The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council - 04/07/1981 ,, AA, / J. /-'l AGENDA M~ /' • O I )(r�� FUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHTY,Ais 0� -16 9-./ky t` 'UESDAY, APRIL 7, 1981 7:30 PM, CITY HALL HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath and George Tangen HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY STAFF: Acting City Manager John D. Frane, City Engineer Carl Jullie, and Karen Michael, Recording Secretary • INVOCATION: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 4).. (D !(''_.,4-4II. ELECTION OF OFFICERS /'� • III. MINUTES OF HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING HELD MONDAY, MARCH Page 743 30, 1981r4 IV. SECTION 8 EXISTING RENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (Resolution No. 81-69) Page 744 r V. ADJOURN MEETING ( x j EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL 3 • I' TUESDAY, APRIL 7, 1981 Immediately following Housing & Redevelopment Authority Meeting A COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath and George Tangen I COUNCIL STAFF: Acting City Manager John Frane; City 1. Attorney Roger Pauly; Planning Director 1 Chris Enger; Director of Community Services t Bob Lambert; City Engineer Carl Jullie; J and Karen Michael, Recording Secretary I 1. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS i II. MINUTES 1 A. Special City Council Meeting held Friday, February 27, 1981 Page 746. 1 B. Special. City Council Meeting held Saturday, February 28, 1981 Page 747 C. Special City Council Meeting held Wednesday, March 4, 1981 Page 748 D. Special City Council Meeting held Thursday, March 12, 1981 Page 749 E. Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 17, 1981 Page 750 Lity Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,Apri1 7, 1981 F. Joint City Council/Planning Commission Meeting held Monday, March Page 760 41 23, 1981 G. Special City Council Meeting held Monday, March 23, 1981 Page 762 H. Special City Council Meeting held Monday, March 30, 1981 Page 763 III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Set Co. Rd. 4/TH 5 Plan Study Public Hearing for April 21, 1981 B. Clerk's License List Page 764 • C. Final plat approval for Maple Leaf Acres 9th Addition (Resolution Page 765 A 1r4ti No. 81-7D) 0 n°��f. Approve plans and specifications and authorize bids for signal at Page 768 ,�' ",0o TH 169/Anderson Lakes Parkway, I.C. 51-341, Agreement No. } //e. 60375M (Resolution Nos. 81-71 and 81-76) . 1 +) F. Approve agreement with MnDOT regarding railroad crossing signals Page 774 -� on Valley View Road west of Round Lake, Agreement No. 60376 (Resolution No. 81-72) G. Approval of construction plans for permanent traffic signals and Page 779 channelization at TH 169/Co. Rd. 1 intersection (Resolution No. 81-74) H. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 79-04, rezoning from Rural to RM 6.5 Page 780 and R1-13.5 for Lake Heights Addition and developer's agreement r`; ,)I. Final a royal of Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the Page 791 1 1)` °'" amount of 1,000,000.00 for Wilson Learning Center (Resolution No. 81-68) yr if ; J. Policy change in auto allowance Page 792 1 .L'f . M P K. Approve plans and specifications and order bids for improvements Page 793 on W. 70th Street, Shady Oak Industrial Park 5th Addition, I.C. ,_,op,>-• �-51-344C Resolution No. 81-75) / ( (( cr,r�"�� ;("r` IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS �,/ e,, ,, ,�, G \�r/b f {� MTS/MCC Industrial Campus by MTS Sys'l�ms Corporation and Magnetic Page 464 t,, I-'- 4 Controls Company. Request for PUD Concept approval of industrial , +'t' and commercial uses upon 158 acres. Located southeast of Mitchell Road and TH 5 (Resolution No. 81-35) Continued from March 3, 1981 /J S. Vacating a lortion of Sunnybrook Road in Olympic Hills 6th Addition Page 598 (Resolution No. 81-50j Continued from March 3, 1981 C. )CPT PUD. Request for PUD Concept approval of 30 acres zoned 1-5 Page 794 ( f'1;- to use greater than 50 of the buildings as office space. Located 1 in the northwest quadrant of Mitchell Road and Scenic Heights 1 ' ''r Road. (Resolution No. 81-66) Al- ti • City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,April 7, 1981 c D. Valle Place Offices by C.S.J. Development. Request to rezone 4 acres Page 822 , from Rural to Office for town offices. Located at 9975 Valley View Road. (Ordinance No. 81-08) V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 5789 - 6015 Page 840 VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Request from Bev Cronk on review of House Moving Ordinance No. 79-34 Page 302 (Continued from 3/3/81) f B. Request for a 3-way stop sign at the orner of Homeward Hills Road Page 845 and Concord Drive - Bluffs West 1st Addition VIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Appointment of City Manager 1 r° 4B. Report of City Attorney Z 1. MAC Status Report . ��,,) f'11 v C. Report of Acting City Manager_,. 'l��, �`�U rl/+-.�r., '/ D. Report of Planning Director ' e ' Hwy. 169/212 - discussion of the official Hwy. 169/212 map Page 850 (Continued fro 3/17/81) r 1 9'/ P`� Le ter m Donald Goetzman Page B56 0 34— E. R of City.Engineer / bo Final plat approval for Olympic Hills 6th Addition (Resolution Page 577 a No. 81-51) Continued from 3/3/81 4(2. Receive 100Y, petition and order feasibility report for Hilger/ Page 859 Bearman Properties on Valley View Road '� F. Report of Director of Community Services .t a 1"�'"' . I. Swedlund Property - Riley Lake ,;; Q Ow Page 862 2. Round Lake Park Shelter bids J Page 863 3. Staring Lake Master Plan ("4: Page 864 Page 867 4. Appeal - Riley Lake (,),‹ ( 5. Proposed State Finance Commission budget c s for Shady Tree Program Page 877 1 IX. NEW BUSINESS X. ADJOURNMENT. UNAPPROVED MINUTES SPECIAL HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING MONDAY, MARCH 30, 1981 9:00 P.M, CITY HALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath, and George Tangen • The special meeting of the Eden Prairie Housing & Redevelopment Authority was called to order at 9 p.m. by Mayor Wolfgang Penzel. The meeting was convened to hear a special report from Roger Pauly, City Attorney. Mr. Pauly recommended the retention of the O'Connor & Hannan law firm in matters of the tax increment financing law suit which is underway. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, that the Housing & Redevelopment Authority retain the O'Connor & Hannan law firm as its legal counsel as per the attached retainer agreement. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen, and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Moved by Edstrom, seconded by Bentley, to adjourn the meeting of the Housing & Redevelopment Authority at 9:07 p.m. • • 7y3 • DATE: March 4, 1981 ' Participating Communities ic. �f 's TO: Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program HENNEPIN Hennepin County FROM: Office of Planning and Development ';.y-.:-a,.• SUBJECT: SECTION 8 EXISTING PROGRAM • . The Section 8 Existing Rent Assistance Program is administered by the Metro- . politan Council Housing and Redevelopment Authority (Metro HRA). The program's purpose is to help lower income families to obtain decent, affordable housing. Eligible families and elderly or disabled individuals may select a rental unit in any of the Metro HRA participating communities. Privately owned apartment units, duplexes, townhouses, single family homes, cooperatives, congregate housing and mobile homes may be selected as long as they are in good condition . and within the current rent limits. The Metro HRA program uses both local and metro'staff resources. Families and individuals may apply in most of the participating communities with local staff to serve them. Communities choosing to provide staff services will be reim- bursed from the federal funds received by Metro HRA for administrative services. In some communities, Metro HRA provides staff to the community on a part-time basis. Local inspectors are used to determine whether rental units meet HUD established Housing Quality Standards. Services provided at the Metro level include applications to HUD for funding, selection of eligible applicants, approval of leases and housing assistance payments contracts, bookkeeping and accounting functions, and program monitoring. As an Urban Hennepin County CMG participant, your community, by availing it- self of the Section 8 Existing Rent Assistance Program, would enhance the po- tential of meeting our mutual housing goals. Please carefully consider making the Section 8 Program available to your citizens. This can be done by simply passing the attached resolution. The resolution authorizes the Metro HRA to apply for Section 8 Existing funds on behalf of the community. If your com- munity has a Housing and Redevelopment Authority, the local HRA must also ap- prove joining the Metro HRA program. Q.certified-eopyrof.•the-resoJ.u,ti,Qn shout.d•be-returned•by.ApriL15.to your Urban Hennepin County planning area representative to assure timely participation. If you have any question about the program or the resolution, contact your planning area representative. bp . ( Enclosure -7qL • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ' HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 81-69 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL • TO APPLY FOR HOUSING ASSISTANCE FUNDS FOR IMPLEMENTATION WITHIN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has been duly organized pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 473.06, subd. 3 and Minnesota Laws 1975. Chapter.13, ' Section 6, subd. 3; Section 21, subd. 1; and Section 24, and has all of the powers and duties of a housing and redevelopment authority pursuant to Laws 1975, Chapter 13, Section 24 under the provisions of the Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 462.411 to 462.711, and acts amendatory thereof; WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie and the Metropolitan Council desire to assist lower income families and individuals to obtain adequate housing in the City of Eden Prairie at a price they can afford, and to accomplish this purpose desire to apply for federal funds to undertake a program of subsidizing rent payments to landlords who provide adequate housing to such individuals and families. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that the Metropolitan Council is hereby authorized to include the City of Eden Prairie in its application for federal funds to implement a program of rental assistance to lower income families and individuals, and that upon federal approval of such application, the City of Eden Prairie and the Metropolitan Council will enter into an agreement for operating the program within the City. AOOPTED, by.the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Eden Prairie this 17 day of March , 1981. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL UNAPPROVED MINUTES SPECIAL EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1981 6:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath and George Tangen The special meeting of the Eden Prairie City Council was called to interview candidates for City Manager. The format was as follows: there was a one hour interview of each candidate followed by a one-half hour discussion of the can- didate by members of the Council. The candidates interviewed were: 6:00 PM - Candidate #1 7:30 PM - Candidate #79 9:00 PM - Candidate #33 MOTION: Moved by Edstrom, seconded by Tangen, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried unanimously. • • �itl{ • • /' • • r UNAPPROVED MINUTES ` SPECIAL EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1981 9:0D AM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath and George Tangen The special meeting of the Eden Prairie City Council was called to interview candidates for City Manager. The format was as follows: there was a one hour interview of each candidate followed by a one-half hour discussion of the can- didate by members of the Council. The candidates interviewed were: 9:00 AM - Candidate #5 10:30 AM - Candidate #61 Noon - lunch break 1:00 PM - Candidate #81 { 2:30 PM - Candidate #6 4:00 PM - Candidate #3 MOTION: Moved by Bentley, seconded by Edstrom, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried unanimously. 741 UNAPPROVED MINUTES SPECIAL EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 1981 4:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath and George Tangen The special meeting of the Eden Prairie City Council was called to interview candidates for City Manager. The format was as follows: there was a one hour interview of each candidate followed by a one-half hour discussion of the can- didate by members of the Council. The candidates interviewed were: 4:30 PM - Candidate #90 6:00 PM - Candidate #34 7:30 PM - Candidate #46 9:00 PM - Candidate #69 ( MOTION: Moved by Tangen, seconded by Bentley, to schedule a Special Meeting of the City Council for 7:30 p.m., Thursday, March 12, 1981. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Moved by Edstrom, seconded by Redpath, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried unanimously. • UNAPPROVED MINUTES SPECIAL EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING THURSDAY, MARCH 12, 1981 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Oean Edstrom, Paul Redpath and George Tangen The special meeting of the Eden Prairie City Council was called to order by Mayor Penzel. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the calls made by each of the Council members and the Mayor to persons listed as references by the candidates for City Manager. Questions were developed of hypothetical po- sitions to pose to candidates during the final round of interviews. Special meetings of the City Council were set for: March 13, 1981 - 7:30 p.m.: meet with City Attorney re: litigation March 23, 1981 - 6:30 p.m.: joint meeting with Planning Commission re: City Center site Special meetings in regard to the hiring of a new City Manager were scheduled for: March 14, 1981 - leave City Hall at 1:30 p.m. to visit Prior Lake, Minnesota March 21, 1981 - leave City Hall at 7:45 a.m. to visit Grand Island, Nebraska March 23, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. - re-interview local candidates March 28, 1981 - leave City Hall at 1:30 p.m. to visit Lakeville, Minnesota March 30, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. - decide on new City Manager MOTION: Moved by Redpath, seconded by Edstrom, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried unanimously. 7119 UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL 1 TUESDAY, MARCH 17, 1981 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath, and George Tangen COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: Acting City Manager John D. Frane, City Attorney Rick Rosow, Planning Director Chris Enger, City Engineer Carl Jullie, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael INVOCATION: Councilman George Bentley PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: All members present I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following items were added to the Agenda: III. Consent Calendar H. 2. Mn/DOT utility installation agreement No. 60330 in conjunction with prososed improvements at TH 169/County Rd. 1 intersection (Resolution No. 81-65); Presentation by the Rotary - to follow Item I; and VIII. C. 1. Approval of bids for fixtures for liquor store. The following items were removed from the regular Agenda and placed on the Consent Calendar: L. Receive feasibility report for improvements on Bennett Place, I.C. 51-375 (Resolution No. 81-59) - formerly VIII. E. 1.; and M. Approve Hennepin County preliminarplans for improvements on Co. Rd. 4 at Valley View Road, I.C. 51-325 (Resolution No. 81-60) - formerly VIII. E. 2. The following item was removed from the Consent Calendar and added to the Report of City Attorney: VIII. B. 1. Revision to Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide Plan Review - formerly III. G. MOTION: Moved by Redpath, seconded by Bentley, to approve the agenda as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. PRESENTATION BY ROTARY Tim Pierce, President of the Rotary Club of Eden Prairie, presented a check for $2,000 to the City. This represented the second of three installments towards the purchase of a van used for transporting Senior Citizens. Mayor Penzel accepted the check on behalf of the City; explained how volunteer drivers use the van to transport Senior Citizens; and thanked the Rotary Club for their contribution. -75U City Council Minutes -2- March 17, 1981 II. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, MARCH 3, 1981 Page 2, item IV. B., line 1 of Motion: change "terminate action on" to "withdraw". Page 4, para. 2, line 1: change "as" to 'so much"; line 2: add "concerned" between "were" and "with". Page 8, para. 1, line 5: "tiers" should be "tires". MOTION: Moved by Edstrom, seconded by Redpath, to approve the minutes of the March 3, 1981 Council meeting as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 8I-03, rezoning 5 acres to k1-13.5 and 2.5 acres to RM 6.5 for Basswood Terrace by The Preserve and developer's agreement B. Final plat approval for Basswood Terrace (Resolution No. 81-62) C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance 81-06, rezoning the 25' of Outlot R, Lake Eden, Preserve 3rd Addition by The Preserve, from Rural to RM 6.5 D. Set Public Hearing date for Valley Place Offices by C.S.J. Development for April 7, 1981 E. Approve plans and specifications and order bids for pedestrian bridge over Valley View Road at Round Lake Park, I.C. 51-325 III (Resolution No. 81-57) F. Stipulation agreement with Chicago/Milwaukee Railroad Co. for new Valley View Road at-grade crossing, I. C. 51-325 (Resolution 81-58) G. Revision to Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide Plan Review - to VIII. B. 1. H. 1. Mn/DOT Traffic Control Signal Agreement No. 60070 for TH 169/Co. Rd. 1 intersection (Resolution No. 81-63) 2. Mn/DOT utility installation agreement No. 60330 in conjunction with pro- posed improvements at TH 169/Co. Rd. 1 intersection (Resolution No. 81-65) I. Approve plans and specifications and order bids for utility improvements on Luther Way, Meadow Lane and Round Lake Park, I.C. 51-395 (Resolution No. 81-64 J. Clerk's License List K. Continue request from Bev Cronk on review of new Housing Moving Ordinance No. 79-34 to April 7, 1981 L. Receive feasibility report for improvements on Bennett Place, I.C. 51-375 (Resolution No. 81-59) M. Approve Hennepin County preliminary plans for improvements on Co. Rd. 4 at Valley View Road, I.C. 51-325 IV Resolution No. 81-60) City Council Minutes -3- March 17, 1981 MOTION: Moved by Tangen, seconded by Redpath, to approve items A - M on the Consent Calendar as amended. Motion carried unanimously. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Rezoning of properties back into Plan Study. Located in the Southeast, Northeast and Southwest quadrants of Co. Rd. 4 and TH 5 (Ordinance No. 81-07) Planning Director Enger explained that this rezoning was instituted by City because these properties are inconsistent with the Guide Plan. On March 9, 1981, the Planning Commission recommended placing these properties into Plan Study for the period of one year. MOTION: Moved by Redpath, seconded by Bentley, to close the public hearing and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 81-07, rezoning of properties back into Plan Study. Motion carried unanimously. B. Street and drainage improvements on Hilltop Road, I.C. 51-380 (Reso- Tution No. 81-55) City Engineer Jullie explained the proposed street and drainage improve- ments on Hilltop Road and gave the construction costs and assessment data. The proposed improvement would include grading of the existing road and placing a 4" gravel base and a 2" bituminous surface 24' wide with sodding and topsoil as required to restore adjacent boulevard areas. The proposed street section is interim and does not include concrete curb and gutter because sanitary sewer and water services are not available for extension to the area at this time. The drainage area of the project includes approx- imately 23 acres. The project was initiated at the request of the neighbors via a petition to the Council in June 1980. Other alternatives are possible which would not be as extensive as the proposed project. Edstrom asked when sewer and water might be available to residents of this area. Jullie stated that it would probably be 1990 with the earliest being three years or so with a lift station. John Hansen, 16200 Hilltop Road, stated he was the originator of the petition and was surprised to see the projected cost. He expressed views of the neigh- borhood residents with the consensus being a lesser project should be looked int, Bill Barth, 16481 Hilltop Road, said that the neighbors are in the process of petitioning for natural gas which would mean that the road would have to be torn up if their request is granted. He also indicated that the project is beyond the scope the neighbors had expected. Paul Sylvander, 16451 Hilltop Road, expressed concern about putting in a new road before sewer and water connections are made available. Wayne Enquist, 6675 - 175th Avenue, owns a vacant lot and had not anticipated the expense of the proposed project in the cost of the home he wishes to build in about two years. -752 City Council Minutes -4- March 17, 1981 M. Rivkin, 16555 Hilltop Road, (husband of Shirley Schenck) spoke to the drainage problem. He said that it is his belief that the problem could be corrected by extending the present drainage pipe down to the creek. Mayor Penzel read a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Donald Schiebe, 16150 Hilltop Road, which urged the Council not to approve the project. (see attached) Ken Grover, 16050 Hilltop Road, questioned whether objecting to the proposal precludes any improvement. Penzel explained that the Council has taken no action and will not do so until other options are presented. Ray Brasch, 16400 Hilltop Road, said that he would have problems getting in and out of his driveway should Hilltop Road be hard-surfaced. MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Tangen, to continue the hearing to April 21, 1981, to allow Staff to consider alternatives including the cost of extending existing pipe, seal coating, and paving. Motion carried unanimously. Bill Rietherman, 16401 Hilltop Road, spoke to the drainage issue, and stated that the percolation rate in the area is excellent. C. Request for Municipal Industrial Development Bond approval in the amount of $350,000 for S & D Properties (Resolution No. 81-56) Acting City Manager Frane explained all documents have been submitted and are in order. Ken Norwich, bond counsel with Miller & Schroeder, spoke to the proposal and answered questions of Council members. Jerome J. Schwab, one of the principals, was also available to answer questions. MOTION: Moved by Edstrom, seconded by Redpath, to close the public hearing and to adopt Resolution No. 81-56, granting the request for Municipal Indus- trail Development Bonds in the amount of $350,000 for S & D Properties. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen, and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 5574 - 5788 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to approve Payment of Claims Nos. 5574 - 5788. Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen and Penzel voted "aye" on all claims. Motion carried unanimously. VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS A. Hwy. 169-212 Task Force - discussion on the official Hwy. 169/212 map. Sidney Pauly, Task Force member, introduced: Patrick Murphy, Carver County Director of Public Works and Task Force member; Ghaleb Abdul- Rahman, Staff person, Metropolitan Council; Don Peterson, resident of Eden Prairie and Task Force member; William Crawford, Mn/DOT District V Engineer; and R.H. Paine, Mn/DOT District V Project Manager. /53 City Council Minutes -5- March 17, 1981 Murphy explained the history of the 169/212 Task Force and what the procedure will be from this point on. He said that this is only the first step in defining the corridor. The 'Scoping Report', completed in early 1980, documents the process the Citizen's Advisory Committee went through. The Task Force is seeking to narrow down the alignment to, they hope, one of the lines shown on the map. Decisions on this will be made via Public Hearings held by the City Council's in each of the cities and this will be done in a few months. Abdul-Rahman described the role of the Metropolitan Council in the process. He also spoke about a bill which has been introduced by Schreiber which would assist municipalities in purchasing right-of-way which has been desig- nated necessary by the State Highway Department,but for which they do not have funds. These funds would be administered by the Metropolitan Council and the legislation would only apply to the 7-County Metropolitan Area. The State would then have five years in which to purchase the land from the munici- pality. If this right were not exercised, the municipality could then sell the right-of-way at the current market rate and return the money to the Metro- politan Council. Bentley asked if this would, in effect, give the Metropolitan Council taxing authority. Abdul-Rahman said it would give them .001 mill. Crawford said that the time has come to either protect the corridor or forget the project. While commitments cannot be made for a large project, scaling it down to a two lane highway with right-of-way for four lanes with at grade crossings would make it feasible. We should attempt to get what we can now as we are competing state-wide for federal aid primary dollars. Peterson explained that the "System D" corridor has been the adopted route since 1968. The right-of-way through this area would be relatively inexpensive to acquire -- especially west of County Road 4 where much of the land is un- developed. He spoke of the impact on the residential area and school of the routes which would follow the Highway 5 alignment to the Chicago and Northwester, railroad and then proceed south. • Mrs. Pauly stated that the committee appeared before the School Board and that the 8oard seemed to prefer the "System D" route. Murphy said that it is hoped Public Hearings can be held by the Task Force in early Fall. Penzel asked Crawford which alignment would be easier to accomplish from the standpoint of corridor preservation and the environment. Crawford said the School Addition option would be the one he would recommend as the one which would be easier to obtain. Penzel questioned whether or not Highway 5 would be upgraded pending the construction of a new 212. Crawford said that Highway 5 would not be more that a high-type urban arterial -- eventually 4-lane divided highway with right and left turn lanes. It cannot be developed into a divided expressway or freeway. -15y • City Council Minutes -6- March 17, 1981 Bentley questioned what would be accomplished by a 2-lane Highway 212. Crawford stated that a 2-lane 212 would get heavy truck traffic off of t. Highway 5. Also, if the right-of-way were purchased for a 4-lane highway, that could be built at some future date. Peterson explained that the homeowners in School Addition preferred the alignment following the Industrial route along Highway 5. William Sando, District 16 Representative on the Metropolitan Council, stated that he supports the Schreiber bill which Abdul-Rahman addressed. Tangen expressed concern about the spaghetti bowl effect and the environmental impact on the eastern most portion of the route -- that in the Purgatory Creek area/Schooner Boulevard area. After discussion the consensus was that there would be less of an environmental impact on the eastern end if the Industrial or Residential route were followed. Vicki Koenig, 7239 Topview Road, addressed the environmental impact on the Purgatory Creek area and expressed her concerns in this regard. Frank Kiesner, Magnetic Controls' representative, said he felt there were two main issues -- 1) which corridor is best? This issue takes into account ecological issues and cost issues. 2) should the Council preserve a corridor? This involves the cost of preserving a corridor -- the loss of industry and jobs. Mrs. Pauly stated that there are 5 - 6 fatalities each year on Highway 5 and ( on Highway 169. At one time the City was paying $40,000 a year in man-hours spent by Public Safety on accidents. Dean Scheff, Chairman and Founder of CPT, spoke to the proposed right-of-way and his concerns. John Houston, Red Rock Hills Developer, would like to see a corridor pinned down. Tangen stated that he would not be at the April 7, 1981, Council Meeting and wished to go on record as being against any proposal which would not allow the expansion and/or development of CPT, MTS, and MCC. Edstrom asked to hear from interested parties prior to the April 7th meeting. MOTION: Bentley raved, seconded by Redpath, to have the Staff compile the pros and cons of the two proposed alternatives between the existing 4-lane section of County Road 5 and County Road 4 - the impact both from the stand- point of cost and potential uses of the land, the environmental impact; the staging as far as an interim improvement might be accomplished by the State; & the legal implications of the Schreiber bill. This information to be available for the April 7, 1981, City Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. -156 City Council Minutes -7- March 17, 1981 VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Request from M. C. Carmody of T.G.C. Oevelopment Corp., to withdraw Oeer Creek Addition preliminary plat and 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 80-19 given on August 5, 1980, and request for additional units to be served from Mitchell Road alone. Mike Carmody, T.G.C. Corporation, spoke to the request to withdraw the original proposal so that a new proposal might be presented in the near future. Oiscussion centered on the construction of Anderson Lakes Parkway within the proposed development. MOTION: Moved by Redpath, seconded by Edstrom, to accept the proponents withdrawal of the preliminary plat and 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 80-19 and agreed that future development would included the provision for Ander- son Lakes Parkway within the boundaries of the proposal. Motion carried unanimously. Bentley and Penzel requested that Staff prepare a Status Report of pro- perties between Anderson Lakes Parkway and Scenic Heights Road and a time table as to when Mitchell Road might have to be upgraded north of Scenic Heights Road. This report to be available for the April 7, 1981, meeting. VIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS • A. Report of Council Members Edstrom called attention to an April 1, 1981, meeting of the Waste Management Board Hazardous Waste Citizen's Meeting to be held at 8 P.M. at Minnetonka City Hall. Gene Schuman, George Bentley, and Oean Edstrom will attend the meeting. Edstrom advised the Council that he will be late for the April 7,• 1981, Council Meeting. Penzel called attention to the Special Council Meeting which will be held on March 23, 1981, at which time local candidates for City Manager will be re-interviewed. • B. Report of City Attorney Rick Rosow spoke to the Metropolitan Council's request to have Riley Lake Park designated a Regional Park. MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Bentley, to request the Metropolitan Council to adjust its Systems Park Plan to delete Riley Lake from the Regional Park System. Motion carried with Redpath voting "no". • City Council Minutes -8- March 17, 1981 C. Report of Acting City Manager 1. Approval of bids for fixtures for liquor store Acting City Manager Frane recommended the approval of Display Fix- ture's bid of $33,253 for coolers, shelving and miscellaneous fix- tures for the liquor store at the Preserve Village Center. MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Redpath, to accept Display Fix- ture's bid of $33,253 for coolers, shelving, and miscellaneous fix- tures for the Preserve Village Center liquor store. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen, and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. Acting City Manager Frane explained that Minnesota Cash Register is the only supplier which has cash registers which are compatible with our present computer system. In order to integrate the cash registers with the computer system for inventory control and reporting purposes it is recommended to accept their quote of $5,454 for each cash register. MOTION: Moved by Bentley, seconded by Tangen, to accept the quote of Minnesota Cash Register of $5,454 for each of two cash registers for the liquor store at the Preserve Village Center. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen, and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. ( D. Report of Planning Director • 1. Section 8 Existing Rent Assistance Program MOTION: Moved by Redpath, seconded by Bentley, to adopt Resolution No. 8I-67, authorizing the Metropolitan Council to apply for Housing Assistance Funds for implementation within the City of Eden Prairie. Motion carried unanimously. E. Report of City Engineer 1. Receive feasibility report for improvements on Bennett Place,I.C. 51-375 (Resolution No. 81-59) - moved to Consent Calendar as item III.L. 2. Approve Hennepin County preliminary plans for improvements on Co. Rd. 4 at Valley View Road, I.C. 51-325 IV (Resolution No. 81-60) - moved to Consent Calendar as item III. M. IX. NEW BUSINESS There was none. X. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Redpath, seconded by Edstrom, to adjourn the meeting at 10:59 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. iK1 ,.5/17/3! C ..A.1 - e0144 .4N.Ce. ;�.� ..GUt , a ce ..fit .Z1 ..0 (.z..0 a_,..i G402.) Izenciy0 otJ v a-y)2,ecryse422e-K-1....1 _. W.."41 -h ..f9-e O4 J t fu4..4.2LJ�, J arc ..6VOtte co/A6---"4.-cc.� Cc /€•��,r cam- 4f,t s' 27,exp z� 0.) W..e x1.0 ✓n of.,uzoti., . ILead 6.c,e.r�f�q..coo ,A c.. ..C.e...z.e. 4 ..Ci.)rn� r . a O ..,au J • • -e % JZ ,LAC CG2 . -'Gh:c,)241 ...- cT CJ c-a --e C , /4/So � L ,fie% f/ • • 159 • MINUTES JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION { Monday, March 23, 1981 Unapproved 6:30 PM, City Hall CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: • Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, • Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath, George Tangen COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chairman William Bearman, Liz Retterath, Matthew Levitt, Grant Sutliff, Hakon Torjesen, Virginia Gartner, Robert Hallett STAFF PRESENT: Chris Enger, Director of Planning; John Frane, Acting City Manager; Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services; Carl Jullie, City Engineer; Keith Wall, Public Safety; Bob Tyson I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Planning Commission Chairman Bearman called the meeting to order explaining that the topic of the meeting,as the agenda stated, was to discuss site alternatives for location of City Services. II. PRESENTATION FROM CITY STAFF OF SITE SELECTION CRITERIA FOR CITY SERVICES COMPLEX City Planner, Chris Enger introduced staff members present to explain the pros and cons of locating at the existing City Hall site compared to a site near the Major Center Area. Keith Wall explained that the Crime Prevention aspect of a Public Safety Building would be located equally well at either site, because of the fact that most di- spatches of vehicles were from points in the field rather than from a central point. However, he explained that the next fire station for the City should be in a location that would serve the Southwest area of town. Growth would begin to occur west of Co. Rd. 4 once a new sewer trunk was extended, and there would be a need for an additional fire station which could also cover the Airport. • Placement of the Public Safety building at the Co. Rd. 4 site would assure that the fire station would be adequately manned by volunteers from the Public Safety Department. If Public Works also located at the Co. Rd. 4 site, it would provide a convenient point for serving Public Safety vehicles and also be a source of additional fire vol unteers. Wall explained that good access to Co. Rd. 4 and Co. Rd. 1 would also provide direct access to the major residential population areas of town. Wall felt, that other than the fire station question, the sites were equal; the advantages of locating a police and fire public safety building at the Co. Rd. 4 site make it better from a public safety stand point. } -76v 1 City Council/Planning Unapproved Commission Minutes -2- March 23, 1981 Wall was asked when Public Safety would need new facilities. He replied that, with the addition to the water treatment plant, where their existing facilities are, next year they would need new quarters. Bob Lambert explained that the Park and Recreation Shop needed to be located centrally in accessibility to City Parks. He illustrated that Bryant Lake Park and Anderson Lakes Park, in the northeast area of the community would be main- tained by the County. The City Parks, were therefore mainly located on either side of Co. Rd. 4 or Co. Rd. 1, and were most easily accessible with maintenance equip- ment from those roads. He mentioned a need for outside storage which could be screened at the Co. Rd. 4 site but would be more difficult for higher residential buildings in the M.C.A. Mr. Lambert felt that the existing City Hall site was best for location of a park shop. Carl Jullie presented the advantages of both sites. He explained that the geographic center of town was not the residential population and access center of town. Public Works would be concerned with providing street and utility mainten- ance services in town. The density of water, sewer, street, and storm sewer services in a residential area was many times greater than in a commercial/in- dustrial area, such as the Major Center Area and the Smetana Lake Industrial area. Therefore, from a Public Works standpoint, the site at Co. Rd. 4 pro- vided a more central location to existing and future service areas than a Major Center site. Mr. Jullie went on to compare the screening possibilities for outside storage, explaining that the Co. Rd. 4 site had excellent topographic features which could be utilized to screen required outside storage. Mr. Jullie explained that the site on Co. Rd. 4 and Co. Rd. 1 would provide good high capacity roads for access to all parts of the community without having to utilize City Collector Roads as in the M.C.A. site. Chris Enger explained that a site in the M.C.A. was a correct land use. He presented the 1968 Guide Plan which showed a commercial corner at Co. Rd. 1 and Co. Rd. 4 and the 1979 Guide Plan which showed City Services and a park at the existing City Hall site. While he had concerns about being a compatible land use with outside storage in the M.C.A., because of the difficulty of screening, he felt outside storage at the Co. Rd. 4 site could be screened very well. He went on to explain that the cemetary and a park would be to the north, Rural land with future residential to the west and Rural land with future possible neighborhood commercial use to the south and Co. Rd. 4 and existing large lot residential to the east. Mr. Enger also felt the Co. Rd. 4 site would be the closest to the crossroads of the residential population. Mr. Enger gave a brief summary and the meeting was adjourned at 7:30 PM. 16/1 UNAPPROVED MINUTES (. SPECIAL EOEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING • • MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1981 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath, and George Tangen The special meeting of the Eden Prairie City Council was called to order by Mayor Penzel. The purpose of the meeting was to re-interview three local finalists for City Manager. Interviewed were: 7:30 p.m. Patrick McGarvey 8:30 p.m. Carl Jullie 9:30 p.m. Michael McGuire Ten hypothetical emergencies were posed to each candidate. The Council then used the responses to these questions in further evaluating each candidate. MOTION: Moved by Edstrom, seconded by Tangen, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried unanimously. ',,(,o^ ) ,/ :, f f UNAPPROVED MINUTES SPECIAL EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, MARCH 30, 1981 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Dean Edstrom, Paul Redpath, and George Tangen The special meeting of the Eden Prairie City Council was called to order by Mayor P ze !._ ,Ov*- UC t2#..& Bob E ers, Ellers.and Associa S; reported on re}aitig-•to road consiructi.on--finaneing._ ,.. .1�- .w�-� , 'B11 McGrann, Dick Graves, Jim Reyer, and Wally Parkins repreventing the O'Connor & Hannan law firm made a proposal to the Council regardingpplan-the, t-mt3� .um—in—tax increment financing..'€..,.... �""*�• MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to retain the firm of O'Connor & Hannan for services in the area of tax increment financing. The meeting was recessed for a meeting of the Housing & Redevelopment Authority. The Council reconvened its meeting to consider the attributes of the four candidates for City Manager. A lengthy discussion ensued on the merits of each. it was decided ( to make the official appointment at the April 7, 1981, Council meeting to allow time for terms of employment to be reached. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to adjourn the meeting at 10:35 p.m. . Motion carried unanimously. • t(It '163 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICNESE APPLICATION LIST April 7, 1981 CDNTRACTOR (Multi & Comm.) FOOD HANDLERS TYPE A Franklin Construction Co., Inc. Canteen Co. of Minn. MTS Knutson Construction Co. Country Kitchen Powers Dept. Store CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 Family) •FOOD HANDLERS TYPE B • Brolsma Construction George R. Butler Construction Eden Inn Kee Construction, Inc. Klink Construction, Inc. FOOD HANDLERS TYPE C Roger Sandberg Builders, Inc. Ten-Red, Inc. Taco's Plus Paul Walentiny Construction Valley Plumbing VENDING MACHINES (Food) GAS FITTER Jimmy Jingle Cedar Valley Heating & Mr Conditioning RETAIL CANDY OUTLET Grendahl Mechanical, Inc. Country Kitchen ( HEATING & VENTILATING Powers Dept. Store Cedar Valley Heating & Air Conditioning PRIVATE KENNEL LICENSE Grendahl Mechanical, Inc. Theresa Elliott PLUMBING L. Guy Schoenecker Russ Anderson Plumbing REFUSE COLLECTOR Conner Plumbing Grendahl Mechanical, Inc. Waste Technology Thoen Plumbing PEDDLERS LICENSE UTILITY INSTALLER Waste Technology & Renter, Inc. Grendahl Mechanical, Inc. Larson Excavating, Inc. WELL DRILLING Valley Plumbing • Associated Well Drillers CIGARETTES & TOBACCO SUNDAY LIQUOR Jimmy Jingle, Inc. Mark's Eden Prairie Standard Eden Prairie Steak Associates (Mr. Steak) { • • • 'April 7, 1981 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • `• RESOLUTION NO. 81-70 • • • A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF MAPLE LEAF ACRES 9TH ADDITION • WHEREAS, the plat of Maple Leaf Acres 9th Addition has been sub • . mitted in the'manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and • WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and •. the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordin- ances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: • A. Plat Approval Request for Maple Leaf Acres 9th Addition is approved upon compliance with the. recomnendation of the City Engineer's Report on this plat dated April 1, 1981. f B. Variance is herein granted from City Ordinance No. 93, Sec. 8, Subd. 1 waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final • plat as described, in said Engineer's Report. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Regis • - trar of Titles for thier use as required by M5A 462.358, Subd. 3. D. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named • plat. E. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon can- pliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • • John D. Frane, Clerk • CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: John Frane, Acting City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer OATE: April 1, 1981 • • SUBJECT: Maple Leaf Acres 9th Addition PROPOSAL: The developers, Jarip Corporation, have requested City Council approval of the final plat of Maple Leaf Acres 9th Addition. The plat consists of 4 single family lots, 5 outlots and dedication of right-of-way for Valley View and Dell Roads. Outlot A will be dedicated to the City for open space use. Outlots B, C, D and E will be platted at a later date in conformance with the approved preliminary plat. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved on September 6, 1977, per Council Resolution #77-97. Zoning to R1-135 was finally read and approved on November 11, 1977, per Ordinance #77-28. The Rezoning Agreement referred to within this report was executed on November 11, 1977. VARIANCES: In addition to lot size variances granted through the Rezoning Agreement, a variance from City Ordinance #93, Sec. 8, Subd. 1, waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be necessary. All other variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Utilities and roadways will be installed on Valley. View Road and Dell Road through the Improvement Contract 51-325 currently in process. Part of the cost of installing these improve- ments will be assessed to benefitting properties. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Rezoning Agreement. BONDING: Bonding for the construction of utilities and roadways will not be required for this addition. • The pro-rated bond or letter of credit in the amount of $3,864.00, based on $966 per lot for the construction of Dell Road and Valley View Road, will be required upon release of the final plat. /6/ - 2 - f RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Maple Leaf Acres 9th Addition, subject to the requirements of this report, the Rezoning Agreement and the following; 1. Receipt of fee for City Engineering services in the amount of $120.00. 2. Receipt of cash deposit for street lighting in the amount of $244.70. 3. Receipt of pro-rate amount of $3,864.00. • • • • April 7, 1981 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. R81-71 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVER- TISEMENT FOR BIDS (I.C. 51-341A) WHEREAS, the City Engineer, through RCM, Inc., has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvement, to wit, 1.C. 51-341A, Traffic signals at T.H. 169/ Anderson Lakes Parkway and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The adver- tisement shall be published for 2 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened at 10:00 o'clock A.M. on Thursday, May 7, 1981, and con- sidered by the Council at 7:30 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, May 19, 1981, in the Council Chambers of the City. Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on • • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • 7b • April 7. 1981 ( CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • • RESOLUTION NO. R81-7.6 • • RESOLUTION APPROVING TRAFFIC SIGNAL AGREEMENT NO. 6037.5M BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of•Eden Prairie enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Oepartment of Transportation for the following purposes, to-wit: To provide a temporary traffic control signal with street light on Trunk Highway No. 169 at Anderson Lakes Parkway in accordance with the terms and . conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 60375M, a copy of which was before the • Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. AOOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • • • �G9 • MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT NO. 60375M • BETWEEN • THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA FOR • Installation of a Temporary Traffic Control Signal with Street Light on Trunk Highway No. 169 at Anderson Lakes Parkway in Eden Prairie, Minnesota. • S.P. 2744-39 Prepared by Traffic Engineering ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE AMOUNT ENCUMBERED None None 77U • • THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinaf- ter referred to as the "State", and the City of Eden Prairie, hereinafter referred to as the "City", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City desires that a temporary traffic control signal with street light be installed on Trunk Highway No. 169 at Anderson Lakes Parkway in the City; and WHEREAS, the City and the State will participate in the installation, maintenance and operation of said temporary traffic control signal as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The State shall prepare the necessary plan and specifications and shall assist in the performance of the con- struction engineering and inspection work and shall provide certain equipment and materials to the City. 2. The City shall duly award a contract to the lowest responsible bidder to install a temporary traffic con- trol signal with street light at the intersection of Trunk • Highway No. 169 at Anderson Lakes Parkway in accordance with the plan and specifications provided by the State and identified as State Project No. 2744-39. • 3. The City shall install or cause the installation of an adequate electrical power supply to the service pole including any necessary extensions of power lines, and upon completion of said traffic control signal with street light 60375M -1- t installation shall provide necessary electrical power for its operation at the cost and expense of the City. 4. Upon completion of the work contemplated herein, • the State shall maintain and keep in repair the traffic control signal, except for relamping, cleaning and painting at its cost and expense; and the City shall relamp, clean and paint the signal and shall maintain the street light at the cost and ex- pense of the City. 5. The cost to the parties hereto for the work provided for herein is considered equal and no charge will be made by either party to the other therefor. 6. The City indemnifies, saves, and holds harmless the State and all of its agents and employees of and from any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of action of whatso- ever nature or character arising out of, or by reason of, the performance of any work by the City provided for hereby, and further agrees to defend, without cost or expense to the State, its agents or employees, any action or proceeding commenced for • the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising in connection with or by virtue of the work to be per- formed by the City. 7. All timing of all traffic control signals provided for herein shall be determined by the State, through its commissioner of Transportation, and no changes shall be made therein except with the approval of the State. 60375M -2- T?2 • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE APPROVED AS TO FORM: • By City Attorney • Mayor (City Seal) By City Manager • STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION . By • District Engineer Assistant Commissioner Operations Division Dated APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION: DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION By Special Assistant Attorney General - State of Minnesota Dated • r 1 l 60375M -3- • April 7, 1981 • Igreement No. 60376 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • • RESOLUTION NO. RB1-72 • RESOLUTION APPROVING MN/DOT AGREEMENT NO. 60376 FOR RAILROAD CROSSING SIGNALS ON VALLEY VIEW RD. WEST OF RDUND LAKE • BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Eden Prairie enter int an Agreement with Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company and the Commissioner of Transportation for the installation and maintenance of railroad crossing signals at the intersection of Valley View Road with the tracks of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company in Eden Prairie, Minnesota, and appointing the Commissioner of Transportation agent for the City to supervise said project and administer available Federal Funds in accordance with Minnesota Statute, Seciton 151.35 (1g80). The City's share of the cost shall be 10 percent of the total cost. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Clerk be and they are hereby authorized to execute said agreement for and on behalf of the City. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL 1 • John D. Frane, Clerk • 17g • • AGREEMENT NO. 60376 • DATED: S.P. 27-00154 Minn. Proj. RRO RRP 000S(7) Railroad Crossing Signals Valley View Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota • CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL $ PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY HENNEPIN COUNTY AGENCY FUNDS THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF EDEN • PRAIRIE, hereinafter called the "City", RICHARD B. OGILVIE, AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL $ PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, DEBTOR, hereinafter•called the "Company", and the COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE OF MINNESOTA, hereinafter called the "State", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration, when acting in cooperation with the Transportation Department of the State of Minnesota, is authorized by Act of Congress to make Federal Aid available for the purpose of eliminating hazards at railroad grade crossings within the State of.Minnesota; and • WHEREAS, the State, pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Section 161.36 (1980), is authorized to cooperate with the United States Government in supervising improvements of public highways within the State of Minnesota not included in the trunk highway system, and to act in disbursing and accounting for Federal • Funds in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, Valley View Road, as now.established, crosses the track of the Company at grade in Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesota, the location of said crossing and railway track being shown on the print hereto attached, . marked Exhibit "B", and herein referred to and made a part of this agreement; and . - WHEREAS, the City and the Company desire that this grade crossing be protected by railroad crossing signals, flashing light type with gates , and AGREEMENT NO. 60376 the Company is willing to install, maintain and operate such signals upon the terms and conditions hereinafter stated; NOW, THEN, IT IS AGREED: • 1. The State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, "Standard Clauses for Railway Highway Agreements", dated September 1, 1980, is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and hereinafter referred to as "Standard Clauses". Except as hereinafter expressly modified, all of the terms and conditions set forth in the "Standard Clauses" are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement with the same force and effect as though fully set forth therein. Standard Clauses Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8a, 10 and 11 are deleted from this agreement. ' 2. The Company shall furnish all material for and with its regularly employed forces install a complete railroad crossing signal system on Valley View Road, as indicated on attached plan marked Exhibit "B". The placement of ' the signals shall be in accordance with Part VIII of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Detailed plans, specifications and the work to be done shall be subject to the approval of the Department of Transportation of the State of Minnesota. Work of installing this signal system shall be prosecuted so as to be completed within 12 months after the date the Company is authorized to begin • work. If the Company shall determine it impossible to complete the work within the period herein specified, it shall make a written request to the State for an extension of time for completion, setting forth therein the reason for such extension. - 2 eie)10 AGREEMENT NO. 60376 3. The actual costs of the project herein contemplated, including pre- liminary engineering costs, are to be financed with 90% Federal Funds and 10% j • City of Eden Prairie Funds. The State and City will reimburse the Company as provided herein for only such items of work and expense as are proper and • eligible for payment with Federal Funds. Only materials actually incorporated into the project will be eligible for Federal reimbursement. t. The State's 90% portion (reimbursable with Federal Funds) will be paid to the Company in accordance with Article 9 of the Standard Clauses, Exhibit "A". The City's 10% portion will be paid to the Company when the project has been completed and the Final Bill has been approved by the State. It is understood that the following estimate is for informational purposes 'ly. The estimated cost of the work to be done by the Company hereunder with its own equipment and regularly employed forces and in accordance with the Company's agreements with such regularly employed forces is as follows and in • further accordance with detailed estimate attached hereto and marked Exhibit j "C". ii1 • Material • $32,413.00 I) Labor (Including Additives) $26,151.00 • i. Contingencies . $ 5,836.00 .i TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $64,400.00 Portion of costs allocated to • City of Eden Prairie (10% of actual cost.) $ 6,440.00 Reimbursable with Federal Funds $57,960.00 I( - 3 - �� AGREEMENT NO. 60376 .1 4. In the event it is determined that a change from the foregoing statement of work to be performed by the Company is required, it shall be • authorized only by a written change or extra work order.issued by the State . prior to the performance of the work involved in the change. 5. The said grade crossing signal system shall be maintained and operated by the Company upon completion of its installation, but this said obligation to maintain said signal system shall continue in accordance with the law of ' the State as it shall be from time to time in the future. 6. The signal system shall not be removed unless there has been a determination that said signals are no longer required at this location. If the signals are to be removed, the Company upon request of the State shall -install it at some other crossing within the State on the Company's tracks. , The location and division of cost of such relocation shall be agreed upon between the Company and the State prior to such removal. In the event that either railway or highway improvements will necessitate a rearrangement of the signals at said crossing, the party whose improvement AI " causes said changes will bear the entire cost of the same without obligation 1. • i to the other. 7. This agreement is binding on Richard B. Ogilvie, not as an individual, but solely in his capacity as Trustee. • 'ii • S � , - 4 �0 la d _April 7, 1981 • State Project 2744-3- (169=5) Fed. Project F005-2 (61) • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. R81- 74 • • RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR PERMANENT TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND CHAN- _NELIZATION AT T.H. 169/CO. RD. 1 • WHEREAS,. the Commissioner of Transportation for the State of Minnesota has prepared plans, special provisions and specifications for the improvement of Trunk Highway No. 5, renumbered as Trunk Highway No. 169, within the corporate limits of the City of Eden Prairie, from 2817 ft. south of C.S.A.H. 1 to 1863 ft. north of C.S.A.H. 1 and seeks the approval thereof; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said plans and special provisions for the improvement of said Trunk HIghway within said corporate limits of the City, be and hereby are approved including the elevations and grades as shown and consent is hereby given to any and all changes in grade occasioned by said construction. BE IT FURNTER RESOLVED that the City does hereby agree to require the parking of all vehicles, if such parking is permitted within the cor- porate limits of said City, on said Trunk Highway, to be parallel with the curb adjacent to the highway, and at least 20 feet from any crosswalks on all.public streets intersecting said Trunk Highway. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • • 7)9 • Lake Heights Addition RAP CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • ORDINANCE NO. 79-04 • AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND • AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 135 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended as follows: (a) The property, as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof, shall be and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the PM 6.5 District. (b) The property, as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof, shall be and hereby is removed from the Rural • District and shall be included hereafter in the R1-13.5 District. Section 2. The above described property shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agree- 4. ment dated as of , 19 , entered into between Universal Land Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement is hereby made a part hereof and shall further be subject to all ordin- ances, (. rules and regulations of the City of Eden Prairie relating to the District in which it shall be included hereafter. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. If -2- FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 6 day of February , 19 79 , and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 19_ E Wolfgang H. Penzel - Mayor (SEAL) • ATTEST: John D. Frane - City Clerk +!!� PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 19 1�1 _ • 5=12-80 Lake Heights Addition •DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1980 ti by and between UNIVERSAL LAND CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Owner", and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City". • WITNESSETH: • WHEREAS, Owner has applied to City to rezone from Rural to RM 6.5 and R1-13.5 approximately 22 acres, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof and hereafter referred to as "the property", and WHEREAS, Owner desires to develop and plat the property for construction thereon 29 single family homes and 32 townhouses. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance 79-04, Owner covenants and agrees to construction upon, development; and maintenance of said property as follows: • 1. Owner shall plat and develop the property in conformance with the material dated Jan. 9, 1979 reviewed and approved by the City Council on Feb. 6, 1979 and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. Owner shall not develop the property in any other respect or manner than contained herein. 2. Owner covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Owner• at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. Owner shell , concurrently herewith, convey to the City Outlot A, • Lake Eden, according to the plat on file and of record, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Owner shall not, or permit any other person to grade or construct any structure upon Outlot A. • 4. Omer shall plat that part of Preserve Boulevard within the property 50 feet wide. • • { • • 4 Developer's Agreement-Lake Heights Addition page 2 • • 5. Owner shall petition City for the following improvements: A. 5 foot wide 5 inch deep concrete sidewalk within the right of way and east of the driving surface of Homeward Hills Road abutting the property as depicted in red on Exhibit B. • B. Construction of that portion of Preserve Boulevard which abuts the property with a 28 foot hard surface within a • 50 foot right of way according to City standards. 6. Owner shall not design or construct any driveway connecting or permitting access to any lot within the property with or from Anderson Lakes Parkway or Homeward Hills Road. • 7. Owner shall not construct any structure closer than 50 feet from { Anderson Lakes Parkway or Homeward Hills Road. • 8. Owner agrees that the assessments for sewer and water construction • costs within that part of Homeward Hills Road abutting the western side of the property may be levied against the property. 9. Owner shall post 1 sign along the south side of Anderson Lakes Parkway and 1 sign along the west side of Preserve Boulevard in locations depicted on Exhibit B, informing the public of future multiple residential development.The signs must be approved by the Planning Department and in place prior to issuance of any building permit. • • • j • '7?3 Developer's Agreement-Lake Heights Addition page 3 • IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties to this Agreement have caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year aforesaid. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a Municipal corporation • of the State of Minnesota BY: Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor BY: STATE OF MINNESOTA) Roger K. Ulstad, Manager )SS. • COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,1980 by Wolfgang H. Penzel, the Mayor and Roger K. Ulstad, the City Manager of the City on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public OWNER • UNIVERSAL LAND CORPORATION, a Minnesota Corpor i the \ Qi 4(1) AMP STATE OF MINNESOTA) lie GLi CtS.0 '--� )SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this`C l ay of �.. ,1980 by L.(-- vvt.im. the '1 C i i" t:.c �►(� G �` and.IW�.—��!y[ the 1 ED of Universal Land Corporation on behalf jthe i.11p.ation. Notyrry Pub icl 7�U • • LAKE HEIGHTS ADDITION LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: Portion to be zoned RM 6.5 That portion of Outlot R, Lake Eden, lying North of the following described line: • Commencing at the Northeast corner of Outlot R, thence Southeasterly along the Northwest line of Outlot R, a distance of 625' Southwesterly to the point of beginning, thence S 69'42'03" E a distance of 180' , thence S 44°42' 03" E a distance of 200 ', thence N 35000'00" E approximately 200 ' to the East line of Outlot R and there terminating; and That portion of Outlot R lying Westerly of a line drawn parallel to and 250' east of the East line of the North ' of the South' of the Northwest 1 of Section 23 and Northerly of a line drawn parallel to and 250 ' Northerly of the South line of the NM; of Section 23. Portion to be zoned RI-13.5 That part of Outlot R, Lake Eden,Except the above described portions. • EXHIBIT A Lake Heights Addition Developer's Agreement • 716 1 .,.. .•• .1,4.111• • ........„:•'• • '•••,-"7.'''' '''7,,77-, I i;: , ••:-..t--- . . •....7..- •••••...;::' ••• ''•01"-• . , I 1 i i ..-:"....:. : •-...• ...... -t, •ii / I ' I •••As r.---1..• • I tit ,,,;.,- ,.....„..........:....... .,,• , . •...,.., ... . ,..,:„; ...„ . ,,,,, •:. ••• ..1.••••••s\c"'..:a. -1.-1: li !I.!, !il ...—f—it.. ... .....;•1•,:s. ‘,.... !,/' !I., ::. .,Z; ‘. f. • -.. . ''' i.01 i..... 1 1 .. ,,,.., ...7"z, ii' .•,.. i . . • .., \, •I I lit,I, ',, ,) / .;.., .-!..,si 1.! i', ii • i ; - - , • ; it..., \.if?,...;.k , '/4 ' V..... I.-1... 1• .4 // il t. (- . t.t!.: t r: . . \ '‘ t , .... :iI i... I to II It::/ (.„1.. .‘ 0i 1 • / i • , ____. .. ,.; • ;,-; •\\ 'I.'. ... "' 1. al il la i/ I 0 I .. * '• 's, .., 114' ....' 1'i I •') LI , ,%/:,•.„ i C.— _••,. isi./,' . I '' -): i Iii ,./....//:- i f.---1...3 /I i ,•, ./ • • *;:,`i;; i:', i \,,' W," /...•1-1.4. ,-',4 '''' ),'....C. .• ...cri. . ' • • • : 1i r .4 ! I:: !; ,\., is- 1--f.• •--7-----4.-•„:1.._.1 ''0.1-.111.• ,-.. ••••.. / .: • . . - : ii, ij:;•‘; !L".!•• i ii4,•....---7-------51 • •I: . •• •• • • :i• t. 2•.- ,• ! 1; .•% it I/ /•:"'',1,:.••\...:_:. . ,:„_.„,_. I,:.; t ..1 / I IL '::::;•-,-:. 1 ;.-li -`.1.1.'. .. ,: . . i \:. .7'. I tl I -r,•'.';''T I"---/,.''' l' r. i': !.1 • .I. -'•'' •`‘ ' I • . .1 a i .. , . ' • .1.7:Ix11711--.,e-A.S--'-/4-.:.'',,) .1,. ,,,/ 1 /; ",..I. ./.. ,,' - .. . - ....• I.,.a.......-_,z\.,, .4.:_o!'I .i..,) -C.-.• i_.7:.‘,. i:,.., /1/I/Itvil..-...1../..,•• • ".".--•12)-I--\ .1-1/ Is '.. ri.II I.'" ./ I. •".--- _/' .. . • ...---•I.--.::Itti\:..r Onit . ' I 1-1, , .c t 5i:3, .,..... ' • ..__. .. i • ...- -, 1 1, •-:•,! •/ f--_-] 1. /.... ,\...1:',0-- : ...... . „ :1 i: i f ...._ " -• . • • . 1 ...._.-- i ts!-1.,I-, %\. i ti•;-. . , .1._11/ •,-TC::.',-Qci...... ' - '.'. -----%;?: •,s,,,,, , '..\• ;-. in.\- _ - ,.:..- . ., ... • . • ;:,:-. -..,... s •--, i • '.•?!.I'-'V i•:, - - • te'''''''' t ,.'' v. .. . ' .7.•-- '‘.3\\ "1-7\\4:I.t)'IA S311:"...' r''''.....'...--ri ''il. ....1............1.A:' \..;.....:.' . , ,. .c....„,‘;',..fi,i..,,,'•.---.4r ; A: -I ''-' . •'Ik.' . \ t-•"..---- t • . tr. ..'.1 .i. I•11. • ,,. t • .. . - • k 10) I . . . . . .•.....,t, i I‘I,! : ! : , i•• \•tp \ : ....., t g.,.'rt. IA:LI. V 1 11 . :.• ' . t. "I' e , A ........ ..• ', i, ‘.L,:y I :!,..,71,1.: ,I ,,,,•,,,., „1.. h •c , . ‘ ..ca \ • ...--;. '.);fst) 4'14 i , .. -114ILI ; '•': r) ii . .".., .1•i.l; ' ,•,0 I, • 1: ' ' ' ; •••I, '\ ‘\\‘..: \ • . .'..:.. '..• , ,'“••-• /:•—Pt;'Y 14,-:,__ , •: , , (..„ •••_ .. . : •,••i ;e 1 ••I!, ,• Ii.i... III: i Aa.a, ..--, i.n ‘, '\' — •-•'-' ?., .riy /..),-t.ii..., ,,,::• , .,, .. • 1 \\. s‘x \ • • ••—•—: .:*' t.1-)'1 1-',14-y. • • • ,s, .., •. ,,...• ;..); t.t ! . ..T. ; •• 1,1 i St • %- .0 Signs for future .-- - :7- ,-,1.' ', ,irpi, 1-.-_,--.Li.- .. i .-.•multiple i ‘,.. ••:.... .111 :.• ;ii.i:',.., ,:....f._ • .:: 'f,'•;..., i \`‘. • ',.. ••• - . . iYI; Ill • i LLI.. ‘--:-'. ' : ,....'- `, • 1 \•.•. :•: - - -5'5" concrete ,,•--,zl*:_:: - •-- I. .•)--,;4--\...-•••• .1.--;.--:1.:.', S.;:";\ '. c i sidewalk -;—•' , .•• • '. 1:;!. : 111‘.4 ..1. \.-- arz I 1 I.:- ,- 1, -- - : % ! • .'\• -.; t,.. 1.,,_I I I. . i. ., - .,...,/I IJ.., ? i .. • ,' ' / ' .'a'..' ' !!! '7'.--• ?,' I i..1 C.4.1 4..: . . ..,.. ' ' 1 1'.‘,• • II.1.',kt .?' : 't..i: .. 1.1 . . ..:' , ..... ' ". ._" i'I'.,1 '''. 1:i. . ." , ' ."...". I . / % " '• :. . 'F. I.I. f' ; ':' '• ', •• -• '. • „/,,,,1 ,/ : ki‘ -• ' '. i / , 1. . '•• ‘ / ( :;. o , ' • a c• ., : . : .a . ../..: i • ; , I a, 'I If V A J'I 111;li :,3 Alil s / •, a;: i' . .•:i;..1 .ii:1 ••• ..t,1.‘ ::::(: / ....,• ••• ; ' -':''• - (, I S. a . .•5 r- . • • , to . i .,,.. ,.: • I .• , • ., . .. ... • -I (.EXIIIBIT B .1:. o. 1(179 ' •: '' - ... .. , . 1/80 • • • • • DEVELOPER ' S *AGREEMENT f • EXHIBIT C . page 1 of 4 • • I. Prior to release of final plat, Owner shall submit to the City Engineer for approval two copies of a development plan (1"=100' scale) showing existing and proposed contours, proposed streets and lot • arrangements and size, minimum floor elevations on each lot, preliminary • alignment and grades for sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer, • 100 year flood plain contours, ponding areas, tributary areas to catch basins, arrows showing direction of storm water flow on all lots, location of walks, trails and any property to be deeded to the City. I1. Owner shall submit detailed construction and storm sewer plans to the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District for review and approval. • Owner shall follow all rules and recommendations of said Watershed District. E III. Owner shall pay cash park fees as to all of the property required by any ordinance in effect as of the date of the issuance of each • building permit for construction on the property. Presently, the amount of cash park fee applicable to the property is $325/single famil $250/multiple unit. The amount to be paid by Owner shall be increased or decreased to the extent that City ordinances are amended or supplemented to require a greater or lesser amount as of the date of the issuance of any building permit for construction on the property. IV. Prior to the dedication, transfer or conveyance of any real property or interest therein to the City as provided herein, Owner shall deliver to the City an opinion addressed to the City by an Attorney, and in a form , acceptable to City, as to the condition of the title of such property or in lieu of a title opinion, a title insurance policy insuring the condition of the property or interest therein in the City. The condition of the title of any real property or any interest therein to be dedicated, transferred or conveyed as may be provided herein by Owner to City shall vest in City good and marketable title, therein free and clear of any mortgages, liens, encumbrances, or assessments. • • ' 1/80 Page 2 of 4 Exhibit C (- A. All sanitary sewer, waternain and storm sewer facilities,concrete curb,qutter sidewalks and other public utilities ("improvements") to he made and constructed on or within the property and dedicated to the City shall be designed in • compliance with City standards by a registered professional engineer and submitted to the City Engineer for approval. All of the improvements shall be completed by Owner & acceptable.to the City Engineer and shall be free and clear of any lien, • . claim, charge or encumbrance, including any for work, labor or services rendered in connection therewith or material or equipment supplied therefore on or before the later of, 2 years from the date hereof or , 19 . . Upon completion and acceptance, Owner warrants and guarantees the improvements against any defect in materials or workmanship for a period of two (2) years • ' following said completion and acceptance. In the event of any .defect in materials • . or workmanship within said 2 year period said warranty and guarantee shall be for a period of three (3) years following said completion and acceptance. Defects in material or workmanship shall be determined by the City Engineer. Acceptance of improvements by the City Engineer may be subject to such conditions as he may impose at the time of acceptance. Owner, through his engineer, shall provide for competent daily inspection during the construction of all improvements. As-built drawings with service and valve ties on reproduceable mylar shall be delivered to the City Engineer within 6(1 days of completion thereof together with a written statement from a registered engineer that all improvements have been completed, inspected and tested in accordance with City-approved plans and speci- fications. Prior to final plat approval, or issuance of any building permit, if no final plat is required, Owner shall: i Submit a bond or letter of credit which guarantees completion of all improvements within the times provided, upon the conditions, and in accordance with the terms of this subparagraph V. A., including but not limited to, a guarantee against defects in materials • or workmanship for a period of two (2) years following completion and acceptance of the improvements by the City Engineer. The amount of the bond or letter of credit shall be 125% of the estimated construction cost of said improvements, subject to reduction thereof • to an amount equal to 25% of the cost of the improvements after . acceptance thereof by the City Engineer ,and receipt of as-built drawings. The bond or letter of credit shall be in such form and contain such other provisions and terms as may be required by the City Engineer. The Owner's registered engineer shall make and submit for approval to the City Engineeu a written estimate of the costs of the improvements. • • B. In lieu of the obligation imposed by subparagraph V.A. above, Owner • • may submit a 100% petition signed by all owners of the property, requesting the City to install the improvements. Upon approval by • the City, Council, the City may cause said improvements to be made and special assessments for all costs for said improvements will be levied on the property, except any property which is or shall be dedicated to the public, over a five year period. Prior to the award of any contract • by the City for the construction of any improvements, Owner shall have ( entered into a contract for rough grading of streets included in the improvements to a finished suhgrade elevation. Contractor's obiiga- . tion with respect to the rough grading wort: shall he secured by a bond or letter of credit which shall guarantee coagrletion, and payment for all lai ' and materials expended in connection with the rough grading. The amount of the bond or letter of credit shall be 125% of the cost of such rough grading and shall be in such form and contain such further terms as may be required by the City Engineer. -fly • page 3 of 4, Exhibit C • • C. Prior to release of final plat, Owner shall pay to City fees for first two year street lighting ( public streets ) engineering review and street signs. • • • 'VI. A. Owner shall remove all soil, and debris from, and clean, all streets within, the property at least every two months, (or within one week from the date of any request by City), during the period commencing May 1 and ending October 31, of each year, until such time as such streets and improvements there- in are accepted for ownership and maintenance by City. B. Within 30 days of installation of utilities and street curb in any portion of the property (if said time occurs between May 1 and October 31 of any year) Owner shall sod (secured with a minimum of 2 stakes per roll of sod) that part of the property lying between said curb and a line 3 feet measured • perpendicular with the curt orinlieu of said sod, place a fiber blanket with seed approved by the City (secured with stakes a minimum of 6 feet apart). Either sod or fiber must be placed upon a minimum of 4 inches of topsoil. The topsoil shall be level with the top of the curb at the curb line and rise t;" for each foot from the curb line. Owner shall maintain the sod, fiber blanket, topsoil, and grade until such time as the streets and improvements in . the property are accepted for ownership and maintenance by City. Owner shall also sod all drainage, swales serving each 1.5 acresa minimum distance of 6 feet on either side of the . center of the Swale. • C. The bond or letter of credit provided in paragraph V. A. hereof shall also guarantee the performance of Owner's obligations under this paragraph VI. VII. Owner shall file this Agreement with the Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles and supply the City with a copy of,this Agreement with information as to Document Number and date and time of filing duly certified thereon within 60 days from the date of this Agreement. • VIII. If Owner fails to proceed in accordance with this Agreement with- in 24 months of the date hereof and provide nroof of filing in �� accordance with ite;i'V11. hereof, Owner for itself, it successors, • 1t% and assigns shall not oppose rezoning of said property to Rural. • 1/80 'Page 4 of 4 Exhibit C IX. Provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforce- able against Owner, its successors, and assigns of the property herein described. X. • Owner represents and warrants it owns fee title to the property free and clear of mortgages, liens and other encumbrances, except: XI. In the event there are or will be constructed on the property, 2 or more streets, and if permanent streets signs have not been installed, Owner shall install temporary street signs in accor- dance with recommendations of the City Building Department, • prior to the issuance of any permit to build upon the property. • TO: Mayor and Council FROM: John Frane DATE: April 3, 1981 RE: Final approval MIDB's Wilson Learning - $1,000,000 Wilson Learning is requesting final approval of their Industrial Revenue Bond Issue. The final documents have been approved by the • City Attorney's office. Resolution 81-68 has not been included in your packet; it will be in the Mayor's signature file Tuesday night. • • • 14 7 MEMORANDUM { TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Acting City Manager John D. Frane SUBJECT: Auto Allowance DATE: April 3, 1981 The present policy of $100.00 per month auto allowance for department heads who do not have the use of a City vehicle was established in 1973. The Council at its March 30th meeting suggested that a change to $150.00 per month be considered at its meeting of April 7th. JDF:jp • /92 April 7, 1981 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. R81-75 .RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVER- TISEMENT FOR BIDS (I.C. 51-344C) WHEREAS, the City Engineer, through Rieke Carroll Muller, Assoc., has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvement, to wit, I.0 51-344C, Utility and street improvements on W. 70th St. west of Shady Oak Road and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The adver- tisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify • the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be opened at 10:00 o'clock A.M. on Thursday, May 7, 1981, and con- sidered by the Council at 7:30 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, May 19, 1981, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, • cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the maount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, Clerk • • -793 Minutes-Parks, Recreation & Unapproved Natural Resources Commission -2- March 16, 1981 All members present. • B.1. Development Proposal —CPT 2nd Phase Building • John Torseth, project architect, and Jim Engler, representing CPT Corp., were present to discuss the project. • . Torceth located the present building at the northwest corner of Mitchell Road and Scenic Heights Drive. He pointed out that the CPT Corporation has been expanding at a very rapid rate over the past • 10 years and especially over the past 2 years, making their present facility, after one year, at 100o capacity. They are looking for more engineering, office and possibly manufacturing space. Torseth mentioned they would like to achieve a better entry system than they presently have. A possibility is to enter from the north side of the site. He said 78th Street might be extended at some point which would bring traffic from 78th St. to Wallace Rd. Torseth said a new parking lot is planned along the west side of the building and a storm/drain system from the parking lot will be channeled.into the pond. Berming is planned around the parking lot and landscaping will be extended along the west property line. Lambert asked if CPT has made any commitments to replace trees presently on the site that have died? Engler said about $20,000 has been invested in replacing trees so far and probably more will be done this year. •Kingrey asked if a trail system has been worked into this plan? • Lambert said there is nothing in the way of a trail. CPT is dedicating approximately 17' of land along Mitohell Road. Lambert further pointed out that an 8' asphalt trail is planned for the east side of Mitohell Road to tie in with the proposed Anderson Lakes Parkway trail, but upgrading of Mitchell Road will not take place until Anderson Lakes Parkway makes a connection. Kingrey said the City should take a very hard look at screening of this site, the extent of proposed plantings, and assurances from the developer that the screening will take place and be maintained. He pointed out that the trees on the site that have died simply weren't • taken care of. • Torseth said they are considering a plan to eliminate the entry on Scenic Heights Drive which would enable them to do more elaborate screening at that point. Lambert said he feels this Commission should express their concern with the large proposed parking area and that the developer comply completely with the screening ordinance. • 1194 • Minutes —Parke, Recreation & unapproved. Nardi 16, 1981 Natural Resources Commission 3- • Kingrey said the way 78th Street is proposed to the west, would draw traffic in front of the Middle School. If expansion/extension of Highway 212 is not a reality, then the pond on the CPT site becomes quite significant from an environmental standpoint, and increased traffic adjaoent to it would definitely have a negative effect on it. Anderson expressed concern that there are no detailed plans, as yet, for landscaping, therefore he feels uncomfortable about the type and • extent of screening that will be done. Lambert said that there is nothing the City can do to insure proper screening other than the screening ordinance whic'. does oover berms, landscaping and maintenanoe. • Kingrey asked that a copy of the City screening ordinance be provided to Commissioners. • MOTION: Jessen moved to approve the revised plan of the CPT addition. Breitenstein seconded the motion. Breitenstein, Friederichs, Jessen and Sohwartz voted "aye", Anderson and Kingrey voted "naye" and YanMeter abstained. The motion passed. DISCUSSION: Kingrey said he voted no because the natural resources on and adjacent to the development have not been adequately considered. He said he wished better answers had been supplied about other areas f affected by a development such as this. • Anderson said he would like to review what is within the realm of this Commission's responsibilities. He feels visual pollution is a ooncern and,is a valid one to look at in developments like this. • Jessen said one should keep in mind the three responsibilities of this Commission in advising the Council on; 1) park planning 2) recreation activities, and 3) inventory of natural resource areas • and recommending appropriate preservation programs. • • -79S • approved Planning Commission Minutes February 23, 1981 MFJDtJ1S ABSCFIT: Liz Recterath A) PT PUD, by CPT Corporation. Request for PUD Concept approval upon 30 acres zoned I-5 to use greater than 50% of the buildings as office space. Located in the Northwest quadrant of Mitchell Road & Scenic Heights Road. A public hearing. The Planner stated that the original request was for a site plan revision but because there would be more than 50% office space, the proponent has requested a PUD Concept approval. Ken Skold, Armstrong, Torseth, Skold, & Rydeen Inc., reviewed the site plan, landscape plan, transportation systems, surrounding zoning districts, parking requirements, and the use of the existing CPT'building. The Planner reviewed the staff reports dated 12/18/81 and 2/20/81. He also stated that 100- parking spaces have been added and further stated that access from MIS on the east side of Mitchell Road would not line up with the CPT access point. He stated that he felt that CPT could move their road to the south. Gartner asked where proposed 212 would be. Skold replied that the 2I2 Corridor ' would go through the parking lot. Sutliff asked if 212 will effect the new City holding ponds. The Planner replied yes. Levitt stated that he felt that access onto Scenic Heights Road is not desireable. He also asked if the staff recommendations are contingent upon the road to Mitchell being • built. The Planner replied yes. Levitt also stated that he felt that he approves • of the office use but felt that parking must be accommodated for this. Torjesen asked where the truck traffic would be: The Planner replied on Mitchell Road. Torjesen then asked if the best interest of the people would be industrial. The Planner replied yes. Bearman asked if the engineering department has been working on this project. The Planner replied yes. Bearman then asked if there is enough area for water run-off. The Planner replied yes. Mrs. Schnabel, 8211 Hiawatha Circle, asked if there will be additional loading docks. Skold replied no. Greg Wymore, 8310 Tamarac Trail stated that he was concerned with the property values, landscaping of the new CCity's water treatment ponds, and the lighting along Mitchell Road. The Planner stated that the City Council considers lights upon petition, and that the City would be providing additional landscaping around their treatment lagoons with the planning water expansion. Planning Commission Minutes -2- approved February 23, 1981 MOTION 1 Levitt moved to close the public hearing on CPT PUD. Gartner seconded, motion carried 6-0. MOTION 2 Levitt moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the PUD plan dated 1/30/81 as per the staff reports of 12/I8/80 & 2/20/81, the CPT report dated 2/23/81, the 12/31/80 Department of Transportation letter and that there will not be access onto Scenic Heights Road. Sutliff seconded, motion carried c- Gartner voted no. (Explaining that the felt that the road petition should lbe received • prior to approval, • ')9t? • 14)t)RANDIFI ' ' TO: . .Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: • Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: March 12,.1981 • ' SUBJECT: Development Proposal Check List PROJECT: CPT 2nd Phase Building PRorasENr: 'CPT Corporation . • RrQursr:_Approval of the CPT addition and amendment to their PUD to allow a higher percettagc 6'T zee space within the industrial zone. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Mitchell Road 4 Scenic heights Drive BACKGROUND: See Planning: Staff Report Dated: PARK AND RECREATION PLANNING CONCERNS ' 1. Type of development: Expansion would be predominately office space and engineering lab facilities. 2. Number of units in residential development: N/A S. Number of acres in the project: 30 4. Special recreation space requirements:N/A • • S. Adjacent to any existing or proposed parks:NO a. Affect on the park: N/A ( 6. Need for a mini park: No • 7. Cash park fee or land dedication? Cash Park Fee paid at rrron. g __ a.. If Cash park fee dedication, amount based on existing ordinance will total: N/A b. If park land dedication, the number of acres to be dedicated is N/A c. Existing or pending assessments or taxes on proposed park property total N/A atd will be paid prior to dedication. S. -Adjacent to existing or proposed trails:Proposed 8' asphalt trail along Mitchell Road. a. Typo of trails transportation bicycle/pedestrain b. Construction Material aSphSalt 8' c. Width of trail d. Party responsible for construction City (upon upgrading Mitchell .Road) c. LanJmmership of trail location:(dedieated, purchased. ROW) INN NATURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION CONCERNS 1. Site grading plan considers natural amenities of the site? Sec Planning Staff Report tinder grading and drainage. • 2. !test significant trading on the site: The most significant grading'on the site occurs.._. north of the-proposed addition. The majority of the grading•of this site generally follows the •natural contour of the land. S. Significant vegetation on the site includes: MI/A 4. The site grading plan indicates preservation of: WA • • S. Adjacent to public waters: The pond in the surrounding area is lister) as puhlie varwr5 . • by the DNR. • a. Affect on wattrs:Th^ 51Z^ of tho o • REFERENCE 01 onstruction of the cast/west road connecting Piitchell Rd. with Wallace Rd. ine DNR may require reshaping of this pond.to maintain the same amount of 1. Major Center Area Study: N/A . of—pub-lie Craters. • 2. Neighborhood Facilities Study:N/A • S. Purgatory Creek Study: N/A • •4. Shoreland Management Ordinance: N/A • S. Floodplain Ordinance: N/A ( 6. code Plan:The Guide Plan depicts this area as industrial 7. Other: •RECO1^UNOATIONS 1. Adjacent neighborhood type, and any neighborhood opinion ;cited in favor or opposed to the project: • 2. Planning Coumission Rccommcndatinn: The Planning Commission recommended approval as per the_Planaillp Staff Qrporto of Den_18, 1980 and F. b 2p. 1981, the CPT R^pmrt dated Feb. 23., 128] anLtheilep21tVi nt of Tr.ncpr.rtntion t^ttrr of Pnc. 31, 1984,and-4hat 3. Comnnmity there wil.lcc oiCC EN1i1gMmsNigs onto Scenic tits. Road. Community Services staff recommends approval as per the P1annit of Dec. 18. 1980 and Fehraury 90, 1041 • • /'7-J It DATE: February 23, 1981 TO: Eden Prairie Planning Commission FROM: CPT Corporation SUBJECT: Planning Staff Recommendations Listed below you will find the recommendations made by the planning staff and what CPT feels they could do to correct any problems we might have in our existing or in our new plans. 1. Landscaping which currently exists along Scenic Heights Road should be strengthened to improve the screening of the existing parking and sod should be placed in the public boulevard to provide a more manicured appearance for the CPT site. ACTION A. We have started to mow this area and will continue to do so. The type of seed used in our landscaping should allow a manicured look if kept mowed and taken care of. B. If the above does not work with reseeding, watering, and upkeep, CPT will look at sod for this area. 2. The future parking lot must be screened through the use of earthen berms and plant material (completely on the CPT site) and should be screened from the south and from the west. ACTION A. This will be done to Eden Prairie's approval on new landscaping plans. 3. Any rooftop mechanical equipment must be completely screened and any ground— based mechanical equipment must be entirely screened. The screening for the ' existing ground—based mechanical equipment should be added and the units painted to match the building. CPT CORPORATION•8100 MITCHELL ROAD•P.O.Box 295•MINNEAPOLIS,MINNFSOTA 55440.6121937.80009 TLX 29-0775 300 ACTION A. The rooftop air conditioner will be painted char brown to match existing metal work on the building per Wally Johnson's request. B. The existing ground-based mechanical equipment will be painted the same color and the ground screening will be added to per the below drawing. rivesit /1.57:3141. *** ) oxo + K 1. o - existing Scotch Pine 2. x - existing White Oak 3. -+-- planned new screening Scotch Pine 4. Prior to the building permit issuance for the CPT addition, a project must be approved which will assure construction of the northern access road in a timely fashion with the CPT addition. ACTION • A. Working on plans for project. S. The two private accesses shown to Mitchell Road from CPT will not both be allowed by Hennepin County. ACTION A. Only one private access will be used. Plan being worked on now to upgrade existing driveway. 6. Proper erosion control must be implemented during construction and a storm water drainage and sedimentation plan must be submitted to the City Engineering Department and the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District for review and approval prior to building permit issuance. ACTION A. Plan will be submitted for review and approval. • t 7. Any future addition beyond the 2nd to CPT buildings must be reviewed by the City Planning Commission. ACTION A. Any new plans will be reviewed at the time. c X(�.I 8. The existing parking and proposed parking must be specifically evaluated by the City Building Department against the CPT floor plan to assure that parking spaces are supplied according to ordinance. All City Ordinances must be adhered to. ACTION A. 894 parking spaces needed according to Ordinance. 951 spaces planned. 9. CPT must apply for and obtain a DNB public waters alteration permit prior to construction. • ACTION A. Will apply for permit. JE/mjo • • • • • �p2 • • MEMO • TO: Planning Commission FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: Feb. 20 , 1981 APPLICANT: C.P.T. REQUEST: PUD Development Stage approval to allow expansion of existing facility ( 112, 000 sq. ft. ) to 247,900 sq, • ft.within the I-5 Zone, and to permit more than 50% office use. REFER TO: Original submission material ( Dec. 8, 1980); staff report • (Dec. 18, 1980); PUD material ( Jan. 5, 1981). DACi:GROURD •• In 1978 C.P.T. was zoned I-5 park for industrial use with up to 50Z office space. CPT was required to present future development phases to the City • and to prevent additional traffic from accessing directly onto Scenic Heights Road ( because of its residential character). •In presenting its new plan for development earlier this year, we discovered, while evaluating proposed parking, the expansion would be predominately office space and would exceed the 507, allowable by ordinance. Since the Office District in our Zoning Ordinance does not clearly allow manufacturing and we feel that CPT has strong industrial characteristics; and since CPT's utilization of the site may vary•over the years in percen- tage of office space; CPT has resubmitted the request as a PUD in order to allow additional office space in an industrial zone. Their current proposal contemplates a total of 247,900 sq. ft. building, made up of : 151,000 sq. ft . office, 42,000 sq. ft. manufacturing, 24,I87 sq. ft. warehouse, and a balance of 30,713 sq. ft. .cafeteria and mechanical. • The allowable make up of their building would therefore be determined by their ability to meet parking requirements. Information presented indicates • 893 spaces required according to ordinance. ( This figure is subject to review by the buildinn department as to allowable exclusions of floor areas.) There wi11 be 951 spaces provided. • AccJSS CPI has been working to gain agreement on placement of a road along their northern inindr.ry to give them additional. access to Mitchell Road. Re have not been made aware of any tru'therprogress which they have made toward accomplishing this, and it is critical to their expansion. 1 a03 • • Memo- CPT PUD Feb. 20, 1981 GRADING • The grading plans provided are very difficult to read. Generally , however, Scenic Heights road south of the new parking area, is at about elevation 906. A large berm is planned along Scenic Heights to screen the proposed parking. • Since no significant change in grade occurs between the southern most parking lot and the road, and the berm does not extend north along the western boundary, additional screening will be required. • The southern parking lot is at a mean elevation of about 902 as compared with the existing parking lot of 875 ±. The larger, northern parking lot is proposed at 832; this will place the larger lot 20 feet lower than Scenic Heights with a landscaped bank between the two lots. All of the lots would be interconnectable in the future, if access were permitted to Scenic Heights. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommend approval of the PUD as presented to allow more than 50% office in an 1-5 Zone subject to the recorniendations contained in the December 18, 1890 staff report.• • • • CE:jj • STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: December 18, 1980 SUBJECT: CPT 2ND PHASE BUILDING LOCATION: The Northwest corner of Mitchell Road and Scenic Heights Drive BACKGROUND The-SO acres upon which CPT is currently situated is zoned I-5 Industrial Park. This zoning was granted in 1978 upon review of an application by CPT for location for its 112,000 sq. ft. corporate headquarters and assembly plant. At the time of this rezoning, there was a considerable amount of neighborhood opposition to the plan because the change in zoning was to an industrial category rather than a medium density residential category as depicted an the Comprehensive Guide Plan. For that reason, CPT was required to adhere to certain stringent standards regarding screening of parking, loading areas, and standards as to access to Mitchell Road and Scenic Heights Road. It was felt that Scenic Heights Road was a residential road and indus- trail traffic should be limited on it to visitors and executives' access only. With the doubling of CPT's employees and building size, it becomes imperative to not only find a seperate access out to Mitchell Rbad but for CPT to become a part of a larger industrial road system so as not to overload the intersection of Mitchell Road and T.H. 5. Although CPT represented in their initial presentation of the first building that all parking areas would be completely screened from surrounding residents and from the public road, Architectural Alliance, their design consultant,somehow found that on the southern boundary of the property they had 10' less than they had anticipated in which to provide berming. For this reason the western side of the parking lot has been screened through the use of evergreen plant material rather than the use of earthen berms. Complaints have been received from residents in the area regarding the long period of time to install land- scaping initially and the long period of time required to replace the large amount of dead plant material that occurred over the first winter. In addition, residents have voiced concern about the very unmanicured appearance of the CPT site directly adjacent to Scenic Heights Road. TRAFFIC SYSTEMS Because of the size of the addition proposed, (120,000 sq. ft. of office) traffic generation of this site will be about 2,000 A.D.T.. With this additional traffic load the and traffic e<pected fromthe MTS Industrial Campus, it is imperative that a secondary industrial road system be planned and implemented for this area. CPT proposes and illustrates in their brochure a possibility of a road extension from the southern end of Wallace Road easterly across Eaton Char-Lyn's southern boundary and bisecting the CPA/CPT sites before intersecting with Mitchell Road. This system would then be extended through the MIS property easterly to an intersection West 78th Street and T.H. 5. This road system when combined with the extension of Anderson Lakes Parkway southerly to U.S. 169, will provide an adequate industrial network to assure good access to the property. It is important for CPT to work with their industrial neighbors to complete plans for a road system as described as part of their plans for expansion of their new building. X(4> • Staff Report-CPT 2nd Phase Bldg. page 2 The site plan provided by CPT illustrates an additional access to Mitchell Road lying approximately 300' south of the existing access. Hennepin County Highway Department has reviewed this and will only allow the existing access 'or the new access but not both. The addition proposed by CPT will come within the preferred alignment suggested in the scoping document for the Highway 212 corridor. MnDOT has been contact- ed as to the construction now proposed and is not in a position to begin acquisition, nor can MnDOT state that this is the final corridor. If the city were to deny a building permit on this concern alone, Eden Prairie may be in a position having to acquire right-of-way from CPT in an area that is not clearly indicated by the highway department as the final 212 corridor. Parking The parking for the existing CPT building,al though it does meet the ordinance requirement, does seem to be tight. The existing parking provided is 378 spaces for a 112,000 sq. ft. building made up of approximately 1 assembly area and 'Z office. Ordinance 142 requires 5 parking spaces per thousand sq. ft. '- gross floor area be provided for an office use and 3 spaces per thousand sq. ft. gross floor area be provided for an assembly use. Since the new 120,000 sq. ft. addition is proposed as all office, a quick general look would seem to indicate that 600 spaces in addition to the existing spaces would be required. CPT however, proposes only 389 spaces. The staff suggests that a very detailed look at the parking spaces proposed be made by the building department prior to issuanace of a permit to assure that enough parking spaces are provided. There does however, appear to be substantial discrepancy between 600 possibly required and 389 proposed and one would wonder where on the site this additional parking could be provided if it is required. The staff would suggest that CPT work with the Advisory Committee of the Chamber of Conmerce that is studying alternative transportation modes to try and adopt or become part of a ride-sharing or van-pooling program. This would not only eliminate the need for excessive parking but would also reduce traffic congestion which will be generated by this use. In addition, CPT should seriously consider staggering working hours of their employees. Screening The parking lot areas will cover a massive part of the CPT site and the existing screening of the existing parking should be beefed up to provide additional screening and should be cleaned up in order to provide a more manicurred look. In addition, screening of the new parking lot will be required and should be done through the use of grade separation and earth berming rather than completely relying on plant materials. The brochure provided illustrates that CPT is planning on the use of the Scenic Heights right-of-way for a portion of its berm. This will not be permitted and the plan should be modified to reflect all screening within the CPT property. In addition, the areas planned in the new employee parking lot,of green space,should definitely be retained in the final construction. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The addition of the new building takes advantage of the natural contour of the land but will require construction of a large pad similar in character to the first building. An architectural north facing slope will be created which repeats the shape of the building. For this grading work and for work on the northern side of the pond to create the road, the proponent will have to obtain S • Staff Report-CPT 2nd Phase B1dg. page 3 a permit from the Department of Natural Resources. The pond and surrounding area is listed as wetland by the DNR and while they may allow reforming of the pond, they will require review of the work to be done and the proponent must obtain a permit. No storm sewer or utility plans are shown on the submitted material and this information must be submitted and reviewed by the City Engineering Department,complete with catch basins, and outlets to the pond. • AlsO the . City Engineering. Department should review the outflow of the pond. RECOMMENDATIONS • The Planning Staff would recommend that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the CPT Addition and amendment to the their planned unit development to allow a higher percentage of office space within the industrial zone subject to the following: 1. Landscaping which currently exists along Scenic Heights Road should be strengthened to improve the screening of the existing parking and sod should be placed in the public boulevard area to provide a more manicurred appearance for the CPT site. 2. The future parking lot must be screened through the use of earthen berms and plant material (completely on the CPT site and should be screened from the south and from the west. 3. Any rooftop mechanical equipment must be completely screened and any ground based mechanical equipment must be entirely screened. The screening for the existing ground based mechanical equipment should be.added too and the units painted to match the building. 4. Prior to the building permit issuance for the CPT addition, a project must be approved which will assure construction of the northern access road in a timely fashion with the CPT addition. 5. The two private accesses shown to Mitchell Road from CPT will not both be allowed by Hennepin County. 6. Proper erosion control must be implemented during construction and a •storm water drainage and sedimentation plan must be submitted to the City Engineering Department and the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District for review and approval prior to building permit issuance. 7. Any future addition beyond the 2nd to CPT buildings must be reviewed by the City Planning Commission. 8. The existing parking and proposed parking must be specifically evaluated by the City Building Department against the CPT floor plan to assure that parking spaces are supplied according to ordinance. All City Ordinances must be adhered to. 9. CPT must apply for and obtain a DNR public waters alteration permit co; prior to construction. CE:ss 10/7 Au.51 • ARMSTROHG,TORSETH.SKOLD AHD RMDEEN, NC. ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS e901 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY MMNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55422 PHGI (512)5453731. March 5, 1981 • City of Eden Prairie Department of Administration 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55436 Attention: Mr. Chris Enger Re: CPT Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN - Project No. 8023 Dear Mr. Enger: . Here is the Drainage Study you requested for the pond located on the above project. This was prepared by our Engineering Department so if you have any questions please contact Harold Shull or Bob Martini. Very truly yours, ARMSTRONG, TORSETH, SKOLD AND RYDEEN, INC. By •Vt"AQ Al Mjoru , AIA AM:ps Enclosure cc: files Kenneth!.SkoldeJehn C.TonetheJames E.RydeeneKenneth E.GreboweLeRoy H.PalmQuisleHuold-E.Shull'Donald L.Yunoner • DRAINAGE STUDY • C.P.T. ADDITION - #8023 March 5, 1981 ADDITIONAL ROOF AREA 64,600 ft2 • ADDITIONAL PARKING LOT E DRIVE 233,450 ft2 TOTAL ADDITIONAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 64,800 + 233,450 298,250 ft2 RAINFALL: Based on Handbook of Drainage and Construction Products, Armco, pp 205, 1958. 50 year maximum - 2.65" in one hour period. VOLUME PER HOUR 298,250 ft2 x 2.65 inches f 12 inches/ft F 65,863.5 ft3/hr PONDING AREA ELEVATION: 850'-0" 136,600 ft2 CHANGE IN POND ELEVATION (65,863.5 ft3 . 136,600 ft2) x 12 inches/ft = 5.79 inches ADDITIONAL WETLAND ELEVATION: 852' - 0" 62,000 ft2 WETLAND USED (62,000) (5.79 j 24) 0 14,958 ft2 EFFECTIVE PONDING AREA 136,600 ft2 + 14,958 ft2 .c 151.558 ft2 RESULTANT ELEVATION CHANGE (65,863.5 ft3 151,558 ft2) x 12 inches/ft c 5.22 inches • • • w09 1:7SM f' ARMSTRONG,TORSETH,SKOLD AND RYDEEN, NC. ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS 4201 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY MedNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55422 PHONE(512)545-3731 • February 25, 1981 • City of Eden Prairie Department of Administration 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN Re: CPT Corporate Facilities Expansion Gentlemen: On Monday evening, February 23, 1981, the Eden Prairie Planning Commission reviewed the CPT application for 1-5 PUD and approved the same. We request the public hearing .with the City Council as required for final approval. Very truly yours, ARMSTRONG, TO ETH, SKOLD AND RYDEEN, INC. • Kennet . Skold, AIA KLS/clg cc: files • • Kenneth1.SkoldeJohnC.Tor set heJemesE.Rydeene Kenneth E.Gnbow0LOR0YH.Pelmquiste Harold E.Shull Doneld.L.Yunyrtrr (l10 r ARMSTRONG, TORSETH, SKOLD AND RYDEEN, INC. Project Number 8023 ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS MEMORANDUM NO. 38 DATE February 23, 1981 PROJECT CPT Corporation Eden Prairie, MN • SUBJECT Planning Commission Meeting PRESENT City of Eden Prairie Planning Commission - Mr. William Bearman, Chairman Mr. Grant Sutliff Mr. Robert Hallet Ms. Virginia Garten Mr. Hokan Torjesen Mr. Matthew Levitt Eden Prairie Planning Department - Mr. Chris Enger Citizens of Eden Prairie - Various property owners including both residential and representatives from surrounding industrial property owners CPT Corporation - Mr. Gary Holland Mr. Jim Engler ATS &R, Inc. - Mr. Ken Skold Mr. Paul Erickson Mr. Al Mjorud BY Al Mjorud The CPT Corporation was listed on the agenda of the regularly scheduled Planning Commission Meeting for the purpose of consideration to first change the zoning class- ification by adding a planned unit development classification to the existing industrial- 5 zoning and; secondly, to consider a roadway or access to the new parking iot. The following information was received from this meeting: 1. The Planning Commission received copies of the following: A. Architect's drawings reduced to 83" x 11" showing proposed roadway and proposed site development on the CPT property. B. CPT's response and commitment to the Eden Prairie staff report dated February 23, 1981, entittad, "Planning Staff Recommendations". 2. The following items are in response to the Architect's presentation of the roadway plan, landscape screening plan and site development plan. A. Mr. Chris Enger suggested that the proposed road north of CPT be relocated to align with the road proposed by the MTS Corporation. This would involve reshaping the pond in accord with DNR Regulations. B. Since the relocation of Highway 212 on the CPT property is not dead, it was noted that the City would have to purchase this roadway corridor from CPT In order to provide a right-of-way for a possible future use by the Highway Department. The Planning Commission did not take action to purchase this property. i j ARMSTRONG, TORSETH, SKOLD AND RYDEEN, INC. ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS Project Number 8023 Memorandum No. 38 • Re: CPT Corporation ( February 23, 1981 (page 2) C. If future building is planned beyond the proposed building shown on drawings, a parking structure would have to be constructed in order to meet the parking requirements. D. Access to the proposed parking lot could occur on CPT property by building. over the watershed parcel and reshaping the pond. E. Upon receipt of petition of approval from land owners adjacent to proposed roadway, the roadway feasibility study by the City would begin. F. The Architects were directed to study the runoff and the impact of the new impervious surfaces and possible build-up of water in the pond. G. The landscape screening plan was approved subject to the building permit approval when the overall landscape plan is presented for review. 3. The residents present at the meeting found no exception with the existing landscaping and screening. One resident was complimentary. 4. It was stated that due to the increasing traffic on Mitchell Road, road improvements will be needed soon. 5. It was moved, seconded, and carried approving the CPT request to change their zoning from an 1-5 to a PUD 8-5 zoning with the stipulation that no access be provided from Scenic Heights Road to the new parking lot and that the CPT response to the Eden Prairie staff report be included as part of the motion. ( AM/clg cc: Mr. Dean Scheff Mrs. Diana Scheff Mr. Cary Holland Mr. Jim Engler Ms. Elaine Weiss Mr. Chris Enger General Office Products Files (2) i l 3 ARMSTRONG, TORSETH, SKOLD AND RYDEEN, INC. ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS Project Number 8023 MEMORANDUM NO. 37 DATE February 19, 1981 PROJECT CPT Corporation Eden Prairie, MN . SUBJECT Meeting with City of Eden Prairie officials PRESENT CPT Corporation - Mr. Jim Engler • City of Eden Prairie - Mr. Carl Jullie, City Engineer Mr. Wally Johnson, Building Inspector Mr. Chris Enger, City Planner ATS ER, Inc. - Mr. Al Mjorud Mr. Paul Erickson BY Paul Erickson During the meeting the following information was received and decisions were made: 1. Roadway A. All at the meeting gave general approval of driveway entrance dated February ( 18, 1981. The Architect was directed to select needed turning radius for trucks upon entering site. It was recommended that some type of turn-off lane be provided at the northerly portion of driveway entrance. Carl Jullie stated that standard size of turn-off lanes are 13'-0"by approximately 300 feet long. B. Eden Prairie requires that outside edge of curb at island be 27'-0" from center line of road. C. The existing driveway concrete curb has a 6" curb and 2'-0" gutter with 6" base. The concrete curb extends out and around to quarter section of turning radius. Mitchell Road has bituminous curbing. D. The City officials stated there is no spillway or culvert connecting ponds on either side of Mitchell Road. Furthermore, none is required at this time. 2. Exits A. Existing building corridor is one-hour rated. A fire alram system is currently being installed. Magnetic door holders may be required in corridor. B. Wally Johnson stated that the proposed one-hour rated north corridor on southeast side of the new building is not required as long as 30'-0" of clear aisle space is provided from one-hour rated corridor in existing building. C. A set of reference plans were given to Mr. Johnson for further study. The Architect was given general approval of exits. { 3. Fire Extinguishers A. Mr. Johnson said that according to UBC Chapter 38, no dry chemical fire extin- guishers are needed if building is sprinklered. B. Mr. Johnson said that if any fire extinguishers are to be provided, they should be five pound (5 lb.) ABC. Halon fire extinguishing was approved for vault. CO2 fire extinguishers were approved for Engineering Labs. • ARMSTRONG, TORSETH, SKOLD AND RYDEEN, INC. Project Number 8023 ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS Memorandum No. 37 Re: CPT Corporation t February 19, 1981 (page 2) 3. Fire Extinguishers (cont.) C. Sidewall sprinkler heads were approved for atrium and skylight areas. D. The range hood and duct must be sprinklered with water. Locate duct sprinkler heads every ten feet (10') on center. Provide access panels at each sprinkler head. E. Eden Prairie will require kitchen plan review with Architect. Ordinance No. 250 regarding kitchen requirements will be sent to Architect. • 4. Fire Hydrants A. Mr. Johnson stated only one (1) fire hydrant is required for addition and should be a minimum of fifty feet (50') away from building. The recommended locat on is at northwest portion of site. The new fire hydrant should be looped with existing fire hydrant and back to street line. B. For two-story buildings,a flow meter indicator and a detector check are.not required. C. There is a requirement that one (1) fire alarm be located above or close to Siamese connection. Any type of flow alarm is permissable. D. New eight inch (8") water line for new fire hydrant and sprinkler system will connect to existing fire hydrant and sprinkler system. A new meter is required for this fire system. 5. General Information A. Mr. Jim Engler gave the Architect the Maintenance Manual for Electric portion of existing building. B. Mr. Carl Jullie gave the Architect the Street Sections Information Sheet for City of Eden Prairie dated March 14, 1980. PWE/clg • cc: Mr. Dean Scheff Mrs. Diana Scheff Mr. Jim Engler Ms. Elaine Weiss Mr. Carl Jullie Mr. Wally Johnson Mr. Chris Enger Files (2) • t ' • SGL INCORPORATED 6824 WEST 68th STREET MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 66435 (4 SI494149511 ' February 25, 1981 • Mr. Chris Enger Director Of Planning City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 Subject: C. P. T. Dear Mr. Eager: • Thought I would drop you a note to let you ]mow that I am interested in working with you and C.P.T. to enable this project to be completed.. My feeling with regard to the road is that we can develop our property with an adequate street touching our northeast lot corner. We are currently working with a major lender to construct an office and warehouse facility of at least 100,000 square feet. • At the time the road is approved, I feel we should have I-5 zoning granted. Please let n1e know if you concur. When I return to Minneapolis after March 10th, I will contact you far further discussions. Sincerely, SGL INCORPORATED .i%/i.-• Donald M. Goetzman President tt :ng • February 3, 1981 TO: City of Eden Prairie SUBJECT: PUD Concept Stage-Submission Requirements 1. Project Indentification A. Ownership: copy of Abstract of Title attached. B. Developers CPT Corporation. C. Fiscal, economic: new addition will be financed out of present working capital. D. Development Method: actual construction. E. Development timing: start early summer of 1981. Complete summer of 1982. • F. Critical Public Decisions: West 78th St. extension Planned Unit Development G. Additional general project information: letter attached. • CPT CORPORATION•8100 MITCHELL ROAD•P.O.BOX 295•MINNEAAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55440.622E937-8000•TLX29.0775 • • • r • • • r • • • January 5, 1981 _' • • • Eden Prairie City Offices 8950 Eden Prairie Road • Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Gentlemen: The CPT Corporation has continued its fabulous growth during the past years residency in its new Eden Prairie office and plant facility. This growth has occurred thru sales in the United States, but also a many fold increase in foreign sales. The increases now require expansion of the Eden Prairie home office and plant facility. The increases of the Eden Prairie plant at this time must concentrate on expansion of the International Administration and Engineering facility, office and laboratory, to cover new products and conversion of products to foreign requirements. CPT sees that their growth over the next years will fluctuate as to the amount of office space and manufacturing space that will be required at any one period. These requirements will at times exceed the allowable 5096 office space designated maximum in the Eden Prairie ordinances for 1-5 Industrial Zoning. To allow for the continuing changes that will be required in the operation of the CPT Corporation, we are applying for a Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) status within the 1-5 Industrial Zone. • Siincer ely, ou.,/"11 �4 Dean F. Scheff I�JJ Chairman DFS:n �r1 CPT CORPORATION•6100 MITCHELL ROAD•P.O.BOx 295•MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 55440•6121937-5000*TLX 29.077.5 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av. South • Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 •";o, . , HENNEPIN • 935-3381 • December 31, 1980 Mr. Chris Enger Director of Planning City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Mr. Enger: • RE Proposed Plat - "CPT Corporation 2nd Phase" Future CSAH 60 NW Quadrant Scenic Heights Road Section 16, Township 116, Range 22 Hennepin County Plat No. 888 Review and Recommendations We reviewed the above plat and found it acceptable with consideration of these conditions: -The developer should dedicate 17 ft. additional right of way making the right of way 50 ft. from the center of Mitchell Road. • -We recommend no additional access directly onto Mitchell Road. •All access should be via Scenic Heights Road or the proposed road abutting the plat on the north. Please direct any response or questions to Les Weigelt. Sincerely, • d-(),(‘ • 1 James M. Hold, P.E. • Chief, Planning and Programming JMW/LDW:pj f HENNEPIN COUNTY IIIan equal opportunity employer • t' A ARMSTRONG,TORSETH.SKOLD AND RYDEEN, INC. ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS 6..�++ ��..++�wW! 4001 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 55422 PHONE(612)545.3731 December 8, 1980 Eden Prairie Planning Commission Eden Prairie City Hall Eden Prairie, MN Attention: Mr. Chris Enger Re: CPT Corporation, Project Number 8023 Gentlemen: • The following written information accompanied by; ' Proposed city access easement and industrial roadway plan; CPT second phase site plan; CPT future site plan and masterplan; are submitted for your approval of the next phase in the continuing development of the CPT Corporation property. The continued growth of the CPT Corporation has necessitated the immediate undertaking of Phase II of the Multi-phase expansion of the corporate headquarters. Phase II expansion primarily covers additional office space and engineering lab facilities. It will consist of a two story addition that will match the existing building in design characteristics and construction. The proposed future Masterplan is today's thinking with regard as to how the property might be expanded as corporation growth continues. The exact nature of this expansion can only be determined when exact needs are known. The following outline of information is presented to the Planning Commission iri obtaining the approval for the continuation of the phased development of the CPT Corporation. 1. Land Area - The site is approximately 30 acres in size or 1,306,800 square feet. 2. The pond and wetland area covers approximately 4.7 acres. 3. The floor plan of the existing building is approximately 112,800 square feet. 4. Road access - Presently the CPT Corporation has their main road access from Mitchell Road. They also have a secondary limited access to the south on Scenic Heights Road. With the anticipated growth and usage of the property, and the restriction set forth in the Agreement (developed with the City during the con- struction of the first phase), it is apparent that additional access will be required from Mitchell Road by way of the north property line. In noting from the Developer's Agreement signed on August 15, 1978, between CPT and the City • of Eden Prairie, Item Number 7 states, "Future access to the northwest portion of the property shall be from the proposed Mitchell Road access or through an easement to Mitchell Road situated northerly of the property."' As part of this continuation of the site development, the CPT Corporation recommends to the City, the consideration to develop a road that would connect Wallace Road to the proposed road submitted by the MTS Corporation in their concept plan that would extend and connect to 78th Street. This roadway would case the traffic condition that presently occurs on highway #5 and the intersections of Mitchell Road and Wallace Road. It would also act as a service road to the industrial areas when the SonnethL.Skold•JohnC.Torsanl•JamosE.Rydoon•KonnuthE.Grabow•Lultoy 1.Pulmqulst•?IaroIdE.Shull.DOnaIdL.Yungnur ..I� s • Eden Prairie Planning Commission Re: CPT Corporation % December 8, 1980 (page 2) 4. cont. future Highway 212 is extended in freeway capacity along the present Highway $5. Due to the City's restricting of access to Scenic Heights Road, the CPT Corporation would endorse a proposal to establish such a connecting road system. 5. Parking Facilities - Based on use of the building, the existing facility requires 311 cars and CPT has parking facilities for 378 cars. With the new addition, the total required parking spaces would 758. The proposal being presented shows parking facilities for 767 cars. 6. City Utilities - a. Sanitary Sewer - Presently the CPT Corporation connects to an 8" sanitary sewer in Tamarack Trail by means of a lift station. The use of the sanitary sewer for the CPT operation includes waste produced from the kitchen facility and toilet facilities. As plans are developed, sewer requirements will be reviewed with the City. Preliminary studies indicate that the 8" sewer will be adequate to handle present, proposed and future needs. b. Water Service - Presently the City has a 16" main and a 24" main that borders the CPT property. There seems to be no problem with regards to water service. c. Storm Sewer - Surface water will be collected in the pond on the CPT property via a storm sewer system in accord with the Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District. 7. Land-Building Ratio - The land area is 1,306,800 square feet and using the .5 ratio as per the zoning ordinance, the building area could be 653,400 square feet. The Phase II project would add approximately 120,000 square feet to the existing 112,800 square feet or a total at this time of approximately 233,000 square feet. This figure is well under the allowable. r, If additional information is required, please feel free to contact our office or Mr. Jim Engler of the CPT Corporation. Yours very truly, ARMSTRONG, TORSETH, SKOLD AND RYDEEN, INC. • By LPL/// John C. Torseth, AIA JCT/clg cc: Mr. Jim Engler files 120 81-1-PUD CPT PUD CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 81-66 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND AMENDING THE 1968 GUIDE PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of Ordinance 135 provided for the Planned Unit Development ( PUD ) of certain areas located within the City, and WHEREAS, the CPT PUD is considered a proper amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan, and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing • on CPT's request to utilize greater than 50% of the buildings as office space and recommended approval to the City Council, and WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on April 7, 1981. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The CPT PUD, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. • 2. That the City Council does grant PUD approval as out- lined in the application material dated January 5 and January 30, 1981. 3. That the PUD meet the recommendations of the Manning Commission dated February 23, 19B1. ADOPTED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie on this day of , 1981. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL approved Planning Commission Minutes -2- March 9, 1981 All members present. V. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. VALLEY PLACE OFFICES, by C.S.J. Development. Request to rezone 4 acres form Rural to Office for Townoffices Located at 9975 Valley View Road. A continued public meeting. • Bearman turned the chair over to Retterath. The Planner stated that Mr. Bill Jacobson was present to give a presentation. He also stated that the proponent has a revised plan, and stated that Mr. George Hoff, representing Mr. Herleiv Helle has presented a letter dated 3/9/81. Jacobson stated that Mr. Charles Garrity and Mr. J.F. Swanson was also present. Jacobson distributed a brochure to the commission members illustrating the interior of the proposed building. He reviewed the site plan, grading plan, and stated that they have contacted the neighbors and are awaiting a decision but expect it soon. The Planner reviewed the staff report dated 3/6/81, and stated that the recommenda- tions made in the Hennepin County Department of Transportation letter dated 2/12/81 should be included. He also stated that the storm sewer location has not yet been decided. Levitt asked if there is existing sewer in Valley View Road and how the utilities will be worked out. The Planner replied no, and that the utilities will be worked out by the Engineering Department. Levitt asked who owns the unplatted land. The Planner replied Mr. Helle. Torjesen stated that he was concerned with the sewer locations. Hallett stated that he was concerned that Ordinance 135 precludes the use of wood as an exterior meterial for commercial buildings. The Planner replied that the proponent will have to go before the Board of Appeals. Retterath asked how heat efficient the building would be. Jacobson replied that the degree of heat will be above the required heat by the State Code. He • also stated that they will use fans to circulate the air. He also stated that they will be using the air conditioner less in the Summer. Herleive Helle, 6138 Arctic Way, Edina, MN stated that he has had a letter from his attorney distributed to the commission members dated 3/9/81, but also stated that Mr. Hoff was unable to attend because he was ill. He stated that he was very concerned as to the location of the sanitary sewer and storm sewer drainage, and stated that he would go along with the realignment of Valley View Road putting the sewer in the R.O.W. Levitt asked where the sanitary sewer would connect after it has gone through Valley View Road. The Planner replied that it would not exist past Norseman 4th. Helle asked if Valley View Road's extension could be postponed. The Planner replied that he felt that it would be advantageous to finish the road. Dearman stated that he was willing to have the sanitary sewer go along the eastern side of the property. �22 • • approved Planning Commission Minutes -3- March 9, 1981 The Planner stated that building permits cannot be issued prior to working out the problems. Swanson stated that they are willing to go along with the City Engineers recommendations. MOTION oorjesen moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the Valley Place Offices proposal as per the plans dated 3/5/81 and the 2/6/81 staff report. Levitt seconded, motion carried 6-0-1. Bearman abstained. • • • • N23 approved Planning Commission Minutes February 23, 1981 MEMBERS ABSENT: Liz Retterath B. VALLEY PLACE OFFICES, by C.S.J. Development. Request � to rezone 4 acres from Rural to Office for Townoffices. Located at 9975 Valley View Road. A public meeting. Bearman turned the chair over to Commissioner Levitt. The Planner stated that this site is an existing residential site and also stated that Mr. Bill Jocobson was present to•give a presentation. Bill Jacobson, C.S.J. Development reviewed the site, floor area ratio. parking requirements, setbacks, the inner road, and the building plans. He also intro- duced Mr. Charles Garrity, one of the owners. Sutliff asked the amount of impervious surface coverage. Jacobson replied 80,000 sq. ft. Sutliff asked if handicapped parking spaces are required in our ordinance. The Planner replied that it is in the State Building Code. Torjesen asked what the guide plan designates for this site. The Planner replied industrial development. Nerlieve Helle, 6138 Arctic Way, Edina, PIN stated that he was concerned with the assessment of the storm sewer, all to his property, with none being assessed to the residential parcels. • Levitt asked if Valley View Road will be altered at this time. The Planner stated that the profile of Valley View Road is expected to change, but could not give a time schedule. • Levitt stated that he felt that a graphic should be included in the staff report, to depict clearly, surrounding conditions. Torjesen commented that he felt the proponent has done a great deal to save the oak trees. Hallett also agreed. MOTION Gartner moved to continue the Valley Place Offices rezoning to March 9, 1981. Sutliff seconded, motion carried 5-0-1. Bearman abstained. y2U • (' (I. • • STAFF REPORT i. • • • TO: Planning Commission FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: March 6, 1981 • • SUBJECT: VALLEY PLACE OFFICES APPLICANT: G.S.J. Development FEE OWNER: Charles and Judith Hillger REQUEST: Rezoning from kural to OFC District for four (4) acres of land located in the central/eastern por- tion of the community approximately 1500 feet west of Washington Avenue, South of Valley View Road • Comprehensive Guide Plan: • • The Guide Plan depicts this area as industrial. However, the proposed office use would be compatible within the industrial zone, and allows preservation of the land form and the majority of the trees, which typical industrial would not. Existing Zoning: The existing zoning is Rural; Office is requested. The proposal is con- sistant with the setback and Floor Area Ratio requirements'of Ordinance 135. Parking: Five parking spaces per I000square feet of gross floor area is required under Ordinance 141. The actual number of parking spaces required will be reviewed at the time of building permit application, when final floor plans are available. Screening: Screening of all parking areas is required from public roads. A final landscaping plan illustrating this must be submitted prior to building permit issuance. • Exterior Materials: Wood is not an approved exterior material under Ordinance 135. Since this project is not a Planned Unit Development, if wood is contemplated, the Board of Appeals would have to grant a variance. Access to Valley View Road: Hennepin County is currently working on plans for lowering Valley View Road. " The timing of this improvement is tentative if the City's Tax Increment Financing program were not to go ahead (which would provide the City's share ( of the road improvements). The proponent must obtain a permit from Hennepin County for correct placement of an entrance to Valley View Road and required acceleration and turning lanes. B25 ' • Staff Report-Valley Place Offices • page 2 Utilities: water improvement project is currently underway which will place water • service along the north side of Valley View Road in the vicinity of this • project. The water service will have to cross under the road to serve this project. Sewer•to serve this site must come from the south but could potentially . occur in one of three locations: from the property's southwest corner, south to West 74th St.; from the projects southeast corner, south to West 74th St.; and from the projects northwest corner, west within Valley View Road R.O.W., just west of the Hillger property and then south within the future R.O.W. of the north/south road proposed during the Norseman Indus- trial Park 4th Addition rezoning (see graphic) Final sanitary sewer location will be reviewed by the Engineering Department. The onsite drainage can be completely taken to the north. If drainage is planned. to the south, the Engineering Department will recommend a sharing of the assessment for the project which has been ordered south of here. Fire hydrants, fire lanes, and clear zones to the buildings will be re- viewed by the Building Department prior to permit.issuance. Traffic Circulation: Traffic generation would be expected to be about 12 Average Daily Trips per 1000 square feet of gross floor area or about 550 A.D.T. for this project. This is comparable to the traffic impact of industrial utiliza- tion of the entire site. From the entrance on Valley View Road, to the east end of the proposed • parking lot is approximately 750'. To compensate for this long 'dead end, the developer is planning the center drive lane at 30' in width, versus 25' typically found in a parking lot. In addition, the developer should plan a connection to the northern property, • which would allow a future potential looping, for an additional access to Valley View Road. ' Site Plan • The site plan follows the existing grades very nicely and allows for pre- servation of many of the mature oaks on the site. However, prior to building permit issuance, construction limits should clearly be set on the site and snow fencing placed around the trees to be saved, at or beyond the drip lines. Necessary Permits: The Nine-Mile Creek Watershed District must be contacted by the developer for their requirements. This site is not within Shoreland, or Floodplain and does not require environmental review. • Staff Report-Valley Place Offices page 3 • • • RECDMENDATIDNS • The Planning Staff finds that the proposal is consistant with the Compre- •hensive Plan, and recommends approval of the rezoning from Rural to OFC- District for approximately four acres subject to the following: 1. The project, when presented for building permits must be in conformance with City Ordinances. 2. Necessary R.D.W. must be dedicated to'Hennepin County. • 3. Cash park fee of $14D0 per acre would be applicable. 4. A plan showing construction limits and fencing protection for trees must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to building permit issuance. 5. Storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water locations, connections and assessments to be reviewed and included in final recommendations to the City Council by our Engineering Department. • 6. Plan for a parking lot drive connection to the northern property to allow a 'looping' and two points of access in the future. • CE:ss . I .a /,, I - - PROPOSED STREET 0 ^ 1DI I HL±: a REAL I GPlE0. i 1�1 FY20dQ�, _'� I F - I C T . 1 • • �z� m ' ` aA ., _,O -s N N -f Nv 1 AA mIA m r�o to fD 0 z p .r. A J N r.a m y c /7 b� 1 -4 n n = t) / ,` n c ] m n L f✓ T • 1.91iF;t1 ik'A tf:2!: • • k 3 • ��j N w 3BI B-B WITH B GIB I M a CURB a GUTTER. r pl:'itiTi!li J.U i 4rta • N 1.\ s ® 1 0 i V n 0 �':: i f O ` 11 .• v r4 O n • yIpSHINGTON • Xag' • • • • UTILITY REPORT FOR d J.F. Swanson Realty Oh, February 2, 1981 Harry S. Johnson Companies met with the Engineering Department of Eden Prairie to discuss utility service to a parcel of land located on Valley View Road (County Road No. 39) west of Washington Avenue. The property is bounded on the north by Brauns Estates, Norseman Industrial Park 2nd Addition to the east, Norseman Industrial Park 4th addition to the south, and unplatted property to the west. Information obtained and recommended to service the property is as follows: WATER There is a 12 inch water main proposed to be located 30 feet north of the north right-of-way of Valley View Road. This location is proposed in order to permit the ultimate upgrading and reduction of the present grade of County Road No. 39. The water main is to be located in an easement on Brauns Estates. An eight inch service is to be stubbed to the property near the existing entrance. Bids for construction of this project were to be let in February 1981. STORM SEWER Over R—Tiainage is predominately to the south and west. There is presently a low area located in the southwest corner of the property. A 48 inch R.C.P. storm sewer exists in west 74th Street. This storm sewer is presently located approximately 600 feet south of the southerly property line. We discussed the storm sewer situation with Duane Kramer of Rieke-Carroll-Muller Associates, Inc. Duane informed us that a connecting road is proposed between Valley View Road and West 74th Street. This connecting road would be adjacent to the westerly property line of the subject property. It is anticipated that the connecting road would most economicaly handle the storm water situation. SANITARY SEWER The sanitary sewer is located in West 74th Street also. The only direction the subject property can be sewered is to the south. There is presently a Five foot easement along the west property line of Norseman Industrial Park 4th addition. Since the property to the west is unplatted, it is felt that an additional easement, adjoining the above mentioned five foot easement, could be obtained on the unplatted property. The sanitary sewer could then be placed within this easement with a connection to r the existing eight inch main in 74th Street. I tt.:•• . •410 • ' 1 • I ' f• I . (.1) ...r: •. ._.11 • t • ( N. 1 r .. 14 • r,"•.. (14 . Is'i• 45 . 4.40 • \ . .v..,. • , :..t. 41 " ,..o,,i._ 4., •,:a-.• • • 3 1.vir.... • •...7:. te • 86* • SH•• 11.1..., • \ ''' S %.1 2 •ft• 2 \ L. \ i...!.1 0• • • • ,:jr c..,•,E. : (CO (7) 1•>1 a, i"Zi . a to 1 °1• .'..2 4 L2: k ‘ . vt,c,.., ,...... • - •44. t I • es) 1... ,s.. • _;,..,,...s.;•..L0,.•-•,,R9 r-k.---N(17,Wa i, . ' . -& —_ • . L A . 4411,4:h• h-1- .. I— . I 441 •:,,• , 01-.1.11-rr o.II •0 .. 1.: . ..•...*.„1* ...,Z.".• '4i.".••• X a I.. (..) III Cr V) . / .-•t• tr 4 ..,_.t. •,,,,....„, ., bpAt31-1•5 1 (",* ••• 2 S 06106.1.e5 . . 0 • CC • 1 I I-- 6 4 zt• . u) • z • ,,,4,..41. o . ( . .. • )16' 01 ..,...___z tte .i.i.,....::40 '1::---tirr-o--?:4"17:;1-.-'. . • • n (,) •!,,,1 1 . 0 • o - NIIIIIIIII4 Z z z_ 11,7-- ( • PI'2",/ C9 . ,1!)- VIEW-.'"--3--. '4E (0) liu) •. . Z ,,,...• W) ?... i I (,) #4 •-. 4:t. . . I zsurt,,arre.t, 1. *•• ._--- 1 coc2 - ! ' ."-• ---3---.,,, . r Peet?.Prf 5 . O . ''1-•1?,, ,, • 1.0 0' • Nt•P r' • ' • Et 11 i :,,:.. II 400'4, .. ,...° •.„ • , . 4t,••, ...., ...• ,.•--• , .a -,;•to 41h T 4: • .. —- • tow •4- . .4 i..47114 • ii, 4.• •-• 1,4 I : " • ,; (5) reoRres•V.D d A4V. •:''i WPM SW e/f.,:51,16i•IT-----I o,2". , • .• 8 roa.CA,14. • SEVIEP ,,i 1,- 1.% 41...**••• .2 . I 1.4100 ;,, .. •; Va. . •ote " ..,. J .... (31 : co 4 i At. ^t .a.*• I 4*- , • t 47 4. , Cit• * . 0 3 Allel.Hi •• . ' ...... _. . I • ( i . • CO . . ' 00) (40 1.44 0.4 1 CV . (ai . , 1 • • IRMO S.91111.41N1, • • 1.4.411141911994 CC , . ..... DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1 320 Washington Av. South k �. Minnesota 55343 '� Hopkins, `'••«°, • HENNEPIN 935-3381 March 25, 1981 • Mr. Chris Enger Director of Planning City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Mr. Enger: RE Proposed Plat - "Valley Place Offices - Revised 3-5-81" CR 39 Approximately 1500' W. of Washington Avenue - South side of CR 39 Section 12, Township 116, Range 22 Hennepin County Plat No. 894 Revised Review and Recommendations Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and found it acceptable with consideration of these conditions: -The developer should dedicate an additional 17 ft. of right of way making the right of way 50 ft. from the center of County Road 39. -The proposed access shown on the 3-5-C1 layout meets minimum sight distance requirements and the location is acceptable of Hennepin County. However, we feel to improve sight distance to the east and to reduce impact when County Road 39 is regraded in this area we prefer the access moved near the west property line. The developer must construct the driveway with a right turn lane and a by-pass lane (Attachments 1 & 2). The by-pass lane may only be an extension of the right turn lane into Braun's Fashions, Inc. Any new access to a county road requires an approved Hennepin County entrance permit before beginning any con- struction. See our Traffic Division for entrance permit forms. -To eliminate storm drainage onto County Road 39 the developer must construct the driveway with a definite swale at the new right of way line with catch basins dropping into a cross culvert under the driveway. The developer must submit a detailed drainage plan to Hennepin County for review. -All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. See our Maintenance Oivision for utility permit forms. { HENNEPIN COUNTY on equal opportunity employer W8I Mr. Chris Enger - 2 March 25, 1981 -The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within • County right of way. Please direct any response or questions to Les Weigelt. • Sincerely, 1/ ? , M• ‘41, Zt".(e ames M. Wold, P.E. Chief. Planning and Programming JMW/LDW:pj Attachments { I l j Ba z ( 1 u3 V m A a W CC r " Z a I v lx w 4 vn CC ~ M U z z w N / W z I tz Q z J w 2 r Z 2 W W o I— z w N 2 O _ 2 O U Ct w a w a gt ( ~ h 1 N -V j I. Q + 2 V m W 11u. u Q• t I• ,£ N z O iri W z Z W . Q 2 O 1 J ° o I N ( !) w u) G . 2 I 2 >- � m W i K • • W a a o . . ,;(1 • 6 March 1981 • • • Mr. Neil Brastad Inn Management, Inc. 405 South Eighth St. Minneapolis, MN, 55410 • • Re: Valley Place Offices Dear Mr. Brastad, As we discussed yesterday, the enclosed site plans are for your considera- tion of our request to make use of the green area between your parking lot and your west property line during installation of sewer to our property. The sewer would be constructed in the easement along your property line, and the additional space is required for vehicle movement and excavation purposes. The land would be reutrned to its present state following con- struction. We are expecting th request installation of the lines by the city this summer, and the work would be performed by the city. We wished to estab- lish the availability of working room prior to making the application. You may discuss this further with the city engineer, Mr. Jolie, or the city planner, tir. Enger, with whom we have already discussed the proposal. Your timely attention and response would be appreciated. Yours truly, • William A. Jacobson cc: Jim Peterson, Phillips Tempo Co. Chris Enger, City Hall • 13S •r�r� DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION •, --7 320 Washington Av. South `k , ( Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 •••• • • HENNEPIN 935-3381 February 12, 1981 Mr. Chris Enger Director of Planning City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Mr. Enger: RE Proposed Plat - "Valley Place Offices" CR 39 Approximately 1500' West of Washington Ave - So. Side of CR 39 Section 12, Township 116, Range 22 Hennepin County Plat No. 894 Review and Recommendations Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and found it acceptable with consideration of these conditions: 1, -The developer should dedicate an additional 17 ft of right of way making the right of way 50 ft from the center of County Road 39. -Because the short frontage onto CR 39 puts the driveway spacing too close, and due to the limited sight distance from the proposed easterly access, Hennepin County will permit only one 26' minimum width access to CR 39. The proposed westerly access is acceptable to Hennepin County. The developer must construct the driveway with a right turn lane and a bypass lane (attach- ments 1 & 2). The bypass lane may only be an extension of the right turn land into Braun's Fashions, Inc. Any new access to a county road requires an approved Hennepin County access permit before construction begins. See our Traffic Division for entrance permit forms. -To eliminate storm drainage onto CR 39 the developer must construct the driveway with a definite swale at the new ROW line with catch basins dropping into a cross culvert under the driveway. The developer must submit a detailed drainage plan to Hennepin County for review. -All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and land- scaping. See -our Maintenance Division for utility permit forms. I HENNEPIN COUNTY p/ on equal opportunity employer 7l0 • Mr. Chris Enger - 2. February 12, 1981 -The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within County right of way. Please direct any response or questions to Les Weigelt. Sincerely, /1, l/ ;/ • 'James M. Wold, P.E. Chief, Planning and Programming JMW/LDW:pj Attachments • • • • • • • • (. y a m 13'• I. m ,3 n uso O 3 2 O 3 --1 m z• H t m C 1 X o Z i m r i ofn — _,) z x m z z a o a w � o Z o —1s. , . : xi -i I ( dO C s o , c N_ G�q z 400 U (. -1 q m . �o • I . ____ -2_. _ _ _ a) m CD 1 C \ m D m N 0 N o ; D m Z z m f co O z co I • 13' m , . z y z Ni o k n O < n V D T b . an rn 'O n v N zz J'l Law Orman COLLINS, Harr & ALLEN PRO►ESSIONAL ASSOCIATION ssa•U•URSAN NATIONAL SANK•UILOINO RO•ERT r. COLLINS •100 SCHOONER BOULEVAm] OEOROE C.Harr EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 TELErIWNE 941-9220 TEO A.ALLEN AREA Loos 619 REBECCA A.JOIKE STEVAN S.TABOUR TOOD H.JOHNSON • or e0UN9n. OEOROC A.KURTZ March 9, 1981 i . Planning Commission & Chris Enger City of Eden Prairie Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Re: Valley Place Offices Gentlemen and Mr. Enger: This office represents Herliev Helle and as such has reviewed the staff report submitted to the Planning Commission by Chris Enger in regard to Valley Place Offices. This letter will outline necessary background and then address specific concerns raised by the proposed development. Background As the Planning Commission is aware Helles own or owned all of the land surrounding the proposed Valley Place Offices. The proposed development is joined by Norseman Industrial Park Second Addition on the Vast and Norseman Industrial Park 4th Addition on the South. To the West is unplatted land. In order to plat the above properties it was necessary for the Helles to initiate the installation of necessary services to those areas, with assessments being made back against properties owned by them. The proposed development has not been assessed for either the sanitary sewer trunk which runs down 74th Street nor the storm drain system serving the area. At the time of platting of Norseman 4th Addition the proposed development along with the adjacent property (presently owned by Berman's) were specifically excluded from the drainage plan. (See attached Exhibit 1. ) The total assessment against all Norseman subaivisions and Helle unplatted land for the improvements is approximately $470,000. The general area surrounding the Helle propertry and the proposed project has been the subject of disagreements concerning appropriate road location. Of particular concern is the upgrading and relocation of Valley View Road and a North South roadway • • Planning Commission & Chris Enger March 9, 1981 Page Two through the area. It is my understanding that there is now in its • final stages a study in regard to the North South roadway and that the recommendation will likely closely follow the highlighted right-of-way shown in Exhibit 2 attached hereto. That road alignment was subject to a Developers Agreement between the Helles and the City in 1977 whereby the Helles agreed not to build on { that proposed right-of-way for a two-year period within which time a study was to have been completed. (The study was not completed • and the Agreement is no longer in effect.) In any event, the apparent location of the North South route is to be closely aligned and perhaps touch upon a portion of the proposed development. Zoning Change The property in question is depicted in the guide plan as being industrial. The Helles have no objection to the variance from the guide plan to allow office development, but this variance should allow other property owners in the area to develop their property accordingly. Timing of Development { In the approval of Norseman Fourth Addition, the City required that any further development to the West of Norseman Fourth would require connection of 74th and Valley View Road. What the City was apparently seeking with this prohibition on future developments was a solution to the future North South and interconnecting road systems in the area before allowing additional traffic pressure to create an unworkable and potentially hazardous situation in the Valley View Road, Washington Avenue and County Road 18 area. The proposed development will create additional traffic pressure. Thus, prior to any development as proposed, there should be finalization of the realignment of Valley View Road; acknowledgement of that realignment by the developers and agreement by them to join in all necessary assessments to assure expeditious completion of the roadway. Utilities 1. Sanitary Sewer. (a) Cost. Because the developers never participated in trunk line development into which they propose placing their sewage, there should be some allocation and adjustment of trunk line cost with a proportionate rebate or adjustment to those who paid to have the line installed. • Planning Commission & Chris Enger March 9, 1981 Page Three i • (b) Placement. Given the timing discussion above the sanitary sewer should be placed in the newly realigned Valley View Road which will eventually join 74th Street and the sewer line. This will serve two (2) purposes: (i) maximization of service to the area adjacent to the newly aligned roadway avoiding duplicity of lines; and (ii) avoid having to take unnecessary utility right-of-way from private property at additional cost to the City and unnecessary disruption to private owners. • 2. Storm Sewer. (a) Cost. As is shown by the attached Exhibit 1 there was an intentional exclusion of the proposed development from the service and assessment area. Thus, if any portion of the proposed development drains to existing storm system (either overland or through storm drain pipes) there must be an adjustment by rebate or reallocation of storm sewer costs to reflect their use of the system. (b) Placement. As with the sanitary sewer, it would be best if the area were to drain to 74th Street for the reasons given above. The property was excluded previously, presumably because there was no drainage into the new storm system. Thus establishment of a drain system along Valley View Road' would be the most natural and appropriate means of handling storm water run off. • Conclusion Any recommendatin from the Planning Commission and the Planning • Office in regard to Valley Place Offices should therefore include: 1. That no development of the site or approval therefor take place until such time as the Valley View Road alignment is settled and that the developers agree to fully participate in any costs of such project. 2. That all sanitary sewer be placed in the right-of-way to be obtained for the newly aligned Valley View Road and that connection with the trunk be predicated on proportionate cost - sharing by the developers. • Planning Commission and Chris Enqer March 9, 1981 Page Four • 3. That storm drainage be taken care of by an independent system draining toward the North and Valley View Road. Very truly yours, COLLINS 110FF & ALLEN, P. A. • • 1 f GCH:cjm • • , 1 • 1 EXHIBIT 1 "A k. NOl ON1H57:M�1 ......r tt,'i.sS..r..,14.!,:''.:'',,i ik,.e'..,W.:' ,y„ ,,. Atli j jrS ,3 v "..;a �'ar Iir :C.' xYg � to :i::.\:•.,, ,‘,,''•,'' ! 1-.1 is•C''':.•1•:: i !, •,. . . : ;, 01 •01 • I v a h��'. .'. w „ , ..‘ ‘ • . ,,,,,, v NNtld -A;yi,n^.4 e a II \ F ' .."\\ CM g Noillaav L 1— 0b0 g NLIyd+ UN! NS'PoSLION Ui •7� i$ r • Cr CrL o I I 61 ♦ —_�� ——— I I———. 1 1I d7• _L_ i rt t& I m I �_ UIK cr ir!, W ►=uW+ ga �t 7 EXHIBIT 2 • . i i } .--1,11 -, •--. ........ . .. ...111 I 'N.\''''Zi . --"..f.:••••'-i--- -''"-(..... ,•) •-... -..........• -••••„... 11/4.. . • •- . • Is-,..z.,...,.'• ...----, .----..'''' .7--, " PN\ .• •\,\J. \,...\i , /..‹:•---- (1,-.'.-:./r.•••••.%, 1. ,.''...> el J` ,.../,..c.!j / \-:' •-•••• ';',', ! ri A.:\ 1 , /,,,, „i•-• •:::‘,....,1,-.) • , t ___.... .., i - (11 //,. - - ,-:•.- -,--:z.--..,:," tti /!; ..:.., ii • 14(.4. , ,,,, , . 1/. . _._.\,ti,n,__, __ III.;,4 s_.? (i--. . ;••,,..\•,,,,.„.,) II 1 ' --------- i dZ tjr t'i;3,.'''--,:••• la • .)...• •I 1-f:‘•-:-..:- '-.- ,.\ :.:--.---1\- ,, - . ., -1.•- ..'\,..._;)\*1 71-71-71.CL:) ' -- e N•...? '',. : /, ......, , ,...,. '7 s:•.,,......—,\\ •,,,....:: ‘....,`.&4.ft.i.iiimoeiim• . .E , • /.,, .., ,..... .,_,...• -_,..--, r,..-.,,,:: 'N...r.,r q I- ‘ ...--- .---.* ;-5--.,4,,,/' ,.1•1. , -_„..,,v2., ,.)3.'.i ' ! il. 1: : .17 l,1; ' --•-`---',.)' ....' r•II . -v.... :; ,,,, , ...... ,----.... \\\.'\---__....-',-- •/. 4'.., ::;\.\, — --17 i:i ;, ,---.--,:-.• .1____ it 'I 1 -,__) ( N ''':' :1:,/7Z//':% ."•.,'S \'.77 • \')q. 1...1,11, • -.4'sl 's-'''4 .....,... ,if • . )11,fli ,• ,,. , - , -- ..,,..-1- \•• .1 .‘ t..-, . ,,,,. 10, -- .-,_,J1_„1.-2.-- -- \._,&./-z-(1,,,.\z / 11.., ---.11 • \ .....; 1.1 ' • - i •itil , ,.1 i':17-1...-.;-1.,'-\ „ 11„-L.1 • 1.-. -,;.,.....•4.. /,' 'd, ,,/,',.\.,‘ il, ; `„ ., i.•;;;,t/ g';!'i ,:a 1'') )1\ -si . \ .. It :)...,,...,... , . ., , 4,c,\:. rzZ•:-.:. r; lit 'N ..f n sj a , :i.: -,,,,...,..5..„ ..‘...-...... .. • .43 ,, . r•-,. . =,-,. ,x-....-,\,•,. .. 1 '1 + ' 12.fr•-`,-. ill! • *(;)...•-i'.' i'-.' "")F,;) 1,,,,,'.",..1.), .• (/,',.,,--. --.......;;::,...„:„..../..... %'- --,t ,---- ---'1:-..:7---';' ..-- !7.1,.. •,..4':;,' 7' -,--- ..:..i. ' L-2--_.=:-...-..-,-- •)- i----.1-,), -z..e 'Is-.1 •.,-..1 i, ):. ;.•--2..•-• ‘.--.,---- ., , .„." \ :71,„ - , ,..t , . . ‘ -:I ,,f; i ',/•'' \ ''''-i', / '.l'. li,f /43. •I di i,,.' „'.. ..,-.....*: .•.I.-,,c-:-.,-.1 ,.••...•,'1 j :. .4/- (r. f s.,„; .;,' ..:-_-..y-,-z;..•A...• _,/ )'---/ , N. "%,..-,•.• , . s,'\,'1,i• 1/' I.—., ,,.,--), i,.);!- ...' • ,----/11, (---)1..----,•-,I,-.. '..15F.: 9%.'..?•‘,„. / /1%;*.Y• ',.. ...';'...71';',.../ iil i )l' '. .-- I, •••-= ft. ,. ''" ,- . .., : ' 1 • ,- ... •,• „, ,;()..; ,'_"-`‘ t(..27fi,. " / : '‘'''.."::.....:\ • ;-",'":"7:, 1 d',,." 0 ....:\ ,, „ •-• ----)) •,.. , ,, ••,...,.., ,...,..1,\(I //..,,,-7,.. ;',;- - .,( .7: ;•.,..,))„,',.'\ ' ;' ., 1 ,,,.•. .'.../12) !..i i: ',I:: • ' '''' -'1 J(1, /y/.,-.---, ,.----•:-.•_....-.:.1-.---- . ;Pc\',',/ )1,r.:1,,r(A, ,JJ..-,--y 0, : .- -- • ..-- ... . ...._.,..... ''• -,-,<%--- ....;.. ,,-.....i.: ..: . \.. iii.,...•. ;: ,.(6:-..-\"'..,._:-.- ..- ,,, .. .,,--- :----.----7"-N,:-_,--, ,------ .-..„-_-.--- --:,. , - -1:•4 — \ r;. '-.--=-'-7 \'vs:) :.::1:,....',..,7,...,,:i, .,,, \./ ,!< ''t., I -.=:‘,..fi 'Pa .7\si:,..1:421.:\,;•:':,i'l•-•:"..::_-.;- ,:. , • . , .. .1• .,, ', N‘l!. ''' 't ..,../......,1,2,0 ki '.....::--*, ....L. ‘...,.. \").' -.....,.....•-.•• -... ,:t---,k—\ri" .1- 41....,-.......' -.,' ' I .-._..,.. , ri.',.i. .. r:.''....*: •.-.../.,.(:,, ',3\,..A,\,:...'....•(,. '..Z. ; i 1;-,1K`., \,..i.." i''''' -- •• / t',.-... --r.\, -----/ ' it ,., fr - ••• , .,. r ' .. •i -,•-. -. - ., , _. ___-:-_': (i--i`.y. .,•%1',•• ...-7.---: .'!'•*......'\•17( '.j(C.--) ‘\ ‘':'''N."7-;) );\-t<)(\'fi,'!''''::;:,'__1°•:;-.----.1---:.:)'-::'-' - , / ,.---,..., -.....-..........,----ur ( c:-...-\--,-... •-• •::?---:--'•••----- __.:____,...„--...,.-_-:-:-...:^..:„.... ....:7."...,..,-,,,‘1,4 1'IfLILI,IT 111-1--- " -N,-_.'''''.""I'''''-- - -7; -,-..-- ' r--2-----7;',.:-:-.;,-;-.:-:-:.::.,...---_-.._-_,,-..--1 --.,..,•,,,... ..... ) .2-1 11.-----1 • II I ill'ill 11-1 I :"•7-. --:-.1:,:i1-:-.------.-;-.-.7':----•-•'. ''- .--." • . ..-----, e 9 • April 7, 1981 STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COI_ ; OF HENNEPIN The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows: 5252 VOID OUT CHECK $ (222.9", 5789 ED STEVENSON Postage-EPAA 252.5E 5790 NORTH HENN. COMMUNITY COLLEGE Fee-Police Dept. 84.0c 5791 ANCON CO. INC. Equipment-Animal Control Program 40.Oc 5792 _ KETCH-ALL CO. Supplies-Animal Control Program 68.61, 5793 VOID OUT CHECK 5794 OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. Liquor 1,573.3'_ 5795 TWIN CITY WINE CO. Wine 176.1: 5796 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. Liquor 1,950.3 5797. JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR Liquor 39.0 5798 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO. Liquor 1,239.5: 5799 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. Liquor 209.8: 5800 MIDWEST WINE CO. Wine 594.7 5801 POSTMASTER Postage 234.0..' 5802 KARP'S TWIN CITY SUPPLY CO. Supplies-Fire Dept. 19.5 5803 CARL F. BUETTNER WORKSHOPS Conference-Water Dept. 175.C, 5804 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF P/S Motor vehicle registration • 3.7 5805 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER Permit-Round Lake 5.0 5806 WILLIAM MITCHELL FORUMS Fee-Police Dept. 90.0 5807 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS SERVICE FACILITY Paper-Engineering Dept. 12.0. : 58Q° PETTY CASH Expenses 69.4' 58 . COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE February 1981 Fuel tax 250.8 5810 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE February 1981 Sales tax 2,054.7:: 5811 SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA Expenses-Senior Citizen Center . 70.5: . 5812 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLICE Fee-Police Dept. 15.0. 5813 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. Wine 379.5 5814 MINNESOTA DISTILLERS, INC. Liquor 1,351.0 5815 MIDWEST WINE CO. Wine 798.4... 5816 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. Liquor ' 485.4. 5817 ED. PHILLIPS &,SONS CO. Wine 806.0 5818 PAUSTIS & SONS Wine 119.6' 5819 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR Liquor 1,315.8_ 5820 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Payroll 14,022.0 5821 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE Payroll 9,963.0 5822 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS Payroll • 15,715.2 5823 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE & ANNUITY CO. Payroll 165.0 5824 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS Payroll 52.9,. 5825 PERA Payroll 9,945.1: 5826 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK Payroll • 150.e 5827 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Postage 393.6 5828 WOLFGANG H. PENZEL Expenses 31.5 5829 GEORGE TANGEN Expenses 32.9 5830 CITY OF FRIDLEY Service 173.2_ 5831 'HORATIO HORNBLOWERS Expenses-Senior Citizen Center 157.3 5832 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER Fee-Engineering Dept. 15.0 58r'" MCCLOUD COOP Poles-Park Dept. 200.0 58:. JOHN D. FRANE Expenses 146.3 5835 STATE OF MINNESOTA Books-Finance Dept. • 250.0. 5836 MIDWEST WINE CO. Wine 168.7' 5837 TWIN CITY WINE CO. Wine • 202.0: 5838 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. Liquor 2,323.1: *NO • Page two • Apr( 7, 1981 5839 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. Liquor 2,736.3" 5840 OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. Liquor 1,989.79 5841 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. Wine 598.37 . 5842 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. Conference-Park Dept. 95.00 5843 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. Wine 79.7:: 5844 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER Fee-Police Dept. 40.00 5845 THEATRE ROUNDABOUT LTD. Drama presentation-Rec Dept. 300.0_ 5846 MINNESOTA CHAPTER APA Conference-Planning Dept. 20.0,. 5847 A & H WELDING & MFG. CO. Steel brackets-Street Dept. 173.7, 5848 ACRO-MINNESOTA, INC. Office supplies 130.7' 5849 ADVANCE AMBULANCE & EQUIPMENT SALES Portable resuscitator, Airways-Fire Dept. 1,343.0 585Q ALDY GRAPHIC SUPPLY, INC. Supplies-Community Service 55.5 5851 STUART ALEXANDER Mileage 16.5, 5852 AMERICAN SCHOOL PLAQUES Chopper mitts-Fire Dept. 600.0: 5853 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION Books-Water Dept. 27.C, 5854 EARL F. ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Street signs, brackets-Street Dept. 522.6: 5855 RONALD ANDERSON Wired new squad cars-Police Dept. 510.C' 5856 ARMOR SECURITY INC. Service-Senior Citizen Center 82.5 5857 ARTEKA INCORPORATED Nursery truck-Forestry 204.E 5858 BRW Service-Valley View Rd. from T.H. 169 to 28,836.1 494, Schooner Blvd, TH#5 & West 78th Street & Mitchell Road, Anderson Lakes Parkway, Transportation Alternatives Study 58i AL BLASCHKO TREE SERVICE Tree removal 40.C' 5860 RAE BLY Supplies-Calligraphy Class 42.6', 5861 BOYER FORD TRUCKS Equipment repair & parts 48.1 5862 LANCE BRACE Equipment repairs 15.0 5863 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING Service-Shady Oak Industrial Park 5th Addn 3,294.4 5864 MARTI BREITER Conference-Fire Dept. 180.0' 5865 BROWN PHOTO Film-Police Dept. 38.0 5866 BUSINESS FURNITURE, INC. ' File cabinet-Finance Dept. 198.6_ 5867 VOID OUT CHECK 5868 BUTCH'S BAR SUPPLY Supplies-Liquor Store 127.9 5869 STEVE CALHOON Mileage 11.9; 5870 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO., INC. Wine 221.3 5871 CASE POWER & EQUIPMENT Equipment rental-Water Dept. & Park Dept. 1,50O.0 5872 CAROLYN CASSOLA Instructor-Guitar Class 1,215.E 5873 DENNY HECKER'S CENTRAL CHYSLER 2 New Police Cars 15,234.c 5374 GINNY CHAFFEE Medical training-Fire Dept. 100.0 5875 CHANHASSEN AUTO PARTS Equipment repair & parts 338.5. 5876 CHAPIN PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal ads 366.6 5877 JAMES CLARK Batteries-Police Dept. 11.6 5878 CLUTCH & U-JOINT BURNSVILLE, INC. Hose & Fittings-Park Dept. 142.3 5879 COCA-COLA BOTTLING MIDWEST Refund-Vending Machine License • 15.C: 5880 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. Pencils, Vellum, Sheet film-Community Service 309.0 5881 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CO. Desk sign-Finance Dept., Park & Rec Dept. 32.c_. 5882 CHARLES PAPPAS Expenses 500.0 58P' CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY Quicklime-Water Dept. 3,448.7, 583. DALCO Cleaning Supplies-Water Dept. 231.9 5885 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO. Hydrant flushing device-Water Dept. 359.P 5886 DORHOLT PRINTING & STATIONERY Office supplies 640.3 5887 EDEN PRAIRIE BODY SHOP Equipment repair & parts •40.0. 5888 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPARTMENT Conference-Fire Dept. 379.6: Page three ANC 7, 1981 5889 EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS Subscription-Engineering Dept. 18.0r. 5890 EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS Legal ads 451.61 5891 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT #272 Gasoline-Street Dept. 2,927.0: 5892 CHRIS ENGER Expenses 101.7 5893 ESB INCORPORATED Batteries-Street Dept. 210.2( 5894 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. Grates-Street Dept. 110.0 5695 FABRI-GRAPHICS Shirts-Rec Dept. 282.5 5696 FARMERS STEEL CO. Steel tubing-Park Dept. 109.5 5697 FEED-RITE CONTROLS INC. Sulfate-Water Dept. 2,622.0 5896 FLEET MAINTENANCE INC. Filter, bulbs-Street Dept. 70.7 5899 FLIGHT TRANSPORTATION CORP. Expenses 1,064.E 5900 FLOYD SECURITY Service-Alarm System for Liquor Store 200.7. 5901• FLYING CLOUD SANITARY LANDFILL Service-Community Service 166.0 5902 STUART FOX Mileage 37.6 5903 GT COMMERCIAL SERVICES, INC. Bike trail sweeping-Park Dept. 330.0 5904 GALAXY DEVELOPMENT Refund-MIDB Cancelled 500.0 5905 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Equipment repair & parts 409.3 5906 GLOBAL EQUIPMENT CO. Vertical bar rack-Water Dept. 102.5_ 5907 FERNANDO GONZALEZ Overpayment special assessments 50.2 5906 GOPHER SIGN CO. Hydrant markers-Water Dept. 565.2 5909 W. W. GRAINGER, INC. Meter-Sewer Dept. 104.F 5910 WES GROTWASSINK Basketball scorekeeper 94.5 5911 GUNNAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC. Electrical repair-Water Dept. 55.4 591' JACK HACKING Expenses-Police Dept. 63.3 591,, CHUCK HARDY Umpire-Rec Dept. 25.0 5914 HARMDN GLASS Windshield-Police Dept. 131.6_ 5915 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment-Street Dept. 24.1` 5916 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER January & February 131 Equipment Rental 4,510.c 5917 HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIRECTOR February Service-Tree debris removal 390.0 5918 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Bolts & nuts-Street Dept. 274.2 5919 HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION Board of Prisoners 483.0; 5920 HONEYWELL INC. Service-Water Dept. 1,367.5 5921 HONEYWELL INC. Service-Water Dept 6,700.0 5922 HOPKINS DODGE SALES, INC. Equipment repair & parts 121.5_ 5923 HOPKINS PRINT SHOP, INC. Printing-Senior Citizens Center 123.1': 5924 W. K. HORNIG Expenses-Engineering Dept. 6.9 5925 HOT SAM COMPANY Refund-Food handlers license 116.6 5926 HAL HDUGHTON Basketball scorekeeper-Rec Dept. 94.5 5927 HYLAND HILLS SKI AREA Ski lessons-Rec Dept. 1,466.0. 5928 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC OF ARSON Dues-Fire Dept. 20.0 5929 IAAO Dues-Assessing Dept. 50.0.. 5930 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC. OF CHIEFS Dues-Police Dept. 35.0' 5931 JONES CHEMICALS, INC. Insecticide-Park Dept. 200.0 5932 JOURNEY SPORTS Instructor-Rec Dept. 252.0 5933 PHIL JUAIRE Volleyball official-Rec Dept. 60.0 5934 ED KAMLEITER, JR. Refund-Plumbing permit 15.5 5935 KAPAK CORPORATION Evidence pouches 71.0. 5936 MICHAEL KERBER Emergency medical training-Fire Dept. 180.0 593' SUE KUHL Emergency medical training-Fire Dept. 60.0 5938 BOB LAMBERT Expenses 104.2 5939 LANG, PAULY & GREGERSON, LTD. January 1961 legal service 7,860.2_' 5940 GEORGE A. LANGMACK Expenses .35.2, 5941 BRAD LARSON Basketball scorekeeper 94.5t at/a • • Page four April ', 1981 5942 LOGIS February 1981 Service 1,946.46 5943 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. Gutter broom-Street Dept. 2,041.47 5944 MAGNEY CONSTRUCTION CO. Service-Eden Prairie Community Center 116,321.00 5945 MAHAFFEY TENT & AWNING CO., INC. Tarps-Police Dept. 61.45 5946 MARSHALL & SWIFT PUBLICATION CO. Subscription-Assessing Dept. 65.00 5947 ROBERT N. MARTZ Expenses 129.92 5948 JAMES MCGUIRE Volleyball officials 260.00 5949 METRO FONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. April 1981 Service 83.16 5950 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION February 1981 SAC Charges 5,890.5C 5951 •METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION April 1981 Sewer Service 40,314.OE 5952 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION Sand-Street Dept. 35.00 5953 MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE CO. Employment ads-Park Dept. 70.0'C 5954 MINNESOTA FIRE INC. Hose bridges-Fire Dept. 792.9C 5955 VOID OUT CHECK 5956 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASS'N Expenses 35.00 5957 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER Overpayment of 1970 LAWCON funds 15,000.00 5958 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP Service 19.41 5959 M-V GAS COMPANY Fuel-Senior Citizen Center 253.7E 5960 MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY Service 1,880.77 5961 MINNETONKA COMMUNITY SERVICES Service 110.0C 5962 MODERN FLOORS, INC. Install counter-Fire Building 142.6C. 5963 NDREN PRODUCTS INC. Red lights-Police Dept. 134.9', 5964 NORTHLAND ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. Electrical supplies-Equipment Maintenance 20.62 596I NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. Service 6,826.61 5966 NORTHERN STATES POWER CD. Service 5.2 5967 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. Service 3,553.C„ 5968 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO. Service 428.4C 5969 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK OF MPLS. Bond Payment 600,318.1E 5970 CHRIS PALM Instructor-Jazzercise 267.21 5971 JOHN PALMER Conference-Fire Dept. 400.0E 5972 PENNY'S SUPERMARKET #25 Coffee-City Hall, Towels-Public Safety 79.8E 5973 PETTY CASH-PUBLIC SAFETY Expenses 13.0: 5974 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO. Tire/wheel Assy-Park Dept. 203.72 5975 PITNEY BOWES Office supplies 6.4` 5976 PITNEY BOWES Equipment rental 61.62 5977 PROTECT-AIRE Screen-Police Dept. 205.9` 5978 CHUCK PUFAHL Volleyball official 250.0C 5979 RADIO SHACK Battery-Water Dept. 4.6S 5980 REGISTER PUBLISHING COMPANY • Displays-Liquor Store 49.5C 59B1 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES Hose-Equipment Maintenance 14.0/ 5982 MARK ROBIDEAU Conference-Police Dept. 22.82 5983 MRS. ALEC RUTH Stakes-Engineering Dept. 87.5E 5984 ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY Conference-Community Service 27.7E 5985 SUE SCHULZ Mi 1eage 7..9C' 5986 KATHY SCHUMACHER Service 75.DC 5987 SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS Employment ads-Police Dept., Bldg Dept 179.4' 5988 THERESA SHIPP Refund-Rec Dept. 13.0u 59$0 SMILEY GLOTTER ASSOCIATES Service-Eden Prairie Community Center 6,399.6: 599. SUBURBAN AUTO ELECTRIC, INC. Equipment repair & parts 69.5' 5991 SULLIVANS SERVICES, INC. Service-Research Road 50.Ot, 5992 SUN NEWSPAPERS Employment ad-Police Dept. 47.5". 5993 SYSTEMS 3, INC. Repair tape recorder-Police Dept. 50.04 5994 THUNDERBIRD MOTEL Expenses 132.7f Page five • Apr( 7, 1981 5995 CARRIE TIETZ Minutes-Park & Recreation 47.50 5996 TOWN'S EDGE FORD, INC. Equipment repair & parts 146.41 5997 TRANSPORT CLEARING Freight charges-Water Dept. 32.66 5998 TRUCK UTILITIES & MFG. INC. Equipment repair & parts 119.98 5999 VOID OUT CHECK 6000 UNITED LABORATORIES Grease guns-Water Dept. 216.99 6001 VAN WATERS & ROGERS Chlorine-Water Dept. 258.8C 6002 VERMEER SALES & SERVICE Tree spade-Park Dept. 15,426.Oc 6003 WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY Valve-Water Dept. 46.05 6004 WEAVER ELECTRIC CO., INC. Service-Eden Prairie Community Center 18,477.0'- 6005 SCOTT WEINZAPFEL Basketball scorekeeper 94.5 6006 SANDRA F. WERTS Mileage 45.E 6007 WITTMAN'S MARINE SERVICE Rivets-Police Dept. 12.C, 6008 XEROX CORPORATION Service 1,584.E 6009 ZIEBERT OF MINNESOTA, INC. Equipment part .2' 6010 MAXINE BRUECK Mileage 4.7E 6011 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY Volt starter-Water Dept. 627.2: 6012 TYPE HOUSE+DURAGRAPH Supplies-Community Service 33.C' 6013 LANG, PAULY & GREGERSON, LTD. February 1981 Legal Service 7,620.2 6014 TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF MINNESOTA Service-Morely property/Staring Lake 43.5. 6015 JOHN FRANE Expenses 17.5 TOTAL $1,031,238. • • • • MEMO { TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: John Frane, Acting City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: April 4, 1981 SUBJECT: Petition for Stop Signs on Homeward Hills Road • We have received the attached petition form signed by 171 residents in the Bluffs West subdivisions. The complete petition showing all 171 signatures is on file in the City Manager's office. The residents are obviously concerned about speeding on Homeward Hills Road and they are asking for stop signs at the intersection of Homeward Hills Road and Concord Drive, as noted on the drawing. The Engineering Department and Public Safety Department staffs have re- viewed this request and we have spoken with Mr. John Musjierb, who initiated the petition. We have the following concerns regarding this request: 1. The petition is response to concerns about speeding problems on Homeward Hills Road which is an area collector street. Experts in traffic engineering and "manual traffic control devices" agree and recommend that "stop signs should not be • used as a speed control device and that if excessive speed is the sole problem it should be corrected through increased enforcement of speed regulations." 2. The Concord Drive intersection is not a desirable location for stopping traffic on Homeward Hills Road because the road at this point is curving and also the grade is relatively steep which could pose problems with stopping and starting in slippery conditions. 3. Present traffic volumes at Homeward Hills Road, Concord Drive do not warrant stop signs and there is no question about • which traffic has the right-of-way at this intersection. If unwarranted stop signs are installed there may well be the result that some drivers will simply ignore the signs or they will actually speed more in an attempt to make up for lots time at the unwarranted sopt sign. We have observed this situation in other neighborhoods. If the Council should decide to direct the staff to install stop signs an s• Homeward Hills Road, we would recommend that the intersection with Silver- wood Drive would be much preferred over Concord Drive. Silverwood, like i t Homeward Hills Road, is also a collector street which may eventually may connect to T.H. 169 so that stop signs most likely will be warranted in the future. Also, the grade on Homeward Hills Road past Silverwood Drive is much flatter and is not on a curve. *iU6 . i • • • • - 2 _ . Over the next few days the Public Safety Department will be doing saturation speed monitoring on Homeward Hills Road and issuing warning tickets. Most likely we will find that many of the drivers receiving warning tickets will also appear on the petition form. The present signage on Homeward Hills includes three 30 MPH speed limit signs from Co. Rd. 1 to Silverwood Drive and two 20 MPH curve advisory signs within the Bluffs West Second Addition. We will be prepared to discuss this matter further with the Council on Tuesday evening and to proceed as the Council deems appropriate. • CJJ:kh Attachment • • • �yG • • • Parch 3961 • 10; The :den Pretele city Council We, the undersigned, are residents and homeowners of the Bluffs blest • neighborhood in southeastern Eden Prairie, Hinresotn. We.are disturbed about people excoAi:;,• the 3C Afi'H speed limit on • Homeward Hills Road as it panves through our nci,:hborhood. ae a:•e co:.carre.: with the tra;ic co;sul.:eneun uhiel, night result `ro:a this situation because of the number of you•..;,children who live in our rcit,:.:.crhood. We believe that a three-way atop at tho intersection of Concord 'Drive and Homeward Hills 'toad would remind drivers of the residential nature of streets in our neighborhood and bring traffic to a stop before entering into our residential area. We petition the i:c'.en Prairie City Council to order stop sign: to be placed et the intcrsa:ticn of Concord give 11.3 1iorcw:::••3 hills hand, establi..hir.,• n three-;:n.,:. .top at :'r.•:t intc•rection. She .top !di:: or. id .cu;rc .:ill. ,,u•:c th(1, r .ep t:e-`fie ef_ en: ;•ii.,• er.. .1:cn leaving ti.e csi.;nauruccJ' and the stop al,;:: on ::uucord Drive wo:.ld stop tra:•:'ic befcrc it ehtero Homeward Hills l:o•:d. l - rry /�t��.- (63414 0_1)-at-K.,� d' ., .-1 -( • ". .„.e /Oa,1 b cd- 'I-,•i it le i ' (� 4 d�' /� 3-6 Ce-� (L r -7,9)(11' 0-1.... //5. ' .._L-.4 0.2,kr:7- & / /i .n. ,., _ . A' _? 2. so �� //.so 9 •....•-1�,c c . //S�J- �� 1 O i • , • )ISbl 1D� An x . . . . . , . • • • • , •. . . . .. . . . r- .•, I: • : • ' . . . . . . . 4-14-rt4.6-"- /0 3./2 t 75'44 io3 , on,- .bR• •\. /.•) 1039a /a y„ ileSae (62 // ro.t) 0/2, / '111,..z2i*zu_seAL,L.11' 7-tr PwAt za/3 1 '.11/ kt L �Jt i nnture ; ...1. ..:'1 .'fl:':.; r;-.� bC:.ore c.^.:Er2::. icvc. • /7/4;..,e4c.-:, X—D4‘ rsu e jg v,/ /d 179 - , . paRAT wr��l • • • ta 1 :1 . , ;11 1yt; ;� } • t \N•• y"•I bi G \ •t.i,,,, • G ..I^Jt .fi Z - OP,1• : ;,2 4 a:. t ... Ma ` ', 1'�/' a •• ,0 J3 ;■Jai,bJ71 y,a 1"•,•a •\�. •I+'i. :oa7, 11' 1 3*00. .- ... �•- .,•.t. • 0'4...' jl �+ .. !4 yu ;�I J fc' I/rP.�i90Jlt r leJ7 totes ••:�•' i�r ri;�I'•,J'y S+. y • ' 1 e \ ■ tl+.•..+.tea... ''�;iy ':iy `•.�, . i s•i� •�-: I.. -`• r `'.�,1`~'.f �'!'y..'•'Ypv pM'•ccr.: ... t Y,Ip.� . p • ;.a . •.1re 1;.^z -1..43. J .g1'rM `�- .. • i' /YtaN)77 1 x:. 6p `••••'",r . C/..11 'e J {t ' ..} • i.•. •; nta" '�,:CI,1 hi,i,•4J•y,.• :it wI g •. it u r. ..•—.- • ..,,,,,, . ..,,:,.. , . ,z.: i . . LL. ,• � 'KID',rrrl�t a. tw •�t .. • e 1� 1_o Z .(6.(M?o;i 1K•''i•:'••• '• 'e�utJe.t',1•''', *I i I • - '}t 1_ 71 \ t • 1 �/! •4r - l�p `u 1i -: .\ • iJ� 1` °i• 4 . ' I ,ill • ill. • .�� aj. J ,ice I �. • ..-_ V./`-:. W L LAKE RDAD • M�[C/YTk ML SCza • • 7 O q `w • lc •: ''' )(' lE It •t. ' Hui[141111). n. ``Ja' T SE � oLYMvill:If.. 4PEI ^• 4,,Ft . w, • one • r • BLOSSOM RD. ON 0,Pb4 .- PHAETON OR.n G ` q fr �'- �+ E* 6 a ...ss„....................................................4..... . '' :'7 '.. (I.:1 . • 4 IC ..if. °h ot,'M '' it elf • ��9f 10. S�v Q E. • ES JASPER LANE filfraltelk .:9,,..1 RR17TOL CART 1� !.BRIT TANY WAY I P f DINBUROW CIRCLE ! O.COI ONY COURT �' � r •. O.NFwpORT DRIVE i 7.BROWN FARM CIRCLE ' 1.SALE COURT SI 10.WIMBLCU'ON RE CLOUa �`�` `.�.`�-��y�/ II.ORCYFIELD COURT ,- al '. C g o o 0 Y, CO N N p N _ = — _, 7 8 9 I0 `ou9. • MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: April 2, 1981 • • RE: TH 212 Alternates • REFER TO: March 17, 1980 Citizens Committee letter Interim Presentation Pros and Cons from Citizens Committee • MnDOT Scoping Report At the March 17, 1981 City Council meeting, the staff was instructed to evaluate the pros and cons of the TH 5, Residential 212 alternate; and the "Unique Systems D" diagonal alternate. These corridors were recommended by the Eden Prairie members of the TH 212 Citizens Advisory Committee for further study after being involved in the Scoping Process carried on by MnDOT in 1979 and early 1980. Although the Citizens Committee rates the Unique Systems D alternate higher, MnDOT represent- atives termed the two alternates a 'push', and Bill Crawford, MnDOT District 5 Engineer rated TH 5 Residential Alternate slightly higher at the March 17, 1981 Council meeting. The Scoping Report was a fairly detailed preliminary report intended { to identify reasonable alternatives to be studied in an Environmental Impact Statement. The E.I.S. is,of course,the document which would go into the most specific study and comparison of the corridors. However, that process has been halted, with no indication as to when it could begin again. Lets examine the current facts: 1. At the time the Scoping Report was done, the E.I.S. process was in motion, that process has now stopped. 2. At the time of the Scoping Report the "Unique Systems D" Corridor was shown on our Comprehensive Guide Plan and is still shown. 3. At the time of the Scoping Report, the development of;CPT 2nd Phase, MTS/MCC PUD, and industrial property west of CPT,did not seem.eminent. 4. CPT is zoned and is currently requesting a site plan approval and PUD for doubling their building. 5. MIS proceeded with plans for expansion after the Scoping process had been terminated. There is currently a PUD request before the City consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • 6. The TH 5 Residential Corridor currently has the buildings which can be expected to be within the corridor. 7. TH 5 Residential Corridor was compared to vacant "Unique Systems D" Corridor. Memo-TH'212 Alternates page 2 8. The TH 5 Residential Corridor is as feasible and no more expensive than an empty "Unique Systems if Corridor. 9. The current requests before the Council may not wait the pending out- come of the "Schriber Bill". The Met Council Representative at the March 17, meeting termed passage of the Bill "not very likely". • ANALYSIS he Council has a number of options: 1. Designate the "Unique Systems D" Corridor on an official map. To be effective this alternative would require denial of the current requests and purchase of the property. It depends on immediate funding availibity which is not likely. 2. Designate the TH 5 Residential Corridor. There are no pending developments within this corridor, however, pressure for acquisition may come from the School Road Area. 3. Designate no corridor on an official map, east of County Road 4 but designate the north Riley cut off west of County Road 4. Since there is currently no sewer west of County Road 4, development pressure would be low, (for a time), and flexibility high. It would also eliminate the problems anticipated by residents south of Lake Riley and would help Chanhassen plan their corridor location. When MOOT is finally ready to proceed, the E.I.S. at that time would pick the best corridor according to conditions existing at that time. RECOMMENDATIONS The Councilcil erally has no support in funding at this time to purchase the "Unique Systems D Corridor. The CPT proposal places a parking lot within the corridor, not a building. MTS to the best of their ability, has re- tained the low open areas in the center of their site and placed mostly parking within the corridor. To retain flexibility the Council may wish to request phasing from MTS so that the commercial buildings proposed within the corridor would be constructed last in the development. The MTS expansion itself would be the only other structure within the corridor. It is thought that this would not be built until 1984. It is also possible that MnDOT could work with 200' of R.O.W. rather than 300'; this would help. In this way, neither corridor would be "closed" and the best corridor could be finally selected when funding was available. Therefore the staff would recommend option 3. CE:ss $6I • t 1.. Unique System.D ' A. Cons • 1. Wetlands - School Pond, Red Rock Lake wetlands. CPT pond 2. Affect Scenic Heights neighborhood • 3. •Affect Middle School • 4. Complicated intersection with 494 • • • B. Pros • 1. Corridor has mostly been kept open - what we have releyed • on for 11 years 2. Probably lowest land acquisition costs • 3. Frees the largest stretch of Highway 5 for local use 4. Probably least loss of tax revenue 5. Keeps the 5/212 junction at the MCA • 2. Highway 5/Residential A. Cons 1. Removes neighborhood and tax base 2. Takes High School track and football field even though replaced 3. Near Middle School 4. Forces City to put in better road system in Mitchell Road to replace 5. B. Pros 1. Avoids H.S. pond, CPT pond and Red Rock 2. Less bridging than Industrial or System D 3. .Cheaper 5/212 interchange 3. Highway 5/Industrial • A. Cons 1. Enormous potential loss of tax revenue and jobs if firms do not relocate in Eden Prairie 2. High acquisition costs 3. Affects School Road neighborhood 4. City will need complementary road system B. Pros ' 1. Saves neighborhood (doesn't want to be saved for this) 2. Saves H.S. pond, CPT pond and Red Rock 3. Less impact on School than Residential or System D • • j • March 17, 1980 i J. Mr. Robert Paine 1 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Transportation Building St..Paul, MN. 55155 • Dear Mr. Paine: • The Eden Prairie members of the TH #212 Citizens Advisory Committee • : have reviewed the proposed scoping report for TH 212469 prepared . by MN/Dot. We cannot support the recommendation to further study • the Mitchell Lake route. After consideration of the various locations for the future TH #212 freeway through Eden Prairie we have arrived at a definite preference. Wo have considered traffic movement, residential end business impact, environmental concerns and cost of'both construction of the facility and supporting traffic carriers and right of way acquisition costs. After considering these various factors, we have chosen the System "D" corridor east of County Road # 4 coupled with the Riley Lake north cuiridoi. west of County Rued # 4. This system "u" corridor should be modified by moving it northerly where it crosses County Road # 4 so that the impact on the school pond and Red Rock Lake low— lends can be minimized. As a second choice we fool that the TH 0 residential route coupled with Riley Lake north route would be the next most foaoiblo location. We have chosen those two routes as those to recommend further study on for the following reasons: "ill .( 1. Tho preferred route allows the most direct movement through Eden Prairie with the least disruption of ...1existing roadway systems. 2. This route provides the least disruption of residences and businescoa and the Toast right of way acquisition • • cost because the corridor hes been somewhat roserved • since adcption of the 196E guide plan. "Il 3. It loaves the TH #5 syetom still workable, which provides _ a valuable link between the Edon Prairie Cantor and Chanhassen. 4. This route does not disrupt the industrial and commercial buoinusn along TH #5 and does not roquiro construction of frontage roads along the TH #5 corridor which would olimineto a major amount of Edon Prairie industrial and conimorciol buainuas and about ton homes. I5 1 .. . • I Mr. Robert Paine Page 2 5. . This route provides the least impact to the residential neighborhood east of the tracks and north of the school.' 6. Construction cost and right of way acquisition cost for this route is several million dollars leas then other ' • alternatives. •• 7. The preferred route eliminates the major disruption of• • the Mitchell Lake area required by construction of a freeway and frontage roads through this-environmentally sensitive area. TN #5 Mitchell Lake route will, in our • opinion. require extreme disruption of both the lake end the lowland north of the lake because of the need to provide frontage reads'which will be needed to accomodate • • • local movement between Chanhassen and Eden Prairie. • . I • • 8 Ae a second choice, TH #4 Residential will require acquisition of the homes eaet of the tracks which will , . be made unmarketable if either TH #5 Mitchell Leke or k •TH #5 Industrial are used. The TH.#5 residential route requires lees disruption of industry end business than oithor TH #5 Mitchell Lake or TH #5 Induatrial. j9. The north Riley Lake route provides relatively easy acquisition and is the preferred route through Chanhaseen. This route can be used with either of the two routes . recommended previously. For these reasons the Eden Prairie members of the TN #212-169 Citizen J Advisory Committee strongly recommends that further study be made on the System "D" corridor modified at TH #4 and the Riley Lake'north • alignment as a preferred route and TH #5 Residential as second choice 3 alternative for TN #212 through,Eden Prairie. We respectfully request that the draft seeping report prepared by MN/Dot 'be changed to eliminate tho recommendation for further study of the Mitchell Lake route because it is an unacceptable alternative which should be eliminated from further consideration. Submitted by: • Edon Prairie members of the TH# 212-169 Citizens Advisory. Committee x • LI 0 `I . am o • • r _ ;h _ \.�^ / :/ Livia N4112:1. .. o z , ...it__ _ �_ V rl • ,4 I r ; aa. • �i�f u • V • w O CC 7o cc • o ,� wi O W O . .1111. t i <ir :w N of = Q NI I cn 4 (O A 1� O O = w =• e le Wso 111 CL }_ f • I " , \ 1 .j I i —1,\--::_ii-i,.-4L'.,..:,... • I NId3MN3N \ �\ �i JJ �\ Z .31 , . , Di [0 . ,.. ,..... u,..4,4_,T,_,.., .:, .. .. ,,, _.__, ,.1 • i U y JI O � ` i.1 SGL INCORPORATED 8824 WEST 68th STREET MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55435 612/641-3888 March 27, 1981 Mayor Wolfgang Penzel Council Members City of Eden Prairie 8950 County Road 4 Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 Subject: Highway 212 Corridor Gentlemen: Enclosed please find a layout of 9.3 acres of land that is currently being purchased by my wife and myself. We have a considerable investment oammitted on this property at this time. We purchased this property in late 1979. The seller was St. Olaf College. At the time of purchase we were told of the possible use of this land for highway #212. However this consideration, we were told, was the same consideration since the early 1960's. In early 1980 we began to plan for construction. We met with city planning staff and were told that the city was not in a position to deny zoning because of contemplated highway useage. We then proceeded to draw preliminary plans for an office and warehouse structure of 120,000 square feet. The zoning to be granted was initially dis- cussed as I-5. Later we were told that possibly other zoning could be obtained. After plans were drawn, I began to look for occupants and financing. A11 avenues seemed to come to a dead end because of (a) no visible access and (b) the question of "What will happen when the 212 corridor is finalized?" When I heard that CPT was going to construct the now approved facility, I felt that we would gain access. CPT, Eaton and I had a meeting and reached a gentlemen's agreement as to the road structure and construction. I then heard the MI5 plans were delayed because of the State of Minnesota Highway Department. Prior to hearing of the Highway I had met with Mr. Maurice Wagner of FRS Mortgage Corporation regarding a mortgage and/or investor for our 120,000 square foot structure. Mr. Wagner has indicated that an investor/mortgage was available. At this time we engaged the appraisal firm of Newcorbe and Hansen to give us an accurate appraisal as to the land value based on proper access, zoning and - utilities. We now have our appraisal in hand. The value as stated is $605,000. 766 Mayor Wolfgang Penzel O aicil Neuters Marco 27, 1981 Page 2 As of the date of this writing, we have contacted and worked with the seller of the land, an architect and engineer, a nurtgage broker/investor, your city staff and a general contractor with when I will construct the facility. Mr... Mayor, you and the Council are now requested to render a decision concerning the proposed 212 highway corridor. Regardless of the decision, we 1.4.11 have sane direction as to our development. Naturally I would like to agree with Mr. Scheff of CPT as to locating the new corridor on the present Highway 5 right-a-way. P1Page keep in mind that we did not purchase this land only to have it condemned for road usage. We would like to consider o miencing construction with a year. Just a note, Mr. Mayor. It is a plPasure to listen to your clear, concise direction when you restate the motions of your fellow council members. We in the audience do not have to wonder what has been said. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully sulmi.tted, ita-e /7/ Donald M. Goetzman LMG:ng Enclosure • - d E�7 • • • • • O. 3 ACRES EATC)N C 13A C 1)T CHU I CH ' • air •, 4'4 LI_ AB. .4111111 ANOONIOOmMOIO • II MOS • I)ONALI)M.OOKTZMAN MYI.OT•13 IMY.ITYSNfh ✓11�8 On.MOO1•IIYlSf11 NO.WOO OmMYOIIa N 4I /1JM MO YIMM.P01YI MMO•R•WN MEMO TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Acting City Manager, John Frane FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: April 3, 1981 • SUBJECT: Petition for Improvements Hilger/Bearman Properties I.C. 51-409 The attached petition has been received requesting the extension of sanitary sewer and storm drainage improvements to serve the Hilger/Bearman Properties located on the south side of Valley View Road west of Washington.Avenue. Since the proposed improvements may involve Mr. Herliev Helle's property to thesouth and west, it is recommended that a feasibility study be pre- pared by RCM Associates and that, if at all possible, an agreement be reached with Mr. Helle regarding pipe lications and possible assessment reimbursements, prior to ordering the improvements. t Recommend approval of Resolution R81-73, ordering preparation of the feasibility report. CJJ:kh Attachment • 359 • April 7. 1981 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. R81-73 RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT ON IMPROVEMENTS ( I.C. 51-409) • WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed to make the following improvements: • I.C. 51-409, Utility improvements for • • Helger/ULARMAN PROPERTIES and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: • That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Enginee- for study with the assistance of Rieke Carroll Muller Assoc., Inc., and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and presented to the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment and feasibility of the proposed improve- ments. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, Clerk • 20 March 1981 Hon. Mayor and City Council City Hall 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota • Dear Sirs, By this letter we, the undersigned as option holders and property owners of the described property, wish to petition the city to provide utility services to our properties. . Sanitary sewer to be provided from West 74th Street in the ten foot easement between Norseman Industrial Park 2nd Addition and 4th Addition. This location runs south from the southeast corner of the Hilger-GJS property. The sewer should be run from 74th to the southeast corner of the Bearman property to provide service to that property. We have been contact with the owners of the Norseman 2nd Addition to enquire about use of the additional twenty five feet between their bituminous area and their property line for construction purposes, with the understanding that this area would be completely replaced and repaired following construction. Contact Mr. Neil Brastad, Inn Management, Inc., 405 So Eighth St., Minneapolis, 55404. We also request that the city make a final determination of where storm water runoff should be run. If storm sewer is to carry any part of it to 74th Street we request that this storm sewer be run in the same easement as the sanitary sewer. Thank you for your consideration of this petition. G S Development Chart N'lyer hill lam Bearn1 • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THRU: John D. Frane, Acting City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services t4.. DATE: March 26, 1981 SUBJECT: Swedlund Property • At the March 3, 1981 meeting, the City Council authorized staff to negotiate for an option for acquisition of the Swedlund property and to apply for a 1982 LAWCON Grant to assistist in the acquisition of that property. On March 12, 1981, staff met with Mr. and Mrs. Norm Behlmer, the realtors that have the listing for Mr. Swedlund's property. Mr. and Mrs. Behlmer indicated that the property is on the market for $595,000. The Council may recall that Mr. Swedlund offered the property to the City approximately one year ago for $400,000, provided that he had the right to live there free of charge for five years. Subsequent to that offering, in April 1980, the City received an appraisal on that property of $325,000. Mr. and Mrs. Behlmer indicate that they can provide appraisals showing that property to be worth much closer to $600,000 than to $325,000. At the March 12 meeting, Mr. and Mrs. Behlmer indicated that they were uneasy about entering into an option on this property mainly.due to the high amount of mortgage money that is on this property and an option would in affect remove this property from the market for the time of the option. Staff indicated to the'Behlmer's that if the City entered into any kind of a contract for purchase of this property prior to receiving approval for a grant, the City virtually eliminates any •possibility of grants for the property. Staff also discussed the various types of option agreements that could be used that would hold the property for possible grant approval and would benefit the property owner. An example is the Miller Park agreement. Due to the cost of the property and to the great degree of difference between our last appraisal and their listing price, staff would recommend • the City obtain two new appraisals. The City would expect these new appraisals to be within 15% of one another. Upon receiving these appraisals staff would then be ready to make a recommendation to the City Council on an option agreement and terms for acquisition. Staff would also recommend the Council authorize immediately a title search on this property. The real estate agent has indicated that he is aware of approximately $250,000 in outstanding mortgages on this property to date. He also indicates there may be more than he is aware of at this point. Staff would estimate the cost for each appraisal at about $1,200. BL:md • Wog • • l/ I MEMORANDUM • • • TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission • THRU: John D. Franc, Acting City Manger FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services ITAL.'- . DATE: April 2, 1981 SUBJECT: Round Lake Park Shelter Bids • • On March 31, 1981, the City received the bids for the Round Lake Park Shelter. • The City Council may recall bids for this project were received in February and later rejected. The project budget was $150,000. The previous low bid was $199,000. City staff met with the architect to make several changes to the project. The majority of the changes were simply in the materials used. The size and shape of the structure remain the same. The low bid received on March 31 was $149,775. The following bids were received: Completion Date 1. Jordahl Construction Co. $149,775 Aug. 30, 1981 2. KL110 Construction Co. • $150,200 Oct. 15, 1981 3. Henry K. Lindahl F, Sons $156,799 • Aug. 15, 1981 4. James Steel Construction $160,200 none 5. Superior 77 $163,726 Aug. 1, 1981 • 6. Kratochvil Construction $167,800 Nov. 1, 1981 7. Bud Johnson $168,790 Oct. 15, 1981 8. 11 $ M Enterprises $170,507 7 months 9. Earl Weikle G Sons $171,783 150 days 10. ABJ Enterprises $172,935 Nov. 15, 1981 11. C.O. Field $174,400 Aug. 1, 1981 12. Gary D. King Construction • $177,490 180 days • 13. Kraus-Anderson Building Co. $179,800 Aug. 15, 1981 14. Knutson Construction $188,284 Aug. 14, 1981 15. Klingelhutz Construction $189,950 Sept. 15, 1981 • 16. Dean and Associates $194,400 Nov. 1, 1981 17. W. H. Cates $196,100 180 days 18. Kloster Madsen, Inc. $209,400 Aug. 1, 1981 City staff recommends the City Council approve the low bid of Jordahl Construction Co., 16S40 Dayton.Road, Dayton, Minnesota for the bid of $149,775 BL:md • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council : • 'MU: John D. Franc, Acting City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services' ' DATE: April 2, 1981 SUBJECT: Staring Lake Master Plan On April 7, 1981, City staff will present the Staring Lake Master Plan as . approved by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commissiut. This plan includes the following development: 1. Picnic Areas - The majority of the picnic areas will be developed in the southwest portion of the park. A number of scattered sites are planned for this area of the park. i-' Each site will include a grill and several picnic tables. This portion of the park is a high wooded knoll with a • beautiful view of Staring Lake. • . 2. Park Shelter - A park shelter will also be developed in the southwest portion of the park at the crest of the hill overlooking Staring Lake. This park shelter will be a multi-use facility which will serve as a park shelter in the summertime and a warming house during the winter months. • -3. Hard Surface Court - This court will contain two tennis courts and a multi-use court for basketball, volleyball, shuffle board, etc. It will be located in close proximity to the park shelter. 4. Skating Rink - This European style skating rink will be unique to the City of Eden Prairie. It is an odd shaped enclosed track about 20 feet in width with a circumference • length of approximately 375 feet. This type of skating rink encourages people to skate in a clock wise direction on this "skating path through the woods". 5. Sliding Hill - A lighted sliding hill is proposed.in close • proximity to the warning house. It is located on the north facing slope for a distance of approximately 450 feet with approximatecy a 60 foot drop. City staff is recommending minimal lighting on both the sliding hill and the skating rink to lie completed with obtrusive decorative lighting standards and luminaires.L u�v 6. Playground - The playground site is proposed to be developed on the existing terraced field area approximately 150 feet to the northeast of the park shelter. The playground area will be especially unique in that it is located approximately 30 feet below the crest of the hill where the parking lots aro located and children will be encouraged to use a specially �to4 . -2- designed slide developed along the hill to get down into the playground. The major playground structure will be a wood climbing structure that will incorporate climbing, swinging and balancing apparatus. The play- • ground area will be somewhat enclosed by berms and it will also offer • a largo sand play area for younger children as well as a cable ride for older children. 7. Volleyball Court - A sand volleyball court will be located adjacent to the playground site. 8. Wading Beach - Staring Lake is not an ideal lake for swimming due to the quality of water and weedy conditions during the mid and late summer months. However, staff have noticed many families using the existing natural sandy beach on the southwest shore as a place for young children to wade into the water as well a sun bathing area. Staff would recommend developing this beach for this limited use. 9. Archery Range - Staff proposes developing Eden Prairie's first archery range in an area of the park that has good access but will not conflict with other uses. The archery range is proposed to be developed on an existing plateau located about 250 feet west of the volleyball court. The City will provide excelsior bales located in front of the steep bank. Archers must provide their own target faces • that they may attach to these excelsior bales. The archery range will provide approximately a 60 yard level range. 10. Softball Field - A softball field located southeast of the warming house/picnic shelter will not be scheduled for organized team use, but will remain open for groups that have reserved the picnic shelter or for general public . use. • • 11. Bicycle Trails - This plan shows the existing bicycle • trail adjacent to County Road 1 connected to a trail system that will completely circle the lake. This trail crosses Metropolitan Airports Commission property as well as Hennepin County Vo-Tech property and will requrie two crossings of Purgatory Creek. Upon approval by the City Council, this plan would then be forwarded to the Metropolitan Airports Commission and Hennepin County Vo-Tech for trail easement approval. 12. Cross Country Ski Trails - Cross country ski trails are also depicted on this plan running from the warning house in the • • southwest part of the park following the entire lakeshore adjacent to the bicycle trail. These trails will not require any grading and will simply be mowed late in the fall and a track set and groomed during the winter months. • • • 6o • • -3- 13. Equestrian Trail - The equestrian trail depicted by the elongated dashed line shows access from County Road 1 and from Mitchell Road. This trail also follows the shoreline.around'Staring Lake. Staff does have some concerns regarding possible conflicts of this trail with other trail uses both at the creek crossings and along the north and westerly portion of the lakeshore due to a narrow strip of land between the lakeshore and Research Road and Mitchell Road. 14. Senior Citizen Center - The existing facility is also shown on the park plan. The Center is located on the wooded peninsula on the north shore of the lake. • 15. Softball Fields - The two existing softball fields located on the Grill property arc also shown on this park plan as well as the Grill house and proposed historic site. , 16. Day Camp - North of the Grill house and ballfields is an open area in the woods located on the plateau high above Purgatory Creek. Staff feels this area offers future development possibilities , for a day camp site. It could also be used a large group picnic facility and site for limited overnight camping by supervised groups such as Boy Scouts, etc. 17. Boat Launch - The existing DNR controlled boat launch site is depicted on the northwest shore of Staring Lake. This boat launch site is in fairly poor condition and the City should encourage the DNR to improve this launch site as Staring Lake is a fairly good fishing lake for crappies and northerns and has seen an increased amount of use over the last few years. 18. Future Expansion - This plan does not depict the proposed future expansion of the Boyce and Janikula properties. These two properties remain as proposed future expansion parcels and will be developed in the future as picnic sites. The City is presently going through torrens proceedings to improve the title on the property. If anyone of the persons notified decides to make a claim against this property, the torrens proceedings could take up to one year in court. If this happens the development of ' Staring Lake Park will be delayed until 1982. If there is no claim, the City will complete the majority of this development during the summer of 1951. City staff requests review and approval of this plan so detailed plans and specifications may be completed and be ready for advertising as soon as the City has clear title. • • { • • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council TNRU: John D. Frane, Acting City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: April 2, 1981 SUBJECT: Appeal-Riley Lake Attached is a letter from Rick Rosow dated March 23, 1981 referring to the City's appeal of the Metropolitan Council's designation of Riley Lake Park as a regional park. Mr. Rosow explains the rationale for recommending that the appeal process be dropped at this point and that the City pursue its request for an amendment to the Metropolitan Systems Plan. City staff requests authority to forward a letter to Charles { Weaver, chairman of the Metropolitan Council, indicating that • • the City is dropping the appeal process at this point and is pursuing a request for the amendment of the Metropolitan System Plan to change the designation of Riley Lake Park from a regional park to a community park. BL:md • • • • . • • lD/SI SI•.o,s, LAW DIP IOSU LAND). PAULY a OREOER•ON. LTD. 410S IDS CENTER MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 6540E T I.UN■ A.PAULY • DAVID M. OREOERRON • • R.?MOMA% .JR. RICHARO I.ROOMY I.AWRENCC J.RROOLUNO March 23, 1981 • Mr. Robert Lambert . City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Re: Appeal-Riley Lake Dear Mr. Lambert: . I have reviewed the matter of the city's appeal of the Metropolitan Council's designation of Riley Lake as a regional park. I am informed by Barb Seimess that the Metropolitan Council will take action on Thursday, March 26, 1981 to correct the Council's previous review of the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Plan to indicate that the plan is in accordance with the Metro- politan Council System Plan as of January 1, 1978. I am told this will be done by council resolution and pursuant to a staff report recommending that the Council remove from its previous report the requirement of plan modification as it relates to Riley Lake. • The question of whether the appeal is moot, however, hinges on the determination of whether the Metropolitan Council has required Eden Prairie to modify its comprehensive plan in this regard based on noncompliance with the Metropolitan System Plan adopted subsequent to January 1, 1978. . 1 am informed that there is no other action of the Metropolitan Council that presently requires Eden Prairie to change its plan. Assuming the correct- ness of the foregoing statement, there is no need at this point to appeal. • I also note for your attention, Minnesota Statutes 473.856 which deals with amendments to Metropolitan System Plan. Pursuant to that statute, a local governmental unit must, within nine months after receiving an amendment to a Metropolitan System Plan, review • �l0 0 Page'-2- • its comprehensive plan to determine if an amendment is necessary ( to ensure continued conformity with Metropolitan System Plans. It is accordingly the local unit which determines whether an amendment is necessary and submits it to the Council for review. In this particular instance the Council could review the amended Metropolitan System Plan and determine that the designation of Riley Lake as a local park adequately protects the area for regional park purposes. If the Council makes such a determination and chooses not to amend the comprehensive plan, the burden would then be on the Metropolitan Council to independently consider the matter and determine that the comprehensive plan no longer is in compliance with the Metropolitan System Plan. Such a review might develop in the process of seeking funding to develop Railey Lake as a local rather than a regional park. Based on the foregoing I recommend that the appeal process be dropped and that the city pursue its request for an amendment • of the Metropolitan System Plan. At such point in time as the Metropolitan Council requires Eden Prairie to modify its compre- hensive plan relative to Riley Lake an appeal would be in order to determine whether the designation of Riley Lake as a local park rather than a regional park substantially departed from the Metropolitan System Plan or had a substantial impact upon such plan. ( If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me. ' • Very truly yours, • LANG, PAULY & GREGERSON, TD. • RFR:flc BY ichard B. It ( • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission • TIIRU:• John D. Franc, Acting City Manger PROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community ServicBs -� DATE: March 12, 1981 • SUBJECT: Revision to Eden Prairie Comprehensive Plan Review Attached to this memo is a letter from Barbara Senness, Local Assistance Planner of the Metropolitan Council. In this letter she indicates first of all that the Metropolitan Council will amend its plan review removing the required modification regarding Riley Lake Park. The plan review will state that the City will only conform to the Council's plan temporarily. The City must then request the Metropolitan Council to consider a system plan amendment changing the parks and • open space portion of the Metropolitan Systems Plan. The reason for this change in procedure is pointed out in her letter when she states that the scope of an appeal cannot extend to the question of modification of the system plan itself. In effect, the City will hopefully obtain the same results by submitting a request for a system plan amendmend to the park system plan at the regularly scheduled public hearing on the Capital Improvement Program for the Regional Park System. These hearings are scheduled for July of 1981. At this time, staff requests the City Council to withdraw its appeal request and instead request the Metropolitan Council to consider a system plan amendment to the Regional Park System Plan revising the designation of Riley Lake Park from a regional park to a community park. BL:md • • • • • • • • J ovitall . ), it ...,,,‹:[11 -1, . . 0 -a trot -k'IN C1,t,tt.. 300 Metro Square Building,7th Street end Robert Street, Saint Paul.Minnesota 5;191 Arca G12,291-G959 March 9, 1981 . Mr. Robert A. Lambert Director of Community Services City of laden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 , Re: Revision to Eden Prairie Comprehensive l ve Plan Review Metropolitan Council. District No. 16 Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 7765-3 Dear Mr. Lambert: . • As a followop to our meeting of March 6, 1981, l have summarized how Council staff proposes to consider Eden Prairie's appeal request regarding the classification and size of Riley Lake Park. • I•lp previous understanding, which was reconfirmed at the meeting, was that: the city's principal aim is not an appeal of the plan modification, but rather an amendment to the Council system plan for parks. `.. Given the grounds for appeal as established in the Metropolitan Land Planning Act and the nature of the city's appeal request, it would appear that a system plan amendment is the appropriate course •• of action in any regard. The scope of an appeal is limited to the Council's finding on whether the city's plan is inconsistent with the system plan. The scope of an appeal cannot extend to the question of modification of the system plan itself. System plans are adopted and modi.fi.ed through a separate process set: forth in another section of • Minnesota law affecting the Council (M.S. 473.146 and 473.147) . Therefore, as we discussed, Council staff is asking Eden Prairie • to withdraw its appeal request and instead request the. Council to consider a system plan amendment, this summer when the Council will consider other amendments to the parks system plan." This request • ( should again be directed to Chairman Weaver. • In the meantime, in order to allow the city to adopt its comprehensive plan, t:he•Council will amend its plan review, removing i?I . • .. ..., ''.....,Nu..1.Il.o rimming and 1lrvoht1•u,rltl of 11141'1'wln(:1tlan Mt.ttovolll.ut Ar'on('o.uprinlnll: ....,.4.....Mootun L'o„el v 'ill. • f Mr. Robert A. Lambert ,; 2 ,. March 9. 1981 ) 1. the required modification regarding Riley Lake Park. Although: the•systcm plan was amended in November 1980 to include Riley Lake • as a regional park, the system plan in effect when Eden Prairie's plan was reviewed indicated either. Bryant Lake or. .Riley Lake as a regional. facility, While the plan review will state that the ' city will only conform to Council plans temporarily (changes to regional system plans must be reflected in a local plan within nine months of their adoption), it is the Council's intent not to bold up the city in adopting and implementing its plan. • If you nave any questions regarding this matter, please do not -hesitate to call. Otherwise, I look forward to receiving the city.'s amendment request, so staff can begin to process the modification to Eden Prairie's plan review. Sincerely, Barbara L. Senness, AICP Local Assistance Planner BLS:im cc: William Sando, Metropolitan Council District No. 16 Chris anger, Planning Director • , • • • I ( . .l METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 March 13, 1981 • Revised March 19, 1981 • MEMORANDUM • TO: Physical Development Committee ; • FROM: Barbara Senness, Local Planning Assistance • • SUBJECT: Revision to City of Eden Prairie Comprehensive Plan Review Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 7765-_ Metropolitan Council District No. 16 I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY As a result of an error in'the City of Eden Prairie's system statement, the Council's comprehensive plan review required Eden Prairie to modify its parks and open space plan. The error in the system statement was discovered when Eden Prairie . formally appealed the plan modification. The following analysis explains the error in the system statement, the plan modification, the grounds for an appeal, and the solution to this matter mutually agreed upon by the Council and city stafffs. As part of the solution, staff is recommending that the Council amend its original review of the Eden Prairie plan. II. ANALYSIS On January 22, 1981, the Metropolitan Council approved Ehe Eden . Prairie Comprehensive Plan review. That review required Eden Prairie to make the following plan modification regarding recreation open space. "Riley Lake Park must be classified as a regional park, and references to the total acreage of the park must be corrected to 204 acres." In a letter transmitted to the Council on February 20, 1981, Eden prairie formally appealed the modification and outlined the city's rationale for the appeal request. • Appealing a Plan Modification The appeal request raised several questions including whether or not the city had grounds for an appeal under the terms of the Land Planning Act. In this regard, the scope of an appeal . to a required modification cannot extend to the question of modification of the system plan itself. System plans arc adopted and modified through a separate process set forth in Minnesota Statutes 473.146 and 473.147. The'scope of an appeal is limited to the Council's finding on whether the city's plan is inconsistent with the system plan. In researching this matter, staff reviewed the city's system statement, the parks and open space system plan in effect on January 1, 1978, and the revised parks system plan adopted by the Council in November 1980. The relationship of these documents to Eden Prairie's plan, as well as their actual content is •important in determining the legitimacy of the city's appeal. Eden Prairie System Statement • • The system statement transmitted information that the Council determined was necessary for Eden Prairie to consider in preparing its comprehensive plan. As part of the necessary • parks information, the system statement directed the city to consider Riley Lake Park a component of the Regional Recreation Open Space System (see Attachment 1) . As will be noted below, this conflicted with the parks system plan. • Parks System Plan in Effect on January 1, 1978 According to Section 473.856 of the Land Planning Act, • communities shall consider in their initial comprehensive plans submitted to the Council the system plans that were in effect on Janury 1, 1978. The Council likewise will use these system plans in reviewing local comprehensive plans. The parks ( system plan in effect on January 1, 1978, designated either Riley Lake or Bryant Lake as a regional park (see Attach- ment 2). Revised Parks System Plan The Council amended its parks system plan in November 1980 to include both Riley Lake and Bryant Lake Parks as components of the Regional Recreation Open Space system. • The Land Planning Act states that, within nine months after receiving an amendment to a metropolitan system plan, each affected community must revise its local plan, as necessary, to ensure continued conformity with metropolitan system plans. At the present time, the Council's comprehensive plan reviews are being used as the means to give communities notice of amendments to system plans. Council adoption of a review : giving such notice starts the nine-month clock. Eden Prairies's Grounds for an Appea]. Under the terms of the Land Planning Act, the parks system plan in effect on January 1, 1978, is the document of final authority for Eden Prairie's plan review. The system statement the Council prepared and forwarded to Eden Prairie should have directed Eden Prairie to plan for either Riley Lake or Bryant Lake as a regional park, but not both. Based on this infor- motion, it would appear that the city has legitimate grounds - 2 -c • • • for an appeal. However, if the revised plan was the one the city was required to address, the city would not have had grounds for an appeal since it would then be challenging. the system plan itself. • The city is• aware of this situation and has acknowledged that its major aim is an amendment to the parks and open space system plan. As mutually agreed upon with the Council parks staff, the city will request the Council to consider dropping Riley Lake Park from the regional system during the summer of 1981, when the Council considers other amendments to the parks system plan. Plan Review Revision The Council's review of Eden Prairie's plan stated that the city began preparing its comprehensive plan in 1975. The review also stated that the plan was suspended from review for roughly one year. Both these factors make the plan increasingly less valuable for the city. However, until the question of the required modification is resolved, the city will still not be in a position to adopt and subsequently begin implementing its plan. • Therefore, staff recommends revising the existing plan review based on the following factors: 1) The system plan in effect on January 1, 1978, designated . either Riley Lake or Bryant Lake as a regional park. Since Eden Prairie's plan acknowledged Bryant Lake as a regional park, but indicated it wanted to maintain Riley lake as a community facility, it would appear reasonable to consider Eden Prairie's plan consistent with the either/or designation. • 2) Although the Council has since decided to include Riley Lake Park in the regional parks system, Eden Prairie will be requesting the Council to consider dropping this from the system plan. 3) The Council will not begin to consider this request until July 1981. Since Eden Prairie is fully aware of the change in system plans and the need to pursue a system plan amendment, the major effect of this revision would be to allow the city to adopt its plan. In addition, if the Council drops Riley Lake Park from its system plan this summer, the entire problem is resolved. If it does not, Eden Prairie has nine months•from this notice to modify its plan to include Riley Lake as a regional park. • • T fJ - 3 - • / . III. RECOMMENDATIONS r • /( That the Metropolitan Council revise Eden Prairie's Compre- hensive Plan review adopted January 11, 1981, as follows: • A. Recommendation B should be revised •to read "No plan modifications are required as authorized in Minnesota Statutes, Sectin 473.175, Subd. 1." • B. Recommendation C.3. should be revised'to read: "The Eden Prairie plan is in conformity with the • metropolitan system plan for parks as it existed on January 1, 1978. However, the following amendments will be regired within nine months to ensure continued conformity with the Recreation Open Space System Plan: "a. The plan should be amended under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,473.856 to include Riley Lake Park • as a regional park and correct the total park acreage to 204 acres as shown in the revised Regional . Recreation Open Space Policy Plan (November 1980) . "b. The plan should be amended under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 473.856 to include linear parks and . potential regional trails as shown in the Regional Trails Policy Plan Amendment (November 1978) and (- revised Regional Recreation Open Space Policy Plan (November 1980). C: Other related sections of the plan review should be revised as shown in Attachment 3. BLS:im IM147A 1 • ( •• E - 4 •• �� 7 ( • • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council • • • 71IRU: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services • FROM: Stuart A. Fox, City Forester ciAc DATE: March 27, 1981 SUBJECT: Proposed State Senate Finance Committee Budget Cuts for Shade Tree Programs Senator Gerald L. Willet, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee has recommended that the Governor's budget request of :$19.8 million dollars for the Shade Tree Disease Program be reduced to approximatley $10 million dollars. The proposed budget cut would result in a drastic reduction in subsidies the City receives from the Department of Agriculture for participation in the tree disease program. Reimbursement would be 20-25%, instead of the current (1980) 50%. In 1980 the total eligible expenditures for the forestry programs was $127,775 and the City received reimbursement of $72,227 for its participation in the State's Shade Tree Program. The City has been a participant in the Shade Tree Program since 1976 and the staff has experienced difficulty in the past in attempting to estimate a subsidy percentage to use in conjunction with budget requests. The reimbusemcnt percentages have varied as follows: 1976-SO%, 1977-37%, 1978-28%, 1979-42%, and 1930-50%. • The 1981 Forestry Program budget of $182,700 included an anticipated subsidy of $72,000 (based on 47% of the $152,700 of eligible expenditures). If the proposed budget cut is accepted, the City could•lose between 22% and 27% of the anticipated 1981 subsidy. This represents a loss of between $33,825 and $41,460 to the Forestry Program. Staff recommends that a letter expressing the City's concern in this matter • be drafted and sent to the appropriate legislative officials. This letter should appeal to the legislators to support the Governor's budget request of $19.8 million dollars for the Shade Tree Program and not the $10 million dollars proposed by Senator Willet. • • G 0r)17 •