Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 08/04/1981EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, AUGUST 4, 1981 JUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL STAFF: INVOCATION: Councilman George Bentley PLEDGE OF AllEGIANCE ROLL CALL 7:30 PM, CITY HALL Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath and George Tangen City Manager Carl Jullie; City Attorney Roger Pauly; Finance Director John Frane; Planning Director Chris Enger; Director of Community Services Bob Lambert; City Engineer Gene Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. MINUTES A. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, July 21, 1981 B. Joint. City Council/Human Rights & Services Commission meeting held Monday, July 27, 1981 C. City Council meeting held Monday, July 27, 1981 III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 81-36, amending Ordinance No. 81-35, the ordinance authorizing the declaration of a State of water emergency during which time the use of water shall be regulated, and prescribing a penalty B. Extension of bid period for Round Lake Playground equipment and authorize addendum C. Award bids for Round Lake irrigation system D. Award bids for grading of Staring Lake Park and Red Rock Park E. Change Order request for Round Lake Park Shelter F. Approve plans and specifications for improvements for Valley Place Offices, I.C. 51-409, and authorize bids to be received August 27, 1981 (Resolution No. 81-148) G. Award contract for 1981 Water Meter bid, 1.C. 52-003 (Resolution No. 81:1-49) H. Award contract for 1981 Seal Coat Project, I.C. 52-002 (Resolution No. 81-150) I. Receive_petition and authorize feasibility report and preparation of plans and specifications for Golden Ridge Utility Improvements, I.C. 52-008 (Resolution No. 81-151) Page 1590 Page 1598 Page 1601 Page 1536 1 Page 1602 I Page 1603 Page 1604 Page 1605 Page 1607 City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,August 4, 1981 J. Receive 100% petition and authorize improvements for 7661 Atherton Way, I.C. 52-009 (iEiblution No. 81-152) K. Receive 100% petition and authorize preparation of plans and specifications for "CPT/Eaton/SGL/CPA" Road project, I.C. 52-010 (Resolution No. 81-153) L. Receive petition for Eden Road Improvements and authorize feasibility report, I.C. 52-011 (Resolution No. 81-154) M. Resolution appropriating Municipal State-Aid Funds for TH 169/Anderson Lakes Parkway Signalization, I.C. 51-34117Resolution No. 81-155) N. Receive feasibility report for drainage improvements in the vicinity nf 69th Street between Washington Avenue and Shady Oak Road, I.C. 52-004, and schedule Public Hearing for September 1, 1961(-Reso1ution No. 81-156) 0. Approve Change Order No. 2 for water supply wells, Contract No. 1, I.C. 51-354 Page 1615 Page 1618 Page 1625 Page 1627 Page 1628 Page 1629 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Federal Revenue Sharing Funds V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 7632 - 7814 VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS A. Development Commission - Report on Development Costs VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Smetana's Creekside Addition by Frank J. Smetana, Jr. Request to preliminary plat 3.6 acres from approximately 16 acres zoned Rural. Located west of 7722 Smetana Lane (Resolution No. 81-144) B. Creek Ridge Estates by Brian Gensmer. Request to preliminary plat 31 acres zoned Rural into 5 lots of single family homes. Located in the northwest quadrant of Co. Rd. 18 and Riverview Road (Resolution No. 81-145) VIII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution No. 81-147, approving amendment to Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council Bylaws IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, COARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members B. Report of City Attorney Page 1630 Page 1631 Page 1635 Page 1642 Page 1647 Page 1658 City Council Agenda - 3 - .Tues.,August 4, 1981 C. Report of City Manager D. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Request to obtain quotes for an architect to design the Staring Page 1662 Lake Park Shelter and Neighborhood Park Shelters 2. Creekwood Multi-Use Court Page 1663 3. Change Order Request for Community Center Page 1664 E. Report of City Engineer 1. Receive petition and authorize preparation of Feasibility Report Page 1672 for drainage improvements north of Martin Drive, I.C. 52-007 (Resolution No. 81-139) Continued from 7/21/81 F. Report of Finance Director 1. Clerk's License List Page 1673 X. NEW BUSINESS XI. ADJOURNMENT. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 21, 1981 COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: INVOCATION: Councilman Paul Redpath PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL 7:30 PM, CITY HALL Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath, and George Tangen City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City Attorney Roger Pauly, City Engineer Gene Dietz, Finance Director John D. Frane, Planning Director Chris Enger, Dir- ector of Community Services Bob Lambert, Director of Public Safety Jack Hacking, Building Official Wayne Sanders, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael I. PRESENTATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AWARDS TO NATHANA STENEMAN AND KAREN OLNESS, HAKON TORJESEN, ERIK, KRISTINE, MALIKA & MARK Mayor Penzel introduced Duane Pidcock, Chairman of the Human Rights Commission, who presented the awards. The plague presented to Nathana Steneman read "For her exceptional dedication to and generous efforts with parenting support and education." Mrs. Steneman said she has spent the last six years involved in parenting, the last two years with MELD (Minnesota Early Learning Design), Karen Olness and Hakon Torjesen accepted their plague which read "For the generous gifts of time and talent they have shared with refugees from Laos, both in Thailand and here in Minnesota." The Torjesen children were unable to be present because of camp commitments. Torjesen thanked members of the Eden Prairie Rotary Club in which five members of the Council are active for their support in assisting in providing.a truck for this project. Edstrom noted the Torjesen's have just had a book published,"The Gift of The Refugees", which is very interesting reading. City Manager Jullie introduced Wayne Sanders, the new Building Official. Director of Community Services Lambert introduced Jan Flynn who will be replacing Rae Bly as Human Services Coordinator. Edstrom expressed thanks to Bly for a fantastic job and wished her well in her new endeavor as a law student. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following items were added to the Agenda: VIII. D. 3. Community Center Tour; VIII. D. 4. Senior Citizen's Center Gazebo; and VIII. E. 2. Water Saver. /9 City Council Minutes -2- July 21, 1981 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to approve the Agenda as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. III. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, JULY 7, 1981 p. 5, pare 8, line 1 - "Hearing, to deny the request to rezone lot 2, block 1 and lots 5 & 6, block 2; and. . ." p. 10, para. 9, - "housing and transportation study. . ." p. 11, para. 3, - insert the following in place of para. 3: "The Court issued an order for judgement for plaintiff in the tax increment financing case. The order is very short with a short memorandum attached to it; the essence of which is that the City terminated the plan and the plaintiff prevails. However, no monetary award was made to the plaintiff as he requested. Also the Court did not make any order relative to the rollback as had been requested by plaintiff. The memorandum contains mistatements of fact as to the relief requested by plaintiff and as to the joinder of the HRA in the case. The Court stated that plaintiff asked for an injunction, which he did not; and that the City, rather than plaintiff, asked for the HRA to be joined as a party. "It is not clear from the order what judgement will be entered by the clerk. Con- sequently the Court will be asked to clarify the order so the resulting judgement will not have any potential effect on the City's tax increment financing plans for the future." MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the minutes of the July 7, 1981, Council meeting as amended and published. Motion carried with Redpath abstaining. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 78-200, rezoning from R1-22 to Community Commercial for Eden Prairie Grocery and developer's agreement C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 81-01, rezoning from Rural to RM 2.5 for Edenvale Apartments by Edenvale Apartments, a partnership, and developer's agreement D. Consider bids for Creekview Estates Improvement project, I.C. 51-375, (Resolution No. 81-138) E. Resolution No. 81-137, confirming administrative land division approval for Castle Ridge F. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 81-10, rezoning lot 1, block 1, from R1-13.5 to RM 6.5 for 1 duplex, Lake Trail Estates by Swenson & Schwartz City Council Minutes -3- July 21, 1981 G. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 81-36, amending Ordinance No. 81-35, the Ordinance authorizing the declaration of a state of water emergency during which time the use of water shall be regulated, and prescribing a penalty H. Authorization to advertise and receive bids for construction of a well to serve the irrigation system at Round Lake I. Approve plans and specifications for I.C. 51-381, Sunnybrook Road improvements, and authorize bids to be received 10:00 AM, August 13, 1981 J. Approve plans and specifications for I.C. 52-005, Eden Road improvements, and authorize bids to be received 10:00 AM, August 13, 1981 (Resolution No. 81-141) K. Final plat approval for Fairway Wood 3 (Resolution No. 81-140) L. Final approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amounts of $24167875.00 (Resolution No. 81-133) and $57,375.00 (Resolution No. 81-132) for Ryan Lake Ridge Project M. Final approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amounts of 342,250.00 (Resolution No. 81-133 and $48,450.00 Resolution No. 81-134 for Oldre Partnership Project N. Final approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amounts of $350,625.00 (Resolution No. 81-135) and $70,125.OolResolution No. 81-13T for Hustad MOTION: Moved by Bentley, seconded by Redpath, to approve items A - N on the Consent Calendar. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom (abstained on item K), Red- path, Tangen, and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. BLUFF'S EAST by Hustad Development Corporation. Request for PUD Development state approval, rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 and preliminary platting of 106 townhouses with possible variances. Located in the southwest corner of Co. Rd. 1 and Franlo Road (Ordinance No. 81-11 and Resolution No. 81-143) Dick Putnam, Hustad Development Corporation, and Rick Sathre, Sathre, Berg- quist, Inc., spoke to the proposal. Putnam reviewed the history of proposals for this property, went over the grading plan, site plan, and discussed the tot lots and access points. Sathre further reviewed grading and access points. Planning Director Enger stated this proposal had been considered by the Planning Commission at its June 22, 1981, meeting at which time the Commission recommended approval by a vote of 5-1. The Commission recommended the Reichow property rezoning not take place at this time, and that its approval was subject to the recommendations included in the June 19, 1981, Staff Report. Also in- cluded was the addition of a storm sewer overflow pipe. City Council Minutes -4- July 21, 1981 Director of Community Services Lambert reported the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission had reviewed this proposal at its July 6, 1981, meeting and had voted unanimously to approve the proposal subject to Staff Report recommendations with the addition that the developer should commit to develop the proposed tot lot adjacent to the Reichow property by the time the abutting townhouses are completed and before any other townhouse units are erected. The west tot lot should be developed in the same manner. Redpath inquired what the plans are for the Reichow property if it is about 12' higher than that of the proposed development. Putnam responded that plans are uncertain for that property as the Reichows do not wish to sell at the mo- ment. Because of the trees which surround the Reichow property, the grading for the proposed project is away from the Reichow property so as not to disturb the vegetation. Redpath asked about access to the property owned by Dave Brown which abuts this property to the west. Enger pointed out that this could be served from Bennett Place or Blossom Road, but it is not clear at this time which point would provide easier access. Bentley wondered if Enger had received an updated grading map. Enger said he had not, but that revisions in the grading plan may come about pending Council approval/action on the request before them. Bentley asked if the grading would be staged. Putnam responded it would not because the most efficient way would be to do it all at once. Bentley expressed concern about the road connections to the west and future access to the west. He referred to the letter to the Council from David Brown dated July 17, 1981. Enger pointed out that Bennett Place will be extended and will become a through road; the Brown property will also have access to Blossom Road. Penzel asked if Hustad Development was prepared to submit to the City bonds for the construction of tot lots and sidewalk/trails. Putnam said they would provide what- ever the City asked. Sathre answered questions regarding the drainage of the pond in the southwest corner of Prairie East 6th Addition. A storm sewer would be placed under County Road 1, the cost of which is to be shared by Hustad (80%) and Olympic Hills (20%.) On the south side of County Road 1, Hustad Development would be responsible for the cost as part of their development costs. Bentley inquired about the right turn lane and by-pass lanes requested by the Hennepin County Highway Department at the intersection of Franlo and Pioneer Trail (County Road 1.) Putnam said that they will do that, if it is required to do so. Bentley asked how many units had driveways of less than 30' in length. Putnam said that they would meet the 30 requirement, if that was necessary. Penzel ques- tioned the lack of alignment of driveways off public streets. Putnam said on-street parking was not anticipated and off-set driveways would further tend to discourage that practice. 1593 City Council Minutes -5- July 21, 1981 Bob McDonald, owner of the property northwest of the proposed development and presently residing in Tucson, Arizona, said he had just recently become aware of the project. He would like to see a little higher quality unit in this area. He realizes, however, that the proposed units are now what will sell. He thanked City Staff for their help in familiarizing him with the proposal in a short period of time. Enger said steps will be taken to attempt to rectify the situations where a property owner who lives out of town does not receive notices of Public Hearings. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to close the Public Hearing and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance 81-11, rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Moved by Redpath, seconded by Bentley, to have Staff draft the developer's agreement including the recommendations contained in the June 19, 1981, Planning Staff Report, recommendations of the Planning Commission, recommendations of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, and bonding requirements for the construction of tot lots and sidewalks/trails. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to grant preliminary plat approval for 104 townhouses in the Bluff's East project. Motion carried unanimously. VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 7408 - 7631 MOTION: Moved by Redpath, seconded by Edstrom, to approve Payment of Claims Nos. 7408 - 7631. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen, and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. /II. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS A. Historical & Cultural Commission - Grill House • Director of Community Services Lambert explained this had been brought before the Historical & Cultural Commission and the Parks, Recreation and Natural Re- sources Commission and now the City Council because of a problem which has been recently encountered with the well at the Grill House. A renter has been living in the house and if this is to continue a new well must be drilled as the old one no longer works. The Historical & Cultural Commission recommended making the improvements and indicated they felt a well could be put in for less than $4,000. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended the City Council conduct an innediate survey of the community's feelings toward the expenditure of money to save the historic Grill House. Mona Finholt and Jeff Nolte, Middle School teachers,who have written a unit for 6th graders on the History of Eden Prairie, gave a presentation on their research on the Grill homestead as well as reasons for preserving the Grill House. Letters from 6th graders which urge the Council to "save the Grill House" are attached to these minutes. Finholt and Nolte said the House might be used for a research library, lecture hall, and/or a focus for community events such as Sunbonnet Days, as well as various classes such as quilting. Holte pointed out that it is even more historic because of the source material available -- 60 years of J.R. Cunnins' diaries (he built the house.) 1/50:1 City Council Minutes -6- July 21, 1981 Bruce Brill, member of the Historical & Cultural Commission, said the Commission recommends the well be redone and in the future the House be re- stored. In the meantime, it is essential that a renter be in the House. As the result of inquiries by various members of the Historical & Cultural Com- mission, it seems the potential for a new well at a nominal cost and other im- provements which are necessary might be done by local residents who are willing to donate time and/or materials. The Historical & Cultural Commission is willing to further investigate sources of materials and people who would be willing to donate their services to help in restoring the Grill House. They are also willing to look into various fund raising projects which might help to pay for the im- provements. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to authorize Staff to get quotes for a new well and electrical repairs at the Grill House. Motion carried unani- mously. VIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS, & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members Penzel - the United Nations Association has asked him to appoint an Eden Prairie UN Day Chairman. Dean Edstrom volunteered to serve in this capacity. B. Report of City Attorney City Attorney Pauly stated he, Jullie, Dietz, and Skoglund had conducted a field inspection of the site owned by Richard Anderson known as City West. It was determined that while three to four percent of the land had been altered, the land alteration Ordinance had not been violated because that Ordinance requires a permit in the event more the one foot of earth and 10% of the land is to be altered. Pauly suggested further consideration might be given to amending the Ordinance. The Watershed District has re- buked Anderson because of the erosion which is taking place due to the grading. Dietz showed slides of the area. Tangen suggested Staff check on how many parcels are included in the area under discussion. Penzel asked Pauly to see how the various Ordinances might be modified so situa- tions such as this might be avoided in the future. Jullie suggested supporting the Watershed District's action against Anderson. Pauly said he would include answers to the aforementioned in a memorandum to the Council. C. Report of City Manager City Manager Jullie reviewed the water situation. Notices have been sent to all Eden Prairie households outlining what the problems have been and what the sprinkling ban means. Expansion work which is underway at this time was also discussed in the letter. Residents have been cooperating; this is reflected in statistics on water usage which Water Plant Superinten- dent Ed Sorensen has been providing Jullie. t 6gS City Council Minutes -7- July 21, 1981 D. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Community Center Change Order Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to his memo of July 16, 1981, which addressed the situation involving the Community Center Concession Stand. Smiley Giotto* Associates is willing to pay the difference in cost ($806) of what would have been needed if it had been in the original bid instead of present costs. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Edstrom, to accept responsibility for the concession stand costs as they would have been at the time of the original bid. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen, and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 2. Flying Cloud Ballfield Road Access In his July 1, 1981, memo Director of Community Services Lambert addressed the traffic flow problem at Flying Cloud Ballfield. MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to authorize construction of an access road on the east side of Flying Cloud Ballfield at an estimated cost of $2,500.00. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom, Red- path, Tangen, and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 3. Community Center Tour MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to hold a special meet- ing of the Eden Prairie City Council at noon on Saturday, July 25, 1981, at which time a tour of the Community Center, which is under con- structionj will be conducted. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Senior Citizen's Center Gazebo Penzel explained the gazebo at the Senior Citizen's Center is in ill repair -- in need of screens and paint. Tangen wondered if this might be a project in which members of the community might like to help. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to look into the cost of renewing the gazebo at the Senior Citizen's Center. Motion carried unanimously. E. Report of City Engineer 1. Received petition and authorize preparation of Feasibility Report for drainage improvements north of Martin Drive, I.C. 52-007 (Resolution No. 81-139) City Engineer Dietz spoke to the problem which has precipitated this request. M.E. Lane, Jr., petitioner, also spoke to the problem. MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to continue this item to the August 4, 1981, Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. 169(r City Council Minutes -8- July 21, 1981 2. Water Saver Information on flow reducers for shower heads was shared with the Council and discussed. It was decided that this might be one of several measures residents of Eden Prairie might use to conserve water. MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to instruct Staff to come up with a program for water conservation. Motion carried unan- imously. IX. NEW BUSINESS There was none. X. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Tangen, seconded by Bentley, to adjourn the meeting at 10:20 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. i5°'1 UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL HUMAN RIGHTS AND SERVICES COMMISSION JOINT MEETING 7:30 PM, SENIOR CENTER Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath, and George Tangen Chairman Duane Pidcock, Fred Baumann, Stephen James, Marcia Lockman, Robert Norbert, Barbara O'Grady, and Larry Simenson Mary Hayden and Director R. Stricher City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Director of Communit Services Bob Lambert, Human Service Coordinators Jan Flynn and Rae Bly MONDAY, JULY 27, 1981 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: HUMAN RIGHTS AND SERVICES COMMISSION MEMBERS: SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: CITY STAFF PRESENT: ROLL CALL: George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, and Fred Baumann were absent, I. CALL TO ORDER Duane Pidcock, Chairman of the Human Rights and Services Commission, called the meeting to order at 7:45 p.m. II. DEFINITION OF PURPOSE IN MEETING Marcia Lockman, Chairman of the Community Consultation Committee for the Study of Human Service needs in South Hennepin expressed the Commission's desire to present the Council with an overview of the findings of the Study and to seek the Council's approval for the Commission's implementation plans. III. OVERVIEW OF STUDY Lockman reviewed the purpose of the Study which was -to examine health and social needs of residents in the four South Hennepin communities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina, and Richfield; -to determine unmet needs and to project future needs; -to develop short and long range priorities and to plan for service co- ordination, development, and implementation; and -to determine appropriate funding sources. 1697 Special Council/Human Rights & Services -2- July 27, 1981 The following thirteen broad areas of human services were addressed by the Study: -child/adult protection -personal public health -senior programs -chemical dependency -youth services -child care/day care -housing for special populations -mental health -information/referral and coordination -community/public education and prevention -financial/emergency assistance/welfare -mentally/physically disabled -tranportation (for special populations) The Study contained four major components: a demographic profile, an agency inventory, a general population survey, and a survey of key informants. In- formation from these components was reviewed by the various participants in the Study ; including the South Hennepin Human SerOces Council; the Area ,mide Study Advisory Committee and local Community Consultation Committees, Both the area-wide Study Advisory Committee and the local Community Consul- tation Committees reviewed information from the various components of the Study, formulated recommendations, and prioritized which service areas need the most attention. Lockman presented charts comparing the general population survey's prioritization of problems with the Study Advisory Committee and the Community Consultation Committee's ranking of services needing attention. General Population Survey Prioritization of Problems 1. Public transportation 2. Use of alcohol/drugs by youth 3. Availability of low and moderately priced housing (for people on fixed incomes) 4. Juvenile delinquency and vandalism 5. Divorce and family breakups 6. Finding child care (while parents work) 7. Pressure to succeed 9. Chemical dependency in adults 9. Transportation of elderly/disabled 10. Adult crime (e.g. burglary, assault, etc.) 11. Teenage pregnancy 12. Finding out about services (I & R) 13. Feelings of isolation/low self-esteem among suburban women 14. Elderly people who need help taking care of themselves/ their homes so as to remain independent 15-99 Special Council/Human Rights & Services -3- July 27, 1981 Ranking of Services Needing Attention Area-Wide Study Advisory Comm. Access to services and information 1 Prevention of chemical dependency and mental health problems 2 Coordination of services 3 Early identification/intervention in chemical dependency and mental health problems 5 Special transportation for the elderly and disabled 5 Housing for the elderly, disabled, and/or low income 5 Services to victims of family violence 7 Teenage pregnancy 9 Mental health sevices 9 Support to families caring for elderly/ disabled 9 Child care options 11 In-home services for elderly 11 Economic problems of elderly 11 Eden Prairie Community Con- sultation Comm. 5 1 3 5 2 7 11 8 12 13 5 11 16 IV. RECOMMENDATION FOR IMPLEMENTATION Pidcock presented an overview of the Commission's proposed plan for implementing the Study recommendations. The Commission's plan is to utilize the existing Community Based Services Board as the implementation task force, seeking mem- bership to include two representatives from the schools, two representatives from the business community, two City representatives (probably from the Human Rights and Services Commission), a representative from South Hennepin Human Services Council, and a City Staff liaison. Additional committees would be formed to work on specific areas, once this core group had defined implemen- tation priorities. Membership on these committees would include consumers (members of the general public.) The implementation process was discussed by the Council and Commission members. Council requested the Commission to further develop their criteria for the Community Based Services Board and its committees, to be presented at the Council's August 18, 1981, meeting, Council also requested an outline of the objectives of the Community Based Services Board, so that both the Council and the Commission would have a common understanding of the tasks to be performed. V. ADJOURNMENT Pidcock adjourned the meeting at 8:45 p.m. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, JULY 27, 1981 COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER, 9:00 PM Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath, and George Tangen City Manager Carl J. Jullie and Director of Community Services Bob Lambert ROLL CALL: Dean Edstrom was absent The Council, after meeting with the Human Rights and Services Com- mission, considered quotes on a new well and electrical service re- pairs to be made at the Grill House, MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to accept the low bid of Associated Well for installation of a 6" well at a cost of $5,571 and the low bid of Prairie Electric at a cost of $1,075 for electrical repairs. The funding for this project will be divided on a 50/50 basis between the General Fund and Cash Park Fees, Roll call vote: Bentley, Redpath, Tangen, and Penzel voted "aye", Motion carried unanimously. MEMORANDUM TO: THRU: FROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Carl Jullie, City Manager Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services July 31, 1981 SUBJECT: Extension of Bid Period on Round Lake Playground Equipment Staff originally proposed receiving bids for the Round Lake playground structure on July 30, 1981. Subsequent to advertising for that equip- ment, staff has moved the location of the play equipment approximately 50 feet north of the of the original proposed site. This change in site will require some change in the proposed equipment due to the contour of the land. Staff requests approval to extend the bid Period to receive bids on August 13, 1981 at 10:00 a.m. and to authorize an addendum to the original proposal. Cost of the play equipment is not expected to increase. This play equip- ment is being provided by the Eden Prairie Lions Club. BL:md MEMORANDUM TO: THRU: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Bob Lambert, Director of Community ServicesT*-- Stephen Calhoon, Park Planner July 30, 1981 Irrigation System - Round Lake Park On Thursday, July 30, 1981, at 10:30 am., staff received and opened bids for the Irrigation System at Round Lake Park. This irrigation system will cover the southern four softball fields. The following bids were received and opened: Aqua Engineering $11,247 Sprinkler Systems Installations 16,690 Southview Irrigation Systems 18,300 Natural Green 18,925 Staff recommends that Aqua Engineering be awarded the bid at $11,247. SC:md 1603 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resurces Commission THRU: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services FROM: Stephen Calhoon, Park Planner DATE: July 30, 1981 SUBJECT: Bids for Staring take Park and Red Rock Lake Park On July 30, 1981, staff received, opened and publicly read bids for grading at Staring Lake Park and Red Rock Lake Park. The following bids were received: Enebak Construction $73,812 W.J. Ebertx Grading 80,682.50 Brown and Chris 94,700 UD Contracting 94,953.25 Progressive Contractors 96,585 Busse Construction 98,326 C.S. McCrossan 121,730 Arcon Construction 122,938 Sandmark 133,670.50 Staff recommends the contract be awarded to Enebak aonstruction Co. for $73,812. Funding for this project is from the 1979 Park Bond Referendum. This project is to be completed by October 15, 1981. Staff estimated this project at $86,000. SC:md Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Service 's—PI-- DATE: July 31, 1981 SUBJECT: Round Lake Park Shelter Change Order Request The final design of the Round Lake Park Shelter included four walls with windows, each wall having three four foot by four foot windows with the middle 4x4 window a slide window. These windows had tempered glass on the outside, plate glass on the inside, as well as a wire mesh screen on the outside for pro- tection. When bidding these windows the contractor made several good points. 1. The 4x4 double pane window is very heavy for a sliding window and he would suggest making all panes 2'x4 rather than 4x4. We will have less maintenance on the sliding window, as well as a lower cost if any of the windows are broken. 2. He suggested double panes of tempered glass because of the possibility of those windows being broken from the inside, as well as from the outside. 3. He also suggested changing the window from the office to the multi-purpose room from plate glass to tempered glass for the same reason. Staff has concurred with these recommendations and is recommending a change order to that affect. A copy of that change order is attached with the net cost to the City of $1,907. BL:md SMILEY GLOTTER ASSOCIATES AlICKTECTS ENOINEF.ILS MANN& OS 10211 ASA! IC AVENUE 612 3321401 MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55403 CHANGE ORDER AIA DOCUMENT C701 OWNTR ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR FIELD OTHER DATE cm' of BY_ PROJECT: Eden Prairie Park Shelter. Olame,addresslCity of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road TO (Contractqd en Prair ie,MN 55343 r- Jordahl Construction Co. 16840 Dayton River Road Dayton, MN 55327 CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 3 July 29, 1981 -1 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 8002 -D CONTRACT FOR: All Constructi. 1 CONTRACT DATE: March 16, 1981 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: All work necessary to modify the aluminum window frames and glazing: 1. Milco W-21T Aluminum frames with 1" insulated tempered glass 2. One (1) extra 1" insulated tempered glass unit (spare) 3. 1/4" tempered glass for interior office view window + $4424.00 + $ 95.00 + $ 75.00 4. Original contract allowance 5. 7 1/2% Contractor Fee 6. Total Add - $2820.00 Sub-total $1774.00 133.00 $1907.00 The original Contract Sum was 149,775.00 Net change by previous Change Orders $ 3,243.00 The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order was $ 153,018.00 The Contract Sum will be (Increased) (ekzecer6Rcil*ofickiroglx0 by this Change Order. 1,907.00 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be $ 154,925.00 The Contract Time will be BoxteamtdiXdriserockste/1 (unchanged) by I 1 Days. The Date of Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is Smi icy.. G1OttcC_2\SSODiatO5 AREHITICT 1021 LaSa11e_hvenue__ Address Minneapol's,_MN 55403 Jordalh Construction Co. ..C.ity_of_E.den TOnllavton_Rive r Road lOgk Eden Prairie Road Address Addre - Daytorb_ MN 55327 Eden Prairie, MN 55343 Y BY DATE DATE 160 AIA DOCUMINT C701 • CtIANC! ORDIR • APR?! 1970 WIDON • AIA90 • Cn 1970 • THE AMIRICAN it.srstuts of ARUIItICtS . 1755 NIW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINC1ON, DC, 20006 ONE PAGE August 4, 1981 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO, R81-148 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS • AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the City Engineer, through Rieke Carroll Muller Assoc. has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements to wit: I.C. 51-409, Valley Place Offices and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in the City Engineer's office. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The adver- tisement shall be published for 2week(s), shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be opened at 10:00 o'clock A.M. on Thursday, August 27, 1981 and considered by the Council at 7:30 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, September 1, 1981 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL . John D. Franc, Clerk • MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager DATE: July 30, 1981 RE: Water Meter Bids, I.C. 52-003 The following bids were received at 10:00 A.M. on July 30, 1981: I. Davies Water Equipment (Neptune meters) $26,1.55.00 2. Water Products Company (Rockwell Meters) $26,950.00 The bidding on the project was quite keen. In fact, the meters were bid only lt higher than last year's bid (1980 equals $39.47, 1981 equals 139.48). Davies Water Equipment supplied the meters last year and we had no particular service problems etc. It is therefore recommended that the contract be awarded to Davies Water Equipment in the amount of $26,155.00. August 4, 1981 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. R81-149 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the fol l o w i n g Improvements: I.C. 52-003, Water Meters bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. T h o s e b i d s r e c e i v e d are shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends award of contract to Davies Water Equipment as the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Cou n c i l as follows: The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and direc t e d to enter into a contract with Davies Water Equipment • In the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of $26,155.00 In accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the Council and on file In the office of the City Engineer. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on lloligang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Franc, City Clerk 1609 MEMO • TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager DATE: July 30, 1981 RE: Bids for 1981 Seal Coat Project I.C.52-002 The following is a bid tabulation for the seal coat project as o ened at 10:00 A.M. on July 30, 1981: 1. Allied Blacktop $56,656.00 2. Dust Coating Inc. $58,332.00 3. Blacktop Services $61,190.00 4. Minnesota Roadways $62,385.00 Allied Blacktop did our seal coat project in 1980 and performed in accordance with the specifications. I therefore recommend that the 1981 project be awarded to Allied Blacktop in the amount of $56,656.00. August 4, 1981 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 1181-150 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following Improvements: I.C. 52-002, Seal Coating Project bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received are shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends award of contract to Allied Blacktop as the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter in .6:) a contract with Allied Blacktop In the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of $56,656.00 in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Franc, City Clerk 1611 John D. Franc, Clerk August 4, 1981 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. R 81-151 RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT , I.C. 52-008, Golden Ridge Utility Improvements WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed to mak e the following improvements; ,Sanitary Sewer and Water Main and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the c o s t o f t h e Improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council : That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Enginee r for study with the assistance of and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and presented t o the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment and feasi- bility of the proposed improvements. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on 'Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Names of Petitioners (Must Be Property Owners) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT To The Eden Prairie City Council: The undersigned property owners herein petition the Eden Prairie City Council to consider making the following described. haprovements(s): (General Location) Sanitary Sewer Watermain Storm Sewer, Street Paving Other Cl 0 LI)E. '-n-)1IC-7E-- rok. Street Address or Other Legal Description of Property to be Served 6609. 11An oA. -RDAD 4;/5- SW& 11//47/42.g.--0-J-- (,‘e / -2)4 601(1,,A,Bdie-2)2.- G1-1- Go VAke- (,,z/ ,a< -LE (For City Use) Date Received 7/2o/6/ Project No. Council Consideration it. )2n 615.6 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT To The Eden Prairie City Council: The undersigned property owners herein petition the Eden Prairie Ci t y Council to consider making the following described improvements(s): (General Location) Sanitary Sewer Watermain Storm Sewer Street Paving Other Street Address or Other Legal Description of Property to be Served 6 6 V _2 iYe Names of Petitioners (Must Be Pro.erty Owners) 27?tz_64 sld (For City Use) Date Received Project No. Council Consideration MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager DATE: July 30, 1981 RE: 100% Petition for Improvements at 7661 Atherton Way The attached petition is for a sanitary sewer and water service for the captioned address. The estimated cost is provided to the property owners was set at $4,190.00. Since this is under the $10,000.00 limit, the resolution asks that you allow informal bids to be taken for the project and that the work proceed upon consent to receive the petition and authorize the work to be performed. August 4, 1981 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. R81-152 RESOLUTION RECEIVING 100% PETITION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS FOR 7661 Atherton Way, I.C. 52-009 BE IT kESOLVED of the Eden Prairie City Council: 1. The owners of 100% of the real property abutting upon and to be benefitted from the proposed Sanitary Sewer and Water Main at an estimated total cost of $4,190.00 have petitioned the City Council to construct said improvements and to assess the entire cost against their property. 2. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3 and upon recommendation of the City Engineer, said improvements are hereby ordered and such work shall be added, per the unit bid prices, to Improvement Contract 52-009. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on ATTEST: Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE; MINNESOTA 100% PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: The undersigned are all the fee owners of the real property described below and herein petition for the Eden Prairie City Council to proceed with making the following described improvements: (General Location) .)‹ Sanitary Sewer 76 6 / -04.270„/ (N4 y ' X Watermain 4 Storria::Sewer Streets:Paving Other ' Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the undersigned hereby waive any public hearing to be held on said improvements, and further state and agree that the total cost of said improvements shall be specially as- sessed against the property described below in accordance with the City's special assessment policies. We further understand that the preliminary, estimated total cost for the said improvements i0/ 4/, /410, . Street Address or other Legal Description of Property to be Served Names and addresses of Petitioners (Must be owners of record) I qTiOvf,--6,-) 04? 6(4 -) r of" eft?, )4-14z S,12SY (For city Use) Date Received Project No. 1(211 CouirCil Consideration August 4, 1981 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO.R 81-153 RESOLUTION RECEIVING 100% PETITION, ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS & PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CPT/EATON/ SGL/CPA ROAD PROJECT, I.C. 52-010 BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: 1. The owners of 100% of the real property abutting upon an d to be benefitted from the proposed road project for CPT/ Eaton/SGL/CPA have petitioned the City Council to construct said improvem e n t s and to assess the entire cost against their property. 2. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, and upon recommendatio n of the City Engineer, said improvements are hereby ordered and the City Engineer shall prepare plans and specification s for said improvements in accordance with City standards and advertise for bids thereon. 3. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the City Clerk is he r e b y directed to publish a copy of this resolution once in the official newspaper, and further a contract for constructio n of said improvements shall not be approved by the City Cou n c i l prior to 30 days following publication of this resolution in the City's official newspaper. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie o n Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Franc, CliFk 1611 CITY OP EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 100% PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: The undersigned are all the fee owners of the real property as shown on the drawing attached as Exhibit A, and herein petition for the Eden Prairie City Council to proceed to design, construct, and, upon completion, accept for public use and maintain a new road from Mitchell Road west along the northern edge of the CPT property at 8100 Mitchell Road to a cul-de-sac located at the NW corner of the CPT property, the NE corner of the SGL property, and the SE corner of the Eaton property, as indicated on the drawing attached as Exhibit A to this Petition. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the undersigned hereby waive any public hearing to be held on said improvements, and further state and agree that the total cost of said improvements shall be specially assessed 50% against the property identified below of CPT Corporation and 50% against the property identified below of SGL Ipcorporated in accordance with the Agreement entered into on the 9Ark day of , 1981, between the Undersigned parties, attached hereto as Exhibit B to this Petition. CPT Corporation and SGL Incorporated hereby acknowledge that the benefit to their respective properties Will be not -less thaa 50% of the total cost of Construction of the new read and agree that the of Eden Prarie may assess up to 50% of the -AOtal obSt Of Con- struction to their respective properties pursuant to M.S.A„ 421.061, CPT Corporation and SGL Incorporated further Waive all rights- which they may have under M.S.A. 429,061, or which they may otherwise have, to appeal or challenge the amount or validity of the assessments made against their respective properties pursuant to this Petition, EATON CORPORATION 100 Erie View Plaza Cleveland, Ohio 44114 Pee owner of the property identified as Hennepin County Tax Identification No. 6-116-2 2-001 By \1/ W.E.- Butler -Its nrnmp virp Prpoidont SGL INCORPORATED 5824 West 68th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Fee owner of the property identified as Hennepin County Tax Identification No. 16-116-22-13-0003 BY It ig//Z'oli CPT CORPORATION 8100 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55440 Pee Owner of the property identified as Hennepin County Tax Identification No.46-116=g2-10,-0001 /619 'COOPERATIVE POWER ASSOCIATION 3316 West 66th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Fee Owner of the property identified as Hennepin County Tax Identification No. 16-116-22-11-/0,4", AO MP By Its (For City Use) Date Received Project No. Council Consideration 1620 t SEC.15,T116-R22 P N4k1 Go t. .., . (w) soNr.64.......,6 fit- Ipow,k P,‘ 16g1 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of this 9 11 day of -oty , 1981, by and between CPT Corporation (CPT), SGL Incorporated (SOL), Eaton Corporation (Eaton), and Cooperative Power Association (CPA). WHEREAS, CPT owns certain property located at the northwest corner of Scenic Heights and Mitchell Roads in the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the CPT property), identified as Hennepin County Tax Identification No. 16-116-22-14-0001, SGL owns certain property to the west of and adjacent to the CPT property (the SGL property), identified as Hennepin County Tax Identification No. 16-116-22-13-0003, Eaton owns certain property to the northwest and adjacent to the CPT property (the Eaton property), identified as Hennepin County Tax Identification No. 16-116-22-12-0001, and CPA owns certain property to the north of and adjacent to the CPT property (the CPA property), identified as Hennepin County Tax Identification No. 16-116-22-11-0006; and WHEREAS, CPT desires to construct an addition to their existing building and a new parking lot on the CPT property; and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie (the City) has advised that the CPT addition and parking lot will require that a new access road to the proposed parking lot, running from Mitchell Road along the northern edge of the CPT property (the new road), be constructed; and WHEREAS, the new road, if extended beyond the CPT property line, will benefit, in addition to the CPT property, the SGL property and the Eaton property; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, agree- ments, undertakings and conditions contained herein, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows; 1. Each of the parties will join in and sign a petition (the petition) in the form attached as Exhibit A to this Agreement, to be submitted by CPT to the City requesting that the City design, construct and, upon completion, accept for public use and maintain the new road. 2. The petition will request that the City construct the new road from Mitchell Road west along the northern edge of the CPT property to a cul-de-sac located at the northwest corner of the CPT property, the northeast corner of the SGL property, and the southeast corner of the Eaton property, as indicated on the drawing attached as Exhibit 13 to this Agreement. 3. The petition will request that the new road be designed and constructed by the City, and that the cost of construction be assessed fifty percent (50%) against the CPT property and fifty percent (50%) against the SGL property. 4. The petition will request that the City design and construct the cul-de-sac at the western end of the new road in such a manner that CPT, SGL and Eaton each have access to the cul-de-sac and/or the new road at their respective property lines, and that such access be sufficient to permit construction on the respective properties. S. In exchange for access to the new road CPT agrees to pay fifty percent (50%) of the assessed cost of the construction of the new road and to dedicate to the City such property as is necessary for the new road including the cul-de-sac and the necessary right- of-way. 6. In exchange for access to the new road SGL agrees to pay fifty percent (501) of the assessed cost of construction of the new road and to dedicate to the City such property as is necessary for the new road including the cul-de-sac and necessary right-of-way. 7. In exchange for access to the new road Eaton agrees to dedicate to the City, following construction of the new road, Parcel H, as described in the petition and drawing attached thereto, consisting of 2.4 acres, and such additional property as is necessary for the new road including the cul-de-sac and the necessary right-of-way. 8. In exchange for CPA's agreement to support construction of the new road and to join the petition, the parties agree that CPA -2- CPT CORPORATION By 1 1 .40; ots SGL INCORPORATED BY Its EATON CORPORATION Group Vice President Its COOPERATIVE POWER ASS By Its -3- TION 42 q will incur no expenses related to construction of the new road unless and until such time as CPA requests and receives access onto the new road. If CPA receives access onto the new road in the future, CPA agrees at that time to reimburse CPT and SGL, or their respective successors, thirty-three percent (33%) of the cost including interest attributable thereto at the rate provided in the assessment roll assessed to each the CPT property and the SGL property for construction of the new road. 9. It is understood and agreed by and between the parties that this Agreement is expressly conditioned upon the City agreeing to assess the cost of the new road pursuant to the formula set forth in Paragraph 3 of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. August 4, 1981 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. R81-154 RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR EDEN ROAD IMPROVEMENTS I.C. 52-011 WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed to make the following improvements; I.C. 52-011, Eden Road Improvements and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the Improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study with the assistance of and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and presented to the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment and feasi- bility of the proposed improvements. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on V6Ifgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk IG2S Tom Median Ernest Martin Names of PepitiOne (Must Be Propelty-Own Frank Cardarelle Bermel-Smaby Richard Vosmek M-a4,6a/ CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT To The Eden Prairie City Council: The undersigned property owners herein petition the Eden Prairie City Council to consider making the following described improvements(s): (General Location) Sanitary Sewer Watermain Storm Sewer . Street Paving Eden Road X Other Street Curbing Street Address or Other Legal Description of Property to be Served 8140 Flying Cloud Drive 8110 Eden Road 8108 Eden Road 8102 Eden Road 8042 Eden Road 8034 Eden Road 8025 Eden Road 8018 Eden Road 8010 Eden Road 7942 Eden Road 7936 Eden Road ' John K. Teman fib Robert R. Kooiman 79 28 R!len Road American Baptist (For City Use) Date Received Project No. Council Consideration August 4, 1981 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. R81-155 APPROPRIATION OF MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUNDS TO T.H. 169 and ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisable and necessary for the Cit y of Eden Prairie to participate in the cost of a construction pro j e c t l o c a t e d at T.H. 169 and Anderson Lakes Parkway within the limits of said m u n i c i p a l i t y , a n d ; WHEREAS, said construction project has been designed by the Depa r t m e n t of Transportation (S.P. 2744-39), I.C. 51-341B. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: that we do hereby appropriate fr o m our Municipal State Aid Street Funds the sum of $20,000.00 to ap p l y t o w a r d the design, construction and right-of-way acquisition of said p r o j e c t a n d request the Commissioner of Highways to approve this authorizati o n . ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 4, 1981. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor . ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk August 4, 1981 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. R81-156 RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A HEARING I.C. 52-004 WHEREAS, a report ha: ueen given by the City Engineer to the City Council on August4, 1981, recommending the following improvements to wit: I.C. 52-004, Drainage Improvements in the vicinity of 69th Street between Washington Ave. and Shady Oak Rd. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: 1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of property abutting or within said boundaries for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to M.S.A. Sect. 420-011 to 429.111, at an estimated total cost of the improvements as shown. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 1st day of September, 1981,at 7:30 P.M. at the Eden Prairie City Hall. The City Clerk shall give published and mailed notice of such hearing on the improvements as required by law. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA WATER WORKS IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 51-354 CONTRACT NO. 1 WATER SUPPLY WELLS NO. 4, NO. 5 AND NO. 6 CHANCE ORDER NO. 2 I. SCOPE This Change Order No. 2 deletes the fencing work from Well No. 4 and No. 5. II. ORDER The chain link fence around Well Houses No. 4 and No. 5, as shown on the drawings, shall be deleted from Contract No. 1. The chain link fence around Well House No. 6 shall remain unchanged. III. CHANCE IN CONTRACT AMOUNT The adjustment in the contract amount resulting from this Change Order No. 2 is a decrease of $4,514.00. The net change to the contract amount is sum- marized as follows: Contract Price Including Change Order No. I Change Order No. 2 $647,502.00 - (4,514.00) New Contract Price $642,988.00 IV. ACCEPTANCE The changes and conditions as set forth in the above Change Order No. 2 are hereby accepted. A&K CONSTRUCTION, INC. Contractor CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA Owner By By Mayo r Date Date By City Manager Date (EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN.) (WATER SUPPLY WELLS ) CO2-1 Clifton V. Hostetler I . . T DIRE.C1011 L. BLACK & VEATCH TEL. (913)967.2000 CONSULTING ENGINEERS TELEX 42.6263 Eden Prairie, Minnesota Water Supply Wells Contract No. 1 1500 MEADOW LAKE PARKWAY MAILING ADOPM. P.O. OOP NO, 1401 KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64114 B&V Project 9082.CPS B&V File G-1.0 July 24, 1981 Mr. Gene Dietz Director of Public Works City Offices 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Mr. Dietz: Enclosed for your review are five copies of Change Order No. 2 for the subject project. Change Order No. 2 covers the deletion of the chain link fence around Well Houses No. 4 and No. 5 as earlier requested by Gene Schurman. A&K Construction has offered to reduce the contract amount by $4,514.00 and the enclosed change order is written for that amount. We believe this amount is a fair reflection of the cost of the deleted work, however, we suspect that profit and overhead factors have not been included in the deduct. Under the circumstances, we do not have leverage to negotiate a lower price. If the Change Order No. 2 meets with your approval, please have it executed and forward five (5) copies to A&K Construction, Inc. for their signature. Please instruct A&K Construction to distribute the copies of the change order as follows: one copy to the City of Eden Prairie, one copy to the Surety, one copy to Jim Schnurr, one copy to Black & Veatch in Kansas City, and one copy for their records. Very truly yours, BLACK & VEATCH Enclosure cc: Mr. Ed Sorensen Mr. Jim Schnurr TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John D. Frane, Finance Director DATE: July 31, 1981 Re: Revenue Sharing Hearing Our revenue sharing allocation for 1982 should be approximately $154,828. In previous years the City has committed these funds for current expenses of the Public Safety Department, one of the uses permitted under Federal Regulations. I suggest, as an ex- pediency, we do the same for our 1982 allocation. 1660 August 4, 1981 TATE OF MINNESOTA 1TY OF EDEN PRAIRIE OUNTY OF HENNEPIN he following_ accounts were audited and_alloweLasiollows: 543 VOID OUT CHECK '632 KRIS KRYSTOFIAK '633 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR '634 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. 635 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. 636 TWIN CITY WINE CO. 637 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. 638 MIDWEST WINE CO. '639 THE LIQUOR HOUSE '640 OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. '641 SHAKOPEE SPORTS '642 HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE /643 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES '644 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK 1 645 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 7646 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE /647 VOID OUT CHECK 1648 SEVER PETERSON 7649• CHEAP SKATE 1650 FIRE MARSHALL ASSOC. OF MINNESOTA 7651 STEPHEN SULLIVAN 7652 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO. 7653 PAUSTIS & SONS 7654 TWIN CITY WINE CO. 7655 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. 7656 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE 7657 OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. 7658 MIDWEST WINE CO. 7659 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. 7660 HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE 7661 DON OMODT, HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF 7662 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK 7663 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 7664 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 7665 AETNA LIFE & ANNUITY CO 7666 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS 7667 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK 7668 PERA 7669 MCDONALDS 7670 ADVENIURE VAN OMEN, INC. 7671 ALBERT LEA FIRE DEPARTMENT 7672 DENNIS ALBRECHT 767? STUART ALEXANDER 7674 AMERICAN POP CORN COMPANY 7675 EARL F. ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES 7676 ANKLAM'S AQUATICS 7677 KATIE ASKTUND 7678 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT, INC. $(14.00) Expenses-Playground 56.95 Liquor 2,498.94 Liquor 4,705.72 Wine 1,066.35 Wine 837.46 Liquor 5,756.35 Wine 1,231.01 Liquor 942.49 Liquor 1,248.82 Supplies-Park Dept. 40.06 Fee-Rec Dept. 5.00 Fee-Engineering Dept. 40.00 Valley Fair tickets-Rec Dept. 326.80 Sales tax 4,970.13 Fuel tax 221.65 Refund-Building Dept. 25.00 ' Expenses-Rec Dept. 84.00 Conference-Fire Dept. 35.00 Tuition reimbursement-Community Services 50.50 Wine 31.75 Wine 309.51 Wine 983.28 Liquor 2,382.32 Liquor 2,199.90 Wine 949.62 Wine 798.40 Liquor 2,735.94 Fee-Rec Dept. 5.00 Legal Service 113.49 Payroll 16,895.52 Payroll 5,843.17 Payroll 17,768.40 Payroll 165.00 Payroll 46.96 Payroll 175.00 Payroll 10,874.29 Expenses-Rec Dept. 8.50 Window-Animal Control 170.00 Conference-Fire Dept. 150.00 Softball official 44.00 Mileage 47.00 Popcorn-Rec Dept. 17.00 Signs 132.60 Lifeguard equipment-Park Dept. 100.50 Refund-Rec Dept. 6.40 Blacktop 12,405.75 191 Pa! two AEt 4, 1981 7679 ASSOCIATED WELL DRILLERS, INC. 7680 BRW 7681 DENIS BILLMYER 7682 BLACK & VEATCH 7683 YBLOONINGION LOCKSMITH COMPANY 7684 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. 7685 MIKE BUSHARD 7686 BUSINESS FURNITURE, INC. 7687 BUTCH'S BAR SUPPLY 7683 CENTEX HOMES 7689 CHEMLAWN 7690 BONNIE CLAY ES 7691 CLUTCH & U-JOINT BURNSVILLE, INC. 7692 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 7693 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. 7694 CUSTOM DESIGNED AWARDS 7695 CUTLER-PAGNER COMPANY 7695 DIANE DEMARIO 7( EUGENE A. DIETZ 760 DISPLAY FIXTURES COMPANY 7699 KNOX LUMBER 7700 DORHOLT PRINTING 7701 DRISKILL'S SUPER VALU 7702 DUSTCOATING, INC. 7703 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPARTMENT 7704 EDEN PRAIRIE SANITATION CO. 7705 CHRIS ENGER 7706 EVERS HEILING INC. 7707 FABRITEK 7708 FAIRVIEW COMMUNITY HOSPITALS 7709 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, INC. 77104 GATEWAY SAFETY PRODUCTS 7711 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ru"' 7712 GOPHER SIGN CO. 7713 GRAPHIC SPECIALTIES, INC. 7714 HARMON GLASS 7715 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 7716 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 7717 GINGER HUHN 7718 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE/BUILDING 7719 INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER CO. 7720 DAN JENSEN 7721 JORDAIR CONSTRUCTION CO. 7( CARL JUILIE 77z3 KAPAK CORPORATION 7724 KARULF HARDWARE, INC. 7725 JOSEPH KASID 7726 TOM KEEFE 7727 KEVIN M. KOHLS Service 38. Service-Eden Road, Schooner Blvd., Leona 6,485. Road, Dell Road, TH #5 & W 78th Street & Mitchell Road, Anderson Lakes Parkway, Homeward Hills Road Softball official Service-Water Treatment Plant Repair locks-Water Dept. Service-Luther Way Refund-Rec Dept. Chair frames-Police Dept. Supplies-Liquor Stores Refund-Building Dept. Service Refund-Rec Dept. Cable-Forestry Dept. Service-Traffic Signals TH 169 Supplies-Engineering Dept. Plaques-Community Services Quicklime-Water Dept. Refund-Rec Dept. Expenses Shelves-Liquor Store Paint-Park Dept. Office supplies Supplies-Rec Dept. Oil roads Conference-Fire Dept. Service Expenses Supplies-Liquor store Refund-Sewer Dept. Tests Ta orestry Dept. -Police Dept. ipment repair & parts Equipment-Water Dept. Signs-City Hall Windshield-Police Dept. Bulbs, shovel-Street Dept. Board of Prisoners Refund-Rec Dept. Dues-Building Dept. Equipment rental-Park Dept. Softball official .Scrvice-Eden Prairie Park Shelter Expenses Evidence pouches-Police Dept. Supplies Softball official Softball official Softball official 154. 5,675. 80. ' 145. 3. 283. 305. 275. 314. 24. F. 37. . 20,921..1 309. 101. . 3,149. . 14. 151. 308. 30. ; 333.. ; 121. 2,880. : 1,033. 90.1 152. 82. 132. 50. . 40. 401. 174. 154. 64.' 140. 148. 1,080. 24. 50.1.; 1,814. 1 55.; ! 28,813.. ! 120.1 132.; i 6;32 'age three VigL. 4, 1981 7778 KOKFSH ATHLETIC & GOLF SUPPLY 7729 CAROLYN KORBEL 7730 EDWARD KRAEMER & SONS, INC. 7731 LOGIS 7732 LUND PAINTING & DECORATING, INC. 7733 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 7734 MAGNEY CONSTRUCTION 7735 ROBERT N. MARTZ 7736 MATT'S AUTO SERVICE, INC. 7737 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIPMENT 7733 MID-CENTRAL FIRE INC. 7739 METROPOLITAN FIRE EQUIPMENT CO. 7740 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION 7741 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION 7742 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION 7743 MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY 7744 MINNESOTA TORO, INC. 7745 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP 7746 MINTER BROS. 7747 ED MORIMOTO 7748 NATIONAL CIVIC REVIEW 7749 NATIONWIDE LIGHTING, INC. 775i 11NEW ENGLAND BUSINESS SERVICE, INC. 7751 'NORCOSTCO, INC. 7752 NSP 7753 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 7754 O'CONNOR & HANNAN 7755 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE 7756 GARY OTTERDAHL 7757 OXFORD CHEMICALS, INC. 7758 PARTICK PEREZ 7759 POMMER MEG. CO ., INC. 7760 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 7761 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING, INC. 7762 JAMES PUFAHL 7763 CHUCK PUFAHL 7764 REGISTER MEDIA, INC. 7765 RIDGE DOOR SALES COMPANY OF MINNESOTA 7766 DAVID ROBBINS 7767 PAUL ROGERS 7768 RYAN RUBBER STAMPS 7769 ST. REGIS PAPER COMPANY 7770 SCHMITT MUSIC CENTERS 7771 JEFFREY SCHUCHMAN 7772 KATHY SCHUMACHER R. N. 7773 SEARS 777P BRIAN SIEVERISON 777. SNOWURIFTERS SNOWMOBILE CLUB 7776 IMOGENE SORVICK 7777 SOUTHWEST TRAILS 7778 SPECIALTY SCREENING 7779 STATE TREASURER Supplies-Forestry Dept. Refund-Roc Dept. Rock-Rec Dept. Service Paint-Liquor Store Cable-Street Dept. Service-Eden Prairie Community Center Expenses Towing Service Oxygen-Fire Dept. Equipment-Fire Dept. Annual service-Fire extinguishers Sewer Service June 1981 SAC Charges Blacktop Service Tires, Equipment repairs & parts Service Candy bars-Rec Dept. Softball official Subscription Bulbs-Public Works Portable desks-Water Dept. 0. Supplies-Rec Dept. Service Service Legal service Chains-Street Dept. Softball official Chemicals-Street Dept. Softball official Supplies-Rec Dept. Repairs-Park Dept. Signs-Street Dept. Softball official Softball official Ads-Liquor Stores Equipment repair & parts Refund-Rec Dept. Service-Round Lake Stamp-Engineering Dept Lumber-Park Dept. Supplies-Rec Dept. Refund-Rec Dept. Tests Shelves-Park Dept. Softball official fee-Park Dept. Refund-Rec Dept. Fee-Park Dept. Emblems-Animal Control 2nd quarter Building permit 17.96 28.00 171.08 4,210.48 300.00 27.44 8,550.00 165.95 28.00 19.00 1,211.04 239.85 40,314.06 33,239.25 375.34 596.92 339.85 19.25 672.65 77.00 29.00 421.34 114.24 24.50 11,023.43 143.89 2,091.35 247.47 33.00 76.82 99.00 357.59 497.00 177.00 66.00 110.00 118.00 52.70 8.00 97.50 6.00 711.50 27.40 8.00 150.00 110.28 44.00 1,856.25 24.00 458.21 128.00 6,418.03 16,33 'age four Aigu. 4, 1981 780 DON STREICHER GUNS, INC. 781 DAVID STUTELBERG 782 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 783 SULLIVANS SERVICES, INC. '784 )(.TAMS-WITMARK MUSIC LIBRARY '785 CARRIE TIETZ 786 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED F787 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE 788 STORYTALERS 1 789 ALIPSA VALENTINE 1790 VALLEY EQUIPMENT CO. 1791 VAN WATERS & ROGERS 7792 WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY 7793 PAUL WELIN 1794 HELMUT WENSHAU 7795 XEROX CORPORATION 7796 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC. 7797 MARGARET DUFFY 7798 ROBERT LAMBERT 7799 STEVEN LAUMANN 78OO PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING, INC. 7801 RICK RABENORT 7802 JOHN M. RICHARDSON 7803 KRISTI RODBERG 7804 SMILEY BLOTTER ASSOCIATED 7805 TOWNS EDGE FORD, INC. 7806 LISA VAN ASTEN 7807 SANDRA WERTS 7808 WEST CENTRAL INDUSTRIES, INC. 7809 RIVERS EDGE TUBING 7810 STEVEN CALHOON 7811 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 7812 HIRSCH BROS., INC. 7813 MINNESOTA CASH REGISTER 7814 COMPUTER ELECTION SYSTEM Equipment parts 89.70 Softball official 99.00 Equipment repairs & parts 48.76 Service 50.00 Equipment rental-Park Dept. 833.50 Service 47.50 Supplies-Police Dept. 125.70 Book-Park Dept. 34.00 Fee-Rec Dept. 170.00 Refund-Rec Dept 1.50 Filter-Park Dept. 34.90 Chlorine-Water Dept. 358.20 Gauge,Valve-Water Dept. 179.32 Softball official 77.00 Softball official 132..00 Service 211.._92 Office supplies 93.17 Refund-Rec Dept. 14.00 Expenses 153.25 Refund-Rec Dept. 20.00 Forms-Water Dept. 223.00 Expenses 42.58 Refund-Rec Dept. 24.00 Refund-Rec Dept. 14.00 Service-Eden Prairie Community Center 1,442,82 Equipment repair-Park Dept. 21.50 Refund-Rec Dept. 14..00 Mileage 49.50 Stakes-Engineering Dept. 442.00 Expenses-Teen Volunteer 84.50 Mileage 31.37 Service 4,850.00 Service-Senior Citizens Storage Bldg. 2,463.00 Cash register-Liquor Store/Preserve 2,226.60 Maintenance agreement-Election Equipment 255.00 TOTAL $307,498.32 oq ADOPTED by the Development Commission this 29th day of July, 1981. , Pierce, Chairman evelopment Commission OS' RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION REGARDING DEVELOPMENT COSTS WHEREAS, the Development Commission has received and discussed the Development and Housing Status June 1981 and other reports generated by City Staff, and WHEREAS, the housing costs are projected to continue to rise drastically, and WHEREAS, the percentage of people capable of affording the typical single family home is becoming smaller and smaller each year, and WHEREAS, it is important to the people of Eden Prairie to continue development in both residential and industrial-commercial in order to continue with a stable tax base and reduce trunk utility debt, WE RESOLVE THAT: Higher density be allowed in residential development and the two units per acre requirement be rescinded; The City Council and Commissions keep the benefits to the community as a whole in mind when considering Development and/or rezoning and not be swayed to deny by pressure from neighborhood groups; To continue with the present policy of granting Developers the right to improve land through special assessments; To continue the process of Industrial Revenue Bonds for owner/occupied buildings; and That the City Council and Staff continue its action to complete Schooner Boulevard in its entirety because this is critical to future development in the Major Center Area. DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING STATUS — June, 1981 The report to the City Council dated 4-13-78 and entitled "Associated Land and Development Costs" has provided the basis for evaluating the effects of recent inflationary pressures on the development of land and the construction of housing in Eden Prairie. A close analysis of the current data indicates that the nation in general and Eden Prairie in particular are entering an extremely critical period of time when demand for housing is on the increase and the supply is be- coming less affordable. The increase in family income is not keeping pace with the increase in the cost of housing. In the past decade incomes have doubled and the cost of owning a home has quad- rupled. The cost of heating a home has likewise risen 400%. The median family income in Eden Prairie during 1980 aa $23,600. At today's rates this income would Allow a family to purchase a $62,000 home and carry a $49,000 mortgage, that is if the family had a $13,000 down payment. According to recent Multiple Listing Service data the present median sales price of a home in Eden Prairie is $103,000. Today a family buying this home, with a 20% down payment of $20,600 would need a $60,000 an.mal income. This means that the median priced home in Eden Prairie has risen at a compounded rate of 10% over the last 3 years compared with 14.6% for the general metropolitan area. Holding this present rate of increase constant the following will be the median cost of housing in Eden Prairie for the next 5 years. Year Average Cost 1982 $121,500 1983 143,500 1984 169,200 1985 199,700 1986 235,600 With interest rates presently averaging 16% and unlikely to be substantially reduced over an extended period of time, affordable housing, as we have known it, will be passing out of the American dream. If income requirements follow the expected path of housing costs a look at income requirements to purchase the median priced home in Eden Prairie would resemble the following figures (assuming 20% down payment). Year Average Cost $121,500 143,500 169,200 199,700 235,600 PITI Income 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 $1,391 1,741 2,005 2,372 2,750 $ 67,000 84,000 97,000 114,000 132,000 The average price of a lot in Eden Prairie in the past 3 years has risen from $16,000 to $26,000. There is presently market pressure to reduce inventory and as a result lot prices have stabilized. But at today's cost of financing improved lots, which varies between 20 and 25%, the price of homesites will likely follow or exceed the percentage increase in housing. If lot price increases average 18% per year the following will be expected lot prices in Eden Prairie for the next 5 years. 6 I c.3 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 Lot Price $30,680 36,200 42,750 50,400 59,480 Taxes on lot inventory improved in 1978 and unsold in 1981 have quadrupled from $200 to $800. At this rate taxes alone will add nexly $10,000 to the price of an unsold lot over a 5 year period of time. If the cost of taxes and money is not reduced we are more likely to see the average lot in Eden Prairie range between $70,000 and $80,000 by 1986. The most urgent message coming from the marketplace today is that people's expectations must be reduced to conform to present day realities. Size must be made smaller, extras eliminated, amenities reduced and diversity expanded. Estimates for the 1980's indicate that 80% of the dwelling units will be built for 1 and 2 person households. Already in 1977 family composition in this country showed that only 13;4, of households conformed to the traditional image of working husband, housewife mother and children under 18 years of age. Today Woof all households have no children under 18. Housing in the 80's will not receive the attention from the federal government that it enjoyed in the 70 1 5. As a result" capital markets, as presently structured, will not be able to accommodate the demand as household formations expand faster than the population. According to TIME magazine (Dec. 14, 1970 Edition): U.S. Govornmont figures hwilcate a current annual rata of inflation of 7.2%! I USIII4 AN ANTICIPATED FIGURE OF ONLY 6% AS THE ANNUAL RATE OF INFLATION THE FOLLOWING RGURES WERE COMPILED BY THE UNITED STATES SAVINGS AND LOAN LEAGUE (Ms ()facial National Association'td Savings and loan Institutions): tr=ls TO AUUMTAR4 in CL=1. STelArl) Of UM A 'ALM WHOSE ...gilt. IN 1075 IN 1550 IN 1925 IN MO IN 1905 IN WOO WWI WAS DIU LIVE TI EARN El DA TO ma BEI KM II IAD lal II2E TO WI Will KAYE TI EAU ni UTE T1 EMI $ 8,960 $13,382 $17,908 $23,965 $32,071 .$43,918 $57,435 BUT THAT'S NOT ALL LOOK AT SOME OF THE PROJECTED PRICES OF SEVERAL ESSENTIAL ITEMS ITEMS BASED ON THE SAME INFLATIONARY SCALEI tr.OVIE MEET t 1 • I 1975 19110 1005 1990 1905 2000 :. old is, , -1 , • .1: $ 4.00 $ 5.35 $ 7.16 $ 9.58 $ 12.82 $ 17.16 C=Cr.:ES 1 i 26.76 35.82 47.93 64.14 85.84 114.87 f.7.73 SUIT I 167.29 223.88 299.60 400.93 536.54 718.00 COIC2 T.V. 669.11 895.42 1,198.27 603.56 2,145.92 2,871.72 ktril=n1E 4,014.66 5,372.52 7,189.62 9,621.36 12,875.52 17,230.35 34,258.00 45,846.00 61,351.00 82,102.00 109,871.00 147,032.0 T:f1S 1:7114tiS T;!..1T 11 THE YEAR 2CC3 ACCORDING TO TNIS sAriE INFLATIONARY S2.7‘).LE TODAY'S DOLLAR Ma BE 11011114 WILY 151/20 20 150 170 PLANNING: PUD Zoning Plat, preliminary E.A.W. Deposit. Consultant fees $200 Lump Sum $200 ” $25441/lot or acre $200 Lump Sum $200 average $7,500 (50 lots) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT COSTS June '81 Rate Cost Per Lot($) COMMUNITY SERVICES: Cash Park Fee $325 single family 325 $250 multiple $1,400/acre other Totlot (if 50 units or more) Totlot structure Site work and plantings landscaping bond (2 yr.) Sidewalks & Trails $10,000 $10,000 $ 5,000 $18/$1,000-500,000 II 500 100 925 Esti. m4 Development Costs Page Two Rate Cost Per Lot ($) ENGINEERING: Final plat review (min. $100) Street signs Lighting Bonding $30/lot, or $20/acre $120/sign $322/light 30 20 40 120 210 BUILDING INSPECTION: Permit fee $50,000-100,000 $100,001 $283 first 50,000 + $3/$1,000 after $433 first 100,000+ $2.50/$1,000 after 440 Sewer hookup residential industrial commercial $200 .03061/sq. ft. ($400 minimum) .04591/sq. ft. ( 200 Water hookup residential $200 200 industrial .03061/sq. ft. ($400 minimum) commercial .04591/sq. ft. ( S.A.C. charge single family or multiple other-determined by MWCC $425 $425 minimum 425 Plan Check 50% of permit fee 220 65% of permit fee State Surcharge .50/$1,000 50 1,535 Esti 'ad Development Costs Pagr Three Rate Cost Per Lot ($) GRADING, UTILITIES & STREETS: $8,000-16,000 depending on topography, 12,000 soil conditions & lot size PROPERTY TAXES: $720/lot/yr (assuming 2 yrs. holding) 1,440 LAND COST: $6,000/acre 4,000 OTHER COSTS: Sales Commissions 1,750 Interest Charges ($20,000 @16% 3,200 for 2 years) Final Plat & Recording Fees 200 Profit 500 5,650 TOTAL 25,930 Planning Commission Minutes J07271-1381 MEMBERS ABSENT: Liz Retterath, Robert Hallett A. S•EIM'S CRUKSIDE ADDITION, by Frank J. Smetana Jr. Request to preliminary *plat 3:6 acres from approximately 16 acres zoned Rural. Located west of 1722 Smetana Lane. A public hearing. BearmiA asked if the variance regarding lot size have been granted from the Board of Aupeals. The Planner replied ves and further explained that this division is for nrone r t y tax purposes. He also reviewed the staff report dated 7/23/81 and introduced Mr. Frank SE2tana Jr. Srietana reviewed the location of the plat and surrounding land uses. MOTION .1 -Gartner i4wed to close the public hearing on Smetana's Creekside Addition. Sutliff seconded, motion carried 4-0. MOTION 2 Gariner moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat dated June 1, 1981 as per the July 23, 1981 staff report. Torjesen seconded, motion carried 4-0. STAN, REPORT TO FROM: THROUGH: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: - OWNER: REQUEST: Planning Commission Joan Johnson, Assistant Planner Chris Diger, Director of Planning July 23, 1981 SMETANA'S CREEKSIDE ADDITION Frank J. Smetana Helen B. Smetana Preliminary plat approval to divide 3.6 acres from 16 acres BACKGROUND About 2 years ago, Helen Smetana sold 12.4 acres, (north of Smetana Road), to Mr. Cherne. This 12.4 acre piece was part of a 16 acre parcel owned by Mrs. Smetana of which the remaining 3.6 acres is situated south of Smetana Road. Both of these properties are zoned Rural (see attached location map). The applicant, Frank Smetana Jr., (on behalf of his mother), filed for an administrative division but was unable to secure signatures of all adjoin- ing property owners. Therefore, the remaining process to request approval of a division is via the platting process in conjunction with a request before the Board of Appeals to grant a division in a Rural District less than 5 acres in size. The Board of Appeals granted the variance on June 18, 1981. (approval conditions attached) Division of the 3.6 acres south of Smetana Lane from the total 16 acre parcel will allow the 2 owners, (Mr. Cherne & Smetana), to receive separate tax statements without approving zoning or building upon either piece. Under these circumstances, the Planning Staff beleives the division is a reasonable request. The 3.6 acre piece is majoritably floodplain except a band 50-150' across the northern edge. After some filling, (as approved by Watershed), this piece by itself or combined with an adjacent piece would be buildable. Dedication oi the floodplain will be reviewed with the future development request. RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning -Staff would recommend approval of the preliminary plat contin- gent upon the following: 1. Owner shall not construct upon the property until such time as zoning is approved, utilities are available, and a hard surface street to City standards is in place. 2. Any future grading or filling must conform to City and Watershed District rules and regulations. JJ:ss CA CI 0 U13 CI r3 C3 M El LI CI Ea 1 2 . 4 ACRES Ownership: Cherne (future office/industrial) "C. Flood plain elevation Resi- :encel rt • 3 6 ACRES Own ership:Sinet ana:.;.: (future Resident) f„ SMETANA LAKE Ck6n Vida TOTAL lt ACRE PIECE I.PROPOSED SMETANA'S CREEKSIDE ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE (5) Variance fl 81-13 ZONIEC BOARD OP APPEALS AND ADJUSTEENTS VIDAL ORDER RE: Petition of Frank & Marion Smetana Location 7722 Smetana Lane The Board of Appeals and Adjustm e n t s f o r t h e C i t y or Eden Prairie at a regular (special) meeting thereo f d u l y c o n s i d e r e d t h e a b o v e p e t i t i o n a n d after hearing and exaRinin g all of the evidence presented a n d t h e f i l e therein does hereby find and or d e r a s f o l l o w s : 1. All procedural requirements nec e s s i v y f o r t h e g r a n t i n g o f said variance have been met. (YES A NO ) 2. There are circumstances unique t o t h e p r o p e r t y u n d e r c o n s i d e - ration, and granting such varia n c e d o e s n o t v i o l a t e t h e s p i r i t and intent of the City's Zoning a n d p l a t t i n g O r d i n a n c e s . (YES A NO 3. Variance Request V el-1) is herein ,ranted X ,Denied 4. Conditions to the granting 'Denial of said variance are as follows: NT CU 't( Yr Xoj 0 K4,40i Ckt (c. ..<21. 1\t 2 _6; 4,4 loc.. c‘,,,,lyeL -14 u4A: 'W4 \V,A A%*\Ltc 51kct . /-- I s. This variance shall be revoked w i t h i n 1 5 d a y s a f t e r n o t i c e of failure to meet the required co n d i t i o n s h a s b e e n g i v e n . G. A copy of this order shall be forwarded to the applicant by the City Clerk. 7. This order shall be effectiv e _ ) I ______Jhowever, this variance shall lapse and be of n o f t e - t n n l e s s t h e e r e c t i o n o r alterations permitted shall occu r w i t h i n o n e (1) year of the effective date unless said perio d o f t i m e i s e x t e n d e d p u rsuant to the apprcprtate procedures prior CO the expiration of one year from the effective date her e o f . BOARD OP Am ES AND ADJUSTMENTS BC ATED: Y: J6,e, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE . HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RI SOI 111 ION NO. .81-144 III Sal U •NP n i'.(A/ I NG 1111: PI.AT OF S.FILTANA' S CRECKSIDE ADDITIONL IIE 11 NISOEVED by the leen Prairie City Council as follcv..s: That the pr el imi nary plat of _ __Smetana s_Creeks ide Addition d u t.„d June ,1,_1981_ a copy of which is on file at the City Hall and ani(md0 as follows: _ feund to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie 7un119 and Platting ordinances and amendments thereto and is herein appi eyed. AHMED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of 19, Wolfgang H. -P.e-n-7. el , Mayor ...."John U, Irene ," City- Clerk SEAL Planning Commission Minutes -2- Jiirrrrrr 78 1 MEMBERS ABSENT: Liz Retterath, Robert Hallett B. CftlEK RIpGE_TSTATIS, by Brian Gensmer. Request to preliminary plat 31 acres zonA Rural into 5 lots for single family cues. located in the northwest quadrant of Co. Rd. 18 end Riverview Road. A public hearing. The Planner introduced Mr. Gene Ernst, of Ernst Associates and Mr. Brian Ge n s m e r . Ernst gave a slide presentation and stated that the re-subdivision plans ar e s h o w n for possible future uses. He went on to review the access, topography o f t h e s i t e , vegetation, and elevations. The Planner reviewed the staff report dated 7/23/81. Sutliff asked if the location of the roadways fall within ordinance require m e n t s . The Planner replied yes. Torjesen then stated that he was concerned with the amount of traffic. The P l a n n e r replied that the two (2) accesses will be consolidated to 1 which would be better and further stated that Hennepin County had approved this. Torjesen stated that he liked the future plans of the re-subdivision. Th e P l a i n e r stated that the southern area could develop into smaller lots for example , a n d there would be no major problems; but when on to say that the northern ar e a w o u l d have a great impact on the slopes. Sutliff asked if the road will be a private read. The Planner replied that it would be a public road. Gearman asked if the greemoy easement is a normal requirement. The Planner stated that this would be done because it is a unique part of the creek. Reunion also asked the length of the cul-de-sac. Censwr replied 8fC to 8 3 0 . MOTION 1 Torjeson moved to close the public hearing on Creek Ridge Estates. S u t l i f f seconded, motion carried 4-0. MOTION .2 forj(.son ilved to reco'.cmd to the City Council approval of the 5 acre pla t a s per the report dated 1/23/81, and the Hennepin Ceuhty Poartmont of Trans p o r t a t i o n letter dated 7/14/81 stating that the re-subdivision plan was submitted f o r i n f o r - mation only and amending item 8 of the staff report to read as follows: A n y future subdivision of the property must be submitted for review and approval ard s h a l l be in accordance with City Ordinance requirements at such time. Gartner seLo n d e d . DISCOSSTON Sutliff asked if the proponent will have to return for rezoning and/or fu t u r e platting. The Planner replied yes. Motion carried 4-0. 0'7 TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources CommisSion FROM: Rob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: July 30, 1981 SIMJECT: Development Propo.A1 Check List PROJECT: Creek Ridge Estates PROPONENT: Brian Gensmer pLem$T. Preliminary plat approval of 5 + acre lots zoned Rural. tomilm Southeast corner of Eden Prairie, north of Riverview Rd.,west of Co. R d . 1 8 . itnacnotim See Planning Staff Report Dated: PARK AND RECREATION PLANNING CONCERNS 1. Type of development:_ilesidantial 2. Number of units in residential development: 5 (4 new units) 3. Number of acres in the project: 31 acres 4. Special recreation spacC requirem Noneents: S. Adjacent to any existing or proposed parks: No a. Affect on the park: N/A 6. Need for a mini park: No 7. Cash park fee or land dedication? Cash park fee a. If Cash park fee dedication, amount based on existing ordinance w i l l t o t a l : $1,300 b. If park land dedication, the number of acres to be dedicated is NIA c. Existing Or pending assessments or taxes on proposed park property total N/A and will be paid prior to dedication. 8. Adjacent to existing or proposed trails: Transportation trail proposed along the north side of Riverview Road. a. Type of trails Trancportatinn b. Construction Material Asphalt c. Width of trail 8 feet d. Party responsible for construction -City . e. Landownership of trail location:(dedicated, purchased, R011)_ROW NAlliRAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION CONCERNS I. Site grading plan considers natural amenities of the site? The 5 acre_plan does a fair job. however, Community_5ervices Staff has a concern on the grading that will take place when the land is further subdivided: Occurs along the northern cul-de-sac road.' 2. 140A signiticant grading on the site: iva 3. SiViri ,'"a vcg"a " on II'. 'ile i ncl "d "L'he_Laird_SitilAS.IPaVilymouleid with mature aged elm, oak, basswood and boxelder. 4. The site grading plan indicates preservation of: The majority of the site will be preserved with this proposed grading plan. s. Koma to public waters: Purgatory Creek a. Affect on waters: See Planning Staff Report REFERENCE CHECK 1. Major Center Area Study jfl 2. Neighborhood Facilities Staly JI 3. Purgatory Creel. Study : ske_nannin,g_stiff_Riamt„ 4. Shoreland Management Ordinance :See Planning Staff Report S. Floodplain Ordinance : See Mannino Staff Report 6.. Guido 'tan Guide Plan depicts this area as low density residential 7. Other : RECOMINDATIONS 1. Adjacent neighborhood type, and any neighboihood opinion voiced in favor or opposed to the project: 2. Planning Commission Recommendationi___Ilip Planninp Commission moved te_reLDMmend ta_the City Council approval of the 5 acre_plat as per the Planning Staff Reilett July 23, 1981 .amending item 11 8 of tile 'Staff Rennrt_As followli_aUJItt=_50- division of the property must be a grAng ;I-l it h rvaet i ud o mprI gn milm INWR in at that time. 3. Community Services Staff: Community Services staff recommends the Commission approve the proppsal as per_the Planning gaff Repor_t_and tke amendment. STAFF REPORT TO: FRO:4: THROUGH: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: REQUEST: Planning Commission Jean Johnson, Assistant Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning July 23, 1981 CREEK RIDGE ESTATES Brian Gensmer Preliminary plat approval of 5+ acre lots upon 31 acres zoned Rural. BACKGROUND The Guide Plan depicts the property as low density residential. In 1977, the Park, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission studied the possibility of acquiring this property, then owned by Bublitz. The decision to enter into an option to acquire the property for parkland was not approved by the City Council. Last year the City of Bloomington installed a storm sewer line under Co. Rd. 18 and along the property's south bounda ...y to Purgatory Creek. EXISTING SITE CHARACTER Soils The 2 main classes of soils are Dickman SandyLoaniand Hubbard Loamy Sand. Both of these soils are suitable for building with the main limitation being a high drought hazard. Sloyes Slopes vary from 6-20%. The existing house is situated adjacent to a 20+% slope. Future homes on the 5 acre sites could also be close to 20% slopes and erosion control barriers as required by City will have to be installed if the City believes erosion is possible or as required by Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District. Vegetation The site is heavily wooded with mature and aged elm, oak, basswood and box- elder. Diseased elm trees in this area of the City are outside the Control Zone and removal is not required. ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS lhie4 new buildable lots are in excess of 5 acres in size, the lot upon which the existing home is located is 5.2 acres in size, and the outlet which is proposed to be dedicated to the City is 4.87 acres. Four of the five lots have lot lines drawn into the 100 year floodplain area. These lines should be brought out of the floodplain and this can be done without going under the 5 acre minimum. The lots conform to minimum lot width and depth, and place- ment of hones according to the Rural District setbacks should be no problem. (50 front, 50:150 sides, 50' rear) I:, 0 Staff Report-Creek Ridge Estates page 2 Purlatory_Creek_Study The depiction of the 4.87 outlot to be dedicated and the 100 foot wide green- way easement are consistent with the Creek Study. At time of final plat prepaeation, and prior to any building permits, the owner should submit to the City for review and acceptance a scenic easement document prohibiting construction upon, cutting of vegetation, etc., as required by City. SITE PLAN Roth street access points and sight lines have been reviewed by Hennepin County. The northern most street and cul-de-sac will be cut through the property's slopes and woods but the tree removal will not be a significant amount of the total trees on the site. The street is not shown as having a potential to go north to serve other properties and connect tu Bluff Road because of the steep grade. Therefore, a cul-de-sac in excess of 500' will serve the property. The plat depicts the northern street as 50' right-of-way and a 28' surface. The Engineering and Planning Staff believes a 25' surface would be sufficient to serve the density proposed and would reduce the overall grading and tree removal. The southern access point as depicted on the preliminary plat is an area 50' x 50' proposed to be dedicated to the City, and will be the location of a future public street if and when further subdivision is approved. The City does not desire ownership and maintenance of such a small right-of-way and therefore suggests the 50' x 50' area be designated as an outlot upon the plat. This outlet will be owned and maintained by the owners of lots 1 and 2, block 2, and will be the location of the future road to serve future subdivided lots. Upon approval of the plat and prior to a building permit for lot 1, block 2, improvements to the new entry-way must be made and the old drive locations must be discontinued. Future development of this area will increase the number of residences and thereby increase daily trips upon the 25' street. If 1 acre+ lots are developed with City sewer and water, the increase will not over burden the street, but restrictions, i.e., no parking may be implemented. If a greater density is over proposed, complete re-evaluation of the street width and improvements would have to be made. Drainage In block 1, lot 3, water will drain towards the center of the street and be carried via a storm water pipe to a discharge point 25' from a natural drainage swab e to Purgatory Creek. Lots 1 and 2, block 1 and block 2, will drain over land down to the creek. Co. Rd. 18 Hennepin County Highway Department is requesting an additional 17 feet of right-of-way. This will be consistent with the 50' right-of-way from centerline along Co. Rd. 18 in other projects and does not alter the City's designation of Co. Rd. 18 as a minor arterial. Shorel and Ordinance The plat meets the minimum lot size of 5 acres for lots without sewer and water adjacent to General Development Waters. Cash Park ror Since there are a limited number of new lots(4)on large 5+acre lots and the 4.87 acre outlot is proposed for dedication as per the Purgatory Creek Study, the staff is suggesting the Cash Park Fee be waived. VI Staff Report-Creek Ridge Estates page 3 RECOMMENDATIONS The -ffarially Staff would recommend approval of the preliminary plat contingent upon the following: 1. That a land alteration and erosion control plan be approved by the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District. 2. Lot lines be brought out of the floodplain while maintaining the 5 acre minimum size. 3. That at time of final plat the owner convey the floodplain outlot to the City. 4. That a scenic easement document be submitted to the City Attorney for review and approval. 5. That the 28' road surface be reduced to 25' as per the conditions as outlined in this report. 6. That the 50' x 50' right-of-way be designated as an outlot upon the final plat with ownership and maintenance by access benefitting properties. 7. Hennepin County Highway Department recanmendations and requirements be followed. 8. Any future subdivision of the property must be submitted for review and approval, and cannot occur prior to availability of municipal sewer and water. 9. Owner must notify City and Watershed 48 hours prior to any grading upon the property. JJ:ss HENNEPIN COUNTY 1(0c3 On equol opportunity employer DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av. South HENNEPIN Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 935-3381 July* 14, 1981 Mr. Chris Enger Director of Planning City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Mr. Eager: RE Proposed Plat - "Creek Ridge Estates" CSAII 18 NW Quadrant of River View Road Section 36, Township 116, Range 22 Hennepin County Plat No. 939 Review and Recommendations Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and found it acceptable with consideration of these conditions: -To allow enough right of way for future reconstruction of CSAH 18, the developer should dedicate an additional 17 ft. of right of way making the right of way 50 ft. from the center of CSNI 18. -The proposed location of the 2 access points is acceptable to Hennepin County. After constructing the proposed southerly access, the existing driveways must be removed. -Any new access to a county road requires an approved Hennepin County entrance permit. See our Traffic Division for entrance permit forms. -All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. See our Maintenance Division for utility permit forms. -The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within County right of way. Please direct any response or questions to Les Weigelt. Sincerely, James M. Wold, P.E. Chief, Planning and Programing JMW/1.1M:pj cc: Ernst Associates 16 June 1981 Planning Director City of Eden Prairie . 8950 Eden Prairie Rd. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Ref: CREEK RIDGE ESTATES PRELIMINARY'PLAT SUPPORTIVE MATERIAL 1. OWNER/DEVELOPER INVOLVED .Brian and Georgianne Gensmer Office Address: 10740 Lyndale Ave: So. Minneapolis, MN 55420 Phone: 612/884-8781 Have been involved in single family and double bungalow construction in Edina. Presently involved in 25 lot single family development in Savage, MN. 2. PROPOSED USE AND SALE OF LOTS 5 Acre Single Family Lots. I hope to sell Block 2 in 5 acre parcels and sell Block 1 in 5 acre parcels, but keeping one lot in Block 1 for myself. One lot in Block 2 is already sold contingent upon getting plat approval. Lots will be marketed by Aspen Realty who are very familiar with Eden Prairie developments. . EXISTING ZONING Rural 4. COUNTY HALF SECTION DEPICTING SURROUNDING LAND USE AND PROPERTY OWNERS The existing land use and property owners are indicated on the 1"= 50' scale preliminary plat. The primary uses are large single family, rural and hobby farm uses. Planning Director 16 June 1981 Page 2 5. COVENANTS IF DESIRED None presently, but possibly having covenants relating to: 1. Architectural style 2. Square footages 3. Value 6. SOIL BORINGS IF REQUESTED To date no soil borings have been requested. • 7: CROSS SECTIONS Of PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, CENTER LIME GRADIANTS OF PROPOSED STREETS The proposed street gradients are shown on the preliminary plat. If there are any other questions or clarifications required in reference to the preliminary plat please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, ii°/17 Mr. Brian Gensmer DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washingion Av. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 935-3381 June 5, 1981 HEN NEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer Mr. Chris Inger City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie RD Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Creek Ridge Estates Preliminary Plat Access Chris: The proposed northerly access is acceptable as drawn. Although the sight distance to the right (south) is 150' below recommendation, the presence of the curve and hill to the south restricts the vehicle speeds to well below the 50 MPH speed limit thereby allowing adequate visibility. The proposed southern access, however, should be located 20' to 25' further south to enhance the sight distances in both directions. Locating this access exactly 100' south of the existing private driveway gains 5'-10' in sight distance to the north and 30-40' south over the proposed location. Finally, these accesses should be designed to city street standards at least within Hennepin County right-of-way. If there are further questions, please call. Sincerely, David K. Zetterstrom Entrance Permit Coordinator Traffic Engineering DKZ:de cc: Mr. Gene Ernst, Ernst and Associates IVA CITY OF iDEN PRAIRIE HLNNEPIN COUNIY, RES01.11110ii NO. 81-145 NTS01.11110:1 APPROVING 1111: 1 ,111:1.1V,INARY PLAT OF CREEK RIDGE ESTATES kif,OLVLD by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: not the p: el ind nary plat of Creek Ridge Estates (ttnd June 16, 1981 , a copy of \Mich is on file at the City ltall _— and i:Ificmdec1 05 follov..s: • ,--• .••• -•••••---- 15 1-(Ililid to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie 7Oning and Platting ordinances and amendments thereto and is herein approved. AUOP11:10 by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of 19. ......... ...... _ John U. Er.me, City Clerk SEAL — July 15, 1981 IX i 11 101 Mr. Carl Jullie (;) Eden Prairie City Manager kj 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Jullie: The Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council (HCCJCC) repre- sentatives have recently addressed the issue of the future role of the Council. This examination was prompted by the current phasing down of the LEAA grant-in-aid program which originally led to the establishment of the Council and has, to a significant degree during the past nine years, dictated the nature of Council business. Commencing in 1972, Hennepin County, the City of Minneapolis and all suburban units of government within the County informally became members of the Council. Federal planning funds were made available for this pur- pose by the Governor's Crime Commission and, with Hennepin County desig- nated as the sponsoring unit of government for these planning funds, the Council was established and assumed many of the program planning and technical assistance functions previously performed by the state. The original representation on the Council was made up of nineteen individuals from Hennepin County, the City of Minneapolis and suburban municipalities. With a primary emphasis on the implementation of the LEAA program, the Council continued in existence as a quasi-governmental agency until 1977. In the last quarter of 1976 and the first quarter of 1977 several major changes were made in the conduct of the LEAA program in Hennepin County and the Council was reorganized both in terms of its function and its relationship to units of government in the County. At that time, your jurisdiction and 28 other political jurisdictions within Hennepin County executed a joint resolution establishing your membership in the Council and concurrently approving the Coordinating Council's Operational Bylaws. These actions reorganized the Council as a forum through which local units of government in Hennepin County may, by association, consultation and study, cooperatively promote improvements in the criminal justice system welch transcend departments, agencies and the geographical bounda- ries of theindividual communities. In accord with this reorganization, the member units of government auth- orized the Council and its staff to assist local units of government and local law enforcement and criminal justice agencies to improve the justice system in our county, primarily through the provision of technical assis- tance, program planning and development and the coordination of inter- governmental/interagency justice system activities. Additionally, the ‘.tik A-2308 Government Center, 300 S. Sixth St., Minneapolis, MN 55487, 348-6497 Council and its staff were authorized to continue functioning as the Law Enforce- ment Assistance Administration planning agency for all units of government in Hennepin County. Since that reorganization in 1977, the LEAA grant-in-aid functions continued to represent a significant portion of the Coordinating Council's activities. However, consistent with the broader role and function as defined in the joint resolution and accompanying bylaws of the organization, Council and staff activi- ties were expanded to include program development and technical assistance activ- ities which were responsive to needs as perceived by local units of government within the County. The scheduled termination of the LEAA grant-in-aid program and the current phase down toward that end prompted the Coordinating Council to directly address the need for maintaining the HCCJCC in the abselice of the LEAA program. A Special Study Committee was impaneled by the Council in January of this year and, upon recommendation from that Study Committee, the membership of the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council voted in April to continue the organiza- tion as a viable mechanism for addressing criminal justice system issues and problems. In effect, the Council's vote was a reaffirmation of the duties and responsibilities as articulated in the current authorizing resolution and by- laws. This action will result in the Council's focus of attention being as follows: • Serve as an intergovernmental and interagency advisory group on policy oriented issues. • Serve as a forum for the interchange of ideas and information on current criminal justice issues and problems. • Serve in a mediation capacity by providing the opportunity for identifying and discussing differences. • Conduct system rate analyses to assess the effects of policy and legislative changes upon the entire criminal justice sys- tem or guage the impact of changes in one component of the system upon other components. The phasing down of the LEAA Program has also resulted in the loss of federal funding which was used to finance the Coordinating Council's staff and support- ive services. In response to this loss of funding, the Council will initially request staff assistance from Hennepin County and it will also proceed to ex- plore the establishment of an independent supoort've services capacity, e.g., corporate contributions and area foundations. In addition to the Coordinating Council's deliberations and discussions on its function and its decision to establish an independent supportive services capacity, the Council also considered the adequacy of current representation. In its discussion of this item, the Council concluded that current governmental representation adequately reflected a balance of interests. However, with respect to private sector representation, the Council is recommending a change. The Operational Bylaws currentlyprovidefourpositions for private sector representa- tion and, in order to enhance the Council's ability to more accurately reflect community interests and nerds, the Council is recommending an increase to six positions. In accord with the provision of Article X of the Operational Bylaws, this proposed amendment must be approved by a two-thirds majority of the Council's membership before it can be in force and effect. Therefore, the proposed amend- ment as approved by the Coordinating Council is being forwarded to the attention of the Council's 29 member units of government for consideration. To assist in this process, we have enclosed for your convenience: a copy of the proposed amendment, a listing of the current membership and representation and a copy of your resolution and the Operational Bylaws whicn authorized the establishment of the Council and your participation as a member. Each member unit of govern- ment in Hennepin County is requested to: 1. Submit the proposed amendment to their governing boards for consideration and action; and 2. File a certified copy of their governing boards' action regard- ing this proposed amendment with the Criminal Justice Coordinat- ing Council's administrative office on or before August 15, 1981. As your designated representatives on the HCCJCC we urge the continued support and active participation of the Council's member units of government. We are confident that this focus of attention is consistent with the terms of the Council's authorization in 1977 and with the mutual interests of the organiza- tion's members. We are equally confident that the proposed amendment to the Operational Bylaws is appropriate at this time and that its adoption will en- hance the Coordinating Council's ability to more accurately reflect community interests and needs. We do therefore wish to advise you as a member unit of government of these changes and to request your favorable consideration of the proposed amendment by August 15, 1931. Inquiries regarding clarifications or additional information on these changes may be directed to staff at 348-3069. Sincerely, • 1 -. , • et: C. Wayne Courtney, Co-Chairmall Edina Councilman Thomas L. Johnson, Co-Chairman Hennepin County Attorney eb Enclosures: Membership List List of Representatives Authorizing Resolution/Bylaws Proposed Amendment and Sample Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 81-147 RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO HENNEPIN COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL BYLAWS WHEREAS, the City of recognizes the need for criminal justice planning and coordination on a countywide basis; and, WHEREAS, the City of therefore participated by formal resolution authorizing its membership in the Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council; and, WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council has pro- posed an amendment to the Coordinating Council's Operational Bylaws wherein representation from private sector agencies would be increased from four to six positions so as to enhance the Council's ability to more accurately reflect community interests and needs; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of does approve this amendment to the Operational Bylaws of the Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council. Passed by the City Council of the City of . this day of , 1981. MEMORANDUM TO: THRU: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Carl Jullie, City Manager Bob Lambert, Director of Community Service(0'' July 31, 1981 Request to Obtain Quotes for an Architect to Design the Staring Lake Park Shelter & Neighborhood Park Shelters The City has recently completed grading neighorhood parks in Hidden Ponds, Lake Eden and Creekwood and is presently advertising for the neighborhood park at Red Rock. The City will be constructing neighborhood parks at Homeward Hills, Franlo Road and Duck Lake within the next two to five years. All of these neighborhood parks will have skating areas, most will have hockey rinks and all will eventually have summer recreation programs offered at those locations. These programs require a park shelter that should include rest rooms and storage area and an open sitting area of approximately 20x40'. These buildings should be as vandal proof as possible, probably block construction with steel doors and frames, yet should be estheticly pleasing in a park setting. The four neighborhood parks that presently have park shelters were all constructed with limited funds) and a warminn house use as the main criteria. None of the neighborhood park shelters have restrooms, nor is there any space planned for stubbing in facilities when water and sewer is available. City staff would recommend hiring an architect to design a standard neigborhood park shelter that could be used in all of our neigbhorhood parks. Staff would estimate the cost of the construction of a typical shelter to be approximately $40-$50,000 with architectural design fees for the original drawings at approximately 6%, and with subsequent onsite inspection fees for each building constructed with this design at about 1.5% of the construction cost. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission considered this request at the July 20 meeting and were concerned with having a "standard neighborhod park shelter" for all neighborhood parks and suggested possibly a basic design that could have several models that would change the exterior look of each building either with a change in materials used, roof line, windows, whatever. Architectual fees for small projects such as a $40-$50,000 building often run 10-12%, therefore if one design would work in each park, the City would realize a considerable saving with the Onstruction of six or seven of these buildings. Staff would also reconnnend, at this time, to hire an architect to design the park shelter for Staring Lake Park. This shelter will have an open sided area for sunner picnic use as well as an enclosed area for winter warming house use. The design for this shelter should be completed this fall for construction in the spring of 1982. Estimated cost for this shelter is $50-$60,000. 160- MEMORANDUM TO: THRU: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Bob Lambert, Director of Community ServicerAt--- Stephen Calhoon, Park Planner July 19, 1981 Proposed Change at Creekwood Park Tennis Courts Staff suggests that the proposed two tennis courts at Creekwood Park be revised to one tennis court and one basketball/multi-use court. There are currently 8 existing tennis courts within 1.2 miles and only 1 basketball court in the same area (at Preserve Park). In the past few years participation in tennis by local residents has declined somewhat, while requests for basketball/multi-use courts has increased, particularly from the Creekwood area. Staff feels the addition of the basketball/multi-use court will better serve the residents providing .a greater variety of activities. Tennis West Ltd can make the change from a tennis court to a basketball/multi-use court for an additional $1,135.00. SC:md 1 663 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Service -ria-- DATE: July 31, 1981 SUBJECT: Community Center Change Order Request CONCESSION STAND Change Order A-7 is for a total cost of $1,532, of which Smiley Glotter Associates will credit the City $473 for a total cost of $1,059. A copy of that change order is attached. Change Order M-2 is for a total os $2,957 with a credit of $333, making the actual cost to the City $2,624. The majority of this cost goes toward a three compartment stainless steel sink. Approximately $900 of that cost is for labor required to tear out a wall and change piping that has already been installed. Change Order E-4 is for a total of $628 for increased service to the concession stand required by the Community Center Manager. Total cost to the City for changes required in the concession stand, to make this a full service concession stand, is $4,311. Items 9 thru 13 of Change Order E-4 are items that were previously approved by the City Council. FIRE PROTECTION PACKAGE During the design phase of the Community Center, the architect attempted to get an interpretation of the building code from the City Building Inspe c t o r in regards to sprinkling this facility. After nine documented phone calls and several letters, Smiley Glotter Associates submitted their proposal for fire accesses, etc. to the City Building Inspector and indicated that i f he wished a change to notify them immediately. They never received any wo r d and proceeded with their interpretation of what was required. This took p l a c e in 1979. In 1981, the City hired a new Building Inspector and a Fire Marsh a l l . These gentlemen have reviewed the plan and have required the following: 1. An additional 48" door for emergency exit is required in the swimming pool area. a l -2- 2. A 6" water line is required be extended into the building with a 4" water line running to four standpipes. 3. If any dry floor events are run in the ice arena area, that area must be sprinkled. The City has received an estimated cost of approximately $14,000 for the water line and standpipe addition. On Tuesday evening, August 4, staff will have the exact amount and request the Council approve this amount because the water line over the future bleacher area must be installed this week as the dropped ceiling will begin to go in at the later part of the week. On Tuesday evening, we will also have a cost on the 48" door ih the pool area. BL:md 0 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 8002 CONTRACT FOR: General Construction CHANGE ORDER AM DOCUMENT G701 OWNER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR FIELD OTHER E SMILEY GLOTTER ASSOCIATES ARCHiT E CIS ENGINEERS PLANNERS C) 5121 LASALI E AVE NUE 61? 332 1401 MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA S5403 PROJECT: Eden Prairie Community centeiCHANGE ORDER NUMBER: A-7 Oame,acklres0 16700 Valley View Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota DATE: July 27, 1981 TO (Contractor) -1 Ma g ney Construction Company 2724 Fernbrook Lane Minneapolis, MN 55441 CONTRACT DATE: October 1, 1980 You we directed to make the Wowin g chan g es in this Contract: Revise Concession Room 131 to meet current Hennepin County Health Department Standards as per SGA drawing R-8 dated May 28, 1981, and Proposal Re q uest A-9 dated May 29, 1981. All at costsper Magney q uotation dated June 23, 1981 and SGA letter of July 16, 1981 as approved by Eden Prairie City Council on July 21, 1981. 1. Ceramic tile floor & base - $1,559.00 2. Vinyl faced ceiling tile - $ 75.00 3. Epoxy paint on sink wall - $ 98.00 4. Revise & reduce casework ($ 200.00) credit TOTAL ADD $1,532.00 The original Contract Sum was $1,653,000.00 Net change by previous Change Orders $ 42,482.22 The Contrail Skim prior to this Change Order was $1,695,482.22 The Contract Sum will he (increased) (r)(1/914E/r/Vainye/rlyby this Change Order. 1,532.00 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be $1,697,142.22 The Contract Time will be (;(1.4.6/,./k(cr54/stic11 (unchanged) by ) Days. The Date of Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is MACINTEY CONSTRUCTICN COMPANY CITY OF EMT] PRAIRIE . (9WJ4t r w RV1 -nbrookTane a Ecifli_Pririg_ Boad Address Address Minneapol i s , Minnesota 55491 Eden Prairie, Minnesota 5534? Ilia.".1.• B ( -?-C-1, 7 1 e^- 1 ---'1 , 0 - 3A1r II BY - i SMILEY C:IDTrER ASSCEJATES l itili.11 MSalle Avenue Aildiess nnealzil is, Minnesota 55403 DATE AIA DOCUMENT cool • I HANCE ORDER • APRIL 1970 tOITION • AIAS • (1) 1970 • TM I / / AMI RICAN: INST111.11E 01 ARC:1111E0S, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 L.f.0 0 ONE PACE COMMERCIAL GENERAL CONTRA C TORS 2 7 24 FERNBROOK LANE • MINNEA P O L I S , M I N N E S O T A 5 5 4 4 i 11togiteli 1E1,11170 14 1 (612) 551.5545 CONSTRUCTION CO, June 23, 1981 Smiley Clotter 1021 LaSalle Ave. Mpls., MN. 55(403 Dear Pete; RE: EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTE R In receipt of your proposal reque s t A - 9 , r e g a r d i n g r e v i s i o n s t o c o n c e s s i o n room 131, below you will find the b r e a k d o w n o f t h e c o s t s . 1.) Ceramic tile w/base Credit for vinyl base Labor 257. taxes & insurance Sub-total $1346.00 -50.00 $1296.00 48.00 12.00 $1356.00 157. overhead & profit 203.00 Total $1559.00 2.) Vinyl faced 2'x4' ceiling tile 65.00 15% overhead & profit 10.00 Total $ 75.00 3 & 4.) Casework revisions credit 200.00 5.) Epoxy paint NE wall at Rm. 13 1 85.00 15% overhead & profit 13.00 Total $ 98.00 The above prices are firm for 30 days from date of this letter. Please inform us as quickly as possible r e g a r d i n g t h e a b o v e c h a n g e s a n d p r o p o s a l r e q u e s t A-8 changes. We are now ready to w o r k i n b o t h t h e s e a r e a s a n d a n y d e l a y i n accepting these changes will res u l t i n a d d i t i o n a l c o s t s . I f y o u h a v e a n y f u r t h e r questions regarding aoove, please c o n t a c t m e . Sincerely, David Brellenthin DR/r1 INDUSTRIAL Am FOUL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER --COANGE ORDER AlA DOCUMENT G701 Distribution to: OWNER 0 ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR 0 FIELD 0 OTHER 0 PROJECT: Eden Prairie Community Ctr. Kume,addres0 Eden Prairie, MN. TO (Contractor): E Weaver Electric Co. Inc. 17610 — 19th Ave. N. Plymouth, MN. 55447 CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: E-4 INITIATION DATE: July 29, 1981 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 8002 - CONTRACT FOR: .Electrical Work CONTRACT DATE: Oct. 1, 1980 You are directed in nuke the following changes in this Contract: See Attached Sheet NoKAdtmokii4mdhyhtahMethcoer.mdAnWed. Sig.'Jr,: Iti the commit. indicate. hi. otieement I n plewoh, 011 immmimlig ray .01,1 ,1,110m ml lime Contract Sum of Conuact Time. $ 210,494.00 The original (Contract Sum) iritolcarocactgvt.:4Knott6Ixtc was $ 3,598.00 Net (lunge by prmiously atitholiled Change Orders $ 214,092.00 The (Contract Sum) (1.LRAOLKNR.V.xot:oextrw.X prior to thisr Change Order was The (Contract Stunt (F:XXXXx&XtruictLeXtmt) will be (increawch 4:140X,X>IthLt145:410r.Vii $ 4,773.00 by thr, Change Order TIre (Centraci unri (Ekrxrximxtxtkloms.,stlioo including th 218,865.00is Change Order will be The Ciintract lime will Iii! (kixtxxseLoticxxx.xcit (unchanged) by I Days. lhe Date of Sub‘tantial CompleLon as of the date of this Change Order therefore is _Dolejs Associates ;.5(illb"Eileen Circle Burp5..yijle4 MN. 55337_ r _ 41,1, dera, DM (7/29/81 Weaver_Flectric____ CONI KA( 11)11 mow. Plymouth, MN. 55447 ItY DNU Autholited: City of Eden Prairie °w 11§50 Eden Prairie Rd. Address Eden Prairie, MN.5534 BY_ DA T E AIA 1105 (OMNI (.7111 • (11NNU 11:0114 • APRO Veti 11)1111 ,N • MA. • 11., 1978 1111 AM110( V. 1 \ 511 WU (if AK(11111( 1`. 1;15 NI11' 51111k AV1 N11' 1%1N111N1,11)N, tic 2:11106 •• G701 — 1978 { . 1. Add 2 - 20 amp, 1 pole circuits to coffee uins. Add $ 110.00 2. Add - 1 - 20 amp 1 pole circuit for hot dog Add $ 65.00 machine . • 3. Add 1 - 30 amp, 2 pole circuit for cotton Add $ 125.00 candy machine. 4. Add 1 - 20 amp 1 pole circuit for micro wave. Add $ 65.00 . 5. Add 1 - 20 amp, 1 pole circuit for Soft drink Add $ 65.00. machine. ( 6. Credit for 30 amp, 2 pcle circuit and wiring Credit $ 62.00 cmitted and duplex receptacles and wiring omitted. 7. Add 1 - 30 amp, 2 pole circuit for popcorn Add $ 125.00 machine. B. Add 1 30 amp, 240 V, 2 pole, 10 Circuit for Add $ 135.00 Dwyer type kitchen unit in Room 134. 9. Add - Furnish and install a Electric Time Co. Add $ 472.00 "Big H" Cat. No. 50924 - 24°0 clock in Room 125 below scoreboard - black matte, surface mount case. (Wire into 120 volt circuit.) 10. Add - Stub a 14" EMT conduit from Panel P-1 into Add $ 383.00 Room 125 at the ceiling - Stub out above Room 205 11. Add - Furnish and install a demand meter and soc-Add $1709.00 ket in the feeder serving the ice making machine. This will require a current transformer cabinet and current transformers for submetering. a.) Current transformers to be :three (3) square D Cat. No. 800S Cat. No. 270-801. b.) Meter & Meter Socket to be a General Elec- tric type DSM-54, Cat. No. 701x31G7 with M-30 repisters. 12. Add wiring for another overhead door in Rocm 121 -Add $ 296.00 The door in common wall between 125 & 121). Install and wire raise/lower switch. Adjacent thermostat ' in 121 - wire in same manner as other door in this room. 13. Add - Buzzer system for racquetball courts con- -Add $1285.00 sisting of a single buzzer in upper corridor adjacent to racquetball courts and a Simplex progamed timer to be located in Room 105. System shall be wired to provide automatic signals for control of racquetball activities. TOTAL - Add $4_073.00 /60 --MANGE ORDER AIA DOCUMENT G701 Distribution to: OWNER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR FIELD OTHER PROJECT: Eden Prairie Comm. Center (name ,adthe")Eden Prairie, MN. TO (Contractor): Rainbow Mechanical Inc. 7241 Co. Rd. #116 Hamel, MN. 55340 CHANCE ORDER NUMBER: M-2 INITIATION DATE: 29 July, 1981 ARCM EI.CPS PROJECT NO: 8002 ° CONTRACT FOR: Mechanical Work CONTRACT DATE: Oct. 1, 1980 You are directed :a make the following changes in this Contract: See Attached Sheet Not ...ko unlit hot'. 5,1 arid .So Ii,,i. Si,'aI iii ii il,t 1/n11.11 111i itallt aqii,riwor hoinIg th... Contract Sur, or Conn.Ict The original (Cunha, I Sun)) 1(.X.7IXXXXI5\XXXXXNXXli was $ 531,350.00 Nei Orange Ity proyirmish a rithowed Change Order> $ 14,980.00 lit (Contract Sum) (oz...X..SXKKS".4)"...TSAUF.F.C.C,Kt) prior to Change Order was $ 546,330.00 Sul") lS.:XMCRV*361)Ci.:511E{C}t)t ) w i ll 1 'v lint reined) 517:‘,MOVAX(I1IRkkIndi by this Charve Order $ 2,957.00 The niAl. (Contra(I hurt X:X.,1011X:d>ts):X.NWrot5ox) nit toiling this Change Order w II be $ 549,287.00 The Contract TIMU will 110 OXIRIXinikxlicxox,i,zsstk (um banged) b y I 1 Days. The Dire of Stib.lanrial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is Dolejs Associates -"q l Eil eon Circle ville, MN. o l ege •- Rainbow Mechanical u(Thl"eo. Rd. 1(116 'ATiii;;;; - _FIN • 55340 Authoriied: City of Eden Prairie 1M6 Eden Prairie Rd. Addros Eden Prairie MN. 55343 BY EN 1 1 DATE NA UMINI (.70 • I IIANIA I /KW I: • A11:11 1111i n N • AIA. • tn 1`1711 11If WM. iNS1111 ,111/1 .0:C1111111S, l':..1•155.1()Kk 151 55111N(.10N, I) C 200), G701 — 1978 DOLEJS ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SIS N. (ROW ST. mANKA10, MINN. LAN I SOT US 2449 IlL(r0 CIRCLE OURNSVILLE, MINN. 54237 1.412 415.474Q 1). Furnish and ,install one (1) floor drain as shown ADD$ 199.00 on Revision Sheet M-1 - Floor Drains per original specs. 2). Furnish and install a 3 compartMent sink as shown on Revision Sheet M-1 - Elkay RNSF-8358 LB or equal Rigidbilt - #16 gauge nickle bearing stain- less steel Type 304 - seamless drawn with 1 3/4". radius coved corners. Underside undercoated. Faucet: Lk-67-C chrome plated 13" D.J. swing spout. 1/2" female flange.. Waste: LK-24-R tail. piece. 11/2" O.D. with S.S. strainer. Brass body. Rot° handle. Advance sink and faucet considered equal. 3). Handsink - American Standard #03L1.055 vitreous china lay with back. 2 soap depressions. Concealed hanger and drilled for thur going bolts. Size: 20" x 18" ADDS 830 '00 Trim 12103.604 Heritage aquaseal. With aerator. Brass lever handles, flow restrictor, pop up drain, tail piece and 4" centers. ADD$1996.00 4). Delete F-1 doubly compartment sink in 131. 5). Add waste and vent piping and hot and cold water piping for all items above - include these costs with each item shown above. 6). Add rough-in for a future Dwyer! Type Kitchen Unit in the South corner of meeting room 134 opposite concession room hand, sink. This will include hot and cold water and waste. 7) Install 11/2" cold water drop alonq'west wall of • zamboni room w!,th ball valves located 48" off of floor.' Pipe shall continue down and terminate in a horizontal direction A" above finished floor elevation with fire hose nipple. 8) Install sill cock 48" above, floor on cold water line listed in item 17. CREDIT$ 241.00 Add .$ 40.60 Add $ 71.00 Add $ 62.00 TOTAL - Add $1q7.00 61 I MEMO • TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager RE: Martin Drive Drainage Project, I.C. 52-007 DATE: July 29, 1981 At the July 21, 1981, Council meeting, the Engineering Division was directed to prepare a preliminary feasibility report for the improvement of the drainage- way north of Martin Drive. We have reviewed the area and find that the following facts will influence the project: 1. The entire drainage area consists of 205 acres; 2. Thirty five acres of the Eaton Char-Lyn property is controlled by a storm water dentention pond, therefore, the assessable drainage area contains 170 acres; 3. Our preliminary computations indicate that a ten year storm under existing conditions would develop 177 CFS; 4. Ten year storm under built up conditions would be approximately 200 CFS; 5. The pipe coming from Martin Drive is a 54" diameter RCP; 6. The pipe under the railroad track is a 72" CMP; 7. Although it would require a surcharged condition, a 54" RCP would appear to be adequate for a ten year storm both for existing and future developed conditions; 8. The estimated construction cost for the project would be $35,000. The assessment costs which would include engineering, administrative fees and capitalized interest have been running at approximately 30%. The resulting assessable cost would be approximately $45,500.00; and based on 170 acres at a total cost of $45,500.00, the assessment per acre would be approximately $268.00. The property contained in the drainage area ranges from being residential to industrial and in various stages of development. As an additional fact, the petition that has been submitted for this improvement project comes from one owner having about two acres of land within the drainage area. In other words, we have a petition from one percent of the property owners in the drainage area which would result in a $536.00 assessment if spread in a uniform manner across the entire drainage area. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK's LICENSE APPLICATION LIST August 4, 1981 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMMERICAL) August Cederstrand Co. Galaxy Builder, Inc. Paul S. Gray Co., Inc. Terrific Lunch Co. CONTRACTORS (1 & 2 FAMILY) Custom Pools, Inc. A. W. Danielson & Sons Landesign, Inc. Gene Mace Construction Patio Village, Inc. Onibilt, Inc. R. N. Williams Construction Woitalla Construction PLUMBING Earl W. Day & Sons, Inc. PRIVATE KENNEL LICENSE Roger Farber - Public Safety Report Attached These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the lice sed activity. Pat Solie, Licensing Clerk DATE: JULY 30, 1981 TO: JACK HACKING FROM: NANCY RILEY, ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER SUBJECT: PRIVATE KENNEL LICENSE INVESTIGATION OF 6525 ROWLAND ROAD THE DWELLING IS A PRIVATE HOME IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA. ACCORDINc TO THE CITY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE THE LOT OCCUPIES 10 ACRES. IT IS SECLUDED FROM OTHER NEIGHBORS BY TREES. I OBSERVED A LARGE CHAIN LINK FENCE ENCLOSURE. THE ENCLOSURE WAS CLEAN AND THE DOGS HAD A GARAGE TO GO INTO. THEY OWN ONE FEMALE ROTTWEILER, ONE MALE ROTTWEILER, ONE MALE ROTTWEILER MIX, AND ONE ST. BERNARD MALE TYPE. ALL FOUR DOGS WERE IN THE KENNEL AREA. THE NEIGHBORS COMMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: "NO PROBLEM" "IF THEY KEEP THEM IN THE KENNEL ALL THE TIME". "AS LONG AS THEY KEEP THE DOGS IN. THE FEMALE IS THE AGGRESSIVE ONE WHEN IN SEASON. THEY HAVE BEEN GOOD FOR ABOUT 6 MONTHS". "THEIR FEMALE ATTACKED MY DOG WHILE IN MY YARD ON MAY 10. 1981, THE OWNERS WERE PRESENT AT THAT TIME. THE DOGS RUN DURING THE EVENING HOURS AND THE OWNERS HAVE EVEN CALLED TO LET US KNOW TO BRING OURS INSIDE". t o g