Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 04/01/1980 JOHN D. FRANE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL • ( 'UESDAY, APRIL 1, 1980 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayer Wolfgang Penzel, Dean Edstrom, Dave `! Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and Paul Redpath COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney Roger Pauly; Planning Director Chris Enger; Finance Director John Frane; Director of Community Services Bob Lambert; Engineer Carl Jullie, and Jzyce Provo, Recording Secretary INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS BF BUSINESS II. MINUTES A. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 4, 1980 Page 912 B. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 18, 198C Page 922 III. CONSENT CALENEAF A. Clerk's License List Page 933 ( B. Approve plans and s ecificaticns and order bids for improvements in Page 934 Duck Lake Estates I.C. 51-367 , Alpine Estates 2nd (I.C. 51-3727, and Village Woods II I.C. 51-362 Resolution No. 8©- C. Resolution for T.H. 169 right-of-way dedication for permanent Page 935 signal project at Co. Rd. 1 (Resolution No. 80-74) D. Set Public Hearing for Rymarland Camp 2nd Addition for May 6, 1980 Page 539 E. Set Public Hearing for Cardarelle & Associates, Inc. Office for Page 940 May 6, 1980 F. Request to reschedule Public Hearing for Minnesota Vikings for Page 941 • Municipal Industrial Development Bond approval in the amount of $6,000,000.00 from April 15, 1980 to May 6, 1980 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS J' A. Viking Office & Training Facility by Condon/Naegele Realty Co. Request Pane 942 for PUD Concept approval for Office/Industrial uses on 73 acres and PUD Develrent stage approval, rezoning from Rural & I-2 Park to Office for 15 acres, and preliminary plat approval (Resolutiori-No. 80-64-PUb;Ordinance No. 80-69 - rezoning; and Resolution No. 80-65 - preliminary plat) B. Tudor Oaks by ABTO Holdings - Mn.,Tnc. Development stage approval Pane 962 of the POD to toto include prcliminary_plutting of 4Tres into 3fots a 2 outlots. (Resolution No. 80-66 C. Watermain, street and storm drainage improvements on W. 74th Street, Page 573 Norseman Industrial Park, I.C. 51-359 (Resolution No. $O1-69) Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,Apri1 1, 1980 D.`y"Vacation of excess right-of-way along W. 78th Street abutting Page 976 Rosemount, Inc., property (Resolution No. 80-70) E��Vacation of drainage and utility easements along lot lines, Garrison Page 979 Forest 2nd Addition (Resolution No. 80-71) *PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 1001 - 1139 Page 982 VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS fir no--* /"Aar a r�A VII. APPOINTMENTS A. Appointment of 1 member to the Minnetonka Community Services Advisory Commission VIII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A.''esolution No. 80-75, supporting approval of the Hennepin County F.A.U.Page 986 proj project submittals for projects within the City of Eden Prairie for 1981 through 1983 BOResolution No. 80-67, approving the preliminary plat of Garrison Page 9B8 Forest 4th Addition { IaApprove plans and specifications for traffic signal and road Pane 1003 improvements at Co. Rd. lB/Anderson Lakes Parkway, I. C. 51-338 (Resolution No. 80-73) IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members B. Report of City Attorney C. Report of City Manager D. Report of Director of Community Services ,,.YCreekwood Park (continued from March 18, 1980) Page 1006 Community Center Site Page 1008 3. Homeward Hills Park Grading/Ownership (24-,- Page 1010 Award Bids for Construction Equipment Lease Page 1011 !1J(5. M.A.C. Lease for Flying Cloud Ballfield Expansion Page 1012 6. Flying Cloud and Staring Lake Park Bids tie r 7. Report on Restoration Study of Grill House - Foster Dunwiddie Page 1015 B. Hidden Ponds Park negotiations Page 1036 E. Report of Finance Director r.� w D 1� Request by Eden Hills Company for an additional extension of the time Page 1038 requirement for final approval for M.I.D.B.'s (continued from 12/18/79) X. NEW BUSINESS XI. ADAOHRNMFNI. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE C1TY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MARCH 4, 1980 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Fenzel, Dean Edstrom, Dave Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and Paul Redpath COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roger Ulstad; City Attorney R:ger Pauly; Director of Community Services Bcb Lambert; Planning Director Chris Enger; Finance Director John Frane; City Engineer Carl Jullie; and Donna Stanley, Recording Secretary INVOCATION: City Manager Roger Ulatad PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: All members present. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following items.were moved from the Regular Agenda to the Consent Calendar: VIII. A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. e0-05. licensing and regulating the use and sale of intoxicating liquor and amending Ordinance No. 2u2, as amended by Ordinances Nos. 320 and 7u,-46; :. es. No. c..-55, ( continuing Eden Prairie's participation under the new LEA Legislation as a Joint Hennepin County, City of Minneapolis and Sub. Unit of Gov. combin- ation entitlement •urisdication; C. Resolution No. tic,-45. granting final approvi..1 for i•iunicipal led. Bev. Londs in the amount of $1,4CC,CCC.Cii for Suburban Associates; A. D.1. Bequest permission to aavertise and re- ceive bids for grading at Staring Lake iark and Flying Cloud ballfields; 3. Award Tractor bids; 4. Janke property purchase-Anderson Lakes; n.l. Res. No. 8%-52, ordering improvements on Valley View hoax, Hermes nay and Dell Aid., I.C. 51-325; 3. Res. No, CC-55, oraering of feasibility report for im:rove- meets on Anderson Lakes ea.rkway from ereserve Boulevard to lake Eden i,orth Ai.lition,I.C. 51-341; 4. Change Order No. 2, Shady Oak Road improvements, T.C. 51-344A, for additional swamp mucking and time extension Edstrom requested the addition of the following items under NEW BUSINESS: A. Illegal house on County Rd. 1; B. Communication regarding unleashed dogs in the Coach Light Manor neighborhood. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the agenda as amended and published. Motion carried unaiimously. • II. MINUTES OF THE JOINT CITY. COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MONDAY, JANUAuY 21, 19;,., • Pg. 1, add"City Attorney Roger Pauly"to"CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT" " 2, Para.12, let sent., delete "would"; add "may". MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the minutes of the Joint City Council/Planning Commission held Monday, January 21, 1980, as amended and published. Motion carried 4-0-1, Pauly abstaining. 9t� • • Council Minutes - 2 - March 4, 1980 B. MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, FEB. 5, 1980 MOTIONs Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday. Feb. 5, 1980 as published. Motion carried unanimously. C. MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 1980 MOTIONS Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, Feb.19, 1980 as published. Motion carried, Redpath and Pauly abstaining. • III. CONSENT CALENDAR • A. Clerk's License List B. Set Public Hearing for CNR East PUD & Viking Rezoning for April 1, 19d0 C. Set Public Hearing for Tudor Oaks for development stage approval and preliminary plat for April 1, 1930 D. Set Public Hearing for Minnesota Vikings request for Municipal Industrial Development Bond approval in the amount of $6,OOO,000.00 for April 1. 1930 E. Authorization for Year VI Community Development Block Grant Application F. Receive lOO petition and order improvements for Alpine Estates 2nd Addition, 1.C. 51 372 (Resolution No. 30-47) G. Receive 100% petitior_and order improvements for Cardinal Creek 2nd Addition, 1.C. 51 376 (Resolution No. 8u-40; H. Receive 100j petition and order improvements for'Meadow Park Addition and Homeward Hills load, 1.C. 51-360 (Resolution No. 3C-49) I. Receive petition from Rosemount, Inc. and set hearing date for vacation of excess right-of-way along il. 73th street for April 1, 1930 (Resolution No. 30-50) J. Receive petition from The Preserve and set hearing date for Vacation of drainage and utility easement in Garrison Forest 2nd Addition for April 1, 19dt, (Resolution No. dC-51) K. Granting of eighteen-month extension on Master's Condomiums developer's agreement L. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 30-05, licensing and regulating the use and sale of intoxicating liquor and amending Ordinance No. 2u2, as amended by Ordinances Nos. 32„ and 73-46 M. Resolution No, &-56, continuing Eden Prairie's participation under the .ew LEA Legislation as a Joint Hennepin County, City of Minneapolis and ;suburban Unit of Government combination entitlement .;uri::dication N. Resolution No. 80-45, granting final approval for Municipal Industrial development Bonds in the amount of 41,400' for ;suburban Associates c11? Council Minutes - 3 - March 4, 1980 • 0. Request permission to advertise and receive bids for grading at Staring Lake Park and Flying Cloud ballfields P. Award tractor bids ( Q. Janke property purchase - Anderson Lakes R. Resolution No. 80-52,ordering improvements on Valley View Roads Names day and Dell Road, 1.C. 51-325 S. Resolution No. 80-55, ordering of feasibility report for improvements on Anderson Lakes Parkway from Preserve Boulevard to Lake :akin North Addition, 1.C. 51-341 T. Change Order No. 2, Shady Oak Road improvements, I.C. 51-344A, for additional swamp mucking and time extension MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt to approve the Consent Calendar as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Opus Plaza Office Building by Rauenhorst Corporation. Request for PUD Development Stage approval and rezoning from Rural to Office. Located west of Co. Rd. 18 and north of Crosstown 62. (Ordinance No. 80-06) City Manager Roger Ulstad spoke to notification of all adjacent property owners and publication of all legal notices. The proponents have appeared before the • Planning Commission and their recommendation is for the Council to consider approval of the zoning request from Rural to Office. Mr. Robert Worthington. Director-Planning and Governmental Affairs, Rauenhorst Corporation, presented a summary of the plans for the construction of a ten- story (120') high office building overlooking the pond located on the site, explaining that the pond is and will remain a prominent feature of the site. He pointed out that the building will become the new headquarters loca- tion for their corporation and that the final product will be a fine structure of which Rauenhorst will take great pride in. He referred to the Staff Report and Planning Commission recommendations, noting the parking requirements from which Rauenhorst is request4 variances. Mr. Ron Auerbach, Engineer representing Rauenhorst Corp., outlined the steps Rauenhorst Corp. followed in developing the plans for the site, noting that the wooded hillside was also considered an amenity and would be protected. Four of the ten floors would be used by the Rauenhorst Corporation, with the upper six floors for tenant use. He spoke to vehicular traffic plans for Blue Circle Drive • and the two way system for the parking ramp, and also explained the proposed land- scaping.soreening, and energy saving plans for the site. I Auerbach spoke further to the Planning Commission Minutes and to their letter of response to the Planning Commission recommendations, in which they explained that approval has been given by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, and they have met with a representative of the City Building Department f.nd received preliminary approval of the plans and are following up with a second meeting. He spoke to the fire truck access to the building through the lane located on the south side of • the building so that water could be accessible to that side of the building, and also to plans for a second fire hydrant to be located for use to the north side of the building. They feel that the parking plans they have proposed will be adequate, and referred to the communication dated March 3, 1980 on that matter. • Council Minutes - 4' March 4, 1980 A. Opus Plaza Office Building by Rauenhorst Corporation (continued) • Mr. Sheldon Johnson, Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., discussed the results of their review of certain transportation and parking aspects of the proposed building. They feel the present design is more than sufficient to accommodate compact and sub-compact autos and is consistent with standard practice for de- sign of parking stalls, and that the number of compact spaces proposed is reasonable, according to research done by C.W. Blum, Jr. and P.4. Miller of T & M Associates in November of 1979. Johnson explained further that there is a potential problem for a "hook and ladder" type vehicle for turning purposes, and have suggested review with the Department of Public Safety for an adegaate solution. He explained further their recommendation that the east-west access roadway be constructed to a width of 23 feet and the use of a triangular intersection, with the one-way legs, allows that entering/exiting traffic conflicts will not occur on Blue Circle Drive. Planning Director Chris Enger summarized the concerns of the Planning Commission, emphasizing the recommendation for minimum disruption to the site during construction. Additional concerns were the 100A use of buildable site and the amount of parking spaces, and Enger further emphasized that it has been the City's experience that the required parking spaces were necessary, noting the parking problems faced by Gelco and the American Family Insurance Co. and their need to add on parking facili- ties, even though their plans did meet the parking ordinance requirements. Pauly questioned whether the Staff report recommendations have been met. Enger responded that no. 7 requesting detailed gradins and screening plans has not yet been submitted, and it has been suggested that a 3 level parking ramp be used. Worthington responded to concerns expressed by Enger, explaining they do have a back up plan if there is a need for more parking. He spoke to a new MTC "ride a van" program which their employees will be able to use and which they feel every industrial park will be using in the future. The 3 level parking ramp suggested would not be feasible because of prohibitive costs; the plan would lend more pro- minence to the ramp than they cared for; and there would not be any assurance it would not cause overflow and drainage problems. Edstrom questioned Johnson further on the transportation study data referred to in the Numo of March 3, and whether he felt this plan would be adequate if there was no public transportation available. Johnson responded affirmative. Director of Community Services, Robert Lambert, spoke to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission motion of approval of the proposal per the staff recommendations. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to close the Public Hearing and give a lst Reading to Ordinance No. 80-06d for POD Development Stage approval and rezoning from Rural to Office. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to direct Staff to draft a developer's • agreement incorporating the recommendations of the Planning Commission, the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission, and Staff Report of January 10, 1930, with the stipulation that the parkingand public safety concerns be worked out prior to the 2na Reading. Motion carried unanimously. • 915 Council Minutes - 5- March 4,"1980 B. CABLE TV - Invitations for Applications (Res. 80- 4) Ulstad explained that State law requires that the city hold a public hearing prior to the extention of the invitations to those interested in providing the service of cable TV. Ms. Anita Benda, Southwest :ATV Commission, explained the purpose of the public hearing to be held to adopt the "invitation of Appli- cations". She spoke to the "Preliminary Franchise Ordinance" and ". "Joint Powers Agreement", summarizing the procedure to be followed by the applicants and priorities that will be given to the applicants that will provide certain services. Benda clarified, in response to a question by Edstrom, that the Reso- lution acted upon tonight would approve the distribution of documents and not the "Preliminary Franchise Ordinance", in order to give the applicants some knowledge of the ground rules. Mayor Penzel questioned the contradiction in the amount of franchise fees contained throughout the documents. Benda explained the 5,8 fees need approval of the Federal Communications Commission, whereas the 3% fees do not. There is presently a bill in a Senate committee that would eliminate this F.C.C. rule. MOTIONS Pauly moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing on CABLE TV and approve Resolution No. 8O-i4, Invitations for Applications. rr Motion carried unanimously. l_ V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 7589; - 7750 MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Penzel, to approve the Payment of Claims Nos. 7539 - 7750. iioll Call Votes Edstrom, Osterholt, Redpath, and Penzel voted "aye"; Pauly abstained. Motion carried. VI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS None. • VII. APPOINTMENTS A. Appointment of 7 members to the Hunting 'Gone Committee Ulstad spoke to the memo of February 28th, and the addition of Mike Septer and Robert Dolson to be considered for appointment. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, that of the eight members chosen by the Council. the Mayor'appoint 7 members to the Hunting Zone Committee, with the charge th.. the Commission report to the City Coun- cil at their earliest opportunity, their recommendations regarding the increase of hunting zones within Eden Prairie for 1930, within the areas presently not regulated. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Pauly abstaining. 916 Council Minutes -6 - March 4, 1980 VIII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS 0 A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 80-05, licensing and regulating the use and sale of intoxicating liquor and amending Ordinance No. 202. as amended by Ordinances Nos. 320 and 76-46 This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (III. L.) B. )esolution No. 80-56, continuing Eden Prairie's participation under the new LiAA Legislation as a Joint Hennepin County. City of Minneapolis and Suburban Unit of Government combination entitlement jurisdication This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (III. M.) C. Resolution No. 80-45, granting final approval for Municipal • Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $1,400,U4.0u for Suburban Associates This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (III. N.) D. Resolution No. 80-46, granting final approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $1.350,000.00 for Donald Russ City Attorney Roger Pauly spoke to the changes contained in the Resolution which he distributed this evening pertaining the City's rights to payment (deletion of Section 4.9) and to deletion of Section 7 (Amendment of Bond Resolution). MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt the amended Resolution No. 80-46, granting final approval for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of $1,350,000.00 for Donald Russ. Motion carried unanimously. ' IX. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Request by Menard, Inc. for an addition to their existing storage facility Mr. Mary Prochaska, Menard Inc., presented the request for an addition to their existing storage facility, explaining that they have found it advantageous to enlarge the storage building in order to house more materials that have previously been stored outside. The 25' by 144' addition would be on the southwesterly side, and they did not feel it would change the roof line. In addition, they agreed to continue the brick facing on the new section. 1 Mayor Penzel questioned how much it would reduce the need for outside storage. Prochaska responded that they are adding 3600 sq. ft., or 200 linear feet of inside storage, which amounts to about two additional aisles. Redpath questioned Prochaska about plans for Valley View Rd. to the south, and expressed disappointment with present status of screening. Prochaska referred to past discussion on screening of neighboring pro- perties and to agreement that property owners would approach representa- tives of Menards if they wanted something done. 91l Council Minutes - 7- March 4, 1980 A. Request by Menard facility (continued) Penzel spoke to strong Council feeling that screening be worked out for the area, and inquired whetherany neighbors had been approached. Pro- chaska responded negative, but it is their feeling that it is premature to be considering the screening at this point. Bids are now being re- quested, and the dirt moving project is their main problem presently. The estimated completion date is December 1st. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Pauly, to approve the request by Menard, Inc. for an addition to their existing storage facility. Motion carried unanimously. B. Riley Purgatory Creek and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District':: request for Cou:.cil's support of proposed legislation Mr. Howard Peterson, representing Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District, explained the purpose of their request to the Legislature for an increased mill levy for operational purposesfor the Nine Mile Creek and Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed Districts. The basic factor is the economic situation, ex- plaining that they are limited to one mill or a$75,000 limit in terms of levy for their operation. In response to a request by Senator Keefe, he has done a study of projects and their financing over the past ten years, noting the increased involvement in Eden Prairie and the incurring costs. They have sponsored bills in the House and Senate that would allow the Water- shed Districts to increase the mill levy to a maximum of $125,000; for the two districts, and they are asking for support from the Council. Penzel expressed support and appreciation for the work of the Watershed Districts, noting excellent cooperation in the past between these bodies and the City. • MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to direct the Staff to draft a Resolution in support of proposed legislation sponsored by the Riley Pur- gatory Creek and Nine Mile Creek Watershed Districts. Motion carried unani- mously. X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members Mayor Penzel spoke to: 1. E.P.A. communication.. 2. Specific request by Senator Keefe to keep him informed on any matter of importance regarding the hazardous waste matter, as present legislation is undertain. 3. Upcoming meeting on March 22 regarding concerns of control by communities of their own destiny, and requested a volunteer to to serve on the steering committee. Councilwoman Pauly inquired whether there had been any invitation to participate in the Athena awards for this year, and requested that it be looked into. 9j1 Council Minutes -I - March 4, 1990 B. Report of City Attorney ( City Attorney Pauly discussed the revisions in the draft distributed„ explain- ing that basically, the scope is set forth on the first page. He reviewed the architect's responsibilities, as well as services. A cap of $2,000,000..00, for the project cost has been put on, on which the architect's fee would be based. The architect should design the project with alternates, and these would come before the Council after committee action. He explained that the City would have the right to terminate the architect's contract at any time, on notice; and if so, fees are paid on monthly basis and according to phases. The City would only have to pay the fees attributable to that phase. Edstrom further questioned the monthly payment during each phase. Pauly res- ponded that the monthly payment would be based on the amount of services rendered for each phase each month. There was further discussion on the possibility of bonds not being sold, with Pauly responding that the City could make the judgement whether to abandon the project after the schematic design phase. Osterholt questioned the archtect's responsibilities about the construction of the facility itself. Pauly explained the architect's general supervisory res— ponsibilities during the construction phase to have a person to observe that fff the plans and specifications and customary tests are being followed. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom,the adoption of the contract document to engage the architect for the purpose of developing plans and specs t for the Community Center as presented tonight; and to direct the City Attorney to negotiate the concerns that the Council has expressed regarding the right to suspend the architect's work without actually terminating the contract. at some period of time (60 days), at certain designated points in the contract, based upon the satisfactory resolution of these concerns. Motion carried unanimously. C. Report of City Manager There was no report by the City Manager. D. Report of Director of Community Services • 1. Request permission to advertise and receive bids for grading at Staring Lake Park and Flying cloud ballfields • This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (III. O.) 2. Swedlund Property on Riley Lake a Director of Community Services Bob Lambert spoke to his memo of February 22ni .and to the recommendation made by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission that the Council consider obtaining this property and that the use of refunds from the Met Council would be appropriate use for acquisition of lake shore on Lake Riley. They suggested further the selling of the existing Riley Lake Park if addition- al funds are necessary. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to instruct tie Staff to get appraisals on Dutches Resort and the Swedlund property, and pro rate funds to develop same. Motion carried 4-0-1, Osterholt abstaining. Council Minutes -9 - March 4, 1980 D. Report of Director of Community Services (continued) ( 3. Award tractor bids. This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (III. P.) 4. Janke property purchase - Anderson Lakes This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (III. Q.) 5. City/School Site trade-off Lambert spoke to his memo of February 25th indicating the status of each of the parcels involved and answered questions of the Council. • MOTIONS Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, that a joint meeting be held with the School Board to clarify positions on this matter. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Tree Disease Program City Forester Stuart Fox spoke to the Parka, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommendation that the City operate a chip site to dispose of our tree debris for 1980. He explained that the Metro Council and Hennepin County have made direct recommendation that no de- • bris, as far as solid waste, or tree debris be put into sanitary landfills. The Staff also recommends theoperation of a chip disposal site allowing the City to continue to maintain their current program of services. the Council requested more specific figures on the various alternatives discussed by Fox for the meeting of March 18th. E. Report of City Engineer 1. Resolution No. 80-52, ordering improvements on Valley View Road, Haines Way and yell Road, I.C. 51-325 This item moved to Consent Calendar (Ill. R.) 2. Consider bids for Stage I improvements on Valley View Road and Haines Jay, I.C. 51-325A, and site grading at Hound Lake Park, 1.C. 51-325B (Resolution No. &-53) City Engineer Carl Jullie spoke to the memo on the results of the bids which were opened for Phase 1 of the Valley View Rd. improvements. The Staff is recommending that the Council consider deferring awarding the bids fora period of 60 days (May 6, 1930)'in order to allow the City ample time to determine if we will be in a position to sell bonds at that time. k; MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to continue this item to the March 19th meeting because of the uncertain financial market at this time. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Resolution No. qO-55, ordering of feasibility report for improvements Cr! Anderson Lakes Parkway from Preserve Boulevard to Lake r:den North Addition, i.... 51-341 This item moved to Consent Calendar(IlI. S.) qao • • Council Minutes -10- March 4, 1980 fj E. Report of City Engineer (continued) 4. Change Order No. 2, Shady Oak Road improvements, I.C.51-344A, for additional swamp mucking and time extension This item moved to Consent Calendar (III. T.) { F. Report of Finance Director 1. Report from Ehlers & Association on sale of park bonds (continued from February 19, 1980) Mr. William Fahey, Ehlers and Associates, Inc., spoke to his letter of February 29th, and answered questions by the Council. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, that the Staff be directed to send a letter to the Senate and House authors and our own representa- tives, as well au the Governor, requesting their prompt and favorable attention to our request of increase of the interest limit to at least 9%, preferable to 10%; and approval given for Eden Prairie to be listed among communities that have these needs and how it proposes to solve its problems. Motion carried unanimously. XI. NEW BUSINESS ( A. Illegal house on County Rd. 1 The situation was.discussed and the.suggestion of an amendment to the house moving Ordinance was considered. B. Communication regarding unleashed dogs in the Coach Light Manor neighborhood The issue was discussed, with varying suggestions made fora solution. C. Fenzel spoke to communication received regarding the dumping of hazardour -- wastes in the sanitary landfill, and asked for clarification from the City Engineer and requested that he check with Hennepin County to see what can be done. D. Cable Commission MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, that no Eden Prairie Council member meet with Cable Commission representatives other than in public meet. ings. Motion.carried unanimously. XII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Redpath, to adjourn at 11110 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. 921 UNAPPROVED MINUTES EOEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESOAY, MARCH 1B, 1980 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Wolfgang Penzel, Dean Edstrom, Dave • Osterholt, Sidney Pauly and Paul Redpath COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT: Acting City Manager John Frane; Director of Community Services Bob Lambert; Planning Director Chris Enger; City Engineer Carl Jullie; and Joyce Provo, Recording Secretary INVOCATION: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel • PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: All members present. I. APPROVAL OF AGENOA ANO OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following items were removed from the regular agenda to the Consent Calendar: V. A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 79-35, rezoning .78 acres from C-Comm to Office for Multi-tenant office building, Mile West Office Building b Bud Andrus and develo er's a reement; 'J. B. Final a roval of MI08's McG1 nn Bakeries 1,300,000. Reso ution No. 80-5 , Reso ut on a rov n Dedication of Elementary School Sites Resolution No. R80-62 ; VI. E. I. Consider bids for Stage I improvements on Valley View Road and Hames Way, I.C. 51-325A, and site grading at Round Lake Park, I.C. 51-325B (Resolution No. 80-53) (Continued from March 4, 1980); and VI. E. 2. Survey Correction for Harry Rogers Property. The following new item was added to the Consent Calendar: Setting a Special Joint City Council/School Board Meeting for Thursday, March 20th at the Eden lsrairie High School, 6:30 PM. The following item was added as item VI. D. 4. M.A.C. Lease. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the agenda as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. • II. CONSENT CALENOAR A. Clerk's License List B. Change Order No. 1, I.C. 51-319, Norsethan Industrial Park 2nd, West 74th Street C. Confirming transfer of Outlots A and B, Shady Oak Industrial Park 2nd • D. Request to set Public Hearing for Minnesota Vikings for Municipal Industrial Devel onent Bond approval in the amount of S6,000,000.00 from April 1, 1980 ( to April 15, 1980 E. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 79-35, rezoning .78 acres from C-Comm to Office for Fit-TM-tenant office building, Mile West Office Building,+ Bud Andrus and developer's agreement (formerly item V. A.) 922, Council Minutes - 2 - Tues.,March 18, 1980 F. Final approval of MIDB's McGlynn Bakeries $1,300,000.00 (Resolution No. 80-59) Formerly item V. B. G. Resolution approving Dedication of Elementary School Sites (Resolution No. R80-62) Formerly item V. C. !' H. Consider bids for Stage I improvements on Valley View Road and Hames Way, I. C. 51-325A, and site grading at Round Lake Park, I.C. 51-325B (Resolution No. BO-53) Continued from March 4, 1980. (Formerly item E. 1.) City Engineer's recommendation was approved continuing consideration of bids for this project to May 6, 1980. I. Survey Correction for Harry Rogers Property (formerly item E. 2.) J. Setting a Special Joint City Council/School Board meeting for Thursday, March 20, 19B0, 6:30 PM at the Eden Prairie High School MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve items A - J on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. III. PUBLIC HEARINGS j. A. Request for Municipal Industrial Development Bond approval for Tekcom Properties in the amount of $1,250,000.00 (continued from February 19, 1980) Resolution No. 80-21 John Mutschler, representing Tekcom Properties, spoke to the request for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds, adding since the January 22nd Council meeting when this item was first considered they have been busy leasing the proposed building. They now have 50% of the office space leased including a "Letter of Intent" on 2,500 square feet of office space. The proponents also have leases on all of the warehouse space. Pauly asked what type of employment would be offered. Mr. Mutschler replied Tekcom would eventually employ 45 people, primarily as lightassembly operators. j{ Edstrom questioned the terms of the proposed leases. Mr. Mutschler responded they would be standard three year leases. City Attorney Pauly requested an amendment be made to Resolution No. 80-21, as this resolution was drafted sometime ago and subsequent to that time a provision has been inserted in resolutions of this kind, i.e., "All commitments ' of the City expressed herein are subject to the condition that within 12 months of the date of adoption of this resolution the City and the Borrowers shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the revenue agreement, the bonds and of the other instruments and proceedings relating to the bonds and their issuance and sale. If the event set forth herein do not take place within the time set forth above or any extension thereof and the bonds are not sold within such time, this resolution shall expire and be of no further force and effect." Council members and Mr. Mutschler concurred with this amendment. Osterholt asked if Mr. Frane would recommend approval of this request. Acting City Manager Frane responded in the affirmative. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 80-21 as amended, approving the request for Municipal Industrial Development Bond approval in the amount of $1,250,000.00 for Tekcom Properties. Redpath, Osterholt, Edstrom and Pauly voted "aye"; Penzel voted "nay". Motion carried. �� Council Minutes - 3 - Tues.,March 18, 1980 B. Norseman Industrial Park 4th Addition by Herleiv Helle. Request to rezone 4.89 acres from Rural to I-2 and preliminary plat 1 industrial lot. Located north of West 74th Street, 945 feet west of Washington Avenue (Ordinance No. 80-07 and Resolution No. 80-41) George Hoff, representing Mr. Helle, spoke to the proposal and offered to answer questions of Council members. Mr, Hoff stated the proponent has no objections to any of the staff recommendations. City Planner Enger explained this item was considered at a Public Hearing before the Planning Commission on February 11, 1980, and the Commission voted 4 - 1 to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning from Rural to I-2 Park and preliminary platting of 1 industrial lot subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated February 8, 1980, Edstrom asked if there have been any concerns expressed from the residents north of the parcel on the steep drop down to this property from the hill. Enger replied staff has not received any negative comments, adding the slope currently is about 2 - band it will be graded somewhat further back toward the north and will remain a 2 - 1 slope. Penzel asked when the City will cone to the point when Valley View relocated will be dedicated. Enger responded staff feels the road should be dedicated and installed west of this property and north to Valley View Road with any platting subsequent to the 4th Addition1which Mr. Helle is willing to agree to. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to close the Public Hearing and give a 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 80-07, rezoning 4.89 acres from Rural to I-2 Park for Norseman Industrial Park 4th Addition by Herleiv Helle. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pauly moved, seconded by Osterholt, to adopt Resolution No. 80-41, appro- ving the preliminary plat for Norseman Industrial Park 4th Addition by Herleiv Helle. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Redpath, to direct Staff to draft a developer's agreement incorporating the recommendations of the Planning Commission and Staff Report dated February 8, 1980. Motion carried unanimously. C. Sunset Trails by Countryside Investments, Inc. Request to rezone 9 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 and preliminary plat 18 lots for single family homes. Located west of Ouck Lake Road and north of Sunset Ridge and Valley Knolls • Additions. (Ordinance No. 80-09 and Resolution No. 80-42) Cliff Swenson of Countryside Investments spoke to the proposal.. City Planner Enger explained this item was first considered at the December 10, 1979 Planning Commission meeting, then at the January 14, January 2Bth and February 11, 1980 meetings. The Commission recommended to the City Council on a 4 - 0 vote approval of the preliminary plat dated 2/80 and the request for rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 for 18 lots according to the plat dated 2/80 and Staff Report dated 2/7/80. Director of Community Services Lambert spoke in detail to the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission's motion adopted 3/3/80 recommending approval to the City Council of the preliminary plat as proposed. Lambert added the suggestion that the developer when he is grading High Trail Estates grade the mini-park for the City - the City could then seed it and put in the play- ground equipment which would be about a $3,500 cost to the City. 911.1 Council Minutes - 4 - Tues.,March 18, 1980 C. Sunset Trails by Countryside Investments, Inc. (continued) Jim Bast, 17440 West 66th Street, commented he has met with the developer and as a neighborhood they like the proposal. Mr. Bast did not think the trail inbetween the lots would be feasible as on the edge there is a real swamp now and lots of standing water. Penzel agreed with Mr. Bast from a standpoint of useability, and stated he does not know if he really wants to encourage the use of the floodplain because it would be more destructive to the habitat than really a benefit to those going through it. The beauty lies in it being there and the visual benefit to the neighborhood. • Mr. Bast further questioned if the trail through the mini-park along the high ground might someday be made public. Lambert replied in the affirmative. Edstrom asked what staff knew about the property that is located to the north of this project. Enger replied the property is owned by Ecklund & Swedlund, and City staff has met with Ecklund & Swedlund and McCombs - Knutson, their engineers, who have shown preliminary layouts which indicate single family use of that area. The current proponents, Countryside Investments, have met with Ecklund & Swedlund as to the connection of Durango Drive. MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing and give a 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 80-09, rezoning 9 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 for Sunset Trails by Countryside Investments, Inc. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No. 80-42, approving the preliminary plat for Sunset Trails by Countryside Investments, Inc. • Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Osterholt, to direct Staff to draft a developer's agreement incorporating the recommendations of the Planning Staff and Commissions, along with the recommendation of Oirector of Community Services Lambert that the proponents grade the mini-park when the developer is grading High Trail Estates. Motion carried unanimously. D. Gonyea PUD by Gonyea Investment. Request for PUD Concept approval for medium density residential, elderly housing, offices and restaurant uses on 37 acres. Located in the NE corner of TH 5 and Co. Rd. 4 (Resolution No. 80-43) Howard Dahlgren, Howard Dahlgren Associates, explained he has been working with Oennis Gonyea for the last two years on the property which is located on the NE corner of Co. Rd. 4 and T.H. 5. They have met numerous times with neighbors, with the City Staff, and the Planning Commission and are trying earnestly to do the right thing in the right way on'the property to include the City's interest which includes drainage, parks, land development that will be compatible with existing investments in the area and will be reasonable in terms of the potential that is there for the property. Mr. Oahlgren added the proponents met with the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission on March 17th and the Commission voted to consider the possibility of a trail through the property which will link up to the shopping center and they would like to have additional time to consider that possibility. The proponents are, therefore, not looking for any decision tonight as the Council may be interested in what the Commission has in mind in terms of the parks aspects of the property. C. John Uban, Howard Oahlgren Associates, Inc., landscape architect, displayed graphics of the plan they have prepared, and the evolution of the plans they have Council Minutes - 5 - Tues.,March 18, 1980 D. Gonyea PUD by Gonyea Investment (continued) worked out over a period of time with the neighbors. The latest plan is for ( 8 acres of ponding and open space, which is well over the capacity needed, a 14,000 square foot office space office building which shares an access point with properties to the east, an elderly unit, and 31 single family homes which then have rear yards which face the rear yards of the abutting single family homes, 2 single offices, a small 16,000 square foot clinic - which may now go to a veterinarian which is less traffic, and a full service restaurant (family style). The circulation system has remained basically the same, linking up and co- ordinating with the entrance from the shopping center which they feel produces the best traffic pattern on the site. Uban added they are trying to produce a development with a variety of uses, one of which where all of the peak hours would not come together all at the same time and that is why they want a mix of uses on the property so the traffic is spread over an even amount of time. • City Planner Enger reviewed the actions taken by the Planning Commission at meetings held 8/13/79, 9/10/79, 10/22/79 and finally on 11/13/79. The longevity which this project has been in the process is due to the problems with traffic encountered and in hopes to find a solution. The Commission's motion on a 3 - 3 tie vote was as follows: Approval of the PUD Concept dated 11/7/79 per the recommendations of the Staff Report dated 11/8/79 with the following additions: 1) under item 3 there should be an addition that the cash park fee 99 would not be required for the elderly housing units, and 2) under item 7 an addition that any commercial development on this site be contingent upon specific traffic improvement requirements and solutions to be determined prior to rezoning and/or preliminary platting. t Penzel stated under the circumstances the Council might well want to have the Planning Commission take one more look at the proposal with the latest data on the traffic situation, which would also provide the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission a chance to look at the trails a little bit further. This item could then be considered at the April 15th Council meeting with a recommendation from both commissions. At the request of Councilman Osterholt, Mr. Roscoe traffic consultant for the proponents, went over the estimated trips per day and answered questions of Council members. Joe Lawler, 7621 Ontario Boulevard, expressed concern with the storm drainage coming off the holding pond. Mr. Lawler felt any development on that corner may aggravate the speed of the runoff since he is a property owner along the north- east flow area out of that drainage holding area. He already has 1/3 of his property flooded now, as do four of his other neighbors, as a result of previous construction and grading errors by a developer of the Meadows 3rd Addition subdivision. Lawler asked if there is a comprehensive solution for storm drainage from that holding area until that drainage flow gets to Purgatory Creek, and if so, what is the comprehensive solution. City Engineer Jullie replied sometime ago, about 2 1/2 years ago, the City did experience problems with drainage of the low area and a feasibility report was undertaken to determine what storage requirements were necessary and what piping and conduits and ditching, etc., would be necessary to properly handle the drainage runoff expected from this development and others on the south side of Highway 5 and west of Co. Rd. 4 which drain into that low area. The report is partially completed, have worked up the elevations of the areas required and the storage volumes needed, but came to an impasse in terms of the actual feasibility of the project because of the cost of acquiring the right-of-way for the drainage pond. If this proposal is approved through the City process and the drainage area 92G Council Minutes - 6 - Tues.,March 18, 1980 D. Gonyea PUD by Gonyea Investment (continued) that the City needs is dedicated by the developer, then the City can proceed to finalize the report and call a public hearing and proceed with the necessary ( drainage improvements that are needed within the drainage district. City staff would work with the landowner to see what his timing is, when the land could be acquired, proper grades determined, and proceed from there. The problem the people are having over to the east of this project relates to some constriction in that drainage channel to the east of their properties - what that constriction is Jullie stated he does not know at this time. With the proper design of the storm sewer pond, although the total volume of the runoff will be increased because of the hard surface, the flow rate should be decreased so they won't get a big gush of water because this pond will absorb the ups and downs of the initial flows. Stan Riegert, owner and operator of Prairie Lawn & Garden, commented he has concern • about how the people are going to get in and out of the office building. Mr. Dahlgren pointed out the access point. Mr. Riegert added the road Mr, Dahlgren pointed out is going to come right along his initial driveway and the graphics which are displayed are incorrect as Prairie Lawn & Garden are not even shown as being in existence. Mr. Uban replied the survey was done prior to the building of Prairie Lawn & Garden. Penzel added the Council at this point is discussing concept and not rezoning of any of the properties, nor discussing a specific location of accesses other than those on County Road 4 as they are existing intersections which need to be lined up with, The design details need to be worked out during the rezoning process and each of these parcels will require an application for that purpose, Osterholt suggested in any future drawings that are submitted that Mr, Reigert's property be specifically located so the Council can see what the impact is, Osterholt added he would also like to see the land further north behind Mr. Riegert's and the other property adjoining specifically located. Mr. Quaal, 16191 Westgate Trail, wanted to know how cars could be kept off the bicycle trails as this has presented a real danger. City Engineer Jullie responded the City is suggesting for road improvements.a 36 foot extension from the center line which would provide a left turn lane, a through lane, and a right turn lane, and also a concrete sidewalk on that side of the road which would separate the pedestrians from the traffic. The 8 foot trail is really what is designed for the bicyclists which would be on the west side of County Road 4. Penzel questioned when the bikeway trail is going to he built along County Road 4 from 1 on northerly. City Planner Enger replied the City originally scheduled four years ago the entire improvement from Co. Rd. 1 to Minnetonka. In the current improvement with Community Development Block Grant funds and State funds it only goes from County Road 1 to T.H. 5, and Enger commented he does not know when the bikeway will be extended north of Highway 5. There were plans at one time, and there are still plans that go all the way up to Minnetonka, so the bikeway is designed but there currently is not any funding. Director of Community Services Lambert added there won't be any funding forthcoming because as far as the County is concerned there is already a trail north of T.H. 5 on Co. Rd. 4.. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to continue the Gonyea PUD request until April 15, 1980, and referred this item to Staff and the Commissions for ( review. Motion carried unanimously. 92.-1 Council Minutes - 7 - Tues.,March iB, 19B0 • E. Request for Municipal Industrial Oevelopment Bond approval for Alston and Jean Lundgren in the amount of $300,000.00 (Resolution No. 80-58) Dr. Alston Lundgren spoke to the request for Municipal Industrial Development Bond approval in the amount of $300,000.00 to be used for the purpose of building a clinic close to the corner of Eden Prairie Road and County Road 5. Dr. Alston Lundgren stated initially he will occupy the building and hopefully will grow to a group of approximately 6 physicians over the period of the next seven years. Eden Prairie Family Physicians will be the sole tenants. MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 80-58, approving the request for Municipal Industrial Development Bond approval in the amount of $300,000.00 for Alston and Jean Lundgren. Motion carried unanimously. F. Request for Municipal Industrial Development Bond approval for Steven & Bruce Hoyt in the amount of $2,035,000.00 (Resolution No. 80-57) Dennis McFadden, Knutson Mortgage Company, representing the proponents, stated they have a large parcel of land which is very difficult to divide. Their current situation is they have one entire building consisting of 70,000 square feet entirely leased at this point, the second building is not leased to any extent. McFadden commented they have been advised by Finance Director Frane and the City staff that the City Council would tend to look awry on the second building being speculative. Therefore, Mr. McFadden requested the Council continue this item for four weeks, giving them time to secure a tenant for the second building, and in order that they may work with Mr. Frane and come to the Council with one project. Finance Director Frane recommended the Council close the Public Hearing and take no action as the proponents will be coming back with a new proposal. MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Osterholt, to close the Public Hearing on the Municipal Industrial Oevelopment Bond request by Steven & Bruce Hoyt in the amount of $2,035,000.00 and take no action, awaiting the proponents request for another Public Hearing. Motion carried unanimously. G. Vacation of Public Roadway in Section 1-116-22 east of Shady Oak Road (Resolution No. 80-70) City Engineer Juilie spoke to Resolution No. BO-70, cohcurring with the request for the vacation of the right-of-way. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. BO-70, vacating 20' of Public Roadway in Section 1-116-22. Motion carried unanimously. 1 H. Rymariand Camp 2nd Addition by Milton Quam. Request to rezone 23 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 and RM 6.5 and preliminary plat 13 single family lots and 56 lots for duplexes MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Osterholt, to close the Public Hearing granting the request of the proponents to withdraw their request and that the Council take no further action. Motion carried unanimously. ')2I a Council Minutes - 8 - Tues.,March 18, 1980 IV. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 7671 - 7931 MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to approve Payment of Claims Nos. ( 7671 - 7931. Roll Call Vote: Redpath, Edstrom, Osterholt, Pauly and Penzel voted "aye", with Osterholt "abstaining" on Claim No. 7897. Motion carried unanimously. V. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 79-35, rezoning .78 acres from C-Corn to Office for Multi-tenant office building, Mile West Office Building, by Bud Andrus and deve oper's agreement This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (II. E.). •B. Final approval of MIDB's McGlynn Bakeries $1,300,000 (Resolution No. 80-59) This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (II. F.). C. Resolution approving Dedication of Elementary School Sites (Resolution No. 80-62) This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (II. G.). VI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members ( 1. Councilman Redpath spoke to Resolution No. 80-63, recommending adoption of same. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Edstrom, to adopt Resolution No. 8D-63, extending the deadline date for filing "official application forms for supplying Cable communications service through a joint system to the cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Mayor Penzel referred to a conversation he had with a resident recently who inquired about the swimming pool ordinance which was adopted by the City Council last year regarding the verbage on "self-closing" and"self-locking gates". The gentleman is taking issue with that primarily because he feels: I) there is no such thing as a "self-locking patio door", which many people have as an entry to their pool area, and 2) just because the gates are self-locking doesn't provide any protection for the intent of keeping casual people out of the area and the pool. The gentleman is requesting Council's consideration in amending that particular section by adding to the last paragraph: "whenever the pool is unattended all gates within the fence or wall shall be secured so that they cannot be opened from the outside". Council referred this item to the City Attorney for review, and if the City Attorney feels the amendment should be made to the ordinance that it be brought back to the Council for consideration. B. Report of City Attorney No report. C. Report of City Manager No report. g�9 i Council Minutes - 9 - Tues„March 18, 1980 D. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Appraisals of Neighborhood Park Property Director of Community Services Lambert explained in December the Council requested appraisals on three neighborhood sites that were committed neighborhood sites in the bond referendum - Creekwood, Hidden Ponds and Red Rock. Staff received appraisals on those and the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission reviewed those at the March 3rd meeting recommending to the City Council authorization for staff to negotiate at least options on Creekwood 1, Hidden Ponds 1 and Red Rock 1 until the bonds are sold. Lambert expressed some concern with the Creekwood site which he outlined for the Council and requested the Council continue the Creekwood park site until the April 1st Council meeting allowing him further review. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to authorize staff to negotiate options on Hidden Ponds 1 and Red Rock 1, and to bring the Creekwood site back to the Council at the April 1, 1980 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Tree Disease Program City Forester Stuart Fox spoke to the Staff Report dated March 13, 1980 and recommendations contained therein. MOTION: Osterholt moved, seconded by Redpath, to authorize Staff to negotiate for a disposal site at which the City would ship elm debris and rent a chipper. Motion carried unanimously. { 3. Lake Management Program Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to Staff Reports dated February 26 and March 13, 1980. The Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission reviewed this item on March 17th and made the following recommendations: 1) City Staff should try to contact the University of Minnesota and also the City's High School 8iology Department and see if any students would want to enter into some kind of a study on a monitoring program. There may be some costs where the City may have to buy some chemicals for them; however, it would not be close to what Barr Engineering is proposing. 2) The City commit to destratifying the lake in September, and the reason for that is DNR will treat and stock the lake without destratifying; however, they won't be able to treat the lake until late October or early•November - and won't be able to stock the lake until next year, and we would lose out on fishing. There would be no catchable size fish,and the fish they are putting in are large mouth bass, walleyes and sunfish, until late 1982. If we destratify this September, they would treat the lake in September and would stock it in September and we would have catchable size fish the summer of 1981. The Commission also recommended that the Council commit to an aeration program. Estimated cost for destratification - $3,500, aeration - $12,000 (with a continuing cost of approximately $400.00 to $500.00 a year). MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to approve the recommendations of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission and Staff and to authorize Staff to proceed with the Lake Management Program at Round Lake. Motion carried unanimously. /30 Council Minutes - 10 - Tues.,March 18, 1980 4. M.A.C.(Metropolitan Airports Commission) Lease Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to the M.A.C. lease commenting after discussions with City Attorney Pauly and M.A.C.'s attorney there are two items of contention: 1) indemnification - under our first opinion we felt the City did not have the authority to idemnify them. Under recent court judgements that is not true any more; however, we are proposing that we only indemnify them to the limit of our insurance. 2) The crucial question is the 90-day lease termination clause as the Council felt pretty strongly on that and M.A.C. has some FAA rules and some general policies that they have followed on other airports and that is in there to stay. Lambert asked for some direction from the Council. Osterholt commented M.A.C. is currently building a golf course in Richfield on M.A.C. land and suggested staff see what kind of a lease they have and what the terms are. Lambert asked what to do about the contract on the grading. Osterholt replied ask for a 30-day extension from the bidders in case the question isn't resolved. MOTION: Edstrom moved, seconded by Osterholt, to direct Staff to request M.A.C.'s special consideration of the minimum 1 year notice on the proposed lease or the terms comparable to Richfield's, whichever is more favorable. Motion carried unanimously. E. Report of City Engineer • 1. Consider bids for Stage I improvements on Valley View Road and Haines Way, I.C. 51-325A, and site grading at Round Lake Park, I.C. 51-3258 and site grading at Round Lake Park, I.C. 51-325B (Resolution No. 80-53) Continued from 3/4/80 • This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (II. H.). 2. Survey correction for Harry Rogers Property This item was moved to the Consent Calendar (II. I..). F. Report of Finance Director 1. Report from Ehlers & Associates on sale of park bonds (continued from March 4, 1980) • Bill Fahey, Ehlers & Associates, talked about the bond market in general and legislation before the State House and Senate. Fahey recommended the Council consider setting the sale of bonds for April 15, 1980. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by'Osterholt, to adopt Resolution No. 80-68, authorizing the sale of bonds for April 15, 1980. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Report on additional liquor operation Finance Director Frane spoke to the memo from Ward Dahlberg, Manager of the Liquor Store and asked the Council's permission to negotiate terms for a lease for a liquor operation at the Preserve Village Center. Osterholt felt the liquor store sales at Prairie Village Mall being 10% of Penny's Grocery Store sales is too optimistic, and 8% would be more realistic. 931 • Council Minutes - 11 - Tues.,March 18, 1980 2. Report on additional liquor operation (continued) MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to authorize staff to negotiate a lease in the Preserve Village Center for a proposed municipal liquor store and review the figures from Penny's as referred to in memo dated 3/13/80. Further that the Council be provided with a report on the amount of Staff time provided the Liquor Store at Prairie Village Mall, i.e., building inspec- tors, secretarial, finance director. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Referendum on Municipal Liquor Finance Director Frane explained if the City desires to continue its liquor operation, State Statutes require that a referendum question on the continuance of liquor operations be held within one year of the effective date of a census establishing the population beyond 10,000 persons. The effective date of the 1980 census is April 1, 1980. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Osterholt, to authorize the City Clerk to place the question of the continuance of liquor on the November 4th ballot. Motion carried unanimously. VII. NEW BUSINESS No New Business. • VIII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Edstrom, to adjourn the Council meeting at 10:40 PM. Motion carried unanimously. • 932 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • ( CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST April 1, 1980 CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 Family) FOOD HANDLER - TYPE 8 Robert Arendt Construction, Inc. PDQ Food Store Bolles Construction, Inc. ' Homestyles, Inc. FOOD HANDLER - TYPE C CONTRACTOR (Multi-Family & Comm.) Main Street Ice Cream Benson - Orth Associates CIGARETTE & TOBACCO Elder-Jones, Inc. Parker Hannifin Corporation PDQ Food Store Menard, Inc. RETAIL CANDY PLUMBING PDQ Food Store Custom Plumbing, Inc. • Hoff Plumbing PRIVATE KENNEL LICENSE Dennis Holmquist • RI-Don Plumbing R. W. Krupp L. Guy Schoenecker WATER SOFTENER Culligan Water Service, Co. HEATING & VENTILATING Air Associates Como Specialty GAS FITTER • Air Associates These licenses have been approved by the department head responsible for the licensed activity. � C;Alidi Cindy M.`Ptante, Licensing Clerk /53 April 1, 1980 • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. R80-72 • RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND • SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVER • - TISEMENT FOR BIDS (I.C. 51-362, 367 and 372) • I WHEREAS. the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvement to wit, • Street and utility improvements in Village Woods II (I.C. 51-362), Duck Lake Vista (I.C. 51-367) and Alpine Estates II (I.C. 51-372) and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, are hereby approved. • 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in { the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement • under such approved plans and specifications. The adver- tisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall-state that bids will be opened at 10:00 o'clock A.M. on Thursday, May 1, 1980, and con- sidered by the Council at 7:30 o'clock P.M. n Tuesday, May 6, 1980, in the Council Chambers of the CCity Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit,cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid. • ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on fldolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. franc, Clerk • • 934 . (` MEMO TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager • FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: March 27, 1980 SUBJECT: Resolution No. R80-74 Dedication of R/W for T.H. 169/Co. Rd. 1/Vo-Tech Traffic Signal and Widening Improvements S.P.2744-31 MN/DOT has requested that the City adopt Resolution No. R80-74 which dedi- cates for highway purposes a 50' wide strip of land adjacent to T.M. 169, as shown on the attached drawing and which is part of City owned Outlot A, York- shire Point. This strip is needed for the widening of T.H. 169 as related to the permanent traffic signals on Co. Rd. 1 and Vo-Tech school. The project is currently scheduled for letting in October of this year. A small additional portion of Tract A will be needed by MN/DOT for a drainage retention pond. They are in the process of preparing legal descriptions for this additional land and will be acquiring it from the City in the near future. Recommend approval of Resolution No. R80-74. CJJ:kh • Attachment • • .5 . April 1, 1980 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ( RESOLUTION NO. R80-74 RESOLUTION DEDICATING FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES A PORTION OF O.L.A, YORKSHIRE POINT BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the following described property is herein dedicated for public highway purposes to accomodate proposed MN/DOT improvements on T.H. 169 described'as.S.P.2744 (169=5-31-1): That part of Tracts 1 and 2 described below: Tract 1. That part of Outlot A, Yorkshire Point, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, embraced within Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 791, the title thereto being registered as evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 583782; • Tract 2. That part of Outlot A, Yorkshire Point, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the east line of Tract B, Registered Land Survey. No. 791; which ties north+vesteri.y of a line run parallel with and distant 100 feet southeasterly of Line A described below: Line A. From a point on the easterly extension of the south line of Section 22, Township 116 North, Range 22 West, distant 0.05 feet east of the southeast corner thereof, run northerly at an angle of 89 degrees 56 minutes 01 seconds from said easterly extension (measured from west to north) for 568.35 feet to the point of beginning of Line A to be described; thence run southerly on the last described course for 100 feet; thence deflect to the right on a tangential curve having a radius of 1432.39 feet and a delta angle Of 41 degrees 57 minutes 14 seconds for 1048.85 feet; thence on tangent to said curve for 542.83 feet and there terminating: together with that part of Tract 2 hereinbefore'described, adjoining and southeasterly of the above described strip, which lies northerly of the following described line: Frog+ a point on Line A described above, distant 691.68 feet southwesterly of its point of beginning, run southeasterly at right angles to said Line A for 100 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence run easterly to a point distant 165 feet southeasterly (measured at right angles of a point on said Line A, distant 641.68 feet southwesterly of its point of beginning and there terminating; J4 • Res. No. R80-74 (cont'd.) • together with all right of access being the right of ingress to and egress from that part of Tracts 1 and 2 hereinbefore described, not acquired herein to Trunk Highway No. 169, except that the abutting owner shall retain the right of access by way of the second above ddscribed strip to a cul-de-sac only; •The State of Minnesotadoes hereby acquire all rights and interests which the owner of Tract 2 hereinbefore described may or could have in the cattle pass and lanes as provided by Document No. 1345772 re- corded in the office of the County Recorder in Hennepin County on the 13th day of April, 1926, S.P. 2744 (5-31-1), Parcel 14, at approximate • Engineer's Station 2871-90, it being the intention that said cattle pass and lanes shall be forever extinguished and obliterated. ADOPTED by the City of Eden Prairie on dolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEA (. John D. Frane, Clerk • • • • • • -•..%.,,L -' *.•.•;• •-• - — -0 ." . 2 4\A - -•. . s.".:y'...,... / • '* 1• -• '---- gm. •1.•• ..4. t / ...\\ .... ., • \S/ •'-. .. -. - . ..-,.4.•.•'•• - - • CS s•, 1" :. . • t. / te •‘ t C . t .A. \I '. Qs. - -• . ' ... •, • ''... / ... tlit . ( ../• kJ'. ' • A\ 'tar'':- -..:--.... . •'‘‘4-• 1 , ••• L., .- .° •V:, ,01: ' . • Cck :, a' ._ .1.0r....e.-1.1 ... 4....•• . do 5,••,14.......t: ..... S.., pa,...7.t‘i,. ., . +./' 4. •• ' • • 1(. .1t• .:: 1‘ /'", 1..\t •I ••----4i-?., .1 •, h.4 N•fr..t.4 4 e ‘.‘cs,.1r. • ' -!,. \ • '.- N ...,-,-..c.; • ••" ,,,e../4" -•• •••1••ifi.a :._ . ' „,,,------4.-....-e• 1 • - -.- <c/\ - ' 1-: 0 Yi... L,......• S.• ‘. ye 1,: -•...:2 t..,..,*-4", ,-", Ci, 1 • <_,:,.....-..-r--", 1:-' 'v....I-I,:r-1,:o' ,--. ..,,• ,N* ' ---- ' "4—.. •.I. 0,G tic ___. •./eq •.".... .-. .-•-,..7;•:'--1---,,..,.. f5-. 1"' '''' 1 - \„.t.4....,' „.../". - 1. • ///: .--, _ t.‘,.. , -it -.- .'• . . /--- . c. 04 •Se- - •• ..• ----- -',... ••- .••-•''''''''...7 3..{•••• '1 11‘•'. ' ici • X ye -- :"...7-ii..... .7.....--........-..„..v.• ........ ....,...._-_,„_. _T.__ ...„_k7.7 .. . :0''''' 1,.;:f . ' t.e .14• V VA .... Ts " '4' ,„_ •.1.. • ,........... I' • • • - • 7 zi,..! . • --.• . . t-7:-,-3 m- - --7. ''''. ----- :/ '..'.--,- `7-,‘ ',..-'-‘. . • , ,.. r, "; ..-'::..'„-:.-,:•--....1,..it,... '.-•• ... nn. .7_,.4; - . ,- „..- ,....a..:4.-f % i +.•14. -.. .eSt• , 1 A Er ...., _.„,„!,... .x.,,....'4'Ci.j.5.,._••••• •>%... i.,/,,, 4... :1. 9;r4f1:_i-' . ...5-..,t.'• - a r; ri..riNirF 4' ' •'. ".•....6.7 - I • - 4,0 'i o . 'R.'-41;I -3J - • - '- ....C- '.\-- ' __. I I.../4!vz . - .f.../ '''';,#•"--.c-4,... I „,• E 0 154 .. - ......,...-..:-- . ....z.... ...._ , --. , A , ..• • • ....-.. . ' .77 •i • </- C., .- 64'. t .N..),•^ L.L.'IL ''.-''L i• C' .. .'':•:.-4-•s:. ..7 - .f •"•-.). > •''<t1 Is • • ' .1 - '....-5:) :4: 5• :•- ' ••- "") •is ! ...N.' / ... • 4-7 A 41.111/1" , -1/ / „.,, • I -.: : - •:,,, /),,, -:- / . c.:,7 ., .,_::,. ....., , ,... , .. 1",4....i... .,„. ..,, .„. , q ' ,_- ' . -7:• ,4 : ',:;-/E4 r . ---. .// //4. '‘'.<5 \ 1•• . A. .." 2 A.( \ . .. -. • / ,„/ -a..r"--- — • •\ • . k3i,/ .,_ ..... ./. ., *-4 -/ 1 4 • - • • K\I ; .1.! . --. •.! -:'•.„. ..,.. .... \ ..:/. // /‘.1:1 .•j ,Ps"• • V.ii r;___ _ : . , . . ,;..",..,. 4.s.. • -----..A , P ..1 - i•;'s:.' ‘ -'• '; --- •• •• `.. v / / •.. . . . , . -----:,-"-/ s, • ,-,' y I\ ---'4 -• . ..t.v".".:!...;. ....„,1• W..•• •„ :.,.. k• *TN f',!1AJ• ..,.. . ) • * .• 7. -_,- • - 17 P.- L'')'.17 ..., • . ' s ry.-e- r ' •L \ "').7,/ ,•. ‘.\\ ri:.. .',i I \ ‘I;t7/ • ,', ., • • .1 :- ., i ...• i ty/ • \ . As• • - <t',;)/ \: •-• 4U . . . . . . • McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. ,))))))L CONSULTING ENGINEERS I LAND SURVEYORS I SIT)PLANNERS Reply To: i2800 industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth.Minnesota 55441 (B12)5593700 March 25, 1900 p-VP Staff and City Council Members City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Subject: Milt Quam Rymarland Camp 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat Job #5370 Dear Sir: We would like to request the above that the above mentioned subject be put ( on the next City Council Agenda and a public hearing be set. If you need any further information, please advise. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, Inc. Peter A. Bishop PAB:jl 931 Minneapolis- Hutchinson-Alexandria-Granite Falls p 1.1.+tv..s. • CARDARELLE t ASSOCIATES. INC. • LAND 6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE 1 EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55344 941-3030 VAR 21 March 25, 1980 • Mr. Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Re: New Office Building at 8123 Eden Avenue for Cardarelle & Associates, Inc. Dear Mr. Ulstad: We would like to have our hearing as soon as possible before the Eden Prairie City Council. Thank you very much for your'consideration in this matter and if you need any information please contact me and I will supply any additional prints or other information that you may need. Sincerely, • • , Frank R. Cardarelle FRC:esc ( d • 91t0 MAR 27 MO e\d�� 11 InnESOm. dicu,c,s , a�+ 9n0 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH•EDINA,MN 54435•mat 920-4806 March 27, 1980 Mayor and City Council 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Gentlemen: It was not possible for us to compile all the information necessary for the April 15, 1980 public hearing relative to our request for Municipal Industrial Development Bonds. There- fore, we request you to continue the public hearing to your May 6, 1980 meeting. Respectfully, ,al�i1.�►r�-,�- GRADY , 'ERMAN Director of Planning and Development GA/nc • 941 Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes -2- March 10, 1980 Gartner gave a brief explanation of the three different alignments ( of Highway 212. •Levitt inquired what was holding up the Citizen's Committee recom- mendations. • Gartner stated that E.A.W.'s have to be done on each of the align- ments and that there then has to be a mutual agreement with all people involved before they will have an official alignment. VI. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. VIKING OFFICE AND TRAINING FACILITY, by •Condon/Naegele Realty . • Company. Request for PUO Concept approval for office/indus- trial uses on 73 acres & PUD Development Stage approval, rezoning from Rural & I-2 Park to Office for 15 acres, and preliminary plat approval. A public hearing. Don Brauer, gave a presentation explaining; the existing zoning, the requested zoning, the site plans, the size of the lots, the proposed drainage systems, the proposed grading systems, the road systems, and the construction timing. The Planner went over the recommendations of the staff report dated February 20, 1980. The Commission had general concerns over the lack of an east ( •to west road, the grading of the wooded hill, sewer capacity limitations on Washington Avenue,and the length of the proposed cul-de-sacs. Brauer stated that he does not feel that an east to west road would be economically practical, or beneficial to the City or the developer. He stated that he felt that the roads proposed by the developer would be more beneficial and economically feasible for the developer. Bearman stated that he would like the City's Public Safety Department to look at this proposal and give their opinion of the length of the cul-de-sacs. MOTION: Bentley moved, Gartner seconded to close the public hearing. Notion carried 4 - 0. MOTION: Bentley moved, Levitt seconded to recommend the City Council refer the P.U.D. concept request back to the proponent for revision, exclusive of the Pastern 15 acres as outlined in the staff report dated 2-20-80. Motion carried 4 - O. MOTION: Bentley moved, Gartner seconded to recommend to the City Council approval of the rezoning from Rural & I-2 Park to office for 15 acres according to the material dated February 20, 1980 and the staff report dated February 20, 1980 proved that the Public Safety Department submit their opinion of lengthy cul-de-sacs and that detailed grading plans be sub- mitted prior to City Council review. 44.2 i Planning Commission Minutes -3- March 10, 1980 MOTION: Bentley moved, Levitt seconded to recommend to the ( City Council approval of the preliminary plat dated February 20, 1980 according to the staff report dated February 20, 1980 provided that the Public Safety Department submit their opinion - of lengthy cul-de-sacs and that detailed grading plans be sub- mitted prior to City Council review. Motion carried 4 - 0. • . B. TUDOR OAKS, by ABIO Holdings - Mn inc. Development stage approval of the P.U.D. to include preliminary platting of 44 acres into 3 lots and 2 outlots. Brauer gave a brief presentation explaining;the changes in this project, what the developer is requesting at this time, the road systems, and the construction timing. The Commission had general concerns on the proposed access on to Schooner Boulevard, the proposed road, the garage setbacks, the possibilitj of signalization on 169/212, and the devel- opers ideas for the southeastern portion of this site and . outlot B. The Planner went over the recommendation of the staff report dated February-21, 1980 and the MnDOT Letter dated February 27, 1970. . MOTION: Levitt moved, Bentley seconded to close the public ( hearing. Motion carried 4 - O. { MOTION: Levitt moved, Bentley seconded to recommend to the City Council approval of.the Tudor Oaks preliminary plat dated December 15, 1979 per the staff report dated February 21, 1980 and the recommendations of the MnDOT letter dated February 27, 1980. Motion carried 4 - 0. VII. OLD BUSINESS Bearman stated that he felt something should be done to keep the Planning Commission meetings to a reasonable hour. The Commission had discussion on various ideas proposed to ) keep the agenda items to a minimum. MOTION: Bentley moved, Levitt seconded that the Planner limit the amount of development proposals on the Planning Commission •agenda to four and that if there becomes a back log in devel- opment proposals, the Planning Commission set a special meeting for these proposals. Motion carried 4 - 0. VI I I. NEW BUSINESS - NONE IX. PLANNER'S REPORT - NONE X. ADJOURN[MNT MOTION: Gartner moved, Bentley seconded to adjourn the meeting at 10:20. Motion carried 4 - 0. 9q1 • 10viN 4*, Minnesota Co , ;; a Department of Transportation , '- District Five L 5801 Duluth Street • GP IS Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 (512)545.3761 March 10, 1980 Mr. Chris Enger Planning Director City of Eden Prairie 8950 ::den Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 S.P. 2785-188 TH 494 Review of proposed Viking Office and Training Facility, located in the NW quadrant of TH 494 and Washington Avenue South in Eden Prairie Dear Mr. Eager: We have reviewed the above referenced development and offer the following r comments for consideration. l - As you know, we are presently designing changes for the I-494-CSAH 18 interchange area. These changes include revisions to existing Washington Avenue in the area of the proposed access to this development. Our Detail designer has submitted copies of our proposed plans to your City Engineer. Any proposed entrance.should be designed so that it is compatible with our future changes. - In regard to the frontage road shown on the plat, we suggest that it be constructed westerly to the proposed Ring Road interchange. This would greatly improve traffic circulation in the area. - If any construction for the proposed frontage road encroaches upon our right of way, the developer must obtain a permit from our Golden Valley office before any construction can take place. If you have any questions in regard to these comments, please feel free to contact me at 545-3761 ext. 119. Thank you for your cooperation. 4 Sincerely, Evan R. Green Project Manager ERG:bn qqq An Equal Opportunity Employer STAFF REPORT TO: Manning Commission • FROM: Chris Enger, Planning Director Jean Johnson, Assistant Planner DATE: Feb. 20, 1980 PROJECT: CNR-GOLDEN STRIP EAST PUD & VIKING REZONING APPLICANT: Condon-Naegele Realty Company REQUEST: 1. PUD Concept Plan Approval on 72.9 acres for Office and regional commercial uses 2. Rezoning of 15 acres from Rural & I-2 to Office • for an office and athletic training facility for the Minnesota Vikings 3. Preliminary plat approval of 2 lots. BACKGROUND • Comprehensive Guide Plan The Guide Plan illustrates office, industrial, and public uses over the 72.9 acre site. Industrial is illustrated for the IS acre piece requesting rezoning to office at this time. RC � L f v- r r ---j .. FIG. 1 ! - >` 1 �. ' � 1t. . --.--id _i_ R ----=-�. , O , 'JI4'.‘ :I.cq,' _. '_' - A , Zoning Ftji\ ; As noted in fig. 2 below, the 72.9 acres are presently located in C-Reg, Rural and I-2 Districts. The eastern 11 acres to be zoned to office is ' presently zoned I-2 and Rural. .t -I9 \ Ltom -1 � i : .�/ - ' __ . _ ,,,,,:l REG 1� / `ti 1 C RiTG tk i ;•rir.', 'ill` :4 .` --• - - =_ _ - -l"' s� IT S. Li:!3 3 ' q!� + r-4/ ,�" lir;tr°T .5ptr.l -UFC. l:I:. 242 /�L.r� Y � I .,t•'. 7- -0A ' I I5P}S_,t,.� r--- i .r OFC7 ) ./ I��\\,t� Staff Report-CNR PUD 8 "eking Rezoning -2- Feb.20,1980 -r BACKGROUND, continued Major Center Area Plan, 1973 The MCA Plan depicts 2 multiple housing locations and highway commercial/ regional services uses. The current Guide Plan uses of office and industrial override the 1973 proposed uses of multiple family housing contained in the MCA Plan. Smetana Lake Plan , 1974 The 1974 Smetana Lake Plan describes this area as suitable for industrial and/or office uses with density trade off possible if "the scenic forested sloping . areas and flood plain " are preserved. Condon-Naegele PUD, 1975-76 This PUD submitted in 1975, and approved in 1976 , gave PUD approval for restaurant, hotel and highway service uses ,( this included 4 auto dealerships along I-494) over the western portion of the 165 acre PUD. The remainder of the CNR property ( area lying east of drainage swale, see fig.3), was returned to the developer for refinement. Subsequent rezoning action approved the rezoning to C-Reg-Ser for 24 acres. Although the City's current Zoning Map illustrates C-Reg zoning on the 25 acres west of the proposed Schooner Boulevard, this is a technical error due to an inaccurate legal description. The Council's motion and the proponent's request clearly reflects zoning for the auto dealership sites only. In 1977 the CNR final plat for the western portion of their property along I-494 was approved . The plat contained 3 lots and 6 outlots; two of the outlots were dedicated to the City for ramp right-of-way and one outlot was deeded to the City for park and conservancy purposes. The plat name as filed is "Golden Strip". !� \ 1., Lake e.... ..r•''^'>.�..� . (OL �, ti. : , Smetana • FIG. 3 ,.� : — � . ixc .`4_� 'r •1�,. .»_.• • �� �,,. ... 'off�.L.._J—. •_ l:_1=; • LAND USE CONCEPT 'cavanncwr ro ma revised 1 9 7 5 qt4 • .• • n. r1 • nnnnnnf 1t. rn7nninn '" r3-.'"• r • Staff Report-CNR PUD & Viking Rezoning -3- Feb.20,1980 EXISTING SITE CHARACTER Soils As noted on page 7 of the development brochure and verified through soil borings, the Heyder and Hayden Soils dominating the site are suitable for the construction of office type buildings as outlined by the proponent. Topography • The site is gently rolling with wooded hills rising in the north-central and northeast portions of the site. The site has been previously graded to accommodate a sewer trunk line and an access road which meanders through the Condon-Naegele West PUD and the proposed East PUD. (see Figure 4 ) Vegetation Besides cattail and bullrush being located along the marshland and creek, ( they have also appeared around the sedimentation pond built in conjunction with the sewer trunk line. The most dominate vegetative feature, as noted in the brochure, are the stands of mature red and white oak trees. Preservation of significant oak stands was included in the 1975 PUD, ( see Figure 4 ) in a Rural classifica- tion. This Rural piece was proposed to be retained by the owner. The present plan depicts little retention of the oaks and platting of the Rural piece into Lots 10 & 11 (see figure 5). • Site Plan: Transportation The original 1975 CNR Plan illustrated a road from Washington Avenue west to US 169/212. This road was not approved because of a drainage swale occurring near the center of the site. However, with construction of the auto dealership pads, sedimentation ponds, sanitary sewer line, and removal of Dutch Elm diseased trees, this is no longer a vaild factor. E.A.W. ATso;contained in the original E.A.W. is the preservation of the wooded hill area now depicted for development in the 1980 Plan as Lots 10 and 11. A • ^-:,. r •yam `w•- •/�• �` • �t� Iv ;1 7.•'‘•••••• 1 C2. • /);o /� o � X - 1, \ ` n ,, . ,art .-.. ‘ 1' �1 (D . ;� J z%. '\ice• _ . am -- cp `o r '.� e ,� '�� ^� �•� \ --- it.T` N i:� 1r. x t_'r! 1. a ;--,l ` ' .! ]$ r..N. ����/ Jam, .ems \ Tf .:- � .........1, ,—.. ,t‘\. .. 1 .-:., , '------.-. 1...WF-';'{;(•?%•',"•:IN .(-1( vise li Wy`�\\ ,.. �i�� l\\ 11 • lm I1� rfs• .••,I { 1. .: I .j 41 '•( /ice ��1 ;�� 4 ? tg t• 1� �/�• . i /13,:!? 1.1. ?S m i c S r• 1 (-' .ter ���.c �7' 0-1 1 O`, r , '1 .. // o0 --- 'o60 1.. _ :1� • ' • ....< ,• 1, :t:; Am..: `'• - _'v.•,, Jam. ^ •\• :ri _„_ :D us. .�• Sanitary Sewer — Trunk Line s ?�8 � J =-,3 � I I� Io � .• k, �ji- � ;I L� } p � . . •ix.yl t— • J/ 1 Ail .1 : e, 1� w I.c1 ;o `l, .1 u 1' Y'�j APPROVED1975 PLAN �iy..6 L-- IL_ "•: •" -_:�- FIGURE • .\ • . r 1 in. I t • / \I. ( , , ' .• it '+ `• L . `j .• -\ } f I • j = ... t� t• j �E -- U $ : * d '•e` /• iM ■ 0 t J �� *. ; ■ t; J_•^jam. •. \ r ., t• 1.` q T • , . / .K t ' � . of% ' iv •; -,; iJ l' fig .1• • y.•� ,,//' Ili+ f"��1��.... - { Pi o� . .. { �':l:y/��J- .r�.,�t�{_,r`\ � • ` o II IO8. Noa�a47' ,s': v f _I arQ©� aeoe9 1r3 i�� — � -, . �r D - — - _�..� , 1 ,. _C., !I\tom._-d.,, a to .. ! 1 t. C :' ,•:_ �_�',` )• ..?._._,..:,....:1...;.... ,..., 0 a & fit i �� `11 I�l; t '`� =s-. " _ ' s u s s -. 1J ; 1\ '=_'.`�` ~ .. • ,0 1- I ' ._ -te-ri OSED PLAN :l ;\-*.=- Wit: _ i Z— j , I t s - 14 t _ - • • • �• m r t�'c/ �, v � t .. I Z - — \J k L 1 } a _� - } Cwol a �' t� y j ,3 a a n , \_ ? Z 0 i • -� I �' t }l�V 1 D — ti 1 i , + •�t—`� • "-=-+ L t='' •_.V. \< t'' ''t' I• . — 1/ Jm1tN•cris ' ' k• . i 's '.'U, 1 _e i 1 t.�;I' ., . ..,..,- • ;:,.1`r;.�T//./ram/',v, j�\jl CO u •., go -,- - ,<-,,�� ue ;i °_ D _ f co ' i os w- IRN: �� ".-1 -i 3 -- �i IA • I taaa �'' 1J ` �' - 1✓ • • 1� p'POSED PLAN t 1' J S —;;`-rtrttDC [ Staff Report-CNR PUO 8 Viking Rezoning -4- Feb.20,1980 Surrounding Land Uses On the north portion of the PUO is an overhead transmission line and Nine Mile Creek. North of Nine Mile Creek are scattered residential homes and mining pits which are foreseen as future industrial and high density residential areas. Directly south of the PUO, across I-494, is the Bachman Anderson Office site which is currently under construction. To the west of this office site is the Gelco Corporation which presently includes 1 existing office structure, 1 office structure under construction, and future building plans for 3 •additional buildings. East of the PUO, across Washington Avenue, is the City of Bloomington. Presently a small number of residential homes exist along Washington Avenue, but the future intended use according to Bloomington's Guide Plan is for office develop- ment. West of the proposed CNR East PUO proposed is the approved 1975-76 PUD by Condon-Naegele as described on page 2 of this report. ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Shoreland Management Ordinance Smetana Lake is classified as - Recreational Waters. Nine Mile Creek is General Oevelopment Waters. Requirements for both are listed below. Recreational Waters General Oev. Waters a. Lots must have public sewer. a. Lots must have public sewer. b. 10 acre minimum lot size. b. 40,000 sq.ft. minimum lot size.. c. 200 foot minimum setback from the c. 150 foot minimum setbaci from the Normal Ordinary High Water Mark, Normal Ordinary High Water Mark. The proposed Viking Office and training facility meets the above requirements. ORDINANCE 135: Office District minimum lot width 100 feet maximum height of structure 30 feet minimum lot depth 100 feet F.N.R. 30% for 1 story 50% for multiple story front yard setback 35 feet rear yard setback 20 feet parking- 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet side setbacks 20:50 feet G.F.A. • • ��� r Staff Report-CNR PUD & Rezoning -5- Feb. 20,1980 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET The Minnesota Environmental Quality Council at a December, 1975 meeting reviewed a E.A.W. on the CNR 165 acre development and determined that an Environmental Impact Statement(E.I.S.) was not required. Therefore, no additional E.A.W. is mandatory unless uses contrary to those contained in the 1975 E.A.W. are proposed or unless environmental effects, other than those covered in the E.A.W.,are discovered. The,15 acre site requesting rezoning to Office was depicted in the 1975 E.A.W. as industrial lots ranging from 2-3 acres in size. The proposed Viking Office and training facility would be expected to have less impact upon the site and surrounding facilities than 3-4 industrial sites would have produced. CASH PARK FEE ' a The City approval of the 1975 CNR Western PUD & rezoning accepted land in lieu of cash park fee payment. ' Since the early days of the City's cash park fee ordinance in 1975, a subsequent ordinance (78-229) has been adopted and is applicable to this project. • The CNR Golden Strip East PUD offers 5.2 acres of land ,(located between the centerline of Nine Mile Creek and the 100 year flood plain elevation of 833),for dedication to the City. This dedication is acceptable to the City but does not constitute land in lieu of cash park fee payment as it occurs within a flood plain. Therefore, the owner may retain the flood plain portion in his ownership, or dedicate the land to the City in the form of a charitible donation(gift). First phase development of the CNR East PUD, the Viking rezoning&adjacent 4 acres, will be subject to cash park fee payment at time of building permit issuance. Presently, the amount applicable to office uses is $1,4OO per acre. a5)% Staff Report-CNR E.PUD & Viking Rezoning • -6- Feb. 20, 1980 ( RECOMMENDATIONS The staff recommends approval of the rezoning to Office District and preliminary plat approval of two lots on the 15acres subject to the following: 1. The plan be reviewed and approved by the Nine Mile Watershed District. 2. The public road be built according to City Engineering standards to the property's western boundary. 3. The plan be according to the specific site plans submitted and �. dated Feb. 15, 1980. 4. Any substantial change in the site plan of either Lot I or Lot 2 be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. 5. The area shown as preservation on Fig. 10 of the development brochure (2-80), Fig.5 of report , be protected from any grading or construction. 6. That grading be limited to Lots 1,2,and 3 until further approvals. 7. That cash park fee payment of $1,400/acre be paid at time of building permit issuance. l The staff recommends returning the PUD Concept, exclusive of the eastern 15 acres, to the proponent for the following revisions: 1. The original 1975 submission for PUD approval of Condon-Naegele's entire 165 acre parcel illustrated a road through the.property from C.S.A.H.#18 to U.S. 169. Since much of the current 73 acre eastern half of the original PUD is now being requested for office use, and since in the future there will be "in-only" access from Co.Rd.#18, it is critical that this road be continued through. Without this through connection , development and traffic circulation may be hampered for years by two half mile long cul-de-sacs. 1 An analagous situation would be cul-de-sacing West 78th Street from both directions in front of Gelco on the south side of I-494. A connection north across Nine Mile Creek to a future Valley View Road and a connection south across I-494 to West 78th Street will still be valuable to the total transportation system but does not eliminate the logical connection from east to west of the Condon-Naegele property. 2. The original PUD and Environmental Assessment Worksheet showed Lots 10 & 11 as being preserved. "The second area of preservation (the first being the flood plain and adjacent slopes) will be the approxi- mate 8 acre forested hill in the center of the project. 953 Staff Report-CNR E. PUD & Viking Rezoning -7- Feb. 20, 1980 The hill is of great scenic beauty and contains an oak overstory with a basswood understory. It is basically undisturbed forest of a caliber increasingly rare in the Metro Area. This area will remain in the ownership of CNR as a Rural outlot".( page 39 Condon Naegele Realty Company Environmental Assessment Worksheet) The Planning Staff believes that this is still a valuable physical amenity of the site but that the current PUD proposal plans elimination of this woods and hill form rather than preservation of it. The road system and " parcelization should be redone in order to allow this to occur as a preserved amenity as a part of a larger office site. 3. The retention of two office warehouse sites seems incompatible with the high quality character of office park that this area has the potential to be. • CE:jj • q51/ MEMORANDUM ( TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: March 13, 1980 SUBJECT: Development Proposal Check List PROJECT: CNR-Golden Strip East PUD f, Viking Rezoning PROPONENT: Condon-Nacgele Realty Co. REQUEST: 1. PUD Concept Plan Approval on 72.9 acres for office and reg. commercial uses, 2. Rezoning of:15 acres from Rural and I-2 to Office for office and training facility, 3. Preliminary plat approval of 2 lots. LOCATION: Nest of Washington Ave, north of 494 BACKGROUND: See Planning Staff Report CHECKLIST: • 1. Adjacent to parks? (Neighborhood, Community, Regional) Conservation Area Affect on park: The floodplain of Nine-Mile Creek is a proposed conservation area and open space trail corridor. 2. Adjacent to public waters? Nine-Mile Creek Affect on waters: Proposed trail system includes a future trail along • 3. Adjacent to trails? Nine-Mile Creek. Pedestrian Type of trails: (bike, multi-use, transportation, etc.) wood chips Construction: (asphalt, concrete, wood chips, aglime) Width: . Party Responsible for construction? City dedicated Landownership: (dedicated, density tradeoff, etc.) Type of Development? (residential, commercial, industrial) office community park and trail developmen• Where will CASH PARK FEE go? (what neighborhood) No Need for a mini-park? _2_ S. REFERENCE CHECK: a. Major Center Area Study: S„e page 2 of February 20. 19S0 Planning Staff Report. b. Neighborhood Facilities Study:No specific recommendation c. Purgatory Creek Study: N/A • d. Shoreland Management Ordinance: See Planning Staff Report e. Floodplain Ordinance: The floodplain ordinance is in effect regarding fill, etc. f. Guide Plan: See Planning Staff Report g. Other: Smetana Lake Plan - 1974, recommend preservation of "the scenic -( forested sloping areas and floodplain", through desity trade-offs if possible. 6. Existing or pending assessments or taxes on proposed park property: N/A • 7. CASH PARK FEE? The applicable Cash Park Fee should be paid - see page S of Planning Staff Report 8. Adjacent neighborhood type, and any neighborhood opinion voiced in favor or against proposal: 9. Number of units in residential development? N/A Number of acres in the project? 79 acres with PUD, 15 acres within proposed plat. Special recreation space requirements: N/A 10. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Community Services Staff recommends approval of the rezoning and preliminary plat request as per Planning Staff Report of Feb. 20, 1980, and returning the PUD concept plan request to the proponent for the revisions recommended in the Planning Staff Report. 93 1•:inuten —'Parks, Recreation & unapproved March 17, 1980 Natural Resources Commission —3- 2. Comnrehe^.rive Park Plan MOTION: Tangen moved to recommend to the Council acceptance of the plan and to defer comments on it until the Comnisson has a chance to review it. Table this to next meeting. D. Anderson seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. 3. Tree Disease Propram Lambert reviewed Stuart Fox's memo of March 13, 1990 clarifying some of the concerns the Council expressed. The Council has con— oerns regarding alternatives to chipping (ie. locating a buyer for the raw wood) and expanded cost estimates for a chipping site. 4. Reforestation Program Lambert presented a memo from Stuart Fox dated March 13, 1980, on the City's current reforestation program as requested by the Commission from the last meeting. R. Anderson asked if the City couldn't plant more trees in open park spaces such as at Bryant Lake Park. As long as the City has its own nursery stock available, these open spaces could be reforested on a planned basis. 1b. C):R —Golden Strip East PUD & Viking Rezoning Don Brauer arrived and reviewed the project. The Vikings are asking for approval of rezoning of Lot 1 and Lot 2 per Planning Report. Brauer pointed out to the Commission that the interchange at 494 and 18 is ready for bid. •The plan is for all 4 ramps to be combined with service roads. Brauer said that a bridge across 494 has been brought up before and now is even more important in providing an alternate way to cross 494 other than the interchange. Due to the elevations where the bridge is proposed, it would be most practical to go under 494 (grade needs to be down 40 feet ). Brauer showed that the Vikings plan to build 2 full size football fields, 1 smaller covered practice field and administration building on the 2 lots. As a point of information to the Commission he mentioned the Vikings are asking for deed restrictions on the property to the west so no high buildings can be put up to infringe on the privacy of Viking practices. R. Anderson asked how much of the rather substantial hill on lots 1 and 2 will be altered for the football fields. Brauer said that the fields fall between the hill and the western lot line. R. Anderson also asked; (1) how much of the floodplain to the north would be infringed upon, and; (2) what will happen to all the soil graded out in construction of the fields. Brauer replied; (1) only 300 sq.ft. of the floodplain to the north would be encroached upon, and; (2) the roil will balance out between the high and low )ands and the substantial privacy berm being created at the western line. °O • • Einutes -Parks, Recreation & unapproved barch 17, 1930 Natural Resources Commission -4- I R. Anderson asked if the future trail system along Hine D:ile Creek had been taken into consideration as the tine to consider this is at the time of development. Lambert replied that the trail location has not been firmly established as yet ic. what ride of the creek it will be on, but there is plenty of allowance for it. R. Anderson pointed out that this is a prime wildlife habitat area and he encourages Commission members to go and look at the area before development occurs. ' 11OTI0::: D. Anderson moved to recommend to the Council the rezoning' ' of Vikings site Lot 1 and Lot 2, of approximately 15 acre:, per Planning Staff recommeadation. B. Anderson seconded the motion. • M UD!ENT: Tangen amended the motion to return the PUD to developer to reconsider recommendations in planning staff report for the western end, and before it comes up for approval bring this back before the Commission. R. Anderson seconded the amendment and the original motion carried unanimously. 1c. Tudor Oaks Retirement Community Brauer is representing the new owners and corporation which has permits to build, 13I0 Holdings Inc. They have satisfied all liens on the property and are clear owners. The active partners ti of the group from Toronto (ABIO Holdings, Inc.) are D. Crashley, D. Owen, and S. McLaughlin. • -Brauer pointed out that the change in ownership brought about a change in concept from a life care (no ownership) concept, to a condominium (ownership) concept. Because of ownership rights, now there is a need to place lots "where before there was not. Brauer said that many organizations have been contacted, but • Ebenezer Society will most likely operate this facility. Referring to the Application for Preliminary Plat Approval, Brauer said Outlot B (4.07 acres) represents the encroachment into the floodplain and there is a possibility of additional dwelling units here at some future time. Tangen asked if changing the concept to condominium ownership lifted the 62 minimum ace limit. If so, will the recreational plans change to accommodate younger age. Brauer said the age minimum will be lifted and yes the whole recreation picture should be re-evaluated. 110T10'I: T._ncen moved to recommend to the Council approval of Tudor Oaks Retirement Co:.aznity per Planning Staff Report. 1). Anderson seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. 5. Council Rcaort 3/d/80 Lambert reported on the following: 1) Hired architects Smiley Clotter Associates • 2) Approved bids to.: grading of Starring Lake Park and Flying Cloud Balifields. 95Y Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes -4- January 28, 1980 . i Sauer stated that it is important for the church to proceed 9 becuase of the availability of funding from their parent ( synod. Levitt inquired if when approving the Eagle Enterpirse pro- ject there were any contingencies as to the construction of this frontage road. Tom Walters,6780 Meadow Lane stated that he had researched the minutes regarding the Eagle Enterprise project in preparation for this meeting and felt that there were no contingencies regarding the service road. The Planner responded that Eagle Enterprises approval was made • contingent upon the extension of the service road across the front of their property to the east boundary of the church. Martinson inquired if Mr. Sauer has talked to Lance Norderhus recently. -Sauer replied that they have talked to him and Mr. Norderhus currently drawing up a document for the easement. MOTION: Bentley moved, Martinson seconded that the Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the site plan for Christ Lutheran Church dated 1/20/80, per the staff report ' dated 1/25/80 specifically contingent upon an ultimate agree- ( ment acceptable to the City on the building of the service road and that an agreement be reached on the timing and the reponsibility of this service road prior to building permit issuance. Motion carried 4 - 1. (Bearman voting nay). Bearman stated that he felt that it was the responsibility of the church to get this road built. D. REQUEST TO GIVE A PRESENTATION of up-coming Viking Football team proposal. Don Brauer, planner for the Vikings, gave a brief presentation on what is planned for this Viking team facility. He explained the location of this proposed site and the type of preservation and grading they have planned for the site. Grady Alderman, Viking's project director, stated that one of the reasons this location was selected was because of the privacy it provides. He explained that they plan to construct • two fullsize practice fields, 'a 70-yard-long field of arti- ficial turf that in cold weather could be covered by an air- supported plastic bubble, and a building that will be an office and training facility. He explained that the building would have training facilities on the first floor and offices on the second and that the Vikings are looking into the possibility of part of the building being earth sheltered and solar heated. 75 i : Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes -S- January 28, 1980 Bentley inquired in relation to this project where the ring road was. Brauer explained that it was proposed for the western third of the Condon-Naegele piece. Bearman inquired if the on-ramp from Washington Avenue on to 494 would affect the proposed site. The Planner replied that MnDot had not planned an on ramp from Washington Ave to 1-494 westbound. Levitt inquired if Washington Ave is the main access to this site. Brauer stated that Washington Avenue will be the main access to this site until they can get the other through roads built. Levitt inquired what was planned for the surrounding property. Brauer stated that for the present they are planning to leave it rural. V. OLD BUSINESS • NONE VI. NEW BUSINESS NONE VII. PLANNER'S REPORT NONE VIII. ADJOURNEMNT MOTION: Bentley moved, Gartner seconded to adjourn the meeting at 9:30. Motion carried S - 0. • 7�Q • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO 80-65 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIPMINARY PLAT OF VIKING OFFICE AND ADJOINING LOT BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as.follows: That the preliminary plat of Viking Office site and adjoining lot dated Feb.,1980 , a copy of which is attached hereto and amended as follows: is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances and amendments thereto and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of 19 • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor John D. Frane, City Clerk 4 SEAL 461 • Planning Commission Minutes -3- March 10, 1980 i • MOTION: Bentley moved, Levitt seconded to recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat dated February 20, 1980 according to the staff report dated February 20, 1980 provided that the Public Safety Department submit their opinion - of lengthy cul-de-sacs and that detailed grading plans be sub- mitted prior to City Council review. Motion carried 4 - 0. B. TUDOR OAKS, by ABIO Holdings - Mn inc. Development stage approval of the P.U.D. to include preliminary platting of 44 acres into 3 lots and 2 outtots. Brauer gave a brief presentation explaining;the changes in this project, what the developer is requesting at this time, the road systems, and the construction timing. The Commission had general concerns on the proposed access on to Schooner Boulevard, the proposed road, the garage setbacks, the possibility of signalization on 169/212, and the devel- opers ideas for the southeastern portion of this site and outlot B. The Planner went over the recommendation of the staff report dated February-21, 1980 and the MnDOT Letter dated February 27, 1970. MOTION: Levitt moved, Bentley seconded to close the public hearing. Motion carried 4 - 0. MOTION: Levitt moved, Bentley seconded to recommend to the City Council approval of.the Tudor Oaks preliminary plat dated December 15, 1979 per the staff report dated February 21, 1980 and the recommendations of the MnDOT letter dated February 27, • 1980. Motion carried 4 - 0. VII. LD BUSINESS Bearman stated that he felt something should be done to keep the Planning Commission meetings to a reasonable hour. { The Commission had discussion on various ideas proposed to keep the agenda items to a minimum. MOTION: Bentley moved, Levitt seconded that the Planner limit the amount of development proposals on the Planning Commission •agenda to four and that if there becomes a back log in devel- opment proposals, the Planning Commission set a special meeting for these proposals. Motion carried 4 - 0. VI II. NEW BUSINESS - NONE IX. PLANNER'S REPORT - NONE X. ADJOURNEMNT MOTION: Gartner moved, Bentley seconded to adjourn the meeting at 10:20. Motion carried 4 - 0. 9Ga 1 Co �tNK�9 o 6. Minnesota Department of Transportation • District 5 2055 No. Lilac Drive "roF roe Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422. February 27, 1980 (012)545•3761 Mr. Chris Enger Planning Director • Eden Prairie City Hall • 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 • I In Reply Refer To: 315 S.P. 2744 T.H. 169 Plat review of Tudor Oaks located in the j southwest quadrant of TH 169 and Schooner Boulevard in part of the north half of the southwest quarter of Section 14, Township 116, Range 22, 1 City of Eden Prairie, Hennepin County , 4 Dear Mr. Enger: i t We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance l; with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. We find the i ( plat acceptable for further development with consideration of the following : ? comments: I — We anticipate State and Federal noise standards will be exceeded adjacent to TH 169. The development should be planned in such a way '• 1 that the effects from this are minimized. It should be noted that Mn/DOT will not provide any type of noise attenuation for new develop— 1 ments adjacent to trunk highways. — Our copy of the plat did not indicate future access to Lot 1. It should I. be noted we presently have controlled access along TH 169 and Lot 1 will , have to be served from Schooner Boulevard. It is important that this 1 •future access be located far enough from TH 169 so as not to interfere i ; with future signalization. As you know, TH 169 carries a high volume of traffic through this area. As this development and others are constructed adjacent to TH 169 the importance C of preserving the safety and traffic carrying capabilities of the highway will t greatly increase. This plat should be coordinated with any future plans for 1 development of land south of this parcel so as not to restrict future solutions for anticipated problems on TH 169. For example, the City should think about the following questions: I . tt 1. Where should the next main intersection on TM 169 be located? i 2. Are frontage roads needed along TH 169 to serve adjacent properties? Should these frontage roads be connected to the existing (Schooner Boulevard) or future local streets? An Equal Opportunity Employer 0 963 • Mr. Chris Eager February 27, 1980 Page 2 _ 3. How will the proposed local streets, which are a part of each individual development, fit together and provide adequate access to TH 169? 4. Can all direct access to TH 169 be eliminated and provided via local streets? We would like to suggest the City prepare a guide plan that would address 2�2 the above questions and others that may arise, for the area adjacent to TH 169 I` between Schooner Boulevard and the north entrance to the Vocational-Education Center. A plan such as this would provide an important step to preserve the 1 • safety and operating integrity of the existing highway. It would help avoid • similar situations such as the one that exists at the Vocational-Education Center entrance. We would be glad to provide you with any existing and future highway plans, right of way maps, suggestions for intersection spacing, estimated right of way needs and other items which might be helpful to develop such a guide plan. • If you have any questions in regard to the above comments, please contact our District Layout, Research and Development Engineer Mr. J. S. Katz at 545-3761 extension 150 or Evan Green on extension 119. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. • Sinca el 1(;) ./ W. M. Crawford, P. District Engineer .1 cc: Charles Weaver Metropolitan Council Gary Backer Hennepin County Surveyor's Office • 9G4 • a STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jean Johnson, Assistant Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: Feb. 21, 1980 PROJECT: Tudor Oaks Platting & Development Stage Amendment APPLICANT: AB1O Holdings, Inc. REQUEST: 1. Preliminary plat approval of 3 lots and • 3 outlots 2. PUD Development Stage amendment to allow a 0 lot line setback between Lots 2 & 3. 3. Variances: a. parking within a front yard for Lot 3 b. garage location in a front yard setback on Lot 3 c. 0 lot line setback for Lots 2 & 3 f' BACKGROUND In 1977 Covenant Livings Centers, Inc. (Minnesota) received rezoning approval on 44 acres to construct the following: Phase 1 240 apartments, 60 skill care units Phase 2 96 apartments Phase 3 60±duplex/quad units Phase 4 60nursing care units No approval was given to the 2 acre site adjacent to US 169/212 which requested commercial zoning. Construction began on the 240 apartments and 60 skill care units, but haulted in late 1978 due to financial reasons. Since then the project has been up for sale. REQUEST The proposed developer, AB10 Holdings Minnesota, Inc., is requesting the City to approve a preliminary plat& allow a 0 lot line setback. The plat as proposed contains: 2 acre Rural zoned lot next to US 169/212, a 3.53 acre lot zoned RM 2.5 for skilled care units, a 10.6 acre lot zoned RM 2.5 for apartment and condominum units,'a 4 acre outlot zoned RM 6.5 for future duplex and quadraminium units, Outlot A as road ,and Outlot C 23 acres of flood plain which may be improved for recreational uses. 2 acres Rural Zoning LOT 1: Lot 1 was excepted from PUD and zoning approval in 1977. Todate it is of adequate size to accommodate residential multiple, office, institutional, or small scale commercial. However, the preliminary plat proposed does not indicate how access would be provided to the site, internal connection to lot 2 , adequate setback lines from US 169/212, or type of use. Therefore the City Staff withholds review and recommenda- tion on Lot 1 and recommends it be platted as an outlot. Staff Report-Tudor Oaks Plat & Amendment -2- Feb. 21, 1980 LOR _ 3.53 acres RM 2.5 Zoning Proposed use of Lot 2 is for skilled care units with 20 parking spaces. Proper setbacks from lot lines have been met from the front, rear, and one side. On the other side a 0 lot line setback is requested. Covenants, cross-easements, etc., are being reviewed by the City Attorney to insure the proper instruments are drafted. LOT 3 10.6 acres RM 2.5 Zoning The building upon Lot 3 meets setbacks except on the east side where it also requires a 0 lot line setback. The garages along the western lot line show parking spaces on the west side of the garage, not the east side(interior to project) as was approved in the original plan. Also, the northern most garage infringes upon proper setback from the road(discussed under Outlot A). Parking spaces as depicted between the road and the garages is more aesthetically pleasing when considering the views from the building, but not from the roadway, and will require a variance. Walkways from the buildings to the garages and parking spaces are depicted in the proponent's material and appear adequate, but require walking a long- er distance to parking and a sharp drop of 10 feet(nessitating steps), than if the parking had been constructed along the east side of the garages. The garage along the south side of the building does not show any outside parking. OUTLOT A • Roadway 50 feet right-of-way • The road was envisioned as a private drive in the 1977 PUD. The proposed plat depicts the road as a 50 foot right-of-way with 26 foot surface connecting to Schooner Boulevard and deadending temporarily at the prop- erty 's southern boundary. The road's intbrsection with Schooner Boulevard occurs approximately 150 feet from the centerline of Common Wealth (serving The Preserve Commercial Addition ) and therefore meets the minimum setback distance between intersections. The 100 foot right-of-way depicted at the road's southern terminous will provide for temporary turnaround, but may not be needed if the road is continued southward to serve other properties. The garages within Lot 3 are all setback from the road right-of-way a distance of 50 feet except for the northern most garage which is within 18 feet of the road. Engineering Staff review of the Outlot A road connection with Schooner Boulevard raises some concerns. If the road were accepted,Schooner Boulevard would have to be improved to its intersection with Outlot A and design of a frontage road • Tudor Oaks Plat & Amendment -3- Feb.21,1980 CO )T B. 4 acres RM 6.5 Zoning The developer states at this time development of this lot is unknown , but may be submitted for a higher density approval than originally planned. The lot configuration does not lend itself to easy development and it may be difficult to site buildings and parking without future requests for variances. At this time the staff does not have a recommendation on the use of Outlot B as no uses are proposed, but does wish to make the developer aware that the site as designed will be difficult to develop and subject to review under applicable flood plain rules and regulations, and City ordinances. OUTLOT C: 22.8 acres RM 6.5 Zoning Floodplain The area received zoning approval contingent upon all building to be confined to area outside of the flood plain. Uses proposed for this area in the 1977 PUD were: garden plots, golf, walkways, picnic facilities, etc. Presently the City and Watershed District are reviewing landowners`request to have the flood plain elevation in this area lowered. ( RECOMMENDATIONS: This is part of a P.U.D. Development Stage approval and subject to review of condominium documents by the City Attorney to assure proper legal structure exists to accommodate the zero lot line request. The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the preliminary plat dated Dec. 15, 1979 and the variances requested subject to the following: 1. That construction upon Lots 2 and 3 be as depicted on the preliminary plat. 2. That Lot 1 be final platted as an outlot. 3. That owner must demonstrate to City that Outlot A roadway will adequately meet City engineering standards and that the front • yard setback to parking be waived for existing parking and garages only, prior to requesting City accept] said road as a public street. 4. That owner agrees to extend Schooner Boulevard,and realign the project's private drive if determined necessary by the City Engineer. 5. That future development upon Outlots 8 and C must be returned to City Commissions and Council for review and approval. 6. That access be granted to the property to the South. JJ:j j 9b- . • ( 1 ... -f: 7, . .• .• • . , .• p• . ., •••,.... ...c. 3..;; 1...„ • >. f.---. e z ,--;,- . ,.,}1 • . - • i ... .0 / 'k--'''•,--...1,,t=i,t,,t''::!'...j \' •••. - : / z:•..-,-.`b'if''•1J..• • • ,./ . .,:••j). :TiAZ .: . • 1 • \\\ . /.,„.. ..4sy,, 5 1 !) ....... ,. 1 • ...14,r1 .... : ; • \wilp • q ___111 ..- ' i Ili :. 84 • cr ...i I 0 i .0 cz,,)`‘•0 LU : M . o' ' .1\l' °C1- :-)'\\* at,c0 ' P. - \ c 0 \ c \oc,. 000, q%8P.4sigs -,z,-) LU \ I ? A .4) 1.._ /j ..--" ,'-‘ 0'CO, = • \ 4v N., , ...---- --1--)\ •••"., = i \\0 cse'Ci rj---D165(6. 1 -‘el LU g, • c3 ._( .• ' 0 a p 0 .--`—..g_C?_(--' . • fl 0 . . . - • K3I > Cl dii • lit . ,, z t t - • 5 • i • . . — 1..t_Ji i ---a •""" - .t..., . &- 8 i 3 • •—• 13 Cee . qta 4 fl'77 A nnr-34(11/I-11 oI1i7. rIf AM ,... „ ........ ..-,..: . . •gg 1i“.11.f.2 '- . . -g iElgt:il .Sig. i:& ..--- 1— ••4 i '? i ig711:' :1:i7iizl! 4.1 .• .:: I, - 1:. pi:::::i.: Eilt:z!,:i.: r, • , . -.7 z ..:ff: n'!! !....: . 1 f.1":::t• " "::..r t..... 05„ .; t ,.4'.1 t ' "'If" •"1:1!°'.."t° t . ..•" "•;".*::"'" ...t-::::.7.2 : ".., .. ,..1; ..12.t:.! :.....z:•t i Zt .:: : t• •-I •:1-....,":.7.t.:7::1* . . /• i Mr e'l ::11!ig:ill4-'.1t2:!t: .1:!-ra-t.i III:li:j.i 1 E::.•il,- aiel..i....:. .40)•@ It :! . ....-.1 ..f.r7:;_:“:.,;1.4:: I N •. _ '".1.3-- ' •:1 1- " -'1,1::•ii!::!;:i4 114-•zt A.! ' • '11 f,:i 114:7' - ... -.tg.•4 • , .,•/-eq:N-..- k>., No • / 1415' hieq: .e ifi:: I1114;i!--- i t ........ ‘•11.'r 3 A .' ..._.,..\Z••\\. .. „...0.....si• . • X>.,..,..Z.t. ..../,ti---, ,t, ,<-.1. 4..,,,, • r••-•-f.L ----t•- - z • , / ftl. 7'1 1111 tIri t%r. ,-;:,,,--„,.--...t1t.. Q. 404; I, i i,..- iii a.; ..• z,6 t -. .:.; f>V , -.....„........./ 7• .., • jCf.I ! ;1!.; 4.11F.;:li::•.-i:ii;t1tal . 1 CO t.ti_ Z " .y / . ---- \'• Piug .../ '` :-. ,..• - -_-__ --- '•'•%,.. t (1/7(1,:; •••" •11' "•:•11t1,.."_ ."'") .11.ti ' °P , '.-N\ 1-1 -12. • ___..., 4, 04 1 ..: J. . ••••'...: - .10*- .;--11 - c .. • ,--0- '..•••-.. . '-- i i . *Di> : :.•'••%',,\.., I lti Z:14. , < ( . • -- N ,4 , ,--.:_ ...------ -....\,\ N .....\.„ . ---\ to. „.\,. .1 ,„ \ , ,,.‘ r_ F.-ti .; • N, • . _ it. .._. (/ . \ .•I/ 7-1 i >i -----0 .,,s .. ,•,,,•,,— \\•,-.\''4"'"-- N i:14-4 ' '"\'', . `- ,:,•," ,_ ----- ________:._-,----.....>. --...:--,•-..„,-.71-_ I_ [--------‘NN, ' N'is• \.-- *-.___ -",--- .. " -:,.., " - • 1 •-•,-,.--,-7.-"", ...,., -._•-->"-. - .L , . ,., N ,N. "..... ..'''' '''..1\:." ''- .'"---._------,.._r•-•-•:---': ...-----.T7 , ' ,n. A''' .-''----__".."' -- • N°11‘ `'-' *.-.1":„:.. •-•-;„.„- •9:4,--...„ ..,-,---___--r--;-, -•'.,-• .,..,. >--..• -•::,:„... ....N: :___. ......,:,......f..-• .... .......";/' .1 N''''. ,_.'---..-.-- -----2,:•_:,---Z,:f-":-..:'- e • \••.., , --- - \ x ,....f ...._ _________ •, ...., N. 0 .7 i _I 1 ...„ ----....., ,,..........., -_ --- ----- I • 14 I ---"---•-•,....1 ::. i1 • ... . I V . I, I . J Cy i-tiel .1 t Z ... .. I 0 Pi gip') L 1980 PROPOSED PLAN • • MFMORANDUM • ( TO; Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: March 13, 1980 SUBJECT: Development Proposal Check List PROJECT: Tudor Oaks PROPONENT: AB10 Holdings Inc. REQUEST: Preliminary plat approval for 3 lots, PUD amendment to allow 0 lot line setback between lots 2 $ 3, and variances as described in Planning Staff Report. LOCATION West of 169 across from the Eden Prairie Center BACKGROUND: See Planning Staff Report CHECKLIST: Conservation Area ( 1. Adjacent to parks? (Neighborhood, Community, Regional) Affect on park: The Purgatory Creek floodplain is a designated conservation and open space area. 2. Adjacent to public waters? Purgatory'Creek floodplain Affect on waters: 3. Adjacent to trails? Proposed sidewalk along Schooner Blvd. multi-use Type of trails: (bike, multi-use, transportation, etc.) concrete Construction: (asphalt, concrete, wood chips, aglime) Width: 5', Party Responsible for construction? City (assessed) Landownership: (dedicated, density tradeoff, etc.) R.O.W. Type of Development? (residential. commercial, industrial)residential Where will CASH PARK FEE go? (what neighborhood) N/A Preserve PUD Need for a mini-park? No 970 • , -2- 5. REFERENCE CHECK: a. Major Center Area Study: Protection and enhancement of many of the low open spaces to provide for adequate drainage and as visual open space will be benefical. b. Neighborhood Facilities Study: N/A c. Purgatory Creek Study: Marsh vegetation has become monotype and is of no • great significance, ideal use would be development of a shallow wildlife flowage. Should be retained as a major open space area within the M.C.A. d. Shoreland Management Ordinance: N/A e. Floodplain Ordinance: Ordinance is in effect in this proposal. f. Guide Plan: Shows this area as high density residential. 1 g. Other: 6. Existing or pending assessments or taxes on proposed park property: 7. CASH PARK FEE? N/A Preserve PUD 8. Adjacent neighborhood type, and any neighborhood opinion voiced in favor or against proposal: 9. Number of units in residential development? N/A • Number of acres in the project? 44 acres Special recreation space requirements: Previous PUD approval included requirements. 10. STAFF RF.COM NDA'E)ONS: Recommend approval as per Planning Staff recommendation.• i q91 Minutes -Parks, Recreation & unapproved }larch 17, 1930 Natural Resources Commission -Q- R. Anderson asked if the future trail system along Nine rile Creek had been taken into consideration as the time to consider this is at the time of development. Lambert replied that the trail location has not been firmly established as yet ic. what ride of the creek it will be on, but there is plenty of allowance for it. R. Anderson pointed out that this is a prime wildlife habitat • area and he encourages Commission members to go and look at the area before development occurs. J30TION: D. Anderson moved to recommend to the Council the rezoning of Vikings site Lot 1 and Lot 2, of approximately 15 acre:,per Planning Staff recommendation. R. Anderson seconded the motion. APE1D?•',"NT: Tangen amended the motion to return the PUD to developer to reconsider recommendations in planning staff report for the western end, and before it comes up for approval bring this back before the Commission. R. Anderson seconded the amendment and the original motion carried unanimously. 1c. Tudor Oaks Retirement Community Brauer is representing the new owners and corporation which has permits to build, A3I0 Holdings Inc. They have satisfied all liens on the property and are clear owners. The active partners of the group from Toronto (ARID Holdings, Inc.) are D. Crashley, D. Owen, and S. foLaughlin. Brauer pointed out that the change in ownership brought about a change in concept from a life ,are (no ownership) concept, to a oondominium (ownership) concept. Because of ownership rights, now there is a need to place lots where before there was not. Brauer said that many organizations have been contacted, but Ebenezer Society will most likely operate this facility. Referring to the Application for Preliminary Plat Approval, Brauer said Outlot B (4.07 acres) represents the encroachment into the floodplain and there is a possibility of additional dwelling units here at some future time. Tangen asked if changing the concept to condominium ownership lifted ' the 62 minimum age limit. If so, will the recreational plans change to accommodate younger age. Brauer said the age minimum will be lifted and yes the whole recreation picture should be re-evaluated. IIOTIO : Tangen moved to recommend to the Council approval of Tudor Oaks Retirement Community per Planning Staff Report. D. Anderson seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. 5. Council Rnaort 3/4/S0 Lambert reported on the following: 1) Hired architects Smiley Clotter Associates 2) Approved bids for Grading of Starring Lake Park and Flying Cloud Ballfields. 991 • • • • f! MEMO TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer • DATE: March 25, 1980 SUBJECT: I.C. 51-359 Public Hearing The feasibility report for this project was presented to the Council on February 19, 1980. Copies of the report were mailed along with the hearing notice to the property owners involved. We will have extra copies of the report available at the hearing. CJJ:kh • • • • • • • • , April 1, 1980 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. R80-69 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS (I.C. 51-359) WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 19th day of February, 1980, fixed the 1st day of May, 1980, as the date for a public hearing on the following proposed improvements. I.C. 51-359, Watermain, street and storm drainage improvements on W. 78th St. extended, Norseman Industrial Park 4th WHEREAS, all property owners whose property is liable to be assessed for the making of this improvement were given ten days published notice of the Council hearing through two weekly publications of the re- quired notice and the hearing was held and property owners heard on the 1st day of April, 1980. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such improvement as above indicated is hereby ordered. 2. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for this project and is hereby directed to prepare plans and speci- fications for the making of such improvement, with the assist- ance of Rieke Carroll Muller Assoc., Consulting Engineers. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on —0-fgang H.•Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL I John D. Frane, Clerk • LAW OFFICES THOMPSON, NIELSEN, KLAVERKAMP 61 JAMES A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION BRucE F.THOMPSON 4444 IOS CENTER D.JAMES NIEISEN ( BRUCE W.OLACHOURN 80 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET a,LUL N,Kl/,vCRKAMP MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55402 GnuNE O.JAMES TELEPHONE GRANT J.MERRITT RICHARD J.KEENAN 10121 330-4540 R.D.ESTES ROGER A.JOHNSON ✓OMN D.PARSINEN DONALD P.NORWICH RICHARO MASSOPUST,JR. ✓OSEPH ALEXANDER March 20, 1980 RICHARD S.UOODMAN JAMES M.CHRISTENSON ROBERT A.LEVY PATRICK J.MCLAUGHLIN HOWARD S.MYERS.El LLOYD O.KEPPLE ROGER A.ZAHN LAVERN A.PRITCHARD City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55343 Attn: City Clerk Re: Proposed Improvement No. 51-359 Dear Madam or Sir: • This office represents Kensington Investment Company, the • owner of the property identified in your preliminary assessment ( role for the above improvement as properties No. 12-116-22-14-0010 a 12-116-22-14-0011. It appears from you Notice of Hearing on the proposed improvements in the above matter, and the feasibility report submitted therewith, that you intend to assess Kensington Investment Co. , and other properties in Norseman Industrial Park, Second Addition and Norseman Industrial Park, for an extension of drainage improvements over the property to the west of Norseman Industrial Park and Norseman Industrial Park, Second Addition. On behalf of Kensington Investment Company, we object to the proposed assessment, because the improvement described will not benefit the property owned by Kensington Investment Company. The existing drainage and sewer system for the property owned by Kensington Investment Company is adequate to meet all foresee- able needs of the property, and any assessment against the Kensington Investment Company property for the proposed drainage improvement is, therefore, inappropriate. THOMPSON, NIELSEN, KLAVERKAMP & J MES,I .A. ' .. I By �� 4A John Parsinen JP:meb r n J. • • • MEMO • TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl 3u11ie, City Engineer • DATE: March 24, 1980 • SUBJECT: Hearing for Vacating Excess Right-of-Way on W. 78th St. - Rosemount Co. i On March 4, 1980, the City Council received a petition from the Rosemount Co. requesting that the City vacate certain excess right-of-way along the • south side of W. 78th St., abutting their property as shown on the attached • drawing. This right-of-way was acquired by the State Highway Dept. back in • the 1930's for slope purposes and has subsequently been turned back to the City. We have reviewed this request and conclude that this right-of-way is excessive and can be vacated. There are no'utilities within these areas • ( and the remaining right-of-way for W. 78th St. will be 150 feet minimim, which is more than sufficient to accomodate any anticipated future widen- .. ing. CJJ:kh Attachment • • i I ergo April 1, I980 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. R80-70 RESOLUTION VACATING EXCESS R/W ALONG W. 78th ST. - ROSEMOUNT CO. WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has excess R/W along the south i side of W. 78th St. described as follows: • That part of Old State Hwy. No. 5 now known as W. 78th St. lying south of a line drawn parallel to and 75 feet south of the centerline of said W. 78th St., and east of the west line of property I.D. 14-116-22 22 0002 and west of the east line of Property I.C. 14-116-22 21 0003, WHEREAS, all property owners whose property is liable to be assessed for the making of this improvement were given ten days published notice of the Council hearing through two weekly publications of the re- quired notice and the hearing was held and property owners heard on the 1st day of April, 1980. ( NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such improvement as above indicated is hereby ordered. 2. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for this project and is hereby directed to prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement, with the assistance of Rieke Carroll Muller Assoc., Consulting Engi- eers. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Irene, Clerk . .V JiiIIIIX:j •-oi I i //1,/ • \ . . oi/1/ e •• .._, ... 4- - .r - N . , ....../ • P -1 :t 111 1 , • • .7 I C • I • • I . . . i . i-75:-- . • . . • .N• (f) .i.,. .. : 1 . . I . • . _ .. • Z •i 1 .•..; i,,-‘ (-)0 . i • Pt Iv gh N. t i C4 \, : ::: Q. `1, •: I 91 o to •.-1-:, fil . . • :. to N-... CA 4, -.1 •rq'N, . .1, (\,1) It., CO . t,. I ( :". 7,10. ...../• - ! • N I •it/ C'4.4'641. .1 Oa • , I . '491 •Cs. . ,•••'t ---Wt • • • r\S\4414a* N...-..... ; • —.- 1.1 .....1 I N3 I 0. • .. i • . t cst . , P Iti : . • • . : 'Li . ,....•4' f g kt‘ri, •1) .7... N. . , I m r- 23 • ••r,4. ill!' • • u 5 f -...t... C.\ . 1 r' .1 . ;..:.,,, \ .... ,........, it .i.,.;: i i• •1 id/ i• • .1, . „ 4 fic. • . \ I-0 lk • ;1..- -I : • > i s• s lit • ' * ,1 .1 . 0 ( 4 C, ,...;,.. • 1 . , -1 (311 . Ic 0 ..0.1."-- • _ • • -,...________,_____ ---J , .• .1 .. .1 • MEMO TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City'Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: March 27, 1980 SUBJECT: Hearing for Vacating Drainage and Utility Easements Lot Lines in Garrison Forest Second Addition, Lots 2 and 3 and Outlot I On March 4, 1980, the City Council received a petition from the Preserve requesting that the City vacate the drainanp and utility aacPmantc a1nnn the common lot lines of the above referenced parcels as shown on the attached drawing. This vacation request stems from a request to move the lot lines westerly a few feet inoorder to accomodate a house proposed to be moved onto Lot 2. This lot line adjustment is covered in the prelimi- nary plat request for Garrison Forest Fourth Addition, which is also • scheduled to be considered at the April 1st meeting. Vacation of these easements would be contingent upon approval of said preliminary plat. New easements to replace the vacated easements would be dedicated on the ' new final plat. Recommend that the Council consider approval of this variance request, subject to the preliminary plat approval.for Garrison Forest Fourth Addi- tion. . CJJ:kh Attachment • • 1't9 • April 1, 1980 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE (.. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. R80-71 RESOLUTION VACATING LOT LINE EASEMENTS IN GARRISON FOREST SECOND ADDITION • WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has drainage and utility easements described as follows: • The easterly 5' of L2, 83, the westerly 5' of L3, 83, the easterly 5' of L3. 83, the westerly 5' of Outlot I, all in Garrison Forest Second Addition WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on April 1, 1980, as required by law, and WHEREAS, it has been determined that good area planning requires that this easement be vacated and that it would be in the public interest to do so, • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ( EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Hereby vacates said drainage and utility easements. 2. A certified copy of this resolution shall be prepared by the City Clerk and shall be a notice of completion of the pro- ceedings and shall be recorded in accordance with the provisions of M.S.A. 117.19. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • • John D. Frane, Clerk q'O . Garrison Forest S.,',.,z,...cr"%oi-lci raz=- - _ _ .> ,-cam- ,- � . (� ' L. r65c 'J L7 Ban Con,Inc. so �7p 0 0 1.T!°4 PtSt4 PTO / ------ —1 L — I�i ,� arkWaY ;t;;,N ,,,, Amsden Ro .�.� Ande(�-n,.,� °,•'.o- J`.' •' d • c suu- •..--'iii:i�rr . °° LOT LINes To 1 I. t ', ' fr• ' u..'•1•"u *,N• • CO I '^»m F'. .,y.�' ^2'. .e%.moo; 3 y,•�� £ y t. •v •�u,•, yam`,M.• 4,:;• l206 paP �`� W eUTL Or C•--•• „-ll.:..- `• •^ $ • A.'6;!!,., J O TIC T O I • 4'-"`fro =O ,_uy:'i� Qae V I • • N p••_,uN .....,j!!I 1 0,1•H.• i 1. r;•1-ii. I M.lt.o.e Yy �t lN'�JNI•'•NN-:': N1.0........ I ' = ,•"sf-M ,r I... , 2ii a • : :::••••-::;'‘`1 , ..,.� 0 I I ��°" %:' Clark Circle �: •.. '; OUTLOT•-= 1 /•.,,•.n a.,,fv.r, .h Y!!'?`•, L s4 . . AIL. t` , b ",. , 2,/.V:).,,'1:, nr.l..'. .- .Jil•+, ,l,.l .. 1 ,I n E. Nero e I , I I ( 1 4 3 10 I 1� I 11 'T'h1.c Pies2r ve Res/Sales Office 941-4862 (24 hr) mil AIu1••eIon Lake:,nlaWay Sales Representatives: C,Icn h.aulc.ALimr!.c•Ia S5344 (Y ��� Arnie &Dorothy Weigel i. . 11aa1 aa1•NMI • , • April 1, 1980 ( (ATE OF MINNESOTA • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The following accounts were audited and allowed as follows: 7683 VOID OUT CHECK (200.00: 1001 GERTRUDE L. DAHLBERG Service-Liquor store 10.00 ., 1002 MUNICI-PALS Dues 5.00i 1003 SHEI RICHARDSON Service-Liquor store 23.63 1004 TWIN CITY WINE CO. Wine 800.23 1D05 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE Wine 1,596.16 ! 1006 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. Wine 1,627.88 1007 OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. Wine 1,409.92 1008 BUTCH'S BAR SUPPLY Supplies-Liquor store 111.80 1009 MINNESOTA DISTILLERS, INC. Liquor 1,496.54! 1010 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. Liquor 1,277.54i 1011 MIDWEST WINE CO Wine 1,184.30i 1012 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO. Liquor 975.791 1013 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Payroll 3/18/80 11,133.42 1014 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING Dues 198.00 1015 VOID OUT CHECK ( 116 PERA Payroll 3/14/80 8,490.51 1017 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN Insurance 6,156.92 1018 GROUP HEALTH PLAN Insurance 1,023.72 1019 HMO SERVICES Insurance 122.30 1020 NORTH CENTRAL SECTION AWWA Conference-Water dept 160.00 1021 STATE TREASURER, STATE OF MINNESOTA Fee . 15.00 1022 HMO SERVICE Insurance 1,222.00 1023 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE CO. Insurance 316.91 1024 MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN POLICE Seminar-Police dept 80.00 1025 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK-MUNICI PALS Municipals dinner 148.50 1026 PETTY CASH Expenses 10.47 1027 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Register a vehicle 3.25 1028 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE Sales tax 1,8130.38 1029 NORTH CENTRAL SECTION AWWA Conference-Water dept 135.00 1030 STATE TREASURER, STATE OF MINNESOTA Fee 30.00 1031 BLUE CROSS INSURANCE Insurance 439.60! 1032 INTERCONTINENTAL PACKAGING CO. Wine 224.09! 1033 GRIGGS, COOPER & CO., INC. Liquor 799.36: 1034 STEVE CALHOON . Expenses 11.47 1035 TWIN CITY WINE CO. Wine 269.82'. 1036 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO. • Liquor 834.36 1037 MIDWEST WINE CO. Wine 297.40. 1038 OLD PEORIA COMPANY, INC. Liquor 1,037.49' 1039 JOHNSON WINE CO. Wine 946.73' '040 VOID OUT CHECK .041 AETNA LIEF INSURANCE Payroll 3/14/80 180.00l 1042 ASSOCIATED OIL BURNER SERVICE Service 30.00 1043 ASSOCIATED WELL DRILLERS, INC. Pump repair & parts 121.25 1044 AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO. Repair garage door-Fire dept . 31.25 1045 AWARDS, INC. Thophies-Rec dept 115.90 • Page two ( ril 1, 19B0 • 1046 B J SEWER SERVICES Service-Sewer dept 60.00 1047 BATHER, RINGROSE, WOLSFELD Service-Ringroute 7Bth Street-Hwy 169, 3,044.23 TH 169 & Leona Road Signals, Lotus View Drive, TH #5 & West 7Bth Street & Mitchell Road, Temp Signal on TH 169 1048 BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC & MANUFACTURING Drive belt-Water dept 38.90 1049 RALPH & ELLA BRIGHT Duplicate payment-Garbage license 30.00 1050 BRUNSON INSTRUMENT COMPANY Equipment repair-Engineering dept 750.00 1051 SHARON BUNTIN Chaperone-Rec dept 8.00 1052 CARGILL SALT OIVISION Salt 680.69 1053 CHANHASSEN ELECTRIC INC Service pump motor-Park dept 28.00 1054 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS Helmet, files-Park dept 76.33 1055 CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION Parts-Street dept 31.71 1056 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. Electric eraser, xerox copies-Comm service 723.70 File-Engineering dept 1057 DASCO Cleaning supplies-Water dept 121.00i 1058 DASCO INC. Batteries-Police dept 49.92 1059 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO. Water meters 141.18' 1060 DECATUR ELECTRONICS INC. Repair radar-Police dept 62.621 1061 LOUAWA DICKEY Chaperone-Rec dept 8.00 '. 1062 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY Wall shelf-Water dept 47.96 1063 DORHOLT PRINTING & STATIONERY INC. Office supplies 395.89 1064 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT February fuel 4,275.2BI l 165 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY, INC. Face shiled, gloves-Water dept 68.63' )066 FARMERS STEEL CO. Bridge material-Senior Center 156.06 1067 FEDERAL DYNAMICS, INC. Degreaser-Water dept 238.82 1068 SHARON GAGNON Chaperone-Rec dept 30.00 1069 GENERAL BINDING CORP Plastic Bindings-Community services 43.00 1070 GRACO INC Hose-Street dept . 97.71I 1071 GUNNAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC. Repairs-City Hall 66.24! 1072 DIANNE HANSON Chaperone-Rec dept 15.001 1073 HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION Board of Prisoners 291.00 1074 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC. OF ASSESSING Dues-Assessing dept 45.00 1075 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC. OF CHIEFS Dues-Police dept 8, 350l 1076 ITEN CHEVROLET CO. New squad car 166.00 1077 ELIZABETH G. JOHNSON Service 33..0751 1078 JEAN JOHNSON Expenses 13.82 1079 KLEVE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING Equipment repair-Park dept 43.50, 1080 KOKESH ATHLETIC & GOLF SUPPLY Scorebooks-Rec dept 5.50' 1081 PAM LESTER Instructor-Rec dept 57.00 1082 M M INDUSTRIES, INC. Powdgr car wash-Fire dept & Public works 264.20'. 1083 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC Street sweeper, Brooms-Street dept 48,931.00 1034 MARSIIALL & SWIFT PUBLICATION CO. Printed forms-Assessing dept 65.00, 1085 ROBERT N. MARTZ Expenses 106.00; 1086 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIPMENT CO Oxygen 70.53 1037 METRO MACHINE & ENGINEERING CORP Valve-Water dept 76.00, 1088 METRO PRINTING INC. Book-Park dept 34.00; '089 METROPOLITAN PARK FOUNDATION Service-Park dept 200.O1: 1090 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION February SAC charges 44,178.7` 1091 MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY Service 2,943.3- 1D92 MINNESOTA TRACTOR COMPANY Equipment rental-Water dept 2,340.0f, 1093 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP Service 21.7. 1094 MINNESOTA VALLEY GAS COMPANY Service-Senior Citizens 310.0D; 1 ( e three - April 1, 1980 1095 MINNETONKA COMMUNITY SERVICES Bus service-Rec dept 22.00 1096 MODERN TIRE COMPANY Equipment repairs & parts-Street dept 469.77 1097 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO Service 7.93 1098 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. Service 5,723.42 1099 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO. Service 509.10 1100 PENNY'S SUPERMARKET Coffee-City Hall 80.28 1101 PITNEY BOWES Mailing tape pads 11.88 1102 PLANT EQUIPMENT, INC. Drain valve-Water dept 28.00 1103 POWER BRAKE EQUIPMENT CO Flashers-Police dept 81.60 • 1104 PRENTICE-HALL INC. Bood-Water dept 32.79 1105 PRINTERS SERVICE, INC. Knives-Park dept 21.16 1106 REED'S SALES & SERVICE Weed eaters-Park dept 258.00 1107 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOCIATES Service-Eden Prairie Lake Trails Estates, 51,469.18 Round Lake Utilities Phase II, High Trails Swr & Wtr, Round Lake Site Grading, Pedestrian Bridges, Valley View Rd, Homeward Hills Park Storm Sewer Develop, Norseman Ind. Park 2nd addition, Eden Prairie Super Valu Swr service, City garage survey, Ind. Road Utilities, Cardinal Creek Estates, Edenvale Blvd Cross Sections ( 08 ROBERTS DRUG Bandages-Rec dept 7.43 1109 SHADYWOOD TREE EXPERTS, INC. Tree removal 811.00 1110 W. GORDON SMITH CO Fuel 335.99 1111 VOID OUT CHECK 1112 DAVID RAQUET Flare set-Street dept 21.20 1113 DONNA STANLEY Minutes 100.00 1114 SULLIVANS SERVICES, INC. Pump tank-Park dept 50.00 1115 TELEDYNE POST Supplies-Engineering•dept 104.60 1116 CARRIE TIETZ Minutes-Park & Recreation 50.00 1117 TWIN CITY TESTING Tests-Water dept 55.00 1118 THE TYPE HOUSE Paper-Engineering dept 15.40 1119 ROGER ULSTAD Expenses 100.00t 1120 VESSCO Dry chemical feeder-Water dept 1,932.00 1121 WARNING LITES, INC. Warning lights-HWY 169-Vo Tech 40.60 1122 WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY Hydrant repair parts-Water dept 469.84: 1123 WEBER & TROSETH INC Nozzles-Fire dept 664•851 1124 ZECO COMPANY Hose, Couplings, Clamps-Street dept 67.341 1125 ZIEGLER INC Snow Plow-Street dept 2,650.00t 1126 POSTMASTER PostSge-Happenings Newsletter 477.8D 1127 GLENROSE FLORAL Flowers 23.8c 1128 ROOT-O-MATIC SEWER SERVICE Service 62.0d 1129 VOID OUT CHECK 1 1130 BLACK & VEATCH Service-Water treatment plant addition 1,501.54 1131 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION Service 176.W 1132 FORD TANK & PAINTING Service 1,250.0t 1133 HENNEPIN COUNTY CENTRAL SERVICES Supplies-Engineering dept 60.5( 1134 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS Book-Rec dept 8.1: 1135 SHARON PATRICK Refund-Rec dept 3.Os 1136 SANDRA WERTS Expenses 84.0 1137 SHARON WESTMAN Cleaning of Historical Cultural Center 567.4' 9aq Ie. efour • April 1, 1980 1138 GUNNAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC. Wiring-Senior Citizens Center 749.03 1139 LANG, PAULY & GREGERSON, LTD Service 7,061.17 TOTAL $244,519.64 • • • • • • • ,J 1 MEMO TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council • THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: March 27, 1980 SUBJECT: Hennepin County Request for Supporting FAU Funding Application for 62nd St. Crosstown • Project, Shady Oak Road to Baker Rd., I.C. 51-378 The Hennepin County Department of Transportation proposes to apply • for Federal Aid Urban (FAU) funding for the above referenced Crosstown Highway project. Prior to proceeding with the FAU application, the County is request- ing that the City adopt a resolution supporting this application. The County staff is requesting that they receive this resolution by April 11, 1980. Recommend adoption of Resolution No. R80-75. CJJ:kh Attachment • • • • Tgi • • April 1, 1980 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESDTA •� RESOLUTION NO. R80-75 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING APPROVAL OF F.A.U. PROJECT SUBMITTALS FOR 1981 THRDUGH 1983 County Project 6839; CSAH 62 (Crosstown Highway) from CSAH 60 (Baker Road) to CSAH 51 (Shady Dak Rd.) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie is the official governing body of the City of Eden Prairie; and WHEREAS, the City Council encourages and participates with improvements to obtain adequate transportation facilities in the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Department of Transportation submittals for F.A.U. projects during the time period from 1981 to 1983 include project(s) within the City of Eden Prairie; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie concurs with the subject F.A.0 project submittals by Hennepin County within the City of Eden • Prairie's boundaries; and • WHEREAS. the City Council has determined those projects as being warranted and desirable for improvement through the Federal Aid Urban Program ✓ within the time period of 1981 through 1983. NOW, THEREFDRE, BE IT RESDLVEO•BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, in regular meeting assembled, that the Transportation Advisory Board, the Metropolitan Council, and other boards and commissions associated therewith are hereby advised that the City of Eden Prairie supports approval of the Hennepin County F.A.U. project submittals for projects within the City. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on • Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: , SEAL John D. rrane, Clerk • i ( the MOW March 3, 1980 Eden Prairie City Council Eden Prairie Planning Commission Ladies and Gentlemen: The Preserve has been approached by two owners of pre-built Vo-Tech homes who desire to place them on Lot 2, Block 3, and Catlot I of the current Garrison Forest Second Addition. These houses equal or exceed the size and quality of the existing houses in the subdivision. They also will be occupied by the petitioners and are not speculative. The lots in Garrison Forest Second Addition are basically 70' to 77' wide with areas that range from 8400 sq. ft. to 24, 258 sq. ft. The proposed houses are 72' wide and therefore will not fit on Lot 2, Block 3. After careful study and a number of meetings with the City staff it was decided that the best solution would be to move the lot lines between Lots 2 and 3, and between Lots 3 and Outlot I easterly enough to accommodate the house. Outlot I is sufficiently wide enough to absorb these changes. The frontages on Garrison Way after the shift exceed those in the rest of the subdivision and the area of the new middle lot,at 8,654 sq. ft, still falls ( within the range of the subdivision. Since this is only a shift in lot lines,there is no change in the number of dwelling units. Also since the lots are already platted and no land is being added or deleted from the overall plat we are submitting this as a replat of the affected portion of Garrison Forest Second Addition into Garrison Forest Fourth Addition. For your information we have concomitantly made the following requests: 1 - Petitioned the Board of Appeals and Adjustment for moving permits for these two houses according to Ordinance 79-34. The public hearing is scheduled for April 17, 1980. 2 - Petitioned the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for approval of variance from the 50' rear yard setback requirement from Anderson Lakes Parkway for Lots 2 and 3 of the replotted Garrison Forest Fourth Addition. This hearing is also scheduled for April 17, 1980. 3 - Petitioned the City Council for vacation of the drainage and utility ease- ments along the lot lines being shifted. Easements on an existing plat cannot be just shifted. They must be formally vacated and then reestab- lished on the replat. The hearing has been requested for April 1, 1980. 4 - Requested action by the City Council on April 1 or April 15, 1980 on the Garrison Fourth Addition Final Plat. This would be subject to preliminary plat approval by the Planning Commission. 'It t • • Page 2 • . ( Eden Prairie City Council , Eden Prairie Planning Commission We urge your prompt consideration of this because the owners of the houses are under restrictive time constraints to remove the houses from the Vo-Tech property. • We urge your favorable consideration because this would determine the actual use of these three lots. There is uncertainty and apprehension in the neighborhood regarding these lots. This action would finalize the use and would give a sodded, landscaped, residential entrance to the subdivision. Respectfully submitted, HE PRESERVE . .6e' f(i �'_, Lee W. John on Vice President - Engineering LWJ/3i Enclosures: 1 - Location map 2 - Garrison Forest Second Addition Plat . 3 - Garrison Forest Fourth Addition replat ( 4 - Lot surveys of the houses on the Fourth Addition • • 4 . . ... ... . ............. .. . ... . .,... _ ,... . . . ' .. •• . • -..'..., , • .. . . . ... • , go 1 ima - to ( t • 1 g r---A !I 4.-- 1(1, ag o 0 . i • 16. . t.:Itl! ,,,x 1,, 1,.)•k 0 j A .p. a 1.4 --I /, r t . o i . . ri c aL *4 ...,, . ..„ . Oi g • , 8 ra la, 1!/ .--A.1 s ill x- __-_,...,_ .i . _ Z. 0 ---; -Ac) I sir, 1=14 /./•-• ;.--:-11:11.''....,-;?:-/c.:-,.•-...,-,...t,,,--.-_„)(,--(.). 1.,, -r-\,,-'._;1,, _,. ..,_. . . ,_0 ,,./ co) > .. . 7--- - ,Df a- ,- ,-.4-,:,..-.., .s, ,if 'NI\ \\ h, ,: AY X (9 49 114 a • •_a-\•'•.\• ,fr- '-).\-•.„, i,), •• ', e -.-f I/ ,. --,„, • ,_,, p ti.K, '-'4,$'\ k(rN :I), ,-,, . ,.• 1 ;tit ,../../ ,:,--::,,-.:,-.-:,,,, ,/ , ., c.... --„,...,.. /.. . Hu . ../. 14.! ...1 I Iiii Nt • • • 11 r---1--, i . .'\, 3 i i ,• i I/. ,...,.. ( _-7-.. -• \•:: ' el.I P# •\ l',2 WI V \\ - • • -\1 // 0 <44:1 ' )1 11 ); II jr . . . , • (1 • .,_. , . • 0 . , 1 . , e 1 ll'illIll -- •a or) ti • ./,• i 1 -.1:1.111 lo . -- - . a P -I- . . . 1 i . 1 : til , ta.. .!! i/ iii,..,, N [.._____. . .,- . TuEssni tit ... ... •1 j , . . ; ; * I ! 0 01 • EiN4 gi i .., ., . I . .. .' . . • •.... 0 i 990 r ..... . .... .. . ..... .,.._-..-._.. ..,. i . ,........•:••.•;, • ' • -•••• ... . .. ._!..:...:...:':.:';', • .....•..•...:•77.. 7.4;•... 1 • .. { { 1 L^ P rk" el. „� Amsden Road �' Lake$ a 1 1"y}4or i .•.w.., r } �= n 41.1 '7.,. 3 r nderap ,li e./lwe.. 1 iirIN A viifigit �pf,w !•N•1J, Nr1r goilifillii;e.g.:1 s, , �p au7LOr l'. r,, 1 .1� iifp �� t�A�r f.N-..-- .2 :.+ rr. , w . If oUPI TLOT t li „., !iry "1 .p at -,.r.s.MHYr Xi �6~ `i N o • 9. ." Ot/TL OT aff` t =t ura a r�rl'' M;'lar v 1 I N% ;fJ of ', "I'..". $ .,,,,,,a p O o ( —,--.1,do t K �e et 3 1, V' 2 • • ti%t` i ,a<' C3 /40 cu 1 , _ 11�!!! 1wLll17P JIM NI(x tlt • )1N INtI�•.:...rN.eO•.......,.� p tl,4 1 M N0 T. plf �3'71a__ /p w '$ �.taN EMI _qUTLOT Bf�ol 9Dr lv_Mi,• ♦9 Y1/r f•p*}i .a" t d. 1. a,eniwL 1 vs� .1xb�p $ ; ▪di l,a M),fi;illi-. �'M.O,..'•is\\�EZ•-`'4 i },'•fr I .1 If 1,� 1 rr .i', ,..i//aio/7 L a. ` 1,,f ,, Y1f 1,fo td t,,C 2lk. 2'@ if; ,_•Yl'8roj- ' I • ,,0J f t I, lo'N a;t %„C./a°,°;r' Clark Circle '`�•7 $'t ,z t9�..y e q x w r �Jidtz d :�> ak >R s oureor.. /,wel ' 2,i.,Bil l `J b i•'+ S`'a'C E, t O .1' / ; / '• 'If ., ',Jaw V . mroo • i f3 N!1'IJ•fl'E 4I ,g•' 1 1 4 1 : I I s 1 c.r 1 0. f V� 1 i�� 1 11111 Anderson Lakes Parkway //�� h Eden Pr:arw.klpv+esota 55344 7 I 1612)941-2001 egltIMIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIPII 1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR THE PRESERVE Lor I/ 8100t I &RRRISO/U FOK..=ST FOURTH A.PIr/oN HEAINEP/AJ GO. M/A1sJ. r•` ` gASEMo ,yy"— _ ,\ pRAIWAGE Ecr. ' �jtILITY 5-2 3,y8 ' '7 ..- ... 1/�' r— t • • A, 1 I -t ` �o 1 \\ ,A1• 6. • 1 \ 1. ! \ '4.0'i B9G/5 FOR.t3EA2/A)GS IS ASSUMED \ \\ tir X •0 DEtlOTES IROIJ MoutlMFut4 �? \ 41 ; I AS aE6CRr8b0 (iitow ;' S�o°5i ; ' q' • • NOTE . ,i). F \ �� \ A 0..4' l. R.L;S. ,,. \ .Z•io '+' Togs r4 ,......„. • ` •'' D .,a"1 T: 15 fir;. I $. 1 41'LONG IRON MONUMENT AND �cp. IDENTIFICATION DISC(ACTUAL SIZE) �1C1 • • SET AT ALL POINTS INDICATED. `^� /� MINK.REG.LAND SURVEYOR•7093 / J 6 L /k,,, 'eerN/r Me I is s�►rry we propane' Iy mo, under my /srpirr/sioa,and ' Q���, a Awl foot I an o rkly Regis/rod LOW Snroyw Z_L_ 30 0 30 under Me rows o/IA*Slow of//innoso/o. SCALE FEET ''"t.6�I,GL.,o-sys�-� qi^ Dot./? fe6 Rog No./za.. z JOB NO, 6-goo 9' [FIELD BOOK PAGE, 'DRAWN BY / I I CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR THE PRESERVE LOT 2, BLOCk/, GARR/50/0 PORE5T R,u127N 4Oo/r/OA) NEAWEP/u CO MAJ. \ f \ C4017;., 5,j12•,� 57 g0O 2.09- % — , 1,-- 1 — ' ,', ��_i % 1 D o '1�D•OD , NOvsC 1 ut Q. - pito-. ,;• -t fle�t` 0 , c `la's TAN GA k9.ij� • G. '7% ,` elf t i`' 8.9/ 1 , ) 0 DEttJOTES IROL) IflOAlUMWTS \` AS DESCQ/6E0 BELOW \ ��-r� NOTE : %� \• y u9R°SS t3 � 0. R S / pst2 15. 7 , 5 . ; 1 R .$ 7095 a .„4�5K;:r-. tbttI i 24•LONG MON MONUMENT AND IOENTFICATiON DISC(ACTUAL SIZE) • �/ SET AT ALL POINTS MOICATED. Mk REG.LAND SURVEYOR♦709S / L3A515 FOR DEAEIAJG$ IS ASS'MS / J ( L I tam*crag Me/M/t new wet away/ ed—ey er a e,a allow me direct t+oark/tn,on/ /[tl® , /A.1/awse4/jAiptltredLat/Slvrela 30 0 30 andr Me Iola at tat SW*at Abo.eA te. ONENNIMmos- --/f4..4, . 4€3,4-........,--.47T- i ^�°� ;w •K SCALE IN FEET �... .,., q14 Dale ZZfi6late,. Ab.i.ZGBz JOB NO, 6-0009 'FIELD BOOK: PAGE, 'DRAWN BY:(441. • CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY ' • FOR ME PRESERVE' . LOT 3! L3LOGk/J GARR/SOLI FOREST FOURTH ,ADO/T/OAJ HEJJAJEP/N CO. MU. I -1rb- T 55. ER%E..-t— 1 68£i,�/ , c Sfip=plr, .e \,- lb a • I ' E 1 ' , ` . q / 1 :" f `‘\ ©s87°55'W aety . 1 \ R=J0.00 le /5.35• •'., ..Ikl'Sg'e % 4 \ N 5313E 0 DE A3TES IRO()iWJ WJMEAJr % , AS oISC'leCO 6 LOW •I .`{ ',•`_ ,w' ,stir NOTE : • C+orLL.oy& BR515 FOA BeARIAJ6S /S ASSUMED._- -' + 24 LONG IRON MONUMENT AND / DENTIACATION DISC!ACTUAL SIZES • / SET AT ALL POINTS INDICATED. N REG.LAND SURVEYOR•T09S J I L NW.I Mai crNfy Mat this sirs/nos a 3:ER, Ay its,,r.a9.r�atria LaI,d s s.,aaI "" 1M!!Ns s duly RspsfanA Low/3Lrrga► 7_.'_1 30 0 30 a/1dM IA*lows a✓fAs Sim W Mrnn.Utrla. .qt.0..,, SCAtE =-j' s- �i^�w►► !J JOB NO: 6-9009 ,FIELD 800la PAGE: I DRAWN BY b4 vt,✓, GARRISON FORE FOURTH ADDITION 3-3-80 _— aY i ��- w I _ w &'Fh ns1M 5_ '°,mat °C; " ""-1 4.z i r.). \a k 4 ,' _'"�" - A'8?5 4( t h• R '•''`` $ L. 3 , t_ N+KROO % 1 FJREc , ".-r tyt4 s® \' •=, ECJyiy 1 i 11 VI Md i • O NTU I5014 MOMRA6RT 40[3COROD 06LON vi OEI NOR: DRAINAGE&UTILITY EASEMENTS taDas Q 3004 SCALE FEET fins114.440 MO YYWN we ewwuu.ac 1U1lea WV VMS FOR Kf3M43 N RUM= Mt IT al MOS44.caata WOO sOOFE[T 0OAitM IOU OO LIM WY{Nb"On AOJONING SC(AND REAR 4.011041,mo NO0 FEET IN MOM AOJOWNO sheet LNE3,UNLESs 01R[RIMe ANDYA7E0.A3 300IN00R ' OK PLAT. l J J MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, March ijl, 1980 Unapproved 7:30 PM City Hall COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman William Bearman, George Bentley, Matthew Levitt, Virginia Gartner, Grant Sutliff and Liz Retterath COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: NONE . . COMMISSION MEMBERS ON LEAVE OF ABSENCE: Hakon Torjessen STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Chris Enger, Director of Planning Jeanie Ohnsorg, Planning Secretary VI. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS B. GARRISON FOREST FOURTH ADDITION, by The Preserve. Request to replat lots 2 8 3, Block 3, and Outlots F, G, H, & I, Garrison Forest 2nd Addition for the purpose of moving onto 2 lots 2 nre- built Vo-Tech homes; and vacation of drainage and utility ease- ments for lots 2 & 3 & O.L. 1, Garrison Forest Second Addition. A public hearing. MOTION: Gartner moved, Retterath seconded to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6 - 0. MOTION: Gartner moved, Retterath seconded to recommend to the City Council approval of the Garrison replat of Lots 2, 3, and Outlot I, Block 3, Garrison Forest 2nd Addition and Outlots F, G, and H according to the plat dated 3-3-80, per the staff report dated 3-20-80. Motion carried 6 - 0. MOTION: Gartner moved, Retterath seconded to recommend to the City Council approval of the vacation of easement along lot lines of Lots 2, 3 and Outlot I, Garrision Forest 2nd addition according to the plat dated 3-3-80, and per the staff report dated 3-20-80. Motion carried 6 - 0. 994' STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission ( FROM: Jean Johnson, Assistant Planner THROUGH: Chris Egger, Planning Director • DATE: March 20, 1980 PROJECT: GARRISON FOREST 4TH ADDITION APPLICANT: The Preserve LOCATION: South of Anderson Lakes Parkway and North of Garrison Way REQUEST: Replat of Lots 2,3,and Outlot I, Block3, Garrison Forest 2nd Addition(a1l zoned R1-13.5) , and Outlots F,G, and H, (roadway). BACKGROUND Garrison Forest 2nd Addition was rezoned from Rural to R1-13.5 with lot size and setback (5, 10, 15 foot)variances in 1978. Todate approximately 25 of 35 hones have been constructed. See Figure 1. REQUEST The Preserve is requesting relocation'of the common side lot line between • lots 2 & 3, block 3; and lot 3 and outlot I, block 3 of Garrison Forest ( 2nd Addition to facilitate the placement of 2 Vo-tec pre-built homes upon lots 2 and outlot I. The request to move the 2 homes onto the lots will be considered at a public hearing before the Board of Appeals on April 17, as per Ordinance 79-34. The new plat created will be called Garrison Forest 4th Addition. The lot line changes also affects outlots F,G,and H to the north which were created in the Garrison Forest 2nd Addition plat to accommodate a realignment of Anderson Lakes Parkway. SITE PLAN The proposed plat increases the frontage of lot 2, Block 3, Garrison Forest 2nd by 5 feet (from 55 feet to 60 feet) and slightly decreases the frontage of lots 3, and outlot I. See Figure 2. The lots created are similar in width and size of other lots in Garrison • Forest 2nd. J The northeast corner of lot 1, block 1,.4th addition is in close proximity to a sedimentation pond and due to the slope of the lot down to the pond, the staff would suggest the corner be stacked with snow fence and hay bales to prevent sediment from site grading from polluting the pond. (refer to figure 2). CASH PARK FEE These lots are part of The Preserve PUD 70-04 and therefore arc exempt from cash park fee payment. • uarrison Forest 4th -2- March 20, 1980 RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the Garrison Forest 4th Addi- tion based upon the following: 1. The lot widths and sizes are consistent with the neighbor- hood. 2. The realignment of the side lot lines will create lots which can accommodate larger house styles. 3. The northeast corner of lot 1 should be staked with snow fencing and hay bales prior to site grading. • JJ:jo • • 99'g 1 . , 1 - • i ( G4RR/SOA' r-oR1:-sr SECOND AOD/I—/O/V EXHIBIT B -> 1 17.7-, W.f. r.. .... ^-" ol• ---.... ,... . 'III"•..4• ....."..'-'--- .....- -..'- 1.0.. . .—L .., :.k . (LOTS BEING CHANGED '" -- . ..-.0.:•,,..., ----„.••. • it _- -----7—— -- VA....A:AA:A --....--- .. •- '''''' ••i.y.•....-- —• -r-- .....-- $!•• • -It,. ‘t J....," ...V..' t-J4J, JI*.:leirt. -•- •• 1- 1,'7. •tl : ., •‘,,e, t• ' 1. '"-----1-r---....."-- ":;,4t. I '''.,o.., , ''. r.:0,...,. s,..:0 ,,. ,4\ •••:..i. ,.L.f.:,.....2_,J___....------: ... ,...,...• ,.., ? . .: t. .,•••.,. .•-.-. ..it• r. ., ••;.,:•.«. " , - •-0' t. •:- •`..; -. ' ,. ;11;32 . 1 .1:,. L. k i . • •••_, • • '•••...;•••• • . • .,•• ..;et k k I , '' ''' .. •*1 4..."'.'••t' , ..' 4' t,'... , ; ' ,. A.;....''': `, ...$: s'.,.' t• .::..r;f: les.'Z ...t.:.:•.:::''..t.•?t`‘••..''''. t•"-:''-''i j ' . e ;.r. ..,i ••...?,_...... ... '.. ' '......•••A.A..4- ,::•••• . i :•• sq. • Z. ( f . :.•'•i::.:::.,tz.'...-577i..04:7.C , :.. .7 .:.f.. ' • ,,,,,,,,•t , ..:.° t ..., I ''' • ,,.• .. 1• ; .:',. 1.:. .---, T:... .. ,t :ts ...: .....-.-77. . .7 ..-,t, -... 1- . -.:',.:0''.>: .. 5.... • t . . s . .s' ,_ ••••••11— ...,..• :••l."./.' . , 717:14-....,\-• ••'' el -.• I, • .''•'' ‘‘• ''' / ." • ....t;...1./ ^---62 •fi' . '1 4'.:',.."••-.4:"•\ '...44.: ,',:•-"..-•.....007'.:07'8.'te• .,P, tll• •'". , •.e..,,I..!... . . .,.. ..n.k..\f'..'' • , ;•' •".-:.!,,f''......" :,,,M.';• ! . . ?• , . ,fr -,-, ..,,,,, e 1., f. , -,,. ,'...p.s,7.7.. .1::,. _6 :.• ...,,,,,„...,:›o• fr."..\_ ... ,,7. «ii% P.' '.., ...........v:-.:•4 ., ,....-,-,,,, A ,.. ••,,!:.•,,.'1'._ -• /.." ' '17::i.7".^..rr'. kS, - "Lt.''• .....);.;'''' ••••-"rS\%-- -1.— - . ;;,''.:::::.1). 'gr.'''. : ••• *'..S. * i , 't-V,.- „.:,1...-. ,-,•,. • .1.,- -...- ,.,.•A.--, •" t ,-.-4 A A•••••• Jr;,•;^.:,.., .,....:;.!..„.••••••;;,....,., t. t •• .-,'"oe- .,'e-,t'sl. .•,. , - •• , ., . 4.......,.. •••1 ,. .... . • . ' •'A.:-..: , • ... • .t' ..t --r:\ 6 : .... • V:j ., /. r j•....,\ I el/7Z OT As- • •,.... ...-,LA:AA:.., ..:.",..„; I.:: .... . 1, \ •:: kt. ..: • :-:-?•. - -•`1 •. 4:- •., • ‘ . • .0 • .,‘,.t , : •,„ ' .,,, ri . . ......,- z, • • ;..• • .•,•. • ---1.:.,, ,Al,.,JAY .. ..•N" Jee-;,,ry • • r'I ' C , t:::-.:•v :.;-,.:.:,:o:':t,t `:`,.:"...•:`..:"t ; :,, 4 ;: ! ..... . .. . - ; c. ... , •, ,_ z•;'.. .,, .. ;4., e,,,•or ..1.... 4I:I1.,It I• J I. ,..,r,4 1 .1.) ...., . :.,▪ •11.,V .•.1 t 4 JI4 If. :0 "S:.;.4 if•I,•N Jtr 4 4,- .- -- —-1,-,;..,::— -- . 9q9 • • rinitur 1 . t 1 Lots built upon • : • . . ., ,.. .. .... ✓f - • —/ •0 1 / 5 q2 W J N Tr \ SPp �1\ r'' tif `�O.' 1 iL '2 DO \ \ ,\ C C,jTy -----��'� l ri y `5, g ram) area �•'._.. :=✓y—� requbalesCl. s , 1',:-t �\rt-F' ..s ��� ' nd snow f ..• u v �� fencing w, i • / J; ..3 lit • (•i I o a.mts+w\\�++1K'' m MU"IC WWI FIGURE 2 1000 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO.80-67 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GARRISON FOREST FOURTH AODITION BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows; That the preliminary plat of Garrison Forest Fourth Addition dated March 3. 1980 , a copy of which is attached hereto and amended as follows: is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances and amendments thereto and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the day of 19 Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor John D. Frane, City Clerk I SEAL • . vol MEMO ( TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Carl Jullie, City Engineer DATE: February 28, 1980 SUBJECT: Vacating Easements - Garrison Forest 2nd Addition The attached petition has been received from the Preserve to vacate certain drainage and utility easements along common lot lines of' Lots 2, 3 and Outlot I, Garrison Forest 2nd Addition. The reason for the vacation request, as ex- plained in Mr. Johnson's letter, stems from an additional request to move the existing lot lines in order to accomodate a Vo-Tech pre-built house on Lot 3. The Preserve has applied to the Board of Appeals for the required housemoving permit and also for rear yard setback variances for Lot 3 and Outlot I. The procedure required to accomplish the Preserve's request is as follows: 1. City Council approval of the easement vacation (April 1, 1980.) 2. Board of Appeals approval of housemoving permit and setback variances (April 17, 1980.) 3. Planning Commission recommendation on replat of Garrison Forest 2nd • March 24, 1980.) 4. City Council approval of replat (April 1, 1980.) Recommend approval of Resolution NO. R80-51, setting a'hearing date of April 1, 1980, for vacating drainage and utility easements in Garrison Forest 2nd Addition. CJJ:kh Attachment 1002 • MEMO TO: Mayor Penzel and Members of the City Council THROUGH: Roger Ulstad, City Manager FROM: • Carl Jullie, City Engineer • DATE: March 28, 1980 • SUBJECT: Traffic Signal and Road Improvements Co. Rd. 18 and Anderson Lakes Parkway I.C. 51-388 Hennepin County Dept. of Transportation has requested a resolution from the City giving approval to the construction plan for the above referenced improve- ments. The County now estimates that the City's share of the project costs will be $178,231 per the attached letter of March 24, 1980. The County's previous estimate for this project was $86,700. Increased cost is due in part to a change in the design for the Anderson Lakes Parkway section to provide for a center median. This change was necessary in order to satisfy Blooming- ton's concerns over turning movements at the intersection. The representative from the County will be present to answer any questions in this regard. As the Council may recall, Ryan Construction Co. and The Preserve have agreed to pay $100,000 of the project cost. The balance of $78,000 is available and can be taken from the City's MSA Construction Fund balance. Recommend approval of Resolution No. R80-73. Within the next few weeks the County will prepare a formal cooperative agreement for this project which will be submitted to both Eden Prairie and Bloomington for approval. Resolution No. R80- 73 will allow the County to submit the plans for State Aid approval and thus . not delay this much needed project. CJJ:kh Attachment • 1 • APRIL 1, 1980 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. R80-73 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND IMPROVEMENTS AT CO. RD. 18/ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY (I.C. 51-338) • WHEREAS, plans for Hennepin County Project No. 7841 & S.A.P No. 181-107-01 showing proposed alignment, profiles, grades, and cross sec- tions for the reconstruction of County State Aid Highway No. 18 and Anderson Lakes Parkway within the limits of the City as a County project and a State Aid project have been prepared and presented to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said plans be in all things approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on Wolfgang H. Penzel, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, Clerk f IVOt s • (. ITDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av, South 4:� Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 't*Ls HENNEPIN _IL 935-3381 March 24, 1980 Mr. Carl Jullie Director of Public Works City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 CSAN 18 AT ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY COUNTY PROJECT 7841 S.A.P. 181-107-01 Dear Mr. Jullie: Submitted herewith is one print copy of the plans, a sample copy of the resolution approving the plans, and a copy of the engineer's cost estimate for the above referenced project. ( A construction cooperative agreement is being prepared and will be submitted for execution by your Council within the next few weeks. The City's estimated ' cost share of the project is $178,231.20. This share is the estimated cost to the City for the contract work, plus signal cost, plus the County's engi- neering cost in the design of S.A.P. 181-107-01. We are requesting approval of the plans by Council resolution at this time so the project can be processed without delay and construction can begin in the Sumner of 1980. It is anticipated that construction will be completed in the Fall of 1980. We will appreciate your cooperation in approving this project and will assist you in any way we can. • If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, • _, . / - t .-- , G; �L,/;\ Vern Genzlinyer, P.E'' Chief, Design Division VG/GAR:Iar Enclosure HENNEPIN COUNTY 1005 on equol opportunity employer • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council • THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager 1' FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services —g -- DATE: March 27, 1980 • SUBJECT: Creekwood Park At the March 18, 1980 meeting staff requested the City Council continue the Creekwood Park appraisal to the April 1 meeting, so that the Planning and Engineering staff's could review and agree upon a proposed alignment for the extension of Homeward Hills Road north of County Road 1. Staff members agree that the alignment shown on the attached draining would be the most feasible alignment and creek crossing. This alignment divides both of the proposed park parcels for this area; therefore, City staff recommends that the Council consider purchasing the western portions of both of these sites to incorporate them into a single park site. This site would include approximately 15.7 acres. The appraised vaule is $49,750. This purchase would include 1,800 lineal feet of the future Homeward Bills Road at a width of 80 feet. If the City Council does determine to purchase these parcels, it should be noted that the road right-of-way should be excluded from the park property from the onset to eliminate any future problems that are caused by developing roadways on park property. • Staff requests authorization to negotiate one year options on each of these parcels. BL:md • • IW6 • • • ( \ . ..., • , p I 4 , j - PARKING O __._— OTLOT ;,,,,, r Ji,1 Tr:,.. •f•:::+10 CANS ji CAI ____ w `�,a F p I. . \ \ f Q • •arcs./ A" \ . ;�1------------1'i --SOFTBALL ss♦� ` '•� i —_..frarrfr�arsfn' FOOTBALL —.— `�_ v % 'FREE �,' -. / i ` — • ` . I SKATING./Q 10,7 /°`• /JJJ111��� m I yfi \� • . !' ,S •ROPOSED LOCATION OF so,Y IR HOMEWARD HILLS ROAD . \ . (7; . '\`9Ps- I�)/J .' MEADOW -- ,� ♦�, _ \-\ j ' ' ' • \ '.:-—12,`- ',..-s.''''''.-- .1,‘..„__________„_.,:_/ • ' \ j . Epp c. �� MARSH ` i I i �•♦,♦�1 1 rri • / i.,\ •-•CREE K__ WOOD_ 15.7ac. �_.__.. \\ ' I�.i I i SCALE'1.100 \\ P MEPIORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council • • THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: March 27, 1980 SUBJECT: Community Center Site On March 20, 1980, the City Council met in a special meeting with the • School Board to discuss where the Community Center should be located • on the Round Lake School/Park site. After some discussion "option C", as presented by the school's architect, Ray Keller, was chosen as the preferred site. Option C showed the Community Center located at the northwest corner of the City park property approximately 600 feet east of the high school. This option would require the City relocating the proposed baseball diamond slightly to the north and east and would eliminate one of the softball fields north of Valley View Road. This would also require expanding the proposed parking lot in that area. • Pedestrian access from the school would be either by a direct pathway from the east side of the high school to the rear of the facility or by the proposed pathways along Valley View Road. The greatest concern over this proposal was whether the federal officials would allow this facility to be constructed on LAWCON property, and if the 1977 LAWCON development grant could be altered as proposed. On March 24, 1980, Mr. Jeff Hanson, Grants Administrator for State Planning Agency, indicated by telephone that he had contacted the regional level of the Department of Interior to ask if this would be allowed. He was informed that the site of the recreational facility is an allowable use on LAWCON property and requested that the City submit a sketch plan showing the proposed location and describing its use and the need. On March 26, staff submitted two copies of a sketch plan showing this location with the letter providing the requested information. • Staff would recommend proceeding with the planning of the facility at this location. BL:md • 137 • \ \ \ i / \ • ,•,......, .A1404.7443 \ \ . / ;,tz:';)4.....akt ,4I ) \ L \ \ N \\/// ICI % �'.'� �� ii ' ,II 3GayiG� A.1 /44 5XFANS/ON g \ 1 \A . ice Azst�A 4 \ J,e,-4,1:1-zr4Ainvo, \, \, . poio,.. • . . G G C-1�Ptkv�v.,)5' . • ! D!_%C.4 \\ \-......- .,\ • \ ,,' I ` ' I ( ' = 1: .- 1 >U0 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services- A► DATE: March 2 8, 1980 SUBJECT: Homeward Hills Park Grading/Ownership/Bids During the previous two weeks, City staff have had discussions with representative of Hustad Development Corporation regarding Bluffs West 3rd Addition. Staff was concerned that if Bluffs West 3rd was not to • be final platted in the near future, the City would have to cancel plans for development of that park during the spring of 1980. The southern portion of the park was dedicated upon final plat of Bluffs West 2nd. However, the northern half of the park will not be dedicated until final plat approval of Bluffs West 3rd. The low elevation of the land in the proposed park site requires development of the entire park site to be tied into a series of storm water holding ponds that will serve Bluffs West 2nd and 3rd, and must be graded simultaneously. Due to the nature of the economy in 1980, the single family housing market has dropped off. Development of this area will not occur as rapidly as was predicted in 1979. Therefore, the need for this park will also not be as critical as predicted in 1979. • The staff has always felt that it was important to have this park, and series of storm water ponds, completed along with the grading of the adjacent development and prior to storm water being dumped into the site. The site will be very difficult to grade as it is now due to its low, wet nature. As soon as storm water from Bluffs West 2nd is added to the existing runoff problems of grading this site will be increased. Therefore, the Community Services staff would recommend withholding building permits to Bluffs West 2nd until the park grading is completed or requiring the storm sewer to be • piped across the park to the existing low area adjacent to the outlet that runs under Homeward Hills Road. Without this provision there is a possibility the City would not be able to develop the park as proposed. The City received 17 bids for grading of-Homeward Hills Park on March 28, 1980. Because of the proposed change in the status of Bluffs West 3rd; staff does not anticipate that the City will own the northern 16 acres of the park within 30 days, therefore staff has not opened the bids. Staff informed the bidders that we would hold the bids until the April 1st Council meeting at which time the Council could direct staff to open the bids or reject all bids unopened. Staff felt that if the Council decided to reject the bids, it would be most fair to all bidders not to open the bids. BL:md 010 • • • • • MEMORANDUM ( TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services FROM: Stephen Calhoon, Park Planner DATE: March 24, 1980 SUBJECT: Bid Summary and Analysis of Rented Construction Equipment The following is a comparison chart of heavy equipment companies who bid on construction equipment for lease this year. The equipment would be • operated by our crews this year for grading of County Road 1 and 4 Bikeway/ Hikeway, Topview Park, Edenvale Park Playground and Valley View Road Hikeway/Bikeway. We plan to use one medium dozer and one bobcat for approximately 3 months, beginning May 1, 1980. Staff recommends taking a 3 month lease rate for purposes of awarding the bid to the lowest qualified bidder. Low bid would be: Medium Dozer Valley Equipment $8,775/3months Bobcat Case 3 240/3 months total 3 month lease $1 All leases can be extended as needed. Bid Summary: 3 month lease rate Valley Equipment Case Ziegler Medium Dozer $8,775 $12,450 $10,950 • Bobcat no bid $1,080 no bid • • • 10 n MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manger FROM: Bob lambert, Director of Community Services— DATE: March 27, 1980 SUBJECT: Metropolitan Airports Commission Lease for Flying Cloud Bailfield Expansion At the January 2, 1980 meeting, the City Council reviewed a proposed lease agreement with the Metropolitan Airports Commission for expansion of the existing ballfields at Flying Cloud Field. It was noted by staff that this improvement was approved in the park bond referendum, and staff recommended development of these fields as early as possible in 1980 to insure use by the Athleticlai Associationfl i in land 7 81. junioe r sizeon will footballnclude fieldsl plus parking baseball field, 2 regulation football fields facilities for the entire 30 acre facility. This major expansion would cost approximately $50,000 including grading, seeding, installation of backstops, goals, roadway, parking lots, barriers around parking lots and the fence around the entire area. The City Council referred this item to staff and the City Attorney for review and recommendation to be considered at the Feb. S, 1980 Council meeting. At the Feb. 5 meeting, the City Attorney had still not resolved several issues with the attorney's representing MAC. At the March 18 meeting, the City Council requested that staff review other lease . agreements MAC may have with cities that are using airport property for recreational purposes. The City Council suggested that the City of Eden Prairie should have similar lease agreements; however, the termination notice must be at least one year. The attached chart indicates those lease agreements the Metropolitan Airports Commission has with other public agencies for public use of airport property. With the exception of the Richfield Golf Course lease, all of the lease agreements are for athletic facilities such as ballfields and have the following similarities: 1. Rent is free with the exception of the proposed Eden Prairie lease. 2. All these agreements require the indemnification costs. 3. All lease agreements may be terminated upon written notice or a 30 day notice with the exception of the proposed Eden Prairie lease which is a 90 day notice. 4. The majority of the terms of the lease agreements are indefinite with the exception of the Richfield Golf Course, Blaine athletic fields and the proposed Eden Prairie lease. 1012. • • • _2_ The Flying Cloud.Field Master Plan shows no planned development in the area of the ballfield expansion. The Metropolitan Airports Commission staff would not recommend approval of any typo of lease if they anticipated any airport need of this property within the forseeable future. The Community Service staff would not have recommended the City Council enter into this lease agreement if there seemed the remotest possibility of any development occurring in this area in the next five years. If the City Council wishes to request a minimum of a one year termination notice, City staff will forward that request to the Metropolitan Airports Commission, which will next meet on April 21, 1980. The City will be receiving bids for grading of this expansion on April 4, 1930. Staff would not recommend awarding bids until the City has entered into a lease agreement. Therefore, if the City Council requests staff to attempt to negotiate a 1 year termination clause in the lease, staff will have to request all bidders to approve holding bids until May 6, 1980. BL:md • • • 10)3 . � § ` a ! % ®2 k i a !°gSk0 k I /» . _ =or or2| 2 ( ( !ti 2 ! ! ` ` f /o \: g� )o . )o 4 § . #. #4 . i. i. a § ' a § «k §� _ !\ ! / \ \ �g ' \ k� k2 k _ \. a= __ E • • ; ! R 3 P. P. ; P. P. . ! §; |!5%. - ]- ]) ®o4.! g; t 0 } {\ • k \U. \ !( § I I } 00 U V .I. . ; o § 4 2) ) AV 21 0. 41 t. k 5 41 2 u a- I- >.! !; k! , ! 8 §\/ § S . ! . - S� \ $ $ $ $ & ! ! ! 1 U. U. o . )! . m . • k \ /k }\a ) j 74 ! /. 2 { ! ( ' / . . ,§ . } j . - \ k |g • \ • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager 1 0 FROM: Sandy Werts, Recreation Super DATE: March 26, 1980 SUBJECT: Historic Preservation Feasibility Study of the Cummins-Grill House At the November 20, 1980 meeting the City Council approved the hiring of Miller-Dunwiddie-Architects, Inc. to prepare a feasibility study for the historic preservation of the Cummins-Grill house located at 13000 Pioneer Trail. The purpose of the study was to investigate the structural soundness of the house, to prepare a list of major improvements that would be required for the restoration of the house and the cost estimates for these improvements and procedures for nomination of the house to the National Register of Historic Places in Washington, D.C. The report was completed in December and a presentation was made to the Historical/ Cultural Commission by F. Dunwiddie on Feb. 7, 1980. At that time, he told the Commission that the house is of historic value to Eden Prairie, that it is structually sound, but that some structural repairs must be made. Before restoration work is started, the hiring of an architect to prepare complete restoration drawings and to oversee the actual work is recommended. • Also, application should be made to place the house on the National Register of Historic Places. The registration would make the site eligible for matching grants from the Federal Government for Restoration. The Historical/Cultural Commission at their March 6, 1980 meeting made the following motion: • MOTION: To recommend to the City Council that the consulting architect be retained and to employ his recommendation in the restoration of the Cummins-Grill house. This motion was made by Albert Picha and seconded by Allene Hookom and passed unanimously by the Historical/Cultural Commission. If it is the Council's decision to implement the study, the City should file for National Register Status for the Cummins-Grill house. An architect should then be retained to complete the study and drawings of the house. Upon completion of these two steps, tho City can apply for funding to begin restoration. SW:md • 106 • • HISTORIC PRESERVATION FEASIBILITY STUDY OF THE CUMMINS-GRILL HOUSE 13600 PIONEER TRAIL EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE J 8950 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD \, EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 MILLER-DUNWIDDIE-ARCHITECTS, INC. 7913 SOUTHTOWN CENTER NINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55431 DECEMBER 20, 1979 ioi‘' TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF TFUE BUILDING 2 A. DESCRIPTION 2 B. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 3 III. RESTORATION PROGRAM 6 A. RECOMMENDED RESTORATION DATE 6 B. WORK PROGRAM 6 C. COST OF RESTORATION 10 D. RECOMMENDED PRIORITIES _ 11 E. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION PROGRAM 12 IV, CONCLUSION 15 i iol7 1. INTRODUCTION The Cummins-Grill House has long been recognized for its historic significance. Built in 1879 by John R. Cummins, it is one of the older houses in the City of Eden Prairie. In 1975 the Cummins-Grill House was purchased by the City of Eden Prairie as part of Staring Lake Park. At that time, the City gave life estate privileges to Mrs. Martin Grill, the previous owner of the house. This summer Mrs. Grill decided to move to a nursing home and the City took possession of the house. The purpose of this study commissioned by the City of Eden Prairie is to investigate the structural soundness of the house, prepare a list of major improvements that would be required for restoration of the house, prepare a cost estimate for these improvements, and outline the procedures for nomination of the house to the National Register of Historic Places in Washington, D.C. • The study has included a detailed examination of the house to determine . what was the original construction, the extent of subsequent modifications, and the order of their occurrence. In addition the existing house was analyzed for its structural stability, a work program was prepared for the restoration of the building, cost estimates were prepared for the restoration work and priorities recommended for the restoration of the house. It should be noted that the informdtion developed in this study is based on a physical examination of the house, a structural analysis of the visible structure, and a brief review of readily available documentary materials. Subsurface examination was not conducted nor was in-depth historical research undertaken. • 1 IUS� II. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE BUILDING • A. Description The Cummins-Grill House is a two-story residence with a full basement under the original L-shaped house. The exterior walls are of buff brick, hauled to the site by wagon from the Chaska Brick Works. The foundation of the original house is of random ashlar granite. There is a two-story brick addition dating from about 1910 on the north side of the original structure. The addition replaced an earlier one-story wood frame kitchen wing. Both the earliest part of the house and the 1910 addition have a gable roof covered with sawn cedar shingles. There are return end gables on the original house characteristic of the Greek Revival style. The 1910 addition has a shed roof gable on the west side. Windows throughout the house are double hung wood sash. Narrow single light sash and 2 over 2 light sash were used in the original house while 3 over 1 sash were used in the 1910 addition. Two of the latter were also installed in the southwest corner of the original house and probably date from about 1910. The original house has two brick chimneys. One of these is located at the west end of the house...the other near the center of the north-south ridge. Both have been altered from their original appearance. There is an exposed brick chimney at the north end of the 1910 addition. This too appears to have been rebuilt. The original house has an L-shaped porch which appears to be original to the structure. It was at one time an open porch but has been enclosed in later years. A large enclosed porch at the east end of the original house is of a later period and probably replaced a smaller open porch. 2 ,p )ill f. • 3 The 1910 addition has two porches, one on the west side and the second on the north side of the house. Both were at one time open porches. The center portion of the west porch has been enclosed. The interior of the Cummins-Grill House is of wood frame construction and is plastered throughout. Interior woodwork in the original house is of butternut on the first floor and pine on the second floor. The 1910 addition has pine woodwork throughout. Floors in the original house and 1910 addition are of wide pine boards. These have been covered with narrow strip maple flooring in the Parlor and Bedroom on the first floor of the original house. Floors on the second floor have been painted. Plaster wall surfaces in the original house have been wall papered throughout. Ceilings have been painted on the first floor and papered on the second floor. Both walls and ceilings have been painted throughout the 1910 addition. • B. Structural Analysis 1. Foundation Walls. The foundation walls of the original house are approximately 14" thick and are of random ashlar granite. The bottom three feet of the foundation wall is 18" thick. There is an 8" brick cross wall adjacent to the stair to ' the basement. A 4" brick facing has been installed on the inside face of the west one-half of the basement. The foundation walls of the 1910 addition are of field stone. Generally the foundation walls of the original house are in good condition with no evidence of lateral displacement or settlement. Similarly 1UXC1 4 • the foundation walls of the 1910 addition appear to be in good condition. However, some minor settlement appears to have taken place at one point along the east wall of the addition. • It is recommended that the foundation walls be repointed as required inside and out. The localized area of settlement along the east wall of the 1910 addition should be excavated and stabilized. Care should be taken in the excavation to recover and record any artifacts encountered as well as evidence of the earlier Kitchen dependency. A qualified archaeologist should supervise the excavation. 2. Exterior Walls The exterior walls of both the original house and the 1910 addition are of a buff Chaska brick. The brickwork on the original house is in excellent condition. Some repointing will be required. The brickwork on the 1910 addition is in good condition with the exception of a portion of the east wall. The mortar joints Adjacent to one of the Kitchen windows on the east wall have been seriously eroded. The exterior wythe of bricks is loose and needs to be relaid in this area. Care should be exercised in relaying the bricks to match the composition, texture, color and profile of the original mortar. Generally mortars used in buildings of this period were soft, had a low percentage of Portland Cement and were no harder than the brick used in the wall. 3. First Floor Framing System The first floor joists in the original house are 2" x 8" full dimension lumber at 16" o.c. Originally the joists had a span of 13 feet in the south 5 • ( wing and 16 feet in the east-west wing. However, a 6" diameter oak center support beam has been added in the south and west wings supported on 6" diameter oak posts. The beams appear to be in good condition. However, the support posts should be cut off above the floor and new concrete piers and footings installed. Ttro additional wood posts should be installed under the beam in the west wing to provide added support of the.beam. One post should be placed at the west end of the beam and the other midway between the existing post and the 8" brick wall. In the east half of the basement no center beam was installed. Rather the floor was reinforced in two places with 3" I-beams supported on 3" steel posts. It is recommended that a new wood center beam supported on wood posts with concrete piers and footings be installed in the east half of the basement (. replacing the present system of I-beams and steel posts. III. RESTORATION.PROGRAM Based upon the visual inspection conducted as a part of this study, it is apparent that much of the original fabric of the 1879 house remains intact. The 1910 addition to the house was built of similar materials and Ade. design. Those alterations that have beennto the structure do not preclude the possibility of restoration. A. Recommended Restoration Date Based upon preliminary research and visual inspection, it is recommended the Cummins-Grill House be restored to the period of its early occupancy by Mildred and Martin Grill (c. 1920). This is a tentative restoration date and subject to change after all research and investigation is completed. An earlier restoration date from the John R. Cummins period (pre- ' 1908) is not recommended since it would require the removal of the 1910 addition and reconstruction of a wood frame kitchen dependency about which little is known. Generally buildings should be recognized as products,of their own time. Alterations which have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance are discouraged. B. Work Program Before any restoration work on the Cummins-Grill House is commenced, it is recommended that a competent restoration architect be employed to conduct detailed historical and architectural research and prepare restoration drawings. He should also oversee the actual restoration work. The research conducted as a part of this study has been confined to readily available materials and superficial examination of the existing building. Further detailed research 6 ioz3 • • 7 • is indicated to confirm periods of occupancy, use patterns, paint colors of interior and exterior finishes, details of original porches, original wall paper patterns, etc. The Cummins- Grill House was well constructed and the basic structure appears to be sound. Work required for the restoration of the building includes the following: 1. Exterior a. Repoint exterior brick joints as required using mortar to match original. b. Replace the wood shingle roof. c. Reconstruct the brick chimneys to match their original appearance. - d. Replace all roof fleshings. e. Restore original porches. f. Repair existing windows and doors. g. Remove enclosed porch on east side of original house and reconstruct earlier porch. • h. Repaint exterior woodwork to match original colors. 2. Interior - First Floor a. Parlor i. Reconstruct original fireplace and hearth. ii. Remove maple flooring. iii. Restore original wallpaper on walls. iv. Replace tape balances on east and west windows. v. Replace porcelain knob on Bedroom door. vi. Restore original wall, floor and ceiling finishes. 'Ui • 8 b. Living Room i. Remove composition flooring. ii. Restore original wallpaper on walls. • iii. Install wood stove of appropriate period. • iv. Restore original wall, floor and ceiling finishes. c. Bedroom i. Remove maple flooring. • ii. Restore original wallpaper an walls. iii. Restore wall, floor and ceiling finishes. d. Kitchen (1910 addition) i. Remove composition'flooring. ii. Reinstall two sliding doors in archway opening. • iii. Restore original wall, floor and ceiling finishes. 3. Interior - Second Floor • a. Hallway i. Remove expansion tank on north wall. ii. Restore wallpaper on walls and ceiling. iii. Restore painted wood floor. iv. Remove door to bathroom. b. South Chamber i. Restore wall paper on walls and ceiling. ii. Restore painted floor. iii. Install wood stove of appropriate period. 1025 • c. East Chamber • i. Remove existing bathroom. ii. Restore wallpaper on walls and ceiling iii. Restore painted floor. iv. Repair damaged plaster from roof leak. d. North Chamber (1910 addition) i. Remove partition in center of room. Salvage doors for use in Kitchen. ii. Restore original wall, floor and ceiling finishes. iii. Install wood stove of appropriate period, iv. Restore painted wall. v. Restore painted floor. • e. Northwest Chamber 1. Restore wallpaper on walls and ceiling. ii. Restore original wall, floor and ceiling finishes. iii. Restore painted floors. f. Southwest Chamber i. Restore wallpaper on walls and ceiling. ii. Restore painted floors. iii. Restore original wall, floor and ceiling finishes. 4. Interior - Basement a. Remove existing concrete floor. Compact earth to provide stable surface. b. Reopen windows on east and west walls. Restore wood sash to match original. c. Install new wood beam and columns on concrete piers and footings in east half of basement. d. Install concrete piers and footings under wood columns in south and west wings. Add two columns in west wing. • e. Stabilize east wall of 1910 addition. 5. Mechanical a. Remove existing oil fired space heaters. b. Install new concealed warm air heating and ventilating system. c. Remove plumbing fixtures and piping associated with bathroom on second floor. 6. Electrical a. Remove and replace all electrical wiring in the house. b. Conceal all electrical outlets. c. Remove existing electrical ceiling fixtures. d. Install electrified kerosene lamps of appropriate design. e. Install smoke detection system with monitoring by local fire department dispatcher. f. Install security system with monitoring by local police dispatcher. C. Cost of Restoration • + Estimating the cost of restoration is at best a diffiAlt task. Even were complete plans and specifications available for the original structure, the number of unknown factors would still be quito extensive. Later unrecorded alterations, additions and improvements, together with buried details of 1021 11 construction, combine to make the determination of precise costs extremely difficult. For this reason, the cost estimates for restoration given in this report have been given within a range rather than as an exact amount. The costs given for restoration have been based upon unit costs from similar projects for the work outlined in the work program. These are building costs and do not include the cost of furnishings or consultant fees. It should be recognized that we are in a period of rising construction costs. Increases of 12 per cent or more per year may be anticipated. In order to maintain accuracy, restoration costs should be updated periodically as work progresses. The cost of restoration of the•exterior of the house would be between $53,900 and $59,300. Work required to st$ize the foundation and structural . systems would cost between $7,600 and $8,400. Restoration of the interiors would cost between $29,600 and $32,600. Rewiring and installation of underground .11,305 23,5°O electrical service would cost between $14,500 and $16,000. New heating and ventilating systems would cost between $437600 and $167000 to install. In addition, in order to comply with Federal guidelines for preservation of archaeological resources at historical sites, funds should be budgeted for excavation of a number of test pits by a qualified archaeologist in areas to be excavated. The cost for this work would be between $2,000 and $2,500. The total cost of restoration as outlined in the work program including the above would be between $128,000 and $141,300. D. Recommended Priorities Of highee priority is the installation of a new roof and stabilization of the exterior walls to pArent further moisture penetration of the building io2g 12 envelope. Of high priority would be structural stabilization of the first floor framing system and restoration of exterior windows and doors. Of lesser priority would be the restoration of the interiors and the installation of new mechanical'and electrical systems. E. National Register Nomination Program The National Register of Historic Places is the official list of the Nation's cultural resources worthy of preservation. Listing in the National Register makes property owners eligible to be considered for Federal grants- in-aid for historic preservation through State programs. Listing also provides protection through comment by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation on the effect of Federally financed undertakings on historic properties. Nominations to the National Register are made by the State Historic Preservation Officer in each State. The State Historic Preservation Officer in Minnesota is Russell W. Fridley, Director of the Minnesota Historical Society. Nomination to the National Register is a five step•process involving (1) preparation of a four page Nomination Form, (2) review and recommendation by the State Review Board for the National Register, (3) review and certification by the State Historic Preservation Officer, (4) review and acceptance by the National Park Service, and finally (5) listing in the National Register. Properties proposed for listing in•the National Register are evaluated on the basis of criteria established under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. These criteria provide for inclusion on the Register of significant "districts, sites, building, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association and: 1oz() • 13 1 . I • A. that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or B. that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or • C. that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or D. that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history." Ordinarily cemeteries, birthplaces, or graves of historical figures, properties owned by religious institutions or used for religious purposes, structures that have been moved from their original locations, reconstructed historic buildings, properties primarily commemorative in nature, and properties that have achieved significance within the past 50 years are not considered eligible for the National Register with some exceptions. The Cummins-Grill House would be considered eligible because of its significance in at least two areas Agriculture, and Exploration/Settlement. John R. Cummins was apparently a horticulturist of note in the area, experi- menting with apples and grapes in an attempt to find varieties that could with- stand the cold Minnesota winters. Mr. Cummins bought the land in 1856 and vas one of the pioneer settlers in Eden Prairie.. In addition the House might also be eligible because of its significance in the area of Architecture. The Cummins-Grill House is an example of the Greek Revival style of architecture executed in the local Chaska brick. io30 • • 14 • • Nominations to the National Register must include information on • name, location, classification, owner of property, location of legal description, representation in existing surveys, description, significance, major bibliographic references, and geographical data. Further historical research will be needed to prepare the documented statement of significance required in the National Register Nomination. A detailed description of the information required for National Register Nominations may be found in How To Complete National Register Forms published by the U. S. Department of the Interior. • • • 031 • IV. CONCLUSION The Cummins-Grill House was built in 1879 with a major addition about 1910. A careful analysis of tho house reveals a building that is basically sound with a wealth of historic fabric that will allow its restoration. The total cost of restoration would be between $128,000 and $141,300. These costs include restoration of the interior and exterior of the house, structural stabilization, and new heating, ventilating, electrical, fire • protection and security systems. It is anticipated this restoration work would take place over a number of years and would be arranged in stages. Of highest priority would be the installation of a new roof ($23,700 - $26,100) and stabilization of the exterior walls ($7,500 - $8,300) to prevent moisture penetration of the building envelope. Of high priority would be structural stabilization of the first floor framing system ($7,600 - $8,400) and restoration of exterior windows and doors ($10,700 - $11,800). It is our opinion that the Cummins-Grill House is eligible for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places based upon its local • significance in the areas of Agriculture and Exploration/Settlement. • • 15 • PORCH i ta Ol ' 0 i a c ..�-�- tclTc> N ,1 ° I t I rOpr f c r,. ,O u` t 1 INS 1 +LIVING i { BEDRooN, ROOM ivii c.i. , � tom. t' i Poara I1_-tkJ. Y moms PORG; n , 111 QAC,LOtt h 1., 4 y i F-IC-6T PI-001: PLAID It' I Na 4cA c aau.Ta ) CtUMMIN',-ERIL.. H706a 12120/7R 13600 Plo066g. TC'1NL EDEN f7RAIL'JC/MN. I MPIWI t . ON 2 I c4tAMeee o . i; o . r LOOM QM �• n,rinrwrrnw.rrtf�irvw.r�sin..+�.....:.. ,w.+►r ,� ••.•.. 'nflfl. -. ...� i J C4AMSG . . C#AMbEC }, 1O • C GL Fir : al.* G+AMg+GR 44 r �` rrrrs_ • SECOND F1-0012- PLAN No %Aix= lit' Noatw CUMMikS-641 L.L 140U40. iyf?,ahcj 13Goo plOOCCg ¶R4i4. EDEN PgAIQ.1E,MW ;039 mrri3q • F GRAw L. ° 7f'Ace • 2 0 T . - i , 1 - - -- f7 I ! c I. ice, o 1 �L. j UP - 9PACF- 1 Is r _ �raCA n t' 4 $,\14-M1;uT PL M) u00.14 LVMMItJS-GWI.L FfOt!`;2. 11120f7Q 13b00 PIOW[-C.42 TZAIL eDEN Pa'h eLei MN MPIASI 103S MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council TIIRU: Roger K. Ulstad, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community ServiceI -- DATE: March 28, 1980 SUBJECT: Hidden Ponds Park Negotiation At the March 18, 1980 meeting, the Council authorized staff to begin negutiations on options for Hidden Ponds and Red Rock Park sites. The history of the Hidden Ponds Park site dates back to the May 24, 1974 'rezoning agreement on Hidden Ponds. One of the conditions of the Developers Agreement was the following:"Lots 13 Ind 14 be platted as Outlots on the plat rather than into 25 lots as proposed, and the road which crosses the nature trailway to serve this area should be eliminated and cul-de-sac north of the trail. Blocks 13 and 14 would be retained as outlots for 3 years from the date of approval, and if the City or school district failed to acquire the property the preliminary plat would be effectuated." • "The City should proceed to acquire Blocks 13 and 14 with purchase price to be somewhere in the $100,000 range provided the developer meets the assumptions stated previously for paying all assessments and construction of all roads to the service area." Blocks 13 and 14 totalled approximately 12 acres. With the addition of Blocks 15 and 16, the acquisition acreage would total approximately 15 acres. The appraiser estimated the market value of this site at $7,500/acre, which would equal $112,500 for the 15 acre site. There is $8,803.12 in outstanding special assessments at this time. The total estimated market value is $121,303. On March 27, 1980, staff met with Mr. Dick Knutson, one of the present owners of the site (there are 10 partners that have some limited ownership of this site). Mr. Knutson showed several methods on how his firm had valued this site at between $243,000 and $215,190 selling the 31 unplatted lots to a developer. Mr. Knutson refers to the 31 lots that were approved in the preliminary plat in 1974 on this 15 acres. Mr. Knutson also suggests that if 12 acres were worth $112,500 in 1974, 15 acres must certainly be worth more than $120,000 six years later with inflation of land costs exceeding 10`; a year. Mr. Knutson grants that he is more inclined to give the City a better price this year than he was last year because of the housing market, and is willing to negotiate a reasonable purchase price. However, Mr. Knutson feels that that 15 acres is worth more in the neighbor- hood of S170,000. Staff requests authorization to negotiate an option somewhere between these two figures. BL:md • • ----, ,,,,e.:: ..._._) :;. •r, >,=-7,---,1. e; . ..--f ' ?': trs.!_..(v ..,•,,-..,,,,, ,..-----.--,-:, 1 ;--,•,,,,-:.::-..ci-'._r.-.. :-.e:.:.:-.;,,--..._...:-:--..:.—,.• • • • -.---........„_., •:.-. i.-...,. _.. - -; ;`, ?.! ;,„1..,\,a,s/ ,1 \.,. '/k A_,-I....1.4.,7,7z. ! 1. ...-i• . `...,- . .4 ... • '1..‘'11'; ‘':/%4 .i..\'.".•.\* 1,-,psi,'i\.:J..::;37(_4 ; -,..:;_,-. ____.—. . . ,,t-Q-.--!•\.,y- r. :,v.--;—_?i:7 11 -- • -,-2--iss7-11, i,. • k i _ 1, .‘ ••ki \. .. /.. :\.: ::,0 ----/':\v.-- t.,...•':_j r--,-d .).- ‘ ‘-'---O.-.-1--113-1, ', • -•,-, ---7,--,, \::.,, i :., 1 -,,., : r----x ....t ‘..- ,, •---. - •,- 1 . '.;••• •7'.___.7- 11-:•••,./...„\s',/:...„);•__' u__-1•••• • /.(-- 1 -----2,•••;:;\tit.Arzi-N„. ",,, i • ...... 1_,_: 1.__,...._\,•••.„\:".....-, -r.r--., _3„...-- , S;.,„„\.„.....-v--1:-..., ,.._\. ._. , % /._ • .....-\ ,.1 i --,...s. ,-.-1! .1----t'''\/A.\ JiLi •, 7--..-r -\;ILel.: ...f • . Tc---1---:'-./ -' .- `.`.N,./ •'-,• - /3--„--., 1, _,....L?)"-:-: ..'4,.."1.':_____'S.,,,, '.:1-1- ,7E1.12:!...4- -11-7.-1 „‘'', ,.:;;:!'--- I Iss ‘ \. 1 1 -1-7.--;* - I -2/17%..1 1.2:._4<""; 1\---1, ....„!;..-:;*A .,`...\-.4.-, •v\-_- \ -1--1 1-1 • k,,......f.,,,,i ,t.....•:..E. ....,"_Ny„,----7_;:„..4...• : • !I ,..„-..1,,, ---A . .12/A-F•ibi/\ •:,-->-•1? :.b.: .. -- 7 •1,f • )--1--. . .-.i. --, • i. . ,, .c.„_(,:4-. 1 .1.-;.•-\,.// . ,. ,.... _2:;,...3/ / • r. . -..j'" 7\''/, -, i' - .."-- \ ..• I* ' I i i t •s 1.'Ar.i?‘_,*4,.--I'cr?/f „ 1 .->:.z.i-'..----1 I-...4-.1 . ‘ /1 , i‘. / \ 1 7J1.; • , •iicki• ?•7-,s; •,.P -- ,___ i e. 1 ,. • • f • •\ •, / ! I•__-____I-7-1 . - \- N"? , ,---- 7- -:: I- L u.. ..1,.......,-;.,..-.- . ?.,.,: r___.1 .! , ;t../ . -:-- \ i---- : :, ---- ----/C-1-1- i G\ --i I . II i • '-./ ?,4 J. ..‘; f1 .''....i,-,-/- -1 ‘ .: '-'' 'l *---- ' ' --------) - t 1 < 1,.,e , , 9. Ail:,::..!=,----, '4 V • .. . i : • ---. r 1 .. ...t. • --- ,1, ri .':•_,:••••-,7,"...-..-5..x.'„,„c—: ''' --_"' :..17-,-1LL-----//1 --11k ,---& . • r •„z._,•:;1.n., •--• - ,,, „I '.1 _,,, ••._____ - ___ L_ --, - x„....,,,. • , _ ,z ,....„. • . / l!: - • I. . .......„ 4- \k v....-;.I!. -- 1,• • ---•:,:.:f••. ,;_...- ' '• ." 57. . 77 ,f.-----77z: i \--"I‘,..--..r.t , „.. , fi % . • ‘ • . .„1 , - I IC) ,r • ,..i.,i- .......,- ,. . • ..7 4. ssi% / .. / I .,...4.....„.,'L„. •,. _ ..c,111.t1-:.• '.. va %1 t -..„ rs,p ! , }-t._..1,„ .7: - •, ,\?k,% • • 11,-,- - I. : tr•-1-----4 i • y 'Ai s - L‘.,.A\ ,...\,.,,,, ..,) :•,.... ,‘,,s \ • - 1•,,, i : / \ .k. r--- i '----IN''', .... i 1 h ! ••,:•y414,1.•V-_-.. •,:. 7 ,,-- --\•\‘'.!-;1,--":41 : i I 1 i---11-•-•_: ‘u /i vi li _i__> — ( . .. • ,. .--7.1:-....:-. --__ -1---(-1 r 1 • •,., - )---_ •••••:..,. -*„.•1-7/_,/ li.• i _ i .i I i i :1--r. \ '\.,111 ••••„ ---1-" \-). k\ ‘. ... ?. --" . .--7,-- 1 .1; -A. ' • ''. • • . 1 ( ..„.....*\ . .".1 r.. ..../ .• ... .:',. •''' i - • i . ,e:,'L • 1 :..:::' ...... ...4 --i Abt .I.--,,A.. .. « LLZ-i .C. I I 7. '' 24w•i'i ....c.:: ' $ --- !--, ' ... :.....-:•-\• ------1,t- -•,‹ r.t,,! ..,,..: */ - :.1 . - I— -- •z,.<(-.."... - - i --- /, -,-- gr''.1 6;,.------..e.t. • ‘4 li••• .:r.- i % ',. ...,./ z, I 'I I 1.-r:1 \ ,-. .,:-.i , •.7......Li/.. Y.. \ \ . b ; • .1 . :I- _ _ .. ----- r-v• -----,,..4414,s z.. t-. ./.:k.. i f:3 \ ,, . i C•icr'.. ',.... . ,-..".fl . ..-L!i''' i. ' i-I''' ....lt 1-•-• .144''''..i. f•4 \ ",\- . k . ' .. .. ,. . [j .-••,„,,,,,- ,t..,;,, ..„ • Y • i ••-- . ...y. --c-,.-!••:t-t` •-•.-,r --,.... • , .; 0; ----• - ,.... .‘,..-,,p,---••:- i."-:•1„•.r--.):•-•-•1 (- ......„,..,..-..4 • .1.. ; — • ..- • 1.•%,•:11--.,:.,:•-_Ala4-1.- -A , i• it i 1 • ! k I ••• . •—••.,.... • __ I,. ,..,,:.„,,, .v...j_... ,,,..,. i.,. . 4. 'zi„......, ....: ....... ,f- ..".. •:•;:iL..,;T,.... .....1. ,,..-,. 2. t 11N; \!',.. ,1"....---,.:!-3. ••• -' *-• `.*---1;7.-• • . - : ty 1 et. - •-•-:- --- .-S -.--. "., -30.7'1 t•, .'i'"\e 3 T. • , . /11:!.... . ,.. -t•i,i, ' : Ty,...-Q—`- • .-.:iis'4'1,A-_•„?.k*.t:-kr,,,!,--el -. II' ., I r ..-) . 1Y--•<.,-It' . •-/V . - I e t i i i! e 1 .,t.''•,..;,..t.,te..,. . j,,* ...,:1-1;W;,.,..riV:•.4. f.....--1 t 1--- 1,.•••.•)---,•;,.,4-••••• i 1. '' ..„ ..-\. -r-: . „4,1,,,-;• ,,, ; : ---l''.-1-.. .-e .".' . N_ ** '• v • IN . . /.11.1.://fe) 1 .\ t • 's\ / 1 1 I . , - "F _________._ _.______ ___._____ I.... ..........__ ion • (61,. • ...... • '1 0.51.1 . . • 'I f•I .. - . . , .. . . . . • • • TO: Mayor & Council FROM: John Frane DATE: March 27, 1980 RE: MIDB'S Eden Hills Company • The attached letter requests a one month extension for the Eden Hills MIDB Project to the May 6, 1980 Council Meeting. The proponent indicates that the project will be 100% occupied. • • • 4 • • 144 • • • • ROSEWOOD CORPORATION ( March 25, 1980 • • Mr.John D.Frane Finance Director City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie,MN 55343 Dear John: I am writing on behalf of Rosewood Corporation requesting a postponement of my meeting with the City Council of Eden Prairie from April 1, 1980 to May 6,1980, There are several reasons why I am seeking this request. The first is that I antici- pate having a lease signed for the occupancy of the entire building by the end of April. The second reason is contingent on the first in that financing for an Industrial Revenue Bond is only available at the present time on buildings which are 100% occupied. Thus, the third reason being that there is no other financing available for construction at the present time other than Industrial Revenue Bonds. Fourthly, the current status of the Industrial Revenue Bond contract which we have • with the City of Eden Prairie is such that it would be very costly and time consuming, and profitable to no-one, to start from square one on the Industrial Revenue Bond procedural trail. • Thank you for your consideration in this, John,and I know that by granting to us this extension we will be able to provide to the City of Eden Prairie a project which will certainly be an asset. Should you have any questions,please call me. Cordially, 7e-?-1/a4r— Howard L.Rekstad Vice President HLR:sd cc: City Council Members Real Estate Development•Real Estate Investment Services Construction•Maintenance Services•Property Management Retail Operations•Warehousing Services 2432 Prior Avenue North.P.O.Box 8307.Roseville,MN 55113,Phone:(612)636-8050