HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 12/20/1988AGENDA
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia
Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant
to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson,
Finance Director John Frane, City Attorney
Roger Pauly, and Recording Secretary Deb
Edlund
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 20, 1988
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY MEMBERS:
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY STAFF:
I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
II. HRA RESOLUTION NO. 88-02 APPROVING REVISIONS TO THE TAX INCREMENT
PRANCING PLAN Fig ELIM SHORES (Continued from December 13, 1988)
III. ADJOURNMENT
Page 3095
AGENDA
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 20, 1988 IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING HRA MEETING
COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia
Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to
the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director
John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris
Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation &
Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director
of Public Works Gene Dietz, and Recording
Secretary Deb Edlund
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Final Plat Approval for Bell Oaks Second (located north of
Riverview Road in the north half of Section 36) Resolution No.
88-280
Page 3098
Page 3100
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,December 20, 1988
C. Partial Release of Special Assessment for Lot 2 2_2. Page 3103 Bluffs East 4th Addition (Resolution No. 88-301)
D. Final Plat Approval of Chestnut Place (located west of Anderson Page 3105 Lakes Parkway and north of Chestnut Drive) Resolution No. 88-300
E. Receive Petition and Order Feasibility Report for the Improvement Page 3107 of Riverview Road in Section 36 I.C. 52-151 (Resolution No. 88-
302)
F. Final Plat Approval for Burger King, Eden Prairie Addition TI-Te-s-Olution No. 8-3UTT
G. SUTLIFF PROPERTY. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 53-88, Zoning
District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 0.95 acres; and Adoption Page 3111
of Resolution No. 88-287, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 53-
88 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. Location: 7070 and
7080 Eden Prairie Road. (Ordinance No. 53-88, Rezoning; Resolution
No. 88-287, Authorizing Summary and Publication)
H. MIS SYSTEMS CORPORATION ADDITION by MIS Systems Corporation. 2nd Paae 3115
Reading of Ordinance No. 55-88, Zoning District Change from Rural -
to 1-5 on 36.8 acres; Approval of Addendum to Developer's Agreement
for MIS Systems Corporation Addition; and Adoption of Resolution
No. 88-288, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 55-88 and
Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 85,200 square foot addition
to the MIS building. Location: South of Highway #5, north of
Technology Drive, west of Purgatory Creek. (Ordinance No. 55-88,
Rezoning; Resolution No. 88-288, Authorizing Summary and
Publication)
I. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS by Wirtanen Clark Larsen Architects, Inc. 2nd
Reading of Ordinance No. 54-88, Zoning District Change from Rural
to Commercial Regional Service on 1.01 acres, with variances to be
reviewed by the Board of Appeals; Approval of Developer's Agreement
for Sherwin-Williams; and Adoption of Resolution No. 88-289,
Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 54-88, and Ordering
Publication of Said Summary. 1.01 acres for one lot for
construction of a retail paint store. Location: Along Plaza Drive
in front of Menard's Center. (Ordinance No. 54-88, Rezoning;
Resolution No. 88-289, Authorizing Summary and Publication)
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. ELIM SHORES. (Continued from 12/13/88) Resolution No. 88-294,
Approving Housing Plan for Elim Shores
B. ELIM SHORES. Tax Increment Financing Plan (Resolution No. 88-295) Page 3133
Continued from 12/13/88
C. OFFICIAL MAP T.H. 212 (Ordinance No. 63-88)
Page 3135A
D. STARVIEW TERRACE by Patrick Bauer. Request for Zoning District
Page 3136 Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 15.62 acres, Preliminary Plat of
15.62 acres into 30 single family lots, 2 outlots, and road right-
of-way for construction of a single family development. Location:
West side of Staring Lake, west of Mitchell Road. (Ordinance No.
60-88, Rezoning; Resolution No. 88-290, Preliminary Plat)
Page 3109
Page 3123
Page 3130
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,December 20, 1988
E. ARBY'S by Homart Development Company. Request for Zoning District Page
Change from Rural and Public to C-Reg-Ser on 3.4 acres, Preliminary
Plat of 3.4 acres into 2 lots for construction of a commercial
restaurant. Location: East of Franlo Road, north of Prairie
Center Drive, within the Eden Prairie Center property. (Ordinance
No. 61-88, Rezoning; Resolution No. 88-291, Preliminary Plat)
F. MARCUS DEVELOPMENT by Marcus Corporation. Request for Zoning Page 3155
District Change from Rural to C-Reg-Ser on 0.65 acres with
variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Preliminary Plat
of 1.61 acres into 2 lots and 1 outlot, for construction of a 3,300
square foot commercial building. Location: South of Prairie
Center Drive, east of Highway #169, west of Joiner Way. (Ordinance
No. 62-88, Rezoning; Resolution No. 88-292, Preliminary Plat)
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Page 3164
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. Findings Relating to City's Position on the Flying Cloud Airport Page 3165
Long Term Comprehensive Development Plan —Tiaster Plan) Interim
Report dated November, 1988 (Resolution No. 88-299)
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. High School Building Expansion Plans
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
IX. APPOINTMENTS
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
B. Report of City Manager
1. New Conditions for On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses
Mintinued from 11/15/88)
2. Request from City of Corcoran
C. Report of City Attorney
D. Report of Director of Planning
E. Director of Parks Recreation & Natural Resources
1. Recommendation on Revised Cash Park Fees (Continued from
12/13/88)
2. Proposed Park Bond Referendum Process
F. Report of Director of Public Works
1. Receive Southwest Area Study and Set Special City Council
Meeting for Tuesday, January 24, Igg9
G. Report of Finance Director
XI. NEW BUSINESS
Page 3181
Page 3186
Page 3188
XII. ADJOURNMENT
3144
Page 3167
Page 3176
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
December 20, 1988
1989 Licenses
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.)
Accent Communications, Inc.
M. G. Astleford Company, Inc.
Bor Son Building Corp.
Centex Homes Corporation
Feder Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Kohl enberger Construction Co.
Mikkelson-Wulff Construction, Inc.
Northwestern Mutual Life
Olympic Pools, Inc.
Opus Corporation
Rome Corporation
Trumpy Homes, Inc.
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY)
Bruce Bren Homes, Inc.
Gestach Paulson Construction
Harvey Homes, Inc.
Johnson-Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Knob Hill Homes, Inc.
Roger Kuechle Construction
Lecy Construction, Inc.
Dennis Lunski Construction, Inc.
Minnesota Pool & Spa, Inc.
Mowers Construction Company
The Pemtom Company
The Peter Andrea Company
Professional Carpenter
Rolyn Properties, Inc.
Wensmann Homes, Inc.
Wilson-Fisher Home Builders,Ltd.
Tom Zerull Construction
HEATING & VENTILATING
American Heating & Air Conditioning
Check Refrigeration, Inc.
ON SALE LIQUOR & SUNDAY LIQUOR
Abby's Restaurant
Ciatti's Restaurant
Edenvale Golf Course
Green Streets of Eden Prairie
Kabuki Restaurant
Mexican Village
Snax Bar & Grill
Stars Restaurant
ON SALE CLUB LIQUOR & SUNDAY LIQUOR
Olympic Hills Corporation
ON SALE WINE
Beijing Chinese Restaurant
Country Kitchen
Detello's Pizza & Pasta
PEDDLAR
Gerald Alois Brill (firewood)
Junior Careers (candy)
Patrick Ronald Meyer (firewood)
UTILITY INSTALLER
United Sewer & Water
3.2 BEER ON SALE
Lion's Tap
24-I/
A
at Solie
Licensing
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
page two
TYPE A FOOD
Lunds, Ihc.
Rainbow Foods
TYPE B FOOD
PDQ Food Store
TYPE C FOOD
Amaco Food Shop (Aztec Dr..)
Amaco Food Shop (Co. Rd. 62)
PUIQ Food Store
Superamerica (W. 78th St.)
3.2 BEER OFF SALE
Lion's Tap
Rainbow Foods
Superamerica (W. 78th St.)
PDQ Food Store
CIGARETTES
Amaco Foods Shop (Aztec Dr.)
Amaco Foods Shop (Co. Rd. 62)
Canteen Company of MN., Inc.
Lion's Tap
PDQ Food Store
Rainbow Foods
Superamerica (W. 78th St.)
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the
licensed activity.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-280
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
BELL OAKS SECOND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of BELL OAKS SECOND ADDITION has been submitted in a manner
required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under
Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had
thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for BELL OAKS SECOND ADDITION is approved upon
compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on
this plat dated December 13, 1988.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of
this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named
plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the
certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon
compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on December 20, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
?I OC)
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician . f
DATE: December 13, 1988
SUBJECT: BELL OAKS SECOND ADDITION
PROPOSAL: The Developer, Bell Oaks Company, have requested City Council
approval of the final plat of Bell Oaks Second Addition, a single family
residential subdivision located north of Riverview Road, south of
Purgatory Creek and east of County Road 18 in the north half of Section
36. This proposal is a replat of Outlot B Bell Oaks First Addition.
The plat contains 14.98 acres to be divided into 26 single family lots,
one Outlot and right-of-way dedication for street purposes. Outlot A
contains 0.35 acres, ownership of which shall be retained by the
Developer.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council January 19,
1988 per Resolution 88-16.
Second reading of Ordinance 8-88-PUD-1-88, changing zoning from Rural to
R1-13.5-PUD-1-88, was finally read and approved at the City Council
meeting held April 5, 1988.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed
April 5, 1988.
VARIANCES: All variance requests not approved with the Planned Unit
Development District Review and zoning district change must be processed
through the Board of Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities, roadways, and walkways will
be installed throughout the plat in conformance with City Standards and
the requirements of the Developer's Agreement. Prior to release of the
final plat, the plat shall be revised to include drainage and utility
easements over the 100-year flood elevation of the proposed pond within
Block 1.
PAGE 2 OF 2 BELL OAKS SECOND ADDITION
PARK DEDICATION: Prior to release of the final plat the Developer shall
provide the City with a written scenic easement over the Purgatory Creek
conservation area shown on the plat as a drainage and utility easement
within Lots I 81 2 Block 3. The remaining requirements for park
dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement.
BONDING: Bonding for municipal utilities and streets must be provided prior
to release of the final plat and conform to City Code and the
Developer's Agreement requirements.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Bell Oaks Second
Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's
Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $850.00.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $3,564.00.
3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $1,040.00.
4. Revision of plat to include drainage and utility easements over
ponding area on Block 1
5. Receipt of scenic easement documents over the Purgatory Creek
conservation area.
6. Revision of plat to include drainage and utility easements over all
of Outlot A.
JJ:ssa
cc: Bell Oaks Company
Ron Krueger & Associates
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 88-301
RELEASE FROM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie concurs with
the release of Lot 2, Block 2, Bluffs East Fourth Addition from that certain
Special Assessment Agreement dated the 28th day of December, 1984 between the
City of Eden Prairie and the Bluffs Company and hereby authorizes the Mayor
and City Manager to sign the Release of Special Assessment.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on December 20, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
(RES. 88-301)
PARTIAL RELEASE OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
- Abstract Property -
Know All Men By These Presents, that the City of Ede
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
,
a
m
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
corporation organized under the laws of the Stat
e
o
f
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
,
f
o
r
a
valuable consideration, receipt whereof is hereby ac
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
d
,
d
o
e
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
forever discharge and release the tract of land lying
a
n
d
b
e
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, described as follows:
LOT 2, BLOCK 2 BLUFFS EAST FOURTH ADDITION
From all claims and liens of and under that cer
t
a
i
n
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
Agreement dated the 28th day of December, 1984, b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
E
d
e
n
Prairie and the Bluffs Company and filed for reco
r
d
i
n
t
h
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
o
f
t
h
e
Register of Deeds in and for said County on the 1st
d
a
y
o
f
A
p
r
i
l
,
1
9
8
5
,
a
n
d
recorded in as Document Number 4979260.
THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By
Its
By
Its
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me th
i
s
day of , 19 , by and by
Prairie.
and of the City of Eden
Notary Public
This Instrument was Drafted By:
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-300
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
CHESTNUT PLACE
WHEREAS, the plat of CHESTNUT PLACE has been submitted in a manner required
for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462
of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder,
and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for CHESTNUT PLACE is approved upon
compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on
this plat dated DECEMBER 14, 1988.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of
this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named
plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the
certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon
compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on DECEMBER 20, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician
DATE: December 14, 1988
SUBJECT: CHESTNUT PLACE
PROPOSAL: The Developers, Chestnut Place Partners, have requested City
Council approval of the final plat of Chestnut Place. Located at the
northwest corner of Anderson Lakes Parkway and Chestnut Drive, the plat
contains 1.69 acres to be platted intc one lot for the construction of
an 8,320 square-foot neighborhood commercial center.
HISTORY: Second reading of Ordinance 44-88, changing zoning district from
RM-2.5 to Neighborhood Commercial was finally read and approved at the
City Council meeting held on November 1, 1988.
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council at their meeting
held September 20, 1988, per Resolution 88-211.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed
November 1, 1988.
VARIANCES: A variance for lot size was approved by the Board of Appeals.
All other variance requests must be processed through the Board of
Appeals.
PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the
Developer's Agreement and shall conform to City Code.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal streets and utilities necessary to
serve this site are in place.
A portion of the storm sewer for this project will be publicly owned and
maintained. This storm sewer will be constructed in conformance with
City Standards. Prior to release of the final plat the plat shall be
revised to include drainage and utility easements over the publicly
owned portion of the storm sewer.
BONDING: Bonding shall conform to City Code requirements.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Chestnut Place
subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement
and the following:
1. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $250.00.
2. Revision of plat to include drainage and utility easements over
publicly owned storm sewer.
JJ:ssa
cc: Chestnut Place Partners
Ron Krueger and Associates
Paul Strother, Cluts, O'Brian, Strother
c) J
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 88-302
RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND
ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT
WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed to make the following
improvements:
I.C. 52-157 (Riverview Road in Section 36)
and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the
improvements, pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Chapter 429.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council:
That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study
with the assistance of H.T.P.O., and that a feasibility report shall be
prepared and presented to the City Council with all convenient speed
advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost
assessment and feasibility of the proposed improvements.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on December 20, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Names of Petitioners
ust Be Property Owners)
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
To The Eden Prairie City Council:
The undersigned property owners herein petition the Eden Prairie City
Council to consider making the following described improvements(s):
(General Location)
sic Sanitary Sewer fa/4-19
gatermain
Storm Sewer
Street Paving
. Other
Street Address or Other
Legal Description of
Property to be Served
136=1,C_ OAS
(For City Use)
Date Received
Project No.
Council Consideration
re ,
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-303
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
BURGER KING EDEN PRAIRIE ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of BURGER KING EDEN PRAIRIE ADDITION has been submitted in
a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and
under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been
duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for BURGER KING EDEN PRAIRIE ADDITION is
approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City
Engineer's report on this plat dated DECEMBER 15, 1988.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of
this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named
plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the
certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon
compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on DECEMBER 20, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
04)
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician
DATE: December 15, 1988
SUBJECT: BURGER KING EDEN PRAIRIE ADDITION
PROPOSAL: Burger King Corporation has requested City Council approval of
t
h
e
final plat of Burger King Eden Prairie Addition. Located
i
n
t
h
e
southeast corner of State Highway 5 and County Road 4, the plat c
o
n
t
a
i
n
s
2.08 acres to be divided into two lots and right-of-way dedicat
i
o
n
f
o
r
State Highway 5 and County Road 4. Lot 1 contains 1.50 acres an
d
i
s
t
h
e
present location for the Burger King restaurant. Lot 2 contai
n
s
0
.
5
8
acres that will contain the proposed 3,000 square-foot Redburn
O
f
f
i
c
e
Building.
HISTORY: Second reading of Ordinance 45-88 changing zoning from Rural t
o
Office on 0.58 acres was finally read and approved by the City
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
November 1, 1988.
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on Octob
e
r
4
,
1
9
8
8
per Resolution 88-224.
The Developers Agreement referred to within this report was
e
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
November 1, 1988.
VARIANCES: All variance requests must be approved by the Board of Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal streets and utilities necessary to serve
this site are in place.
There is a publicly owned storm sewer that bisects Lot 1 fr
o
m
T
e
r
r
e
y
Pine Drive north to the Highway 5 right-of-way. Prior to relea
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
final plat, the plat shall be revised to show a drainage an
d
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
easement over this publicly owned storm sewer.
PARK DEDICATION: The requirements of park dedication are covered in the
Developers Agreement and shall conform to City Code.
BONDING: Bonding shall conform to City Code requirements.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Burger King Eden
Prairie Addition subject to the requirements of this repo
r
t
,
t
h
e
Developers Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $250.00.
JJ:ssa
cc: Bud Redburn
Spencer Kluegel
Burger King Corporation
'!3116
Sutliff Property
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 53-88
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the Rural District and be placed in the R1-13.5 District.
Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
R1-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in
City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are emended
accordingly.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 15th day of November, 1988, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 20th day of
December, 1988.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
EXHIBIT A
That part of the Southern 120 feet of North 491 feet of Government lot 2 lying West
of County Road No. 4 and East of a line running at right angles to the North line of
said lot from a point therein distance of 1598.43 feet West from Northeast corner of
section,
and,
That part of South 125 feet of North 616 feet of Government Lot 2 lying westerly of
County Road No.4 and Easterly of a line running South as Measured at right angles
from a point in North line of section distance of 1598.43 feet West from Northeast
corner thereof.
Sutliff Property
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-287
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE 53-88 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 53-88 was adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 20th day of December,
1988;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 53-88, which is
attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said
text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said
ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 53-88 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein,
within 20 days after said publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on December 20, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
c')
Sutliff Property
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 53-88
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located at 7070 and
7080 Eden Prairie Road from the Rural District to the R1-13.5 District. Exhibit A
included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
/s/John D. Frane
/s/Gary D. Peterson
City Clerk Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
, 1989.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
?ALI
MIS Systems Expansion
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 55-88
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the Rural District and be placed in the 1-5 District.
Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be,
and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
1-5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in
City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended
accordingly.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 15th day of November, 1988, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 20th day of
December, 1988.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
V
3IK
Lskt-i iBIT A
PROPOSED REZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Thal part of Lot 1, Block 1, TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS which lies West of the East line the West 75 rods
of the East half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 15, lying Southeasterly of the following
described line: Commencing at a point of the East line of said West 75 rods lying 871.65 feet South
of the Southerly right-of-way line of said Trunk Highway No. 5; thence deflecting right 67 degrees
24 minutes 31 seconds to said line lying 600 feet West of and parallel to the East line of said West
75 rods.
ALSO
That part of Lot 1, Block 1, TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS, which lies East of the West 75 rods of the East
half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 15 lying Southeasterly of the following described line:
Commencing at a point in the East line of said West 75 rods of the East half of the Northwest Quarter
of Section 15, Township 116, Range 22 distant 871.65 feet South of the Southerly right-of-way
line of said Highway No. 5; thence Northeasterly at an angle of 59 degrees 37 minutes 36 seconds
with said line to the Southerly right-of -way line of said State Highway No. 5.
EXCEPT that part lying Easterly of a line described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the Southeasterly line of said Lot 1, distant 642.50 feet Southwesterly of
the most Easterly corner of said Lot 1, thence North 38 degrees 33 minutes 13 seconds West,at
right angles to the Southeasterly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 225.00 feet; thence North 0
degrees East to the Northerly line of said Lot 1, and there terminating.
For the above rezoning legal descriptions, the West line of said Lot 1 is assumed to have a bearing ol
North 0 degrees 38 minutes 02 seconds East, per the plat of Technology Campus.
MIS Expansion
SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
This Supplement to Developer's Agreement made and entered into as of this
day of , 1988, by and between MIS Systems Corporation,
a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as Developer, and the City of Eden
Prairie, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City;"
WHEREAS, MIS Systems Corporation and City made and entered into a
Developer's Agreement, dated July 20, 1982, for MIS Planned Unit Development (the
"Developer's Agreement"); and,
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend said agreement for a portion of the
property referred to in said agreement, that portion of the property being as
described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties thereto as follows:
1. The Developer's Agreement shall be and hereby is supplemented and amended in
the following respects:
A. Paragraph 1. shall be amended to read as follows:
Developer shall plat and develop the property in conformance with
the revised material dated November 3, 1988, reviewed and approved
by the City Council on November 15, 1988, and attached hereto as
Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided
herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain
the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein.
B. There shall be added paragraphs 6. - 10. as follows:
6. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and
observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as
provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements,
and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and
made a part hereof.
7. Prior to release by the City of any permit for building on
the property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer,
and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for
sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, and erosion control for
the property. Said plans shall include appropriate utility
easements for the proposed utility extensions to the
property.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall
construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements
listed above in said plans, as approved by the City
Engineer, in accordance with the Exhibit C. attached hereto.
8. Prior to issuance of any building permit on the property,
Developer agrees to submit to the Director of Planning, and
to obtain the Director's approval of, plans for screening of
the mechanical equipment on the property, both for the
existing and proposed mechanical equipment for the
structures. Said screening shall be designed and
constructed with materials which are architecturally
compatible with the exterior materials on the existing and
proposed structures on the property.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer agrees
to implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements
listed above, as approved by the Director of Planning, in
accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C,
attached hereto.
9. Developer shall notify the City and Watershed District at
least 48 hours prior to grading on the property.
10. Prior to development beyond that represented in Exhibit 13,
attached hereto, Developer agrees to submit to the City for
review, and obtain the City's approval of information
required for Site Plan Review, including, but not limited
to, architectural elevations, site plans, grading plans,
utility plans, landscaping plans, and other plans as may be
required for further development or construction upon the
property.
The City's review process in this respect shall be
consistent with that customarily afforded to all other
developer's of 1-5 zoned property requiring site plan review
prior to issuance of building permits.
2. MTS Systems agrees to all of the terms and conditions and accepts the
obligations of the "Owner" under the Developer's Agreement, as amended and
supplemented herein.
'30
PROPOSED REZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
hat part of Lot 1, Block 1, TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS which lies West of the East line the West 75 rods
of the East half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 15, lying Southeasterly of the following
described line: Commencing at a point of the East line of said West 75 rods lying 871.65 feet South
of the Southerly right-of-way line of said Trunk Highway No. 5; thence deflecting right 67 degrees
24 minutes 31 seconds to said line lying 600 feet West of and parallel to the East line of said West
75 rods.
AL9D
That part of Lot 1, Block 1, TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS, which lies East of the West 75 rods of the East
half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 15 lying Southeasterly of the following described line:
Commencing at a point in the East line of said West 75 rods of the East half of the Northwest Quarter
of Section 15, Township 116, Range 22 distant 871.65 feet South of the Southerly right-of-way
line of said Highway No. 5; thence Northeasterly at an angle of 59 degrees 37 minutes 36 seconds
with said line to the Southerly right-of-way line of said State Highway No. 5.
EXCEPT that part lying Easterly of a line described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the Southeasterly line of said Lot 1, distant 642.50 feet Southwesterly of
the most Easterly corner of said Lot 1, thence North 38 degrees 33 minutes 13 seconds West,at
right angles to the Southeasterly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 225.00 feet; thence North 0
degrees East to the Northerly line of said Lot 1, and there terminating.
--'or the above rezoning legal descriptions, the West line of said Lot 1 is assumed to have a bearing of
Aorth 0 degrees 38 minutes 02 seconds East, per the plat of Technology Campus.
PROPOSED REZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
'hat part of Lot 1, Block 1, TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS which lies West of the East line the West 75 rods
of the East half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 15, lying Southeasterly of the following
described line: Commencing at a point of the East line of said West 75 rods lying 871.65 feet South
of the Southerly right-of-way line of said Trunk Highway No. 5; thence deflecting right 67 degrees
24 minutes 31 seconds to said line lying 600 feet West of and parallel to the East line of said West
75 rods.
ALSO
That part of Lot 1, Block 1, TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS, which lies East of the West 75 rods of the East
half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 15 lying Southeasterly of the following described line:
Commencing at a point in the East line of said West 75 rods of the East half of the Northwest Quarter
of Section 15, Township 116, Range 22 distant 871.65 feet South of the Southerly right-of-way
line of said Highway No. 5; thence Northeasterly at an angle of 59 degrees 37 minutes 36 seconds
with said line to the Southerly right-of-way line of said State Highway No. 5.
EXCEPT that part lying Easterly of a line described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the Southeasterly line of said Lot 1, distant 642.50 feet Southwesterly of
the most Easterly corner of said Lot 1, thence North 38 degrees 33 minutes 13 seconds West,at
right angles to the Southeasterly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 225.00 feet; thence North 0
degrees East to the Northerly line of said Lot 1, and there terminating.
or the above rezoning legal descriptions, the West line of said Lot 1 is assumed to have a bearing of
,lorth 0 degrees 38 minutes 02 seconds East, per the plat of Technology Campus.
0,0
MIS Systems Expansion
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-288
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE 55-88 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 55-88 was adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 20th day of December,
1988;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 55-88, which is
attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said
text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said
ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of tne City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 55-88 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
along with proof of publication required by paragraph 8 herein,
within 20 days after said publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on December 20, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
la!
MIS Systems Expansion
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 55-88
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located south of
Highway #5, north of Technology Drive, west of Purgatory Creek, from the Rural
District to the 1-5 District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's
agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal
description of this property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
/s/John D. Frane
/s/Gary D. Peterson
City Clerk
Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
• 1989.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
Sherwin-Williams
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 54-88
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY RErERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Commercial Regional Service
District.
Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be,
and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
Commercial Regional Service District, and the legal descriptions of land in each
District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph 13,
shall be, and are amended accordingly.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 15th day of November, 1988, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 20th day of
December, 1988.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
.31).;_)
Exhibit A
Legal Description
Outlot C, MENARD'S 4TH ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Sherman-Williams
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of
, 1988, by
Sherwin-Williams Company, an Ohio corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Change from Rural
to Commercial Regional Service on 0.968 acre and Preliminary Plat of 0.968 acre into
one lot for construction of a 7,020 sq. ft. retail paint store, situated in Hennepin
County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and
made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #54-88,
Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of
said property as follows:
1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the
materials revised and dated November 10, 1988, reviewed and approved
by the City Council on November 14, 1988, and attached hereto as
Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided
herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain
the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by
Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of
all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Prior to release of the final plat by the City, Developer agrees to
apply for and obtain a variance for rear yard setback from the Board
of Appeals.
4. Prior to release of the final plat for the property, Developer shall
submit to the City, and obtain the City's approval of, executed
cross-access easements which allow for access to Plaza Drive for the
property from established access to Plaza Drive through the Menard's
parcel to the north.
:31as
5. Prior to release by the City of the final plat for the property,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City
Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water,
storm sewer, and erosion control for the property. Said plans shall
include appropriate utility easements for the proposed utility
extensions to the property.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or
cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said
plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit
C, attached hereto.
6. Developer shall notify the City and the Watershed District 48 hours
prior to any grading, tree removal, or tree cutting on the property.
7. Prior to issuance of any building permit on the property, Developer
agrees to submit to the Director of Planning, and to obtain the
Director's approval of the following:
A. Samples of the exterior building materials to be implemented
on the property, including the textures, colors, and styles
of said materials.
B. An overall lighting plan, including size, color, and style
of lighting standards to be implemented on the property.
C. An overall signage plan, including size, color, and style of
lettering, to be implemented on the property.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer agrees to
implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements listed
above, as approved by the Director of Planning, in accordance with
the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
8. Prior to issuance of any permit for building on the property,
Developer agrees to submit to the Board of Appeals and to obtain the
Board's for a variance from Chapter 11 of the City Code for minimum
rear yard setback as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
Sherwin Williams
OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of
, 1988, by
and between Menard's, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"Owner," and the City of Eden Prairie, hereinafter referred to as "City:"
For and in consideration of, and to induce, City to adopt Ordinance #54-88
changing the zoning of the property owned by Owner from the Rural District to the
Commercial Regional Service District, as more fully described in that certain
Developer's Agreement entered into as of
, 1988, by and between
Sherwin Williams and City, Owner agrees with the City as follows:
1. If Sherwin Williams fails to proceed in accordance with the
Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner
shall not oppose the rezoning of the property to Rural.
2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner,
their successors, heirs, and assigns of the property.
3. If the Owner transfers such property, Owner shall obtain an
agreement from the transferree requiring that such transferee agree
to the terms of the Developer's Agreement.
CITY
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
l a')
Sherwin-Williams
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-289
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE 54-88 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 54-88 was adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 20th day of December,
1988;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 54-88, which is
attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said
text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said
ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
Inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 54-88 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
along with proof of publication required-by paragraph B herein,
within 20 days after said publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on December 20, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
3
Sherwin-Williams
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 54-88
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located along Plaza
Drive in front of the Menard's Center, from the Rural District to the Commercial
Regional Service District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's
agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal
description of this property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
/s/John D. Frane
/s/Gary D. Peterson
City Clerk
Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
, 1989.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
Councilmember introduced the following
Resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF A PROGRAM FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
(ELIM SHORES, INC., PROJECT) TO THE MINNESOTA
HOUSING AGENCY
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Housing
Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C (the "Act"), a City is
authorized by its housing plan to carry out programs for the
financing of multifamily housing for rental primarily to elderly
and/or handicapped persons as described in Subdivision 4 of
Section 462C.05; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota by Resolution 82-27 adopted on February 2, 1982, has
heretofore approved a comprehensive guide plan and housing
assistance plan (the "Housing Plan") following a public hearing
required by and otherwise in compliance with the requirements of
Section 462C.01(a)(b)(c) and Section 462C.04, Subd. 1; and
WHEREAS, the Act (§462C.04, Subd. 2) requires approval
of a program after a public hearing held thereon after
publication of notice in a newspaper of general circulation in
the City at least fifteen days in advance of the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie (the "City") has on
November 15, 1988 conducted a public hearing, after publication
of notice as required by the Act, for the Program for the
Construction of a Multifamily Housing Development (Elim Shores,
Inc. Project) (herein, the "Program") and issuance of housing
revenue bonds to finance a housing development described in said
notice (the "Project") to be owned by Elim Homes, Inc. or Elim
Shores, Inc. (collectively, the "Company"); and
WHEREAS, the Act further requires submission of the
Program to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (the "MHFA") for
its approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Eden Prairie that:
1. The Program is hereby amended by revising the
definition of "Qualified Project Period" to read as follows:
(12) "Qualified Project Period" for the set
aside of 20% of the Housing Units shall mean
a period beginning on the later of the first
day on which at least 10 percent of the units
in the Projects are first occupied or the
date of issue of the Bonds for the Project
and ending on the date which is the earlier
of (i) the date on which all Bonds are
redeemed or (ii) the date which is 28 years
after the date on which at least 50 percent
of the units in the Project are first
occupied, but in no event shall such period
be less than 12 years from the date on which
at least 50 percent of the units in the
Project are first occupied.
2. The Program is further amended by the addition of
the following sentence under Subsection C on Page 4
t
h
e
r
e
o
f
:
"The Company has requested the City to fund
an interest write down program with tax
increments from the Project."
3. The Program if further amended by revising the
third sentence in the second paragraph to read as fo
l
l
o
w
s
:
It is estimated that market rents for the Housing Uni
t
s
will be between $620 and $1,160 and subsidized rents
will range from $370 to $510 (as further described
in the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Elim
Shores, Inc. Project).
4. That the Program (as amended) is hereby in all
redpects adopted, and it is further found and determi
n
e
d
t
h
a
t
said Program (as amended) is consistent with the Cit
y
'
s
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
-
Plan as presently constituted and approved by the Cit
y
a
n
d
t
h
e
Metropolitan Council.
5 The City Manager is hereby authorized to submit
the Program (as amended) to the MHFA, and to do all o
t
h
e
r
t
h
i
n
g
s
and take all other actions as may be necessary or app
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
t
o
carry out the Program (as amended) in accordance with
t
h
e
A
c
t
a
n
d
any other applicable laws and regulations.
Adopted by the City Council, the City of Ede.,:.rairie, Minnesota, this 13th day of December, 1988.
Mayor
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution
was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopte
d
.
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL TO A REVISED TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN IN CONNECTION WITH
THE ELIM SHORES, INC. PROJECT UNDER CHAPTER
469, MINNESOTA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the
"City") has established the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
in and for the City of Eden Prairie (the "Authority") for the
purpose, among others, to undertake tax increment projects under
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 469 (the "Act");
WHEREAS, Elim Homes, Inc., a Minnesota nonprofit
corporation acting on behalf of itself and for Elim Shores, Inc.,
an affiliated Minnesota nonprofit corporation (collectively, the
"Developer") has filed a proposal dated August 12, 1988 with the
City (the "Proposal") requesting that the City and the Authority
approve a project which will consist of the acquisition of the
real property described on Exhibit A attached hereto and the
construction thereon of a 64-unit housing facility and related
common recreation and support facilities for rental to elderly
persons and families of low and moderate income (the "Project");
and
WHEREAS, the Developer has requested the approvalAat
an interest reduction program for the Project as permitted by the
Act (Minnesota Statutes §469.176, Subd. 4(b)) to be funded with
revenues derived from a tax increment financing plan; and
WHEREAS, based in part upon the representations of the
Developer in the Proposal (in particular, pages 5 and 6 thereof)
the Project is not reasonably expected to occur solely through
private investment within the reasonable forseeable future and,
accordingly, tax increment financing is deemed necessary to
encourage the development of the Project and to serve the
purposes of the Act as more fully set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, based upon the Proposal and other information
provided to the Authority, the Authority preliminarily
determined on October 18, 1988 that it is necessary and
appropriate to proceed with the Project and approved a Tax
Increment Financing Plan on such date (the "Tax Increment
Financing Plan"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, subd.
2 and 3, (i) all notices and information have been given in
timely fashion to the members of the county board of
commissioners and (ii) affected school districts have been given
the opportunity to present their comments on the Tax Increment
Financing Plan; and
WHEREAS, earlier on this date the Authority adopted a
resolution approving certain minor revisions to the Tax Increment
Financing Plan (as revised, the "Revised Tax Increment Financing
Plan"):
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Revised Tax Increment Financing Plan for Elim
Shores Project as attached hereto as Schedule I is hereby
incorporated by reference herein as if set forth in full herein,
including (i) the establishment of the tax increment financing
district as a housing district and (ii) the findings,
expectations, estimates and determinations set forth therein.
2. The Tax Increment Financing Plan is hereby
determined to be in full compliance with the provisions of the
Act including, without limitation, Minnesota Statutes §469.175,
Subd. 1 and is hereby approved.
3. The Interest Reduction Program authorized by the
Authority on this date is hereby approved, ratified and
authorized.
4. The City Manager and such other officers of the
City as may be selected by the Manager, with the advice of the
City Attorney, are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to
negotiate a form of Interest Reduction Assessment Agreement and a
Development Agreement, together with such other and further
documents in the lorm and content consistent with this Resolution
and the Revised Tax Increment Financing Plan, as shall be
necessary or appropriate and to do all such acts and other things
and to execute all such documents as be necessary to carry out
and comply with the provisions thereof.
5. The City Manager, Mayor and City Clerk, with the
advice of the City Attorney, are hereby authorized and directed
to do all such other acts and things and to execute all such
other documents as be necessary to carry out and comply with the
provisions of this Resolution and the documents approved hereby,
and all of the acts and doings of the City Manager, Mayor, City
Clerk and other representatives of the City which are in
conformity with the intent and purposes of this Resolution,
whether heretofore or hereafter taken or done, shall be and are
hereby ratified, confirmed and approved.
6. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
request the county auditor to certify the original assessed value
of the tax increment financing district established hereby
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, §469.177.
'3 13,4
Approved and adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota this day of
December, 1988.
Mayor
ATTEST:
1 35
ORDINANCE NO. 63 -88
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING
CITY CODE CHAPTER 11 BY ADDING SECTION 11.80, THE OFFICIAL MAP,
AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1, EXCEPT SECTION
1.09 THEREOF.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. City Code Chapter 11, shall be and is amended by
adding Sec. 11.80 to read as follows:
Sec. 11.80. Official Map. There is adopted
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, S462.359
(1986), the Official Map entitled, "Minnesota
Department of Transportation S. P. 2762
(T.H. 212) Official Map West Hennepin
County Line to Junction of T.H. 5
and T.H. 494" on file and open to public
inspection in the office of the City
Manager, which Official Map contains a
description of the future layout of State
Highway 212 through the City and the lands
which will be affected by reason thereof.
Section 2. City Code Chapter I entitled "General
Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code
Including Penalty For a Violation", except Sec. 1.09 thereof is
hereby adopted in its entirety, by reference, as though repeated
verbatim herein.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall become effective from and
after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Eden Prairie on the 20th day of December
1988, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a
regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 3rd
January day of , 1989.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the
, 198 .
day of
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 088-290
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF STARVIEW TERRACE FOR
PATRICK BAUER
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Starview Terrace for Patrick Bauer, dated December 16,
1988, consisting of 15.62 acres into 26 single family lots, 2 outlots, and road
right-of-way, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in
conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances,
and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 20th day of December, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
'PROPOSED SITE
PUB
AREA LOCATION MAP
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
October 7, 1988
Starview Terrace
West side of Starring Lake, west of Mitchell Road
Patrick Bauer
1. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 15.72 acres.
2. Preliminary Plat of 15.72 acres into 30 single family lots,
two outlots, and road right-of-way.
Background
This site is currently designated on
the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide
Plan for development as Low Density
Residential land uses. The adjacent
properties to the north, south, and
west, are also guided for Low
Density Residential. The property
to the east, adjacent to Starring
Lake, is guided for Public Open
Space. Specific land uses in this
area include large lot single family
development to the north, south, and
west, and Starring Lake to the east.
The proponent is requesting a zoning
district change from Rural to I1-
13.5 and a preliminary plat of
approximately 15.72 acres into 30
single family lots and two outlots.
Site Plan/Preliminary Plat
This site, containing 15.72 acres,
will be subdivided into 30 single
family lots and two outlots at a
gross density of 1.9 units per acre.
Lot sizes within the subdivision
Starview 2 October 7, 1988
range from a maximum of 46,955 square feet to a minimum of 14,000 square feet. The average lot size is 19,300 square feet. All of the lots meet the minimum
requirement of the R1-13.5 zoning district.
Outlot A, containing 3,434 square feet, will be given to Leland Kottke, the
homeowner to the south, in order to provide an adequate side yard setback, and
Outlot B, containing 5,181 square feet, will be part of a land swap with David
Kramer.
Due to the location of this project adjacent large lot single family to the west,
concern regarding transition has been raised. The adjacent property is subdivided
into five lots which average approximately 47,480 square feet. The lots within
Block 1 average 14,924 square feet. Because of the lot size difference and the
expected distance between structures, one alternative to provide a transition would
be to eliminate a lot within Block I. This would allow the acreage to be
distributed among the remaining nine lots to increase lot size and lot width.
Another concern are the skewed lot lines adjacent to Mitchell Road. It is
anticipated that skewed lot lines may cause difficulties in actual building
placement and cause concern amoung future homeowners regarding property ownership.
Staff recommends that the lot lines be perpendicular to Queen's Trail. Finally, the
lots adjacent Mitchell Road average 153 feet in depth. In reviewing the Starrwood
Addition, Staff recommended that the lot depths adjacent to Research Road be
Increased to provide a buffer between the road and the proposed homes. The average
lot depth adjacent to Research Road within the Starrwood Addition is 175 feet.
Staff recommends that Lots 5-9, Block 3, be increased to a minimum of 175 feet in
depth.
Access to this site would be provided from Mitchell Road by a single street which
creates a "t" intersection on top of the hill. Victoria Drive, as shown on the
plat, will provide access to the adjacent properties. Because the street cannot be
built to the southerly-most property line, the proponent must provide surety for the
street and sidewalk construction. In addition, temporary cul-de-sac signs should be
installed at the ends of Victoria Drive to inform future homeowner's that a street
connection will made.
Shorel and Ordinance
Because Starring Lake has been classified as Recreational Development Waters,
development within 1,000 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark is subject to
shoreland regulations. The subdivision has been designed so that no lots have been
classified as abutting. Because of this, the following requirements of the
Shoreland Ordinance apply:
1. Building height should not exceed 30 feet.
2. Impervious surface shall not exceed 30% of the total lot a qa.
3. The structure shall be placed on an elevation 2 feet above the 100-year
flood elevation.
All of the lots meet the minimum requirements of the Shoreland Ordinance.
Starview 3 October 7, 1988
Grading
Elevations on this site range from high points of 898 adjacent to the southern
property line and 894 adjacent to the north property line, to a low point of 828
adjacent to Mitchell Road. The site slopes in an easterly direction with existing
slopes between 15% and 25%. Significant grading occurs with approximately 4 feet of
cut along the north and west property lines, approximately 12 feet of cut along the
south property line, and approximately 30 feet of cut for Lot 9, Block 2.. This is
necessary to allow for building pads adjacent to the west side of the road and also
for road construction. One consequence of the proposed grading is that the face of
the hill will be moved back from Mitchell Road approximately 250 feet. Maximum fill
amount includes approximately 25 feet within the ravine on Lot 3, Block 3.
Preliminary cut and fill calculations indicate that there is approximately 70,000
cubic yards of excess material. In reviewing the overall grading plan, alternatives
have been suggested to the proponent in order to reduce the amount of grading on the
site:
1. Remove Lots 7-11, Block 2. By reducing the slope on the hill to 4:1, the
overall maximum cut can be reduced to approximately 12 feet which is 18
feet less tnan what is proposed. With this alternative, the hill, although
reshaped, retains some of the existing character. The downside of this
alternative is the reduction in number of lots from 30 to 25. If this
alternative were selected, it should be done in conjunction with other
recommendations including the relocation of Victoria Drive, approximately
30 feet to the east, and the relocation of Queen's Drive, approximately 20
feet to the west, to increase the lot depths adjacent to Mitchell Road and
the large lot single family homes to the west.
2. Remove Lots 9-11, Block 2. This alternative reduces the amount of overall
grading which helps to save the hill although not as extensively as
Alternative 01. This plan would allow the development of 27 lots.
3. Finally, if the number of units are acceptable, the rear yard areas could be
reduced to a maximum of 30 feet. However, because the proposed building
pads measure 40 feet where a typical pad measures 50 feet, additional rear
yard grading can be expected. It appears that with this alternative, no
significant reduction in grading can be achieved.
Utilities
Utility service is available to this project through a 16-inch water line and 8-inch
sanitary sewer line located within new Mitchell Road. An 8-inch water line and an
8-inch sanitary sewer will be extended through Queen's Trail and Victoria Trail to
service the project site.
A series of catch basins are designed to be located throughout the street system to
collect run-off. Because the entire site slopes towards Starring Lake, additional
catch basins may be needed. Detailed engineering review of Lots 7-11, Block 2, is
required to ensure adequate drainage.
Pedestrian Systems
With this development, a five-foot concrete sidewalk is located along the streets
within the project and a connection made to Mitchell Road. An 8-foot bituminous
trail is located within Starring Lake Park.
1*1
Starview 4 October 7, 1988
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
If the Planning Commission feels that the transition to t
h
e
s
i
n
g
l
e
f
a
m
i
l
y
h
o
m
e
s
t
o
the west and that the overall grading plan is acceptable
,
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
could recommend approval of the Starview Terrace projec
t
b
a
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
p
l
a
n
s
d
a
t
e
d
September 12, 1988, and subject to the Staff Report da
t
e
d
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
7
,
1
9
8
8
,
a
n
d
subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Revise the grading plan to show consistent lot lines
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
preliminary plat.
B. Revise the plans to eliminate the skewed lot lines and t
o
d
e
p
i
c
t
a
n
increased lot depth for Lots 5-9, Block 3,
2. Prior to Final Plat review, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion contro
l
p
l
a
n
s
f
o
r
review by the Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off, utility, and eros
i
o
n
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
plans, for the City Engineeer.
3. Prior to Grading permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours
i
n
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
of any grading.
B. Stake the construction limits with erosion control fencing.
C. Submit surety for the completion of Victoria Drive and the
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
.
4. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall pay the
C
a
s
h
P
a
r
k
F
e
e
.
5. Concurrent with street construction, temporary cul-de-s
a
c
s
i
g
n
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
installed at the ends of Victoria Drive.
On the other hand, if the Planning Commission feels that
a
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
s
i
n
g
l
e
family homes to the west is needed and that the gra
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
excessive, the Planning Commission could recommend one
o
f
t
h
e
t
h
r
e
e
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
previously presented. Staff recommends Alternative #1 and
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
be continued for 30 days in order to allow the developer
t
i
m
e
t
o
m
a
k
e
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
revisions.
T110
AREA LOCATION MAP
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
November 25, 1988
Starview Terrace
West side of Starring Lake, west of Mitchell Road
Patrick Bauer
1. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 15.72 acres.
2. Preliminary Plat of 15.72 acres into 26 single family lots,
2 outlots, and road right-of-way.
Background
This is a continued item from the
October 11 and November 14, 1988,
Planning Commission meetings. This
item was continued to allow for
revisions to the the proposed
grading plan as recommended by
Alternative #1 of the Staff Report
dated October 7, 1988.
Starview Terrace 2 November 25, 1988
Site Plan/Preliminary Plat
The major revision to the plan was a reduction in the number of lots from 30 to 26
which created the following changes:
Number of Lots
Minimum Lot Size
Maximum Lot Size
Average Lot Size
Density
Old Plan
30
14,000 sq. ft.
46,955 sq. ft.
19,300 sq. ft.
1.9 units/acre
New Plan
26
14,971 sq. ft.
65,509 sq. ft.
22,515 sq. ft.
1.65 units/acre
All of the lots meet the minimum requirements of the R1-13.5 zoning district.
Finally, with the relocation of Victoria Drive and Queen's Lane, the lots adjacent
the western property line have increased in depth from 140 feet to an average of
161.5 feet and from an average of 153 feet to 170 feet adjacent Mitchell Road.
Grading
By reducing the number of lots to 26, a signficant reduction in the amount of
grading is expected. The previous grading plan depicted cuts of approximately 4
feet along the north and west property lines, approximately 12 feet along the south
property line and approximately 30 feet within the center portion of the site. In
addition, because of the grading occuring for the building pads adjacent Queen's
Lane, the face of the hill would have been moved back approximately 250 feet.
Although the majority of the site is still being graded, the amount of cut will be
reduced from approximately 30 feet to approximately 10 feet within the center
portion of the site. The new plan also indicates that the face of the hill will be
moved back approximately 60 to 140 feet from Mitchell Road. The grading plan has
also been revised to reflect 80 foot building pads to accommodate the size of the
homes that are expected to be built within this subdivision.
Utilities
Utility service is available to this project through a 16-inch waterline and an 8-
inch sanitary sewer line located within new Mitchell Road.
A series of catch basins are located throughout the street system to collect run-off
from the entire project site. Because the entire site slopes towards Starring Lake,
additional catch basins may be needed. Detailed engineering review of the project
is required in ensure adequate drainage.
Pedestrian Systems
With this development, 5-foot concrete sidewalks are located along Victoria Drive
and Queen's lane which provide a connection to Mitchell Road and Staring Lake Park.
314
Starview Terrace 3 November 25, 1988
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval for the request from Patrick Bauer
f
o
r
a
Z
o
n
i
n
g
District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 15.72 acres, Preliminary
P
l
a
t
o
f
1
5
.
7
2
acres into 26 single family lots, 2 outlots, and road right-of-way, bas
e
d
u
p
o
n
p
l
a
n
s
dated November 17, 1988, and Staff Report dated November 25, 1988, a
n
d
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
the following conditions:
1. Prior to Final Plat review, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off, utility, and erosion control
plans for review by the City Engineer.
2. Prior to Grading permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading.
B. Stake the construction limits with erosion control fencing.
C. Submit surety for the completion of Victoria Drive and the sidewalk.
3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall pay the appropriate C
a
s
h
Park Fee.
4. Concurrent with street construction, temporary cul-de-sac signs shall
b
e
installed at the ends of Victoria Drive.
L43
31citi
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1/88-291
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ARBY'S FOR
HOMART DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Arby's for Homart Development Company, dated December
12, 1988, consisting of 3.4 acres into 2 lots, a copy of which is on file at the
City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie
Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 20th day of December, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
AREA LOCATION MAP
STAFF REPORT
Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
November 25, 1988
Arby's Restaurant
Northwest of the intersection of Frani° Road and Prairie Center
Drive.
Homart Development Company
1. Zoning District Change from Rural and Public to C-Regional
Service on 3.4 acres.
2. Preliminary Plat of 3.4 acres into 2 lots for the
construction of a commercial restaurant.
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Background
This site is currently guided
Regional Commercial. The 1973
Planned Unit Development for the
Homart Center depicted this site for
a combination of Commercial uses and
as a heavy vegetative buffer zone
(see Attachments A and 8). Part of
this site is zoned Public. Orig-
inally, Hennepin County contemplated
a library on this site. The
remainder of this site is zoned
Rural.
Rezoning
Homart is requesting rezoning over
the entire 3.4 acres. However,
specific plans are prepared only for
Arby's at this time. Homart does
not have a specific tenant in mind,
but has prepared a concept plan to
show how the balance of the site
could be developed. Section 11.25,
Subdivision 38, of the City Code,
indicates that Commercial zoning
Arby's Restaurant 2 November 25, 1988
request will be considered only on the basis of a Comprehensive Guide Plan and for
the entire area to be zoned and specific plans for initial structures and site
development. For this reason, only rezoning for Arby's should be considered at this
time.
Site Plan
The site plan depicts the construction of a 3,400 square foot restaurant on 1.15
acres of land at 0.7 Floor Area Ratio (FAR). Access off the private loop road is in
the location as recomAnded by BRW in the attached engineering study. The building
and parking areas meet the minimum setback per Ordinance. Parking is provided in
accordance with City Code.
Internal circulation will utilize a turn-around until the adjacent site develops at
which time there would be a shared access.
Traffic Study
This site is within the Major Center Area (MCA) traffic study. The p.m. peak hour
estimate is based on existing and approved development before the study was
completed. A total of 3,072 p.m. peak hour trips are estimated to be generated by
existing and approved uses within this area. Based upon what is built and approved
thus far, a total of 2,818 trips would be generated. This means that there is a
254-trip excess which can be allocated to the remaining undeveloped land. Since
Homart is in control of the undeveloped land, they would have the discretion to
allocate traffic. Arby's generates a total of 117 p.m. peak hour trips, which means
that 137 trips would remain for future development by Homart.
Grading
Since this site is relatively level, minimal grading will be necessary to provide a
level pad area for building and parking. There will be some berming provided within
the setback areas to screen parking.
Landscaping
In order to be consistent with the 1973 PUD approval for the Eden Prairie Center, a
50-foot landscaped setback is depicted on the site plan along Prairie Center Drive.
This should also be required for the balance of the site as shown on Homart's
concept plan. Homart is in agreement with this requirement. The landscape plan
meets the City Code requirements.
Utilities
Sewer and water is available to this site.
Pedestrian Systems
As part of the overall pedestrian system plan within the MCA, there should be a 5-
foot wide concrete sidewalk along Franlo Road and Prairie Center Drive connected to
Arby's. This would be consistent with recommendations for sidewalks along Prairie
Center Drive and minor roads with the Eden Square project to the west of this site
and the Lariat Center to the south.
Arby's Restaurant 3 November 25, 1988
Architecture
To provide continuity between the adjoining commercial Eden Square project, and
Firestone Building, colors and exterior materials should be similar for the brick.
Accent colors would provide variety to the project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the request for Rezoning and
Preliminary Plat for the Arby's Restaurant based upon plans dated November 25, 1988,
subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report, dated November 25, 1988, and
subject to the following conditions:
1. Rezoning for the Arby's Restaurant, based on 1.5 acres should only be
considered at this time. When specific plans are ready for the balance of
the site, rezoning would then be considered by the Planning Commission and
City Council.
2. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Modify the site plan to provide sidewalks along Franlo Road and
Prairie Center Drive.
3. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall:
A. Provide detailed storm water run-off, erosion control, and utility
plans for review by the City Engineer.
B. Provide detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
4. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Provide samples of the proposed exterior materials and colors for
review.
B. Provide the overall signage plan with details for review. Pylon
signage to meet Code and be constructed of materials and colors
similar to the building.
C. Provide the overall lighting plan with details for review. Parking
lot lighting should be downcast cut-off luminars.
D. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of
grading.
5. Concurrent with building and site construction, put the sidewalks in along
Prairie Center Drive and Franlo Road.
,(4 1 Attachment A
achment B
— 5 ,111717
1 Him:MU-A V.0 Si [(U JnfMs n InHDM
PRELIMINARY
HM H SUIJAHL
(op 1.070 500( SOW., • MINN( AH0115
PLANNING
TRANSPORTATION
ENGINEERING
ARCHITECTURE
001 5.S415 • P000E 612 ,3704700
,..,;:.',ZZ'LWOnleaSZIGULISCIIMICAZONGSMai
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 14, 1988
TO: Mr. Michael Franzen, Senior Planner
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
FROM: Nancy L. Heuer, PE
William Troe
RE: Homart Fast Food Restaurant Traffic Study
Backgrcund
Based on a request by the City of Eden Prairie, BRW examined the trip gene
r
a
t
i
o
n
from a proposed development adjacent to the Eden Prairie Center ring road
.
T
h
e
following memorandum documents the results of the analysis.
The devElopment, proposed by the Homart Development Corporation, is a 4,500
-
square-foot fast food restaurant. The proposed development is located adja
c
e
n
t
to the Eden Prairie Center, which is located in Zones 5 and 6 of the Major
Center Area. In past trip generation studies in he Major Center Area invo
l
v
i
n
g
changes to the assumed land use, the particular parcel being examined would
b
e
allocated a portion of the total trips being generated in the zone proportio
n
a
l
to the area of the parcel in relation to the area of the zone (i.e., if the
p
a
r
-
cel covers 20 percent of the zone, it would be allocated 20 percent of the
trips). For this analysis the trip generation of the area located within Zo
n
e
s
5 and 6 will be the basis for comparison, because this entire area has been
developed by the Homart Corporation. Instead of determining the number of tr
i
p
s
that in the 1985 study would be allocated to a parcel the size of the propos
e
d
site (3.46 acres), the number of trips generated from the particular parcel
w
e
r
e
compared to the total additional allocation of trips for the zones 5 and 6.
Should there be some additional allotment of trips for zones 5 and 6 after t
h
e
existing development trips are estimated, it would be up to Homart to determ
i
n
e
how the trips would be distributed across the undeveloped zones.
'Itariemorsesimicassausonswas
MINNEAPOLIS
DENVER PHOENIX
'6 I`S.6
Mr. Michael Franzen
July 14, 1988
Page 2
PRELIMINARY
In the 1985 Major Center Area study, it was assumed that zones 5 and 6 would be
developed as a combination of retail commercial, office, and restaurant pro-
perty. The study also found that the trips being generated in the Major Center
Area in the Year 2000 would have to be reduced by 20 percent in order for the
ultimate street system to handle the projected peak hour traffic volumes.
Trip Generation Estimates
The ultimate trip generation from the 1985 traffic study, for zones 5 and 6, is
documented in Table 1.
TABLE 1
ULTIMATE TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATE
Land Use
Office
Restaurant
Commercial
Bank
Units Daily Daily
(1000 S.F.) Trip Rate Trips
30
12.3 369
5
164.4 822
1,049
35.0 36,715
25
125.0 3,125
Peak Hour Peak Hour
Percent Trips
14.0%
52
6.4%
53
7.4%
2,717
8.0%
250
1,109
41,031
3,072
With 20 Percent Reduction
32,825
2,458
The estimated trip generation of existing developments in zones" 5 and 6 and the
Eden Square development (an approved 83,500-square-foot commercial development),
based on the 1985 traffic study trip rates, is documented in Table 2. In addi-
tion the table also includes trips generated from the proposed fast food devel-
opment, based on the 4th Edition 1TE Trip Generation Manual rates.
As the table shows, the number of trips being generated from zones 5 and 6 with
existing developments, Eden Square and the proposed development exceeds the 1985
study trip generation of 32,825 daily and 2,458 peak hour trips for the same
area. It should be noted that even without the Eden Square and the proposed
development trips, the estimated remaining trips generated from existing devel-
opments exceed the 1985 study allocation for zones 5 and 6.
'151
pir. Michael Franzen
July 14, 1988
Page 3 PRELIMINARY
TABLE 2
EXISTING AND COMMITTE
D
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
T
R
I
P
G
E
N
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
P
L
U
S
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
Units Daily
Daily
Peak Hour
Peak Hour
Land Use (1000 S.F.)
Trip Rate
Trips Percent Trips Office
Restaurant
Commercial
Bank
Target
Proposed Rest.
36.00
3.74
850.50
25.50
100.00
4.50
915.74
12.3 443
164.4 616
35.0 29,768
125.0
3,188
70.1
7,010
632.1 2,844
41,025
14.0%
6.4%
7.4%
8.0%
5.4%
5.3%
62
39
2,203
255
379
151
3,089 Note: Trip Generation
f
o
r
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
F
a
s
t
F
o
o
d
R
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
R
e
f
l
e
c
t
s
4th Edition ITE Trip
G
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
n
u
a
l
R
a
t
e
T• the 1985 traffic stud
y
,
t
h
e
t
r
i
p
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
r
a
t
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
s
q
u
a
r
e
-
f
o
o
t
•iercial increment in
Z
o
n
e
5
,
w
a
s
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
t
o
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
t
r
i
p
s
a
t
3
5
d
a
i
l
y
trips per 1000 square
f
e
e
t
.
S
i
n
c
e
t
h
e
s
t
u
d
y
w
a
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
,
t
h
e
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
s
q
u
a
r
e
-
foot increment has b
e
e
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
a
s
a
T
a
r
g
e
t
s
t
o
r
e
.
I
n
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
u
p
d
a
t
e
o
f
the study, the trip
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
r
a
t
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
a
r
c
e
l
o
c
c
u
p
i
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
T
a
r
g
e
t
s
t
o
r
e
is being modified to
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
t
h
e
r
a
t
e
f
o
r
a
d
i
s
c
o
u
n
t
r
e
t
a
i
l
s
t
o
r
e
.
T
h
i
s
c
h
a
n
g
e
doubles the estimated
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
d
a
i
l
y
t
r
i
p
s
b
e
i
n
g
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
a
n
d
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
s
t
h
e
peak hour generation
b
y
4
6
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
.
T
a
b
l
e
3
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
t
h
e
t
r
i
p
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
zones 5 and 6 with th
e
T
a
r
g
e
t
s
t
o
r
e
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
a
t
t
h
e
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
m
a
l
l
rate as assumed in th
e
1
9
8
5
s
t
u
d
y
.
A
s
i
t
s
h
o
w
s
,
t
h
e
d
a
i
l
y
a
n
d
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
t
r
i
p
generation with or wi
t
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
o
u
l
d
s
t
i
l
l
exceed the 1985 study
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
TABLE 3
TRIP GENERATION REFLE
C
T
I
N
G
M
O
D
I
F
I
E
D
T
A
R
G
E
T
T
R
I
P
R
A
T
E
Units Daily
Daily
Peak Hour
Peak Hour
Land Use (1000 S.F.)
Trip Rate
Trips Percent Trips Office
Restaurant
Commercial
Bank
Target
,roposed Rest.
36.00
3.74
850.50
25.50
100.00
4.50
915.74
12.3 443
164.4 616
35.0 29,768
125.0
3,188
35.0
3,500
632.1 2,844
37,515
14.0%
6.4%
7.4%
8.0%
7.4%
5.3%
62
39
2,203
255
259
151
2,90 Note: Trip Generatio
n
f
o
r
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
F
a
s
t
F
o
o
d
R
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
R
e
f
l
e
c
t
s
4th Edition ITE Trip
G
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
n
u
a
l
R
a
t
e
.
Rate for Target is th
e
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
T
r
i
p
Rate.
9)16(dN
Mr. Michael Franzen
PRELIMINARY
July 14, 1988
Page 4
Trip Generation Summary
Based on the above trip generation comparisons, it would be expected that with
or without the proposed fast food development, zones 5 and 6 would be generating
more trips than allocated in the 1985 traffic study for the Major Center Area.
In the peak hour of travel the existing plus Eden Square trip generation would
exceed the 1985 study allotment by between 360 and 480 trips depending on the
generation rate of the Target store. Thus, a reduction in existing trip genera-
tion of between 15 and 19 percent would be needed to meet the 1985 study alloca-
tion. With the proposed fast food development, the estimated trip generation
will exceed the area allotment by between 511 and 631 trips in the peak hour.
Thus, with the fast food restaurant the daily trip generation would need to be
lowered by 21 to 26 percent in the peak hour.
NH/jkf
PLANNING
TRANSPORTATION
ENGINEERING
ARCHITECTURE
BENNE TT RINGROSE WOLSEELO PAWS GARDNER INC OAR SONAR' 1111140 5E10EE 501116 • MINNE APOL 15 MN 55415 • RmONE 612 370-0700
,27.2twagarrA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 22, 1988
TO: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
FROM: Nancy L. Heuer, P.E.
RE: Zone 6 Fast Food Restaurant Driveway Location
As requested by the City of Eden Prairie, BRW has reviewed potential driveway
locations for the proposed fast food restaurant located south of Eden Prairie
Center. Proper driveway locations are dependent on the circulation needs of the
development; however, the following general conclusions have been reached:
o Access to the site should not be provided to/from the driveway connection
between Prairie Center Drive and the shopping center ring road.
o The driveway to the parcel should be located a minimum of 150 feet from the
centerline of the inbound driveway connection between Prairie Center Drive
and the ring road. This would provide a reasonable distance for the dri-
vers of vehicles turning right from the driveway connection to assess traf-
fic conditions at the proposed entrance and make necessary speed
adjustments. This location would also place the proposed entrance at
approximately the location of the access aisle to the Sears' parking lot.
Curb radii should be designed to allow relatively free movement into the
site.
o It is recommended that the parcel driveway be placed approximately 200 feet
or more from the centerline of the inbound driveway connection between
Prairie Center Drive and the ring road. This location would provide addi-
tional stacking distance so that the driveway to the parcel would be less
likely to be blocked by vehicles waiting on the east approach to the drive-
way connection/ring road intersection.
o The entrance and exit could be either adjacent or at separate locations
and, if possible, should be aligned with existing parking lot aisles.
NH/1pm
1..matnestav
Crilill61111NISIRIMISEPIN
MNNEAPOUS DENVER PHOENIX
'66-q
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #88-292
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF MARCUS DEVELOPMENT FOR
MARCUS CORPORATION
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Marcus Development for Marcus Corporation, dated
December 12, 1988, consisting of 1.61 acres into 2 lots and 1 outlot, a copy of
which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions
of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is
herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 20th day of December, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, May
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
3 ,
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: November 25, 1988
PROJECT: Marcus Development
LOCATION: East of Highway #169, west of Joiner Way, south of Prairie Center
Drive.
APPLICANT: Marcus Corporation
FEE OWNER: DYS Properties
REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to C-Regional Service on
0.65 acres, with variances.
2. Preliminary Plat of 1.61 acres into 2 lots and 1 outlot.
Background
This item was previously reviewed at
the August 22, 1988, Planning
Commission meeting. In order to
allow the proponent and Staff time
to research customer traffic and
overflow parking on the site, the
project was continued until the
September 12, 1988, Planning
Commission meeting. By letter,
dated September 9, 1988, Marcus
Development Corporation requested
that the item be withdrawn from
consideration until the parking lot
issue with Youngstedt's Service
Center was resolved.
The current proposal for a 3,300
square foot retail building has
resolved the parking and traffic
issues previously identified.
Site Plan/Preliminary Plat
The preliminary plat depicts the
division of a 1.61-acre tract into 2
31511
Marcus Development 2 November 25, 1988
lots and 1 outlot. Lot 1, the location of Youngstedt's Service Center, contains
38,939 square feet, while Lot 2 will contain 24,566 square feet. The current
proposal is for a 3,300 square foot retail building. A Base Area Ratio (B.A.R.) of
13.4% has been calculated and the building meets the minimum required setbacks of
the C-Regional Service Zoning District. A variance will be required for the common
driveway along the north property line.
Based upon a parking requirement of 8 spaces per 1,000 square feet, a total of 27
parking spaces are required. The site plan depicts 24 parking stalls on-site. To
accommodate overflow parking from Youngstedt's Service Center, 12 parking stalls are
being constructed along the south side of the building, 4 of which will be used to
meet the retail building parking requirements. A variance will be required for off-
site parking and parking setback.
Access into the project would be from Joiner Way. A drive-up window is proposed for
the previous location of the photo processing center. Because a tenant has not been
identified, concern has been raised regarding the amount of traffic this
unidentified use may generate and its effect on the site plan. When Proex was
originally identified as a tenant within this building, it was agreed that stacking
distance for two cars was acceptable. The current site plan provides that stacking
distance requirement. Assuming a "worst case" scenario, a stacking distance for
approximately 12 cars is recommended. Without major revisions to the plan including
a parking lot reconfiguration, increased driveway widths, and the addition of a
protective lane, the current proposal cannot accomodate the additional stacking
required. Because of this, Staff recommends that the drive-thru window be
eliminated.
Traffic
The 1985 MCA traffic study, conducted by BRW, estimated 177 daily trips and 15 trips
in the p.m. peak hour for this site. Based on the traffic study dated August 2,
1988, Staff has estimated that the current proposal would generate 116 daily trips
and 9 trips in the p.m. peak hour.
Grading/Utilities
The site has been previously graded in conjunction with the adjacent developments.
Minimal grading is to occur in order to allow for the construction of the building
pad and parking lot. There is a 6-foot berm adjacent U.S. 4169 to provide screening
to the parking areas with minimal berming occuring adjacent Joiner Way.
Water and sanitary sewer service is available to this site through connections made
to an 8-inch water and 8-inch sanitary sewer line located within Joiner Way. There
is a 78-inch storm sewer adjacent U.S. #169 which provides a connection for the
catch basin system. Other utilities on this project site include a 12-inch sanitary
sewer line located adjacent the southern property line and a Northern States Power
easement which is located over the western portion of the site.
Landscaping
lased upon a building size of 3,300 square feet, a total of 10 caliper inches of
plant material is required per City Code. The landscape plan depicts a total of 39
caliper inches. An irrigation system shall be installed to ensure plant survival.
Marcus Development 3 November 25, 1988
Architecture
The proposed building is a single-story structure with 2 tenants. Exterior building
materials include 81% facebrick, glass, or better and 19% stucco. In order to
develop an overall architectural consistency for buildings within this area, the
architect should incorporate similar building materials and colors as the adjacent
buildings including Youngstedt's Service Center, Rocky Rococo, and the Lariat
Center. Exterior building material samples and colors are subject to review prior
to building permit issuance.
Signage/Lighting
A pylon sign is proposed adjacent U.S. #169. The sign shall conform to City Code
with details reviewed prior to building permit issuance. Exterior lighting shall
Include 3 parking lot lights. Parking lot lighting shall be similar to those used
within the adjacent projects.
Pedestrian Systems
There is an existing 5-foot concrete sidewalk located along the west side of Joiner
Way. In order to complete the overall pedestrian system in this area, a 5-foot wide
concrete sidewalk shall be constructed on the south side of Prairie Center Drive
from U.S. #169 to Joiner Way.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval from Marcus Development Corporation for a Zoning District
Change from Rural to C-Regional Service on 0.65 acres, with variances, and the
Preliminary Plat of 1.61 acres into 2 lots and 1 outlot, subject to plans dated
November 14, 1988, subject to the Staff Report dated November 25, 1988, subject to
the following recommendations:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Provide samples and compatible colors of exterior building
materials.
Eliminate the drive-thru window.
2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off, erosion control, and utility
plans for review by the City Engineer.
3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall notify the City and
Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading.
I. Concurrent with building construction, construct a 5-foot wide concrete
sidewalk along the south side of Prairie Center Drive from U.S. #169 to
Joiner Way.
5. Receive approval from the Board of Appeals for variances as necessary for
off-site parking, common driveway, parking, and accessory structure setback.
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
• FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
August 19, 1988
Marcus Development
East of Highway #169, west of Joiner Way, south of Prairie Center
Drive.
APPLICANT: Marcus Corporation
FEE OWNER: DYS Properties
REQUEST: 1. 7oning District Change from Rural to C-Regional Service on
0.65 acres, with variances.
2. Preliminary Plat of 1.61 acres into 2 lots and 1 outlot.
-2
Background
The Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide
Plan depicts this site as guided for
Regional Commercial land uses.
Surrounding areas to the north,
south, east, and west, are also
guided for Regional Commercial land
uses. Specific land uses, all zoned
C-Regional Service, include
Youngstedt's Service Center to the
north; Rocky Rococo to the south;
the proposed Lariat Center to the
east; and, U.S. 0169 to the west.
This parcel of land is part of the
Preserve Commercial Park South PUD.
The PUD originally depicted only two
buildings along the west side of
Joiner Way. In a Staff Report,
dated November 23, 1984, reviewing
Youngstedt's Service Center and
Rocky Rococo Pizza, a future land
use for this parcel was discussed.
Based upon a maximum B.A.R. (Base
Area Ratio) of 20%, this site could
contain up to a 5,700 square foot
Marcus Development 2 August 19, 1988
office building. However, because of site size, and configuration, it was expected
that a smaller building would be developed due to setbacks and parking requirements.
The proponents are currently requesting a Zoning District Change and Preliminary
Platting to allow for the construction of a 4,138 square foot credit union and photo
processing center.
Site Plan/Preliminary Plat
The preliminary plat depicts the division of a 1.46-acre tract into 2 lots. Lot 1,
the location of Youngstedt's Service Center, contains 35,024 square feet, while Lot
2 would contain 28,840 square feet. The current proposal is for a 4,138 square foot
credit union and photo processing center. A B.A.R. of 14.5% has been calculated and
the building meets the minimum required setbacks of the C-Regional Service Zoning
District.
Based upon a parking requirement of 6 spaces per 1,000 square feet for the credit
union (2,950 square feet), and 8 spaces per 1,000 square feet for the photo
processing center (1,188 square feet), a total of 28 parking spaces are required.
The site plan depicts 20 parking stalls. As proposed, one of the spaces adjacent
U.S. #169 does not meet the dimensional requirements and another space blocks the
trash enclosure. Staff recommends that either the trash enclosure be relocated or
the parking stall removed. If this were to occur, only 18 parking spaces would be
provided. In addressing the variance, the proponent has indicated that the photo
processing center is a drive-up facility and would initially include only 3
employees, while the credit union will initially have 4 employees. This would leave
11 parking spaces for credit union customers. If the building use were to change, a
total of 21 parking spaces would be required for office and 33 spaces for retail.
Any future land use would be restricted by parking constraints.
Occasionally, parking for the Youngstedt's Service Center has been observed on this
site which raises the question as to whether or not there are enough parking spaces
provided to service their facility. If a parking shortage does occur and this site
is developed as proposed, room for additional parking spaces would not be available.
Access into the project would be from Joiner Way by the use of a one-way drive aisle
which would circulate around the building. Two drive-up windows are proposed for
the credit union and one drive-up window proposed for the photo processing center.
According to the BRW report, stacking distance for the credit union should not be a
problem (see attached memo). However, potential tenant problems may occur due to
the fact that there is only enough distance for approximately 2 cars to queue at the
photo processing center before a car would block the credit union drive-up. This
would occur to the rear of the building and would not affect traffic on Joiner Way.
Traffic
The 1985 MCA traffic study, conducted by BRW, estimated 177 daily trips for this
site and 15 trips in the p.m. peak hour. BRW has estimated that the current
proposal would generate a daily trip rate of 392 trips and a p.m. peak of 31 trips.
Because the p.m. peak hour trip generation exceeds the estimate, Staff has requested
that the proponent provide information in support of the proposal. In reviewing the
information provided, which includes hours of operation from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., the
likely p.m. peak hour trip generation from the credit union would include only
lin()
Marcus Development 3 August 19, 1988
employee trips. If 4 employees exist initially and with a calculat
e
d
p
.
m
.
p
e
a
k
generation of 3 trips for the photo processing center, a total of app
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
7
trips should occur within the p.m. peak hour. This is 8 trips less t
h
a
n
t
h
e
p
.
m
.
peak hour allocation. If the land use or the hours of operation shoul
d
c
h
a
n
g
e
,
t
h
e
p.m. peak hour may possibly exceed the allocation. Because of this, Sta
f
f
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
that the proponent agree to limit the hours of operation from 9 a.m. to
5
p
.
m
.
u
n
t
i
l
it can be proven that the p.m. peak hour trip generation from this bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
w
o
u
l
d
not exceed 15 trips.
In support of the proposal, consideration should be given to the followi
n
g
:
1. A credit union is a use that is contemplated in the Major Center Area.
2. The Floor Area Ratio, based upon 4,138 square feet of building, on
0
.
6
5
acres, is 14.5%. The maximum Floor Area Ratio allowed in the C-Reg
i
o
n
a
l
Service zoning district is 40%.
3. Based upon the previous traffic analysis by Staff, current p.m. peak
t
r
i
p
generation should not exceed the allocation.
4. Future land uses such as office or retail, which could occupy this build
i
n
g
,
would not generate a p.m. peak hour trip rate which would exceed
t
h
e
allocation.
Grading/Utilities
The proposed site is relatively flat having been previously graded wit
h
t
h
e
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
developments. Minimal grading is to occur in order to allow for the co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
the building pad and parking lot. There is a 6-foot berm adjacent
U
.
S
.
#
1
6
9
t
o
provide screening to the parking areas with minimal berming occuring ad
j
a
c
e
n
t
J
o
i
n
e
r
Way.
Water and sanitary sewer service is available to this site through con
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
m
a
d
e
to an 8-inch water and 8-inch sanitary sewer line located within Joine
r
W
a
y
.
T
h
e
r
e
is a 78-inch storm sewer adjacent U.S. #169 which provides a connec
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
catch basin system. Other utilities on this project site include a 12-
i
n
c
h
s
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
sewer line located adjacent the southern property line and a Northern
S
t
a
t
e
s
P
o
w
e
r
easement which is located over the western portion of the site. Nor
t
h
e
r
n
S
t
a
t
e
s
Power has submitted a letter which indicates that the proposed
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
i
s
acceptable (see attached letter).
Landscaping
Based upon a building size of 4,138 square feet, a total of 13 calip
e
r
i
n
c
h
e
s
o
f
plant material is required per City Code. The landscape plan depicts a total of 43
caliper inches. Because there is a 171/2-foot setback adjacent Joine
r
W
a
y
,
S
t
a
f
f
would recommend that screening of the parking areas be accomplished thr
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
u
s
e
of shrubbery and deciduous trees as per the Lariat Center landscap
e
p
l
a
n
(
s
e
e
Attachment A). An irrigation system shall be installed to ensure plant
s
u
r
v
i
v
a
l
.
Architecture
The proposed building is a single structure with 2 tenants, each with
a
d
r
i
v
e
-
u
p
window. Exterior building materials include 75.3% facebrick, glass,
o
r
b
e
t
t
e
r
a
n
d
'il(t)
Marcus Development 4 August 19, 1988
24% decorative concrete block. In order to develop an overall architectural
consistency for buildings within this area, the architect should incorporate similar
building materials and colors as the adjacent buildings including Youngstedt's
Service Center, Rocky Rococo, and the Lariat Center. Exterior building material
samples and colors are subject to review prior to building permit issuance.
Signage/Lighting
A pylon sign is proposed at the entrance of the site. The sign shall conform to
City Code with details reviewed prior to building permit issuance. Exterior
lighting shall include security lights mounted directly to the building and parking
lot lights located at each parking area. Pole lighting should be 20-foot downcast
luminars.
Pedestrian Systems
There is an existing 5-foot concrete sidewalk located along the west side of Joiner
Way. In order to complete the overall pedestrian system in this area, a 5-foot wide
concrete sidewalk shall be constructed on the south side of Prairie Center Drive
from U.S. #169 to Joiner Way.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
If the Planning Commission feels that the land use proposed is in an appropriate
location and feel comfortable with the traffic information submitted by the
proponent, Staff would recommend approval from Marcus Development Corporation for a
Zoning District Change from Rural to C-Regional Service on 0.65 acres, with
variances, and the Preliminary Plat of 1.61 acres into 2 lots and 1 outlot, subject
to plans dated August 5, 1988, subject to the Staff Report dated August 19, 1988,
subject to the following recommendations:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Revise the landscape plan to include a combination of deciduous
trees and shrubbery material along Joiner Way to help screen the
parking areas.
B. Provide samples and compatible colors of exterior building
materials.
C. Provide a letter of understanding that the credit union will limit
the hours of operation from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. in order to meet the
traffic allocations.
2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off, erosion control plans, and
utility plans for review by the City Engineer.
"'316d.
Marcus Development 5 August 19, 1988
3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent sha
l
l
:
A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
B. Notify the City and Watershed District at leas
t
4
8
h
o
u
r
i
n
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
of grading.
4. Concurrent with building construction, constr
u
c
t
a
5
-
f
o
o
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
sidewalk along the south side of Prairie Ce
n
t
e
r
D
r
i
v
e
f
r
o
m
U
.
S
.
0
1
6
9
t
o
Joiner Way.
5. Receive approval from the Board of Appeals f
o
r
v
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
s
a
s
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
f
o
r
the number of parking stalls.
If the Planning Commission feels that either th
e
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
i
s
i
n
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
o
r
t
h
a
t
the estimated trip generation is not consiste
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
1
9
8
5
B
R
W
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
t
u
d
y
,
then the appropriate action would be to close t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
a
n
d
e
i
t
h
e
r
r
e
t
u
r
n
the plans to the proponent for revisions or deni
a
l
.
3)63
DECEMBER 20,1988
47565 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION SERVICE
4 7566 SUN ELECTRIC CORPORATION ENGINE ANALIZER REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAW
'567 THREE M REFLECTIVE TAPE-FIRE DEPT
47568 VOID OUT CHECK
47569 EAGLE WINE CO WINE
47570 ISFSI CONFERENCE-FIRE DEPT
47571 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR
47572 GUARANTEE MUTUAL LIFE COMPANY DECEMBER 88 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM
47573 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR WINE
47574 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY SCHOOL-WATER DEPT
47575 MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE DECEMBER 88 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM
47576 PAUSTIS & SONS CO WINE
47577 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO WINE
47578 PRIOR WINE CO WINE
47579 QUALITY WINE CO LIQUOR
47580 SUPPLIES 7 HI ENTER INC DECEMBER 88 RENT-LIQUOR STORE
47581 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT
47582 VOID OUT CHECK
47583 HENNEPIN CTY REGISTRAR OF TITLES COPY FEE-HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM
47584 SOUTH HENNEPIN VOTECH HOLIDAY DINNER-SENIOR CENTER/FEES PAID
47585 MINNESASCO SERVICE
47586 POSTMASTER 1989 MAILING FEES-CITY HALL
47587 LANE INSURANCE INC INSURANCE CLAIM
47588 SILVER TOOL BOX LENS-POLICE DEPT
47589 CARGILL SALT DIVISION SALT-SNOW & ICE CONTROL
47590 KEROS CARTWRIGHT SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL
47591 E P PHOTO FILM/FILM PROCESSING-POLICE DEPT
7592 FAIRVIEW BLOOD TESTS-POLICE DEPT
/593 HORWITZ INC REFUND-PLUMBING PERMIT/MECHANICAL PERMIT
47594 KENNEL-AIRE INC -SQUAD CAR SCREEN/EXTENSION PANEL-POLICE
DEPT
47595 MARY KOTTKE VOLLEYBALL I. BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
47596 WESTBuRNE SUPPLY INC. WATER COOLER CARTRIDGES-COMMUNITY CENTER
47597 AT&T SERVICE
47596 AT&T SERVICE
47599 NSP SERVICE
47600 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE
47601 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-CITY HALL
47602 ADELINE BRAMWELL ELECTION JUDGE WAGES
47603 PETTY CASH EXPENSES-CITY HALL
47604 ANDREW FYTEN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
47605 PADGETT THOMPSON CONFERENCE-PARKS DEPT
47606 BEER WHOLESALERS INC BEER
47607 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIX
47608 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO BEER
47609 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER
47610 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO BEER
47611 MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER
47612 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MIX
47613 RC BEVERAGE-TWIN CITIES MIX
47614 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER
47615 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE MIX
4 7616 MAX JOHNSON TRUCKING -SERVICE-1988 LIME SLUDGE REMOVAL &
DISPOSAL
41617 NODLAND CONSTRUCTION CO -SERVICE-HIDDEN GLEN 3RD ADDITION/WYNDHAM
CREST
23275609
600.00
98.00
114.60
0.00
166.74
190.00
5710.43
2359.08
11357.91
60.00
2307.09
153.80
5502.10
1342.42
9743.15
4494.08
115.00
0.00
3.00
667.12
2694.39
120.00
1091.93
29.00
7653.92
1375.00
39.41
45.76
18.00
134.85
72.00
20.04
532.21
3.18
1040.27
596.00
5000.00
19.50
61.97
19.00
99.00
3684.30
893.20
6599.60
12743.86
114.95
17858.54
740.20
185.70
22655.80
14.70
83896.87
17518.42
3164
47618 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO SERVICE-FRANLO ROAD IMPROVEMENT
47619 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO -SERVICE-MITCHELL/RESEARCH ROAD & WEST
-76TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS/GOLDEN TRIANGLE
DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
620 A TO 1 RENTAL CENTER STEPLADDER RENTAL-CITY HALL
47621 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY MALL/SENIOR CENTER
47622 AERIAL PAINTING INC -PAINTING-4 MAST ARMS-$820.0012 POLES-
-5110.00/19 SIGNAL LAMPS-$380.00/2 POLES/
COMTROLLER/16 GROUND POSTS-TRAFFIC CONTROL
47623 AIR COMPRESSOR EQUIPMENT CO INC -AIR SYSTEM REPAIR/INSTALL AUTODRAIN &
BALL VALVES-PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING
47624 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO -AIR FRESHENER SERVICE-CITY HALL/UNIFORMS-
-WATER DEPT/STREET DEPT/SEWER DEPT/PARK
MAINT/COMMUNITY CENTER/TOWELS-LIQUOR STORE
47625 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC BOOKS/JOURNAL BINDERS-WATER DEPT
47626 MARY BOTTOLENE AMIOT -PRINTING-FLYERS-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL
COMMISSION
47627 ANCHOR PRINTING COMPANY BUSINESS CARDS-LIQUOR STORE
47628 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC SIGNS/BRACKET PARTS-TRAFFIC CONTROL
47629 ANDERSON'S GARDEN EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
47630 AOK RENTAL CENTER TRUCK RENTAL-ELECTIONS
47631 ASCE DUES-ENGINEERING DEPT
47632 ASTLEFORD INTL INC -WIPER MOTOR/MOTOR/SWITCHES/CABLES/KNOB-
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
47633 B A W INC SERVICE-TRAFFIC STUDY
47634 BACHMAN'S EXPENSES-CITY HALL
47635 BACON'S ELECTRIC CO -SULFAlE FEEDER t EXTERIOR LIGHT REPAIR-
WATER DEPT
47636 BARRETT MOVING & STORAGE COMPANY HAND CART-ELECTIONS
'637 BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES INC -SERVICE-EDEN PRAIRIE COMPREHENSIVE PARK
& RECREATION PLAN
47638 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC -BLADES/WINDSHIELD WASHER FLUID/SNOWBRUSH/
-SPARK PLUGS/BATTERIES/SIGNAL LAMPS/BULBS-
EPUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
47639 BAUER BUILT TIRE & SVC FRONT END ALIGNMENTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
47640 BALLOONS 'W STUFF OF MPLS INC HELIUM TANKS-FIRE DEPT
47641 BENTEC ENGINEERING CORPORATION LIFT STATION REPAIRS-SEWER DEPT
47642 BERGIN AUTO BODY -REPAIR & REFINISH POLICE VAN-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
47643 BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY -FILM/FILM PROCESSING-WATER DEPT/PLANNING
-DEPT/FORESTRY DEPT/POLICE DEPT/FIRE DEPT
ENGINEERING DEPT
47644 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON OCTOBER 88 ANIMAL IMPOUND SERVICE
47645 BLOOMINGTON LOCK & SAFE CO KNOB LOCK INSTALLED-CITY HALL
47646 LOIS BOETTCHER -MINUTES-PARKS RECREATION & NATURAL
RESOURCES COMMISSION
47647 LEE BRANDT HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
47648 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC -GRAVEL-STREET MAINT/SNOW & ICE CONTROL/
PARK MAINTENANCE
47649 NATE BUCK VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
47650 BUSINESS CREDIT LEASING INC JANUARY 89 COPIER RENTAL-FIRE DEPT
47651 CARGILL SALT DIVISION SALT-SNOW & ICE CONTROL
47652 CARNEY OFFICE FURNITURE DESK-POLICE FORFEITURE-DRUGS
47653 CNCA BOOK-AQUATICS SUPERVISIOR
1697.83
251013.46
14.84
265.93
1682.00
249.33
1549.00
138.00
30.00
39.54
485.45
58.00
149.48
105.00
231.31
2164.20
43.75
546.92
21.00
26056.49
371.02
166.00
109.00
583.00
1060.00
631.44
512.50
150.00
80.60
149.00
1210.11
162.00
182.75
1960.12
320.00
37.50
?422657
DECEMBER 20,1988
4 7654 JOHN CONLEY EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
7655 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC CURB & GUTTERS-STREET MAINTENANCE
47656 CONTACT MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INC -RADIO REPAIR/PAGER REPAIR-POLICE DEPT/
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
47657 CONTECH CONST PRODUCTS INC CULVERT END GUARD-DRAINAGE CONTROL
47658 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT
47659 DALCO -CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT/FIRE DEPT/
POLICE BUILDING
47660 OEM CON LANDFILL INC -NOVEMBER 88 WASTE DISPOSAL-STREET MAINT/
PARK MAINTENANCE
47661 DIAMOND ACCEPTANCE -JANUARY 89 COPIER INSTALLMENT PAYMENT-
POLICE DEPT
47662 n(nn VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
47663 IL1111 SOD-ANDERSON LAKES PKWY/ROUND LAKE PARK
47664 11n 11n1n 11 11n 1111 EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
47665 11n 11 1111 AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
47666 1111 FILM/FILM PROCESSING-FIRE DEPT
47667 11n 11n 1( FILM PROCESSING-POLICE DEPT
47668 nnn 11 n ••nn, SERVICE-FINANCE DEPT
47669"n•• 11n 11 n141111 -OIL SEALS/BELTS/U JOINTS/SHOCKS/FITTINGS/
-BEARINGS/CABLE TIES/LICENSE LAMP/BLOWER
-MOTORS/SIGNAL LAMPS/PLUG ADAPTER/MIRROR
-HEAD/HUB CAPS/ROTORS/SWITCHES-WATER DEPT/
FIRE DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
47670 FIREHOUSE LAWYER MONTHLY NEWLSETT SUBSCRIPTION-FIRE DEPT
47671 FLAGHOUSE -WATER COOLERS/FLOOR HOCKEY SETS-AFTERNOON
ADVENTURE
.7672 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
47673 G & K SERVICES -COVERALLS/TOWELS-WATER DEPT/PARK MAINT/
LIQUOR STORE
47674 1111..ft 1110 n 11n ll 11.1,n TIRE REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
47675 (VII SIGN POSTS-WATER DEPT
47676 nn Af nnn fT -TERMOMETER GAUGE/DRUM CRADLE/AIR SPRAYER-
POLICE BUILDING
15.00
248.00
326.75
70.00
1636.88
326.76
151.00
300.00
101.75
2031.25
716.17
175.00
15.55
8.04
130.00
1202.58
89.52
286.66
59.66
426.88
399.44
749.00
145.15
47677 ALAN GRAY
47678 GROSS OFFICE SUPPLY
47679 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC
47680 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
47681 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
47682 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
47683 D C HEY COMPANY INC
47684 HONEYWELL PROTECTION SERVICES
47685 IBM CORPORATION
47686 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL 81ST 4272
47687 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL GIST 4272
47608 INTERNATIONAL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC
7689 INTERSTATE DIESEL PRODUCTS INC
690 ISS INTER SERVICE SYSTEM
47691 J A HANDY-CRAFTS INC
47692 CARL JULLIE
NOVEMBER 88 EXPENSES-ENGINEERING DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
-FUSE-PARK MAINT/LIGHTING CONTRACTOR-
-1157.84/DRAINAGE CONTROL/WIRING OF FIRE
STATION 43 & 44-134.00-FIRE DEPT
FILING FEE-PLANNING DEPT
PRINTING-ELECTION BALLOTS
OCTOBER 88 BOARD OF PRISIONERS
-NOVEMBER 88 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-FIRE
DEPT
-1ST QUARTER 89 SECURITY SYSTEM-SENIOR
CENTER
JANUARY 89 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL
OVERPAYMENT-UTILITY BILLING
EXPENSES-ELECTIONS
-NOVEMBER 88 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/TONER-
POLICE DEPT
GENERATOR REPAIR-POLICE BUILDING
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
CRAFT SUPPLIES-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND
EXPENSES/DUES-ADMINISTRATION
245.00
748.60
3572.55
502.00
1003.46
468.12
30.00
75.00
424.32
3200.40
425.35
304.20
208.00
274.22
152.73
157.43
2140242
3/64e
DECEMBER 20,1988
'7 693 .IM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC
694 JUSTUS LUMBER CO
47695 VOID OUT CHECK
47696 KOKESH ATHLETIC SUPPLIES INC
47697 MARY KOTTKE
47698 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER
47699 BOB LAMBERT
47700 CYNTHIA J LANENBERG
47701 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD
47703 LYMAN LUMBER CO
47704 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC
47705 MCNEILUS STEEL INC
47706 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO
47707 MENARDS
47708 METRO PRINTING INC
47709 METROTECH
47710 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
711 MINNEAPOLIS HEALTH DEPARTMENT
.712 MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT
47713 MINNESOTA COMMUNICATIONS CORP
47714 MN SUBURBAN PUBLICATIONS
47715 MSSA
47716 CITY OF MINNETONKA
47717 MINUTEMAN PRESS
47718 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT
47719 MOTOROLA INC
47720 GREGORY J MUELLER
47721 MUNIC1LITE CO
47722 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE
47723 NATIONAL CITY BANK OF MPLS
47724 NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA CENTER
47725 BETH NILSSON
47726 NORTH STAR SOUND INC
47727 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
47728 NORWEST BANK MPLS NA
'729 ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY INC
47730 PEDERSON SELLS EQUIP CO INC
47731 PEPSI COLA COMPANY
OFFICE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT/WATER DEPT
-POST ANCHORS/DOOR/TIMBER/PANELS/DOWELS/
-STYROFOAM/TREATED LUMBER/STUDS-PARK MAINT/
SENIOR CENTER/POLICE DEPT
TABLE TENNIS BALLS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS
VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-MIRROR/NUTS/BOLTS/RODS/TURNBUCKLES/SCREWS/
-SPONGES/HANDLE EXTENSION/TAPE/FUNNEL/
-DRILL BITS/LUBRICANT/SUMP PUMP/STRAP/
-PULLEYS/SNAPS/ROLLER/GLUE/BATTERIES/
-PROPANE/HANGERS/WIRE-SEWER DEPT/WATER
DEPT/STREET MAINT
DUES-PARKS & RECREATION DEPT
MILEAGE-FIRE DEPT
-AUGUST 88 LEGAL SERVICE/AUGUST 88 CABLE
TV/AUGUST 88 COMMUNITY CENTER LITIGATION
TREATED TIMBERS-PARK MAINTENANCE
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT/CITY HALL
TUBING/STEEL PLATE-PURGATORY CREEK TRAILS
OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT
WIND TURBINES/ICE MELT-PARK MAINTENANCE
PRINTING-ENVELOPES/FORMS-POLICE DEPT
PIPE LOCATOR-WATER DEPT
BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE
SEPTEMBER 88 LABORATORY TESTS-POLICE DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES-ENGINEERING DEPT
-DECEMBER 88 PAGER SERVICE-SEWER DEPT/
WATER DEPT/POLICE DEPT/FIRE DEPT
ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES
DUES-STREET DEPT
-1988 & 1989 DUES-I 494 JOINT POWERS
AGREEMENT
-PRINTING-CALENDAR/REGISTRATION FORMS-
SPECIAL EVENTS
-2 FIVE ROW BLEACHERS-$1286.00/4 HANDRAIL
SYSTEMS-$892.00-ROUND LAKE PARK
-3 PORTABLE RADIOS-$2493.00/15 CASES-
-$840.00/5 BATTERIES-$442.50-POLICE
FORFEITURE-DRUGS
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-MOUNTING BRACKETS/SPOTLIGHTS/HANDLE
ASSEMBLY-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/WATER DEPT
FILM-ASSESSING DEPT
BOND PAYMENT
ZIP CODE BOOKS-CITY HALL
SWING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
SPEAKER/CABLE-CITY HALL
SERVICE-STREET LIGHT-TEALWOOD COURT
BOND PAYMENT
-OCTOBER/NOVEMBER & DECEMBER 88 SERVICE-
FIRE DEPT
HYDRAULIC CONTROL VALVE-EQUIPMENT MAINT
CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-ROUND LAKE PARK
242.59
272.68
0.00
11.98
90.00
368.18
111.50
50.75
20951.73
10.00
99.60
240.12
461.03
54.00
139.89
188.00
26.86
37.88
66.20
46.83
210.50
136.80
20.00
7155.00
315.10
2178.00
3775.50
54.00
161.60
290.94
125742.60
33.45
426.40
196.80
350.00
713125.16
467.12
110.51
136.00
47702 LEFEVERE LEFLER KENNEDY OBRIEN DR OCTOBER 88 LEGAL SERVICE
87835530
DECEMBER 20,1988
'732 PASSON'S SPORTS -CAGEBALLS/WHISTLES/GAME CONES/HOOPS/
-BATTING TEES/GAMES/JUMP ROPES/PLAYGROUND
BALLS-AFTERNOON ADVENTURE
47733 JENNIFER PAYNE MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER
47734 CONNIE L PETERS MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER
47735 PLYMOUTH PLUMBING REFUND-PLUMBING PERMIT
47736 POWER BRAKE EQUIPMENT CO -BATTERIES/DUST COVER/STROBE LIGHTS/LENS/
ANTI-FREEZE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
47737 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC -FURNISH & INSTALL 7 UNDERCABINET LIGHTS
-IN STUDY STATIONS/2 RECEPTACLES-POLICE
BUILDING
47738 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN -TIRE TUBES/FILTER/SCREW/BLADE SHARPENING-
-FIRE DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/
COMMUNITY CENTER
47739 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC -TRANSCRIBER-$599.00/DICTAPHONE-$349.00/
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-WATER DEPT
47740 PHM COMMUNITY SERVICES SENIOR PROGRAMS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
47741 PRIOR LAKE AGGREGATE INC SAND-SNOW & ICE CONTROL
47742 PROTECTIVE SURFACING INC -SEALING FLOOR OF REMODELED FIRE STATION
#3
47743 PSQ BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS INC -DECEMBER 88/JANUARY & FEBRUARY 89
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL
47744 R G HODEEN INC PAINTING CENTRAL FIRE STATION
47745 REVERE PAINT-WATER DEPT
47746 RIDGE DOOR SALES & SERVICE INC INSTALL DOOR SPRINGS-FIRE DEPT
47747 ROAD RESCUE INC FIRST AID SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT
748 PHILIP ROSE BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
,749 S & S ARTS & CRAFTS CRAFT SUPPLIES-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND
47750 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO -OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/COMMUNITY
CENTER/RECREATION DEPT
47751 ST PAUL RESTAURANT & EQUIPMENT TOWELS-FIRE DEPT
47752 SANCO INC ICE MELT-POLICE BUILDING
47753 THE SANDWICH FACTORY INC EXPENSES-COUNCIL
47754 SAVOIE SUPPLY CO INC DEGREASER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
47755 MARK SCHMIDT TENNNIS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
47756 SCHMIDT READY MIX INC CEMENT-STREET MAINTENANCE
47757 THOMAS SCHMITZ FIRE CALLS
47758 ANTHONY SECINARO FIRE CALLS
47759 SETON NAME PLATE CORPORATION EMERGENCY DIAL 911 SIGNS-FIRE DEPT
47760 SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM INC -SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER LITIGATION/
COMMUNITY CENTER REPAIR
47761 SHAKOPEE FORD INC -VALVE ASSEMBLY/CONTROL/CORE/REMOVE &
-REPLACE CARBURETOR/ENGINE REPAIR-
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
47762 SKARNES INC PARTITIONS & INSTALLATION-FIRE DEPT
47763 W E SLATE CO MARKER BOARDS-POLICE DEPT
47764 W GORDON SMITH CO GAS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/PARK MAINTENANCE
47765 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP -WRENCHES/SOCKET SET/PLIERS-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
47766 SNITZ MANUFACTURING COMPANY -BEAN BAGS/GOALS/BALL BAGS-AFTERNOON
PLAYGROUND
767 SOUTHWEST AUTO SUPPLY INC -PAINT/FILTERS/IGNITION/HOSE/TEMPERATURE
-CONTROLS/CALIPER CONES/BRAKE SHOES/BRAKE
-PADS/BRAKES/IGNITION SWITCHES/GASKETS/
-GAUGE/LIGHTS/SPARK PLUGS/TAPE-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
592.00
89.75
20.75
20.50
483.79
675.00
29.45
1078.00
50.00
1277.72
4361.00
1465.50
920.00
64.51
252.00
68.58
174.00
23.72
134.73
51.90
55.60
74.78
408.75
93.00
77.15
9.00
9.00
62.54
4744.36
644.59
919.00
505.00
49.93
123.30
110.58
1270.03
2098950
%11
47768 ANGELA SOCHER MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 45.25
47769 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC -ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES/HISTORICAL & 1023.12
CULTURAL COMMISSION
7770 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ UNIFORMS/HELMET BAG/HELMET-POLICE DEPT 232.00
47771 SULLIVANS SERVICES INC SERVICE-OUTDOOR CENTER-STARING LAKE PARK 111.00
47772 SUPPLEE ENTERPRISES INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 18.00
47773 SUPREME SALES COMPANY INC -TOWELS/MATTRESS COVERS/PILLOW CASES- 73.02
POLICE BUILDING
47774 TARGET STORES TOYS-CENTER CARE-COMMUNITY CENTER 103.70
47775 TJ'S OF EDEN PRAIRIE EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 9.12
47776 DOUGLAS THIES FIRE CALLS 9.00
47777 SELECT SERVICE & SUPPLY CO INC 6 GOALS & NETS-AFTERNOON ADVENTURE 151.47
47778 VALARIE TRADER AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 175.00
47779 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN/CLEANING SUPPLIES-EQUIPMENT MAINT 18.14
47780 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED -UNIFORMS/ANIMAL TRAP/BINOCULARS-POLICE 2040.15
DEPT
47781 UNITED FIREFIGHTERS ASSN DUES-FIRE DEPT 25.00
47782 UNITED LABORATORIES INC ICE MELTER PELLETS-WATER DEPT 108.86
47783 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC NUTS/WASHERS-PARK MAINTENANCE 110.43
47784 KEITH WALL EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 16.67
47785 THE WALL STREET JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION-FINANCE DEPT 119.00 47786 WATER PRODUCTS CO PIPE/COUPLINGS-WATER DEPT 240.14
47787 TINA WEISER EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 26.00
47788 WEST WELD -NOZZLES/WELDING GLOVES/WELDING ELECTRODE/ 196.41
DIFFUSER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
47789 WILSON TANNER GRAPHICS -BUSINESS CARDS-ASSESSING DEPT/OUTDOOR 60.00
CENTER
47790 KEN WORDE HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 126.00
791 WORKER'S COMPENSATION LAW BULLET! SUBSCRIPTION-FIRE DEPT 48.99
.7792 YOUNGSTEDTS INC TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE -.; 456.31
47793 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE -FIRST AID SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/PARK MAINT/ 131.50
PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING
47794 ZIEGLER INC -DUMP TRUCK SNOW PLOW BLADES-EQUIPMENT 1748.10
MAINTENANCE
47795 KAY ZUCCARO AQUA AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 75.00
47083 VOID OUT CHECK 8.00-
47325 VOID OUT CHECK 7854.64-
47414 VOID OUT CHECK 10.50-
47429 VOID OUT CHECK 30.00-
47426 VOID OUT CHECK 133.35-
-53911 $1447190.77
DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS
le GENERAL 214436.64
11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT 506.50
15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M 58874.70
17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE 45880.29
20 CEMETERY OPERATIONS 966.25
21 POLICE DRUG FORFEITURE 4095.50
22 STATE AID CONST 3664.00
31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP 34654.88
33 UTILITY BOND FUND 63355.70
44 UTILITY DEBT FUND 161286.42
51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 207640.48
52 IMPROVEMENT DEBT FUND 551838.74
57 ROAD IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 2164.20
73 WATER FUND
77 SEWER FUND
81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND
87 CDBG FUND
$1447190.77
96612.73
832.53
263.21
118.00
5)64
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-299
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ON THE
NOVEMBER, 1988 FLYING CLOUD MASTER PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Master Plan Report, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed comments and input from
City advisory commissions, City Staff, residents, and interested individuals.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Eden Prairie City Council finds the
report's preferred alternative of extending the southerly east/west runway to 5,000
feet incompatible with Eden Prairie's Comprehensive Guide Plan for the following
reasons:
1. The runway expansion and extended Safety Zone A will remove 100+
acres planned for residential and park use from the City's Guide
Plan.
2. The associated extended Safety Zones A and B will prohibit and
restrict residential development respectively.
3. The adjacent landfill and U.S. Fish and Wildlife area are identified
incompatible uses with an airport and thereby incompatible with
expansion.
4. Aircraft flight patterns will be extended out and lowered which will
impact neighborhoods presently receiving minimal aircraft noise.
This will have a significant impact on the future residential
planned for southwestern Eden Prairie.
5. An extended runway will attract additional jet traffic to Flying
Cloud which predominately serves single engine aircraft. Mixing
slow moving aircraft with fast traveling aircraft can cause ground
and air confusion and congestion.
6. The expansion appears to have minimal benefit to the metropolitan
area.
7. It has not been demonstrated that future jet aircraft cannot be
accommodated at St. Paul Downtown and other MAC airports.
8. The "spike" noise (90-100+dcb), associated with jet aircraft, is not
compatible with Eden Prairie's existing and planned residential uses
around the airport.
9. Based upon the 1986 Metropolitan Council's Aviation Plan, Flying
Cloud can meet its operational demands up to the year 2003.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Eden Prairie City Council has the following
response to additional hangar space at the south side of the airport:
A. Old hangars and hangar rows should be considered for rehabilitation
or raising and new hangars erected. This could delay the need for
expensive land acquisition and site preparation for a new hangar
area.
B. If new hangars are constructed along the south side of the airport,
a screening plan should be implemented which will interrupt the view
of the airport from the Wildlife Refuge and any future adjacent
residential uses.
ADOPTED by the City Council on the day of
, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
Cuningham
;..tArchiteets,
;,1,11.1:11:100141,4 1 '.V3titkil
7.7210 N. Second Screei .'1 :,.:Minneapolis, MN 55401 ;
N6I2 r332 0224' I:1MM
;*".1m ,:fri
November 22, 1988
Don Uram
Eden Prairie Planning Department
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Don,
Please find enclosed the photos and copies I promised
y
o
u
.
Y
o
u
w
i
l
l
n
o
t
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
south and west additions make up Phase I. They include the following:
First Floor South:
New administrative offices, Guidance and Career Cente
r
,
n
u
r
s
e
s
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
a
n
d
f
a
c
u
l
t
y
lounge, accessible from the visitor parking lot.
First Floor West:
New art rooms, life management labs, department off
i
c
e
s
,
a
n
d
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
a
r
e
a
s
.
L
i
f
e
management areas are near the school kitchen and clo
s
e
t
o
t
h
e
o
u
t
s
i
d
e
d
e
l
i
v
e
r
y
d
o
o
r
s
.
The art classrooms have direct access to the outside fo
r
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
l
i
g
h
t
a
n
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
art.
Second Floor South:
New English and social studies classrooms and depart
m
e
n
t
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
a
r
e
a
,
n
e
a
r
t
h
e
Media Center and central to the building.
Second Floor West:
New business education labs and classrooms, new depa
r
t
m
e
n
t
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
a
r
e
a
s
a
r
e
shared with the industrial technology department.
Third Floor South:
New math classrooms and department resource area.
Third Floor West:
New chemistry and physics labs and storage areas.
17nmscritTriml
John W.Cuningharn.AIA :
1.31SitittlfrillIkVtiti/4 1113 )ohn Quirer, A1A
dJohn
:131,101M111111UF.41:3Mi
Hamilton:AIA
tiat4110421201413WOIZEI
titit1241Eiltiellitqad 310
The first phase will be released for bidding on January 20, 1989 wit
h
o
c
c
u
p
a
n
c
y
expected in September 1990.
Phase II construction includes all of the interior life safety remodel
i
n
g
,
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
the Media Center and the addition of a new gym, new physical educ
a
t
i
o
n
m
u
l
t
i
-
purpose activity room, new rehearsal hall and a new scene shop for
t
h
e
a
u
d
i
t
o
r
i
u
m
.
This phase will be bid in April of 1989 with occupancy expected in S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
o
f
1
9
9
0
.
The building exterior will be both matching and contrasting brick
w
i
t
h
s
o
m
e
a
r
e
a
s
o
f
glass and aluminum curtain wall. The intent of the design is to mak
e
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
s
open and welcoming as possible from both the north and the south
e
n
t
r
i
e
s
.
My apologies for the delay in getting this to you. If you have any qu
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
,
p
l
e
a
s
e
d
o
not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
John Hamilton
Enc.
161
_ x- .s ...... \ \ N ... ----- ./..."',..(t. '''... N. ., , , , -1 % ; I' EDEN PRAIRIEPRAIRIE HIGH SCHOOL (1.0.1P41,00.1 ARC MT111-74. I'
_ PHASE 11 PHASE 1 PHASE I FIRST FLOOR FLAN • • . • . • ••• • • • EDEN PRAIRIE HIGH SCHOOL ammommucurrecrior.A. 112.110
= = SECOND FLOOR PLAN • EDEN PRAIRIE HIGH SCHOOL .•
PHASE I _ PHASE I EDEN PRAIRIE HIGH, sana 01111711101411 MICNITIXTIL THIRD FLOOR rtArr 4.1ni' - • . i. . •
L 71 34&P.,..f••• • , ., . ...... ..sarigEtik—listvp.iny,21:,:::lit: tr 1,1"'n*,...:--1-7.:-: i: ..... 43 4kk",i ,4,,, mei &sr ii, :::: - - ----'`--7-C: Li 1.'s...-1 "::' ;%111.411- :--: ---__.,. r-1 7. • 470— ...11 11434 1 rmr.411..4 ' no,re n - t . , .1 .t1:2--k- ' tril ill l'' alM4"t7L1 • ' 7.,, • Ao.r - ; ;., • - • ' • • .'.:!;•4•';',..'",V.•••.,•••••;:i4j;re'-'-.:,'•:.,,: •-• •••;5.-• • 17.,4:0„1.,..v,4,- , _••• ,„„,„,, • :A
4 nn
,
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
City Manager Carl J. Jullie
Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson
New Conditions for On-sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses
November 1, 1988
Minnesota law establishes the number of on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses a
community may issue by its population. Because their number is limited, these
licenses can be important tools for shaping what cities will become. Eden
Prairie has several licenses remaining. As there has been increasing interest
among businesses to be granted these licenses, it is timely to revisit this
issue and determine what changes, if any, should be made.
CURRENT STATUS OF LICENSING AUTHORITY:
Due to the 1985 federal cersus of the City, Eden Prairie is considered a city o
f
second class for purposes of on-sale licensing. In this classification, a city
may issue up to 18 licenses plus one for every 2500 residents over 45,000
population. (Assuming an ultimate population of 70,000, Eden Prairie would have
28 licenses available.) The City may choose to limit the number of licenses to
fewer than that authorized by statute, but may not issue more licenses without a
referendum to do so. The number of club, non-intoxicating, and wine licenses
are not limited by statute.
Licenses are issued to a particular person (or corporation or partnership) for a
particular location and are not transferable. License applicants are subject to
a thorough police background investigation. In Eden Prairie, licensees pay
$7,500 per year ($7,700 if they have Sunday sale) for the license.
Current licenses in Eden Prairie are held by:
Abby's,Great American Food
Ciatti's Italian Ristorante
Edenvale Golf Club
Greenstreets of Eden Prairie
Kabuki/Ernest T's Restaurant
Mexican Village Restaurant
Mirage Restaurant
Snax Bar & Grill
Stars Restaurant (Flagship Athletic Club)
Two other license applications have been submitted:
Applebees Neighborhood Grill and Bar
Marriott Courtyard Inn
CURRENT CONDITIONS OF LICENSE:
Chapter 4 of the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code covers the licensing and regulatio
n
of beer, wine, and liquor sales. Essentially, the following conditions must be
met in order for a license to be issued:
a) A restaurant shall have seating facilities for not less
than 150 guests. (Sec. 4.01, subd. 20)
cm cp
- 2 -
b) A hotel or motel shall have not less t
h
a
n
1
0
0
g
u
e
s
t
rooms, and if it has a dining room as
a
n
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
l
p
a
r
t
o
f
its establishment, seating for at leas
t
1
0
0
g
u
e
s
t
s
m
u
s
t
b
e
provided for food service. (Sec. 4.01
,
s
u
b
d
.
2
1
)
.
c) In a restaurant, or in that part of a h
o
t
e
l
w
h
e
r
e
t
h
e
r
e
is a restaurant, 50 percent or more o
f
t
h
e
g
r
o
s
s
r
e
c
e
i
p
t
s
shall be derived from the serving of
f
o
o
d
.
(
S
e
c
.
4
.
1
1
)
d) No license shall be granted for any b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
i
n
3
0
0
feet of a public elementary or second
a
r
y
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
,
or within 100 feet of any church struc
t
u
r
e
.
(
S
e
c
.
4
.
3
2
,
subd. 5)
e) On-sale licenses shall be granted only
t
o
b
o
n
a
f
i
d
e
c
l
u
b
s
,
exclusive liquor stores, drug stores,
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
motels or hotels. (Sec. 4.32, subd. 6
)
f) No more than one license (or having 5 percent or more
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
in a license) shall be held by any per
s
o
n
.
(
S
e
c
.
4
.
7
1
,
subd. 8)
g) No license shall be granted to a pers
o
n
o
f
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
a
b
l
e
character or business reputation (Sec
.
4
.
0
2
,
s
u
b
d
.
4
F
)
.
SURVEY OF OTHER COMMUNITIES:
As might be expected, each city will
h
a
v
e
s
o
m
e
w
h
a
t
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
t
o
b
e
m
e
t
before a license will be issued. One
o
f
t
h
e
m
a
j
o
r
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
w
h
i
c
h
can occur relates to the physical establishment
-
i
t
s
v
a
l
u
e
o
f
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
s
i
z
e
expressed in terms of seating or squa
r
e
f
o
o
t
a
g
e
.
F
o
r
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
s
o
f
s
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
other cities, staff focused on these
i
s
s
u
e
s
.
A
s
s
o
m
e
c
i
t
i
e
s
s
e
n
t
m
o
r
e
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
Information, this is reported below:
Valuation Space Food Sale City Requirement Requirement Requirement Other
Apple Valley No
Bloomington No
NR
NR
50 seats & 1200 SF; "principal part"
*
D
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
s
-
50 hotel rooms & of business at least 1000 ft 900 SF dining area
from school
parcel, 900 ft
from church
parcel
Eagan $200,000 40 seats;
for that 25 guest rooms
portion in
which liquor
can be
served
c3v11
60%+ *4 licenses
designated for
hotels (1
currently held)
*2 licenses
designated for
restaurants
having more than
$350,000 value
non-leasehold
Improvements
*These designa-
tions made by
ordinance
-3-
Minnetonka No
100 seats
50%+
Referendum
approved which
removed
statutory
limit on number
of on-sale
licenses
Plymouth $1.1 million 150 seats
(1987) adj.
annually on
a building
cost index
Richfield $600,000 4000 SF & 40
restaurant; seats; 100
$1,000,000 guest rooms &
hotel 30 seats
40%+
"principal part"
of restaurant
business or that
area of a hotel
which serves food
*Distance - 500
feet of school
or church
property; 750
feet of resi-
dentially zoned
or guided
property
St.louis
Park
No 30 seats;
30 guest rooms
No *Resolution
states favor-
able considera-
tion of location
*Distance - 300
feet from church
or school
*1977 Referendum
adced 6 licenses
($750,000 or 10,000 S.F.
(excl.land
($250,000 or 5,000 S.F.
(excl. land
"Class I"
restaurant
w/"Class I"
restaurant
former
restaurant )
standard in )
effect 1975 -)
1988
former hotel )
standard in )
effect 1975 -)
1988
Eden Prairie No
150 seats;
50%+
*Distance - 300
100 guest
feet from public
rooms & 100
school or church
seats
EDEN PRAIRIE INVENTORY
To give an idea how on-sale establishments in Eden Prairie would relate to
square footage or valuation minima, the following data have been assembled from
City records. All have at least 150 seats. Building value Is the value of
construction in the year built (unless noted by "*" to show the 1988 estimated
market value). In cases where the establishment is part of a larger complex,
the value was not determined.
301
-4 -
Abby's Great American Food
Ciatti's Italian Ristorante
Edenvale Golf Club (2nd floor)
Greenstreets of Eden Prairie
Kabuki/Ernest T's Restaurant
Mexican Village Restaurant
Mirage Restaurant
Snax Bar & Grill
Stars Restaurant
Square Footage
4840
4780
4228
4887
8174
4548
5603
5194
5000
Bldg. Value
170,000
500,000
413,000
271,000*
354,000*
358,000*
383,000
ALTERNATIVES
Eden Prairie's performance criteria are relatively stringent compared with other
communities. All but one of the current or pending licenses are restaurants or
auxiliary to recreation establishments. Inasmuch as the Council has identified
having a hotel with banquet and meeting facilities as a priority for the
community, the Council may consider designating one or more licenses for this
land use. The Council is supportive of a special downtown area; an
establishment which also serves liquor could be one which would attract
desirable development to the area. Similarly, the Council may consider
designating one or more licenses for a specific geographic area(s).
Reserving two licenses for hotels would underscore the City's priority to have
lodging and meeting facilities in the community. Standards on banquet
facilities and meeting space would need to be established (for example, Marriott
Courtyard Inn has two meeting/dining rooms with seating for 43 persons in each,
an amount of space generally less than desirable for the type of hotel the City
and the Chamber of Commerce, among others, has tried to attract). With two
licenses reserved for this type of hotel use, the City would keep competition
alive in this business.
One of the concepts behind a "hometown downtown" is an opportunity to create an
entertainment district. A concentration of on-sale establishments would create
a lively, attractive ambiance as well as contain the police enforcement
associated with liquor operations. From an urban planning perspective, it
appears that four or five establishments would be an optimal number (one -
Ciatti's - is already in place). If a downtown zoning area were created,
additional controls regarding architecture, open space, adjacent uses, etc.,
could be used. Perhaps some credit for outdoor seating could be given to offset
indoor year-round seating requirements. While all on-sale establishments must
be located on commercially-zoned properties, this downtown appproach would
define further where the majority of licenses could do business in a manner
consistent with community expectations.
The alternatives above assume that the number of licenses will be fixed in
accordance with Statute. This number is tied to the decennial census or a
federally-conducted special census; consequently, it could remain at 18
throughout the 1990s unless the Council decides that taking a special census is
desirable (and cost-effective). If, as suggested, two licenses were reserved
for large hotels and three or four new licenses are reserved for "downtown", and
if the licenses for Applebees and Marriott Courtyard Inn were granted, only one
or two licenses would remain undesignated. If Councilmembers are concerned
about this situation, there is yet another alternative - a referendum to exempt
the City from the statutorily-prescribed number of licenses.
-5-
Minnesota statutes provide that a referendum may be held to a) increase the
number of licenses by a specific number above the statute, or b) to remove the
statutory limit altogether. This referendum may be held at either a general or
a special election. Either of these approaches has its advantages and
disadvantages. With an unlimited number, denial of a license may be difficult
if the applicant has met all conditions. On the other hand, the stringent
performance standards set by Eden Prairie acts to limit the number and type of
potential establishments. The City of Minnetonka, for instance, has adopted the
unlimited number option and, because of its demanding performance criteria, is
not finding this approach to be a problem.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
Depending on the types of land uses desired by the City and economic conditions,
the number of on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses may become a critical issue
during the next few years. No change in policy could be followed, in which case
those appplicants who meet the City's requirements for seating and food service
sales would be granted a license unless there wee compelling reasons for
denial. A change in policy could work to the .Ci/y's advantage to attract
desriable land uses, and perhaps to preferred areas.
As long as the number of on-sale licenses is limited by statute, staff suggests
that the Council consider an amendment to the Ordinance Code to designate a
number of the licenses remaining to be issued. If Council wishes to reserve a
number of licenses for particular types of hotels, staff will develop
definitions and prepare an ordinance. Similarly, if Council wishes to set aside
a number of licenses for a particular area such as the "hometown downtown,"
staff will delineate the area for incorporation into a proposed ordinance.
Council may also wish to consider a referendum to exceed the number of licenses
which may be issued. If the option to remove limits altogether is chosen, then
designating the types of uses and/or locations for licenses would no longer be
necessary.
No further changes are suggested in the performance standards to be met prior to
license issuance. The seating and food sales requirements appear to be working
well.
Staff will proceed based upon Council direction.
CWD:jdp
ix)
PETITION
WE, the undersigned representatives of the Cities of
Corcoran, Dayton, Greenfield, Independence, and Eden Prairie,
after careful analysis of the full impact of the landfill
siting process on our communities and others in Hennepin
County, and equally mindful of similar ongoing problems with
landfills in neighboring Anoka County, where several superfund
cleanup sites now exist, do hereby petition the Hennepin
County Board of Commissioners to join with the elected
representatives of Anoka County and any other metro county to
petition the 1989 Legislature and the Governor to repeal any
further efforts toward siting any new landfills or expansiops
in the seven county metro area under the 1980 Solid Waste
Management Law, and then to replace this parochial
couoty=by -county approach with a regional Solid Waste
Commission appointed by the Governor. Such a Commission would
be modeled on the attached proposal and, using an incentive
system, would search for and find remote and environmentally
safe solid waste processing and disposal areas outside the
present or projected growth patterns of Minnesota's urbanizing
population. We request that the new Hennepin County Board,
with its goal of a better liaison with the State Legislature,
add this proposal to its 1989 legislative agenda, and we pledge
our efforts toward this common goal.
Respectfully Submitted this 6th day of December, 1 -986:
City of Corcoran City of Dayton
By By
City of Greenfield
City of Independence
By By
City of Eden Prairie
By
METRO AREA SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
Overview Presented By
Corcoran Landfill Comdttee
November TO. 1908
A. Current Situation:
1. Hennepin County is facing a critical land use and environmental challenge in
the implementation of the 1980 Solid Waste Management law. Currently,
Environmental Impact Studies are being done on four 'candidate" landfill sites
in Hennepin County. Land use elements of the E.I.S. studies include a limited
vision of the County to the year 2000 - only eleven years from the projected
completion of the E.I.S. It is now almost nine years since the 1980 law was
passed and no landfill has been sited yet. Solid waste disposal procedures and
methods in the metro communities are now, for the most part, short -sighted, and
these short-range programs have resulted in excessive local conflict. This
nine year delay is largely the result of the public's realization that there
really is no local solution within this relatively dense population area
because all existing or proposed sites impact too many people's residences,
and this situation only worsens every year. The inground degradation time of a
landfill is long-range and the environmental impact will still, be felt well
into the 21st century.
2. Historic landfill sites currently located in the metro coaemnities are major
problems in part because the metro area has grown out to and surrounded them
with urban and suburban housing. These landfills are really industrial land
uses in a residential landscape. Private industry today would never be allowed
to create such environmental havoc on its own. Apparently government is not
bound by such environmental constraints.
3. By default, any new site in the metro counties is within the potential growth
pattern of metro urban and suburban areas over the next 50 to 100 years.
Despite a few surviving farms, the basic nature of the metro counties is now
really suburban, not rural, and the trend is for even more urbanization.
Siting new landfills in this urbanizing environment of increasingly dense
residential land use, now totally dependent upon its groundwater, is the
height of environmental folly - particularly if we are entering a drier period
as the earth's climate warms.
4. The transportation impact of massive solid waste transfers to the so-called
rural but, in fact, suburban settings in the metro area will overload the
residential character of these low grade roads and threaten the local bicycle
and pedestrian use that is now developing along these low traffic count
roadways. Projected daily traffic flows of 400 to 500 14 and 20-ton heavy
trucks will result in constant barrages of noise and imminent danger to the
school bus stops along these comparatively narrow and winding two lane
collector streets. There are no sidewalks to separate the trucks from the
pedestrians and cyclists.
-2 -
S. Overall, solid waste disposal is a long-term problem which requir
e
s
l
o
n
g
-
t
e
r
m
planning. Right now, in the late 1980's, the current Hennepin County
DEIS is using only the year 2000 Metro Urban Service Area line as a decision c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
.
Landfill siting a facility with a SO to 100 year impact that falls
b
e
y
o
n
d
a
planning line representing only an eleven year horizon is indicative
o
f
a
v
e
r
y
short-term decision procedure. It is the short-term horizon of those
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
such facilities which needs correction as much as any of the technical
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
s
involved.
6. The material put in public landfills makes such sites essentially unusab
l
e
f
o
r
urban or suburban purposes for the next SO to 100 years or more,
r
e
d
u
c
e
s
adjacent land values, and also removes the land from the tax rolls of
g
r
o
w
i
n
g
suburban communities that need the revenue for a better infrastructure.
7. High metro tipping fees are helping to force up metro landfill costs
i
n
p
a
r
t
because of this irrevocable use of expensive land and the costs to
b
u
f
f
e
r
properly a new or existing metro landfill are now becoming prohibitive
.
M
u
c
h
lower fees are available in outstate landfills, in part because they
d
o
n
o
t
have these buffer or surrounding area land use problems in low density
a
r
e
a
s
.
That is why a large share of metro garbage is already being hauled now
o
u
t
t
o
lower fee landfills.
8. Because of the constant, loud sound of heavy earth moving equipment,
a
m
o
d
e
r
n
landfill needs at least one-half mile M.O.L. buffer of land, preferably sheltered by hills, berms and mature, dense stands of screening e
v
e
r
g
r
e
e
n
trees, or even noise abatement fencing such as now used along in
t
e
r
s
t
a
t
e
hi9hways, to fully surround the active working area and separate it from existing or proposed residences over its working life. After clo
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
lanctfill, such a large land buffer is still needed to help pro
t
e
c
t
t
h
e
groundwater wells of surrounding residences, farmsteads and busines
s
e
s
o
v
e
r
the next 50 to 100 years. As can be seen, then, an 80 acre active
l
a
n
d
f
i
l
l
needs a 1120 acre M.O.L. buffer, for a total landfill site acreage
o
f
a
b
o
u
t
1200. To put in a mere 160 or even SOO acre landfill site in an urbani
z
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
is to transfer the true costs of this buffering function to the sur
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
individual land owners and their community. That is the problem
f
a
c
i
n
g
Hennepin County today at the Flying Cloud landfill in Eden Prairie. T
h
e
r
e
i
s
no rational reason for the County to repeat the Flying Cloud mistake
a
g
a
i
n
.
Hennepin County and the metro area are obviously going to continue growi
n
g
.
9. The present solid waste process, even with current levels of glass, me
t
a
l
a
n
d
paper recycling, is still largely a negative program aimed at "dispo
s
a
l
"
o
f
supposedly unwanted waste with little apparent planning to ma
k
e
t
h
e
unprocessed garbage or even burn ash residue recyclable. Recovery of
t
h
e
a
s
h
for agricultural and/or construction purposes could be both economically and environmentally cost effective. Superfund cleanups in the future wi
l
l
c
o
m
e
out of the metro taxpayers' pockets, and they do not need any more clean
u
p
s
o
f
new sites which, today, are unpolluted.
-3-
B. A Regionalized Solution:
1. While government and the public have stopped looking at solid waste as
entirely something to throw away and have started looking at it, in part, as a
valuable resource to recycle, more can be done. In addition to recyling of
metals, glass and paper we must develop technology to use the residue of burn
plants as raw material for agriculture, construction of roads, building
blocks, etc. The quantities of this residue being produced by our society
are staggering and large scale uses need Lobe developed.
2. Minnesota should use the new framework of resources and organization of the
Greater Minnesota Corporation to focus this type of technology research
through the University of Minnesota system so as to develop not only real
answers to the metro area's solid waste problem but also to develop
technology that can be marketed or licensed to other urban areas with the
same problems (another way to make Minnesota a "brainpower state"). Further,
outstate areas have the same ecological problems, even if to a somewhat
lesser degree, and the regional solutions needed for the metro area could
also be used in the outstate areas just as they now are regionalizing their
schools.and other infrastructures. Solid waste is a statewide problem.
3. The Governor needs to create a metro-wide Solid Waste Commission similar to
the Regional Airport Commission. Such a Commission mould supervise this
regional solid waste process and induce private enterprise to input revenue
to the Commission for franchises, tip fees, etc. for the rights to access to
this solid waste system. This Conmission's budget, after startup, can be
self-financed and not a burden to the State.
4. Have this Commission contract with local government agencies and property
owners in accessible sites with heavy duty road and rail transportation in
Greater Minnesota areas which need an input of industry. Such outstate areas
could become the processing and storage sites for metro solid waste residue
after the energy has been extracted at burn plants. These locations should
meet all the normal hydrological, geological, ecological and transportation
criteria now looked at for landfills, but also should be located in areas of
very low population density with no future projected chance for urbanization
in the next 100 years. Residue not reclaimed would be landfilled. A similar
incentive program on hazardous wastes has been drawing interest from
counties in depressed areas. This must be an incentive driven program.
S. To avoid the nearby neighbor problems now seen at all metro landfills such as
Flying Cloud, have the Commission contract to buy large sites of several
sections with permanent built-in buffers, such as now done on new airports to
buffer noise. The land price in outstate areas would be only 10% to 20% of
the land price in metro counties, even if located near an interestate highway
with possible rail access. Then, have the Commission lease out the
operational management, commercial, agricultural, tree farm rights, and even
landfill gas recovery, if available, in the buffer areas under normal bid
procedures. The Commission within these processing areas could also lease
land to related industrial-type firms (in the buffer) for support services.
OveralL these sites could then become small islands of industrial activity
an hence, create long-term jobs in outstate areas where such activity is
now scarce. Further, there would be steady employment since there is no
recession per se in the solid waste collection business. The resulting
-4-
landfill and solid waste processing could thus proceed at these outstata
sites without unfairly burdening nearby neighbors with this industrial type
of land use with its ever present loud noises and potentially unpleasant
landscape. Government has to recognize that landfills are messy and noisy
land uses which no resident really wants as a nearby neighbor.
6. The overall concept is to create an environmentally acceptable way to process
urban solid waste in a planned industrial park setting where it can continue
for 30, 50, even 100 years with no concern that changing land uses in the
immediate area will create a resident population around it later. Run as a
business on the model of a regional airport - with franchises to bidding
firms to carryout the various phases including conversion of the solid waste
into further end products, such as building material for roads, etc. - the
entire concept of garbage disposal can itself be disposed of and replaced
with a newer, more systematic version of resource recovery.
7. The economics of scale in handling such a process can utilize rail
transportation as well as trucks on major highways and create outstate jobs
as well as metro ones in the overall cycle of operations. A regional
governmental approach to the solid waste collection in the metro area is
mandatory to get full benefits of the economics involved. The local
governmental control at the outstate processing sites can best be done by
existing county government in the outstate area by strengthening their local
codes on industrial and landfill land uses, and having appropriate solid
waste policies from the PCA. The metro area Solid Waste Commission would
then, itself, be regulated like any other industrial owner on its outstate
land use by the local county and on its environmental effects by the State.
Such checks and balances are needed to create a watchdog system in this
ecologically sensitive business.
8. On an interim basis, before full implementatiltcould be completed of a well
thought out process, the new Solid Waste CUMmission could negotiate for
interim capacity in existing landfills beyond the growing metro area by using
the incentive of paying higher metro area tipping fees to induce private
firms and surrounding governments to continue taking the metro capacity as is
now happening. Much of the metro waste is already leaving now to surrounding
area landfills because of lower tipping fees. This orderly conversion to
outstate landfills should be organized and monitored by the new Solid Waste
Commission to ensure that environmental concerns are maintained while the
necessary and ongoing functions of timely solid waste removal from metro area
residences and businesses continues.
G. Such a Solid Waste Management Law of 1889 would allow the metro areas as well
as Greater Minnesota to prepare to enter the 21st century with a cohesive and
long-range plan for their combined solid waste handling needs. The failure
to attack this long-term recycling and landfill problem now will simply lead
us down the path to a repeat of the same mistakes of expediency that
government is experiencing with the Flying Cloud landfill site today. As one
local wag has stated, "even dogs know enough not to foul up their own,sleaping
areas." The State needs to preface any new solid waste legislation with a
repeal of any further siting efforts foilIandfill sites in the metro area
under the 1960 law. Otherwise, the local wag might further observe that
man's best friend is the more cerebral in creating a clean living
environment.
r
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources 1-+L—
DATE: December 14, 1988
SUBJECT: 1989 Cash Park Fees
At the December 6, 1988 meeting the Parks, Recreation and Natu
r
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Commission reviewed the recommendation of staff relating t
o
a
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
increase in cash park fees for 1989. The Commission noted that
P
l
y
m
o
u
t
h
w
a
s
charging $600 in 1988, Eagan $492, Maple Grove $454, Lakevil
l
e
$
5
5
0
,
p
l
u
s
a
$150 trail fee and Apple Valley 10% of the land or cash equiva
l
e
n
t
,
w
h
i
l
e
t
h
e
City of Eden Prairie was charging $440 per single family un
i
t
a
n
d
$
3
3
5
p
e
r
multi-family unit. The majority of the second tier suburbs t
h
a
t
c
h
a
r
g
e
o
n
a
per unit basis charge the same amount for multi-family as fo
r
s
i
n
g
l
e
f
a
m
i
l
y
per unit.
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recomm
e
n
d
e
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Council authorize staff to adjust the 1989 park fee closer to
t
h
e
a
c
t
u
a
l
1
0
%
value of the land.
At the December 13th meeting, the City Council continued the
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
f
o
r
1989 cash park fees to the December 20th meeting, and directed
s
t
a
f
f
t
o
r
e
v
i
e
w
fees based on average cost of undeveloped land within the MUS
A
l
i
n
e
t
h
a
t
i
s
ready for development.
The City Assessor has indicated that it is extremely difficult t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
a
n
"average" land value for undeveloped residential property due
t
o
t
h
e
v
a
r
i
e
t
y
of amenities that are available within Eden Prairie; however, he
h
a
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
the following information on recent sales of undeveloped land w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
M
U
S
A
line:
1. September 23, 1988 - Zoning Rural, Guide Plan R1-13.5 and 9
.
5
,
C
e
n
t
e
x
Corporation, 30 acres, cost $28,159 per acre.
2. October 3, 1988 - Zoning Rural, Guide Plan R1-9.5 and R1-13.5, N
e
w
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
Homes, 27.2 acres (Wyndham Knob 2nd Addition), $17,830
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
.
(included wetlands)
3. June 25, 1987 - Zoning Rural, Guide Plan R1-13.5, Jyland D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Corporation, 18.6 acres, $26,882 per acre.
4. July 3, 1987 - Zoning Rural, Guide Plan R1-13.5, New Ameri
c
a
n
H
o
m
e
s
Corporation, 40.49 acres, $21,190 per acre.
5. January 21, 1987 - Zoning Rural, Guide Plan R1-13.5, Dennis Dir
l
a
m
,
4
1
.
5
acres, $14,867 per acre. (included wetlands)
All of these are relatively large parcels zoned rural, water and sewer was
available but not installed, streets and sidewalks were not installed.
There were several other sales of land that were smaller parcels and had
zoning or had water and sewer available or streets fronting the land. All of
those parcels were quite a bit more expensive, several over $100,000 per acre.
The City should maintain a relatively simple formula for determining cash park
fees, and that formula should be tied to 10% of the value of the residential
property, so the City is not being unfair to property owners when the City
takes land in lieu of fees or vice versa.
If, for formula purposes, the City assumed an average density of two and half
units per acre and an average value of $18,000 per acre for unimproved
property within the MUSA line, the land cost per unit is $7,200. Ten percent
of the land cost per unit would he $720.
Seventeen thousand dollar per acre land would equal a park fee of $680 per
unit.
The actual land value of recent sales of large parcels of unimproved property
range from $14,867 to $28,159. The average price of those six parcels was
$22,824, which would require a $913 park fee; which may be difficult to
substantiate in some cases and would be an extreme jump in fees and not
comparable to other communities.
The Director of Parks, Recreation for the City of Plymouth has indicated they
will be raising fees to about $750 for 1989. Lakeville's fee for 1988 was
$550, plus $150 for trails, which totalled $700 for 1988. Staff believes that
It would be relatively easy to substantiate a minimum cost of $18,000 per acre
for undeveloped land within the MUSA line that is ready for development, and
would, therefore, recommend the Council consider a park fee of $720 per unit
for both multi-family and single family units for 1989.
BL:mdd
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
DATE: December 12, 1988
SUBJECT: Proposed Park Bond Referendum
At the November 21st special meeting, the City Council approved the draft of
the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Park and Open Space Plan with the recommended
revisions, and authorized staff to proceed with planning for a park bond
referendum to held in the spring of 1989.
There are two methods to approach the decision making process for the 1989
Park Bond Referendum. The first method is to follow most previous City
referendum procedures and appoint a Referendum Committee that studies all the
existing data and holds public meetings to secure input from the people, and
then makes a recommendation to the City Council on what should be on the
referendum, the amount of the referendum and the date of the referendum. At
that point, the Referendum Committee is charged with explaining the referendum
and the needs to the citizens. This process generally takes six to seven
months.
The second method is to follow the method generally used by the School
District in which the School Board, or in this case the City Council, takes
the lead role and reviews all of the data that has been collected from citizen
input through surveys, public meetings, etc. and makes a decision on what will
be on the referendum, the amount of the referendum, the date of the
referendum; and then appoints a committee that helps the School District
(City) bring the message to the community on those needs and the costs. From
the Referendum Committee's first meeting until the referendum is generally
about six weeks.
The positive thing about the first approach is that the citizens are given the
opportunity to indicate what they believe should be on the referendum prior to
the referendum. The negative about the first approach is that it may appear
as though the "people in charge" don't know what the needs are and aren't
providing community leadership, but are appointing committees to make
decisions for them. The major negative regarding the first approach is the
length of time necessary to review all the existing research on needs; thus
causing two problems: a) the committee is usually burned out after a couple
of months, and b) the interest and support of the community for a referendum
peeks well before the referendum, and by referendum time there is, or can be,
general apathy toward the issue.
The pros for the second method are that the Council or Board takes a
leadership role in the decision making process and uses all of the information
provided from citizen input, makes a positive decision and gets off to a
5)4
"running start on the referendum". Most citizen lay people are not interested
In spending week after week in evening meetings reviewing stacks of figures
and statistics justifying needs that people already know exist. They look for
the Council and staff to already have that information and generally want a
simple, straight forward task that they can accomplish within a few weeks and
be relieved of their commitment.
Citizens of Eden Prairie have had many opportunities over the last two years
to indicate to the City officials what the needs are relating to the park and
open space system. In the spring of 1987, a 7.9 million dollar referendum
for parks, trails, and Community Center addition failed by 42 votes. Shortly
after that referendum, scores of people called to apologize for not voting
because they thought it was a "sure thing". Since that referendum a survey of
all 2518 people that voted was taken to determine what was supported and what
wasn't. In early 1988, the City held four neighborhood meetings inviting
residents from each quadrant of the City to provide input on park needs and in
the summer of 1988 a newspaper survey requesting input on park needs was
completed.
The most recent newspaper survey brought the following information:
1. A high percentage of citizens use our parks.
2. People are generally pleased with the adequacy of the park system and the
maintenance of the park system.
3. There is no one particular need that the majority of the people recognize
at this time; although, most people have one interest or another that they
see as a need.
4. The highly ranked overall need is hiking/biking and nature trails; close
behind is golf, nature study, neighborhood parks and lake recreation
areas.
5. Residents are evenly split on the need for additional outdoor recreation
facilities such as: active use areas (49% in favor of more), and
additional neighborhood park areas (50% in favor of more).
6. Although only 37% favored "additional indoor recreation facilities" in
the survey, there were a sufficient amount of questions relating to the
ambiguity of the question ie. more buildings vs adding to the existing
facility, that there may be more support than perceived.
In the survey of the 2518 voters that voted in the 1987 referendum, the
following information was obtained:
1. The Community Center additions received less general support from all
voters than the park and trail development proposals.
2. Only thirty-five percent of all voters supported the ice rink addition to
the Community Center, while forty-seven percent of all voters (14% of yes
voters and 75% of no voters) were strongly or somewhat opposed to the ice
rink proposed for the Community Center.
3. Fifty percent of all voters favored Miller Park development, while 29% of
all voters were strongly or somewhat opposed to Miller Park (3% of yes
voters and 54% of no voters).
4. Forty one percent of all voters favored Purgatory Creek Recreation Area
access, while 20% of all voters were opposed to the Purgatory Creek
Recreation Area access.
5. Fifty-eight percent of all voters of the referendum supported the County
Road 4 bike trail improvements and 56% favored County Road 1 bike trail
improvements.
6. The adult softball fields, the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area and the
neighborhood parks all had more citizens "somewhat or strongly favoring"
those issues than "somewhat or strongly opposing" them, although the
softball fields would be a close call.
7. None of the proposed items had over 47% of the total voters opposed to
that particular item and after the ice rink and the indoor track no item
had more than 41% of the total voters opposed to any particular item.
8. Four items had the support of 50% or more of all voters, they include:
Miller Park 50%, County Road 4 Trail 58%, County Road 1 Trail 56%, and
Hidden Ponds Park Trail 50%. The same four items had relatively small
opposition from "overall voters": Miller Park 29%, County Road 4 Trail
23%, County Road 1 Trail 23%, and Hidden Ponds Park Trail 24%.
9. Only three items had more total voters opposing those than supporting
those items; they were the ice rink (all voters favored 35%, all voters
opposed 47%), indoor track (all votersfavored 33%, all voters opposed
47%) and aerobics room (all voters favored 38%, all voters opposed 40%).
The gym was a push (all voters favored 41%, all voters opposed 41%).
10. Approximately 79% of the citizens that returned their survey believed they
had sufficient information to vote on the referendum.
11. Sixty-five percent of those who returned the survey would support some of
these issues in the future. Only 15% of those who voted would not support
any future park improvements.
12. Sixty percent had a concern over the School Bond Referendum that was
scheduled for the fall.
13. Only 37% of the voters believe the City has a sufficient number of parks
(7% of the yes voters and 65% of the no voters).
In the updating of the Park and Open System Plan, the consultant listed the
following priorities:
1. land acquisition
2. Miller Park
3. neighborhood park improvements
4. trail system development
5. Eden Prairie Community Center improvements
6, golf course
7. Purgatory Creek Recreation Area
8. outdoor swimming facility
9. construction of special use facilities
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Commission ranked the top needs as follows:
1. land acquisition
2. Miller Park
3. Community Center
4. trail system development
5. neighborhood park improvements
The Planning Commissions ranked the top needs as follows:
1. land acquisition
2. trail system development
3. neighborhood park improvements
4. Miller park
5. outdoor swimming facility
6. The Community Center and the golf course were tied for 6th.
As the staff person directly involved in the last referendum, and having just
completed the process for updating the Park and Open Space System Plan, it is
my opinion that the needs for the park system have been studied and restudied,
and I would recommend the City Council and the Parks, Recreation and Natural
Resources Commission hold one joint public hearing to obtain input on a park
bond referendum early in 1980; then perhaps hold a joint work session to
review the data available from all of the input received from citizens of Eden
Prairie over the last three years and determine what issues should be on the
referendum, the amount of the referendum, and the date of the referendum. A
Referendum Committee should be appointed basically to take that information to
the citizens, answer questions and to get the referendum passed.
Proposed Bond Referendum Time Table:
December 20, 1988
January 3, 1989
January 10, 1989
January 24, 1989
General update on Park Bond Referendum process and
information collected to date.
Councilmembers appointed to Bond Referendum Committee
- Council authorizes Mayor to appoint citizen
chairperson for the Park Bond Referendum.
Special meeting - Mayor identifies chairperson of
Bond Referendum Committee - Councilmembers recommend
citizens for Park Bond Referendum Committee-
Director recommends staff members - Council sets
January 31, 1989 as a special public hearing for
citizen input regarding park and recreation facility
needs for 1989 Park Bond Referendum
Mayor, Bond Referendum Chairperson and Director of
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources meet with
committee members to select chairperson for
subcommittees - Subcommittees subdivide for planning
sessions
3)(11
January 31, 1989
February 14, 1989
March 1-10, 1989
March 13-Apr 14, 1989
April 18, 1989
City Council - Parks, Recreation and Natural
Resources Commission public hearing for citizen input
regarding Park Bond Referendum - staff provide
presentation on information obtained from previous
public meetings, surveys, studies, etc., citizens
provide comments on needs for park system that should
be addressed.
City Council - Parks, Recreation and Natural
Resources Commission - Referendum Committee Special
Meeting to discuss final cost projections and
referendum question - Council sets referendum dollar
amount and referendum date
Referendum Committee planning sessions
Community information sessions
Target date for referendum
This is a tentative schedule for a referendum vote for mid-April 1989.
Obviously, if there are some problems that occur regarding cost estimates,
etc. during the process, the referendum date would be set back.
Assuming that there would be some improvements to the Community Center, the
Council would probably require a schematic design by an architect in order to
obtain costs per square foot estimates. Land acquisition and park development
costs can be estimated by City staff.
If the Council determines that we should consider land acquisition for a golf
course in this bond referendum, the Council should hire a golf course
architect to do a brief study of the site (or sites) selected to determine the
amount of land required to insure that a course and community park layout
would work. This would be a $5,000-$10,000 expenditure and would probably be
a 6-8 week process, and should be authorized immediately in order to stay on
the proposed timetable.
The City Council and the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
may wish to have a joint meeting, perhaps a workshop at the Outdoor Center,
on a Saturday morning to discuss the referendum process prior to beginning
this process.
BL:mdd
919),