e
o
f
o
b
l
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
of owner contemplated in this agreement are special, unique
a
n
d
o
f
a
n
extraordinary character; and that in the event that owner
v
i
o
l
a
t
e
s
o
r
fails or refuses to perform any covenant, condition or p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
m
a
d
e
b
y
him herein, City may be without an adequate remedy at la
w
.
O
w
n
e
r
a
g
r
e
e
s
,
therefore, that in the event he violates, fails or refus
e
s
t
o
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
y
covenant, condition or provision made herein, City may,
a
t
i
t
s
o
p
t
i
o
n
,
institute and prosecute an action to specifically enforc
e
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
o
f
such covenant : Ho remedy conferred in this agreement is intended to b
e
exclusive and each shall he cumulative and shall be in a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
t
o
e
v
e
r
y
other remedy. The election or any one or more remedies
s
h
a
l
l
n
o
t
c
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
a waiver of any other remedy.
XIII. Any term of this agreement that is illegal or unenforce
a
b
l
e
a
t
l
a
w
o
r
i
n
.
equity shall be deemed to be void and of no force.and ef
f
e
c
t
t
o
t
h
e
e
x
t
e
n
t
necessary to bring such term within the provisions of
a
n
y
s
u
c
h
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
•
law or laws, and such terms as so modified and the bala
n
c
e
o
f
t
h
e
t
e
r
m
s
of this agreement shall be fully enforceable.
XIV. Owner shall, prior to the commencement of any improvement
s
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
written notite to Minnesota CablesYstems Southwest, a Min
n
e
s
o
t
a
L
i
m
i
t
e
d
Partnership, the franchisee under the City's. Cable Commu
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
Ordinance (80-33) of the development contemplated by this
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
'
s
Agreement. Notice shall be sent to Minnesota Cablesystem
s
S
o
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
*c/o Popham, Haik, Kaufman, Schnobrich and Doty, Ltd.,
4
3
4
4
I
D
S
C
e
n
t
e
r
,
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402.
CITY OF BEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
January 5, 1982
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.)
3.2 BEER OFF-SALE
Benson-Orth Associates
Knutson Construction Co.
D. J. Kranz Co., Inc.
Mattson Building & Supply Co.
Ram Construction
CON1RACTOR h 2 FAMILY 1
Barron & Associates, Inc.
George R. Butler Construction
David W. Durst & James Gans
Eliason Builders, Inc.
Hirsch Brothers, Inc.
Hogar Construction
Jarip Builders
Robert H. Mason, Inc.
Sawhorse, Inc.
HEATING & VENTILATING
Allied Metal Craft Co.
Climate Engineering Co.
Northeast Sheet Metal
Rouse Mechanical
Royalton Heating & Cooling Co.
SBS Mechanical, Inc.
Standard Heating & Air Cond.
GAS FITTER
Climate Engineering Co.
Northeast Sheet Metal
Rouse Mechanical
Royalton Heating & Cooling Co.
Standard Heating & Air Cond.
WELL DRILLING
Max Renner Well Co., Inc.
REFUSE & GARBAGE COLLECTION
Eden Prairie Sanitation
Jacobson Sanitary Service
Eden Prairie Grocery
Jerry's Super Valu
Worrell's Valley Dairy
3.2 BEER ON-SALE
Jerry's Super Valu
CIGARETTES
Country Kitchen
Eden Prairie Grocery
Griswold Vending Co.
Jerry's Super Valu
Twin City Vending
Worrell's Valley Dairy
VENDING MACHINE
Griswold Vending Co.
Interstate United Corporation
Twin City Vending
SUPERMARKET
Jerry's Foods
BAKERY . .
Jerry's Foods
Meat Dept.
Jerry's Foods
CANDY OUTLET
Fannie May Candy Shops
Jerry's foods
MECHANICAL GAMES
Twin City Novelty Co.
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible
fo-,1
(r.
.he licensed activity.
n / A '
Pat So
t
e, Licensing Clerk '71
Staff requests the Council to set February 2, 1982 for the public
hearing. The City Forester will supply a complete list of property
owners, tree numbers and estimated cost for removal at the public
hearing.
SAF:md
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
Stuart A. Fox, City Forester
December 28, 1981
Request for a Public Hearing on February 2, 1982 for
the Removal of Diseased Trees from Private Property
As of December 11, 1981 many of the diseased trees marked in the
summer of 1981 by tree inspectors are still standing. These trees
arc on private property and require a public hearing according to
Ordinance 1177-30 for their removal.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Carl Jullic, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: December 29, 1982
SUBJECT: Community Center Change Order
Attached to this memo is a letter dated December 28 from Pete Curley, Smiley
Glotter Associates, explaining several credits for the Eden Prairie Community
Center regarding floor covering and ceiling treatment within the Community
Center. The Council may recall that early this summer staff recommended.
deleting the exposed aggregate in the Community Center lobby and delayed making
a decision on the type of floor covering until a later date. Staff also
recommended deleting the VAT in the fitness center and carpeting that area.
After reviewing our programs and consulting with a number of other facilities
with similar programs in regards to traffic within the lobby, staff has decided
to recommend carpeting that area with a heavy duty industrial carpet.
Staff waited until this time to request approval, as we were able to obtain a
substantial reduction in costs for carpeting by obtaining our own quotes rather
than going through the architect and the general and subcontractors on the job.
Therefore, this contract for carpeting will be outside the project contract.
City staff received the following quotes for 345 square yards of carpet delivered
and installed in the lobby and fitness center.
Pink Supply - $17.52/sq. yd. total cost $6,044
Minneapolis Building Supply - $17.40/sq. yd. total cost $6,003
Neill Meyer Interiors - $18.73/sq. yd. total cost $6,461
Joe Marr - $17.98/sq. yd. total cost $6,203
Staff requests approval of the low bid of $6,003 by Minneapolis Building
Supply. Upon approval by the City Council, staff will attempt to have
this carpeting installed prior to the February 1 opening date.
2 9
Sincerely,
SMILEY CLOTTER ASSOrTATES
7 /)
E. R. Curley
ERC:eh
Anwoclalos
5011 L.Sidle
Minneapolis, Willies°la 55403
S111332.1401
Architects
Engineers
Planners
Interior Detainer;
S.C. Smiley, PAIS,
Glories A.I.A.
N.Y. Lalderman,
GA. Nyberg, A.I.A,
D=Mber 28, 1981
Mr. Robert Lambert
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Re: Eden Prairie Community Center
Comm. No. 8002
Dear Mr. Lambert:
As per your telephone request of December 22, 1981, regarding
list of credits we are holding for various items that have
been deleted during the course of the job, the following list
is submitted for your review.
1. Delete exposed aggregate per Magney letter
dated August 4, 1981 - $678.00 credit
2. Delete VAT floor per Magney letter dated
August 4, 1981 - $660.00 credit
3. Delete ceiling treatment in rooms 203 &
204 per telephone quote from Magney Construction
on December 22, 1981 - $480.00 credit
TOTAL $1,818.00 credit
You have also requested the addition of some VAT floor in some
areas of First Floor per Revised drawing R-11 dated December
22, 1981. The cost of this additional VAT per telephone . quote
from Magney Construction on December 28, 1981, is $575.00. If
this cost for additional VAT is deducted from total credit, the
balance of credit due under the contract would be $1,243.00.
Please review these items and advise when they are approved so
that the proper change order may be processed.
If you have any questions or ru,ed additional information, please
call.
Parks Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission Minutes
Unapproved
• -1- December 21, 1981
MEMBERS ABSENT: Breitenstein, Schwartz
b. IVoodlawn Heights
Gregg Frank of McCombs Knutson was present representing the
proponent, Lyman Lumber Company.
The developvis requesting PUD Development stage approval and
rezoning from Rural to R1 3.5 and PM 6.5 and preliminary plat
approval. The property is located South of Townline Road and
West of Duck Lake Road.
Frank said the developer is willing to provide access to the
park if the park is going to be developed early into Phase I
of construction. Lambert projected that the park will only be
graded at the time of proposed Phase I.
jessen suggested taking out 3 of the lots that jilt out into the
park area. He said the park would flow better and the additional
front footage costs the City would have to pay for the lots might
be a worthwhile investment in the park.
Lambert noted that the Planning Commission recommended removal
of 2 lots across the street from the townhouses because it would
be undesireable to have single family looking into multiple use.
MOTION: Jessen moved to recommend support of the proposal and
recommends approval with the following stipulations; Disagreement
with Planning Commission and recommends leaving 2 lots south of
the townhouses, and instead recommending deletion of 3 or 4 lots
along the park. Further, this may require adding 2 townhouses
or appropriate compensation elsewhere to be negotiated by the
City and the developer. Friederichs seconded the motion and it
carried unanimously.
3 1
Planning Commission Minutes
Unapproved
December 14, 1981
MEMBERS ABSENT: Beaman & Retterath
A. WOODLAWN HEIGHTS, by Lyman Lumber. Request for PUD Develop-
ment Plan approval, rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 and R1-13.5,
preliminary plat approval for 54 single family lots and 96
attached units, approval of an Environmental Assessment Work-
sheet and possible variances. Located in the southwest corner
of Townline Road and Duck Lake Trail. A continued public
hearing.
The Planner stated that this is a continued public hearing from the meeting of
11/23/81 which was cancelled. He stated that several months ago this project
was before the Commission as a POD Concept with rezoning and platting. The
proponent withdrew the rezoning and platting because of the density transfer.
The City Council reviewed the PUD and approved it with the recommendations of
the Planning Commission and Staff report. He stated that this is slightly
different from the original plan. He introduced !Greg Frank of McCombs-Knutson
which is representing Lyman Lumber.
Frank stated Jim Hurd of Lyman Lumber was also present. He reviewed the history
of the project and stated that thOi is proposed 54 single family units, and 96
4-unit townhomes for a total of 150 units. There is a 20 acre passive park and
an 8 acre active park proposed also. •
The Planner reviewdd the staff report dated 11/19/81. He stated that when the
original proposal was before the City Council, it was decided that if the County
does not take the responsibility for Townline Road, the City will under the
Capital Improvement Program.
Sutliff stated'Ehat no lot sizes are on the plat. The Planner replied that he
measured the lots to find out that there are some under 13,500 sq.ft.
Sutliff asked if a water level is established in the wetland area, if that can be
made an outlot so the water will not affect the lot sizes. The Planner replied
that the drainage and utility easement provides good control
Sutliff asked if any traffic will be travelling west. The Planner replied very
little and stated that the predominent direction is to the northeast.
Marhula asked if the proponent is agreeable with the change of the 2 lots becoming
another townhouse. Frank replied yes and stated that it will make the park slightly
smaller.
Marhula stated that he felt that the design of the temporary roadway is important.
He stated that it might be better to put the utilities in during phase 1 so that
in the future the temporary road could be imProved in the future. The Planner
stated that if the utilities were installed, it would require a lot of expenditure.
Frank stated that they agree with the 'throw-away road.
Torjesen asked if all landscaping is to be done in phase 1. The Planner replied
the landscaping adjacent to phase 1, berming to Minnetonka, and south to the single
family lots should all be done in phase 1.
Unapproved
Planning Commission Minutes -2- December 14, 1981
Torjesen asked if there will be any problems with giving up part of the 8 acre park
to accommodate the elimination of the 2 single family lots for an additional town-
house. The Planner stated that if the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
Commission is uncomfortable with that change, the 2 single family lots should be
retained.
Hallett asked how many a6 -es will be drained and how deep the water would be. The
Planner replied that the whole site would drain to the southwest and that it is
up to the DNR and WD to decide the depth of the outlet.
George Kissinger, 6601 Barberry Lane, stated he was representing the residents
that have signed a letter which he submitted. He expressed concern about the
active park, the cut and fill required, the housing units being predominantly
walk-out units, felt the area is valuable, the preservation of the wetland area,
and stated that these concerns are basically the same as when the PUD Concept
was being requested.
Torjesen asked what group he is representing. Kissinger replied on the west
side of the site in Sunset Trails Estates.
Ann Luck, 6381 Duck Lake Road, asked .what school district this development would
'be in. Torjesen replied he thought Eden Prairie.
Don Jacobsen, 6345 Duck Lake Road, stated he would like the*-swamp area left as
a nature park and have the building placed on the hill. He also stated he was
concerned with the low area and asked if it has been determined who is the owner
for the 20 acres which is proposed as the passive park. The Planner replied the
owner is the State but stated the developer has agreed to pay all back taxes and
encumbrances and then turn it over to the City. He stated that the City is asking
that the property remain in State ownership which would then ultimately be picked
up by the City with the developer paying all back taxes and encumbrances.
Torjesen stated that he felt that the points that the residents brought up are
important concerns.
Torjesen asked what more the Planning Commission can do and if all the retoMmend-
ations of the PUG Concept have been upheld. The Planner replied that the Commission
can make suggestions in terms of the park preservation. He stated that the active
park will have tennis courts, baseball fields, etc. while the passive park will be
a nature park Of woods. He stated that whether the parks are sWitched around, is
up to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission.
Jim Bast, 17440 W. 66th Street, stated he agreed with the concerns raised by
George Kissinger and stated he would like more trees preserved and felt that the
20 acres should not be given to the proponent for park dedication without a title.
Gartner stated .that she woOd like the words 'prior to any construction' added to #8
of the staff report between the wolicis 'dedicate' and 'free'.
Hallett stated he would like the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
to look closely at the active park, any chance of preserving more trees, and stated
that the developer should not be able to return in the future to request rezoning
for the single family lots. He would like them to remain single family lots.
33
Unapproved
Planning Commission Minutes
December 14, 1981
Sutliff asked if all the quadraminiums will have double car garages. The Planner
replied that the ordinance requires single garages, but the proponent is requesting
doubles.
MOTION 1
Mirhula moved to close the public hearing on the Woodlawn Heights preliminary plat.
Gartner seconded, motion carried 5-0.
MOTION 2
MrhuTanioved to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning from Rural
to R1-13.5 and RM 6.5 as per the material dated Oct., 1981 and the staff report
dated Nov. 19, 1981 with these modifications and/or additions: #5, add after the
word 'improvements', including sanitary sewer lift station force main as outlined
. . .; add #11 to read: Eliminate the 2 single family lots (Lots 26 and 27, Block
3) and substitute or add 1 additional townhome on Block 4. Sutliff seconded.
DISCUSSION
Haffai asked if the single fmaily will remain single family. Marhula replied yes.
AMENDMENT TO ADD TO MOTION
Gartner moved 6-ariro #8 of the, staff report between the words 'dedicate' and
'free', prior to any construction. Torjesen seconded, motion carried 4-1: Sutliff
voted no.
VOTE ON ORIGINAL MOTION AS AMENDED"'
Motion carried 5-0.
MOTION 3
1-7irliug moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat
dated 10/2/81 as per the staff report dated 11/19/81 with the same additions
and/or changes as listed in Motion 2. Hallett seconded.
DISCUSSION
Sutliff stated he felt that additions or changes should be made at this point
in the motions and stated he felt uncomfortable with the swale which has to be
filled.
AMENDMENT
moved that development in the swale be eliminated and plat be redesigned.
He also would like an outlet to be created for the water pending. Gartner
seconded.
DISCUSSION
Tlifietf asked what this would do to the project. The Planner replied that there
always was concern about the swale and stated that the natural resources will be
preserved as much as possible. He stated the swale is completely wooded but is
mostly boxelder trees.
Sutliff asked if all the frontages on the cul-de-sacs meet ordinance standards.
The Planner stated that they are all in excess of 55' which is reasonable.
Marhula stated that he did not agree with the elimination of lots and redesign
of the project away from the swale.
314
Unapproved
Planning Commission Minutes -4- December 14, 1981
VOTE ON AMENDMENT
Motion failed, 2-3. Marhula, Torjesen, and Hallett voted no.
Torjesen then stated that he felt that the information submitted by the neighbors
should be forwarded to the Council.
VOTE ON MOTION 3 WITHOUT AMENDMENT
Motion carried 3-2. Hallett and Gartner voted no.
MOTION 4
TiarhUla moved to refer to the City Council the Woodlawn Heights EAW Finding of
No Significant Inpact. Sutliff seconded, motion carried 5-0.
HEMOPANDUI4
TO: • Parks, Rocrci.iso and Natura/ Resources Commission
fR04: . Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE:
December 18, 1981
SUBJECT: Development Proposal Check List
PROIECT:
Woodlawn Heights
PROPONENT:
Lyman Lumber Co.
REQUEST: PUD pevelopment stage approval and rezoning from Rural to R1 3.5 and RM 6.5
ana-WiTrimilnary .)Ti approval-7— iocAtumSoutn or Townline Road and west of Duck Lake Road
BACKfROLIND: See Planning Staff Report Dated: November 19, 1981
'PARK AND RECREATION PLANNING CONCERNS
1. Type of development : Residential
2. Number of units in residential development:
54 single family units 6 96 quad units
3. Number of acres in the project: approximately 80 acres
4. Special recreation space requirements: 28 acres Of paik
S. adjacent to any existing or proposed parks: Adjacent to the Edengate floodplain open
anignMaibe Park: This 20 acres will add some active use space to serve
this new 4evelopme0t,,as well as some public QPET,sailaozipie areas for viewing
6. Keen tor a mini park . large loonn to sout h
No
7. Cash park fee or land dedication? Both
a. If Cash park fee dedication, amount based on existing ordinance will total: $41,500
b. If park land dedication, thc number of acres to be dedicated is 28 acres
c. Existing or pending assessments or taxes on proposed park property total Approx. $43,000
and will be paid prior to dedication.
B. Adjacent to existing or proposed trails: Sidewalk adjacent to Duck Lake Road
a. Type of trails Pedestrain
b. Construction Material Concrete
c. Width of trail 5 feet
d. Party responsible for construction Developer
O. Landownership of trail location:(dedicated, purchased. ROW) Row
NATURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION CONCERNS
I. Site grading plan considers natural amenities of the site? See Planning Staff Report — Page 2
2. Most significant grading on the site: Si gni ficant grading occurs along the south facing
slope toward the park area. Fxtensive grading is required in order to fill
the gully caused by years of erosion.
9 6,
S. Significant vegetation on the site Inc dcsihtrnthlst portion of the site is • ,enerally
wooded.'
4. The site grading plan indicates preset-vat ion of :N/A
S. Adjacent to public i..•aters: N/A
a. Affect on waters:
ItErriirscs CHECK
1. }la j or Center Area Study : N/A
2. Neighbolhood Facilities Study :he active use recreation facility proposed to be developed
on this site, as well as the laue open kpace area to the south and west will
adequately serve park needs for this area.
Purgatory Creek Study • N/A
4. Shoreland Management Ordinance:
N/A
S. Floodplain Oidinance This development proposal meets the floodplain ordinance
re_quiredsents.
6. Guide Plauj_.111C _1929_1; aid e _Mau_ dc.picS s this Ate.a._as low (10n 52L)' resi deatia.L.—
7. Other :
rircittTinATIONs
1. Adjacent neighborhood type, and any neighborhood opinion voiced in favor or opposed to the project:
2. Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planni Tic, Commission recommended approval of
rezoning and preliminary plat as per the material dated October 1981 and the
Staff Rs.port dated November 19, 1981. However, the Conmds .sion also recommended
to the 2 single family lots - Lot 26 & 27, 81 3 and sid)stitute or add s. Community Services Stall gccomendations: 1 ntidiqual toittlikagit„ on B1_4_, The Planning,
Commission also recommended that under No. 8 of the staff report between the
words dedicate and add "prior 6 any construction".
Com111911iTY51aNist a ff....11c cert,rmda t i ens • CO nnuai —Sem! i cc.% f acJauunciadS_____
approval as per the Planning Staff Report dated Nov. 19, 1981 and the Dec. 14
Planning Commission recommendations.
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Jean Johnson, Assistant Planner
Chris Linger, Director of Planning
November 19, 1981
WOODLAWN HEIGHTS
Lyman Lumber
1. PUD Development Stage Approval;
2. Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5
and RN 6.5;
3. Preliminary plat approval for
54 single family units, 96
quad units; 28 acres of park;
4. Environmental Impact Statement
finding of no significant impact.
BACKGROUND
Tbe City granted PUD Concept approval on August 18, 1981 for 150 resi;
&rit141 units on a gross area of approximately 80 acres.
Concerns raised during the PUD review were:
-ownership and density transfer of the 20 acre park;
-improvement assessments to abutting Duck Lake Road properties;
-access points to Townline Road and its improvement schedule;
-utility placement and capacity;
-grading was excessive and would eliminate the site's natural amenities
(ravine & woods);
-no lots should access to Duck Lake Road.
EXISTING SITE CHARACTER
The 60 parcel has sharp rolling wooded and grass covered
hills, and low wet areas. The 20 acre park parcel consists of floodplain
and a ridge of about 5 acres.
Vegetation types are elm, understory oak, basswood, a few large oaks, and
brush.
The wet area near Duck Lake Road is frequented by ducks and other wildlife.
Staff has requested additional information as to needed storm water capacity,
outlet elevations, and review and approval by Department of Natural Resources
(if necessary), prior to final platting of lots adjacent to this wet area.
Staff Report-Woodlawn Heights page 2
ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
The land area per multiple unit averages 10,000+ souare feet, well above the
minimum size of 6.500 SQ. ft.
The single family lots range in size from approximately 13,000-20,000 sq.
ft. Lots under 13,500 must be brought up to at least 13,500 sq. ft. in
size in the final plat.
The gross density of the project is 1.88 units/acre (79.99 acres & 150
units).
Grading
The grading for the northern eyebrow and cul-de-sac off of Duck Lake Road
require;cuts into small hillsides and involves tree removal. The placement
of homes will necessitate additional tree removal. The backyards' of the
eyebrow lots drop sharply to the wetland. Easements as required by the
City Engineering Department will be required across back and side lot lines
to allow access and maintenance of this wet area which will be utilized
for storm water purposes. These lots will be subject to conditi6ns out-
lined in the 'Existing Site Character section of this report.
Quad unit A, (see fig. 1) is depicted as having a drive access to Woodlawn
Heights across from 2 single family lots. Staff recommends that it be
redesigned to the cul-de-sac. Also, the sales potential of these 2 single
family lots facing quads would not be the best and it would be acceptable
to add a quad in the multiple if these 2 lots were dropped. This would
minimize needed grading and tree removal.
Any fill in this area and the southwest corner of the site will be subject
to review and any permits required by the Department of Natural Resources.
The staff will require documentation of the DNR's review prior to approval
of the final plat.
The ravine filling projected in the PUD has been reduced by eliminating a
short cul-de-sac off of Grand View Drive. Grand View Drive will require
10 1 ± cut and fill but does correspond better to the topo and vegetation
than the previous grading schematic.
Drainage
DraiTage of the 60 acres to be developed is to the south end of the
property into the vast Purgatory Creek floodplain. Detail utility plans
depicting volumes, capacity and elevations of ponds and outlets, catch
basins, etc., must be submitted prior to final plat submission for review
and approval by the City Engineering Department. Drainage along a natural
swab e off the northeast end of the site will be investigated by the project
engineer and the City Engineer.
Staff Report-Woodlawn Heights page 3
Preliminary engineering review indicates the need for the following:
-watermain connection to Chatham Way and Townline Road;
-construction of force main west to Purgatory Creek interceptor;
-drainage and utility easements along lot lines;
-relocation of storm sewer at the north end of quads (see fig. 1);
-inclusion of storm sewer system and possible relocation of utilities in
northern most cul-de-sac off of Duck Lake Road (see fig. 1).
Landscapina •
-Staff, after reviewing the preliminary site plan, sees the need for addi-
tional landscaping at:
-backyards of quads adjacent to the 8 acre active park;
-along Woodlawn Heights across from the single family;
-and the staff suggests berming along Townline Road at the time of initial
grading to screen the uses (see fig. 1).
All this work is recomnended to be done with phase 1 development.
TRANSPOR7 ATION
At the-l-ime OF review of the PUD, the County Highway Department requested a
50 foot ROW from Townline Road centerline and this is depicted upon the
preliminary plat.
With first phase development, Duck Lake Road will be extended north from
its present hard-surface terminous to a point approximately 190 feet north
of Woodlawn Heights.
Improvement of this portion of Duck Lake Road will include a 5 foot wide
sidewalk on both sides and corresponding utilities. Also, at time of first
phase grading, staff recomnends gravel surface improvement to Grand View
Drive from Woodlawn to the 8 acre park.
At time of second phase development, Duck Lake Road will be extended to
Townline with hard-surfacing, sidewalks, utilities, necessary cuts and fills,
etc.; and the city will work with Minnetonka to design and improve Townline
Road to a 28 foot wide hard-surface road.
A 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk is required along the west side of Woodlawn
Heights.
The Woodlawn Heights 60 acre development is served by 1 street from
Townline Road. Tieing a street from this development to the west would
not be required because: it would connect multiple to a possible single
family development, would entail tree and natural grade removal, and a new
City street serving 1, 2, or 3 of the large parcels to the west would meet
City street design standards and allow flexibility in their development.
At this time property owners to the west have not requested any connections.
The street naive 'Woodlawn Heights' does conflict with existing street names
and the developer should work with the City Engineering and Public Safety
Departments on a new submission.
LIO
Staff Report-Woodlawn Heights page 4
EAW
An EAW is reqUired and has been drafted for the City's review and ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
.
Cash Park re° '
During the POD review, the proponent agreed to:
1. Dedicate the 20 acre park to the southwest free and clear of taxes
assessments, and liens.
2. Dedicate an 8 acre active park and grade the park according to the
Community Services Director's recommendations.
3. Payment of the cash park fee.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the rezoning and platti
n
g
c
o
n
-
tingent upon the following:
1. Detail water design capacity and outlet to wet area and DNR review p
r
i
o
r
to platting of affected lots.
2. Single family lots under 13,500 sq. ft. must conform to Ord. 135 req
u
i
r
e
-
ments in final plat design.
3. Detail utility, outlet elevations, pipe size, capacity computations,
catch basins, etc., must be submitted to the City Engineer for review
and approval prior to approval of final plat.
4. Landscaping as outlined in this report must be done concurrent with
phase 1 development.
5. Developer agrees to participate in needed street and related improve-
ments outlined in this report; and to assume full cost of construction
of force main to creek interceptor.
6. Developer will work with City Engineering & Public Safety Departments
regarding street names.
7. Grading and utility plans will be subject to review and approval by
the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District.
8. Owner will dedicate free and clear of liens, taxes and assessments th
e
20 acre park and 8 acre park; and grade the 8 acre park to the Commun
i
t
y
Services Director's recommendations.
9. Project will be subject to cash park fee payment.
10. Owner will construct a 5' sidewalk along Duck Lake Road and 5' sidewa
l
k
along west side of Woodlawn Heights.
JJ:ss
sr... L.? force main to be extended to Purgatory Creek Interceptor • F' / . f ° . • II additional landscaping at timf of phase 1 08 ° 8 acre 84 ;,0 0 -- • n Deing at s:tPhasem, ot \ I. -,--) n I /' i ,,,I• 1 1 1 ... HI I ; ... 2 1—..--...1 1 1 I ' 1 I 1 ••2 ..,' i • ; ,.: ....‘........jr— 1 / ,••• ,..14 I •••n••"."‘ k ,•••‘" _.,.._. s..., ,,-- \ \ , , ,, i _ _._.._ __.... 1 _ . `............:::....•."-7-.. : I --I' /....,' • : i ' I ( I, ! ! .- -1 ...L_ __i_...J 1..__;_ — _L _i__ MISS • g — -7r • ,TCULS, jii,Z•rtar.a. •-•,, ,------- portion o!fOuck Lake Road to be improved with phase I 16 acres dedicated to City covir ..... ,.._••••••cs_ ...• . =: : Z.:. •••—•- • ••-•... ••• • •-• - • • • • ••-•—• — • 22.27:•.:!:';=:".-7.==.1... elocation of utilities needed t watermain connec- tion to Chatham Way 1 & Townline Road intersection Woodratviv qicigkis LYMAN LUMBER Co. . , .• -.....„,.... .....: '.....,, ....------ , ,..--,,v,..------3,,,:rk.• --,,,...2 a...4 i:"' • .0,..''''', , .........4.-11...............1/ .C,,,,,......., ,i_ .........,,I....1./.."\s.,..."y„,,.....:,....,,,...-1.-h' „....,_4 L(.....--.1:1:1__:—: '.-_,-,-,----; x ).'-- ,,,...2-,-7.-------:5-:7_:',1,.%"---: .r)---•:o ./.....:,..., ''' ''''''',1 \ ",.." ‘ •••n•'; 1 (. -,- .... \ ....T.... 1_ .--7,:ti ,.,..,, '''S.-L — 3.- -r --t::•(--• ---ar '.... ----)( t•'*'-.Z.) „....)...• i 1 •••••••--iy,,,.-- , ......_•>.•,.._ • ..-- s _i_.. 7\r----417-n--, • -5, ..._.....- • n \ •il- 40, SITE PLAN) EXHIBIT G FIGURE 1 PACCOBS-XWUTSONASSOVATES. IN
ecernb.J. jli, 1:/t31
Mr. William Dearman, Chairman
Eden Prairie -Dlanninr Commission
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344
Ret Lyman Lumber request for zoning
and preliminary plat approval
for southwest corner of Duck
Enke Road and Town] inn Road.
Dear Chairman Bearmant
On Aurust 18th the City Council approved the PUD concept for up to
150 residential units on approximately 80 acres on the subject parcel.
On July 9th the local residents presented to the Planninr Commission
e letter raisina'cr,rtain issues on the proposed subdivision. In
reviewing the current proposal by Lyman Lumber and in response
to the staff report, the residents would at this time recommend that
certain chanITs be made in the preliminary plat plan. These chances
are as follows.
1. That park dedication on the southwest corner of the site be for
the purpose compatible with the existinr parkland located to the
south' that is passive parkland. Therefore, the ball diamond and
tennis courts should be located on the northerly portion of the
sit-. It should be noted that this was a commitment made to the
resid•nits by the Flannine Commission at its July
2. Th ,,t the "Ic:od duck" pond located in th.,? north ,i7st corner of the
site be preserved and that but) dine lots not int,,rfer with or
alt -T any cd the existin, natural sherelim in t:i ,t nrr ,a. This
was also a co-mitnt made to th. rlic1 ,13tn by the Flannin.
Commission.
3. That the propos ,.d strict and lot layout be altcr,:d to eliminate
any cut on the major rise that approximately bisct.s the site
from east to vest, thus eliminatinv a major cuttinr and
asp.!ct or the existinl plan.
4. That the phasinr of devel4m.Aat be such that the burden of
transition of density be placed on the developer. That is the
single family be phased first and the multi-family be phased
second thus insorinr the marketability and feasibility of the
sin 10 family dovelopm ,nt.
Enclosed for your von ,ideration is an alternative plat Jeqign whi7h
Incorporates each of the concepts Outlined above. We offer this to
demonstrate that the lubject parcel can be dev-lopcd to a reasonable
denity without doAroyinr the natural •meniti ,,s now existin on the
site. The residents remain available to work with the di.v-lopyr and
the planninr staff to aid in the accomidation O . these n-ees:iary
cham:es to the current proposal.
Sincerely,
Trim. Residents
1 15
I7( c,b+1.
Ed(bn Prft:tt'm
113o
telvn PAa,i)Lit, miVs-s3vy
l'71100 vf,
eA-,.PAAA,E.,
/74.00 tc). 10(6,..,sL
ganr, Puti .A.L0, 13tA-
?61 7.21%,
/736c; w.Cic
fJeA P&L.; t .14 ,
: ; —L- _L_i L• • i'1'71171'.111‘j!?4,1_ \-• • ; • 1:;:o., .1 ; , t•; is eft. weer. I% qua u.; 47 s;,..fites 4-7 T01 117 Wool& qici81173- LYMAN LUMBER CO. •SSOC.,:tES "do .... j PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN EXHIBIT I
' NOV. '81
MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (LAW)
AND NOTICE OF FINDINGS
DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE
E.R.#
NOTE: The purpose of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (LAW) is to provide
information on a project so that one can assess rapidly whether or not the
project requires an Environmental Impact Statement. Attach additional
pages, charts, maps, etc., as needed to answer these questions. Your
answers should be as specific as possible. Indicate which answers are
estimated.
I. SUMMARY
A. ACTIVITY FINDING BY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY (PERSON)
Negative Declaration (No EIS) EIS Preparation Notice (EIS Requi•
B. ACTIVITY IDENTIFICATION
1. Project name or title WOODEAWN HEIGHTS
2. Project proppser(s) Lyman Lumber Company
' Address 300 Morse Aveune, Excelsior, MN 55331
Telephone Number and Area Code ( 612 ) 474-5991
3. Responsible Agency or Person City of Eden Prairie
Address 8950 Eden Prairie Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Pefton in Responsible Agency (Person) to contact for further information
on this EAW: Chris Enger, Director of Plng. Telephone (612) 937-2262
4. This EAW and other supporting documentation are available for public in-
spection and/or copying at: Location City of Eden Prairie
Telephone (612) 937-2262 Hours8:00am-4:30F
5. Reason for EAW Preparation '
Mandatory Category -cite r---1 Petition DOther
MEQC Rule number(s)MEQC24-B.1(cc) I I
Residential of 40+ acres part of which is within floodplain.
C. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION SUMMARY
1. Project Location
County Hennepin City/Township name Eden Prairie
Township number 116 (North), Range Number 22 East or West (circ1(
Section number(s) 5 & 6 Street address (if in city) or legal description:
The East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Sec
t
i
o
n
6
,
Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, ALSO
The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 5 and the S
o
u
t
h
-
east Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 5 lying north of the
s
o
u
t
h
957.00 feet, all in Township 118, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesot
a
.
2. Type and scope of proposed project:
54 Single family attached and 96 detached units, totalling 150 units
spread over an area of 80 acres. Also two park areas, one a natural
environmental park and one active park.
3. Estimated starting date (month/year) Spring, 1982
4. Estimated completion date (month/year) 1984
5. Estimated construction cost 7 million
6. List any federal funding involved and known permits or approvals ne
e
d
e
d
from each unit of government and status of each:
Unit of Government Name or Type of Permit/Approval Status
(federal, state . or Federal Funding
regional, local)
State MWPCA - Sewer Extension
State Dept. of Health-Watermain connec-
tion
Local Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed
Required, not yet
applied for
Required, not yet
applied for
Pending
Local City of Eden Prairie -
Preliminary Plan - 'Pending
Final Plan Required, not yet
Zoning applied for
EQB Finding of No Significant Impact Pending
7. If federal permits, funding or approvals are involved, will a federal
EIS be prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act?
..INO YES
UNKNOW'
II. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
A. Include the fbllowing maps or drawings:
1. A map showing the regional location of the project.(attach
e
d
)
2. An original 8 x 11 section of a U.S.G.S. 7 3i minute, 1:24,000 scale
map with the activity or project area boundaries and site
l
a
y
o
u
t
delineated. Indicate quadrangle sheet name. (Original U.S
.
G
.
S
.
s
h
e
e
t
must be maintained by Responsible Agency; legible copies
m
a
y
b
e
s
u
p
p
l
i
e
d
to other EAW distribution points) attached.
3. A sketch map of the site showing location of structures i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
significant natural features (water bodies, roads, etc.)
a
t
t
a
c
h
e
d
.
4. Current photos of the site must be maintained by the Resp
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
A
g
e
n
c
y
.
Photos need not be sent to other distribution points.
B. Present land use.
1. Briefly describe the present use of the site and lands
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
site.
Currently the property is void of structures and a portion
i
s
b
e
i
n
g
'
leased for agricultural purposes. The north edge of the sit
e
b
o
r
d
e
r
s
the City of Minnetonka where single family development has t
a
k
e
n
p
l
a
c
e
.
To the east and south within Eden Prairie, single family de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
h
a
s
occured. To the west within Eden Prairie, there are sparse
l
y
s
c
a
t
t
e
r
e
d
' single family units westerly to Highway 101.
2. Indicate the approximate acreages of the site that are:
a. Urban developed 0 acres f. Wetlands (Type III, IV, V)3.2 acres
b. Urban vacant . 0 acres
c. Rural developed 0 acres
d. Rural vacant DO acres
e. Designated Rec-
reation/Open
Space 20 acres
g. Shorel and
h. Floodplain
I. Cropland/Pasture land
J. Forested
0 acres
13.6 acres
9.6 acres
14.6 acres
*Note: Total Acreage of site in this category other are sub
-
c
a
t
e
g
o
r
i
e
s
3. List names and sizes of lakes, rivers and streams on
o
r
n
e
a
r
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
,
particularly lakes within 1,000 feet and rivers and stream
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
300 feet.
Purgatory Creek lies within approximately 300 feet of the s
o
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
e
r
l
y
parcel of this site..
C. Activity Description
I. Describe the proposed activity, including staging of develo
p
m
e
n
t
(
i
f
a
n
y
)
,
operational characteristics, and major types of equipment a
n
d
/
o
r
p
r
o
-
cesses to be used. Include data that would indicate the mag
n
i
t
u
d
e
o
f
the proposed activity (e.g. rate of production, number of c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
,
tons of raw materials, etc.).
Development Mothod'- Single family attached and detached uni
t
s
a
r
e
proposed for the majority of the property. Two park areas a
r
e
a
l
s
o
shown. One park area would be an activity area consisting o
f
a
p
-
proximately eight acres. The other area is proposed as "nat
u
r
a
l
environment" park and consists of approximately 20 acres.
Development Timing - It is the intent of the owners that th
e
s
i
t
e
grading and utility installation begin during the 1982 cons
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
season.
• Occupancy of the area and actual building construction woul
d
t
a
k
e
place over a three to fear year period as the market d:ctat
e
s
s
a
l
e
of the units.
2. Fill in the following where applicable:
• a. Total project area
-or-
Length •
b. Number of housing or
recreational units 150
c. Height of structures
d. Number of parking
spaces
NA
Size of marina and access NA sq.
channel (water area)
Vehicular traffic trips
generated per day . 1200 ADT
I. Number of employees NA
Water supply needed 39,500gal:
Source:City of Eden Prairie
k. Soild waste requiring .
disposal 230 tc.
80 acres
9-
miles
h.
30 ft.
S.
e. Amount of dredging
Nonecu.yd. I. Commercial, retail or
Industrial floor space NA sq.1
f. Liquid wastes requir-
ing treatment 31,50pgal/da
III. ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
A. SOILS AND TOPOGRAPHY
I. Will the project be built in an area with slopes currently
exceeding 12%? NO X YES
2. Are there other geologically unstable areas involved in th
e
project, such as fault zones, shrink-swell soils, pcatland
s
,
or sinkholes? X NO YES
3. If yes on I or 2, describe slope conditions or unstable area
and any measures to be used to reduce potential adverse im
p
a
c
t
s
.
Required measures to reduce adverse impacts resulting from
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
of slopes include: -
I) The erosion and sediment control plan will be submitted
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
Watershed Policy.
2) Existing trees and brush or shrubs will be preserved wher
e
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
t
o
prevent erosion.
3) Reveoetation will take place after grading is completed.
4) Sediment control devices will be placed along slopes where
e
r
o
s
i
o
n
and sedimentation potentials are high l as per the Watershed's rules
UNITED STATES . DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY EXCELSIOR QUADRANGLE HOPKINS QUADRANGLE Woodrawit, (Weigh-is LYMAN LIDASER CO.
0 LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT A
..coe ,/4 w- ‘ / / 1 .. <4.,>-` „ • s, ....-- ....- 1 1 I m i I ft I I I. _L______1_, 1......1._1_1._IF2.;., 174,.7.—FTZ:471111-11,7c.W...ntait,-.4 I , . , 1 ---1 I -1 -1:1- cWoodrawn) clitigar LYMAN LUNEER CO. j SITE ANALYSIS EXHIBIT 0 MCOWIS3APN13001 ASSOPATES. INC.
*541REL.JSZMIA • 7'1 . • (utic•cycLoPL:r) 0 ' IT-- 1 ,4 C-(.Z) 0 OiraiV11...) -I .. \ _ 14i u I. Ii —r- —r a... I , tn. ,n•••1 01.4.4 Lhat r7.70.-57.4174.—iirc tumcwct.r.s.c.s; (or. NADI 11.040ClitLegl..02.... ea.. LYMAN LUMBER CO. ...ay • M. PRELIMINARY PLAT ,......., litC041354(N1/11,' ASSOCIATES. INC. EXI-BBIT H
4. Indicate suitability of site soils for foundations, individual septic
systems, and ditching, if these are included in the project.
The majority of soils encountered on the site constitute part of the
Hayden eliy loam class of soil. The existing drainage ways are
occupied by the organic soils.
In areas where construction of either roadway or buildings is antici-
pated, the peat material will be replaced with suitable foundation
material.
There will be no individual on-site septic systems as a part of the
overall development. The proposed development can be considered
compatible with the soils in the area.
5. Estimate the total amount of grading and filling which will be done:
175,000 cu4d. grading175,000cu.yd. filling
What percent of the site will be so altered?
6. What will be the maximum finished slopes?
7. What steps will be taken to minimize soil erosion during and
after construction?
See Hydrology Section, 0-3
B. VEGETATION
1. Approximately what percent of the site is in each of the following
vegetative types:
Woodland
Brush or shrubs
17.8% Cropland/
Pasture
10 % Marsh
12.0 %
21 %
Grass or herbaceous 39.2% Other 0 %
(specify)
2. How many acres of forest or woodland will be cleared, if any? 2.3 acres
3. Are there any rare or endangered plant species or areas of unique
botanical or biological significance on the site? (See DNR publication
The Common Ones.) YES X NO .
If yes, list the species or area and indicate any measures to be used
to reduce potential adverse impact.
42 %
3:1 %
C. FISH AND WILDLIFE
I. Are there any designated federal, state or local wildlife or fish
m
a
n
a
g
e
-
ment areas or sanctuaries near or adjacent to the site? NO X YES
2. Are there any known rare or endangered species of fish or wildlif
e
o
n
or near the site? (see DNR publication The Uncommon Ones). X NO YES
3. Will the project alter or eliminate wildlife or fish habitat? NO X YLS
4. If yes on any of questions 1-3:list the area, species or habitat, a
n
d
indicate any measures to be used to reduce potential adverse impact
o
n
them.
The Purgatory Creek wildlife and trail corridor is adjacent to the s
i
t
e
'
s
southwest side.
ensite:
Birds and small animals will have their habitat temporarily disturbed
,
forcing them to seek alternate shelter during the construction of the
site. It is the developer's intent to remove as few trees as necess
a
r
y
for the construction of the buildings and roadways, allowing for a
minimum amount of interruption of some wildlife in the area.
The proposed pending area will promote wetland vegetation, introduce
a
large amount of aquatic growth, and provide a wildlife habitat.
D. HYDROLOGY
I. Will the project include any of the following:
If yes, describe type of work and mitigative measures
to reduce adverse impacts. NO YES
a. Drainage or alteration of any lake, pond, marsh,
lowland, or groundwater supply
b. Shore protection works, dams, or dikes
c. Dredging or filling operations
d. Channel modifications or diversions
e. Appropriation of ground and/or surface water
X
f. Other changes in the course, current or cross-
section of water bodies on or near the site
X
2. What percent of the area will be converted to new impervious surfac
e
?
1
5
'
.
3. What measures will be taken to reduce the volume of surface water r
u
n
-
off and/or treat it to reduce pollutants (sediment, oil, gas, etc.)?
1) On-site storm water retention areas.
2) -Hay bales or filter fence will be placed on steep slopes and
around catch basin inlets as needed.
3) Revegetation will take place in the disturbed areas after grading
is completed.
Erosion control methods will be installed as per Watershed rules &re
g
u
l
a
:
. 4. Will there be encroachment into the regional (100 year) fiood
p
l
a
i
n
by new fill or structures? X NO YES
If yes, does it conform to the local floodplain ordinance
NO ...L ..YES
5. What is the approximate minimum depth to groundwater on the
site? Elev. 870 - Northeast Portion
Elev. 892 - Southwest Portion
feet
None
1. If the project is or includes a landfill, attach information on soil
profile depth to water table, and proposed depth of disposal.
NA
E. WATER QUALITY
1. Will there be a discharge of process or cooling water, sanitary sewage
or other waste waters to any water body or to groundwater? X NO YES
If yes, specify the volume, the concentration of pollutants and the
water body. receiving the effluent.
2. If discharge of waste water to the municipal treatment system is
planned, identify any toxic, corrosive or unusual pollutants in the
wastewater.
3. Will any sludges be generated by the proposed project? X NO YES
If yes, specify the expected volume, chemical composition and method
of disposal.
4. What measures will be used to minimize the volumes or impacts identified
in questions 1-3?
F. AIR QUALITY AND NOISE
.1. Will the activity cause the elimination of any gases and/or particul-
ates into the atmosphere? NO X YES
If yes, specify the type and origin of these emissions, indicate any
emission control devices or measures to be used, and specify the ap-
proximate .amounts for each emission (at the source) both with and without
the emission control measures or devices.
The residential units planned for the site will not be significant
stationary emission sources. Therefnre, traffic nonorAted by the
development will produce the majority of the gaseous and particulate
emissions attributable to the site. The hydrocarbon (HC) and oxides
of nitrogen (N0x) emissions are key components in the complex chemical
reaction which forms photochemical exidants such as ozone. This reaction
involves the mixing of chemicals from air movement and exposure to
sunlight. As a result, the total CH and NOx emissions primarily affect
the region as a whole rather than concentrated sites. Carbon monoxide
(CO) has a direct impact and can be specific to a localized area.
Transportation sources contribute a relatively small portion of the
particulate emissions in the region so the development will have a
negligible effect on the regionwide particulate levels.
The increase in traffic due to the site will have a negligible impact
on the total emission of CH and NOx for the region. No violations of
the federal ozone standard have been recorded at any of the monitoring
stations in the Twin Cities Area from 1976 through the latest data
reported in 1978 according to the "Air Quality Control Plan For
Transportation" dated January, 1980. The plan also anticipates signif-
icant reductions in RC emissions between 1977 and 1987 due to the
current transportation plans, the expected changes in travel character-
istics, and the eventual replacement of older, unregulated vehicles by
vehicles meeting the current federal emission standards. NOx emissions
are not currently considered an air quality problem in the projected
decrease for the same reasons as the HC emission level decrease.
Site preparation by heavy earth moving equipment will result in
emission of gas and soil particulates into the air. Such emission
should be dissipated at the site's boundary. If emissions go beyond
the site boundary, watering will be required.
The highest CO levels in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area are gen-
erally concentrated in densely developed Minneapolis and St. Paul
CBO's. The concentration of CO in the region is anticipated to be
significantly reduced between 1977 and 1987 due to the transportation
plan, the expected changes in travel characteristics, and the change
in the vehicle fleet resulting from the replacement of older vehicles
by vehicles meeting more stringent emission standards. The following
three maps of the current and projected carbon monoxide emissions
illustrate the reduction which is projected to occur due soley to the
change in the vehicle fleet. Additional reductions will be realized by
incorporation of the transportation plan and by changes in travel
characteristics.
The area containing the WOODLAWN HEIGHTS site has, and is projected
to have, very low concentrations of carbon monoxide. In 1977, the
site was in the lowest category of carbon monoxide concentration.
Projections for the region for 1982 and 1987 indicate that this
site will remain in the lowest category.
DENSITY PATTERN OF CARBON MONOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM
VEHICLE TRIPS IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA, 1977
Carbon Monoxide Emissions
(in kg. per sq. mi. per day;
for COW, in kg. per day)
00.2.499
a 10.000 • 14,999
02,500. 4,999
015.000 - 19,999
Dow • 9.999
a 20,000a
(Source: "Air Quality Control Plan For Transportation."
Metropolitan Council, January, 1980)
-Q.
PROJECTED DENSITY PATTERN OF CARBON MONOXIDE EMISSIONS
FROM VEHICLE TRIPS IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA, 1982
Carbon Monoxide Emissions
(in kg. per sq. mi. per day:
the CEI0s. In kg. pm day)
002.49$ N I0000 • 14,999
02.500 • 4.999 la spoos
05,000.9999
(Source: "Air quality Control Plan For Transportation."
Metropolitan Council, January, 1980)
PROJECTED DENSITY PATTERN OF CARBON MONOXIDE EMISSIONS
FROM VEHICLE TRIPS IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA, 1987
Carbon Monoxide Emissions
On kg. per sq. mi. per day;
for CODs, In kg. per day)
0 0 2.499
0 2,500 4,999
IS 5,0004
(Source: "Air Quality Control Plan For Transportation."
Metropolitan Council, January, 1980)
2. Will noise or vibration be generated by construction and/or operation
of the project? NO X YES.
If yes, describe the noise source(s); specify decibel levels 1 .118 (g .
and noisq/vibration.
During the construction phase of the development the operating of
construction equipment and the conducting of construction activities
will be confined to the hours from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM. The noise
reduction effects of the natural topography, natural vegetation, con-
struction berms, constructed houses, and limited construction hours
will be adequate to achieve acceptable noise level conditions during
the construction phase.
The residential land use in the development will not be the source
of significant noise levels. This -land use is compatible with
the surrounding areas which consist of residential deulopments to
the north, east, and south and scattered residences to the west.
The primary source of noise generated by the proposed land use
activities will be due to vehicular traffic: However, the impact
of the additional traffic generated by the site is not expected
to significantly increase the vehicular noise in the area because it
will be confined to low speed local traffic.. Therefore, no problems
are anticipated with excessive noise.
3. If yes on 1 or 2, specify whether any areas sensitive to noise or
reduced air quality-(hospitals, elderly housing, wilderness, wildlife
areas,.residential developments, etc.) are in the affected area and
. give distance from source.
There will be no significant air quality and noise impacts on the
site for the reasons explained in Sections F.1 and F.2.
-12-
GI
G. LAND RESOURCE CONSERVATION, ENERGY
1. Is any of the site suitable for agricultural or forestry production
or currently in such use? NO X YES
If yes, specify the acreage involved, type and volume of marketable
crop or wood produced and the quality of the land for such use.
About ten acres of the BO acre site is currently used to produce
miscellaneous cash crops.
2. Are there any known mineral or peat deposits on the site? X NO YES
If yes, specify the type of deposit and the acreage.
3. Will the project result in an increased energy demand?
NO X YES
Complete the following applicable:
a. Energy requirements (oil, electricity, gas, coal, solar, etc.)
4
•
Type
CSIAMdLCU
Annual.
Requirement
red& UUMUHU
Hourly or Daily
Summer Winter
Anticipated
Supplier
Firm Contract or
Interruptable Basis?
Electricity '2.047.500 kwh 8,530 kwb NA — NSP Firm
Gas 9,000 mcf • NA 63 mcf Minneciasco Unknown
•
•
•
b. Estimate the capacity of all proposed on-site fuel storage.
NA
c. Estimate annual energy distribution for:
space heating 57 % lighting 10 %
air conditioning 70 % processing 8 %
Ventilation 5 %
d. Specify any major energy conservation systems and/or equipment
incorporated into this project.
1) Solar Collectors 3) Building Sitting
2) Landscaping al. 4) Total Energy Management
e. What secondary energy use effects may result from this project
(e.g. more or longer car trips, induced housing or businesses, etc.)?
This development is not expected to induce any significant amount
of commercial development since it is located near regional and
neighborhood shopping centers and near to major employment centers.
Therefore, no significant increase in trip lengths are expected.
M. OPEN SPACE/RECERATION •
1. Are there any designated federal, state, county or local recreation or
. open space areas near the site (including wild and scenic rivers, trails,
lake accesses)? NO X YES
If yes, list areas by name and explain how each may be affected by the
project. Indicate any measures to be used to reduce adverse impacts.
Purgatory Creek, a wildlife corridor and lineal trail system is located
approximately 300 feet southwest of the extreme southwest corner of the
site. No adverse impacts are anticipated.
The average weekday trips and the AM and PM peak hours trips which will -
be generated by the site were projected. The trip generation rates
used
I. TRANSPORTATION
.1. Will the project affect any existing or proposed transportation systems
(highway, railroad, water, airport, etc.)? NO YES
If yes, specify which part(s) of the system(s) will be affected. For
these, specify existing use and capacities, average traffic speed and •
percentage of truck traffic (if highway); and indicate how they will be
affected by the project (e.g. congestion, percentage of truck traffic,
safety, increased traffic (ADT), access requirements).
The average weekday trips and the AM and PM peak hours trips which
will be generated by the site were projected. The trip generation
rates used for each of the projected land uses were obtained from
the manual of Trip Generation published by the Institute of Trans-
portation Engineers and are presented in Table 1. The 1TE manual
provides the results of numerous studies of vehicle trips entering
and exiting various types of land uses for the daily total and for
the AM and PM peak hour periods. The total number of additional
trips were found by multiplying the number of dwelling units of each
type by the appropriate trip generation figured from Table 1.
The ITE manual trip generation rates may need adjustment to avoid
over estimation of the additional trips actually generated by the
site. This over estimation can result because the rates in the 1TE
manual are based on driveway counts made at each of the land uses
studied. The driveway counts did not identify the types of trios
and the impact of the factors (such as increased transit and para-
transit, higher fuel costs, and flexible working hours) which affect
local travel behavior. Each time a vehicle entered or exited a
driveway it simply was counted as an additional site generation trip.
Therefore, these projected values likely over estimate the actual
number of trips which will be generated since these factors can total
to account for a reduction in the number of vehicle trips generated
by fifteen to thirty percent.
Table 1
Trip Generation Rates
Single Family
Detached Home
10.0/dwelling unit
0.3
0.6
78-
PM Peak Hour Trip - Enter
0.7
- Exit 0.4
Total 10
Average Weekday Trips
AM Peak Hour Trip - Enter
- Exit
Total
Townhome
5.1/dwelling unit
0.1
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.6
Source: Trip Generation by Institute of Transportation Engineers.
-15- 0
Table 2
Total Trip Generation
Single Family
Detached Home Townhome Total
Average Weekday Trips 540
AM Peak Hour Trips
- Enter 16
- Exit 32
Total 43
490 1030
10 . 26
48 eo
• 48 91
PM Peak Hour Trips
- Enter 38
- Exit 22
Total 54
38
19
58
76
. 41
112
The existing street system serving the site, Duck Lake Road and Townline
Road both need improvements. Duck Lake Road will be widened and hard-
surfaced along with utility and drainage improvements north to Woodlawn
Heights. Townline Road will undergo City improvements of widening existing
surface stripping, drainage and utility work. First phase development
of Woodlawn Heights', southern portion of single family and southern
of townhouses is planned to coincide with Duck Lake Road improvements.
Duck Lake Road is designated as a collector and Townline Road is des-
ignated as a minor arterial. These classifications are aimed at
serving this type of development.
There will not be any heavy commercial vehicle traffic generated by the
development.
Access will be via one curb cut located on Townline Road and two on
Duck Lake Road. The proposed location of the curb cuts are shown in
the site plan included.
2. Is Mass transit available to the §ite?
NO X YES
The site is not directly served by the Metropolitan Transit Commission
bus service currently serving the area. However, both regular line bus
service and express bus service as available in the area. Regular line
bus service is proivded by Route 67 which passes near the site at the
intersection of Townline Road and Highway 101. Express bus service to
Downtown Minneapolis is provided by Express Route 533 which passes to
the south of the site along West 78th Street. Park and ride lots are
located nearby at West 78th Street and Highway 101 and West 78th Street
and Mitchell Road.
3. What measures, including transit and paratransit services, are planned to
reduce adverse impacts?
Provision will be made for adequate S'pace for possible future bus
related road improvements which would be coordinated with the Metro-
politan Transit Commission if a route is created to pass along either
Townline Road or Duck Lake Road.
J. PLANNING, LAND USE, COMMUNITY SERVICES'
• 1. Is the project consistent with local and/or regional comprehensive plans?
If not, explain: NO x YES
If a zoning change or special use permit is necessary, indicate existing
zoning and change requested.
Existing Zoning - Rural
Proposed Zoning - Residential Planned Unit Development: R1-13.5 and RN 6.5 zoh
' 2. Will the type or height of the project conflict with the character of the
existing neighborhood? X NO YES
If yes, explain type of development and specify any measures to be used to
reduce conflicts.
3. How many employees wil) move into the area to be near the project? NA
How much housing will be needed? NA
4. Will the project induce development nearby--either support services or
similar developments? X NO YES
If yes, explain type of development and specify any other counties and munici-
palities affected.
The development is not expected to induce any significant development of
. support services. Since it is located adjacent to existing residential
. development, it will utilize these existing services.
5. Is there sufficient capacity in the following public services to handle the
project and any associated growth?
Amount required
ca acit ?
Water 39,500 gal/da Yes
Wastewater treatment 31,500 gal/da Yes
Sewer 6,750 feet • Yes
Schools 220 pupils Yes
Solid waste disposal 20 • ton/mo Yes
Streets 0.9 miles Yes
Other (police, fire, etc) •
If current major public faciiities -are not adequate, do existing local
plans call for expansion, or is expansion necessary strictly for this
one project and its associated impacts?
The above public services are existing planned extensions by the City of
Eden Prairie.
-18 -
•
6. Is the project within a proposed or designated Critical Area or part
of a Related Actions EIS or other environmentally sensitive plan or
program reviewed by the EC? X NO YES
If yes, specify which area or plan.
7. Will the project involve the use, transportation, storage, release
or disposal of potentially hazardous or toxic liquids, solids, on
gaseous substances such as pesticides, radioactive wastes, poisons,
etc? X NO YES
If yes, please specify the substance and rate of usage and any measures
to be taken to minimize adverse environmental impacts from accidents.
8. When the project has served its useful life, will retirement of the
facility require special measures or plans? X NO YES
If yes, specify:
K. HISTORIC RESOURCES
1. Are there any structures on the site older than 50 years or on
federal or state historical registers? X NO YES
2. Have any arrowheads, pottery or other evidence of prehistoric or early
.settlement been found on the site? X NO YES
Might any known archaeoligic or palentological sites be affected by
the activity? X NO YES
. 3. List any site'or structure identified in 1 and 2 and explain any
impact on them.
L. OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS
Describe any other major environmental effects which may not have been
identified in the previous sections.
III.OTHER MITIGATIVE MEASURES
Briefly describe mitigative measures proposed to reduce or eliminate potential
adverse impacts that have not been described before.
-19- ()
V. FINDINGS
The project is a private (__.) governmental (.X) action. The Responsible Agency
' (Person), after consideration of the information in this EAW, and the
f
a
c
t
o
r
s
In Minn. Reg. MEQC 25, makes the following findings.
I. The project is (__) is not( X) a major action.
State reasons:
2. The project does (__.) does not ( X) have the potential for signific
a
n
t
environmental effects.
State reasons:
3. .(For private actions only.) The project is (_j is not (__) of more than
local significance.
State reasons:
IV. CONCLUSIONS AND CERTIFICATION
NOTE: A Negative Declaration or EIS Preparation Notice is not offici
a
l
l
y
f
i
l
e
d
until the date of publication of the notice in the EQC Monitor section of
the Minnesota State Register. Submittal of the EAW to the EQC constitutes
a request for publication of notice in the gc Monitor.
A. I, the undersigned, am either the authorized representative of the Re
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
Agency or the Responsible Person identified below. Based on the ab
o
v
e
f
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
,
the Responsible Agency (Person) makes the following conclusions. (
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
either 1 or 2).
1. -X NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE
No EIS is needed on this project, because the project is not a
major action and/or does not have the potential for significant
environmental effects and/or, for private actions only, the
' project is not of more than local significance.
6,9 -pn-
2. EIS PREPARATION NOTICE .
— An EIS will be prepared on this project because
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
a
major action and has the potential for significant en
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
effects. For private actions, the project is also o
f
m
o
r
e
t
h
a
n
local significance.
a. The MEQC Rules provide that physical construction or
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
project must stop when an EIS is required. In specia
l
c
i
r
c
u
m
s
t
a
n
c
e
s
,
the MEQC can specifically authorize limited construc
t
i
o
n
t
o
b
e
g
i
n
or continue. If you feel there are special circumsta
n
c
e
s
i
n
t
h
i
s
project, specify the extent of progress recommended
a
n
d
t
h
e
r
e
a
s
o
n
s
.
b. Date Draft EIS will be submitted:
(month) (day) (year)
(MEQC Rules require that the Draft EIS be submitted
w
i
t
h
i
n
1
2
0
d
a
y
s
of publication of the EIS Preparation Notice in th
e
E
Q
C
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
.
I
f
special circumstances prevent compliance with this
t
i
m
e
l
i
m
i
t
,
a
written request for extension explaining the reason
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
• must be submitted to the EQC Chairman:)
c. The Draft EIS will be prepared by (list Responsible
A
g
e
n
c
y
(
s
)
o
r
Person(s):
Signatur
Cal J. Jullie, City Manager Title
Date
B. Attach an affidavit certifying the date that copies
o
f
t
h
i
s
E
A
W
w
e
r
e
m
a
i
l
e
d
to all points on the official EQC distribution list,
t
o
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
a
n
d
c
o
u
n
t
y
directly impacted, and to adjacent counties or munici
p
a
l
i
t
i
e
s
l
i
k
e
l
y
t
o
b
e
directly impacted by the proposed action (refer to q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
1
1
1
.
J
.
4
o
n
p
a
g
e
11 of the EAW). The affidavit need be attached only
t
o
t
h
e
c
o
p
y
o
f
t
h
e
E
A
W
which is sent to the EQC.
C. Billing procedures for Eqc Monitor Publication
State agency Attach to the EAW sent to the EQC a completed OSR 100
ONLY: form (State Register General Order Form--available
a
t
Central Stores). For instructions. please contact
y
o
u
r
Agency's Liaison Officer to the State Register or t
h
e
Office of State Register--(612) 296-8239.
'10
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 82-07
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE WOODLAWN HEIGHTS
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND AMENDING THE
GUIDE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of Ordinance 135
provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas lo-
cated within the City, and
WHEREAS, the Woodlawn Heights PUD is considered a proper amendment
to the 1979 Comprehensive Guide Plan, and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing
on Lyman Lumber's PUD request for approval of 54 single family and 96
attached units and dedication of open space, and recommended approval
of the PUD Concept to the City Council, and
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on Jan. 5, 1982.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota as follows:
1. The Woodlawn Heights PUD, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota,
and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, attached
hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD approval as outlined
in the application material dated October, 1981.
3. That the PUD meet the recommendations of the Planning Comm-
ission dated December 14, 1981.
ADOPTED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie this
day of
, 1982.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
SEAL
11
Parcel A The East 338.00 feet of the North 450.00 feet of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 5, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Containing 3.49 acres more or less. . Parcel B Beginning at the northwest corner of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter-of Section 5, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of South 1 degree 23 minutes 11 seconds East along the West line of said West Hall 1004.00 feet; thence North 88 degrees 36 minutes 49 seconds East 129.37 feet: thence South 54 degrees 49 minutes 43 seconds East 250.00 feet; thence North 57 degrees 10 minutes 17 seconds East 480.00 feet; thence North 25 degrees 57 minutes 45 seconds West 123.22 feet; thence North 0 degrees 18 minutes 20 seconds East 123.22 feet; thence North 10 degrees 04 minutes 27 seconds East 61.47 feet; thence South 79 degrees 55 minutes 33 seconds East 351.37 feet; thence North 68 degrees 04 minutes 27 seconds East 305.00 feet to the intersection with the East line of said West Half; thence Northerly along the said East line to the northeast corner of said West Half; thence westerly along the north line of said West Half to the point of beginning, except the East 338.00 feet of the North 450.00 feet of said West Half. Containing 22.94 acres more or less. toe
Parcel C Beginning at the northwest corner of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 5, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of South 1 degree 23 minutes 11 seconds East along the west line of said West Half 1004.00 feet; thence North 88 degrees 36 minutes 49 seconds East 129.37 feet; thence South 54 degrees 49 minutes 43 seconds East 250.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence North 57 degrees 10 minutes 17 seconds East 480.00 feet; thence North 25 degrees 57 minutes 45 seconds West 123.22 feet; thence North 0 degrees 18 minutes 20 seconds East 123.22 feet; thence North 10 degrees 04 minutes 27 seconds East 61.47 feet; thence South 79 degrees 55 minutes 33 seconds East 351.37 feet; thence North 68 degrees 04 minutes 27 seconds East 305.00 feet to the intersection with the East line of - said West Half; thence southerly along said East line 1405.91 feet to the North line of the South 957.00 feet of said West Half; thence westerly along said North line 984.87 feet; thence North 1 degree 40 minutes 17 seconds East 288.00 feet; thence North 71 degrees 40 minutes 17 seconds East 135.00 feet; thence North 11 degrees 49 minutes 43 seconds West 140.00 feet; thence North 2 degrees 12 minutes West 95.08 feet; thence North 24 degrees 33 minutes East 95.08 feet; thence North 54 degrees 49 minutes 43 seconds West 210.00 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 25.23 acres more or less. Public—Quasi Public Commencing at the northwest corner of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 5, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of South 1 degrees 23 minutes 11 seconds East along the West line of said West Half 1004.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence North 88 degrees 36 minutes 49 seconds East 129.37 feet; thence South 54 degrees 49 minutes 43 seconds East 460.00 feet; thence South 24 degrees 33 minutes West 95.08 feet; thence South 2 degrees 12 minutes 25 seconds East 95.08 feet; thence South 11 degrees 49 minutes 43 seconds East 140.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 40 minutes 17 seconds West 135.00; thence South 1 degree 40 minutes 17 seconds West 288.00 feet to the intersection with the north line of the South 957.00 feet of said West Half; thence westerly along said south line to the southwest corner of said West Half; thence northerly along the west line of said West Half to the point of beginning. ALSO The East One Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota. C aining 28.31 acres more or less.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 82-08
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF WOODLAWN HEIGHTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Woodlawn Heights
dated Oct., 1981 , a copy of which is on file at the City Hall
and amended as follows:
is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie
Zoning and Platting ordinances and amendments thereto and is herein
approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of
19 .
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
John D. Frane, City Clerk
SEAL
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 82-09
A RESOLUTION FINDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
WORKSHEET FOR WOODLAWN HEIGHTS A PRIVATE ACTION
DOES NOT REQUIRE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
WHEREAS, the City Council of Eden Prairie did hold a hearing on
Jan. 5, 1982 to consider the Woodlawn Heights proposal, and
WHEREAS, said development is located on approximately 60 acres
of land in northwestern Eden Prairie, and
WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Planning Commission did hold a public
hearing on the Woodlawn Heights PUD request and did recommend approval
of the Environmental'Assessment Worksheet finding of no significant
impact.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Eden Prairie City Council
that an Environmental Impact Statement is not necessary for Woodlawn
Heights because the project is not a major action which does not have
significant environmental effects and is not more than of local sig-
nificance.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a Negative Declaration Notice shall
be officially filed with the Minnesota Environmental Quality Council.
ADOPTED, this day of , 1982.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
SEAL
Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission Minutes
Unapproved
-1- December 21, 1981
MEMBERS ABSENT: Breitenstein, Schwartz
a. CNR Golden Strip
Don Brauer was present on behalf of Condon-Naegcle. He said
there will be new owners of the property in January, 1982, but
they have the same development objectives as the present owner.
The developer is requesting PUB Concept Plan Approval for 53.74
acres as Regional Office and Preliminary Plat Approval for
63.79 acres into 9 lots and a public road ROW.
Brauer mentioned that 8 acres of the total acreage will be
open space.
Kingrey expressed deep concern that the entire wooded area on
this parcel of land be retained. Brauer shares this concern
and does want to preserve a large portion of the woods.
Lambert noted that the Planning Commission approved the proposed
land use designation (office) and the grading plan for the road
system. However, they denied the specific development plan which
Lambert is also not in favor of.
NOTION: Kingrcy moved to recommend approval of the land use
designation per Planning Staff Report of November 28, 1981,
and approval of preliminary plat for road right of way. Jesscn
seconded the motion. The motion carried with a vote of 4-1
(Anderson opposed).
Unapproved
Planning Commission Minutes
December 14, 1981
MEMBERS ABSENT; Beaman & Retterath
B. CNR GOLDEN STRIP EAST, by Condon-Naegele Realty Co. Request
TO-FWD COnce-pt approval, PUD Development Stage approval,
preliminary platting for 8 office sites and 1 restaurant and
possible variances. Located west of Vikings Winter Park,
north of 1-494, and south of Nine Mile Creek. A continued
public hearing.
The Planner stated that this item has been continued from the 11/23/81 meeting
which was cancelled. He stated that this proposal was before the City in 1980
but had a problem of traffic. He stated that the traffic study has been completed
and the City Council had approved it. Don Brauer, The Brauer Group was present
to give the presentation.
Brauer breifly reviewed the plat and stated that this site is at the centerline ."'
of Nine Mile Creek. He stated that the developer's are selling the project and
have a closing date of 1/18/82. He stated that in 1980, the traffic concerns
were about the access and street connection. He stated that the proponent needs
3 decisions; 1) a zoning land use; 2) establish road patterns for platting; and
3) to plat 1 lot buildable.
The Planner reviewed the staff report dated 11/20/81. He stated that he agreed
with the 2 lots next to the Vikings, having Lot 3, Block 1 remain as is, and
have the rest of the site to remain as an outlot. He stated that he recommends
approval of the office land use, the approval of the road right-of-way and Lots
1 and 2, Block 3 (adjacent to the Vikings site) being platted.
Sutliff asked if the road will continue all the way through to the east and west.
The Planner replied yes.
Marhula asked if it is appropriate to plat Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 prior to rezoning.
The Planner stated that the proponent made a committment at the titne of Vikings
approval for rezoning. Brauer then stated that the proponent realizes that they
will have to return for rezoning.
Torjesen asked if approving the office land use designation constitutes a Guide
Plan Amendment. The Planner stated that he had talked to a Local Assistance
Planner at the Metropolitan Council who checked it out and said the Met. Co.
felt that the office category was interchangable with industrial which would be
permissive.
Sigmund Helle, 2124 Stanford Ave., St. Paul, stated he was representing Mr. Herleiv
Hello, 6138 Artic Way. He asked if the preliminary plat approval is a conoittment
from the proponent to continue the road to Valley View. The Planner replied no,
that the road will be identical to Shady Oak Road. Helle then had questions per-
taining to the road study which was completed and approved. The Planner explained
the approved study.
Marhula asked if the connection of the road to the north is required. The Planner
replied no, that it is to the west.
7-)
Planning ComMission Minutes
Gartner asked about the right-angle turn. Brauer replied that that Was miSdrawn on
the plat and that the angle was approximately 130 rather than 90. He stated that
the turn will meet all safety requirements, etc.
Sutliff asked if Lots 1 and 2, Block 3 could be outlot B. The Planner replied yes.
MOTION 1
Gartner moved to close the public hearing on the PUD Concept Plan and preliminary
plat. Sutliff seconded, motion carried 5-0.
MOTION 2
Gartner moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the office land use
designation but denial of the specific development plan according to the 11/20/81
staff report. Marhula seconded, motion carried 5-0.
MOTION 3
Gartner moved to recommend approval of the preliminary plat dated 10/81, with
the revision that only the road ROW be platted at this time according to the
staff report dated 11/20/81. Block 3 would be platted as one lot as would
Blocks 1 & 2. ROW width and curve radii would be subject to Engineering review
and approval. Marhula seconded, motion carried 5-0.
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
! PROJECT:
Parks. Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Bob Lambert, Director of Community ServiceS
December .18, 1981
Development Proposal Check List
CNR Golden Strip
PROPONEM: Condon-Naegele Realty
REQUEST: PUD Concept Plan Approval for 53.74 acres as Regional Office a
n
d
p
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
Plat approval for 63.79 acres into 9 lots and a public road RO
W
.
LocATI 0,1,Jtorth of I-494,_y_e_51 of viiihingun Avg, . aDd smith of Smetana Lake
BAcKGRom: See Planning Staff Report Dat e d:
.PARE AND RECREATION PLANNING CONCERNS
1. Type of development: Office
. 2. Number of units in residential development: N/A .'
S. Number of acres in the project: 63.79
4. Special recreation space requirements: N/A
S. Adjacent to any existing or proposed parks: Contains proposed dedicated open space adjacent
to Nine-Mile Creek and Smetana Lake.
A. Affect on the park :See Planning Staff Report
6. Need for a mini park:. No
7. Cash park fee or land dedication? Cash Park Fee would be required
a. If Cash park fee dedication, amount based on existing ordinance will
t
o
t
a
l
:
$89,306
b. If park land dedication, the number of acres to be dedicated is
c. Existing or pending assessments or taxes on proposed park property tot
a
l
and will be paid prior to dedication.
8. Adjacent to existing or proposed trails : There are no proposed trails within this project
a. Type of trails N/A
b. Construction Material N/A
c. Width of trail N/A
d. Party responsible for construction
6. Landownership of trail location:(dedicated, purchased. ROW)
N/A
NATURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION CONCERNS
I. Site grading plan considers natural amenities of the site?
The current development plan will
allow unnecessary removal of vegetation and IiiraTtion 01 -1MTOT-151M narms•
2. Most significant grading on the site: a detailed grading plan has not accompanied this
proposal; however, this proposal does indicate a desire to "
r
e
s
h
a
p
e
"
t
h
e
-aominant natur5T-TFaturtTh1 this site.
N/A
3. Significant vegetation on the site includes: See Planning Staff Report pare 3
• •-•••••
4. The site grading plan indicates preservation of N/A
S. Adjacent to public waters: Smetana Lake and Nine-Mi Le Creek
a. Affect on waters: The drainage pattern would be altered and runnoff rate would
increase.
RETERENCE. CHECK
1. Fiajor Center Area Study : See Planning Staff Report
2. Neighborhood Facilities Study : N/A
3, Purgatory Cr( A: Study :N/A
S 4. Shoreland Management Ordinance :ee Planning Staff Report - page 2
S. Floodplain Ordinance : Ste Planning Staff Report -
6. Guide Plan: See Plana:Lag. ataff_Report - Page 1
7. Other :
RECOMENHATIONS
1. Adjacent neighborhood type, and any neighborhood opinion voiced in favor or opposed to the project:
2. Planning Commission Recommendation: On Dec. 14, 1981, the Planning Commission recommended
approval of the office land use designation, but denial of the specific develop-
meat plan according to the recommendations of the Nov. 20 1981 Planning Staff
Report
3. Comm
.
unity Services Staff Rctowlendations: Approval of the office land use designation. but
denial of the specific development plan as per the Planning Staff Report dated
November 20, 1981.
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
FEE OWNER &
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
PROJECT LOCATION:
Planning Commission
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
November 20, 1981
CNR GOLDEN STRIP EAST
Condon-Naegele Realty
Planned Unit Development Concept plan
approval for 53.74 acres as Regional
Office and preliminary plat approval
for 63.79 acres into 9 lots and a
public road ROW.
North and adjacent to 1-494 and west
of Washington Avenue, south of Smetana
Lake and Nine Mile Creek.
BACKGROUND
Incialed with this report is a complete background of the history of past
proposals on this project.
The 1979 Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts this area as office on the western
2/5 of the site and industrial on the eastern 3/5 of the site. The general
approved PUD, which was superceded by the 1979 Comprehensive Guide Plan il-
lustrated this entire PUD as industrial.
Existing Zoning
The 53 acre PUD is rural.
This PUD is the eastern half of the original Condon-Naegele PUD which covered
all of the land north of 1-494 from 169 easterly to Washington Avenue. The
western half of that original PUD has been graded in preparation for auto
dealerships. No additional construction has taken place beyond the grading
from 1975 to this date.
The Minnesota Vikings facility, directly adjacent to Washington Avenue, occurs
at the eastern end of this PUD and was granted zoning and has completed con-
struction of an office building/regional services training facility for the
Minnesota Vikings.
Action was deferred on this PUD in 1980 because of a question of transportation
systems expected in the project. The developer has followed the recommendations
of the City's adopted traffic study for this area and has continued the
frontage road through the property rather than the 2 dead-end cul-de-sacs
previously proposed.
Staff Report-CNR Golden Strip - page 2
The Planning Staff suggests that because of the natural character of this site
with Nine Mile Creek and Smetana Lake on the north portion of it, and the high
exposure to 1-494 south, that regional office land use is compatible with
industrial designation of the Conprehensive Guide Plan and is an appropriate
land use on this site.
TRANSPORTATION
As adbpted in a May, 1981 Smetana Lake Traffic Study, there is a City require-
ment for a continuous frontage road from Washington Avenue through this prop-
erty to proposed Schooner Blvd. The developer has illustrated a continuous
frontage road however, it is being provided with two sharp bends at the west-
ern end of the current PUG. Because of thb high peak hour flow of approximately
600 auto trips during the PM peak, it is highly desirable that this road
geometric be modified to produce a much more gentle set of curves which would
be more easily travelable and create less access problems to it.
The bridge from Washington Avenue south across 1-494 which would recreate full
access to the property, is not currently in any funding plans and no funding
has been identified. Therefore, as stated in the Smetana Lake Traffic Study,
this bridge would be viewed as a last phase segment in the road network
system and would not be expected to be built prior to complete development of
the Smetana Lake area.
NATURAL FEATURES
An Environmental Assessment Worksheet was prepared by the proponent in 1975
on the entire PUG. In that natural feature assessment, it was contemplated
that the entire wooded hill in the very center of the site would be preserved;
it was so represented in the PAW. Although the proponent has improved the
amount of vegetation in the hill that would be retained in this current
proposal by an acre and a half, a'significant portion of the hill is still being
altered and has not been represented in that way in the original PAW.
The Normal Ordinary High Water Mark of Smetana Lake is at elevation 833.3. The
Department of Natural Resources has designated Smetana Lake as a natural
environment lake. The setbacks and criteria for building near a natural
environment lake are listed in Eden Prairie's Ord. #80-25 (Shoreland Management
Ordinance). Minimum lot size for lots abutting a natural environment lake
of an office land use are 10 acres with a minimum width at building line of
200% andnimum setback of 200' from the Normal Ordinary High Water Mark.
The officebuilaings proposed are under the minimum lot size but appear to
adhere to the setback from the Normal Ordinary High Water Mark. Criteria
for commercial buildings is identical to office buildings and would put the
regional restaurant at the very western end of the project in conflict with
the Shoreland Management Ordinance both in terms of lot size and setback from
the Normal Ordinary High Water Mark,
Floodplain
The floodplain for Smetana Lake is at the 841 elevation. The two buildings
proposed on the very western end of the project on Block 1, Lots 3 and 4, are
both proposed within the floodplain. The office buildings on Block 2, Lots
1 and 2 are also proposed within the floodplain and require fill within the
floodplain.
Staff Report-CNR Golden Strip ' page 3
Topcmally & Vegetation
The site is very steeply rolling and predominantly occupied
b
y
o
a
k
w
o
o
d
s
.
T
h
e
low point of the Site is at Smetana Lake of 833.8 rising sha
r
p
l
y
t
o
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
to a set of knolls ranging from 852 to 861. The site contin
u
e
s
t
o
r
i
s
e
to the center of the project to the set of twin knolls; one
a
t
8
8
0
.
7
a
n
d
a
very high steep knoll at 933.0. The total site elevation di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
t
h
e
n
i
s
100'. Vegetation on the site can be described from an inven
t
o
r
y
t
a
k
e
n
b
y
t
h
e
City Forester in November of this year and is given as follo
w
s
:
On September 19, 1981 I visited the Condon-Naegele Realty property to
ascertain and define the major tree cover types on the PUD
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
proposal. I divided the area (ee attached) into 6 differen
t
t
r
e
e
z
o
n
e
s
a
n
d
found them to contain the following:
Area A:
Approximately 1.8 acres. The trees in this area are large m
a
t
u
r
e
w
h
i
t
e
oaks (Quercus alba), many 24" in diameter. The trees are w
i
d
e
l
y
s
c
a
t
t
e
r
e
d
forming an uneven canopy. The understory is dense brush co
m
p
o
s
e
d
o
f
p
r
i
c
k
l
y
ash, small elms, buckthorn, and black cherry.
Area B:
Approximately 1.4 acres. Major trees in this area are medi
u
m
(
1
8
"
-
2
4
"
)
s
i
z
e
d
red and white (Quercus ruba and Quercus alba) oak trees. U
n
d
e
r
b
r
u
s
h
i
n
this is similar in size and composition and density as Area
A
.
Area C:
Approximately 4.8 acres. This area contains the highest elev
a
t
i
o
n
p
o
i
n
t
o
f
the site. The major tree cover type is white oak (Quercus a
l
b
a
)
.
T
h
e
white oaks are from 18-24" in diameter and represent 90% of
t
h
e
t
o
t
a
l
t
r
e
e
cover of this area. The trees represent an "even age stand"
m
e
a
n
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
these trees are relatively close in grow age. I would estim
a
t
e
t
h
e
a
g
e
s
o
f
these trees to be approximately 90-120 years. (The life exp
e
c
t
a
n
c
y
f
o
r
a
white oak is 250-300 years).
The associated species of trees in this area are basswood (l
i
n
d
e
n
)
,
b
l
a
c
k
cherry and ironwood. This wooded area represents a climax f
o
r
e
s
t
m
e
a
n
i
n
g
that it has developed over several hundred years and will be
s
e
l
f
p
e
r
-
petuating if undisturbed.
This area contains the most significant trees of the entire
s
i
t
e
.
Area 0:
Approximate size - 2.3 acres. This area contains 85-90Z ba
s
s
w
o
o
d
t
r
e
e
s
ranging in size from 10-14" in diameter. The size and dens
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
trees is representative of an area that has been logged (40
-
5
0
y
e
a
r
s
a
g
o
)
and the trees (originally understory trees) have begun to f
i
l
l
i
n
t
h
e
clearing.
The area also contains a few large scattered white oaks
and red oaks which
were not cut in the logging.
73
Staff Report-CUR Golden Strip
page 4
Area E:
Approximate-size 6.0 acres. The tree cover is very similar in characteristic
to Area C however, this area contains a mixture of red oak (Quercus alba).
The trees are generally 18-24" in diameter with an approximate range in
ages of 75-120 years. This area is also a climax forest with a life expectancy
of 250-300 years.
The southern fringe of this area contains small elm, aspen, and birch
6-12'. (see map)
Area F:
Approximate-size 8 acres. This area contains the largest variety of overstory
trees of the entire site. The largest trees are scattered red oak which ,
are 30-36.0 in diameter. These trees are approximately 150-200 years old.
Mixed in with these oaks are elms, aspen, cottonwoed, and black cherry.
The majority of elm trees in this area are diseased With .Dutch Elm disease
(DED) or have died from DED. This area is in transition and does not appear
to have a dominant tree species. This area has the 'lowest value' tree Over
on it.
Diesease and Insect Evaluation
It is difficult to make a complete evaluation of all disease and insect
problems during this time of the year. I looked for signs of oak wilt
disease and did not find any areas that would represent an infection
center. I also checked the tree inspection records of the past 4 years and
found no reports of suspected oak wilt.
Submitted by Stuart Fox, Tree Inspector. .
"IN
••••••• ..•n• , GOLDEN STRIP PROPERTY Mass Grading Fig. b condon-naeg;ele rea:tv CO. brauw assoc. ltd., inc..plannfars ! •
Staff Report-CNR Golden Strip page 5
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The request of the development plan is two-fold; 1) approval of a preliminary
plat which would allow parcelling of the property for sale purposes; and 2)
approval of concept development plan that would allow grading of the site in
general conformance with the mass grading plan submitted and labelled figure
B.
All development proposed on this site at this time is speculative in nature.
Because of the very high quality and high visibility of this site, both from
Nine Mile Creek and from 1-494 and its value as a City wide amenity and doorway
to Eden Prairie, and because of consistency of review of development projects
of a speculative nature impacting significant natural resources, it is in-
conceivable and 'iladvised to adept this development plan which would allow
grading to this degree without specific plans of actual users of the property.
A case in point, is the Minnesota Vikings training facility, which has been
featured in Minnesota Architecture Magazine. The Planning Comnission is aware
that the majority of the vegetation cf significance and land forms of signi-
ficance on the Minnesota Vikings site were preserved and the actual amenity
of the site itself was a major determining factor in the Vikings locating at
this site. To destroy sites of higher natural quality then the Minnesota
Vikings site would be to destroy nIch of the desirability of the site for
high — quality corporate users. Therefore, although the developer is not
proposing to grade the site at this tine, he is asking approval for a develop-
ment plan which would ultimately alter beyond recognition the site as it
exists today. The proponent has provided plans which illustrate the develop-
ment plans for the site which makes no attempt to work with the majority of
the natural land form of the site and removes most of the significant Oak
vegetation of the site.
Gelcos Corporate Headquarters is an example of a development that can be located
within a woods Even though a majority of the mods in the Gelco site plan
was removed, enough of the peripherial woods was retained to enhance the
ultimate development of the office project.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the office designation land
use for this property subject to the following conditions:
1. The preliminary plat should not he approved at this time because the lot
lines are drawn anticipating a development similar to the current develop-
ment plan.
2. The current development plan should not be approved because of its severe
impact on the natural features of the site and because of the speculative
nature and unnecessary contemplation of removal of vegetation and alter-
ation of land form.
3. The mass grading plan should not be approved as submitted because of its
severe impact on the vegetation and land forms of the site.
Staff Report-CNR Golden Strip .
page
4. The east/west through road should be modified to rel
a
x
t
h
e
t
w
o
n
i
n
e
t
y
degree bends which would slow traffic and create tra
f
f
i
c
c
o
n
g
e
s
t
i
o
n
.
5. Any individual site grading approvals or site plan
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
subject to specific review of specific site plans a
n
d
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
s
submitted as a part of a preliminary plat and rezon
i
n
g
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
for actual structures.
CE:ss
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
PROJECT:
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
REFER TO:
Planning Comission
Jean Johnson, Assistant Planner
September 18, 1980
CNR GOLDEN STRIP EAST PUD
Resubmission for PUD Concept approval
North of 494, South of Nine Mile Creek & West of
Viking.; Center
February 20, 1980 staff report
March 10, 1980 State Highway letter
EQC approved plan, 12/9/75
V
BACKGROUND
fri—FebrUY, 1980 an application for: PUB Concept uses of office and office dis-
tribution, preliminary plat approval, and rezoning from Industrial & Rural to
Office for the eastern 15 acres (11 of which is presently being developed for the
Vikings Center), was received.
In March the Planning Commission acted upon the requests as follows:
"Motion: Bentley moved, Levitt seconded to recomriend the City Council
refer the PUD concept request back to the_proppnent for revision,
gErusfve of the eastern 15 acres as outlined in the stilf—TEPort
dated 2/2/80. Motion carried 4-0.
Motion: Bentley moved, Gartner seconded to recommend to the City
Council approval of the rezoning from Rural & 1-2 Park to Office for
15 acres according to the material dated February 20, 1980 and the
staff report dated February 20, 1930 provided that the Public Safety
Department submit their opinion of lengthy cul-de-sacs and that de-
tailed grading plans be submitted prior to City Council review.
Motion: Bentley moved, Levitt seconded to recommend to the City
Council approval of the preliminary plat dated February 20,.1980
according to the staff report dated February 20, 1980 provided that the
Public Safety Department submit their opinion of lengthy cul-de-sacs
and that detailed grading plans be submitted prior to City Council
review. Motion carried 4-0."
The Council approved first phase development and the PUB Concept was returned
for revisions as noted in the staff report.
The applicant has now revised the PUD Concept and desires City approval of same.
v
Staff Report--CNR Golden Strip E. -2- September 18, 1980
I STAFF/COMMSSION SUGGESTED REVISIONS: I
"1. The original 1975 submission for PUD a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
C
o
n
d
o
n
-
N
a
e
g
e
l
e
'
s
entire 165 acre parcel illustrated a road t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
from C.S.A.H. #18 to U.S. 169. Since much
o
f
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
7
3
a
c
r
e
eastern half of the original PUD is now bei
n
g
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
f
o
r
o
f
f
i
c
e
use, and since in the future there will be
'
i
n
-
o
n
l
y
"
a
c
c
e
s
s
f
r
o
m
Co. Rd. #18, it is critical that this road
b
e
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
.
Without this through connection, developme
n
t
a
n
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
c
i
r
c
u
l
-
ation may be hampered for years by two half
m
i
l
e
l
o
n
g
c
u
l
-
d
e
-
s
a
c
s
.
An analogous situation would be cul-de-sac
i
n
g
W
e
s
t
7
8
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
from both directions in front of Gelco on
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
1
-
4
9
4
.
A connection north across Nine Mile Creek
t
o
a
f
u
t
u
r
e
V
a
l
l
e
y
V
i
e
w
Road and a connection south across 1-494 to
W
e
s
t
7
8
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
w
i
l
l
still be valuable to the total transportati
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
b
u
t
d
o
e
s
n
o
t
eliminate the logical connection from east
t
o
w
e
s
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
o
n
d
o
n
-
Naegele property.
2. The original PUD and Environmental Assessme
n
t
W
o
r
k
s
h
e
e
t
s
h
o
w
e
d
Lots 10 & 11 as being preserved,
"The second area of preservation (the first
b
e
i
n
g
t
h
e
flood plain and adjacent slopes) will be th
e
a
p
p
r
o
x
-
imate 8 acre forested hill in the center o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
This hill is of great scenic beauty and con
t
a
i
n
s
a
n
oak overstory with a basswood understory.
I
t
i
s
basically undisturbed forest of a caliber i
n
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
l
y
rare in the Metro Area. This area will rem
a
i
n
i
n
t
h
e
ownership of CNR as a Rural Outlot". (page
3
9
C
o
n
d
o
n
-
Naegele Realty Company Environmental Asses
s
m
e
n
t
W
o
r
k
-
sheet)
The Planning Staff believes that this is st
i
l
l
a
v
a
l
u
a
b
l
e
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
amenity of the site but that the current PU
D
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
p
l
a
n
s
e
l
i
m
i
n
-
ation of this woods and hill form rather th
a
n
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
i
t
.
The road system and parcel ization should b
e
r
e
d
o
n
e
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
allow this to occur as a preserved amenity
a
s
a
p
a
r
t
o
f
a
l
a
r
g
e
r
office site.
3. The retention of two office warehouse sit
e
s
s
e
e
m
s
i
n
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
with the high quality character of office
p
a
r
k
t
h
a
t
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
h
a
s
the potential to be."
ISTATE/WIGHWAY DEPAR1MLNT RESPONSE]
After Planning Commission action,
I. . following response relative to the east
/
w
e
s
t
frontage road was received:
"In regard to the frontage road shown on t
h
e
n
l
a
t
,
w
e
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
t
h
a
t
i
t
be constructed westerly to the proposed Ring Rood interchange. This
would greatly improve traffic circulation
i
n
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
"
(
3
/
1
0
/
U
0
l
e
t
t
e
r
)
g9
•;-
Staff Report--CNR Golden Strip E. -3- September 18, 1980
FUSED SEPTEMBER, 1980 PUD PLAN'S CONFORMANCE TO SUGG
E
S
T
E
D
R
E
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
:
I
1. Roadway .
The proposed PUD plan depicts a combination of tempo
r
a
r
y
c
u
l
-
d
e
-
s
a
c
s
and a North/South connecting road over 494 as an alt
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
t
o
t
h
e
original East/West connection depicted in the E.A.W.
a
n
d
1
9
7
5
P
U
D
.
2. Forested Hill
The proposed PUP depicts •a lot line through the cent
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
top of the hill with division of the 84. acres into l
o
t
s
1
1
&
1
2
.
This does not conform to the approved E.A.W., the 19
7
5
s
u
b
m
i
t
-
ted plan, or the Staff/City recommendations of Febru
a
r
y
2
0
,
1
9
8
0
.
3. Office - Warehouse Uses
The proposed PUD does eliminate the office - warehou
s
e
u
s
e
s
w
h
i
c
h
were incompatible with the quality office sites.
STAFF REVIEW OF REVISED POD 1
1. Roadwai
The network of roadway has far reaching implication
s
a
n
d
a
f
f
e
c
t
s
State, County and City systems. A clear alternativ
e
w
h
i
c
h
w
o
u
l
d
satisfy all parties involved has not been arrived at
.
I
t
i
s
s
u
g
-
gested that input from other affected landowners be r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
p
r
i
o
r
to approving a concept.
2. Forested Hill
The schematic platting depicted on the revised PUD do
e
s
n
o
t
p
r
e
-
serve this 8 acre parcel. The hill is divided by a l
o
t
l
i
n
e
and no preservation documents are included.
. The Planning Staff still feels, as outlined in the
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
'
s
E.A.W., that this site is a valuable amenity to pres
e
r
v
e
f
o
r
the character of the development and for the City.
3. Office - Warehouse Uses
The revised PUD does eliminate the previously propos
e
d
o
f
f
i
c
e
/
warehouse lots which were incompatible to the high q
u
a
l
i
t
y
office sites on adjoining lots.
qo
Staff Report--CNR Golden Strip E. -4 - September 18, 1980
CONCLUSIONS
•
The Staff recommends returning the PUD to the proponent and contin
u
i
n
g
t
h
e
i
t
e
m
for the following reasons:
1. To allow participation from affected landowners as to the
underpass/overpass of 494.
2. For revision of the road and platting depicted to:
a. Preserve the wooded hill feature of -the
proposal.
b. More clearly define the east/west connection,
from the Ring Road to Co. Rd. 18, as previously
recommended by staff and highway department.
JJ:ss
91
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET CNR PLAN .pud concept & rezoning t(9.RC:-*.f.g.";>1-r
\ ,1 /2.-• I /,/ e,, - ' e • -- I LEGEND erralt 1-reee,e, see. eeeennlesr-1-21.22 1 200.21.027-Iteeneele 3.220221.32230-ee At. • t r 104010 tiet.ec ro7A--,Alle•2222wer....." ac 1-71-22820222101e-et. r-1.-Preit 2-nes •2 3.3113S 2000WAT-ser se. =n-r-Locorws argcroAvarcorr•ce CXR - GOLDEN STRP/7AST Brauer & Associates Ltd., Inc. Alternate U-Phasing ADDENDUM Auo,.1980 FIG.3a 0 100 300 (Underpass)
9g
.. /I n o.ii nadir Entrki.yer
Evan R. Green
Project Manager
ERC:bn
,oxscpt,
oi -71-:s Minnesota
Department of Transportation
District Five
rcf 5801 Duluth Street
oF-70 Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
March 10, 1980
Mr. Chris Eager ••
Planning Director
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
S.P. 2785-188 TEl 494 .
Review of proposed Viking Office and
Training Facility, located in the NW quadrant
of TH 494 and Washington Avenue South
in Eden Prairie
Dear Mr. Enger:
We have reviflwed the above referenced develop
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
o
f
f
e
r
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
comments for consideration.
- As you know, we are presently designing cha
n
g
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
I
-
4
9
4
-
C
S
A
H
1
8
• interchange area. These changes include revisi
o
n
s
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
Avenue in the area of the proposed access to
t
h
i
s
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
O
u
r
Detail designer has submitted copies of our pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
p
l
a
n
s
t
o
y
o
u
r
C
i
t
y
Engineer. Any proposed entrance should be des
i
g
n
e
d
s
o
t
h
a
t
i
t
i
s
compatible with our future changes.
In regard to the frontage road shown on the p
l
a
t
,
w
e
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
t
h
a
t
i
t
b
e
constructed westerly to the proposed Ring Roa
d
i
n
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
.
T
h
i
s
w
o
u
l
d
greatly improve traffic circulation in the ar
e
a
.
If any construction for the proposed frontage roa
d
e
n
c
r
o
a
c
h
e
s
u
p
o
n
o
u
r
right of way, the developer must obtain a per
m
i
t
f
r
o
m
o
u
r
G
o
l
d
e
n
V
a
l
l
e
y
office before any construction can take place
.
If you have any questions in regard to these c
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
,
p
l
e
a
s
e
f
e
e
l
f
r
e
e
to
contact me at 545-3761 ext. 119. Thank you fo
r
y
o
u
r
c
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
Sincerely,
OW 54 5.37G1
As noted in fig. 2 below, the 72.9 acres are presently located in C-Reg,
Rural and 1-2 Districts. The eastern 11 acres to be zoned to office is
presently zoned 1-2 and Rural.
\\"
loomar.0011
77:--'''''.
..., - .....+. _.. ..-:-
k\\
I A
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
PROJECT:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Chris Enger, Planning Director
Jean Johnson, Assistant Planner
Feb. 20, 1980
CNR-GOLDEN STRIP EAST PUD & VIKING REZONING
Condon-Naegele Realty Company
1. PUD Concept Plan Approval on 72.9 acres for
Office and regional commercial uses
2. Rezoning of 15 acres from Rural & 1-2 to Office
for an office and athletic training facility
for the Minnesota Vikings
3. Preliminary plat approval of 2 lots.
BACKGROUND
Comprehensive Guide Plan
The Guide Plan illustrates office, industrial, and public uses over the
72.9 acre site. Industrial is illustrated for the 15 acre piece reque
s
t
i
n
g
rezoning to office at this time.
FIG. 1
FIG. 2
Zoning
-.-Rc----/e7 (-11,--,i -- ,. ----;-
ArmARC., 1 \i'-- i ,..,.
. • , :
. :eic,eti\
• ,...:3"."` >(.0;.;r./.•ll,:////1
••..!t ,•.
...':•-'-;•:-'••:' :. _.-. k"
i:i (-•..-•'''::;Z:'"'- ... - '
,1 ••• , ' • • . •
• •
SW) S$1.7 rONCSSI
r,
0.11 Walk
041
Swot . 1 n•
4aff Report-CNR PUD & %.tking Rezoning .2-
C7;
Feb.20.1980
BACKGROUND, continued
Major Center Area Plan, 1973
The MCA Plan depicts 2 multiple housing locations and highway commercial/
regional services uses. The current Guide Plan uses of office and industri
a
l
override the 1973 proposed uses of multiple family housing contained in th
e
. MCA Plan.
Smetana Lake Plan , 1974
The 1974 Smetana Lake Plan describes this area as suitable for industrial
a
n
d
/
o
r
office uses with density trade off possible if "the . scenic forested sloping
.areas and flood plain " are preserved.
Condon-Nallgele PUD, 1975-76
This PUD submitted in 1975, and approved in 1976 , gave PUD approval for
restaurant, hotel and highway service uses,( this included 4 auto dealers
h
i
p
s
along 1-494) over the western portion of the 165 acre PUD.
The remainder of the CNR property ( area lying east of drainage swale, se
e
f
i
g
.
3
)
,
was returned to the developer for refinement.
Subsequent rezoning action approved the rezoning to C-Reg-Ser for 24 acres.
Although the City's current Zoning Map illustrates C-Reg zoning on the 25 a
c
r
e
s
west of the proposed Schooner Boulevard, this is a technical error due to
a
n
inaccurate legal description. The Council's motion and the proponent's req
u
e
s
t
clearly reflects zoning for the auto dealership sites only.
In 1977 the CNR final plat for the western portion of their property along
1
-
4
9
4
was approved . The plat contained 3 lots and 6 outlots; two of the cnitlots
w
e
r
e
.
dedicated to the City for ramp right-of-way and one outlot
was deeded to the City for park and conservancy purposes. The plat name as
filed is "Golden Strip".
'toticu tuna znitNo
Will.
•WWWW. a. 111. W et
w W.
n A4
A A.
A ...
A ..
A ..,
1 . ri
Staff Report-CNR PUD & Viking Rezoning -3 -
Feb. 20,1980
EXISTING SITE CHARACTER
So il s
As noted on page 7 of the development brochure and
v
e
r
i
f
i
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
s
o
i
l
b
o
r
i
n
g
s
,
the Heyder and Hayden Soils dominating the site ar
e
s
u
i
t
a
b
l
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
of office type buildings as outlined by the propon
e
n
t
.
Topography •
The site is gently rolling with wooded hills risin
g
i
n
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
-
c
e
n
t
r
a
l
and hortheast portions of the site.
The site has been previously graded to accommodate
a
s
e
w
e
r
t
r
u
n
k
l
i
n
e
and an access road which meanders through the Con
d
o
n
-
N
a
e
g
e
l
e
W
e
s
t
P
U
D
and the proposed East PUD. (see Figure 4 )
Vegetation
Besides cattail and bullrush being located along
t
h
e
m
a
r
s
h
l
a
n
d
a
n
d
c
r
e
e
k
,
they have also appeared around the sedimentation
p
o
n
d
b
u
i
l
t
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
the sewer trunk line.
The most dominate vegetative feature, as noted in
t
h
e
b
r
o
c
h
u
r
e
,
a
r
e
t
h
e
stands of mature red and white oak trees. Preserv
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
o
a
k
stands was included in the 1975 PUD, ( see Figure 4 ) in a Rural classifica-
tion. This Rural piece was proposed to be retained by the
o
w
n
e
r
.
The
present plan depicts little retention of the oaks
a
n
d
p
l
a
t
t
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
R
u
r
a
l
piece into Lots 10 & 11 (see figure 5).
Site Plan: Transportation
The original 1975 CNR Plan illustrated a road from
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
west to US 169/212. This road was not approved bec
a
u
s
e
o
f
a
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
swab e occurring near the center of the site. However,
w
i
t
h
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
of the auto dealership pads, sedimentation ponds,
s
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
s
e
w
e
r
l
i
n
e
,
and removal of Dutch Elm diseased trees, this is no longer a vaild factor.
E.A.W.
AlWcontained in the original E.A.W. is the prese
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
w
o
o
d
e
d
hill area now depicted for development in the 1980
P
l
a
n
a
s
L
o
t
s
1
0
a
n
d
11.
(V1
•rr A P P R O VE D 1 9 7 5 PLAN LT. I r t 00• ' LAND -USE CONCEPT 'ONNG la 21, ACRES ca.rm. REG. SUM 2494 3.7.•E CarSICE 23 47 I-2 2934 77,24.0 7CTA2. mato REOUUT 12_42 72.3300 72.1.24 • ". - • .4-r. , (.77 I I:• pud concept & rezoning @WAY-111-&-15-21;,-9 1.001.1C CC•497E11.7.4.-11.3. 0776r, COU.Er10.4.1.-77CH77•Y OrFICE 4- 0700970,1-2 STREET & 19G+1WAY MAW. 12.37ACRES 240a 25. 23.47 32.90 20.24 • &TES • 2 3 10 n.n• 109.72 K0)11-16,1 1:-'91,1 3 ? , -vr,,, * c's..‘N‘A,,,\'• , I,..\\:`..\ \ NV\ ......-..7,_,,-..7„,,___________:.....„,:,.,7...,:_t_. ...L.____-)x,,,,i,.\\,.., 1._...,. 5 : n . r• — -: Ii y,-,-,-,-'-',, ,,,- ---.n---7,.,,:.-t-:-:,-•?--,7 , - -1;7)::5-- 77-1:1J7--7-72- :L.7--__'7,-:..n_',_::1-1`,,,l:.,-...:',,'t'' ,:..t.itt.i':'.. ,i'lg: :.-- j 9:,-77( 'r/Ii'ill 71----------------'—\--''' ''--- --------- -----77:------ ___ --......---4.-,—. - ITZT73-r-r2T . . ZSZX:=7.0
NR-- GCLDEN STR1P/EAST Brauer & Associates Ltd., ir .
(44
Staff Report-CNR PUD & Viking Rezoning -4 - Feb.20,1980
Surrounding Land Uses
On the north portion of the PUD is an overhead transmission line and Nine Mile
C
r
e
e
k
.
North of Nine Mile Creek are scattered residential homes and mining pits
which are foreseen as future industrial and high density residential areas.
• Directly south of the PUD, across 1-494, is the Bachman Anderson Office site
which is currently under construction. To the west of this office site is
the Gelco corporation which presently includes 1 existing office structure,
1 office structure under construction, and future building plans for 3 additi
o
n
a
l
buildings.
East of the PUD, across Washington Avenue, is the City of Bloomington. Present
l
y
a small number of residential homes exist along Washington Avenue, but the
future intended use according to Bloomington's Guide Plan is for office develo
p
-
ment.
West of the proposed CNR East PUD proposed is the approved 1975-76 PUD
by Condon-Naegele as described on page 2 of this report.
ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
Shoreland Management Ordinance
Smetana Lake is classified as - Recreational Waters. Nine Mile Creek is General
Development Waters. Requirements for both are listed below.
Recreational Waters General Dev„Waters
a. Lots must have public sewer. a. Lots mia- have public s ewer.
b. 10 acre minimum lot size. b. 40,000 sq.ft. minimum lot size..
c. 200 foot minimum setback from the c. 150 foot minimum setbacl from the
Normal Ordinary High Water Mark, Normal Ordinary High Water Mark.
The proposed Viking Office and training facility meets the above
requirements.
ORDINANCE 135: Office District
minimum lot width 100 feet
minimum lot depth 100 feet
front yard setback 35 feet
rear yard setback 20 feet
side setbacks 20:50 feet
maximum height of structure 30 feet
F.A.R. 30% for 1 story
50% for multiple story
parking- 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet
G.F.A.
I •
100
(
Staff Report-CNR PUD & Rezoning -5 - Feb. 20,1980
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
The Minnesota Environmental Quality Council at a December, 1975 meeting
reviewed a E.A.W. on the CNR 165 acre development and determined that
an Environmental Impact Statement(E.I.S.) was not required. Therefore,
no additional E.A.W. is mandatory unless uses contrary to those contained
in the 1975 E.A.W. are proposed or unless environmental effects, other
than those covered in the E.A.W.,are discovered.
The 15 acre site requesting rezoning to Office was depicted in the 1975
.E.A.W. as industrial lots ranging from 2-3 acres in size. The praposed
Viking Office and training facility would be expected to have less impact
upon the site and surrounding facilities than 3-4 industrial sites
would have produced.
CASH PARK FEE
The City approval of the 1975 CNR Western PUD & rezoning accepted land in lieu of
cash park fee payment.
Since the early days of the City's cash park fee ordinance in 1975, a
subsequent ordinance (78-229) has been adopted and is applicable to this
project.
•
The CUR Golden Strip East PUD offers 5.2 acres of land ,(located between
the centerline of Nine Mile Creek and the 100 year flood plain elevation
of 833),for dedication to the City. This dedication is acceptable to
the City but does not constitute land in lieu of cash park fee payment
as it occurs within a flood plain. Therefore, the owner may retain the
flood plain portion in his ownership, or dedicate the land to the City
in the form of a charitible donation(gift).
First phase development of the CUR East PUD, the Viking rezoning&adjacent 4 acres,
will be subject to cash park fee payment at time of building permit
issuance. Presently, the amount applicable to office uses is $1,400
per acre.
(el
Staff Report-CNR E.PUD & Viking Rezoning .-6 -
Feb. 20, 1980
RECOMMENDATIONS
The staff recommends approval of the rezoning to Office District and preliminary
plat approval of two lots on the 15acres subject to the following:
1. The plan be reviewed and approved by the Nine Mile Watershed District.
2. The public road be built according to City Engineering standards
to the property's western boundary.
3. The plan be according to the specific site plans submitted and
dated Feb. 15, 1980.
4. Any substantial change in the site plan of either Lot 1 or Lot 2
be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission.
5. The area shown as preservation on Fig. 10 of the development brochure (2-80),
Fig.5 of report , be protected from any grading or construction.
6. That grading be limited to Lots 1,2,and 3 until further approvals.
7. That cash park fee payment of $1,400/acre be paid at time of
building permit issuance.
The staff recommends returning the PUD Concept, exclusive of the eastern
15 acres, to the proponent for the following revisions:
1. The original 1975 submission for PUD approval of Condon-Naegele's
entire 165 acre parcel illustrated a road through the property from
C.S.A.H.t18 to U.S. 169. Since much of the current 73 acre eastern
half of the original PUD is now being requested for office use,
and since in the future there will be "in-only" access from Co.Rd.t18,
it is critical that this road be continued through. Without this
through connection , development and traffic circulation may be hampered
for years by two half mile long cul-de-sacs.
An analagous situation would be cul-de-sacing West 78th Street from
both directions in front of Gelco on the south side of 1-494.
A connection north across Nine Mile Creek to a future Valley View Road
and a connection south across 1-494 to West 78th Street will still be
valuable to the total transportation system but does not eliminate the
logical connection from east to west of the Condon-Naegele property.
2. The original PUD and Environmental Assessment Worksheet showed Lots
10 & 11 as being preserved.
"The second area of preservation (the first being the
flood plain and adjacent slopes) will be the approxi-
mate 8 acre forested hill in the center of the project.
10a
Staff Report-CNR E. PhD & Viking Rezoning -7- Feb. 20, 1980
The hill is of great scenic beauty and contains an
oak overstory with a basswood understory. It is
basically undisturbed forest of a caliber increasingl
y
rare in the Metro Area. This area will remain in th
e
ownership of CNR as a Rural outlot".( page 39 Condon
Naegele Realty Company Environmental Assessment
Worksheet)
The Planning Staff believes that this is still a va
l
u
a
b
l
e
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
a
m
e
n
i
t
y
of the site but that the current PhD proposal plans e
l
i
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
i
s
woods and hill form rather than preservation of it
.
T
h
e
r
o
a
d
s
y
s
t
e
m
a
n
d
parcelization should be redone in order to allow this
t
o
o
c
c
u
r
a
s
a
preserved amenity as a part of a larger office site.
3. The retention of two office warehouse sites seems incompatible with
t
h
e
high quality character of office park that this area
h
a
s
t
h
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
to be.
CE:jj
io3
.014C)&
Minnesota
p. Department of Transportation 4
1Y District 5
— 4., 2055 No. Lilac Drive
,CA
oFTBW - Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422.
December 8, 1981
(612) 545.3761
Hr. Chris Enger
Planning Director
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
In Reply Refer To: 315
S.P. 2785 T.H. 494
Plat review of CNR Golden Strip East Revised
located North of 494 approximately 4000' to
1000' West of Washington Ave. in part of the
SW 1/4 and the SE 1/4 of Section 12 and the
NW 1/4 and the NE 1/4 of Section 13,
Township 116, Range 22 in the City of
Eden Prairie, Hennepin County
Dear Mr. Eager:
We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. We find the
plat acceptable for further development with consideration of the following
comment:
- The grading plan submitted with this plat indicates work within the
highway right of way. A permit must be applied for and approved before
any work in begun within the highway right of way. The permit could
take a substantial amount of time to process as we will have to have
it approved by the Federal Highway Administration.
If you have any questions in regard to this comment, please contact our
Layout, Research and Development Engineer Mr. J. S. Katz at 545-3761 ext.
150. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sine
Craw rd;
District Engineer 7)
cc: Charles Weaver
Metropolitan Council
Mike Reiter
Hennepin County Surveyor's Office
An Equal Opportunity Employer
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 82-10
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CNR GOLDEN STRIP
EAST PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND AMENDING
THE GUIDE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of Ordinance 135
provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas
located within the City, and
WHEREAS, the CNR Golden Strip East PUD is considered a proper amend-
ment to the 1979 Comprehensive Guide Plan, and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on
CNR's Planned Unit Development request for approval for office, commercial,
and open space uses, and recommended approval of the PUD Concept to the
City Council, and
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request On Jan. 5, 1982.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The CNR Golden Strip East PUD, being in Hennepin County,
Minnesota, and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A,
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD approval as outlined in
the application material dated October, 1981.
3. That the PhD meet the recomuendations of the Planning Com-
mission dated December 14, 1981.
ADOPTED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie this
day of
, 1982.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Irene, City Clerk
SEAL
I OS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CNIIKCIAEN -SIR.IP—EA -ST PUD
,
(PHASE 2 AND 3)
All that part of the SW 1/4 and the SE of Section 12 and the
NW I/4 and the NE 1)4 of Section 13; Township 116, Range 22,
Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows:
Commencing at the north quarter corner of Section 13,
Township 116, Range 22; thence south 03° 09' 15" east 923.29
feet to the north right of way line of Highway 494 and the
actual point of beginning;
Thence north 86° 37' 58" west along said right of way,
116.85 feet; thence south 85° 59' 30" west along said line
100.00 feet; thence south 77° 27' 40" west along said line
101.12 feet; thence south 85° 59' 30" west along said line
20.27 feet, more or less to the southeast corner of Lot 3,
Block 1, Golden Strip Plat; thence north 03° 08' 28" west
along the easterly line of outlot "C" of said plat 82.12 feet;
thence north 40°.36' 20" west along said line 316.87 feet;
thence north 13° 09' 19" west along said line 640.00 feet,
more or less to the north line of the NW 1/4 of Section 13;
thence north 89° 59' 17" west along said north line 126.83
feet more or less to the intersection with the centerline of
the South Fork Nine Mile Creek; thence along the centerline
of said creek meandering northeasterly to the intersection
with the east line of the SW 1/4 of the SW IA of Section 12;
thence south 02° 30 east along said east line to the south-
east corner of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 12; thence
north 88° 04' 00" east along the north line of the NE 114,
Section 13, 385.45 feet; thence south 02° 10' 30" east 862.38
feet more or less to the north right of way of Highway 494;
thence south 85° 59' 30" west along said line 1,676.67 feet
more or less to the point of beginning.
And, lot 3, Block 1 of Golden Strip
. Exhibit A
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 82-11 .
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF CNR GOLDEN STRIP EAST
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of CNR Golden Strip East
dated
Oct., 1981 , a copy of which is on file at the City Hall
and amended as follows:
is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie
Zoning and Platting ordinances and amendments thereto and is herein
approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of
19 .
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
John D. Frane, City Clerk
SEAL
9826
9827
9828
9829
9830
9831
9832
9833
9834
9835
9836
9837
9838
9839
9840
9841
9842
9843
9844 96(
98 ,16
9847
9848
9849
9850
9851
9852
9853
9854
9855
9856
9857
9358
9859
9860
9861
9862
ORRIN ALT
RONALD ANDERSON
V. JAMES BERGSTROM
BILL BLAKE
BRIAN BLANCH
MICHAEL BOSACKER
LANCE BRACE
LESLIE BRIDGER
THOMAS BROWN
JAMES CLARK
JOHN CONLEY
JOYCE CONLEY
ANNETTE CUMMINGS
JOHN K. HACKING
DONNA HYATT
ALLEN LARSON
PHILIP MATH1OWETZ
JAMES MATSON
MARY BETH MILLER
CURTIS ODERLANDER
PAULINE OLSON
DENNIS PAULSON
RICK RABENORT
NANCE RILEY
LAURA ROELL
JOHN SORENSEN
KEITH WALL
ACRO-MINNESOTA, INC.
AEROBIC DANCING, INC.
AEROBIC DYNAMICS
STUART ALEXANDER
ALLIS-CHALMERS
ARNIE AMRHEIM
ARMOR SECURITY, INC.
ARTSIGN MATERIALS CO.
AUTO TRAAC
B R W
9863 BRIAN BERGSTROM
9864 BLOOMINGTON LOCKSMITH CO.
9865 BORCHERT-INGERSOLL, INC.
9866 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC.
January 5, 1982
TAT( 1F MINNESOTA
:ITY'vF EDEN PRAIRIE
SOUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows:
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Uniform Allowance
Office Supplies
Instructor-Aerobic Dancing
Instructor-Aerobic Dance
Mileage
24" Valve-Water Plant
Fee-Street Maintenance
Repair locks-Park Dept.
Tape-Park Planning
Speed Tests-Public Safety Dept.
Service-Eden Road, Mitchell Road & 14.78th St.,
Valley View Rd., Schooner Blvd, Dell Rd., Anderson
Lakes Parkway. 17,659.1.
Volleyball Official 48.0
Duplicate Keys 128.1
Equipment Parts-Street Maintenance 10.,
Service-Valley View II, Franlo Rd., 14.70th St.,
Sunnybrook Road. 1,035.!, ;
300.0'
300.CK:
300.1r
300.0
300.0Y
300.0L
300.0c-
300.0r.) -
300.r
125.0
300.0r,.
200.(Y -
300.0n
125.0:
200.0[
300.0 -
196.0.
216.0 -
13.2
3,214.0 ,
20.0'
177.2'
16.0
132.0.
68.1.-1
37.c
589.1
12./
310.f.
186.;
50.(-
91 BROWN PHOTO
9868 KIM DIETER
9869 BUTCH'S BAR SUPPLY
9870 STEPHEN CALHOON
9871 CASH REGISTER SALES, INC.
9872 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS
9373 C. & NW. 1RANSPORTATION CO.
Film
Refund-Recreation Dept.
Supplies-Liquor Stores
Mileage
Service-Liquor Store, PV Mall
Chain-Forestry Dept.
Rental-Engineering Dept.
09
Pane Two
January 5, 1982
9874
98
9877
9878
9879
9830
9381
9832
9883
9884
9885
9836
9887
9838
9889
9390
9891
9892
9393
9894
9895
9896
9897
9898
98 0 "
99(
9901
9902
9903
9904
9905
9906
9907
9908
9909
9910
9911
9912
9913
9914
9915
9916
9917
9918
9919
9920
9921
9922
9923
9iP 4
9926
9927
9928
9929
9930
EXIDE BATTERY SALES
FARMERS STEEL CO.
FEED-RITE CONTROLS, INC.
JAN FLYNN
GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
DANA GIBBS
GRAHAM PAPER
GUNNAR ELECTRIC
HACH
JACK HACKING
HAPPY TYME DISTRIBUTORS
KAREN HARRIS
HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT CO.
HENN. CTY. PROPERTY TAX
HENN. CTY. SHERIFF'S DEPT.
HONEYWELL PROTECTION SERVICES
HAL HOUGHTON
CAROL HULTING
IBM CORPORATION
INSTY-PRINTS
MRS. ELAINES M. JACQUES
JERRY'S FRAME & BODY INC.
KARULF HARDWARE, INC.
JOSEPH KASID
TOM KEEFE
KOKESH ATIRETIC
KRIS KRYSTOFIAK
LANDCO EQUIPMENT, INC.
M. E. "MICKY" LANE, INC.
ALLEN LARSON
RICK LATHRUM
LOG IS
JAMES J. LORENCE
MARK'S EDEN PRAIRIE STANDARD
ROBERT N. MARTZ
MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIPMENT CO.
METRO AREA MANAGEMENT ASSN.
METRO WASTE CONTROL COMISSION
KAREN MICHAEL
MID-CENTRAL FIRE INC.
VOID OUT CHECK
I'll RN. PARK SUPERVISORS ASSN.
MINN. VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP
EARL R. AND HELEN MORE
MRPA TEAM REGISTRATION
MRPA TI AM REGISTRATION
PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.
CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SERVICE, INC.Equipment Repair & Parts
CLUTCH & U-JOINT BURNSVILLE, INC. Equipment Parts-Street Maintenance
COPY EQUIPMENT INC. Amnonia, Tape-Engineering Dept.
CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC, INC. Chemicals, Supplies-Water Dept.
CUSTOM DESIGNED AWARDS Plaque
WARD F. DAHLBERG Calculator-Liquor Store,PV Mall
DOMTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. Salt
DORHOLT PRINTING-STATIONERY, INC. Office Supplies
DRISKILL'S SUPER VALU Dog Food- Canine Unit
EMPIRE-CROWN AUTO, INC. Equipment Repair & Parts-Street Maintenance
Batteries-Street Maintenance
Steel Strapping-Park Maintenance
Sulfate-Water Dept.
Mileage
Equipment Repairs & Parts
Packet Delivery
Xerox Paper-City Hall
Furnace Repair-City Hall
Chemicals-Water Dept.
Expenses
Mixes-Liquor Store, PV Mall
Instructor-Dance Classes
Valve, Spring trap-Street Maintenance
Equipment Rental-Forestry Dept.
October Booking Fee-Police Dept.
Service-PV Mall Liquor Store
Volleyball & Basketball Official
Refund-Recreation Dept.
Office Supplies
Printing-Senior Citizens
Straw Bales-Park Dept.
Equipment repair
Handle, Clamps, Nails
Basketball Official
Basketball Official
Supplies-Recreation Dept.
Instructor-Adaptive Program
Supplies-Forestry Dept.
Public Official Bond
Mileage
Basketball Official
November 1981 Service
Land
Headlamp-Police Dept.
Expenses
Oxygen-Fire Dept.
1982 Dues
January 1982 Sewer Service
Mileage
Water nozzle-Park Dept.
1982 Dues
Service
Land-Park Dept.
Fee-Recreation Dept.
Fee-Recreation Dept.
Equipment -Repairs-Engineering Dept.
fi
61.2
521:/7
38.74
52.4Y
2,030.C ,.•
724.C:
158.5'
54.0'
30.3 ,
2,982.0 -
53.2. :
220.(;;
273.0
616.1:
855.0:
117.5,
56.4: •
614.•
631S7
11,992:1 •
84..
4.C.1
281.6 ..
92.0'
34.F,
122.5
12.7'
44.1'.
69.E.
28.C ,
99.0 -
203.1
12.2'
55.1
2,241.2
10,975.6
17.7
163.2'
63.2-
50,574.!, .
16.1' 60.0•
80.9: ,
44,306.C*
;
13.0!.
55.C:
50.0::
25.0:-.• •
,
140.4
1, 319 Cm
2,275.8 . .;
52.0.
346.7i
236.8i
8,162.87
165,0. .
60.0:
284.7:
84.3
31.7
4,299.7..
22.0,
63.!
150.V
156.0,
80.0'
Page Three
January 5, 1982
9931
NORTHERN STATES POWER
993?
NORTHERN STATES POWER
9931 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE
9934
CHRIS PALM
9935
PITNEY BOWES
9936
POWERS DEPARTMENT STORE
9937
PRAIRIE ELECTRIC CO.
9938 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN
9939 PETTY CASH/PUBLIC SAFETY
9940 DAVID RAQUET
9941 READY MIXED CONCRETE CO.
9942 REGISTER MEDIA INC.
9943 ROBERTS LITHO, INC.
9944 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES, INC.
9945 JAMES SCHMIDT
9946 KATHY SCHUMACHER
9947 SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.
9948 SEELYE PLASTICS, INC. Pipe-Water Dept.
9949 VIRGIL A. & LAURA MAE SEIFERT Land
9950 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING INC. Ads-Liquor Stores
9951 ELAINE STROM Refund-Recreation Dept.
9952 SPORTS WORLD Broomballs-Recreation Dept.
9953 SULLIVANS SERVICES INC. Service-Research Road
9954 MIKE TEITLEBAUM Instructor-Karate
995 ORRIN THOMPSON HOMES Refund-Special Assessments
99( VENC'S MACHINE & REPAIR Repair Water Nozzle-Park Dept.
9957 THE VICTORIA GAZETTE Ad-Liquor Stores
9958 JACK WASLEY Book-Park Planning
9959 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. Welding Supplies-Street Maintenance
9960 WILLIAMS STEEL & HARDWARE Hocky Goals-Park Dept.
9961 JASON WILLMORE Refund-Recreation Dept.
9962 XEROX CORPORATION Service
9963 ZIEGLER INC. Equipment Repairs & Parts
9964 M. BOGDEN Basketball' Official
9965 MARY LOU CARNEY Refund-Recreation Dept.
9966 CHARLTON-MC CLAY, INC. Bags-Liquor Stores
9967 FLOYD SECURITY Service-Liquor Store, PV Mall
9968 INTER DESIGN INC. Service
9969 METRO CONE COMMUNICATIONS Service
9970 MINN. RECREATION & PARK ASSN. Tickets-Hans Christian Anderson Play
9971 MINN. RECREATION & PARK ASSN. 1982 Dues-Recreation Dept.
9972 NORTHERN STATES POWER Service
9973 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE Service
9974 CHARLES PAPPAS Mileage
9975 MINNEGASCO Service
9976 JAMES A SCHMIDT Basketball Official
9977 KATHY SCHUMACHER Tests-Police Dept.
9978 TOWNS EDGE FORD, INC. Equipment Repairs & Parts
9979 SANDRA F. WERTS Mileage
998n CHRISTOPHER M. ENGER Expenses
9. ROBERT LAMBERT Expenses
9982 MINN. POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Seminar-Street Maintenance
Service 12,921.01
Service 1.81
Service 451.74
Instructor-Dance Class 2,678.4r
Postage Meter Rental 92.56
Refund-Beer License 50.0n
Service-Senior Citizens & Forest Hills Warming
House 1,313,5r
Plugs-Forestry Dept
8.7!,
Expenses
3.3:
Scraper-Street Maintenance
13.81
Gravel-Water Dept. ,
Ad-Liquor Stores
59.0C
Print Winter Outing Brochures
785.N
Portable Restroom
152.C1
Basketball Official
Tests-Police Dept. 150.0
Window Shades
370.Y.. •
tm13
101C,
age Four
Wulf , 5, 1982
)983 M ENTERPRISES
9984 MAGUEY CONSTRUCTION
9985 MIDLAND PRODUCTS COMPANY
9986 MINNESOTA pcilcupoucc OFFICERS
9987 SUPPLEE'S 7111 ENTERPRISES, INC.
9988 CARRIE TIETZ
Music system-Community Center
Service-Community Center
Equipment repair
1982 Dues-Police Dept.
January 1982 rent-Preserve
Service
3,400.00
35,660.60
140.40
200.00
2,858.15
33.25
TOTAL $288,894.10
December 31, 1981
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows:
12-15-81 9638 VOID OUT CHECK
9642 VOID OUT CHECK
9690 VOID OUT CHECK
9737 VOID OUT CHECK
12-11-81 9738 GRAY MANUFACTURING CO.
12-15-81 9739 TIM PIERCE & ASSOC. INC.
9740 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO.
9741 MARY REMOLI
9742 PETTY CASH-PUBLIC SAFETY
12-14-81 9743 POSTMASTER
9744 OLD PEORIA CO., INC.
9745 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC.
9746 JOHNSON BROS. WHLS. LIQUOR CO.
9747 HAPPY TYME 01ST.
9748 TWIN CITY WINE CO.
9749 PAUSTIS & SONS
9750 MINN. DISTILLERS, INC.
9751 INTERCONTINENTAL PKG. CO .
9752 CAPITOL CITY 01ST. CO.
9753 MIDWEST WINE CO.
9754 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO.
9755 KATHY SCHUMACHER
12-15-81 9756 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM.
9757 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CO.
9758 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE
9759 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN
9760 HMO SERVICES
9761 GROUP HEALTH PLAN
9762 HMO SERVICES
9763 BLUE CROSS INSURANCE
9764 GROSSMAN CHEVROLET
9765 COOPERATIVE POWER ASSOC.
9766 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
9767 COMM. OF REVENUE
9768 UNITED WAY OF MPLS.
9769 INTERNATL. UNION OF OPERATING
ENGINEERS
9770 PUB. EMPLOYEES RETIRE. ASSN.
12-17-81 9771 JASPERS, MORIARTY & WALBURG,
P.A. TRUST ACCT.
12-15-81 9772 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURRANCE CO.
9773 AETNA LIFE INS. & ANNUITY CO.
9774 MINN. STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
12-18-81 9775 PETTY CASH
9776 NATL. CITY BANK OF MPLS.
9777 ROBETT COMPTON
9778 JAMES RYLANDER
12-22-81 9779 COMM. OF REVENUE
12-18-81 9780 COMM. OF REVENUE
9781 STATE OF MINNESOTA
9782 JAMES & SHARON HOEFT
(75.00)
(619.74)
(9,053.70)
Wheel-Dolly-Street Maintenance 521.55
Service 300.00
Beer 8,953.70
Service-Winter Brochure
109.00
Expenses 6.09
Third Class Bulk Mailing Fee
40.00
Liquor 2,604.22
Liquor 5,409.93
Liquor 3,276.47
Mixes 56.40
Wine 691.47
Wine 47.56
Liquor 1,225.59
Wine 619.45
Wine 69.00
Wine 1,956.85
Liquor 3,783.48
Tests-Police Dept. 75.00
November 1981 SAC Charges
17,671.50
Equipment Repair & Parts
619.74
Insurance
568.35
Insurance
7,554.73
Insurance
1,566.73
Insurance
1,417.60
Insurance
624.10
Insurance
588.65
Squad Car-Police Dept. 7,600.00
Land-Public Safety
500.00
Payroll
14,487.22
Payroll
5,570.43
Payroll
46.96
Dues 378.00
Payroll 10,930.21
Land-Miller Property 139,600.00
Payroll 1,605.00
Payroll 90.00
Payroll 40.00
Expenses 72.63 .
Bond Payment 152,616.89 !
Fee-Recreation Dept. 1.00
Fee-Recreation Dept. 1.00
November 1981 Sales Tax 7,982.06
November 1981 Special Fuel Tax 189.41
Registration-Squad Car 5.75
Relocation Costs-Park Dept. 17,859.40
ing
Page Two
December 31, 1981
3,165.30
4,336.56
3,387.63
1,237.97
1,190.02
2,204.38
2,749.30
3,521.07
189.11
345.40
8.00
35.00
239.51
58.50
30.89
486.57
15,211.36
5,750 -.67
40.00
MOO
1,580.00:
46.96
100.00
11,295.32
1,003.00
94.10
1,036.92
1,209.57
499.59
2,021.53
8,858.38
8,267.52
35.75
78.50
148.85
15.50
12-21-81 9783 OLD PEORIA CO., INC. Liquor
9784 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INcr - Wine
9785 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. Liquor
9786 MINNESOTA DISTILLER, INC. Liquor
9787 MIDWEST WINE CO. - Wine
9788 TWIN CITY WINE CO. Wine
9789 INTERCONTINENTAL PKG. CO . Wine
9790 JOHNSON BROS. WHSE.LIQUOR CO. Liquor
9791 PAUSTIS & SONS Wine
9792 CAPITOL CITY DSTRB. CO ., INC. Liquor
9793 DOCUMENT SECTION,DEPT. OF ADMIN.Book-Water Dept.
12-18-81 9794 MINN. CHAPTER ASLA Conference-Park Planning
12-22-81 9795 BOUSTEAD ELECT. & MFR. CO . Motor--Public Works
9796 COMM. OF REVENUE, PETRO DIV. September 1981 Special Fuel Tax
12-28-81 9797 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Postage
12,24-81 9798 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE Tire Chains, Cable
9799 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Payroll
9800 COMM. OF REVENUE . Payroll
12-28-81 9801 MINN. ST . RETIRE. ASSN. Payroll
9802 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE ANNUNITY Payroll
9803 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO. Payroll
9804 UNITED WAY OF MPLS. Payroll
9805 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK Payroll
9806 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE. ASSN. Payroll
9807 U. S. POSTMASTER Postage-Assessing
12-29-81 9808 TWIN CITY WINE CO. Wine
9809 OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. Liquor
9810 MIDWEST WINE CO. Wine
9811 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. Liquor
9812 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE Liquor
9813 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS Liquor
9814 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. Liquor
9815 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING Wine
12-30-81 9816 LANCE ENTERPRISES, INC. Freight-Community Center
9817 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Postage-Utility Bills District #2
9818 BECKI WARNER Mileage
9819
VOID OUT CHECK
9820
VOID OUT CHECK
9821
VOID OUT CHECK
9822
VOID OUT CHECK
9823
VOID OUT CHECK
9824
VOID OUT CHECK
9825
VOID OUT CHECK
Total
John D. Frane
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 82-01
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE OFFICIAL MEETING DATES, TIME
AND PLACE FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COUNCIL MEMBERS IN
1982 AND APPOINTING AN ACTING MAYOR.
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, that they meet on the first and third Tuesdays of each month
at 7:30 p.m. to be adjourned by 11:30 p.m., unless waived by unanimous
vote of members present,in the Eden Prairie City Hall, 8950 Eden Prairie
Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
BE IT RESOLVED, that is hereby appointed to
be the acting Mayor in the absence of the Mayor.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 5th
day of January, 1982.
Wafgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST : SEAL
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 82-02
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE OFFICIAL CITY NEWSPAPER
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, that the be designated as the
official City newspaper for the year 1982.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 5th
day of January 1982.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
,7:1 1/1e
vegDttte7 me in, inc.
December 3, 1981
To: Members of the City Council of Eden Prairie
I would like to propose that the Eden Prairie City Council
designate the Prairie Refister as the legal newspaper for
the City of Eden prairie beginning in January of 1982.
I believe there are numerous reasons why this would be
a positive move.
First and foremost is that the Prairie Register maintains
an in-house computerized mailing list of residential
addresses for Eden Prairie, thus allowing our paper to
maintain an all but total saturation level of homes.
We would thereby give more Eden Prairie residents an
opportunity to see and read the legal notices. No other
Eden Prairie-based newspaper goes to every home.
Not only can the Prairie Register offer more than double
the existing coverage for legal notices, it can do so for
less cost per line in 1982 than was paid in 1981. (See
attached worksheets for figures). Considering our
circulation of more than 6,000 residential addresses
and a rate reduction of several cents a line below
the allowable maximum, we conclude that the City of
Eden Prairie can save tax dollars while improving its
communications with its citizens.
I have lived in Eden Prairie since 1969 and am very
concerned with this community as a whole. The fact that
my business is based here and operates what is traditionally
considered the most community-oriented type of business
there is, a newspaper, should bear out that fact.
If, as we hope, you've been watching the Prairie Register
since its first issue only a year ago, you will have
noticed how it has changed as we continually try to
improve its service to the residents of this city.
That progress will continue.
I believe, based on the facts, that the Prairie Rerister
would be the best choice for Eden Prairie as its legal
newspaper.
Yourirrul,
Northan A. Franks
Publisher
7414 Mitchell Road • Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 • (612) 937-1611
Prairie Register • Register graphics
1 42
Page 1
Prairie Register Legal Notice Rates
The Prairie Register proposes to print the legal notices for the City of Eden Prairie at the
following rates:
.30 per standard line
.40 per special line
.20 per subsequent insertion, any line
The maximum rates' allowed by law are:
.3256 per standard line
.434 per special line
.217 per subsequent insertion, any line
Please note that the rates we propose to charge represent savings to the city of more than 7.8
percent over the legal maximum, which we believe is what the city is presently paying.
*See Page 2 for maximum rate calculations.
Page 2
Prairie Register Legal Notice Maximum Rates
These rates are calculated by adjusting the standard fees "to produce the same net average
compensation for the matter published" as specified by law.
Prairie Register legal notices will be set in six-point type with 6 points line spacing, or 12 lines
to the inch, also as specified.
Fee adjustments:
• Our line length is 11% picas, as opposed to 11 picas in the standard line. Therefore our
line will hold more copy, and the line fee should be increased by a factor figured as follows:
111/4 (our line) + 11 (standard line) = 1.045
• Our type face (California) has a six-point lower-case alphabet length of 78 points, as
opposed to 90 points for the lower-case alphabet length of the standard type face (Timm
Roman). Our type face is thus more compact, allowing more copy on a line than the standard
type face. The line fee should, then, be increased by a factor figured as follows:
90 (standard face) + 78 (our face) 1.154
• The two factors combined are:
1.154 (type face factor) x 1.045 (line length factor) 1.206 (combined factor)
• The standard fees are:
27e per standard line (first insertion)
36c per special line (first insertion)
lEle for subsequent insertions of any line
• The adjusted fees are:
.27 x 1.206 (adjustment factor) .3256 nutximurn per standard line
.36 x 1.206 (adjustment factor) .434 maximum per special line
.18 x 1.206 (adjustment factor) .217 maximum per subsequent insertion, any line
n
Page 3
(Offkb1 Publicetion
CITY Or MO/ PRAIRIE
ZONING BOARD Or APPEALS AND AD.
MEWED!
NOTICE Or PUBLIC HEARING
'. REGARDING VARIANCE REQUEST
11.33
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE LS HEREBY GIVEN that the Zoning
Board o/ Appeals and Adjustments MU meat at the
iollowing Uwe and Eact:
7:63 P.M.
Thamday, Nov. 19, 1911
At the Eden Prairie Clay Hall
MO Eden Prairie Rood, 56314
Is review and consider the variance request 1143,
submitted by Marty Jensen for property located M'
10101 Hilltop Rd, TIe request is tar s variance Han
Ord. 135 requesting (or a front yard setback for 6'
encroachment from misting front setback, Written
or oral mounenta relating to Um variance request
will be heard at this meeting. Said vs.riance op.
phallism is on Ida for public review at the Building
Dept. at Edon Prairie City Hall.
City el Eden Prairie
• RUILDING DEPT.
(Pobilabed in UN Eden Prairie News November 6,
1911)
1. A notice as typeset and published by the Eden
Prairie News.
(011nial PohliratIon 2019).
CITV OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ZONING BOARD Ot' APPEALS AND AD.
WSTMENTS
NOTICE F Pt 411.IC DEARING
REGARDINC VARIANCE REQUEST
111.113
TO WOOS' Ur MAT CONCERN:
NOTICE IS IIEHERV LIVEN that the Zoning
Roar) Appeall end Adjustments nail meet at the
following time and plate,
7:30 I'M
Thursday, Nov. 19. 1901
Al the Eden Piairie City 1611
5930 1'),,, Prairie Road, 55340
IO rmkn- and corned./ in' request 1I.63,
submitted by Made Jessen ft, ',KOMI Al
16101 11 n 111 op Ad. Thr ia bit. a Noumea. front
Ord. 135 ovaimitnit for 110111 %ant nelliml tot 0'
enema, linum 110111 misting 1 beiliack. Mitten
ow oral claim% ot. 'dating to dm ,.,,.n,n mut. r
will tad.. ant at tho meeting Said variance apid
Ron I. on 1.1' for math.: re, iewiti the Mudding INT,
Al Eden i'111111! C,i1 11.11
City of Eden Prairie
DOMING DEPT.
thrldidnI1 In the Eden Prairie Nom Nmembet 5.
I 1 1
2. The same notice as typeset by the Prairie Register.
sht.defstlitiklumnixeNnon bye 3. The six-point lower-case alphabet of the Prairie
Register type face. It is WA picas, or 78 points, long.
115
GEOROE C. HOFF
TFD A. ALLEN
REBECCA A. JOIKE
STEVAN S. YASOUR
'LAW OFFICES
COLLINS, HOFF & ALLEN
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
250 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
B100 SCHOONER BOULEVARD
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 LLLLLL ONE 941 -9220
ARCA CODE 612
OF COuNBEL
ROBERT F. COLLINS
GEORGE A. KURTZ
December 10, 1981
City Of Eden Prairie
City Hall
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Attention: Mr. Carl Jullie
Re: The Prairie Register
Dear Mr. Jullie:
At the request of Norman A. Franks, Publisher of the Prairie
Register, we have examined various issues of the Prairie Register
and have examined such other documents and made such inquiries and
investigations as we deem necessary and relevant as a bases for
this opinion.
Based on the foregoing, it is our opinion that the Prairie
Register satisfies the requirements of Minnesota Statutes 331.02,
Subdivision 1, in order to be qualified as a medium of official
and legal publication.
Very truly yours,
COLLINS, HOFF & ALLEN, P. A.
Ted A. 14
TAA:skw
844
Eden Prairie
News
15716 West 78th Street
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 LL--_
937-8690
December 29, 1981
DEC 3; 1981
Mayor Wolfgang Penzel
City of Eden Ppairie
8950 Eden Prairie Rd.
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Your honor:
The Eden Prairie News hereby requests designation as the official newspaper
for the City of Eden Prairie during 1982.
Our line rate, as computed by the office of the state printer, is as follows:
31.8 cents per line for first insertion
21.2 cents per line for each subsequent insertion
10.6 cents per line additional for extra composition, first
insertion only
These rates represent no increase in cost over last year.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. We hope we may continue to be
of service to the city.
Sincerely,
Stan Rolfsrud
Publisher
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 82-03
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY OFFICIALS TO TRANSACT
BANKING BUSINESS
BE IT RESOLVED, that the persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and
Treasurer of the City of Eden Prairie, be and they hereby are, authorized
to act for this City in the transaction of any banking business with the
official depositories (hereinafter referred to as the banks), such authority
including authority on behalf of or in the name of the City from time to
time and until written notice to the bank to the contrary, to sign checks
against said account, which checks will be signed by the Mayor, Manager
and City Treasurer. The bank is hereby authorized and directed to honor
and pay any check against such account which is signed as above described,
whether or not said check is payable to the order of, or deposited to the
credit of, any officer or officers of the City including the signer or
signers of the check.
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED, that the Acting Mayor be authorized to sign
checks as an alternate for the Mayor, the Deputy Treasurer be authorized
to sign checks as an alternate for the Treasurer.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 5th
day of January, 1982.
ATTEST:
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
Vi
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 82-04
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING USE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
BE IT RESOLVED that the use of facsimile signatures by the following
named persons:
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
and
John D. Frane, Treasurer or Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
on checks, drafts, warrant-checks, warrants, vouchers or other orders on
public funds deposited hereby is approved, and that each of said named persons
may authorize the depository bank to honor any such instrument bearing his
facsimile signature in such form as he may designate and to charge the same
to the account in said depository bank upon which drawn, as fully as though
it bore his manually written signature, and that instruments so honored shall
be wholly operative and binding in favor of said depository bank although
such facsimile signature shall be affixed without his authority.
ADOPTED by the City Council on the 5th day of January, 1982.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 82-05
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Suburban National Bank
and the First State Bank, both of
Eden Prairie, Minnesota, authorized to do banking business in Minnesota,
be and hereby are designated as Official Depositories for the Public Funds
of the City of Eden Prairie, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, for a period
of one year from this date. The City Treasurer shall maintain adequate
collateral for funds in the depositories.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 5th
day of January, 1982.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
Sincerely,
//.
Jodeph Clemons
President
0
JC/ve
%MN 5 1982
First State Bank of Eden Prairie
7901 Flying Cloud Drive. Eden Prairie, A1 Inne.vota 55344 • Phone 6121944-6262
January 5, 1982
Mr. Wolfgang H. Fenzel, Mayor
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Mayor Penzel:
On behalf of the directors, officers and staff of
the First State Bark of Eden Prairie, we wish to thank the
City of Eden Prairie for favoring us with its account rela-
tionship during the course of the past two years.
We most sincerely hope our service has been satis-
factory and that we may continue to serve the City of Eden
Prairie in this and other capacities in the future.
Please accept this letter as our Bank's formal
request to act as the main depository for the City of Eden
Prairie for the year 1982.
Kind personal regards.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 82-06
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TREASURER TO INVEST
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE FUNDS
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,
County of Hennepin, that the City Treasurer is authorized to invest City
of Eden Prairie funds with any bank, or .other Financial Institution
authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota in Certificates of
Deposit, U.S. Government Notes and Bills, obligations of the State of
Minnesota or any of its subdivisions, Federal Government Agency Bonds
and Notes, Savings Accounts and Repurchase Agreements and any other
security authorized by law. The City Treasurer shall maintain adequate
collateral for funds deposited.
ADOPTED by the City Council on this 5th day of January, 1982.
14olfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clik
1.20
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
111RU: Carl Jullic, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Service-04--
DATE: December 29, 1982
SUBJECT: Snowmobile Operation on Lakes and Parks
On January 26, 1971 the Eden Prairie City Council approved Ordin
a
n
c
e
No. 148 Regulating the Operation of Snowmobiles Within the Villa
g
e
o
f
Eden Prairie. Within this ordinance in Section 3 under "Operati
o
n
Generally" this ordinance states: "Except as otherwise specifica
l
l
y
permitted and authorized it is unlawful for any person to operat
e
a
snowmobile within the limits of the Village of Eden Prairie. Su
d
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
1 - on a public sidewalk or walkway provided for use or used fo
r
pedestrian travel. Subdivision 2 - on private property of anoth
e
r
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
lawful authority or consent of the owner or occupant. Subdivisi
o
n
3
-
on any pubically owned lands and frozen waters including but not
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
t
o
school grounds, park property, playgrounds, recreation areas, g
o
l
f
c
o
u
r
s
e
s
and lakes, except areas previously listed or authorized for use
b
y
t
h
e
proper public authorities, in which case such use should be law
f
u
l
a
n
d
snowmobiles may be driven in and out of such areas by the short
e
s
t
r
o
u
t
e
.
Authorized areas in the Village of Eden Prairie owned or regula
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
Village including frozen waters shall be designated by Council
r
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
"
.
On January 26, 1971 the Eden Prairie City Council passed Resolu
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
401 Designating Specific Public Lands and Frozen Waters Owned a
n
d
/
o
r
Regulated by the Village as Designated Snowmobile Areas in Acco
r
d
a
n
c
e
with Ordinace No. 148. The public lands designated as snowmobi
l
e
a
r
e
a
s
by that resolution are:
- Round Lake Park north of the westerly extension of Valley
View Road
- Birch Island Park
Under frozen waters designated as snowmobile areas were all th
e
l
a
k
e
s
within the City with the exception of Anderson Lakes.
On December 21, 1981, staff recommended to the Parks, Recreati
o
n
a
n
d
Natural Resources Commission that the City revise Resolution No.
4
0
1
and eliminate snowmobiling in all of Round Lake Park and in Birc
h
Island Park and also to eliminate snowmobiling on Round Lake, as
w
e
l
l
Anderson Lakes. llis would still allow snowmobiles to travel on approved
snowmobile trails within certain parks, but would not allow snow
m
o
b
i
l
i
n
g
over these entire areas as defined in Resolution No. 401.
111
\
Staff recommended to the Commission to eliminate snowmobiling on
Round Lake immediately because the City will be operating an aerator
on that lake this winter and in the future will be clearing the perimeter
portion of the lake for ice skating: Staff also feels that if snow-
mobiles are allowed on Round Lake we only encourage snowmobiles
throughout the entire park. Staff recommended eliminating snowmobiling
in Birch Island Park because it is only a 17 acre park and it is
not adjacent to any snowmobile trail. Staff feels that a 17 acre park
is too small for a designated snowmobile area. However, at that meeting
a Commission member, who lives adjacent to the park, indicated that
many of the Eden Prairie residents living adjacent ot Birch Island Lake
use the lake and the park for snowmobiling and doesn't feel that it is
problem at this time.
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended that
the City Council revise Resolution NO. 401 eliminating snowmobiling
throughout Round Lake Park and eliminating snowmobiling on Round Lake, as
well as Anderson Lakes, but did not feel that it was necessary to
eliminate snowmobiling in Birch Island Park at this time. City staff
concurs with this recommendation and recommends approval of Resolution
No. 82-16, which is attached.
Roger Pauly has also recommended revising Ordinance No. 148 to eliminate
ambiguous language. The proposed amended ordinance is also attached'.
Staff recommends the Council approve the first reading of Ordinance
No. 82-02.
RL:md
John D. Franc, City Clerk
SEAL
1211
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 82-16
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SNOWMOBILE AREAS WIMIN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,
County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that Resolution No. 401 is repealed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City of Eden Prairie, County of
Hennepin, Minnesota, that the following public lands and frozen waters
owned and/or regulated by the City be designated as authorized snow-
mobile areas in accordance with Ordinance No. 148, Section 3, Subdivision
3.
Public Lands
1. Birch Island Park
Frozen Waters (limited to only the frozen lake surface if the
snowmobiler can gain legal access either through public land
or permission from a private land owner.)
1. Staring Lake
2. Birch Island Lake
3. Bryant Lake
4. Mitchell Lake
S. Riley Lake
6. Red Rock Lake
7. Duck Lake
8. Rice Lake
9. Grass Lake
ADOPTED by the City Council on
, 1982.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 82-02
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE OPERATION OF SNOWMOBILE
S
A
N
D
A
M
E
N
D
I
N
G
O
R
D
I
N
A
N
C
E
NO. 148.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORD
A
I
N
A
S
F
O
L
L
O
W
S
:
Section 1. Ordinance 148, Section 3, Subdivision 3 is amended
b
y
deleting therefrom the first sentence and substititin
g
t
h
e
r
e
f
o
r
e
t
h
e
following:
On any publically owned lands and frozen waters, inc
l
u
d
i
n
g
b
u
t
n
o
t
limited to school grounds, park property, playgrounds,
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
areas, golf courses and lakes except areas authorized
f
o
r
s
u
c
h
use by the proper public authority, in which case such
u
s
e
s
h
o
u
l
d
be lawful and snowmobiles may be driven in and out of
s
u
c
h
a
r
e
a
s
by the shortest route.
Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective from and afte
r
its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
Eden Prairie on the day of , 1982, and finally read and
adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
of said City on the day of
, 1982.
Wolfgang. H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, City Clerk
SEAL
Published in Eden Prairie News the
day of , 1982.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services ?A L "
DATE: December 29, 1982
SUBJECT: Community Center Stavis Request to Approve Handic
a
p
p
e
d
F
e
e
s
COMMUNITY CENTER STATUS
Attached to this memo is a memo from Pete Curley dated December 2
1
,
1
9
8
1
summarizing a coordination meeting held on that date. Throug
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
construction of the Community Center, City staff have been co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
in indicating to the general contractor that the City would n
o
t
a
c
c
e
p
t
the Community Center on a partial occupancy basis. Approxim
a
t
e
l
y
s
i
x
weeks ago City staff met with all of the contractors involved w
i
t
h
t
h
e
Community Center and at that time they all indicated that there
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
no problem completing the entire facility by January 15th. Bas
e
d
o
n
t
h
a
t
information City staff felt it was fairly safe to begin selling
i
c
e
t
i
m
e
on February 1st. City staff have inspected the progress on the C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Center on a daily basis and were concerned about the progress
,
e
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
l
y
in the area of the swimming pool, and requested a meeting on D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
of all subcontractors. At that meeting, all contractors with th
e
e
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
of the ceramic tile contractor for the swimming pool indicated
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
substantial completion would now be Janauary 23, with the exce
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
the swimming pool itself. The ceramic tile contractor felt t
h
a
t
t
h
e
t
i
l
i
n
g
operation could not be completed prior to the first week in Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
.
D
u
e
to the amount of ice time commitments as of February 1, staff is
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
accepting a substantial completion date of Janaury 23 except for
t
h
e
s
w
i
m
m
i
n
g
pool, which should be completed during the first week of Feb
r
u
a
r
y
.
S
t
a
f
f
has requested access to the facility as of January 15 to begin
i
c
e
m
a
k
i
n
g
and general cleanup, waxing of floors, installing building equ
i
p
m
e
n
t
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
equipment, etc. The general contractor has agreed to allow th
e
C
i
t
y
t
o
occupy the building as of January 15, and to a substantial com
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
d
a
t
e
of Janaury 23rd. lIe has also agreed to pay for the utility co
s
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
natatorium until completion of that area.
At this time, City staff requests the Council to approve acce
p
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
substantial completion date of January 23 and owner occupancy
e
x
c
e
p
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
natatorium on that date. During the week of Janaury 23 thro
u
g
h
t
h
e
2
9
,
s
t
a
f
f
will be bringing in full-time and part-time people to get the b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
i
n
shape for the opening on February 1 and for training sessions
.
SENIOR CITIZEN AND HANDICAPPED FEE DISCOUNT
Attached to the memo is a November 10, 1981 memo from the Hum
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
a
n
d
Services Commission regarding a recommendation on the Communi
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
f
e
e
discount for senior citizens and handicapped. The Community
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
s
t
a
f
f
recommends approval of the Commission reconmiendation regardi
n
g
a
5
0
1
.
d
i
s
c
o
u
n
t
on memberships to the Community Center for senior citizens. C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
I,2,2 •
staff also recommends that handicapped participants receive a 501 discount
when applying for an individual membership, and group homes receive a 50%
discount on family memberships.
BL:md
I,2a
age
DATE: December 21, 1981
COMM. NO.: 8002
PROJECT Eden Prairie Community Center
SUBJECT: Coordination Meeting 1021 LaSaDe Avenue
PRESENT: Bob Lambert, Chuck Pappas, Chuck Magnpv Minneapolis lAnnesota 55403
Dave Brellenthin, Lee Hollingsworth, (612) 332 1401
Bud Weaver, Bob T. Weaver, Carl Sorenson,
memorandum Gene Casci, Bob Schuman, Joe Dolejs,
P te Curley
etc Curley
ob Lambert, Chuck Magney, Bob T. Weaver, Carl Sorenson,
Gene Casci, Chris Banta, Bob Schuman, Joe Dolejs,
Was Matsumoto
A meeting was held at site at 9:00 a.m. December 21, 1981, to
review scheduling for Final Completion with the following items
discussed.
1. Bob Lambert indicated he has commitments for ice arena begin-
ning February 1, 1982 and would still prefer occupancy by
the previous* agreed date of January 15, 1982, to allow for
furnishing, stocking, training personnel, etc. He would also
like use of all other areas by February 1, 1982 as well.
2. Holmsten was not represented and the major item to be done
in Ice Arena are the Dasher Boards. Chuck Pappas indicated
he had heard board installation would begin December 28, 1981,
and would take approximately 1-1/2 to 2 weeks for completion.
This would not appear to present a problem, but Dave will
check this out with Holmsten so there is not delay in comple-
tion as scheduled.
3. Painting is nearly complete in Ice Arena except for final
coat of blue on one wall, some minor touch ups and the graphics.
Gene sees no problem with completing all painting by January
15, 1982, except graphics completion may take an additional
week. All graphics and painting in ice arena will be com-
pleted prior to January 15, 1982.
4. Bob Weaver indicates that he will need at least a week to
complete installation of devices and check out systems after
painter has completed. Painter and electrician will coor-
dinate any areas that need earlier final painting so as not
to delay systems check-out.
5. Dave noted that the exterior sign is 3 letters short and
installation may be slightly delayed. Installation 'of
lockers, toilet partitions, accessories, etc. is in process
or will begin this week and General Contractor sees no problem
with completion of misc, general items per schedule.
GLOT1ER
ASSOCIATES
Architects Engineers Planners
MEMO BY:
MEMO TO:
124
MEMO
Page 2
December 21, 1981
6. Some plumbing fixtures not installed but all mechanical
equipment is nearly operational and no problems are forseen
to meet completion date.
7. Training sessions will be scheduled with Chuck Pappas for
all equipment operation as soon as practical.
8. Ceramic tile contractor indicates it would normally take
8 weeks for a pool of this size, so he says there is no
way it can be completed before the 1st week of February.
Allowing time for filling and balancing it appears that
the Pool would not be operational before February 15, 1982.
He will provide additional personnel to 'expedite the com-
pletion of grouting but can use only a certain size crew for
tile installation in order to control the quality of the
workmanship.
9. It was agreed that a Substantial Completion date of January
23, 1982, be established for Owner's occupancy except for
the Natatorium. The ice arena should be available by
January 15, 1982, to begin ice making process.
10. Cooperation between all trades is necessary and must continue
to be expedited for occupancy by the Owner as scheduled.
11. A Site Coordination meeting will be held at site at 9:00 a.m.
on Thursday January 7, 1982, to review progress and status
of completion. All parties present at this meeting should
plan to attend.
I 2S
MEMORANDUM
TO:. Chuck Pappas and Bob Lambert
FROM: Human Rights and Services Commission
DATE: November 10, 1981
SUBJECT: Commission's Recommendation on Community Center Fee Disc
o
u
n
t
for Senior Citizens and Handicapped
On Monday, November 9, 1981 the Human Rights and Servic
e
s
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
m
a
d
e
the following recommendations on the new Community Cente
r
f
e
e
d
i
s
c
o
u
n
t
.
for senior citizens and handicapped participants.
The Commission recommends that senior citizens in Eden
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
a
50% discount on memberships to the Community Center.
The Commission further recommends that handicapped part
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
a 50% discount when applying for an individual membership
a
n
d
g
r
o
u
p
h
o
m
e
s
receive a 50% discount on family memberships. All applic
a
n
t
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
g
individual handicapped discounts will be asked to show som
e
t
y
p
e
o
f
d
o
c
u
-
mentation to receive the 50% discount.