HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 08/15/1989AGENDA
TUESDAY, AUGUST 15, 1989
COUNCILMEMBERS:
SPECIAL EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
6:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock and Douglas
Tenpas
City Manager Carl J. Jullie and Assistant
to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson
I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
II. INTERVIEW CANDIDATES TO FILL VACANCIES - 1 Vacancy on the Historical &
Cultural Commission ilia I-Vicancy on the Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission
III. ADJOURNMENT.
AGENDA
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 15, 1989 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock and Douglas
Tenpas
CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant
to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director
John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris
Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation &
Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director
of Public Works Gene Dietz, and Recording
Secretary Deb Edlund
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Resolution No. 89-175 Authorizing the Electronic
Funds
Page 1996
Transfer of City -Page 1997
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,August 15, 1989
C. Resolution No. 89-184 Certifying Final Proposed 1989
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
TiTrevy
D. Resolution No. 89-185 Supporting National Drug Polic
y
Page 1998
Page 1999
E. Amendment to the Cooperative Construction Agreement be
t
w
e
e
n
M
n
D
O
T
P
a
g
e
2
0
0
0
and Eden Prairie for TH 169 (Resolution No. 89-180)
F. Resolution Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Ordering
P
r
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
of Proposed 1989 SpecTii—Assessment Rolls and Setting Hearing
Dite (Resolution No. 89-181)
Page 2010
G. Approve Reconveyance of Outlot B Ridgewood West to C
e
n
t
e
x
H. Authorization to Execute Subrecipient Agreements for Y
e
a
r
X
V
CDBG -- Authorizing Mayor and City Clerk to Execute S
u
b
r
e
c
i
T
i
e
n
t
Agreements with Hennepin County for Year XV CDBG Proj
e
c
t
s
(Resolution No. 86-167)
I. Request by Dennis D. Gonyea for an 18-month Extension to the
Development Agreement for Dutra A Gonyea's 4th Addit
i
o
n
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CRESTWOOD '89 by Alex Dorenkemper. Request for
Z
o
n
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
Change from Rural to R1-22 on 0.84 acres with varianc
e
s
t
o
b
e
reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Preliminary Plat of
2
.
1
7
a
c
r
e
s
into 2 single family lots. Location: North of Dell D
r
i
v
e
.
(Ordinance No. 30-89 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 89-17
7
-
Preliminary Plat
Page 2013
Page 2015
Page 2017
Page 2019
Page 2022
Page 1918
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 28-89 re: Mayoral Ter
m
VII. PETITIONS REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request to Raise Normal Water Elevation of Mitchell
L
a
k
e
(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
P
a
g
e
2
0
3
1
from June 20, 1989)
B. Request for Funding from Southwest Corridor Transporta
t
i
o
n
CoalitioTTResolution No. 89-186) Continued from Au
g
u
s
t
1
,
1
9
8
9
C. STARRING HIGHLANDS by Cliff and Mary Anderson. Req
u
e
s
t
f
o
r
Preliminary Plat of 2.17 acres into 3 single family l
o
t
s
w
i
t
h
a
front yard setback variance to be reviewed by the Bo
a
r
d
o
f
Appeals. Location: Northwest corner of Ridge Road a
n
d
E
a
s
t
Staring Lane (Resolution No. 89-176 - Preliminary Pl
a
t
)
D. Appeal from Decision by Board of Appeals & Adjustments - Request of BradieTP. Kuyper to Set a Date for Appeal of Deci
s
i
o
n
o
f
Board of Appeals & Adjustments regarding setback to d
e
c
k
Location: 16534 South Manor Road.
Page 2041
Page 2032
Page 2035
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,August 15, 1989
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
A. Lawful Gambling Study Committee - Final Report
IX. APPOINTMENTS
A. Appointment of one representative to the Parks Recreation &
Natural Resources Commission to fiIi an unexpired term to 27
2
1
3
/
9
0
B. Appointment of one Representative to the Historical & Cultur
a
l
Commission to aff an unexpired term to 2/2819,
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
B. Report of City Manager
1: 1988"..City Audit Report
C. Report of City Attorney
D. Report of Director of Planning
E. Director of Parks Recreation & Natural Resources
F. Report of Director of Public Works
1. Receive Bids and Award Contract for Bluff Road Improvements,
I.C. 52-141- TsZlaThn No. 89-IU)
2. Receive Bids and Award. Contract for Country Glen:Street and
liTi975 Improvements, I.C. 52-17I —TReso1ution No. 89-183)
G. Report of Finance Director
XI. NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Page 2057
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
August 15, 1989
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY A COMM.)
Great River Construction, Inc.
Johnson Construction & Drywall
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY)
JMA Builders
Mr. Handyman
Signature Homes of Carmel,Inc.
PLUMBING
Galaxy Mechanical Contractors
Southwest Plumbing
Stant Plumbing & Heating
Thriftmaster Plumbing
SEPTIC SYSTEMS
J. P. Norex, Inc.
Duane Ritter Excavating
GAS FITTER
P & D Mechanical Contracting
Swanson & Schiager Plumbing
HEATING & VENTILATING
Realistic Heating & Cooling, Inc.
REFUSE HAULER
Randy's Sanitation, Inc.
PEDDLAR
Freeman Hayes (Firewood)
Chris Rush (Water Purifiers)
These licenses have been approved by the department he
a
d
s
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
f
o
r
the licensed acOvity.
Licensing
/9 06
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 89-175
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ELECTRONIC TRANSFER OF CITY
FUNDS.
IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE THAT THE CITY FINANCE DEPARTMENT IS AUTHORIZED
TO MAKE ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFERS TO ANY FINANCIAL INSTI-
TUTION FOR THE ACCOUNT OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN-
ESOTA.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THIS 15TH DAY OF AUGUST 1989.
GARY D. PETERSON, MAYOR
JOHN D. FRANE, CITY CLERK
NT)
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
City Manager Carl J. Jullie
(1)()
Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson
Final Proposed 1990 Property Tax levy
August 10, 1989
In keeping with the existing truth-in-taxation timelines, Resolution
No. 89-184 has been prepared for Council action by August 15. On
August 1, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-172 which set the
initial proposed 1990 property tax levy at $12,680,000, the maximum
amount available under the current levy limit statute. The final
proposed 1990 property tax levy would be the same as the initial
proposed levy.
By adopting this Resolution, the Council would establish the property
tax it could not exceed during the budget deliberations this fall. By
using the levy limit figure as the final proposed levy, the Council
would be certifying an amount it could not exceed in any case.
Recommend adoption of Resolution No. 89-184.
CWD:jdp
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 89-184
A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE FINAL PROPOSED 1990 PROPERTY TAX
LEVY BY THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
WHEREAS, the Minnnesota Legislature enacted a law in 1988 which
specified a "truth-in-taxation" process to be followed by cities for the
purpose of establishing property tax levies for the next fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the statute requires that the City Council certify a final
proposed property tax levy by August 15; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has undertaken preparation of its
1990 Budget and identified the need to levy property taxes; and
WHEREAS, statutory levy limits contain conditions and formulae to
determine the maximum amount of dollars which may be levied for property
tax collections,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie that it certify a final proposed 1990 property tax levy of
$12,680,000, an amount equal to the City's property tax levy limit,
AND FURTHER, that this figure be transmitted to the Hennepin County
Auditor.
ADOPTED by the City Council August 15, 1989.
Mayor Gary D. Peterson
ATTEST:
John D. Frane
City Clerk
/NM
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 89-185
WHEREAS, the sale and use of illegal drugs are facts of life throughout the
United States; and
WHEREAS, the scope of this serious social problem does not respect city or
state boundaries, but in fact transcends national borders; and
WHEREAS, local resources can attack the inroads drugs have made into
American society only in limited ways; and
WHEREAS, drug abuse is present among all segments of American society, but
insidiously affects young people who ignore evidence that casual use of drugs
often leads to addiction; and
WHEREAS, young people represent the greatest resource of the nation; and
WHEREAS, investments - costly though they may be - need to be made now to
prevent the well-documented costs to Americans in the future from insufficient
efforts to curtail chemical abuse among young people; and
WHEREAS, because these problems are omnipresent throughout the United
States and must be solved on a national level,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie, Minnesota, that the Council urges the Government of the United States
of America to articulate and enforce a strong national policy for the control of
illegal drugs.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council this 15th day of August, 1989.
Mayor Gary D. Peterson
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
nen
MARK KILROY Founownon
P.O. Box 777
Santa Fe, Texas 77517
409 -925 -7771
July 24. 1989
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members:
The tragic death of our son. Mark, and the deaths of fourteen other men w
h
o
w
e
r
e
f
o
u
n
d
buried in Matamoros. Mexico, has focused the attention of the entire wor
l
d
o
n
t
h
e
d
r
u
g
crisis that faces our nation. If we are to survive, we must aggressively att
a
c
k
t
h
e
e
n
e
m
y
that is destroying us from within.
On September 5, the new national drug policy will be announced. The dec
i
s
i
o
n
s
t
h
a
t
w
i
l
l
be made in formulating this new policy are the some of the most critical d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
s
e
v
e
r
t
o
be made in the history of our country. We believe that only through a unit
e
d
o
u
t
c
r
y
f
r
o
m
the people of this country will the message that "we have had enough" be
d
e
l
i
v
e
r
e
d
t
o
o
u
r
leaders.
We are asking that the Mayors and City Councils in each city and town in the U
n
i
t
e
d
S
t
a
t
e
s
adopt a resolution in support of a strong national drug policy. Send
t
h
e
r
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
immediately to: William J. Bennett, Director of National Drug Control Policy
Executive Office of the President
Washington. DC 20500
Illegal drugs are everywhere—big cities, small towns, the countryside. It is out of control.
As the leader of your city, please create a great awareness among your c
i
t
i
z
e
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
urgency and the need for their participation in a demand for a great chan
g
e
.
F
o
r
t
h
e
i
r
own safety and future, urge the people to also write letters of support to Mr.
B
e
n
n
e
t
t
.
Many of our young people use illegal drugs casually, thinking that they wil
l
n
o
t
b
e
c
o
m
e
addicted. Their attitude toward drugs is positive and the possibility of addicti
o
n
i
s
n
o
t
t
h
e
i
r
concern. We must get the "social users" to quit NOW before they become addicted. With
every addict, there are many innocent victims among the grieving families an
d
f
r
i
e
n
d
s
.
The prevailing attitude is that the present generation is lost and that educat
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
next
generation is the answer. Education will not work if we allow this casual attitude toward
drugs to continue. The kids will not believe us. The high school dropout r
a
t
e
i
n
T
e
x
a
s
i
s
35% and most dropouts are regular drug users. What is the dropout rate
i
n
y
o
u
r
s
t
a
t
e
?
Drug rehabilitation success is less than 20%. One generation of many drug a
d
d
i
c
t
s
a
s
s
u
r
e
s
the decline and fall of this nation.
The support of your City will have great impact. We plead with you to
h
e
l
p
u
n
i
t
e
t
h
e
people of your community and of our country. Only when the peop
l
e
o
f
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
collectively demand a change will a strong drug policy be announced. Un
i
t
e
d
w
e
w
i
l
l
b
e
able to start controlling the great drug evil and its countless tragedies.
Respectfully.
;/ 0104/ %Alia/0J
m and Helen Kilroy
lqqq4
M.A.R.I.
Mate A Respeatitle reausitarat
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 89-180
AMENDMENT TO THE COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
TRUNK HIGHWAY 169 BETWEEN PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE AND CSAH 1
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation has prepared final plans
and specifications for the construction of TH 169 between Prairie Center
Drive and CSAH 1;
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has approved said plans and specifications
for the improvement of TH 169;
WHEREAS, a Supplement No. 1 to Cooperative Construction Agreement No. 65705
has been prepared which identifies the revised cost participation and
contract unit prices for the construction of said improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that said
Supplement No. 1 to Cooperative Construction Agreement No. 65705 for S.P.
2744-43 (T.H. 169=5) is hereby approved subject to conveyance of right-of-way
for Aztec Drive, within 12 months after completion of the project;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized
to execute the agreement on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 15, 1989.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
OoO
-MEMORANDUM-
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
FROM: Rodney W. Rue, P.E.fl.t.;
Design Engineer
THROUGH: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
DATE: August 10, 1989
RE: Amendment to the Cooperative Construction Agreement for TH-169
On May 16, 1989, the Eden Prairie City Council approved the Coope
r
a
t
i
v
e
Construction Agreement No. 65705 for improvements to Trunk Highwa
y
1
6
9
between Prairie Center Drive and CSAH 1. The Staff reviewed the Agreement
and indicated to the State some minor language changes.
Therefore, Resolution No. 89-109 indicates approval of the Agreement as amended.
As part of the review, the Staff requested the State to review their p
o
l
i
c
y
regarding the cost participation for the free right-turn lanes at
t
h
e
intersection of Anderson Lakes Parkway and TH-169. The State has
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
their policy and will now participate in a larger share of the cost
f
o
r
t
h
e
free right-turn lane construction.
Consequently, the State drafted a Supplement No. 1 to Cooperative
Construction Agreement No. 65705 regarding the revised cost partic
i
p
a
t
i
o
n
.
Therefore, Resolution No. 89-180 will approve Supplement No. 1 to A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
No. 65705 subject to conveyance of right-of-way for Aztec Drive wi
t
h
i
n
1
2
months after completion of the project.
RWR:ssa
DESIGN
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AMENDMENT TO
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT NO.
AGREEMENT
65705
SUPPLEMENT NO. 1
S.P. 2744-43 (T.H. 169=5)
State Funds
Supplement No. 1
to Agreement No. 65705 between
The State of Minnesota
Department of Transportation, and
The City of Eden Prairie
Re: City cost watermain, storm sewer
and bituminous walk construction by
the State on T.H. 169 in Eden Prairie
AMOUNT ENCUMBERED
None)
ESTIMATED AMOUNT
RECEIVABLE
$131,065.53
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between
the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter
referred to as the "State" and the City of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, acting by and through its City Council, hereinafter
referred to as the "City".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS the State and the City did enter into an agreement dated
June 6, 1989, and designated as Agreement No. 65705 providing, in
part, for participation by the City in the costs of the free
right turn lane construction at the intersection of Anderson
Lakes Parkway and Trunk Highway No. 169 to be performed under
State Project No. 2744-43 (P.M. 169=5); and
-1-
ZOA
,4A6L-
65705-1
WHEREAS, at the request of the City, the State has reviewed its
directives regarding the division of cost in cooperative
construction projects with municipalities, and has determined
that it is necessary to delete said participation by the City in
the costs of said free right turn lane construction from
Agreement No. 65705 dated June 6, 1989; and
WHEREAS since Agreement No. 65705 dated June 6, 1989, was fully
executed, the State has awarded the construction contract to
Glenwood Bridge, Inc., the low bidder, and it is now possible to
base the attached construction cost estimate form on contract
unit prices; and
WHEREAS the State and the City desire that Agreement No. 65705
dated June 6, 1989, be Supplemented so that the agreement deletes
the City cost participation for the free right turn lanes at the
intersection of Anderson Lakes Parkway and Trunk Highway No. 169,
and the attached construction cost estimate form is based on the
awarded contract unit prices.
IT IS, THEREFORE, MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
-2-
gCO3
65705-1
ARTICLE I - AMENDMENT OF ARTICLE II OF AGREEMENT NO. 65705
Section A. Amendment of Section A., Paragraph Three
Article II, Section A., paragraph three of Agreement No. 65705
dated June 6, 1989, is hereby amended and modified to read as
follows:
Attached hereto, made a part hereof by reference and marked
'SCHEDULE 'I - Revised for Supplement No..1 to Agreement No.
65705", is a construction cost estimate form which lists all of
the anticipated City cost participation construction items to be
performed hereunder and is based on the low bid unit prices of
Glenwood Bridge, Inc.
Section B. Amendment of Section A.
"CITY COST PARTICIPATION CONSTRUCTION"
Article II, Section A., "CITY COST PARTICIPATION CONSTRUCTION" of
Agreement No. 65705 dated June 6, 1989, is hereby amended and
modified to read as follows:
CITY COST PARTICIPATION CONSTRUCTION
All of the following construction to be performed upon, along and
adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 169 from Engineer Station 257+50
(1030 feet south of County State Aid Highway No. 1) to Engineer
Station 412+52 (Trunk Highway No. 494) within the corporate City
limits under State Project No. 2744-43 (T.H. 169=5). Said
-3-
40'
65705-1
construction to include the City's proportionate share of item
costs for mobilization, field office, field laboratory,
maintenance and restoration of haul roads and traffic control.
100 PERCENT
All of the watermain construction as described and tabulated on
Sheet No. 2 of the attached SCHEDULE "I".
78.5 PERCENT
The 15-inch storm sewer pipe from manhole No. 5120 to catch basin
No. 5117 and to manhole No. 5116, the 36-inch storm sewer pipe
from manhole No. 5116 to catch basin No. 5115, and the 42-inch
storm sewer pipe from catch basin No. 5115 to No. 5113 to No.
5111 to manhole No. 5109 and to apron outlet No. 5127, together
with catch basins No. 5111, No. 5113, and No. 5115 and their
casting assemblies, manholes No. 5109, No. 5116 and No. 5120 and
their casting assemblies, and apron No. 5127 as described and
tabulated on Sheet No. 3 of the attached SCHEDULE "I".
70.8 PERCENT
The 27-inch storm sewer pipe from the inplace storm sewer to
catch basin No. 5315, to No. 5316, to manhole No. 5301, to No.
5302, to catch basin No. 5303 and to apron outlet No. 5304,
-4-
aoos
65705-1
together with catch basins No. 5303, No. 5315 and No. 5316 and
their casting assemblies, manholes No. 5301 and No. 5302 and
their casting assemblies, and safety apron and grate No. 5304 as
described and tabulated on Sheet No. 4 of the attached SCHEDULE
40 PERCENT
All of the bituminous walk construction as described and
tabulated on Sheet No. 5 of the attached SCHEDULE I.
24.0 PERCENT
The 18-inch storm sewer pipe from manhole No. 5219 to No. 5212 to
No. 5220 and to apron outlet No. 5222, together with manholes No.
5212, No. 5219 and No. 5220 and their casting assemblies, and
apron No. 5222 as described and tabulated on Sheet No. 6 of the
attached SCHEDULE "I".
ARTICLE II - PAYMENT BY THE CITY
Article III, Section A. of Agreement No. 65705 dated June 6,
1989, is hereby amended and modified to read as follows:
-5-
65705-1
Section A. Estimate and Advancement of the City's Cost
S
h
a
r
e
It is estimated, for accounting purposes, that the Cit
y
'
s
s
h
a
r
e
of the costs of the construction work to be performed b
y
t
h
e
State hereunder which includes the City's share of the
p
r
o
r
a
t
e
d
item costs plus the 8 percent construction engineering
c
o
s
t
s
h
a
r
e
is the sum of $131,065.53 as shown in the attached Revi
s
e
d
SCHEDULE "I". Said Revised SCHEDULE "I" was prepared
u
s
i
n
g
contract unit prices. The City agrees to advance to
t
h
e
Commissioner of Transportation the sum of $131,065.53
a
s
s
h
o
w
n
i
n
said Revised SCHEDULE "I" forthwith upon execution of
t
h
i
s
agreement and upon receipt of a request from the State
f
o
r
s
u
c
h
advancement of funds.
ARTICLE III - AGREEMENT NO. 65705
Except as amended and modified herein, all of the term
s
a
n
d
conditions set forth in Agreement No. 65705 dated June
6
,
1
9
8
9
,
shall remain in full force and effect.
ARTICLE IV - APPROVAL
Before this supplemental agreement shall become bindin
g
a
n
d
effective, it shall be approved by resolution of the Ci
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
of the City and shall also receive the approval of such
S
t
a
t
e
officers as the law may provide in addition to the Com
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
e
r
of Transportation or his duly authorized representative
.
-6-
t.2007
65705-1
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF the parties hav
e
d
u
l
y
e
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
t
h
i
s
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
b
y
their duly authorized officers and ca
u
s
e
d
t
h
e
i
r
r
e
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
e
a
l
s
t
o
b
e
hereunto affixed. '
(City
Seal)
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By
Date
By
City Administrator
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Recommended for approval:
Date
STATE OF MINNESOTA
By
Mayor
By 44644/
Oh Director - Agreement
' Services Section
Date
Deputy Commissioner
of Transportation
(Date of Agreement)
By
District Engineer
Approved:
By
Department of Administration Deputy Division Director
Technical Services Division
By
Approved as to form and execution:
(Authorized Signature)
Date
By
Special Assistant Attorney General
SCHEDULE "I" Revised for Supplement No. 1 To Agreement No. 65705 City of Eden Prairie Date: April 28, 1989 S.P. 2744-43 (T.H. 169=5) State Funds Revised: July 10, 1989 watermain, Storm Sewer and Bituminous Walk construction performed under State Contract No. 020813 with Glenwood Bridge, Inc. located on T.H. 169 from 1030 ft. south of C.S.A.H. 1 to T.H. 494 in Eden Prairie CITY COST PARTICIPATION Form Sheet No. 2 $ 39,805.01 From Sheet No. 3 52,168.77 From Sheet No. 4 24,725.49 From Sheet No. 5 2,516.30 From Sheet flo. 6 2,141.40 Subtotal $121,356.97 Construction Engineering (8%) 9,708.56 Total $134065.53
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 89-181
RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING
PREPARATION OF 1989 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLS AND SETTING
HEARING DATE
WHEREAS, contracts have been let for the following listed improvement
s
a
n
d
the total project cost, including expenses incurred, or to be incurre
d
a
n
d
the City's share, exclusive of that assignable to City Property, are e
s
t
a
b
-
lished as shown on the attached Exhibit A.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
E
D
E
N
PRAIRIE:
I. The cost of such improvements to be specially assessed are hereby
declared to be those as set forth in Exhibit A.
2. The City Clerk with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be assessed for each
improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land
within the district affected without regard to cash valuation, as
provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the office of the Deputy Clerk for public inspection.
3. A hearing shall be held on the 12th day of September, 1989, in the
Eden Prairie City Hall, 7600 Executive Drive, at 7:30 p.m. to pass
upon such proposed assessments and at such time and place all
persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given
an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessments.
4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing
on the proposed assessments to be published once in the official
newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing.
He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of record of each
parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks
prior to the hearing.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 15, 1989.
Gary D. Petersion, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
ZJO
EXHIBIT A 1989 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS PROJECT TOTAL COST CITY FUNDS AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED 1. I.C. 52-102 Storm Sewer and Street Improvements in $233,311.00 10,898.00 222,413.00 Hidden Glen 3rd Addition. 2. I.C. 52-110 Street Improvements on Golden Triangle $ 74,180.00 -0- 74,180.00 Drive south of West 74th Street. 3. I.C. 52-129 Watermain, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer $252,516.00 -0- 252,516.00 and Street Improvements in the Wyndham Crest Addition 4. I.C. 52-131 Storm Sewer and Street Improvements on $340,025.00 -0- 340,025.00 Hamilton Road. 5. I.C. 52-132 Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, Watermain $350,152.00 11,079.00 339,073.00 and Street Improvements on Franlo Road from Prairie Center Drive to Grier Lane
PAGE 2 OF 2 EXHIBIT A - 1989 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS PROJECT 6. I.C. 52-133 TOTAL COST CITY FUNDS AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED Storm Sewer, Watermain and Sanitary $155,036.00 -0- 155,036.00 Sewer in the Legion Park Plat. 7. I.C. 52-147 Watermain Improvement along County Road 4 and County Road 1 east of Cedar Ridge Estates and west of Staring Lake II. 8. I.C. 52-149 Watermain Improvements along Co. Rd. 1 west of Staring Lake Parkway and east of Staring Lake II. $530,886.00 $ 92,969.00 283,961.00 61,367.00 246,925.00 31,602.00 9. SUPPLEMENTALS Trunk Sewer and Water Subtrunks Lateral Water Lateral Sewer Lateral Exclusion Street Improvements SAC-WAC Connection Fee Weed Removal Bikepath Co. Rd. 4 Special Assessment Agreement $970,776.00 2,253.00 2,960.00 6,503.00 3,938.00 25,405.00 51,570.00 21,093.00 1,488.00 2,598.00 12,272.00
-MEMORANDUM-
TO: Mayor Peterson and Council Members
FROM: Alan Gray, P.E.
City Engineer
DATE: August 10, 1989
RE:
Ridgewood West 6th Addition
Several years ago Centex Corporation developed at residential
s
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
known as Ridgewood West. This subdivision was approved prior to the
determination of the final alignment for Anderson Lakes Park
w
a
y
.
A small triangular--shaped parcel designated Outlot B was created in t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
corner of the Ridgewood West plat and conveyed to the City of
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
a
s
potential right-of-way for Anderson Lakes Parkway. The fina
l
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
Anderson Lakes Parkway was subsequently determined and establi
s
h
e
d
n
o
r
t
h
e
r
l
y
of this location and Outlot B was not used for right-of-way pu
r
p
o
s
e
s
.
Centex Corporation is now reconfiguring the northeasterly
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
Ridgewood West area as a single family residential subdi
v
i
s
i
o
n
t
i
t
l
e
d
Ridgewood West 6th Addition. The attached drawing shows th
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
Outlot 8, Ridgewood West in relation to the right-of-way for
A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
L
a
k
e
s
Parkway and Cumberland Road. Outlot B falls within the rear ya
r
d
a
r
e
a
o
f
L
o
t
23, Block 1, Ridgewood West 6th Addition and is not contiguous
t
o
e
i
t
h
e
r
t
h
e
right-of-way for Anderson Lakes Parkway or Cumberland Road. Ce
n
t
e
x
h
a
s
a
s
k
e
d
that the City of Eden Prairie reconvey Outlot 8, Ridgewood West
f
o
r
i
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
in proposed Lot 23, Block 1, Ridgewood West 6th Addition.
As consideration for the reconveyance of Outlot B, Ridgewood We
s
t
,
C
e
n
t
e
x
h
a
s
agreed to provide additional road easement over Lots 1, 2 and 3
,
B
l
o
c
k
8
a
n
d
Lot 25, Block 4, Fairfield to accommodate future improveme
n
t
s
t
o
C
S
A
H
4
planned by Hennepin County. This will reduce future right-of-wa
y
a
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
cost for CSAH 4 improvements which are shared 50-50 by the Count
y
a
n
d
C
i
t
y
.
Outlot B, Ridgewood West has no residual value to the City fo
r
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
o
r
utility purposes. In consideration of the easements granted b
y
t
h
e
C
e
n
t
e
x
for future CSAH 4 improvements, it is recommended that Outlot
B
,
R
i
d
g
e
w
o
o
d
West be conveyed to Centex for incorporation into Lot 23, Block
1
,
R
i
d
g
e
w
o
o
d
West 6th Addition.
ADG:ssa
go /3
VIN•1,11WMI•2•11111C
L L L. s.
I g fr4
s
N
c!..%
NE Co,. of the NW 1/4,
Sec. 22., rep. 116. Roe. 2E. (H•nnepin Count y Monument).— "••• I\\
I
6%1.10 1r.t.ei
11)\- • 1.).n
• Pi)
r•-•
•••.:‘,V cz.
I / /. .,:••• ,.
...;-; ..., 0 ,/ .. / / / • 0.. e:
...:-. cr -- ..../ /
/ ., • ' n, t .
•••• ' I ,
, N.. 4.•
25
1 .., 1 /
4. l it..
1
./...------- ' 1 •3 • -..;-.. -:-. — -1
''';'1 ir'••
L.
/ / / *
' / '
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: David Lindahl, Assistant Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: July 25, 1989
RE: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CDBG SUBRECIPIENT
AGREEMENTS
All Cities participating in the Urban Hennepin County Communi
t
y
Development Block Grant program (CDBG) are now required to
sign subrecipient agreements annually for each program activity. T
h
e
agreement spells out detailed implementation processes which mu
s
t
be followed relative to each authorized activity. The CDB
G
implementation requirements have not changed, but the method i
n
securing compliance to these requirements have.
Hennepin County cannot disburse any Year XV funds until
t
h
e
agreements are signed by both the County, the recipient, and the
City of Eden Prairie, the subrecipient. Third—party agreements
a
r
e
required between the City and public service agencies (H.O.M.E.
a
n
d
G.M.D.C.A.) receiving CDBG funds.
Both the subrecipient and third party agreements have been revi
e
w
e
d
and found acceptable by the City Attorney.
The attached resolution authorizes execution of the subrecipi
e
n
t
agreements for each Year XV activity by the Mayor and City Manager. Please approve the attached resolution for proper execution of
t
h
e
subrecipient agreements.
A0 16-
Community Development
Block Grant Program
Year XV
, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 89-167
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF NEW SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENTS FOR EACH
PROGRAM ACTIVITY BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AND HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR THE CITY'S
CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, and the County of Hennepin are
required by the Department of Housing and Urban Development to execute subrecipient
agreements, County Contract No. 90707, for all Year XV Community Development Block
Grant activities for the purpose of assuring compliance with all COBB implementation
processes; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, and the Greater Minneapolis
Day Care Association and South Hennepin Human Service Council, both public service
agencies receiving funds from the Year XV allocation, are required by the Department
of Housing and Urban Development to execute third party agreements;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
That new subrecipient agreements between the City and the County, County
Contract No. 90707, be executed for all Year XV COBB activities, effective August
15, 1989, and that new third party agreements between the City and Greater
Minneapolis Day Care Association and South Hennepin Human Service Council be
executed effective August 15, 1989, and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized
to sign the agreements on behalf of the City.
ADOPTED by the City Council on August 15, 1989.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
TOhn D. Frane, City Clerk
MEMO
TO: City Council
FROM:
Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
THROUGH:
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE:
August 10, 1989
SUBJECT:
Time Extension Developer's Agreement Prairie Courts Retail Project
Prairie Courts is a 34,000 square foot strip mall located in the northeast quadrant
of the intersection of Highway #5 and County Road 04 north of the Bank of Eden
Prairie. This project was approved by the City Council in September of 1986. On
August 9, 1988, the developer applied for and received an extension of the
Developer's Agreement to August 5, 1989.
Dennis Gonyea is requesting an 18-month time extension of the Developer's Agreement,
since the developer of the shopping center was unable to obtain construction
financing. The lending institution was unwilling to give construction financing
because of the ongoing highway construction for Highways #4 and #5 which will not be
completed until the fall of 1990.
If the City Council chooses to grant an extension of the Developer's Agreement,
Staff would suggest the following as conditions of the approval:
1. Architecture: The approved building design is a flat roof with a paraphet
wall to screen mechanical unit from the adjoining single family homes to the
north. While this was an acceptable practice in 1986, the City has
approved three other strip malls adjacent to residential areas which have
pitched roof and mechanical equipment is inside of the building. This
provides a better look and better transition to single family homes. The
Staff would suggest that the future developerr. for the Prairie Courts Center
revise architectural plans to contain mechanical equipment inside of the
building and use a pitched roof.
2. County Road 44/Highway /5 Improvements: The existing Developer's Agreement
indicates that prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property,
the developer would submit a letter of credit to the City in an amount equal
to one-half the cost of road improvements to the County Road Highway #5
intersection which included split signal phasing, signal timing, instruction
of right turn lanes on north and south approaches to County Road #4, and
construction of a right turn lane on Wagner Way. Once these improvements
were completed by the Minnesota Department of Tranportation, the developer
would reimburse the City for one-half of the total cost incurred, upon which
the City would release the letter of credit. However, since at this point
It is unlikely that a building permit will be issued prior to the
improvements, the City at this time must pay for the cost of the
improvements up front to be reimbursed later by the developer. The
Engineering Department would recommend that a special assessment agreement
be entered into with the City with assessments to start in September of
1990.
•Pl•N STROH°
TULLY
'ORO W CROUCH
W..1-11407014 1,008-1080,
LAW orr n ces or
STRONG,TULLY, TULLY 6. CROUCH, LTD.
800 AIORWEST MIDLAND BUILDING
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55401
August 8, 1989
TELEPHONE
333-0911
•AUG 9 1989
City of Eden Prairie
Carl Jullie, City Manager
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
RE: OUTLOT A, GONYEA'S 4TH ADDITION
My Client: DENNIS D. GONYEA
Dear Mr. Jullie:
This letter is being sent as a formal request by my
client, Dennis D. Gonyea to the City of Eden Prairie
for an eighteen-month extension of the Developer's
Agreement (dated September 6, 1986) between Dennis
and the City.
Mr. Gonyea has indicated to me that his contract
vendee lost its proposed construction financing for
the project. Mr. Gonyea was informed that one of the
reasons given by the proposed lender was the ongoing
highway construction for highway No. 5. We understand
that this project will be completed by the Fall of
1990 and is the reason why we are requesting this 18-
month extension rather than a one-year extension.
Dennis and the current vendee are also working with
two other developers at this time in order to get
this project constructed.
Your consi3eration is appreciated.
Your very truly,
/
Ralph H. Tully
/cf
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: - July 21, 1989
PROJECT: Outlot A, Crestwood '89
LOCATION: - Northeast Quadrant of Dell Drive, Crestwood Terrace
APPLICANT: Alex Dorenkemper and Richard Wilson
REQUEST: 1. Rezoning of .84 acres from Rural to R1-22.
2. Preliminary Plat of 2.17 acres into 2 lots.
Background
This project was previously reviewed by
` the Planning Commission at the May 8, 1989 /'
meeting as a 3 lot subdivision. This ! i
request was denied by the Planning'
reasons:
,7
Commission and the City Council for the , 7/...`;;,,•:---------:.-i
,... e
-""
1. The proposed subdivision \.)4 ..! s /..
2. The R1-22 Zoning District requires
sewer and water which would not be
available until the year 2000.
3. The proposed subdivision did not
meet Rural zoning requirements. 1
4. The proposed subdivision did not
meet the R1-22 sideyard setback of
15'.
outside of the MUSA line.
4—PROPOSED SITE
5. Adequate access could not b
provided to all lots.
Zoning
A zoning change is requested from Rural to '
R1-22 for proposed Lot 1. Proposed Lot 2
would remain zoned Rural. The R1-22 '
Zoning District has a minimum lot size of
22,000 square feet, minimum frontage of 90 AREA LOCATION MAP
feet, minimum depth of 1(: feet, and a minimum width of (..) feet. Proposed Lot 1
meets the minimum requirements for the R1-22 District. The R1-22 Zoning District
setback requirements are a 30 foot front yard, a 15 foot sideyard (combined sideyard
of 30 feet), and a rear yard setback of 25 feet. Proposed Lot 1 will require a
variance from 15 feet to 10 feet for the existing house on proposed Lot 1. The
proponent has indicated to Staff that the sideyard setback should be 10 feet since
the garage is an accessory structure. If the garage was a detached building, the
Code would require a minimum setback of 10 feet. However, since the garage is
attached to the house, the setback requirement is 15 feet. The proponent may apply
for a setback variance from 15 feet to 10 feet or ask for an interpretation of the
City Code if an attached garage is an accessory structure.
Proposed Lot 2 would remain in the Rural Zoning District and would require variances
for lot size, lot frontage, and lot depth.
The R1-22 Zoning District requires public sewer and water. The existing house is
served by a septic tank system. Proposed Lot 2 will remain in rural zoning and no
building permit will be issued until sewer and water is extended. The owner of the
property will be required to prepare a land hold agreement which stipulates that no
building can occur on this lot until sewer and water is extended.
Access
Proposed Lot 1 would have access off an existing road.
Grading
No grading will be required for this project since no building permit will be issued
for the second lot.
Conclusion
Although the proposed subdivision is outside of the MUSA line, approval of the
rezoning for Lot 1 only, and subdivision into two lots, subject to a land hold
agreement would not result in any additional buildings in the rural area before
sewer and water could be extended. The rezoning and subdivision would be to
accommodate an existing house and clear a title problem between the Wilsons and the
Dorenkempers which would allow for the sale of the house.
Staff Recommendation
The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the request for rezoning for proposed
Lot 1 and subdivision of 2.17 acres into two lots based on plans dated July 21,
1989, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 21, 1989, and
subject to the following conditions:
1. Rezoning from Rural to R1-22 is for proposed Lot 1 only.
2. Apply for and receive Board of Appeals variances for the side lot line
setback in the R1-22 Zoning District.
3. Apply for and receive Board of Appeals variances for the proposed Lot 2 in
the Rural Zoning District.
4. The developer shall enter into a land hold agreement which stipulates that
no building permit will be issued for proposed Lot 2 until public sewer and
water is extended to serve the property.
goa0
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION /189-177
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CRESTWO
O
D
'
8
9
F
O
R
ALEX DORENKEMPER
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as
f
o
l
l
o
w
s
:
That the preliminary plat of Crestwood '89 for Al
e
x
D
o
r
e
n
k
e
m
p
e
r
,
d
a
t
e
d
A
p
r
i
l
2
5
,
1989, consisting of 2.17 acres into two lots, a copy
o
f
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
o
n
f
i
l
e
a
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provi
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
Z
o
n
i
n
g
and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and
i
s
h
e
r
e
i
n
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 15th
d
a
y
o
f
A
u
g
u
s
t
,
1
9
8
9
.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Cletl:
Aoa
•
AUGUST 15.1989
52937 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-UTILITY BILLING 542.85 52938 CREATIVE RIVER TOURS SENIOR TRIP ON MN RIVER/FEES PAID 40.00 APPLE RIVER CAMPGROUND SPECIAL EVENTS/FEES PAID 209.00
t, 40 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 17649.60
52941 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY SERVICE 13357.96
52942 U S WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE 429.50
52943 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 236.76 52944 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 7/21/89 11899.13
52945 FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE PAYROLL 7/21/89 57725.55
52946 BIRTCHER WELSH AUGUST 89 RENT-CITY HALL 19880.79
52947 TOM ALLEN -ENTERTAINMENT-SUNDAY VARIETY IN THE PARK- 60.00
HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION
52948 LIVE THEATRE ENTERTAINMENT NETWOR -ENTERTAINMENT-SUNDAY VARIETY IN THE PARK- 150.00
HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION
52949 DEBBIE BANDHOLZ REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
10.00
52950 ELNOR BETHKE REFUND-DEFENSIVE DRIVING LESSONS
7.00 52951 SUE DAMLO REFUND-T-BALL LEAGUE
13.00 52952 SHARON DALY REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND
19.00
52953 DON & MARY JO EAKLE REFUND-GOLF LESSONS
70.00 52954 MARY JOHNSON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
43.00 52955 RYAN JONES REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
17.00 52956 HELEN JUBERT REFUND-TWINS DAY
7.00 52957 CATHERINE KELLY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
19.00 52958 GRETCHEN LAUBACH REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
15.00
52959 SALLY NATTKE REFUND-TWINS DAY
14.00 52960 ROY MOELLER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
22.00 52961 TRACEY ORR REFUND-GOLF LESSONS
32.00 52962 GALE REINA REFUND-TWINS DAY
7.00 S3 ROBERT STOFFERAHN REFUND-DAY CAMP
45.00 ,64 DIANE VAN EYLE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
54.00
52965 MINNEGASCO SERVICE
705.36 52966 AT&T SERVICE
200.73 52967 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-CITY HALL
5000.00 52968 YELLOW FREIGHT POSTAGE-PARTIAL MOTOR-WATER DEPT
91.19 52969 BETTY WALTON CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES
26.00 52970 USPCA REGION 12 K-9 TRIALS CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT
35.00
52971 SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COU CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES
10.00 52972 DERRICK COMPANIES ENGINEERING CREDITS-HIDDEN GLEN 1ST & 2ND
18151.66 52973 AT&T SERVICE
29.00 52974 MINNEGASCO SERVICE
1333.66 52975 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE
6144.96 52976 CITY-COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 7/21/89
1463.00
52977 CROW WING COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION
186.00 52978 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 7/21/89
27839.26 52979 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 7/21/89
4361.00 52980 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION
194.76 52981 ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION PAYROLL 7/21/89
1468.92 52982 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC AUGUST 89 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM
14425.90 52983 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 7/21/89
25.00 52984 NORWFST BANK HOPKINS PAYROLL 7/7/89 & 7/21/89
1000.00,- 52995 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN AUGUST 89 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM
25912.76' 52986 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 7/21/89
246.50 52987 EAGLE WINE CO WINE
1728.18 5'9 88 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR
9583.08 19 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR LIQUOR
5135.83
24787289
9,09.
AUGUST 15.1989
MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
PRIOR WINE CO
QUALITY WINE CO
JASON-NORTHCO PROP LPill
WESTERN ROOFING
KILLMER ELECTRIC CO INC
CAROL BUCK
SANDRA BUSSEY
GERTRUDE CHERRY
VICKI CIOCHETTO
DREW DALE
CHERYL ERWIN
SHELLEY GOODALL
DEBBIE HANSON
CARI JOHANSEN
SCOTT KOEBELE
MARY KUHL
JOYCE KUYAVA
SCOTT LARSON
WILLIAM & HELEN LOEBL
MARY MATASOVSKY
JANICE MOONEY
KAY MURPHY
PATRICIA NASH
NEW HORIZON CHILD CARE
KATHY NORDAHL
PATRICIA O'CONNELL
ERIC OLSON
GREG OLSON
MARY O'TOOLE
RAINBOW FOODS
PAMELA ROHLER
CHFRICE ROLFSRUD
MAlT SCHERER
JESS SCHWARTZ
KATHY SCHWEBACH
KATHY SCOTT
52990
52991
,F^q92
93
5z994
52995
52996
53010
53011
53012
530130
F '4
.5
53016
53017
53018
53019
53020
53021
53022
53023
53024
53025
53026
53027
53028
53029
53030
53031
53032
53033
53034
53035
53036
53037
53038
53A19
5 ,
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
AUGUST 89 RENT-LIQUOR STORE
ROOF SHINGLES-PARK MAINTENANCE
-REMOVE & REPLACE CONCRETE ITREET LIGHT
POLE-STREET DEPT
ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES
FLAG REPAIR-POLICE DEPT
DICTAPHONE-PLANNING DEPT
-WATER APPROPRIATION PERMIT-FRANLO PARK
IRRIGATION
SERVICE
-ROOF/GUTTERS-HOUSING REHABILITATION
PROGRAM
XEROX PAPER-CITY HALL
SERVICE
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-TWINS DAY
REFUND-SAILING LESSONS
-REFUND-APPLE RIVER TRIP/EVERYBODY'S
BIRTHDAY PARTY
REFUND-RACQUETBALL LESSONS/TWINS DAY
REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS
REFUND-TWINS DAY
REFUND-GOLF LESSONS
REFUND-TWINS DAY
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-RACQUETBALL LESSONS
REFUND-GOLF LESSONS
REFUND-APPLE RIVER TRIP
REFUND-TWINS DAY
REFUND-TWINS DAY
REFUND-SPORTS CAMP
REFUND-SAILING LESSONS
REFUND-BERNE SWISSFEST
REFUND-TWINS DAY
REFUND-GOLF LESSONS
REFUND-COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN DEPOSIT
REFUND-BASIC RESCUE CLASS
REFUND-DAYCARE SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS
REFUND-TWINS DAY
REFUND-TWINS DAY
REFUND-TWINS DAY
REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND
REFUND-ROUND LAKE PAVILION RENTAL
REFUND-RACQUETBALL LESSONS
REFUND-TWINS DAY
REFUND-TWINS DAY
REFUND-SUMMER SPORTS CAMP
REFUND-TWINS DAY
REFUND-MEMBERSHIP FEE
42.50
7844.86
728.28
3651.02
6141.94
64.50
590.02
439.20
16.73
229.43
75.00
37.35
3945.00
293.02
9895.83
14.50
17.00
7.00
14.00
29.00
19.00
26.00
7.00
32.00
7.00
17.00
12.00
32.00
9.00
7.00
14.00
35.40
8.00
20.00
7.00
30.00
50.00
30.00
12.00
16.00
21.00
7.00
7.00
19.00
50.00
24.00
7.00
7.00
28.80
14.00
53.00
52997 MN SUBURBAN PUBLICATIONS
52998 VAUGHN DISPLAY
52999 ECONOMY SYSTEMS INC
53000 MN DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
53001 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV
53002 BOB AND SON'S ROOFING
53003 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY
53004 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
53005 LAUREN ABEL
53006 JANET BAILEY
53007 JAMEL DIES
53008 BECKY BROWN
53009 DEBORAH BOWERS
3470438
RC)
AUGUST 15.1989
53041 KRISTIN SIMONET
53042 SUSAN SORENSON
"43 JO ANN SYVERSON
44 JON R WAGNER
53045 RITA WARD
53046 ANDY WHITE
53047 TYLER YOUNG
53048 LILL1 PUTT
53049 BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC & MFG CO
53050 HOPKINS POSTMASTER
53051 SUPPLEE'S 7 HI ENTER INC
53052 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
53053 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
53054 EAGLE WINE CO
53055 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
53056 PAUSTIS & SONS CO
53057 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
53058 PRIOR WINE CO
53059 DUALITY WINE CO
53060 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC
53061 MPELRA
53062 NORTHLAND ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY
53063 BROWN & CRIS INC
53064 KILLMER ELECTRIC COMPANY
,5 RICHARD KNUTSON INC
NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO
53067 A TO 1 RENTAL CENTER
53068 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC
53069 ADMIRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT INC
53070 AIM ELECTRONICS INC
53071 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS
53072 AIRLIFT DOORS INC
53073 AIRSIGNAL INC
53074 ALEXANDER BATTERY NORTH
53075 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO
53076 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK
53077 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
53078 AMERICAN RED CROSS
53079 ANDON INC
53080 AQUA ENGINEERING INC
53081 ARBUCKLE CONSTRUCTION
53082 ARMOR SECURITY INC
53083 ARTSIGN MATERIALS CO
53084 ASTLEFORD INTL INC
34199110
REFUND-TWINS DAY
REFUND-TWINS DAY
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS/EXERCISE CLASS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-TWINS DAY
REFUND-TWINS DAY
REFUND-TWINS DAY
TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM/FEES PAID
PARTIAL MOTOR-WATER DEPT
POSTAL PERMIT FEE-HUMAN SERVICES DEPT
AUGUST 89 RENT-LIQUOR STORE
-APPLICATION DEPOSIT-ALLOCATION FOR
BONDING AUTHORITY
-APPLICATION DEPOSIT-ALLOCATION FOR
BONDING AUTHORITY
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES
ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS-FIRE DEPT
-SERVICE-CITY WEST PARKWAY EXTENSION/
HAMILTON RD ST & STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
-SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE TRAFFIC
SIGNALS
SERVICE-COUNTY RD #1 & #4 WATERMAIN
SERVICE-FRANLO ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-STREET DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
1500 RECYCLE CONTAINERS-SOLID WASTE MGMT .
SCOREBOARD REPAIR-ICE ARENA-COMMUNITY CTR
-JULY 89 TO AUGUST 90 SECURITY SYSTEM
AGREEMENT-FIRE STATIONS
DOOR REPAIR-FIRE STATION/COMMUNITY CENTER
PAGER SERVICE-POLICE DEPT
BATTERIES-POLICE DEPT
-UNIFORMS-SEWER DEPT/STREET DEPT/EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE/PARK MAINTENANCE
BOND PAYMENT
BOOKS-PLANNING DEPT
-CPR EQUIPMENT RENTAL/BOOKS-POOL LESSONS/
AQUATICS SUPERVISOR
-HELIUM TANK/VALVE RENTAL-JULY 4TH
CELEBRATION
-SPRINKLER HEAD/WIRE CONNECTORS/VALVE/
FITTINGS-PARK MAINTENANCE
REFUND-BUILDING PERMIT DEPOSIT
REPLACE LOCK-PARK MAINTENANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES-PLANNING DEPT
-HOSES/AXLE SHAFT/NUTS/WASHERS/PLUGS/
-MANIFOLD/SUPERCHARGER/GASKETS-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
7.00
14.00
57.00
10.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
41.25
4432.27
60.00
4716.03
5376.58
2521.42
244.47
4331.44
64.68
1401.43
276.32
3668.10
7339.95
95.00
120.12
88807.77
8349.30
41044.47
17082.13
82.85
798.86
7500.00
137.50
625.12
137.50
94.00
89.52
935.36
140112.50
36.30
57.00
171.90
199.63
100.00
103.00
8.85
717.48
aoaq
AUGUST 15.1989
53107 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO
53108 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
53109 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER
53110 COMPUTER PLACE
53111 CONCEPT MICROFILM INC
53112 CONCRETE RAISING INC
53113 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC
53114 CONTACT MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INC
53115 CAL CORNELIUS
53116 CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC
573117 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO INC
53118 D & K PRINTING PLUS INC
53119 WARD F DAHLBERG
53120 DALCO
53121 SANDRA L DANIELSON
53122 CRAIG W DAWSON
53123 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO
53124 DECORATIVE DESIGNS
53125 DEL AIR CONDITIONING INC
57126 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY CE
5 7 '77 DIAMOND ACCEPTANCE
6292631
PAPER HOLDERS-FACILITIES DEPT
SERVICE-DELL ROAD & HERITAGE WATERMAIN
SERVICE-CHASE POINT PROJECT
SERVICE-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
PINS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-SERVICE-RESEARCH & MITCHELL RD STREET
-IMPROVEMENTS/HAMILTON RD/COUNTY RD 4 & 1
WATERMAIN
-FANS/STAGE VALANCES/FLAGS-RECREATION
ADMINISTRATION
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
GRAVEL-STREET MAINTENANCE/PARK MAINTENANCE
JUNE 89 WASTE DISPOSAL
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
SERVICE-STARING LAKE PARK
SEPTEMBER 89 COPIER RENTAL-FIRE DEPT
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT
REFUND-VARIANCE APPLICATION
-REPLACE TRACTOR CRANKSHAFT SEAL/BEARINGS/
-CLUTCH PACK DRUM & BUSHINGS/DISKS/SEAL
RINGS/PISTON-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-WEED CUTTER REPAIR-WATER DEPT/THROTTLE
CABLE/AIR CLEANER/SPRING-PARK MAINTENANCE
LEGAL ADS-STREET & TRAFFIC SIGNS
LAWNCARE-WATER DEPT/SENIOR CENTER
SAILING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
-FLYWHEEL/HOSE/CLUTCH PACK/BEARINGS/CLAMP/
-CLUTCH/WHEEL BALANCING-FORESTRY DEPT/
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE
JULY 89 FUEL TAX
CONTROL CABLE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
TONER-POLICE DEPT
MICROFILMING-ENGINEERING DEPT
CURBING-DRAINAGE CONTROL
SILICONE SEAL-FACILITIES DEPT
RADIO REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-CONNECTIONS/FUSE ADAPTERS/CLIPS/FITTINGS-
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-BRUSH SET-PARK MAINT/CONDENSER/SPARK
-PLUGS/CARBURETOR CONVERSION SET/CABLE
HOSE/AIR FILTER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
PRINTING-OUTDOOR CENTER
JULY 89 EXPENSES-LIQUOR STORES
CLEANING SUPPLIES-FACILITIES DEPT/
SCHOOL-STREET DEPT
JUNE & JULY 89 EXPENSES-ADMINISTRATION
VALVES-WATER DEPT
AUGUST 89 SERVICE-CITY HALL
AIR CONDITIONER REPAIR-FIRE DEPT
AIR TANK LICENSE-POLICE BUILDING
-SEPTEMBER 89 COPIER INSTALLMENT PAYMENT-
POLICE DEPT
40.00
3666.25
1070.05
395.00
228.00
37.15
5050.30
314.00
48.00
676.62
1388.30
7.50
38217.14
182.75
160.00
75.00
2381.72
1E4.12
34.20
148.80
48.00
1032.85
646.86
243.20
47.00
212.00
1241.58
506.25
99.00
204.25
300.00
284.19
269.95
20.60
80.00
942.02
137.08
59.50
803.70
49.50
1083.88
10.00
300.00
53085 BARTLEY SALES COMPANY INC
53086 BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES INC
BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES INC
88 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY
53089 JAMES BITTNER
53090 BOYUM EQUIPMENT INC
53091 BRAUN ENS TESTING INC .
53092 BREDE EXPOSITION SERVICES
53093 ED BRION
53094 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC
53095 BUCKINGHAM DISPOSAL INC
53096 WILLIAM BUFFIE
53097 MATT BULLOCK CONTRACTING CO
53098 BUSINESS CREDIT LEASING INC
53099 CARLSON & CARLSON ASSOC
53100 KUO CHANG
53101 CARLSONS LAKE STATE EQUIP CO
53102 CHANHASSEN LAWN t SPORTS
53103 CHAPIN PUBLISHING COMPANY
53104 CHEMLAWN
53105 LISA CHESLER
53106 CLUTCH & U-JOINT BURNSVILLE INC
go 25
•
AUGUST 15,1999
53128 EUGENE DIETZ JUNE & JULY 89 EXPENSES-ENGINEERING DEPT 53129 DON EVE t SONS SERVICE-MOWING-STREET MAINTENANCE 30 OPT INDUSTRIES INC CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT
f, 31 JOY EASTMAN FIRST AID INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 53132 EDEN PRAIRIE FIGURE SKATING CLUB ICE SHOW EXPENSES-
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
E
V
E
N
T
S
53133 EDINA SW PLUMBING -WATER FOUNTAIN HOSE FAUCET REPAIR-POLICE
DEPT 53134 DEB EDLUND MINUTES-CITY COUNCIL 53135 ELANDER PLUMBING REFUND-PLUMBING PERMIT 53136 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC SAFETY CAP RACK SEAT-STREET MAINT 53137 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC
POSTAGE-PLANNING DEPT 53138 FEED RITE CONTROLS INC CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT
53139 FEIST BLANCHARD CO -CABLE TIES/FLASHERS/BEARINGS/HOSE CLAMPS/
-U-JOINTS/SPRINGS/WATER PUMP/FUEL PUMP/
-SMOG PUMP/FAN CLUTCH/SEALS/CLOCK/HANDLES/
-BUSHINGS/MAINIFOLD SET/GASKETS/RADIATOR
-HOSE/BELTS/HORN RELAY-EQUIPMENT MNTC/
WATER DEPT
53140 FINLEY BROS ENTERPRISES TENNIS NET LATCHES & STRAPS-PARK MNTC 53141 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN OF MN FIRST AID SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 5:142 FLAGHOUSE INC GAME-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND 53143 FORESTRY SUPPLIES INC -SHOULDER HARNESS/TAPE/MAGNIFIER-FORESTRY
DEPT 53144 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STO
R
E
S
53145 STUART FOX SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 53146 G 8 K SERVICES -COVERALLS/TOWELS-WATER DEPT/PARK MAINT/
LIQUOR STORE 53147 GAB BUSINESS SERVICES INC LIABILITY INSURANCE ' '8 DARRELL GEDNEY HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 49 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC RADIO REPAIR-POLICE DEPT
53150 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS CO CARD CABINET-ENGINEERING DEPT 53151 JAMIESON GIEFER SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 53152 JOSEPH GLEASON HOCKEY & SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 53153 GME CONSULTANTS INC SERVICE-HIDDEN GLEN 3RD ADDITION 53154 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SERVIC TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAIN
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
53155 GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC JULY 89 EXPENSES-SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
53156 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 53157 TODD GRAMS MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 53158 ALAN GRAY JULY 89 EXPENSES-ENGINEERING DEPT 53159 GROSS OFFICE SUPPLY CLOCK-POLICE DEPT 53160 ITT COMMERICAL SERVICES INC SERVICE-MOWING-PLEASANT HILLS CEMETERY 53161 LEROY GUBA HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
53162 HACH CO LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 53163 HALVERSON CANDY COMPANY EXPENSES-POOL LESSONS 53164 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC -SERVICE-PIONEER TRAIL & COUNTY RD 18
-DRAINAGE STUDIES/HAMILTON RD/BLUFF RD/
-COUNTY ROAD 4 & PIONEER TRAIL WATERMAIN/
-MEDCOM BLVD/CEDAR RIDGE STORM SEWER/
RIVERVIEW ROAD 53165 JEAN HARRIS MAY & JUNE 89 EXPENSES-COUNCILMEMBER 53166 HAUENSTEIN t BURMEISTER INC DOOR CLOSER-PARK MAINTENANCE 53167 HAYDEN MURPHY EQUIPMENT CO
AIR HOSES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 53168 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER FILING FEE-PLANNING DEPT 9 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER JUNE 89 BOARD OF PRISONERS-POLICE DEPT t ) HENNEPIN TECHNICAL INSTITUTE SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT
5023857
20260
408.50
210.00
10173.77
40.00
375.62
88.00
150,00
12.00
70.20
11.50
1117.95
1802.26
15.50
120.00
23.10
144.49
651.71
189.00
466.46
2450.00
80.00
54.60
63.00
168.00
301.00
1056.60
317.96
1814.67
14.00
126.25
200.00
38.80
265.00
86.00
220.54
117.00
22120.73
400.00
57.50
103.86
482.00
2956.00
675.00
AUGUST 15.1989
53171 HERZOG PETROLEUM
MOTOR OIL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
2258.00
53172 D C HEY COMPANY INC -TONER-WATER DEPT/MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- 60.50
FIRE DEPT
73 11 FIELD MARKING PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE
53174 1n 11111 MEGOHMETER-SEWER DEPT
53175 11 1 11 -COMPRESSOR REPAIR/DEHUMIDIFIER MAINT-ICE
ARENA-COMMUNITY CENTER
53176 ERIC HOLTZE EXECUTIVE RESIDENCE REFUND-REZONING & PLAT FEES
53177 HONEYWELL PROTECTION SERVICES SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE-SENIOR CENTER
53178 HOPKINS BOWL -BOWLING-AFTERNOON ADVENTURE PROGRAM/FEES
PAID
53179 11111 1111 -PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT-WYNDHAM KNOLL PARK/
WILLOW PARK
53180 11 1 -CPR & FIRST AID INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
ROUND LAKE BEACH
53181 11 11 -SEPTEMBER 89 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY
HALL
53182 111 1 1 1. -ADMINISTRATION/BUS SERVICE-SPECIAL TRIPS/
-EVENTS/SPORTS/SPECIAL CAMPS/TEEN WORK
PROGRAM/NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH
53183 INSTY PRINTS OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
53184 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC JULY 89 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT
53185 DEAN R JACOBS EXPENSES/MILEAGE-ASSESSING DEPT
53186 JB LAWN LANDSCAPING & SNOWPLOWING -DRAINAGE DITCH/SOD/GRADING-DRAINAGE
CONTROL
53187 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT
53188 DAVE JOHNSON ENTERTAINMENT-PROGRAM SUPERVISOR/FEES PAID
53189 JOHNSON CONTROLS -REPLACED CONDENSOR FAN MOTOR/CAPACITOR/
THERMOSTAT/PULLEY-COMMUNITY CENTER
179.50
298.07
384.20
1900.00
50.00
25.00
17020.00
40.00
424.32
1697.78
95.00
176.46
155.45
1431.00
40.05
50.00
1574.45
JUSTUS LUMBER CO
53191 KAHNKE BROS INC
53192 KEVIN KASTELLE
53193 JIM KILDAHL
53194 SCOTT A KIPP
53195 KLAMM MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS
53196 KOKESH ATHLETIC SUPPLIES INC
53197 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY
53198 LAKESIDE PLUMBING
53199 ROBERT LAMBERT
53200 LANDSCAPE & TURF
53201 SUE LANE
53202 CYNTHIA LANENBERG
53203 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD
53204 JACK LATZKE
53205 LESMANN ENTERPRISES INC
53206 LIONS TAP
53207 LYMAN LUMBER CO
53208 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC
53209 MASYS CORPORATION
51 M & 1 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC
6277007
-TIMBERS/LUMBER-PARK MAINTENANCE/STARING
LAKE PARK
BLACK DIRT-STREET MAINTENANCE
EXERCISE INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
MILEAGE/EXPENSES-PLANNING DEPT
REFUND-PLUMBING PERMIT
-PITCHERS PLATES/BASKETBALL NETS/288
-SOFTBALLS-4863.76-PARK MNTC/ORGANIZED
ATHLETICS
PISTON PUMPS-FACILITIES DEPT
REPAIR WATER CLOSET-FACILITIES DEPT
JULY 89 EXPENSES-PARK & RECREATION DEPT
SOD-DRAINAGE CONTROL
MILEAGE-ELECTIONS
MILEAGE-FIRE DEPT
FEBRUARY & MARCH 89 LEGAL SERVICE
LICENSE FEE-STREET MAINTENANCE
-REPAIR & PAINT POLICE VEHICLES-EOUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
TREATED TIMBERS-PARK MAINTENANCE
SWEEPER BROOMS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
-HANDCLEANER/NUMBER STAMPS SET -EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
623.36
40.00
163.80
210.00
6.90
792.50
989.51
48.59
283.85
200.00
174.00
37.00
54.00
29667.86
7.50
697.00
102.29
48.00
498.00
220.00
46.13
apai
53244 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
53245 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
53246 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
53247 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
-PRINTING-SUNBONNET DAY FLYERS-HISTORICAL
AND CULTURAL COMMISSION
-CEMENT-STREET MAINT/PARK MAINT/STARING
LAKE PARK
STEEL PLATE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-PAINT/PAINT ROLLER COVERS/BRUSHES-
COMMUNITY CENTER
TENNIS & GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
-MEDICAL IDENTIFICATION BANDS-SPECIAL
TRIPS/EVENTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
ID CARD PLATE-FIRE DEPT
BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE
-AUGUST 89 PAGER SERVICE-SEWER DEPT/WATER
DEPT/POLICE DEPT/FIRE DEPT
-CLEANING SUPPLIES/EXTINGUISHER
RECHARGING/FITTING-FIRE DEPT
ON DUES-HUMAN RESOURCES
LEGAL ADS-CIVIL DEFENSE
ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES
STRAINERS/CAPS/TIPS-PARK MAINTENANCE
PRINTING FORMS-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION
RADIO REPAIR-FIRE DEPT
SWITCHES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
STROBE LIGHT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
T SHIRTS-YOUTH ATHLETICS
IN EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES
PIN-PARK MAINTENANCE
SKATING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
BOND PAYMENT
SLING/LDADBINDER-STREET MAINTENANCE
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-EXPENSES/MILEAGE-ROUND LAKE BEACH/RILEY
LAKE BEACH
GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY-HUMAN RESOURCES
-SERVICE-PARK & RECREATION DEPT/PLANNING
DEPT
RECEPTACLE REPAIRS-POLICE BUILDING
-INSECT SPRAY/STAPLES/GAS CAN/SCREWS/DRILL
-BITS/BATTERIES/HOOKS/CHAIN LINK/CHAIN
-RUSTPROOFING/LIGHT BULBS/GASKETS/WEED
SPRAY-PARK MAINTENANCE
-PLUG/CLEANING SUPPLIES/STAPLES/BRACKETS-
POLICE DEPT
-BATTERIES/HINGES/MEASURING TAPE/WRENCH
SET/SOCKET SET-SEWER DEPT
-GARDEN HOSE/LIGHT BULBS/BOLTS/CLEANING
-SUPPLIES/SCRUB BRUSH/PAINT THINNER/
-MASKING TAPE/PAINT BRUSHES/PAPER TOWELS/
PLATES-STREET DEPT
-SPRAYER/BATTERIES/KEYS/KNIVES/PRUNING
-SHEAR/FITTINGS/HACKSAW/CONNECTIONS/WIRE
BRUSH/WEED SPRAY-WATER DEPT
53211 MBA DESKTOP PUBLISHING PLUS
53212 MCFARLANES INC
'7 713 MCNEILUS STEEL INC
.14 MERLINS HARDWARE HANK
53215 DAVID G MEYER
53216 METHODIST HOSPITAL
53217 METRO PRINTING INC
53218 MID CO SECURITY SYSTEMS INC
53219 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
53220 MINNESOTA COMMUNICATIONS CORP
53221 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
53222 MN PUBLIC EMPLOYER LABOR RELATI
53223 MN SUBURBAN PUBLICATIONS
53224 MN SUBURBAN PUBLICATIONS
53225 MINNESOTA WANNER CO
53226 MINUTEMAN PRESS
53227 MOTOROLA INC
53228 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
53229 GREGORY J MUELLER '
53230 MUNICILITE CO
53231 NATIONAL SCREENPRINT
53232 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE
53233 NORTH STAR TURF INC
53234 BETH NILSSON
75 NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA N A
.36 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC
53237 HARRY ORTLOFF
53238 JENNIFER PAYNE
53239 DANIEL PERNULA
53240 PERSONNEL DECISIONS INC
53241 PERSONNEL POOL
53242 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC
53243 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
45.00
200.00
518.18
60.23
384.75
147.88
139.00
185.00
1037.79
916.25
367.20
85.00
22.02
146.40
24.36
175.27
1013.42
56.25
48.00
76.64
414.50
46.62
22.79
528.26
869428.09
68.36
405.00
149.55
567.00
80.65
1838.98
42.95
105.84
24.00
64.78
333.27
316.65
08593
53248 THOMAS PRENDERGAST SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
53249 PRENTICE HALL INC BOOKS-FACILITIES DEPT
53250 PRINT GALLEY INC -PRINTING-1D CARDS-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT/
BUSINESS CARDS-SEWER DEPT
r 51 R & R SPECIALTIES INC -ZAMBONI BLADES SHARPENED-ICE ARENA-
COMMUNITY CENTER
53252 REED'S SALES & SERVICE INC 2 WEED TRIMMERS-PARKS DEPT
53253 RICHARDS ASPHALT COMPANY BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE
53254 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC -SERVICE-MITCHELL ROAD PAVING & UTILITIES
FEASIBILITY STUDY/COUNTRY GLEN
53255 ROAD RESCUE INC FIRST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT
53256 ROLLINS OIL CO GAS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
53257 ROGER'S SERVICE CO -STARTER it ALTERNATOR REPAIRS/STARTERS/
ALTERNATORS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
53258 ROOT 0 MATIC FLOOR DRAIN SERVICE-LIQUOR STORE
53259 RYANS RUBBER STAMPS RUBBER STAMP-ASSESSING DEPT
53760 S&S ARTS & CRAFTS KEY CHAINS-NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH PROGRAM
53261 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO EXPENSES-NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH PROGAM
53262 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS INC GAMES/TOYS-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND
5326: SANCO INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
53264 THE SANDWICH FACTORY INC EXPENSES-PARK & RECREATION DEPT
53265 TIM SATHER EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
53266 SCHMIDT READY MIX INC CEMENT-STREET MAINTENANCE
53267 THE SHERMAN WILLIAMS CO -PAINT/PAINT THINNER/ROLLER COVER-PARK
MAINTENANCE
53268 J L SHIELY COMPANY GRAVEL-STREET MAINTENANCE
53269 STEVEN R SINELL CONFERENCE/EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT
53270 LOREN L SKELTON GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
53271 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP -DRILL/DRILL BITS/FILES/TEST LIGHT-
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
' '2 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC -EXPENSES-ROUND LAKE BEACH/TEEN WORK
-PROGRAM/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION/SPECIAL
EVENTS
53273 TOM SOPCZYK MILEAGE/EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES
53274 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC -LEGAL ADS-PLANNING DEPT/ADVERTISING-
LIQUOR STORES
53275 SPECIALTY SCREENING PLAQUE-FIRE DEPT
53276 SPORTS WORLD USA -UNIFORMS-PARK RANGER/CONCESSION STAND
-SUPPLIES/RACQUETBALL RACQUETS-COMMUNITY
CENTER
53277 STEMPF AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES INC COIL SPACERS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
53278 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EC -AMMUNITION/15 FLASHLIGHT CHARGERS-
-$1214.25/SWITCHES-POLICE DEPT/EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
53279 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 89 CHEVROLET BLAZER-FIRE DEPT
53780 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 2ND HALF 89 MEMBERSHIP FEE
53281 SULLIVANS SERVICES INC WASTE DISPOSAL-OUTDOOR CENTER
5:282 SUPPLEE ENTERPRISES INC OUTDOOR CORD-LIQUOR STORE
53283 TARGET STORES TOYS-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION
53284 TOWN t COUNTRY DODGE -VEHICLE REPAIR-$1195.00-WATER DEPT/
STRAINER/HOSE/BELT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
53285 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS INC MARKERS-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND
53286 TURF PRO INC MOWING-FORESTRY DEPT
53297 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-FIRE DEPT
60.00
60.46
373.50
69.00
678.00
660.00
4004.75
111.06
6361.04
399.27
48.50
16.00
17.95
8.93
85.20
23.15
61.06
118.02
447.34
134.21
959.08
358.25
283.50
244.56
49.73
20.50
1069.24
50.50
279.65
98.03
1516.65
15363.72
700.00
26.49
59.76
1226.20
11.78
625.00
396.57
3879
a02 01
AUGUST 15.1989
53288 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
53289 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC
f-"90 THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE
( 71 UNIVERSAL SERVICE CENTER INC
to292 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC
53293 VIDEOTRONIX INC
53294 WATER PRODUCTS CO
53295 WEST WELD
UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT
SCREW/WASHERS/SNAP PINS-EQUIPMENT MNTC
VIDEO CASSETTE-PLANNING DEPT
BATTERIES-SEWER DEPT
CAR RENTAL-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
-I 1/2 MEASURING CHAMBER/GASKETS-WATER
-DEPT/TEST GAUGE-PARK DEPT/800 ROLLS OF
WOVEN FABRIC-$440.00-STREET MAINTENANCE
-LENS/GRINDING WHEELS/WELDING SUPPLIES/
-CUTTING ATTACHMENT/CUTTING TIP-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
504.92
265.54
63.50
38.40
73.50
118.00
674.10
337.04
53296 WESTERN CARPET DRY CLEANING SERVI CARPET CLEANING-COMMUNIT
Y
C
E
N
T
E
R
53297 TIM WHALEY TENNIS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 53298 DAVID WHITEFORD SOFTBALL COORDINATOR/FEES PAID
53299 WILSON TANNER GRAPHICS BUSINESS CARDS-FACILITIES DEPT
53300 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FIRST AID SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/COMMUNITY CTR
53301 EARL ZENT EXPENSES/MILEAGE-ASSESSING DEPT
52729 VOID OUT CHECK
52799 VOID OUT CHECK
52840 VOID OUT CHECK
52924 VOID OUT CHECK
51084 VOID OUT CHECK
209765
248.60
236.25
384.00
45.00
171.95
209.33
229.43'
590.42'
335.00-
17.63-
100.00-
$1721825.69
A0,30
-MEMORANDUM-
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, P.E.
Director of Public Works
DATE: August 10, 1989
RE: MITCHELL LAKE NORMAL WATER ELEVATION
(I.C. 52-075)
At the June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting, two primary issues were di
r
e
c
t
e
d
to Staff for further investigation. First of all, we were asked to r
e
v
i
e
w
the proposed elevation as it relates to the proposal to construct a hi
k
e
w
a
y
/
bikeway trail along the west edge of Mitchell Lake. In response to
t
h
a
t
concern, cross sections at selected intervals adjacent to the lake o
n
U
.
S
.
Homes property were generated. The results show that virtually any in
c
r
e
a
s
e
in water elevation will result in displacement of the trail to a side
-
s
l
o
p
e
that will necessitate an extensive retaining wall system. Due t
o
t
h
e
extensive and destructive amount of grading necessary to provide
t
h
i
s
construction and the prohibitive costs associated with the retaining wa
l
l
,
i
t
is being recommended that other alternatives be pursued to provide pedes
t
r
i
a
n
access to selected points along the shoreline. Parks Director Lambert
w
i
l
l
be available at the Council Meeting to address this issue in more detail
.
Two residents on South Bay Curve -- Robert Pitel and David Knaak -- app
e
a
r
e
d
before the Council and stated their opposition due to the probabili
t
y
o
f
additional tree loss on their property. Our survey crew staked the
8
7
0
.
0
current elevation and the 871.5 proposed elevation in each of their ya
r
d
s
.
The Knaak property would have little if any tree loss and the Pitel pro
p
e
r
t
y
would potentially loose a clump of willow trees. The interesting detail
t
h
a
t
we discovered is that the 871.5 elevation falls within a drainage and
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
easement that was established for both the purpose that we are propo
s
i
n
g
a
n
d
as a preservation easement area to prevent modifications along the la
k
e
s
h
o
r
e
.
As a result of these investigations and other previous information g
a
t
h
e
r
e
d
for the June 20, 1989 Council Meeting, there does not appear to be an
y
o
v
e
r
-
riding reason to maintain the lake level at a depressed elevation
.
I
d
i
d
however discuss many of these issues with the DNR and they sugges
t
t
h
a
t
setting the Normal Ordinary High Water elevation (NOHW) exactly a
t
8
7
1
.
5
would be difficult for them to accept. The State deems that they
o
w
n
a
l
l
land below that elevation, but do not have any rights of encroachmen
t
a
b
o
v
e
that elevation. Therefore, maintaining some nominal level below 8
7
1
.
5
t
o
accommodate at least some small storm fluctuation in the elevat
i
o
n
i
s
advisable. I am therefore recommending that the level be set at 8
7
1
.
3
t
o
accommodate this concern. We have drainage and utility easements over
m
o
s
t
o
f
the developed area which would accommodate a flood elevation above 871
.
5
,
b
u
t
we do not have those rights as yet on the undeveloped parcels. W
e
w
i
l
l
obtain those easements as development progresses, but it is more likel
y
t
h
a
t
we can achieve success with the DNR if we have at least a small abil
i
t
y
t
o
fluctuate the lake level without encroachment. I will have some gr
a
p
h
i
c
s
available at the August 15, 1989 Council Meeting to demonstrat
e
t
h
i
s
information.
EAD:ssa
cc: Bob Lambert
Alan Gray
2031
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 89-186
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie received a request from the Southwest Corridor
Transportation Coalition for a $10,000 contribution to assist in financing its on-going
programs; and
WHEREAS, the Coalition has been working to secure the earliest possible construction
of proposed new T.H. 212 and widening of T.H. 5 from Interstate 494 to T.H. 41; and
WHEREAS, the Coalition has been very active the last three years not only in this
effort but, has also achieved the following:
1. Facilitated the Joint Powers Agreement among Eden Prairie,
Chanhassen, Chaska, Carver County, Hennepin County and MnDOT
relating to funding of the EIS on new T.H. 212;
2. Lobbied the Legislature for increased transportation funding;
3. Lobbied MnDOT for project programming;
4. Supported a Joint Powers Agreement among Chanhassen, Chaska
and Carver County to jointly study the highway network
ancillary to T.H. 41 and U.S. Highway 212; and
5. Hired a full-time coordinator to work on its behalf.
WHEREAS, in the next year, the Coalition will be working to secure a
Federal grant or other funding for the design of new T.H. 212 from 1-494 to Norwood and t
maintain the oversight and commitment to construct the widening of T.H. 5 from Wallace
Road to T.H. 41; and
WHEREAS, in order to finance these efforts, the Coalition is requesting contribution
from Chaska, Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Carver County, and Hennepin County in the amount o
$10,000 each.
NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota hereby supports the role of the Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition and
approves the request for a contribution of $10,000 to assist in financing its ongoing
programs;
AND BE ST FURTHER RESOLVED that the funds for this contribution be appropriated from
the undesignated balance of the General Fund and disbursed only on the conditions that th
cities of Chanhassen and Chaska and the counties of Carver and Hennepin participate with
financial commitments equal to that of the City's, and that private contributions
totalling $40,000 be secured by the Coalition.
ADOPTED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL this 15th day of August, 1989.
Mayor Gary D. Peterson
SEAL
JC0In D. Frane, City Clerk
203 2
August 9, 1989
Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition
Proposed Budget
September 1989 - October 1990
Expenses
Field Coordinator
Office
Expenses
Governmental Affairs
Federal
State
Local
Transportation-Consulting
Engineering Services
General Operating Expenses
Miscellaneous
Reserve
Income
Government Contributions
Hennepin County
Carver County
City of Eden Prairie
City of Chanhassen
City of Chaska
Private Contributions
Industry
Community Organizations
Chamber of Commerce
Individual
$30,000
$25,000
$15,000
$10,000
$80,000
$10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
$40,000
$90,000
Ao 33
SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR TRANSPORTATION COALITION
MAJOR PROGRAMS
Highway 5 Upgrade
TH 212 Design Funding
TH 212 First Phase
Programmed 1993
$34MM
TN 212/Prairie Center Drive Interchange
Design Funding $250K
Highway 5 - County Rd. 17 to County Rd. 41
4 lanes - Programming 1994-5
TN 212 - Second & Third Phase
Programming - $ 64MM
9,03(4
AREA LOCATION MAP
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Scott A. Kipp, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
July 21, 1989
Starring Highlands
Northwest corner of Ridge Road and East Staring Lane
Cliff and Mary Anderson
Preliminary Platting of 2.17 acres into 3 lots.
Background
The Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts this
site and surrounding sites for Low Density
Residential land use. The property was
zoned R1-22 in 1969 as part of Ordinance
#135. Surrounding properties consist of
the Gopher Lane Addition to the north,
Staring Lake 1st Addition to the south,
and additional single family housing to
the east and west all zoned R1-22. The
site and the surrounding sites are not
served by City sewer and water, rather, by
the use of on-site drain fields and wells.
Both Ridge Road and East Staring Lane are
gravel surfaced roadways at this time.
Preliminary Plat
The request is to plat 2.17 acres into 3
single family lots at a density of 1.38
units per acre. The Guide Plan would
allow up to 2.5 units per acre in the Low
Density Residential classification. Lots
range in size from 22,048 square feet to
44,100 square feet. All lot size, width,
and depth requirements meet City Code.
The existing house on lot 3 shall remain
as part of this platting request.
However, with a 28.4 foot frontyard
setback from Ridge Road, a variance will
be necessary. City Code requires a
minimum setback of 30 feet. In addition,
City Code requires that frontyard setbacks
203S
for new construction equal or exceed the average setback of stru
c
t
u
r
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
surrounding area if 40% or more of the block has been developed. Thi
s
a
v
e
r
a
g
e
h
a
s
been calculated to be 46 feet. The proposed units along East Starrin
g
L
a
n
e
e
x
c
e
e
d
this setback requirement. The proposal for Lot 1 indicates that an a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
o
t
division may take place at some future date. Site lines for access to
E
a
s
t
S
t
a
r
r
i
n
g
Lane are adequate.
Grading
The site currently slopes in a northerly direction from an elevation
o
f
9
0
3
a
l
o
n
g
Ridge Road to 850 in the northwest corner. The average slope across t
h
i
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
is 25%. A tree inventory has been provided which indicates all signifi
c
a
n
t
t
r
e
e
s
t
o
occupy lot 3 and to remain as part of the development. Some scattered
b
i
r
c
h
,
w
i
l
l
o
w
and elm trees may be lost due to construction. However, these trees are
n
o
t
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
to the Tree Preservation Policy. The proposed grading is lim
i
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
construction of house pads and drainfields. Some grading is propose
d
a
t
a
2
.
5
:
1
slope. The grading plan shall be revised not to exceed a 3:1 slope.
Utilities
Since this property was zoned R1-22 prior to July 1, 1982, City sewe
r
a
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
service is not required. City Code states that sanitary sewer and w
a
t
e
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
shall not be required with respect to those lands which were situated wi
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
R
1
-
22 zoning district on or before July 1, 1982. The proponent plans inst
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
drainfields and wells, meeting setback and separation requirements. Sewe
r
a
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
trunk lines currently exist somewhat close to this area. The Red Rock
i
n
t
e
r
c
e
p
t
o
r
traverses through the Boulder Pointe site 1500 feet to the north. City
w
a
t
e
r
r
u
n
s
along County Road 1 from Mitchell Road 700 feet to the south. Improveme
n
t
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
roadways and City services to this neighborhood, are not proposed at t
h
i
s
t
i
m
e
b
y
the City. However, the Engineering Department indicates that improveme
n
t
s
m
a
y
n
o
t
be too far off in the future.
Drainage
This site is part of an overall landlocked watershed area. A natura
l
o
v
e
r
l
a
n
d
outlet exists at an elevation of 867 just to the east of East Sta
r
i
n
g
L
a
n
e
.
T
o
insure against the possibility of flooding, all proposed housing has
b
e
e
n
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
with the lowest basement opening two feet above this natural overl
a
n
d
o
u
t
l
e
t
.
A
n
analysis has been made to determine the potential flood elevation
f
o
r
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
Based on a worse case scenario of an 8 inch storm event with 100%
r
u
n
o
f
f
a
n
d
n
o
percolation, the analysis indicated a flood elevation of 861.4 whi
c
h
i
s
a
l
m
o
s
t
7
feet below the natural outlet elevation. However, standing wat
e
r
h
a
s
r
a
r
e
l
y
occupied the site in the past. Because the northwest corner of thi
s
s
i
t
e
i
s
t
h
e
lowest elevation of the drainage area, and that additional filling wil
l
d
i
m
i
n
i
s
h
t
h
e
sites water storage capacity, the proponent shall be required to plac
e
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
e
r
l
y
110 feet of the future lotting area into a drainage easement,
c
o
n
f
o
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
approximately the 852 contour. This will provide an area free of
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
o
r
other improvements for the storage of possible storm water run-off.
As indicated earlier, the proponent may wish to subdivide Lot 1 in
t
h
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
,
providing for another unit. The basement elevation of this unit is cu
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
s
h
o
w
n
to be below the natural overland elevation of 867 and the indicated fl
o
o
d
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
of 861.4. The design for this house is being based on provisions for
a
f
u
t
u
r
e
s
t
o
r
m
69,036
sewer outlet system to establish a lower drainage elevation. Since it is not known
at this time when or if a storm sewer will be installed, or at what elevation, a
detailed review of this future lot cannot be made. When the proponent requests a
split for lot 1, the future proposed basement elevation will need to be raised to an
elevation two feet above the outlet elevation that exists at the time.
Staff Recommendations
Staff would recommend approval of the request for preliminary plat of 2.17 acres
Into 3 single family lots within the R1-22 district based on the plan dated 7-14-89,
and subject to the following:
1. Prior to City Council review, proponent shall:
A. Revise the grading plan so that no slope exceeds a 3:1 ratio.
B. Place the westerly 110 feet of the future lotting area into a
drainage easement, corresponding to approximately the 852 contour.
2. Prior to final plat, proponent shall:
A. Submit storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by
the Watershed District and City Engineer.
3. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Pay the cash park fee.
B. Submit plans to the Building Department for the installation of the
drainfields and well systems.
4. As part of home construction, each unit shall meet or exceed the 46 foot
average frontyard setback that has been established in the area.
5. When the opportunity for City water and sewer connections become available,
each of the units shall hook-up to this system at a time when this specific
on-site systems require repair.
6. If proposed lot 1 is requested to be subdivided in the future, a preliminary
plat of the property shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning
Commission and City Council.
ao3'i
Li EWOH
PLANNING DEPT
JUL 2 11989
CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE
•
CC Cliff and Mary Anderson
ao.31
Peter J. Kfia6b1c, P.E.
RON IMECER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Since
+.1
Engineering 1 =
.. ............... Land Surveying '.7.7-Itlalcr'Z, r.T.,7.:7.:7.-Y-7:7-r:Z7:T7: ArchitectureT: rt
Planning Ron Krueger
Associates, Inc.
8080 Wallace Road
Eden Prattle, Minnesota 59344
(612) 934-4242
July 19, 1989
Mr. Scott Kipp
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Re: Starring Highlands
RKA# 8112
Dear Scott:
Per your recent comments, we have revised the Preliminary Plat for th
e
a
b
o
v
e
referenced project as shown on the attached sheets. Lot 1 shows future
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
a
house location for a lot that could be split off in the future when a stor
m
s
e
w
e
r
i
s
available for the landlocked area to the northwest. As shown on the pl
a
n
,
L
o
t
s
1
a
n
d
2
as proposed have lowest house openings at least two feet above the emerg
e
n
c
y
overland flow elevation of 866.8.
A drainage and utility easement is shown over the existing low area to t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
.
The attached drainage computations show that an 80" spring snowm
e
l
t
e
v
e
n
t
(
8
"
o
f
water, 100% runoff, no perculation) would have a flood elevation of
8
6
1
.
4
.
T
h
i
s
i
s
7
.
6
'
below the lowest proposed house opening.
If you have any questions or comments, please call.
V----."c '..*•-r- i.._Cre=027 1'7 :..1.,:.+.1'..- :
,,,,, , 11 4 t i , .c... .. .
I , _..,.....,?.. ,..f.,..• L.., . ._?-,-,, • , ! 1 c.' •
,
-7 ,
1 !
14.41,,G,c;C)
3 -4- 1 I 1 ; I
'L 5.5S
, •
•. . .2,14 ,?c,c7
:
11 • 1- . , ,
. .
I
_
22.3 1,.c19'9ip=c> 9,
1 ;
4 . •
, 7
. . -2. f • _ ,n_.)
I
2-' ! I 4p2D'
, .
I
I _ . I
2°,39
PAGE OF
J00 0
JOB NAME
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
DESIGN DATA
71-':•:r' A •)4n1.)
Enowerms
len•nien a.ae,nuna sur.wine >71IN5ICIN
MUM AINIOnn
Inn ME. Jvcatawsommovisamara.roewimp...,..11A1 /WW1* .41n16•81/Claiailall
R. Innen
• niannin
9 ' A, DATE
DATE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #89-176
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF STARRING HIGHLANDS FOR
CLIFF AND MARY ANDERSON
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Starring Highlands for Cliff and Mary An
d
e
r
s
o
n
,
d
a
t
e
d
August 7, 1989, consisting of 2.17 acres into three lots, a copy of wh
i
c
h
i
s
o
n
f
i
l
e
at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provision
s
o
f
t
h
e
E
d
e
n
Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, a
n
d
i
s
h
e
r
e
i
n
approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 15th day of August, 198
9
.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Cleik
Acm0
MEMORANDUM
TO : MAYOR PETERSON & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM:
JEAN JOHNSON, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: AUGUST 7, 1989
RE : VARIANCE REQUEST #89-36
The Board of Adjustment and Appeals approved Variance Request #89-36 with amendments. The applicant requested a 11' rear yard setback. The Boa
r
d
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
a
17 rear yard setback. City Code requires a 20' rear yard setback.
The Board felt a 20 foot addition is larger than the typical 14 X 14 +
f
o
o
t
d
e
c
k
o
r
porch that is built onto most homes. The Board considered the shape of
t
h
e
l
o
t
a
s
a
hardship, but could not approve the degree of variance being requeste
d
.
T
h
e
r
e
f
o
r
e
,
the Board approved a modified variance requiring the addition to be 17
f
e
e
t
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
rear lot line. This allows an addition 14 feet X approximately 30 feet
.
JJ:mmr/VR8936
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW FILE
- VARIANCE REQUEST #89-36 -
CONTENTS
1. Request letter dated August 4, 1989
2. Variance Request, Public Hearing Notice
3. Variance Application
4. Letter dated June 6, 1989
5. Survey indicating proposed deck location
6. Interior/exterior plans
7. Final Order #89-36
8. Staff Report dated July 7, 1989
9. Unapproved Board minutes, dated July 7, 1989
SD:mmr/CCRF8936
Auta
August 4, 1989
Bradley Kuyper
16534 So. Manor Rd.
Eden Prairie, MN 55346
Dear Ms. Johnson,
This letter is to inform you that I wish to appeal the
decision made by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals on
July 13, 1989 concerning variance request 89-36. This
variance request was to build a deck within Ilft. of my rear
lot line. I have been in contact with Councilman Doug Tenpas
who came to my house to look at what I wanted to do. He
discussed my request with the other council members at the
council meeting on August 1, 1989 and asked me to get it on
the agenda for the next council meeting on August 15th. If
there is any problem in doing this please give me a call.
Sincerely ,
Y247u.--
Bradle Y Kuyper
Work 4 830-7374
Home II 937-5206
abt13
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
REGARDING VARIANCE REQUEST
#89-36
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Appeals and Adjustments will meet
at the following time and places:
7:30 PM
Thursday, July 13, 1989
At the Council Chambers, 7600 Executive Drive, Eden Prairie
City Hall, Eden Prairie, MN 55344
to review and consider the variance request #89-36, submitted by Bradley P.
Kuyper for property located at 16534 SouiFignor Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, legally described as: LOCET -15-01S711Mber Creek Wo ods 2nd Addition. Therequest is for a variana7Vom Ciir-C_,_ode Chapter TI: r 17-c—t-f--oni,.1707 Subdivision 2 -7 additi5171-11 . from thi 751 line. City Code requires720'.
Written or oral comments relating to this variance request will be heard at
this meeting. Said variance application is on file for public review at
the Planning Department at Eden Prairie City Hall.
Published in the Eden Prairie News
City of Eden Prairie June 28, 1989
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
gotiq
Applican&Zture • Vee Owner igna re (Land Owner)
d,dg
Variance #
Receipt #_
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
VARIANCE REQUEST APPLICATION
jum c
APPLICANT'S NAME:
ADDRESS:
PHONES:
REQUEST FOR
VARIANCE AT:
K,iyper '
krs-1 ,1
Work 830 -73 7-1 Home 61 -; S .206
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: L'T 11 , glocik 71h 6,,e4 2.1
FEE: A) $75.00 - Residential - (includes building additions, decks, and Code interpretations)
8) $125.00 - Other - (includes variances associated with office, industrial, commercial
property and variances associated with new development/construction)
REASON FOR VARIANCE: Prrek_ 1,41 Cow eS (AATIAI, eituv,, d
Pea:- kr ,
Submission Requirements:
1` Residential - 8 1/2" x 11" survey showing lot lines and setbacks of existing and proposed
tures and location of buildings on adjoining properties. Also show building elevations,
ar,itectural floor plans, and pertinent topographical features such as trees, fences, berms
,
steep slopes, ponds, roads, and existing and proposed elevations, which have bearing on th
e
variance request.
2) Other - 8 1/2" x 11" survey showing lot lines and setbacks of existing and proposed
structures. Where surveys are larger than 8 1/2" x 11", 7 copies of site plan folded to 8 1/2"
x 11" will be required. Also include landscape plan, pertinent topographical features such a
s
trees, fences, berms, steep slopes, ponds, roads, and exiting and proposed elevations, which
have bearing on the request.
3) Letter addressed to Board of Adjustments and Appeals, explaining nature of variance request
and reason(s) why conformance to the literal provisions of the City's code would cause hardship.
3.
Notes to Applicant:
1. The Board meets on the 2nd Thursday of the month, 7:30 p.m., City Hall Council Chambers,
7600 Executive Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
2. Applications must be filled, no later than 2nd Thursday of the month previous to the
meeting date.
Notices are published in the Eden Prairie News and mailed to property owners within 500
feet. Applicants are encouraged to personally contact adjacent property owners, Prior
to the hearing, in order to explain the variance and to be prepared to address their
concerns at the hearing.
**NOTE: SUBMIT 9 COPIES FOLDED TO 84" X 11" OF ANY SITE PLANS OVER 84" X 11"
'
June 6, 1989
Bradley and Bambi guyper
16534 So. Manor Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55346
Dear Board of Adjustments and Appeals,
We are requesting a variance that would allow us to
build a deck that would come within eleven feet of our rear
lot line. The reason the deck will come so close to the lot
line is that the rear of our house is only 31 ft. from our
lot line. This means that if we were to comply with the 20
ft. standard setback our deck could extend only eleven ft.
from our house. The deck we would like to build would be
attached to the main floor of the house in the rear where a
sliding glass door already exists. There is not any other
location on our house where we could build and still have
access to this door. The portion of the deck that would
extend 20 ft. would be converted to a screened porch in the
future.
We have discussed our plans with all of our neighbors
behind and to the sides and none of them have any problem
with it.
Sincerely,
404--
Bradley Kuyper
NJTICI •
till told lath elt.watl,.o o•-! e ,' and Will, sir vl:f
ptic,t d.s,:i n s• footin* fullJer
s r for probk nts
t.toolti,t; I.• L.:,'‘ore to tit
4'84.--A/78 '32 '29 -w.
M A NoR
f'h:::,-,7:-.374so Dote ,
Or Cy: 7 ox
943;
ROAD
•,..) • n/0 17 P
-1 't
SATHRE-SERCOUIST, INC.
IOS SOUTH 'ROADWAY • WAYZATA. MN ISM
TELEPHONE 1104111400o
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
for .
THE ROTTLUND COMPANY, INC. 1
o Denotes Iron Monument
X000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation
1000.01 Denotes Proposed Elevation
.4t— Denotes Direction of Surface Drainage
Proposed Top of Foundation Elevation = 944 , 7
Proposed Garage Floor Elevation = 944
Proposed Lowest Floor Elevation = 936.o
I hereby certify that this is o true and correct representation of a survey of the boUndaries of:
Lot 1 14, Block 5, TIMBER CREEK WOODS 2nd ADDITION . .
I . . -! - Ilnnepin County, Minnesota 0 i., V [
BLDG. CN1..• l
And of flt . -location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from
or on said larldelAsluri yeyed.by me this iith d Y of June 1987 .,
4.
•
'CITY C .fti) EN I,: ././f•rr:
." • ju;,: ) iThoinas S. Bergqul st
Registered Land Surveyor, Minn. Lie. No. 7725
I f LI!
Z I17
tiMI
uZic.
d \.
1S.J.1,1d ' irx r vu 1'41 rAct .ct z-t g ••, •
•1 III
-
01111.-; I 11,
411 4..74b•Z
• '',44fo gssr
ET
97i911
BIND
:-; e I
:I
r ,1
nir
2"x10"
Ijoists in this section
will be spliced (over-
lapped) over center bed,
20 ft.
2410" 3 ft ' 3 ft.
stairwa ,
0
I Vr8" cantilever.
triple 2"x10" beam
triple 2"x10"
14 ft.
t triple 2"x10"
Note: 14'x20' section may be converted to a
three season porch in the future
(roof to be gable type)
Entire deck to have 2"x6" decki
RI 1 joists to be 2"x10"-12"0.C. • - footings 16"x16"x8"
42" deep
O - footings 8" dia. x 12" fla
42" deep
3 II
36"
7 ft.
fill posts
6"x6"
7 ft.
0100
18 f t.
VARIANCE #89-36
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS
FINAL ORDER
RE: Petition of Bradley P. Kuyper
ADDRESS: 16534 South Manor Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 14, Block 5, Timber Creek Woods 2nd Addition
VARIANCE REQUEST: The request is for a variance from City Code, Chapter Section
11702, Subdivision 2, I L to permit a deck addition 11' from the
rear lot line. City Code requires 70 O.
The Board of Appeals and Adjustments for the City of Eden Prairie at a regular meeting
thereof duly considered the above petition and after hearing and examining all of the
evidence presented and the file therein does hereby find and order as follows:
1. All procedural requirements necessary for the review of said variance have
been met. (YES X NO )
2. There are circumstances unique to the property under consideration, and
granting such variances does not violate the spirit and intent of the
City's Zoning and Platting Code.
3. Variance Request #89-36 is herein Granted X , Denied
4. Conditions to the granting X , denial , of said variance are as
follows:
A 17' rear yard setback must be maintained.
5. This variance shall be revoked within 15 days after notice of failure to
meet the required conditions has been given.
6. A copy of this order shall be forwarded to the applicant by the City
Clerk.
7. This order shall be effective July 13, 1989; however, this variance shall
lapse and be of no effect unless the erection or alternatives permitted
shall occur within one (1) year of the effective date unless said period
of time is extended pursuant to the appropriate procedures prior to the
expiration of one year from the effective date hereof.
8. All Board of Adjustments and Appeals actions are subject to City Council
review.
BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS
BY:
DATED: July 13, 1989
Page 15
K. Variance request #89-36 to review and consider the variance request #89-36,
submitted by Bradley P. Kuyper for property located at 16534 South Manor Road Eden EiEETE:- Minnesota. The request is for a variance from Ciity Code, Chapter -II;
Section 11.02, SubdivisTYF 2, p, to permit a deck addinTin I' from the rear it
line. City Code requires 20'.
Background - The property under variance request consideration is located in the
Timber Creek Woods 2nd Addition. The addition was platted and zoned R1-9.5 in 1983.
A home was constructed on the lot in 1987. The rear of the home is located 31' from
the rear lot line.
Variance Request - The applicant is proposing to construct a deck which at its
closest point, will be located 11' from the rear lot line. City Code requires 20'.
(Note Exhibit F ).
Alternative - One alternative is to construct a deck which would meet code. A deck
of 11' in depth could be constructed. (Note Exhibit G).
Should the Board identify a hardship, but is uncomfortable with a 11' rear yard
setback, alternatives to lessen the variance request may be appropriate.
Conclusion - A deck could be constructed on the property which will meet code and
not restrict use of the property. Should the Board approve the variance requested,
specific findings need to be identified uniquely qualifying such an action.
The Board may choose one of the following options:
1) Approve variance request #89-36 as submitted, identifying unique
circumstances supporting the approval.
2) Approve variance request #89-36 with amendments identifying unique
circumstances supporting the approval.
3) Deny variance request #89-36 finding a deck may be built and meet code.
An 11' deck is not restrictive. No specific hardship has been
substantiated.
car/ of 5M -FF
:G(00R7 -- PA -Tel)
7 - 7 -
.141•7-3(0
0C 2
4r
t .ek•-•\
-98.7'7- -N89°02: E -
NOTIC1
shr.11 fv.Idv,rify o ,
r.! crwr, ond
1.11Jer
EN.Ismn .r 3nAility lot problrnIu
93371 %
j .• L:4!ute tO
I •
•40
u,
,..• v..atcx ;lift, It
in, J l'ivrn .e- /7- L..)
I Phi 4-57-117 Dotc. A
I OK Ey: . Ofn
943.3
943.%
MANOR
ROAD
SATHPE-BEIRGOUIST,INC.I
IEM SOUTH USOADWAYS WAYZATA, MN 51351
tttttt ONE 1111.1711 8000 I Imo - 128
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
Exhibit F
1:30
I „, ,
Existin g
House.
o Denotes Iron Monument
X000.0 Denotes Existin g Elevation
1000.01 Denotes Proposed Elevation
Denotes Direction of Surface Draina g e
Proposed Top of Foundation Elevation = 944.7
Proposed Gara g e Floor Elevation = 944. ,
Proposed Lowest Floor Elevation
I hereb y certif y that this is a true and correct representation of a surve y of the boundaries of:
Lot 14, Block 5, TIMBER CREEK WOODS 2nd ADDITION
i1 n ', nnepin County, Minnesota L. ‘1-9 II. ti
BLDG. c.: :1
And of location of all buildin g s, if any , thereon, and all visible encroachments, if gn y , from
or on soid lancyrAs luri ve yed .b y m e this 11th day of June„ 1987
1 n •.: I!. (.0 1 .- • t*. . i7;)
((1Y
ED! i: N;./.tr Ir • .p ret: 1 g ;Thomas S. Berggulst
Re g istered Land Surve y or, Minn. Lie. No. 7725
n....!
,Ros3
„Ir,1:144<.; 11,11 forld vtrify
:mit, GI Itrwet owl Wier St 'vices
lc ir Euildef
AS y IC, ptobl e
f fa d:
4S3:1
*yak.: id
d ft c;rn .e-
1'11:32:-67s o Dot e47
1 OK ty:
!,e943.3
Existing
House.
•••nn
•.•
I
SA THRE.BERGOUIST, INC.
100 SOUTH SAOADWAY • WAYZATA, MN $53111
TELSPHON I $1141145000
/ 4 5 1'T •••.4,7 ,qp
NOTICE •
1000.01 Denotes Proposed Elevation
X000.0 Denotes Existin g Elevation
-a Denotes Direction of Surface Drainage Proposed Lowest Floor Elevation —
o Denotes Iron Monument
1 hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of:
NoR
Proposed Top of Foundation Elevation m.
Proposed Garage Floor Elevation 944. Z
ROAD
„ :13.6
P36.0
. Lot 14, Block 5, TIMBER CREEK WOODS 2nd ADDITION
Li
I dilnnepin County, Minnesota
r
• .
And of tee .iociorlur uii 'bulicrngs, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if or on soid lartdzIt.As lurveyed by me this llthd Y ofJune 1987 .
•'.CITY Cr) .1" r".
• j—) " ,1
FrIr [;/ r r...:r.r:• • " • Ju•„:-c Thomas S. Bergoulst
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
Exhibit G
ny, from
tic
14 eqq if (0 IAJti T&15
7'7 -6;1
0 Nii-pplzakr,
Travelle said they would forgo the sign at Pioneer Trail and Mitchell Rd.
(the 24 sign). They have studied this very carefully and it is not a whim.
Bozonie said he liked the sign, but it could be 3/4 of the height and
3/4 of the width.
Harvey asked if there were two area identification signs allowed on the
1st platt or the entire 150 acres.
Travelle said there would be no more significant signage. The collector
street is Mitchell Rd. No road systems have been developed as yet or
lot configurations laid out. This sign would be the master signage for
Boulder Point.
Anderson noted the following from the Staff report:
Lonaltions:
No additional Boulder Pointe signs within the 150 acre PUB be permitted
except for a 24 square foot sign at the Pioneer Trail entrance to Boulder
Pointe
Travelle said more signage may be needed at the Twin Home section of the
development.
Bozonie felt that the liked the sign, but not the size.
Akemann said he was in favor of the sign, but saw no hardship. He liked the
idea of a trade off, but not for just one sign. Possibly there should be
an ordinance change.
Harvey said he had a problem with large signs unless something is given in
return--and one sign is not enough. He asked Travelle if he could live
with one other sign at the Twin Home section besides the one being proposed.
Travelle answered yes.
Akemann said he was undecided--according to the code there was no hardship.
MOTION: Anderson moved that the Board approve variance request
89-35 under the conditions that there be no additional
signage within the Boulder Point addition be permitted
except one additional sign up to 24 sq. ft. (area identification
sign) to be located at the developers discretion. Freemyer
seconded the motion and it passed 3-2 with Bozonie and Akemann
voting nay on the grounds that no hardship was demonstrated.
S Anderson added that the City should look into a modification of the PUD
rules so issues like this do not come before the Board. This should be a
part of the PUD.
Request #89-36, submitted la Bradley P. Kuyper for property located at 16534 SouthManor Road, Eden —Frairie, —RInnesota, TiWirTi EscrT5ir aiT—Tot --rT— Block !TTimber Creek Woods 2nd Addition. The r eque st is for a variance from City CoaTehapter —1:1„--TeTfig 117,02, Subdivision 2— deck addition 11' from tfiFFIFF lot line. City Code requiFes.20'.
doSS
L.
15
Bradley Kuyper appeared to present the variance. He stated th
a
t
t
h
e
lot was unique as it is perfectly square--the rest are rectan
g
u
l
a
r
.
As such, it allows only 11' in which to build a deck. Part of
t
h
e
proposed deck will be turned into a porch in the future.
Harvey said he felt the size of the request could be reduce
d
.
Akenann said he was not in favor of passing anytning this l
a
r
g
e
-
-
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
y
a continuance should be granted.
Kuyper asked how the Board felt about 16'. Then he asked a
b
o
u
t
1
4
'
b
y
1
4
'
.
NOTION: Anderson moved that the Board approve variance requ
e
s
t
8
9
-
3
6
with modifications:
That there be a maximum of 17' setback from the rear lot lin
e
,
or a total variance of 3' into the rear yard set back area.
Grounds for this motion were the unique nature of the lot,
the structure creates no negative impact, the lot is square,
and the constraints placed on the ability to construct a
deck. Harvey seconded the motion and it passed 4-1 with
Akemann opposed.
Request #89-37, submitted by James and Pauline Borucki for property located at 6517 Rowland IteEael- 17:117Te -Thlnesota, legafl y described as Lot 5 —8-7-c-172 Carmel Addition. The request is for a variance from City Code, Chapter 11, Section 17152, Subdivision 2, ill to permit proposed parcel B of 12,7.17-i7fiare feet. City Code requires 11,59 square feet in the1T:17.5 'pining District. (2) to permit thrsting structure 1770' from the front lot line. City Code requires a 30' front yard setback. 3 to permit proposed tract B with an average lot -WdT1--iof . City Code requires 88'.
James & Pauline Boucki appeared to present the variance request. He explained that the variance request as follows: 1. To divide lot 5 into 2 parcels, (A & B), with lot 5 maintaining the existing home.
The number of driveways would remain the same. The density
o
f
h
o
m
e
s
along Roland Rd would have only a 1% increase. He asked the
B
o
a
r
d
t
o
consider the following: The setback from the road. The squa
r
e
f
o
o
t
a
g
e
-
-
he would need to purchase land and the NE side is part of Ca
r
m
e
l
D
r
i
v
e
(this would be impossible) and the east side is much too st
e
e
p
.
I
f
a
new home were to be built on the lot, it could not be broug
h
t
t
o
t
h
e
lot line to create a crowded situation. It would not create a
p
r
e
c
e
d
e
n
t
in the area, because it is a unique situation (being a tria
n
g
u
l
a
r
l
o
t
)
.
The variance would be for lot B only--lot A is to code.
Johnson explained that this proposal is before the Board prior to t
h
e
Planning Commission review. A driveway to a possible new ho
m
e
n
e
a
r
b
y
would have poor site lines unless it was placed on the corner of the property.
Harvey asked when the Borucki's had acquired the property and why they
were seeking to subdivide it. (2 0 S
FINAL REPORT
OF THE
LAWFUL GAMBLING STUDY COMMITTEE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
AUGUST 1989
Executive Summary:
In April 1989, the Eden Prairie City Counci
l
a
p
p
o
i
n
t
e
d
t
h
e
L
a
w
f
u
l
G
a
m
b
l
i
n
g
Study Committee to explore whether and to w
h
a
t
e
x
t
e
n
t
l
a
w
f
u
l
g
a
m
b
l
i
n
g
activities should be allowed within Eden Pr
a
i
r
i
e
.
S
i
n
c
e
t
h
e
i
r
f
i
r
s
t
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
o
n
May 4, 1989, Committee members have exami
n
e
d
a
v
a
r
i
e
t
y
o
f
i
s
s
u
e
s
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
with lawful gambling activities. Informat
i
o
n
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
f
r
o
m
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
resource persons, residents at a public me
e
t
i
n
g
,
s
t
a
f
f
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
,
a
n
d
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
experience have contributed to the Committ
e
e
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
By a 4 - 2 majority, the Committee member
s
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
t
h
a
t
n
o
l
a
w
f
u
l
g
a
m
b
l
i
n
g
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
requiring a State License be allowed with
i
n
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
.
T
h
e
r
e
a
s
o
n
s
f
o
r
t
h
i
s
conclusion will be discussed more fully l
a
t
e
r
.
I
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
w
e
r
e
t
o
decide that some forms of lawful gambling
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
,
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
members have suggested guidelines under whi
c
h
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
.
Types of Lawful Gambling: The State of Min
n
e
s
o
t
a
a
l
l
o
w
s
f
i
v
e
l
a
w
f
u
l
g
a
m
b
l
i
n
g
activities. These activities include bingo
,
p
u
l
l
t
a
b
s
,
r
a
f
f
l
e
s
,
t
i
p
b
o
a
r
d
s
,
a
n
d
paddlewheels. Fraternal, religious, vete
r
a
n
s
,
o
r
n
o
n
-
p
r
o
f
i
t
o
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
which qualify for tax-exempt status under
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
5
0
1
(
c
)
(
3
)
o
f
t
h
e
U
.
S
.
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
Revenue Code are the only groups which ma
y
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
l
a
w
f
u
l
g
a
m
b
l
i
n
g
.
State statutes and administrative rules p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
s
y
s
t
e
m
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
g
a
m
e
s
are run fairly and gambling revenues are u
s
e
d
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
l
y
.
Lawful gambling is a big business in Minn
e
s
o
t
a
.
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
s
p
e
n
d
a
n
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
$1 billion on gambling per year. The acti
v
i
t
i
e
s
w
h
i
c
h
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
t
h
e
m
o
s
t
revenue are pulltabs and bingo.
Licenses Required: The State of Minnesota
h
a
s
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
t
h
r
e
e
t
y
p
e
s
o
f
11-Ein'ses which may be issued for one year t
o
c
h
a
r
i
t
a
b
l
e
o
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
C
l
a
s
s
A
licenses allow an organization to conduct a
l
l
f
i
v
e
l
a
w
f
u
l
g
a
m
b
l
i
n
g
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
.
Class B licenses allow each gambling activ
i
t
y
e
x
c
e
p
t
b
i
n
g
o
.
A
C
l
a
s
s
C
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
permits an organization to conduct only bi
n
g
o
.
A
v
a
r
i
e
t
y
o
f
e
x
e
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
e
x
i
s
t
for several types of one-time or infrequent
g
a
m
b
l
i
n
g
o
c
c
a
s
i
o
n
s
a
s
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
Chapter 349 of Minnesota Statutes. For t
h
e
s
e
e
x
e
m
p
t
e
d
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
,
organizations must receive a certificate fr
o
m
t
h
e
S
t
a
t
e
a
n
d
n
o
t
i
f
y
t
h
e
municipality at least 30 days before the
e
v
e
n
t
.
The State of Minnesota issues a license o
r
c
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
e
a
f
t
e
r
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
n
g
a
background investigation of the applicant
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
t
h
e
f
i
t
n
e
s
s
o
f
t
h
e
organization and the applicability of any
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
o
c
a
l
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
I
n
addition to meeting the test for being an
e
l
i
g
i
b
l
e
t
y
p
e
o
f
o
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
,
t
h
e
applicant must have been in existence at l
e
a
s
t
t
h
r
e
e
y
e
a
r
s
a
n
d
h
a
v
e
a
t
l
e
a
s
t
1
5
active members.
Z S ?
- 2 -
Local Regulation: According to M.S. 349.213, subd. 1, "a statutory.. .City...
has the authority to adopt more stringent regulation of any form of lawful
gambling.. .,including the prohibition of any form of lawful gambling, and may
require a permit for the conduct of gambling except from licensing." In a
recent opinion in response to questions from the City of Cloquet, the Minnesota
Attorney General emphasized that local regulations may apply only to the form
of gambling -- i.e., the types of games and how they are conducted -- and not
to the organizations which may conduct gambling activities. Further, a city
may only specify how up to ten percent of net profits must be spent; an
organization has discretion for use of the remaining ninety percent.
One further local power to limit gambling exists in this section of the
statute. An organization must notify a city when it makes an application for
a State license. Within 60 days, a city council may adopt a resolution to deny
the license application. Without disapproval during this time, the license
request is considered to have local approval.
Study Process: Committee members consulted a variety of resources in order to
make recommendations within the legal framework summarized above. Several
persons presented information and opinions to the Committee:
Chuck Anderson, Minnesota Department of Revenue, Charitable Gambling Division
Lt. Les Bridger, Eden Prairie Police Department
Bill Nelson, Wayzata Lions Club
Don Storm, Minnesota State Senator, District 42
Duaine Denman, Eden Prairie American Legion Post #409
At a public meeting held June 15, 1989, persons spoke on behalf of the
following groups:
Academy for Artistic Gymnastics Booster Club
Eden Prairie American Legion Post 409
Eden Prairie American Legion Post 409 Auxiliary
Eden Prairie Lions Club
Eden Prairie Ministerial Association
Speak Again - Tracheotomies and Laryngectomies
Private residents (two)
Committee members also shared several articles and legal opinions. From this
broad range of information presented verbally and on paper, Committee members
considered the benefits and drawbacks of lawful gambling activity.
Recommendation Not to Allow Lawful Gambling: A majority of Committee members
recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance which would not allow within
Eden Prairie the issuance of Class A, B, and C licenses as described in
Minnesota statutes. Lawful gambling activities which are allowed with
exemption certificates from the State should be allowed within the City.
The drawbacks to lawful gambling outweigh the benefits from the proceeds of
these activities. The issues involved are both practical and philosophical.
gos7
- 3 -
Fundraising: Lawful gambling is an effective fundraising activity. As
trends in government spending show a reduced scope of responsibility
f
o
r
s
o
c
i
a
l
services, charitable organizations have been identified as ones whic
h
c
a
n
f
i
l
l
a vacuum. They can use proceeds from a variety of sources to addres
s
existing and emerging community needs.
A substantial part of the gross revenues from gambling are returne
d
t
o
players as winnings. The remaining funds must go toward administr
a
t
i
v
e
expenses, taxes, and charitable giving. During the 1989 session o
f
t
h
e
Legislature, new laws were adopted for taxation of lawful gamblin
g
.
T
h
e
e
f
f
e
c
t
of these new laws is to reduce the amount of net proceeds for char
i
t
a
b
l
e
purposes to 4.5 to 5.0 percent of gross revenue. The effort requi
r
e
d
b
y
organizations to gain this revenue is tremendous compared to the p
r
o
f
i
t
t
h
e
y
receive.
Revenues from lawful gambling are variable over time. Organization
s
conducting lawful gambling and recipients of their charity may bec
o
m
e
dependent on gambling receipts for their on-going operations. Shor
t
f
a
l
l
s
w
i
l
l
cause problems. Experience in other states with such lawful gambli
n
g
opportunities as pulltabs, lotteries, and pari-mutuel betting sugg
e
s
t
s
t
h
a
t
gambling is an entertainment fad. After a few years revenues begin
t
o
d
r
o
p
as the novelty for gambling wears off. With the coming of a lotter
y
i
n
Minnesota, an activity with larger prizes than the other forms of l
a
w
f
u
l
gambling allowed by Statute, it is possible that the money resident
s
m
a
y
s
p
e
n
d
in lawful gambling could decrease further.
Traditional fundraising efforts, those which reward commitments of
t
i
m
e
a
n
d
energy, result in greater overall public service. Gambling as a fun
d
r
a
i
s
i
n
g
activity appeals more to people who enjoy gambling than to those pe
r
s
o
n
s
w
h
o
wish to give for particular causes. It is a convenient way to raise
f
u
n
d
s
,
b
u
t
the motives among the participants are not necessarily charitable.
Patronage Questions: It is a common perception that persons who participate in
lawful gambling activities are ones with low to moderate amounts of
discretionary income. Eden Prairie residents, most of whom are in t
h
e
m
i
d
d
l
e
to upper end of the socio-economic scale, are not in a group likely
t
o
patronize these gambling operations. Many of the players of these g
a
m
e
s
w
o
u
l
d
not be residents of Eden Prairie, but rather people who come into Ed
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
for entertainment and recreation. The number of players, and consequ
e
n
t
l
y
the amount of revenue, from gambling activity is likely to be less t
h
a
n
proponents have estimated.
How Fairly are the Games Operated?: According to a representative of the
Minnesota Department of Revenue, a number of practices exist which
g
o
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
the legal operations of gambling as described in statutes and admi
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
rules. Pulltab sellers may alert friends that a sizable pot remai
n
s
w
i
t
h
j
u
s
t
a few pulltabs remaining. Sellers may not record the serial numbe
r
s
o
f
e
a
c
h
pulltab game played, thus underreporting the amounts to be taxed a
n
d
t
o
b
e
contributed to charities. These are examples of cheating the play
e
r
s
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
their chances for a fair shot at the winnings is compromised. Add
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
y
,
persons who play these games with the belief that their losses wil
l
g
o
t
o
charities may see their gifts go to less than reputable operators.
Evidence of illegal operations is mounting. The Minnesota Legisla
t
u
r
e
h
a
s
not demonstrated its commitment to provide adequate staff and fina
n
c
i
a
l
resources for proper policing and regulation of lawful gambling.
B
y
a
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
lawful gambling in Eden Prairie, the City would be providing more
opportunities for improper operations and fraudulent use of revenue
s
.
ciA
- 4 -
Any Organization Can Do It: The recent Minnesota Attorney General's op
i
n
i
o
n
states that cities cannot specify the types of organizations which can
operate lawful gambling. The City Council may not, for example, restr
i
c
t
licenses only to those organizations based within Eden Prairie, nor ma
y
i
t
specify how to use more than ten percent of the net proceeds. A poten
t
i
a
l
exists for most of the profits to be used outside of the City.
It has been suggested that if Eden Prairie were not to allow these
activities, its island-like status would result in having these additi
o
n
a
l
charitable proceeds being given in some other community. While this
argument has merit, it is not necessarily true. As Minnetonka and Edi
n
a
do not allow lawful gambling, Eden Prairie would be part of a larger,
contiguous island. Nothing exists in statutes or administatives rule
s
t
o
assure that any more than ten percent of net proceeds would remain
within the City, and Committee members have pointed out that the amou
n
t
a
n
d
reliability of proceeds is questionable. Charitable contributions ar
e
already made to the Eden Prairie community by a number of dedicated c
i
v
i
c
organizations. The absence of lawful gambling does not mean that civ
i
c
g
i
v
i
n
g
would cease.
Costs: In addition to the drawbacks mentioned thus far, lawful gambl
i
n
g
entails a variety of other costs. Some are tangible and incurred now
;
o
t
h
e
r
s
,
less tangible and paid in the future. Monitoring gambling activities w
i
l
l
require dedication of staff time from the Police Department. Revenues
f
r
o
m
the City tax allowed by statute probably would not cover the City's cos
t
s
f
o
r
administration and enforcement. Establishments with gambling activitie
s
,
and particularly bingo halls, can produce sizable amounts of traffic to
t
h
e
community's already congested road system. Social costs may be difficu
l
t
t
o
measure, but they are real. Less money for family needs can result in
a
b
r
o
a
d
range of problems requiring immediate family intervention. Gambling ca
n
b
e
an addictive activity which affects the family, employers, and society
a
t
large. Not only are there disruptions at home and the workplace which
s
p
i
l
l
over and affect more persons than the gambler alone, but costs are bor
n
e
b
y
the public for treatment of this condiLion. While disallowing gamblin
g
i
n
Eden Prairie will not remove other opportunities to gamble, in a small
w
a
y
t
h
e
City could reduce the costs resulting from gambling.
Other Remarks: The Committee's recommendation not to allow lawful ga
m
b
l
i
n
g
iriTounded in practical and philosophical considerations. To allow l
a
w
f
u
l
gambling would be for the City Council to endorse a value of opportuni
s
m
and luck for the rest of the community. To do so would invite the
undesirable aspects of gambling into the hospitality and entertainment
establishments patronized by Eden Prairie residents. In making this
recommendation, the Committee is not making any value judgment about t
h
e
respect the community holds for any organization, nor is it casting
any doubt about an organization's competence to conduct lawful gambli
n
g
operations. Simply, a majority of the Committee does not favor conti
n
u
o
u
s
lawful gambling activities.
Guidelines if Lawful Gambling is Permitted: The Eden Prairie City C
o
u
n
c
i
l
h
a
s
already approved a number of CTiss A and Class C licenses for activi
t
i
e
s
a
t
t
h
e
Eden Prairie American Legion Post No. 409. Inasmuch as lawful gambl
i
n
g
e
x
i
s
t
e
d
prior to the Committee's deliberations and it appears likely that th
i
s
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
activity would be accepted by the community in the future, the Commi
t
t
e
e
h
a
s
developed guidelines when considering new license applications and
renewals.
,Z) 0
-5-
Several good reasons exist to allow lawful gamb
l
i
n
g
.
I
t
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
c
h
a
r
i
t
a
b
l
e
organizations with an opportunity to obtain more
m
o
n
e
y
t
o
g
i
v
e
t
o
a
v
a
r
i
e
t
y
o
f
worthwhile activities. These groups may provi
d
e
a
number of services which are no longer funded by government activities. For
a
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
p
e
o
p
l
e
,
l
a
w
f
u
l
gambling is a form of entertainment; indeed, a n
i
g
h
t
o
f
p
l
a
y
i
n
g
b
i
n
g
o
o
n
t
h
e
average costs as much as a night's entertainment
a
t
a
m
o
v
i
e
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
,
s
p
o
r
t
s
event, or restaurant. One could consider it w
o
r
t
h
w
h
i
l
e
t
o
h
a
v
e
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
which results in charitable contributions from
p
e
r
s
o
n
s
w
h
o
m
i
g
h
t
o
t
h
e
r
w
i
s
e
h
a
v
e
no inclination to make them.
A number of comments have been made that gover
n
m
e
n
t
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
i
n
t
e
r
f
e
r
e
a
s
little as possible with the morality and choices
o
f
t
h
e
i
r
c
i
t
i
z
e
n
s
;
l
i
m
i
t
i
n
g
lawful gambling is an inappropriate governmen
t
a
l
i
n
t
r
u
s
i
o
n
.
P
e
o
p
l
e
c
a
n
s
h
o
w
their sentiments against gambling by not parti
c
i
p
a
t
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
g
a
m
e
s
a
n
d
n
o
t
accepting gifts made possible by gambling prof
i
t
s
.
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
n
s
h
a
v
e
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
their desire to gamble by approving a constitu
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
a lottery. The Legislature has spoken for the
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
y
permitting lawful gambling subject to a compreh
e
n
s
i
v
e
s
e
t
o
f
s
t
a
t
u
t
o
r
y
and administrative controls. Residents should have
a
w
i
d
e
r
a
n
g
e
o
f
c
h
o
i
c
e
s
i
n
their activities and how they wish to raise fun
d
s
.
The following are the proposed guidelines:
1. Use of proceeds: The City shall specify that at
l
e
a
s
t
t
e
n
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
of net proceeds be used for human services needs
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
of Eden Prairie. These proceeds should be direc
t
e
d
t
o
P
R
O
P
u
n
l
e
s
s
PROP is unwilling or unable to use these funds.
I
n
t
h
e
e
v
e
n
t
t
h
a
t
PROP does not receive the funds, the City Counci
l
s
h
o
u
l
d
h
a
v
e
t
h
e
use of these funds overseen by the Eden Prairie
H
u
m
a
n
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Coordinating Council. The City Council should s
t
a
t
e
i
t
s
s
t
r
o
n
g
preference that any proceeds from gambling act
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
b
e
u
s
e
d
t
o
address human services needs (and not for such
t
h
i
n
g
s
a
s
p
a
r
k
acquisition or public safety equipment).
2. Organizations: Lawful gambling licensees must
b
e
l
e
g
a
l
l
y
c
h
a
r
t
e
r
e
d
non-profit organizations certified by the Stat
e
o
f
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
,
h
a
v
i
n
g
written constitutions stating the purposes for
t
h
e
i
r
e
x
i
s
t
e
n
c
e
,
having been in existence in Eden Prairie for a
t
l
e
a
s
t
t
h
r
e
e
y
e
a
r
s
with at least 15 members who hold their regula
r
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
within the City. (Realizing that this guidelin
e
m
a
y
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
recent Attorney General's opinion referenced e
a
r
l
i
e
r
,
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
u
r
g
e
s
the City Attorney to review the law and encour
a
g
e
s
t
h
a
t
a
w
a
y
b
e
f
o
u
n
d
to implement this recommendation.)
3. Records: Licensees approved by the City must m
a
k
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
t
o
the City all records the organization must sen
d
t
o
t
h
e
S
t
a
t
e
.
T
h
e
City would have all rights to review records wi
t
h
o
u
t
p
r
i
o
r
n
o
t
i
c
e
or search warrants. Further, organizations wou
l
d
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
send to the City on a monthly basis copies of b
a
n
k
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
cancelled checks, as well as to provide records
o
f
a
l
l
u
n
i
t
s
o
f
gambling purchased, sold, and remaining. These
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
o
u
l
d
provide the City with another level of investig
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
that gambling operations were being conducted p
r
o
p
e
r
l
y
.
.206
-6-
4. City Tax: A City tax of 1.0 percent of gross receipts should be
levied on activities conducted under a Class A, B, or C license.
While State Statute allows a 3.0 percent City levy, it should be
noted that the State now receives a 6.0 percent tax on gross receipts.
A 9.0 percent tax by State and City would reduce the amount of
proceeds available to charitable gambling so significantly that
organizations would be discouraged to conduct lawful gambling. It
is more important to have proceeds going to charitable uses than
the City's general fund.
5. Locations: Committee members strongly believe that the number of
locations where gambling would be allowed should be very limited. A
reasonable standard to consider is one location per 10,000 residents.
Because Eden Prairie's population is so close to 40,000, four locations
could be permitted at this time. Additional criteria related to eligible
locations include:
a) In locations which have restaurant service, gambling
activities must not be permitted in the dining, lobby, or
cashier areas of the establishment. In on-sale liquor
establishments, activities would be allowed only in the
bar area. Gambling activities should not be allowed in what
could be characterized as "family places", or areas of
establishments where families would be present.
b) An organization receiving a lawful gambling license should
be allowed to conduct gambling activities at only one
location within Eden Prairie.
c) Only one license should be permitted to operate at a location.
Locations at which multiple-licensees were permitted to
operate prior to August 15, 1989 should be exempt from this
limitation.
When developing an ordinance to regulate lawful gambling, the ordinance
adopted by the City of Minneapolis should be used as a model for
technical provisions relating to permitted locations.
6. Bingo Hall Operations: All bingo halls should be allowed to conduct
bingo activities no more than four days during the week. Committee
members do not believe that the community wished to be associated
with a seven-days-per-week bingo hall. Because most of the players
probably would not reside in Eden Prairie, those persons arriving in cars
and buses at the bingo hall would add significantly to traffic volumes
on an already strained local and regional roadway system. If a bingo
hall is successful, the traffic activity it generates could be
incompatible with residential or neighboring land uses.
7. No Paddlewheel Games: Paddlewheel games (similar to a "Wheel of
Fiirtune" wheel) are not often played in Minnesota. They are also
games in which a relatively high level of cheating is done by game
operators. Consequently, no paddlewheel games should be allowed
under Class A and Class B licenses.
206A
-'7-
Committee members thank the City Council for
t
h
i
s
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
t
o
s
e
r
v
e
t
h
e
community. We have worked diligently with ma
n
y
h
o
u
r
s
o
f
s
p
i
r
i
t
e
d
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
.
We were not unanimous with many of our recomm
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
T
h
e
y
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
majority or consensus viewpoints. Because Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
wide set of perspectives, we have been able t
o
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
w
o
r
k
a
b
l
e
a
n
d
satisfactory methods to regulate lawful gamblin
g
i
n
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
.
Committee Members:
Pat Breitenstein Paul Redpath
Dan Dryer Merrill Ronning
Jeff Olson Judy Schuck
Jerry Johnson, Chair
Staff: Craig W. Dawson, Assistant to the City Manage
r
2063
MARCUS
seitAkt tuti 5,1
Real Estate Development
CORPORATION
August 11, 1989
City of Eden Prairie
Attn: Steve Durham
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Mayor Peterson and Members of the City Council:
We would like to request that the Mayor and Council plea
s
e
review the Board of Adjustments decision regarding lot s
i
z
e
variances requested for 7808 Eden Prairie Road, the prop
e
r
t
y
for which we are representing Carolyn "Connie" Anderson.
T
h
e
variance request number is 89-42.
The Board denied our request determining that a hardship
d
i
d
not exist and that the Board did not want to create a
precedent (they as a Board, separate from the City Counci
l
)
they had not yet created. We respectfully submit that we
have shown hardship as defined at the City Council meetin
g
considering the Guide Plan, Zoning and Plat items.
Sincerely,
Mark O. Senn
MOS/bjm
10001 Wayzata Blvd. • Suite 100 • Minnetonka MN 55343 • (612) 593-1177
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 89-182
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following
improvement:
I.C. 52-144 Bluff Road
bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids
received are shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and,
WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommended award of contract to:
Richard Knutson, Inc.
as the lowest responsible bidder,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as
follows:
The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter
into a contract with Richard Knutson, Inc. in the name of the City of
Eden Prairie in the amount of $361,441.07 in accordance with the plans
and specifications thereof approved by the Council and on file in the
office of the City Engineer.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 15, 1989.
Gary Peterson, Mayor
John D. Frane, Clerk
ATTEST
SEAL:
117 Hansen Thorp i I Pellinen Olson Inc. 71 a
I I Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors
August 11, 1989
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Attn: Alan Gray, P.E.
Re: I.C. 52-144 Bluff Road
Dear Mr. Gray:
Bids were received and opened at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday August 10, 1989,
for the above referenced project. The bids are shown on the attached
Summary of Bids.
The estimated construction cost in the feasibility report was
$450,850.00. The low bidder, Richard Knutson, Inc. came in well below
this estimate at $361,441.07. The feasibility study estimate was based
on average unit prices typical to past Eden Prairie projects. On this
project a significant shift from average prices occurred in the open
bidding market, particularily in the grading and storm sewer costs. The
majority of participating bidders have been successful low bidders on
recent Eden Prairie work, and/or have their equipment and manpower
readily available, and are evidently aggressively pursuing late summer
work. Coupling this with a somewhat reduced scope of work from the
feasibility report (elimination of a section of water main, sidewalk,
and certain utility services) has yielded a very favorable low bid.
Recommendation is made that the City Council award Improvement Contract
52-144 to Richard Knutson, Inc. in the amount of $361,441.07. This
recommendation considers the receipt of a favorable bid below the
feasibility report estimate and that the City Council reserves the right
to award the contract in the best interests of the City.
Respectfully,
HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC.
jabtiC C/141.2.071-n
Laurie A. Johnson, P.E.
LAJ/kjs
enclosure
(612) 829-0700 • 7565 Office Ridge Circle • Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3644
SUMMARY OF BIDS
I.C. 52-144
DESCRIPTION: Bluff Road
BIDS OPENED: August 10, 1989 10:00 A.M.
CONSULTING ENGINEER: Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson Inc.
CHECKED BY: Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson Inc.
BIDDER
Richard Knutson, Inc.
Nodland Construction
Landwehr Heavy Moving
S.M. Hentges
Northdale Construction
Brown & Cris
J.P. Norex
G.L. Contracting
BID SECURITY
Yes 5%
Yes 5%
Yes 5%
Yes 5%
Yes 5%
Yes 5%
Yes 5%
Yes 5%
TOTAL AMOUNT
$ 361,441.07
$ 376,346.50
$ 384 451.00
$ 389,112.30
$ 391,563.70
$ 393,288.20
$ 416,455.15
$ 468,948.20
The undersigned recommend award of Contract to:
Richard Knutson, Inc.
as the lowest responsible bidder for this Improvement Contract.
(JOlat ./ a.
Consulting ;ineer
Alan D. Gray, P.E.
City Engineer
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 89 -183
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following
improvements:
I.C. 52-171
Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, Watermain and Street Improvements
Country Glen (RCM Project No. 10043.01)
bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received are
shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends award of contract to
Nodland Construction Co., Inc.
as the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as
follows:
The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter
into a contract with Nodland Construction Co., Inc.
in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of $266,822.00
in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the
Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Gary Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL:
John D. Frane, Clerk
g
William B. Cook, P.E.
RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATES, INC.
August 14, 1989
Mr. Alan D. Gray, P.E.
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
RE: Country Glen Subdivision
I.C. 52-171
RCM Project No. 10043.01
Dear Mr. Gray:
Bids were opened on August 10, 1989 for the above referenced project.
The low bid for the project was submitted by Nodland Construction Co.,
Inc. in the amount of $266,822.00. This is approximately 6% below the
engineer's estimate of $285,000 based upon the final design. The
developer's cost estimate, based on their preliminary plat as listed in
their petition, was $201,318.
The final design of the sanitary sewer added some minor manhole and
sewer quantities to account for a $5,500 increase beyond the developer's
preliminary estimate.
The watermain portion of the project included four additional hydrants
and two additional valves more than the developer's estimate to account
for the $9,527 difference between the low bid and the developer's
preliminary estimate.
The street and storm sewer portion of the project was bid at $48,467
more than the developer's preliminary estimate. The final design
included $28,525 of subgrade replacement and materials required if
unsuitable subgrade materials are encountered during construction. The
sto:m sewer bid was $12,130 more than the developer's estimate due to
the addition of catch basins, three manholes and drain tile. Surface
restoration and miscellaneous items added $7,270 to the developer's
estimate.
A summary of the eleven bids received is attached. The number of bids
and the grouping of the lowest nine bids indicate that the bidding
process was competitive and that rebidding this work would not likely
result in lower bid prices. We theiefore recommend award to Nodland
Construction Co., Inc. in accordance with their submitted bid.
Sincerely,
WBC/jj
Enclosures
[IT
rieke
carroll
muller
associates, inc.
engineers
arthrlects
land surveyors
equal opporlundy
employer
10901 red curie drive
box 130
minnetonka. minnesota 55343
612-935-6901
COUNTRY GLEN
EDEN PRAIRIE I.C. NO. 52-171
RCM PROJECT NO. 10043.01
BID OPENING: August 10, 1989 10:00 A.M.
BIDDER BID SECURITY TOTAL BID
Nodland Construction 5% $266.822.00
Northdale Construction 5% $272.071.70
Annandale Contracting 5%
5%
$285,655.65
$294,257.70 Barbarossa and Sons
Brown & Cris 5% $294,339.10
Richard Knutson, Inc. 5% $296,189.11
F.F. Jedlicki 5% $297,194.50
S.M. Hentges & Sons 5% $304,745.00
J.P. Norex 5% $306,695.75
B & D Underground 5% $316,489.00
G.L. Contracting 5% $368,964.80
LOAN O.
MAN AGREE24ENT
BETWEEN THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND
THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FOR HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of , 1989, by and between the Metropolitan Council, heigiTafter referred to as the Council, and
the City of Eden Prairie, hereinafter referred to as the "Recipient."
WHEREAS, the Council has been authorized by Minnesota Statutes section 473.167,
subdivision 2a, to make hardship loans to acquiring authorities in the
Metropolitan Area for the purpose of acquisition of homestead property within a
proposed state trunk highway right-of-way or project and to provide relocation
assistance, and to use the Metropolitan Right-of-Way Acquisition Loan Fund for
this purpose; and
WHEREAS, the Recipient, an eligible acquiring authority, has applied for such a
loan to accomplish the acquisition of homestead property from and to provide
moving costs to owners of homestead property burdened by circumstances that
constitute a hardship because of their inability to sell the property within
the proposed right-of-way of Trunk Highway 212; and
WHEREAS, the Council has authorized that such a loan be made from the
Metropolitan Right-of-Way Acquisition Loan Fund.
NOW, THEREFCPE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein
and the Council's agreement to loan funds to Recipient hereunder, the Council
and the Recipient agree as follows:
1. Loan Funds
A. The Council shall loan to the Recipient, in accordance with the
schedule set forth below, a total loan amount not to exceed
$99,350.00. The total loan amount is reduced by a salvage value of
$0.00.
B. Loan funds shall be made available to the Recipient as follows:
(1) Upon execution of this loan agreement, $96,500.00 shall be paid
to the Recipient for acquisition of that parcel of real property,
including any buildings or structures, described in Exhibit A,
which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
(2) Upon receipt by the Council of satisfactory and complete
documentation respecting Recipient's actual appraisal and
title evaluation costs and moving costs paid to the owners of the
homestead property, such actual costs and payments shall be paid
to the Recipient, provided however, that the amount paid for such
costs shall not exceed $2,850.00.
2. Authorized Use of Loan Proceeds
The parties agree that loan proceeds may be used only for the following
purposes:
-2-
A. The costs of acquiring the parcel of land described in Exhibit A.
B. The costs incurred by the Recipient to appraise the property and to
conduct a title evaluation.
C. Moving costs incurred by the owners of the homestead property
reimbursed by the Recipient.
3. Accounting
A. Separate Account. The Recipient agrees to establish and maintain
separate, accurate, and complete records and accounts relating to the
receipt and expenditure of any and all loan funds. Such accounts and
records shall be kept and maintained for a period of at least three
(3) years following discharge cf the loan.
B. Audit. The above accounts and records of the Recipient shall be
audited in the same manner as all other accounts and records of the
Recipient are audited, and may be audited and/or inspected on
Recipient's premises or otherwise by individuals or organizations
designated and authorized by the Council at any time following
reasonable notification during the loan period and for a period of
three (3) years following final loan discharge.
4. Reports
A. Acquisition Report. The Recipient agrees that upon completion of
the acquisition, the Recipient will submit to the Council an
acquisition report, in a format to be determined by the Council,
summarizing the acquisition costs of the property, including all
eligible Expenses and moving costs.
B. Annual Report. The Recipient agrees to submit, on or before June 30
of each year during which this agreement is in effect, an annual
report on the status of the loan, in a form to be determined by the
Council.
5. Income
The Recipient agrees to transfer to the Council, within 30 days of receipt,
all net rents or other money received as a result of Recipient's ownership
of the property.
"Net rents" shall be defined as the total gross rent received from any and
all tenants or users of the property, less the actual costs for necessary
maintenance, repairs, taxes, insurance, operating expenses, and attorneys'
fees associated with preparing or terminating any lease with respect to the
property. It is agreed that in no event shall such costs exceed 15% of
gross rent. For any given payment to the Council, the Recipient may
estimate the actual costs to be deducted from gross rent, provided that
such estimate shall not exceed 15% of the gross rent received. Twelve
months from the comencement of receipt of any rent by the Recipient from
any property acquired with loan proceeds, the Recipient shall provide, in a
form acceptable to the Council, documentation for all actual costs for
necessary maintenance, repairs, taxes, insurance, operating expenses, and
-3-
attorneys' fees with respect to the property. Upon verification and
acceptance of the documentation by the Council, the Recipient shall pay to
the Council the amount, if any, determined by the Council to be necessary
to adjust the estimated deduction from gross rent to reflect the actual
costs.
6. General Conditions
A. Duration. The loan award specified herein shall commence on the
execution of this agreement and remain in force and effect until the
loan is discharged.
B. Discharge. The Recipient agrees to pay to the Council, within 30 days
of receipt, the amounts received by the Recipient upon the occurrence
of any of the following event(s):
(1) If the property purchased with the loan funds made available
herein is conveyed to a highway authority for construction of a
highway, the Recipient shall repay to the Council the amount
received from the highway authority for the property. The amount
to be repaid shall include the amount actually disbursed pursuant
to article 1, paragraph B, subparagraph (2) attributable to the
property.
(2) If the Council notifies the Recipient that the plan to construct
the highway has been abandoned or the anticipated location of the
highway has changed, the Recipient shall repay the fair market
value of the property as determined by sale of the property in
accordance with procedures required for the disposition of
property. No such sale shall be valid without the prior approval
of the Council.
(3) If the property for any other reason is sold, or if the Recipient
materially breaches any term of this agreement, the Recipient
shall repay the amount specified in article 1, paragraph B,
subparagraph (1) and the amount actually disbursed pursuant to
article 1, paragraph B, subparagraph (2). The Council agrees to
notify the Recipient of any such breach and to provide a
reasonable opportunity to cure.
The Council agrees that upon payment of the specified amount it will
discharge the loan.
C. Interest. The loan made herein shall bear no interest.
D. Agreement and Restrictive Covenant. The Recipient and the Council
each agree that they will execute, and the Recipient agrees that it
will cause to be recorded at its own expense, an agreement and
restrictive covenant with reference to each parcel of land in which an
interest is acquired in whole or in part from grant proceeds. The
agreement and restrictive covenant shall be substantially in the form
contained in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof. It is the purpose of such agreement and restrictive covenant
to limit the right of the Recipient to convey or encumber land or
interests in land acquired with loan proceeds without the consent of
the Council, and to insure that such lands and interests therein be
devoted exclusively to the state highway purposes for which they were
acquired.
-4-
E. Agreement to Convey. The Recipient agrees that upon the request of
the authority authorized to construct the highway for which this right
of way has been reserved, the Recipient will convey the property to
the authority at the same price (including costs of appraisal and
title examination) which the Recipient paid for the property.
F. Rights Reserved. In the event that the Council finds that there has
been a failure to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the
Council reserves the right to take any and all actions as it deems
necessary or appropriate to protect the Council's interest, provided
that the Council agrees to notify the Recipient of any such failure to
comply and to provide a reasonable opportunity to comply.
G. Amendments. The terms of this agreement may be changed or modified by
mutual agreement of the parties hereto. Such changes or modifications
shall be effective only upon the execution of written amendments
signed by authorized representatives of the Council and Recipient.
H. Compliance with Certain Laws. The Recipient agrees to comply with all
applicable laws relating to nondiscrimination and affirmative action
in public purchasing, contracting, and employment.
In particular, the Recipient agrees not to discriminate against any
employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion,
sex, or national origin, and to take affirmative action that
applicants and employees are treated equally with respect to all areas
of employment, rates of pay and other forms of compensation, and
selection for training.
I. Property Maintenance. The Recipient agrees to make reasonable efforts
to maintain the property acquired with loan funds provided hereunder
in a manner compatible with the surrounding environment, as
appropriate.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed by their duly authorized representatives on the day and year first
above written.
Approved as to form MUMFOLITAN CCUNCIL
BY
Assistant Counsel David Renz, Executive bifector
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By
Mayor
By
City Manager
LM790A
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 5, Block 2, Eden School Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Including any buildings or structures thereon.
A-1
I., Plat Map I
lot
T-E
Wort:: 76714;nu
?•,t r. 78TH ST 7 1
Lt.23 ;:. (:,,
k •( A A IF dff
7
4 4.
NOS. A/ RI
)) I Sl
•0
A-2
EXHIBIT B
AGREEMENT AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
, 19 , by and between the City of party of
the first part, and the Metropolitan Council of the State of Minnesota, party
of the second part.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Party of the first part has acquired (describe here nature
of interest) in the real property, described on Exhibit A
attached hereto and incorporated herein; and
WHEREAS, Party of the second part has contributed funds toward the
acquisition of said interest in said real property pursuant
to its Loan Program and a Loan Agreement with party of the
first part as authorized by Minnesota Statutes S 473.167; and
WHEREAS, Said Loan Program was established pursuant to said law to
provide for the acquisition of homestead property within a
proposed state trunk highway right-of-way or project
from owners of such property who suffer a hardship because
of their inability to sell such property because of its
location.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the grant heretofore made by
second party to first party as aforesaid and in consideration of the mutual
agreements and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
NO sale, lease, mortgage or other coveyance, nor the creation of any
easement, restriction or other encumbrance against the above-described real
property shall be valid for any purpose unless the written approval of the
Metropolitan Council or its successors is duly filed and recorded at the time
of the filing and recording of the instrument to which such approval pertains,
nor shall said real property be used for any purpose except Trunk Highway 212
unless the Metropolitan Council or its successors shall consent to such other
use or uses by instrument in writing duly filed and recorded and designating
the nature, extent and duration of the use for which such consent is given.
This Agreement and Restrictive Covenant may be enforced by the
Metropolitan Council or its successors or by any citizen residing within the
metropolitan area as then defined by appropriate action in the courts of the
State of Minnesota.
B-1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to
be executed in their respective names all as of the date first above written.
Approved as to form METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
By
CITY OF
By Approved as to form
Mayor
By City Attorney
City Manager
I/4790A
B-2