Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 06/02/1981INVOCATION: Paul Redpath PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ) 4 ROLL CALL I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER / MINUTES OF HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING HELD TUESDAY, MAY 19, 1981 Page 1114 A . Request loyyall_ey Place Office Assocl_ates . to.set a Public Hearing date if JOY 7, 1911, for consideration of Industrial Development Donis in the amount_iii—i2-,361,101:00 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TUESDAY, JUNE 2, 1911 HOCNG & REOEVEL•PMENT AUTHORITY MEM1ERS: HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY STAFF,:49,),, t 7:15 PM, CITY HALL Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paulltedpath and George Tangen City Manager Carl Jullie, Finance Director John D. Franc, and Karen Michael, Recording Secretary A r t) ft 0 7-- ftr- A. PUBLIC HEARING Resolution concerning termination of Redevelopment "'strict and Redevelopment Projects and the termination of the Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto (Resolution Ni. HRA 81-0) Page 1115 c.. ADJOURN MEETING ------------------ ------------------------------------- -------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL , ' TUESDAY, JUNE 2, 1981 COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL STAFF: 7:39 PM, CITY HALL Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Eistrom, Paul Redpath and George Tangen City Manager Carl Jullie; City Attorney Roger Pauly; City Engineer Gene lietz; Finance "rector John Franc; Planning Director Chris Enger; Director of Community Services Bob Lambert; and Karen Michael, Recording Secretary APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS MINUTES A. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, May 5 1981 (continued from 5/19/81) Page 1144 B. Lity_Council Meeting held Tuesday, May 19, 1981 Page 1155 CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,June 2, B. Request from NSP for anchor easement on County Read 4 at Round Lake Page 1163 Park C. PUBLIC HEARINGS ' ill A- • ' A. Resolution concerning termination of Redevelopment District and hoe 1166 Redevelopment Projects and the termination of the Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto (Resolution Ni. . $1-117) , I. HARDEE'S RESTAURANT by North Central Food System, Inc. Request to rezone 1.1 acres from Rural to Com-Reg-Service for a Hardee's Restaurant. Located in the Southwest corner of US 16,-212 and Eden Road (Ordinance No. 81-119) Request for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $1,072,516.0 for Minnesota Supply Company (Resolution Ni. $1-94) D. Request for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of 950,111.11 for Volunteers of America Project (Resolution Ni. 81-95) V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 6617 - 6641 Page 1229 VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARIS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Appointment to the Historical & Cultural Commission to fill an unexpired term to 2/28/84 (continued from 5/19/81) B. Report of City Attorney C. Report of City Manager 1. Resolution No. 81-108, establishing a policy of a six-month time Page 1234 limit between 1st and 2nd Readings of Ordinances D. Report of Erector of Community Services 1. Lion's Club donation and request 2. Athletic field improvement at Round Lake Park 3. Preserve Park Bike Trail ' E. Report of City Engineer 1. Receive feasibility report and order Public Hearing for July 7, 1981, I.C. 51-381, Sunnybrook Road (Resolution No. 81-119) F. Report of Finance Director C. Page 11,5 Page 12111 Page 1214 Page 1235 Page 1236 ' Page 1247 VIII. IX. 1. Clerk's License List NEW BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT. iIt UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TUESDAY, MAY 19, 1981 7:30 PM, CITY HALL HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT Wolfgang H. Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Paul Redpath, and George Tangen HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Finance Director John AUTHORITY STAFF: D. Frane, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael INVOCATION: Wolfgang H. Penzel PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: All members present I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Wolfgang H. Penzel. II. MINUTES OF HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING HELD TUEDAY, APRIL 7 1981 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the -Minutes of the Routing & Redevelopment Authority meeting held April 7, 1981. Motion carried with EdStrom and Tangen abstaining. III. DISCUSSION ON TAX INCREMENT FINANCING MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt Resolution 8141, calling a public hearing for Tuesday, June 2, 1981, on termination of redevelopment . projects and redevelopment district and on the termination of the redevelopment plan and tax increment financing plan relating thereto. Motion carried, unanimously IV. ADJOURN MEETING MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Edstrom, to adjourn the meeting at 7:35 p. Motion carried unanimously. CITY OFFICES / 8950 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD / EDEN PRAIRIE. MINNESOTA 55344 / TELEPHONE I612) 937.2262 May 29, 1981 Chairman and Members of the Eden Prairie Housing and Redevelopment Authority City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie,Mn. 55344 Dear Mr. Chairman and Members of the Eden Prairie Housing and Redevelopment Authority: On May 20, 1981 the Eden Prairie Planning Commission received Resolution HRA 81-02, and looks forward to receiving the new plan for review concerning the public improvements outlined In the plan. Sincerely, a Elizabeth Retterath, Vice-Chairperson Planning Commission encl: Planning Commission resolution Resolution.HRA 81-02 ER:jj (_S":,11/ MAY 20, 1981 PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA The Planning Commission has received from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "Authority"), the proposed resolution (the "Termination Resolution") terminating the Eden Prairie (Development) Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan (collectively, the "Plan") approved by the Authority on September 2, 1980, and by the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, on October 7, 1980. The Planning Commission has received the Termination Resolution in connection with the Comprehensive Plan and looks forward to receiving the new plan for review concerning the public improvements outlined in the Plan. The Chairman of the Planning Commission is hereby directed to provide written communication to the Authority and the City Council of the statement made in the preceding paragraph. / HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA HRA RESOLUTION NO. 81-02_ RESOLUTION CONCERNING TERMINATION OF REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AND THE TERMINATION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN RELATING THERETO WHEREAS, the Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the city of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, did on September 2, 1980, approve the creation of a Redevelopment District and Redevelopment Projects and approve the Eden Prairie (Development) Redevelopment Plan and the Tax Increment Financing Plan (collectively, the "Plan") for such Redevelopment District and Redevelopment Projects, all pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462, as amended, and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71 to 273.78, inclusive, as amended; and WHEREAS, the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "City"), did on October 7, 1980, adopt Resolution No. R80-188 approving the creation of a Redevelop- ment District and Redevelopment Projects and the approval of the Eden Prairie (Development) Redevelopment Plan and the Tax Increment Financing Plan (collectively, the "Plan") for such Redevelopment District and Redevelopment Projects, all pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462, as amended, and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71 to 273.78, inclusive, as amended; and WHEREAS, certain members of the Legislature of the State of Minnesota have expressed concern with certain elements of the Plan; and WHEREAS, the Plan has been legally challenged in Hennepin County District Court; and WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of the County of Hennepin has requested that the City disccntinue its Redevelopment Tax Increment District and prepare a plan for an Economic Development Tax Increment District as soon as possible and submit such plan to the Board of Commissioners as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivision 2; and l/l7 Adopted by the Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, on 1981. Chairman ATTEST: Secretary III WHEREAS, the Council deems it advisable, in order to expedite the construction and financing thereof of the public improvements outlined in the Plan, to create a Development District and approve an Economic Development District and a new development plan and tax increment financing plan in - connection therewith, all pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A, as amended, and Minnesota Statutes, tWEETAVE 273.71 to 273.78, inclusive, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Commissioners deem it advisable to terminate the Redevelopment District and Redevelopment projects and the Plan relating thereto. BE IT RESOLVED by the Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, that: Section 1. Termination. The RedevelOpment District and Redevelopment Projects and the Eden Prairie (Development) Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan (attached as Exhibit A hereto and hereby made a part hereof) relating thereto, approved on September 2, 1980, by the Commissioners, are all hereby terminated and such termination is hereby approved. EDEN PRAIRIE (DEVELOPMENT) REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN EDEN PRAIRIE (DEVELOPMENT) REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN The principal area in immediate need of development (redevelopment) is in the vicinity of the Major Center Area and contiguous areas of the City, the local roads and thoroughfares are inadequate to handle the flow of traffic. The inadequacy of these roadways has hindered development of open and undeveloped land in the Major Center Area. The area contains buildings or improvements and is by reason of faulty arrangement of design, deleterious land use or obsolete layout detrimental to the safety and welfare of the City. The open or undeveloped land comprising most of the area is hampered in it's complete development by virtue of physical characteristics of the ground and the present patterns of roadways. Such land is potentially useful and valuable for contributing to the welfare of the City. The Major Center , a 1,000-acre area identified by the Metropolitan Council and the City as a major diversified center, is served by Interstate 494, U.S. Highways 169 and 212, and State Highway 5, making the area readily amenable to development. In 1973, the City Council adopted the MCA Planned Unit Development as an official amendment to its 1968 Comprehensive Guide Plan to provide oppor- tunity for high density commercial, industrial and residential development. In that regard, the City has prepared a master plan for land uses within the Major Center Area, in cooperation with major property owners, the Minnesota D.O.T. and the Metropolitan Council. Substantial development interest has been shown in the Major Center Area, and a significant amount of commercial,and residential developement has occured in recent years, including construction of the Eden Prairie Regional Shopping Center. Nonetheless, the amount of development has not met the expectations of the City. Patronage of the Edon Prairie Regional Shopping Center and other com- mercial developments in the Major Center Area has been hindered by the flZU Page two existing pattern of local roads and thoroughfares. 4[ Development by private enterprise of the open or undeveloped land within the Major Center Area would be materially enhanced by the improvement of local roads and thoroughfares to provide local access from the major federal and state highways serving the area. 'Redevelopment of the open or undeveloped land within the Major Center Area and its vicinity would be significantly more attractive to private . enterprise if local roads, thoroughfares and interchanges were upgraded to provide efficient traffic movement. By their nature, large scale bridges and interchanges cannot be undertaken without government assistance. There has been activated in and for the City a housing and redevelopement authority, created as a public body corporate and politic by Section 462.425, Subdivision 1 of the Act. Said authority is known as the Housing and Redevelop- ment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie. The Projects to be undertaken by the BRA are: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Valley View Road-Mitchell Road to Mcnards and Schooner Blvd. to T.H. 5 2. Schooner Blvd./1-494 Underpass and connection from W. 78th Street via Valley View Road to 1-494 3. Widen T.H. 169/1-494 Bridge and T.H. 169 from W. 78th Street to Valley View Road 4. Schooner Blvd., T.H. 169 to T.H.5 5. Baker/Mitchell Road Connection 6. Widen Valley View Road/I-494 Bridge and ramps to 1-494 7. Valley View Road west of Washington Avenue $1,030,000 7,400,000 • 2,500,000 770,000 420,000 2,500,000 _500,000 $15,120,000 Hi! Page three Special assessments upon property benefited from these improvements may be levied to offset a portion of the projects costs. Previously incurred costs for right of way and engineering, estimated to be $750,000, may also be purchased by the HRA from the City. 'These improvements will stimulate the planned development of the area indicated on pages 74 through 87 of the Eden Prairie MCA Report, and adjacent areas, which is made a part of the document. The estimates of tax increments and bonds issued are as follows: YEAR TAX INCREMENT BONDS ISSUED 1981 $130,000 $ 1,000,000 1982 650,000 6,400,000 1983 240,000 2,400,000 1984 200,000 2,000,000 1985 200,000 2,000,000 1986 200,000 2,000,000 1987 200,000 2,000,000 $17,800,000 Because of the uncertainty of the timing of the future increments the projects will be financed when tax increments are available or when it is probable that they will be available. Under present conditions approximately ' $1,000,000 in captured assessed value is necessary to pay for $1,000,000 of bonds sold. It is recognized that it may not be possible to construct all the improvements indicated within the time constraints established by the laws of the State of Minnesota or the United States of America. Tim increments will be used for repayment of bonds and loans, for the maintenance of reserves, and for the direct payment of costs incurred in carrying out the projects. The authority 'does not intend to acquire any property within the district except all or parts of the followin6 parcels for right-of-way and/or utility easements. The typical right-of-way width is 120 feet. The cost of acquisition is included in the project costs. It is not anticipated that any persons or businesses will be in need of relocation. FRONT FEET OF rogiot P.!. N. PROJECT # PLAT PARCEL RIGHT OF WAY OWNER . 10-116-22-41-0001 1 0-1 16-22-44-0001 14-116-22-32-0002 11-116-22-32-0001 11-116-22-31-3002 11-116-22-24-0002 14-116-22-22-0001 14-116-22-23-0002 14-116-22-23-0004 14-116-22-23-1003 15-116-22-11-0001 14-116-22-11-0027 11-116-22-44-0007 13-116-22-22-0009 14-116-22-31-0004 14-116-22-31-0007 14-116-22-31-0010 11-116-22-13-0002 11-116-22-21-0001 11-116-22-41-0002 11-116-22-31-0001 11-116-22-42-0001 11-116-22-41-0001 1 56710 508 4955 1 56710 504 235 4 56714 5810 1420 1 56711 4010 3135 1 56711 1516 365 1 56711 1540 365 4 56714 8002 1270 4 56714 7260 1655 4 56714 7151 1360 4 56714 7270 100 4 56715 6508 1735 GOLDEN STRIP 2 Outlot A 710 2 Outlot B 830 2 Lot Block 1 440 PRESERVE COMMERCIAL PARK NORTH 4 Lot 1 Block 1 495 4 Lot 1 Block 2 525 4 Lot 4 Block 2 240 6 2200 6 500 6 300 6 500 6 1500 6 1100 AUDITORS SUBDIVISION 225 5 Lot 22 290 5 Lot 23 460 5 Lot 24 320 5 Lot 25 320 5 Lot 26 320 5 Lot 27 330 5 Lot 28 330 5 Lot 29 330 5 Lot 31 330 5 Lot 32 800 Walter Carpenter Walter Carpenter Covenant Living Menards Menards Menards Feeders Inc. John Teman Bermal-Smaby John Teman Feeders Inc. Condon-Naegle Condon-Naegle Condon-Naegle The Preserve The Preserve The Preserve Super Valu Super Valu Park Broadcasting Condon-Naegle Wheaton Schoenfel der E. Ruud E. Ruud E. Ruud E. Ruud E. Ruud L. E. Koskela L. E. Koskela D. Moerer & K. Preblick D. Moerer & K. Preblick D. Moerer & K. Preblick PAR CELS TO AC QUIRE D IN ALL O R PA RT .02% .9% of the discretionary* • levy of captured value or .4% of the total levy per $1,000,000 of captured value. *(T)le term discretionary levy as used here indicates the levies which are made by the school district which are not mandated by the laws relating to state aids for schools). 112A Page five The costs of the district are estimated as follows: Project costs $15,120,000 Previously incurred City Costs 750,000 Administration costs (including staff, legal, and bond issuance costs) 830,000 Capitalized interest 1,100,000 Estimated Bonds to be Issued $17,800,000 Project costs not financed with tax increment bonds, will be financed primarily through special assessment bonds. The HRA intends to use all the increments generated by the distict, however, the HRA may return to the county tax increments it deems to be in excess of those required. Estimate of the impact of the tax increment financing plan on the taxing districts are: HENNEPIN COUNTY for each $1,000,000 in captured value 1979 for 1980 assessed value - 5,002,342,430 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT = .02% per $1,000,000 of captured values m assumed assessed 1979 for 1980 valuation $111,000,000 2.16% effect of $1,000,000 captured value: $ 2,395,000 $110,000,000 . 2.18% .02% 1980 discretionary tax levies $2,395,000 page six The assessed valuation of property and/or tax l e v i e s o f o t h e r t a x i n g districts effected are small in relation to th e s c h o o l d i s t r i c t a n d t h e county and the impact is considered to be miniscu l e . Because of the uncertainty of the timing of the t a x i n c r e m e n t s t h e impact on other taxing districts will probably b e l e s s t h a n i n d i c a t e d d u e to increase in the assessed caluations of those d i s t r i c t s . The tax increment financing district will consis t o f a r e d e v e l o p m e n t project within MSA 273.73 sub. 10 because the l a n d g e n e r a l l y i s n o t p r e - dominantly occupied by buildings, streets, util i t i e s , o r o t h e r i m p r o v e m e n t s , but at least 80 percent of the total acreage of s u c h l a n d h a s a f a i r m a r k e t value upon inclusion in the redevelopment distri c t w h i c h , w h e n a d d e d t o the estimate cost or preparing the land for use, i n c l u d i n g u t i l i t i e s , i f any, exceeds its anticipated fair market value a f t e r c o m p l e t i o n o f s a i d preparation. The district will have a duration of up to 25. years. The captured assess value of the district at its completion i s e s t i m a t e d t o b e i n e x c e s s of $370,000,000. The following parcels are included in the distr i c t : PROJECT BOUNDARY Commencing at the intersection of West 78th Street (TH 5) and Mitchell Road, thence South a distance of 2500' t along Mitchell Road its intersection with Scenic Heights Road; thence East a distance of 2650 feet t from the above intersection; thence South a distance of 4650 feet t to the center line of Research Road, thence South a distance of 550 t; thence East a distance of 2625 feet t to the center of U.S. 169 - 212, thence continue East a distance 775 feet t; thence North along the West boundary line of the Lake Eden South, Lake Eden North plat three and plat two additions, lying South and North of Anderson Lakes Parkway respectively; thence East a distance 3500 feet t to the intersection of Franlo Road and Preserve Blvd; thence North along Preserve Blvd a distance of 650' I; thence East a distance 1300 feet t to the most Northeasterly corner of Northmark Addition; thence Southerly and Easterly along the property line of Northmark Addition to the most Southwesterly corner of Northmark Second Addition; thence Northeasterly and Southeasterly along the property line of Northmark Second Addition to the North line of Basswood Forest; thence Easterly along said North line to the Westerly shore line of Anderson Lake; thence along the Westerly and Northerly shore line of Anderson Lakes; thence North along the Easterly boundary line of the City of Eden Prairie, a distance of about 2200 feet t; thence West a distance of 500 feet t; thence North a distance of 1950 feet t parallel to the Easterly boundary line of the City of Eden Prairie; then West 1000 feet t to the most Southwesterly corner of Norseman Industrial Park 3rd Addition; thence Northerly and Easterly along the property line of said addition to the most Southwesterly corner of Norseman Industrail Park 2nd Addition; thence Northerly along the property line of said addition to the intersection with Valley View Road; thence Westerly a distance of 2800 feet ! along Valley View Road to the North line of the South h of Section 12; thence Westerly along said North line to the West line of Section 12 (East line of Section 11); thence Westerly along the North line of the South ½ of Section 11 the the West shore line of Bryant Lake; thence North- westerly along the shore line of Bryant Lake to the North line of Section 11; thence West on said line to the most Northeasterly corner of Topview Acres 3rd Addition; thence Southeasterly along the property line of said addition to the North line of the South ½ of Section 11; thence West on said line to the North- west corner of said South ½ (Northeast corner of the South )1 of Section 10); thence West on the North line of the South ½ of Section 10 to the Southwesterly corner of Stewart Highlands; thence North along the West boundary line of the Stewart Highlands a distance of 1300 feet t to Valley View Road; thence West a distance of 1300 feet t along Valley View Road to the intersection of Valley View Road and Mitchell-Baker Road; thence Southwesterly along Valley View Road a distance of 1450t to the Southwest corner of Prairie View Addition; thence South a distance of 565 feet t along the West boundary line of Auditor's sub- division No. 225; thence South along Mitchell Road a distance of 850 t; thence Southeasterly parallel •to future Valley View Road a distance of 875 feet t; thence South a distance of 1600 feet t to W-78th Street: thence West along West 78th Street a distance of 1200 feet t to the actual point of beginning. Also a strip of land 100 feet in width the center line of which is described as follows: beginning at the Northwesterly corner of Norseman Industrial Park 2nd Addition; thence Northeasterly approximately 1,200 feet to the intersection of new Valley View Road and Washington Avenue and there termininating. 021, 1. Valley View Road from Washington Avenue to 0.5 miles west. Grading and widening existing road and traffic signal at Washington Avenue. Ha g PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Valley View Road - Mitchell Road to Menards & Schooner Boulevard to T.H. 5. Grading, curb and gutter storm drainage. Sidewalks and bituminous surfacing. 1.37 miles. (NW quadrant) 2. Schooner Boulevard/I-494 underpass and connection from W. 78th St. to Valley View Road. Grading, curb and gutter, storm drainage, sidewalks, bituminous surfacing, bridge, ramps and traffic signals. 0.64 miles. (S5 quadrant) 3. T.H. 169 from W. 78th Street to Valley View Road. Bridge widening and widening T.H. 169 to four lanes. 0.6 miles. 4. Schooner Boulevard T.H. 169 to T.H. 5. Grading, curb and gutter, storm drainage, sidewalks and bituminous surfacing. 0.85 miles. (SW quadrant) 5. Baker/Mitchell Road connection. Grading, curb and gutter, storm drainage, sidewalks and bituminous surfacing along new alignment of Mitchell Road from Valley View Road to Baker Road. 0.5 miles. 6. Widen Valley View Road/I-494 bridge and construct ramps to 1-494 Also grading and widening existing Valley View Road from T.H. 169 to 1-494. 0.75 miles (NE quadrant) Tax Increment Financing Property 1.D. 0 10-116-22-14-0001 10-116-22-31-0001 10-116-22-31-0002 10-116-22-31-0003 10-116-22-31-0004 10-116-22-32-0003 10-116-22-32-0004 10-116-22-33-0001 10-116-22-33-0002 10-116-22-34-0001 10-116-22-41-0001 10-116-22-44-0001 10-116-22-44-0002 .Tax Increment Financing Property I.D. 0 12-116-22-14-0002 12-116-22-14-0003 12-116-22-24-0001 17:116-22-24-0002 12-116-22-24-0003 12-116-22-31-0001 • 12-116-22-31-0003 12-116-22-31-0005 12-116-22-32-0001 12-116-22-32-0002 12-116-22-33-0001 12-116-22-33-0002 12-116-22-33-0004 12-116-22-34-0001 12-116-22-34-0002 12-116-22-34-0004 12-116-22-34•0005 12-116-22-41-0003 12-116-22-42-0002 12-116-22-42-0005 12-116-22-43-0001 12-116-22-43-0002 12-116-22-44-0001 Tax Increment Financing PrgErIXJ.D.# 13-116-22-11-0001 13-116-22-11-0002 13-116-22-11-0003 13-116-22-12-0001 13-116-22-13-0001 13-116-22-13-0003 13-116-22-13-0004 13-116-22-14-0004 13-116-22-14-0005 13-116-22-14-0006 13-116-22-14-0007 13-116-22-22-0005 13-116-22-24-0001 13-116-22-24-0002 13-116-22-33-0048 Tax Increment Financing property 1.0. # l4a16-22-11-0002• 14-116-22-11-0003 14-116-22-11-0004 14-11 .6-22-11-0005 14-116-22-11-0006 14-116-22-11-0007 14-136-22-11-0008 14-116-22-11-0009 14-116-22-11-0010 14-116-22-11-0011 14-116-22-11-0012 14-116-22-11-0013 14-116-22-11-0014 14-116-22-11-0015 14-116-22-11-0016 14-116- 22- 11-002 1 14-116-22-11-0022 14-116-22-12-0001 14-116-22-12-0003 14-116-22-12-0004 14-116-22-12-0003 14-116-22-12-0009 14-116-22-12-0010 14-116-22-13-0002 14-116-22-1-0005 14-116-22-13-0008 14-116-22-13-0011 14-116-22-13-0013 1132.. Tax Increment Financing property I.D. 14-116•22-13-0016 14-116-22-13-0017 14-116-22-13-0018 14-116-22-13-0019 14-116-22-13-0021 14-116-22-13-0022 14-116-22-13-0023 14-116-22-13-0025 14-116-22-14-0001 14-116-22-14-0002 14-116-22-14-0006 14-116-22-14-0007 14-116-22-14-0008 14-116-22-14-0016 14-116-22-13-0014 14-116-22-13-0015 14-116-22-21-0002 14-116-22-21-0003 14-116-22-21-0004 14-116-22-21-0005 14-116-22-22-0001 14-116-22-22-0002 14-116-22-23-0002 14-116-22-23-0003 14-116-22-23-0004 14-116-22-24-0001 14-116-22-24-0002 •. 113S Tax Increment Financing Property I.D. II 14-116-22-24-0003 14-116-22-24-0004 14-116-22-24-0005 14-116-22-24-0006 14-116-22-24-0008 14-116-22-24-0009 14-116-22-31-0001 14-116-22-31-0004 14-116-22-31-0005 14-116-22-31-0006 14-116-22-31-0007 14-116-22-31-0008 14-116-22-31-0009 14-116-22-31-0010 14-116-22-31-0011 14-116-22-31-0012 14-116-22-31-0013 14-116-22-32-0002 14- 116- 22-33-0001 14-116-22-33-0002 14-116-22 .-33-0003 14-116-22-33-0004 14-116-22-33-0005 14-116-22-33-0006 14-116-22-33-0007 14-116-22-33-0008 14-116-22-33-0009 14-116-22-33-0010 ijq Tax Increment Financing Property 1.0.# 1A:116-22-3 3-001 1 14-116-22-33-0012 14-116-22-33-0013 14-116-22-33-0014 14-116-22-33-0015 14-116-22-33-0016 14-116-22-34-0001 14-116-22-34-0003 14-116-22-34-0004 14-116-22-34-0008 14-116-22-34-0009 14-116-22-34-0010 14-116-22-34-0011 14-116-22-34-0012 14-116-22-34-0013 14-116-22-34-0014 14-116-22-34-0015 14-116-22-34-0016 14-116-22-34-0017 14-116-22-34-0018 14-116-22-41-0003 14-116-22-41-0004 14-116-22-42-0003 14-116-22-43-0001 14-116-22-43-0002 14-116-22-43-0003 Tax Increment Financing Property 1.0, 0 14-116-22-43-0004 14-116-22-43-0005 14-116-22-43-0007 ; Tax increment Financing Property 1.D. # 15-116-22-11-0001 15-116-22-12-0001 15-116-22-12-0002 15-1 16-22- 14-0002 15-116-22-21-0001 15-116-22-21-0002 15-116-22-22-0002 15-116-22-22-0003 15-116-22-22-0004 15-116-22-22-0005 15-116-22-22-0006 15-116-22-22-0007 15-116-22-23-0001 15-116-22-24-0001 15-116-22-41-0001 15-116-22-42-0001 15-116-22-43-0001 15-116-22-44-0001 Tax Increment Financing property I.D.# 22-116-22-11-0001 22-116-22-13-0001 22-116-22-14-0001 22-116-22-24-0003 23-116-22-23-0001 23-116-22-23-0002 23-116-22-23-0003 Tax Increment Financing Division 0 792153 Old Numbers- 13-116-22-23-0002 13-116-22-24-0006 13-116-22-24-0007 13-116-22-32-0001 13-116-22-33-0051 13-116-22-34-0026 14-116-22-41-0001 24-116-22-21-0050 New Numbers- 13-116-22-23-0003 13-116-22-23-0004 13-116-22-24-0008 13-116-22-24-0009 13-116-22-24-0010 13-116-22-24-0011 13-116-22-31-0001 13-116-22-32-0002 13-116-22-34-0028 14-116-22-41-0004 24-116-22-21-0051 Tax Increment Financing Division # 792154 Old Numbers- 14-116-22-43-0006 14-116-22-44-0001 23-116-22-11-0001 New Numbers- 14-116-22-43-0008 14-116-22-43-0009 14-116-22-44-0029 14-116-22-44-0030 14-116-22-44-0031 14-116-22-44-0032 14-116-22-44-0033 Division # 800493 Old Number- 10-116-22-42-0001 New Numbers- 10-116-22-42-0002 10-116-22-42-0003 tic Tax increment Financing Division 0 800404 Old Number- 14-116-22-31-0016 New Numbers- 14-116-22-31-0014 14-116-22-31-0015 14-116-22-31-0017 14-116-22-31-0018 Division # 800052 Old Number- 14-116-22-14-0009 New Numbers- 14-116-22-14-0011 14-116l22-14-0012 Tax Increment Financing Division # 000048 & 800049 Old Numbers- 11-116-22-31-0002 11-116-22-32-0001 11-116-22-34-0002 New Numbers- 11-116-22-31-0004 11-116-22-31-0005 11-116-22-32-0002 11-116-22-32-0003 11-116-22-32-0004 11-116-22-32-0005 11-116-22-32-0006 11-116-22-33-0003 11-116-22-33-0004 11-116-22-34-0007 Division # 790016 Old Numbers- 11-116-22-13-0001 11-116-22-24-0001 New Numbers- 11-116-22-13-0002 11-116-22-21-0001 Tax Increment Financing Division # 792021 Old Numbers- . 11-116-22-44-0003 11-116-22-44-0004 12-116-22-33-0003 13-116-22-21-0001 New Numbers- 11-116-22-44-0007 11-116-22-44-0008 12-116-22-33-0006 13-116-22-22-0009 13-116-22-22-0010 13-116-22-22-0011 13-116-22-21-0004 13-116-22-21-0005 14-116-22-11-0027 14-116-22-11-0028 UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 5, 1981 COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: 7:30 PM, CITY MALL Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath, and George Tangen City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Planning Director Chris Enger, Director of Community Service Bob Lambert, Director of Public Safety Jack Hacking, and Recording Sec- retary Karen Michael INVOCATION: Councilman George Bentley ROLL CALL: All members present I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following items were added to VII. C.: 3. Memo re: Public Hearina Policy and 4. Appointment of City Engineer. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to approve the agenda as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. II. flINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, APRIL 21, 1981 MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the minutes of the April 21, 1981, Council meeting as published. Motion carried unanimously. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Ordinance No. 81-07, rezoning properties in the Northeast, (I Southwest quadrants of Co. Ra. 4/TH 5 back into Plan Study B. Alcc 60167 with Mn/DOT for reconstruction of the TH 169/Co. Rd. 1 ALAto,IL I.C. 51-311 (Resolution No. 81-91) C. Receive 100% Petition and order improvements on Franlo Road west of Preserve Blvd. and Darkenwald 1st Addition, I.C. 51-331 (Resolution No. 81-92) D. Final plat approval for Olympic Hills 7th Addition (Resolution No. 81-93) E. Request to set Public Hearing for June 2, 1981, for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $850,000.00 for Volunteers of America Care Facilities Project F. Request to set Public Hearing for June 2 1981, for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $1,072,500.00 for Minnesota Supply Company Project MOTION: Moved by Redpath, seconded by Bentley, to approve items A - F on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes -2- May 5, 1981 IV. PUBLIC MEETING A. Scoping Report for County Road 62 City Manager Jullie stated that notice of tonight's meeting had been published in the Eden Prairie News and that notices had been sent to pro- perty owners. He then introduced Richard Wolsfeld. Richard Wolsfeld, representing BRW, spoke to the Scoping Report. The purpose of the Scoping Report was twofold: 1) first to define all the possible alternatives for the extension of County Road 62 and to then narrow those down to what people could agree to as being reasonable; and 2) to define the key issues that should be focused on in preparing the EIS. He said a meeting will be held at Minnetonka City Hall at 10 a.m. on July 8th at which time cities and agencies would be formally asked to comment on the Scoping Report. He said that there are four areas of concern: aesthetics, noise, wildlife, and water quality. Various issues and impact areas are discussed in the report and were highlighted by Wols- feld. Edstrom asked what the relative cost difference is between the mid-profile and high-profile bridge alternatives. Wolsfeld said about $2.6 million, be- cause of the length of the bridge. The high-profile bridge would be about 20 feet higher than the low-profile bridge. Tangen questioned whether or not there were technical reasons for not including an access at Rowland Road in Alternate 1. Wolsfeld explained there is a hill which would make it extremely expensive, although technically possible, and would necessitate cutting the hill and filling the valley. Tangen said one of the problems, if no access were provided at Rowland Road, would be that people in the area west of the Bryant Lake Park would not have direct access; the route to get there would be a circuitous one. Wolsfeld said the transportation planners and traffic engineers have found that providing access in only one direction, in this case to the west, is only confusing to the motorist and results in people going the wrong way on ramps. Tangen pointed to the "one direction only ramps on Bush Lake Road and 1-494 which appear to work fine and where the situation is similar. Wolsfeld said he felt the more important problem in the Rowland Road case would be the impact on the topography and the area. Bentley recalled that the City has made it known to Hennepin County that the City is not going to build a road connecting Beach and Rowland Roads. He said that any alternatives that are ultimately used should take into account that access has to be made from the west to the Park area. Without the service road, Alternative 1 becomes less desirable. Wolsfeld said meetings had been held with the Park Reserve Staff to discuss the frontage roads and the cost implications. The Park Reserve Staff says they don't have a million dollars to build that frontage road either. Bentley referred to Option 2 which provides for an at-grade crossing at Rowland Road which would allow access from the west. Penzel stated there is another alternative -- that whereby a frontage road would be provided north of the extension of the highway City Council Minutes -3- May 5, 1981 -- an alternative which apparently has not been considered at all because it Isn't shown anywhere. That would avoid the danger of infringment on the Park site which has been cited repeatedly as the major concern. Apparently there is potential right-of-way available on the Minnetonka side, platted already to provide a roadway to accommodate our concern with access to Rowland Road via a frontage road. Wolsfeld stated the platting was 300 feet for the road- way facility, but he thought it not developed at this point and would require additional right-of-way if funds were available. Penzel questioned why 300 feet of right-of-way is necessary when that is typical freeway right-of-way and this is supposedly a four-lane collector street requiring less. Wolsfeld said that they have not looked at frontage road alternatives to the north. Penzel asked whether or not Crosstown extension traffic would "flow-through" ot "T" at County Road 4, the western terminus. Wolsfeld stated that this is obviously a tough design situation. If there was not a wetland the situation would be much simpler. Penzel wondered which "street" would be the one not requiring the off-set; would be the major traffic bearer. Wolsfeld responded it would be County Road 4. Penzel replied that from BRW's traffic estimate this would not make sense as there is twice the volume of traffic on the Crosstown-extended and these vehicles will be made to go around two corners. Wolsfeld concurred that the Crosstown could be made the major thoroughfare with through movements. Penzel questioned what would become of the 12,000 vehicles once they reach County Road 4, since there is no provision for any outlet for the traffic to the west. He said the County now owns the right- of-way north of 62nd Street to provide for a roadway to the west, yet nothing has been addressed to the problem of these vehicles getting to Highway 101. Townline would be the logical extension since County Road 3 and Valley View Road are each in excess of a mile away. Wolsfeld stated the local circulatiOn issue and impact on secondary streets is something they are going to look at. Penzel said when Eden Prairie first approved a concept of the Crosstown exten- sion in design form in 1974 or 1975, commitments were made by the County re- garding road improvements necessary to make this work. Some improvements committed to have been made,largely of necessity, but they hardly lend them- selves to meeting the needs of the ending of a major collector street. Edstrom wondered whether or not consideration had been given to moving the westerly portion of the Crosstown extension to the north to avoid the wetlands. Wolsfeld said consideration had been given but it would require the taking of homes. Edstrom felt it would be a mistake to try to blend either of the roads; that a crossing of the two should be considered. Edstrom asked what our Guide Plan shows in the area between Rowland Road and Shady Oak which might create further problems for us as far as local transportation is concerned. Planning Director Enger replied that low density residential is shown south of the border between Eden Prairie and Minnetonka. The City has considered in the past the impact the terminus of the Crosstown would have and feels the ending, no matter at what point, would put alot of pressure for commercial, office, and/or industrial development. Edstrom asked if Shady Oak and Rowland Roads are adequate to serve community .needs to that area. Enger thought so. Edstrom asked how much the entire project will cost. Wolsfeld guessed $10 - $15 million. He also stated the County has not programmed the improvement west of 494, but that consideration must be given to further improvements because they will impact present decisions. City Council Minutes -4- May 5, 1981 Dean Holasek, 6475 Rowland Road, questioned the need for an off-ramp at the Rowland Road intersection especially if the Park is going to be developed as a quasi-passive area. Director of Community Services Lambert said the Park will be expanded in the same uses it has had in the past -- beach, boat, picnic use, and trails. He said in his talks with County officials they feel the primary access point to serve the regional area of Bryant Park will be off of 494 coming across and going down Rowland. Holasek asked if the Park entrance will be moved. Lambert replied the entrance will be half way between Shady Oak and where the Crosstown will be. Holasek then posed the question: "Where will that traffic exit?" John Palm, 6389 St. John's Drive, asked if consideration had been given to public transportation, whether or not the moraine just west of St. John's Woods has been protected, and wondered why the Crosstown has to go further west than 494. Wolsfeld responded the Metropolitan Transit Commission and the Metropolitan Council call for continued reliance on bus transportation and plans will be developed to be consistent with that. The moraine issue Is new and something about which we were not aware. The option of stopping the Crosstown at 494 is definitely one of the alternatives. Palm expressed a desire to see the pond at the southwest corner of the Baker Road and Townline Road intersection saved. Al Harrison, 6941 Beach Road, expressed concern about the alignment of Beach Road to the east of its present junction with what would be the Crosstown extended and how this forces the residents away from their usual west and southwest focus for Eden Prairie activities. Edstrom said that a bike and pedestrian trail might be brought north along Beach Road as it is now to join a similar trail along the Crosstown/Townline. Warren Gerecke, 6622 Golden Ridge, wondered how drivers would react to two signalized intersections within a short distance. He was concerned that by not considering this a freeway, a situation would be created similar to that where 35W and the Crosstown use the same roadway for a short distance in Rich- field. Susie Hummel, 6362 St. John's Drive, asked whether or not the original plans for the Crosstown were for it to go all the way to 101. Penzel said they were. Edstrom said that if the link between Shady Oak and 494 is built you will have a Crosstown all the way out to 101 -- albeit two-lane gravel in some parts. Harrison asked if something more than just a notice, perhaps a one-page summary of the Scoping Report, could be sent to residents of the area. Penzel asked if the July 8th meeting could be held at 7:30 p.m. which would be a more convenient time for most citizens who would want to attend. MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Edstrom, to instruct Staff to incorporate the comments heard tonight into a formal response which will be considered by the Council prior to the July 8th meeting. Motion carried unanimously. V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 6235 - 6418 MOTION: Moved by Redpath, seconded by Tangen, to approve Payment of Claims Nos. 6235 - 6418. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen, and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 'Ng City Council Minutes -5- May 5, 1981 VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS A. Report from the CAG Highway #18 Study Group (Joe Adams and Jim Osberg) Joseph M.D. Adams and James Osberg, representatives of the Citizens Advisory Group, spoke to the Report. (See attached outline and request.) They pointed out that 4 corridors are under study, with variations within those corridors. They are hopeful that the Normandale crossing will remain as one of the alternatives. Redpath reminded the Council of a 1973 "Metcalf" bill which was passed and to which should now be referred. Edstrom commended Adams and Osberg on a great job and said that their work reflects the attitude of the Council. He stated that a Slopes Ordinance is being studied now and perhaps the question of bluffs should also be considered. City Manager Jullie stated that a letter had been sent to the County regarding the inclusion of Normandale Boulevard north of Old Shakopee Road as a part of the CSAH 18 Study. MOTION; Edstrom moved, seconded by Tangeni to request the County to keep the Normandale optton open, Motion carried unanimously, Further discussion centered on the demolition of the present bridge and the total cost of the project, MOTION; Moved by Edstrom, seconded by Bentley, to ask Staff to prioritize the improvements as Eden Prairie sees them, to adopt a statement regarding the preservation of the bluffs in Eden Prairie, and to draft a position statement allowing Eden Prairie to state to governmental agencies where we stand and what we are asking them to do, Motion carried unanimously, Bentley requested that Adams and Osberg be invited to attend the next meeting of the Slopes Ordinance committee, VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS, & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Appointment of Minnetonka Community Education Council representative MOTION; Tangen moved, seconded by Bentley, to appoint Merle Cam as Eden Prairie's representative to the Minnetonka Community Education Council. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Councilman Bentley - announced there would not be another meeting of the Solid Waste Site Selection Committee, B. Report of City Attorney There was no report. It City Council Minutes -6 - May 5, 1981 C. Report of City Manager • 1. Agreement for right of entry with Golfview Investment Company and rOuitable Life Assurance Company for waterworks improvements MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the right- of-entry agreement for waterworks construction. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Selection of architect for the design of the expansion of Public Safety offices and maintenance facilities City Manager Jullie spoke to his memo of May 1, 1981, in which the process used and fees were discussed, MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to hire Jnterdesign as the architect for the preliminary design of the Public Safety facility. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen, and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously, 3. Public Hearing Policy City Manager Jullie referred to his memo of April 30, 1981, in which he addressed the public hearing policy. MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Redpath, to authorize Staff to again begin setting public hearings for development proposals. Motion carried unanimously. .4. City Engineer appointment City Manager Jullie announced that Eugene Dietz, presently employed by RCM, has accepted the job as City Engineer and will begin working for the City on May 18, 1981. D. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Hockey Rink at Round Lake Park MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Edstrom, to approve construction of an additional hockey rink at Round Lake Park as per recommendations outlined in Community Service Director Lambert's memo of April 6, 1981. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen, and Penzel voted "aye". If ti c) City Council Minutes -7- May 5, 1981 2. Acquisition of the Earl More House Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to his memorandum of April 23, 1981, in which he addressed the acquisition. He recommen- ded that the purchase be budgeted for over a five year period with a contract for deed. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to instruct Staff to pursue the More House purchase based on Lambert's memo. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen, and Penzel voted "aye'. Motion carried unanimously. Earl More, 3107 Eden Prairie Road, invited the Council to come to see the house at any time. 3. Fishing Resource Study Committee Report MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to accept the report of the Fishing Resource Study Committee and to approve the recommendations Included in the report. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Outlots A & B Hidden Ponds Community Services Director Lambert referred to his memo of April 15, 1981, in which he addressed the Hidden Ponds Outlots. Penzel said he was against the City accepting the deeds to the out- lots as it would be setting a precedent. Bentley agreed stating there are several areas in the City where there are such outlots and homeowners' associations might look upon this as an easy out. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, not to accept a deed to Outlots A & B in Hidden Ponds First Addition. Motion carried unanimously. E. Report of Finance Director 1. Clerk's License List The question of a private kennel license for the Rosen's at 10266 Laurel Drive was discussed. Hugh Overstreet, 10246 Laurel Drive, asked what the minimum lot size was for a kennel license to be granted. Ed Murnane. Sherwood Estates, expressed concern that two animals Is adequate for any house. MOTION: Moved by Redpath, seconded by Tangen, to approve the Clerk's License List with the exception of the Rosen's Kennel License which will be continued to May 19, 1981. Motion carried unanimously. -8- City Council Minutes May 5, 1981 VIII. NEW BUSINESS There was none. IX. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Redpath, seconded by Tangen, to adjourn the meeting at 10:54 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MN. From: Joseph M.D.'Adams And James Osberg, DDS Representatives Citizens Advisory Group (CAG) Ref: CSAH 18 Location Study (a 36 month study) I. Membership A. Two members each 1. Hennepin County 2. Scott County 3. Bloomington 4. Savage 5. Shakopee 6. Eden Prairie B. Coordinated by Jim Book of Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. (the consulting contractor to Hennepin County) II. Purpose of the Citizens Advisory Group A. "to work with the consultant and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC).... • to provide insight and feedback from the public for the duration of the process. The CAG will be called upon to express community and and neighborhood attitudes and opinions throughout the location study process." B. "they (CAG) will be asked how to best schedule and announce public meetings and to better insure public involvement." ill. Eden Prairie's stated position regarding the CSAH 18 project. A. To make every effort to support EP's development as outlined in the Master Plan as approved by the MET Council. B. To preserve the "open space" and ecological nature of our community. C. To make every effort to prevent outside influences to force unfair strain on the community. D. To force other communities to accept responsibility for the pressures of growth and development. E. To protect Eden Prairie's investment in existing development by both . business and residents. F. To position our community as a good neighbor. G. To strive for the completion of the 212 corridor, the upgrading of 169, ' as promised by the Met Council, before CSAH 18 becomes a major thoroughfare. IV. Apparent positions taken by other CAG members A. Consultants 1. To lobby for the CSAH 18 corridor as a freeway, if possible, and ignore other commitments since these do not apply to their contracted study. Alternates such as a Normandale crossing had to be forced upon than before they would take this route seriously. 2. To do a thorough job on this study. Bloomington 1. To take a low profile. 2. To insure that the corridor that they set aside. to be used for Freeway with little orno room for alternatives. To lobby and resist all attempts to upgrade Normandale and allow a bridge at this location. 4. To succeed in providing a Freeway at their western boundary (Route 18) not in their community. 5. To insure the success of commercial development between Route 18 and Normandale along Hennepin County 1 (Old Shakopee Road)._ C. Savage, Shakopee, and Scott Counties 1. To provide a crossing to their residents. 2. To balance the CAG for fairness. 3. To insure that any crossing mesh smoothly with their proposed roadway systems. 4. To provide for-the transportational and development needs of their constituents. V. Present .status of CSAH 18 study as understood by your representatives. NOTE: This portion of the report will be presented and will include maps and copies of the first stage report. VI. Present status of the CSAM 18 study A. Corridors now being considered. B. Preliminary design as conceived by the TAC and the Consulting firm. C. Considerations that must be supported. 1: Design considerations. 2. Wildlife considerations. 3. Archeological and historical. 4. Neighborhood. 5. Asthetic. 6. Funding and financial. 1. Previously promised bun not delivered highway commitments. VII. Request for specific recommendations from.the Eden Prairie City • Council so that.your representatives may continue functioning from a position of strength. B. Respectfully submitted, Joseph M.D. Adams James Osberg, DDS. 1153 REQUEST FROM EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL' I. UNIFY VARIOUS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING i.e. 169-212, 62, Ring Road Project II. CALL IN PROMISES FROM HENNEPIN COUNTRY AND STATE OF MINNESOTA BEFORE ANY CONCESSIONS ARE MADE FROM EDEN PRAIRIE REGARDING CSAH 18 PROJECT. III. THE ENACTMENT OF A UNIFIED PLAN TO PRESERVE THE NATURAL STATE OF THE BLUFFS ACROSS THE ENTIRE SOUTH OF EDEN PRAIRIE. IV. ISSUE A FORMAL STATEMENT REGARDING EDEN PRAIRIE'S COMMITMENT DESIGNATING CSAH 18 AS AN ARTERIAL RATHER THAN A FREEWAY ARTERY. V. FORMALLY PETITION BARTON-ASCHMAN AND THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN TO INCLUDE NORMANDALE BOULEVARD NORTH OF OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD AS PART OF THE CSAH 18 STUDY. VI. INITIATE A FORMAL LIASON PROGRAM WITH BLOOMINGTON AND HENNEPIN COUNTY IN HOPES OF BETTER UNDERSTANDING EACH OTHER'S POSITION. VII. SEEK FOR FORMAL COMMITMENT FROM THE MET COUNCIL REGARDING THEIR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. VIII. PETITION ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, U.S. COAST GUARD, BREDE GRAIN ELEVATOR IN SHAKOPEE TO COMMIT REAL NEED FOR COMMERCIAL BOAT TRAFFIC WEST OF NORMANDALE. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 19, 1981 COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: 7:35 PM, CITY HALL Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath, and George Tangen City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City Attorney Roger Pauly, City Engineer Gene Dietz, Finance Director John D. Frane, Planning Director Chris Enger, Direc- tor of Community Services Bob Lambert, and Record- ing Secretary Karen Michael ROLL CALL: All members present The meeting was called to order by Mayor Penzel at 7:35 p.m., immediately following a meeting of the Eden Prairie Housing and Redevelopment Authority. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following items were moved from the Regular Agenda to the Consent Calendar: VII. D. 1. Swedlund property appraisals; VII. D. 2. Earl & Helen More house acquisition; VII. D. 3. Red Rock Park acquisition;-VII. D. 4. Authority to advertise for bids for tennis courts at Middle School and Creekwood Park; VII. E. 1. Consider bids for Lake Idelwild Drainage Outlot, I.C. 51-385 (Resolution No. 81-97); VII. E. 2. Consider bids for im rovements on W. 70th Street I.C. 51-344C Resolution No. 81-98 ; VII. E. . Consider bi s or tra fic signa at TH 169/Anderson Lakes Pkwy., I.C. 51-341A (Resolution No. 81-99). The following item was moved from the Consent Calendar to VII. E. 5. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 81-08, rezoning 4 acres from Rural to Office for town offices (Valley Place Offices) for C.S.J. Development and developer's agreement (formerly III. A.) The following item was added as item VII. C. 1. Right-of-entry agreement with Edenvale. MOTION: Moved by Bentley, seconded by Redpath, to approve the agenda as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, MAY 5, 1981 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to table approval of the May 5, 1981, minutes of the City Council meeting so that more specific concerns which were expressed regarding the CSAH 18 Scoping Report can be included. Motion carried unanimously. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 81-08, rezoning 4 acres from Rural to Office for town office s fValley Place Offices) by C..J. Development and agreement - moved to item VII. E. 5. 115 City Council Minutes -2- May 19, 1981 B. Agreement No.PW 16-49-81 with Hennepin County for channelization and prep- aration for traffic signals at Co. Rd. 4/Valley View Rd., I.C. 51-325IV (Resolution No. 81-101) C. Agreement No. PW 21-48-81 with Hennepin County for road improvements on Co. Rd. 1 at TM 169, I. C. 51-311C (Resolution No. 81-102) D. Old Farm 2nd Addition - preliminary and final plat approval (Resolution No. 81-103) E. Castle Ridge - final plat approval (Resolution No. 81-104) F. Swedlund property appraisals G. Earl & Helen More House acquisition H. Red Rock Park acquisition I. Authority to advertise for bids for tennis courts at Middle School and Creekwood Park J. Consider bids for Lake Idelwild Drainage Outlot, I.C. 51-385 (Resolution No. 81-97) K. Consider bids for improvements on W. 70th Street, I.C. 51-344C (Resolution No. 81-98) L. Consider bids for traffic signal at TH 169/Anderson Lakes Pkwy., I.C. 51-341A (Resolution No. 81-99) MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve items B - L on the Consent Calendar. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen, and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. IV. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 6419 - 6616 Redpath requested that goods be purchased from Eden Prairie firms whenever possible. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to approve Payment of Claims Nos. 6419 - 6616. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen, and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. V. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS There were no reports. VI. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Willow Creek 2nd Addition by Elaine L. Sorensen, Joel R. Harding, & Kathleen J. Harding, John P. Wilkie & Bonita Wilkie, Vernon C. Geiger & Barbara A. Geiger, and Gerald Schoenfelder. Request to replat Willow Creek Farm into 5 residential lots and 3 outlots. Located south of Bryant Lake and west of Flying Cloud Drive. (Resolution No. 81-96) acc, City Council Minutes -3- May 19, 1981 Don Sorensen spoke to the proposal which would replat Willow Creek Farm into 5 residential lots and 3 outlots. Willow Creek Farm is located south of Bryant Lake and west of Flying Cloud Drive. Planning Director Enger stated the Planning Commission had considered this item at its May 11, 1981 meeting and voted to recommend its approval to the Council by a vote of 5-0-2; Levitt abstained for reasons of the Shoreland Management Ordinance, and Bearman abstained because Sorensen is his attorney. The Planning Staff recommended its approval of the preliminary plat in a May 7, 1981 memcOn which four conditions were given. Director of Community Services Lambert said the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission had reviewed the proposal at its May 18, 1981 meeting, and recommended its approval subject to the Planning Staff Report and the Community Services Report which added a scenic easement be placed on the slope facing Bryant Lake at the 870' mark. Bentley asked if there was any concern about the size of the lots. Lambert said that had been determined in a previous review and he requested the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission not to consider that issue. Redpath wondered why City sewer and water were not considered to be a part of this proposal. Sorensen said it was a matter of cost. It was also felt, according to Sorensen, that no problems will be encountered with private septic and water systems. Jullie explained that when the feasibility study was made on this in early 1980,sewer was not available within a reasonable distance. That has changed since then however, but will still be several hundred feet away. Sorensen said it would be at least $90,000 to put City sewer in just a portion of the area -- about $22,500 per lot. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley ., to adopt Resolution No. 81-96, approving the preliminary plat of Willow Creek 2nd Addition. Motion carried with Penzel voting "no". B. equest from Hans Hagen Homes to incorporate an additional quadraminium building type in Northmark 3rd and 4th Addition Bentley indicated he would refrain from discussion on this item -- and would state why after the item had been discussed. Hans Hagen, Hans Hagen Homes (formerly Ban Con), presented a review of the changes to be made. The units presently under construction are referred to as Carriage Houses I and II and are two stories with decks and/or patios. Carriage Houses III and IV, which they wish to add, are smaller in floor area and about seven feet shorter in height. The latter have one car garages while the former have two stall garages. Planning Director Enger said the Planning Commission had voted 3-2-2 to approve the proposal; Bearman abstained because he felt the change was not significant enough to come before the Planning Commission, Sutliff abstained but did not give a reason, Levitt and Torjesen voted "no" based on comments by neighborhood residents. The Planning Staff had recommended approval of the change based on the rationale that in most quadraminium developments there Is very little variety and the addition of another housing type would be welcomed. /159 City Council Minutes -4- May 19, 1981 Rick Blesi, 11115 Lanewood Circles, expressed concern about the size of the proposed units compared to the size of the homes in the area and what this would do to the value of the homes. Bob Dunbar, 11270 Lanewood Circles, said he and several other neighborhood residents had met with Hans Hagen earlier this evening and they arrived at a "working relationship" regarding the Tatter. Redpath asked what the residents and Hagen had worked out. Dunbar said Hagen had invited them to go to Eagan to see units which have already been built and then get back to him with their opinion. Les Sebo, 11275 Lanewood Circles, stated he was originally opposed to townhouse, condominium, or anything other than single family dwellings in Northmark 3 and 4; however, he has now accepted the "quad concept" as originally proposed. He is not certain about the proposal. His concern is with the one car garage; does this meet code? Enger said that it does meet the Zoning Ordinance requirements. Blesi asked if there were any restrictions as to how many small and how many big units could be built. Hagen said he preferred to let the market dictate this. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to grant the request from Hans Hagen Homes to incorporate an additional quadraminium building type In Northmark 3rd and 4th Addition, including a modification of the developers agreement. Motion carried with Bentley abstaining because of previous liti- gation against Hans Hagen Homes/Ban Con. VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Appointment to the Historical & Cultural Commission to fill an unexpired term to 2/28/84 Laid over to June 2, 1981, meeting. 2. Mayor Fenzel - The Council might wish to consider adopting a policy establishing a deadline for 2nd Readings of Rezonings. The City currently has five on file which were first read in 1980. The Council agreed it would be advisable to request Staff to draft a policy in this regard. B. Report of City Attorney 1. Discussion on Tax Increment Financing MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No. 81-106, calling a public hearing on termination of redevelopment district and re- development projects and on the termination of the redevelopment plan and tax increment financing plan relating thereto. Motion carried unanimously. /15-3 City Council Minutes -5- May 19, 1981 C. Report of City Manager City Manager Jullie introduced Eugene Dietz, City Engineer and Director of Public Works, who began working for the City yesterday. 1. Right-of-entry agreement with Edenvale City Manager Jul He explained the need for the right-of-entry agreement changes and recommended the Council adopt the agreement as amended. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt the right-of-entry agreement with Edenvale as amended. Motion carried unanimously. D. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Swedlund property appraisals Moved to the Consent Calendar as item III. F. 2. Earl & Helen More House acquisition Moved to the Consent Calendar as item III. G. 3. Red Rock Park acquisition Moved to the Consent Calendar as item III. H. 4. Authority to advertise for bids for tennis courts at Middle School and Creekwood Park Moved to the Consent Calendar as item III. I. E. Report of City Engineer 1. Consider bids for Lake Idelwild Drainage Outlot, I.C. 51-385 (Resolution No. 81-97) Moved to the Consent Calendar as item III. J. 2. Consider bids for improvements on W. 70th Street, I.C. 51-344C (Resolution No. 81-98) Moved to the Consent Calendar as item III. K. 3. Consider bids for traffic signal at TH 169/Anderson Lakes Pkwy., I.C. 51-341A (Resolution No. 81-99) Moved to the Consent Calendar as.item III. L. 4. Receive feasibility report and order utility improvements for Valley Place Office Park, I.C. 51-409 (Resolution No. 81-100) City Council Minutes -6- May 19, 1981 City Manager Jullie spoke to the issue and referred to the feasibility report dated April 1981. He also stated that both property owners had signed a petition requesting that improvements be made. Penzel referred to a letter dated May 18, 1981, from William J. Bear- man whose property is adjacent to the subject property and who is one of those requesting the improvements. In the letter Beaman said there is a dispute as to the title to the northerly 11.34 feet and the easterly 350 feet of the property in question. He requested that there be no erection or intrusion upon this disputed property and requested the City not to issue permits which would adversely affect the property. Seaman was in the audience and stated that the Hillgers have closed on the property, but did not get Title Insurance on the portion under dispute. Bill Jacobson, one of the three developers of G.S.J. Development, said he did not see any reason why the land dispute should prevent the sewer from going in since both parties had agreed to it. Penzel questioned the matter of storm drainage which was referred to in a letter of May 18, 1981, from George C. Hoff, attorney for Herleiv Helle. City Engineer Dietz explained that 95% - 98% of the property will be drained to the northwest towards Valley View Road and into the ditch system. Bentley questioned whether or not improvements could be ordered before 2nd Reading is given to rezoning the property which is the next item on the agenda. At this point action was taken on item VII. E. S. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt Resolution No. 81-100, receiving report, ordering improvements and preparation of plans and specifications for improvements in Valley Place Office Park, I.C. 51-409. Motion carried with Tangen abstaining. *5. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 81-08, rezoning 4 acres from Rural to Office for town offices (Valley Place Offices) by C.S.J. Development and develop- Fs s agreement (formerly III. A.) MOTION: Moved by Redpath, seconded by Edstrom, to give 2nd Reading to Ordinance No. 81-08, rezoning 4 acres from Rural to Office for town offices (Valley Place Offices) by C.S.J. Development. Motion carried with Tangen voting "no". MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to approve the developer's agreement subject to any amendment which might be necessary to provide for utility easements in the area where the title is under dispute. Motion carried with Tangen abstaining. City Council Minutes -7- May 19, 1981 Dennis Baker, 9219 Lake Riley Boulevard, President of the Lake Riley Im- provement Association asked for clarification on the action taken on the Swedlund property acquisition. Penzel explained the action. Baker went on to express the concerns of area residents. The Council concurred with Mayor Penzel that Director of Community Services Lambert would review the situation; City Manager Jullie would look into some of the traffic problems; and, if necessary, the members of the Homeowner's Association could bring issues before the Council so they might be able to further deliberate them. F. Report of Finance Director 1. Consider proposals for the City's insurance Finance Director Frane spoke to his memo of May 15, 1981, which summarized the insurance proposals. He explained the League Trust is an agency which is an off-shoot of the League of Minnesota Munici palities. The three agencies submitting bids were: M.E. Lane, League Trust, and Horizon. M.E. Lane, M.E. Lane Agency, explained why there is difference in the cost of the umbrella policy. Bill Homeier, Horizon Agency President, said they were $6,000 lower on the umbrella policy last year also. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to award the basic coverage policy to the M.E. Lane Agency for $79,436; the Public Officials cover- age to the M.E. Lane Agency for $2,446; and the umbrella policy to the Horizon Agency for $3,800. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen, and Penzel all voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 2. Clerk's License List City Attorney Pauly spoke to his memo to the Council dated May 12, 1981. Ordinance 134 requires a minimum of one acre for a kennel license. It appears exceptions have been made in the past. He called attention to the memo from Frane re: Private Kennel Licenses which listed the location of private kennels. Tangen thought it would be proper to allow this license to be granted providing no new dogs could be licensed. Edstrom expressed concern on voting for somthing which is not in com- pliance with an Ordinance. Penzel noted that the public should be made aware of licensing of dogs as well as the fact that the Ordinance only allows two dogs on less than an acre. Staff was directed to see that notices are placed in "Happenings" and local newspapers regarding dog licensing and the Ordinance governing the licensing. utp1 City Council Minutes -8- Mlay 19, 1981 MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the kennel licenses -- I) Rosens at 10266. Laurel Drive and 2) Reniers at 13895 Holly Road -- with the condition that these kennel licenses will not be renewed once one of the animals is gone. Motion carried with Edstrom voting "no". MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Bently, to approve the remaining items on the Clerk's License List. Motion carried unanimously. VIII. NEW BUSINESS There was none. . IX. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adjourn the meeting at 9:52 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. EASEMENT 30111917 292313411 KNOW ALL. MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, hereinafter called "Grantor", in considers of the turn of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration to Grantor in hand paid by Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter called "NSP", does hereby grant unto NSP, iu successors and assigns, the perpetual right; privilege and easement to construct, operate, maintain, use, rebuild, or remove electric transmission lines with all towers, structures, poles. crossarms, cables, wires, guys, supports, counterpoises, fixtures, and devices used or useful in the operation, maintenance and use of said lines through, over, under and across the following described lands situated in the County of Hennevin State of Minnesota. to wit: The North Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 22 West. Beginning at a point on the south line of the North Half of Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 22 West a distance of 1666.07 feet west of section corner thereof, then east along the south line a distance of 250 feet, to the west line of C.S.A.H. 84, thence north along said west line a distance of 400 feet, then west and parallel to the south a distance of 250 feet, then south to the point of beginning. Except for the right of access, the rights granted herein shall be limited to a strip of land 10 feet in width, said strip being 5 feet on either side of the following described line for overhead guy pole and anchors; Commencing at the East Quarter corner of said section; thence north along the east line of said section a distance of 24 feet, thence 87 degrees 02 minutes left a distance of 1311 feet; thence approximate 5 degrees 15 minutes right a distance of 182 feet (plus or minus); thence approximately 81 degrees 30 minutes to the right a distance of 235 feet (plus or minus) to the point of beginning of line to be described; thence 91 degrees 0 minutes to the left for a distance of 140 feet (plus or minus) and there terminating. The rights granted herein may be exercised at any time subsequent to the execution of this document. The grant herein contained shall also include the right to erect, at any time prior to the construction of the said transmission lines, reasonable signs for the purpose of monumenting the boundaries of this easement. Said transmission lines and supporting structures from time to time may be reconstructed or relocated on said strip of land with changed dimensions and to operate at different voltages. The grant of easement herein contained shall also include the right of NSP to have reasonable access to said strip of land across the property of Grantor adjacent thereto, said access to be designated by Grantor within a reasonable time upon request by NSP. The grant of easement herein contained shall include the right to enter upon the property of Grantor to survey for and locate said transmission lines and shall also include the right to remove from said strip of land any structures, littS (including branches of trees overhanging said strip of land) or objects, except fences, which in the opinion of NSP will interfere with said transmission lines. The grant herein contained shall also include the right of NSP to permit the attachment of wires of others to the structures supporting said transmission lines, Grantor reserves the right to cultivate, use and occupy said strip of land, except that, Grantor shall not erect any structures or other objects. permanent or temporary, except fences, thereon. Grantor further agrees that he will not perform any act which will interfere wither endanger said transmission lines and further, shall not plant any trees upon said strip without the prior expressed written approval from NSP. Grantor also reserves the right to dedicate and have or permit cube improved. maintained, and used for the purposes of streets, curbs and gutters, sewers, water and under. ground utilities (hereinafter called "improvements"), the position al said right of way not occupied by the structures supporting Northern States Power Company's electric transmission system, provided that said improvements do not alter the existing ground elevations, nor do they impair the structural or electrical integrity of said transmission system; and movided further that all such improvements shall not result in a ground clearance of less than the minimum requirements specified by the National Electrical Safety Code. • • • • • •••••••• • • OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO NSP File No 2-A Location No. Name City of Eden Prairie Line No D134 810102 E No Mortgage 110 I as. STATE OF COUNTY OF NSP shall pay for all damages to landscaping, roads and driveways. fences, livestock, crops and fields caused by the construction or maintenance of said transmission lines. Claims on account of such damages may be referred to ten nearest office. Grantor covenants with NSF, its successors and assigns, that Grantor is the owner of the above described premises and has the right to sell and convey an easement in the manner and form aforesaid. The rights herein granted are subject to existing rights of way for highways, roads, railroads, pipelines. canals, laterals. ditches or other electric transmission lines and telegraph and telephone lines heretofore granted across any part of the lands affected by this instrument. The Grantor agrees to execute and deliver to NSP, at NSP's cost, without additional compensation any additional documents needed to correct the legal description of the easement area to conform to the right of way actually occupied by the transmission lines. . It is mutually understood and agreed that this instrument coven all the agnements and stipulations between the parties and that no representation or statements, verbal or written, have been made modifying, adding to or changing the terms hereof. This instrument is exempt from the Minnesota Deed Tax. This instrument was drafted by Northern States Power Company, 414 Nicollet Mall. Minneapolis, Minnesota. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be duly executed as of the day of 19 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 19 by NOTARY PUBLIC The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 10 by (MAW AND TIM) (WWI OTCOSSOISATION ACANOMILOGING( WATT or PIACI OS PION TORAT/0011 corporation, on behalf of the corporation. IOW 17.11* ISACRI NOTARY PUBLIC )11 STA. 20C +03,5 - 34.6' Li 18"1179. REtICY7 COR, v_Ae -777' P.O.T. 200 +18.7 . P.O.T. 100 + 00.0 WALLEY VIEW RD.) 1-S -F LIBP AR'. INF. 8618 C.81G. _ e" , (b17 PAPKING) N. B. L 78—k- - R.P. 40°04K-66.18' 1- S- F GROCERY "a TOP OF NY 14 CITY OFFICES / 8950 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD/ EDEN PRAIRIE. MINNESOTA 55344 / TELEPHONE I612) 9374282 May 29, 1981 Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344 Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: On May 20, 1981 the Eden Prairie Planning Commission received Resolution No. HRA 81-02, and looks forward to receiving the new plan for review concerning the public improvements out- lined in the plan. Sincerely, Elizabeth Retterath, Vice-Chairperson Planning Commission encl: Planning Commission resolution Resolution HRA 81-02 - ER:jj MAY 20, 1981 PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA The Planning Commission has received from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "Authority"), the proposed resolution (the "Termination Resolution") terminating the Eden Prairie (Development) Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan (collectively, the "Plan") approved by the Authority on September 2, 1980, and by the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, on October 7, 1980. The Planning Commission has received the Termination Resolution in connection with the Comprehensive .Plan and looks forward to receiving the new plan for review concerning the public improvements outlined in the Plan. The Chairman of the Planning Commission is hereby directed to provide written communication to the Authority and the City Council of the statement made in the preceding paragraph. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 81-107 RESOLUTION CONCERNING TERMINATION OF REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AND THE TERMINATION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN RELATING THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "City"), did on October 7, 1980, adopt Resolution No. R80-188 approving the creation of a Redevelopment District and Redevelopment Projects and approving the Eden Prairie (Development) Redevelopment Plan and the Tax Increment Financing Plan (collectively, the "Plan") for such Redevelopment District and Redevelopment Projects, all pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462, as amended, and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71 to 273.78, inclusive, as amended; and WHEREAS, certain members of the Legislature of the State of Minnesota have expressed concern with certain elements of the Plan; and WHEREAS, the Plan has been legally challenged in Hennepin County District Court; and WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of the County of Hennepin has requested that the City discontinue its Redevelopment Tax Increment District and prepare a plan for an Economic Development Tax Increment District as soon as possible and submit such plan to the Board of Commissioners as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivision 2; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it advisable, in order to expedite the construction and financing thereof of the public improvements outlined in the Plan, to create a Development District and approve an Economic Development District and a new development plan and tax increment financing plan in connection therewith, all pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A, as amended, and Minnesota Statutes,' Sections 273.71 to 273.78, inclusive, as amended. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, that: . ATTEST: City Clerk MA . Section 1. Termination. The Redevelopment District and Redevelopment Projects and the Eden Prairie (Development) Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan (attached as Exhibit A hereto and hereby made a part hereof) relating thereto, approved on October 7, 1980, by the Council pursuant to Resolution No. R80-188, are all hereby terminated and such termination is hereby approved. Section 2. New Plan. The Council desires to create a Development District and approve an Economic Development District and a new development plan and tax increment financing plan relating thereto, and hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager, Director of Finance and other members of the staff of the City to prepare a new development plan and tax increment financing plan in consultation with the City Attorney, Bond Counsel and Financial Consultants to the City, all pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes .; Chapter 02A, as amended, and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71 to 213,784 inclusive, as amended. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, on , 1981. Mayor nib EDEN PRAIRIE (DEVELOPMENT) REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN EDEN PRAIRIE (DEVELOPMENT) REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN The principal area in immediate need of development (redevelopment) is .in the vicinity of the Major Center Area and contiguous areas of the City, • the local roads and thoroughfares are inadequate to handle the flow of traffic. The inadequacy of these roadways has hindered development of open and undeveloped land in the Major Center Area. The area contains buildings or improvements and is by reason of faulty arrangement of design, deleterious land use or obsolete layout detrimental to the safety and welfare of the City. The open or undeveloped land comprising most of the area is hampered in its complete development by virtue of physical characteristics of the ground and the present patterns of roadways. Such land is potentially useful and valuable for contributing ta the welfare of the City. The Major Center , a 1,000-acre area identified by the Metropolitan Council and the City as a major diversified center, is served by Interstate 494, U.S. Highways 169 and 2124 and State Highway 5, making the area readily amenable to development. In 1973, the City Council adopted the MCA Planned Unit Development as an official amendment to its 1968 Comprehensive' Guide Plan to provide oppor- tunity for high density commercial, industrial and residential development. In that regard, the City has prepared a master plan for land uses within the Major Center Area, in cooperation with major property owners, the Minnesota D.O.T. and the Metropolitan Council. Substantial development interest has been shown in the Major Center Area, and a significant amount of commercial and residential developcmcnt has occured in recent years, including construction of the Eden Prairie Regional Shopping Center. Nonetheless, the amount of development has not mat the expectations of the City. Patronage of the Eden Prairie Regional Shopping Center and other com- mercial developments in the Major Center Area has been hindered by the ill Page two existing pattern of local roads and thoroughfares. Development by private enterprise of the open or undeveloped land within the Major Center Area would be materially enhanced by the improvement of local roads and thoroughfares to provide local access from the major federal and state highways serving the area. Redevelopment of the open or undeveloped land within the Major Center Area and its vicinity would be significantly more attractive to private enterprise if local roads, thoroughfares and interchanges were upgraded to provide efficient traffic movement. By their nature, large scale bridges and interchanges cannot be undertaken without government assistance. There has been activated in and for the City a housing and redevelopement authority, created as a public body corporate and politic by Section 462.425, Subdivision 1 of the Act. Said authority is known as the Housing and Redevelo p - ment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie. The Projects to be undertaken by the HRA are: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Valley View Road-Mitchell P-ad to. Menards and Schooner Blv0. to T.H. 5 $1,030,000 2. Schooner Blvd./I-494 Urderpass and connection from W. 78t11 Street via Valley View Road to I-494 3. Widen T.H. 169/1-494 Bridge and T.H. 169 from W. 78th Street to Valley View Road 4. Schooner Blvd., T.H. 169 to T.H.5 5. Baker/Mitchell Road Connection 6. Widen Valley View Road/I-494 Bridge and ramps to 1-494 7. Valley View Road west of Washington Avenue 7,400,000 2,500,000 770,000 420,000 2,500,000 500,000 $15,120,000 Page three Special assessments upon property benefited from these improvements may be levied to offset a portion of the projects costs. Previously incurred 'costs for right of way and engineering, estimated to be $750,000, may also be purchased by the BRA from the City. These improvements will stimulate the planned development of the area indicated on pages 74 through 87 of the Eden Prairie MCA Report, and adjace n t areas, which is made a part of the document. The estimates of tax increments and bonds issued are as follows: YEAR TAX INCREMENT BONDS ISSUED 1981 $130,000 $ 1,000,000 1982 650,000 6,400,000 1983 240,000 2,400,000 1984 200,000 2,000,000 1985 200,000 2,000,000 1986 200,000 2,000,000 . 1987 200,000 2,000,000 • $17,800,000 Because of the uncertainty of the timing of the future increments the projects will be financed when tax increments are available or when it is probable that they will be available. Under present conditions approximately $1,000,000 in captured assessed valme is necessary to pay for $1,000,000 of bonds sold. It is recognized that it may not be possible to construct all the improvements indicated within the time constraints established by the laws of the State of Minnesota or the United States of America. Tax increments will be used for repayment of bonds and loans, for the maintenance of reserves, and for the direct payment of costs incurred in carrying out the projects. The authority does not intend to acquire any property within the district except all or parts of the following parcels for right-of-way and/or utility easements. The typical right-of-way width is 120 feet. The cost of acquisition is included in the project costs. It is not anticipated that any persons or businesses will be in need of relocation. AUDITORS SUBDIVISION 225 5 Lot 22 5 Lot 23 5 Lot 24 5 Lot 25 5 Lot 26 5 Lot 27 5 Lot 28 5 Lot 29 5 Lot 31 5 Lot 32 290 E. Ruud 460 E. Ruud 320 E. Ruud 320 E. Ruud 320 E. Ruud 330 L. E. Koskela 330 L. F. Koskela 330 D. Moerer & K. Preblick 330 D. Moerer & K. Preblick 800 D. Moerer & K. Preblick P.i.N. 10-116-22-41-0001 10-116-22-44-0001 14-115-22-32-0002 11-116-22-32-0001 11-116-22-31-0002 11-115-22-24-0002 14-116-22-22-0001 14-116-22-23-0002 14-116-22-23-0004 14-116-22-23-1003 15-116-22-11-0001 14-116-22-11-0027 11-116-22-44-0007 13-116-22-22-0009 14-116-22-31-0004 14-116-22-31-0007 14-116-22-31-0010 11-116-22-13-0002 -- - 11-116-22-21-0001 11-116-22-41-0002 .11-116-22-31-0001 11-116-22-42-0001 11-116-22-41-0001 PROJECT # 1 1 4 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 4 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 6 FRONT FEET OF PLAT PARCEL RIGHT OF WAY 56710 508 4955 56710 504 235 56714 5810 1420 56711 4010 3135 56711 1516 365 56711 1540 365 56714 8002 1270 56714 7260 1655 56714 7151 1360 56714 7270 100 56715 6508 1735 GOLDEN STRIP Outlot A 710 Outlot 8 830 Lot Block 1 440 PRESERVE COMMERCIAL PARK NORTH Lot 1 Block 1 • 495 Lot 1 Block 2 525 Lot 4 Block 2 240 .2200 500 300 500 1500 1100 OWNER Walter Carpenter Walter Carpenter Covenant Living Men&rds Menards Menards Feeders Inc. John Teman Bermal-Smaby John Teman Feeders Inc. Condon-Naegle Condon-Naegle Condon-Naegle The Preserve The Preserve The Preserve Super Valu Super Valu Park Broadcasting Condon-Naegle Wheaton Schoenfelder PA RC ELS TO AC QUIRED IN ALL O R P A RT Page five The costs of the district are estimated as follows: Project costs $15,120,000 Previously incurred City Costs 750,000 Administration costs (including staff, legal, and bond issuance costs) 830,000 Capitalized interest 1,100,000 Estimated Bonds to be Issued $17,800,000 Project costs not financed with tax increment bonds, will be financed primarily through special assessment bonds. The HRA intends to use all the increments generated by the distict, however, the HRA may return to the county tax increments it deems to be in excess of those required. Estimate of the impact of the tax increment financing plan on the • taxing districts are: HENNEPIN COUNTY for each $1,000,000 in captured value 1979 for 1980 assessed value - 5,002,342,430 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT = .02% per $1,000,000 of captured values 1980 discretionary tax levies $2,395,000 = 2.16% assumed assessed 1979 for 1980 valuation $111,000,000 effect of $1,000,000 captured value: $ 2,395,000 $110,000,000 = 2.18% .02% 2.16% = .9% of the discretionary* levy of captured value or .4% of the total levy per $1,000,000 of captured value. *(The term discretionary levy as used here indicates the levies which ar e made by the school district which are not mandated by the laws relating to state aids for schools). page six The assessed valuation of property and/or tax levies of other taxing districts effected are small in relation to the school district and the county and the impact is considered to be miniscule. Because of the uncertainty of the timing of the tax increments the impact on other taxing districts will probably be less than indicated due to increase in the assessed caluations of those districts. The tax increment financing district will consist of a redevelopment project within BSA 273.73 sub. 10 because the land generally is not pre- dominantly occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or other improvements, but at least 80 percent of the total acreage of such land has a fair market value upon inclusion in the redevelopment district which, when added to the estimate cost or preparing the land for use, including utilities, if any, exceeds its anticipated fair market value after completion of said preparation. The district will have a duration of up to 25 years. The captured assess value of the district at its completion is estimated to be in excess of $370,000,000. The following parcels are included in the district: PROJECT BOUNDARY Commencing at the intersection of West 78th Street (TH 5) and Mitchell Road, thence South a distance of 2500 t along Mitchell Road its intersection with Scenic Heights Road; thence East a distance of 2650,feet ± from the above Intersection; thence South a distance of 4650 feet I to the center line of Research Road, thence South a distance of 550 t; thence East a distance of 2625 feet t to the center of U.S. 169 - 212, thence continue East a distance 775 feet t; thence North along the West boundary line of the Lake Eden South, Lake Eden North plat three and plat two additions, lying South and North of Anderson Lakes Parkway respectively; thence East a distance 3500 feet t to the intersection of Franlo Road and Preserve Blvd; thence North along Preserve Blvd a distance of 650' t; thence East a distance 1300 feet t to the most Northeasterly corner of Northmark Addition; thence Southerly and Easterly along the property line of Northmark Addition to the most Southwesterly corner of Northmark Second Addition; thence Northeasterly and Southeasterly along the property line of Northmark Second Addition to the North line of Basswood Forest; thence Easterly along said North line to the Westerly shore line of Anderson Lake; thence along the Westerly and Northerly shore line of Anderson Lakes; thence North along the Easterly boundary line of the City of Eden Prairie, a distance of about 2200 feet t; thence West a distance of 500 feet t; thence North a distance of 1950 feet t parallel to the Easterly boundary line of the- City of Eden Prairie; then West'1000 feet t to the most Southwesterly corher of Norseman Industrial Park 3rd Addition; thence Northerly and Easterly along the property line of said addition to the most Southwesterly corner of Norseman Industrail Park 2nd Addition; thence Northerly along the property line of said addition to the intersection with Valley View Road; thence Westerly a distance of 2800 feet t along Valley View Road to the North line of the South 11 of Section 12; thence Westerly along said North line to the West line of Section 12 (East line of Section 11); thence Westerly along the North line of the South 1/2 of Section 11 the the West shore line of Bryant Lake; thence North- westerly along the shore line of Bryant Lake to the North line of Section 11; thence West on said line to the most Northeasterly corner of Topview Acres 3rd Addition; thence Southeasterly along the property line of said addition to the North line of the South 1/2 of Section 11; thence West on said line to the North- west corner of said South 1/2 (Northeast corner of the South 1/2 of Section 10); thence West on the North line of the South 1/2 of Section 10 to the Southwesterly corner of Stewart Highlands; thence North along the West boundary line of the Stewart Highlands a distance of 1300 feet t to Valley View Road; thence West a distance of 1300 feet t along Valley View Road to the intersection of Valley View Road and Mitchell-Baker Road; thence Southwesterly along Valley View Road a distance of 1450t to the Southwest corner of Prairie View Addition; thence South a distance of 565 feet t along the West boundary line of Auditor's sub- division No. 225; thence South along Mitchell Road a distance of 850 t; thence Southeasterly parallel to future Valley View Road a distance of 875 feet t; thence South a distance of 1600 feet t to W-78th Street: thence West along West 78th Street a distance of 1200 feet t to the actual point of beginning. Also a strip of land 100 feet in width the center line of which is described as follows: beginning at the Northwesterly corner of Norseman Industrial Park 2nd Addition; thence Northeasterly approximately 1,200 feet to the intersection of new Valley View Road and Washington Avenue and there tennininating. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Valley View Road - Mitchell Road to Menards 8 Schooner Boulevard to T.H. 5. Grading, curb and gutter storm drainage. Sidewalks and bituminous surfacing. 1.37 miles. (NW quadrant) • 2. Schooner Boulevard/I-494 underpass and connection from W. 78th St. to Valley View Road. Grading, curb and gutter, storm drainage, sidewalks, bituminous surfacing, bridge, ramps and traffic signals. 0.64 miles. (S5 quadrant) 3. T.H. 169 from W. 78th Street to Valley View Road. Bridge widening . and widening T.H. 169 to four lanes. 0.6 miles. 4. Schooner Boulevard T.H. 169 to T.H. 5. Grading, curb and gutter, storm drainage, sidewalks and bituminous surfacing. 0.85 miles. (SW quadrant) 5. Baker/Mitchell Road connection. Grading, curb and gutter, storm drainage, sidewalks and bituminous surfacing along new alignment of Mitchell Road from Valley View Road to Baker Road. 0.5 miles. 6. Widen Valley View Road/1-494 bridge and construct ramps to 1-494 Also grading and widening existing Valley View Road from T.H. 169 to 1-494. 0.75 miles (NE quadrant) 7. Valley View Road from Washington Avenue to 0.5 miles west. Grading and widening existing road and traffic signal at Washington Avenue. Tax Increment Financing Property 1.0. 0 10-116-22-14-0001 10-116-22-31-0001 10-116-22-31-0002 10-116-22-31-0003 10-116-22-31-0004 10-116-22-32-0003 10-116-22-32-0004 10-116-22-33-0001 10-116-22-33-0002 10:116-22-34-0001 10-116-22-41-0001 10-116-22-44-0001 10-116-22-44-0002 Tax Increment financing Propcsly 1.D. 0 11-116-22-24-0002 11-116-22-31-0001 11-116-22-33-0001 11-116-22-33-0002- 11-116-22-34-0001 11-116-22-34-0003 11-116-22-34-0004 11-116-22-34-0005 11-116-22-34-0006 11-116-22-41-0001 11-116-22-41-0002 11-116-22-41-0003 11-116-22-42-0001 11-116-22-43-0001 11-116-22-44-0001 11-116-22-44-0002 11-116-22-24-0003 11-116-22-24-0004 11-116-22-24-0005 11-116-22-24-0006 11-116-22-24-0007 11-116-22-24-0008 11-116-22-24-0009 11-116-22-24-0010 11-116-22-13-0001 Tax Increment Financing Property 1.0. M 12-116-22-14-0002 12-116-22-14-0003 12-116-22-24-0001 12416-2-2-24-0002 12-116-22-24-0003 12-116-22-31-0001 12-116-22-31-0003 12-116-22-31-0005 12-116-22-32-0001 12-116-22-32-0002 12-116-22-33-0001 12-116-22-33-0002 12-116-22-33-0004 12-116-22-34-0001 12-116-22-34-0002 12-116-22-34-0004 12-116-22-34•005 12-116-22-41-0003 12-116-22-42-0002 12-116-22-42-0005 12-116-22-43-0001 12-116-22-43-0002 12-116-22-44-0001 Tax Increment Financing Property I.D.# 13-116-22-11-0001 13-116-22-11-0002 13-116-22-11-0003 13-116-22-12-0001 13-116-22-13-0001 13-116-22-13-0003 13-116-22-13-0004 13-116-22-14-0004 13-116-22-14-0005 13-116-22-14-0006 13-116-22-14-0007 13-11622-22-0005 13-116-22-24-0001 13-116-22-24-0002 13-116-22-33-0048 Tax Increment Financing Property IA # 14-116-22-11-0002- 14-116-22-11-0003 14-116-22-11-0004 14-116-22-11-0005 14-116-22-11-0006 14-116-22-11-0007 14-116-22-11-0008 14-116-22-11-0009 14-116-22-11-0010 14-116-22-11-0011 14-116-22-11-0012 14-116-22-11-0013 14-116-22-11-0014 14-116-22-11-0015 14-116-22-11-0016 14-116-22-11-0021 14-116-22-11-0022 14-116-22-12-0001 14-116-22-12-0003 14-116-22-12-0004 14-116-22-12-0008 14-116-2242-0009 14-116-22-12-0010 14-116-22-13-0002 14-116-22-1'-0005 14-116-22-13-0008 14-116-22-13-0011 14-116-22-13-0013 Tax Increment Financing property I.D.4 14-116-22-13-0016 14-116-22-13-0017 14-116- 22- 13-0018 14-116-22-13-0019 14-116-22-13-0021 14-116-22-13-0022 14-116-22-13-0023 14-116-22-13-0025 14-116-22-14-0001 14-116-22-14-0002 14-116-22-14-0006 14-116-22-14-0007 14-116-22-14-0008 14-116-22-14-0010 14-116-22-13-0014 14-116-22-13-0015 14-116-22-21-0002 14-116-22-21-0003 14-116-22-21-0004 14-116-22-21-0005 14-116-22-22-0001 14-116-22-22-0002 14-116-22-23-0002 14-116-22-23-0003 14-116-22-23-0004 14-116-22-24-0001 14-116-22-24-0002 ri g Tax Increment Financing Properly I.D. # 14-116-22-24-0003 14-116-22-24-0004 14-116-22-24-0005 14-116-22-24-0006 14-116-22-24-0008 14-116-22-24-0009 14-116-22-31-0001 14-116-22-31-0004 14-116-22-31-0005 14-116-22-31-0006 14-116-22-31-D007 14-116-22-31-0008 14-116-22-31-0009 14-116-22-31-0010 14-116-22-31-0011 14-116-22-31-0012 14-116-22-31-0013 14-116-22-32-0002 14-116-22-33-0001 14-116-22-33-0002 14-116-22-33-0003 14-116-22-33-0004 14-116-22-33-0005 14-116-22-33-0006 14-116-22-33-0007 14-116-22-33-0003 14-116-22-33-0009 14-116-22-33-0010 anis Tax Increment Financing Property 1.0.# 111118-22-33-0011 14-116-22-33-0012 14-116-22-33-0013 14-116-22-33-0014 14-116-22-33-0015 14-116-22-33-0016 14-116-22-34-0001 14-116-22-34-0003 14-116-22-34-0004 14-116-22-34-0008 14-116-22-34-0009 14-4161 22-34-0010 14-116-22-34-0011 14-116-22-34-0012 14-116-22-34-0013 14-116-22-34-0014 14-116-22-34-0015 14-116-22-34-0016 14-116-22-34-0017 14-116-22-34-0018 14-116-22-41-0003 14-116-22-41-0004 14-116-22-42-0003 14-116-22-43-0001 14-116-22-43-0002 14-116-22-43-0003 Tax Increment Financing .Property I.D. I 14-116-22-43-0004 14-116-22-43-0005 14-116-22-43-0007 Tax Increment Financing Proysll 1.0. 4 15-11 .6-22-11-0001 15-116-22-12-0001 15-116-22-12-0002 15-116-22-14-0.002 15-116-22-21-0001 15-116-22-21-0002 15:116-22-22-0002 15-116-22-22-0003 15-116-22-22-0004 15-116-22-22-0005 .15416-22-22-0006 15-116-22-22-0007 15-116-22-23-0001 15-116-22-24-0001 15-116-22-41-0001 15-116-22:42-0001 15-116-22-43-0001 15-116-22-44-0001 Tax Increment Financing property I.0.0 22-116-22-11-0001 22-116-22-13-0001 22-116-22-14-0001 22-116-22-24-0003 23-116-22-23-0001 23-116-22-23-0002 23-116-22-23-0003 ( Tax Increment Financing Division N 792154 Old Numbers- 14-116-22-43-0006 14-116-22-44-0001 23-116-22-11-0001 New Numbers- 14-116-22-43-0008 14-116-22-43-0009 14-116-22-44-0029 14-116-22-44-0030 14-116-22-44-0031 14-116-22-44-0032 14-116-22-44-0033 Division # 800493 Old Number- 10-116-22-42-0001 New Numbers- 10-116-22-42-0002 10-116-22-42-0003 ( IM t ( Tax Increment Financing Division 1 800404 Old Number- 14-116-22-31-0016 New Numbers- 14-116-22-31-0014 14-116-22-31-0015 14-116-22-31-0017 14-116-22-31-0018 Division # 800052 Old Number- 14-116-22-14-0009 New Numbers- 14-116-22-14-0011 14-116-22-14-0012 Tax Increment rinancing Division # 800048 14 800049 Old Numbers- 11-116-22-31-0002 11-116-22-32-0001 11-116-22-34-0002 New Numbers- 11-116-22-31-0004 11-116-22-31-0005 11-116-22-32-0002 11-116-22-32-0003 11-116-22-32-0004 11-116-22-32-0005 11-116-22-32-0006 11-116-22-33-0003 11-116-22-33-0004 11-116- 22- 34-0007 Division # 790016 Old Numbers- 11-116-22-13-0001 11-116-22-24-0001 New Numbers- 11-116-22-13-0002 11-116-22-21-0001 Tax Increment Financing Division P 792021 Old Numbers- . 11-116-22-44-0003 11-116-22-44-0004 12-116-22-33-0003 13-116-22-21-0001 New Numbers- 11-116-22-44-0007 11-116-22-44-0008 12-116-22-33-0006 13-116-22-22-0009 13-116-22-22-0010 13-116-22-22-0011 13-116-22-21-0004 13-116-22-21-0005 14-116-22-11-0027 14-116-22-11-0028 Planning Commission Minutes May II, 1981 ALL MEMBERS PRESENT. A. HARDEE'S RESTAURANT, by North Central Foods Systems Inc. Request to rezone 1.1 acres from Rural to Com-Reg-Ser for a Hardee's Restaurant. Located in the Southwest corner of US 169 & Eden Road. A public meeting. The Planner stated that Hardee's will be going before the Board of Appeals for a variance, that the proponent will be back for preliminary platting, and suggested C-Hwy zoning rather than C-Comm. District. He also introduced Mr. Geoff Martin of Howard Dahlgren Associates. Martin reviewed the site plan for the original Eden Glen PUD, access points for Hardee's, site plan for Hardee's, landscaping plan, and stated that the proponent is willing to comply with the staff's recommendations in the staff report. He also reviewed the eley ,itions of the building, signage and stated that there will be only a wall sign facing US 169 the 20 foot pylon sign will be no more than 57 sq. ft. and halfway between Eden Glen Raod and US 169/212 on Eden Road. The Planner reviewed the staff report dated May 8, 1981. Martin stated that gesco Inc. has agreed to have Eden Road and Eden Glen Road hard surfaced prior to Hardee's occupancy. Sutliff asked what the clearance under the drive-thru canopy will be. Paul Stanley, North Central Foods Systems, Inc. stated that thd clearance will be 10' 6". Sutliff asked who would pay for the signal along US 169 if one was to be put in. The Planner replied that he believed the State's standard formula was 50%to be payed for by the City, and 50% by the State Highway Department. Levitt asked what the surrounding lots will be in the Eden Glen PUD. Martin re- plied Lot 2-fast food; 3-Class 1 restaurant; 4-retail; 5, 6, & 7-offices. Retterath asked if the storm sewer plan for Lake Idlewild has been resolved. The Planner replied yes a project was underway. Torjesen asked if the culvert under Eden Road to Lake Idlewild is large enough and if sediment will gather in it from construction. Paul Blaise, Howard Dahlgren Assoc., replied yes it is large enough and it is being protected from sediment by erosion control. Torjesen asked if the proponents or staff has any preference for the zoning category. Martin replied no. The Planner suggested C-Hwy. Hallett asked if the evergreens (used on the US 169 slope) would be subject to salt spray from US 169. The Planner replied yes, but that there were types that would be more salt tolerant. Bearman asked if this is the same as the original PUD. Martin replied that there has been a minor change in Hardee's entrance, ronsolidatingtwoaccess points to one. Bearman stated that he did not feel that 12 cars would be able to be stacked up for the drive-thru, as had been represented. The Planner replied that this dimension could be checked. Planning Commission Minutes -2- May 11, 1981 Don Sorensen, 7121 Willow Creek Road asked where run-off from the storm sewer will go. The Planner replied it ultimately flows to Purgatory Creek. MOTION ITTiTien moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning from Rural to C-Hwy for a Hardee's Restaurant as per the April 28, 1981 brochure and the May 8, 1981 staff report with the following changes in the staff report: 1. Item 1, strike first three words and insert 'Developer has agreed' Retterath seconded. DISCUSSION Sutliff suggested that the placement of signs halfway between Eden Glen Road and US 169, less than 60 sq. ft. in size be followed by the rest of the uses along US 169. Levitt asked why the preliminary plat was not included in the request at this time. The Planner replied that it was not quite ready but it will be coming. Motion carried 7-0. STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: . PROJECT: APPLICANT: FEE OWNER: PROJECT LOCATION: REQUEST: Planning Commission Chris Enger, Director of Planning May 8, 1981 HARDEE'S RESTAURANT North Central Food Systems, Inc. Jesco, Inc. Within the Eden Glen PUD, in the southwest corner of Eden Road and US 169/212. Development Stage approval of PUD and zoning to Community Commercial for 1.153 acres, for purposes of a restaurant. BACKGROUND Hardee's is the first use in the recently approved Eden Glen PUD to Apply for rezoning. This request will be followed immediately with a preliminary platting request. Jesco agreed at the time of PUD approval to extend Eden Glen Road all the way south to Single Tree Lane, with the first use, in order to give access to the signalized intersection of US 169/212 at Single Tree Lane. There is no existing signal at Eden Road and U.S. 169/212. ZONING The zoning requested is C-Corn. The Planning Staff suggests either Corn- Hwy or C-Reg-Ser. zoning. These zones are more appropriate in lot size (area and dimensions) than the C-Corn. zone. SETBACKS As part of the original PUD,setbacks as outlined in the brochure will be adhered to: -50 foot U.S. 169/212 bldg. setback; 35' parking setback -35 foot building setback from Edon Road and Eden Glen Road, 17',, foot parking setbacks. The proponent will be requesting a sideyard variance on the southern bound- ary from 20 to 10' to allow a canopy for the drive-thru. The Planning Staff would recommend this. S1GNAGE 'The main pylon sign for Hardee's is proposed half way between Eden Glen Road and U.S. 169/212, adjacent to Eden Road. Although the original PUD required free-standing signs to be located on Eden Glen Road, Hardee's is using the 55 square foot sign instead of GO square feet allowed. Ing Staff Report-Hardee's page 2 If other potential users along U.S. 169/212 in this PUD would similarly reduce their sign areas, locations on their lots half way between Eden Glen Road and U.S. 169/212 would also be acceptable. Placement of the signs back from US 169/212 and of a smaller size would help prevent a very commercial sign clutter. TRAFFIC Hardee's internal site plan provides for 12 car lengths stacking for the drive-thru. Since the access to Hardee's is within 50 feet of the Eden Road/Eden Glen intersection, we were concerned about the possibility of in-left turning vehicles to Hardee's having a conflict with north bound, peak, traffic on Eden Glen Road and having less than three stacking spaces to the corner of Eden Glen Road and Eden Road. However, after analysis with the proponents' consultant, we would expect traffic to be turning left into Hardee's at a peak hour rate of one car every two minutes. They would be turning left across a peak hour, north bound, movement on Eden Glen Road of one every thirty seconds. (This analysis presupposes a stoplight at U.S. 169/212 and Eden Road). Since there is no stoplight now, most of the traffic would be south bound on Eden Glen Road, thereby reducing the conflict. The entrance at this location will be helped by the internal stacking and should work. However, it does point out the need for a left turning lane (south bound) so that additional south bound traffic does not stack, but can move around cars waiting to turn. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING The Landscaping Plan submitted will be reviewed prior to building permit issuance, however, screening of the parking should be strengthened along U.S. 169/212 and Eden Road with additional groups of evergreens. The rooftop mechanical equipment will be screened with a combination of the buildings mansard and additional redwood screening. RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Staff recommends approval of rezoning from Rural to C-Hwy subject to the following: 1. Eden Road must behard'surfaced to Eden Glen Road and Eden Glen Road hard surfaced according to City Standards south to Single Tree Lane prior to occupancy. Eden Glen Road must be constructed to provide for a left turn lane to the Hardee's site. Sidewalk along the east side of Eden Glen Road must be completed concurrent with each use east of Eden Glen Road. 2. Cash Park Fee is applicable to this project. 3. Landscaping Plan to be modified to conform with ordinances. 4. Construction of the canopy within 10' of the south lot line is subject to Board of Appeals review. Original PUD shows canopy 20' from lot line. • 114 Staff Report-Hardee's page 3 S. There should be a sidewalk link betweenliardee's internal sidewalk, across the two yard areas to connect west to the sidewalk along Eden Glen Road. In addition, since there will be a sidewalk included along Eden Road, there should be a link across the northern yard area to this sidewalk. CE:ss TO: Mayor and Council FROM: John Frane DATE: May 15, 1981 RE: MIDB's - Minnesota Supply Co. - $ 1,072,500 Minnesota Supply intends to construct a 32,200 square foot office/service facility located at 10225 Crosstown Circle with approximately 10,480 square feet to be Teased to others. The company will employ 43 persons; the property is zoned 1-2 which is correct for the intended use. Resolution #81-94 is attached for your consideration. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA Application for Industrial Development Bond Project Financing 1. APPLICANT: a. Business Name - Minnesota Supply Company b. Business Address - 3529 Raleigh Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 c. Business Form (corporation, partnership, sole proprietor- ship, etc.) - Corporation d. State of Incorporation or organization - Minnesota e. Authorized Representative - John Stromsness f. Phone - (612) 920-8620 2. NAME(S) AND ADDRESSES OF MAJOR STOCKHOLDERS OR PRINCIPALS: a. C.K. Stone - 3540 James Avneue So., Minneapolis, MN 5540$ b. R.C. 'Garwood - 19055 Ridgewood Road, Deephaven, MN 55391 c. D.K..Wallace - 6612 Lynwood Blvd., Minneapolis, MN 55423 d. J.E. Stromsness - 14835 Lloyds Drive, Minnetonka, MN 55343 e. A.L. Finstad - 11219 So. Oakdale Road, Hopkins, MN 55343 . Lo -1- -2- 3. GIVE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF BUSINESS, PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS, ETC: Mayor lines include Raymond narrow-aisle lift trucks (Raymond is the leader in the narrow-aisle industry), Chisholm-Moore hoists and chain, Conco-Tellus overhead cranes. Ridg-U-rak pallet racks, Frazier storage racks, Cargotainer wire mesh containers and Life-A-Loft maintenance and work platforms. We are involved in the engineering, systems design and sales and service of this equipment. 4. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Acquisition of land and construction of an office building and service department. a. Location and intended .use: Office building and service department 10,480 sq. ft. to be leased to other tenants. b. Present ownership of project site: Steven Hoyt on contract for deed from Prarie Square Associates Roy Terwilliger, general partner. Names and address of architect, engineer, and general contractor: Architect: Johnson & Saulon 10800 County Road 15 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 General Contractor: Hoyt Construction Co., Inc. 150 West 88th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55420 5. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST FOR: Land Building Equipment 215,000 768,500 Other: Arch. & Eng.; Legal; $ 89,000 Capitalized Iht.; Bond Discount; Loan Closing Total $ 1,072,500 6. BOND ISSUE - a. Amount of proposed bond issue - $1,072,500 b. Proposed date of sale of bond - July 1, 1981 c. Length of bond issue and proposed maturities - 25 years amortization with 15 year balloon payment. d. Proposed original purchaser of bonds - Juran & Moody, Inc. e. Name and address of suggested trustee - Not Applicable . P. Copy of any agreement between Applicant and original purchaser - See attached Agreement, dated April 22, 1981. g. Describe any interim financing sought or available - To be provided by permanent lender. h. Describe nature and amount of any permanent financing in addition to bond financing - None. 7. BUSINESS PROFILE OF APPLICANT. a. Are you located in the City of Eden Prairie? No. 4 1). Number of employees in Eden Prairie? ,i. Before this project: -0- -3- -4- 120L1 . ii. After this Project? 43 C. Approximate annual sales - 1980 - $7,622,839 d. . Length of time in business sincp 1919 in Eden Prairie -0- e. Do you have plants in other locations? If so, where? 3529 Raleigh Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55416 . t. Are you engaged in intern a tional trade? No. 8. OTHER INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT(S): a. List the name(s) and location(s) of other industrial development project(s) in which the Applicant is the .owner or a "substantial user" of the facilities or a "releated person" within the meaning of Section 103(b)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code. None b. List all cities in which the Applicant has requested industrial revenue development financing. None C. Detail the status of any request the Applicant has before any other city for industrial development revenue financing. None d. List any city in which the Applicant has been refused industrial development revenue financing. None e. List any city (and the project name) where the Applicant has acquired preliminary approval to proceed but in which final approval authorizing the financing has been denied. None -5- IAOS 1. If Applicant has been denied industrial development revenue financing in any other city as identified in (d) or (e), specify the'reason(s) for the denial and the name(s) of appropriate city officials who have knowledge of the transaction. None 9. NAMES AND ADDRESS OF: a. Underwriter (If public offering) b. Private Placement Purchaser (If private placement) Placement Agent - Juran & Moody, Inc. 114 East Seventh Street St. Paul, MN 55101 i. If lender will not commit until City has passed its preliminary resolution approving the project, submit a letter from proposed lender that it has an interest in the offering subject to appropriate City approval and approval of the Commissioner of Securities. -6- b. Bond Counsel - Dorsey, Windhorst, Hannaford, Whitney & Halladal ; 2200 First Bank Place East Minneapolis, MN 55402 c. Corporate Counsel - Allan K. Lund d. Accountant - McGladrey Hendrickson & Co. 10. 'WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR: a. Construction start - June 1, 1981 b. Construction completion - December 31, 1981 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Stromsness The undersigned Applicant understands that the approval or disapproval by the City of Eden Prairie for Industrial Development bond financing does not expressly or impliedly constitute any approval, variance, or waiver of any provision or requirement relating to any zoning, building, or other rule or ordinance of the City of Eden Prairie, or any other law applicable to the property included in this project. MINNESOTA SUPPLY COMPANY Applicant • By .AP Date -7- 1b) d. Variances required - 78- laa 11. ZONING - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE. CI' Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT • /e.t.a., 04.4.44. a. Property is zoned - b. Present zoning (1_9 (is not) correct for the intended use * focktyskri4 LA.In ct)itick.C. ,{oetety, We( tub wire, 511/. cceke, e. Zoning application received on for which is correct for the intended use. RESOLUTION NO. 8/- 9,4 RESOLUTION DETERMINING TO PROCEED WITH A PROJECT AND ITS FINANCING UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT ; REFERRING THE PROPOSAL TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES FOR APPROVAL ; AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED b y the Cit y Council of the Cit y of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the Municipalit y ), as follows: SECTION 1 Recitals and Findin g s 1.1. This Council has received a proposal that the Municipalit y finance a portion or all of the cost of a proposed project under Minnesota Statute's, Chapter 474 (the Act), consistin g of the ac q uisition of land and the construction thereon of an office buildin g and service department (the Project) b y Minnesota Suppl y Compan y , a Minnesota corporation (the Borrower). 1.2. At a public hearin g , dul y noticed and held on , 1981, in accordance with the Act, on the po prosal to undertake and finance the Project, all parties who appeared at the hearin g were g iven an opportunit y to express their views with respect to the proposal to undertake and finance the Project. Based on the public hearin g and such other facts and circumstances as this Council deems relevant, this Council hereb y finds, determines and declares as follows: (a) The welfare of the State of Minnesota re q uires active promotion, attraction, encoura g ement and development of economicall y sound industr y and commerce throug h g overnmental acts to prevent, so far as possible, emer g ence of bli g hted lands and areas of chronic unemplo yment, and the State of Minnesota has encoura g ed local g overnment units to act to prevent such economic deterioration. (b) The Project would further the g eneral purposes contemplated and described in Section 474.01 of the Act. (c) The existence of the Project would add to the tax base of the Municipalit y , Hennepin Count y and School District in which the Project is located and would provide increased opportunities for emplo yment for residents of the Municipalit y and surroundin g area. -3- tao9 (d) This Council has been advised by representatives of the Borrower and by Juran 6' Moody, Inc., investment bankers and dealers in municipal bonds, that conventional, commercial financing to pay the cost of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be significantly reduced, but that with the aid of municipal borrowing, and its resulting lower borrowing cost, the Project is economically more feasible. (e) This Council has also been advised by Juran & Moody, Inc. that on the basis of their discussions with potential buyers of tax-exempt bonds, revenue bonds of the Municipality (which may be in the form of a commercial development revenue note or notes) could be issued and sold upon favorable rates and terms to finance the Project. (f) The Municipality is authorized by the Act to issue its revenue bonds to finance capital projects consisting of properties used and useful in connection with a revenue producing enterprise, such as that of the Borrower, and the issuance of such bonds by the Municipality would be a substantial inducement to the Borrower to acquire and construct the Project. SECTION 2 Determination to Proceed with the Project and its Financing 2.1. On the basis of the information given the Municipality to date, it appears that it would be in the best interests of the Municipality to issue its revenue bonds under the provisions of the Act to finance the Project in an estimated total amount of $1,072,500. 2.2. It is hereby determined to proceed with the Project and its financing and this Council hereby declares its present intent to have the Municipality issue its revenue bonds under the Act to finance the Project. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the adoption of this resolution shall not be deemed to establish a legal obligation on the part of the Municipality or its City Council to issue or to cause the issuance of such revenue bonds. All details of such F evenue bond issue and the provisions for payment thereof shall be subject to final approval of the Project by the Minnesota Commissioner of Securities and may be subject to such further conditions as the Municipality may specify. The revenue bonds, if -4- /A10 issued, shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the Municipality, except the Project, and each bond, when, as and if issued, shall recite in substance that the bond, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenues received from the Project and property pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the Municipality within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. 2.3. The Application to the Commissioner of Seturities, with attachments, is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute said documents in behalf of the Municipality. 2.4. In accordance with Section 474.10, Subdivision 7a of the Act, the Mayor, City Manager and Finance Director/Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to cause the Application to be submitted to the Commissioner of Securities for approval of the Project. The Mayor, City Manager, Finance Director/Clerk, City Attorney and other officers, employees and agents of the Municipality are hereby authorized and directed to provide the Commissioner with any preliminary information the Commissioner may need for this purpose, and the City Attorney is authorized to initiate and assist in the preparation of such documents as may be appropriate to the Project, if it is approved by the Commissioner. SECTION 3 General 3.1. If the bonds are issued and sold, the Municipality will enter into a lease, sale or loan agreement or similar agreement satisfying the requirements of the Act (the Revenue Agreement) with the Borrower. The lease rentals, installment sale payments, loan payments or other amounts payable by the Borrower to the Municipality under the Revenue Agreement shall be sufficient to pay the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, on the bonds as and when the same shall become due and payable. 3.2. The adoption of this resolution does not constitute a guarantee or a firm commitment that the Municipality will issue the bonds as requested by the Borrower. The Municipality retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation, and accordingly not issue the bonds, should the Municipality at any time prior to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the -5- a I 1 best interest of the Municipality not to issue the bonds or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the structuring of the financing or as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction. 3.3. All commitments of the Municipality expressed herein are subject to the condition that within twelve months from the date of adoption of this resolution the Municipality and the Borrower shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the -Revenue Agreement, the bonds and of the other instruments and proceedings relating to the bonds,and their issuance and sale. 3.4. If the events set forth herein do not take place within the time set forth above or any extension thereof and the bonds are not sold within such time:, this resolution shall expire and be of no further force and effect. The Borrower has agreed and it is tereby. determined that any and all direct and indirect costs incurred by the Municipality in connection with this Project, whether or not the Project is carried to completion, and whether or not approved by the Commissioner of Securities, and whether or not the Municipality by resolution authorizes the issuance of the bonds, will be paid by the Borrower upon request. 3.5. The Municipality will require the Borrower, if the bonds are issued and sold, to provide the information necessary to comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision 8. Adopted this day of , 1981.. Mayor Attest: Finance Director/Clerk (SEAL) The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. -7- TO: FROM: DATE: May 15, 1981 RE: MIDB's - Volunteers of America Project - $850,000 The Volunteers of America operate 16 health care facilities throughout the United States. They intend to construct a 9300 square foot headquarters for their operations in the Lake Ridge Office Park. The applicant will employ 20 persons; the property is zoned office which is correct for the intended use. Resolution #81-95 is attached for your cOnsideration. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA Application for Industrial Development Bond Project Financing 1. APPLICANT: a. Business Name - Volunteers of America Care Facilities b. Business Address - 6550 York Avenue So. Minneapolis, MN 55435 c. Business Form (corporation, partnership, sole proprietor- ship, etc.) - Not-For-Profit Corporation d. State of Incorporation organization - Minnesota e. Authorized Representative • Bruce Farrington Assistant Secretary/Treasurer f. Phone - (612)920-4041 2. NAME(S) AND ADDRESSES OF MAJOR STOCKHOLDERS OR PRINCIPALS: See Exhibit C for Members of Board of Directors who are also the Members of Volunteers of America Care Facilities. This is a membership corporation and therefore, does not have any stock or stockholders. " a. b. C . 3. GIVE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF BUSINESS, PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS, ETC: Volunteers of America Care Facilities owns and operates or manages geriatric nursing homes and homes for the developmentally disabled in five states. 4. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT a. Location and intended use: Location: Lake Ridge Office Park, Bryant Lake Center, Eden Prairie, Minnesota. Intended use: Corporate headquarters offices b. Present ownership of project site: Mr. Wallace H. Hustad c. Names and address of architect, engineer, and general contractor: Architect: Waters, Cluts & O'Brien,. 5265 Edina Industrial Blvd., Edina, MN 55435 • Engineer: Sathre7Berquist, Inc., 935 E. Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata, MN 55391 General Contractor: Ryan Development, Inc., P.O. Box 598, Grand Rapic: MN 55744 5. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST FOR: Land $ 25.500 Building $680,000 Equipment $ 87 000 Other $ 59,500 Total $ 852,000 gal 6. BOND ISSUE - a. Amount of proposed bond issue - $850,000 • b. Proposed date of sale of bond - October 1981 C. Length of bond issue and proposed maturities - 15 years, based upon 30 year amortization schedule. d. Proposed original purchaser of bonds - First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Grand Rapids e. Name and address of suggested trustee - Not applicable f. Copy of any agreement between Applicant and original purchaser - Not applicable Describe any interim financing sought or available - Turnkey financing arrangement - no interim financing requested. h. Describe nature and amount of any permanent financing in addition to bond financing - No permanent financing will be used for the down payment. 7. BUSINESS PROFILE - a. Are you located in the City of Eden Prairie? No b. Number of employees in Eden Prairie? i. Before this project: None g. ii. After this project? 20 employees c. Approximate annual sales - $25,000,000 d. Length of time in business Since September 1970 in Eden Prairie None e. Do you have plants in other locations? If so, where? See Exhibit D for list of nursing home locations. f. Are you engaged in international trade? No • B. OTHER INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT(S):. a. List the name(s) and location(s) of other industrial development project(s) in which the Applicant is the owner or a "substantial user" of the facilities or. a "releated person" within the meaning of Section 103(b) (6) of the Internal Revenue Code. Sleepy Eye Care Center Sleepy Eye, Minnesota The Company acquired this nursing home subject to the remaining obligation under an industrial development revenue bond. Bethesda Care Center Fremont, Ohio The Company guaranteed up to $235,000 of the principal and interest in connection with a first mortgage hospital facilities revenue bond for this nursing home. 1217 b. List all cities in which the Applicant has requested industrial revenue development financing. Montrose, Colorado (nursing home revenue bonds for the acquisition of a nursing home) Lake City, Florida (health care facilities revenue bond for the expansion of a nursing home) c. Detail the status of any request the Applicant has before any other city for industrial development revenue financing. Montrose, Colorado Final approval to be obtained in May. Lake City, Florida Validation process initiated in April. d. List any city in which the Applicant has been refused industrial development revenue financing. None e. List any city (and the project name) where the Applicant has acquired preliminary approval to proceed but in which final approval authorizing the financing has been denied. None f. If Applicant has been denied industrial development revenue financing in any other city as identified . in (d) or (e), specify the reason(s) for the denial and the name(s) of appropriate city officials who have knowledge of the transaction. N/A 9. NAMES AND ADDRESS OF: a. Underwriter (If public offering) b. Private Placement Purchaser (If private placement) First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Grand Rapids . i. If lender will not commit until City has passed its preliminary resolution approving the project, submit a letter from proposed • lender that it has an interest in the offering subject to appropriate City approval and approval of the Commissioner of Securities. 31. ZONING - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT a. Property is zoned - IG6 b. present zoning is not) correct for the intended use. c. Zoning application received on for which is correct for the intended use. d. Variances required -. City Planner -8- 1222- • J. Clint Cheveallier P.O. Box 37 918 North Boulevard Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70821 Jack Dignum 1865 Larimer Street Denver, Colorado 80202 EXHIBIT C VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA CARE FACILITIES 1981 Board of Directors Robert E. Nolte President 6550 York Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55435 Paul H. Nolte Vice President 1501 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90017 Robert E. Nolte, Jr. Vice President 6550 York Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55435 Ray C. Tremont Secretary/Treasurer 3939 North Causeway Boulevard Metairie, Louisiana 70002 David W. Bordenkircher 1340 Clay Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45210 After all persons who wished to do so had stated their views on the proposal, the Mayor declared the hearing to be closed. After some discussion, Councilmember introduced the following resolution and (after it had been read in full) (after the reading of the resolution was dispensed with by unanimous consent) moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. V - fC RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE AUTHORIZA- TION AND ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS OF THE CITY UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES/ CHAPTER 474, FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANC- ING A PROJECT THEREUNDER; AND AUTHORIZ- ING AN APPLICATION BY THE CITY TO THE MINNESOTA COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES AND REAL ESTATE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the Council) of the City of Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The Legislature of the State of Minnesota in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended (the Act), has found and declared that the welfare of the State requires active promotion, attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce through governmental acts to prevent, so far as possible, emergence of blighted lands and areas of chronic unemployment; has authorized municipalities to issue revenue bonds to finance, in whole or in part, the cost of the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement and betterment of projects, including any properties, real or personal, used or useful in connection with a revenue producing enterprise engaged in any business; and has authorized municipalities to enter into "revenue agreements", as defined in the Act, with any person, firm, or public or private corporation or federal or state governmental subdivision or agency (the Contracting Party) providing for the payment by the Contracting Party of amounts sufficient to provide for the prompt payment of principal of and interest on the revenue bonds. -3- 1124 1.02. It has been proposed that the, city issue its revenue bonds, pursuant to the authority granted b y the Act, in an aggregate principal amount not to exc e e d $850,000, or such lesser amount as may be necessary, t o finance costs of acquisition of land within the City a n d construction and equipping thereon of one or more buildings (the Project) to be owned and operated by Volunteers of America Care Facilii.ies, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the Corporation), to be used a s corporate headquarters for the Corporation; and to ma k e the proceeds of such sale available to the Corporation. The Corporation will agree to pay the City amounts sufficient to pay promptly the principal of and inter e s t on the revenue bonds, and will agree to cause the Project to be completed. The Project is presently estimated to cost approximately $850,000. 1.03. The City has been advised that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital c o s t of the Project is available only on a limited basis a n d a t such high costs of borrowing that the scope of the Pr o j e c t or the economic feasibility of operating the Project w o u l d be significantly reduced, but that with the aid of municipal financing, and its resulting low borrowing .costs, the Project can be constructed as designed and i t s operation is economically more feasible. Section 2. Public Hearing. 2.01. As required by Section 474.01, Subdivision 7b, of the Act, this Council, pursuant to a motion pas s e d on May 5 , 1981, called and held a public hearing on the proposal to undertake and finance the Project. No t i c e of the time and place of the hearing, and stating th e general nature of the Project and an estimate of the principal amount of bonds to be issued to finance th e Project, was published at least once not less than f i f t e e n (15) days nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the d a t e fixed for the hearing, in the official newspaper of t h e City and a newspaper of general circulation of the C i t y . A draft copy of the proposed application to the Minn e s o t a Commissioner of Securities and Real Estate, together w i t h all attachments and exhibits thereto, was available f o r public inspection following the publication of such n o t i c e at the place and times set forth in the notice. 2.02. All parties who appeared at the public hearing were given an opportunity to express their vi e w s with respect to the proposal to undertake and finance t h e Project. This Council has heard and considered the v i e w s -4- I 225 expressed at the public hearing and the information submitted to the City by the Corporation. Section 3. Approvals and Authorizations. 3.01. On the basis of information given the City to date, and the views expressed at the public hearing, it is found and determined that the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 474.01 of the Act, and that it would be in the best interest of the City to issue its industrial development revenue bonds under the provisions of the Act to finance costs of the Project in an amount not to exceed $850,000 (the Bonds). 3.02. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City and the issuance of the Bonds for such purpose approved. The Bonds shall not be issued until the Project has been approved by the Commissioner of Securities and Real Estate, as provided by the Act, and until the City and the Corporation have agreed upon the details of the Bonds and provisions for their payment. 3.03. If the Bonds are issued and sold, the City will enter into a lease, mortgage, direct or installment sale contract, loan agreement, take or pay or similar agreement, secured or unsecured, satisfying the requirements of the Act (the Revenue Agreement) with the Corporation. The amounts payable by the Corporation to the City under the Revenue Agreement will be sufficient to pay the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, on the Bonds as and when the same shall become due and payable. 3.04. The Corporation has agreed to pay directly or through the City any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the Project whether or not the Project is approved by the Commissioner of Securities and Real Estate; whether or not the Project is carried to completion; and whether or not the Bonds or Revenue Agreement and all other operative instruments are executed. 3.05. The adoption of this resolution does not constitute a guarantee or a firm commitment that the City will issue the Bonds as requested by the Corporation. The City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and accordingly not issue the Bonds should the City at any time prior to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest of the City not to issue the Bonds or should the City, Corporation and any other parties to the transaction be unable to reach -5- I 2.1C. agreement as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction. 3.06. In accordance with the Act, the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Minnesota Commissioner of Securities and Real Estate for her approval of the - Project. The Mayor, City Clerk, City Attorney and other officers, employees and agents of the City, in conjunction with Dorsey, Windhorst, Hannaford, Whitney & Halladay, Bond Counsel to the City, are hereby authorized to provide the Commissioner with any preliminary information she may need for this purpose, and the City Attorney is authorized to initiate and assist in the preparation of such documents as may be appropriate to the Project. 3.07. The City will cause the Corporation to comply with all of the provisions of the Act, including Section 474.01, Subdivision 8, thereof, in the issuance of the Bonds and the financing of the Project. 3.08. All commitments of the City expressed herein are subject to the condition that within twelve months of the date of adoption of this resolution the City and the Corporation shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the Revenue Agreement, the Bonds and of the other instruments and proceedings relating to the Bonds and their issuance and sale. If the events set forth herein do not take place within the time set forth above, or any extension thereof, and the Bonds are not sold within such time, this resolution shall expire and be of no further effect. Section 4. Special Obligations. In all events, it is understood, however, that the Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City except the Project, if it becomes the property of the City, and from the revenues received from the Project and property pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the City. Section 5. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon its final adoption. PASSED AND FINALLY ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,. this 2nd day of June, 1981. -6- 2.2-1 and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and finally adopted. -7- The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Councilmember and, upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: • June 2, 1981 STA( OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows: 6617 6618 6619 6620 6621 6622 6623 6624 6625 6626 6627 6628 6629 6630 6631 6632 66W 66A 6635 6636 6637 6638 6639 6640 6641 6642 6643 6644 6645 6646 6647 6648 6649 6650 6651 6652 6653 6654 6655 6656 6657 665, 6660 6661 6662 6663 STEVEN P. GEIGER CHASKA YAMAHA PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTORS, INC. GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. MINNESOTA WINE MERCHANTS TWIN CITY WINE CO. MINNESOTA DISTILLERS, INC. OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO MR. & MRS. HOWARD HASTINGS VOID OUT CHECK INSTY PRINTS FEDERAL RESERVE BANK COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE AETNA LIFE INSURANCE & ANNUITY UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS PERA SUBURBAN RATIONAL BANK MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF P/S COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PETTY CASH HOPKINS POSTMASTER MINNESOTA UC FUND VIRGIL A. & LAURA MAE SEIFERT MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK SANDRA WERTS INSTY-PRINTS JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. TWIN CITY WINE CO. ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. MENARDS DONALDSONS RICHARD W. ANDERSON, INC. HOPKINS POSTMASTER MENARDS CURTIS MANLEY BERGQUIST MICHAEL BOSACKER LANCE BRACE JAMES CLARK SPENCER CONRAD WALLACE CONRAD Service-Police Dept. Equipment parts-Police Dept. Service-Valley View Road Liquor Liquor Liquor Wine Wine Liquor Liquor Wine Temporary easement-Engineering Dept. Printing-Rec Dept. Payroll Payroll Payroll Payroll Payroll Payroll Motor vehicle registration April 1981 Sales Tax April 1981 Fuel tax Postage Postage-Summer brochure Payroll Red Rock Park Earnest money Conference-Summer Playground Change fund-Park & Recreation Dept. Printing-Senior Citizens Liquor Liquor Wine Liquor Wine Liquor Lumber-Park Dept. Furniture-Manager Refund-Engineering Dept. Postage Lumber-Park Dept. Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman $ 32.07 58,422.7. 826.8 1,758.8 , 648.4 85.3 149.3" 1,256.4 2,124.4: 132.8. 100.C, 78.8 15,078.6 5,226.7; 165.0 52.9 10,182.2 250.0 13.7 2,952.7: 253.3 9.E 438. 840.0 500.2. 48.0 35.2.: 7.2, 1,189.E: 106.6 1,148.E 1,081.2. 810.4 457.E 1,500.2. , 2,000.c , 656.2. 228.0: i 438.0 1 652.0 1 612.2. 1 300.0L 1 1229 Pagg two Jur( ?, 1981 6664 6665 6666 6667 6668 6669 6670 6671 6672 6673 6674 6675 6676 6677 6678 6679 6680 6681 6682 6683 6684 663 666 6687 6688 6689 6690 6691 6692 6693 6694 6695 6696 6697 6698 6699 6700 6701 6702 6703 6704 6705 6706 6707 6708 6709 67r 671-. 6712 6713 6714 6715 PATRICK DADY LARRY DOIG MICHAEL FARRELL JOHN HACKING FRED HAFFNER JOHN J. HOBBS JOHN THOMAS HOBBS JR. GENE A. JACOBSON WALTER JAMES DUANE LEWIS JOHNSON RONALD O. JOHNSON MARVIN A. LAHTI M.E. LANE JR. BRADLEY EARL LARSON ROBERT PAUL LISTIAK LOWELL D. LUND JAMES GEE MATSON GARY LEE MEYER JOHN RAYMOND MITCHELL RAY IRWIN MITCHELL MARILYN F. MITCHELL PATRICK JOSEPH MONAHAN THOMAS HAMILTON MONTGOMERY CURTIS REED OBERLANDER DAVID LEE PENDERGRASS DOUGLAS LEE PLEHAL JERALD F. PRODOEHL JOHN DAVID RIEGERT STANLEY ADOLPH RIEGERT JOHN DAVID ROCHFORD NORBERT HENRY ROGERS MICHAEL JOHN ROGERS TIMOTHY PAUL RUST CHARLES SCHAITBERGER JOHN T. SCHEIDERICH HARVEY H. SCHMIDT GERALD M. SCHWANKL JOHN,J. SKRANKA VERNON T. STEPPE BURTON LEE SUTTON MARC LEWIS THIELMAN RICHARD W. TURNER STEPHEN J. WHITE DUANE JAMES CABLE STEVEN W. HAHNFELDT EUGENE R. SPANDE BERNARD F. NEUMANN MARTIN L. PAULSEN A & H WELDING & MFG. CO .. DENNIS ALBRECHT STUART ALEXANDER AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK & TRUST Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Secretary-Fire Dept. Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Fireman Supplies-Water Dept. Softball official Mileage CO. Service 342.c 504.c 236.0 622.0 646.0 312.c 788.c 1,034.c 362.0 406.0 610.c 516.0 574.0 272.c 618.c 1,050.0 590.c 594.C. 460.0 1,654.c 350.0 146.0 540.c 794.0 650.c 908.0 708.c 402.c 782.c 436.0 740.c 450.c - 284.c 734.c 354.c 258.0 1,090.0 648.0 576.c . 774.0 696.c 272.c 488.c 286.c 202.1 406.c 396.c 136.0 12.E - 66.c - 50.7 25.0 12.0 Pagg three Junk •, 1981 Signs-Street Dept. Supplies-Forestry Dept. Test speedometers Refund-Rec Dept. Service-Schooner Blvd.-W 78th St. to Valley View Rd., Dell Road, Anderson Lakes Parkway, Lake Eden Park Title Searchs Softhall official Keys-Public Safety April 1981 Service Service-Rymarland Camp, TH 101 Service-Happenings Service-Fire Dept. Desk-Liquor Store #2, Chairs-Police Dept. Supplies-Liquor Store Guitar Instructor Chemicals-Park Dept. Service-Industrial Blvd. Safe-Liquor Store #2 Bags-Liquor Store Service Service-Public Works Equipment repair & parts Equipment repair & parts Supplies-Community Services Equipment repair-Fire Dept. Desk signs-Police Dept. Supplies-Engineering Dept. Remove tree stumps-Park Dept. Refund-Rec Dept. Roll-up Door-Liquor Store # 2 Office supplies Rope-Rec Dept. Service-Police Dept. Plaques Fuel-Street Dept. Refund-Rec Dept. Equipment repair & parts Sulfate-Water Dept. Subscription-Fire Dept. Dues-Fire Dept. Supervisor-Adaptive Recreation Mobile radidtPublic Safety Calligraphy instructor Valve-Street Dept. Expenses Refund-Rec Dept. Replace Windshield-Police Dept. Refund rent deposit Equipment repair & parts Maintenance agreement-Water Dept. 1P3 6716 EARL F. ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES 6717 ARTEKA INCORPORATED 6718 AUTOTRAAC 6719 ANDY BASTY 6720 B R W 6721 BEST & FLANAGAN 6722 DENIS BILLMYER 6723 BLOOMINGTON LOCKSMITH COMPANY 6724 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 6725 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING 6726 MARY BETH BUCKMAN 6727 ROBERT J. BURESH 6728 BUSINESS FURNITURE, INC. 6729 BUTCH'S BAR SUPPLY 6730 CAROLYN CASSOLA 6731 CASTLE CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC. 6732 CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN TRANS. 6733 CERTIFIED SERVICES-NOSIER 6734 CHARLTON-MCCLAY INC. 6744 CHEMLAWN 671 CHEMSCAPE 6737 CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SERVICE 6738 CLUTCH & U-JOINT 6739 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. 6740 CREATIVE SIGNS 6741 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CO. 6742 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION 6743 DESIGN STUMP REMOVAL 6744 MOLLY DONOVAN 6745 DOOR SYSTEMS, INC. 6746 DORHOLT PRINTING 6747 EATON'S 6748 EDEN PRAIRIE CLEANERS 6749 EDEN PRAIRIE ENGRAVERS 6750 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT 6751 DAVID EKREM 6752 EMPIRE-CROWN AUTO, INC. 6753 FEED-RITE CONTROLS, INC. 6754 FIRE CHIEF MAGAZINE 6755 FIRE INSTRUCTOR'S ASSN. OF MINN. 6756 LIZ FORMIC() 6757 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 6758 KARIN GORI 6759 R.L. GOULD & CO., INC. 67(' JACK HACKING 676. TRICIA HANSON 6762 HARMON GLASS 6763 HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE 6764 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL CENTERS 6765 HONEYWELL INC 98.6 12.4 100.0 1.5 6,599.4 140.0, 110.0 38.7_ 545.0 184.3 1110.0 533.4 118.7. 850.C' 311.4' 50.0 1,489.0 ! 150.0 303.2 90.0 304.7 8,6' 15.2, 149.0: 3.6 343.0 3,919,C 325. 51.7 3.1 2,443.0 ' 2,902.1 ! 15.1 55.1 ' 126.0 14,980.0 108.1 110." 40.;- 2.5 ; 131.0 218.7 1 340.4H 3,989.1 i Page four Jun f 's 1 981 6766 6767 6768 6769 6770 6771 6772 6773 6774 6775 6776 6777 6778 6779 6780 6781 6782 6783 6784 6785 6786 6787 67k 676 6790 6791 6792 6793 6794 6795 6796 6797 6798 6799 6800 6801 6802 6803 6804 6805 6806 6807 6808 6809 6810 6811 6812 68( 6814 6815 6816 16817 HUB OFFICE PRODUCTS CO. IBM GENE A. JACOBSON WALTER D. JOHNSON J J. KASID TOM KEEFE NANCY KODADEK KEVIN M. KOHLS KOKESH ATHLETIC & GOLF SUPPLY JOYCE KRISCO J. KRIS KRYSTOFIAK LAYNE MINNESOTA COMPANY LOGIS MAGNEY CONSTRUCTION CO. ROBERT N. MARTZ CAROLINE MCNUTTY MCQUIRE PLUMBING MEREDITH CONST. CO . METRO PRINTING INC. METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL MIDLAND INSURANCE CO. MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE CO. MINNESOTA CASH REGISTER MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK MINNESOTA TORO MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC MY CHEESE SHOP NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC. NS P NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE BRENDEN O'DONNELL GARY OTTERDAHL PENNY SUPERMARKET #25 RALPH PEREZ REBECCA PLOWMAN PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN PREST COMPANY CHARLES PUFAHL DEANNE REIMS JEANNE REUTER RYAN RUBBER STAMPS ST. PAUL POLICE PISTOL CLUB ST. REGIS PAPER CO. SALLY DISTRIBUTORS SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. KATHY SCHUMACHER RN SENIOR HEALTH SERVICES BRIAN SIEVERTSON SPORTSWORLD SPRAYCO INC. STATE TREASURER Supplies-Police Dept. Office Supplies-Public Safety Fuel for squad car Expenses Softball official Softball official Program coordinator-Adaptive Recreation Softball official Bases,Plates-Rec Dept. Instructor-Calligraphy classes Mileage Service-Edenvale Golf Course Well April 1981 Service Service-Eden Prairie Community Center Expenses Refund-Rec Dept. Refund-Gas fitters license Building construction-Liquor Store # 2 Happenings newsletter May 1981 Sewer Charge Insurance Deductable Service Employment ad-Human Services Cash registers-Liquor Store # 2 Employment ad-Senior Citizens Tire-Park Dept. Service Service Books-Bldg. Dept., Subscription-Fire Dept. Service Service Refund-Rec Dept. Softball official Supplies-City Hall Softball official Tennis instructor Supplies-Park Dept. Paint-Water Dept. Softball official Refund-Rec Dept. Supervisor-Adaptive Recreation Stamps-Planning & Manager Ammunition-Police Dept. Supplies-Public Works Supplies-Rec Dept. Service-Chatham Woods Tests-Public Safety Fee-Senior Citizens Softball official Softball equipment-Rec Dept. Equipment repair & parts Fee-Water Dept.' 36.0: 10.0: 80.3:. 66.0: 219.8. 27.3i 400.0:- 2,141.4. 51,872.6: 159.8 10.8. 82.0;: 40,314.E 1,000.0: 1,181.7: 302.4: 11,133.C: 35.0: 68.71 7,812.2 175.5 8.0 44.c: 56.2_ 187.C: 1,131.0:. 82.4:, 48.9 110.C:, 115.0 108.0.; 19.5 168.7 1 19.5 9,361.5 75.0:; 50.0 66.0 1,014.1: 62.8 15.0. TOTAL Pa % rive Jun 2, 1981 6818 6819 6820 6821 6822 6823 6824 6825 6826 6827 6828 6829 6830 6831 6832 6833 0834 6835 6836 6837 6838 STATE TREASURER TARGET STORES, INC. JOANNE TERRIQUEZ CARRIE TIETZ TRANSPORT CLEARINGS TRUCK OUTFITTERS, INC. TRUE VALUE BUILDING CENTER TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO. UNIFORMS UNLIMITED VAN WATERS & ROGERS BECK! WARNER WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY PAUL M. WELIN SANDRA F. WERTS LYNN WIEDEWITSCH JO WIGEN ZEP MANUFACTURING CO. ZIEGLER INC. ROBERT LAMBERT WARD DAHLBERG METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL RICHARD J. BREN RICHARD J. BREN & MARTHA BREN Service Supplies-Rec Dept. Supplies-Rec Dept. Minutes-Park & Recreation meetings Freight charges Equipment Supplies-Anjmal Control Oxygen-Water Dept. Uniforms Chlorine & stlicofluoride-Water Dept Mileage Copper tubing-Water Dept. Softball official Expenses & Mileage Baton & Dance Instructor Refund-Rec Dept. Chemicals-Street Dept. Bulb-Street Dept. Expenses Expenses April 1981 SAC charges Easement-Engineering Dept. Easement-Engineering Dept. 570.0 97.1 21.E 57.0 21.E 138.0 24.7 12. 1,954.- 1,520.0 39.c 259.E 88.r 270.- 178.- 35.- 153.- 113— 42,916.: 32,188-: 26,964.' John D. Frane, City—Crerk SEAL I AN CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION N0.81-108 A RESOLUTION RESTABLISHING A POLICY OF A SIX MONTH TIME LIMIT BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND READINGS OF ORDINANCES REZONING PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY WHEREAS, presently there is no time limit between a first and second reading of an ordinance rezoning properties within the City of Eden Prairie, ar4 WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission supports and recommends that the City Council adopt a time limit policy, and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that a delay in excess of six months between the first and second feedings can hinder the City's orderly review process and effect the review process of other development applications. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: that all zoning applications submitted from thie day on shall be subject to a six month time limit between first and second readings of the ordinance. If the second reading is not requested by the proponent within six months, the City Council may initiate action on the second reading. ADOPTED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie this day of Wolfgang 1C—PiniiT;—MiYor 1981. ATTEST: The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission considered this request at their May 4 meeting and recommended the Council approve this request. BL:md Mayor and City Council Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services/at.° DATE: May 28, 1981 SUBJECT: Donation and Request from the Lions Club 'Earlier this year, the Lions Club contacted the Community Services Department to request ideas for a possible funding project for the Lions Club. The Director of Community Services and the Park Planner have met with the Lions Club on several occasions to discuss a number of ideas for funding projects. At their April 20 meeting, the Lions Club unanimously approved a $15 4 00 funding project for the development of a playground area adjacent to Round Lake beach beach and a fishing pier on Round Lake. The Lions Club also reminded City staff that they provided funding for the existing pyramidal shaped. park shelter adjacent to the beach. The Lions Club indicated that they would like to adopt the Round Like beach area as a Club improvement project. They would anticipate future funding projects in this area and as a part of this commitment would like the City to name the beach "Lions Beach" and note that name with a sign in an appropriate location. City staff supports the Lions Club request for naming the beach "Lions Beach" and would recommend the City Council approve this request. Furthermore, staff would recommend that the sign designating the beach would be located between the two park shelters, on either side of the beach, adjacent to the parking lot serving the beach. Staff feels there is need for an information bulletin board for this park and feels that the Lions Beach sign could be incorporated into this bulletin board struture. MEMORANDUM TO: Thru: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Carl Jullie, City Manager Bob Lambert, Director of Community Service May 28, 1981 Athletic Field Improvement Program for Round Lake Park Attached is a copy of the May 14, 1981 memo to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, as well as Commission action at the May 18 meeting regarding Athletic Field Improvement at Round Lake Park. Also, attached is information received for lighting two softball fields. One set of specifications would meet criteria for slowpitch recreational combination with football; (the cost for lighting two softball fields is $44,000) the other is for lighting two slowpitch softball fields for tournament standards at a cost of $97,872. Staff would point out that there is no existing need for lighting softball fields for tournament use; however, staff would project such a need within five to ten years. There is an existing need for lighting an area for the fall football program. City staff briefly dismissed the possibility of the EP Football Association using the Middle School Football field after the new football field is constructed in Round Lake Park. However, school district staff could not make commitment for that use at this point as they see future school district needs for those fields in the evening at the same time of the year. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission felt that it was important to invest in the proper lighting that will serve all the future needs of softball and football. The Commission recommended that the City Council approve irrigating the southern portion of Round Lake Park during 1981, lighting of one softball field in 1982 and a second softball field in 1983. Estimated costs for irrigating would be approximately $55,000 with an extimated cost of $50,000 per field for lighting. City staff requests approval from the City Council as per the Parks, Recreation and Nitrual Resources Commission recommendation. BL:md MENI3RANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: May 14, 1981 SUBJECT: Athletic Field Improvement Program for Round Lake Park At the May 4 meeting of the ParLs, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, the Commission took the following action: MOTION: Jessen moved to recommend investigating ways to install irrigation and light systems to the two existing northern fields at Round Lake Park (or other fields can be suggested if more feasible) to whatever extent they may require. Further recommend developing a plan to have an incremental method of accomplishing said improvements. VanMeter seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. At that same meeting, there was a lengthy discussion regarding lighting of softball fields for multi-use by softball and football players. Several points seemed to be agreed upon by the majority of the Commission members. 1. As softball fields are lighted they should be lighted to tournament standards. 2. Fields that could share lighting poles should be in the first phase of this project. 3. With the amount of use that lighting would encourage on these fields, irrigating the fields should be a priority use and should probably occur prior to lighting the fields. 4. The Eden Prairie Football Association needs a lighted field space as soon as possible. S. There is a possibility that when the new football field is completed at the new high school community and City programs should have more access to the old football field at the Middle School site. However, no one will really know how much time will be available for community and City programs until the later part of 1982. The Five Year Capital Improvement Program recently approved has $50,000 for lights in 1981 and $56,000 for irrigation in 1983, and well as $15,000 for fence for ballfields in 1984. -2 City staff would recommend the following improvement program: 1. Provide irrigation for the southern four fields in 1981 • after the softball season. ($56,000 extimate) 2. Request the school to make a decision on the amount of community and City use that would be available for the Middle School Football Field by the later part of the summer of 1982. If the school is able to schedule the City and Eden Prairie Football Association in on that field on a regular basis, staff would recommend delaying any lighting of any fields until need would be shown by softball use. 3. If the school can't guarantee the City or Eden Prairie Football Association a satisfactory amount of use on a regular basis, staff would then reommend lighting one field in 1982 and an additional field in 1983. Staff would recommend lighting the two existing fields with this lighting program as these are the only two fields that could share light Standards and could possibly provide sufficient room for Eden Prairie Football Association use. Estimated cost for lighting each field is approximatley $50,000. If we woudl proceed with \ the program we would have to review the CIP to determine what items should be deleted to allow this funding BL:md H2. Minutes - Parke, Recreation I liatural Resources Commission unapproved -4— May 18, 1981 B. Reports of Staff 1. Development Proposal, Willow Creek -above 2.- Community Education Minutes 4/30/81 Information item. Friederichs asked if a draft of the new policy being written which pertains to costs of services the City will be expected to pay (supervision, custodial, etc.). Lmmbert will furnish a copy of the entire policy draft after the next school board meeting. 3. Earl & Helen More Rome Acquisition • MOTION: Kingrey moved to support Staff recommendations on terms and negotiations of the More home. Schwartz seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. 46 'Council Report 5/5/81 -Approved new hockey rink at Round Lake Park -.Approved acquisition of the More house ..Aocepted Fishing Resources Committee report • -Continued until the next meeting the issue of acceptance of Outlet A and B at Hidden Ponds VI. OLD BUSINESS A. Athletic Field Improvement Program for Round Lake Park Lambert referred to Staff memo of May 14, 1981, where he recommends irrigating the southern d fields at Round Lake Park this year after the softball season, waiting until next year to see if the Middle School Football Field will be available to the City, and if not, light one of the fields at Round Lake Park to tournament standards in 1982 and . the other one in 1983. Mx:grey requested Staff to provide a layout of the fields showing what the lighted area would be after the first year and after the second year. Also, he requests Staff to find out how much additional money it will cost to phase the lighting over two years instead of doing it all at once. MOTION: Kingrey moved to recommend to the Council the following: As a result of the agreed upon transfer of a lighted practice area from Starring Lake Park to Round Lake Park, it is recommended by this Commission that the middle 2 softball fields south of Valley View Rd., be lighted in two stages occurring over two years and as a result of the additional play on those field areas, irrigation is required to maintain those areas in acceptable condition. Irrigation is proposed in 1981, lighting of one field in 1982 and lighting of the other in 1983. Schwartz seconded the motion and it carried unanimoualy. r I- I • • •••• 100 •-•Co• I (79 eP, 0 CZ . 0 0 0 5 LAYO u-r A 0,S14. 0 C a euTrIELo CHSTANCE I 2C. F:C. I firl,F-.L. f.> :1..- jr.. pot r. "A --1., HT. ....__ •.: c :.: A ZPREAL TOTAL Zoo' • 4 5— i e r, s • r -1 Et - i c. s • I C.- ".t, (..• 5. -. ! ,• . _ _ • . . -GMAIMAIRE TO 5E* f-I Mex. -rzo- V5C5A4- 5E.RI 15S TOTAL. REG: D. 41. • E. D PRA: =kir_ Po I-1:: G pert NC. s•loct-v• • I. SO F.C. : /4 rf E-L 1:# • • - r.z. -:-.p:r.t..0 • t. . •-••••:. ri ....,-, :-4 r :7: ta.:•\/.,-, 3 P'14-r.Acs ..........----.......--7— -ro-rAt.... -1 4-• .- t.'. 4 g • i 1 2. a — , - - Ca Le' • 3 - _ TOTAL_ C.:TY. so .2 • i1• LU.Y. A: P.M TO Pf.- . • HrrEc TZ-- !Soo /4-4 P TOTAL. lica.<4* 1:) p_a I LAYOUT PEAR, riEt_o .4/11 Lilo. E.DETNI PRA'. la. r:. spac-4: L.,1 co-m.1 sc., 10 oc C.) r'reLD .• ."%trriel-D to F.C. / /4 PlE.L LI -7 h CT: f!..-7M-s SPI•kt_AD 71n, Al- i _ ..: ‹. I SS. I . 2. CZ 3 3 TOTAL. ti Vi-, i 0 a a- II- LUM KM TO gat 1 HIT= K. TX.' ISCO tv).-Ca ZE.R1 Ke.CI'Lts „?..3 •-•-c/I-J6-j0.-1 4/9) &17/07 o 4 I S C. .j / 3 I LUMINAIKE TO be /-1 ITEI4 *TT- I=OM- "311'. SZRI TOTAL REA D. -41 A I -AS' C=1 D PS t:.. LTMcb 0 C2 o C LAYOUT' of.lk 1-D CuTrIELD I F.C. I:WILD 0: STAN:. F.r . D HT.'CA PRE AD 2 • C) • floeree - - See Croquet • .• •-• • See Croquet Before 6 After Event s • During Event• 2 s 2 i 5.4' I 2.2 5.4 2.2 Sooting ' 10 5 32 22 11 5.4 Shuffleboard i Tournament Recreational 30 ... .. 20 .• 11 • 11 •••• - 5.4 1.1 - 5 1 Skating I .. Roller Rink , Ice Lagoon. Pond or Flooded Area 10 • 10 i • - Skeet . - i ! I i I - Firing 'Points • 5.— Targets ...- E ging Points Targets 5.2 12 30• Skeet &Trip - • . Combination • : Firing : Points Targets firing 1 Points I Targets 5.4 I 12••• ! 5 . 304.• - Ski slope Recreational ' - 1 •-• • • 1.1 Soccer - See football .- . See Footcall Softball • -• • . • • ' Professional & Championship Semi-Professional Industrial League Recreational (6.pole) Skim Piton, Tournament Sc... Pitch, Recreational (6-pole) Corn tination with football • • • . - -- .. . ••-• - - - - . I Infield --- ..--- I 50 : 30 I 20 10 20 . 10 See Combination Outfield I - •••• • .- - _ . Int.eld Outfield Si 32 n 11 22 11 See Combination 12 22 18 1.5 7.5- . 13 . 20- , 15 I 7 ! 15 - 7 Squash - • See Handball See Handball Swimming . Exhibitiora Recreational Underwater ia 50 ' , 30 100. - 20 10 60. 54 1 32 i 110• 22 11 65% . Tennis. Table , Tournament Club . Recreational • 50 I 30 20 _ _ .- 54 az 22 - -- ••-• Tournament Cltdo Recreational 50 1 . 30 • 20 33 20 10 64 32 12 32 22 11 Tennis. Lawn . . Trap . • i Firing Points I Targets • n • ... • • Firing .Pints Targets 1 5.4 n 5• 30' • 22 11 Volley 80 1 • Tournament . Recreational ' - -- 29 10 See Suing Wrestling See Boxing • ' • Telecasting or other special considerations may require higher tells Of Morel. nation. See Sect•on 22. • ssmo Limens per seluare foot of water surface. • fcc:canoles (oesalux), verticat, at CO feet (24.4 meters) for Bait Casting; 59 feet 652 meters) for wet or ory.f,y casting. • 5 1oat; a r.:;es (54 Cci.atux). serves!, at 203 yarda(133 maters)and 10 loctcandles ditaat....). horizontal, over tee eras. 439 lootianCtes (12 de:talus), vertical. on trap target at 100 feet (30.5 meters). •• 30 footcandles (12 dekalux), vertical. on skeet target a 63 feet (13.3 meters) • Class I Jr. League Baseba I Includes Little League. Little Boys League, Know, League. etc. • Class It Jr. League Baseball Includes Pony League, Bigger League, ate. • ail values represent minimum maintained Illumination in • horizontal plane unless otherwise indicated. Jona dekalux equals ten lux. the SI unit for Illumination. ." • Illumination on II vertical plane. tiJ ALL 1. ZIT. !gr. aria -- ag43. .'tr,A3 Cf7,11.3-2. • 0 4M1i.; Cff1.6.0 /4::416!RILIZ :Aaierg.Z. c5:113,t7 ' .Fr.21;rjr,:i1T2,7,OR otic 7.1i; ;44,-..!LI,;;;Li.; 4;ta (170110g: ol1c4,0'fr.::..;:ai...c.,..J.1.71- ; Rekiçrj r.T:67: MD .4' ta.d.1 Carji,1,6,142 /ORD. OS.VCaltilli.' • PHOTOMETRICS 406W. HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM, 50,000 LUMENS 14" ISOCANDELA DIAGRAM 1501 HEPEHIT 440.30370 - NEMA TYPE 2 - BEAM SPREAD.- 21I'H n 24"V IMP • 1000 watt METAL HALIDE ICLEA11195,6O0 LUMENS - MAX CP • 1.430,000 12" 10' II" 6' r cr r 4" 6• e 10' 12' 14' 77 71 61 36 26 21 18 _ 134 174 101' ,..7.7. 42 26 20 lialtir 1 ---- ...._ 214 189 156 125 10 41 24 332 294 234 180 122 'qo 32 I NN.......--- Ell 1 I 1,0"'°'"a I E---- 484 413 320 246 172 100, 47 775 610 422 302 207 126 62 1457 834 481 330 230 145 173 sk L I k kI ININI ,, N _.,t, L,, c .c4,1 . 1285 710 463 \ ..., 334 239 152 ;74 3-,-.., _3001-----000 -- 605 496 380 293 216 135 ' 62 196 355 310 258 180 107 46 200 221 270 216 250 216 130 ,*73 33 NG 142 • 83 43 23 148 132 102 2) 45 26 18 . 113,2,6 . I _ _ GO 54 46 35 23 17 IS CAM.11.1. PONNIE1 1.1.11511A5 NEMA TYPE 2 3 4 5 6 l'''''‘ 6d 27' • 27' 39' • 39' 63'44 59' 216' 4 93' 166' • WV Dom Elltoency 3937 33 4.; 61 f1.4 112'. 736'. ' M. CP . 715.212 03/620 237 554 102 510 07140 I'll H''''''' Norntw 30430 11.495 11,064 11.068 11,372 1000W. IIIGH PRESSURE SODIUM, 140,000 LUMENS NEMA TYPE 2 3 4 5 6 14's V" 91/A N/A 65' • 64' 31 • os • isr. Ise Own Ell.c.4ncy NIA PHA 400'. 072'. '19 • 01....11.10. N,A N A 1 201.275 3.2027 314 307 leit Itroo ,1 N/A NA 30447 3045 242146 1000W. METAL•HALI DE (Clear Lamp), 05,000 LUMENS NINA INTL 2 1 4 s 6 B !l• 25' • 24• 43'. a 42' C1.1.' • C13' 99' • 93' 105' a 805" gam. kliivencv 40 1. 44 3" ..3 9 • 1.) 3'. ''3 ". 41a..4144444 CI. i 4.40 OW 7211,4 :72 :41. 140 001 (.1 1,1 1." )l "" 30370 30416 311225 31011 31012 "="7c: 1500 W. ME TAL.IIALIDE (Clem Lontil ,1•15,000 LUMENS 4' o' 2' 4' 8' • so' 14 114 61 5 1YPE 2 3 4 5 6 u-v... 20. 24' 13'. 12' la' a G!I' 110 • 93' It,: • 105. 11..n. I ....nay 40 2`, 443'. :77 ....1 , ,0 4., 34 172 4•••mont CI' ;As; ,11 1 101 4:7 4 ,' '.11 140 Iles.1 Nombn 30370 30110 3101.4 31011 31012 ,••n••••/,'•••n• nn•••••"••••••••••••• • • ./... • . e••• ' Pe " IAil 3,- J.,.... ____,....,.,.__,,,,......._,.....;„ • omit 11'. 0.000 LUMENS FA hIA 1N1'1. 3 r 3 4 5 5 1••.' 11 . • V . N/A N/A NIA 14/11 114', 161. 1144A•111..sa4y N A 44 A AlAamwAt 1*' PI A N A NA NA NA NA 41 120 • Int 11,011 N•••••• N/A N/A N/A 4400 31111411 Lb" 1 ,n 111.01114. AVAILABLE DISTRIBUTIONS Chaim Murmurs & NEMA Clasulgaton BEAM SPREAD H ', V ' 400 Watt Iligh. PrewaN &mem 1000 Will liqh Prompt. Snenan 1000 Watt atrial Hallett Clem' 1500 Wall Mom betel Cleat 1000 W. Mettuty DX • 2 27' II 27' N A 2e 's 7 i 25'. 7•5' 0.0 3 39' .30' NA 43' • 42' at • 42' U A 4 63' a 09' 60'. 84 Go' r69' ea' • 0 11' IV, a 5 46. ‘ 93*. 9". clf r 06' .1 93 • 96' • 93' e 8 1101' 57041 6 106' 4106' tla . II 104...1 C, 1 ,1 .; • 1111.-i To Specify different leant Spreads, Cl: J olt .tivr GP or MO in Catalog Mambo, to correct NLMA des vnation. Example: To bidet a NIMA 3 beans sty earl replace the 2 with a 3. TJ 1000 M H03 120. Vlachun pre ccccc d areal 2.1 h0.1 1. • Aq nal 14 I ICI 'TING DIVISION • 1.111 IONIA I ICI !TING 72,Cian Innis% illy, Ind. 47933 IONL/ 1.3I 7.362.1S37 CAns •nn adranaa 1..11 ow et Ils Ao. used loe all PerMA 4.54 Mild. buttons t.ef et 1000 wall Mon Wept.. Seaton*. Used I or all NYMA 7 63 1101,011 and I 0 0 Wail t emit Wessute Saution, NINA 4+6. 0001.111 Aiming Sight Degree Scale V•160 Yoke (OptIonal1 Allows 180 . Movement OSUMI. 1.-- • - lb" .1! Standatn Yoe., Captive ' Allows 90 1 Movement 141nt1e ol 1Jtut. (ORDERING INFORMATION SPECIFICATIONS TYPE LAMP CATALOG Nuraut R wow BEAM SPREAD W 4 V WEIGHT 11.6s.1 GENERAL PURPOSE NEMA HEAVY DUTY 1000 Walt Mercury TJ 1000 H GPO TJ 1000 H HOG 104 . 4 1040 43 46.5 1000 Watt Metal • Halide TI 1000 M GP2 TJ 1000 M H02 25" x 24" 52 55.5 1500 Watt Metal •Utile TJ 1500 M GP2 TJ 1500 M HD2 25" It 24" 57.5 Cl 400 Watt Ho p i e,s w e Sodium TJ 400 S GP2 TJ 400 S H02 27'e 270 44 47.5 1000 Watt 114.0 Pressure NO(1111R1 13 1000 S GPS TJ 1000 5 HOS 91 *x 913 * 54 57.5 maire shall be NE MA (specify heavy•duty general. purpose, construction. Rabat housing shall be the cast aluminum and have a protective coating of baked. oil-free polyester enamel. The che•cast animator wiring compartment and socket housing shall have ) adjustable socket.. The optical assembly shall be of spun aluminum and sealed. The tempered. shock.resistant lens shall be gasketed and secured in a corrosionleustant steel lens ring. Three stainless steel latches shall secure the lens assembly to the reflector. The unit shall have a hotqlipped galvanized steel yoke and reposition stop. All hardware shall be of a corrosion.resistant material. The luminaire shalt provide NEMA type (specify)dis. tribution with a minimum beam efficiency of (specify) when used with a (specify) lamp. The ballast shall be toe Options and Acce , 0001 tor val•Ous mounting and installation •ondiliOnt. Vullaqe Is avail., le 170 Into 480 soils and MAO be Walled AS catalog number win.. high power factor and operate the specified lamp Example .TJ 5000 M1102 460. • according to the lamp manufacturer's specifications. The luminaire shall be equal to Hi-Tek catalog number (specify). ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS* , la,. .An A4, Mu aST TM 51081105 COMM ON 01016CuadM1 avn nor 611115 MGMATitill t Atk1:14.,4A T. T s no 208 040 m ow Mtn 171(SSUM 500100 4, $,, A.1...10211/11M1 1.9 i 9 Li 415 I 10%• I 10'. Koo 0 ....e t, ,t.. pip.-..dargi , 3 9 39 2 35 1180 a 10%• I Ice. 101. .6.181 401 ItUteURT orb F .'1'..: 1.444 EREEE 1075 1 105. • I 10% 1580 CWA Peak lead 8.7 7 4.4 34 138 79 9 $ :/2/ 33 1470 I 10%• 5I0'. • Typical data at nominal Input values. All ballasts have at least 90 1. pawn factor. DIMENSIONS and MOUNTING OPTIONS ACCESSOR n ES os tap. on M. Nona 0[51018010N 01,N ,1•11,1 ,1 (To 0,0 mid 44.4441.0% 4tool....4.0.044 nnonbol . Si 5,41.4 1:0 :11040 -Dl D...e ..110,4 :04 :08 400 Veit ... 0145 0.4*It 44 .04 1,110,1, .. 641 211 al Co la 1 Sl) C44. F,, .,S -CU 211 o 1 kJ I j J al C no. 15, n.nd - CH Ill Ono II. sac.:•••••,.....4 .• SLR Sdanan Sinn 1,-Inn, .- All Alva. 10.ne0,14 J....nd • 5144 55 I'S..,,,' Vita 1 Cainto0 141104111 F.,........_.nn 414,.. I ---- 'pints MEMORANDUM TO: THRU: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Carl Jullie, City Manager Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services May 29, 1981 Preserve Park Bike Trail On February 3, 1981, the Eden Prairie City Council reviewed the Basswood Terrace Development Proposal in the Preserve. At that meeting, the Developer committed to constructing an asphalt pathway with the Basswood Terrace Development Proposal commencing at Basswood Road and terminating at the eastern boundary of Nesbitt Preserve Park (at Center Way). 'During that meeting, a resident of the Preserve that lives north of Preserve Park requested the City Council to construct a bike trail within Preserve Park connecting to the bike trail that is being constructed along Anderson Lakes Parkway. That resident pointed out the high speed traffic along Center Way and felt that such a trail would be used as a safe access to the bike trail along Anderson Lakes Parkway. The Council asked if City staff could complete that project this summer. Staff indicated in the affirmative in that construction would be taking place along Anderson Lakes Parkway. City Council then requested staff to provide cost estimates on that trail section. Last week the City graded in that trail section as the last portion of grading for the Anderson Lakes bike trail is being completed. Earlier this week it was pointed out that the City Council merely requested bike trail cost estimates and did not authorize construction of that section of trail (sorry about that folksy Lambert is not perfect after all). Cost estimate for that section Of trail is approximately $5,000. City staff would request approval to proceed with the completion of the construction of that trail section. Trail construction to be funded through cash park fees. BL:ind 1,247 John D. Frane, Clerk VIM Ls 1201 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. R81-109 RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FORA HEARING ( I.C. 51-381 ) WHEREAS, a report has been given by the City Engineer to the • City Council on June 2, 1981, recommending the following improvements ' to wit: I.C. 51-381, Sanitary sewer NOW, THEREFONE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: 1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of property abutting or within said boundaries for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to M.S.A. 429.111 to 429.111 at an estimated total cost of the improvements as shown. 2.. A public hearing will be held on such proposed improvements on the 7th day of 'July, 1981, at 7:30 PAC at the Eden Prairie City Hall. The City Clerk sball give published and mailed notice of such hearing on the improvements as required by law. .ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST June 2, 1981 CONTRACTOR (Multi-Family) J. B. Swedenborg CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 Family) Agency 494, Inc. Brossard Homes, Inc. Darley G. March C. N. Ostrom & Son Scandia Construction Schmidgall Contracting PLUMBING Aarons Plumbing & Sewer Apple Valley Plumbing Lance Coppin Sewer & Water McQuire Plumbing & Heating Rainbow Mechanical BAKERY DEPARTMENT Driskill's Super Valu MEAT DEPARTMENT Driskill's Super Valu HEATING & Ventilating Rainbow Mechanical SUPERMARKET Driskill's Super Valu VENDING MACHINE Driskill's Super Valu Coca Cola Bottling CIGARETTES & TOBACCO Driskill's Super Valu 3.2 BEER OFF SALE Driskill's Super Valu 3.2 BEER ON SALE A Slice of Italy. Inc. - Public Safety Report Attached These licenses have been approved by the .department head responsible for the licensed activity. Pa Salle, Licensing Clerk May 21, 1981 TO: Captain Keith Wall FROM: Det. Sgt. Les Bridger SUBJECT: Application of "A Slice of Italy" for an on-sale 3.2 beer license The investigation of the application made by persons representing the above business has been completed. I have learned that there will be four persons ' who will own stock and interest in tho company. Patti Jo Kovar 7365 Scot Terrace Eden Prairie, MN Date of birth: 10-5-58 Home phone: 941-0975 Business phone: 884-2133 Thomas Ray Anderson #9 Malcalm Avenue Minneapolis, MN Date of birth: 4-9-58 Home phone: 379-1530 Business phone: 545-0401 Barry Michael Anderson 4550 Central Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, MN Date of birth: 1-19-58 Home phone: 574-0143 Hamid Berenjian 7365 Scot Terrace Eden Prairie, MN Date of birth: 10-1-56 Home phone: 941-0975 Further investigation revealed that Ms. Kovar will be assuming a rather passive role as president of the company due to other business committments. Ms. Kovar owns a corporation which she operates out of her home and sells women's gold jewelry and clothing. She is also employed as an assistant manager of the L. M. Fine Company in Bloomington. Ms. Kovar advised that Mr. Berenjian is her roommate and full partner in the proposed business. Thomas Anderson will be acting as business manager and Barry Anderson will be operations manager. Barry holds stock in the company. Apparently Thomas Anderson and Hami!i Berenjian have prior experience in the pizza business. In completing the background checks on these parties, I have only one concern and that deals with Mr. Barry Anderson. He was arrested and convicted of driving while intoxicated in 1979. I find no other alcohol-related violations since then, but feel that his position with the company could lend itself to him becoming intoxicated on the premises. We would, however, be in a position to monitor that possibility and take what action the situation might dictate. Otherwise, I have no reservations at this time and would recommend the application for the license be approved. I 2 Sl i