Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 10/07/1980 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL t. TUESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 1980 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayer Wolfgang Penzel, Dean Edstrom, Dave Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and Paul Redpath COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Roger Pauly; Planning Director Chris Enger; Finance Director John Franc; Director of Community Services Bob Lambert; City Engineer Carl Jullie; and Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS or BUSINESS II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Housing & Redevelment Authority meeting held Tuesday, September 2, Page 2335 1980 B. City Council meeting held Tuesday, September 2, 1980 Page 2340 C. City Council meeting held Tuesday, September I6, 1980 Page 2353 III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Request to set Public Hearin° for preliminary approval of Municipal Page 2369 Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $410,000.00 for Ryan- Lakeridce Project for November 4, 1980 B. Request to set Public Hearing for preliminaryapproval of Municipal Industrial Develspment Bonds in the amount of T500,000.00 for Hustad Properties_Project for November 4, 1980 C. Request to set Public Hearing for jrrelimina y approval of Municipal it Industrial Develonmu nt Bonds in the amount ef—$345,000.00 for Oldre • Partnershlp Project for November 4, 1980 D. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 80-22, rezoning properties in Southwestern Page 2370 Eden Prairie to Rural E. Petition for improvements on Bennett Place, I.C. 51-375 (Resolution Page 2374 I No. 80-198) — — F. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 79-39, rezoning Creekview Estates from Page 2375 Rural to R1-13.5 and approval of developer's agreement G. Set Public Hearing for Eide's Knoll, rezoning of 4 lots to R1-13.5 Page 2377 for INover�d�er 4, 19r0 H. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 80-20, changing the street names within the plats of Bluff's West and Bluffs West 2n Addition I. Final plat approval for Towiew Acres 4th Addition (Resolution No. Page 2379 80-191 City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,October 7, 1980 J. 100% petition for improvements from Condon-Naegele Realty, I.C. 51-396 Page 2380 1Resolution No. 80-200) K. Reschedule Public Hearings for Cable TV from October 21 and November 4, November to 18 and December 2, 1980 • Page 2383 L. Clerk's License List M. Resolution No. 80-194, appointing election judges for the General Page 2384 Election IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Timber Creek PUD by B-T Land Company. Request for Planned Unit Page 2386 Development approval on 150 acres of land for single family and multiple residential, park land and open space uses. Located north o: Duck Lake Trail, west of Co. Rd. 4, and south of Townline Road (Resolution No. 80-151 - PUD, and Resolution No. 8D-159 - Environmental Assessment Worksheet) Continued from September 2, 1980 s r, B. Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan (Resolution Page 2388 ado. 80-188) Continued from September 16, 1980 0/ C. 1980 Special Assessments - Duck Lake Vista Improvements, I.C. Page 2392 51-367 1 esolution No. 80-195) D. Drainage outlet for Lake Idlewild, I.C. 51-385 (Resolution No. 8D- Page:2393 196 E. Lake Idlewild Office Oevelopment by Land Sake, Inc. Request for PUD Page 2394 Concept approval, preliminary plat and rezoning from Rural to Office for development of "town-offices". Located in the-SW--quadrant of- US 169-212 and West 78th Street, Resolution No,r 80-190-‘-`PtID, Resolution No. 80-191 - prel. plat, and Ordinance No.. 80-24 - rezoning) V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 3310 - 3536 Page 2436 VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS -- t VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Appointment of a member to the South Hennepin Human Services Conriission to fill an unexpired term to 1/31/81 /lr�A•-. Pd B. Report of City Attorney C. Report of City Manager 1. 1981_ City Budget (Resolution No. 80-193) Continued from Page 2441 9/16/80 D. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Red Rock Park alternate sites (continued from 9/16/80) Page 2452 Page 2454 2. Lake Riley Park City Council Minutes - 3 - Tues.,0ctober 7, 1980 E. Report of City Engineer I. Request from Bloomington for Eden Prairie's participation for Page 2466 i storm sewer on Riverview Road (continued from 9/16/80) 2. Consider bids for lime sludge removalg 5Yi4 N Page 2468 3. Approve plans and specs. and order bids for improvements on Page 2469 Industrial Drive, I.C. 51-288 (Resolution No. 80-199) 4. Update on Water plant design Page 2470 5. Report on drainage Round Lake Park Page 2471 6. Report on deferred assessment for Neill Lake Storm Sewer project Page 2472 7. Authorize plans and specifications for improvements in the Page 2473 Tax Increment District (Resolution No. 8$-201) F. Report of Finance erector Certification of delinquent water and sewer bills Page 2474 VIII. NEW BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT. / r/r 'mil D/ 7 f-ro UNAPPROVED HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES (IJESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 7:30 PM, CITY HALL HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Wolfgang Penzel, Dean Edstrom, Dave Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and Paul Redpath HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY STAFF: City Manager Roger K. Ulstad, Finance Director John Frane, and Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION: Councilman Paul Redpath ROLL CALL: All members present. I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Chairperson Penzel called the meeting to order at 7:30 PM. Penzel requested that the minutes of the Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting held Tuesday, August 19, 1980, be added as item II and the rest of the agenda re- numbered accordingly. Council members concurred with Penzel's request. II. MINUTES OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING HELD TUESDAY, AUGUST 19, 1980 MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Edstrom, to approve the minutes of the Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting held Tuesday, August 19, 1980, as published. Pauly, Edstrom, Osterholt and Penzel voted "aye"; Redpath "abstained". Motion carried. III. MEETING WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND HENNEPIN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, AND REFER PLAN TO THE CITY COUNCIL City Manager Ulstad explained this is the hearing the Housing & Redevelopment Authority is to receive comments from Hennepin County and School District No. 272. Ulstad asked that the Housing & Redevelopment Authority also consider modifications of the boundaries of the tax increment district to include the areas north of Valley View Road extended to the east from Mitchell Road. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to amend the plan by modifying the boundaries of the tax increment district to include the areas north of Valley View Road extended to the east from Mitchell Road. Motion carried unanimously. Dr. McCoy, Superintendent of School District No. 272, stated the Board of Education of School District No. 272 has had this item on their agenda twice in the past month and they have not taken any particular position in terms of a resolution regarding the tax increment finance district. However, the comments they have made have been quite favorable in terms of the action the Council is about to take. The School Board feels that the district will improve the community and thereby give the City a taxing base which in the future will be better than what exists today. While they have not taken a particular position, there have been no negative conments on the part of +. the Board of Education No. 272. City Manager Ulstad commented there is no one present from the County, however, they hand delivered a communication from A. J. Lee, Associate County Administrator and County Engineer of Hennepin County, which Mr. Ulstad read into the record (attached Housing & Redevelopment Authority Minutes - 2 - Tues.,September 2t 1980 as part of minutes), and referred to a resolution which the County Board has under advisement or has approved (attached as part of minutes). (- Ulstad requested authorization from the Housing & Redevelopment Authority to appear before the County Board of Commissioners on Thursday, September 4th, to make the City's request known to them prior to the Public Hearing before the Council on September 16, 1980, thus giving the Board of Commissioners time to have their input to the City prior to that Public Hearing. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to refer the plan to the City Council for a Public Hearing on September 16, 1980, and instruct the City Manager to appear before the County Board of Commissioners with necessary background information. Motion carried unanimously. IV. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Penzel, to adjourn the meeting at 7:45 PM. Motion carried unanimously. y is A336 • BUREAU OF PUBLIC SERVICE. •'"" A-2300 Government Center HENNEPIN Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 J L� September 2, 1980 Mr. Roger Ulstad, Manager City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road . Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Ulstad: We have had preliminary discussion regarding proposed roadway construction under tax increment financing in the City of Eden Prairie. The portions of roadway proposed for construction having to do with the existing or proposed County road system appear to be in accordance with the Hennepin County Transportation System Study. We remind you at this time that any roadway construction on existing or proposed County roads must be in accordance with the current design and construction standards of the Hennepin County Department of Transportation. The application for and the coordination of the accomplishment of such roadway design and construction should be through Mr. Herbert D. Klossner, Director of Transportation, at our Hopkins F office. Please contact this office if there are any questions. Very trul ours, I A. J ee Asso iate County Administrator and ounty Engineer cc: H. 0. Klossner cp { HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer a33! \L-4.0 RESOLUTION 110.__ ',O-B 729(R) ..__ The following resolution was offered by Commissioner Kremer, Chairmari, Ways and Means Committee: WHEREAS. numerous tax increment financing districts have been created in Hennepin County and significant utilization of.tax increment financing is anticipated in the future; and WHERI.AS, tax Iiu.rement financing adversely affects the County's tax base and artificially increases the County's property tax will rate; and WHEREAS, the effect of tax increment financing is to shift the burden of property taxation from lroperty within the tax increment district to property outside the district; and Wilt the Minnesota Tax Increment Act provides an opportunity for the County Hoard of Commissioners to review and comment on any proposed tax increment financing district, including the opportunity to meet with the tax increment authority and present the Board's views at the required public hearing on the matter; and WHEREAS, the opportunity for County input since the passage of the Minnesota • Tax Increment Act has been limited by late distribution of tax increment infonna- tion and notification of public hearings by tax increment authorities; and • • WHEREAS, County staff is seeking direction regarding the County Board's evaluation criteria relative is tax increment financing projects and regarding the implementation of Minnesota Statutes 273.76, Subd. 4; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act also requires the annual filing of a disclosur•e'report on each tax increment. district which report provides information necessary for County staff to carry out its obligations under the Act, BE IT RESOLVED. that the Board of Commissioners of Hennepin County cries municipalities and other authorities with tax increment powers in the county to exercise those powers with judicious restraint when considering the creation of tax increment financing districts, and RE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following criteria be,utilized to evaluate proposed tax increment financing districts: 1. Tax increment. financing should he used only as a financing tool of last • resort, after exploring all other alternatives. 2. The proposed development or redevelopment should not reasonably be expected to occur in the foreseeable future except through the use of tax increment financing. 3. The estimated captured assessed value for the proposed tax increment district at its termination, as indicated in the financing plan, when added to the current. captured assessed value of all other tax increment districts in the municipality should not. exceed the specified percentage of the total current assessed value of taxable real property in the municipality: If total assessed value exceeds 5200,000,000 - I1. more that. $T5,t100,000 but not more than $200,000,000 - 87; • • If more than S11,000,000 but not more than 525,000,000 - 12'%; if not more than 58.I00(1,000 -. 147;. 4. Tax increment districts should he completed and terminated in the shortest possible time, thereby increasinn the County's tax base and reducing tax burdens outside the increment district. • S., RESOLUTION NO. HO-11-/29 R continue.' 1: .0 '""4,1'tti .tni. BC IT RIIRTIIf.R RESOLVED, that with respect to tax increment proposals which meet the above detailed criteria, County hoard input and comment shall be in ( the form of a letter by the Chair of the Board, indicating the County's overall concerns with tax increment financing. If the tax increment proposal does not fleet one or more of the prescribed criteria, the matter shall be brought before the Board in the form of a resolution for Board action, and BC IT EURIHER RESOLVED. that the County Board of.Commissloners does hereby request municipalities and other authorities proposing tax inurement districts to send to the County Board two copies of increment. financing public hearing notification and information relevant thereto at least three weeks prior to the public hearing, and BL IT EORThlCR RESOLVED, that County staff, in implementing Minnesota Statutes 273.76, Suhd. 4, shall increase the original assessed value of tax increment j. districts by the valuation of any improvements arising from building permits issued IA months prior to the ,late of approval of a district which, when con- pleted, have an estimated market value of $10,00!) or more.. Provided further, that each municipality may be granted upon request an aggregate exclusion of $1,000,000 in estimated market valuation of the improvements completed as a result of said building permits in all such districts,. and BE IT iUR1111.R RESOLVED, that if the plan submitted by a municipality relates to County programs thot would othemise he funded in part by County funds, that a variance of this resolution may be considered, and ( BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that. the annual disclosure report of each tax increment district, as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 273.74, Subd. 5, he filed in duplicate with the County Board in the form on file with the Clerk to the Board, and BE 1T fURTNER RESOLVED, that a copy,of this resolution be forwarded to the city council of each municipality and the governing body of each authority with tax increment posers in Hennepin County. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were YEAS and NAYS, as follows: • COMITY Or Ni IVIER I N BOARD Or COUNTY COMMISSIONERS YEA HAY OTHER Jeff Spartz • Randall E. Johnson -- __ .,-" • Richard E. I.remer --"• ---_ -- John E. {teems — — --- E. I', Robb, Jr ._ .._ ___ -- Sam S. Sivanir.h ___ --". ____- • Nancy Olkon, Chair - _ -�- AI TEST: • __ Deputy Coiiiitt Auditor I -ii r'L "�, 2339 i UNAPPROVED EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 7:50 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Dean Edstrom, Dave Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and Paul Redpath COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger K. Ulstad; City Attorney Roger Pauly; Planning Director Chris Enger; Director of Community Services Bob Lambert; City Engineer Carl Jullie; Finance Director John Frane, and Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following items were removed from the regular agenda and placed on the Consent Calendar: VI. A. Human Rights & Services Commission - No Fault Grievance Process; VIII. E. 1. Change Order No. 1, I.C. 51-255, improvements in Cardinal Creek 1st Addition; VIII. E. 3. Consider bids for Valley View Road/Dell Road Phase II improvements, I.C. 51-325D-G (Resolution No. 80-168); and VIII. E. 4. Change Order No. 1, I.C. 51-367 for additional storm sewer in Duck Lake Vista. Item III. 0. Set Public Hearing for October 7, 1980, for vacating excess utility easement in Olympic Hills 4th Addition (Resolution No. 80-169) was deleted from the agenda entirely. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to approve the agenda as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, AUGUST 19, 1980 Pg. 1, in the beginning of para. 4, insert "The following items were moved to the Consent Calendar:; Pg. 3, 7th para., 1st line, strike "Deer" and insert in lieu thereof "Timber", and in the 8th para., 1st line, strike 'individuals" and insert in lieu thereof "neighboring residents"; Pg. 5, 1st para., 4th line, strike "345KU" and insert in lieu thereof "345KV", 5th line, strike "Rosemount Engineering" and insert in lieu thereof "the Rosemount, Inc.", 9th line, strike "precausions" and insert "precautions"; 2nd para, strike "Engineering" and insert ", Inc."; 3rd para., 2nd line, insert ", Inc." before the period; and in the 6th para., 3rd line, strike "Engineering's" and insert ", Inc.'s"; and on page 8, in the 1st para, strike "Refine,r4 and insert "Renier", 6th para., strike "John Glogovick who is" and insert "John(B.Lkelich who is considering". MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to approve the Council minutes of August 19, 1980, as amended and published. Osterholt, Edstrom, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye"; Redpath "abstained". Motion carried. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. R^Quest to set a Public Hearing for Lake Idlewild for October 7, 198D B. Request from Joseph Dolejsi to set a Public Hearing for October 21, 1980, for rezoning of 1 two acre lot from Rural to R1-22 o?3L1U City Council Minutes - 2 - Tues.,September 2, 1980 C. Resulutions for new MSA mileage designation (Resolution Nos. 80-171 and 172) D. Set Public Hearing for October 7, 1980,for vacating excess utility easement in Olyn�ip_ic HHills 4th Addition (Resolution No. 80-169) THIS ITEM WAS DELETED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR UNDER ITEM I. E. Final plat approval for Northmark 3rd Addition (Resolution No. 80-170) F. Final plat approval for Neill Woods 1st Addition (Resolution No. 80-167) G. Final plat approval for The Preserve Center 2nd Addition (Resolution No. 80-174) H. Final plat approval for Mill Creek 7th Addition (Resolution No. 80-1752 I. Request to set a Public Hearing from Minnesota Industrial Tools, Inc. project for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $1,000,000.00 for September 16, 1980 J. Resolution No. 80-176, for appropriation of MSA funds for improvements on T.H. 169 at Anderson Lakes Parkway K. Human Rights & Services Commission - No Fault Grievance Process (formerly item VI. A.) L. Change Order No. 1, I.C. 51-255, improvements in Cardinal Creek 1st Addition formerly item VIII. E. 1.) M. Consider bids for Valley View Road/Dell Road Phase II improvements, I.C. 51-325D-G (Resolution No. 80-168) - formerly item VIII. E. 3. Bid awarded to the low responsible bidder, Progressive Contractors, Inc., in the amount of $1,244,602.05. N. Change Order No. 1, I.C. 51-367 for additional storm sewer in Duck Lake Vista MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve items A - C and E - N on the Consent Calendar. Roll Call Vote: Redpath, Pauly, Edstrom, Osterholt and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A.Timber Creek PUD by B-T Land Company, Request for Planned Unit Development approval on 150 acres of land for single family and multiple residential, park land and open space uses. Located north of Duck Lake Trail, West of Co. Rd, 4, and south of Townline Road (Resolution No. 80-151 - PUD, and Resolution No, 80-159 - E,A.W.) Continued from August 19, 1980 Rick Murray, Vice President of B-T Land Company, introduced Jack Lynch, BRW, who spoke to the modified proposal dated August 29, 1980, and displayed a map depicting same. City Planner Enger explained this proposal was first heard before the Planning Commission on 2/11/80, at which time the Commission voiced concern about the commercial located in the northwest corner of Duck Lake Trail and Co. Rd. 4, the eightplexes in the northern portion of the subdivision north of Purgatory Creek, and the lack of park area shown down in the southwest area of the project. The proponent returned to the Planning Commission on March 24, 1980 with revisions which included the deletion of the northern eightplex units, deletion of the two acre commercial area, and inclusion of an additional park area in the southwest corner and an additional park area adjacent to Edenview north of Purgatory Creek. City Council Minutes - 3 - Tues.,September 2, 1980 A. Timber Creek PUD by B-T Land Company (continued) The proponent returned again to the Planning Commission on 4/14/80 and the Commission reviewed the revised plan of the proponent along with suggested changes outlined in the Staff Report dated 4/9/80. Staff recommended approval of the plan subject to the Watershed District approval, subject to bikeway easements along County Road 4 and Duck Lake Trail, and park and open space configuration as indicated. At that time there was a motion for approval and the vote was 3 - 3. The dissenting members were concerned about the proximity of the multiple units to the single family to the west. Enger added the Planning Commission wished to have some reading from the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission and ultimately the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission recommended approval of the project on the basis of the parks as proposed. A new Public Hearing was published to consider changes in the plan before the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission met on 8/11/80 and voted 4 - 2 to recommend approval of the PUD concept plan based on the plan dated 7/24/80, staff reports dated 4/9/80 and 8/8/80, and memo from 8RW dated 7/22/80. Director of Community Services Lambert stated the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission reviewed this proposal on two occasions. On 6/16/80 they heard the presentation and had some concern as the plan did not show the accesses to the creek and the trails across the creek, or a trail from Co. Rd. 4 to the northern most park. Other concerns were the accesses to both the creek valley and the northern most park and also the size of the northern most park. On 7/7/80 the proponent came back and showed additional accesses to the creek valley and to the northern most park and the Commission voted to approve the project along with Community Services staff. Penzel asked the proponents what their reaction would be toward eliminating the cul-de-sac altogether and making it a part of the northern most park? Mr. Murray replied as far as dedication goes, they have addressed this northern most piece of property as a 61 unit subdivision, and at this point in time they would hope the Council would agree that it does make a very nice subdivision in Eden Prairie and are not given to mind right now of dropping the lots. Mr. Morin, 18520 South Eden Drive, referred to the resident's report on the Timber Creek Development dated August 19, 1980 (attached to the August 19th minutes), and presented a petition to the Council (1st page of petition attached as part of minutes, entire petition on file at City Hall). Morin commented during the last three iterations of this plan, there have been virtually no changes in the north; there have been a lot of changes in the southern area, however, the overwhelming population of the existing people are adjacent to the northern area. Osterholt stated he would like to have staff respond to the communication the Council received from the proponents last Friday as they have not had a chance to do so. Osterholt commented the Council has seen quite a progression from the original proposal to what is before the Council tonight, and asked how much of the give and take was proposed by the neighbors, how much by the staff, and how much by the developer, to the ultimate resolution before the Council this evening. Enger replied the park issues as to where the parks should be were suggested to the developer by staff - those park locations were approved as part of the park system plan and that in fact was consistent with City policy. The elimination of the eightplexes from the northern area were suggestions by the Planning Commission after , City Council Minutes - 4 - Tues.,September 2, 1980 A. Timber Creek PUD (continued) receiving input from the residents at the first meeting. The elimination of the commercial area in the southern portion of the plat was a response by the owner to the Planning Commission after hearing public comment the first meeting. Some of the more technical aspects of the plat as to where open space connection should be, enlargement of the parks, etc., were input from the staff and commissions. The response by the proponent of pulling the multiple area away from the western property boundary was in response to the Planning Commission and residents, it was not a suggestion made by the staff. Mr. Tuck, 6317 Creekview Lane, expressed concern about the access into the park from the cul-de-sac on Creekview Lane, and asked if there would be any parking in the park to prevent people from parking on the cul-de-sac and walking to the park. Director of Community Services Lambert replied there is not a vehicular access or parking lots proposed in the park. Edstrom asked if there would be a vehicular access from Co. Rd. 4. Lambert responded there would not be, adding the only vehicular access would be a person could drive to a point and park in the cul-de-sac. Mr. Tuck stated he lives on the cul-de-sac because he desires to be there and does not want his privacy confused with public access• into the park or parking around the cul-de-sac. Bob Gardner, 6350 Creekview Lane, and Mr. McLaughlin, 6318 Creekview Lane, felt the area proposed for the walkway/park would need much more than minimal grading as there are severe water problems in existence at the present time. Mr. Muehlberg, one of the owners of Chatham Wood, stated when they had their plat approved the road which was Ashby Way was supposed to be a road that had access out of Chatham Wood onto County Road 4 or Duck Lake Trail, It was not designated or designed to be two cul-de-sacs. Also, according to Mr, Muehlberg, they had an outlot next to Ashby for access from Chatham Wood down to Purgatory Creek. Penzel explained the proposal under consideration is for concept approval - it is not a proposal for specific property. What would have to happen before anything can be done with this property is that a specific proposal for rezoning and platting be brought through the complete hearing process and at that time specific platting, y specific road layout, etc., would then be approved. Mr. Selseth, one of the owners of Chatham Wood, questioned how they would access to the park as they are a neighborhood of that park. Mr. Kannenberg, 15909 W. 62nd Street, felt the 30 acre park would be best for everybody because it would be centrally located, the existing hones would have easy access all within walking distance, and Chatham Wood could use it. Some floating walking bridges could be put up across the creek and a foot path up and down each side of the creek from Co. Rd. 4 down to W. 62nd Street, which would be easy access to everybody in the area. Kannenberg added the people in the area do not want ballfields - they want a natural park. • Paul Choiniere, 15819 North Eden Drive, expressed following concerns: 1) as you see the area develop to the east, this is the last frontier for the area because if a neighborhood park is not put in now (10 - 25 acres) to serve a half mile radius, there is no other place to go. The reason why there has been so much citizen input is because of the nature of the topography as the land lends itself to a recreational area which is hard to find in Eden Prairie, i.e., use of the natural area during the spring, summer, winter and fall for cross country skiing, City Council Minutes - 5 - Tues.,September 2, 1980 A. Timber Creek PUD (continued) tobogganing, sliding, hiking, etc. It has what communities spend millions of dollars on trying to create flat land; and 2) blacktopping Townline Road where it is now graveled is not the answer. That is a piecemeal, makeshift answer to providing concept approval. The problem with Townline Road is that it is not safe - it is a deathtrap and the more it is blacktopped, the worse it gets. Townline Road has to be regraded and widended to make it a safe road and that issue has not been addressed. Penzel added if the Council were to entertain approving the area even as outlots, there ought to be a number of minimum requirements, i.e., 1) a substantial enlargement of the northern most park site to be worked out as part of the zoning and platting process for the northern parcel (a park site in the 15 - 20 acre range), to preserve the natural existing amenities of forestation, hillside, etc; 2) that Townline Road improvements not only be required from the developer, which would include the necessary grading and straightening as far as this section is concerned, but that the City conclude the connection to Scenic Heights Road; 3) that the engineering staff be directed to look at the severe grades just north of Edenview I and a connection to Townline Road from Edenview I subdivison as well as Co. Rd. 4, and the fact that trails which are spoken of as easements here are actually installed as part of the process; 4) that a commitment be made by the developer that no units in the multiple area on the southern portion be larger than quadraminium units (not more than 4 units under one roof), and 5) that appropriate connections between Chatham Wood and either Co. Rd. 4, depending on the road system, as well as the Chatham Wood and the Creek Valley, for recreational trails be accomplished as part of any rezoning/platting proposal in the future. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to continue the Timber Creek PUD Public Hearing to the October 7, 1980 Council meeting, and direct staff to prepare a firm recommendation for the Council to consider after working with the proponents on concerns expressed this evening. Further that staff be authorized to secure an appraisal on the park site. Roll Call Vote: Redpath, Osterholt, Edstrom, Pauly and Fenzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Morin asked if citizen input would be allowed. Council encouraged such input. • B. yant Lake Center PUD & Lakeridge Office Park Rezoning_ Request for PUD Concept approval of office and commercial uses on 31 acres, rezoning from C-Reg. to Office for 7.7 acres, preliminary plat approval, and approval of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Located south of Co. Rd. 60 and north of I-494 (Resolution No. 80-161 - PUD; Resolution No. 8D-162 - preliminary plat; Ordinance No. 80-23, rezoning, and Resolution No. 80-163 - E.A.W.) Wally Hustad, Hustad Development Corporation, spoke to their request for the Bryant Lake Center PUD concept approval for office and commercial uses, and introduced Tom Ryan, Ryan Development, Inc., the proponents for the Lakeridge Office Park. Rick Sathre, McCombs-Knutson, spoke to the concerns raised by the Planning Commission on July 28, 1980 when the Commission recommended denial of the project, and what the proponents did to answer these concerns whereby they received approval from the Planning Commission on August 25, 1980. Sather added the proponents met today with representatives of the Department of Natural Resources regarding drainage as they have authority of any discharge of water into public waters. The proponents will continue to work with the Department of Natural Resouces and will make every effort to come to a sound engineering way of handling the drainage problem. mall l lJ City Council Minutes - 6 - Tues.,September 2, 1980 B. Bryant Lake Center PUD & Lakeridge Office Park Rezoning (continued) Tom Ryan spoke to the first phase development of the Lakeridge Office Park and Dan O'Brien, architect for the project, outlined the architectural and mechanical details of the project. Ryan added they have attempted to work both with the City Staff and the Planning Commission and have been sensitive to the concerns of the neighborhood and City. Ryan stated he intends to be one of the tenants in the project. City Planner Enger explained this item was first reviewed by the Planning Commission at their July 14, 1980 meeting, and subsequently at their July 28, 1980 meeting, at which time the Planning Commission voted 5 - 0 to recommend denial of the project to the City Council. The Manning Commission was concerned about items as outlined in the July 28th minutes. The proponents in response to the denial asked that the Planning Commission reconsider and public notices were sent and a Public Hearing again held on August 25, 1980. In the meantime a Staff Report dated August 22, 1980 was sent to the Planning Commission recoirnending approval of the PUD Concept Man for Bryant Lake Center and approval of the rezoning and preliminary platting of the 7.7 acres Lakeridge Office Park area, subject to stipulations specified in the Staff Report. The Commission recommended 7 - 0 at that time that the Council consider approval of the PUD, rezoning and preliminary plat subject to the Staff Report dated 8/22/80 with additional stipulations made by the Commission at their B/25/BO meeting. Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services, added the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission held a special meeting on August 27, 1980 to consider this ( proposal. The Commission's concerns were: 1) drainage - whether there were sufficient holding ponds and settling ponds before the drainage goes to the lake, and 2) that the proposal does not meet the Shoreland Management Ordinance as far as impervious surface is concerned. Therefore, the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission recommended denial. Don Sorensen, 7121 Willow Creek Road, expressed concerns of the neighboring residents: 1) the PUD that is being asked to be approved calls for 2 commercial buildings with a possible third and the residents feel very strongly commercial does not belong on this site and that is why they are asking for a change in the PUD. They are willing to go to office but don't want commercial; 2) the visual density of the Ryan development - the residents feel that the open space in the Ryan development proposal could be increased by clustering buildings in groups of three around a common atrium, thereby leaving greater open space between each building area; 3) the adverse impact of commercial - noise and lights across the water of Bryant Lake are incompatible with existina residential. Asked that the Council consider removing the commercial or highway commercial use of the site and amend the guide plan to show this as only office, and 4) the amount of impervious surface - the residents feel that in exchange for granting of some variances under the ND that a decrease in impervious surface may be a reasonable tradeoff for the City to expect. Enger commented on the matter of variances required as follows: In terms of side yard setbacks in a traditional office subdivision, the proponents would be required to have a side yard setback of 20 feet minimum on one side and both side yards combined would have to equal 50 feet. If this area were platted in a traditional way with lot lines down between each building, there would be 40 feet between some buildings and 50 feet between others. In terms of parking, the City's ordinance requires 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. There are 368 spaces being provided in this proposal and there are 388 spaces required by ordinance, which would translate to 4,000 square feet of building space that would have to be subtracted out of the 77,000 square feet if they were to meet the ordinance with the 2nd phase. lit le," City Council minutes - 7 - Tues.,September 2, 1980 B. Bryant Lake Center PUD & Lakeridge Office Park Rezoning (continued) Enger responded to a question raised by Penzel regarding height requirements: ( Ordinance No. 135 in the office district category has a 30 foot height limitation of buildings; the Major Center Area PUD contemplates multiple story buildings. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 80-161, approving the Bryant Lake Center PUD concept for office and commercial uses on 31 acres. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution No. 80-162, approving the preliminary plat for Lakeridge Office Park. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to give a 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 80-23, rezoning from C-Reg. to Office for 7.7 acres for Lakeridge Office Park. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No. 80-163, finding the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Bryant Lake Center a private action does not require an Environmental Impact Statement. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to direct staff to draft a developer's agreement including the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 22, 1980, and recommendations of the Planning Commission. Further that a trailway be constructed along Valley View Road and some type of resolution on drainage be investigated so it can be ponded as on Anderson Lake. Motion ( carried unanimously. C. Rezoning to Rural in Southwestern Eden Prairie (Ordinance No. 80-22) MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to give a 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 80-22, rezoning properties in Southwestern Eden Prairie to Rural. Motion carried unanimously. D. Neill Woods 2nd Addition by The Preserve. Request to rezone 2 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 for 4 lots. Located south of Neill Woods. (Ordinance No. 80-21) City Planner Enger explained the Planning Commission reviewed this proposal on July 28, 1980, and recommended on a 5 - 0 vote that the Council consider approval of the project. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to give a 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 80-21, rezoning 2 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 for lots, Neill Woods 2nd Addition by The Preserve. Motion carried unanimously. E. Proposed Communications System (Cable TV) - 1) Minnesota Cablesystem, 2) Northern Cablevision, and 3) Teleprompter Cable T.V. MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Osterholt, to continue the Council meeting past the 11:30 PM scheduled adjournment time. Motion carried unanimously. City Manager Ulstad explained three bidders have submitted their proposals and the procedure that will be followed is that each proponent wilI be allowed 10 minutes for their presentation, after which time questions may be raised by the Council or members of the audience. The proponents are to appear in alphabetical order as follows: 1) Minnesota Cablesystem, 2) Northern Cablevision, and 3) Teleprompter Cable TV. 2311G City Council Minutes - 8 - Tues.,September 2, 1980 E. Proposed Communications System (Cable TV) - continued ( William R. Craig, Vice President of Minnesota Cablesystems Southwest, Beverly J. Land, Vice President - Corporate Development of Northern Cablevision, and Ron Abrams, Area Representative of Teleprompter Corporation, each gave 10 minutes presentations to the Council, after which time the proponents responded to questions raised by Council members. (Transcripts of each presentation are on file at the Eden Prairie City Hall). MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing and thanked the representatives from the three systems. Motion carried unanimously. F. Utility_ and street improvements on Industrial Drive, I.C. 51-288 (Resolution No. 80-166) City Engineer Jullie spoke to the feasibility report on the proposed utility and street improvements on Industrial Drive. Jullie stated he met with the property owners on two previous occasions and has reviewed the project extensively with them along with supplying them a copy of the feasibility report. There are some concerns primarily involved with the credit regarding the previous street construction which was done sometime ago by two of the property owners involved. Through the meetings and discussions,the City has proposed a credit of $20,000 that would be applied to Midwest Asphalt & Northern Contracting which would he some measure of repayment to them for their previous investment in the street and storm drainage work which has been to the benefit of all the property owners involved. Jullie felt he had somewhat of a consensus on the procedure for allowing that credit. However, today Jullie explained he received a request from the Lakeland- Vet. Company to consider a reduction or elimination of that credit on their parcel, and there may be other properties who have had second thoughts about that credit this evening. That may be the only stumbling block and maybe it could be worked out by the time of the assessment hearing, which would come later on after the project is ordered in (Fall of 1981). Vincent Manerin, 6280 Industrial Drive, spoke against paying for something somebody did for their own benefit years ago. Mr. Manerin added he has no problem with water and sewer; however, is against the widening of the road that is kind of a dead end road and the storm sewer. Jullie explained the sewer and water will almost totally wipe out the existing road surface. The standard road in an industrial area is 38 feet wide, 9 ton, designed road with concrete curb and gutter, and proper storm drainage to pick up the drainage that is not only in the road bed but also coming from the adjacent hard surface area which in an industrial area is a considerable amount as compared to a residential neighborhood with a lot of grass cover and Impervious surface. The staff recommends a road in accordance with the City's minimum recommended standards. The City tries to propose an improvement that will enhance the neighborhood and is consistent with what is required of developers in other areas. However, the street width right now is 24 feet, and if the Council will so direct it could be replaced to the width that is there but that is not staff's reconnendation. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrorn, to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 80-166, ordering in utility and street improvements on Industrial Drive, I.C. 51-288, and to direct staff to review the criteria used for the road construction as to its width and necessity for storm sewer improve- ments within the next 30 - 45 days. Motion carried unanimously. Jullie stated he will try and involve the interested parties in the road design process. .Z3y7 City Council Minutes - 9 - Tues.,September 2, 1980 G. 1981 City Budget MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to receive the 1981 City Budget and place it on the September 16, 1980 Council agenda for further discussion. Motion carried unanimously. V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 2982 - 3103 MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve Payment of Claims Nos, 2982 - 3103. Roll Call Vote: Osterholt, Redpath, Edstrom and Redpath voted "aye" on claims nos. 2982 - 3101; Pauly "abstained" on claim no. 3060 and voted "aye" on all other claims. Motion carried VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS A. Human Rights & Services Cotnmission - No Fault Grievance Process This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (III. K.). VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Request for a Kennel License from Mr. & Mrs. Renier (continued from 8/19/80) Ulstad explained Mr. Ruegemer called this afternoon and said Mr. Renier did talk to him and agreed to the following: I) to clean up the area, 2) won't raise any more dogs, 3) after third dog dies they will not replace, and 4) to keep the dogs as quiet as possible. Ulstad added if Mr. Renier adheres to these promises, • than Mr. Ruegemer is not opposed to the granting of a kennel license for the Renier's. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to grant a six-month kennel license to Mr. & Mrs. Renier contingent on the four items Mr. Renier agreed to with Mr. Ruegemer. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Renier, who was in the audience, stated he did agree to the four items with Mr. Ruegemer. B. Request from Grant Sutliff appealing Board of Appeals & Adjustments decision regardinq_HousinLMoving Permit M80-18 Grant Sutliff, 7070 Eden Prairie Road, spoke to his request appealing the Board of Appeals & Adjustments decision to move a house into the Duck Lake Vista Development. (Communication from Mr. Sutliff dated August 27, 1980, attached as part of minutes). MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to decline to review the action of the Board of Appeals & Adjustments. Motion carried unanimously. Osterholt asked Tim Pierce if he had any intentions of moving any other houses into the area. Mr. Pierce replied he doesn't have any intentions of moving any further houses although he hasen't been approached. Thus far he has only encouraged two people to do so because he felt those two houses would fit within the subdivision of a new area. Steve Mendele explained he is the one who is going to be moving the house in, and referred to the long list of things he has to do to the house within a year to bring it up to general appearance to fit in with everything around it. 23(17 City Council Minutes - 10 - Tues.,September 2, 1980 VIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Councilman Osterholt stated he has had several people express their thanks for the trails that have been put in place, and particularly the one on Valley View. 2. Councilwoman Pauly asked that the possibility of lowering the speed limit on Hwy. 5 be looked into as there have been three pretty bad accidents recently. 3. Mayor Penzel asked if active barriers could be placed along the trail and road pavement - particularly the one at Scenic Heights Road, as the trail will assuredly be used as turning lanes. If not barriers, that something be done as a positive deterent. 4. Councilman Edstrom complimented the Public Safety Department after seeing • them handle a recent accident on Hwy. 169 and Eden Prairie Road. B. Report of City Attorney No report. C. Report of City Manager No report. D. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Southwest Trails Association Snowmobile Trail Sponsorship Request MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to sponsor the Southwest Trails Association and approve their proposal as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. E. Report of City Engineer 1. Change Order No. 1, I.C. 51-255, improvements in Cardinal Creek 1st Addition This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (III. L.). 2. Consider amendment of Joint Agreement for Suburban Rate Authority (Resolution No. 80-168) General discussion took place regarding the amendment of the Joint Agreement for the Suburban Rate Authority. Osterholt asked if the Suburban Rate Authority doesn't have funds, and the Metropolitan Council doesn't have funds, who is going to pay the bill? City Engineer Jullie replied the member communities would have to. MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to table this item indefinitely. Motion carried unanimously. { 3. Consider bids for Valley View Road/Dell Road Phase II improvements, I.C, 51-325D - (Resolution No, 8U-165) This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (III. M.). 23(19 City Council Minutes - 11 - Tues.,September 2, 1980 4. Change Order No. 1, I.C. 51-367 for additional storm sewer in Duck Lake Vista This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (III. N.). 5. Grading permit for property north of Co. Rd. 1 and 1/2 mile west of Co. Rd. 4 City Engineer Jullie spoke to his memo dated August 29, 1980 regarding the grading permit issued by the Engineering Department for the 1st acre of property owned by V & S Enterprises located just north of Co. Rd. 1 and about 1/2 mile west of City Hall. Jullie further commented the proponents will be back shortly for the remainder of the grading permit after they have been through the Watershed District. No action required. F. Report of Finance Director 1.Receive the Housing & Redevelopment Authority Plaa MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to receive the Housing & Redevelopment Authority Plan. Motion carried unanimously. 2.Report of vote counting equipment Finance Director Frane spoke to his memo dated August 21, 198D, and answered questions of Council members regarding equipment for counting votes. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to authorize $2,600.00 for the purchase of one additional counting device of the type the City presently is using. Roll Call Vote: Osterholt, Redpath, Edstrom, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. IX. NEW 3USINESS A. Finance Director Frane asked that the Council amend Resolution No, 80-158, appointing election judges, by striking "Jean Rowe" and inserting in lieu thereof "Ruth Charchain". MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Osterholt, to amend Resolution No, 80-158, appointment election judges, by striking "Jean Rowe" and inserting in lieu thereof "Ruth Charchain". Motion carried unanimously, X. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Redpath, to adjourn the Council Meeting at 12:54 PM. Motion carried unanimously. ( a,3sa • • • • - , • • ,;('' . _ • • •/- r. • . . , 1 , . • - , . . L ' / • -Ic - • ,4 -_ • 1 I . 'a Reeid q la!P LiNT ' LAKELAND-VET, INC. Office 612.937.1955 Peter G.Sheldrick P.O. Box 1•B Waus Line Milton L.Bohlen 14101 Wed 62nd Street 1.800•328.0652 Dale L.Steege Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 Minn.1.800.742-0515 September 2, 1980 City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Rd Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344 Your Reference: I.C. 51-2E8 Our. Reference: 3-116-22-22-7 W. R. Reilly Et-al Dear Sir: We wish to refer to the following planned vnprovement. I.C. 51-288 - Extension of Watermain, Sanitary Sewer, Paving and Storm Sewer in and adjacent to Industrial Drive. The area all lies in Section 3, T7.16, R22. We suthd.t this letter to be presented at the Eden Prairie Coucil Meeting @ 7:30P.M., September 2nd, 1980. Under the heading additional factors paragraph B Factors Paragraph B We protest the assessment of $ 1,821.00 per acre for the 4' bituminous surface already existing on Industrial Drive. We base this protest on the fact that at no time have we used Industrial Drive exits, and also one parcel of our acreage does not have foot frontage on Idustrial Drive. As far as we are concerned, we have received no benefit from this previous improvement and feel that it is unreasonable that we should be assessed any portion of this cost. We are lodging this protest in writing, due to the fact that regretfully we are unable to attend this meeting. /7 Ord' it W. . Reilly Et-al Lakeland Vet, Inc./ Lakeland Properties Complete Line Vetennery Product Distributor )3.S1 'Prompt Semite,Competitive Paiiny" UNAPPROVED EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 1980 7:30 PM, CITY HALL (..JUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Dean Edstrom, Dave Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and Paul Redpath COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Roger Pauly; Finance Director John Frane; Director of Community Services Bob Lambert; City Engineer Carl Jullie; and Joyce Provo, PLEDGE OF ALLEIGANCE Recording Secretary INVOCATION: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel ROLL CALL: All members present. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following amendments were made to the agenda: A. Final plat approval for Gelco First Addition (Resolution No. 8D-186) was added to item VI. A. B. Resolution No. 80-187, receiving 100„ petition, ordering improvements and preparation of_plans and specifications for public improvements in Sunset_ Trails�I.C. 51-392) was added to the Consent Calendar. C. Discussion on density trade-off was added as item VIII. A. D. The following items were removed from the regular agenda and placed en the Consent Calendar: VII. D. 3. Railroad right-of-way appraisal; VII D. 5. Resolution No. U-177, authorizing tiling of application for grants to acquire park land under the provisnons of the -Federal Land and—Cater Conservation Fa—Act and the State Natural Tesources Fund; VII. D. 6. Award Linds for Hidden Ponds and CreekwoaTc mark improvements; VII. E. 1. ConsiderTids for street improvements inffipp s FhtcTie�T-Heights 4th AdditTon,I.C. 51-353A (Reso ut�on No, 80-1£1.2); VII. E. 2. Approve specifications for lime sludge removaT at water plant and order advertisement bids,-IIT__ t.37-keceve feasibility repor storm drainage outlet for Lake Idlewild, I.C. 51-385 (Resolution No. 80-183). MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the agenda as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. 3. II. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Final plat approval for Pheasant Oaks (Resolution No. 80-184) B. Final plat approval for Sunset Trails Estates (Resolution No. 80-185) C. Set Public Hearing for October 21, 1980 and November 4, 1980 for Cable TV ( D. Request to set Hearing for Lake Riley Estates Plat for October 21, 1980 E. Resolution No. RO-178, appointi�nc Lorena Marks to the Community Development [31ock Grant Planning Area Advisory Conm+ittee 2353 • y- City Council Minutes - 2 - September 16, 1980 F. ?nd Readin of Ordinance No. 80-21, rezonin_g_2 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 for 4 lots for Neill Woods 2nd Addition by The Preserve G. Final plat approval for Neill Woods 2nd Addition (Resolution No. 80-173) H. Final approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $4,000,000.00 for Vikings II, Inc. (Resolution No. 80-179) I. Railroad right=of-way ap�rai�sal. (approval of appraisal for $250.00) formerly item VII. D. 3.) J. Resolution No. 80-177, authorizing filing`of application for grants to acquire park land under the provisions of the Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund Act and the State Natural Resources Fund (formerly item VII D. 5.) K. Award bids for Hidden Ponds and Creekwood Park improvements to Brown & Cris, the low responsible bidder, in the amount of $28,980.26 (formerly item VII. D. 6.) L. Consider bids for street improvements in Hipp's Mitchell Heights 4th Addition, I.C. 51-353A (formerly item VII. E. 1) Awarded bid to Bury & Carlson, Inc., the low responsible bidder, in the amount of $18,027.50. M. Aroveecifications for lime sludge removal at water plant and order advertisement for bidslformerly item VII. E. 2) N. Receive feasibility report for storm drainage outlet for Lake Idlewild, I.C. 51-385 (Resolution !Jo. 80-1S3T-formerly item VII. E. 3 O. Resolution No. 8D-187, receiving iOe%_etition ordering improvements and preparation of plans and specifications for public improvements in Sunset Trails (I.C. 51-392) MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve items A - 0 on the Consent Calendar. Roll Call Vote: Redpath, Osterholt, Edstrom, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. III. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Renaming of 8 cul-de-sacs off Bluff's Boulevard (continued from 8/5/80) Ordinance No. 80-20 City Manager Ulstad stated there are 9 cul-de-sacs, rater than 8 as shown on the agenda, that require naming and that City Engineer Jullie has received a few suggestions from the property owners that reside on those cul-de-sacs. City Engineer Jullie explained between the residents, City Staff and the Hopkins Post Office, staff has tried to come up with a listing of names that are pretty well acceptable with one or two exceptions, namely: 1) Brittany Circle, 2) Edinburgh Circle, 3) Colony Circle, 4) Newport Circle, 5) Brownfarm Circle, 6) Salem Circle, 7) Dover Circle, 8) Wimbleton Circle, and 9) Bristol Circle. Alsn that Bluffs Boulevard be changed to Homeward Hills Road, and the stretch of Bluffs Boulevard west of Homeward Hills Road be changed to Silverwood Drive. Pauly referred to a telephone call which she received from one of the residents I on a cul-de-sac in question objecting to all the cul-de-sacs being called "Circles") and asked if it was necessary to call them all "Circles". o�t�l City Council Minutes - 3 - September 16, 1980 A. Renaming of 8 cul-de-sacs off Bluff's Boulevard (continued) Jullie replied it was his suggestion to call them all "Circles" as he felt it gives some consistency. Craig Hoffmann, 10364 Bluffs Boulevard, stated their cul-de-sac does not want to be called a "Circle", and that this would be a new policy inconsistent with the others areas and why make a policy now when there has not been one before. Also opposed to Brownfarm as one word, would like it to be two words - "Brown Farm", as there are other streets in the City with two names. Ron Newman, 10407 Bluffs Boulevard, added he does not want "Brownfarm" under any circumstances as one word; however, is willing to compromise and have "Brown Farm" as two words and have it called a "Circle". Would like "Brown Farm" for historical purposes. Chris Westby, 10456 Bluffs Boulevard, commented everyone on her cul-de-sac would like "Devonshire Place" rather than "Devonshire Circle". Wally James, 10340 Bluffs Boulevard, explained he is the one that secured the lists from the residents as to their recommendations for names for the cul- de-sacs, stating "Windsor" was the first choice for his cul-de-sac, 2nd choice "Briar Cliff", and the third choice being "Edinburgh". James asked why they could not have the first two choices. Jul lie replied there is a developer in Eden Prairie who is quite active - Windsor Development, and a lot of people associate their area as the Windsor neighborhood, and Briar Cliff is too close to an apartment complex in Eden Prairie known as "Briarhill". Pauly stated she felt the residents were asked to pick their names for the cul-de- sacs and their wishes should be adhered to. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to give a 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 80-20, changing the street names within the plats of Bluffs West and Bluffs West 2nd Addition to coincide with names acceptable to the residents as follows: 1) Brittany Way, 2) Edinburgh Circle, 3) Colony Court, 4) Newport Drive, 5) Brown Farm Circle, 6) Salem Court, 7) Devonshire Place, 8) l4imbleton Court, and 9) Bristol Court. Further that Bluffs Boulevard be changed to Homeward Hills, and the stretch of Bluffs Boulevard west of Home- ward Hills Road be changed to Silverwood Drive. Motion carried unanimously. Penzel requested staff to ask the Postmaster to have change of address cards dropped off to the residents affected by these changes. • B. 1980 Special Assessments (Resolution No. 80-181, approving 1980 Special Assessment Rolls-1 City Engineer Jul lie spoke to the proposed assessment roll as outlined in Exhibit A of Resolution No. 80-181: 1. I.C. 51-322 No questions asked. 2. I.C. 51-342 No questions asked. rr City Council Minutes - 4 - September 16, 1980 B. 1980 Special Assessments (continued) ( 3. 1.C. 51-344 Scott Anderson, Anderson Development, asked for assurance that the special assessments for Phase 1, 2 and 3 would be equally subdivided throughout the entire park. City Engineer Jullie replied that is the intent in accordance with the recorded agreement that the assessments would be spread over the entire development on a square foot basis. 4. I.C. 51-351 & 51-351A No questions asked. Jullie corrected the $3,801 amount to $3,425. 5. I.C. 51-353 No questions asked. 6. I.C. 51-355 No questions asked. 7. 1.C. 51-259 Osterholt asked if the property owners knew they were on the assessment roll this evening. Jullie replied the property were not notified this item was on the agenda this evening. Osterholt requested that action on this item be deferred to the October 7th Council meeting, and that the people affected be notified that their deferment has now ended and it will be certified for collection over 17 years beginning in 1981. 8. Supplemental Trunks No questions asked. 9. Supplemental laterals No questions asked. 10. Tree removal No questions asked. 11. SAC Charges No questions asked. 12. T.H. 169 No questions asked. { 13. Rin9 Road (Schooner Blvd.) No questions asked. 14. Ring Rd. STM No questions asked. 2356 :: City Council Minutes - 5 - September 16, 1980 15. Singletree STM No questions asked. 16. Reassessment of Dell Road project, I.C. 51-326 5 years at 8.5% was changed to 15 years at 8.5%. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to adopt Resolution No. 80-181, approving the 1980 Special Assessments as submitted with the exception of I.C. 51-259 which was continued to the October 7, 1980 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. City Engineer Jullie asked if the Council would consider placing the Duck Lake Vista special assessment hearing on the October 7, 1980 Council agenda. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to place the Duck Lake Vista special assessment hearing on the October 7, 1980 Council agenda. Motion carried unanimously. C. Request for Municipal Industrial Oevelopment Bonds in the amount of 1-1,000,000.00 for Minnesota Industrial Tools, Inc. (Resolution No. 80-180) Richard Cohen, President of Minnesota Industrial Tools, spoke to the application and answered questions of Council members. Mr. Cohen distributed a brochure and gave a brief history of his company. Minnesota Industrial Tools presently employs 50 people, and they would project over the next three to five years their present employment would grow from 50 people to approximately 85-100 people. The proposal is for a 42,000 square foot building and MIT would presently only occupy 26,000 to 30,000 square feet, and on a short term basis they would rent the remainder of the facility for a period of 3-5 years. MIT is a distributor/wholesaler and they do no manufacturing and do nominal or no assembly work so it is a clean facility. Cohen added they have not signed leases with anyone at this time. Edstrom asked what the initial term of the leases would be for the building. Cohen replied a minimum of ten years. Edstrom questioned if Mr. Portnoy has a connection with MIT, i.e., stockholder. Cohen responded not at this point, and he doesn't anticipate that to happen. Mr. Cohen stated he is in the distribution business and Mr. Portnoy is in the real estate business. They will look to Mr. Portnoy for advice in real estate as they go to sublet the property for that portion MIT is not going to use. Edstrom asked what percentage of the partnership is owned by Mr. Portnoy. Cohen replied he and MIT would own in excess of 90% of the partnership and Mr. Portnoy the rest. Penzel questioned how far in the future this facility would suffice. Cohen replied forever as he cannot project outgrowing these facilities. Penzel further questioned what the terms of the bonds would be and the length of time they would be outstanding. Mr. Shaw, Vice President of Northland Mortgage Company, stated they contemplate a private placement with an institaion of a debt approximately under a 30 year period on the amortization schedule - not less than 15 years. Cohen added MIT is prepared to sign a lease that is compatible to Mr.Shaw's ability. to market the bonds, If the term turns out to be 15 years, MIT is prepared to sign a 15 year lease. 4 s City Council Minutes - 6 - September 16, 1980 C. Request for MIDB's for Minnesota Industrial Tools, Inc. (continued) Cohen commented from the standpoint of MIT they expect to be at this facility indefinitely and on that basis they are prepared to respond in such manner as to make the City happy and allow Mr. Shaw to sell the bonds. MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Osterholt, to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 80-180, granting the preliminary request for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $1,000,000.00 for Minnesota Industrial Tools, Inc. Motion carried unanimously. D. Redevelopment Plan proposed by_ Housing & Redevelopment Authority as well as the Eden Prairie Tax Increment Financing Plan and District City Manager Ulstad explained this is a scheduled Public Hearing as prescribed by State Statute for the purpose of the City to consider establishing and approving the tax increment approach to financing improvements. Ulstad added September 4th he appeared before some members of the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and/or their aids for a briefing of the proposal that Eden Prairie is considering. The proposal was then forwarded to the Commission's meeting of September 9th and there were some additional questions that a member or two of the Commission had regarding how it would affect their 1980, 1981 and 1982 budget. Based on those questions) Ulstad asked that it be continued and be heard in committee and later be presented to the full Commission at a regular meeting. Ulstad related the question presented to the Commission was the rollback on the 18-month portion of tax increment eligibility. It is that portion that the County Commissioners, who are in a sense the auditors for Hennepin County, must approve and allow the City to capture those increments. Ulstad pointed out to the Commissioners and/or their aids that in his opinion it was a timing kind of thing that State law does to allow the City to proceed, and it is a question of when those increments could be absorbed and used to support the retirement of bonds. Rather than close the Public Hearing this evening, Ulstad suggested that the Council continue it to October 7, 1980. Hennepin County has not submitted their comments at this point as they would rather have that occur as a result of their next board meeting - they have not taken any position positive or negative on allowing the City to capture the rollback period. Penzel read into the record the handwritten statement from Merle Game, Director of Business Services for School District No. 272: "The School Board has discussed the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan on several occasions with the most recent discussion occurring on September 4, 1980. The School Board did not take any official action or pass any resolution; however, the School Board is generally supportive of the Tax Increment Financing Plan. The Tax Increment Financing Plan will undoubtedly be helpful to the general population of the City and what is beneficial to the City is also beneficial to the School District. Although the School District will originally lose some revenue -- it appears that it will financially gain in the long term. p9p If the City Council would desire to receive a resolution from the School District, please let us know and we will request the School Board to act on the request on 9/18/80." City Council Minutes - 7 - September 16, 1980 D. Redevelopment Plan (continued) ( Council members directed staff to request a resolution from the School Board relative to their support of the Tax Increment Financing Plan. Rich Robey, Manager of the Eden Prairie Center, explained the Board of Directors of the Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce did pass a motion in favor of the Tax Increment District. MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Osterholt, to defer taking action on this Public Hearing regarding the Tax Increment Financing Plan to the October 7, 1980 Council meeting, and in the event the County Commissioners are concerned about the duration or terms of the increment district that the City commit to a reasonable term and/or abolish the district when the tax increment financing bonds are paid. Further that an agreement be entered into if required to be drafted by the City Attorney. Motion carried unanimously. IV. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 3104 - 3309 MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve Payment of Claims Nos. 3104 - 3309. Roll Call Vote: Osterholt, Redpath. Edstrom and Penzel voted "aye" on all claims; Pauly "abstained" on Claim No. 3203 and "aye" on the remaining claims. Motion carried. V. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS No reports. VI. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Gelco First Addition by Gelco Corporation. Request for PUD Development Stale approval to preliminary and final plat the 60 acre Gelco PUD into 9 lots and 10 outlots. Located north of Anderson Lakes and South of I-494 and West of 78th Street (Resolution No. 80-114 - Preliminary plat; Resolution No. 80-186 - Final plat) Continued from 7/1/80 MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to adopt Resolution 80-114. approving the preliminary plat for Gelco First Addition by Gelco Corporation. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Osterholt. to adopt Resolution Nn. 1R6. approving the final plat for Gelco First Addition by Gelco Corporation. Motion carried unanimously. VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Councilwoman Pauly brought up two items: a) Parking on grass at Windslope. Penzel stated he has already asked Public Safety to look into this problem. b) Suggested a letter or resolution be sent to Roland Schulze, who has delivered packets for the Council during the last year, commending him for his past service, City Council Minutes - 8 - September 16, 1980 b) Continued MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Redpath, to instruct the City Manager to draft a letter or resolution on behalf of the City Council to Roland Schulze for the fine job he did delivering packets to the Council and Commissions. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Councilman Osterholt stated with the extensive work that is being done at Round Lake, the City might be able to add some storm sewer work at this time to help solve possible drainage problems for residents in the area. Staff to look at this possibility and this item to be placed on the October 7th Council agenda. B. Report of City Attorney No report. C. Report of City Manager 1. 1981 City Budget General discussion took place regarding the City budget as submitted, and the Council requested information on the following items: 1) Clarification on recreation programs, 2) clarification on request for door openers in the fire building, 3) report on cash park fees, and 4) 1980 Park Bond Fund. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pauly, to continue consideration of the 1981 City Budget to the October 7, 1980 Council meeting. Motion ti carried unanimously. 2. Purgatory Creek Study - Major Center Area (Don Brauer) City Manager Ulstad explained this item has been brought up before the Council some time back, and the request at that time was would the City be interested in becoming part of the cost sharing of the study of the watershed/flood plain area in the Major Center Area. At that time it was the feeling of the Council that there were other areas that were a higher priority in terms of costs to be shared by the City. Since that time Mr. Brauer has talked to the abutting property owners in and around the watershed area. The study is now totally being supported by the property owners in the area. Last night Mr. Brauer appeared before the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission, and this evening before the Council, to outline his proposal and receive the City's blessings in proceeding with the study. Don Brauer, representing The Brauer Group, referred to Exhibit A (attached as part of minutes) which listed those persons who are participating in the cost of the study. Brauer added he is certainly very interested in what goes on in the open space and has been for 16 years. He would like to stay involved until such time as something is proposed that is acceptable to the City and the people around it. Brauer would be involved in the planning process and the fee the people paid for the study will be paid to the company, which he has since sold, to do the work. Brauer would be actively involved in the preparation and presentation of it, but not as a contractor. Accordingly to Brauer this area can be as much of an asset to the Major Center Area as are the two major lakes in the other two quadrants, maybe even more. He also believes it could be a very active recreation area as well as a wildlife preservation area if the soils will support it. Brauer explained the first thing that has to be done is to determine how deep the organic soils are, and what their conditions are. r71/ I, '5 City Council Minutes - 9 - September 16, 1980 2, Purgatory Creek Study - Major Center Area (Don Brauer) Continued If it is acceptable, then there is a choice between wildlife management ( and golf, or both. If the soils are too deep, there is no choice for golf, it would be a wildlife management area, trails, etc. Brauer stated he would not do the study if the City does not think it is reasonable. Director of Community Services Lambert explained the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission felt it is a good idea to have a study of this area and some kind of a plan of what this area could be developed into. It is going to be easier to make approvals or recommendations on adjacent properties if we had a plan to go by. The Commission recommended approval as long as the Council also requested the Watershed District to do a study on what the affect would be on Staring Lake and the rest of the Watershed. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, that the City Council support the efforts of Don Brauer to go ahead with a study of the Major Center Area flood plain area, and instruct the Watershed District to do a study on what the effect would be on Staring Lake and the rest of the Watershed. Motion carried unanimously. Edstrom asked that the people who are paying for the study understand that the City Council does not honestly know what their attitude is at this time. D. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Red Rock Park - alternate sites (continued from 8/5/80) ( Lambert explained at the direction of the Council he has looked for alternate sites to locate the Red Rock Park. The only other alternate site was the one on the pennisula, which is very expensive property. Another site is the Carmody parcel which might be something to look at. At this time Lambert stated he has a call in for Mr. Carmody to see if he has any interest in selling the parcel or a portion of it for a park, but has not yet received a call back. Council instructed Lambert to continue looking into the possibility of purchasing the Carmody parcel, and return to the Council with a report on October 7th. 2. Hidden Ponds Park security fence costs Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to his memo dated September 11, 1980, adding the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission want to go on record as being totally opposed to the City's starting to build fences because they feel it is setting a dangerous precedent. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, that the City will not construct a security fence along Hidden Ponds Park eastern border, affirming the recommendation of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission. Osterholt, Redpath and Edstrom voted "aye"; Pauly and Penzel voted "nay". Motion carried. Edstrom suggested the Council could wait and see what happens, and if there is a problem the Council could reconsider the question at that time. Pauly felt corning right out with the fence is more apt to head off the problem and it will be less effective if put up later. 36/ 220, City Council Minutes - 10 - September 16, 1980 3. Railroad right-of-way appraisal ( This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (II. I.). 4. Request from Larry Heinen regarding tax-forfeited land City Manager Ulstad explained City staff has been working with Mr. Heinen for sometime on the platting of his property, and about three or four weeks ago it was realized that part of the plat we were talking about is now tax forfeited and the City has made application to acquire same. Mr. Heinen has appeared before the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission and is now appearing before the Council this evening to state his case and request that the Council reconsider their application. Mr. Heinen asked that the Council rescind the request from Neaoepin County for Parcel No. 2010 so it can revert back to him after he pays the taxes on it (details of such request outlined in letter from Thomas E. Dougherty, legal counsel for Mr. Heinen, dated 9/5/80).. Director of Community Services Lambert added the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission reviewed this item on September 15th and agreed it should go back to Mr. Heinen; however, they suggested the City make sure we have a trail easement outside the water of the creek to be used for a pedestrian trail. Edstrom commented the suggestion of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission usually takes place during part of the platting process. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to grant Mr. Heinen's request, and direct staff to communicate to Hennepin County the rescinding of the City's application for conveyance of his tax forfeited parcel (Parcel No. 2010), thus allowing Mr. Heinen to reclaim it with payment of all taxes. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Resolution No. 80-177, authorizing filing of application for grants to acquire park_land under the provisions of the Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund Act and the State Natural Resources Fund This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (II. J.). 6. Award bids for Hidden Ponds and Creekwood Park improvements • This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (II. K.). E. Report of City Engineer 1. Consider bids for street improvements in Hipp's Mitchell Heights 4th Addition, I.C. 51-353A 7-Resolution No. 80-182-) This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (II. L.). 2. Approve_s_pecifications for lime sludge removal at water plant and order advertisement for *bids This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (II. M.), .23G3 • City Council Minutes - 11 - September 16, 1980 +! 3. Receive feasibility report for storm drainage outlet for Lake Idlewild, I.C. 51-385 (Resolution No. 80-183) This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (III. N.). 4. Re nest from Bloomington for Eden Prairie's participation for storm sewer on Riverview Road General discussion took place about the benefits that would accrue to Eden Prairie as a result of this project. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Penzel, to continue action on this request to the October 7, 1980 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. F. Report of Finance Director 1. Clerk's License List MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Clerk's License List as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion on density trade-off Director of Community Services Lambert discussed the possibility of acquiring additional park land in the Timber Creek proposal through a density transfer. He talked about acquiring the entire wooded hill north of the creek to expand the park to approximately 22 acres. Lambert indicated that the density could be transferred from the hill westerly, and could be accommodated through approval of a multiple family development, possibly condominiums. The Council was generally favorable to the idea, however, they also spoke to their concern that the developer might request additional units over the previous request. No action necessary. IX. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pauly, to adourn the Council meeting at 11:11 PM. Motion carried unanimously. j, 1 -' i._i ---'----`,-fuEXHIBIT A.--ac - - L-M&.1-1----LE—--___ I. I -4 \cLe:-4-----.4. 2........."-.--- I ' . -,J �� I �° '' �, r✓1r= •ice' — Rico? ' ' •p •p rr * . 6°Prokle i. --T- ''�, k i h pTom,. y / l^y^ c.m�T ( a 1 `C ,!' Kl7 / l / —� _147 ,� � September 2, 1980 PURGATORY/MCA OPEN SPACE PLAN PROPOSAL MEMO TO: Paul Strand(MTS) ($2,200) David Owen(Tudor 0aks)($1,700) John Blanchar(Eden/494)($1,700) Lloyd Cherne ($1,500) John Gertz(Preserve) ($ 500) Ed Resler(NK) ($ 500) John Tetuan ($1,700) The Bracer Group ($ 500) Bruce Bermel ($1,700) FROM: Don Brauer RE: Progress Report I have now received checks (see above) from all who have agreed to ( participate. Those who chose not to participate are: Feeders, Inc. Ryco Development ADC Magnetic Controls Mike Carmody NW Bank Southwest (Edenvale South) Rosemount, Inc. a3Gs H , • MAHONEY, DOUGHERTY AND MAHONEY PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION ( ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS • ..ILNAIID P.MANONIY 001 PARK AVENUE THOMA/E.DOVONLIITT MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 55404 JAM[/M.MANONAT -- OF COUNSEL KLMNQM aIL A/ON t61s1 332.5063 V[/NON J.SCNW[IO[I, DALE O.LINDMAN ^� GAMY C.R[IT[[ September 5, 1980 O.P.MAN- - O.J.MANONLY U/T/•IN/I I,ANO[[S.Hums PATRICK J.6AOTLI, ' Mr. Roger K. Ulstad • . City Manager City of Eden Prairie -7, 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55436 Dear Mr. Ulstad: At the request of Mr. and Mrs. Lawrence E. Heinen, I am writing this letter to outline for you the background of their pur- chase of certain real estate in the City of Eden Prairie, which for the purposes of brevity, will hereafter be referred to as Plat No. 56820, Parcels Nos. 2200, 2010 and 2420. Mr. and Mrs. Heinen have • just recently become aware that the land encompassed within Parcel No. 2010 has been forfeited to the State of Minnesota for delinquency in the payment of real estate taxes and that the City of Eden Prairie has made application to Hennepin County for conveyance of tax for- feited lands to it. Prior to June of 1972, the entire tract of land encompassed • within Plats Nos. 2200, 2010 and 2420 were owned of record by Ellen Henry. On June 5, 1972, Ellen Henry entered into a Contract for Deed with Mr. Stephen F. Rowland, which Contract for Deed covered the entire tract of land encompassed within Parcels Nos. 2200, 2010 and 2420. This Contract for Deed was not recorded and Ellen Henry remained the record owner, and presumably continued to receive the tax statements for all of these parcels. On March 12, 1973, Mr. and Mrs. Heinen entered into a Contract for Deed with Mr. Rowland for the purchase of a part of l that entire tract. The part purchased by Mr. and Mrs. Heinen under the Contract for Deed at that time were the tracts of land covered by Parcels Nos. 2200 and 2420 and also part of Parcel No. 2010. This Contract for Deed was not recorded and again Ellen Henry re- mained the record owner. r In November of 1973, Mr. and Mrs. Heinen acquired by Warranty Deed that tract of land described by Parcel No. 2200. At that time they built a home on this parcel, which is coinnnly known and described as 9840 Bennett Place, Eden Prairie, M . �a1f. 23rr . -• - • • • • • MAHONEY.DOUGHERTY AND MAHONEY • September 5, 1980 ( Page 3 on those premises is the stable constructed by Mr. Heinen. Mr. Heinen's home is adjacent to this land, and that address is 9840 Bennett Place. Mr. Heinen has contacted the appropriate officials at Hennepin County concerning this matter, and these officials have indicated that if your City would advise Hennepin County that you are'Withdrawing your application for conveyance of tax for- feited land in respect to this Parcel No. 2010, that Hennepin • County would allow Mr. and Mrs. Heinen to-re-purchase this tax forfeited land. On behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Heinen, I respectfully request - that the City of Eden Prairie does do advise Hennepin County that it is withdrawing its application for this parcel of tax forfeited land. _ • Very truly yours', MAHO , DOUG R and HONEY . • homes E. o er TED/joo • • - - • • - • • 9 4_1 ,0•10 . . . _ • MAHONEY. DOUGHERTY ANO MAHONEY September 5, 1980 • • Page 2 • At the same time Mr. and Mrs. Heinen constructed a horse stable on that part of Parcel No. 2010, which was being purchased under a Contract for Deed from Rowland and also fenced in a part of Par- cel No. 2010 for a pasture area for horses owned by them. • In 1976, Mr. and Mrs. Heinen entered into another Contract for Deed with Stephen W. Rowland for the purchase of the balance of this entire tract of land which was the remaining part of Parcel No. 2010. This Contract for Deed again was not recorded and the • ' record owner continued to.. be Ellen Henry. At the time• that Mr. . Heinen entered into this Contract for Deed with Mr. Rowland, he was not aware that there were any unpaid real estate taxes on Parcel No. 2010. Mr. Heinen has always received and paid the taxes covering the land encompassed within Plats No. 2200 and 2420. Neither Mr. or Mrs. Heinen were ever aware that Parcel No. 2010 was being taxed by a separate tax statement. Apparently all of the real estate tax statements for Parcel No. 2010 were forwarded to either Ellen Henry or to Stephen W. Rowland. However, they were never forwarded by either of the said Ellen Henry or Stephen W. Rowland to Mr. Heinen. It was not until late August of 1980, as part of Mr. Heinen's work in developing this entire tract of land as Creek- view Estates, that he became aware that there was any real estate tax delinquencies on Parcel No. 2010. On that occasion Mr. Heinen commenced an investigation of this matter and learned for the first _ time that there were delinquent. real estate taxes on this Parcel No. 2010 which dated back to 1975 and that an application had been filed by your City to acquire title to this land. Mr. Heinen has been working with the City of Eden Prairie since August of 1978 in an attempt to plat this entire tract of land, that is Parcels Nos. 2200, 2010 and 2420 in a real estate development known as Creekview Estates. Since August of 1980, Mr. Heinen has had approximately 25 meetings with various officials of the City of Eden Prairie, including the members of the City Council, Planning Commission, and Park and Recreation Committee in the City Engineer's Office in connection with his development of this entire tract of land. If Mr. and Mrs. Heinen had known of the existence of this tax delinquency, they would, of course, immediately have paid any default. Neither Mr. or. Mrs. Heinen were ever aware or had been notified in any manner of this tax delinquency or of the forfeiture of this land to the State for non-payment of taxes. You will noise that on Exhibit No. 1, which is attached to the City's Application to Hennepin County for conveyance of tax forfeited lands, that this Parcel No. 2010 is referred to as 9820 Bennett . Place. In fact, there is no 9820 Bennett Place. The only building 1 • To: Mayor and Council From: John Frane Date: October 1, 1980 Re: Requests to set Public Hearing on November 4, 1980 for M.I.D.B'S The three requests on the agenda are a cooperative effort by the proponents to assemble a construction and financing package whereby the same architect, engineer, bond attorney, contractor, interim lender and final lender would be used in each project. Ownership would be separate upon completion of the project under a town- office concept. There are three separate requests before you, which will at the time of the Public Hearing, require three actions by the Council. • ,721,2 Southwestern Rural Area RAP CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Ordinance No. 80-22 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 135 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended as follows: The following described property, set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and' made a part hereof, shall be and hereby is in- cluded hereafter in the Rural District. Section 2. The above-described property shall be subject to all of the ordinances, rules and regulations of the City of Eden Prairie 1 relating to the Rural District. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. . FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of September , 1980, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1980. Wolfgang H. Penzel - Mayor ATTEST: • John D. Frane - City Clerk PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1980. • /2 21 l rncr 1. All that part of is Southeast Quarter of . Sout.1west Quarter of Section 17, Township 116, Rnnge 't2, lying Southeasterly of the Southeasterly right-of-way line of i Chicago & Northwestern Railroad. 1 f • • , L Tract2_ All that part of the Government Lot No. 5, Government j Lot No. 4, the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest 1 Quarter and the Southeast Quarter of Section 17, Town- ship 116, Range 22, described as follows: Beginning ? at' the Southwest corner of Government Lot No.,.5; thence North along the West line thereof distance 1100 feet; 1 thence Easterly parallel with the South line of the said • i Govcrmient•Tot No. 5 to a point 750 feet Northwesterly 1 of the Northwesterly right-of-way line of the Chicago & • . Northwestern Railroad as measured at right angles to ' & the said Northwesterly right-of-.-way line; thence I Northeasterly to a point on the North line of the said Southeast Quarter said point being 400 feet Westerly of the Northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the said Southeast Quarter; . thence Easterly to the North- westerly right-of-way line of the Chicago & Northwestern Railroad; thence Southwesterly along the said North- i westerly right--of-way line to the South line of the said. Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence 9 Westerly along the South line of the said Southeast a Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. and Government Lot No. i - , 5 to the point of beginning. 1 ( { Tract 3. 1 All that part of the West Half of the Southeast'Quarter of Sect.ion 17, Township 116, Range 22, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said West Half; thence Easterly along the South line of said West- Half to an intersection with a line drawn parallel with centerline 1150 feet Southeasterly of the j Southeasterly right-of-way line of the Chicago & _ Northwestern Railroad; thence Northeasterly along the 1 last mentioned parallel line to an intersection with a line drawn parallel with and 274 feet Westerly of the 1 East line of said West Half; thence Northerly along • the,l.ast mentioned parallel line distance 750 feet; ' ' thence Easterly parallel with the North lime of the Svathwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said ' �) Section 17, distance 200 feet,• thence Northerly parallel with the East line of said West Half a distance I of 800 feel:; thence Westerly parallel with North line f of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of i, • . said Section 17 to the Southeasterly right-of-way line/ ( . _• .. , . EXHIBIT A • • 1 of 2 • - • a 37 • / • • • • . i • . 9 of.Lhe Chicago & Northwestern Railroad; thence' Southwesterly along the said. Southeasterly right-of-' i.ay line to the hest line of the said West IIalf; $ thence Southerly along said best line to the point of beginning. ' Tract A. • All that part of the Northeast and Southeast Quarters of Section 19, Township .116, Range 22, lying North- ) westerly of the Northwesterly right-of-way line of the Chicago & Northwestern Railroad excepting there from the Westerly 550 feet thereof. Tract3,3 5. • _ All that part of the Northeast Quarter and the North- 4 • west Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 19, To:•%nsh i.p.116, Range 22, lying Southeasterly of the d Southeasterly. right-of-way line, of the Chicago and Northwestern Railroad., Tract 6_ Ail that part of the Southeast Quarter of t-he Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 19, i Township 116, Range 22, lying Northerly of the Northerly. right-of-way line of County Road No. 1. 1 1 Tract_7_ • . All that part of Government Lot No. 3, Section 19, Township 116, Range 22, and the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30,, Township 116. Range 22, lying Northerly of the Northerly right-of- • way line of County Road No. 1 and Southeasterly of the • Southeasterly right-of-way line of the Chicago & .Northwestern Railroad. Tract 8_ • All Chat part of the Southeast Quarter of. the Northeast Quarter of Section 19, Township 116, Range 22, lying • Southeasterly of the Southeasterly right-of-way line of • the Chicago & Northwestern Railroad. • • Tract 9. • All that part of the Northwest Qnar.ter of Section 20, Township 116, r ncjc 22, lying Northwesterly of the Norlhwost.crl.y right-of-way line of the of 3 Chicago & N.)0.hwe Lcrn Railroad. EXHIBIT A2 } • Tract_10_ Quarter of t:he Z;�rth- Ali: that part of the Northwest c rt cast Quarter of Scctofna2lineodro\'ipuara6lle'ingith lying Northwesterly ? and 1150 feet Southeasterly of the Southeasterly 1 right-of-way line of the Chicago and Northwestern' i Railroad- • 1 carter of Section 20, 1 Trac_t_11_ the All that part of the North�`stSouthcasterly 116, Range 22, lying of and 1 • Township line of the Chicago of a line the • $ Southeasterly right-of-way Noa n parail Road andand 50Northeasterly feet Sou h togethere with drawn parallel with 1150W3eeilS�i�tsterly • said Southeasterly right-of- Y • all that part of the West 1100 feet of the Southwest of said right-of-way Lion f-�+aY Quarter of the NorlhwofstthQue soue��easterly Section lying Southeasterly t Chicago line of the Chicag° and Northwestern Railroad. I i All that part of the West 1100 feet °Range Southwest g Quarter of Section 20, Township 116, Northerly of the Northwesterly right-of-way line of County Road No. 1 and No. 2. Tra_c_t 13_ j • All that part of GpVe116,nRanges22o-lying Northwest i Section 30, Township right-of-way line of County road of the Northwesterly rig t right- . ,i erly Road No. 1, Southeasterly of the Southeasterly J o.- Y descriUed line: .+•a line of theoChicag and ndwiorthwestern Railroad and nn Northeasterlyn - • ' beginning at a point oii the centerline bein7 of 171030e 1cago . fcet Railroad, said p • and Northwesternailtoo ! • Southwesterly of the North line of Government Lot No. r 2 a, measured along the center line of said• rline i Southeasterly at right angles tolth center line i of'th saidec j. of railroad t•oltliidN there`Lerminat•i�y: of County Road No. • i • EXHIBIT A - 3 of 3 23'13 • • . Oct. 7, 1980 • ' CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE !_ HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ' RESOLUTION NO. R80-198 f, RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT ON IMPROVEMENTS (I.C. 51-375) WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed to make the following improvements: I.C. 51-375, Utility and street improvements on Bennett Place and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and presented to the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assess- ment and feasibility of the proposed improvements. G. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA • PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPJtovEMENT To Thu Eden Prairie City Council; The undersigned property owners herein petition the Eden Prairie City Council to consider making the followiny described improvements(s): (General Location) X( Sanitary Sewer ':( Watennain • • X Storm Sewer • X Street Paving Other Construction of Bennett Place from • Blossom Road to Highway #1. Street Address or Other Loyal Description or Names of Petitioners Property to be Served Mt;t Be Propert. Own. s) • ?No . fr' ' r � c -L. _NA .i 7 -r, • • • • • • (For City Use) / Date Received gxGB0 Project No. I.0.e.5_37c / • Council Consideration (D/7[6-0 -. Creekview Estates CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE RAP HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • ( Ordinance No. 79-39 . AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING I ORDINANCE NO. 135 THE CITY COUNCIL.OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended as follows: The following described property, as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof, . • shall be and hereby is removed from the R1-22 District and shall be included hereinafter in the R1-13.5 District. Section 2. The above-described property shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of - , 1980, between James William and Carol Jean Burnett, husband and wife, Raymond Lawrence and Dorothy Lee Kussmaul, husband and wife, and Lawrence E. and Nancy Ann Heinen, husband and wife ..nd the City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement is hereby made a part hereof and shall further be subject to all of the ordinances, rules and regulations' of the City of Eden Prairie relating to the R1-13.5 District. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City dayof January , 1980, and of Eden Prairie on the 22nd finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting • of , 1980. of the City Council of said City on' the • day Wolfgang H. Penzel - Mayor • l ATTEST: Join D. Franc - City Clerk dayof 1984. PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the —_� t , CREEKVIEW ESTATES LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 5 and 6, except that part described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 5; thence southerly along the easterly line of said Lot 5, a distance of 82.00 feet; thence at right angles west 669.39 feet; thence deflect to the right 98 degrees 03 minutes to the _ . north line of said Lot 5; thence easterly along the north line of said • Lot 5 to the northeast corner of said Lot 5; thence southerly along the east line of said Lot 5 to the point of beginning. Lots 7,8, and 9 except that part of said Lots 8 and 9 described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of the north half of said Lot 9; thence west along the south.line of said north half of Lot 9, a distance of 399.64 feet; thence north parallel with the east lines with said south line of the north half of Lot 9 to the east line of said Lot 8 ; thence southerly along the east lines of said Lots 8 and 9 to the point of beginning. Lot 10, except the south 50.00 feet of the west 350.00 feet of said Lot 10. The north 50.00 feet of the east 350.00 feet of Lot 11. • All in Eden Prairie Acres according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the County Recorder. EXHIBIT A • Od./u • 5?1 I �; �s .Jo sa-s�V -PPr ist r leG4NCd/ .`" y s 1 a / Ci �r��C 4 .. a p i" '�' Q�i t /� ' I t�a 1 0. , ]t� 1,- - al, (y vd 0w I1�0✓ ti''^ /1" le a- 0I"/i] " C<r✓ C I.dt Lac/�3 r.a .?3-77 • i99 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • HENNEPIN COUNTY, 'IINNESOTA Ordinance No. 080-20 • ORDINANCE CHANGING STREET NAMES IN THE PLATS OF BLUFFS WEST AND BLUFFS WEST SECOND ADDITIONS The City Council of the City of Eden Prairie does ordain as follows: The street name Bluffs Boulevard, within the plat of Bluffs West herein changed as further described: Cul-de-sac streets abutted by the following described lots are herein changed as follows: Lot 1, Block 1 to Lot 5, Block 1 inclusive to Bristol Court. Lot 11, Block 5 to Lot 16, Block 5 inclusive, to Brittany Way. Lot 17, Block 5 to Lot 20, Block 5 inclusive, and Lot 1, Block 6 to Lot 4, Block 6 inclusive, to Edinburgh Circle. Lot 1, Block 9 to Lot 9, Block 9 inclusive, to Colony Court. ( Lot 10, Block 9 to Lot 14, Block 9 inclusive, to Newport Drive. Lot 1, Block 10 to Lot 5, Block 10 inclusive and Lot 3, Block 11 to Lot 5, Block 11 inclusive, to Wimbleton Court. Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 11 and Lot 3 and Lot 4, Block 13 to Devonshire Place. Lot 7, Block 12 to Lot 9, Block 12 inclusive, and Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 13 to Devonshire Place. Lot 7, Block 12 to Lot 9, Block 12 inclusive, and Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 13 to Salem Court. Lot 20, Block 15 to Lot 26, Block 15 inclusive, to Brown Farm Circle. Bluffs Boulevard, exclusive of the previously described cul-de-sacs, is herein changed to Homeward Hills Road. The street name Idlewild Drive, within the plat pf Bluffs West is herein changed to The street name Homeward Hills Road, within the plat of Bluffs West Second Addition, is herein changed to Silverwood Drive. First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 16th day of September, I930, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of_ , 1980. 29'7 fit' • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ( ENGINEERING REPDRT ON FINAL PLAT • TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager .FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: October 2, 1980 • SUBJECT: TOPVIEW ACRES 4TH ADDITION PROPOSAL: The Developer, Jerrold Miller, is requesting City Council approval . of the final plat of Topview Acres 4th Addition. This is a single family residential plat consisting of 8 residential lots and 1 Outlot (to be replatted in Phase 2,) located west of Gerard Drive and north of Valley View Road in the north 2 of Section 10. • HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on June 5, 1979, per Resolution #70-108. Zoning to R1-13.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on August 7, 1979, through Drdinance #79-18. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed on August 2, 1979. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. A variance from the requirements of Ordinance #93, Sec. 8, Subd. 1, waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be necessary. UTILITIES AND STREETS: The requirements for the installation of utilities and streets are covered in the Devleoper's Agreement. Drainage and utility easements shall be indicated along the lot lines of Dutlot A. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the • the Developer's Agreement. BONDING: The requirements for bonding are covered in the Developer's Agree- ment. RECOMMENDATIDN: Recommend approval of the final plat of Topview Acres 4th Addition, subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: ( 1. Receipt of cash deposit for street lighting in the amount of $393.60. 2. Receipt of fee for City Engineering in the amount of $240.00. 219 • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE , HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA . RESOLUTION NO.R80-197 . •• A RESOLUTION APPROVING-FINAL PLAT • OF TOPVIEW ACRES 4TH AOOITION • WHEREAS, the plat of Topview Acres 4th Addition has been sub- . mitted in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordin- ances of the City of Eden Prairie. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: - A. Plat Approval Request for Topview Acres 4th Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's Report on this plat dated October 2, 1980. B. Variance is herein granted from City Ordinance No. 93, Sec. 8, Subd. 1 waiving the six month Maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said Engineer's Report. 41. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Regis- trar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3. D. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy • of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named • plat. E. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon com- pliance with the foregoing provisions. AOOPTED by the City Council on .. . • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Franc, C1 erd— Oct. 7, 1980. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. R8O-200 RESOLUTION RECEIVING 100% PETITION AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS IN THE GOLDEN STRIP ADDITION (I.C. 51-396) • BE.IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: • 1. The owners of 100% of the real property abutting upon and to be benefitted from the proposed sewer, water and street improvements in the Golden Strip Addition, I.C. 51-396, at an estimated total cost of $600,000, have petitioned the City Council to construct said improvements and to assess the entire cost against their property. 2. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, and upon recommendation of the City Engineer, said improvements are hereby ordered and the City Engineer, with the assistance of Bather, Ringrose,. Woldsfeld, Inc., shall prepare plans and specifications for said improvements in accordance with City standards and adver- tise for bids thereon. II - 3. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the City Clerk is hereby directed to publish a copy of this resolution once in the of- ficial newspaper, and further a contract for construction of said improvements shall not be approved by the City Council prior to 30 days following publication of this resolution in the City's official newspaper. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. frane, Clerk • • CONDON-NAEGELE REALTY COMPANY 7751 Flying Cloud Drive • • Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 •September 26,. 1980 . ' The Eden Prairie City Council ' Eden Prairie, MN Condon-Naegele Realty is submitting a petition for the improvements required to complete development of streets and utilities in the Golden Strip plat per plans completed and received by the City some two years ago. There appears to be no need for the project until the status of the Schooner Boulevard bridge and access ramps to 1494 has been established and the construction work scheduled. However, we wish to have our petition before the City so that it may be considered as soon as a firm project date has been set for the Schooner Boulevard interchange. .` - Sincerely, . CONDON-NAEGELE REALTY fr By: ram /.7 ''.-.'-/ 4-// /4>Z Richard F. Condon - Managing Partner /rh • r 2Il -_.._ S` • MA PETITION rum IAAJtJ. u.,,.u.:_...,.... - • TO THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: ,j ` a+ The undersigned are all the fee owners of the real property described below and herein petition for the Eden Prairie City Council to proceed with making the following described improvements: • (General Location) X Sanitary Sewer All in Golden Strip Drive from U.S. X Watermain '169/212 to end of ''street; 'and the X Storm Sewer southbound two-lane section of Schooner . • X street Paving Boulevard from Co. Rd. 39 to inter- • • X other (Lighting, section with Golden Strip Drive. Signage) Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the undersigned hereby waive any public hearing to be held on said improvements, and further state and agree that the total cost of said improvements shall be specially as- sessed against the property described below in accordance with the City's special assessment policies. We fuether understand that the preliminary, estimated total cost for the said improvements is1600,000 . Street Address or other Legal Names and addresses of Petitioners Descri lion of Property to be served (Must be owners of record) ( Outlots A B, and�_and Condon-Naggple Realty • lots ll 2, and 3LB7_ock 1, 7751 Flying Cloud Drive Golden Strip_ Eden i�rairie, MN 55344. Ricfard F. Condon Managing Partner —___ (For City �{use) ?LLDate Received�I lL Project No. S. C. S)- 39(o Council Consideration CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 4 CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST October 7, 1980 CONTRACTOR (Multi-Family & Comm_) HEATING & VENTILATING Balco Building Systems, Inc. Burkes Heating CO. Inc. Robert Compton, Inc. Cook Heating Co. Shaw Lundquist Associates, Inc. SCAVENGER Shelard Companies, Inc. Sunway Homes, Inc. Welsh Construction Corporation Sullivan's Services Inc. CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 Family} SOLICITORS S. Anderson Co. Eva Engler Deckworks Denco Home Builders CANDY RETAIL Landico, Inc. Narr Construction, Inc. Preserve Rexall Drug Natures Way, Inc. Peturska Construction, Inc. VENDING MACHINE Star Garage ----`—`— T R E Construction Preserve Rexall Drug Katherine Taylor's Very Distictive Homes, Inc. 1 Teri Homes, Inc. CIGARETTE & TOBACCO PLUMBERS Preserve Rexall Drug Action Plumbing Northland Mechanical Contractors, Inc. Wm. F. Ridler Plumbing & Heating SEWER/WATER Axel Newman Heating & Plumbing Co. ON-SITE SEWAGE SYSTEM Hopkins Plumbing & Heating These licenses have been approved by the department head responsible for the licensed activity. ( Cindy Plante, Licensing Clerk . j q CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • ( j+1 RESOLUTION NO. R80-194 1 IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, the following persons have agreed to serve as election judges and are appointed for the Primary Election, November 4, 1980. *Indicates Precinct Chairperson. PRECINCT I KING OF GLORY LUTHERAN CHURCH • *Loretta Ellison 16920 S. Shore Lane 934-3060 Bernadette Ploumen 17040 S. Shore Lane 934-2391 Cheryl Glisczinski 7152 Ticonderoga Trail 934-2195 Rosemary Dysinge_r 15613 N. Lund Road 934-9076 Lorraine Raths 16960 S. Shore Lane 934-2224 Delores Klein 15701 N. Lund Drive 934-9124 Joanne Ronski 6630 Tartan Curve 934-4226 Roberta Bronson 6236 Eden Prairie Road 934-9070 PRECINCT II IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH . *Sue Lane 6961 Alpine Trail 937-1669 Mary Upton 16163 Edenwood Drive 937-2938 Gretta Zumburge 16060 Alpine Way 937-2946 Ann Gay Parker 16191 S. Hillcrest Court 937-8888 Vi Johnson 16176 Edenwood Drive 937-2848 C Barb Johnson 7660 Atherton Way 937-8994 Aurelia Rasinski 76R2 Superior Terrace 937-8679 Jan Strand 6755 Woodhill Trail 937-1188 PRECINCT III FOREST HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL *Doris Johnson 14315 Crown Drive 937-2287 Maigarct Bye 6530 Leesborough Avenue 937-1277 Joanne Carlin 6890 Canterbury Lane 937-8828 Ruth Mital 12762 Gordon Drive 944-3481 Jan Anderson 6591 Manchester Lane 937-1271 Barbara Walker 6640 Manchester Lane 937-2171 Priscilla Bailey 6950 Marianne Drive 937-8885 Cheryl Bridge 7272 Gerard Drive 941-8104 . PRECINCT IV EDEN PRAIRIE METHODIST CHURCH *Jinny Gibson 15737 Cedar Ridge Road 937-]374 Betty Fritz 8226 Tamarack Trail 937-2480 Virginia Gartner 15701 Cedar Ridge Road 937-1595 Margie Woodhouse 9520 Lakeland Circle 934-1424 Evelyn Rogers 9100 Eden Prairie Road 937-2992 Shirley Jellison 9560 Highview Drive 934-0934 Sharon Levitt 8406 Hiawatha Avenue 937-2872 ( Howard Merriman 9501 Highview Drive 934-0941 • Resolution No. R80-194 • Page two PRECINCT V EDEN PRAIRIE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH *Sharon Lynch 11426 Leona Road 941-2792 Mildred Clark 8779 Basswood Road 941-3269 Barbara Vanderploeg 8735 Leeward Circle 941-5369 • Ruth Charchain 10960 Northmark Drive 941-5005 Margaret Kruger 14311 Fairway Drive 937-8261 Grace Carmody 8595 Mitchell Road 937-2651 Adeline Bramwell 14329 Fairway Drive 937-8987 Sue Marth 8719 Bentwood Drive 944-3140 PRECINCT VI SOUTH SUBURBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY VO-TECH *Edna Walker 8952C Neill Lake Road 941-6479 Joy Brekke 10091 Homeward Hills 941-4547 Marion Nesbitt 8701 Black Maple Drive 941-2387 Gloria Pond 8819 Darnel Road 941-5148 Jeanne Brandt 12300 Riverview Road 941-3316 Elenor LaVine 9712 Mill Creek Drive 944-7636 Barbara Higgins 11260 Windrow Drive 941-5273 ( Anne Janus 9600 Friar Drive 941-1406 COUNTING CENTER EDEN PRAIRIE CITY HALL Perry Forester 9505 Highview Drive 934-0938 . Kent Barker 15801 Cedar Ridge Road 937-1454 Leo Rasinski 7682 Superior Terrace 937-8699 7 �c,rn orD+f ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council this th day of-Novemher4- 1980. • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Franc, City Clerk a23Zi B-T LAND COMPANY 1055 EAST WAYZATA BOULEVARD WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 16121 473-8511 October 2, 1980 Mayor and City Council Members City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55343 RE: Timber Creek Concept Proposal Dear Mayor and Council Members: Since the September 2, 1980 Council meeting we have continued our discussions with the City staff attempting to resolve the park issues and the City's requirement for additional park land from our proposed concept plan. The City staff has suggested an alternative to our concept which may be acceptable to us. The attached drawing is a "broad-brush" map of what the City staff has suggested. This concept is based upon donation of approximately 42% of the site for park and open space (green area) and payment of approximately $83,000.00 in park dedication fees at the time building permits are issued in accordance with the City's Park Dedication Ordinance. This approach would save the ( City both time and funds in that it would eliminate any potential condemnation proceedings while still acquiring the desired lands for public use. The City will be granting a density transfer to allow 100 row townhouse units and 10 single-family units on the northern parcel. This would allow a density of 1.89 units per acre for the overall site. In order for B-T Land Company to donate roughly 42% of its site to the public, as well as pay the full park dedication fees as mentioned above, we would require the following understandings along with this concept approval: 1. The park fees mentioned above shall be set at the time that B-T Land Company presents the City of Eden Prairie with a deed for the area shaded in green. This would be at the time of final platting for our first phase. 2. B-T Land Company shall be treated in the same manner as all other property owners with respect to improvements on Townline Road. • rr c)66 City of Eden Prairie -2- October 2, 1980 3. Should B-T Land Company be requested to install the public trails and bike paths along County Road 4 and Duck Lake Trail, then the cost of these improvements will be reimbursed to B-T Land Company from the park fees mentioned above ($83,000.00) as those monies are paid into the City Park fund when building permits are issued. We are hopeful that this concept can be approved on Tuesday evening enabling us to proceed with our engineering analysis and preliminary platting on a timely basis. Please feel free to contact me at any time should you have any questions concerning this concept proposal. Sincerely, B-T LAND N Rick D. Murray Vice President RDM/lg enclosure cc: Bruce D. Malkerson Jack Lynch Roger Ulstad 26Y1 OCT 21980 State of Minnesota, ss COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, I, VERNON T. HOPPE,Auditor of the above County,do hereby certify that I have compared the papers writing,to which this certificate is attached,with the original Resolution No. 80-9-804C adopted by the Board of Cortnissioners on September 23, 1980 as the same appears of record and on file in the said County Auditor's office,at the Court House in said. Hennepin County,Minnesota,and find the same to be true and correct copy thereof. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County,at the City of Minneapolis,this 1st day of ,Octcr A.D. 19 80 VERNai T. HOPPE 0 County Auditor by: �.��tL�r- • U(�1.1. Deputy 5 I RESOLUTION NO. 80-9-804c The following resolution was offered by Cainissioner Spartz, seconded by Comnissioner Johnson: WHEREAS, Hennepin County has no legal authority to prohibit Eden Prairie from proceeding with the proposed tax increment district, and if • Eden Prairie proceeds with the tax increment district despite the urging of Hennepin County, it is in the best interests of all Hennepin County taxpayers that no adjustment be made to the original assessed value base for improvements for permits issued in the eighteen month period prior to municipal approval of the plan; BE IT RESOLVED, that the Director of Property Taxation is directed to exclude from the original assessed value of the proposed tax increment district all assessed value of improvements for which building permits have been issued Iduring the eighteen month period immediately preceding approval of the plan by the City of Eden Prairie, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this action of the County Board is taken subject to acceptance of the following conditions by the City Council of Eden Prairie: 1. Improvements to be financed by tax increment shall be limited in scope and number to the projects identifiedsin the tax increment financing plan submitted to the Board for comments. 9 • 2. All of the captured assessed value shall be retained by the tax increment district in order that the tax increment district can be terminated in the shortest possible time after sufficient tax increment has been received to pay debt and expenditures incurred. 3. No County funds shall be approved for any of the projects included j in the tax increment plan. BE Pf IZIRT1IEI RESOLVE]), tint the iennepin County Board of Co:maissioneis strongly urges the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie to reject the tax increment district as presently proposed for the following reasons: 1. The react and bridge projects should be financed through traditional highway funding mechanisms, not though the use of tax increment financing; 2. The district is far too large and composed of primarily vacant land which is not blighted or otherwise in need of redevelopment assistance by government; 3. The district. is scheduled to continue too long and capture • far too much valuation, thereby depriving Hennepin County . of tax base and automatically resulting in artificially iJncrcascd County mill rates to finance needed County services; 4. Approva3. of such a tax incremmt district. for road projects will create a precedent for similar projects throughout Hentie'in County and thereby further reduce the County tax Lose unnecessarily; and :�369 SEP 2:3198O • RESJWTIti 30-9-804c (continued) ^ BE IT FURTHER RL:;OLVID, that Hennepin County staff is directed to prepare [ legislation to eliminate such loopholes from the state tax increment law; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie to be entered into the record of the public hearing on the tax increment financing plan. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were sevenYEAS and no NAYS as follows: COUNTY OF h1 NN1 SIN BOARD OF COUNTY CotII.ISSIONERS YEi. NAY OTHER Jeff Spartz X Randall E. Johnson X Richard E. Kremer X John E. Denis X E. F. Robb, Jr., X Sam S. Sivanich . X Nancy Olkon, Chair X• R1SOIUT'IcN AIX)iTID. ATTEST:. (L.)e c 9J Deputy (Aunty` tor pIp SEP 23 1980 239U • Ct/. /16 �oli3a ^1 _ 10 • ( • office of the superintendent 14. September 23, 1980 t0 N aMayor Wolfgang Penzel City of Eden Prairie 7236 Ticonderoga Trail Eden Prairie, MN 55344 0 Dear Mayor Penzel: c At the September 18, 1980 meeting of the Eden Prairie School Board, a resolution was passed in support of the City of Eden Prairie's Tax Increment Financing Plan. This resolution reads as follows: d "Resolve to support the Tax Increment Financing Plan m proposed by the Eden Prairie City Council for the • purpose of constructing access roads to and around the Eden Prairie Center and to furthermore support the Tax 2 Increment Financing District as recommended by the Eden $ Prairie City Council." .c H The cooperation which exists between the city officials and the school board has been a benefit to the citizens of Eden Prairie. o We appreciate the manner in which you kept us informed on this issue and we look forward to continued mutual support. Sincerely, G. L. McCoy ) Superintendent GLM/ip 239 Oat. 7, 1980, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. R80. 195 RESOLUTION APPROVING 1980 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR DUCK LAKE VISTA WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections in the proposed assessments for the following improvements, to wit: (See Exhibit A attached) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such proposed assessments are hereby accepted and shall con- stitute the special assessment against the lands in the final assessment rolls, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the improve- ments in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual install- ments extending over a period of years as shown on Exhibit A, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1980. Subsequent installments shall bear interest at the rate of 8.5 percent per annum. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid on or before November.15, 1980. • 3. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John 0. Frane, Clerk • 239.E • EXHIBIT A Resolution No. R80-195 I.C. 51-367 - DUCK LAKE VISTA • Total project cost $124,715 City Share 9,850 Assessable Cost $114,865 • $114,865 31 lots = $3,795.32/lot 5 years @ 8.5% e 7e2 i4 October 7., 198D CITY DF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESDTA RESOLUTION NO. R80-196 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS (I.C. 5I-385) WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 16th day of September, 1980, fixed the 7th day of October, 1980, as the date for a public hearing on the following proposed improvements: I.C. 51-385, Drainage outlet for Lake Idlewild WHEREAS, all property owners whose property is liable to be assessed for the making of this improvement were given ten days published notice of the Council hearing through two weekly publications of the re- quired notice and the hearing was held and property owners heard on the 7th day of October, 1980. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such improvement as above indicated is hereby ordered (and amended as follows.) 2. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for this project and is hereby directed to prepare plans and speci- fications for the making of such improvement, with the assist- _ ance of Rieke Carroll Muller Assoc., Consulting Engineers. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Franc, Clerk r . / E �39� i l SUITE 1141-ONE'APh1 I THEE EOUANE BLOOMINGTON,MN!5:,420 TELEPHONE.012/0S4-G400 • Land'Ske R. COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL/REAL ESTATE AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT • August 8, 1980 Mr. Chris Enger City Planner Eden Prairie City Hall 8950 Eden Prarie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 Dear Mr. Enger: Attached please find additional materials and revisions relating to our submission for P.U.D. and zoning appro- val at Lake Idlewild. We have decided to pursue devel- opment stage approval for Phase I on the southeast side of Lake Idlewild. As you know, we are proceeding with the P.U.D. and zoning approval process prior to the resolution of the storm sewer outlet-drainage problem at Lake Idle- wild. Resolution of the problem will establish the lake level at it's natural high water mark. Because of the extremely high elevation of the lake presently, the completion of an outlet will cause a significant lowering of the lake level. The extent of this lower- ing will directly affect the amount of buildable land on the site. The proposed site plan, as submitted, does anticipate some shoreline recovery; however, we are not certain of the extent of the change. The resulting addi- tion may also alter our needs in terms of setback and parking variances. The intent of this letter is to make you aware that some of the variances we are requesting may not be ultimately required, but are essential at this time. In addition, we generally wish to qualify our submission by informing you that a change in lake level could require other revisions which are not anticipated at this time. 23�t� ( Mr. Chris Enger • Page 2 We wish to thank you and the City for your coorperation and assistance in our preparation of the submission. We look forward to a successful project in Eden Prairie. Sin erely: i • homas W. Heib r President TWH/kmb • C • • • • • 1 _ • e ( a31 I l= u _ • of •--. R L.• lL lL le- L. L.le-W ' +' a N • X •7C • II CO • C 0 a)V) V)N N V) 'V) V) V)V)V) CO v L L w U V 1.(V S. E OE O J-iO 00 •): •• C 0 • a aCD U rn UIn L. O L04-O to rov ' ea 0r- In a ro CO •.-t.o•,-es.' O+O N. VI0) a) al a - 1 a - - .O -n -In • •• • a C L.4-, a 4- 7 v •toI-.cT n•-•l CO OVNOI. L aC w 0• r-0 •O •O) ••e2) ea•-to•-I.t u Y ro L a+ N zm V VN SO N •o L.. r- I- a )n 0•N e C (7) O), x) II •o .0 CA OI C m O C C • N ' O. C E^ N • VI II • CO 0 4- •• 7 a) O) v li Z 4-, C C 0) 4-0 • .a r • 0••-_C VI •-Z O a) 0) C •4- r 4-' r L.4-' O 'C= E al a) •r 4-, 0) •r 4-,4-0O. �)w a) 7 L L N 4-I.n C L^ a .0C L. IA w Y VI U U C CO •0 tL L. 0 7 IC, 0)a)'- Ai N N N ro Ln I') •0 ro • a) O. 0) r Q Cr) V a L V) - O. Cr) w 0)4-, a. • O 0) .a 3 3 ••>< Y 7 t to L (1) a •- C a ... U CO a+•-I ro a+ L. U w N • • 3 as O) aro•r 17 a) L. Y +' 4-' • 13 L Y •• •0 C +' II o 7 Y Q U 4- 4- • ac 4-' 4-' 0 7 I. • C 4-' O).0 ▪ RI ro II II 4-' 4- w 4- C.V a a C I- I.) _J •0 17 O O 4- In U r- VI•r O. • • •0 C C 4-,r• •N •O a) 0 S.. a -1C W U. r I ro a) •O i-'N 4. a+ 0 O- 0 Lr • • _J VI •4-' 4•'N 4- .0 N 4-' C a I-V)V) 3 •• ro ro 4- 4- 4- In ro ro VI V, 0 O..0 (1) a C a) a) •0 V) •0 N O L aJ r a) C 4-'•r O N +' L. L. N O re)(D•-1 Cr) L. L. L a) C 4-' 0 1-O LC) •0 a Q Q .0 4-' .0 IO 0•-I CV ro ro > +) U O. •r O.a) 0 O CO i. •-•• C) Io N+'CO cc In >) a N •a o L E L 4- 0)CO e21 a) O.7 al ••N•--I a) aJ a▪ ro r 7 N. C al a) .0 a 7 4.) N > al I') 0) Y 4-,4-' 4-, •a e a) O) Y 0 +' a) 0' O N 0 L N a •r 0 0 > (1) • •0 SO a 0 L ' a) O Q U a J V)I-• I- Q K 3 w I- J V) I- Q IY U.-* • O CO o .-I▪ C S N r 0 ' a 4- 4-,CO•r 4-, • -0 L. .0 v o.0 U- lL▪ to. U. ••- v a+ C VI • • L 4-' U a) N N N V) a)V) N V) N V) X+'•r N a) a) a) L. a) a) w•r O.(1) i' L. LID U V L.N L N E I. U U U SO ro CO U I•) U In (1)13 L. O. a ro ro N In 10 N. Ia CO w 7 o a) a ••V) V,4-L. In N.Ire I')rn •IO 1.....iC I,.--I N O) N.O.-v .-0) •(D •01 C • •r) • rV V N ION 0 N C•) r II O) O Y 4-'Y 4-'4-'4-' 0) • 4-4-4-4-4- ro U- 4-) a) E • L • 'o Y 7 Un In O(D O a) V) L. co I')I')LEI r9 N 0)> N co C O O a CO i- Q •r U t0 a) CO • • C O Y Y In S..w w a .a u L 4-, ro 'CIa E w VI a L ' C l+) koti N a) -VS.. N • Y .0 o O •,... II V -Vwr S- 0 Y Q Y 4-, U 4-' 4- L.. 0 II l Z a U al ro a) •0 O.N X c <IL 7 U J •0 a al .0 N a) C 4Y a) ws u- C C .0 L ++ ro0 LN Li- Ill �u w I ro ++4-' U . I a 0 u a o ,U LY J al V) N N 0)4- a L. 4-4 V) • -)L •• ro ro ut •--I a C U a a) a) aJ .0'0 N '0 IL a1 N. a a+t0 N Cin IN a 2 4-' 4Y 1. L r- •0.V ro L. L. ro•0.-N. C tO In my •r a^ Q .0 0)CO OC > ^ >r,p •m •.-N rad -7'- C C) ro 3-C�d' C T ro•r ro c'f • I. ❑a 7 of7� • O.0) Zw F., 0) re) a 7 4-, C 0) 0) a .000•r- Xr- YV \J•� U. -.O E 4-,4-' 4-' or- . In (1) �['O 4-, aJ a O CV •- o 0 > a) CI•O IO•a 0 L. > 0 E. O VI I- I- ¢ W 3 w�J ut )- ¢ CCLL r: ..J a e y,a a U . 3(( SUTE 1141-ONE APPLETREE SQUARE 6LOOMINGTON.MN 55420 TELEPHONE:612/854.6400 Land'Sake COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL/REAL ESTATE • AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT Calulation of Lake Edlewild Set 'Back Area: • 1. City Requirements - Setbacks West 78th St. 3:) ft. X 860 ft. 30,100 S.F. Eden Road 35 ft. X 510 ft. 17,850 S.F. 169 & 212 50 ft. X 645 ft. 32,250 S.F. Lake 30 ft. x 1,335 ft. 40,050 S.F. - Side Yard 20 ft. x 385 ft. 7,700 S.F. Total 127,950 S.F. Setback requirements 2.93 acres 6.70:acres less 2.93 acres 3.77 acres available for parking and building Footprint coverage maximum 3.77 x 30% = 1.13 acres x 43,560 S.F./acre = 49,266 S.F. Footprint to land area ratio 49,266 S.F. = 16.88% 291,852 S.F. 3.77 acres less footprint of 1.13 = 2.64 acres available for parkin 328 parking stalls x 200 s.f. of building/parking area 65,713 S.F. of building • All open space is allocated in setback areas 2. P.U.D. request setbacks West 78th Street 10 ft. with screening & birms X 860 ft. 8,600 S.F. Eden Road 20 ft. with screening & birms X 510 ft. = 10,200 S.F. 169 & 212 Y0 ft. with plantings X 645 ft.= 12,900 S.F. Lake 30 ft X 1,335 ft. = 40,050 S.F. Side yards 20 ft. X 385 ft. _ • 7,700 S.F. Total 79,450 S.F. • P.U.0. Request Setbacks - Cont. Setback area requested 1.82 acres l 6.70 acres 1 less 1.82 acres • 4.88 acres Request is to put the addition area (1.11acres or 47,916 S.F.) if request is granted into open space Footprint to land area ratio requested Atrium 1st foor area and covered parking area on 1st floot are approximately same square footage 32 000 S.F. = 10.96% 29 52 S.F. 2391� approved Planning Commission Minutes -3- August 25, 1980 Bearman arrived at 7:48 PM. B... LAKE IDLEWILD OFFICE DEVELOPMENT, by Land' Sake, Inc. Request for •l'UD Concept, preliminary plat, and rezoning from Rural to Office • for development of "townoffices". Located in the SW quadrant of U.S. 169/212 and West 78th Street. The Planner reviewed the 8/22/80 staff memo and introduced Tom Heiberg, President of Land' Sake, Inc. Heiberg reviewed the location and 5 basic requests: 1. Storm sewer petition, 2. Setback variance request, 3. approval of PUO of 6.7 acres, 4, rezoning to office, 5. preliminary plat approval. He also reviewed the ownership, concept plan, and phasing plan. The Planner reviewed the staff recomnendations and pointed out that more open space would be preserved near the lake with the setback variances. Bearman asked if a feasibility study will be done of the Lake Idlewild outlet pro- blem. The Planner stated that it is currently under way. • • Levitt asked if there could he any development prior to resolution of the storm _ sewer issue. The Planner replied no. • Levitt asked how Lake Idlewild is classified by the D.N.R. The Planner stated that it is General Development. Levitt stated that the Shoreland Management Act should be taken into account. The. Planner stated that it would leave the land undevelopable. Bearman asked if anything has been done to the lake to facilitate its use as a storm holding pond. Paul Anderson stated that it had been dredged to give it more cap- • acity. • Bentley asked if' the lake is public water or private and if it is public, how ownership is shown. The Planner stated that the lot lines extend to the middle of the lake and that the owner owns the basin. Bearman asked how the project would be addressed. Heiberg replied that they are not sure but that they have thought of giving each building an internal site number to be identified by and that the overall project could have one street address. Retterath asked how far their northeast access is from the fire station. Anderson • replied 150 ft. The Planner then stated that that is far enough away. Torjesen asked if any adjoining property owners were present because he felt that the commission would like to hear their vicros on the project. approved Planning Commission Minutes -4- August 25, 1980 Claire Kooiman,7639 Eden Road stated that she was in favor of the Lake being lowered because their tennis court is now under water. She felt that the area was going to develop and offices seemed like an appropriate use. Gartner asked if the resolution of storm sewer also includes the lake level. The Planner replied yes. Motion 1 Gartner moved to close the public hearing. Sutliff seconded, motion carried 7-0. Motion 2 Gartner moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the PUD Concept dated 7/25/80 as per the 8/22/80 staff report. Bentley seconded, motion carried 5-2. Bearman and Levitt voted nay. Motion 3 Gartner moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the first phase rezoning to office as per the 8/22/80 staff report with the following additions: ' 1. Grading will be limited to Phase I. 2. That an erosion control plan be added. • Bentley seconded, motion carried 5-2. Bearman and Levitt voted nay. Motion 4 Gartner moved to reconmend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat for Phase I dated 7/25/80 as per the 8/22/80 staff report. Bentley seconded, motion carried 5-2. Beaman and Levitt voted nay. o2t10 • • • • • MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning • • PROJECT: LAKE IDLLWILD OFFICE-TOWNHOUSES APPLICANT: Land' Sake, Inc. • FEE OWNER: Calvin Anderson Family • REQUEST: P.U.D. Concept approval and Preliminary Platting of a 6.73 acre Office Park and Rezoning of 2.65 acres (Phase I) from Rural to Office District LOCATION: In the southwest quadrant of U.S. 169/212 and West 78th Street BACKGROUND AVtlinugh the total area of this site is only 11.4 acres, including the lake, it • is within the Major Center Area P.U.D. Since the M.C.A., P.U.D. was adopted as an official planning document in 1973, prior to enactment of the State Shoreland Management Act, development of this area should be reviewed within the context of the M.C.A. plan, not the Shoreland Management Act. Lake Idlewild, itself, is about 13 acres in size and has had substantial urban in- fluence on it in the form of highway construction on the north and east and develop- ment on the west and south. The outflow of Lake Idlewild is to the north, and would flow over West 78th Street if another outlet is not provided. The City is currently involved in the feasibility of this storm sewer project, and the ultimate solution would have to be identified before Phase I of this develop- ment could proceed. The M.C.A. plan and the 1979 Guide Plan would allow office as an appropriate land use for this area. The site itself is very severely constrained by its long, thin, irregular shape, and having roads on three sides and a lake to the back. The concept, then, quite naturally evolved to cluster buildings throughout the • site in order to provide parking in close proximity. The majority of the open space is then utilized toward the lake, while the parking faces the roads. For this reason, setback waivers are being requested along U.S. 169/212 (from 35' to 20') and along West 78th Street (from 17'.,' to 10') for the parking. • Information regarding ground coverage supplied by Land' Sake indicates two things: 1. Both floor area ratio and ground coverage are less than half that which our ordinance mould allow. 2. If ordinance setbacks were adhered to, ground coverage could be the same but • open space would be displaced from the lake side to the road side. 2g01 Memo--Lake Idlewild -2- August 22, 1980 The critical factor in this case, is whether the setback proposal is great enough to provide adequate screening of the parking. Site sections have been provided that illustrate screening is possible through extensive use of retaining walls. • Pedestrian System Although some sidewalks are shown as a part of the building floor plans and a trail system is shown ringing the lake, the two need to be tied more closely together so that there is a clear way to get from parking areas to the building entrances. Auto Circulation The prvonen t should work with the property owner to the south to assure that the eastern entrance lines up. Since this project is ringed by public roads, and no additional external traffic • will he using the parking lot system, the proponents provision of a 30' wide driving lane rather than a normal 25' wide lane, will be sufficient to handle • internal circulation. There is additional developable land on the north side of the lake lying west of this project. Provision should be made for either joint access to 78th Street with this parcel or an access easement to it. Parking f There will be three stalls per building covered parking. The balance of the parking will be provided according to ordinance. Mechanical Fquinment Since the buildings will he low in relationship to U.S. 169/212, mechanical equip- ment will be handled within the buildings rather than on the roof. Atriums The buildings will be clustered in three groups and two free-standing buildings. In the building clusters, the structures have been connected with a common atrium which will function as a main entryway and climate controlled tie between structures. This will allow eleven of the thirteen buildings to function like four larger buildings Mile providing the benefits of individual ownership. Because of this clustering, the distance between structures can be increased. Materials • Tlie buildings will he of steel and masonry construction with heavy reliance on wood accents. Approximately 5E of the exterior of the buildings will be wood. Because of the way in which fill was placed on the site, the buildings may have to be built upon pilings. Prelinrin,rry Plat. 1 llic lots are to be divided as shown on the preliminary plat, the site plan must take into account the following items: 1. No parking is allowed within 10 feet of any lot line. This would require 20' islands in those areas where lot lines cut through parking areas. 2. Minimum side yard setback of 20' one side 50' combined would require the area north of the lake to be slightly mortified.20.2 Memo--Lake Idlcwild -3- August 22, 1980 Because of the potential for future changes in ownership through the life of the project, and the fact that the proponent can meet these setbacks with slight revisions, the Planning Staff would recommend revision of the plan. RECO MEllD\TI O 1S The Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Co,nnission recommend approval of the P.U.D. Concept for 6.7 acres of office subject to the following: 1. Resolution of the storm sewer problem. 2. Approval of the front yard setback waivers, subject to proper screening oi• the parking. 3. Resolution of access to the west and access to the south. 4. Approval of wood as an external material. Recommend approval of the request for rezoning from Rural to Office District for Phase I subject to the following: 1. Compliance with overall P.U.D. recommendations. 2. Detailed storm sewer plans to be reviewed and approved by Purgatory Creek Watershed District. • 3. Compliance with Signage and Landscaping Ordinance. Recommend approval of the request for Preliminary Plat subject to the following: 1. Phase I only to be platted at this time. 2. Cash Park fee of $1400/acre. 3. Site plan to be revised to conform with side yard setbacks and 10' minimum distance parking to any lot line. CE:ss • 2403 , To: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services ' DATE: October 1, 1980 SUBJECT: Development Proposal Check List • PROJECT: Lake Idlewild Office - Townhouses • PROPONENT: Land' Sake, Inc. (fee owner Calvin Anderson Family) REQUEST: I'UD Concept approval and preliminary. plat of 6.73 acre office park and rezoning of L.6S acres from—Rural to Office District. Loualos: Southwest quadrant of US 169/212 and West 78th Street 'BACKGROUND: See Planning Staff Report Dated: ' PARK AND RECREATION PLANNING CONCERNS 1. Type of development: Office ' 2. Number of units in residential development: N/A 3. Number of acres in the project: 6'73 4. Special recreation ..,•-__ .cqu re-rots: N/A S. Adjacent to any existing or proposed parks: no a. Affect on the park: N/A i 6. Need for a mini park: n0 • 7. Cash park fee or land dedication? Cash Park Fee a. If Cash park fee dedication, amount based on existing ordinance will total: $9,4 22 b. If park land dedication, the nuiaber of acres to be dedicated is N/A _ c. Existing or pending assessments or taxes on proposed park property total N/A and wili be paid prior to dedication. 8. Adjacent to existing or proposed trails: Interior trail system type of trails • a. Type of trails b. Construction Material Developer's choice — Developer's choice . c. Width of trail__ d. Party responsible for construction Developer Developer Q.. Landownership of trail location:(dcdic:ted, purchased, ROW) . NATURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION CONCERNS • 1. Site grading plan cnnciders natural amenities of the site? There is no natural amenities to this site, as the majorit•y_of this shereline has Wren grult:tLtud fitt..,1. 2. Most significant cut and fill depths on the site are: The majority of the grading will take_placc on the southeast corner of the lake 1�11cr.C�l?�°t�3L 111 hr rrrolced_from IligWay 169/212 down to the lake. There will be 12' of fill in this location adjacent to the lakeshore. . • 3. Significant vegetation on the site includes:: 111Die is nn significant vegetation on this. site. 4. The site grading plan indicates preservation of: N/A S. Adjacent to public waters: Abuts Lake Idlewild The additional impervious surface will increase runoff into .. Affect on waters: the lake. 1'hls'unott should be Tan�'lTed through a storm sewer with a REFERENCE cHEcK sedimentation sump. • 1. Major Center Arca Study:Attached are copies of pages from the Major Center Study that refer to the Rosemount Pond now knunan as Lake Idlewild. The Major Center Area Study; • does propose CVC1cpment around the shoreline as per this proposal. 2. Neighborhood Facilities Study: N/A 3. Purgatory Creek Study: N/A '. . • 4.. Shorcland Management Ordinance: This use was proposed in the Major Center Study PUD �. that was adopted prior to the Sholsland Management Ordinance ____If_thc_Shumelatirl Management Ordinance were in affect this property would be undevelopable. s apply this 5 a rl must be d 4jappin rrovedabyttheeWatershednDistrict and DNR�11inF' within• the floodplain • 6. Guide plan: The Guide Plan shows this area as regional commercial. • T. Other RECO?41ENflATI W.'S 1. Adjacent neighborhood type, and any neighborhood opinion voiced in favor or opposed to the project: votg__ 2. Planning Commission Recommendation: RCCnmmenSl C[l appYO�'�l 0�3—`i ThP two • • negaiirc mt s...wrresnnc rh t^r• • ' i the Sho. Management Ordinance. • 3. Community Services Staff Recommendations l _COmm>>nity Services staff recommends approval as per the Planning Staff Report dated August 22, 1980, Due to the hieh vises of this site the ConunMnit.y Scrvic ti ff_fes1S1 t ie'iN4 tint tei�, articular_ajt j tion i_g_5itf pat_1+S:recnil,,, of the_» ?n reac 'nd to an adequate landscape plan adjacent to the shureline that will Lend to soften the lack of a building, set hack from thjs 5horeling.,_til-ars1`S.I-1a,n`I nin9,— this development could_122prove the shoreline from its existing condition. • • 24U w as C r.. rn Cy. o v . is is s:. :a ti N N l N i.e• �....�_ N N N co N N N N N N N ` N y.•ii_''f_.� N aNi w a d m m ` ` 9-! F. d P. ` N ` T. In/ 9/ d 1:-..:'-or...-....._. U V U u u u u ...__ V. (CI V V V V t0 t0 (0 a) ca 07 10 T N N N CO CO CO 01 COc0 CON (0 O fi r i,� : 0 a7 CO O) c0 O)d) M O O C c0 I— c0 CO c`1 Of r 0 co m V .— C?c7 co Oj c— cV O) In N• O co c� cD Cj N c`7 V) C'tDOM O CD OOO) an N. V'OO W In � U N QOCO MOmM W O. O V,— m.— M m a.,, —�o3 in g t _ t o o d fiJ1 I ei iG a «. qh Q V) Z V)) co J J Sm a) • U mY° w c dZ O m Ne �C Cd —I J J = T 1 = '-J wEO o $ 0 (� co a ccccmo c es co 0 3 - ee,,� c o d m _ N = c � Ev ` > > oc— Ev om u d viLmmmLLwma Q {nZ Q O of Q U o ri a _ - — To Ili .=ri ri a ui aD n cJ a iti co 0o ^ i :F: I- '� 11101011 ( % O o13Ocoo >.� • / R r/ Li c ,• CT C+ :J � .: .0 p fluhhi ! .i•1,..1\O 1 h m .> ¢ U CD 4-.. 'm E' �I/„', / ' \{.{ O c f. .- 0 5i 1 „1'/.% 2L10(0 L . w : f . : .)....„0.... . --- , t, •'' - :; 1 c'i'' -- . , ei,_..e.- •••:'- --. ', ! --,-,..;... -: ..',;,,,,,,I, ,,-- e,.......\ -:-..71, •;,..,;••• r-:, ..sit,....c-p ...1.. ..... / .. \ ,S 1 \L...,•;;..,...,. (§IA Z5 ._;•_01.-•.7.; tr. jrt 1 • . iNts... ... --,....-;•-•:N. , - •-: ,------- ' .-- - 00.71.' ; ---N., : t '"4:-.-:-'..."-''''-.•-•-•:i... • ' • : ,, 1 1\,- ..,.: .1 t--... ., . ,)//7--.... r-,;:-•-=• r A r • I ••••••• • I-- , . a).1\\,,N,‘‘;•!,„.t,,,z_\.:A...-.• .4,..,.. / . _.:__ ,,,;..j,,.,. ' r .,,,..1.10 I • ., ...,.. 1;4, ••,71...--,-,— 7, ‘ - r':_in:1 •• \ , „":' lk 4:,1.4 . 11. il /),Arf55,"\ac.....,;.4.,:ti, 1de, . ... ••\' i •-. • 1+ I +<,1k.?'''':.."'i'i61'.;0.1t, if 1 Li i ,..11];,1 \ i - '''?r ; ;...• :.''- 11 .';-:7- ';'.;'="7......• .: ;/ _ 'V.!. i::.:.h. ,:f .,, ../, 1 .--•-7- -.!,..(..': ;1‘1 1;•.. (6.11 :f(......,/,ill .- i, ce--, \--' ...,ez,j2 .,..:' _- - - j _ -,,;"r.,..:.:....:-_.„ .__ ..:••••-- ------- ;1; ' t .1 /1 -N1/4,-,1 ----_-,•'44.. 1.1: \l/ I Jilt--P. 1 - ‘ 1 4- 1 ---- ----:---,- 1 .-4...... • ,-,(--. --ar ,% %?Ar... 1 ..c I ....- --,....!- -i:'!, -,-:__-:.•tt:_:2„„,,:„2„,:-1, ;7.1. •el .-„,12,1j.. _I i ,...LA"......7...-..-.- ‘f \ ‘-;-- c 4')•.0',,,,.i N.. (4. --- 0..- :t,, .. u'l - -',,,-. , _ .-..--:-.. -. ....-.:---:-,.......;:e- ....:.•;4 - 1-• • - ,n-V. _I ''" 71'''-' • . .-7—j le___,.J,T....L.isk..., -'- ..\\N r;-.--.14a--i-.14.1.1•:-74.frli 631------he ' 7.;----r—i-i4A_I -11 ; .\. • • •= , t It ....., • ; -1. 4• -, 1,.741"-----.."7........ ' ....• 01 1i -Al. / I r__...7,,,_,..,....,,,,. ... ,,,\il ..,. ,r.,..v..::....,...,...: ',.'7 '-.. fC 1-0;!2!!!1,..-,, f..1.,I. . -... L ,I.1 -.1. ff 4 -- -- -.)1 ! ' .$-;* 7•..--v-i. -7 e 47:i. i!1,-*F,'. ''. :.- .*-7:„*.s.: '''‘ •:',',. .41" i j'' ; „.?.. i 1, •,:.0. ,.:.?' L-,-,..- iti .._,.. •••:•‘...0, ,3'tN%-- ..1..'.1 1 ij,7 r= :247).1'4:ri 2 • , 1,\,r---1,-- --2---'--------,2, ' -I,....-;.,-.....:.... .-----...__--,,:;k-' 4'ri 1.; ‘ 441'"'si.7.41 ,1- .C--). . .. !..7:-:.. •----------7,. I --v•0•-*--"i (II( ,7 IL.---_--\f)s,,, ...__• .1.,..„\\ct. ',,,-;.. .,-.7..(.-.i,i--..v't_l_ ..-.3.2_,-,zs , i•r:.:-.;.._ ,), fie.-, 3 - 3,...., , , , .3,, - . 33i L.; , 3. ,..„3 •3.. ...3,-.-_-_. ........3.„ • : , 3„,• 3., , ir:;)..., .p..,,,,..c . _i ...,, ,,, , 1- .)n • •• ...:•$,;.. • - 4: ........- 1 ..v.,;,,._%Ter. / , 1 0 „-4..1 A,,...-.. ,,,,r 1 , „,;.„, . ., ...i,..‘.. . .1:;•-.., ::n ,..,...{ .; I .i;),:i> -I./Z/A:.___. III t..I „,#/'-‘ g. 1/2..--.4:1 ;-",----:•_---...4-r-.::::::,,=-:41..10,,,t.-!..1,L• i e-,---- i s____) _..,..-. !....-..... ,,,,- ‘,. :/ j!, ‘4--; ''1' ...'""\."4,4.'4"/... ' 1 ;/-- '''.."--14-9. 013 .,/,'',C.Itiej .:•?'/'V1/4.: t o.r...•,..:-‘4', ... : 4%,„,,,,1. , , .„../• • 1 _. ,:-•7.-•‘, e • ) '''''' \ *a 4 t° - S'‘,./t-*'').1 4 1 - : ,....... a) •Itl. •.;e....‹. ..C.. ....• ; ;• `. .... •,.... • •--T, -....0 , 12 ' --•? "'-'1.- '•: ....•"/.44.s•rrt.%'• I , 1 • • .itly ... : : • _ ,....-.'..--:".....-.:.:.A..,!. %I..... -e:I;.•;;;;....rj,.:.:.-:;i...tzn'tt:f-V.',-4,11,-*..t.,,c4.. s.!..!r, ...7:4, , 1.•:- /•// :•i ,-----A :•-•"_ \;':7/1!?-•!' ;.• .-.,7%/, ,:;-.„-..1.:;•:,1,•—'••-•to-L..7-.:1%;41_ 1 4.5-i ,N 7-4:B..• ,.,., : : 4.-• . •-. •-;....:,---.: (;:--::- 1` 4, L.-.--,3-' „,-.:-...?;'. x:-"Thr 4 1! . .- '4' tt-t; ...: ..?i, ./4.114\ i-..-ol.-.1)/c•-• .. \ • .,. - 1 :..,:.--"--. ...4- .„--,...,,/, ;L-1,?:::..,./1 .d - ,:...:.. .A Ici, ;)..- • • 1 i;';;,...-,•.„..,.. "......< .t• 2.-)/(7; \ II 1'.( i ....:,.... 1; ..j•-k,_:.fi :.l'4..' .C.V•:5 - L'I-:' '1.;',S 1,41r .,,e,S87-. ' ---- .__ .,,----......!=...7'.7" ;..t• 1-..--_ . ii ",s- 4.. '4:--11:-(-: -...r.------•.• ,•'e. .,.0-•- , . - :: .: " • • N.,---•••---- - /em. nii•::-..,.....; ,, 1.:,,s,,:,,,,,.., . ,.. — .., 1. ::-::.-;:,.....: r.:-. ... -•• :i wg----,: :; . ..T.-----3`..),1-C.....'',..1.f.... ..L. .crk ', .•1:. ..:-.' •:.' -7,/ ii :-•"="-=" ,,,,e.''-'i. h. -:------ s:-•,4 ii,.--- 77.2:---,....;:.c , :i..•---- ------ . cv '''-:::..'f:.-.77.- .1 t: -1\t- .. N-1,.:;,I 0,.%_••:. ,,ot,"'-i ".5 e-.r-•-: -1. : - :. ...;,..:•i•... .: -. ',/ If k .., Z... _ . . ._.,..- . ' _, ,_,.,,,...4.--1.-, v:: .•.-.600 d. 1 ••\-.--16--;•-ei--3;•-:•:-•-e---=-7•77.-';7:-.---74,--1 „ •••'.t,''•; ;, ,. • P.1 L• •-•• 4:-..i....; '1'4444240,'"- '.. %4 .. 044.`,//j,,,I.' i I N4c-,-\..''':.,- ' . 41 ..) L.. ---f't 1Z/1, ..N.)'..1i4e.: ....: .',',..1•"„... s', ‘ "4.'ir•-•'--1,1. i -- • V.v t b 61 ,,'.-.''. 1 1 1 i `. • 1', aq, .. Al."-, ,,,,, - I 1-8 ''<:. ': !-- • . \ .. _„,„t4-_x—.,, ,,, I,!_.f. ___4 in . -.._,..);; , .-, -- ,-- ,-,„_._,..,— '' --\i.:0.-.:----1:-:: "•:. 4, , . ri ;-,‘ 1 .g 1 ..W4 rel -. 1 -1, -.,. --• . •\,•1 I i t. 1t. ••• • .... '9'.ilj.- ...: t il \ \ ! tt, tot/ \ \ i ' - --- ' " ' '. / . . _,; .-. - r"_ _I_____\% _:_ik,•: .t.so".. til: ? ...:' _fro 6 ',. , --_-: 1, -,.. ...., --„),3- -.. 7 ; ., - - •-.• , . :". • 1.3 11_::.--711; I •'...-N :,:t \\/•- • (::,„...;•;.4.,.-':-....,, , ,.. i. •1 iii '.2-§ k(f)j)17 01 Vi 7 § I .1::';,,„,,7-._:,-!.;i 1:‘:!t;•-•-c,'), / .- ,,, • .---::. 4 •4'' - 1)':' ''•••1..'i..(•.A ' .( ' 42 ,. 14 I I , 44 .),•/` (<9.:jr.a:9 ....1-4-,_ _ : 124 z----- '''4 1'..07 ,7- j 'A a,/.,..J. •••• : 's \ ...';''."1. 4t :e‹,,,I 4 ---'-'- -! • ' -..----------•-•_ -----7-e, ii, , 0---7, ,, ---- ..7..-=.- -------4-1-.....- --..------ J, — 4:•,•4'' (,4.1•71 -- ' ) ' ' 14 '4 z.....-_44-., .4 • - . '''-- 1 - \ 1-..4 '"-4 20 , . c.1 .. - c.1 .,- •c •c(..) . 0 ..... < 2 (>1 240/ • '......,:•1 ch 5 a ii 14.41.146 Riley- Purgatory Creek Watershed District k' '~ 8950 COUNTY ROAD #4 7. • • 4-.. • EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55344 Ith N.ilk September 19, 1980 Mr. Chris Enger City Planner • City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Re; Lake Idlewild Development: Eden Prairie Dear Mr, Enger: The engineering advisors for the Board of Managers of the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District has reviewed the preliminary plans as submitted to the District for the Lake Idlewild Development in Eden Prairie. The following policies and criteria of the Watershed District are applicable for this develop- ment: 1, The District notes that 13 office buildings are to be constructed adjacent to Lake Idlewild. This lake is a landlocked lake and the District will require that all structures have basement or first floor elevations set a minimum of 2 feet above the natural overflow elevation from this basin until an outlet is provided. Once an outlet has been installed for the lake, the District will. then require that the basement or first floor elevations of the structures be set at a minimum of 2 feet above the calculated 100-year frequency flood level of the lake. • 2. The Minnesota Department of 'Natural Resources has determined that the natural ordinary highwater elevation for Lake Idlewild is 853.3. Any work done below this elevation will require a Chapter 105 Work in Public Waters Permit from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. If the work remains above this elevation, in accordance with Section • E(2) of the District's revised rules and regulations, a grading and land alteration permit must be obtained from the Watershed District. Accompanying this permit application, a detailed erosion control plan outlining how sediment will be controlled both during and after construction must be submitted to the District for review and approval. Mr. Chris Enger . Page 2 September 19, 1980 3. A detailed storm sewer plan must be submitted to the District for review and approval. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this development at an early date. If you have any questions regarding the District's commedts, please contact us at 920-0655. Sincerel• , 0/ Rob rt C. Obermeye BARR ENGINEERING C . Engineers for the District RCO/111 c: Mr. Frederick Richards Mr. Fritz Rahr • • 209 y • NE ��\N+ 4ya Minnesota a / a Department of Transportation 1 District 5 cp 2055 No. Lilac Drive ""OFTO Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422. September 2, 1980 (ala)545a761 Mr. Chris Enger, Planning Director Eden Prairie City Hall 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 In reply refer to: 315 S.P. 2744- T.H. 169/212 Plat review of Lake Idlewild Office Development located west of TH 169 between Eden Road and the North Junction of West 78th Street in Section 14, Township 116, Range 22 in the City of Eden Prairie Hennepin County Dear Mr. Enger: We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. We find the plat acceptable for further development with consideration of the following ( comments: - Although the highway right-of-way appears adequately defined, Mn/DOT is not relinquishing any property claims or rights on our rights-of- way, as currently occupied, through this plat approval process. - The proposed parking lot construction over the Mn/DOT drainage easement - will be allowed; however, no buildings can be constructed on it. - We suggest the proposed entrance west of TH 169 be moved further west. A good design would be to combine the two entrances off of Eden Road into one entrance at the common property line. This will be more compatible with future access to the property south of Eden Road when it is developed. If you have any questions in regard to the above continents, please contact our District Layout, Research and Development Engineer, Mr. J. S. Katz at 545-3761 extension 150. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincrlrely, /fl ,',///),, . ,t(,.,..:1 e'% I 1-7/2% W. M. Crawford, 1'.E.i District Engineer/' cc: Charles Weaver Metropolitan Council Mike Reiter Hennepin County Surveyor's Office An Equal Opportunity Employer 'E}O 2q 10 / 4 0 :� I LAIN OFFIC CS HAROLD LCVANOCR • ARTHUR OILLLN LeVander, Gillen, Miller & Magnuson t — cf2OQ HOGCH C. MIL LER PAUL A. MAG Nt'}pry 'U� J� HAROLD LLVANDLR. UTH J., 402 DROVERS HANK BUILDING • 03) SO CONCORD SINELT V PAUL H. ANDERSON `- TIMOTHY J. KUNTZ SOUTH ST. PAUL, MIN NESOTA]TOTS • TELEPHONE 16121 A]110]1 DANIEL J.RCESON • July 1, 1980 • I1 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Eden Prairie Eden Prairie City Hall 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minresota 55344 Re: Storm Sewer Outlet - Idlewild Pond • r Mr. Mayor and .Members of the City Council: Enclosed herewith please find a Petition to the Eden Prairie City Council to consider the local improvement of providing a storm sewer outlet to Idlewild Pond. We would appreciate it if the City would take the necessary steps to consider this improvement and to authorize its installation. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly you • rs, • • aul H. Anderson • cc: Roger. Ulstad - City Manager Carl Jullie - City Engineer Chris Enger - City Planner PHA:lc • • • 2U11 _ • • CITY OF EDEti PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA • PETITION FOR LOCH. IJ:i'3:OVEA:ENT • To The Eden Prairie City Council: The undersigned property owners herein petition the Eden Prairie City Council to consider making the following described•improvements(s): (General Location) Sanitary Sewer { tgatcrmain X Stona Sewer To provide outlet for Idlcwild Luke Street Paving Other • - Street Address or Other Names of Peti "oners Legal Description of • nr er ovine pro rty to be ry Seed (M s — p Y_ r: Fi terly end of ild Lake /� �.�!�✓ __ LANU'SAyil INC. a fj •1Ji'l . ii�� .,rig, -rrPs a) ( (For City Use) Date Received -1 fzl(0 Project No. •t'i•i 31fr Council Consideration • • • • 79-664 PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION' I INVESTIGATION . Proposed Commercial • Development SW quadrant West 78th Street S. Niy 169 Eden Prairie, MN LAND' SAKE • December 19, 1979 • • � {{I 4 i ENGINEERING TESTING 2413 LI/ • ENGINEERING TESTING APR( PA UI 6700 S.'County Rd.18,P.O.floc 05106,Mph..MN/612941 560U •xolew+..4w+oT«++ :THEN .NNE50TA 3219 E.19th Avenue,H+hbmg,MN 55746 44 snot PE. t.n+••e 1 RAL MINNESOTA 1570•24th Ave.N.,P.O.64.109.St.Cloud,MN 56301 oe.e.ttue r.t....... UTHISUPENIOR 5431 Aupatk Stud.,Duluth,MN 55811 THORN MINNESOTA 40•16th St.5.E.,Rothestrt,MN 55901 December 19, 1979 Land' Sake • One Appletree Square, Ste. 1141 Bloomington, MN ;j E, Attn: Mr. Tom Driscoll ' y'6'y" Re: 79-664 PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION !. Proposed Commercial Development SW quadrant West 78th Street & Hwy. 169 Eden Prairie, MN Mr. Driscoll: As you requested we have completed a preliminary foundation investigation consisting of six borings for the proposed develop- ment. At the time of the field investigation, two additional borings were requested by the property owner. The borings indicated conditions similar to those anticipated, that is, various depths of fill overlying generally suitable soils. Thus, in almost in all areas of the site some corrective earthwork will be necessary to obtain proper foundation support. The complete boring results along with our engineering analysis and recommendations are contained in the attached report. Should you have any questions regarding this report or if we may provide additional services for you, please feel free to contact us at your convenience. Very truly yours, . BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING INC. am es J. Craig, Jr., P E: Senior oo' ct E „i eel* • C. . , • Vice President - Engineering JJC/CGK:jp ' CONSULTING ENGINEERS/SOILS AND MATERIALS MEI Onnnys•Founnahun Enp.nert.ny,nd R ec nmmenu,:.ons•Inspection ul Con,ttuct.on•M,tenat Teshnp of Sods,Concteu dnd Rudhnp CoiAponttU ui�L 1 December 19, 1979 t. 79-664 PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION Proposed Commercial Development SW quadrant West 78th Street & Hwy. 169 Eden Prairie, MN A. INTRODUCTION: ' A.1 . Purpose: The purpose of the investigation was to provide a preliminary evaluation of subsoil and groundwater conditions with regards to foundation support of the proposed office buildings. A.2. Scope: Six standard penetration test borings were completed at your request. Two additional borings were completed at the property owners request. Engineering analysis and recom- mendations were then prepared based on the results of the borings. A.3. Available Information: You provided us with a plan sheet ' showing proposed locations of 8 buildings. Power auger borings completed by us previously for a proposed sanitary sewer have also been attached for additional information. B. TESTING: B.1 . Borin1 Locations and Elevations: The boring locations were staked in the field by you an3 are shown on the attached sketch. Surface elevations were referenced to the manhole cover located approximately 300 feet west of Highway 169 on the south side of West 78th Street. An assumed bench mark elevation of 100.0 feet was used. B.2. Borinp,_Methods and Procedures: The borings were completed on December 5 and 6, 1979 with a truck-mounted core and auger drill in accordance with ASTM D1586 "Penetration Test and Split Barrel Sampling of Soils". Using this method, the bore hole is advanced with the hollow-stem auger to the desired test depth. Then a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches drives a standard 2- inch OD split barrel sampler a total penetration of 11,2 feet below the tip of the hollow-stem auger. The blows for the last foot of penetration are recorded and are an index of soil strength characteristics. Soil samples were generally taken at 21/2-foot . increments to the 15-foot depth and at 5-foot increments to the termination depth in each of the borings. Use of the hollow-stem auger eliminated the driving of casing and the need for jetting water. ENGINEERING TESTING 21- I 79-664 Land' Sake -2- December 19, 1979 B.3. Soil Classification: Mineral soils encountered in the y borings were visually a6 T—manually classified in the field by the crew chief in accordance with ASTM D2487 "Unified Soils Classification System" and ASTM D2488 "Recommended Practice for { Visual and Manual Description of Soils". A copy of ASTM D2487 is attached. All samples were then returned to the laboratory for verification of the field classifications by a Soils Engineer. Representative samples will remain in this office for a period of 60 days to be available for your examination. i B.4.. Groundwater Measurements: Immediately after taking the final sample in the bottom of the borings, the borings were probed with the hollow-stem auger in the ground to check for groundwater. In addition, immediately after removal of the 1 auger, the borings were probed and the depth to cave-in and the e presence or absence of water was noted. When posible, the bore holes were rechecked several hours later. The borings were then immediately hackfilled. C. RESULTS: 1 C.1 . Lons: Log of Boring sheets indicating the depth and iden- tificaEn of the various soil strata, the penetration resistan- ( ces, and water level information are attached. C.2. Soils Encountered: The borings encountered 3 to 12 feet of fill overlying glacial till, topsoil or organic clays. The fill was generally silty sand to sandy clay. Along the east and south side of the lake the fill contained considerable rubble debris. At boring ST-3 a rather soft to soft lacustrine silty clay was encountered between the 11 and 17-foot depth underlain by sandy clay glacial till. Boring ST-6 also encountered a rather soft clay below the fill and topsoil. This stratum was between the 14 and 17-foot depths. Boring ST-1A, taken 30 feet from boring ST- 3, encountered suitable soils at the 7-foot depth (elevation 82). The upper 7 feet consisted of fill and topsoil. C.3. Groundwater: The groundwater, as measured in the bore holes either immediately after completion or as much as 7 hours after completion of the boring, was between elevation 82 and 85. The surface of the lake is currently at elevation 83.9. Thus it would appear that the groundwater level at the bore hole location is essentially at the level of the lake. Fluctuations in ground- water levels may occur with annual and seasonal variations. D. ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: D.1 . Proposed Construction: Eight, one to two-story office . buildings are proposed for this site. We anticipate foundation 2,1 ENGINEERING TESTING 1 y • 79-664 • Land' Sake -3- December 19, 1979 • loads will be relatively light. Floor grade elevations have not been established. D.2. Foundation_SupPort: As the existing fill on the site was placed in an uncontrolled manner and contains debris and possibly has buried organic soils, we recommend complete removal of all fill prior to foundation preparation. Below is tabulated the anticipated excavation depth at the boring locations. The actual • excavation depths should be determined by observation by a Soils Engineer. Anticipated Approximate Excavation Excavation • Boring # Depth (feet). Elevation 5T-1 6 80 ST-2 6 81 ST-3 11-17* 76-70 ST-4 12-14 77-75 ST-5 9=13 91-87. ST-6 14-17* - 77-74 - ST-1A 7 • 82 . i ST-2A 11 84 * Excavation depths will depend on proposed finished grade and actual building loads. Also excavation observation and further testing should he done to further evaluate the soils in these • areas. Since most of the fill is silty sand to sandy clay it will not he suitable for placement below water. Most of the excavations will extend below the water level. Thus, a clean granular fill will likely need to be imported to the site for placement below the water level. Once the fill has been placed above the water level the on-site existing fill could be reused for foundation support. All deleterious material should be removed from the fill prior to its reuse. All fill should he compacted in layers to a minimum of 92% of modified Proctor density. Allowable design bearing pressures of up to 3000 psf could then be used. At the location of boring ST-3 removal of the soft clays between the 11 and 17-foot -depths"_ may- not be necessary if time is available to ply a sur.ch .,ar e The existing fill and organic 1 topsoil should be removed-and replaced with compacted fill up to the proposed floor grade. Then additional fill, about 5 feet, should be placed over the entire building area. This surcharge should then be allowed to consolidate the soft clays for 6 months 1 1 year. Settlement plates should he installed and monitored • to evaluate when the surcharge could be removed. Further testing ENGINEERING TESTING 2111 79-664 Land' Sake -4- December 19, 1979 in this area should be done prior to initiating a surcharge pro- cedure. D.3. Parking lot Construction: We would anticipate that the • parkingTot subgrade soils would likely vary between a silty sand and sandy clay. We also anticipate traffic would primarily be Cars although some truck traffic may occur. Based on the boring data available and assumptions regarding likely subgrade soils, a parking lot section consisting of 5 inches of Class 5 and 3 inches of asphalt should he satisfactory for all parking lots. Again, as design for this commerical. development proceeds, further evaluation of soils may modify the parking lot section. • D.4. Additional_ Investigation: When the building locations are being finalized it is recommended that additional soil borings be taken -to further evaluate the foundation conditions at each loca- tion. E. GENERAL REMARKS: The analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are • based upon the data obtained from the 8 soil borings performed at :he locations indicated on the attached sketch. Variations may occur between these borings, the nature and extent of which may not become evident until construction. If variations are encoun- tered, it will be necessary to make a re-evaluation of the recom- mendations of this report after performing on-site observations during the construction and noting the characteristics of any variations. Such variations may result in additional foundation costs and it is suggested that a contingency be provided for this purpose. To permit correlation of the soil data obtained to date with the actual soil conditions encountered during construction and to provide continuing professional responsibility for the confor- mance of the construction to the concepts originally contemplated in this report and to the plans and specifications, it is recom- • mended that we be retained to develop and perform the necessary observation and testing program for the excavation and foundation phases of the project. If others perform the recommended observations and/or testing of • construction, professional responsibility becomes divided since in doing so, they assume responsibility for verifying that the soil conditions throughout the construction areas are similar to those encountered in the borings or recognizing variations which would require a change in recommendations. AI? ENGINEERING TESTING r _IL—J t__�.) L) �eee MN '-\ I 1 ....1 ,,., �roW �.,e�0 .o sT-; - M.9 . ` I:721 r• —1 , .1\ : ( sT--3 } Sr¢ ` a 1 \._ 0 \ )--\-\- _ 1 ( 1 L. - 4ç\\ I y O .x , 0 • . , " •••\:-;.;__,..—...._:=7.--1 ; I . // o o boo • O FSecenl/y e,.,,(Ieie.z/ 8oriri.s 76 for Sewer A/,jnM�nl' O F3or-.is fern?/(r'e4/ in .Ser0// t a]q Pro/ease/60,9nerc/a I Ave./spc ee71 ENGINEERING TESTING $01"NONE L O G OF BORING INE[a1NG TCS_7: PROJECT: 79-664 ProposedBORING: ST-1 Commercial LOCATION: Development S.W. Quadrant of W. 78th See Attached Sketch Street & Highway 169 Eden Prairie, MN DATE: 12/5/79 ISCALE: ln_41 ASTM Tests or Notes Elev. Depth D2487 Description of Materials BPF WL 86.4 0 Symbol (ASTM: D2488) SM SILTY SAND, fine to medium-grained SurSurfacecedevatihesman- brown, wet, loose. hole cover near the (Possibly Fill) 6 N.E. property corner. • �.3.4 3 _,__C -.---------- a-g — Assume bench mark SM-SC SILTYow CLAYEY SAND,lo fine-grained, ® elevation = 100.0'. o c brown, moist, loose. i (Possibly Fill) 4 u 80.4�b — - -- SC CLAYEY SAND, fine-grained,.with a trace of roots, wet, loose. - 9 . 78.4 _ 8 _ (Glacial Till)__ SC CLAYEY SAND, fine-grained, with o a trace of Gravel, grayish-brown, wet, loose. 6 c o 74.9 11 (Glacial Till) __5 - - — SC CLAYEY SAND, fine to medium- - ' grained, light brownish-gray, 15 S moist to wet, medium dense. ? 10 0 0 (Glacial Till) n. v 0 66.9. L . — — v CL SANDY CLAY, with a trace of * 14 ° _.6 ---2Q'.5- ,n *Gravel, gray, moist, stiff. (Glacial Till) Water level down 15' with 19' of hollow-stem auger in ground. ce Water level down 9.5' immediately after withdrawal of auger. u u '^ Water level down 4.5' 6 hours after completion of boring. Boring immediately backfilled. 2026 • L O G OF BORING IENGINECRiNG TESTING JS2Rittr ST-3 De PROJECT: 79-664 Proposed nc Conercial LOCATION: Development S.W. Quadrant of W. 78th See Attached Sketch Street & highway 169 Eden Prairie, MN DATE: 12/5/79 SCALE: 1""4' ASTM Tests or Notes Elev. Depth D2487 Description of Materials BPf W 87.6 0 Symbo (ASTM: D2488) SM-SC Fill; mostly SILTY CLAYEY SAND, fine-grained, with a trace of Gravel, brown, moist, medium 12 dense. a 0 • 83.6 4 c SC & Fill; CLAYEY SAND, gray, with a E CL layer of SILTY CLAY, black, moist 5 81.6 6 - _.r.athar___842.£1 O SM Fill; mostly SILTY SAND, with a >- trace of asphalt, brown, moist 5 p: 6 8 o we t_ . u CL SANDY CLAY.to SILTY CLAY, dark brown, moist to wet, with a trace a 6 of roots, medium. o (Possible Topsoil) c 766 11_- gray and brown, wet, CLSILTY CLAY, g Y . rather'soft to soft. 4,. . 1 a 0 u (Lacustrine) 3 M.C. 27.0%0 w 0 70.6 —17 _. —CL SANDY CLAY, brown, moist to wet, it ii rather stiff. l 19 _ (Glacial Till) f o SM-SC SILTY CLAYEY SAND, with a trace a of Gravel, brown, wet, medium 27 c dense. (Glacial Till) i oCL CLAY, with lenses of SAND and Gravel, gray, moist to wet, rather stiff. n- q 62_1.__25.5 (Glacial Till) . o Water • level down 20' with 20' o.f I n hollow-stem auger in ground. N Water level down 12' immediately l , after withdrawal of auger. Water level dotal 5.3' 3 hours { after completion of boring. Boring immediately backfllled. . LOG OF BORING pi:V/11111.11j INEERING TESTIN PROJECT: 79 664 Proposed Commercial BORING: ST-4 Development LOCATION: S.W. Quadrant of W. 78th See Attached Sketch Street 6 Highway 169 Eden Prairie, MN DATE; 12/5/79 'SCALE: 1"=4' ASTM Tests or Notes Elev. Depth D24B7 Description of Noteri°Is BPf WL 89.2 0 Symbol (ASTM: D24B8) SM Fill; SILLY SAND, brown and black, moist. 87.2 2 _______ SM Fill; mostly SILTY SAND, fine 11 • ✓ to medium-grained, brown, moist, owith a trace of concrete, asphalt o and bricks. e * *unable to sample due I to concrete. o j. Z. 27/a .cL u 0 20 C c 0 77.2 12 �- CL SANDY CLAY, olive, gray and brown, 4 Dwet, rather soft. • 75.2 14 ___ ___(GlaciaLTi1]) • u SC CLAYEY SAND, fine-grained, brown, 13 moist to wet, medium dense. 13 '- 73.2 16 (Glacial Till) CL SANDY CLAY, with a trace of Gravel, 13 0 brown, moist, very stiff. 0 0 o (Glacial Till) R 19 O _6, Q 7. 25 toWater level down 7.6' with 19' of hollow-stem auger in ground. Water level down 4.8' immediately 1 after withdrawal of auger. a oc Water level down 4' 1 hour after completion of boring. 0 0 to Boring inenediately backfilled. LOG OF BORING el :_ii-Liuti. INEEnING TESTPROJECT: 79-664 Proposed Commercial BORING: ST-5 Development LOCATION: S.W. Quadrant of W. 78th Street h Highway 169 See Attached Sketch Eden Prairie, MN DATE: 12/5/79 SCALE: 1"=4' ASTM Tests or Notes Elev. Depth D2487 Description of Materials BPF WL 100.2 0 Symbol (ASTM: D2488) SM Fill; SILTY SAND, fine to medium- grained, with a trace of ;ravel, _9.8;2 _2 . _brawn.-moist_—_ --- SC Fill; mostly CLAYEY SAND, fine- 1Y • a. grained, with a trace of Gravel, m o brown, with asphalt, brick and c concrete debris, moist. 18 v •a 32 ! c 91.2 9 i -o SM-SC SILTY CLAYEY SAND, fine-grained, with a trace of Gravel, brown, _15 0 moist, ,medium dense. J i 0 f 88.2 12 _ _ (Probable Fill) •0;_8L2 _13 SM-SC SILTY CLAYEY SAND, fine-grained,* 19 - CL SANDY CLAY, dark brown to brown, j moist, rather stiff tg very stiff v 12 , w i O 17 0 (Glacial Till) `o -o 24 0 79.7 20.5 -- vi *dark brown, moist. (Possible Topsoil) , • 0 Water level not encountered with t 19' of hollow-stem auger in o ground. v a . Water level not encountered to u cave-in depth of 15' immediately ✓ after withdrawal of auger. Boring immediately backfilled. LOG OF BORINGL.I.a. -N l:1.�Lu NCINUMK,.TESTING PROJECT: 79-664 Proposed Cocncrcial BORING: ST-6LOCATION: Development S.W. Quadrant of W. 78th Sae Attached Sketch Street & Highway 169 Eden Prairie, MN DATE: 12/6/79 'SCALE: 1„=4' Tests or Notes asrrt Elev. Depth D2487 Description of Materials BPF L 91.0 0 Symbol ( 488) SM Fill; mostly SILTY SAND, brown, with CLAYEY SAND, dark gray, moist _ 10 0:oI 0 87.0 4__ -- - c CL Fill; SANDY CLAY to CLAYEY SAND, E brown and dark brown, wet, soft 3 Li to medium. l 0 > i 7 u i 81.5 9.5 _ ___.-. _ ..__ • DL SILTY SANDY CLAY, black, slightly 4 c organic, with grass and roots,o wet, rather soft. c 4 `o (Probable Topsoil) 14 o CL CLAY, gray, with a lense of SAND, o wet, rather soft. 4 . u 74.9 17 — ---- (Alluvium)• `B CL SILTY CLAY, with a trace of Gravel, 7 a gray, wet, medium. 72:0_ 19 (Glacial Till) --- CL SANDY CLAY, with a trace of Gravel, c brown, moist, rather stiff. * 9 in *(Glacial Till) T Water level down 15.8' with 19' of 1. a hollow-stem auger in ground. Water level down 9.4' inuncdlately • after withdrawal of auger. u Water level down 7' 4 hours after '^ completion of boring. aticrj 1 • LOG OF BORING 4..'�N ING TESTING l ENGINCERING TESTING PROJECT: 79-664 Proposed Commercial BORING! ST-IA Development LOCATION: S.W. Quadrant of W. 78th Street 6 Highway 169 See Attached Sketch f 4 Eden Prairie, MN DATE: 12/6/79 I$cA LE: 1"=4' ASTM Tests or Notes I Elev. Depth D2487 Description of Materials BPF WL 89.5 0 Symbol (ASTM: D2488) , SC Fill; CLAYEY SAND, fine-grained, j brown, moist, medium dense. i 11 1 T 0 85.5 4 _ -- e c CL SILTY SANDY CLAY, with a trace 1 - E of roots, dark gray to black, wet, 6 I) medium. t 82.5 7 (Topsoil) a • CL SANDY CLAY, with a trace of roots, 5 •Z gray and brown, wet, rather soft. t 80.5 9 (Glacial Till) — d CL SANDY CLAY, gray, wet, medium. 7 v . C 0 77.5 12 (Glacial Till) f I — CL -SANDY CLAY to CLAYEY SAND, with 16 g a trace of Gravel, brown, moist ) 75.5 14 _to wi't._stiff. Glacial Tilll u SC CLAYEY SAND, fine to medium- w grained, with a little Gravel, 20 r brown, wet, medium dense. i 72.5 17 (Glacial Till) j o SC CLAYEY SAND, fine to medium- 'El grained, with a trace of Gravel, 9 v gray, moist to wet, medium dense. i a -a (GIacial Till) 24 0 69_0__ 20.5 1 in Water level down 14.5' with 19' 1 of hollow-stem auger in ground. j Water level down 13' immediately 1 after withdrawal of auger. 6 n Water level dorm 7.6' 3 hours • v after completion of boring. o Ln u ii f • LOG OF BORING G NEEMNG TESTING , . � ST-2A PROJECT: 79-664 Proposed Commercial LOCATION: Development S.W. Quadrant of W. 78th See Attached Sketch Street 6 Highway 169 Eden Prairie, MN 12/6/79 SOME: 1"'4' DATE: ASTM BPF Tests or Notes u'j� Elev. Depth D2487 Description of Nhterials . (ASTM: D2488) 95.5 0 Symbo CL Fill; SANDY CLAY, with a trace of Gravel, brown, moist, rather soft to soft. 4 'o c i 2 i 7 u i 1 32 I u 2 with concrete debris. 4 86.5 9 brown and I � SC Fill; CLAYEY SAND, 8 black, wet, loose. 1 g 64=5 11 -'- wet, rather CL SANDY CLAY, brown, i o stiff. -9 1_ (Glacial Till) f p 81.5 --14-- CL SILTY CLAY, grayish-brown, with white leaching, moist, rather 9 i 79.5 16 -__-._ stiff. ._-(Glacial_Tll11------ i CL SANDY CLAY, with a trace of t IIGravel, grayish-brown, wet, very 18 IS a stiff. -o O (Glacial Till) 21 0 7 S_0__20 5_ -- - v1 Water level down 13.2' with 19' of hollow-stem auger in ground. o Water level down 16' immediately ii after withdrawal of auger. goring immediately backfilled. I c o u 's 1 , gtin 1 • L O G OF BORINGS ==-"" PROJECT: 76-87 Additional Soil Borings DATE: 9/8/76 Proposed Storm Sewer Extension SCALE: Eden Prairie, Minnesota 1"`4' • (, •BORING: B-4 LOCATION:3.00' S of BORING: B_B LOCATION: SU RF.ELEVA59 9 1 14NW corner of Section • SURF.ELEV: ' See Attached Sketch. 864.11 • Depth,. Description of Materials .)24g7 WL Depth Description{ot -materials ajsn1 WI FILL, SILTY SAND, brown, SM ;ILTY SAND, fine-grained, moist. • with a trace of gravel, SM 2 .irown, moist. SANDY SILT, slightly or- 11L e (Probable Fill) ganic, dark gray to blacc, 4 4 moist. 5 PI?AT black mr+t�r Pt :ILTY CLAY, plastic, with trace of gravel, slightly CL SANDY CLAY to SANDY SILT, CL-ID urpanic, moist. brown, wet. 7 (Topsoil) .** ;ILTY CLAY, slightly ;ANDY, plastic, with a CL trice of gravel, dark gray, moist. ]U (Weathered Till) SILTY CLAY, slightly or- CL ganic, dark gray, wet. 12 SANDY CLAY, brown, moist. CL 11 CLAYEY SILT, plastic, non l5 to slightly organic, * CL SANDY CLAY, plastic, with a trace of gravel, gray, • CL moist to wet. (Till) 20 20 {later level down 3' Water level not encountered immediately after with- to cave-in depth of 13' drawal of auger. immediately after withdras.al of auger. *black, moist.(Former Topsoii)(Organic Contents 4.3%) **(Organic Content`5.3%) - • + I zaB _ LOG OF BORINGS =- PROJECT: 76-87 Preliminary Soil Uorings DATE: 4/15/76 Proposed 78th Street Sewer Extention • Eden Prairie, MN SCALE: 1,, - 4' ' BORING: 8-5 LOCATION:690. SE of BORING:R-6 LOCATION: 980' SE o SURF.EZEV: NW corner of Section 14 SURF.ETEV: NW Corner of Section 860.8 860.5 . ASTH Depth _Description of Materials D?48? Wl Dfith Desui�tion of Materials 11.tg7`"7 : FILL, SILTY SAND, fine to SR . 1 mediors-rraine Ira ist. r FILL, SILTY SAhll, fine to SM FILL, CLAYEY SILT to M8 „o4 medium-grained, brown, moist. SANDY SILT, gray, moist F vi to Wet. a . w w a Q 6 r . p. 4.1 u 7 MUCK, dark gray, wet. Pt a w CLAYEY SILT, slightly or- ML a ganic, dark gray, moist w to wet. 9 .o 10 SILTY CLAY, with a trace CL a of gravel. bluish gray, MUCK, dark gray, moist. Pt wet. c 0 ( VI �. 14 a 16 P. SILTY SAND to CLAYEY SM-SC wSAND, fine to medium- Water level down 5' imme- wo grained, brown, wet. diately after withdrawal of auger. a a u a o. 20 u Water level down 6' immei b diately after withdrawal o of auger. u in • m C a u w 0 a v a a v ,n 21119. i . Y • LOG OF BORINGS =- PROJECT: 76-87 Additional Soil Borings DATE: 9/8/76 Proposed Storm Sewer Extension SCALE: Eden Prairie, Minnesota BORING: g_g LOCATION: BORING: LOCATION: SURF.ELEV: See Attached Sketch. SURF.ELEV: 8645 AS ASTH Depth DesueptIon of Materials D7487 WL Dc thl Description of Materials WL SANDY SILT, fine-grained, SM 2 with a trace of ravel, SAND, slightly silty, SP-St[ fine to medium-grained, brown, moist. (Probable Fill) SANDY CLAY, plastic, with C4 a trace of gravel, gray,**, SILTY SAND to SANDY SILT, dark gray, moist to wet. SM-1LL (Outwash) 11 SANDY CLAY, plastic, dark CL brown, moist. (Till) • 20 Water level down 7' 10 minutes after completion of boring. • 1 *brown, dry. (1'robabls j Fill) **moist. (Till) I • zg3o DESCRIPTIVE TERMINOLOGYi. SOIL INTRUSIONS 'ARTICLE SIZE IDENTIFICATION I. RELATIVE PROPORTIONS i. THICKNESS !. withalaw 0-10% i Bourdon oNf 3' Ienw 0—tB" with soar 11—20% Gta ,� seam 1B-—1" with over 20% 1. layer 1.._12.. t µate No. — i served alternating seems or Fine No.4—1/2" lenses of clays end 7 Send silo in Iake deposit COON. No. 4—No.10 ORGANIC CONTENT ',Mawr No.10—No.4i1 MOISTURE CONTENT For No,40—No.100 0_5dX non to slightly weenie 4. Very Fins No.190—No.200 Dry Ins than 5% No.than—.005 corn 6—10% slightly organic . • Moist under optimum m moisture 11—25% organic:JOY less .005 cogs Wet over optimum moisture 26—25% muck Waterbeednq saturated and 65s peat I 1 CONSISTENCY OF PLASTICITY OF SOILS WITH RELATIVE DENSITY OF COHESIVE SOILS LESS THAN 20%CLAY COHESIONLESS SOILS non plastic piuv.a^normrod eery soft 0— 1 BPF rough t anmooth, }. very loose • 5— 4 BPF 2— 3 BPF slightly plastic g ii' 5—10 BPF soft hard to .tepee rather soft 4— 5 BPF plastic har to thread waxy, Oe to dense 11—30 BPF medium 6— B BPFeasy to thread owaxy, I very 31—50 BPF 912 BPF SM BPF tether stiff 3— I eery dense stiff t3-16 BPF very stiff 17—30 BPF hard 30+BPF y: RELATIVE PROPORTIONS I. LABORATORY TESTS j OF GRAVEL � Organic Content% Dry Density,t i 0— 5% pp S Percent of Saturation,% i sorr a r""" 6—15% W D Wet Density,pd Specil it Gravity •Iitta MC Natural Moisture Content,% SG Cohesion and 11—50% LL Liquid Limit,% Angle of Internal Friction 31—50% Plastic Limit,% Bwive Strength PL qu Unconfined ComW PI Plasticity Index,% • Standard penetration test borings were advanced by 25"or 3h"ID.hollowatem augers unless noted other DRILLING NOTES: wise.Jetting wafer was co indicated to clean out auger prior to sampling only where indited on logs. Standard t penetration test borings we designated by the prefix"ST'ISplit Tuber. rs.Soil classification 4 Power auger borings were advanrrd by 4"or 6"diameter. m continuourtlite,solid stein auge samplesrbed weed to the surface end am therefore somewhat :` and strata depths are inferred rings gs afetu&sira ed by the Pr el is"8"• appro Hand eobin. wererngerbdrr an Hand probing were advanced manually with a 1%'•diameter probe and am limited to the depth Irpm which the probe can be manually withdrawn. Hand probings are indicated by the prefix"M', • CLASSIFICATION: Classification on logs is made by inspection in accordance with the Unified Soils Classitrcation System (see attached chard using visualmanual Procedure unless noted otherwise. editions.tits Observations were mode et the changesCreel in thetied Porosity oro it Indio of soil urea,d on the Ipm,1 weather m GROUND WATER: tq�aphy,etc All sarnpin ere taken with the standard 2"O.O.split•tube sampler,except where noted.TW indicates thin. . SAMPLING: well sesosturbed sample. Numbers indicate blown per loot recorded in standard penetration test,alto knower es"N"value. The sampler BPF: is set 6•'into undisturfed soil below the hollowstem auger.Drier^g resistances are then c u ted'd for M and third 6•increments and added to gel BPF. When they differ significantly,they re following form—2112 for the second and third 6"inrrerrentt respectively.( WH indicates that sampler pe^eeted soil under weight of hammer and rob done,driving not ne �rr . WH: A11 tests me in eccordrdo with applicable ds ASTM Mender . � NOTE: MIA rr/1 ENGINEERING TESTING 'h UNIFIED SYSTEM e CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES ASTM DESIGNATION D-2487 i. i , Group Typi cal Major Divisions Symbols Names Classification Criteria N S Well-graded gravels and Cu' Deo/D10 Greater than 4 u i' GM gravel-sand mixtures, (D30)2 0 f b little or no fines Ca ' p10 x D10 Between 1 and 3 N A^ 0. u-,5 u L. Poorly graded gravels and c °'mar " GP ravel-sand mixtures, Not meeting both criteria for CA w �p 1 $ v E b little or no flnes w. .o ar ? , "-r Atterberg limits plot w DiH u 0 , .0 ii o c Silty gravels, gravel- belay "A" line or Atterberg limits plot- a, i i° N 1 O C 9 r CH sand-silt mixtures plasticity index ting in hatched area In h C E di o N less than 4 are borderline w .° 'a V' Y"i C U ,L,,{,.L S r � T. =LL �werg limits plot classifications re- � U�U � j Clayey gravels, gravel- above "A" line and qui ring use of dual o $ 0 0 `� GC sand-clay mixtures plasticity index symbols ° , c d greater than 7 > , j A Well-graded sands and Cu- D60/D1D Greater than 6 A „ • L . SW gravellysands, little 2 ' v,o a. d E C (DX Between 1 and 3 0 o N z L. A v or no fines a s DID X D60 CC N Ov7 V-C Y -'ICa O •00 u o o a, u,n Poorlygraded sands and O z N 1. b .4: SP gravell sands, little Not meeting both criteria for SW u v H o 1 «t, ,0�L� or no fines - T a1a: E S A`6 Atterberg limits plot IR o " ,n c a x Silty sands, sand-silt below "A" line or Atterberg limits plot- A 'v,' d j �'A SM mixtures plasticity index less tang 1n hatched area q,� i $"ip ii c than 4 are borderline clas- 5$ a s Clayey sands, sand-clay Atterberg limits plot sificattyns requiring v o above "A" line and use of symbols ^>u" 1 SC mixtures plasticity index JTvvaa 9 greater than 7 I Inorganic silts, rock flour, silty or clayey N MI fine sand 1 u c d lnorga Tmays of low to _ __ ? v.-�, medium plasticity, gran- 6D plceticiiy chart , I d my o �' el ly Clays, Sandy clays• For oiassification of fins-I 4, 4,0'0 Silty clays, lean clays_ go grained eoiS,and fina fraction m of ouarsa-pnisd soils. :,"' Organic silts and organic w of Atterberg tonics soils. in CL o "' OL silty clays of low ,� ha tchrd area cra border:ins 1 N plas ti d ty O a:ossifications requiring •en • _._ ues of dual symbols. Inorganic silts, micaceous 3D•Ecoation of A-tin,' V"- m V. •1 P]-0.73 (LL-:0. CL FID or diatomaceous silts, °� N o Y ;, �.,,,, elastic silts 20 sue/;},q ex ',YE A n, (1)1gCil Inorganic clays of high n, , LL$ A o plasticity, fat clays 1i-_-�,_g_ ' ®ir1� „ N Organic clays of medium DO 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 BO 90 1D0 O 0'In OM to high plasticity Liquid limit Peat, muck and other 1 ,nly organic soils Pt highly organic soils Visual-manual identification 1, 1 .Z('32, ENGINEERING TESTING • LD-80-PUD-13 Lake Idlewild Townoffices CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 80-190 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LAKE IDLEWILD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND AMENDING THE 1968 GUIDE PLAN AND THE MAJOR.CENTER AREA PUD WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of Ordinance • 135 provided for the Planned Unit Development ( PUD ) or certain areas located within the City, and WHEREAS, the Lake Idlewild PUD is considered a proper amendment to the 1968 Comprehensive Guide Plan and the Major Center Area PUD, and • WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on Land Sake Inc.'s request for PUD approval for office-townhouse uses and recommended approval of the PUD Concept to the City Council, and WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on October 7, 1980, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: • 1. The Lake Idelwild PUD, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, attached • hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD approval as outlined in the application material dated July 25, 1980. 3. That the PUD meet the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated August 25, 1980. ADOPTED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie this • day of , 1980. • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: John Frane, City Clerk SEAL .?t133 • • LAKE IDLEWILD PROPOSED DESCRIPTION FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SOUTHERLY PORTION That part of Lots 21 and 19 Auditors Subdivision number 335 • and part of vacated County Road #2, all in Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of the northerly, line of Eden • Road, as currently established, lying westerly of the westerly line of Highway #169-212, and lying southerly of the easterly extension of the northerly line of RLS # 895. • EXHIBIT A au;4 1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 80-191 • RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF Lake Idlewild Townoffices • BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Lake Idlewild Townoffices • dated , a copy of which is attached hereto and amended as follows: is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances and amendments thereto and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the _ day of 19_. Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL • �y�5 1 October 7, 1980 ST( - OF MINNESOTA 1 CII OF EDEN PRAIRIE $ COUNTY OF HENNEPIN 1 The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows:_ 3310 ROGER ULSTAD Expenses $ 27.60 3311 OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. Liquor 872.18 4 3312 PAUSTIS & SONS Wine 646.65 i 3313 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. Liquor 789.27 3314 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. Wine 1,108.50 3315 BUTCH'S BAR SUPPLY Supplies-Liquor store 93.60 3316 TWIN CITY WINE CO. Wine 943.88 3317 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE • Liquor 1,489.05 ! 3318 GRIGGS, COOPER, & CO., INC. Liquor 1,567.05 3319 COMMISSIONER OF PERSONNEL Administration cost for social security 67.99 coverage 3320 FEDERAL. RESERVE BANK Payroll 12,712.85 4 3321 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE Payroll 1,038.00 3322 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS Payroll 29.50 3323 PERA Payroll 9,473.04 3324 GROUP HEALTH PLAN Insurance 988.74 i 3325 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD Insurance 642.38 3326 HMO SERVICES Insurance 1,305.63 3327 HMO SERVICES Insurance 122.30 3! WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE Insurance 367.80 3329 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN Insurance 6,036.02 1 3330 VOID OUT CHECK 90D.00 . 3331 PAUL J. DE LECDUR & JOYCE DE LECOUR Purchase Creekwood Park 49,90D.00 I 3332 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEF'S OF POLICE Conference-Police dept 19157.90 1 3333 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Postage 3334 VOID OUT CHECK 50.00 t 3335 HUMPHREY INSTITUTE Conference-Community Service 57.50 3336 MINNESOTA RECREATIDN & PARK ASSOC. Football team registration-Rec dept0 585 3337 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Registration-Liquor store 3338 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. Liquor 516.18 3339 OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. Wine 157.65 ; 3340 TWIN CITY WINE CO. Wine1,317.15 9 f 3341 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. Liquor 26 3342 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE Liquor 180..23 3343 BUTCH'S BAR SUPPLY Supplies-Liquor store 787 ' 3344 PAUSTIS & SONS Wine 780.10 301.10 3345 MIDWEST WINE CO. Wine 1,255.37 3346 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. Liquor343 00 3347 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN. Dues-Water dept 275.00 3348 CINDY M. PLANTE Refund of rent-September71 00 ' 3349 CRABRREE KITCHENS Expenses-Senior Citizen Center 2,21331 5 .9 3350 MULLER BOAT TOURS Expenses-Senior Citizen Center 0 3351 COMMISSIONER Of REVENUE August sales tax 73 .91 3;'- INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING Dues 76.00 ': 1 ; NORTH CENTRAL. SECTION AWWA Conference-Water dept 0 5.751 3354 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY Motor vehicle registration 3355 VOID OUT CHECK 1,470.00 3356 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. Liquor 70. 0 3357 TWIN CITY WINE CO. Wine 1,662.73, 3358 E.D. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. Liquor • iii2l € 9 I Page two Or( `)er 7, 1980 3359 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. Wine $ 384.22 3360 JOHNSON WINE CO. Wine 242.66 3361 OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. Wine 415.56 3362 MIDWEST WINE CO. Wine 612.18 3363 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Payroll 11,808.02 3364 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE Payroll 9,217.92 3355 DEPARTMENT OP PERSONNEL 2nd qtr Social Security-Payroll 12,760.42 3366 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE Payroll 1,038.00 3367 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS Payroll 29.50 3368 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK Payroll 150.00 3369 PERA Payroll 8,984.71 3370 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE Permit for special fuel tax 5.00 3371 JAMES W. HOEFT & SHARON HOEFT Acquisition of Anderson Lake Park 32,500.00 3372 DOCUMENTS SECTION Copies of Minnesota Criminal Code-Police dept 80.50 50 3373 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC. Motor vehicle registration 3374 VIT YUSAS Seminar-Water dept 170.000 0 3375 A & H WELDING & MFG. CO. Supplies-Bikeway 18 3376 ACRO-MINNESOTA, INC. Office supplies 146.4135.00 3377 ACTION RENTAL CENTER Equipment rental-Park dept 24.00 3378 ALISON ADAIR Refund-Rec dept 57,624.10 3379 ALLIED BLACKTOP CO. Seal coat streets 0.19 3380 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC. • Subscription-Water dept 3 64.00 3" ' EARL F. ANDERSON & ASSOC. Signs, paint-Park dept 2.70 3;;,,i SHAWN ANDERSON Refund-Rec dept .00 3383 TARYN ANDERSON Refund-Rec dept 6.0030 3384 ASSOCIATED WELL DRILLERS, INC. Service .00 3385 AUTOTRAAC DIAGNOSIS & REPAIR Test speedometer-Police dept 3 0.00 3386 BACHMAN'S Flowers-City Hall 3387 BRW Service-Temp Signal on TH 169, Dell Road, 5,196.18 TH #5 & West 7Bth Street & Mitchell Road, Anderson Lakes Parkway, Homeward Hills Road 13.00 3388 JAN BENEST Refund-Rec dept 3369 STEVE BERG Refund-Rec dept 17.0 13.00 3390 JAMES BLACK Refund on final utility bill 3391 BLUMENFELD SPORT NET CO. Tennis nets, basketball & volleyball nets 734.31 3392 BRAUN ENGIPIF.LRING TESTING, INC. Service-High Trails, Valley View Road, 1,313.35 Monitoring West 70th Street, Round Lake Estates 3393 BREDEMUS HARDWARE CO. Replaced door closer & stop-Public Works Bldg 152.96 3394 BROWN PHOTO Film-Assessing 589.4725 i 3395 CENTURY CAMERA, INC. Projector-Senior Citizen Center 51 47 3396 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS Weed trimmer-Water dept 121.00 3397 CHANHASSEN TIRE & AUTO U-Haul rental 149.021 3398 CHAPIN PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal ads 3399 CHFMLAWN Lawn application-Fire & Public Works Bldg. 267.001 3400 CITY OF BROOKLYN PARK Deposited utility bill should be Brooklyn Park 60.79 3401 CITY OF EDINA Model Stone inv. paid by Edina for manhole 18.001 blocks should have been City of Eden Prairie t 3w2 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION Testing & inspection traffic signals-THg5 & 190.721 78th Street ii 3403 CONOON-NAEGELE REALTY Service-Watermain extension on Washington 2,200.001 Avenue 424.79r 3404 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. Supplies-Community services 14 1' Y Page three • Oct ''er 7, 1980 3405 GARY CROOKS Fall brochure art work $ 5.00 3406 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CD. Desk signs 22.58 3407 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY Quicklime-Water dept 1,654.84 3408 WARD F. DAHLBERG Mileage 8.36 3409 OALCO Towel, cleaning supplies-Water dept 251.62 3410 DALSIN INDUSTRIES, INC. Iron-Park dept 657.00 3411 DAZED BOOKS Diaries-Water & Street dept 45.45 3412 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO. Hydrant flushing devices-Water dept 359.00 3413 DECATUR ELECTRONICS, INC. Repair radar-Police dept 64.97 3414 DORHOLT PRINTING & STATIONERY Office supplies 360.11 3415 JULIE EAGLE Refund-Rec dept 13.00 3416 ANN ECCLES Refund-Rec dept 20.50 3417 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT Custodial service 1,185.16 3418 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS Rings-Bikeway 174.60 3419 FEED-RITE CONTROLS, INC. Sulfate-Water dept 3,120.60 342D FINLEY BROS. ENTERPRISES Tennis court landscaping 36,334.00 3421 FIRE SAFETY & COMMUNICATIONS CORP Strobe lights-Water dept 516.00 3422 DON FLOM Refund-Rec dept 10.00 3423 FLOYD SECURITY Alarm system-Liquor store 182.50 3424 JOHN FRANC Expenses 126.50 3425 JASON GAD . Refund-Rec dept 13.00 3426 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC Equipment repair & parts 29.30 3{ GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPANY Office supplies 112.92 3 .d DANA GIBBS Packet delivery 130.00 3429 GLEN LAKE BAKERY INC. Food-Election judges 29.65 3430 GLIODEN PAINT Paint-Park dept 82.00 3431 MICHAEL GOERTEL Refund-Rec dept 5.00 3432 SARA GOODENOUGH Refund-Rec dept 12.OD 3 3433 SANDRA HENDREN Refund-Rec dept 13.00 E. 3434 HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIRECTOR Equipment rental-tree chipper 6,133.59 1 3435 HENNEPIN CDUNTY Board of prisoners 1,221.00 3436 HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE Expenses-Rec dept 11.00 S 3437 RON HILK Refund-Rec dept 5.00 j 3438 HIRSCH BROTHERS INC. Chimney flushing-Senior Citizens Center 300.00 ' 3439 HOPKINS FIRESTONE DEALER Equipment repair & parts 25.88 ' 3440 HOPKINS PRINT SHOP, INC. Printing-Senior Citizens 13.01 3441 MARGARET JACOBS Refund-Rec dept 13.00 3442 PETER JOAS Refund-Rec dept 13.00; • 3443 JOHNSON-BIGLER CO., INC. Supplies-Park dept 29.00 3444 JEAN JOHNSON Mileage 17.51 3445 ROSEMARY JOHNSON Mileage 50.00 3446 JONATHAN CLINIC Employment exam-Water dept 30.0D1 3447 JANE KALLAL Refund-Rec dept 13.001 3448 CRAIG & RICK KARNITZ Service-Park dept 475.001 3449 KARULF HARDWARE, INC. Paint, ext cord-Bikeway-August invoices 13.0015.371 3450 AYANNA KELLY Refund-Rec dept 3'"`�1 KLEVE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING Repair air conditioner-Public works bldg 30.0O1 KRAEMER'S HOME CENTER August charge-nails-Community service 32.O5! 3453 PAUL KUJAWA Mileage D 3454 ROBERT LAMBERT Expenses 103.251 3455 LANDCO EQUIPMENT, INC. Equipment repair & parts-Community service 27.6ii 3456 M.E. LANE, INC. Insurance 19,789.001 N r a i i Page four 1 October 7, 1980 3457 LANG, PAULY & GREGERSON, LTD. Legal service $ 8,399.00 3458 JULIE (ARSON Refund-Rec dept 8.00 3459 LIMNOLOGICAL RESEARCH CENTER Service-Round Lake 250.00 3460 LOGIS Service 1,254.76 3461 RICHARD LOOSE Refund-Rec dept 1D.00 3462 KEVIN MAHER Refund-Rec dept • 5.00 1 3463 MANAGEMENT LEARNING LABORATORIES Subscription-Park dept 24.00 3464 ROBERT N. MARTZ Expense 105.50 3465 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIPMENT Oxygen-Fire dept 15.29 1 3466 MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION Dues-Liquor store 20.00 3467 METRO FONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Service 59.00 1 3468 METRO PRINTING INC. Happenings & voter registration sheets 926.00 I 3469 METROPOLITAN FIRE EQUIPMENT CO. Annual inspection of fire extinguishers 208.00 3470 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL August SAC charges 24,403.50 1 3471 MICRO'WEST TERMINAL SYSTEMS Computer equipment-Assessing dept 3,512.57 3472 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION Blacktop - 2,890.27 • 3473 MILLER/DAVIS COMPANY Votomatic election sets 30.60 3474 LYNN MILLER Refund-Rec dept 13.00 3475 MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE CO. - Employment ad-Police dept 127.44 317G MINNESOTA BEARING CDMP.ANY Bearings-Park dept 12.67 1 3‘. MINNESOTA BUSINESS FORMS Imprinted invoices-Financial dept 108.70 f 3478 MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY Service 334.23 E 3479 MINNESOTA TRANSIT LINES, INC. Bus service-Senior Citizens Center 80.00 3480 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP Service 23.60 3481 R.E. MOONEY & ASSOC., INC. Paint-Water dept 139.00 1 3482 MUNICIPAL & PRIVATE SERVICES, INC. Service 1,235.00 f 3483 NORTH STAR WATERWORKS PRODUCTS Hydrant repair kit-Water dept 53.16 3484 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY Service 10,362.92 3485 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY Service 6.19 3486 NORTHLAND ELECTRIC SUPPLY CD. Electric switches-Water dept 76.20 3487 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE Service 357.55 3488 JAN OLSON Refund-Rec dept 8.00 3489 PENNY'S SUPERMARKET #25 Supplies-City Hall, Election supplies 336.51 3490 PERBIX, HARVEY, SIMONS & THORFINNSON Legal service 87.00 3491 CLAYTON PERRON Refund-Rec dept 24.00 3492 PETTY CASH-PUBLIC SAFETY Postage & coffee-Police dept 22.36 3493 CINDY PLANTE Refund-Rec dept 15.00 3494 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN Repair chain saw-Police dept 6.00 3495 RAPID COPY, INCORPORATED Liquor ID cards 37.00 3496 RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF AMERICA Subscription-Water dept 36.00 3497 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOCIATES Service-Valley View Road, Rymarland Camp 4,823.56 2nd addition 3498 ROBERTS DRUG Supplies-Rec dept 13.36 3499 CONNIE SANER Refund-Rec dept 13.00 3`:'fl THELMA SCIJNEIDEWENT Refund-Rec dept 12.00 3_ , SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. Service-Chatham Wood 2,749.41 3502 SCHONSTEDT INSTRUMENT CO. Repair magnetic locator-Park dept 53.10 3503 J.L. SHILLY COMPANY Supplies-Park dept 617.06 3504 RUSSELL SMITH ASSOCIATES, INC. Service-Flying Cloud Drive & Schooner Blvd 650.00 .2L1,3L Page five 0( 5er 7, 1980 3505 JODI SNYDER Refund-Rec dept - 13.00 3506 D'ANN STEVENSON Refund-Rec dept 13.D0 3507 SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING INC. Service-Cardinal Creek 340.19 3508 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CO. Splash guards, oil for squad car• 62.76 3509 SULLIVANS SERVICES, INC. Pump tank-Research Road 50.00 3510 STEPHEN SULLIVAN Mileage 80.37 3511 MARK SWEAZY Mileage 40.00 3512 SYSTEMS 3, INC. Equipment repair & parts 48.75 3513 G.B. THOMSPON Refund-Water & Sewer Bill 26.80 3514 CARRIE TIETZ Minutes-Park & Rec dept 48.00 3515 TOWNS EDGE FORD, INC. Equipment repair & parts 355.35 3516 TWIN CITY SEED CO. Grass seed-Flying Cloud fields 5,140.00 3517 ROGER ULSTAD Expenses 100.00 3518 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Supplies & helmet-Police dept 38.55 ` 3519 URBAN UNIT Refund-Utility bill 8.00 3520 VAN WATERS & ROGERS Chlorine-Water dept 258.80 3521 VERMEER SALES & SERVICE Wire baskets & burlap-Community service 138.70 3522 VOSS ELECTRIC CO. Light bulbs-Fire building 21.14 3523 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment repair & parts-Sewer dept 41.10 - 15.29 Expenses-Police dept 3524 KEITH WALL p P ` 3525 WARNER INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES, INC. Wood preservative-Park dept 564.0868 08 3526 BECKI WARNER Mileage 3527 WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY - Pipe-Bikeway, Gasket, curb box-Water de . 432.56 3 WHOLESALE LIGHTING, INC. Light bulbs-Water dept 207.45 351,9 SALLIE WILLETT Refund-Rec dept 13.0.0 1 3530 XEROX CDRPORATION Service 1,134.25 3531 ZIEGLER INC. Equipment repair & parts 185.11 3532 MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. Book-Finance dept 25.00 3533 ARMOR LOCK & SAFE CO. Service-Senior Citizens Center 82.50 t 3534 SANDRA STEPHENS Instructor-Senior Citizens Center 32.00 3535 G.A. HOFF PLUMBING Install dishwasher-Senior Citizens Center 128.40 3536 ST. REGIS PAPER COMPANY Culverts-Anderson Lakes Trails 477.76 1 i Total $4D1,341.62 1 i CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 80-193 A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING I980 TAX LEVY, COLLECTABLE IN 1981 • BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Eden Prairie, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the following sums of money be levied for the current year, collectable in 1981, upon the taxable property in said City of Eden Prairie for the following purposes: General Fund $1,646,600 Bonds and Interest 1968 Park & Building Bonds 94,000 Transportation Bonds 50,000 Certificate of Indebtedness 210,000 1977 Fire Bonds 73,000 198D Park Bonds 227,000 Fire Relief 70,000 $2,370,600 Funds have been provided for principle and interest payments on all bond issues except as shoran above and no other levies are re— quired. The City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Adnrkted this 7th day of October, 19"0. iol a g H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: ,lehn D. Crane, Clerk • 1981 EDEN PRAIRIE BUDGET ( ASSESSED VALUATIONS, TAX LEVIES AND MILL RATES (Sfiovm by year of tax collectibillity) ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RECOMMEND 1978 1979 _1980 1981 Assessed Valuations ° Real Property 85,384,840 98,028,444 114,939,123 Personal Property 3,563,496 4,029,143 4,449,722 Gross 88,948,336 102,057,587 119,388,84E Fiscal Disp. Contrib. (7,496,265) (8,999,890) (10,941,420) Fiscal Disp. Distrib. 563,826 937,432 1,381,319 I Net Valuation 82,015,897 93,995,129 109,828,744 140,000,000 1 Tax s 1 • General 1,109,770 1,094,071 1,462,000 1,646,600 Fire Relief 1,898 70,000 1968 G. D. Bonds B9,884 72,004 72,000 94,000 Certificates 61,920 150,009 150,000 210,000 Fire Bonds 59,923 94,006 91,000 73,000 Utility Bonds 79,897 . 1980 Park 8onds 227,000 Transportation Bonds _ 102,806 50,000 50,000 Total 1,403,292 1,512,896 1,825,000 2,370,600 I Mill Rate General 13.531 11.640 13.312 11.763 763 Fire Relief .023 1968 G. 0. Bonds 1.096 .766 .656 .671 Certificates .755 1;596 1.366 1.500 . Fire Bonds .731 1.000 .829 .521 Utility Bonds .974 1980 Park Bonds 1.621 Transportation Bonds 1.104 . .454 .357 Total 17.110 16.106 16.617 16.933 1 244 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ' . HENNEPIN, MINNESOTA 1981 BUDGET GENERAL FUND REVENUES • ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET REQUESTED ADOPTED 1973 1979 1980 1981 1981 GENERAL FUND GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES Current 1,303,700 1,646,600 Less; Allowance for Delinquent 50,000 50,000 - Net: 948,530 939,306 1,253,700 1,596,600 Delinquent Taxes 44,958 91.703 40,000 40,000 • Penalty & Lnterest 65,874 220,908 50,000 50,000 Total Taxes 1,059,362 1,251,917 1,343,700 1,686,600 REVENUE FRDM OTHER AGENCIES Local Government Aid 202,246 333,833 387,200 417,200 State Aid Street 11,430 11,655 11,600 . 11,600 Police Pension 29,863 34,539 35,000 37,000 Fixed Machinery Replacement 2,779 2,614 1,400 1,400 • Homestead Credit 132,027 152,088 158,300 Other 1,695 8,820 Total Other Agencies 380,040 543,549 593,500 467,200 LICENSES Liquor & Beer 20,128 11,147 20,000 20,000 Building Contractors 4,559 6,290 5,000 5,000 . Food _ 5,171 15,203 10,000 15,000 Other 4,099 5,683 4,000 5,000 _ Total Licenses 33,967 38,323 39,000 45,000 PERMITS AND FEES Dog Registration 3,451 3,843 4,000 4,000 Building 238,225 284,912 200,000 255,000 Plumbing & Heating 88,462 104,145 60,000 70,000 Other Building 1,135 1,200 1,20D • Planning & Zoning- 24,569 23,275 16,000 17,400 Engineering & Admin 226,676 202,195 340,000 340,000 Other Fees 3,435 1,428 3,500 1,600 Impound Fees 686 860 800 1,200 Total Permits & Fees _585,504 621,793 625,800 690,400 * Included as part of tax levy 2.11.1 1981 Budget Page 2 ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET REQUESTED ADOPTED 1978 1979 1980 1981 1981 (. RECREATIONS FEES Special Events 1,909 2,462 2,800 3,200 Playgrounds 1,554 3,049 5,500 4,000 Swimming & Admissions 4,778 5,471 8,500 500 • Skilled Development 18,549 16,101 22,000 24,200 Rentals 4,753 2,279 4,200 2,700 Concessions 3,172 3,872 3,800 2,700 Organized Athletics 11,038 . 15,562 20,100 26,500 Teen Activities 392 260 800 1,000 Human Services 2,400 2,000 . Other 5,425 27 -0- 4,ODO Total Recreation Fees 51,570 49,084 70,100 70,800 COURT FINES 40,403 56,252 40,000 60,000. INVESTMENT EARNINGS 15,402 47,903 _15,000_ 40,000 TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS Federal Revenue Sharing 68,048 92,605 130,000 130,000 Utility Operating 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Fund Balance 149,000 190,000 Encumbrances 85,000 20,000 Total from Other Funds 78,048 102,605 374,000 350,100 _ OTHER REVENUE School Liasion 12,746 14,413 14,500 15,000 Miscellaneous 39,541 62,146 _ 10,000 20,000 Total Other 52,287 76,559 24,500 35,000 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2,296,583 2,787,985 3,125,600 3,445,100 { 1981 EDEN PRAIRIE BUDGET GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES ADOPTED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET DEPT. MGR. BY COUNCIL 1978 1979 1980 REQUEST RECOMMEND 1981 GENERAL FUND Mayor and Council 13,200 13,200 13,200 13,200 13,200 City Manager 50,079 52,022 56,300 56,200 56,200 Public Information 5,904 8,214 9,000 9,000 9,000 • Corporation Council 58,073 46,994 42,000 47,000 47,000 Public Health 3,812 -0- Finance 44,139 45,323 64,800 64,900 64,900 Elections 4,752 3,447 6,800 1,000 1,000 General Services 24,151 35,382 29,500 32,200 32,200 Logis 13,000 15,504 20,000 21,000 21,000 Employee Benefits 210,189 212,160 345,500 350,500 350,500 Shared Services 113,859 113,446 127,300 130,500 130,500 City Hall 11,840 23,425 24,500 27,700 27,700 Engineering 104,451 143,165 218,500 345,400 220,400 Inspections 92,534 111,212 128,800 129,100 129,100 Real Property Assessing 57,904 80,987 100,500 110,400 110,400 Public Safety Police 380,533 477,031 562,500 589,100 577,100 Fire 60,908 86,902 86,200 99,800 103,800 Civil Defense 4,456 3,107 2,700 1,900 1,900 Animal Control 8,829 1D,029 12,000 14,400 14,400 Prosecution 23,782 23,873 22,000 22,000 22,000 Public Works Street Maintenance 92,932 111,426 236,000 354,000 237,20D Snow and Ice Control 32,540 40,193 64,400 69,700 69,700 Traffic and Street Sign 12,703 6,635 17,200 19,300 19,300 Drainage Control 19,986 22,583 -25,000 23,700 23,700 Street Lighting 20,723 24,383 44,000 60,000 60,000 Equipment Maintenance 100,031 122,690 . Fire & Public Works Bldg 11,055 18,335 35,700 40,500 39,200 Park Maintenance 115,122 128,582 116,500 152,200 136,2D0 Community Services Administration 33,763 43,784 42,600 42,900 42,900 Park Planning 10,720 10,372 20,000 20,000 20,000 Recreation • Program Supervisor 20,209 19,121 27,000 25,600 25,600 Special Events 2,581 2,020 6,000 6,600 6,600 PlaYgrounds 14,612 18,724 24,000 31,100 31,100 Beach Operations 24,240 26,232 40,600 27,400 27,400• 1. Skilled Development 15,413 13,183 19,500 21,500 21,500 Skating 5,796 9,617 14,800 18,700 18,700 Teen Activities 10,534 8,763 20,400 20,600 20,600 Organized Athletics 8,787 12,061 18,200 27,600 27,600 Concessions 3,731 4,712 7,400 4,600 4,600 Community Education 5,392 5,900 6,300 6,300 Other 9,900 -0- Human Services General -0- 23,376 13,900 13,700 13,700 Senior Center -0- 9,300 10,400 10,400 Adaptive Recreation -0- 3,300 4,000 4,000 Planning 42,326 49,167 56,500 70,200 56,800 zy►t5 General Fund Expenditures - 1981 Budget • Page two ' ADOPTED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET DEPT. MGR. BY COUNCIL 1978 . 1979 1980 REQUEST RECOMMEND 1981 GENERAL FUND Guide Plan 16,000 12,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 In Service Training 17,605 16,464. 17,D00 17,000 17,000 Reserve 3,850 723 69,700 200,000 200,000 Capital Outlay Parks -0- 91,773 1,80D 8,400 8,400 Tree Disease 177,000 123;300 100,500 107,800 107,800 Historical Cultural -0- 1,832 8,000 11,500 11,500 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $2,113,946. $2,467,474 $3,125,600 $3,725,600 $3,445,100 • • • • • Xytal • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Sandy Werts, Recreation Supervisor Rae Uly, Human Services Coordinator DATE: September 19, 1980 SUBJECT: Clarification on Budget Items At the Tuesday, September 16 meeting additional information was requested on three budget categories. Special events progr. .ing is incl,ded in programs set up by Sandy Werts, Recreation Super: •r. Historical/Cultural programs are those programs sponsored by the Hist..• ical/Cultural Commission and Adaptive Recreation programs are planned by Human Services Coordinator, Ray Biy. Special Events Special events programming includes the Summer Community Band, with the expansion to year round ensambles; winter holiday programs and school vacation programs including Sno Daze in the parks, snow tubing, trips to Omni Theatre and holiday theatre trips. Other programs include open gyms, community gardens, ski trips - adult, youth, special trips such as the Christmas Idea House tour. Also, for 1980 the Kids Korner program for pre-schoolers is included for the fall, winter and spring sessions. For many of the activities and events listed the costs are covered by fees. However, these costs are still reflected in the budget. The City usually covers part of the transportation costs and the costs for chaperones and leadership. Historical/Cultural Programs Music Entertainment - concerts such as Riverboat Ramblers, Duane Hulbert, Layton James, harpsichoid'ist planned for January. Music Education - Young Audiences Concert, Masters Series or other programs through St. Paul Chamber Orchestra for school students. Drama Entertainmennt - melodrama and other plays Drama Education - Creative Dramatics School Dance Entertainment - Ballet or Modern Dance performance Historical Emphasis Program - Sun Bonnet Days Fine Arts Program - Art in City Hall • The Commission has also budgeted for purchasing some equipment for record keeping and the beginnings of resource library. Some revenue is projected for events such as a harpsichord concert and another music and dance entertainment programs and the Drama School. • Adaptive Recreation Since January of 1980, adaptive recreation programs have been developed and offered cooperatively with 1200 on the AVENUE (the West Hennepin Community Center for mentally handicapped citizens) and six other West Hennepin communities. By having each community offer one program and open registration to residents from all the communities, consumers can choose the program best meeting their age • and ability level requirements. Plans are to offer four six to eight week/session programs, one each season. Staffing requirements for this population are usually 1 to 4 (that is, no more than four participants for each staff person). Past programs have included cross country ski lessons and a summer outdoor education/recreation program held at Hennepin County Park Reserves. Some revenue is projected from registration fee, but these fees are set low due to the limited financial resources of the majority of participants. SW/RB:md To: Mayor and Council From: John Frane Date: October 3, 1980 Re: 1981 Budget The request in the certificate section is to equip the three door openers at the main fire station with remote control units. It is anticipated that the saving in energy cost will exceed the costs of the units. • 2I • 1980 Park Bond Fund Receipts and Disbursements Estimated Budget 9/30/80 RECEIPTS Bond Proceeds $3,500,000 Estimated Donations 35,DD0 Estimated Interest Earnings 350,000 *Temporary transfer from Cash Park Fees 260,000 Tax Levies (1982 thru 1986) 415,000 Total 47560,000 DISBURSEMENTS Community Center Construction $2,633,000 Architect 163,000 Building Equipment 54,000 Total $2,850,000 Park acquisition 300,000 Park Development 1980 program $ 170,000 1981 program 370,000 1982 program 340,000 1983 program 70,D00 Total 950,000 Transfer to Debt Service Fund 200,000 *Repayment of Cash Park Fee transfers (84 thru 86) 260,000 $4,56D,000 j *The actual amount may vary if the time of expenditures differs with the current estimate of timing. S . Cash Park Fees Receipts and Disbursements September 30, 1980 RECEIPTS Cash Balance 1/1/80 $441,131 1980 Collections thru September 157,541 TOTAL $598,672 • DISBURSEMENTS 1980 thru September 32,851 Encumbrances Payable Grants Miller Park 1980 $147,400 ($112,500) 34,900 ( Miller Park 1981 139,600 ( 86,800) 52,800 Miller Park 1982 31,800 31,800 Creek Knolls 1980 5,00D TOTAL 157,351 $441,321 Difference Less Estimated transfer to 1980 Park Bond Fund (260,000) Unencumbered Balance at 9/30/80 $181,321 zq51 4,- s f 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission TI1RU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services n, / ' DATE: October 2, 1980 SUBJECT: Red Rock Park Alternate Sites The City Council has discussed the delay in acquisiton of Red Rock Park at the August 5 and September 16 Council meetings. At both of these 1 meetings, staff indicated that Mr. Seifert was not willing to negotiate for the sale of his property adjacent to Mitchell Road until he had finalized the sale of the Pheasant Oaks site. The City Council then directed staff to look at alternate park sites in the area. 1 Since the September 16 meeting, staff has met with the Carmody's, owners of the property identified as the "Deer Creek Proposal", recently submitted to the City Council. This property is directly across Mitchell Road from the Seifert property. Staff has identified approximatley 16.5 acres of that site that could be developed satisfactorily and serve as the neighorborhood park for the Red Rock area. A copy of a sketch plan is attached. The Carmody's have indicated that they are interested in negotiating with the City for the sale of this property for park purposes if the City wishes to pursue this proposal. On October 1, 1980, staff again met with Mr. Seifert to check on the status I of his property. Mr. Seifert has still been unable to close on the Pheasant Oaks site and; therefore, does not wish to commit to the sale of the designated park properly at this time. The Carmody site has been approved for density of 2.5 units per acre. Therefore, staff would anticipate that the Carmody property might prove to be very expensive for park acquisition. However, staff does recommend that the Council authorize an appraisal of the Carmody property and does believe the City should consider negotiating for the acquisiton of this parcel if it can be obtained at a reasonable price. BL:md 2 c1 • 1 . I 1 . I „.',::.' (------"/ 1 1 1".."...... \ . . • . . , . . . .4' C i r\cl 1 * i4 I) a7F.11 11-- C / . ' ,; t-[1 0‘, C1-.1.1. li S- —— .... ,.‘ ,.. -e,;„.--v-,;-- 1 1')\ 1 1c1 4 ty c IT:- .., ....• 4: a 1C ...-- --- ,4,1,'''' _-..... -......4 / \ ..1 ---- . - 4,• rip it / - - VI. 4.--/.-"... . . ---__ ., lit' ' 11 .. ' .1 . 171 7': .-:." ,rml.a,.__.'",›lk.‘ ... .....- 11 '''' ----- CA . ‘1: 1---I II ) 5.(4+4 1/, C..) mt..‘ i--, 11 (:.1) ... , 4. li ,)<> --:".'._ i_____ kh. 1 .5 ooa--- ii \.-o — ti .,t. , vo ivs ,,3.... 0 11 i —1;---E. , — '‘...) 11 11 csD, ______ il ri it 0 • 5 , l -.1 # A ;"•,..'1 . 11 ftiiei:::,3ii gr.,,,.,...,,, 04 R ).. w„, 1 / 1 I _f:. •1,J. .::1 .. -- -_c.1\11/4)}1. 1.1-2s11•7.1-11,4 . _ _... ....•—._ .. 6, L16.5 .:-• :. - . . _..- . MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council 711RU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager �—�"� FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services �( V—' DATE: October 1, 1950 SUBJECT: Riley Lake Park At the July 7, 1980 Commission meeting, chairman Anderson requested staff to put Riley Lake Park on the next agenda so the Commission could discuss the pros and cons of the Swedlund property vs the Schaitberger property and Riley Lake Park as a community parks vs a regional park. On July 29, staff prepared a memorandum out ling the background of City action regarding Riley Lake Park and addressing the pros and cons of Riley Lake Park as a community park vs a regional park and the Swedlund property vs the Schaitberger property. That memorandum is attached. On September 15, 1980, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission discussed the pros and cons of Riley Lake Park as a regional park or a community park and took the following action: 1. The City Council pursue steps to change Riley Lake Park from a community park to a regional park as per the 1975 regional park plan. 2. Recommended that the Council amend the 1979 Guide Plan to conform with the first action. 3. Recommend that the City Council request the Hennepin County Park Reserve District and the Metropolitan Council to purchase the Swedlund property as a first phase for this regional park. • 4. Continue any action on the Riley Lake Estates development proposal until such time as the City has reaction from Hennepin County Park Reserve District and the Metropolitan Council regarding their willingness to purchase the Swedlund property for regional park purposes. 11he Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource-.; Commission then requested the City staff to forward these requests to the City Ceuncil for review at the October 7, 1980 meeting. 2U5y -2- ( Staff recommends that if the Council wishes to consider a change in the status of Ricly Lake from a Community Park to a Regional Park, or to discuss expanding the present boundaries of Ri.ely Lake it should hold a public hearing on October 21, 1980 so that affected property owners can be notified. BL:md • • � c � 2455 i s Rinuten - Parks, Recreation &.. unapproved September 15, 1980 ?- Natural Resources Commission - site is not as good as at Braemar which might produce cone limitations but this will be explored further through the study. Lambert expressed strong agreement with this study as it will eliminate the guesswork on how best to develop the property. His major concern is that if the determined use lowers the floodplain, then tho "bounce" which would occur would have a detrimental effect on Starring lake including the senior citizen center. Lambert roco.-.'ads approval of the study but requests the Watershed District explore the effects of lowering the floodplain. Brauer said a 4 foot "bounce" (lowering of floodplain) is not manageable and that 18" is a maximum manageable adjustment. MOTION: VanMeter moved to recommend. to the Council approval of the PurgatoryAkLjor Center Open Space Study and adds that par Staff recommendation, the City petition the Watershed District to study the downstream affects if the water table is lowered. Ercitcnstein seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. A 10 minutes recess was taken at this time. B. Pro's and Con's of Riley Lake as a Regional Park or Community Park ( cent. from August 4 and August 10) Lambert referred to Staff Nemo of July 29, 1980, giving the background of where the City has been on this issue. Lambert said if the decision is to make Riley Lake a regional park, the Swedlund property and east shore should be included. If the decision is to remain a community park, a decision needs to be made which of the areas, Swedlund or Schaitbergor, will the park include. Lambert said the Commission agreed in the past not to ;;et involved in regional park business anymore. He also added that the present Council does not believe Riley Lake Park should be a regional park. He also reflected on the fact this Commission agreed to try to buy the Swedlund property earlier this year, so there are several issues in this matter. Tangen mentioned that if the Riley lake properties become a regional park, there would be no Buie fields. Ho said if the City lost the one existing game field in that sector we would have to look at another site to meet community needs. Lambert said he wouldn't be too concerned about acquiring 10 acres, clue- where in that sector for a ballfield (perhaps a bluff site at' Rr1"n Prairie does not presently have a community park alongthe bluffs): however, the qu at. n sh0ul: be °Is the RileyLake Park site a good cite fee a regional park?" Ianbert noted that over 150 acres of the 200 acre site is presently farmland - not especially a high quality natural environment. Taegen pointed out that Eden Prairie shares lake boundaries with Chanhassen and the majority of puvplu who use Riley Lake now are non- residents. _,a..., - Pa n`re pnrnan+inn k flnnnnrnvnd Snn+omhon 1r, 1oAn Natural Resources Commission -6- i Anderson said if Riley Lake becomes a regional park with regional funding, Eden Prairie would still have access to it and the park would be an asset to the comet nity. Anderson turned the chair over to George Tangen. kOTIOP: Anderson moved to recommend to the Council that the present Riley Lake Park and the Swedlund property and adjoining shoreline bococ+e a regional park. VanMeter seconded the motion. DISCUSSION: Tangen asked if the Commission is limiting the size of the park by the motion. It was agreed it was limiting. 1t1,E1T F.0 V.OTICii: Tangen said the motion will be amended per staff recommenuation as follows: The Swedlund property and shoreline property south and east, to and including the Schaitberger property, should be a regional park per the 1975 Regional Park Plan. Vanheter seconded the amendment and it carried unanimoulsy. Vote on original motion. Tangcn returns the ohair to Anderson. I;OTIO!: Breitenstein moved to recommend the Council amend the 1979 Guideplan to conform with the above motion. Priederichs seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. 1401l0i4: Breitenstein moved to recommend the Council request the Hennepin County Park Reserve District and the letropoliten Council to purchase the SHedlund property for regional park purposes. Pond seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. Anderson requested Item V.B.1. - Riley Lake Estates be taken off the table. MOTION: Tangen moved to recommend to the Council that in view of past motions, the City indefinitely continue the Riley Lake Estates property until such time as we have word back from the Hennepin County Park Reserve District with regard to their willingmess to purchase for regional park purposes. Johnson seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. DISCUSSIM Tangen noted his reason for not saying denial of Riley Lake Estates is because it should be known first if the properties can 1 be acquired as a regional park. If the regional park plan is rejected, the City will be faced with the Lake Riley Estates proposal again. y 9 Lambert noted it would tako a minimum of two months after the Council makes a request to the Hennepin County Park Reserve District and v:otro j Council before it receives an answer. I z415 ) MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: July 29, 1980 SUBJECT: Riley Lake Park At the July 7, 1980 Commission meeting, chairman Anderson requested staff to put Riley Lake Park on the next agenda so the Commission could discuss the pros and cons of the Swedlund property vs the Schaitberger property, and Riley Lake Park as a community park vs a regional park. Prior to the Commission getting in to a discussion invloving these issues, I feel it important that everyone understand the background of Riley Lake Park; therefore, the first portion of the memo will be to summarize background information on Riley Lake Park that will help Commission members understand why there is a question regarding the location and the status of the park today. BACKGROUND 1. 1968 Guide Plan shows a 60 acre community park at Riley Lake on the Jacques property. ( 2. In 1972, the 14.3 acre wooded peninsula on the north side of Riley Lake was known as the Westminister Heights Camp. The camp was owned by the Presbyterian Synod of Minnesota and listed for sale at $135,000. In the November of 1972, the Chase-Brackett Co. provided the City of Eden Prairie with an appriasal of that site estimating the value at $146,700. 3. In early 1973, Len Swedlund purchased the camp site. 4. In April 1974, Ken Schaitberger contacted the City concerning his desire to sell Dutch's Resort. This lead to a study of the entire Lake Riley/Mitchell Lake area and three options were developed. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Cemm:�-;,,n roc^m!.^.ended a 200 acre option to the City Council (which included the Schaitberger site and the Swedlund site). On June 10, 1975, the City Council approved an option to acquire the Schaitberger property subject to this plan. On June 24, the Council approved the filing of an application for 1976 LAWCON funding to assist in this purchase. The Schaitberger option was approved and signed in July of 1975. S. The application for LAWCON funds was not approved because the Metropolitan Council in reviewing the application said they felt Lake Riley should be included in the Metrpolitan Regional Park System. • • zys E • Riley Lake Park -2- July 29, 1980 6. Consistent with this position, the Metropolitan Council included 1.8 million dollars for the 200 acres at Riley Lake Park in their Five Year Capital Improvement Program. On July 22, 1975, the City Council approved the master plan for Riley Lake and directed staff to forward this plan to the Metropolitan Council for action and funding. 7. On January 13, 1976, the Council expressed it's suppport for the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Five Year Capital Improvement Program including acquisition of Lake Riley Park area. 8. On March 23, 197G, the City Connie.' adopted Resolution #1106 expressing support for legislative action on the metropolitan bonding proposal for the capital improvement program. This legislation was never considered by the 1976 legislative session. 9. In April, 1976, the Riley/Purgatory Creek Watershed District was approached for assistance in purchasing the Schaitberger property. They did agree to pay 50% of the pruchase price under a loan agreement to be repayed if/and when metropolitan funding became available for this parcel. 10. On May 25, 1976, the City Council voted to reconsider the Lake Riley plan - stating an intent to provide a City park with Lake Riley access for the use and convenience primarily to the southwestern population of the City of Eden Prairie, while at the same time approving in principal a cooperative agreement with the Watershed District for the purchase. 11. In July of 1976, the City entered into a contract for deed with Mrs. Schaitherger for a 9 acre community park. 12. On September 7, 1976, the City Council voted to submit items to the Metro- politan Council inclusion in their capital improvement program being revised for possible legislative action in 1977. These included Anderson Lakes and Bryant Lake. Lake Riley was listed on the proposal with a foot note concerning the reconsideration action taken in June. 13. The revised Metro CIP includes all of the items Anderson, Bryant and Riely Lake just as they were included in the original Capital Improvement Program decelopmed in 1975. 1 14. Eden Prairie's options at that time were: 1. Support the 200 acre plan with Eden Prairie as the implementing agency. 2. Support the 200 acre plan with some other implementing agency responsible (Hennepin County Park,Reserve District). 3. Request that Lake Riley be dropped from the Metro CIP entirely. • 15. On December 14, the City passed Resolution 111227 regarding Lake Riley Park requesting "that Lake Riley be designated in the Metropolitan Regional Park System as a community park with the understanding that the City will acquire the land. This is done recognizing the possibility of federal lalhC0N or other partial funding may exist pending further planning application and review." 2gSa y S' I 1 r g f Lake Riley Park -3- July 29, 1980 4' 16. On December 14, 1976, the City Council also passed Resolution 111229 with respect to the Metropolitan Councils Five Year Capital Improvement Program for parks. That resolution supported the Metropolitan Councils Five Year Capital Improvement Program relative to the Anderson Lakes Park and Bryant Lake Park within the City of Eden Prairie, and does commit itself to the implementation of these parks under their financing plan as per the master plan of these sites. • x 17. Upon acquisition of the Scahitberger property at Riley Lake, the City began operating a community park which included a swimming beach, boat i launching facility, small picnic area and softball field. 1S. In 1979, the City updated the Comprehensive Guide Plan and at the same time Co.,.t....h� Park Planaddendumto the Guide Plan. In I adopted a �r�.,..,, .... as a.^. reference to Riley Lake Park, the Comprehensive Park Plan states the following:"This park will be expanded to include a total of approximately 50 acres and will be developed to include both active and passive areas. The park will be connected to a lineal park connecting Riley Lake to the Minnesota River from the south, Rice Marsh Lake to the north and to Miller Park on Mitchell Lake to the northeast." 19. In early January of 1980, Len Swedlund informed staff that he would soon i be putting this property on the market for sale. lie asked if the City( I had any interest purchasing the property for park purposes. On February i 4, 1980, this information was discussed with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. This item was also discussed at the 1 4 February 19 and March 4 City Council meetings. At the March 4 City Council, the Council instructed staff to get appraisals on the Dutch's Resort and 1 the Swedlund property, and to provide information on funds that might be available for acuqisition and development of the Swedlund property. 1 20. Appraisal were completed on both parcels and presented to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission on April 21, 1980. Appraisal for the Swedlund property was $324,500. Appraisal for the Schhitberger f property was $125,000. a 21. At the May 5 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission meeting, the Commission toured the Swedlund Property and the Schaitbergcr property, and staff provided a schematic plan for the development of the Swedlund property into a community park. At the May 5 meeting, the Commission moved to recommend to the Council purchasing the Swedlund property to include a 200x30' parcel in Carver County if possible. It was also recommended to continue use of the Scahitberger property as a public boat access to Riley Lake. 22. At the May 20 meeting of the City Council, staff recommended the City Council table the decision on the Swedlund property acquisition until there is more definite information on LANCON funding assistance for Miller Park on Mitchell Lake. The City Council tabled the Swedlund property indefinitely. 1 ✓ jt 1 .,.ter s . i.„,,t,„:•• .".....„, A.,..„ . i ... .,...„,„:„.„,, . ,, . • • ,„ / , • ,,,, , ei• : .... v,„•rainri:ia vki + p vi 1/° ,.„ 3 `�•. wnr�n o---- � ��. .,rll' �.J 1 ./ 3.4nf,:,:i1:1 1 r. J , d'"'� i.;� I.r_ 1 ' t1-1 .....,V "N"4"-.`..; f'rt.,f.:1:\.1i,Atti.f.S, i 47..47 1 k) ' ii ,Yajl?1(rvajaJ( b f ,aTOs tiliN; �• ele Ysir p • /7 ' ,`' N,el Gaek ' y • O • J. . . 24G1 • 5 s . r . f i o.ill"' I i• .. i • JJ s�cr r ,- • i ,S ii - 1 1-,-r � J I, .,,,sr. :eWCj1l� ! .n . f S iN j ti i. t ` o4q • I. i e/ l O j i : P �nr1f h*St t�i 9$ `a�( 1 - Kirtland.5acros :c;' terKi 1S.7ac es f 1 :� 1 IR Sch3if tt r;`9,0.7�:re3 11L { T. ►.IJ •�" • n . ,, ,_z• ,.ieliIa�^© ;rP5 . T• :7.4--..1�'.�-15XICS .. - I. o t a r`:',. - !. ' k. I ' .- %yCLct :;11ii- 1 Lake Riley Park 6- July 29, 1980 COMMUNITY PARK vs. RPGIONAL PARK In discussing the pros and cons of Riley Lake Park as a community park vs a regional park several items should be considered: 1. Definition of a community park. 2. Definition of a regional park. 3. Who will the park serve and who does the park servo now? COAE4UNITY PARKS arc defined as an area of natural or ornamental quality for nature oriented outdoor recreation activities such as picnicking, boating, fishing, swimming and field games. A community park serves 3 to 5 neighborhoods and is usually 25-50 acres in size. REGIOANL PARKS are defined as an area of natural or ornamental quality for nature oriented outdoor recreation such as picnicking, boating, fishing, swimming,skiing, hiking and camping. A regional park serves 3 to 5 communities and is usually 200-500 acres in size. To a great extent, the manner in which Riley Lake Park is developed will determine who the park will serve. Approximately 100 acres of the original 200 acre site • is presently under cultivation, and is shown on the 1975 master plan as conununity playfields and limited game fields space. The-definition of a regional park does not include game fields and certainly not community playfields. Although, these existing agriculture fields could be turned back into grass lands and a reforestation program started. It doesn't seem to make a great deal of sense to spend regional park dollars on property that has such limited natural amenities. The only "natural amenities" of the original 200 acre land are the Swedlund property and the lakeshore between Riley Lake Road and the shoreline with a limited wooded area adjacent to Riley Creek and the small pond and wooded area on the eastern boundary of the park. Although, it is tempting to reconunend this parcel for acquisition as a regional park because of the accessibility of regional park acquisition funding, Community Services staff does not feel that this site warrants regional park recognition. City staff feels that in recognizing Riley Lake as one of the prime fishing lakes in the City and a popular lake for water skiing and swimming, the City should attempt to provide adequate public access for boat launching and sriruning, and to preserve any significant natural amentities in this area. City staff also believes that the cast shore of Riley Lake is a prime location for a community park serving the southwest protion of Eden Prairie. This park that could be linked to Miller Park and Rice Marsh Lake through a linear park system following a series of ponds between these lakes and could represent one of the highlights of the Eden Prairie Park system. It is obvious that the boat launching facility will serve more than Eden Prairie residents, as do all of the other boat launching facilities in the City. However, a 50 acre community park could still preserve the significant natural resources along the eastern shore and provide community playfields that will be needed in the future to serve this area of the City. Lake Riley Park -y- July 29, 1980 SWEI)I.UNI) PROPERTY vs SCHAliTERCER PROPERTY The following is a list of some of the pros and cons regarding acquisition of the either a community park at the Swedlund site or adding to the Schaitberger site: Swedlund Properll Pros 1. The Swedlund property is a high wooded hill with a beautiful view and is the most prominent natural feature on the lake. 2. The site is ideal for picnics, especially for group use. 3. It has an adequate swimming beach. 4. It would be a real plus to have these types of facilities (large group use building on a lake) in a park system for group use, day camps, etc. Swedlund Prone y Cons 1. There is not an adequate boat launch facility at the Swedlund property without additional acquisition. 2. The property is expensive to purchase due to all of the buildings on this site. { Schaitber�r Site Pros 1. The 9 acre site is a good start for a community park that eventually could link to the Swedlund property. 2. The site has excellent potential for boat launching, swimming beach, picnic area and community park game fields. 3. It may be too early in the development of the Eden Prairie Park System for the City to make full use of the facilities due to the size and location of the park, and to justify the cost of maintaining them. Schaitberger Site Cons 1. The location of Riley Lake Road makes the site a very poor site for boat launching and swimming and divides the boat launching and swimming from the picnic area. This will continue to be a hazard until the road is realigned. 2. The site would have to be doubled in size to the north in the near future to make realignment of the road feasible. If this happened, the City could develop a very satisfactory picnic area, boat launching and swimming facility at this time and could develop community park hallfields, etc. in the future when they arc needed. The attached schematic plans show various possibilities for acquisition and development of the community park at Riley Lake. ilL:md aqt,4 • . . . I N\ ti s.........h"..„,. )., .. _.----..----. _ ./... • \ S g 0 si 0 Or.a I it------1 !.4'‘t ...f,..-,••1.., ••••••••/N,, ‘•1•,,,. I or4N) K\• \) 4 1 s ,r• ',.3,-":-',,, ,... • 1 4 a \„)...„..... ...• z E 1 . • I . II) ‘11 , . a . . • I . 1 , • . 6 n, ..'s• • -..., ,,, . I . 1 .. . .. . , i . •,..:.. . , .. . •›- l ( . . • . . ..., . ) t; , ! d ot . . , < ... •/ ti. IC • . 41.• . • 41 • -A CZ I • c• . . . 1 ...t' 4/• • fl ..C:-.)... ' - I 211(f) .. . . , ...• ,.. -. '• - • MEMO • TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: October 2, 1980 SUBJECT: Agreement With Bloomington for Storm Sewer Outfall on Riverview Road As a follow-up to my memo on September 12, 1980, regarding this matter, attached is a copy of the general drainage pattern map taken from the City's Comprehensive Drainage Plan, as prepared by Barr Engineering Co. in 1970. The map shows those portions of Eden Prairie which are now draining or will eventually drain, into the Bloomington storm sewer system and then back into Eden Prairie via the proposed Riverview Road storm sewer outlet pipe. The size of this outlet pipe has been reduced from 72" to 27" because of the extensive ponding areas which have been provided by Bloomington, thus reducing the project costs considerable. The most immediate benefits to Eden Prairie from this project will be to help eliminate the serious erosion problems occurring along the drainage ditch parallelling the south side of Riverview Road. Trees have fallen into the ditch and portions of the edge of Riverview Road have washed into the ditch. The proposed storm sewer will intercept • all the drainage east of Co. Rd. 18 which now enters this ditch and contributes to the erosion problem. The street will also be resurfaced between Co. Rd. 18 and Purgatory Creek, thus reducing our maintenance costs. In the future, as Eden Prairie develops, it will be necessary to connect the 34 acre-foot ponding area located just south of Co. Rd. 1 and west of Co. Rd. 18 into the Bloomington system. Without the River- view Road outfall this connection would probably be denied by Blooming- ton. Bloomington has now received bids on this project and the estimated City's share has been revised downward from $44,000 to $40,000. We are proposing • that this cost be paid by the City to the General Fund because this project • will be part of the City's overall trunk storm sewer system which, when completed, will be a benefit to the entire community. For future City budgets we will be recommending a general mill levy to cover such storm scwer costs. In the event that at some time in the future the City may decide to specially assess all or a portion of of the cost of this or • similar projects to specific drainage areas, we could do so pursuant to MSA 429.051. Recommend that the City Council authorize the Mayor and Manager to sign the "Agreement for Construction and Maintenance of Storm Sewer Serving Areas in the Cities of Eden Prairie and Bloomington." Copies of this agreement were included in the September 16th Council packets. 2LIiL i ..' "...... s:\ I '' +• �/ mil � �f- � - ; / /— � J - .,. -- -- —'` , • • �•C r� �.-4 .,, 1 /—) e 1 I ' . �� Acd�ison . .— .,.A... \ I `.�7, ..crr.st � C - !—.. ...,.. -t 41 ir, cl4` a•r Lakeroy I 1 /N\ 1\ } iY r to% I• `'�L`/ \ 24 ./ ! \� 1 ` L / 1 1,.......)1 \ ,\I I r'f S:arino / e I i _ )Th<N\N„. ?' ' r !Ma1 \._,..__.t. _........ 1 �F-. �.� — ,a� �r�—mil ``ter�`. Y\\ _ ,,. •r z .. L') I.a ke ) • I. • \'�I 1 • 1 GENERAL • 1. )RAINAGE PATTERN 241 • MEMO TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger UJstad,.City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer • DATE: October 3, 1980 • SUBJECT: Bids for Lime Sludge Removal Bids will be opened at 10:00 A.M. on Monday, October 6, 1980, for the lime sludge removal contract. We will tabulate the bids received and have a recommendation for the Council on Tuesday evening. • CJJ:kh 4 l • • zgLi October 7; 1980 CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE • f HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. R80-199 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ANO ORDERING ADVER- TISEMENT FOR BIOS (I.C. 51-288) WHEREAS, the City Engineer, through Rieke Carroll Muller, Assoc., has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvement, to wit, I.C. 51-288, Utility improvements and street restoration on Industrial Orive and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEO BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The adver- tisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened at • 10:00 o'clock A.M. on Thursday, Oct. 30, 1980, and con- sidered by the Council at 7:30 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, Nov. 4, 1980, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid. AOOPTEO by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor (ATTEST: SEAL John O. Frane, Clerk • MEMO TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: October 3, 1980 SUBJECT: Water Plant Desic, Status Report Mr. Jim Patton of Black & Veatch Consulting Engineers reports that the design phase of the Water Treatment Plant is proceeding well and he projects that the contract plans and specs will be ready for bidding in February, 1981. In the meantime, we have requested Mr. Patton to give us cost estimates for some additional work which was not part of the original project scope. This addition- al work would include water supply Well No. 6 and collector line along Purga- tory Creek at Valley View Road and one million gallon storage tank to be located in the western part of the City. These additional facilities will provide needed system reliability in case of a large fire during the peak summer demand period, plus higher water pressures for the western part of ( the City during times of peak demand. The estimated cost for the water plant expansion and proposed additional work breaks down as follows: Water supply Wells No. 4 & 5 and collector line _$532,D00 Water Treatment Plant expansion, including $2,677,OD0 1 MG below ground reservoir Water Supply Well No. 6, collector line $339,000 and 16" trunk main connection ( this well to have stand-by natural gas engine drive) 1 MG elevated storage tank $1,029,000 Total project cost, including $4,577,000 10% contingencies & 10% Eng. Say $4,600,000 It is recommended that the Council receive this memo and authorize Black & Veatch Consulting Engineers to proceed with plans and specs for Well No. 6 and the 111G storage tank. CJJ:kh 2(I70 5,. • MEMO { TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the' City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer OATE: October 3, 1980 SUBJECT: Round Lake Park Storm Sewer • At the September 16 meeting the Council asked the engineering staff to review the storm drainage situation at the southerly end of Round Lake Park. In 1972 Stage I construction of the storm sewer system designed to eliminate the flooding problems north of Luther Way and west of County Road No. 4 was completed. State II construction would require the installation of 12" RCP pipe from the manhole located behind lots 6 & 7, Block 1, Kirk Meadows, to the ponding area located west of County Road No. 4 and north of the entrance road to the park as shown on the attached drawing. The Stage II construction will be accomplished by City forces which will minimize the cost of installation. The estimated cost of materials is shown below: 475 L.F. - 12" pipe @ 6.34/ft. = $3,012 2 Standard manholes @ 314/ea. _ $628_ 1 Catch basin @ $105 = $105 3 castings @ $130 Ea. _ $390 Total estimated cost = $4,135 Funding for this cost can come from the Park Oept. maintenance budget and/or cash park fees per Bob Lambert. It may be possible to be reimbursed by Hennepin County for a portion of the cost because the Co. Rd. 4 R/W area does drain into this system. Recommend that the Council receive this memo and authorize the staff to • proceed with installation this fall. 214'7I MEMO TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer 1 DATE: October, 3, 1980 SUBJECT: Deferred Assessments for Neill Lake Drainage Oistrict • As directed by the Council on September 16, we have mailed the attached notice to those property owners involved with deferred assessments for the Neill Lake storm sewer project, I.C. 51-259. A listing of these owners, indicating the assessment amounts is also attached. Unless other- wise directed by the Councilwe will plan to certify these assessments to the County by October 10. CJJ:kh attachments 4 • • • • • zv12- i _ 1 flair., Cloud Cr. 8541 flying Cloud Dr. 9513 Franlo kd. [ail Frame, Mn. 55344 Fden Prairie, Mn. 55344 Eden Prairie, Mn. 55 .i4 $425.50 8/i/.00 4- 16-22 33 0003— i i4 11G 22 14 1]6-22 33 0014 25 1]n-22 12 0002 Lorene A Gleason William B Nelson I Thrives S riWg Cloud • 9555 Franlo Road 85S Flying Cloud Dr. 8551 Flying Cloud Dr. Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344 • Eden Prairie, Mn. 5534.4 ;. Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344 .e 'Ai.00 $814.00_ 425'.s0 25-]]6-22 12 0003 14-116 22 33 0004 • 14-116-22 33 0015 • Harold Daily • Richard J Vosmek •• 8511 Flying Cloud Dr. 8108 Eden Road Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344 Eden.Prairie, Mn; 55344 . $934.25 $88.7.60 14-116 22 33 0005 14-116-22 24 0D06 • . Wm. W McNabb Robert C Bouton 8501 Flying Cloud Dr. • 5049. 9 Mile Creek Circle Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344 • Bloomington, Mn. 55437 $471.75 . 4_040.90 14 116-22 33 0011 14-116-22 34 0012 • Charles E Blesener • A H 8470 este rhaus ' 8561 Franlo Road • Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344 Eden Prairie, Mn.55344 • ' $1,110.00 $2,152.43, 14:116-22 1 3 0002 14-116-22'34 0013 Kenneth J Nygaard Douglas K Grobe 11'"'0 Franlo Rd. • 11701.Franlo. Road EdLa Prairie, Mn. 55344 Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344 $1;387.50 • $5,457_50 14-116-22 43 0004 23-116-22 12 0001 ' George J Karsko The Preserve 8511 Franlo Rd. 11111 Anderson Lakes Pkwy Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344 Eden Prairie, MN. 55344 $4,216.10 • $740.00 14-116-22 43 0005 23-116-22 44 0001 Singletree Co. Everett H Nesbitt _ 6519 Nicollet Ave. 8611 Flying Cloiid Dr. Richfield, Mn. 55423 Eden0Prairie, Mn 55344 $ 1,743.48 23=112i. r 0 0002 14-116-22 13 0005 Charles W Pufahr • Curtis S Connaughty • 8560 Franlo Road 11860 Sunnybrook Road Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344 Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344 $4]4.40) • $1,'.., 23=11b=22 43 000) 14-116-22 34 0004 • .- -- Walter J Kaye • Harley 0 Pufahl 11970 Sunnybrook Road 8`10 Franlo Rd. Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344 f' r iri , Mrn 55344 5'25.40 ,e,l16-22 4 Sl 276.50 23 116 22 43 0002 • l4 116=22 3a ouu5/D6__ . • Willard S Anderson Elliott A Stavrum11985 Sunnybrook Rd R531 flying Cloud Dr. Mn. 55344 2 4 7 2f� Eden Prairie, Mn 55344 Eden Prairie, . . ,,, •., 11 »nil $.7.755...1-° 23-116-22 43 0003 '4.VOl.00 T I -E L' •L=.J CITY OFFICES/C35O EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD/EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55344/TELEPHONE 1612)937-2262 �: } c • September 22, 1980 i jk Re: Levy of Deferred Special Assessments 2 for Neill Lake Drainage District • Improvements, # • I.C. 51-259 Dear Property Owner: - On October 7, 1975 the Eden Prairie City Council conducted a public hearing pursuant to Minn. Statutes Chapter 429 to determine the special assessment benefits for certain storm drainage improvements in the Neill Lake Drainage district. At that time the Council determined the amount of benefit to be `' assigned to each parcel within the district limits and further determined that: . " a 5-year deferment, without interest, shall be allowed for all developed, single family lots for which a building permit i ( was issued on or before June 22, 1971." As of October 7, 1980 the deferments so granted by the City will expire. Accordingly, the City Council has directed the City staff to notify all affected property owners that said special assessments will now be certified to Hennepin Co. for collection in the same manner as for real estate taxes. The original assessment assigned to your property is $ . This . total will be spread over a period of 17 years, beginning in 1981,at 8% interest. The property owner may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County auditor, pay. to the City all or any part of the assessment • prior to November 15th of the year of assessment. Senior citizens are reminded that special assessment deferments are available to them with the following general limitations: The property must be home- . steaded and have a market value of $130,000 or less and the combined annual income of husband and wife does not exceed $9,000. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact the Eden Prairie Engineering Dept. at 937-2262. City of Eden Prairie— Engineering Dept. l • • ILL17. MEMO • TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: October 3, 1980 SUBJECT: Resolution No. R80-201, Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Report and Plans and Specifications for Tax Increment District Improvements On Thursday, October 2, we met with Mr. Bill Crawford, Director of MN/DOT District 5, to discuss the potential for assistance from the State for implementation of the various improvement projects within the tax in- crement district, as shown on the attached list. Mr. Crawford noted that the State has not scheduled a letting date for Project No. 2, which means that this project does not have funding at this time and the pros- pects for State funding are not good. Therefore, we should include this project in our tax increment district as planned. Mr. Crawford offered to provide right-of-way acquisition services for Projects 1, 2 and 3, but any further engineering help from MN/DOT is very doubtful. It is recommended that the Council adopt Resolution No. R80-201, ordering preparation of a feasibility report for all projects and also preparation of plans and specs. A public hearing will be required because of the proposed $40 per front foot assessment for street benefits, plus assess- ments for lateral sewer and water lines as required. We are recommending BRW, Inc., for engineering assistance on Projects 1, 2 and 3, RCM Assoc., for Projects 4 and 5, and the City Engineering Staff for Projects 6 and 7. CJJ:kh ' Attachments • • 21113 • • October 7, 1980 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOIA RESOLUTION NO. R80-201 RESOLUTION ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND PRPEPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECS FOR IMPROVEMENTS IN THE TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, it is proposed to make the following improvements within the City's tax increment district. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: 1. That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study with the assistance of BRW and RCM Assoc., and that a feasibility report shall be prepared • and presented to the City Council with all convenient speed. advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment and feasibility of the proposed improve- ments. 2. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for this project and is hereby directed to prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement, with the..assistance of BRW and RCM Assoc.,. Consulting Engineers. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor I ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, Clerk • 2416 A EXHIBIT A PROJECT DESCRIPTION • TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS 1. Schooner Boulevard/I-494 underpass and connection from W.7Bth St. to Valley View Rd. Grading, curb and gutter, storm drainage, sidewalks, bituminous surfacing, bridge, ramps and traffic signals. 0.64 miles. (SE quadrant) I.C. 51-308A (BRW) • 2. T.H. 169 from W. 78th Street to Valley View Rd. Bridge widening and widening T.H. 169 to four lanes. 0.6 miles. I.C. 51-30B8 (8RW) 3. Widen Valley View Road/I-494 bridge and construct ramps to I-494. Also grading and widening existing Valley View Road from T.H. 169 to I-494. 0.75 miles (NE quadrant) I.C. 51-308C (BRW) 4. Valley View Road - Mitchell Road to Menards & Schooner Boulevard to T.H. 5. Grading, curb and gutter storm drainage. Sidewalks and bituminous surfacing. 1.37 miles. (NW quadrant) I.C. 51-340A (RCM) 5. Baker/Mitchell Road connection. Grading, curb and gutter, storm drainage, sidewalks and bituminous surfacing along new alignment of Mitchell Road from Valley View Road to Baker Road. 0.5 miles I.C. 51-340B (RCM) 6. Schooner Boulevard T.H. 169 to T.H. 5. Grading, curb and gutter, storm drainage, sidewalks and bituminous surfacing. 0.85 miles. (SW quadrant) I.C. 51-398 (City staff) 7. Valley View Road from Washington Avenue to 0.5 miles west. Grading and widening existing road and traffic signal at Washington Avenue. I.C. 51-335 (City staff) TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John D. Frane, Finance Director DATE: September 17, 1980 Re: Procedure for collection of delinquent water and sewer bills I would suggest that the City adopt the following policy relative to past due utility bills: 1. The City staff should contact delinquent property owners and attempt to obtain a satisfactory re- payment plan. 2. If a satisfactory repayment plan cannot be secured or if the delinquent does not abide by the term of the plan then these accounts will be transmitted to the County in accordance with M.S.A. 444, Subd. 3 annually with the highest interest allowed by law. 1. Owner occupied properties; $200 or less delinquent - - collectable over 1 year 1 over $200 - - collectable over 2 years 2. All other properties - - collectable over 1 year JDF:bw 9/17/80