HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 08/19/1980 AGENDA
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
l 11UESDAY, AUGUST 19, 19B0 7:30 PM, CITY HALL
, ' :HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Dean Edstrom,
Dave Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and
Paul Redpath
.,HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY STAFF: City Manager Roger K. Ulstad, Finance
Director John D. Frane, and Jean
`., ; Johnson, Recording Secretary
,'INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL
— I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER i;"
II. DESIGNATION OF CHAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON
III. RECEIVE COMMENTS FROM PLANNING COMMISSION ANS REFER PLAN TO THE CITY Page 1972
'''' __—._COUNCIL f, n Al7
I.V. ADJOURN MEETING
ESEN PMIRIE CITY COUNCIL
( TUESIAY, AUGUST 19, 19SO Immediately following Housing & Re-
development Authority Meeting
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Sean Edstrom,
Save Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and Paul
Redpath
COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger K. Ulstad; City
Attorney Roger Pauly; Planning Director
Chris EnIer; Finance Oirectsr John Frane; •
Director of Community Services Bob
Lambert; City Engineer Carl Jullie; and
Jean Johnson, Recording Secretary
I. FRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATE OF MERIT FROM PRESIIENT CARTER THROUGH Page I975
THE AMERICAN RES CROSS TS STUART FIX, MIKE ROGERS ANI JAMES BERGSTROM
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA ANS OTHER ITEMS SF BUSINESS
III. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELI TUESIAY, AUGUST 5, 1910 Page 1976
' IV. CONSENT CALENSAR
A. Request to set a Public Hearing for the Ede Prairie Tax Increment
Financing Plan for September 16, 1980 r :v i �„. ' 1' :� —,�-. C. ,'� ''�
B. Approve plans and specifications and order bids for sewer and_ Page I994
water improvements along T.H. f01 north of Valley View Road, I.C.
51-386 1 Resolution No. 80-154)
Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,August 19, 1980
C. Approve plans and specifications and order bids for street Page 1995
improvements in Hipp's Mitchell Heights 4th Addition, I.C. 51-353A
(Resolution No. 80-156)
it O. Approve plans and specifications and order bids for utility and Page 1996
street improvements in Rymarland Camp 2nd Addition, I.C. 51-383
(Resolution No. 80-157)
E. Resolution No. 80-158, approving election judges Page 1997
F. Request to set Public Hearing for September 2, 1980 for the 1981
City Budget
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
t A. Feasibility Report for Tax Increment Financing (continued from Page 1859
August 5, 1980)
8. Federal Revenue Sharing Funds Page 1999
C. Timber Creek PUD by B-T Land Company. Request for Planned Unit Page 2000
Development approval on 150 acres of land for single family and
�� multiple residential, park land and open space uses. Located
•
north of Duck Lake Trail, West of Co. Rd. 4, and south of Town-
Road (Resolution No. BO-151 - PUD, and Resolution No. 80-159 -
E.A.W.)
D. Thorn Creek Place PUD by Minneapolis Retail Meat Cutters & Food Page 2057A
Handlers Health & Welfare Fund. Request for PUD Concept approval
for office, commercial and multiple residential uses on 60 acres.
Located north and west of Co. Rd. 39 and east of U.S. 169-212
(Resolution No. 80-152)
VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 2757 - 2981 Page 2070
VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
VIII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
`-A, Request from Northern States Power for a change in their developer's Page 2075
agreement for NSP substation and location of 345/115 kv tower
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
B. Report of City Attorney
C.' Report of City Manager
I; Report of Director of Community Services
1. Hidden Ponds Park Plan Page 2077
2 Request to advertise for bids for grading and seeding Hidden Page 2D80
Ponds Park and Creekwood Park
3 Request to advertise for bids for construction of the Page 2081
Community Center
4.: Round Lake Treatment and Restocking Program Page 2082
. _ .
•
Council Agenda - 3 - /Tues.,August 19, 1980
E. Report of City Engineer
.1.) Final plat approval for Braun's\ t s (Resolution No,
80-160) Page 2084
2. Receive feasibility report for storm drainage improvements Page 2086
in Sutton 1st Addition, I.C. 51-370 (Resolution No. 80-128)
Continued from 7/15/80
3:' Resolution No. 80-153, declaring costs to be assessed and Page 20B7
ordering preparation of proposed 1980 special assessment
rolls and setting hearing date for September 16, 1980
) 4. Consider bids for improvements on Anderson Lakes Parkway, Page 2088
including park site grading, I.C. 51-341 (Resolution No.
80-155)
. _
5. Change Order No. 4, I.C. 51-326, Oell Road realignment Page 2089
and agreement for right-of-way
6. ) Purchase agreement with Tudor Oaks Condominium Project for Page 2092 ..-.-
sale of City property abutting T.H. 169 south of Schooner
Boulevard
F. Report of Finance Director
1. Clerk's License List , Page 2094
X. NEW BUSINESS
XI. ADJOURNMENT.
j ?,);.4,4•1
ape'ttord
•
.•
/4, )
,ev-P
/Y
. .
; .*
. _ -v
w 7
Unapproved
Manning Commission Minutes -1- August 11,1980
MEMBERS ABSENT: Gartner
IV. EDEN PRAIRIE (DEVELOPMENT) REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
City Manager, Roger Ulstad was present to answer questions regarding the Man
which had been continued from July 28, 1980.
Levitt stated that he wanted the vote to read as a finding of fact rather than
a recommendation.
Torjesen stated that it was his opinion that the City should not be encouraging
growth and that he intended to vote nay.
Motion
entley moved finding the road improvements planned for financing under the
HRA Man in conformance with the City's Revised Comprehensive Guide Plan.
Sutliff seconded, motion carried 4-1-1. Bearman abstaining and Torjesen voting
nay.
19?2
approved
Planning Commission Minutes -1- July 28, 1980
MENDERS ABSENT: Beaman t Retterath
IV. EDEN PRAIRIE (Development) REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
John Frane, City Financial Director presented the Tax Increment and (Development)
Redevelopment Plan, listing the major road improvements to be financed in the
Major Center Area. He explained that the bridges, underpasses. and ramps made up
a major portion of the cost which the City had been depending on State help for.
These projects had been dropped by the State due to lack of funds and that the
Tax Increment financing method remained the only viable way to proceed.
Bentley inquired if any property owners would be assessed for any portion of the
improvement. Frane replied that although the major improvements suLh as bridges
would be funded by Tax Increment, 60% of the 2-lane roadway would be assessed to
property owners on a front foot basis.
8" Bentley asked about the phasing of the project. Frane replied that phasing would
proceed in areas currently under development first.
Bentley asked what the effect of the Tax Increment District on other Agencies was,
and what problems would occur if the Tax Increment District could not repay the
bonds within the allowed time.
Frane replied that since the District was being utilized to stimulate development
that may not otherwise happen and be taxable, that the effect on other agencies
would be neglible. In terms of debt repayment, he said that the intent was to
sell Revenue Bonds, which committed only the vehicle of revenue production for
repayment Frane explained further that you have 25 years from start until the
final bond is retired. $pp
Torjesen asked when the underpass and ramps would be built on 1-494. Frane stated
that it was possible to begin by 1982.
Torjesen asked if the Plan was meant to encourage development, as he felt this was
not the concensus of Eden Prairie's Citizens. Frane replied yes.
Torjesen asked if the costs projected would still be valid in 1987. Frane felt
that they would.
Gartner asked that if the taxes go up as a result of this, and they have not rebuilt
anything, would that still be a tax increment district. Frane replied yes.
♦.i
Sutliff asked about the access to the properties.
The Planner replied that Schooner Blvd. will be a limited access road. Intersections
will be limited to 6E0 ft. spicing. This would allow signalization of each access
point in the event it became necessary.
Torjesen commented that he feels that the City has an obligation to improve access
{ to Eden Prairie Center and to its customers and to other users. He does not feel
that the City should get in and encourage rapid development of the major Center
area.
Bentley stated that the M.C.A. addressed the area as being of regional importance
and outlined it as an area of high density development. Also, by not finding ways
of encouraging development, they are actually putting a hardship on property owners.
1y'3
•
approved
Planning Commission Minutes -2- July 28, 1980
Warren Gerecke, Golden Ridge Drive, stated that he agrees with the idea of tax
increments but he feels there is a critical need for the Homart Shoppinn Center
to have better roads to get to the Center. He also feels that the whole City
should be taxed rather than a tax increment district because the whole City benefits
from this.
Gartner asked if there was additional time available for Planning Commission consid-
eration. Frane replied yes, but was hopeful that the plan submitted to the comm-
ission contained ample information.
`4 Levitt asked what financing alternates were available for road improvements. Frane
replied that there are no alternatives.
S
Levitt asked the value of the development already occuring in the major Center
area. Frane replied that it is about 18 million dollars. 5 million of which is
Homart Center.
John Gollie, Willow Creek Road, asked whether State or Federal funding could be
restored in years to come. Frane replied that it is hard to predict, but if the
•
funds do come that could reduce the cost of the tax,increment district financing.
Don Sorensen, 7121 Willow Creek Road, asked if the allocation of the special
assessment of 95/5 has changed. Frane replied that yes, there had been a change
but he did not know the percentage rate.
Motion
aner moved to continue until August 11, 1980 in order to allow the commission
time to consider whether the project was consistent with the Comprehensive Guide
Plan. Torjesen seconded.
Discussion
evil—tt asked what the commission is being asked to do. Frane replied that they are •
being asked to determine if the plan conforms with the Comprehensive Guide Plan.
Levitt asked if this plan conformed with the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The Planner
stated that it was generated from the Comprehensive Guide Plan.
Vote
' ' %Iron carried 3-2. Sutliff and Bentley voted no:.
19�y
DATE: August 15, 1980
TO: Roger Ulstad, Manager
FROM: Jack Hacking
SUBJECT: Certificate of Merit
Fireman Michael Rogers and City Employee Stuart Fox will receive the
Certificate of Merit Award for the Emergency Medical Care that they
provided to Jim Shultz when he was injured in a diving accident on
the Mississippi River on August 19, 1979. Attached is a letter from
Dr. John L. Seymour stating that without the proper care provided
by Mike and Stuart that Jim Shultz may have been paralyzed from the
neck down.
Public Safety Officer James Bergstrom will receive the Certificate of
Merit Award for giving CPR to the victim of a heart attack who was
standing on a street corner at Fort Snelling waiting for a bus. Officer
Bergstrom administered CPR until the ambulance arrived and then rode
to the hospital in the ambulance continuing to provide CPR. Officer
Bergstrom was employeed by the Federal Protective Securities Department
at this time. This incident took place in January of 1979.
i;
il. NEUROSURGICAL ASSOCIATES, LTD. t 4
1100 METROPOLITAN MEDICAL OUILOINO
820 BOUTN CIONTN STREET +�
MINNCAPO4IS.MINNESOTA 55404 •
• • PRONE I6I8I336.1053
.OIOL,M.D. II.
�YMOUR,M.O. 1
•
rtoaewa,M.O. February_7, 1980
ROCKSWOLD,M.D.
1
Mr. Jack Hacking
Director.of Public Safety
7905 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Re: .James.Shultz
5125 West 110th Street
Bloomington, MN 55437
Dear Mr. Hacking:
I have-been-requested-by-daunes-Shaitz--to sendryou-a-letter regarding—
•
his injury and the emergency first aid he received.on the 19th of August, i
1979. He is a man who dove off the roof of a houseboat into about three
to four feet of shallow water. He had.hit his head on rocks on the bottom IRIj
and was dazed but able to stand up at that time.
MCS
He was, however, unable to get himself out.of the water and was --
assisted by two friends: Mike Rogers and Stu.Fox. Because there was a
neck injury involved and the victim was complaining of arm numbness,
several precautions were taken by these..two individuals. Before moving
Mr.- Shultz -from the water, a back board was fashioned from a wooden table
and then several bath towels were used to immobilize his neck. ""
It turned out that Mr. Shultz had a broken neck and a scalp lacera- G
tion.
GE
Without proper care of an injured neck, proper transportation on
a back board and immobilization of his neck, he could possibly have been
paralyzed from the neck down.
As I.am sure you are aware, this is certainly most important in
cases where there is a question.af neck.injury-and•particularly those m
when the patient complains of numbness or tingling in some part of the
body that the neck be protected well during movement to a.proper care
facility.
Sincerely yours,
1 /
e1
✓/ .A
Vic*':L.t L•.:a Z . .r
John L. Seymour, M. D.
JLS:ien
cc James Shultz
19'15fl
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES
TUESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1980 7:30 PM, CITY HALL
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Dean Edstrom, Dave
Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and Paul Redpath
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger K. Ulstad and Joyce
Provo, Recording Secretary
INVOCATION: Dave Osterholt
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: All members present,
I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
Mayor Penzel called the meeting to order at 7:30 PM.
II. APPROVE AND REFER PLAN TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adopt the plan and refer
same to the Planning Commission for their review and a written report back
to the Housing & Redevelopment Authority, and to the Hennepin County Board of a.
Commissioners and School District No. 272 for review. Motion carried
unanimously.
III. ADJOURN MEETING
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Redpath, to adjourn the meeting at 7:33 PM.
Motion carried unanimously.
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
TUESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1980 7:35 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Dean Edstrom, Dave
Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and Paul Redpath 1
COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney
Roger Pauly; Planning Director Chris Enger;
Director of Community Services Bob Lambert;
City Engineer Carl Jullie, and Joyce Provo,
Recording Secretary
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following item was added to the Consent Calendar as III. J.: Reschedule
Public Hearing for Lake Ridge Office Park and Bryant Lake Center PUD from
August 19, 1980 to September 2, 1980.
MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the agenda as amended and
published. Motion carried unanimously.
II. MINUTES
A. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, July 1, 1980
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the minutes of the
July 1, 1980 Council meeting as published. Osterholt, Pauly, Edstrom and
Penzel voted "aye"; Redpath "abstained". Motion carried.
City Council Minutes - 2 - Tues.,August 5, 1980
B. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, July 15, 1980
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the minutes of the
July 15, 1980 Council meeting as published. Redpath, Osterholt, Redpath and
Penzel voted "aye"; Edstrom "abstained". Motion carried.
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Request to set a Public Hearing to rezone properties in southwestern Eden Prairie
(zoned I-General, previously Plan Study) to Rural for September 2, 1980
C. Request to set a Public Hearing to rezone Neill Woods 2nd Addition from Rural
to R1-13.5 for September 2, 1980
D. Final plat approval for Rymarland Camp 2nd Addition (Resolution No. 80-142)
E. 100% petition for improvements in Rymarland Camp 2nd Addition, I.C. 51-383
(Resolution No. 80-143)
F. Resolutions for "No Parking" on proposed State Aid roads (Resolution No. 80-144,
Valley View Road west of Co. Rd. 4 and Dell Road, and Resolution No. 80-145,
Anderson Lakes Parkway, T. H. 169 to Preserve Boulevard)
G. Request from Hennepin County to designate County Road 4 (Spring Road) south of
County Road 1 as a County State Aid Route (Resolution No. 80-149)
H. Request to set a Public Hearing for proposed Communications System for September
2, 1980
I. Request for approval of Christ Lutheran Church site plan
Approval subject to putting the reciprocal easement in a recordable form
acceptable to the City Attorney prior to building permit issuance.
t d
J. Reschedule Public Hearing for Lake Ridge Office Park and Bryant Lake Center PUD 1
from August 19, 1980 to September 2, 1980
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve items A - J on the Consent 1
Calendar. Motion carried unanimously.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Anderson Lakes Parkway Neighborhood Shopping Center by Eden Prairie Real Estate
Investment Corporation. Request for PUD Concept approval and preliminary plat
approval for 2 restaurants and 2 commercial sites. Located East of US 169 and
South of Anderson Lakes Parkway (Resolution No. 80-125 - P110; and Resolution
No. 80-126 - preliminary plat) Continued from July 15, 1980
City Manager Ulstad explained at the July 15th Council meeting there was concern
expressed by the Council regarding Outlot A which did not have a designation within
the PUD.
Francis Hagen, Westwood Planning & Engineering, representing the proponents,
stated they are willing to designate Outlot A for office or publics which could
be an office or library, or semi-public, which could be a church or day care center.
Mr. Hagen spoke to the berming and landscaping proposed along the east side.
/W 17
City Council Minutes - 3 - Tues.,August 5, t98U
A. Anderson Lakes Parkway Neighborhood Shopping Center (continued)
Osterholt asked City Planner Enger if he felt this would be a satisfactory plan
for Outlot A. Mr. Enger replied in the affirmative.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing and
adopt Resolution No. 80-125, approving the request for PUD Concept approval for
Anderson Lakes Parkway Neighborhood Shopping Center by Eden Prairie Real Estate
Investment Corporation subject to the Staff Report dated June 5, 1980,
recommendations of the Planning Commission and the Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission, and the designation of Outlot A for office or quasi-public.
Motion carried unanimously. '
MOTION: Redpath moved seconded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution No. 80-126,
approving the preliminary plat for Anderson Lakes Parkway Neighborhood Shopping %.
Center. Motion carried unanimously. is
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pauly, to direct staff to draft a developer's a
agreement incorporating the Staff Report dated June 5,1980, recommendations of
Planning Commission and the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission,
including the designation of Outlot A for office or quasi-public. Motion carried
unanimously.
B. Street name changes - Bluff,Boulevard and Bluff Road (Ordinance No. 80-20)
Continued from July 1, 1980
City Manager Ulstad explained at the July 1st Council meeting the Council reviewed
the present names of Bluffs Boulevard and Bluff Road, and there was a suggested
change to Bluff Road and also the Homeward Hills extension. At that meeting it
was decided that the Council wanted to review this further so the Public Hearing
was continued to August 5, 1980, with instructions that the property owners be
renotified.
City Engineer Jullie displayed an overhead of the present road situation.
Tom Treno, 10356 Bluffs Boulevard, read from a petition signed by 87 residents 1
on Bluffs Boulevard expressing opposition to the proposal for changing Bluffs
Boulevard to West Bluffs Boulevard, or to any change in the name of Bluffs
Boulevard (attached as part of minutes). Mr. Treno stated he does not believe
adding "East" or "West" will end the confusion The petitioners are in favor for
the most part in leaving the road as Bluffs Boulevard, and if a change has to be
made that a totally different street name be considered.
Ron Newman, 10407 Bluffs Boulevard, suggested if a change has to take place
that different names be given to the cul-de-sacs. Also if Bluffs Boulevard has
to be changed that it be a distinct name change, not "East" & "West" or "E" & "W".
Steve Ring, 10336 Bluffs Boulevard, agreed with Mr. Newman's suggestions.
Ken Fasching, 10472 Bluffs Boulevard, suggested naming the cul-de-sacs in
alphabetical order rather than random names.
Hugh Brenner, 9599 Bluff Road, explained those residents living on Bluff Road have
had continuity of residence for up to 40 years, and it does seem to be a little
bit unfair that a developer comes in and happens to make a nam• causes a little
trouble later on and then they have to change their name. I %onerou`>)should be on
whoever caused this confusion to correct it, rather than the o have had
this name for such a long period of time.
Mrs. Brenner also expressed opposition to changing the Bluff Road name along
with Dr. Fred Ekrem, 9845 Bluff Road.
Walter James, 1D340 Bluffs Boulevard, strongly suggested a distinct name change
for each cul-de-sac and leaving the road out in front a distinct name, i.e.,
Homeward Hills Road or whatever. Further to petition the neighbors between now •
and the next Council meeting to see what they want. t9 ie
City Council Minutes - 4 - Tues.,August 5, 1980 1
B. Street name changes - Bluffs Boulevard and Bluff Road (continued)
0sterholt suggested consideration be given to calling the cul-de-sacs circles
( rather than streets or avenues.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to continue the Public Hearing
to September 16, 1980, for the purpose of allowing the residents to work with
City Engineer Jullie to develop B distinctive names for the cul-de-sacs, 1
that Bluffs Boulevard as now constituted be renamed Homeward Hills Road down to
Riverview Road, and to discontinue any consideration of name changes for
Bluff Road which would remain as is. Motion carried unanimously.
Penzel commented that Bluffs Boulevard should also be eliminated in the Bluffs
West 2nd/3rd Addition.
C. Proposed frontage road improvements along T.H. 5 between Fuller Road and Co. Rd. 1
4 (Resolution No. 80-150)
City Engineer Jullie spoke to the proposed project and assessments, and displayed
a graphic depicting same. Jullie recommended the Council consider ordering in
the improvements as the project is feasible.
Edstrom asked if City Engineer Jullie had any reactions from any of the owners,
particularly those properties to the east.
Jullie replied he did send a copy of the feasibility report to all of the people
within the project and has had some reaction and some concern about the cost,
i.e., Stewart Sandwich property owners feel that perhaps they now have a connection
that works quite well for them, and a gentleman from Birchwood Laboratories
called and said the problem at Hwy. 5 and Fuller Road is less now than before the
Stewart connection was made.
Max Kettlewell, Project Coordinator for E. A. Sween Company (formerly Stewart
Sandwich Company), spoke in opposition to the proposed improvements inasmuch
as they don't have any traffic going out onto Highway 5 now. They are satisfied
with their own approach and would not be interested in the proposed improvement
from the standpoint of cost and assessment.
Peter Petrulo, Executive Vice President of Operations for the E. A. Sween Company,
also spoke in opposition to the proposed improvements.
Norman Villwock, Birchwood Laboratories, commented as Birchwood Laboratories
owns the largest acreage in the assessed area, they are opposed to this assessment.
Mr. Villwock added they are highly interested in solving the safety problem
but feel the cost to them is excessive for this project.
Mr. McGregor, Amoco Oil Company, spoke in opposition to the project, i.e., there is
about $100,000.00 spent on soil correction so there must be other more feasible
solutions, it doesn't serve a very big area, when you get over to Fuller Road
there is limited stack area, it appears the best solution would be the one with
Justus Lumber, and this improvement project has limited benefit to Amoco.
Osterholt added one advantage to the Justus plan is it does add more acreage to
the project and therefore reduces the per acre assessment.
ai
City Council Minutes - 5 - Tues.,August 5, 1980
C. Proposed frontage road improvements along T.H. 5 between Fuller Road and Co. Rd.
4 (ccontinued)
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to close the Public Hearing and
instruct staff to prepare a feasbility report on 3 alternatives for potential
hearing on October 21, 1980, those alternatives being: 1) between Fuller Road
and Co. Rd. 4, 2) between the Sween Company and Birchwood Laboratories property,
and 3) the southerly one (Justus property). Motion carried unanimously.
D. Deer Creek PUD & Rezoning by T.G.C. Development, Inc. Request for PUD concept
approval on 8D acres for single family, townhouse, quadra-miniums, and commercial
use; rezoning from Rural to RM 2.5 for first phase, preliminary plat approval,
and approval of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Located east of Mitchell
Road, south of Old Farm Quads, and north of Ridgewood West (Resolution No. 80-138 -
PUD; Ordinance No. 80-19 - rezoning; Resolution No. .80-139 - preliminary.plat;_and.
Resolution No. 80-140 - E.A.W.)
Bill Dolan, Project Engineer, spoke to the proposal and displayed graphics and
a model depicting same.
Bill Fierke, Vice President of Marketing for Orrin Thompson, showed slides of
quads they have built in other communities and distributed a brochure of Town
Homes by Orrin Thompson.
City Planner Enger explained this item was considered at the May 12, June 9,
June 23 and July 14th Planning Commission meetings. The Commission on July 14th
did recommend to the City Council approval of the PUD Concept for the 8D acres,
preliminary plat for the central portion, rezoning for the 1st phase from Rural to
RM 2.5 based on the plan dated July 10, 1980, the staff report dated June 20,
198D, and recommendations as outlined in the Planning (mission minutes dated
July 14, 1980. The Commission also recommended approval of the Environmental
Assessment Worksheet.
Enger added that the Planning Commission felt that prior to proceeding with Phase
2 the connection out to Mitchell Road should be underway,and that as part of
proceeding with Phase 2 that Anderson Lakes Parkway at least be an ordered in type
of project. Enger explained Mr. Carmody, the owner of the property for this
proposal, has been circulating a petition to surrounding land owners to extend
Anderson Lakes Parkway from Scenic Heights Road down through the Centex property.
Director of Community Services Lambert stated the Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission recommended approval to the City Council. Lambert addressed
the 3 concerns expressed by the Commission: 1) a trail connection between Mitchell
Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway, which has been satisfied with a 5 foot concrete
sidewalk, 2) that the pond on the south and the low space wetland area in the north
central portion be preserved and tied in with the homeowner owned mini-park or
totlot, and 3) the Purgatory Creek Study referred to when development occurred in
this area that the City should secure a trail easement along the creek leading
down to Staring Lake and when that area is rezoned that the trail easement be
secured.
Mr. Fierke and Mr. Dolan answered questions of Council members regarding the
proposal.
Penzel asked where the petition for Anderson Lakes Parkway is at this time?
Mr. Carmody replied he sent several copies of the petition out to the property
owners from Scenic Heights Road through Ridgewood, and he has the petition back
from Ridgewood, Centex and Northrup King signed. The people that are developing
Burning Tree haven't as yet signed the petition but are willing to. The bank who
owns approximately 1,300 feet on the nth side are at this point unwilling to sign.
City Council Minutes - 6 - Tues.,August 5, 1980
D. Deer Creek PUD & Rezoning by T.G.C. Development, Inc. (continued)
Edstrom asked if any consideration has been given to requiring the opening to the
west of Mitchell Road with the first phase of this development.
Enger replied the Planning Commission spent quite a lot of time with that idea in j
mind and did make the recommendation that the first phase be allowed to continue
prior to the connection of the road.
Edstrom commented from the park and recreation standpoint is there any
desirability of constructing a more substantial fence to protect the totlot from
the artery.
Lambert explained he talked to Enger about a fence when they first discussed
a totlot right on the through street, and they felt the use cf landscaping berms
would be used to discourage children from running out into the street.
Edstrom felt additional consideration should be given to more protection from
the street to the totlot.
Mr. Papenfuss, 8385 Mitchell Road, expressed concern about the 1st phase traffic
going down Mitchell Road which is going to get pretty crowded if Anderson Lakes
Parkway isn't built sooner, and asked that provisions be made to take care of the
additional traffic.
Penzel explained that ultimately the concept is to reroute most of that traffic
along Anderson Lakes Parkway. The problem is that not all of the property owners
are enamored with the idea of extending it at this time. The Council will have to
look at the petitions, if and when it receives them, and at the same time keep
monitoring through the City staff what the traffic levels are on Mitchell Road
to see what the needs are toward the extension of Anderson Lakes Parkway between
Hwy. 169 where Scenic Heights and Mitchell Road now meet.
Letter from Sandra Sheperd, 14242 Chestnut Drive, was entered into the record.
(Attached as part of minutes)
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to close the Public Hearing and adopt
Resolution No. 80-138, granting PUD concept approval for 80 acres for single family,
townhouse, quadra-minium and commercial use. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to give a 1st Reading to Ordinance
No. 80-19, rezoning from Rural to RM 2.5 for the first phase for Deer Creek by
T. G. C. Development, Inc. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to adopt Resolution No. 80-139,
approving the preliminary plat for Deer Creek by T.G.C. Development, Inc. Motion
carried unanimously.
MOTION: Edstrom movea, seconaeo by Pauly, to adopt Resolution No. 80-140, approving
the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Deer Creek by T.G.C. Development, Inc.
Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Osterholt, to direct staff to draft a
developer's agreement incorporating the recommendations of the Staff Report
dated June 20, 1980, the Planning Commission and the Parks, Recreation &
Natural Resources Commission. Further that the Mitchell Road connection be
constructed with Phase 1, and the segment of Anderson Lakes Parkway be constructed
with Phase 2, with more totlot protection than is shown. Motion carried
unanimously.
City Council Minutes - 7 - Tues.,August 5, 1980
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 2530 - 2756
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve Payment of Claims Nos. i
2530 - 2756. Osterholt, Redpath, Edstrom and Penzel voted "aye" on all claims,
Pauly "abstained" on Claim No. 2666 and voted "aye" on all other claims. Motion
carried.
VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
No reports. 1
VII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 80-141, future corridor designation for Highway #212 1
9
MOTION: Pauly moved, secnded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution No. 80-141,
future corridor designation for Highway #212. Motion carried unanimously.
B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 80-18, increasing dog impounding fees
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Penzel, to approve the 2nd Reading of
Ordinance No. 80-18, increasing the dog impounding fees. Motion carried
unanimously.
VIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Councilman Osterholt asked that the City Manager provide the Council
with some projection on liquor sales profits. Osterholt also suggested the
City might want to look into word processing equipment to help relieve
the workload and cut down on paper work.
2. Councilman Redpath spoke to the suggested format to be used for the Cable
TV Hearings, which the Council members agreed to follow.
3. Mayor Penzel announced he would be running for reelection. Penzel
suggested the Council might want to consider the organization of the Housing
& Redevelopment Authority at the August 19, 1980 meeting; Council members—
concurred.
B. Report of City Attorney
No report.
C. Report of City Manager
D. Report of City Engineer
1. Consider bids for seal coating, I.C. 51-339
City Engineer Jullie spoke to bids received, and recommended awarding
the bids to Allied Blacktop Company, the low responsible bidder, in the
amount of $53,150,00,
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to award the bids for seal
coating, I.C. 51-339, in the amount of $53,150.00 to Allied Blacktop Co.,
the low responsible bidder. Roll Call Vote: Osterholt, Pauly, Edstrom,
Redpath and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes - 8 - Tues.,August 5, 1980
2. Change Order No. 1, I.C. 51-321 (Lotus View Drive) and Change Order
No. 1, I.C. 51-326 (Dell Road)
( City Engineer Jullie spoke to his memo dated July 30, 1980, recommending
approval of said Change Orders.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve Change Order
No. 1, I.C. 51-321 (Lotus View Drive) and Change Order No.1, I.C. 51-326
(Dell Road) in the amount of $8,161.00 as per City Engineer's recommendation.
Roll Call Vote: Osterholt, Redpath, Edstrom, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye".
Motion carried unanimously.
3. Receive Feasibility Report and set hearing date for September 2, 1980
for improvements on Industrial Drive, I.C. 51-288 (Resoluton No. 80-146)
City Engineer Jullie spoke to Resolution No. 80-146, and recommended
approval of same.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No. 80-146,
receiving the feasiblity report and setting a hearing date for September
2, 1980 for I.C. 51-288, improvements on Industrial Drive south of Co. Rd.
67. Motion carried unanimously.
4. Final plat approval on revised Cardinal Creek Estates 2nd Addition ',
(Resolution No. 80-148)
City Engineer Jullie spoke to the revised final plat for Cardinal Creek
Estates 2nd Addition.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to adopt Resolution No. 80-148,
approving the revised final plat for Cardinal Creek Estates 2nd Addition.
Motion carried unanimously.
E. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Trail connection between Edenvale Boulevard and Hillcrest Court (continued
from 7/1/80)
Director of Community Services Lambert requested to have this item
continued to give Engineering Staff a chance to look at the area to see if
a trail is feasible.
Council continued this item to a date uncertain.
2. Peony Garden
Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to his memo dated July 14, 1980
regarding the Peony Garden at Cummins/Grill House.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to appropriate $1,000.00
to be used for a part-time gardener for the peony garden. Roll Call Vote:
Osterholt, Redpath, Edstrom, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried
unanimously.
3. Round Lake Irrigation
Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to his memo dated July 23, 1980
requesting authorization from the Council to advertise to receive bids
on August 28, 1980, and award bids at the City Council meeting on September 2,
1980.
City Council Minutes - 9 - Tues.,August 5, 1980
i
4. Round Lake Irrigation (continued)
t Osterholt stated he would feel more comfortable waiting for the final
figures on the Community Center building to see if there are any excess {
monies available to be used for an irrigation system. d
s
This item was continued to either the first or second Council meeting
in October, 1980.
5. Red Rock Park - Update
Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to his memo dated July 23,
1980. Lambert felt it was essential to bring the problem with the acquisition
of the Red Rock Park before the Council sometime this summer. The same
memo was forwarded to the Parks, Recreation-&-Natural Resources Commission
on August 4th and the Commission decided to take action. Their recommenda- g
tion was that if the City couldn't negotiate for acquisition of the park
before the end of this year, that we enter into condemnation on the parcel.
Lambert added more and more development is being approved around the park
and we can't wait much longer. j
Mr. Virgil Seifert, owner of the 14 acre parcel, stated the problem is the
developer he sold to two years ago is putting him off which makes him un-
certain just when he would want to sell the park land. The developer who
bought the land is in default right now, and there is a very good chance Mr.
Seifert may get the property back a second time. Mr. Seifert added he
should have a decision from the developer by August 20, 1980.
( Osterholt asked Mr. Seifert if he would be interested in the City's offer:
Mr. Seifert stated he expects to sell the land eventually; however, was
insulted with the appraisal obtained by the City as the property was sold
8 years ago for $3,700.00 an acre,and has been assessed for the last 8 years 1
at $3,500.00 an acre. The City's'appraisal is only for $2,000.00 an acre.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to continue this item to
the September 16, 1980 Council meeting, and to direct staff to look at i
alternative sites which might be used in place of Mr. Seifert's. Motion
carried unanimously.
6. Historic Parks
Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to his memo dated June 26, 1980
on City Historical Parks. Lambert explained he took this item to the
Parks, Recration & Natural Resources Commission on August 4th. The Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Commission suggested that a joint meeting
be held with the City Council and the Historical & Cultural Commission.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to set a joint meeting for
the City Council to meet with the Historical & Cultural Commission and
the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission to tour the Grill
house on October 2, 1980 at 6:30 PM. Motion carried unanimously.
140
City Council Minutes - 10 - Tues.,August 5, 1980
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. Easement acquisition - James J. Lorence
City Engineer Jullie spoke to the agreement between the City of Eden Prairie
and James J. Lorence, and recommended the Council consider approval of same.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to approve the agreement to grant
easements with James J. Lorence in-the-agreement as submitted by
City Engineer Jullie. Roll Call Vote: Redpath, Edstrom, Osterholt and Pauly
voted "aye"; Penzel "abstained". Motion carried unanimously.
X. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Redpath, to adjourn the Council meeting at
11:10 PM. Motion carried unanimously.
C
1a$J
We the undersigned petitioners are in opposition to the proposal
of changing Bluffs Boulevard to West Bluffs Boulevard and ar
opposed to any change in the name of Bluffs Boulevard. , /)
NAME ,, ADDRESS ,
e c% /1 c�, IC 33 6 i ij lg.1.v, ce_ c-, w*-k,.. ,
_ �Y U f
J ein) 4�,hwu) /03,5(a 5QJ�1�fo ' i 4.rY. ri�on, /0iLni.S.uJ
l�
S Its lalAP-) t 1.1) t,� ,,, •
,.,•
r' (`). / 1 o3(04. 1312ifrsiBil,a, e0An,r,VntuALL.
( cl., , ..r•_
4 15A. .‘,173� 3/4 / -' e 14< G U1/ EP _
- 141.4L [43310 BP.>, e_
c,yin -4,,LQ,-
l : /635"(4, iik /3/,,,1
�. /.
c53z c, , .:?i1,„, r: /0332 Ail4 :,,/
i ` _
V�` 1 . 133z. 1trsa(vn P •
;;;: , 'Ai/ 0 / y',i �/Y,e /, /!, ,,,
...:„, *--.7 )C 1,(4q- k.......,.,v SlA.ek...,,fs65 .G ),0 g__4 ,c)(1). „./.,,A—
.6. I Y/ U 3, ? //. ,�/. , / -4i / f •,, A /i V.
o
,�,/eXte.tiz ( ZlZuG�(_ / '3� INZX V iL C -• ^ ,'/
� //�� / Jy 7
�e)1V��t.l�s�,`fC/ .�5((M� �(?.?.-�� ��'Lt�+hli ���>) C'Z( �. ,
P
• a / o:c.-fil A/ n 7 r X f .
aff eV
Hi,* ,4/
'r
We the undersigned petitioners are in opposition to the proposal
of changing Bluffs Boulevard to West Bluffs Boulevard and are
opposed to any change in the name of Bluffs Boulevard. "-�)
r
( 11 ( )
•
•
NAME ADDRESS
.
I0452 _ tic . /�4a 101Ma ' k_k�c, !\ � _
. ' \'' \''1.. \'C1c DS..cti�-- t1
i0t1513 (''''L/341_,/,', izi,(14-1/1/ /0 4/s)-'6, ,L-- ,g,t//ii lg. /71'
J //tvvr,e (.'/4C1 'it' 30./' NO r /-i,twee/ iN� ,,,od � ktvf
,o(ac / 6,uS ft S
r tinC4 r9LJ) 'or- e0 i .7-
I NO k). ,�'A I/o v/6 Li / f3P.a, e PA- e. ,Yvt y,,
J S 1,-A-,. ' 1�- Q.� cAL.t.>A, /D4(4� PLt7FFS rSztho EDE'/ P2,giedE , KI^I
: �,)„,/y,,( .- L,:.t�/./t/� A,.: 7`/ RI,F /2/cd !clr. ,/`,c' , .+�/,- l
- -((,�` ,.(//()77;,,, , (, /: ':?V `>!-/�. /1 ( � 1,-,, /r/ //
)\/•t_4_,L 1.,y- `<:�:_. //'.4 7 C ./ l' pi , /;. -'" l ., .
•
i s � ; , ,,
I//('1,r,_4-/,.,7, /,;—/.,/ // ../
��- - )(7 4 0,� bti4t-f `, 1 1-L( 3!
_r 1:1/. -N.,,, . , ..., , �' '4"1) 1
tt � 1
( , 7
(,IL'ii ), (/,.vr-'ir(...L •')Zs</ /,h(4,(j . /c l/T'f _
J(Q av�d� l7 tip
We the undersigned petitioners are in opposition to the proposal
of changing Bluffs Boulevard to West Bluffs Boulevard and are
opposed to any change in the name of Bluffs Boulevard. ,�
s
NAME ADDRESS
, ,
ICXc/f1-4, /& Y/ 1YLv .F rs f3/,,,1
a„cLAIdiefr /O4 8k86s 8/1el.
►e , .A,,,, �/,�'!0 .1., � i0`172 � I, {'S Ql��..
w %.8>�,rn. ('• CO /0 c17 6 LcL I.Stcri .,
/ y , %%
) 2h/{,,��4,e i. /()>-60 A/ , ✓J /- /(A
`,q//24 1,t� /014 .131oc ,5 ,(t)ci.
..
(Li•c A—L4L_._ 1 CLai ,;. , (3 ., . Jo '(F # 4
;x t ;t ' z /Z'4/(7 z ?/i :/N
y Z �L.s tiL /7' 7•Z Rit, (1 � /'/u,-i, ..
,:.L• G�=;,.4j /o�{7[, k. ,
g._0 S?it C • " -1
I _
�i •
We the undersigned petitioners are in opposition to the proposal
of changing Bluffs Boulevard to West Bluffs Boulevard and are .�--"
opposed to any change in the name of Bluffs Boulevard. ?'
, .,.q NAME ADDRESS
' ' C . 1tC�
,h� 7/• 4-.3.-- IC' (-' 15 i J(t )1 u
1'
Yn/`1% c c �_>6 ,. '.' / <:r' . .,-t -
i
a �7 r :r. �2GG,4., t si3O
\�
,.., - z c,..:,,,,., ,,, 6344,s/,,s,.6(.0. . _
a
J u
`,i . `_ , /C2,2�6 o�.ldr s ,.[vim O . . ,
- 0 IK"V4)- i ‘ Z,v
` 5't z.' 1 c. z ;,:z-
' / )c\ '`c 'r- k. �ir-� \r'."b7. \. -\ 'Ch '`c\ ,
/ z
Y'c' , 4i " ICZ73 g(cLri 5 /3Ltl.1)
. nt_ 1,ck(t -.(1( l Wok. loa1V PL�.�4'de lei1'ca. ,
•
We the undersigned petitioners are in opposition to the proposal
of changing Bluffs Boulevard to West Bluffs Boulevard and are
opposed to any change in the name of Bluffs Boulevard.
NAME ADDRESS
.re41
f
'°yu 2)av /6 4 114 .64 toffs $l.u 0 601p Ph(l ieL.
QTh 7A;
• Z: Aso .eriiA liiJ1004P
J043Z 6,,cos Ado., 406,0 AA,eit Mu. 5530
Z �I�CLw t /Usc?2 �/3/)1 'fdw, Aa4 oft)S:s3e,E
c7�.t. K++�.�G /D�. i �Lr f�!iiv 7QwLes S S
r _ /09w l lvt `tom 't sr39 '
70 l lugs ,!/`.A• szciy
4
1 _
19w
We the undersigned petitioners are in opposition to the proposal
of changing Bluffs Boulevard to West Bluffs Boulevard and are
opposed to any change in the name of Bluffs Boulevard.
•
NAME ADDRESS
/)
3 7 'V�"��ij�o /�/�+C,
to36Sc 1-suFPs' vn
✓fr-� /4368 AziFf5'
1D36o FFS QcilC> • _
•
2 o---f 7 ,DoNq
We the undersigned petitioners are in opposition to the proposal
of changing Bluffs Boulevard to West Bluffs Boulevard and are
opposed to any change in the name of Bluffs Boulevard. }y\
•
NAME ADDRESS
,,4440E It) /O 171,1-- 14" .y
41161 - S1,P4in
4--••• vn,«� /d</177 re in 4 n-T
.. /OfLo 7 Q.
icy)1 DOA/
f
•
•
14242 chestnut Dr.
Eden Prairie, 61n 55344
AUG 4 1980 July 20, 1QAo
,,.ity ,;nuncil
city of Eden Prairie
Hennepin k;ountyA, minnesnta
To: �4fl �;�"i1i 1W C4u W i/sci ii • .
'finis letter is basically in reference to the nublic hearing nn
oevolonment, Inc. 's request for PUD Jnrcent anprnvai for
rinrle 'amity, towniin'is•'s, condominium, and community commereial-
upon m 00 acres, rr--r.?ng from Rural to RM 2.5 and rreliminany
.,Tat a' rn-vnl. (Deer creel')
i am orrored to three rarts of the proposal. First, I think that
the en -0; and swami area should be left as a protected wild life •
:area. I have often gone cross-country skiing and hi'ring in this
area. On most visits, varying with the season, one can see mnauon
:'n '; deer, ohno ':' ', rabbits, ducks, herons, etc. I feel tilat
this wildlife area is an asset to the uitv of Eden Prairie and its
an shou'd he destroyed by development.
nc^r:dly, I am opposed to community commercial development in a
residential area because of the following reasons:
1-adequate shopping exists nearby
2-hrin^s in people from outside or the neighborhood who often are
not concerned with the residents goals of neighborhood nreser•:a"nn.
3-a cammnreial area has already been developed along Highway 5 that
con house community commercial.
4-community commercial,if a dairy store, is a frequent target for
robberies which are not desirable in any neighborhood.
My third point of concern is the increasing population density
in the area of chestnut Drive and environs. Presently there are
120 units at Chestnut Apartments, about 84 units at Atherton,
60 some in development at the Old Farmhouse site, and, again
under construction, 64 at Burning Tree. (about 214 of these
units exit only onto Chestnut Drive) As you consider the anprnval
of the Deer Creek properties, I sincerely hone you will consider •
the problems created by over density of population and allow
no further building of apartments and condominiums in this area.
I, also have some comments to make on develnner's promises made •
at previous council and planning meetings. The uPT developers .
said they would screon their building with landscaping. To date.
I see very tall weeds and dead trees on the Scenic Heights hnulevard
or the uPT site. Th^ developers of the Old Farmhouse rite said
they would leave trees standing in their project. Presently, •
95% of the trees have been removed. As an Eden Prairie resident,
I am concerned about the unwillinc*.ness of developers to carry nut
three promises.
.nlnk you for reading my comments. •
August 19, 1980
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
( HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO R80-154
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR 8I0S (I.C. 51-386)
•
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and •
specifications for the following improvement, to wit,
I.C. 51-386, Utility improvements along T.H. 101
north of Valley View Rd.
and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
• OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in
( the official paper and in the Construction 8ulletin an
advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement
under such approved plans and specifications. The adver-
tisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify
the work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened
at 10:00 o'clock A.M. on Thursday, September 18, 1980, and
considered by the Council at 7:30 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday
October 7, 1980, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall,
and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and
filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit,
cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to
the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
•
ATTEST:
Wolfgang H. Penzel,.Mayor
SEAL •
•
•
John D. Frane, Clerk
August 19, 1960
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. RBO-156
RESOLUTION.APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS (I.C. 51-353A)
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications
for the following improvement, to wit,
I.C. 51-353A, Street improvements in Hipp's Mitchell
Heights 4th Addition
and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in
the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an
advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement
under such approved plans and specifications. The adver-
tisement shall be published for 10 days, shall specify
the work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened
at 10:DO o'clock A.M. on Thursday, September 11, 1960, and
considered by the Council at 7:30 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday
September 16, 19B0, in the Council Chambers of the City
Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed
and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit,
cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to
the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
ATTEST:
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
August 19, 1980
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R80-157
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND 0.
SPECIFICATIDNS AND ORDERING ADVER-
TISEMENT
FOR BIDS (I.C. 51-383)
WHEREAS, the City Engineer, through Rieke Carroll Muller, Assoc.,
has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvement, to wit,
I.C. 51-383, Utility and street
• improvements in Rymarland Camp,2nd Add•
and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval:
NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in
the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an
advertisement far bids upon the making of such improvement
under such approved plans and specifications. The adver-
tisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specidy•
the work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened
at 10:00 o'clock A.M. on Thursday, Sept. 12; 1980, and con-
sidered by the Council at 7:30 o'clock P.M: on Tuesday, -
Sept. 16, 1980, in the Council Chambers of the Ciyt Hall,
and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and
filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit,
cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to
the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
•
Wolfgang H. Penzef, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
i
1
• 1
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA S
p.
' RESOLUTION NO. R80-158 i
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,
the following persons have agreed to serve as election judges and
are appointed for the Primary Election, September 9, 1980.
*Indicated Precinct Chairperson.
PRECINCT I KING OF GLORY LUTHERAN CHURCH
Vc Loretta Ellison 16920 So. Shore Lane 934-3060
Dolores Klien 15701 No. Lund Road 934-9124
Lorraine Raths 10960 So. Shore Lane 934-2224
Cheryl Glisczinski 7152 Ticonderoga Trail 934-2195
Rosemary Dysinger 15613 No. Lund Road 934-9076
Bernadette Ploumen 17040 So. Shore Lane 934-2391
Pi
PRECINCT II IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH 1
I
* Sue Lane 6961 Alpine Trail 937-1669
Mary Upton 16163 Edenwood Drive 937-2938 4
Gretta Zumburge 16060 Alpine Way 937-2946
Ann Gay Parker 16191 S. Hillcrest Court 937-8888
Vi Johnson 16176 Edenwood Drive 937-2848 ?
( Barb Johnson 7660 Atherton Way 937-8994 i
PRECINCT III FOREST HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1
4k Doris Johnson 14315 Crown Drive 937-2287
Margaret Bye 6530 Leesborough Ave 937-1277
Joanne Carlin 6890 Canterbury Lane 937-8828
Ruth Mital 12762 Gordon Drive 944-3481
Jan Anderson 6591 Manchester Lane 937-1271
Barbara Walker 6640 Manchester Lane 937-2171
PRECINCT IV EDEN PRAIRIE METHODIST CHURCH
+a Ginny Gibson 15737 Cedar Ridge Road 937-1374
Betty Fritz 8226 Tamarack Trail 937-2480
Evelyn Rogers 9100 Eden Prairie Road 937-2992
Shirley Jellison 9560 Highview Drive 934-0934
Sharon Levitt 8406 Hiawatha Avenue 937-2872
Virginia Gartner 15701 Cedar Ridge Road 937-1595
PRECINCT V EDEN PRAIRIE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
ik Sharon Lynch 11426•Leona Road 941-2792
Adeline Bramwell 14329 Fairway Drive 937-8987
Margaret Kruger 14311 Fairway Drive 937-8261
Sue Marth 8719 Bentwood Drive 944-3140
Mildred Clark 8779 Basswood Road 941-3269
Barbara Vanderploeg 8735 Leeward Circle 941-5363
Resolution No. R80-158
Page two
PRECINCT VI SOUTH SUBURBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY VO-TECH
Edna Walker 8952C Neill Lake Road 941-6479
Joy Brekke 10091 Homeward Hills 941-4547
Barbara Higgins 11260 Windrow Drive 941-5273
Marion Nesbitt 8701 Black Maple Drive 941-2387
Florence Kral 9123 Neill Lake Road 941-7312
Gloria Pond 8819 Darnel Road 941-5148
COUNTING CENTER EDEN PRAIRIE CITY HALL
• Jane Rohe 15903 No. Eden Drive 934-2765
Perry Forester 9505 Highview Drive 934-0938
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council this 19th day of
August, 1980.
•
•
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
•
John D. Frane, City Clerk
•
•
I99'
•
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John Frane
DATE: August 1, 1980
•
RE: Revenue Sharing Hearing
Our revenue sharing allocation for 1981 should be approximately the same
as in 1980 - $137,636. In previous years the City has committed these
funds for current expenses of the Public Safety Department, one of the
uses permitted under Federal Regulation. I suggest, as an expediency,
we do the same for our 1981 allocation.
ICMq
B-T LAND COMPANY
1055 EAST WAYZATA BOULEVARD
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 J�
16121 4734511
August 14, 1980
Eden Prairie Mayor and City Council Members
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55343
•
Dear Mayor and City Council Members:
This letter will serve as our request for a continuance on the August 19,
1980 City Council meeting until the September 2, 1980 City Council meeting.
We feel this continuance is necessary to provide us with time to create
and prepare a conceptual buffering plan for the western boundary of our
Timber Creek proposal.
We feel this is necessary in light of concerns raised at the August 8,
1980 Planning Commission meeting as the two dissenting votes were both
cast because they felt the proposed condominiums on our western boundary
may be too close to a potential single-family area.
In the park land located in our southwestern corner we feel that •
there is sufficient buffering through the park dedication land from the
existing single-family area which abuts our property at that point. We
feel that by the use of landscaping and berming that the open space farther
to the north on our western boundary can effectively be buffered by berming
and landscaping within our current proposal.
We feel that our plat conforms with your City's Comprehensive Land •
Use Plan, your City's Comprehensive Thoroughfare Plan, and your City's
Comprehensive Utilities Plan, has a unanimous recommendation from your City
Park Comnission.and has a positive recommendation from your City Planning
Commission that this concept plan should be approved.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
B-T L D COMPANY
•
•
Rick D. Murray
Vice President
RDM/lg •
Unapproved
Planning Commission Minutes -2- August 11, 1980
MEMBERS ABSENT: .Gartner
B. TIMBER CREEK, by B-T Land Company. Request for Planned Unit
Development approval on 150 acres of land for single family
& multiple residential, park land, and open space uses. Lo-
cated North of Duck Lake Trail, West of Co. Rd. 4 and South
of Townline Road. A public hearing.
The Planner explained that the proponent had revised the original plan according to
Commission recommendations, reviewed the staff report dated 8/8/80, and stated that
new public hearing notices had been sent. The Planner introduced Rick Murray, 1
representing B-T Land Company and Jack Lynch, Land Planner.
Lynch reviewed the history from the previous meeting and reviewed the major concerns.
He also reviewed the revisions of the plan. Additional accesses had been added to
the parks, a through road had been added to connect with future development to the
west. And to respond to the Planning Commission concerns regarding the proximity
of a number of quad homes to the vacant land to the west, they had added an 80'
buffer area and clustered the units into a condominium type to increase open space
between units. He stated that they would submit detailed buffering plans with a
zoning proposal.
The Planner suggested to the Commission that they refer to items in the 4/9/80
staff report and 8/8/8D staff report while they are making motions.
Bentley stated that he felt that eightplexes do not allow the plan to conform with
the Comprehensive Guide Plan.
The Planner stated that the density is under 2 units/acre and that the Guide Plan
makes provision for clustering of units to promote variety and preserve open space.
Lynch stated that the density has not changed although the distance to the proper-
ties, building mass and the building design has. He also stated that the eightplexe
has 4 units on the top and 4 units on the bottom, which ranges from 960 sq. ft. to
1300 sq. ft. each.
Levitt asked about the maintenance of the eightplexes. Lynch stated that there
will be an over all Home Owner's Association, and three subordinate building main-
tenance associations.
Joe Morin, 18520 South Eden Drive, presented a petition and report from the residents
entitled, Resident's Report to The Eden Prairie Planning Commission on The Timber
Creek Development. Morin also read this report dated August 11, 1980 and asked that
it be made part of the record.
William Kannenberg, 15909 West 62nd Street, stated that if the 'Wilderness Park'
Concept proposed by Morin were adopted, the residents south of the creek could
obtain access to it by construction of a floating boardwalk.
Steve Stensgaard, 6544 Eden Prairie Road, felt that the proposed road access to
Co. Rd. 4 would be dangerous.
The Planner responded that the County had reviewed the access and found it accept-
able, however, the proponent would be required to .add turn lanes and by-pass lanes
to Co. Rd. 4.
Elanore McKewan, 16730 Baywood Terrace, felt that the proposal should be reviewed
as two separate proposals north and south.
200/
.i_
Unapproved
Planning Commission Minutes -3- August 11, 1980
1 4
Bearman asked how many units there would be south of the creek and on how many
acres. The Planner stated that there are 179 units south of the creek on 94 acres;
' 2 units/acres would allow a possibility of 188 units.
Mrs. James Pedric, 15816 North Lund Road, felt that the only reason multiple was
being considered south of the creek was to allow the developer to make more money. s
Paul Choiniere, 15819 North Eden Drive, stated that he is opposed to PUD's in general, 1
because in the east they have not been successful.
I
Bearman stated that a P.U.D. here is different, because it is not a zone but a process. ;1
for allowing mixed land use, each use to be zoned to an appropriate zoning catagory.
Michael Reuter, 66D2 Rainbow Drive, asked if Co. Rd. 4 can handle the additional
traffic. a
Levitt asked if there would be a realigning of the intersection of Co. Rd. 4 and i
Duck Lake Trail. The Planner stated that there would be a wi$ening of Duck Lake
Trail to the south to allow Duck Lake Trail to make a safe 90 angle with Co. Rd.
4.
Since many questions were being asked that had been covered in the original
public hearing, the Planner highlighted the 4/9/80 staff report, regarding traffic 1
( concerns.
Curtis Knutson, 6511 Undestad Street, would rather see single family as a buffer 1
to the west and he also feels there is a traffic problem on Co. Rd. 4. ,
John Price, 16680 Honeysuckle Lane, feels there should be two parks as in the Plan.
William Kannenberg, 15909 W. 62nd Street, asked why it is necessary to have multiple
dwellings anywhere in the City. The Planner stated that the Comprehensive Guide Plan 1
allows multiple dwellings to provide a variety of housing opportunity.
Levitt expressed his concern that some oeonle that signed the petition might not I
have understood that the proposal was to remove the Dark from the south area and
place it in the north.
John Beal, 15820 Oak Ridge Road, stated that 94% of the people in the area contacted
signed the petition and that it was explained to them,
Tim Pierce, 16669 Honeysuckle Lane, asked what the density of the area adjacent
to Country Vista was. Lynch replied no development abuts any existing family;
10 acres of park abut Country Vista.
Peter DiBona, 15809 Park Terrace Drive, commented that he feels that the condominiums i
will become ghettos.
( Torjesen asked the people if they wanted a wilderness oark on the north side of
the creek, would it not also be more fair to distribute additional density up
there.
2 002
1
Unapproved
Planning Commission Minutes -4- August 11, 1980
Paul Choiniere, 15819 North Lund Road, felt that because of natural springs in the
northern area, that it would be unsuitable for townhouses.
Rick Murray, 8-T Land Company, stated that actually the ability to cluster multiple
units north of the creek on the buildable areas would be more feasible than the
scattered large lot single family proposed. He summarized the changes they had
responeded to and urged the Planning Commission to recommend approval of the P.U.O.
to the City Council. He felt the resedents' park proposal was really exclusive
of his current request.
Motion 1
[Vitt moved to close the public hearing on Tlmber Creek. Sutliff seconded, motion
carried 6-0.
Motion 2
Levitt moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the revised PUD Concept
based upon the plan dated 7/24/80, the 4/9/80 staff report, the 7/22/80 memo from
BRW, and the 8/8/80 staff memo. Sutliff seconded.
DISCUSSION
Levitt felt that there are two over-riding issues, which are, land use and whether
there was to be two parks as voted on in the bond issue, or some large wilderness
park as proposed by the residents.
Bentley asked Levitt if he would include the removal of condominiums from the
southwest further to the east. Levitt replied no.
Bentley moved to amend the motion to move the condaninium units (south of the.creek) .... ....
further away from the future single family area occurring to the west. Torjesen
seconded, motion failed, 3-3. Levitt, Retterath, and Bearman voted no. •
-
The original unamended motion carried 4-2. Torjesen and Bentley voted no.
2QV3
•
APPROVED (MUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COI:r,ISSION
M0NDAY, JULY 7, 1980 7:30 P.M., CITY HALL
•
CON ISSION Liam PR SE:;T: Richard Anderson, Chairperson; Pat Breitenstein,
Robert Johnson, Dr. George Tangen, Larry
Vanlbeter
COWISSI01? IZZERS ABSENT: Gloria Pond, Marge Friederichs
CO? ;ISSI0N STAFF PRE:MIT: Robert Lambert, Directory of Community Services -
OTHERS PRESENT: Dick Dahl, Eden Prairie News
• Jack Lynch, BRW Architects
B. Reports of Staff
1. Development Proposal
a. Timber Creek
Lambert referred to Staff Memo of June 23, 1980, pointing out
• that this development is back on the agenda tonight after being
rejected by the Commission at the June 16 meeting. Lambert
indicated to the developer after the June 16 meeting, that he
felt the Commissions, two major concerns were access to the •
• northern most park and preserving the knoll to the north—
west. The developer said he had already dedicated more
than the 10;; minimum park land established by the City
• ordinance, therefore he would only sell the }atoll property.
The developer did improve access to the two parks since
the last meeting and has provided access to the floodplain
as well.
•
Jack Lynch (BRW) was present representing the developer
and said they have been working with the City Staff for over
6 months on this proposal, so now the developer needs
direction from the Commission if this proposal does not
fit the needs of the Community.
R. Anderson asked how this neighborhood park proposal serves
the residents compared to other neighborhood parks in the
City. Lambert replied better than most. He further
explained that neighborhood parks serve about a mile
radius and because the• service area in this proposal is •
divided by a road and a creek, the parks were divided as
well and service about a a mile radius.
l
20
Minutes - Parks, Recreation & approved
Natural Resources Commission -2- July 7,1980 •
Lambert agreed with the neighbors present at the last meeting
that the high hill northwest of the northern most part of
the site is beautiful, but the only way it could be pre-
served in open space rather than be developed is if the City
purchaac:: '':e iesci. Lambert said that these sites are neighbor-
hood parks that care developed for providing active park space
for the residents, and preservation of the knoll would provide
very limited park use. If good active park space is not planned
now, residents will demand it in the future and then there will
be no land available for it.
Resident Paul Choiniere commented that Birch Island Park,
a community park serving residents in this area, does not
have good access from the west as it is so dangerous to cross
County Road 4. He also said there is no buffer planned in
this development for the neighbors to the northeast of the
site. Choiniere commented that the knoll on this site was ;.
included in a past bond issue and now those plans have
ohanged.
Lambert responded to kr. Choinierels comments as follows:
Birch Island Park '.:as included in the 1969 bond issue as a
community park, however it has limited active use. Lambert
said the Timber Creek parks (formerly Eden Farms East and West)
were included in the 1979 park bond issue as two parks. The
unsuccessful 1975 park bond issue included a single 20 acre
( park referred to as Eden Farms.
He also pointed out that the Citydoes not provide a buffer
if the lots are of similar character, as in this case
residential.
Resident Joe Morin asked if Round Lake Park is.within
walking distance and could be considered an active use area
for this development. Lambert said it is about 1 mile away
which puts it outside of the neighborhood park-1 mile radius.
Breitenstein stated that she feels there•is a great need
for a park along Duck Lake Trail as this proposal would
provide.
MOTION: Breitenstein moved to recommend the Council
approve the Timber Creek Development Proposal as presented
this evening. Johnson seconded the motion and it carried
unanimously.
DISCUSSION: Resident Choiniere said that the notice of the
last park bond issue was received by residents the day of
the election, thus providing no opportunity to respond (he
specified that this statement be put on the records). He
also expressed concern that proper park provisions were not
made in the past for residents to the west of this develop-
ment thus why should this developer have to provide for what
was not planned before.
2oCJ j
•
•
Minutes - Parks, Recreation & approved
Natural Resources Commission -3- July 7, 1980
Tangen asked that the records reflect that though he was not
present at the last meeting he has read the June 16 mir.'res
carefully and stands knowledgeable in approving this prc?csaI.
Resident ;:orin said that the representative of the developer
said, after the June 16 meeting, that he would arrange a
meeting with concerned residents and he never followed
through on this.
R. Anderson asked that comments close as the vote has been
made. Re said he walked over the site personally, and feels
the vote was a responsible one and that residents surrounding
this development have more parks and open space as a result
of this proposal than most other puts of the Cit;;. Andorson
suggested that residents approach the Council (call them before
the meeting) about this issue if they are dissatisfied, as tho
Council has the final decision on approving this proposal.
•
•
•
200L
+-
\ � . •
1
Minutes - Parks, Recreation do approved June 16, 1990
Natural Resources Commission -2-
MEMBERS ABSENT: Tangen and Van Meter
B. Reports of Staff
1. Development Proposals i
a. Timber Creek
Lambert introduced Jack Lynch of BRIT Architects, and Rick
. Murray of B-T Land Co., developer of the project.
Lynoh gave a brief overview of the 150 acre project. He said d
there are a total of 258 residential units planned, 136 being
single family, 120 quadraminiums, 48 eightlex units. There
are 2 parks planned, one approximately 7- acres, and the other
approximate) 10 acres. Thirty-five acres of the site are in
conservancy/flood plain and will be left in a natural state.
This plan works out to a density of 1.72 including the parks. t
The north and south portions of the development are each served i
by a loop road. At this point the architect opened up the i
discussion to the Commission.members and general public. s
There were approximately 30 members of the general publio present. 1
Resident Chris Rodenkirchen, 15554 Park Terrace Drive, asked 1
if all the lots in the development are over the 13,500 sq. ft. i.
minimum set by the City. Lynch replied that all the lots on
the north side of the flood plain are at least 13,500 sq. ft., '
but some on the south side are not due to the configuration of 3
the land. Rick Murray stepped forward to explain that some of l
the lot sizes are smaller in order to save the environmentally !.
sensitive areas and not infringe on,the flood plain.
Lambert added that the 13,500 r..-. ft. lot size is a minimum
established for straight zoning development. Staff feels the
developer has made an acceptable effort to preserve the environ-
mentally sensitive areas of this site through the PUB request.
Resident Rodenkirchen asked in what order development would
oocur—first single family, then multiple, or what? Lynch
and Murray pointed out that B-T Land is a developer and not a
home builder. B-T Land will sell finished areas (utilities in)
to contractors, builders, or individuals to purchase and build
on so they will have no control over the order of development .
Resident Joseph Morin, 15820 South Eden Drive, asked what the
"conservancy" area represents as shown in the plan. Lambert
explained that conservancy land is acreage set aside on either
side of Purgatory Creek to be left in an undisturbed or
natural state. Be further explained that when a development
proposal is considered, the City compares the proposal to the
oonservancy guidelines outlined in the Brauer Purgatory Creek
( Study done for Eden Prairie in 1976. Specifically, for the
•
Minutes — Parks, Recreation & approved June 16, 1980
Natural Resources Commission -3-
i
area of this proposal, the Brauer Study suggested 60 acres per
'lineal mile of Creek be set aside as conservancy area. As
this development is proposed, the conservancy area is 80 acres y
per lineal mile.
Resident William Kannenberg, 15909 W. 62nd St., asked what
will happen to W. 62nd St. as far as upgrading, etc., if this
development is approved. R. Anderson said it is not the role
of this Commission to answer questions on roads. Lambert .
clarified this point saying that this Coamissicn is concerned
with park issues only i.e., sidewalks, trail systems and that
the natural resources of a site are being preserved, hills
maintained, eto. • He suggested that perhaps the question of
roads be brought to the Planning Commission instead.
Resident Morin felt serious attention should be given to the
• hill area of the site (north) where single family lots are
planned, and consider it instead for park land. He said it
is a beautiful knoll and in his opinion not suitable for
development. Rick Murray stated that they have worked with
the City for 6 months on this proposal and have exceeded the 10%
required park land dedication.
Lambert gave some background on this property. In the past,
the City had this property appraised and the Council voted
not to purchase it for park land. Also, according to the
City's overall park and open space plan, this proposal offers
'more park land than the City had originally designated.
Lambert suggested that if the residents feel strongly enough,
they should petition for more park land, if this is their
desire, and bring their petition to the Council for consideration.
Resident Paul Choiniere, 15819 North Widen Drive, said there
are still 185 existing homes in this area that don't have a
park. He said this area was originally going to serve the
residents of Paradise Valley, and now the Park Commission is
not following through on the park plan. He further pointed out
that there is not access to the proposed park for neighbors of
the area and these people should have park service.
R. Anderson pointed out that when the 1975 park bond referendum
to purchase park land in this area failed, nothing more could
be done. Then, when the City was updating the guideplan in
1979, Drawer& Associates held public meetings for citizen
input. It was in the Guide Plan Update of 1979 where the
change occurred to make two parks (east & west) on this
property instead of one park.
Residents, led by Mr. Choiniere, said at this point that they
• were not notified of the public meetings therefore not well
represented.
•
2002
Linutes -Parks, Recreation & ,approved June 16, 1980
natural Resources Commission -4-
Resident Rodenkirchen stated that in his opinion, the main
problem with this proposal is access by neighbors in the area. ,
There should be good pedestrian and bike access, and Townline
Road is already so heavily travelled it should not be expected
to handle more traffic.
Lambert asked for a specific suggestion from Mr. Rodenkirchen
to help solve the problems he speaks of. Rodenkirchen
said widening and improvement of Townline Road. •
Resident klilliam 1(annenberg said that as the proposal is now, •
these parks are private. He also asked about access to the
Creek and is there a bike path planned along the Creek so
others could enjoy this natural amenity. Mr. Kannenberg
asked if an environmental impact study was ever done for this
area--as to what would happen to the wildlife if development
occurred. Also, what kind of parks will these be, playground
or nature areas.
Lambert responded that an environmental impact study is not required
for this area. As far as the type of parks built, con-
cept
plans will be designed for these parks, and neighborhoods
will be notified for concept review. The final plan is then
developed reflecting the needs and desires of the neighborhood.
Lambert reminded the audience that these are defined as
"neighborhood" parks to serve a z mile radius, not community
parks which serve a large portion of the population.
R. Anderson asked residents to voice opinions tonight on what
kind of parks they want.
Resident Morin wants to see park area expanded to include
part of the hill (north side of flood plain) and to see access
from the east implemented.
R. Anderson asked how the Creek valley (conservancy area) is
proposed to be used. Lambert said people will own the lots
but the conservancy is considered a "no-build" area. The
developer has already dedicated park land so nothing is
planned for the flood plain in the Creek area. Lainbert further
said that with most proposals along the Creek, the flood plain
is dedicated to the City, but this developer has not committed
anything to this effect as yet.
R. Anderson said he feels the Creek should have been access
from the east.
Resident Choiniere expressed feelings that the park dedication
of this proposal should be restructured with more attention
given to the Park and Open Space Stidy. He feels this proposal
is too incomplete for action to be taken at this time.
200(3)
•ti
•
10
linutes - Parks, Recreation &
approved June 16, 1980
Natural Resources Commission -5-
i
Lambert reminded the Commission that the Parks do Open Space
Study Nr. Choiniere refers to is only schematio, and the
City's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (1979 - 1983) does
include these two parks.
•
Resident Harold Trocke, 15801 W. 62nd St., said he has lived
in this area for 15 years and there has never been a park
for kids near him. Now a new development is proposed and
parks are planned for a few residents that aren't even living
there yet. Kr. Trocke feels the entire hibl.area (north side
of Creek) should be park space and left in its natural state. •
ii
Johnson asked Lambert if he is satisfied with the layout of
this development proposal. Lambert answered, yes.
Pond expressed feeling that It is reasonable these residents
get what they want, and the new residents can decide when they
buy a lot whether they like the arrangement or not. Existing
residents should have more consideration on matters like this.
NOTION: Pond moved to recommend that the Council reject this pro-
posal
because the residents already living in this area should have
more consideration than the people yet to owe. R. Anderson
seconded the motion. The motion was approved 4 to 1, with all
voting "aye" except Dave Anderson voted "naye";
v.
2010
•
MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
approved
Monday, April 14, 1980 7:30 PM City Hall
COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman William 8earman, George Bentley,
Matthew Levitt, Virginia Gartner, Liz
Retterath, and Grant Sutliff
COMMISSION MEMBERS ON
LEAVE OF ABSENCE: Hakon Torjesen
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
Jeanie Ohnsorg, Planning Secretary
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Retterath moved, Bentley seconded to approve the agenda
as submitted. Motion carried 6 - 0.
II. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF MARCH 24, 1960
Corrections: Page 1 fourth motion should state that it carried
6 - 0. Same page second to last paragraph the word "aliminated" .
should be "eliminated". Page 2, paragraph 2 "tevit" should be
spelled "Levitt". Page 4, first paragraph the words "would be"
should be added to the first sentence.
MOTION: Retterath moved, Sutliff seconded to approve the minutes
as corrected. Motion carried 6 - 0
III. MEMBERS REPORTS
NONE
IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
A. TIMBER CREEK, by B-T Land Company. Request for Planned Unit
Development approval on 150 acres for 136 single family, 166
Townhome units, and park and open space uses. A continued
public hearing.
Jack Lynch, Bather, Ringroase, Woldsfeld, Jarvis, gave a brief
.presentation explaining the changes in the development proposals.
( • The Planner went over the staff report dated April 9. 1980.
Levitt inquired about the density of this project.
•
2011
Planning Commission Minutes -2- April 14, 1980
The Planner went over the various ways to look at the density
of this project. He explained that the overall gross density
of this project is 1.69 units/acre.
Bentley inquired what type of vegetation there is on this
site, and if any plans were made for vegetation preservation.
The Planner explained that the southern site had a mixed
hardwood forest. The townhome lots would have to be made
larger if portions of the woods were to be preserved.
Bentley inquired what type of construction,if any, was allowed
in the conservancy zone.
The Planner replied that the Conservancy line was a 'no build'
line beyond which there should be no grading, cutting of vege-
tation or building construction.
• 4
Retterath inquired about the encroachment into the flood plain. 9
Lynch replied that there will be no building within the flood
plain but,that the proposed single family home lot lines in
the southern portion of this project will extend into the flood
plain.
Levitt inquired if it were possible for the two cul-de-sacs in
the northern section of the southwestly portion of this site i
to be connected to form a through road.
The Planner stated that because of substaintial grade change
between these two cul-de-sacs it would not be possible.
Levitt inquired how residents other than those who will live
in the proposed project will obtain access to the parks.
The Planner replied that the parks are adjoining existing
development. Because of very round-about road systems only the
central 1/3 of the subdivision will have direct access to the
northern park. The balance of the existing residential area
could benefit from access easements which the City may choose
to negotiate.
Levitt stated that he feels the townhomes are screened well
from the existing single family homes with the exception of
those in the north and stated that he feels something should
be done to screen them as well.
Paul Choiniere, 15819 North Eden Drive, stated that he felt the
park areas should be designed so they can be used for winter
acitivities as well as summer ones. He stated that most parks
are ball fields or tennis courts and the childern no longer
have a place to slide in the winter. He also stated that
he does not feel the lots should encroach into the flood plain.
Mike Reuter, 6602 Rainbow Drive, stated that he felt before
any type of development was done on this site some type of
road improvements should be done on Townline Road.
u�rZ
•
Planning Commission Minutes -3- April 14, 1980
(
The Planner stated that the City has requested that the
developer pave Townline Road to his western boundary at the
time of development of the northern parcel. He also stated
that the City is continuing to work with Minnetonka and
Hennepin County to develop a program of contruction for
improvement of Townline Road.
Greg Beauvais, 15724 Park Terrace Drive, stated that he also 7.
is concerned about the park access to residents other than
those which will live in the proposed_,development.
Steve Stensgaard, 6544 Eden Prairie Road, stated that he
would like to see the townhomes completely removed from this
project.
Paul Brown 17100 Duck Lake Trail, inquired about the access to
County Road 4.
The Planner stated that Hennepin County had reviewed to site
lines for this access and felt, with widening on both sides of
the road for by-pass, acceleration and deceleration lanes, the
access would be safe.
MOTION: Bentley moved, Gartner seconded to close the public
hearing. Motion carried 6 - 0.
MOTION: Bentley moved to recommend to the City Council
approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept illustrating
253 total residential units per the plat dated 3-24-80, per
the reconmendations of the staff report dated 4-9-80. Bearman
relinquished the chair to Retterath, and seconded the motion.
Motion tied 3 - 3. (Bentley. Bearman, and Levitt voting
aye) (Retterath, Gartner, and Sutliff voting nay)
MOTION: Bentley moved, Gartner seconded to recommend to the
City Council approval of the E.A.W. for the Timber Creek
property. Motion carried 6 - 0.
•
•
2013
•
I '
:•,y,r.i'; Ccrmissicn Minutes -2- N+rch 24, 1:
MEMBERS OF LEAVE OF ANSENCE: Hakon Torjesen
i V. MEMBERS REPORT
NONE •
VI. DEVELO1-MENT PROPOSALS
�TIMBER CREEK, by B-T Land Company. Request for Planned Unit
Develop;r.ent approval on 150 acres for 136 single family, 120
quadraminium units, 48 eightplex units, and 2.3 acres com-
munity commercial site. A continued public hearing.
Jack Lynch, B-T Land Company, gave a brief presentation of the
proposal. He explained that subsequent to the first Plannirig -
Commission meeting, they had revised their plan to respond to
the concerns of the residents and Commission. He then explained
the changes in the development proposal.
Levitt innuired about the density on the different areas of the
I proposal, and asked that this information be provided as a part
of the staff report.
Lynch stated that the density on the northern portion of this
site is 1.3 units/acre, and 2.9 units/acre on the souther por-
tion of the site excluding the land designated as parks.
•
Levitt inquired about the proposed access onto County Road 4
and the traffic impact this development would have on Trnmline
Road.
The Planner stated that this was currently under study and
information would be provided.
_'-nano r:dric, 15815 North Lund Road, stated she was also con-
ccrnc•c <'.•out the access to the park, from t1.e North Lund t:—ad
residents.
Gory Corder 6717 168 Avenue,•Nest, inquired to what dcciie
tation i;as to be preserved.
Mr. Lynch stated in the northern area little mass 9redinn -a
expected and since the plan was for large lot 0n0e f.gily,
that much of the vegetation would rer,ain. In tke ,•c t':: ,r
area, such of the vegetation would be r•c:::oved in ;iu. •.:t.-.-
minium area.
The Commission and residents had concerns over the access to
. the parks, enchroachment into the flood plain, and the m• ''cr
of cul-de-sacs.
MOTION: Retterath moved, Gartner seconded to continue the
201 Timber Creek public hearing to the April 14, 1980mcetinga:md
instructed the staff to prepare a report, Motion carried 6 - 0,
•
•
•
approved
Planning Commission Minutes -5- February 11, 1980
Members of Leave of Absence: Hakon Torjesen Members Absent: William Bearman & Oke
Martinson
( CJJ TIMBER CREEK, by B-T Land Company. Request for Planned Unit
Development approval on 1S0 acres for 136 single family, 120
quadraminiums units, 43 eightplex units, and a 2.3 acre com-
munity commercial site. A public hearing.
The Planner gave a brief smn:,ary of the rs r.';uest.
Peter Jarvis, From B.R.W. Engineers, gave a brief presentation 1
stating that this type of development (PUP) was apprr:cd in
1972 hut that because of some complication it was not followed
through.liE explained the number and type of units pronesed for I
this site and stated that they tried to set up a Mcettr.g with
the concerned neighboring residents but that the residents felt
that a meeting at this time was unnecessary.
Jack Lynch gave a brief presentation explaining the location
of the site and its various characteristics. lie explained the
drainage systems and utilities proposed. He then explained
the site plans and What was planned for the park area.
Greg Beauvais,15724 Park Terrace Drive irquired about the con-
( venicnce store and the amount of traffic• impact it would have
on County Road 4.
Jim Cardinal, 15701 West 62nd Street stated that he feels that
Eden Prairie does not have enough through streets, and that this
development simply connects two roads that arc already through
streets. He then inquired what amount of traffic impact this
development will have on Townline Road.
Mike Rcutter, 6602 Rainbow Drive, inquired if the developer is
proposing any type of road improvements for County Road 4. He
thcn stated that this development is for 150 acres 50 of which
is flood plain and inquired what type of impact this develop •
-
ment would have on the flood plain.
Gary Osullivan, 16690 Baywood Terrace, stated that he does not
feel that it is necessary to have a convenience store on this
development and inquired what the lot size was for the homes
planned for the northern part of this site. •
Bentley inquired if there were any plans for improvement of
County Road 4 in this area.
Levitt inquired if the developer had any plans for improve-
ment of Townline Road.
The Planner replied that these items would be addressed in a
staff report 2015
approved
Planning Conmisison Minutes -6- February 11, 1980
Paul Choinicrc, 15819 North Eden Drive, stated that he does not
. feel that ary type of development shaild go on this site, lie stated that he
was at the Planning Commission meetings in 1972 and the reason
that this development was not continued was because the Barr
• Engineering study was incomplete. He stated that in doing this
study they found that the type of soil density on the slopes
Would not hold this type of development. He also stated that
a great deal of lets back yard exposure rest into the high flood
plain area. He stated that Townline Rend is not designed in a
way that it could handle too much mere traffic. The area the
developer has recognized for a park is a glacial pond. He
inquired if this development is consistent with D.N.R and what
the County is planning for a Crosstown road.
John Price, 16680 Honeysuckle Lane. stated that he feels there
should be better transition in this development, that he lives
. in a single family home and that the developer is planning to
build quadraminiums on the land next to his home.
Paul Brown, 17100 Duck Lake Trail,-Jerry Corder 6717 16S Ave W.,
• Elenor HcKewan, 16730 Baywood,Terrace, D. Stucki, 15417 hest 62nd
Street, also stated that they arc concerned with the traffic im-
pact, the amount and type of units proposed, and that they arc
against any type of commercial on this site. .
Lane Kannenburg, 15909 West 62nd Street, inquired if the resi-
dence along Townline Road would be assessed for the water systems
proposed.
Gayle Clark, 1509 West 62nd Street, stated that there is a large
amount of wildlife and trees on this land mid inquired if any
type of preservation would he done. He also started that where
the developer is planning the convenience center there is an
old barn that he would like to see made into some type of
recreational facility rather than be torn down.
. Retterath inquired about the amount of grading that would have
to be done.
{ Gartner stated that she also is concerned about the intersection
of Townline Road and Duck Lake Trail and that she did not feel
there was a need for a commercial site in this develolwrent.
Jack Lynch, B.R.W. Engineering, gave a brief explanation of the
site and briefly addressed some of the concerns of the residents.
Bentley stated that he felt the following items should be ,
addressed before the next planning meeting:
1. The infringement on the flood plain.
. 2. The traffic, impact on Townline Road and County
Road 4.
•• - 3: If shoreland management requirements are met.
4. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet.
S. Preservation for the wildlife.
6. The size and number of cul-de-sacs.
7. The amount of usable park land.
B. The necessity of a convenience center
9. Density of the project.
MOTION: Bentley moved, Gartner seconded to continue the public
_. hharing on Timber Creek to the February 2S, 1980 meeting.
Motion carried 4 - 0. ---
• 2GI(.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council •
•
THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services '12446—
DATE: August 15, 1980
SUBJECT: Community Services Staff Comments Regarding Residents Report
to the Eden Prairie Planning Commission on Timber Creek
Development
The Community Services staff feels that it is necessary to provide the City
Council with staff comments regarding the residents report on the Timber
Creek Development as part of the City Council's review of this proposal.
Staff recognizes the concerns of the neighbors in wanting to preserve a very
beautiful natural area, but staff is forced to disagree with the rationale
for preservation. The rationale being used by the residents is basically
that they live in an older neighborhood that has never been provided with
a park. Birch Island Park is a 17 acre nature park that is adjacent to
Edenview and Kurtz Lane.
The Community Services staff recommended two neighborhood parks within this
development, because the purpose of neighborhood parks is to provide active
use areas within walking distance of children within the neighborhood. The
City has adopted a plan that defines a neighborhood park as "areas of intense
recreational activity intending to meet the needs of five to seventeen year olds.
Typical development includes play apparatus, field game areas, court games
and skating. Service area of one square mile." Due to the location of
Purgatory Creek dividing this area of the community, staff felt it made more
sense to provide two smaller neighborhood parks to serve both sides of the
creek. The service area of this park is generally west of the Chicago
Milwakee Railroad Line, north of Duck Lake Trail and east of Duck Lake Road.
The question that needs to be addressed at this time is: Is the wooded hill a
significant natural resource that should be preserved for public use?
If the City Council feels this hill should be preserved for public open space,
then that area should be added to the northern most neighborhood park. However,
staff feels that would be a mistake to eliminate the southern most park site
as a trade-off to preserve this hill. The active use park located on Ouck
Lake Trail will become a necessity when this area and the area to the west is
developed.
The people living in that neighborhood have obviously enjoyed the use of that
high wooded area for many years, and the Community Services staff does support .
their recommendation for City Council consideration of acquisition of this
parcel for public park purposes. Staff does question need for 35 acres and
staff would not support the recommendation that this park be accessible only
from walking trails, bike paths, cross country trails or walking type bridges
across the creek and marshland. If the City is to acquire that amount of
parkland for public use, the City should also insure all residents in the City
ZOl'1
•
-2-
adequate access by automobile. Preservation of this type of a resource
would constitute more than a neighborhood park and would be comparable
to Birch Island Community Park on County Road 4.
BL:md
wig
•
MEMO
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
SUBJECT: TIMBER CREEK DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
DATE: August 8, 1980
REFER TO: February 11, 1980 Planning Commission Minutes
March 24, 1980 Planning Commission Minutes
April 9, 1980 Staff Report
April 14, 1980 Planning Commission Minutes
June 6, 1980 Park 6 Recreation Minutes
June 12, 1980 Park & Recreation Staff Report
June 23, 1980 Park & Recreation Staff Report
July 7, 1980 Park & Recreation Minutes
1979 Comprehensive Guide Plan
.
BACKGROUND
On January 21, 1980, B.T. Land Company applied for Planned Unit Development Concept
approval. The original plan included six, eightplexes on the northwest portion of
the site, about seven acres of park north of Purgatory Creek, and no park south
of the creek.
This plan was presented at the February 11, 1980, Planning Commission meeting. .
There were many questions brought up and the item was continued to March 24 and sub-
sequently to April 14, to allow the proponent time for revision and to answer
questions.
Prior to the staff report and the April 14, 1980 Planning Commission meeting, the
developer substantially changed the plan to respond to recommendations.
The changes at that time included:
1. Elimination of the proposed commercial site at the intersection of Duck Lake
Trail and C.S.A.H. 4.
2. Elimination of the eightplexes north of Purgatory Creek.
3. Inclusion of a 6.8 acre park south of Purgatory Creek and enlargement of the
park north of the creek to 10.2 acres.
4. Introduction of an additional housing type rather than all of the multiple
south of the creek being quads.
5. Reduction of units from 306 to 258.
When the Planning Commission reviewed this revised plan with the Planning Staff
report of April 9, they voted 3-3 to recommend approval of the PUD to the City
Council.
The proponent has appeared before the Park and Recreationand Natural Resources
Commission, and revised the plan to meet with their approval. Since these revisions
includeuitemswhich the Planning Comnission had recommended, the proponent wishes
to present these changes to the Commission for their recommendation. The changes
2ui 9
Memo--Timber Creek
-2- August 8, 1980
which the Commission had requested and the developer has accomplished are as
follows:
1. In the southwestern area of the plan, the quad units have been pulled further
out of the woods for more preservation.
2. Area has been added as a pedestrian access to the northwestern corner of the
southern park.
3. The northern park has been 'squared off' as requested and .2 acre added.
4. The cul-de-sac leading to the northern park has been pulled southwest off of
the top of the knoll to more correctly fit the topography.
5. The multiple area south of the creek and adjacent to the western property line
has been modified to condominiums to consolidate the units and allow more open
space adjacent to future single family. These lots have been increased from
130 feet in depth to 210 feet. The proponent has committed to a detailed land-
scaping a berming plan at the time of rezoning for this site.
6. Open areas between lots have been provided to give access to Purgatory Creek.
7. Because of bad soil problems on Townline Road, one of the entrances to the
northern single family area has been moved west.
8. Trail easements along Duck Lake Trail and C.S.A.H. 4 will be provided.
R9, Becalse of the inclusion of the condominium hui dinns, the total units has
increased iron 253 to 258. (cross density 1.72, net density 1.95).
10. Road access has been added to connect the southern area with future develop-
ment to the west. i
The concept of this development is to provide a mix of housing types (single family
free standing -- single family clustered) integrated with ample passive (38 acres)
and active (18 acres) open space all at a density under 2 units per acre.
This is a concept that the Comprehensive Guide Plan.encourages. The Guide Plan
illustrates this area as low density (2 u/a) but specifically encourages mix of
housing type and the clustering concept in order to accomplish this.
The proponent has worked with the Commission and Staff in order to reach this
point. Very specific planning has been done to answer questions even though we
are at the Concept stage. The proponent will be returning to the Commission with
specific requests for buildings at the time of rezoning and platting.
• The plan as revised is consistent with Cbmission recommendations and the Compre-
hensive Guide Plan.
RECO'1MENDAT i ONS
'The Planning Staff recommends approval of the PUD Concept plan dated 6/13/80.
CE:ss
2020
•
MEMORANDUM
T0: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
i
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: June 23, 1980
SUBJECT: Timber Creek Development Proposal
On June 16, 1980, Jack Lynch of BRW Architects and Rick Murray of 8-T Land Co.
presented the Timber Creek Development Proposal 'to the Parks, Recreation and
Natural Resources Commission. The proposal for developing 150 acres west of
County Road 4, north of Duck Lake Trail includes 258 residential units. There •
are two neighborhood parks to be dedicated, a 10 acre park north of the creek
and a 71 acre park south of the creek. There is also 35 acres of open space
adjacent to the creek to be left in its natural state.
Staff.recommended approval of this plan pointing out the density of this proposed
PUD would be 1.72 including the park area and approximately 2 units per acre
excluding the park area. Staff pointed out that the park dedication of approximately
18 acres exceeded the 10°a mimimum established by ordinance, and that the parks are
located as proposed in the 1979 Comprehensive Park Plan that was approved by the
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and the City Countil in 1979.
At the June 16 meeting there were approximately 20 residents in the audience that
were concerned with the Timber Creek proposal. The majority of the concerns expressed
from residents was access to these parks, especially to the park north of the
creek. The other concern of the residents was that the high hill northwest of the
northern most part was being developed rather than preserved in open space.
The motion by the Commission was as follows: "Pond moved to recommend that the
Council reject this proposal because the residents already living in this area
should have more consideration than the people yet to come. R.Anderson seconded
the motion. Motion was approved 4-1 with all voting "aye" except Dave Anderson
voting "naye"."
On June 17 Rick Murrray called to ask what he should do now. We discussed the
general feeling of the residents that attended the meeting and the members of
the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. I indicated that I felt
the major two concerns were access to the northern most park and preserving the
knoll to the northwest. I suggested that he return to the Parks, Recreation and
Natural Resources Commission showing the trail easement from County Road 4 to
the northern most park and a trail easement across Purgatory Creek connecting the
two residential areas and giving both areas access to the creek valley. lie indicated
that he already exceeded the requirement for dedication of parks but would return
with this proposal if the City agreed to purchase the easements. I indicated that
I would recommend the City paying for trail easements if he proposed a reasonable
price.
There would be two ways to accomplish preservation of the knoll to the northwest
of the northern most park. The first way would be to eliminate the 8 acre park
south of the creek and reshape the northern most park to an 18 acre parcel. This
would eliminate 8 acres of active use area that would serve residents north of
Duck Lake and west of County Road 4 in exchange for a high knoll that offers
a good sliding hill and a beautiful view of the valley to residents north of the
2021
-2-
creek and west of County Road 4. Staff agrees with the residents that the high
knoll is a beautiful park site and certainly is appreciated by many residents.
However, the primary purpose of the neighborhood parks system is to provide
active use areas within walking distance of each residential area.
The Commission should be reminded that some of the information expressed by the
residents at the Juno 16 meeting was not totally accurate. One of the residents
indicated that there was no access from the Edenview area to this park, when in
fact there is public access from the cast from a cul-de-sac on Creekview Lane.
A copy of the half section map is attached to this memo showing 100' of public
frontage. It was also pointed out that residents in this area voted in 1968
to acquire this property for parkland and they have been waiting ever since for
thb City to acquire it. In fact, in 1968 the park bond referendLm was for
acquisition of lakeshore property and the City in turn acquired Birch Island Lake
Park, a nature park, directly across County Road 4 from the Edenview Development.
With the existing access off of Creekview Lane,and a proposed access from County
Road 4,and the access as proposed from the west through the cul-de-sac in the
proposed development, this northern most park would have access from three sides.
The southern park would also have access from three sides,directly off of Duck
Lake Trail to the south, also from the subdivision as proposed to the northeast,
and to future development in the northwest.
I believe Mr. Murray has proposed a satisfactory answer to the concerns of the
Commission in regards to access of both of these parks and the creek area. Although,
it is easier to agree with residents that are before the Commission, at this time,
the Commission has a responsibility of making decisions for development of parks
that will ultimately serve all of the residents in the community. If the S acres
on the south side of the creek is moved to the north side of the creek to acquire
the hill, it may be very difficult five years from now to face the hundreds of
residents that will eventually live between Duck Lake Road and Purgatory Creek
and tell them that there is no land left for development of an active use play area.
•
The Commission has faced many homeowner groups in the last couple of years that
have asked why the City did not plan ahead and acquire parks prior to having all
of the property developed. "Now our kids have to play ball in the cul-de-sacs" is
a familiar statement from neighborhoods that don't have active use areas planned
within a reasonable service area. This will certainly be the case if the City
does not take the opportunity to acquire this 8 acre neighborhood park adjacent to
Duck Lake Trail.
Staff recommends the Commission reconsider the Timber Creek Development Proposal
that now solves the concerns for access to these parks and recommends the Commission
approve the development as proposed.
BL:md
•
•
2a22
MEMORANDUM
TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: June 12, 1980
SUBJECT: Development Proposal Check List
PROJECT: Timber Creek
PROPONENT: B-T Land Co. •
REQUEST: PUD Concept Stage approval for IS0'acres for 253 residential units
LOCATION: West of County Road 4 and Eden View Subdivision, north of !hick Lake Estates
BACKGROUND: See Planning Staff Report Dated April 9, 1980
CHECKLIST:
1. Adjacent to parks? (Neighborhood, Community, Regional) Neighborhood Parks
Affect on park: This development would create "Eden Farms East" and "Eden Farms
West" neighborhood parks through park dedication.
2. Adjacent to public waters? Purgatory Creek divides the property.
Affect on waters:
3. Adjacent to trails? Bike/Pedestrian trails located adjacent to Co. Rd. 4 and
Duck Lake Trail. Possible future pedestrian trail adjacent to creek.
Type of trails: (bike, multi-use, transportation, etc.) bike and pedestrian
Construction: (asphalt, concrete, wood chips, aglime)asphalt along roads, woodchips
along creek, concrete sidewalks.
Width: R' asphalflarty Responsible for construction? developer for sideman,. City
Landosiership: (dedicated, density tradeoff, etc.) dedicated
Type of Development? (residential, commercial, industrial) residential 1
Where will CASH PARK FEE go? (what neighborhood) land dedication in lieu of cash
Need for a mini-park? No
1C/23
-2-
5. REFERENCE CHECK:
a. Major Center Arca Study: N/A
b. Neighborhood Facilities Study: 8y obtaining 12 acres north of the creek there is
potential for development of 2 softball fields, hockey, free skating, a sliding
Eirrand a limited number of tennis courts.
c. Purgatory Creek Study: It is important to set aside land in this sector for
•
neighborhood recreation as well as trail development. The 60 acre/mile
preservation concept would be appropriate in this area. The pond to the N.E.
• should also be preserved.
d. Shoreland Management Ordinance: See Planning Staff Report
e. Floodplain Ordinance: See Planning Staff Report
f. Guide Plan: See Planning Staff Report
g. Other:
6. Existing or pending assessments or taxes on proposed park property:
Shall be paid by the developer.
7. CASH PARK FEE? Land dedicated in lieu of cash fee.
8. Adjacent neighborhood type, and any neighborhood opinion voiced in favor or
against proposal: Neighborhood concerns voiced at Planning Commission retarding
housing type, (multiple) and park dedication.
9. Number of units in residential development? 253
Number of acres in the project? 150
Special recreation space requirements: None - The plat proposed to dedicate IR
acres of park and retain an additional 3S acres in open space atlllCent to the
creek.
10. STAFF RECO?PIICNDATIONS:_Spe Attached Silent
2021
•
•
MEMRORANDUM
TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Scrvices.
DATE: June 12, 1980
SUBJECT: Timber Creek Development Proposal
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
This development proposal has been before the Planning Commission on several occasions.
The Planning Commission finally had a 3-3 vote for approval on April 14, 1980. The
major concern seemed to be related to park issues.
Since that time the developer made several changes requested by staff including the
following:
1. Enlarging the east park site by reshaping lot line intrusions into the
recommended park space.
•
2. Enlarging the west park site by providing a wider access and an access
to the west.
( 3. Dedicating a public access to the floodplain from the northwest.
4. Relocating the townhouses in the S. E. area to preserve more of the trees.
The main park related issues of this proposal are the location and size of the
neighborhood parks, and the location of the line defining the conservancy area along
the creek.
Neighborhood Parks
There is at least 1 resident of the Eden View subdivision that is disappointed that
the 18 acres of dedicated neighborhood parkland is not located in one area - adjacent
to Eden View.
The Neighborhood Facilities Study shows two different alternatives to a neighborhood
park in this location - a 12 acre site and a 20+ acre site both alternatives are"one
site north of the creek adjacent to Eden View:'
In 1979 when the City updated the Guide Plan and adopted the Comprehensive Park Plan,
this concept for a neighborhood park in one location to serve both sides of the creek
was changed. The new concept showed a 7 acre park cast of the creek and a 6 acre park
west of the creek. Both park sites arc to be developed as active use parks with
ballficlds and tennis courts.
The staff, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and tho City Council
agreed that this approach provided more accessible parks for the majority of the
people in the service arca. If it is located on one side of the creek, obviously half
the people have to cross the creek to get to their neighborhood park.
202S
.2—
Conservancy Zone
The Purgatory Creek Study provides a map at 800 scale showing a proposed conservancy
zone in green tones. This is the area that should be preserved for protection
of the resources within the corridor.
In this sector, sixty acres/lineal creek mile was recommended for conservancy.
"In reality the limits of the conservancy arc flexible - adapting to specific •
site conditions, (landscape form and features)."
While the green area in the study indicates a general conservancy area in each
sector, each development proposal should be evaluated at a much larger scale in
order to delineate a conservancy area that serves the purpose intended - to protect
the resources within the corridor.
In the Timber Creek proposal, the floodplain alone preserves in excess of the recommended
60 acres/lineal mile recommended for the conservancy area.
Based on the topography, staff has drawn a proposed line for the conservancy area.
This line follows tree lines, ridge lines and in some cases merely is a line
connecting two knolls or a ridge line with a knoll. This conservancy lino is less
than the green area shown in the study, but exceeds the 60 acre/lineal mile also
recommended in the study. In fact, it approaches 80 acres/lineal mile.
It can be argued that there are some areas beyond this line that should be within
the conservancy area, however, 80 acres/lineal mile is getting to the point of being
unreasonable with the developer.
Community Services staff recommends approval of the plat as per the April 9, 1980
Planning Staff Report and with the changes shown by the developer at the June 16
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission meeting.
BL:md
i
A
2026
STAFF REPORT
•
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
PROJECT: Timber Creek
FEE OWNER: B-T Land Company
DEVELOPER: B-T Land Company
PROJECT REQUEST: Planned Unit Development Concept Stage
approval for 150 gross acres of property
for residential uses of 253 total units
made up of 76 townhome units, 40 townhuuse
units, 137 single family lots.
PROJECT LOCATION: Project is located on the northern border
of Eden Prairie just west of County Road 4
and the Eden View subdivision and is bisected
diagonally by Purgatory Creek,
DATE: April 9, 1980. •
BACKGROUND
The original request from the proponent was for a PUD Concept
approval on 150 acres for 136 single family lots, 120 quadraminium units,
48 eightplex units and a 2.3 acre Community Commercial site. After the
initial public hearing before the Planning Commission and subsequent meetings
with Planning and Community Services Staff members,the proponent has re-
vised the proposal to the scope listed under project request of this report.
The community commercial site has been eliminated, the eightplexes have
been eliminated and two neighborhood park areas totalling approximately 17
acres have been incorporated within the project. An addtional building
type has been added in the multiple section,on the property south of the
creek,in the form of approximately 40 units of townhomes which can be de-
signed in such a way as to acconnodate a drop-in grade across the site.
These units,when designed,should more properly respect the hill form.
The 1979 Guide Plan Update illustrates the area of this project as low
density residential not to exceed 2 units/acre. The area of flood plain
is designated in the Guide Plan as being an amenity to preserve from devel-
opment. The 1979 Guide Plan allows for preservation of significant natural
resources,such as flood plain through the use of a density transfer. In
this case,flood plain makes up about 38 acres of the total 150 acres.
The existing zoning on the site is Rural on the higher portions and Flood
Plain zoning on the flood plain area of the site.
In 1972 there was a submission for a PUD on this site combined with 35 acres
of additional land lying both east of County Road 4 and South of Duck Lake
Trail,cal led Eden Farms,by the Shelter Corporation, This PUD Development
had a gross density of 2.7 units/acre and was made up of townhouses and
cluster homes. That project was approved in 1973 and this approval was
rescinded in September of 1974. Currently the property south of Duck Lake
Trail that was part of the original PUD is owned by the Assembly of God
Church and has been rezoned for that purpose. The property of single
Timber Creek -2- April 9, 1980
family lots (approximately 13 acres east of County Road 4) is not included
at this time under the 8-T Land Company's ownership.
LAND USE AND DENSITY
The new plan proposes preservation of the entire flood plain area, provision
of a 6.8 acre park adjacent to the Trumpy Country Vista single family area
in the southwest portion of Timber Creek PUD, and a 10.2 acre park to he
dedicated north of Purgatory Creek and adjacent to the Eden View subdivision.
The remainder of the land area north of the flood plain not provided as park
is planned for large lot single family of 63 units on 34.5 residential acres
for a total of 1.83 units per acre. This is a net density only including
the area of lots. The area south of the Purgatory Creek flood plain contains
74 single family lots which include approximately 1.8 acres of flood plain
along the back of some of the lots. This total area,including the small
area of flood plain,would bring the density to 2.18 units/acre. If the
flood plain acreage along the back of the lots is subtracted the lot net
density would be 2.3 units/acre. The aqudrarninium area by itself is 76 units on
13.8 acres fora total of 5.5 units/acre. The townhouse area is a total of 7.38
acres for 40 units bringing the density to 5.4 units/acre net. The overall
gross density of the development including all residential, area,all park
area, and all flood plain area is 1.7 units/acre. 'Since the proponent con-
templates dedicating the two park areas to the City as fullfillment of his
10% land dedication requirement,these areas should be subtracted from the
total acreage when figuring density transfer credit. In a more complete dis-
cussion on the acceptability of these park areas to the Planning and Com-
munity Services Staff will occur later in the report. for the purposes
of density calculation (since some of the northern park is within the flood
plain area and it contains a small pond)15 total acres or 10% of the 150
total acreage will be used as a subtraction when figuring density. If 15
acres is subtracted from 150 acres,that would leave 135 acres available f
for the 2 unit/acre density. This would enable the developer,hypothetically,
to obtain 270 units on the property. At this point the develop is pro-
posing 253 and the staff feels that pending specific site plan review this
is generally within an acceptable range. The overall density minus the park
areas then'would be 1.9 units/acre.
The 1973 Shelter Eden Farms proposal had a gross density including all flood
plain and open space areas of 2.7 units/ acre for a total of 443 dwelling 1
units. )
i
PURGATORY CREEK STUDY y
The PurgatoryCreekStudy delineates a' Conservancy Zone basically paralleling 1.
the flood plain of Purgatory Creek ment to follow significant ridge lines. 4
This zone,as applies to this property is somewhat general and is shown on
material submitted by the proponent. The Planning and Conununity Services
Staff feel that the proposal is basically in conformance with the Conser-
vancy Zone. .
SHORCLAND MANAGEMENT ACT 1
1
The Shoreland Management Act as amended in first reading by the City Council
with recommendation from the Connnission,would classify Purgatory Creek as a
General development water and would require lots adjacent to the creek to be a 1
minimum of 13.500 sq. ft., have a nrininunn width at the building line of 90' i
and be set back a minium 100 from the creek bed as well as being 90' in width
2U27
Timber Creek -3- April 9, 1980
"minimum at the creek bed. The general layout of the lots shown in the
PUD appear to allow the possibility of conforming to these restrictions in
the preliminary and final plat to follow.
FLOOD PLAIN
The City's Flood Plain ordinance #276 requires a permit to fill within
any flood plain area. There will also be a permit required to work within
the flood plain area from the Department of Natural Resources as some of
the area is classified as public wetland. The work contemplated within
the flood plain area is limited to the construction of two storm water
ponds and a small ribbon of filling for lots on the northern side of Pur-
gatory Creek.
EXISTING SITE CHARACTER
The Proponent has provided a brochure and worked with the City on the com-
pletion of an E.A.W. These documents give a complete description of soil,
topography, vegetation, surface water, drainage, and wildlife, Detailed
soil types are listed within the development brochure and basically have
the following characteristics. The majority of the area north of the Pur-
gatory Creek flood plain is made up of slopes in excess of 15% and within
the Heyder Sandy Load Comples. The basic development restriction within
this area is due to the high cost of installing streets and utilities
brought about if the grade of the land is not respected. The development
as proposed plans a road system with the slope of the land rather than
against. Large lots with walkout home sites will make it Possible to
build with the land. Any area which is graded and left
un restored is subject to severe erosion and building on a slope and soil
type such as this must be done with extreme caution. The area of slope
directly south of Purgatory Creek,which is roughly half of that portion
of the site,is identical in soil characteristic and slope to the area north
of Purgatory Creek. The balance of the site occuring in the southern 1/3
of the development is flat and the main soil concern is the hazard of wet
basements if the site is not graded properly for drainage, Drain tile
should be used around all foundation areas.
The soil characteristics of the Timber Creek area are absolutely identical
to the soil charateristics of the existing Eden View subdivision. The
area'is steeply rolling and contains sandy erosive soil on the side slopes.
With care during construction and a proper road and development plan,these
areas can be developed very nicely.
AQUIFER RECHARGE
Although this area has been illustrated as a potential aquifer recharge area,
the only potential for this exists in the small, low lying areas of the site
and the flood plain area that consistantly ponds water, Aquifer recharge
is a process of water standing in a depressed area over a long period of time
and percolating down through the earth to recharge various aquifer levels.
The Jordon Aquifer in this area (which the City obtains its drinking water
from)is in excess of 400 ft, below the surface. The recharge area for the
Jordon Aquifer is located in the Anoka sand plains.The low land areas of
the site will be preserve and additional water deverted to them. Addi-
tion ponding areas will he created and therefore any acquifer recharge to
the ground water in the area will be enhanced not degraded.
2OM
Timber Creek -4- April 9, 1980
VEGETATION
The major vegetation in the northern portion of this site occurs on the high hill
proposed for the large lot single family development. As proposed,the devel-
opment will negotiate the grade at 7% and provide walkout lots. Grading of
the road bed will generally be limited to the road R.O.W. and additional
grading will be required as individual homes are built. However, because
of the large lot area on this hill,the amount of vegetation that will be
disturbed will be small in proportion to the amount preserved.
There is a significant area of hard wood deciduous vegetation made up of
oak and basewood occurinq south of Purgatory Creek on the site of the
old farmstead. This area will be altered significantly by the placement
of the quadraminiums within this arca. It would be enhanced and preserved
through the use of larger lots for the quadraminiums, fewer gaudraminiums,
and a careful matching of the grade proposed for construction to the
existing grade. Mathing grade would allow maximum preservation of trees
between structures.
There is an'existing farmstead adjacent to Duck Lake Trail without buildings
that is not proposed to be preserved.
ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
Although zones are not specifically addressed within the PUD Concept Stage,
all of the lots for single family lying north of Purgatory Creek appear to
have the potential to meet the requirements of the 13.5 catagory of Ordinance
135. The single family area south of Purgatory Creek will meet Shoreland
Management Ordinance requirements and requirements of 135 for those lots
abutting the Creek. However, there are a small number of lots on the south
side of the loop road which may fall short of the 13.5 requirement and this
waiver could be allowed under the PUO approval.
The townhouses and townhomes are all proposed on lots that would meet the
RM 6.5 or 6;500 se. ft. of lot area/unit, minimum of Oridance 135, No set-
back variances are requested at this time.
SITE PLAN
Grading
The plan itself is laid out basically very well to correlate specific land
uses with existing grades. The townhome or auadraminium portion of the .
PUD is planned on the large flat area of the site because these units
require flat sites and do not accommdate changes in grade. Townhouses or
row townhouses which can be designed as walkout units are planned for
the slope of the site. Single family homes also can be planned as walk-
outs built with the slope of the site. The most significant grading on the
site will take place south of Purgatory Creek in the single family portion
of the site in order to accommodate the road. No grading should occur as
a part of the PUD concept approval. Detailed grading plans accommodating
unit types and showing actual street grade and grading reguircd for utilities
should acompany proposals for rezoning and preliminary platting.
200
Timber Creek -5- April 9, 1980
TRANSPORTATION
Discussion on transportation can be broken into two sections: 1. the
area lying north of Purgatory Creek; 2. the area lying south of Purgatory
•
Creek taking access from Duck Lake Trail and County Road 4.
1. The 63 single family lots planned north of Purgatory Creek are contem-
plated as high value single family lots with a slow obsortion rate and
very slow current market. These lots would take access fromTownline Road
which currently is black topped to the project's eastern access point(or
the intersection of Woodland Drive and Scenic Heights Road). Town-
line Road east of this project is currently black topped to
County Road 4 and is 21 ft. wide with no curb or gutter. This road cur-
rently serves the Eden View First Addition traffic which is
made up of approximately 70 units. Approximately 12 of these units
front on Townline Road. April 1980 count on Townline Road indicate
that the peek hour use of Townline Road it approximately 133 trips.
This itidicates an average daily trip number on Townline Road
of around 1,300 trips. Although two to four cars were observed at
various periods during the peak hour waiting to turn on to County Road
4,there were no significant delays observed.
Total development of these 63 lots proposed by Timber Creek would be
expected to be at least 5 years from today. At that point the develop-
ment would contribute 630 average daily trips to the 1,3D0 currently on
Townline Road and approximately 63 peak hour trips to the 133 currently
experienced. Although this represents a 50% increase the Planning Staff
does not feel that this development represents a problem which will ulti-
mately have to be resolved on Townline Road. The basic problem will
come from development which may be anticipated in the future occurring
west of this project which will add to the traffic on Townline Road.
Townline Road west of Woodland Drive has a very poor profile and is a
gravel surface. The Planning Staff would recommend that the current
developer pave To mline Road to his western boundery at the time of
development of the northern parcel and that the City continue to work
with Minnetonka and Hennepin County to develop a program of construction
• for improvement of Townline Road.
The area proposed south of Purgatory Creek take approximately half of its
area access from County Road 4. This area could be expected to generate
approximately 740 average daily trips toward County Road 4 with a daily
peak of approximately 74 cars. There are approximately 7,500 trips per
• day currently existing on County Road 4. The County has done a sight
line study of the proposed access and does suggest that the developer
provide a deceleration and acceleration lane on the east side of County
Road 4. In addition the City Staff has suggested and obtained concerrt'nce
from the County that an additional safety feature should be provided by
the developer on the east side of County Road 4. This would be a bypass
lane identical in length and width to the improvement requested on the
west side of County Road 4. This bypass lane is necessary because of the
grade on County Road 4 which makes stopping in sl ippery weather difficult.
Sight distances arc adequate and within County standards at the proposed
access to County Road 4 with the improvements mentioned.
201
- I 1 z
o -
• . N
>
3
o
a
> II..
I.
a
a
I-- 3
W o
z . • •
a .
-J
. z
I 1 W.
N •
1 z .
}• O
03 cn
z •
CC o
•
D 41 .
o
L M
id . j .
y- L
a' O
CC I
Li • •
z
o re -Fr)). 1 . ( .
U o y
M
•
W
a.
z(32
Timber Creek -6- April 9, 1980 1
The access to Duck Lake Trail would generate approximately 1,360 average
daily trips or 136 peak hour trips to Duck Lake Trail. Duck Lake Trail
according to April 1980 counts)is carrying approximately 3,550 average
daily trips at the intersection of County Road 4 and Duck Lake Trail.
This is a peak hour of approximately 350 trips. Our traffic study in-
dicated a. many as 8 cars backed up on approach to County Road 4, how- a
ever, significant delays were not observed.
With the construction of Valley View Road to the south of Duck Lake Trail,
our traffic analysis indicates that a reduction of approximately 2,500
trips will occur on Duck Lake Trail. Taking into account landvacant being
development west of the Timber Creek project,approximately 1,130 new trips
could be expected in the future. This would bring the total on Duck Lake
Trail with Valley View Road in place to 2,233 trips. Timber Creek 9
would add approximately 760 average daily trips for a total of 3;120 trips
at Duck Lake Trail and County Road 4. This would be approximately 400
trips less at full development of Eden Prairie then exists today on Duck
Lake Trail and County Road 4.
The Planning and Engineering Staff suggested that the City plan to swing
a portion of Duck Lake Trail slightly to the south of its current inter-
section with County Road 4 inorder to bring it to a right angle. This 1
small tapering to the south would be accommodated on a small portion of
land of the Assembly of God Church. As a part of that development pro- I
posal the Assembly of God Church agreed to provide area for the realign-
ment of Duck Lake Trail. The center line Of the proposed alignment of
Duck Lake Trail would then be 300 feet south of the next anticipated center
line intersection (which would occur on the east side of County Road 4.)
It would also be approximately 1,100 feet south of the proposed Timber
Creek access to County Road 4. This new location of Duck Lake Trail (to
bring it to a 90° angle with County Road 4)is recommended by the City
Engineering Department and Hennepin County and will meet sight line
standard established by the County.
CIRCULATION
The Planning Staff feels this project isolates itself in terms oInanuded
an
overall road system from the properties occurring to the west,
is a figure which shows a suggestion for provision of a stub road to the
property's western property line to allow future connection with future
potential development to the west. The graphic illustrated shows a
hypothetical possible development pattern to the west. Placement of the
stub road and the location show would separate the single family area
in Timber Creek from the quadraminium area with a road.
LAND USE
The Planning Staff feels that the addition of the 6.8 acre park in the
southwestern area of the Timber Creek proposal is an improvement in that
it places a park directly adjacent to existing single family (toward the
west)rather than multiple development. However, there are 5 quadramrinium
lots still adjoining four 5 acre single family lots to the west.
Although vegetation occurs along the fence line, much of this is elm and
may he expected to die in the future. In addition, the area shown for
townhouses along the northeast facing slope is very narrow and seems to
require that the row townhouses be accessed directly from the City Street.
2053
,
' •• 7
7,...1 ':j.,,,I...',.:,,N',::N.....,...:., ,,N.N... . •••••i,,_12...1,..,,,./ ..0 • . .,.i \ ...,, .;
•
! 3::.',Chathal d. .; . additional - \-''/ ..:../:, {\, I i
l�open space II` -` \r/"open space ...\,s,W • \ , �.
;S - ,. \ possible :.( ,, _-1� \ n,
,\ /. -, .. , through s Ir�:�"'--I /`�.
• . street woo y' L. �� �_
.2...:7> ,1 .
1 • U gito } i 1
J,1 r •`'= U :I--'POO SIBCE' .. \-�1---�^�,\'` _;' r, �.. \_ / f�
•
•
,a.," »lW al., -- r r , r—. '`;+ J�` / t�, .�/ alp �`'- I ,,',`, I I. • /\ \\ .
;o•,oth,�; „l :i: •L,+possible \TI �• )O , `__- ,
r 2 .' .,a, ! 9 road connec � i�/; \j• '
::.
glr,,' „ oa,a --' 1_' Icy/�'-�l•. `�•' \r 1• . '' 1NNr .1,,. , �'"'ff 7 I h`--- • - \L� -• '� \ 1 , .J _ I.!` >t+ . .a. i FUTI}RE� f._ 'J.—CT;
k��\ �� • 1 `\��t i•
rr�iy�;�f
::-. 1:-' , ,.--' /,‘.
1 tr S '‘ I i
HO••r :147 .w.w l;0 U N 1 Y. F. sF,{ 1:>>. .. \,- i_
5 possible \ �:' /‹.Q 9 \/ .,\ t �`.•l., .,
y
ick .: ,. K. open space 4 n�. / � � ` Y - I
-! " , --- _ connection \''�,,,>••� ,.\.‹.. 1 \ •� 1
/ 1
• 1:'nutX....."$:Alit tr
TIMBER CREEK AND SURROUNDING AREAS
ZU3(1
Timber Creek -7- April 9, 1980
This a very poor situation and could be improved by the provision of a wider area
for townhouse development. The Planning Staff would recommend that the quadraminium
area adjacent to the western single family area be expanded in width
in order to allow space for a vegetation and gradting buffer and transi- 1
tion of land use. The area left for townhouses along the northeast
facing slope should expanded as well in order to provided for a private
road access to these units rather then direct access to public road.
The quadraminium lots within thewooded area should be expanded in size '
in order to allow more potential for preservation of vegetation between
units.
PARKS
The Community Services staff finds that the southern park area is accept-
able. The northern park area should be expanded by extending the western
north/south boundary of the park straight north to make the area totally
rectangular rather than allowing a triangularprotrusion of three lots
down into the park: In addition the Community Services Staff has made
recommendations requesting access outlots between some of the lots to
allow pedestrian movement down to the flood plain. There should also
be a pedestian connection from the southern park to the northwestern
property for future potential access at time of that property's develop-
ment.
Access to the northern park from the Edenview Addition is limited to
cul-de-sac called Creek View Lane. This access with onlyconveniently serve
only about 1/3 of the Edenview,NottinghamForest, and KutcherFirst Addi-
tion areas. The Planning Staff suggest that the Community Services
Staff work with residents in the Edenview First Addition area with lots
adjoining the property's western boundary in order to find some additional
acess to the park property.
The cash park fee would not be assessed but rather,land would be dedicated
as illustrated in the northern and southern park.
Pedestrian systems in the proposal should include access areas between
lots as required by the Community Services Staff which will be developed
further at the time of platting and individual rezoning. There should
also be a loop sidewalk system in the southern portion of the develop-
ment With a five foot wide concrete sidewalk along one side of the entire
• main loop through the area. in addition,right-of-way should be provided
along Duck Lake Trail and County Road 4 for construction of a future
City bike trail.
RECOMMENDATiON •
The Planning department would reconmiend to the Planning Commission approval
of the PUO concept illustrating 253 total residential units subject to
the following:
1. The total final number of units would he dependent upon revi-
sion of the PUD concept to provide wider townhouse lots along
the northeast facing slope area, wider quadraminium lots
adjacent to the property's western boundary, and larger quad-
raminium lots within the wooded area of the site. This approval
20?;
Timber Creek -8- April 9, 1980
would not be tied to a firm 253 units but would be based upon
the basic concept presented as modified by specific site plans
provided at the time of preliminary plat and rezoning.
2. That no grading or development of the property take place
as a result of the PUD concept approval. Grading or land
alteration would be permitted only in those phases specifically
proposed for rezoning and preliminary platting with a definite
development plan.
3. The basic concept of density transfer from the flood plain
area of the site should be allowed.
4. Access to the western residential property should be provided
as outlined in this report.
5. Additional park area should be dedicated in the northern
park as outlined in this report.
6. At the time of development of the northern single family lot
area, Townline Raod would be required to be improved (if not
done prior to that time) by the developer, to his western
boundary.
7. Road improvements as required by the City and County outlined
in this report for the access to County Road 4 would be the •
responsibility of the developer at time of development of the
northern leg of the loop road.
8. Fifteen feet of R.D.W., anda flat n grading accuruirici to City specifi-
cations be provided along Duck Lake Trail and County Road 4 for
construction of bike trails by the City in the future.
9. Credit on lot sizes for lots sho'rinq portion in the flood plain
will be given, however, actual lots should be platted out of
the flood plain area. Restrictive covenants prohibiting con-
struction or altering of vegetation in the Conservancy Zone
• must be filed.
10. Preliminary plats and rezoning applications shall he consistent
with the Shoreland Management Ordinance.
11. The basic configuration of the lots adjacent to the Creek is
consistent with the Conservancy Zone.
12. Park areas designated on the proposal shall be dedicated at
the time of any final platting of any portion of the property.
13. Detailed pedestrian systems must be submitted by the proponent
as a part of the i'UD,Development Stage approval to follow.
This would include but not be limited to additional access
points to the Purgatory Creek flood plain area and a 5' wide
concrete sidewalk along one side of the loop road through
the southern area.
14. In addition to 'enlarging the quadraminium lots along the
property's western boundary,a detailed plan should be sub-
mitted at the time of preliminary platting of this area
L03
Timber Creek -9- April 9, 1980
which illustrates a buffering provided by the proponent
made up of vegetation and grading to provide a transition
between the mutiple area and the single family area lying
to the west.
CE:jo
•
•
•
20 37
eilare.h, 1 q"
( TIMBER CREEK SITE
AREA ANALYSIS
TUTAL SITE AREA . . . . . 150 Acres
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS . . . 253 Units
Gross Densit3(253u/150ac) . . . . 1.69 Units/Acre
Net Density Minus Floodplain . . . 2.18 Units/Acre
(253u/116ac)
Net Density Minus Parks . . . . 1.90 Units/Acre
(253u/133ac)
Net Density Minus Parks & Floodplain . 2.56 Units/Acre
Single Family Site Seth of Creek
Gross Donsity(63u/34.Sac) . . 1.83 Units/Acre
Net Density (same) . . 1.83 Units/Acre
Single Family Site North of Creek
•
Gross Density(74u/34ac) . . 2.18 Units/Acre
Net Density(74u/32.2(-fp)) 2.30 Units/Acre
Townhouse Site(West)
Gross & Net Density (76n/13.8ac) 5.50 Units/Acre
Townhouse Site (East)
Gross & Net Density (40u/7.38ac) 5.40 Units/Acre
(total park area 17 acres)
(total floodplain area 34 acres)
1
3-28-80
7:10- •
8:10AM
TOTAL MOVEMENTS AT TOWNLINE ROAD(W. 62ND ST)
COUNTS
Trips turning North on #4 99
97 cars + 2 buses
Trips turning South on #4 2P
Trips entering Townline from North 10
8 cars + 2 buses
Trips entering Townline from South 3
154 TOTAL
MINNETONKA
ti
c.
TOb;NLINE ROAD S
U
J
EDEN PRAIRIE - /1
.t
ep
( A
North
2U�9
3-27-80 TRIPS ENTERING TOWNLINE ROAD
4:30-
5:30PM
{
COUNTS
FROM COUNTY ROAD #4 91
(30% from South & 69% from North)
(35% of total turned onto Boulder Creek)
•
TRIPS LEAVING ON TOWNLINE ROAD 42
(60% turned South on #4 & 40% North)
133 TOTAL
•
•
•
bI
z /
z 1 O
I- MINNETONKA
/
/
I{ ` s0
(91) < ` I) •4
6.1 TOWNLINE ROAD -- �171,••
EOEN PRAIRIE /I /
North 1
20g0
3-27-80
7:10-
8:10AM •
TOTAL MOVEMENTS AT DUCK LAKE TRAIL
Trips turning North on Co.Rd.4 136
Trips turning South on Co.Rd.4 151
Trips entering Duck Lake Trail
from the North 19
Trips entering Duck Lake Trail
from the South 50
356 TOTAL
{
o
l
LAKE T�"�- 1 0
<----(69) f-- f..J
1 .ra
t
A •
( North
.200
.;k .
i
0
t
I
{ •
1
•
TRAFFIC COUNTS .
NORTHWESTERN EDEN PRAIRIE •
DATE LOCATION TOTAL NUMBER OF TRIPS
May 2, 1975 Duck Lake Trail 1,648
(West of 04)
Sept.,25&26, Duck Lake Trail 3,633(25) 1
1979 (West of 04) 3,535(26)
Sept., 24&25, Duck Lake Trail 1,192(24)
1979 (East of TH 101) 1,212(25)
•
'79
3,550
y ,
Lake Trail_
'79 Dock 15
1,202 1,648
m
0
.-. Cr
x
i-
•
North
2Uu2
.
1 / Z, ; 1 / r - i1
V ..)\\.,,,,.. - \\,,7) .,;:-7•,-- .. . 1
tr'\ . • ' \ ....7.>„,:\
•
y ♦ •. • ,,\.
..- \ • 414. . .. (. '.4.
A , - - .
. :, 0 _ • "
::._.___, , r \ ---v=1 '--N \ • . ','`,
\g 0 i
, , \. • >2 s \-, .' ..1. ;* ' \' ;\ ' \•• •- • ---.\: —--.::::1
1."'" .. \ : . • /7 • I
K _____ _.........
.:•• _- : •i,..i., `..f---:._ - ,-. .- -- -
--.---:,.. . .. 10
-. .i ... . . :‘.4:17\\; \42?-,,, - , . ,
7'' ; .
�� �` 1 • 0
•
Possible future platting &
access , \
-- -----
•
•
/ • A
North
•
. i 20g3
•
•
i......-•.,..,.-.•1__..-•
- . ._ .,,. •
` •
1 . �.. a _.
I' ..H- .�7 . . -•
t.. . 1 L.____.__
I • ta I ! k . . :t
.... L ....„1. ____.•__i ._____..
1 .
....._•_•.1 .
_ ..
..
1IH ±- H .,...
1 •
1' I 1 . . . _ _ -._. 1
' ...
l i... I__..._1.._._ .1___._..� '� __
1 --r' 1 . �% . n •
i ( I i \ \
' ' •I ..I i `, `.. ,.
I
2 qq
•
•
Q 0
Q.
a
iii F
ido ..
Q ' T
U) — I
a
cn
m 6
z •
Co u _ •
0 f
1 (lc a .
H z M
s .i .
( . -,-.
p to -..-
C.) o _
M
t
1
t
W
Q
•
2cq
•
ii
"0' 't:..;',; ... '; ''...a''''''''..'N.;:\ PIT IK 'k 1...)1 \--\ 1 ,'\. ' • j, ` 'sy' I--, %;\1 am -: /
- -i Chatham Ud. '''' \� yJ _ L (i
•.( , , additional \ ‘/- <,
,'-;'/'7?.;A'.::\
ce open space , - \,rapen space (' -`i -` / X ";\'^
;� .�• ,r� r •,.I -� possible ./ _ ;^%-' .1
y v. • ...�,;r street ur_,-�•.... '\ / ;fp ,
.~_ {a. « + -. 4 �� i�.q "'�� ✓1 j Olio 0 //� - -" i - j
•
/:):1:-.-t.,•-• 1- i _..-- ,•., . , 1
v. „ :-.,.T.
w aT ( ��SL
PIBE,_ v `.✓
LC' • . L C ( (' I
.(.,, „ :r ossible ' o ' t
'2 • �W, I 9 road connec•� /;
•,.,. \
" ��r 11 possible r \ ;.c �'�yjA � / ,\ ,,t.,;t <%.'., r.
! : \ .
—i ,` St` .- _ open space ��.0 , ,, \ =�
t I „_ �f` T connection `
s L
It v(srn � y f r
•
.''..11U:K....-.S AK[ )).1 •• .
•
TIMBER CREEK ANO SURROUNDING AREAS
2O I(,
•
PROMY MEMORANDUM
PIANNit1G,iRAN$PORigi10N1[NGINF.ERINOIARC NiiECiURE
July 22, 1980
rt
}
TO: Chris Enger
FROM: Jack Lynch
RE: TIMBER CREEK - B.T. LAND COMPANY
As you know our project has been recently approved by the Parks d Recreation
Commission as to our request for concept approval. I understand that we will
now be going back to the Planning Commission to enable them to review our
revised plan and hopefully resolve the tie vote.
The revised Concept Plan has attempted to address both the concerns of the
Planning Commission and the Parks d Recreation Commission:
• Housing units in the southwest corner of the site have been pulled away from
the western property line, buildings have been pulled out of the existing
woods such that the woods will remain basically untouched and townhouse lots
have been enlarged and a private access has been provided to reduce
individual driveways onto a public street.
• Access to the undeveloped land to the west has been provided.
• The northern park has been enlarged and reconfigured as requested.
• A bike easement and grading will be provided along County Road 4 and Duck
Lake Trail.
• Single Family lots have been enlarged along the flood plain to comply with
the Shoreline Management Ordinance.
• Additional pedestrian access to the flood plain and the southern park have
been provided. In addition, two trail easements will be provided within the
flood plain.
• In addition to providing an increased buffer along the western property line
earth berms and landscaping wiil be provided.
SATHER'ANGROS(WOL STEW JARVIS GARDNER INC 2879 UNIVERS.IY AVE SE MINNEAPOLIS MN55i14 PHONE 6171319 ln19
160
It should be noted that we have made every possible attempt to address and
accommodate the concerns and desires of your staff and Parks & Recreation &
Planning Commissions. Again, it should be stressed that we are asking for
Concept Approval. We still have two more approval processes to go thru with the
City to ultimately begin development.
The Timber Creek concept plan proposes a for-sale housing development of a
variety of housing types with an overall site density of 1.7 units/acre. in
addition 18 acres will be dedicated to the City for park purposes and another,
approximately 35 acres set aside in permanent open space.
JL/ks
?0q7
1I
•
` L.L.
PLANNING1IRA4SPDRTAIION IE NGINEERING/ARCHI TEC1URE
February 22, 1980
•
Mr. Chris Enger
Director of Planning
City of Eden Prairie
•
Eden Prairie City Hall
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344
Dear Mr. Enger:
The purpose of this letter is to bring
you up to date with the current
status of the B-T Land proposal, located in the vicinity of County Road 4
and Duck Lake Trail. I am formally requesting a continuation of the
Public Hearing until the second meeting in March.
(. Since our last meeting with you in City Hall, we have begun to explore
some alternatives, as well as attempt to interpret and nail down some
of the policy objectives, as well as ordinance requirements.
I would expect that we will have to have one ,;;re rct-;i,g tc clarify a
few questions that we continue tc ::.a:e, during the reek of February 25th.
In any event, a resubmittal will o;cur at least two weels prior to the
Planning Co-rission's meeting of arc 2;th.
With warm regards,
r- BATHgR-RINGROStl WOLSFELD-JARVIS-GARDNER, INC.
.17 C.
'Peter E ,
�Jarvis,�AICy PP
Principal\�
PEJ:aw
R RINGROSE WINS'f I. JANVIS C.ARDNER.INC ?BM UNIVL RS17V AVE SE WNNEAROIIS 4N".'A .,
2049 -
LAW OFFICE
BARNETT,RATELLE,III:NNESST,VANDER VORT,STASEL & HERZOO
A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
ROBERT W.6ARNCTT 462A IDS CENTER PHILIP J HALEEN
HERMAN J.RATCLLE MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55402 THOMAB R.GALT
JAMES H.HENNESSY PHILIP A.PFAFFLY
WAYNE A.VANDER VORT AREA CODE 612.330-8791 EDWARD J•BLOMME
STANLCY R.STASEL CHIC W.FORSttRO
W.SCOTT HERZOO - DALE M.WAONER
WILLIAM A.HAUO DAVID&RAND
FRANA J.WARNER
(1014-1076)
February 21, 1980
Eden Prairie Planning Commission
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
RE: Proposed Timber Creek PUD
Gentlemen:
Please be advised that I own approximately 11 acres of unde-
veloped property on the east side of County Road 4 and immediately
across from the above-proposed project.
I would like to go on record, since I was out of town on February
llth and will be out of town on February 25th, opposing the
proposed development. I am opposed to any commercial, townhouse
and quad development in this location. I am further opposed to
the proposed density.
I respectfully request that you accept this letter as my opposi-
tion to the development and further as my specific request to
receive a copy of the staff report and any other applicable and
available information to be sent to me at the above-captioned
address.
Yours very truly,
00.14, 4. tIamcleitV6.x.1"
Wayne A. Vander Vort
WAV/nf
C
20SU
il
Riley- Purgatory Creek Watershed District 1
8950 COUNTY ROAD 44
`,, """"' EDEN PRAIRIE.MINNESOTA 55343
1
February 13, 1980 s
P
Mr. Chris Enger
City Planner 1
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Re: Timber Creek Development: Eden Prairie
Dear Mr. Enger:
The engineering advisors to the Board of Managers of the Riley-Purgatory
Creek Watershed District has reviewed the preliminary plans as submitted to
the District for the Timber Creek Development in Eden Prairie. The following
policies and criteria of the Watershed District are applicable to this
proposed development.
1. The District notes that an encroachment into the 100-year floodplain
of Purgatory Creek may be proposed as part of the overall grading
plan for the project. Therefore, a detailed grading plan showing I
both existing and proposed contours must be submitted to the ti
District for review and approval. If an encroachment is proposed i
into the 100-year floodplain of Purgatory Creek, the proposed E
encroachment must meet the encroachment criteria set forth by
Watershed District policy.
2. The District suggests that the developer be in contact with the 4
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for determinations of
any and all public waters that may lie within the boundaries of
the development site. Should the MDNR determine that public waters
are within the site and grading operations are proposed below the
natural ordinary highwater elevation of the public waters, an
MDNR Chapter 105 Work in Public Waters Permit will be required.
In areas where development remains above the natural ordinary high-
water elevation, a Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District grading
and land alteration permit will be required.
Accompany this permit application, a detailed erosion control plan
outlining how sediment will be prevented from leaving the altered
areas on the development site both during and after construction
must be submitted to the District for review and approval.
2.G61
•
Mr. Chris Enger
Page 2
February 13, 1980
3. Due to the size of the development, the District will require that
grading operations be phased. •
4. A detailed storm sewer plan must be submitted to the District for
review and approval. This plan should include the locations and
design of all storm sewers and sedimentation basins to be located
on the site.
5. The District notes that the proposed development encroaches into
the conservancy area as indicated in the Purgatory Creek Trail Study.
Prior to final City and District approval, this conflict must be
resolved.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this development at an early
date. If you have any questions regarding the District's comments, please
contact us at 920-0655.
Sincerely,Ca
\-
Bo ert C. ObermeyA
BARR ENGINEERING _
Engineers for the District
( RCO/111
cc: Mr. Conrad Fiskness
Ms. Desyl Peterson
Mr. Don Ringrose
•
201 r
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "
320 Washington Av. South =f � '
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 `` `• I
HENNEPIN_FL "•M1
935-3381
t
February 7, 1980
. s
1
Mr. Chris Enger
Planning Director
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Mr. Enger:
RE Proposed Plat - "Timber Creek PUD" (ig
CSAH 4 & future CSAH 62 (Townline Road)
Section 5, Township 116, Range 22
Hennepin County Plat No 806
Review and Recommendations
Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review
of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and found
it acceptable with consideration of these conditions:
- Along CSAH 4 the cevelot:er should dedicate an additional 10 ft. of
way making the right of way 50 ft. from the center of CSAH 4.
- No additional right of way is required by Hennepin County in the area of
plat for upgrading future CSAH 62 (Townline Road).
- To avoid conflicts with the existing right turn lane from CSAH 4 on
Lake Trail all access to the proposed cor,mercial site must be via Dic;.
Trail. Access point 1 (attachment 1) must be eliminated.
- The developer must provide a combined right turn and by-pass lane (A:“: . .t :)
at access point 2 (attachment 1) on CSAH 4.
- The developer must realign access point 3 (attachment 1) on to CSAH 62 (T,•::Mire
Road) directly opposite existing Woodland Road.
- To allow using existing CSAH 62 (Townline Road) as a frontage road after con-
structing new CSAN 62 and to limit access on to CSAH 62 the developer must
provide access to the proposed 8-plexes via access point 4 (attachment 1)
at the proposed access point 4 location. Access point 5 (attachment 1) must
be eliminated.
HENNEPIN COUNTY
on equal opportunity employer
2053
>.
Cr ceh CUD"
page 2
- Any new access on to a county road or revision of existing access requires
an approved Hennepin County entrance permit. See our Traffic Division for
entrance permit forms.
- I'm sending the latest plan sheet from Layout 4 in the area of the plat to
'the City of Eden Prairie for review. This layout uses the existing right of
way north of present Townline Road and utilizes existing Townline Road as a
frontage road. For additional alignment information see our Preliminary
Design Engineer, Dave Schmidt.
-- - All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility
permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to,
drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. See
our Maintenance Division for utility permit forms.
- The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within
County right of way.
Please direct any response or questions to Les Weigelt. •
;;)
Sincerely,
%James M. Wold, P.E.
Chief, Planning & Programming
JMW/L DW:de
Attachment
cc BT Land Company, 1055 East Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata, Mn 55391
•
200
1 I 1
.014*co • 1
...c.i•.14
i
i . .
. 4
- • I gil \ I
0
i. 0 1 . •
0 - . • , r ,,
?'
'
i -1' s ,. ,-../ Y' . ' g ..\ •
',... -
1 r)
, .
-, .-,•-•-•,:,...„.<, 1 , \ ,,,. 2..._
E:PTi! , / / ,, -----,....1 • \
\ .
- \ • - .'
-.---
\
1
PPPPP ----\- s.',..--t- ' — 1 ' ' / r, • 7-
t .
.. 1 - •-•.,_ -' N.:',1--,$ " ,...—._3____, \ , ,• .
\ ,
.7....iiS
:ig5 --..... .. • • ..
, \,
•._
t .....• _ ...., , ,.....
..• .
• ...--.. • - '`,.7-- L: ---' ' . . ,:\ ..Aj •
\ ,. ......,,L_. ..., .
.,:c:1
\j
) . ,.., ' -----.,.._-.7 •
.. \ .
\• N, Is ;
'
-
I .-.`,. ' - • .' :T. ii .
•
•
*•:..•'' -6'(-0 - i , , _
' \ ,/ --•', i____,- 1 .
:. •`r--.—...,„. ,' //', I
s i ml .\---Ar•1/4,' t/z• N. / • •4-,-.,,• \ l':' \
...___...
• r CO . ..:: , • (._.: .ii„..1•, E
—..._ P'"rt. '- ' —;).- -,4. -- • ,
- X•4.:vo ___ '
1 i
la
20 611
..7"......:,...,:s7A,'1W7,...."St1,1,147‘1•••V.,,voor•••••••••••••••••.r........... .---_
.... .
. . .. _
I
.
i -
. I .
• ...,
tit
I .::.
• -t . .
. I I 7-••• •
V
cil .
. 7.1 .
I • • • . , '
. (.1
. 0
:17
...7......... _____j
0 0
:P.'
.....
CD
____
-- --- -.••• •,..._ ----__ .Z.
ili ..
CD
M :0
•
..."- —__
) 0 C)
0 ..r.
:,.. ....-
( • ...
t....." --1 ..
• 1 . r
ryl
:e. --'1
0 . .
I
III C
C7 ::-U
0 ..--r-.7.
:z.
ri )Q
•
(r) (1
. .
.., ,
. ........ .,.)
x I I
• i •
..„?
1-
67 .. .
; h
o
,t,..! . • :,;,.
- _
Ill
L, I ( • . -
. -
C,
0
-
<
i •
CO
(-5 2056, •
., .
. _. . .
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 80-159
A RESOLUTION FINDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
WORKSHEET FOR TIMBER CREEK A PRIV4TE ACTION DOES
NOT REQUIRE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
WHEREAS, the City Council of Eden Prairie did hold a hearing on
August 19, 1980 to consider the Timber Creek proposal, and
WHEREAS, said development is located on approximately 150 acres
of sand in northwestern Eden Prairie, and
WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Planning Commission did hold a public
hearing on the Timber Creek PUD request and did recommend approval
of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet finding of no significant
impact,
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Eden Prairie City Council
that an Environmental Impact Statement is not necessary for Timber
Creek because the project is not a major action which does not have
significant environmental effects and is not more than of localsignificance.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a Negative Declaration Notice shall
be officially filed with the Minnesota Environmental Quality Council.
ADOPTED, this _day of , 1980,
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL
20s7
Minutes-Parks, Recreation & unapproved
Natural Resources Commission -3- August 4, 1980
Members absent: Richard Anderson •
b. Thorn Creek
John Uban was present representing the Minneapolis Retail Meat
Cutters and Food Handlers Health and Welfare Fund as developers
of this 601• acre project. Uban explained that an institution
such as the Meat Cutters Pension Fund is interested in long term
results, therefore can take their time in producing a quality
project with good design criteria.
Uban located the project cast and adjacent to Valley View Road,
and south of Ilichaelangelo Gardens. The property is wooded and
rolling and the structures have been designed to mold with the
terrain (i.e. terracing the structures). Uban said the structures
planned include a major sport facility (raquetball/tennis, soft
surface running trail), office complexes including a parking
ramp, and combination office/condominium structures.
Uban said cash will be paid in lieu of park dedication as
reoommended by the Eden Prairie Planning Commission. Ile added
that the developer does not plan to put a road through the flood-
plain due to sanitary sewer lines, etc. At this point Uban
invited questions and comments from the Commission and Staff.
Lambert said he communicated with the City of Edina regarding a
trail connection east from the Endblom property and they said
( nothing would be considered. In lieu of this, Lambert asked
the Commission to consider just a trail easement, as a trail may
not be feasible due to connections and terrain.
Tangen asked if there is a trail easement north through
Ilichaelangelo Gardens, and if so could it be a possible connection.
Lambert said yes, there is an easement north. Tangen said he
feels there is merit to a trail system in this area, and that a
provision should be made through the Nine Nile Creek corridor
which would connect into the Valley View Road system. He further
said this cite does not lend itself to park land dedication but
it does to trail easoment and wetland dedication.
Tangen asked if the height of the hill near the Endblom property
will be altered. Uban said minimally, approximately-15 feet, and
the structures will bo below the tree line in height at that point.
MOTION: VanMetor moved to recommend approval of the Thorn
.Creek development and request a trail easement where it is
best suited and also that the City maintain a cash park fee.
Froiderichs seconded the motion and it carried unanimously.
DISCUSSION: Tangen commended the developer on planning a
parking ramp rather than flat parking lots.
2058
!
approved
Planning Commission Minutes -4- July 14, 1980
MEMBERS ABSENT: Matthew Levitt
• D. THORN CREEK PLACE PUD, by Minneapolis Retail Meat Cutters & Food
Handlers Health & Welfare Fund, Request for PUD Concept approval for
office, commercial and multiple residential uses on 60 acres. Located
North & West of Co. Rd. 39 & East of U.S. 169-212. A public hearing.
John Uban, Howard Dahlgren & Assoc., reviewed site location, utilities, oroposed
i,... - _. •;per;ill ,multiple residential uses, note C9:1' . r Stl::\'. ,L' elation. etc.
i:c c_:.Led the first stage is expected to be a 4 storyand raquet club. he
the r:tlined the road systems and stated they would he working with City and
County tc resolve access feints.
The Planner reviewed the staff report recomc,endiing aproval.
Bentley asked if the Planner recommended more hcusinq units than depicted. The p'an-
mar replied affirmative.
•
expressed concern that additional housing will ccnerate fore imrar.t
the envirolm.ent.
Frank Smetana, 7680 Smetana Lane, was concerned with the improvements to Palley
View Road. Uban replied that R.O.W. will be enlarged en extra 17' and a ri.ht
and left turn lane and bypass lane will be added.
Smetana inquired about the oak trees in the South tip stating they arc a
barrier. Uban replied that they want to Lxeo them but, some may have to go for
the Valley View Road construction.
Gary Kostecka, 10805 Valley View Road, does not want to give up any land for
View and he does not feel that Valley View Road can handle the traffic flow.
Paul Enblom, 10610 Valley View Road, owner of the land to the East, stated he sold
B acres for the project and is satisfied with the concept.
Dan Enblom expressed concern about the parking lot in the woods located at the :,,:h
end of the project.
Uban stated that schematically they show required parking spaces, but given a .. ,•i-
ance for fewer, more trees could he retained.
Motion I
Retterath moved to close the public hearing on the Thorn Creek PUD. Gartner sec-
onded, motion carried 6-0.
Notion 2
Retterath moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the PUD as per the
Staff report of July 3, 1980 with the exclusion of #5. Gartner se(oudod, motion
carried 6-0.
2069
MEMORANDUM
TO: Parks, Recrcation.and Natural Resources Commission
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: July 31, 1980
SUBJECT: Development Proposal Check List
PROJECT: Thorn Creek
•
PROPONENT: Minneapolis Retail Meat Cutters and Food Handlers.Health and Welfare Fund
REQUEST: PUD Concept approval for residential, office and commercial uses on 60 plus
acres of,land.
LOCATION: East and adjacent to 169/212, northwest and adjacent to Valley View Road and
south of Hichaclangelo Gardens.
BACKGROUND: Sec Planning Staff Report dated July 3, 1980
CHECKLIST:
1. Adjacent to parks? (Neighborhood, Community, Regional) no _
Affect on park: N/A •
2. Adjacent to public ti;atcrs? Nine-Mile Creek borders the northeastern most
boundary line.
Affect o waters: This development will provide some increase in volume
o water rt:ncrrf-to—the Greet. -
3. Adjacent to trails? Proposed trail adjacent to Valley View Road, north side._
Type of trails: (bike, multi-use, transportation, etc.)Bike
Constriction: (asphalt, concrete, wood chips, aglimc)__ Asphalt
Width: 81 Party Responsible for construction? City
Landownership: (dedicated, density tradeoff, etc.).__ Right-of-Way
Type of Development? (residential, commercial, industrial)Residential, Office f,
Commercial
Where will CASH PARK PEE go? (what neighborhood) Construction of trail+ysttins
Need for n mini-park? none
•
2060
•
•
-2-
k
5. REFERENCE CHECK:
a. Major Ccntcr Arca Study: The MCA designated this area as highway/commercial/
regional service and regional office with some housing located along •
l Nine-Mile Creek.
b. Neighborhood Facilities Study: N/A
• .
c. Purgatory Creek Study: N/A
•
d. Shoreland Management Ordinance: This ordinance applies within 300' of Nine-
a
Mile Creek and this proposal does meet the ordinance.
p This ordinance applies within the floodplain of
e. Flood lain Ordinance:
Nine-Mile Creek and this development does meet the ordinance. .
f. Guide Plan: The 1979 Guide Plan shows this area as high density residential.
•
g. Other: • --
6. Existing or pending assessments or taxes on proposed park property: N/A.__- _
7. CASH PARK FEE?Th0 fee applicable at the time of building permit shall be paid
8. Adjacent neighborhood type, and any neighborhood opinion voiced in favor or
against proposal: ——
9. Nur.bcr of units in residential development? N/A -.—
Number of acres in the project? GO plus or minus
none
Special recreation space requirements: --- —
10. STAFI' RiiC0'NENOAT1ONS: Community Services stffccoimaeud _.approval-. -
( as per the Planning Staff Report of July 3, JPSO. — --•- -
20(.0I
r
i
.
STAFF REPORT i
TO: Planning Commission i
FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning ?
DATE: July 3, 19801
APPLICANT Minneapolis Retail Meat Cutters & Food 1
& FEEE OWNER: Handlers Health and Welfare Fund.
REQUEST: Planned Unit Development Concept Approval i
for Residential, Office and Commercial Uses i
on 60 + acres of land.
r
PROJECT LOCATION: East and adjacent to 169/212, northwest and a
adjacent to Valley View Road, and south of
Michaelangelo Garden $
BACKGROUND
Major Center Area designation: Housing/Highway Commercial/Regional Service/ 3
I
Regional Office. _
1979 Guide Plan designation: High density Residential
,
• Existing Zoning: C-Reg, not appropriate for intended use.
Post Proposals: In March of 1979 a smaller area (46.3 acres) was proposed
for commercial and office uses. This proposal was recom-
mended for denial by the Planning Commission and withdrawn
by the proponent prior to review by the City Council.
MOTION: Torjesen moved to recommend denial to the City
Council of the Schoenfelder P.U.D. Concept as per staff
report of May 7, 1979, Dept. of Trans. letter of 5/9, &
following reasons: 1.) Guide Plan update does propose
residential use in this area and there is no binding com-
mitment in this plan for residential. 2.) Unanswered
questions on the amount of trees that would be cut, hills
cut, and fill of flood plain. 3.) Lack of traffic infor-
mation. 4.) Uncertainity of road system. Retterath
seconded, motion carried 6-0-1, Bear1an abstaining.
CURRENT PROPOSAL
Additional area has been added to the current proposal, and the total nunOcr
of lots reduced. The net result is a far more open plan (11% F.A.R.) with
much more opportunity for creative building siting.
The request for grading of the entire site has been withdrawn. The proposal
is to only grade in phases as rezonings are requested.
The 110,000 sq. ft. Office/Racquet Club, will be the first request for re-
zoning. The building is designed with an adjoining parking ramp to maximize
the elevation change in the site and minimize the ground coverage.
2O4.0z
Staff Report -2- July 3, 1980
LAND USE
The Restaurant on the southern tip of the site preserves a major portion
of the small hill and trees.
Since the Guide Plan designates this area as high density residential, the
ability to actually building the combination office and residential structures
proposed is critical to the P.U.D.
ROAD ACCESS
Soils information has been included in the development brochure which indi-
cates great difficulty in crossing Nine-Mile Creek over the sanitary sewer,
when the sewer is on bad soils. The enclosed grapnic suggests a possioie
alternate crossing on better soils.
An additional road access easterly to Valley View Road has been added.
Hennepin County has reviewed both access points and made suggestions to
improve them which the proponent has agreed to.
An addition 17' of R.O.W. is required on Valley View Road.
PEDESTRIAN SYSTEM
No overall pedestrian system is shown.
• 2065
i‘.-- cirqi ) \ii\i• .. •,, i ,,t l 1 ,, .,..
\ , ( :fir...\-,.—,--. F. F_-,,,—..-.1. 1-1
.
\ \,..
,,
•..._.. .,,!,.... --........_‘L...._i,-,...., E,,,...z.,,,L (.. . _
/ ... , ,, II
: I VI) 1 ;1 i t.42, .. 1 ,,_.... .
: -N, r —.--r
J (IVIICHALA ' GELO • AntiElvs.• ;"" . .
• ,• /i ,., --,, :g,- ;.,',,\,,/./, ,:i,! -2 • • .. ... .
/ ‘ c••••1._ „ , );:•,,,.)..• ..,\/•,: , -' • - ;
/ 1 i : - - -\ \.• . -, --...,„ .L.
• ((v-•. ,, :.,,_.,••„,':::"4.-,.. 's:•,,.,(..1...
i . .
• ! .. 3\-.... .,.—..,:-",(.• ,Vs'sHADY OAK 5TI-;i; i; I/
I: /...',-.:',',,,,,ti''...."..6. .-...'.-.J.....)' ,. •,..•
: , . \ ...•,:....,... k.......,' ii..4,: .
. q ri .i/ ; ' 1 / ' ' ' . ( / i rel.O\• '
) '
. '1.--44--•:...:.::.'',`'''''''''', p 45 iii. ,
P , / -- I, ' ,'/ ' :. sip '''' . '.--,.•
•
J ! i4 i ,:i '..)r-4-n _ . ; . ---'•:7—l'ill'.g....L____.1 •:".. '-' LOCATION ' i
, •
..:'. 13
,,....„„,,,,,,--4.:-..s.n.......,—....f.........!.....0*
.,,
% ,1-_,, . ' .1 il I ' , * ''. 7/' ' - 'i • • ,' '
• ' '. _7 • it; : • :..' ')-.1 fr/ • ,, •1 •,,-.--7-i,, ‘., ; :. .:
.i.
Lperf;mr:...—::—..f--..•• -i Ic-J '',.'•.t)jIy'..'.'..„•. •:,','...i':,4,, , ,-*.--i)l, I"1.. •,,c.••1/4•",.k..‘s,.,c-N,1 t,',I.1.,,I,.,'IN t1\,1•'.,
1•, .. •-
. ,
• .1.1 HORN4 OREEg. II
.., • i. ,) J.7., .....0,‘‹i , ,;...,6,
6.) ....• . ,, ,) ________rc./Romelwilial
1 i ' ....._,,,.V )•)4.4'.: 1____• ••••
• ff
'. .:.1.4 '': ',-.'j 1 .-141-1,4!,‘‘\‘''''•
iiilat.S,J.1-( '',..-1.-.1-,_1., , '11 i'lt..2:11;-,(.. r.--•:.,- .•',.. /./
-r- ? .
t
Fm.D. .i 1••-•
. cIt„,io,,r.„,4.,.•.•' , .. , 1 ' /
—......
Thorn
• Creek
:
, Place
110
. •,•,.,..,,,(..„.;',...=-.3.--.,... : !4.,,,,i:2„
i '',/t;,'fi•\•)11';i4..i"."4M ,/
1,..,)..,;q". ..., Meat Cutters Pension lurid• n.,.....V '' - '),111' '1'
W..1
• WO I.. ••••
:11... : ' ..//:... • ;
(
•
• Eden Prairie. Mn. es Ow magewsnm el
I
IN Imme I "1
12
, Howard Dahlgren Associates Cl• 0
, .
v, Laud Planning Consultants H
..
. •...'...%‘' ,2 ' , ,fk‘
r , Mots. Minnesota N i.
..t..-_-) - 266 ‘
Staff Report -3- July 3, 1980
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff Recommends approval of the P.U.D. as submitted subject to
the following:
1. Cash Park fee would be applicable to this development.
2. Prior to any grading a permit must be obtained from the Nine-Mile Creek
Watershed District.
3. A connection must be built to connect this project with Michaelangelo
Gardens prior to or at the time of construction of the northern most
building.
4. All development is subject to rezoning and plat review.
5. A substantial amount of housing must be introduced into the plan.
6. The development plan submitted shall be considered a maximum ground
coverage for future review of the wooded portions of the site.
7. Engineering Department review of road •widths and R.O.W. widths.
8. A pedestrian system to be submitted for review by the Planning Commis-
sion.
CE:ss
•
•
204s
z
•
•
1979 DEVELOPMENT
z
p�
i
C.A' —I-I I - �,J .. r� -lc': ,_..
7 .YrL .l;) 'fit"--�'''''' .t '- :" 11'
•
. X) t3 r<,i4 j r. r• �'
• i
m F aa'
Cr) CI l``4t f T y, J-: + '�
O , 4 c)R, " .:7 • V . .a4 t:,c
0 as j,a c-'C�`1t ` w i•. . • t / ��. list rt i
m FC
-7$7
N �' •
1 1—, N l `< •:i d s v
•, �. i l
Y1 f' < 0
riki4j,,.l
t S 0 .t —
�, rd <z- >• ! ZA' v ()
._.,.r rr y -- .. 1.
ct r'
, ,en mm
l�y.J
1•.it-L 11.
V.r~`
•
p ¢p Minnesota
y4 e• Department of Transportation
c District 5
To 2055 No. Lilac Drive
4''o;TRi,�''' Golden Valley, Minnesota 554,22
July 18, 1980 ua_1:..r,.r.r.i
•
1
Mr. Chris Enger, Planning Director 1
City of Eden Prairie .
3950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
In reply refer to: 315 • 9
SP 2763 TH 169-212 1
Plat review of Thorn Creek Place located �.
North and West of Co. Rd. 39 and East of 1
TH 169-212 in part of Section 12, Township 116,
Range 22 in the City of Eden Prairie
Hennepin County
Dear Mr. Fngcr: i
We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in peers 'mce
with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. lt'e find the
plat acceptable for further development with consideration of the following
( comments: .,
- Our District Hydraulics Fhgineer, Mr. John Boynton indicated in his
review that the proposed development adversely affects our drainage
facilities and would like to review final drainage pl: s for Cie area
:`,hen r ey .:re available. We also noted the pro;' . .:re a
permit from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed Distric_.
at 545-3761, ext. 126 if you have any questions in 7 '"1 to t'.hoc {t
- Oar District ?pad Surveyor, Nr. Keith Slater, :,11C - .. ..? 1 .. .
of the project to coitact him Then doing the I nil b:•:..'cy ,:,•:crYs
adjacent to the highway right of way. his phone na h r • -7o1. .
ext. 199.
- If you have not already done so the plat should he schuttted to the
:;nci'in County Department of Transportation for rev ,-1:. ;".,,:y ;ill
h:ve to approve access to Co. Rd. 39.
If you have any questions about the above comments, please ;.,:Tact our f ,..r: ,
Research end Development Engineer, Mr. J. S. Katz at 545-3761, ext. 150.
Thank v'ou for your cooperation in this matter.
Sineer.,ly; - • •
-
:; r
W. M. Cr,n..crd, F. '
District rn!.;incer
cc: Charles ':c:av.r, 'k t ropolitan Council
Mike Reiter, :i.linepin County Surveyor's Office
Doug Mattson, Hennepin County Dept. of Transportation
An Equal Orprnrnilly Enrp:oyer
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ; �
• 320 Washington Av. South +•4't' j
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 \`'`'{ ;
HENNEPIN
_it 935-3381
July 3, 1980
Mr. Chris Enger, Planning Director
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road •
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Dear Mr. Enger:
RE Proposed Plat - "Thorn Creek Place"
County Road 39 NE quad TH 169/212
Section 12, Township 116, Range 22
Hennepin County Plat No. 843
Review and Recommendations
Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review
of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and found
it acceptable with consideration of these conditions:
-The developer should dedicate an additional 17 ft. of right of way making the
right of way 50 ft. from the center of County Road 39.
-Although the sight distance is very limited in the area, our Traffic Division
determined the best location for the westerly drive is approximately 400 ft.
west of Smetana Lane. The access shown on the plat must be moved approximately
70 ft. west to meet this requirement. •
-The easterly proposed access, which meets sight distance requirements for the
posted 35 mph, is a good access location.
-Any new access to a county road requires an approved Hennepin County entrance
permit. See our Traffic Division for entrance permit forms.
-All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved
utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not
limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and land-
scaping. See our Maintenance Division for utility permit forms.
-The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within County
right of way.
Please direct any response or questions to Les Weigelt.
cerely, •
�
. /11 1i/L
awes M. Wold, P.E. •
HENNEPIN COUNTY
Chief, Planning and Programming 20(0g an equal oppodunlly employer
LD-80-PUD-12
Thorn Creek
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 444
RESOLUTION 80-152
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE THORN CREEK PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT AND AMENDING THE 1968 GUIDE PLAN AND THE
MAJOR CENTER AREA PUD
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of Ordinance 135
provided for the Planned Unit Development ( PUD ) of certain areas
located within the City, and
WHEREAS, the Thorn Creek PUD is considered a proper amendment to
the 1968 Comprehensive Guide Plan and the Major Center Area PUD, and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing
on Minneapolis Retail Meat Cutters & Food Handlers Health & Welfare
Fund's request for PUD approval for office, commercial, multiple residen-
tial, and park uses and recommended approval of the PUD Concept to the
City Council, and
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on August 19, 1980.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota as follows:
1. The Thorn Creek PUD, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota,
and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, attached
hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD approval as outlined
in the application material dated May 30, 1980.
3. That the PUD meet the recommendations of the Planning
Commission dated July 14, 1980.
ADOPTED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie this _ day of
1980.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
•
John Frane, City Clerk SEAL
2O6q
August 19, 1980 •
STA" OF MINNESOTA
CIT. JF EDEN PRAIRIE
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows:
2593 VOID OUT CHECK $ (367.70.`�
2757 RIVERS EDGE TUBING Expenses-Rec dept 117.00 '.
2753 PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL ASSOCIATES Rent-Liquor store 1,892.13
2759 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. Liquor 950.7t
276) JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE Liquor 524.35
2761 OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. Wine 492.5
276: MIDWEST WINE CO"!PANY Wine 543.0
27t3 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO. Liquor 794.1:
27E4 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Payroll • 13,355.2
2765 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE Payroll 205.0
27E6 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS Payroll 29.5,
Payroll 9,097.7
2707 PERA Y 27f23 DOWN TO EARTH Timber walls-Park dept 2 30,1„r•-
276? MARY M. KENNY Expenses 18.4 I
277; JOHNSCN WINE CO. Wine 251.4.
"' INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CD. Wine 90.2
EDEN PRAIRIE SNG'„I•iOBILE CLUB Reimbursement of state subsidy 1,7:3'.
2773 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. Liquor 2,503.`
2774 TWIN CITY WINE CO. Wine 610.4.
271- MIDWEST WINE CO. Wine 259.3
27e., JOHNSON WINE CO. Liquor 1,534.E
2777 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. Wine 392.?
2778 EAGLE WINE CO. Wine 261.1 ',
2779 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO. Liquor 1,236.7
2780 BUTCH'S BAR SUPPLY Supplies-Liquor store 220.e
2781 RAWHIDE RANCH MEATS Beef jerky-Liquor store 85.C. ;.
2782 HOPKINS POSTMASTER Postage 167.2• .
2783 DAVID RICHARDSON Expenses-Liquor store 50.0
2784 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE CO. Insurance 370.C:
2785 BLUE CROSS INSURANCE Insurance 532.4
2766 HMO SERVICES Insurance 122.1
2787 HMO SERVICES Insurance 1,305.6. •
2788 GROUP HEALTH PLAN, INC. Insurance 988.7..
2789 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN Insurance 6,036.e
2790 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE Delivery charge 26.6
.2791 MINNESOTA TWINS Expenses-Senior Citizens 55.e
.'a'
2792 BECKI WARNER Mileage 7
2793 BEER WHOLESALERS INC Beer 3,586.3.q,8lbl62 .
2794 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. Beer 2795 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO. • Beer 5,285285.E
2796 LEDING DISTRIBUTING CO. Beer 3,3, 39.07
' 2797 ROUILLARD BEVERAGE CO. INC. Beer 2,368.1
279B THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO. Beer
2799 A & H WELDING & MFG CO. Filling device-Water dept, plates for paver-Park 58.6
2£ ABBEON CAL, INC. Humidity indicator-Water dept 74.5
2&ur. AMERICAN EXCELSIOR COMPANY Erosion control blanket-Park dept 267.7
2802 VOID OUT CHECK 20.�, ',
2303 LISA ANDERSON Refund-Rec dept 270 ,
2804 RON ANDERSON Wiring new fire car lO �,
2805 LISA VAN ASTEN Refund-Rec dept
Zci/O
I
'
Page two
August 19, 1960
28P AUDIO BRANDON FILMS, INC. Film-Rec dept 51.00
28 , AUTO-SOUND CO. Speed test squad car 15.00
2808 MARY BARTHOLOMEW Refund-Rec dept 12.0,
2809 BRW Service-Temp signal on TH 169, Lotus View Drive,18,324.2:
Dell Road, TH#5 & West 78th Street & Mitchell Rd,
Anderson Lakes Parkway
2810 RAE BLY Mileage 56.1:'
2811 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING Service-High Trails, Shady Oak Road Phase II, 1,150.17
Round Lake Estates, Cardinal Creek
2813 BROWN PHOTO Develop film-Rec dept 17.2
2813 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. Rock 4,074.77'
2814 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE Subscription-Water dept 61.0
2015 BUSINESS FURNITURE INCORPORATED Chair mat-Police dept 34.0
281& STEPHEN CALIIOON Mileage 23•`
2817 CARDARELLE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Boundary survey-Park dept 1,275.G
2813 CHANHASSEN AUTO PARTS Muffler, fuel pump, spark plugs, coil for sweeper 503.7
electronic switch, starter parts, wiring-Street dept
2819 TODD CHERLANO Expenses-Rec dept 49.F '
28i0 CITY OF EDINA Tests 149.'
2821 CLUTCH & U-JOINT BURNSVILLE, INC. Equipment repair & parts-Park dept 18.•1
2822 LYNN CONWAY Refund-Rec dept 2.0
2823 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. Pencils, scale,x-acto blades, flagging tape 119.
2824 TIM COTA Refund-Rec dept 6•'
2825 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CO. Desk signs 28.'.'
2826 MARGARET CUMMINGS Expenses-Rec dept 9.t'
22 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY Quicklime-Water dept 1,830.`
282d A.B. OICK COMPANY Paper 196.0
2829 CLYDE DIGIT & FAI•IILY Workshop-Creative Drama 900.0
2830 DORHOLT PRINTING & STATIONERY Office supplies 115.2
2831 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPT Expenses-Fire dept 185.E
2832 EDEN PRAIRIE GROCERY Pop-Rec dept 9.5
2833 EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS Ads-Liquor store 52.
2834 EDEN PRAIRIE SANITATION CO. Service 63.0
2835 MATT EMRY Refund-Rec dept 20.0
2836 FABRI-GRAPHICS T-Shirts-Rec dept 73.?
2837 FAIRVIEW COMMUNITY HOSPITALS Tests 25.E
2838 FEED-RITE CONTROLS, INC. Sulfate-Water dept 1,662.; '
2839 JOHN J. FOX Service-Retaining wall 993.;
2840 FDX VALLEY MARKING SYSTEMS, INC. Spray paint-Water dept 58.4
2841 FRONTIER LUMBER & HARDWARE Lumber 105.
2842 CAROL FURY Mileage 24.f
2843 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Equipment repair & parts 164.
2844 GENERAL ENGINEERING & EQUIPMENT Bolts-Street dept 75.5
2845 GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT CORP Temp gauge-Fire dept 33..7
2846 ANDREA GONZALA Refund-Rec dept 8.'
2847 GRAHAM PAPER Paper 462.i
2843 DALE GREEN CO. Sod 67..
2849 GROSS INDUSTRIAL SERVICES Service 75.i.
2850 STEVEN W. HAFINFELDT Expenses-Fire dept 31.
2851 HARMON GLASS Glass-Park dept 21..
2: HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION Board of prisoners 1,552.0
2853 ALLENE HODIIAM Instructor • 100.0
2854 HOPKINS OOOGE SALES, INC. Equipment repair & parts 366.1
2855 HOPKINS PARTS CO. Equipment repair & parts 118.'2
23S6 WILLIAM HORNIG Mileage 33.
20'71
Page three
August 19, 1980
2857 BRIAN JOHNSON Refund-Rec dept 2.00
28 CARL JULLIE Expenses 3.50'
2859 KARULF HARDWARE INC. Pliers, ruler, maul, peck, shovel-Eng dept, paint, 655.81
nozzles-Fire dept, padlocks, hose, rakes, tape, pipe
wrench, caulk-Street dept, glue gun, pruner, sprinkler,
Park dept, hose-Water dept 499.51.
2860 KRAEMER'S HOME CENTER Ladder, valve, fire hydrant paint to match
existing colors-Not available anywhere else
2861 MARV LAHTI Expenses-Fire dept 47.9i,`
2862 VOID OUT CHECK 108 &
2363 LANDCO EQUIPMENT, INC. Seat-Community Services E ;
286.1 LEEF BROS. INC. 152.
Service 1,152 8
2865 LOGIS Service
2866 DIANE MATTSON Softball official 11.0
2857 MC FARLANES, INC. Concrete 48.0
2863 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIPMENT CO. Oxygen 23.8
2869 MERIT PRINTING Forms-Building dept 170.0
2870 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL Service 21,592.E
2871 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION Blacktop 4,200.?
2872 MIKE'S GLENROSE FLORAL Service 32.'
2873 MINNESOTA FIRE INC. Air tanks-Fire dept 75.1
2874 MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY Service 20.1
2875 MINNESOTA TORO, INC. Pulley, bearing assy 133..
2876 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP Service 24.1
2877 MINNESOTA VALLEY LANDSCAPE INC. Tree removal 400.0
2878 MODERN TIRE CO. Equipment repair & parts 186.F:<
2 MUNICIPAL & PRIVATE SERVICES, INC. Service 995.
2880 SHELEEN NELSON Refund-Rec dept 2.0 .
2881 VOID OUT CHECK 2,616.E
2882 NORTHWESTERN BELL Service
2683 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY Service 4,294.?.;
2884 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK OF MPLS Interest payment 105,242.
2885 NORTHWOOD GAS COMPANY Gas cylinder 8.1
2886 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE Rope-Park dept 15.E
2887 W. G. PEARSON, INC. Rock 130.?
2888 PENNY'S SUPERMARKET #25 Supplies-Rec dept, coffee-City Hall 275.E.
2889 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO. Pop-Rec dept 457.0
2890 DONALD PETERSON Service 26.2
2891 JACQUES PHILIPPON Refund-Rec dept 20.0.
2892 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING, INC. Forms-Police dept 204.('
2893 RAPID COPY, INCORPORATED Liquor ID cards 25.1
2894 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER,qSOC. Service-Ind. Rd Utilities, Gonyea Develop 28,842.c ..
Drainage, Homeward Hills Road, Round Lake
Utilities Phase II, High Trails Swr & Wtr, Valley
View Road, Pedestrian Bridges,Shady Oak Ind. Park,
Shady Oak Ext, 70th Street Improvements, Round Lake
Estates 2nd addition, Lake Idlewild Drainage Improve,
• Cardinal Creek Estates, 1980 Westgate addition
2895 ROBERTS DRUG Supplies-Rec dept 34.,,
2896 MRS. ALEC RUTH Supplies 55.!,`.
21Q7 SPS COMPANIES, INC. Valve-Street dept 76
2 3 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS Supplies-Rec dept 39.L;
2399 TODD SALMON Refund-Rec dept • 12.1
2900 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES, INC. Portable restrooms-Park dept 2,486.(
2901 SCHMIDT SOD COMPANY Sod 601.
2902 SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. Service-Chatham Wood 3,286. :'„
202-
Page four
August 19, 1980
r
2903 GERALD SCHWANKL Dues-Fire dept 10.00
2904 STEVEN R. SINELL Mileage-Assessing dept 102.93
2905 SMILEY GLOTTER ASSOCIATES INCORP Service-Eden Prairie Community Center 20,805.95
2906 W. GORDON SMITH CO. Fluid for air compressor 38.05
2907 FAYE SMITH'WICK Refund-Rec dept 13.00
2908 SOIL TESTING SERVICES Service-Water treatment plant 2,198.0.E
2909 DANNY SOL.BERG Refund-Rec dept 20.00
2910 VERNON STEPPE Wiring for copy machine-Water dept 118.55
2911 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CO. Equipment repair & parts 117.91
2912 E.A. SWEEN COMPANY Sandwiches-Rec dept 111.5'
2913 MARC LE1J1S THIFL?IAN Expenses 63.0
2914 DAN THOMrSON TENNIS SCHOOL Tennis instructors 1,123.`
2915 CARRIE TIETZ Minutes-Park & Rec 42.0
2916 TOWN EDGE FORD, INC. Equipment repair & parts 87.c
2917 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS Supplies-Rec dept 69...
2913 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Equipment rental 9.7.,
2919 VALLEY EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment repair & parts 59.5
29:'J VAN WATERS & ROGERS Chlorine-Water dept 253.'
2921 VAUGHN'S INCORPOR'1TED Flag-Water dept 136.C:
2922 VESSCO Chlorinator repair & parts 127.92
123 WATER .:;)DUCTS Ci,'M?Arf! Equipment repair & parts 3,15:.
2924 WEBER & TROSETH INC. Helmets-Fire dept 80.1 '
2925 WESTERN CONTAINER CORPORATION 55 gallon drums-Park dept 104.0.
292A ANGELA WORTMAN Refund-Rec dept 6.O.'
29: ZEP MANUFACTURING CO. Choke & carburetor cleaner 67.04
2928 EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS Legal ads 583.83
2929 XEROX CORPORATION Microfilming-Engineering dept 229.11
2930 AMY ALLEN Teen Work wages 50.4_ `
2931 DAVID ANDERSON Teen Work wages 54.6
2932 LISA BERNTSEN Teen Work wages 56.71
2933 CARL BLAD Teen Work wages 31.5C"
2934 ANN DIEDE Teen Work wages 59.5e
2935 LORI FERRIS Teen Work wages 60.20
2936 PAUL FRIEDERICHS Teen Work wages 29.4:
2937 PEGGY GILK Teen Work wages 52.5'.
2938 SHEILA HALEY Teen Work wages 25.91
2939 RICK HAUPT Teen Work wages 35.7i:
2940 SONJA HAYDEN Teen Work wages 21.0i
2941 FAITH JARRATT Teen Work wages 80.5
2942 AMY JOHNSON Teen Work wages 78.4.
'2943 SUZANNE JOHNSON Teen Work wages 8.4 '.'
2944 SHARON JOHNSON Teen Work wages 8.4.
2945 CHRIS KELLY Teen Work wages 61.6'
2946 TONY KELLY Teen Work wages 61.6•
2947 JENNY KRANTZ Teen Work wages .8.4.
.2943 PAUL KUJAIJA Mileage 135.o:
2949 KENDRA LEHNERTZ Teen Work wages 8.4
2950 DAVID MARTYR Teen Work wages 32.9
2951 LISA MCFADDEN Teen Work wages 70.0
29 DAN PIERRE Teen Work wages 82.6n
2953 JAMES RASMUSSEN Teen Work wages • 54.6,
2954 TRACEY ROTHNEM Teen Work wages 24.5
2955 JOHN SCHMIDT Teen Work wages 2`-••'"
2956 LANCE STAMPFLI Teen Work wages 79.1(1
2.0 J
•
Page five
August 19, 1980
2957 BRETT TREPTOW Teen Work wages 49•D".
2958 STEPHANIE VAN ASTEN Teen Work wages 52.5'
2959 DEAN VOLK Teen Work wages 58.1u
2960 KATHY WEAVER Teen Work wages 64.4'•
2961 KELLY WHALEN Teen Work wages
2962 LUND PAINT & DECORATING Paint-Park dept 156./„
2963 OFFICE OF THE STATE REGISTER Copies of State Aid Operations-Eng dept 2.2~.
2964 ST. REGIS PAPER COMPANY Steel posts-Bikeway 192.5:
2965 VALLEY EQUIPMENT CO. Rental-Bikeway 1,850.0
2965 M.G. ASTLEFORD CO., INC. Shady Dak Industrial Park 126,270.9
2967 BROWN & CRIS Staring Lake & Flying Cloud Improvements 6,558.E
2963 BROWN & CRIS Duck Lake Vista 27,325.2
2969 BROWN & CRIS Cardinal Creek Addition 33,548.0
297D BROWN & CRIS Cardinal. Creek 64,566.J
2971 BROWN & CRIS Trunk Highway 5, W 78th St & Mitchell Road 150,276.
2972 BROWN & CRIS Valley View Road Phase I 1754600.-
2973 BROWN & CRIS High Trails Estates Utilities 137,431.
2974 BROWN & CRIS Dell Road &Lotus View Drive
2975 W.J. EBERTZ, INC. Bryant Lake Park 13,070.`
2976 G.L. CONTRACTING, INC. Shady Oak Industrial Park Phase II 7,159.
2977 RICHARD KNUTSON, INC. Country Vista 620.
2973 NODLAND ASSOCIATES, INC. Chatham Wood Addition Improvements 110,449.;.
2979 NODLAND ASSOCIATES, INC. Lake Trail Estates Swr & Wtr 16,067.E
29f NORTHERN CONTRACTING, INC. Round Lake Area Utilities 82,205.EE •
2981 ROGER ULSTAD • Expenses 43.C'
TOTAL �51,285,314.
•
{
2U"7 q
SIl2
NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55401
August 13, 1980
Honorable Mayor and City I.
City of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie, MN 55343
Attn: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
EDEN PRAIRIE SUBSTATION
345/115 kv rt,
Northern States Power Company is having some difficulties in
acquiring a proper easement across what would be on property
owned by the Fotomark Company and would be located north of
their existing building. 1
We have tried to satisfy this company with fair compensation for
the easement north of their existing building. NSP would, for the
use of the easement, grant to them 1.25 acres of the adjacent
property to the west for their proposed addition plus $25,000 in •
cash for the easement needed for the 345 kv tap into the proposed
Eden Prairie Substation. Their counter offer (Fotomark) was the
1.25 acres of property plus $100,000 or condem for approximately
$900,000 (nine hundred thousand) . A solution to this, we feel,
is to locate our existing 345 kv transmission line tap approximately
300' to the south adjacent to 78th Street and completely miss Foto-
mark, therefore not requiring any easement from them and giving them
the opportunity for their future expansion.
In addition, at this location we would also remove the three existing
wood poles that are located on the present easement adjacent to
Rosemount Engineering and replacing with only one additional structure
cleaning up the area as far as visual esthetics.
In addition, NSP agreed in the Developer's Agreement that we would
grade and landscape our property during the year of 1981. Because
of an additional problem with the City sewer (which has a proper
easement located on our property) and in discussion with your City
Engineer, Carl Julie, the proposed substation berming would take
place over the existing sewer line. This would cause too much weight
over that sewer line, and would require NSP to relocate at our expense.
This will take additional time for relocation, receiving drawings from
20 5
•
Roger i'lstad-City of Eden Prairie
Page 2
August 13, 1980
the consultant engineering firm of Rieke, Carroll and Muller
Associates Inc. We are asking that the grading and berming,
and including the landscaping, be delayed to completion of June
1982.
We would respectfully request that the City Council would review
these problems that we have encountered and provide an answer to
us in writing. Whatever determination is made by Council we will
abide by their decision. Thank you for your time and understanding.
1142 /6%;--'"("--d
D J CHMTEL
Staff Assistant
Environmental & Regulatory
Activities Department
ve
20%
•
•
{
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services {rQ'�''
DATE: August 14, 1980
SUBJECT: Hidden Ponds Park Plan
At the August 19, 1980 meeting, staff will present the proposed master
plan for Hidden Ponds Park. This plan has been reviewed and approved
by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission at the August
4 meeting. Prior to that meeting, a letter with a copy of the plan was
sent to residents in the service area inviting them to the August 4
meeting to discuss the park plan and make recormendations for any changes
they may feel were necessary.
At the August 19 meeting, staff would request the City Council to reivew
and approve the plan so we are able to proceed with development of this
park.
BL:md
•
•
•
2077
,.: ..
. . .
..HIDDEN PONDS PARK
i ....—.--/
VALLE .................._____............
I VIE in
n040
‘,...4,Z,ri:e ,•.•1%,ry. ,
11 1
ci ' a •
"11 I
• o
ef- irl 11 1
0
srlfzeniza ,,
0:
0-- •
A ,- ./.
„efeer. .?"
4!"%:4-AtaNi 1\ /;" [11
‘...,'"?'\,<#.74,S'-'
/ ....$.4,
/ `-' ''' /FOOTBALL/
r.,,ll
....." . , _,.
, .,;›-----
r: ... „....n ,A.,`•
, ,‘P
0 em
11 -
a
11 4
C.3 . 0 a 1
c.
, J.=
/,./
,-..‘ - SHELTER a
,i- n.
FREE
P'":1 SOFTBALL II 1
(...3 K A T 1 N 0 (60(we n
r)
\A( -:---c•, • '
. ...„,
i ( ‘ ..,1: ,.\TT, T...-)1vEr, ' rizze.., ,,..-cluwi!L,f. ....•
. • „ ,,,,,.., ,•,, (....1 fas
S.e.A. 4\\;/........•>-•-:"---,.. "..... ,j
..;;;.,4:,,' ......,
< .....—•.•• -kiki.....ce.s. ,..... _..".....4„soc....20.\\A
1 1
/4%., ......-NT.-)..f•',,....ste N.s..-..,•.,411
1 ho ca t wzi w riv4a ti firra4"4“Bwoul ri irtrtil U I:: I
-...x.2 04 0+1,.—*.s.:3 %U....
1
�+�--�r�
CmOFFICES/8950 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD/EDEN PRAIRIE.MINNESOTA 55344/TELEPHONE 161210374262 �,..i�.i
pep
•
•
July 18, 1980
1
Hidden Ponds Area
RE: Neighborhood Park
Dear Resident:
In 1974, the City proposed acquiring a 15 acre park to serve the Hidden
Ponds area. The following year a park bond referendum that included
acquisition and development of that park area failed. Finally, in 1979
the park bond referendum that included acquisition and development of
Hidden Ponds Neighborhood Park passed by nearly a 2 to 1 margin. The
park, located east of Dell Road and southeast of the abandoned railroad i
track, was acquired in June of 1980.
On August 4, 1980, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
will be reviewing the schematic plan for development of Hidden Ponds Park.
A copy of the schematic plan is enclosed. First phase development of this
park will include grading and seeding of the entire park area, development •
of the softball field, football field, skating area,road access and parking.
This is to be completed during the spring of 1981. Second phase develop-
ment will include construction of a totlot, playground area, park shelter,
two tennis courts and a multi-use court. This is to be completed in the
fall of 1981.
•
All residents are invited to attend the August 4 meeting of the Parks,
Recreation and Natural Resources Commission to provide any input they may
feel is necessary to improve this plan. The meeting begins at 7:30 p.m.
at the City Hall Council Chambers. I look forward to seeing you on August
4th.
Sincerely,
ZOC^fr'IM"'A
Roabert A. Lambert
Director of Community Services
RAL:md
4
encl:
•
20'79
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services —
DATE: August 14, 1980
SUBJECT: Request Authority to Advertise for Bids for the Grading and
Seeding of Hidden Ponds Park and Creekwood Park
City staff have reviewed plans for Creekwood Park and Hidden Ponds Park with
the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and residents within
the service areas. The plans for both of these parks have met with favorable
• review from both the residents and the Commission.
The City Council reviewed and approved the Creekwood Park plan on June 17, 1980,
and will review the Hidden Ponds Park plan on August 19, 1980. Staff would
suggest that these two grading projects be included in one bid in order to
increase the size of the bid and hopefully get a more favorable bid price.
Staff requests to advertise for these projects on August 28, September 4 and
September 11, 1980, and to receive bids on October 2, 1980 at 2:00 p.m. in the
{: City Council CHambers.
Estimated cost for grading and seeding of these parks is $20,000 for Creekwood
Park and $18,000 for Hidden Ponds Park. Acquisition and development of both
of these parks was included in the 1979 Park Bond Referendum.
BL:md
•
•
zoWO
•
•
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager ����
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services 0A"'"
DATE: August 14, 1980
SUBJECT: Request Authorization to Adverise for Bids for Construction
of the Eden Prairie Community Center
Staff requests the approval for authority to advertise for sealed proposals
for the multiple (separate) prime bids (1. general construction, 2. mechanical
work, 3. electrical work, 4. ice rink system,) for the construction of Eden
Prairie Community Center, Eden Prairie, Minnesota. To be advertised on
August 21, August 28 and September 4 and to be opened and publicly read aloud
in the City Council room, City Hall, 8950 Eden Prairie Road, Eden Prairie,
Minnesota at 2:00 p.m. CDT, September 25, 1980.
The contract documents will be available from Smiley Glotter Associates on
or about September 2, 1980.
At this time, staff would also request the Council to consider scheduling
•
a special Council meeting to review bids on September 30, 1980.
The City staff has also had a question from one of the Community Center
Committee members asking if the Council planed to have a special meeting
to review plans and specifications prior to releasing them for bid.
BL:md
2G�
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
( Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Conmission
THUR: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager i
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services '
I
DATE: August 14, 1980
SUBJECT: Round Lake Treatment and Restocking Program
As you may recall, on March 18, 1980, the City Council voted to approve the
recommendation of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and a
staff, to authorize staff to proceed with the lake management program at Round
Lake. This program consisted of a monitoring program over the next three years
and commitment for expenditures estimated at $3,500 for destratification of the
lake in September of this year and an estimated $12,D00 for purchase of an
aeration system to be installed prior to the winter of 1981. i
This program was for two purposes: 1. to improve the quality of the water y.
of Round Lake, 2. to improve the recreational value of the lake by improving
the fishing on the lake. 1
Mr. Duane Shodeen, Department of Natural Resources, informs me that they would 1
like to treat the lake on either the 11th or 12th of September (treatment date
will vary depending on weather conditions). Three weeks after the treatment
date, the DNR will stock the lake with sunfish, bass and walleyes. A few of
these sunfish will be of catchable size the following summer. However, it
will be approximately 18 months before we really know if the stocking program
has been a success.
Prior to treating the lake, the DNR will provide information in the local paper
on when the lake is to be treated and warning people not to fish out of the
lake or eat any fish from the lake. The lake will also be posted with signs
during and after the treatment process. The City has agreed to help the DNR
with the cleanup of the dead fish.
I have met with two sales representatives regarding destratification of the lake
prior to treatment and aeration of the lake after treatment. Both represented
companies that sold bubbler type systems. (This is the type of system necessary
to install to destratify the lake.)
Clean Flo proposed a system with four half horsepower compressors and six
diffussers that would move 720,000 gallons/hr. from the bottom of the lake to
the surface, for a rental cost of $2,925. (Rental of $975/mo., minimum 3 months)
Purchase price for this system installed is $9,360.
Waldor Pump proposed an aeration system with one 7'Z horsepower compressor and
one hclixor diffusser that would move 960,000 gallons/hr. from the bottom of
the lake to the surface, for a rental cost of $1,000/mo. (with 50", going toward
purchase price) if the City uses its own compressor. Purchase price inlcuding
( their compressor is $3,730.
2U`62-
tp
-2-
( These aeration systems would run throughout the winter months to maintain
oxygen levels in the lake sufficient for sustaining game fish.
Both of these systems have been proven to be successful in providing aeration
for lakes. The Waldor system is obviously much cheaper of the two. Their only
drawback is that both sytems will create an area of open water on Round Lake
throughout the winter. Although, we would sign the open water area every 75
feet as per state regulations, it would be a hazard.
The other alternative is to either pump fresh water into the lake through a
bubbler system in the later winter months or to construct a recirculation system
that would pump water out of the bottom of the lake and run it through an
underground baffle system and back into the lake. These systems are expensive •
and cost estimates range from $29,000 to $40,900 depending on if a well is
needed and how much pipe is required. (The water must be pumped at least 20
feet above the lake level to run it back over baffles.)
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City purchase and install the Waldor Pump system to
destrafity the lake and retain the system for aeration of the lake. This
would only be operated late in the winter when oxygen levels begin to fall off,
usually from late February until ice melt.
BL:md
•
•
2073
August 15, 1980
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.R80-160
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
OF BRAUN'S ESTATES
WHEREAS, the plat of Braun's Estates has been sub-
mitted in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance
Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been
duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and •
the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordin-
ances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat Approval Request for Braun's Estates is approved
upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
Report on this plat dated August 13, 1980
B, That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of
this resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Regis- •
trar of Titles for thier use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy
of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named
plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute
the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon com-
pliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on
• W&f ang H. Penzel, Mayor—- ——
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. I rane, Clerlc
20$q
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM; Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: August 13, 1980
SUBJECT: Braun's Estates
PROPOSAL: The developer, Braun-Kaiser & Company, is requesting City Council
approval of the final plat for Braun's Estates, located south of Shady Oak
Industrial Park 5th Addition and north of Valley View Road in Section 12.
The total area of the plat is approximately 26 acres, the easterly 9.5
acres of which has been zoned I-2 Park, with the remainder of the area
being Rural.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on June 17,
1980, per Resolution No. R80-98.
Zoning to I-2 Park for the easterly 9.5 acres (Lot 1, Block 1) was finally
read and approved by the City Council on July 15, 1980. Future development
of Outlot A will require platting and zoning approvals.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed on
July 15, 1980.
VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of
appeal s
UTILITIES AND STREETS: The requirements for the installation of municipal 1
utilities and streets are covered in the Developer's Agreement.
The Developer's Agreement requires a total of 17' additional right-of-way and
a maximum 7 degree curve to be platted along County Road N39. This dedica-
tion must be made on the final plat prior to release for filing.
PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the
Developer s Agreement. �.
BONDING: The requirements for bonding are covered in the Developer's Agreement.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Braun's Estates
subject fo the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and
the following:
1. Receipt of fee for City Engineering services in the amount of $500.
2. Receipt of cash deposit in the amount of $393.60 to cover the cost
( of street lighting.
2-O�S
•
MEMO
TO: Mayor Fenzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
OATE: August 15, 1980
SUBJECT: Feasibility Study for Orainage Improvements
Sutton First Addition I.C. 51-370
The feasibility study for storm drainage improvements in the Sutton First
Addition was received by the Council on July 15, 1980. The Council directed
the Staff to further explore alternatives and to confer with the developer
regarding the assessment costs for this project.
A copy of the feasibility study was given to Mr. Sutton for his review. He
then forwarded the study to Mr. Orlyn Miller, his engineering consultant. I
spoke recently to Mr. Miller who informed me that he would be conferring
with Mr. Sutton and would try to have some response to the study by Tuesday
evening, August 19.
The Council may wish to discuss the possibility of doing this project by
day labor (City crews) rather than by private contractor. The cost for
materials only to,complete the job would be about $13,000. Perhaps Mr. Sutton
could supply the materials and City crews could do the installation on the
basis that the.improvements would be correcting a somewhat existing drain-
•
age maintenance problem.
•
CJJ:kh
4r
August 15, 1980
j
CITY DF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R80153
RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE .
ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF 1980 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLS
AND SETTING HEARING DATE
WHEREAS, contracts have been let for the following listed improve-
ments and the total project cost, including expenses incurred, or to be incurred,
and the City's share, exclusive of that assignable to City property, are
established as follows:
AMOUNT
TOTAL CITY TO BE
PROJECT COST ($) FUNDS ($) ASSESSED ($)
(See attached Exhibit A)
NOW,.THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
I. The cost of such improvements to be specially assessed are
hereby declared to be those as set forth above.
2. The City Clerk with the assistance of the City Engineer
shall forthwith calculate the proper'amouht to be assessed for
each improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel
of land within the district affected without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of
such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection.
3. A hearing shall be held on the I6th day of September, I980, in
the City Hall at 7:30 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assess-
ments and at such time and place all persons owning property
affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity
to be heard with reference to such assessments.
4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the
hearing on the proposed assessments to be published once in the
official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing.
He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner
of record of each parcel described in the assessment roll not
less than two weeks prior to the hearing,
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
2Ori
•
W
t y . •
4 N
W
In •-1 ••-1 PI r1
QID ••-• v-1 v-1
M 01 I... I..
W M ID I.. co
M V) •-• N
O O N ID W
~ .r .r
h-
Z
01
al
V7
n
Z
7 IO O
N 00 • 17
•
If) Il)
I-- a It)
V �•
V) •
I- •
Z
W
7.Ls!
op
CO Q I-N
CS r1 I M •-•• NU
Ls! CV
Jcy, • • J
en
w "cc n i[ .^-1 00
N H CSN ID OI
O .•1 ~
00
OI
.r
in
N
• a) L
• EV+• �1•
. 0 0 M
. •
C•r N • E"0C
N Y 4 - 4-a
VI 7 .
4-1 O N >1.-1 el yJ L
.0 a.0 a) •0 .I• aa,C CU
3
( r Y n)Y 71 a)a+ >••
a)S C-0 0 Y 4" 4Y O)vs LN aI ,
0) Y C C VI 0/ D. . ~ N IO 3 W NY4
-1 C A r r C W 3- C
I VI4-1 al •a/VI•o a) 7 ^ a) VI 0 N '0 A O C
N r r O 0- in Y VI•. el C--I 0•
N e0 4/r•r CC/- CV4/ 10 Cr T3)-1 3- el n1 4.
N C ea as 'S C C J 'S C C+� . >.1C•
0 I' 00)
IY) 1n a)7• L a) m M i0 W M II 41 In u9 Y 7 IA..0
-. IA i+ > v/a.1JJ IA Y > 0) In y>Cab () 4.1
✓ rO� a/ 0)Ot r0.-• •
• NCKC
W •-• L r In. . • a1 L U • r- L 1-1 •=r a)0
0.10 C U U (.) L 0.4/ (-) CI.-IL
p • y E L 7 7 7 • 4-' E 4, E ea
e.
OC •-• O•r I-VI 0 0 I-• N•. f ••I O.I-a7 P')
G. •
• r1 C. M
i
i
I
CIyy�
W 3
y) e
V1 1
W O M 3
N)
to R O
Q O. rl O
W 1.0" 01 O cm - n
co coM 00 t0 In pp
N R M 1� ., N .ti 7
N t0 .ti
1- 4
z
7
O
vs
I
z
o
u.
>-
F
r-
t-1
N .
Obi
O VI M^
-.I lV 10
Q
O
F -
•
7
.0 S.
r� C C
0 C IA in
N r N
• i-.• M. N..CC 4-1 4-1
r en d v yC 0 .. LI
Lv EU C y
C I
_ YQ NN L W
•••t r 2
O IA N N N I- -J
�Vi 4.44 r Y�6 7 U C W N U.al VI 40 _ r r,
M v.0 to fa S. b) tel-1A b A y
01/1
10 C U U9 V In p r C 4.1 p O
.�-t tI A M yr d 1 E U aE) a
t~n iN•.E I( Y C to S. N•.- N S. U
.e1.3
t I- • O. N
( eP W •..) O. v Y S.
•
Yam- S. I— O. n. L ¢
IA
p Q .-•. VI)S r. 0 t.) •O 4-O V) V) F
W tf! tp f. 00 O. es .~r
t
W
W
H
a
W
co an a, 0
0 a, 00 4)
oo ri o
rr ct l0
v �o r)
H
p
4
0
c.�
J
a
0
•
N
c
0
u
•
rn of w
v d
q
Q F' OTC OTC W ..
IJJ
crt
0ce cc •Ec al
C C C
.0
W
M d•
r-4
MEMO
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: August 14, 1980
SUBJECT: Bids for Anderson Lakes Parkway
and Park Site Grading
1.C. 51-341
Bids are scheduled to be received at 10:00 o'clock A.M. on Monday, Aug-
ust 18,for the scheduled improvements on Anderson Lakes Parkway and the
adjoing park site grading. We will tabulate the bids received and present
our recommendation to the Council on Tuesday evening.
CJJ:kh
2ad8i
MEMO
(.
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Coun-il
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: August 15, 1980
SUBJECT: Change Order No. 4, I.C. 51-326
Dell Road •
Attached Contract Amendment No. 4 for the Dell Road project north of Duck
Lake Trail has been submitted for Council approval. This Change Order
incorporates the alignment change in Dell Road through the former Eden-
brook project which the Council has previously reviewed. This Change
Order also provides for some additional sidewalk and pathways along Dell
Road which will connect to the walkways to be included in the Dell Road/Val-
ley View Road project to be let in the near future.
Contract price increases are mostly eligible for funding from State Aid
funds. The non State Aid work involves the pathway addition of $9,180
( and additional City cost of $1,676 for non State Aid quantities of work.
The remaining contract increases will be eligible for participation by
State Aid funds. The original contract amount for this project was
$513,751.54.
Attached also for Council approval is the right-of-way and special assess-
ment agreement with CAPCO Inc. This agreement has been reviewed by Mr.
Pauly's office and approval is recommended.
CJJ:kh
Attachments.
2039
•
•
CONTRACT AMENDMENT ND. 4
TO CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 51-326
DELL ROAD
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
BATHER-RINGROSE-WOLSFELD-JARVIS-GARDNER,INC.
June 18, 1980 2B29 University Avenue Southeast
Minneapolis, Minnesota
•
The following work is to be added to the contract in accordance with the attached
schedule.
The contract amount is increased as follows:
• Additional Concrete Sidewalk $ 6,063.75
• Additional Bituminous Path $ 9,180.DO
• Increase in Contract Price Due to Contract Time
delay from 1979 to 1980 $48,205.35
•
• Additional Quantities Involved with Realignment
of Dell Road $43,549.90
It is further agreed that the contract completion date for the project shall be
extended from August 15, 1979 to November 15, 1980.
2090
1
i
t
It is mutually agreed that the Contractor will be paid for this work as itemized
above. All work shall be done in accordance with contract specifications or as
directed by the Engineer in the field.
It is understood that this agreement is not valid until it receives the approval
of the City of Eden Prairie and appropriate signatures are affixed.
CONTRACTOR: BROWN AND CRIS, INC.
By: ----
Title: fir-c/s-,,,'7'
Date: gt/rf-80 -_
ENGINEER: BATHER-RINGROSE-WOLSFELD-JARVIS-GARDNER, INC.
By: �_��
Title: / iy��G.c
Date: 7 eft..) (/
CITY: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By:
Title:
Date: -
File 21-7901
2091
AGPIIIIENf 1d•:CARDING SPECIAL,RSEEESME
This ayrcarent made this day of August, 1980, arena the City
Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal curporatian (the "City"), and Edina •
Building, Inc., a Minnesota oorporation ("Edina"), and Catuo, Inc., a
•
Minnesota corporation ("Caton"), (collectively called "the Owners").
RECITALS
A. Each of the owners is the owner in fee or as oentract vendee of a:x>::eon
of the real property (the"property") situated in the City of Edon
Prairie,
Prairie, Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described
in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and mode a part hereof. Mina is
dater of Parcel 1 and Catm is the owner of Parcel 2 described in
Exhibit "A."
B. The property currently is identified for purposes of ❑lecial asco's-
ments under WO tax identification numbers, 6-116-22-31-0002 and
6-116-22-42-0001.
C. The City has approved the construction of public iirprwumnts over
portions of the property described as: I.C. 51-326, street imiArovo,onts
on Dell Road ("improvements"), and a bid of$513,751.00 for eon :-:on
thereof has been accepted by Resolution number 7B-220. Two ch.unic, ,Acrs
have been added to the contract. The"improvements"are more fully described
on exhibit B attached hereto and trade a part hereof.
•
D. Assessments were levied in 1979 against parcels 1 and 2 for the tn•"••t i is
resulting frail the imprownents in the amount of $100,000.00 for,-.+.'h
parcel ("1979 assessments"). The 1979 assessirnts wnsti Lute liens
against cacti parcel in said principal amount, together with int,r .t•
and penalties with respect to certain portions thereof, crscernini which
the owners are delinquent in payment. •
•
E. The owners desire that the benefits to the property fr,m Ile into,,:;.•nfr;
be reassessed .ilainst the developable nortiona of said parcel* in the
amount of $200,000.00.
F. In addition to the 1979 assessments against the 1i9'rty, their ai e
other special assessments oenstituting liens against the prrl.•ety rs
follows:
Trunk, sewer and water levied in 1978 as to teeth p'''t`l'% AAA
lateral, sewer and water lee'irrl in 1973 as to parcel •
•
20R1/
G. There are currently two mechanic's liens (the "liens") filed against
the property described as:
a. Mechanic's Lien dated NovartS'r 6, 1979, filed Nova+iror 13, 1979,
as Document No. 1357131 (Torrens) as to Tract II in favor of
Consulting Engineers Diversified, Inc. List item of work
October 6, 1979; Total lien 511,639.22. Above lien was filed
as Document No. 4520795 with County Recorder as to Tract I.
b. Mechanic's Lien dated November 30, 1979, filed 0. anber 3, 1979,
as Coeunamt No. 1360536 (Torrens) as to Tract II in favor of Fr,••..''
Rove Associates, a partnership. Last item of work Noveyuer 30,
•
1979; Total lien 513,501.97. Above lien was filed as Hoerr nt
No. 4526384 with County Recorder as to Tract I.
AGREZMENTS
The parties hereto agree as follows:
1. A reassessment+in the sere of$200,000.00 against Parcels 1 and 2 shall be tented
.in the fall of 1980 and spread by the City for benefits to the oareels as
a result of the improvements.
2. The Owners specifically waive all rights under Minnesota Statutes
Section 429.081 or which they may otherwise have to challenge the
anoint or validity of the reassessments.
3. The Owners shall indemnify and hold harmless the City fran the lions
described and any other liens filed against the property.
Nothing in this section shall require the payment or discharge of the
liens by the Owners so long as Gaolers, upon first notifying City et
their intent to do so, shall in geed faith and at their own exl..-:-•e
contest the sane or the validity thereof by appropriate legal p:n,,..!tag,
•
• and shall furnish city with a teed or other security saticfactety to
• City securing the payment thereof, and City may p'nrtit the li.•n� .„n• _
tested to remain tvdischarged and unsatisfied during the pv+i..l..t
such contest and any appeal thereftart, unless City shall notify rho
Owners that, in the opinion of the City Attorney, by nnnp„ym•ro such items, the improvamnts will be materially endangered or.),y part
thereof, will be subject to loss or forfeiture, in which event -.r h
liens shall be paid promptly.
QQ-2-
zo3
4. City shall cancel pursuant to M.S.A. 429.071 Subd. 2 the"1979
assessments"including all principal, interest and penalty, on
the conditions that owners shall not have appealed said reas-
sessments made and levied pursuant to this agreement, or
commenced any other action to contest the validity thereof
prior to the expiration of the time for appeal thereof.
5. The owners grant to the City the right to enter onto the lands
of the owners to construct. the "improvements" and to do all
things reasonably necessary thereto.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By
Its Mayor
By
• Its Manager
EDINA BUILDING, INC.
•
By --
Its CATCO, INC.
By
•
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN 1
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _
day of August, 1980, by Wolfgang Fenzel, the Mayor, and R000r
Ulstad, the City Manager, of the City of Eden Prairie, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Publa-"c
2041 C., -3-
•
TRACT I
The Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 6, Township 115.
Range 22, Except that part described as follows: Oegirnenp .it a
point on the North line of said Southwest 1/4 distant 1270 feet
East of the Northwest corner thereof: thence Southerly at r:aht
angles a distance of 200 feet, said last described course beartr.-
South 0 degrees 33 minutes 45 seconds East: thence South 35 do::e
33 minutes 45 seconds Bast a distance of 73.24 feet; thence
10 degrees 23 minutes 07 seconds East a distance of 321.52 fee:
thence South 1 degree 56 minutes 35 seconds West a distance
of 270.23 feet: thence South 19 degrees 03 minutes 40 se:c:;ns
West a distance of 135.44 feet: thence South. 4 degrees 01 r:.:... .
22 seconds West a distance of 347.95 feet more or less to the
South line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4: thence
West along the South line thereof to the Southwest corner of •a:.:
Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4; thence North along the :feet
line thereof to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of t..c
Southwest 1/4: thence East along the North line thereof to the
point of beginning, and
Except that part described as follows: Cernencing at the Northeast
corner of Lot 1, Block 1, L0CE..1GU3;i: thence East along the E s:erl
extension of the North line of said Lot 1 a distance of 110 .feet:
thence South parallel with the last line of said Lot 1 a distance
of 200 feet; thence West 110 feet to the Southeast corner of -nat.'.
Lot 1; thence North along the East line of said Lot 1 to the
Northeast corner thereof.
ALSO: The South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of
Section 6, Township 116, Range 22.
ALSO: The Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4
of Section 6, Township 116, Range 22.
•
EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1
206)I
TRACT II
Par 1: That part of the South 4 of the Southwest Quarter of Fec"..on E.
Township 116, Range 22, lying East o5 a line drawn'free a point rr n
South line of the North ', of the Northwest Quarter of =ecttcn
116, Rance 22, eict•rt 1269 feet East from the Soutr: est corner
North 's of the Northwest Quarter to a point on the North line cf
y of the Southwest Quarter distant 1273.6 feet East from the nor:::: • . .__. ..
of said South 4 of the Southwest Quarter and North of the center':n,
Road running in a Northwesterly and Southeasterly direction thrv_ -
property except that part thereof lying within _S' llhur.st ?.:'.di.irn
except that part thereof embraced with in Registered Lane Survey ':..
according to the Government Survey thereof.
Par 2: That part of the Westerly '! of the Southwest '° of the Sec:
Quarter lying North of the Northerly lire of the plat of Sellhu:-s7 '_-
in Southeast Quarter, Section 6, Township 116. Range 22, actor:i:n•
Government Survey thereof.
Par 3• The Northwest Quarter of the Southeast ('carter, _ecci_n ..
116, Ranee 22. acccrdinn to the Government Survey '.._-_of.
Par 4: Tract 3, Registed Land Survey No. 133a, Filet of Recii::i- :.
Titles, County of Hennepin.
•
•
EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2
•
•
•
209Ic
MEMO
E
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: August 14, 1980 g.
SUBJECT: Purchase Agreement for Sale of City
Property on T.H. 169
R.L.S. #423
During 1975, at the time that T.H. 169 was widened from I-494 past the
Eden Prairie Center to south of Schooner Boulevard, the City became
involved in right-of-way acquisition and purchased a house and three
parcels described as Tracts A, B and C, R.L.S. #423. The original
areas of these parcels was 1.I3 acres. The house was then removed and
the required right-of-way for the T.H. 169 widening was assigned to
MN/DOT, leaving .9 acres remaining in'Ccty ownership. The property
has right in/right out access only from T.H. 169.
Recently, the Tudor Oaks Condominium Project Partnership, which is the
new developer of the Tudor Oaks Project, requested that the City consider
the sale of said Tracts A, B and C, so that they could incorporate these
tracts into their overall 'development plans. Mr. John O'Neill, the owner
of property abutting Said tracts to the south, also expressed an interest
in purchasing the City's properties.
After conferring with City Attorney Roger Pauly, it was determined that it
would be in the best interests of good land planning in the area to limit
bidding to the adjacent property owners, rather than allowing this small
property to be sold and developed separately. Accordingly, invitations
to submit sealed bids at 1:30 P.M. on July 30, 1980, were mailed out to
both the Tudor Oaks Partnership and to Mr. O'Neill. •
Pursuant to said invitation for bids, the Tudor Oaks Partnership submitted
a bid of $64,034. Mr. O'Neill chose not to submit a bid. The offer contains
certain contingencies as described on the attached purchase agreement. An
appraisal of said property done by Cambell Appraisal Co. for the City on
February 20, 1976, indicated an estimated value of $64,000. The Tudor Oaks
Partnership has submitted a preliminary site plan (copy attached) showing
how the City's property would be utilized, including three parcels of the
O'Neill property to the south.
Recommend approval of said purchase agreement with Tudor Oaks Condominium
Partnership for sale of Tracts A, B and C of R.L.S. #423.
CJJ:KH
Attachments
2092
.
11, /�' I g
�i� ✓ I
jr�•�.
%r a >� a
r— ! .. 11 .� a •`_, - ---_,, cc::: ...7)•\ • ,.:,_''';',,,...i...1 .--:.<i)----•7.,•:;-• '..: •:-;-..- ,,,...,r,
\'''' \\--
•
iii
•` '- 1 _
r: .; 91,* ki-.. -. .. ., •
/ ... ...
....._____
0 4F< .y. f 1�,,,1� r .,,..-).ILL
Q'NE I LL 7',� ``, \\j
0 I '^ y -- i� �,�.- ( • =�: .,\\ 7 /' : � 1
f/ `f�1txl71t+u
49.03 acres0141t. - ,
•
.
1788
, i\,(-42--T H :.N114,411/4 04
N.
7 ur;'s per acre . .,
t.
441a
2095 .
gg•
rla.l.,ra .nm,r•,+oar 1d,
I'I\1(—..soot•near..,
" """'+""' PURL} SE AGREEMENT
/ i •
Eden Prairie so
I ABIO HOLDINGS (MINN.) INC., general partner Tudor Oaks Condominium
l RECEIVED OF Project, a limited partnership (the Buyer')
theaum of One Thousand and No/100 ($1,000,00 , DOIJ+Ri
Icheck as earnest money and in raft payment for the purchase of property aN
1 tense,,«a both of.a tam...m....n --d,.,.%iv Sfl,ated In the
lying North 8440 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie
•
County of Hennepin ,Stale of Minnesota,and legally Jen:tibed as iolluwv,to-wn-
) Tracts A. B and C.R.L.S. No. 423 •
•
including all garden bulbs.plants.shrubs and trees,all storm sash.storm doors,detachable vesbuir.as moo,
nm), •
shades,blinds I I el Ji fl1u blinds,.curtain("di.era es d. dupery ends.lighting . .
•
• fixrurts,hot NATI Lanka and heatin.rum math any.rumors [Anat.stoker and other rglupmrnt as.) "r'c.
with),Palcr softener and eliapddecas tank i and
I a the pr„m o'us wilt!).
end p piano,
equipment.e nla,l.t,..,...,rand
scar,l+udoan di+hwa.her, ar disposal. top shoes and s,
•
f located on said premises and including also the following personal property:
•
• all of whirl,prorctty the undersigned has this day sold to the buyer for the sum of: 64 Q34.00
•
Sixty-four Thousand Thirty-four and No/100 (; , 1x1l.tARS.
I which the buyer agrees to pay in the lnllowing manner: r befor
Earnesi mp,ey herein paid$
1,000.00 a U i 63,034.00 ,c,sh,on/January before
, 1980 ,l,e..,a,,. .,,h,,,,g
1
I This Agreement is contingent upon the following: (1) Buyer securing approval from
the City Council of Eden Prairie for Buyer's site plan for a Planned Unit
Oevelopment by December 31, 1980; and (2) The closing of the sales to Buyer of
•
, t the parcels labeled 1 and 2 on the attached Exhibit A. •
•
I If any of the contingencies are not removed within the allotted time, this
•
,,I• moneyment paidshall hereinecome shallnbel and returneddintitse option of entirety by8ther and Seller. earnest
{ i ---SEE ADDENDUM ATTACHED WHICH IS PART OF THIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT---
! she o sellercK ie sod del W',e.nly Da.l
l Subject n performance)in byl wW tole nI.id premise,subwef only to the Iullu.ine...Whet
(to be
pruned
ndr sr•n+ 1 any, ' e.and trderel re slat.a
I () oritoms rtlanne t Juse or ement ul rremien without nlrettee barman.proriwa. -
1 (tilb)Remts ii,in 1 any turn,).,,r n:,ne..1 nehtt in the State,.)a,nKn.u,
•
L (1R
j (a)Urns,nJdnm,a nnne-, .our,ll o.mxmn nt lewcetoRaI4•n,,mptlwmemf
•
kh 1 tenant.as r the r L ai,'.e"p1 in I1t teas l`Y 6)'" n.l,nr ryd installments W arwaul a+u,+ dh
1 ( 1 R Thtct Sellhall pay the rnl e,Jan in the19 81 nil)be non •. "�"'
1 sod lhetelttr.Selkr wanann Ow 1 a seat •
•
,lull,penal or noo h,nmueal—tint.h h
•
Neither the -hit nor the seller's agent make any ter nenuc.n or warrant whena,er<omelet.the want,a e s,,out,nr,
which ahall be sswn,ed araintr the.ninny,ub+ryucnt ro the due sal Poona..
Seller tnacoana that bu,hl,ne..d ant,ate ennelr.thin the boundary lines at ill,pnywny and acmes o,um....,,h I.+,,,rl.yana
not included Iwuin and all debt.n,m one prem.,.pr.,tit{,nu•a1011 Joe.NLI.1'R W AKRA`:TAl I A1.1.11.1N I11 I\I, SIR
ICONDITla5 AND I'
WIRING A\ Ll.'M D llING UNIX)AND LIx A1.1D SAID gRLMHN S AlitPitt+1.1R W A ,k DI h
AT DAll 01 CLOSING. date of closing d,1 ,rho.
The feller blether sc, to blarer ss,tenvn me later than( sgreemens heat been contorted wish.I:nlc.,unuretse dwelled rho.sale doll be crows.m ur betl or any Wert-awe le,,,nte.J..:rr.n Ow dare..,n,a1,m.1,.,,
e
mile event rho, the pe n Jest-roved op.or w,lilfllln,e,paid
Ihel,nkr'hail he teruMlcJ to hi and,nr.err ,n,. ,,,•a•,., n
bKmae'The
sayer and1.Al the pu,11101i f„ tai and r tint K ry
I The borer and w'Irr Au,n tulle 11 tat Pen,,,ad,uamate IIi1r`c rosin n
• I inv..penuche,nsMI',Ywnant ts,.1„r..then be made a,, 9 ` 1 A
Tsen err than, u'II I .,
( within a e manic It ,men^,l 1 1 deed
The
w i n Jan mervot',to,''Arne
c h. P d
I -hung 10 ee1"'oar nt v.,Inn I ,"n w.UM Inl I L '_;J,1 ' ..,. ,, '.
„d,•. „1.• .i1 If I. nu,*die 1 III- 1
tieing
g' of the n•Att rl.hil lob I I 1 111 . I•, t
.. to�tlw hula.the Nit,.,ball l.r I .. ,,,
n a ter aM1wish.M II 1 she I
.Iny bill.I scud `1•Innll an.l. r,hr 1,1.1.1..111,t.. nlu , 1 null a habit .In- •. . ...I",.
eerier r tII.'r I 1 d 11 111, a 1'en.rrlr rw 1, ,
sal aAll nd 11 'I I' ' col, t ' a 1 ' oYr In ne tlm a rvri du 111a •'•.
! ,OM Is 'r t•Ine':. M r',
shxe,rrl a . I I r wok,,toth..n+ I I �. .n
lilt'• tint env o h oils,
_ ...enroll,) rlo,is undrsa.•1 and a„ ,1'1h,e I I . 1 r, - '
his,..n•fe.•Ianda,:.11,4'den Ihi..aa 1.made sal•n„n r.,VnIl.al In,rat.,twn or rwn11rtheea,,.,, _,.I,a,,,-,r
, loft 1 r ,.,n,, r
d'ml iron,.,n m1 minter t1.d.ir„r.r,,..n.,idr,+,a..,wn,,n m),.,,,•n veto esm,.+row a
a+I,,,,4ltw
4'
• The delivery d JI.pen and maws shall be male at the drat al: - ,
( ... ✓ TUDOR o!li,K _(�l,m l It: I'R0J4iT^ -
I,the umkeie ed.owner of the ab,Ye IaeJ,du hereby approve 'h I•Il v AbSlr c'Hi 1rC1'►'I1hih i'n't --'�
she abuK agreement and the we lwtebr male. upon thiV 1U10,Alaloetoa.is;l,a..•v.10.1.:4),a;,,Inr.
' ...._............................... _.........»..........._...(SEALI W6.A.�ls`�•+�4aa`��"'�'� LSCAII
/s _..k1kr ..._............President onset
�s 40 General, Partner ISSAl1 '
-uJ"a_l L 1 .ISEALI .................. *se
,, _
Selkr
•
ADDENDUM TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT
The undersigned parties to a Purchase Agreement dated
alIV Iti , 1980, on property known as Tracts A, B and C,
' R.L.S. No. 423, lying North of 8440 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, hereby mutually agree to amend said contract as follows:
1. The Buyer reserves the right to extend the contingency
time period by ninety (90) days.
2. Seller is to provide Buyer with Title Insurance Binder
for above-described property.
3. The Buyer agrees to assume all Special Assessments now
due and owing or pending at the time of closing.
4. All other conditions of the Purchase Agreement to remain
the same.
DATED:
TUDOR OAKS CONDOMINIUM PROJECT SELLER:
BUYER: a Limited partnership
:'AIIIO Holdings (Minnesota) , Inc.
`
4 40 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
President
General Partner
DATED:
209l e
.„ •f uot••� _ r,/ T
no 1 ? 7 .w,'t a �SCOMMERCiAL IE n, ;��b�. "
THE . PRESERVE:; a•.,. ,,� ,� '1
( ' +0 J IJ`,►1 . {I t. SIM <0, JlF 4,c,.x, ( /0V f 4 •iJ/ •'•�'!,y` ,2•¢SI :::
:t0CA` /S47
14
r,, d` • 1, ', 1
• : • `I C
p NORTH J ;;
' 1
�u�, ARK• r �: C
Io J, 4•• .. ` i N j .11
. •1 ' OL 4,.•• '.•'..',•' t '' I \i.;\..s .
1. 1i-11 22.13.000@ [pm&fi-116-22-bl:0002 , 'a .
A " I y�
o 47°/
i ; . ; 4;•• - .,,, nn, 1
7fl1 4 e nid . / y° c,' .. (r
_1•• E••r►� E-
. - c e 0 '..
r dC)I I•^fie :�,L'y .,;: ,,r.••r •`
I 1 p i 4 ' ,/-' ,.41 7 .
f ` ` .
'''A 'YO fs `rl►:Z/° �a r. C Y iTRACT A
/ h /g .,.4Y�. 5J s _
t� !t,
/40 y °* ` `x1l►CI 1 y f.►► O wCC
_ !ems,
�e : ,v•• `- TRACT LI—N f —7�.r.—�_
• % ' err•. 4'i _ C9 f -2
•
1; \.4.p -• \ " c• ''' o :4.
4.
h •
(
.�
�r,tl. —•71,717 CS 1174...
I,NA:1 J11
la /• of ,
• 2062 te(117;"6.1467'144!i:IM Oil•G,.0 01 IN•0.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
August 19, 1980
PLUMBING
Bob's Plumbing & Heating Inc.
Ken Boutin Plumbing
Doc's Plumbing
CONTRACTORS (I & 2 FAMILY)
Grommesch Construction Co.
Nilsen-Erickson Inc.
The St. Dennis Co.
Woodsman Builders of Minnesota
PRIVATE KENNEL LICENSE
E. J. Renier
These licenses have been approved by the department head responsible for
the licensed activity.
na w7 plate
Cindy M.'fllante, Licensing Clerk f.
zo9 y
TO: Mr. Ulstad
FROM: Cindy Plante
DATE: July 28, 1980
RE: Mr. Renier's Kennel License
This is the list of residents I will notify on August 5, 1980, regarding
Mr. Renier's Kennel license. It will appear on the August 19, 1980
City Council Agenda. I have also attached a copy of the letter I am
sending out to the residents.
Carl S. Nelson
13945 Holly Road
Eugene J. Karulf
13905 Holly Road
Lawrence B. Ruegemer
13855 Holly Road
M. C. Belden
6927 Rosemary Road
Robert W. Hanson
6923 Rosemary Road
2O9
"Confidential Report for Council"
July 17, 1980
TO: Cindy Plante 4
FROM: CSO Pauline OlsonFO
SUBJECT: Private Kennel License Investigation of 13895 Holly Road
The dwelling is a private home in a residential area. In checking with
the City Assessor's office, the lot was found to have 109.93 feet in
front, 109 feet in back, 212.3 feet on the east side, and the west side
has 198 feet. According to the applicant, he plans to keep only three
dogs and has no intention of raising dogs.
I stopped by the applicant's home on a couple of occasions and drove by
several times. The first time I stopped, I observed a black Lab on the
applicant's property. Shortly thereafter, the Lab headed up Holly Road,
unaccompanied by a person having control over the dog. The Lab did
return home as soon as I got out of the car and approached the
applicant's home. Mr. Ranier was not home, however, his son was
advised of the City Ordinance governing dogs at large. Mr. Renier's
son stated that he was aware of the ordinance and that the Lab usually
stays home as it is very old. Mr. Ranier is, at the present time,
constructing a fence around his back yard which he hopes will keep his
�- dog in the yard. However, there appears to be a problem with a ravine
on the east side of the house which is caused by the hosing down of the
kennel. Some of the neighbors advised that the water flows onto Mr.
Penier's neighbor's nroaerty, builds up, and has killed of
grass. I heard on .,o,•k during tie time I was c. ckir, e
water flow. The barking stopped as soon as I left.
The neighbors' comments are as follows: •
"Their dogs run loose. I have had to chase the one dog home because it
r,as after one of my kids. I know also of a problem with Mr. Renier
cleaning his kennel and it runs down onto his neighbor's property."
"The dogs bark and run. It doesn't matter what time of day."
• "They don't take care of their dogs or the property."
"They must keep their dogs in a kennel now because we never see them."
"Their dogs do run and bark a lot. It is nice, though, to have that
type of protection at night. I would also have to say that other dogs
run more than theirs."
"410 problem with their barking and running. Usually someone is out
with the dogs when they let them run."
"Confidential Report for Council"
Cindy Plante
July 17, 1980
Page 2
"Nothing against their having a license as we do not have enough
problems for a sufficient complaint."
"Definitely not; their dogs bark at all hours of the night and they
do not take good care of the dogs or property."
"That's fine if they have a kennel license. I enjoy their dogs. They
keep good care of them. I would hate, though, to see them raise dogs." •
•
(They have in the past).
"Confidential Report for Council"
•
{ II
July 28, 1980
TO: Cindy Plante
FROM: CSO Pauline Olson S
SUBJECT: Follow up to a Private Kennel Investigation of 13895 Holly Road
The problem with the ravine may be a serious one, regarding the
application. The neighbors that have their property next to the
Reiners are against the kennel license. I would like to make a
note that I first found out about the ravine problem from neighbors
other than the ones effected by the ravine.
20 9.31
•
r.=✓ t_s
CIS Y OFFICES/8950 EOEN PRAIRIE ROAD/EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55344/TELEPHOCE(612193T-2252 `„�;�„1 /' "
•
•
•
•
August 11, 1980
•
Mr. E. J. Renier
13895 Holly Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
•
Dear Mr. Renier:
This is to notify you that the application you made for a Kennel license
is going to appear before the City Council. If•you wish to represent
yourself in the event that any questions may arise, please feel free to
attend the meeting on August 19, 1980 at 7:30 P.M.
Sincerely,
Cindy M. Plante
Licensing Clerk
•
•
•
•
•
2099