Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 12/02/1980 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL ( TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 198D 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUIJCIL MEMBERS: l Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Dean Edstrom, Dave Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and Paul Redpath COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Roger Pauly; Planning Director Chris Enger; Finance Director John Frane; Director of Community Services Bob Lambert; City Engineer Carl Jullie; and Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary INVOCATION PLEIGE IF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. PRESENTATION BY EDEN FZAIRIE AMERICAN LEGION POST NO. 409 (Hank Bach, Cedric Warren and Vernon Seck) III. CONSENT CALENDAR 9 A. Clerk's License List Page 2821 y' f - Page 2B22 B. Scoreboard for Community Center (continued from 11/18/80) C. Snowmobile Trail Resolution Page 2823 I. Permission to receive bids for 1 skid steer loader Page 2826 E. Resolution No. 8I-235 granting final approval for Municipal Industrial Page 2827 Development bends in the amount of $2,399.148.18 for Braun-Kaiser F. Joint Use Rental Agreement with MWCC for IL-1 Trunk Sewer Page 2B28 IV. PUILIC HEARINGS A. EIENGATE SINGLE FAMILY by Catco, Inc. Request to rezone approximately Page 2831 41 acres from RM 6.5 to R1-13.5, preliminary plat approval for 83 single family lets, and approval of Environmental Assessment lWlorksheet. Located nerth of luck Lake Trail and west of new tell Read. (Resolution No. 80-232 - EAW; Ordinance No. 88-31 - rezoning; and Resolution No. 80-233 - preliminary plat) CABLE TV PUILIC HEARING V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 4101 - 4302 Page 2863 VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS Belvedere Interim Use Amendment by On-Belay. Request to change dental Page 2368 office interim use at 8480 Franlo Road to an adolescent treatment center to be called "Prairie House". Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,Dec, 2, 1980 B. Menard Addition Rellat by Menard, Inc. Request to replat Outlots D, E Page 2893 & F, Menard Addition (Resolution No. 80-234) l C. Request from Eden Hills Company for reauthorization of their Municipal Page 2909 Industrial Development Bond resolution. /" S „,:7 VIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members — '.77.‘1/`„ 1. Appointment to the Human Rights & Services Commission to fill an unexpired term to 2/28/83 { 2. Appointment to the Development Commission to fill an unexpired term to 2/28/83 ,A1 r 16,asuq B. Report of City Attorney f/4'4. GTl ifs r� 1. Animal Patrol - Joint Powers Agreement 4, g c,.,,t,i,, Page 2910 C. Report of City Manager 1. Purchase agreement for 10 acres from Hustad O. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Park Use Ordinance • Page 2916 ,, y��! ) Sherwood Townhouse Association Request Page 2926 E. Report of City Engineer 1. Change Order No. 1, I.C. 51-341 - Anderson Lakes Parkway F. Report of Finance Director 1. Utility rates (continued from November 18, 1980) Page 2931 IX. NEW BUSINESS X. ADJOURNMENT. • r ( • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICANSE APPLICATION LIST December 2, 1980 CONTRACTOR (Multi-Family & Comm.) CANDY SHOP Amcon Corporation Jerry's Foods Garden City Construction Co. Magney Construction Co. BAKERY DEPARTMENT Niwinski construction Inc. The Wooden Bird Factory, Inc. Jerry's Foods Woodrich Building Systems Co. MEAT DEPARTMENT CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 Family) Jerry's Foods A. A. G. Construction Johnson-Reiland Construction, Inc. 3.2 BEER ON SALE Roy D. Johnson Builders, Inc. Prime Properties, Inc. Jerry's Foods Skluzacek Construction Stecker & Sons, Inc. 3.2 BEER OFF SALE R. A. Ungerman Construction Co. Paul Walentiny Const. Jerry's Foods PLUMBING CIGARETTES & TOBACCO Hanson-Kleven Plumbing Co. Jerry's Foods Solar Mechanical Steve Schmit Plumbing VENDING MACHINES Wayzata Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc. Coca Cola Bottling Midwest RESTAURANT Gelco Corporation Gelco Corporation Jerry's Foods Physical Electronics • These licenses have been approved by the department head responsible for the licensed activity. r l)) . lNQ/tAllt • - Rebecca M. Warner, Licensing Clerk • • . 9 721 . MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: November 28, 1980 • SUBJECT: Scoreboard for Community Center On November 18, 1980, the City Council reviewed a proposed design for an ice arena scoreboard that was to be donated to the City. The scoreboard had an exceptionally large advertising sign. The Council requested staff to come back with a design showing a smaller advertising sign. Mike Wakely of HAEW wanted to meet with the bank officials for their approval of a new design prior to bringing it back to the Council. Staff requests the City Council to continue this item until Mr. Wakely is ( ready with a new design. BL:md . • • 2722 • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: November 25, 1980 SUBJECT: Resolution on Minnesota Trail Assistance Program Earlier this year, the City Council approved the Eden Prairie Snowdrifters Club request for City approval of the Snowmobile Trail System within the City again in 1980-81. Attached is a Department of Natural Resources Resolution whereby the City of Eden Prairie agrees to be the sponsoring local agency for the Snowdrifters Snowmobile Trail again this year. The City has done this for several years and this does not involve any commitment for City • funds or maintenance. State law requires a local unit of government to be a sponsoring agency for any snowmobile clubs requesting State grant trail assistance. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. BL:md • 2 323 • r1/r.03602.02 Igor.0/e0 {�{y OP MIMEO,0, MINNESOTA TRAIL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ll,'Ytl' eeruur,nsowns AGREEMENT • THIS AGREEMENT, Made this 7th day of November , 19 ,between the STATE OF MINNESOTA, acting by and through the Commissioner of Natural Resources, hereinafter relerred to as the"Slate", and City of Edan Prairie hereinafter referred to as the "local unit of government", relating to the establishment of a proposed trail known as Eden Prairie Snotvdrifters WHEREAS,the local unit of government desires to establish,construct and maintain a public trail;and WHEREAS, the local unit of government has applied to the State for a grants-in-aid for said trail and has submitted lire Minnesota Trail Assistance Program's application form, maps,ownership list, work plans, and resolution of the local unit of government authorizing the proposed trail as outlined in said documents an' said application form, map,and workplan is attached hereto as Exhibit A hereafter referred to as the "Plan". A. (TRAIL OBLIGATION OF THE LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT) The local unit of government shall construct, operate and maintain the proposed trail in accordance with the Minnesota Trail Assistance Program Manual hereinafter referred to as the"Manual"and the Application or Project Proposal form. The local unit of government shall not amend, revise or change the approved Application or Project Proposal without the written consent of the Regional Trails and Waterways Coordinator. In connection with the establishment of the trail,the local unit of government shall: (11 Forthwith proceed to acquire necessary interests in lands and open the trail to the public.The local unit of government must acquire land in fee,easement, lease or permit for said trait.The term of said interest shall be no less than four (4) months between November 15th of any year and March 15th of the succeeding year for snowmobile and ski touring tri-ls;and no less than five (5) months between May 15th of any year and October 15th of the same year for equestrian trails.For each parcel of land crossed by the proposed trail, the local unit of government shall obtain from the owner of said parcel and submit to the State Trails Coordinator a permit,lease,easement or fee title for said crossing. (a)A person having personal knowledge of ownership shall sign an affidavit that the person whose name appears on the document of conveyance or permit is the same person in possession of said premises and one and the same who is grantee of the last instrument of record in the office of said County _ Recorder of the county in which the land lies conveying said premises. (b)Any instrument of conveyance or permit with a consideration exceeding S500.00 shall be y accompanied by an Attorney's Certificate of Title. (2)Construct and provide adequate maintenance which shall include keeping the trail reasonably safe for public use;provide sanitation and sanitary facilities when needed;and provide other maintenance as the State may require. Should the local unit of government fail to expedite establishment and construction of the trail and thereafter fail to provide for such adequate maintenance, the State may withhold future payments to • the local unit of government and terminate this agreement. B. (TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE) The State will give technical assistance to the local unit of government In establishing the trail. ll C. (REIMBURSEMENT) The State agrees to reimburse the local unit of government 65%of the cost of trail acquisition, development and maintenance, except grooming which will be reimbursed 00%. All costs will be in acr:onLmce with the allowable charges and costs listed in the Manual. This grant will not exceed $ 700,00 n7U D. (PAYMENT) The local unit of government must submit a request for reimbursement and attach worksheets lurnished by the Department of Natural Resources for all approved costs incurred in acquiring, developing, maintaining and grooming the trail, all in accordance with the Manual. Additionally, the local unit of government must submit original receipts of actual approver;purchases exceeding S50.00. Further, the first request for reimbursement for costs incurred by groaning must be made lay January 31, and the last day of every month thereafter while costs are incurred during the grooming year. ( The books,records,documents,and accounting procedures,and practices of the local unit of government relevant to this grant shall be subject to examination by the contracting department and the legislative auditor. Records shall be sufficient to reflect all costs incurred in performance of this grant. (1)First Payment: Upon receipt of the request for reimbursement evidencing acceptable trail costs of $500.00 or more for acquisition, development or maintenance, the State agrees to reimburse the local unit of government for approved costs in accordance with the Manual. All services provided by the local unit of government pursuant to this grant shall be performed to the satisfaction of the STATE,as determined in the sole discretion of its authorized agent and shall not receive payment for work found lay the STATE to be unsatisfactory. (2)Subsequent Payments: Each thirty(30) successive days after the first payment, the local unit of government may submit invoices evidencing ace-ptable trail costs. Said payments shall continue to be made until authorized reimbursements for the costs of said trail as provided herein is satisfied or otherwise ter• minated as provided herein. (31 Trail Segments: It is understood that if the trail system is developed in segments,the local unit of government may submit requests for reimbursement as soon as continuous and workable segments are completed. E. (STATE LIABILITY) Notwithstanding the grants•imaid as provided herein, the State of Minnesota shall not be liable for such costs as are incurred by the local unit of government because funds for said trail are depleted. F. (TERM) This Agreement shall be effective on the date it is executed as to encumbrance by the ( Commissioner of Finance,and shall remain in effect until two years from said date. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. APPROVED: DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT BY: (Counter Ic ier tvvnasnl (Town) TITLE: BY: -' DATE: TITLE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION BY: BY: TITLE: DATE: DATE: COMMISSIONER or ADMINISTRATION: BY: o.v.,ldmm nl r+awn r,r.n,,,ar. , Autnn,irud Su"SIu'♦ (1 DATE: DATE: COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE: E NCUhI CF lI F D awr.,nn,n ni Nilo.l He.,wn.. DEfARTMUNI OF FINANCE DATE: BY: "R^i • • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council T11RU: Robert Lambert, Director of Community Services FROM: Stephen Calhoon, Park Planner DATE: November 21, 1980 SUBJECT: Permission to Receive Bids for One Skid-Steer Loader Staff requests permission to advertise and receive bona fide bids for a 45 horsepower Diesel Skid-Steer Loader. The specifications of this machine are much like that of the 'Bobcat' the City leased from Case Power and Equipment this year. Sealed bids will be received and opened Thursday, January 8, 1981 at 10:00 A.M. • SC:md • Ip • • • • • t 232 To: Mayor & Council From: John Frane Date: November 26, 1980 Re: Final approval M.I.D.B's for Braun-Kaiser $2,300,000 The Braun-Kaiser partnership is requesting final approval of their project. The documents have been approved by the City Attorney's office. Resolution #80-235 has not been included in your packet; it will be in the Mayor's signature file on December 2nd. i - 2621 • • MEMO • TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager • FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: November 30, 1980 • SUBJECT: Joint Use Rental Agreement No. 438 The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has requested the City's renewal of the Joint Use Rental Agreement No. 438. This agreement • covers the DL-1 trunk sanitary sewer in the northwestern corner of Eden Prairie which serves portions of the City of Chanhassen. The renewal period is Jan. 1, 1981, to December 31, 1981. Recommend approval of the attached Statement of Agreement Renewal. • CJJ:kh Attachment • • • • . 71,.2 7 fJ Mr. Roger Ulstad i City Manager City of Eden Prairie ( 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 . RE: JOINT USE RENTAL AGREEMENT FOR 1981 Dear Mr. Ulstad: In accordance with Section 4 of the Joint Use Rental Agreement No. 438 between the City of Eden Prairie and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, such contract can be renewed by consent of both parties. We wish to renew for another year the Joint Use Rental Agreement No. 438 under the same terms and conditions contained i:; the Agreement which is presently in force between the City of Eden Prairie and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. • 1 The Renewal Agreement is enclosed in triplicate for your endorsement. We have signed the enclosed statement as our intention of renewing the Agreement and ask that you also sign and return to us two (2) of the executed copies and retain one (1) for your records. 4 Should you have any questions or suggested changes to the basic contract agreement, please contact us. , Your cooperation in accepting this renewal procedure • is greatly appreciated. Very truly yours, eili 6'tif//‘—• George W. Lusher • Chief Administrator GWL:LRB:ht Enclosures cc: LaRae Bohn, Accounting Supervisor • Director of Operations Rick Arbour, Interceptor Manager ISO MCI 2010111411 BLDG. 71141.6011KT IT r(CTI mini rnul mn wol 612 999.842) 2? 9 • • STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT RENEWAL JOINT USE RENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 438 The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and the City of Eden Prairie agree to renew the Joint Use Rental Agreement No. 438 under the same terms and conditions contained in the Agreement which " is currently in force between these parties. The Renewal period for Joint Use Rental Agreement No. 438 shall be January 1, 1981 - December 31, 1981. • That both parties agree to the renewal period and terms is evidenced by the signatures affixed to this statement. FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE THE METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION . (TITLE) Salisbury Adams, Chairman eiioy"7 .0 (TITLE) George W. Lusher, Chief Administrator . Dated Dated • • • • • • • • • 273U edengate • ( Pursuant to the Submission Requirements for zoning and platting requests, as set forth in the Zoning Summary, Catco, Inc. submits the following: B. Specific Plan Requirements 1. Title. The property legally described in the attached application is owned in fee simple by Edina Building, Inc., 7400 Metro Boulevard, Suite 411, Edina, Minnesota 55435. Said fee simple title of Edina Building, Inc. is subject to the vendees interest of Catco, Inc. under the terms of a certain Contract for Deed between Edina Building, Inc., as vendor, and Catco, Inc. , as vendee. Catco, Inc. is a Minnesota corporation whose shareholders are as follows: SHAREHOLDERS % OF OWNERSHIP Richard L. Hawthorne 33 1/3 Mike Finnemann 33 1/3 Harry Gustafson 33 1/3 2. Developer. Development of the project will be carried out by Catco, Inc. The principals of Catco, Inc. have had considerable experience with residential and commer- cial developments in connection with projects in the Twin Cities, including Eden Prairie and other communities and are familiar with all phases of platting, development, and construction. The developers' involvement with the project will probably continue until all lots are sold. 3. Fiscal, Economic. Funds for development will be supplied internally or from interim loans from local lenders in regard to work performed by the developers. This request, as proposed, contemplates installation of sewer, water, curb and gutter, and road surfaces by the City with assessments against the individual lots. 4. Development Method. Lots will probably be sold indi- vidually or in small numbers to independent builders and prospective homeowners for construction of homes. 5. Identify Boundaries and Boundary Conditions. See attached neighborhood framework. 6. Location. See attached neighborhood framework. 7. Regional Relationships. The existing fabric of the area is one of single family plats and meandering cul-de-sacs. Duck Lake Trail and Dell Road will provide primary circu- lation needs. The Edengate circulation concept calls for an indirect loop road connecting Dell road with Harrogate Drive and the adjacent subdivision. 2 fI 8. Existing Land Use and Occupancy. The property is currently undeveloped with no specific land use or occupancy. 9. Existing Transportation Systems. None. 10. Existing Zonings. The property is currently zoned rural but was authorized for a Planned Unit Development in the 1970's, pursuant to an application submitted by the previous contract vendee. The P.U.D. contemplated use of this property for multiple residential buildings. The previous contract vendee of the property abandoned the P.U.D. concept, however, before any portion of it was implemented. The applicants, as the current owners of the property, wish to develop the site exclusively for detached single family homes. The lower density use propsed herein is, thus, more in conformance with the current City Guide Plan Framework. 11. City Guide Plan Framework. Combination residential, public. 12. Critical Public Decisions. Critical public decisions which will be necessary in regard to this project include City approval of the plat of Edengate, zoning changes, approval and inspection of all improvements. 13. Additional General Project Information. Portions of the site lie within the City Flood Plain Zone. All areas within the Flood Plain Zone will be dedicated to the public for use as park and open space. C. Site Area Analysis 1. Development Objectives. It is the objective of the applicants to develop the site as a fine neighborhood of quality detached single family homes. 2. Site Plan. As per attached exhibits. 3. Grading. As per attached exhibits. 4. Utility Plan. As per attached exhibits. 5. Preliminary Architectural Drawings. Not applicable. 6. Legal Instruments for Plan Implementation. The appli- cants will maintain control over design, construction, materials and minimum size, by use of restrictive covenants containing architectural controls to ensure that the homes built on the site will reflect the owner's objectives of creating a dignified neighborhood of quality single family homes. } 2232 // 7. Housing or Land/Building Use Profile. Not applicable. 1. 8. Zoning Classification and/or Variationsfrom City Ordinances. As per attached application and exhibits. 9. Phasing and Construction Schedule. The proposed plat of Edengate shall be carried out as a single phase development and will involve all of the property owned by the applicant in this area. No other phases of development, involving platting of surrounding property, is contemplated by the applicant at this time. The applicant intends to develop the site as soon as possible. It is hope that lot sales and construction of new homes will commence in the Spring of 1901 and it is expected that construction of homes will continue for approximately three years. 10. Additional Information: We have tried to minimize the amount of grading on the site and have endeavored to provide a continuous road system. However, due to some severe changes in topography, we are forced to propose two cul-de-sacs. In conformance with the requirements of the Preliminary Plat Procedures and Zoning Submission Requirements this letter shall serve as the owner's authorization to the City of Eden Prairie for the construction by the City, upon the site, of one f or more "Land Development Signs" and such authorization is hereby granted. If there are any questions or problems of if additional informa- tion is needed, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, GUST ON 8 AD , P.A. Grego . Gustaf n Attorney for Catco, Inc. Z.33 approved Planning Coninission Minutes November 10, 1980 Members absent: Hakon Torjesen A. EDENGATE SINGLE FAMILY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET. Request for approval of EAW. Bearman requested that the plat map included in the EAW be revised to reflect the plat as ultimately approved. Gartner asked what the 15% of electrical usage on page 7 of the EAW sunder the heading "Processing" was for. The Planner replied that the category is used for electrical appliances other than for heating.and air conditioning. Gartner moved Sutliff seconded, to Find No Significant Impact as per the Environmental Assessment Worksheet as corrected. Motion carried 5-0-1. Retterath abstaining. 2 V approved Planning Commission Minutes October 27, 1980 Members absent: Liz Retterath B. EDI:NGATE SINGLE FAMILY, by Catco, Inc.. Request to rezone approximately 40 acres from RM'5.5 to R1-13.5, preliminary plat approval for 83 single family lots, and approval of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Located North of Duck Lake Trail and West of new Dell Road. A public hearing. The Planner introduced Mr. Gregg Gustafson one of the owners of the land. Gustafson stated that the site's total acreage is 120 with 40 acres buildable and 80 which will be contributed to the City for parks. He reviewed the past history of the property. He futher stated that he was in agreement with the staff report, except he felt the central cul-de-sac should be allowed to remain as planned rather than modified to a loop road. The Planner reviewed the staff report dated October 24, 1980, the problems with new Dell Road, grading, and traffic on the roads. Torjesen asked that because of the grading required, if this is an appropriate land use. The Planner replied that there is a substantial amount of grading that has to be done and also stated that becuase of downhill and uphill lots the pads should be graded at this time. He felt, however, that this amount of (" grading was not extraordinary for single family development and was a proper land use. Levitt asked where Dell Road goes when leaving Edengate. The Planner replied it goes north to Toinline Road which it would intersect 1 mile east of T.N. 101. • Levitt asked if there is an encroachment in the floodplain. The Planner replied no. Levitt asked where the closest neighborhood park is. The Planner replied it is planned approximately 1000 ft. to the north. Hidden Ponds would be 2/3 of a mile south. Levitt asked if there will be a walkway along Dell Road. The Planner replied yes. Dearman asked what the timeframe for the finishing of new Dell Road was. The Planner replied that Dell Road would proceed north concurrent with development and continue south of Duck Lake Trail within a year. Dearman asked if there are any plans for the 80 acres dedicated to the City. The Planner replied that Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department has generally considered this area for natural open space. G Dearman asked what. the average numher of daily trips was from the proposed develop- ment. The Planner replied about 800. approved Planning Commission Minutes -3- October 27, 1980 Gary Nissen, 6721 Tartan Curve was concerned with the traffic that he believed would travel Harrogate Drive. Bentley arrived at 8:26 PM. Thomas Collins, 6641 Tartan Curve, was concerned that there would be a road up against his property. The Planner replied that he would have a lot against the property. Glenn Keller, 6721 Lochanburn Road, was concerned with the increased amount of traffic and felt that Harrogate Drive should not be continued through. Gartner asked if the cul-de-sac at Ha-rogate could be there temporarily until Dell Road is extended to the north. The Planner replied that it was technically possible, but if cul-de-saced, Iarrogate Drive, as a practical matter would probably always remain. Levitt asked if the central cul-de-sac was extended would there be a loop road created. The Planner replied yes. Gustafson stated that the proponent would prefer to retain the central cul-de-sac. William Neilson, 6761 Tartan Curve asked what effect this development would have on the property between Duck Lake Trail and Purgatory Creek. Gustafson replied that Catco Inc. only owns the land to the north. . • The Planner asked who owns the property to the south. Gustafson replied Edina Building. Joseph Mischel, 6681 Tartan Curve, asked how much of ton. donated land the children can play on. The Planner replied that the City could improve the land for active park use, if the Park and Recreation and Natural Resources Commission so recommends. Mischel also explanined that he was concerned with the grading that is already being carried on the site. He also felt that the lots adjbinin Lochanburn should match 1 for 1 with existing lots. Kevin Disse, 6851 Sugar Hill Circle, asked if the telephone lines will be underground. The Planner replied yes. Robert Kruell, 6780 Tartan Curve, stated that he wanted the developer to comment on the type of homes to be put in Edengate. Gustafson replied that the developer sells the land to the contractor or the people who want to buy the land and also stated that it is up to them as to what kind of house they want to build. Bentley asked if the drainage swale along the properties western boundary is on the lot line. The Planner replied that it could be graded so it could occur any place, but the current plan did not depict it properly. Clenn Keller, 6721 Lochanburn Road, explained that many of the residents go hiking or cross country skiing and asked if a walkway through the development to the flood- plain could he made. The Planner replied that the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission would reivew that more specifically. Torjesen asked if the City is within it's legal rights to be grading on this site for new Dell Road prior to an approved development plan. The Planner replied that the City had entered into a contract to construct Dell Road as part of the previous development. approved Planning Conunission Minutes -4- October 27, 1980 Lewis Asklund, 18219 Ginavale Lane, felt that the City should require a bond .on the developer. The Planner replied that Dell Road is a City project. MOTION 1 Levitt moved to close the public hearing. Torjesen seconded, motion carried 6-0. MOTION 2 Levitt moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning from RM 6.5 to R1-13.5 as per the plans dated 9/26/80 and the 10/24/80 staff report with the following addition: 1. That the connection to Harrogate Drive be deleted and the new road cul-de-saced. Gartner seconded. DISCUSSION Bentley asked if the accesses to Dell Road outlined in the staff report are included. Levitt replied yes, and also stated that he would call special attention to review of totlots and a pathway by,the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. Motion carried 4-2. Bearman and Bentley voted no. MOTION 3 Levitt moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat l dated 9/26/80 based upon the 10/24/80 staff report with the following addition: 1. That the connection to Harrogate Drive be deleted and the new road cul-de-saced. Gartner seconded, motion carried 5-1. Bearman voted no. • 273' HEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: Chris L"nger, Oirector of Planning APPLICANT: Catco, Inc. FEE OWNER: Edina Bldg., Inc. Subject to C.D. in favor of Catco, Inc. REQUEST: Rezone of 40 acres from RM 6.5 to R1-13.5 and preliminary platting of 33 single family lots. PROJECT: EOENGATE JINGLE FAMILY PROJECT LOCATION: Located in the Northwest corner of the City, bordered on the South by Duck Lake Trail, on the West by the existing Lochenhurn single family subdivision and on the East. by Purgatory Creek. • DATE: October 24, 1980 BACKGROUND • The overall site area is 120 acres, approximately 40 acres on the west end of the property is requested for development. The balance of the property is Flood Plain and the developer proposes to dedicate these 80- acres to the City as his park contribution. The property was zoned RN 6.5 for 176 townhouse toritsin March, 1978. The proponent at that time was Gerald • Pautz, who was unable to develop the project as approved. The current owners request a change to allow single family development. LAND USE The 1979 Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts the 40 acres proposed for develop- ment as medium density residential. This, however, reflects to actual zoning at the property. The 1968 Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts the area as low density residential. The zoning to allow 176 units on 40 acres was accoraplished through the PUD process, taking into account that the developer's gross acreage was 120. The existing zoning is RM 6.5, with R1-22 to the west, R1-13.5 to the south, Flood Plain and R1-22 to the cast, and the Hidden Glen single family PUD to the north. According to the Shoreland Management Ordinance Purgatory Creek is designated 'General Development Waters'. Lots abutting with public sewer and water must be 13,500 sq. ft. minimum size, 90 feet minimum width and the structure setback 100' from the Ordinary High Miter Hark. This pro- posal moots those restrictions. In addition, the subdivision will be less than 30`:', impervious surface. • ( The Flood Plain Ordinance requires 100' setback from the creek. The project conforms with this and no lot lines or filling are proposed within the Flood Plain. Memo-Edengate Single Family -2- October 24, 1980 {" The Purgatory Creek Conservancy line runs at about the 910 contour on the site. However, the previous development approved encroached into the large Conservancy Area to the east to a greater degree than the current proposal. Dell Ruad, which was put under construction by the City two years ago has also been moved further west, because of suil problems. The single family lots adjacent to the creek will present much less of a mass visual intrusion on the creek than the original ruw townhouses. The current proposal is an improvement on the existing approval, and is reasonable when you consider 2/3 of the developer's property will be dedicated to the City. EXISTING SITE: CHARACTER The 40 acres of the site proposal for development has a general mass land form as a hill, rising from a low elevation of about 800 to the top of the hill (wrhich is roughly in the center of the 40 acres) to an elevation of 938 (almost 60 feet). • Purgatory Creek rings the development on the south and east. Dell Road, is currently under construction by the City in the location shown on the Preliminary Plat. In the north central portion of the plat (Block 1, Lots 2, 3, & 4) a low wet area spills into the property. This is not classified as wetlands or public waters by the Department of Natural Resources. However, in order to build, filling will have to occur on the front portion of the lot and special consideration should be given regarding protection from subsurface water. • • Along the western edge of the plat, south of Harrogate Drive and, slightly west of the proposed north/south extension of Harrogate, is a major drainage swale. The proposed grading plan does not make provision for preparation of lots, however, this swale will have to be filled and the drainage moved to the back of lots 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5, Block 2. The major existing vegetation on the site occurs on the very northwestern and southwestern corners. This will not be significantly altered. The balance of the site is meadow and corn • field. Two areas are proposed for development east of Dell Road. The northern • area is planned for five lots off of a cul-de-sac, each well over one acre in size. The land form upon which these five lots are to be situated is a hill 25 feet high. It is a natural extension of the more major hill, projecting into the flood plain at a wide point. 1 The southern area presents the following problems for development: 1) It • is much closer in elevation to the Floodplain than the northern hill. Vis- ually it appears more as part of the Conservancy Area. 2) Two lots are proposed, accessing directly onto Dell Road, which will function as a • • collector. 3) Projection of homes in this area occurs at one of the nar- rowest: points of the Conservancy Area. There are no braves directly east across the creek. These lots are a clear intrusion into the Conservancy Area in a sensitive visual location and should be eliminated. • • 2) • • 4iemo--Cdengate Single family -3- October 24, 1980 • ORDINANNCE PLOWIREMENTS • The' proposed plat meets the minimum lot size requirements for the R1-13.5 zone. The frontages, in most cases, are at least 100 feet. The center cul-de-sac is almost 700' long. Ordinance WW93 limits cul-de-sacs to 500'. SITE PLAN ilie trading Plan is not completely representative of development other than streets. When you consider that, in relationship to the street, homes are most normally set on a lot so that they are slightly higher than the street. This prevents water from draining into the garage and assures .• access to the sewer. It most normally presents a streetscope of home fronts rather than roofs. • Since there is a 30' setback from the road right of way, if a home is placed on a down hill lie, the front yard is usually filled. Although the pads are not depicted in this fashion, the developer would have more buildable lots if the pads were prepared in rough fashion at this time. The same is true of the up-hill lots. A tuck under house can usually only ac- commodate about a 6 foot rise in elevation from the street and 8 across the house to the back. Lots 36, 37, 38, & 39 Block 2, have more than 20' of rise to accommodate. Because of the southwest orientation, innovative architecture could take advantage of this, but a traditional home would require extensive retaining walls. The transition between the larger single family lots to the west and the smaller lots proposed should be accomplished by matching lots, lot line for lot line in the existing subdivision with the new abutting proposal. TRANSPORTATION The auto circulation proposed is poor. The project should be altered by: 1. Extending the central cul-de-sac along the 920 contour toward the • west to connect with Harrogate Drive. 2. The northern entrance should be moved south to align and make a full intersection with Dell Road and the cul-de-sac to the east. 3. A separate southern entrance to Dell Road should be added and graded to assure proper sight lines. This entrance will provide quicker • access to Dell Road for over half of the subdivision. - 4. Eliminate the two lots on the east side of Dell Road with access directly to Dell Road. There will be a bike trail and pedestrian trail along Dell Road. • RFCO1RP:ROATIONS he 1'lanninq Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat and rezoning from RN 6.5 to R1-13.5 subject to the following: 1. A revised grading and,development plan must be submitted to the City prior to final plat approval. znyO I _ Memo-Edengate Single family -4- October 24, 1980 2. The plat is to be modified to include road changes as outlined in this report, and the two lots east of Dell Road are to be eliminated. 3. The plat shall be further modified to match lots on the western boundary. 4. The developer must submit for review and approval, a grading and sedimentation, and erosion control plan to the Watershed District. CE:ss 26gI -" • . . - 0 ( 0 1 1 i ..."..1.6-cs...Tp,I1 tla.V11-100.741,41.11.411.47.11in nvervgl.. ....411=1,11271atlet t';-1 A-LA:Wor•••,"n11-PC.W.1-44.1.1;.61,0•1.10 VA I I 11\ . I I ; F '. 1 .1. . - A L : , .. .1 . \ .-- \., . . \ .. .-..:. ./ — 0 , I 1 r .,.. '''---- -- --'' '• \ ... ‘..., ,/ , / --.1 7---..,..... ._,..... RE.i.Licli,;,, \(, \..___,L_ I . •- • -. ... .1•. :::,.............., —.7,1".... . :.. '.1111 . --\ . .. •7----....--L...----I L"--—:"i.. . 11,. 1------ ... ,..-,..........1.•;',....;''.. • 'N''- 1 \ . ;. / . ':'';. .17...."''''''il ;. ...''',': ........- ....-..':'•....., :. . '11 '•,••• •••••••:....,..',..2..\'. . . .• . / : ...---:_-_:-- . .- ...... . ..:..--:.:..---. --.'..s: ••il 1---- .. E 7.1E N'D C UL'r ri E- C'''',..."' • ..-: 2..„.-(4.2 . I . 11.. .i.c. .,,,,,. ...:,......:..........„..... ..„,(.•.:.. :.if, . 4, .: .....-......:....:,.......-...-..........::. .......:-.....,....g ,7-.. ... ' ...,_..__.1--. ..... : , b ,I,:r . • ...:: ...... ..,..'..-:::..,..'::......... •......-....:.::.:i .,-----"'". ' 1 , ,...._ _:.... . _..-----—4.. , li ......,,,a, marmsauss ra 1,-.vasmd 1 *..- ...' ; ' ,....—......_-t --": ;. 'TT . . .:., :. . ..- ' !! \3 I -.---- -i..._.. _:.,..1. . . 1 t---./ ! 1 .. '... .:-...... . . .: . -- s , 1-.....1......:1 A TCO LOTS ,--•-----f‘'.'.,-t \ . -•• .. - ! . • 4 ip ... ------1.--..-----1 ' .1. ....':(---1,. •• 7-777. ...; B I) i e f p- ..... . . \:;:--:%3 , -.')--,. ' ‘... ' .. ....-•'-li 0 '',...,./.7....-.'---"'". ..,,,,'-' '''.--1/ .. ' / .‘"-) ' ''', . 0 p ii..:.: . •• ..-..-^". ,/,!::..-2 I : ---4 DD A CC F SS fi -..,. - ' :-.."-- '' / . .`•-...„1: i . . ..:. . ') N7, X -'..-.'"7--:;:. '/ ''''7--- :" - \.:... '`, s 1.,131.1.l:.:.• .....s.... v . ....,..,if fi ,' . r .....),,,, - . .......„. it ,i 4jel.---— .•„, ... :,.,,,,:--•-,-.. -.--......-•••.,.^...--",-^":*"''7"-.Y-.----/-..---/..'---..c . • '--`;'-----.;tk. I . .'• :4?* 4 , 43''s' , ' .. 00 % 1%, I .P .....;, '. ....., •:• 44 kt.....,.) 7 I i ,. ''`r.. k, . ( \. -- 'rt, I .. ‘ ' 7 .% .:5 .,..,.... ...- , .4.,,.,,o,,,,,,„..1' % i I 1 1 e .....-...ik rq -„,....._ -.\ \--- •----- 1 ' \ I h 7 _ Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Unapproved Commission November 3, 1980 Members absent: Gloria Pond, Larry VanMeter B. Reports of Staff 1. Development Pronosal -Edenpate Single Family Jaius Nelson was present representing Knutson Architeots. lie dereribod the project vs 83 single family units on a 120 acre site. 80 aom s of the site will be land dedication. • Nelson said the Planning Commission has requested road aocess on to Dell Road from the cast, and, not to allow Harrogate Drive to extend through to the west (put a cul-de-sac in). Anderson asked if any of the proposed lots on Block 3 are in the floodplain and Nelson replied no. • Lambert said there are 9 lots on the south side of the site within the conservancy area. He said, however, that Staff can rationalize the lots in the conservancy area because of the 80 acre park dedi- . cation and the low density type of development being proposed. Anderson asked if any of the dedicated park land on this site is buildable property. Lambert replied possibly some of the high areas could be picnic area and/or ballfields, but about 90A will be left as wildlife sanctuary. Tangen asked if there is a park planned along Duck Lake Trail per the Cuideplan. Lambert said there is a neighborhood park planned just north of this site. In light of that, said Tangen, perhaps Harrogate Drive should go through to provide access to the park from this site (or at least pedestrian access if not oar access). NOTION: Tangen moved to table the Edengate Development Proposal to the next meeting so Commission members have adequate opportunity to review the proposal. Breitenstein seconded the motion and it oarried unanimously. • 270 MEIKODU@I ( TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: October 30, 1980 ' SUBJECT: Development Proposal Check List PROJECT: Edengate Single Family PROPONENT: Catco, Inc. REQUEST: Rezone LID acres from RN fi.' to R1-11 r, anti preliminary platting-o.-83-•— single family lots. LocATiON: In the Northw :._ corner of the City_ bordered on theSputb_by_Elurk 'Ake_ Trail, on the WeD: See stibyng ,t1 : Reportexisting dLochanburn subdivision and on the east by Brul'ydtory Creek. PARK AND RECREATION PLANTING CONCERNS ' 1. Type of development: Single Family 2. Number of units in residential. development: 83 S. Number of acres in the project: 12n 4. Special recreation space requirements: None S. Adjacent to any existing or proposed parks: Edenbrook Open Space Area (116 acre open space corridor between Dell Rd. and Duck Lake Rd.) a. Affect on the park: Thic development t.nll provi4a-mar-e—} ensure for develop- ment of this Olen space area. 6. Need fora mini park:_ NO 7. Cash park fee or land de, :,tiont 80 acres of land dodiratien a. If Cash park fee dedication, amount based on existing ordinance will total: (j/A b. If park land dedication, the number of acres to be dedicated is 80 acres c. Existing or pending assessments or taxes on proposed park property total not broken dDlwn) and will be paid prior to dedication. 8. Adjacent to existing or proposed trails: 8' asphalt hikeway adjarent to fel.l_Rrt.sd a. •Type of trails Pedestrian and Bicycle Trails b. Construction Material Bituplinous ' c. Width of trail 8'. d._Party responsible for construction City q. Landownership of trail location:(dedicatcd, purchased. Rohr) Right-of-flay NATURAL.RESOURCE PRESERVATION CONCERNS 1. Site grading plan considers natural amenities of the altei_1(1 SinUifirant natural :UaCll_L,t_tCS will he affected gdepthsseveral as._her.Ltllcl•e f 2. Host significant cut and fill on tbo alto aro:Thr'rt. are SCV 1'r arP are ten or twelve foot cuts for locating roads within.She_alat. TIIe_linst• significant Till areas include about 20' of fill in the southwest corner, north of the proposed through street. • • • 27W 3. Significant vegetntion on the site includes: The only vegetation on the site are wooded arras in thr e1'trrme cn ithwrct und_lrpal 4. The site grading plan indicates preservation of:N/A ' s. Adjacent to public waters, Purgatory Creek runs through the site a. Affect on waters: Nn significant affert nn thr watrrc REFERENCE CHECK • 3. Major Center Arca Study: See Planning Staff Report 2. Neighborhood Facilities Study: This neighborhood would be served by the Proposed Duck Lahe Park located to the northwest of this site. 3. Purgatory Creek Study:See Planning Staff Report 4. Shoreland Management Ordinance: See Planning Staff Report s. Pioodplain Ordinance: See Planning Staff Report • {_ 6. Guide Plan: See Plano g Staff Report 7. Other N/A REcowil mnTiaus 3. Adjacent neighborhood type, and any neighborhood opinion voiced in favor or opposed to the project: 2. pinnnieg Commission Recommendation: The Planninn Commission recomaended not to allow Harrogate Drive to extend through to the west, and approved this proposal on a 4-2 vote. The two absenti g votes felt that Harro ato Drive sjlnuldl r miens to west. 3. Community Services Staff Recommendations: Community Services Staff recommends approval of the plat and rezoning as per the Planning Staff recommendations in the October 24 report with the followinn addition: 5. The daeloper shall pe e:ci the City with a warranty deed for the 80 f acres free and clear of all taxes and assessments prior to final plat approval. 2?'I • • November,1980 MINNFSOTA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.COUNCIL ENV1kO17:1EUTA1, A3sEr,st•n!:T WeRF:SIn:RT (EAW) MU NOP]s:E :ir FJNtIINZS.. •• DO NOT WRITE IN TI1IS SPACE E.R. # • • NOTE: The purpose of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) is to provide inforration on a project so that one can assess rapidly whether or not the project requires an Environmental Impact Statement. Attach additional •pages, c,earts, traps, etc, as needed to answer these questions. Your answers should be as spacific as possi:,le. Indicate tahieh answers are estimated. SUMMARY A. ACTIVITY FINDING BY RESPONSIULE AGENCY (PERSON) fX 17egative Declaration (No EIS) EIS Preparation Notice (EIS Required) B. ACTIVITY IDENTIFICATION • 1. Project name or title EDENGATE SINGLE FAMILY 2. Project proposer(s) Catco, Inc. Address 7400 Metro Blvd. Edina, MN 55435 • Telephone Number and Area Code ( 612) 835-7277 3. Responsible Agency or Person •City of Eden Prairie • Address 8950 Eden Prairie Road, Eden'Prairie, MN 55344 • • Perron in Responsible Agency (Person) to contact for further information on this EAW: _ Chris Enger • Telephone 937-2262 4. This EAW and other supporting documentation are available for public in- spection andjor copying at: Location 8950 Eden Prairie Road • Telephone 937-2262 Hours 8am - 4:30 pm 5. Reason for EAW Preparation Petition C3 other 1•] XX Mandatory Category -cite (•50 or more units WC rule number(s) C. ACTIVITY IM:SCRIPTION SU!iWRY • 1. rrojcct luL t.)On Countyllennepin City/Torn=:hih name Eden Prairie Township number, 116 (North), Range Number 22 Fast or West (circle one), Section number(s) 6 Street address (if In city) or legal descriptions l 110I r y [ .., b r{ I v! 0� r.� owi •rs . , „, i „ ., ., ......).---777%-/..,..- 4,,4 ,, i ;L.:—(41.'",..' ;� _is4� i} _s �- !• —y r • i ..i1 f .I j ^, ; s J _... y } : t 1 * �- �a +,d aj I S `Fr )r ' . `c . _' e , t ' .. . 11 — li 4.7,f;-± -7-1-1...: ,..,,,,,,,.,,,j, ,-..r ,--1., :..,,,i _,...... 6 . 1 r.- a �r�x5 11 k�•f�...J . 'Y, ' �'//� i rr--}-,�r' r`}7 sIN,. v, e • ,` '; E ti. 3£ 1#-441 7 — /: ;ram- � II al^rw _Ijll '4 -Z,.ft ••c'S dW 1• r �l r r ,. 'ii j1 I 9( 'i f "l s " """'�C..�.,II Ili i- i . , \,}A2. ;Y i a i. eft;. :t' ^� r •{_ 7` 1 • , .._,,-..-7--ti.7:--„ \oy, + `,1 1 0 ,....e., . ,,. .„ , , ." F , j —r 1 \ i x r o J 6 —` .. , .., •0. ... '/ . •• •C.-) ,, `,,'. •1 V.";k \•;:t.7•••',7-' •';•: .; I' / i'• ,/ '.••'. •.t •.>:: ' `f i., ;...,:_4...,._..I•'...• ,I . • // i, • '•\•• 1 /. i .' . i ' . :' • •: . •, Swilt.Point Grandview, ,4. .----.- , ''....1'• l. / .,;`,1 / •,I , 1 7:-..,POirl I ;' 11)ce.)11.0,en . I 1,., , _...... , I •. .••• ' ' •1"i'. 1.t. •'... .... 7'.' s / 0 ) •• ;, •."• • :I 1 1 44. ' ./ 11. .•/ I..•••: •:••••:::‘1.• ..• •••••• ,.,'S / i•• . . . I.4,-•• ., O. ... .::°:... n ( /' V ....P.• ••..'::• i't ''..l' \!' • I'I.. /' ''--'\\ ' ..‘1. • I i ?. ::' /'• •"•,• • •.: ',;! ••/ - c•—''' C 1--.Nr . •I. 2....,,, ' C‘,')\-:.,•:, ) /1::••••: / '40 ti , (\-7'1 _,11,-''''.'''r I* ; •'... t-,..•"; ,•,,' . 1,: ... P°Int\.1\•,..;:•.72,..!Y.:11',-. C,°•‘. •• \`:, I,'Aria•. it014,3 C-J.-pri .,•;''•...:,.., i,.:7-....---..2 ,.e.' . , •- . •'•'--\ I'—:.\-.-17--,u.'?":.r.....":----11. '-'•/ I'- • \,-..*PY ..... *s. '.."--j. t. , /...', 5 It'.:...' '/ 00...,••> . - \c"---) .1 , , ;7 ,'• z.(6!t---., • • .'\\_ .:, JA .... . •. ....i. . •, ',. ... _ - OM' - ''- .' ' N*.,:..:•*•-• 3.....--,12:, • .i.J — — ' — ..... . . I." ';'...: L 1 .' ,(,,. .- ./••• • i • ...1•\%().' -- (11).N?' 4/, . •x 44:4,' ' ',, - ': -} G--) ...i••• .-- i. - C.'-').'-'-':-\• ' 1- =-;•:, /f'.' . . .•.y.iii;am i, , . 1 -ci -g• . ., : - i- - ,,,.t:;••••••.• . .-T7x -•.-' • . •,, (.94:.‘ ) 1: .:i-• l '-- ---1.-',--•••<!'• •••••• • • • C'';-. .:\ • . -'\•••'' ) .• •/4• 1 •Gr•I'..Zo...d,•_•.•.i.i.•.7,,i\,_ -....-.:".I•••,:.A'•','".•'.*..7•••.-.„''..t,, ,I •••:/,.).,7.•-i.'•f-Il,‘,.,•‘,...,-.--••.).,-,-)•,"./••Tl,j.—• 7.i: ti:t.r.......--.1..:..'-,I4,.'.":7•) ‘ ';*•.:-' • '_'.'•,0 „enwoit _ 3 . MiNN TO—NA c f, . l'l; _•-.„,.N,. .•'ff':;.' • ),•-••6 •••-..'•••:• ••''c•-•-, •: c• r.\9-',1-)1-:.1-• --.fj-•''''.1 I ' .' ••• .\ \ -"; - r*' ,- ' l'' 1,-,/i....... ..":,/ 7.. • • .'. t.. z:, •,..,7,. • .' -;;ii ...--__-__') ';':,••,' r' •,'••••- ,ye ,,:),-.., • .•:• i .? ....,..r., /...' 1;;::••I:'•••• --.., N...' •••• . ci.•.)\'')I.'•<`'.. ), •. ..sil...-',;1,..-... .1 ''`."-.•.' •••-2.--- -- D,I;i:,,, ..;,. ,, ,, ,''. :',•--,-,"...••••,...:h:.•...- .,••:-.1•..\-,':',J.• -./.2 .) '0%.„..„;„..1: j-1 .',.-.... ( .7.-,t,..."....-:.._,t...!...".'.,...;•., d.:""t" • '--' / '.'- '.• ' ..--.SN •.1- ..c: • ..?„...\..:1.,;-•...-'•._ III,"olt;• .1::::.:, :.t/6)•:,•",•••• :,7 / . .. . - ......„:\ ,...... / -----1 ,, ."2'. .. I• ° ---- ' .1:47 . `• -***` 'i: '-'\ , . - •',.. ."' '(,..., . •0. t. . . !..: .1., , .. , 4..i ._ •.......itiviO ‘...,. ..1, . i: "l':).) . ' '‘... ' •.( .', ! .. .'7.-'.: ....... •.* *.:. , a ' ;. .."' ' ''..'' 9 ‘ - • - . ' ' I.• \ \!---* , ' .. • . . • .• • . ' .. .• • :'":. .. • . .• ‘1 IS.; St A lba its Ba y ..,'„ , ,:-,..,,c-..T,,P.....,...ter ,,,,.. .,,,, il 0 , , _. _ .. 01,,,,, - , ,. 7.,..'_.„,‘ , . ,' ". 1,"°.--271 '..' ,-;-,`'• N-KL.-tf'1' -r,-,_'';AS/ .:-.....„ ! ,,, ...:- .,._- -.----.- ) w ,'iirsurreclicl Cult/ - •1. ''..,,,- -,- - •-*- .:: -''-.023--",i . - ' 7.!'/'''... 4>-: •( '.• clini)'‘'•-•\' ‘ < )-1-Y`6 ('\IJr'''-`- '• - ---- - - - 1.i''•N -•; -Z.----.;•••/- • • •••- ---.:7:...-:. 0 _ ., ./- -:',„0Th....,.• - _ •'-' '.'t ' ...-.z.....-.3,„..../In...,i:••••..:,..;•!,.•.,",7*.:,•,, ,. , "•, ..-.\ .-- ..-.-----_-.=\/-if. .7.••-•',..•'. ..0 . • :- , .72 - - .J: - •-•7 ";•:..•.•:'- •."4- • -..• . • '`. : ,- ... 1 "..."-•..,....1-71...,- , .1 , ... 1.. ' i• • • Clear Spring,P: ' . . ,„ , , Dsq:, 4.• . .,.:..' -:.„:. ,, 1 ., ,l'••, , .. ' f ''..a.?..: ....,---- - (;‘,- ' \,) • \ NP / " "'• N S). .-...... -,--':•1'cl- ', ..../ -' - -.... .. , -.--•;,1--- .••••••;;;',s-tec-7-•,. ‘‘.:., . .-; '...- //,/ •--).. -,---- I i•..,:••••• ')1 0.\-)..--0• ".•'.:7'• \.c• 1„,-•••".. .;.f•k• ‘' e t' 4'' ', ;iv./ ../-& / c-), : ,•:-..:t. 1 ,.. (.,.- .,t - --, •.'• • •• • -' • • /,','7. /r',' V/ . .. 0 • -•, ,.: .... ; '' ,••• • '-..\. '' ...". "`'• if,'4/ {:,--- Doo j,,. . . ',., 0 - / • \ '• N ... ....- 1„,>:. .1- c--) • ..,I1 ''-,.--1• ', • („ ' I" '. 'C' - j ..\. ,; ) 0•'', (> /./ ,Z,,'(--- . \.;ii :.....'.•,^Z : '\ C.-'N, JO-_ -`\., .. ) •-• \,..` • ',\:,.' -„,..k(i. ‘‘. 4 .. /4) , ;' ,.,, 1 J...- .„-......-1,,, '•'\V„---,- ')'-';',.„ .X., 1 rz:-...0 , I 117 s. •,,. • . X, . ", ." • *A .--V—, :. ••• •\• ,P!.1. /e'j ,', _LE,,,.."... .• 111•11.,,11\1011.1 11.:(:(1,..;' . ..,....).....-....-..••,•'-.-t---I— • , !,,••••• :• -•1•-•..'•' •-•-Q--•-...•..\-_.). ,.‘••/•...s:•)•.-•‘--- ; !.I•..f;•(.1'Li,••.•,.,,k-.'--•• .N.-..7, --'•• -. -- o .--,• -v\. • ° ) 1, .• ' cf.5'. ---...\-- --• ..' `--) •-.':,''•••-::„n 'R -\•s, ? -..•—•-r —..7- -4,"4). ' .1, ).\ `,_, ,..•-•-\-,- , • / ; (' , 's .0 •• 6 " ,,..•;:i :, ';,.,1 V.,,, , . ''-' \,t"---% . .';` . M \..) . ..e, ;/:••• (...• '' . edengate . ., :1 ,... .),....„,, ‘:.:.\..,....6'..-) 7-7 ;1. ., .,.. (,., : : I ''t '' c\ '1 .. F ' •.( • cf — ''.' '''• ('::. ) \ 1 : '3",:tI.i.l. :1,.I,l' I, A I II I • t . \I •:, \• -)• .*: '...••\ ',... 1.•,_/. ,'(''', ) •,• -,...._. i, ...,- ,1,.)., . _./ .. ..,.• 1. ; 1 . .. ' - •• "-•`---s.'..16:••••s‘•2,,, ';'• - ,•„, • ''\- 1 , •-:\i/ • •• ''' . , . .‘f •1,_.,,,..0 7 - .... . ..b......! . EXCEISIOR, MINN. f.•:::•,.,...\ e., .79 ,....,:, ,,,,. .....,L!.) 1) ..... ..,,, NIA I An! 1,11,11,,N,A 0. l:1111i1.1%,1 I V., i 1 ...fi., ( *'......". . s!N) /';(•,...../ ••••••.•,!.. '. ... I 310/7 t. • • .'' 0,„ )..-\•-••••\ eItIox`I'M 1 '••• . I . ••,. • 2••,• .1'.. 1 ' •'•••.• .... ., c. - . ....... - .. ,... 1 r 4' a �r ( I TrTTT� , { r r, r ( , L... . r ...,—.4‘., ! ______J J -- __...._ , . ..e.,),_ _ __ . : D "" .� B • y __ I_ t --- V E a --: --s-- ../", ,L7i1 , ;-----1 , ,, • \ ,,,,,, ... 70/<"\--:- IN G..�' 404 i..//,, ,, sx. - -\.- .......... ...I% j ---\, --- . y r S . ..._ 3____ ,,____f___...._.____\z,j , .., ,,,,,•:: ( _•,_\ • 2. Type and scope'of•proposed project: Single family detached housing plat. Minimum size 13,500 sq. ft. per lot upon 42 acres and 78 acres of dedicated open space. 3. Estimated starting date (month/year) December, 1980 4. Estimated completion date (month/year)Construction of homes will continue over approx- imately three (3) years. •5. Estimated construction cost $1,000,000 6. List any federal funding involved and known permits or approvals needed from each unit of government and status of each: • Unit of Government Name or Type of Permit/Approval Status (federal, state, or Federal Funding regional, local) • • City of Eden Prairie zoning and platting pending Riley-Purgatory • Watershed District land alteration permit pending • 7. If federal permits, funding or approvals are involved, will a federal EIS be prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act? NO YES X UNKNOWN II. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION • A. Include the following maps or drawings: • 1. A map showing the regional location of the project. 2. An original aA x 11 section of a U.S.G.S. 711 minute, 1:24,000 scale map with the activity or project area boundaries and site layout delineated. Indicate quadrangle sheet name. (Original U.S.G.S. sheet must be main- tained by Resro nsible Agency; legible copies may be supplied to other EAW distribution points.) 3. A sketch map of the site showing location of structures and including • significant natural features (water bodies, roads, etc). 4. Current photos of the site must be maintained by the Responsible Agency. Photos need not be sent to other distribution points. • • B. Present land use. 1. Briefly describe the present use of the site and lands adjacent to the site. The site is presently undeveloped. Surrounding areas consist of single family lots to the Uest and South, planned residential and open space to the North, and a City road under construction to the East. 2. Indicate the approximate acreages of the site that are: (44 developable acres) a. Urban developed 0 acres f. Wetlands (Typo III, IV, V) 0 acres (none in the 44 acres to be developed) b. Urban vacant 0 acres' g. Shoreland 3 acres ( C. Rural developed 0 acres h. Floodplain 1.5rcreu . d. Rural vacant 44 acres i. Cropland/Pan lure land 8 acres corn planted in 1980 but not previously r • o. De a gnat.cd Rccrc-1.a acres j. Forested 4 acres ation/Oren ;mace Flood Plain area f r r 3. List names and sizes of lakes, rivers and streams on or near the site, i particularly lakes within 1,000 feet and livers and streams within k 300 feet. 1' Purgatory Creek borders the site along its southeast'side. v. C. Activity Description 1. Describe the proposed activity, including staging of development (if any), operational characteristics, and major types of equipment and/or pro- • cesses to be used. Include data that would indicate the magnitude of the proposed activity (e.g. rate of production, number of customers, tons of raw materials, etc). The project will consist of 83 single family detached housing units . built over a three (3) year period. • • 2. Fill in the following where applicable: ( a. Total project area 44 •acres g. Size of marina and access NA sq.• ft. or channel (water area) Length NA miles h. rVehic.ular traffic trips Am0 generated per day 83 b. Number of housing or i. Number of'employees recreational units 83 C. Height of structures 25 ft. j. Water supply needed 20,ThQ.2a1/da Source: Municipal water d. Number of parking spaces NA k. Solid waste requiring • disposal jQ_tons/yr e. Amount of dredging NA cu. yd. • • 1. Commercial, retail or • f. Liquid wastes requir- industrial floor space NA sq. ft. ing treatment 24.OQS1,gal/da • III. ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT • A. SOILS AND 'f01'OCRAT'llY 1. gill the project be built in an area with slopes currently No X Yes exceeding 12t? 2. Are there ether geologically unstable areas involved in the }project, YES such as fault ::ones, shrink-swell soils, peatlandS, or sinkholes? X NO 3. If yes on 1 or 2, describe slope conditions or unstable area and any measures to be used to reduce potential adverse impacts. The site includes some existing slopes up to 35% - 40%. • • 4. Indicate suitability of site soils-for foundations, individual septic systems, and ditching, if these arc included in the project. Alluvial fill - - Adequate conditions for house foundations. r , 5. Estimate the total amount of grading and filling which will be done: • 37,500 cu. yd. grading37,500 cu. yd. filling What percent of the site will be so altered? 35 t 6. What will be the maximum finished slopes? 30 t 9. Valat steps will be taken to minimize soil erosion during and after construction? A soil erosion control plan will be reviewed and approved by the • Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District. On-site inspections will be conducted by City and Watershed Staff. • B. VEGETATION 1. Approximately what percent of the site is in each of the following vegetative types: • Woodland 9 e Cropland/ 18 % • Pasture Brush or shrubs - e !larch 9 % • ._ Grass or herbaceous 64 .e Other - { (Specify) • only isolated trees 2. itow many acres of forest or woodland will lie cleared, if any? acres 3. Are there any rare or endangered plant species or areas of unique botanical or biological significance on the site? (See DNR publication • The Wncoms.on Ones.) X NO YES Icr-ycs,T:t the spocies or area and indicate any measures to be used to reduce potential adverse impact. C. FISH AND WILDLIFE 1. Arc there any designated federal, state or local wildlife or fish manage- ment areas or sanctuaries near or adjacent to the site? NO X YES 2. Are there any known rare or endangered species of fish and wildlife on or near the site? (See DNR publication The Uncorunon X NO _YES One..). 3. Will the project alter or eliminate wildlife or fish —NO X YES habitat? 4. If yes on any of questions 1-3, list the area, species or habitat, and indicate any measures to be used to reduce potential adverse impact on • them. The Purgatory Creek Corridor is a designated wildlife/Open space area. Construction of homes will alter the habitats of birds and small animals and tend to relocate larger animals, i.e. deer toward the creek corridor and other open space area. ,�.,,�y•j • D. HYDROLOGY 1. Will the project include any of the following: If yes, describe type of work and mitigative measures to reduce adverse impacts. • a. Drainage or alteration of any lake, pond, marsh, NO YXSX lowland or groundwater supply ._ b. Shore protection works, dams, or dikes X c. Dredging or filling operations • X - d. Channel modifications or diversions X ._� • e. Appropriation of ground and/or surface water X • f. Other changes in the course, current or cross- • X ' section of water bodies on or near the site 2. What percent of the area will be converted to new impervious surface? 15 % 3. What measures will be taken to reduce the volume of surface water run- off and/or treat it to reduce pollutants (sediment, oil, gas, etc.)? Urban runoff will be collected via municipal storn water system and carried via pipes to either one of two settling ponds located on the east side of Dell Road. After settling, water will discharge into the Purgatory Creek flood plain area. All such plans are subject to watershed district review and approval. 4. Will there be encroachment into the regional (100 year) floodplain YES oy new fill or structures? If yes, does it conform to the local floodplain ordinance? NO X YES 5. What is the approximate minimum depth to groundwater on 2 feet the site? £ . WATER QUALITY of process or cooling water, sanitary stwage 1. Will there be a dischargeYES or other waste waters to any water body or to groundwater? X NO If yes, specify the volume, the concentration of pollutants and the water body receiving the effluent. 2. If discharge of waste water to the municipal treatment system is planned, identify :any toxic, corrosive or unusual pollutants in the wastewater. None t 3. Will any sludges be generated by the proposed project? X NO __YES If yes, specify the expected volume, chemical composition and method of disposal. • • • ��� . • 4. What measures will be used to minimize the volumes or impacts identified in questions 1-3? )(ot applicable ' . • 1i 5. If the project is or includes a landfill, attach information on soil profile, depth to water table, and proposed depth of disposal. Not applicable • F. AIR QUALITY MD NOISE 1. Will the activity cause the emission of any gases and/or particulates into the atmosphere? NO X YES If yes, specify the type and origin of these emissions, indicat.! any emission control devices or measures to be used, and specify the approxi- mate amounts for each emission (at the source) both with and without the emission control measures or devices. • During construction of roads, homes, etc., air blown particulates • • • could be carried off site. In the event that blowing particulates becomes a problem, the site will be watered as necessary to contain such particulates from leaving the site. • • 2. Will noise or vibration be generated by construction and/or operation • of the project? NO X YES If yes, describe the noise source(s); specify,decibel levels [da(A)J, and duration (hrs/da) for each and any mitigative measures to reduce the noise/vibration. Noise produced by construction equipment will range from 78-115 dBA at the machine and from 63-100dDA approximately 250'• from the equipment. If wind blown dust becomes a problem, the site will be watered as necessary. Normal exhaust and noise of earth moving and construction equipment will be present during the construction phases. After completion, exhaust and noise from the estimated 830 3.auit automobile trigsiil peciPyewhtA er. any areas sensitive to noise or reduced air quality-(hospitals, elderly houuing, wilderness, wildlife areas, residential developments, etc.) are in the affected area and give distance from source. • Residential areas, 150' to west and 200' to south will he aware of construction noise. Hours of equipment operation will be limited to 8am - 6pm. G. LAND RESOURCE CONSERVATION, ENERGY 1. Is any of the site suitable for agricultural or forestry production or currently in such use? X NO YES If yes, specify the acreage involved, type and volume of marketable crop or wood produced and the quality of the land for such use. . 2. Are there any known mineral or peat deposits on the site? X NO YES If yes, verify the type of deposit and the acrenoc. • 2264 3, Will tho project result in an increased-energy demand? NO X YES Complete tho following as applicablet ' 4,. a. Energy requirements (oil, electricity, pas, coal, solar, etc.) • Estimated Peal: Demand Annual (Nonrl%or l.:i)v) Anticipated Firm Contract or Type Recuiry nt Strr..er Wintrr Suph)ier Interru?tible Basis? .16 HCF/ .19 b1CF/ Nat. Gas 9690 (ICF U/day U/dav jlinnegasco Firm Electric 48,460 kwh 3.3 kwh 2.2 kwh NSP Firm b. Estimate the capacity of all proposed on—site fun' storage. • • • None • • c. Estimate annual energy distribution fort { 4 space heating 50 i ighting 10 '< air conditioning 30 4 processing 15 ventilation 5 t . d. Specify any major energy conservation systems and/or equipment incorporated into this project. All homes will meet or exceed State Energy Codes. Some homes may incorporate alternative energy sources such as solar power. e. What secondary energy use effects may result from this project . p (e.g. more or longer car trips, induced housing or businesses, etc1P d t None • H. OPEN sP7 cr/seem ATION 1, Are there any dasignated federal, state, county or local recreation or open ::pace are;,s near the site (including wild and scenic rivers, trails, lake accesses)? NO X YES If yes, list areas by nar,e and explain how each may be affected by the project. Indicate any measures to be used to reduce adverse impacts. Purgatory Creek Floodplain area. No adverse affects are anticipated. The development plan conforms to the Purgatory Creek Study. (_ U. T17,;:SPOPTATIO;1 proposed transportation systems 1. will the project affect any existing or i r , NOo X jet (highw.ry, railroad, water, airport, etc)? YES If•yes, specify which part(s) of the system(s) will be affected. rur these, specify existing use and capacities, average verae traffic tspy d and be h w 1' percentage of truth: traffic (if iinhway); ,ndcindicc indicate o f truth: yrwillc, affected by the project (e.g. congestion, safety, increased traffic (tUr), access requirements). The approximate 830 additional automobile trips generated daily will not Dell(toad a affect the re presently undergoing roadways mpr improvements. Duck Lake Trail and • 2. Is mass transit available to the site? ^X NO YES 3. What measures, including transit and paratransit services, are planned to reduce adverse impacts? MTC park-n-ride sites will be added as ridership numbers warrant and )ITC policy allows. . • • J. PLANNING, LAND USE, COi 1UNITY SERVICES comprehensive 1. Jr the project consistent with local and/or regional compreh eh X YES plans? If not, explain: If a zoning change or special use permit is necessary, indicate existing zoning and change requested. change • wouldrbee to singler rfamily detached housing, R1.13.5. zoning 2. Will the type or height of the project conflict with the character of the X NO YEWexisting neighborhood? If yes, explain and d scribe any meannrc•s to be used to reduce conflicts. 2-7 1 I. flow many employees will move into the area to be near the project? None How much new housing will be needed? ne i (' 4. Will the project induce development nearby--either support services 1I or similar developments? No If yes,explai.n type of development and specify any other counties and municipalities affected. 5. Is there sufficient rapacity in the following public services to handle , the project and any associated growth? Amount required public Service for project Sufficient caa.,city? water 24,000 gal/da .cruise included in Devel. (Yes) wastewater treatment 20,000 gal/da " (Yes) sewer 4,580 feet a II I. I. (Yes) 110 pupils aI. if (Yes) schools , solid waste disposal 12.5ton/no Existing Pick-up f+ Disp. SYStem (Yes) streets 1 miles planned • other (police, fire, etc) 1.2 officers/1000 planned If current major public facilities are not adequate, do existing local . plans call for expansion, or is expansion necessary strictly for this one project and its associated impacts? 6. Is the project within a proposed or designated Critical Arca or part of a Related Actions EIS or other environmentally sensitive planlS or program reviewed by the ISQC? X NO If yes, specify which area or plan. 7. Will the project involve the use, transportation, storage, release or dis,'o`;al of ;otrat1a1ly ha:ardoo^ or tc,xic 11.1uid::, solids on gaseous substances such as pesticides, radioactive wastes, poi.uions, ( No YES etc? • If yes, please specify the substance:and rate of usage and any measures to be taken to minimise adverse environmental impacts•from accidents. q 2163 , • • • r 0. When the project has served its useful'life, will retirement of the 1 X NO YES facility rcauiro sl.ccial measures or plans? If yes, specify: r • • • K. HISTORIC RESOURCES 1. Are there any structures on the site older than 50 years or on federal ' or state historical registers? X NO YES 2. Have any arrowheads, pottery or other evidence of prehistoric or early settlement been found on the site? X NO YES Night any known archaeologic or paleontological sitebe OaffectedS - . . by the activity? _ • • 3. List any site or structure identified in 1 and 2 and explain any impact on them. • Project area will be reviewed by State Historical Society via the EAW process. • L. OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS Describe any other major environmental effects which may not have been identified in the previous sections. • None 1 1 III. OTHER MITIGATIVE MEASURES Briefly describe mitigative measures proposed to reduce or eliminate potential adverse impacts that have not been described before. • • 9lKiA r i V. FINDINGS hn project is a private ( ) governmental ( X ) action. The Responsible Agency ' (Person), after consideration of the information in this CAW, and the factors in Minn. Reg. r:EQC 25, makes the following findings. 1. The project is ( ) is net ( X ) a major action. State reasons: • 2. The project does ( ) does not () have the potential for significant • envirarnental effects. . 'State reasons: • • • • 3. (For private actions only.) The project is ( ) is not ( ) of more than local significance. • State Reasons: • • • • IV. CONCLUSIONS AND CERTIFICATION NOTE; A Negative Declaration or EIS Preparation Notice is not officially filed until the date of publication of the notice in the EQC Monitor section of the Minnesota State register. Submittal of the RAW to the EQC constitutes a request for publication of notice in the EQC Monitor. , A. I, the undersigned, am either the authorized representative of the responsible. Agency or the responsible Person identified below. Based on the above. findin 'r, the responsible Agency (Person) makes the following conclusions, (Complete either 1 or 2). 1. X NECATIVE DEcr.ARJTION NOTICE No EIS is needed on this project, because the project is not a major action and/or does not have the potential for significant environmental effects and/or, for private actions only, the project in not of more than local significance. • • .J • 2. EIS PREPARATION NOTICE / An 1:15 will be prepared on this project because the project is a major action and has the potential for ;igniiiennt environmental effects. f'or private actions, the project is also of more than local significance. a. The ITQC Rules provide that physical construction or operation of the project must stop when an EIS is required. In special circumstances, .the tiLdC catepecifically nuthorise limited construction to begin or continue. If you feel there are special circumstances in this • project, specify the extent of progress recommended and the reasons. • • • • b. Date Draft EIS will be submitted: • (month) (day) (year) (MEQc Rules require that the Draft EIS be submitted within 120 days of publication of the EIS Preparation Notice in the EQC Monitor. •If special circumstances prevent compliance with this time limit, a written request for extension explaining the reasons for the request must be submitted to the EQC Chairman.) c. The Draft EIS will be prepared by (list Responsible Agency(s) or Person(s)): • Signature • Roger K. Ulsted, City fanagetritie • Date B. •Attach an affidavit certifying the date that copies of this EAW were mailed • to all points on the official EQC distribution list, to the city and county . directly impacted, and to adjacent counties or municipalities likely to be directly impacted by the proposed action (refer to question III.J.4 on page 9 of the LAW'). The affidavit need be attached only to the copy of the LAW which is sent to the EQC. C. Pilling procedures for rpc Monitor Publication State agency Attach to the EAW sent to the roc a completed OSR 100 ONLY: form (Slate Register General Order Form--available at Cantral Stores). Por instructions, please contact your Agency's Liaison OtIieer to the rtat' Register or the thfice of the State Register--(h12) 2'Ju-8239. • i. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 80-232 A RESOLUTION FINDING THE ENVIRDNMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR FHNGATE SINGLE FAMILY A PRIVATE ACTION DOES UCi REQUIRE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of Eden Prairie did hold a hearing on December 2, 1980 to consider the Edengate Single Family proposal, and WHEREAS, said development is located on approximately 120 acres of land in northwestern Eden Prairie, and WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on the Edengate request and did recommend approval of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet finding of no significant impact, �- NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Eden Prairie City Council that an Environmental Impact Statement is not necessary for Edengate because the project is not a major action which does not have significant enviromental effects and is not more than of local significance. • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a Negative Declaration Notice shall be officially filed with the Minnesota Environmental Quality Council. ADOPTED, this day of , 1980. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL • 24I • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE r ; HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 80-233 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EDENGATE SINGLE FAMILY BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Edengate Single Family dated Sept. 26, 1980 , a copy of which is on file at the City Hall and amended as follows: is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie • Zoning and Platting ordinances and amendments thereto and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of , 19 �� 1 I.� Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor tl John D. Frane, City Clerk �- SEAL ' N s/ December 2, 1980 SiF OF MINNESOTA C . OF EDEN PRAIRIE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows: 3992 VOID OUT CHECK $ (68.50) 4101 MIDWWEST WINE CO. Wine 706.90 4102 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR Liquor 1,187.37 4103 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. Liquor 1,795.59 4104 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. Liquor 1,859.49 4105 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. Liquor 270.52 . . 4106 OLD P`.ORIA COMPANY, INC. Wine 487.51 4107 PAUSTIS & SONS Wine 505.56 4108 TWIN CITY WINE CO. Wine 69.80 4109 BUTCH'S BAR SUPPLY Supplies-Liquor store 195.15 4110 COCA-COLA BOTTLING MIDWEST INC Mixes 201.95 4111 BEER WHOLESALERS Beer 2,961.82 4112 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. Beer 2,263.90 4113 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO. Beer 4,073.20 4114 LEDING DISTRIBUTING CO., INC. Beer 3,552.63 4115 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO. Mixes 157.40 4116 ROUILLARD BEVERAGE CO., INC. Beer 530.56 4117 THORPE DISTRIBUTING Beer 2,521.90 4118 TAMRE O'BRIEN Instructor-Rec Dept. 400.00. ( 9 AMERICAN RED CROSS Manuals-Rec Dept. 47.50 41e0 BLUE CROSS INSURANCE Insurance 587.43 4121 HMO SERVICES Insurance 1,305.68 4122 HMO SERVICES Insurance 122.30 4123 GROUP HEALTH PLAN Insurance 1,192.20 4124 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE Insurance 380.10 4125 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN Insurance 6,122.98 4126 BUTLER PAPER Paper-Tax Increment 45.43 4127 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENG. Oues 276.00, 4128 GOLD MEDAL BEVERAGE CO. Mixes 6.08 4129 RAE 8LY Conference-Parks Dept. 68.50';. 4130 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Postage 24.1Oj 4131 TWIN CITY WINE CO. Wine 521.49; 4132 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO. Wine 194.23€ 4133 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR Liquor 644.17' 4134 OLI) PEORIA COMPANY, INC. Liquor 1,915.201 4135 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. Wine 103.53;, 4136 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. Liquor 964.391 4137 MIDWEST WINE CO. Wine 662.20 4138 MINNESOTA DISTILLERS, INC. Liquor 1,376.741 4139 MINNESOTA WINE MTRCHANTS Wine 180.01 4140 TWIN CITY PRICING & LABEL, INC. Supplies-Liquor Store 10.6Di 4141 BUTCH'S WAR SUPPLY Supplies-Liquor Store 72.0(V 4142 JOHNSON WINE CO. Wine 506.22.. 143 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE October Sales Tax 2,879.41,' i4 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Postage 173.B1 4145 FEDERAL RESERVE RANK Payroll 12,211.1( 4146 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE Payroll 9,095.90 4147 DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL Payroll 12,455.12! 4148 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE & ANNUITY Payroll 1,038.0( 71 • P.. 1.! two Lcember 2, 19B0 4149 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS Payroll 29.50 4150 PERA Payroll 9,196.81 4151 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK Payroll 150.00 4152 CURTIS MANLEY BERGQUIST Fireman 716.00 4153 LANCE BRACE Fireman 346.00 4154 DUANE J. CABLE Fireman 358.00 4155 JAMES GORDON CLARK Fireman 546.D0 4156 SPENCER LEE CONRAD Fireman 508.00 4157 WALLACE LESLIE CONRAD Fireman 274.00 4158 PATRICK STANLEY DADY Fireman 314.00 4159 LAWRENCE ALAN DOIG Fireman 382.00 4160 MICHAEL JAMES FARRELL Fireman 270.00 • 4161 JOHN KENNETH HACKING Fireman 510.00 4162 FREDRICK KARL HAFFNER Fireman 614.00 4163 STEVEN W. HAUNFELDT Fireman 270.00 4164 JOHN JOSEPH HOBBS Fireman 222.00 4165 JOHN THOMAS HOBBS Fireman 748.00 4166 GENE A. JACOBSON Fireman 1,162.00 4167 WALTER CHARLES JAMES Fireman 344.00 4168 DUANE LEWIS JOHNSON Fireman 386.00 4169 RONALD 0. JOHNSON Fireman 644.00 4( MARVIN ALLEN LAHTI Fireman 402.00 4171 MAILAND E. LANE JR. Fireman 540.00 • 4172 ROBERT PAUL LISTIAK Fireman 576.00 4173 LOWELL D. LUND Fireman 980.00 ' 4174 JAMES L. MATSON Fireman 402.00 4175 GARY LEE MEYER Fireman 164.00 4176 JOHN RAYMOND MITCHELL Fireman 230.00 4177 MARILYN FLORENCE MITCHELL Secretary-Fireman 350.00 • 4178 RAYMOND MITCHELL Fireman 1,674.00 4179 THOMAS HAMILTON MONTGOMERY Fireman 654.00' 4180 BERNARD FRANCIS NEUMANN Fireman 398.00' 4181 CURTIS REED OBERLANDER Fireman 928.00 4182 MARTIN L. PAULSEN Fireman 378.00 4183 DAVID LEE PENDERGRASS Fireman 466.00 4184 DOUGLAS LEE PLEHAL Fireman 866.00 4185 JERALD FRED PRODOEHL Fireman 576.00 4136 JOHN DAVID RIEGERT Fireman 554.00 4187 STANLEY A. RIEGERT 'Fireman 926.00 4188 JOHN DAVID ROCHFORD . Fireman 252.00 4189 MICHAEL JOHN ROGERS Fireman 338.00 4190 NORBERT HENRY ROGERS Fireman 612.00 4191 CHARLES CLARENCE SCHAITBERGER Fireman 658.00 4192 JOHN T. SCHI:IDLRICH Fireman 264.00. 4193 HARVEY HLKNAN SCHMIDT Fireman 336.00i kq4 GERALD M.ATHEW SCRWANKL Fireman 1,058.00 .,5 JOHN JOSEPH SKRANKA Fireman 622.00 4196 EUGENE RAYMOND SPANDE Fireman 402.00 4197 VERNON TIRJMAS STEPPE Fireman 510.00! 4198 BURTON LEE SUTTON Fireman 786.00 4199 MARC LEWIS TIIIELW I Fireman 838.00 4200 RICHIARI) WAYNE TURNER Fireman 396.00 : 4201 STEPHEN JOHN WHITE Fireman 664.00. .,•wJ :! • Pk three Cecember 2, 1980 4202 A & li Welding & Mfg. Co. Culvert-Park Dept. 27.00 4203 ACRO-MINNESOTA, INC. Office supplies 35.73 4204 ALL STEEL PRODUCTS CO., INC. Steel supplies-Cty Road 1 Bikeway 136.00 4205 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION Book-Water Dept. 7.00 4206 NICOLE ANDERSON Refund-Rec Dept. 2.50 4207 DON ATKINS . Mulch-Round Lake Park 625.00 4208 AWARDS, INC. Trophies-Rec Dept. 80.13 4209 BRW Service-Schooner Blvd., Valley View 27,966.34 Road from T.H. 169 to I 494, Dell Road T.H. #5 & West 78th Street & Mitchell Rd., Anderson Lakes Parkway, Homeward Hills Rd. 4210 BITUMINOUS INS. CO. Replace power pole-Park Dept. 75.00 4211 BRAEMAR QUICK-PRINT Printing-Tax Increment 111.00 4212 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING Service-Anderson Lakes Parkway 370.30 4213 BROWN PHOTO Film-Assessing Dept. 212.50 . 4214 MAXINE BRUECK Mileage 3.99 4215 CASE POWER & EQUIPMENT Equipment rental-Park Dept. 1,152.00 4216 CHAPIN PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal ads 53.90 ' 4217 COLUMBIA TRANSIT CORP Charter bus-Rec Dept. 158.00 4218 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. Office supplies-Community Services 43.28 4219 DALCO Wet Vacuum-Water Dept. 781.00 4"0 DALSIN INDUSTIRES, INC. Fence-Cty Road 1 Bikeway 19.00. 4_ I DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO. Water meters-Water Dept. 5,584.86 4222 DECATUR ELECTRONICS, INC. Repair radar-Police Dept. 9.68 4223 DOWN TO EARTH Install fence-Community Service 225.00 4224 EDEN PRAIRIE CLEANERS Clean shirts & blanket-Police Dept. 7.50 4225 EDEN PRAIRIE COIC1UNITY CLUB Refund-Rec Dept. 15.00 4226 ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. Well #3 Equipment repair & parts 623.45 4227 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS Concrete blocks & brick-Round Lake Park 158.80 4228 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. Manhole cover-Round Lake Park 196.00 4229 G.L. CONTRACTING, INC. Repair water leak-Flying Cloud Drive 336.05, 4230 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Equipment repair & parts 9.86„ 4231 KARIN GORI Instructor-Rec Dept. 108.00, 4232 GUNNAR ELECTRIC C0h1PANY INC. Rewire parking lot lights-Round Lake Park 229.82 4233 JACK HACKING Expenses 15.76 4234 iARMON GLASS & GLAZING, INC. Repair windows-Fire Dept. 73.42 4235 IENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION 1980 Taxes 2,744.97 4236 iENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION Supplies-Engineering Dept. 63.25. 4237 IENNEPIN CO-OPERATIVE SEED EXCHANGE Fertilizer-Park Dept. 2,100.50 4238 10PKINS FIRESTONE DEALER STORE Equipment repair & parts-Police Dept. 73.7G 4239 10PEINS PRINT SHOP, INC . Print newsletter-Senior Citizens Center 55.68 4240 ITASCO LQUIPMENT CO. Blades-Street Dept. 10.86 4241 GENE A. JACOBSON Conference-Fire Dept. 50.25 4242 KARULF HARPMANE, INC. Shovel, cord-Park Dept. 11.72 4243 KLEVE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING INC. Repair furnace-City Hall 30.00 4244 LAKELAND ENVELOPE Envelopes-Assessing Dept. 214.30 "15 BOB LAP ,ERT Expenses 106.7S 41-46 LANG, PAULY & GREGERSON, LTD. Legal service 7,294.09 4247 RICH LEDIN Instructor-Rec Dept. 67.5c 4248 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR, INC. Seeder-Park Dept. 2,446.0C 4249 LYNOE COMPANY Dog repellent-Water Dept. 33.82 4250 VOID OUT CHECK 4251 TREASURER, STATE OF MINNESOTA Notary fee-Building Dept. 10.OI' PByc four December 2, 1980 4252 MAGUEY CONSTRUCTION CO. Service-Eden Prairie Community Center 102,396.00 4253 MARTEX SAFETY PRODUCTS Safety floor paint-Water Dept. 103.94 4254 ROBERT MARTZ Expenses 112.35 4255 METROPOLITAN FIRE EQUIPMENT CO. Recharge fire extinguisher-Fire Dept. 64.00 4256 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION October SAC charges 38,709.00 4257 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION Blacktop 1,268.81 4258 MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE CO. Employment ad-Building Dept. 44.80 4259 MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY Service 919.98 4260 MINNEATA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP Service 24.67 4261 MINNESOTA VALVE & FITTING CO. Supplies-Water Dept. 40.39 4262 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT CO. Posts-Park Dept. 744.86 4263 RAY MITCHELL Conference-Fire Dept. 58.80 4264 NORELCO Tape recorder-Park Dept. 166.97 4265 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY Service 2,720.00 4266 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY Service 2,579.53 4267 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY Service 6.36 4268 NORTHRUP KING CO. Grass Seed-Prairie East 3,844.80 4269 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE Service 18.07 4270 PALM BROTHERS Equipment repairs-Liquor Store 144.19 4271 PENNY'S SUPERMARKET #25 Coffee-City Hall 86.77 4272 REGISTER PUBLISHING COMPANY Display ad-Liquor Store 64.00: RIDGE DOOR SALES COMPANY OF MINNESOTA Repair fire station door 39.00 44 i4 PAT ROSS Instructor-Rec Dept. 150.00 4275 BETA RUSS Refund-Rec Dept. 2.50 4276 SHADYWOOD TREE INJECTION, INC. Tree removal 212.50 4277 SHERMAN NURSERY CO. Trees-Round Lake Park 7,891.25 4278 STANDARD SPRING COMPANY Bolts & nuts-Police Dept. repairs 12.60 4279 SANDRA STEPHENS Instructor-Rec Dept. 36.76 4280 SULLIVANS SERVICES, INC. Pump tank-Research Road 50.00 4281 TIERNEY BROTHERS, INC. Supplies-Rec Dept. 31.00 ' 4282 THE TYPE HOUSE Lettering-Community Services 45.10 ' 4283 BOB TYSON Expenses 17.99 4284 ROGER ULSTAD Expenses 100.00 4285 VALLEY EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment Rental-Bikeway 1,850.00 4286 VESSCO Chlorinator valves-Water Dept 105.60 4287 VDHNOUTKA ROOFING & SHEET METAL Reroof Grill House 3,188.00 4288 TIM WARNER Election WOO 4289 RIVER WARREN AGGREGATES INC. Rock 5,856.24 4290 WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY Valve box section, curb box tops-Water 666.49 Dept. 4291 WHEELER HARDWARE CO. Freight charges 1.50 4292 WESCO Lamp-Senior Citizen Center 13.401 4293 WOODEN BIRD FACTORY Overpayment-Building permit 2.70; 4294 XEROX CORPORATION Service 98B.94I 4295 JIM ZAIC Material for kitchen sink-City Hall 53.151 996 ZIEGLER INC. Equipment repair & parts 116.3Ey L 7 HAYDEN-MURPIIY EQUIPMENT CO. Three Spreaders & Plows-Street Dept. 13,824.00 4298 HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIRECTOR Service-Anderson Lake Parkway 74,947.52 4299 M.E. LANE, INC. Notary-Building Dept. 20.00; 4300 MCBEE LOOSE. LEEF BINDER PRODUCTS Binders-Guide Plan 324.99 4301 TREASURER-MILWAUKEE RAILROOD Sanitary Sewer Crossing Permit 325.00 Page five December 2, 1980 4302 TREASURER-MILWAUKEE RAILROAD Storm Sewer crossing permit 400.00 TOTAL $435,817.80 • • • • • • 71, approved Planning Commission Minutes October 27, 1980 Members absent: Liz Retterath ff D. BELVEDERE INTERIM USE AMENDMENT, by On-Belay. Request to change dental office interim use at 8180 Franlo Road to an adolescent treatment center to be called "Prairie House". The Planner introduced John Curran representing On-Belay, and stated that the property is owned by Dr. Belvedere. Curran reviewed the neighbor's concerns, safety, property values, noise, parking, and the reason they chose Eden Prairie for their next treatment center and also passed out letters of support and a brochure. The Planner reviewed the staff report dated October 23, 1980. Sutliff asked what licensing is required by the City. The Planner replied health, sanitation, and building. Sutliff asked what type of security is required. Curran replied that the house would have an alarm on the back door with someone awake at all times. He also stated that if someone leaves, the staff calls the police. ' Sutliff asked how long the average individual stays and what the cure rate was. Curran replied the average individual stays 6 to 8 weeks and stated that approximately 30% are cured with 70% of those on an aftercare program. Sutliff asked how many staff are needed and if there is any emergency care. Curran replied that 5 or 6 staff are on hand at most times with a RN nurse working 40 hours a week. Gartner asked if the proponent anticipates any parking problems during the family hours ar;d if this proposal was before the human Rights Cononission. Curran replied that they do not anticipate any parking problems and that this was before the Human Rights Commission and was approved. The Planner stated that he attended the meeting and told the commis:;ion about the Belvedere site and the commission agreed that it was a better location, than the P.D.Q. site at Mitchell and Valley View as originally proposed. • • Gartner asked the cost for keeping someone at the center. Curran replied that • there are insurance agencies that pick up most of it and that the cost is $85.00 per day with a $200.00 admission fee. Levitt asked where the patients come from. Curran replied from schools, police, local churches, doctors, out-patient programs, etc. Bentley asked if this proposal has been reviewed by the Metropolitan Council. Curran replied it was not necessary and further stated that he feels there is a need for this typo of treatment center in Eden Prairie. Sutliff asked if this is similar to Alcohol Anonymous. Curran replied at Alcohol Anonymous the individuals with problems do not live in the treatment center, how- ever, some of the treatment philosophy was the same. He also stated that many people are referred to Narcanon of AA for aftercare. 2d(e • approved Planning Commission Minutes -5- October 27, 1980 Tony llestcrhaus, 8470 Franlo Road was concerned with the sewer and water. He also stated that he is against the proposal, because of potential problems for the neighborhood. • Levitt asked if private sewer and water is possible. The Planner replied that a q. new septic system would have to be put in. Bob Affeldt, representing Robert Houten of the Mormandale Dental Lab asked if the individuals come voluntarily. Curran replied that there are some that have a choice however, there are no criminal cases admitted. Dr. Belvedere stated that he had the same reservations as the residents originally but he now approves of the use and feels that it will be more compatible with the neighborhood than short term renters. He had trouble in the past with large parties. Torjesen asked how long the project has been before Eden Prairie. The Planner replied it had been to the Human Rights and Services Commission twice, so about 4 weeks. MOTION • Torjesen moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the Prairie House interim Use as per the material dated 10/16/80 and the 10/23/80 staff report with the contin- gencies as li sted in the and stafffreport. Levitt seconded, motion carried 3:2:1. Dearman and i . J�. 1 - f 2L-Gq • • • • t MEMO • TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jean Johnson, Assistant Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: October 23, 1980 PROJECT: PRAIRIE (HOUSE Interim Use at 8480 Franlo Road BACKGROUND The .76 acre site is presently zoned Rural with an approved interim use for a one individual dentist office. The length of interim use approval is until July 13, 1981. The City Guide Plan depicts this site and surrounding uses as Neighborhood Commercial. The present zoning is Rural. LOCATION MAP i , , r�'' tr.- j. 1....._.........v.,,,„:,:::- .. :7.,........t.:,,..„1„,.. 31 a N a Mo C- � /� E :N AMIE t7 7Q 12 -13 / -----"- \ife I L.o..7,::\ • H • 0 F c. 1r "......- -••• I t•l tT"r rr, Rl1 PRI tMIf ~ .7a-1 tPU y% •124.\ F ,r- ! e l ,, SITE S R ` • �' z/ ..,-_-r4:-,err /rJ ;- - it v. �jj ( t!, i. -ter'__ . p.: , ,.? .,.._ .,, ,,.... • ik ''! ''7 ( �L\1 4 1 t If z Z7 T7 �1 �. •,-, it' 1 { :-T t.;1C1a `C '' ,r ill-ail-Y I d- '.1.ti.\ ,, ,'t lJ1 7 1 i ,1 1f1.'c:Zy�c 1117)11 f/ '11 ."'. REQUEST Ur. Paul Belvedere, on behalf of On-Belay, Inc., is reniiesting i:iodi- ification and extension to the interim use at. Ra80 Franlo Road to permit operation of an adolescent treatirrnt facility. 1 i ?1v Memo-Prairie (louse -2- October 23, 1980 • PROGRAM On-Belay, Inc.'s treatment proposal would serve up to 16 adolescents and be staffed around the clock. Up to three or four staff would be present the nights family counseling is conducted. The program outline includes community involvement through the organization of an advisory commission to review and monitor the program. The prioritization process would give preference to Eden Prairie residents. This would mean service to city residents prior to acceptance of out-city residents. • The On-Belay Inc. organization presently operates facilities in Plymouth and Minnetonka. These communities have found the On-Belay program to be closely supervised and well staffed. No • parking or conduct problems have aroused. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS The house is situated in the center of the lot and has mature growth of trees along the sides and rear yards, and scattered large trees • located in the front yard (see attached drawing). Approximately 50 feet from the rear of the house the lot drops in grade toward the northwest corner. • Surrounding uses are: to the east Mr. Westerhaus's drive and the Boutcn Dental Lab; to the north Mr. Westerhaus's house; to the west an older farm house presently for sale; and to the south across Franlo Road is vacant land (see attached). PROPOSED Ii1PROV[I'WNTS Enlargement of the structure is proposed by adding on an addition • measuring 26 x 50 north of the existing structure. Eight parking stalls are proposed in the front yard 50+ feet from Franlo Road R.O.W. Parking along the sides or rear would substantially reduce the existing trees which provide a screen to adjacent properties. Construction of hard surface spaces in front of the house will locate the parking outside the basement windoucchich are at eye level to occupants. Plantings between the house and parking lot would create a better view and is recommended along with additional p lant.ings he tween Er aril() and the parking spaces. • • The similar uses in iinnetonka and Plymouth have similar parking and • their City Staff have tint rcceivcod complaints. if parking problems occur, the City could contact the proponent and identify areas where • additional spaces could be added. • Memo-Prairie House -3- October 23, 1980 Presently the structure is served by private water and septic system. This system proved inadequate in the past, based upon neighbor reports, when the house was rented to a large number of individuals. Prior to entering into an agreement, the proponent must supply to the City information as to the private septic system con- dition and capacity. An alternative would be to connect to mun- icipal service which is planned for extension next year to a point approximately 800 feet south of this property. CONCLUSION The Staff review finds the site plan acceptable for the use proposed and believes the retention of mature trees out- weighs the disadvantage of locating parking in front of the house. The interim use is requested in the Major Center • Area and is consistent with said report policies. The pro- gram proposed gives preference to treatment of Eden Prairie applicants and will provide a service viewed as needed in all communities. RE C01 r1r tDAT I ON S the Planning Staff recommends approval of modification and extension to the interim use at MO Franlo load for Prairie House contingent upon the following: • • 1. That the Prioritization process as outlined be maintained throughout duration of the interim use. • 2. That a landscaping plan, including but not limited to screening of the parking spaces from the house and • Franlo Road. • 3. That upon written notification from City that additional parking is needed, said parking will be added as per • City Staff reconnnendations. 4. That the private water and sewer system be constructed • to City standards; -or- that connection to municipal service is requested. 5. That the interim use he pe nnitted for a period not to exceed five years, renewable after request from the proponent and review and approval by the City. G. That the structure he modified as per the building ( inspector's recommendations. JJ:ss • 2d7 2 Memo-Prairie House -4- October 23, 1980 t .r„ tin �;. n `. EDEN PRAIRIE CENTER":., t� r ` �' SCHOONER RLVD'; ( Houton Lab j ly) 'r C . ''...': .(.. '-"' '. ..::f. 5,. 7:; (I) iIl_T1i -k / r 1 r PROPOSED PRAIRIE HOUSE - (� lde>ter�% t kC_ (f 1 haus '1! C.-N G f fi n. `4::: a , D Li Lil LS) ,. (s) (i4) 0 (z) (8) - pl, 300 . ..,. ...,..‘,, (,...4) .0. t..4., v....;,. (3) ...., (7.0 ;t 3 (6) ,'' :a' • Cp..r, 111 200 feet 0 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Roger Y. Ulstad, City Manager Roger Pauly,City Attorney • Chris finger, City Planner FROM: Rae Bly, Human Services Coordinator DATE: September 24, 1989 SUBJECT: Valley View Center The Human Rights and Services Commission reviewed the Valley View Center proposal with Mr. John Curran, Executive Director of Louis House, at the Commission meeting September 22nd. Need for a residential adolescent treat- ment facility in South Hennepin was confirned through reports prepared earlier this month by the South Hennepin Human Services•Council staff. Marilou Ilenderlite, of the Eden Prairie High School, indicated that she has referred between 20 and 30 Eden Prairie youth to residential treatment for serious chemical abuse problems in the last two years. The Louis House program was also carefully reviewed by the Commission who determined that it is a high quality program. Ms. Ilenderlite varificd that Louis House has one of the two best records in terms of followup on their graduates. The appropriateness of the proposed location, at 7406 Mitchell Road, was also questioned by the Commission who concluded that the advantages of the location out weighed the potential for problems. Marcia Loclinan moved that the Commission endorse the Valley View Center Program and site proposal. The motion was seconded by Ann Hodgson Thiel and passed unanimously. RB:md • • • �II • • • i ! • 2('7LJ . Q 0 MEMORANDUM TO: HUMAN RIGHTS AND SERVICES COMMISSION • COMMUNITY BASED RESIDENTIAL SERVICES BOARD/ COMMUNITY CONSULTATION COMMITTEE FROM: RAE DLY, HUMAN SERVICES COORDINATOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 1980 SUBJECT: EDENVALE CENTER PROPOSAL . On Monday night, Mr. John Curran, t:ie Executive Director of Louis House, will be present to discuss the EdenvaleCenter Proposal with you. Materials are enclosed to familiarize you with the proposal to initiate an adolescent alcohol and drug treatment center to be located at 7406 Mitchell Road. The Planning Department has advised Mr. Curran that the Commercial Zoning of this proposed site does not allow this use. An Industrial Zoned site would permit such use. You may wish to focus on the the statement of need, the proposal for community involvement and the program description at this time. Agency inventory information is not yet available from the Study of Human Service Needs, but this data as well as the data from the General Population Survey and the 0 Key Informant Surveys should be available in the near future. . • . G f • • • 0 0 • Tilt.G WEN linvember 6, 1980 William Bears an, Chairman Planning Commission City of :den Prairie 55344 Dear Bills I am sorry to have to miss the Planning Commission on i-;onday, because I had wanted to make it a matter of record at that meeting that I have some afterthoughts about the interim use amendment on Franlo :toad, which we recommended by a 3-2-1 vote last time. That was my motion, and I regret that it did not limit the '- proponent to solving his sewer problem at no expense to surrounding properties. We permitted an interim use to trigger a possibility of sewer assessments. This makes the project, in effect, not an interim use, and, furthermore, threatens the interim and transitional uses of surrounding properties. If the commission wishes to reopen this matter, the maker of the motion has no objection. Pace • k( llakon Torjesen • i • • { I lulum t6 Karen ToKiesen f', t,(lO Itotcluttd!tool,l:dr,t Prairie, linncwettt:35344 ❑ Teteplttigc.t h1'219444: 4 it 1/4 ref • `z10'Wry�.ti.✓�W.i/ October 31, 1980 • t1:n•ur I:oif•':ur t',n el f:ounr•1 hits w.an I Al:at.rn, Councilman have O:cteranit Councilwoman Sidney I'duly Councilman Paul Rcdnatia Edon Prairie City Hall Pear ;lavor and Oembers of the Eden Prairie City Council: The ltn-i lay Cnrnnration has made a nrnposal to the Human Rights Commission and to the City 1'lannin,.. Commission to be?in a Adolescent Alcohol. and Drug 'Treatment Center In Edon Prairie. Initially the Human Rights Commission unanimously supported the need for the service and recommended that the city approve this usa in the building located on tll._• corner of `iitcltell Road and Valley View Road. Subsequently, On-11 lay Corporation approached the city planner and was informed that the zoning of this facility was inappropriate for that tyre of win and it was recommended that can-Iselav seek an alternative site and request interim Use Agreement at an appropriate alternative site. In following, the recormaIndations of the city pl.anner,On-Belay located a site a 8tli',O 1'ran10 Road within which we would like to provide the proposed program. Co NOnday October 27, 1980, the planning conrnission recommended approval of this site for this nurnnee.with a number of conditions. It lee our understanding that the city planning staff will forward that recommend- ation as well as the one from the liuntan Ri.phts Commission to yourselves. The purpose of this letter is to request a public hearing at the earliest date for the city council to consider the aunroval of the site at 800 Crania Road for the proposed "Prairie Ilnuse" Adolescent Treatment Center for the pur!tns.e of serving, adolescents in Eden Prairie sand other South Hennepin Areas who are suffering from alcohol and drug related problems. I :appreciate your consideration of this request and am nvailahle to r'spand to ;any question . Hy work number is 546-R008 and my home phone is 72O-1480. titipgerc-1 y, • Ohn 14, Curr:!n, .1r. ,xucutice Uirrctnt' PLYMOUTH.MINNtTOTA t t.t4t ti F d ''w-1 la 1 �""'il"�all C�lwvde.l�t(r,i��l� 115 FOaF.iTVIEW LANE NORTH • • rs t1..17ei f*\�.I'- l-' .c / 1612/S10 U000 • • 1 ` October 24, I980 [I ' ' CITY OF PLYMOUTH. Mr. Chris Enger, City Planner • City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55.,44 Dear Mr. Enger: I understand that the City of Eden Prairie is considering a petition from the Louis House to establish a residential treatment facility for chemically dependent adolescents. A similar treatment center has been located in south- west Plymouth in the last year. In checking with our police department, I find that no calls for service have occurred as a result of the Louis House. This is particularly significant as the facility is located in an area adjacent to a junior high school, church and residential neighborhood. I am further advised by our police department that the Wayzata School District has been particularly pleased with the services made available through this facility. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Yours very truly, Frank Boyles Administrative Assistant PD:jm cc: John Curran, Executive Director Louis House • • 2777 340()Pl..)1.4o1.11I I BOULEVARD,PL MOD TN,MINNESOTA 55441,TLLCPHONI:p 12)959.1,i00 I Paul C.Belvedere,D.D.S. to?)922.91t9 ( Southdale Medical Building • 0400 Fran10 Woad .. ' �545 a.Min esotaeSouth Eden Pruu0,Minnesota 55349 Edina,Minnesota 55495 October 9r 1980 . • Chris enrer, t'ity Planner City of Eden Prairie 8950 den Prairie '`oad Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343 Dear Mr. Engert . Please consider attached proposal for utilisation of building at 8430 Franlo Road. I hereby request modification and extension of the existing interim use agreement presently recognised between • city of Eden Prairie and myself for the inclusion of these services, for a period of years equal to a lease and renewal period of same. onered Due ofoOctobert14limitaio�s1980rofuthe Planningeqest this be cCa asion.at the ( Thank you. Sincerely yours, j'be be. CI 612141-4--L /.0i) . aul ti. uelvedore 44115. I I: - • . 2$1q 7.71 -771 It It r---- 1 SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL E.•) Sowmp: • Bloomington Eden Prone Edina R,cidmhl Report to the South Hennepin Human Services Council • • Board regarding Proposed Primary Residential Treat • - ment for Chemically Dependent Adolescents in the South Hennepin Area. September 17, 1980• Overview a In July, 1930 John Curran, Executive Director of Louis House contacted 1: staff on the desire to locate a residential treatment program for chemi- I cally dependent adolescents in the South Hennepin area. Mr. Curran represents the same group who proposed the "Eden Prairie Treatment Center" in 1978 and their request was that this proposal be a continuation of I their original proposal. Although, the Eden Prairie Treatment Center 1 never materialized, Treatment Center On-Belay, Inc. did open Louis House in Plymouth, Minnesota in early 1980. John Curran and two Board Members of Treatment Center On-Belay, Inc. gave a presentation to the South Hennepin Human Services Council at the August 20, 1980 Board Meeting. • 0 (Sec Board Meeting minutes for summary.) The South Hennepin Human Services Council Board directed staff to review the proposal in greater detail and • report back at the September Board Meeting. Staff activity since the August • 20th meeting has included: a site visit to Louis House and a review of Louis House Program with their staff, a meeting with Duane Pidcock , Chair of Eden Prairie Human Rights and Services Consrission and John Curran, a review of Louis House written program description, several additional conversations with John Curran and feedback from both chemical dependency and youth service providers in the South Hennepin area. A support letter has been received from Sharon Lee, Director, Fairview Receiving and Evalua- tion Center. Several Board Members have also received feedback • about the Louis House staff and program. Heed Silica. 1978, no real change has occured in the South Hennepin area regarding chemical dependency residential treatment for adolescents. There cur • - j rently is no residential program within our area, although there are several • facilities available throughout the Metropolitan area. Some of the youth serving agencies believe that having a facility in close proximity mould enhance the possibility of better serving the youth in our area. Only a • few providers thought chemical dependency services were reaching their saturation point and that further proliferation would be seen as negative. • • However, most providers felt that there remains a need for chemical depen- dency services, but even if there was not the need, they argued that • additional competition would only r ur: to improve the quality of cervices. irrogardle;:, of which side of the issue the South Hennepin Ihnnan Services Council takes, it is difficult for us to control who provides services in our area. Our primary role is to work with the agencies in the South Hen- nepin area in order that services; most effectively meet the need:; of our Comnun i ty. 2/10 Report to the. SHHSc' oard re: Proposed Primary Res))--1,ntial Treatment for Chemically Deperr• nt Adolescents in the South itk,rrepin Area - page 2 Since the development of a Hennepin County Purchase of Service agreement is not being proposed, one clientele being left unserved is youth not covered by insurance. This remains a concern of the Council. Program Based upon a review of the Louis House program report and a site visit, it is our opinion that Louis House is a sound program offering quality • services to the community. Louis House staff are well trained and have extensive experience in providing chemical dependency treatment. Their staffing pattern and staff/client ratio are adequate to supervise and pro- vid personal services. There is evidence that the Louis House staff work well with commmmity agencies and schools. Treatment Center On-Belay is a private, profit making corporation whose Board Members and Executive Dir- ector are qualified to administer this type of program. They indicate a willingness to use an advisory committee in shaping and modifying their pro- gram to meet community needs. Recommendation The South Hennepin Human Services Council endorses Treatment Center On-Belay, Inc.'s proposal to locate a 15-16 bed residential treatment facility for chemically dependent adolescents in the South Hennepin area and recommends that they actively pursue an agreement with Hennepin County to serve youth who are not covered by insurance. RS/jmd • • • • • I 0 1 f 0 0 9/16/80 EDENVALE RECOVERY CENTER PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE ANALYSIS DESIRED AVAILABLE % CHANGE IN FUNCTION SQ. FT. SQ. FT. SQ. FOOTAGE Small Group Room 196 175 -11% Family Counselor 120 115 - 4% After Care 120 115 4% Living Room 375 420 +12% 200 -16 % (4) Bedrooms 240 -16% P (4) Bedrooms 240 200 (4) Bedrooms 240 228 - 5%- 4% (2) Bedrooms 120 115 (2) Bedrooms 120 115 - 4% Recreation/Exercise Room 702 330 -53% Nurses Station 100 95 - 5% Dining Room/School, 432 410 - 5% Kitchen-Pantry 455 . 260 -42% Laundry Storage 144 104 -27% Men's Room 180 120 -33% -33X Women's Room 180 120 Executive Director 120 125 + 4% Program Director 120 125 + 4% I Recreation C Books 200 165 -18% Counselor 120 100 -16% Counselor 120 115 - 4% TOTALS 4650 3750 -20% ! 1 Average reduction to each space is 12% 3750 Net Sq. Ft. = 78% Building Efficiency = 48C0 Gross Sq. Ft. 4650 = `,950 ross s ft. Gross square feet needed for efficiency 6' 78% _ .78125 g q• I 1 i i. 1 I • ( I. 1. I. �A M O ›' u F .00 o0 0 .0 r?In .n 01 H 0 P to aa++ 0 0 0 •.O-,e 0 O H I. 0l - w 4-1 U a+ .0 u u u a 0) 01 d , w 0 .Ui O 0 m co C N d .4 2 ?+1 a. 0f 0)0 0 ; .4 M .i I. 0 0 0..1 p u. ,-L d:C x c,-/ 1.1 •ao m H >. D. 0 •.01 > a.uC d .•1.4i .CC 0 0 W CI 1. u •r+•r+ OC ..•E ' 0 a, O0 u o H N a 0) d A.) 0•.1 0a . Hd w 1+ 4.1 1 H 6 14 y O u .e •o a,01 .0 a U a 0) •Oo 0, tolN� • tC 0 .00 O U U U O W 0, :1 0 01••V. ;OC + o 4, p. 0 OC 0. O 0 0O u M 4 01 O 00 >•r1 '14 o 6 0 i+ c0oo� 1.. t-t 5 .4 0 .. H W .•1 M E. I P. N 0.+ 0•M 91 C r) tr' x 0 a .0 a+ a 01.4 01 x D 0 T 0) 0 O W a O 0 U U pyp G.g+ G M x M 0 co 0 0 0 . FU 10+ 0 6' 1+ 0 1tl .01 0 u 0 u 0 0 ,M,'. e '^ 1 10 CC IE) p U 6•.O+ a 0 O Y. O K 00 IJ W 0 0,L N 0 E 0 CC O 0) O O O 0) U 01 u I 01 0 14 14 it,•,-0.. t• 14 'a X O 0i .0 o..1 44 01 0 .i 0) 0) u am.1 0 0 0 U 0 00Q.si 1 O u M O1 N O)F P 01 .0 UI O Of, 0 00 01 O •U 00 0 0•.+ CC O• O 1. U a+ 0 0 0 •M 01. 40 O O O+1 v, U) a a ck o .a a wxxCa ... m ©. m D•.0. .,.1 Y.O.tt00 0tt-i u w 0 u M 0 14+ 0) 10 N d u 1O+ u "'1 E 0 1N 01 K 01 0 01 O •d•0 0) 0 1., h 1n F W O.X 0 0 0 0 0 4-1 1L C .F, -4 .0 0.N.i 0) 1, 10 0) U v u -1 n e 0 a E-1 E+.` 0 O 0 u 0' 0 1 r1 0 I 01 0 00 CO F • 1:1 ,U 0 0 o 0 F 4 0 0 0 0•0 4 ,4 U /. 0 0 1. O .. 0 0 .0 o o C ro v, c a r C% o w A 0 H 00 07 oC 0 a 0 0. •.r'1 P. 0 d a, 0 H. N C U 0 11+.0 s ~ 0 01 0 01 0 0 (0 u u H ° I F •n0.1 Y 0 0 .0 > 0 Y T.-1 0u u O 0) U Li !J F• +0 0 0 U .+ 0 1 "-I O 1 • 0U, 0).0 a .0 0 0 u 0 01 0 q1 0 0 u a 0.+ oc 1+ U 1. 0 U I. F .+ OI O 0 0.I 00 U) C a d c: O w a O x x - c-a •a+-- J N P. 0l .L' 0 • OM •M 4' 2 H I 0 U CIO • a O O C. O.•1 O 4 10- CO 0 M 0 O O C) 1. 0 O[ 0 a, 14 u t', O O N K J0�1 0 ♦J I.,0 0) 0 p •• N 0.0 W k+ Q E 0) C. O•O E+0.1 O (j 1 00 .-1 V1 21, .+) O 1+ L+ D 0) I 0 I c: .0 0 1 �.�d 0,. ;7 .-ii 01 rJ u u O O C. •• U O 0 1 C uj .+I 0: O 0)F . 1- F N .•I 1' o 0 0 01 O U F,0 0' 0: .O r` cU u.-i 0 O C: o04. 0 I �,c. 11 aHI �, w : scat 1 1 1 Ci,/1 I I I�-I I 1 I I Q OI I I 0,/.+r .+OOC OC o 0 OC+O 0000OC O .. .. .. Aso c0000�00000c,00,oc oil •• OOO+N I!! 1 F� h W •i.-+.i.� .-1 r�N N d1.7 V1 Vl V7..D f�Ic�•O.O.O.I r�.-1 I 1 'I • .4 /.;1 `Fl Y) 1.1'.T1'ErIS OF SUPPORT • FOR On-BELAY'S PROI'OS1J • 1 1 ;.• ;• • 2'4Fti • To 'loom It Nay Concern: In repar.i to the planning of a new treatment center in Eden Prairie. I offer these comments. • I am an interested neigithor and a member of the Advisory Hoard. I live about !; mile from Louis (louse. There was a meeting there before the house was opened and neighbors were skeptical about it, hut after discussion, we felt better about the decision to open the house. Tn the 10 months that it has been in operation, we are all satisfied with the results of the operation, There has never been any effect on the neighborhood. on August 25, 1980, the Advisory hoard was invited to the 2nd Crnduation Ceremony. When you see these young people accept their (, diplomas, and then Present their medallions to their parents, many with tears and good comments to nuke about the treatment center, it makes one realize how important this place is and also how we need more of these places. Pifteen years ago I had a chemically dependent son, and they • had no place like this for the right treatment, only punitive places like Juvenile Center and Red Wing which did nothing for the problem, which lasted 11 years until he was 26 years old and realized he had to do it on his own. We as neighbors whom I have talked to are iianpv about Louis (louse and hope that places like this can continue. Sincerely, Mrs. Eleanor Iloaglund 11510 Rldgemount Ave. Plymouth, Minn. 55441 • 2& • • MEMORANDUM TO: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager Roger Pauly, City Attorney Chris Eager, City Planner FROM: Rae Dly., Human Services Coordinator Y' DATE: September 24, 1989 • SUCJrCT: Valley View Center The Human Rights and Services Commission reviewed the Valley View Center proposal with Mr. John Curran, Executive Director of Louis House, at the Commission meeting September 22nd. Need for a residential adolescent treat- ment facility in South Hennepin was confirmed through reports prepared earlier this month by the South Hennepin. Human Services Council staff, Marilou Ilenderlite, of the Eden Prairie High School, indicated that she has referred between 20 and 30 Eden Prairie youth to residential treatment for serious chemical abuse problems in the last two years. The Louis House program was also carefully reviewed by the Commission who determined that it is a high quality program. Ms. Ilenderlite varified that Louis House has one of the two best records in terms of followup on their graduates. The appropriateness of the proposed location, at 7406 Mitchell Road, was also questioned by the Commission who concluded that the advantages of the location out weighed the potential for problems. Marcia Lockman moved that the Commission endorse the Valley View Center Program and site proposal. The motion was seconded by Ann Hodgson Thiel and passed unanimously. + - L := RB:md j, . _ • 2orL If ,... .• SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL Serving Bloomington Eden Prairie Edina Richfield • Report to the South Hennepin human Services Council Board regarding Proposed Primary Residential Treat- ment for Chemically Dependent Adolescents in the South Hennepin Area. September 17, 1980 Overview In July, 1980 John Curran, Executive Director of Louis (louse contacted staff on the desire to locate a residential treatment program for chemi- cally dependent adolescents in the South Hennepin area. Mr. Curran represents the same group who proposed the "Eden Prairie Treatment Center" in 1978 and their request was that this proposal be a continuation of their original proposal. Although, the Eden Prairie Treatment Center never materialized, Treatment Center On-Belay, Inc. did open Louis House in Plymouth, Minnesota in early 1980. John Curran and two Board Members of Treatment Center On-Belay, Inc. gave a presentation to the South Hennepin Human Services Council at the August 20, 1980 Board Meeting. (See Board Meeting minutes for summary.) The South Hennepin Human Services Council Board directed staff to review the proposal in greater detail and report back at the September Board Meeting. Staff activity since the August 20th meeting has included: a site visit to Louis House and a review of louis House Program with their staff, a meeting with Duane Pidcock, Chair of Eden Prairie Homan Rights and Services Commission and John Curran, a review of Louis House written program description, several additional conversations with John Curran and feedback from both chemical dependency and youth service providers in the South Hennepin area. A support letter has been received from Sharon Lee, Director, Fairview Receiving and Evalua- tion Center. Several Board Members have also received feedback about the Louis House staff and program. Need Since 1978, no real change has occured in the South Hennepin area regarding chemical dependency residential treatment for adolescents. There cur- rently is no residential program within our area, although there are several facilities available throughout the Metropolitan area. Some of the youth serving agencies believe that having a facility in close proximity would enhance the possibility of better serving the youth in our area. Only a few providers thought chemical dependency services were reaching their saturation point and that further proliferation would be seen as negative. However, most providers felt that there remains a need for chemical depen- dency services, but even if there was not the need, they argued that additional competition would only work to improve the quality of services. Irregardless of which side of the issue the South Hennepin Human Services Council takes, it is difficult for us to control who provides services in our area. Our primary role is to work with the agencies in the South Hen- nepin area in order that services most effectively meet the needs of our community. • Report to the SHHSC Board re: Proposed Primary Residential Treatment for Chemically Dependent Adolescents in the South Hennepin Area - page 2 Since the development of a Hennepin County Purchase of Service agreement is not being proposed, one clientele being left unserved is youth not covered by insurance. This remains a concern of the Council. Prisram Based upon a review of the Louis House program report and a site visit, it is our opinion that Louis House is a sound program offering quality services to the community. Louis House staff are well trained and have extensive experience in providing chemical dependency treatment. Their staffing pattern and staff/client ratio are adequate to supervise and pro- vid personal services. There is evidence that the Louis House staff work ' well with community agencies and schools. Treatment Center On-Belay is a private, profit making corporation whose Board Members and Executive Dir- ector are qualified to administer this type of program. They indicate a willingness to use an advisory committee in shaping and modifying their pro- gram to meet community needs. Tri —South Hennepin Human Services Council endorses Treatment Center On-Belay, • Inc.'s proposal to locate a 15-16 bed residential treatment facility for chemically dependent adolescents in the South Hennepin area and recommends that they actively pursue an agreement with Hennepin County to serve youth who are not covered by insurance. • RS/jmd • Fairview Receiving and Evaluation Center 9927 Valley View Rd,Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 Telephone(612)941-0200 Sharon M.Les • Director September 23, 1980 South Hennepin Human Services Council 9801 Penn Avenue South, Room 100 Bloomington, MN 55431 Dear members, • It has come to my attention that Louis House is proposing to start an adolescent treatment program in the South Hennepin area. The foIIowing letter is in support of this endeavor. With the opening of two adolescent detoxification centers in Hennepin County, the number of adolescents requiring short term residential services will increase. Based on my professional experience, I believe Louis House consistantly demonstrated the highest quality care. Considerations given priority in my assessment of the program are as follows: 1) Program size - a small facility offering individualized services, 2) Experienced family counseling - 2 and 3 times per week during the entire patient stay, 3) High staff to patient ratio, 4) In-house. school - with sound linkages with schools . and referrals, 5) Intensive aftercare - for families and patients as readjustment due to learned behaviors is so difficult. The director, John Curran, generates exceptional programming by selecting experienced talented staff while integrating the most valuable therapeutic techniques available. His belief in providing quality services first and foremost, I contend, is responsible for his success in the chemical dependency field. Youth and families in the South Hennepin area would benefit greatly from a creative treatment program such as Louis House provides. I would be happy to answer any questions you may have on my assessment of the program for this vicinity. You may contact me at 94I-0200. Sincerely, p _ Sharon Lee Director • • cc: John Curran 2• ?' i A Fare n�Community F l (� COMMUNITY SLRVIC _S CHEMICAL DEI LNDE NCY DIVISION ' 1 HENNEPIN 1800 Chicago Avenue •••• Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404 March 3, 1960 Mr. Mark Wilcox, Director Chemical Dependency Division • Department of Public Welfare 4th Floor, Centennial Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Dear Mark: This letter serves as a letter of need for the On-Belay Corporation to provide a new adolescent chemical dependency residential treatment center within Hennepin County. This need is based upon the fact that presently the majority of adolescent treatment beds are utilized in conjunction with the fact that Hennepin County is planning on opening three new detoxification centers in 19D0, with significant adolescent capacity. This latter fact is based upon the anticipated need for detoxification and thus treatment services for adolescents within this County. It is expected, therefore, that there will be an additional 208 some youth each month detoxified in Hennepin County, many of whom may be in need of outpatient or residential treatment services. It is also important to note that, when dealing with the adolescent, while outpatient services are appropriate for many, there still exists as overall need ifor a substantial number of residential units to serve this population. This letter is not an endorsement of this individual corporation's activities, as that is the responsibility of your office, rather, it is a statement that additional residential treatment capacity is needed within Hennepin County. If you have any questions regarding the above, please call me at 348-7994. Sincerely, / ,1 Carl P. Sporer Chemical Dependency Division Director • lck cc: Mike Weber Phil Brekken Uon Anderson HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer • • CITY OF PtYMOUTH- October 24, 1980 John W. Curran Jr. Louis House 115 Forestview Lane North Plymouth, MN 55441 Dear John: I support the Louis House Treatment Center in our eonmunity. In my opinion, the early diagnosis and treatment of young persons is a very practical, common sense approach to a progressive disease. It is a rare exception when your staff calls the Plymouth Police • Department for assistance. There is absolutely no evidence that the Louis House facility generates more police service demands than would be expected from the typical residential unit in Plymouth. You are indeed a "good neighbor". s' ly, � y� • Richard J. Carlquist Chief of Police Plymouth, MN • • • 139 ,. .,.,.,. nngFi.,.n, 111Hru EnELA1CQATA..M1 Tr% PHANF if.vm r.cq?n fl October 24, 1980 CITY O- PLYMOUT F . • Mr. Chris Enger, City Planner City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Eager: I understand that the City of Eden Prairie is considering a petition from the Louis House to establish a residential treatment facility for chemically dependent adolescents. A similar treatment center has been located in south- west Plymouth in the last year. In checking with our police department, I find that no calls for service have occurred as a result of the Louis }louse. This is particularly significant as the facility is located in an area adjacent to a junior high school, church and residential neighborhood. I am further advised by our police department that the Wayzata School District has been particularly pleased with the services made available through this facility. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Yours very truly, r V ' Frank Boyles Administrative Assistant • FB:jm • cc: John Curran, Executive Director aet-- louis House _4, fIii1 1N(Mtn Fv.4(1t1.PL.YeAL1UTH MtNNLSOTA: 44% Tlit tIONE(612,'11�:n,io PROPOSED MENARD ADDITION REPLAT The Menard Facility is presently under construction within the Menard Addition at the northwest quadrant of 1494 & Hwy. 5. As this construction has progressed certain conditions have made it necessary to realign Plaza Drive through outlots D,E,& F. This realignment is proposed to be accomplished by the replatting of Dutlots D,E, & F as well as Plaza Drive. Three major factors have changed since the original plat of the Menard Addition was recorded suggesting the necessity for the realignment of Plaza Drive. First, Menard Inc. is constructing Schooner Blvd. within the confines of the plat. However, access to Schooner Blvd. is not possible until Valley View Road is reconstructed as a cul-de-sac and the portion of Schooner Blvd. outside the plat is constructed. Since this construction does not appear to be in the near future, none of the property along Schooner Blvd. in the Menard Addition has access. The realignment of Plaza Drive into Schooner Blvd. will alleviate the problem somewhat. Second, an existing Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Interceptor Sewer is in near proximity to the existing Plaza Drive. Grade differences make it necessary to construct a large embankment over the sewer. The sewer is constructed on soils which will settle and to minimize this settlement the realignment of Plaza Drive will enable the embankment to be lowered resulting in tolerable settlement. Thirdly, the new outlot configurations create more deve'opable property. In conjunction with Menard's request for approval of the proposed replat, the City must vacate the existing Plaza Drive alone with the existing drainage and utility easements on outlots D, E, & F. New easements for utilities and drainage will be dedicated with the final plat of the Menard Addition Replat. The City's consideration of Menard's request for the proposed replatting of the Menard Addition is appreciated. 20� Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes November 24, 1980 Members absent: Matthew Levitt A. MENARD ADDITION REPLI_IT, by Menard, Inc. Request to replat Outlots D, E, & f, Menard Addition. A continued public hearing. The Assistant Planner stated that this proposal has been continued many times and also stated that there is a staff report dated 11/21/80 regarding the plans dated 11/17/80. She also stated that Mr. Mary Prochaska, representing Menard's,was present and Mr. Dan Johnson,of Suburban Engineering,was also present. Dan Johnson reviewed the plan and stated that the proponent wants to realign Plaza Drive to intersect with Schooner Boulevard. He also reviewed the replat, the plan, the sight lines, the screening, and also stated that the use of Outlot C will remain residential. The Assistant Planner reviewed the staff report dated 11/21/80. Retterath asked when it is anticipated that Schooner Blvd. will be connected to Plaza Drive and Valley View Road terminated. The Assistant Planner replied that construction could begin next year and be finished in 2 years. Bearman asked if the proponent has discussed with the County the plans for Valley View Road's termination. Johnson replied that they believed that the City was going to take over the road. He also stated that the plan is based upon the termination • of Valley View Road as located on the plan. Dearman asked what the height- of the buildings would be. Johnson replied 40 ft. Bearman then asked if the buildings can be made higher than 40 ft. The Assistant Planner replied yes. Dearman asked if the proponent has any plans for Outlots D & E. Prochaska replied no. Torjesen asked if any grading has been done assuming this proposal is approved. Prochaska replied no. Bentley asked if there will be significant grade changes. Johnson replied yes. Retterath asked how much of a grade change. Johnson replied 7 ft. Bentley asked if there -:.s screening planned at the time of the original proposal. Dan Johnson replied that the buildings were to be used as screening. Bearman stated that he did not recall from the original proposal that the buildings would be used as screening. Bentley felt that Outlot C will have to be screened to screen the residents to the north of the site from the property. Bearman asked if commercial buildings have mechanical equipment on the top. The Assistant Planner replied yes. Torjesen asked if the embankment is stable. Johnson replied yes. Sutliff asked if sewer interceptor is a problem. Prochaska stated with the realigned Plaza Drive there is no problem. Jim Dugan, 12771 Vina Lane, stated that he does not feel that his view of the top of the itenard's building can be screened. 2'i/ Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes s November 24, 1930 John Reedy, 7262 Gordon Drive stated that he was concerned with the vacation:of•Valley • View Road because some driveways descend onto that road. Bentley stated that as he understood it, Schooner Blvd. has to meet grade require- ments and there is a grade problem to complete Valley View Road. He further stated that there would also be an intersection problem. Prochaska stated that at the time of the original proposal, it was agreed to cul-de-sac Valley View Road and the residents wanted it to be terminated because of traffic problems. Beaman stated that he recalls that point. The Assistant Planner stated that the City Engineer's office agrees with the proposed location of terminating Valley View Road. Reedy stated that he felt that it would be wrong for the Commission to assume that Valley View Road would be terminated. • Bill Verkuilen, 12650 Valley View Road stated that he approves of the termination of Valley View Road and believed the revised plan screens his views of the site. Reedy stated that he was concerned with the intersection of Plaza Drive and Schooner Blvd. MOTION 1: Ben ey moved to close the public hearing on Menard Addition Replat. Retterath • seconded, motion carried 6-0. • MOTION 2: Bentley moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the replat based upon the memos dated 11/21/30 and 8/5/80 and the material dated 11/17/80 and 8/20/80 with the following recommendations: 1. That a citizen's group be formed to work with the developer to insure screening that meets the requirements of the neighborhood. 2. That a performance bond, a cash escrow, or a letter of credit be posted for at least 150% of the estimated improvement cost. • 3. That the developer present a workable screening plan on Outlet C to screen existing housing to the north from development on this site. 4. That mature landscaping plant material be used. 5. That final grading plans for Outlots C, D, E, & F, be approved to the City prior to site alteration. 6. Further mass grading of building sites, for Outlots C, D, E, & F, without rezoning and platting approval will not be permitted. 7. That approval to this plan be contingent upon agreement with Hennepin County concerning the vacation of existing Valley View Road east of Topview Road. 8. Reaffirm residential uses on Outlot C. Gartner seconded, motion carried 5-1. Retterath voted no. approved Planning Commission Minutes October 27, 1980 ( Members absent: Liz Retterath A. MENARD ADDITION REPLAT, by Menard's Inc. Request to replat Outlots 0, E, & F, idenard Addition. A continued public hearing. 8earman read the letter from Menard's dated 10/21/80 requesting continuance until November 10, 1980 and asked the Planner if there has been any additional information submitted. The Planner replied that Menard's is working on a revised plan and will be ready November 10, 1980. Gartner asked if the berm that has been taken down in front of Menard's is in conformance with Menard's agreement. The Planner replied that the berm has been placed as a surcharge on bad soils, not as a screening element and is now being removed. Torjesen stated that he was concerned for residents that have been coming to the meetings, each time finding them continued. 0 John Reedy, 7262 Gordon Drive, stated that he is interested in the proposal and he had been attending each meeting on Menard's but would not be able to attend November 10. 4 Levitt stated that the continuances have been made at Menard's request for their convenience, and felt that the same courtesy should be extended to interested citizens. MOTION Torjesen moved to continue the hlenard Addition Replat to the November 24, 1980 meeting. Gartner seconded, motion carried 5-0. approved Planning Commission Minutes October 14, 1980 Members absent: William Bearman & Hakon Torjesen 13. HEARD ADD1T10tt REPLAT, by Menard, Inc. Request to replat Outlots A, E, & I,ttenardAddition. The easterly portion of Menard Addi- tion. A continued public hearing. } 0 Gartner reviewed the letter from Menards dated September 29, 1980 requesting to postpone the hearing to October 27, 1980. Motion Gartner moved to continue the Menard replat public hearing to October 27, 1980. as requested by Menard`s in their September 29, 1980 letter. Levitt secouwled, motion carried 5-0. • .2 Y7 ;. approved Planning Commission Minutes September 22, 1980 All members present. B. MEMARD ADDITION REPEAT, by Menard, Inc. Request to replat Outlots D, E, & F, Menard Addition. The easterly portion of Menard Addi- tion. A public hearing. Dearman stated that since there was no written request from Menard's to post- pone the public hearing, that they will be brought back in 2 weeks (October 14, 1980) and the commission will take action then. Motion Bentley moved to continue the public hearing to Tuesday, October 14, 1980 and to obtain written confirmation of the request for continuance from Menards. Retterath seconded, motion carried 7-0. 2?q7 approved Planning Commission Minutes September 8, 1980 Members absent: Hakon Torjesen D. MENARD ADDITION REPLAT, by Menard, Inc. Request to replat Outlets 0, E, & F Llenard Addition. The easterly portion of Menard Addition. A public hearing. t, The Planner introduced Mr. Dan Johnson of Suburban Engineering and Mr. Mary Prochaska,of Menard's, Inc. Johnson reviewed the Menard Addition and stated that because of problems, the proponent wants to replat. He also stated that the proponent would like to relocate Plaza Drive so that access can be provided to lots off of Schooner Blvd because of engineering problems. He also stated that there will be some screening done for the views of the homes near the site. The Planner reviewed the staff report of 9/5/80 and stated that the main difference in grading is by Schooner Blvd. Levitt asked if Topview Road would intersect with Valley View Road. The Planner stated that it is not proposed at this time. • Sutliff asked if Topview Road has access to other roadways. The Planner stated that there are 2 roadways connecting with Topview. Bentley asked if there is a plan for berming and landscaping. The Planner replied no. Bentley asked if the main problem is that they cannot build the road as originally proposed because of the sewer line. The Planner replied yes it is. Levitt asked if,in recommendation #3 of the staff report, overall means the entire site. The Planner replied yes but stated that reconstruction of Valley View Road has to be done before they can gain access. Levitt asked what the land use designations were. Johnson replied that they did not know but that they assumed Outlets D & E to be commercial. Levitt stated that the staff report shows many things that the proponent has not done. Bentley stated that he felt that the proponents should return. Bill Verkuilen, 12650 Valley View Road, presented photos of the views from his backyard. These photos are part of the minutes. John Reedy, 7262 Gordon Drive, representing the residents from Topview stated that the residents feel that the site looks much different than proposed. He also read 2 quotes from Zone 4, MCA Book, and stated that he felt that there is a need for sensitive development for the entire site but also felt that with the f proper screening and ' berming, that the site will look fine. ? .lil approved Planning Commission Minutes September 8, 1980 Jerry Speilman, 6601 Golden Ridge Drive felt that the plan needs sensitivity. Bernadine Moser, 7263 Topview, felt that Menard's has let down the neighborhood ® John Reedy, 7262 Gordon Drive, asked the commission to reconmend modification. Gartner asked if Valley View Road was promised to be done by July, 1980. The Planner stated that Plaza Drive could be connected to Valley View Road if improvements were not done. Levitt asked Prochaska if they would like this to be returned to them for revision. Prochaska replied yes. Motion Levitt moved to continue the public hearing to September 22, 1980. Bentley seconded, motion carried 6-0. 1 2900 �: • MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: Chris Enger Director DATE: November 21, 1980 REGARDING: MENARD INCORPORATED PRELIMINARY PLAT • Screening, and Site Line Plan. Menards has requested continuance several times in order to allow them time to respond to concerns of screeningandlandscaping from the September 5, 1980 Staff Planning Report. Menards has submitted new information which shows site lines from the Topview area south over the Menards development. In these plans they have depicted berming to try to intercept the site lines from the Topview area. Since Menards has already graded up to their very northern boundary because of the Schooner Boulevard location, the only land remaining which allows room for any type of berming would occur when Valley View Road east of Topview Road is vacated. This vacation should occur within the next two years as new Valley View Road from Mitchell Road east to Schooner Boulevard is constructed. Site lines C-I and D-J, have not been addressed in terms of any attempt for screening. These sites will have to have the site lines controlled by the placement of residential buildings in Outlot C, north of Schooner Boulevard, • B, the balance of the site lines should be.able to he controlled through the use of berming and extensive planting in the Valley View Road right-of-way. No attention has been paid to the screening of the site from Schooner Boulevard east of Plaza Drive. This will be a very critical site line which should be addressed perhaps through the use of berming south of the right-of-way of Schooner Boulevard. Beruring in the vacated Valley View right-of-way has several problems; one is the timing of when the berms would be placed; secondly, who would place the berms and the landscaping; thirdly, who would maintain the berm and the landscaping and last, if Menards is allowed to proceed at this time, what source of guarantee could be obtained to assure that they would comply. Methods which exist which could guarantee performance of the screening in the future, would be a performance bond, a cash escrow, or a letter of credit, any of which should he for 150;; of the estimated improvement cost. Access to the Menards area from the Topview area would have to occur west of the Topview area down through the Stewart Highlands area because of severe grade limitations where any type of connection directly from Topview down to Schooner Boulevard. Since the Menards area is currently graded, is su entirely visible from the Topview area, and free Valley View Road, the City may ultimately wish to consider having Mcnard, work with a citieens group representing the Topview arca to assume that the final screening plan is palatable for the neighborhood. • r.t- :/ 7,11 MEMO _ TO: Planning Commission FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning APPLICANT AND FEE OWNER: Menard, Inc. REQUEST: Preliminary Platting, Replatting of Outlots D, E, & F PROJECT LOCATION: NW Quadrant of I-494/U.S. 169/T.H. 5 interchange DATE: September 5, 1980 • BACKGROUND Menard, Inc. had previously platted their entire 70+ acres into two lots (Menard Building & Crown Auto), Outlots A-F, and R.O.W. For Schooner Blvd. and Plaza Drive. 4 As a part of this platting, and for development of the building pads and road F R.O.W.'s, Menard Inc. was granted grading according to a plan dated 12-19-78. Because of a very bad soil condition above the Metropolitan Sewer on lots D and E of the original plat, Menard Inc, wishes to relocate Plaza Drive. • i Traffic: Since Plaza Drive is proposed to be moved approximately 65D' to the west, it this offset will1heline adequate with andhnotproposed cause aramps roblem.m IIt94 at will however, necessitate two additional turning movements for traffic which would utilize I-494 off ramps to Plaza Drive. Accss for e e. foreOutlotsOCt&Bulots should Plaza rive onl of Plaz in akn aDrilve,fandr Access if full access is expected for each one, should not be offset from eachother. If right-in, right-out access for C & B is sufficient, these accesses may be offset. • Because of the recent interest in the general area for Regional Commercial uses owhich are high itraffic provements,athes) and the proponent shallsdolan thefor Tax gradingllforf'thetent1irecing fof re lane, road ivi i four lane, divided, Schooner Boulevard section at this time. Assessments are an- ticipated to remain the same, however. f er x of the severe Road, ide tiwillence not between the possible,east fromeadpractitcalnstanndvpoint,, existing Valley Vie to connect with Valley View Road until it is regraded easterly to the bridge. Grading: Site grading of the new lots is considerably different from thei1originat . plan. In the existing plan, there were to be three tiers of building. • level (where Menards is currently under construction) was to he at 855. The second tier, north;-test. and northeast of Menards, was to he at approximately 860, and the third tier up closer to Valley View Road was to be approximately 880-885. This upper tier of lots would leave smaller building for use uses more dcom�pht ble with land to the north, and able to offer hotter 2r2 J2 Memo--Menard's Replat -2- September 5, 1980 ( By enlarging the frontage of Outlot E on Valley View Road, the laadiuse contemplated clearly becomes Regional Commercial. Because of the steep grade from this pad up to Schooner Blvd. and Valley View Road, the view of the entire site from the Top View, Schooner Blvd, and Valley View Road area, will be parking lots, outside storage and the tops of large commercial buildings. This situation is unacceptable. The Staff offers the following suggestions: 1. Modification of the proposed grading plans to provide berming on the north portion of the development so that site lines from the north rise above the development proposal, or 2. Modification of the grading plan so that building pads along Schooner Blvd. and Valley View Road are elevated even with the grade of the roads. In addition, a committment to utilize these lots for midrise office structures, which would screen the Commercial Development below. • Land Use: Menard Inc. should connnit at this.time to the use of Outlot C as'residential. • • Commercial uses on Outlets D & E, with the grading shown are not compatible with • the land use to the north. Grading should be altered as outlined earlier. Office would be a much more compatible use along the northern edge of Outlet E than Regional Commercial, as proposed. RECOi 1MENDAT I ONS: • The Planning Staff would recommend modification of the plan as presented according to this report; specifically: 1. In a project of this size, land use designations should be indicated, which are compatible with surrounding uses. Outlot C, should be residential and the bal- ance of the property should be screened. 2. The grading, as proposed, opens the entire area up to views from above. Valley View Road is 65 feet above the building pad of the Menard's building. The view will be of building tops and parking if the plan is approved as is. This is not the situation originally proposed by Menard's. • • 3. Connection to Valley View Road prior to the overall Schooner Blvd. improvement • from 1-494 to T.H. 5 should not he permitted. 4. Grading for a 4-lane divided Schooner Blvd. should be done, by the proponent with planned accesses no closer than 660'. • 5. Restoration of the graded area shall be according to Watershed District recom- mendations. { CC:ss 1�3U3 ti • • 0 0 J r l 17 t �,' , GENERAL OFFICES � I I 1 1 I ROUTI.110.2.rAU CI.AIII.,WI!:CONSIN 54701 UJ`"ILiL »L1\.i .:" ,I'- . ��✓ a UWViLL:aA 1`10111. 17151 074.5911 October 21, 1900 • City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Rd. Eden Prairie, RN 55344 ATTII: CHRIS E NGE.R • • • Dear Chris; I would like to confirm our phone conversation of today, in this letter. Menard, Inc., would like to request that the replat of the Menard Addition be tabled until 11-10-80, which at that time we would like to be put on the agenda of the Planning Commission. Please accept my most sincere apology that Menard, Inc., is not ready for the 10-27-£0 Planing Commission i:eeting. Please realize that this is a very busy time of year for our Company as well as for Suburban rigineering and that our every intent was to make the 10-27-80 Planning Commission Fleeting. However, at this time, we do not have all the necessary pertinent data required to properly execute a well developed plan. • I am, however, very confident that given a couple of more weeks, Suburban Engineering will have a plan together that will be well dcvloped, making it much easier for everyone concerned to visualize the problems and their ultimate solutions with the Menard Rcplat. • SincQre.I,y) Doug Lawrence Project Tanager • MEN.RD, INC. c: J. Ilenard M. Prochaska • • • 2 9Gtl 0 0 GENERAL OFFICES -5.r > P, 11F, r] 1 I{ 1 ROUT/:NO.2.[AU GLRIf1 f:.WISCONSIN 54701 � ,•l[.��.,.::v i.�`��L1�•u 1-'V,�,T+'" ���-�``'i�Q ?MUNC: 17154 074 5944 September 29, 1980 City Of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie ltd. Eden Prairie, IN 55344 ATTN: Chris Eiger Dear Chris: Menard, Inc. would like to have the replat of the. Menard Addition tabled until 10-27-80, which at that time we would like to be put on the agenda of the Planning Commission. Thank you very much. Sincer y, Doug rencef Project Manager Menard, Inc. DL/jg c: J. tsenard M. Prochaska 23Ct) 'r 2 Minnesota 11{ j ii 4 )�ll'Department ent of rI'ans j)ort�lli lln ! '- D!S(11ct 5 "�Z, �4 2055 No. Lilac. Drive 0FTat4' Golden Valley, Minnesota 554.22. September 26, 1980 02)54S-376t Mr. Chris Engel-, Planning Director City of Eden Prairie City Hall 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, PC 55344 In reply refer to: 315 S.P. 2701 T.H. 5 S.P. 2785 T.H. 494 Plat review of Menard Addition Re-Plat Located in the northwest quadrant of I-494 and T.H. 5 in Section 11, Township 116, Range 22, in the City of Eden Prairie, • Hennepin County Dear Mr. Enger: We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. We find the plat acceptable for further development with consideration of the following comments: - Although the highway right-of-way appears adequately defined, Mn/DOT is not relinquishing any property claims or rights on our rights-of- way, as currently occupied, through this plat approval process. - Access to this plat from TH 5 must be through the new signalized inter • - section at West 78th Street via the north frontage road. Direct access to TH 5 near the southwest corner of Outlot A must be removed. If you have any questions in regard to the above comments, please contact our District Layout, Research and Development Engineer Mr. J. S. Katz at 545-3761 j' ext. 150. Thank you for your cooperation. Sine ely, 1/,7 /C ,</ W. M. Crawtdrd, P:E.ii ( District Engineer (/ cc: Charles !Waver f Metropolitan Council Mike Reiter 1 Hennepin County Surveyor's Office Art Equal Opportunity Employer O 0 GENERAL OFFICES 17 77, nu% , is' 4 -a.%Li \...rt. 3 ii \-‘,1 .1.11abg ROUTE NO 2 rAu t-LAIIIr WISCONSIN 54701 1•110Nt 1715,1174 5211 ; LA. 1)20 i:. al rector of triin;.; City of ni rairie 8)50 3.:eltn Prairie:, :2: ;i53144 Application For Plan r.eviel: And Duilclinr, Pad Gradinz Dear Chris: Per our discussion and mcctinz; attached lz; our akcaicat.ion to be at the September 8, 30 Cormission mc:tinc, for rcvicvinz the propoFt-c: re:.lij,r.m.cat of Plaaa Drivc and to discuss cstablishinc preliminary pncis for the easterly Forticn of our site. Dan JohnsonJon5o iU be sulmittinz; the plane to you on AuLust 19, 1980. 1cerely, rry rrcchttS!t'a Vice PrCCidElltlaCO3. :';state d, cc: Dan John3on DouL LzcnCc Jim Eurity 1-115f ti 241(r) • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 80-234 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF MENARDS ADDITION REPLAT BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Menards Addition Replat dated 8/20/80 & 11/17/80 , a copy of which is on file at the City Hall and amended as follows: is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances and amendments thereto and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the \ day of 19 Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor John D. Franc, City Clerk SEAL JURAN & MOODY . INC. MUNICIPAL BONDS EXCLUSIVELY 114 EAST SEVENTH STREET SAINT PAUL,MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE 612/299-1500 November 24, 1980 Mr. John D. Frane Finance Director City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 RE: EDEN HILL COMPANY $1,500,000 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE FINANCING Dear Mr. Frane: On behalf of the Eden Hills Company and its general partners, we are asking to be placed on the Eden Prairie City Council agenda for the evening of December 2, 1980 to ask the Council to reinstate their previous preliminary resolution authorizing the use of the tax-exempt financing for this project. The Rosewood Investment Fund has raised sufficient funds to allow the project to be constructed without the need to arrange for a tax-exempt construction loan. However, to proceed in Oecember with the construction, the general partnership needs to have the preliminary resolution in full force and effect. The most straight - forward approach to this, provided the City Council would be willing, would be to reinstate the previous resolution, since as far as the State is concerned, the project has already been approved and that approval is in good standing. With the old resolution reinstated, it would not be necessary for the City Council to deal with this matter again until the permanent loan documents and final resolution are presented for council approval. This would occur sometime in 1981. Mr. John Kirby, bond counsel with the Oorsey law firm, will be • present at the Oecember 2nd meeting to provide the necessary legal • assurances that the matter may properly be handled in this manner. Sincerely, JURAN & OY, INC. Ru fi L. Prince RLP/mr cc: John Kirby Howard Rekstad Richard Rosow Ig09 'i. • JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR Tri-City ANIMAL PATROL ( THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and among the CITY OF CHANHASSEN ("CHANHASSEN") , the CITY OF CHASKA ("CHASKA") , and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ("EDEN PRAIRIE") , all of which are municipal corporations under the laws of the State of Minnesota ("the agreement") . I. General Purpose. This agreement is made and entered into pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59. The general purpose of this agreement is to provide for the joint and coop- erative establishment, operation and maintenance of an animal patrol within the geographical territories of the parties. II. Establishment of Animal Patrol. There is hereby established by the parties a joint and cooperative animal patrol within the geographical territories of the parties having such purposes and objects as are set forth herein and which shall be known as the Tri-City Animal Patrol, hereinafter referred to as the "Patrol". III. Purposes and Objects of the Patrol. The purposes and objects of the Patrol are to render the following services within the geographical areas of the parties: Investigate violations of, enforce and assist in the enforcement of the ordinances of the parties and other laws relating to domestic animals, take into custody such domestic animals which are in violation of any such ordinances or laws, including, but not limited to, registration or licensing provisions thereof, and to assist public safety or police officers of each party to issue citations or make arrests of any persons violating any such ordinances or laws. 8i IV. 4 Purchase of Equipment. EDEN PRAIRIE shall upon commencement of operations purchase the following equipment: Truck-van type, equipped $7750.* Two-way radio 1300.* Uniforms 400.* *Estimated noximum costs subject to advertiscmalt for bids when required by law. Such equipment shall be purchased and initially paid for by EDEN PRAIRIE which shall be reimbursed to the extent of one- third of the cost thereof by CHANHASSEN and one-third of the cost thereof by CHASKA. Reimbursements of such amounts to EDEN PRAIRIE shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt by said parties of a statement of the amount due from EDEN PRAIRIE. ( -2- V. Employees. EDEN PRAIRIE shall employ one person who shall devote his entire work time to the duties of the Patrol. EDEN PRAIRIE may also employ from time to time such person or persons on a part-time basis and as shall be deemed necessary for providing the services described herein. Such part-time employees may, in addition to their part-time employment by EDEN PRAIRIE, be employees of other parties hereto. EDEN PRAIRIE shall provide worker's compensation insurance with respect to such full-time and part-time employees. Each party shall have the right to direct the performance by any person performing duties as such full-time or part-time employee in furtherance of the purposes of the Patrol while such person is performing such duties within the geographic limits of such a party. In the event any person performing duties as such full-time or part-time employee in furtherance of the purposes of the Patrol, acts or fails to act in such a manner that such acts or failure to act shall result in personal liability for damages, including but not limited to, punitive or exemplary damages, of such person to another for which such person shall be entitled to indemnity pursuant to M.S. Section 466.07 or any other law from any of the parties hereto and the payment of such indemnification is not covered by proceeds from any insurance policy or policies of any party hereto, such person shall be deemed for purposes of indemni- fication under said M.S. Section 466.07 or other law, the employee • of the party in whose geographic area the act was performed or should have been performed and such party shall be solely liable and obligated for payment to such person of any such amount in indemnification. VI. Payment of Operating Costs. Operating costs shall include all non-capital costs for th'z maintenance and operation of the Patrol, including but not limited to, gasoline, oil, lubricants, parts, repairs, labor and service for any vehicles employed in such operation, salaries and other direct payments to persons for work or labor in performance of the services furnished by the patrol, indirect costs incurred in the employment of persons for the performance of such services, such as taxes, unemployment compen- sation, workers' compensation, insurance benefits paid to or accrued for such employees and any other costs attributable to such employment. Operating costs shall be borne by and charged to each party in proportion to the time expended by the Patrol in the geographical limits of each party. All operating costs incuzrc•c] or expended by or for the Patrol shall be initially paid by EDEN PRAIRIE, which shall be reimbursed for the shares of the operating costs to be borne by CHANHASSEN and CIIASKA as hereinafter provided. 2111 -3- VII. Estimated 'Monthly Operating Costs. The estimated monthly operating costs for the Patrol is $1,825.00 as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. It is further estimated that the shares of the estimated monthly operating costs to be paid by each party are as follows: EDEN PRAIRIE - 50%, CHANHASSEN - 25%, CHASKA - 25%. VIII. Annual Estimated Operating Costs. On or before the 1st day of Septcn er of each year EDEN PRAIRIE shall prepare an estimate of the annual operating costs, together with an estimate of the share thereof to be apportioned to each party in accordance with the provisions hereof and such estimates shall be submitted to the City Managers of CHANHASSEN and CHASKA. One-twelfth of the share of the estimated annual costs of each party shall con- stitute the estimated monthly costs of such party. IX. Interim Adjustments of Estimated Monthly Costs. The estimated monthly operating costs for the Patrol and the share thereof allocated to each party hereto may be adjusted from time to time on the basis of the actual costs incurred and the time expended by the Patrol within the geographical limits of each party hereto. In the event of an adjustment of the monthly operating costs there shall be furnished to each party a computation of such adjusted estimated monthly operating costs and allocation, together with a summary of the costs and charges as well as of the time expended in the Patrol in each community on which such adjustment and allocation is based. X. Payment of Estimated Monthly Operating Costs. On or before the commencement of operations by the Patrol, EDEN PRAIRIE shall submit a bill to each other party for its share of the estimated monthly operating costs for the month, or portion thereof, following commence- ment of the operation of the Patrol, and on or before the 1st day of each month thereafter, EDEN PRAIRIE shall submit to each of the other e parties a bill for that party's share of the estimated monthly oper- ating costs for that month. The amount of any such bills shall be paid to EDEN PRAIRIE on or before the 15th day of the month for which the share of the estimated monthly cost is billed. XI. Annual Adjustment and Payment of Actual Costs. At the end of each year EDEN PRAIRIE shall compute the total amount of oper- ating costs, the total hours of operation of the Patrol, and the number of hours of operation of the Patrol within the geographical limits of each party. The amount of operating costs chargeable to each party shall be determined in the same ratio as the number of hours of the Petrol expended in each community bears to the total number of hours expended. In the event the share of esti- mated operating costs paid by CHANHASSEN or CHASKA during the preceding year exceed the actual costs thus determined to be chargeable to each such party, such amount shall be paid by -4- EDEN PRAIRIE to such party. In the event the share of estimated operating costs paid by CHANHASSEN or CHASKA during the preceding year are less than the actual operating costs chargeable to either, such additional amounts shall be paid to EDEN PRAIRIE. Notice of the annual adjustment shall be given to CHANHASSEN and CHASKA on or before February 1 of each year and the amount to be paid to each or by each shall be paid on or before the 15th day of February of such year. XII. Purchase of any equipment in addition to that described herein and employment of any persons described herein shall be subject to the approval of each party hereto. The making of contracts for and purchase of equipment and the expenditure of funds therefor, and for the operation of the Patrol in accordance with procedures established by law is hereby auth- orized by each party hereto. XIII. Costs Incurred With Respect to Dog Pounds. Each party shall pay such fees to dog pounds, veterinarians, and other expenses attributable to the keeping, maintenance or destruction of any animals which have been taken into custody within the geographical limits of such party. XIV. Duration and Termination of Agreement. This agreement shall continue in effect until January 1, 1982 and thereafter from year to year. In the event a party desires to. terminate the agreement on January 1, 1982 or on or before January 1 of any year thereafter, it shall give notice in writing to the other parties hereto of its intention to do so on or before October 1 of the year preceding such January 1. • XV. Dissolution and Distribution of Assets. In the event of the termination of this agreement all of the property and equip- ment utilized by the Patrol for which two or more parties con- tributed to the capital costs, shall be sold and the proceeds distributed to such parties in proportion to the percentage of their contributions. This agreement executed by the parties hereto on the dates shown herein. • CITY OF CHANHASSEN Dated: , 1980. By Its Mayor • hli- By -5- CITY OF CIthSKA Dated: , 1980 By Its Mayor By Its City Manager CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Dated: , 1980 By Its Mayor By Its City Manager 29I� EPtJ1P,IT "A" • CHA' SSEN, CHASKA, & EDEN PRAIRIE • Projected Animal Patrol Costs • • Salary (est. 6.78/hour) $14,100 • Workman's compensation 2.10% 292 Liability insurance 1.00% 141 Health/life insurance 1,092 Retirement 11.65% 1,639 Total 14.75% $17,164 Vehicle operating costs 25,000 MI x .15/MI 3,750 Pager 144. Program promotion and equipment replacement 750 Uniform allowance $100 (not first year) --- Operating costs $21,908 $21 908 Cost per regular patrol hour = 1,8g = $12.00/hour Capital costs Vehicle equipped $7,750 Radio I,300 Original uniform 400 9,450 Special calls 2 hours @ time and 1/2 = 20.34 add 14.75% 3.00 Vehicle cost. 1.66 25.00/call Additional data: • The capital cost would be shared between the three communities as a "one time" charge. The hours of patrol are computed as follows: • 2080 hours (52 weeks x 5 days/week x 8 hours/day) -80 vacation -96 sick -80 holiday 1824 hours of patrol The program does not provide for additional patrol during periods of vacation, sickness or on days designated as holidays. The vehicle cost is estimated. Actual cost for this item as well as ( other items would be adjusted to actual at the end of each year. Kennel expenses are expected to be 5.00/day per animal and would be charged to the community where the animal was impounded. I ' 295 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources-Commission , • THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert,.Director of Community Services DATE: November 25, 1980 SUBJECT: Park Use Ordinance Attached is a copy of the revised Park Use Ordinance that has been developed by Community Services staff and the City Attorney after • suggestions from the City Council at their November 4, 1980 meeting. This revised ordinance has removed all duplication of existing Minnesota Statutes (see the attached Minnesota Statutes). The ordinance has also eliminated many of the restrictions that would help to eliminate problems that we might anticipate in the future but that are not oxisiting presently. The Council suggested that the previous draft was far too restrictive and staff agrees that if problems arise that are not covered by this ordinance, it can always be amended in the future. Due to the number of people that this ordinance will affect, the City Council suggested that this ordinance be included in the next HAPPENINGS, with information on when the Council will be acting on this ordinance. Staff would request that the City Council give this ordinance a first reading on December 2 and publish this ordinance in the December/January issue of the HAPPENINGS. BL:md 2916 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 030-27 AN ORDINANCE GOVERNING PARKS UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Section 1. Purse. The purpose of this ordinance is to secure the quiet and orderly use and enjoyment of the public parks of the City of Eden Prairie. Section 2. Definitions. For the purposes of this ordinance, the following terms shall have the following meanings: (a) City means the City of Eden Prairie; (b) Director means the person holding the position of Director of Community Services of the City; • (c) Motor Vehicle means every vehicle which is self-propelled. Motor vehicle does not include a vehicle moved solely by human power; ( (d) Park means any open or enclosed land and improvements or facility wherever located which is owned,leased,operated, or controlled by the City,and which is reserved,designated or used for a playground, picnic area,beach,or other recreational facility,and waters surrounded by parks,and/or adjacent to beaches which are delineated as swimming areas by placement of marker buoys; (e) Person means any natural person,partnership,association, corporation,or other organization; (f) Pet means any domesticated small animal including but not limited to dogs,cats and birds,kept by a person for pleasure or utility; • (g) Recreational Motor Vehicle means a snowmobile,mini-bike, go-cart,and all terrain vehicles; (h) Roadway or Street means that portion of a way or path improved for vehicular traffic,exclusive of the sidewalk or shoulder; (i) Vehicle means every device in,upon or by which any person or property is or may be transported or dawn upon a hil;hway, except devices used exclusively upon stationary rail or tracks; (j) Watercraft means any contrivance used or designed for navigation on water. Section 3. hours of ( (oration. Parks shall be operated from 6 a.m.to 10 p.m. cacti day and shall be closed from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m.each day,or as posted. 2)r'1 -2 • - Section 4. It shall be unlawful for any person in a park to: (a) Camp in or erect or maintain a tent or other shelter when a park is dosed,except fish or dark houses on park waters or as authorized by permit; (b) Swim in waters, use or occupy a beach or other play areas of any park at any time such park is closed or during such time as such beach or play area is dosed pursuant to notice posted by the Director; (c) Practice or engage in golf or golfing,except in areas designated by the Director; (d) Start or permit a fire to burn,except in areas designed for such purposes and then only in fire rings, fire scars,portable • stoves,or grills. Any person who starts or permits a fire to burn as authorized in this section shall extinguish it completely before leaving the park and shall dispose of the residue or refuse therefrom in a trash container. Smoking of cigarettes, cigars or pipes shall not constitute a fire as that term is used herein; (e) Kill, trap,pursue,catch or remove any wildlife,except as may be authorized by permit; (f) Introduce any plant into a park,except as authorized by permit; ( (g) Permit a pet to enter or go upon beaches,buildings,structures, skating rinks or cross country ski trails; (h) Operate any motor vehicle,except on streets,roadways or parking areas and recreational motor vehicles in those areas designated by the Director; (i) Operate a vehicle at a speed in excess of 20 miles per hour or posted speed limits; (j) Park or leave a motor vehicle standing in other than an established or designated parking area,or violate posted directions or instructions of any park attendant at a designated parking area; • (k) Launch any watercraft upon any waters, except at posted launch areas; launch, dock,operate,store or keep any boat of any kind, while the park is dosed; • (1) Fish on or from a beach, in waters delineated as swimming areas by placement of buoys or in waters within 100 feet thereof; • (m) Cut a hole in the ice of any park waters larger than 12"in diameter, except a hole covered by a fish or dark house,provided tthat upon removal of the f ish or dark house such hole is secured in such a manner as to prevent a person from falling into it,and except as authorized by permit; • • 2 t7 -3- (n) Race, use a sled, toboggan,hockey stick or puck in or on skating rinks,provided,nothing herein shall prohibit the use . of hockey sticks and pucks in hockey rinks; (o) Ride or permit a horse tinder such person's control on or in any park of five acres or less,a public beach, improved picnic area or ball or play field,except on or in any street, shoulder or ditch thereof, trail,or other area designated by the Director, provided however,whenever a trail through a park for riding horses has been designated by the Director,the riding of a horse in such park or the bringing into such park of a horse shall be limited to such trail. (p) Serve,possess,or consume any alcoholic beverage in areas prohibited by the Director,notice of which is posted in such areas. Section 5. Permits. ' (a) Wherever in this ordinance provision is made for authorization of an activity by permit, the granting and issuance of such permit shall be by the Director; (b) A person seeking issuance of a permit shall file an application with the Director. The application shall state: (i) Name and address of the applicant and the person sponsoring the activity if any; (ii) The activity,time and area for which a permit is requested; (iii) An estimate of the anticipated attendance,if applicable; (iv) Any other information which the Director shall find reasonably necessary for a determination as to whether a permit should be issued. • (c) The Director shall issue a permit when he determines that: (i) The proposed activity or use will not interfere with or detract from the promotion of public health,welfare, safety,recreation or public enjoyment; (ii) The proposed activity will not entail unusual,extraordinary, • or burdensome expense for police protection by the City;and (iii) Any facilities desired have not been reserved for some other use at the time sought by applicant. Section G. Enforcement. Any person who violates or fails to comply with any provision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a petty misdemeanor. Section 7. Severability. If any provision or provisions of this ordinance arc declur ed unconstitutional by a competent court,said decisions shall not affect any other part or portion of this ordinance. • zalq • STA'PU 11 OR mum. 0101NANC1:5 APPLICABLE TO PARKS AND PARK AC'1'IVITIIS Minnesota Statutes, Sections 88.16--Starting Fires 88.]9--Drop Matches, Ashes, etc 609.224--Assault 609.52--Theft 609.576--Negligent Fires 609.595--Damage to Property 609.68--Litter 609.72--Disorderly Conduct 609.74--Nuisance City Ordinances Nos. 250--Food Handling License 257--lignway Traffic Regulations Act 337—Firearms and Dangerous Weapons 134--Dogs Running at Large • • • • • 2q26 ODIC Starting firer; 00 rapt trio; Ieelorratore; burning ban Subdivision 1. Except ns provided In subdivision 2, 1l shrill i.e unlovfot, when ILr•t:rmuml Iv uul suew,eoverel,in oily',hire whew there ere 'binding or growing utilise coniferous trees,or In'tress of ground n mil widbit nnttrnl curdlerous trees Lave tom rut,or when,(Mere II IT I.Im:L big!:of'melt trees,or notice brush,(Luber,she-billies this tot,or coest sled stumps,or wie ee there Is pent or pent routs rvruvrdrd or growing,to shirt or hum rimy open fire Willi- , out the written permission of the commissioner or olher_nothorlietl forest of- ficer. Sins'.2. No permit Is required for the following open fires: no A cooking or'tenant rig fire contained In a firrpince, fire-ring„charcoal grill,porNddc tans or liquid levied camp stove tin other similar contolner or device designed for the purpose of rmuking or heating,or If the :urn within a radios of five feet of the(ire is ressuunt,ly clear of nit combustible material. (b)The horning of gross, leaves, rubhIsi, garbage, ben ncbcs, hod similar combtrillLle material In on approved iurinerntor. Sri approved Incinerator • shalt be constructed of fire resistant nmte•rinl,Love n capacity of ill least three bushels,be malnlmh;rd with n minimum hurtling capacity of ut.least two bush- els,nod hove n cuvrr wbirh is closed when is use and opculogs In the lop or sides of one inch maximum dimnc(er. No combustible material shall be near- er than three feet to the burner or incinerator svbcu in site. • Subd.3. The occupant of any premises upon which any nnnuthnrized fire Is burning to the vicinity of forest'ands, %Mettler the fire was started by • him or otherwise,shsil promptly report the fire to the commissioner, or to the nearest forest officer or fire warden. Failure to mnke this report shall be deemed a violation of sections S3.03 to SS.22 and the occupant of the prem- ises shalt be deemed prima facie gait ly of negligence if the unreported fire spreads from (te premises to lite damage,toss,or Injury of the state or nay person. Amended by Laws 197f1,c.733,!3,eff.April 0,1978. • 1918 Amendment. Revised this see- norm For termer text ace main volume. • • 88.19 Neglect or refusal to perform duty Every forestry employee of the state who shall unjustifiably refuse or neglect to perform his duty; every person who shall kindle a fire on or near forest, brush, or prairie land and leave it unquenched, or be a party thereto, or who shall set fire to brush, stumps, dry grass, field stubble, leaves, peat, rubbish, garbage, branches and slashings, or other material, and fail to extinguish the same before it has endangered the property of an- other; every person who shall negligently or carelessly set on fire,or cause to be eel on fire, any woods,prairie, or other com- bustible material, whether on his own land or not, by means whereof tie property of :mother shall be endangered, or who • - shall negligently suffer any fire upon his own lamps to extend beyond the limits thereof; every person who shall use other than incombustible wads for firearms, or carry a naked fetch, fire- brand, or exposed light in or near forest land,or who, upon any such land or in the vicinity thereof,or on or along any public or private road, trail, path, raiiroatl right-of-way or roadbed, or other public or private way of any hind running over or along or • in the vicinity of:any such land,shall throw or drop any burning • match, :ashes of pipe, lighted cigar, or cigarette, or any other burning substance,and w'llu fails to extinguish the same imuiedi- ately; every person wvho thrives upon o• ever forest lands in a motor vehicle with all open cut-out or wilhuut a nnrfflcr on the exhaust pipe; and covey person who operates a tractor, chain- saw, stealth or init 'rird Combustion engine ill forested areas not equipped In prevent fires, shall he guilty of a misdemeanor; and, on cunviclion thereof, punished by a fine of not loss than $25 and not exceeding $100 and ousts of prosecution, or by inn- prisomnent in the county jail for not less than ten and not ex- ceeding 9.0 days, ?a n t Amended by Laws 1(193.c.I•If.§IS,off.Aprils,1%?. • • 609.224 Assault In the fourth degree,Whoever does duos nny of the following commits nu assault and is guilty of a ncisdenur:utrtr; •. (1) Hues nu act with intent to omse fear to another of immediate bodily • harm or death; or (2) intentionally inflicts or nttemlds to inflict bodily harm upon another. Added by Laws 1979,c.255,47. ' ... 609.52 Theft • Subdivision I. Dettnitlons. In this section: (1)"Property" means all forms of tangible property,whether real or per- sonal,without limitation including documents of value,electricity,gas,water, corpses,domestic animals,dogs,pets,fowl,and heat supplied by pipe or con duct by municipalities or public utility companies and articles, as defined In clause (4), representing trade secrets,which articles shalt be deemed for the purposes of Extra Session Laws 1007, Chapter 15 to include any trade secret represented by such article. (2)"Movable property"Is property whose physical location can be changed, including without limitation things growing on, affixed to or found in land. (3)"Value" nieces tire'r'loIl market value at the time of the theft.or If the retail market value cannot be ascertained,the cost of replacement of the , property within a reasonable time after the theft,or In the ease of a theft or the making of a copy of an article representing a trade secret,where the retail tnnrket retire or replacenleet cost cannot be ascertained, any reason• able value representing the tlaninge to the owner which he has suffered by reason of losing nn advnutuge over those who do not know of or use the Irode secret. Porn theft committed within the meaning of subdivision 2, clause (5), (a)and (h),If the property has been restored io the owner,"vat. tie"means the value of the use of the properly or the damage which it sus.' Intend,whichever is greater,while the owner cams deprival of Its possession, but not exceeding the value otherwise provided herein. (4)"Article" means any object, material, device or substance, Including any writing, record, recording. drawing. sample specimen, prototype, model, • Photograph, micro•ergenlstn, blueprint or amp, or any copy of any of the foregoing. (5)"ftepreserthng" means describing. depicting, containing, constituting, reflect lug or recording. (a)"'grade :'tenet" means tine whole or any portion et anc formula, mit- tens, device or conrillai bon of any scientific or technical Information which is secret, Is of cahre and has not boon published or otherwise become it plot- ter of grnerni public knowledge: nod an article representing a trade l,ccret shall lie presumed to be secret nod not to have been published on otherwise become a nuitter of general public t,newfedge when the owner narks it as a t rode srrret and td:es measures to preserve Its nrrecy and to prevent It from becoming: Renll:ble to persons other than tIore selected by the nastier to have controlled access thereto for purposes of the owner's bosiuess, . ' (7)"Copy"mein%any facsimile, replica, photograph or other rep rorluction of no article, mud any note, drawing or sketch tirade of or front no article while in the presence of such article. (ii)"grope ty of another" includes property In which the actor by roomer Of tills n Ilea, pledge, bailment, ar Lena' or other subnniinate Intvrost, and property of it I':netnetsidp of which the :icier in it mender, unless the velar nail the victim are husband:end wife. It dues runt Include property in which the n,tmr nserrly lit ttoenl faith n claim its a collection fee or comnrhslen not 213.22 . • . 2. 0 7.6 t ' lz.,,,, 7„..•-j t-7-N[i ,i "Z -4 .'-2 K E.: •.: . . 1":f;i: .5 . ci: eg41 ::: “"; ; % .p.''.. . ,, .,-:.„, .i, I'l c:ft: :e'...,:1, ,!1= . :F.. -i, f,') t :..-;J: : •'; r ,l'ilf] •:, ; . .FN2:4 0 '• 51 a ,,: „,f,.,:, -.,, ,,--..5i; ,- ,,,- .....,-,--Hii.0' . ...?: f..:-s.': ..---.--.;...,,, -p.,...", g.:::, !..,.-::: ,- e: g6.,.-- g c`.5 ,:h . : "'..i '::•,7;_,% -.' °•;;•.: t.- . g ' ..-1‘.',. .7, 5--] E r--.-2 . '•-•' 27-2 ,°. i,,,:,.; .Et - ..- .),.h, 7 t u°7.1.i.H7...! 6. 51, ...v.:.-_i . (4) 4.-:17E ,.2. gEIS: --.-Kf.'"r Z , '; '2gf...;.g2 78 "...--; El" ; '..•.-'111-P,L:'?..2 •• .::5.-.; '-q -.7: , P..i.5“. , . =•- t: ' :! ,,- 2 . 2E 22 ... 2.- -,'..-- 7'4.--;.. .-w -,--,...- ... ..E403 •:.: ,• !., ...-,0z,t .. .c,• is..1-- co ... ,,.. u,...., -.. 0- - -,. ' ,.. --, - ..g. , . =- et•L-5;57:--', z 0.5. '•.,:-;•;: F. f,,, ;"•:: „:7...›. ° t- "t, -'2',., 7z4,::t;;;!,1[-,4-.;•, :....5.. 6' gt.P:' 0 7. !.. .. ' 4'.:;`='•-i-S : -:%0 f.'c't .L-;--. : 7 .7 7-:''.- :2-.. 0.5 .t,,••'.11",. . .: •.,;E• . `. , ,t;g .-i-f•-:,,-;1.,21,' 1.- 0.3, .=F: ,- ,, 7,, ,L., ? :..:A.-;, •:if,t, r.., ,i,.. .6..g.f. ....:-.1 ';;1,g. 6 'f::.6E.T., .5,.."--..t.F.,'; 1.':...‘".; .... ,,:r1.°. t. .L.: Fl...S'.9. F.- '7' E0 " -',...: • f:::.4: 77.:7,-' ". e °:• :!!!.. .6, •., ,•„,„ ' ,7. .,n..7'....,,,i „,srf: ,..i.,.. ,,,..,-,•,-., . 7...2 :4's. .-,,L, L '..4 -,. :=; ,4 '-•:,-,',J. 2- = 3-5..,,L;-, ,, ri.-' N t..,,q,5; 7 'P• r,,:'-•L'--,.- -..,- ,, f. .-:=.,1-,„ -.: .. .:4•.. .....-5..-71,.. 1: 7-;_= ..3!: :,: :. •: ',: t .:.-:;. 6.:42k 0 t,:i... i:ii:‘=.2T;f:1 ; -••, ...-..'3:F.-:.,. 7,-. 3 ,:•-•Iii"-: ' S.;.2:-•;-1-•_.-Ey.-• g5.!..- t..t. E .E..di Lii*., -.:,-_zz-nf •f,-,-, 1•;2'' ',1:.:i •''f:•-•;•-•:;:lz.Fi.'it:',."-- !;2•iE.F.:.t.f-- -;' F:71-..--2 '7,-7. -'-'Z' t •ii' '87.4t- 27..1' :..3. 2.- -t ,7;',-.: F0r u -:7;4`..E2:t.1.-i:,5]:!-•21t7-1:: 1-;irTh-:-E-Th:• . t3,..2- t,' El?.4 2i-- t t °s. ag: L'f., -ii'.1.1i5.2-':. a 0' ,47.. c.•-•. . E..,,,t2.:-,,---- - r•--- -4 ,?. :-.: ti-f,••;:; ,•• 5, --0..-4.0.1g. t. :•:.. .,• "2.z---.. -.•= 2 v••= "7.'- -:-.%)..7 „rc ,-..., r3-,• ? •= 7-.... - tjt" •,°„.t.tc..cc.-,: :.-.. °: ..E.a. ..-• ?:,r .,..6 ,...C.'., E,,,,, - ° t...27-.:.t..zi s:t't .:111., ;.‘"Ii--;2" fi.ti'%5-7.., 'ZZ•-. -‘2;. „7 -:?• :-.t.,2•;•:=4;i:', '65=0=1E:4. : !;e f%•:-' 2'27.., r•it?ai-e_.;°•:-,74-_,', U 412.44!4f=.?;72.1fl-fPONT:744--d-!arz:-; Ot g 2 g!5-15rf:; ^ t1 : c4k:si • ';',E:.,75E.:::,X.: -. ,•'_4-..' 1 . .4'. :-:-: ...7 -4Z:-•4 e-iq--34 2 4' ) .2%.!1 '.2-sl: -V" w 7 ii,,,-,-'.g.222. .., . - :-..• 1 !-' .. a ;2:C,..q. ..---cdr'...F.. ...:•En.7.11:-.Eri,.. .:7; 'A :-.2".4.* • • • . • • -. . . . . "“g 7•°.q.7•5 -0 .. ,;) '2- , 0 .1?....`-. • ,...12 E ,' '! V V ' -t!. "V+•6 le 2 .0- .2.=:,., - . . . . ... .. r., 27. 2 -,', t •8`Ze, K.5:-... E.7... .2---.J.,:s 1.--.. ,;. lt!,' ;8', •...';.,-''51s... ...2i.:,..:5 2-:i:-'0;.,,.;5i:''i'i.s2.;] '.'E-';2.s?:1''t:;1zt1s,?sii21;>, -''-4tj''-: 4' 8g! 0 - E;12i' 5,7.-..EE5,:"-;t.-:..:..i...i, e••:.5:we..•.tf,!,.A.::5,:„5z!', 5.=. ;; .f1: . : : i -. ' ,, •- F' Fa! P N: s5 C:96.O.: .4; .f.“'-'•;;'.;g t,: t,..f.:6:-.-i*. :1 -4.,: ,, t. fq -.. 1_,„tt i.-..is.. F,,,..,,, I '....'52-2, -' '-:;' ''' '.•;“ .;i• -,-... '§ ;z.,;•?, -1•,, --:- •" z•-2 ".--2,••-.3 -P: t -'2 -i- t.".gn. te.:4'. 2-41:•;H-: ,: i;....., . .,g, :.r'1 , t,„ ...., F': '.,::'•D t,;...1 t. i.-•:;-i•,- ..,!: :::;`...f,E.E,Ii7; 0 ,,..,.. 6-!.-.1.,t, ff::.; 1.; ii P.,,...:.f.:..1.,K; , 0) ,t i?:' -•-•:; ::. .•,.t A.'3'06 'd " °4.11 -5 °-6; 2';•° .. . .5.: 6:'7., V. f. . L.i •i 0 r••': .: . iqf ' ': i,'2 Pi. '20F:3.:Vit'S 8 .Eir.." .° 7•-•`,'-•,:,=-.;;;:,!--',7 6.° !.. ..• ._.,-, •Z''..i.. • . a.'- • ..• ',,..t.i. 1-. g - •.: ..", . . w 2. 0 t-t-f°•.' •t•,-."-••;" '; Fi.3:':•E. .• • . .El ,:•-.‘.' '" .• ,1' .yi' ,,, -. :', -i 1 ir6 t f'i'...4-;c:•!i ?•.; .. °',.: :, i-•. ,' f..', '' !„ ,,.' ::F , E •,1 2 ,. .6-',-:E.;T• "•-..2 F• '',5' ..•:',-7.1 F. 2:- .".?"',•;' :'-!.. ..). = ,.-.:•-!2, •9 .., ., °:'.7" ••`-: i-: - ..' n .':F.° E' .- ' t F. !, S• .: `7 ; .--'t . , -•:':3 'Z'; ,..t.,',:•,: ±.-4...:' 4 8 .17 ' ‘‘ri. ° .-2 ., i,. '.. t `.; ° •' , .•.:.. ..•i r[ , 2 :; T: '. Y 1.; t . . .`i.fi'' ...j v„g- ,. 0- - - ,, . ....,. ,',: ... '... .--.: ,.. ,°-- '- i.3 .. ....,.:: 0 a 0 •;.,„.'e.,.,1::: !i ,s;,,,, ,. 1":•,.: .. '..! '- .,,.. v•:.: ..4-•, ., ,, ,. , , .,,,, 0 0 .., 2 ...,3.,' ,.., .. :: rc, g `' E -.,, , ..,:.',: '1:e ;-::". •:.:• ',i,t: •••:'t 7;:.i?1 '; ° .;•c,'.' , '8:.i i, . l - •5; ...:': c-; ....-;:; O. 0,;--•2 :i.*4 ' 'c r,z, ';., ',:, '.. t,' . I.':7, '' -;;• ".: .i'l" ,`; :: r' : ' ",•z,, . -..!". ?: ''% '':: ;: E': •L' .'7;:•.-fi '.C, "•:'•' .'; r?:3 U l'''' 4 li. . 'f*- : C6::::: 4'''' ,' :,..t •`'tr. ,-' .t,,," L';•.1 ',1 i'i-i 1;.-, ;' ''', .;`8 :!;. , '''‘' a :';:7:. r;1 . 1-i ::l• t -: t j,'. '“.% '' ! ...5e ti.''1,:: 9 g ' .1'E . ,'-'-.- ., '.14. ': !:. ', :t ';.;: ,, ,- --, ,. ‘,-.; ,1 ,7-.1.,, ,,g- . • • .7.'',. ... :IT. ,'n;r .'.. . ...,',.,. .-'-s'I ,5.1::'-':,•; f: :li:17 .1.!] ;-.i...:., 7 ,.-,; =-';! -- i';": 4: N t 'k '',:..?- '::- ', 'i.'! .::,.,, .. i.,'.''.E--:•;:t".•-', :.;. ' Pi; 2.-S' -4i j-r; ..• r. to - ••• .-. , Y ' . .: . .,;... . i• .c., , ,' F.':, ,; .... i; L,, ... .-,• • : "..,....,,I; :: , , r ' -':-7 ',; i-.. ' (.....) C - .,.,r., i";!. .,,.• tr: ''.-, . - (D, ','• ,-,1:'!'..,".77 ,' ' ' . • ,„, ' ' 509,52 CRIMINAL CODE OF 1963 (4) Tu bombs 111 iitt for not more thou ten yen en or to payment of is fine of not more tium 5.IU,ia0, or both,If the property stolen Is nti article retire• venting to molt:.egret; or,If the property stolen In no explosive or no tneeudl• my devlre; or (5) In nl) other guises where the motile of the property or services stoles Is 5150 or less,to Imprisonment for not more than 90 days or to;oyusent of a fine of riot mute than Spoil,or Loth,provided, however.In ruty prosecution under clause(1),rlo List,(2),Otiose i't)(n), (b)ninl (ci,nod eta use(4)of solidi- vision 2 the value of the looney ney or property received by the dcfeudnnt In vie• lotion of nay out,or rune of the nlwve previsions within any Mx month period may lie nggrcgoted nod the defendant charged accordingly In opplylug the ptuvl>Imis of this.subdivision; pros'clod that when twit or inure offenses sore cctomllted by Ihr same person In two or more enimlier, the accused may be pro:eentod iu oily count' in which one of the oft eases was committed for oil of the Minni.es mare;anted raider This paragraph. • Attended by laws 1967, r. 17S, 11, eft. April 14, 1f0G7; Loire 1001, Ex. Sexy.,c.15,?.y 1-3,elf.June 1,11167; 1.nw's 1971,c.23,153,elf.3lnrch 5,1971; • Lows 1971,c.25,192,off.,Batch 5,11G1; Laws 1971,c.G97,11,off.June 4, 1971; Lairs 1971, e. 717, y 1,eff. Julie 4, 1971; Laws 1971, c.796,y 1,elf. Jane 5,1971; Laws 1911,c.Son,114,eft.July 1,1071; Lnw's 1975,c.244,111 Laws 197G,c.112,g 1; LJtwa 197G,c.7S3,y G,eff,April 9,197G; Lnws 1977, e.35G,I 1; LAWS 1978,c.674,4 Gil; Laws 1979.e.275, 15. • 609.576 NECLICENT FIRES. Whoever is culpably negligent in causing a foe to burn or get out of control tinselly causing damage or injury to another,and as a result thereof: (a) A Lurnan being is injured and great bodily harm incurred,is guilty of a crime and may be sentenced to imprisonment of not mote than three years or to a fine of not more than S3,000,or both;or (b) Property of another is injured,thereby,is guilty of a crime and may be sentenced as follows: (1) To imprisonment for not more than 90 days or to payment of a fine of not more than$300, or both,if the value of the property damage is under S300; (2) To imprisonment for`not less than 90 days,nor more than one year,or to a fine of$1,000 or both,if the value of the property damaged is at least$300 and under$2,500; (3) To imprisonment for not room than one year,or to a fine of 51,000,or both,if the value ( • of the property demand is 52,500 and under S10,000; •(4) To imprisonment for not mote than three years or to a fine of$3,000 or both,if value of p,operly damaged is SI0,000 or greater. /1976c124r7:1977c3551'10/ 409.595 Ohmage to property Subdivision I. Aggravated criminal damage to property. Whoever In. fentionraly cvisg6&;name to physical properly of!mother wit hoot the hatter's consent long la' sentenced to Imprisonment for mat more that five years or to tiny moot of it flue of not store than$5,000,or both,if: • (1) The damage to the property caused a reasonably foreseeable risk of bodily harm; or •• (2)The property de nin get'belongs to a piddle utility or n common currier anti the domsge impairs the service to the piddle rendered hp them; or (3) The damage rodnrtz the collie Of the property by more than$300Ivens• tired by the cos(of rep:dr or rt•plur•cvneut,whichever Is leas. In oily prosecution cutler clans('13),the value of fitly property&Imaged by the dt•fendnei in viohat tau of that clause within oily six mouth period may ' Ir n;:gregntcd nod tlto' defoodaut ehn rged neeordiugly In opplying the prowl• Mons of this set lion, Inv,tiled that when two or more offtmmos ore eommit• led by the some peril In two or inure comities,the accosts' ant)• he prose- cuted in nay comity hi which one of the uffcnses was connniltvd for nil of the nffen=rs nggreiarted!odor this pnrneruph. Subd.2. Criminal damaryc to property. N'hnecrr Inlemtlonnlly so rnuscs snt'h Qnncige un,L•r any other circumstnnet•s Is gullty of is misdetrtennor. Amended Ip'Laws 1971,c.21,I ill,off.3pnch 5,1a71; Lows 1977,e.3:;5,111, elf.Aug.1,1977; Inwip 1979,e.:'51,11S, • • • z9.2y 609.68 UNLAWFUL otl'OSIr 01? CAltiI,(E, 1.f1'l I R, Olt LIEF., Whoever unlawfully deposers tankage,rubbish,of Ed,or the body of a dead annual,or other filler in or upon any public highway, public walers or the ice thereon, public lands, or, without tine consent of the owner, private lands or wares or ire thereon,Is Inanity of a misdemeanor. //963r2..1on/r009.68:1971 c21r68/ 609.72 UtSOIMERLy CONDUCT. Subdivision 1. Whoever does any of the following in a public or priea lc plate,knowing,or basing rrasouabie grounds to know that it sell,or will tend to, alarm,anger or drstuth orisons or provoke an assault or breach of the peace,is guilty of disorderly conduct,winch is a misdemeanor: (I) Engages in brawling or lighting;or (2) Distort's an assembly or meeting„not unlawful in its character;or (3) En;ares in offensive,obscene,or abusive language or in boisterous and noisy conduct tending reasonably to:rouse atarnt,auger,or resentment in others. Soled.2. {Repealed,1969 c 226 s 1) 11963 co 753 art 1 r 609.72:1967 c 242 II;1971 c 23 r 711 • 609.74 PUBLIC NUISANCE Whoever by his act or failure to perform a kcal duty intentionally does any of the following is guilty of maintaining a public nuisance,which is a misdemeanor: (I) Maintains or permits a condition which unrrasonabty annoys.injures or endangers the safely, health,morals,core for or repine of any considerable number of members of the public;or (2) Interferes with,obstructs,or tenders dangerous for passage,any public highway or right-of- way,or seaters used by the public;or (3) Is guilty of any other act or omission declared by a law to be a public nuisance and for which • no sentence is specifically provided. /1963 c 753 art 1 a 609.74;1971 c 23 a 74/ • • • • • • • • • • • • . )f 2.112S ME1ORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission 711RU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager PROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: November 25, 1980 • SUBJECT: Sherwood Townhouse Association Request Concerning Totlot Removal . Attached is a letter from Terri Jenstad, Sherwood Townhouse Associations notifying the City Council that the Sherwood Townhouse Association voted to request approval for removing the existing totlot in the Windsor Development of Prairie East 7th Addition. Chris Enger, City Planner, and I inspected this totlot earlier this year. The totlot structure is very close to the surrounding buildings and due to the landscape design (construction of berms) the totlot structure blocks drainage from the adjacent buildings and causes an unsightly erosion problem in the backyards of these townhouses. These totlots were required due to the density of the project and the anticipated high numbers of young children in these projects. I believe the City has learned two lessons from this project, 1.) there aren't as many young children in these projects as originally anticiapted • and 2.) trying to develop playground structures in a play area less than one acre will cause more problems than benefits to the adjacent property owners. _. • Staff reconunends the City Council approve removal of the totlot structure as requested. BL:md • 2g2G • • MEMO TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: November 30, 1980 SUBJECT: Change Order No. 1, I.C. 51-341 The attached Change Order No. 1 for the street improvement project along Anderson Lakes Parkway, including at Anderson Lakes Park, is submitted for Council approval. An explanation of the changes re- • quired is outlined in :he Change Order document. The proposed net change in the contract amount is $8,024.90, bring- ing the total current contract amount from $499,722.79 to $508,147.69, - an increase of 1.7%. Recomment approval of said Change Order No. 1. . • CJJ:kh Attachment j0 )A21 • . CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 51-341, 51-360, KOI ANDERSON LAKES PARK, HOMEWARD HILLS ROAD, LAKE EDEN PARK CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA BATHER-RINGROSE-WOLSFELD-JARVIS-GARDNER, INC. 2829 University Avenue S.E. November, 1980 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414 The City had decided to add the following work to the contract for this project; for furnishing and installing the following items of work: . SCHEDULE A (SAP 181-010-05, I.C. 51-341) T.H. 169 g ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY Estimated Unit Item No. • Item (snit 'Quantity Price Amount 1 30" CMP Culvert L.F. 15 $ 25.50 $ 382.50 • 2 30" CMP Apron Each 1 116.14 116.14 Total Additions Schedule A $ 498.64 • SCHEDULE B (SAP 181-107-02, I.C. 51-341) ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY Estimated Unit Item No. Item Unit Quantity_ Price Amount • 1 Clean & Repair Gate Valves Each 2 $ 253.32 S 506.64• 2 Insulat•: ll termain Lump Sum 1 1,339.68 1,339.68 3 Repair . CMP Lump Sum 1 315.00 315.00 4 Relocate •..nt Material Lump Sum I 28.50 28.50 5 Furnish & Install Gate Valve Nut Extension Each 1 50.00 50.00 Total Additions Schedule 13 $2,239.82 • SCHEDULE E (K01) LAKE EDEN PARK • Estimated Unit liem No. Item Unit Quantity Price Amount Seed, Special Mixture Pound 1,728 S 3.23 $5,581.44 2 2" Bituminous Walk Sq.Ft. 3,000 0.35 1,260.00 Total Additions Schedule E $6,841.44 2027 /14 The City has decided to delete the following work from this project: , SCHEDULE E (K01) LAKE EDEN PARK • Estimated Unit Item No. item Unit Quantity Price Amount 2775.502 Seed, Mixture 7 Pound 420 2.75 51,155.00 Total Deductions Schedule E 51,155.00 Original Contract Amount 5499,722.79 Total Previous Change Orders 0 Total Additions Contract Amendment #1 9,579.90 Subtotal 5509,302.69 Total Deductions Contract Amendment #1 1,155.00 Contract Amount to Date 5508,147.69' • Description and Location of Work The above itemized work is located on T.H. 169 north of Anderson Lakes Parkway, Anderson Lakes Parkway between T.H. 169 and Preserve Boulevard and Lake Eden Park north of Anderson Lakes Parkway. Necessity for Amendment Schedule A (Additions) Item No. 1 - The existing box culvert required extending to provide a safer . slope from the edge of the highway. Item No. 2 - New apron required to provide for transition to the existing ground. • Schedule 0 (Additions) Item No. 1 - Two inplace gate valves were found prior to construction to be broken off and filled with debris. Item No. 2 - inplace watermain under the inplace 108" CMP pedestrian under- pass was found to be only two feet below the underpass. Item No. 3 - inplace 108" CMP underpass was found to bo damaged prior to construction and required repair work. Item No. 4 - Four bushes in the bituminous pathway construction area required relocation away from the pathway. item No. 5 - Do to tho adjustment in grade over the existing watermaln, a gate value nut extension was requIred for access by city crews. • .2')2g • / Schedule E (Additions) Item No. 1 - Tho Park Department, subsequent to the award of the contract, requested a different seed mixture for the Lake Eden Park. item No. 2 - To provide better access to the upper ball field In the park it was decided to extend the bituminous pathway from the right-of-way to the ball diamond. • Schedule E (Deductions) Item No. 2757.502 - Seed Mixture 7 is no longer required with the addition of the new seed mixture referred to above. Contractor • ' Shafer Contracting Co., Inc. Title Date Engineer: Bather-Ringrose-Wolsfeld-Jarvis-Gardner, Inc. ( Title - _ Date City of Eden Prairie: . City Engineer Date • • •• • :: 2(321() To: Mayor and Council From: John Frane Date: November 25, 1980 Re: Utility Debt Services Attached is a projection of our utility debt service fund balance using the proposed revisions to our user fees as outlined at the November 18th meeting. This schedule also shows the connection fee increasing at 10% per year and provides for $1,000,000 in bonds to complete the current water expansion program. It also has $6,000,D00 in debt service for system expansion in about 10 years from now. The Council could have a first reading of Ordinance 80-32 on December 2nd. ( 2'F 31 City of Eden Prairie Utility Debt Service Fund Year Assessment Connection Interest User Bond & Interest Payments Balance Revenue Charges 400/yr Income Fees Current Projected 12/31 @ 4D0 Each 8% + 10% /yr _ 1979 $ 4619 80 $1591 $600* $2019 4791 81 1521 $160 383 $ 48 2201 4702 82 1453 176 376 111 2151 4667 83 1236 194 373 173 2207 4436 84 1166 214 355 333 2285 4219 85 1118 234 338 ' 538 2262 4185 = 86 1071 258 335 576 2157 4268 87 1023 284 341 614 2202 4328 88 973 312 345 653 2268 4343 89 926 344 347 691 2213 4438 90 878 378 354 730 2173 4605 91 831 416 368 768 2481 4507 92 783 458 360 806 2872 4042 ( 93 439 504 323 845 2486 3667 94 347 554 293 883 2279 3465 95 230 610 276 922 2264 3239 96 27 672 258 960 2297 2859 97 778 228 998 2302 2561 98 812 205 1037 2275 2340 99 894 187 1075 2414 2082 2000 982 167 1114 2081 2264 01 181 1152 2096 1501 02 120 1152 1102 1671 03 134 1152 1113 1844 ¢. 04 148 1152 716 2428 • 05 194 1152 725 3049 06 244 1152 642 3803 07 304 1152 651 4608 08 369 1152 612 5517 09 441 1152 618 6492 10 519 1152 618 7545 , 11 604 1152 573 8728 12 698 1152 570 10008 A *Projected 1980 • 2932 To: Mayor and Council From: John Frane Date: November 14, 1980 Re: Utility rates Our financing plan for the utility system indicates that a portion of the user fees would be set aside and used for debt service, in fact, as the City would become developed special assessment collections and connection charges would no longer be a significant revenue source and user fees would have to be used to support the debt services. In order to assure that sufficient funds will be available when needed the City should begin to adjust the utility rates. At present the rates are 5001000 gallons for water and 6801000 gallons for sewer. The minimum gallons for water are 27,000; the sewer minimum is 15,400 gallons. I would suggest, over a 6 to 8 year period, that the following concept {<- be implemented. 1. Eliminate the minimum gallons 2. Establish a fixed charge to be billed without regard to gallons used. This amount would go to debt service. 3. Establish per thousand rates which will cover operating costs and make some contribution to debt service. The attached rate structure and its effect are attached for your con- sideration. We are suggesting a water connection charge of $400 to be established in 1981. 7933 N 1,. O O 0") et O O 1. 01 N. U) N. CO N V et U) tO N. CO 0) O W O tO U) U) C) O U) , C CO 10 CO N. et )-• N 01 1.0 01 NI = CO a U) U) 1.0N CO 01 W U) N U) U) CO U) I- O 0-4 Z CO 01 01 NI M C} L W t0 N. CO CA' 0 its to to O o U) O U) V U) N 1.0 tO N. 41 v) U) C. CO Lzt O O C. N = N CO M U) 1.0 1-- N. CO C. P) 0) - O N. N O J O r _ t _ J N 11.0 N M N CO CO et U) 1.0 1.0 CO tq U) O O U) N 1, CO 01 N O Ln r et U) 01 CO N M r N N N CO d' U) U) = O i 0 CJ t LL CDn CT t0 U) -1 Or ert V U) U) CO N CO _J N N N N CO .7 el- tR CO O 0 O O CD O M 14-1 1. ! U) el' V v v LC) CO CO N N N N N CO CO Vi ( E0 o 0 O o o O o c S. <7 a a v c7 c7 c7 •.- CD N N N N N N N 1 =CL CO. C C. O 0 O O O O C. LC) U) U) U) U) U) U) �` r m O O O C. O O O X I I O O N. U) U) U. 0 0 I I M CO tO O O + r- ,-• . =C. Ii0 CO CO 01 0) 0� 11-1 3 C. ) 01 W r • to�. • CO M C. C. C. C r •- ro in M CO CO ICI' 0 O LU =0 r- •- I- CC c•- C. 0 O 0 O O O • CO CO M M Ih M M M = r •- r r r r r LU d 13 X I 01 in O inIOn IOn O U_ I N CO 10 01 CO CO + r .!-- CC C. _ W O C, N CO N COO I-C. U) 10 tO I. CO 01 O C. 0 C. O O O O C,- IC N. N. 1n 0 in 0 0 i CD N •- r r ro 0w CO CO CO 0 0 C C) 0) 0) 0) 0) 01 0) 01 5 O L D N E W CONS WATER MICR TOTAL WATER SEWER FIX TOTAL WSQ 232 $13.50* $15.78 $29.28 $15.78 $18.56 $2.96 $37.30 166 13.50* 15.78 29.28 10.54* 18.56 2.96 32.06 405 20.25 15.78 36.03 25.11 18.56 2.96 46.63 377 18.85 15.78 34.63 23.37 18.56 2.96 45.16 WSQ( 279 13.95 18.97 32.92 17.30 .22.34 2.96 42.60 225 13.50* 18,97 32.47 13.95 22.34 2.96 39.25 327 16.35 18.97 35.32 20.27 22.34 2.96 45.57 379 18.95 18.97 37.92 23.50 22.34 2.96 48.80 WSQ 224 13.50* 15.23 28.73 13.89 17.94 2.96 34.79 223 13.50* 15.23 28.73 13.83 17.94 2.96 34.73 399 19.95 15.23 35.18 18.53 17.94 2.96 39.43 318 15.90 15.23 31.13 19.72 17.94 2.96 40.62 255 13.50* 10.5D 24.00 15.81 10.50 2.96 29.27 WSQ 195 13.50* 13.26 26.76 12.09 15.62 2.96 30.67 227 13.50* 13.26 26.76 14.07 15.62 2.96 32.65 174 13.50* 13.26 26.76 13.02 15.62 2.96 31.60 235 13.50* 13.26 26.76 14.57 15.62 2.96 33.15 WSQ 183 13.50* 12.44 25.94 11.34 14.66 2.96 28.96 192 13.50* 12.44 25.94 11.90 14.66 2.96 29.52 233 13.50* 12.44 25.94 14.45 14.66 2.96 32.07 203 13.50* 12.44 25.94 12.59 14.66 2.96 30.21 WSQ 196 13.50* 13.33 26.83 12.15 15.70 2.96 30.81 251 13.50* 13.33 26.83 15.56 15.70 2.96 34.22 340 17.00 13.33 30.33 21.08 15.70 2.96 39.74 223 13.50* 10.50* 24.00 13.83 10.50* 2.96 27.29 WSQ 166 13.50* 11.29 24.79 10.54* 13.30 2.96 26.80 i 319 15.95 11.29 27.24 16.82 13.30 2.96 33.08 537 26.85 11.29 38.14 30.31 13.30 2.96 46.57 380 19.00 11.29 30.29 20.60 13.30 2.96 36.86 WSQ 255 13.50* 17.34 30.84 15.81 20.42 2.96 39.19 i 247 13.50* 17.34 30.84 15.31 20.42 2.96 38.69 389 19.45 17.34 36.79 24.12 20.42 2.96 47.50 232 13.50* 17.34 30.84 14.38 20.42 2.96 37.76 WSQ 241 13.50* 16.39 29.89 14.94 19.30 2.96 37.20 320 16.00 16.39 32.39 19.84 19.30 2.96 42.10 325 16.25 16.39 32.64 20.15 19.30 2.96 42.41 192 13.50* 10.50* 24.00 11.90 10.50* 2.96 25.36 WSQ 116 13.50* 10.50* 24.00 10.54* 10.50* 2.96 24.00 142 13.50* 10.50* 24.00 10.54* 10.50* 2.96 24.00 187 13.50* 10.50* 24.00 11.59 10.50* 2.96 25.05 239 13.50* 10.50* 24.00 14.82 10.50* 2.96 28.28 WSQ 160 13.50* 10.88 24.35 10.54* 12.82 2.96 26.32 148 13.50* 10.88 24.35 10.54* 12,82 2.96 26.32 304 15.20 10.88 26.08 18.85 12.82 2.96 34.63 163 13.50* 10.88 24.35 10.54* 12.82 2.96 26.32 WSQ 186 13.50* 12.65 26.15 11.53 14.90 2.96 29.39 508 25.40 12.65 38.05 22.44 14.90 2.96 40.30 818 40.90 12.65 53.55 50.72 , 14.90 2.96 68.58 WSQ 274 13.70 18.63 32.33 16.99 21.94 2.96 41.89 ( 544 27.20 18.63 45.83 33.73 21.94 2.96 58.63 r•90 49.50 18.63 68.13 61.38 21.94 2.96 86.28 353 13.50* 18.63 32.13 15.69 21.94 2.96 40.59 WSQ 308 15.40 20.94 36.34 17.44 24.66 2.96 69.72 307 15.35 20.94 36.29 19.03 24.66 2.96 46.65 671 33.55 20,94 54.49 41.60 24.66 2.96 69.22 354 17.79 20.94 38.64 21.95 24.66 2.96 49.57 8 WSQ 379 $18.95 $25,77 $44.72 $23.50 $30.34 $2.96 $56.80 609 30.45 25.77 56.22 37.76 30.34 2.96 71.06 825 41.25 25.77 67.02 51.15 30.34 2.96 84.45 * Minimun charge WSQ = Winter Sewer Quarter • • •