HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 05/20/1980EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
(7 TUESDAY, MAY 20, 1980
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL STAFF:
7:30 PM, CITY HALL
Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Dean Edstrom, Dave
Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and Paul Redpath
City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney ,
Roger Pauly; Planning Director Chris Enger;'
Finance Director John Frane; Director of
Community Services Bob Lambert; Engineer ,
Carl Jullie, and Joyce Provo, Recording 1
Secretary
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
A. Special Joint School Board/City Council meeting held April 17, 1980 Page 1234
B. City Council meeting held Tuesday, May 6, 1980 Page 1237
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Resolution No. 80-96, approving the Final Plat for Valley Knolls Page 1248
2nd Addition
B. Resolution No. 80-97, approving the Final Plat for Menard's 2nd Page 1251
Addition
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Rymarland Camp 2nd Addition by Milt Quam. Request to rezone 22 acres Page 1253
from Rural to R1-13.5 and preliminary plat 42 lots for single family
detached homes. Located east of TH 101 and south of Hidden Ponds
Second Addition (Ordinance No. 80-10 and Resolution No. 80-90)
Continued from May 6, 1980
B. Cardarelle & Associates, Inc., Office. Request to rezone .8 acre Page 1275
from Rural to Office and setback variances. Located at 8123 Eden
Road. (O-Fdinance No. 80-11) Continued from May 6, 1980
C. American family Insurance Phase 2 Building by Rauenhorst Corporation. Page 1282
Request to rezone 3 acres from Rural to Office. Located west of
present building at 6131 Blue Circle Drive. -1-6rdinance No. 80-12)
D. Appeal petition from The Preserve on decision of Board of Appeals Page 1287
& Adjustments on April 17, 1980 denying rear yard setback variances
for Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, proposed Garrision eTist 4th Addition.
(Resolution No. 80-86)
E. Appeal petition from John D. Dougherty on decision of Board of/Weals Page 1304
& Adjustments on Auril 17, 1980_granting building moving permit
request No. M80-8 for Lot 1, Block 1, proposed Garrison Forest 4th
Addition -/Resolution No. 80-85)
Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,May 20, 1980
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 1522 - 1702 Page 1319
VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request from Hustad Development Corporation for a revision on their Page 1323
Bluff's West 3rd Addition, which was approved for 169 single family
lots, to allow townhouse density on a portion of the site.
VIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
B. Report of City Attorney
C. Report of City Manager
1. Receive and consider bids for Two-Way Radio Equipment Page 1325
2. Amendment to Mutual Aid Agreement Page 1336
3. Liquor Store Lease at Anderson Lakes Parkway and County Road 18 Page 1337
E. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Swedlund Property - Riley Lake Page 1339
2. Round Lake Park Plan and School Site Plan Page 1367
3. Creekwood Park Purchase Page 1368
F. Report of City Engineer
1. Final Plat approval for Garrison Forest 4th Addition (Resolution
No. 80-87) Continued from May 6, 1980
2. Consider bids for improvements in Cardinal Creek 2nd Addition,
I.C. 51-376 (Resolution No. 80-92 and Resolution No. 80-93)
3. Approve plans and specifications and order bids for Phase II,
Valley View Road/Dell Road improvements, I.C. 51-325 (Resolution
No. 80-94)
4. Receive feasibility report for street and walkway improvements Page 1375
from Preserve Boulevard to T.H. 169, I.C. 51-341 (Resolution
No. 80-95)
5. Report on Edenbrooke development and Dell Road project north
of Duck Lake Trail
6. Report on Eden Prairie School District request for access to
Co. Rd. 4—Tor future Middle School at Round Lake site
7. Report on Bluff's Boulevard street name change
Page 1144A
Page 1371
Page 1374
Page 1376
Page 1377
Page 1379
Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,May 20, 1980
G. Report of Finance 1111 nn
I. Draft Housing
2. Consideration
3. Resolution No
Contract with
NEW BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT.
& Redevelopment Authority Ordinance
of Insurance proposals
• 80-91, approving the Environmental Health Services
Hennepin County
Page 1382
Page 1383
Page 1384
[DIN PRAIRIE SCHOOL BOARD/EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
OFFICIAL MINUTES FOR MEETING OF APRIL 17, 1980
SPECIAL JOINT SCHOOL BOARD/CITY COUNCIL MEETING
A special joint meeting of the School Board and City Council of Eden
Prairie was held on the 17th day of April, 1980 starting at 7:00 p.m.
in Room 410 of the Lden Prairie High School.
Call to Order
School Board Chairperson, Jo Wigen called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Rot 1 Cal I
A roll call was taken reflecting all School Board members and City Council
members present except for Sidney Pauly.
Valley . View_ Road
Mayor Wolfgang Peniel said that the City Council understood that the
School Board Vid', interested in discussing three topics involving the
Valley View Road: the pedestrian overpasses, the vacation of West 72nd
Street and installation of stop signs at intersection of Valley View Road
and Humes Way.
Mayor Wulfoano Pen/el continued by stating that it was his understanding of
the consensus of Council members that the following position reflects the
current feeling of the Council on each of the respective issues:
Pedestrian Overpasses
The decision to approve the pedestrian overpasses rests with the
State of Minnesota. The State of Minnesota has reported that they
will rut be in a position to review and/or approve the pedestrian
overpasses until around August 1980. Therefore, the City of Eden
Vrairic will not he able to seek bids on the pedestrian overpasses
until approval for them is received. It is anticipated, however,
that thu bid'; can be sought for the pedestrian overpasses during
the Ii II of 1480 and still have construction completed simultaneouS
with thc fir%t phase of Valley View Road construction, that is. that
portioo of Valley View Road lying between the railroad tracks and
County Road 4.
Vacation of West hod Street_
the Mayor stated that it is up to the School District to initiate
requw.t to vacate West /2nd Street. The City would be receptive
to initiate 41 hearing for such vacation whenever the School District
made o tuquw.f. The City would expect that the normal traffic from
OtIlt.101 iusutc. if Jainl School tbnard/LItY LOWICII Meeting April 1/, 19B0
Duck lake Road would be channeled through Valley View Road when
and it /2nd Street is vacated; therefore, the City would request
that such vacation be delayed until Phase I of Valley View Road
construction is comyleled.
Stop_Sigo at hams Way_andValley_View, Road .
The Mayor stated that the City would approve a stop sign at Homes
Way and the School District driveway. The City did not believe it
would W appropriate to install stop signs on Valley View Road at
that intersection at this time. The Mayor also stated that the City
and School District could review that intersection again when Valley
View Road is completed and traffic is using the road. If a problem
exists at that time the City would be receptive to discussing the
concerti with the School District.
Chairperson, Jo Wigeo stated that the School Board has concerns with
the traffic on Valley View Road prior to the pedestrian overpasses being
completed. The School Board would request that Valley View Road be open
for school use only until those pedestrian overpasses are completed.
Wolfgang Penzel stated that the City still hopes that the pedestrian
overpasses will be completed simultaneous with Phase I of Valley View Road.
The School District's request is appropriate and agreeable with the City
except for that traffic using Duck Lake Road. The School District will
oeed to provide access for that traffic on either Valley View Road or
West /2nd Street.
Jo Wigen stated that athletic fields will be in the process of being
constructed on or around West 72nd Street creating a construction problem
if West 72nd Street must be left open. The School Board also hopes that
the pedestrian overpasses would be completed on Schedule with Phase I.
Jo Wigen then clarified about the stop signs at Homes Way and Valley View
Road. She inquired if that Was a four-way stop. The Mayor stated that
the City needed School District input concerning that intersection. It
was currently planned to have a stop sign only at Dames Way. Additional
stop signs would be subject to further discussion with the School Board
dependent upon need. If electronic signalization was desired the City would
request the School District to assist in the payment of such signalization.
Other School Board milkers stated that there was a greater concern for the
students crossing Valley View Road than for school buses or othe motorized
traffic. Stop sions would assist the students in being able to safely cross.
John lobben requested clarification on an original proposal to have a new
.,ection of Dock Lake Road running east and west from Valley View Road to
Duck Lake 'acid couvleted prior to the railroad overpass being opened.
Mayor PeOLO assured John Lobben that the portion of Duck Lake Road John
lobben referred to would not be open to traffic until the railroad overpass
was completed.
loren Irvine stated that the School District 's parking lot appears to be a
part of Wes' ljnd .1.1.et, and it would make it difficult for the School District
to keep We. , /2od Street open for through traffic. Wolfgang Penzel suggested
/9,24
4_1
Official Minutes of Joint School Board/City Council Meeting, April 17, 1980 p.3:
that the School Board request an early hearing for the vacation of West 72n4
Street. David Osterholt stated that there is a resident living at the end of
West /2nd Street that must be given access to their property.
Comnunity Center facility
The architects for the City of Eden Prairie reviewed schematic desions of the
Community Center facility with the City Council, School Board and Park
and Recreation Commission members. Richard Anderson asked if the School
Board was satisfied that the School District could use the Conumnity Center
facility for physical education. Jack Greenawalt responded that the School
District had calculated a time loss of from 4 to 5 minutes per class for
students walking Irina the high school to the recreational facility: It was
also assumed that the School District would schedule swiinning classes from
the high_ schocil only during spring and fall but not during the most
inclement weather of the winter. Mr. Anderson asked if the school was
prepared to bus students from the elementary and middle school levels to the
Conimunity Center for physical education purposes.
At the conclusion of the presentation by the architect, the Mayor asked the
School Board if any members had any additional questions or concerns of the
schematic design. The School Board inquired of a possibility of having
access to the Community Center through the rear of the building which is
closest to the high school.
The architect stated that they assumed that construction would be initiated
during the fall of 1980 and expected completion in the fall of 1981.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
( TUESDAY, MAY 6, 1980
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT:
7t30 PM, CITY HALL
Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Dean Edstrom, Dave
Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and Paul Redpath
City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney
Roger Pauly; Planning Director Chris Enger;
Finance Director John Frane; Director of
Community Services Bob Lambert; Engineer
Carl Jullie; and Joyce Provo, Recording
Secretary
INVOCATION: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: All members present.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following item was added to the Consent Calendar: "Request by the Wilson
Learning Corporation for the Council to set a Public Hearing for consideration
of MIDB's in the amount of $1,750,000.00 for June 3, 1980".
The following items were removed from the regular agenda and placed on the Consent
Calendar: VIII. D. 1. Fish Management Program; VIII. D. 2. Request for
authorization to obtain appraisal for Earl More house; and VIII. D. 3. Request
approval for authorizing plans and specifications for "figure skating" club room
at Community Center as bid alternate.
Item III. L. Final plat approval, Garrison Forest 4th Addition (Resolution No.
80-87) was removed from the Consent Calendar to the "City Engineer's" report
as item VIII. E. 5..
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the agenda as amended
and published. Motion carried unanimously.
II. MINUTES
A. Joint School Board/City Council Meeting held March 13, 1980
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to approve the Joint School Board/
City Council Meeting minutes of March 13, 1980 as published. Motion carried
unanimously.
B. Joint School Board/City Council Meeting held March 20, 1980
Pg. 1, 6th para., 6th line, strike "LOWCON" and insert in lieu thereof "LAWCON".
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Joint School Board/
City Council Meeting minutes of March 20, 1980 as amended and published.
Motion carried unanimously.
i,237
Council Minutes - 2 - Tues.,May 6, 1980
C. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, April 1, 1980
Pg. 5, 8th para., last line, strike "ungraded" and insert "upgraded".
Pg. 7, 1st para., 7th line, strike "indifference" and insert "in deference".
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the City Council
Meeting minutes of Tuesday, April 1, 1980 as amended and published. Motion
carried unanimously.
D. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, April 15, 1980
Pg. 1, 4th para., 3rd line, after "et. al." add "subject to the Governor
signing the Omnibus Tax Bill."
Pg. 3, 5th para., 2nd line, strike "Red Rock" and insert "Riley Lake".
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to approve the City Council
Meeting minutes of Tuesday, April 15, 1980 as amended and published. Motion
carried unanimously.
E. Special City Council Meeting held Thursday, April 17, 1980
Pg. 1, 4th para., strike "probelm" and insert "problem".
Pg. 1, 7th para., 1st line, strike "rescind" and insert "amend".
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to approve the Special City
Council Meeting minutes of Thursday, April 17, 1980 as amended and published.
Redpath, Edstrom, Osterholt and Penzel voted "aye"; Pauly "abstained". Motion
carried.
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Resolution No. 80-80, providing for the execution and delivery of $7,450,000.00
of Improvement Bonds
B. Resolution No. 80-81, authorizing the issuance of $4,000,000.00 of General
Obligation Water and Sewer Bonds
C. Resolution No. 80-82, authorizing the issuance of $3,570,000.00 of Recreation
Facility Bonds
D. Request to set a Public Hearing for Braun's Fashions, Inc. by Rauenhorst
Corporation for June 3, 1980
E. Request to set a Public Hearing for Northmark East by Ban-Con for June 3, 1980
F. Request to set a Public Hearing for Northmark West by Ban-Con for June 3, 1980
G. Request to set a Public Hearing for American Family Insurance expansion rezoning
for May 20, 1980
H. Clerk's License List
I. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 80-07, rezoning 4.89 acres for Norseman Industrial
Park 4th Addition from Rural to 1-2 and developer s agreement
Council Minutes - 3 - Tues.,May 6, 1980
J. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 80-09, rezoning Phase 1, consisting of 15 acres
from 1-2 and Rural to Office for the Minnesota Vikings Training Facility and developePragreement
K. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 80-08, rezoning 9 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 for
Sunset Trails by Countryside Investments, Inc. and developer's agreement
L. Final plat approval, Garrison Forest 4th Addition (Resolution No. 80-87)
This item was moved from the Consent Calendar to VIII. E. 5.
M. Request by the Wilson Learning Corporation for the Council to set a Public
Hearing for consideration of MIDB's in the amount of $1,750,000.00 for June 3,
1980
N. Fish Management Program (formerly item VIII. D. 1.).
0. Reguest for authorization to obtain appraisal for Earl More (formerly VIII.D.2.).
P. Request approval for authorizing plans and specifications for "figure skating"
club room at Community Center as bid alternate (formerly item VIII. D. 3.).
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve items A - K and
M - P on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Northern States Power - Request for P.U.D. Development approval in order to
construct an N.S.P. substation (Resolution No. 80-83)
Mr. Chmiel, Staff Assistant Environmental K Regulatory Activites Department of
Northern States Power, spoke to the proposal and displayed slides depicting
N.S.P. substations in other communities. Mr. Chmiel answered questions of
Council members.
Mayor Penzel referred to communication received from Bruce C. Bermel, Executive
Vice President of Bermel-Smaby Realtors, and John Teman, and requested same to
be entered into the record. (Attached as part of minutes)
Keith Wehrman, Wehrman Chapman Associates, Inc., landscape architect for N.S.P.,
displayed a grading and screening plan for the proposed site.
Planning Director Enger explained the Planning Commission recommended approval
for an N.S.P. electrical substation to the City Council on April 14, 1980 on a
4 - 2 vote according to the plans dated 4/14/80 and Staff Report dated 4/9/80.
Paul Anderson, appearing on his own behalf and on behalf of his parents, Calvin
and Helen Anderson, and his sister, Mary Ellen Bland, spoke to their concerns
and reservations about what the N.S.P. project may do with respect to the drainage
as referred to in his communication dated April 14, 1980. (Communication attached
as part of minutes)
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing and
adopt Resolution No. 80-83, granting Planned Unit Development Stage approval for an N.S.P. electrical substation. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to direct Staff to draft a
developer's agreement incorporating the recommendations of the Planning Commission
Council Minutes - 4 - Tues.,May 6, 1980
A. N.S.P. (continued)
and Staff Report dated April 9, 1980, amending recommendation 3 to read "N.S.P.
should prepare immediately the planting of the site at this time in order to
allow 5 years of plant material establishment", no new construction should
impede in anyway drainage through the site, and when the 345 KVM lines going
through the City(north/south)need replacing,that the steel angular tower should
be replaced with architectural tubular steel poles. Motion carried
unanimously.
B. Rymarland Camp by Milt Quam Request to rezone 22 acres from Rural to R1-13.5
and preliminary plat 42 lots for single family attached homes. Located east
of T.H. 101 and south of Hidden Ponds Second Addition. (Ordinance No. BO-10 and
Resolution No. 80-90)
City Manager Ulstad requested that this Public Hearing be continued to May
20, 1980, due to an error in publication.
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Redpath, to continue the Rymarland Camp
Public Hearing to May 20, 1980. Motion carried unanimously,
C. Cardarelle & Associates, Inc, Office, request to rezone ,8 acre from Rural to
Office and setback variances. Located in the Major Center Area, east of Eden
Road and west of Hwy. 169 at 8123 Eden Road (Ordinance No. 80-11)
City Manager Ulstad requested that this Public Hearing be continued to May 20,
1980, due to an error in publication.
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Redpath, to continue the Cardarelle &
Associates, Inc. Office Public Hearing to May 20, 1980, Motion carried
unanimously.
D. Request for Municipal Industrial Development Bond approval in the amount of
T6,000,000.00 for the Minnesota Vikings Facility (Resolution No, 80-84)
Grady Alderman, Minnesota Vikings, explained they will use the proceeds of the
MIDB financing to purchase approximately 15 acres and develop 11 of those acres.
The 11 acres will contain an office/practice building, which will consist of
34,000 square feet, two natural grass football fields, an artificial football
field of approximately 70 yards in length, which may be domed with an air-
supported structure, and two parking lots which will contain about 100 cars.
This leaves an additional 4 acres for future development and, according to
Mr. Alderman, they have no plans for the development of these 4 acres at this time
and if the Vikings wish to develop the 4 acres they will come back to the City
through the proper process.
Redpath questioned the two-year term for the MIDB's. Finance Director Frane
responded to Redpath's question commenting that the Vikings are unwilling at the
present time to comnit to a long term mortgage situation or long term financing
because they feel if the present economic situation were better, interest rates
would be lower, and that is the reason they are requesting an industrial revenue
bond for a two year period. Franc added one might view that two year period a
period of construction, and at the end of the period of construction they will
seek a lender that will give them permanent financing or long term financing.
Bruce Parker, legal counsel for the Minnesota Vikings, stated the idea behind the
two year period is that we are in a very unusual time with interest rates, and the
rates which a permanent financing would now dictate make the cost of the project
substantially more than the Vikings feel would be within the two year period, at
which time these bonds would be refinanced. L20
Council Minutes - 5 - Tues.,May 6, 1980
D. Minnesota Vikings MIDB's
MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Osterholt, to close the Public Hearing and
adopt Resolution No. 80-84, granting the request by the Minnesota Vikings for
preliminary approval of Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount
of $6,000,000.00. Motion carried unanimously.
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 1326 - 1521
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve Payment of Claims Nos.
1326 - 1521. Roll Call Vote: Osterholt, Redpath, Edstrom and Penzel voted "aye";
Pauly "abstained". Motion carried.
VI. APPOINTMENTS
A. Appointment of 1 member to fill an unexpired term on the Human Rights &
Services Commission - term to expire 2/28/81
Mayor Penzel recommended the appointment of Larry Simenson to fill the
unexpired term on the Human Rights & Services Commission.
MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Redpath, moved to confirm the appointment
of Larry Simenson to the Human Rights & Services Commission to fill an
unexpired term to 2/28/81. Motion carried unanimously.
VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
No reports.
VIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Councilman Osterholt announced he would not be a candidate for re-
election in next Fall's election.
2. Mayor Penzel spoke to the following items:
a) congratulated the staff who operate the Water Plartfor achieving
a 100% sanitation safety rating on our municipal water supply by
the Minnesota Department of Health;
b) referred to communication from the School Board regarding the
access to County Road 4 for the potential Middle School, and requested
City Engineer Jullie to give a brief report at the May 20th Council
meeting;
c) request from Busted Development Corporation to revise their Bluff's
West 3rd Addition from 169 single family lots to allow townhouse
density on a portion of the site, and the Council requested that this
request be placed on the May 20, 1980 Council agenda; and
d) concern about possible confusion over street names because of the
similarity between the name of Bluff's Boulevard and Bluff Road, and
also the absence of individual street names of the cul-de-sacs off of
Bluff's Boulevard. City Engineer Jullie to report back to the Council
on May 20, 1980 with possible solutions.
Council Minutes - 6 - Tues.,May 6, 1980
3. Councilman Redpath referred to complaints he has received on the
-developmea-g-giTan at Shady Oak Road. Penzel commented any further
problems that may occur, the Public Safety Department will issue tickets.
B. Report of City Attorney
No report.
C. Report of City Manager
No report.
D. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Fish Management Program
This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (III. N.).
2. Request for authorization to obtain appraisal for Earl More house
This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (III. O.).
3. Request approval for authorizing plans and specifications for "figure
skating club room at Community Center as bid alternate
This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (III. P.).
E. Report of City Engineer
1. Appeal petition from The Preserve on decision of Board of Appeals
& Adjustments on April 17, 1980, den ing rear yard setback variances
for Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, proposed Garrison Forest 4th Addition
(Resolution No. 80-86)
City Engineer Jullie spoke to the action taken by the Board of Appeals
& Adjustments on April 17, 1980, denying certain rear yard setback variances
for Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, in proposed Garrison Forest 4th Addition, and
the petition received from The Preserve appealing this decision.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to set Tuesday,
May 20, 1980, as the date for the Public Hearing for the Council to
consider the appeal petition from The Preserve on the decision of
the Board of Appeals & Adjustments on April 17, 1980. Motion carried
unanimously.
2. Appeal petition from John D. Dougherty on decision of Board of Appeals &
Adjustments on April 17, 1980, granting building moving permit request
No. M80-8 for Lot 1, Block 1, proposed Garrison Forest 4th Addition
Deso-lution No, 80-85)
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to set Tuesday, May 20, 1980,
as the date for the Public Hearing for the Council to consider the appeal
petition from John D. Dougherty on decision of Board of Appeals & Adjustments
on April 17, 1980. Motion carried unanimously,
Council directed City Manager Ulstad to contact the Vo-Tech School in an effort
to extend the deadline when the house in question has to be removed
from their premises.
council minutes - / lues.,may b, 19dU
3. Approve plans and specifications and order bids for utility and
street improvements in Norseman Industrial Park 4th Addition, I.C.
51-359 (Resolution No. 80-88)
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution
No. 80-88, approving plans and specifications and ordering advertisement
for bids for utility and street improvements in Norseman Industrial
Park 4th Addition, I.C. 51-359. Motion carried unanimously.
4. Consider bids for street and utility improvements in Duck Lake Vista,
I.C. 51-367, and Village Woods II, I.C. 51-362 (Resolution No.
80-89)
City Engineer Jullie spoke to Resolution No. 80-89, recommending
the Council award the bid to Brown & Cris, Inc., the low responsible
bidder, in the amount of $130,568.40, for I. C. 51-362 and I.C. 51-367,
deleting project I. C. 51-372.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution
No. 80-89, awarding the bid for I. C. 362 and I. C. 367 to Brown &
Cris, Inc., the low responsible bidder, in the amount of $130,568.40,
deleting I. C. 51-372. Roll Call Vote: Redpath, Osterholt, Edstrom,
Pauly and Penzel voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously.
5. Final plat approval, Garrison Forest 4th Addition (Resolution No. 80-87)
Formerly item III. L.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to continue final plat
approval for Garrison Forest 4th Addition to the May 20, 1980 Council
meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
F. Report of Finance Director
1. Discussion on Tax Increment Financing
Finance Director Frane spoke to the communication from Mr. Endorf
of the Dorsey, Windhorst, Hannaford, Whitney & Halladay firm dated
May 2, 1980, regarding the method by which the City of Eden Prairie could
create a tax increment financing district.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to direct staff to draft
a resolution establishing a Housing & Redevelopment Authority to be discussed
at the May 20, 1980 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to set a Public Hearing for
June 3, 1980, to consider the possibility of establishing a Housing and
Redevelopment Authority. Motion carried unanimously.
Rich Robey, Manager of the Eden Prairie Center, stated to the best of his
understanding he can find only benefit in tax increment financing to the
Eden Prairie Center and the community as a whole.
Penzel requested that the School Board be notified that the City Council
is considering tax increment financing.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
No "New Business".
X. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adjourn the Council meeting
at 9:46 PM. Motion carried unanimously. ./2ti:j
May 6, 1980
City Council
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55343
Dear City Council Members:
The following comments relate to the proposed NSP substation in Eden Prairie:
1. We have been assured by the City Planner that the substation substructure will
be adequately screened from our properties including a multistory building
on our highest elevation. We would like the developers agreement with NSP
to assure that the "as built" substation does in fact screen the site as represented
to various neighboring property owners.
2. NSP should further agree that any plantings critical to screening be replaced
at any point in time when they fail.
3. NSP's plans for Eden Prairie should contain a firm commitment to replace, over
a reasonable period of time, the structural type towers with architectual towers
in those areas where such towers are not compatible with existing or contemplated
land uses. We question the suitability of structural towers for any areas other than
industrial. Our personal concerns relate to these structural type towers in the
southwest quadrant of the MCA. When this 345 KV line was constructed, it was
our understanding that NSP had agreed to use architectural towers except where
engineering considerations dictated the traditional towers such as points of angle
in the alignment. We questioned the NSP engineering position at that time.
Subsequent observations of architectural towers at the extreme 90 degree angle
confirms our original opinion.
3910 INGO SOUI SUout • Edina, IlInnosoia 55424 • 921.7043
MI $.413111 D LE/W.11i IN 1,1 LOCATION
Bruce C. Bermel
Executive Vice President
evz4A, -/e14"
John lemon
120-
-2-
We consider the esthetics of the structural type towers equally as unsuitable to our
area as the esthetics of a substation. NSP will be required to screen their substation.
Towers cannot be screened. Underground lines are considered economically unfeasible.
Architectural towers are a reasonable comprise. We are being asked to accept another
esthetically negative NSP development in our area. This could be offset somewhat by
architectural tower replacements.
Very truly yours,
BERMEL-SMABY REALTY, INC.
LAW OFFICES
( LeVander, Gillen, Miller & Magnuson
402 DROVERS BANK BUILDING • 033 SOUTH CONCORD STREET
SOUTH ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55073 • TELEPHONE 10121 4514031
April 14, 1980
HAROLD LEVANOER
ARTHUR GILLEN
ROGER C. MILLER
PAUL A. HACNUsON
HAROLD LEv4NOCR. JR.
PAUL H. ANDERSON
TIMOTHY .1. KUNTZ
DANIEL J. BEESON
Chairman and Members of Planning Commission
City of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie City Hall
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Re: Northern States Power Company
Request For PUD Concept Approval To Construct
Substation North of West 78th Street & South of T.H.#5
Dear Mr. Chairman and Members of the Commission:
I am writing to you on my own behalf and on behalf of my parents,
Calvin and Helen Anderson, my sister, Mary Ellen Bland, with
respect to the public hearing on April 14, 1980. This hearing
is on the request of Northern States Power Company to construct
a substation upon 12 acres of land North of West 78th Street
and South of Trunk Highway #5.
Please be advised that my parents, my sister and I are owners of
a parcel of land on the easterly shore of Idlewilde Lake. This
parcel of land has been affected by past development of Northern
States Power Company and also will be affected by the presently
planned NSP development. More particularly, Idlewilde Lake originally
drained to the North, eventually running into Purgatory Creek. This
drainage was altered by the construction of the Foto Mark parking
lot, the NSP transmission tower site and the construction of 494.
The natural drainage for the pond originally ran on what is the
northerly edge of the parcel presently being developed by Northern
States Power Company.
The normal high water level of Idlewilde Lake as shown on the 1967
National Geological Survey is 852 feet S.L.D. In 1972, the
Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District ascertained that the ordinary
high water level was 853.5 S.L.D. and that at the time their sur-
vey of the lake showed that the actual water level of the lake was
856.7 S.L.D. Presently the water level on the lake varies between
approximately 857 and 860 feet S.L.D. Presently there is no outlet
to the lake unless it were to flood over West 78th Street.
You should be aware that there is a culvert underneath West 78th
Street connecting the lake with the property to the north. Before
the alterations caused by Foto Mark and NSP, there was a small
pond just to the North of West 78th Street. The water would run
Chairman and Members of the Commission
April 14, 1980
Page 2
from the small pond into Idlewilde Lake. When the water in
the lake went above the ordinary high water mark, the water
would then run North out of Idlewilde Lake into the small pond
and then overflow into a ditch and would ultimately wind its
way to Purgatory Creek. When Foto Mark put in its parking lot
and NSF put in its transmission tower this small pond to the
north of West 78th Street was filled and the culvert outlet was
plugged. This left no natural outlet for the lake and resulted
in the raising of the water level and the flooding of our pro-
perty.
In 1973 when the sanitary sewer and water were put in in this
area, we requested that the City at that time construct a storm
sewer so that an outlet could be provided for the pond and permit
the lake to return to its normal high water level. At that time,
we cited the alteration in the natural drainage for the lake.
Unfortunately, the Council did not authorize the installation of
the storm sewer at that time.
• Idlewilde Lake presently serves as the ponding area for surface
drainage for a considerable area of land surrounding it. Because
of the blockage of the normal overflow from the lake, this has
worked to our detriment by causing flooding of our property and a
higher than normal high water level. We believe that our property
rights have been unjustly affected by the action of Foto Mark and
NSF in the past and do not wish to suffer further damage by con-
tinued development without the correction of the problems created
by past development. Accordingly, we object to the approval of
the present PUD concept until proper actions have been taken to
assure that the drainage and storm sewer for Idlewilde Lake are
taken care of by the City and all parties affected.
In support of the position that the natural drainage has been
altered, I cite my parents personal knowledge. My father has been
a resident of the City of Eden Prairie for over 70 years and is
svery familiar with this area. Also, my father has obtained the
statements from other longtime residents of Eden. Prairie who have
farmed the affected land or land adjoining this and have first
hand knowledge of the normal drainage for Idlewilde Lake. Copies
of the statements are attached for your information and review.
It is our intent to be present at the Planning Commission meeting
on the 14th and we will be able to answer any further questions
you may have with respect to this objection at that time.
Paul H. Anderson
PHA:cj
May 20, 1980
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R80-96
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
OF VALLEY KNOLLS 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of Valley Knolls 2nd Addition has been sub-
mitted in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance
Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all Proceedings have been
duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and
the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordin-
ances of the City of Eden Prairie.
•
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat Approval Request for Valley Knolls 2nd Addition is approved
upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
Report on this plat dated May 14, 1980.
D. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of
this resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Regis-
trar of Titles for theiruse as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3.
c. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy
of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named
plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute
the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon com-
pliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on
ATTEST:
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
SEAL
John D. Frane,
Ix(
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
Roger Ulstad, City Manager
Carl Jullie, City Engineer
May 14, 1980
VALLEY KNOLLS 2nd ADDITION
PROPOSAL: The developer* Marvin H. Anderson Construction Co., has requested
City Council approval of the final plat of Valley Knolls 2nd Addition.
This is a 10 lot single family residential plat located west of Duck
Lake Road and north of Duck Lake Trail, adjacent to Valley Knolls
Addition.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on November 20,
1979, per Resolution No. 79-200, subject to the following concerns:
When the Council considered the preliminary plat, questions were
raised concerning the width of the existing sidewalk along the
north side of Duck Lake Trail west of Duck Lake Road.
In checking our files, we have found a draft Developers' Agreement
with Bru-Mar Construction Co., dated November 8, 1972, which called
for a four foot wide concrete sidewalk on Duck Lake Trail. Sub-
sequent documents in the file also refer to the requirement for
a four foot sidewalk.
The walk which has been installed on Duck Lake Trail is four feet
wide and therefore the developer has complied with the require-
ments of the City in this respect.
Zoning to R1-13.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on
September 26, 1972, per Ordinance #185.
The Developers' Agreement referred to within this report was executed on
January 8, 1980.
VARIANCES: All variance requests must be procedsed through the Baard of
Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: Contracts have been awarded by the City for the in-
stallation of all utilities and roadways necessary to serve the plat
with the cost of these improvements being assessed to the benefitted
properties.
/.21M
1 25 0
- 2 -
PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication requirements are covered in Exhibit B
o
f
the Developers' Agreement.
BONDING: Bonding will not be required.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Valley Knolls 2
n
d
Addition, subject to the requirements of this report, the Developers'
Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of cash deposit for street lighting in the amount of
$196.80.
CJJ:kh
May 20, 1980
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R80-97
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
OF MENARD 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of Menard 2nd Addition has been sub-
mitted in the manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance
Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all Proceedings have been
duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and
the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordin-
ances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat Approval Request for Menard 2nd Addition is approved
upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
Report on this plat dated May 14, 1980.
That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of
this resolution in the office of the Register of Deed and/or Regis-
trar of Titles for thier use as required by MSA 462.358, Subd. 3.
That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy
of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named
plat.
That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to Execute
the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon com-
pliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on
ATTEST:
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
SEAL
John D. rrane, Clerk
B.
C.
D.
12L-
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
Roger Ulstad, City Manager
Carl Jullie, City Engineer
May 14, 1980
MENARD 2ND ADDITION
PROPOSAL: The developer, Menard, Inc., has requested City Council approval
of the final plat of Menard 2nd Addition, a one lot plat consisting of
1.06 acres intended for an auto parts and accessories store. This is a
replat of Outlot A, Menard'Addition.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Counci on November 6, 1979.
per Resolution #79-208.
Zoning to C-Reg-Ser was finally read and approved on January 28, 1980,
per Ordinance #79-40.
The Developers' Agreement referred to within thit_report were executed
on January 28, 1980.
VARIANCES: Variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals.
PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in
Exhibit C of the Developer's Agreement.
BONDING: Bonding to cover the cost of installing municipal utilities and
roadways has been included in the bond amount for Menard Addition,
therefore additional bonding will not be required.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Menard 2nd Addition,
subject to the requirements of this report, the Developers' Agreement
and the following:
1. Receipt of fee for City Engineering services in the amount of $100.00.
CJJ:kh
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS IJ LAND SURVEYORS L SITE PLANNERS
Reply To
12800 Industrial Pak Boulevard
Plymouth, hAinoetota 55441
I8121 009.3700
March 4, 1980
Staff, Planning Commission,
and City Council Members
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Subject: Milt Quam
Rymarland Camp 2nd Addition
Preliminary Plat
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We would like to submit the following revised drawings
and report for your consideration regarding the subject
project. The property is generally located in the north-
east quadrant of Highway 101 and the Milwaukee Railroad.
Total acreage of the parcel is 22.95 acres.
Milt Quam, developer of the property, is proposing
to plat 42 single family detached dwellings on the site.
The property is guided for Low Density Residential use per
Eden Prairie's Land Use Guide Plan. This would allow up
to two units per acre. The proposed plat has a density
of 1.92 units per acre.
We thank you for your consideration at this time and
hope you will feel free to contact us if you have any
questions on this.
Very truly yours,
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
/
Dickman C. Knutson
DCK:pm
Enclosures
#5370
Minneapolis- Hutchinson Alexandria Granite Fails
-1-
12::;t4
Project Identification
The property involved in this proposal consists of 22.95
acres located in the northeast quadrant of Highway 101 and
the Milwaukee Railroad. Robert Quam, in October 1979,
initiated purchase of this land from Rymarland Camp.
Project History
Boundaries of the land are shown on the prints accom-
panying this statement.
Recently the property has been used as a day camp facility.
Several of the amenities of the campsite are intended to remain
as part of the site under the ownership and maintenance of a
homeowner's association. These amenities include a swimming
pool, wading pool, bath house and two tennis courts. No one
resides on the property currently.
The property is guided for Low Density Residential use
per Eden Prairie's Land Use Guide Plan. Proposed rezoning is
R1-13.5 for the 22.95 acres of single family detached units.
Density of the R1-13.5 acreage is proposed at 1.92 units
per acre.
Developer
Milton Quam will be the developer of the site. Mr.
Quam is a real estate agent with Realty Shop of Minnetonka.
He has not developed in the Twin Cities area in recent years.
Property Characteristics
The Hidden Ponds single family residential development
abuts the property to the north, providing access to utilities
for the project. Lands east, west and south are yet undeveloped.
Along the southern border of the property is an existing
trail corridor, which meanders through a treeline. The eastern
half of the site is densely wooded. Another treeline exists
along the northern edge of the property along its border with
the Hidden Ponds development. The remainder of the property
is gently rolling, open land. Soils of the site are stable
Hayden and Hamel Learns which provides good base for the
proposed units.
Highway 101 forms the western border of the property,
providing access to the site and to the shopping, service
and occupation centers for its future residents.
Quality construction will be employed to complement
the natural amenities of the site. The developer plans to
(I dedicate that area denoted as "Nature Trail" to the City in
fulfillment of Park Dedication requirements. This trail corridor
will act as a buffer to and from the surrounding lands. There
are mature trees along the entire corridor which aid in
buffering the property.
The developer intends to create the pond in the northern
portion of the project. This pond serves several purposes:
1) It will be built in a manner so as to become an aesthetic
amenity to the site; 2) The main function of the ponds, is
for storm water holding purposes.
Utilities
Mr. Quasi proposes extension of sewer and water from the
north within the Hidden Ponds development. Both utilities
would be extended from Green Ridge Drive into the plat. Storm
water would be collected in the pond at the north end of the
project. The pond will allow sedimentation to occur prior
to storm water discharge to the present Hidden Ponds ponding
. system.
Project Timing
The developer is proposing to begin construction of units
early in the 1980 construction season. Price range of the
detached units is planned to be $75,000 to $125,000.
-3-
aSto
The developer is proposing the rezoning to R1-13.5 with
the following project characteristics and land planning ideas
in minds
- The wooded areas provide buffering from and for the
proposed units in several locations:
a) the trail users and trail activity along the
southern border of the property will be buffered
by the woods.
b) the Hidden Ponds residents will be buffered from
the new development by the woods.
c) individual units of the site will be provided
privacy from neighboring units due to the density
of the woods.
- The pending area to the north of the property
provides a storm water holding area and sedmintation
control.
- The proposed lot configuration allows the homes
along 101 to face generally north and south, thus
reducing the impact from 101. Berming along 101 will
also reduce outside noise pollution.
- The existing amenities, will be available to the
residents, and, therefore reduce the strain on vet
undeveloped parks in the area, as well as the existing
Hidden Ponds park areas.
Given the site characteristics and development considerations
stated, Mr. Quam requests the rezoning to R1-13.5 for his
property and preliminary plat approval of the proposed
RYMARLAND CAMP 2ND ADDITION.
-4-
1Z7
,4 LOCATION LOCATION MAP
;I.
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. :7117 " RYMARLAND CAMP
rtt
"A IG‘lut114C INLIAIDS 8 1.31101 n 1.1:11$ II VII ttakYlfg%
APO' IS awl ItUICIONSON.MINNLSO7A 5370 2nd ADDITION
-.1:::‘,,_.- r-, 1::\:;.. . ,..„, .,,...„ ..; :1 , ._ _ __- ,,,-• • .- , :•., , , ,„ ,!. r •—• -.4' • ,',--•, V,.,.,I . )<:---. •',\ /v, .. ils.: ( ).,/.' 2 .,..2,/—.•,r"%.." ' ....-,...../.4.-- ....„...--)...,./.. ":77N, N-'/' - " , • , • . , . . -. It.)-- .'<•,---7" '':: '•• ,"'/ -‘ - N El . I ,• • !9 4\. ,. i ,`,. , \../ -,, - , e> ;) I. - ---,... ...." 4, :•:- " • - --' A 3 f.. I .,,,.! ---1;;, • - 2 it .. 4—, •" ,'L-"' A :'' J --. i'•1:-.".,:..------. - corP IP' - 5 or - - , \ '41 • f • vase. re...of, p e.e. E... p e• 't 9 of PI 71 mg' : lem tee Eye romM ImYm 4 • Amm te/I ••, LAF et.SS PRELIMINARY PLAr RrMARLAND CAMP Znd ADO/r/ON 111 M• OM epee I.4.111......EPOIn Mil. r Qa4M
LEGCNo inw --A PPILIANNAAT UM-In" PLAN
Hpvv•ne) ..17/av .1...1 410.1 •,7 N01.1100Y Iwt o'kVte) ONY7VVP11.411 awirr;IO747;C:o"1".1, tend 39VNI0 9/WOVII0 AaVNIPV17,N0 tvu.1 1' • •••••• V:, O.** • - /- /- • £ ' •\ Hj
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
( FROM: Jean Johnson, Assistant Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Planning Director
DATE: March 19, 1980
PROJECT: RYMARLAND CAMP 2ND ADDITION REVISED
PROPONENT: Milt Quam
LOCATION: East of TM 101 and South of Hidden Ponds
REQUEST: 1. Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for 22.95 acres
2. Preliminary platting of 42 lots and I outlot
BACKGROUND
The proponent previously requested rezoning to RN 6.5 and R1-13.5
in January, 1980.
The Planning Commission at their Feb. 11, 1980 Meeting recommended
denial of the request based upon the staff report of Feb. 7, 1980 as
the project's density was inconsistent with the Guide Plan, insufficient
grading and utility plans had been submitted, etc.
The proponent then revised his proposal and submitted an application
on March 4, 1980 for single family rezoning and platting.
EXISTING SITE CHARACTER
Trees exist along the south, southeast , and northeast corners of the
property. The major types are Elm, Oak , and Cottonwood. Diseased elms
have been identified and the owner has complied with removal.
A low area occurs near the northwest corner of the site and does hold
water during spring or unusually wet periods. The remainder of the site
is characterized by rolling terrain with small wooded or grass covered
knolls.
Presently the site has improvements of a gravel access drive back to
recreational uses of tennis courts, pools, small buildings, etc., associated
with the Rymarland Camps facility. Outlot A,upon which the pool and tennis
courts are located, will be owned and maintained by a homeowner's association.
t.26,2
March 19, 1980
1 ORDINANCE REQUIREME”.: R1-13.5 District
Five lots( 12%of the plat)are under the minimum lot siz
e
o
f
1
3
,
5
0
0
square feet. Lots 3-6,block 1, are only slightly under 1
3
,
5
0
0
b
u
t
a
r
e
above the 90 foot mimimum frontage required. Lot 7,block 2
,
i
s
s
l
i
g
h
t
l
y
under 13,500 and can be brought up to minimum lot size by rel
o
c
a
t
i
n
g
side lot lines of lots 8 & 9.
Eleven lots (26% of the plat) are under the minimum 90 fo
o
t
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
a
t
the street , but meet the 90 foot width at the setback lin
e
s
.
The density of the proposed plat, 42 units on 22.95 gross
a
c
r
e
s
,
d
o
e
s
n
o
t
exceed the maximum density allowed of 2 units/acre.
SITE PLAN
The proposed grading of the site will reduce the existing
r
o
l
l
i
n
g
character of the site to gentler rolling land conducive to
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
development.
Preliminary review by the City Engineering Department of
t
h
e
w
a
t
e
r
,
s
t
o
r
m
water, and sanitary sewer plans is as follows:
1. Additional sewer and water stubs and associated ease
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
l
l
be required.
a. Between lots 4 and 5, block 5
b. Between lot 6, block 5 and the property to the west
These easements will provide service connection to the pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
to the south. Depending on whether the developer installs the
stubs concurrent with project utilities, the width of such
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
could be 30 feet or 40 feet if they are installed later.
2. Additional catch basins will be required, i.e., to s
e
r
v
e
b
l
o
c
k
s
5 and part of 6. (500' maximum drainage to catch basins)
3. The temporary dead-ends will require a temporary turn
a
r
o
u
n
d
s
w
i
t
h
necessary easements.
4. The storm sewer outfall located along the east proper
t
y
l
i
n
e
o
f
block 1, lot 1, should be extended to the rear property li
n
e
o
r
to the pond.
. . 5. The storm water holding pond located in Block 2, lots
1
-
3
,
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
redesigned so as to remove property lines from the pond an
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
for maintenance easements. The pond area could be designa
t
e
d
a
n
o
u
t
l
o
t
.
6. All basement elevations near the holding pond must b
e
a
t
l
e
a
s
t
2 feet above the water elevation.
Utility connection is all to the north and therefore depe
n
d
e
n
t
u
p
o
n
t
h
e
completion of Dell Road (and associated utilities) up to
D
u
c
k
L
a
k
e
Trail. The road and utility construction is anticipated
t
o
b
e
g
i
n
a
n
d
be completed during 1980.
The proponent's engineer should consult with fie City Engi
n
e
e
r
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
these, and possibly other changes, prior to drafting a fi
n
a
l
p
l
a
t
application.
Staff Report-Rymarland Camp tnd Addition -3- March 19, 1980
The revised plat conforms to recommendations in the MnDOT letter of Feb.
11, 1980 by reducing the number of lots adjacent to TH 101 , creating a
berm along TH 101, and providing additional right-of-way. As noted in
the letter, the proponent will be responsible for applying for an access
permit and constructing required turn lanes.
Nature Trail
The proposed nature trail along the abandoned railroad bed, adjacent to
the property's southeast boundary, has long been part of the City's overall
trail system and is part of a connection from TH 101 to Dell Road. The
developer should convey Outlot B to the City prior to issuance of any
building permits.
Cash Park Fee Payment
All lots will be subject to payment of the Cash Park Fee applicable at time
of building permit issuance. Presently, the amount is$325/lot.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the Rymarland Camp 2nd
Addition rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and preliminary platting of
42 lots based upon the following:
1. All lots should be brought up to ordinance minimum lot size of
13,500 square feet.
2. The utility plans should be modified to meet all recommendations
contained herein by the Engineering Department.
3. The developer must apply to the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed
District for a land alteration permit.
4. The developer must apply for an access permit from the State Highway
Department and install all necessary related improvements.
5. All lots shall be subject to payment of the cash park fee.
6. The City and Watershed District must be notified 48 hours in
advance of any grading or site work.
IM4 Ito Arr. Aw• 1.1.1.11 n••n J.•nn••• 10 PRCLIMINAler P4AT RYMAPLAND CAMP 2nd ADOIT/ON •14/LT Q1.1.444
Planning Commission Minutes -3- March 24, 1980
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Hakon Torjesen
Mr. Gertz, representing The Preserve, gavea brief presentation
explaining the changes in lot lines and the reasons for these changes.
The Commission had discussion regarding the impact of the
future Anderson Lakes Park way in this project.
Bearman asked for audience comments, there were none.
MOTION: Gartner moved, Retterath seconded to close the public
hearing. Motion carried 6 - O.
MOTION: Gartner moved, Retterath seconded to recommend to the
City Council approval of the Garrison replat of Lots 2, 3, and
Outlot I, Block 3, Garrison Forest 2nd Addition and Outlots, F,
G, and H according to the plat dated 3-3-80, per the staff
report dated 3-20-80. Motion carried 6 - O.
MOTION: Gartner moved, Retterath seconded to recommend to the
City Council approval of the vacation of easements along lot
lines of Lots 2, 3, and Outlot I, Garrison Forest 2nd Addition
according to the plat dated 3-3-80 and per the staff report
dated 3-20-80. Motion carried 6 - O.
C. PYMARLAND CAMP 2nd ADDITION, by Milt Quam. Request to rezone
22 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 and preliminary plat 42 lots
for single family detached homes. Located east of TH 101 and
south of Hidden Ponds Second Addition. A public hearing.
Rick Sather, McCombs-Knutson, gave a brief explanation of the
project explaining the changes in density.
Levitt inquired about the road systems, the road frontages and
the safety of the access onto highway 101.
Sather explained the road systems and the amount of land allowed
for their frontages. He stated that the projects main access
is onto highway 101.
Levitt inquired if any type of berming was planned for along
Dell Road for noise abatement.
The Planner stated that there are no plans at this time but
feels that something should be done for noise abatement.
The Commission also had concerns over the utility connections
and the safety of the recreational facilities.
Bev Behlmer, 18920 Pheasant Circle, stated that she still feels
that the access onto 101 is unsafe.
Charles Rockier, 19060 Deerfield Trail, inquired about the
recreational facilities stating that if the recreational facilities
In this project are to be private, there will be no public park
areas near the already existing homes.
Planning Commission Minutes -4- March 24, 1980
The Planner stated that this concern would be handled
through the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Com-
mission.
The Planner went over the recommendations of the staff report.
MOTION: Levitt moved, Sutliff seconded to close the public
hearing. Motion carried 6 - O.
MOTION: Levitt moved, Bentley seconded to recommend to the
City Council approval of Rymarland Camp 2nd Addition's
request to rezone from Rural to R1-13.5 according to the plat
dated 2-29-80 per the staff report dated 3-19-80 provided that
the following three items be added: Frontages be brought up
to a minimum of 90' of width at building setback; subject to
award of Dell Road/Valley View Road bid; and provided that
landscaping and berming be done to the satisfaction of the
staff for noise abatement. Motion carried 6 - O.
MOTION: Levitt moved, Bentley seconded to recommend to the
City Council approval of Rymarland Camp 2nd Addition's request
for preliminary platting of 42 lots according to the plat
dated 2-29-80 and per the staff report dated 3-19-80 provided
that the following three items be added: Frontages be brought
up to a minimum of 90' of width at building setback; subject
to award of Dell Road/Valley View Road bid; and provided that
landscaping and benning be done to the satisfaction of the
staff for noise abatement. Motion carried 6 - O.
D. CHERNE PUD & REZONING, by Lloyd Cherne. Request for PUD con-
cept approval on 66 acres for office, industrial, and multiple
residential uses; and rezoning and platting 5.5 acres from
Rural to 1-2 Park for construction of an office/warehouse
building. Located south of TUdorOaks and West of U.S. 169.
A public hearing.
Phil Pescola, Design Management, gave a brief presentation of the
proposed project, explaining the location and the building
structure.
Levitt inquired what type of use was proposed for this building.
Lloyd Cherne,owner, stated taht he plans this building to be
used as an office and manufacturing plant. He also stated that
he eventually plans this building to be completely office with-
out the manufacturing.
Bearman asked Where the development would obtain its access.
He also inquired about the road systems between this devel-
opment and Tudor Oaks.
Phil Pescola stated that this development would be obtaining
temporary access on Schooner Boulevard through Tudor Oaks and
would in the future have its permanent access on 169.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: April 4, 1980
SUBJECT: Development Proposal Check List
PROJECT: Rvmarland Camp 2nd Addition Revised
PROPONENT: Milt _Qt:p.in
REQUEST: Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for 22.95 acres
Preliminary platting of 42 lots and 1 outlet
LOCATION: East of TH 101 and South of Hidden Ponds
BACKGROUND: See Planning Staff Report dated March 19, 1980
CHECKLIST:
1. Adjacent to parks? (Neighborhood, Community, Regional)
No
Affect on park: N/A
2. Adjacent to public waters? No
Affect on waters:
N/A
there is a proposed trail along the abandons railroad bed.
3. Adjacent to trails? Ye s.
Type of trails: (bike, multi-use, transportation, etc.)
Construction: (asphalt, concrete, wood chips, aglime)__
multi-use
aglime
Width :6' Party Responsible for construction? city
Landownership: (dedicated, density tradeoff, etc.)
dedicated
Type of Development? (residential, commercial, industrial) residential
Where will CASH PARK FEE go? (what neighborhood) Hidden Ponds Park
Need for a mini-park?
-2-
5. REFERENCE CHECK:
a. Major Center Area Study: N/A
b. Neighborhood Facilities Study: Hidden Ponds Park located to the east
of this site is proposed to servo this neighborhood.
. Purgatory Creek Study: N/A
N/A
d. Shoreland Management Ordinance:
e. Floodplain Ordinance:
N/A
f. Guide Plan: The Guide Plan depicts this area as low density residential
g. Other:
6: Existing or pending assessments or taxes on proposed park property:
N/A
7. CASH PARK FEE? Fee applicable at time of building permit .should be paid.
8. Adjacent neighborhood type, and any neighborhood opinion voiced in favor or
against proposal: Same neighborhood sentiment in f-nfor of puhli , ,,wneorrh-ip
of Outlot A.
9. Number of units in residential development?
4, linitc
Number of acres in the project?
22.95 acres
Special recreation space requirements: The development ineludes_a_paxpos.ed
homeowner owned park that will contain the extsti
10. STAFF RECO>DWNDATIONS: Community Services Staff does not recommend public
ownership of the pool and tennis courts because of the size of the pool, the
condition of the tennis courts and the size of Outlot A. Community Services Staff
recommends approval as per Planning Staff Report of March 19, 1980 with the
following addition: #7. The developer shall dedicate Outlot 8 for public
trail use prior to building permit issuance:.
IQ (A
Minutes - Parks, Recreation &
.approved
April 7, 1980
Natural Resources Commission
-4-
R. Anderson asked what the water depth of the pond would be.
Uban gave the following depths:
Normal outflow 854 ft.
Bottom of pond 850 ft.
High water level 859 ft.
Trailway at 861 ft.
R. Anderson also asked who is responsible for control of
water depth. Uban said the pond would control itself nat
u
r
a
l
l
y
due in part to the proposed outflow structure.
Tangen said he is very excited about this trail, commends
t
h
e
developer, and feels it will be a real amenity to the City.
MOTION: Tangen moved to recommend to the Council approva
l
o
f
the Conyea PUD and waive cash park fees in lieu of park d
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
which includes the trail system. Pond seconded the motio
n
and it carried unanimously.
b. Camp Frontier (Wymarland Camp)
Thomas Bergquist, representing proponent Milt Quam, was
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
to request rezoning and preliminary platting of 42 lots an
d
1 outlet. He explained that the Outlet A is 1-1 acres, a
recreational area with a pool and tennis courts, which the
developer wants to be inthe Homeowners Association. The n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
s
to the north want the outlot purchased by the City for public use.
Lambert had two comments to suggest to the Commission on t
h
i
s
project:
(1) Staff does recommend accepting Outlot B which is a
proposed trail along the abandoned railroad bed leading i
n
t
o
Ridden Ponds Park.
(2) Staff would not recommend Outlet A for City park property
.
This 11- acres is ideal Homeowners Association property as
t
h
e
pool is only big enough for 40-50 homes and the tennis co
u
r
t
s
would need repairs for public use. Also, Hidden Ponds Pa
r
k
is only a few hundred feet away.
NOTION: D. Anderson moved to recommend the Council approve
t
h
e
Rymarland Camp 2nd Addition rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5
and preliminary platting of 42 lots based upon the followin
g
:
1) All lots should be brought up to ordinance minimum lot
size of 13,500 square feet.
2) The utility plans should ho modified to moot all recommendation
by the Engineering Department.
3) The developer must apply to the Riley-Purgatory Creek
Watershed District for a land alteration permit.
4) The developer must apply for an access permit from tho
State Highway Department and install all necessary relat
e
d
improvements.
12110
Minutes — Parks, Recreation & Approved
April 7, 1980
Natural Resources Commission
5) All lots shall be subject to payment of the cash park
fee.
6) The City and Watershed District must be notified 48 hours
in advance of any grading or site work.
7) Outlet B be dedicated as public trail.
Breitenstein seconded the motion and it carried unanimously.
DISCUSSION: Bergquist asked for clarification on cash park fee.
Lambert said $325 per single family unit or whatever the fee is
at the time the building permit is issued.
R. Anderson asked who owns the railroad land? Lambert replied
the adjacent property owners own to the center of the former railroad
R.O.W.
Co
oEsat
Minnesota
Departmei it of Transportation
ti District 5
„..,/.10 2055 No. Lilac Drive
February 11, 1980 (GU .) 545 ,3744
Mr. Cfiris Enger
Planning Director
Eden Prairie City Hall
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden lrairie, Minnesota 55344
In Reply Refer To: 315
SP 2736 R.H. 101
Plat review of Rymarland Camp 2nd Addition
located east of TM 101 and North of the old
Milwaukee Rd. RR in Outlot A and Lot 2, Block 1,
Rymarland Camp, City of Eden Prairie,
Hennepin County
Dear Mr. Enger:
We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. We find the
plat acceptable for further development with consideration of the following
comments:
- An entrance permit will be required for the proposed access to TM 101.
The developer should plan for turn lanes on TM 101 as a part of the
street development. A turn lane will be required when the entrance
permit is issued.
- We anticipate State daytime noise standards adjacent to TH 101 will be
exceeded. The development should be planned in such a way that the
effects from this are minimized. We suggest the use of building set
backs, use of local topography or establishment of earth berms be
investigated. It should be noted Mn/DOT will not provide any type of
noise attenuation for new developments adjacent to trunk highways.
- As we have suggested before on TM 101, the city should require the
developer to set aside additional right of way along TM 101 for
possible future improvements. In the past we have suggested an
additional 27 feet be platted for this purpose.
If you have any questions in regard to the above comments, please contact
our District Layout, Research and Development Engineer, Mr. J. S. Katz at
545-3761 extension 150. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
_
District Engineer
cc: Charles Weaver, Metropolitan Council
Gary Backer, Bonnepiu County Surveyor's Office
An Equal OppothoMy Employer
opioll Golden Valley, N .linnesota 55422
S in co -e ly
M. a.wfor , P.E 4
®
Sincerely,
Royert'C. Ohermeyer
BARR ENGINEERING CO:
Engineers for the District
Riley- Purgatory Creek Watershed District
8950 COUNTY ROAD 54
EDEN PRAIRIE. MINNESOTA 55343
February 13, 1980
Mr. Chris Enger
City Planner
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Re: Rymarland Camp Second Addition
Dear Mr. Enger:
The engineering advisors to the Board of Ma
n
a
g
e
r
s
o
f
t
h
e
R
i
l
e
y
-
P
u
r
g
a
t
o
r
y
Creek Watershed District has reviewed the pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
p
l
a
n
s
a
s
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
t
o
the District for the above referenced proje
c
t
.
T
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
a
n
d
criteria of the Watershed District are appl
i
c
a
b
l
e
t
o
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
1. The District notes that the wetland area in
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
the development site may be classified as pu
b
l
i
c
w
a
t
e
r
s
b
y
t
h
e
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
A
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
public waters and a natural ordinary highwat
e
r
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
m
u
s
t
b
e
established by the Minnesota Department of
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
.
Should development encroach below the natur
a
l
o
r
d
i
n
a
r
y
h
i
g
h
w
a
t
e
r
elevation, a Chapter 105 Work in Public Wat
e
r
s
P
e
r
m
i
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
required. In areas where development remai
n
s
a
b
o
v
e
t
h
e
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
ordinary highwater elevation, a Riley-Purga
t
o
r
y
C
r
e
e
k
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
District grading and land alteration permit
m
u
s
t
b
e
a
c
c
o
m
p
a
n
i
e
d
by an erosion control plan showing how sed
i
m
e
n
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
p
r
e
v
e
n
t
e
d
from leaving the development site both during
a
n
d
a
f
t
e
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
2. A detailed storm sewer plan must be submitte
d
t
o
t
h
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
f
o
r
review and approval.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on
t
h
i
s
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
I
f
y
o
u
have any questions regarding the District's
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
,
p
l
e
a
s
e
c
o
n
t
a
c
t
u
s
a
t
920-0655.
RC0/111
cc: Mr. Conrad Fiskness
M. Desyl Peterson
Mr. Jim Plocinik
CITY Of EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 80-90
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF RYMARLAND CAMP 2ND ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of .Rymarland Camp 2nd Addition
dated
Feb. 29, 1980 . a copy of which is attached hereto and amended
as follows:
is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie
Zoning and Platting ordinances and amendments thereto and is herein
approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of
19 .
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
John 0. Frane, City Clerk
SEAL
CARDARELLE 6 ASSOCIATES. INC.
"MO 1111WvIrVO••
640 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55304
941.3030
February 26, 1980
City of Eden Prairie
Mr. Chris Enger, City Planner
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Re: Rezoning of Frank Pobuda Property, 8123 Eden Road
Dear Chris:
As per the zoning process outline, following are answers to the pertinent questions on the zoning:
1. Ownership - The Frank Pobuda property purchased by
Cardarelle & Associates, Inc. on an option contract.
2. Developer - Cardarelle & Associates, Inc. for its home offices and rental to selected tenants.
3. Fiscal Economic - Intend to finance it privately.
4. Development Method - Upon approvals by the City,
construction of office to begin immediately.
5. - 7. Identify Boundaries, etc. - The boundaries as
per certificate of survey and location map of the
area.
8. Existing Land Use and Occupancy - Single family with
occupancy for single family home.
9. Existing Transportation Systems - Existing road
system and public transportation to Eilen Prairie Center.
10. Existing Zonings - Rlisingle family residential.
11. City Guide Plan Framework - This fits in with the City
guide plan framework.
12. Critical Public Decisions - Because of the odd shape of
the property, variances required to allow parking on
the set backs.
13. Additional General Project Information - Preliminary
site and building plan as shown.
13.I;
City of Eden Prairie
February 26, 1980 .
- Page 2
C. Site Area Analysis - 37,000 sq. ft.
1. Development Objectives - Build an office building
on site.
2. Site Plan - Preliminary site and building plan as shown.
3. Grading - Preliminary grading plan as enclosed.
4. Utility Plan - All utilities provided to the site.
5. Preliminary Architectural Drawings - As enclosed.
6. Legal Instruments for Plan Implementation - None needed.
7. Housing or Land/Building Use Profile - The land use and
building square footage as per prelinminary building plan.
8. Zoning Classification and/or Variations from City
Ordinances - We are requesting the toning classification
be changed from RV to office. The variances required
will be the parking variance within the setback as per
the preliminary site plan.
9. Phasing and Construction Schedule - A schedule of com-
pletion of the building six months after City approvals.
10. Additional Information - Any additional information .
furnished upon request.
Sineerely,(,,
ank,R. Ca darelle
e'
FRC:mw
Minnesota
Dwain -nem of 'Dal isi)( glink)n
District 5
2055 No. Lilac Drive
Golden Valley, Nlinnesola 35422
March 26, 1980
Mr. Chris Enger, Planning Director
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
In Reply Refer To: .315
S.F.. 2744 T.H: 169/212
Plat Review of Cardarelle Office Building
located in N.M. Quadrant of TB 169/212 and
Eden Road in part of Lot 16 Auditors Subdivision
No 335 in Eden Prairie
Hennepin County
Dear Mr. Eager:
We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and
Surveys. find the plat acceptable for further development.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. .
' /
/ j i 7 /
/ , I
../
W. M. Crawford, P.E.
District Engineer
.Charles Weaver
Metropolitan Council
301 Metro Square Building
7th and Robert Streets
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Gary Rocker
Hennop]n Co. Surveyor's Office
ilenhepin C ,J. Government Center
300 SUth 6th Street
A-703
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487
Sincerely;
CC:
1.0.+1 Oppo ,nintry Emplo)c,
Planning Commission Minutes -5- March 24, 1980
The Commission also had concerns over the elevation drop on
the proposed roads, the sloping within the development site,
and the amount of truck traffic this development would have.
MOTION: Gartner moved, Retterath seconded to continue this
item to the April 14, 1980 meeting. Motion carried 6 - O.
MEMBERS
ABSENT:
Halton
Torjesen
E. CARDARELLE A ASSOC. INC. OFFICE, request to rezone .8 acres from
Rural to Office and setback variances. Located in the Major Cen-
ter Area, east of Eden Road and west of 169, at 8123 Eden Road.
A public meeting.
Mr. Cardarelle gave a brief explanation of his request. He
explained the location and shape of his site, the type of
building proposed and the proposed parking area.
Levitt inquired about the road systems and where this project
would obtain its access.
Cardarelle replied that access would be completely from Eden
Road.
Bentley inquired if this project met the City's setback
requirements.
The Planner replied that a waiver was being sought to allow
parking within the frontyard setbacks.
The Commission also had concerns over the signage and the
building of the retaining walls.
Mr. Cardarelle stated that he would build all retaining walls.
and provide sidewalk easements.
The Planner went over the recommendation of the staff report
dated 3-20-80.
MOTION: Bentley moved, Retterath seconded to recommend to the
City Council approval of the request by Cardarelle & Assoc.
Inc. Office for rezoning of .8 acres from Rural to Office
District with setback variances according to the plan dated
2-25-80 and the recommendations of the staff report dated
3-20-80 provided that the following item be added: Cardarelle
to build retaining walls and provide sidewalk easements along
T.H. 169 and Eden Road.
F. ROSEMOUNT ENGINEERING, request to vacate excess right-of-way
along the south side of West 78th Street.
MOTION: Gartner moved, Retterath seconded to recommend to
the City Council vacation of the excess right-of-way along
the south side of West 78th Street. Motion carried 6 - 0.
VII. OLD BUSINESS - None
VIII. NEW BUSINESS - None
IX. PLANNER'S REPORT - None
X. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Gartner moved, Bentley seconded to adjourn the meeting
at 11:00. Motion carried 6 - O. ahe
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PROJECT:
PROpONENT:
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commi
s
s
i
o
n
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
April 4, 1980
Development Proposal Check List
Cardarelle Office Building
Cardarelle and Associates, Inc.
REQUEST: Rezoning of approximately 3/4 of an
a
c
r
e
o
f
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
f
r
o
m
R
u
r
a
l
to Office
District with setback variances.
LOCATION: West of Eden Prairie Center on 169/
2
1
2
BACKGROUND: See Planning Staff Report
CHECKLIST;
1. Adjacent to parks? (Neighborhood, Community,
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
)
No
Affect on park: N/A
2. Adjacent to public waters? No
Affect on waters:
N/A
3. Adjacent to trails? Possible future trail requirement from south
t
o
n
o
r
t
h
depending on the type of development that occur
s
.
i
n
t
h
i
s
area.
Type of trails: (bike, multi-use, transporta
t
i
o
n
,
e
t
c
.
)
Pedestrian
Construction: (asphalt, concrete, wood chips
,
a
g
l
i
m
e
)
Concrete
Width: 5' Party Responsible for construction? City
Landownership: (dedicated, density tradeoff, e
t
c
.
)
Dedicated Easement
Type of Development? (residential, commercial,
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
)
flf fice
Where will CASH PARK FEE go? (what neighborho
o
d
)
-•
Need forO mini-park? No
S. REFERENCE CHECK:
a. Major Center Area Study:
would include office use.
B. Neighborhood Facilities Study: N/A
c. Purgatory Creek Study: N/A
d. Shorcland Management Ordinance: N/A
e. Floodplain Ordinance: Illustrates as Regional Commercial
f. Guide Plan:
g. Other:
6. Existing or pending assessments or taxes on proposed park property: N/A
7. CASH PARK FEE? Shall be paid at time of building permit.
8. Adjacent neighborhood type, and any neighborhood opinion voiced in favor or
against proposal:
9. hhunber of units in residential development? N/A
Number of acres in the project?
3/4
Special recreation space requirements: N/A
10. STAFF RECOMENDATIONS: Recommend approval as per Planning Staff Rep:art
of March 20, 1980.
'40
Minutes - Parka, Recreation &
approved
April 7, 1980
Natural Resources Commission
-5-
5) All lots shall be subject to payment of the cash park
foe.
6) The City and Watershed District must be notified 48 hours
in advance of any grading or site work.
7) Outlet B be dedicated as public trail.
Breitenstein seconded the motion and it carried unanimously.
DISCUS5ION: Berequist asked for clarification on cash park fee.
LaMbert said 8325 per single family unit or whatever the fee in
at the time the building permit is issued.
R. Anderson asked who owns the railroad land? Lambert replied
the adjacent property owners own to the center of the former railroad
e. Cardarelle and Associates, Inc. Office
Frank Cardarelle was present to request rezoning of approximately
3/4 acre from Rural to Office District with setback variances.
He plans to build approximately an 8,000 sq. ft., 2 story building
to house his ova office and lease to others. Easements will be
provided for walkways.
Tangen asked if and when the City would oonstruct walkways on
this site. Lambert replied that the easements are there but no
walkways will be built until the City knows more what other
types of development will be in that area.
MOTION: Tangen moved to recommend that the Council approve the
rezoning from Rural to Office District with setback variance°
as recommended in Planning Staff Report dated March 20, 1980.
D. Anderson seconded the motion and it carried unanimously.
2. 1979 AnnualReport
Lambert presented the report for the Commission's information.
3. Comprehensive Park Plan (cont. from March 17)
Lambert pointed out that the Comprehensive Park Plan is part of a
"guide plan"--nothing is concrete but the purpose is to give direction.
This should be updated every year to be accurate. Lambert remarked
that he has the master copy, makes notes when additionn, changes or
deletions occur, so at the end of the year the Staff will update
from that information.
YOTIOM: Tangen moved to recommend that the Comprehensive Park Plan
be reviewed annually, the firnt meeting in December. Breitenstein
seconded the motion and it carried unanimously.
DISC=O: R. Anderson said it would help, when a developer comes in
with a trail proposal or whatever, if the Commission could see how
it would affect other trails and the community as a whole. It would
be helpful to have a permanent map in the chamber for this purpouo.
A 5 minute recess wan °ailed at 8:55 p.m.
In I
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
PROJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
Planning Commission
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
May 9, 1980
AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE PHASE 2 BUILDING
Rauenhorst Corporation
Directly west of American Family Insurance
existing building .
BACKGROUND
The 1979 request for PUD Concept approval by Rauenhorst was for a
50,000 sq.ft. addition to the existing Americaa Family Insurance and
a 75,000 sq.ft. third building to be constructed on the west end of the
site.
The Planning Commission recommendation was to, " recommend approval of the
Opus II Office Center PUD as per the material dated June 18, 1979 and the
staff report of July 5, 1979 with the following modification: a strong
recommendation that any further parking development on the site incorporate
the use of a parking ramp to decrease parking coverage of the area".
The staff report of July 5, 1979 contained the following recommendations:
1. Providing detailed existing vegetation survey information as a part of
the rezoning process.
2. Providing adequate setbacks as detailed in this report.
3. Providing clearly defined areas of connection for pedestrian
system to the overall pedestrian system of Opus II.
4. Cash park fee be paid at time of building permit issuance.
5. As part of rezoning submittal information, adequate additional
area be shown to illustrate parking ratio up to parking spaces
of 5 per thousand.
6. In the detailed information submitted for rezoning, proPer siting
of buildings to preserve maximum amount of vegetation should be required.
7. Additional study by Rauenhorst in submission of material to provide
clear definition of car circulation to provide access to one-way overall
road system should be submitted.
8 Strong recommendation that any further parking development on the site
incorporate the use of a parking ramp to decrease parking coverage
of this area.
1.272-
Staff Report-American Family Ins.Ph 2 Bldg
May 9, 1980
page 2
1. As a part of the current request, the major trees have been surveyed
and included on the plan. This second building and parking will not
adversely impact major vegetation.
2. Setbacks have been altered to the required 50 feet from the Crosstown.
3. The building is connected through the existing American Family building;
no additional pedestrian systems are indicated.
4. The cash park fee will be paid.
5. The Building Department and Planning Department have reviewed the parking
requirements of the existing and proposed building and find adequate
parking provided.
6. The proposed building has been well sited to protect existing vegetation
Phase 3, however will need to be carefully sited, as it has potential
for greatest impact upon vegetation.
7. The access to this Phase has been modified so that there is a loop road
connecting the site with east bound Yellow Circle Drive and west bound
Blue Circle Drive. The internal parking lot circulation has been mode more
direct.
8. The third phase will require most sensitivity in siting to protect
existing vegetation.
Also, as part of the PUD process, the proponent is requesting a waiver
to allow no sideyard setback to the common property line between the
two buildings.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request from Rural
to Office District according to the Plans dated April 30, 1980.
CE:jj
Planning Commission Minutes -4- May 12, 1980
MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Bearman, Hakon Torjesen
C. SUPERAMERICA STATION at Co.Rd. 4 and TM 5. Request to rezone 1.3 acres
'from Plan Study to Highway Commercial for construction of a convenience
store and gas station. Located in the Southwest corner of 1115 and Co.Rd.4.
A public meeting.
Continued to June 9, 1980 under Approval of Agenda.
•
D. AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE PHASE 2 BUILDING,by Rauenhorst Corporation. Request
to rezone approximately 3 acres from Rural to Office. Located west of present
building at 6131 Blue Circle Drive. A public meeting.
Mr. Robert Worthington, Rauenhorst Corporation, stated the approved 1979 PUD
illustrates the phase 2 expansion, but between the concept stage and detail
plan drawing things got ahead of themselves and it was assumed by them and the
City building department that the site was zoned for the phase 2 construction,
and a footing permit was issued prior to actual zoning of the additional
acreage. He apologized for the circumstances and assured the commission that
concerns raised during the PUD review have been met in the design of phase 2.
He stated the building would have 3 stories, be constructed of brick , have the
same windows as the first building, have a skyway connection,and the proposed
parking preserves stands of oak trees.
The Planner reviewed the staff report outlining how Rauenhorst has met each of
the commission's concerns expressed during review of the PUD.
Sutliff inquired how many acres are remaining in the Opus PUD. Mr. Worthington
replied after rezoning of these 3 acres, approximately 4.5 acres remain (phase 3).
Levitt asked if the coverage of the site meets requirements under Ord. 135.
The Planner replied affirmative.
Levitt then asked how many parking spaces will be provided in phase 2. Mr. Mike
Ryan, Rauenhorst, replied 144 spaces.
The commission then discussed the continuation of construction, setbacks needed,
and the inclusion of a ramp in the design of phase 3.
Motion
Levitt moved, Gartner seconded, to recommend to the City Council approval of the
rezoning from Rural to Office as per the plans dated April 30, 1980 and the staff
report of May 9, 1980. Motion carried unanimously.
V. OLD BUSINESS
Levitt- moved, Gartner seconded, to cancel the regularly scheduled meeting of
May 26, 1980 ( Memorial Day ). Motion carried unanimously.
VI. NEW BUSINESS None
VIII. ?TANNER'S REPORT
The Planner breifed the Commission on the Edenbrooke project which may be
submitting an application to rezone the property from multiple family to
single family and that the City is pursuing changing the location of Dell Road
within the project area.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT. Gartner moved,Bentley seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 10:40 PM.
Motion carried.
Yours truly,
RAUENHOUT '5RP0RATION
Mike Ry
Project Manager
MR :j1
RALIERINORST CORPORATIOrtin
DESIGNERS • BUILDERS • DE YELOPIRS/MINNEAPOLIS • CHICAGO • MILWAUKEE •"4. 7N•
May 5,.1980
Mr. Chris Enger
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55436
Re: American Family Insurance
6131 Blue Circle Drive
New Addition
Dear Chris:
This is to confirm our telephone conversation on Thursday, May 1,
regarding our zoning application on the referenced project.
Our zoning application will include a request for a variance
or waiver allowing the construction of the new building addition
along the existing property line. American Family Insurance is
the owner of both lots and will occupy both buildings.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in handling this
matter. Please advise me if any futher action or information
is required from us.
TCuTHI. 0, /CAS :200 NORTHWf STOUT TINANCHT. CIATT H. 7900 TUXES MAMA SOUTH. UilTHESPOTAS, TUHNTSOTA S.Sn11 5T21 t34,®
1.21S
By
DO
z,lOttr ‘13D W. ANDERSON
DEVcLOPER
May 7, 1980 '
Rauenhorst Corporation
Northwestern Financial Center
Suite 2200
Minneapolis, Mn. 56431
Attention Robert J. Dahlin, President
Dear Mr. Dahlin:
We at ADI are totally in favor of construction of the American Family
Insurance Building in Opus II.
We will look forward to their growth in this area.
-
Yours very truly,
Richard W. Anderson, inC.
RWA/PP
cc City of Eden Prairie/Chris Enger
9995W. 69th St.
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 127 6
ix4'7 461-
May 6, 1980
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO R80-86
RESOLUTION SETTING HEARING FOR
APPEAL OF DECISION OF BOARD OF
APPEALS & ADJUSTMENTS, VAR. #80-9
WHEREAS, the Board of Appeals and Adjustments on April 17, 1980, .
denied certain rear yard setback variances for Lots 2 and 3, Block I, proposed
Garrison Forest 4th Add., and
WHEREAS, The Preserve has filed with the City a written request
asking the City Council to review said denial.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council
•that a public hearing on said matter shall be held at 7:30 P.M. on Tues.,
May 20, 1980. The City Clerk shall give published and mailed notice of
such meeting.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST
SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
Me reserve
April 21, 1980
Eden Prairie City Council
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Atten: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
Ladies and Gentlemen:
On April 17 the Board of Appeals and Adjustments denied our request for variance
from the 50' rear yard setback requirements of the Garrison Forest Second
Addition rezoning Agreement (this area is being replattea, so we are requesting
variances on Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Garrison Forest Fourth Addition).
The owner of lot 3 still wants to place his house on the corner lot and there-
fore we are requesting you to grant the variances. Specifically the request is
for a reduction to 41 feet on lot 3 and 38 feet on lot 2. To refresh your
memory I have attached copies of some of the prior information supplied.
The reasons for this variance request are as follows:
1 - The 50' rear yard and 30' front yard setback would only allow an 18'
deep house on lot 3 and a 23' deep house on lot 2. While this is
possible, we felt it was better to have houses on these lots that ao
not require unique designs.
2 - The rear yard setbacks will still exceed the 20' requirements of
Ordinance 135.
3 - The topography of the lots allow for any berms and landscaping nece-
ssary to buffer the rear yards from the roadway.
4.- The land on the other side of Anderson Lakes Parkway is County Park
and therefore no future residential construction would be affected.
5 - The topography, vegetation and pond along the south side of the
existing road would suggest that it would be more economic and less
disruptive if the future expansion of Anderson Lakes Parkway would
be to a 4 lane undivided road rather than a dividea parkway. If this
is true the house to curb distance would be approximately the same as
the rest of the Parkway.
Cont'd. on Page 2
1,2,1Y IA
• rd.... 447Jd • In171 419101
THE PRZSERVE
ee W. Johnson
Vice President - Engineering
Eden Prairie City Council
Page 2
6 - The apprwal would accommodate the owner of a quality built house and
resolve the use of these lots.
7 - Old Outlot I was wide enough for two lots but this question was de-
ferred at the time of rezoning. We have decided not to request a
subdivision and ask for only one house on the corner lot.
This area has been a point of disagreement between us for some time. To
resolve this in a fair and equitable manner, we urge your favorable consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
LWJ/j1
cc: Emmett Johnson
Attachments
••
*A •
1 1,
Pwww44 Moonwn
Law.
; 1
nn•n••••:••••• •••=roole
0
he Preserve
11111 Andrison LAMS Parkway
ition Prairw,kwuwor.414 56344
(612) 041.200 1
so .
4444rwarr lakie
Pork
Oaks
• in* • ...y et • 1."• air g linadilnese oAr
• - Hills
11\
A I
Lt_t_r
€ Y.0.1.40
4,910
• •••
n.r
30 0 30
'1=1"•`.
SCALE IN FEET
0 DELOTE5 !Rau mouumair
AS DESC.215e0 AtriOul .
NOTE:
24. LONG IRON NONUAIENT ANO
IDENTIFICATXN4 tXSC{ACTUAL Sae
SET AT AU- POINTS INOICATIDn
MINN. REEL LAND SURVEYOR #7095
ismdf certify *es This worts rot or gotwoo
is Po. Or uaisr s Silosl s4pormos, cal
Me I thIt o dels leVp florid Ism/ St. rrrew
tritrIff lAo lows of as Stet* if Mamosulo.
Dols Z ? f6Lieft,g, No.p76,4z.
si 7,46T OO
15 5-1
t L ITY0-5-t"A"'"-
1.21 .1441,9•
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
• FOR
THE PRESERVE
LOT 3 .0L0CK I ) GARRISOI.I FoResr FOURTH APDITIOA.1
IfEVIVEPIN CO, Ml). *
Pe sACARC SO.
...V. Is.
NM W.I.., • +I I ..411.".11 $1.4
h.* •Y l••
0 30
SCALE IN FEET
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
• FOR
• THE PRE5ERVE
• LOT ESLOCk GRovsoo FoRtsr FOURTH A1,0/770A)
HeANEPO.) CO. MA),
ffr 13 ,,(,) •
7700 14,2
e2 .0
0 DEPOTES MOP PloPUMEAJTS
AS DE5CRI8E0 BELOW
2e LONG MON 6.10kUref.MT AND
IDENTIFICAPON (34SC (ACTUAL (.42E)
SET AT ALL PONTS LOCATED.
WM. REQ. LAMP SltfiVev0,4 #7095
05
4% u lit 1_77*
"-T-- 02#'1
/ • t>=1 2
• 1a-;12-1'4
0 .:4;73
rzottas•
try;
,144,
• 1311515 frg BEAZIPGS IS ASSOMFD
I etethr calf* thaf thlt stem+ rat elope/ad
ày ma, Of ("MI my direct saperlsloa, oat,
thet l or a duly Replthreti Lund .9.vre7er
antler the low S MI Pets al Mew:0C
a‘r;:enro"--‘•—•"•-eX-
Da. ZZL1± taw. Ate._67:4'94
0,1•1
• TheLirescrve
. .Eden Prairie City Council
•.Eden Prairie Planning Commission
• Ladies and Gentlemen:
• The Preserve has been approached by two owners of pre-built Vo-Tech homes who desire
. to place them on Lot 2, Block 3, and Outlot I of the current Garrison Forest Second
Addition. These houses equal or exceed the size and quality of the existing houses
in the subdivision. They also will be occupied by the petitioners and are not
speculative. •
.' The lots in Garrison Forest Second Addition are basically 70' to 77' Wide with areas
that range from 8400 sq. ft. to 24, 258 sq. ft. The proposed houses are 72' wide
"• and therefore will not fit on Lot 2, Block 3. After careful study and a number of
' meetings with the City staff it was decided that the best solution would be to move
. the lot lines between Lots 2 and 3, and between Lots 3 and Outlot I easterly enough
• 'to accommodate the house. .Cutlot I is sufficiently wide enough to absorb these
' changes. The frontages on Garrison Way after the shift exceed those in the rest of
the subdivision and the area of the new middle lot, at 8,654 sq. ft., still falls
Within the range of the subdivision.
'Since this is only a shift in lot lines ) there is no change in the number of dwelling
Also since the lots are already platted and no land, is being added or deleted
..',“rom the overall plat we are submitting this as a replat of the affected portion of
:Garrison Forest Second Addition into Garrison Forest Fourth Addition.
::For your information we have concomitantly made the following requests:
' 1 - Petitioned the Board of Appeals and Adjustment for moving permits for these
two houses according to Ordinance 79-34. The public hearing is scheduled
for, April 17, 1980. ,
.2 - Petitioned the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for approval of variance
' from the 50' rear yard setback requirement from Anderson Lakes Parkway for
Lots 2 and 3 of the replatted Garrison Forest Fourth Addition. This
•hearing is also scheduled for April 17, 1980.
- Petitioned the City Council for vacation of the drainage and utility ease-
..! ments along the lot lines being shifted. Easements on an existing plat
, cannot be just shifted. They must be formally vacated and then reestab-
':lished on the replat. The hearing has been requested for April 1, 1980.
,
• -4 - Requested action by the City Council on April 1 or April 15, 1980 on the'
Garrison Fourth Addition Final Plat. This would be subject to preliminary
:":.plat approval by the Planning Commission.
i <xi i-vyti
HE PRESERVE
Lee W. John
Vice President - Engineering
LW/j1
Page 2
Eden Prairie City Council
Eden Prairie Planning Commission
We urge your prompt consideration of this because the owners of the houses a
r
e
under restrictive time constraints to remove the houses from the Vo-Tech pro
p
e
r
t
y
.
We urge your favorable consideration because this would determine the actual us
e
of these three lots. There is uncertainty and apprehension in the neighborhood
-
regarding these lots. This action would finalize the use and would give a s
o
d
d
e
d
,
landscaped, residential entrance to the subdivision.
Respectfully submitted,
Enclosures: Location map
2 - Garrison Forest Second Addition Plat
3 - Garrison Forest Fourth Addition replat
4 - Lot surveys of the houses on the Fourth Addition
1234 farA
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Variance # 80-9
APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE THROUGH 7ILE
ZONING DWG) OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS
PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 77-6 AND NU. 135
DATE.
APPLICANT'S NAME The Preserve ;..
ADDRESS 11111 Anderson Lakes Parkway
Eden Prairie, MN, ZIP 55344
mon 941-1059
DESCRIPTION or VARIANCE ilrgunsT (attach 8 1/2 X 11 drawing)
see attached letter and exhibits -
4,
Reduction in 50'ii.ear yard setback requirement from
Anderson Lakes Parkway
LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND STREET ADDRESS OF PROPERTY.
Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Garrison Forest Fourth Addition
9230 and_9240 Garrisnn Way
APPLICANTS SIGNAIURE.
FEE $25.00 PAID 4 RECEIPT 9/4 k5-
gill- 10o1 -
E1.2.)
The reserve
February 27, 1980
Board of Appeals and Adjustments
• City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Gentlemen:
Attached are site surveys for 2 lots in the Garrison Forest Fourth Addition
in The Preserve. We are requesting a variance from the 50' setback require-
ment from Anderson Lakes Parkway. We are requesting this variance because:
1'- The 50' rear yard and 30' front yard setbacks would only allow an
18' deep house on the corner lot and a 23' deep house on the second
lot.
2 - The rear yard setbacks will still exceed the 20' requirements of
Ordinance 135 and the Zoning Ayreemenl.
3 - The topography of the lots allows for the berms and landscaping
necessary to buffer the rear yards from the roadway.
4 - The land on the other side of Anderson Lakes Parkway is County
Park and therefore there will be no future residential construction
that would be affected.
Please give the required notice through mailings and publication so that
this can be considered at your March 20th meeting.
•• Respectfully submitted,
THE PRESERVE
160
Lee W. Job on
Vice President - Engineering
LWJ/il
Attachments
tac)(p 490
THE • • 4.1 WI 0.0 " tit Cl) s" (CI It Sr( °I 42: " 09 to) (64.0 C 60 , 15.35 •A=87°55'46' R=10.00 Oa" 2 vt. ,e) \ 00 ‘,.6\ f::•f 8.0 05V A9 "- 4 d 8' k 4, 0- D- .• cE5CC. • z_p) Os O't
UZI Fif1.0 LIOCX: PAGE:.
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
FOR
Tli5 PRE .3.512/E
LOT2, SLOCk I GRR21 50)0 FORt5T FOuRTH ADDIT/OAJ
tremvEPII) CO. NW. IA
:Y
• ,42 0 11)
5777 ,OZ.3
0 DEPOTES 1120IU tolOPUMEOTS
AS DESCRICEO 8Ecow
NOTE :
24 LONG WON MONUMENT AND
)otNlolCATION 014C (ACTUAL Slit!)
5/1 AT ALL POINTS INNCATED.
Mune REG. LAND SURVIVOR •7095
5/4515 role DE.721P6S IS CISSUMaD
:n ,,!/•,. Drpr v
4./ n...624.1d
30 0 30
italabaiamaailrr rlu"'"2:".1
SCALE IN FEET
...• ,,,,, asn ••
soy *4 IVO WO
z
bendy certify &el this surrey WI plipefed
by nye, or under my direct inparrhoon, and
Mal / on aAd, Reinelered Gond Sbrr•yar
under Me /ors a Ms Stom d ihnhesolO.
Ylf
'156 Fog sen,ehu65 1$ ASSUMED.
•
A= 87°55'4,1" n
R=io.00
— /5.35
o DEA.OTES IR04,1 MODUNIEVT
AS 4045c/2431'D arlexa
24 LONG IRON MONUMENT AND
IDENTIFICATION DISC (ACTUAL San
SET AT ALL POINTS INDICATED,
;MN* REG. LAND SURVEYOR *1091
/Array. codify Mot Mit No VII atif prrporoff
if ow, or under Ay direr! swerirva, 9A0
thol am o of* Ropstsritr/ Lund Slartror
ono's, Me 10.1 of IA* Pols of Aloons3oto.
,••••••• •
Dole 2 2 fe,Z;,trefp so.
I DRAWN
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
FOR
THE PRE SE R /E
LOT 3 aLo.sk I j GARRIE04/ ropz ,,w Foc,ram RpL ,,Tio,v
IfEMVEPhu
41,1 ,13DR U
••••••all An.•
sho •fi "a
0 No , -3a-29
30 0 30
bSMi.veoleu
SCALL IN FEET
'FIELD BMX , PAGE:
z:4427
1. Application received b y ,:intaem/ 091 (4'7(_..., Date
2. Fee $25.00 Paid "ze(!rai. 7' 7/6 5—
3. Ordinance Provision (O. which applies 774 t0)44,0_ elrip414
L14,
11VA So s miA:li 4 ' k, uk, ft
P11,
4. Date to be considered b y Board
5. Mail notice to propert y owners within 500 feet of subject propert y at least 10 da y s
before hearin g date. Date mailed.
o
6. Staff recommendation:
Prior to the final plattin g of Garrison Forest 2nd Addition, the Preserve
constructed certain utility lines and streets which dictated the street
location for Garrison Wa y which abutts the south side of the subject lots.
Apparentl y the Preserve was unaware of the City 's usual re q uirement of a
50' setback from State, County , and NSA roads. Anderson Lakes Parkwa y is
an NSA (Muncipal State Aid) road with a projecte
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
v
o
l
u
m
e
o
f
o
v
e
r
8,000 trips per da y and therefore the 50' setback was re q uired by the City
Council. • •
There is a hardship in this case because the lot
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
e
s
s
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
y unbuildable
g iven the re q uired 50' setback. .There are factors as pointed
o
u
t
i
n
M
r
.
J
o
h
n
s
o
n
'
s
letter of 2/27/80 which will lessen an y ne g ative impacts if the re q uested
variance is g ranted. There is ample opportunity in the rear y ards for bermin g
and plantin g s to help screen the future houses from traffic
o
n
A
n
e
r
s
o
n
L
a
k
e
s
P
k
w
y .
Recommend approval of variance re q uest #80-9 allowin g a 38' setback for 12. 81
( and a 41' setback for L3, 131 Garrison Forest 4th
.
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
s
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
d
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
south line of Outlots B and C, Garrison Forest 4t
h
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
.
pate of Publication "WiJ
rX)12.-1\
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS
THURSDAY, April 17, 1980
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL
7:30PM, CITY HALL
Chairman James Wedlund, Roger
Sandvick, and James Dickey
Ronald Krueger and Richard Lynch
Carl Jullie, P.E. Director of
Public Works and Sharon Gagnon,
Recording Secretary
1. Election of Officers.
MOTION: Sandvick moved to postpone the election of officers until
the next regular meeting. Wedlund seconded; motion carried unanimously.
2. Minutes of March 20, 1980 regular meeting.
MOTION: Hedlund moved to postpone the approval of the March 20th minutes
due to a lack of quorum until the next regular scheduled meeting. Dickey
seconded. motion carrieo unanimously.
3. Variance Request 480-9 submitted ty the Preserve to allow a rear yard
setback less than 50 for Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 Garrison Forest 4th Addition.
John Hissink, chairman for the Design Review Committee of the Preserve,
explained the history of the lots. He stated that these lots were originally
Lots 2 & 3 and Outlot I of Block 3, Garrison Forest 2nd. This is presently
being replatted to Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, of Garrison 4th Addition.
Rear yard variances are needed for Lots 2 and 3 since 50' is required from
Anderson Lakes Parkway per the development agreement for Garrison Forest 2nd Add.
Jullie noted this would allow a 38' setback for Lot 2, Block 1 and 41'
setback for Lot 3, Block 1. These lots are essentially unabuildable with
the required 50' setback.
Dickey questioned if the three requested items on the agenda are interrelated.
Hissink said that the items are related because the house moving requests
are for two of these lots.
Wedlund noted that if the Board should give approval to the rear setback
variance it would not indicate that the other items were also approved.
John Dougherty, 9250 Garrison Way, explained that his home was on a lot
bordering the lots requesting the house moving permits, and presented a
petition to the Board. He noted in the second paragraph of the petition
that they also opposed the variance from the 50' setback. He stated that
he had called Mr. Peterson of the Preserve and was told that the lots
42.-AZ
-2-
Dd. of Appls 8 Adj. - unapproved April 17, 1980
were unbuildable. Doughtery stated he did not know if this was a fact but
felt the Preserve had created a poor design in the original plat and now
want to be bailed out at the expense of the house owners by cramming the houses.
Hedlund questioned if the Preserve had any other plans other than moving
the houses on these lots.
Hissink replied that he was not aware of any at this time. He pointed out
that only one house moving request is contingent on this variance approval.
Lot 1 does not need a rear yard variance. The replat is moving the lot
lines easterly adding to lots 1 and 2, decreasing lot 3 of Garrison 4th.
Wedlund asked if the City Council vacated Outlet I.
Jullie stated that the Preserve owned Outlot I and it was never donated
to the City.
Thomas Pooton, 9380 Garrison Way, stated that he had purchased his home
over a year ago from Ban-Con because of the concept that all the homes
would be built by the same builder. He explained there were problems in
the area. One of these was a storm sewer that was staked incorrectly by
BRW and later BRW was forced to purchase the lot since it was unbuildable.
He stated that he was told a berm would be built high enough to screen
the Eden Prairie Center and a traffic light would be installed, both of
which have not been done. He also stated that the Learning Tree Center
had wished to purchase these lots but only if the Center met with the
approval of the neighbors. The people turned down their request in order
to preserve their concept of the area. He said he had looked at the
homes at Vo Tech to be moved and felt they would not fit in with the
other Ban-Con homes.
Hedlund said he had looked at this area and felt the intersection was
dangerous. He questioned Jullie in regard to the projection of traffic
on Anderson Lakes Parkway.
Jullie stated that Anderson Lakes Parkway is a Municipal State Aid road
with a projection of 8,000 trips a day. At the present it seems that only
minor widening in approximately 5-10 years will become necessary and that
will be based on the availability of traffic funds. This may not be
for several years if the decrease in the size of the cars and the consumption
of gas continues. The ultimate plan would allow for a four lane divided
road with a median.
Dougherty questioned how far were the proposed homes from Anderson Lakes Pkwy.
Jullie stated that the rear yard setbacks for Lot 2 is 38' and Lot 3 is 41'
pus the area that would be the boulevard.
Ralph Hanson, 9925 Garrison Way, stated that he had approached the City Council
when Super Valu was being planned because of the traffic problem of not
seeing cars coming over the ridge. He was opposed to the project because
of a compound of various problems.
Hissink stated that he felt the distance Problem will be corrected after the
1.30)-
-3-
Bd. of Appls. & Adj. unapproved
April 17, 1980
road is widened and the traffic light installed. He noted that Garrison
Forest I was developed first and it is south of Garrison Forest 2nd. The
access to Garrison Forest 2nd was established at the time of the platting
of Garrison Forest I. Later the Preserve discovered that the right of
way was 50' instead of 33' because of Anderson Lakes Pkwy.
Dickey questioned Dougherty regarding what he was told by the Preserve.
Hissink noted that the Preserve could not control the square footage of
a home but considered the harmony in design and topography. ha presented
the Board with a comparison sheet showing the total living area of the
homes in the neighborhood and noted that only two other homes have more
square feet. He explained that Ban-Con does not build a rambler.
Dickey felt that the size was not the issue.
Wedlund questioned why this issue was before the Board rather than the
Planning Commission.
Jullie stated that the City Council had approved the preliminary plat a
couple of weeks eeeo. The new plot will shift the lot lines which will decrease
the size of Outlet I, but will make the other lots larger.
Sandvick noted this problem goes back to the Preserve unanware of the
50' setback set forth by the City and the additional right of way needed.
Jullie stated that federal funds were used for Anderson Lake Park and the
City could not take any land for Anderson Lakes Pkwy. The land had to be
taken from the south side of the road but the streets and utilities for
Garrison Forest 2nd were already in and therefore creating the problem.
Sandvick noted that the projected trips on the parkway was 8,000 trips but
possibly more could be anticipated.
Pooton expressed concern for egress and ingress to the shopping center.
MOTION: Wedlund, seconded by Dickey, moved to deny variance request 80-9
since the findings indicate a better solution could be found. Buildina on
Lot 3 of Garrison Forest 4th would increase the danger of the intersection
combined with the dip in the road to the west just short of this area.
The petition from the neighborhood opposed granting of this request. Also
noted was the desire of the neighborhood to keep the openess of the area
without squeezing in additional homes.
DISCUSSION: Hissink noted that two of these lots were larger than any of the
other lots in the area. He felt this was the best solution for this area.
Wedlund said the design was orininally had and should be corrected with more
open space. He told Hissink that he had the option to anneal this before
the City Council.
1:2114
b21/4
May 6, 1980
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R80-85
• RESOLUTION SETTING HEARING FOR
APPEAL OF DECISION OF BOARD OF
APPEALS & ADJUSTMENTS, BUILDING
MOVING PERMIT #M80-8
• WHEREAS, the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, on April 17,
1980, approved a request for a building moving permit 01180-8 for Lot 1,
Block 1, proposed Garrison Forest 4th Add., and
WHEREAS, John -0, Dougherty has filed with the City a written request . .
asking the City Council to review said denial.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Eden Prairie City Council
that a public hearing on said matter shall be held at 7:30 P.M. on Tues.,
May 20,-1980. The City Clerk shall give published and mailed notice of
such meeting.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, ,CTerk
April 24, 1980
The Honorable Wolfgang Penzel
Mayor, City of Eden Prairie
Dear Mr. Mayor:
I wish to appeal the decision of the Board of Appeals
and Adjustments on April 17, 1980 granting building
moving request No. M80-8 submitted by Lyonell Ostrom,
said building moving request requesting permission to
move a building onto Lot 1, Block 3, Garrison Forest
4th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. I under-
stand that such appeal will be to the City Council
and that you will advise me of the date thereof.
Very truly_yours,
A-
Ohn D. Dough rt
/r3 . m 9.260
p' 4,1: 7 I 7 C e90,'4) a .4. .1 07
214 1,.../.a.;7 ro,,a 4 t,
s hc./e reie,4,t Re rtso,o7 .t.e.01 A w
13,...,7 c ; 60„, La, .li con 3: Lee r
t
120 f )1' D C • ti PIA ^flee
C I ) : , -1) A nJ.,
143°1" k.vrr:
tA10-1
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
8950 EDEN PRAIRIE RD
EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344
PHONE 937-2262
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE OR
BUILDING MOVING PERMIT PURSUANT
TO ORD 135, 77-6 AND 79-34
DATE March 7, 1980
APPLICANT'S NAME • INDIELL_OaTEDM
ADDRESS 4815 FLAG AVENUE NORTH
NEW HOPE. MINNESOTA
PHONE
APPLYING FOR: VARIANCE
X BUILDING MOVING PERMIT
ZIP 55428
(HOME) 5_15=19.0A
(WORK)
. ATTACH THE FOLLOWING WITH VARIANCE APPLICATION
1. 81/2 X 11 survey showing lot lines and setbacks of existing and proposed
structures and location of buildings on adjoining properties. Also
show pertinent topographical features such as trees, fences, berms,
steep slopes, ponding areas, roads, existing and proposed elevations.
•
2. Letter addressed to the Board of Appeals and Adjustments explaining
nature of variance request and reasons why conformance to the literal
provisions of the City's ordinances would cause undue hardship.
3. Legal description of property to which variance applies.
4. $25.00 fee payable to City of Eden Prairie.
ATTACH THE FOLLOWING WITH BUILDING MOVING PERMIT APPLICATION
1. X 11 survey showing lot lines and setbacks of existing and proposed
structures and location of buildings on adjoining properties. Also
show pertinent topographical features such as trees, fences, berms,.
steep slopes, ponding areas, roads, existing and proposed elevations.
2. Six color photographs of (a) two or more views of the building to be
moved, (b) the lot on which the buildirg is to be located, and (c)
the lands and structures thereon adjacent to the lot on which the
building is to be located.
3. Letter addressed to the Board of Appeals and Adjustments explaining
general construction details, size and year of chstruction of
Pik/ 1.4t.411-
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
FROM:
Board Of Appeals & Adjustments
April 17, 1980 ,
Moving of two buildings from Vo-tec Schools into Eden Prairie
Walter D. Johnson, Building Official
Pursuant to Section 3 of Ordinance 79-34, T personally made investigations
of the residences located at both Suburban Hennepin Vo-tec schools.
My observation indicated that the homes are structurally sound, and in
'good repair. I noted a few items that had to be corrected before the homes
were moved into Eden Prairie, the carpenter instructor indicated that they
would be corrected.
End Of Report.
1301
March 7, 1980
Board of Appeals and Adjustments
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Gentlemen:
I propose to move a 1300 square foot Rambler, built by
the South Campus of Hennepin Technical Center, to Lot 1
Block 3, Garrison Forest Fourth Addition, Hennepin County
Minnesota.
The structure meets all Statt, Building Codes, has been
inspected by a State inspector and meets the requirements
of the code. Construction was started on the structure
in 1979 and will be completed by May 1, 1980.
Features,: Overall dimensions 72'2" X 28'6"
1300 square feet.
Three Bedrooms.
Rough Sawn Cedar Siding and Brick Veneer.
1 3/4 bathrooms.
Vaulted beam ceiling in the living room.
Heatolator energy pak fireplace w/glass doors.
Dining Room.
22 x 24 attached garage.
R-30 ceiling insulation.
1" styrofoam sheathing - Wall R19.
Anderson casement windows w/insulated glass.
Patio Deck.
Walkout basement - rear.
Legal Description: Lot 1 Block 1, Garrison Forest Fourth Add-
ition, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
(Copy of Survey attached)
Principal buildings on lands abutting the land on which building
is to be moved is from 0 to 5 years. (Shopping center under
construction at the present time - dwellings 0 to 5 years old)
Prior to filing for this Building Moving Permit I have contacted
adjacent home owners.
Attached are colored photographs of the building to be moved,
the lot on which the building is to be located, and the lands
and structures theron adjacent to the lot on which the building
is to be located.
Your kind attention to processing this application is greatly
appreciated.
Very truly yours,
c,o;zr-
L y onell Ostrom
4885 Flag Ave. North c51128 .15o1
:;•• n••' ; tk. rç
NOTE :
24* LONG MON 1.44.12AAWNT A.P40
IDENTI1CA110t4 DISC fAClOAL SIZE)
sti. AT ALL PO,NTS 9404CATFD.
10411. KEG. LAND SAAIVEY0f1 #7093
r-1-11 r riT7
%Pt
ua
€
lln
YU° NC
lt
€
3 0...,019 1 • coo, 1. 11071 n14,6 mt. .•
0••••• 07 ',A ••••
Ann G- RU! I
8A515 FoS ZERRIE34 is SSOMGO
30 0 30
6-?-7 malrae -214612319
SCALE IN FEET
1310
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
FOR
&WELL 05TROM
LOT', DLOCh I, 6/412Ri5aV FOXEST eCkg2TH ADD/nag-I
HEIJOEPIO CO. MN. !se2-
c
Ptf :7'ff.'
p.
p Em oit:f-.
SIL
_
•n••
Ns.
0 IDEILIOTEs ;Pm, molourAEMTS
0E5cizh8E0 Se.cen./
s
.5••
-1%; -"?* 110•.17g)
1 *.•44.
r'.1 % •
s at
• ••.•
LEGE1JD
exisrn6 6rAcE --
PROPOSED GPROE C
SultrAc( GROWAt,a .... .6--
PROP. roe Or F4hlo47t04)8772
GACAGE ft-oaC 6-16,x 67b.q
piZoP. 43AsEmsur ,=,..aot EL.
INZAAN NAC/c: TOP Ador H v:24LiT 47 i.or
BLDG /, 6,44.V.SO.0 roznr Tprico aDotitoAt
riEY.7." ela.2y
tants swifts Me this Afros woo Prhoorw4
by rn., or toder MI direct 'worsts:ow, psi
Mgt 1 on • guy Alpisiorref toms Starrtrot
under Ms lows a M. sta. of
001. Ze_Fd b'f)?•it
!FIELD BOW PAGEi 6 ,/ I DRAWN 8Y , 61/114
4:(r/s ,.
• `47,2
-4L0,,w9 7
.8
j,
CPLiwa, Jo- 0--•-
b 1.
I.' .11`
4
sISON FOREST SECOND ADDITION - Proposed Squa t Compartion Chart • 864 LEGAL ADDRESS 61 Li 9420 Garrison 2 9400 " 82 Li 9380 " 2 9360 3 9340 SI 4 9320 11 9300. II 6 9290 7 9280 6 9270 83 11 9260 2 9250 3 9240 Outlot I 84 Li 9245 2 9225 3 9205 BS 11 9365 2 9345 3 9325 4 9305 5 9285 6 9265 85 Li 9425 2 9405 3 9691 4 9681 9671 6 9661 7 9652 8 9662 9672 10 9682 11 9692 12 9702 13 9712 Swanson G-9-8 1290 Pfau 666-6 1297 Namvar G-7-B 1078 Hester 666-A 1337 Anderson 666-C 1337 Gothro 666-0 1297 Ottum G-9-B 1290 Eisenberg 666-A 1297 Pooten G-9-6 1973 Dougherty 6-9-A 1342 cryi-eorr, i-rrc-C7 I33. .Jo1-1 1450K .D7 I Bci 0 Hanson . 666-C 1297 Humphreys Erhart Hirabayski Beebe Bendurant Meligy Yahn Schuberg Br lent Asby Toepal Hildebrandt Chang • Nguyen Walters Lotzer 6-9-A 1342 (LIYING) . - 1290 1297 1078 1337 . 1337 1297 1290 1297 1973 1290 1245 1008 845 852 1245 1290 1245 1488 TOTAL BASMT 'GAR :TOTAL HOUSE 447 584 420 630 633 447 535 • 447 667 3027 3126 2566 2815 2512 2929 3115 2929 4128 1342 1342 447 3131 )33 184,0 fas 37Q0 13c10 12eq0 SDI?, 33043 1297 1245 488 3030 1290 1290 447 3027 1297 1245 440 2982 1290 1290 447 3027 1297 852 447 2596 1162 1008 480 2650 1084 960 440 2484 924 864 480 2268 1297 1245 447 2989 1297 1245 447 2989 944 944 504 2392 1993 832 495 3320 1075 952 447 2474 1330 1248 498 3076 1078 1008 480 2566 1290 1290 491 3071 1342 1342 491 3175 HOMEOWNER MODEL # 1st FLR .2nd FIR Way II II II II II II II II G-9-A 1290 666-A 1297 G-9-6 1290 665-2 1297 G-7-A 1162 G-6-A 1084 659-A 924 666-0 1297 666-C 1297 668-C 944 804-A 1129 0-6-A 1075 36-B 1330 G-7-A 1078 G-9-8 1290 John L. Hissink, A.S.L.A. Chairman, Design Review Comm. April 17, 1980
/ , • •
tcia .,4,c)&4:41c( „Litz -to
4c-i'd _La tr .
74,1.41-Lrx, t
16 L, c.u4
(7'04 vILL /ntit-C.0
Cf
71 / ,
Y
10 71f,) (P.44C-74-LizZlIXkLi
r
PETITION
THE UNDERSIGNED, neighboring property owners and
residents, strongly oppose the placement of the buildings
constructed by the South Campus of the Hennepin Technical
Center on Lots 1 and 3, Block 1, Garrison Forest Fourth
Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. These straight un-
appealing moveable structures are in substantial variance
and disharmony with the established pattern of building
development in our neighborhood. As such they do not qualify
for placement in the aforesaid lots under either Hennepin
County Ordinance 79-34 or the Restrictive Covenants applicable
to the lots. We have suffered enough with the Super Valu
development permitted at our back doors. Please do not allow
our neighborhood to be further sullied with these cheap mobile
homes.
We further oppose the Variance requested for Lots 2
and 3 in said Block to the SO foot set back requirement from
Anderson Lakes Parkway. This area is already ugly enough with
the commercial development across the street.
Resident Number Street
tfiyAiaq/A.1622.-A, 9_55_0_Aa ea4e2s.ifi
9.f -30 GI,P/S0A> GU,P__e
° ) 4 704 f da.oza.., 9c675 Amor., Play
(R6xNA.1114iONA6C4, __a_St 0 6-0M, tS;v1/4. Vii cui
_Tacabf Au_catLASZIkg
,12„„,.;)„_ INA: R tmg3. c5E? C4raztso,) (A/
PETITION
THE UNDERSIGNED, neighboring property owners and
residents, strongly oppose the placement of the buildings
constructed by the South Campus of the Hennepin Technical
Center on Lots 1 and 3, Block 1, Garrison Forest Fourth
Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. These straight un-
appealing moveable structures are in substantial variance
and disharmony with the established pattern of building
development in our neighborhood. As such they do not qualify
for placement in the aforesaid lots under either Hennepin
County Ordinance 79-34 or the Restrictive Covenants applicable
to the lots. We have suffered enough with the Super Valu
development permitted at our back doors. Please do not allow
our neighborhood to be further sullied with these cheap mobile
homes.
We further oppose the Variance requested for Lots 2
and 3 in said Block to the 50 foot set back requirement from
Anderson Lakes Parkway. This area is already ugly enough with
the commercial development across the street.
Resident
. , t o 'I ;
/
c-e)
alccsAi
1
,
Number Street
6t5 0 - Oat-11w,, r (t-
Ldf,-(1
U.) os-ti
6/1,6c/5eA) iiqf-
PETITION
THE UNDERSIGNED, neighboring property owners and
residents, strongly oppose the placement of the buildings
constructed by the South Campus of the Hennepin Technical
Center on Lots 1 and 3, Block 1, Garrison Forest Fourth 1 .
Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. These straight un"---,
appealing movcable structures are in substantial variance
and disharmony with the established pattern of building I /
development in our neighborhood. As such they do not qualify
for placement in the aforesaid lots under either HeiLlpjd
County Ordinance 71/e34 or the Restrictive Covenants applicable
to the lots. We have suffered enough with the Super Valu
development permitted at our back doors. Please do not allow
our neighborhood to be further sullied with these cheap mobile
homes.
We further oppose the Variance requested for Lots 2
and 3 in said Block to th:?. 50 foot set back requirement from
Anderson Lakes Farkvay. This area is already ugly enough with
the commercial development across the street.
Number Street
/
275 <if Jr.-, Wt.,/
(laGS" (cat -
9'e85 C„,-,e ,s' OA,
9 31,0 ft )5Z' 11 1:41 (/
i.?« (1, tC)
' Azt viti;11. .
n I
'el-- 4
161 7 .1315
-4-
5. of Appls & Adj - unapproved Thursday, April 17, 1:D
Building roving_Reouest 1"MS0-7 submitted by Emmett C. Johnson located at
lot 3, Glock 1 Garrsion Forest 4th Addition.
Hedlund noted that this house moving permit would be negated due to the deni
a
l
of variance request 080-9. He suggested Johnson withdraw the request and if
the City Council should overrule he may reapply.
Johnson stated he would withdraw but added that only depth is the problem s
i
n
c
e
he felt his home was compatible with the other homes and would be spacious
a
r
o
u
n
d
i
t
.
5. Eeildinc roving Reouest_0,r80-8 .submitted by_lyonell Ostrom located at Lot 1,
Block 1 Garrison Forest 4th Addition.
Hedlund questioned if any other variances are needed for this application.
Dougherty stated he felt the house was in violation of Ord. 79-34, Section
5
,
Item G, "if the location to which the building is to be moved is in the Ci
t
y
,
the building is in substantial variance with either the established or the
expected pattern of building development within the neighborhood to which
the building is to be moved. Comparative age, bulk, architectural style a
n
d
quality of construction of both the building to be moved and the building
s
existing in the neighborhood shall be considered in determining whether a
building is in substantial variance." Dougherty pointed out that the home
to be moved is a straight home without any design that would it make it
compatible with a Ban-Con Home.
Marjorie Ostrum, wife of Lyonell Ostrom told the Board of her credentials as
a building official for Maplewood and a licensed real estate broker. She
f
e
l
t
the homes are quality built by the students and must meet all of the State
Building Codes. She felt the home was esthetically pleasing with gables,
overhangs and partial brick. They planned to live in the home; not turn it
over for profit.
Pooton said he had visited the Vo Tech schools and admitted he had a hard t
i
m
e
visulizing the home with gables etc. and moved on to property. He felt it
h
a
d
a double wide mobile home concept and would not match their neighborhood.
Dickey asked if they would be willing to gamble that a better house would
b
e
built. He noted the house had 1332 sq. ft. which was more than most of th
e
other homes.
Ostrum said the house had seven corners on the front which did not make th
e
house straight.
Dickey felt the home was built with quality but could empathize with the p
e
o
p
l
e
concerned in the neighborhood.
Ralph Hanson, 9245 Garrison Way, said he was familiar with the quality of
t
h
e
interior portion which could not be viewed as a passerby. He felt the ho
u
s
e
was flat.
Hedlund questioned Hissink regarding the approval of the Preserve.
Hissink replied that the Design and Architecture Review Committee had no
q
u
a
l
m
s
about this home. He added that Ban-Con did not have a house that would fit
on the lot and had moved on to Hillsborough.
61(01
Ed. of Appls & Adj- unapproved -5- April 17, 19t
Wedlund expleined that tan-Con has moved out of this area and the pe:91e
could not control any other builder building on these lots.
Susan Dougherty stated that they paid dues to an association of the Preserve
for protection of their rights and felt they were not being represented.
Sandvick noted the petition called the homes "cheap mobile homes" and felt
some people could have been mislead by the wording. Technically any home
could be moved.
John Longly, stated that he and his wife had gone to see
the proposed homes before reading the petition and his wife's first statement
was, "They look just like a mobile home".
Mrs. Ostrum reiterated the fact that the homes were not built as a mobile
home with the code for them but as a home with the uniform building code.
Their intention is to make the home fit in with the area and the neighborhood.
They just wished to move to the community of Eden Prairie.
Johnson noted that most people could not tell existing Vo Tech homes after
they were placed on a lot.
Pooton questioned the reason for the signs of the house moving requests. He
felt negative feelings were a result of these signs.
Wedlund explained that the Ordinance for house moving requests had this
requirement for the protection of the neighborhood.
Hissink pointed out that the Ordinance was passed only about six months ago.
Wedlund asked if Ostrum had a time limit for moving the house from the
Vo Tech school.
Ostrum said the deadline was May 10th.
Sandvick said he felt the home met all the requirements of the Ordinance
and felt their was a problem with the accurateness of the wording of the
petition and the possibility that not all the people saw the home.
Pooton asked Hissink if there was an alternate plan.
Hissink stated he was not in a position to say.
Mr. Mike Krumpotich, 9550 Garrison Way, stated that this would not directly
affect him but just didn't like the idea of a cramped area. He pointed out
the fact a shopping center was already approved and wanted the remaining
area preserved. He also didn't like the idea of a rambler.
Sandvick explained that all someone needed to build a house was a buildinn
nermit. The person could build any style home he wished.
.ickey noted that since the lots backed Anderson Lakes Parkway that not
everyone would be interested in purchasing the lot.
Susan Dougherty felt they did not have time to fight the Preserve.
01')
Bd. of Appls & Adj unapproved -6- April 17, 1PDO
Sandvick explained that if the Board passed this request the
y
h
a
d
t
h
e
option of going before the City Council.
Hissink asked if the Preserve could get a copy of the petitio
n
.
Dougherty remarked that a petition is an emotional response
t
o
a
n
i
s
s
u
e
a
n
d
reflect their feelings in regard to the houses not conforming
.
In regard
to the adjectives "cheap mobile home" this could be slanted
b
u
t
i
s
n
o
r
e
a
s
o
n
to disregard the petition. He felt the Board was substituting
t
h
e
i
r
judgment for theirs.
Wedlund felt certain stipulations should be added if the requ
e
s
t
w
a
s
c
w
,
:
r
o
v
f
,d.
The exterior of the home, shubbery, and other codes should conf
e
-
r
.
.0strum said he had already contracted a company for landscap
i
n
g
.
Hissink said the Preserve had approved the floor plans but not
t
h
e
f
i
n
a
l
p
l
a
n
regarding the color and texture of the exterior. This must me
e
t
t
h
e
c
o
v
e
n
a
n
t
s
and the completion time for the yard is one year after the gro
w
i
n
g
s
e
a
s
o
n
.
Wedlund questioned Ostrum about the driveway.
Ostrum said he had planned to put in concrete unless the Pres
e
r
v
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
blacktop.
MOTION: Dickey moved to approve, seconded by Sandvick, to ap
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
building moving request submitted by Ostrum for Lot 1, Block
1
G
a
r
r
i
s
o
n
4
t
h
Yith the conditions that the landscapino be in accordance wit
h
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
installed by the time accorded by the Preserve. The color a
n
d
t
e
x
t
u
r
e
(brick) of the exterior should be approved by the Preserve H
o
m
e
o
w
n
e
r
s
s
s
o
.
A driveway should be installed. The hone woula meet the requ
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
Building Department for the foundation, basement, and other c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
.
Sandvick added that contrary to the petition the home does c
o
n
f
o
r
m
t
o
O
r
d
.
7
9
-
3
4
.
Motion carried unanimously.
6. Other Business
Jullie pointed out a problem with the next meeting falling
o
n
t
h
e
d
a
t
e
o
f
t
h
e
Award's Banquet.
MOTION: Wedlund moved, seconded by Sandvick, to move the May
1
5
t
h
r
e
g
u
l
a
r
meeting to May 22nd. Motion carried unanimously.
7. Adjournment.
Sandvick moved, seconded by Dickey, to adjourn at 10:15. Moti
o
n
c
a
r
r
i
e
d
.
I 311 tvol-
May 20, 1980
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CI OF EDEN PRAIRIE
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows:
NATIONAL REGISTRY OF EMERGENCY
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO.
KIWI KAI IMPORTS, INC.
TWIN CITY WINE CO.
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC.
ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO.
MIDWEST WINE CO.
OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC.
BUTCH'S BAR SUPPLY
STATE TREASURER, STATE OF MINNESOTA
STATE TREASURER, STATE OF MINNESOTA
JOYCE TWISTOL, TREASURER
SANDY WERTS
VOID OUT CHECK
HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE
VOID OUT CHECK
VOID OUT CHECK
SPEAKER'S BUREAU
MINNESOTA ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS
MARILYN CVFTNIC
JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
TWIN CITY WINE CO.
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC.
ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO.
MINNESOTA DISTILLERS, INC.
BUTCH'S BAR SUPPLY
OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC.
CREEK KNOLLS PARTNERSHIP
DON ATKINS
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
MURRAY CORPORATION
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE & ANNUITY CO.
UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS
IN1IRNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENG
PERA
GUNILLA MONTGOMERY, TRAINING COORDIN
BEER WHOLESALERS INC.
COCA-COLA BOTTLING MIDWEST
DAVIDSEN DISTRIBUTING CO.
DAY DISTRIBUTING CO
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY
GOLD MEDAL BEVERAGE COMPANY
LEDING DISTRIBUTING CO., INC
PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO.
ROUILLARD BEVERAGE CO., INC.
THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO.
MIR MASOOD ALI
ARMOR LOCK & SAFE CO.
ARTLKA INCORPORATED
EMT Examination fee-Police dept
Title registration
Liquor
Wine
Liquor
Liquor
Liquor
Wine
Wine
Supplies-Liquor store
Class "C" water operators certificate
Class "D" water operators certificate
Dues
Petty cash-Bryant Lake
Title registration
Expenses-Senior Citizens Center 25.00
Zoo trip-Senior Citizens Center 78.80
Change fund-Lake Riley 25.00
Liquor 1,541.50
Wine 344.31
Liquor 2,584.81
Liquor 1,334.86
Liquor 1,226.83 '
Supplies-Liquor store 115.45 I
Liquor 705.27
Payment of property on Franlo Rd-Park dept 2,975.00
Bales for soil erosion control-Eng dept 622.25
Payroll 11,810.68
Conference-Street dept 12.00
Payroll 205.00
Payroll 29.50 :
Dues 220.00
Payroll 8,728.35 '
Conference-Water dept 10.00
Beer 3,797.13
Mixes 270.90 '
Beer 31.80 ,
Beer 1,873.60,
Beer 3,940.59 :
Mixes 175.15
Beer .2,683.47.
Mixes 264.30 '
Beer 1,570.65
Beer 4,466.05
Mileage 3.76
Deadbolt lock-Historical Culture 66.90
Burlap-Park dept 33.00 '
1522
1523
1524
1525
1526
1527
1528
1529
1530
1531
1532
1533
1534
1535
1536
1537
1538
1539
1540
1541
1543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1559
1559
1560
1561
1562
1563
1564
1565
15,:c
1568
1569
1570
1571
$ 45.00
3.25
258.84
70.20
418.02
907.62
1,261.04
1,887.34
1,838.78
15.50
15.00
15.00
10.00
25.00
7.50
Paso two
May 20, 1930
15i, HOPKINS POSTMASTER
1573 ASTLEEORD EQUIPMENT CO., INC.
1574 NANCY AUTIO
7575 KATHY BALFANZ
1576 BMW
1577 RAE BLY
1573 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING
1579 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC.
1580 BUSINESS FURNITURE INCORPORATED
1581 CHANHASSEN AUTO PARTS
1582 CITY OF EDINA
1533 JAMES G. CLARK
1584 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC.
1585 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC, INC.
1586 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY
15 WARD F. DAHLBERG
155o DALCO
1589 DECATUR ELECTRONICS, INC.
1590 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY
1591 DORHOLT PRINTING & STATIONERY, INC.
1592 EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS
1593 EDEN PRAIRIE SANITATION CO.
1594 FILKINS EXCAVATING, INC.
1595 FIRE SAFETY & COMMUNICATIONS CORP
1596 FLYING CLOUD OIL COMPANY
1597 JOHN FRANE
1598 FRONTIER LUMBER & HARDWARE
1599 NORM GANZ FENCING CO., INC.
1600 GENERAL BINDING CORP.
1601 GENERAL COMMUNICAliONS, INC.
1602 DALE GREEN CO.
1603 GROSS INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
1604 JACK HACKING
1605 tARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC.
1605 iENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION
1607 1ENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION
1603 IENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE
1009 TNNEPIN TECHNICAL CENTERS
1610 IONEYWELI. INC
MO NS DODGE SALES, INC.
•612 10PKINS PARTS CO.
1613 MPERIAL INC.
1614 NSTITU1E ON AGING
Postage 154.20
Parts-Street dept 30.80
Refund-Rec dept 12.00
Refund-Rec dept 12.00
Service-Dell Road, Ringroute 78th Street- 4,836.97
Hwy 169, Temp Signal on TH 169, TN #5 &
West 78th Street & Mitchell Rd, Anderson
Lake Parkway Homeward Hills Road
Mileage 29.87
Service-Whittington Walk-168th St. W. 7,756.02
Harberough Court, Homeward Hills Park
Develop, Proposed Valley View, Duck Lake
& Dell Road
Rock 1,405.18
Table-Water dept 107.80
Socket, exhaust system, brake fluid, mirror, 614.49
battery, oil filters
Tests 80.00
Fuel for squad car 13.24
Level rod, tape, chain, reel, paint, lead, 364.32
erasers-Park dept, safety vest, hammer, 1st
aid kit-Engineering dept
Lab glassware-Water dept 7.50
Quicklime-Water dept 1,884.72
Mileage 8.36
Cleaning supplies-Water dept 313.40
Repair radar-Police dept 16.74
Plastic -Water dept 24.95
Office supplies 412.52
Ads-Liquor store 52.80
Service 60.50
Service-Park dept 872.50
Traffic cones-Water dept 22.62
Fuel-Historical Society 174.42
Expenses 118.00
Plywood, bench at Round Lake field, tennis 274.35
court bench
Backstops-Park dept
Forms-Engineering dept
Equipment repair & parts-Police dept
Black dirt-Park dept
Service
Expenses
Books-Planning dept
Board of Prisoners
Property taxes
Deposit on group camp site
Conference-Fire dept
Service Air driers-Water dept
Switch
Muffler, sandpaper, plugs, piston, filter, 695.00
belts, points, wire
Bolts & nuts-Fire dept
Registration fee-Senior Citizens Center
2,175.00
60.80
58.10
6.50
65.93
29.35
29.95
388.00
643.35
5.00
150.00
639.99
69.46
130.95
48.50
Page three
Ma 0, 1980
1615 INSTY-PRINTS
1616 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES
1617 JEAN JOHNSON
1618 RONALD O. JOHNSON
1619 JOHNSON PAPER & SUPPLY CO.
1620 JUDSON EMILY CENTER, INC.
1621 KAMLEITER SEWER & WATER
1622 KARULF HARDWARE, INC.
1623 KNOX LUMBER
1624 KRAEMER'S HOME CENTER
1625 IEEE BROS. INC.
1626 ROBERT PAUL LISTIAK
1627 LOWELL LUND
1628 MATT'S AUTO SERVICE, INC.
16( MAYVIEW RADIO
1630 JACK MCCLARD & ASSOC., INC.
1631 MARCIA MCINTOSH-JAYCEE WOMEN
1632 BEN MEADOWS COMPANY
1633 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIPMENT CO.
1634 MERIT PRINTING
1635 METHODIST HOSPITAL
1636 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION
1637 MINNEAPOLIS STAR & TRIBUNE CO.
1638 MINNESOTA DAILY
1639 MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY
1640 MODERN TIRE CO.
1641 MUNICIPAL & PRIVATE SERVICES, INC.
1642 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
1643 NSP
1644 N W BELL TELEPHONE
1645 LORI OLSON
1645 W.G. PEARSON, INC.
1647 PETTY CASH
1648 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING, INC.
1649 RAPID COPY, INCORPORATED
1650 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOCIATES, INC.
1651 ROOT-O-MATIC SEWER SERVICE
Survey cut sheets-Engineering dept 24.42 '
Typewriter ribbon 6.39
Expenses 11.74 Conference-Fire dept 33.36
Towels-City Hall 52.32
Consulting-Police dept 100.00
Repair Sewer Service
Hinges, hand maul, casters-Engineering dept a 0.056
switch, drills, screws-Police dept, flashlight
bulbs, batteries-Fire dept, sandmix, tape, steel
wool, paint-Street dept, electric plates, paint,
plane, trash bags, locks-Park dept, hammer, signs
grass seed, screwdrivers-Community service, enamel
paint-Tennis courts, ladder, saw-Water dept
Snow fence-Park dept 429.60
Brooms, pipe, carpet cleaner-Fire dept, 623.25
light bulbs, paint, grass seed, ladder, brushes,
hammer, power rooter drain cleaner, flashlights,
-Water dept, rakes, leaf bags-Park dept
Service 147.75
Conference-Fire dept 25.00
Conference-Fire dept 33.36
Towing service 45.00
Radar repairs & parts-Police dept 36.10
Scan adapter-Street dept 15.00
Service 25.00
Pole pruner-Park dept 110.47
Oxygen 23.10
Plumbing permit forms-Bldg dept 210.71
1st Aid supplies 1,733.68
Blacktop 155.27
Employment ads-Rec dept 46.40
Ads 22.80
Service 117.17
Equipment repair & parts 1,048.80
Service 549.88
Service 4,329.03
Service 6.10
Service 926.79
Refund-Rec dept 9.60
Rock 173.92
Expenses 10.67
Forms-Police dept 77.25
Liquor ID cards 9.00
Service-Industrial Rd Utilites, Round 49,759.19
Lake Utilities, Eden Rd Sanitary Sewer,
High Trails Sewer & Water, Pedestrian Bridges,
Round Lake Park Redesign, Valley View Road,
Crosstown Industrial Park, Eden Prairie Super
Valu Sewer Service, Shady Oak Ind. Pk., Round
Lake Estates, Cardinal Creek Estates, Norseman
Ind. Park 4th Addition,
46.50 Sewer service-Mitchell Road
5
1676
1677
1678
1679
1680
1681
1632
1683
1684
1685
1686
1687
1688
1639
1690
1691
1692
1693
1694
1695
1696
1697
1698
1 '99 (
JO
1701
1702
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1660
1661
1662
1663
1664
1665
1666
1667
1668
1669
1670
1671
1672
1673
174
Permanent Street & Utility easement
Grinding wheels, booster shocks-Police
Tree removal
Fuel
Supplies-Police dept
Steel posts-Park dept
Equipment repair & parts
Sewer connection-Bryant Lake Stable
Portable crane-Water dept
Tree removal
Expenses
Dues
Uniforms-Police dept
Chlorine Liquid-Water dept
Expenses-Police dept
Warning lights
Subscription-Water dept
Rock
Fire hydrant parts
Helmets, shields-Public safety
Tree removal
Service
Fee
Fee
Insurance
Insurance
Insurance
Insurance
Insurance
Insurance
Tree removal
Mileage
April custodial service
Legal service
Sewer service
Service
Legal service
Cardinal Creek
Country Vista
Round Lake area utilities
Cabinets & counter-Park dept
Property taxes
Rock-Park dept
Instructor
Instructor
Instructor
Instructor
Instructor
Instructor
Instructor
128.53 ,
dept 93.94•
5,198.0
65.39i
3.001
330.00
57.34
400.01
217.0
1,760.0J
53.00
754.90
258.8(i
12.0!
42.00
24.01:
80.60
379.31
177.81
614.00
1,031.36'
100.0C
15.00
113.70
1,093.64
363.1
122.3
6,122.90
880.0:
11.4
183.14
21,592.7'
6,023.9E
178.01
79,081.6
19,304.4:
956.01
684.5:
5,013.3A
144.04
128.0E
12.01
12.0
40.04
16.0E
80.04
Page four e 20, 1980
WERNER W. & MARTA SCHULZE
SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.
SHADYWOOD TREE EXPERTS, INC.
W. GORDON SMITH CO.
JOHN SORENSEN
ST. REGIS PAPER COMPANY
SUBURBAN AUTO ELECTRIC
SWEDLUND SEWER & WATER
TURNKEY MATERIAL HANDLING, INC.
TRI-STATE 1REE SERVICE, INC.
BOB TYSON
ROGER K. ULSTAD
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
VAN WATERS & RUGERS
KEITH WALL
WARNING LITES, INC.
WARREN, GORHAM & LAMONT
RIVER WARREN AGGREGATES INC.
WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY
WEBER & TROSETH INC.
WOODLAND TREE SERVICE
XEROX CORPORATION
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
STATE TREASURER, STATE OF MINNESOTA
HMO SERVICES
BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD
GROUP HEALTH PLAN, INC.
WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE
HMO SERVICES
PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN
ASHLEY'S TREE SERVICE
STEPHEN CALHOON
EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT #272
LANG, PAULY & GREGERSON, LTD.
METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION
NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
PERBIX, HARVEY, SIMONS & THORFINNSON
BROWN & CRIS, INC.
RICHARD KNUTSON, INC.
NORTHERN CONTRACTING, INC.
BRUCE BREN HOMES
VOID OUT CHECK
HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION
W.G. PEARSON, INC.
BECKI ADAMI
KARIN GORI
FRITZ HARRING
JACQULINE HEGMAN
MEG STEVENSON
SCOTT WALLOA
LYNN WIEDEWITSCH
TOTAL $310,953.9
[
'271J7 --1-rI lf---1
, 1_,.....- . L.,.........
Mtlj.i .D) '0
APR /5 1
April 10, 19E0
Mayor Penzel and City Crunch.). Members
City of Eden Piairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Re: Bluffs West 3rd Addition
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I am requesting your consideration of a revision of our Bluffs West 3rd Addi-
tion plat of 169 single family lots. The City Council approved the first
reading of the 3rd Addition October 2, 1979, based upon the plan dated Septem-
bar 26, 1979. The approved plan provided 169 lots on approximately 85 acres
(attached exhibit B).
Our proposed phasing plan provided about 30 lots to begin spring 1980. Because
of changes in market demand, financial constraints and housing costs, there is
a greatly reduced need for additional single family lots at this time. Orrin
Thompson Homes, Inc. will begin some homes in the 80 lot first phaso of Bluffs
West 2nd Addition during 1980. Future timing for 3rd Addition lots is unclear.
The slowdown in the current single family home market is most likely tempor-
ary, with demand for hoses returning after the current downturn. However, a
greater share of the housing market will be priced out of single family homes
as a result. Major builders such as Orrin Thompson Homes are developing alter-
native housing styles to fill the void created by the high coat of even the most
basic single family home.
We have approved planned unit developments in 3 communities in which we are re-
questing reconsideration by the city to allow the introduction of a new housing
type. If the Eden Prairie City Council would consider a change to allow a
townhouse density on a portion of our Bluffs West 3rd site, we will proceed to
develop plans for submission to the Planning Commission. However, if the City
Council does not believe ouch a proposea revision appropriate, The Bluffs Com-
pany will proceed with the existing Developer's Agreement dated 11/4/79.
I appreciate your consideration of our request.
Re.s.;,uc ully,
AJIloce, Hustdd
12750 PIONEER TRAIL, EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55343 (612)941-4383
1\ ' \ / **1 • .- - -4___ - \ NJS — '044 '-•: \\ '1---... ... • ...," -- 1 T') -(4 .Z-. 7 e31-71.7:Ii I.] N . ';:•••.1-..--_ ./.' •.. i'‘ -.\ 1:-. - ..L..._. .L:.. :' st I, .;t.:7•- K...-.5. ' ‘\ '1__I ir----------•-•-"-V. 1 ' '''• 1J • ..----!.1'1,',','' ' ' ; ,....-1-..--2,--_--: • , •N - <-7-<,..,?(k._,... . ' ' '1,,I, ,) ..' ' •;-i?-' ---711.-..creH 1-d 0:c‘l-c."•';''.., ',-/i( C 1.0111.--.7.,...../f_4/„.„: ..- tnj'' •,•-•;:::-._--,^'-';';..i 14,, ' . I , ' fl.j.----_...-=.-::::.-----:.:V-'7... " -; ,, ;!.I• X.: -z.:_---.":".':".,,); j \\--...-( CC-77;:-....:->. ',..11.71;." _.. •6
May 15, 1980
TO: Roger Ulstad
FROM: Keith Wall
Attached is a letter from John DuBois regarding the radio system
bid opening on Wednesday, May 14, 1980.
Also, John asked that I pass along to you a brief recap of his
background, should anyone inquire as we continue on through our
communications system purchase process.
John is a registered, professional, communications engineer in
the states of Wisconsin, Illinois, and Minnesota. He received
his B.S., M.S., and PhD. in electrical engineering from the
University of Wisconsin and has 23 years experience in communi-
cations system design. Presently, he is employed by Hennepin
County as their communication manager and in that capacity is
responsible for the purchase of two million dollars worth of
radio equipment each year.
I should mention that we have been delighted with Dr. DuBois'
obvious concern for the interests of our city throughout this
bid process. We are confident that the system he has designed
for us is, state of the art and void of any unnecessary bells
and whistles, as he would put it.
Per your request, the following is a list of the mobile radio
needs of each city department:
Inspection Department - 4
Assessing Department - 3
Parks Department - 8
Engineering Department - 3
Water Department
Public Works
Fire Division
Police Division
TOTAL
This inventory was taken
vehicles have been added
- 4
- 18
- 5
-,(11 4 g'
!S
several months ago and I'm certain that
in various departments since that time.
COMMUNICATIONS
A-2309 Government Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487
May 14, 1980
Captain Keith Wall
Eden Prairie Public Safety Department
8950 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Captain Wall:
The purpose of this letter is to report on the results of the two-way radio
system bid opening of May 14, 1980 and to recommend contract award to the low,
compliant bidder.
Three complete bids were received, as follows:
Bidder Bid Bond Exceptions Delivery Amount
RCA Yes Yes 180 days $ 143,991.70
Motorola, Inc. Yes No 180 days $ 131,549.00
General Electric Co. Yes No 180 days $ 124,579.00
The bids from Motorola and the General Electric Company were fully compliant
with all procurement specifications that I developed in concert with you and
Mr. Jack Hacking, Director of Public Safety. The bid from RCA did not include
an interference protection guarantee as required by the technical specifications;
had RCA been the low bidder, their "disclaimer" may have prevented a bid award
to them. Based on all of the above facts, I recommend that the City of Eden
Prairie award Contract 01901 to the General Electric Company as low compliant
bidder.
For your information, the total system discount included in the General Electric
Company bid is 42 percent off list price; the mobile radios are discounted in
excess of 47 percent. Because the bid specifications were "open" and completely
non-restrictive for the three major radio equipment manufacturers, and because
we were able to achieve aggressive competitive bidding in the procurement
process, the City of Eden Prairie will spend approximately $100,000 less than
list price for a state-of-the-art radio communications system. You are going to
obtain a first line radio system at half price.
HENNEPIN COUNTY
on equal opportunity employer
6 z)
Captain Keith Wall
Page 2
It is interesting to note how closely I estimated the actual bid price for
the radio system. In my letter to Mr. Hacking dated January 25, 1979,
(copy enclosed) I estimated that the proposed 50 mobile radios would cost
$1,100 each. The bid price from the General Electric Company was $1,070
each for 70 mobile radios. The increase of 20 mobile radios plus other
additions to the original system design accounts for the increase in total
bid price from an estimated $96,800 for a 50 mobile unit system to $124,579
for a 70 mobile unit system bid.
I will be glad to assist in preparing a comprehensive contract with the
General Electric Company for review by your City Attorney. Hennepin County
and I are pleased to be of assistance to Eden Prairie in this important
project. I plan to attend the City Council meeting on May 20, 1980 to
discuss this letter and the entire project.
John R. DuBois Ph.D.
Communications Manager
Registered Professional Communications Engineer
JRD/bte
Encl.
cc: Ms. Jean Burhardt, Deputy County Administrator
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
TWO WAY RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
BID TABULATION
COMPANY BID
Cer:eral Electric
Motorola $131,549.00 _
R. C. A. $143, 991.70
TOTAL BID
$124,579.00
Less:
Tower Removal
Trade-In Equipment
Removal of Mobile Units
$230.00
250.00
770.00
- 1,250.00
$123,329.00 NET BID
6T1
VC96UAU96EV $ 5,179.00
356.00 0.04090
42-85-01 599.00
89-86-78017 506.00
RC-0 77.00
CW10-518 219.00
PROPOSAL
(To he opened May 14, 1980 at 4;00 PM in the Public Safety
Director's Office, 7805 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, MN)
CONTRACT NO. 1901
PROPOSAL OF GENCRAl ELECTRIC COMPANY
ApopEss 4620 W. 77th St., Minneapolis, MN 55435
RHONE 612/831-22/0
For the furnishing and installing of two-way radio equipment for the Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
.
Minnesota. The Engineer responsible for equipment specifications and ch
e
c
k
-
o
u
t
i
s
D
r
.
John R. DuBois. P.E.. at (612) 348-4081.
ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION MODEL UNIT PRICE TOTAL
la Lot 80 foot radio tower installed
per specifications SSVN80 $ 891.00 $ 891.00
lb One Base antenna P0-1109 $ 550.00 $
lc Lot Trans. line/connectors 7/8" OF $ /ft
Id One Install lb and lc $
le One Dismantle existing tower $
1 Total Items (la through le) $
550.00
424.00
1,616.00
230.00 n'
3,711.00
5,179.00
2a One
2b One
2c One
2d One
2e Lot
2f One
29 Lot
2h One
2 Total
800 MHz Repeater
Duplexer
Multicoupler
Preselector
Double Shielded Cable
Automatic Identifier
Filters, as needed
Install 2a through 29
Items (2a through 211)
356.00
599.00
506.00
$ 77.00
$ 219.00
438.00
$ _ 7,374.00
3a One 800 MHz Repeater
3b One Duplexer
3c One Multicoupler
3d One Preselector
3e One Automatic Identifier
3f Lot Double Shielded Cable
39 One Base Antenna
3h One Install 3a through 3F
31 Lot Trans line/connectors
VC75UAU96EV $ 5,179.00 $ 5.179.00
0114090 $ 356.00
356.00
42-85-01 $ 599.00
599.00
8-86-78017 $ 506.00 $ 506.00
CWID-5111
$
219.00
219.00
RG-9
77.00
77.00
P0-1109 S 550.00
438.00
7/8' LOF /ft $
550.00
424.00
/3;1 9
PROPOSAL
Page 2
ITEM glnuTiiv DESCRIPTION
MODEL UNIT PRICE TOTAL
35
3k
3
One
Lot
Total
Install Items 3g and 31
Filters, as needed
Items (3a through 3k)
346.00
$ 8,694.00
4a One Satellite Voting System as spec. VSDC $ 2,937.00 $ 2,937.00
$ 621.00 46 One $ 621.00 Spare voting Receiver w/case 1135AU96E
4c One Install 4a $ 103.00
44 One Base Antenna P0-1110 $ 580.00 $ 580.00
4e One Mounting Pipe $ in 41 $in 4g
41 Lot Trans. line/connectors 7/8" LOT $ /ft $ 393.00
44 One Install 44, 4e and 4f
42-85-01
599.00
$ 346.00
4h One Multicoupler $ $ 599.09
89-86-78017 $ 506.00 506.00 41 One Preselector $
4j One Cabinet $ $in 4a
4k Lot Double Shielded Cable $ $in 2e
41 Lot Install Items 46 through 4k $ 69.00
4 Total Items (4a through 41 $ 6,154.00
5a
One Control Consolette
539A1S2 $ 383.00
$
383.00
5b
One Install Item Sa
$
51.00
Sc One
Telephone Control Unit
513A1B1 $ 187.00
187.00
id
One
Install Sc and line
$
34.00
5
Total
Items (5a through 54)
$ 655.00
6a One Control Consolette
6b One Install item 6a
6t Two Telephone Type control units
64 Lot Install Item 6 and lines
6 Total Items (6a through 64)
539A1S1 $ 33300
333.00
51.00
374.00
51.00
809.00
51361131 $ 187.00
7a One
76 One
7c One
7d One
7 Total
Control Consolette
Install item 7a
Telephone Type control unit
Install Item 7c and line
Items (7a through 74)
539A1S1 $ 333.00 $ 333.00
$
34.00
513A181 $ 187.00 187.00
51.00
605.00
330
PROPOSAL
Page 3
ITEM glIAUTITV
Ba
One
8b
One
Sc One
8
Total
DESCRIPTION
Satellite Voting System as spec.
Spare voting rec/case
Install Item 8a
Items (8a through 8c)
MODEL UNIT COST TOTAL
VSDC $ 2,371.00 $ 2,371.00
H350096E
621.00 $ 621.00
$ 103.00
$ 3,095.00
9a One
9b One
9c One
9d Lot
9 Total
Control Consolette
Install Item 9a
Telephone Type control unit
Install Item 9c and line
Items (9a through 9c1)
5390152 $ 383.00
383.00
5130181 $ 187.00
51.00
187.00
34.00
$ 655.00
10a 70 800 MHz Mobiles, as specified
10b 70 Remove existing mobiles
10c 70 Mobile Antenna LS-390F(SP) $
10d 70 Install Item 10a
10e 70 Install Item 10c 29.00
10 Total Items (10a through 10e)
ST55GCU9211 $ 1,070.00 $ 74,900.00
57.00
11 .00
75.00
$
$
770.00
5,250.00
3,990.00
2,030.00
$86,940.00
$ 48.00 10 Optional Additional channels (preset)
ha One '2F. Base Station
llb One Base Antenna
11c Lot Trans. line/connectors
lid One Remove Existing Antenna
lie Lot Install Item Ila
Ilf Lot Install Item llb and 11c
11 Total Items (11a through 110
DC76886668 $ 2,227.00 2,227.00
PD220 $ 288.00
7/8" LDF $ /ft
288.00
330.00
inc
230.00
103.00
$ 3,178.00
12a One
12b One
12c One
I2d One
12 Total
Control Consolette
Install Item 12a
Telephone type control unit
Install 12c
Items (12a through 12d)
5398251 $ 446.00
446.00
51.00
5130201 204.00 $ 204.00
34.00
735.00
5390251 $ 369.00 $ 369.00
51.00
204,00
34.00
13a One Control Consolette
13b One Install Item 13a
13c One Telephone Type Control Unit
13d Lot Install Items 13c and line
13 Total Items (13a through 130 /3:31
5140281 $ 204.00
$ 658.00
We acknowledge receipt
of Addendum 01
GENE 1. ELECTRIF COMPANY
;
1 ,1
11 1.1
INCORPORATED IN ,THE STATE OF New York
FIRM NAME
SIGNATURE
PROPCAL
Page 4
ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION
14a One Control Consolette
14b One Install Item 14a
14c One Telephone Type Control Unit
14d One Install Item 14c and line
14 Total Items (14a through 144
I5a One Control Consolette
156 One Install Item 15a
15c One Telephone Type Control Unit
15d One Install Item I5c and line
15 Total Item (15a through 15d)
16 Lot Miscellaneous Equipment Specify
MODEL UNIT COST TOTAL
5390251 $ 369.00 $ 369.09
$ 51.00
51402111 $ 204.00 $ 204,00
$ 34,00
$ 650.00
5390251 $ 369.00 $ 369.00
$ 51.00
5140281 $ 204.00 $ 204.00
$ 34.00
$ 658.00
None
17 Lot Remove four existing bases and
accessories
Option 1 Lot Trade-in 42 mobiles/4 bases
$ 250.00 Optional
18 Discount for payment of invoices in 25 days 0 $ $ --
19 GRANT TOTAL BID: Items 1-17a minus 18 $124,579.09
Option 2 Telephone interconnect for base repeater
N/A
Optional
Following items enclosed in accordance with Paragraph 32
Items to be Submitted
Technical Data YES X NO
Equipment List
YES X NO
Certified Check or Bid Bond
YES X NO
Completion Date: Per Specifications days MO
A certified check or bidders bond in the amount of $ 6,230.00 , payable to the
City of Eden Prairie, representing five percent (5$) of sum total bil accompanies this
proposal.
PROPOSAL MUST BE SUBMIT:0 ON THIS FORM ONLY
INSTALLATION COMPANY General Comunications Inc.
ADDRESS OF INSTALLING CUIPANY 7400 Oxford St.. Minneapolis
SSA21—
i:332
GENERAL F.1-3 ELECTRIC
May 14, 1980
EQUIPMENT LIST
Eden Prairie
# 1901
ITEM
MODEL NUMBER & DESCRIPTION
la
SSVN80 Tower
lb
P01109 Antenna
lc
7/8" LDF Heliax
2a
VC75UAU96EV Station including meter, mike, voting
modification ?nd wattmeter
2b
DB4090 Duplexer
2c
42-85-01 Multi-coupler, Tx-Rx systems
2d
89-86-78017 Pre-sclector, Tx-Rx systems
2e
RG9 Cable
2f
CWID51B Station Identifier
3a
Same as 2a
3b
Same as 2b
3c
Same as 2c
3d
Same as 2d
3e
Same as 2f
3f
Same as 2e
3g P01109 Antenna
3i
7/8" LDF Heliax
4a
VSDC Voter including keying module, SD12 receiver
and cabinet
4b
W35AU96E Spare Receiver
4d
P01110 Antenna
4e
2" x 8' Pipe included in4g
4f
7/8" LDF Heliax
4h
Same as 2c
4i
Same as 2d
5a
539A1S2 MASTR Controller including VU meter and
footswitch
5c
513A181 Deskon II
6a
Same as 5a
6c
Same as Sc
7a
Same as 5a
7c
Same as Sc
8a VSDC Voter including keying module and receiver
8b
W35AU96E Spare receiver
9a Same as 5a
9c Same as 5c
10a ST550CU9211 Mobile including timer
10c LS390E-SP Antenna and cable
ha DC76RBG6613 Station including meter, mike and wattmeter
and 2nd receiver
lib
P0220 Antenna
13 ?)3
i3 3q
GENERAL fj ELECTRIC
Equipment List
Page 2
ITEM
MODEL NUMBER & DESCRIPTION
llc 7/8" LDF Heliax
12a 539B2S1 MASTR Controller including VU meter,
footswitch and line amplifier
12c 513A2B1 Deskon II
13a 539A2S1 MASTR Controller including VU meter and footswitch
13c 514A2131 Deskon II
14a Same as 13a
14c Same as 13c
15a Same as 13a
15c Same as 13c
CHEN. ELECTRIC
MOBILE
RADIO
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 4620 WEST 77TH STREET, SUITE 279
DEPARTMENT
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435. Phone (612) 831-2220
RESUME
PHILIP HEXOM
After graduating from high school in 1960, I completed a 11/2 year
course in electronics at Minneapolis Vo-Tech Institute. I then
worked as a technician-installer for Donnor Communications in
Minneapolis, the then GESS for 11/2 years until I was drafted into
the Army. While in the Army I worked as a field radio repair
specialist on FM equipment. Upon completion of my military duty,
I worked for 9 years for General Communications in Minneapolis,
a GESS. I started as a repair technician on GE mobile radios and
became Asst. Service Manager. This involved meeting with customers
and scheduling work for the other employees. I also became
involved with many large system projects such as the Minnesota
LEAA upgrade.
In 1975, I accepted my current position with the General Electric
Company as a District Service Manager.
I hold an FCC 1st class radio telephone license.
I have attended schools in Lynchburg, Virginia on such subjects as
Remote Control and Voting Systems. I have organized and put on
several successful service training seminars that typically have
150 or more attendees. I have worked with the State of Minnesota
as a Project Manager on the EMS System that General Electric was
awarded.
Ga. When in the opinion of the local Director of Public Safety, Fire Marshal or
Fire Investigator, there is a fire incident in their community that needs additional
trained investigative assistance, they shall be able to call on the participating
depart:,,ents to this agreement to get assistance of their trained investigator.
This rutual aid service is designed to supplement, not replace the services of the State
Fire Marshal's Office or the Arson Investigation Unit of the Hennepin County Shuriff's
Department or any like agency.
CITY OF BLOOMINGiON
By
BY
MPLS/ST. PAUL METROPOLITAN AIRPORT COMM.
By
By
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CITY OF MINNETONKA
By
By
By
By
CITY OF EDINA
CITY OF RICHFIELD
By
BY
By
By
CITY or GOLDEN VALLEY CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
By _By
By By
CITY OF HOPKINS
By
By
M3tp
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John Franc
DATE: May 16, 1980
RE: Liquor Store Lease
The proposed lease for a store on County Road #18 has square foot rentals
by year of $6.75, 6.95, 7.15, 7.95, 8.40, 8.90. The memo of May 15 showed
figures assuming a $6.95 rental cost. Our net profit using $800,000 in
sales at $8.40 per square foot should be at least $44,000 or 5.5% of sales.
To: Mayor and Council
From: John Frane
Date: May 15, 1980
Re: Liquor Store on County Road 018
The sales projection of the Super Valu store are as follows:
1981
6,700,000
1982
8,000,000
1983
9,600,000
1984
11,600,000
The following are conservative estimates of net profit at the sales
figures shown. The percentage is the percentage to the Super Valu
1981 projected sales.
Liquor Sales 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000
% of liquor to
grocery 6% 7.5% 9% 10.5%
Net -0- 11,000 24,000 37,000
Net as a percent
of sales 0%
2.2%
4.0% 5.3%
16121 2139-C1753
LAW orrocc•
LANG. PAULY 6, OPEC) ER130 N. LTD.
41013 tDB CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNEZIOTA 53402
'morn,. I. Lawn
141,CIER A. IFAF,AY
DAVID 14. ORECIEFFIOH
—
7.4041AS ORE1INC. AA.
litICHARD F. NOSOW
LAVIFIrAler ilKOLILUNO May 12, 1980
Mr. William McCallum
Attorney at Law
601 Shelard Tower
Minneapolis, MN 55426
RE: Proposed Municipal Liquor Store
Preserve Village Center
City of Eden Prairie
Dear Sir:
I have reviewed with Roger Ulstad a proposed lease forwarded
to him by Mr. Gibson concerning the above referenced shopping
center. We have revised the form by striking various provisions
which we consider not applicable or objectionable to the city
and have interlined certain additions all as shown in the
enclosed copy. In addition we have the following comments:
1. Mr. Gibson's letter of transmittal indicates the lease
will have a three year term with a three year option.
The option provision is not contained in the form for-
warded. This should be added.
2. Provisions relating to liability of the city and insurance
coverage are subject to further review by the city
insurance agent and, if necessary, the insurer.
3. Article IV, Section 4 should be revised to indicate the
percentage of tenant's share of the costs referred to in
the section.
4. Article VI, Section 1. Part of the page is missing.
5. Article VIII, Section 2 limits landlord's obligation to
make repairs. Is it anticipated that the individual
premises will have its own equipment described therein?
This should he included in the plans and specifications
to be a part of the lease.
6. Article VIII, Section 3. Perhaps the reference to Bureau
Companies could be more specifically described.
1 :,3.(21A
Mr. William McCallum
May 12, 1980
Page Two
7. Article IX, Section 4. It is intended that the city be
permitted to remove all of the equipment and fixtures
installed by it in the premises upon expiration of the
term of the lease. While the section seems to except out
trade fixtures, it does contain a prohibition from removal
of fixtures in any manner attached to the floors. This
provision should be further clarified.
8. Article X, Second paragraph appears to contain some
redundancy or typographical error.
9. Article XI, Section 3. The percentage of the additional
payment required by tenant should be inserted.
10. Article XV. Landlord's right to enter the premises shall
be limited to the time the tenant, its agents or employees
are present.
11. Article XXI. The percentage of additional rent to be paid
by tenant should be inserted. Also, what is intended by
the second to last sentence of the paragraph referring to
proration of the first and last years of the lease term?
12. Article XXIII, Section 1 contains a reference to liability
insurance according to coverage elsewhere in this lease.
The specific provision should be referred to in this paragraph.
13. Article XXIII, Section 15. There should be added an exhibit,
relating to the improvements, of the plans and specifications,
to be furnished by tenant.
14. Article XXVII, Section I should be revised to refer to
the plans and specifications of improvements to be made
by tenant and should express landlord's consent thereto.
I understand that Mr. Ulstad will be discussing the annual rental
fee with Mr. Gibson and that information will be furnished for
inclusion in the agreement. I would appreciate receipt of the
revised lease agreement in accordance with the enclosure and
our comments for further review.
Sincerely,
Roger A. Pauly
RAP:bl
cc: Roger Ulstad
MFMMIN
TO: Mayor and City Council
TURD: Roger P. Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services -PAL_
DATE: May 1S, 1980
SUBUT.T: Stied] t au t Property - Riley Lake
Attached to this memorandum is the report from staff to the Parts, Recreation
and Natural Resources Commission dated April 30, 1980. This report summarizes
a staff rtvicw of the site and several possibilities and alternatives staff
recommended to the Commission- Also, attached is a schematic plan on how the Swedlund
property might possibly he developed. This schematic plan Was simply proposed
to show possible parking locations and development possibilities. It is not
intended to show any final park plan.
At the May 5, 1980 meeting, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Conunission
toured the Swedlund property and the Schaitherger park property at Riley Lake.
The general consensus of the Commission was that the Swedlund property should
be aquired as a community park site to be developed as a picnic area and swimming
area, and po,sibly a boat launching area. The motion was as follows: "Tangen
moved to recommend to the Council purchasing the Swedlund property to include
a 200:60 foot parcel in Carver County if possible. It is reconmended to continue
use of the Schaitherger property as public boat access to Riley Lake. Pond
seconded the motion and it carried unanimously."
Upon review of the Schaitberger property, the Commission recommended the following
changes to be completed this year to help eliminate existing boat launching
problems.
1. Removing three of the existing trees adjacent to the road and
existing access to allow doubling the size of the access. This
would allow two boats to launch at a time rather than the single
launch that is available at this time.
2. Widening the road shoulder on both sides immediately south of the
boat access. The wide shoulder on the cast side of the road would
allow cars with boats that are waiting to launch to wait without
blocking traffic on Riley Late Road. The shoulder on the west
side of Riley Late Road, south of the access, would allow cars
with boat trailers that have just pulled out of the late to pull
away from the launch site for tieing down withou' blocking Riley
Lake Road or the launch site.
The Coni:,sion felt the Council should not cow .. idol' sell tog t I, e Sehaitherger
site oat il it is certain t h at a boat latutch site on thc Swedlund property is
feasible. Several CoLmission members also felt that it might be wise to keep
ScLaitiwrBer site to serve store as a neighborhood prt (act ire use park)
for the sent lanist area Of town, A it hough, a nei ghborhood part is not nceded
at this 410, S(VV't ii:' in the future a park will be needed in that area and that
property is certain 11) he very expensive.
13qo
-2-
Staff recommends the Council authorize staff to negotiate ncquisitien of
Swedtnnd property ond that the funding source be a combination of rcirLursement
from Metro Council and catdi pork fees.
BL:md
11 -....„.... i
•••• i '•-•,_ ..... / N. f...L. ......,_,
7 ... / ..",........ ........ I ....,
(
\\,.. .‘
-....„. 1
\ 4' 4,447/
NORTH _
rs-rt,61
`..
'S.
\
\
n \ c \ \ \ •
\\ \-- .• \ \‘‘‘\\
/ / / /
.
4 , --
/ / . \ \\,*,4*,- k %
/ \ \ \
/4.'rts' ‘‘ \
\ \ \
\ \ \ \ 1 1 \
1 \ \ 1 1 'vim. \
\ , --*--- \ \ \ \ k i novro co....1,4 , ,... \l, \t. 1
\\\ \ \\ \I I .--4 i 1 k . ,stlp 1 . n \ \ , ., 5 1 i n i 1 \ / ;
..---"/ ; H i ,
i , , ,
-1<:(
/
/ / .
// ,
.. ---.." e ti ,.... - - - .
, \ . \ \ 1 .
\<`1\ . \ ,;,..-
\ , \ `• , •
\ ••‘ ' "... ‘7:Ar ,___ _ I 1-,1
rekitc. Aro, II I I
gti t ••• , 1/ / /./// / • N • .
_
Parls, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
hob Lambert, Director of Comunity
April 30, 19A
Riley she Pork
At die April A, IOP.0 'ad lop, the Commission reviewed the appraisals
of tin. ploperl) ;old the Swedlued property. After covsid-rohle
disrosi,jon ou the pros ond coos of both site::, 'P itt 'ii moved to iontiuoe
the it,.; to the P.:1y 5, tO;'i tilt tip. At that ti.,ae, to tour the Swedluna
property and then reviiw a !',cheawitic plan for the Swcdlund property.
You will note, the :;chematic plan indicates that six of the fifteen
exi.t.t.in:; I,iii lding' would re:4ain on the site, and one, Witherspoon Lodge
woald he replaced with a open sided park site
The site would be dividcd into 3 areas. The majority of the site is
dominat,,d by a SO coot high hill at the center of the site. The top
of ilia hill would be developed as a picnic area. Parking for 21 cars
would be provided on the top of the hill. The eastern sido of the site
wouldie developed as a swb..ming beach area. Parking for $6 cars would
be providod in this area (approximately 26 trees of 4" diaw.cter or greater
would to rel'ioved to sceinvo,late the parking sad roadway). The swimming
beach, rpproxiiiately 190' of frontz .,g, would be developed by scw grading
for the beach area that would tlutt would result in diverting some of
the reaeff r.o..:1 the intcrmittent str.-..sam approximately SO' to the cast.
This pit- iii and divor.-.ion of water would not affect the adjacent property
and in fact woold not occur within SO of the boundnry linc. Sand for
a swimming beach would have to be hauled in, as it is haulod in at the
SchailiSer site. This swimming beach area could acco;=odole a;Troximitely
100 people vory comfortably. The swimming boach itself is a very shillow
sandy hpttom with ecca.:ional weeds. The weeds would be less of a problom
as ac ti v it y en II, h c a c h is increased. The beach would be loss of a pcohlem
fairly well protected bay and with several marker buoys would eliminate
any high speed boat traffic in that area.
Tho western Pit sill of tho site could be developed very nicely into an
adequate boat. Lainching facility. However, there is one major problem, the
Swedlund propefly lino does not quite reach the water line alety thr va:ttern
slvire. Its City would have to acquire approrimitely 2S0' oi shoreline
to provide a good aCce:'.:.; for boat launching. The shoreline is undevelopable
beeauo thore in only appro:imately A' in depth from the Swedlnad property
line to t !;horAino. ilowever, the exist ing property owner has not been
centactod and it nnlwown whether he would be willing to sell. furthermore,
the Siodlund we'tern boundary lino is also the City ana County boundary line.
lIel .oforo, the that is required to extend into the lake is located in
Ca rx or Count y ant the C i ty of Chanhassen.
-2-
In 1979 there were five da y s in the y ear when there was a total or more
tlrut 27 launches from the existin g Riley Lake Park. Therefore, the
ch, alt C ph an show!: a car/trailer parkin g area thot would acck,;:slodote
28 vohicle ith trailers. In order to g rade in this roadwa y and parkin g
area 24 tvees of 4" in diameter would have to he removed.
As y ou can see from the schematic drawin r.s, the site con he developed into
an ad q e q uate cum:wait y park that Lould provide boot launchin, switsmin g
and 0 pk..nic arca. I loWCI'Vr t here are some problems with the site
especiall y with the boat launch proposal. There arc several alternatives
to consider:
1. Purchose the Swedlund pr.vorty znid develop as the soh ,l!rivic plan
indiestes. This would include purchase of thc 700:0O' piece
er property in Carver County for development of the boat launch.
2. Purchase the Swedlund property and develop as a picnic area and
suirmin g beach only. Continue to use the Schaithorger park propert y
as the public boat access to Riley Lake.
3. Reject acquisition. of the Swodlund property and invest in
improvin g the Schaitber g er property. The following improvements
would be made:
a. Widen Riley Lake Road an extra lane the entire length
of the park propert y to allow for stacking of hoots
that are u.oitin g to launch.
b. Provide another boat latnich area just north of the
existing area. This area provides more room between
the lakeshore and the road and would allow (WO 100 ta
to launch at the same Unto, which would redact: the
stacking on Rile y Lake Road.
c. Tear dbwn the largo green buildin g on the Schaitherger
properly and construct an open sided park shelter to
encoura g e more picnic ttse.
d. Transplant 15-20 six to eight foot evergreens along the
southern herder of the propert y to help eliminate some
of the conflict bet wren the park users ond the resident
Ii, the south.
e. Construct a fence along the northern property to t•st:dilish
a definite park boundary to eliminate con II ct wi th the
property owner to the north, especially in the hall field
area.
Stafi that the Swedlnud property is the most significant 1:4:4,1 form on
the Pi ley shore and sheold he acquired for public par!, pirpe-,es. fitaft .
a.o.,414! aciati ,it out of the t.„,edl im d property with deve.1441 ,...a.nt to occ ur
b.i..ed ea Sc't si-la—rIt ic plan (.1 4.'4,1l• iled waster plan ueuld Irmo to 140
arproved prior to ;lay devetopmen:). tort her that the City attempt to 31%11.11 tl`
I 11 4' Alllte I;lad cut t Ile dc of the property to develop an adequate
oig
-3-
boat launching lacility and tbat the City would rotain tbe Schaitberger
propcity to contilme twat launching activities until the aequisition would
bn C)) 'l At th:tt time, staff would recommend the City consid,•1-
the Schaitberger propvrty, as this property is undesirable as a City park
en I It Lake Road would be realigned around the park. Due to the
proxh,ity of the railroad tracks and the alignment of County Road I, this
would he a very expensive proposition.
111.:md
MEKMANDUM
TO:
THRU:
RCM
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Community ServicesA L-
April 17, 1980
Swedlund Property on Riley Lake
The City Council considered information regarding the Swedlund property
on Riley Lake at their February 19 and March 4 meetings. At the March
4 meeting, the City Council authorized staff to obtain appraisals on
the existing Riley Lake property (also known as the Schaitberger property)
and on the Swedlund property. Attached to this report is information
from each of those appraisals. The existing Riley Lake property was
appraised at $130,000. The Swedlund property was appraised at $324,500.
As indicated in the February 22 report, staff feels that the Swedlund
property would make a far superior community park than would the existing
Riley Lake Park. The existing park has problems that are caused by the
proximity of homes on both sides of the park and the road alignment
directly through the park adjacent to the beach.
If the Council chooses to pursue acquisition of this parcel, staff would
recommend acquisition of this park with the money that will be refunded
by the Metropolitan Council for Bryant Lake and Anderson Lakes Parks.
Furthermore, if the Swedlund property is acquired, staff would recommend
the Council consider selling the Schaitberger property and using those
funds for the necessary improvements to the site ie. roads, parking lots,
beach improvement, etc.
BL:md
C. R. Brackett, SRA
Vice-President
CHASE • BRACKETT COMPANY
CONOU AAAAAA
035-$0 00
April II, 1980
City of Eden Prairie
Mr. Robert A. Lambert
Community Services Director
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Dear Mr. Lambert:
Pursuant to your request, we have made a careful study of the property
at 9235 Lake Riley Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, legally described
within this report.
In our opinion, the market value of the subject land and building as
of March 18, 1980, was:
ONE HUNDRED THIRTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
($130,000)
In arriving at the market value, an analysis was made of the Cost
and Market Data Approaches to value. Properties used in the Market
Data Approach are significantly comparable. The differences in the
properties are in their size, location and refinements, which have
been reflected.
This valuation reflects any outstanding special assessments as paid.
If we can be of further service to you, please contact us.
Very truly yours,
CHASE -BRACKETT COMPANY
CRB/km
•ttiTAOON PANIC TOWZR. 4040 VIKING DRIVE • MINHCAPOL11.14/NNISOTA 05450
173 (16
CHASE-BRACKETT COMPANY
PENTAGON PARK TOWER . 4940 VIKING DRIVE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435
APPRAISER'S REPORT ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
Maml O• ArPLIC ANT City of Eden Prairie (Schaitherger Property)
••• ttttt 0005555 2,ntE, ARO NO. 9235 Lake Ri ley Road
coo, Eden Prairie coo.e.t_ Hennepin STATE Minnesota
PropCr Cy 1 &at i f icat ion Number : 19-116-22-34-0006
PcIrt of Sect fon 19.,,_Tovnship 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, ilinnesota
,Ser-21 .et e 1 tided.
t.).
.
DAST•NCE rRem GEN'S., Or mETROPOLIT•N AREA 26 miles southwest.
wt.' of •••,••••,,,,,„ ,......•.,„ It .A.,,,0000000 residential
sc•i....., A n nnexis.taTILLy 25 % RUN.T UP TREND Or NCIGNBORNOOD improving
•sta•SI y•LvE RANCE Or Nr40.00,4000 $ 75,000 T o • 27 ,000
new O ,Ntst rRO•TRT ICS R•NSE IN AGE rROM T 30 years
•„6„,,,,, This is a rural neighborhood in character. The area has scattered develop-
-,• nents_of single family homes as well as those bordering Lake Riley. Major highways
are 1-2 miles distant.
.,,,, Approx. 585 F.E. on Riley Lake Rd. X triangular depth ,. 9.07 acres x4xi.:
X ••••1•_ INS Open ZONING .
Blacktop •..,,,,,c,..a CURS& GUTTER -.—
X [SSC TA.C,TV GAS --
tu•IC• Private
SEW•Cl_ SYSTEM Private
commENTS /CONTOuN. 015.1.09 raaraw,rs.LANOTC•PING. ETC.IThe site contours from the higher eleva-
tiOn at the Mpls. and St. Louis R.R. propert—yThW—d-O-V-in to Lik-e RiTcy Road and to
the lakeshore frontage. It is partly wooded. K3 acre building site is require--4
hut due to the width or this site, 2 bi-TiTaTi±g sites are assumed to he poss InTe -Tri iii, .
0
,
a
•
o
oir
;
t • o «
.
,0511) ance. Si nO e family residence
....4 :—Contemporary Oilluril: rambler
•OUNOsTiON Concrete block
IOR N•LI.S Stucco, stone trim and vertical wood trim
• OOP Pitch and gravel
•,,,,,,•S AND GOrtmSPOul3 Ca I Valli zed iron
•A•stOatm•TE ACE pf STROCTuNt. 20 YEARS CST, REMAINING ECONOMIC E.'S 40-45 VC•AS '
0.um•l5 Or at OROOmS I down, 4 up MOUSER o r O•y.• 3/4 down, 1 up ..„,••• cm. 'Toast' 1 TOTAL ROOMS 3 down, 6 up
tt•Out OfTCAIRE oft Or SPACE AT ALL LE 004.5 IENTRIES, HALLS. Rooms. POREN(S, LITILIT•, ETC.)
j.:1!;e:Lent : There is a large kitchen with a generous eating area and knotty pine
walls and c9phoargis and a vas spiaee heater. The living roma with knotty p i n e yell s overlooks the lake across the street. The one bedroom Ins walls and _plaster
_ceiling, The laundry-furnace room also has plasterod WZI1 is and ceiling. is _There
3/i_Lrith...._r_ire is a . two car tuck-under garace with two overhead worr_q_doors.
-1Tit level r On the mail-riloor the one eat r an ee is at the hack, opening flit 0 the
-1:.:C1-,--hTel h.:ay and ki tch,‘n. There Is a rariii:Iinily si:!e Ii tc r7i' tliliaz tlwooZ
(ohs nets :Ind f ormica countert o p, TririvirTg Coom has a Tr—Plaster cov,-7,1 ceiling, _
and door 0",•n i ng to a deck perch. There are four bedrooms with closets and one
_b_a 1 htoom u'l th a formi ca topped vani ty.
Lake.....Riley_Road bisects the site at the front just east of the shoreline and beach.
_
_
1
Plaster, oak ponel, pine panel
.0* t
4•0 .....
• ..••••.•n• ly_t 1111_1-yo1i, t .cl n on , 3 bedrooms and ill I Way
7--',I' d tile ortL , .
t .811 ..B.Cs 71 CO.PANY
440040
Concrete, asphalt tile
*41.1-0
Plaster and paneled
rou...•414
3/4
00,0.f
ceriltniC tile
ceramic tile
pra!rtAr"'
Ceramic tiTZ
.....,..., Copper ....10. 00014S
X ••••0001 X
CLECTR,Cal "STEN
100 7iTli-1usv
....... ,. ....., _ __ ctito•G __ assumed
lonlox IV rdN__
Enured air;SIegler LP gas space .—
••••-•4 '
COOLMO
. i ... _.r.tt j.,..n ;s 7.1....itisni 1 ne heater „A .,,,,,.. A-Cre rag,
Andctiam cas•:-.1ent and double hung, wood storms and screens
A.O. Smith EP gas ,0 „,, 1,,,,lol‘, caner
D9 ..,,,,,, Hotpoint ••••••••••• .. .
• •n ••••G• e•••••• CZ(1-
.
COOK TO 4 pyr u SV1 III 1.40
Ceiling
4.41 22" x 24' M.16040( c..s 2
••, • ..0• Turk under Fair -good
7 I ..., Concriqe block :::::"°'2 wood overhead
• Concrete •n •
400•
• ••••0••••••••
• 4•••••• lights and (1) Sears automatic door opener
crw.hed rock and dirt
• • ••
•
,,•. • • Le• _14 "'d
• •• • 444
404 •,604
••••• I. •OI. D off —. E
I
I
•••••• • •• •••••
•••••• 4,1 •4(4.4. 1111=11111
Ull
Will .....••• ,•• •.•••••• •• ....... IIIII
....... • •• ........... •••• 111111111110.
•••• • 4•4 • •• 40.,.. 0,.••*.t• INI Mil
4 • • •• ..... • •••(••• ...... ...A, • IIIIIM
.IIIIIIIIIIC=Il la
...DIV.°. De ..... 10• MUM
r . (0.1,1••e• Oa.,1•106
1.1.C•ilet••n •••
WI
1”.1..•, E
OV ..... Of a•0••••••••••n • 0 64 =Ma X
OOOLVI• I to.••n i•• or I.O.W.* .1 nI• LIU
1.1110, •n • •to•n •n •110. all X
•••O•• •o0 6.6 ....... ,*.• 11111111=all .--
01,0• • The exterior trim and deck is in need of repair
•4 ••••Ost • 0. ••• ••&&&&& CL••
4114 411 pa int ing.
• ---
tl,096.62 non -liomvstead tax
-11o ,Tr-C157,7 appear to he very 77,177.
IS t iSMC NTS ••••• ••••••• v•• ••••,••nn • 0•11{1•• •••• .11.•••• •••• I
7.• Ii4. ccOl7l1:
C.00.0.(otte
CALCULATIONS
•••• ••••1 •
story
1 ',tory --
LEVEL 1,608 sQu•RE FEET
ITEORD LEVEL 1,608 $0,•••E cEET
1•n •0 CCCCC SQUARE CELT
yev•L 3,216 SOu•RE FEET
fRet al
1 00•.E. FEET
• SOuso•E FEEL
sOw•sic rEET
TOTAL
SQUARE FEET
24' 58' . 1,392
. SQUARE CCU(
6 . 36 216 SOV&RE 'LET
X SQUARE vet?
14 —..--..-- ' SOusPL FEET
X •— '
SQuARE FEET
X
SOu•RL FEET
X a. _ COUsRE FEET
Fo•ST LEVEL. TOT•L 1,608 •au•RE FEET
:O t t •s r eo AcH
_ 3,216 SE1.7L1`.• $ 22.50 •Le sQ.CT. 72,350
shut, Gsvo•GE OR E•••ORT
.. Inc) udiTtr-
..... EERE••T COST •••E•
0$0 •ELI •T I OR
• ••%S.E•L OE TE•10 0 •TtON
•$,•C S.0•••L 0•SoLLSEIME3
ILISfte•RE 01•110LCIILENEE
•OE•T
0.10.0040 ......
21.750
TO • ‘. ADJUSTUESET 21,750
DEP•CEIS TEL, COST
50,600
s 9 0 ;700
•L US
141,300
.1.0,1 Istp v•LUI ay *we COST ••RXR•C
"
.t.d•; t 1 1 (.2,....P•av
MARKET DATA LAND
Lotus Drive, Halstads Bay, Minnetrista
District 36, Plat 40634, Parcels 1025 & 1035
Not known
Not known
1978
R-1
7.6 acres
$17,100
This is a wooded parcel of land with a gentle slope
to Halstads Bay of Lake Minnetonka. There is approx-
imately 315' on the lake.
County Road 44, Halstads Bay, Minnetrista
District 36, Plat 40626, Parcels 1040 & 1060
Freshwater Biological Foundation
Pemtom
1978
R-2
17 acres
$20,588
This is a hilly wooded site with frontage on Halstads
Bay, Lake Minnetonka. Since purchase it has been platted
into 8 lakeshore lots, 9 lake access lots and 4 outlots
for private boat slips and roads.
North side of Highway 101 and south shore of Lotus
Lake, Chanhassen
Part of SE1/4, Section 24, Township 116N, Range 23W,
Carver County
Char-Lynn Foundation
Bloomberg
1977
R-1A Residential agriculture
23.03 acres
$10,377
This tract of land has 705' of frontage on Lotus Lake.
The elevation is 960' near the highway and sloping to
a lake elevation of 897' which indicates of drop of 63*.
Sale 01 LOCATION
LEGAL
SELLER
BUYER
PATE OF SALE
ZONING
SIZE
PRICE PER ACRE
COMnENTS
Sole /2 LOCATION
LEGAL
SELLER
BUYER
DATE OF SALE
ZONING
SIZE
PRICE PER ACRE
COMMENTS
Sale $3 LOCATION
LEGAL
SELLER
BUYER
DATE OF SALE
ZONING
SIZE
PRICE PER ACRE
COM'iERTS
MARKET DATA LAND
North side of State Highway 75, west of County Road
4 and south of Round Lake, Eden Prairie
Part of E ll of SW1/4 of Section 8, Township 116, Range 22,
Hennepin County
Not known
Cliff Swendson
1978
Residential 1 and 2 family
27 acres
$9,000
2-4 acres of the land is low in the center. It is south
of Round Lake but does not have frontage on the lake.
Sok
WATION
LICAL
SELLER
WiER
HATE OF SALE
7ONISC
SIZE
ma PER ACRE
COMMEXIS
The nalcn an nhown have been considered in arriving at our opinion of the market
valtA• ot the land for the subject property. Adjustments have been made for items
of variance wach as time, location, desirability of lake, contour, and other
pettio,nt factors. After careful analysis of each of these factors, it is our
opinion that the market value of this parcel of land is $10,000 per acre.
9.07 acres X $10,000 ... $90,700
1
CHAftE - BRACKETT COMPANY
MARKET DATA APPROACH
ADO
0536 1land Terr
2,900_sq. ft. Sya
:921g Lake Ei3ey 131
3_,288 sq_. ft, no
L 15702_Cedar Eidge
2 3 04)s_q._ ft. t, fi
MSS
:ICC
NO. OF ROOMS
13
NO.OF BATHS
3
NO. OF STORIES
1
SALE PRICE I DATE
165,000 12/79
rtial best., 2 car tuck under garage, /4, Bit. 1952 & remodelod,vike
128,000 — 10 .7't- vd. 10 3 2
!)smt. 3 car att. arage, A/C
10
Blt. 1974
3
Lake Riley
1 Oa d 141,200 12/Pr-
iiEdlod beet., 2 cu art. eara e, A/C, El . 1957, Red Rock Lake
YHA ••C•E C.TA0 COmnAnAULES PAYE SEEN ADAlt TED FOR ITEMS OF VARIATION AND THE SOLE P
R
I
C
E
O
r
C
A
C
,. ADJUSTED 9v 1 NE NET CHFRENENCL•
inc. 7.1)4 acres 130,0UU INDICATED VALUE BY THE MARKET APPROACH S
COMMENTS As directed the cottage, tavern and miscellaneous equipment have not been
Inspected and assigned no value in this appraisal.
The sUbJect locatis rural and wooded. it is d close-in location -QTfh access CO
major services. This site of 9.07 acres has been assumed as 2 sites, though 1U acres
are required. The subsoil is assumed to be normally stable, though no soil tests were
available. Comparables are included on an acreage basis.
This house is in fair condition though it was constructed of good materials. The
soffits and trim are in need of repair and repainting, which should be done to preserve
the_propertv. Some minor stucco repair is also needed. Inside normal redecorating is
all that would be needed and some carpeting. Some ceiling leaks were noted which
would cause question about the roof condition. .
The Cost Approach tends to set the upper limit of value. The Market Data Approach
represents buyers' and sellers' actions in the market. This is the best indicator of
value in your appraiser's opinion. Therefore, the value indicated by this approach is
also the final value estimate.
Currently new conventional financing may be very hard to obtain. Therefore, the
time it takes to sell could be longor than normal. Properties with existing high loans
that can be assumed or those eligible for VA or ITIA financing are apt to sell more
__aulciax_iilisLIQr a higher price
4-.
TN.* REPORT •SsumEs No RESIFONSIOUITII FOR LEGAL M•TTEHE OR MARKETABILITY OF TI
T
L
E
.
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
H
A
S
K
E
E
N
Pw•MC ALL, INSPECTED FOR THIS APPRAISAL. IT HAS BEEN •FtprFAISED IN FEE SIMPLE •NO ASSUMED TO OE WITHIN TNIC ,••t LOT LINCS. 7 NC VA 1 • IN Twis REPORT IS 1407 GUARANTEED, BUT OC,1EVED TO At RELIABLE AND CORRECT. CODY. PENIATtON FOR IND REPORT IS NOT CONTINGENT UPON THE VALUE REPORTED, WE HAVE NO PERSONAL INTEREST IN THE PA 09E9".
CERTIFICATION OF FAIR MARKET VALUE
LAND 4ASSUFAING SPECIAL •SSESSIHENTS P•tEll • 90.700
IMPROVEMENTS $ 39.300
EXTRAS lace PACE Re
IN utt. OPNVION. TRU, PROPERTY WOULD SELL WITHIN _nil DAYS
0. A CAM: SAS'S roll
• 130,000
/1/712
//%"7!L
L. K. ErfnekCEIV.ilra----
OAT H 3 /18/80
/4
APP9A.E9 ist.L. Chase,-SRA--
1;) CHASE -BRACKETS COmPANY
ad,
— CHASE • BRACKETT COMPANY
April 11, 1980
Vice-President
6),
W. L. Chase, SRA
President
WLC/kM
C. R. Brackett, SRA
CO."1,
PHONE 837.5600
City of Eden Prairie
Mr. Robert A. Lambert
Community Services Director
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Dear Mr. Lambert:
Pursuant to your request, we have made a careful study of the
property at 9000 Riley Lake Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota,
legally described as Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision #372,
Hennepin County.
In our opinion, the market value of the subject land and building
asof March 18, 1980, is:
THREE HUNDRED TWENTY FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS
($324,500)
In arriving at the market value, an analysis was made of the Cost
and Market Data Approaches to value. Properties used in the Market
Data Approach are significantly comparable. The differences in the
properites are in their size, location and refinements, which have
been leflected.
This valuation reflects any outstanding special assessments as paid.
If we can be of further service to you, please contact us.
Very truly yours,
CHASE-BRACKETT COMPANY
PENTAGON PARK TOWER. 4940 VIKING DRIVE • MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 1134315
1-3137,4':
RCAL (111,116
• C •
—CHAGE • R ACK ETT COMPANY
COMSLUTAN7S
PURPOSE OF APPRAISAL
The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the present day
Market Value.
Market Value is defined in "Appraisal Terminology", published
by the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers.
As defined by the courts: "The highest price estimated in terms
of money which a property will bring if exposed for sale in the
open market allowing a reasonable time to find a purchaser who
buys with knowledge of all the uses to which it is adapted and
for which it is capable of being used.
Frequently, it is referred to as the price at which a willing
seller would sell and a willing buyer would buy, neither being
under abnormal pressure.
It is the price expectable if a reasonable time is allowed to
find a purchaser and if both seller and prospective buyer are
fully informed."
CHASE-BRACKETT COMPANY
SITE DESCRIPTION
The subject land includes 14.3 acres in a peninsula on the north side of
Lake Riley.
It has approNimately 3,225 feet of shoreline. At either end of the subject
property the land is just above the water level. However, the majority of
the frontage is a bluff high above the lake with a commanding overview.
The land is wooded with mature deciduous trees, mostly maple.
Riley Lake Road circles around the north side of the lake from County
Road 1 and provides access to the subject property.
CHASE -1117ACKE 7 7 COMPANY
DESCRIPTION OF BUILDINGS
Main House
This one story, rustic walkout ramble
r
w
a
s
b
u
i
l
t
i
n
1
9
6
8
.
I
t
i
s
b
u
i
l
t
of interlocking cut cedar logs. The r
o
o
f
i
s
h
a
n
d
s
p
l
i
t
c
e
d
a
r
s
h
i
n
g
l
e
s
.
In 3973 an addition of 12' x 32' for a
m
a
s
t
e
r
b
e
d
r
o
o
m
a
n
d
b
a
t
h
w
a
s
m
a
d
e
to the south end of the house, plus a screen porch, 3 sliding glass doors,
deck, patio, kitchen built-ins, cabinet
s
,
extensive landscaping, fencing
of $9,000, etc. The entry has a tile floor and guest closet. The living
room is carpeted and has a fireplace a
n
d
p
a
t
i
o
d
o
o
r
s
t
o
t
h
e
d
e
c
k
.
T
h
e
dining room is carpeted and adjoins the kitchen which has many cab
i
n
e
t
s
and cupboards with an Americana double
r
e
f
r
i
g
e
r
a
t
o
r
,
G
E
v
e
n
t
f
a
n
a
n
d
hood, GE set-in self cleaning range and
o
v
e
n
,
G
E
d
i
s
h
w
a
s
h
e
r
,
a
n
d
s
i
n
g
l
e
sink. There is a sliding glass door t
o
t
h
e
s
c
r
e
e
n
p
o
r
c
h
.
T
h
e
m
a
s
t
e
r
bedroom is at the end of the living ro
o
m
a
n
d
h
a
s
a patio door to the
deck plus a 314 bath with a double lava
t
o
r
y
v
a
n
i
t
y
a
n
d
d
r
e
s
s
i
n
g
r
o
o
m
a
r
e
a
with many closets. At the other end o
f
t
h
e
h
o
u
s
e
t
h
e
r
e
a
r
e
3
b
e
d
r
o
o
m
s
and a bath with tub and shower. All of the bedrooms ar
e
c
a
r
p
e
t
e
d
.
The basement is 100% excavated and has
a
f
i
n
i
s
h
e
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
r
o
o
m
w
i
t
h
a fireplace and a walkout. It has vinyl a
s
b
e
s
t
o
s
t
i
l
e
f
l
o
o
r
,
p
r
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
e
d
paneling and accoustic tile ceiling.
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
n
L
P
g
a
s
Lennox forced air heating system with
h
u
m
i
d
i
f
i
e
r
,
B
r
a
d
f
o
r
d
g
a
s
a
u
t
o
m
a
t
i
c
water heater, open toilet and sink, r
o
m
e
x
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
s
y
s
t
e
m
,
a
n
d
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
well with submersible pump. The house
i
s
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
e
d
b
y
2
"
x
1
0
"
f
l
o
o
r
joists, 36 inches on center, and concrete block foundation walls.
The interior ceilings are all cathedral
f
i
n
i
s
h
e
d
w
i
t
h
c
e
d
a
r
p
l
a
n
k
i
n
g
as
are most of the interior walls.
The condition inside and out is excelle
n
t
.
The surrounding landscaping is very de
c
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
w
i
t
h
m
a
n
y
c
e
d
a
r
t
i
e
r
e
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
walls, walkways, fountains and fencing.
Dimensions: 51' x 28' = 1,428 sq. ft.
12' x 32' = 384 sq. ft.
TOTAL 1,812 sq. ft.
Screen porch 228 sq. ft.
Deck 570 sq. ft.
Garage
This large two car garage is finished with painted siding, rolle
d
a
s
p
h
a
l
t
roof, and has two wood overhead doors
a
n
d
a
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
d
o
o
r
.
I
t
i
s
b
u
i
l
t
o
n
a concrete slab and wired with romex. I
t
i
s
i
n
g
o
o
d
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
fifteen years old.
Dimensions: 24' x 36' .* 864 sq. ft.
CHASE-fp:ACK 11 COS n PANY
FULTON MEMORIAL LODGE
This is a one story building and
i
s
t
h
e
n
e
w
e
s
t
l
o
d
g
e
.
I
t
i
s
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
twenty years old. It has stained s
i
d
i
n
g
,
d
o
u
b
l
e
h
u
n
g
a
n
d
p
u
s
h
-
o
u
t
c
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
windows and asphalt shingle gabl
e
d
r
o
o
f
.
T
h
e
r
e
i
s
a
c
o
v
e
r
e
d
o
p
e
n
p
o
r
c
h
o
n
the front. The activity room has a
h
i
g
h
a
r
c
h
e
d
c
c
l
u
t
e
x
c
o
v
e
r
e
d
c
e
i
l
i
n
g
,
large stone fireplace with wood bo
x
,
k
n
o
t
t
y
p
i
n
e
p
a
n
e
l
e
d
w
a
l
l
s
,
a
n
d
v
i
n
y
l
asbestos tile floor. There arc fo
u
r
g
a
s
w
a
l
l
f
u
r
n
a
c
e
s
.
T
h
e
r
e
i
s
a
b
e
d
r
o
o
m
with a wall furance. At the other end is the elevated sta
g
e
w
h
i
c
h
h
a
s
sheetrock walls and also has a st
o
n
e
f
i
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
.
I
t
c
a
n
b
e
u
s
e
d
a
s
a
separate room - divided with a cu
r
t
a
i
n
.
A
t
t
h
i
s
e
n
d
o
f
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
i
s
a small kitchen as well as the sta
i
t
w
a
y
t
a
t
h
e
b
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
.
T
h
e
b
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
is 16' by 40' built of concrete b
l
o
c
k
s
,
w
i
t
h
2
"
x
1
0
"
f
l
o
o
r
j
o
i
s
t
s
,
1
6
"
o
n
center. It contains a storeroom,
m
e
n
'
s
a
n
d
w
o
m
e
n
'
s
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
s
,
f
u
r
n
a
c
e
room with Luxaire LP gas forced a
i
r
f
u
r
n
a
c
e
,
3
0
g
a
l
l
o
n
a
u
t
o
m
a
t
i
c
g
a
s
w
a
t
e
r
heater, and 100 amp electrical se
r
v
i
c
e
.
T
h
e
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
i
s
fair
inside and out. There is a great
d
e
a
l
o
f
d
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
.
Dimensions: 80' x 30' = 2,400 sq
.
f
t
.
12' x 16' = 192 sq. ft.
12' x 16' = 192 sq. ft.
2,784 sq. ft.
Covered porch, 12' x 48' 576 sq. ft.
Basement, 16' x 42' = 672 sq. ft.
Knox Lodge
This is a one story building appr
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
t
w
e
n
t
y
-
f
i
v
e
y
e
a
r
s
o
l
d
.
I
t
h
a
s
stained siding, French windows, a
s
p
h
a
l
t
s
h
i
n
g
l
e
r
o
o
f
w
i
t
h
s
o
m
e
g
a
l
v
a
n
i
z
e
d
gutters. There is a walkout basement with toilet fac
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
T
h
e
u
p
p
e
r
level is entirely open as one roo
m
a
n
d
i
s
f
i
n
i
s
h
e
d
w
i
t
h
a
v
i
n
y
l
a
s
b
e
s
t
o
s
tile floor. The walls and ceilin
g
h
a
v
e
e
x
p
o
s
e
d
s
t
u
d
s
a
n
d
r
a
f
t
e
r
s
.
W
i
r
i
n
g
is in conduit and Greenfield. The
b
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
l
e
v
e
l
i
s
1
0
0
%
e
x
c
a
v
a
t
e
d
a
n
d
finished with men's and women's wa
s
h
r
o
o
m
s
w
i
t
h
s
h
o
w
e
r
,
t
o
i
l
e
t
,
a
n
d
lavatory facilities. There is a Cr
a
n
e
-
L
i
n
e
R
o
y
a
l
5
5
g
a
l
l
o
n
g
a
s
w
a
t
e
r
heater. The building is in fair co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
.
Dimensions: 201' x 18'2' = 490 sq.
f
t
.
Calvin Lodgq .
This is a one story and basement
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
t
w
e
n
t
y
-
f
i
v
e
y
e
a
r
s
old. It has stained siding, Frenc
h
w
i
n
d
o
w
s
,
a
s
p
h
a
l
t
s
h
i
n
g
l
e
r
o
o
f
,
g
a
l
v
a
n
i
z
e
d
gutters ad a walkout basement. T
h
e
u
p
p
e
r
l
e
v
e
l
i
s
e
n
t
i
r
e
l
y
o
p
e
n
,
a
s
a
l
o
d
g
e
room and has a stone fireplace wi
t
h
a
h
e
a
t
o
l
a
t
o
r
.
T
h
e
w
a
l
l
s
a
r
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
e
d
w
i
t
h
knotty pine paneling. The ceilin
g
i
s
o
p
e
n
t
o
t
h
e
r
a
f
t
e
r
s
a
n
d
u
n
f
i
n
i
s
h
e
d
.
T
h
e
wiring is romex. The basement le
v
e
l
i
s
1
0
0
%
e
x
c
a
v
a
t
e
d
a
n
d
f
i
n
i
s
h
e
d
i
n
t
o
m
e
n
'
s
and uomen'!; washrooms with multiple to lavatories and stall showers.
There is an electric water heate
r
.
T
h
i
s
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
i
s
i
n
f
a
i
r
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
.
Dimensions: 32' x 20' 640 sq. ft.
1
cuxSt-SlixocErrcomPANy
WITHERSPOON LODGE
This older one-story building has finished coons on the rear walkout
level. It is approximately thirty years old. It has stained siding,
French windows and asphalt shingle gabled roof. There is a covered open
porch on the front with a full basement beneath it. On the main floor
there are four bedrooms of varying size. The main activity room has a
cathedral beamed, planked ceiling, a large stone fireplace, knotty pine
paneled walls and tile floor. It overlooks the lake. The bedrooms are
finished with plywood walls and ceilings. There are two stairways to
the basement level. The lower level is divided into several areas
including: a small entry porch, kitchen with asphalt tile floor, minimum
cupboards, dishwasher room with plaster walls and ceiling, large dining
hall with stone fireplace, paneled walls and celotex ceiling, bedroom with
paneled walls and celotex ceiling, bedroom with paneled walls, single
sink and adjoining three-fixture bathroom, a furnace room and men's
and women's restrooms. Service equipment includes 2 Armstrong gas forced
air furnaces, a 52 gallon electric water heater, 50 gallon gas water
heater, Wards water softener, and wiring in Greenfield, BR, and conduit.
The main floor is supported by steel beams and posts and 2" x 8" floor
joists, 16" on center. The building is all in poor condition, and has a
great deal of deferred maintenance and deterioration.
Dimensions: 1 story & basement 72' x 20' = 1,440 sq. ft.
1 story & basement 52' x 10' = 520 sq. ft.
1 story-no basement 36' x 12' = 432 sq. ft.
1 story-no basement 13' x 13' = 169 sq. ft.
2,561 sq. ft.
Covered porch & basement 10' x 37' = 370 sq. ft.
Geneva Lodge
This is an old one-story frame building built on stone footings with only
a crawl space. It has a stained exterior with rolled asphalt paper roof.
Across one end is a screened porch. It is approximately fifty years old.
The interior is unfinished with the open studs showing and with no outside
sheathing. The windows are wood hinged and mostly of the pull-up type with
ropes to open. It is divided into a lodge room with brick and stone fire-
place, small storeroom, kitchen area, and another storeroom. Partitions
do not extend to the rafters. The ceiling is all open and unfinished.
The floors ate hardwood. Overall the building is no longer weathertight
due to its age and deteriorated condition. In all, it is in poor
condition.
Dimensions: 46' x 31' = 1,426 sq. ft.
8' x 6' = 48 sq. ft.
12' x 31' = 172 sq. ft.
1,846 sq. ft.
1
1:Al‘o
CHASE -BRACK E 71 COmPANY
Cabins
There are eight individual cabins. They appear to all ha
v
e
b
e
e
n
b
u
i
l
t
about the same time and arc approximately twenty-five years old. One
has been damaged by a storm.
The three gray cabins are situated to utilize the Knox Lo
d
g
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
The five blown cabins use the Calvin Lodge.
The cabins are all basically the same. They have staine
d
c
e
d
a
r
s
i
d
i
n
g
,
asphalt shingle roof, and two entry doors. Inside they
h
a
v
e
h
a
v
e
b
u
i
l
t
-
i
n
lockets and bunks. They have an asphalt tile floor, Fre
n
c
h
w
i
n
d
o
w
s
o
n
the front and 4 small slide-up windows on each end. The
w
a
l
l
s
a
n
d
c
e
i
l
i
n
g
s
are unfinished and show the exposed studs and rafters.
T
h
e
c
a
b
i
n
s
a
r
e
unheated. The wiring is romex. Four of the cabins are bu
i
l
t
o
n
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
slabs. The other 4 have frame floors and are supported ei
t
h
e
r
o
n
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
block or poured concrete pylons. All are in approximately
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
except the one damaged in a storm.
Dimensions of each cabin: 20' x 24' = 480 sq. ft.
GENERAL DATA
Master service equipment includes electricity to each bui
l
d
i
n
g
,
t
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e
,
propane gas, and private sewer and water systems.
The main well supplies Fulton, Witherspoon, Calvin, Knox
a
n
d
G
e
n
e
v
a
L
o
d
g
e
s
.
In the summer this well utilizes the water tower. In the
w
i
n
t
e
r
o
n
l
y
Fulton and Witherspoon Lodges are provided water by mean
s
o
f
a
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
tank in the basement of Fulton Lodge.
Each lodge has its own independent cesspool and drainfiel
d
.
A thorough inspection of the interior of some of the build
i
n
g
s
a
s
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
was not made on March 18, 3980. All of the buildings we
r
e
,
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
t
h
o
r
o
u
g
h
l
y
inspected at a prior time.
CHASE -VRACt.L IT COMPANY
COST APPROACH
Main House
Dimensions:
51' 1.1 28' = 1,428 sq. ft.
Addition 12' x 32' = 384
1,812 sq. ft.
Screen porch: 228 sq. ft.
Deck: 570 sq. ft.
Replacement Cost:
1,812 sq. ft. @ $55.00*
119
Less 10% physical depreciation =
Plus carpeting
Private sewer and water
Indicated Value by the Cost Approach
$99,700
9,700
90,000
3,000
. q021.1
$96,000
*Including porch, deck and patio
Sale ill LOCATION
LEGAL
SELLER
BUYER
DATE OF SALE
ZONING
SIZE
PRICE PER ACRE
COMMENTS
I
3
Sale #2 LOCATION
LEGAL
SELLER
BUYER
DATE OF SALE
ZONING
SIZE
PRICE PER ACRE
COMMENTS
j
Sale #3 LOCATION
1 LEGAL
SELLER
BUYER
DATE OF SALE
ZONING
SIZE
PRICE PER ACRE
COMENTS
CHASE _ .ACYEU CemPANY
MARKET DATA LAND
Lotus Drive, Halstads Bay, Minnetrista
District 36, Plat 40634, Parcels 1025 & 1035
Not known
Not known
1978
R-1
7.6 acres
$17,100
This is a wooded parcel of land with a gentl
e
s
l
o
p
e
to Halstads Bay of Lake Minnetonka. There is
a
p
p
r
o
x
-
imately 315' on the lake.
County Road 44, Halstads Bay, Minnetrista
District 36, Plat 40626, Parcels 1040 & 1060
Freshwater Biological Foundation
Pemtom
1978
R-2
17 acres
$20,588
This is a hilly wooded site with frontage on
H
a
l
s
t
a
d
s
Bay, Lake Minnetonka. Since purchase it has
b
e
e
n
p
l
a
t
t
e
d
into 8 lakeshore.lots, 9 lake access lots an
d
4
o
u
t
l
e
t
s
for private boat slips and roads.
North side of Highway 101 and south shore o
f
L
o
t
u
s
Lake, Chanhassen
Part of SE1/4, Section 24, Township 116N, Rang
e
2
3
1
4
,
Carver County
Char-Lynn Foundation
Bloomberg
1977
R-1A Residential agriculture
23.03 acres
S10,377
This tract of land has 705' of frontage on L
o
t
u
s
L
a
k
e
.
The elevation is 960' near the highway and s
l
o
p
i
n
g
t
o
a lake elevation of 897' which indicates of d
r
o
p
o
f
6
3
'
.
(NA}f.hRA(K[11 COmPANY
MARKET DATA LAND
North side of State Highway #5, west of County Road
4 and south of Round Lake, Eden Prairie
Part of Ell of SW% of Section 8, Township 116, Range 22,
Hennepin County
Not known
Cliff Swendson
1978
Residential 1 and 2 family
27 acres
$9,000
2-4 acres of -the land is low in the center. It is south
of Round Lake but does not have frontage on the lake.
SAle 04 LOCATION
LEGAL
SELLER
BUYER
DATE OF SALE
ZONING
SIZE
%-PR10E PER ACRE
COMMENTS
The sales as shown have been considered in arriving at our
o
p
i
n
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
m
a
r
k
e
t
value of the land for the subject property. Adjustments h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
m
a
d
e
f
o
r
i
t
e
m
s
of variance such AS time, location, desirability of lake, contour, and othe
r
pertinent factors. After careful analysis of each of the
s
e
f
a
c
t
o
r
s
,
i
t
i
s
o
u
r
opinion that the market value of this parcel of land is $
1
5
,
0
0
0
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
.
14.3 acres X $15,000 = $214,500
1
C'4AE_BRACKEfl ((WANT
MARKET APPROACH - HOUSE
1. 11325 Lanewood Circle, Eden Prairie
Sold in August 1979 for $114,500. This house was built in 1975 and has
approxindtely 1,937 sq. ft. of living area, not including the basement
area. There was no finished area in the lower level. The properly Was
well decorated and in very good condition.
2. 8763 Brentwood, Eden Prairie
Sold in September 1979 for $134,500. This rambler was built in 1974 and
contains approximately 23,000 sq. ft. on the first floor. There is a
finished recreation room in the basement walkout level. It has a large
deck.
3. 34220 Crecnview Court, Eden Prairie
Sold in September 1979 for $108,500. This split level home was built in
1975 and contains approximately 1,482 sq. ft. of ground floor living area.
It has a finished recreation room in the basement walkout area.
4. 7429 Tartan Curve Eden Prairie
Sold iu August 1979 for $110,000. This rambler was constructed in 1977 and
contains approximately 1,400 sq. ft. of first floor area. It has finished
area in the lower level.
These sales were homes located on average size lots, all with water and sewer
available and all in Eden Prairie. These have been adjusted to the subject
for variations such as size, date of sale, condition, location and other
refinements. The subject property is located on a large parcel of land. For
the purpose of arriving at an opinion of market value for the house only, we
have deducted the estimated land value for each of. the sales and have arrived
at an opinion of market value of house only. The net adjusted figure for the
house only would indicate a market value of $95,000 by this approach.
CH AC,t1 COHPANY
COMMENTS AND CORRELATIONS
Fulton lodge
Is adjacent to the residence and is the only accessory building that might
add any real value to the overall property. This building has approximately
2,800 sq. ft. of foundation area with 100Z basement and the first floor. This
buildirg is in fair condition. It is conceivable it could be altered for an
accessory use such as a party room with this property, or even moved to a
lakefront location for remodeling into a one family house, or remodeled for
another nee. We are assigning it an arbitrary value of $10,000 for the
purpose of this appraisal.
Miscellaneous Buildings
All ;of the other buildings, which include 8 cabins (one of which has been
heavily damaged), double garage, and Calvin and Knox Lodges, have only token
value. Witherspoon and Geneva Lodge are considered to have no value. They
are both obsolete and should be razed. All of the miscellaneous buildings
we are assigning a value of $5,000.
Conclusion
This parcel including the present buildings and 14.3 acres is obviously obsolete
as a camp property which was the use approximately 10 years ago. Therefore, the
property could either be developed as three residential homesites or overall as
a county estate, as it is presently being used, or some variation of these two
possibilities.
The residence is in excellent condition and has had major remodeling. The
market value analysis indicated a value of $95,000, not including land.
The other buildings have token value only for resale and moving them off the
lake cabins. The Knox or Calvin Lodge could conceivably be a guest house with
this property. The other buildings could best be removed. The garage has some
value even though it is not accessible to the house. Actually a new garage
should be added adjacent to the house.
It is our opinion that the highest and best use would be to divide the site
into 3 parcels and sell two of the sites for construction of additional home-
sites. The main house, Fulton Lodge, and perhaps some of the other buildings
could be utilized with one or more of the sites.
We are aware that the City of Eden Prairie does require a 5 acre tract for con-
struction of homes when there is no water or sewer available. The subject site
of 14.3 acres would according to this regulation only be two sites. In view of
the fact that it is so close to 15 acres, we have assumed that a variance could
be obtained for dividing into 3 sites.
It is, therefore, our opinion that the present market value is as follows.
Mouse $ 95,000
Auxiliary buildings
15,000
Land
363
214 500
Estimated Market Value
$324,500
S
L A
R I I
4,1•
MIMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
May 15, 1980
Round Lake Park Plan
When the City Council decided to locate the Community Center on City park
property north of Valley View Road, the Round Lake Park Plan had to he
revised. Several months ago, the School Board commissioned Mr. Ray Keller
to complete a master plan for the school site located north of Round Lake
Park. City staff have been in touch with Mr. Keller and the school
administration regarding revisions of Round Lake Park Plan north of Valley
View Road and the school site master plan. Staff has delayed a recommendation
to the Council on a revision of the Round Lake Park Plan to insure that
the park plan worked well with the school master plan for the adjacent
property.
At the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission May 19 meeting and
the May 20 City Council meeting staff will present the proposed revisions
to the Round Lake Park Plan. Hopefully, at this time we will also have
a copy of the approved school site master plan.
BL:md
10:
TURD:
FROM
DATE:
StKILLT:
Myor I'd City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural 1(e1ources Cont.itission
RogL ,r h. Ul!.t.od, City Hanager
L:01.ort, Pirector of Cori:nullity Services CAL_
May 1S, 19:10
Creekwood Park Acquisition
in March of M'.0, the City Council atithoTized staff to n e .gotia; f or th e
acquisitdia of park sites for the Midden Ponds, Red Rock and Cl't.e:wriod
areas. Thu Creekrood site was proposed to be i.rule pp of two parcels, a
tyrrcei nerall) south of ihu creek owned by the Preserve and a parcel
of the crook owned by ;4r. L. 2. DeLecoor. The majority
of thy develupiownt would occur north of the creek on Hr. DeLecour's
prepolly. Staff had desifmatcd approximately 9.53 acres of Mr. OLLecour's
prop:rt.) plofosed park site.
On May 13, 1950, staff act with Mr. DeLecoor to discuss acquisition of the
site. Tho appraial complet:'.1 by Sr. trillia”.1 Chase appraised the parcel
St .$2,500/acre. nowevcr, the appraisal contained a major error sfating
that pi:blic sewer vas approximately one quarter of a mile away 11e!.1
ProPerty, wilco in fact public sewer runs through this pareel. Nr. F-Lecour
indicated that he would not. be intorested in selling the property lint, the
City too!: the entire parcel which includes approximately an :dditiont
acres. In% DeLecet.r also indicated that he felt that 'the market value of
that property is closer to :::1,009/;.cre than $2,500/acre. Mr. DeLoeonr
sites an appraisal completed by Robert P. Mabsser of Auttst 11, 1971 tha1
I ISIS sales of property in that area from 1067-1971 that raw from $2,1 -.tql/acre
to $4,:S0/acre. lhe majority of the sales at around $3,500/ acre in 1970.
Sr. DoLocour also sites the fact that the property just north of Sunnyb:oci.
Road, which contains a large undevelopable swamp, sold for $4,000/acri• three
years ago.
Sr. DeLecour would agree to selling his approxirtate 12.6 acres for $4,090lacre
fora total of $S0,400. This property would inc.linle approximately SSO feet
of tin' proposed lhnoeward Hills Road right-of-way.
At this 1 1140, staff reco‘Irmads the Connell consider aciinisit 01 ii th: D ,..1.ccour
property. Also, to III) 1,11:1' staff to nogotiato a Iii 014(0 4
3 rortioll ol I ho PFC:...C.,Vk' property tliat wonld connect 111,‘
01! 101 A or the Creek...nod devolopent. Ftivtlierigooe. staff would r ,..c,rir.tend
r„rading a:1,1 thiti 11:11k 1 0,1 n 15 S00:1 I!) itcr .161n
(Loperully in 19S01 And d,velopmcnt of n trail conv.o,lin ,,,. CE,chwood develop-
ment via a bridge 01,0111 I'. Purgatory Creek. park would oot .'11 10
the (r:el.wood area and I i' funiro (1.,1 1c,1) 1111-K 11,0.y i 541 .444.1
CcontY MIA 1. hut 0,00111 sorve !q0:111': :1;1 ,1 Co.
r1,•,,d ow i),..vmoin,tont 111:11 III 1)11)1 wo,1 lav.. 1 11 1079. Still 1,01111 "'"
lily properly 1w1w1,:in,.. to III:, rit.-4.rvt. at th:s limo, On I',',' I' lbc
until thdt proper!). is developed JTJ 30111)1V. IlCi4ti!.lry
porl, pl.000rty crect parl, tacl:,-.1 1.‘
-2-
this revert indieat(%; the DeLecour property, a posnible future acquisition
of rreservo property, the propor.ed trail acee connecting Creel:wood and
the propu:.ed future aligament of Homvard flint -. Road.
PL:wd
130
\'; ottpr:r
• \ .
, \\\
MEMO
TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager
FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer
DATE: May 16, 1980
SUBJECT: Bids for Cardinal Creek Estates 2nd Add.
I.C. 51-376
Sealed bids were opened at 10:00 A.M. on Friday, May 16, 1980, for
street and utility improvements in Cardinal Creek Estates 2nd Addition.
The attached summary lists the bids as received and the apparent low
bidder is
Brown & Cris
In the Amount Of $156,521.66
All bids will be checked for errors and-a final bid summary and award
recommendation will be given to the Council on Tues. evening.
CJJ:kh
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CARDINAL CRFEK 2ND ADDITION
BID OPENING: MAY 16, 1980
10:00 A.M.
BIDDER BID SECAJRITY TOTAL BID
C. S. McCrossan
Barb3rossa & Sons, Inc. 4j,--''X i -11 -
is Nodland Associates, Inc. -,-;%,
Northern Contracting, Inc.
Progressive Contractors, Inc.
,
A. C. G. Mechanical --
y Brown & Cris, Inc. `7)-7,
Minnesota Valley Surfacing —
.\ G. L. Contracting
-70
S-7
I7q,
i -ia , ;-),0 -7 -7 :-,--- y, Mennen Construction Co.
Julian Johnson Construction
Thomas Montgomery Construction
0 8, P Contracting
ORS Construction ,- ,.,
:.7- ien 2 3 27, 2.`",-
/7'.7,- ,2--) (-)':----
Northdale Construct:on Co.
_... e-/ 7, c..
• A Richard Knutson, Inc.
Bury & Carlson
K Orfei & Sons, In_c.
_ •Se, • i c- c'
Parrott Construction ,n --- 0-,-, •:,:' ..
,c C. W. Houle
t>
,
. ---
- _: 1 -3. f• :"..,
,c Wal hunt Construction
C. Wayne Erickson Construction
X --
-
/&(0);73 -2. 3j
Deluxe Construction
Ideal Enterprises, Inc. \
Alexander Construction Co.
i,,' Randall Contracting, Inc.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R80-93
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PERMIT APPLICATION
WHEREAS, the proposed sanitary sewer to be constructed
Cardinal Creek 2nd Addition requires a connection to the Pktro-
politan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) interceptor system; and
WHEREAS, the proposed connection conforms to the Eden
Prairie Comprehensive Sewer Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City
Council as follows:
The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed
to submit an application for "Permit for Connection
to or Use of Commission Facilities" to the MWCC.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON
Wolfgang Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Cie-ac
0-15
May 20, 1980
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. R80- 94
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND
SPDCIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVER-
TISEMENT FOR BIDS (I.C. 51-325 II)
WHEREAS, the City Engineer, through Rieke Carroll Muller, Assoc.,
has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvement, to wit,
I.C. 51-32S, Phase II, improvements on Valley
View Rd. and Dell Rd.
and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
I. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the
official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an adver-
tisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under
such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement
shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be
done, shall state that bids will be opened at 10:00 o'clock
A.M. on Thursday, July 10, 1980, and considered by the Coun-
cil at 7:30 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday, July 15, 1980, in the Council
Chambers of the City Hall and that no bids will be considered
unless accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond
or certified check payable to the City for 5% (percent) of
the amount of such bid.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
ATTEST:
cafgang H. Penzel, Mayor
SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
May 20, 1980
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO R80-9 5
RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT,
CALLING FOR A HEARING AND ORDERING
PREPARATION OF PLANS (LC. 51-341)
• WHEREAS, a report has been given by the City Engineer to the
City Council on May 20, 1980, recommending the following improvements
to wit:
I.C. 51-332, Street and walkway improvements
on Anderson Lakes Parkway from Preserve Blvd.
to T.H. 169.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements in
accordance with the report and the assessment of property
abutting or within said boundaries for all or a portion of
the cost of the improveaent pursuant to M.S.A. Sect.
420.011 to 429.111, at an estimated total cost of the
improvements as shown.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement
on the 17th day of June, 1980, 4t 7:30 P.M. at the Eden Prairie
City Hall. The City Clerk shall give published and mailed
notice of such hearing on the improvements as required by law.
3. The City Engineer, through BRW, Inc., shall prepare plans
and specs for such improvements.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, C-TeA
IV3
MEMO
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJTCT:
Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council
Roger Ulstad, City Manager
Carl Jullie, City Engineer
May 15, 1980
Edenbrook Development and Dell Road
north of Duck Lake Trail
The landowners of the Edenbrook Devlopment north of Duck Lake Trail and
Dell Road have decided to drop their current zoning of RM 5.5 and apply
for rezoning to R1 13.5 single family residential.
Over the past several months we have been meeting with the owners in an
attempt to secure a realignment of Dell Road in order to avoid an area of
poor soils. We worked up some possible single family layouts of their
property which would fit in with the proposed Dell Road alignment shift.
The City's contractor for the Dell Road project is prepared to resume
work in the near future and it is important not to delay him any more
than necessary. The owners are prepared to grant the easement required,
but they wish to secure the right to request compensation in the event
that the revised plan would be rejected.
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the staff to accept an
easement for the revised alignment of Dell Road and proceed with con-
struction with the understanding that compensation for the new right-of-way
may be necessary in the event that the City does not approve the owners'
new site plan.
The Planning Commission has been advised of the owners' intent to apply
for rezoning and the Commission members have indicated a positive response,
but Tuesday evening we will have a drawing available showning the proposed
single family plots.
CJJ:kh
isVe
MICHAEL .1. ADAMS
OHECIORY D. OPST.M ,SON
MARK 0. OHNSTAD
STANLEY C. OLSEN. JR.
THOMAS I. MAMA
J0115 H. I1UJAN
.10115 E. YUKIO:LICH
RONALD L. SNELLINO
JAMES D. ATKINSON.I11
JOHN D. POVOLNY
JOSEPH .1. CHRISTENSEN
GUSTAFSON & ADAMS. P. A.
ATTORNEYS AT IAW
SUITE 411
7400 METRO BOULEVARD
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55444
TELEPHONE 101/D 036-7E77
May 15, 1980
Or COUNSEL
1141111V IR 'STAENON
Mr. Carl Jullie
City Engineer
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
RE: Dell Road Relocation - Catco Property
Dear Carl:
As we have discussed over the past several months, Catco,
Inc. has reacquired the property adjacent to proposed Dell Road
from the Pautz', said property having been sold on a contract to
the Pautz' in 1973. Catco, Inc. has had no role in the proposed
development plans for the subject property until the last few
months. You have been most helpful in bringing us up to speed
with respect to the status of the property and the engineering
problems faced by the City with respect to Dell Road.
You have asked us to consider a proposed relocation of Dell
Road approximately 150 feet to the west of its present location
due to the extreme adverse soil conditions which were encountered
during construction last year. I represent Catco, Inc. and in
that capacity have suggested to you that my clients wish to
cooperate in every way with the City in this request and are
looking favorably upon a replatting and rezoning of the subject
property to a single-family development.
In this regard, you asked BP:N.Yo prepare a rough schematic
of a proposed single-family layout within the Catco property
after giving effect to the necessary relocation of Dell Road.
Catco, Inc. will consent to an immediate relocation of Dell Road
as per your request in consideration of City approval of the
following general parameters for a single-family development:
Mr. Carl Jullie
Page Two
May 15, 1980
1. Catco, Inc. will make a park dedication of all land
lying to the east of relocated Dell Road with the
singular exception of the "knoll" which will be
developed into single-family home sites as indicated
on the attached rough proposed plat. The knoll is
existing high ground and its development will in no
way require interference with the flood plain.
2. The single-family development will include development
of the 400 foot setback previously established as a
buffer between the existing single-family homes located
to the west of the property and the proposed multiple-
family project.
3. Catco, Inc. will agree to handle special assessments in
the manner set forth in paragraph 4 of the Development
Agreement dated April 6, 1978, executed by the City of
Eden Prairie and Eden Prairie Townhouse Company. Included
in said paragraph 4 is the agreement that:
"All special assessments, including Dell Road,
and currently levied trunk sewer and water assess-
ments, on the 118.17 acre Edengate site as shown
on Exhibit C shall be spread equally over the 176
platted lots, and paid only on a per unit basis at
time of final closing of the sale of each unit;
provided, however, amounts paid towards the assess-
ments hereunder shall be at least equal to the normal
amortized annual payment of principal and interest
of such assessments. The parties agree that the
above-described special assessment for the construc-
tion of Dell Road and the trailway shall be spread
over a five-year period."
Despite said language, the special assessments have
already been levied on the property and penalties and
interest are presently accruing thereon. It is the
request of Catco, Inc. that all said special assessments,
together with accrued penalties and interest, be
"cancelled" and that the special assessments be sub-
sequently levied in a manner consistent with the fore-
going provision contained in paragraph 5 of the Development
Agreement. Catco, Inc. will execute whatever documents
137
Mr. Carl Jullie
Page Three
May 15, 1980
the City deems necessary to insure compliance with
this undertaking.
4. It is the intention of Catco, Inc. to comply with all
provisions of said Development Agreement except as
specifically noted to the contrary in this letter
and except as any such provisions are inconsistent
with a single-family development.
5. The attached proposed plat was prepared by BRW at your
request to serve merely as a starting point for our
discussions. The actual number, dimensions and loca-
tions of any lots and/or roads will be as mutually
agreed upon by our land architect (who has not yet
been involved in this process) and City staff, We
will want to give consideration to questions of
topography and the other normal factors which must
be considered in a project of this nature.
Very truly yours,
GDG:sn
Enclosure
cc: Catco, Inc.
1174C.
MEMO
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor Fenzel and Members of theCity Coun
c
i
l
Roger Ulstad, City Manager
Carl Jullie, City Engineer
May 15, 1980
Future Middle School Access to Co. R.d 4
At your meeting on May 6, the Council re
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
t
h
e
s
t
a
f
f
t
o
r
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
respond to a letter of May 6, 1980, from
t
h
e
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
S
u
p
e
r
-
intendent, regarding access to Co. Rd. 4
f
o
r
a
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
m
i
d
d
l
e
school at the east end of the Round Lake
s
i
t
e
.
It is our recommendation that the best acc
e
s
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
s
o
m
e
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
to Valley Vier Rd. so as to utilize this
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
t
Valley View Rd./Co. Rd. 4. However, this
a
p
p
a
r
e
n
t
l
y
w
o
u
l
d
n
o
t
b
e
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
at this point because of the requirement
t
h
a
t
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
a
t
h
l
e
t
i
c
f
i
e
l
d
s
adjacent to the high school and future mi
d
d
l
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
c
a
n
n
o
t
b
e
s
e
v
e
r
e
d
by roads or driveways. The next best opti
o
n
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
n
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
with Co. Rd. 4 at the present South Hillc
r
e
s
t
C
o
u
r
t
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
T
h
e
new North Hillcrest Court Road leading we
s
t
o
f
C
o
.
R
d
.
4
i
n
t
o
D
u
c
k
L
a
k
e
Vista could also be used, but this is not
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
t
h
e
r
e
w
i
l
l
be concentrated school traffic using a re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
,
w
h
i
c
h
s
h
o
u
l
d
be avoided if possible.
With the Council's concurrence we will fo
r
w
a
r
d
o
u
r
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
School District.
CJJ:kh
Attachment
F3'17
5 0 TIM I FlI•••n0n404, n. onnr•-•0.0n•••••..
3
-*SO SME/RC LANK
4_,C4HK 3IEW LAN E
A:1
MEMO
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor Fenzel and Members of the City Council
Roger Ulstad, City Manager
Carl Jullie, City Engineer
May 15, 1980
Street Name Changes
Bluffs Blvd., Bluff Rd., Homeward Hills Road
At your meeting on May 5, 1980, the Council requested the staff t
o
r
e
v
i
e
w
a possible change "Bluffs Blvd." because of its similarity with
"
B
l
u
f
f
Rd." and the potential confusion during emergency calls.
Upon our review we recommend the following:
1. Retain the name "Bluffs Blvd." and designate this name to extend
from Riverview Rd. to Anderson Lakes Parkway.
2. Remove the name "Homeward Hills Rd." from its present alignment
and reassign this name to the east-west road through Bluffs West
2nd and 3rd Additions.
3. Change the name "Bluff Rd." to "Franlo Road."
Presently, there are seven residences along Bluff Rd. which would
b
e
affected by this name change. If Bluffs Blvd. were to be changed,
a
total of 47 residences would be involVed, plus changing about'fift
e
e
n
street signs.
The Public Safety Department has reviewed the proposed changes and
c
o
n
c
u
r
s
per the attached memo.
CJJ:kh
Attachments
13-)1
May 14, 1980
TO: Carl Jullie
FROM: Keith Wall, Department of Public Safety
A/LJ
We have reviewed the Engineering Department's proposal to change
the name of Bluff Road to Franlo Road. This change will reduce
the possibility of confusion for Public Safety personnel respond-
ing to emergency calls from homes in the area.
We would also recommend that separate names for cul-de-sacs be kept
to a minimum if house numbers can maintain reasonable continuity.
1 3i 0
0 1 r---EliN ) 1 7:; n ''' - .
'.` /
(....__•-• Lt .
\, -,./ - —, •,0 ""-Y IS
re',1 n(...
::........N. ...7.1.,
....
__. .4,,,,2 • , ,....,_ r._,-".?:,
------,-,4 , ,,-,/./.....
i:FORESr VIEW CiRCL IC —1 ,..6,3 1:____ , . cli..._,..?:,:,., / ii
if (7A-kitiCL .., ../ : iwocKALL-ot • 4- LAKE FALL DR,VE
et ..--.1
7 tr—IP
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John Franc
DATE: May 16, 1980
RE: A resolution activating an H.R.A. in the City.
The information you requested on the H.R.A. resolution was not available
in time to include with your packet. It will be available at the Council
meeting on the 20th of May.
/3-a
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John D. Frane, City Clerk
DATE: May 15, 1980
A Housing and Redevelopment Authority exists in every City in the
state according to state statutes. In order for the HRA to function
It needs to be activated by the governing body of the municipality
and members appointed to serve on its board.
The Council appoints the HRA Board members, reappoints members
whose terms have expired and can remove members after a hearing.
Any citizen of Eden Prairie can be appointed. One or more members
of this Council can be appointed.
The HRA once activated has, as far as I can tell, all the powers .
of a City except Public Safety and law making. It can for in-
stance buy and sell real and personal property, enter into contracts,
borrow money, employ legal council and staff. •
The actions of the HRA can be monitored should the Council choose
not to appoint itself as the HRA by requiring council ratification
of certain HRA actions.
JDF:hw
5/15/80
To: Mayor and Cwncil
From: John Franc
Date: May 16, 19SO
Re: Insurance proposals
The following proposals were received:
WorLmans Compensation
General Liability
Building
Auto
Contractors Equipment
Subtotal •
Public Officials
Unbrel1a
Boiler & Machinery
ab.
M.E. Lane
New Horizon
Agency .1.9S2T191
93,481
93,481
19,563
19,416
6,233
6,583
16,711 *
16,947
1,896
* • 956
137,884
137,383
2,446
2,341
10,094
4,000
1,133
502
The proposal of the H. F. Lane Agency will use the Home Insuranc
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
as
the carrier on the first five coverages. The Home has a divide
n
d
p
l
a
n
b
a
s
e
d
on the total losses on all coverages. The proposal of New Hori
z
o
n
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
s
a dividend plan only on Workman's compensation.
Using estimate of losses the following should give us an idea o
f
w
h
a
t
t
h
e
net cost of the first five coverages would be.
Premium Dividend
Net Cost
Home - 45% loss ratio overall 137,884 18,890
118,994
New Horizon 27.5% loss on 137,383 4,674
132,709
workman's compensation only
The Council could consider awarding the first five items to the M
.
E
.
L
a
n
e
Agency and the balance of the covey-age to the New Horizon Agency.
*The proposal for auto coverage was originally at $21,736. The i
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
reviewed this figure and dicovered an error. The net cost of the
H
o
m
e
p
a
c
k
a
g
e
using the original amount would have been $123,330.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL
6 4q
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 80-91
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
SERVICES CONTRACT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY.
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, County
of Hennepin, that the City Manager and City Clerk be authorized to sign
the 1980 contract with Hennepin County in the amount of $2,440.00 for
the provision of Environmental Health Services by the City of Eden Prairie.
ADOPTED by the City Council this 20th day of May, 1980.
Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor
SEPTEMBER 1979
MAY 1980
CAMERA OPERATOR'S CERTIFICATE
I hereby certify that the microphotographs appearing on this roll of film are true,
accurate, and complete copies of the original records described below.
Reproductions intended to serve as permanent records comply with standards
established by the Minnesota Historical Society.
AGENCY OF ORIGIN:
RECORD SERIES:
INCLUSIVE DATES/NOS:
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
COUNCIL PACKETS
JANUARY 1977 - DECEMBER 1991
DATE
5
BEGINS WITH:
ENDS WITH:
2/2/94
CMI
CONCEPT MICRO IMAGING MINNETONKA. MN
PRODUCING LABORATORY CITY/STATE