HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 06/17/1980 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESbAY, JUNE 17, 1980 7:30 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL. MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Dean Edstrom,
n _ Dave Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and
Paul Redpath
COUNCIL STAFF: / 1 City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney
I Roger Pauly; Planning Director Chris
Enger; Finance Director John Frane;
Director of Community Services Bob
Lambert; City Engineer Carl Jullie; and
Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary
INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
A. Social City Council Meeting held May 27, 1980 Page 1542
B. Board of Review Minutes from meetings held May 27 and June 10, 1980 Page 1545 '
C. City Council meeting held Tuesday, June 3, 1980 Page 1547
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Request to set a Public Hearing for Anderson Lakes Parkway Neighborhood Page 1557 '
Shopping Center for Jull_15, 1980
B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 80-12, rezoning 3 acres from Rural to Page 1558
Office for American Family Insurance Phase 2 Building by Rauenhorst
and developer's agreement
C. Approval of N.S.P. substation developer's agreement Page 1560
D. Mn/DOT ri-ght-of-way acquisition offer for T.H. 169_permanent signal Page 1594
pLoject at Co. Rd. 1, I.C. 51-311
E.. Receive petition and orderfeasibility report for improvements on Hilltop page 1597
Road, I.C. 51-380 (Resolution No. 80-117)
F.. Receive petition and order feasibility report for sewer and water Page 1602
extension on Fl thg_Cloud Drive and Willow Creek Road, I.C. 51-382
(Resolution No. 80-118j
IV, PUBLIC HEARINGS
runs Fashions, inc. by Rauenhorst Corporation. Request to rezone from Page I467
Rit•al to 1-2 and preliminary_plat 9.95 acres into 1 lot and 1 outlot. & 1607
Located north of Valley View Road across from 9955 V View Road
(Ordinance No. 80-13 and Resolution No. 130-98)/ tine rom 6/3/80
( 8 Public Herring for street and pathway construvti/on on Anders n Lakes Page 1608
Vr a Om y from rrese --
.lrvar�tc � H. 'r69 � C. ;;;- ---
) (7te olutton No.
V. f'A`'N:i';T OF CLAIMS NOS. 1560 - 2097 -- .
- - _ —.............. -- Pagr. 1609
VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COhIPIISSIi1NS
•
•
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,June 17, 1980
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Bryant Lake View Estates - Replat of preliminary plat by Thelma Haynes. Page 1615
Request o preliminary plat 17 of the 23 acres of the previous preliminary
plat for 1 existing home and 5 new lots for single family construction.
Locacted along the northwest corner of Bryant Lake adjacent to Beach
Road. (Resolution No. 80-115)
VIII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
1\�, A., /nd Reading of Ordinance No. 80-03, rezoning approximately 111 acres from Page 1624
ural to R1-13.5 for Olympic Hills 6th Addition by The Preserve and
0 m is Hills Corporation, and developer's agreement
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
•
1. Appointment of 5 members to the Housing & Redevelopment Authority
2. Ao)
ppointment of 1 member to the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Page 1625
Commission to fill an unexpired term to 2/28/81
Y3. Appointment of 1 member to the Historical & Cultural Commission to Page 1626
r-• fill an unexpired term to 2/28/83
4. Appointment of 1 citizen member to the Citizens Advisory Group Page 1628
( (CAT
B. Report of City Attorney
C. Resort of City Manager
D. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Receive and award bids for tennis courts at Round Lake Park and Prairie Page 1630
East Neighborhood Park and multi-use court at Topview Neighborhood
Park
2. Receive and award bids for the porch at the Senior Citizen Center Page 1631
3. Creekwood Park Acquisition and Development Plan Page 1632
g
4. Lake Eden Park Plan Page 1637
5. Round Lake Park Picnic Shelter/Warming House Program Page 1640
E. Report of City Engineer
/1. Consider bids for improvement in Norseman Industrial Park 4th Page 1643
Addition,_I C 51-3E9 (Resolution No. 80-119 1
F. Report of finance Director
1. Recbiest to set Public Hearing for Municipal Industrial Development 'are 1646
13on val d_appro in the amount of T2,300,000.00 for Braun-Kaiser
Company for July l5, l9£30
X. NEW BUSINESS
• „, At)MI n ueeren -
•
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
27 May, 1980
( COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Wolfgang Penzel, David Osterholt, Sidney Pauly,
Dean Edstrem, Paul Redpath
OTHERS PRESENT: Gerry Wigen, Community Center Committee
Dick Anderson, Community Center Committee
Bob Johnson, Parks Commission
Lyle Shaw, School Board and Community Center
Committee
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
Mr. Penzel called the meeting to order at 9:35 P.M. He stated that the purpose
of this meeting is to review the Design Development Phase of the Community
Center. No details would be discussed at this time, only basic review of
the design and budget, so the architect can proceed with the next phase of
working drawings if approval of design development is accomplished tonight.
Mr. Smiley, representing Smiley Clatter Architects,cs introducedthis sustaff
present at this meeting: Gary Nyberg, project
project manager; Joe Doleis, project engineer.
Architect's Design Review — Gary Nyberg
Nyberg presented the design. He said the site study is unchanged from the
last review. He reviewed the drawings pointing out certain specifics:
200 folding seats in the pool area, and 1218 folding seats in the hockey
arena. 4 team rooms, two of which include locked storage areas.
He stated a figure skating club room (north end of rink) was added as an
alternate. It includes a viewing window, spaces for desk and sound system
and 2 locker areas for men and women.
Nyberg pointed out that the second floor (situated over part of the downstairs
lobby, office, team rooms and alternate handball courts) is designed to have }{
an elevator opening to an open lounge area (30' x 40'). The lounge area has
a window for viewing the ice arena. There is another room on this level
(possible exercise/weight room), stairs, and a mechanical room.
Nyberg said there is a sloped"Kalwal.l" skylight so one can see up to the
upper lounge from the main level entry area. There is another "Kalwall"
panel (vertical) used in the pool area. He pointed out that these skylights
•
provide a good source of natural lighting as well as give good identity to
the structure.
•
Nyberg showed how the building is designed into 4 different height zones:
1.
1. hockey arena is the highest
2. swimming and handball areas make the next lower zone with skylights
as a link
3. zamboni and mechanical rooms, next lower
4. main entry and locker rooms, lowest zone.
EDFN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL N:h :2LNG -2- 27 May, 1980
(
These height zones can be set off in different exterior colors to give interest.
Penzel asked if there was a running track in the hockey area. Nyberg said if
the first 2 rows of seating were removed this area could be used as an informal
track.
Penzel asked why the external window to the concession area was removed. Nyberg
said they were trying to minimize door and windows for the sake of vandalism.
Also, pool activity will probably keep the building open when the playing
fields are in use, thus inside access to the concession area should not be
a problem.
Nyberg said the exterior would mostly be painted textured block and plain
block walls will be used inside. The inside walls would be treated with a
spray for acooustical purposes in crucial areas.
Mechanical Review -Joe Doleis
Doleis stated that metal halide light fixtures, mounted flush to joists (25'
from ice) will be used in the hookey arena, with fiourescent lighting over
the spectator area.
Diffusors will be used over the pool area with flourescent lighting over
the spectator area.
Flourescent lighting will be used throughout the rest of the building.
The hockey area will be heated just enough to keep the outside wall pipes
from freezing. The ground under the rink will also be heated.
An underground air duct is designed around the pool area.
Doleis estimated the heat recovery in this building will be about 701:, which
will be used mainly in the pool area and locker rooms.
Doleis said a couple of small individual ventilation units will be put in the
meeting rooms and one unit in the raquetball area.
Costs -1•;as Matsumoto
Matsumoto explained that in the design development phase they have tried to
keep all the things the program asked for and still give a quality building.
The main building cost (swimming pool/ice arena per
design development drawini:,$) is estimated at $2,475,783.00
(Includes architect's fee, inflation cushion, etc.)
{
Add alternates are as follows:
1. R1 -Exterior concrete deck and wading
pool 35,000.00
EDNN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL NESTING -3- 27 May, 1980
2. R2 - Raoquetball/handball/oommunity
rooms 300,000.00
3. R3 - Figure Skating Room 18,000.00 $353,000.000
NATION: Redpath moved that the architect's proceed per letter of
Nay 27, 1980, and design and bid the following deduct alternates as
well:
3. Unfinished 2nd Floor space 8,900.00
4. Arena bleachers - omit 1000 seats
figures 81,600.00
5. Pool bleachers - omit 235 seats
figured 14,000.00
9. Lockers and benches in pool area
reduce to 50 in lieu of 100 7,500.00
10. Omit dasher boards, boxes, etc.
(option - purchase used) 55,000.00
12. Omit ice rink equipment & piping
(option - possibly lease purchases) 200,000.00 $ 367,000.00
Edstrom seoonded the motion and it passed unanimously.
DISCUSSION: **It was recommended that Item Dl, Site Lighting ($15,000.00) be
added as an alternate.
Doleis said the water servioe for this building will require 2 fire hydrants.
The closest water now is 600' away at the high school. He suggests that rather
than take water from the school, a line be run along Valley View Road. Penzel
said this could be worked out as long as it is planned for before the road
goes in.
Rr. Smiley voiced some concern that as the Council approves this plan and
asks the architects to proceed with the design and bid of alternates as well
us the main building plans, it might be difficult to stay within the bond
issue budget. Smiley felt the Council should be aware of this concern.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Carrie Tietz
Recording Secretary (substitute)
•
MINUTES
BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING
Tuesday, May 27, 1980 7:30 P.M. City Hall
Pledge of Allegiance
Board of Review members: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Sidney Pauly, David Osterholt, Paul
Redpath, Dean Edstrom
Board of Review City Staff: City Manager Roger Ulstad, City Assessor Bob Martz, Steve
Sinell, Appraiser, Lorna Thomas, Appraiser, Tom O'Brien Appraiser, Hennepin County
Representative Kerman Benson. 6�
Roll Call: All members present
The Board of Review was called to order by Mayor Penzel at 7:30 P.M. The following
property owners appeared and were heard by the Board of Review:
1. Allen Paloranta, 6695 W. 175th Ave.
2. Douglas Page, 15817 Valley View Road
3. William Quirk, 1430E Charing Cross
4. Emil Johnson, 8730 Summit Drive
5. Leland Kottke, 9190 Mitchell Road
6. Fred Curtis, 6500 Kurtz Lane
7. Cecil Martin, 6585 Eden Prairie Road
B. Sandra Albert, 15480 Edgewood Court
9. Douglas Babcock, 15009 Hillside Drive
10. Douglas Lehman, 6882 Ticonderoga Trail
11. James Rannow, 16316 Lincoln Lane
12. Mike Thurston, 15281 Creekside Drive
13. Edwin Norberg, 1686E Flying Cloud Drive
MOTION: Osterholt moved seconded by Redpath to reconvene the Board of Review meeting
on Tuesday, June 10, 1980 at 7:00 P.M., pending the City Assessor reviewing the above
listed properties. Motion carried unanimously.
MINUTES
BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING
7.00 P.M. Tuesday, June 10, 1980
( itinuation of Board of Review Meeting of May 27, 1980)
Board of Review Members Present: Sidney Pauly (acting Chairman for Wolfgang Penzel), David
Osterholt, Paul Redpath, Dean Edstrom
Board of Review Members Absent: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel
Board of Review Staff Present: Roger Ulstad City Manager, Bob Martz City Assessor, Hennepin
County Representative Kerman Benson.
City Assessor Bob Martz gave a report on the disposition of items 1 - 13 of the May 27, 1980
meeting and as a result of the review the following property owners requested additional
condideration of their value:
1. Douglas Page, 15817 Valley View Road, reduction of value to $79,800
2. William Quirk, 14308 Charing Cross, reduction of value to $83,000
3. Leland Kottke, 9190 Mitchell Road, reduction of value to $72,000
4. Francis Anderson, 17249 Valley Road, reduction of value to $98,300 (Did not
appear at 5/27/80 meeting.)
City Assessor Martz recommended that resolution RBO-113 be adopted, directing the Board
of Review to accept the 1980 assessment with valuation changes as noted.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, the motion to adopt Resolution R80-113 as
recommended by City Assessor Martz. The motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to adjourn the 1980 Board of Review at 8:00
P.M. Motion carried unanimiously.
3
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
fUESDAY, JUNE 3, 1980 7:30 PM, CITY HALL
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Dean Edstrom, Dave
Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and Paul Redpath
COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney
Roger Pauly; Planning Director Chris Enger;
Finance Director John Frane; Director of
Community Services Bob Lambert; City
Engineer Carl Jullie; and Joyce Provo,
Recording Secretary
INVOCATION: City Manager Roger K. Ulstad
FLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Edstrom, Osterholt Pauly and Redpath present; Penzel absent, (Edstrom excused
from the meeting at 10:00 PM)
In the absence of Mayor Penzel, the meeting was conducted by Acting Mayor Sidney Pauly,
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
Item VII. E. 2, Extend bid opening date for Valley View Road/Dell Road, Phase
2, I.C. 51-325 was added to the Consent Calendar.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the agenda as amended
and published. Motion carried unanimously.
II. MINUTES O.F THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, MAY 20, 1980
Pg. 3, 1st para,, last line, strike "sustain itself" and insert in lieu thereof
"be self-sustaining"; Pg. 7, 2nd para., 2nd line, strike "aye" and insert in lieu
thereof "nay"; and on Pg; 10, last para., 2nd line, strike "West of County Road
4 to County Road 1" and insert in lieu thereof "to County Road 4".
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the minutes of the Council
meeting held Tuesday, May 20, 198D, as amended and published. Motion carried
unanimously.
III. CONSENT CALENOAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Resolution regarding funding for County Road 4 Bikeway project (Resolution
No. 80-108)
C. Resolution for appropriation of MSA funds to T.N. 5/W.78th Street signal
project, I.C. 51-327 (Resolution No. 80-109)
D. Approval of final agreement with Hennepin County for traffic si1cna project
7841, I.C. 51 338, Co. Rd. 18 at Anderson lakes Parkway (Resolution No.
80-110) — -
E. Amend Resolution No. 1210 relating to deferment of special assessments
1'or .Senior Citizens Resolution No30=117)
A
City Council Minutes - 2 - Tues.,June 3, 1980
F. Final a pproval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of
287,250.00 for Alston and Jean Lundgren (Resolution No. 80-10W
{ G. Final ap_rovai for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of
$ 6,000,000.00 for the Minnesota Vikings Facility (Resolution No. 80-103)
H. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 80-10s rezoning 22 acres from Rural to R1-13.5
for Rymarland Camp2nd Addition by Milt Quam and developer's agreement
I. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 80-11, rezoning 8 acres from Rural to Office for
Cardarelle & Associates, Inc., and developer's agreement
J. Resolution No. 80-105, requesting approval for transferring of $10,000 from
Community Development Block Grant County Road 4 bike trail to Valley View
Road bike trail
K. Resolution No. 80-104, requesting the release of 1980 LAWCON funds and to
restore 1981 LAWCON funding level
L. Extend bid opening date for Valley View Road/Dell Road, Phase 2, I.C. 51-325
formerly item VII. E. 2.)
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to approve items A - L on the Consent
Calendar. Motion carried unanimously.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Braun's Fashions, Inc. by Rauenhorst Corporation_ Request to rezone from Rural
to I-2 and preliminary plat 9.95 acres into 1 lot and 1 outlot. Located north
of Valley View Road across from 9955 Valley View Road (Ordinance No. 8D-13 and
Resolution No. 80-98)
Bob Worthington, Rauenhorst Corporation, representing the proponents, spoke to the
proposal and showed graphics depicting same. Worthington added that this
project will supersede the Briarfield Estates proposal.
Planning Director Enger explained this item was considered at the April 14 and
April 28, 1980 Planning Commission meetings. The Commission recommended
approval of the proposal to the Council on a 5 0 vote with 1 "abstention",
subject to the Staff Report dated April 11, 1980.
Director of Community Services Lambert reported the Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission reviewed this proposal on May 19th and the Commission
recommended denial to the Council on a 6 - 1 vote. Lambert added the majority
of the discussion centered around the hill that is being cut about 50 feet
between the LeParc property and the building. Six members of the Commission
were upset with what the development looks like to the north and felt that
by removing the hill the whole gravel pit is opened up to what is supposedly
going to be residential to the south. The Commission felt this was a good place
to make a stand as far as stopping the leveling. If a proposal could be
developed that could maintain the hill it is acceptable, but with the hill coming
down they were opposed to it.
Pauly asked if Mr. Enger recalled how the cut and fill was proposed on Briarfield
Estates compared to the cut and fill on this proposal. Enger explained
the Briarfield Estates proposal was for a preliminary plat and rezoning of the
western portion of this property for duplexes. The proposal on this site
is for concept approval for apartment complexes and a restaurant. Although a
grading plan was not prepared for Briarfield Estates, their proposal would have
City Council Minutes - 3 - Tues.,June 3, 1980
A. Braun's Fashions, Inc. by Rauenhorst Corporation (continued)
required a substantial cut on that site as well. The hill is 50 feet high
and some uses could perhaps cut 20 feet, others 30 feet, etc. Braun's has
responded to the concern about leaving the hill which is largely unvegetated.
Once the hill is gone it opens up the entire industrial park to view and that
is why they have provided in their grading an interruption in the sight line
up near Valley View Road so that it wouldn't be opened up to the entire
industrial park. The proponents have tried to replace the sight line
interruption where the hill was, with interruptions consisting of berms and
landscaping.
Osterholt questioned when we get into the grading of Valley View Road (County
Road 39) on the final phase, will there be County participation on that?
City Engineer Jullie replied he would hope so, however, the County has said they
don't have any funds and they don't have it in their five-year capital
improvement program. Right now the City's State Aid Funds are programmed for
several other projects and the County has reviewed the access points and find
that the sight distances are okay and the road structure is sufficient to handle
additional traffic. Jullie added it surely would be better to have the grade
lowered at this time but there is just not the wherewithal to do it.
Discussion took place regarding outside storage, and Osterholt asked if the
proponents know outside storage is not permitted on this property. Worthington
acknowledged they do understand they cannot have outside storage on the
property.
Osterholt asked if Braun's intends to ask for MIDB's. Worthington replied in the
affirmative.
Pauly questioned how firm the planned residential is for the remainder of the
parcel. Worthington replied the entire parcel is going to be owned by Braun's.
They, in turn, once this development has taken place will be brokering the
balance of the property to a residential developer.
Pauly further asked how logical it is to put in a residential development which
is pretty much surrounded by industrial. Worthington responded he felt that is
a policy that should be made by the City. If the Planning Commission and City
Council after studying this feel it should be something else, that is fine, but
it should be initiated by the City and not by Braun's.
City Planner Enger added both the Smetana Lake Sector Study, the 1968
Comprehensive Guide Plan and the 1979 Comprehensive Guide Plan all illustrate
industrial or high density residential for this general area.
Jay Peterson, 11179 Windrow Drive, asked if Braun's is going to have a rear
access for the semis for sure. Worthington explained they have been in contact
with the owners of the LeParc property and they have consented to an access.
Worthington added if there is a choice they prefer to go with sanding of the
road first, as opposed to being forced to go through the LeParc development
even though the consent is granted. In the long run there may be some legal
issues that may, even though they have good intentions, create some problems
as to who is going to be responsible for upkeep and maintenance, liability, etc.
Osterholt added he has problems relying on private enterprise to sand the road.
Mr. Peterson felt another access is necessary because if a truck gets stuck
it is impossible to pass on the hill.
Pauly asked if the Council were to approve this proposal with the Valley View
Road option allowing Braun's to sand it, can the City enforce that in a
developer's agreement? /ALL)
City Council Minutes - 4 - Tues.,June 3, 1980
A. Braun's f.a hipns,Inc, by Rauenhorst Corporation (continued)
City Attorney Pauly replied his reaction to having a private party sand public
( roads is inviting some problems as he does not know if it can be enforced and
how the standards could be drawn.
City Manager Ulstad added sanding Valley View Road is a County responsibility,
and the County would have to respond to it in the same manner they respond to
residential streets. If Braun's chose to sand with some kind of rig,
it is up to the County to say "no" they can't, or "yes", they can.
Councilwoman Pauly asked if this could be one of those situations if it
were allowed to happen would become so bad the County would have to come and do
something about it. Jullie replied it certainly would add to the warrants
for upgrading, but as he sees it on those days when it is that bad the trucks
are just going to have to go the other direction (as they are leaving Braun's
turn and go west on Valley View Road to Hwy. 169 rather than attempt to go
up a steep grade).
Ulstad explained the County does not have any funds and as that area continues
to develop as it has in the past, he feels the City is going to make a request
to the County to make some improvements. Ulstad envisions the City as having
to carry the ball and assess the improvements over the entire area.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to continue the Public Hearing
for Braun's Fashions,and directed Staff to research if there is a way to
resolve the matter of grade and access to the property. Motion carried
unanimously.
B. Northmark East by Ban-Con. Request to rezone 5.2 acres from Rural to
RM 6.5 and preliminary plat the property for 32 quadra-minium units.
Located West of Center Way, across from Hyland Terrace and Northmark
Drive. (Ordinance No. BO-14 and Resolution No. 80-99)
Hans Hagen, Ban-Con Corporation, presented the development plans to the
Council.
City Planner Enger explained this item was reviewed by the Planning Commission
on April 28, 1980. The Commission recommmended approval of the proposal on a
4 - 0 vote with 1 "abstention", subject to the Planning Staff Report dated
April 23, 1980, which Mr. Enger detailed for the Council.
Director of Community Services Lambert reported the Parks, Recreation &
Natural Resources Commission reviewed this proposal on May 19, 1980, and the .
Comnission recommended approval unanimously to the Council as per the Planning
Staff Report dated April 23, 1980.
Wayne Jorgenson, 11240 Windrow Drive, asked why Center Way was terminated as
a flow through road. Enger replied last year Hartford Development Corporation
proposed on 163 acres north of this residential area an office park. Originally
10 years ago when Center Way was contemplated the City felt and developers
felt that there may be an additional higher residential area up north of the
existing residential, and it was for this purpose that Center Way was continued.
When that concept slowly changed over the years to the point where it is
office land use and when that land use was reviewed?the residents in the area
were particularly opposed to the connection of Center Way to the more commercial
area. Their feeling was commercial traffic would short cut through the
residential area, thus Center Way was terminated,
/6'J
City Council Minutes - 5 - Tues.,June 3, 1980
B. Northmark East b,y_Ban-Con (continued)
Jorgenson added the Ban-Con quadra-miniums proposed seem fine, however, there are
a lot of quads in Bloomington across County Road 18 which he feels do not look
very nice, and asked the Council in the future whenever quads are being
considered in Eden Prairie that the Council be careful about the quality of the
homes and the compactness so that there is essential living space, In the •
Preserve area there is one park in the center of the area which is serving
an awful lot of children and he thinks it is important to allow for living spaces
whether they be called tot lots or park areas, and also be aware of the beauty
of the homes and the aesthetics of the area,not just trying to cram them in.
Pauly thanked Mr. Jorgenson for his comments and complimented Mr. Hagen on the -
attractive design of the proposed quadra-miniums.
Jay Peterson, 11179 Windrow Drive, commented he sees this project as adding
a tremendous amount of traffic to Center Way, which is already a lot busier
road than he expected to be living on. Mr. Peterson asked if it is
possible to return the access to the area directly to Preserve Boulevard.
Enger recited two reasons for not returning the access to the area directly
to Preserve Boulevard: 1) the Northmark East and Northmark West parcels are
independent parcels, not connected by common ownership. The parcel inbetween
is owned and zoned as a part of the Hartford Insurance proposal which would be
for berms and the parking lot areas and that type of thing and 2) it would
create a cul-de-sac in excess of perhaps a 1/4 to 1/2 mile in length. From a
technical standpoint the City would like to try and stay away from long dead-
end cul-de-sacs. Center Way was designed originally as a through road, so it was
designed to carry significantly higher traffic volumes than it is now carrying,
and certainly does have the capacity to carry 32 additional units.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing and
give a 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 80-14, rezoning 5.2 acres from Rural to
RM 6.5 for 32 quadra-minium units for Northmark East by Ban-Con. Motion
carried unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution No, 80-99,
approving the preliminary plat for Northmark East by Ban-Con, Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to direct staff to draft a
developer's agreement incorporating the recommendations of the Planning
Commission/Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission and Staff Report
dated April 23, 1980, including map on page 4 of the Report. Motion carried
unanimously.
Larry Peterson, representing The Preserve, requested the Council to consider
granting a grading permit allowing them to start grading on Northmark West
subject to the approval of the Watershed District.
MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Redpath, to grant the request by
Mr. Peterson for the issuance of a grading permit for
Northmark West subject to the approval of the Watershed District
and review in advance by City Staff. Motion carried unanimously.
10;1
City Council Minutes - 6 - Tues.,June 3, 1980
C. Northmark West by_Dan-Con_ Request to rezone 11.7 acres from Rural to
RM 6.5 and preliminary plat the property for 68 quadra-minium units.
Located east of Preserve Boulevard and North of Westwind Addition.
(Ordinance No. 80-15 and Resolution No. 80-100)
Hans Hagen, Ban-Con Corporation, spoke to the proposal and displayed graphics
depicting same.
City Planner Enger explained this item was heard at the May 12, 1980 Planning
Commission meeting, and the Commission recommended approval to the Council
on a 4 - 0 vote with 1 "abstention" as per the Staff Report dated April 22,
1980.
Director of Community Services Lambert added the Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission considered this item on May 19, 1980 and recommended
unanimous approval to the Council as per the Planning Staff Report dated
April 22, 1980.
Osterholt referred to concerns expressed by residents regarding the storm
drainage, and requested that any problems be resolved with the Engineering
Department prior to any construction.
Osterholt further added it was the indication of the developer that people
moving into the quadra-miniums do not intend to have families so there is not
a need for tot lots; however, he asked Staff before a 2nd Reading to make
inquiries of the areas where there are quadra-miniums in Eden Prairie and
Bloomington and find out from the School District how many children are enrolled
in those areas. If we find the opposite is true, we should have some kind
of playfields or play areas for the children.
Lambert commented there was some discussion at the Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission regarding this situation, and it was pointed out the
developer's are willing to construct a tot lot. However, there is a tot lot
located not very far south of Northmark West so the Commission suggested a rest
area with bench, picnic table, etc., to be put along the trailway instead of
putting in a tot lot which may not be used.
Osterholt asked that the figures still be provided to the Council, as residents
of Northmark may feel this development should provide some of those amenities.
Don Irving, 11345 Lanewood Circle, asked if the developer could take some of the
nice big rocks that are located within the development and put in his area for a
berm as the 3 houses, one of which he owns, do not have a berm or any land-
scaping. Mr. Hagen displayed a new landscaping plan which does define the
area which Mr. Irving expressed concern about. The new plan consists of
different size and types of plant materials and Mr. Hagen added they are planning
to meet with City Staff to review the landscaping plan. If the landscaping plan
meets the staff's approval, they will be willing to proceed with same.
Mr. Irving felt the new landscaping plan as detailed by Mr. Hagen would seem to
satisfy his request. Council suggested Mr. flagon meet with Mr. Irving on the
landscaping plan, which both parties agreed to do.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to close the Public Hearing
and give a 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 80-15, rezoning 11.7 acres from
Rural to RM 6.5 for 68 quadra-minium units for Northmark West by Ban-Con.
Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No.
80-100, approving the preliminary plat for Northmark West by Ban-Con.
Motion carried unanimously.
•
City Council Minutes - 7 - Tues.,June 3, 1980
C. Northmark Westjy Ban-Con (continued)
{ MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to direct Staff to draft a
developer's agreement incorporating the recommendations of the Planning
Conniission/Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission and Staff
Report dated April 22, 1980. Further that the concerns be addressed
regarding storm drainage, tot lot, and landscaping plan. Motion carried
unanimously.
D. Re rnest for Municipal Industrial Development Bond approval in the amount
of $1,750,000.00 for Wilson Learning Corporation-T-Resolution No. 80-102
Steve Jacobs, Dain Bosworth Incorporated, representing the proponents as the
agent in the proposed transaction,spoke to the application as submitted to the
Council. Jacobs believes this project satisfies both State and Federal law
and will add substantially to the tax base, and it is presently anticipated
that they will be employing approximately 30 additional people after the
completion of the project. Dain Bosworth Incorporated will be representing
Wilson Learning Corporation as an agent and the bond will be placed privately
with a financial institution. Jacobs added Wilson Learning is a private
company and they wish to stay that way. They are looking at mid-summer for
the sale of the bonds.
Osterholt asked what is the anticipated life of the equipment and length of
terms of the bonds. Mr. Jacobs replied typically what they do is structure
the bond issue in two parts: 1) a shorter term maturity that represents
the investment in equipment, and 2) a longer maturity term for brick and mortar.
Wayne Jorgenson, 11240 Windrow Drive (Assistant Vice President and registered
representative of Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood), spoke against the request for
MIDB's for Wilson Learning Corporation and asked the Council to consider what
the original purpose of municipal bond offerings or IDR's were when they were
established many years ago. Municipal bond offers or IDR's, according to
Mr. Jorgenson, were oftentimes brought about to help industry to bring in
employment to the community. Jorgenson added along with that should be
considered the fact that Wilson Learning Corporation is already established,
that they are an ongoing concern, and consider the fact they should not be using
taxpayers money to subsidize that corporation's expansion. It is altogether
possible, Jorgenson stated, this corporation could go out and privately place
their own funds, which is called corporate bonds or corporate debt, and not use
government subsidies to do so. Also Jorgenson asked the Council to consider what l
the government funds are being used for as far as resale value of the equipment,
reuse of the property and building, should the company default.
Mr. Jacobs replied Wilson Learning Corporation did apply to Twin City Federal
for conventional financing and Twin City Federal said "no". Wilson Learning
has had an 8-year history with TCF in the past and they are current on their
obligations with TCF. Revenue bonds are not subsidized by taxpayers; revenue
bonds are sold to institutions, individuals and banks. The interest on revenue
bonds is tax exempt in the hands of the holder. There is no governmental
assistance and there is no subsidy by residents of Eden Prairie and there is
nothing that affects their individual taxes. In fact, it can be argued that the
new facility proposed when it goes on the real estate taxes will supply
additional services. In 1933, Mississippi was the first state to adopt
industrial revenue bond financing. Their purpose which was taken right from
Federal Statutes, was to balance industry with agriculture. They had a
significant amount of agriculture and very little industry, and they said that
the public purpose is to bring in new or endure existing firms to stay within the
State. Mississippi has been the example that every other state had adopted -
some states have adopted a little more conservative law and others a more liberal
/4-1h J1
;ity Council Minutes - 8 - Tues.,June 3, 1980
D. Request for MIDB's for Wilson Learning Corporation (continued)
law. In the literal interpretation of the State laws this is not a subsidy,
this is a corporate debt, guaranteed by Wilson Learning Corporation, and it meets
all the State and Federal guidelines.
Edstrom asked why Wilson Learning Corporation was turned down by Twin City Federal.
Matthew Juechter, President of Wilson Learning Corporation, replied the only reason
TCF turned them down was because TCF didn't have any money as they are only able
to raise money through the deposits that they have in their institutions on which
they pay 8, 9 or 10,, and there are opportunities for people to deposit money
elsewhere where they can earn l2, 13, 14 or 15%, thus leaving the savings and loan
institution with no money to give to their customers. Juechter added TCF is very
happy with Wilson Learning Corporation's financial picture. The following is
the employment record of Wilson Learning Corporation as supplied by Mr. Juechter:
1977 - 66 employees; 1978 - 78 employees; 1979 - 93 employees; and 130 employees
anticipated in 1980. The actual number of total employees in the company at the
end of the fiscal year on April 3D has already reached 161, of which approximately
30 are not residents of Eden Prairie, Wilson Learning Corporation has been growing
approximately 35 to 40% a year, and the majority of employees live in Eden Prairie.
Dsterholt stated he appreciated Mr. Jorgenson's remarks and by way of information
the City has developed a set of guidelines which he invited Mr. Jorgenson to look at.
Further Osterholt invited Mr. Jorgenson to submit any suggestions to the Council
which he may have. Osterholt added the Council in the past has not approved all
requests for MIDB's.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to close the Public Hearing and
( adopt Resolution No. 80-102, approving the request for Municipal Industrial
Development Bonds in the amount of $1,750,000.00 for Wilson Learning Corporation.
Motion carried unanimously.
E. Establishment of an IIRA (Housing & Redevelopment Authority) for Tax Increment
Financing (Resolu a on„o. 83-112)
Finance Director Frane spoke to his memo dated May 15, 1980, and the two additional
Public Hearings which must be held by the Council in order for the NRA to proceed
on a given project as per State Statutes.
City Attorney Pauly explained the real objective of considering the adoption of
a Housing & Redevelopment Area this evening is ultimately to adopt a Tax Increment
Plan for a Tax Increment District, specifically in the Major Center Area and
specifically for the construction of improvements such as roads, etc., to complete
the Ring Route and other access and feeder roads. In order to adopt a tax increment
financing plan it is necessary to have a vehicle, in the first instance, for that plan.
One of those vehicles is a Housing & Redevelopment Authority such as is being proposed
this evening.
City Attorney Pauly added another of those vehicles is a so-called Development District
under another Minnesota Statutes (Chapter 472A.). He has discussed with various
people the possibility of the viability of utilizing the Development District other
than the Housing & Redevelopment Authority as that vehicle. Pauly explained the
Development District vehicle has some legal questions because of some language in the
act which spells out the legislative intention or purpose of the act. It is the
opinion of some of the people from the Dorsey firm that the language which talks
about development of a built-up type of area would indicate that particular chapter
is not suitable for this specific kind of development.
City Council Minutes - 9 - Tues.,June 3, 1980
E. Establishment of an HRA (Housing & Redevelopment Authority) for Tax Increment
Financier (continued) -
City Attorney Pauly stated on the other hand, the representative from the Dorsey
office recognizes that the Major Center Area is "A" typical of a district to which
a Housing & Redevelopment Authority would apply, and they do feel that there is
sufficient authority granted by the Legislature in the act through amendments, etc.,
which would make a reasonable case for the use of Tax Increment Financing
Pauly continued, there will be a series of Public Hearings after this one tonight
if the Council chooses to adopt the HRA approach - the second hearing with reference
to a development project, and the third hearing with reference to a Tax Increment
District. It is felt that through that process of Public Hearings it will give
everyone an opportunity to sense the appropriateness and the acceptance of this plan.
The Council is under certain time constraints because of the Tax Increment Law.
The City may be able to pick up some of the increased assessed valuations attributable
to certain projects which are even now in the building if all of this can be adopted
prior to this Fall.
On the basis of his review and discussions, Pauly suggested that the only viable
alternative at this point is the adoption of the Housing & Redevelopment Act.
MDTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing and
adopt Resolution No. 80-112, establishing a Housing & Redevelopment Authority
for the City of Eden Prairie, and instructing staff to pursue the alternative of a
Development District approach with a report to the Council prior to the 2nd
Hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 1703 - 1859
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Estrom, to approve Payment of Claims Nos.
1703 - 1859. Roll Call Vote: Edstrom and Redpath voted "aye" on Claims Nos.
1703 - 1859; Osterholt "abstained" on Claim No. 1820 and voted "aye" on all other
Claims Nos.; and Pauly "abstained" on Claim No. 1794 and voted "aye" on all other
Claims Nos. Motion carried.
VI. REPDRTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
A. Report from the Hunting/Shooting Zone Committee
City Manager Ulstad explained Captain Keith Wall was the staff representative
to the Hunting/Shooting Zone Committee and at this point the committee is
submitting a report to the Council as requested. At some point in time the
Council may want to, based on this report, change some of the hunting
boundaries and also incorporate some of the restrictions that are recommended
relative to the Mitchell Lake area.
Dsterholt requested that maps be provided to the Council delineating the
specific areas for hunting as the map the Council received was too broad.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to instruct the Staff and City
Attorney to draft an ordinance to be submitted to the Council for review at
the July 1, 1980 Council meeting incorporating the reconur•enations of the
Hunting/Shooting Zone Committee. Motion carried unanimously.
I5��/)
City council M,, tes - 10 - Tues.,June 3, 1980
VII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Appointment of 2 members to CAG (Citizens Advisory Group)
MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Osterholt, to appoint James
Osberg as a member of CAG (Citizens Advisory Group). Motion carried
unanimously.
A second appointment to the Citizens Advisory Group was continued
to the June 17, 1980 Council meeting.
8. Report of City Attorney.
No report.
Edstrom was excused from the meeting at this time (10:00 PM),
C. Report of City Manager
1. Discussion on Dog Impounding Fees (Ordinance No. 134)
City Manager Ulstad spoke to memo from Chief Hacking on the impounding
fees charged by other communities, Eden Prairie being the lowest.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to instruct the City Attorney
to upgrade the Fee Ordinance (Ordinance No. 280), and draft an ordinance
amending Ordinance No. 134 (Dog impounding fees) to include the following
fees: $25.00 for the first impoundment, $50.00 for the second impoundment,
and $100.00 for the third impoundment. Motion carried unanimously. •
D. Report of City Engineer
1. Approve RLS and right-of-way trade-off for Schooner Boulevard extension
north of W. 78th Street
City Engineer Jullie spoke to his memo dated May 29, 1980, and answered
questions of Council members.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to receive and file the memo
from City Engineer Jullie dated May 29, 1980, and that this item be
brought back to the Council for approval of the final purchase price.
Motion carried unanimously.
2. Extend bid opening date for Valley View Road/Dell Road, Phase 2, I.C.
51-325
This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (III. L.).
E. Report of Finance Director
1. 1979 Audit Report
Because of the absence of two Council members, Osterholt requested that this
item be continued to July 15, 1980. Pauly and Redpath concurred with Osterholt':j
request.
.111. NEW BUSINESS
No "New Business".
IX. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adjourn the Council meeting at
• in.11 PM Mntinn rarri..4 unanimnncly Yrr-/
s _
•
EDEN PRAIRIE REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION
14500 Valley View Road
7770►Aitcaal-Road
Eden Prairie,Minnesota-55943- 55344
612 941-5300
937-8300 {'
June 13, 1980
AN 4 31980
Eden Prairie City Council
c/o Roger Ulstad, City Manager
Eden Prairie City Hall
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Honorable Mayor and City Council:
The Eden Prairie Planning Commission at their June 9, 1980,
meeting approved the recommendation to the City Council for
acceptance of P.U.D. approval and preliminary plat approval of
property located in the South East corner of Anderson Lakes
Parkway and Highway 11169 (portions of Outlots J and K, Lake Eden,
together with the Western Oil Company site).
Eden Prairie Real Estate Investment Corporation hereby requests
that the council set a public hearing date for a hearing such P.U.D.
and preliminary plat approval.
Sincerely,
EDEN PRAIRIE REAL ESTATE
IN STMT CORPORATION
chumacher
Vice-president
KES/mm
i'6
American Family Ins. Bldg. 2 - RAP
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA •
Ordinance No. 80_12
( i
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING •
ORDINANCE NO. 135
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended as
follows: The following described property, as set forth in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof
shall be and hereby is removed from the Rural District
and shall be included hereinafter in the Office District.
Section 2. The above-described property shall be subject to the
terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as
of
1981), between American Family Mutual
Insurance Company, a Wisconson corporation,
and the City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement is hereby made a part
hereof and shall further be subject to all of the ordinances, rules
and regulations of the City of Eden Prairie relating to the Office
District.
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after
its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Eden Prairie on the _ day of
1980, and
finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting
of the City Council of said City on the -- day of ,
1980.
Wolfgang II. Penzel - Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Franc City Clerk
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the __ day of __� 1980•
•
•
AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE BUILDING 2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
That part of Lot 3, Block 1, Opus II 2nd Addition, lying
easterly of a line drwn parallel to and 171.28 feet west
of the west lot line of Lot 2 of said Addition. '
1
EXHIBIT A •
•
•
/669
•
nay 44, a,••••
American Family Ins.
----- Bldg. 2
E DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT -
TH
IS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of e / ¢-e, ,
1980 by and between AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a
Wisconsin corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Owner" and
the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter .
referred to as "City", i
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Owner has applied to City to rezone from Rural
to Office approximately 3 acres, situated in Hennepin County
State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached
hereto and made a part hereof and hereafter referred to as "the
( property", and
WHEREAS, Owner desires to develop the property to construct
thereon a 3 story building containing 50,830 square feet of floor I
space, and 1
WHEREAS, the property is a part of lands included within 1
PUD 74-06. j,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting 3
i
Ordinance 80-12, Owner covenants and agrees to construction I
upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows:
1. Owner shall plat and develop the property in conformance
with the material dated April 30, 1980 reviewed and
approved by the City Council on May 20, 1980 and attached S
hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifica- SS
tions as provided herein. Owner shall not develop the
property in any other respect or manner than provided
herein.
2. In the event Owner shall in the future request approval
of the City for any further development of the property,
Owner shall (a) investigate and submit information as to
• the use of parking ramp(s) for existing and future
/55`1A
•
Developer's Agreement-American Family Ins. Bldg. 2 Page 2
buildings and (b) provide constructive and detailed
information depicting existing vegetation and siting
of structures.
3. All on-site utilities must be maintained by Owner.
4. In implementation and amendment of and supplemental to
PUD 74-06 and as a variance from certain requirements
imposed by City Ordinance 135, as amended, City authorizes
the siting of a building upon the property as indicated in
Exhibit B. -
•
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have
caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year
aforesaid.
CITY:
By:
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
By:
Roger K. Ulstad, Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of , 1980 by Wolfgang H. Penzel, the Mayor and
Roger K. Ulstad, the City Manager of Eden Prairie on behalf of
the corporation.
Notary Public
OWNER:
By: ‘"L/
STATE OF MINNESOTA) Ro ert J. undson, Vice-President
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The forecoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of 1980 by Robert J. Amundson, Vice-President o
Americ n FamiTy Mutual Insurance Company on behalf of the corpor-
ation.
Notary Public
RITA RITA I.UNDERHILL
p Notary Public.Duns County Wis.
55% E) My Commission Gplres May 9,1982
AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE BUILDING 2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION •
That part of Lot 3, Block 1, Opus II 2nd Addition, lying
easterly of a line drawn rarallel to and 171.28 feet west
of the west lot line of Lot 2 of said Addition Hennepin
County, Minnesota.
• ,
EXHIBIT A
/55�T
.
•
north
• •
(� 4 BLUE cincLE ceAt
. \ .--..\:• .
... . ..... ''''.. . • i
''' 11 ` 'e
I.. •---._ '3...--\--- 1‘, .-t-ila .' ,
it. ., ..... ,
_ .•
,..... v
i:
....
. ......... .. :.......\ i c. .
�" "\ \,. . ..t...,
• (.1 ail •`"''-
111\\J-..-. '
i ? y
1✓i- K• '�\ .
•••• ••( .
"EXHIBIT B" •
l5 r`I L7 April 30,19B0
N.S.P. Substation
•
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of ,1980
•
by and between NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "Owner" and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", •
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Owner has applied to City for Planned Unit Development approval
for development of approximately 12 acres, situated in Hennepin County,
State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and
made a part hereof and hereafter referred to as "the property", and •
WHEREAS, the property is situated in the Major Center Area Planned
Unit Development (PUD).
WHEREAS, Owner desires to develop the property as a Northern States
Power Substation. •
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Resolution NO.80-03,
Owner covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance
of said property as follows:
1. Owner shall develop the property in conformance with the
material dated Dec.11, 1979, reviewed and approved by the
City Council on May 6, 1980 and attached hereto as Exhibit 8,
subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein.
Owner shall not develop the property in any other respect or
.canner than contained herein.
2. Owner shall, prior to any development upon the property, submit •
to City for review and approval a detailed landscaping and
grading plan, including but not limited to screening of the •
property from the north and south. Owner shall grade and landscape
the property according to the approved plan during the year 1981.
i
3. Owner shall, prior to any construction upon the property, submit
detailed plans to the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District
for review and approval.
/5
•
Developer's Agreement•hSP Substation page 2
4. Owner shall replace the supporting structure work of the 345 KV
lines extending through the City in a North/South direction with
architectural tubular steel poles when replacement becomes necessary.
Owner shall replace the supporting structure of the 115 KV line from
the Eden Prairie Substation to the Westgate substation during the
years 1990-1995 and the 115 KV line from the Eden Prairie Substation
to Edina during the years 1987-1989 with architectural tubular steel
poles.
5. Owner shall not, or permit others to, perform any construction upon
the property which would substantially interfer with the drainage
of water of other lands across or through the property.
6. In implementation of arid supplemental to PUD 80-06and as a variance
from certain requirements imposed by City Ordinance 135, as amended,
City authorizes the following:
A. Structures constructed upon the property may be built of
materials and to heights as indicated on Exhibit B.
B. Structures may he located upon the property as shown on
Exhibit B.
7. Owner shall submit to City for review and approval detailed land
development plans as required by City prior to any request for
future zoning, platting or development upon the property.
8. Owner shall pay a cash park fee of 51,400.00/acre (12 acres) prior
to the issuance of any building permit upon the property.
9. It is recognized that if service dates for the installation of the
substation or transmission lines are to change because of the economy.
Owner will inform the City of its new in service dates.
/1;6
Developer's Agr•eernent-N.S.P. Substation page 3
•
IN W1TNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have caused these
• presents to be executed as of the day and year aforesaid.
CITY:
BY:
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
BY:
Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
1980 by Wolfgang H. Penzel, the Mayor and Roger K. Ulstad, the City Manager
of Eden Prairie, on behalf of the corporation. •
•
Notary Public
OWNER:
BY: �4 I
A.W. Benkusky,
Genera)?Manager,
Eovi nmeptal Regulatory Activities
i `y‘!
BY• i� !rn'' tic
• R.W. Comstock, Vice-President,
Environmental Regulatory Activities
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of f ,
3930 by A.W. Benkusky, General Manager and R.W. Comstock,-Vice-President of
Environmental Regulatory Activities of Northern States Power on behalf of the
corporation. , ty
•
{4.. �, HAROLD 1 EACUY
NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA Notary Public /r , f
ti"tsr, HENNEPrN COJNTY
N y Cafin.$I?f E.purs Ain't 30,198& I 'r
.vnNvv..^,vv.�nvrn�vvvv,��ti.,
!0
•
NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY SUBSTATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
That part of the Southwest ; of Section 11, Township
116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying south
of the southerly right of way line of New State Highway
•
No. 5 and northerly of the northerly right of way line
of Old State Highwy No. 5, except that part lying East
of a line drawn parallel to and 292. 45 feet east of the
west line of the southeast 1 of said southwest 4.
•
EXHIBIT A
/663
•
•
' -�,,_T.s`•.-�Its:^�
•
NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
M:NNI"APOLlfl. MIN'.ESOTA .2,1401
•
December 11, 1979
Mr Arthur Sidner, Chairman
Minnesota Environmental Quality Board
Capitol Square Building •
550 Cedar Street
St Paul, MN 55101
EXEMPTION APPLICATION
City of Eden Prairie
345 kv Double 'Circuit Tap and Associated Facilities
Northern States Power Company hereby respectfully requests an
exemption from the Power Plant Siting Act in accordance with
•
Mn. Statutes 116 C57 Subd. 5 for a 345 kv transmission line tap
and associated facilities in the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
{ This line will be approximately 600 feet long and will connect
to a proposed 345-115 kv electrical substation (see attached
maps) . The proposed construction will begin in the spring of
1984 and be in service by summer 1985. •
Attached is the necessary information for the exemption of the •
345-115 kv transmission tap and associated facilities.
•
In accordance with the rules governing exemption request, copies
•
of this application have been sent to the mayor and City Council
of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, flernepir. County and the Metropolitan
Council.
The attached public notice will be placed in the Finance and . •
Conoercc Daily newspaper, Eden Prairie News, the City's official
newspaper and Eden Prairie Sun.
A %i BENKUSKY, Genera Manager
Environmental .& Regulatory Activities Department `1
ve
•
attachments
•
EXHIBIT B
•
115614
•
No;,.;.'!-S. .N STATLI3 FOWEFY COMP. ..JY
EXEMPTION APPLICATION
345 kv Substation and Transmission Tap Structure
•
Introduction
Communities in the southwestern Twin Cities suburban area are
among some of the fastest expanding in the metropolitan region.
These communities include Minnctonka, Bloomington, and Eden
Prairie. High growth activity in this area will cause a need
for new electric transmission facilities to serve this area by
the mid 1980's.
This Exemption Application describes the need for a new electric
transmission source in Eden Prairie and the alternate plans to
accomplish this and the environmental impact associated with the
alternatives.
Electric Service in the Twin Cities Area •
Communities within the Twin Cities metropolitan area have tended
towards a higher density development than most of the other
regions in Minnesota. Recognizing this, NSP has developed a major
345 kv (345,000 V) transmission loop around the Twin Cities area.
This loop was developed to supply the electrical requirements of
the area for a similar reason that the freeway system was developed
around the Twin Cities to meet the high capacity transportation
needs. Major power supply substations were developed around the
345 kv loop to input power into the 115 kv transmission system
which supplies the local communities.
The sources of the electric power used by communities in the Twin
Cities area are generating plants located on the 345 kv loop.
There arc also smaller generating plants at various locations on
the 115 kv transmission system in the Twin Cities area. The
philosophy was to locate generating plants at several locations
I6.(DS
NOt T}' :N 8 T ATE:5 FOV✓i R COMI NV
Page 2
•
around the 345 kv loop in order to minimize new transmission {'
development. Part of the plan was to locate a major generating
plant in the southwestern corner of the Twin Citics area near
Shakopee. Previous arrangements were made with Eden Prairie to
supply the electric power requirements in the southwestern
Twin Cities area communities based on the development of a gen-
erating plant in Scott County near Shakopee. This involved
development of a 115 kv transmission line from the plant site
through Eden Prairie to the Westgate Substation.
Through a plant siting process involving a citizens advisory group
and a Minnesota state agency, the proposed generating plant near
Shakopee was developed northwest of the Twin Cities in Sherburne
County. This change in generating plant location required modi-
fication to the transmission development for the southwestern
portion of the Twin Cities.
The attached map (Exhibit A) indicates the amount of electric power
expected to be supplied to the Twin Cities area from various gen-
erating sources located on the 345 kv loop during the mid 1980's.
Most of this power is generated from plants in the northwest. In
fact, some of this power is delivered through the 345 kv loop south
into rural south central Minnesota.
Electric power for communities in the southwestern Twin Cities area
is supplied primarily from the Parkers Lake Substation located in
Plymouth. The Blue Lake Substation in Shakopee also supplies some
of the electric power required in this area. However, since much
of the electric power supplied to the southwestern Twin Cities arca
is from the north, Parkers Lake Substation delivers much more of
the power into the 115 kv system than Blue Lake Substation (Exhibit B).
NOF;TF RN STATES POWER COM! NY
Page 3
Growth in the Southwestern Twin Cities Area_Communities
The communities in the southwestern portion of the Twin Cities
are presently among the fastest expanding of the entire metro
area. The residential, coiruercial, and industrial development
that is taking place also means electric power usage in the area .
will increase. Since 1968 co;.,munities in the southwestern Twin -
Cities area have experienced an average annual growth in electric
peak demand of 10 percent per year. There is evidence that in
general this growth rate is slowing down. However, we do expect
that development in these communities through the mid 1960's
will cause an electric peak demand growth of approximately
4 percent per year.
The community of Eden Prairie is one of the fastest growing in
the southwestern Twin Cities area. Over the past 10 years Eden
Prairie has increased its average electric energy.use by 14 per-
cent per year. It is apparent, by examining a number of indicators,
that growth in Eden Prairie will continue. Construction has been
occurring at a rapid rate and current plans indicate this should
continue. Approximately 20 new office warehouses or office
buildings in Eden Prairie have been connected to the NSP distri-
bution system already this year. Several housing developments are
under way south and west of Anderson Lakes. Some proposed con-
struction which has been identified for development in Eden Prairie
by 1965 includes three industrial parks and seventeen office or
office warehouse buildings.
The percentage increase in enrollment in Eden Prairie School ,
District #272 is expected to be 7.3 percent between 1978 and 1979.
This is the second highest increase in the eight-county metropolitan
area and the only increase over 2 percent in the southwestern Twin
Cities communities.
1 B
.•
I61 •
•
NQF2T1 i•RN sTATFS PoWfcmm COM .NY
•
Page 4
•
The ongoing development in all communities in the southwestern area,
especially in t•lonnetonka, Eden Prairie and Bloomington, will result
in increasing electric power usage in this area and will cause
equipment in the Parkers Lake Substation to be loaded above its
capacity by 1986.
A temporary solution to the need for increased capacity in the
southwestern Twin Cities areas was provided a few years ago by
operating one of the two 345 kv lines between Parkers Lake Sub-
station and Blue Lake Substation at 115 kv and supply the communi-
ties of Eden Prairie, Bloomington, Minnetonka and Edina from this
line. However, operation of the 315 kv line at 115 kv restricts
the amount of power that can be delivered from the 345 kv loop into
115 kv transmission system. By the mid to late 1980's this trans-
mission line will again have to operate at 345 kv as an integral part
of the high voltage power transmission loop.
Exhibits C and D describe the load forecast and give a more
detailed account of the need for additional transformer capacity
in this area.
Electric Power Step y Alternatives
If no other major facilities are constructed, Parkers Lake Sub-
station
will continue to be the primary electrical source to the
southwestern Twin Cities area communities. The continued increase
in electrical load growth expected by 1986 will increase power flows
and could damage equipment (345-115 kv transformers) at Parkers Lake
thus causing an interruption of service. In addition, by the mid to
late 1980's we will need to return the existing 115 kv line from
Parkers Lake Sub to Blue Lake Sub to 345 kv. There are basically
three alternatives to remedy this situation (however, only two of the
alternatives will work given the existing electrical system in the
southwestern Twin City area) .
•
NORTHE STATES POWER COMP. .Y
•
Page 5 ,
The first alternative is to add an additional 345/115 kv trans-
former at Parkers Lake Substation. This would relieve the loading
on the existing transformers and prevent damage to the equipment.
In order to provide for increased electrical growth south of Parkers•
Lake Substation'some of the existing outlets from Parkers Lake would
have to be upgraded. Specifically the two mile long Parkers Lake to I
Gleason Lake 115 kv line would have to be rebuilt to double circuit
115 kv and the existing eight mile long Gleason Lake-Glen Lake-
Westgate 69 kv line would have to be replaced (either rebuilt in
place or on a new route) with a double circuit 115 kv line. These
new lines would pass through the communities of Minnetonka, Plymouth,
Wayzata and Eden Prairie. These cities have various permit require-
ments for construction of transmission lines.
The second alternative will not electrically work with the present
distribution of electrical facilities but we are including it to
illustrate the interdependence of the electrical system. The second
alternative would be to build a double circuit 115 kv line from Blue
Lake Substation to Westgate Substation - a distance of 7-8 miles. 1
This alternative was viable when a generating unit was considered for
Sibley or Scott County and will not work unless a source of at least
400 megawatts is connected to the Blue Lake Substation.
1.
The third and preferred plan would be to construct a 345/115 kv
substation in the City of Eden Prairie and connect it to both the
Westgate and Edina Substations with a new higher 115 kv capacity I,
•
•
I5(9
NOR T E-. .+."N CTF.TES i-OVvi COM{ .NY
Page 6
transmission line. Since the 345 kv line and the 115 kv line
cross near Highway 15 and 1494, a substation near this location
would greatly reduce the need to build additional transmission
lines and will satisfy the growing electric power needs in the
area where the need is increasing the fastest.
•
Not only does the development of a 345-115 kv substation in Eden
Prairie minimize the physical impact of developing hew facilities
but it is also the lowest cost alternative. Supplying the
increasing electric power requirements from Parkers Lake Sub-
station would require an investment between $13 and $14 million
during the 1986-88 time period. Supplying the power from facili-
ties in Eden Prairie would require an investment of approximately
$7 million over the same time period.
Environmental Setting
Community
The substation site ,property consisting of 12.3 acres is now for
sale. Located on these properties are:
•
1. Residential home (which is rented) .
2. Another residential house used for
. offices of a real estate business.
3. Photo factory to the south of the subject
sub site, basically not affected.
4. Across the road from the sub site is Rosemount
Industries with the balance of the property i.
listed as industrial sites.
There are so known historic or archeological sites in the vicinity
of the proposed site.
16'?O
•
•
NORTHE V STATES POWER COMP. Y
Page 7
Noise
The noise level of the operation of the proposed substation will
not result in attaining any additional noise problems to the area
because it is adjacent to Highways 494 and 5. It is a very
compatible location. •
•
Environmental Description
Geo]og.+
•
The study area is located in the northwest corner of the Owatonna
Moraine physiographic area. This area is within the Minnesota
River drainage basin.
Soils and HXdrolo4Y
The soils of the study area of the Estherville-Dickman-Dakota
Association; nearly level, to hilly, moderately coarse textured
and medium--textured soils underlain by sand and gravel. gg
The study area is interspersed with small lakes and marshes.
Purgatory Creek flows through the study area.
Vegetation
The original vegetation of the study area was Oak Savanna with
the trees being predominantly bur oaks. The existing vegetation
consists of grasses (predominantly blue grass and brome grass) ,
scattered shrubs (hazel, dogwood and prickly ash) and trees
(American elm, bur oak, boxe]der, poplars and willow) .
NORTH V STATES POWER COMP. ;Y
Page 8
• i
wildlife
Wildlife in the area of the proposed project are species typical
of east-central Minnesota. Some representative species are as
follows: ring-necked pheasant, mallard, red-winged blackbird,
field sparrow, plains pocket gopher and. striped skunk.
•
Environmental Impacts
Geology and Soils
— — e
Construction and operation of the proposed facility will not 9'
affect the geology of the study area. The soil type on the pro-
posed site is "fill land", a miscellaneous land type that consists
of soil material that has been used to fill in depressions.
Construction of the substation will require stripping, grading
and placement of gravel for final grade. Exposed soil outside
of the substation will be landscaped (leveled and seeded) to
•
prevent soil erosion.
HydrolO9
The area's water table level, groundwater recharge zones and
water quality will not be adversely affected by the proposed
construction and operation of the substation. Landscaping and
seeding will preclude soil erosion resulting in sediment layden
runoff.
Wildlife
Significant wildlife habitat does not exist in or immediately
adjacent to the project site, therefore little change is expected
in the existing wildlife populations. There are no rare or
endangered species of wildlife known to inhabit the study arca.
1512 ( ':`
•
NORTh J OTATP?O POWI_R COMi .Y
Page 9
{
Vegetation •
Removal of the vegetation (trees, grass and shrubs) is necessary
for the subsite proper. Vegetation surrounding the subsite will
receive a minimal amount of disturbance such as crossing by equip-
ment resulting in compaction.
Initial Development
Initially one 400 MVA, 345-115 kv auto transformer, two 345 kv
lines, one 345 kv gas circuit breaker, two 115 kv lines and three
115 kv, 3000 ampere oil circuit breakers will be installed.
The initial facilities will include a 20 x 50 foot colored metal
control house. The site will be graded for the ultimate develop-
ment. Near future plans provide for an additional two 115 kv
lines and two 115 kv breakers.
Ultimate Development of Substation
The proposed ultimate design provides for two 400 MVA, 345/115 kv
auto transformers, two 345 kv lines, a 115 kv ring bus with four
115 kv lines, two 70 MVA, 115-13.8 kv LTC transformers and eighteen
13.8 feeders. The ultimate fenced area will be approximately 600
feet by 300 feet.
Physical Design
The substation buses will be rigid tubular aluminum supported on
structural steel stands. Both the 345 and the 115 kv equipment
• arrangements will be of the low profile design with the highest
•
•
NORTH. J STATES POWER COMP •
.
Page 10
bus under 35 feet. The proposed tap of the 345 kv will consist
of approximately 600 feet.
•
It is anticipated the 345 kv portal towers will be of a tubular
steel design. The 115 kv portal towers will be constructed of a
tapered wide flange steel beam.
The substation will be enclosed with an aesthetic wall, approxi-
mately in size of 500' x 800' with landscaping to soften the
appearance of substation site.
i
Cost Estimate
Exhibit E gives an indicative cost estimate of the separate
portions of the two alternatives.
•
•
EXH lair "A"
,
3
• !..•
I.
,----4'_\4,,, ...,,_._
--, ,
- - --;
1
- 'i., ri---
k. -(
1 2 ----4
1 - 6
1 '
l -...\,.....,
______
1:,- ---- .,:411111111111111111111!1 111111111111IN
==-
,,
o. :.-
44,12 i._____Thig 1
..
s
,
.-,-.. g?.,
, % 0, 0,
ittiri• 01,1101:111,11:11111,1,,,,,
, .. 0
,
. .
—a I
w ..1
, .._
4 ar i
0
z : !
z
, ..
a 1g
• X
, )
i
1-
z
tr
ku
1-
in
;x — o 0
- _
4 4
CC ).
w 0
Z ‘11
W 0
O in I
I
I- I
Xi
i 1 1 II 1 1.
1 1
0
w
! 1 1 SI II .
•-.7.— i I ii
I i
- 1 1
1 III
illt)S
a
�+ �f t', •Si S' t) 'rl n \�. •t)y _- C ,I t t l 7.1 .1
i.
' Y'J
� ♦ I L 3+, 1 � 4 o
) 1
ri :11 .1.'.-ii?r, r,-,.•:j ''''.'\•... t:.---;',.-.-t-'::''.F!. 5‘-=`,..,.:; ;-I.-it:'„,i'.7\'..k:c.. •:11r- `11. ,:-',-;•••:-'''''''...-:.1:!-\.'.--1--;::). ,— -:_t: !
y.:k ,. �`:; - ,,1''' :all, ;/I •/ '/: 1..., t,
ct r �' Sy' a,, .\R'•'• ,���[ \t`� .`i ; .1\ `SL f ,/� I lT ` •
- , 4 , — .44,.....,,,,, :: ,.,. ..,.„ ,,,-.„-....„:„:„. . ,, ,,,„ • Ik-.,....t. .,:e., ,;,-....„-.-.,,,,,,,..:=4:, „.„),.....____,...1_,-:.,,:-....
i ,1.. )�:.:a:Y Fri - r ''�L.:l;.-; \7;. WI t- ? ,ti Z l { 11 1 ' m 1i_
r/ (� ;2. 1 11:C j, r - Via'
I,iti, 1 �l/r, , �, ,illt" /':`l�f..1���� � a I',
•. am T . i � . +-S`; -" Ii / / t� � �)�. . 1, �I0/'�•4- Ic' " \ -. ` f. f .r . ' i/ lyI t i -".4'rl11 . _ �: t n � 2m
i
\• fl.' 4) :`,";:f(,., 1.!-:'s .----4, t [ ,.'il,'! ,,, ; 'i ::! -1.4 ‘,\cril x'!..;.2 --'-' - ';/ 'stk I,i• -./c)
11
I.). ' I. r.•i! Fq-,-:„.--(-- 1—,..i. ,..c„.-.-i.- Ei;:d cll.'af j jr \
: r r1 - � is l i 1'.cll'r04' ,:` }\' ;,
:'... -i_,- \1•. •i, z . .S• 1 I, irk ill- < I\err s
19- ,,_:.::,, .,;-,4i,-,:,) -4,.-,1! , ,
FlL_F. ( .1; r.i l ..1 Ll L, 1 1� li I 'fi k Idr f• ti, 1T I• U \\\I ♦• �',.
` • 1l L-H
vl < I 4` ; el �__ {
`a\..."'•.� I`I I I, I-�•
•
-. �( S,I .:I1L:Yi L,.,I 1 It: I I. 1 lig//.' ,�,� \ I
I. \ N zo---ia--i'v,wctn ri, — =,-a Grnorn 6,.., \,
\
• \, to co-o -o w w 5�11:'
n to v m m c 7o O c rn A m n _ _ y =,,I .
r yc m D . ]l r m p w �� al N O O 7or:•.• �Pir
�o 3o < c y v m c� < ro c 33 O-1^ 1 1
....1
.._ T` o < T. m -a 0 ]l 1 1< x- w Z '0 C m'!r'�I ��.,(�`i
-- ��..? m N i m > '-i—1:
n -1 (Z r x ]l D _ fA DI it ��,1.• __
1 r A m O v D O 1 rn z m `` —� ��
/6) /l0
•
•
EXHIBIT C
SOUTU 'ESTERN TWIN CITIES LOAD FORECAST
•
•
The southwestern area of the Twin Cities has historically been one
of the faster growing areas. In 1967, this area had an electric
load of 216 MW. In 1978, this load was 630 MW. This shows an
average yearly annual growth of 10.2 percent. However, the effects
of the oil embargo slowed this growth rate in the later years. In
1974, the total areas' load was 502 MW. This gives an average
growth rate of 5.8 percent through 1978. Since 1975, the total
areas' growth has been a fairly constant 2.5 percent per year.
As can be seen from our forecast, the whole southwestern area is
expected to continue growing at about 2.5 percent. Much of the
( eastern half of this area is in the now established suburbs, such
as Edina and St Louis Park. There is not a lot of room left for
expansion in these suburbs and it results in a lower growth rate.
However, in the newly developing suburbs such as Eden Prairie,
western B].00mington.and eastern Minnetonka, there is moth more
available land for expansion,and the growth orate of electric load
is expected to be substantially higher. The average growth rate
expected in this portion of the southwest area is about 4 percent
per year.
•
•
•
j1
fr�� •
•
EXHIBIT D
•
• REQUIRED NEED•FOR ADDITIONAL 345-115 kv CAPACITY
IN SOUTHWEST TWIN CITIES AREA
•
Attached are two diagrams showing the expected flow of power
during the 1984 summer peak. Under normal conditions Parkers
Lake Substation is expected to carry approximately 600 MW in
1984. If an equipment failure at Parkers Lake results in the
removal of one of the two 345/115 kv transformers at Parkers
Lake from the system, the remaining transformer loads to 482 MW '
or 107 percent of the transformers capacity.
By 1986, this load would be 520 t-A•7 or 116 percent,of the trans-
former's capacity. This exceeds the maximum overload NSP will
allow on a transmission transformer. Any higher overload could
result in damage to the transformer.
- I
•
•
•
__. -
Kin
•
•
•
•
EXHIBIT E
•
•
DEVELOPMENTS REQUIRED WITH THIRD PARKERS LAKE
TRANSFORMER ALTERNATIVE•
•
•
Year Development_ ' ' Estimate
1986 Add a third 345-115 kv transformer at Parkers
Lake and related facilities $ 3,615,200 •
1987 Rebuild Aldrich-St Louis Park 115 kv line to
higher capacity ' $ 1,567,500
1988 Reenergize existing temporarily derated •
Parkers Lake-Blue Lake 345 kv line and
relate facilities ' $ 980,800
Build a Gleason Lake-Glen Lake-Westgate 115 kv
line and related facilities- $ 3,146,900
Rebuild existing Parkers Lake-Gleason Lake
115 kv double circuit • • $ 2,530,500
Rebuild Medicine Lake-Aldrich 115 kv line
• to higher capacity • ' $ 1,721,400
Total Investment $ 13,562,300
DEVELOPMENTS REQUIRED WITH THE EDEN PRAIRIE SUBSTATION ALTERNATIVE
Year Development ' Estimate
•
• 1986 Build an Eden Prairie Substation and related
facilities $ 3,863,700
Rebuild Aldrich-St Louis Park 115 kv line to
higher 'capacity • $ 1,464,900
1987 Rebuild Medicine Lake-Aldrich 115 kv line to .
• higher capacity ' $_1,608,700
• Total Investment $ 6,937,300 •
•
•
•
•
. -
f09_. - - - - - ..
1
•
J ;•
11 �._
r I. - j u c
• f' R.. •
. 0. L
0 •
Vi M uw -di
m
o
4 10
J ..
N Q_ o ;o F.' t:�
111
z .
• J
D —1
a .. . . .• . . . •
• 42 . . . .
..,
.. .
. .
. .>.
t .
•_ .
1
• . M
r....•
')i'
. ..
.., .
• . . ..x.r, .
d •
•
•
/A" "
J
ti •; � —� zw • ,tN �;, V
uJ u 1 CC:
�`�—_ r<t 1 I 611
y •
. it
Q UJ Ir
\_ `mil • o 'S
Q (i • e �9
a
N� • Q °� to IrU w _ _
x 1 y• J
•
•
•
0 rn 1
.. 4
1• •
.01 cn 4�
N ; to • m s
c n I � i- D� •
— ( �-\ vyi
. „ Iti [--1! • L. A'2 ,N ,— R
iw 4 _ Vii .
-% —
. •' ,1 • • . IT TA IA 1
il r/,l _ • a f, il
D ( N I,
• • I
•
7__ : . : .
• i.n .
• . :
• .
.. .. .
. . . . .
. . 7C i
1 • . . j
••
. s
h 1
Ir • ..
.
• m n i ,
Q __,E . ,
�� N o-
.4o� • z . 0
n ,- 0
n fD N .
non • D •
0 vR
7 N
r—
•. a o •
• - nn • IOW n 15Y
a
. Southwestern Twin Cities Area Load Forecast
• Load (Hh`)
S•,b 1978_ 1979_ 1980. __ 1981 19821983 1984 1985.__ 1986
F,,k _ine Lk 118.3 118.0 119.7 121.3 122.9 124.6 126.4 128.3 130.1
St Louis Pk 121.8 122.5 124.0 125.7 127.4 7.29.3 123.5 • 125.4 127.3
•
Edina 140.7 142.6 147.2 151.0 154.4 158.1 161.6 165.4 169.3
Packers Lk 43.6 44.1 45.4' 48.5 49.9 51.6 53.1 54.7 56.3
Westgate 34.9 35.8 38.3 41.2 44.3 48.0 50.2 52.6 55.1
Ryland Lk 44.3 45.3 48.0 50.4 52.9 ' 55.7 58.3 61.1 64.1
Blue Lake 11.7 13.7 14.6 15.0 15.6 16.3 . 16.8 17.3 17.8
Gleason Lk 39.3 38.8 40.1 41.4 42.7 44.2 45.8 47.4 49.1
• r
Dcephaven 18.5 19.1 21.5 . 22.3 23.1 24.0 24.7 25.4 26.2
Excelsior 41.8 11.2 10.6 10.8 11.1 11.3 11.6 11.9 12.2
Glen Lake 45_1 _ 43_7 45.0 46.4 47.8 _49.4_ 51.0 52.7 _ 54.5_
TOTAL 630.0 634.8 654.4 674.0 692.1 712.5 723.0 742.2 762.0
( Average Growth Rate 2.4%
•
• Area High Growth Substations
• 1978 _1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 •
;:estgate 34.9 35.8 38.3 41.2 44.3 • 48.0 50.2 52.6 55.1
Hyland Lk 44.3 45.3 48.0 50.4 52.9 55.7 58.3 61.1 64.1
Blue Lake 11.7- 13.7 _14.6 15.0 15.6 16.3 16.8 17.3 17.8
Gleason Lk 39.3 38.8 40.1 41.4 42.7 44.2 45.8 47.4 . 49.1
Deephaven 18.5 19.1 21.5 • 22.3 23.1 - 24.0 24.7 25.4 26.2
Excelsior 11.8 11.2 10.6 10.8 11.1 11.3 11.6 11.9 12.2
Glen take 45.1 43_7 45.0 46.4 47.8 49.4 51.0 52.7_ 54.5
TOTAL 205.0 207.6 218.1 227.5 237.5 248.9 258.4 268.4 279.0
Average Growth Rate 3.9Z
Westgate Growth Rate 5.9Z .
)
i
1
1
1
1
t
•
i
R
i
1
..---... \
i
lirci III
li-
liii \
\\,
1.,
I \
1, ,\
. 1111
i
•Is.. 11
iii!
1 till
‘1 §
i Os: V 1
1 111
b!, 111 .i;1.
1
"• II 1 1 \ 1. 11
1 111 b
i.: 1 I, '.`,,
I lli '
cp
1,1k lil it i , a.5.
tt g
I4 Ill 11 1 1
1 1 8
s .
\
it WI
.
.( '
II la \.1
.
1
i T i
. 11\
/I ,1 i1
1\
/ ‘1
P,111
IT:
Ild'
014
1
tc:
- ----"z. I
roi
— .,----—1-.:.tiltli
li 1
-.1i
i.. ..• r!!
;til__Vj
II'
'
16 1.11
1 '
ti
1 'il
f 1 11.
i 1,1:11C
—-- ______
t 1
I,
.- —.—
I.,. .,',:...,
i
15 3
— Il
`� '� �
.
� �
,
. �
`
( --_-_-__--___-'_.____--____--__-____ --_____--__ �
] '
� |
|
.
|
� �
'_
� , �
~ .
( /
|
/ � �
� �
\ �
.
| /
/ �
�. �
� 1 �
/
��' / /
|
| / � �
. � y
� , |
�i ' '
�/ �--- `
' — ! � ' |
�`�[ i � ] � )
�. �^. ��. _ - �`���. _ '______-___ _ - __-,'
| ] —'-��— '' /-�- �
� / ' ,
� ---- '--�--� — -------------� '--'-- — — |
'
'
` .
h�'U �`
/]o7
������
- - `.���,�
�
'1
�
`
|
Nk
It
~.�
( . �
. .
�
3
-- _ - - -
�l I -- - \ - -;--- \1 (
• ,\�� %=_:�� , � —_—� \\\�
, *": i \
\I'-////;�� � \ ��,——--A
•' - \\\��'
'\\II//'% ���' \\��� \\\�n
I \\\\]., /'111///"/(f ' \ --- ----------+\-- %
\ \ \': �1',
n n: �1
1\\,II II�''IIIr\\\\\\\�� \\�\ \\1\t"--'‘..1C`i\t:'..'. .-A
IIII IlliI/\\ \ I i1i111I\ IlI II1 ,i;,,::;
- 1\,111/ili'if \\III/ I li''!I II' I/I/l i//�-� ;�;�, ,;I\
i '1,, !� lI l/ /,II // I, 1Y �I ,' ,
fi\I�l.l,,l�l�l'I' /a;/;4//l/i //// ll// ► I ' 7 ,''�I1� 1\
� ' lr / / (01
m 1
T\\�,,111/1I/1►1 ,/:/I 01/1 I ' 11 i I I " I IV I i,�,,11la�
\\ II I/ 11 I \\\ 11 /Jj'I
I1 i Ili111 \\\) 1 \/11 / /� / l//- ►rIiI ///',.\^rll',$!\\
; , lu1,;l /i //y// /77'y i 11 . '' �y ;,\
vi-; \\1;11 ,\_, //,f//7,. /jam ,j I I (� f 1\+�1`', �\,,
���,1V�1�i1�l�ll �i';il;�i / I , +6\\\\A ,,;A, 1,
nl 1 i\1 1 i'l' I-'I I:t( I I •
,• , '\\ `•'' 1l
FbD- 11,.1 IT II ii;11'1;li I I • 1 \ I.+ 1i��'\\\`\\\'•111'.,‘,„\�
I_i 414v1.�411,41 'I:''I'I'vv V I i'v ) .1 vv vvv'' „\
a..
•.
.I,;V!1,;1,�iI'',l;A\\v v A \ - i °'� �1 �+ \'1\ 1
' " � r 1\ \\\\ t;�
\ :,,L,\\ \\\ \ -��,,.....1 __\./ \ .,\�\,\\ ,;n'
i ' ''1\l'� ':A.,',I„:, \\vw —Ni --.vv / — "\V1 "\ 'v','
- "..- I ri'l\'''\''' ' ''.--- --'-'-.---\\\\\--'/ \ 1 \ ' 'I ''' \' '1.1'
I 1.'-1 't1\ \\ \ \\,`..��\�\\ \ •♦'� •N.'i C\\� \` \ \ . I 1 \1.`', 1111
l
y
•1
.' `t
1I \\A /
i;!i/Jl/,�,/� IVY ,,,
/ q.''Ir I /1, tt e
� I./ ',''.11, ‘ ,
i [, ;'r•I ,
, ff :
\ \ /1\ \
IN,11 f� \ l !\ ,
_ .--\•'!,,,,,..\\\`'‘-..-.; :,'- -27.:\\V6\\\ \
klll 11. - \\';'•r's' 1\fli 'fit ;�..,—j
tVi t\
ijills , /' �h11''`'��
l ' rr
I / ''11\I\ � \ ,`\'' 1�
i` �
i \I1I1 !i '
I \ ,
l \III, I 1�'1 . ',
1
I I II l I j /
h ,l 1 1
\ I
/ :
).
1 it 4
ii
•
.;
i e .•.
ti
1
I \ \
\\\ \ 1
. I
/ • -0----- L:----..:Ne ,
,_-:•--1-e...,°--,--- --c"-- ,,,,% i
,
\
\ \\..yi '
. , •
i.Iltitt IV'21i.i.1,1).ii:j.1,11,71:11:1 1/ /11/:;'_/_._./.)!:/.k!'7/,\\I„N,,\.,,II'\III\.\\11\1:1,11'.'111-\'‘\;.„...,4 \Ai\ ..\\:\\‘,\\.
• 1 .
1
• i v(;.i, ,//,/,---. ,,\\\1/4,\\\i, - ‘ '.. ' !
i .
1411)111111'1\ \
1.,;T•tl.'• \
c If.11),1\\\\V, --- • -,-.7, \\\$\.\ '
c• \ t ., i
,. • ,‘ ,, lc. ,. •
•l'ii \ Vi \\.,,,•5•TAI. t i
T\\\\\\\1 1\ ,
I I, ''',.i)5
4\110\\,\ ..,
ll
' "It.
\ ,
I -
\\I\IL... ___„..„.--.--,_!_,/////',
----F-L': — : -../,,,,,y-.; I
(r8i -. .
I / (,)
Ir -- -
•,,, ‘•,:j
-i !-•7 r71 - - • - ,1
‘ i"d!II
4' : •!, 1.j 1.51.:',1•!!1 '
':• .,: .:;i i'l 1:-2.. :I.' '
r ' :
• , . ,
, .
. .. ,
•
i
I
' ,
i NSi
psi n, n n; f 1
o
z. x t
w N
i 1 i , \ i- .
1 1 • 0
t li _T
"I i .- i III i t. 3r
t 1
`
i i... 1 -.:
1
11 m —VS
i ,_:
.J 1
A;1 'i
.-.. t�LI.- I.
I.I . i t t
•
) I
::: ,'
ti li • j 1
sl ;i itr
157°) -
•
j JJi. 11 f
i 4 t.1 1 Ns t ! I t t F f t
m
. -- m / 1,13
I i.
.
! }i
s �, k. i ,_ r
t I r
y,,
1
• / . ' 4 ! z , . . i 4,
47-5 L •
I _ F
v is. gat
i'( 1
1
i r 1
j { f
i `
i
N
•
i'
3
' sI,:
kl _t {
lks :
_ _—__--
1
Is
... .
,
11 13
it
111 ,
•
..f
( i
i •
\ .
1
\ ,
\ 1
i
1 . •
• 1
I ,
, 1
•I
.....,,, i
. II
.. .A ;1
• 11. I
.1! . . 1 1...,..„ . 1
1-r--- I
:;._..............:1 I i .1
--
.
•'''\'‘72. 11 i
'-'1, :- 1:.:-.1.T7I-. 1
1 11.- 1. ''.• t 11 -7I'1
i-((.,.-- . 1. ( ' i E---7-1--: ' i..V.Z.......L._....- 1 .
. ._. .
. '1 q• .
1.2
'.I
•
r•F::- .• ,
1-; -
• '1. • i
'..._..
_ 1•
i ]
••1-1 • ; i 'l';'• '
1 . -
1‘,1 i:FT
,..... ......• . - •- :----
Irr....-.
1.',. l•
III.I. _ILI
; -..
1 .
i I
I 6G) '
i
\
', i •
\ \: 1
-.E. f11
-..i1.
.,.
'1 }
I. I
—IJ
4: i��_
1 t_
——1:-•.:1,1 flii Ill .1 1
I r
,.1
i
\— s
111 ) 1
l';'r i''i l'-'1 c
1..
-i
I6S
•
MEMO
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: June 9, 198D
SUBJECT: Right-of-way Acquisition from MN/DDT
1.C. 51-311
MN/DOT is in the process of final design and right-of-way acquisition for
the permanent signal project on T.H. 169 at Co. Rd. 1. A small triangular
portion of Outlot A, Yorkshire Point, as shown on the attached drawing, is
needed as right-of-way for certain drainage work which will be included in
the project. The State is also acquiring access control from T.H. 169 for
all of said Outlot A.
The City owns Outlot A and MN/DDT has offerred to acquire said right-of-way
( from the City for the sum of $2,500. We can use this payment as an offset
against our costs for providing a temporary signal onplace at Co. Rd. 1/T.H.
169.
Recommend that the Council authorize the Mayor and Clerk to accept MN/DOT'S
offer of $2,5DD for said portion of Outlot A, Yorkshire Point.
CJJ:kh
169 qq
•
),..CV
y�
n° a Minnesota Department of Transportation
Ar Transportation Building. St.Paul,MN 55155
OF TPA'
Phone612-296-3241
The City of Eden Prairie
Mayor
City Hall
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
In reply refer to: 360
S.P. No. 2744 (169=5-31-1) *57-095
County Hennepin - State Funds
Parcel 314C Owner The City of Eden Prairie
Property Address T.H. 169, Eden Prairie, MN
Property Description See attached description
The State hereby submits to you an offer of $ 2,500.00 , which
amount is its appraised fair market value of the above referenced property
and/or certain rights therein, disregarding any change in the before value
of the property caused by the proposed highway improvement. If less than
your total property is being acquired, $ None of the above
amount is considered to be damages to your remaining property.
The various conditions upon which the State's appraisal of fair market
t value are based are contained in the instrument marked "Exhibit A" attached
hereto and made a part of this letter. Also attached is a legal description
of the property and/or rights to be acquired.
You will have a reasonable length of time to consider the offer. To aid in
your decision you may wish to secure your own appraisal. Minnesota law
provides for reimbursement by the State in an amount not to exceed $300.00
for the actual cost of an appraisal. Reimbursement cannot be made, however,
until your property is acquired. Attached to this letter is a claim form
for use in requesting reimbursement.
Minnesota law also provides that the owner and/or occupants of property
being acquired will be reimbursed for the actual cost of moving personal
property and fur certain incidental costs incurred by the property owner
in transferring title to the State. Claim forms and instructions for applying
for reimbursement will be furnished when the property is acquired.
If you decide to accept the State's offer, the parcel will be acquired by
direct purchase and you will be paid upon satisfactory evidence of merchantable
title. If the offer is unacceptable you may have your property acquired in
an eminent domain proceedings. The purchasing agent who delivers this
letter will furnish a booklet "Minnesota Highways and your Property" in
which the methods of acquisition are described. He will be pleased to dis-
cuss
any questions you may have.
An Equal Opportunity Employer
a.
. 4 L `(/ f G.. 0• Y;:
2ri .. 1 ,I !• h ----_' 1,1-, .;may ' .:) ..
'
,-,•/,', -1•‘<2. •" .. ,,,_\\--,... .i: ...._-__-,„,•• - - • - )'',
•
P.J. I c i i'� 1� -� �+ " `!�• '1 j"S 11%-` / �'
L ,1i__ _� T N. • •- t: .t .y ,� - -- -.`-`� `• . .,^�-•-�, • \
IA j
4 Q . .T . .._.-, 1 t • 1 �'111`l,`V`,o•,v. n..•., 2,11 Ve4�i C, ^
h BSiT E R . '� �r ' ,
f a. ,J /�! jj r
94 cj Pa. ru;e P -41 Z /
p s E r o P,�,c;� - tt ,
•'G 'S� io 1. 1. 'C
' ./` '!i f \' t ' ./ a r
•
1 ;t. J ,/ ��_ I f f •/ I�.`\ . ' I I.-• . 1��L.- _ ;i
•
MEMO
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: June 9, 1980
SUBJECT: Petition - Hilltop Road Improvements
I.C. 51-3B0
The attached petition has been received requesting street improvements on
Hilltop Road west of County Rd. 4. The majority of abutting property owners
have indicated a favorable response to option No. 1. Municipal sewer and
water service are not presently available for extension to this area.
It is recommended that the Council receive this petition and adopt Resolu-
tion No. R8-117, ordering preparation of a feasibility report by the City
Staff.
CJJ:kh
Attachment
! l
F �
'(
•
June 17, 1980
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
( HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R80-117
RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND ORDERING •
FEASIBILITY REPORT ON IMPROVEMENTS (I.C. 51-380)
WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed to make
the following improvements:
I.C. 51-380, Street and drainage improvements
on Hilltop Road.
and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the
improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 419.011 to 429.111.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council:
That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer
for study and that"a feasibility report shall be prepared and
presented to the City Council with all convenient speed advising
the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment
and feasibility at the proposed improvements.
. ADOPTED •t ' the Eden Prairie City Council on
•
iJo-l(gang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
•
•
1,
•
a
- Iqo
vt it 6 17 7)/,
V't C2 1•C• (^)'-2)5°
l 0./25/79
Because of the a;aount of oast and the condition of Hilltop Road within just a few
days after the road grader goes by, I aixi inquired about the options for having
something done to upgrade the road. The following information Via obtained from
City Hall. What are your feelings about having something done to the road? Please
write your cog=rents and pr.ss on to the next person on the list. Thanks.
John Hansen
ill Good Road: 6" agrigate base, 2" bituminous, storm sewer & catch basins,
sodding & top soil - 69,000 to 00,000. Lasts about 17 years.
$20 par foot per side (100-foot lot would cost :2,000)
#2 Shaping up wiat is here for the base and put 2" bituminous surface, paving
without drainage. City Engineer does not recornend going this route. Lasts
3 to 5 years. Cost is about $17,000 or w5 per foot per side.
v:ith storm drainage, S34,000, or about 0.0 per foot per side.
#3 Seal Coating: 2 coats of oil and gravel. Same as Cedar Ridge Road across from
City Hall. Also on Sunrise Circle, north of Pioneer Trail before you get to
the airport ball fields. Lasts 2 or 3 years. City Engineer does not redor.:::nd.
Cost is approximately W. per foot per side (100-foot lot e.ould be about $100).
Please put your phone number by your name. C0L2.iNTS '
1. XiikWi 3 / /
!..-,. 0,1p2,-, ol<,M,:,.....vci() ,.,,i .t.."-e, i
2. Rraasch f ,alV- 1--41-4C. /
3. �- /7-7CfV7 --14'iPla. • ?-i-i•7_,,j
-on,-i.enny .„. ' _�py�, a
4• C12rt
. / -d-;* ilj(__-)- f- Z V I I
5. Scheibe I j'+.e- 9,,ne- Q 1 I 'q
• 937 -3035
7. -Grover - — - --.
8. Cronin f A aZ1r7 .,./
n Kruse ! ✓ V
S 710. 7, .�
?- yri,,>s<r_,,.\1�, l(a 1r4 !-};Ilan 1-Z' L. . _ 9, 7- 8 9-8
11. J e r oj4r 1 , 'e 3,eR ;
12. LcGc/ern
13. Nicholson 1fr 'c 3 0-4-K "—'--`--
i 11
---- -.------------- -- __fit / .�
14. Nelson
I lVvr �61t 3
!3)- as 3 i ., (✓'._ . .
15. Harrison Q\
16. Reithermann f .',.- . -tJ ( ) /2 ? --
- /- 1� C//:
17. Syl-cinder Cr; MG r6 �
,
18. Barth k -- '
2 ,
TIC k:c.• �•. �h -' P_frren_�r a�h
19. Rivkin ( �� u2 '''i `yam •� ___.
20. Yerkes f Z 3 u3
1600
•
_/ • ---)". . .
.., r, ..
•. rr \ .
lis . • •
1 • 1.
-— --------.------- ••:.
i ..., _____.__---..--.•..--.-•• 2...7:.•'..4 b•••••• j!...”%
,.. -•.-----------05J 7:5 •' 1,1. " .;4...* 1
c - • T
es cs
GO '.:.,.,..4 ',7,.... ....•ri s.. 5. ...,
. .... to I 0 .....,...: .
•;;:. ... ---- ----- -- -4 _ I.\
CD AL 4 •-- . - --. —-. --
N ••- • a'.1 I.1
• t•—• .4 .: il• .7, 7r
- rr 0., • .
,... -cs. ••• •-• 11
- i LS 1 US'',,; x •...." , I
re, 1 • .
...A .. .
3> . .. :
-
- - . .., E.....
,-, -:. .2_, 0 •
: r e 0 . ,7"), •-•,. r 7 9 , ••- ' - ,.t z I
rn , ••. -i • -iv, (-••• .7.: ' -.4 C.."` •,. n, ,
ls . .T.,, .-• ; ..J ' rri
coo' 9 1.
P • .....•
1
13 :
___ 47214
e:".-....
.--„,
ta
---———1:r- —-——4:2•.•1 0 -• "...-.•w,,; ' 4'._.• I; ' tru:0)
..---.
5, •..;•••:i
••::,--,/,I,„ • , .;.:1
1
( . 1 f',4 ----' •
is, ......
1 . ..
1 zz s•-:••-••••,., ---„....,------7.------ ! z-.^...
IJI Cr
. )1' • s''-`% .:_=., .;
, ...., •T•
t• . . .....1
. -- ... •
, m — c2, .... •,
.k CA • C./7 "•••••
•P —e % P ,
s...„. ,
1: CI 43' .
I-, '
, . •. • ..,_,I• ti
...... i --- .1 7.-) ,..._ ---. -- •— - — ,c---- --
, '- 0 '------0-
. 1-..
1 l',•:•.. 7> icy;.'`,... \ Q
-4 •.
. fr.., .
....J .'
t•
••
• ----..-- ! ---
I --- -----or-.
... 1
c. I- ,-•• SI .,•-•,
co
..• -I,, N <13i' . , ' ......, .
.... ..._, 1 ....., t 2. . ._.. ..... ....... ..
1 ---- 4-3.:,:t
. •4..s.)
• 44-0 • ,P.,' • .,. .-.
...N."........ . ..
....... !--..... ,,,, . .i
-I
i _.---
r•-•
.._.--------- ... ... ....- - ------ --C N CJ
',.....,.. 1
ts t •. II .
.****••••••,.. 1..'''' r•I., r....7%
•
•• , 'I '
2.,••• tv . . •
'`,..„,,,, .. %.•• r•is"; t4 cic‘..'?, t.- ....... i n ••:--
,ri)‘i .".............., l'!. ....
111-7-.±:";:f
,..,
. ROAD •
..55.Rod. _______---- ------------":12'A.•
.••• 254 21
,z.....
..., .....,
. k •iePOI .k-
. ..
•
•
MEMO
•
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
OATE: June 9, 1980
SUBJECT: Petition for Sewer Service
Flying Cloud Orive and. Willow Creek Road
I.C. 51-382
The attached petition has been received requesting sanitary sewer service
at the corner of Flying Cloud Drive and Willow Creek Road. Both trunk
sewer and water lines are available for extension of laterals to this
area and it is suggested that both utilites be investigated.
Recommend that the Cduncil receive this petition and order a feasibility
report be prepareed by the City Staff.
CJJ:kh
Attachments
a.
•
•
June 17, 1980
CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA E.
RESOLUTION NO. R80-118
RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION ANO ORDERING
FEASIBILITY REPORT ON IMPROVEMENTS ( I.C. 51-382)
has been received and it isproposed to make
WHEREAS, a petition
the following improvements:
I.C. 51-382, Sewer and water improvements
on Flying Cloud Drive and Willow Creek Rd.
and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost-of the
improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council:
That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer
for study and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and pre-
sented
to the City Council with all convenient speed advising
the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assess-
ment and feasibility of the proposed improvements.
AOOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
•
•
/603
•
•
•
CITY,OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
•
•
To The Eden Prairie City Council:
The undersigned property owners herein petition the Eden Prairie City
Council to consider making the following described improvements(s):
(Ge ralLc) ation)
•
X Sanitary Sewer �/Vi..#2 1 N/ ,Z/ /6/11
Watermain ?.efieLiC4'
Storm Sewer
Street Paving
Other '
•
Street Address or Other
Legal Description of Names of Petitioners
Property to be Served Must Be Pro erty �e •
4. 7/90 t/y�� o 0 •
•
(For City Use) 1
Date Received
n i
Project No.
Council Consideration
i/ril
' ". ..
-ri !
.
frii 0 .
'•:
3• \,_ . • . •-•••.
kn
• l• r..
1 i •-
• r. ' 4.e....
(9.9:- ) .0 rdod I ....
....
: •
tr,•
•
_. _. .... .......
ED
e IV'
i •
• 47::
'%__.;...
--•-• •--.....
N4 '
---•- —_.
I •,,, , ,
• • .. --— '--.C.P.L. .
> .
2 P.
N ; ---• ._ ._.
0,
,07 t 0
.r,
•Pp / utd
0-,
-
••., . Oa.- I
i
a
- i
-------..„.......,..............L..........L:::........... — -.:. •••, ..... •
.C 't,', .ar-• :.",/
pi-2
--..._
4+
I
------------------- --ii----...„----;9,. •-. , .•,,,, 1
. tr/i'l .r.....--...,,.....,
r:.3.
r./ .
r.-•‘..o.
et
Cr. . .
5...-_,4/.
/
a../ ix'. ,,,, •
, ;3z • itill1111 0- k)
1/..„1-e.ji-ra.me g'`ic kill ,.4g....% k, •i ,
, . .• ,,
1.0 *
„,.,.... . ci Am& ..1....1 . ,4 ..,..;
:, ••• ----Nit ....,
\ '..t.
• \ -,;.- ' ce -; -,,, . ..,
- ,
.5\ 4* ..• __._.
?-1 Z.'„ --<>0 ..; .• , ,t.-;,. fq' .
cts Z- -4, T„, ..-- -...o..•
•,-;.,-.'— s 7 .is 02 ff. cork —T-- . - o -----k, .i., ,4 ,.-‘ ..• •Ar ,--.
t - to • 405--.2 • •=1---. ,.. ., . / !
! 6-,.. „ :' . ' • ',. 1.
I es tO
— ‘ .... c. •
1 .Z
V.
_ n.• 't .— • ' : ":4 gl ' :
,
"It 0 ..— ...01...\
.‘
\ ... k....
17. .01' .1
1 \ oaf 0 rt• '. . 0 i.
. i ..,,,01 I •,,\‘ ,..‘':... ••....% ...Z
, .
t: .r-717-....:L:?0AD .. "
‘ ,F-,•., ,•. 47'..'•5.'I •. . , '")" 1
1 ti
i 1:;; 1 .• '• \ ‘ ••• , /
;•4;;.;-/*-4,- ./.., ...
•;I;;A,.:•,:.,..,u.-..-*.I,,-
3''-..7•1f•I a);sCREEK
f-" nr.-...,',..11ri57ti 4," •
, \\ KAK-i1 A--5.„.•'0. -.;..`.-.:.. •'t1'•_6, ,
'
w E th _- , ___ _
r-
c.‘.„_...
c.__'..••.-.•,• !111!
G - •' . . .1 1
;•1 n, - 4 . ,-
,:"., '.....s..• N. .‘ ' !ft' ... 40,..!,,0,‘'a , „,...--
‘i , r•
7..),,y•', ,- ...,". _ '
...
irli,Cs k
. . . \
[. . -
. ..._.
I :1;1: • ,
.1.7) '''•
1•
4 li
a•
j
,
1/4.
t,
Z.i
; Al;
1 " •
. . ,`•c i'fr—
. •
. 1 4
• ! ,:--;
i
x;
1 ‘...,
,...
•
. .--• „ !... ' ? .
.... ......:
I ......_........,..., .
•
•.-5...,€.0 r I
• .-.--......-.7 c,Th,-.-7..__26,..................._'... c•0 c s 1,
4 .
..
• .
!
1 I
. i
• . ...., •
1 , .. .
. • ...,. .
I:1 1.....
) :"I -.-.• . _ . ,, L, I .
----___•,..... •
- I
cc' *trs l•-•
(' —e• ---,
,C) t ..r--- 0.•I wx.„.....r.______ .
.,1*.-4.,.., • ,„ :,-,,:::,‘
... -'-:• .Z. ,s !-.. .... 1
., ...."1. to ,..Q •....--I
\ :'''''''"•:. 'S'l\•••'
. Ct.
41T
. , A 17., to' Z • r
' ''' • •••.:.0', ' S:S.,a l...,
I. • 1 1C ::::c\"'_ \
• ex . ..'`Z- ''', 1 1.4.11 -
v- • .<1 t . : • LA.: '.
to. . -L's 1,....,,N-,...., -,,. •f c4.• . = .
— .• n .4., o "3.; 0. '‘.., . •rt.-.„_...
•,11 ..' 1 • ... - ae-•••• > •-• ') • -......... , . >,'
•.'li e•ib.•°' .. \'`.• '.• .3? 2‘C '';`
I • C.1
•il '' ‘‘ . '.•''• ''' •
..1.) i• t.' ti :.: = >4
St.
1 i 51 ' ... 1 •..* 10..,
-1:.;)" .....-••• ;•1 ••!
.- ! Oa i • =1
AD I 6' T',. •'• 's• ' in ''', 6 0:i!
-----41- 1'i•g'i' ''.` . • I'-')c•• j'.s ' • . 1 5.' 'I''
. c•-; 4'''"/::i
- ".. • t52
/•
,
, •1, 1 ›,.. ci
is ...-_,
—
I "
, .....J .-'
! . ..
I, ,-,...
:•• ‘ .' i
. .!..44 .
'.... ..\•• ''''' 1
• : L. .
.•••••'• ,... ,
4 • i‘90(° ..._ .. .
,........----' •
. 4 ,
3
� !x,: Y�y. lop ' r{,apN. j •
i ;,: .,..,.. .,,i
—.�tr I 1 ec��d , .
3RD`ADDri"' '4- :'•e'," jiy 1
— - ., ._ // t:.---�r::SxD1 kl' f an,,,t.4.• t_'
V I.'..
z i€' ^'- 1.01 YslFF.ri SON
i; I A , ., 1 ...4i; (', 1
. '•. `!l'.1 i— • _ _.r_5 [.!. ` • , Ir If yt'i }I r A,
J l I \ �� 4� 4�,, i • _:.{ ."L1KFt G:..r R -'
•
- ;.'••• t:,1-r
:„,...C:::3.E:1-4--Irril ' d fr-.. ,\ ...... • .,„ :.,-,-,„_,.k--7.
ii 1f6a Kr ;� :L� • f F?aRc .E
• ��_ t Y=rc +�rssIulr.-rain. :3i�;' sa 9,� r� a; w
L....._
StiCHOEr.FE D R+:. ^S "BR{A RFIEL ?+ , .
., ;:, - : .
•
, I 7:-‘) ..,..i,"_,,,,-- .N .,,4: 7*-C.-_,,,:s.-.;:,..1i.:.'.t-->;r:7,--:..71-;;
. Au
1 , i • r (- , ,'A%� _
i f•'''• n
). >,I .,�� ' �"'If �N'S l .f `YZ�'I QR�E 1 A I D
.a:c ,4&;ii(
,{ •J ,ri(
if . -. 2 -1-r
iiI ...... ..........,II
` ;;
<<;
'�v if IND f j
, l IND
J\ •. _ `
` ........
•
I o'7
i
June 17, 1980
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R80-116
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS
(I.C. 51-341)
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 20th day
of May, 1980, fixed the 17th day of June, 1980, as the date for a public
hearing on the following proposed improvements: i
I.C. 51-341, Stree11, utility and pathway
improvements along Anderson Lakes Parkway
from Preserve Blvd. to T.H. 169.
WHEREAS, all property owners whose property is liable to be
assessed for the making of this improvement were given ten days published
notice of the Council hearing through two weekly publications of the re-
quired notice and the hearing was held and property owners heard on the
17th day of June, 1980;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
Such improvement is hereby ordered.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on
Wol-fgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
IGOX
i
June 17, 1980
STT,_ OF MINNESOTA
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The followir _accounts were audited and allowed as follows:
1860 PETTY CASH Expenses $ 66.37
1861 VOID OUT CHECK
1862 TWIN CITY WINE CO. Wine 105.25
1863 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR Liquor • 1,245.53
1864 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. Liquor 2,026.64
1865 OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. Wine 645.99
1866 BUTCH'S BAR SUPPLY Supplies-Liquor store 168.80
1867 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. Liquor 726.45
1868 MINNESOTA DISTILLERS, INC. Liquor 1,290.40
1869 RAWHIDE RANCH MEATS Meats-Liquor store 131.33
1870 PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL ASSOCIATES Rent-Liquor store 1,904.13
1871 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. Wine 192.92
1872 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE Liquor 1,634.69
1873 MRPA TEAM REGISTRATION Registration-Rec dept 81.00
1874 KRIS STETTER Petty cash fund-Round Lake Beach 25.00
1875 ED SORENSEN Conference-Water dept 306.00
1876 ATLANTA MARRIOTT HOTEL Conference-Water dept 342.00
18/' PAUSTIS & SONS Wine 205.9?
18t�. TWIN CITY WINE CO. Wine 291.64
1879 ED. PHILLIPS & SONS CO. Liquor 1,594.29
1880 VOID OUT CHECK
1881 OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. Liquor 1,294.04
1832 MIDWEST WINE CO. Wine 366.10
1833 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. Liquor 1,672.64
18S4 AUTO SPECIALTIES E-Z Key Kit-Public safety 14.95
1835 BEER WHOLESALERS, INC. Beer 3,760.00
1886 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO, INC. Beer 31.60;
1837 COCA-COLA BOTTLING MIDWEST INC. Mixes 427.10
1888 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. Beer 3,149.37 '
1889 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO. Beer 3,918.9/
1890 GOLD MEDAL BEVERAGE CO. Mixes 142.Bc
1891 LEDING DISTRIBUTING CO. Beer 2,867.60
1892 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO. Mixes 234.50.
1893 ROUILIARD BEVERAGE CO., INC. Beer 1,597.09'
1891 TFIORPE DISTRIBUTING CO. Beer 5,503.15
1895 TWIN CITY PRICING & LABEL INC. Supplies-Liquor store 175.95
1896 CURTIS M. BFRGQUIST Fireman 800.00
1897 RONALD T. BURKE Fireman 190.00
1898 LANCE BRACE Fireman 366.D0
1899 DUANE D. CABLE Fireman 394.00
i.
1900 JAMES GORDON CLARK Fireman 586.0(.'
1901 SPENCER CONRAD Fireman 394.0i
19,' WALLACE CONRAD Fireman 346.04
190., LARRY ALAN DOIG Fireman 426.0,
1904 PATRICK S. DAM' Fireman 334.0'
1905 JOHN K[NNLTH FIACKING Fireman 608.0!
190C, FREDRICK FIAFFNER Fireman 756.0r
190/ STEVEN HAHNEELOT Fireman 416.0(
10()
Pag( Rio
June; 17, 1980
1908 JOHN JOSEPH HOBBS Fireman 254.00
1909 JOHN THOMAS HOBBS Fireman 554.00
1910 GENE A. JACOBSON Fireman 1,190.00
1911 DUANE LEWIS JOHNSON Fireman 384.00
1912 RONALD 0. JOHNSON Fireman 610.00 •
1913 MARVIN A. LAHTI Fireman 612.00
1914 M.E. LANE JR. Fireman 580.00
1915 ROBERT PAUL LISTIAK Fireman 640.00
1916 LOWELL D. LUND Fireman 1,032.00
1917 JAMES L. MATSON Fireman 628.00
1918 TERRENCE FRANCIS MCKILLIP Fireman 268.00
1919 RAY I. MITCHELL Fireman 1,752.00
1920 THOMAS HAMILTDN MONTGOMERY Fireman 628.00
1921 BERNARD F. NEUMANN Fireman 560.00
1922 CURTIS REED OBERLANDER Fireman 936.00
1923 MARTIN L. PAULSEN Fireman 474.00
1924 DOUGLAS LEE PLEHAL Fireman 968.00
1925 ,JERALD FRED PRODOEHL Fireman 708.00
1926 MICHAEL ROGERS Fireman 406.00
1927 NORBERT HENRY ROGERS Fireman 860.00 i.
1928 CHARLES SCHAITBERGER Fireman 792.00
1929 HARVEY H. SCHMIDT Fireman 356.00
193 GERALD M. SCHWANKL Fireman 1,212.00
1931 JOHN JOSEPH SKRANKA Fireman 772.00
1932 EUGENE RAYMOND SPANDE Fireman 478.00
1933 VERNON THOMAS STEPPE Fireman 630.00
1934 BURTON LEE SUTTON Fireman 946.00
1935 MARC LEWIS THIELM1AN Fireman 894.00
1936 RICHARD W. TURNER Fireman 440.00
1937 STEPHEN JOHN WHITE Fireman 740.00
1938 MARILYN F. MITCHELL Records keeper-Fire dept 350.00
1939 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Payroll 6/6/80 12,462.79
194D AETNA LIFE INSURANCE & ANNUITY CO Payroll 6/6/80 205.00
1941 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS Payroll 6/6/80 29.50
1942 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING Dues 22.00
1943 PERA Payroll 6/6/BO 9,101.76
1944 DUANE JAMES CABLE Landfill fire 98.00
1945 TERRENCE FRANCIS MCKILLIP Landfill fire 138.00
1946 JOHN DAVID RIEGERT Fireman 496.00'
1947 STAN RIEGERT Fireman 1,042.00 '
1948 AAA SCAVENGER CO. Septic tank cleaned-City Hall 75.0v 1
1949 ACRO-MIN1ESOTA, INC. Office supplies 72.04
1950 ACTION RENTAL CENTER Raft rental-Round Lake, Grinder rental-Water 42.50
dept
1951 ADVANCE AMBULANCE & EQUIPMENT Basket stretcher-Fire dept 142.20
1952 AIR AUTOMATION EQUIPMENT Couplers for air hose-Fire & Public Works Bldg 35.30
1951 ALDY GRAPHIC SUPPLY, INC. Scales, lead, eraser, pencils, lead holder- 66.64
Community services
1954 ALL STEEI PRODUCTS CO., INC. Culverts-Topview Park 9?4.63
1955 AMERICAN LIGHTING PRODUCTS CO Light bulbs-Fire & Public Works Bldg 138.76
1956 AMiRICAN NATIONAL BANK & TRUST Bond Payment 87,812.73
1957 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION Bouk-Engineering dept 16.0i
1958 EARL F. ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Heavy/d1uty swing-Park dept 4,406.0u;
. /b/V Y rt_roi:r dt-cr,-
a
°df}!K 'wee
June 17, 1980
1959 ARMOR LOCK & SAFE CO. Alarm system rental-Senior Citizen 82.50
1960 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT CO., INC. Equipment repair & parts-Street dept 32.42 S
1961 AUTOTRAAC Speed test on squad cars 21.00
1962 AWARDS, INC. Supplies-Rec dept 314.05
1963 RAE BLY Mileage 25.50
1964 LES BRIDGER Expenses 29.62 '
1965 BROWN PHOTO Film-Fire dept 103.00
1966 BURNER SERVICE & COMBUSTION Boiler repair-Water dept 304.00
1967 CASE POWER & EQUIPMENT Equipment rental-Community development 1,212.24
1968 CHANHASSEN AUTO PARTS Equipment repairs & parts 486.15
1969 CHAPIN PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal ads 125.49
1970 CHEMLAWN Lawn application-Water dept 193.00
1971 CONSOLIDATED TREE COMPANY Tree removal 185.00
1972 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. Tape, pencils 94.79
1973 CURLE PRINTING COMPANY, INC. Business cards-Building dept 30.00
1974 CUTLER MAGNER COMPANY Quicklime-Water dept 1,569.29
1975 WARO F. DAHLBERG Mileage 9.88
1976 DALCO Cleaning supplies, line painter-Comm Service 743.60
1977 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO Water meters-Water dept 151.80
1978 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY Portable spot light-Water dept 492.28
1979 DORHOLT PRINTING & STATIONERY Office supplies 208.42
1980 DOWN TO EARTH Transplant trees 560.00
198( EDEN PRAIRIE ENGRAVERS Engraved Commission Award Plaques 70.20
1982 EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS Legal ads 501.89
1983 EDEN PRAIRIE SANITATION Service 60.50
1984 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS Rings-Park dept 23.00
1985 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. Storm sewer catch basin 312.00
1986 FIRE INSTRUCTOR'S ASSN. OF MINN Dues-Fire dept 5.00
1987 FIRE SAFETY & COMMUNICATIONS Air pac press regulator & 50 ft hose 576.45
1988 FLAHERTY EQUIPMENT CORP Points, condenser for air cleaner 26.68
1989 FOX, MCCUE & MURPHY Audit 6,558.50
1990 FRONTIER LUMBER & HARDWARE Wood for dam at Hidden Ponds, lumber-Park 255.89
1991 G.L. CONTRACTING, INC. Repair water pipe leak-Mitchell Rd & Research 950.28
Road
1992 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Equipment repair & parts 35.05
1993 GLIDDEN PAINT Paint for soccer fields ' 72.00
1994 DALE GREEN CO. Maintenance material 84.85
1995 GROSS INDUSTRIAL SERVICES Service 55.34
1996 HACH CHEMICAL COMPANY Laboratory turbidimeter tests- Water dept 1,284.81
1997 C.F. HAGLIN & SONS CO Refund on license 25.00
1993 TED HALMRAST Refund-Rec dept 12.00
1999 HENNEPIN COUNTY Radio-Police dept 355.84
2000 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL CENTERS Tuition-Fire dept 50.00
7001 HI-FI SOUND ELECTRONICS Microphone-Rec dept 118.90
2002 HOPKINS DODGE SALES, INC. Equipment repair & parts 623.37
2003 HOPKINS PARTS CO. Air filters, seals, plugs, hose, muffler. 258.34
200a HOPKINS PRINT SHOP, INC. Season pass forms printed-Rec dept 13.30
20G INGRAM EXCAVATING • Haul rock & blackdirt-Valley View Rd & 2,368.00
Senior Citizen--,
2006 J & R RADIATOR CORP `-(Fadietor repair-Street dept 101.34
2007 IVAN JOHNSON Softball official 11.00
2003 KLN JOHNSON PRINTING, INC. Safety cards-Police dept 15.00
161(
•
•
•
Page four
June 17, 1980
2009 KARULF HARDWARE, INC. Putty knife, plastic cement, bulbs-City Hall 817.69
keys, padlocks, varnish, stain, brushes, screws
bolts, hinges, clamps-Police dept, clear plastic,
wax, fittings-Fire dept, concrete mix, bolts &
nuts, drainage, lights-Street dept, drill, bolts
& nuts, varnish, paint, spray, padlocks-Park
dept, rope-Reforestation, grass seed, hoses,
sprinkler, velcro, nails, pails, insect repellant
2010 DARRELL KEIM Softball official 11.00
2011 AMY KOHNKE Refund-Rec dept 8.00
2012 KRAEMER'S HOME CENTER Concrete mix, sand mix, pipe, anchors, 639.61
chain-April & May purchases
2013 LAHASS MFG & SALES, INC. Tool box-Tree disease dept 225.00
2014 AL LARSON Expenses 25.72
2015 LEEF BROS., INC. Service 124.40
2016 MIRA LEVIE Refund-Rec dept 8.00
2017 LOWELL LUND Expenses 42.02
2018 LUTZ TREE SERVICE INC Tree removal 55.00.
2019 MCFARLANES, INC. Service 48.00
207, METHODIST HOSPITAL Suction tubes 60.00
202r METRO PRINTING, INC. Forms 124.00
2022 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Book-Planning dept 1.00
2023 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION Blacktop 476.41
2024 MIKE'S GLENROSE FLORAL Flowers 23.50
2025 MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY • Service 34.71
2026 MINNESOTA VALLEY GAS COMPANY Fuel-Senior Citizens Bldg. 272.80
2027 MINNETONKA COMMUNITY SERVICES Service 100.00
2028 MODERN TIRE CO. Equipment repair & parts 27.00'
2029 MUNICIPAL & PRIVATE SERVICES, INC. Service 625.00
2030 MURPHY PLUMBING & HEATING Valve for hot water heater-Water dept 9.50 '
2031 MELANIE MUSLANSKI Refund-Rec dept 2.00 's
2032 NATIONAL' CITY BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS Bond payment 35,248.14L
2033 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY Service 5.76
2034 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY Service 3,809.19`
2035 NORTHRUP KING CO. Seed-Parks dept 2,903.20'
2036 NORTHWESTERN BELL Service 2 243.09
2037 NORTHWESTERN NATL BK OF MPLS Bond Payment," '"% c 316,055. 1
2038 PETTY CASH-PUBLIC SAFETY Expenses IZ.b3
2039 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN Lawn mower 1,400.001
2040 JOSEPH PUFAHL Refund-Rec dept 28.00i
2041 JIM RESCH Golf classes 950.00j
2042 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOCIATES Service-Industrial Rd Utilities, City 48,538.12
Garage survey, 168th Ave. Develop, Round 1
Lake Utilities, High Trails Sewer & Water
' Valley View Road, Round Lake Park Redesign,
Shady Oak Ind. Park, Shady Oak Extension,
Cardinal Creek Estates, Norseman Ind. Park 4th
addition, Cardinal Creek-Phase II
2043 ROBERTS LITHO, INC. Sumner Leisure Program printed 681.001
• /6f2 .
I.
Page five .
Jug( 17, 1980
2044 KURT ROMSOS Refund-Rec dept 1.0' f
2045 SA1ELLITE INDUSTRIES, INC. Portable restrooms 1,756.20
2046 JIM SCHIMELPFENIG Softball official 11.00 ,
2047 SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. Service-Chatham Woods 8,327.13 I
2048 SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. Welder-Water dept, fencing-Animal control 672.40 ;
2049 SHADYWOOD TREE INJECTION, INC. Tree removal 512.00
2050 SMILEY GLOTTER ASSOCIATES INCORP. Service-Eden Prairie Community Center 37,481.73 .
2051 KARY SMITH Refund-Rec dept 5.00 ,
2052 W. GORDON SMITH CO. Oil-Street dept 47.65
2053 DENNIS SOLIE Softball official '11.00 I
2054 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN ADVERTISER Employment ads-Planning dept 9.15 t
2055 SPORTS WORLO Whistle-Rec dept 11.00 3
2056 ST. REGIS PAPER COMPANY Channel band, bolts 375.401
2057 STANDARD HANDLING DEVICES Parts cabinef;case, steel stool-Water dept 226.40
2058 STANDARD SPRING COMPANY Bolts 10.00 "
2059 VERNON T. STEPPE Minnesota rescue & 1st aid classes 35.00!
2060 DON STREICHER GUNS, INC. Gun-Police dept 11.00
2061 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CO. Equipment repair & parts 169.61 •
2062 SULLIVANS SERVICES, INC. Pump tank-Research Road 75.Or
2063 TALL TIMBER TREE CARE Tree removal 425.0E
2064 DON THOMPSON Tennis instructor 84O.OF i
2065 CARRIE TIETZ Minutes-Special City Council meeting 26.0f I
206A TOWNS EDGE FORD, INC. Equipment repair & parts 387.6
20, ROGER K. ULSTAD Expenses 49.2(
2068 UNIFORMS UNLIMITEO Body vest, helmets, face shields 2,484.0C9
2069 UNION OIL COMPANY Fuel-Street dept 602.Oi
2070 VALLEY EQUIPMENT CO. Hauling charges of dozer 101.75
2071 VAN WATERS & ROGERS Sulfate-Park dept 195.31
Warninglights-Hwy 169 - Vo-Tech 54.2(
2072 WARNING LITFS, INC 9 Y
2073 RIVER WARREN AGGREGATES INC Rock 61.6'r
2074 WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY Pipe, cement, gasket 873.5'- 1
2075 WEBER & TROSETH INC Adapter, pump tanks-Fire dept 363.67-
2076 A. WEISMAN CO. Candy bars-Rec dept 142.3'
2077 WEST WELD SUPPLY COMPANY Welding supplies-Street dept 118.4. ;
2078 XEROX CORPORATION Service 988.41
2079 JOSEPH YAGER Refund-Building permit 31.5'
2080 ZIEGLER TIRE SERVICE Tire tubes-Street dept 465.1C-
2081 CHRIS ENGER Expenses 100.Or'
2082 OUSTCOATING, INC. Oil roads 645.0r!
2083 INGRAM EXCAVATING Service-Grill property 2,159.(1
: Instructor-Rec dept 56.0' 0
208�. JACK FREDERICKS p �
2085 PERKINS MOTOR TRANSPORT . Freight charges 126.0c1
2086 DON SARLES Refund-Rec dept 2.0('"
2087 HOPKINS POSTMAS1ER Postage 144.1f.
2088 BROWN & CRIS, INC. High Trails Estates Utilities 61,034.01.
2089 BROWN & CRIS, INC. West 78th Street & Mitchell Road 40,615.6',"0
2090 ITEM CHEVROLET CO. New squad cars-Police dept 20,484.0f
20^' PAUL KUJAWA Mileage 135.Oc:
2, NODLAND ASSOCIATES, INC. Chatham Wood Addition 172,444.1"
2093 G.L. CONTRACTING, INC. Shady Oak Industrial Park Phase II 20,037.0:'.
i
1LI3
Paggo six
Jul 17, 1980
2094 BROWN & CRIS, INC. Cardinal Creek Addition 78,538.5,
2095 NODLAND ASSOCIATES, INC. Lake Trail Estates-Sewer & Water 15,372.4?
2096 NORTHERN CONTRACTING, INC. Round Lake Arca Utilities 62,086.3r �.
2097 JEAN JOHNSON Expenses 10.26
TOTAL 1,152,367.51
•
I al
is
L`:
•
•
li
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
t_ LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Applicant: Thelma Griffith Haynes
6425 Beach Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Prepared By: Eberhardt Company
P. 0. Box 1385
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440
Bather-Ringrose-Wolsfeld-Jarvis-Gardner, Inc.
7101 York Avenue
Edina, Minnesota 55435
Location: Approximately 17.4 acres Located on the northwest
shore of Bryant Lake on Beach Road
General Comments: •
The subject property is 17.4 acres, located along Beach Road at the
northwest end of Bryant Lake. The proposed plat contains six single
family lots ranging in size from 1.60 acres to 7.47 acres.
Mrs. Thelma Haynes has lived for many years in an existing residence
located on the northernmost lot (proposed Lot 1, Block 1). Proposed
Lots 2 through 6 would be sold, and a new single family home would be
constructed on each lot with driveway access to Beach Road. No new
street construction is proposed.
The homes to be constructed on Lots 2 through 6 would be connected to
an existing sanitary sewer located along Bryant Lake (see utility
plan). Water would be provided by private wells inasmuch as municipal
water service is not yet available in this area. No variances are
necessary, and the land would not require rezoning to accommodate the
proposed density of approximately 2.9 acres per lot.
•
This property was included in a proposed 26 lot plat submitted to the
City and preliminarily approved by the Planning Commission and Council •
in 1978. However, increasing development and other costs made that
proposal not feasible, and final approval of the plat was not pursued.
•
•
161
- ) .
PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF
BRYANT LAKE VIEW ESTATES
,
( , I ) .. ,\" 't.'' _--- --
,
. t, / ',.—IIW)1 1
e-- 1
%
,., // :-.1'., it' J ,\ . %
ortia. 1 . i•. ' ..4V.\,I, %
7NELMA G HAYNES f/ ..... 7.-i: u ) - / )1, \
641S MAUI ROAD 5'. ,,.--\--,'-----. .Z-'-747.-.) % 1
[DEN PRAIR,E.MN. \ .5 'I Nr,..,..L.01-4^ 7:77'.\-=•;=.;.r----44 ) ,.7..•,..";' .--,?.:77,74 ,
\\%; I .-- '\„•'.--.-.'7\ ' r
, \-- .. .),...,\\;.\\\ , i 1 ,, fo,
rorAL ARCA•
\‘',' ,I \ . :..75:I:,,15,...\. \, .......,\, ..1. ,,,..., '
15,\. ,.t . , -•-.';'.:,-..A.5.51) 1 1.. \ ..4).',7.'\4-17.I7,:,/
•
\\\I'.; t ':.\,,.,.5: ;1. L 41 I s \I‘V":1".1.5\.' './X-4 m o>m m.... •••• i
ousirr•I.,AGMS/GOT \\ .51 t.,. ;',.. N‘., . 5,1.4,• .i 1,, ,;;;...,,....4.5 ,",-,•v:•-•:. c--. • ,1
\' ,`\, , .:•..„\ •:.;*4;4.;:4'.`i141
\ i
i
:' , \,vs -\.•• -- --- 41i))//5,.:;•••<,'‘.;...,. .''7 %\• - . - • 0„
' :-.._., \ t.'.• ,...,-\-) ''''S ;.; .. .1t; l':1
_...-.-._..
1 .7.71;117,1f71--'i..`-'•,... .--r41'.„Pi ci...,- "e'L°L,,,,'Cr' 'l Zo.
\'', \,
t
..",,
V .k II . \ , ,.. ••s i... v t ..—‘,........
,t,,,,,, . 4,..,,z 7,,,,,,.... .v. ,..4,,,,,,,,.......•...n, 1
V\.\ "?'... .11 . ; - •\:\'YS.',.':. „k,, ,-.. \
\\
S:,
\ ,\‘:.,, i ,,\k _,,,,..,..:,,,y fl• i.----......4r\,, ‘1 1
1
( . ii ..., •.;-‹ -..,,,,,„.., _ ,-,-„- -:- .
Nt • / szos../-4:_-_, : , '
.--''''., ....,.....: • - :‘"-
M.. \ .-..,::ks‹..Cag-Wit.,..*:11•T t. i
••• \ N '''\ \ - 1 I il 1
ILI:::ITZ4....;f1:4••••roV.V.rt....V=ra.ra!rr:.....1:tr•rt:::tro.; \ -— ..1 ..:
al.!'"...e.t...i,.•..:71..4:•=otr.r..:Vg..'41...!••"1,t.:=.1:".*:41:1 .• .. N ..-."------------
\ '
0 • -- - -• .i
5.5.1"..E.7•74n7.a:..":::4"V::iiir;"7"4"4""t7:"..":"'''=.4":' ----- I.
.... .
1"F:-:2;,:.4.:7::::',F.:Ei•II:2.-..:7 '..-1::::::17.7'..ii;:4.17.4..::—..-'1
.
1
......... ..,
:. •... g'.....::Fer,i'e'r.. r••=1.7..,.T.......V.r..ZI.
PfIlVaa.r,Vl,,I+
CA.U.00 AI TAU
+.
....fts
tt 7 C MT . ••••••4,11.1•ow+ "....'..................
11191(P ,:14••••••"4•••••••,ir
.it AA or.. •,1? . .
. ..
•.
••PRELIMINARY PLAT i
OF
BRYANT LAKE VIEW ESTATES
T
( OWNER 1 ,-.:... 1 ./;1 \ .".,' '
i
TNtt MA N NAVAL'S
GAPS&ACM ROAD ...s. -;,/ —--,-.''5'' ,I
20,441 '
WEN PRAIRIE.Mk ,....„„.... --,-.-,,..„- 7-7---7---,77777:Pa- — : ••;.,..--;'4 1
. 1, f'' ' •,•`:••:, - 4's. I ' ' •.. A r'-':,-'. ;-..,....'
.s.„ . , - .d. ',', ',P.4",;''• p, ..r.,;'.,- 1
•. - V •\. , , ....,,,...,,,,;,• /
- . , .' • N'1,•- ',/ •,F ' ' I
TOTAL AREA•
/74 ACRES ,'',...''' 1\L'1'.......: ' '•••••.'21,0\ /••.-''.,'''
, . '‘...5.: .; I i, • ', ,...' ,..T.7"
•
eclair?,.?1,ACRES/107 \ , N. • ' 1.];../1 I ,' ' '• .; .4-',.' •;•-•''',4,7 .-,,', t.\:•.\•\1,:-..•'\,'-\‘\;--,,<.-•--/z-,•.-?•i;..;.'•.i;,.'?';'":1..'.'.'...I7,.,0,.,,-.:..'''-''.,"-_• ;-"--;•-;'."-,
.„,.-..,•
... -
1, ,., /
_ /
' ;.' . „ .•
' _•--:-...--,Ai .• i 1 i •
:...• ;; .. ,. ••-h• ----1., ',C:' ..' I
. .
'51. ''..-1\."•, ,.- -v.... ),I, '' ''I , , 'r-J4'..."•‘ at.
1 ,,•\,..f Itai.'-,.\..._. .."\ f. 'AA,• ' 4. 1
11-. 7.7i:r.„;7"7:iT.i.. ..77- '''''1.-1. ,,k., ., _ti _ ----. 4; \\:,-;_, :,,,••,... , .,... ..,•••••f••••11/1:1,,,,••;46 VII 4 l.,, I .
., •.1 7 , , ,"•-: Y.;\.''''•c ,1t._!.,,..,...,...0,
:\\,. ~A, ;.. ..- •-\.f.;.f.,;.,7,-..,,‘\
..,:`,.•,—. ^.
,..'‘ • .'• ' ''...4.1\'' ,'.',1_Lts';`•--".. .:- z s..„..„,„.., .
, •. „...___ wi. : ---,,
• \•,.•\, ‘. \, i:-. --,,'I; --' .
NI,,,.,,i, . ... 4- '..0'1,... i.,'-‘'-'I ,..k.,. 1. •
•
.v • A..- . ,.. .'14.,.,-1:,''''.e'c'''Tc''1-fi,..-N,'''''''''-'.•1.--- '.:.':.':::'
. \x•-'.;‘,1.: "V.* ;•7,---.":-- t_i_,43..,,,A, '!- •..-- .
( • •,;•.,•• •-•...• .-•-• , _,... .2....,..„,....4.,. , „.
\ IN,;<...2 --I.' ,'......„. ‘. ,..f.....!..!:".-Ir-7\..I._ '_...-:-I'.•.....•'.1,'•VI I
\ - s
— , /')'..I';' •• A
\ •.. r-N\I //: irt.T"..ii:.)1ATI:,0. ; • 1
•
r''. . "--...1='---',...)"
4,, ::,,grnargrerarr.vti' , 0',
11010.1110 , '.-Ni,, , V • *r 1
f _
••• N)'....',,,'\
v2.4r,rr.:.5-i.:17::-;=:•14;:v;::::::'?:,",,i,,I:r.z.1.1:.':F,:..r:";E'illii.711'
---,...,..,.4-,--.:...r.r....-:•...7,....„................... .
• all.-
- • ,
\. 1. -..•. \ ' - ' •i
5.!:-:'...ii7z.S4:4:;:i.1.11::atr..41.1.v•rr L"''"
... ,
:::.::"..r..."=1.'::...',1".:';:..;•.:7::4,.::::;.:iiiii:1:2:::::',r::47,7,"" \
ii.....lii,:21:74.7..T41.:Z.,:rr...r.:77.:„...:„..,„..........„.... • . .
,........:.
Z awax.„.6 se.r/1.46,'aux
s.Z... ..'--. '••..emomm;•••••••limum;'"'
. .........
rm F. . -......-. _ .....- „.-
::::-.T..^..z,.:4-..•-•n....e....."
.Or i•of•••••••••.••a••,.....•
011N44f ha eV),
gastAtAR OVA&
.;•••
•-If .
I ,
411.0...0 Or v..•••••••••..
...... . .
. ..
. e......'4'..".... ' =0:::::""."'..rt•'1
lr''74. 2 \ I••••VeNt mom** .1•••..••••..... .....,-
=.„,...................
...r I imIO 41!'411.11M10•1 . .
,,..„..........:: 16 I') I.•.4,41,..sr..al, I
. .„ . .
... . .
.„. .
....
•
•
MEMO
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Chris Enger, Planning Director
PROJECT: BRYANT LAKE VIEW ESTATES
APPLICANT: Thelma Griffith Haynes
REQUEST: Revision of a portion of the 1978 zoning and single
family plat of Bryant Lake View Estates
LOCATION: Northwest of Bryant Lake, South of 62 Crosstown extended
and east of and adjacent to Beach Road
DATE: , June 6, 198D
•
BACKGROUND
In 1978 the Haynes parcel was approved as a 26 lot subdivision under the
R1-22 zone on 23.4 acres. Because of the expense of installing roads,
storm sewer, water, and sanitary sewer, in relationship to the profitability
of the project, it was never final platted and development did not proceed.
(A copy of the original plat is attached).
The current request is to preliminary plat the southern 17.4 acres of the
property into six single family lots without public water.
• The northern cul-de-sac (7 lots in the 1978 plat) would not be developed
until storm sewer from this area could be hooked into a future system to
the east.
The current proposal would leave 7.5 acres of land unsewered for the
existing Haynes home(lot 1). The remaining five lots would range in
size from 1.6 acres to 2.4 acres and would be sewered. The change
proposed is significant in that the lot sizes have increased similar to
other lake size lots in the area.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to
the following items:
1. A 50 footwide right of way must be platted in the location shown
as 1 rod easement on the proposed plat. An asphalt road, not to
exceed 10% in grade, 24 feet in width shall be constructed within this ROW with a
cul-de-sac and storm water control installed at the northeastern
boundary of the property.
2. A lateral sewer extension paralleling the existing trunk sewer should
be constructed and individual services tied into.
3. Because of the steepness of grade , homes on lots 3,4,5, and 6 should
not be placed with theirgarage floor elevation helms, the 880 contour.
On lot 2, the Shoreland Management Ordinance requires that the home
be no closer than 125 feet from the Normal Ordinary High Water bark.
/OE
•
Memo-Bryant Lake View Estates Plat -2- June 6, 1900
4. Special grading or storm sewer provision will have to be made on
lot 4 to prevent erosion and drainage damage.
5. Platting of a right of way through the property will separate
a portion of lot 1. This lot should be made smaller to continue
to allow lakeshore for lot 1, but so as not to be a buildable
lot. This area should be platted as an outlot.
6. The cash park fee would be paid at the time of building permit ;.
issuance.
7. Since each lot will be built on individually and each has potential
for severe erosion to the lake, erosion control standards must be
reviewed by the Nine ',tile Creek Watershed District and erosion
control plans submitted to the City as a part of each building
permit.
CE:jj
. s
•
IL19
)
•
• •
I I'REL/AVA/AfRY PLAT Or...
:1.
',\II Iir.1 i•s
0 BRYANT LAKE VIEW ESTATES
( ,
i !1(.II . .
, ' ' ; 'I ,i OWNER: riffLAfA C. HAYNES
) 1 I
•.;..."..":,:s.:,..,4,7.1.1f,' '
1 • : ; :II . ,1 .',:l , , . ;
1,•.4- .•1
...\ t,.\1 •
.c.---.-- :
7 7. —..--7.:7;;;:?.-..i iLria....-.4J 1,—---rr. 1-7--„,—,-3:::"4.—cp-.--,7`2•:-;-•7---• —
\J.; 4! , .-..: t -.• •t! •....,:,-:.,:. ,.•,.,4
s," 1' -- , 's,-,- % • ' ; ',.,. 4.--s• . • -; , ,/
, ,, 4. - , : ,.•• \ct ../ / .,-;',..
. \1\ , -:.c;.T s ' Is's'• ..2 i • • '.V.,; s.. ; fZ;i
,:f'' '-/i2 ',.-\''''''.'..1' )1 , '' ,••••.:., ///....
\\\ 2\ ' •;.. ‘:. ...:,, i:fl: , ''::;, ..'"..,;•'' ...
\\ \,,, • '.. , Al„ !.,• 1: :,.:-. //,' ,
‘ .V\ :,Vic A ii...-) ,•:, . //
t \\ s ' $:j - •A . .'...'..; i 1 1 i I.
• It T., \ -k':::±e"?'''.‘ ''••-•••• I if
1r 'Ir' \"' ,AI' , %..-:"ri7- .'..• -. :•, —
•
--,1..;1,;ri, ', •,• \ : I, .1- ••••„„.,
i, 111111'."-7 \ "i'. ; -'"7'1 43,:‘, ‘.,..''N..N. A\ '\ .'.
' .s . 7;\ 's • \ • '\\ '
!;-‘ '.-‘,...1.1t•-•-• . , .\ • •
\ ,--'s. '5-,-, ,.. . r • •
'
'''' • 4...
• \ '''' \'' '11. .•• . - . • .
E...f...,.:::.z....:-..,,:.-,..:.,..:::::•.-zff2,....„.:-..,;:-..,...,,,, \ \\ \ .
; . 1
\ ....s...* . ,,
; .
\\ f \'''''`'' . Ill
s
:-.....-.7.:-...,...::•::.:::.r-,...::::,-...r.:-,.::-.::.
iF.,:1::.:':::.:':::::.7..!.:7...::.:.'''.1.:..-::''.•:•::''''''' . .'
• ,
1 .
F:,:::::::,772;.:':;•:•'..7i7.:1:1':....:::!*7:
. i
TOTEI ACIA.131 Afii,
1i
-.--
• ------_____
...:-.r 5
Haynes .......„.......___
..............._
Property
.--_::::.::::::-."-
.............. ,
ii.,2()
1
Unapproved
Minutes-Planning Commission -5- June 9, 1980
ALL MEMBERS PRESENT
E. BRYANT LAKE VIEW ESTATES, Replat of preliminary plat, by Thelma Haynes.
Request to preliminary plat 17 of the 23 acres of the previous preliminary
plat for 1 existing home and 5 new lots for single family construction.
Located along the northwest corner of Bryant Lake , adjacent to Beach
Road. A public hearing.
Don Ringrose, BRW, stated the economics of the previous 26 lot subdivision
were infeasible. He outlined the location of the sanitary sewer to serve
the lots, the access easement for the home to the northeast, and stated that
the homes would install private water.
The Planner informed the Commission that the previously planned collector
street over 494 does not now seem likely , but the Engineering and Planning
staff feel a neighborhood collector should be planned to connect this project
to development to the north and northeast, and to the City park.
Torjesen commented that the improved road suggested by the staff would only
serve two homes. The Planner stated that it will ultimately serve more and
function as a neighborhood collector, and if not built now will be more difficult later.
Mr. Ringrose expressed his belief that building of the road at this time is
not necessary ; instead he suggested that the right of way be deeded to the
City or that the area be placed in an outlot which could be conveyed when
desired by the City.
Torjesen inquired if the R1-22 zoned lots could be further divided. The Planner
replied affirmative.
Levitt asked if the plat meets the requirements of the Shoreland Management
Ordinance. The Planner replied yes.
Mr. Ringrose felt restricting building to the 880 contour would be detrimental
because it would not allow the opportunity to place homes away from the freeway
and within view of the lake. He added that , because it is a sensitive site, •
individual building plans could be submitted to the Watershed for review and
erosion control recommendations.
The Planner felt placement of homes below the 880 contour could lead to unnecessary
removal of additional trees and landforms .
Mrs. Hanley,640B Rowland Road, inquired if her access is being kept intact.
Mr. Ringrose replied affirmative. •
Motion 1
Torjesen moved, Gartner seconded, to close the public hearing on the Bryant
Lake View Estates preliminary plat. Motion carried unanimously. •
Motion 2_
Torjescrimoved, Retterath seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval
of the preliminary plat dated April 25, 1980 as per the staff report of
June 6, 1980 with revisions to recommendations 1 and 3 as follows:
1. A 50 foot wide right of way must be platted in the location
shown as 1 rod easement on the proposed plat.
3. On lot 2, the Shoreland Management Ordinance requires that the
home be no closer than 125 feet from the Normal Ordinary High
Water Mark.
• Motion carried unanimously. '�2�
�\11.`SOr4
0c 1 Minnesota
r a LDepartment of Tr -lsportation
District 5
4.( •
,p 2055 No. Lilac Drive
�roF/RP�'y Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
(612)5453761
June 9, 1980
Mr. Chris Enger
Planning Director
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
In Reply Refer To: 315
S.P. 2785 T.H. 494
Plat review of Bryant Lake View Estates
located east of 494 on the Northwest shore of
Bryant Lake on Beach Road in Section 2,
Township 116, Range 22 and Section 3, Township 116,
Range 22 in the City of Eden Prairie,
Hennepin County
Dear Mr. Enger:
! We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. We find the
plat acceptable for further development with consideration of the following
comment:
- This plat was reviewed by us on February 7, 1978 and comments were
sent to the City. Those comments related to noise from 494 and coor-
dination of the final survey of the development with our District Land
Surveyor. We have no additional comments at this time.
If you have any questions in regard to the above comment, please contact
Mr. Evan Green at 545-3761 extension 119. Thank you for your cooperation in
this matter.
Sincerely,, i
W. M. Crawfofd, P.E. 'i `\.......
District Engineer
cc: Charles Weaver
Metropolitan Council
Cary Backer
Hennepin County Surveyor's Office
An Egusl Oppornrni$y Employer
° 0
�r.. n nn
. i L 22- .
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.R$0 115
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF BRYANT LAKE VIEWESIATES.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Bryant Lake View Estates
dated April 25 1980 , a copy of which is attached hereto and amended
as follows:
is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie
Zoning and Platting ordinances and amendments thereto and is herein
approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of
19 .
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
Sohn D. Frane, City Clerk
SEAL
{
•
•
jmj
Olympic Hills Sixth Addition
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA
( i
ORDINANCE NO.80-03
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING ORDINANCE 135
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended as follows:
The following described property, as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto
and made a part hereof shall be and hereby is removed from the Rural District
and shall be included hereinafter in the R1-13.5 District.
Section 2. The above described property shall be subject to the terms
and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of •
1980, between Olympic Hills Corporation, a Minnesota corporation.and The Preserve,
a co-partnership consisting of Carter & Gertz, Incorporated, a Minnesota
corporation and The Minnesota Gas Company, a Delaware corporation, and the
City of Eden Prairie, which agreement is hereby made a part hereof and shall
further be subject to all of the ordinances, rules and regulations of the City
of Eden Prairie relating to the R1-13.5 District.
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage
and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
•
Eden Prairie on the 22 day of Jay , 1980, and finally read and adopted
and ordered published at a regular meeting of the.City Council of said City on
the day of , 1980.
ATTEST: Sidney Pauly, Acting Mayor
John 0. Frane, City Clerk
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the _ day of 0980.
v� v
DESCRIPTION OF THE PART OF OLYMPIC HILLS SIXTH
ADDITION TO BE ZONED TO R1-13.5
t.
Outlot C, MEADOW PARK, according to the plat thereof, on file or of record in
the Office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
That part of Government Lot 4, and accretions thereto, Section 23, Township 116,
Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said Section 23; thence South 89
degrees 13 minutes 29 seconds West, assumed basis for bearings, 1123.97 feet
along the south line of said Section 23 to the point of beginning of the
herein described property; thence South 89 degrees 13 minutes 29 seconds
West, along said south line, 753.95 feet; thence North 01 degrees 04 minutes
37 seconds West, 395.01 feet; thence North 83 degrees 30 minutes 51 seconds
East, 150.75 feet; thence North 10 degrees 59 minutes 35 seconds East,
122.58 feet; thence South 88 degrees 03 minutes 20 seconds West, 249.09
feet to the east line of Registered Land Survey No. 1041, files of Registrar
of Titles; thence North 00 degrees 18 minutes 04 seconds West, 780.31 feet,
along said east line, and along the east line of Outlot C, MEADOW PARK,
according to the plat thereof, on file or of record in the Office of the
Registrar of Titles, to the northeast corner of said Outlot C; thence South
80 degrees 51 minutes 00 seconds East, 378.24 feet; thence South 63 degrees
20 minutes 59 seconds East, 208.43 feet; thence South 54 degrees 16 minutes
26 seconds Fast, 124.40 feet; thence South 39 degrees 49 minutes 56 seconds
East, 225.36 feet; thence South 48 degrees 29 minutes 55 seconds West,
150.00 feet; thence South 38 degrees 31 minutes 05 seconds East, 101.35
feet; thence North 47 degrees 35 minutes 28 seconds East, 140.00 feet;
thence South 54 degrees 25 minutes 26 seconds East, 221.01 feet; thence
South 65 degrees 33 minutes 05 seconds East, 267.51 feet; thence South 74
degrees 19 minutes 36 seconds East, 547.40 feet; thence South 62 degrees 42
minutes 10 seconds East, 185.83 feet to the east line of said Section 23;
thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 18 seconds East, along said east line,
28.39 feet; thence South 01 degrees 52 minutes 59 seconds West, along said
east line, 196.49 feet; thence North 65 degrees 45 minutes 30 seconds West,
418.84 feet; thence South 61 degrees 16 minutes 25 seconds West, 277.35
feet; thence North 71 degrees 36 minutes 12 seconds West, 663.82 feet;
thence North 17 degrees 14 minutes 25 seconds West, 257.56 feet; thence
North 47 degrees 35 minutes 28 seconds East, 111.04 feet; thence North 38
degrees 32 minutes 41 seconds West, 102.14 feet; thence South 48 degrees 29
minutes 55 seconds West, 198.50 feet; thence South 32 degrees 2D minutes 10
seconds West, 137.30 feet; thence North 88 degrees 34 minutes 22 seconds
West, 130.10 feet; thence South 12 degrees 37 minutes 02 seconds West,
107.94 feet; thence North 89 degrees 13 minutes 29 seconds East, 135.00
feet; thence South 14 degrees 48 minutes 42 seconds East, 144.31 feet;
thence South 54 degrees 49 minutes 15 seconds East, 476.88 feet, to the
point of beginning.
•
•
• 3
•
That part of the following described property:
( That part of Government Lots 1 and 10, and accretions thereto, Section 24,
Township 116, Range 22, and Government Lots 1 and 2, and accretions thereto,
Section 25, Township 116, Range 22, lying westerly of Olympic Hills First
Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, and southerly of Line A
hereinafter described, and northerly of Line B hereinafter described:
Line A
•
Beginning at the southwest corner of Outlot A, Olympic Hills First Addition;
thence northwesterly 1280 feet along a line deflecting to the left 42 degrees
from the west line of said Outlot A; thence westerly to a point in the
northerly extension of the west line of Government Lot 1, Section 24, distant
360 feet north of the southwest corner thereof and there terminating.
Line B
Beginning at the southwest corner of Outlot B, Olympic Hills First Addition;
thence westerly 470 feet along a line deflecting 100 degrees to the left from
the westerly line of said Outlot B; thence northwesterly to the northwest
corner of Government Lot 2, Section 25, and there terminating.
Which is described as follows:
Commencing at the southwest corner of said Section 24; thence North 01
degrees 52 minutes 59 seconds East, assumed basis for bearings, 167.24 feet
along the west line of said Section 24 to the point of beginning of the
herein described property; thence North 01 degrees 52 minutes 59 seconds
East, along said west line, 127.24 feet; thence North 00 degrees 09 minutes
18 seconds West, along said west line 65.62 feet to the above described Line
A; thence North 89 degrees 13 minutes 29 seconds East, along said Line A,
190.75 feet; thence South 03 degrees 09 minutes 39 seconds West, 220.29 feet;
thence South 86 degrees 50 minutes 21 seconds East, 43.00 feet; thence North
03 degrees 09 minutes 39 seconds East, 223.25 feet to said Line A; thence
North 89 degrees 13 minutes 29 seconds East, along said Line A, 183.19 feet;
thence South 64 degrees 26 minutes 06 seconds East, 1599.67 feet; thence
South 10 degrees 39 minutes 39 seconds West, 267.31 feet; thence North 80
degrees 03 minutes 44 seconds West, 225.94 feet; thence South 34 degrees 32
minutes 09 seconds West, 147.05 feet to the above described Line B; thence
North 66 degrees 10 minutes 18 seconds West, along said Line B, 1424.32 feet;
thence North 25 degrees 02 minutes 44 seconds East, 68.88 feet; thence North
07 degrees 37 minutes 05 seconds West, 125.90 feet; thence North 71 degrees
14 minutes 45 seconds West, 230.50 feet, to the point of beginning.
11,2116
•
Business Management
9110 Foe Run Circle
q(� Eden Prairie.MN 55344
t 4 171 (612)941-2706 941-8839 ?.
10 1
June 5, 1980
Mr. Wolfgang Penzel
Mayor of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Rd.
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344
Dear Mr. Mayor:
Thank you for your letter of May 23rd regarding my election
to the Eden Prairie School Board. I am looking forward to
serving the citizens of Eden Prairie in that capacity.
Do to my election, I am hereby resigning my seat on the Parks
Recreation and Natural Resources Commission effective July 1,
1980. I have really appreciated the City Council giving me
the opportunity to serve.
Sincerely,
David E Anderson
DEA:C l
cc: Roger Ulstad
•
•
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
•
THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Sandra F. Werts, Recreation Supe
DATE: June 13, 1980
SUBJECT: Letter from Janene Connelly
A letter was received from Janene Connelly, the newest member of the
Historical/Cultural Commission, on June 3, 1980 expressing some reservations
•
on being able to continue to serve on the Commission. In a phone conversation
with her later that afternoon, Janene Connelly felt it was best that she
resign and asked that the attached letter dated June 2, 1980 be accepted as
a letter of resignation.
At the June 12, 1980 meeting of the Historical/Cultural Commission, the
Commission recommended that the City Council accept the letter of resignation
from Janene Connelly. They would like to recommend Barbara Johnson, 7660
Atherton Way, be appointed to fill the unexpired term of Janene Connelly.
SFW:md
• j
•
FYI
Jancne Connelly
14045 Sundial Court
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
{
2 June 1980
Ms. Sandy Werts
Eden Prairie City Office
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Sandy:
Thank you for sending the meeting notice for the June 12 historical/
Cultural Commission meeting. It really helps to receive those notices
in advance for planning.
As much as I desire to participate on this Commission, it appears that
every time there is a meeting scheduled, I have a calendar conflict.
When I agreed to serve on the Commission, Thursday evenings appeared
to be a good evening for me, but, since then I've had difficulty with
almost every Thursday evening meeting.
I realize how important it is to have members who are regular participants,
so therefore, perhaps it would be best for me to resign so that you can
locate someone with more flexibility. Should this be the case, I would
still be willing to lend a helping hand whenever the need arises.
Please let me know if I can be of assistance in any future events.
I regret that we will not be in the City for Schooner Days as we
were looking forward to it.
Sincerely,
Janene Connelly
•
1Gz1
MAY2= 1980
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • "
320 Washington Av, South
u Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 `��ki�•' I
HENNEPIN
_FL_ 935-3381
May 19, 1980
Mr. Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Mr. Penzel:
Hennepin County and Scott County have signed a consultant contract with
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. to prepare reports for the Location Study
process for County Road (CSAH) 18. As an integral part of this process,
the counties are attempting to have a Citizens Advisory Group (CAG) formed.
Thus, the counties are requesting that each of the local units of government
which the County Road 18 Corridor is located in, appoint two citizen members
to the CAG. It is anticipated that the first CAG meeting will be in July
of 1980 and thus we are requesting that the appointment be made and noti-
fication of those appointments be sent to Vern Genzlinger, Project Manager,
Hennepin County Department of Transportation, 320 Washington Avenue South,
Hopkins, Minnesota, 55343, by June 30, 1980.
A brief summary of the functions and background information relative to i.
the CSAH 18 CAG is attached.
Since ly,
O.
Herbert 0. Klossner, P.E.
Director
HOK:lar
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an equal opportunity employer
•
CSAH 18 LOCATION STUDIES
CITIZENS ADVISORY GROUP
Introduction
The Location Study process for County Road (CSAH) 18 commenced with the signing of
a contract with the Consultant, Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. in April, 1980.
This process includes the preparation of Draft and Final Environmental Impact State-
ments. The first phase of the process is scoping of the project which will entail
a preliminary analysis of the alternatives and establishing a criteria for evaluating
the alternatives.
Hennepin and Scott Counties are the agencies jointly responsible for the Location
Study process. Hennepin County has been designated as the lead agency. The two
counties wish to establish a Citizens Advisory Group to work with the Consultant
and a Technical Advisory Committee being formed to provide insight and feedback
from the public for the duration of the process. There are six units of government
which have a vital interest in any decisions regarding CSAH 18. The counties are
inviting each of the below listed governmental units to name two citizen members to
the Citizen Advisory Group:
City of Bloomington
City of Eden Prairie
City of Savage
City of Shakopee
Hennepin County
Scott County
Assignment
The members of the CSAH 18 Citizens Advisory Group (CAG) will be called upon to express
community and neighborhood attitudes and opinions throughout the location study process.
Additionally, they will be asked how to best schedule and announce public meetings
and to better insure public involvement.
The group will also directly input the CSAH 18 Technical Advisory Committee which has
recently been formed. This will form a key link in the ultimate decision making
process for the CSAH 18 project.
Scheduling
It is anticipated the first meeting of the CSAH I8 Citizens Advisory Group will be
held in July of 1980, and that this Group will remain active through the thirty month
life of the location study process. The regularity of meetings will be determined by
the Group itself. In order to insure adequate notification of the first meeting each
of the governments listed above are requested to designate two members to the CAG
and notify Vern Genzlinger, of Hennepin County, by June 30, 1980.
nnn
•
MEMORAN UM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Community Services
FROM: Stephen Calhoon, Park Planner
DATE: June 12, 1980
SUBJECT: Tennis Courts Bids
The staff received bids for construction of 2 tennis courts at Round Lake
Park, 2 tennis courts at Prairie East Park and a multi-use court at Topview
Park on June 12, 1980. Funding for these courts will come from the 1979
Park Bond Referendum. The following is a summary of the bids. The staff
suggests the bid be awarded to the low bidder, Tennis West.
Company Round Lake 2 Topview Prairie East Total
Tennis Courts multi-use 2 tennis courts
Bituminous Roadway $15,475 $6,367 $18,716 $40,558
Daily F, Sons Black- 16,920 5,642 19,89R 42,461
topping
Tennis West LTD 12,364 3,230 15,390 30,984
Henry 0. Mikkelson Co. 13,300 4,200 16,900 34,400
Warren's Excavating 14,147.50 4,924 17,433 36,504.50
Bituminous Consulting 13,662 4,096 16,792 34,550
G Contracting Co., Inc.
1(30
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services ►4- 41-
DATE: June 12, 1980
SUBJECT: Receive and Award Bids for Porch at the Senior Citizen Center
Due to some delays in preparation of the plans and specificiations for
renovation of the porch at the Senior Citizen Center, staff requests the
Council delay the receiving and awarding of bids to July 1S, 1930.
BL:md
• Jf R
( N1iRDRANDUll
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
TIIRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: June 5, 1980 •
SUBJECT: Creckwood Park Acquiition and Development •
On May 20, 1980, the City Council authorized staff to negotiate acquisition
of the DeLecour property located south of Sunnybrook Road and north of
Purgatory Creek for the purposes of developing a neighborhood park. Major
users of this park at this time will be the residents of the Crcekwood
development. However, in the future this park will serve the arca of cast
of Creckiaood between County Road 1 and Purgatory Creek and areas to be
developed north of Sunnybrook Road.
A letter was sent to residents living in the service area of this neighbor-
hood park inviting them to attend the June 16 Parks, Recreation and Natural
Resources Commission meeting to provide any input they would like in regard
to development of this park site. A copy of the schematic plan for the park
was attached to that letter (that schematic plan is also attached to this
memo).
Prior to the drafting of this memo, the only input received from residents
of the Creekwood area was some concern regarding the trail access to this
park. This trail access also poses a concern to City staff due to the
location of the adjacent property owners and the low marshy terrain over
which the trail would be built. The other alternative access to this park
would be along the future bike trail adjacent to County Road 1, then northerly
along the future Homeward Hills Road. The bike trail adjacent to County
Road 1 is scheduled for construction in 1951. The City could also pursue
a temporary trail easement across the Preserve property from County Road 1
to this park location. This access would not be as direct for residents of
the Crcekwood area. However, it would be much easier to construct and
would provide fewer problems for adjacent property owners.
Attached to this memo is a letter from Paul J. De Lecour accepting the
City's offer of 850,000 for his 12.6 acre parcel.
At this time, staff requests authorization to proceed with acquistion of the
parcel at the agreed upon price and to prepare plans and specifications for
advertising for bids on grading this site late in 1950. Prior to actual
advertising for bids, the City will have secured a temporary trail easement
to provide access for the Crcekwood residents.
llL:md
• /63,2
•
•
•
May 22, 19S0
Creckwood
Creckwood Estates
Sunnybrook Road •
RE: Neighborhood Park Acquisition
•
Dear Resident: •
During the summer of 1979, a number of residents of Creckwood Estates
met with City staff, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
Commission and the City Council to discuss the existing neighborhood
park needs in this area of the City. The City Council directed staff
to include acquisition and development costs for the Creekwood
Neighborhood Park in the 1979 Park Bond Referendum. The referendum
was passed in November of 1979.
During the fall of 1979 and the spring of 1980, the City staff has
reviewed several park sites and in Pebruary of 1980 requested appraisals
�• on the Paul J. DeLecour property south of Sunnybrook Road and north of
the creek, and on a portion of the Preserve property located north
of Pioneer Trail and cast of Creekwood Estates.
On May 19, 1980, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
reviewed a city staff proposal recommending acquisition of the Paul J.
DeLecour property for development of the first phase of a Creekwood area
neighborhood park. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
recommended acquisition of that park at this time. On May 20, 1980, the
City Council approved staff negotiating acquisition of the DeLecour
property, also to negotiate acquisition of trail casement acrossed the
Preserve property. A trail connecting Creckwood Estates to the neighbor-
hood park will be developed through Outlot A of Creekwood Estates acrossed
the northwest corner of the Preserve property to the southwest corner
of the neighborhood park. The trail will be initially of an ag1imc
surface and will include a brige crossing Purgatory Creek. This neighbor-
hood park will not only serve the Creckwood Estates area, but also future
residents of the Preserve property to the cast and future development along
Sunnybrook Road to the north.
Phase II of the neighborhood park acquisition will be concluded when the
Preserve develops the approximate 40 acre parcel located cast of Creekwood
Estates. The future acquisition is also slowat on the attached map.
•
/C33
• •
•
Creekwood Estates -2- May 22, 1980
Crcckwood
Sunnybrook Road
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission will be reviewing
the master plan for the Crcckwood Park site at their June 16, 1980 meeting
All residents arc invited to attend that meeting to provide any input
they may feel is necessary.
The City staff is satisfied that this park plan will satisify the ncighboor-
hood needs of this area of the City and hope that residents will be able
to use this park during the summer of 1981.
Sincerely,
Robert A. Lambert
Director of Community Services E -
•
RAL:and
encl:
•
•
•
•
3
I 3r'
I.
•
ii
1 ' .>>.I, . ,1 , ,\\ ��1\ 'I 9.',I t,1('\
•
1 ' .f1 ..11t' 1 t � 1\ \ . '� I•
•
I t, 1 l,\ % ' k 1 . 1 • . _ 1 I r I`'• 1 I/ I `\ i \1 1 .
.\\ ,\1 / ',, I� 1 roo T6A17 1 1
j,;1, 1 , ;\` \ L''IRI�\./�/ r I
•,n e/ ,.. 7r.�\ 1 1� • 1_ fit;\I"7"</tL\\I•i'IINNIg I+, V I t''� (\\ I I
i.
j ,J I
tl \ ` i t; 4 -, .. ,,,or.,„,.......toew nr
• u nr1� ; •j .. I ` I ' + �U 61y\1 ! \ in1vl,av Mu:,trn.� I ` t. If 1!\1 J .
..[ I
k i‘1% i
FP I-
- " ' \. '' cl..n)..P.i.',1_ 1 ((, ,,..'.::...c.1YINL '''." ^r' fir Ck 'h)
( . 1
\ \, \ \ \\\ `;\;\ / ) ll` �\ .
1
�.1 •.•• � I.
C;I;Et(wooD IPA.R. K111•ittil.t j 1
• ( )
'
\ ' • . \ •i � 1.� ., •f I.
IC35
r WIIOLISAI.rrS or MEXICAN iuBraTunr&ARTCI'AITS
V Showroom- Warchouw:^..I'52.51 Boca Chien Blvd.
•
LI 64162
C.' DRO VNSVILLE,TEXAS 78520
!I0
May 28, 1930 •
NO
Er. Robert A. Lambert
Director of Community Services
City Offices •
C950 Edon Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 553114
Dear Er. Lanbert:
We are in receipt of your letter of Pay 22nd, regarding the
acquisition of our Eden Prairie property for a future park.
The price offered, $50,000 for the whole site, is acceptable
to us and we will sign the purchase agreement accordingly on
receipt.
We appreciate your efforts on our behalf in presenting a
more realistic appraisal to the council. please advise
them that we have already paid the first half taxes on this
property.
It was a pleasure meeting with you, and we extend a most
sincere invitation to you to visit us sometime in Brownsville,
"On the 1iorder, 3y the Sea".
•
Sincerely,
Paul J. ecour
1:; 7 `c
y C. Dc Lecour
I`36
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
T}I1lU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: June 12, 1980
•
SUBJECT: Lake Eden Park Plan
During the first week in June a letter was sent to residents of
Lake Eden and Ridgewood areas east of 169 informing them that
the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission will be
reviewing the Lake Eden Park Plan at the June 16, 1980 meeting.
Attached is a copy of the letter sent to residents and a map
that they received showing the schematic plan for Lake Eden Park.
Staff requests the City Council to review this plan at the June
17, 1980 meeting and approve the schematic design so staff can
proceed with final plans and specifications for this park to
be included in the Anderson Lakes Parkway Project. Upon approval
of these plans by the City Council, they will then be forwarded
to the School Board for final review of this school/park site.
Staff estimates the City will be taking approximately 15-20,000
cubic yards of fill from the school property for development of
the park site.
BL:md
101
•
•
June 5, 1980
Residents in Ridgewood and lake Eden Area:
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
RE: Neighborhood Park
Dear Resident:
Daring the summer of 1979, a number of residents of the Lake Eden Area
met with City staff, Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
and the City Council to discuss the existing neighborhood park needs in
this area of the City. Subsequently, the development of the Lake Eden
School/Park site was included in a park bond referendum that was approved
by voters in the City in November of 1979.
As many of you know, in order to develop the park site, the City will
require 15,000-20,000 yards of fill prior to final grading. The school
district has agreed to allow the City to level the top of the hill of
the school site to create a temporary ballfield on their site and to
use the fill from the school site for the park site.
At this time, the City is preparing plans and specifications for the
f extension of Anderson Lakes Parkway from Preserve Blvd. to Highway 169.
In conjunction with this improvement, the City is also preparing plans
and specifications for the development of the park site. This project will
be advertised for bid as one project during August of 1980, and construction
will begin during the fall of 1980 for completion during the sumuner of 1981.
On June 16, 1980, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
will be reviewing the schematic plans for the Lake Eden Park. Upon approval
of those schematic plans, City staff will proceed with plans and specifications
for this park. The purpose of this letter is to invite you to attend this
Conunission meeting to provide any input you feel is necessary towards the
development of this park.
A map showing the schematic design proposed for Lake Eden Park is attached to
this letter. Access to the park will be along Anderson Lakes Parkway. An
8' bituminous bikeway will extend from 169 to Preserve Blvd. during this phase
of construction. The 8' asphalt bikeway is proposed to continue adjacent to
Anderson lakes Parkway easterly to County Road 18 in another project, also
to be completed by the end of 1981.
If you have any questions prior to the June 16 meeting, please feel free to
contact me at 937-2262, ext. 37.
Sincerely,
•
4-14Gt/ /4-riAta—
Robert A. Lambert
Director of Conmiunity Services
RAL:md•
�LJD
one'.
•
\
\ ••-••. - •- ,),\ .„ \
r.-- 4r, n ---- •• ---____.------.74••-- , :. --
•_.,.
--'—\• •../.-..131<° ,---7:77':'''.7.:2.. ..--, ....,_,.......,_,_____ ,....:.V..,___________;__ siaC •--;:.
.
', '•
- 1.• . ••'" its - 1 .41. il .42.0:1
1Ww.f. ,,
i •
: .
II 1 )vm 7 01 17. •
1 ,I
II i•
•
. \ -.--
?.. --1-1
_10.10011I ,,,,
a:1
I Et:1 ..:<-.-,
• I. 1 ,..„. IP
,..,. MI -..-..--:-
• 1 1 '' .._ ___ . __, i_
t
,
, 1: l• t --:: .,__i
1 ,1
N (1)1(D
\ tkj C I • ,11 /,----------. l' \-- ,
• 1'
1 1 0, s, ) • ,I
11
1 i t •• 1 " \ 1 I . i , -
\ • .1 r......A......
I\11 •
I \ „ 1 _ __ __- ..J.:, ..._,•• , /
____.----":-.....,-,:... .-__ ,---• •,
i•_---_---.-..-.-:.-,..-- ---- ---.•
__„----1---_,--:.,,,,...,--.:„...-•-___ ---\ 7---
:N----___ -!-----7------_•.-----•:-•-_-.1:,-,..-•v•-..;--.-:;•---7.-11--- ----1 /
(7.--e---N72: —._t--77`.-.- -.7.,7-.---z..:-T-T-----,:-::-:" .--s-i,:.:--::-.,:T.:.::L'-"----:---;,‘.•:"---•:7- •,- --.-N- --`-;;
:.. 4, •-; /\ i
.. ,
t/ill / (:-" N----_,2••: -..:::::--- T---\ !,• //1---N \j
11
, 9/. • 50 ,...././A:(1
. '71: ' - Ys .Z1-‘.i: Z. . C., / .: // ..--•j''-''
I : El ,':'.(:,/ill 1 1 I 'i •<%
. ..„ ,.
:...„.•••__ _ , , „.(•,,,.,...-.2- •..._• •____..--- ..... ,
1 .
iii,•,/...; __Ak. - ,
•
1 I t :,,-,;://:•_ z, _____:::,-. \.-_,,_ .,i i i((i I('' °'°1 i.fi'
1 , ,, , ,•,_____..\
% . .t .
, , ,, ,)u____•- ••• •-•.------ , - i ‘.
,i,„, - •
....,....... ......______-• I, 3.. • ,
1 ' • ••„,, • ,-..-7.„..-2------
•. ,.,..,_ .... ..„.. . ...
...i.. .... _../1 ./••,,,,c,,,,.'.- -. .,,-.:•-,-,-;--.7,__.1.--- ., . 2---------[
\\,•,. ---._. _••••••- .../. ,, „....----__
__ ,,,.... ..., ..,
,,.. •_... „. e 1 , ...•I.,
-..
::•:' ( (7/( 7-..... ,.../1.--:1,,,. .-:.:1.-:-..:-.1. • ' ''''
/'7 * 1 • ''':::''' ) I I .1// _ 11f31 I*) --N --- ---- ••••F• . "" -'11-
I,
r-',2,,,. - .::......i.._.-.......L. .. ---
..........- .
TOMEMORANDUM
: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
TIIRII: Roger K. Ulstad City, Manager
FROM: Bob lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: June 2, 1980
SUBJECT: Round lake Park Picnic Shelter/Warming Mouse
One of the proposed improvements to Round Lake Park approved in the 1979 Bond
Referendum was a picnic shelter/warming house proposed to replace the existing
warming house and group shelter structure presently used for group picnics.
The proposed program for this facility describes the function and requirements
of the facility. The proposed location is depicted on the attached map.
FUNCTION
This building will be used for the following functions:
1. Warming House
During December, January and February this facility will he used as a warming
house for the existing hockey rink, a possible future hockey rink, free skating
area and a possible future speed skating track. As a warming house, the facility
must provide an area large enough to handle a maximum of approximately 150
skaters at a time. The flooring in this general open space area should he of a
cut proof rubber material that is easily maintained. Benches should be provided
around the walls of the facility. Other warming house benches can be installed
during the winter months. The warming house should also provide restrooms and, •
if possible, an office area and sound system that can provide music directed to
the skaters on the rink with a microphone system for announcements to the
participants out of doors. (This facility would replace the existing warming house.)
2. Beach Shelter
This facility would also be used as a shelter for the adjacent beach and would
include an office area to provide security for storage of the beach equipment
such as kick boards, poles, swimming lesson records, etc. and
would double as a first aid station. A sound system would also be desirable for
use as a beach shelter. Again, the Will purpose would be for announcements and
emergency use in clearing the beach etc. This sound system would be located in
the office/first aid room for security purposes. An exterior speaker would he
necessary. The facility would also provide a concession area with counter access
from both the interior and exterior of the building. The concession area should
provide a sink, refrigerator and sufficient storage area. This facility would
replace the existing small concession stand located at the beach. This facility
should also provide rest rooms for beach use.
kg()
-2-
3. Picnic Shelter
The existing large group use facility at Round Lake is in poor repair and should
be replaced. This facility would also be used for group reservation use on
weekends. The existing facility is rented for group and family picnics nearly every
Saturday and Sunday from May through the middle of October. Some of these groups
arc as large as 400 people. The groups require a large open indoor space
in case of bad weather, access to restrooms, power and water.
4. Summer Playground Program
This facility would be used as a base for the Summer Teen Program. There should
be storage for recreational equipment such as table tennis tables, softballs,
volleyballs, basketballs, etc.
5. Athletic Association Storage
The Athletic Association presently uses a small room in the existing warming house
at Round Lake for storage of athletic uniforms and equipment for the various
athletic programs supervised by the Association. The Athletic Association
should have a storage room with floor space of approximately 20x20 with access to
the outside.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
The architecture and exterior tone of the building should blend well with the
existing picnic shelter located next to the tennis courts and should not conflict
with the other buildings on the Round Lake School/Park site including the new
Comnuntiy Center, the existing Fire Station and the new High School. The building
will be located between the beach and the skating rinks. The facility should have
a 25 foot concrete deck on the lake side of the facility to enhance the group
picnic use of the facility. All windows should be of Lexan or n similar product.
All doors, frames and casements should be made of steel. Vandal proof hardware
shall be used on doors, windows, light fixtures, etc. The building must be as
energy efficient as City code requires and the interior of the building shall have
lighting of at least 100 foot candles.
Restrooms should be accessible from inside and outside and should have locks that
will allow restricted access from either inside or outside. Windows facing the
skating rinks and the lake arc desired.
This building should be connected with City water and sewer, if at all possible.
If elevations do not permit the sanitary sewer connections, a sanitary sewer tank
will be installed.
The attached map shows the proposed location for this building. Staff requests
Council approval of this program and building location. Upon approval staff will
submit this program to the Smiley Glotter Architectural Finn for design, plans,
specifications and bid. Staff would like to have this facility completed during
the summer of 19S1.
IlL:md
-5...
•
, •
\
N N a •
\ a
N
N )N 4
( 0
8 9
N` \
N i
D 4k
I IQ
i I
to_ .-111111141 1114
:ILP a iii '
/ 1•7\• ••• 3 D ,
•vnt74.______,•L‘;‘,''''':").... :.
.:.i•;1-:':'3':'.-L_L'S,j-'".:',iiT•7-:',''jl...7;,,i:;:..?..',:'-j,';':,'.1!..,..•1:1:•;::.:/4.:;::::;.,::.;-::.si.):•,,,::t.N.:-
Ill ,
.•.,. ,. .
it)
7 . T.:
%. ,Y,•ri.," ,,,,
3
F.
P 1.21 :,.. II
$‘ i.-,x-,
..,-1-.4s.,
LI) kc:.;;-.
)
tl.... ..... —
,. •
I 1 •••
3 w„,
d Ns...
/ ...- .?.i
n.. itr•.,
. ..-)f -, L
.., ,, ,.1:-. .,, ., •::.7.:,,, :,,.;;s..e.„,my.,.. i.•,-..,,c,:....22,:...,.
,,,.... .„ • ... ,,, ,,, . . ,, ., . .• , t
3 (7.-_ip • tk ••-kf,';: ,....,... - clij ..A.:•„i: •4;-) ,•‘.•••.,,Q"• ' ..i..,,,.. 4'1.,r, 1
T? *4-'-'-i7.‘.4'...;•.'".':•:.ii e.• (;,..,',.if!'..,..1.5,
a ,..?tib! . (...,,..:,:.,......._,...,,s,_,....„.., ,j).-0.,,,,..„,„ ,,,,.„
.,::y ,,)?.,,,i , , ',.... A.,,"
,• ' '.4. '1/4....... .I.J.* r,......,,.4.
*:....I'f''.:e f,,,,,-;':..;% -,,,.; •'•...'::r.:, 4.0.) C:.I.J;•" " 07.,,.
1 • • • i
...4.,t4'; M.:1, .--- 4','.;'.• 1.••..,,i '•
I llil2 till"
June 12, 1980 •
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
( HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R80-119
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following
improvements;
I.C. 51-359 Norseman Industrial Park 4th Addition
HatermainiStreet and Drainage Improvements
bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids
received are shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends award of contract to
Brown & Cris, Inc._______
as the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEO by the Eden Prairie City Council
as follows:
The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed
to enter into a contract with Brown & Cris, Inc.
in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of •
_$256,792.10 in accordance with the plans and
specifications thereof approved by the Council and on file
in the office of the City Engineer.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 17, 1980
ATTEST: WoTfgan9 iT.—fenzeT,-Mayor
SEAL:
John D. Frane, Clerk
•
•
June 13, 1980
•
Carl Jullie, P.E.
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55343
RE: BIDS ON IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 51-359
WATERMAIN, STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
NORSEMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 4TH ADDITION
Dear Mr. Jullie,
Bids on the Norseman Industrial Park project were taken
r-,'-N on Thursday, June 12, 1980 at 10:00 A.M. The low bid was i!
submitted by Brown & Cris, Inc. in the amount of $256,792.10.
A summary of the eleven bids received may be found on the
attached Summary of Bids sheet.
rieke
car/ The engineer's estimate for the project was $298,000.00.
associates Inc The difference between the low bid and the estimate apparently
archaects reflects the extreme price competition that we have seen on
eccneers several bids this spring.
land surveyors
planners
Brown & Cris, Inc. is a reputable firm which has satisfactorily
completed several projects in Eden Prairie. We recommend
awarding the contract to Brown & Cris, Inc.
Sincly,
Eugene A. Dietz, P.E.
RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATES, INC.
EAD:cp
Encl.
PoSI office box 130
1011 lest steel south
h;Akins.rninnisota 55343
61:935 6901
• J( LU
.
•
•
SUMMARY OF BIDS
I.c. 51- 359
DESCRIPTION: Norseman Industrial Park 4th Addition
BIDS OPENED: June 12, 1980 10:00 A.M.
CONSULTING ENGINEER: Rieke Carroll Muller Associates, Inc.
CHECKED BY:
•
BIDDER BID SECURITY TOTAL AMOUNT
Brown & Cris, Inc. 5% $256,792.10
Northdale Construction Co. 5% 263,180.60
Nodlbnd Associates, Inc. 5% 273,902.00
Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. 5% 274,169.50
Northern Contracting, Inc. 5% 276,431.40
Richard Knutson, Inc. 5% 280,956.0U
Progressive Contractors, Inc. 5% 291,120.95*
G. L. Contracting, Inc. 5% 291,707.00
Minn-Kota Excavating, Inc. 5% 313,986.00
Minnesota Valley Surfacing 5% 316,878.50
Deluxe Construction Co. 5% 340,099.40
The undersigned recommend award of Contract to * Mathematical error
Brown & Cris, Inc. corrected.
as the lowest responsible bidder fot this Improvement Contract.
Conf.ulting Engi:3eer Carl J. Jullie, P.E.
Rieke Carroll huller Associates, Inc. Director of Public works/City Engineer
� I
•
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM,: John Frane
DATE: June 13, 1980
RE: MIDB'S Braun-Kaiser Company $2,300,000 •
Braun-Kaiser a general partnership, is asking the City to authorize
$2,300,000 in bonds which may be offered for public sale. The partnership
intends to construct a $75,000 square foot warehouse/office facility
which would be leased to Braun's Fashions.
The council will be considering a first reading of an ordinance zoning the
property to I-2.
•
a._
. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
• Application for
Industrial Development Bond Project Financing •
•
1. APPLICANT:
a. Business Name - BRAUN-KAISER COMPANY, a Minnesota General
Partnership (Lessor) i
Braun's Fashions, Inc. (Lessee)
•
b. Business Address - 7630 Excelsior Boulevard, St. Louis Park,
Minnesota 55426 j
S
c. Business Form (corporation, partnership, sole proprietor-
ship, etc.) - Lessor - general partnership
Lessee - corporation
d. State of Incorporation or organization -
Lessor - Minnesota general partnership
( • Lessee - Minnesota
e. Authorized Representative• -
Lessor - G. A. Kaiser
Lessee - Alan G. Braun, V.P. - Secretary
f. Phone -
• 'Lessor - 933-6361
Lessee - 933-6161 • •
•
2.1 NAME(S) AND ADDRESSES OF MAJOR STOCKHOLDERS OR PRINCIPALS:
•
Lessor - Partner Lessee - Shareholders
a. Gil C. Braun a. Gil C. Braun
•
b. Lou Ella Braun b. Lou.Ella Braun
•
c. Thomas C. Braun c. Thomas C. Braun
d. Alan G. Braun d. Alan G. Braun
e. G. A. Kaiser e. G. A. Kaiser
f. Nick Cook
-1- g. Dale Adolf (becoming additional
shareholder)
• i/U1
•
3. GIVE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF BUSINESS, PRINCIPAL'-
PRODUCTS, ETC:
Lessor - ownership of real property leased to
Braun's Fashions, Inc.
Lessee - retail sale of women's wearing apparel
•
A. • DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
•
a. Location and intended use: 10080 Valley View Road, Eden F
Prairie, Minnesota; Industrial Warehouse for storage and
distribution of merchandise and related general offices.
b. Present ownership of project site: Dominic Sciola, Contract
for Deed Purchaser
•
c. Names and address of architect; engineer, and general
contractor:
• Rauenhorst Construction
5. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST FOR:
• Land $ 300,000.00
Building $ 1,850,000.00 •
• Equipment $
Other $ 250,000.00
•
• 2,400,000.00
Total $._�_� -- —=-_�
•
-2- •
•
•
•
•
6. BOND ISSUE -
•
�. a. Amount of proposed bond issue -
$2,300,000.00
b. Proposed date of sale of bond - August 15, 1980
•
c. Length of bond issue and proposed maturities - 30 years
•
•
d. Proposed original purchaser of bonds - If public offering -
Juran & Moody Inc. If privately placed - Northland Mortgage
Company will undertake to find an institutional purchaser.
e. Name and address of suggested trustee -
If public offering - First National Bank of Minneapolis
f. Copy of any agreement between Applicant and original
purchaser - See letter from Juran & Moody Inc. submitted herewith
g. Describe any interim financing sought or available -
If public offering interim financing will be from acquisition fund.
If privately placed a tax exempt construction loan will be sought
from a Commercial Rank.
b. Describe nature and amount of any permanent financing
in addition to bond financing - None
•
7. BUSINESS PROFILE OF APPLICANT.
a. Are you located in the City of .Eden Prairie? Lessee - Retail
store at Eden Prairie Shopping Center, considering second location
at same center.
.b. Number of employees in Eden Prairie?
•
i. Before this project: Lessee - 8
•
-3-
160
.7 .....,Zrn"t"'": !'*S; !-^.yk..re.— ..-..,...r-a...-.n-,i.r7ea• -
•
•
' ii. After this project?
Lessee - 133
( C. Approximate annual sales - Lessee - $19,773,298 P.Y.E..March 1,
1980 for all locations
d. Length of time in business Lessee - incorporated 19E1 , prior
sole proprietorship - Lessor - 1977
in Eden Prairie Lessee - retail store since 1977
•
e. Do you have plants in other locations? If so, where?
St. Louis Park - to be replaced by this Project
•
f. Are you engaged in international trade? No
•
•
. 8. OTHER INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT(S):
• i
•
a. List the name(s) and location(s) of other industrial
development project(s) in which the Applicant is the
1 owner or a "substantial user" of the facilities or a
"relented person" within tho meaning of Section 103(b)(6)
of the Internal Revenue Code.
None
•
•
-4-
•
IoS0 •
1 •
l'
•
b. List all cities in which the• Applicant has requested'
industrial.revenuc development financing. r.
None
c. Detail the status of any request the Applicant has before
any other city for industrial development revenue financing.
None
d. List any city in which the Applicant has been refused
industrial development revenue financing.
None
•
e. List any city (and the project name) where the Applicant
has acquired preliminary approval to proceed but in which
final approval authorizing the financing has been denied.
None
i
-5-
����r.�. L(05 f
..r
•
•
[.... ......._ _
f. If Applicant has been denied industrial .development `
revenue financing in any other city as
sdifid
( in (d) or (e), specify the reason(s)ofo oir the denialno
and the name(s) of appropriate city officials
whave knowledge of
the transaction. •
Not Applicable
I
• I
I
1
•
,
NAMES AND ADDRESS OF: •
a. Underwriter (If public offering) Juran & Moody Inc.,
114 E. 7th Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
.
.
b. Private Placement Purchaser (If private placement)
Northland Mortgage Company, 6600 France Avenue South, Edina,
Minnesota 55435 - will undertake to find an institutional
buyer for the bonds.
i. If lender will not commit until City has
passed its preliminary resolution approving
•
the project, submit a letter from proposed .
i lender that it has an interest in the
offering subject to appropriate City
approval and approval of the Commissioner
of Securities.
.•
•
•
•
'-::'..
-0 •-
•
b. Bond Counsel - Thompson, Nielsen, Klaverkamp & James, P.A.
4444 IDS Center, 80 South Eighth Street, Minneapoli , MN 55402
c. Corporate Counsel -
Geimer & Rice, 630 Shelard Tower,
St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55426
d. Accountant - George M. Hanson Company, South Plaza Building, �.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
10. WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR:
•
a. Construction start - September 1, 1980 ti
b. Construction completion - April 30, 1980
•
•
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The undersigned Applicant understands that the approval or
disapproval by the City of Eden Prairie for Industrial
Development bond financing does not expressly or impliedlY
constitute any. approval, variance, or waiver of anny pr rovisions
or requirement relating to any zoning, building,
or ordinance of the City of Eden Prairie, or any other law
' applicable to the property included in this project.
Applicant BRAUN-KAISER COMPANY
•
Dy C. A. fiais�partner
Dat 9 /9 ?d •
•
-7-
•
•
• 1105
r.-..., �-�-�-- *.-.x---w
t
11. ZONING - TO BE COMPLETE) 13Y THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
a. Property is zoned - Rural •
b. Present zoning (`i<): (is not) correct for the intended
use.
approved by planning commission April 28, 19t
c. Zoning application rRPRAMR4xPAI
for I-2 which is correct for the
intended use.
d. Variances required - None
•
City Plan r
.
•
•
-8-
CM 00•1:4 01
This Application must be submitted to Cam,nissionut in duplicate •
STATE Of MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE -SECURITIES DIVISION
APPLICATION
FOR APPROVAL OF MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND PROJECT
Date
To:
Minnesota Department of Commerce
Securities Division
500 Metro Square Building •
St. Paul,Minnesota 55101
The governing body of Eden Prairie , County of Iienn_e_pin
Minnesota, hereby applies to the Commissioner of the State of Minnesota, Securities Division of the
Department of Commerce, for approval of this community's proposed municipal Industrial Revenue
Bond Issue, as required by Section 1, Subdivision 7, Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes.
We have entered into preliminary discussions with:
FIRM BRAUN-KAISER COMPANY (Lessor) Braun's Fashions, Inc. (Lessee)
ADDRESS 7630 Excelsior Boulevard
CITY St. Louis Park STATE Minnesota 55426
s,aleoIInco,pn,.,eon Minnesota General Partnership (Lessor) Minnesota (Lessee)
Thompson, Nielsen, Klaverkamp & James,P.A.
Attorney Rick Massopust/Robert LevFFddres: 4444 IDS Center, Mpls. , MN 55402
Nameo1Pioioct BRAUN-KAISER COMPANY, Lessor / Braun's Fashions, Inc. , Lessee
Project
This firm is engaged primarily in (nature of business): PRAUN-KAISER COMPANY is engaged pri-
in ownership of real property for lease to Braun's Fashions, Inc. , and
's Fashions, Inc. is engaged primarily in the retail sale of women's wearing
apparel
The funds received from the sale of the Industrial Revenue Bonds will be used to(general nature of
project): Acquisition of land and construction thereon of an approximately
75,000 square foot industrial warehouse.
It will be located in
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
The total bond issue will be approximately Si. ,300,000.00 to be applied toward payment of
costs now estimated as follows:
Cost Item Amount
Land Acquisition and Site Development S_3 pQ,.11nn-O,.0_
Construction Contracts 1,.115 ellS)_Ph
[quipment Acquisition and Installation _]n n �00y0
Architectural and Engineering Fees Inc1'lrl i ]jL_Co•:t. SS�IL4L3LSt-�---
Legal rees _40.000y00
Interest during Construction -0-
Initial Bond Reserve --2_31L1>.1tIl--QD
Contingencies L ? '�-+���0
rinnri fikrnunt t'o-)) --L-4.OOQ,.40
•
It is presently estimated that construction will begin on or about September 1_ ,1980
and will he completed on or about Apri 1 30 , 19 81 .When completed, thew will be
approximately l25 new jobs created by the project at an annual payroll of approximately
S.1.175,g_09_9Q_based upon currently prevailing wages.
The tentative term of the financing is _30 years,commencing August 15
19 80 .
The following exhibits ate furnished with this application and are incorporated herein by reference:
1. Art opinion of bond counsel that the proposal constitutes a project under Minnesota Stat,,
Chapter 474.02.
2. A copy of the city council resolution giving preliminary approval for the issuance of its revenue
bonds.
3. A comprehensive statement by the municipality indicating how the project satisfies the public
purpose of Minnesota Stat.,Chapter 474.01.
4. A letter of ictent to purchase the bond issue or a letter confirming the feasibility of the project
from a financial standpoint.
5. A statement, signed by the Mayor, to the effect that upon entering into the revenue agreement,
the information required by Minn. Stat. Sec. 474.01 Subd. 3 will be submitted to the Depart-
ment of Economic Development.
6. A statement signed by the Mayor, that tha project does not include any property to be sold or
affixed to or consumed in the production of property for sale, and does not include arty housing
facility to be rented or used as a permanent residence.
7. A statement signed by the Mayor that a public hearing was conducted pursuant to Minn. Stat.
474.01 Subd. 7b. The statement shall include the date, time and place of the meeting and that
all interested parties were afforded an opportunity to express their views.
8. A copy of the notice of publication of the public hearing.
•
We, the undersigned, are duly elected representatives of Eden Prairie , Minnesota,
and solicit your approval of this project at your earliest convenience so that we may carry it to a final
conclusion.
Signed by: (Principal Officers/
•
•
This approval shall not be deemed to be an approval by the Commissioner or the state of the
feasibility of the project or the terms of the lease to be executed or the bonds to be issued therefor.
Date of Approval
Catumrt,oner of Socur itses
M,nnctora Department of Commerce
1(O1.51D