Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 10/04/1988 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1988 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7600 Executive Dirve COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Deb Edlund PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. MINUTES A. Joint City Council, Historical & Cultural Commission, and Page 2203 Restoration Committee meeting held Tuesday, July 19, 1988 III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List Page 2211 B. Review Bids for Community Center Tile Project Page 2212 C. Change Order No. 5 Wellhouse Construction, I.C. 52-072B Page 2216 D. Grading Permit for Starring Lake 2nd Addition (CSAH 1 west of Page 2220 Staring Lane) E. Grading Permit for Chestnut Place (northwest corner of Page 2221 Anderson Lakes Parkway and Chestnut Drive) F. Resolution approving Joint Agreement to develo2 I-494 Page 2222 Environmental Impact Statement (Resolution No. 88-219) G. CHEYENNE PLACE, by Westar Properties, Inc. 2nd Reading of Page 2223 Ordinance #41-88-PUD-12-88, Planned Unit Development District Review, with waivers, and Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 38.27 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Cheyenne Place; and Adoption of Resolution #8B-221, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #41-88-PUD-12-8B, and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 38.27 acres into 76 single family lots, 6 outlots, and road right-of-way. Location; North of County Road #1, 640 feet west of County Road #4 and County Road #1 intersection. (Ordinance #41-88-PUD-12-88, PUD District & Rezoning; Resolution #88-221, Authorizing Summary and Publication) H. Request from Southwest Cable Commission for Approval of SWING Page 2233 recommendation regarding Institutional Network City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,October 4, 1988 I. Resolution No. 88-213 Appointing Election Judges for the November Page 2240 8 General Election J. Resolution No. 88-231, Recording Partial Compliance with Page 2243 Developer's A reement Requirements for Bachman Anderson Development aka Cabriole Center) K. Resolution No. 88-232, Authorizing Permit Application for Page 2245 Fairfield L. Resolution No. 88-233 to Execute License to Cross Public Page 2246 Waters with Sanitary Sewer in Alpine Estates 2nd Addition M. PANNEKOKEKEN HUIS, Resolution No. 88-229 Denying 2nd Reading Page 2247 of Ordinance No. 33-88 from Office to C-Reg-Service IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Trunk Watermain Extension on Pioneer Trail (CSAH II from Page 2248 1r 0i feet west of Mitchell Road to approximately 2000 feet west of Eden Prairie Road (CSAH 41 and on Eden Prairie Road (CSAH 41 from Pioneer Trail (CSAH II to 600 feet north of Scenic Heights Road, I.C. 52-147 (Resolution No. 88 22 8r B. REDBURN BUILDING by Bud Redburn Insurance Agency, Inc. Request Page 2249 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Industrial to Neighborhood Commercial on 1.5 acres and from Industrial to Office on 0.58 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 0.58 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 2.33 acres into 2 lots and road right-of-way for construction of a 3,000 square foot office building. Location: East of Terrey Pine Drive, south of Highway #5, east of Burger King. (Resolution #88-223, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; Ordinance #45-88, Rezoning; Resolution #88-224, Preliminary Plat) C. PRAIRIEVIEW II by Curt Johnson Properties, Inc. Request for Page 2256 Zoning District Amendment within the C-Regional Service Zoning District on 2.17 acres for construction of a 12,658 square foot retail/office use. Location: North of Plaza Drive, east of the Prairie View Shopping Center. (Ordinance #43-88, Rezoning) D. WYNDHAM NOB 2ND ADDITION by Burl Corporation. Request for Page 2262 Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 on 7.2 acres and from Rural to R1-13.5 on 18.9 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, and Preliminary Plat of 27.2 acres into 41 single family lots, 3 outlots, and road right-of-way. Location: South of Townline Road, east of Chennault Way within Hidden Glen 3rd Addition. (Ordinance #46-88, Rezoning; Resolution #88-225, Preliminary Plat) E. CROSSTOWN PRAIRIE OFFICE WAREHOUSE by Gary A. Hilden. Request Page 2272 for Site Plan Rcview on 1.89 acres within the I-2 Zoning District with variances and Shoreland variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Preliminary Plat of 1.89 acres into one lot and road right-of-way for construction of a 19,216 square foot office warehouse. Location: South of County Road 67, east of Nine Mile Creek, north of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad. (Ordinance #47-88, Zoning District Amendment within 1-2; Resolution #88-226, Preliminary Plat) City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,Ictober 4, 1988 F. BLUESTEM 5TH AIIITION by Brown Land Company. Request for PUI Page 2281 Concept Review on 15.92 acres, PUI District Review on 15.92 acres with waivers, Zoning District Amendment within the R1-13.5 Zoning /istrict on 2.26 acres and Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 10.57 acres, Preliminary Plat of 12.83 acres into 15 single family lots, 3 outlots, and road right-of-way. Location: West of Bluestem Lane, north of Purgatory Creek. (Resolution #88-227, PUI Concept for Bluestem 5th Addition; Ordinance #4B-8B-PUB-13-88, PUI District, Zoning District Amendment within R1-13.5 District and Rezoning; Resolution #88-228, Preliminary Plat) G. Vacation 88-18, Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements in Page 2293 Fo^ st Knolls (Resolution No. 38-215) H. Vacation 88-09, Vacation of Iraina a and Utility Easements in Page 2294 Coachman's Landing 5th Addition Resolution No. 88-216) V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Page 2295 VI. ORIINANCES & RESILUTIINS VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Request for City Approval of Charitable Gambling License from Page 2096 the Hockey Association of Eden Prairie (Continued from 9/21/88) & 2296 B. Communication from Marc and JoAnn Syverson requesting Screening Page 2297 from Old Franlo Road C. Request for Liquor License for Ciatti's Italian Restaurant VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS IX. APPOINTMENTS X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIINS A. Reports of Council Members B. Report of City Manager 1. 1980 City Budget Review (Resolution No. $$-23O) Page 2299 Continued from 9/14/80 2. Funding Request from Association of Metropolitan Page 2321 Municipalities 3. Recommendation on Financial Consultants for the City Page 2327 of Eden Prairie C. Report of City Attorney D. Report of Director of Planning City Council Agenda - 4 - Tues.,October 4, 1988 E. Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources 1. Petition from Residents Along Duck Lake Trail to Eliminate Page 2328 a Portion of the Hikeway bike Path F. Report of Director of Public Works 1. Approve Plans and Specifications and Order Advertisement Page 2333 for Bids, I.C. 52-147, Eden Prairie Road and Pioneer Trail Trunk Watermain Extension Project (Resolution No. 88-217) 2. Prairie View Drive Sod Restoration G. Report of Finance Director IX. NEW BUSINESS X. ADJOURNMENT ( JOINT MEETING EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION RESTORATION COMMITTEE UNAPPROVED MINUTES TUESDAY, JULY 19, 1988 6:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gary D. Peterson, Mayor; Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION: Gwen Barker, Philip Rohler, co- chairs; John Hensrud, Thomas Howden, Laurie Koering, Richard Schuette, Stephen White RESTORATION COMMITTEE: Mona Leppla, chairperson; Jim Brown, Frank Cardarelle, John Hensrud, Don Johnson, Coralyn Koschinska, Karen Norman, John Rogers, Stephen White, Marie Wittenberg CITY STAFF: Carl Jullie, City Manager; Craig Dawson, Assistant to the City Manager; Robert Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources; Sandra F. Werts, Recreation Supervisor; Deb Edlund, Recording Secretary I . CALL TO ORDER II. INTRODUCTIONS_ III. BACKGROUND & UPDATE OF CUMMINS-GRILL HOMESTEAD John Hensrud introduced the project, its development concept and the restoration objectives. Hensrud described the homestead as a location to be used for education, a place to display turn-of-the-century skills, and a place for people to gather. Hensrud said the committees would like this to be a year round facility, showing all the seasons. He said that they would encourage residents to volunteer. Hensrud said the committees would like to provide guided tours of the farm house. Coralyn Koschinska stated that in 1979 the City Council had approved the hiring of Miller Dunwiddie Architects, Inc. to complete a feasibility study for the restoration of the Cummins-Grill Homestead and had been the basis on City Council Minutes 2 July 19, 1988 which restoration plans have been made. Koschinska said that the Restoration Committee had been in existence for 6 years and presented the restoration accomplishments thus far. She said that in 1985 the last grant was received. Bentley asked if the Committee knew how much it had cost to build the house originally. Koschinska replied that the estimate was less than $3,000. Koschinska reported that the house had been occupied since 1979. She said the renter had given notice of vacancy and believed that now was the time to leave the house vacant and not hamper the restoration efforts. Koschinska explained that access to the house had been on a limited basis and that even on Sunbonnet Days there was only access to one room of the house. Koschinska said that by having the house vacant programs could be run at the home. Koschinska explained that because the building was isolated there was a need for a security system and good exterior lighting. Koschinska reported the immediate maintenance needs to be repair the roof vents, restoration of original porches, and additional tuck pointing. She added that other needs were basement windows and repair of the interior of the house. Harris question if the security system would connect to the police department. Steve White replied that the cost did include a connection, but not to the police. Bentley said then that the Committee was looking for $15,000 to secure the building and stop the leaking in the roof. Werts said that the roof was leaking only around the vents that were not properly install. Pidcock asked if the committee could go back to the roofer to make repairs, considering that it had not been done that long ago. Bentley said that this could be possible, but it could take years, if it was taken as far as the courts. Werts replied that they certainly would try to get the roofer to come back and repair the roof. Peterson said that this could be a very minor expense. Koschinska said that the committees wanted to develop programs to be run at the house, but believed to accomplish this a permanent employee would be necessary. She said this person would be adequately trained to develop programs, train staff, recruit volunteers and to be at the home on a day to day basis to supervise repairs and restoration. Koschinska explained that there was also day to day maintenance and utilities needed. She said that the Committees were looking for a commitment from the City Council to make a commitment to fund the hiring of City Council Minutes 3 July 19, 1988 the curator and the basic maintenance at an approximate cost of $17,000 per year. Peterson asked what was included in the programs. Werts explained that wages, instruction, operating supplies, recreation equipment, electric, gas, etc. were all included in the $60,300. Pidcock asked why the house was being restored to 1910 when it was built In 1880. Koschinska replied that in 1910 the kitchen had been added, to restore to 1880 the kitchen would have to be taken off, would have to estimate what type of building was there in 1880, which would cost more than the current project. Koschlnska stated that besides the immediate maintenance needs, there would be long range needs as well. Peterson suggested that the long-range needs be projected into the annual budget. Harris asked if the Committee could foresee charging small fees for the programs. Koschinska explained that there could be small charges for programs; however, the Committee could not expect to fund the programs entirely from income from people going through the house. Harris said that these fees could take care of some of the smaller expenses. Werts explained that the committees were trying to present the costs as honestly as possible. Peterson said that previous Councils had made a commitment for the restoration and preservation of the house and he would like to see this to continue; however, he was not sure that a specific dollar commitment for an extended period of time was necessary. Hensrud explained the restoration program. He said that the exterior work would be done first. He believed that the restoration of the original porches would add to the building. Hensrud said that the repairs to the basement were essential for safety. Hensrud went on to explain that restoration costs were difficult to project because of all the unknowns and that the expertise needed in restoration work was costly. He reported the estimated costs for restoration to be $157,500 based on Foster Dunwiddie's 1979 figures. Robert Ferguson of MacDonald 6 Mack Partnership recommended adding a 175% inflation factor and that 20% needed to be added for architectural fees. Hensrud presented the timing projected for each phase of the project. He concluded by stating that he believed the project to be feasible. Pidcock asked what other cities the architect had projects in. Werts replied that in 1983 the Council had given permission for the Restoration Committee to interview L2j.c. City Council Minutes 4 July 19, 1988 architects. MacDonald & Mack Partnership had projects in Philadelphia, Seattle, Minneapolis, and Hastings. Pidcock said that in the past Hennepin Vo-Tech said that they would work for free if the materials and a master plan were furnished. She said this could reduce the costs. Werts replied that the Committee had not looked into this because restoration was a very specialized field. She said a supervisor would be necessary. Peterson said that it might be possible that the Vo-Tech could help in certain areas of the project. Hensrud said that the project was specialized, but that working with the Vo-Tech was a valid possibility. Bentley said that a recommendation to spend $250,000 or sell the house had been presented in 1981-82. He said that after many discussions the Restoration Committee was born. Bentley said that at that time the Council had decided to allow minimal spending; the refurbishing was to be done by volunteer labor and the material was to be donated. He said that fundraising had not gone well in the past. Bentley believed that the Council had to be careful about spending and suggested that the Committee do whatever could be done to cut cost, such as working with Vo-Tech, etc. Bentley pointed out that originally the restoration was to be a citizens effort - not a City effort. Bentley said that he understood the immediate need for a security system, but as far as long range maintenance, this should be directed to Staff and be brought up at the City Budget meeting. Pidcock asked Werts to explain who Foster Dunwiddie was and his relationship to the project. Sandy replied that Foster Dunwiddie was the original architect on the project and the firm that had prepared the feasibility study. The Restoration Committee had changed to MacDonald & Mack Partnership because of the stance the firm takes with their projects, the small size fo the firm, and the Committee would be dealing with the principals of the firm. Anderson stated that the Council in 1982 took the posture that the building had to be saved, it was hoped that residents would find ways to accomplish the restoration. He said that now the City had acquired the Douglas House and was trying to purchase the Riley House. Anderson said that now the City is not just dealing with one house but with 3 or 4, and he believed that priorities needed to be established and consideration given as to what means were available to deal with all four..He said that the original intent was for the City to keep the buildings intact, not to restore them. City Council Minutes 5 July 19, 1988 Pidcock believed that the proposed electrical updating costs were high. Werts said that the framing in the older homes is not like modern homes. Peterson asked if the Council's posture had changed regarding preservation and/or restoration and suggested that this be discussed at a separate meeting. Anderson commented that the major costs of the project were not materials but labor, and believed that the Committees needed to take a serious look at what did not take expertise, such as: electrical, plumbing, tuck pointing. He said that with this being a non-profit venture that he believed the Vo-Tech offer should be looked into. Bentley asked about the timeline for the foundation work and inquired about how badly the foundation was in need of repair. Hensrud replied that per the Dunwiddie report the posts and columns were in need of repair and a wall needed to be stabilized. Jim Brown said that the foundation was solid and was made of natural rock. He said that the foundation would not take a lot of materials or money. Brown said that the foundation needed to be sprayed with a sealant to prevent erosion, a new cellar door would be necessary, and some repair to the windows was required. Bentley said that the reason he had questioned this was because the report listed a figure of $14,700 to stabilize the foundation and he believed that to be high. Werts said that this figure was from the Dunwiddie report plus 175% inflation. Werts further commented that Ferguson had told her that it was hard to apply the inflation costs straight across the board for the whole project and that possibly this could be high. She stated that no maintenance had been done to the basement. Bentley said that it would be helpful to look at the figures based on today's costs and that a breakdown of the material and labor for each item would give a better picture for Staff to look at. Werts replied that this would require a fee for the architects' cost and recommended going to a restoration architect. It was discussed about having the Vo-Tech do the estimates and Werts commented that it did require a certain expertise to do this properly. Bentley agreed that the estimates need to be done correctly. Anderson asked City Manager Jullie if any money was presently allocated for maintenance. Jullie replied that nothing had been programmed. Anderson believed that it was important to set within the budget a maintenance allowance so that the building did not deteriorate any further; however, he said he was not sure where to go beyond that point. ).207 City Council Minutes 6 July 19, 1988 Peterson stated that the Council needed to respond to the committees and let them know clearly that the Council would like to proceed in a new direction. He said that in a number of areas the City makes a commitment and a dollar investment in that which contributes to the quality of life of its people, such as parks, open spaces and roads. Peterson believed that it was time for the Council to take another step in the direction of restoration, so that these houses are open and usable. He said that he understood that the restoration costs money and that the money would come from tax dollars and further commented that the Council needed to be careful in spending those dollars; therefore, if there were alternatives that could possibly save money, those needed to be studied. Peterson believed that the Council should make a commitment to require the property to be vacant, provide a security and lighting system, and to authorize the necessary repairs to stabilize the building. Jim Brown said that there was a problem with liability insurance coverage for volunteers because as the house is on City property and the City owns the house, the work had to be done by City workers. Bentley believed that the insurance problem had been resolved. Jullie replied that the workers needed to be supervised. He said that possibly a special rider was necessary and he would look into the insurance matter. Harris stated that the City was entering a new phase and if the history of Eden Prairie was going to be preserved it was time to take a more aggressive stance. Harris supported the funding for security and lighting of the house. She said that since the City owned more than one house it was important for the Commission to let the Council know what would be expected for the other facilities. Gwen Barker said that the Commission believed that the City of Eden Prairie had made a statement as to the interest in restoration with the purchase of the Smith- Douglas and Riley homes. She said that the benefits were that the homes were on the existing sites and the committees had an opportunity to develop the sites as living symbols - not as museums. Barker said that the Smith-Douglas-More house was a 5-bedroom house which used to house travelers, and the Commission was looking at this house being a bed-and-breakfast facility. The Riley House was being considered as a possibility for a living farm or possibly as an art center. Barker said that the City had made the commitment to buy the property, but believed that now was the time to go a step further. Harris asked what were other possibilities for funding besides the City. Werts replied that the there was little City Council Minutes 7 July 19, 1988 or no grant money available. She said that a master plan needed to be in place before going for further grants. Werts discussed the possibilities and explained what had been done in the past, but stated discouragement. She said that she had not gone to corporations because of not having a specific plan in place. Werts said that the Committee does get gifts and donations, but are small compared to the expenses. Harris encouraged the Committee to again investigate funding sources. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris that the Cummins-Grill Homestead be left vacant after the current renter vacates on August 1, 1988. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to authorize the expenditure of up to $7,000 to install a security system and exterior lighting system. Pidcock asked the Committee to check with the Vo-Tech to see if they could help with the lighting. Peterson said that would be an underlying request on all of the items. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to direct Staff to provide additional information for a part-time curator and the request for $50,000 over a 5-year period for the budget review process. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to direct City Manager Jullie to look into specifics of attaining designation as a "certified local government". Pidcock asked for a report on the information about becoming a "certified local government". Bentley asked if the report could be presented in a month. Motion carried unanimously. Don Johnson believed that the City was moving in the right direction and that more people would now be able to enjoy the house. He said the house needed to be used and believed that the part-time curator position was necessary. Johnson said that the Commission and Committee would be watching the costs carefully. aao9 City Council Minutes 8 July 19, 1988 Pidcock thanked the Restoration Committee and Commission for their work. Bentley commended the organizations for the well put together presentation. Meeting adjourned at 7:25PM. Aa io I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST October 4, 1988 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) PLUMBING M. Bakke, Inc. Barnes Plumbing Co., Inc. New American Homes Corp. Janecky Plumbing Meier Plumbing Minnesota Mechanical, Inc. CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY) Moundsview Plumbing Southwest Plumbing Aspen Realty, Inc. Chanhassen Kitchen & Bath Character Builders, Inc. HEATING & VENTILATING Harju Construction, Inc. Johnson & Johnson Building, Inc. BSC Mechanical Kingsview Builders, Inc. Cherokee Refrigeration, Inc. Kuiper Specialties Twin City Temperature Control, Inc. Mosiman Construction Company Wonderful World of Pets GAS FITTER Unique Air, Inc. These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. J at So ie Licensing 22 /I MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources :. DATE: September 28, 1988 SUBJECT: Bids for Community Center Tile Project The 1988 budget included $20,000 for tiling the Community Center pool deck. Earlier this year, the City authorized obtaining bids for tiling the Community Center deck and the men's and women's locker room floors. Staff had an estimate for $24,000 for this project. During the design period, the Community Center maintenance staff had requested that the tile project include a 4" tile base around the deck for maintenance purposes and to include tiling a portion of two of the locker room walls (again for ease of maintaining a sanitary condition in the locker rooms). The architect indicated these two changes would add some additional cost to the project, but not a significant amount. On Tuesday, September 27, 1988, at 2 P.M., the City opened bids for this project. The City received one bid from Land of Lakes Tile Company for $42,390 and a deduct of $3,950 if only the deck were tiled and the locker rooms were deleted. Shortly before the bid opening, staff received calls from two different tile contractors who indicated they were under the understanding that they could call in a bid prior to 2 P. M. and follow-up with a written bid. Both contractors indicated that, as tile contractors, they are generally the subcontractor and as such they wait for a general contractor to contact them to provide a bid. Neither contractor realized that we were obtaining bids directly from tile contractors and they were required to obtain bid documents from the architect. The architect has indicated that they called the four major tile contractors each on three different occasions reminding them of this situation; however, only one tile contractor actually took the time to pick up the bids and submit the proper documents. This situation is extremely frustrating to the staff as we have already caused a great inconvenience to the general public by cancelling one session of the swim lessons and by requiring the Boy's Swim Team to find an alternative swimming site for three weeks during this proposed construction season; however, due to the significantly higher cost than projected and the fact that we received only one bid when we are aware of at least two additional large contractors that are interested in the project, staff would recommend rejecting this bid and authorizing staff to rebid this project. A rebid may not produce any significant reduction in cost; however, having a project come in so high over cost estimates and with only one bidder, staff recommends attempting to get additional bids to insure a fair price for this project. The bidder had the following breakdown for costs: $22,000 pool deck tile - 1987 estimate 3,900 locker room tile - 1987 estimate 25,900 1987 estimate $2,500 (10% increase for 1 year since 1987 estimate) $3,200 base around deck 600 patch locker room floor after adding floor drains 700 wall tile in rocker room 3,700 new tile border around pool (to make tile floor flush with pool edge) 1,500 wet grinding system (to insure no dust, etc. in pool water) 500 tile & drain pitch (to insure tile is flush with floor drains on pool deck 3,000 bond, insurance and administration costs $4 600 new total with changes Due to the inability to meet the projected closing of the pool for late November/early December, staff recommends that this project be delayed until 1989. The $20,000 budgeted in 1988 would go to the General Fund. An authorization of $42,000 should be included in the 1989 budget and would be funded with an additional $22,DDO from the General Fund balance. BL:mdd �I� CEMAMIC TILL QUARRY TILE IAMB) CF I.��►0kl=� MARBLE and SLATE V1� TILE: CO. RESIDENTIAL and COMMERCIAL INSTALLATION 5215W.BROADWAY • MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55429 • 612/537 5111 September 27, 1988 BID TO: City of Eden Prairie Director of Community Services 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677 BID FROM: Land Of Lakes Tile Co. 5215 W. Broadway Minneapolis, MN 55429 The undersigned proposes to furnish labor, materials and equipment required for construction of 1988 Natatorium Remodeling to Eden Prairie Community Center ' Eden Prairie, Minnesota in accordance with Project Manual dated September 1, 1988, Drawings mentioned therein and subsequent addenda thereto, as prepared by Setter, Leach 6 Lindstrom, Inc., Architects, Engineers and Planners, 1011 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55403, for consideration of following amount: BASE BID Forty-two thousand three hundred ninety and no/100----Dollars ($42,390.00). Alternate No. 1: Deduct the sum of Three thousand nine hundred fifty and no/100 Dolalrs 03,950.00) Attached hereto is Certified Check in the amount of Two thousand one hundred twenty and no/100 dollars ($2,120.00). We agree to abide by the Instructions to Bidders regarding disposition of Bid Security. We have examined Bidding and Contract Information, Technical Specifications and Drawings and have examined site of proposed work. We agree, if this bid is accepted, to execute a lump sum contract for the work and will furnish performance and materials payment bond in full amount of contract issued by State Surety Company of Des Moines. Page 1 of 2 21W BID TO: City Of Eden Prairie 8 BID FROM: Land Of Lakes Tile Co. BID FOR: 1988 Natatorium Remodeling to Eden Prairie Community Center We have sufficient personnel and equipment and have verified material availa- bility and agree to complete work on or before December 22, 1988 Owner reserves right to reject bids and to waive irregularities therein. It is agreed this bid may not be withdrawn for a period of forty-five (45) calendar days after day and hour bids are due. In event that additions to Contract are ordered by Owner, Following percent- ages of actual cost of additions shall be added to compensate Contractor for overhead and profit: 15% for work performed by Contractor's own employees. 10% for work performed by a Subcontractor. If Owner orders reductions, deletions or omissions from Contract, following percentages of actual cost of reductions, deletions or omissions shall be included as further reducing the Contract amount to compensate for Contractor's overhead and profit not applicable to the Project: 10% for work deducted from work performed by Contractor's own employees. 5% for work deducted from work performed by a Subcontractor. ADDENDUM RECEIPT Receipt of the following addenda is acknowledged: Addendum No. NONE Date LAND OF LAKES ILE CO. D By: Si Brannan Sec/Treas. 5215 West Broadway, Minneapolis, MN 55429 Page 2 of 2 ,4,�15 • EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA WATER WORKS IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 52-072B CONTRACT NO. 2 WATER SUPPLY IMPROVEMENTS SECTION II - WELL HOUSES AND SITE WORK CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 I. SCOPE This Change Order No. 5 will adjust the Contract price to account for the revised engine cooling water discharge at Well No. 7 and a structurally supported slab for the transformer at Well No. 1D. II. CHANGE ORDER ITEMS A. REVISED ENGINE COOLING WATER DISCHARGE AT WELL NO. 7 The engine cooling water discharge at Well No. 7 shall be revised to direct the discharge to Purgatory Creek. The revised discharge shall be in accordance with attached figures C05-1 and C05-2. B. TRANSFORMER SUPPORT SLAB AT WELL NO. 10 A structurally supported slab shall be provided for support of the electrical power transformer at Well No. 10. The slab shall be constructed in accordance with Black & Veatch's letter dated June 21, 1988 and the attached sketches. III. CHANGES IN CONTRACT AMOUNT Adjustments to the Contract price resulting from the aforementioned items shall be the following negotiated lump sum prices: Item Amount A. Revised Cooling Water Discharge at Well No. 7 $ 7,719.00 B. Transformer Support Slab at Well No. 10 8,449.00 Total - Change Order No. 5 $16,168.00 The net change to the Contract price is summarized as follows: Current Contract Price Change Order No. 5 $1,667,522.50 16,168.00 New Contract Price $1,683,690.50 A2AS091288 C05-1 22I(D • IV. ACCEPTANCE The changes and conditions set forth in this Change Order No. 5 are hereby accepted. All other provisions of the Contract, including Contract time, remain unchanged. BARBAROSSA AND SONS, INC. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA (Contractor) (Owner) By By Director of Public Yorks Date q- '6/4>8 Date A2AS091288 C05-2 2 21'7 Q W E 2 7 4 y -aF.- N 2 O u WW rN ^o ZO d0 ¢ zW W 1- W W §3 } l/ // Qa JLJ / 2 i / I WW = 1WQ Z V /II ..��� / x Q eW " 1 ; Q N t uWmy ~ t. ' ' ur ' I co,a Nj 7I ii 8i t uI O #I1,_// zZ...,t W o w C o I I b 1 i `' i.• Ni 03 . W N i 1 2217 6'Flop gate - Provide 3'-0%i4.0° �s �`\ j ,'/Prop m - - u - EL639.0 J(.'°lo" . G-itnN ;'- ,'' 16', 3"-O'' ,?/prof, k 1 q i G, ' I 1 0 PICCool/ng wafer 1iscna ge -Inv. El.639.70 I'head wall Ncte : . 9ypase ,7-ad,va/l '� be field Incofed by Engineer 1 LAN • a DISCHARGE HEADWALL C 5co%:3/e"-l'-0' -I BLACK &VEATCH EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA ENGINEERs.ARCHrrEcrs WATER SUPPLY IMPROVEMENTS DAII MAY 13,1988 • �II MU WELL HOUSE N0.7 • 112106.CPS ENGINE COOLING WATER-DISCHARGE FIGURE C05-2 • • 22.19 • - M E M O R A N D U M - TD: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician •- DATE: September 29, 1988 /v\ RE: Grading Permit for Starring Lake 2nd Addition The Developers, Scenic Heights Investment, have requested City Council approval of their request of an early grading permit for site grading on Starring Lake 2nd Addition. The project is located north of Pioneer Trail between Sunrise Circle and Starring Lane in the south half of Section 21. This request comes prior to Council 2nd Reading of the zoning ordinance in an effort by the developer to construct this project prior to winter freeze up. This proposal is consistent with previous plans approved through the Planning Commission and City Council levels. The Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District has reviewed this plan and issued their appropriate permit for grading. Recommend City Council approval of the Developer's request for grading permit subject to installation of erosion control as shown on attached plans, installation of tree protection around trees meant to be saved and the standard requirements for land alterations per City Code. JJ:ss Attachments 222� - MEMORANDUM - TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician,' DATE: September 29, 1988 RE: Grading Permit for Chestnut Place Chestnut Place Partners have requested City Council approval of their request for an early grading permit to commence site grading at the proposed Chestnut Place. Chestnut Place is a proposed neighborhood commercial center located at the northwest corner of Chestnut Drive and Anderson Lakes Parkway. This request comes between the 1st and 2nd Reading of the zoning ordinance and is meant to allow the Developer an early start in his site preparation work, consisting of soils corrections and overall site grading. This site is heavily vegetated with small trees and shrubs not considered significant within Eden Prairie's tree replacement policy. This vegetation would be removed with the development of the site and be replaced by landscape materials consistent with City Code. The site plan has been reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council in a preliminary way, and this request is consistent with that site plan. Recommend approval of Chestnut Place Partners request for early grading permit subject to installation of erosion control and the standard requirements for land alternation as per City Code. JJ:ss 22?4 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-219 RESOLUTION REGARDING PROPOSED AGREEMENT NUMBER 64723 AGREEMENT FOR INTERSTATE I-494 EIS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie is the official governing body of the City of Eden Prairie; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council in cooperation with the five cities in the project area did produce a Corridor Study for I-494, and WHEREAS, it has been determined by the City of Eden Prairie that the project development process be continued by conducting the Environmental Impact State- ment (EIS) for I-494 from the Minnesota River to the I-394 Interchange, and WHEREAS, the general objective in preparing the EIS is to help resolve uncertainty about ultimate roadway design, ail ow advanced rights-of-way acquisition consistent with Federal requirements, and position projects in the corridor described above to be ready to use funds when they are available, and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie will benefit from the results of the EIS and is willing to share proportionately in the cost of the preparation and completion of the EIS, and WHEREAS, it is the expressed interest of the City of Eden Prairie to participate and cooperate in the preparation and completion of the said EIS and, WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation for the State of Minnesota has prepared an environmental agreement for conducting ronmental impactstatementforex sharing the cost o494f pr within g the corporate limits of the City of Eden Prairie and seeks approval thereof; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Eden Prairie that said agreement for the preparation and payment for the I-494 environmental impact statement be and hereby are approved and that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to sign the document on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on October 4, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frame, Clerk 2222 Cheyenne Place CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 41-88-PUD-12-88 AN ORDINANCE DF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 12-88- R1-13.5 District (hereinafter "PUD 12-88-R1-13.5"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of October 4, 1988, entered into between Westar Properties, Inc., and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement and Supplement contain the terms and conditions of PUD 12-88-R1-13.5, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD 12-88-R1-13.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD 12-88-R1-13.5 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unifiea environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code, that are contained in PUD 12-88-R1-13.5, are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD 12-88-R1-13.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is, removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 12-88-R1-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their �aa3 entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 6th day of September, 1988, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 4th day of October, 1988. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of 2aaci EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION The East Half of the South West Quarter of the Northeast ' Quarter and that part of the East Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter lying North of the centerline of County Road No. 1; all in Section 20-, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The •West 40 rods of that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter lying north of County Road No. 1, Section 20, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota. • • 222S Cheyenne Place DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1988, by Westar Properties, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept on 38.27 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review, with waivers, with underlying Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 38.27 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 38.27 acres into 76 single family lots, four outlots, and road right-of-way, all said 38.27 acres, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #41-88-PUD- 12-88, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: 1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the materials revised and dated August 19, 1988, reviewed and approved Exhibitby the City Council B, subject to such changestember 6 98 attached8, and andmodificationsasheprovided herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein. 2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. Developer acknowledges that the property shall be subject to the final report and findings of the Southwest Area Study being prepared by the City. If the final report and findings of the Southwest Area Study indicate any change to the design of any of the elements, 22Z(o including, but not limited to utilities, streets, phasing, designated normal and high water mark (elevations) for the ponds, street access, and road alignments, for the property, Developer agrees to amend said design element(s) and to obtain approval of said amendments from the City, prior to final plat approval by the City. 4. Concurrent with, and as part of the final plat for the property, Developer agrees to dedicate to the City, free of any liens, mortgages, or encumbrances, Outlots C and D, for conservation and park purposes, said outlots as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, and made a part hereof. 5. Prior to release by the City of the final plat, Developer agrees to execute a special assessment agreement with the City for purposes of public storm sewer construction to service the property. 6. Prior to release by the City of the final plat for the property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, and erosion control for the property. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 7. Prior to release by the City of the final plat for the property, Developer agrees to submit to the Director of Planning, and to obtain the Director's approval of a revised grading plan which provides for berming along the lots adjacent to County Road #1 and along the lots adjacent to Cedar Ridge Elementary School, all as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. 8. As part of the development of the property, Developer agrees to provide for sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer through the property to the west property line of the Cedar Lake Elementary School for connection by May 31, 1989. Said watermain service shall consist of two separate connections to the school's west boundary line to allow for a looped watermain system around the school. Developer further agrees that, if Developer decides not to proceed with development of the property, Developer will provide a utility and drainage easements and right of entry for the City to construct the utilities described above to the school through the property. 9. Developer agrees to notify the City and the Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of any grading, or tree removal, on the property. 10. Developer has submitted to the City, and obtained the City's approval of, a tree replacement plan for 211 caliper inches of trees which are planned to be removed from the property due to construction on said property as approved by City. Developer agrees to implement, or cause to be implemented, said tree replacement plan, in accordance with the Tree Preservation Policy of the City, attached hereto as Exhibit D, and made a part hereof. 11. Developer agrees to implement erosion control measures and adequate protective measures for areas to be preserved and areas where grading is not to occur, and to receive City approval of said measures. Developer agrees that said protective measures shall include, but not be limited to: A. Grading shall be confined to that area of the property within the construction limits. B. Snow fencing shall be placed at the construction limits within the wooded areas of the property prior to any grading upon the property. C. City shall perform an on-site inspection of said protective measures on the property by the City. Developer shall contact City for said inspection. Developer agrees that defects in materials and workmanship in the implementation of said measures shall then be determined by the City. D. Defects in materials or workmanship, if any, shall be corrected by Developer. Developer agrees to call City for reinspection of the implementation measures, and to receive approval by the City prior to issuance of the grading permit by the City. Approval of materials and workmanship may be subject to such conditions as the City may impose at the time of acceptance. 12. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning and receive the Director's approval of a tree inventory of those trees within 25 ft. outside of the construction area, which are not planned to be removed by construction on the property as approved by City, indicating the size, type, and location of all trees twelve (12) inches in diameter, or greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground level. 13. If any such trees are removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction area, Developer agrees that prior to issuance of any building permit for the property, Developer shall: A. Submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of a reforestation plan for all trees removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction area. Said plan shall indicate that the trees shall be replaced by similar tree species and that the trees used for reforestation shall be no less than three inches in diameter. The amount of trees to be replaced shall be determined by the Director of Planning, using a square inch per square inch basis, according to the area of the circle created by a cross sectional cut through the diameter of a 2227 tree as measured 4.5 feet above the ground. B. Prepare and submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of a written estimate of the costs of the reforestation work to be completed. C. Submit a bond, or letter of credit, guaranteeing completion of all reforestation work as approved by the Director of Planning. Developer agrees that the amount of the bond, or letter of credit, shall be 150% of the approved estimated cost of implementation of all reforestation work and shall be in such form and contain such other provisions and terms as may be required by the Director of Planning. Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the Director of Planning. 14. Concurrent with street and utility construction on the property, Developer agrees to construct, or cause to be constructed, sidewalks and trails in the following locations: A. A five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the north side of Pioneer Trail, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. B. A five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the east and north sides of Street A, to the south edge of its intersection with Street B and along the west side of Street A from its northerly intersection with Street B to the north edge of its intersection with Street F, all as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. C. A five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Street B in the following locations: Along the entire frontage of Lots 4 - 6, Block B, along the entire frontage of Outlot D, along the entire frontage of Lots 1 -11, Block 7, including the entire dimension of the cul-de-sac, and along the entire frontage of Lots 7 - 9, Block 4, all is depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. D. A five-foot wide sidewalk along the east side of Street D, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. E. A five-foot wide sidewalk along the north and west sides of Street E, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. F. A five-foot wide sidewalk along the north side of Street F, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. G. An eight-foot wide bituminous trail through Outlot D, connecting Street B to the City land to the east, and a second section of eight-foot wide bituminous trail within said Outlot D, connecting the intersection of Streets A and D to the City land and generally located along the westerly 2229 edge of the low area within Outlot D, all as depicted in Exhibit 8, attached hereto. Said sidewalks and trails shall be constructed according to City standards and specifications for such improvements, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 15. Prior to release of any building permit upon the property, and concurrent with utility and street construction on the p property, Developer agrees to provide to the City, and to obtain the City's approval of a temporary twenty-foot wide driveway access easement for emergency vehicles only, through Lot 2, Block 4, connecting to the east boundary line of the Cedar Lake Elementary School property. Developer agrees that, concurrent with street and utility construction, Developer shall construct said driveway with a 20 ft. aggregate base, a ten foot wide paved surface, and knock-down barriers. Said driveway Developer agrees not to remove said driveway until such time as a permanent public street is constructed along the west boundary of the school land. 16. Developer and City acknowledge that Street E and Street F, as fordein appred r cconstructionbas ttemporary dead-rend, are heein the west boundary of the property. Developer agrees to use signage, approved by the City Engineer, to label said streets as temporary dead-ends for the information of current and future residents of the property, and for residents of adjacent properties. 17. Developer and City acknowledge that Outlots A and B, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, are remnant parcels of the property and that said outlots are not large enough for construction of housing units on the property. Developer and City acknowledge, further, that it is the intent of Developer to work with adjacent property owners to include said remnant parcels with other adjacent lands to create buildable lots which meet City Code requirements in terms of size, shape, and land use. 18. As part of Planned Unit Development #12-88, City hereby grants a waiver from the requirements of Chapter 11 to allow for lot width at the street frontage to be reduced to 70 ft. from 85 ft. for the following lots as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto: Lots 7 and 8, Block 2 Lot 6, Block 8 Lots 5 and 6, Block 9 2230 Cheyenne Place 11 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN CDUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-221 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE 41-88-PUD-12-88 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 41-88-PUD-12-88 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 4th day of October, 1988; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 41-88-PUD-12-88, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in Minn. Stat. sec. 331.D7. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 41-88-PUD-12-88 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on October 4, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 22;j qy Cheyenne Place CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 41-88-PUD-12-88 AN N ORDINANCE DISTRICT AND PLACING IT INANOTHER, AMENDINGA�THEMOLEGALCDESCRIPTIONSF ROM ONE ZONING OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summar : This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located north of County Road , west of County Road #4, from the Rural District to the R1-13.5 District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1988. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.) 3a. SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION CitIkrl,.t1\1'Inie.li 1. 9,0).AUf illl,llkl PLva 9.00\Ae•.i nnth 'i ect RI mtin,r um,.\I\ SS i I inI't N9t.t,-ll September 16, 1988 Cc-, 4 c. Inn$ v._i' I j J Mr. Carl Jullie City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Jullie: The Southwest Suburban Cable Commission (SWSCC) reviewed the study and report of the Southwest Institutional Network Group ("SWING") at the Commission meeting on September 7, 1988. As provided in the Performance Agreement of 1985, SWING was to study the economic viability of requiring the cable company to build a 166-mile institutional network in the Southwest Suburbs. The group recently completed its study, as you know, which included investigation of both commercial and school district users' needs and possible economic support of the network. The Commission asks that you put the attached summary of the SWING process, along with the Commission's recommendations on page 4 of the attachment, on your next city council meeting agenda for review and approval. The Commission recommends acceptance of its three recommendations by your City. The request for approval includes authorization for the Commission to expend $17,660.50 out of the settlement proceeds, to match the cable company's contribution to enhance the subscriber network. As you'll recall, the enhancement of the subscriber network doubles the channel capacity for institutional users, which include all five cities and the school districts. The Commission felt that, at this point, it was critical to get the enhancement started, as Rogers Cablesystems is committed to providing it rather than to wait for a co-payment from the school districts. The Commission has taken the position that future loaning of the public and government access channels will be done on a cost basis in order to recoup some of the cost of this project from the school districts. Please understand, however, that the cities are direct beneficiaries of the enhancement as it doubles their channel capacity also--this contributed to the Commission's decision to support the project financially. Please contact Ann Mathews of my office when your council has acted on the enclosed report. The cable company is prepared is 3 l:iur. dEden I'rairic.l(Jin,i.I I()plans, \htutrhnnka&Richfield .. Mr. Carl Jullie September 16, 1988 Page 2 to order the equipment once all five cities have passed the three recommendations of the Commission. If you have any questions concerning this material, please call either Ann or myself. Very truly yours, • Adrian E. Herbst SW2/kd Enclosures cc: Debra S. Cottone • 22 I SUMMARY OF THE SOUTHWEST INSTITUTIONAL NETWORK GROUP'S STUDY OF THE VIABILITY OF THE INSTITUTIONAL NETWORK IN THE SOUTHWEST SUBURBS During relief negotiations with Rogers Cablesystems, Inc., in 1985, the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission (SWSCC) agreed to temporarily relieve Rogers of their obligation to provide a 166-mile institutional network throughout the Southwest suburbs providing 472 channels for video, voice and data transmission. The relief of this obligation was hinged on the formation of a study group to evaluate the viability of such a network in the area. The Performance Agreement of 1985 set out guidelines fcr the establishment of the study group, along with membership guidelines and the parameters of their study and report. In the Spring of 1987, the SWSCC and Rogers sought representatives from the community to serve on the study group named the Southwest Institutional Network Group ("SWING"). SWING was made up of four appointees selected by the Commission and four appointees selected by Rogers. The Chairperson was named by the Cable Commission. The membership was made up of representatives from the cable industry, telecommunications industry and the school district. It was staffed :;y both the Commission and Rogers. SWING began their study in August 1987 by reviewing the original franchise provisions, along with the structure of the institutional network and its applications. A large part of their charge involved assessment of the Financial viability of building such a network. Therefore, SWING initially reviewed potential uses by area businesses and followed a process of meeting with and surveying Eden Prairie businesses on their voice, data and video transmission needs over the next five or so years. Eden Prairie was chosen due to its density of new businesses. Twenty-nine area businesses and institutions were contacted to attend an informational meeting on January 21, 1928, and were sent a survey to complete on their technology needs. Ten people representing nine organizations attended the informational session. Eight organizations returned a completed survey. The survey and presentation to interested businesses did not prove fruitful in demonstrating backing for such a network. At the SWING meeting in March 1988, a member of SWING who is also a member of the Educational Cable Coordinating Committee (ECCC), requested that a separate process be used to review institutional uses within the school districts before SWING made its recommendations to the Cable Commission. I-net Report September 16, 1988 Page 2 In response to this request, SWING developed a needs assessment survey and distributed it to the ECCC representative from each of the five school districts, Hennepin County Library and Intermediate District 287. The survey requested projected uses of the technology for the years 1988-1995. The three-month process of SWING's staff working with the ECCC to assess their specific needs resulted in a joint presentation put together by Rogers Cablesystems and the ECCC to explain uses of the technology, associated options, and costs of providing such services to the SW school superintendents and SWING. Two of the six involved school superintendents attended the presentation, although all had originally indicated an interest in attending on May 24, 1988. All representatives from the ECCC attended the presentation except the representative from the Hennepin County Library. The joint presentation included a description of the schools' need of the interactive classroom technology, along with an outline by Rogers of two options for meeting those needs. The first option involved expansion of the subscriber network to double the current capacity to all school institutions at a cost of $35,321. The second option, which had greater long-term use but limited the users to eight secondary schools, was a mini I- net at a cost of $643,691. Discussion occurred concerning variations of the options, as well as to compare the cable options with Northwestern Bell's recent proposal to the school districts. The SWING committee convened two more times to develop their recommendations to the SWSCC based on their consideration of the viability of an institutional network. Their evaluation was based on a study of the applications of the technology, as well as potential interest in the technology by revenue-generating users, as well as nonrevenue-generating users. SUMMARY OF SWING'S FINDINGS The Committee recognizes the unique limitations of coaxial cable I-net applications and the attendant marketing challenges. The following findings have been developed as a result of our study of the technology and economic feasibility of building and marketing an I-net in the SW franchise area: o The I-net applications discussed in the company's original proposal and included in the 1981 franchise document are I-net Report September 16, 1988 Page 3 largely obsolete. Some of the technologies were never developed as originally conceived. o Some telecommunications needs are better served by alternative technologies which offer greater capacity, increased transmission speed and eliminate geographical limitations. o A survey of targeted Eden Prairie businesses and government agencies indicated minimal interest in the I-net and an unlikely near-term market among potential revenue-generating users. o There exists a strong interest among members of the Educational Cable Coordinating Committee to cablecast interactive classroom programming on a mini I-net connecting SW schools. However, among school district superintendents, there is no demonstrated commitment for capacity beyond that which may be provided on the residential network. o The Committee has been unable to identify any revenue- generating institutional users, either public or private, to support the building of an I-net. If the I-net were built today, it would be wholly-subsidized by the residential subscriber who would not realize any benefit to the residential network. The Committee, therefore, finds that the I-net is not economically feasible in today's market and in the foreseeable future. o The Committee identifies three costs: 1) a fully-built 166- mile I-net at 3-to-4 million dollars; 2) a 41-mile mini I- net at $643,691; and 3) enhancement of the residential network for institutional uses by nonrevenue-generating public users at $35,321. o The company presently employs one full-time sales engineer, 80% time-dedicated, to market institutional uses to companies in the Southwest and Minneapolis franchise area. Oversight is provided by the local Vice President of Engineering. In addition, the company employs a business network manager at its U.S. corporate level to assist local efforts in the development of I-net business. RECOMMENDATIONS OF SWING In consideration of its findings and charge, SWING made the following recommendations to the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission: I-net Report September 16, 1988 Page 4 1) The requirement to build an I-net in the SW franchise area should be deferred for a minimum of five years or until such time as a sizable base of institutional users is identified and secured to finance the capital expense without cable subscriber subsidy. 2) Future study of the telecommunications market and economic feasibility of the I-net should be at the Commission's discretion. 3) An enhancement of the residential network should be implemented in a 50% cost-split with the participating school districts with a maximum cost contribution by the cable company up to $17,660.50. By the addition of equipment at Rogers' headend, the subscriber network's current capacity for video conferencing applications will double. With the addition of equipment, not only can two channels be transmitted per city, but once received at the headend, they can be discreetly routed to one or more cities. This doubles the capacity for the school's interactive classroom use. This recommendation permits each district to make an independent decision to participate if so desired. Any additional modulators, cameras, televisions or other equipment that may be needed in the schools should be purchased by the school districts. This offer is good until September 1, 1993. PRESENTATION TO SWSCC AND SWSCC'S RECOMMENDATIONS TO MEMBER CITIES SWING presented their report and recommendations to the SWSCC Operating Committee and Full Commission in the Fall of 1988. The Full Commission, at their meeting on September 7, 1988, accepted SWING's first two recommendations and decided to amend the third recommendation concerning funding due to the fact that all institutional users benefit from the enhancement made to the subscriber network. It is not only a benefit to school districts, but also to the individual cities, as the doubling of capacity will permit the cablecasting of two live programs simultaneously from an individual city which has become of concern to the Member Cities. The SWSCC's recommendations to the Member Cities are as follows: 1) The requirement to build an I-net in the SW franchise area should be deferred for a minimum of five years or until such time as a sizable base of institutional users is identified and secured to finance the capital expense without cable subscriber subsidy. )Z9,7 I-net Report September 16, 1988 Page 5 2) Future study of the telecommunications market and economic feasibility of the I-net should be at the Commission's discretion. 3) The SWSCC recommends that the enhancement of the residential network be implemented in a 50% cost share between the SWSCC and the cable company of the $35,321 amount. The Commission, by contributing $17,660.50, is making sure the enhancement is begun prior to transfer of the system and completed shortly thereafter as the ordering of equipment allows. In order to recoup some of the cost in the future from the school districts, requests for channel time on the government and public access channel will be negotiated at a cost to the school districts. The Commission recommends approval by Member Cities of its three recommendations, along with an authorization for the SWSCC to pay the $17,660.50 out of the relief settlement proceeds to be received from Rogers, contemplating future action by the city council on the settlement offer. If, for some reason, Member Cities do not approve the settlement offer of Rogers at an upcoming meeting, the enhancement will oe paid in a proportionate amount out of city franchise fees. The SWSCC urges your acceptance of their recommendations, with the Commission's cash contribution to the project in order that the enhancement can proceed in a timely manner. Rogers Cablesystems has committed to completing the project as soon aF all five Member Cities approve the Commission's recommendations. SW2 9/16/88 22:2A ;,' CITY OF EDEN PRAIR HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINN RESOLUTION NO. 88-2 �)( 2,z,4b'2Z4Z BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the f the following persons have agreed to serve as appointed for the General Election to be held PRECINCT 1A KING OF GLORY LUTHER, 17850—Uuck Lake Trai Janet Dahlke 6961 Ticonderoga Tra Loretta Ellison 16920 South Shore La' Karen Hackman 18212 Valley View Roi Olive Larson 16700 Main Street, #buu ys4-RJ4 Carole Meidinger 15918 Cedar Ridge Road 937-2840 Bernice Sandness 16700 Main Street, #410 934-8207 Anne Thomas 17440 Duck Lake Trail 934-9205 JoAnn Wronski ** 6630 Tartan Curve 934-4226 PRECINCT 18 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER 16700 Valley View Road 937-8727 Judy Baker ** 7113 Muirfield Lane 937-2153 Dolores Brown 7260 Tartan Curve 934-0848 Laverne Hales 7946 Island Road 934-1746 Anne Hawkins 18099 South Shore Lane West 934-2253 Bill Jellison 9560 Highview Drive 934-0934 Dorothy Schwartz 15051 Scenic Heights Road 937-2289 Tommy Thomas 17440 Duck Lake Trail 934-9205 PRECINCT 2 EDEN PRAIRIE ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH 16591 Duck Lake Trail 934-2327 Roberta Bronson 6236 Eden Prairie Road 934-9070 Shirley Carlon 15606 North Lund Road 934-2966 Helen Haupt ** 15709 South Lund Road 934-9127 Allene Hookom 16741 Prairie Lane 934-2550 Delores Klein 15701 North Lund Road 934-9124 Kathleen Porta 15612 Sunset Circle 934-6634 Elaine Udstuen 12774 Gordon Drive 941-3654 PRECINCT 3 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CHURCH 17200 Valley View Road 937-9593 Tom Alberti 18241 Duck Lake Trail 934-5148 Fay Clark ** 7392 Ontario Boulevard 934-4460 Adeline Levin 6743 Hallmark Drive 937-1709 Lydia Martinson 8317 Red Rock Road 937-8787 Laurie Pennebaker 7284 Prairie View Drive 937-2623 Mary Upton 16163 Edenwood Drive 937-2938 Ethyl Wokasch 15129 Lesley Lane 937-8802 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-213 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that the following persons have agreed to serve as elections judges and are appointed for the General Election to be held on November 8, 1988. PRECINCT IA KING OF GLORY LUTHERAN CHURCH 17850—Duck Lake Trail 934-1708 Janet Dahlke 6961 Ticonderoga Trail 934-4464 Loretta Ellison 16920 South Shore Lane 934-3060 Karen Hackman 18212 Valley View Road 934-9027 Olive Larson 16700 Main Street, #506 934-3234 Carole Meidinger 15918 Cedar Ridge Road 937-2840 Bernice Sandness 16700 Main Street, #410 934-8207 Anne Thomas 17440 Duck Lake Trail 934-9205 JoAnn Wronski ** 6630 Tartan Curve 934-4226 PRECINCT 18 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER 16700 Valley View Road 937-8727 Judy Baker ** 7113 Muirfield Lane 937-2153 Dolores Brown 7260 Tartan Curve 934-OB48 Laverne Hales 7946 Island Road 934-1746 Anne Hawkins 18099 South Shore Lane West 934-2253 Bill Jellison 9560 Highview Drive 934-D934 Dorothy Schwartz 15051 Scenic Heights Road 937-2289 Tommy Thomas 17440 Duck Lake Trail 934-9205 PRECINCT 2 EDEN PRAIRIE ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH T65g1 Duck Lake Trail —— 934-2327 Roberta Bronson 6236 Eden Prairie Road 934-9070 Shirley Carlon 15606 North Lund Road 934-2966 Helen Haupt ** 15709 South Lund Road 934-9127 Allene Hookom 16741 Prairie Lane 934-2550 Delores Klein 157D1 North Lund Road 934-9124 Kathleen Porta 15612 Sunset Circle 934-6634 Elaine Udstuen 12774 Gordon Drive 941-3654 PRECINCT 3 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CHURCH 17200 Valley View Road 937-9593 Tom Alberti 18241 Duck Lake Trail 934-5148 Fay Clark ** 7392 Ontario Boulevard 934-4460 Adeline Levin 6743 Hallmark Drive 937-1709 Lydia Martinson 8317 Red Rock Road 937-8787 Laurie Pennebaker 7284 Prairie View Drive 937-2623 Mary Upton 16163 Edenwood Drive 937-2938 Ethyl Wokasch 15129 Lesley Lane 937-8802 PRECINCT 4 ST. ANDREW LUTHERAN CHURCH T4T00 Valley View Roar 937-2776 Priscilla Bailey 6950 Mariann Drive 937-8885 Cheryl Bridge 7272 Gerard Drive 941-8104 Gertrude Dahlberg 6319 St. John's Drive 937-1299 Elaine Jacques 9021 Riley Lake Road 934-0944 Lyle Johnston 8621 Basswood Road, #18 944-9308 Jean Lee 13231 Kerry Lane 937-1097 Ruth Mital ** 12762 Gordon Drive 944-3481 Alice Schultz 6325 St. John's Drive 937-B171 PRECINCT 5A IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH 16515 Luther Way 937-8123 Lois Campbell 635 Prairie Center Dr., #229 941-2750 Leota Hales 7946 Island Road 934-1746 Joyce Myhre ** 15011 Summerhill Drive 937-2815 Caroline Nelson 16300 Hilltop Road 937-8941 Laurina Reiff 7024 Baker Road 937-8820 Elizabeth Watson 8047 Curtis Lane 934-5707 PRECINCT 5B IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH 16515 Luther Way 937-8123 Becky Heald 7631 Ontario Boulevard 937-5457 Katharine Hendrickson 635 Prairie Center Or., #218 944-528I Shirley Jellison ** 9560 Highview Drive 934-0934 Alfred Nelson 16300 Hilltop Road 937-8941 Merrill Watson 8047 Curtis Lane 934-5707 PRECINCT 6 EDEN PRAIRIE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 15050 Scenic Heights Road 937-8781 Connie Blad 17345 Pioneer Trail 937-2841 Virginia Gartner ** 15701 Cedar Ridge Road 937-1595 Jinny Gibson 15737 North Cedar Ridge Road 937-1374 June Hanson 15711 Summit Drive 937-8278 Bernice Holasek 10020 Dell Road 934-1185 Judy Miller 7835 Eden Court 937-8653 Kay Nicholson 16201 Hilltop Road 937-I928 Marie Wittenberg 9880 Crestwood Terrace 934-0961 PRECINCT 7A NEW TESTAMENT CHURCH 12901 Roberts Drive 941-7290 Rita Anderson 14312 Fairway Drive 937-8196 Adeline Bramwell ** 14329 Fairway Drive 937-8987 Louise Doughty 13200 Roberts Drive 934-3858 Pauline Johnston 8621 Basswood Road #18 944-9308 Les LaBore 14366 Fairway Drive 937-2462 Ruth Olson 9051 East Staring Lane 937-1767 PRECINCT 78 SOUTH SUBURBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY VO-TECH 9200Flying rTiir-76—CToud Drive 944-9993 Lynn Bramwell 14328 Fairway Drive 937-8987 James Brown 11 551 Riverview Road 941-1290 Juliet Gleason 8633 Darnel Road 944-6154 David Knaak 7935 South bay Curve 934-0324 Viola McLain 14224 Chestnit Drive 937-1798 Jim Rannow ** 16316 Lincoln Lane 937-8237 Frances Schaitberger 9869 Crestwood Terrace 934-0987 Melody Villars 7616 Carnelian Lane 934-0448 PRECINCT 8 EDEN PRAIRIE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 11609 eT ona Road 941-2521 Mary Boll 8705 Westwind Circle 941-6306 Maureen Miller 11555 Carriage Court 941-8072 Marion Nesbitt 8701 Black Maple Drive 941-2387 Cheryl Petersen 6429 City West Parkway, #4213 941-9504 Carol Sheridan 8908 Neill Lake Road 944-6643 Carol Smith 11013 Anderson Lakes Pkwy, #11D 941-9D07 Walter Thompson 11325 Westwind Drive, #F 941-1288 Barb Vanderploeg ** 8735 Leeward Circle 941-5363 PRECINCT 9A PAX CHRISTI CATHOLIC CHURCH T2T00 Pioneer rai 941-3150 Leone Barta 10065 Pioneer Trail 944-1551 Bernadine Beauvais 10285 Amsden Way 941-8152 Billie Brown 10320 Balsam Lane 829-5599 Dorothy Caba 10121 Laurel Drive 941-6994 Barbara Cail ** 9205 Talus Circle 941-5140 Ann Cheatham 9236 Amsden Way 941-8592 Len Helfand 15476 Village Woods Drive 934-67D4 Nancy Little 9450 Aspen Circle 944-2437 PRECINCT 9B PAX CHRISTI CATHOLIC CHURCH 12100 Pioneer Trail 941-3150 Jeanne Brandt ** 12300 Riverview Road 941-3316 Tim Gordon 10272 Arrowwood Drive 941-8067 Cheryl Hansen 9445 Aspen Circle 941-8690 Carol Hegge 1D015 Pioneer Trail 941-27D7 Bonnie Helfand 15476 Village Woods Drive 934-67D4 Isabell Iverson 12135 Oxbow Drive 941-7465 Betty Schaitberger 12880 Pioneer Trail 941-1451 Vong Suvannarad 9595 Yorkshire Lane 941-1389 ** Indicates Head Judge ALTERNATE ELECTION JUDGES Renee Garpestad 18783 Chennault Way 937-0961 Linda Leathers 18895 Deerfield Trail 934-0142 Phil Olson 18543 Harrogate Drive 934-5353 Betty Schroedermeier 7130 Green Ridge Drive 934-3381 William Schwartz 15051 Scenic Heights Road 937-2289 ABSENTEE PRDCESSING CENTER City Hall 7600 Executive Drive 937-2262 Kent Barker 15801 Cedar Ridge Road 937-1454 Perry Anderson 9505 Highview Drive 934-0938 CITY EDEN F RAIRIE HENNEPINOCOUNTY,PMINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-231 RECORDING CONFORMANCE WITH DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR CABRIOLE CENTER (aka BACHMAN/ANDERSON DEVELOPMENT) EAS, on June 7, 8, Prairie,WHaRmunicipal corporation,97entered e5into a E. ut certain herlin (ODeveloperwner) anr'satAgrCy reement (Agreement) pertaining to that certain property referred to as CABRIOLE CENTER (aka Bachman/Anderson Development) legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and, WHEREAS, the Owner has complied with certain provisions of said Agreement as to the development of the CABRIOLE CENTER; and, WHEREAS, the City Staff has reviewed the Owner's compliance with said Agreement as to said CABRIOLE CENTER and has so advised this Council; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Eden Prairie City Council that as to CABRIOLE CENTER, the City finds the property in compliance, except for the following: "5. That the impact of the second phase of the building upon the Bloomington residents shall be mitigated using the following measures: ( "a. building should be designed to terrace from the west to the east to decrease the massing. "b. buffering and vegetation shall be introduced along the southerly and easterly ends of the second phase building and easterly edge of the parking ramp area. "12. Owner shall work with City Staff and affected Bloomington residents for review of drainage and landscaping plans to buffer the office use from the single family." BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as to all items mentioned herein. ADOPTED by the City Council on October 4, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor John 0. Frane, Clerk SEAL 224 EXHIBIT A Legal Description Cabriole Center (aka Bachman Anderson) The East 615 feet of that part of Government Lot 7 lying South of State Highway #5 in Section 13, Township 116, Range 22, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Being registered land as is evidenced by the Certificate of Title No. 546158. t OLD STATE Hwy NO. 5 e WEST 78`^ST. •, 5 5t30 le 37'W 50 _ ;I _ - _ .-. ' ' ,-, ," 1\ 5:, H // it, 1 ,`/�� � Y t -1` L k ppPCL� 1 �� *n o liar �25 / iW 31 ,o 7gi'ol Area of /f e ,; n om i ^0 9 l Jp /�' / • v o NI ii N.y I -. °--- // ..- ' 0- no %I \ \ - . /'- ,‘,20 it'0,\1-c).-",/.---- ' U. '.'”' '-- /' / 1 q/ 0,7,, • ..„,:.. , .0 ,, „, ,N _ , 4 . . ,-,.. , _ ,z ,,, .. a 1 Q J 'µc7 Q1. Nm ! r+p n fin l „0,ens I(I I�r� •Dend<, I.'n Monument I A v SGi i I ` mY, ...., n� . O Lc I n V-,__ `1 N� ! ° � ���16°bo� �e"�N�, I IOo A 4" 5 e''.3°W-bB41. tY J \ Liz lI - a, =a.. Kenn Co.Monument e M.C. ANDER50N LAKE_ \ • A5 LOCATED in/ APR/L,/973 ar.,1.f.`i L CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-232 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR FAIRFIELD ADDITION WHEREAS, the proposed sanitary_sewer to be constructed in FAIRFIELD ADDITION requires a connection to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commisssion (MWCC) interceptor system; and WHEREAS, the proposed connection conforms to the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Sewer Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to submit an application for "Permit for Connection to or Use of Commission Facilities" to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on OCTOBER 4, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-233 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO APPLY FOR AND EXECUTE DEPARTMENT DF NATURAL RESOURCES LICENSE TO CROSS PUBLIC WATERS WITH A SANITARY SEWER IN APLINE ESTATES ACRES 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, the proposed sanitary sewer to be constructed in ALPINE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION requires crossing of an area designated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as protected wetlands; and WHEREAS, a license from the Department of Natural Resources is necessary to authorize this crossing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: A. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to submit an application for license to cross public water: and execute said license when processed. ADOPTED by the City Council on October 4, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 2ull Pannekoeken Huis on Lake Idlewild CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-229 A RESOLUTION DENYING SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE #33-88 FOR THE PROPOSED PANNEKOEKEN HUIS DEVELOPMENT ON LAKE IDLEWILD WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 33-88, authorizing first reading of a rezoning of property for the proposed Pannekoeken Huis on Lake Idlewild development by Marco Construction did receive first reading by the City Council at a regular meeting on August 9, 1988; and; WHEREAS, Marco Construction, proponents for the development of Pannekoeken Huis on Lake Idlewild, have submitted to the City, in writing, notification that they will not be proceeding with development of the property as was reviewed by the City at the time of said first reading; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that second reading of Ordinance #33-88 is hereby denied and that the attendant request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office to Regional Commercial on 1.24 acres for the Pannekoeken Huis on Lake Idlewild by Marco Construction, is also hereby denied. ADOPTED by the City Council on October 4, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-218 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 20th day of September, 1988, fixed the 4th day of October, 1988 as the date for a public hearing on the following proposed improvements: I.C. 52-147 - Watermain extension on Eden Prairie Road (CSAH 4) and Pioneer Trail (CSAH 1). WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the Council hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held on the 4th day of October, 1988 at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 2. The City Engineer is hereby designed as the Engineer for this project with the assistance of H.T.P.O., consulting engineers. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on October 4, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk . t . - •'.1.! ‘, , ., 1 1 , , -',I 1 c) ,, a .,. . -. . c••' ,. , .. , o ... . . LC ,, \: H ). \1 ) a '\.)• • 0 AID • a • .1. i.,) , 0 : • . ; l , .AI' ; • I •'• • ; • k . I , 4 .. • .0 ...-‘: oft •! ' . .. ,.) i ' of I •,, - .,, 1 'o 1 r • ' 0 0 4.4, . , Flt.,'S I, ,62 1 i - , . . , 00 0 0! .1 oo, . -' C3 11,600' - •k, . "to'l , • , -• '.'1' •, v 0,..• .& ,, , •, - • 0..•d' : : • , le \) a°ca , '42 C, '• 4,,)C'S.•0 : . ' a:1 1 0 . k . . ii. , . , c,,,,,..• , I,\ ,l. .. 'IL) ✓ ._ • 1 •'No. .' 1 )Hte ' . kJ Cog t , it •,' . I ' ) ofo 0 • / 0* 0, •: 0 • 11. - V sq".i. - , , , • Ilij, . . 000 f , , -• i 1 , 't 0 .. •. 0 0• • ,. O. .' Co•:, .'' 4° ' ' • ,,,:; , 0.1 '!"-- °, 6, .2) - P : 1 o0 • 1 :, r• . r . . f . ' dr 0 1 ,....0 0 1 - • ,,, ...1 0• ,1 ', : ‘41 004-J •• ',. ,... .1 . 0 . .. 11 . 0 . 0 . 0 C0ao• °40" a '- 1 * .•, :. . o .• , 1 . .... . . 17:':. : . :4, l• , ( ' . CAMERA OPERATOR'S CERTIFICATE • I hereby certify that the microphotographs appearing on this roll of film are true, accurate, and complete copies of the original records described below. Reproductions intended to serve as permanent records comply with standards established by the Minnesota I historical Society. • • • AGENCY OF ORIGIN: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • RECORD SERIES: COUNCIL. PACKETS INCLUSIVE DATES/NOS: JANUARY 1977 - DECEMBER 1991 ROLL Is •• BEGINS WITH: JANUARY 1988 EN DS W I I I: SEPTEMBER 1988. 2/9/94 �(f/� A vv _ DATE CAMERA OPFRAT( 2'S S GNATURE CAB CONCEPT MICRO IMAGING MINNETON/cif MN PRODUCING LABORATORY CITY/STATE • AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY CDUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, OCTDBER 4, 1988 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7600 Executive Dirve COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Franey Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Deb Edlund PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE RDLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. MINUTES A. Joint City Council, Historical & Cultural Commission, and Page 2203 Restoration Committee meeting held Tuesday, July 19, 198E ( III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List Page 2211 B. Review Bids for Community Center Tile Project Page 2212 C. Change Order No. 5,. Wellhouse Construction, I.C. 52-072B Page 2216 D. Grading Permit for Starring Lake 2nd Addition (CSAH 1� west of Page 2220 Staring Lane) E. Grading Permit for Chestnut Place (northwest corner of Page 2221. Anderson Lakes Parkway and Chestnut Drive) F. Resolution approving Joint Agreement to develop I-494 Page 2222 Environmental Impact Statement (Resolution No. 88-2f9) G. CHEYENNE PLACE, by Westar Properties, Inc. 2nd Reading of Page 2223 Ordinance #41-88-PUD-12-88, Planned Unit Development District Review, with waivers, and Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 38.27 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Cheyenne Place; and Adoption of Resolution #88-221, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #41-88-PUD-12-88, and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 38.27 acres into 76 single family lots, 6 outlots, and road right-of-way. Location: North of County Road #1, 640 feet west of County Road #4 and County Road #1 intersection. (Ordinance #41-88-PUD-12-88, PUD District & Rezoning; Resolution #88-221, Authorizing Summary and Publication) H. Request from Southwest Cable Commission for Approval of SWING Page 2233 recommendation regarding Institutional Network City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,October 4, 1988 I. Resolution No. 88-213 Appointing Election Judges for the November Page 2240 8 General Election J. Resolution No. 88-231, Recording Partial Compliance with Page 2243 Developer's A reement Requirements for Bachman Anderson Development aka Cabriole Center) K. Resolution No. 8B-232, Authorizing Permit Application for Page 2245 Fairfield L. Resolution No. 88-233 to Execute License to Cross Public Page 2246 Waters with Sanitary Sewer in Alpine Estates 2nd Addition M. PANNEKOKEKEN HUTS, Resolution No. 88-229 Denying 2nd Reading Page 2247 of Ordinance No. 33-88 from Office to C-Reg-Service IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Trunk Watermain Extension on Pioneer Trail (CSAH 1) from Page 2248 1700 feet west of Mitchell Road to approximately 200 feet west of Eden Prairie Road (CSAH 41 and on Eden Prairie Road ( SAH 11 from Pioneer Trail (CSAH 11 to 600 feet north of Scenic Heights Road, I.C. 52-147 (Resolution No. 88-2i87— B. REDBURN BUILDING by Bud Redburn Insurance Agency, Inc. Request Page 2249 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Industrial to Neighborhood Commercial on 1.5 acres and from Industrial to Office on 0.58 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 0.58 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 2.33 acres into 2 lots and road right-of-way for construction of a 3,000 square foot office building. Location: East of Terrey Pine Drive, south of Highway #5, east of Burger King. (Resolution #88-223, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; Ordinance #45-88, Rezoning; Resolution #88-224, Preliminary Plat) C. PRAIRIEVIEW II by Curt Johnson Properties, Inc. Request for Page 2256 Zoning District Amendment within the C-Regional Service Zoning District on 2.17 acres for construction of a 12,658 square foot retail/office use. Location: North of Plaza Drive, east of the Prairie View Shopping Center. (Ordinance #43-8B, Rezoning) D. WYNDHAM NOB 2ND ADDITION by Burl Corporation. Request for Page 2262 Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 on 7.2 acres and from Rural to R1-13.5 on 18.9 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, and Preliminary Plat of 27.2 acres into 41 single family lots, 3 outlots, and road right-of-way. Location: South of Townline Road, east of Chennault Way within Hidden Glen 3rd Addition. (Ordinance #46-88, Rezoning; Resolution #88-225, Preliminary Plat) E. CROSSTOWN PRAIRIE OFFICE WAREHOUSE by Gary A. Hilden. Request Page 2272 for Site Plan Rcview on 1.89 acres within the I-2 Zoning District with variances and Shoreland variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Preliminary Plat of 1.89 acres into one lot and road right-of-way for construction of a 19,216 square foot office warehouse. Location: South of County Road 67, east of Nine Mile Creek, north of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad. (Ordinance #47-88, Zoning District Amendment within I-2; Resolution #88-226, Preliminary Plat) City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,October 4, 1988 F. BLUESTEM 5TH AI/ITION by Brown Land Company. Request for PUI Page 2281 Concept Review on 15.92 acres, PUI District Review on 15.92 acres with waivers, Zoning District Amendment within the R1-13.5 Zoning District on 2.26 acres and Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 10.57 acres, Preliminary Plat of 12.83 acres into 15 single family lots, 3 outlots, and road right-of-way. Location: West of Bluestem Lane, north of Purgatory Creek. (Resolution #88-227, PUI Concept for Bluestem 5th Addition; Ordinance #48-88-PUI-13-88, PUI District, Zoning District Amendment within R1-13.5 District and Rezoning; Resolution #88-228, Preliminary Plat) G. Vacation 88-08, Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements in Page 2293 Forest Knolls (Resolution No. 88-215) H. Vacation 88-09, Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements in Page 2294 Coachman's Landing 5th Addition (Resolution No. 08-216) V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Page 2295 VI. ORDINANCES b RFSOLUTIONS VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Request for City Approval of Charitable Gambling License from Pago. 2096 the Hockey Association of Eden Prairie (Continued from 9/21/88) & 2296 B. Communication from Marc and JoAnn Syverson requesting Screening Page 2297 from Old Franlo Road C. Request for Liquor License for Ciatti's Italian Restaurant VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS IX. APPOINTMENTS X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members B. Report of City Manager 1. City Budget Review (Resolution No. 01-231) Page 2299 Continued from 9/14/88 2. Funding Request from Association of Metropolitan Page 2321 Municipalities 3. Recommendation on Financial Consultants for the Cif Page 2327 of Eden Prairie C. Report of City Attorney D. Report of Director of Planning City Council Agenda - 4 - Tues.,October 4, 1988 E. Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources 1. Petition from Residents Along. Duck Lake Trail to Eliminate Page 2328 a Portion of the Hikeway/Bike Path F. Report of Director of Public Works 1. Approve Plans and Specifications and Order Advertisement Page 2333 for Bids, I.C.. 52-147, Eden Prairie Road and Pioneer Trail Trunk Watermain Extension Project (Resolution No. 88-2 7 2. Prairie View Drive Sod Restoration G. Report of Finance Director IX. NEW BUSINESS X. ADJOURNMENT { JOINT MEETING EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION RESTORATION COMMITTEE UNAPPROVED MINUTES TUESDAY, JULY 19, 1988 !'M COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gary D. Peterson, Mayor; Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION: Gwen Barker, Philip Rohler, co- chairs; John Hensrud, Thomas Howden, Laurie Koering, Richard Schuette, Stephen White RESTORATION COMMITTEE: Mona Leppla, chairperson; Jim Brown, Frank Cardarelle, John Hensrud, Don Johnson, Coralyn Koschinska, Karen Norman, John Rogers, Stephen White, Marie Wittenberg CITY STAFF: Carl Jullie, City Manager; Craig Dawson, Assistant to the City Manager; Robert Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources; Sandra F. Werts, Recreation Supervisor; Deb Edlund, Recording Secretary I. CALL TO ORDER I I. INTRODUCTi3ONS. III. BACKGROUND & UPDATE OF CUMMINS_GRILL HOMESTEAD John Hensrud introduced the project, its development concept and the restoration objectives. Hensrud described the homestead as a location to be used for education, a place to display turn-of-the-century skills, and a place for people to gather. Hensrud said the committees would like this to be a year round facility, showing all the seasons. He said that they would encourage residents to volunteer. Hensrud said the committees would like to provide guided tours of the farm house. Coralyn Koschinska stated that in 1979 the City Council had approved the hiring of Miller Dunwiddie Architects, Inc. to complete a feasibility study for the restoration of the Cummins-Grill Homestead and had been the basis on City Council Minutes 2 July 19, 1988 which restoration plans have been made. Koschinska said that the Restoration Committee had been in existence for 6 years and presented the restoration accomplishments thus far. She said that in 1985 the last grant was received. Bentley asked if the Committee knew how much it had cost to build the house originally. Koschinska replied that the estimate was less than $3,000. Koschinska reported that the house had been occupied since 1979. She said the renter had given notice of vacancy and believed that now was the time to leave the house vacant and not hamper the restoration efforts. Koschinska explained that access to the house had been on a limited basis and that even on Sunbonnet Days there was only access to one room of the house. Koschinska said that by having the house vacant programs could be run at the home. Koschinska explained that because the building was isolated there was a need for a security system and good exterior lighting. Koschinska reported the immediate maintenance needs to be repair the roof vents, restoration of original porches, and additional tuck pointing. She added that other needs were basement windows and repair of the interior of the house. Harris question if the security system would connect to the police department. Steve White replied that the cost did include a connection, but not to the police. Bentley said then that the Committee was looking for $15,000 to secure the building and stop the leaking in the roof. Werts said that the roof was leaking only around the vents that were not properly install. Pidcock asked if the committee could go back to the roofer to make repairs, considering that it had not been done that long ago. Bentley said that this could be possible, but it could take years, if it was taken as far as the courts. Werts replied that they certainly would try to get the roofer to come back and repair the roof. Peterson said that this could be a very minor expense. Koschinska said that the committees wanted to develop programs to be run at the house, but believed to accomplish this a permanent employee would be necessary. She said this person would be adequately trained to develop programs, train staff, recruit volunteers and to be at the home on a day to day basis to supervise repairs and restoration. Koschinska explained that there was also day to day maintenance and utilities needed. :She said that the Committees were looking for a commitment from the City Council to make a commitment to fund the hiring of 2__0/ City Council Minutes 3 July 19, 1988 the curator and the basic maintenance at an approximate cost of $17,000 per year. Peterson asked what was included in the programs. Werts explained that wages, instruction, operating supplies, recreation equipment, electric, gas, etc. were all included in the $60,300. Pidcock asked why the house was being restored to 1910 when it was built in 1880. Koschinska replied that in 1910 the kitchen had been added, to restore to 1880 the kitchen would have to be taken off, would have to estimate what type of building was there in 1880, which would cost more than the current project. Koschinska stated that besides the immediate maintenance needs, there would be long range needs as well. Peterson suggested that the long-range needs be projected into the annual budget. Harris asked if the Committee could foresee charging small fees for the programs. Koschinska explained that there could be small charges for programs; however, the Committee could not expect to fund the programs entirely from income from people going through the house. Harris said that these fees could take care of some of the smaller expenses. Werts explained that the committees were trying to present the costs as honestly as possible. Peterson said that previous Councils had made a commitment for the restoration and preservation of the house and he would like to see this to continue; however, he was not sure that a specific dollar commitment for an extended period of time was necessary. Hensrud explained the restoration program. He said that the exterior work would be done first. He believed that the restoration of the original porches would add to the building. Hensrud said that the repairs to the basement were essential for safety. Hensrud went on to explain that restoration costs were difficult to project because of all the unknowns and that the expertise needed in restoration work was costly. He reported the estimated costs for restoration to be $157,500 based on Foster Dunwiddie's 1979 figures. Robert Ferguson of MacDonald & Mack Partnership recommended adding a 175% inflation factor and that 20% needed to be added for architectural fees. Hensrud presented the timing projected for each phase of the project. He concluded by stating that he believed the project to be feasible. Pidcock asked what other cities the architect had projects in. Werts replied that in 1983 the Council had given permission for the Restoration Committee to interview 22. City Council Minutes 4 July 19, 1988 architects. MacDonald & Mack Partnership had projects in Philadelphia, Seattle, Minneapolis, and Hastings. Pidcock said that in the past Hennepin Vo-Tech said that they would work fox free if the materials and a master plan were furnished. She said this could reduce the costs. Werts replied that the Committee had not looked into this because restoration was a very specialized field. She said a supervisor would be necessary. Peterson said that it might be possible that the Vo-Tech could help in certain areas of the project. Hensrud said that the project was specialized, but that working with the Vo-Tech was a valid possibility. Bentley said that a recommendation to spend $250,000 or sell the house had been presented in 1981-82. He said that after many discussions the Restoration Committee was born. Bentley said that at that time the Council had decided to allow minimal spending; the refurbishing was to be done by volunteer labor and the material was to be donated. He said that fundraising had not gone well in the past. Bentley believed that the Council had to be careful about spending and suggested that the Committee do whatever could be done to cut cost, such a4 working with Vo-Tech, etc. Bentley pointed out that originally the restoration was to be a citizens effort - not a City effort. Bentley said that he understood the immediate need for a security system, but as far as long range maintenance, this should be directed to Staff and be brought up at the City Budget meeting. Pidcock asked Werts to explain who Foster Dunwiddie was and his relationship to the project. Sandy replied that Foster Dunwiddie was the original architect on the project and the firm that had prepared the feasibility study. The Restoration Committee had changed to MacDonald & Mack Partnership because of the stance the firm takes with their projects, the small size fo the firm, and the Committee would be dealing with the principals of the firm. Anderson stated that the Council in 1982 took the posture that the building had to be saved, it was hoped that residents would find ways to accomplish the restoration. He said that now the City had acquired the Douglas House and was trying to purchase the Riley House. Anderson said that now the City is not just dealing with one house but with 3 or 4, and he believed that priorities needed to be established and consideration given as to what means were available to deal with all four..He said that the original intent was for the City to keep the buildings intact, not to restore them. City Council Minutes 5 July 19, 1988 Pidcock believed that the proposed electrical updating costs were high. Werts said that the framing in the older homes is not like modern homes. Peterson asked if the Council's posture had changed regarding preservation and/or restoration and suggested that this be discussed at a separate meeting. Anderson commented that the major costs of the project were not materials but labor, and believed that the Committees needed to take a serious look at what did not take expertise, such as: electrical, plumbing, tuck pointing. He said that with this being a non-profit venture that he believed the Vo-Tech offer should be looked into. Bentley asked about the timeline for the foundation work and inquired about how badly the foundation was in need of repair. Hensrud replied that per the Dunwiddie report the posts and columns were in need of repair and a wall needed to be stabilized. Jim Brown said that the foundation was solid and was made of natural rock. He said that the foundation would not take a lot of materials or money. Brown said that the foundation needed to be sprayed with a sealant to prevent erosion, a new cellar door would be necessary, and some repair to the windows was required. Bentley said that the reason he had questioned this was because the report listed a figure of $14,700 to stabilize the foundation and he believed that to be high. Werts said that this figure was from the Dunwiddie report plus 175% inflation. Werts further commented that Ferguson had told her that it was hard to apply the inflation costs straight across the board for the whole project and that possibly this could be high. She stated that no maintenance had been done to the basement. Bentley said that it would be helpful to look at the figures based on today's costs and that a breakdown of the material and labor for each item would give a better picture for Staff to look at. Werts replied that this would require a fee for the architects' cost and recommended going to a restoration architect. It was discussed about having the Vo-Tech do the estimates and Werts commented that it did require a certain expertise to do this properly. Bentley agreed that the estimates need to be done correctly. Anderson asked City Manager Jullie if any money was presently allocated for maintenance. Jullie replied that nothing had been programmed. Anderson believed that it was important to set within the budget a maintenance allowance so that the building did not deteriorate any further; however, he said he was not sure where to go beyond that point. 2,207 City Council Minutes 6 July 19, 1988 Peterson stated that the Council needed to respond to the committees and let them know clearly that the Council would like to proceed in a new direction. He said that in a number of areas the City makes a commitment and a dollar investment in that which contributes to the quality of life of its people, such as parks, open spaces and roads. Peterson believed that it was time for the Council to take another step in the direction of restoration, so that these houses are open and usable. He said that he understood that the restoration costs money and that the money would come from tax dollars and further commented that the Council needed to be careful in spending those dollars; therefore, if there were alternatives that could possibly save money, those needed to be studied. Peterson believed that the Council should make a commitment to require the property to be vacant, provide a security and lighting system, and to authorize the necessary repairs to stabilize the building. Jim Brown said that there was a problem with liability insurance coverage for volunteers because as the house is on City property and the City owns the house, the work had to be done by City workers. Bentley believed that the insurance problem had been resolved. Jullie replied that the workers needed to be supervised. He said that possibly a special rider was necessary and he would look into the insurance matter. Harris stated that the City was entering a new phase and if the history of Eden Prairie was going to be preserved it was time to take a more aggressive stance. Harris supported the funding for security and lighting of the house. She said that since the City owned more than one house it was important for the Commission to let the Council know what would be expected for the other facilities. Gwen Barker said that the Commission believed that the City of Eden Prairie had made a statement as to the interest in restoration with the purchase of the Smith- Douglas and Riley homes. She said that the benefits were that the homes were on the existing sites and the committees had an opportunity to develop the sites as living symbols - not as museums. Barker said that the Smith-Douglas-More house was a 5-bedroom house which used to house travelers, and the Commission was looking at this house being a bed-and-breakfast facility. The Riley House was being considered as a possibility for a living farm or possibly as an art center. Barker said that the City had made the commitment to buy the property, but believed that now was the time to go a step further. Harris asked what were other possibilities for funding besides the City. Werts replied that the there was little 22U� City Council Minutes 7 July 19, 1988 or no grant money available. She said that a master plan needed to be in place before going for further grants. Werts discussed the possibilities and explained what had been done in the oast, but stated discouragement. She said that she had not gone to corporations because of not having a specific plan in place. Werts said that the Committee does get gifts and donations, but are small compared to the expenses. Harris encouraged the Committee to again investigate funding sources. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris that the Cummins-Grill Homestead be left vacant after the current renter vacates on August 1, 1988. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to authorize the expenditure of up to $7,000 to install a security system and exterior lighting system. Pidcock asked the Committee to check with the Vo-Tech to see if they could help with the lighting. Peterson said that would be an underlying request on all of the items. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to direct Staff to provide additional information for a part-time curator and the request for $50,000 over a 5-year period for the budget review process. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to direct City Manager Jullie to look into specifics of attaining designation as a "certified local government". Pidcock asked for a report on the information about becoming a "certified local government". Bentley asked if the report could be presented in a month. Motion carried unanimously. Don Johnson believed that the City was moving in the right direction and that more people would now be able to enjoy the house. He said the house needed to be used and believed that the part-time curator position was necessary. Johnson said that the Commission and Committee would be watching the costs carefully • . ao9 City Council Minutes 8 July 19, 1988 { Pidcock thanked the Restoration Committee and Commission for their work. Bentley commended the organizations for the well put together presentation. Meeting adjourned at 7:25PM. 2. 10 I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST October 4, 1988 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) PLUMBING M. Bakke, Inc. Barnes Plumbing Co., Inc. New American Homes Corp. Janecky Plumbing Meier Plumbing Minnesota Mechanical, Inc. CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY) Moundsview Plumbing Southwest Plumbing Aspen Realty, Inc. Chanhassen Kitchen & Bath Character Builders, Inc. HEATING & VENTILATING Harju Construction, Inc. Johnson & Johnson Building, Inc. BSC Mechanical Kingsview Builders, Inc. Cherokee Refrigeration, Inc. Kuiper Specialties Twin City Temperature Control, Inc. Mosiman Construction Company Wonderful World of Pets GAS FITTER Unique Air, Inc. These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. Pat So ie Licensing 22I/ MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources DATE: September 28, 1988 SUBJECT: Bids for Community Center Tile Project The 1983 budget included $20,000 for tiling the Community Center pool deck. Earlier this year, the City authorized obtaining bids for tiling the Community Center deck and the men's and women's locker room floors. Staff had an estimate for $24,000 for this project. During the design period, the Community Center maintenance staff had requested that the tile project include a 4" tile base around the deck for maintenance purposes and to include tiling a portion of two of the locker room walls (again for ease of maintaining a sanitary condition in the locker rooms). The architect indicated these two changes would add some additional cost to the project, but not a significant amount. Dn Tuesday, September 27, 1988, at 2 P.M., the City opened bids for this project. The City received one bid from Land of Lakes Tile Company for $42,390 and a deduct of $3,950 if only the deck were tiled and the locker rooms were deleted. Shortly before the bid opening, staff received calls from two different tile contractors who indicated they were under the understanding that they could call in a bid prior to 2 P. M. and follow-up with a written bid. Both contractors indicated that, as tile contractors, they are generally the subcontractor and as such they wait for a general contractor to contact them to provid2 a bid. Neither contractor realized that we were obtaining bids directly from tile contractors and they were required to obtain bid documents from the architect. The architect has indicated that they called the four major tile contractors each on three different occasions reminding them of this situation; however, only one tile contractor actually took the time to pick up the bids and submit the proper documents. This situation is extremely frustrating to the staff as we have already caused a great inconvenience to the general public by cancelling one session of the swim lessons and by requiring the Boy's Swim Team to find an alternative swimming site for three weeks during this proposed construction season; however, due to the significantly higher cost than projected and the fact that we received only one bid when we are aware of at least two additional large contractors that are interested in the project, staff would recommend rejecting this bid and authorizing staff to rebid this project. A rebid may not produce any significant reduction in cost; however, having a project come in so high over cost estimates and with only one bidder, staff recommends attempting to get additional bids to insure a fair price for this project. The bidder had the following breakdown for costs: $22,000 pool deck tile - 1987 estimate 3,900 locker room tile - 1987 estimate $25,900 1987 estimate $2,500 (10% increase for 1 year since 1987 estimate) $3,200 base around deck 600 patch locker room floor after adding floor drains 700 wall tile in rocker room 3,700 new tile border around pool (to make tile floor flush with pool edge) 1,500 wet grinding system (to insure no dust, etc. in pool water) 500 tile & drain pitch (to insure tile is flush with floor drains on pool deck 3,000 bond, insurance and administration costs $41 1 new total with changes Due to the inability to meet the projected closing of the pool for late November/early December, staff recommends that this project be delayed until 1989. The $20,000 budgeted in 1988 would go to the General Fund. An authorization of $42,000 should be included in the 1989 budget and would be funded with an additional $22,000 from the General Fund balance. ( BL:mdd (;E:iii.Ml TILE QUARRY TILE I ANI) CI: '���`�=� MARBLE and SLATE iII.I= CO. =V� RESIDENTIAL and COMMERCIAL INSTALLATION 5215 W.BROADWAY • MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55429 • 612/537 5111 September 27, 1988 BID TO: City of Eden Prairie Director of Community Services 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677 BID FROM: Land Of Lakes Tile Co. 5215 W. Broadway Minneapolis, MN 55429 The undersigned proposes to furnish labor, materials and equipment required for construction of 1988 Natatorium Remodeling to Eden Prairie Community Center ' Eden Prairie, Minnesota in accordance with Project Manual dated September 1, 1988, Drawings mentioned therein and subsequent addenda thereto, as prepared by Setter, Leach & Lindstrom, Inc., Architects, Engineers and Planners, 1011 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55403, for consideration of following amount: BASE BID Forty-two thousand three hundred ninety and no/100----Dollars ($42,390.00). Alternate No. 1: Deduct the sum of Three thousand nine hundred fifty and no/100 Dolalrs ($3,950.00) Attached hereto is Certified Check in the amount of Two thousand one hundred twenty and no/100 dollars ($2,120.00). We agree to abide by the Instructions to Bidders regarding disposition of Bid Security. We have examined Bidding and Contract Information, Technical Specifications and Drawings and have examined site of proposed work. We agree, if this bid is accepted, to execute a lump sum contract for the work and will furnish performance and materials payment bond in full amount of contract issued by State Surety Company of Des Moines. Page 1 of 2 Lly BID TO: City Of Eden Prairie BID FROM: Land Of Lakes Tile Co. BID FOR: 1988 Natatorium Remodeling to Eden Prairie Community Center We have sufficient personnel and equipment and have verified material availa- bility and agree to complete work on or before December 22, 1988 Owner reserves right to reject bids and to waive irregularities therein. It is agreed this bid may not be withdrawn for a period of forty-five (45) calendar days after day and hour bids are due. In event that additions to Contract are ordered by Owner, Following percent- ages of actual cost of additions shall be added to compensate Contractor for overhead and profit: 15% for work performed by Contractor's own employees. 10% for work performed by a Subcontractor. If Owner orders reductions, deletions or omissions from Contract, following percentages of actual cost of reductions, deletions or omissions shall be included as further reducing the Contract amount to compensate for Contractor's overhead and profit not applicable to the Project: 107 for work deducted from work performed by Contractor's own employees. 57 for work deducted from work performed by a Subcontractor. ADDENDUM RECEIPT Receipt of the following addenda is acknowledged: Addendum No. NONE Date LAND OF LAKES ILE CO. By:- Si Brannan Sec/Treas. 5215 West Broadway, Minneapolis, MN 55429 Page 2 of 2 • 2215 11 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA WATER WORKS IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 52-O72B CONTRACT NO. 2 WATER SUPPLY IMPROVEMENTS SECTION II - WELL HOUSES AND SITE WORK CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 I. SCOPE This Change Order No. 5 will adjust the Contract price to account for the revised engine cooling water discharge at Well No. 7 and a structurally supported slab for the transformer at Well No. 10. II. CHANGE ORDER ITEMS A. REVISED ENGINE COOLING WATER DISCHARGE AT WELL NO. 7 The engine cooling water discharge at Well No. 7 shall be revised to direct the discharge to Purgatory Creek. The revised discharge shall be in accordance with attached figures C05-1 and C05-2. B. TRANSFORMER SUPPORT SLAB AT WELL NO. 10 A structurally supported slab shall be provided for sup the electrical power transformer at Well No. The slab bt of be constructed in accordance with Black & Veatcch'sletterdasha tedl June 21, 1988 and the attached sketches. III. CHANGES IN CONTRACT AMOUNT Adjustments to the Contract price resulting from the aforementioned items shall be the following negotiated lump sum prices: Item Amount A. Revised Cooling Water Discharge at Well No. 7 $ 7,719.00 B. Transformer Support Slab at Well No. 10 Total - Change Order No. 5 8- ---00 $16,168.00 The net change to g the Contract price is summarized as follows: Current Contract Price Change Order No. 5 $1,667,522.50 16,168.00 New Contract Price $1,683,690.50 A2ASO91288 C05-1 22.I(D ( IV. ACCEPTANCE The changes and conditions set forth in this Change Order No. 5 are hereby accepted. All other provisions of the Contract, including Contract time, remain unchanged. BARBAROSSA AND SONS, INC. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA (Contractor) (Owner) By By /� Director of Public Works Date 9- ' '$ 5 Date A2AS091288 C05-2 2 20 ____„......._ Q w f 4` o w ( V, h- w o i-W W g ww u 0 O r o: z¢ z W b 20 ww ;' w 3 . / ¢-J z / / /j ¢a wo ay �0 / wCC w //i Ow Z till- F. J _/! i\_// / w / :ri r a IN...._,, l =: z ~`aI , u / K Z �E �O I Q �� O -- --j— 1 - ti b `v a v o a /� o VC? w 1 %a8 r cn 4 I / ~ l`�/ Z I I I J , v 3 3 ` a o a � g� I e v`o a • • ti N a 00 4J 1 2 L I? i , 6 floe gate — Provide 3`-dR410v O w \� pip' nap .-, m EI.8 39.0 k se/2„ =G'ION I 16° 3` C7 ?ipmp I ‘ i . (o'PVC Coo/in9 wafer iliac»urge y. El.639.70 of head wall NCfe: .S0055 beodwall .`:o be /i'eld located .5y Engineer ('LAN ci DISCHARGE HEADWALL A -5Cv le.3/Br=1'_Ou COS—I I BLACK &VEATCH EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA ENGINEERS•ARCHIT WATER SUPPLY IMPROVEMENTS DATE MAY 13,1988 • t PROJECT WELL HOUSE NO.7 � 12106.CPS ENGINE COOLING WATER-DISCHARGE FIGURE C05-2 2219 1 - MEMORANDUM - TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician } • • DATE: September 29, 1988 RE: Grading Permit for Starring Lake 2nd Addition The Developers, Scenic Heights Investment, have requested City Council approval of their request of an early grading permit for site grading on Starring Lake 2nd Addition. The project is located north of Pioneer Trail between Sunrise Circle and Starring Lane in the south half of Section 21. This request comes prior to Council 2nd Reading of the zoning ordinance in an effort by the developer to construct this project prior to winter freeze up. This proposal is consistent with previous plans approved through the Planning Commission and City Council levels. The Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District has reviewed this plan and issued their appropriate permit for grading. Recommend City Council approval of the Developer's request for grading permit subject to installation of erosion control as shown on attached plans, installation of tree protection around trees meant to be saved and the standard requirements for land alterations per City Code. JJ:ss Attachments 2220 F i - MEMORANDUM - TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician. DATE: September 29, 1988 RE: Grading Permit for Chestnut Place Chestnut Place Partners have requested City Council approval of their request for an early grading permit to commence site grading at the proposed Chestnut Place. Chestnut Place is a proposed neighborhood commercial center located at the northwest corner of Chestnut Drive and Anderson Lakes Parkway. This request comes between the 1st and 2nd Reading of the zoning ordinance and is meant to allow the Developer an early start in his site preparation work, consisting of soils corrections and overall site grading. This site is heavily vegetated with small trees and shrubs not considered significant within Eden Prairie's tree replacement policy. This vegetation would be removed with the development of the site and be replaced by landscape materials consistent with City Code. The site plan has been reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council in a preliminary way, and this request is consistent with that site plan. Recommend approval of Chestnut Place Partners request for early grading permit subject to installation of erosion control and the standard requirements for land alternation as per City Code. JJ:ss 1 222/ } CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-2I9 RESOLUTION REGARDING PROPOSED AGREEMENT NUMBER 64723 AGREEMENT FOR INTERSTATE I-494 EIS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie is the official governing body of the City of Eden Prairie; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council in cooperation with the five cities in the project area did produce a Corridor Study for 1-494, and WHEREAS, it has been determined by the City of Eden Prairie that the project development process be continued by conducting the Environmental Impact State- ment (EIS) for I-494 from the Minnesota River to the I-394 Interchange, and WHEREAS, the general objective in preparing the EIS is to help resolve uncertainty about ultimate roadway design, allow advanced rights-of-way acquisition consistent with Federal requirements, and position projects in the corridor described above to be ready to use funds when they are available, and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie will benefit from the results of the EIS and is willing to share proportionately in the cost of the preparation and completion of the EIS, and • WHEREAS, it is the expressed interest of the City of Eden Prairie to participate and cooperate in the preparation and completion of the said EIS and, WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation for the State of Minnesota has prepared an agreement for conducting and sharing the cost of preparing an environmental impact statement for expansion of Interstate 494 within the corporate limits of the City of Eden Prairie and seeks approval thereof; NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED by the City of Eden Prairie that said agreement for the preparation and payment for the I-494 environmental impact statement be and hereby are approved and that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to sign the document on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on October 4, 1988. • Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, Clerk 2 2 22 Cheyenne Place CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 41-88-PUD-12-88 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMDVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG DTHER THINGS, CDNTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY CDUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 12-88- R1-13.5 District (hereinafter "PUD 12-88-R1-13.5"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of October 4, 1988, entered into between Westar Properties, Inc., and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement and Supplement contain the terms and conditions of PUD 12-88-R1-13.5, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD 12-88-R1-13.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD 12-88-R1-13.5 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code, that are contained in PUD 12-88-R1-13.5, are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD 12-88-R1-13.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is, removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 12-88-R1-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph 8, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their 2za3 entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 6th day of September, 1988, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 4th day of October, 1988. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of 2a2 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION The East Half of the South West Quarter of the Northeast ' Quarter and that part of the East Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter lying North of the centerline of County Road No. 1; all in Section 20-, Township 116, Range 22, • Hennepin County, Minnesota. The 'West 40 rods of that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter lying north of County Road No. 1, Section 20, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota. • 222S Cheyenne Place DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1988, by Westar Properties, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept on 38.27 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review, with waivers, with underlying Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 38.27 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 38.27 acres into 76 single family lots, four outlots, and road right-of-way, all said 38.27 acres, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #41-88-PUD- 12-88, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: 1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the materials revised and dated August 19, 1988, reviewed and approved by the City Exhibit Council September 6 1988, as 8, subject to such changes andmodi and attached hereto herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein. 2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. Developer acknowledges that the property shall be subject to the final report and findings of the Southwest Area Study being prepared by the City. If the final report and findings of the Southwest Area Study indicate any change to the design of any of the elements, 222-(0 including, but not limited to utilities, streets, phasing, designated normal and high water mark (elevations) for the ponds, street access, eveler agrees to amend asaid rdesign oad lelement(s) and toeobtainrtapprpropey, rovalopof said amendments from the City, prior to final plat approval by the CitY. 4. Concurrent with, and as part of the final plat for the property, meveloper agrees of an ortgages, orencumbrances, OutlotseC and YD, for econservat liens,ion and park purposes, said outlots as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, and made a part hereof. 5. Prior to release by the City of the final plat, Developer agrees to execute a special assessment agreement with the City for purposes of public storm sewer construction to service the property. 6. Prior to release by the City of the final plat for the property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, and erosion control for the property. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 7. Prior to release by the City of the final plat for the property, Developer agrees to submit to the Director of Planning, and to obtain the Director's approval of a revised grading plan which provides for berming along the lots adjacent to County Road #1 and along the lots adjacent to Cedar Ridge Elementary School, all as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. 8. As part of the development of the property, Developer agrees to provide for sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer through the property to the west property line of the Cedar Lake Elementary School for connection by May 31, 1989. Said watermain service shall consist of two separate connections to the school's west boundary line to allow for a looped watermain system around the school. Developer further agrees that, if Developer decides not to proceed with development of the property, Developer will provide a utility and drainage easements and right of entry for the City to construct the utilities described above to the school through the property. 9. Developer agrees to notify the City and the Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of any grading, or tree removal, on the property. 10. Developer has submitted to the City, and obtained the City's approval of, a tree replacement plan for 211 caliper inches of trees which are planned to be removed from the property due to construction on said property as approved by City. 222'] Developer agrees to implement, or cause to be implemented, said tree replacement plan, in accordance with the Tree Preservation Policy of the City, attached hereto as Exhibit D, and made a part hereof. 11. Developer agrees to implement erosion control measures and adequate protective measures for areas to be preserved and areas where grading is not to occur, and to receive City approval of said measures. Developer agrees that said protective measures shall include, but not be limited to: A. Grading shall be confined to that area of the property within the construction limits. B. Snow fencing shall be placed at the construction limits within the wooded areas of the property prior to any grading upon the property. C. City shall perform an on-site inspection of said protective measures on the property by the City. Developer shall contact City for said inspection. Developer agrees that defects in materials and workmanship in the implementation of said measures shall then be determined by the City. D. Defects in materials or workmanship, if any, shall be corrected by Developer. Developer agrees to call City for reinspection of the implementation measures, and to receive approval by the City prior to issuance of the grading permit by the City. Approval of materials and workmanship may be subject to such conditions as the City may impose at the time of acceptance. 12. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning and receive the Director's approval of a tree inventory of those trees within 25 ft. outside of the construction area, which are not planned to be removed by construction on the property as approved by City, indicating the size, type, and location of all trees twelve (12) inches in diameter, or greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground level. 13. If any such trees are removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction area, Developer agrees that prior to issuance of any building permit for the property, Developer shall: A. Submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of a reforestation plan for all trees removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction area. Said plan shall indicate that the trees shall be replaced by similar tree species and that the trees used for reforestation shall be no less than three inches in diameter. The amount of trees to be replaced shall be determined by the Director of Planning, using a square inch per square inch basis, according to the area of the circle created by a cross sectional cut through the diameter of a 2227 tree as measured 4.5 feet above the ground. B. Prepare and submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of a written estimate of the costs of the reforestation work to be completed. C. Submit a bond, or letter of credit, guaranteeing completion of all reforestation work as approved by the Director of Planning. Developer agrees that the amount of the bond, or letter of credit, shall be i50% of the approved estimated cost of implementation of all reforestation work and shall be in such form and contain such other provisions and terms as may be required by the Director of Planning. Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the Director of Planning. 14. Concurrent with street and utility construction on the property, Developer agrees to construct, or cause to be constructed, sidewalks and trails in the following locations: A. A five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the north side of Pioneer Trail, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. B. A five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the east and north sides of Street A, to the south edge of its intersection with Street B and along the west side of Street A from its northerly intersection with Street B to the north edge of its intersection with Street F, all as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. C. A five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Street B in the following locations: Along the entire frontage of Lots 4 - 6, Block B, along the entire frontage of Outlot D, along the entire frontage of Lots 1 -11, Block 7, including the entire dimension of the cul-de-sac, and along the entire frontage of Lots 7 - 9, Block 4, all as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. D. A five-foot wide sidewalk along the east side of Street D, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. E. A five-foot wide sidewalk along the north and west sides of Street E, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. F. A five-foot wide sidewalk along the north side of Street F, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. G. An eight-foot wide bituminous trail through Outlot D, connecting Street B to the City land to the east, and a second section of eight-foot wide bituminous trail within said Outlot D, connecting the intersection of Streets A and D to the City lard and generally located along the westerly 222- � edge of the low area within Outlot D, all as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said sidewalks and trails shall he constructed according to City standards and specifications for such improvements, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 15. Prior to release of any building permit upon the property, and concurrent with utility and street construction on the property, Developer agrees to provide to the City, and to obtain the City's approval of a temporary twenty-foot wide driveway access easement for emergency vehicles only, through Lot 2, Block 4, connecting to the east boundary line of the Cedar Lake Elementary School property. Developer agrees that, concurrent with street and utility construction, Developer shall construct said driveway with a 2D ft. aggregate base, a ten foot wide paved surface, and knock-down barriers. Said driveway Developer agrees not to remove said driveway until such time as a permanent public street is constructed along the west boundary of the school land. 16. Developer and City acknowledge that Street E and Street F, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, are herein being approved for construction as temporary dead-end streets which terminate at the west boundary of the property. Developer agrees to use signage, approved by the City Engineer, to label said streets as temporary dead-ends for the information of current and future residents of the property, and for residents of adjacent properties. 17. Developer and City acknowledge that Outlots A and B, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, are remnant parcels of the property and that said outlots are not large enough for construction of housing units on the property. Developer and City acknowledge, further, that it is the intent of Developer to work with adjacent property owners to include said remnant parcels with other adjacent lands to create buildable lots which meet City Code requirements in terms of size, shape, and land use. 18. As part of Planned Unit Development #12-68, City hereby grants a waiver from the requirements of Chapter 11 to allow for lot width at the street frontage to be reduced to 70 ft. from 85 ft. for the following lots as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto: Lots 7 and 8, Block 2 Lot 6, Block 8 Lots 5 and 6, Block 9 22 50 Cheyenne Place 11 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-221 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE 41-88-PUD-12-88 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATIDN OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 41-88-PUD-12-88 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 4th day of October, 1988; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 41-88-PUD-12-88, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in ' Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Drdinance No. 41-88-PUD-12-88 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on October 4, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 223I 1 Cheyenne Place CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 41-88-PUD-12-88 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FRDM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADDPTING 8Y REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summar This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located north of County Roid—#ITwest of County Road #4, from the Rural District to the R1-13.5 District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the _ day of 1988. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.) SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION cc>11t 'I„t rho,Lid 95U N��rth1;"uI Plaza 800\Ce,1 801h tilrt•t'1 10,,,miilj,'i i,A1V'VSiil (612) 93-o-11 September 16, 1988 ("CD Mr. Carl Jullie City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Jullie: The Southwest Suburban Cable Commission (SWSCC) reviewed the study and report of the Southwest Institutional Network Group ("SWING") at the Commission meeting on September 7, 1988. As provided in the Performance Agreement of 1985, SWING was to study the economic viability of requiring the cable company to build a 166-mile institutional network in the Southwest Suburbs. The group recently completed its study, as you know, which included investigation cf both commercial and school district users' needs and possible economic support of the network. The Commission asks that you put the attached summary of the SWING process, along with the Commission's recommendations on page 4 of the attachment, on your next city council meeting agenda for review and approval. The Commission recommends acceptance of its three recommendations by your City. The request for approval includes authorization for the Commission to expend $17,660.50 out of the settlement proceeds, to match the cable company's contribution to enhance the subscriber network. As you'll recall, the enhancement of the subscriber network doubles the channel capacity for institutional users, which include all five cities and the school districts. The Commission felt that, at this point, it was critical to get the enhancement started, as Rogers Cablesystems is committed to providing it rather than to wait for a co-payment from the school districts. The Commission has taken the position that future loaning of the public and government access channels will be done on a cost basis in order to recoup some of the cost of this project from the school districts. Please understand, however, that the cities are direct beneficiaries of the enhancement as it doubles their channel capacity also--this contributed to the Commission's decision to support the project financially. Please contact Ann Mathews of my office when your council has acted on the enclosed report. The cable company is prepared �2.33 Citit', it Eden I'fairic,Iitliir,i.Ihihl ilh,Minnetonka t\Richfield Mr. Carl Jullie September 16, 1988 Page 2 to order the equipment once all five cities have passed the three recommendations of the Commission. If you have any questions concerning this material, please call either Ann or myself. Very truly yours, Adrian E. Herbst SW2/kd Enclosures cc: Debra S. Cottone 223y SUMMARY OF THE SOUTHWEST INSTITUTIONAL NETWORK GROUP'S STUDY OF THE VIABILITY OF THE INSTITUTIONAL NETWORK IN THE SOUTHWEST SUBURBS During relief negotiations with Rogers Cablesystems, Inc., in 1985, the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission (SWSCC) agreed to temporarily relieve Rogers of their obligation to provide a 166-mile institutional network throughout the Southwest suburbs providing 472 chdr.ncis for video, voice and data transmission. The relief of this obligation was hinged on the formation of a study group to evaluate the viability of such a network in the area. The Performance Agreement of 1985 set out guidelines for the establishment of the study group, along with membership guidelines and the parameters of their study and report. In the Spring of 1987, the SWSCC and Rogers sought representatives from the community to serve on the study group named the Southwest Institutional Network Group ("SWING"). SWING was made up of four appointees selected by the Commission and four appointees selected by Rogers. The Chairperson was named by the Cable Commission. The membership was made up of representatives from the cable industry, telecommunications industry and the school district. It was staffed by both the Commission and Rogers. SWING began their study in August 1987 by reviewing the original franchise provisions, along with the structure of the institutional network and its applications. A large part of their charge involved assessment of the financial viability of building such a network. Therefore, SWING initially reviewed potential uses by area businesses and followed a process of meeting with and surveying Eden Prairie businesses on their voice, data and video transmission needs over the next five or so years. Eden Prairie was chosen due to its density of new businesses. Twenty-nine area businesses and institutions were contacted to attend an informational meeting on January 21, 1988, and were sent a survey to complete on their technology needs. Ten people representing nine organizations attended the informational session. Eight organizations returned a completed survey. The survey and presentation to interested businesses did not prove fruitful in demonstrating backing for such a network. At the SWING meeting in March 1988, a member of SWING who is also a member of the Educational Cable Coordinating Committee (ECCC), requested that a separate process be used to review institutional uses within the school districts before SWING made its recommendations to the Cable Commission. I-net Report September 16, 1988 Page 2 In response to this request, SWING developed a needs assessment survey and distributed it to the ECCC representative from each of the five school districts, Hennepin County Library and Intermediate District 287. The survey requested projected uses of the technology for the years 1988-1995. The three-month process of SWING's staff working with the ECCC to assess their specific needs resulted in a joint presentation put together by Rogers Cablesystems and the ECCC to explain uses of the technology, associated options, and costs of providing such services to the SW school superintendents and SWING. Two of the six involved school superintendents attended the presentation, although all had originally indicated an interest in attending on May 24, 1938. All representatives from the ECCC attended the presentation except the representative from the Hennepin County Library. The joint presentation included a description of the schools' need of the interactive classroom technology, along with an outline by Rogers of two options for meeting those needs. The first option involved expansion of the subscriber network to double the current capacity to all school institutions at a cost of $35,321. The second option, which had greater long-term use but limited the users to eight secondary schools, was a mini I- net at a cost of $643,691. Discussion occurred concerning variations of the options, as well as to compare the cable options with Northwestern Bell's recent proposal to the school districts. The SWING committee convened two more times to develop their recommendations to the SWSCC based on their consideration of the viability of an institutional network. Their evaluation was based on a study of the applications of the technology, as well as potential interest in the technology by revenue-generating users, as well as nonrevenue-generating users. SUMMARY OF SWING'S FINDINGS The Committee recognizes the unique limitations of coaxial cable I-net applications and the attendant marketing challenges. The following findings have been developed as a result of our study of the technology and economic feasibility of building and marketing an I-net in the SW franchise area: o The I-net applications discussed in the company's original proposal and included in the 1981 franchise document are a�L, J I-net Report September 16, 1988 Page 3 largely obsolete. Some of the technologies were never developed as originally conceived. o Some telecommunications needs are better served by alternative technologies which offer greater capacity, incLedsed transmission speed and eliminate geographical limitations. o A survey of targeted Eden Prairie businesses and government agencies indicated minimal interest in the I-net and an unlikely near-term market among potential revenue-generating users. o There exists a strong interest among members of the Educational Cable Coordinating Committee to cablecast interactive classroom programming on a mini I-net connecting SW schools. However, among school district superintendents, there is no demonstrated commitment for capacity beyond that which may be provided on the residential network. o The Committee has been unable to identify any revenue- generating institutional users, either public or private, to support the building of an I-net. If the I-net were built today, it would be wholly-subsidized by the residential subscriber who would not realize any benefit to the residential network. The Committee, therefore, finds that the I-net is not economically feasible in today's market and in the foreseeable future. o The Committee identifies three costs: 1) a fully-built 166- mile I-net at 3-to-4 million dollars; 2) a 41-mile mini I- net at $643,691; and 3) enhancement of the residential network for institutional uses by nonrevenue-generating public users at $35,321. o The company presently employs one full-time sales engineer, 80% time-dedicated, to market institutional uses to companies in the Southwest and Minneapolis franchise area. Oversight is provided by the local Vice President of Engineering. In addition, the company employs a business network manager at its U.S. corporate level to assist local efforts in the development of I-net business. RECOMMENDATIONS OF SWING In consideration of its findings and charge, SWING made the following recommendations to the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission: I-net Report September 16, 1988 Page 4 1) The requirement to build an I-net in the SW franchise area should be deferred for a minimum of five years or until such time as a sizable base of institutional users is identified and secured to finance the capital expense without cable subscriber subsidy. 2) Future study of the telecommunications market and economic feasibility of the I-net should be at the Commission's discretion. 3) An enhancement of the residential network should be implemented in a 50% cost-split with the participating school districts with a maximum cost contribution by the cable company up to $17,660.50. By the addition of equipment at Rogers' headend, the subscriber network's current capacity for video conferencing applications will double. With the addition of equipment, not only can two channels be transmitted per city, but once received at the headend, they can be discreetly routed to one or more cities. This doubles the capacity for the school's interactive classroom use. This recommendation permits each district to make an independent decision to participate if so desired. Any additional modulators, cameras, televisions or other equipment that may be needed in the schools should be purchased by the school districts. This offer is good until September 1, 1993. PRESENTATION TO SWSCC AND SWSCC'S RECOMMENDATIONS TO MEMBER CITIES SWING presented their report and recommendations to the SWSCC Operating Committee and Full Commission in the Fall of 1988. The Full Commission, at their meeting on September 7, 1988, accepted SWING's first two recommendations and decided to amend the third recommendation concerning funding due to the fact that all institutional users benefit from the enhancement made to the subscriber network. It is not only a benefit to school districts, but also to the individual cities, as the doubling of capacity will permit the cablecasting of two live programs simultaneously from an individual city which has become of concern to the Member Cities. The SWSCC's recommendations to the Member Cities are as follows: 1) The requirement to build an I-net in the SW franchise area should be deferred for a minimum of five years or until such time as a sizable base of institutional users is identified and secured to finance the capital expense without cable subscriber subsidy. �2� I-net Report September 16, 1988 Page 5 2) Future study of the telecommunications market and economic feasibility of the I-net should be at the Commission's discretion. 3) The SWSCC recommends that the enhancement of the residential network be implemented in a 50% cost share between the SWSCC and the cable company of the $35,321 amount. The Commission, by contributing $17,660.50, is making sure the enhancement is begun prior to transfer of the system and completed shortly thereafter as the ordering of equipment allows. In order to recoup some of the cost in the future from the school districts, requests for channel time on the government and public access channel will be negotiated at a cost to the school districts. The Commission recommends approval by Member Cities of its three recommendations, along with an authorization for the SWSCC to pay the $17,660.50 out of the relief settlement proceeds to be received from Rogers, contemplating future action by the city council on the settlement offer. If, for some reason, Member Cities do not approve the settlement offer of Rogers at an upcoming meeting, the enhancement will be paid in a proportionate amount out of city franchise fees. The SWSCC urges your acceptance of their recommendations, with the Commission's cash contribution to the project in order that the enhancement can proceed in a timely manner. Rogers Cablesystems has committed to completing the project as soon as all five Member Cities approve the Commission's recommendations. • SW2 9/16/88 22313 CITY OF E HENNEPIN COUP � w" RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Councr 2z ZZ�Z the following persons have agreed to < I)�c '`/�1I�_ appointed for the General Election to VY PRECINCT 1A KING OF GLOP 17850UucTc t Janet Dahlke 6961 Ticonde Loretta Ellison 16920 South Karen Hackman 18212 Valley Olive Larson 16700 Main 5. Carole Meidinger 15918 Cedar I Bernice Sandness 16700 Main Street, *410 934-8207 Anne Thomas 17440 Duck Lake Trail 934-9205 JoAnn Wronski ** 6630 Tartan Curve 934-4226 PRECINCT 18 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER 16700 Valley View Road 937-8727 Judy Baker ** 7113 Muirfield Lane 937-2153 , Dolores Brown 7260 Tartan Curve 934-0848 Laverne Hales 7946 Island Road 934-1746 Anne Hawkins 18099 South Shore Lane West 934-2253 Bill Jellison 9560 Highview Drive 934-0934 Dorothy Schwartz 15051 Scenic Heights Road 937-2289 Tommy Thomas 17440 Duck Lake Trail 934-9205 PRECINCT 2 EDEN PRAIRIE ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH 16591 Duck Lake Trail —— 934-2327 Roberta Bronson 6236 Eden Prairie Road 934-9070 Shirley Carlon 15606 North Lund Road 934-2966 Helen Haupt ** 15709 South Lund Road 934-9127 Allene Hookom 16741 Prairie Lane 934-2550 Delores Klein 15701 North Lund Road 934-9124 Kathleen Porta 15612 Sunset Circle 934-6634 Elaine Udstuen 12774 Gordon Drive 941-3654 PRECINCT 3 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CHURCH 17200 Valley View Road 937-9593 Tom Alberti 18241 Duck Lake Trail 934-5148 Fay Clark ** 7392 Ontario Boulevard 934-4460 Adeline Levin 6743 Hallmark Drive 937-1709 Lydia Martinson 8317 Red Rock Road 937-8787 Laurie Pennebaker 7284 Prairie View Drive 937-2623 Mary Upton 16163 Edenwood Drive 937-2938 Ethyl Wokasch 15129 Lesley Lane 937-8802 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-213 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that the following persons have agreed to serve as elections judges and are appointed for the General Election to be held on November 8, 1988. PRECINCT 1A KING OF GLORY LUTHERAN CHURCH 17850—puck Lake—Trail— 934-1708 Janet Dahlke 6961 Ticonderoga Trail 934-4464 Loretta Ellison 16920 South Shore Lane 934-3060 Karen Hackman 18212 Valley View Road 934-9027 Olive Larson 16700 Main Street, #506 934-3234 Carole Meidinger 15918 Cedar Ridge Road 937-2840 Bernice Sandness 16700 Main Street, #410 934-8207 Anne Thomas 17440 Duck Lake Trail 934-9205 JoAnn Wronski ** 6630 Tartan Curve 934-4226 PRECINCT 1B EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER 16700 Valley View Road 937-8727 Judy Baker ** 7113 Muirfield Lane 937-2153 . Dolores Brown 7260 Tartan Curve 934-0848 Laverne Hales 7946 Island Road 934-1746 Anne Hawkins 18099 South Shore Lane West 934-2253 Bill Jellison 9560 Highview Drive 934-0934 Dorothy Schwartz 15051 Scenic Heights Road 937-2289 Tommy Thomas 17440 Duck Lake Trail 934-9205 PRECINCT 2 EDEN PRAIRIE ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH 16591 Duck Lake Trail —— 934-2327 Roberta Bronson 6236 Eden Prairie Road 934-9070 Shirley Carlon 15606 North Lund Road 934-2966 Helen Haupt ** 15709 South Lund Road 934-9127 Allene Hookom 16741 Prairie Lane 934-2550 Delores Klein 15701 North Lund Road 934-9124 Kathleen Porta 15612 Sunset Circle 934-6634 Elaine Udstuen 12774 Gordon Drive 941-3654 PRECINCT 3 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CHURCH 17200 Valley View Road 937-9593 Tom Alberti 18241 Duck Lake Trail 934-5148 Fay Clark ** 7392 Ontario Boulevard 934-4460 Adeline Levin 6743 Hallmark Drive 937-1709 Lydia Martinson 8317 Red Rock Road 937-8787 Laurie Pennebaker 7284 Prairie View Drive 937-2623 Mary Upton 16163 Edenwood Drive 937-2938 Ethyl Wokasch 15129 Lesley Lane 937-8802 PRECINCT 4 ST. ANDREW LUTHERAN CHURCH T4TOO Valley View Road 937-2776 Priscilla Bailey 6950 Mariann Drive 937-8885 Cheryl Bridge 7272 Gerard Drive 941-8104 Gertrude Dahlberg 6319 St. John's Drive 937-1299 Elaine Jacques 9021 Riley Lake Road 934-0944 Lyle Johnston 8621 Basswood Road, 018 944-930B Jean Lee 13231 Kerry Lane 937-1097 Ruth Mital ** 12762 Gordon Drive 944-3481 Alice Schultz 6325 St. John's Drive 937-8171 PRECINCT 5A IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH 16515 Luther Way 937-8123 Lois Campbell 635 Prairie Center Dr., 0229 941-2750 Leota Hales 7946 Island Road 934-1746 Joyce Myhre ** 15011 Summerhill Drive 937-2815 Caroline Nelson 16300 Hilltop Road 937-8941 Laurina Reiff 7024 Baker Road 937-8820 Elizabeth Watson 8047 Curtis Lane 934-5707 PRECINCT 58 IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH 16515 Luther Way 937-8123 Becky Heald 7631 Ontario Boulevard 937-5457 Katharine Hendrickson 635 Prairie Center Dr., 0218 944-5281 Shirley Jellison ** 9560 Highview Drive 934-0934 Alfred Nelson 16300 Hilltop Road 937-8941 Merrill Watson 8047 Curtis Lane 934-5707 PRECINCT 6 EDEN PRAIRIE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 150b0Scenic Heights Road 937-8781 Connie Blad 17345 Pioneer Trail 937-2841 Virginia Gartner ** 15701 Cedar Ridge Road 937-1595 Jinny Gibson 15737 North Cedar Ridge Road 937-1374 June Hanson 15711 Summit Drive 937-8278 Bernice Holasek 10020 Dell Road 934-1185 Judy Miller 7835 Eden Court 937-8653 Kay Nicholson 16201 Hilltop Road 937-1928 Marie Wittenberg 9880 Crestwood Terrace 934-0961 PRECINCT 7A NEW TESTAMENT CHURCH 12901 Roberts rl5rive 941-7290 Rita Anderson 14312 Fairway Drive 937-8196 Adeline Bramwell ** 14329 Fairway Drive 937-8987 Louise Doughty 13200 Roberts Drive 934-3858 Pauline Johnston 8621 Basswood Road 018 944-9308 Les LaBore 14366 Fairway Drive 937-2462 Ruth Olson 9051 East Staring Lane 937-1767 al PRECINCT 7B SOUTH SUBURBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY VO-TECH 9200 Flying Cloud Drive 944-9993 Lynn Bramwell 14328 Fairway Drive 937-8987 James Brown 11551 Riverview Road 941-1290 Juliet Gleason 8633 Darnel Road 944-6154 David Knaak 7935 South Bay Curve 934-0324 Viola McLain 14224 Chestnut Drive 937-1798 Jim Rannow ** 16316 Lincoln Lane 937-8237 Frances Schaitberger 9869 Crestwood Terrace 934-0987 Melody Villars 7616 Carnelian Lane 934-0448 PRECINCT 8 EDEN PRAIRIE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 11609 Leona Road 941-2521 Mary Boll 8705 Westwind Circle 941-6306 Maureen Miller 11555 Carriage Court 941-8072 Marion Nesbitt 8701 Black Maple Drive 941-2387 Cheryl Petersen 6429 City West Parkway, #4213 941-9504 Carol Sheridan 8908 Neill Lake Road 944-6643 Carol Smith 11013 Anderson Lakes Pkwy, #110 941-9007 Walter Thompson 11325 Westwind Drive, #F 941-1288 Barb Vanderploeg ** 8735 Leeward Circle 941-5363 PRECINCT 9A PAX CHRISTI CATHOLIC CHURCH T2TMO Pioneer rai 941-3150 Leone Barta 10065 Pioneer Trail 944-1551 Bernadine Beauvais 10285 Amsden Way 941-8152 Billie Brown 10320 Balsam Lane 829-5599 Dorothy Caba 10121 Laurel Drive 941-6994 Barbara Cail ** 9205 Talus Circle 941-5140 Ann Cheatham 9236 Amsden Way 941-8592 Len Helfand 15476 Village Woods Drive 934-6704 Nancy Little 9450 Aspen Circle 944-2437 PRECINCT 9B PAX CHRISTI CATHOLIC CHURCH T2TMO PioneerTrail 941-3150 Jeanne Brandt ** 12300 Riverview Road 941-3316 Tim Gordon 10272 Arrowwood Drive 941-8067 Cheryl Hansen 9445 Aspen Circle 941-8690 Carol Hegge 10015 Pioneer Trail 941-2707 Bonnie Helfand 15476 Village Woods Drive 934-6704 Isabell Iverson 12135 Oxbow Drive 941-7465 Betty Schaitberger 12880 Pioneer Trail 941-1451 Vong Suvannarad 9595 Yorkshire Lane 941-1389 ** Indicates Head Judge ALTERNATE ELECTION JUDGES Renee Garpestad 18783 Chennault Way 937-0961 Linda Leathers 18895 Deerfield Trail 934-0142 Phil Olson 18543 Harrogate Drive 934-5353 Betty Schroedermeier 7130 Green Ridge Drive 934-3381 William Schwartz 15051 Scenic Heights Road 937-2289 ABSENTEE PROCESSING CENTER City Hall 7600 Executive Drive 937-2262 Kent Barker 15801 Cedar Ridge Road 937-1454 Perry Anderson 9505 Highview Drive 934-0938 A CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-231 RECORDING CONFORMANCE WITH DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR CABRIOLE CENTER (aka BACHMAN/ANDERSON DEVELOPMENT) WHEREAS, on June 7, 197B, James E. Sutherlin (Owner) and City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation, entered into a certain Developer's Agreement (Agreement) pertaining to that certain property referred to as CABRIOLE Bachman/Anderson Development) legally described in Exhibit A, attachedhereto;Yand,a EAS, to the developmenthof e Other CABRIOLE pCENTER;lied tandcertain provisions of said Agreement as WHEREAS, the City Staff has reviewed the Owner's compliance with said Agreement as to said CABRIOLE CENTER and has so advised this Council; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Eden Prairie City Council that as to CABRIOLE CENTER, the City finds the property in compliance, except for the following: "5. That the impact of the second phase of the building upon the Bloomington residents shall be mitigated using the following measures: "a. building should be designed to terrace from the west to the east to decrease the massing. "b. buffering and vegetation shall be introduced along the southerly and easterly ends of the second phase building and easterly edge of the parking ramp area. "12. Owner shall work with City Staff and affected Bloomington residents for review of drainage and landscaping plans to buffer the office use from the single family." BE IT FURTHER RESDLVED that the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as to all items mentioned herein. ADOPTED by the City Council on October 4, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ( John D. Frane, Clerk • SEAL 22ya 4 EXHIBIT A Legal Description I. Cabriole Center (aka Bachman Anderson) • The East 615 feet of that part of Government Lot 7 lying South of State Highway #5 in Section 13, Township 116, Range 22, and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Being registered land as is evidenced by the Certificate of Title No. 546158. OLD STATE HWY NO. 5 e WEST 78"'ST 5C 5 G^b"le 37'W 50 - -:-15.3Z-- ,,) - ' l'-.-----------;__-.----- / --� ev \ N r _1�- \ ,1 y , \ NN I , , �_ L� ud NI 1 /' 1 i °n L7 '' / A • ° `�. S. ,S,' / �' f ar e9, , / w 31 al Area ,, ti I Tot' ,,. is Sur. ey ° ., I o G© © y o N OV 71, \ j. ':'', / , 1 ..), ° CI j,/ / - / '''° \.. _ 7„//:, - , .o 0.0:„.......-- ‘I • iL''"--------- // ioi>7//: { °P J QS G n . 3 1"?DL7 e � NW • •mr •oenote Iron Menurnent<t9- „ / fre N0 � 1bobo / ��'Net' 1 I 1 K 10 II IF Jy, 5B4' 0'W. 04.4I._ -_ / / "Z,/= ,-- t,az'`7L 78 . -- Al JL -- - _v. .� „ '_,..e a -' - Nenn Co Monument @ M.C. \\\ AAIDER50N LAKE 45 [OccATEO /N APPL,/973 aa1 L ..` CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-232 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR FAIRFIELD ADDITION WHEREAS, the proposed sanitary sewer to be constructed in FAIRFIELD ADDITION requires a connection to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commisssion (MWCC) interceptor system; and WHEREAS, the proposed connection conforms to the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Sewer Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to submit an application for "Permit for Connection to or Use of Commission Facilities" to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on OCTOBER 4, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk 3 Ir CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-233 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO APPLY FOR AND EXECUTE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LICENSE TO CROSS PUBLIC WATERS WITH A SANITARY SEWER IN APLINE ESIAILS ACRES 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, the proposed sanitary sewer to be constructed in ALPINE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION requires crossing of an area designated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as protected wetlands; and WHEREAS, a license from the Department of Natural Resources is necessary to authorize this crossing. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: A. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to submit an application for license to cross public waters and execute said license when processed. ADDPTED by the City Council on October 4, 1988. • Gary D. Peterson, Mayor • ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • 2 2 LIB Pannekoeken Huis on Lake Idlewild CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. 88-229 A RESOLUTION DENYING SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE #33-88 FOR THE PROPOSED PANNEKOEKEN HUIS DEVELOPMENT ON LAKE IDLEWILD WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 33-88, authorizing first reading of a rezoning of property for the proposed Pannekoeken Huis on Lake Idlewild development by Marco Construction did receive first reading by the City Council at a regular meeting on August 9, 1988; and; WHEREAS, Marco Construction, proponents for the development of Pannekoeken Huis on Lake Idlewild, have submitted to the City, in writing, notification that they will not be proceeding with development of the property as was reviewed by the City at the time of said first reading; NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED 8Y THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that second reading of Ordinance #33-88 is hereby denied and that the attendant request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office to Regional Commercial on 1.24 acres for the Pannekoeken Huis on Lake Idlewild by Marco Construction, is also hereby denied. ADOPTED by the City Council on October 4, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • 22yt7 { CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-218 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 20th day of September, 1988, fixed the 4th day of October, 1988 as the date for a public hearing on the following proposed improvements: I.C. 52-147 - Watermain extension on Eden Prairie Road (CSAH 4) and Pioneer Trail (CSAH 1). WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the Council hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held on the 4th day of October, 1988 at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 2. The City Engineer is hereby designed as the Engineer for this project with the assistance of H.T.P.O., consulting engineers. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on October 4, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk �d: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-223 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and, WHEREAS, the proposal of Bud Redburn Insurance Agency, Inc., for development of the Redburn Building for Neighborhood Commercial and Office use requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows; located east of County Road 04, south of Highway #5, be modified on 1.5 acres from Industrial to Neighborhood Commercial and on 0.58 acres from Industrial to Office. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 4th day of October, 1988.. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • .22(19 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ( RESOLUTION #88-224 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE REDBURN BUILDING FOR BUD REDBURN INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of the Redburn Building for Bud Redburn Insurance Agency, Inc.; dated September aft, 1988,. consisting of 2.33 acres into 2 lots and road right- of-way, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 4th day of October, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • Faso STAFF REPORT 1 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: September 9, 1988 PROJECT: Redburn Office Building LOCATION: Southeast quadrant of the intersection of Highway County Road 44, east of Burger King Restaurant APPLICANT: Bud Redburn FEE OWNER: Burger King Corporation REQUEST: 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Industrial to Neighborhood Commercial on 1.5 acres and from Industrial to Office on 0.58 acres. 2. Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 0.58 acres. 3. Preliminary Plat of 2.08 acres into 2 lots. Background ,,,�` :/ N-COM [ . P'- R1-'I,y3_5- 384.. .-(PUB 4 This site is currently designated as ...i,—{+?,:i ,, , iyi I i Industrial on the Comprehensive C_COM _tr < Guide Plan. Surrounding land uses f—i-1 are guided Community Commercial to - - Ri-2,r the north across Highway 45; —" L Industrial to the east and south; R1-22. I' ' 5 and, Commercial and Office to the - _..: 1 a' west across County Road 44. RM-2.5 PUB N-CO / /�l/o. Guide Plan Change C COM ,ZS, , , PUB OFC .. O �., 4A There are two Guide Plan >441 requested. The first Guide Plan RM-2.5 I _'.- co-WV. ..� Change is a City-initiated request pF OFC' ;•;;r. PROPOSED to provide the appropriate land use eillkil- '''�. designation for the Burger King RM=6.5 `'' SITE /' ' -{ site. The Staff is recommending a -- C HWY : _ -I Neighborhood Commercial designation I_2 I-GEN for this site because of its size • 1 and to limit possibilities for �R113.5 RM 2.5 T � ,'f expansion of future Commercial areas on undeveloped property to the ' R1-22 r , Pll AREA LOCATION MAP --- 2.zS I Redburn Office Building 2 September 9, 1988 south. The second Guide Plan Change request is for the 1-acre piece of property to be split off from the Burger King site which would be designated Office. Reasons for considering a change in the Guide Plan from Industrial to Office for this 1-acre piece would be lower traffic generation than if the site was developed as Commercial, the multi-level building utilizes the topography better than a 1-story industrial or commercial building, and the low site FAR. Site Plan The site plan depicts the construction of a 11/2-story, 3,000 square foot office building at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.12. For Office zoning, the Code would allow up to a 0.3 FAR. The building and parking areas meet the minimum setback requirements in the Office zoning district. A total of 15 parking spaces are required; 18 parking spaces are provided on-site. Access to this site will be by private driveway with a shared access and maintenance agreement with the Burger King property. The driveway would connect to Terrey Pine Drive. No direct access will be permitted to Highway #5. Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat depicts the subdivision of 2.8 acres into 2 lots. Proposed Lot 1 is the existing Burger King site and the lot size meets the minimum requirements for the C-Highway zoning district. Proposed Lot 2 meets the minimum lot size and square footage requirement for the Office zoning district. The preliminary plat should depict the additional right-of-way necessary for the construction of Highway #5. The proponent should contact the State Highway Department for additional right- of-way needs. Grading Proposed grading for this site is minimal to provide a pad area for a parking lot. Some grading will be necessary to accommodate the proposed office; however, the use of the multi-level building makes sense on a sloping piece of property. Architecture The Code requires that buildings in the Office zoning district be at least 75% facebrick and glass. The exterior materials calculations indicate 65% facebrick and glass. The plans should be revised to meet Code. Since these two buildings are located in close proximity on a small parcel, there should be architectural continuity between the buildings. The Staff would suggest that the colors for the office building be consistent with the colors used on the Burger King building. Landscaping The project, as proposed, meets the minimum caliper inch requirement per City Code. Additional plantings should be installed along the south and west property lines to provide for better screening of the parking areas from the Terrey Pine Drive. 2"(„). Redburn Office Building 3 September 9, 1988 4 Utilities Utilities are available for sewer and water in Terrey Pine Drive. Storm water run- off is proposed to drain through a serier of catch basins into the drainage ditch in the Highway #5 right-of-way. Signage The proposed monument signs are in compliance with City Code. Lighting_ One lighting standard is proposed. The lighting standard should be the same as those utilized in the Burger King parking lot. This would be a 30-foot high downcast cut-off luminar. Traffic The intersection at Highway #5 and County Road #4 is at capacity. This intersection will be upgraded and substantially complete in 1990. When the intersection is complete, the level of service will be between B and C. The design standard for intersection level of service is level of service D. The amount of traffic generated by the proposed office building in the p.m. peak hour would be five trips. This is low when compared to an office building at a 0.3 FAR generating 13 trips or a commercial building developed at a 0.2 FAR generating 25 trips in the peak hour period. If developed for industrial at a 0.3 FAR, the p.m. peak hour would be 2 trips. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Staff would recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Industrial to Neighborhood Commercial on 1.5 acres and from Industrial to Office on 0.58 acres, a rezoning from Rural to Office on 0.58 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 2.08 acres into two lots, based on plans dated August 12, 1988, subject to the recommendations in the Staff Report, dated September 9, 1988, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council review, proponent shall: A. Revise exterior building elevations to meet the exterior material requirements per City Code. B. Modify the landscape plan to provide for better screening of parking areas from Terrey Pine Drive. 2. Prior to Final Plat approval, the proponent shall: A. Provide detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Provide detailed storm water run-off, utility, and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. Redburn Office Building 4 September 9, 1988 C. Dedicate the additional right-of-way as needed by the State Highway Department for Highway 05. D. Provide cross-access and maintenance agreement for the shared driveway between the Burger King site and the Redburn Office Building. 3. Prior to the Building permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. B. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee. C. Provide examples of proposed exterior building materials and color samples for review. D. Provide the overall lighting plan with details for review. E. Provide an overall signage plan with details for review. • • aasu D. REDBURN BUILDING,by Bud Redburn Insurance Agency,Inc. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Industrial to neighborhood Commercial on 1.5 acres and from Industrial to Office on 0.58 acres,Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 9.58 acres,and Preliminary Plat of 2.33 acres into 1 lots and road right-of-way for construction of a 2,000 square foot office building. Location: East of Terrey Pine Drive,south of Highway#5,east of Burger King. A public hearing. Proponent gave a brief history of the parcel of land,and described the construction of the 1-1/2 story,3,000 square foot office building. Proponent stated that the building elevations would be revised to meet code at 75%brick and glass. The plan presented was 65%brick and glass. Franzen reported that the project involved two Guide Plan changes. The first was a City initiated request that provided the appropriate land use designation for the Burger King site. The Staff was recommending a Neighborhood Commercial designation for the site because of the size to limit possibilities for expansion of future Commercial on the undeveloped property to the south. The second Guide Plan change was for the 1/2 acre piece of property to be split off from the Burger King site to be designated Office. The reason for considering a change in the Guide Plan from Industrial to Office for the 1/2 acre piece was due to lower traffic generation than if the site was developed as Commercial,and the multi-level building utilized the topography to its advantage. Hallett asked if the access to Hwy.5 from Burger King was closed. Franzen said when Hwy.5 was upgraded it would be closed. He added that to turn and go south out of Burger King was just about impossible,but the improvements,when completed on County Road 4,would help the situation.The improvements planned are expanded lanes with double left turn lanes. Franzen concluded that this was not a perfect solution but it would be better than it was now. Hallett inquired if there was adequate parking. Franzen replied that they were in excess of requirement. Ruebling asked were the signage would be placed. Proponent replied on the northwest property corner and on the southeast property corner. Proponent concluded that Staff Recommendations did not pose a problem. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to close the public hearing on the request of Bud Redburn • Insurance Agency. Motion carried 7-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Bud Redburn Insurance Agency,Inc.,for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Industrial to neighborhood Commercial on 1.5 acres and from Industrial to office on 0.58 acre for the Redbum Building,based on plans dated August 20,and September 9,1988,subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 9,1988. Motion carried 7-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Bud Redburn Insurance Agency,Inc.,for Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 0.58 acre for the Redburn Building.based on plans dated August 20 and September 9,1988,subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 9,1988. Motion carried 7-0-0 MOTION 4; • Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Bud Redburn Insurance Agency,Inc.,for Preliminary Plat of 2.33 acres into two lots and road right-of-way for construction of a 3,000 sq.ft.office building to be known as the Redburn Building,based on plans dated August 20, and September 9,1988,subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 9,1988. rn r Motion carried 7-0-0 ac( STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: September 9, 1988 PROJECT: Prairieview It Commercial Office Building LOCATION: North of Plaza Drive, cast of Prairie View Shopping Center APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Mark Rooney, Curt Johnson Properties, Inc. REQUEST: Zoning District Amendment within the C-Regional Service Zoning District on 2.17 acres for construction of a 12,658 square foot retail office building. I _ Background - PUB -t r` —r1 � This site is currently guided � Regional Commercial. The site is also currently zoned C-Regional �,;,< C-REG-SER •aN �� Service according to a specific site \ I plan for a 7,500 square foot ____ restaurant (see Attachment A). I ; !.. ,".-. r C REG-SER Site Plan U The site plan depicts the con- CREG '-''` struction of a 12,658 square foot 01 (�:� PROPOSED SITE retail office building on 2.17 acres :.. at a 0.13 FAR. For the C-Regional G:SER' Service zoning district the Code ' !%! - would allow up to a D.2 Floor Area • ' '_ tom► Ratio (FAR). Total parking required ] .-._ -�. ‘ c.,.....---"z- is 89 parking spaces. A total of . 117 are provided on-site. The • building and parking areas meet the i 1 _eJ C minimum setback requirements for the I • C-Regional Service Zoning District. To help internal circulation, a turn-around is needed on the north -'- side of the building because the CREGSER= parking lot dead-ends at the east property line. C-REG- I - C REG-SER • CIF( AREA LOCATION MAP Prairie View II 2 September 9, 1988 Traffic The amuunt of traffic allocated to this site is 43 p.m. peak hour trips. This is based upon the trip generation rate of the approved 7,500 square foot restaurant. The amount of traffic that would be generated from the retail office building would be 43 trips. Access The overall circulation plan fur Prairie View Center included a common driveway to serve as a service entrance to Prairie View Center and as site access to the freestanding sites to the east. The common driveway would eliminate additional curb cuts on Plaza Drive which makes sense because of the traffic volumes. Cross-access to Prairie View was also contemplated in the original plan and therefore the driveways align directly opposite. This cross-access is somewhat complicated by the proximity of the TCBY drive-through. The problem with TCBY is poor site vision to the north and a circulation problem. If the Commission concurs that this is a problem, Attachment B shows a way to improve circulation and site vision distance. Grading_ The site has been previously graded with the Prairie View Shopping Center. Minor grading will be necessary to provide a level pad area for the building and parking. There are no significant trees on-site. Architecture The building is proposed to be constructed out of facebrick and glass. The building will be one-story in height for the retail portion facing Plaza Drive. The office portion located behind the retail area will be two stories in height. The maximum building height will be 30 feet. The Code would allow up to a 40-fcot building height. The building will utilize the same brick as the Prairie View Shopping Center. The project would benefit from an additional visual tie between the retail portions of the proposed building and the existing retail buildings. We have suggested to the proponents that a canopy of a similar color to the metal canopy on the Prairie View Center could be located across the front portion of the building. The rooftop mechanical equipment will be screened by 3-foot high parapet walls for the retail portion of the building. There will be a mechanical equipment room for the office building. Landscaping The proposed landscape plan meets the minimum requirements of the City's landscape ordinance. Because of the 5D-foot utility easement across the front yard setback, berming cannot be constructed to screen the parking areas, and therefore the landscape plan will rely solely on the use of plant materials for screening. Screening proposed would be consistent with the existing screening in front of the Prairieview Shopping Center. :,1p1 J Prairie View II 3 September 9, 1988 Lighting Lighting standards proposed will be 30-foot high downcast cut-off luminars. The lighting details should be the same as the Prairieview Shopping Center. Signage Signage proposed for the retail portion of the building will be consistent with the Prairieview retail signage. All letters will be individual, internally lit, with a uniform color, and a maximum height of 24 inches, and a maximum length of 15 feet. The office sign will be individually lit letters of uniform color to match the retail signs. A free-standing pylon sign is proposed within the setback area along Plaza Drive. The sign is in compliance with City Code requirements. Materials and colors on the proposed pylon sign should be consistent with materials on the retail and office building. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the Zoning District Amendment in the existing C-Regional Service Zoning District, based on plans dated August 31, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report, dated September 9, 1988, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council review, proponent shall: A. Modify the architectural building elevations to provide for a canopy of consistent color to match the Prairie View Shopping Center canopy. B. Modify the site plan according to Attachment B to improve access and circulation. 2. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Notify the Watershed District and City at least 48 hours in advance of grading. B. Provide samples of the proposed exterior materials for review. C. Provide the overall signage plan for review. D. Provide the lighting details for review. E. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee. 4 r . 1 3 I .40,,.„1:-,,z4;.......-. .....-,. . .-N .. , L.i) . i- e ., 7'.'4_::Y 0, ...•:1",.•.• ''''—• ...--.D. Aipty t ti x • it -,:.=,0 (0 , ' \ t e�` r .i !.......--. ......,.....,.,1 I, .,,.....„.„,,,„,.,,...,,,:,iE..,..„,... . . . , IT ' �� � . . . V ``.:�, • 14�v .. . ..19.0. ill � i::;$ • �, , — a ! .: 14 of t .1 K .4: tO-0 t t1 .t G ) ' ' . ' 1 sr. . i. itii4 - BONANZA'. • BUfLDINO•El !,' I 0 4 i :a. ,:samuminem:'. 141 01 :-.1____2--'4, ip � ___�- ................_______:_i... I ...............:—. _ - --........- ....'"'"; — :77 1 — r+r► . ("--) . I� /1 • \ JI tACATE RIGHT OF WAY 1 �\ FOR BERM ANO LANOSCAF li :--- / Attachment A "1 , ,�� 'MAY 02 198E :.%a'tJ 'CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE .... .... C._ ill I ! • .. I 0 --i 0 M • 14111. ' 1) 111 —L "TIM imk -11-1 NI .. Z , 1 i:. 0103 , , ......... , . .......,00 E ,I 00 I, I. • . ..-, . ._ .. • - \ 0 0 1 1 1 • l• i :, ' I lir , 1 ‘• • p• 1 • , ,. •, CO 4______,• 1 , 1 •L,) NI co • , ,/. \•, \ L. .\ ,.,‘"•----' -ii • -1- --- \ 1 ...- , , 9.‘• '\ , /------'--- ( C.i:i 0 L-1.1 .I. .g.. 1 _,1 • __ ,.__. ...__ I Li • I '! 1 1 A i . I / , --I I ' ( -- - --- 0 1 ' 0 1 i E II 1; > I I ! , 1 '• 1 1 3, P Ally Z rl A-1-rAikrl,r I.. .-,i,;•, I ......" •"?.'. " i 1.. 'f',2• 610 7:i C. PRAIRIEVIEW II,by Curt Johnson Properties,Inc. Request for Zoning District Amendment within the C-Regional Service Zoning District on 2.17 acres for construction of a 12,658 square foot retaiVoffice use, Location: North of Plaza Drive, east of the Prairie View Shopping Center. A public meeting. Mike Wilkus,proponent,described the project as a 12,658 square foot retail office building on 2.17 acres. The building proposed would be constructed of facebrick and glass,and would be one-story in height for the retail area and two stories in height for office space. He continued that the brick used would be the same as Prairie View Shopping Center in order to be visually tied together. The Staff suggested that a canopy of a similar color to the ones on the Prairie View Center be installed on the front portion of the building. Proponent stated that the recommendation for such canopy has them torn,due to the tenants that have a more professional standing. They did not want to match the character cf the true retail skorc. He added that if the Commission felt that the building should be tied together cioser with the area,they would comply. The second issue was the TCBY Yogurt drive-thru,and proponent did not feel they had any control over that. Franzen reported that the architectural colors and materials were similar to the retail center. The recommendation of the canopy was subjective. Regarding the access,Franzen stated that the original plan depicted cross-access to Prairie View which was why the driveways align directly opposite. This has become complicated with the TCBY drive-through,which has a poor site vision to the north and a circulation problem. He pointed out that an attached alternative to traffic flow would limit the access to a right turn from TCBY. Fell inquired about the rooftop equipment screening. Proponent replied that the major portion of the mechanical equipment would be housed in the lower level. The rooftop units would be screened with 3'parapet walls. Ruebling clarified that the recommendation would be one-way traffic to Edina Sales&Leasing and then traffic would continue on through the Prairie View Center II as two way traffic. Ruebling stated that in reference to the architecture for consistency of Prairie View Shopping Center,the amount of glass would create a large amount of difference. If the proponent was to add the canopy,where would they be placed,and would a covered canopy along the walkway be required. Franzen replied that a continuous canopy was typically recommended for larger centers where there would be a greater amount of pedestrian traffic. In this case since the retail is only 5,000 square feet,the canopy is more architectural than functional. Franzen stated that perhaps the color of brick was a sufficient tie with the difference in providing a variety of architecture. Commission consensus r:as that a canopy was not required. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to close the public hearing. Motion carried 7-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Curt Johnson Properties,Inc.,for Zoning District Amendment within the Commercial-Regional-Service District on 2.17 acres for construction of a 12,658 sq.ft.retail/office use,for Prairieview II,based on plans dated September 2,1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 9,1988,with the deletion of recommendation 1.A. requiring a canopy. Motion carried 7-0-0 " (ol • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE p HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA L RESOLUTION #88-225 • RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WYNDHAM NOB 2N0 ADDITION FOR BURL CORPORATION BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Wyndham Nob 2nd Addition for Burl Corporation, dated September 30, 198B, consisting of 27.2 acres into 41 single family lots, 3 outlots, and road right-of-way, a copy of which is on file at the City Hail, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 4th day of October, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • • • • STAFF REPORT i TO: Planning Commission FROM: Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: September 9, 1988 PROJECT: Wyndham Nob 11 LOCATION: South of Townline Road, east of Chennault Way within Hidden Glen 3rd Addition APPLICANT: Burl Corporation FEE OWNERS: Derrick, Schroeder, Jacques, Trelstad, Ess, Hickman, and the Estate of Elizabeth R. Pauly REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 18.9 acres and from Rural to R1-9.5 on 7.2 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals. 2. Preliminary Plat of 27.2 acres into 41 single family lots, 3 outlots, and road right-of-way. Background IrititT403) 1;V1 1�11�� ''\ t"T r.�-g� This site is currently guided for �`""'"" ►�1�h�j� PROPOSED` Low Density Residential land uses as C.6�l:IIG' ►'"4;44q SITES':"':= 's:^� are the adjacent properties. init ►��j��1 .� -h Specific land uses in this area ' ' �� ' ,.., ���� ` '16:s:<' .; . include CSAH 1162 and the City of ` :•'� 4 �* a Minnetonka to the north; Wyndham Nob — � 1 � t�%�� • �'`.t 1st Addition, zoned R1-13.5 to the �' ' L •`-✓ R1 13• ` • •east; the Wyndham Knoll Addition, R `vI �'• 1 .• zoned RI-13.5 to the south; and the } 'd �� `.•far Hidden Glen 3rd Addition, zoned R1- ` w +.�"� 7 9.5 and R1-13.5 to the west. A Tom Thumb convenience store and the -v,:I : RM'6.Especially for Children daycare m. � I. facility, zoned N-Commercial, is -located to the northwest of the 4 ,� �• project. The 9f ,!, proponent is requesting the 4,`. : R .e' , I ?,'' l'�, • preliminary platting of �v j _ /!„ti','r approximately 27.2 acres ' to 41 •1 + R1�7 ;'- single family lots, 3 outlots, and us �' • 40{ road right-of-way. t if`Ore �_ . •',• -. F: . ra AREA LOCATION MAP.. Wyndham Nob II 2 September 9, 1988 Site Plan/Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat depicts the subdivision of 27.2 acres into 41 single family lots at a density of 1.5 units/acre. Outlot A, containing 8.87 acres, is proposed to be dedicated to the City while Outlots B and C, containing 0.69 acres, are proposed to be combined with Lots 32 and 33, Block 1, Wyndham Knoll Addition. The proponent shall agree to replat these lots when the combination occurs. A total of 17.64 acres will be developed as part of this project. Because two zoning districts are requested, each request will be addressed in separate sections. R1-9.5 Zoning District A total of 16 lots are being subdivided from the 7.2 acres within the R1-9.5 zoning district at a density of 2.22 units/acre. Typically, the R1-9.5 zoning district is located within the Medium Denisty Residential Guide Plan designation; however, because the density is less than 2.5 units/acre, no Guide Plan Change is necessary. Lot sizes range from a minimum of 10,700 square feet to a maximum of 23,000 square feet. Average lot size is 14,463 square feet. All lots meet the minimum requirements of the zoning district with the exception of Lots 5, 6, 7, and 19, where variances are being requested for lot frontage due to the location on a curve. The minimum lot frontage in the R1-9.5 zoning district is 70 feet. Lots 5 and 6 measure 55 feet, while Lot 7 measures 60 feet. The lots meet the minimum width at the building setback. Lot 19, located at the intersection of Schroeder Place and Chennault Way, measures 84 feet on Schroeder Place. The minimum width for a corner lot in the R1-9.5 zoning district is 95 feet. Due to the location of the lots on curves and since they meet all other minimum requirements, Staff would recommend favorably for the requested variances. Finally, because of the R1-9.5 zoning district, this portion of the project is subject to architectural control. This would mean that no units within two units on either side, across, or diagonally across, shall be the same unit type. The proponent has submitted a package of 10 unit types to he built within this area. R1-13.5 Zoning District In the R1-13.5 zoning district, a total of 22 new lots and Lots 1-3, Block 1, Wyndham Nob 1st Addition, are being platted. The purpose of the re-platting is to include a strip of land measuring 30 by 338 feet along the rear of the lots to increase their depths adjacent the R1-9.5 zoning district. Lots 10 and 31 will be combined with Outlot C and D, Block 5, from the Hidden Glen 3rd Addition to make developable parcels. Lot sizes within this area range from a minimum of 13,500 square feet to a maximum of 21,500 square feet. Average lot size is 17,827 square feet. All lots meet the minimum requirements of the R1-13.5 zoning district, with the exception of Lot 5, Block 2. Because of its location on a curve, the proponent is requesting a variance to reduce the frontage to 70 feet. On previous projects, 75 feet was the minimum lot frontage approved. if 75 feet is required, the proponent would either: 1) remove one lot from the south side of the street; 2) request additional variances for adjacent lots to allow for the additional 5 feet; or, 3) request additional developable land from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Access to this site will he provided by the extension of Chennault Way from its current terminous within the Hidden Glen 3rd Addition and from the Wyndham Nob 1st Addition. The project abuts CSAH #62 and would require the dedication of an additional 27 feet to make the right-of-way a minimum of 60 feet from the centerline of the -oad and a 200 by 7 foot triangle for trail purposes (see Attachment A). Wyndham Nob II 3 September 9, 1988 Floodplain/Conservancy Zone In this area, the floodplain elevation is located at the 870 contour elevation but does not extend into the site. This project has been reviewed by the Department of Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. According to the Purgatory Creek study, this entire parcel is located within the Purgatory Creek Conservancy Zone. Due to its location adjacent CSAH #62, the lack of any significant site features, the amount of preserved open space, and the fact that if the Purgatory Creek study was strictly adhered to, this property would be undevelopable. It is felt that the intent of Purgatory Creek Recreation Study is being met. Grading. Elevations on this site range from a high point at the 910 contour elevation located along the western property line to a low point at the 872 contour elevation adjacent the eastern property line and the 870 contour located within the northeast corner of the project. Maximum cut and fill on the site would range from approximately 10 feet of cut located within Lot 14 and a maximum fill amount of approximately 6 feet at various locations within the R1-9.5 district. Because fill is being proposed within the adjacent wetland area, a permit has been requested and received from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. Watershed District approval is also required. Due to the location of the property adjacent the proposed Crosstown freeway extension, a berm and landscape plantings should be proposed along the northern property line for noise mitigation purposes. The grading plan depicts the removal of approximately 582 caliper inches of significant trees on this site. Based upon the tree preservation policy, a total of 212 caliper inches would be required to be replaced. The tree replacement plan shall be submitted prior to Council review. Utilities Water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer service will be provided to this site by connections made to existing utilities within Chennault Way. Extensions to service this project include an 8-inch water and 8-inch sanitary sewer line. Storm water run-off is proposed to be collected within a catch basin system located within the street right-of-way and discharged into Outlot A. Pedestrian Systems No pedestrian system improvements have been identified with this project. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff would recommend approval of the Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 18.9 acres and from Rural to RI-9.5 on 7.2 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, and Preliminary Plat of 27.2 acres into 41 single family lots, 3 outlots, and road right-of-way, based upon plans dated August 22, 1988, subject to the Staff Report, dated September 9, 1988, and subject to the following conditions: Wyndham Nob II 4 September 9, 1988 1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: A. Submit a tree replacement plan depicting 212 caliper inches of plant material. B. Revise the plans to depict berming and landscaping adjacent CSAH #62. 2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit storm water run-off, utility, and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. C. Provide right-of-way for CSAH #62 as required by Hennepin County and the City of Eden Prairie. 3. Prior to Grading permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. Stake all grading limits with a snow fence. Any trees lost outside the grading limits shall be replaced on an area inch per area inch basis. B. Stake the construction limits with an erosion control fence. 4. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee. B. Submit building elevations for lots within the R1-9.5 zoning district as required for architectural control. 5. Apply for, and receive, variances for lot frontage from the Board of Appeals. 6. Concurrent with Final Plat, proponent has proposed to dedicate Outlot A to the City for conservation purposes. If the outlot is held privately, the proponent shall place the outlot in a drainage and utility easement and convey a scenic easement over the outlot to the City. In addition, a trail easement may be required depending upon the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission recommendations. 7. Agree to replat Lots 32 and 33, Block 1, Wyndham Knoll Addition when combined with Outlots B and C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av. South HENNEPIN Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 J 935-3381 August 22, 1988 Mr. Chris Enger Planning Director City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Enger: RE: Proposed Plat - Wyndham Nob 2nd Addition CSAH 62, South side, approximately 385 feet east of Dell Road Section 6, Township 116, Range 22 Hennepin County Plat No. 1663 Review and Recommendations Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 5D5.D3, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and make the following comments: - For future improvements to this segment of CSAH 62 the developer should dedicate the 27 feet of right of way plus the 200 x 7 foot triangle shown on Attachment 1 making the right of way a minimum of 60 feet from the center of CSAH 62. The additional right of way highlighted on Attachment 1 is required to construct a bikeway near the CSAH 62/TH ID! intersection. - All access to this plat from CSAH 62 must be via Chennault Way, previously approved as part of Wyndham Nob 1st Add., as shown. All lots abutting CSAH 62 and an internal street must take access via the internal street. No direct access from this plat to CSAH 62 will be permitted by Hennepin County. - All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. Contact our Maintenance Division for utility permit forms. - The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within County right of way. Please direct any response or questions to Les Weigelt. S'ncerely, ,s .je_L:efz David W. Schmidt, P.E. Transportation Planning DWS/LDW:lw HENNEPIN COUNTY an equol opportunity employer �'1 ATTACHMENT A 10 0 COUNTY RD 4 2 \r___ - o .' N \L N \' \ - I 1 . - No 5ca/e r .c) O \ i o S� 0 1 1 O Arr CHA N71 I \ 4. C \ 1 \ N 1 N N ,__ J L---- „. 73 7� . N N / \ � • s ..° / i sZ. ---- 0 1� (A O O 1 ,t 1�=i' � _ x o�,� �xs /�'11 Cn N :°L_ \ 0 0 - I - \ ` 4 z �� 1 ` N \ H o rn (P _ p I / 0 \ W ,. N `--Q�c ., --- — L_ i 5.. 0 — __Iir Isl dz- —!��/ B. WYNDHAM NOB 2ND ADDITION,by Burl Corporation. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1- 9.5 on 7.2 acres and from Rural to R1-13.5 on 18.9 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals,and Preliminary Plat of 27.2 acres into 41 single family lots,3 outlots,and road right-of-way. Location: South of Townline Road,as of Chennault Way within Hidden Glen 3rd Addition. A public hearing. Don Patton,proponent,presented the project and the request for the preliminary platting of 27.2 acres into 41 single family lots,3 outlots and road right-of-way. Outlot A,consisting of 8.87 acres, would be dedicated to the City. For the R1-9.5 zoning,proponent was requested 16 lots to be . subdivided with an average lot size of 14,463 square feet. For the R1-13.5 zoning,proponent was requesting 22 lots and Lots 1-3,Block 1,Wyndham Nob 1st Addition with an average lot size of 17,817 square feet. They had presented their grading plans to the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers and have received a permit. Staff requested that the adjacent property owners be included in the overall plat. The proponent preferred not to do that as it would require more signatures on the final plat but agreed to do whatever the City Engineer required. Proponent continued that Staff Report had been received Hennepin County requirements for right-of-way dedication for the proposed CSAH#62 extension. Access would be provided by an extension of Chennault Way from within Hidden Glen 3rd Addition and Wyndham Nob 1st Addition. Uram reported that Staff recommended approval of the project,but pointed out that due to the R1-9.5 zoning,that portion of the project would be subject to architectural control. Control being that no units within two units on either side,across,or diagonally across,shall be the same unit type. The proponent submitted a package of 10 types of units to be built within the area. Uram stated that all lots met the minimum requirements with the exception of Lot 5,Block 2. This lots location was on a curve,and the proponent was requesting a variance to reduce the frontage to 70 feet. Uram reminded the Commission that on previous projects,75 feet was the minimum lot frontage approved. He continued that if 75 feet was required,the proponent could either 1)remove one lot from the south side of the street,2)request additional variances for adjacent lots to allow for the additional 5 feet,or 3)request additional developable land from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers. Schuck asked if the variances would be granted if they added 5 feet. Uram replied that if the proponent received 5 feet from the Army Corps of Engineers,it would be consistent with past approvals. Llsa Marsh,18760 Chennault Way,asked how the project would connect with Chennault Way. She was concerned about the traffic it would create. Proponent responded that a Eden Prairie Planning Commission Meeting September 12.1988 Page 3 through street would be connected to Townline Road, Uram stated he had talked to several neighbors,and that additional information regarding Townline Road was available. The City of Minnetonka was considering the possibility of CSAH#62 being constructed with a median. Plans with a median have been endorsed by the City of Eden Prairie, Uram continued that at this time,it was not known if there would be a median cut at Chennault Way. The proponent felt that if the intersection at Dell Road and CSAH#62 was signalled,it would be questionable that Chennauft Way would become a short cut. Hallett asked if Commission should forward a recommendation regarding the median and signals. Uram replied that the Commission could make recommendations to the City Council on that matter. Hallett inquired if a bike way or walk way for pedestrians was in the plan. Franzen responded that he participated in a meeting regarding Townline Road, If the medium goes in or not, Minnetonka would install a trail on the north side and Eden Prairie was taking care of the south side. Hallett asked if there were any sidewalks in the area. Uram replied no,but if a sidewalk was requested,the nearest connection would be at Dell Road. Uram also stated that the Parks and Recreation plan was to have trail within outlot A at some point in the future. He continued that in discussion with Parks and Recreation,it was felt that an access to the outlot area along Chennault Way should have been provided. Regarding the 70' setback variance request on Lot 5,proponent stated that the Army Corp.of Engineers had placed the restrictions. Uram stated that the lot was 17,000 square feet,and felt their was ample enough room with required setbacks. • Ruebling inquired if construction traffic during the development of this project would be directed from Townline Road or Dell Road? He requested that as a matter of practice,a construction route should be developed instead of allowing the traffic to go through the surrounding residential area Uram replied that the Staff would discuss this with the City Engineer and request a construction route during the project and recommend it to the City Council. Dodge asked if 70'was a grantable variance. Uram replied that 84 feet was the minimum and 90'the maximum in accordance with code. Proponent had no comments on the variance. Uram requested that in reference to the 70' lot width,he would like to have something worked out with the Army Corps of Engineers for the additional 5 feet. Fell asked about the traffic noise. Uram stated a noise assessment was not conducted,however a berm and landscape plantings are proposed along the northern property line for noise mitigation purposes. Fell questioned the house plans with no back doors, Proponent replied that the buyer customizes the home and through city codes the doors would be there. The plans submitted was in order to meet the architectural code guidelines. Bye requested clarification on recommendation to Board of Appeals,and Ruebling requested that the motion include approval subject to recommendation by the Engineering Department for the construction of a traffic road. MOTION 1• Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to close the public hearing on the request of Wyndham Nob 2nd Addition. Motion carried 7-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Burl Corporation for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 on 7.2 acres and from Rural to R1-13.5 on 18.9 acres, with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals,for Wyndham Nob 2nd Addition,based on plans dated aa�c� Eden Prairie Planning Commission Meeting September 12.1988 Page 4 . August 22,1988,subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 9,1988,and subject to the • ( creation of a construction traffic route along Townline Road in accordance with the City Engineering Department. • N. Motion carried 7-0-0 • MOTION 3; Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Burl Corporation for Preliminary Plat of 27.2 acres into 41 single family lots,three outlots,and road right-of-way,for Wyndham Nob 2nd Addition,based on plans dated August 22,1988,subject to the recommendations of the Staff • Report dated September 9,1988,and subject to the creation of a construction traffic route along Townline Road in • accordance with the City Engineering Department. Motion carried 7-0-0 • MOTION 4: Motion was made by Fell and seconded by Dodge to recommend to the Board of Appeals that a review of the various options be considered and to be aware of the precedent setting of a 70'setback variance. The Commission further recommends that the Board find an alternative among the options presented. Motion carried 7-0-0 • MOTION 5; Motion was made by Ruebling and seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council a median be part of the Townline Road without a cut in the median at Chennault Way. Motion carried 7-0-0 • • • • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION #88-226 • RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CROSSTOWN PRAIRIE OFFICE WAREHOUSE FOR GARY A. HILDEN BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Crosstown Prairie Office Warehouse for Gary A. Hilden, dated September 30, 1988, consisting of 1.89 acres into one lot and road right-of- way, a copy of which is on tile at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 4th day of October, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk - STAFF REPORT i TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Assistant Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: September 9, 1988 PROJECT: Crosstown Prairie Office/Warehouse LOCATIOr': South of County Road #67, north and east of Nine Mile Creek APPL ICANT/ FEE OWNER: Gary A. Hilden REQUEST: 1. Site Plan Review on 1.89 acres within the I-2 Zoning District with variances, and Shoreland variances, to be reviewed by the 3oard of Appeals. 2. Preliminary Plat of 1.89 acres into one lot and road right- of-way. Background PROPOSED SITE"' �j / . The Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts `y'rE-\ an Industrial land use for this site `, . #4," ' S1-2i; I and surrounding sites. Nine Mile ,U6 ,y-;, , / ,.// � ,` l Creek and the Reuter dRDF Plant lie �.. � ram„ / ;;'� ; to the west and south, the Chicago, r ?• ` '`� 1 ; Milwaukee, St. Paul, and Pacific ` Railroad to the southwest, and the • l Jedlicki building to the east. The City of Minnetonka lies to the north of this site bounded by County Road 1 • ;/ti.�' `"' _��-6•.�.I #67. All properties in this area • ' are industrial land uses, zoned I-2 FP �imi ' . , in 1969 per Ordinance #135. This , . property is currently the home of A Ye- & H Welding, Inc., which has / + ' operated on the site since 1969. I— _ ! ' - _ The site contains three buildings, L �� r one of which is a metal pole barn. , . r" ,i�. P The portion of Nine Mile Creek, • / �% • which abuts this property, has been 4. / fir•����fs `4 a dry creekbed for many years. ii113���' v. PUB Dense vegetation exists along the - bank of this drainage way. I O �� •� .�,o is i HHi-. Ni AREA LOCATION MAP ,1%...,..Y• ,a v ...,0 I "•1 i 1 1 ..• t 1 1...4.y.i 1 a J Crosstown Prairie Office/Warehouse 2 September 9, 1988 ° Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat request is for 1.89 acres into 1 lot and road right-of-way. Drainage and utility easements have been provided around the site and along Nine Mile Creek, running along the proposed curb line to provide buffering from Nine Mile Creek. The portion of drainage and utility easement that abuts Nine Mile Creek will be placed into a perpetual easement in favor of the City for creek protection and maintenance purposes. City Code requires a minimum lot size of two acres for property within the I-2 Zoning District. Since this property was zoned I-2 prior to the property ever being platted, a variance will he necessary from the 2-acre minimum. Hennepin County is requesting 33 feet of right-of-way dedication for County Road #67. Site Plan The proposal is to construct a 19,216 square foot building on 1.78 net acres of land at a FAR of 24.7%, City Code would allow up to 30% in the I-2 zoning district. The proponent intends to occupy 9,200 square feet of the building and lease the remaining space for office/warehouse uses. Should the entire building become spec industrial space, the parking requirements for 1/3 office, 1/3 manufacturing, and 1/3 warehouse use, would be 54 spaces. The proponent has provided 50 spaces. Four additional spaces should be included as outlined in Attachment A to meet City Code. Because of the physical constraints of this property, a number of variances are being requested in order to develop the property. In addition to shoreland variances, which will be explained in the next section, the proponent is requesting the following variances: 1. Front yard setback to parking from 50 feet to 25 feet. 2. Side yard setback to parking from 10 feet to 0 feet. 3. Driveway isle entrance setback from 10 feet to 0 feet. 4. Lot size from a 2-acre minimum to 1.89 acres. All variance requests are in order to provide a maximum setback for parking and structure from Nine Mile Creek. These variance requests may have merit since the parking can still be screened from County Road #67 and the proponent will be utilizing a cross-access easement for parking along the east property line. The proponent aill also be merging an existing access with the neighboring access, creating a safer situation for the county road. Since the property to the east can . only provide a 20-foot drive isle for the proposed easterly parking, a one-way situation will be necessary to meet City Code for drive isle width (see Attachment A). The proponent indicates that he has obtained a cross-access easement for this drive isle. Prior to building permit issuance, Staff will require review of the easement and proof of filing at Hennepin County. Shoreland Ordinance The Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts Nine Mile Creek as a General Development Water. Even though this section of Nine Mile Creek Is basically a dry creekbed, the DNR classifies the Ordinary High Water Mark of creeks as being at the top of the bank of the channel. In this instance, that elevation would be 908. Since this property Crosstown Prairie Office/Warehouse 3 September 9, 1988 was zoned I-2 prior to the adoption of the Shoreland Ordinance in 1982, variances to the Shoreland Ordinance will be necessary for this property to develop. The following variances have heen identified: 1. Structure setback from the Ordinary High Water Mark of 150 feet down to 33 feet. 2. Impervious surface setback from the Ordinary High Water Mark from 50 feet down to 0 feet. 3. Impervious surface in excess of 30% at 35.6%. 4. Minimum lot size less than 5 acres at 1.89 acres. As mentioned earlier, this property would be undevelopable if all shoreland criteria were met based on the perameters set forth on this site. Mitigating reasons for variances to the Shoreland Ordinance could include that the property was zoned I-2 prior to the adoption of the Shoreland Ordinance, the site cannot be developed based upon the Shoreland Ordinances, the building FAR has been greatly reduced, a perpetual easement to preserve the existing vegetation along the creek will be provided, and the parking areas can still he adequately screened from the County Road. Grading and Drainage This site gradually slopes from County Road 067 to the south and southwest with steeper slopes of 2:1 along the creekbank. Dense lowland vegetation exists along the creek slopes which will oe preserved as part of the site development. Minimal site grading is proposed on the property with grade tying into the 908 contour. Storm water run-off will maintain a similar drainage pattern and will be picked up by a series of catch basins which will be directed to an outlet to Nine Mile Creek. Utilities Sanitary sewer and water are available to this site with connection to an 8-inch waterline along County Road 067 and connection to a 8-inch sanitary sewer trunk running along the southwest corner of the property. The proponent will need permission from the neighboring property to the east for construction of this sanitary sewer connection. The existing fire hydrant along County Road 067 will require relocation due to the shift in the access to the property. All existing wells shall be capped and any existing septic systems removed prior to grading permit issuance. • Landscaping/Screening City Code defines a single-story building, which is in excess of 20 feet in height, a two-story structure for the purposes of determining the total caliper inches required. Based on calculations, a total of 120 caliper inches of trees are required on this site. The proponent will be required to revise the landscaping plan to meet the minimum caliper inch requirement. Additional screening will be necessary along the southeast corner of the property to better screen the loading and parking areas. The proponent should provide berming and additional landscaping along the 25-foot front yard setback area to screen parking from the county road. A berm of approximately 4 feet can be installed (see Attachment A). A rooftop Crosstown Prairie Office/Warehouse 4 September 9, 1988 f mechanical screening diagram has been provided which indicates the use of wood as the major screening element. City Code requires that all rooftop mechanical screening consist of pre-finished metal, wood lamenated with metal, or other building material architecturally integral to the building. The proponent shall revise the rooftop mechanical screening plan prior to City Council review. Architecture The proposed 23-foot building is to be constructed with standard raked and exposed aggregate pre-cast concrete panels and metal entrance canopies. All entrances will be re,.. ed into the building. Loading areas are proposed to be screened from the creek corridor with the preservation of the existing mass of vegetation along the creekbank. Additional landscaping will be necessary for screening of the loading area and parking from the creek near the southeast corner. This should be accomplished with lowland types of vegetation. Access Both existing access points to this property are proposed to be relocated. The westerly access will be shifted further west approximately 60 feet, while the easterly access will merge with the neighboring property in order to eliminate one of two access points, creating a safer situation for County Road #67. As mentioned earlier, a 0 lot line setback for driveway will be necessary. The proponent indicates that he has obtained a cross-access easement for this access. Staff review of the easement and proof of filing at Hennepin County will be required prior to building permit issuance. These access points will create no site line problems for County Road #67. Summary Although many variances are being requested for this property, it could not develop without variances to City Code. This remnant piece of property was zoned I-2 prior to the adoption of the Shoreland Ordinance. These ordinances would prohibit the site from developing at all. Staff feels that the site plan as presented works well considering the site constraints. The proponent has made many revisions to the plan based on previous meetings which include a decrease in FAR from 29% to 24.7%, parking setback from creek centerline from 10 feet to an average now of approximately 38 feet, preserving all existing vegetation along the creek (Attachment A). Other improvements, including the hardsurfacing of the parking area and the provision of an on-site stone sewer system, will greatly enhance the property. The construction of this project would improve the appearance of this property by removing 3 separate structures, including a metal pole barn and providing the City with an attractive industrial building typical of Eden Prairie standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff would recommend approval of the Site Plan Review within the 1-2 District on 1.89 acres with variances and shoreland variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Preliminary Plat of 1.89 acres into 1 lot and road right-of-way subject to plans dated August 22, and August 25, 1988, this Staff Report, and the following: Crosstown Prairie Office/Warehouse 5 September 9, 1988 1. Prior to City Council review, proponent shall: A. Revise the site plan to include an additional 4 parking stalls, design easterly parking stalls for a one-way situation to meet City Code. B. Revise the landscape plan to provide for a total of 120 caliper inches of plant material consistent with City Code which includes additional screening from County Road #67 and the loading and parking area in the southeast corner of the site, also provide a screening berm as shown in Attachment A to screen parking from County Road #67. C. Revise the rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan to conform with City Code. 2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall: A. Receive approval from the Board of Appeals for variance as outlined in this Staff Report. B. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. C. Submit detailed utility, storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. 3. Prior to Grading permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Stake the grading limits with snow fencing to protect trees to be preserved. B. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. C. Cap all existing wells and remove any septic systems. 4. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Provide the City with proof of filing at Hennepin County, a cross- access easement for ingress and cy: .,, along the east property line. B. Submit colors samples for the building and site lighting details which minimize off-site glare. C. Pay Cash Park Fee. \. ---- ‘,,._ -- - - _ ---_. i ../ -'"-•••----1 -\ C',t, / /1 •-•,. I , ,• •--. io 1 29 2 FA.R 2i, ,/ i 312.41 i / * = original plan _ , ___- r IMIIIIIIM (11; •-____\ _.____L.011.1•011Y _R.,DAII_AR - 44046„ I . `-- - Op ... .."-",..,14,. ..... .• /v6.. ---,---......:....•,"----,•,,,,.. ,, (0, 1 .,,f ;#. --- ,...............:,......,-,-..„,,,\‘-`,.„•,,,:.,..,.\:,,,,c,•(,,, '''\\ \ If • , .-•-•-.-I current plan 2 - , -, 19,zico_ 1.-- I3 I 1 CD 11 .___ 7-Th, ) ----, , E,,,...r. ..c -I ( \ \ \ \ \ CD \ c.DvN 1,-••( ROM) R 0 w CD • • • • • • E. CROSSTOWN PRAIRIE OFFICE WAREHOUSE,by Gary A.Hilden. Request for Site Plan Review on 1.89 acres within the I-2 Zoning District with variances and Shoreland variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals,Preliminary Plat of 1.89 acres into one lot and road right-of-way for construction of a 19,216 square foot office warehouse. Location: South of County Road 67,east of Nine Mile Creek,north of the Chicago, ' • Milwaukee,St.Paul&Pacific Railroad. A public hearing. Franzen reported that all properties in this area were industrial land uses,zoned 1-2 in 1969 per a City Ordinance. The property was the home of A&H Welding,Inc.,which has operated for 20 years on the site. The site contains three buildings and the portion of Nine Mile Creek that abuts this property has been a dry creekbed for years. The request was for a preliminary plat of 1.89 acres into 1 lot and road right-of-way. The portion of drainage and utility easement that abuts Nine Mile Creek would be placed into a perpetual easement in favor of the City for creek protection and maintenance purposes. Although City Code was two acres for a minimum lot size with the 1-2 zoning district,this property was zoned prior to the area plat and therefore a variance was required for 1.89 acres. Gary Hilden,owner of A&H Welding,stated that the project would be to construct a 19,216 square foot building on 1.78 net acres of land. He intends to occupy 9,200 square feet of the building and lease the remaining space for office/warehouse uses. He wanted to thank the Staff for being so cooperative in this project. 22'19 Eden Prane Planning Commission Meeting September 12,1988 Page 7 Franzen added that the Staff Report listed the variances needed. Due to this being a remnant piece of property, four variances for setbacks,driveway setback and lot size are required and have merit in view of the fact that the parking can still be screened form County Road#67 and the proponent can utilize a cross-access easement for parking along the east property line. The proponent has obtained a cross-access easement for the drive isle. Franzen reported that even though the section of Nine Mile Creek on this property was basically a dry creekbed,the DNR classifies the Ordinary High Water Mark of creeks as being at the top of the bank of the channel. In view of the fact that 1-2 zoning was designated prior to the Shoreland Ordinance of 1982,variances are required for this • property to develop. 1)structure setback from the high water mark,2)impervious surface setback,3)impervious surface in excess of 30%,and 4)minimum lot size less than 5 acres. Franzen added that if the proponent had to meet all City Code requirements,only a 2000 square foot building could be built on the site. Franzen pointed out that the Staff Recommendations list additional berming to screen parking, iteeeeeee parking by 4 spaces,and revise the rooftop mechanical equipment screening to conform with City Code. Ruebling asked if the County Road 62 improvements will go over the tracks. Proponent replied that as far as he knew,the bridge would go over the tracks. Dodge inquired if granting of the variances were in anyway precedent setting. Franzen replied if it could be demonstrated that if the variances are unique to the property and the application of the code created hardships so that the property could not be put to a reasonable use,the granting of the variances would not set a precedent. With the character of the creekbed being dry,Staff was not as concerned with Shoreland variances than if it was lower Purgatory Creek. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Fell and seconded by Ruebling to close the public hearing on the request of Crosstown , Prairie Office Warehouse. Motion carried 7-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Fell and seconded by Ruebling to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Gary A.Hilden for site plan review on 1.89 acres within the 1-2 Zoning District,with site variances and Shoreland ' Management variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals,for construction of Crosstown Prairie Office Warehouse,based on plans dated August 25,1988,subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 9,1988. Motion carried 7-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Fell and seconded by Ruebling to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Gary A.Hilden for Preliminary Plat of 1.89 acres into one lot and road right-of-way for construction of a 19.216 sq.It. office/warehouse to be known as Crosstown Prairie Office Warehouse, based on plans dated August 25,1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 9,1988. Motion carried 7-0-0 • • 22760 3 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN CDUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 088-227 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF BLUESTEM HILLS 5TH ADDITION FOR BRDWN LAND CDMPANY WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Bluestem Hills 5th Addition Development by Brown Land Company and considered their request for approval for development (and variances) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on October 4, 1988; NOW, THEREFORE, BY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Bluestem Hills 5th Addition by Brown Land Company, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, is legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Development approval as outlined in the plans, as revised, dated September 30, 1988. 3. That the PUD Development meet the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated September 26, 1988. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 4th day of October, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • 227 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE �( HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 9 RESOLUTION #88-228 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BLUESTEM HILLS 5TH ADDITION FOR BROWN LAND COMPANY BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the prel iminary plat of Bluestem Hills 5th Addition for Brown Land Company, dated September 29, 1988, consisting of 12.83 acres into 15 single family lots, 3 outlots, and road right-of-way, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 4th day of October, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: September 23, 1988 PRO,IECI: Bluestem Hills 5th Addition LOCATION: West of Bluestem Lane, north of Purgatory Creek APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Brown Land Company REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 15.92 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 15.92 acres with waivers for street frontage. 3. Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.5 on 10.57 acres. 4. Zoning District Amendment within the existing RI-13.5 Zoning District on 2.26 acres. 5. Preliminary Plat of 12.83 acres into 15 single family lots, 3 outlots, and road right-of-way. Background _".I C a• This site is formerly known as the 1'JJ R -2.,5 \ jJ Bluestem Hills 4th Addition which was reviewed by the Planning ,o"C w�; , c "u Commission in August, 1987. The ''; ��� :,,L__11,71._Planning Commission had recommended _ Illt, , � ik . approval of the subdivision, but i- N ,\ '/_ 1l expressed concern about the in- ,1,,, , <i;- -1 / �i .,R1-2 P tensity of the project and the U, . .��- r " '"" :'r"';�_" development on steep slopes which """" ,��• I1 -^• _;4 1'� a . VT. relied relied on the use of retaining walls x qs• andprivate covenants to :1-, guarantee `RyW� i ,f that the plan would be built as ---1 — • proposed. The Commission discussed PROPOSED SITE, ._ •_ 1=2 the issue of developing a policy for 7.- rt 1 development on steep slopes and in I \ ���.��00.frog 1t•n=' " wooded areas. • •••1:1ed.ii•R �3. _ I MI d1l:.f The project was subsequently re- .i 1 \ 1S.I viewed at the City Council at two '� j,. • N,g 1+R ,,�+. _,a. a �AREA LOCATION MAP L. • Bluestein Hills 5th Addition 2 September 23, 1988 ), meetings before the developer withdrew the item. The City Council expressed the same reservations as the Planning Commission with regards to the intensity of site development and restrictive covenants. Site Plan A portion of this property is currently zoned R1-13.5 (2.26 acres) and there will be a replat of this previously zoned and platted land to accommodate a different lotting pattern with larger lots. There is also a second request to rezone approximately 10.57 acres of land from Rural to R1-13.5, Within the 12.83 acres of land proposed for subdivision review, the previous plan had 19 lots at a gross density of 1.69 units per acre, and a net density of 2.17 units per acre. The current plan involves 15 single family lots at a gross density of 1.17 units per acre and a net density of 1.59 units per acre with 2.25 acres proposed by the developer to be dedicated to the City along Purgatory Creek. All of the lots meet the minimum requirements of the R1-13.5 Zoning District, with the exception of Lot 5, Block 1, which is a flag lot. The City Code would require that all lots have a minimum frontage of 55 feet on a cul-de-sac. The original Bluestem 4th plan had a flag lot configuration and a similar waiver request through a PUD. Reasons for considering the PUD waiver would be if the granting of the waiver would result in a better environmentally designed subdivision for the City than if no waiver was granted at all. Also it should be considered if there are significant trade-offs or benefits to the City for considering the waiver. Potential trade-offs would be the dedication of 2.25 acres of land which is in excess of the ordinance minimum requirements of 1.2 acres, the provision of conservancy easements across the back of the lots to preserve the slopc5, and the low net density of the project at 1.59 units per acre. The subdivision meets the minimum requirements of the Shoreland Ordinance. Overall Road System The location of the east/west road on this site impacts the development of the adjacent undeveloped land to the north and west of this site. The undeveloped area is owned by several people, primarily Wallace Hustad. This concept plan is not submitted for any specific review by the Planning Commission, but represents one way in which the surrounding land area could develop in conjunction with Bluestem Hills 5th Addition. The attached letter from Wallace Hustad indicates cooperation in the construction of the common roadway along the north property line. The overall road system is planned with connections to Bennett Place and Purgatory Ridge Road to the north. The location of the proposed roadway and cul-de-sacs are planned in appropriate locations that will minimize grading in the future while providing for an efficient lotting pattern. Site Grading The grading plan for the Bluestem Hills 4th Addition relied heavily on the use of retaining walls and additional courses of block to accommodate the development plan as proposed. There was a considerable amount of cut on the north end of the property and substantial amounts of fill in the ravines, south of the proposed roadway. By reducing the number of lots within the area from 19 on the original plan to 15 in this proposal, allows for larger lots and more room to site building pads to minimize filling within the ravines. �ar� • Bluestem Hills 5th Addition 3 September 23, 1988 Two retaining walls are necessary to accommodate the proposed development. One is on Lot 4, 81ock 1, which is to the rear of the house, and one is along a private driveway on Lots 5 and 6, Block 1. The proposed retaining wall on Lot 4 varies between 0 to 8 feet in height and is proposed to be constructed out of limestone. A detailed grading plan shows how the water would be directed away from the top of the walls. Water which flows directly over the top of the retaining walls is the main reason why the retaining walls fail during periods of high water run-off. The proposed retaining wall along the private drive on Lot 5 and 6 varies from 0 to a maximum of 8 feet in height. These walls will require a building permit and should be certified by a structural engineer. Since the amount of additional buildable area beyond the house pads on proposed Lots 4, 5, and 6, is limited, houses must be built exactly in the location as shown on the proposed plan, otherwise there would be encroachment into the Conservancy Area with additional natural slope alteration and tree loss. To assure compliance with the proposed grading plan, it is recommended that the retaining walls be constructed concurrent with street construction and site grading so that the future owners of the proposed parcels will understand the extent of grading limits. Tree Loss The tree inventory indicates a total of 1,697 caliper inches of oak trees on-site. There will be 229 caliper inches of oak tree loss or 13.5% Tree replacement would be 40 inches. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall provide a tree replacement plan for 40 inches. Our field experience so far on single family projects indicate 10% more tree removal than anticipated at time of subdivision review. This is because construction limits in the field are not as tight as shown and larger homes are built indifferent locations than shown at time of review. This may mean that actual tree loss for this project would be 17%. Additional trees lost due to construction would be replaced on a caliper inch bases. The east/west road shares a common boundary between the Bluestem project and the Hustad site to the north, and there will be some grading on adjoining property which will result in tree loss. The tree loss, as a result of the shared roadway would be attributed to the project area to the north and replaced concurrent with the development of the adjoining site. Parks, Trails, and Conservancy Area of Purgatory Creek Refer to comments in the attached memorandum from the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Department. Utilities Sanitary sewer and water is available to this site. Storm water run-off will drain into Purgatory Creek. The storm sewer pipe outlet into Purgatory Creek will have to be sized to accommodate a much larger land area to the north. A detailed tree inventory will be needed along the proposed storm sewer alignment into Purgatory Creek. Any trees lost or result of the construction, will have to be replaced on an area inch per area inch basis. Bluestem Hills 5th Addition 4 September 23, 1988 Conclusions The shift in the roadway to the north was one of the original suggestions by the City Staff as a way in which large houses could develop in a sloped wooded area. This, combined with a reduction in total lots from 19 to 15, allows for larger lots and greater developable area while minimizing encroachment onto the slopes. Tree loss, at 13.5% is half as much tree loss as the original plan. Three lots rely on the use of retaining walls. It is important that these walls be constructed concurrent with street construction so that the future home buyers are aware of the development restrictions on-site. This will minimize grading and tree loss. The use of the flag lot with a street frontage of 20 feet, requires a waiver through the PUD, since the ordinance requirement is 55 feet of frontage. The area in which the flag lot is located is on top of the slope and does not impact significant trees. The flag lot also requires the change in the conservancy line which is acceptable to the Parks and Recreation Staff since 2.25 acres of land is being dedicated and scenic easements will be placed across the rear of the lots to preserve the oak trees on the slopes. There is a signed letter from Wally Hustad indicating an agreement with the Brown Land Company that the alignment of Bluestem Lane as shown is an appropriate solution for both projects. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Review, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers for lot frontage, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 10.57 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the R1-13.5 District on 2.26 acres, and a Preliminary Plat of 12.93 acres into 15 lots, based on plans dated September 20, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report, dated September 23, 1988, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council review, proponent shall: A. Submit a tree replacement plan for 40 caliper inches. B. Revise the plat to show sidewalks, trails, and land dedication according to the Parks and Recreation memo. 2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall: A. Provide detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Provide detailed storm water run-off and utility plans for review by the City Engineer. 3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee. B. Developer proposes to dedicate to the City Outlot A. This should be • deeded free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, and mortgages. as�� Bluestem Hills 5th Addition 5 September 23, 198B C. Dedicate proposed Outlot C to the City free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, and mortgages. 4. Prior to Grading Permit issuance, the developer should notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. The proposed construction limits should be staked with a snow fence. 5. The retaining walls on Lots 4, 5, and 6, should be constructed concurrent with street construction. These retaining walls will require a building permit and certification by a structural engineer. 6. Construction of sidewalks and trails as recommended in the Parks and Recreation memo. „a3' I Hustad DEVELOPMENT September 20, 1988 To: Mayor of Eden Prairie City Council of Eden Prairie Eden Prairie City Staff I have reviewed the proposed Blue Stem Fifth Addition preliminary plat and am in agreement with Brown Land Company that the alignment of Blue Stem Lane, as shown, is an appropriate solution for both parties. Hustad Development Corporation is committed to the dedication of its share of the necessary right of way and agrees to share in the cost of installing the necessary improvements. ' By° /���9�� Title: Q4.44, Enclosure: Exhibit "A" • 22n' f 7460 Market Place Drive•Eden Prairie,MN 55344 941-4383 ( MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barbara Penning Cross; Landscape Architect DATE: September 22, 19B8 SUBJECT: Parks, Recreation & Natural Resource Issues Within Bluestem Fifth Addition The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Staff has reviewed the prelimin- ary plans for Bluestem Hills Fifth Addition and have the following comments: The existing conservancy line which was approved by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission has been slightly realigned. The proposed conservancy line has been extended outward on the ridge containing lots 5 & 6, but extends inward towards the houses on lots 1,3,4,7,10,11,12 and 13. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Staff feel the proposed conserv- ancy line actually follow the contours better and protects more of the exist- ing vegetation and endorses the proposed conservancy line. Outlot A in the southeast part of the site is approximately two acres and will be dedicated to the City. Staff is also recommending dedication of outlot C as shown on the attached map. This new alignment of lot lines more closely follows the creek valley contours and better protects that natural resource. The recommendations for trail systems are shown on the attached plan. A five foot concrete sidewalk is already in place along the west side of Bennet Place and along the south side of Jackson Drive. The importance of a trail system in this area is to allow access through the neighborhoods to the proposed creek crossing northwest of this project. Staff is projecting most of the pedestrian traffic to flow from the proposed creek crossing southeast towards Franlo Park along Jackson Drive. The sidewalk system for Bluestem Fifth Add- ition should meet these demands by extending the sidewalk along Bennet Place and then along the north side of the proposed roadway as shown in the attached plan. The sidewalk system for the proposed subdivision to the north has been shown but plans for this area are preliminary and subject to change. • ),aa61 /-1 . .. • ,.',. '',.-'-_-_'-:: -.__:..---z. • 1 • N. \,,.„-, ____-,-/ ..__:.. .,,.--- , i. • \ . 13 \ ' N,.. • -Y‘ '1., - I , \ • - %, 1 °I . f \ ,.. \ Z- \ \ , •..:. ,..s•,,s\ ... , i / ( \ -- ...\ , . . .. ', —---- ' 1,,,;."-. /- / ..;7,-- ' "' • r / • . . N',`,. .. ' ) 7 / fr,:),„ ri-':', ..' '' • .- • \•••• .... ., ',------ ._-- '\ /-t % . •• ? • ...,„• :i.,.::,,r,\ ; - . ----.. y.. N.\-\\ . • . . • . . ,. , % • . --T,' - . •• . --N. . .• . - • '•\--,. - - -:--- \ ,..:-...:.:...:•:::::..::...,..,::....:•::::::......:*-.....::::-:::::..::::N:„.:.:::.1 . •\,-- • , ,,. o,s,,,, . .. .::::::me.,.:.:•..........: ..:..:: :::.::.].:r:: :, -. .:::::::. ..:ro,i.::;:4.f..f.:::::ts:::.::::::::::,:... ::: 1 . 1.: ... poi.•:::.:.....:... .:..:..A.,:..:,:::.. :....,::::,.:............:...,..1 . -, .,..., 1 \ • • - .::AiH:.•;:.:•.::U .;...]::.,„..4. 1.ti* . , ------r 1 -: *,!,::::.,N:•:•::,,,.7.:.::.:..... , -..:,.:......1.., • . . p 1,..., I : (N : :i:i::::.i:4:tij::::.':-....:•:•...-.:.-..-.........::.:1::,,:. ...i.,::,....:.....,j ....., -__ ..t..... ...... . : . v ..• • • .:.:R:: :::.::.... :.::::....:;i:'."'''''')i.!`it.....••,,;,.. la N 1:' . t"Zr ‹....;::::.:.:.:.:,..:...:..•,:.„........„,.,_ , ., ,,., „,„:„,:„,,,::::. ::._.. „ ._. , .... .........."4,,k::::.:.:•::::::•:•:•:••••••:•:•....:•::::1:::::,:..:-.... ...-. . . _. 1-- .-CN :.:.:.....:.:-...:c.i.;.:.:.::-....''.::•.:-::::::•:::.;;;::.. -4•....i..4:::::::::-.......: , _ - —1 g:.) ...../. ::':"..V..:..:..::••::''''::.:..i..".. .:1:it' ;:-. . ?.. _i_ - o . rd - ii.:11 .-.:.. ]:::• ••:.::.'....:...y. ..........: :.'.::.:t .t:.....t...:i 1 i' ,r--,-k is- 1.......... . . sT v g 1 -4 1 1 ' )-..... • . :::-.....:•=7:3,..4........ 21:., '. ...., I i• ''—r.".46,....__ 1 \ I / ;.::::::::::::::.:.::::...1:"V.V t•• ;':,._,!---/ — 1 i i . ,• •.;]::: ::::'•47.:.::::: ::::',0i 7.' : I ' ' .._ ./,; I j: '' ••',.,00° ,-4' — • / - • -- . ' - • 1 It 4,_ . • , . ‘ 1 :.:: . .....(f:,::,... ,•,, • ( ; 1_••• \ 1 § *. (i •• ,i.c,'.7.„ -‘--, / ..*--, `':.::';:;...... i,--1,-- : -** .. N_Z-:4 C p. ,. , : -...;_,• ,.....:: •. , .... , ....7....... • ... ..___ . ,....,... r , ... , . ...: I .. , _.: -F.-......... ...-. --•-- • -\ :----- /. :- i ..:,.........?::.:::::::::: ..11:• • / ......... ........::::::::,::: ,_., _ . " , .......*LACE . ' • ‘;',.. .,.. . 2290 Eden Prime Planning commission Meeting Minutes September 20, VMS Page 2 DRAFT MINUTES B. BLUESTEM 5TH ADDITION, by Brown Land Company. Request for PUD Concept Review on 15.92 acres,Planned Unit Development District Review on 15.92 acres,with waivers,and Zoning District Amendment within the R1-13.5 Zoning District on 2.26 acres,Preliminary Plat of 12.83 acres into 15 single family lots,three outlots,and road right-of-way. Location: West of Bluestem Lane,north of Purgatory Creek. A public hearing. Bob Smith,representative for the proponent,described the project in detail. He referred to the prior approval in August of 1987 by the Commission and their concern about the intensity of the project, the steep slopes within the development and the use of retaining walls. The project was removed from the agenda until the proponent could come up with a design that satisfied the City. The original plan was for 19 lots. The redesign being presented was for 15 lots,and tree loss is minimal. To save even more trees,the proponent was proposing a new conservancy line extending the area to protect the environment and trees. Brown Land Company and Husted Development will jointly share in providing the necessary right of way and the cost of installing the necessary improvements for the alignment of Blue Stem Lane. Smith spoke of the wall construction consisting of large limestone rocks. He concluded that they were in concurrence with the Staff Report and recommendations. Franzen reported that the Parks and Recreation Department have requested trails and sidewalks in the Bluestem 5th Addition project. At the present time,the plans are preliminary and subject to change.If in fact they are altered,did the Commission wish to review the final trail systems proposed. Franzen continued that the Parks and Recreation did feel that moving the conservancy line did allow for added flexibility. There were two items that needed to be met prior to approval:1)tree 22,9 � Eden Prairie Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 26, I9S8 Page 3 replacement plan,and 2)the revised plans to show parks,sidewalks and trails. He commented that there would be land dedication to the City along the creek. The retaining wails will be a test of time, and will be observed and inspected by a structural engineer. He pointed out that the greatest fear of the retaining wall would be from heavy rains washing the wall down. Ruebling pointed out that frequently in projects such as this,there is 10%more tree loss than projected. He asked Staff if that came from the damage to surrounding trees. Franzen replied that although this is common,many times when a home is actually built on the lot,it will be 20 to 30 feet longer than anticipated requiring the removal of more trees. In this particular project to come in with 5-10%is a lot better than Staff had thought it would be. Franzen continued that if the City felt a developer was being flagrant in tree removal and/or loss,they would be required to come before the City Council because they would be in violation of the agreement. Schuck inquired what the price range and square footage for the proposed homes would be. Brown replied they were anticipating a price range of$300,000-500,000 homes and 3000-5000 square footage. The house pad will be 65'deep and 75'wide. Carol Burnett,9940 Bennett Place,wanted to know where her property was in conjunction wit the proposed project and if in fact it would be in her back yard. Mr.Smith illustrated to her on the plat the site of her home and the development. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Schuck to close the public hearing. Motion carried 4-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Schuck to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Brown Land Company for Planned Unit Development Concept on 15.92 acres for Bluestem Hills 5th Addition,based on plans dated September 23,1988,subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 23,1988. Motion carried 4-0-0. MOTION 3: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Schuck to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Brown Land Company for Planned Unit Development District Review,with waivers, on 15.92 acres and Zoning District Amendment within the R1-13.5 District on 2.26 acres,for Bluestem Hills 5th Addition,based on plans dated September 23,1988,subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 23, 1988. Motion carried 4-0-0. MOTION 4: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Schuck to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Brown Land Company for Preliminary Plat of 12.83 acres into 15 single family lots, three outlots,and road right-of-way for Bluestem Hills 5th Addition,based on plans dated September 23,1988,subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 23, 1988. Motion carried 4-0-0. 22_9 L • - 1 VAC 88-08 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-215 VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS OVER PARTS OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK I FOREST KNOLLS WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain drainage and utility easements described as follows: That part of Lot 1, Block I, Forest Knolls, lying East of a line parallel to and five feet West of the Easterly boundary thereof, as measured perpendicular to said Easterly boundary; That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Forest Knolls, lying West of a line parallel to and five feet East of the Westerly boundry thereof, as measured perpendicular to said Westerly boundry; All located in Township 116, Range 22 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on October 18, 1988, after due notice was published and posted as required by law; WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said drainage and utility easements are not necessary and have no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 1. Said drainage and utility easements as above described are hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a Notice of Completion of the proceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on October 18, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 22-933 VAC 88-09 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-216 VACATION OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS OVER PARTS OF LOTS 6 AND 7, BLDCK 1 COACHMANS LANDING FIFTH ADDITION WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain drainage and utility easements described as follows: A 20.00 foot wide easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under and across Lot 6, Block 1, Coachmans Landing Fifth Addition, according to the record plat thereof, drawn from a point on the west line of said Lot 6 distant 95.00 feet south of the northwest corner thereof to a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 6 distant 15.50 feet southeasterly of the northeast corner thereof; and A 20.00 foot wide easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under and across Lot 7, Block 1, Coachmans Landing Fifth Addition, according to the record plat thereof, drawn from a point on the westerly line of said Lot 7 distant 15.50 feet southeasterly of the northwest corner thereof to a point on the eastline of said Lot 7 distant 4D.00 feet southwesterly of the northeast corner thereof. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on October 18, 1988, after due notice was published and posted as required by law; WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said drainage and utility easements are not necessary and have no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 1. Said drainage and utility easements as above described are hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a Notice of Completion of the proceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on October 18, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 2�94/ OCTOBER 4,1988 45672 ERVIN C HOFSTEDT REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 45673 HERBERT JOHNSON MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 187.00 674 DANA GIBBS SERVICE-PACKET DELIVERY38.00 { J675 IPMA MINNESOTA CHAPTER CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES 138.00 45676 CEDAR HILLS GOLF COURSE CITY PICNIC/FEES PAID 24.00 89 45677 AT&T SERVICE 532.00 45678 YVONNE BAUNE 32.21 REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 19.00 45679 COURTNEY BRIDEN REFUND-SKATING LESSONS 45680 NANCY CAUDILL REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 37.00 45681 YIP CHAN 20.00 45682 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE AUGUST BBIFUELG9 LESSONS TAX 45683 JAN LUOMA REFUNO-SWIMMING LESSONS 374.60 45684 SHARON MACDONALD 30.00 45685 CATHY MC CONNELL REFUND-SCIBAILG LESSONS 30.00 REFUND SCUBA LESSONS 110.00 45686 STUART MC CONNELL REFUND-SCUBA LESSONS 45687 MINNEGASCO 110.00 45688 NSP SERVICE 240.74 SERVICE 262.32 45689 KENNETH POTTS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 2.75 45690 SOFTWARE PUBLISHING DISTRIBUTION SOFTWARE UPGRADE-POLICE DEPT 45691 SUNSHINE FOUNDATION SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 2 7.95 45692 SUPPLEE ENTERPRISES INC SIGN-LIQUOR STORE 27.95 45693 DEP,WOOD TWIGG 300.00 45694 U S WEST CELLULAR INC REFUND-SKATING LESSONS 6.00 SERVICE 168.65 45695 VADA ALDRIDGE REFUND-ADULT PROGRAMS 16.50 45696 JOAN CLARK REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 24.00 45697 CAROL DOLLY REFUND-ADULT PROGRAMS 16.50 45698 DAN DONOVAN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 24.00 4`699 GRETCHEN DORR REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS '00 MILDREO GRENKE REFUND-ADULT PROGRAMS 33.50 4a701 EVA HIRT REFUND-ADULT PROGRAMS 16.50 45702 VIOLET LAPPIN 16.50 45703 ARDIS MC EARTHY REFUND ADULT PR 16.50 45704 LUCILLE NOTERMANN REFUND ADULT GRAMS PROGRAMS 16.50 REFUND-RACQUETBALL LESSONS 5.00 45705 ROBERT PETERSON REFUND-RACQUETBALL LESSONS 45706 PRAVIN RANGNEKAR REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 5.00 45707 SUE ROGERS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 24.00 45708 VICTORIA SCULLY 24.00 45709 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE AUGUST BB SALESTAX MING 71 SONS 24.00 45710 HARMON GLASS -SHADED WINDSHIELDS-WATER DEPT/EQUIPMENT 18797.293.68 MAINTENANCE 45711 SHAKOPEE FORD INC -BEARINGS/CYLINDER/PISTDN/CALIPER/VEHICLE 1045.17 REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 45712 TARGET CALCULATOR-ASSESSING DEPT 45713 KAREN CHRISTENSEN SERVICE-WATER DEPT 69.99 45714 CHRIS ENGER -AUGUST & SEPTEMBER 88 EXPENSES-PLANNING 4452.80 DEPT 41 7.40 45715 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 45716 T N T T SHIRTS-COMMUNITY CENTER 1412.89 45717 CITY-COUNTY CREDIT UNION 675.90 PAYROLL 9/16/BB 1226.00 45718 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 9/21/88 45719 CROW WING COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 10252.37 45720 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 9/16/88 ..52.81 45721 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 9/21/88 25401. 72 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 9/16/88 54465.17 J3 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 4021.00 211.00 12221361 22q� OCTOBER 4,1988 45724 ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION PAYROLL 9/16/88 1204.24 "5725 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 9/16/88 211.50 726 MN SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE CONFERENCE-FORESTRY DEPT 35.00 .15727 AT&T SERVICE 236.29 45728 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV SERVICE 150.95 45729 AT&T SERVICE 831.75 45730 MARY ANN BREWER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 24.00 45731 HILDEGARD BRUECKNER REFUND-DEFENSIVE DRIVING 7.00 45732 RUDI BRUECKNER REFUND-DEFENSIVE DRIVING 7.00 45733 BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL RESEARCH CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 265.00 45734 KRISTI DONOVAN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 24.00 45735 DAWN FROSLIE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS L4.00 45736 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 5619.30 45737 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER PROPERTY TAX 116.49 45738 LISA HILK REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 24.00 45739 HOLIDAY INN CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 114.38 45740 INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED LEARNING CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 298.00 45741 JOHNSON BRAS WHOLESALE LIQUOR LIQUOR 3453.44 45742 FLORENCE LYTWYN REFUND-KIDS KORNER 39.00 45743 MCPOA CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 50.00 45744 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC -CONFERENCE-PARK RECREATION & NATURAL 144.50 RESOURCES DEPT 45745 JEREMY MOOT REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 2.00 45746 NARENDRA NADKARNI REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 24.00 45747 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 28621.85 45748 NORTHERN STATES POWER CD SERVICE 9646.10 45749 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO WINE 3165.39 ''50 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 899.80 51 QUALITY WINE CO LIQUOR 2216.85 45752 MICHELLE ROTI REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 10.00 45753 PEARLE VISION REFUND-ROUNO LAKE PARK PAVILION RENTAL 50.00 45754 EVELYN PETERS REFUND-STARING LAKE PARK BUILDIMC RENTAL 15.00 45755 FATHER TIM POWER REFUND-OUTDOOR CENTER RENTAL 40.00 45756 PAT SAHLIE REFUND-ROUND LAKE PARK BUILDING RENTAL 15.00 45757 U 5 WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE 181.59 45758 JIM WALTER PAPERS XEROX PAPER-CITY HALL 507.15 45759 THE WINE COMPANY WINE 114.80 45760 BIRCHWOOD LABORATORIES INC GUN CLEANER-POLICE OEPT 34.93 4576I PETTY CASH EXPENSES-CITY HALL 51.09 45762 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 433.42 45763 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 3884.51 45764 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR LIQUOR 5627.64 45765 PAUSTIS & SONS CO WINE 332.10 45766 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO WINE 2886.72 45767 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 589.99 45768 DUALITY WINE CO LIQUOR 1853.33 45769 MINNESOTA FIRE AGENCIES DUES-FIRE DEPT 35.00 45770 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM AUGUST 88 SAC CHARGES 60984.00 45771 STATE TREASURER AUGUST 88 BLDG SURCHARGE 6351.03 45772 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-CITY HALL 5000.00 45773 RITA L ANDERSON ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 108.00 45774 PRISCILLA A BAILEY ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 105.00 45775 JUDITH E BAKER ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 138.60 '6 BERNADINE BEAUVAIS ELECTION JUOGE WAGES 102.00 4,,,77 CONSTANCE BLAD ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 103.80 14701053 2z°d1 OCTOBER 4,1988 45778 ADELINE M BRAMWELL ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 140.00 45779 LYNN E BRAMWELL ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 100.80 ( 780 JEANNE BRANDT ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 136.50 ,5781 CHERYL BRIDGE ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 105.00 45782 DOLORES BROWN ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 103.60 45783 DOROTHY A CABA ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 103.80 45784 BARBARA CAL ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 164.50 45785 LOIS JANE CAMPBELL ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 105.00 45766 ANN CHEATHAM ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 106.80 45787 FAY CLARK ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 140.00 45788 GERTRUDE DAHLBERG ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 105.00 45789 JANET DAHLF:E ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 105.00 45790 CHRISTINE DODGE ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 99.00 45791 LOUISE J DOUGHTY ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 105.00 45792 VIRGINIA K GARTNER ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 152.60 45793 JULIET A GLEASON ELECTIDN JUDGE WAGES 105.00 45794 KAREN HACKMAN ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 103.80 45795 HELEN D HAUPT ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 140.00 45796 ANNE HAWKINS ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 100.80 45797 CAROL HEGGE ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 100.80 45798 MARY B HELFAND ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 103.80 45799 KATHARINE C HENDRICKSON ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 105.00 45800 BERNICE M HOLASEK ELECTIDN JUDGE WAGES 103.80 45301 ALLENE HOOKOM ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 102.00 45802 ISABELL IVERSON ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 102.00 45803 ELAINE M JACOUES ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 103.80 45804 BILL JELLISON ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 103.80 9,05 SHIRLEY JELLISON ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 131.60 J06 DELORES KLEIN ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 106.80 45807 DAVID C KNAA< ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 102.00 45808 LESTER W LABORE ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 102.00 4E809 ADELINE L LEVIN ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 102.00 45810 NANCY LITTLE ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 102.00 45811 VIOLA E MCLAIN ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 108.00 45812 CAROLE MEIDINGER ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 106.80 45813 MAUREEN S MILLER ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 99.00 45814 RUTH MITAL ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 136.50 45815 JOYCE MYHRE ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 131.60 45816 ALFRED L NELSON ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 99.00 45617 MARION L NESBITT ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 103.80 45816 KATHLYN NICHOLSON ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 102.00 45819 RUTH OLSON ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 102.00 45820 LAUREL PENNEBAKER ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 105.00 45821 JIM RANNOW ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 143.50 45822 LAURINA REIFF ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 99.00 45823 BETTY SCHAITBERGER ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 100.80 45824 ALICE J SCHULTZ ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 105.00 45825 ANNE C THOMAS ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 103.80 45826 IDWAL THOMAS ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 102.00 45827 WALTER THOMPSON ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 99.00 45828 ELAINE UDSTUEN ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 103.80 45829 MARY UPTON ELECTION JUOGE WAGES 102.00 45830 BARBARA VANDERPLOEG ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 135.10 71 MELDDY VILLARS ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 102.00 ,_032 MERRILL WATSON ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 102.00 608550 229S0 OCTOBER 4,1988 45833 MARIE WITTENBERG ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 103.80 45834 ETHYL L WOKASCH ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 102.00 5835 JO ANN WRONSKI ELECTION JUDGE WAGES 138.60 45836 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER CARPET FAN RENTAL-POLICE BUILDING 25.44 45837 ABCO CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC CURB STOPS-HIDDEN PONDS PARK/RED ROCK PARK 2583.00 45838 ROBIN ABRAHAM REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 22.65 • 45839 ACE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 224.70 45640 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 526.91 45941 ACTION MAILING SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 18.00 45842 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS -SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- 252.20 POLICE DEPT 45843 AIRSIGNAL INC PAGER SERVICE-FIRE DEPT/POLICE DEPT 264_00 45844 RAY ALLEN MANUFACTURING CD INC BADGES-POLICE DEPT 14.67 45845 AMERICAN EXCELSIOR CO -EROSION CONTROL MAT/STAPLES-HIDDEN GLEN 1919.20 PARK 45846 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BOND PAYMENT 7I6.69 45947 EARL F ANDERSEN S ASSOC INC -PLAYSTRUCTUREiSWING SET-315000.00-LAKE 15786.00 EDEN PARK/SIGN POSTS-$796.00-WATER DEPT 45848 JERRY ANDERSON HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 84.00 45849 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE 1369.53 45950 ASTLEFORD INTL INC GASKET/TRUCE; REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 166.30 4585I BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC -BATTERIES/LAMPS/FUSES/MUFFLER CLAMPS/WIRE 333.89 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 45352 JOHN BENSON GDLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 180.00 45853 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY SERVICE-CITY HALL 474.50 45854 RIFFS INC WASTE DISPOSAL-FIRE DEPT/PARK MAINTENANCE 1038.75 45855 BLACK & VEATCH SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION 8150.27 ''856 BUCKINGHAM DISPOSAL INC SEPTEMBER 88 TRASH DISPOSAL 849.00 357 JOHN D BULTMAN SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 225.00 45858 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE SUBCRIPTION-POLICE DEPT 42.06 45859 ROZ BURNSTEIN EXPENSFB-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND 8.85 45860 CABINETREE VALENCE-SENIOR CENTER RENOVATIDN 13.20 45861 CARLSONS LAKE STATE EQUIP CO SWITCH-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 21.00 45862 RUTH CARR TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 21.00 45863 CARVER COUNTY TREASURER -SERVICE-HWY 212 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 2883.20 STATEMENT & STUDY REPORT 45864 CEDAR HILLS GOLF COURSE GOLF LESSONS/FEES PAID 222.00 45865 CHAPIN PUBLISHING COMPANY LEGAL ADS-WATER DEPT 105.40 45866 CLARK ENGINEERING COMPANY PRINTING-PLANNING DEPT 24.00 45867 CLEVELAND COTTON PRODUCTS PAPER TOWELS-WATER DEPT 91.58 45868 CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SER INC WHEEL BALANCING/SHAFT/SEAL-EQUIPMENT MAINT 324.46 45869 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE LICENSE FEE-ASSESSING DEPT I5.00 45870 COMPUTER PLACE -2 COMPUTERS-32875.04/PRINTER SWITCH/CABLE/ 5348.52 -I PRINTER-31645.00/MOUSE-POLICE -FORFEITURE-DRUGS/OFFICE SUPPLIES/COMPUTER REPAIR-POLICE DEPT 45871 CONE DRIVE OPERATIONS INC OILSEAL-WATER DEPT 345.82 45872 JAN CONRAD -INTERIOR DESIGN SERVICE-FIRE STATIONS #2 200.00 & 3 45873 JEFFREY L CONRADI HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 68.00 45874 CONTACT MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INC RADIO REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50.00 45875 CONTECH CONST PRODUCTS INC CULBERT BAND/BOLT-DRAINAGE CONTROL 668.30 45876 COPY EQUIPMENT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-PLANNING DEPT 3.93 77 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS INC SEPTEMBER 88 INSURANCE CONSULTANT 530.00 ...j78 CROWN AUTO INC -CLEANING SUPPLIES/FLOOR MAT-POLICE BUILDING 43.19 4659E61 • 2295C., 45879 CROWN MARKING INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-ENGINEERING DEPT 8.25 45880 CRYSTAPLEX PLASTICS INC -CLEANING SUPPLIES/HOCKEY GOAL NET-ICE 250.00 ARENA-COMMUNITY CENTER "881 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 6658.30 382 D & K PRINTING PLUS INC PRINTING-SENIOR CITIZENS NEWSLETTER 185.46 45883 DALCO -CLEANING SUPPLIES-POLICE BUILOING/ 1059.70 COMMUNITY CENTER 45884 DELUXE COMPUTER FORMS & SUPPLIES PRINTING VOUCHER CHECKS-FINANCE DEPT 803.65 45885 DEM CON LANDFILL INC WASTE DISPOSAL-STREET MAINTENANCE 180.00 45886 BILL DDLNY DIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 112.00 45887 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU -EXPENSES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT/SENIOR 77.64 CENTER 45888 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER 477.1I 45889 THOMAS E EASTMAN MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 86.75 45890 EDEN PRAIRIE APPLICANCE REFRIGERATOR REPAIR-POLICE BUILDING 60.95 45891 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE -EXPENSES/MEMBERSHIP-COUNCILMEIIBER/ 322.00 ADMINISTRATION 45892 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPT DRIVER TRAINING/EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 500.00 45893 EDEN PRAIRIE GROCERY EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT/FIRE DEPT 795.91 45894 EDEN PRAIRIE LIQUOR EXPENSES-CITY PICNIC 93.36 45895 E P PHOTO FILM/FILM PROCESSING-POLICE DEPT 47.55 `896 CITY OF EDINA SERVICE-AUGUST 88 WATER TESTS 191.50 :397 ELECTRIC AIRE CORPORATION MOTOR-COMMUNITY CENTER 197.84 4589B ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC SAFETY GLASSES/GOGGLES-WATER DEPT 146.36 45899 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC MANHOLE RINGS-DRAINAGE CONTROL 1705.00 45900 FEIST BLANCHARD CO -HUB CAPS/BELTS/ROTOR/TOGGLE SWITCH/PCV 405.09 -VALVE/COIL/VOLT REGULATOR/STARTER BUTTON/ -PRESSURE CAP/STARTER/VALVES/TIE ROO/ , -STEERING STABILIZER/BEARINGS/MASTER CYLINDER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 01 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASS11 TRAINING MANUALS-FIRE DEPT 1724.00 45902 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 287.62 45903 FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS INC PAINT-WATER DEPT 68.26 45904 NICHAEL 0 FRANZLN VCR TAPE/EXPENSES-PLANNING DEPT 8.68 45905 LYNDELL F FREY -POSTAGE-FALL BROCHURE/EXPENSES-SPECIAL 72.14 TRIP/YOUTH TENNIS/AFTERNOON ADVENTURE 45906 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPANY PRDJECTION SCREEN-CITY HALL 218.00 45907 JEANETTE GILLIS EXPENSES-KIDS KORNER 7.64 45908 W W GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC SUMP PUMP REPAIRS-WATER DEPT 756.59 45909 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SERVIC TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/SEWER DEPT 1305.04 45910 W W GRAINGER INC 3 ELECTRIC MOTORS-WATER DEPT 320.67 4591I GRANT MERRITT & ASSOCIATES LTD -AUGUST BB LEGAL SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD 6919.46 LANDFILL 45912 GREATER MINNEAPOLIS AREA BOOK-ASSESSING DEPT 55.00 45913 GREENTREE GRAPHIC PRODUCTS T SHIRTS-FIRE DEPT 345.65 45914 GROSS OFFICE SUPPLY -OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT/XEROX PAPER- 236.93 CITY HALL 45915 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC FLAG LITE-PARK MAINTENANCE 52.59 45916 HACH CO LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 35.20 45917 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSDN INC SERVICE-STARING PARK IMPROVEMENTS 1705.00 45918 HARDRIVES INC LIMESTONE-PARK MAINTENANCE/STREET MAINT 2 45919 HEDMAN SALES & SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES-FINANCE DEPT 19 .4 45920 LAURIE HELLING EXPENSES-SPECIAL EVENT 85.40 45921 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER FILING FEE-PLANNING DEPT 89. 0 400.00 '194B 221 0 OCTOBER 4,1988 i 'S922 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER -2ND HALF 88 PROPERTY TAXES-MORE HOUSE/ 3555.58 HENDRICKSON/MILLER PARK 45923 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS FILING FEE-ENGINEERING DEPT 45924 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER POSTAGE-VOTER REGISTRATION VERIFICATIONS 583.10 6.45925 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT AUGUST 88 BOOKING FEE-POLICE DEPT 216.07 45926 D C HEY CO INC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-PUBLIC WORKS BLDG 2 263.8 45927 SUZANNE HOARN CRAFT INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 70.00 45928 HODGES BADGE COMPANY INC AWARD RIBBONS-SPECIAL EVENTS 63.82 45929 HONEYWELL PROTECTION -4TH QUARTER 88 SECURITY SERVICE-LIQUOR 416.33 STORE 45930 HGFFERS INC FIELD MARKING-PARK MAINTENANCE 45931 HORNET FOUNDATION INC 472.25 45932 HOSE INC BOOMS-WATER DEPT 160.00 HYDRAULIC HOSES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 615.00 45933 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC -TONER/SEPTEMBER & OCTOBER MAINTENANCE 511.38 CITY HALL 45934 I55 INTER SERVICE SYSTEM JANITORIAL SERVICE & SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 152.28 45935 J & R RADIATOR CORP RRDIRTOR REPRIR-SEWER DEPT 52.28 45936 PENNY JESSEN HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 98.00 '5937 ROBBIE JOHNSON TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 5938 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC 7.48 45939 L A CONSTRUCTION INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 100.52 DISTRIBUTOR/TACK OIL-STREET MAINTENANCE 1267.50 45940 ROBERT LAMBERT -SEPTEMBER 88 EXPENSES/DUES-PARKS 318.00 RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES 45941 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC -AUGUST 88 LEGAL SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD 3404.L4 LANDFILL 45942 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD -MAY 88 LEGAL SERVICE/AUGUST 88 FLYING 24400.96 CLOUD LANDFILL ,43 LEEF BROS INC COVERALLS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 67.00 45944 LESMANN ENTERPRISES INC -PAINT & REPAIR POLICE VEHICLES-EQUIPMENT 985.90 MAI 45945 LOUISVILLE LANDFILL INC WASTEENANCE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINT/STREET MAINT 45946 LYMAN LUMBER CO1170.00 TIMBERS/TREATED LUMBER-PARK MAINTENRNCE 164.07 45947 MAUNA DUES-ADMINISTRATION 45948 MARTIN MCALLISTER STRESS TESTS-POLICE DEPT 25.00 295.00 45949 MASYS CORPORATION -OCTOBER 88 COMPUTER MAINTENRNCE AGREEMENT- 1295.00 45950 MATTS AUTO SERVICE INC POLICE DEPT 45951 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO OXYGEN-FIRE PDEPT MENT MAINTENANCE 104.00 45952 METRO PRINTING INC PRINTING-POLICE DEPT 55.80 45953 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMIS OCTOBER 88 SEWER SERVICE CHARGES 607.35 45954 MIDLAND EQUIPMENT CO 136659.60 STEEL PLATE/WELDING-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 59.60 45955 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP/SEALCOATING-STREET MAINTENANCE 45956 MARION MILLER EXPENSES-KIDS KORNER 2572.09 45957 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY BATTERIES-FIRE DEPT 27.00 45958 MN POLICE & PEACE OFFICERS ASSOC DUES-POLICE DEPT 425.00 45959 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC -EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER/ 08.88 2 ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES �OB.BB 45960 MOTOROLA INC RADIO REPAIR-FIRE DEPT 4595I NATIONAL SCREENPRINT PDLO SHIRTS-COMMUNITY CENTER 2298.5 45962 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERV INC EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES 251.64 45963 JP NOREX INC -SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT LAGOON REPAIR OF 15947.68 -MANHOLES-313548.23/REPAIR LEAK-COUNTRY -SIDE DRIVE/REPLACE FIRE HYDRANT-SHADY OAK RD/ O 45964 NORTH KILBRIDE OPTICIANS GOGGLES-FIRERDEPTRLLACE & SHADY OAK ROAD 60.00 19910797 120 OCTOBER 4,1988 q '5965 NORTH STAR TURF INC AXLE PARTS-PARK MAINTENANCE 12.44 9 966 NOTT COMPANY LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 5.70 45967 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC TYPEWRITER REPAIR-CITY HALL 95.45 45968 OLSEN CHAIN 4 CABLE CO INC CABLE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 49.00 45969 OLSON ENTERPRISES ELECTRONIC KEY-POLICE DEPT 49.00 45970 DAVID OSBORNE REFUND-UTILITY BILL 26.35 45971 PACE LABORATORIES INC WATER TESTS-WATER DEPT 54.00 45972 PENNZOIL PRODUCTS COMPANY OIL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 629.40 45973 PEPSI COLA COMPANY CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 341.25 45974 PERSONNEL POOL -SERVICE-BUILDING DEPT/PARKS RECREATION & 195.04 NATURAL RESOURCES 45975 RICK PETERSEN ILLUSTRATIONS FOR FALL BROCHURE/FEES PAID 100.00 45976 PITNEY BDWES -MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-COMMUNITY CENTER/ 1147.08 POSTAGE METER RENTAL-CITY HALL 45977 PLEHAL BLACKTOPPING INC PAVER RENTAL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1530.00 45978 METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL CONTRACTO ICE PIT HEAT LINE REPAIR-ICE ARENA 457.36 45979 POMMER COMPANY INC TROPHIES/PLAQUES-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 304.26 45980 POWER BRAKE EOUIPMENT CO -BRAKES/WATER HEATER/BRAKE CHAMBERS/LIGHTS 677.40 CARTRIDGES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 45981 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -MOP/MOP HEAQ/BATTERIES/PAINT BRUSH/SPRAY 408.80 -PAINT/SEALANT/TAPE/SAW/WASHERS/NUTS/ VALVES/CLOCK/SHOVEL HANDLE-FIRE DEPT 45982 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN -TRIMMER-SEWER DEPT/CHAINS SHARPENED-FIRE 231.52 DEPT/PLATE-COMMUNITY CENTER 45983 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING-COMMUNITY PROFILE-PLANNING DEPT 706.45 45984 R S R SPECIALTIES INC -ZAMBONI BLADES SHARPENED/ZAMBONI REPAIR- 163.80 ICE ARENA-COMMUNITY CENTER !85 RAINBOW TREECARE SERVICE-FORESTRY DEPT 507.00 45986 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS OF MN -MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/CASH REGISTER TAPE- 1162.20 .LIQUOR STORE 45987 RIVIERA FINANCIAL SERVICES SMALL TOOLS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 355.69 45988 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CO SWITCH-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 157.99 45989 RDAD RESCUE INC DISPOSABLE GLOVES-FIRE DEPT 65.98 45990 ROGERS WELL DRILLING PUMP REPAIR-PARK MAINTENANCE 70.00 45991 ROLLINS OIL CO GAS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 7611.72 45992 KEVIN D ROSS GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 222.00 45993 ST PAUL BDOK & STATIONERY CO OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 4.00 45994 THE SANDWICH FACTORY INC EXPENSES-HUMAN SERVICES/POLICE DEPT 57.19 45995 SAVOIE SUPPLY CO INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-PARK MAINTENANCE 131.88 45996 KENNETH L SCHINDLER GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 459.00 45997 SEDGEWICK HEATING REFUND-MECHANICAL PERMIT 93.26 45998 JOEL SHIELDS TIMBERS-EDEN LAKE PARK/HOMEWARD HILLS PARK 3403.00 45999 MICHAEL SKARP EXPENSES-AOUATIC SUPERVISOR 24.00 46000 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP SMALL TOOLS-EOUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 133.74 46001 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC ALBUM-COMMUNITY CENTER 6.49 46002 JODI SORRELL TENNIS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 225.00 46003 SOUTHDALE BRANCH YMCA -SERVICE-3RD QUARTER 88 YMCA YOUTH 2625.00 OUTREACH PROGRAM 46004 SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COU 2ND QUARTER 88 SERVICE 3000.00 46005 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSI SERVICE-4TH QUARTER 88-CABLE TV 5130.00 46006 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC -LEGAL ADS-PLANNING DEPT/ADVERTISING- 2131.94 LIQUOR STORES !7 SPECIALTY SCREENING PLAQUE-FIRE DEPT 50.94 46008 STEVE STENSGAARD AWARDS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 110.00 46009 STRETCHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE ED UNIFORMS/GUN REPAIR-POLICE DEPT 412.70 3533502 2 2q F OCTOBER 4,1988 "17010 NATALIE SWAGGERT SEPTEMBER B8 EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES 200.00 1 011 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET -TANK ASSEMBLY/VALVE/BRACKET/CONTROL 199.74 ASSEMBLY-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/SEWER DEPT 46012 TARGET 220 SUPPLIES-4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION/DAY CAMP 23.95 46013 THOMPSON PLUMBING REFUND-PLUMBING PERMIT 76.50 46014 VALARIE TRADER AQUA AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 150.00 46015 TRESTMAN MUSIC CENTER SHEET MUSIC-EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY BAWD 203.60 46016 W TULL CO INC GRASS SEEDERS-PARK MAINTENANCE 148.71 46017 TURF SUPPLY CO GRASS SEED-PARK MAINTENANCE 2678.00 46018 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO ACETYLENE/DXYGEN-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 65.18 46019 TWIN CITIES SPORTS T SHIRTS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 344.50 46020 ERNIE ULKU AWARDS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 90.00 46021 UNIFDRMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-FIRE DEPT B4.00 46022 UNITED LABORATORIES INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-STREET MAINTENANCE 125.35 46023 USA TOOAY ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES 34.00 46024 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 453.11 46025 JEREMY UZZELL FOOTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 180.00 46026 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE INC GAS CYLINDERS-COMMUNITY CENTER 190.10 46027 VESSCO INC -2 CHEMICAL FEEDERS/CHOLORINE CYLINDER 1270.25 CONNECTIONS-WATER DEPT 46028 VICOM INC -AUGUST 88 TELEPHONE WIRE MAINTENANCE- 81.85 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING .29 VIDEOTRONIX INC BADGE HOLDERS-POLICE DEPT 22.23 46030 VIKING PAINTS INC PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE 60.00 46031 VIKING PRESS INC -PRINTING-FALL BROCHURE-PARKS RECREATION 5237.70 & NATURAL RESOURCES '32 CLAYTON G VNUK SMALL TOOLS-WATER DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINT 852.50 )33 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP CO LIGHT BULBS/CDNTACT KIT-SEW:H DEPT 252.10 46034 KEITH WALL SEPTEMBER BB EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 20B.00 46035 MILTON WALLACE CORP REFUND-WATER METER DEPOSIT 26B.47 46035 WATER PRODUCTS CO -GENERATOR COVER/5/8-3/4 100 GAL REMOTES- 195.60 BUILDING DEPT 46037 WATSON FORSBERG CO SERVICE- FIRE STATIONS #3 & #4 51556.00 46038 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 134.86 46039 WILSON TANNER GRAPHICS -LETTERHEAD-CITY HALL/BUSINESS CARDS- 950.00 POLICE DEPT/BROCHURE-HISTORICAL SOCIETY 46040 X ERGON SANDING CLOTH-WATER DEPT 144.70 46041 XEROX CORP AUGUST 88 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL 94.00 46042 YDUNGSTEDTS INC WHEEL ALIGNMENT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 69.90 46043 EARL ZENT SCHOOL-ASSESSING DEPT 34.00 46044 ZIEBART OF MINNESOTA INC RUSTPROOFING-WATER DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINT 150.00 46045 FLOUR CITY WELDING & MFG CO HANGERS & HOOKS-FIRE DEPT 650.00 44792 VOID DUT CHECK 25.00- 44793 VOID DUT CHECK 22.61- 45393 VOID OUT CHECK 45540 VOID OUT CHECK 50.00 45624 VOID OUT CHECK 42009- 658953 1067.67 $653464.25 q. 2295G , h • DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS t GENERAL 254956.79 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT 268.64 15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M 25290.39 • 17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE 2616I.74 21 POLICE FORFEITURE 4686.28 22 STATE AID CONST 3543.20 31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP 23307.43 33 UTILITY BOND FUND 8290.27 39 86 FIRE STATION CONST 51556.00 45 UTILITY DEBT FD ARB 716.69 51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FO -1.57 73 WATER FUND 49550.77 77 SEWER FUND I99418.62 81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 5719.00 $653464.25 • 229A MEMQBABDUM TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: John Frane RE: An Overview of Laws and Rules Regarding Pull Tab Sales DATE: September 30, 1988 Expenses cannot exceed 45% of gross income after prizes. Examples of allowable expenses: Cost of pull tabs Compensation to person selling the tabs Rent which cannot exceed $24/square foot/month or $600/month Advertising The 10% tax paid to the Charitable Gambling Board A person must be designated as the gambling manager. A bartender may not sell pull tabs. It is unlawful to reveal the number of tabs sold or remaining to be sold and the number of winners left. The Gambling Board is empowered to make rules and issue regulations regarding the conduct of gambling and reporting. The maximum pull tab prize is $250 on any tab. Tabs may not be sold for more than $2. The City could add a tax of up to 3% to cover its costs of enforcing and monitoring its own rules. (We do not have any rules.) The City has 60 days in which to approve or disapprove a request for charitable gambling. 22AG Business Grammar September 25, 1988 Review br JoAnn Sv.rrson The Eden Prairie City Council Eden Prairie City Hall 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Eden Prairie City Council Members: We will be speaking on the following issue at the October 4 City Council meeting. We are sending this letter to acquaint you with the matter before the meeting. BACKGROUND The City of Eden Prairie made a deal with Lee Johnson to use a lot he owned as a dumping ground for the excess dirt which was excavated from the renovation/expansion of Old Franlo Road. This issue was addressed by JoAnn Syverson and Ray Hoveland (two homeowners with homes adjacent to the Lee Johnson lot) at a City Council meeting in August. The two homeowners were concerned that the use of this lot as a dumping ground would alter the drainage pattern of the land and cause problems with water on their lots. Also addressed was the fact that the lot (which was then a beautifully wooded piece of property) would become a treeless weed patch. The City Council, after hearing guarantees that the landfill would not affect drainage or, the neighboring properties and that grass would be planted on the lot, okayed the Lee Johnson project. The next day Marc Syverson met with Lee Johnson (owner of the lot), Jeff Johnson (City of Eden Prairie representative) and a foreman from the construction crew. All agreed: * A clump of mature trees would remain along Old Franlo Road. It was agreed there was no need to destroy these beautiful, large trees. * There was a good possibility five or six of the trees designated to be destroyed would be transplanted on the Syverson berm to offer them some screening from Old Franlo Road. * The grading of the Lee Johnson lot would be agreeable to all (this issue is yet to be resolved). • 22-9 i 1912 Joy Circle• Eden Prairie, MN 55344•612-941-1019 page 2 What happened: * A few days later, the Syversons were notified there would be no ,trees planted on their berm. They were told some of the trees ",'' --were box elder trees and besides it was not the right time of ' year to transplant trees. * On Tuesday, September 20, all the trees along Old Franlo Road behind the Syverson property were ripped out. This was admittedly a mistake caused by a lack of communication between the City of Eden Prairie representative ( Jeff Johnson) and the contrac- tor on the job. ISSUE The City of Eden Prairie/Lee Johnson "deal" has greatly benefited: * The City of Eden Prairie--they got an inexpensive way to get dispose of unwanted dirt. * Lee Johnson--this project had made what we believed to be "unbuildable" land now "buildable." * All the property owners along Old Franlo Road--their assessments were lower because the city had this inexpensive way to dispose of its dirt (told to us by Eden Prairie representatives). On the other hand, the Syverson property has most likely decreased N in value due to the change in the Lee Johnson property. Now they have no screening from Old Franlo Road, which will become a heavily travelled road after the renovation and after Lund's Food Store opens. Because of the "deal" made between the City of Eden Prairie and Lee Johnson, many people have greatly benefited. One Eden Prairie homeowner has greatly lost because of this deal. The Syversons have been directly hurt by this project and its broken promises. PROPOSAL In the name of fairness, the Syversons are asking that some screen- ing be given to them from Old Franlo Road. They ask that trees be planted either along the road frontage or on their berm. Considering the amount of money saved by this project for so many, they are asking for some help in recovering their property value. Because of a communication problem caused by the City, they have been greatly disadvantaged. They hope you will see their point of view. Submitted by �. .e ' arc and JoAnn yverson 2 ti Mt MURANUUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: City Manager Carl J. Jullie FROM: Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson SUBJECT: 1989 Budget DATE: September 29, 1988 Councilmembers made several requests for additional information during its review of the proposed 1989 budget. During the past few weeks, staff has been able to gather information to respond to these questions. Additionally, a few other items have come to light which should be addressed as revisions to the proposed budget. 1. Revenue (page 3) - $5,000 net will be added for 1989 park use fees as the $2,500 expense for park use was already included in the Community Center budget. 2. Administration (p. 7) - The amount of time for the clerical position is 0.5 for 1988, and 0.4 for 1989. 3. Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources (pp. 10 - 20) The Director of this Department has prepared a memorandum which addresses the issues raised by Council: *the Program Coordinator position (p. 13); *the Adaptive Recreation program cost assignment and use by Eden Prairie residents (p. 19); *reduction in expense in music and drama events (p. 20); and *information regarding the differences in equipment needed for a 15-foot rotary mower and a tractor with snow plow, blower (and broom), each having a cost of $45,000 (p. 11A). Bids received for re-tiling the pool deck at the Community Center were well in excess of the $20,000 in the 1988 budget. It is recommended that $42,000 be allocated in the 1989 budget for this improvement. The additional $22,000 revenue would be shown as a transfer from the General Fund balance. Staff will be exploring the possibility of providing turf maintenance under contract to the Eden Prairie School District. The City will gain full ownership of the house on Riley Lake in May 1990. 4. Finance (p. 21) - The proposed budget calls for a procurement officer. It is suggested that the title shown for this position be changed to "Purchasing/ Accountant" as the envisioned responsibilities would be in these two areas. A preliminary description of responsibilities and qualifications will be distributed Tuesday. Two revisions to the proposed budget for this department are recommended. First, $6,000 appears in the 198E budget for computer equipment. This purchase will not occur this 2--+q - 2 - year, but should happen next year. To accomplish this, $6,000 would be added to the General Fund Balance at year-end 1988, and would be shown as a $6,000 increase in the General Fund balance transfer for revenue in 1989. Second, more detailed planning for the office partition system shows that the estimate is low. This amount should be increased from $9,500 to $19,000. The additional revenue needed can come from an increase in the General Fund balance transfer in 1989. 5. Human Services (p. 23) - Councilmembers questioned the types and locations of services provided by human service agencies funded by the City. The Director for this program has answered these concerns in an attached memorandum. One revision is recommended here. The United Battered Family program ($1,500) was not recommended to be specifically funded by the Human Rights & Services Commission, but to be reviewed for funding from the Human Services Fund (for evolving needs). A $1,500 reduction is therefore recommended. 6. Planning (p. 24) - Specific information on computer hardware, software, and applications requested for 1989 is related in an attached memorandum. The primary advantage of the HP Vectra is its compatibility with more useful and readily available IBM-based software. 7. Police (p. 25) - A memorandum is attached explaining the new model used for determining staffing levels and on the status and future alternatives for dispatching services. 8. Equipment Maintenance (p. 31) - Council requested information on the history of fuel use and cost by the City during 1987 and 1988 as well as a projection for 1989. These figures show the volatility of recent fuel markets, and cost savings of 25 percent have not been unusual. 1987 1988* 1989** Regular 24,300 gal. 25,000 ga1.(92.60 0 Unleaded 60,100 68,000 (2.6(1) 98,000 Diesel 25,600 32,000 (2.4d) 34,000 $Spent 83,131 102,866 108,564 $Budgeted 135,000 115,000 110,000 230U - 3 - *Projections are based on using the first six months of 1987 to determine a percentage of fuel used during the entire year, and applying these percentages to the two six-month periods in 1988. **No regular gas will be purchased in 1989, a practice started some time into 1988. The amount of fuel estimated to be used in 1989 is five percent greater than 1988. 9. Fire Equipment Certificates (p. 41) - Councilmembers had two questions about quantities of two items to be purchased. *Pagers ($10,000) - A total of 20 pagers would be purchased. This line item would also include purchase of chargers and a 48-hour repair-or- replace warranty. *Flashlights ($2,800) - A total of 100 flashlights would be purchased. Flashlights used in fire- fighting must be able to withstand heavy-duty treatment. RECOMMENDATION: With revisions proposed, it is recommended that the Council adopt Resolution No. 88-230 to certify the 1989 tax levy and budget. CWD:jdp Attachments t ii , 301 MEMORANDUM TO: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources — DATE: September 26, 1988 SUBJECT: 1989 Budget Information I understand the City Council has requested information regarding several items within the proposed I989 budget for this department. Hopefully, this memorandum will satisfactorily answer the questions or concerns of the Council members. RECREATION COORDINATOR POSITION On page 13 of the 1989 City Budget, I have included a position "Program Coordinator" and recommended funding at a salary of $41,200. That is the same salary budgeted in 1988 for the Superintendent of Recreation position. As you krow, earlier this year the previous Superintendent of Recreation resigned. At that time, it was his recommendation that the position not be filled; however, he did recommend an assistant to the Director position. When Mr. Bolinske left the City, I met individually with each of the full-time staff members that had been under his jurisdiction to determine their recommendation for filling the position. All of the staff agreed that, due to proximity of their work station (the Community Center and the Senior Center), they have very little contact with the Director and question whether or not I, as the Director, would have sufficient time to provide them with the direction, support, feedback and supervision they feel is necessary to provide the most effective service to the public. Each of the staff members had different opinions on whether or not it was necessary to fill the position. All agreed that if I, as the Director, were able to spend additional time a the Community Center to provide direction, responsibilities covered by the previous Superintendent of Recreation could be assumed by existing staff if we were to increase one of the 30 hour per week part-time staff members to a 40 hour per week position. Each of the Recreation Staff members had different opinions on the most important function of the Recreation Coordinator position, i.e. overall staff coordination and leadership, public relations and promotions, providing communication between the Recreation Staff and the Director, initiating new programs and special events, supervising large community events, such as the 4th of July, or simply being available to other staff when necessary. Over the last 4 or 5 years all of the full-time staff of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Division that are based outside of City Hall have indicated a growing concern for the lack of contact between them and the Director. As you know, I completed a two week time study to determine exactly what percentage of time I spend in contact with staff outside City Hall. Approximately two years ago that amounted to less than 5% of my time. I recommended initiating the Superintendent of Recreation position because of that deficiency hoping that individual would provide the direction and 2 2UZ support that I have not had time to provide. Unfortunately, there seemed to be less communication between the Director and the recreation staff with that position in place. At this time, I have initiated a special weekly meeting with the Recreation Division that requires me to meet at the Community Center with the recreation staff on a regular basis. That seems to have resolved a number of the concerns of the recreation staff to date; however, there are still some concerns regarding some of the other responsibilities of that position that have not been assigned as yet. I have indicated to the recreation staff that I would request the position be funded, but would not make a recommendation on that individual's job description until I feel convinced that a full-time position is warranted and determine what type of staffing position would best meet the needs of this department. I recognize that 60% of my job evaluation is based on how well I manage the staff of this department; yet, I spend less than 5% of my time attending to that task. Approximately 95% of my time relates to completing the reports and projects initiated by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission, the City Council and the public; the majority of which relate to park acquisition, park maintenance and department policy. As I have indicated to you, I would not initiate any change in staffing without first providing you with a detailed report on the reason for any change from the existing situation. I do believe there will be a requirement for some change just to handle the program responsibilities; however, I have not yet decided just what is the most effective and efficient course of action for improving the management of this department. ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM The Council had several questions relating to the Adaptive Recreation program. The first question related to the overall cost for the four cities. The cities of Richfield and Bloomington have shared the cost of a large adaptive recreation program for many years. The City of Richfield has one full-time program person as well as the full-time manager for the Bloomington- Richfield program and budgets $65,000 for this program. The City of Bloomington has 1 full-time and one 7/8 part-time position and budgeted $90,000 in I988 for this program. The City of Eden Prairie and the City of Edina are splitting the cost of one full-time program person. Edina and Eden Prairie each have the same amount budgeted for the full-time person and the costs relate to programs provided by that person, as well as administrative costs the City of Richfield caused by the program person. Edina and Eden Prairie both budgeted $29,400 for the 1988 program. Both cities project the same budget of $33,500 for 1989. The full-time program person was not hired until April 1988; therefore, the summer program is the only completed quarter. Forty-two Eden Prairie residents were served by this program. Staff believes it is too early to project how many would be served during the twelve months of 1989. Many of the individuals with learning disabilities are integrated into the "normal" recreation programs and, in fact, the goal of the Adaptive Recreation program is to integrate as many individuals in the regular recreation programs as possible. 2 303 HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL COMMISSION The City Council questioned the reason for decreasing the music and drama budget from $5,400 budgeted in 1988 to $4,200 proposed for 1989. The reason for the decrease is caused by the elimination of the Community Theatre group for which the City had previously budgeted $2,000. The Community Theatre group disbanded in late 1987. City staff have met with several of the individuals that have been involved with the Community Theatre group, encouraging the continuation of their program and offering City support. No one was interested in taking a leadership role in continuing the Community Theatre group; therefore, the amount was dropped from the 1989 budget. Staff have increased the amount budgeted for the summer "Concerts-in-the Park" program, anticipating the construction of the Staring Lake Amphitheater. PARK MAINTENANCE CAPITAL OUTLAY The Council requested additional information regarding the $45,000 mower and the $45,000 tractor and snow blower. Attached is a copy of a mower similar to the $45,000 mower quoted by Toro Manufacturing Company. This is basically a single purpose piece of machinery; however, the mower can be installed with a cab and broom for additional funds and can be used for sweeping snow from hockey rinks. Staff would not recommend using this expensive piece of equipment during the winter months in order to reduce the wear and tear and rust, and to extend the use period on this machine. The Superintendent of Parks contacted the Hennepin County Park Reserve District, the City of Minneapolis and the City of Bloomington to determine what their recommendation was for the best piece of equipment to remove snow from a 5' wide sidewalk. Personnel at each organization recommended the Holder Tractor equipped with a blower and V-plow. They all indicated that this piece of equipment had the least amount of breakdown and provided the best job for removing snow most efficiently from sidewalks. Attached is some additional information on the Holder Tractor and blower. This four wheel drive articulated tractor can be used for other jobs such as mowing in rough areas such as nature trails, aerating ballfields, spraying for weed control, etc., as it does have a three point hitch compatible with our other equipment. The front motor rotary mower would need to be purchased as an additional piece of equipment. The 5' wide snow blower and 5' wide V-plow is included in the $45,000 estimated cost for this piece of equipment. Staff would expect to initially maintain approximately 5 miles of sidewalk with this equipment, and would also use the equipment for assisting the larger tractor with removing snow from nearly 50 miles of 8' wide asphalt walkways. The City has nearly 20 miles of sidewalk at this time; however, staff would not recommend beginning to remove snow from every sidewalk as the manpower costs would be prohibitive. BL:mdd 11,.: , st /; HR The Rugged, High-Capacity Mower y i ,1 - (5 : ___ j {�{ t— a r r .� !ti E �ml .� t � 1 I "' I- -4tvr Professional Turf Equipment °~.~"^` , .. , .' ' ^ ' ' ' ^ ` ~`°.°^` 41 OBS E NTEMON ' Ki &1 1 , In 1 ,,e eaf k .q r u" and ,• r•�� y .. '•t k•'t, , )J 1 • i4 ,*p i'r as - C 3 0. snowplow ' ww ,,o-- 't'^1 ..;.may an ` �r1 L', t.4.,- r,, t, h tih h,10 r.p tr. a •`1.s - •t Y ., •7 F:�Hotofia ..... , '�� There are several t _s 1 r ment � r]�� •. � , '1111..l. �- ^tdii� wr crossed 5 s ns e reads at Or l �'_: CI1 hf.0 stone `pr C%,3T) tfG .S w �-1— " �� - v - hycra.dic drive rear body o';unreel • l 1i." ie _ill■ , sander w Ih 2 flow con,rO fl es for w`f it,' • ;:. <•V k Spread w(dth and volume Operated �y �� Iron tI tcno N t.t. 4 • ,` . 7 �;, Hopp,. r.apncrty.700 L!`,.euu yr:! -1-'^" •��- �'.' -- • There are snowblowers to re+r5('j,,.rc-=-a'- ,. r., with d working w Cth of 1 SO kir,J •_ - 150 C n(50 and 601 r1) Hydra left �„ _. �'o<.:u �* -�`� and npht swivel ng chute,.s th hood , �hi, .` n S` a defier,for Optional truck o,;t.nq chute •-.I '��� �:� _ - J Wi!h hyo-aU4l-t J 7d OCtle�`Ur _- K ^'mil krf r P t". deF low,heat. duty constr I n quic4 -..ice •: ,� f 2-0 ✓y df•IaC 1"If',o dCe'lU f'Cl vt'�1g Jq('' __ • Y '}1 Y:J:r • yYfl ,i� ,' .r. 4 I -•mflr.. 24 +a ,> „'.4 , Rear 3•polnt hopper PTO d en w th mechameal spread neyohtx � `1� / widh adz stme 1 E acts e u(Ilcw .! ,.' 'F1\,.. [./ ll N � ' CO-tt of w I mes.nanical sI d .,1 ve :I. f l 1•' I l 5y�.'04,. � '.. , ' ie,, Opt ai w'h remo.e Control r '� -: A v�' 1 . d•.,'or r,Q _ II°, i,cab {�1 �� I , ,, a• • gpr a 1 w•it11 0 8 8 m 17 5-6 ftl r r'• �7 ev'♦ ? ��`tj Can also heuse0isfort Ze p'e-aaer plin .'.. 1 � t .1' , , ` f. .1' ti ^` i• 1i.` "' ` '' t ' ' r �! y • R' 'li 5 r.•'•.:_;-; I.,- .--; ...? ‘'‘..•'•.'", '''`.1t•;',7,t*'!.. '-....";'(•,‘- -.:---r''..•;•,..- .. . . ,, ,..$.. ... . • . • 1 . ... • . -4.• — ., , ,..................-4.-.•-"4 t.....S"'"•"`-"•”"*"` r''Or. il" •• I,A! !• g ' • C I• - I • ,att . ... . . f-t• °:' „. '.:•,./."." .'.;4Att.‘"4•c`•"1"''''s--.- ' ''''1.:?.'"!•.'f";f.--,-,, , vi..,....... - ....,- 0.. 41o. '''';';'"-v-1:44''V:7. 1. ' ._ ".' . ( ,,i ,. ( '''',• ,^' .*4:54. ,,,,,,,.4,-,,VN.,...t"t.,, -: lAtz • 1,. .6 ' ;'.%,' '' , V._ •..," .4''''...*--ri';'4,4, ------4.--t.c: . . . f.,,,,,...:..:..--.—:.-s.- • . -- --. ..._._- —• .... .•,--,„_..-7.,..,....• ......... ... , _ ,..--. , ........„--„,:,,,...,::-.,,,,,,,,:-.. -,...0._--r.c.,,,,,,,ic,.,,........s,....e.‘,..----,•'. • , ..:4.,-.,=•-•-•,,----- - • . ---- • — .,,:r..,4 .t,...,:.....„.7,11.,....,...:.: .-.1..,i,...;:r•. •".7.C''..- .t?' Nk'rr..!.-„,, .::- •• ,,i•." ... .'' ,,(411:1......'47;... .,....- --1'.04.6..V...4.e,,;-44Kkr ../4... 4}/..,;... - ' '.'".."'...'''' . cr.q..qie.,:•,[.Y;.-.4*,4,,,:,......-..•. •• - -• -;-.• k1.4,,.N.r..,4::.,.-,%-.4z*:;:.11 .,-.,,,,,.., ....4,-,s, cx.,..L7, .x„,",,,s6.:%,,4,4'..:-wrIzi.ri-N-4:....._-...-.4%.7.,-.--..-.., .. ..--n,:.-,724,7.-t•-..,,,._. ,...:.-,p..-...-4..---:-,ty-„tit,t',,,..;4-. TT,- '1114.1.7,SX,„,ler0.0Tyr:T_Az,.,•-.45:1•,.,4;!,74.;,'T:.'".''-,r,,.•••T.T. "-.--..'"te!‘-.-- **.-gri:,:r.' .,..:yi,;.1::"...XT; Te....".4.,,f1....+41.1)037.rst__._..44,4',,I•szp.4.,,:wA,k4...vmiczi7,....,.4Piliria . ,,,,,,..11;:.:,;.....,„.;-,.. ,,.7,.,...,*....„..,1;.-.-.......'..-,t34...zt',...'-$6,-;irk.5ii,24:i,....g•PFT7', 4,,,,33',,,:f•-- ;'.....-1...f."tAlet.,.,;,,,,VA . is.i.;:trica.,,,,k#4,..4cAZ, '',.. Alt,:',,,',...17. ,'"?•- ,ii.o. .....:,„,i.i,:‘,.;‘,...7.;.... „,v,,t..v...-r.-!-,F.,,,,r-,!"?...4.•:)..Z..."..,•••:.••-•-*A.,- - , .-. ..1. •• •-•• • . ..1; . • ''"' .:1•:1/4141k... ":.*P-C... '71 *"0.,..c.-' •-• 14. .."1., , '" :' .7 ".•r ."*Ir•-:,.!' Sportslield,Ballpark,T-innIsaourt II ' • ,4 1...4 -'••,,A •-7.,.72:ge . Playground Maintenance -- , "t,..-':...: ,04,':'::' - .' ..4,04t4:ohirt.—" " - ' wIn,d crocl.c.e(.,)"'," " '.• -•''' ;.....i.... . .1-,...;..4„... ., z,.......: ...4.§...:, , ••••,.,c4 .J.,11C „ea: . ,. , ,.IT up,r.i:ur, loo..,et• .'':•::.....t'•:4 '..,.•:`,.".40ill, ..'..; -:1,... .141- ttor•• ' ,....0,er.v•••• - • • , O ! . . e. wl[It'l 1,..)J t, • .„,-01074-0 .,....... .11 .„.......... • • 0' , ',Lir'ICe.r11.xtr,: PI? , . '.lit.,, ( . Front-mounted Rotary Mower ...-i7="... ... ..1....,/,-... .w, .. ,or. \• i la1M, ,0 "c At • llrFryl ... •:-;,:„ , '..ai:."..•',.;:,,,,,,,,$•••.t.."/L.v.,7:-.:',7%., --2:•••,x.• -,-4. Holder Sprayer Attachment.......l, -- ---. . I : . 41:3/' . . • - I1:::ir'1:1, /*Vt. ,:-?..•...„...,I; •.;71i,:',.' ,. ,41,1.'4'. ••.....„,- `'",•:4 , dd.:rd.(.1.,fur 1,iv,,,drd,..;,,!,'Ir.Irr,, /"..,r)- 'kw ..1444.7.1 it,r,..,„.•.t:/;.• •L, ...4.."„„:+),i1.'''''-..-...- ,,,, •.Ic TT.0.0k u.,Ir.,I r• ,re. . I _ , 7 . r I), ay. ''' ,..:.1' ' '* •• . ' '' 1 '" •Til e OP-•*" . 4,17 , * ,.„,./ -* ' '-',-..-A-cii1A.. . ---- .:......: ,,,,... ,• `-;:".: 'f/7- ir\-.1.01-:''':'i,a1 .:',•:041'.it •,... -'' .:,- '''' 4,41 Ir."' 't-1 N' t,4s•"-1-..`f- ,'•,':.'r -7.', `".;,•• " ' 4:* '''',...,, 40 70 I ........-- -11:".• i1- .•Otk, •I'it'' 1 ., , ,,.. .. . Standard Three-poInt Aerator lo't' ''r,::.:4,, •::).I ''' : 'It '' ceo . ie.,:.,••• t- L.-, lgoiy •:4•-. *cil .,A uid,ur uu,',,),,1 t".r•;,ur... ,., ,eezk...ieiTi Y•11'. 1.,.5.107.1':_.111.:..."7-4 "...-.....-,..a.,T7Lt......_:;: it....___--. _.,....rWA1.1 9(3','tl.",'::',:2'1';'), . .....".=.... ., ... . " , 1 f'.....,7.• ‘' '..\\ V • t'.1 ' ...r,..;;;„,..,,;,,,,,:t.'„,.c.,..• :,„•::;TT.;p.:1. ., , .117/ToTTL ."/ 4 P.'• 0/4 T 1 '.* ".I tic'74;p7r•IV , IIr'V•'''''Se ' . ,_.. ....,.' , ,., '''!..0.4".., ‘ ,,,.„1/43", ..... :.: Villiq),•.i...kei..',4 Vi.,'W. '...'. ••4141s•fe,, .1X,•• " • ' ,, 1..-,),,,'.i I;',I 4•'.;1•L'.71:4%.ti,. ' . ,,, , A ,17-ir....1,,, krity,Z.4;,,„!,0 i'v,t•Tlfes''''.3.V,!i;.*.41,1% l', iT.,>•'• :, ., '' S\I,- ...il'is,'eltrq' . .7' r•;,'''.11i. ar$Viti, V• .. `,-1,, .. ,• , ..... 9 4',4,4pi.4://"? i.-'.4c-i...11:4; ,,'4, ,•,...,, t; ii;,`>:..24,1f.t:=4;Akickt';',Iii.);,4:01,fes-,__ ',-q.'*••• 4 ittivkii,p• ____ t TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CARL J. JULLIE CITY MANAGER M / THROUGH: NATALIE J. StIAGGERT I\�G DIRECTOR HUMAN RESOURCES SERVICES DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 1988 SUBJECT: 1989 BUDGET The 1989 budget recommendation indicates an increase in spending for social service agencies. This increase is a reflection of the continuing growth of Eden Prairie, as well as the trend at the State and County levels to decentralize services. As a result, at the local level, cities like Eden Prairie, must now participate with more financial support and planning to ensure that the necessary services are available to their residents. The Human Rights and Services Commission reviews all funding requests to determine which can best meet the needs of Eden Prairie residents. This year's recommended budget for social service agencies is $47,120 or $1.35 per capita. (Based on 34,900 population). Additional information supporting the Human Services budget including a brief analysis of the agencies and the services they provide is attached: 1989 HUMAN SERVICES BUDGET: SUPPORT INFORMATION Location of Service Providers Most of the service providers provide services to all four South Hennepin cities on an outreach basis. The location of their office for that reason can reside in any of the four communities. When an office in Eden Prairie is required to be effective, the provider is located here. SERVICE PROVIDER LOCATION SERVICE Cornerstone Bloomington 24 hr. Crisis line, Crisis support. Advocacy, shelter & counseling for victims of domestic abuse. Self- Referral, police referral, hospital referral. Storefront Edina *Youth chemical Dependency Program. *Fami ly Counseling. *Property Offender Program, School Referral, Police Referral. YMCA Outreach Eden Prairie Preventative programs for youth at risk. *Youth Support Groups. *Peer Counseling Groups. Outreach, School Counselor referral effort, self referral, peer referral South Hennepin Bloomington *Planning and service coordination for Human Services four cities, some direct programs. *Charaka *Home *Energy Assistance Senior Outreach Hopkins *In-home service to help Seniors learn about & locate needed services-to help them remain in their own homes. Case management follow-up provided. Self referral, family referral, social worker referral. UNITED BATTERED FAMILY is an agency that provides services to victims of domestic abuse. Unique to this organization is their use of a safehome shelter network. The Commission does not recommend a specific level of funding for this organization at this time. Any funding that would be granted would come from the evolving needs fund. The $1500 which appeared in the budget was in error and should be eliminated. A corrected budget page is attached. HUMAN SERVICE DIRECTORY- A study of the results of the community surveys done in 1987 revealed that the Human Services role most clearly felt to be the City's was that of information and referral. The Directory is intended to be a 'self-help' resource for locating services in our general area. The Directory is not intended to replace or compete with United Way's First Call For Help. It is a complimentary tool, intended for use in non-emergency situations. We will continue to assess the value and effectiveness of the Directory and work at obtaining additional financial support from the school district and/or private sector. (REVISED) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ( '989 BUDGET Program: Human Services 1989 DEPT. MGR. APPROVED BUDGET REQUEST REC'MD COUNCIL PERSONAL SERVICES Director .4 9,200 19,243 Coordinator .2 9,1D0 5,066 Secretary .3 9,700 5,594 Intern -0- 3,600 Overtime -0- 645 SUB 28,000 34,148 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Cornerstone 8,000 8,000 1krited-Bettered-Family -0- 2,500 Store Front -0- 10,000 YMCA Outreach 10,500 10,500 So. Hennepin Human Svcs. 12,000 11,400 $47,120 Senior Outreach -0- 1,220 Human Services Fund 5,000 6,000 (Evolving Needs) Consulting Services 2,500 2,000 Printing (R)6,000 8,500 (Human Svcs. Directory) SUB 44,000 - Ti6 COMMODITIES 57,620 Commission Expenses 300 500 Coordinating Council Expenses -0- 1,00D SUB 300 1,500 PROGRAM TOTAL $72,300 -94,-788- 93,268 • budget ,_,D7 3// f'V MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: September 28, 1988 RE: 1989 Budget In March of 1986, Hewlett Packard officially announced that the HP 150 would no longer be in production. Although continued support by the manufacturer is expected, the availability of new and improved hardware/software is extremely limited and will become more so in the future. Because of this and the City's desire to switch to the industry standard (IBM compatability), Staff has presented a budget proposal which accomplishes this purpose while also providing unlimited flexibility for expansion. A comparison of our existing equipment versus the new equipment is as follows: Computer: HP 150 C HP Vectra ES/12 Model 40 8 MHz 6086 Processor 12 MHz 30266 Processor 20 Megabyte Hard Disc Drive 40 Megabyte Hard Disc Drive 640 Kbytes R.A.M. 640 Kbytes R.A.M. 710 Kbytes Flexible Disc Drive 1.2 MB Flexible Disc Drive Printer: Epson FX 266 HP Laserjet II Method: Impact dot matrix Speed: 200 characters per second Dry type eeminuteotography Resolution: 240 x 72 dpi 8 pages per mnute Buffer: 8K 300 x 300 dpi Fonts: Pica 395K Elite 38 Styles Available The primary advantage to upgrading our computer system to the HP Vectra ES/12 is IBM compatibility. This allows the City maximum flexibility for future upgrading of the system and hardware/software support and availability. Other advantages include an increased data processing speed of approximately 33% and twice the memory capacity. The advantages associated with upgrading printers from the Epson FX 286 to the HP Laserjet II include an incre d printing speed of approximately 7 times and high resolution text and graphics ,see attached). These items are important considering the amount and type of work utilizing these functions including database management, spreadsheet analysis, and graphics. A brief description of current Planning Department applications follows. Z��2 Database Management The Planning Department began a database project in the summer of 1987 using RBASE ( 5000 software. The goal of the database is to have a computerized inventory of all land parcels in the city and information specific to each parcel. There are 19 different information tables in the database: Site identification, Administration- /Meeting dates, Planned Unit Developments, Developer's Agreements, Zoning/Land Use, Building Information, Variances, Zoning Violations, Wall Signs, Ground Signs, Utilities, Natural Features, Holds, Site Improvements, Covenants and Restrictions, Park Dedication, Residential Projects, Landscaping/Mechanical Screening, and Developer Agreement Conditions for Residential Projects. To have this information in a database provides tremendous "information management" capabilities such as quick and comprehensive data retrieval and data sorting by many different paths (i.e., PID #, zoning, guiding, approval date, etc.). Some current uses of the database include: A list of all non-residential parcels with PID#, address, project name and building name. A list of all non-residential, vacant land with its Guide Plan designation, zoning, and acreage. A list of all parcels in the Major Center Area, vacant and non- vacant, with guiding, zoning, and acreage. A list of residential projects with the required conditions from the developer's agreement, and if those conditions have been met. This information must be known before a building permit is issued. A list of projects with landscaping and mechanical screening requirements, if the requirements have been met, and the bond expiration date. All variances (1969-1988) have been entered and Staff can provide a list of all variance requests and actions taken, by type of variance, for the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. The Zoning Administrators often search for past zoning violations, variances, or sign permits by type and/or by PID #. Previously, it would have taken Staff hours to search through files for such information and without the assurance of having a comprehensive list; the database can pull up such information in minutes. At present, with approximately 6 of the 19 information tables complete, the database uses 3,000,000 bytes of memory space (96,500 for the operating system and 2,900,000 bytes for the data). As the database continues to expand, additional memory will be required. Spreadsheet Analysis The spreadsheet currently used by the Planning Department is Lotus 1-2-3. 1-2-3 is an advanced, all-in-one software program that combines the most important functions -- spreadsheet analysis, information management, and graphics into one flexible, fast, and easy-to-use program. The spreadsheet features more than 5D functions for Juilding complex models with speed and ease, including a full range of mathematical, logical, financial, statistical, and database statistical functions. Information 2?�J management features let you retrieve data using a wide range of criteria, and rapidly enter, query, and sort data. Graphics of up to six variables can be quickly constructed from the spreadsheet or database. 1-2-3's rapid graphics capability permits the use of graphs as an almost instantaneous analytical tool in combination with a spreadsheet and database. Important Planning Department applications include: 1) OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL LAND USE ACREAGE FILE - 1988 This file contains a spreadsheet of Office, Industrial, and Commercial land use acreage by City Sector; both land ZONED AND BUILT and not available for development, and land ZONED AND NOT BUILT and available for development. 2) OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL SQUARE FEET - 1988 The data contained in this report is an annual summary of all office, industrial, and commercial development in the City by parcel identification number (PID), address, and land use. Information was first collected for these annual summaries from the Building Department records and has now been verified with records from the Assessing Department. The purpose of this annual report is to maintain an inventory of office, industrial, and commercial development in the City. 3) RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE FILE - 1988 This file contains Residential land use acreage by City Sector; both land ZONED AND BUILT and not available for development, and land ZONED AMD NOT BUILT and available for development. The information in this file is used in various capacities, and is the source for data found in the Residential/Office/Industrial/Commercial Land Use Inventory Chart in the Eden Prairie Community Profile. 4) EDEN PRAIRIE HOUSING UNIT INVENTORY FILE - 1988 The information in this file is used primarily for demographic research purposes including annual population estimates, housing unit estimates, and population trending. The housing inventory file is also the source of information used in the housing, population, and land use sections of the Eden Prairie Community Profile. Graphics The graphics program currently used by the Planning Department is Charting Gallery. • Charting Gallery is a graphics application that helps create professional quality line, bar, and pie charts for reports and presentations. Charting Gallery can be used in conjunction with other Hewlett Packard business applications which add drawing features to a chart, create-memos, or process electronic mail. In addition, Charting Gallery can be used to make presentation quality graphics from Lotus 1-2-3 and VisiCalc spreadsheet data, or from the dBase II database program. 23IL Graphs created using Charting Gallery are primarily included within the Eden Prairie Community Profile and include: 1) Number of Housing Units 2) Housing Units Approved 3) Residential Building Permits 4) Population By Year 5) Population Growth 6) Employment Estimates Graphics are also used for special studies/reports when appropriate. In summary, the primary reason for upgrading the current computer system to the HP Vectra ES/12. Model .40 is IBM compatability. This allows the City maximum flexibility for future upgrading the system and hardware/software support and availability. Other additional memorycapacity�for database applications. The advantagesprocessin ofpethe sedaHnd P Laserjet II include high resolution text and graphics for report preparat;on and presentation purposes. ��I j ate m lio p I .........i.... �ecFa L. ,„ ___ el _ z c to m co AL i O. c. m W fa vi 1 ea m caH ■ t`l, 3 a c mdc � e aa) c 0 -c nom O .c iea nc O e m V m a N g Z 3 iiiiinin a Co 3 Fc m o .c th c m N 231V 9/21/88 TO: CRAIG DAWSON FROM: JIM CLARK SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR BUDGET STAFFING MODEL The 1989 budget preparation utilized a new method of determining staffing requirements, which is a change from previous years. In the past the staffing was determined by using the 1.1 police officers per 1000 population. This system is not necessarily reflective of the demands on the Police Department. This does not take into consideration such factors as day time population, commercial districts, and other demographics. The most comprehensive method of determining staffing which indirectly includes some of these factors is utilization of calls for service (CFS). This most closely demonstrates the demands on a Police Department and is retrievable data. The ICMA staffing model was selected after review of several other models. This model was the only one that worked well with the type of data that we had on file in our Department. Other models were more appropriate for larger departments or agencies with a wider variety of services, i.e. long term jail ect. The ICMA model (copy from ICMA manual attached) is designed to determine the number of officers required in the uniformed division, typically the largest of divisions within a police department. Utilizing that formula and applying qualifying calls for ser- vice hours (CFS/hrs) estimated for 1988, the total CFS/hrs would be 45,054. This number divided by the current esti- mated population (34,100) would show 1.32 CFS/hrs per capita. The 1.32 figure multiplied by the estimated 1989 total popu- lation of 40,000 equals 50,800 total CFS/hrs. In order to complete the formula then, the average hours of availability per officer must be computed. That number in our case is 1817 hours. The total 1989 estimated CFS/hrs, 52,800, divided by 1817 equals 29.05 or 29 officers. We currently have 27 in our uniformed division responding to calls for service and this number includes 4 patrol sergeants. These sergeants are assigned nearly a full call load along with their team members. This is not common practice among departments of comparable size. Their patrol 2Ji' 1 supervisors answer calls on a backup basis only and spend the remainder of the time moving from zone to zone in a strict supervisory capacity. Over 40% of our present patrol staff have less than two years of total experience. Therefore, it is important that they have access to supervisors on a regular basis. Achieving this goal in one year would require the addition of four regular patrol officers to the number required to meet normal increases in CFS. This year that would increase our personnel request to six. Instead, we propose to add one extra officer to our request this year as a more graduated attempt at removing sergeants from general patrol duties. Using this approach each budget year through 1992, would help us achieve that objective. RICHFIELD DISPATCH The 1989 budget reflects a cost for dispatching services that is the same as 1987 and 1988. This is not reflective of the cost sharing formula as outlined in the 1982 agreement with Richfield. Costs were to be determined by using a formula of population and property valuation. At the time the 1988 budget was being prepared the supervisor of the communications division, at Richfield, was not able to provide us with a projected cost for the upcoming year and committed to the 1987 figure. As we were preparing the 1989 budget we again asked for a cost of services for the upcoming year. At that time Richfield was just coming through a change in leadership within the Police Department. The new Department head, Jack Erskine, met with us and discussed the possibility of proposing a new system of determining costs that would more accurately reflect the actual dollars spent on dispatching. Mr. Erskine and his staff felt that this new system would be acceptable to us, however they did not have time to complete the project and make a formal presentation to us. Again, they made a commitment to the 1987 figure for 1989. It is anticipated that in the near future Richfield will make a formal presentation to the City concerning cost sharing. We continue to research alternatives to Richfield that will be both cost effective and directed toward improved services. There are critical issues to be addressed as they relate to our department becoming independent. The most serious of which is the lack of radio frequencies for police emergency communications. The Minnetonka Police Department received one of the last available frequencies. Recently we attended a presentation sponsored by the Hennepin County Sheriff that outlined the future of emergency communications. It is obvious that the entire Hennepin ( County system is in need of massive repairs and we are not the only City with deep interest in this issue. There are some very exciting developments in this area and we will continue to research the issue. As a part of the architectural review (for future addition) it is our intent to include dispatching design proposals in this 1989 study. It is our belief that any future expansion, to the building, should include a dispatching area. 4 When determining the optimum size of the patrol force,consideration must be given to the duties the patrol force is expected to perform. Basically,these • duties can be described as follows:(II responding to calls for service;(2)con- ducting preventive patrol; and (3) performing miscellaneous administrative tasks. • Of these three broad classifications,the first and the third can usually be mea- tsured reliably through the use of radio logs,dispatch cards,or patrol activity • logs of some type.Through these logs,for example,it is usually possible to de- . terrnine on an annual basis what portion of an officer's time is devoted to re- sponding to calls for service and performing administrative duties.The balance of an officer's time can then be said to be devoted to preventive patrol. • The amount of time that should be devoted to each of these three broad areas • is largely a policy decision that should be made locally,based on past expert • - • ence.As a general rule,it has been stated that"uncommitted"patrol time • should ranee between 25 and 35 percent of the total time of the patrol force.The • remaining(,5 to 75 percent,then,can be apportioned between responding to • calls for service and performing administrative duties,such as servicing the pa- trol unit,transporting prisoners,and so forth. In determining how much time should be allocated to responding to calls for • service,it is necessary to consider the time needed to respond to the initial call,plus any additional time required for follow-up investigation,report prepa- ration,prisoner processing,and related duties.It should be noted,however, • that when determining patrol staffing requirements,only actual calls for service, • and not officer-initialed incidents,should be counted.The reason is that officer- initiate.incidents are a direct result of patrol staffing,while calls for service are independent of staffing levels. Once the total required patrol time has been determined,it is necessary to convert this to patrol positions on the basis of the average number of days or hours a patrol officer can be expected to work in a given year.This can be calcu- lated by reviewing a sample of personnel time sheets for a one-year period.For example,after accounting for time lost due to vacations,holidays,training,arid other absences,it may be found that the average patrol officer can be expected to work 1,890 hours during a twelve-month period.This figure can then be di- vided into the total number of patrol hours required to provide the necessary staffing level. Assume that a police agency determined on the basis of past experience that a patrol officer's time should hypothetically be allocated as follows: I. One-third responding to calls for service 2. One-third performing preventive patrol • 3. One-third performing administrative duties'. • llylictl,cl,cal mc,(leol levels and lin,r. Ave,age Total rcquucnle,a5 rime per required Number OI mc,Ceni lime Activity inoidenls (tows) thoursl • Invesbgat,ar of comes and arrests 6.350 15 12.525 Investigation 01 lane accidents 1.950 I 0 1,950 Miscellaneous services 6.330 05 3.165 Total 16630 I7.640 Assume luithcr that analysis of patrol activities fur a tvelvcauorth period had uxhcated incident levels as shown in the accompanying table. In order to provide adlition;d time for preventive patrol and handling admin- istiative dimes.the total required time 117.f40 hours)must be multiplied by 3, resulting in a total of 52,9211how.required to provide an adequate patrol staff- y mg level.1 his figure a then divided by die ntimlxer of hours a single officer can be expected ro woo k in a year(1,890)to produce the actual number of personnel that most be assigned to the patrol force:2%. It most he emphasized that the ligu es in this example are rum ely hypothetical `f :old are not intended to represent actual time estimates.Actual ligilies and time nlluc:diuns will vary firm one department to the next.The most irnponanl re- yuiruncm,lunvevet,is the ability to collect:urd analyze patio)activity data in • older that these calculations can be made. • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-230 A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING 1988 TAX LEVY, COLLECTABLE IN 1989 BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Eden Prairie, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the following sums of money be levied for the current year, collectable in 1989, upon the taxable property in said City of Eden Prairie for the following purposes: General Fund $ 7,820,000 Bonds and Interest 1977 Fire Bonds 70,000 1980 Park Bonds 430,000 Transportation System Bonds 400,000 1982 Building 425,000 1986 Fire Bonds 36,000 $ 9,181,000 Funds have been provided for principle and interest payments on all bond issues except as shown above and no other levies are required. The City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota. ADOPTED this 4th day of October, 1988. Gary Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk BUDTAX 1989 EUtN PRARIE BUDGET A4SFX[D VALUATIONS. TAX LEVIES AND MILL RATES (shown by year of tax collection) tACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET 1986 1987 19E8 1989 CONVERTED ASSESSED VALUATIONS REAL PROPERTY 354893262 424305359 60150157 71555043 PERSONAL PROPERTY 10108440 10764018 1417962 1417962 GROSS VALUE 365001702 435069377 61568119 72973005 FISCAL DISP CONTRIBUTION -50091923 -63788893 -10035603 -12101619 FISCAL DISP DISTRIBUTION 8980051 11798433 1662339 1967054 T I F CAPTURED VALLE -36795667 -41384093 -5171722 -6129732 NET VALUATION 287094163 341694824 48023133 56708708 TAX LEVIES GENERA_ FUND 4098000 4660000 5967200 7820000 FIRE RELIEF 70000 50000 10000 0 1986 FIRE BON1DS 0 210000 200000 36000 CERTIFICATES 420000 310000 400000 0 1977 FIRE BONDS 100000 80000 90000 70000 1980 PARK BONDS 400000 410000 420000 430000 TRAN1SPCRTATION BONDS 200000 400000 400000 400000 CITY SERVICES BONDS 430000 460000 450000 425000 TOTAL TAX LEVIES 5718000 6580000 7937200 9181000 TAX RATES GENERA_ FUND 13.54 13.60 12.425 13.789 FIRE RELIEF 0.32 0.15 0.020 0.000 1968 BONDS 0.00 0.61 0.416 0.063 CERTIFICATES 1.36 0.90 0.832 0.000 FIRE BONDS 0.40 0.23 0.187 0.123 1980 PARK BONDS 1.55 1.20 0.874 0.758 TRANSPORTATION BONDS 2.00 1.17 0.832 0.705 CITY SERVICES BONDS 1.74 1.34 0.937 0.749 TOTAL CITY MILLS 20.91 19.20 PERCENT OF TAX CAPACITY 16.523 16.187 Page 1 B EF EVOR CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 1989 BUDGET GENERAL FUND REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATED REG EbitU ADOPTED 1986 1987 1988 1989 1989 GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES CAM 5967200 7820000 DELINDOENCY ALLOWANCE 100000 100000 NET CURRENT 3426935 3940215 5867200 7720000 0 DELINULENT m i FCTIONS 118775 74132 80000 80000 PENALTY & INTEREST 338078 247443 200000 200000 TOTAL TAXES 3883788 4261790 6147200 8000000 0 REVENUE 1HOM GOVT AGENCY LOCAL GOUT AID 306875 423243 324200 331100 POLICE PENSION 83569 112745 120000 130000 RECYCLING GRANTS 36600 HOMESTEAD CREDIT 581743 643836 CIVIL DEFENSE 16951 5450 12000 12000 TDTPL OTHER AGENCIES 989138 1185274 456200 509700 0 LICENSES LICIUOR& BEER 72445 76487 77000 77000 BUILDING CONTRACTORS 8260 7765 8000 8000 ` OTHER-CIGARETTE & FOOD 12200 14266 14000 14000 TOTAL LICENSES 92905 98518 99000 99000 0 PERMITS& FEES DOG REGISTRATION 4806 5002 5000 5100 BUILDING 1467236 1263297 1400000 1400000 PLANNING & ZCINING 50584 47221 50000 50000 ENGINEERING & ADMIN 108004 686788 400000 400000 IMPOLI'ID Ft1 b 3368 4300 4400 4500 CAELE TV 32000 67000 OTHER-IDR CHARGES 37084 40733 40000 40000 TOTAL PERMITS & FEES 1671082 2047341 1931400 1966600 0 * I-OESTEAD CREDIT IS INVCLUDED IN AD VALOREM TAXES FOR BUDGET Page 2 e REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATED REQUESTED ADOPTED 1986 19E7 1988 1989 1989 RECREATION FEES 1 YOUTH PROGRAMS 32176 38601 68000 73500 ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 93834 118466 143700 147300 • CXMMUNITY CENTER 400608 403647 453800 472000 HISTORICAL 3487 2765 4990 5200 PARK USE FEES 9395 4836 6000 5000 • ADULT PROGRAMS 15460 27436 10300 14800 OTHER 11284 16000 19000 TOTAL RECREATION 554960 607035 702790 736800 0 COURT FINES 238470 208724 240000 240000 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 103562 113767 100000 100000 OTHER FUND TRANSFERS FED REVEtaE SHARING 177066 3401 UTILITY OPERATING 10000 10000 10000 10000 T.I.F. ADMINISTRATION 200000 200000 200000 10000 • LIQUOR OPERATIONS 110000 100000 100000 100000 FUND BALANCE 307900 127800 TOTAL OTHER FUNDS 497066 313401 617900 247800 0 OTHER REVENLE SCHOOL LIAISON 35237 35966 37000 37000 TREE & CHIP SALES 3000 MISCELLANEOUS 21052 283846 100000 100000 LANDFILL FEES 138203 7613 TOTAL OTHER 194492 327425 140000 137000 0 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 8225463 9163275 10434490 12036900 0 PAGE 3 BUDEXPMC7 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 1989 BUDGET GENERAL FIND EXPENDITURES PAGE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET DEPT MANA( R 1986 1987 (ADJ) REOLEST RECQTEND ADOPTED 5 LEGISLATIVE 19200 6 ELECTIONS 38408 1 14200 66100 11036 0 7 CITY MANAGER 52900 6 52900 400 4200 8 1612YU 128421 135950 136100 136100 ASSESSING DEPT 190841 207193 268200 INSPECTIONS/SAFETY/ 298900 270900 FACILITIES 9 BLDG INSrCCTION 370593 370409 9A SAFETY 468100 528600 525100 98 FACILITIES 19097E 230803 5000 5000 PARKS/RECREATION 460050 53.500 532500 10 ADMIN & PARK PLAN 102419 115982 144400 160100 160100 11 PARK MAINTENANCE 415191 438825 11A PARK CAP. OUTLAY 42592 43843 530000 563900 126900 30800 1552003 3 8 00 126900 12 ENVIRONMENTAL SERV 89122 82618 130800 130800 130800 13 RECREATION ADMIN 68849 82395 114500 108900 104500 14 COMMUNITY CENTER 404623 481900 15 BEACH 23690 21498 543300 3300 523300 569700 16 ORGANIZED ATHLETIC 116184 131194 202200 93� 96000 17 RECREATION-YOUTH 147700 147700 18 125757 128860 139500 147700 147700 RECREATION-ADLL.T 24717 45489 101100 126200 123400 19 RECREATION-ADAPTIVE 20 HIST & CUL ARTS 25900 3350033500 . 21 FINANCE 8299 8010 15800 36900 36900 22 172634 189611 192500 229200 244700 FLAMAN RESOLES 89614 104300 101600 23 HUMAN SERVICES 15600 57497 71500193200 93200 24 PLANNING DEPT 25519928500 299178 POLICE DEPT 334100 378500 3500 25 POLICE 1587238 1733276 2051400 2161400 2161400 26 CIVIL DEFENSE 18081 5652 36900 24800 26900 27 ANIMAL CONTROL 28 FIRE 29405 32419 36900 56900 �� 233481 297203 326600 371800 374800 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT 29 ENGINEERING 370518 448055 520200 30 SIHttIS & DRAINAGE 651154 793217 797100 1210500 1010500 31 EQ.IIPMENT MNTC 367253 404277 439000 32 SNOW & ICE CONTROL 72402 37244451600 494800 33 SIHttI LIGHTING 92300 7000 7000 117752 132191 150000 170000 1700O0 SHARED SERVICES 34 GENERAL 306038 495993 371800 35 DATA PRIT1SSING 46308 67976 77000 481500 4084001 36 LEA- L 13249050000 50000 37 PUBLIC INFORMATION13581714768 1310001 154600 1900pp 38 10022 14768 26100 94600 94600 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 830273 977679 1102000 1327900 1327900 & TRAINING 39 SOLID WASTE MANAGEI*ENT 40 73200 73200 RESERVE 71740 350792 128400 465000 465000 TOTAL C1\ERAI_ FIND 7680341 9136551 10426500 12294000 12036900 41 EQUIPMENIT OERTIFIC:ATES page 4 "TO, ri • association of metropolitan muniapalities PROMPT ACTION REQUESTED September 20, 1988 Dear City Administrator/Manager: The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities and the Municipal Legislative Commission have been working for sometime with the League of Minnesota Cities Coordinating Committee discussing property tax computer analysis for 1989. The LMC has committed to developing computer analysis capability for the 1990 legislative session but a transition year is necessary to be able to react and participate knowledgeably in the 1989 session. The Coordinating Committee has been negotiating with the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities for development of a property tax reform proposal for 1989, a key element of which, will be retention of the principles of a Homestead Credit. Additional background data on the research elements and product are enclosed. This effort will cost approximately $185,000 for computer data update and proposal development. To raise this amount, Minneapolis, St. Paul, the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities, the Small City organization, and the Metro Area suburbs are being asked to make contributions. The suburbs share of funding has been targeted for between $35,000 and $50,000, which will be raised voluntarily, not through any type of mandatory assessment by either the AMM or MLC. Thus, a request for financial contribution is being made of all suburban cities. Your city, along with other larger metropolitan suburbs is being asked to contribute $2,000 to this effort. Smaller suburbs are being asked to contribute an amount commensurate with their size and budget constraints. This financial pledge is 2321 183 university avenue east, st paul, rninnesota 55101 (612)227-4008 contingent upon two factors: 1) AMM and MLC Boards approvel to proceed with this project, and 2) Sufficient funding from the suburbs to raise the required amount of dollars. It may be imperative for all cities, especially suburban cities to develop a common proposal for the 1989 legislative session. Based on the 1987 and 1988 tax and school funding bills, counties and school districts are committing to a significant effort for additional funding in 1989, probably at the expense of cities. This is primarily possible because of the elimination of Homestead Credit in 1990 in favor of an aid type program. Since the suburbs are at the greatest risk if Homestead Credit is exchanged for aid, it is paramount that a strong effort be made to restore the Homestead Credit. The data base or information which should result from this one time effort will help assure that the professional staffs of AMM and MLC that represent the suburban cities will be on an equal footing with other city lobbyists in the state during the 1989 session. Without • the availability of this information and a unified position supported by all cities, success in protecting the suburban interest is in doubt. Please, strongly consider this request with your council and reply using the enclosed pledge sheet or verbally no later than Wednesday, October 5, 1988 to the AMM Office. If you have any questions, call Vern or Roger at 227-4008. Respectfully, 19174141:*\'' qd.z.vved, o"d Gary Bastian, President Richard Wedell, President Association of Metropolitan Municipal Legislative Municipalities Commission 2322 TO: ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION 183 UNIVERSITY AVE., EAST ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 FROM: CITY OF YES, OUR CITY WILL PLEDGE $ IF THIS EFFORT CONTINUES. NO, OUR CITY WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE. CITY ADMINISTRATOR/MANAGER 2323 LEAGUE COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED RESEARCH PROGRAM FOR OCTOBER THROUGH JANUARY The major research tasks recommended for the League Coordinating Committee through January 15, 1989 are briefly described below. The research tasks have been organized into three major areas of research work. I. Data Base Additions and Modifications - Add data on homeowner income related to home value and tax burden, and develop analytical model for using this data in conjunction with the property tax model. - Enhance ability to do regional totals and averages, constituency group totals and averages and average impact by property type. - Add county welfare data. - Add State Auditor's data on city revenues and expenditures for 19d7. Update data base with estimated 1989 data when available from the Department of Revenue or House Research. Most • recent information indicates that valuation data will become available in late October, and levy data will be available one or two months later. II. Background Research and Analysis of the 1990 Law • The first major research task is the analysis of the 1990 law, including its structural features and estimated impacts on property tax burdens. This research work may include analysis of the fiscal characteristics of cities in different regions of the state, and how those characteristics play a role in determining the impact of the 1990 law. III. Research to Develop Specific Proposals for Consideration by the Legislature The primary objective of this work plan is to develop two specific proposals that are acceptable to the Constituency Groups. One of the proposals would include a homestead credit and the other would not. The research involved in developing a specific proposal is difficult to describe in detail. It is generally an interactive process where alternative proposals and their impacts are described 23�y to the Committee, the Committee reacts to those proposals and provides direction for further research to refine or redirect those alternatives. Dozens or even hundreds of individual computer runs may be needed in order to design a specific proposal that is acceptable to the participants. the elements of the system that will be considered in designing a proposal may include the following: - Classifications and assessment ratios. - LGA, disparity aid, and other equalization formulas. - The homestead credit, other credits, and, in the case of the alternative proposal, transition aid payments or other programs that replace the homestead credit. - Categorical aids, such as the welfare takeover that are either in addition to or in lieu of other state-paid aids. - Fiscal disparities or tax base sharing programs. - Income adjusted property tax refunds or an income adjusted homestead credit. Extensive computer analysis is needed to assess the inter-related impact of changes to all elements of the system. It will be necessary for the Constituency Groups to focus the research effort very early in the process. without some initial policy agreements, the research effort could become unfocused and would more likely be unproductive. The research work for the first several meetings would be designed to help the members of the Committee reach a preliminary agreement on the direction that the proposals should take. The research needed to develop specific proposals may include some of the more specific research tasks already suggested by Committee members, assuming that the Committee agrees that these specific research tasks are needed. Some of the specific items suggested so far include: Analysis of impact and appropriateness of using city size as a basis for distributing aids. Elimination of split classifications; impact on tax burcens and on the distribution of aid. Research on the design of new property tax systems that do not require or encourage mill rate buy-downs or mill rate equalization. - Research on single aid programs that could replace the multiple programs in current law. 23as - Research on modifications to 1990 law to refine aid programs and classification system. - Analysis of property tax burdens by income class. - Research on impact of property tax system changes on the existing education aid formula and on school district levies. - Analysis of projected school levy changes for 1990. - Analysis of ways to reduce tax burden differences due to differences in tax base. These items illustrate the types of specific research that would be undertaken for the Committee. This research is consistent with the general structure of the recommended research program. The Committee would have to decide as the negotiations and meetings progress on the specific research to be done. Membership of the League Coordinating Committee would in include three members from each of the following groups: Minneapolis St. Paul Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Municipal Legislative Commission Association of Small Cities 23,21n MEM4R4NDVM TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: John Frane DATE: September 30, 1988 RE: Financial Consultant The staff has interviewed the two largest independent financial advisors in the Twin Cities area., Evenson-Dodge and Springsted. While either of these firms or others in the area would do an acceptable job in advising the City, preparing bond offering statements, and seeking improvements in the City's credit rating, I believe that Springsted has the ability to do a better job. The fastest growing suburbs are Apple Valley, Eden Pririe, Eagan, Maple Grove and Plymouth. Springsted serves Eagan and Maple Grove and also Burnsville which was the fastest growing in the 60's and 70's. Ehlers serves Plymouth, and Juran & Moody serves Apple Valley. Springsted also serves the Eden Prairie School District, the boundaries of which are almost the same as the City's. Just recently Moody's Investors Service raised Eagan's rating from A to Al. S 's fees are competitive pwithsotthher advisors.abWetrecommend e tthe s hateSprie been paying and are the City's financial consultant. ngated be retained as MEMORANDUM ( TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission FROM: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect DATE: September 29, 198B VVV SUBJECT: Sidewalk Along Duck Lake Trail Between Duck Lake Road and Barberry Lane The City of Eden Prairie intends to complete the hikeway/bikeway along Duck Lake Trail, from Duck Lake Road to Dell Road, before the 1988 construction season is over. The trail from Eden Prairie Road to Duck Lake Road is along the north side of the road and is a bituminous trail 8' wide. An 8' bituminous trail is planned west to Dell Road in order to continue the trail system and to be consistent with what is already installed. There is a section of 4' concrete sidewalk that was installed along the north side of the road from Duck Lake Road to just east of Barberry Lane. Staff feels leaving 4' of concrete sidewalk in place would be undesirable for two reasons: 1. A potential safety problem could develop due to the 8' trail narrowing down to 4' for a one block section. Four feet in width is not adequate for 2 passing bicycles or a bicycle and a pedestrian. • ( 2. Maintenance will be a problem, particularly during the winter when an 8' path will be plowed ripping up grass and shrubs. Using a special piece of equipment or hand shovelling is possible, but for one block section is burdensome and could set a precedent impossible to keep up with. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources staff received an estimate to add another 4' of concrete to the existing walkway expanding the width to 8'. The estimate (which has been enclosed) is between $5,000 and $5,5D0 for the additional concrete work. You should also be aware that is will leave about a 1' strip between the road and the sidewalk that will also need to be addressed. As shown on the sketch from the concrete estimator, there is a considerable difference in grade and will need to be filled with concrete, bituminous material or topsoil and sod. A fire hydrant will also need to be relocated in order for the concrete to be installed. Cost estimates for this are between $600 and $800, bringing the cost for these improvement between $5,600 and $6,300. This amount is for a trail section one block in length and will not include the 1' strip between the street and the walkway. A cost estimate for an 8' bituminous trail over the same portion of land is estimated to use 50 tons of asphalt at $18 per ton or $900 to do the entire block. The property on which this entire section of trail is to be located is within. City right-of-way. Staff would recommend tearing out the existing concrete sidewalk and installing an 8' bituminous trail for the sake of safety, maintenance, continuity of materials and width. BPC:mdd - 42 till ibeijim, • la[W- :. ' • -; *MI ; 7.,-:.,,$ l.., i 2tv..,\-N. :‘ .,,,... i .. tea, '� ' IL ' fir ` , 4... iipi ,x,„. .. .. .. _ .h. . . , , :- 14-7.. .... .‘‘., „/ . ..[-Tr 1 ' j'- :,,, 7.'*lit, SI 3 ‘, •Nit p...‘ i .Mal ,I. 094...it,.\ iloot,04:- "044 .'..,,:i....:14.::-HA,"tti. ili ■m EL 4 1k♦ ...,; . 1 u ♦ ` c - illi'ffillig11 : • :1 .. ®j 1 i !t AIM 8 1.11.11-M\\• * ..•::••••••:•lorleik .4- '" III ., . . i&,-, .,, .. '.•4° Filil- Prir`Or.7111EMT4 / • . 11.- Ill ,, 4133:11 till 3 I : 1• 111111 I • • t w r i Ali I 1 1; ; • 444.k%=q, :.tt %sat ofirr 1' AFF ails/. 1 le ..> r PPP. vN3aO1 �... tariatiah 0 b0 ' :War �. ;&,vi �y �!��%j0 II . thie11.11 1ir� �� w�� V7:-;•lignured, 1 •iii W Nfr• "wi iiiiiiiiiillit •Igs:I a,DLA )iy\ I• tt ',ei W '' , • fig SW mobil • Qualify Concrete,Specialists IC�k/ 7 H/.(/�j S TO r / For Over 7(1}inns Goiv�/dC�Z� GG ✓? EXif,T, w04LK_ __ I _ _ ` N� / � e„ T.S SoD, Z PkoPosE 2 1 C3lr. sT ET -- 1 '7;9 "? /S p C A.i / E,te Pia kr c=1,F of C vp8 o / Gv G ew T/,v t, S I d S w N L,- 7.1T k r//It. -t;. ,,v FJ 1. 7/, i2 e2 j J/d j/./Ve Cc fee 4.IPV IN b r � �`� � T.SoII N d- t44 N t C // /NMTriq/HL / r"/ ." 9A I au/r4, //EsT /3se,e or- C t.K g �T4/•:S O a/` G et=417-&-- p J.:id c W K Lk It ITH u jr.„--,(I/e/-il r — /./o r �1^e^G) • ti b�.V • • 141,1 • •33U 642,0 FLYING Cloud Dr. Eden Prairie, MN. 55344942-0606 _ Jc'Z X6i N.Jt?('N}Stt�XJ'i)4N t(X 7{tiJ4 N•NE1G H J�,XtXiN tWbp{00 X 5:`xa.ri X N X�k D;a0:;Z'.Y5Y��3;:`,SY.X 6420 Hying Cloud Drive • *205 • Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 • 612/942-0606 PROPOSAL C • � QR 09/08 19 88 •rARLSON TO:Barbera Penning Cross V T�An City of Eden Prairie Quality Concrete Specialists 7600 Executive Dr. Eden Prairie, MN. 55344 For Over 75Years We propose to furnish all materials,labor and equipment necessary to complete the following work: Cost estimate for concrete sidewalk widening from Duck Lake Roar; to Enrberry Lane, Approx. $5,000.00-5,500.00 depending on the amount of city involvement with such items as furnishing barricades or flashers for safety and traffic control, furnishing a site for excess dirt and blacktop removal, also the exact method of construction- see enclosed sketch. You might also want to pour new driveway aprons in at 6" thick vs. sidewalk at 4". The above work to be completed in a substantial and workmanlike manner for the sum of as above This proposal is for prompt acceptance.Any alteration or deviation from the above specifications sinvolving extra cost of materials or labor will only be executed upon written orders for same,and will become an extra charge over the sum mentioned in this contract. All agreements must be made in writing.In accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota you are hereby notified that the property on which this work is performed is subject to a mechanics lien if prompt payment for such work is not made, ;CCEPTED 19 Respectfully submitted BY VICTOR-CA SON AND NS,IN )32i 1 BY /117 .��/P NOTE:If this bid is accepted,please sign and return the copy to us. Jim m Coiling We the undersigned understand that the City of Eden Prairie is intending to i remove the existing cement sidewalk located on the north side of Duck Lake Trail between Duck Lake Road and Barberry. We understand the City is intending to replace this excellent sidewalk with a bituminous bike and jogging path. We feel that the existing cement sidewalk will fulfill the biking and pedestrian requirements, safely and adequately. We also feel that tearing out a perfectly good, sound and beautiful cement sidewalk to install a bituminous path is a needless and senseless waste of taxpayers' money. We hereby petition the City of Eden Prairie to utilize the existing sidewalk in lieu of installing a bituminous path. NAME ADDRESS PHONE it 6 re �.- A, 173(4D/,,,k,L9., .r.,,,ii 934 G iza w,v,,,r s -y /7d-c75-62/cF- cpT/zI- 473y-9666 C \ -,� �V 1L -1Z\lc�i a k l.LA P `-ice a)-?(n 41,2 I730, R, .L , S37-S% in tj cti tr /1 i o 1 /14 io e (-a.,% 370-334- / �--a % --,- /7Z)7 aC/e- 1-,(7/2 y 1;c 17Zo7 191/cI- (Q -7/v// 9J;7:6 07Z � �/ `4_ �" &_c__.., _ /7-le _d' -c1� �'� �-j��-'s-�.z 1,„.1i✓rn /73X) d, ,a/ 401 9137-c 7' d,33a 4. • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-217 RESOLUTIDN APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the City Engineer with the assistance of H.T.P.O. has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements to wit: I.C. 52-147 - Watermain extension on Eden Prairie Road (CSAH 4) and Pioneer Trail (CSAH 1). and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for two weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be received until 2:00 P.M., Thursday, October 27, 198B, at City Hall after which time they will be publically opened by the Deputy City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday, November 1, 1988 at the Eden Prairie City Hall, 7600 Executive Road, Eden Prairie. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on October, 4, 1988. Gary D.Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 2333