HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 09/16/1980 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 1980 7:30 PM, CITY HALL
ti
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Dean Edstrom, Dave
Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and Paul Redpath
COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney
Roger Pauly; Planning Director Chris Enger; f.
Finance•Director John Frane; Director.of
Community Services Bob Lambert; City
Engineer Carl Jullie; and Joyce Provo,
Recording Secretary
INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL i.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Final plat approval for Pheasant Oaks (Resolution No. 80-184) Page 2268
B. Final plat approval for Sunset Trails Estates (Resolution No. 80-185) Page 2271 N
C. Set Public Hearing for October 21, 1980 a'nd November 4, 1980 for
Cable TV
D. Request to set Hearing for Lake Riley Estates Plat for October 21, Page 2273
1980
E. Resolution No. 80-178, appointing Lorena Marks to the Community Page 2274
Development Block Grant Planning Area Advisory Committee
F. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 80-21. rezoning 2 acres from Rural to Page 2275 1
R1-13.5 for 4 lots for Neill Woods 2nd Addition by The Preserve
G. Final plat approval for Neill Woods 2nd Addition (Resolution No. 8C-173) Page 2276
H. Final approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the Page 2278
amount of $4,000,000.00 for Vikings II, Inc. (Resolution No. 80-179)
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Renaminy_pf 8 cul-de-sacs off Bluff's Boulevard (continued from Page 2278A
B. 1980 Special Assessments (Resolution No. 80-181, approving 198D Special Page 2279 1
Assessment Rolls)
C. Request for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of Page 2283
$-,000,000.00 for Minnesota Industrial Tools, Inc. (Resolution No.80-180)
• D. Redevelopment Plan proposed by Housing & Redevveelo�ment Authority as Pigs 2295A
well as the Eden Prairie Tax Increment Financing Plan and District
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,September 16, 1980
4
IV. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 3104 - 3309 Page 2296
V. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
VI. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Gelco First Addition by Gelco Corporation. Request for PUD Development Page 2311
Stage approval to preliminary plat the 60 acre Gelco PUD into 9 lots
and 10 outlots. Located north of Anderson Lakes and South of 1-494
and West of 78th Street (Resolution No. 81-114) - Continued from ,.
July 1, 1980
VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
B. Report of City Attorney
C. Report of City Manager
1. 1981 City Budget
2. Purgatory Creek Study - Major Center Area (Don Brauer) Page 2309
D. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Red Rock Park - alternate sites (continued from 8/5/81) Page 2310
2. Hidden Ponds Park security fence costs \l/ Page 2311
3. Railroad right-of-way appraisal Page 2312
• 4. Request from Larry Heinen regarding tax-forfeited land Page 2314 1
5. Resolution No. 81-177, authorizing filing of application for Page 2318
grants to acquire park land under the provisions of the Federal
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act and the State Natural
Resources Fund
6. Award bids for Hidden Ponds and Creekwood Park improvements Page 2321
E. Report of City Engineer
1. Consider bids for street improvements in Hipp's Mitchell Heights Page 2324
4th Addition, I.C. 51-353A (Resolution No. 81-182)
2. Approve specifications for lime sludge removal at water plant and Page 2326
order advertisement for bids
3. Receive feasibility report for storm drainage outlet for Lake Page 2327
Idlewild, I.C. 51-385 (Resolution No. 81-183)
4. Request from Bloomington for Eden Prairie's participation for Page 2328
storm sewer on Riverview Road
fi.
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,September 16, 1981
F. Report of Finance Director
�. Clerk's License List Page 2334
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
IX. ADJOURNMENT.
CITY DF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.R80-184 '
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
• OF PHEASANT OAKS
WHEREAS, the plat of PHEASANT OAKS • has been sub- .
mitted in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance
Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all-proceedings have been
duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and .
the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordin-
ances of the City of Eden Prairie. •
•
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat Approval Request for PHEASANT OAKS is approved
upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
Report on this plat dated September 10, 1980.
' B. Variance i•s herein granted from City Ordinance No, 93, Sec. 8,
Subd. 1 waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the
approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final
(11 plat as described in said Engineer's Report.
•
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of
this resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Regis-
• trar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3.
D. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy -
of this Resolution to the owners and-subdividers of the above named
plat.
E. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute
the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon com-
pliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on
•
•
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE •
ENGINEERING REPDRT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
•
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: September 10, 1980
SUBJECT: Pheasant Oaks
PROPOSAL: The developer, Butler Homes, is requesting City Council approval
of the final plat of Pheasant Oaks, a single family residential plat.
The first phase, now submitted consists of 28 residential lots and
5 Outlots. Outlots B and C will be replatted as phasing continues,
in conformance with the approved preliminary plat, Outlots A, D and
E which contain ponding areas and proposed walkways will be dedicated
to the City through Warranty Deeds upon filing of the final plat,
The plat is located south of Scenic Heights and Village Woods 2nd
Additions, east of Red Rock Hills 3rd Addition and west of Mitchell Rd.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on April
18th, 1978 per Resolution No. 78-57.
Zoning to RI-13.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on
June 7, 1978 per Ordinance No. 78-17.
The Development Agreement referred to within this report was executed on
June 28th, 1978.
VARIANCES: A variance from the requirements of Ordinance #93, Sec. 8,
Subd. 1, waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval
date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be
necessary.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: The requirements for the installation of municipal
utilities, streets and walkways are covered in the Development
Agreement.
•
The developer has consented to the platting and installation of Village
Woods Drive to it's connection with the existing roadway in Red Rock
Hills 3rd Addition.
The street name "Hilltop Circle" as shown on the plat is incorrect and
will be changed to "Hiawatha Avenue" prior to release of the final plat.
City acceptance of utilities previously installed will be pending
final inspections, receipt of test results and a 2 year warranty bond.
PARK DEDICATION: Requirements for park dedication are covered in the
Development Agreement.
-2-
A cash contribution at current rates will be required for park
dedication on a per lot basis upon issuance of building permits.
BONDING: A performance bond or letter of credit in conformance with the
Developer's Agreement for all utilities, streets and walkways to be
owned and maintained by the City.
The cost of improving Village Woods Drive to Red Rockc•Nills 3rd will
be included in the bond amount.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Pheasant Oaks
•
subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement
and the following:
1. Receipt of cash deposit for street lighting in the amount of
$1,180.00.
2. Receipt of fee for City Engineering in the amount of $840.00.
3. Receipt of Warranty Deeds for Outlots A, D and E.
$. Satisfaction Bonding requirements.
•
127
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESDTA
RESOLUTION NO. RBO-1B5 •
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
•
• OF SUNSET TRAILS ESTATES
WHEREAS, the plat of Sunset Trails Estates • has been sub-
mitted
in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance
Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all-proceedings have been
duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and
the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordin-
.ances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE: -A. Plat Approval Request for Sunset Trails Estates is approved
upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
Report on this plat dated September 10, 1990. •
:.'
' B. Variance is herein granted from City Ordinance No. 93, Sec. D.
Subd. 1 waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the
approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final
( plat as described in said Engineer's Report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of
this Regis-
trar ofsTitlesn in the for their useeasf the requiredibyer MSAf Deed 462.358,d/or S s
ubd. 3.
D. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy
of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named
plat.
E. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute
the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon com-
pliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on
•
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
o n . rave, C er
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT DN FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
e.
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: September 10, 1980
• . SUBJECT: Sunset Trails Estates
PROPOSAL: The developer, Countryside Investments, Inc. has requested City
Council approval of the final plat of Sunset Trails Estates. This is
a single family residential plat of 18 lots located west of Duck
Lake Road and north of Sunset Ridge and Valley Knolls Additions in
Section 5. Outlot A consists of flood plain area and two areas
(approximately 3 acres) of higher ground. The areas.of high ground
will be dedicated to the City through Warranty Deeds. These areas
will be shown on the plat as Outlots, to simplify conveyance, prior
to release of the plat.
HISTDRY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on March 18, 1980
( per Resolution #80-42.
Zoning ro RI-13.5 was finally read and approved by the Council on May 6,
198D per Ordinance #80-08.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed
on May 6, 1980.
VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of
Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: The requirements for the installation of utilities and
streets are covered in the Developer's Agreement.
PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for bonding are covered in the Developer's
. Agreement.
•
RECDMMENDATIDN: Recommend approval of the final plat of Sunset Trails Estates
subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement,
and the following:
1. Receipt of cash deposit for street lighting in the amount of $984.
2. Warranty Deed to be filed with final plat.
2212
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Y ,»))) l) CONSULTING ENGINEERS ■LANO SURVEYORS ■SITE PLANNERS
Ripply To:
12800 Industrial Park Boulevard
SEP 11. 1980 Plymouth,Minnesnb 56141
18121 21 55 6693700
September 9, 1980
Mr. Roger Ulstad, City Manager
City of Eden Prairie
8950 County Road No. 4
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Subject: Ecklund-Swedlund Proposal
LAKE RILEY ESTATES
Job #5519
Dear Mr. Ulstad:
The above mentioned proposal received approval at the
September 8th Planning Commission Meeting. Supportive data was
submitted to the City Staff in August.
We are seeking Council approval of the Preliminary Plat with
variances to permit reduced lot sizes. Please place this item
on your next available Council agenda. Thank you.
•
Sincerely,
McCOMES--KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
40.6. ,l�//I
David J. 'Squir�
DJS:ch
cc: Len Swedlund
l
Minneapolis• Hutchinson•Alexandria-Granite Falls
3$til if 7 011.1':Ly1.,J11 1,41,4
.07,72
CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 80-178
RESOLUTION APPOINTING YEAR VII C.D.B.G`.
PLANNING AREA CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMISSION MEMBER
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie is cooperating with Hennepin
County and fourty-one units of local government to constitute an Urban
County under the provisions of the Housing and Community Development '
Action of 1974, as amended in 1977, and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Program regulations establish
requirements for the provision of citizen participation, and
• WHEREAS, Urban Hennepin County in response to the program regula-
tions is establishing Citizen Advisory Committees, one within each Urban
•
County Planning Area, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Area Citizen Advisory Committee's primary
responsibility is to review appropriately Community Development Block
Grant Program issues within its member area.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Eden Prairie appoints Lorena Marks-
to serve as a member on the Planning Area Citizen Advisory Committee
ADOPTED_by the City Council on the 16 day of SPptemhar , 1980.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City.Clerk SEAL
CITY OF EDEN PRIARIE 1
( HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ;
Ordinance No. 80-21
AN ORDINANCE REELLATINGCEONO ZONING
AND AMENDING
ORDIN. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DDES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended as follows:
That part of Outlot R, LAKE EDEN, according to the recorded plat thereof,
1
Hennpein County, Minneosta, described as follows: )
Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Outlot R; thence
South 89 degrees 38 minutes 22 seconds West, assumed bearing
along the southerly line of said Outlot R, a distance of
205.54 feet; thence North 0 degrees 47 minutes 27 seconds East a
distance of 200.50 feet; thence northeasterly 261.10 feet along e
a tangent curve, concave to the southeast, having central angle
of 54 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds and a radius of 277.04 feet; I
thence North 54 degrees 47 minutes 27 seconds East, tangent to
the last described curve, a distance of 112.86 feet to the
easterly line of said Outlot R; thence South 0 degrees 47 minutes
27 seconds West, along said easterly line a distance of 486.84
feet to said point of beginning.
shall be and hereby is removed from the
Rural District
and shall be included hereafter in the
R1-13,5 District.
Section 2. The above property shall be subject to the terms and conditions of
the ordinances, rules and regulations of the City of Eden Prairie relating to the i
R1-13.5 District.
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Eden Prairie on the 2 day of September , 1980 and finally read
and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council
of said City on the day of , 1980.
o •
gang , Penze - ayor
1 .
ATTEST;
John D. Frane - City Clerk 2216
Dn01 Icuc11 ;.. ♦Ln c.lnn or•n irin IJo...e nn Om Any of
1980.
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
t •
RESOLUTION NO.R80-173
• OFRESNeiIl l OWoAPPROVING
dsP 2n dI Addition PLAT
WHEREAS, the plat of Neill Woods 2nd Addition. has been sub-
mitted
in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance
Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all•proceedings have been
duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and
the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordin-
•
ances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat Approval Request for Neill Woods 2nd Addition is approved
upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
Report on this plat dated August 26, 1980
' B. Variance is herein granted from City Ordinance No. 93, Sec. 8,
Subd. 1 waiving the six month thaximum time elapse between the
approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final
( plat as described in said Engineer's Report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of
this resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Regis-
. trar of Titles for their use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3.
D. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy
of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named
plat.
E. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute
the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon com-
pliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on
• 9
•
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frame, Clerk
i
4
,
( CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT •
t
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager `
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer . aj
DATE: August 26, 1980
SUBJECT: Neill Woods 2nd Addition
PROPOSAL: The developer, the Preserve, is requesting final plat approval of
Neill Woods 2nd Addition. This is a single family residential plat
(RI-13.5) consisting of four lots and Preserve Boulevard R/W located s
southwesterly of and adjacent to Preserve Center 2nd Addition and
northerly of and adjacent to Neill Woods Additon. This plat was
originally part of the Lake Heights Addition prop, T
l.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on
February 6, 1979 as part of the Lake Heights Addition proposal, per
Resolution #79-26.
( Zoning to RI-13.5 is scheduled for a second reading before the City
Council on September 16, 1980.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report is scheduled
• for execution on September 16, 1980.
VARIANCES: A variance from the requirements of Ordinance #93, Sec. 8,
Subd. 1, waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval ;
• date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be
necessary.
r •
UTILITIES AND STREETS: The requirements for the installation of utilities v
and streets are covered in the Developer's Agreement. i
t PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the
• Developer's Agreement.
BONDING: The requirements for bonding are covered in the Developer's Agreement.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Neill Woods 2nd
Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's
Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of cash deposit for street lighting in the amount of $196.80.
s
2. Receipt of fee for City Engineering in the amount of 5120.
221111.
C
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John D. Frane
DATE: September 12, 1980
RE: Final approval of M.I.D.B.'S for Vikings II - $4,000,000
This request for final approval will conclude the revenue bond transaction
for the Vikings II Project. Resolution #80-179 has not been included in
your packet because of its length. It will be in the Mayor's signature
file on Tuesday September 16th.
22�
•
•
MEMO
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: Street Name Changes
Bluffs Blvd.-Homeward Hills Rd.
• On Friday afternoon, 9/11, Mr. Wally James, resident and spokesman for
the Bluffs West neighborhood, deliverd a list of street names proposed
by the residents for eight of the cul-de-sacs off Homeward Hills Road
(Bluffs Blvd.) in the Bluffs West subdivision. Two of the proposed
named (Hawthorne Court and Windswept) are unacceptable because they
are the same as, or similar to, existing street names. We will be
checking with the Post Office Department for verification of the other
six names. There is one additional cul-de-sac in the area which is
platted but all the abutting lots are now vacant.
At this time we have 100% petitions covering only two of the cul-de—sacs.
Mr. James said he would try to secure the remaining petitions over the
weekend and deliver same to us on Monday.
We will be prepared to further report to the Council on Tuesday evening.
i
CJJ:kh
•
0
Sept. 16, 1980
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA •
RESOLUTION NO. R80-181
RESOLUTION APPROVING 1980 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given at.required by
law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections
in the proposed assessments for the following improvements, to wit:
(See Exhibit A attached)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
1. Such proposed assessments are hereby accepted and shall con-
stitute the special assessment against the lands in the
final assessment rolls, and each tract of land therein
included is hereby found to be benefitted by the improve-
ment in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual install-
ments extending over a period of years as shown on Exhibit
A, the first of the installments to be payable on or before
the first Monday in January, I980. Subsequent installments
shall bear interest at the rate of 6.86 percent per annum.
No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is
paid on or before November 15, 1980.
3. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of
this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the
propert tax lists of the Councy, and such assessments shall be
collected and paid over in the same manner as other muncicpal
taxes.
4. The assessment data of Resolution No. R80-153 is herein
revised in accordance with Exhibit A attached hereto.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
•
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
•
RESOLUTION NO. R80- 181
EXHIBIT A
1. I.C. 51-322
Utilities & street Project Cost $1,073,496
improvements in High Trunk Assessments •,• 37,664
Trails, Valley Knolls 2nd, Total. $1,111,160
Sunset Trails and abutting City share for trunk costs 28,364
Duck Lake Road north of and sidewalk past City park
Duck Lake Trail Net Assessment $1,082,796•
$1,724/lot L21, 22, 23 & 24, B4 High Trails Estates (4 lots)
$11,731/lot High Trails Est., remaining lots to be assessed (74)
$11,305/lot Valley Knolls 2nd Add.. (10 lots)
$10,808/lot Tract B, RLS 11 (1 lot)
$5,835/lot 5-116-22 32 0001 A T.B.A at time of conn. (1 lot
$10,808/lot 5-116-22 32 0001 B T.B.A. at time of conn. 1 lot)
5 years at 8.5%
2. I.C. 51-342
Streets and utility Project Cost $254,647
improvements in
Mitchell Lake-Estates N13,402/ac. Mitchell Lake Estates
5 years at 8.5%
3. I.C. 51-344
Utility and street • Project Cost $975,152
improvements in Shady
Oak Industrial Park 1, 2, $15,914/ac. Shady Oak Ind. Park 1st, 2nd,
3, 4 & 5 3rd, 4th and 5th Add. (100.71 ac.)
17 years at 8.5%
136
R80 •
-
Exhibit A (cont'd.)
( 4. I.C. 51-351 & 51-351A
Utility and street improvements Project Cost $975,152
in Round Lake Estates 2nd Add. Trunk Assessment 71,840
$1,046,992
City share for trunk costs
and lateral costs to others 320,809
Net assessment for Round Lake $726,183
Estates 2nd Add.
,' 10.5 5/lot Round Lake Estates 2nd (69 lots)
• ( $3,81ot L10, B4 Heritage Park 1st (1 lot)
$4,450/lot L11 & 12, B4 " " " (2 lots)
(51-351A assessed in 1979)
5 years at 8.5%
•
• r
5. I.C. 51-353
Streets and utilities in Project Cost $212,854
Hipps Mitchell Heights 4th
$3,801/lot Hipps Mitchell Heights 4th (56 lots)
5 years at 8.5%
6. I.C. 51-355
Streets and utilities in Project Cost $636,846
Cardinal Creek Addition
$11,372/lot Cardinal Cryek 1st (56
5 years at 8.5%
7. I.C. 51-259
Deferred assessments now due This project was assessed in
for Neill Lake Storm Sewer 1975. Single family homesteaded
District parcels (24) were deferred for
5 years without interest ($36,059)/
These assessments will now be
certified for collection.
17 years at 8.0% (original interest rate)
227I 1
o-„
R80-
Exhibit A (cont'd.) 1.
q
$34,124 17 years at 8.5% 1
8. Supplemental Trunks 11,955 17 years at 8.0% a
9. Supplemental laterals $6,693 17 years at 8.5%
$3,521 17 years at 8.0X
10. ' Tree removal --
• " - 4-]16-22 31 0026 •$•216._ :- .4-]16-22 44 0009 $' 80.. '
26-116-22 22 0055 : 126 9-1]6-22 12 0002 .$ 110. 4-116-22 44 0006 $ '40•
2b-116-22 22 0025 10-116-22 31 0003 ;$- 4-]1f,-22 43 0088.$ 45.. 1
25-116-22 21 0040 $46 •'8-116-22 11 0060 $ 75. 4-116-22 43 0111 $ 640. P`
25-116-22 21 0033 $56 • 3-116-22 24 0001 $ 625. 4-116-22 43-0069 $ 210.
25-116-22 12 0076 $46 25-116-22 13 0048 $ 174' •- • 4-116-22 34 0049$ 294.
24-116-22 43 0014 $56 25-116-22 13 0014 $ 76. 4-116-22 34 0050$ 110.
•
24-116-22-43-0018 24-116-22 24 0101 $800 23-116-22 22 001.1 $ 392. 4_116-22 34 0051 $ 67.
g422 23-116-22 22-0012 $ 10.: 4-116-22 34 0055$ 337.
14-116-22 32 0002• ,$374 • 23-116-22 23 0003 $ 976. 4-116-22 43 0113$ 545.
14-116-22 14 0001 $436 23-116-22 23 0001 $ 425. 4-116-22 43 0114$ 435.
_14-116-22 14 0016. $246 25-116-22 12 0017 $ 1337. 4_116-22 43 0115$•280.
• 5-116-22 13 0001 $346 25-116-22p222 14q33 00041 $ 37. 4-116-22 43 0116$ 237.
c-116-22 41 0002 11,125 14y-1l6-22 24 8881 $ 200. 4-116-22 34 0064$ 63.
4-116-22 21 0030 45.
[5-116-22 41 0065 4;76 12-116-22 22 0003 $2714. 9_116-22 21 0037$ 284.
9-116-22 34 0029 $116 4-116-22 43 0102• $ 45. 4-116-22 34 0069$ 130..
9-116-22 31 0042 $116 4-116-22 43 0101 $ 475: 4-116-22 42 0003$2295.
9-116-22 31 0052 $116. 4-116-22 43 0103 $ 94. •230.
4-116-22 .42 0001$
_ 9-116-22 34 0016 $116. 4-116-22 43 0104 $ .25. 4-116-22 41 0005$ 47.
9-116-22 34 0026 • $346. 4-116-22 43 0072 $ 55. 4-116-22 41 0014$ 40.
9-116-22 34 0027. $146. 4-116-22 43 0076 $ 20. 4-116-22 42 0004$ 70.'.
' 9-116-22 21 0018 $48. 4-116-22 43'0080 $ 144. 4-116-22 41 0006$ 470.
9-116-22 12 0027 $216. • 4-116-22 44 0009 $ 100
1 year at 8.5% -
11. SAC Charges $1,050 2 years at 8.5%
12. T.H. 169 $34,025 17 years at 8.0% ,
13. Ring Road $210.75 17 years at 8.5%
Ring Road $208.25 17 years at 8.0%
14. Ring Rd. STM
$1,644 17 years at 8.0%
15. Singletree STM $1,360 17 years at 8.0% .
16. Re-assessment of Dell Rd. $200,000 �ya vs at 8.5%
project, 1.C. 51-326
2 282'
R80-
Exhibit A (cont'd.) •
8. Supplemental Trunks $34,124 17 ears at 8.5%
11,955 17 years at 8.0%
9. Supplemental laterals $6,693 17 years at 8.5%
$3,521 17 years at 8.0%
10.' Tree removal •
..• --
• - - 4-116-22 31 0026• 4-216. :_ 'q_116-22 44 0008 $'-80..
26-116-22 22 0055 ;$126 9-116-22 12 0002 ..$ 110.
• 26=116-22 22 0025 $46 10-116-22 31 0003 c 4_}}6-22 44 0006 $ 40.�$ 846. 4_11E-22 43 0088.$ 45._
25-116-22 21 0040 $46 ''8-116-22 11 0060 $ 75• • 4-116-22 43 0111 •$ 640.
25-116-22 21 0033 $56 • 3-116-22 214 0001 $ 625. 4_116-22 43-0069 $ 210.
25-116-22 12 0076 $46 .25-116-22 13 0048 $ 174. • 4-116-22 34 0049 $ 294.
24_116-22 43 0014 $56 25_116-22 13 0014 $ 76. 4-116-22 34 0050$ 110.
• 24-116-22-43-0018 $8 0 23-116-22 22 001.1 $ 392. 4-116-22 34 0051 $ 67.
24-116-22 24 0101 .$374 •
$422 23-116-22 22.0012 $ 10.: 4-116-22 34 0055E 337. 1
14-116-22 32 0002• • 23-116-22 23 0003 $ 976. 4-116-22 43 0113$ 545.
14-116-22 14 0001 23-116-22 23 0001 $ 425•
$436 4-116-22 43 0114$ 435.
14-116-22114 0016. $246 25-116-22 12 0017 $ 837• 4-116-22 43 0115$•280. •
• 5-116-22 13 0001 $346 25-116-22 13 00014 $ 837. 4-116-22 43 0116$ 237.
c-116-22 41 0002 $1,125 15_11 _�2 SSSI $ 200.• 4-116-22 21 0039$ 45.
-[5-116-22 41 0065 $1;,736 12-116-22 22 0003 $2714. g-116-22 21 0037$ 284.
'9-116-22 34 0029 $116 4-116-22 43 0102• $ 45. 4-116-22 34 0069$ 130..
9-116-22 31 0042 $116 4-116-22 43 0101 $ 475: 4-116-22 42 0003$2295.
9-116-22 31 0052 $116. •4-116-22 43 0103 $ L94• 2230.
4-116-22.42 0001$
_ 9-116-22 34 0016 $116. 4-116-22 43 0104 $ .25. 4-116-22 41 0001$ 47.
9-116-22 34 0026 • $346. 4-116-22 43 0072 $ 55. 4-116-22 41 0014$ 40.
9-116-22 34 0027. $146. 4-116-22 43 0076 $ 20. 4-116-22 42 0004$ 70... ,
• 9-116-22 21 0018 $48. 4-116-22 43'0080 $ 144. 4-116-22 41 0006$ 470.
00
9-116-22 12 0027 $216. • 4-116-22 44 OOOQ $ 1.
1 year at 8.5%
11. SAC Charges $1,050 2 years at 8.5% .
1
12. T.H. 169 $34,025 17 years at 8.0% ,
13. Ring Road $210.75 17 years at 8.5%
Ring Road $208.25 17 years at 8.0%
14. Ring Rd. STM $1,644 17 years at 8.0%
15. Singletree STM $1,360
17 years at 8.0%
16. Re-assessment of Oell Rd. $200,000 /•gears at 8.5%
•
project, I.C. 51-326 •
2 282• l
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John D. Frane
DATE: September 12, 1980
RE: M.I.D.B'S Minnesota Industrial Tools Project - $1,000,000
Richard Cohen and Gerald Portnoy propose to construct a 43,000 square
foot office warehouse building on part of the "Helle" property at a
cost of $1,288,000. The building would be 60% leased to Minnesota
Industrial Tools, Inc. which is owned by the Cohen Family. The property
is zoned I-2 which is proper for the intended use. Resolution #80-180
is attached for your consideration.
2.2713
•
(• f
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
{ Application for
Industrial Development Bond Project Financing
1. APPLICANT:
a. Business Name - Messrs. Richard W. Cohen and Gerald A. Portnoy
b. Business Address - c/o Minnesota Industrial Tools, Inc.
• 15755 - 32nd Avenue North
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
c. Business Form (corporation, partnership, sole proprietor-
ship, etc.) - Partnership to be organized.
d. State of Incorporation or organization - Minnesota.
•
e. Authorized Representative -
Mr. Richard W. Cohen - 553-3250
or
f. Phone - Mr. Gerald A. Portnoy - 332-3413
•
2. NAME(S) AND ADDRESSES OF MAJOR STOCKHOLDERS OR PRINCIPALS:
•
a. Mr. Richard W. Cohen
Minnesota Industrial Tools, Inc.
15755 - 32nd Avenue North
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
b. •
Mr. Gerald A. Portnoy
G S B Investments, Inc.
1924 Midwest Plaza Building
c. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
• -1-
201
•
o
• �.
3. GIVE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF BUSINESS, PRINCIPAL
�- PRODUCTS, ETC:
A partnership consisting of Messrs. Cohen and Portnoy will be organized
to own and operate the Project. Approximately 60% of the Project will
be leased to Minnesota Industrial Tools, Inc., a corporation controlled
by Mr. Cohen, with the balance of the space,approximately 17,000 square
feet in size, to be leased to unrelated tenants until such space is
needed by Minnesota Industrial Tools, Inc.
• 3'
4. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT - A 43,400 square foot combination office-
warehouse building.
a. Location and intended'use: West 74th Street off of Washington
Avenue South. Legally described as the East 250 feet of Lot 1, .
•
Block 1, Norseman Industrial Park 3rd Addition.
b. Present ownership of project site:
Herleiu and Borghild Belle
c. Names and address of architect, engineer, and general
contractor:
R. J. Ryan Construction, Inc.
One Apple Tree Square
Suite 1141
Bloomington, Minnesota 55420
Telephone - 612-854-2310
•
•
5. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST FOR:
Land 3.4 acres $ 275.000
Building 43,300 square feet $ 924.500
Equipment $ -O-
Other financing fees, $ 88,750
• construction period interest, it
legal fees and other soft •
costs
Total $, 1`28 .,250
4 �
-2-
. zZ�SS i
' f
6. BOND ISSUE - 1
R. Amount of proposed bond issue - $1,000,000
b. Proposed date of sale of bond - October, 1980
c. Length of bond issue and proposed maturities - 30 years
d. Proposed original purchaser of bonds - The bond will be placed
by Northland Mortgage Company with an institutional mortgage
lender yet to be determined.
e. Name and address of suggested trustee - N/A
f. Copy of any agreement between Applicant and original
purchaser - Financing commitment cannot be obtained until
passage of preliminary resolution.
g. Describe any interim financing sought or available -
Interim construction financing to be provided by !
institutional lender yet to be determined.
h. Describe nature and amount of any permanent financing
in addition to bond financing - All project costs in excess
of bond financing to be provided by Applicant in form of
cash equity contribution.
?.. BUSINESS PROFILE OF APPLICANT. j
a. Are you located in the City of Eden Prairie? No
•b. Number of employees in Eden Prairie?
i. Before this project: None
•
-3-
J
•
•
ii. After this project? Minnesota Industrial Tools, Inc.
presently employs in excess of 50 persons. It is
anticipated that the other tenants of the Project, yet
unidentified, will employ an additional 25 persons.
c. Approximate annual sales -
1980 annual sales for Minnesota Industrial Tools, Inc.
is estimated to be $12,000,000.
d. Length of time in business Minnesota Industrial Tools, Inc.
has been in business for 33 years.
in Eden Prairie None
e. Do you have plants in other locations? If so, where? •
Yes. Omaha, Nebraska, and Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
f. Are you engaged in international trade? No.
•
•
8. OTHER INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT(S):
a. List the name(s) and location(s) of other industrial
development project(s) in which the Applicant is the
owner or a "substantial user" of the facilities or a
"releated person" within the meaning of Section 103(b)(6)
of the Internal Revenue Code.
None.
•
• I
•
•
-4-
•
.27
b. List all cities in which the Applicant has requested
( industrial revenue development financing.
None. •
•
st the
cant
before
a. Detanyail otherecitytus forof any industrialedevelopmenti has
revenue financing.
None.
•
d. List any city in which the Applicant has been refused
industrial development revenue financing.
• None.
•
e. List any city (and the project name) where the Applicant
has acquired preliminary approval to proceed but in which
final approval authorizing the financing has been denied.
None.
•
•
,2221
_5_
•
f. If Applicant has been denied industrial development
revenue financing in any other city as identified
in (d) or (e), specify the reason(s) for the denial
and the name(s) of appropriate city officials who
have knowledge of the transaction.
None.
•
9. NAMES AND ADDRESS OF:
Mortgage Broker:
a. ttee=4 3c
Northland Mortgage Company
6600 France Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435
b. Private Placement Purchaser (If private placement)
Institutional mortgage lender yet to be determined.
•
i. If lender will not commit until City has
passed its preliminary resolution approving
the project, submit a letter from proposed
lender that it has an interest in the
offering subject to appropriate City
approval and approval of the Commissioner
of Securities.
.• I
•
•
•
•
•
-6 •
-
9
•
' b. Bond Counsel - Marvin C. Ingber and
Mackall, Crounse & Moore
1000 First National Bank Building
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
c. Corporate Counsel - Stanley V. Schanedling and
Stacker, Ravich & Simon
1500 Midwest Plaza
Minneapolis, Minnesota .55402
d. Accountant - Harold Gillman and
Rlane, Gillman & Schechter
3033 Excelsior Boulevard
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
•
10. WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR:
a. Construction start - September 22, 1980
b. Construction completion - January 15, 1981
•
•
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The undersigned Applicant.understands that the approval or
disapproval by the City of Eden Prairie for Industrial
Development bond financing does not expressly or impliedly
constitute any approval, variance, or waiver of any provision
or requirement relating to any zoning, building, or other rule
or applicablece of to thehe City propertyf Eden includedainithisr any project. law
PA44t41-6V-64—'
Applicant
•
•
/
isetd5
40 Applicant
August 27, 1980 •
• Date
-7-
22
f
. 11. ZONING - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
a. Property is zoned -
b. Present zoning ( (is not) correct for the intended
use.
c. Zoning application received on
for which is correct for the
intended use.
d. Variances required -
•
City Plan
•
•
•
-8-
22A 1i
•
RESOLUTION NO. jO '/d 0
RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A
PROJECT UNDER THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT ACT, AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF AN
APPLICATION TO THE MINNESOTA COMMISSIONER OF
SECURITIES FOR APPROVAL THEREOF AND AUTHORIZING •
EXECUTION OF A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AND
PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION
WITH THE PROJECT
. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (this "Council") of
the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: •
SECTION 1
Recitals and Findings
1.1 This Council called a public hearing on a proposal pre-
sented to it that the City undertake a project pursuant to the
Municipal Industrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
474, as amended (the "Act") consisting of the acquisition of approxi-
mately 3.34 acres of land in the City, the construction of a 43,300
square foot combination office-warehouse building thereon and the
{ purchase of equipment therefor (the "Project"). Under the proposal,
a partnership to be formed under the laws of the State of Minnesota
and consisting of Messrs. Richard W. Cohen and Gerald A. Portnoy
(the "Partnership") will enter into a loan agreement (the "Loan
• Agreement") with the City whereby the City agrees to issue and sell
• its $1,000,000 Industrial Development Revenue Bond in the form of a
single debt instrument (the "Bond") to partially finance the
Project and to loan the proceeds of such sale to the Partnership
which agrees to construct the Project. The Loan Agreement will
require the Partnership to pay amounts sufficient to pay the
. principal of and interest on the Bond. The Bond will be issued and
sold to an institutional investor, as a tax exempt mortgage financing,
and will be secured by a mortgage and other encumbrances on the
Project. The Partnership will retain title to and ownership of the
Project and will lease the Project to Minnesota Industrial Tools,
Inc., a Minnesota corporation controlled by Mr. Richard W. Cohen,
under lease terms sufficient to provide for the payment of principal
• of and interest on the Bond. The interest of the Partnership in
the lease and the interest of the City in the Loan Agreement will
be assigned to the holder of the Bond as additional security for
the Bond. The Bond will be issued and sold in accordance with the
Act and will provide that the Bond is payable solely from amounts
received by the City pursuant to the Loan Agreement and other
property pledged to its payment. The Bond will not be a general
obligation of the City or be payable from any other property or
funds of the City.
-2-
2202
1.2 At a public hearing, duly called, noticed and held on
September 16, 1980, in accordance with the Act, all parties desiring
to appear were afforded an opportunity to be heard. Based on such
public hearing and on such other facts and circumstances as this
Council deems relevant, this Council hereby finds, determines and
declares as follows:
(a) The purpose of the Act as found and determined by
the state legislature is to promote the welfare of the state by the
active attraction, encouragement and development of economically
sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible-the
emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic
unemployment. Factors necessitating the active promotion and
development of economically sound industry and commerce are the
increasing concentration of population in the metropolitan areas,
the rapidly rising increase in the amount and cost of governmental
services required to meet the needs of the increased population and
the need for development of land use which will provide an adequate
tax base to finance these increased costs and access to employment
opportunities for such population.
(b) The welfare of the residents of the state requires
the active promotion, attraction, encouragement and development of
economically sound industry and commerce through governmental acts;
the encouragement of employment opportunities for citizens of the
state and the City; and the development of industry to use available
resources of the City, in order to retain the benefit of its exist-
ing investment in educational and public service facilities.
(c) The Project would further the foregoing purposes
of the Act as contemplated by and described in Section 474.01 of
the Act.
(d) The City is authorized by the Act to issue its
industrial development revenue bonds to finance capital projects
consisting of properties used or useful in connection with a
revenue producing enterprise, such as that of the Project.
(e) This Council has been advised by Northland Mortgage
Company, agent for the Partnership (the "Agent") that conventional,
commercial financing to partially finance the cost of the.Project
is available on such a limited basis and at such high interest
rates that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would
be significantly reduced. However, with the aid of a municipal
borrower, and its resulting lower borrowing cost, the economic
feasibility of the Project would be substantially increased and
that the issuance of the Bond by the City would be a significant
inducement to the Partnership to construct the Project in the City.
- i
276A -3-
(f) Tne existence of the Project would add to the tax
base of the City and of the county and school district in wnich the
Project is located and would provide increased employment opportu-
nities for residences of the City and the surrounding area.
SECTION 2
Preliminary Approval of•Project
2.1 On the basis of information provided to_rbjs Council, it
appears that it would be in the'best interest of the City to issue
the Bond in accordance with the Act, in an amount not to exceed
$1,000,000, in order to partially finance the cost of the Project.
2.2 The Project is hereby given preliminary approval and the
issuance of the Bond by the City in the foregoing amount is also
hereby approved, subject to approval of the Project by the Commission-
er of Securities, Minnesota Department of Commerce (the "Commissioner");
the fulfillment of such other conditions as the City may require
with respect to the issuance of the Bond in connection with the
Project; and the mutual agreement of this Council, the Partnership
and the purchaser of the Bond as to the structuring of the financing
and as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required
for the transaction.
2.3 Nothing in this resolution or in the documents prepared
pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any funds of the
.City on the Project other than the revenues derived therefrom or
otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Bond shall not
constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon
any property or funds of the City, except the Project and the
revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the
City be subject to any liability thereon. No holder of the Bond
shall have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of
the City to pay the outstanding principal of or interest on the
Bond, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the
City except the Project. The Bond shall recite on its face that
the principal of- and interest on the Bond is payable solely from
the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Bond
shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any
constitutional or statutory limitation.
2.4 The forms of Memorandum of Agreement between the City and
the Partnership and the Application for Approval of Municipal
Industrial Revenue Bond Project by the City to the Commissioner,
together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, substantially
in the forms presented herewitn, are hereby approved, and the Mayor
and City Manager are authorized to execute said documents on behalf
of the City and, in accordance with Section 474.01, Subdivision 7a
of the Act, are hereby authorized and directed to cause said
2294 -4- !,
�. Application to be submitted to the Commissioner for approval of the
Project. The Mayor, City Manager, City Attorney and other officers,
employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed
to provide the Commissioner with any preliminary information the
Commissioner may need for this purpose.
2.5 Mackall, Crounse & Moore, acting as bond counsel, is
authorized to assist in the preparation and review of all documents
relating to the Project; to consult with the City Attorney, the
Partnership and the purchaser of the Bond as to the maturity,
interest rate and other terms and provisions of the Bond and as to
the covenants and other provisions of the operative documents; and
to submit such documents to this Council for final approval.
SECTION 3 •
•
General
3.1 The proponents of the Project have agreed to pay or cause
the Partnership to pay any and all costs incurred by the City in
connection with the Project whether or not the Project is approved
by the Commissioner; whether or not the Project is carried to
completion; and whether or not the Bond or operative instruments
are executed.
3.2 The proponents of the Project, on behalf of the Partner-
ship, are hereby authorized to enter into such contracts as may be
necessary for the construction of the Project by any means available ..
to it and in the manner it determines without advertisement for
bids as may be required for the construction or acquisition of
other municipal facilities.
3.3 The adoption of this resolution does not constitute a
guarantee or a firm commitment that the City will issue and sell
the Bond as requested by the Partnership. The City retains the
right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation, and
accordingly not issue the Bond, should the City at any time prior
to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest
of the City not to issue the Bond or should the parties to the
transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the structuring of
the financing or as to the terms and conditions of any of the
documents required for the transaction. ,
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, the 16th day of September, 1980.
' d
Mayor
Attest:
•
City Clerk
•
2.2°K-5-
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John D. Frane
DATE: September 12, 1980
RE: The Effect of Tax Increment Financing on School Districts.
- ..
School revenues are derived in two ways: State Aids and Local taxes.
The State Aid portion is the "levy limit" for school districts. A
district is allowed so many dollars per pupil for the cost of education.
The money comes from a fixed, by State Law which is the same for every
district, mill levy and State Aids by this formula;
Per pupil cost less mill levy dollars equals State Aid.
Local taxes may also be used for other items in a schools budget: Bonds
and interest, capital expenditure and the up to six mill allowed by local
referrendun.
The use of tax increment financing has no effect on the per pupil portion
of a districts revenues. The State contributes the difference between the
taxes collected and the amount allowed per pupil.
The use of tax increment financing on bonds, interest, capital expenditure,
etc., has no effect on the dollars the district will receive; it effects
the mill rate of the district. Dollars levied divided by assessed valuation
equals the mill rate.
It can effect either the total dollars collectable under the six mill
provision, should a district choose to levy the total six mills; or the
mill rate itself if a district chose to levy a number of dollars which
would have caused a mill rate of less than six mills had the City not
instituted a tax increment financing district.
2296
•
• September 16, 1980
STATE OF MINNESOTA
a( ' OF EOEN PRAIRIE
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows:
3012 VOIO OUT CHECK $ (1,821.92
3104 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Postage 531.13
3105 OAVIO KEISKE Teen Center Band 250.00
3106 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. Wine 344.38
3107 PAUSTIS.& SONS Wine 296.8C
3108 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE Liquor 1,435.88
3109. • BUTCH'S BAR SUPPLY Supplies-Liquor store _ 188.15
3110 ED PHILLIPS & SONS Liquor 1,617.82
3111 OLO PEORIA COMPANY, INC. Liquor 1,983.92
3112 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. Liquor 1,488.12
3113 MINNESOTA OISTILLERS, INC. Liquor 1,196.97'
3114 MINNESOTA WINE MERCHANTS Wine 176.95
3115 FEOERAL RESERVE BANK Payroll 12,287.41`
3116 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE Payroll 14,409.8E
3117 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE Payroll 1,038.00
3118 P E R A Payroll 9,030.511
3119 STATE TREASURER, SOCIAL SECURITY Payroll 19,292.2
3120 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS Payroll 29.5C
3121 CHANHASSEN TIRE & AUTO U-Haul rental-Park dept 40.00
219.2 PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL ASSOCIATES Rent-Liquor store 2,114.5E
L _3 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLICE Conference-Police dept 150.0C
3124 VOIO OUT CHECK
3125 SOUTH ST. PAUL FEED Posts-Park dept 2,416.52
3126 MIOWEST WINE CO. Wine 617.97
3127 MINNESOTA DISTILLERS, INC. Liquor 1,257.8z
3128 JOHNSON WINE CO. Wine 589.4E
3129 EO. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. Liquor 660.92
3130 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. Liquor 654.8E
3131 HENNEPIN COUNTY Packer-Street dept 2,075.0(
3132 CHARLIE'S EXCEPTIONALE Meeting expense 39.00
3133 PETTY CASH Expenses 68•22
3134 BEER WHOLESALERS INC. Beer 4,003.5C
3135 COCA-COLA BOTTLING MIOWEST Mixes 426.4C
3136 OAY DISTRIBUTING .CO. Beer 2,475.7C
3137 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO. Beer 4,692.3;
3138 GOLD MEDAL BEVERAGE CO. Mixes 183.5(
3139 LEDING DISTRIBUTING Beer 3,637.0(
3140 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO. Mixes 462.9(
3141 ROUILLARD BEVERAGE CO., INC. Beer 1,081.B(
3142 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO. Beer 5,537.21
3143 ACRO-MINNESOTA, ItnC. Office supplies 84.9'
3144 ALL STEEL SOCCER GOALS, INC. Soccer goals-Park dept 3,598.0(
3145 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK & TRUST CO. Interest payment 234.7.,
3146 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION 800ks-Water dept 127.0(1
('47 EARL F. ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Warning signs 83.611
,,148 ARTEKA, INC. Refund-Utility bill 215.3:I
3149 AWARDS, INC. Supplies-Park dept 303.31
3150 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING Service-Shady Oak Phase II, Cardinal Creek, 532.01
Duck Lake Vista, Chatham Woods
3151 BROWN & CRIS, INC. Duck Lake Vista & Hiawatha Avenue 56,804.41
22g4 1
ay'
e two
September 16, 1980
3152 BROWN & CRIS, INC. Valley View Road (Phase I) $ 163,043.40,
3153 BROWN & CRIS, INC. High Trails Estates Utilities 38,137.99'
3154 BROWN PHOTO Film-Park dept & Police dept 23.16,
3155 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. Rock-Bikeway 6,071.07
3156 MARY BETH BUCKMAN Happenings July/August 1980 2766.45
25
3157 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE Subscription-Water dept
315E BURG & TJEPKES Signal Installation (TH 169 @ Vo-Tech &CSAH)1,741.25
3159 STEVE CALHOON Mileage 29.22,
3160>-; CASE POWER& EQUIPMENT •-- - Equipment rentali. - 1,200.0C. .
3161 CITY OF EDINA Tests T59.00'
3162 CHANHASSEN AUTO PARTS Equipment repair & parts 507.82;
3163 CHEMLAWN Lawn application-Water & Public Works dept 193.0C1
3164 CLASSES UNLIMITED Aerobic dance classes-Rec dept 144.00I
3165 CLUTCH & U-JOINT BURNSVILLE, INC. Fittings-Park dept 5.24
3166 LEIGH A. COMBS Mileage 5.17'
3167 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT, INC. Repaired air mask-Fire dept 7.401
3168 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC, INC. Chlorine crystals-Water dept 53.14
3169 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY Quicklime-Water dept 3,040.6'3
3170 WARD F. OAHLBERG Mileage 18.24
3171 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO. Meters-Water dept 5,385.4E
3172 DORHOLT PRINTING Office supplies 240.42
73 EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS Legal ads 787.9C
(.. /4 EDEN PRAIRIE SANITATION CO Service 70.5C
3175 PAUL EDWARDSON Community Band-Rec dept
3176 ELECTRIC SERVICE CO. Inspect sirens 396.0:
3177• ERNST HOUSE MOVERS Refund-Building dept 8B0.Oi
3178 W.J. EBERTZ Bryant Lake Project 1,761.9
3179 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. Supplies-Park dept 263.0C
31B0 FAIRVIEW COMMUNITY HOSPITALS Test 25.0:
3181 FEED-RITE CONTROLS, INC. Sulfate-Water dept 1,283.4;
31B2 FIRE CHIEF Subscription-Fire dept 15.0("
3183 FIRE ENGINEERING Subscription-Fire dept 12.0(
3184 FLYING CLOUD OIL CO. Diesel fuel 2,784.00
3185 FREEWAY FORKLIFT, INC. Forklift-Water dept 2,850.0(.
3186 FRONTIER LUMBER & HARDWARE Lumber-Park dept 6.8:
3187 VOID OUT CHECK
3188 GOPHER SIGN CO. Water system identification 348.2'• .
31B9 DALE GREEN CO. 81ack dirt 144.01'
3190 GROSS INDUSTRIAL SERVICES Service 58.7'1
3191 SHEILA HALEY Wages-Teen Work program 26.9I
3192 RICK HAUPT Wages-Teen Work program 18.91;
3193 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL CENTERS Tutition-Fire dept 50.01
3194 HONEYWELL INC. COMMERCIAL Repair air compressor-Water dept 3,192.2y
1 3195 HOPKINS DODGE SALES, INC. Equipment repair & parts 218.3
3196 HOPKINS PARTS CO. Parts-Street dept 13.41
3197 INGRAM EXCAVATING Hauling Rock-Bikeway 7,98B.O1
9B J & R RADIATOR CORP Equipment repair & parts 21.0
s199 KARULF HARDWARE, INC. Stapler, sprayer, metal primer-Street dept 626.8
bolts, axe, tub spout, spray cleaner, sand mix,
lock-Park dept, D-Con, paint, wire, nails, twine
Community service, lights, valve, ladder-Liquor
• Store, motor, rollers, paint brushes, hooks, tape,
la ch, battery, clamp lamps, screwdriver-Water dept
72A'
•
PaCi,: three
September 16, 1960
3200 MARY M. KENNY Mileage S 68.76
3201 KRAEMER'S HOME CENTER Spikes-Park dept, corks-Street dept, drill 96.36
bit-Water dept
3202 ROBERT A. LAMBERT Expenses 217.00
3203 LANG, PAULY & GREGERSON, LTD Legal service 6,329.B3
3204 LAYNE MINNESOTA COMPANY Equipment repair & parts-Water dept 163.01
3205 LEEF BROTHERS INC. Service 141.56
3206.,.•LOGIS Service 2,000.00
3207- LONG LAKE'FORD TRACTOR" Box scraper-Park/dept 25.74
3208 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, INC. Gutter broom-Street dept 197.46
3209 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIPMENT CO. Oxygen-Fire dept 23.67
3210 METROPOLITAN CLINIC OF COUNSELING Service 261.00
3211 METROPOLITAN SPORTS FACILITIES Bus Parking-Rec dept 10.00
3212 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL Sewer service 21,592.74
3213 MEYER BROS. DAIRY, INC. Milk-Day Camp 29.70
3214 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION Blacktop-Bikeway & Street dept 16,723.64
3215-- MIKE'S GLENROSE FLORAL Flowers-City Hall 20.70
3216 MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE CO. Employment ads-Police dept 113.28
3217 MINN ASSOC. OF ASSESSING OFFICERS Conference-Assessing dept 240.00
3218 MINNESOTA FIRE INC. Air tanks-Fire dept 186.00
3219 MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY Service 39.67
33 MODERN TIRE COMPANY Equipment repair & parts 98.38 "
221 MURPHY PLUMBING & HEATING Repair & parts-Water dept 73.90
3222 NODLAND ASSOCIATES, INC. Chatham Wood addition 31,669.79
3223 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY Service 4,291.69
3224 NORTHWESTERN BELL Service 2,254.09
3225 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK OF MPLS Bond payment 172,853.3E
3226 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO. Pop-Rec dept 11.00
3227 PIONEER CLUB Label Happenings 25.OG
3228 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN Partc-Park dept 16.9C
3229 PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL Sandwiches-Election judges 150.41
3230 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC. Service-Round Lake Utilities Phase II, 29,755.54,
High Trails Swr & Wtr, Valley View Road,
Franlo Road & Preserve Blvd, Shady Oak Ext.
70th Street Improve, Shady Oak Ind. Park.
Round Lake Estates-2nd Addition, Cardinal Creek
Estates, Rymarland Camp, Lake Idlewild Drainage
3231 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES Switch-Bikeway 15.71?
3232 PAUL ROGERS Discing Staring Lake 337.5C
3233 ST. PAUL POLICE PISTOL CLUB, INC. Supplies-Police dept 40.0Cf
3234 S.B.S. MECHNICAL Refund-Building dept 11.0C
3235 SCHMIDT SOD COMPANY Sod 75.0((
3236 SEARS Grinding discs-Park dept 13.9;
' 3237 SHADYWOOD TREE INJECTION, INC. Remove stumps-Community service 345.0(1
3236 SHAKOPEE VALLEY NEWS Employment ad-Police dept 62.81
"39 J. SHAW Refund-Rec dept 13.0'
.40 SMILEY GLOTTER ASSOC. Service-Community Center 17,220.6
3241 RUSSELL SMITH ASSOCIATES, INC. Service-Bikeway Cty Road 4 400.0
3242 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN ADVERTISER Employment ad-Police dept 28.6
3243 SPECIALTY SCREENING Lettering for new vehicles-Police dept 46.3
3244 SPORTS WORLD Supplies-Rec dept 1.9
3245 EMMETT STARK Community Band-Rec dept 250.0
22.97
PBye four
September 16, 1980
3246 NATHANA STENEMAN Mileage 5.17.
3247 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CO. Equipment repair & Parts 18.021
3248 SUN NEWSPAPERS Employment ad-Police dept 47.50!
3249 E.A. SWEEN COMPANY Concession sandwiches 32.66!
3250 CARRIE TIETZ Minutes-Park & Rec dept 44.00!
3251 DAN THOMPSON TENNIS SCHOOLS Tennis Instructor 199.50
3252 ORRIN THOMPSON HOMES Refund-Building dept 1 478.00,
3253.,;, ;TOWNS EDGE FORD, INC.;.,,. Equipment repair & parts 321.28
3254' 'WAYNE fRAASETH ' - Repair water softner - " '39.95
3255 TURNKEY MATERIAL HANDLING, INC. Cabinet, ladder, lock-Water dept 756.84'
3256 TYPE HOUSE + DURAGRAPH Supplies-Park dept 18.3C.
3257 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Equipment rental-Fire dept 6.75,
3258 UNIVERISTY OF WISCONSIN-EXT. Registration fee-Park dept 200.00,
3259 VAN WATERS & ROGERS Chlorine-Water dept 225.65!
3260 VILLAGE CHEVROLET Supplies-Street dept .561
3261 VINCENT BRASS & ALUMINUM CO. Steel sheet-Engineering dept 41.3E
3262 FRED VOGT & CO. Refund-Building dept 13.5Ci
3263 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment repair & parts-Sewer dept 557.7C!
3264 WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY Equipment repair & parts-Water dept 677.871
3265 SANDRA WERTS August expenses 125.151
3266 WHOLESALE LIGHTING, INC. Spot lights-Water dept 45.541
( 7 XEROX CORPORATION Service 219.541
3268 ZIEGLER INC. Switch 12.61
3269 JANELLE ANDERSON Election judge 49.50
3270 ADELINE M: BRAMWELL Election judge. 42.75
3271 JOY BREKKE Election judge 52.5C
3272 MARGARET M. BYE Election judge 49.5C
3273 JOANN CARLIN Election judge 49.5C.
3274 GRACE B. CARMODY Election judge 42.7E
3275 RUTH CHARCHIAN Election judge 4.5C
3276 MILDRED CLARK Election judge 44.2E
3277 ROSEMARY C. DYSINGER Election judge 50.25
3278 LORETTA M. ELLISON Election judge 59.2E
3279 PIERRY FORSTER Election judge 4.5C
3280 BETTY L. FRITZ Election judge 49.5(
3281 VIRGINIA K. GARTNER Election judge 49.5(
3282 JINNY GIBSON. Election judge 57.0(
3283 CHERYL GLISCZINSKI Election judge 50.2E
3284 BARBARA HIGGINS.: Election judge 50.2E
3285 SHIRLEY JELLISON Election judge 49.5(,
32B6 BARB JOHNSON Election judge 49.5(!
3287 DORIS JOHNSON Election judge 57.0E
3288 VI JOHNSON Election judge 49.5d
3289 DELORES KLEIN Election judge 51.7E
3290 FLORENCE KRAL Election judge 50.211
1'91 SUE LANE Election judge 58.5!
',-92 SHARON LEVITT Election judge 49.5
3293 SHARON LYNCH Election judge 50.2
3294 SUZANNE S. MARTH Election judge 44.2`
3295 RUTH MITAL Election judge 49.5
3296 MARION NESBITT Election judge 50.2
3297 ANN GAY PARKER Election judge 61.0'
e,nA 1'
PLye five
September 16, 1980
3298 BERNADETTE PLOUMEN Election judge 38.25
3299 GLORIA POND Election judge 50.25
3300 LORRAINE BATHS Election judge 50.25
3301 EVELYN ROGERS Election judge 49.50
3302 MARY UPTON Election judge 49.50.
3303 BARBARA VANDERPLOEG Election judge__ 42.75.
3304 BARBARA.ANN WALKER Election judge 49.50
3305�, _EONA WALKER Election judge_ 64.00
3306 GRETTA ZUMBURGE Election judge 49.5C
3307 BRW Service-Lake Eden Park 767.43
3308 ST. REGIS PAPER COMPANY Lumber-Bikeway 1,668.3C
3309 VALLEY EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment rental 1.850.00
TOTAL $722,463.04
•
•
•
•
it^
•
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GELCO FIRST ADDITION
1. Owner/Developer involved:
The owner of the land included in the preliminary plat
is Gelco Corporation, One Gelco Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota
55344.
2. Proposed Use and Sale of Lots:
•
At the present time, the main offices of Gelco Corporation
are located on the land included in the preliminary plat. Due 2
to rapid growth, Gelco Corporation is presently constructing 1
a second office building on the land which will house additional
administrative staff and is also constructing additional parking
facilities to serve these employees. Gelco Corporation plans to
construct additional office space and parking in the future to
accommodate future growth. The precise location and dimensions
of these future facilities are still uncertain.
Gelco Corporation does not plan to sell any of the lots.
However, each new facility and related parking area will be
mortgaged individually to obtain construction financing. In
fact, accommodating present and future construction financing
is the primary reason for the unusual lot configuration depicted
on the preliminary plat.
3. Existing Zoning.
The existing zoning for the Gelco Corporation property is
Office District (OFC).
t
4. County Half-Section:
Please find attached the county map which depicts surround-
ing land-use and nearby property owners.
5. Variances Requested.
Gelco Corporation will require the following variances
for the following lots:
Variance Lot
Parking not on same parcel Block 1, Lots 2&. 3
Block 2, Lot 1
Set back Block 1, Lot 2
Block 3, Lots 1-5
Lot size Block 3, Lot 2
Floor Area Ratio Block 1, Lots1 & 2
Submitted by:
Pamela J. Moret
Leonard, Street and Deinard
1200 National City Bank Bldg.
510 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
1
•
23U2- -2- , pic-
i•g! I r. w.
o • s S Y '! 1 • lc.'
la
I . I i
R ... ......'.. .i '—iu.r.a t ..o.nw+. J 7 .
D.
Z j
W • 1 it. .
!' 1 • a
N • s` •
•
N
i.
`` . O Xi �` III 4. .•
V.7 r
i :�1•;
• .+ •f. i.
• ' = z '
i e a s ,: F a- a
{
ry� i O. . ..
No r. �_-
I. r I. i j :i' • Z
. ii . ..
e.
ti t 2 -CC/ . l..
MEMO • .
TO: Planning Ccmnission
FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
( DATE: June 4, 1930
PROJECT: GELCD CDRP0RATIOW PLATTING ¢
APPLICANT: Gelco Corporation
REQUEST: Preliminary platting as a part of the PUD Development (
Stage Approval
• LOCATION: South of West 78th Street and 1-494, West of Co.Rd.18, i.
and bounded on the South by Anderson Lakes
t
3
BACKGROUND tl
In August of 1978 Gelco Corporation received PUD Concept plan approval }
and zoning for Stages II through V of their office park. That plan is j
attached to this report. ,
PRESENT REQUEST E
Gelco's current request, also as part of the Development Stage of the PUD,
• is to preliminary plat their entire 60 acre parcel (42 acres for office
and 18 acres to be deeded to the City), to split their building , driving,
and parking areas into separate lots and outlots according to building
( phases to facilitate separate mortgages.
Gelco represents that it is their intention to retain all of the land
and future buildings within their ownership.
Technically, the way in which the lots are drawn would create a conflict
with certain provisions of Ordinance 135(parking for a building must he
provided on the same lot as the building and parking must be 10 feet from
a lot line). However, setbacks Fran the peripheral lot lines are correct,
Gelco will be providing appropriate access and egress easements for the
parcels, and the platting is all being done in conformance with the overall
Planned Unit Development.
The parking for'the building currently under construction will be provided
at grade over the rest of the land to the west. Subsequent phases will
require provision of parking in ramps above the Stage lI parking.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff reconm:ends approval of the PUD Development Stage and
Preliminary Plat for Gelco Corporation subject to the following:
1). A detailed landscaping plan must be submitted for review and approval
( prior to final plat approval which will delineate landscaping as.
required for Phase 11 parking and building in the Sept.5,1973 Aereement.
2). The necessary ravers created by this preliminary plat should be grantcd
as a part of the PUD Development Stele approval. parcels
t
3). Copies of the easement documents governing access between I•
should be submitted to the City Attorney for review prior to beat
•
•
•• . 1
• .
. .
t. . --' '',_ • •••• ii). 11 ` 1
, . • _., .• i I-
. . . .
..e. • ;
. . ., ._...
. • •
__... ) ) 1 • . .
•
• . . . I LAI,
. . 1.c:4' •'.','' \ .11,t-
et . 4/ i.. .•,7'. \ •
. .
• • - ((r.7° ' l' •;' I/s.,..).11
. •
• . :: li:•/,/,, \ r— \
\%. /1 ‘ ••• • • . • • ,4 6 sV‘ \ /'-.)1
. • : /A: :.//47.1.!, ‘e,‘,/ ;IV\'1. 11 .\' . ,
• ,,
. ' I \•,1 '..v.N.)-'• /. L j)-- .
. • N„ •
. \ '''\.‘•;• s. r.
/•ett, q,../•:.. / --44 %:" \ t,
• z'•;•z. \ "t. 721 ,,,_ ' .,..,':;:7 'io\
r .
,..-•.:4 \"1/4,•.;is,
I I:
.., :
1,. .
• _
• •-.X.?,.(°I. v y 6 1,-. - --------ill •
. •,..,
. .
..; .7,, . • ._6..3a
, ticxj) • • . • ,.., ; ‘ ic—-;7 .-7... z/\7",•,.----—' ,4't
„......."
. ___, ,. ,-/-:\,,f..•.‘4>i,;:Ll../..),... ?I.)
-4 tti •
Z ;
C • aP /:':'''// ,!- ---._ 7. ,i'' Y.:\..i; 11:[-fYil( •• i
Z ' ••••••:/-k,//4 ‹; , I
;';) '1 I ;7,1r . . . . . . •.,,,,
D k;. ::.::".:`'../ .. , .,_ A • i 7i ' 1) P?I‘ 11 t•4 ,
.-' ( . / i) ')1 •,,
rt I
..-• .
';.1• ih .(\<‘.7\\, •''': .. ; ...i-.0
. ;Iv /,\..s-N, . \--- \i' •\ , .." ..• :. • 0 1
,....-( ...)/•-.!.(.''s\,' ..;:-..--• / / I I/ t i
, -• ,.• ,•-./ ..,,/ __ I., _ ..„
r,I.L
fs1 1 • . Vi.-...---111., .. , s• •,,,i _P.1130.00 ‘ I c i: z;
•
--;---
' i, V
.
• • \I l'6..,/, / i' -,////z./. / 14,47( . .
. ,
MINUTES
•
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION approved
{ Monday, June 9, 1980 7:30 PM City Hall
MEMBERS PRESENT: Virginia Gartner,n William BMatthew Levitt, GeorgeBentley,earman, Liz Retterath, Grant Sutliff,Hakon Torjesen
STAFF PRESENT: Chris Enger, Director Planning; Jean Johnson, Assistant Planner
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Retterath inovea, Sutliff seconded, to approve the agenda as submitted.
Motion carried unanimously. •
II. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF MAY 12, 1980 •
P.2,Motion 1, add- -Bentley abstained because of past involvement in
litigation against the developer).
Bentley moved, Gartner seconded, to approve the minutes as amended.
Motion carried 6:0:1 with Torjesen abstaining.
III. MEMBERS REPORTS
Retterath welcomed Hakon Torjesen back from his leave of absence.
IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
DEER CREEK PUD APiD REZONING, by T.G.C. Development, Inc. Request
Tr PUD concept approval on 80 acres for single family, townhouse
quadraminiums, and commercial use; rezoning from Rural to RM 2.5
preliminary plat approval, and approval of an Environmental
•
Assessment Worksheet. Located East of Mitchell Road, South of
Old Farm Quads, and North of Ridgewood West. A continued public hearing.
Motion
Gartner moved, Retterath seconded, to codtinue the Dee-k Creek
public hearing to June 23 as requested by the proponent.
Motion carried unanimously.
B. SUPERAMERICA STATION, at Co.Rd.4/TH 5. Request to rezone 1.3 acres
from Plan Study to Highway Commercial for construction of a convenience
store and gas station. Located in the Southwest corner of TH 5 and
•
Co.Rd. 4. A continued public meeting.
Motion
Retterath moved, Gartner seconded to continue the Superanherica
item to the July 14 meeting as requested by the proponent.
Motion carried unanimously.
C. GELCO F1RST ADDITION, by Gcico Corporation. Request for PUD
Development Stage approval to preliminary plat the 60 acre Gelco
PUD into 9 lots and 10 outlots. Located north of Anderson Lakes
and South of 1-494 and West 78th Street. A public hearing.
The Planner informed the Commission the plat request depicting building,
• parking and access areas upon land zoned Office is to facilitate
mortgaging for construction purposes. He stated that presently building
number 2 is under construction. The Planner then reviewed the staff
report recomuncndations.
•
approved
Minutes-Planning Commission -2- June 9, 1980
Gelco First Addition, continued
Emerson Greenberg, Gelco Corporation, reinterated the need for the plat to
allow separate mortgaging of construction of the approved phases.
Levitt inquired if all land within the plat is zoned Office. The Planner
replied affirmative, adding that also depicted on the plat plan is land
which is zoned Public around the lake.
Fred Rosenblatt , legal counsel,Gelco Corporation, stated that the legal
description of land conveyed to the City is separate from the plat legal.
Levitt asked if two buildings are contemplated upon Lot 1, Block 2.
• Rosenblat replied that at this time it appeared sensible to plat the area
only into 1 lot until it is known whether one or two buildings will he
constructed. He informed the Commission that as part of the PUD and zoning
agreement, each building phase plan must return for City approval.
Levitt inquired if the plat as proposed with off site parking and cross easements
would be functional if Gelco sells one or more buildings. The Planner replied
the area could still function as an office park if a building is sold because
easements for access and parking are outlined similar to what has been done
in other communities.
•
Bentley stated he is uncomfortable making a recommendation on off site parking
t as it could set a precendent.
Emerson Greenberg stated that the plat proposed conforms to the City's
previous approvals on the overall site.
Bearman asked if there were other parties than Gelco and the bank to the
mortgage. Emerson Greenberg replied negative.
Bearman asked if anyone in the audience had questions or comments. None
were raised.
. Motion 1
Levitt moved, Gartner seconded, to close the public hearing on the Gelco
First Addition. Motion carried unanimously.
' Motion 2
Levitt moved, Gartner seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of
the preliminary plat dated May 19, 1980 as per the staff report of June
4, 1980. Motion carried unanimously.
D. ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER, by Eden Prairie Real
Estate Investment Corpora lion Request forPUU concept approval , rezoning
from Rural to C-Com, and preliminary plat approval. Located in the Southwest
corner of US 169 and Anderson Lakes Parkway. A public hearing.
Dick Kr•ier, Westwood Planning & Engineering, reviewed the site location, past
meetings with neighborhood, site character, location of buildings, proposed
access points, landscaping,and berm ing,as they are outlined in the submission
material. Mr. Krier then presented the Commission with copies of the project's
proposed design standards which will control building design, lighting,
Planting material. sianaer. etc. 13a-FY 1:1W7
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.R00-114
•
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF GELCO FIRST ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Gelco First Addition
dated May 191980 , a copy of which is attached hereto and amended
as follows:
is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie
Zoning and Platting ordinances and amendments thereto and is herein
approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the _day of
19 .
a fgang H. Penzel, Mayor
Sohn D. Frane, City Clerk
SEAL
1
�anR -w-tf-
MEMORANDUM
•
TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
FROM: Bob Lambert, Oirector of Community Services 1"4
DATE: Augsut 14, 1980
SUBJECT: Purgatory/Major Center Open Space Study Proposed by Don Brauer
Mr. Don Brauer has proposed that all of the property owners around the
Purgatory/Major Center Open Space Area pay for a basic site and inventory
. and analysis of that area and schematic development plans and preliminary
development cost estimates for the common or future public (floodplain)
area. Mr. Brauer is requesting that the City retain the consultants and
administer the process.
The study Mr. Brauer suggests makes a great deal of sense not only for the
landowners, but for the City. It would be much easier to pldn adjacent land
uses, road systems, trail systems and public open space requirements if the
City and the adjacent landowners are aware of and agree to some type of concept
plan for development of that area.
I do have some concerns with the second objective listed on page 2 "request a
change in the floodplain level from 824 to 821 and revise encroachment policies
proportionally". If it is assumed going into the study that the 821 is the boundary
for the future public open space area, the final concept plan might look quite
different from one that assumed the 824 (the existing floodplain level)
as the boundary.
I would be more comfortable with a study that completed a basic site inventory
and analysis of the area and prepared a schematic concept development plan
based on the inventory and analysis rather having an objective of lowering
the floodplain.
I do not wish to imply one way or another at this time that I am in favor of keeping
the floodplain level at 824 or lowering it to 821. I would not make a recommend-
ation regarding this until the study of this area is completed and until a
study of the effect of lowering the floodplain on Staring Lake is completed.
Mr. Brauer's study will not address the effect of the lowering on Staring Lake.
This would have a very significant effect on Staring Lake. A good portion of
the shoreline including the Senior Center would undoubtedly be under water during
the spring of the year and after heavy rains, without some holding pond design
to take up the "bounce" that would most surely occur if the floodplain in the
Major Center Area is reduced.
I feel the large open space area adjacent to the Major Center Area is a highly
visible resource that should be developed to its best potential whether for golf
and field games or as a wildlife management area. However, the consequence
of this development should not be detrimental to another valuable resource further
down stream.
Staff would recomnend approval of the study subject to the Watershed District
completing a study of the effect of lowering the floodplain on Staring take and
Staring Lake Park and eliminating objective number 2.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: September 11, 1980
SUBJECT: Red Rock Park Acquisition
In early August, 'staff informed the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources.
Commission and the City Council that the City had purchased two of the three
parks that were to be acquired with the Park Bond Referendum funds. The
remaining park to be purchased was Red Rock Park. Staff indicated that the
City was receiving pressure from adjacent residents for development of the
park. However, Mr. Virgil Siefert, owner of the 14 acre parcel, was not
interested in selling at this time due to the uncertainty of the status of
the property that he had sold to developers.
At the August 5 meeting, the City Council continued this item to the September
16 Council meeting and directed staff to look at alternate sites in the area
that might be used in place of Mr. Siefert's. At that meeting, Mr. Siefert
indicated that he should have additional information on his other property by
August 20.
When reviewing the adjacent properties to look at alternative sites for a
neighborhood park to serve the Red Rock Neighborhood, the attached map shows
that the only unplatted property remaining in this neighborhood is to the
southwest. This land is extremely hilly and not conducive to developing
neighborhood parks that require fairly flat spaces for development of active
use areas. The only acceptable site is indicated by the star just east of
Red Rock Lake. As the map indicated, this park would be located on the fringe
of the half mile service area of the Red Rock Neighborhood. We find ourselves
in this situation because since 1975 everyone has accepted the Red Rock Park
site as the area that would be developed as the neighborhood park to serve this
area. In fact, there are several existing paths that have been required of
developers that lead to this proposed park site from the north and the west.
The City has required dedicated park property, approximately 6 acres, that borders
the north and west boundaries of this park site. The sitc itself is fairly flat
and the majority of it is undevelopable for buildings but will be satisfactory
for park use.
The property owner indicates that our appraisal is far below an acceptable selling
price and he has brought up good points that leads staff, at least, to believe
the City should negotiate at a considerably higher price. Even if this property
had to go to condemnation it certainly would still be cheaper than purchasing
the alternate sitc located on the peninsula of Red Rock Lake. We have an appraisal
of that park site at $15,000 per acre.
The staff would like to have that property acquired by early next spring
so that we could bid for grading and construction in late winter to obtain
the best bids for development.
BL:md .
2310
qg
•
4. MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: September 11, 1980
SUBJECT: Hidden:Ponds`APar Plan-Security Fence Costs e; - -F *a ns
I •
At the August 19 meeting, the City Council approved the Hidden Ponds Park
plan and considered a request from Mr. Paulson, the adjacent neighbor, to
constructing a security fence along the park eastern border in an attempt
to effectively keep children out of the orchard on Mr. Paulson's property.
Staff estimates that a minimum of 600 lineal feet of fence is required to
effectively restrict the public from encroachment on to Mr. Paulson's
property where the commerical orchard is located. The staff has contacted
three local chain link fence contractors. The quotes are as follows:
Future Fence Co. 5 foot chain length fence $3,263
8 feet $4,459
10 feet $5,498
Century Fence 5 feet $3,300
8 feet $4,500
10 feet $7,200 �.
Kibbey Engineering 5 feet $4,085
8 feet $5,900
10 feet $7,130
The staff recommendation was to wait to see if there is a problem before
constructing the fence. The City Council requested staff to provide cost
information before making a final decision on whether this fence would be
constructed with the initial park development.
BL:md
72[�
•
4
{
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THRU: ..• Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
FIt01�s Bob'l mbert 'Director of-Community Services h'-
DATE: September 11, 1980 1
SUBJECT: Railroad Right-of-Way Appraisal
d
The City Council authorized condemnation of the bike trail right-of-way
across the Chicago Northwestern right-of-way on County Road 4. The City
has secured an appraisal estimating the loss to the railroad at $250.
Staff requested the City Council to approve this appraisal so city staff
might make an offer to the railroad for $250 for the purchase of that
bike trail tight-of-way.
( BL:Md
•
•
2312
f
OM 000.0100
LAW erne••
LAND. PAULY • ORLOCROON, LTD.
( MOM IDS O•NTAN
NINNOA►OLIO.MI •0.L011
IIR••RT I.LAND
A.►AULY
IIW10 M. S.
R.TMOMA• IL S.
N 10NAR0 I.UO.OW •
L AWI1•N0•.1.UROOLUNO August 22, 1980
•
Mr. Cax2 Jullie and
:MX. Robert Lambert...,
' City of Eden Prairie F
8950 Eden Prairie Rd. '
Eden Prairie, MN 55343
Res City of Eden Prairie vs. Chicago and Northwestern
• Transportation Company
Gentlemen:
Enclosed please find a copy of Russell Smith Associates,
Inc.'s appraisal report on the effect of the taking of the right-
of-way for the hikeway/bikewaY trail across the railroad property
on County Road 4. Also enclosed is Russell epsis is Associates,invoice
i
this report. Please have the City pay
Inc. directly on this invoice.
The appraisal is submitted for your review. If you find .
- it to be satisfactory, we should have the matter brought before
the council's attention at its next meeting for
spproval of not hesitate e
appraisal. If you have any questions, please
d• to call me.
Very truly yours, .
LAND, p D GREGERSON, D.
B •
ch rd F. Ro ow
RFR:ps
Enclosure i
23 1S
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services '744
DATE:. ••: September 10, 1980
• SUBJECT: Request From Lawrence Heinen regarding tax for"reited property •
Attached to this memo is a letter from Thomas Dougherty representing Mr.
and Mrs. Lawrence Heinen, 9840 Bennett Place, Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
This letter outlines the background of the Heinen's purchase of a parcel
encompassed within parcel No. 2010 that was forfeited to the State of
Minnesota for delinquency in the payment of real estate taxes. Subsequently,
the City of Eden Prairie applied to Hennepin County for conveyance of this
parcel through the tax forfeited land procedures for park property.
it it obvious that Mr. Heinen intended to pay taxes on all of his property
for the length of time that he has owned it. Staff recommends that the
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and the City Council
consider withdrawing the application for conveyance of this tax forfeited
parcel so that Mr. and Mrs. Heinen may repurchase this parcel. •
BL:md
•
•
aaw
MAHONEY, DOUGHERTY AND MAHONEY
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS
-..ICMAR6 P.11 801 PARK AVENUE
TMONAI E.DOUGHERTY MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 55404
Jima.M.M �� OF
KENNETM GLt SOH 1 613 1 113 5.5663 y6SNON J.SONwclotR
DMA A.LINOMIN
OAR[C.RIOTER September 5, 1980 O.P.NANONtT{N/O•INtI
Q.J.MAHONEY Iltf[.10t1
Parana I.N0.6
PATRICK J.IIAVT[R
Mr. Roger K. Ulstad •
City Manager
City rf Eden Prairie;
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55436
Dear Mr. Ulstad:
At the request of Mr. and Mrs. Lawrence E. Heinen, I am
writing this letter to outline for you the background of their pur-
chase of certain real estate in the City of Eden Prairie, which for
the purposes of brevity, will hereafter be referred to as Plat No.
56820, Parcels Nos. 2200, 2010 and 2420. Mr. and Mrs. Heinen have
just recently become aware that the land encompassed within Parcel
No. 2010 has been forfeited to the State of Minnesota for delinquency
in the payment of real estate taxes and that the City of Eden Prairie
has made application to Hennepin County for conveyance of tax for-
feited lands to it.
Prior to June of 1972, the entire tract of land encompassed
within Plats Nos. 2200, 2010 and 2420 were owned of record by Ellen
Henry. On June 5, 1972, Ellen Henry entered into a Contract for
Deed with Mr. Stephen F. Rowland, which Contract for Deed covered
the entire tract of land encompassed within Parcels Nos. 2200, 2010
and 2420. This Contract for Deed was not recorded and Ellen Henry
remained the record owner, and presumably continued to receive the
tax statements for all of these parcels.
On March 12, 1973, Mr. and Mrs. Heinen entered into a
Contract for Deed with Mr. Rowland for the purchase of a part of
that entire tract. The part purchased by Mr. and Mrs. Heinen under
the Contract for Deed at that time were the tracts of land covered
by Parcels Nos. 2200 and 2420 and also part of Parcel No. 2010.
This Contract for Deed was not recorded and again Ellen Henry re-
mained the record owner.
In November of 1973, Mr. and Mrs. Heinen acquired by
Warranty Deed that tract of land described by Parcel No. 2200.
At that time they built a home on this parcel, which is commonly
known and described as 9840 Bennett Place, Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
2315
I
MAHONEY.DOUGHERTY AND MAHONEY
September 5, 1980 •
Page 2
At the same time Mr. and Mrs. Heinen constructed a horse stable
on that part of Parcel No. 2010, which was being purchased under
a Contract for Deed from Rowland and also fenced in a part of Par-
cel No. 2010 for a pasture area for horses owned by them.
In 1976, Mr. and Mrs. Heinen entered into another Contract
for Deed with Stephen W. Rowland for the purchase of the balance of
this entire tract of land which was the remaining part of Parcel
No. 2010. This Contract for Deed again was not recorded and the •
record owner continued to be Ellen Henry. At the time that Mr. i;-
Heinen entered into this Contract for Deed with Mr. Rowland, he was
not aware that there were any unpaid real estate taxes on Parcel
No. 2010. Mr. Heinen has always received and paid the taxes covering
the land encompassed within Plats No. 2200 and 2420. Neither Mr.
or Mrs. Heinen were ever aware that Parcel No. 2010 was being taxed
by a separate tax statement. Apparently all of the real estate
tax statements for Parcel No. 2010 were forwarded to either Ellen
Henry or to Stephen W. Rowland. However, they were never forwarded
by either of the said Ellen Henry or Stephen W. Rowland to Mr.
Heinen.
It was not until late August of 1980, as part of Mr.
Heinen's work in developing this entire tract of land as Creek-
view Estates, that he became aware that there was any real estate
tax delinquencies on Parcel No. 2010. On that occasion Mr. Heinen
commenced an investigation of this matter and learned for the first
time that there were delinquent.real estate taxes on this Parcel
No. 2010 which dated back to 1975 and that an application had been
filed by your City to acquire title to this land.
Mr. Heinen has been working with the City of Eden Prairie
since August of 1978 in an attempt to plat this entire tract of
land, that is Parcels Nos. 2200, 2010 and 2420 in a real estate
development known as Creekview Estates. Since August of 1980, Mr.
Heinen has had approximately 25 meetings with various officials of
the City of Eden Prairie, including the members of the City Council,
Planning Commission, and Park and Recreation Committee in the City
Engineer's Office in connection with his development of this entire
tract of land. If Mr. and Mrs. Heinen had known of the existence
of this tax delinquency, they would, of course, immediately have
paid any default. Neither Mr. or Mrs. Heinen were ever aware or
had been notified in any manner of this tax delinquency or of the
forfeiture of this land to the State for non-payment of taxes. You
will note that on Exhibit No. 1, which is attached to the City's
Application to Hennepin County for conveyance of tax forfeited
lands, that this Parcel No. 2010 is referred to as 9820 Bennett
Place. In fact, there is no 9820 Bennett Place. The only building
23/(
•
MAHONEY.DOUGHERTY AND MAHONEY
September 5, 1980
Page 3
on those premises is the stable constructed by Mr. Heinen. Mr.
Heinen's home is adjacent to this land, and that address is 9840
Bennett Place.
Mr. Heinen has contacted the appropriate officials at
Hennepin County concerning this matter, and these officials have
• indicated that if your City would advise Hennepin County that
you are'withdrawing your application for conveyance of tax-for-
•
feited land in respect to this Parcel No. 2010, that Hennepin
County would allow Mr. ani' Mrs'. Heinen to re-purchase.this-tax
forfeited land.
On behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Heinen, I respectfully request
- that the City of Eden Prairie does do advise Hennepin County that
it is withdrawing its application for this parcel of tax forfeited
land.
• Very truly.yours;
MAHO , DOUG R and MEY
omas E. ou er
TED/joo
t
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
TOUR: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services' .-.
DATE: September 11, 1980
SUBJRCT: Resolution No.-80477 Authorizing Filing-of'Application for
LAWCON Funds
Staff requests the City Council to approve Resolution No. 80-177 Authorizing
Staff to File an Application for a 1981 LAWCON Grant for Parcel No. 3 of
Miller Park on Mitchell Lake. The City has received LAWCON funding assistance
on acquisition of Parcels 1 and 2. Parcel No. 3 is the last parcel containing
lakeshore frontage. The parcel acquisition costs will be approximately
$150,000. The initial ranking of this project is third for cities of this
size. Therefore, the City should receive approximately $75,000 in LAWCON
funds and $37,.000 in LCMR funds toward the purchase of this $150,000 parcel.
After this purchase is completed, the City will only owe approximately $31,800
on this 73 acre community park site.
BL:md
•
42311 -
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 80-177
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AUTHORIZING FILING OF APPLICATION FOR
GRANTS TO ACQUIRE PARKLAND UNDER THE PROVISION OF THE FEDERAL LAND AND WATER
CONSERVATION FUND ACT AND THE STATE NATURAL RESOURCES FUND
WHEREAS, the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act and the State Natural
Resources Fund provides for tha making of grants to assit local public bodies
in the acquisition and development of outdoor recreation projects, and
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie desires to acquire certain land known .--
as Miller Park on Mitchell Lake, which land is to be held and used for permanent
open space, and
WHEREAS, Title VI of the Civil Right Act of 1964 P. L. 88-354 (1964) and
of the regulations promulgated pursuant to such Act by the Secretary of the
Interior and contained in 43 C. F. R. 17 effectuating that title, provides that
no person shall be discriminate against because of race, color or national
origin in the use of the land acquired and/or developed, and •
WHEREAS, it is estimated—that the cost of acquiring the third portion of
this open space area shall be $150,000.
{ NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie
1. That an application be made to the Office of Local and Urban Affairs
of the State Planning Agency for a grant from the Land and Water
Conservation Fund as amended in 1965 for an amount presently estimated
to be $75,000 and the applicant will pay the balance of the cost from
other funds available to it.
2. That an application be made to the Office of Local and Urban Affairs
of the State Planning Agency for a grant from the Natural Resource
Fund (Minnesota Laws 1973, Chapter 7, Section 43, Subd. 2, Paragraph
G) for an amount presently estimated to be $37,500 and the applicant
•
will pay the balance of the costs from other funds available to it.
3. That the Director of Community Services, City of Eden Prairie is hereby
authorized and directed to execute and to file such applications with
the State of Minnesota Office of Land and Urban Affairs and the State
Planning Agency, and to provide additional information and to furnish
such documents as may be required by said Agency to execute such contracts
• as are required by said Agency and to act as the authorized correspondent
of the Applicant.
4. That the proposed acquisition and development is in accordance with
the plans for the allocation of land for open space use, and that
should said grant be made, the applicant will acquire, develop and
retain said land for uses designated in said application and approved
by the Office of Local and Urban Affairs from the H.C.R.S.
0319
•
5. That the Unitied States of America and the State of Minnesota be, and
they hereby are, assured of full compensation by the Applicant with
the regulations of the Department of Interior, effectuating Title
VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 16th day
of September, 1980.
,. Wolfgang.H. Fenzel, Mayor•
ATTEST:
John D. Frame, Clerk SEAL
•
\.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
•
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: September 11, 1980
• SUBJECT: Bids for Hidden Ponds and Creekwood Parks
On September 11, 1980, at 10 A.M. bids for grading for Hidden Ponds and •
Creekwood Park improvements were opened at City Hall. The following bids
were received:
1. Bieck Excavating $64,492.14
2. St. Louis Park Landscaping $47,574.69
3. Busse Construction $42,009.95
4. W. J. Ebertz Excavating $35,981.58
S. Brown and Cris $28,980.26
Staff recommends the City Council award the bid for grading of Hidden Ponds
and Creekwood Park to Brown and Cris for the low bid of $28,980.26.
BL:Md
232 I
City Council Minutes - 9 - iues.,nugust a, iynu
4. Round Lake Irrigation (continued)
Osterholt stated he would feel more comfortable waiting for the final
figures on the Community Center building to see if there are any excess
monies available to be used for an irrigation system.
•
This item was continued to either the first or second Council meeting
in October, 1980. ---•-•�--•... --
5. Red Rock Park - Update •
Director of Community Services•Lambert spoke to his memo dated July 23,
1980. Lambert felt it was essential to bring the problem with the acquisitior
of the Red Rock Park before the Council sometime this summer. The same .
memo was forwarded to the Parks, Recreation& Natural Resources Commission
on August 4th and the Commission decided to take action. Their recommenda-
tion was that if the City couldn't negotiate for acquisition of the park
before the end of this year, that we enter into condemnation on the parcel.
Lambert added more and more development is being approved around the park
and we can't wait much longer.
Mr. Virgil Seifert, owner of the 14 acre parcel, stated the problem is the
developer he sold to two years ago is putting him off which makes him un-
certain just when he would want to sell the park land. The developer who
bought the land is in default right now, and there is a very good chance Mr.
Seifert may get the property back a second time. Mr. Seifert added he
should have a decision from the developerby_August20, 1980.
Osterholt asked Mr. Seifert if he would be interested in the City's offer?
Mr. Seifert stated he expects to sell the land eventually; however, was
insulted with the appraisal obtained by the City as the property was sold
8 years ago for $3,700.00 an acre,and has been assessed for the last 8 years
at $3,500,00 an acre. The City's appraisal is only for $2,000.00 an acre.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to continue this item to
the September 16, 1980 Council meeting, and to direct staff to look at
alternative sites which might be used in place of Mr. Seifert's. Motion
carried unanimously.
6. Historic Parks
Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to his memo dated June 26, 1980
on City Historical Parks. Lambert explained he took this item to the
Parks, Recration & Natural Resources Commission on August 4th. The Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Commission suggested that a joint meeting
be held with the City Council and the Historical & Cultural Commission.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to set a joint meeting for
the City Council to meet with the Historical & Cultural Commission and
the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission to tour the Grill
house on October 2, 1980 at 6:30 PM. Motion carried unanimously.
d23
v ek
I
EID s
1 i
,• t0 ly
. -' //// FlREL a!!.. CITY- R'I t PYE4c lAiETY —1 ,•��N�q •`sI / - • 1R�NNEEe •` ,,�`•
ce
•
ISO ROCK RD � ,,Ir id✓tt=i• '`���` A !ha IW" - ' CENTER
T to 1 *+M- u • 4e, .1- , •--� -IWA1-111 1
iI
11.,;� S _spai " . � I,"
_- . •I�•..` k` ..-wcl v, 1
� G_.t ....R • RED _ _ oil. ��`•1 A..VA n �
/
,•i ,t.�fi x
t.,.\ N
_ROCK ~73 • 4� • • - 1
pi
I . %, (te. .
q 2. ..T oF
UFI CI. Wulf]
0 �-
f
1----a‹...)4D.
Dv 40 w ti STARING - RI:Q Nti
OLAKE
7-1,-\TR22w ------
Ed,. -
iqa y, r)n,:
•
• C}e.� - - - • f yr�iu..,
.c) - . . .
J1 T ,,
T MN R t2* Flying Claud
lit" AIFpo►1
rip.; MAC
Sept. 16; 1980.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R80-182
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID
I.C. 51-353A e.
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following
improvements: •
v --
I.C. 51-353A, Wearing Course on
Streets in Hipps Mitchell Heights 4th Addition
bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids
received are shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and
WHEREAS, the Ciyt Engineer recommends award of contract to Bury &
Carlson, inc. as the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as
follows:
The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to
enter into a contract with 8ury & Carlson, Inc. in the name of
the City-of--Eden Prairie in the amount of $18,027.50 in accord-
ance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the Council"
and on file in the office of the City Engineer.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
•
ATTEST: • SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
{
a32y . - _ _ . .
P SUMMARY OF BIDS
PROJECT: I.C. 51-353A, Wearing Course - Hipp's Mitchell Hts 4th
BIDS OPENED: 10:00 A.M. on Thursday Sept. 11, 1980
Eden Prairie City Hall
BIDDER BID SECURITY TOTAL BID AMOUNT
Bury & Carlson, Inc. 5% $18,027.50
Minnesota Valley Surfacing 5% $19,650.00
Bituminous Consulting & 5% $22,610.00
Contracting Co., Inc.
{
.
MEMO
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager e.
-FROM:- Carl Jullie, City Engineer 3
• �
DATE: September 11, 1980,
SUBJECT: Lime Sludge Removal
The two existing lagoons at the water plant are now full and must be excavated
to provide space for additional lime sludge from the water plant operation.
In the past we have tried to handle this work during the wintertime with City
dump trucks and rental of a dragline. However, the volume of sludge at this
time,and the consistency of the material requires large tandem dump trucks and
experienced operation of a large dragline. Accordingly, we recommend that
sealed bids be taken for such work. The estimated cost is A4,000 for excava-
tion and removal of approximately $8,000 cubic yards, plus an additional
$26,000 for the disposal fee at the Eden Prairie landfill.
Recommend that the bid opening date be set for 10:00 A.M., Monday, October 6,
1980.
CJJ:kh
Sept. 16; 1980
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R80-183
RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND
CALLING FOR A HEARING (I.C. 51-385)
WHEREAS, a report has been given by the City Engineer to the
City Council on Sept. 16, 1980, recommending the following improvements
to wit:
I.C. 5I-385, Storm drainage outlet for
Lake Idlewild
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUCIL:
1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements
in accordance with the report and the assessment of
all property abutting or within said boundaries for all
or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant
to M.S.A. Sect. 420.011 to 429.111, at an estimated
total cost of the improvements as shown in said report.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed
improvement on the 7th day of October, 1980, at 7:30 P.M.
at the Eden Prairie City Hall. The City Clerk shall give
published and mailed notice of such hearing on the improve-
ments as required by law.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL •
John D. Frane, Clerk
2923
k„
•
It
MEMO
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: September 12, 1980
SUBJECT: Agreement With Bloomington • ..
Sewer Along Riverview Road
The City of Bloomington is proposing to construct a storm sewer outfall
leading from a large drainage pond in the southwest corner of Bloomington
south of Co. Rd. 18, thence westerly into Eden Prairie along Riverview
Road for approximately 1500 feet and there outfalling at Purgatory Creek.
This project would provide the required outlet for the drainage system
which includes about 1,000 acres in the City of Bloomington and 360 acres
in the southeast corner of Eden Prairie. We have been experiencing some
serious erosion problems along the south side of Riverview Road which the
f proposed storm sewer should help to eliminate.
Originally this storm sewer outlet was planned to be a 72" diameter pipe
as shown on the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Drainage Plan prepared in 1970.
Now, however, it is possible to reduce the pipe size down to 27" because
of the extensive ponding system which has been provided within Bloomington,
thus reducing the project cost considerably.
The estimated construction cost of the proposed project is $160,000. Eden
Prairie's estimated share would be 25% or $40,000 plus $4,000 for engineering
for a total of $44,000. Payment to Bloomington would be due over 5 years
after completion at 8% interest, or paid in full any time during that period 4
at our option. The completion date for construction is November 15, 19B0, It
is proposed that the City's share be paid from the general fund rather than
through special assessments to the specific drainage area because this project
will be part of the City's overall trunk storm sewer system which, when com-
pleted, will be a benefit to the entire community.
Recommend that the City Council authorize the Mayor and Manager to sign the
attached "Agreement for Construction and Maintenance of Storm Sewer System
Serving Areas in the Cities of Eden Prairie and Bloomington."
CJJ:kh
2327
.
•
•
AGREEMENT
FOR
CONSTROCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF STORM SEWER SYSTEM
SERVING AREAS IN THE CITIES OF EDEN PRAIRIE AND BLOOMINGTON
THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day of 4
1980, by and between the City of Eden,Prairie, a body politic and
corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter refer-
red to as "Eden Prairie" and the City of Bloomington, a body politic
'and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter
referred to as "Bloomington".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, There is an existing storm sewer and ponding system in
West Bloomington which serves drainage areas in both Eden Prairie and
Bloomington. This storm sewer system currently ends in a ponding area
located at 106th Street and Decatur Avenue in Bloomington; and
WHEREAS, Because of urban development in both Eden Prairie and
Bloomington there is a need to construct an outfall storm sewer from
• this pond in Bloomington to the Purgatory Creek in Eden Prairies and
WHEREAS, It is proposed that the storm sewer be constructed along
Riverview Road in Eden Prairie and along Townline Avenue in Bloomington;
and
WHEREAS, The overall City drainage plans for Eden Prairie and
•
Bloomington indicate a storm sewer at this location; and
WHEREAS,.It is considered appropriate that the cost of this storm
sewer be shared, based proportionally on the contributing area from
Eden Prairie and Bloomington.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED:
x
Bloomington shall prepare the necessary plans, specifications,
and proposals; shall advertise and receive bids for the construction
of this project; and shall perform the required Engineering and
Inspection.
�. II
Eden Prairie shall have the opportunity to review and approve the
plans and specifications as prepared by Bloomington.
2.329 -1"
Agreement for Construction
and Maintenance of Storm Sewer
System Serving Areas in the
Cities of Eden Prairie and
Bloomington
Following the receipt of bids, Bloomington shall promptly submit •
to Eden Prairie a copy of the abstract of bids received for the project. 1
together with a request for.concurrence by Eden Prairie in the award of }
a construction contract.
•
III
The construction of the drainage improvement shall be under the
supervision and direction of Bloomington. However, Eden Prairie shall
cooperate with Bloomington, at their request, to the extent reasonably
requested, but will have no responsibility for supervision of the work.
IV
Bloomington shall have, and has, full power and authority, for
and on behalf of Eden Prairie and Bloomington, after consultation with
end concurrence of Eden Prairie to negotiate, compromise, settle, or
litigate any disputes of any kind with the Contractor.
V
Eden Prairie will grant to Bloomington the right to use Riverview
Road for the construction of this storm sewer and will allow Bloomington
• to make the necessary connections to the existing culvert at Purgatory
Creek.
VI
Eden Prairie shall have the right to make connections to the pro-
posed storm sewer for street catch basins and other areas within the
normal drainage area of the proposed storm sewer.
VII
Maintenance of the drainage improvements constructed within Eden
Prairie under this Agreement shall be the responsibility of Eden•Prairie.
Maintenance of the drainage improvements constructed in Bloomington
under this Agreement shall be the responsibility of Bloomington.
After completion of the work, the storm sewer in Eden Prairie shall
become the property of Eden Prairie, and the storm sewer in Bloomington
shall be the property of Bloomington.
-Z-
233U :.
•
Agreement for Construction
and Maintenance of Storm Sewer
System Serving Areas in the
Cities of Eden Prairie and
Bloomington
Any changes or additions required to this portion of the system
shall be the subject of a future Agreement. Mo major changes shall
be made without the concurrence of both parties.
All records kept by Eden Prairie and Bloomington with respect to
this drainage improvement shall be subject to examination by the
representatives of each at reasonable times during normal business
hours.
VIII
Bloomington shall obtain the necessary permits for this work.
Eden Prairie will cooperate with Bloomington in this endeavor by
providing pertinent information as appropriate or requested.
IX
The construction of the storm sewer system along Riverview Road
and Townline Ave: shall be shared as follows:
Eden Prairie 25%
Bloomington 75%
The estimated cost of the storm sewer construction is $150,000
However, the unit prices set forth in the contract with the successful
bidder and the final quantities as measured shall govern in computing
the total final contract construction cost for apportioning the cost
of this project, according to the provisions of this paragraph.
In addition to payment of Eden Prairie's proportionate share of
the contract construction costs, Eden Prairie also agrees to pay to
Bloomington a sum equal to 10% of the amount computed as Eden Prairie's
share of said construction costs as payment for Engineering and Inspection.
It is understood that if there is participation by any other
government agency, such as Hennepin County, that the amount shall be
deducted prior to the cost split as outlined above.
X
{ The amount owed to Bloomington by Eden Prairie shall be due as follows: 20%
within 60 days after the contract is completed and upon submittal to Eden Prairie
of Bloomiington's final itemized statement of said storm sewer cost, ther•+(tar
20%on March 1, I982, 201 on March 1, 1983, 20%on March 1, 1984. and final payment
of the remaining amount due on March 1. 1985. Payment shall include interest at
8%on the unpaid balance due. Eden Prairie, at its option may pay in full the
unpaid balance due at any time during said repayment period without penalties or
additional interest. -8`
233(
Agreement for Construction
and Maintenance of Storm Sewer
System Serving Areas in the
Cities of Eden Prairie and
Bloomington
xI
It is further agreed that Bloomington shall not be responsible
or liable to Eden Prairie or to any other person or persons whomsoever
for claims, damages, action, or cause of action of any kind or
character arising out of or by reason of the performance of any work
or part hereof by the City as provided for herein; and Eden Prairie
further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense any action or
proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatso-
•
ever character arising in connection with or by virtue of performance
hereunder by Eden Prairie.
It is further agreed that Eden Prairie shall not be responsible
•
or liable to Bloomington or to any other person or persons whomsoever
for claims, damages. action, or cause of action of any kind or character
arising out of or by reason of the performance of any work or part
hereof by the County as provided for herein; and Bloomington further
agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense any action or proceeding
• commenced for the purpos
e of asserting any claim of whatsoever character
arising in connection with or by virtue of performance hereunder by
• Bloomington.
III
It is further agreed that any and all employees of Eden Prairie
and all other persons engaged by Eden Prairie in the performance of
any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed
by Eden Prairie shall not be considered employees of Bloomington, and
that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's
Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of
Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all
claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission
•
on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or
services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obliga-
tion or responsibility of Bloomington.
Also, any and all employees of Bloomington and all other persons
engaged by Bloomington in the performance of any work or services
-4-
.Z33 2
Agreement for Construction
and Maintenance of Storm Sewer '
System Serving Areas in the
Cities of Eden Prairie and
Bloomington
required or provided for herein to be performed by Bloomington shall
not be considered employees of Eden Prairie, and that any and all claims '
that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act or the
Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of
said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third
parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said
employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to
be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility
of Eden Prairie.
• XIII
• The provisions of M.S. 181.59 and of any applicable local ordinance
relating to Civil Rights and discrimination and the affirmative action
policy statement of Bloomington shall be considered a part of this
Agreement as though fully set forth herein.
CITY OP EDEN PRAIRIE
By
Mayor
Date
(SEAL)
And
Manager
Date
CITY OP BLOOMINGTON
By
Mayor
(SEAL) Date
And �.
•
Manager
Date
t �
g333
ti
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
September 16, 1980
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 Family) VENDING MACHINES
Minnesota Package Products Coca Cola Bottling Co.
Olympus Development Inc. Locations:
Sh^pard Construction, Inc. Deco Plants
Strom & Mayville, Inc. Mc Glynn Bakery
CONTRACTORS (Multi-Family & Comm.)
Kraus-Anderson of St. Paul Co.
Lester's of Minnesota, Inc.
Roger Sheehy Co.
HEATING & VENTILATING
Bostrom Sheet Metal Works, Inc.
Ed Lacy Inc.
State Mechanical
GAS FITTER
State Mechanical
PLUMBING
Aarons Plumbing & Sewer
J.R. Kelly Plumbing & Heating
SOLICITORS
Concepts Plus
SUNDAY LIQUOR
The Brother's Restaurant Inc.
These licenses have been approved by the department head responsible for
the licensed activity.
64.0 in. a..10
Cindy M. Plante, Licensing Clerk
233y