HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 02/17/1981EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TWAY, FEBRUARY 17, 1981
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL STAFF:
7:30 PM, CITY HALL
Mayor Wolfgang Peniel, George Bentley, Dean
Edstrom, Paul Redpath and George Tangen
Acting City Manager John Frane; City Attorney
Rick Rosow; Planning Director Chris Enger;
Director of Community Services Bob Lambert;
City Engineer Carl Jullie; and Karen Michael,
Recording Secretary
INVOCATION: Mayor Wslf.anPenzel
PLEDGE IF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
A. / Special Eden Prairie City Council meeting held Thursday. January 22,
1981 '
B. Regular Eden Prairie City Council meeting held Tuesday, February 3,
1981
•
Page 422
Page 423
ecial Eden Prairie City Council meeting held Wednesday, February 11, Page 432
981
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Reguest to set Public Hearing for March 17, 1981 for Municipal Industrial Page 434
Development Bonds in the amount of $350,000.00 for S. & D. Properties
B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 80-30, rezoning 2 acres from Rural to
Office for an office building_for Single Tree Office by Willys
Holmquist and developers agreement
C. Policy on Park Facility Reservations
D. Resolution No. 81-42, approving the final plat for Menard's Addition
Replat
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
77.--
A. Condemnation of Diseased Elm Trees marked in 1980 (Resolution No. 81-37) Page 454.
Page 435
Page 447
Page 451
Page 464 14TS/MCC Industrial Campus by MIS Systems Corporation and Magnetic
Controls Copally. Request for PUD Concept approval of indusifTif
and e&Tircial uses upon 158 acres. Located southeast of Mitchell
Road and TN 5. (Resolution No. 81-35)
City Council Agenda
Tues.,February 17, 1981
C. Eden Glen by Jesco, Inc. Request for PUO Concept approval' of
commercial and office uses upon 15 acres. Located between Eden Road
and Single Tree Lane, West of US 169/212. (Resolution No. 81-36)
O. Vacating a portion of Plaza Drive (Resolution No. 81-40)
'
Page 481
Page 496
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 5164 - 5353
VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
....TM 169/212 Task Force - Representative of the TN 169/212 Task Force
and representative from the Metropolitan Council to present official ,
TN 212 map for adoption by City Council
"d-64
A.
Page 49L6f
4,6*,/
VII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
c.'" •
A. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 80-27 Park Use Ordinance (Cont'd 2/3/81) Page 304
Page 504 /13,.; 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 81-05, amending Ordinance No. 248
adopting 1979 State Building Code
\C.) Resolution No. 81-38, final approval for Municipal Industrial
Development Bonds in the amount of-070,000.00 for Minnesota
Industrial Tools (RichardW. Cohen)
VIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
Page 505
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Appointments
a) Board of Appeals & Adjustments - 1 representatly.e-to-seve
a three year term commencing 3/1/81
' /1 ,4 , ,'.1 \ . 0
b) Building Code Board of Appeals - 1 representative to serve
a three year term commencing 3/1/81, and 1 representative
to fill an unexpired term to 2/28/82
c) Development Commission - 2 representatives to serve three .,
year terms commencing 3/1/81 --7-7,t,,,,l4.7) i 6-) ' 4')
d) Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission of Eden Prairie -
3 representatives to serve three year terms commencing
- 3/1/81 (1 from the Flying Cloud Businessmen's Association,
t .
1 from the Metropolitan Airports Commission, and 1 citizen__14 /Ai
of Eden Prairie)
e) HistoricalA Cultural Commission - 2 representatives to , se5e
__
three year termi -Commencing 3/1/81 AA,;IA ,0././-444
-,,, v- _ _•
f) Human Rights & Services Commission - 2.-represen ti ,es2 '
A L„,,,.
serve three year terms commencing 3/1/81 4 /
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission -
representa • serve h—ree- year7 fe-i-nTs &Zile-I:kin
3/1/81 c ,,, ,-;!.._. 7 t o....-
h) Plannino Commission - 2 represe tativ s t serve three 4..
year terms commencing 3/1/81 -,-
B. Report of 'City Attorna
s)
City Coypcil Agenda
e te-Th
O ) ;Report of A A City Man ger '
/( 1. tgpwr ,A
Utility connection at 15500 North Eden Drive
Tues.,February 17, 19817
Page 506
D. Report of Planning Director
. 1. Report on Metropolitan Council's review of Eden Prairie's
Guide Plan
2. C ty Hall Mager Plan
E. Report of Director Community Services
1. Award bid for Round Lake Park Shelter Page 52
F. Report of City Engineer
1.) Consider bids for water supply wells, Contract No. 1, I.C. 51-354 . Page 524
L,/ (Resolution No. 81-39)
.0) \
kle - - N3,1 Receive feasibility report and set hearing date for street'
Improvements on Hilltop Road, I.C. 51-380 (Resolution No. 81-41)
IX. NEW BUSINESS
X. ADJOURNMENT.
Page SO7
Page 521
Page 527
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
THURSDAY, JANUARY 22, 1981
7:30 PM, CITY MALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Dean
Edstrom, Paul Redpath and George Tangen
COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT:
Planning Director Chris Enger, Park Planner
Steve Calhoun, and Recording Secretary Karen
Michael
ROLL CALL: All members present
This Special Meeting of the Eden Prairie City Council was called to discuss the
resumes for City Manger. Mayor Penzel also requested two additional items of
business be added to the Agenda: 1) Resolution No. 81-22 approving Final Plat
of CNR Golden Strip East; and 2) discussion of site plans for a City Hall Complex.
1) Resolution No. 81-22, a resolution approving final plat of CNR Golden Strip
East.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to adopt Resolution No. 81-22,
approving final plat of CNR Golden Strip East subject to the requirements
of the report of the City Engineer dated January 22, 1981 and the Developer's
Agreement. Motion carried unanimously.
2) Mayor Penzel called upon Planning Director Enger to present various site plans
for a City Hall complex. Three plans were presented which lead to discussion
from which more plans will be drawn to be presented at the next Council meet-
ing on Tuesday, February 3, 1981.
3) Those receiving "yeses" on this round were: 1, 3, 5, 6, 21, 22, 23, 29, 30,
33, 34, 35, 36, 39, 44, 45, 46, 53, 61, 62, 69, 72, 75, 79, 81.
Letters will be sent to the above applicants as well as a list of the follow-
ing questions which are to be answered and returned to the City by Friday,
February 6, 1981:
1. What is the Manager's role vis-a-vis the Council, staff and residents?
2. What is your management philosophy?
3. What is your approach to budgeting?
4. What is your approach to labor relations?
5. What impact should local government have on residents?
6. How would you finance major improvements?
7. To what extent should City government be involved in encouraging development?
8. What are the most significant challenges municipalities will face in the 80's?
Drafts of letters to applicants who are still under consideration and to
applicants who are not to be further considered were reviewed. They will be
sent out as soon as possible.
A meeting was scheduled for Wednesday, February 11, 1981 at 7:30 p.m. to
review the questions which are to bc returned by February 6.
MOTION: Moved by Redpath, seconded by Bentley, to adjourn the meeting at 9:32
p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
422.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1981
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT:
7:30 PM, CITY HALL
Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley, Dean
Edstrom, Paul Redpath, and George Tangen
Acting City Manager John Frane, City Attorney
Roger Pauly, Planning Director Chris Enger,
Director of Community Services Bob Lambert,
City Engineer Carl Jullie, and Recording
Secretary Karen Michael
INVOCATION: Councilman George Bentley
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: All members present
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following item was withdrawn from the Agenda: VIII. B, Resolution No.
81-25, final approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount
of $970,000.00 for Richard Cohen (Minnesota Industrial Tool).
Held over to February 17, 1981 was item VIII. A. 1st Reading of Ordinance No.
80-27, Park Use Ordinance.
The following items were removed from the Regular Agenda and placed on the
Consent Calendar: K. Appointment to the Sewer Service Area Advisory Board
(formerly IX. A. 1. b.); L. Tax Forfeited Lands (formerly IX. E. 4.); and
M. Receive feasibility report and set hearing date for sewer and water im-
provements on Luther Way and Meadow Lane, I.C. 51-395 (Resolution No. 81-26)
(formerly IX. F. 1.)
The following was added to the Consent Calendar: J. Resolution No. 81-34,
Receiving a petition from The Preserve requesting vacation of a portion of
Sunnybrook Road in Olympic Hills 6th Addition and setting a hearing date of
March 3, 1981.
The following items were added to the Agenda: IX. A. 2. b. Warranty Work
by Contractors, and IX. E. 5. National Wildlife Refuge (replaces Resolution
No. 81-08 continued from 1-6-81 but inadvertently omitted from the agenda).
MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the agenda as
amended and published. Motion carried unanimously.
II. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, JANUARY 20, 1981
Page 4, para.
Page 6, para.
Page 7, VIII.
Page 10, para
change to
5: "Sorbick" should be "Sorvick".
2, line 4: change "proviso" to "provision"
3.: "Paul's" should be "Pauly's".
. 1: "Attorney" should be "Engineer"; para. 3, lines 1 and 2:
move adoption of" to "to adopt".
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the minutes of the
January 20, 1981 Council meeting as amended and published.
q.23
City Council Minutes -2- February 3, 1981
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 81-04, street name changes in Chatham Woods
B. Resolution Nos. 81-27, 81-28, and 81-29, regarding conformance with develop-
er's agreement for Shady Oak Industrial Park 2nd and 3rd Addition
C. Authorize bids for loader - Street Department
D. Final plat approval for Creekview Estates (Resolution No. 81-30)
E. Request to set Public Hearing for Preserve Center 3rd Addition for March 3,1981
F. Resolution No. 81-24, final approval for Municipal Industrial Development
Bonds in the amount of $1,160,000.00 for Eagle Drug.
G. Request to set Public Hearing for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds
in the amount of $1,500,000.00 for G. R. Partnership for March 3, 1981
Clerk's License List
Resolution No. 81-31, approving preliminary and final plat for Northmark
5th Addition
j Resolution No. 81-34, receiving a petition from The Preserve requesting vaca-
tion of a portion of Sunnybrook Road in Olympic Hills 6th Addition and setting
a hearing date of March 3, 1981
K. Appointment to the Sewer Service Area Advisory Board (formerly IX. A. 1. b.) -
(Gene Schurman was appointed.)
L. Tax forfeited lands (Resolution No. 81-32) - (formerly IX. E. 4.)
M. Receive feasibility report and set hearing date for sewer and water improve-
ments on Luther Way s and Meadow Lane, I. C. 51-395 (Resolution No. 81-26)
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to approve items A -M on the Con-
sent Calendar. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen, and Penzel
voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Diseased Trees Public Hearing
MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Tangen to move the date of the public
hearing from February 3, 1981 to February 17, 1981. Motion carried unani-
mously.
B. Basswood Terrace by The Preserve. Request to rezone 5 acres to R1-13.5
and platting for 12 single family lots; and rezone 2.5 acres to RM 6.5 and
platting for 14 duplexes (7 buildings). Located north of Basswood Road and
west of Black Maple Drive (Ordinance 81-03 and Resolution 81-33).
Larry Peterson, representing The Preserve, introduced Jim Hill of James R.
Hill, Inc. who spoke to the proposal and displayed graphics of the project.
H.
112LI
City Council Minutes -3- February 3, 1981
Planning Director Enger explained that this item was reviewed by the Planning
Commission at its December 22nd meeting and that it voted 6-0 to recommend
approval of the rezoning and the preliminary plat subject to the recommendations
in the Staff Report dated December 18, 1980.
Director of Community Services Bob Lambert stated that the Parks, Recreation
& Natural Resources Commission considered this item at its January 5th meeting
and unanimously recommended its approval as per the Planning Commission's rec-
ommendations.
Ann Kahn, 8650 Black Maple Drive, expressed an interest in seeing a pathway
system along Center Way from Anderson Lakes Parkway to Northmark.
MOTION: Moved by Redpath, seconded by Edstrom, to close the public hearing
and give a first reading to Ordinance No. 81-03, requesting rezoning of 5 acres
to R1-13.5 and rezoning 2.5 acres to RM 6.5. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Moved by Redpath, seconded by Edstrom, to adopt Resolution 81-33,
approving the preliminary plat. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Tangen, to direct Staff to draft a develop-
er's agreement incorporating the recommendations of the Planning Staff and Commis-
sions. Motion carried unanimously.
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 4969 - 5163
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to approve the Payment of Claims Nos.
4969 - 5163. Roll call vote: Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen, and Penzel voted
"aye". Motion carried unanimously.
VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
A. Human Rights & Services Commission
1. Resolution No. 81-14, defining responsibilities of the Human Rights &
'Services Commission relating to the review of human service proposals
Duane Pidcock, chairman of the Eden Prairie Human Rights & Services Commis-
sion, spoke to the Resolution and introduced members of the Commission in
attendance: Barb O'Grady, Bob Norberg, Larry Simenson, Steven James, and
Rae Bly, Staff liaison.
MOTION: Moved by Edstrom, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No.
81-14, defining responsibilities of the Human Rights and Services Commis-
sion relating to the review of human service proposals, with the following
change: last para. 3rd line: substitute "involved in" for "responsible for
Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes -4- February 3, 1981
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request from Mr. Laughinghouse, Deerick Land Company, for 4 building
permits upon RLS 0664 (Continued -from 1/20/81) ,
Kurt Laughinghouse, representing Deerick Land Company, reviewed the
request for 4 building permits. He stated he had attempted to make
contact with the three neighbors to the south via letter, copies of
which were sent to the Council as well as the responses received.
Mr. Laughinghouse is willing to increase the dollar amount to $750
for fencing and/or plantings.
Harold Auwerter, 15513 Park Terrace Drive and James Devore, 6428
Kurtz Lane voiced their concerns as adjacent property owners.
Mayor Penzel asked City Engineer Jullie the status of utilities in
the area. Mr. Jullie stated that they were constructed several years
ago and have been laying dormant since that time; but they were designed
by Rieke, Carroll, Muller who provided inspections while they were under
construction. If the City were to accept these lines at this time, they
would be subject to additional inspection.
City Attorney Pauly cited a recent decision handed down by the courts;
and stated that the City does not have a good defense for not issuing
building permits for this property in light of this decision. Edstrom
sees the Council's hands tied as far as legal stands go. The Council
is not in a position to say what was done in 1973 was right or wrong.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to grant the request of
Mr. Laughinghouse for 4 building permits on RLS #664 subject to require-
ments of the City Engineer's Department; up to 1,750 per lot to be provided
by Mr. Laughinghouse (Deerick Land Company) for screening; and that the
property owner clean up the property as soon as the snow melts. Motion
carried unanimously.
B. Request from Bev Cronk on review of New House Moving Ordinance No. 79-34
Beverly Cronk, 18895 Pheasant Circle, asked the question, "What is
considered a 'moved-in house'?"
City Attorney Pauly said that the Ordinance relating to moving of build-
ings simply refers to a requirement for a permit to do so. It does not
refer to a house and it does not define a building. A person seeking a
permit has to supply evidence that the real estate taxes and special
assessments against the building and the land from which it is to be
removed have been paid in full. Other provisions of the Ordinance suggest
that the intent of the Ordinance is that it be applied to previously
used, fully constructed buildings.
Carol Ellison, 18925 Pheasant Circle, expressed her concern that the new
State regulations override portions of the 1979 Ordinance.
Gary L. Nelson, 18129 Valley View Road, homebuilder and Dynamic Home's
representative, spoke about the quality of construction and the market
value of this home in comparison with those in the area.
Jon Jansson, 19130 Homestead Circle, expressed concern as to the size
of the home.
/rd.
City Council Minutes -5- February 3, 1981
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to have the City Attorney
Investigate statutes to find a definition for the word "building" in an
attempt to clarify our position in light of State law. Motion carried
unanimously.
C. Request from Zachman Homes, Inc. to modify setback variances contained .
in Village Woods 2nd Addition
Stephen T. Ryan, representing Zachman Homes, explained the misunderstand-
ing in the setback restrictions contained in the Developer's Agreement
and requested the Agreement be amended to allow a ten foot side yard set
back on the living side of a split level home rather then the current
15 foot requirement.
Planning Director Enger explained the problem was in the definition of
a split level home. The Planning and Building Staffs have considered
them to be 115 story home, whereas Zachman has considered them to be
single story. The Planning Staff has no problem with changing the
Developer's Agreement.
MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Tangen, to amend the Developer's
Agreement to allow a ten foot side yard set back on the living side
of a split level home. Motion carried unanimously.
VIII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 80-27, Park Use Ordinance
Held over to February 17, 1981
B. Resolution No. 81-25, final approval for Municipal Industrial Develop-
ment Bonds in the amount of $970,000.00 for Richard Cohen (Minnesota
Industrial Tool)
. Withdrawn
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Mayor Penzel
a. Subcommittee on Fishing & Restocking Lakes
Bob Gartner, 15701 Cedar Ridge Road, proposed an ad hoc committee
of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission to assess
fishing potential of Eden Prairie Lakes, formulate programs for
Improving fishing in those lakes, and identifying the costs and
benefits of those programs. The Parks, Recreation & Natural Re-
sources Commission supported this proposal at its February 2, 1981
meeting. People interested in serving on this ad hoc committee
include: Bill Garens, Bob Mallet, Jim Simons, Paul Friederichs,
and Marty Jessen as a representative of the Parks, Recreation &
Natural Resources Commission, as well as Bob Gartner.
MOTION: Moved by Redpath, seconded by Tangen, to authorize
the ad hoc committee on fishing and restocking lakes. Motion
carried unanimously.
/11'7
City Council Minutes
-6 - February 3, 1981
b. Appointment to the Sewer Service Area Advisory Board - moved to
the Consent Calendar as III. K.
2. Councilman Bentley
a. Solid Waste Site selection process
Bentley explained he was assigned to deliver this information to
the Eden Prairie and Bloomington City Councils. The selection
process began with the establishment of parameters and criteria
which will be used to select the five sites. The five site
inventory must be submitted to the Metropolitan Council by June
1, 1981, Bentley will keep the Council informed on the progress
of the Committee.
b. Warranty Work by Contractors
Bentley said he has been approached by several individuals who
wondered if the City has any means of responding to contractors
who do not fulfill their warranty commitments,
The City Attorney was requested to submit a written memorandum
in response to this problem.
B. Report of City Attorney
The trial date has been set for March 16, 1981 in the tax increment
financing litigation. City Attorney Pauly requested authorization to
engage consultants and experts as necessary.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to authorize up to $10,000
to engage consultants and experts as necessary for the tax increment
litigation. Bentley, Edstrom, Redpath, Tangen and Penzel voted "aye".
Motion carried unanimously.
C. Report of Acting City Manager
The Development Commission met and decided to solicit aid from the business
community in lobbying efforts in regard to tax increment financing. A break-
fast meeting will be held at City Hall on Wednesday, February 11, at 7:30 a.m.
Redpath noted that the Chamber of Commerce Board had taken action at its
recent meeting to support the City's effort and they should be made aware
of the Wednesday meeting,
D. Report of Planning Director
1. Slope Ordinance
Reference was made to the January 27, 1981 memo from Chris Enger.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Edstrom, to request Staff to
proceed according to the January 27 memo. Motion carried unanimously.
Bentley volunteered to serve on the joint committee (two members
of the Planning Commission, two members from the Parks, Recreation
& Natural Resources Commission, and a member of the City Council)
to study this issue.
1/2
City Council Minutes -7- February 3, 1981
MOTION; Moved by Bentley, seconded by Tangen, to extend the meeting
beyond the 11:30 p.m. time limit. Motion carried unanimously.
2. Eden Prairie Master Plan for City Hall
Planning Director Enger showed seven potential site plans for a
City Hall Complex and discussed the merits and/or drawbacks of each
plan. The consensus was that "Plan G" best meets the needs of the
City at this time.
MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Redpath, to authorize Staff to
proceed with a request for a proposal to hire an architect to do a
needs assessment. Motion carried unanimously.
E. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Hennepin County Park Reserve District Agreement (continued from
1-20-81)
Director of Community Services Lambert review what has happened
in the past two weeks, including a meeting between Staff from the
Hennepin County Park Reserve District (HCPRD), City and the property
owners involved in the Bryant Lake Park area,
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the agreement as written
with the following change to 2.5 on page 11:
"City hereby grants consent to the District to acquire by
negotiation and eminent domain proceedings for the period
of one year from the date of this agreement, the properties
not owned by the City within the approved boundaries of both
parks as shown on exhibit Al and 81, etc."
This would allow the District to negotiate for the acquisition of
all park land that they would have funding for, within that one year
period. At the end of that year, the District or the property owner
would have to request the Council to grant the consent on a parcel
by parcel basis.
John Sunde and Marilyn Egerdal, representing HCPRD, were present
to answer questions.
Jerry Rodberg, 6580 Rowland Road, expressed concern over the timing
of funding. Greg Belinski, attorney for Uherkas of 6517 Rowland Road,
asked that the agreement be amended as per the Staff report. Jerry
Brill, attorney for Metram Properties, stated that Metram desires to
develop their property and will soon come to the City for plan approval.
Bentley asked if the one year power of eminent domain applies also to
properties in the Anderson Lakes Park area. Lambert stated that it is
not necessary as the Park boundaries remain the same as proposed in
1974. All private properties are considered "in holding" and funds
have been set aside to purchase them as they become available.
q29
City Council Minutes
February 3, 1981
Tangen asked if the HCPRD is agreeable to the eminent domain provision
as recommended in the Staff Report dated January 29, 1981. Egerdal
stated that the HCPRD Board's position to date has been to not accept
the Agreement without the unconditional power of eminent domain. Tangen
expressed concern about delaying transition because of deterioration
within the Bryant Lake Park -- the City if doing nothing, the County
nothing,
MOTION; Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Agreement
with the Hennepin County Park Reserve District as originally submitted.
Motion carried unanimously.
2. BMX Track
John Lobben, 14090 Forest Hill Road, spokesman for a group of
people who support development of a BMX Track, spoke to the
proposal.
Lambert, Director of Community Services, stated that the
Staff Report of January 29, 1981, recommends use of a bulldozer
for grading of the track and the access trail.
Redpath raised the question of liability during unsupervised
periods. Lambert responded that it would be the same as on ball
fields and no great problems are forseen.
MOTION: Moved by Tangen, seconded by Redpath, to commit the use
of the City bulldozer for grading of the track and the access trail.
Motion carried unanimously.
3. Purgatory Creek Recreation Area
Don Brauer, Brauer & Associates, representing 12 of 17 property
owners in the Purgatory Creek Area spoke to the proposal,
Director of Community Services Lambert stated that prior to pro-
ceeding with the development of the plan for the Purgatory Creek
Recreation Area, a decision must be made regarding a public 18 hole
golf course. Parks, Recreation, & Natural Resources Commission
approved the concept plan.
MOTION: Moved by Bentley, seconded by Redpath, to direct Staff to
answer, in the next 60 days, the questions posed; and request Don
Brauer to get letters of intent from the property owners. Motion
carried unanimously.
4. Tax forfeited lands (Resolution 81-32) - moved to Consent Calendar III. L
5. National Wildlife Refuge (replaces Resolution No. 81-08 continued from
1/6/81 but inadvertently omitted from the agenda)
The Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission urged the Council
to support the Minnesota River Valley Wildlife Refuge Recreation Area.
430
City Council Minutes -9- February 3, 1981
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to support concept C as
proposed by the refuge plannners and furthermore, to limit and carefully
manage development of snowmobile trails in Eden Prairie, and that eques-
trian trails be included that would connect Eden Prairie trails to the
Minnesota River Valley Trail,and to support the expansion of refuge
boundaries to include the bluff area as proposed by the refuge planners.
The Council also supports the hunting plan that would allow limited
hunting by permit. Motion carried unanimously.
F. Report of City Engineer
1. Receive feasibility report and set hearing date for sewer and
water improvements on Luther Way and Meadow Lane, I.C. 51-395
(Resolution No. 81-26) - moved to Consent Calendar as item III. M.
2. Petition from residents for lowering speed limit on Co. Rd. 4
south of TH 5 _
The Council instructed Staff to informally discuss with the
County the speed limit on County Road 4 to find out what they
consider to be an appropriate speed,
3, Proposal from Northern States Power regarding power line along
Scenic Heights Road
City Engineer Jullie spoke to his Memo of January 29, 1981
regarding the NSP proposal. He pointed out that this is a
policy question.
Sam Higuchi, NSP representative, addressed the NSP proposal.
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Edstrom, to direct Staff,along
with a representative of NSP, to contact "benefited" property owners
to see if they would like to participate in the cost of such an
improvement. Action on this proposal will be deferred until Feb-
ruary 11. Motion carried unanimously.
X. NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Redpath, seconded by Tangen, to adjourn the meeting at
12:27 a.m. Motion carried unanimously.
SPECIAL EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
( iNESDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 1981 , 7:30 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, George Bentley,
Dean Edstrom and George Tangen
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Paul Redpath
COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: Acting City Manager John D. Frane; City
Attorney Rick Rosow, and Joyce Provo,
Recording Secretary
Mayor Penzel called the meeting to order at 7:30 PM.
I. PROPOSAL FROM NORTHERN STATES POWER REGARDING POWER LINE ALONG SCENIC HEIGHTS ROAD
(continued from 2/3/81)
Council reviewed memo from City Engineer Jullie dated February 11, 1981, regarding
the power line along Scenic Heights Road, and requested staff to report back to the
Council on Friday, February 13, as to further contacts with CPT Corporation.
II. City Attorney Rick Rosow discussed with the City Council recent developments in
the Cooley litigation.
III. Councilman Bentley reviewed with the Council the meeting held this morning at City
Hall on Tax Increment Financing, which he and Mayor Penzel attended. An Ad Hoc
committee of concerned persons was appointed and the Council requested that staff
cooperate in supplying information as requested by the committee.
IV. CITY MANAGER SELECTION PROCESS
Resumes 89 and 90 were not received until after the January 16, 1981 deadline,
therefore, they were unacceptable for Council review.
Questions were sent to the 25 applicants still under consideration after the
January 22, 1981 Council meeting. Applicants 35, 36 and 45 did not reply to the
questions submitted to them by the February 6, 1981 deadline, thus were automatically
disqualified. Council members went over the 22 applicants who responded to the
questions, at which time 1, 3, 5, 6, 33, 34, 46, 61, 69, 79 and 81 each received
a "yes", and 21, 22, 23, 29, 30, 39, 44, 53, 62, 72 and 75 each received a "no".
The following dates and times were set up to interview the remaining 11 applicants
with each interview to be no longer than an hour and a half: Friday, February 27,
1981, 6:00 PM - 9:00 PM for applicants 1, 33 and 46; Saturday, February 28, 1981,
9:00 AM - 12:00 Noon (break for lunch) and 1:00 PM - 4:00 PM for applicants 3, 5,
6, 61 and 81, and Wednesday, March 4, 6:00 PM - 9:00 PM for applicants 34, 69 and
79. This is a tentative schedule to be firmed up by Mayor Penzel after he reaches
the 11 applicants this coming weekend. At the time Mayor Penzel contacts each of the
applicants he will ask them to bring a copy of their budget to.the interview.
Additional questions were added to the original list of 7 questions to be asked
during the interview process as follows: 8. What is your outstanding achievement?, .
9. What is your biggest failure?, and 10. Why do you want to come to Eden Prairie?
q3 2.
Special City Council Meeting - 2 - Wed. ,February 11, 1981
IV. CITY MANAGER SELECTION PROCESS (continued)
Airplane reservations and hotel/motel accommodations to be set up through Joyce
Provo at City Hall, and transporting those applicants to and from the Airport/motel/
hotel and City Hall to be coordinated with Public Safety Director Jack Hacking.
Contact to be made to Councilman Paul Redpath on Thursday, February 12, 1981,
to update him on matters discussed and decisions made at this meeting.
V. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Penzel, to adjourn the meeting at 11:00 PM.
Motion carried unanimously.
•
• Toll Free Minnesota (800) 862-6002
Toll Free Other States (800) 328-6122
Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc.
170 Northwestern Financial Center, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 • (612) 631-1500
February 6, 1981
Mr. John Frane
Finance Director
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55343
DELIVERED BY MESSENGER
RE: S & D Properties, Co. Project
Office/Warehouse Building
$350,000 Tax-Exempt Mortgage
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Dear John:
In reference to the above captioned financing transaction, enclosed
is the application and supporting bond counsel documentation re-
questing the City of Eden Prairie to consider approval of a tax-
exempt mortgage to defer a portion of the cost in constructing . a
12,900 square foot office/warehouse building.
A copy of the plans is not, included with the information enclosed.
We will, however, furnish you with a copy within the next ten days.
Also enclosed is a check in the amount of $800 to cover the City's
administrative expenses. We ask that you place the project on the council
, agenda for the February 17 meeting at which time they will motion to
i set the public hearing for the March 17 council meeting.,
A copy of this presentation package was delivered to your city
attorney today.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely
MILLE6;SCHR0EDER'MUNIPPALS, INC.
Pi 7 R mu
A dministrative Assistant
CTR/nf
Enclosures
Headquarters. Minneapolis, Minnesota • Branch Offices; Solana Beach,Caldornia • Northbrook. Illinois • St. Paul, Minnesota • Naptes,Florida
Membet ot the Seethelet Investor Ptotection Chtporattan
Wolfgang H. PenzeI - Mayor
ATTEST: •
John D. Frane - City dIk
( PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
, M •
, 1980.
Single Tree Office
RAP
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Ordinance No. 80-30
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO WINING AND AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 135
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ECES ORDAIN AS FOIIENS:
Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended as follcws: The
follaqing described property, situated inthe County of Hennepin, State of
Minnesota,
As set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
shall be and hereby is removed from the Rural
District and shall be
included hereafter in the Office District.
Section 2. The above-described property shall be subject to all of the
ordinances, rules and regulaticns of the City of Eden Prairie relating to the Office
District.
Section 3. This ordinance shall beans effective fram and after its passage
and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie
an the day of , 1980, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day
of , 1980.
PARCEL I:
Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 369, Files of the Registrar
df Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
PARCEL II:
Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1449, Files of the Registrar
of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except that part of said
Tract C embraced within Registered Land Survey No. 1473.
PARCEL III:
Lot 17, "Auditor's Subdivision No. 3,35, Hennepin County, Minnesota",
according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office
of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, except that
part thereof embraced within Registered Land Survey No. 1473, Files
of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
PARCEL IV.
All that part of Lot 16, "Auditor's Subdivision No. 335, Hennepin
County, Minnesota", lying Northerly of a line which is parallel
with and 34.40 feet South of the South line of Registered Land
Survey No. 369 and its extension East to the Northwesterly line of
U.S. Highway Nos. 169 and 212 and measured along the West line of
said Lot 16 and lying Northwesterly of a line run parallel with and
distant 40 feet northwesterly of Line 1 described below:
Line 1: Beginning at a point on the east and west quarter
line of Section 14, Township 116 North, Range 22
West, distant 2557.59 feet west of the east quarter
corner thereof; thence run northeasterly at an
angle of 45 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds from said
east and west quarter line (measured from east to
north) for 600 feet and there terminating;
according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office
of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, except
that part thereof embraced within Registered Land Survey No. 1473.
184 •
EXHIBIT A
• Single Tree Office
12/80
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered Into as of . , 1980
by and between SINGLE TREE CENTER, a Minnesota General Partner-
ship, hereinafter referred to as "Owner" and the CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to is
"City", .
.WITNESSfTH:
WHEREAS, Owner has applied to City to rezone from Rural to
Office approximately 2 acres, situated in Hennepin County, State
of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto
and made a part hereof and hereafter referred to as "the property".
and
WHEREAS, Owner desires to develop the property to construct
thereon an office building.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance -
No. 80-30, Owner covenants and agree i to construction upon,
development, and maintenance of said property as follows:
1. Owner shall develop the property in con-
formance with the material dated October 14, 1980
reviewed and approved by the City Council on Nov-
ember 18, 1980 and attached hereto as Exhibit B,
subject to such changes and modifications as pro- .
vided herein. Owner shall not develop, construct
upon, or maintain the property in any other respect
or manner than provided herein.
2. Owner covenants and agrees to the performance and
observance by Owner at such times and in such
manner as provided therein of all of the terms,
covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth
in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part
thereof.
Li31
Developer's Agreement-Single Tree Office page 2
3., Owner agrees that Eden Road is in need of
Improvements including: watermain, storm
. sewer, and street and sidewalk, and that
if City constructs such improvements, Owner
consents thereto and the cost thereof may be
assessed against Owner's property in accord-
ance with the City's assessment processes and
policies.
4. Owner shall, concurrent with construction upon
the property, construct a 5 foot wide 5 inch deep
concrete sidewalk with letdown curb and gutter
within the right-of-way and south of the driving
surface of Single Tree Lane as depicted in red
on Exhibit B.
5. No parking area upon the property shall be
closer than 171/2 feet from the southerly right-
of-way of Single Tree Lane.
6. Owner shall, prior to issuance of any permit to
build upon the property, submit to the City and
Watershed District for review and approval a
detailed grading, utility, drainage plan, and
landscaping plans.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have
caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year
aforesaid.
CITY:
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
John D. Frane, Acting City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTAi
SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknoledged before me this
day of 1981 by Wolfgang H. Penzel, the Mayor and
John D. Frane, the Acting City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie,
a municipal corporation on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
LIM
Developer's Agreement-Single Tree Office
page 3
Single Tree Center, a General
Partnership, consisting of
" Willys J. Holmquist, a ..general
partner, and Frank/D. Cardarelle,
a . 1Ttner
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The egoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Ar day
of , 1981 by Willys J. Holmquist, a general partner,
an ran D. Cardarelle, a . partner, on behalf of
Tree Center.
1-1 7.--.0T11? V::::::.?
NOTAIIV .. ";LOC-MIt.41•2:SCTA
• ml• cClu•• MC*. :Xi, :'..n 0.••,-; C. •,•;:•,. :
4
PARCEL I:
Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 369, Files of the Registrar
of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
•
PARCEL II:
Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1449, Files of the Registrar
• of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except that part of said
Tract C embraced within Registered Land Survey No. 1473.
PARCEL III:
Lot 17, "Auditor's Subdivision No. 335; Hennepin County, Minnesota",
according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office
of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, except that
part thereof embraced within Registered Land Survey No. 1473, Files
of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
PARCEL IV.
All that part of Lot 16, "Auditor's Subdivision No. 335, Hennepin
County, Minnesota", lying Northerly of a line which is parallel
with and 34.40 feet South of the South line of Registered Land
Survey No. 369 and its extension East to the Northwesterly line of
U.S. Highway Nos. 169 and 212 and measured along the West line of
said Lot 16 and lying Northwesterly of a line run parallel with and
distant 40 feet northwesterly of Line 1 described below:
Line 1: Beginning at a point on the east and west quarter -
line of Section 14, Township 116 North, Range 22
West, distant 2557.59 feet west of the east quarter -
corner thereof; thence run northeasterly at an
angle of 45 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds from said
east and west quarter line (measured from east to
north) for 600 feet and there terminating;
according to the plat thereof on file -or of record in the office
of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, except
that part thereof embraced within Registered Land Survey No. 1473.
EXHIBIT A qq0
•
0.
Nt,
EXHIBIT B
4Lit Oct. 14, 1980
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
EXHIBITC
page 1 of 5
I. Prior to release of final plat, Owner shall submit to the City •
Engineer for approval two copies of a development plan (1"=100' scale)
showing existing and proposed contours, proposed streets and lot
arrangements and size, minimum floor elevations on each lot, preliminary
,alignment and grades for sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer,
100 year flood plain contours, ponding areas, tributary areas to catch
basins, arrows showing direction of storm water flow on all lots,
location of walks, trails and any property to be deeded to the City.
II.. Owner shall submit detailed construction and storm sewer
' plans to the Riley-Purgatory Creek
Watershed District for review and approval.
Owner shall follow all rules and recommendations of said
Watershed District.
Owner shall pay cash park fees as to all of the property required'
by any ordinance in effect as of the date of the issuance of each
building permit for construction on the property.. Presently,
the amount of cash park fee applicable to the property is
$1,400 per acre. The amount to be paid by Owner shall be increased
or decreased to the extent that City ordinances are amended or.
supplemented to require a greater or lesser amount as of the date
of the issuance of any building permit for construction on the _
property.
V. Prior to the dedication, transfer or conveyance of any real
property or interest therein to the City as provided herein,
Owner shall deliver to the City an opinion addressed to the
City by an Attorney, and in a form , acceptable to City, as to
the condition of the title of such property or in lieu of a
title opinion, a title insurance policy insuring the condition •
of the property or interest therein in the City. The condition of
the title of any real property or any interest therein to be
dedicated, transferred or conveyed as may be provided herein by
Owner to City shall vest in City good and marketable title,
therein free and clear of any mortgages, liens, encumbrances,
or assessments.
Paoe 2 of 5Exhibit C
V. A. All sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer facilities, concrete
curb, gutters, sidewalks and other public utilities ("improvements")
to be made and constructed on or within the propeky and dedicated
. to the City shall be designed in compliance with City standards by
a registered professional engineer and submitted to the City Engin-
'eer for approval. All of the improvements shall be completed by
Owner & acceptable to the City Engineer and shall be free and clear
of any lien, claim, charge or encumbrance, including any for Work,
—
labor or services rendered in connection therewith or material or
equipment supplied therefore on or before the later of, 2 years
from the date hereof or , 19 . Upon com-
pletion and acceptance, Owner warrants and guarantees the improve-
ments against any defect in materials or workmanship for a period
of two (2) years following said completion and acceptance. In
the event of any defect in materials or workmanship within said
2 year period warranty and guarantee shall be for a period of three
(3) years following said completion and acceptance. Defects in
material or workmanship shall be determined by the City Engineer.
Acceptance of improvements by the City Engineer may be subject to
such conditions as he may impose at the time of acceptance. Owner,
through his engineer, shall provide for competent daily inspection
during the construction of all improvements. As-built drawings
• with service and valve ties on reproduceable mylar shall be deliver-
ed to the City Engineer within 60 days of completion thereof to-
gether with a written statement from a registered engineer that all
improvements have been completed, inspected and tested in accordance
with City-approved plans and specifications. Prior to final plat
approval, or issuance of any building permit, if no final plat is
required, Owner shall:
Submit a bond or letter of credit which guarantees com-
pletion of-all improvements within the times provided,
upon the conditions, and in accordance with the terms
of this subparagraph V. A., including but not limited
• to, a guarantee against defects in materials or work-
manship for a period of two (2) years following com-
pletion and acceptance -of the improvements by the City
Engineer. The amount of the bond or letter of credit
shall be 125% of the estimated construction cost of
said improvements, sub;ect to reduction thereof to an
amount equal to 25Z of the cost of the improvements
after acceptance thereof by the City Engineer, and re-
ceipt of as-built drawings. The bond or letter of
credit shall be in such form and contain such other
provisions and terms as may be required by the City
Engineer. The Owner's registered engineer shall make
and submit for approval to the City Engineer a written
estimate of the costs of the improvements.
B, In lieu of the obligation imposed by subparagraph V.A, above, Owner
may submit a 100% petition signed by all owners of the property, re-
questing the City to install the improvements. Upon approval by the
City Council, the City may cause said improvements to he made and
special assessments for all costs for said improvements will be
levied on the property, except any property which is or shall be ded-
q113
page 3 of g Exhibit C
icated to the public, over a five year period. Prior to the award
of any contract by the City for the construction of any improve-
ments, Owner shall have entered into a contract for rough grading
- of streets included in the improvements to a finished subgrade
elevation. Contractor's obligation with respect to the rough grad-
ing work shall be secured by a bond or letter of credit which shall
guarantee completion, and payment for all labor and materials ex-
pended in connection with the rough grading. The amount of the
bond or letter of credit shall be 125% of the cost of such rough
• grading and shall be in such form and contain such further 'terms
as may be required by the City'Engineer.
• C. Prior to release of final plat, Owner shall pay to City fees for
first two year street lighting (public streets) engineering re-
view and street signs. .
-
VI. A. Owner shall remove all soil, and debris from, and clean, all streets
within, the property at least every two months, (or within one week
from the date of any request by City), during the period commencing ,
May 1 and ending October 31, of each year, until such time as such
streets and improvements therein are accepted for ownership and 1
maintenance by City.
Within 20 days of installation of utilities and street curb in any
portion of the property (if said time occurs between May 1 and
October 31 of any year) Owner shall sod (secured with a minimum of .
2 stakes per roll of sod) that part of the property lying between
said curb and a line 18 inches measured perpendicular with the curb
or in lieu of said sod, place a fiber blanket with seed approved by
the City (secured with stakes a maximum of 6 feet apart). Either
Sod or fiber must be placed upon a minimum of 4 inches of topsoil.
The topsoil shall be level with the top of the curb at the curb
line and rise 1/2" for each foot from the curb line.
Owner shall maintain the sod, fiber blanket, topsoil, and grade until
such time as the streets and improvements in the property are accept-
ed for ownership and maintenance by City.
Owner shall also sod all drainage swales serving each 1.5 acres a -
minimum distance of 6.feet on either side of the center of the swale.
C. The bond of letter of credit provided in paragraph V A. hereof shall
also guarantee the performance of Owner's obligations under this
paragraph VI.
VII. Owner shall file this Agreement with the Register of Deeds or Register of
Titles and supply the City with a copy of this Agreement with information
as to Document Pember and date and time of filing duly certified thereon
with 60 days from the date of this Agreement.
VIII. If Owner fails to proceed in accordance with this Agreement within 24
months of the date hereof and provide proof of filing in accordance
with item VII. hereof, Owner for itself, its successors, and assigns
shall not oppose rezoning of said property to Rural.
• , 8/21/BO
Page 4 of 5 Exhibit C •
•
IX. Provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against
Owner, its successors, and assigns of the property herein described.
X. .Owner represents and warrants it owns fee title to the property free
and clear of mortgages, liens and other encumbrances. except:
• . .
XI : In the event there are qr wilibe constructed on the property, 2 or. more
streets, and if permanent street signs have not been installed, Owner
shall install temporary street signs in accordance with recommendations
of the City Building Department, prior to the issuance Of any permit to
build upon the property.
•
XII. All improvements including • grading, seeding, planting, landscaping,
equiping, and constructing of any structure to or upon any of the
property or other lands to be conveyed or dedicated to the City or for
which an easement is to be given to the City , for park or other recre-
ational purposes, shall be completed by Owner & acceptable to the
Director of Community Services and shall be free and clear' of any lien,
claim, change, or encumbrance, including any for work, labor, or ser-
vices rendered in connection therewith or material or equipment sup-
plied therefore on or before the later of, 2 years from the date hereof
or , 19. _, Upon comments against any defect in materials
or workmanship fO'r a period of two (2) years following said completion
and acceptance. In the event of any defect in materials or workmanship
within said 2 year period the warranty and guarantee shall be for a period
of three (3) years following said completion and acceptance. Defects
in materials or workmanships shall be determined by the Director of
Community Services. Acceptance of improvements by the Director of.
Community Services may be subject to such conditions as he may impose
at the time of acceptance.. Owner, through his engineer, shall-provide
for competent daily inspection during the.construction of all improve-
ments. Prior to final plat approval, or issuance of any building permit,
if no final plat is required, Owner shall:
Submit a bond or letter of credit which guarantees com-
pletion of all improvements within the times provided,
.upon the conditions, and in accordance with the terms
of this subparagraph V. A., including but not limited
to, a guarantee against defects in materials or work:
manship for a period of two (2) years following com-
pletion and the extension of the period to three (3)
ears in the event of any defect during said 2 year
period, and acceptance of the improvements bY.the Dir-
ector of Community Services shall be 125% of the estim-
ated construction cost of said improvements, subject to
reduction thereof to an amount equal to 25% of the cost
of the improvements after acceptance thereof by the Dir-
ector of Comnunity Services. The bond or letter of credit
shall be in such form and contain such other provisions
and terms 4s may be required by the Director of Community
Services. The Owner's registered engineer shall make
and submit for approval to the Director of Community Scr-
Vices a written estimate of the costs of the improvements.
itqc
1/80
.8/30/80
Page 5 of 5 Exhibit C •
XIII. Owner acknowledges that the rights of City to -rformance of obligations
of owner contemplated in this agreement are spE.Aal, unique and of an
-extraordinary character; and that in the event that owner violates or
fails or refuses to perform any covenant, condition or provision made by .
him herein, City may be without an adequate remedy at law. Owner agrees,
thexefore,.that in the event he violates, fails or refuses to perform any
covenant, condition or provisionmade herein, City may, at its 'option,
institute and prosecute an action to specifically enforce performance of
such covenant. No remedy conferred in this agreement is intended to be
exclusive and each shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every
other remedy. The election of any one or more remedies shall not constitute
a waiver of any other remedy. .
XIV. Any term of .this agreement that is illegal or unenforceable at law or in
equity shall be deemed to be void and of no force and effect to the extent
necessary to bring such term within the provisions of any such applicable
law or laws, and such terms as so modified and the balance of the terms
of this agreement shall be fully enforceable.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
John D. Franc, Acting City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services(...-
February 10, 1981
Policy on Park Facility Reservations
On February 2, 1981, the Parks Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
reviewed the January 27, 1981 memo from staff on policies for park facility
reservations.
The Commission recommended approval of the policies as proposed by the
January 27 mcmo with the following addition under Building Reservations:
City Staff develop a graduated scale damage deposit fee based
on the numbers of people in the groups. Damage deposit should
range from $25 to a maximum of $200.
City staff requests the City Council to approve these policies as recommended
by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission.
BL:md
qql
2/4/81
CHECK LIST FOR PARK FACILITY RESERVATIONS POLICIES
1. BALLFIELDS
a. Reservations for tournaments by public Eden Prairie Service
groups or City sponsored programs only. No Charge.
b. Reservations for team practice by Eden Prairie League teams
prior to season opening.
2. PICNIC AREAS
First come first serve basis only - no reservations
3. BUILDINGS
a. Round Lake Picnic Pavilion - minimum number required 25 people/group
maximum number for this shelter 150/group
b. Round Lake Park Shelter -
minimum required 50 people/group
maximum for this shelter 350/group
(If reservations exceed 350, the group must also reserve the
picnic pavilion.)
c. 500 is the maximum these facilities can adequately handle i.e.
parking, restrooms, picnic tables, etc. Any groups larger than
500 must discuss reservations with the Director of Community
Services to plan for group rental of satellites, arrangements
for parking control, etc.
d. Reservation Deposit: $25 for groups of 25-50
$50 for groups of 50 -100
$75 for groups of 100-200
$100 for groups of 200-400
$200 for groups over 400
e. Individuals and companies located in Eden Prairie may reserve
buildings anytime after January 1 for reservations during that
year. There is no charge for reservations but there is a deposit
that will be retained if there is any damage to the facilites or
if the buildings and surrounding grounds are not cleaned of all
litter generated by the group.
f. Companies outside of Eden Prairie but with branch offices in Eden
Prairie or with Eden Prairie residents as employees may reserve •
facilities at no charge after June 1 of the current year.
g. Companies outside of Eden Prairie with no branch office in Eden
Prairie or no Eden Prairie residents will not be allowed to reserve
facilities.
0
-MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
January 27, 1981
Policy on Park Facility Reservations
At the January 5 meeting, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
Commission reviewed the December 9, 1980 memorandum from staff regarding
existing policies on reservations of City park facilities. The Commission
requested staff to clarify the request and the alternatives.
BALLFIELD RESERVATIONS
The existing City policy allows reservations for tournaments on Eden
. Prairie fields only by public service groups or City sponsored programs.
The question is should the City expand reservation use of City ballfields
to include teams participating in the Eden Prairie softball leagues. This
would expand the use of the fields, but would also in turn create some other
problems including:
a. Possible conflicts in use of facilities when buildings are
reserved by other groups.
b. Increased maintenance on fields.
c. The City could expect other problems that go with large crowds
and alcohol.
Staff recommends no change to the existing policy at this time.
BUILDINGS
The old log building at Round Lake Park was reserved free of charge for Eden
Prairie residents and companies, but residents or companies from outside
the community were charged $100 per day. The use of this facility included
the use of one ballfield.
That building has been taken down. However, there is a new park shelter that
will be constructed at Round Lake Park and there is an existing open sided
shelter adjacent to the tennis courts at Round Lake Park. There will also
be a park shelter constructed at Staring Lake Park in the near future.
f)
-2-
City staff recommends that the existing policy be changed to allow groups
with a minimum number of 50 people to reserve the new park shelter at
Round Lake Park and groups with a minimum of 25 people to be able to
reserve the pavilion (adjacent to the tennis courts at Round Lake Park) and
the proposed new picnic shelter at Staring Lake Park. These facilities
should be reserved with a deposit of $50 for the new park shelter and
$25 for each of the other facilities to be refunded provided the park
shelter and surrounding area are picked up of litter generated by the
reservation group. It should not be refunded if the City is required to
do any cleanup of the shelter or surrounding area.
Staff also recommends that there be no fee charged for the use of these
facilities and that reservations be limited to Eden Prairie residents
and Eden Prairie companies.
-
Staff recommends the Commission consider allowing companies outside of
Eden Prairie, but with Eden Prairie residentsas employees, to be able
to reserve these facilities after June 1 of each year at no charge.
PICNIC AREAS
The City had a policy allowing group reservation use in Bryant Lake Park.
. Although, the City is developing picnic areas in Round Lake Park and Staring
Lake Park, these areas will not be fully developed for about two years.
STaff would recommend not designating any of these areas for reservation
use at this time.
".n
Feb. 17, 1981
. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
' HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R81-42
, A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
OF JENARD ADDITION REPEAT
WHEREAS, the plat of Menard Addition Replat has been sub-
mitted in the manner required for platting land wider the Eden Prairie Ordinanc
e
Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have be
e
n
duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and
the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordin
-
ances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A.- Plat Approval Request for_Meriard Addition Replat is approved
upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's :
- Report on this plat dated February 4, 1981.
That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of
this resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Regis-
trar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3.
That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy
of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named
plat.
That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute
the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon com-
pliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on
WolfTarN..Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
ci
C.
.*
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
'TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
Roger Ulstad, City Manager
Carl Jullie, City Engineer
February 11, 1981
MENARD ADDITION REPLAT
PROPOSAL: The developer, Menard, Inc., is requesting Ci
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
of the final plat of Menard Addition Replat. This is a
r
e
p
l
a
t
o
f
Outlots D, E and F, Menard Addition. The necessity of re
a
l
i
g
n
i
n
g
Plaza Drive to an area of more suitable soils and improv
i
n
g
i
t
s
intersection point with Schooner Boulevard are the consi
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
for this request.
HISTORY: The final plat of Menard Addition was approved b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
-
cil on February 20, 1979, per Resolution 79-41.
The preliminary plat for Menard Addition Replat was approv
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
Council on December 2, 1980, per Resolution R80-234, subje
c
t
t
o
t
h
e
Planning Commission recommendations of November 24, 1980.
The Developer's Agreement, executed on December 5, 1978, a
n
d
A
d
d
e
n
d
u
m
One, executed on October 22, 1980, for Menard Addition wil
l
a
p
p
l
y
to this plat.
VARIANCES: All varinace requests must be processed by th
e
B
o
a
r
d
o
f
Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: The requirements for the install
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
m
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
utilities and streets are covered in the Developer's Agre
e
m
e
n
t
.
Some utility easements and a portion of Plaza Drive as pl
a
t
t
e
d
i
n
Menard Addition and proposed to be vacated in connection
w
i
t
h
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
of this final plat.
PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication a
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
- Developer's Agreement.
BONDING: The requirements for bonding to cover the cost
o
f
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
i
n
g
municipal utilities and streets are covered in the Develo
p
e
r
'
s
A
g
r
e
e
-
ment.
The Planning Commission on November 24, 1980, required a
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
bond in the maount of 150% of the estimated cost of land
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
grading. The total amount of this bond must be approved
b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Planner and supplied prior to release of the final plat.
q 6- 2.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Menard Addition
Replat subject to the requirements of this report .,, the Developer's
Agreement and the following: --
1. Receipt of fee for City Engineering services in
the amount of $500.--
2. Satisfaction of Bonding Requirement.
3. Approval of Resolution R81-20, vacating a portion
of Plaza Drive and utility easements.
CJJih
q53
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
FROM: Stuart A. Fox, City Forestergte
February 13, 1981
SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Removal of Diseased Trees on Private
Property
In a effort to get property owners to remove diseased trees the staff
has made several attempts to work with the affected property owners.
To date the procedures have been as follows:
1. Original notification - summer of 1980 (giving owner 20
days to have trees removed).
2. Second notification - November 1980.
3. Date set foreublic Hearing - January 5, 1981 Council meeting.
4. Public notification of property owners - two publications in
Eden Prairie News February 1981.
5. Third letter to property owners February 6, 1981, informing
them of February 17, 1981 Public Hearing. .
6. February 17, 1981 Council meeting - Public Hearing with
estimated costs. Property owners have opportunity to appeal.
Many property owners have responded to this effort by the staff to have
diseased trees removed, however many property owners have not. Enclosed
is a list of property owners who have not removed diseased trees as
required by City Ordinance #77-36.
The staff recommends the Council require abatement of the trees on this
list by Resolution #81-37.
SAF.md
115 T
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 81-37
RESOLUTION ORDERING A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FOR THE REMOVAL OF DISEASED ELM TREES
WHEREAS, the City Council fixed the 17th day of February 1981 for a
Public Hearing on the proposed improvement to remove diseased elm trees from
private lands and,
WHEREAS, all property owners whose property is liable to be assessed
for the making of this improvement have been notified and notice has been
published as required by law;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered.
2. The City Forester is authorized to advertise for bids
for the removal of said trees. (See attached list of
properties)
ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 17th
day of February 1981.
Wolfgang II. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST;
John D. Franc, Clerk SEAL
ADDRESS NA ME LOCATION OF TREES it TREES DATE :MARKED ESTIMATED- COST CMSENTS dco Properties 7400 Metro Blvd. Edina, Minn. 55435 ' 25-116-22-24-0020 Olyfipic Hills 3rd Addn. Lot 3, Block 4 . . 1 .. ' ' 6/16/80 : $85 Tree #55 obert Beatty 15040 Iroriwood Court I 4-116-22-43-0039 . . . ' Linden Pond 3rd Addn Lot 2 Block 1 , ' " 2 . ; • 7/9/80 . - $170 #450,451 ' aul Belvedere 585 So. Medical Bldg. 6545 France Ave. South Edina, nidnesota • 14-116-22-34-0003 . RLS 168 Tract B 8480 Frani° Road • '. • : —4 ' ' 6/24/80 • . $340 .• #257,258,259 260 1•, lay-Morr Builders , 812 9th Ave. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 4-116-22-43-0085 Woodland Addition , I Lot 11 Block 2 :' I : 2 7/7/80 $179 . .. " .. #382,383 • . . lay-Morr Builders ., . 4-416-22-43-0084 Woodland Addition : • Lot 10 Block 2 1 7/7/80: • $85 — , , , $4,335 .. ,•• $384 ' f#430433 • 444-445 - 448-492 . Carmody - 8595 Mitchell Road • 15-116-22-34-0001 “ 15-116-22-43-0001 ... ' • ; Legal # 10 and 11 , ' 51 7/22/80 hicago, Mil. St aul & Pacific ailroad Roadmaster 221 3rd Ave. South Minneapolis, Minn. Railroad ROW , ., Section 3 and 4 Legal # . 1 and 2 15 1 7/28/80 , 11,275 , #795-809 . . /I . /I . Railroad ROW . . Section 3 . . Legal #1 3 • .: 8/18/80 : $2,i5 . #1519-1521 . !avid Denton • 16860 No. Manor Road . . 5i-116-22-24-0020 Cbachlight Manor 1 ,. ,. 6/25/80, $125 . ;. #219 Lbt 2 Block 2
. NAME ADDRESS LOCATION OF TREES # TREES DATE MARKED ESTIMATED cosT CONZENTS lfering Const. 7220 Washington Ave. So. . Eden Prairie, Minn. 4-116-22-43-0102Woodland Addn Lot 28 Block 2 1 7/3/80 $85 #368 . u 4-116-22-43-0105 . Woodland Addn Lot 31 Block 2 1 $85 8/21/80 #1613 . Holmes Empson 7132 Valley View Road Eden Prairie, Minn. 4-116-22-44-0007 Woodland Addn Lot 8 Block 2 4 7/7/80 $340 #387-390 dina Building Inc'. 7400 Metro Blvd. Edina, Minn. 55435 6-116-22-34-0002 Legal 3 6-116-22-31-0002 Legal 4 26 ,8/11/80 $2,210 #1319-1339 #1374-1377 ' aulk & Reynolds Box 428 Antigo, Wisc. 54409 23-116-22-42-0001 . RLS 1041 Tract A 59 7/13/80 $5,015 ' #603-649 660-667 & 1717 1808. 1809, 1851 1870 ield & Anderson ' • 3434 Heritage Drive Edina, Minn. 55435 1-116-22-11-0013 10 Crosstown Industrial Park' Lot 3 Block 1 8/14/80 S850 614-623 onald Flake 9500 Flying Cloud Drive 27-116-22-11-0029 Legal # 12 9 7/24/80 $765 #588,618-625 hocas Goebel 316 Broadway Jordan. Minn. 8-116-22-33-0015 ' Heritage Park 1st Addn ' 6 Lot 2 Block2 7/15/80 $510 0539-543 ;olfview Invest- :ent Co. 114 Sandy Hook Road ' Excelsior, Minn. 10-116-22-23-0019 Golf Vista Addn 3 Lot 10 Block 1 8/25/80 $255 #633-635 - —
_ NAME ADDRESS LOCATION OF TREES # TREES DATE MARKED ESTIMATEC. COST ' • COMMIS Geoffrey Gothro 9320 Garrison Way . 24-116-22-21-0024 Basswood Forest Int A 111nrk 1 1 . 6/25& $85 #335 Hustad . 12750 Pioneer Trail 25-116-22-41-0065 Prairie East 3rd Addn Outlot A 22 6/16/80, //11/8c $1,870 #67-72 .769-786 Hustad u 25-116-22-11-0154 Prairie East 7th Addn Lot 54 Block 1 4 6/18/80 •7/11/80 $340 #116 788-790 Hustad u . 25-116-22-44-0007 Legal # 7 2 7/1/80 , $170 #525-526 . Hustad n 26-116-22-22-0065 Legal # 9 4 6/13/80, $340 . #17-20 • . Hustad .. 20-116-22-14-0003 Legal #'6 55 7/23/80. $4.675 #514-568 . H ustad .1 25-116-22-12-0023 ,Prairie East Lot 26 Block 1 1 8/25/80 $85 • #1101 Hustad 0 ' 26-116-22-22-0051 Creekwood Estates 2nd Lot 3 Block 1 2 8/25/80 $170 #1088-1089 _
NAM ADDRESS LOCATION OF TREES it TREES DATE MARKED ESTIMATE COST f conmas obert Iverson 5336 64th St. West . Edina, Minn. 55435 - 24-116-22-34-0038 Olympic Hills 2nd Addn. Lot 6 Block 3 5 . 6/18/80 $425 #131-135 . Larson 16165 Hillcrest Lane . 8-116-22-11-0044 , Hillcrest Court 3rd Addn Int R Rlnrk 1 2 8/26/80. $280 #1642-1643 ussell Marsh 6509 Baker Road 3-116-22-41-0002 Legal # 13 19 7/3/80 $1,615 #256-275 on McGlynn . 9320 Overlook Trail • 24-116-22-34-0032 Olympic Hills 2nd Addn Lot 10 Block 3 3 .6/18/80. $225 #139-141 on McGlynn 4-plex dev.) P.O. Box 35406 Normandale Station Edina. Minnesota 55435 . 24-116-22-32-0010 Highpoint 4th Addn Lot 9 Block I 2 6/19/80 $170 #151-152 . 11 , 31 24-116-22-32-0006 Hiohpoint 4th Addn Lot 5 Block 1 . 1 6/19/80 $85 _ $255 3 '6/17/80 #150 • Keith Waters 9481 Creekwood Drive . 25-116-22-13-0004 Prairie East Lot 3 Block 1 #100-102 John Wolcott 9508 Garrison Way . 24-116-22-21-0023 Basswood Forest Lot 7 Block 3 2 6/25/80 $170 #336-338 . . - ,
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF HEARING ON
PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
Notice is hereby given that the City Council will meet Thuesday, February
17, 1981 at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at the City Hall located at 8950 Eden Prairie
Road for the purpose of holding a public hearing to consider the proposed
assessments for the removal of Dutch elm diseased tress.
The properties to be assessed are described as follows: Township 116, Range 22.
Section 1
Crosstown Industrial Park Lot 3 Block 1
Section 4
Linden Pond 3rd Addition
Woodland Addition
Woodland Addition
Woodland Addition
Woodland Addition
Woodland Addition
Section 5
Coachlight Manor
Section 8
Heritage Park 1st Addition
Hillcrest Court 3rd Addition
Section 10
Golf Vista Addition
Section 14
RLS 168, Tract B
Section 23
RLS 1041, Tract A
Section 24
Basswood Forest
Basswood Forest
Olympic Hills 2nd Addition
Olympic Hills 2nd Addition
Highpoint 4th Addition
Highpoint 4th Addition
Lot 3 Block 1
Lot 8 Block 2
Lot 10 Block 2
Lot 11 Block 2
Lot 28 Block 2
Lot 31 Block 2
Lot 2 Block 2
Lot 2 Block 2
Lot 5 Block 3
Lot 10 Block 1
Lot 8 Block 3
Lot 7 Block 3
Lot 6 Block 3
Lot 10 Block 3
Lot 5 Block I
Lot 9 Block 1
Section 25
Olympic Hills 3rd Addition Lot 3 Block 4
Prairie East Lot 3 Block I
Prairie East Lot 26 Block 1
Prairie East 3rd Outlot A
Prairie East 7th Lot 54 Block I
Amsden Hills 11V) Lot 22 Block 5
Section 26 •
tieekwbod Estates 2nd :Lot 3 Block 1
:
Stuart A. Fox
7:-• Deputy Clerk
4aoh1i'sb:: Eden Prairie News February 4, 1981
-7
:
*
•
461
Section 3 Legal #1
Railroad right-of-way lying in the NW 1/2 of the NW 4 of the NW 4 of Section 3,
Township 116, Range 22.
Section 4 Legal N2
Railroad right-of-way lying diagonally from the NE 4 of the NE ¼ of Section 4
to the SW 4 of the SW 4 of Section 4, Township 116, Range22.
Section 6 Legal N3
6-116-22-31-0002
Commencing at the NE corner of the NE 4 of the SW 4 of Section 6, Township 115,
Range 22; thence west along the N line thereof to a point a distance of 110 feet
E from the NE corner of Lochanburn; thence S200 feet; thence W 110 feet to the
E line of Lochanburn; thence S along said E line to the S line of the NE 4 of the
SW 4; thence E to the SE corner thereof; thence N to beginning.
6-115-22-34-0002 Legal N4
Commencing at the most westerly corner of Bellhurst Addition in Section 6, Township
116, Range 22; thence N 35 degrees 57 minutes W along the center line of Town Road
a distance of 150 feet; thence N 52 degrees 33 minutes E a distance of 240 feet;
thence N 35 degrees 57 minutes W a distance of 130 feet; thence S 52 degrees 33
minutes W a distance of 240 feet to the center line of Town Road; thence north-
westerly along center line of said road to its intersection with a line running from
a point in the N line of the S ½ of the SW 4 a distance of 1273 6/10 feet E from
the NW corner thereof to a point in the S line thereof a distance of 1273 59/100
feet E from the SW corner thereof; thence N along said line to the N line of the
S 4 of the SW 4; thence E to the NE corner thereof; thence S along E line thereof
to the N line of Bellhurst Addition; thence westerly southerly and westerly along
the northerly and westerly line of said Addition to the point of beginning, except
road.
Section 20 Legal 115
20-116-22-14-0003
The southerly 3/8 of the NE 4 of the NE 4 of Section 20, Township 116, Range 22.
Section 25 Legal #7
25-115-22-44-0007
--Commencing at the NE corner of SE 4 of the SE 4 of Section 25, Township 116, Range
22; thence W to NW corner thereof; thence S to a point 205 81/100 feet N of
northerly line of County Road 1; thence E 509 62/100 feet; thence S 4 degrees 45
minutes W to said road line; thence easterly on road line 65 36/100 feet; thence
N 4 degrees 45 minutes E 311 5/10 feet; thence E 161 53/100 feet; thence S
4 degrees 45 minutes W 302 55/100 feet; thence S 53 degrees 27 minutues W 302 feet;
thence S 53 degrees 27 minutues W to the northerly line of said road; thence
southerly along said road line to E line of'Section; thence M to beginning, except road.
ql,3
Section 26 Legal #9
26-116-22-22-0065
That part of the W 14 of the NW 14 of Section 26, Township 116, Range 22 lying
northerly of County Road 1 westerly of Creek Knoll Road and southerly of Yorkshire
Point, also that part of the E 5 chains of the NE 14 of Section 27, Township 116,
Range 22 lying northerly of County Raod 1 and southerly and easterly of Yorkshire
Point.
Publish: Eden Prairie News: February 4, 1981
Section 3 Legal 013
NE h of SE 14 of Section 3, Township 116, Range 22,
Section 15
15-116-22-34-0001 Legal #10
S 1/2 of the SE 14 of the SW 14 of Section 15, Township 116, Range 22
15-116-22-43-0001 Legal #11
SW 14 of the SE 14 of Section 15, Township 116, Range 22.
Section 27 Legal #12
27-116-22-11-0029
That part of the W 660 feet of the E 990 feet of the NE 14 of the NE 14 of Section
27, Township 116, Range 22 lying S of Purgatory Creek and lying N of Flying Cloud
Drive.
Minutes-Parks, Recreation &
Natural Resources Commission
approved
January 19, 1981
MEMBERS ABSENT: Johnson
1. Development Proposal -MTSACC POD
John Worrel of Brauer and Associates presented the proposal. He
located the 160 acre MTSbiCC Industrial Campus to be south of TH 5,
east of Mitchell Road, and west of Purgatory Creek. The property
is primarily industrial inoluding supportive commercial facilities
(two restaurants).
Worrel outlined the trail system which will be planned to work into
the City trail system.
The developer is proposing to fill 1.8 acres of the present 17.9
aores of floodplain (10;i encroachment). The Watershed District
has indicated this is in accord with their standards.
Xingrey asked how many yards of peat would have to be removed in
order to extend W. 78th St. across Purgatory Creek. Worrel could
not give a definite answer and mentioned that it is still question-
able whether. 78th St. should be extended.
VanMeter asked where the 1.8 acres of fill would come from. Worrel
answered from the eastern portion of the site near the Creek.
Jessen asked if the floodplain would be dedicated. Lambert responded
that at this point he assumes the floodplain is an outlot and the
City will be relying on cash park fees. '
VanMeter asked what the amount of impervious surface is. Worrel
estimated 45-1,,.
MOTION: VanEeter recommended approval of the concept plan of the MTH/
MCC Industrial Campus. Jessen seconded the motion.
AMENDMENT: Jessen moved to amend the motion to ensure a trail
casement is provided north of W. 78th St. to TM 5. Friederichs
seoonded the amendment and it was approved.
VOTE: Anderson called for the vote and the motion carried unanimously.
(RA
approved
Planning Commission Minutes
January 12, 1981
MEMBERS ABSENT: Bearman & Retterath
C. MTS/MCC INDUSTRIAL CAMPUS, by MIS Systems Corporation and
Magnetic Controls Company. Request for PUD Conc
e
p
t
approval of industrial and commercial uses upon
1
5
0
acres. Located off of the Southeast corner of M
i
t
c
h
e
l
l
Road and TH 5. A continued public hearing.
The Planner stated that this is a continued publi
c
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
8
,
1
9
8
0
.
He also stated that Mr. John Worrall, Brauer & As
s
o
c
.
,
L
t
d
.
I
n
c
.
,
w
a
s
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
t
o
give a brief presentation.
Worrall reviewed the proposal and stated that the
y
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
s
t
u
d
y
i
n
g
t
h
e
a
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
s
or disadvantages of rightin - rightout access to
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
5
.
H
e
a
l
s
o
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
t
h
e
MTS/MCC's compliance with the Staff's recommendati
o
n
s
o
f
1
/
9
/
8
1
.
The Planner reviewed the findings and conclusions of th
e
s
t
a
f
f
r
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
1
/
9
/
8
1
.
Gartner asked if there was a phasing plan for cons
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
F
r
a
n
k
K
i
e
s
n
e
r
,
M
C
C
,
stated that they are holding the land for future d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
s
t
a
t
e
d
that they could begin construction by 1983 but are
n
o
t
c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
d
t
o
.
Torjesen asked if West 78th Street crosses over an
i
n
t
e
r
c
e
p
t
o
r
s
e
w
e
r
l
i
n
e
.
T
h
e
Planner replied yes and that a feasibility study would have to be done t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
if there were soil related problems.
Gartner asked when the addition to MIS would be
g
i
n
.
P
a
u
l
S
t
r
a
n
d
,
M
T
S
,
r
e
p
l
i
e
d
n
o
t
before 1984.
Levitt asked if the current access onto Highway
5
f
r
o
m
M
I
S
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
c
l
o
s
e
d
.
P
a
u
l
Strand replied that they were not sure, but were
t
r
y
i
n
g
t
o
m
a
k
e
p
l
a
n
s
f
o
r
b
e
t
t
e
r
a
c
c
e
s
s
with this plan, because the current access to TH
5
i
s
n
o
t
t
h
a
t
d
e
s
i
r
e
a
b
l
e
.
Levitt stated that there should not be more inte
n
s
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
t
h
a
n
1
-
5
w
h
e
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
returns for rezoning. . .
Levitt asked if anyone in the audience had any qu
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
/
o
r
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
.
N
o
n
e
w
e
r
e
r
a
i
s
e
d
.
MOTION 1
-CaT'iner -moved to close the public hearing on the US/MCC PUD. Sutliff secon
d
e
d
,
motion carried 5-0.
MOTION 2
tartner moved to recommend to the City Council ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
t
h
e
M
T
S
/
M
C
C
P
O
D
a
s
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
and revised 1/8/81 as per the staff report of Janu
a
r
y
9
,
1
9
8
1
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
addition:
1.- No more intense zoning than 1-5 for the proposed
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
Torjesen seconded, motion carried 5-0.
q ‘s
qt,tp
approved
Planning Commission Minutes
December 8, 1980
MEMBERS ABSENT: Seaman & Levitt
C. MTS/MCC INDUSTRIAL CAMPUS, by MTS Systems Corpor-
ation and Magnetic Controls Company. Request for
PUD Concept approval of industrial and commercial
uses upon 150 acres. Located off of the Southeast
corner of Mitchell Road and T.H. 5. A public hearing.
The Planner suggested that the commission hear a presentation from
John WOrrall representing both MIS and MCC, from Brauer and Associates,
and refer the item to staff for a report. '
Woi-rall'i.eviewed the proposal, stated that the proponent wants to
develop the property as an industi461 campus.
Sutliff asked if the proposed street would be a service road. The
Planner replied yes and stated that it would be parallel to T.H. 5
and run from Mitchell Road east to West 78th Street.
Torjesen was concerned that West 78th Street runs into floodplain area.
The Planner stated that he felt that it is critical that the site have
access to West 78th Street, and that the staff report and the Purgatory
Creek Study for this area would deal with this question.
Sutliff asked how much fill is planned in the conservancy zone. The
Planner stated that a study will be done to determine that.
Bentley asked if the commission should wait to give recommendations
until the study is completed. The Planner stated yes, that the
proponent could come back at the first meeting in January. Worrell
further stated that the proponent wanted to meet before the commis-
sion to present the project at this time more as an informational item.
MOTION
Bentley moved to continue the public hearing to January 12, 1981 for
a staff report. Torjesen seconded, motion carried 5-0.
111:14011ANDUN
TO:
Perks, Recreation and Natural RCSOUITCS COmmiS51011
FRON: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
--January 15, 1981
SUBJECT: Development Proposal Check Liss
PROJECT:
MTS/MCC Industrial Campus
nomma : MTS Systems Corporation and Magnetic Controls Co.
REQUEST: PUD Concept Plan Approval for Industrial. and Supporting Commercial
Uses on 158.2 acres South of DI 5, east of Mitchell Road, & west of
LOCATION:.
FuLgdtuty Clea
BACKGROUND: Sec Planning Staff Report Dated:
PARK AND RECREATION PLANNING CONCERNS
1. Iypeneclevelopent: An industrial ucamRus_" and ...supportive rrutimprrial enmities
(two restaurants)
2. NumSer of units in residential development: N/A
3. Number i of acres in the project: 158.2
4. Special recreation space requirements:
T S. Adjacent to any existing or proposed parks: he Purgatory Creek Recreation Area encroaches
into this site plan from the cast to the 8/4 contour.
a. Affect on the park : noon C,P911CtifiljLof this des ,elaptnent_the.re —w-i-1-1—licV—to—be
demand for athletic fiblUS- pu ic use of the open space to the
6. Need for a mini park: N/A
Cash park fees will be required upon rezoning of each 7. Cash park fee or land dedication? of
the parcels witTiin this l'UD.
a. If Cash park fee dedication, amount based on existing ordinance will total: $221,480
b. If park land dedication, the number of acres to be dedicated is 0
C. Existing or pending assessments or taxes on proposed park property total N/A
and will be paid prior to dedication.
8. Adjacent to existing or proposed trails: Proposed 8' asphalt trail alon
of Anderson Lakes Parkway.
a. Type of trails Transportation (pedestrian and Bicycle)
b. Construction Material Asphalt
C. Width of trail
8'
cl, Party responsible for construction Ci_ty
ob. landownership of trail location: (dedicated, purchased, ROW) Right -of -way
NATURAL Rrsousff PRISIRVATION CONMNS
1. Site grading plan considers natural amenities of (lie site? The existing natural Tank ies
of this site include two existinZ_PondS_ and the tun_lictlana c raas.---111e—pnpds
will he preserved, the wetlands area will he dredged to create open ponds.
2. Nest significant cut an fill depths on the site arc:
6-8' of fill occurring adjacent to and within the floodplain along the eastern
bonndary of the site.
None
3. Significant vegetation on the site includesLIVA
4. The site grading plan indicates preservation of; the ponds and development of two
new ponds.
S. Adjacent to public waters: NO public waters are envriecl•7,bev_1,_11ILL)LEgalgiy_
Creek flopdplain encroacheA/Anto the eastern edge of this site. •
a. Affect on waters:
REFERENiE CMECK
1. Major Center Area Study: N/A
2. Neighborhood Facilities Study: N/A
3. Purgatory Creek Study : See page 1 of the Planning Staff Report
4. Shoreland Management Ordinance: See page 2 of the Planning Staff Report
S. noodplain ordinance: This proposal conforms with the Floodpinin Ordinance. Sen
page 1 of the Planning Staff Report.
6. Guide Plan : The Guide Plan depicts this area as industrial,
7. Other :
RECOMENDATIONS
I. Adjacent neighborhood type, and any neighborhood opinion voiced in favor or opposed to
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
2. Planning commission Recommendation: On January 12, 1981, the Planning Commission
moved to recommend_the City rntinc Lappinur ?ht gtTS/MCC_PlIII -as_ submitted ,rtd
revised 1/8/81 as per the staff report of Jan. 9, 1981 with the following addition:
3.14<e 0 ,1.4n.yigLc:M i'faripwagadrA s for the proposed industrial uses. Motion carried
unanimously.
Corunu;tIty Services Staff recommends app_r_eval as pc aff
Report.
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
January 9, 1981
MTS/MCC INDUSTRIAL CAMPUS
PUD Concept Plan approval for Industrial and
supporting commercial uses on 158.2 acres of
land.
LOCATION: :
REFER TO:
Existing Land Use
MIS currently has a 290,000 square foot industrial building on approximately
25 acres of land. The current MIS area is zoned 1-5 (5 acre minimum industrial).
Guide Plan
The 1979 Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts this area as industrial, therefore
the general land use of service commercial proposed, is considered supporting
commercial.
Flood Plain
of this area or ln is proposed to be filled. No public waters are involved.
The recent Purgatory Creek Study indicates that there will be more than
17.9 acres of the site falls within Purgatory Creek Flood Plain. 1:8 acres
sufficient flood storage capacity crated in the overall flood plain. This
filling should be reviewed by the Watershed District, but on the face does
not seem to be a problem.
(1974) Purgatory Creek Stucl
The 100 scale maps of the Purgatory Creek Study indicated that the flood
plain in this area is at about the 824 contour. In doing the graphics for
the study booklet, the consultant inadvertently moved to the 828 contour.
This error brought both the Conservancy Area and the flood plain well within
the site as now proposed. Had the lines been drawn correctly, the proposal
would be largely in conformance with the Conservancy Zone as drawn.
1981 Purgatory Creek Study
The 19/4 Purgatory Creek Study defined this area of the creek as a large
heterogeneous monoculture with regard to value as a wildlife area. The
on study really recommended a more specific look be taken of the
area to determine specifically how it should be developed and managed.
Anderson Lakes Park has been acquired because of its existing unique wildlife
habitat features. lhis large flood plain is not of the same value to wildlife.
Its chief value is that of flood storage, and the large scale of it as a
visual open area.
The 1981 Purgatory Creek Study gives a concept possibility for this area
to be developed into a recreational facility that would accomplish the
following goals:
LiC,9
South of TH 5, east of Mitchell Road, and west of
Purgatory Creek.
MTS/MCC Development Brochure
Staff Report-MTS/MCC page 2
1. Preserve and create adequate flood storage area without affecting
downstream flow.
2. Create an 18 hole municipal golf course which would be a recreational
and visual amenity for both the MCA area and the City as a whole.
3. Create a future centralized active athletic field area for the city
near the highest density area of town.
4. Provide a mechanism for the flood plain to be both conveyed to the
city and developed at little cost to the city.
The relationship to the recreational area suggested by the 1981 Creek Study
is visual, not a wildlife habitat impact. For this reason, it will be
important for not only the buildings adjacent to the Conservancy Area, but
the entire industrial campus to be developed carefully and of a highest
quality of architecture. This industrial campus should not be of a trad-
itional spec industrial building quality.
Special attention should be paid to careful' massing of the bUildings,
building colors, materials, textures, windows, blank walls, treatment of
mechanical equipment, loading areas, parking areas, landscaping, lighting
signage, and pedestrian circulation.
These items should all be part of the review of the individual industrial
buildings. If done carefully, the project will be in conformance with the
Purgatory Creek Study.
Shoreland Management Ordinance
The Commercial uses must be in 2 acre minimum lots; setback 150 feet from
the Creek.
The IndOstrial lots must be 5 acres in size and the buildings setback 150
feet from the Creek.
The area within 300 feet of the Creek shall not contain any more than 30%
impervious surface. The proposal appears to be in conformance with this.
Existing Site Character
RefeTto page 8 of the development brochure.
Grading.
The site is steeply rolling, varying from a low of about 818 to a high
point of about 870. However, the buildable portion , of the site ranges from
about 830 to 860. Although the mean elevations of the site will be preserved
in order to provide large pads for the buildings and parking, the cut and
fill required will be within 10 feet from original grades.
The mass grading plan is well thought out and the four pond areas,
reshaped, are retained and made focal points of the site plan.
MTS's concept of burying part of the building expansion makes good sense as
the roof will double as a parking area. This approach and the ability to
use earth sheltering as well as incorporate passive solar use should be
explored more fully in the individual site plans. Each site shld be earth
balanced individualyso as not to requi,rAmerall site grading u the Mire PUD at
although
Staff Report-MTS/MCC page 3
Drainage
A drainage plan must be submitted as a part of a development plan for any
rezonings.
Transportation
Construction of the central east/west road is critical to any future develop-
ment of the property. With close to 13,000 A.D.T. possible from this area,
it is obvious that Mitchell Road by itself will not handle the traffic.
Gaining access to another full signalized intersection at West 78th Street
and TH 5 will help, however, construction of the Ring Route from TH 5 down
to US 169/212 and Anderson Lakes Parkway southeast from this property to
US 169/212 will provide additional regional access. In the long run, provision
of adequate collector roads throuTiout the community will greatly reduce
traffic problems. Eden Prairie's goal of providing housing for all employees
in the City will become increasingly important.
MIS and MCC should register their employees with Minnesota Ride Share, which
will match their employees free of charge for car pooling and van pooling.
This approach saves the employees money, provides a larger pool of potential
employees and saves the employer money through the reduction of parking
spaces that have to be provided.
Pedestrian System
In an industrial park of this size, it is essential that a pedestrian system
be provided to: give employees access to recreation areas, eating areas,
and noon-time recreation opportunity. Wilson Learning Center e concept of
a running track could be expanded greatly and applied to this industrial
campus. The close proximity of this site to the potential recreation area
. to the east highlights the importance of an interelated pedestrian system.
No system has been proposed, but should be developed and submitted to the
City.
Interstate 212
The 212 Corridor runs diagonally through this site. Most of the buildings
would not be effected and the corridor is largely preserved by locating
parking lots and open space areas within the corridor rather than structures.
This entire industrial park will also probably take several years to
develop totally. During this time it is possible that MnDOT will be able to
make more positive plans. This will allow some additional time for the
corridor to remain relatively open.
EAW
This project will require an Environmental Assessment Worksheet prior to
rezoning.
Ordinance Reqpirements
The 1=-5 zoninciict prohibits outside storage; this Will help insure
a high quality image.
Setbacks in an 1-5 District are greater than other Industrial Districts and
lot sins are 5 acre minimums. This will help to insure the larger campus
look of the area.
Staff Report-MTS/MCC page 4
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff finds that the PUD Concept Plan proposed by MTS/MCC is
consistant with the Comprehensive Guide Plan and recommends approval subject
to the following:
1. The flood plain encroachment must be approved by the Riley-Purgatory
Creek Watershed District.
2. The plan must be in conformance with the Shoreland Management Act.
3. An east/west road must be constructed from Mitchell Road to West 78th
Street in order to facilitate development.
4. A pedestrian system plan must be developed incorporating the goals of
this report.
5. An EAW must be prepared prior to a rezoning application.
6. The plan is approved in Concept only as it relates to the 1974 Purgatory
Creek Conservancy Zone and individual sites will be evaluated at the
time of rezoning to ascertain whether they are visually compatible and
may encroach on the Purgatory Creek open space area.
7. The overall site should not be graded at this time.
CE:ss
OsEs°74 .sit.
Minnesota of Transportation
1.01_ e 2055 No. Lilac Drive
t District 5
"PovolOc" Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422.
January 20, 1981
(612) 545-3761
Mr. Chris Eager
Director of Planning
City of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie City Hall
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
In Reply Refer To: 315
S.P. 2701 T.H. 5
S.P. 2762 T.H. 212 (proposed)
Plat review of proposed MTS/MCC Industrial
C
a
m
p
u
s
located south of TH 5 between Mitchell Road
a
n
d
approximately 3000' east in part of Section
1
5
Township 116 N., Range 22W in the City of Ed
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
Hennepin County
Dear Mr. Enger:
We are in receipt of the above referenced p
l
a
t
f
o
r
o
u
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 P
l
a
t
s
a
n
d
S
u
r
v
e
y
s
.
W
e
f
i
n
d
t
h
e
plat acceptable for further development wit
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
comments:
As you know Mn/D0q has studied many differen
t
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
f
o
r
n
e
w
TH 212 through this area. It appears that a
l
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
w
o
u
l
d
effect this plat as proposed. Because of se
v
e
r
e
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
l
i
m
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
Mn/DOT was forced to cease planning activit
i
e
s
o
n
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
T
h
e
r
e
-
fore we cannot advise you exactly how future
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
m
i
g
h
t
e
f
f
e
c
t
this plat. We suggest the city guide the de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
s
u
c
h
a
m
a
n
n
e
r
that future conflicts are minimized as much
a
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
O
u
r
s
t
a
f
f
is
available on an advisory basis to help accom
p
l
i
s
h
t
h
i
s
g
o
a
l
.
The development will generate a significant
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
n
e
w
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
t
r
i
p
s
.
The city should plan, as a part of this deve
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
u
p
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
M
i
t
c
h
e
l
l
Road. Additional lanes are also needed on T
H
5
a
n
d
w
i
t
h
n
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
in sight we would expect continued deteriora
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
service.
- The existing highway right of way in this
a
r
e
a
i
s
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
b
e
i
n
g
p
l
a
t
t
e
d
.
When the final boundry survey is done the su
r
v
e
y
o
r
s
h
o
u
l
d
c
o
n
t
a
c
t
our
District Land Surveyor, Mr. Keith Slater, a
t
5
4
5
-
3
7
6
1
e
x
t
.
1
9
9
t
o
determine compatible boundries.
03
AnEqualOpportunityEnwkler
.6-71tU
•
Mr. Chris Eager
January 20, 1981
Page 2
If you have any questions in regard to the above comments, please contact our
District Layout, Research and Development Engineer, Mr. J. S. Katz at 545-3761
ext. 150. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
--)
Sincerely,;
/ )-----if
W. M. Crawford, P.E4
District Engineer
•;/
cc: Charles Weaver
Metropolitan Council
' Mike Reiter
Hennepin County Surveyor's Office
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • ':;1-4.;
320 Washington Av. South FT)
% Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 .
935-3381
December 12, 1980
Mr. Chris Enger
Director of Planning
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Dear Mr. Enger:
RE Proposed Plat "MTS/MCC Industrial Campus"
Future CSAH 60 SE Quadrant Mitchell Road and TH 5
Section 15, Township 116, Range 22
Hennepin County Plat No. 884
Review and Recommendations
We reviewed the above plat and found it acceptable with consideration of these
conditions:
-The Hennepin County Transportation System Study (HCTSS) and the latest general
concept map from Eden Prairie show Mitchell Road and proposed Anderson Lakes
Parkway intersecting in a horizontal curve, not a right angle intersection
directly opposite Scenic Heights Road. Hennepin County recommends dedication
of enough right of way to allow for the horizontal curve intersection of
Mitchell Road and proposed Anderson Lake Parkway.
-The developer should dedicate 17 ft. additional right of way along Mitchell
Road making the right of way 50 ft. from the center of Mitchell Road.
Please direct any response or questions to Les Weigelt.
Sincerely,
YJames M. Hold, P.E.
Chief, Planning and Programming
J111.1/LDW: pj
HENNEPIN COUNTY
LO S
an equal opponunl!. mpioyet
Riley- Purgatory Creek Watershed District
8950 COUNTY ROAD pa
EDEN PRAIRIE. MINNESOTA 55344
December 4, 1980
Mr. Chris Enger
City Planner
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Re: MTS Systems Corporation and Magnetic Controls
Company: Eden Prairie
Dear Mr. Enger:
The engineering advisors to the Board of Managers of the Riley-Purgatory
Creek Watershed District has reviewed the preliminary plans submitted to
the District for the above referenced project. The following policies and
criteria of the Watershed District are applicable for this project.
1, The District notes that an encroachment into the 100-year floodplain
of Purgatory Creek is proposed as part of this development. Our
calculations indicate that this proposed encroachment meets the
encroachment criteria set forth by the Watershed District.
2. The District notes that the proposed development encroaches into
the conservancy area, as indicated in the Purgatory Creek Corridor
and Open Space Study. This conflict must be resolved prior to
final approval.
3. In accordance with Section E(2) of the District's Revised Rules
and Regulations, a grading and land alteration permit will be
required from the District for this project. Accompanying this
permit application, a detailed plan outlining how sediment will
be controlled both during and after construction must be submitted
to the District for review and approval.
Because of the size of the proposed development, the District
requires that grading operations be staged to minimize the amount
of area altered at any one time.
4. A detailed storm sewer plan must be submitted to the District for
review and approval. It is the policy of the Watershed District
to require permanent settling ponds or inundation areas to remove
Mr. Chris Eager
Page 2
December 4, 1980
sediment and other undesirable material from stormwater runoff
from major developments of this type. We note that no stormwater
settling ponds or inundation areas are shown on the plans submitted
to date. Consideration should be given to the construction of
settling ponds within the development.
5. The District notes that West 78th Street is proposed to be extended
through this development and will eventually result in a crossing
of Purgatory Creek. The District will require that plans for
West 78th Street and the proposed crossing of Purgatory Creek be
submitted to the District so that a) the crossing may be designed
in accordance with the Watershed District criteria, and b) the
net encroachment into the floodplain, if proposed, may be determined
to ensure that the proposed location of the roadway meets the
District criteria.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this development at an
early date. If you have any questions regarding the District's comments,
please call us at 920-0655.
Royert C. Obermeyeit
BARR ENGINEERING CO.
Engineers for the District
RC0/111
c: Mr. Frederick Richards
Mr. Frederick Rahr
Mr. John Worral
trn
LD-80-PUD-16
MTS/MCC
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 81-35
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MTS/MCC
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of Ordinance 135
provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas
located within the City, and
WHEREAS, the MTS/MCC PUD is considered a consistent use based upon the
Comprehensive Guide Plan, and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Csmmission did hold a public hearing
on MTS/MCC's request for PUD approval for industrial and commercial
uses and recommended approval of the PUD Concept to the City Council, and
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on February 17,
1981.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota as follows:
1. The MTS/MCC PUD, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota,
and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, attached
hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD approval as outlined
in the application material dated November 17, 1980.
3. That the PUD meet the recommendations of the Planning
Commission dated January 12, 1981.
ADOPTED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie this
day of
, 1981.
Wolfng H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL
q17
Legal Descriptions The legal descriptions for the project are as follows: Legal Description #1: That part of the North 1/2 of Section 15, Township-116-North, Range 22, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at a point in the West line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 15, distant 1,632.12 feet South of the Northwest corner thereof; thence South along said West line to the Southwest corner of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 15; thence East along the South line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 15 a distance of 75 rods; thence North parallel with the Nest line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 15 to a point distant 871.65 feet South from the Southwesterly line of State Highway Number 5; thence deflecting left 112 degrees, 35 minutes, 29 seconds to the West line of the East 600 feet of the West 75 rods of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 15; thence North along said West line to its intersection with a line bearing North 74 degrees, 29 minutes, 20 seconds East from the point of beginning; thence South 74 degrees, 29 minutes, 20 seconds, West to the point of beginning, except that portion lying Northerly of the following described line; Commencing at the North-west corner of said Section 15; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees, — 38 minutes, 02 seconds West along the West line of said Section, a distance of 1,632.12 feet; thence North 74 degrees, 29 minutes, 20 seconds East a distance of . 34.36 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 89 degrees, 21 minutes, 58 seconds East a distance of 200 feet; thence along a tangential curve, concave to the North radius 383.10 feet, central angle 51 degrees, 51 minutes, 08 seconds a distance of 344.47 feet to a point on the North line of the above described property and there terminating, according to the Government Survey, thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Legal Description #2: That part of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 15, Township 116 North, Range 22 West. . Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Section 15; thence along the West line of said Section on an assumed bearing of South 00 29' 22" West 151.31 feet to the actual point of beginning. Thence South along the said West line 1,480.81 feet; thence North 74° 20' 40" East 663.67 feet; thence northeasterly 649.15 feet more or less to the intersection with the East line of the West 75 rods of the North 1/2 of Section 15, said point is located 871.65 feet South from the
00*, Southwesterly line of State Highway Number 5; thence North 60° 06' 58° East 1,105.81 feet more or less to the intersection with the Southerly line of State Highway Number 5; thence Northwesterly along said Southerly line to the point of beginning. Except the West 637.5 feet of said described property. Legal Description #3: The East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 15, Township 116, Range 22 lying South of State Highway Number 5; that part of the West 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 'of Section 15, Township 116, Range 22 lying East of the Westerly 75 rods and South of State Trunk Highway Number 5 except that part of the above described tracts lying northwesterly of the following described line: Commencing at a point in the East line of said West 75 rods, distant 871.65 feet South of the Southerly right-of-way line said Highway Number 5, thence Northeasterly at an angle of 59 degrees, 37 minutes, 36 seconds with said line to the Southerly right-of-way line of said Highway Number 5. That part of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 15, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4; thence running North along the East line of said West 1/2 of the North-east 1/4 978.25 feet; thence deflecting to the left 48 degrees, 45 minutes, 21 seconds and running Northwesterly 83.44 feet; thence deflecting to the left 20 degrees, 30 minutes, 30 seconds and running Northwesterly 297.47 feet; thence deflecting to the right 3 degrees. 06 minutes, 30 seconds and running Northwesterly 215.82 feet; thence deflecting to the right 11 degrees, 50 minuteS, 40 seconds and running Northwesterly 60.13 feet; thence deflecting to the left 13 degrees, 57 minutes, 50 seconds and running Northwesterly 100.66 feet; thence deflecting to the right 16 degrees, 18 minutes, 10 seconds and running Northerwesterly 506.65 feet; thence deflecting to the right 46 degrees, 56 minutes, 30 seconds and running Northwesterly 269.27 feet; thence deflecting to the right 7 degrees, 45 minutes and running Northerly to the Southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway Number 5; thence Southwesterly along said Southerly line to the West line of the North-east 1/4; thence South along said West line to the Southwest corner of said Northeast 1/4; thence East along said South line to the point of beginning.
Minutes-Parks, Recreation & unapproved
Natural Resources Commission -4- February 2, 1981
MEMBERS ABSENT: none
1. DeVelooment Proposal —Eden Glen
John Shardlow of H. Dahlgren and Assooiates was present on behalf
of the developer, Jesco, Inc.
Shardlow located the project northwest of Eden Prairie Center,
bordered on the east by U.S. 169/212. He said the present access
onto 169 will be eliminated and the stop lights on either end of
the project will be used as access.
Shardlow said approximately 187,000 eu.yds. of fill will be required
for the site. Currently there are 35,000 cu.yds. of fill stockpiled
on the site. He said they plan a 35 ft. setback along 169 and 17-i
foot setbacks along interior roadways. The builder plans to have
building covenants (including planting plans) for people buying into
the area, which will provide a desireable continuity to the project.
Shardlow showed proposed trail connections and sidewalks.
Kingrey asked how the oak trees on the site would be saved? Shardlow
said it is hoped grading and development can occur well outside the •
drip line of the trees, but if they find fill procedures to be too
extensive, the trees may not survive.
Anderson asked that a provision be put into the development agreement
that if problems occur in saving the trees, the issue will be brought
back before this Commission for approval.
Shardlow said snow fencing would be put around the trees to indicate
to workmen that the trees are to be saved.
NOTION: Kingrey moved to approve the Eden Glen PO Concept approval
in accordance with Staff recommendations. This Commission expresses
great concern in preserving existing vegetation to the extent shown
in the plan, and that the developer come back before this Commission
if problems in preserving the vegetation arrise, and that a snow fence
be put up to show the vegetation is not to be intruded upon. VanKeter
seconded the motion and it carried unanimously.
DISCUSSION: Anderson asked that Lambert check on the possibility of
placing performance bonds on large stands of trees to insure that they
be Bayed. Joseen suggested perhaps there arc other alternatives in
solving this problem, and Lambert said he would come back at the next
mooting with possible actions.
approved
Planning Commission Minutes
January 12, 1981
MEMBERS ABSENT: Bearman & Retterath
D. EDEN GLEN, by Jesco, Inc. Request for PUD Concept
approval of commercial and office uses upon 15
acres. Located between Eden Road and Single Tree
Lane, West of US 169/212. A public hearing. .
The Planner stated that this a PUD Concept request, and introduced Mr. John '
Shardlow, Dahlgren & Assoc,. Inc. to give the presentation.
Shardlow gave a brief slide presentation and reviewed the land uses proposed,
grading plan, drainage, landscaping, utilities, access, and site plan.
The Planner reviewed the staff report dated 1/9/81.
Gartner asked if any of the restaurants have been identified yet. Shardlow replied
yes, but they were not at liberty to disclose these buyers at this time.
Mr. Beckman, 8025 Eden Road asked what the rear yard setback to his home was on
Lot 6. The Planner replied 15 was proposed but 20 is required.
Sutliff asked if there will be a fire lane in the setback. The Planner replied no.
Hallett asked if moving the setback from 15' to 20' would be a problem to the
propenent. Shardlow replied no.
Levitt asked The Planner to state his views on allowing the northern restaurant
to be built prior to construction of the internal road. The Planner stated that
fast food restaruants create the most traffic and access through a signalized
intersection was important.
Gartner commented that residents will want a traffic light if fast food restaurants
are constructed.
Hallett asked if there is a signal light by Mark's Standard. The Planner replied yes.
Sutliff asked if there will be a considerable amount of grading to occur and stated
that he felt that the land should be developed from south to north to keep the drainagc
open into Lake Idlewild. Shardlow replied that the site was low and would require appi
imately 100,000 cubic yards of fill.
Shardlow stated that the interior road would be completed through the subdivision before
occupancy of buildings.
Mr. Beckman, 8025 Eden Road asked what type of drainage there will be. Shardlow
replied that they have not done the engineering work yet, for this concept stage.
Cal Anderson, 7214 Topvicw Road, was concerned that the culvert under Eden Road
remain open during construction but, stated that he welcomes development in this area.
Shardlow stated that the proponent wants to fill from south to north to keep drainage
flowing toward Lake Idlewild.
1472-
Llf3
Planning Commission Minutes -2-
approved
January 12, 1981
MOTION 1
Gartner moved to close the public hearing on Eden Glen
P
U
D
.
T
o
r
j
e
s
e
n
s
e
c
o
n
d
e
d
,
motion carried 5-0.
MOTION 2
Gartner moved to recommend to the City Council approval o
f
t
h
e
E
d
e
n
G
l
e
n
P
U
D
a
s
p
e
r
t
h
e
2 brochures and the January 9, 1981 staff report with the
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
:
1. That the interior road be completed before occupancy
o
f
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
.
Sutliff seconded.
DISCUSSION
Torjesen asked if the above addition was added in leiu o
f
•
7
o
f
t
h
e
s
t
a
f
f
r
e
p
o
r
t
.
Gartner replied no.
Motion carried 5-0.
INENORANDUI4
TO:
FRC41:
DATE:'
SUBJECT:
PROJECT:
Parks .„ Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Rob Lambert, Director of Community Services
January 30, 1981
Development Proposal Check List
Eden Glen
PROPONENT: Jesco. Inc.
iteoutsT: PUD Concept Approval for Restaurant, retail and office uses on 15.2 arrPs of
land.
LOCATION: Northwest of Fdpn Prairie renter nnpdpred on the east by U.S 169/212.
'BACKGROUND: See Planning Staff Report Dated:
PARK AND RECREATION PLANNING CONCERNS
1. Type of development: gQr_Ufll_andafface Re ional Comm • •
2. Number of units in residential development :N/A
3. Number of acres in the project: 15.2
4. Special recreation space requirements:
N/A
S. Adjacent to any existing or proposed parks: NQ
a. Affect on the park:
6. Need for a mini park: No
7. Cash park fee or land dedication?Cash Pa r k Fee
a. If Cash park fee dedication, amount based on existing ordinance will total: $21,280
If park land dedication, the number of acres to be dedicated is
N/A
c. Existing or pending assessments or taxes on proposed park property total
N/A
and will be paid prior to dedication.
8. Adjacent to existing or proposed 8' asphalt bikeway adacent to Edon Road
5' concrete sidewalk adjacent to thru street.
a. Type of trails Bikeway/Pedestrain
b. Construction Material Asphalt and Concrete
c. Width of trail 8' and 5'
d. Party responsible for construction Developer
c.. Landownership of trail location:(dedicated, purchased, ROW) Right-of-way
NATURAL lasouncc rusrinrAlloN coNcrkss
1. Site grading pinn considers natural amenities of the site? Thc_proposed site plan
_does,a-nood-joh-of Pros-04m-ing-tho_few oak frpnc thit_anc_Ior ,tpd ip tho N'l-portiop
OT the sift'.
2. Most significant cut and rill depths on the site arc: The most significant grading....or.curz-
along the proposed thru street and alono the southern portion Ol_the hill on
the west sidF -ofThe site.
N/A
3. Significant vegetation on the site includes: The office building on the northwest corner
I. Tho Rreservation of the oak trees on tqo hill. See Planning Staff Report dated site g rading plan ineicates preserva,ton
. January 9, 1981
Not adjacent to public waters, but is within 200' of Lake
S. Adiaieg i yu blic waters: l p
,a. Affect on waters: NIA .
REFERENCE CHECK
I. kljorCenterAxea Study: Proposed land uses are consistent with the mrA Stunly
2. Neighborhood Facilities Study : N/A
3. Purgatory Creek Study: N/A
4. Shoreland Management Ordinance: SPP Planning Staff Report
S. Floodplain Ordinance : N/A
6. Guide Plan: The Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts regional commercial in this ern
7. Other:
RECONETNPATIONS
1. Adjacent neighborhood type, and any neighborhood opinion voiced in favor or opposed to the project:
2. Planning Commission Recommendation: Planning Copmission unanimously approved this proposal
ac per staff report_af—Ja_nuar-y g, 1931 with the add4tion that the—enter-for---
road be completed before construction of buildings.
3. Community Services Staff Recommendations: Comunity Services staff recommends approval
as per the January 9, 1981 Mannino Staff Report with the follnviop Pxrnptinn.
The trail adjacent to Eden Road shouldia31111_11sphalt taeway/pedestrain
_way as this is a major street thru the MCA.
STAFF REPORT
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE:
January 9, 1981
SUBJECT:
EDEN GLEN
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
REFER TO:
PUD Concept Approval for restaurant, retail,
and office uses on 15.2 acres of land.
Northwest of Eden Prairie Center. Bordered
on the east by U.S. 169/212, on the north
and west by Eden Road on the south by Single
Tree Lane.
Development Submission Material
MCA Report
The proposed land uses are consistent with the Major Center Area Planned Unit
Development.
Guide Plan
The 1979 Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts Regional Commercial in this area.
The proposed uses would be consistent with this land use designation.
Existing Zoning
Rural, rezoning and platting necessary for development.
Surrounding Land Uses
To the north and west are existing single family homes which are expected
to transition to more intense MCA uses in the future.
Immediately to the north, adjacent to Lake Idlewild, is the approved site
for condominium office buildings.
On the east, across U.S. 169/212 from north to south are; The Presbyterian
Church, Eden Prairie Body Shop, Wye Mobil, and the Eden Prairie Center.
To the south, across Single Tree Lane is Mark's Standard, and the approved
future Single Tree Office Building.
The 15.2 acre project surrounds an existing single family residence fronting
Eden Road on the west side of the project.
Flood Plain Ordinance
No part of this project is within a flood plain area.
Public Waters
ATC6(741 Chel'e is a low wet portion of the site, it is not classified public
waters.
Lac-
Staff Report-Eden Glen page 2
Shoreland Management Ordinance
The project is within 200 feet of Lake Idlewild. Although this lake has
not been classified by the DNR for shoreland purposes, it is 13 acres in
size which would bring it about the 10 acre size required by the DNR in
order to be considered for shoreland.
The project does not abut Lake IdleWild so it is not considered such for
design standards. The Act does limit impervious surface coverage for area
within 1000 feet of lakes to 30% if other mitigative measures are not ut-
ilized. The proposal would be about 60% coverage. However, it is within
the MCA PUD, which would allow variance from this standard. Lake
Idlewild is planned as part of the storm water system for this area,
and an improvement for an outlet co the lake will soon be under way which
this property will share assessments for.
Special drop manholes, catch basins, and grit chambers can be utilized as
part of this proposal in order to mitigate the 60% coverage.
EAW
ThiS project does not meet the mandatory thresholds for preparation of an
Environmental Assessment Worksheet.
Existing Site Character
This is described on pages 5, 6, 81 7, of the development brochure.
Grading
The eastern portion of the site has been recently indescriminately filled
and will have to be regraded and recompacted.
The site will be developed largely by filling in order to bring the mean
elevation of the site closer to grade with the surrounding roads. This
filling will have to occur from south to north. in order to allow continuous
drainage of the site. Approximately 15 feet of fill will have to be placed
in the low center of the site, however, the sites adjacent to U.S. 169/212
will still be approximately 10 feet lower than the highway. (Refer to
sections on page 9 of the Development Brochure).
Drainage
The drainage for the site will be split in the center of the site, with the
north half flowing toward Lake Idlewild and the south half flowing into
the storm sewer system in Single Tree Lane.
Building Orientation
The buildings along U.S. 169/212 are lower than the highway. This makes
views of the parking and of the rooftop mechanical equipment possible.
Since the proponents are choosing to provide a 35 setback to the highway
rather than 50, the slope becomes steeper, and any plant material used to
interrupt the site lines are pushed closer to the road. ,
The master landscaping plan submitted illustrates slope stabilization along
this bank, With sporadic use of screening material. The screening of
parking from U.S. 169-212 must be continuous as required by ordinance.
Screening of mechanical equipment on top of the buildings must be handled
as an intregal architectual part of the building, not an add on fence.
qri
Staff Report-Eden Glen page 3
The office building in the northwest corner of the site relates well, in
Concept, to the trees. Preservation of these trees should be a require-
ment in subsequent rezoning.
Ordinance Requirements
The Site Plan is not consistent with City setback requirements. Setbacks
from the central spine road should be 35 feet rather than 15 feet as shown.
Parking is not allowed within a frontyard setback except on a corner lot,
where parking is allowed within one-half of the frontyard setback of the
more minor street.
Parking proposed for the restaurants seems to meet or exceed requirement
while parking planned for the retail and the office (on lot 6) is low.
The Design 'ramework indicates a common fixture and height in a lighting
System which is good.
With regard o the signs, no further framework has been provided other than
the City's cxisting sign ordinance, however, wall mounted signs for the
buildings along U.S. 169-212 would help to alleviate the problem of a
free-standing sign clutter that would result from each small user along
U.S. 169-212 having a free-standing sign near the raod.
Transportation
Access to the site will be from Single Tree Lane and from Eden Road. Single
Tree Lane is improved and there is an existing stop lot at the intersection
with U.S. 169-212/ Eden Road is currently a gravel street and it will require
improvement to provide access for lots 5 and 7, and to provide improved
access to U.S. 169-212.
There is no signal at Eden Road and no time established for one. The ROW
and street for Eden Road has been realigned so that it makes a correct
intersection with U.S. 169/212 and Leona Road.
There is an existing curb cut on U.S. 169/212 west across from West 78th Street.
This cut will not be utilized by this development; access will be taken
completely from the newly proposed road between Eden Road and Single Tree
Lane. This will help to lithit the number of access points to U.S. 169/212 on
the west side.
Development of the site should be from the south to the north in order to
allow access to a signalized intersection.
Pedestrian circulation through the site is proposed through a sidewalk along
one side of the internal road. Sidewalks should also be included along
Eden Road and Single Tree Lane. Each individual site plan, when submitted
should incorporate provision for connection to this pedestrian system.
et
qi9
Staff Report-Eden Glen page 4
RECOMMENDATIONS
the Planning Staff finds that the land uses proposed are consistent with the
Comprehensive Guide Plan and recommends approval of the 15.2 acre PUD subject
to the following:
1. Coverage of over 30% (impervious surface) be approved by the DNR and
Watershed District.
2. The Master Landscaping Plan be revised to reflect screening of the
' parking areas.
3. The Design Framework Manual include a modified signage program that
utilizes wall signs rather than free-standing signs on the U.S. 169/212 side.
4. That the plan be revised to reflect 'Ordinance #135 setback requirements.
5. The pedestrian system be added to include Eden Road and Single Tree Lane.
6. The 'wooded area on lot 7 be preserved as proposed.
7. That exterior material be similar or complementary throughout as proposed
in the Design Framework Manual but that the use of wood as an exterior
material be limited to 25% of the wall area.
CE:ss •
Minnesota
Department of Transportation
District 5
2055 No. Lilac Drive
O f Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
'January 19, 1981
(62) 545.3761
Mr. Chris Enger
Planning Director
City of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie City Hall
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 .
In Reply Refer To: 315
S.P. 2744 T.H. 169
Plat -review of Eden Glen P.U.D.
located West of TB 169 and South of Eden Road
in part of Lots 18 and 19, Auditors Subdivision
No. 335, in the City of Eden Prairie,
Hennepin County
Dear Mr. Eager:
We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. We find the
plat acceptable for forther development with consideration ,of the following-
comments:
- Final lot boundries adjacent to the trunk highway right of Way should
be determined after consultation with our District Land Surveyor
Mr. Keith Slater.
- The grading plan indicates some work on Mn/DOT right of way. Before any
work is started on Mn/DOT right of way the contractor must have an
approval permit from our district office.
- The development as planned relates very well to inplace TB 169. This and
other developments planned for the Major Center Area, if successful, will
generate a significant number of vehicle trips. Therefore, Eden Prairie
should make every effort to develop additional transportation facilities,
such as the Ring Road, to share the burden of the added trips to and from
the area.
If you have any questions in regard to the above comments, please contact our
District Layout, Research and Development Engineer, Mr. J. S. Katz at 545-3761
ext. 150. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Since el)"? /
../
/'--.N./!.4 if-,
W: M. Crawfcird,'1".B. ,/
District Engineer 7
cc: Charles Weaver, Metropolitan Council
Mike Reiter, Hennepin County Surveyor's Office
An Equal Opportunity Employer 0)
HOWARD DAHLGREN ASSOCIATES
mcon.onmeD
CONSULTING PLANNERS
ONE °IRO's/ELAND TERRACE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55403
•12•31,311311
14 January 1981
Mayor Wolfgang Penzel and Members of the City Council
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
RE: Request for Public Hearing Date for Eden Glen Commercial PUD
Dear Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council:
At their 12 January meeting, the City Planning Commission voted
unanimously to recommend concept approval for the 15.2 acre Eden
Glen Planned Unit Development. We have reviewed and discussed
the recommendations contained in the Planning Staff Report
regarding our development, we have found them to be reasonable,
and have revised our plans to comply with them. Therefore,
consistent with the City's development review and approval process,
we are requesting, on behalf of Jesco, Inc., that a date be set
for a public hearing on our proposal. Thank you for your
consideration on this matter and we look forward to appearing
before you to answer any questions which you may have about our
development.
cc: Jon Pope
Bill Quinlan
tlq I
Sincerely
Royert C. Obermeyer
BARR ENGINEERING CO.
Engineers for the District
Co.
Riley- Purgatory Creek Watershed District
8950 COUNTY ROAD s4
' EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344
January 8, 1981
Mr; Chris Enger
City Planner
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Re: Eden Glen Development
Dear Mr. Enger:
The engineering advisors to the Board of Managers of the Riley-Purgatory
Creek Watershed District has reviewed the preliminary plans submitted to the
District for the Eden Glen Development. The following policies and criteria
of the Watershed District are applicable for this project.
1. In accordance with Section E(2) of the District's Revised Rules
and Regulations, a grading and land alteration 'permit will be
required from the District for this project. Accompanying this
permit application, a detailed erosion control plan outlining how
sediment will be controlled both during and after construction
must be submitted to the District for review and approval.
2. A detailed storm sewer plan must be submitted to the District for
review and approval.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this development at an
early date. If you have any questions regarding the District's comments,
please call us at 920-0655.
RC0/111
c: Mr. Frederick Richards
Mr. Frederick Bahr
41)2
LO-80-PUD-18
• Eden Glen
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 80-36
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE EDEN GLEN PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE GUIDE
PLAN AND THE MAJOR CENTER AREA PUB
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of Ordinance 135
provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas
located within the City, and
WHEREAS, the Eden Glen PUD is considered consistent with the
Comprehensive Guide Plan and the Major Center Area PUD, and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduCt a public hearing
on Jesco Inc.'s request for PUB approval of the PUD Concept to the
City Council, and
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on February 17,
1981.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota as follows:
1. The Eden Glen PUD, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota,
and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, attached
hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD approval as outlined
in the application material dated January 12, 1981.
3. That the PUD meet the recommendations of the Planning
Commission dated January 12, 1981.
ADOPTED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie this
day of
, 1981.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL
495
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Eden Glen, Eden Prairie
Description for Parcel 1
That part of Lot 19, Auditor's Subdivision No. 335, according to th
e
plat, thereof on file and of record in the office of the County
Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies westerly of a line
drawn parallel with and distant 40.00 feet westerly of, as measured
perpendicular to Line 1 as described below and that part which lies
southerly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 33.00 feet
southerly of, as measured perpendicular to Line 2 as described below
:
Line 1. Begining at a point on the east and west quarter line of
Section 14, Township 116 North, Range 22 West, distant 2,557.59
feet west of the east quarter corner thereof, thence run north-
easterly at an angle of 45 degrees, 37 minutes, 00 seconds from
said east and west quarter line (measured from east to north) for
603.19 feet; thence deflect to the left on a tangential curve
having a radius of 1,432.40 feet and a delta angle of 43 degrees,
40 minutes, 45 seconds for 1,01.98 feet; thence on a tangent to
said curve for 443.56 feet and there terminating.
Line 2. Beginning at a point on Line 1 described above, distant
212.20 feet southerly of its point on termination; thence run
westerly at an angle of 88 degrees, 46 minutes, 20 seconds from
said Line 1 (measured from south to west) for 187.60 feet; thence
deflect to the left on a tangential curve having a radius of
477.45 feet and a delta angle of 21 degrees, 00 minutes, 16 seconds,
for 175.04 feet; thence on tangent to said curve for 50 feet and
there terminating.
Description for Parcel 2
Lot 18, except that part described as follows: the south 1,098.54 feet
of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 14,
Township 116, Range 22 lying west of the east 675.0 feet thereof ard•
except that part which runs northerly of a line run parallel with and distant 33 feet southerly of Line I described below.
Line 1 From a point on the east and west quarter line of said — . _
Section 14, distant 2,557.59 feet west of the east quarter corner
thereof, run northeasterly at an angle of 45 degrees, 57 minutes,
00 seconds, from said east and west quarter line (measured from
east to north) for 1,177.21 feet: thence deflect to the left at an angle of 43 degrees, 40 minutes, 4', secomls for 8O5.43 feet to the
point of lif`qi toil nj of I, no I to he described; thence deflect to the
left at an angle of gl degrees, 11 minutes, 40 seconds for 107.
6
0
feet; thesce aeflevt to the left on a tangential curve having a
ExhIbil-
irsq
radius of 477.45 feet and a delta angle of 21 degrees 00 minutes,
16 seconds for 175.04 feet; thence on tangent to sqd curve for
160 feet and there terminating.
"Auditor's Subdivision Number 335 Hennepin County, Minnesota"
'according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of
the Registrar of Titles in and for said County.
Subject to a permanent slope easement over part of above land as shown
in Deed Doc. No. 1176170, files of Registrar of Titles.
Along with Tract A of Registered Land Survey No. 1449.
MEMO
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
John Frane, Acting City Manager
Carl Jullie, City Engineer
February 12, 1981
Vacation Hearin j for Vacating a Part of Plaza
Drive and Related Drainage and Utility Easements
in the Menard Addition
Menard, Inc., has requested final plat approval of the Menard Addition
Replat. Approval of this plat will allow the relocation of Plaza Drive
to an area of better soil conditions and improve the intersection point
with Schooner Boulevard. Upon approval of this replat it will be neces-
sary to vacate a part of a portion of Plaza Drive and related easements
which will no longer be needed. Drawings showing showings showing the
location of the proposed vacations were included with the Council's
January 20, 1981 packets:
It is recommended that the Council adopt Resolution No. R81-
vacating said portions of Plaza Drive and related drainage and
utility easements in Menard Addition.
CJJ:kh
Attachments
LW ,
Feb. 17, 1981
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R81-40
RESOLUTION VACATING A PART OF PLAZA
DRIVE WITHIN THE PLAT OF MENARD ADDI-
TION AND RELATED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
EASEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain right-of-way
described as fillows
That part of Plaza Drive, as platted in Menard Addition,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of the
following described line and its northilesterly extension:
Commencing at the most southerly corner of said --
Outlot F, the Southwesterly line of which has an
assumed bearing of N 45 0 0000W, thence north-
easterly, along the southerly line of said
Outlot F, being a non tangential curve concave
to the northwest having a central angle of
9°49'20", a radius of 759.61 feet., a chord
bearing of N 49°5440" E, and an arc distance of
130.22 feet to the point of beginning of the
line to be described; thence South 45 °0000" East
and normal to last described curve, a distance of
60.31 feet to the southeasterly line of said
Menard Addition and there terminating, and
That part of Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot D, both in-Menard Addition,
as platted and of record in the office of the County Recorder,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying 30.00 feet northwesterly of
and 10.00 feet southeasterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot 1,
thence south 45 0 0000" east, bearing assumed, along the
southwesterly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 185.00
feet; thence south 45 0 0000" west, along said southwest-
erly line, a distance of 60.00 feet; thence south
45 °0000" east, along said southwesterly line, a distance
of 134.00 feet; thence north 45°0000" east, a distance
of 215.00 feet to the point of R of the line
to be described; thence north 4500'00" east, contin-
uing along last described course, a distance of 419.00
feet, and there terminating.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on February 17, 1981, as
required by law, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that good area planning requires
that this easement be vacated and that it would be in the public interest
to do so. .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council
as follows:
1. Said right-of-way as above described is hereby vacated.
2. A certified copy of this resolution shall be prepared
by the City Clerk and shall be a notice of completion of the
proceedings and shall be recorded in accordance with the
provisions of M.S.A. 117.19.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
ATTEST:,
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Fee-Police Dept.
Office supplies
Equipment repair & parts
Postage
Wine
Wine
Wine
Liquor
Liquor
Wine
Wine
Supplies-Liquor Store
Liquor
4th Quarter 1980 Building Permit
Registration of motor vehicle
Rent-Liquor Store
Registration-Community Service
Fee-Engineering Dept.
Wine
Wine
Liquor
Wine
Liquor
Wine
Book-Park Dept.
Payroll
Payroll
Payroll
Dues
Payroll
Insurance
Insurance
Insurance
Insurance
Insurance
Insurance
1 476.00'
75.35
243.30
195.00
(9,750.3:
60.00
271.86
593.00
431.01
239.6E
215.0:
121.75
654.61
1,146.19
343.22
666.81
84.80
1,555.5:
9,750.37
10.08
2,058.50
15.08
15.00
468.88
995.51
2,035.1
667.5C
1,390.8:
38.50
14,622.00
165.00
52.96
324.00
10,065.07
1,156.37
131.50
1,474.1C
588.68
6,556.51 •
434.64
Calculator-Finance Dept.. 50.00
First aid equipment-Fire Dept. 734.11
Mouthpiece for testing DW1's-Police Dept. 49.78
Freight charges-Water Dept. 34.81
Equipment repair & parts 167.38 !
Decals-Water Dept. 84.80 i
Reflectors, street signs 527.80 !
February 17, 1981
STATE OF MINNESOTA
'Y OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CUuNTY OF HENNEPIN
The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows:
5045 VOID OUT CHECK
5053 VOID OUT CHECK
5113 VOID OUT CHECK
5119 VOID OUT CHECK
5131 VOID OUT CHECK
5164 NATIONAL REGISTRY OF EMERGENCY
5165 GREAT WESTERN SCHOOL SUPPLIES
5166 WESTONKA AUTO BODY
5167 HOPKINS POSTMASTER
5168 TWIN CITY WINE CO
5169 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO.
5170 CAPITAL CITY DISTRIBUTING
5171 OLD PEORIA COMPANY
5172 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
5173 MIDWEST WINE CO.
• 5174 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO.
5175 BUTCH'S BAR SUPPLY
• 5176 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC.
5177 VOID OUT CHECK
STATE TREASURER
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
5180 PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL ASSOCIATES
5181 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY
5182 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
5183 TWIN CITY WINE CO.
5184 OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC.
5185 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO.
5186 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO.
5187 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC.
5188 JOHNSON WINE CO.
5189 NATIONAL GOLF FOUNDATION
5190 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
5191 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE & ANNUITY
5192 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS
5193 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING
5194 PERA
5195 GROUP HEALTH PLAN
5196 HMO SERVICES
5197 HMO SERVICES
5198 BLUE CROSS INSURANCE
5199 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN
5200 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE
5201 VOID OUT CHECK
5202 ACRO-MINNESOTA, INC.
C ADVANCE AMBULANCE & EQUIPMENT
IL.04 ALCOHOL COUNTERMEASURE SYSTEM
5205 ALLIED CARRIERS EXCHANGE, INC.
5206 AMERICAN MARINE & ENGINE WORKS
5207 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC.
5208 EARL F. ANDERSEN & ASSOC.
499
February 17, 1981
Page two
't 9 RON ANDERSON
5210 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT CO., INC.
5211 DEBBIE ATKINSON
5212 BLOOMINGTON OFFICIALS ASSOC.
5213 LAWRENCE BRANSTETTER
5214 BRAUER & ASSOCIATES LTD. INC.
5215 BROWN PHOTO
5216 MARY BETH BUCKMAN
5217 STEVE CALHOON
5218 CHANHASSEN AUTO PARTS
521R COLUMBIA TRANSIT CORP.
5220 COPY EQUIPMENT INC.
5221 COUNTRYSIDE INVESTMENTS CO.
5222 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CO.
5223 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY
5224 DALCO
5225 DASCO INC.
5226 DECATUR ELECTRONICS, INC.
5227 DORHOLT PRINTING & STATIONERY
5228 EDEN PRAIRIE GROCERY
5229 EDEN PRAIRIE SANITATION CO.
5230 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT
5231 CITY OF EDINA
5232 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY, INC.
113
EMPIRE-CROWN/AUTO, INC.
ESB BRANDS, INC.
5235 AFTON ALPS
5236 SNOCREST/BIRCH PARK
5237 CHRIS rACTOR
5238 FIRE INSTURCTORS ASSN. OF MINN.
5239 FIRE SAFETY & COMUNICATIONS
5240 FLYING CLOUD OIL CO.
5241 PAUL FOSS PRINTING
5242 FOX, mccg & MURPHY
5243 FRONTIER LUMBER & HARDWARE
5244 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC.
5245 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
5246 JUNE GILBERT
5247 GLOBAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY
5248 GRAHAM PAPER
5249 GROSS INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
5250 GUNNAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC.
5251 VI HAAN
5252 HARMON GLASS
5253 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT CO.
5254 HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIRECTOR
5255 HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIRECTOR
5256 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL CENTERS ( 37 HI-Fl SOUND ELECTRONICS
5258 HONEYWELL INC. COMMERICIAL
5259 HOPKINS DODGE SALES, INC.
Equipment repair-Police Dept.
Starter-Equipment Maintenance
Refund-Rec Dept.
Basketball officials-Rec Dept.
Service-Sewer Dept.
Service-Purgatory Creek
Supplies-Police Dept.
Service-Happenings brochure
Mileage
Equipment repair & parts
Charter bus-Rec Dept.
Office supplies-Engineering Dept.
Refund-Over-assessment
Desk signs, stamps-Police & City Hall
Quicklime-Water Dept.
No slip carpet-Fire Dept.
Flashlight batteries-Fire Dept.
Repair radar-Police Dept.
Office supplies
Supplies-Police Dept.
Service
Service-January 1981
Tests
First aid kit-Community Service
Chrome polish-Public Safety
Batteries-Street Dept.
Ski trip-Rec Dept.
Ski trip-Rec Dept.
Refund-Rec Dept.
Fire training manual
Strobe lights, flags-Water Dept.
Fuel-Historical Culture
Decals for licenses
Audit
Lumber-Park Dept, paint & supplies-Water
Dept.
Equipment repair & parts
Equipment-Engineering Dept. & Park Dept.
Refund-Rec Dept.
Utility trailer-Water Dept.
Xerox paper-City Hall
Service
Install flood lights-Fire Dept.
Refund-Rec Dept.
Windshield-Police Dept.
Air compressor-Water Dept.
Service-Tree debris removal
Welding gas
Tuition-Emergency Med. Tech training
Amplifier, projector-P.A. System for
Fire Dept.
Air compressor-Water Dept.
Equipment repair & parts
45.00
58.45
8.00
1,188.00
76.95
300.00
18.75
697.08
11.40
674.20
145.60
345.14
2,009.47
275.00
2,845.32
731.32
99.84
82.98
221.56
8.74
60.50
918.45
85.00
73.00
66.96
173.67
88.00
.234.00
12.00
76.00
338.78
472.27
119. 00
437.41
366.59
408.00
24.00
419.18
595.35
70.04
1,956.72
12.66
222.97
• 26.45
397.50
24.59
110.0
1,050.42
371.50
73.78
SOO
February 17, 1981
Page three
LO HOPKINS PARTS CO.
5261 IMPERIAL, INC.
5262 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES
5263 • J & R RADIATOR CORP.
5264 CARL JULLIE
5265 KARULF HARDWARE INC.
5266 KELLY SERVICES, INC.
5267 NANCY KODADEK
5268 KRAEMER'S HOME CENTER
5269 KRAEMER'S HOME CENTER
5270 LEEF BROTHERS INC.
5271 LOGIS
5272 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR
5273 ROBERT N. MARTZ
5274 MEDOX
5275 METRO FONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
5276 METROPOLITAN ASSOC. OF PARKS
METROPOLITAN FIRE EQUIPMENT CO.
METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL CONTRACT.
5279 MID-CENTRAL FIRE INC.
5280 MIDLAND EQUIPMENT CO.
5281 MRPA-TOURNAMENT FEE
5282 MIKE'S EDEN PRAIRIE FLORAL
5283 MILLER/DAVIS COMPANY
5284 MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE
5285 MINNESOTA AMERICAN INSTITUTE
5286 MINNESOTA FIRE INC.
5287 MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY
5288 MINNESOTA TORO, INC.
5289 MODERN TIRE CO.
5290 MUNICIPAL & PRIVATE SERVICES, INC.
5291 STATE TREASURER
5292 KATHY NELSON
5293 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO.
5294 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE
5295 PARK AUTO UPHOLSTERY
5296 W.G. PEARSON, INC.
5297 PETTY CASH-PUBLIC SAFETY
5298 POWER BRAKE EQUIPMENT CO.
5299 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN
5300 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING, INC.
5301 QUALITY WOOD PRODUCTS
("02 RICK RABENORT
RAPID COPY, INCORPORATED
5304 RIDGE DOOR SALES COMPANY OF MINN.
5305 RIDGE SQUARE SPORTS
Equipment repair & parts 160.08
Drill bits-Water Dept. 23.58
Typewriter-Police Dept. 931.50
Equipment repair & parts 21.00
Dues 125.75
Padlocks, keys, paint, batteries, side 603.53
cutters, can opener, screwdriver, floating
lanterns-Public Safety, nails, rivets,
tool box, chain, saw blades, paint-Street
Dept., scraper, varnish, hinge, cleaner, oil,
bulbs-Park Dept., hoes, garbage cans, paint
trays, rollers, brushes, car wax-Water Dept.
Temporary help-Finance Dept. 437.10
Supplies-Adaptive Recreation 28.51
Plumbing pipes, faucet, rope-Fire Dept. 741.09
Rivets, hose, lights 247.87
Service 148.14
Service-December 1980 2,889.53
Equipment repair & parts 8.00
Expenses 103.25
Oxygen 16.12
Rental-Paging System 21.74
Dues-Park Dept. 10.00
Oxygen-Fire Dept. 128.65
Installed air separator-Water Dept. 1,267.87
Fire boots & pants 2,074.00
Equipment repair • 52.0:
Basketball tournament-Rec Dept. 60.00
Services 40.82
Legal forms-Assessing Dept. 28.00
Employment ads 136.50
Fire Code book 83.7E
Breathing tanks, poles-Fire Dept. 1,624.63
Service 436.85
Supplies-Rec Dept. 8.43
Equipment repair & parts 275.4?
January 1981 Service 1,114.5 ,J
Fee-Round Lake & Riley Lake Park 30.00
Refund-Rec Dept. 4.50
Service 1,113.73
Service 2,431.3C
Equipment repair 105.00
Sand-Park Dept. 448.05
Expenses 9.99
Gear & Shaft-Street Dept. 19.82
Snowblower belt-Park Dept. 13.12
Daily log sheets-Police Dept. 301.20
Supplies-Engineering Dept. 27.50
Expenses 7.00
Liquor ID cards 52.65
Electronic door openers-Fire Dept. 689.40
Basketball scorebooks-Rec Dept. 5.90
so/ •
February 17, 1981
Pane four
(
5306 R1EKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC. Service-Ind. Road Utilities, High Trails 19,736.06
Swr & Wtr., Valley View Road, Shady Oak
Ind. Park, 70th Street Improvement, Cardinal
Creek Estates, Rymarland Camp, Lake Idlewild
Drainage
5307 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CO. Equipment rental 2,250.00
5308 BEV RODBERG Refund-Rec Dept. 4.50
5309 ROOT-O-MATIC SEWER SERVICE Service-168th & Duck Lake 154.00
5310 ROSEDALE CHEV 2 new trucks-Community Service & Bldg. 15,796.24
Dept.
5311 TODD SALMON Refund-Rec Dept. 3.50
5312 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES INC. Portable Restrooms-Park Dept. 715.00
5313 SUZANNE SCHULZ Mileage 10.64
5314 SCOTTS' WAYZATA APPLIANCES Equipment repair-Park Dept. 24.95
5315 SEARS Saw blades-Park Dept. 29.99
5316 W.E. NEAL SLATE CO. Equipment-Fire Dept. 427.00
5317 SMILEY GLOTTER ASSOCIATES Service-Eden Prairie Community Center 5,999.45
5318 SPECIALTY SCREENING Lettering & door decals 68.97
5319 SPRAYCO INC. Spray gun-Street Dept. 125.00
5320 STATE TREASURER Rental-Sewer Dept. 2.00
5321 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 2 New Police Vehicles 18,812.00
5322 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CO. Alternators for new vehicles 400.00
5323 SULLI VANS SERVICES, INC. Service-City Hall 75.00
1:] TYPE HOUSE+DURAGRAPH
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS mm Construction paper-Counity Service
Paper-Community Service
. 14.73
5.50
5326 BOB TYSON Expenses 46.59
5327 UNITED LABORATORIES Disinfectant deodorant-Water Dept. 230.10
5328 VAUGHN'S Flags-Water Dept. 136.00
5329 VICTORY ENVELOPE INC. Envelopes 203.23
5330 JOHN VOSSEN Refund-Rec Dept. 9.50
5331 WARNING LITES, INC. Warning sighs 21.70
5332 WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY Gasket & valve box-Water Dept. 169.42
5333 SANDRA F. WERTS Office supplies 4.67
5334 WEST SUBURBAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Expenses 10.00
5335 XEROX CORPORATION Service 1,265.22
5336 YOUNG AUDIENCES, INC. Young audience concert 130.00
5337 YOUND AUDIENCES, INC. Concert-Historical Cultural Commission 65.00
5338 ROSE ZACHMAN Refund-Rec Dept. 4.50
5339 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY Cleaning supplies-Street Dept. 39.05
5340 ZIEBART AUTO TRUCK RUSTPROOFING Undercoating new vehicle 151.00
5341 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION Dues-Planning Dept. 70.00
5342 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC. Dues-Public Works 145.00
5343 AWARDS, INC. Trophies-Rec Dept. 204.39
5344 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING Service-Cardinal Creek, Round Lake 2,102.8
5345 CASE POWER & EQUIPMENT Loader-Park Dept. 8,500.00
5346 COMMUNITY DANCE CENTER Instructor-Rec Dept. 1,098.00
5347 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO. Water meters . 10,577.70
5348 NODLAND ASSOCIATES, INC. Service-Chatham Wood Addition 32,757.90
cs590
CARRIE TIETZ Minutes-Park & Recreation 64.12 SANDRA WERTS Refund-Ski Trip 39.00
5351 BEER WHOLESALERS INC. Beer 2,322.68
5352 COCA-COLA BOTTLING MIDWEST INC. Mixes 166.10
502-
SO3
February 17, 1981
Fre five
5353 . DAY DISTRIBUTING CO.
5354 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO.
• 5355 .LEDING DISTRIBUTING
5356 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO.
5357 ROUILLARD BEVERAGE CO., INC.
5358 THORPE DISTRIBUTING
5359 HENNEPIN EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS
Beer
Beer
Beer
Mixes
Beer.
Beer
Dues-Police Dept.
1,515.85
2,785.85
1,989.20
167.20
942.31
2,775.05
1,160.00
TOTAL $225,918.91
IMO:
TO: Mayor E. City Council
FROM: Walter D. Johnson VT-
THRU: John Frane, Acting City Manager
REGARDING: Ord. No. 81-05
DATE: February 13, 1981
Attached hereto is a proposed Ordinance No. 81-05, this proposal amends
Section 1 of Ordinance No. 248.
Approximately every three years, the various "codes" are updated and/or
slightley changed. When this happens, then the Edition year reference is
changed. Ammended Section 1 of Ord. No. 248 refers to the new Edition
year that is adopted by the State of Minnesota and by the City of Eden
Prairie by reference.
End Of Memo.
50q
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 81-05
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE NO. 248
AND RELATING TO ESTABLISHING BUILDING CODES
The Council of the City of Eden Prairie hereby ordains:
Section 1. Section 1 of Ordinance No. 248 is amended by deleteing and adding
the following paragraph:
Section 1. Building Code - That a certain document, three
copies of which are on file in the office of the Building
Inspection Department of the City of Eden Prairie, being
marked and designated as Uniform Building Code 1979 Edition
including chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, and all appendices; The Minne-
sota State Building Code Amendments 1980 Edition; The Nat-
ional Electrical Code 1981 Edition; the National Elevator,
Dumbwaiters, Escalators and Moving Walks Code 1978 Edition
with 1979 supplement; The Minnesota Plumbing Code 1976 Edition
with amendments, The Minnesota Heating, Ventilating, Air
Conditioning and Refrigeration Code; The Minnesota State Fire
Marshalls Code for the handicapped as amended and the Uniform
Fire Code 1973 Edition; be and the sane as hereby adopted as
the building code of the City of Eden Prairie for regulating
the erection, construction, enlargement, alteration, repair,
moving, removal, demolition, conversion, occupancy, equipment,
use height, area and maintenance of all building or structures
in the City of Eden Prairie; providing for the issuance of
permits and collection of fees as provided herein; providing
penalties for any violation of such code; declaring and estab-
lishing fire zones; and each and all of the regulations, pro-
visions, penalties, conditions and terms of such documents,
are hereby referred to, adopted and made part hereof as if
fully set out in this ordinance.
First read at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Eden Prairie
this 17th day of February, 1981 and finally read, adopted and ordered published
at a regular meeting of the Council of said City on the day of
1981.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, Clerk
To: Mayor and Council
From: John Frane
Date: 2-12-81
Re: Final approval MIDB's - Richard Cohen/Minnesota Industrial Tool - $970,000
Briggs and Morgan acting as bond counsel for Mr. Cohen has asked that the
Council be made aware of two matters concerning this project.
When Mr. Cohen appeared before the Council with his request for preliminary
approval he stated that a partnership of Mr. Portuoy and himself, as a 90%+
partner, would own the project. Mr. Cohen will be the 100% owner of the
project.
The final resolution, which is in the mayor's signature file, in paragraph
1-2 (9) requests a finding that no public official of the City has a direct
or indirect interest in the project. Briggs and Morgan ask if any Council
member has or knows of such interest that they so state it. I do not know
of any public official having such interest.
The final documents have been approved by the City Attorney.
Mayor and City Council
Walter D. Johnson IN:Y7-
John Frane, Acting City Manager
REGARDING: Ordering connection to city sewers at 15500 North Eden Dr.
DATE: February 13, 1981
On January 28th of this year, I received a phone call from a resident
on West 62nd St, in regard to his neighbors "on site septic system"
leaching to the surface.
I visited with Mrs. Pendleton at 15500 North Eden Drive, that afternoon
and informed her that they will be required to connect to the city sani-
tary sewer main, which is in North Eden Drive, and that she should get
back to me after discussing it with her husband. I heard nothing, so on
February 3rd, 1981; I sent them a certified letter informing them that
1.hey shall connect to the sanitary sewer main within 10 days as outlined
in Section 9 of Ord. No. 157.
Mr. Pendleton contacted me by phone the next day, he related to me that
he was unable to make the connection at this time, because of financial
problems.
Section 11 of Ord. No. 157, allows for the city to order the work done
and assess the costs against the ;Property benefited. I did not check into
his ability to pay, but recommend this solution to correct a bad situation.
As it exists now its a very unhealthly condition, to the homeowner, to
residences in the area, to children playing in the area and to neighbor-
hood dogs rolling and walking in it and then carring the pathogens into
the homes.
I took the liberty to obtain estimates for this work from two local in-
stallers. They both would beable to start installation almost immediately.
Copies of there estimates are attached hereto.
End of Memo.
KE140:
TO:
FROM:
THRU:
6.o(-
Pig. No, 01 Pages
40 aLlItl&ISICS4
LANCE COPPIN'S
SEWER & WATER SERVICE, INC.
2720 Shannon Lane
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
Lance at 472-2316
11111weamosesailiMAINt
OTWO 10 ,
1n011D
SUSS
1 3,
OAT
Sc\S'o .t.)-e ,r, vcc(tc\e_ cv61. a a vk
2t-eN\c‘e. D'N
OM s OF MANS
P NAME ANO1 OM
e_N, S\tA-0 ,1 c11.14 Q851 . ANCISTICT .
JOS 1.01,1t
We hereby cubed spaohcabons and estimates. sulgoct to all terms and conditions as set forth on both NM, as follows
\AO 0 Ito S e kok tit. A..: LI evi NV.Ar LA%
\'
th,r0 Lk" V,0. i.,...St..
C \--vN% n.... .n \-4..le n••t-o l...) t A ‘) \;..
Oh" te a AL. c os se t:cCe ,e 3t \cc..\n
..0 ..c..\\
Q r.o..e do C.S. tr..NN teb.
5 cA L. 0 r
nAm)ccr
(Itsad Reverse &dal
- --
nit littlpage hereby to furnish material and Ikon — complete in assonance with above specifications,
dollars (5 O) ton the sum of .
Note: This proposal may be withdrawn by us If
,
Authorised
days. Signature not accorded within
A rrtpird: The above prises. spacificabom and
conditions are satisfactory and are hereby ucemint You s ignature.
authorised to do the work an specified Panhent
will be wad.., outlined abr.*.
&Nature Date
SWEDLUND SEWER .81 WATER CO.
SEWER AND WATER • COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL
WOO ?MIR HILL ROAD
1114WWTONKA, MINNeSOTA
LICENSED • BONDED • INSURED
nom: ex34e9e. 9,re-61,9fe
QUOTATION
[ Sum
Ott fidek)
ph. 13 7' 7? 4 Z
Job Addreu /..5.5-d_e_e_ki.
We Pretty Propose to furnish aft the materials and 1.111011/1 all the lebor necessary for the completion of:
YES", NO
PERMITS
tir 0 ze CAST IRON PIPE
SEPTIC TANK
0 evgllir PLASTIC PIPE Llir 0
WATER METER
0 ,..„.... COPPER WATER LINE 0 I
• GATE VALV3 ar 0 PLASTIC WATER LINE 0
1
. i
74 62171/—kr44..a.a-P--ae.—.---.2-.-04.r
earl Tee' 4. refe .44t.1 Av /0 et, ! i
1
1
TOTAL S /14.4-a.
$ .
EXTRAS IA) •
I131 $
IC) . $
ID) $
GRAND TOTAL S
TERMS OF CONTRACT: 1 I (LIEN WAIVER FURNISHED UPON PAYMENTI
Any alteration or deviation from the above proposal incoming extra costs, will he executed only upon written orders, and will become
an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Liability
Insurance on the above work in the amount of $30000 and Workmens Compensation Insurance is carried by Swedlund Sewer & Water
CO.
This Proposal does not include any village or city service or access charges that must be paid for prior to Me issuing of permits. This
proposal does not include unusual underground hazards, such as buried debris. boulders, stumps, underground Sprinkler systems, gas
fines, electric lines, telephone lines, highwater table Of any other unusual underground condition Sur face restoration, replacing of sod,
finish grading, the removal Irons or bring.% to the job site of soil, etc. are not included in this proposal.
We cannot be responsible for damage to ttttt or shrubs, but will make every effort lo protect them.
111 1111111 1111111:11
111117111111111
ea°
Note-This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within 30 days.
S A P APProximate starting date
Respe?Jytted by Sued nd Sesser & Water
Per Z/14.eae4(
JEFF SWEDLUND '
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL
The above prices, specifications, and condiflons are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the moot at
specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
Accepted by: Data .
Please return signed while copy to Swedlund Sewer & Water Co.
606e •
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
REGARDING:
DATE:
Planning Commission, Mayor and City Council
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
John Frane, Acting City Manager
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ACTION ON EDEN PRAIRIE'S
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN
February 12, 1981
After more than one year of delay, the Metropolitan Council, acting
upon recommendations of their Physical Development Committee, adopted
Eden Prairie's Guide Plan on January 22, 1981. Included with this
memo is their Resolution 81-15, and the letter from Charles Weaver,
Chairman, containing a summary of the changes required in our plan.
These changes are divided into two catagories; mandatory plan changes and
dhanges that would be required for our plan to be in conformance with theirs. The
distinction is made because of what Metro Council is allowed to mandate
under the State Planning Act.
Mr. Lambert has a separate memo explaining the procedure if we take
exception to the designation of Lake Riley Park as a regional rather
than a community park.
I have distributed the letter and other pertinent information to:
Carl Jullie (Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan and Public Utilities
Capital Improvement Plan), John Frane (Investment Framework), Walter
Johnson (Water Quality Management Plan for on-site systems), and Bob
Lambert (Lake Riley Mandatory Plan Change and Regional Trails Policy
Plan Amendment).
I have reviewed the sections on the airport and feel that we can reference
items 4b. and 5a. Under 4a, of course, Flying Cloud should be classified
a "minor airport" and under 5b, we will evaluate land use under the
1-10-65 contour but do not anticipate making any recommendations for
change. Items El, 2, 3, 4, & 5, can and will be addressed at the Council's
direction.
Our preliminary look at these areas of conflict indicates that we should
be able to comply with Metro Council recommendations within the nine
months prescribed, and with the exception of the Lake Riley problem, do
not expect to request an appeal by March 23, 1981.
Staff will be present Tuesday evening to respond to additional questions you
may have regarding this review.
CE:ss
517
Adopted this 22nd day of January , 1981.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
By lay )/ 61 0-41
Charlei R. Weaver,/
Chairman
By L
Ex94Uii;e *Secretary
5'08
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Suite 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
RESOLUTION NO. 81-15 '
RESOLUTION ADOPTING COUNCIL FINDINGS FOR REVIEW OF THE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council is authorized, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 473.145, to prepare and adopt a
comprehensive development guide for the Metropolitan Area
and the Council has adopted such a development guide; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council is authorized, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.175 and 473.851 through
473.866, the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, to review the
comprehensive plans of local govenmental units to determine
their compatibility with each other, conformity with metro-
politan system plans, and apparent consistency with the
adopted chapters of the Metropolitan Development Guide; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie submitted its comprehensive plan to
the Metropolitan Council for review pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 473.175; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has studied and reviewed the
Eden Prairie Comprehensive Plan and has determined whether
the Plan is in conformity with the metropolitan system
plans, compatible with local comprehensive plans and school
capital improvement programs, and apparently consistent with
other adopted chapters of the Metropolitan Development Guide.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
THAT the Metropolitan Council adopt the attached Eden Prairie
Comprehensive Plan review report, Referral Report No. 81-16, and
the recommendations found on the cover page and at pages 24-28 of
the report as its review of the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Plan
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.175.
February 9, 1981
Chris Enger
Director of Planning
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
RE: City of Eden Prairie .
Comprehensive Plan Review
Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 7765-2
300 Metro Square Building
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
Telephone 612/291-6359
:Dear Mr. Enger:
At its meeting on February 22, 1981, the Metropolitan Council
'considered the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Plan. This consideration
was based on a report of the Physical Development Committee,
Referral Report No. 16. A copy of this report, which was adopted as
presented, is attached.
The Council adopted Resolution No. 81-15 which provides for adoption
of this report and the recommendations contained on pages 25-28 of
the report. These recommendations are as follows:
That the City of Eden Prairie be advised that:
A. This report constitutes the Council's official review
required under the Metropolitan Land Planning Act.
B. The following plan modification regarding recreation
open space is required as authorized in Minnesota
Statutes Section 473.175, Subd. 1:
1. Riley Lake park must be classified as a regional
park, and references to the total acreage of the
park must be corrected to 204 acres.
C. The Eden Prairie plan conforms to metropolitan system
plans as follows:
1. The Eden prairie plan is in conformity with the
Transportation Policy Plan.
609
An Agency Crested to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Comprising:
Anoka County 0 Carver County 0 Dakota County 0 Hennepin County 0 Ramsey County 0 Scott County 0 Washington County
Chris Enger
Director of Planning
City of Eden Prairie
February 9, 1981
Page Two
tlyns crt 1:6;
300 Metro Square Building
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
Telephone 012/291-6350
2. Eden Prairie's plan is in conformity with the
metropolitan system plan for sanitary sewers as it
existed on January 1, 1978, but it is not in
conformity with the Metropolitan Water Quality
Management Policy Plan subsequently adopted in
March 1979.
a. Until a complete local sewer policy plan is
adopted in accordance with Policy 30 and
Procedure 10 of the Water Quality Management
Policy Plan, the Council will not consider
Eden Prairie's comprehensive sewer policy plan
to be in conformity with metropolitan system
plans for sanitary sewers.
b. Eden Prairie should address all of the content
requirements established by Policy 30 and
Procedure 10 of the Water Quality Management
Policy Plan in the preparation of its
comprehensive sewer policy plan.
c. Eden prairie should adopt the recommended
on-site system management techniques in
accordance with the guidelines contained in
Procedure 10 and Policies 44c and d in the
Water Quality Management Policy Plan.
3. The following amendment, in addition to the
required modification above, is needed to bring
the plan into complete conformity with the
Recreation Open Space System Plan:
a. The plan should be amended under the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes 473.856 to
include linear parks and potential regional
trails as shodn in the Regional Trails Policy
Plan Amendment (November 1978) and revised
Regional Recreation Open Space Policy Plan
(November 1980).
An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Comprising:
Anoka County 0 Carter County 0 Dakota County 0 llennepia County 0 Damian, County 0 Scott County a Washington County
Chris Enger
Director of Planning
City of Eden Prairie
February 9, 1981
Page Three 300 Metro Square Building
, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 '
Telephone 612/291-6359
4. The Eden Prairie Comprehensive Plan will not be in
conformity with the Metropolitan System Plan for
Aviation until the following recommendations are
met:
a. The Eden Prairie Comprehensive Plan should
classify Flying Cloud Airport as a "minor"
airport.
b. The plan should be revised to reflect the
recodified Aeronautics rules and regulations
and make specific reference to those
regulations identified in this report.
5. Eden Prairie should consider the following airport •
system recommendations:
a. The airspace and land use safety zoning maps
and ordinances developed by the Joint Airport
Zoning Board should be incorporated into local
codes.
b. The city and MAC should undertake field
measurement for aircraft noise in those
undeveloped portions of the community within
the MUSA line that have been projected to be
within the L 65 contour. In undeveloped
areas that are determined to have aircraft
noise impacts, the city should evaluate the
potential for development of the parcels with
land uses that are not noise-sensitive.
D. The plan appears to be compatible with plans of
adjacent and affected units of government. Several
comments have been submitted which can be worked out
by Eden Prairie and the parties involved. The
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has commented on
the plants lack of information regarding sewers, which
is needed to satisfy the content requirements for a
comprehensive sewer plan.
. 6 1 1 — .
An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Comprising:
Anoka County 0 Carver County 0 Dakota County c Hennepin County ()Ramsey County 0 Scott County 0 Witabin 1gton County ,
Chris Enger
Director of Planning
City of Eden Prairie
February 9, 1981
Page Four 300 Metro Square Building
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
Telephone 612/291-6359
ktif
r
4• -
C11 "
E. The plan is consistent with other Metropolitan
Development Guide chapters as follows:
1. The plan is not consistent with Council forecasts
for households and employment. Eden Prairie
should reconsider its growth assumptions in light
of the information provided in this review, and where more current figures are available, they
should be used. The Eden Prairie plan contains
forecast assumptions which are above those of the
Council. There is little documentation to justify
these forecasts, and they do not appear to be
reasonable when considered in a regional context.
Such growth would not, however, be inconsistent
with the Development Framework provided there is
adequate regional service capacity to support such
growth. Such a determination cannot, however, be
made until all of the comprrehensive plans have
been reviewed.
2. The realignment of the Metropolitan Urban Service
Area (MUSA) is consistent with the Development
Framework. However, the amount of land provided
for 1990 urbanization is not consistent with
Council estimates. The plan should be revised to
include timing and staging of local urbanization
areas within the MUSA, so that the amount of land
available for development by 1990 is in scale with
Council growth forecasts and land supply
estimates.
3. The rural area density proposed by Eden Prairie is
not consistent with the Development Framework. In order to preserve the rural character of the Rural
Service Area and prevent the need for urban
services, the city should consider adopting a
density of one dwelling unit per 10 acres. It
appears unlikely that the five-acre minimum lot size proposed by the city can achieve the purposes
of the Council' s Rural Service Area, and it may
frustrate Eden Prairie's objectives for balanced
growth, including channeling growth into the urban area and efficient, economical provision of municipal services. „I n
An Agency CreAted to Coordinate the Planning and Develo
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
T
w
i
n
C
i
t
i
e
s
M
e
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n
A
r
e
a
C
o
m
p
r
i
s
i
n
g
:
Anoka County 0 Corner County 0 Dakota County 0 Hennepin Cou
n
t
y
0
R
a
m
s
e
y
C
o
u
n
t
y
0
S
c
o
t
t
C
o
u
n
t
y
0
i
'
V
e
o
.
l
t
i
n
g
t
e
n
C
o
u
n
t
y
W A A W_47
v hvm 01/"4;
300 Metro Square Building
Saint Paul, Minnesota 551W
Telephone 612/291-6359
_
4. Despite several shortcomings, the housing portion
of the plan is consistent with the Housing chapter
of the Metropolitan Development Guide. The
following is recommended:
a. Eden Prairie has indicated its intention of
revising the housing section of its
comprehensive plan following formal review of
the entire plan by the Metropolitan Council.
As the city begins this formal revision, it
should consider the use of an organizational
format which consolidates most of its housing
element into one section of the plan.
b. A revised housing plan should examine the most
current data available in its inventory
andanalysiS, and should contain housing growth
projections agreed upon by both Eden Prairie
and the Council. It should also consider
extensive additions and much greater
specificity in its housing policies and
implementation strategies regarding the
provision of low- and moderate-income and
modest-cost housing opportunities, as well as
housing maintenance and rehabilitation
concerns.
5. The plan is consistent with the Protection Open
Space and Water Resources chapters of the
Metropolitan Development Guide and Council
policies for stormwater management. However, the
city should add policies on mineral extraction,
groundwater and soil resources. The city should
also clarify and expand its implementation program
for natural resources, notably stormwater.
6. The plan is consistent with the Investment
Framework except that the following information
should be added to the capital improvement program
(CIP). At such time as the city amends its CIP,
it should forward the amended version to the
Council.
I 3
An Agency Created to Coordinate the PInnning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Arcs Comprising:
Anoka County 0 Carver County C Dakota County 0 Hennepin County 0 Ramgey County 0 Scott County oWashington County
•
Chris Enger
Director of Planning
City of Eden Prairie
February 9, 1981
Page Five
2Wris csTI*
300 Metro Square Building
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
Telephone 612/291-6359
_ - - -- --
a. The city should include all proposed projects
through the year 1985, and an estimate of the
financial impact that each project will have
on the city's finances.
b. The city should provide information on its
outstanding indebtedness and debt service
payments so that the information can be used
as a part of the coordinated financial
planning of other units of government.
7. Eden Prairie's plan should address the planning
requirements of MSA 473.811, Subd. 5, which calls
for a municipal ordinance governing the collection
and disposal of solid waste within the city.
Appropriate city ordinance provisions should be
described or reference should be made to an
applicable county ordinance which is or will be
adopted by the city.
Under the Land Planning Act, Eden Prairie has 60 days to appeal the
modification being required by the Metropolitan Council in its
review of the City's Plan. The deadline for such an appeal is March
23, 1981. If Eden Prairie does not appeal the modification, the law
requires the adoption of the Plan, with required modification,
An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Citips Metropolitan Area C011) prising:
Anoka County C Carver CCUTI ty 3 D:Jlota County 0 Itonnerin County 0 Ramsey County 0 Scott County 3 Washington County
Chris Enger
Director of Planning
City of Eden Prairie
February 9, 1981
Page Six
Chris Enger
Director of Planning
City of Eden Prairie
February 9, 1981
Page Seven 300 Metro Square Building
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
Telephone 612/291-0359
•
within nine months of the completion of the Metropolitan Council's
review. The Council should be formally advised when the Plan is
adopted. If there are substantial changes made in the Plan before
adoption, please note these when you notify the Council of the
Plan's adoption.
Sincerely,
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Charles R. Weaver, Chairman
CRW:emp
Attachnent
cc: Affected School Districts
. Adjacent Communities
Hennepin, Carver and Scott Counties
Ray Odde, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
Barbara Senness, Metropolitan Council Staff
516-
An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of thelswin Cities Metropolitan Area COMPriMing:
Anoka Coon ty c Carver County 0 Dakota County C lien nepi n County 0 Ramsey County 0 Scott County o WAshington Coma ty
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE: February 11, 1981
SUBJECT: Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Review of Eden Prairie
Guide Plan
Enclosed in the packet for the February 17 meeting is a copy of the
February 9, 1981 letter to Chris Eager, Director of Plannin
g
for
the City of Eden Prairie, from Charles R. Weaver, Chairman of the
Metropolitan Council, referring to the Metropolitan Council
r
e
v
i
e
w
of the Eden Prairie Guide Plan.
. Mr. Enger will provide a report regarding the Metropolit
a
n
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
requests for changes to the Guide Plan in the areas of tran
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
sewer, the airport, the MUSA Line and the housing plan. Th
i
s
r
e
p
o
r
t
refers to the required plan modification as authorized in M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
Statutes Section 4737.175, Subdivision 1 "Riley Lake Park
m
u
s
t
b
e
classified as a regional park, and references to the total
a
c
r
e
a
g
e
of the park must be corrected to 204 acres."
Under the Land Planning Act, Eden Prairie has 60 days to a
p
p
e
a
l
t
h
e
modification being required by the Metropolitan Council in
i
t
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
of the Guide Plan. The deadline for this appeal is March
2
3
,
1
9
8
1
.
If Eden Prairie does not appeal this modification, the law
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
the adoption of the plan with required modification within
n
i
n
e
m
o
n
t
h
s
of the completion of the Metropolitan Councils review.
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission re
v
i
e
w
e
d
t
h
i
s
directive at their February 3, 1981 meeting. There was co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
b
l
e
discussion regarding the January 28, 1981 staff report, a
n
d
f
i
n
a
l
l
y
a
motion was considered to approve the recommendation by th
e
s
t
a
f
f
r
e
p
o
r
t
requesting the City Council to forward an amendment to the
M
e
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n
Council requesting a change in the status of Riley Lake Par
k
f
r
o
m
a
regional park to a community park. The vote on that motion was 3
i
n
favor, 3 opposed, 1 abstention. After additional discussio
n
,
t
h
e
r
e
w
a
s
another motion proposed to recommend the City Council appro
v
e
R
i
l
e
y
L
a
k
e
Park as a regional park. The vote on this motion was 3 in
f
a
v
o
r
,
3 opposed.
1 abstention.
City staff requests authorization from the City Council to begin proce
e
d
i
n
g
s
to appeal the modification being required by the Metropolit
a
n
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
regarding the classification of Riley Lake Park. A resolut
i
o
n
a
n
d
a
l
e
t
t
e
r
stating the rationale for the request should be forwarded to Mr. Weaver prior
to March 23, 1931.
Mayor and City Council
John D. Frane, Acting City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services .--at-
BL:md
MEMORANDUM
• TO:
FAOM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
.Janaury 28, 1981
Metropolitan Council Review of Guide Plan
In 1979, the City completed the updating of the Guide Plan and submitted the
plan for review and approval by the Metropolitan Council. Recently, the City
received a report from one of the Metropolitan Council staff planhers regarding
the review of the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Plan. The 29 page document indicated
shortcomings in the Eden Prairie Guide Plan. Many of the conflicts pointed out
by the Metropolitan Council staff were in the area of challenging the City
estimates on growth forcasts, staging of urbanization areas and the rural develop-
ment area; however, there were also some conflicts noted in the area parks.
Attached to this memo are five pages of the report that refer to inconsistencies
of the Eden Prairie Guide Plan with the Metropolitan Systems Plan.
The report basically refers to five inconsistencies with the Regional Recreation
Open Space System Plan. Those five are as follows:
1. Because of the date of the preparation (1979) the Five Year Capital
Improvement Program for Eden Prairie Parks Open Space does not indicate
that the City will transfer Anderson Lakes Park and Bryant Lake Park
to Hennepin Country Park Reserve District.
2. Riley Lake Park is shown as a 50 acre community park instead of a 204
acre regional park.
3. The plan does not indicate potential regional trails as approved by the
Metropolitan Council in the Regional Trails Policy Plan Amendment (Nov.
1978) and revised in November 1980.
4. "The plan contains a policy encouraging the development of local recreation
facilities (e.g., playgrounds, athletic fields) in regional parks."
5. "Riley Creek linear park is in incorrectly classified as a regional trail."
After some discussion with staff at the Metropolitan Council, they agreed that numbers
four and five were not included in the Eden Prairie Guide Plan or the Eden Prairie
Parks and Open Space Comprehensive Plan, but were simply mentioned in a memo to
the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission in 1978. That memo was not
intended to be attached to the plan in any way but merely was a discussion item
at that time. Neither the Guide Plan nor the Comprehensive Park Plan encouraged
the developmemt of local recreation facilities in regional parks. Neither the
Guide Plan nor the Comprehensive Park Plan recognize Riley Creek Linear Park as
a regional trail.
51')
-2-
City staff does agree that the Guide Plan and the Park Comprehensive Plan
should be corrected to indicate regional trails as approved by the 1980 Regional
Recreation Open Space Policy Plan. City staff also recommends updating the
Five Year Capital Improvement Program as shown in the Comprehensive Park Plan
te indicate transfer of Anderson Lakes Park and Bryant Lake Park to the Hennepin
County Park Reserve District.
Eden Prairie City staff do not recommend reclassifying Riley Lake Park as a 204
acre regional park and would recommend that the City take the necessary steps
to request the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission and the Metropolitan
Council to consider removing Riley Lake Park as a regional park in the Regional
Recreation Open Space System Plan.
The major reason that that park is shown as a regional park is to provide public
access to Riley Lake. Some of the reasons why that park should not be a regional
park are as follows:
1. Of the 204 acres designated as the park site approximately 160 are
presently under cultivation (bean fields and corn fields do not meet
the Regional Recreation Open Space System defination of regional
recreation open space "an area to which the public has access and
which, because of its natural environment character and development
offers recreational opportunities that attract—TF-.ge numbers of people
Irrespective of political boundaries.") The definition of regional
open space goes on to state that the provision of regional recreation
open space is predicated upon the demand for opportunities to particpate
in particular outdoor recreation activities "certain activities or
combinations of activities are highly dependent upon physical and
natural resources that are most likely to be included only in regional
recreation facilities. These activities include swimming, picnicking,
boating and camping in regional parks." "Local recreation open space
may provide opportunities for some of these activities also, but it is
the resource base as described above and in the classification system
that is the first factor in distinguishing regional from local recreation
open space. Consequently, it is essential to insure that planning and
development of regional recreation open space is conducted within the
context of preserving the regional characteristics of the park. Management
of resources and the operation of regional areas must be compatible with
maintaining and protecting the high quality, uniqueness or suitability
of the area as a regional facility."
2. On January 13, 1981, the Park and Open Space staff of the Metropolitan
Council recommended that the Metropolitan Council approve the "1980
Annual Report of the Cooperative Program for Providing Public Access
Sites on Metropolitan Area Lakes". The Metropolitan Council memo
indicated that the report is consistent with the recently adopted
Recreation Open Space Development Guide/Policy Plan. It should be
noted that this report has prioritized lakes within the metropolitan
area for public access. Priorities go from one down to four. It should
be further noted that Riley Lake is a fourth priortity lake.
3. Boat traffic on Riley Lake is over crowded now and has been for several
years. Even with the development of the community park on that lake
the City would have to limit the size of the boat access parking lot
as a measure of controling crowded conditions. A regional park facility
would encourage even more users of this already overcrowded lake.
517
'-3-
4. The 50 acre community park would allow development of active use
facilities on property that is presently under cultivation. The
additional approximately 130 acres of agriculture land proposed
by the Regional Plan is not conducive to picnicking or camping and
Is, therefore, highly questionable as a unique natural resource
' that should be preserved in a regional park..
5. The Riley Lake Community Park is an integral part of a unique portion
of the Eden Prairie park system that consists of Miller Park on Mitchell
Lake and a linear park system that runs from Mitchell Lake to Rice
Lake south along Riley Creek to Riley Lake Park, and then back north-
easterly from Riley Lake Park, encompassing approximately three ponds,
to Miller Park.
Introducing another governmental agency into this linear park system,
with another set of rules regarding hours of operation and types of use
;
and introducing overnight camping (as proposed for Riley Lake), will
severly limit Eden Prairie's ability to provide a community multi-use
trail system in this area.
6. It is unnecessary to take an additional 150 acres from the tax base
when a 50 acre park will serve the same major purpose - providing
public access to the lake with facilities for swimming and picnicking.
Staff requests the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission t
o
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
the rationale for keeping Riley Lake as a community park and staff reco
m
m
e
n
d
s
the Commission request the City Council to forward this information and
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
amendment to the Regional Recreation Open Space System to the Metropoli
t
a
n
P
a
r
k
s
and Open Space Commission.
Ell.:md •
5-1 9
Minutes — Parks, Recreation &
Natural Resources Commission
unapproved
4 —
February 2, 1981
the track can be eliminated , and if there is a big demand a couple
more tracks can be added at various locations in the City.
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Metropolitan Council Review of Guide Plan
Lambert asked that this Commission decide to accept Riley Lake as a
Community Park or recommend the City apply for Regional Park statue.
In Lambert's opinion, the only plus for having a regional park at
Riley Lake is in having the County pay for it and maintain it. He
personally feels this would be selling Eden Prairie short and be a real
mistake. Lambert added that the criteria to make a site a Regional
Park is amenities it has to offer instead of just the money to be gained.
The corn field terrain at Riley Lake does not constitute "diverse
natural resources" in his opinion.
Anderson reflected that this Commission has spent a lot of time in
reoommending Riley Lake to be a Regional Park.
MOTION: Kingrey moved to recommend keeping Riley Lake as a Community
Park per Staff recommendation, and requests the City Council to forward
this information and proposed amendment to the Regional Recreation
Open Space System to the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission.
Breitenstein seconded the motion. The vote was 3 opposed, 3 in favor,
and Jessen abstained.
DISCUSSION: Breitenstein asked if the City decides to have Riley Lake
remain a Community Park, can it ever be changed to a Regional Park?
Lambert said it is possible but doubtful that it would be changed.
MOTION: VanMeter moved to approve Riley Lake for Regional Park statue.
Anderson seconded the motion. The vote was 3 opposed, 3 in favor, and
Jensen abstained.
B. Minnesota Valley Wildlife Refuge
MOTION: Jeesen moved to recommend support of Concept C of the Minnosota
Valley National Wildlife Refuge/Recreation Area, and that the Fish and
Wildlife Service limit and carefully manage snowmobile trails in the Edon
Prairie area, that equestrian trails be made available within the boundaries
of Eden Prairie, and that Eden Prairie support expansion of the Refuge
boundary to include the bluff aroa as discussed at this meeting.
Kingroy seconded the motion and it carried with VanMeter abstaining.
DISCUSSION: Anderson expressed feelings that the City should take steps
to preserve the bluffs.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Jensen moved to adjourn the meeting at 11:30 p.m. Johnson seconded the motion.
Respectfully submitted,
Carrie Tietz
R000rding seoretary
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
REGARDING:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
John Frane, Acting City Manager
SCOPE OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR EVALUATION OF
CITY HALL, PUBLIC SAFETY, AND PUBLIC WATERS BOGS.
February 12, 1981
Staff has provided alternatives A-F for development of the City Center
Complex.
The Council felt that Altef .nate 'G' had the most promise.
City Staff felt that certain questions needed to be answered as a part of
proceeding further with that alternate that could best be answered by a
Consultant Architect.
The staff suggests the scope of services include:
1. Evaluation of the existing City Hall building and parking areas and
development of building expansion, design and development alternatives,
and size requirements.
2. Evaluation of Public Safety needs, (building & parking) and developme
n
t
of building and site plan desiga development alternatives.
a. This component would include heavy input from Public
Safety research done to date.
b. Would evaluate, inclusion of expansion potential for
Fire Department.
c. Would evaluate Public Safety as an addition to City
Hall or a free standing building.
3. Evaluation of Public Waters/Park and Recreation needs and developmen
t
o
f
building and site plan design development alternates.
4. Evaluation of each separate component would be done within the contex
t
of alternate 'G' as a suggested site plan only. Different site plans -
developed as a result of the component evaluations would be considered.
5. Selected design development drawings would be coof -dinated onto an
overall master site plan. This document would be utilized for zoning
review.
Memo-City Hall Plan page 2
These services would have a 'not to exceed' figure of $10,000. Selection
of an Architect for this preliminary study would not preclUde picking a
different Architect to do the actual design and working drawings.
In chTfingthis scope of services, we are making the following assumptions:
1. The existing water treatment plant will be completed and occupied by
September, 1982. Thus, Public Safety would have to be into a new
building by then.
2. Construction of a new Public Safety building would take 11-12 months,
leaving approximately 5 months for: a) selection of an Architect to
provide design/development drawings; b) formulation of drawings, selec-
tion of alternatives, and rezoning (60 days); c) selection of an
Architect for, and development of, working drawings; d) a bond issue
and sale of bonds; e) bidding and awarding of contract for construction.
3. Public Works/Park and Recreation could be included in the same bond
issue, although construction could probably begin Spring, 1982.
4. Design and construction of a Post Office would be done by 'others'.
5. Overall site improvements: street, sewer, water, parking lots for City
Hall, Public Works/Park & Rec. would be included in the overall project.
6. A major utility project (trunk sewer and water) may be designed and
constructed to coincide with opening of Public Safety.
7. Assuming that this site is a proper area basically for office/commercial/
industrial land use.
If the Council feels that items 1-4 under 'scope' are sufficient, staff
would recommend that the Council authorize staff to draw up a detailed
'Request for Proposal' and solicit quotes. Ultimate selection of an
Architect could be by Council upon review and recommendation by staff.
CE:ss
cerely,
Mary Prahas
Vice—President/heal Estate
Menard, Inc.
BeilaRIARD, INC. GENERAL OFFICES
ROUTE NO 2. EAU CLAIRE. WISCONSIN 54701
PHONE: 1715! 874.5e11
February 12, 1981
Christopher M. Enger
Director of Planning
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Rd.
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
RE: Menard Development in Eden Prairie
TO: The Mayor, City Council and staff of the City of Eden Prairie
A situation has arisen which was not quite covered by our developer's
agreement which I'd like to advise you of.
At the time our project was sukaitted and approved we asked for approval
to build a total of 12,030 square feet of additional stores in conjunction
with our store. Menard Inc. agreed to install face brick on three
exposures of this structure a total height of 12 feet.
The situation that was not discussed or covered in the development
agreement is the fact that the additional stores are built as they are
leased. Therefore, until the last Shop is built we do not reach the
point and location in the construction that we agreed to install the brick.
/ would like this letter to be made a part of our file. Menard Inc.
agrees that if construction does not reach that point within five years
that we will install the brick at the point in construction that we are at
at that time or we will come back to the council to discuss our progress
or lack of and our plans for the completion of the shopping center.
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
REGARDING:
Mayor and City Council
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
John Frane, Acting City Manager
February 12, 1981
REQUEST FROM MENARD INC. TO AMEND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT
Menard, Inc. is requesting an amendment to item #10 of the December 5, 1978
Development Agreement which states:
"Owner shall construct three (3) faces of the main building,
(the south, east and west faces), and the north and south
ends of the central storage building of brick as shown on
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof."
Exhibit C illustrates brick on the northeast end of the proposed retail
stores. Menard Inc. did not build all of that wing of the building, but
provided for adding on by building the common wall of concrete block,
which is now painted brown to match the brick. Only that part of the
northeast facing wall which would be added on to is block, the rest is
brick.
Menard Inc. is requesting that they be allowed 5 years to either complete
the retail stores as originally proposed, (leaving the conerete block as
a temporary exterior wall) or brick the wall as required by the Develop-
ment Agreement and Ordinance #135.
The Planning Staff recommends approval of the request.
CE:ss
1,0014111 1111.11
I/IENAIRD ADDITION
EXHIBIT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM: '
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
John D. Frane, Acting City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
February 13, 1981
Bids for Round Lake Park Shelter
PAL--
At 2:00 P.M., February 13, the City received bids for the Round Lake Park
Shelter. Attached is a copy of the Contractors and the bids submitted.
Deduct alternates were as follows:
1. Omit picnic shelter
2. Omit Cedar shingles add asphalt shingles
3. Omit rubber flooring
4. Omit lockers
5. Omit finished carpentry
6. Omit fixed seating
7. Omit steel stair add wood stair
8. Omit tile work add epoxy paint
9. Delete sound system
10. Omit partitions on second floor
11. Revise start date to April 15 and completion date to September 15
12. Omit painting all exterior spaces except toilet rooms
13. Reference to earth work
The extimated cost for this facility was approximately $150,000. Staff had
developed a program that would include a design that was complimentary to
the existing park pavilion with indoor space that can be used as a warming
house in the winter and a group park shelter in the summer, also space
for a concession stand and swimming beach staff, mens and womens restrooms
and storage for the City Recreation Department and the Athletic Associations.
City staff also requested that the building be constructed of the most mainten-
ance free and vandal proof materials.
6-A3
-2-
The low bid was submitted by Robert 0. Westlund for S257,700, after all
deduct alternates his bid is $199,450.
After some discussion with the architect after reviewing the bids, City staff
recommends the Council reject all bids and have the architect redesign
this facility using stick construction. This would encourage smaller
contractors to bid this facility and would decrease construction costs. Staff
would further suggest that in order to bring this facility down within our
estimated budget, we eliminate storage space, eliminate the office space for
the beach staff and reduce the size of the overall facility.
Gary Nyberg, Smiley Glotter Associates, will be in attendance to answer
questions the Council may have on the submitted bids and the possible redesign
of the facility.
BL:md
523- tr!
SMILEY GLOM! ASSOCIATES 1021 LASALLE AVENUE SOUTS WIWNPAP01.14, 1411440.507A 55403 APCMITUTS ILOGINEEPS PU025005 & B. Sterner,' for Conetruction of Contract 4141.. MAME PARK SHELTER Cor, 40 •00.7-1.. -otal Co•strt.ctIon-. Contractor 014 Bond Adder, Sos Sage II d Alternet• no. 1 Atternate,,Alternete ••3' ..• 3 ele•rnetai Po 4 alternate Wo. 5 Alternate Wo. 1 Alternate No 7 Alternate TAL 0o. 4 o 9 Alternate to to eltern•te to 11 Alternate ma. 12 Alternate BO 23 Coast. rtton Ptys rttll tro'neVBrre.St'Pe.O. Sox 4 IS Exc e Is i or . rItnnesot• 55331 Ac on constructton Co•. Inc. '..... ..'... 2.614.121 a.,22/ /00,9 6 Z 4,••=1 3900 ,,, cm /coo ,5, 040 0,100 5, 102 &a,a /,/zig 1,200 132s- ccao 6,35 i100 10,403 3240 3 2co 'ADC, I -0.0 4 0 WO _iine/0 3002 P.O. Box MI Nato, et nnosote 550 38 ../. 297, 3oo 2et000 3 ;cc lara-Tion • Peterson, rnc. 4701 ease 27rd Street n.c%:=:•,..5T1 toe y•• 26 0,200 31,600 30040 4.040 1,000 5770 34,00 4,..,10 soo k„ce, 6,eco N/c.. v/e- ga4,0 501 So,lotate Office !Isis sOnover 31•. ,rtnirsot• 55437 I 4......' .... V".. Voq, A:90 27/, goo 2q Sep 3gtoo VEIL iii-vo 4777 465S tor? 9Sz 24,42 4026 2537 c Hoc -742 810 802 '?co i gal 1 qco 4800 34,A0 WC. ft.se.0) ti/c.. /000 1742 WC- 8.00 c.3. i aeld Ca•vany 2440 Harriet Avenue South etnnesp,1414. WInnesOt• 554011 Itenetang Ye 00 ens recta*. • P.O. Sox 22,04, Salta 170 =:=::::t.gn:"'' ns,-201 7'1000 12°0 11400 702, 45a, 6 3co cr/OD 1 fa0 2300 /100 e ,70 1-36-0 7203 ttttt ol Ctrcle [Stn.. slInneaots 55435 er.".. 4/. 522,1c0 'SC,D 5600 4400 ?SD 26S0 Zeea I Ipo 1 ou a /&.00 4/Ca Al/c, 14 co WC., 1417.5147-14.0i.enc. 9425 Strod t M cs• en.* i 55420 •loovsn.tt or , Nannesot• 40' 1 272200 ?.',12o0 950 4400 gSes 3.15-0 1140 7.go SSA, I too 22:75" N/4 /2 ;,00 Ilnet$00 Canal, 444.4 le. 4, 1/. 107 S6C1 SIS3t. 111,44 lib 265S, 1196 liSZ qe6 6.45 5920 N/o. 16-co ,o,:) • ratocev41 Construction o. 302 2n4 Avenue S.W. Wee Prague. Minnesota SG041 201700 2,0t,c, /Goo 4Z iogo 6200 47a9 i leo cso boo 3..:e"..rp 1J/c... qs-0 1330 soet 443-E tttttt ot1 COWPany 412 late Avenue South 4.4f4/.. tura...eau SS3113 # .......' 273 700 3.5-006 stoo Li coo ceSe..) 3176o 38-oo /6ce, 4500 / gWO $4,o0 ou/c... loco --.-,1 to,- vs.' 2&62000 ?,49,000 A1/c.. 5440 lop, 7415 /000 1500 15'0,40 e02,5 g zoo cop 15 a Th.C. 001•1r0, Inc. 5'30 0.1440 tttttt • ..... 004 1401 Scrth 144e1.1ne St. Peel. rtsntsacse_15,31) te 4/.... irl,7vo 3200 Z000 4500 i000 4000 Aer.00 2000 750 1540 3coo Al/c, /.5-a 15g2, ,ter,.10,41•4 Assoca•te• 4., Sexton itallelang rt,n-ras,,4ts. rtInreacta 55415 V' ......... 1, i''' 272/71,0 271300 27600 33,5C0 4T.rf-E9 q7e0 II0D 521.0 6100 I 'too loco 4.50 2pew 1 swo 6-goo zoo f,-oeo /200 id C20 5114e1., Construct .- r-7-Co-seol • 10 leir,enteur Avenue west 51..14v1: MAnntscts, 55113 Sa, 111500 la0 41,e6 41.14 'co q2S 6z5" 5.40 ie.c soo ACCI .,',1"Irpontra.M7n050eta 55441 0.'. le. 2q7;.2:0 %Ole i (40 5029 WO 41(.41:, 4414742 /SOD /4/40 -700 5-coo 1,40 4aee, 5.13-c I
DATE : February 17, 1981
COMM. NO.: 8002-A
PROJECT : Eden Prairie Park Shelter
SUBJECT : Overall Project Cost Reduction
Alternates
MEMO BY : Drew Erickson
PRESENT : Bob Lambert, Bob Westlund, Jim Westlund,
S. Smiley, Gary Nyberg, Pandi Cici,
Joe Dolejs, Drew Erickson
MEMO TO : Bob Lambert
The following list represents possible overall cost reductions as
discussed at a meeting in this office on February 17, 1981.
1. Delete slab on grade at open shelter.
2. Reduce roof overhang to 3'-0" and roof height accordingly.
3. Delete exterior ply-wood soffit.
4. Substitute wood framing for precast concrete planks at second
floor.
5. Investigate the feasibility of a wood structural system in lieu
of steel.
6. Substitute lightweight single score concrete block for rock
face block.
7. Eliminate inside pair of vestibule doors and frames.
8. Substitute single door and frame for double doors at entries.
9. Replace sliding pocket door No. 101 with a metal bi-fold.
10. Change all interior 12" concrete block with 8" block.
11. Substitute wood windows for aluminum-cladded windows.
12. The low-bidding contractor has agreed to check with his bidding
sub-contractors and suppliers for additional cost reduction
methods, materials and finishes.
MEMO
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Counlil
John Frane, Acting City Manager
Carl Jullie, City Engineer
February 13, 1981
Bid Award for I.C. 51-354, Contract No. 1
Sealed bids on the above referenced project were opened at lq :00
A.M. on Friday, February 6, 1981. The project covers City weil s
No. 4, 5 and 6, including pump houses and auxilliary power fol.
Well No. 6. Those bids received are shown on the attached sumaryi,
of bids. The low bid submitted by A & K Construction, in the mount
of $652,700, is approximately 10% below the Black & Veatch Coh su l t i ng
Engineers estimate.
It is recommended that the Council adopt Resolution No. R81- 3 4 accep-
ting the bid of A & K Construction, Inc., in the amount of '
$652,700 for I.C. 51-354, Contract No. 1.
CJJ:kh
Attachment
5,2q
February 17, 1981
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
• 'RESOLUTION NO. R81-39
RESOLUTION RECEIVING BID
I.C. 51-354, Contract No. 1
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following
improvements:
I.C. 51-354, Contract No. 1
bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids
received are shown on the attached SuMmary of Bids; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends award of contract to
A & K Construction, Inc., as the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council
as follows:
The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed
to enter into a contract with A & C Construction, Inc., in
the name fo the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of
$652,700 in accordance with the plans and specifications
thereof approved by the Council and on file in the office
of the City Engineer
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
oN.14,„ BLACK & VEATCH CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1500 MEADOW LAKE PARKWAY P.O. BOX NO. 8405 KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64114 TELE: (913) 967.2000 BID TABULATION SUMMARY (1.52-35 ProNallo. Bids Taken St• Date' .c".e. 19 Tabulated by: • Sheet No / NAME AND ADDRESS OF 8100 ER ze4,-,eic-/--/i ..-7.....,o„,, 7. ..g'd,"//7 ,.174/t -,,,I7e .4,., /lee-. Cow/ Co, 4ic. 6>/e4fr' '''''• ''. ./...c. e• iflei/Lt.' DESCRIPTION I 614.4.Piiwec.e., 44 .9,4' ..e.e. g'04) " 14 ...17' pao ." o a s4A0 4 )5grdoo 4, Z77 eve . . z '4,e,IV..."..,...• 7‘. ..,45-..-ezz.4--4, ....--e.a....91.-- /7..,- --.644.- Li.:.,.....- -47,../A1.-- —. . F\ A _..-- 4-,.....,04-s.4. l'Z''...e,e....,.--.-..4,. et...2.,..4-1 A. et.,4 .41,--ff..4 - —. nSt,,,e -7404.;-. • Ge-i,/,-. IV I .•••n•1. 11 ) , . ,e.....% 4;..;4•. •
February 17, 1981
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R81-41
RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND
CALLING FOR A HEARING (I.C. 51-380)
WHEREAS, a report-has been given by the City-Engineer to the
City Council on February 17, 1981, recommending the following improvement
s
to wit:
I.C. 51-350, Street and drainage improvements
on Hilltop Road west of Eden Prairie Road.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements in
accordance with the report and the assessment of property
abutting or within said boundaries for all or a portion
of the cost of the improvement pursuant to M.S.A. Sect.
420,011 to 429.111, at an estimated total cost of the
improvements as shown.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improve-
ment on the 17th day of March, 1981, at 7:30 P.M. at
the Eden Prairie City Hall. The City Clerk shall give
published and mailed notice of such hearing on the
improvements as required by law.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Renzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
521
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
FEASIBILITY REPORT
FOR .
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT NO. 51-380
February 13, 1981
ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION
ON HILLTOP ROAD AND WEST OF EDEN PRAIRIE RD
I hereby certify that this plan, specificatici
or report was prepared under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly registered
professional engineer under the laws of the
• State of Minnesota.
Carl J. Jullie, P.E.
Reg. No.
523"
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED
PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS
I.C. 51-380
HILLTOP ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given that the Eden Prairie City Council will meet at
the City Hall Council Chambers, 8950 Eden Prairie Road, at 7:30 P.M.
on Tuesday, March 17, 1981, to consider the making of the following
described improvements:
I.C. 51-380, Hilltop Road improvements including grading,
paving and storm sewer from Eden Prairie Road to 1800
feet ± west of Eden Prairie Road serving that property lying
south of County Road No. 1, north of Valley View Road, west
of Eden Priarie Road and east of a north/south line
lying 850 feet west of west property line of Eden Heights
subdivision. Total estimated cost is $86,335.
Pursuant to Minnesota State Laws, Section 429.011 to 429.111. The area
proposed to be assessed for such improvements is all that property
within or abutting on the above described limits. Written or oral
comments relating to the proposed improvements will be received at
this meeting.
Publish: Eden Prairie Community News
March 5 and 12, 1981
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Kathy Hermann, Deputy City Clerk
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden. Prairie, MN 55344
529
FEASIBILITY REPORT
INTRODUCTION
In the fall of 1979, the City of Eden Prairie was queried regarding the
possibility of upgrading and/or improving the quality of Hilltop Road
because of the dust problems and lack of proper drainage. The alternate
solutions were outlined by the staff. The alternates, accompanied by cost
data and staff recommendations, were placed on an informational sheet and
circulated amongst the abutting property owners on Hilltop Road. The
owners were asked for their comments and preference. A Majority of the
property owners indicated a preference for Alternate No. 1, which is
described in the following section of this report. Alternate No. 2,
involved placing a 2 bituminous mat over the existing subgrade and
eliminating the storm sewer. Alternate No. 3 was seal coating only,
also with no storm drainage.
The City Council referred the proposed improvement to the City Engineer
for study and feasibility report under Resolution No. R80-117. The study
area and assessment boundaries are shown on the Project Location Map,
Figure 1.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION - ALTERNATE NO. 1
Proposed Improvement Contract 51-380 would include grading of the existing
road as deemed necessary to provide conformance to existing City standards,
a 4" gravel base and a 2" bituminous surface 24' wide with sodding and
topsoil as required to restore adjacent boulevard areas. Visual inspec-
tion of the existing roadway indicates that some realignment of the road
will be required to center the road within the existing right-of-way.
Since sanitary sewer and water services are available for extension to
the area, the proposed street section is interim and does not include
concrete curb and gutter.
Due to the landlocked drainage conditions at the west end of Hilltop
Road, a drainage system using 18" storm sewer will be provided within the
right-of-way at the lowest point in the new road. The defined drainage
area northerly and westerly of Hilltop Road slopes in a southerly direction,
thereby contributing water runoff to the proposed storm sewer system.
This drainage area, along with the Hilltop Road surface drainage, con-
stitutes approximately 26 acres which will require 18" sewer pipe to
adequately handle present and future runoff. Storm sewer pipe
would be placed in the 33' right-of-way located at the west end of the
Eden Heights subdivision to provide underground drainage in a southerly
direction from Hilltop Road to an existing drainage swale located approxi-
mately 630 feet south of Hilltop Road. This storm sower is required
to accomodate proper storm water drainage and erosion control.
PROJECT COSTS AND ASSESSMENTS
The total estimated cost for the project is 586,335. The breakdown of
this cost is shown on the project cost summary included in this report.
5U)
531
The preliminary assessment roll shows the cost assignable to each parce
l
to be assessed. The parcels to be assessed and/or the assessment bound-
aries are shown on Figure 1.
FEASIBILITY
The improvements proposed herein are feasible and will result in a benefit
to the properties to be assessed.
4.1,4 NO.-1 "" •n• ............ ......... . • % • NO 0)4**-•„, ...... , ( e ..... ... ..... ma am , ..... .......... P- 4 L z:..,L.Tr,p . ' ' ' DRAINAGE AREA a If ... ' ........ i, .......... ........ r ' ASSESSMENT BOUNDARY , 42r: 41 '..-• 15 i 117 • 4 is ASSESSMENT 04 • (s)43 vi44 . : • • of). STREET t1D (4) Qt;) LIMITS ,*.n ii...4. ,. ...., 1 ,,,. ;-,:r...7.-•-•17:•nnn•n•n•-n;-.!"=":timi.......5........... IN,. ....... .:. ........................... : . , ,,..........,r,. . 0 •1 Ian ...ammo, mat limaaa woo mrit MO MI* .11 ORM i. MD aw•lowlim,..••n••n am, awl laS-Nano lalaiji.) .. „ 1 ''S:a - ROD: - • if) _.41 1::: O• . ; FII 9 406.0 (4) ..... . ................. ... - . .... ..... ...... I....... , ... ................................ T 4./ • I • Jav • ....I • 1.1 • 0.0 ......... 116 5. % 1 1 IS, 1' 4 I vN. Is) . (,4) Co) (5) (ow) PD (p0) ; ; a & ../•• /a I • STORM SEWER .(J.) I 'N ,#.4 • (z 5 4 • 3 z • - PROJECT I' i•2 LOCATION it/1AP LC. ,51-380. _ -0 Rd. 3 (P) (r)
S •
10 )5"5
: 545. __. Itt
5oo. 1 -/o
5200, . 1.50 1E500 •
3.06. .1.4)400
• • ....
- ..15o0 _150.
53oo . 2_00 .C9,GcC
• .02 Ce;.o.00 1'O.
.I7 .. .4.00
•.•145 zfrex,
4- • . 6F-0.o 3/2470
5 .74
\4 200
)4.
J- 4 52, 0 7 5
•
5.`f.
5.y.
5 y.
Tco
c.y.
L.F.
EA.
c.y.
Ftel...11.411,i4e.-r Es-pm/a-F.-. CI= ' CCDst
: I.C.. 5'I -350 - • •
. •• •
1, :Vat-LT° r
m m,D 0T
Dc-e.11:77-vo w
. .
I . stop., C;$1 CoMMOr..) eY-C.EA./A•Tlos-.1_
2 21c9.,0 sue)GRA, excAvt>tiokt
3
v9.zt GRAout.A.R. Dpz.e.ov.i (LV.)
4 slo,, Y2.3 Commow Exjezou..) (L.V,)
2211. (col ..AGG;IZEGAT-7-- .
.(421 114 IC14-7. MOD..
Co 2341. CotO 2. T'ItCg-•5 I/UM 11.7.10Us
Wapkzir•JG CoOess-.
2344. Col 0 4" 741c.K. BITI)mwous
MATEZIAL. '
ES 257 5 5 o b .
9 •275.551 FETZ-r1t..12.elz-•
id ""75.55I To?solt.. ifx,eJ2ov../(21 -41cr.)
RcP S—ev../E.,w.,c.L. 4. .
STA1,11:›Aizt, CA-Tc.14 I3A5
i3 Pipe STA-F..,'1 1...17...471Cti
14- 0" •C-P SEAJJER
19
STMET 5)5-TorAL
UWT
Quakrtire‘ Fkice • Amcgvr
15 " 12.c.r
157 Qcp. 9avfaz. L.F.
fAFJ DAZ.b.. 14)-1 .1401_2
Fipe STA.51LA2.ATos...s
21p. 24p.
50 2-S E:
. 5.6-ToTAL.
:
o.'24.20 13)4-10
2.40 I1 O 4Z0:
1 909.0 oo
Ill C,75. I)I
25 . 0 5T'S
500.0 •
In "T-r,-r I
r .• • 1 :."..)•••• 1 I
Ii•, 1. 1- , .
-7'-
a-T1 007-•cz,s1- ••4° h_oro
305 :-TaTekt-
_circ__E--1J11-16e17..10G.At-lo 4 1 1 244
_LADis;111-115-07...ATive-r_.Cix-trs Awc> -
.-P4Irog.A.z,r_ FiK)Akic-10C; Ccr-irs
toGz i 16,0
14-
3 20 1 115
24,8 _!_
• .-• 66 ) icao
-
_ mO Covr SO t-ANAAfe-f_ • _
rari-m4-1.-sc) Cc*. ALLa1:-/Vja: AS. FDLrLOWS
ae-,-rft,\AT D 9rige-1 coe,T
ra.,frimA -re.co F-izoo -r ft:)=TTA4a
-ro
(0(0 )1(po.DwiDed W74-. =7_
-
• .
-rp kTeD DP-Aio4(aa--- czy-,T•
TafAt- MATet> Aczeac,a
-To ct:e
1 , so 1 -1 Juicer, 113..
' i
1 6.114.si o
u It rs It X) rls IS PRELIMINARY ASS. ..SMENT ROLL IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 51- 38o PARCEL DESCRIPTION CLIGER ASSESSABLE • FRONT FEET __-LSTREET) STREET DRAINAGE ASSESSABLE ASSESSABLE COST (tar,4 b-..f) ACREAGE DRAINAGE ASSESSABLE • COST/AC.. • ($ ) NET ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT 5;1E&. ZoT t:c,) 2. ZZ l!c7 -- 1 - 111 For's, Wor4 G_ It 2.A-rM0.JD Cearsli 125 II It 15, • C. Etch.' ts.szt, Pkze.rt-ts 42 'Z AL-1-214 1.4,6,544 IS 5Lct7t2Acia. 4 Zoo 4-3 tt tt,i1A-r st.)1.:er. II 5 —1. L. V.A. Zoo 4.. ‘1,)N1.22:7.-114E.Kr•AANI too fi h r too u te>o ti e./.41e..., 11 44- 3 et.,--rt.Aot:,p Zoo " 4 2 oca 5 -4 014 I.. i00 !c Ctivo, 100 ; 1 2.00 5 7,-.;014..1.-..Cr...14e1ES- 00 1-1Et s, 1.4 %;...0:2- 14,0 -•-•' 4. L.. 1 IOC, 1.5 I 0 3,02 .509z .2177 • al tV, b-ioz 2..0 510z 1.0 • 155.1 04 7.71o2 135.1 • 6.4 14.9.‘ 09.3. 2.1 42,8 1544+ 144,4 ZOar 1502 152., I4:2.7 SI 81 •10P3 4te. • .15-44 •1?“:r2 44-ly 53Zei 1851 •I1:1C40 444 !Z-111.1 .1 IPAA
PRELIMINARY ASSLSMENT ROLL IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 51- PARCEL DESCRIPTION O'fINFR ASSESSABLE FRONT FEET (STREET) STREET DRAINAGE ASSESSABLE ASSESSABLE COST( )_ ACREAGE DRAINAGE ASSESSABLE COST/AC. NET ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT Gz.04,s5,' 100 rz_ La r.cusetir- xoto 0.4 M &=1e.0).-1 too M.A . !c.1.1t2L*0,...1 too 1.A . A . N10 cf._•504.1 n00 0.4 /s1 too 0.4 0.4zi. ;14;2 V-1e,o0 too Lt II 11 ?ioo 04 Ii It k-r1 :7;(' IKC:2-1,X9 FC,Z. Pee•1‘005' -ficArale Qop.C) St)tr-ro.c.mnl&
PROJECT SCHEDULE
I.C. 51-380
Feb. 17, 1981
Feb. 26, 1981
Mar. 17, 1981
April 21, 1981
May 21, 1981
June 2, 1981
July 15, 1981
Oct. 1981
Present feasibility report to the City
Council and set hearing date
- -
Mail notice of hearing to E.P. Community
News (Publish 3/5 and 3/12) Mail to
property owners 3/2
Public hearing •
Approve plans & specs and order ads for bids
Open bids
Award Contract
Construction completed
Levy assessments
53q