Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 09/20/1988 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1988 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7600 Executive Dirve COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Deb Edlund PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. MINUTES A. Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, July 19, 1988 Page 2D46 B. Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, August 9L 1968 Page 2065 III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List Page 2090 B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 42-88, Rules Relating to Firearms Page 2091 Regulations by Amending City Code Chapter 9, Section 9.40, Subd. 3A to Restrict the Area Where Discharge of Firearms are Permitted C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 39-88, Rules and Regulations Page 2093 Govern] Municipal Cemetery D. Request for City approval of Charitable Gambling from the Hockey Page 2096 Association of Eden Prairie E. Final Plat Approval for Fairfield (located west of Eden Prairie Page 2099 Road and south of Mitchell Lake) Resolution No. 88d95 F. Final Plat Approval for Technology Park 6th Addition (located page 2102 south of West 74th Street and east of Golden Triangle Drive (Resolution No. 88-196) G. Change Order No. 1 to Old Shady Oak Road/Rowland Road, I.C. Page 2105 52-119 City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,September 20, 1988 g H. Order Feasibility Report for Storm Sewer Facilities to Provide Page 2108 a Connect between Red Rock Lake and the Proposed Fairfield and Cheyenne Place Additions, I.C. 52-1527Resolution No. 88-197T I. Receive Feasibility Study for Watermain Extension on Eden Page 2111 Prairie Road (CSAH No. 11 and Pioneer Trail (CSAH No. 1 and Set Public Hearing Date, I.C. 52-147 (Resolution No. 88-199) J. LAVONNE INDUSTRIAL PARK BUILDING IV, by LaVonne Industrial Park Page 2112 Partnership IV. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 36-88-PUD-10-88, PUD District and Zoning District Amendment within the I-2 Zoning District on 4.64 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 on 0.25 acres, and from Rural to R1-13.5 on 0.89 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for LaVonne Industrial Park Building IV; and Adoption of Resolution No. 68-204, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 36-88-PUD-10-88, and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 33 acres for PUD District; 7.66 acres into one lot and one outlot for construction of 60,000 square feet of office/warehouse use. Location: South of Edenvale Boulevard. (Ordinance No. 36-88-PUD-10-B8, PUD District and Rezoning; Resolution No. 88-204, Authorizing Summary and Publication) K. TECH PARK 6TH ADDITION, (FKA Norseman Industrial Park 6th Addition)Page 2123 by Eberhardt/Hoyt Development. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 37-88, Zoning District Amendment within the I-2 Zoning District on 4.5 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 on 4.3 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Tech Park 6th Addition; and Adoption of Resolution No. 68-205, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 37-88, and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 24.2 acres into one lot, 2 outlots and road right-of-way for construction of a 90,600 square foot building addition. Location: South of W. 74th Street, east of Golden Triangle Drive. (Ordinance No. 37-88, Rezoning; Resolution No. 88-205, Authorizing Summary and Publication) L. THE OAKS BUSINESS CENTER--Resolution No. 88-202, Recording Page 2129 Compliance with Developer's Agreement Requirements for The Oaks Business Center (Resolution No. 88-202) M. Resolution Directing the County Auditor to Deny Division Documents Page 2131 Without Proper City Certification (Resolution No. 88-192) N. Resolution No. 88-212 Commending the Optimist Club of Eden Page 2133 Prairie for Its Ten Years of Service to the Community IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 1988 Assessment Hearing (Resolution No. 88-194A) Continued from Page 2137 September 8, 1988 B. DATASERV by Opus Corporation. Request for PUD Amendment Review on Page 2142 17.4 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 17.4 acres with a waiver for office use up to 100% within the I-2 Zoning District, Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 on 7.4 acres and Preliminary Plat of 17.4 acres into 1 lot for construction of City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,September 20, 1988 additional parking spaces for the Datasery Headquarters. Location: a South of Technology Drive, east of Prairie Center Drive. ", (Resolution #88-188, PUD Concept Amendment to Overall Prairie Center Business Park PUD; Resolution #88-189, Preliminary Plat) (Continued from September 6, 1988 Council Meeting) C. FAIRFIELD PHASES 2 THRDUGH 6, by Tandem Properties. Request for Page 2162 Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Industrial to Medium Density Residential on 49.5 acres and from Industrial to Low Density Residential on 24.4 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 148.2 acres and review of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet for con;truction of a residential development. Location: West of County Road 4, southeast of Minneapolis and St. Louis Railroad. (Resolution No. 88-206, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; Resolution No. 88-207, PUD Concept for Fairfield Phases 2-6, Resolution #88-209, Environmental Assessment Worksheet Finding of No Significant Impact) D. CHESTNUT PLACE by Chestnut Place Partners. Request for Guide Plan Page 2177 Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial on 1.69 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to N- Com on 1.69 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Preliminary Plat of 1.69 acres into 1 lot for construction of a 8,208 square foot commercial center. Location: Northwest corner of Anderson Lakes Parkway and Chestnut Drive. (Resolution #88-210, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; Ordinance #44-88, Rezoning; Resolution #88-211, Preliminary Plat) E. TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS ON PIONEER TRAIL (CSAH No. II FROM Page 2187 MITCHELL ROAD WEST TO STARING LAKE 2ND ADDITION, I.C. 52-149 (Resolution No. 88-20O) F. EASEMENT VACATION 88-D7, NORSEMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 5TH ADDITION Page 2188 (Resolution No. 88-201) V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Page 2189 VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS A. Human Rights & Services Commission - Report on Elim Homes Page 2190 Proposal IX. APPOINTMENTS X. REPORTS DF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members B. Report of City Manager 1. Fall Yard Waste Collection Proposals Page 2191 City Council Agenda - 4 - Tues.,September 20, 1988 C. Report of City Attorney D. Report of Director of Planning E. Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources F. Report of Director of Public Works 1. Approve Preliminary Plan for T.H. 5 from 800' West of CSAH Page 2202 No. 4 to Dell Road (Resolution No. 8T5f Continued from September 6, 1988 2. Award Contract for Lime Sludge Removal and Disposal, I.C. 52-151 G. Report of Finance Director IX. NEW BUSINESS X. ADJOURNMENT ( UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 19, 1988 7:30 PM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7600 Executive Drive COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Senior Planner Mike Franzen, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Deb Edlund PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: All members present. I. APPROVAL OF_A_C I4 A AiJ_OIRRFR ITEM$ OF BUmE S MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve the Agenda as published and amended. Add to the Agenda Item X.A.1, Discussion of August 2, 1988 Council Meeting. Add to the Consent Calendar Item III.L, Resolution for public improvements for Wyndham Nob, Item III.M, 2nd Reading of Ordinance M 21-88 and Approval of Development Agreement for Wyndham Nob Addition, Item III.N, 2nd Reading of Ordinance Y 26-88 and Approval of Development Agreement for Hidden Glen IV. Motion carried unanimously. «J-t • City Council Minutes 2 July 19, 1988 II. MINUTES A. Regular City Council Meeting held_Tuesday, June 7, 1988 MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held Tuesday, June 7, 1988 as published and amended. The following corrections were made: Page 8, Item IV.A, Motions 1, 2, and 3 should read: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley. . . Page 16, Item X.A, paragraph 5 should read: Harris commented that based on Dietz's concern about the need for further restriction there could be a benefit to imposing them earlier so that the City could avoid a crisis situation. Motion carried unanimously. B. Special City Council Meeting geld Tuesday. June 7, 1988 MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve the minutes of the Special City Council meeting held Tuesday, June 7, 1988 as published and amended. The following correction was made: Page 2, paragraph 7 should read: Harris believed that the program should involve the City's total population, Motion carried unanimously. C. City Council Meeting_held Tuesday, June 21, 1988 MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidiuck to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, June 21, 1988 as published and amended. The following correction was made: Page 1, Item I, paragraph 2 should read: Pidcock wished to report on two meetings of the Chairmans Advisory meeting of RTB. Motion carried 4-0 with Anderson abstaining. J.1� City Council Minutes 3 July 19, 1988 III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List B. Metropolitan_Waste jcontrol Commission Permit to Connect to Existing Facilities for Alpine Estates 2nd Addition (Resolution No. 88-141) C. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Permit to Connect to Existing_Facilities for I.C. 52-051 Mitchell/Research Road (Resolution No. 88-142) D. Department of Natural Resources Permit to Cross Public Waters for IC. 2=051Mitchell/Research Road (Resolution No. 88-143) E. Approve Special Assessment Agreement with United Mortgage Corp. Re_gard nq_Lmprovemthta_to pe11 Road F. chan.,ge._Orde,r No.t ?a—Bidden Glen 3rd Addition. I.C. 52-102 G. Approve Agreement with Barton-Aschman Associated, Inc. for Engineering Services for the Design of TH 5 from CSAH 4 in Eden Prairie to CSAH 17 in Chanhassen H. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 27-88, Amending 3,30 of the City Code to Provide for Use Restrictions During Water Elnergencigs. I. Resolution amending the Fee Resolution allowing the Imposition of a $25.00 Surcharge for Violation of Use Re.strictions_Durinq Water Emergencies (Resolution No. 88- 147) J. Approv_e._Plan.s and Specifications for Traffic Signal Installations in the Major Center Area and Set a Bid Opening. Date pf_.Aug_u_st__11, 1988 (Resolution No. 88-148) K. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 30_88, Amendinq City Code Chapter 2_iY_Repea1inq Section 2.88 Requiring tht Filing of Financial Statements Relating to Receipts and Disbursements by Candidates and Committees in Connection witthcity Elections L. Resolution receiving 100% petition, ordering improvements and preparation of plans and specifications for public improvements for I.C. 52-145, Wyndham) Nob (Resolution No. 88-120). • M. W_NDHAM NOB ADDITION, by Burl Corporation. 2nd Reading of Ordinance #21-88, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1- 13.5 on 7.96 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Wyndham Nob; and Adoption of Resolution #88-111, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance 126-88 and Ordering City Council Minutes 4 July 19, 1988 Publication of Said Summary. 30.03 acres into 14 single- family lots, one outlot and road right-of-way. Location: South of Townline Road, east of Dell Road, west of Purgatory Creek. (Ordinance N 21-88, Rezoning; Resolution #88-111, Authorizing Summary and Publication). N. HIDDEN GLEN IV, by Derrick Companies. 2nd Reading of Ordinance #26-88, Amending Ordinance N21-86-PUD-2-86 within the RM-6.5 Zoning District; Approval of Supplement to Hidden Glen North Developer's Agreement for Hidden Glen IV; and Adoption of Resolution #88-136, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #26-88 and Ordering Publicatior. of Said Summary. PUD Amendment on approximately 68 acres, Zoning District Amendment within RM-6.5 Zoning District on 8.5 acres for the construction of 40 twinhome units. Location: South of Townline Road, west of Dell Road, east of Highway 101. (Ordinance #26-88, Amending Ordinance 821-86-PUD-2-6; Resolution N 88-136, Authorizing Summary and Publication). MOTIO[J_ Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to approve the Consent Calendar as published and amended. Motion carried unanimously. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION No. 88-05, Vacation of a Portion of School Road Right-of-Way North of the Central Middle School (Resolution No. 88-140) Jullie reported that notice of this Public Hearing was published in the June 29, 1988 issue of the Eden Prairie News. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 88-140 for vacation of right-of-way for part of School Road. Motion carried unanimously. B. FAIRFIELD by Tandem Properties. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Industrial to Medium Density Residential on 49.5 acres and from Industrial to Low Density Residential on 24.4 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 148.2 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with variances for street fronLuyr and lot size on 148.2 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 on 92.7 acres and from Rural to R1-13.5 on 53.6 acres, Preliminary Plat of 148.2 acres City Council Minutes 5 July 19, 1988 into 367 single family lots, 28 outlots and road right-of- f way, review of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet for construction of a residential development. Location: West of County Road 4, southeast of the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railroad. (Ordinance No. 29-88, Rezoning; Resolution #88-137, Preliminary Plat) Jullie reported that notice of this Public Hearing was sent to owners of 53 surrounding properties and published in the July 6, 1988 issue of the Eden Prairie News. Jim Ostensen representing the proponent presented the project. Ostensen stated that the request tonight was for approval of the Preliminary Plat and the Rezoning of Phase I of the project. Ostensen stated that originally they were requesting rezoning of the entire project, but the Planning Commission recommended that only Phase I be rezoned until the Southwest Area Study could be completed. Ostensen requested a Guide Plan Change from Industrial to Low to Medium Density for approximately 40 acres. Ostensen stated that two collector roads were being proposed for the project and sewer was being installed now. Tom Boyce, President of Centex Homes, stated that the entire project would take approximately 6 to 8 years to complete. Boyce presented the 3 types of homes being proposed and emphasized the success of the cluster homes. Mike Franzen reported that the Planning Commission had reviewed this item 3 times during May and June. At the June 27, 1988 meeting the Planning Commission voted for approval of Phase I of the project with a 4-0 vote. Franzen reported that Phase I would have a minimal impact for traffic on County Road 4. Franzen stated that discussion on Phases 2 through 6 would continue after the Southwest Study was complete. Franzen reported that the developer had been directed to work with SL,tff regarding concerns of tree loss, access trails and road right-of-way for Highway 212 for Phases 2 through 6. Franzen reported that on July 8, 1988, the developer requested Staff to consider a modification to the phasing area as approved by the Planning Commission to include additional R1-9.5 lots and reduce the number of R1-13.5 lots. This was acceptable to Staff, since the number of lots for Phase I would remain the same. Lambert reported that the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed this item July 18, 1988 and voted for approval of Phase I with a 5-0 vote. 1�� City Council Minutes 6 July 19, 1988 Peterson asked Franzen if there was any change in road 11 circulation and if there were two access points to County Road 4. Franzen replied that two access points were provided. Peterson questioned if the northerly extension road going to future Highway 212 would connect to County Road 4 and what was the timing for this road. Rick Sather, a member of the proponent team, replied that the exact alignment of Scenic Heights Road was not established at this time and that the timing for the alignment was not known. Bentley asked Sather how the sewer was being proposed to connect to the school. Sather replied that the sewer was being proposed to come from the south and would require the second phasing of the project. Bentley stated that there was another property owner between this development and the school and that the property owner had expressed concern about being cut off from sewer. Bentley stated that he would like to see the sewer line come from the south and then go north. Bentley was concerned about the need for a lift station if the sewer were to go in as developer was proposing now. Sather replied that he believed it could be served without a lift station and that the only difference in providing the sewer from Phase I or from the road would be timing. Bentley asked Dietz if his assumption that a lift station would be necessary if the line came from the north. City Engineer Alan Gray stated that the sewer being proposed for Phase I of the Fairfield project could be extended in the future to provide gravity service for the Cheyenne Place development. The sewer would come from the south and then to the west and a lift station would not be necessary to serve the proposed Cheyenne Place. Bentley asked that if the line only came from the north to serve the school would a loop be necessary, which way would it flow, and when would the school need service. Gray replied that the school would need sewer service by August 1989. The sewer service could come through Phase II of the Fairfield development as Sather has outlined or as an alternative it could come through the Cheyenne development and then through Phase I of Fairfield. Gray stated that at this time the sewer was proposed to come through the Phase II development of the Fairfield project, but if this project were delayed it could come through the Cheyenne Development. Ostensen stated that what had motivated the timing of this project was to get sewer and water to the school by next fall. He was disappointed with the recommendation to approve only Phase I because it did not allow for planning for the sewer and water for the school Ostensen stated that they have worked closely with Cheyenne. City Council Minutes 7 July 19, 1988 Bentley asked if the cluster homes would be the only homes proposed for the R19.5 zoning. Ostensen replied that there would be cluster homes and standard homes on the R19.5 lots. Ostensen further commented that he understood the Council concern about constructing large houses on small lots and said that. in this particular situation specific model homes were designated for specific lots. Bentley questioned if the density would be 2.5 units per acre or lower. Ostensen replied that the only place the density would be higher was in the clusters with a density of 3.07. Peter Knaeble, representing the Cheyenne Place development, stated that they had been working with the Fairfield personnel and Staff and have had a good working relationship. Knaeble asked the Council to clarify that utilities would be available to the south property line as part of Phase I of the development so that Cheyenne could extend utilities to their property. Peterson replied that this had been so clarified. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to close the Public Hearing and approve 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 29-88 for Rezoning. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION; Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to adopt Resolution No. 88-137 approving the Preliminary Plat. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations and Council conditions to include a stipulation that utilities be stubbed out to the south end of the property line for potential extension. Motion carried unanimously. C. .L IAr__C NTER by Edward F. Flaherty & M. Austin Smith. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 18 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 18 acres with waivers within the C-Reg-Service Zoning District, Zoning District Change from Rural to C-Reg-Ser on 4.8 acres, Preliminary Platting of 4.8 acres into 2 lots for construction of a 18,845 square foot auto mall and a 22,180 square foot retail center. Location: South of Prairie Center Drive, east of Joiner Way, north of Medcom Boulevard. (Resolution No. 88-138, Planned Unit Development Concept; Ordinance No. 28-88-PUD-7-88, .PUD / City Council Minute:, 8 July 19, 1988 District and Rezoning; Resolution No. 88-139, Preliminary Plat) Jullie reported that notice of this Public Hearing was sent out to 57 surrounding property owners and published in the July 6, 1988 issue of the Eden Prairie News. Brian Cluts, representing the proponent presented the project. Cluts stated that two buildings were being proposed, one a retail center and une an auto mall. Cluts reported that buffers had been provided between the two properties, parking requirements have been worked out, and all issues raised by the Planning Commission had been resolved. Cluts expressed a concern about the requirement for the developer to enter into a special assessment agreement for the extension of Medcom Boulevard. Ed Flaherty reported that the Auto Mall was approximately 80% leased and the Retail Center was approximately 30% leased. The Retail Center tenants proposed were, Applebees, Paper Warehouse, Proex, and Horst. The Auto Mall was entirely leased with the exception of one space to the following businesses: Eden Prairie Transmission, Precision Tune, Auto Max and a car wash. Flaherty stated that he would like to break ground in early September. He said that one of the concerns of the Planning Commission was access to the property and commented that he owned the 14 acres to the south of Medcom Boulevard and would be coming before the Planning Commission with a proposal for the development of this property in the near future. Flaherty further commented that he has had discussions with Staff regarding opening up the center median on Prairie Center Drive at Joiner Way to make a left turn lane for the westbound traffic to access the property. He believed the long term solution for access to the property would be to extend Medcom Boulevard into Franlo Road and would be prepared to submit that petition. Flaherty said that in the discussions with City Engineer Gray he had proposed the possibility of a temporary access through the Joiner Way turn lane and would agree to close this up when Medcom Boulevard was extended. Flaherty said that better access to the property would be necessary within the next year. Franzen reported that the Planning Commission reviewed this item at the June 27, 1988 meeting and recommended approval on a 4-0 vote. Franzen stated that several plan revisions had been required before review by the City Council, and that all changes had been made and reviewed by City Staff. Bentley asked if Staff had a recommendation regarding the median cut proposal. Dietz replied that this had been City Council Minutes 9 July 19, 1988 discussed and that there would be some short term advantages to the left turn lane at Prairie Center Drive, 1 but any long term benefits could not be determined at this time. Dietz stated that the left turn lane would not cause any major problems within the next 2 to 3 years, but raised the following concerns: 1) The potential stacking distance with Highway 169. 2) The reduced the incentive • to extend Medcom Boulevard. 3) Consistent City efforts to keep the median closed in this area. Dietz suggested that if Medcom Boulevard could not be extended, then the median could be opened. Peterson questioned if Medcom Boulevard would be extended before access to this project was needed. Dietz replied that even without a median cut or the extension of Medcom Boulevard the project had access and Staff believed the extension of Medcom Boulevard to be a superior solution to provide access for the entire area. Peterson questioned what conditions would be necessary to get Medcom Boulevard extended. Dietz believed that a development would have to come between the Flaherty property and Franlo Road, but could not predict when this would occur. Flaherty stated that Gray had indicated that the extension of Medcom Boulevard was feasible within a year and agreed with Staff that the extension of Medcom Boulevard was the best long term solution. Flaherty stated that he would just like to know if the extension of Medcom Boulevard were going to be several more years away, so that he could return to the City Council and address the temporary opening solution; if Medcom could be extended within a year, then the median cut would not be an issue. Bentley asked if the Developer needed to deal specifically with the median cut tonight. Flaherty replied that the project would go ahead either way. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 88-138 for PUD Development Concept Approval. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley to approve 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 28-88-PUD-7-88 for PUD District Approval and Rezoning. Motion carried unanimously. f City Council Minutes 10 July 19, 1988 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley to adopt Resolution No. 88-139 approving the Preliminary Plat and to direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. D. DOHENKEMPERESTATE$ by Alex Dorenkemper. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 46 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 46 acres with waivers within the Rural Zoning District, Preliminary Plat of 46 acres into 4 single family lots, 1 outlot, and road right-of-way. Location: South of Pioneer Trail, west of Riley Creek. City Manager Jullie stated that a letter had been received requesting the withdrawal of the project. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris to close the Public Hearing and accept withdrawal of the Proposal without Prejudice. Motion carried unanimously. V. PAYMENT.O„F„ CLAIMS MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson to approve the Payment of Claims No. 43681 to No. 44002. Roll Call Vote: Anderson, Bentley, Harris, Pidcock, and Peterson all voting "AyP". Motion carried unanimously. VI. ORDINANCES_& _RESOLUTIONS VII. PETITIONS_,_._MUSTS & COMMUNICATIONS VIII. REQORTSOF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS IX. APPOINTMENTS A. Appointment of a._Representative from the Flying Cloud Airport Bus nsssmen's Aspociation to till an unexpired term_to 2L 8/89 on the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission MOTION:, Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to nominate Mr. Jay Olson for appointment to the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes 11 July 19, 1988 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to close nominaliuns and cast a unanimous ballot. Motion carried unanimously. X. REPORTS OF OFFICERSS_BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of_Counc1l Members. 1. Discussion of attendance of August 2, 1980_meeting_ Peterson reported that he and Anderson would not be able to attend the August 2, 1988 meeting. Bentley stated that acLiun could not be taken on any zoning matters with only three members and suggested changing the date. Dietz reported that a Public Hearing was scheduled for the Hamilton Road project and had been published, but that there would be time to republish. MOTIQNj Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to reschedule the August 2, 1988 City Council meeting to August 9, 1988 at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to direct Staff to republish and re-notice any and all necessary hearing statements. Motion carried unanimously. B. Report of City Manager 1. Report ou Proposalto Move the Prairie._Village__hall 4lguor Store Jullie reported that Staff had been looking at the potential of purchasing a portion of the Prairie Court Shopping Mall. Jullie said that currently the City pays substantial lease payments for space at the Prairie Village Mall and believed the purchase of space would be economically advantageous. Jullie said that he would like the Council's concurrence to continue further negotiations. Pidcock asked if it would not be costly to relocate. Jullie replied that the City would purchase the property and this would be paid off over several years after which the City would not have property payments. • City Council minutes 12 July 19, 1988 Harris questioned why the City was in the liquor business. 3 Peterson said that he would prefer that the City phase out of this business. Pidcock concurred. Harris believed that the time had come to review the issue, in light of the fact that residents are being encouraged not to use and abuse these substances. Jullie reported that this was a referendum issue in 1971 or 1972 as to whether the City should continue and it was the choice of the community to continue the operation. Jullie agreed that there were several concerns and issues, but stated that the Prairie Court developer had come to the City with the opportunity to purchase the property and this prompted the proposal at this time. Bentley suggested that the issue to continue in the liquor business should be a separate discussion, but that if the City did decide to terminate the liquor business the City would be in a better position if the City owned the property. Bentley believed that the direction of ownership would make sense. Peterson asked Bentley why the City would be In a better position owning rather than leasing if it were decided at a latter date to terminate the liquor business. Bentley replied that if the City owned the property it would be sold, but with a lease the City would be obligated for the term of the lease. Harris questioned if the time to look at the issue was when the lease expired. Bentley stated that the City was currently operating on a voter referendum and that he believed the direction indicated by City Manager Jullie should be persuade. Anderson questioned if the City Staff had considered if the sales would be affected by moving this location. The accessibility of the current facility was good. The funds that come trom the liquor store are dedicated to law enforcement and to the Parks and Recreation Department and questioned if the move affected sales what the consequences would be to these groups. Jullie replied that sales information would be available and that the indications were that the new location would be more conveniently located. Jullie further commented that the liquor store was proposed for the northeast corner of the mall at Highway 5. Peterson questioned if the communities ideas had changed on the issue since the referendum. Pidcock commented that the whole nation's attitude had changed regarding this issue and questioned if a referendum could be put on the November ballot. Pidcock asked if a grocery store would City Council Minutes 13 July 19, 1988 be located in the mall. Jullie replied Ltiat Liquor Operations Manager Dahlberg had indicated it was beneficial to have a grocery store in the vicinity, but the ability to drive up closer would be the advantage in the location. Harris believed that further discussion of the issue was required before putting it to a referendum. Peterson asked Jullie to check into having this on the agenda at another time for further discussion and check into the timing necessary if a referendum was requested. Jullie replied that he would check into the time frames required. 2. Award Contract fo Aertal Ladder Fire Truck Dawson reported that bids were opened July 11, 1988 for an aerial ladder fire truck and recommended that Simon Ladder Towers, Inc. be awarded the contract in accordance with plans and specifications pcL the bid submitted July 11, 1988. Harris asked Dawson to explain the optional progress payment. Dawson replied that in the payment procedures there are two major items involved in the delivery of material to the manufacturer, one was the chassis and one was the aerial ladder. By making a progress payment was a way the City would cover the interest costs the manufacturer would have to puy on these items and that the City would, in turn, have to pay for. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to award the contract for the aerial ladder fire truck to Simon Ladder Towers, Inc. in accordance with plans and specifications and bid submitted July 11, 1988. Pidcock said that the Clarey bid was lower than the Simon bid. Peterson replied that Simon had offered a $8,500 deduct if the same material was used as Clarey was using. Harris commented that a safety load factor was considered making the Simon bid the preferable purchase. Dawson stated that the Simon product was a better value and had better safety factors. Peterson asked Fire Chief Ron Johnson if other companies guaranteed the 400-600 pound tip load and if this load was adequate. Johnson replied that the tip load depended on the operation of the apparatus at the time. 400-600 pounds would be adequate for just the flow of water. The Eden Prairie Fire Department recommended the additional awl` Z City Council Minutes 14 July 19, 1988 load factor to allow for water flow and personnel on the ladder at the same time if necessary, which increases the stress load, as the optimum safely factor. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Reschedule date for Mid-Year Strategic Planning Session. MOTION: Anderson moved to schedule the Mid-year Strategic Planning Session for Saturday, September 10, 1988 from 9 AM to 1 PM. Motion failed for lack of a second. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris to schedule the Mid- year Strategic Planning Session for Tuesday, September 13, 1988 from 5 PM to 9 PM. Motion carried unanimously. C. Report of City Attorney 1. Draft of Ordinance Regarding Outside Storage of Recreational Vehicles Pauly reported that the language had been changed in that a pickup mounted with a topper had been removed from the definition of a recreational vehicle, some verbiage had been incorporated from the Bloomington ordinance and section F had been added to prohibit housekeeping in a parked or stored recreational vehicle. Bentley said that the original intent was that occasional use would be allowed for a day or two, but a permanent arrangement would not be permitted. Pauly said this would be difficult to enforce, but a time frame would be necessary before the final draft was written. Madeline St. James, 6440 Duck Lake Road, questioned the height and length restrictions and asked what the definition of a street was. St. James was given a copy of the ordinance to explain the height and length restrictions and Pauly defined a street as a thoroughfare on which vehicles traversed, that was owned by the public, that would include a cul-de-sac, unless the cul-de-sac was privately owned. St. James asked if there would be a grandfathering policy. Pauly replied that uses already in effect at the time the ordinance was adopted could continue as a non-conforming use, but that if there was an obvious visual violation it would be up to that individual to prove that the use was non-conforming at the time of the ordinance adoption. St. James commented that at this n)-9 City Council Minutes 15 July 19, 1988 time there are no storage facilities in Eden Prairie, the closest facility being in Shakopee. Mike McCosky, 7251 Topview Road, stated that he and his neighbors held a neighborhood meeting and were concerned about the grandfathering policy. McCosky believed that a dividing line for height restrictions was necessary and that anything over 7' should be prohibited. He believed that ordinance would be an asset to the community. Marlu Brekke, 16460 Baywood Lane, submitted a letter to the Council stating opposition to the ordinance. She believed that the people wanting the ordinance were in the minority. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to send the results of the ordinance to the Planning Commission for a public meeting. Peterson stated that his positive vote did not indicate a strong preference for passing of the ordinance. Peterson further stated that he would like to hear more public comment from the public meetings. Motion carried unanimously. D. Report of Director of Planning E. Report of Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources 1. Alternate MCA Park Entrance Location Stuff Lambert reported that the Brauer & Associates study had been completed and the north end of the Flagship Athletic Club property was the preferred site. Lambert said that he would like authorization to approach three property owners- Naegele, Feerick, and the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce representatives on the southern site- to obtain quotes on the price of these properties. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to authorize Staff to negotiate for the acquisition of the property in the north study area as the preferred site, and to obtain a price on the southern site in order to provide comparable options. Peterson asked Lambert if it would be feasible to enter into negotiations with only Feerick and if that property would be sufficient, if Naegele was not interested. Lambert replied that Naegele was not favorable when last City Council Minutes 16 July 19, 1988 approached and that because of the proposed alignment of Technology Drive, the City would prefer the northern parcel. Pidcock believed that the Council had discussed having someone with expertise to negotiate for this parcel. Pidcock was concerned that some things might not be covered in the Contract for Deed. Peterson commented that he was pleased to see this project moving along as well as the development of the recreation area. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Recommendation regarding Acquisition of the Purgatory Creek Regreatiorl_Area Lambert requested authorization to approach all of the various property owners that own floodplain property to obtain either options, Contract for Deed, or dedication of the property. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris to authorize Staff to meet with the property owners to di3cuss an acceptable form of option or Contract for Deed for transfer of property to the City in lieu of City commitments for development of the park area. Motion carried unanimously. F. Report of Director of Public Work. 1. Receive Bids and Award Construction Contract for Hj tchell Road/Research Road. I.C. 52-051 (Resolution No. 88-144) Dietz reported that the Mitchell Road bid came in approximately 15% under the feasibility estimate and Staff would recommend awarding the contract to the low bidder, Northdale Construction in the amount of $1,314,379.50. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to adopt Resolution N88- 144 accepting the bid for Project I.C. 52-051. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Rec_eiye_ajdd-aQd Award Cor,stroCtIOD CQn_tract-_ or Fr�nlo, Road, I.C. 52-132 (Resolution No. 88-145) Dietz reported that Northdale Construction was the low bidder. Dietz said that some discrepancy came up in the City Council Minutes 17 July 19, 1988 hid, in that a new bid sheet had been issued as part of an addendum, but Northdale Construction had used the original bid form and consequently left out the section for signs and striping. Dietz said that Northdale Construction had been notified of this and agreed that it would complete the project for the bid that was made. Dietz suggested a change in Resolution $88-145 to read: subject to written verification by Northdale Construction that its bid includes all signing and striping as provided in Addendum A 1, that the cost of which shall be incidental to and part of the total bid price of $237,172.75. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to adopt Resolution #88- 145 accepting the bid for Project I.C. 55-132 and as amended to read: subject to written verification by Northdale Construction that its bid includes all signing and striping as provided in Addendum N 1, that the cost of which shall be incidental to and part of the total bid price of $237,172.75. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Receive Bids and Award Construction Contract for Legion Park Utilities, I,C. 52_133 (Resolution No. 88-146) Dietz reported that Northdale Construction was once again the low bidder and recommended awarding the contract for Project I.C. 52-133. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to adopt Resolution #88- 146 accepting Northdale Construction as the low bidder for Project I.C. 52-133. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Status of the Railroad Bridge at Valley View Road, Dietz reported that several meeting had been held to try to resolve the Graffiti Bridge situation. He said that the Soo Line and the Chicago Northwestern had a hand shake agreement to abandon that 13 mile line, a portion of which ran through Eden Prairie; however, there would be a site necessary in Shakopee to divert the trains so that Chicago Northwestern could have the right-of-way. The construction of this site could cost approximately $900,000. Dietz said that there were a number of parties who could benefit if this abandonment were expedited. Dietz said that Eden Prairie could save approximately $800,000, Hennepin County approximately $900,000, State of Minnesota approximately $200,000, and the Soo Line approximately $300,000 per year. Dietz asked for Council concurrence to continue to negotiate with the Soo Line, Chicago Northwestern, Hennepin County and MnDOT to expedite this abandonment progress. Dietz said the • City Council Minutes 18 July 19, 1988 timeline was tight. He said that the ultimate goal would be to remove the existing railway embankment so that the City would not have to build a bridge in the future. Dietz did not believe the bridge adequate for light rail transit. He did not believe that by striking an agreement and paying the $250,000 the City would not be guaranteed that a bridge would never have to be constructed, but that the best approach would be not to address the issue now. Dietz further commented that this solution had the potential for a win-win situation for everyone. Peterson said that if the City could save money it would be a good return on the investment for the taxpayers. Dietz pointed out that if the City did nothing at all the City might get by with paying nothing. It was his opinion thaL if the City would be assured the abandonment would take place this year, the money to be paid would be a good investment. Lambert said that the City should also consider the property for a trail. Lambert assumed that by paying this money the City would obtain ownership of the land. Dietz said this was correct. Peterson said that a trial would need a bridge. Lambert said that many trails could be provided for the area without a bridge. Bentley was concerned about spending $250,000. He said that the City had waited for sometime on this item and wondered how much longer the City might have to wait to save the $250,000. Dietz replied that there was the potential of a "death strike" for the Chicago Northwestern and this could leave the door open for many things. Dietz believed the timing was right and that if the City could get the bridge requirement out now there would be a potential for substantial savings. Dietz believed that waiting had the potential to backfire and the City could end up spending much more. Pidcock said that the residents that drive Valley View Road everyday want something done. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to authorize Staff to continue the current posture in negotiations with authorization to expend up to $250,000 in the process. Motion carried unanimously. G. Report of Finance Director 0CL,!,3 City Council Minutes 19 July 19, 1988 XI. NEW BUSINESS_ XII. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 10:05 PM. • UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, 1988 7:30 PM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7600 Executive Drive COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Deb Edlund PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Mayor Peterson absent. I. APPROVAL OFA. ENDA ACID OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINFI MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to approve the Agenda as published. ADD Item X.A.1, Comment by Pidcock. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES A. MSnutes of Regular City Council Meeting Held Tuesday, May 17, 1988 MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris to approve the Minutes of the City Council meeting held May 17, 1988 as submitted and amended. The following corrections were made: Page 1, paragraph 1, should read: Lou McCoy. Page 18, Paragraph 7, should read: asked if the City.. . Page 20, Item E, Paragraph 4, should read: Peterson asked Enger if this .. . . Page 27, Item 10.E.1 should read: Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes 2 August 9, 1988 III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's_._Llcense_List B. 2nd.._Reading_,of Ordinance No. 30-88_, Amending City Code Chapter 2 by Repealing Section 2.88 Requiring the Filing of Fimancial Statements Relating to Receipts and Disbursements by Candidates and committees in Connection with City Elections C. Final Plat Approval for Wyndham Nob (located south of West 62ndStreet and east of Dell Road' Resolution No. 88-155 D. Approve Bids_._for Phase I_I_of the Community Center_R_egalr E. Final Plat Approval for Algine Estates 2nd Addition ilocated east of County Rd. $ 4, south of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St._Papl and Pacific Railway, in the south 1/2 of_Sect_ion_5 (Resolution No. 88-156) F. Approve Cooperative Agreement with Riley-Purgatory Creek watershed District Study for Study of Surface Water Profiles of Purgatory Creek and Other Public Waters within Eden Prairie G. Receive Petition and Order Feasibility Study for Watermain Extension on Pioneer Trail (CSAH Now 1) from Mitchell Road west to Staring Lake 2nd Addition,, I.C. 52-149 (Resolution No. 88-160) H. Change Order No. 9forwellhouse Construction., I_C_52- 072E I. Release from SpecialAssessment Agreement for the Prairie Knoll Subdivision J. Change Order No. 6 for Valley View Road, I.C. No. 51-272 K. Approve Agreement with Chicago and Northwestern Railroad Company for Storm Sewer Crossing in Legion Park, I.C. 52- 133 (Resolution No. 88-163) L. Order_Feasibility Report for Watermain Extension on Eden Prairie Road AgSAH No. 4) from Easy Slrcet to proposed Fair_field__Add_itlox. I.C. 52-147 (Resolution No. 88-164 M. APPROVINGCDBG YEAR_XIV EXPENDITURE--Authorizing Execution of Agreement with South Hennepin Human Services Council and Authorizing Assignment of Administrative Responsibilities to Hennepin County-- H.O.M.E. Program (Resolution k88-154) City Council Minutes 3 August 9, 1988 N. PRAIRIE COURTS RETAIL CENTER--Request for Extension of Developer's Agreement to August 5, 1989. Ih(l/LI O N: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve Items A - N on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. IV. PUBLIC_HEARINGS A. MINNESOTAMINI_STORAGE by Bruce Hubbard. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from office to Industrial on 7.7 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 from 2.35 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 7.7 acres into one lot for construction of 44,255 square feet of storage buildings. Location: Northwest of Flying Cloud Drive, southeast of U.S. Highway p 169. (Resolution #88- 149, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment: Ordinance p31-88, Rezoning; Resolution #88-150, Preliminary Plat) City Manager Jullie reported that Notice of this Public Hearing was sent to the owners of 16 surrounding properties and published in the July 27, 1988 issue of the Eden Prairie News. Bruce Hubbard presented the project. Hubbard stated that he was requesting to expand the Mini-storage to the adjacent property, provide a new entrance, create a new office space and an additional apartment unit. Hubbard said that the plan had been revised to show additional landscaping as recommended by the Planning Commission. Hubbard commented that some heated units would be available. Enger reported that the Planning Commission reviewed this item at the July 25, 1988 meeting and recommended approval of a Comprehensive Guide Change from Office to Industrial, a rezoning from Rural to I-2 Park and replatting cf the property into one parcel on a 5-0 vote subject to plans dated June 24, 1988 and Staff report recommendations dated July 8, 1988. Pidcock asked how the units would be heated. Hubbard replied that the new building would be heated to approximately 50 degrees and described how this would be accomplished. Bentley asked why two separate apartment units were proposed. Hubbard replied that one unit was to replace the existing manager's apartment and that because of an increase in the number of projects in the Twin Cities and the size of this project, an assistant manager was deemed necessary and the second unit would house this assistant manager. • City Council Minutes 4 August 9, 1988 Anderson asked if the berm needed to be watered how this would be accomplished? Hubbard replied that currently they had a well and that a sprinkler system could be attached. Anderson said that currently water could not be placed on the berm along the highway. Hubbard said he would have to use hoses along the berm to keep the plantings alive. No further comments from the audience. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 88-149 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 33-88 for Rezoning. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to adopt Resolution No. 88-150 approving the Preliminary Plat and direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. B. EDEN CREEK by JMS Equities, Inc. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Public Open Space to Low Density Residential on 1.9 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 6.6 acres, Preliminary Plat of 6.6 acres into 10 single family lots, one outlot, and road right-of-way. Location: Southeast of County Road #4, across from Mere Drive. (Resolution #88-151, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; Ordinance #32-88, Rezoning; Resolution #88-152, Preliminary Plat) Jullie reported that notice of this Public Hearing was sent to 55 surrounding property owners and published in the July 25, 1988 issue of the Eden Prairie News. Jeff Schoenwetter, representing the developer, presented the project. He said that the project was an in-fill project consisting of 8 lots which helps to combine the two adjacent home sites. Enger reported that the Planning Commission reviewed this item at the July 11, 1988 meeting and recommended approval on a 5-0 vote for the request of Rezoning and Replatting, subject to the Staff Report of July 8, 1988 and subject to • City Council Minutes 5 August 9, 1988 further progress reports regarding the following concerns of residents: 1) Transition. 2) Drainage. 3) Potential fertilizer pollution from the yards. 4) Park issues. 5) Road Alignment. Enger reported that a tree replacement plan had been submitted due to a 26% tree loss and a revised plan had been provided to reflect the reconstruction of the existing by-pass lane on County Road 4. Enger said there were currently septic systems and wells on the property and suggested the capping of these systems per City Code. Enger stated that the sheds on lot 10 would be relocated to meet City Code. Enger reported that the developer had agreed to these items. Enger addressed the concerns of the Planning Commission, the intersection onto County Road 4 would be an offset intersection by 150 feet. Hennepin County would prefer that proposed Nancy Drive and Mere Drive align directly across from each other. Enger said that having the road align would provide a full intersection with County Road 4 and eliminate the need for two T intersections; however, the sight distance would not be as good as with the northern access, there would be additional tree loss, and some grade problems. Enyur reported that the developer was prepared to provide the road at either alignment. Regarding the drainage issue Enger said the drainage would be collected into two catch basins and would outlet to the Purgatory Creek floodplain. Enger reported that there was concern about lawn area into the floodplain on lots 6 and 7. He said the amount of these lost in the floodplain area was kept to a minimum and was covered by a drainage and utility easement. Enger further commented that the City does not have park plans for this area and that no trail access was proposed for this area. Enger said that residents were concerned about tree replacement because other subdivisions in the area had not replaced the trees. Enger said that the tree replacement policy was relatively new and did not believe the other subdivisions in the area were under the new policy. Lambert reported that the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission reviewed this item at the August 1, 1988 meeting and recommended approval with a 6-0 vote. Lambert said that concerns were raised regarding the need for a neighborhood park. He said that the area was within the service area of Eden Valley Park and Birch Island Park; however, neither of the parks were easily accessible because of County Road 4. Lambert said that the Commission noted that a neighborhood park was not planned iron :7 2-1 City Council Minutes 6 August 9, 1988 within this area and suggested that in the ultimate design of County Road 4 that a 5' concrete sidewalk or an 8' bituminous trail be constructed from Birch Island Park south all the way to Highway 5. He said it was the Commission's belief that the City should provide safe access to the existing parks in lieu of building another park. Bentley asked Lambert what the City was going to do with this small section of property in the floodplain and if there was maintenance required. Lambert replied that the City had a policy to acquire floodplain on all creeks so that the City had control of the floodplain for flood control and conservation purposes. Bentley questioned if the City would be able to get access to the property if needed because the City did not own any adjacent property. Lambert replied that the City could access through a utilities easement if necessary, but for park purposes there would not be an access. Bentley asked where the utility easement was currently. Dietz replied there was a 20' easement proposed at the end of the cul-de-sac. Pidcock asked if resolution had been made regarding the frontage of the proposed lots and are the first three lots already existing along County Road 4? Enger replied that a resolution had not been made regarding the widths of these lots and the adjacent lots to the north. Enger said that because of the heavy vegetation along the north property lines there was adequate transition between the R-13.5 and the R.22. Anderson asked if there would be a passing lane for south bound traffic on County Road 4 to allow for left turns onto Nancy Drive. Dietz replied there would be a by-pass lane. Anderson questioned how long that lane would be. Dietz replied that it would be 300' north of the intersection and 50' south of the intersection. Anderson then questioned if there would be a right turn lane on Mere Drive. Dietz believed there was a right- turn lane currently at Mere Drive. Anderson commented that the traffic shouldn't be bottled up in this section of road and was concerned about adding more intersections into an area with a 40-45 MPH speed limit. Bentley said that this would be a strong argument for favoring one intersection rather than the two T-intersections. Pidcock asked Dietz if the streets aligned, would it not be preferred to have them be named the same. Dietz replied yes, that if the streets would align it would be an easterly extension of Mere Drive. Mary Olson, 6615 Eden Prairie Road, stated opposition to the intersection aligning with Mere Drive and believed it more advantageous to have the intersections staggered. l ) City Council Minutes 7 August 9, 1988 She was concerned about not being able to see the children at the bus stop. Olson believed the plan as proposed $ would be adequate. She was also concerned about the drainage run off and environmental protection and hoped to encourage new residents to keep the area natural. Doug McChane, 6625 Rainbow Drive, stated concern about the overuse of County Road 4 and having the school bus stop on County Road 4. McChane asked if the drainage from the back of the cul-de-sac would also be going into a sedimentation basin with adequate right-of-way allow room as he was concerned about fertilizers draining into the floodplain. Dietz replied that the sedimentation trap would be a sand sump which was required of all storm sewers before entering a creek area. Dietz said that at the south end of the cul-de-sac there would be a deepened area in the catch basin to catch sand and silt, but it would not do much to help with the fertilizer or oil. Ray Stodola, 6625 Eden Prairie Road was concerned about the dangerous situation that would be created if Nancy Drive and Mere Drive would align. He was concerned because of the curve to the south and the speed of the traffic. Gail Beno, 6618 Rainbow Drive stated that her property was zoned R1.22 and the luta that would back up to her property would be R1-13.5 and would like to request that a transitional area be provided and that the 4 lots also be R1.22. She expressed concern about aesthetics of R1-13.5 development and openness of backyards. Bentley said that he believed that transition would be met because even though the lots were zoned R1-13.5 all of the square footage of the lots could fit into an R1.22 zone with variances. Bentley explained that the reason the Beno lot and the others were zoned R1.22 was because sewer was not available at the time of their development. Bentley said that the plan showed the homes to be placed as close to the front of the lots as City ordinances would allow. Beno asked if this meant that they would be built as shown. Enger replied that this placement could be made a condition of the project. Bentley commented that the School District controls where the school buses stop and that this item was not under the Councils control. Anderson questioned if a school bus could turn around in a cul-de-sac without backing up. Harris commented that the trees and shrubs would remain in place to help with the transition. Mike Rueter, 6602 Rainbow Drive, stated the concern about the amount of traffic on County Rudd 4. He favored a straight-across alignment, but said it would be dangerous ,Z71 City Council Minutes 8 August 9, 1988 with either alignment. Rueter was concerned about the amount of fill being brought in and how this would effect the water run off. Mary Olson commented that she had talked with the School District's Transportation Department and a school bus could not come into the cul-de-sac. Dick Olson, 6615 Eden Prairie Road, stated the concern about the sight- line distance because of the large hill and believed this to be a dangerous traffic area. George Grantier, 6626 Rainbow Drive, stated the concern about traffic on County Road 4 and sight distances of the proposed intersections. Grantier believed more traffic control, traffic signals, and street lights were needed. He commented that there were few major streets in Eden Prairie running north to south. Grantier asked where the 1.9 acre open space was located and commented that part of his property was in the floodplain. Grantier commented that from the information presented tonight that nothing could be done to help with the fertilizer and oil run off into the floodplain, but stressed the need for the City to deal with this problem. Bentley agreed with Grantier; however, this was a large scale problem that was not specific to this development and commented that this project could not be held back because of this factor. Schoenwetter stated that his firm had spent a great deal of time with Staff to come up with the best use for this site. He said that the currently proposed road alignment offered the greatest sighL distances. Schoenwetter said that he had talked with the Olsons regarding the school bus issue and believed that with the proposed road alignment and sight distances of 1,000 to 1,200 feet, the safety issue had been dealt with. He added that the project had been decreased by 3 lots from the original proposal and that 1.2 acres had been dedicated to the floodplain. Schoenwetter said that if the road were moved to the south there would be grading problems, a sight distance problem upon entering the development. He further commented that Hennepin County had looked at the road as proposed and had given approval. Pidcock said that she empathized with the residents' concerns, but the Council would have to go with what would be best for the City in the long term. Pidcock asked Dietz if the best solution would be the alignment across Mere Drive. Dietz replied that Hennepin County would prefer the Mere Drive alignment as the best long term solution. City Council Minutes 9 August 9, 1988 Harris said that because of the comments tonight and the f indefinite time frame for upgrading County Road 4, she 1 believed the City would be best served by the alignment as proposed by the developer. Harris further commented that she recognized however, that once In place this location could create problems for the upgrading of County Road 4. Harris said she would like to have the opinion of Staff based on sight lines that having Mere Drive align would be acceptable or the preferred alternative. Anderson questioned if the County had checked the sight lines. Schoenwetter replied that its engineers and surveyors had measured the sight lines and that the distance was 1,000 feet in both direction. He said that the County had not done a physical or visual check. Bentley said that as now proposed, lot 10 would be the only lot affected if realignment of the road were done in the future. Bentley said that a consideration would be that this lot could be subdivided and currently no home was involved. Dietz said that there were good reasons for either alignment. Dietz advised Council that if it were considering realignment in the future it would need to reserve the right-of-way now. Dietz said the decision point should be made now. He added that technically both alignments would work; however, in the long term the Mere Drive location would be best. Dietz said that initially the northern alignment would be safer and that the trade- off would be the safety factor now for a better situation in the future. Pidcock asked Stodola if this would be a hardship for him. Stodola said he did not know at this time. MOTION:_ Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 88-151 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION:. Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 32-88 for Rezoning. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes 10 August 9, 1988 MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to adopt Resolution No. 88-152 approving Preliminary Plat $ 1 showing proposed Nancy Drive offset to the north of Mere Drive intersection with Eden Prairie Road. Motion carried unanimously. Bentley said that he did not like road not lining up, but the sight distance would be better with the proposed alignment. He commented that the scenario was not good either way, but considered this alignment best at this time. Pidcock said that she also had problems with this issue, but believed this best at this time. Harris said that this was a decision that no one was comfortable with, but that considering the length of time that the State takes for road improvements she had to consider the residents safety first. Anderson said that he also would like to have the roads line up, but that the issue was safety. Anderson commented that he anticipated the possibility of the speed slowing and more stop signs in this area as it grows. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations and the following Council Conditions: 1) Reserve the right-of-way for possible southerly realignment of the road. 2) The buildable portion be designated as the front 50% of the lot for lots 1 thru 4. 3) First-floor elevations be raised for lots 6 and 7. 4) New driveway connections be constructed for lots 5 and 10. Motion carried unanimously. C. PANNEKOEKEN HUIS OF_EDENPRAIRIE by Marco Construction. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Regional Commercial on 1.24 acres, Zoning District Change from Office to C-Reg-Service on 1.24 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals for construction of 79,020 square feet of office and restaurant use. Location: Northwest of the intersection of Eden Road and Glen Lane. (Resolution #88-153, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; Ordinance #33-88, Rezoning) • City Council minutes 11 August 9, 1988 Jullie reported that notice of this Public Hearing was sent to 15 surrounding property owners and published in the July 27, 1988 issue of the Eden Prairie News. Norman Brody, representing the proponent introduced Paul Strother, architect for the project. Strother presented the project as a Pannekoeken Huis restaurant for the upper level and a 2,200 square foot office area for the lower level. He said that two walkways were being proposed along with a deck and gazebo to take advantage of the lake. Strother said that a sight study was done per the request of the neighbors and the results were screening being provided by a 6' mason screen wall, a trash enclosure with doors and an extensive buffer on the west property line with evergreen trees and shrubs. Brody stated that the staff recommendations had been reviewed and concurred with those recommendations. Brody pointed out that the finishing of the office area was being withheld until the traffic issue was resolved and was requesting that the deck and gazebo not be constructed until the office are was finished. Enger reported that the Planning Commission reviewed this item at the July 11, 1988 meeting and recommended approval for rezoning and platting on a 5-0 vote for the construction of a restaurant subject to the Staff Report of July 8, 1988. Enger pointed out the three alternatives that this project had to deal with traffic. He said the trip generation for the restaurant would be higher than what the BRW Study recommended for this area. Enger said that Pannekoeken Huis had furnished traffic information for all of it's restaurants and this report showed a lower trip generation and a different peak hour than that of other commercial uses in the major center area. Enger said that the Planning Commission considered that this might not always be a Pannekoeken Huis; however, in terms of traffic a decision needed to be based on what was known today. Enger reported the alternatives were: 1) build as proposed and acquire additional land 2) construct a smaller restaurant 3) accept the trip generation information from Pannekoeken Huis. Enger said the Planning Commission recommended alternative M 3. Enger said that the developer had suggested that the finishing of the lower level for office space be delayed until the restaurant was in operation and the traffic data updated. Enger said that the Planning Commission concurred. He reported that a variance was required and 4 City Council Minutes 12 August 9, 1988 Lhat the developer would be going before the Board of • Appeals next week. Lambert reported that the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission reviewed this item at the August 1, 1988 meeting and recommended approval on a 6-0 vote. Lambert said that it was recommended that the access trail run along the eastern end of the property in the form of an 8' asphalt trail or a 5' concrete sidewalk according to City standard regarding grade and constructed without steps; however, steps may be required because of the grade. Lambert said that there was discussion regarding land area by the lake for restaurant use. Lambert said that there were not provisions for this, the plan had always been to request a trail be constructed around the lake and had not anticipated any requirement for public space for restaurant use; however Lambert did not rule out the possibility of a wharf or deck on the lake at some time in the future. Harris asked Brody if the trip generation was such that it was not feasible to use as office space, would it be used for storage or was another use proposed. Brody replied that the space would be used for storage or rented out for storage. Pidcock asked what height the trees would be when put in. Strother replied that the trees would be 6 to 8 feet tall. Pidcock asked why the developer wanted to put off construction of the gazebo. Brody replied that this was designed as an amenity for the office. Pidcock asked what would happen if the restaurant was not successful, what other use for the property did the developer foresee. Brody replied that it was definitely a restaurant site, but that the building was designed so that it could be used as completely office space. Anderson asked if an outdoor watering system was proposed along the street and property line. Brody replied that the plant material would be irrigated by an inground sprinkler system. Bentley asked if the developer had a lease with the Pannekoeken Huis. Brody replied that they had negotiated a lease with Dutch Magic Incorporated, which was a Pannekoeken franchisee, which currently had three other locations in Minnesota. Dutch Magic Incorporated had indicated that if a franchise with Pannekoeken Huis was not possible that they did want to go forward with a breakfast house at this location. Brody stated that at this time they were operating under the assumption that it would be Pannekoeken Huis. Bentley was concerned that 207E • City Council Minutes 13 August 9, 1988 what was being proposed might not be what was going to be built. Pidcock stated expressed disappointment that this proposal had been represented to be a Pannekoeken Huis and now the Council was being told that this was not necessarily so. Brody stated that they had gone through this process before in other areas and had every reason to believe that this would be a Pannekoeken Huis. Anderson asked Brody if they had a signed lease before construction at the Long Lake facility. Brody replied that at the time construction began they had the lease, but that at the time they went before the Council in Long Lake they did not have a signed lease. Enger commented that it was a common situation; the developer knows the exterior design of the building and it would be some type of breakfast house. Enger suggested that the developer be asked if the lease issue could be resolved between the 1st and 2nd Reading. Brody replied that if this was a condition the Council wished to require then he would try to satisfy it. Bentley was concerned about the deck and gazebo being constructed on the property when the City was already compressing shoreline ordinances. Enger replied that the intent was for this lake to be an urban lake and utilized and would encourage the idea of an outdoor dining facility. Bentley asked if it would be possible for the Planning Commission to develop a development scenario for the lake that would give the type of use expected for the lake and the type of amenities you would like to see on this lake. Enger replied that he would like to do this. There were not further comments from the public. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 88-153 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris to approve 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 33-88 for Rezoning and direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations and the following Council Conditions: 1) An outdoor sprinkling system be provided. 2) 2nd Reading would be contingent upon a signed lease agreement with the Pannekoeken Huis. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes 14 August 9, 1988 D. HAMILTON_ROAD ,IMPROVEMENTS I I.C. 52-131 (Resolution No. 88-158) Jullie reported that notice of the Public Hearing was published in the July 27 and August 3, 1988 issues of the Eden Prairie News and all affected property owners had been notified and sent copies of the feasibility study. Dietz reported that at the current time this road did not have curb, gutter or storm sewer. Dietz presented pictures of the road to show the potholes and the deterioration of the pavement. He said that the City had been criticized about the level of maintenance on this road, but maintenance had been difficult because of the amount of water on the road and the upgrading of the road had been anticipated. Dietz said that a part of the road had been removed and was currently gravel. He said that one of the owners had done some excavation work and blocked off the drainage causing an icing condition in the winter and standing water on the road much of the time. Dietz presented the two alternatives that were studied. Alternate 2 would be more expensive and would not provide any better solutions for the problems and therefore Alternate 1 was being suggested. Dietz said that an assessment would be proposed on an area basis because the "center island" property would have a high assessment if a front footage assessment was used, and as this was a drainage project it was appropriate to use an area benefit basis. Dietz pointed out that the assessment for the project were significant; however, the businesses were sizable in area. He said the area to be assessed was 22 acres with an assessment of $16,000 per acre. Dietz said there were potential easements necessary. He said that the project would be best for early spring. Dietz presented a letter from D. A. Johnson, property owner in the area, stating objection to the project mainly because of the high costs. Johnson believed that the City was taking extreme measures to correct a drainage problem. Dietz stated that in spite of the objection he believed the project should proceed. Gary Clipper stated that the puddle of water pictured in the slides was there all the time. He said that the problem appeared after Mr. Starkey brought in fill to provide parking for employees. Clipper said that the road was impassable most of the time. He did agree that the road needed repair, but believed that the extent of the repair and expense was excessive. City Council Minutes 15 August 9, 1988 Jack Clauster stated that it looks like the water was coming from a spring. He agreed that something should be done with the road. Bentley was concerned about the deterioration of the road. He commented that the road was an investment for the City and needed to be replaced. Bentley said that the road also needed to be brought up to industrial standards, which would mean widening the road and installing storm sewer, curb and gutter. He said that if the road was repaired without dealing with the drainage problem the road would just deteriorate again, thus the project needed to be done properly. Bentley said that from a public safety prospect the cul-de-sac was necessary. Clipper said he did not believe that there was a drainage problem. He said the area was a light traffic area and since he was paying for the improvements, he questioned the need for a new road. Bentley asked Dietz if the project was approved, over what time period would this be paid. Dietz replied the current policy was 20 years at the interest rate at the time of the assessment hearing, which was now at 8%. Clauster said that he appreciated the stretch of time; however, he believed the taxes in Eden Prairie are probably the highest in the State. He believed that the flood of last year had caused a lot of the damage, as it had in other areas throughout the city. Clauster commented that this was a low traffic area and believed the cost was too high. Bentley pointed out that this was not an assessment hearing. He said the hearing would be in the Fall of 1989 and payment would begin in 1990. Dietz stated that he would agree that standing water was not a problem in a lot of the areas; however, there were no ditches in the area or any place for the water to go. Dietz believed that the road needed to be brought up to industrial standards. Harris was concerned about the safety of traffic and pedestrians on this road, due to the large size of the potholes. Pidcock commented that she empathized with the business owners, but believed the improvements were necessary. There were no further comments from the public. a0 7 Q • City Council Minutes 16 August 9, 1988 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 158 Ordering Improvements and Preparation of Plan and Specifications for I.C. 52-131 for Hamilton Road Improvements. Motion carried unanimously. E. VACATION88=0.6 __PART_._OF EDENVALE BOULEVARD IN LAVONNE INDUSTRIAL PARK (Resolution No. 88-159) MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 88-159 to vacate the right-of-way on Edenvale Boulevard. Motion carried unanimously. V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS, MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris to approve Payment of Claims No. 44003 to No.44371. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Harris, Pidcock voting "Aye". VI. ORDINANCES._._&_RESOLUTIONS VII. PETITIO..NS,__RE9UESTS_ & COMMUNIgATIONS A. Resolution_No..__88_16i,_S_pecial AAsessments Dietz said that the alternate date of September 8, 1988 was presented because the assessment amount was approximately S3,000,000 and the hearing was estimated to run approximately two hours. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson to adopt Resolution No. 88-161 with the hearing date set for September 8, 1988 at 7:30 PM. Motion carried unanimously. VIII. K>PQRTS-„OF_.ADVIQRY-.COMMISSION$ IX. APPOINTMENTS X. REPORTS OF OFFICER$.., BOARDS &..CQMMIS,$ _OHS A. RePQ.rts.._ot_._C9u11c.11._Membgr4_ • f)V('° • City Council Minutes 17 August 9, 1988 1. Comment byPidcock_ Pidcock asked the status of the Ordinance for burial of utility lines. Jullie replied that he had spoken with NSP and that NSP would be coming to the City after the first of the year with a proposed franchise agreement. Jullie had informed NSP of the potential requirement for underground utility lines. He said that the cost for this would be tremendous and would affect the rate structure. Jullie suggested waiting on the Ordinance until NSP had come to the City with the franchise agreement. Bentley asked if the City would impact the rates established by the Public Utility Commission. Pauly replied that any added cost would be reflected in the rate structure, but would not cause any direct interference. Jullie said that it was currently a requirement of any new subdivision to bury utility lines. Bentley stated that STaff had been directed to draft an ordinance and asked about its status. Jullie replied that this had been discussed at Staff meetings and was on Liu City Attorney's list of things to do. Pidcock asked when the Council could expect to see a draft. Jullie replied that 60 days would be reasonable. Pidcock asked how the sprinkling ban was going. Jullie was not aware of any problems, compliance was being met. B. Report, of._City Manager _ 1. 1_9.8 7_Aud it_iepor t. Jullie reported the 1987 audit report had been completed by Fox, McCue & Murphy. Jullie introduced John Brand of Fox, McCue & Murphy and Finance Director John Frane. Jullie stated that the audit showed an excess revenue over expenditures that increased the General Fund balance by approximately $2.3 million; however, approximately $460,000 of this amount had been reserved for expenditure in 1988 leaving approximately $1,835,000. Bentley commented that the report was good overall and believed that the City could not go through growth without having some minor problems coming out. Bentley believed that a position for a department head for a department called Budget and Procurement should be established and the role of this individual should be to assist the manager in budget preparation, help develop and maintain an accrual budget concept, and would deal a centralized procurement system. City Council Minutes 18 August 9, 1988 Bentley said that he thought that the personnel manual had been updated since 1979. Jullie replied that this task was quite involved, but that the manual would be completed by the end of the year. Bentley asked where Staff was regarding a written capitalization policy and doing a physical inventory. Frane replied that the physical inventory would take a long time to finish. He said he needed to get the costs, see what had been bought, and see what the City had. Jullie replied that Staff was working on the inventory; however, it takes a lot of time and staff time had not been available. Frane said that he needed to make priorities and that the special assessment had taken priority. Bentley asked about the updating of a policy and procedures manual for special assessments. Jullie replied that he did not believe that a tailor made special assessment policy book could be done because of the number of exceptions which have been and would be made. Jullie did believe that the deferment policy had been clarified. Bentley asked Jullie if he did not agree with the recommendation. Jullie replied that all the policies did need to be put together in one place. Pidcock was concerned because several of the same issues kept coming up year after year and nothing was being done. Harris asked why such a big difference in revenues between the two liquor stores. Frane replied that the MGM Liquor opened in Bloomington and had taken approximately 1/3 of the sales. Harris asked if the prices were the same in both stores. Frane said that they tried to keep the pricing the same, but the markets were different in each store. Bentley said he would like more information on the deficits in the water fund and what was being proposed to deal with this. Frane replied that the City had raised the rates for the water and sewer and that the City should be able to tell the results by the end of the year. There was a lengthy discussion about Enterprise Funds and General Funds as to where operating cost and capital costs come from. Harris asked if the City could not get a better rate of return than 6 1/2% interest. Frane reported that the City had revised the investment plan and the rate was not 7 1/2 to 8 %. Frane said the City could buy only government securities. A lengthy discussion followed regarding { mutual funds and government securities. • 'oJr 2 • City Council Minutes 19 August 9, 1988 Pidcock asked how street signs were purchased without a formal bid. Jullie replied that Staff was concerned about quality; however, next time the signs would go out for bid and specifications would be written. Pidcock questioned the non-compliance regarding collateral and how could this be corrected. Brand replied that it was a bank problem and could be corrected by entering into a pledge agreement. Bentley commented that Finance Director Frane, his staff, and Fox, McCue & Murphy should all be complimented. Anderson asked if Staff believed that most of the list of recommendations were achievable within the year. Frane replied that the asset inventory would not be possible. Bentley asked if the Council could have a report as to the status of the progress on the recommendations. He said he would like to hear what Staff believed would be the best way to deal with the recommendations. Pidcock said that she would like to get a time frame on when the items could be implemented. 2. Receive and._._Approve.__2nd�uarter General Fund_ltgporI_ Harris asked if the City was on an accrual basis. Frane replied it was only at year-end. Harris believed the Council should know what was encumbered as well as what was expended. Bentley agreed and said that was why he believed the additional budget staff position was necessary. Pidcock asked Brand what length of time it would take to convert to an accrual system. Brand replied that the City had the computer system in place and if the personnel could be acquired it could happen during 1989. Frane said if personnel were available, possibly in 1990. Harris asked Lambert about what the impact would be for next year if tree inspectors could not be hired. Lambert replied that Stu Fox was currently inspecting the trees by himself on an on-call basis or by just driving through town. He said that there are few people in the field and they can pick the jobs they want. Lambert said that the City may have to accept personnel not in the forestry field and would suggest that Stu Fox train them. Anderson questioned if the City should continue to put the effort and expenditure in the program. Lambert believed that it was important to maintain the program. He said that compliance with the program had kept the tree loss down. �U�3 City Council Minutes 20 August 9, 1988 Pidcock question why the receipts for building permits was a concern. Jullie replied that the volume of permits was down and it was hard to predict the construction business. Harris asked if this was a metro problem or Just in Eden Prairie. Jullie replied it was a metro problem. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to recommend approval of the 2nd Quarter General Fund Report. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Report-_.of-.Eormati_on_ot_Was_t.e_Memagement_Comm.is-sion Bentley suggested that this item be continued, since the Mayor Peterson was absent and he was the one who initiated the proposal. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson to continue this item to the August 16, 1988 City Council Meeting. Motion carried unanimously. 9. Jullie reported that Rogers Cable had made an agreement to sell to an organization in Houston, Texas. C. Report_of C1ty_Attorney D. Repor,t_of_._Director of_Planning E. Repoct. of Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources 1. Approve Playground EguLpment Bids for Willow Park,, Wyndham _Knoll Park, and Eden Lake School Park Lambert explained the bid process and how specifications were written for the playground equipment. Lambert stated that the neighbors of Wyndham Knoll Park would not be getting exactly what they had requested. He recommended approval of the bids and at the Wyndham Knoll Park supply two lower platforms, due to the number of small children in the neighborhood. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to award the contract for Eden Lake School/Park- Phase II to Earl F. Anderson Landscape Structures in the amount of $15,000. Motion carried unanimously. f 20 City Council Minutes 21 August 9, 1988 MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to award T.S. Howard the contract for Wyndham Knoll Park and Willow Park in the amount of $8,000 each with the authorization to add two lower platforms to the Wyndham Knoll Park. Anderson asked how long had the procedure been to talk to the neighborhood about park equipment. Lambert replied only when a neighborhood already was in existence. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Request from Eden Prairie Figure Ska e Clu_p, Lambert reported that the Eden Prairie Figure Skaters Club had requested to hang a banner in the lobby of the Community Center. Lambert recommended that the banners not be hung on the wall; however, did suggest hanging a banner from the ceiling. He believed that it was important to have the banners of the organizations participating, but stressed the need to be consistent. Lambert said that only temporary banners could be hung on the walls. Bentley cautioned that this not get out of hand and to use discretion. MOTION:_ Harris moved, seconded by Bentley moved to approve the banner display policy at the Community Center as per Staff recommendations. Lambert said that the permanent group would have permanent banners that hang from the rafters and temporary signs would be designated for teams on the ice. He said that the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission would decide when the banner had to be replaced. Bentley said that the Council would retain Lhe right to take this privilege away. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Flying_cloud,.A.irpor,x_Recommendations Lambert stated that the public hearing will be held in September and October. Lambert requested authorization to write a letter to the Metropolitan Airports Commission to consider other appropriate uses for the property as outlined in his memorandum. City Council Minutes 22 August 9, 1988 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson to authorize the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission to write a letter to the Metropolitan Airport Commission addressing concerns as outlined in the Staff Report and forward a draft of the letter to the Flying Cloud Advisory Commission for approval. Bentley was concerned that the City was bypassing the Flying Cloud Advisory Commission. Lambert said that he would draft a letter to the Flying Cloud Advisory Commission. Anderson said that this was important to get included in the Airport master plan and address issues early. Bentley requested that the Council be updated and would like to have a Joint meeting with the Metropolitan Airports Commission. Motion carried unanimously. 9. Review of Scenic Easement Policy Lambert reported that he had discussed the Scenic Easement Policy with both the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission and the Planning Commission and that both Commission recommended approval per the report. He suggested having the City Council hold a special meeting with the homeowners on Mitchell Lake. Lambert said that he had met with the Board of Timber Lakes Homeowners Association and the board asked that if it could transfer the scenic easement to the City, would the City take it and then would the City take the responsibility to enforce the easement. Lambert suggested that a Surface Management Ordinance be brought up at the meeting. Bentley questioned why not just the homeowners' associations Lambert replied that he believed it was important to notify all the property owners. Anderson asked who represents all the citizens of the State as the water is public property. Lambert replied that the lakeshore was what was being discussed and the lakeshore does not belong to all the citizens of the State. Anderson asked if the City was talking about backing off the original agreements. He said that what the City had asked for was not what you see today. c City Council Minutes 23 August 9, 1988 Bentley said that he saw the problem as being specific to one area; if the Homeowners' Association came to the Council and said it would not manage the scenic easement, then it would be the Council's issue. He believed that surface management needs should be dealt with separately, as it was a significant policy issue. Lambert replied that Weston Bay residents have broken the scenic easements. He said that other developers are wanting to develop and the policy should be set. Harris questioned the City's legal rights. Pauly replied that the distinction was the original restrictions placed on the original development. The City was not a party to the development of these restrictions and had no basis to enforce those restriction; however, the Weston Bay area came under a conservation easement and could be enforced by the City. Harris believed that the Council needed to get together with the Timber Lakes Board and determine if it would enforce the scenic easement, and then the Council would have the option to take over the responsibility. Pauly stated that for Timber Lakes to transfer the scenic easement to the City, it might require consent from all the property homeowners to turn over their rights. Lambert replied that Timber Lakes had checked into this and that the requirement was 90% and the residents would be informed that if they did not vote it would be considered a "yes" vote. Anderson asked if one or two individuals in the Homeowners Association did not comply with the restrictions could the other members of the Association come to the City for help. He commented that the City was a party to the creation of the Association. Pauly disagreed. The property owners knew what the restrictions were when they purchased their property. Anderson commented that in 1947 there were 49 public accesses on Lake Minnetonka and that today mcte are only 9 and he believed that the public was loosing control of the lakes. Bentley did not believe that a meeting with all the property owners would be productive or a good way for the City to make policy. He believed that the Council should deal with representatives of the Homeowners Association. Lambert said then that it was the Council's suggestion to only meet with the Timber Lakes Homeowners Association. Bentley said that the City had a specific problem and would like the discussion kept to this. Harris asked if there was any urgency to this issue. Jullie replied that the matter needed to be cleared up. City Council Minutes 24 August 9, 1988 MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock that the Council would meet with representatives from the Homeowners Association on Mitchell Lake, with the date to be set later. Motion carried unanimously. Anderson was concerned about the need for a surface management ordinance. After a lengthy discussion of how this could be dealt with Bentley suggested that Lambert have suggestions at the next Council meeting. 5. k3ecQJfF1€Tina 1QR_2f_Slp_e__Qt_EaL1S5__sue_.&tb eti.(%_F.i_g1.0 Lambert reported that this was an information item only. He stated the need to find money to irrigate Franlo Park this year so that it would be useable by next year. Lambert estimated the costs to be approximately $30 to $35 thousand dollars. Anderson asked if the money would come from park fees. Lambert replied no. Bentley believed that Staff needed to get specific prices and determine how the money would be derived. He said that the Council would just be recommending Lambert to continue with the process. Bentley asked Lambert to come back with bids and how this would be paid for. Anderson questioned if it was not to late to seed this year. Lambert replied that the fields were being seeded now. Lambert commented that this field would be quite valuable if the City could get water to it. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve Staff recommendations for a well and irrigation system for Franlo Park. Motion carried unanimously. Bentley expressed a desire to begin the process to have a referendum held to authorize the issuance of a bond for park and recreation improvemeulo.;. F'. Report ,o€_Director_of Public W9rkS. G. Report of Finance _gi_rgct9L )11 • City Council Minutes 25 August 9, 1988 Xl. NEW BUSINESS Harris commented that she would like to have a special meeting to discuss the R1-9.5 issue and suggested to schedule the meeting for the first part of October. XII. APJQURNPJENI Meeting adjourned at 12:50 AM. • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST September 20, 1988 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) PLUMBING Du-All Service, Inc. Ivan C. Lanars Steenberg-Henkel Construction Bill Londer Plumbing Co., Inc. R. C. Plumbing & Heating CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY) HEATING & VENTILATING A Plus Construction, Inc. Gary Hoehn Builders Gusk Heating & Air Conditioning R. A. Neises Construction Lindemeier Service Plekkenpol Builders, Inc. Plumline Construction, Inc. Stordahl Construction GAS FITTER Thrifty Remodeling Nieman Plumbing These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licen ed activity. Oaf- Pat Solie Licensing j. ORDINANCE NO. a2-88 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 9.40, RULES RELATING TO FIREARMS REGULATIONS, BY AMENDING PRESENT SECTION 9.40 Subd. 3.A. TO RESTRICT THE AREAS WHERE DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS ARE PERMITTED. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Chapter 9, shall be amended by amending Section 9.40, Subd. 3.A. to read as follows: A. Areas Where Permitted. A permit may be granted to discharge firearms or dangerous weapons only as follows: (1) In that part of the City lying, South of Riverview Road (existing and abandoned sections); South of Highway 169 west from its intersection with Riverview Road; and south of County Road 1 west of Highway 169 and (2) in other areas of the City, at the discretion of the Police Department, to a person having an ownership interest in real property. A permit issued under this clause may be used by said person and guests, subject, however, to the condition that guests must hold valid permits and must at all times be accompanied by and in the presence of the property owner. Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 9.99 are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of 1988, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of said City on the day of 1988. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1988. 11 • ORDINANCE 39-88 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 2, SEC. 2.15, SUBD. 2 BY ADDING D. TO INCLUDE A MUNICIPAL CEMETERY UNDER THE DUTIES OF THE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION; AMENDING SEC. 2.30, SUBD. 5 TO INCLUDE A MUNICIPAL CEMETERY UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT; AND ADDING SEC. 2.19 GOVERNING THE MUNICIPAL CEMETERY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Eden Prairie City Code Section 2.15, Subd. 2, is hereby amended by adding D. to read as follows: D. The acquisition, development and maintenance of municipal cemetery in the City, including: 1. Review of the existing cemetery records and advise the Council of the status of records and grounds. 2. Recommendation of policies to the Council on matters pertaining to the operation of the cemetery. 3. Recommendation of an annual budget for the operation and upkeep of the cemetery. 4. Recommendation for the use of the Perpetual Cemetery Fund. Section 2. Eden Prairie City Code Section 2.30, Subd. 5, is hereby amended to read as follows: Subd. 5. Community Services Department. A Community Services Department is hereby established. The Head of this Department is the Director of Community Services. All parks, recreation, Civic Center, senior citizen, historical and cultural activities, diseased tree program, and municipal cemetery shall be under the jurisdiction of this Department. Section 3. Eden Prairie City Code Chapter 2 is hereby amended by adding Sec. 2.19 to read as follows: Sec. 2.19 MUNICIPAL CEMETERY 1 ,.),A 3 Subd. 1. Name and location. The municipal cemetery, known as the Pleasant Hill Cemetery is situated upon land within the City limits. Subd. 2. Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 306 Adopted by Reference. Except as otherwise provided for in this Code, the regulatory and procedural provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 306, (1986) , with regard to public cemeteries, is hereby incorporated herein and adopted by reference in its entirety. Subd. 3. Maintenance and Operation. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission shall advise the Council on all matters pertaining to the development and mainte- nance of the cemetery, including operation of the cemetery, status of records, upkeep of the grounds, annual budget for oper- ation and upkeep thereof, and use of the cemetery perpetual care fund. The Council may adopt by resolution certain written rules and regulations pertaining to the cemetery. Subd. 4. Rules and Regulations Governing Municipal Cemetery. it shall be unlawful for any person to: A. Drive a motor vehicle into the cemetery, unless attending a funeral, visiting a relative's or friend's grave site, or carrying on maintenance work authorized by the City; B. Drive or park any motor vehicle across or upon any grave or lot; C. Drive any motor vehicle in excess of ten miles- per-hour within the cemetery grounds; D. Engage in loud or boisterous talking or playing of music; E. Bring food or refreshments into the cemetery or consume them on the grounds; F. Allow dogs or other pets on the cemetery grounds, with the exception of seeing eye dogs; 2 J�� • G. Engage in peddling or soliciting the sale of any commodity within the cemetery grounds; H. Place signs, notices, or advertisements of any kind within the cemetery grounds; I. Bring firearms into the cemetery except by military escort accompanying a veteran's funeral or attending memorial services, or by police officers while in the line of duty. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provision and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty Violation" and Section 2.99 are hereby adopted by refer- ence, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , 1988, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meet- ing of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1988. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of 1988. LMD4/ap:1600.0 I 3 aU�)� TO: Mayor and Council FROM: John Frane, City Clerk DATE: September 8, 1988 RE: Request for city approval for Charitable Gambling The Hockey Association of Eden Prairie is requesting the Citv's approval for Charitable Gambling to be conducted at Greenstreots Restaurant. The association is a non-profit corporation registered with the State. A list of officers and their request is attached. We did not include their attachments 1, 3, and 4. I E Hockey Association Prairie Co ofm Eden Prairie clo Eden Prairie Community Center 16700 Valley View Road r =Inn Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 gran' haep City of Eden Prairie John Frane, Finance Director September 8, 1988 Dear Mr. Frane, The Hockey Association of Eden Prairie is requesting your acceptance of our obtaining a gambling license from the State of Minnesota. Hockey costs are more per Eden Prairie child than any of the other sports. With the rapid growth of Eden Prairie, there are more and more Eden Prairie children who need additional and special financial help to be a part of hockey in Eden Prairie. The monies collected thru our gambling permit will be used to help these less fortunate children. Any monies not used for this specific purpose will be escrowed and be used to build an additional sheet of ice in the city of Eden Prairie. Attachment #1 is our gambling license application to the State of Minnesota. Per Mr. Bushard's conversation with Mr. Frane, questions 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 39 will be completed after your acceptance of our application. For your inspection, attachment #2, is a list of our directors for 1988 - 1989. Attachment #3 is our form 990, which is .required by the IRS. Our final attachment (#4) is our Articles of Incorporation with the state's stamp of approval. We have supported the children of Eden Prairie since our conception in May of 1974. In order to better serve these children, we ask and need, your approval of this request. We will seriously and conscientiously abide by the laws pertaining to gambling in Minnesota. Any questions relating to this letter or its attachments can be directed to myself or Tom Bushard (944-2533). Sincerely, Bob Mizell encl. Attachment #2 HOCKEY ASSOCATION OF EDEN PRAIRIE 1988-1989 BOARD OF DIRECTORS STEVE BOOTS JOHN LILLICRAP 11909 Pendleton Court 8579 Darnel Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Eden Prairie, MN 55347 944-1123 - H 941-3943 - H 529-2440 - W 941-3236 - W TOM BUSHARD TOM MEYER 8750 Darnel Road 13695 Theresa Place Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 944-2533 - H 934-5813 - H 379-8131 - W 822-4272 - W DAVE DUBE BOB MIZELL 9645 Squire Lane 11441 Kensington Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Eden Prairie, MN 55347 944-3709 - H 944-6924 - H 835-3133 - W 937-7377 - W PAT FIEDLER MYRON OSTBY 15461 East Sunrise Circle 7140 Quail Circle Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 937-8841 - H 934-5645 - H 475-6689 - W 291-1355 - W RON GIRARD LYNN SEPPMAN 14075 Forest Hills Road 7276 Hunters Run Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 937-9628 - H 937-8412 - H 942-8188 - W TOM KRMPOTICH DAVE SUNDEEN 10456 Devonshire P.O. Box 27488 Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Golden Valley, MN 55427 829-0704 - H 553-9693 - H 854-1700 - W 540-2330 - W f CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION MO. 88-195 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF FAIRFIELD WHEREAS, the plat of FAIRFIELD has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for FAIRFIELD is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated SEPTEMBER 15, 1988. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on SEPTEMBER 20, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk { CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Alan D. Gray, City Engineer FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician DATE: September 15, 1988 SUBJECT: Fairfield PROPOSAL: Tandem Properties has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Fairfield, a single family residential subdivision located west of Eden Prairie Road and south of the Chicago and Northwestern Railway in the North half of Section 20. The plat contains 30 acres to be divided into 68 lots, three outlots and right-of-way dedication for street purposes. Outlots A, B and C contain 0.72, 1.07 and 1.86 acres respectively. Ownership of these outlots will be transfered to the City of Eden Prairie. Outlots A and B will be conveyed to the Eden Prairie cemetary and Outlot C is floodplain and will be used for conservation purposes. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council July 19, 1988, per Resolution 88-137. Second reading of Ordinance 29-68, changing zoning from Rural to PUD-8- 88-R1-13.5 and PUD-8-88-R1-9.5, was finally read and approved at the City Council meeting held August 16, 1988. The Developer's Agreement referred to in this report was executed August 16, 1988. VARIANCES: All variances not previously granted through the zoning district change must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities, roadways and walkways will be installed throughout the plat in conformance with City Standards and the requirements of the Developer's Agreement. PARK DEDICATION: Prior to release of the final plat, the Developer's shall convey to the City by warranty deed Outlot C. All other requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. Page 2 of 2 FAIRFIELD September 15, 1988 BONDING: Bonding must conform to City Code and the Developer's Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Fairfield subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: 1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $2,695.00. 2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $12,744.DD. 3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $2,760.00. 4. Receipt of warranty deeds for Outlots A, B and C. 5. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. JJ:ss cc: Tandem Properties Centex Homes Sathre Bergquist, Inc. • a1u1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-196 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF TECHNOLOGY PARK 6TH ADDITOIN WHEREAS, the plat of TECHNOLOGY PARK 6TH ADDITION has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for TECHNOLOGY PARK 6TH ADDITION is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated SEPTEMBER 13, 1988. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of { this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADDPTED by the City Council on SEPTEMBER 20, 1988. Gary O. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 1Jo CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Alan D. Gray, City Engineer FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician DATE: September 13, 1988 SUBJECT: Technology Park 6th Addition PROPOSAL: The Developers, Technology Park Associates, have requested City Council approval of the final plat of Technology Park 6th Addition. Located along Golden Triangle Drive south of West 74th Street, the plat contains 13.56 acres to be divided into one lot, one outlot, and right- of-way dedication for the extension of Golden Triangle Drive. Outlot A contains 4.14 acres and will be retained by the Developers for future development. This proposal is a combination of Norseman Indistrial Park 3rd and 5th Additions and additional land to create a larger building envelope for the planned expansion of the existing Bachman's Dept. 56 Warehouse Building. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council August 16, 1988, per Resolution 88-178. Second reading of ordinance #37-88, changing zoning from Rural to 1-2, is scheduled for final approval Septembert 20, 198B. TheDeveloper's Agreement referred to within this report is scheduled for execution September 20, 1988. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities, roadways, and walkways will be installed in conformance with City Code and the Developer's Agreement. The last segment of Golden Triangle Drive will be constructed in connection with this proposal under a City improvement contract. Prior to release of the final plat, the Developers shall enter into a special assessment agreement defining Developer's portion of construction costs associated with the improvement of Golden Triangle Drive. �Iv3 Page 2 of 2 TECHNOLOGY PARK 6TH ADDITION September 13, 1988 PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. BONDING: Bonding must conform to City Code and the Developer's Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Technology Park 6th Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement, and the following: 1. Receipt of street lighting fee of $702.00. 2. Receipt of engineering fee of $1,356.00. 3. Execution of special assessment agreement. 4. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. JJ:ss cc: a iou CII\NGL ORDI'.R (Instructions on reverse side) No. 1 PROJECT: Old Shady Oak Road and DATE OF ISSUANCE: July 19, 1988 Rowland Road OWNER: (Name, City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Dr. Address) Eden Prairie, MN 55344 CONTRACTOR: OWNER's Project No. I.C. 52-119 Richard Knutson, Inc. 12585 Rhode Island Ave. So. ENGINEER: Rieke Carroll Muller Assoc., Inc. Savage, MN 55378 10901 Red Circle Dr. CONTRACT FOR: Minnetonka, MN 55343 Sanitary Sewer and Watermain 871009 Improvements ENGINEER's Project No. You are directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents. Description: See attached description of changes. Purpose of Change Order: Change in contract price. Attachments:0.*Admommattscxosatogxkomx) Description and explanation of Change Order No. 1. CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME: Original Contract Price pn final Contra t Time Substantial Completion - Oct. 1, 1987 S 143,237.35 Final Completion - Nov. 1, 1987 Jaye or dale Previous Change Orders No. 0 to No. 0 Net change from previous Change Orders •S _ 0 my, Contract Price prior to this Change Order Co tract Time pri to this Cbange Order Substantial ulompletion - Oct. 1, 1987 S 143,237.35 Final Completion - Nov. 1, 1987 days a sate Net Increase t `i:MA2'(of this('hinge Order Net Increase(decrease)of this Change Order 508.00 0 Contract Price ssith all approved Change Orders Contract Time with all approved Change Orders 143,745.35 Substantial Completion - Oct. 1, 1987 Final Completion - Nov_ 1, 1487 dap or date RECOMMENDED: APPROVED: APPROVED: t='G ! by o.�rr by Contractor FJCDC No.19I0-8.B(1983 Edition) ReraicJ Fr the Enr!nccr, J...nt Contract D..um.nt,(or n:1,iec et.J enJor,cJ h,The A..ewhtteJ Central Contractor,of Amenca. I(h CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES: A. Furnish and install hydrant and gate valve extensions to the hydrant and gate valve near the air relief manhole on Rowland Road Section"A"of the project. Unit Item Description Unit Ouantitv Price Amount Hydrant Extension & LS I $500.00 $500.00 Gate Valve Extension Addition Section "A" $500.00 B. Delete the following items from the Old Shady Oak Road Section "B"of the project. Unit Item Description illait Quantity price Amount Aggregate Bedding CY 4800.0 $5.55 $26,640.00 8"x 6" Wyes EA 4 $200.00 800.00 6"Service Pipe LF 60 $16.00 960.00 8 mil "Tube"Type Film Wrap LF 1075 $1.00 $1,075.00 Deletions Section "B" $29,475.00 C. Furnish and install the sanitary sewer, service pipes,service wyes, drop manhole as per the revised sheet 2. Section "B" of the project, dated August II, 1987. Furnish and install granular bedding material meeting MNDOT 3I49F requirements from adjacent property. Furnish and install 15" RCP culvert with riprap under sewer and watermain. Furnish and install 12" PVC culverts under driveways. Unit Item Description Unit Ouantitv p_r±oo Am un 8"Sanitary Sewer I2'-14' LF 19 $18.25 $346.75 8"Sanitary Sewer 14'-16' LF 61 $20.10 1,226.10 8"Sanitary Sewer 16'-18' LF 48 $22.00 1,056.00 8"Sanitary Sewer 18'-20' LF 43 $24.50 1,053.50 8"Sanitary Sewer 20'-22' LF 46 $26.90 1,237.40 Connect to Existing 8" Sanitary EA 1 $2,560.00 2,560.00 8" Drop Manhole Assembly EA 1 $1,150.00 1,150.00 8"x4" Service Wyes EA 6 $175.00 1,050.00 4"Service Pipe LF 110 $15.00 1,650.00 Aggregate Bedding CY 3170 $5.00 15,850.00 15"RCP Culvert w/CL II Riprap Worksheets 3524 and 2878 LS 1 $1,216.00 1,216.00 12"PVC Driveway Culverts Worksheets 3525 EA 2 $543.625 $1.087.25 Additions Section "B" $29,483.00 9,IOCP • Summary: Section "A" Total Additions $500.00 Section "B" Total Additions $29,483.00 Total Deletions $(29.475.QQ1 Net Addition $8.00 Net Addition/Deletions: Total Addition Section"A" $500.00 Total Addition Section "B" 8.00 Net Addition to Contract from Change Order No. I $508.00 EXPLANATION: A. Hydrant and gate valve extensions were required due to the depth of the watermain below the existing ground line. The watermain depth is so located to accommodate future re-grading of Rowland Road, (5.5 ft below existing grade). See attached Richard Knutson letter of September 22, 1987 and RCM's October 5, 1987 letter. B. Cost of aggregate bedding changed from 5.55 cy to $5.0 cy. 8" x 6" wyes and 6" service pipe were deleted and 8" x 4" wyes and 4" service pipe were provided. (See attached letters). 8 mil tube type film wrap was deleted and was included as part of the cost to furnish the standard joint with tie rod restraining system, as per RCM letter of August 28, 1987 and October 5, 1987. C. Sanitary sewer realignment and drop manhole were due to property owner's request to locate sewer line outside future house pad. (See attached letters). Wyes and service pipe sizes were reduced to reflect City's standards for this type of improvement. Cost of aggregate bedding was changed to reflect locally available material,(see attached letters). 15" RCP culvert w/CL II riprap was installed under sewer and watcrmain in the vicinity of MH 03 to allow for drainage of the area west of Old Shady Oak Road. Two 12" PVC culverts were installed under driveways as requested by Owner. • • • • A101 - MEMORANDUM - TD: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members FROM: Alan d. Gray, P.E. City Engineer DATE: September 15, 1988 RE: Trunk Storm Sewer Facilities for Fairfield and Cheyenne Place The proposed residential subdivisions of Fairfield and Cheyenne Place in southwest Eden Prairie are currently proceeding through the subdivision review process. The storm drainage facilities for both subdivisions, as well as other adjacent properties in southwestern Eden Prairie, will drain to an existing wetland area west of the old City Hall site on CSAH 4. The "Southwestern Eden Prairie Development Phasing Study" has identified the need for an outfall storm sewer connecting the wetland area with Red Rock Lake as part of the overall storm drainage system. The system segment proposed for study is identified on the attached Figure 10. Since this facility will provide benefit to a multiple number of properties and require easements over several privately owned properties easterly of CSAH 4 it should be planned and constructed as a City Improvement Contract. The Engineering Division recommends that the Council authorize the preparation of a Feasibility Study so that the segment of this facility westerly of CSAH 4 may be coordinated with the design of utilities in the Fairfield First Addition. Since this project will proceed based on Council motion rather than on Council action based on a petition from 35% of properties abutting the proposed facility it will require that future Council actions to implement the project receive a minimum of four affirmative Council votes. ADG:ss ;(G r C\ i a 0 0 IL t____ StATE 3I ..WJL-MO. 5_.,‘-c_ii_:;.__._.------_:__7__ji // _R_____.-- �.• M/rcrrEcc 3 / �� rrrnff4 LAKE - //\'� SCENICV. �( _ LI ttprf� 3g. A r ti NTs ROAa:,, =a_ ,,,) LC •,•III Lltt I045 i' L• NWL 86B .E •, `� MARSH �'. '/ J I_ LAKE / /JO,{/-��' 1 ___.. `- �� ,tefr I� 1.., HwL 99' q'• R', �O_ je, ,0 AF /\ ", HWL 870 NW B7 �(,� \ \ HWL.874 RED \t _ // AAF J \ : CNn,4 / ♦ NWL B83 I \ ihffq nl :Lc, 9� Nwl B6. ROCK \\ 1. �.,.`V.iI 1CY.17/GA 1 2,, • IBAF CIITCk ° 15. `_ LAKE 14 �/ FV VA 38AF '�.+� C 5AF NWL 883 '+' p NWl B79 ♦ NWI BAA •'5.9 W I� NWL BBO % • Y f� / illa O. 1 t1 ,7AF �L1 et A. T,,1 Pk.; ( \.-''. ...,„....9/, *F NWL 855 0'• PIONEER y NWL 660 LAKE W. RILEY [..c_____ �.• • �••• � \ • ``NWL 980 I, 13"� OWL 839 ♦t NWL 900 • •.j:.lw...:..._....t ..J"`-'w / 6 NWL 903 /I /1 15AF IA p O ,. / �J L/ , • NWL BOB 0,1 O J ,DAF , NWL B1. •f, \� ( �\ Ir. fl Iq `ttt. `\1 \ ,I \ PO ♦0 C1f illy a* KEY I /�� CI POND .... fl...1 ."f`F may/ 884814j..... PE ,,,,....Prf... ttt,................ ..fl�� STORAGE MINNL 5014 J I, ' • r NWL NORMAL \ WATER LEVEL 7/.4 \ NWL HIGH - i I WATER LEVEL U S. Jr-- \ F.M.FORCEMAIN NWY trio. 78��— DRAINAGE SYSTEM I THE BRAUER GROUP,INC, FIGURE l O BENSHOOF A ASSOC.,INC. SOUTHWESTERN EDEN PRAIRIE HANSEN THORP PELLINEN DEVELOPMENT PHASING STUDY ` OLSON.INC CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-197 RESOLUTION ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT WHEREAS, it is proposed to make the following improvements: I.C. 52-152 (Storm sewer facilities between Red Rock Lake and the proposed Fairfield and Cheyenne Place Additions and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements, pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Chapter 429. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study with the assistance of HTPO, and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and presented to the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment and feasibility of the proposed improvements. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 20, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk 9,00 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-199 RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a report has been given by the City Engineer, through HTPO to the City Council recommending the following improvements to wit: I.C. 52-147 (Watermain extension on Eden Prairie Road, CSAH 1) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: 1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of property abutting or within said boundaries for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to M.S.A. Section 429.01I to 429.111, at an estimated total cost of the improvements as shown. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on October 4, 1988 at 7:30 P.M. at the Eden Prairie City Hall, 7600 Executive Road. The City Clerk shall give published and mailed notice of such hearing on the improvements as required by law. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 20, 1988 Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • • LaVonne Industrial Park IV CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 36-88-PUD-10-88 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING OISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 10-88- I-2 District (hereinafter "PUD 10-88-I-2"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of September 20, 1988, entered into between LaVonne Industrial Park Partnership IV and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD 10-88-I-2, and is hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD 10-88-I-2 is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD 10-88-I-2 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code, that are contained in PUD 10-B8-I-2, are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD 10-88-I-2 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is, removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 10-88-I-2 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 16th day of August, 1988, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 20th day of September, 1988. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary 0. Peterson, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of A113 Ji LaVonne Industrial Park Building IV P.U.D. Concept Amendment and P.U.D. District Review Lots 1-4, Block 1; Lots 1-3, Block 2; Lot 1, Block 3; Outlots A-C; LaVonne Industrial Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, also, Tract D, R.L.S. #1095, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 The North 44.77 feet of the South 250.00 feet of Outlot C, LaVonne Industrial Park, according to the recorded plat thereof. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 The South 205.23 feet of Outlot C, LaVonne Industrial Park, according to the recorded plat thereof. Guide Plan Change & Zoning District Amendment That part of Lot 4, Block 1, LaVonne Industrial Park, according to the recorded plat thereof which lies North of the South 250.00 feet thereof. That part of Outlot C, LaVonne Industrial Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, which lies north of the South 205.23 feet thereof. All of Tract D, Registered Land Survey No. 1095, files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, Minnesota. Preliminary Plat Lot 4, Block I, and Outlot C, LaVonne'Industrial park, according to the recorded plat thereof. Also, Tract D, R.L.S. #1095, Hennepin County, Minnesota. LaVonne Industrial Park Building IV DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1988, by LaVonne Industrial Park Partnership IV, a Minnesota partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Industrial on 4.64 acre, Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on approximately 33 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on approximately 33 acres, with waivers, and Zoning District Amendment within the I-2 District on 4.64 acres and from Rural to I-2 on D.25 acre and from Rural to R1-13.5 on 0.89 acre, and Preliminary Plat of 7.66 acres into one lot and one outlot, all said 33 acres situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #36-88-PUD- 10-88, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: 1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the materials revised and dated August 5, 1988, reviewed and approved by the City Council on August 16, 1988, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein. 2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2116 3. Concurrent with, and as part of the final plat for the property, Developer agrees to provide to the City a drainage and utility easement over the south 250 feet and over that portion of the east 75 feet of proposed Lot 1, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Developer also agrees to provide for a written scenic easement over the same portion of the property described above, said scenic easement to be in the form as provided in Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Further, Developer agrees to record said easement on the property at Hennepin County, and to provide proof of filing of said easement to the City, prior to issuance of any building permit on the property. 4. Concurrent with, and as part of the final plat for the property, Developer agrees to petition for vacation of the utility and drainage easements considered by the City Engineer to be unnecessary due to the revised lot lines within said final plat, all as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. 5. Concurrent with, and as part of the final plat for the property, Developer agrees to provide for a 20 ft. wide trail easement on the property in the location as depicted in Exhibit E, attached hereto, and made a part hereof. 6. Prior to release of the final plat for the property, Developer agrees to submit to the City Engineer, and to obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, and erosion control for the property. Said plans shall include details for construction of the terminus for the cul-de-sac extension of Canterbury Lane and for extension of sanitary sewer to serve the end of Cantebury Lane through the industrial portion of the parcel from Edenvale Boulevard, all as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer agrees to construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordant• with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 7. Prior to issuance of any building permit for the property, Developer agrees to submit to the Building Department, and to obtain the Building Department's approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls indicated on the grading plan in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said plans shall include details with respect to the height, type of materials, and method of construction to be used for said retaining walls. Upon approval by the Building Department, Developer agrees to construct said retaining wall improvements as stated above, as approved by the Building Department, concurrent with the building construction on the property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. C.' • 8. Prior to issuance of any permit for grading or building on the property, Developer agrees to file the final plat for the property with Hennepin County, thereby recording all necessary easements on the property. Concurrently, City agrees to file the vacation of right-of-way from Edenvale Boulevard to the property. 9. Prior to any issuance of any grading permit on the property, Developer agrees to submit to the Chief Building Official and obtain the Chief Building Official's approval of plans for demolition and/or removal of existing structures, and septic systems on the property. Prior to demolition or removal, Developer shall provide to the City a certified check in the amount of $1,000.00 to guarantee the restoration of the property to grade. City agrees to return said certified check to Developer after the demolition or removal on the property is completed and after it is verified by City that the structures, and/or septic systems have been properly removed or demolished, and that the property has been restored to grade. 10. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property, Developer agrees to submit to the Director of Planning, and to obtain the Director's approval of a revised landscape plan which depicts the following: A. Shade trees to be located in the planting islands on the property, instead of evergreens, with relocation of the evergrees to the rear of the site, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. B. Additional evergreens to screen the property from the residential lot along the east side of the property, in addition to the approved screening fence in that location as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. C. Extension of the screening fence along the north property line of Outlot A, in conjunction with the proposed evergreen plantings, all as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer agrees to implement, or cause to be implemented, those plans listed above, as approved by the Director of Planning, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 11. Developer agrees to notify the City and the Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of any grading, or tree removal, on the property. 12. Developer has submitted to the City, and obtained the City's approval of a tree inventory of those trees within 25 ft. outside of the construction area, which are not planned to be removed by construction on the property as approved by City, indicating the fl\ 1 size, type, and location of all trees twelve (12) inches in diameter, or greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground level. If any such trees are removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction area, Developer agrees that prior to issuance of any building permit for the property, Developer shall: A. Submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of a reforestation plan for all trees removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction area. Said plan shall indicate that the trees shall be replaced by similar tree species and that the trees used for reforestation shall be no less than six inches in diameter. The amount of trees to be replaced shall be determined by the Director of Planning, using a square inch per square inch basis, according to the area of the circle created by a cross sectional cut through the diameter of a tree as measured 4.5 feet above the ground. B. Prepare and submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of a written estimate of the costs of the reforestation work to be completed. C. Submit a bond, or letter of credit, guaranteeing completion of all reforestation work as approved by the Director of Planning. Developer agrees that the amount of the bond, or letter of credit, shall be 150% of the approved estimated cost of implementation of all reforestation work and shall be in such form and contain such other provisions and terms as may be required by the Director of Planning. Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the Director of Planning. 13. Developer agrees to implement erosion control measures and adequate protective measures for areas to be preserved and areas where grading is not to occur, and to receive City approval of said measures. Developer agrees that said protective measures shall include, but not be limited to, the following: A. Grading shall be confined to that area of the property within the construction limits. B. Snow fencing shall be placed at the construction limits within the wooded areas of the property prior to any grading upon the property. C. City shall perform an on-site inspection of said protective measures on the property by the City. Developer shall contact City for said inspection. Developer agrees that defects in materials and workmanship in the implementation of said measures shall then be determined by the City. 2►ri 4 D. Defects in materials or workmanship, if any, shall be corrected by Developer. Developer agrees to call City for it reinspection of the implementation measures, and to receive approval by the City prior to issuance of the grading permit by the City. Approval of materials and workmanship may be subject to such conditions as the City may impose at the time of acceptance. 14. Prior to issuance of any building permit on the property, Developer agrees to submit to the Director of Planning, and to obtain the Director's approval of: A. Color samples of the exterior building materials to be implemented on the property. Said colors shall blend into the natural surroundings to minimize the impact of the structure on the property. B. Detailed site lighting information which limits all lighting to a maximum of 20 ft. high, downcast, cut-off luminars. There shall be no wall-pack lighting allowed on the exterior portions of the structures. Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer agrees to implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements listed above, as approved by the Director of Planning, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 15. Concurrent with building construction of the industrial buildings on the property, Developer agrees to construct the two-tiered retaining wall, and implement all landscaping and fencing plans, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, or as described above, for purposes of providing the screening buffer to the adjacent residential lots. Developer acknowledges that City will grant no occupancy permits for the industrial structures on the property until such time as the landscaping and fencing is in place on the property. 16. Prior to development of any of the residential portion of the property, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, Developer agrees to return to the Planning Commission for review and to the City Council for action with detailed plans for construction and development of said residential portion of the property. Said detailed plans shall include, but not be limited to, at least the following: site plan, architectural plans, landscaping details, access details, and any other plans as may be considered necessary by the City for adequate review of said residential development. 17. Developer acknowledges that all maintenance of the screening fence shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. a l lc) EXHIBIT E / ii v.z. ....-•:....r.r -------_, . -,—.:;..Qs•V: .....'' ,.:-,•f•• (. 441,4s.s.L.,,,, 1...-1 —vi7,,,,,,---'. ..,z!,,,•/ill / I . : .'.. .."*:,..t ''..# 1-i:: a'..:!.:„1.,,,e.....-...„ / - /..::.-:-›-•••,.. . . . . :);::/•; r -><..----- •,...,. i:,,,_,,,..7_,__.,---- .....„ :,,,,.:: I.,. ft- ' • .- ....., • / 4 i' /‘,. ' ,/% / -:,.:; c-.---- 4 i ,,, 1 A.• e•• . ,•1, I A 1,4" Co il A •, ! ' Y:: :1:: i 1 ''• it i /1 ' A,te: ' 1 A'A •' '', 'i''''''' ' 4:** .:.:'...; /. ,./..%.e.'C.,''.'•• L 0 IV:// •',,i'•:::.41 , ,,, .,,,,.. . I.. /.// ,:,' ..:•::,, ,- :,',".,---- - i --1 ...'-----1 /',r;;%.,'" • ,,,,',,•'':,;;T:', .• i .\--.., ,•'-f-- ? ,i. ,z. 2_ '' ,,..,-.::.:::Q,..;:, . : . ••.:.,,./,e: l• . ''' __.--. y:, ,----7-7,-_- -,"4. ' , • ; iV-: ;---;"''''',:i- f ,;' .,- / I i y /--,• (7—/ ,. ;r; ):':, V3:•"."%-:t. %, %,'‘, ''', ,,/./Ampprvppoa, ...%moo., ' , 4.. ; (42, 1 -.`2,,...-:.'l.'';‘. :--•,.% - -,,:.\_.',,', ',.. , i/4:‘,..n„,c- . ,!' 'I 'C. ''4*, 14%4 8/r. / '', . ,_/;;,•' . a /, ,/ ', \ s„,—...a—. '.1-.,:::/. .. 4,„bi'‘, '-`; ',, •:•,.. . 'Ca.„-„_ -_%:.-- ''.'44' "-L1 / , / `' ita. •f-• . 0 I .. -'-K,4-L7..r; N , • ., • i . ,i `• / ' / .' ,--". 1` ,..: " ,,• ,. ....,,..::,:,,, \ 4.- k .", OUTL4' \:': : :''‘i ,'/'.- -1:r- — - • , •.•,) ,. ,;,,, A., 11%, ; :', ;;;,,•;,,,.:' ,./,--, -':-' \ \s's' j ,: :r..!;:, \ '.. 4 \ , . s., „„ „ mip..AL. ,. .. . . „ ENTIFE SuFFEI ,. - ..- ..- Z-oNe 4 c.atole._ FOREST 451..;;TON TO SEVE...NS F:E!',3HTS. r5E1`1EN.Pr I I: I \......{ZO' IgAit i , F , I I1.•- EA• EtlEkrr • .,•. alao .,.1 • LaVonne Industrial Park IV CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-204 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE 36-88-PUD-10-88 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 36-88-PUD-10-88 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 20th day of September, 1988; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 36-88-PUD-10-88, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 36-88-PUD-10-8B shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on September 20, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • ?lal LaVonne Industrial Park IV CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 36-88-PUD-10-88 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land within the I-2 District and from the Rural District to the I-2 District and from the Rural District to the R1-13.5 District, all said land located south of Edenvale 8oulevard and north of Cantebury Lane, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the _ day of 1988. (A full copy of the text of this Drdinance is available from the City Clerk.) Technology Park 6th Bachmans' Department 56 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 37-88 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the RuralDistrict and be placed in the I-2 District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the 1-2 Di d to in strict, Subdivision on1,s oSubparagraph B, shallt be, andf are f land in each Disrict eamended accordingly. 4. Cod 1, entitled " visions and ion DefinitionstApplicable to�the EntireCh City rCode Including Penaltyal forPViolation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. conditis of that certain Developer's eAgreement hdated all bas ofe b September ject to h20,er1988,e tms d enteredon ninto between Technology Park Associates, a Minnesota general partnership, which Agreement is hereby made a part hereof. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 16th day of August, 198B, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 20th day of September, 1988. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of 1 • Exhibit A Legal Description Zoning District Amendment Lot 1, Block 1, Norseman Industrial Park 3rd Addition, except the east 250.00 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also, Lot 1, Block 1, Norseman Industrial Park 5th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Zoning District-Change from Rural to I-2 All that part of the North Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 116 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying West of Norseman Industrial Park 5th Addition lying South of the South line of 74th Street and lying West of the West line of Golden Triangle Drive, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Preliminary Plat All that part of the North Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 116 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying West of Norseman Industrial Park 5th Addition lying South of the South line of 74th Street and lying West of the West line of Golden Triangle Drive; ALSO, That part of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 116, Range 22, lying South of the South line of Valley View Road; ALSO, Lot 1, Bleck 1, Norseman Industrial Park 5th Addition, and Lot 1, Block 1, Norseman Industrial Park 3rd Addition, except the East 250.00 feet thereof, according to the recorded plat thereof, all in Hennepin County, Minnesota. 'lig Li j. Bachman's Department 56 Technology Park 6th Addition DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1988, by Technology Park Associates, a Minnesota general partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Amendment within the I-2 Zoning District for 4.5 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 on 4.3 acres, with variances reviewed by the Board of Appeals, and Preliminary Plat of 24.2 acres into one lot, two outlots, and road right-of-way for construction of 90,606 sq. ft. addition to the existing Bachman's Department 56 building, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #37-88, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: 1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the materials revised and dated August 12, 1988, reviewed and approved by the City Council on August 16, 1988, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein. 2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. i�j • 3. Prior to release by the City of the final plat or issuance of any building permit for the property, Developer agrees to execute a Special Assessment Agreement for improvements to Golden Triangle Drive for purposes of improvement of the street, utilities, and other related appurtenances. 4. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for grading plans, utility connections, drainage, and erosion control for the property. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 5. Developer shall notify the City and the Watershed District 48 hours prior to any grading, tree removal, or tree cutting on the property. 6. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property, Developer agrees to submit to the Director of Planning, and to obtain the Director's approval of the following: A. A revised landscape plan which indicates the use of a fence at the top of the berm located along Golden Triangle Drive. Details of the fence, including types of material(s) to be used, dimensions, method of installation, etc., shall be included in said revised plan. Materials shall be heavy duty, or industrial, in strength, as opposed to typical materials used for residential fencing purposes. 8. Detailed plans indicating the irrigation system to be installed on the property for purposes of insuring the survival of the landscaping to be installed on the property. C. Detailed lighting plans for the property, which provide that all lighting be downcast in design in order to avoid glare off-site. Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer agrees to implement, or cause to be implemented, those plans and improvements listed above, as approved by the Director of Planning, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 7. Concurrent with street and utility construction on the property, Developer agrees to construct a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the east side of Golden Triangle Drive, and to construct an eight-foot wide bituminous trail along the west side of Golden Triangle Drive. Said construction shall be in accordance with City standards and specifications as depicted in Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Technology Park 6th Bachmans' Department 56 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-205 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE 37-88 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY meeting WHEREAS, the COrdinance Council 3of88he was City ofadopted Edenand Prairieordered onpublished 20tha day of regular September, 1988; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 37-88, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 37-88 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on September 20, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • Bachmans' Department 56 ( CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 37-8B AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located south of W. 74th Street, east of Golden Triangle Drive, from the Rural District to the I-2 District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of 1988. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.) • ;�P MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Steve Durham, Zoning Administrator DATE: September 14, 1988 RE: The Daks Business Center Developer's Agreement legally known as Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 1, and Outlot A, Edenwoods Business Center In connection with the sale of the above referenced property a letter from the City of Eden Prairie is requested, confirming all portions of the Oaks Business Center Developer's Agreement have been satisfied or are in the process of being satisfied. A resolution approved by the City Council is the proper format to accomplish this request. The attached resolution indicates that all items of the agreement have been satisfactorily completed. • NIG: .I • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-202 RECORDING CONFORMANCE WITH DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR THE OAKS BUSINESS CENTER DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, on June 4, 1985, Steiner Development, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (Owner) and City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation, entered into a certain Developer's Agreement (Agreement) pertaining to that certain property referred to as The Oaks Business Center and legally described as Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 1 and Outlot A, Edenwoods Business Center; and, WHEREAS, the owner has complied with certain provisions of said Agreement as to the development of the The Oaks Business Center Development; and, WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed the Owner's compliance with said Agreement as to Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 1 and Outlot A, Edenwoods 8usiness Center and has so advised this Council; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Eden Prairie City Council that as to Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 1 and Outlot A, Edenwoods Business Center, the City finds that: All items of the Agreement have been satisfactorily completed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as to all items and lots not mentioned herein. ADOPTED by the City Council on September 20, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor John D. Frane, Clerk SEAL • ( CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-192 CITY CERTIFICATION OF SUBDIVISION INSTRUMENTS WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 272.162 (Chapter 564, Session Laws 1982) authorizes municipalities within the seven-county metropolitan area to review and approve deeds which have the effect of subdividing land and which have been presented to the County Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 272.16; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, as follows: 1. The City Council of the City of Eden Prairie hereby elects to have said Section 272.162 apply to all property within the boundaries of this city; and the City Clerk is hereby directed and authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Hennepin County Auditor. 2. The City Council hereby finds that its subdivision regulations, namely Chapter 12 of the City Code: a) were adopted and filed with the Hennepin County Recorder pursuant to Section 462.36 of Minnesota Statutes, and b) said subdivision regulations have application to all lands within the municipal boundaries of the City. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to appoint from time to time such deputy clerks as may be necessary to review and certify instruments as provided in said Section 272.162; he shall file facsimile signatures of said deputy clerks with the Hennepin County Auditor for the purpose of allowing said auditors to judge the authenticity of any purported city certification under said Section 272.162. 4. Said certification shall be affixed directly to the instrument proposed to be recorded, and shall consist of an indelible stamp setting forth the following information: "City Clerk's Certification Pursuant to M.S. 272.162" The undersigned hereby certifies: (Check one of the following:) 1 I' That City subdivision regulations do not apply to this instrument. That the subdivision of land affected by this instrument has been approved by the governing body of the City of Eden Prairie. That municipal restrictions on the filing and recording of this instrument have been waived by a resolution of the governing body of the City of Eden Prairie. That this instrument does not comply with municipal subdivision restrictions and the affected land and its assessed valuation should not be divided by the County Auditor. Dated: By Deputy Clerk Eden Prairie 5. Instruments filed with the City Clerk or his deputy pursuant to this resolution shall be appropriately certified within 24 hours of their presentment to the City Clerk or his deputy. For purposes of this resolution "24 hours" is defined as one full business day. Passes and adopted by the Council of the City of Eden Prairie this _day of , 19 . Mayor ATTEST • City Clerk 2toZI��� CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-212 A RESOLUTION COMMENDING THE OPTIMIST CLUB OF EDEN PRAIRIE FOR ITS TEN YEARS OF SERVICE TD THE COMMUNITY WHEREAS, the Optimist Club of Eden Prairie formed in September 1978; and WHEREAS, the Optimist Club of Eden Prairie has given much to the Eden Prairie community in its ten years of existence; and WHEREAS, the Optimist Club of Eden Prairie has provided funds and a wide variety of programs primarily for youths and families in the community; and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie gratefully acknowledges the public-spirited efforts of the Optimist Club of Eden Prairie for its investment made in future adults in this commuity; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota that the City Council commend the Optimist Club of Eden Prairie for its ten years of service to the Eden Prairie community and congratulate club members as they celebrate their tenth anniversary on September 24, 1988. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council this 20th day of September, 1988. Mayor Gary D. Peterson ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk ! j Optimist Club OF EDEN PRAIRIE 14180 West 78th Street,Suite 200 Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 (612)9348405 September 2, 1988 Mayor Gary D. Peterson 9400 Creekwood Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Gary, The Optimist Club of Eden Prairie was formed in September 1978 and will be ten years old this month. We will be celebrating our tenth anniversary at a banquet on September 24th. You are probably aware of some of the projects, activities and donations our Club has made over the past ten years which have benefited the Eden Prairie community and, in particular, its youth. The attached list highlights many of our youth programs and activities. In order to recognize our tenth anniversary and our many contributions to Eden Prairie's youth, a proclamation or commendation from you and/or the City Council would certainly be appreciated, and would really add to our anniversary celebration. Thank you very much for your attention to this • request. Sincerely, Donald A. A to President • • • fnUr • OPTIMIST CLUB OF IDOEN PRAIRIE YOUTH OEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION RESPONSE PROGRAMS 6 ACTIVITIES PROVICEO YOUTH APPRECIATION WEEK This is an annual event held in November. Its purpose is to recognize the positive accomplishments made by our youth. High School seniors and CMS 8th Graders are nominated for YAW Representatives by the faculties at the respective schools. Nomination criteria is leadership abilities and involvement in school and community activities. Based on interviews by a panel of Optimists, two representatives from the senior grade at Eden Prairie High School and two from the 8th grade at Central Middle School are selected as the Optimist's Youth Appreciation Week Representatives, and are honored at an awards banquent attended by their parents and school officials. The representatives selected from the High School are awarded scholarships, and the CMS Representatives are awarded reference books. The other nominated students are presented with consolation awards. SCHOOL PATROL TO VALLEY FAIR Each year in May, the Optimists sponsor a day trip to Valley Fair Amusement Park for all Eden Prairie school patrol members. Officers from Public Safety and the school patrol coordinators participate in this event. JUST SAY NO The Optimists have been involved in several "Just Say No" programs directed toward the prevention of drug use by students of all age groups. CUB SCOUT PACKS • The Optimists serve as the sponsoring organization for Cub Scout Pack 422 (Forrest Hill Elementary) and Pack 340 (Eden Lake Elementary). ESSAY CONTEST This is an Optimist International contest open to high school students, who can write an essay on a topic related to "Freedom". Scholarships are awarded to winning essays. ORATORICAL CONTEST This is an Optimist International contest open to middle school students, who can give a speech on a specified topic. Scholarships are awarded to winning speeches. �I�j �' y € TRI-STAR SPORTS. For two years, the Optimists have conducted a Tri-Star Hockey event which allows young skaters to compete on an individual basis by performing three different hockey skills. Trophies are awarded to the top three point-scorers in each age group. All participants receive certificates and patches. The Optimists intend to start a Tri-Star Basketball event this spring. Other sports, such as soccer and football, also have Tri-Star programs available from Optimist International, and we may, in the future, conduct these in Eden Prairie. QIKE SAFETY WEEK. Each Spring, the Optimists offer a bike safety program which is intended to educate young people about bike laws and safe bike riding techniques. HENNEPIN COUNTY HOME SCHOOL CARNIVAL ANO ROOEOFEST. The Eden Priarie Optimists, along with other metropolitan optimist clubs, participate in two events, a carnival and a rodeo, held at the Hennepin County Home School for the students residing there. KAISER ROLL. The Eden Prairie Optimists, along with other metropolitan optimist clubs, participate in the Bloomington MN Kaiser Roll, a marathon race that has wheel chair racer participants. HENNEPIN COUNTY VO-TECH EMERGENCY LOAN FUNS. The Eden Prairie Optimists established an emergency loan fund available to Vo-tech students who need a small loan in an emergency. ARTS CAMP SCHOLARSHIP, This program is still in the study stage. It is the intention of this program to help talented students attend summer camp in an arts field, such as band choir, painting, etc., by paying for part of the tuition cost. r FAMILY IN CHANGE SUPPORT GROUP. The Optimists have been the major financial supporter of this support group program available to children who have experienced a major change in their lives, such as death or divorce. OTHER PROGRAMS. The Eden Prairie Optimists also donate funds to other organizations engaged in youth programs in Eden Prairie. The Optimists also have a member serving on the Eden Prairie Crime Prevention Fund Board and on the Eden Prairie Education Advisory Council. • - MEMORANDUM - TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, P.E. Director of Public Works DATE: September 15, 1988 RE: 1988 Special Assessments Attached is Resolution 88-194A which is identical to the resolution that was adopted on September 8, 1988 by the City Council, except that the only parcels and projects that are listed are those that were continued at the September 8 meeting. The original resolution and the attachment was corrected as approved on September 8. For instance, changes were made in the exclusions for utilities for Prairie View Drive. These changes are reflected in the final copy of the original resolution and exhibit, but have not been forwarded to you a second time since the assessment role was adopted at the first hearing. The corrections shown on Exhibit A of 88-194A are explained as follows: 52-105 1. The first parcel had a portion of the cost shown as excluded for a period of 5 years. However, this parcel is not homesteaded and therefore the entire amount was moved to the 1989 column. 2. The next parcel is owned by David Nelson who asked that his property be treated as homesteaded. We therefore shifted approximately $10,000.00 into the 5-year exclusion column. Additionally, he asked that the front footage be corrected. The total amount now reflects approximately a 30- foot reduction in front footage as per that correction. 3. The final parcel had the entire amount shown as a 1989 assessment. We have determined that the parcel is, in fact, homesteaded and the utility portion has been shifted to the 1994 column. TRUNK SEWER AND WATER 1. The first parcel is the property that was owned by Mr. Touve. We did find that he had paid trunk assessment previously. 2. The next two parcels had the cost shown as 1989 assessments. These two parcels are being developed and the homesteaded portion is shown in the exclusion column, while the balance will be assessed in 1989. 1 I?li • 3. The final two items are parcels that are homesteaded but had shown up in our records as non-homesteaded parcels. Therefore, the $520.00 assessment is shown in the 1994 exclusion column and a comment will be added to the assessment records that will indicate additional assessments will be levied upon further development. CONNECTION FEES 1. This parcel is the one that was owned by Touve and he did, in fact, pay connection fees for the lot and the assessment amount as therefore been deleted. Aside from specific parcels that were continued, Mr. Gust from Prairie View Drive asked that the City consider adopting a policy allowing for assessment of fees charged at time of plumbing permit issuance. City Staff has discussed this and since the entire project was allowed a 5-year exclusion for utility assessments regardless of connection status, we feel that no change in the fee policy at permit issuance is advisable. To my knowledge, we have always required permits to be cash transactions in similar situations and a change would be both difficult to administer and a significant record keeping task. One Prairie View Drive resident requested that the condition of the sod be reviewed. We did, in fact, review the area and found that most of the homes have allowed the sod to die. I say this with some confidence, since at lease two homes have maintained the sod that was installed and is in excellent condition. It is our recommendation that we do not participate in the cost to replace the sod that has been lost. The property owners were given a letter that told them that it was their responsibility for maintenance and it seems that all but a few made a conscious decision to ignore that maintenance as well as the potential consequences of their actions. Since we have numerous projects that could involve similar situations, a consistent message that people must take some responsibility for a project should be given. If you concur with this recommendation, we will write a letter to each of the property owners advising them of the decision. The center island in the cul- de-sac is on City property and we will do some weed control and overseed the area, which should be effective. EAD:ss • 2 1 2 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNES0IA RESOLUTION 88-194A RESOLUTION APPROVING 1988 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections in the proposed assessments for the following improvements to wit: (See Exhibit A attached) WHEREAS, assessments as proposed in said Exhibit A are assessments for those properties specifically continued from the September 8, 1988 public hearing; WHEREAS, the City Council hereby concurs with these corrections; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such proposed assessments are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands in the final assessment rolls, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of years as shown on Exhibit A. Installments shall bear interest at the rates shown on Exhibit A, commencing January 1, 1989. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid on or before November 15, 1988. 3. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes beginning in 1989. 4. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvements but not herein assessed for the improvement when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 5. The assessment data of Resolution No. 88-161 is herein revised in accordance with Exhibit A attached hereto. ADOPTED BY THE Eden Prairie City Council on September 20, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk EXHIBIT A A. I.C. 52-105 Watermain, sanitary sewer, streets and storm sewer on Project Cost: $456,417.00 Bennett Place and Blossom Road. City Share: $ 7,486.49 Net Assessment: $448,930.51 20 Years at 8% Streets = $61.38 Front Foot Lat. San. Sewer = $17.80 Front Foot Lat. Water = $18.74 Front Foot I.C.A 010 INT. 1994 1989 RATE YEARS $AMOUNT ($AMOUNT) ( 52-105 25-1I6-22-32-0007 8 PO -- 52-105 26-116-22-41-0037 8 20 14,283.12 * 10 52-105 25-116-22-32-0030 8 740.50 14,603. 0 ** 20 2,740.50 4,603,50 *** NOTES: * Parcel erroneously classified as homesteaded ** Correction of front footage as per public hearing comments, given homestead status *** Parcel is homesteaded and shall receive utility exclusion t Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A September 20, 1988 8. SUPPLEMENTALS Trunk Sewer and Water $1,014,933.06 Lateral Sewer and Water 28,826.00 Ring Road 754.60 Re Ring Road Storm Sewer 2,055.68 Prairie Center Drive 51-308A Defer 3,100.00 Reassess Eden Prairie Acres 41,954.84 Exclusion 26,369.67 Trunk Exclusion 3,440.00 Connection Fee 43,710.00 Reassessment of Chatham Woods 97,292.22 INT. 1994 1989 I.C.#1 PIDN RATE YEARS $AMOUNT ($AMOUNT) TRUNK SEWER AND WATER TSBW 05-116-22-33-0033 8 20 --- 0 * TSBW 25-116-22-32-0005 B 20 520.00 0 ** TS&W 25-116-22-32-0007 8 20 520.00 3,666.00 ** TS&W 25-116-22-32-0030 8 20 520.00 0 *** TS&W 26-116-22-41-0037 8 20 520.00 0 *** CONNECTION FEES CONN 05-116-22-33-0033 8 20 0 **** NOTES: * Previously assessed ** Portions of underlying homesteaded parcel to receive 5-year exclusion, balance to be assessed in 1989 *** Homesteaded parcel to be given 5-year exclusion, excess acreage to be assessed at time of development **** Previously collected as a connection fee with building permit 2 a\ i CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-188 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DATASERV PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT TO THE OVERALL PRAIRIE CENTER BUSINESS PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the Datasery development is considered a proper amendment to the overall Prairie Center Business Park Planned Unit Development Concept; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the request of Opus Corporation for PUD Concept Amendment approval to the overall Prairie Center Business Park Planned Unit Development Concept for the Datasery development and recommended approval of the PUD Concept Amendment to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on September 20, 1988; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Datasery development PUD Concept Amendment, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval to the overall Prairie Center Business Park Planned Unit Development Concept as outlined in the application materials for Dataserv. 3. That the PUD Concept Amendment meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated August 8, 1988. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 20th day of September, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION H88-I89 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF DATASERV FOR OPUS CORPORATION BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Datasery for Opus Corporation, dated September 2, 1988, consisting of 17.4 acres into 1 lot for construction of additional parking spaces, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 20th day of September, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • • MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Michael 0. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE:' September 16, 1988 SUBJECT: Datasery Datasery is an existing industrial building at the intersection of Prairie Center Orive and Technology Drive. The building is currently being utilized at 50" office and 50% warehouse and assembly. The existing use of the building generates 319 p.m. peak hour trips which is above the 1985 8RW traffic study report of 217 trips. Datasery is requesting that additional vacant land on-site be rezoned to I-2 Park to accomodate additional parking and a waiver through the PUD for up to 100% office in the I-2 Park Zoning District. At 1D0% office use, the p.m. peak hour trip generation would be 495 trips. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning to 1-2 Park and a waiver through the PUD to allow up to 100% office occupancy based upon the following assumptions: 1. A 100% office use is a use that is contemplated in the Major Center Area. 2. The Floor Area Ratio is based on 150,000 square feet of building on 17.4 acres is .20. The maximum Floor Area Ratio for office buildings under City Code is .5. 3. If all road and intersection improvements are made as identified in the 1985 8RW traffic study, the level of service at the affected intersections would be at level of service D or better. The rezoning to I-2 Park and PUD waiver for 100% office was predicated on Datasery developing and implementing a traffic management plan which would reduce the p.m. peak hour traffic generation to 319 trips. The attached Datasery traffic management plan prepared by the Opus Corporation indicates that for each additional 25,000 square feet of office space conversion, 105 employees must participate in the flex time program. These employees must end the day before 4:30 or after 6:00 p.m. The Planning Commission recommended that the traffic management plan be implemented effective the 1st of January, I989. The Datasery site will have to be monitored periodically to see that the traffic management plan is working. ) iA fig® OPUS CORPORATION DES4iNFRS•HUIEDFHS•DFVHCPFHS 800 Dna Curer 99C0 Hirn Rn,!d fear Ma,nq A:Idress Mmnernnka,Mmnrsnta s5343 P D Ra ISO M.nneapoh9.M.nneuua 55440 (6121 916 4444 September 15, 1988 Mr. Mike Franzen Senior Planner Department of City Planning City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2499 RE: Datasery Dear Mike: Enclosed is a revised Traffic Management Plan which Datasery has agreed to which includes the changes which you and I discussed. Datasery currently projects that the office space conversion will occur according to the following schedule: Year Square Feet 1988 6,000 1989 29,000 1990 1991 27,000 1992 15,000 We request that this item be scheduled for consideration by the City Council on September 20th. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Mi hele Foster Director Real Estate Development MF!ck • • Dr.ir and Arr I rr c 11 M.nnrapnhs•Ch.rago•Phorn..•M rwarrkre•Tampa•Pensacola $ DATASERV TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN Datasery is committed to the implementation of strategies which will reduce traffic generated from its facility. Specifically, Datasery makes the following commitments to reduce traffic generated from its site: 1. Datasery will work with Minnesota Rideshare to implement a ridesha ring program. 2. Datasery will provide a visible and convenient place within the building to make transit and rideshare information available. 3. Datasery will designate parking spaces for carpool and vanpool vehicles serving the building at locations with convenient access to the building. 4. Datasery will implement a flextime program to reduce its share of traffic congestion on Prairie Center Drive and Technology Drive. 5. Flextime employees will end the day before 4:30 p.m. or after 6:00 p.m. 6. Currently Datasery is utilizing 75,000 square feet of the existing building for office use. The flextime program identified in this plan shall. apply to any conversion of existing space beyond the existing utilization of office space to a maximum of 100% of the building. 7. The flextime program will be implemented as follows: Additional Office Space Employees Included in Converted Flextime Program For each 25,000 Sq.Ft. 105 increment 8. This traffic management plan will be implemented effective 1-1-89 or when the first 25,000 square feet of space is converted to office usage, whichever occurs later. 9. The City of Eden Prairie will evaluate this plan one year after the first conversion of office space occurs. 10. This is an agreement between Dataserv, Inc. and the City of Eden Prairie and shall expire upon the termination of Dataserv's lease in the building. 2,IgL STAFF REPORT i TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: August 4, 1988 PROJECT: Datasery LOCATION: Southeast quadrant of the intersection of Prairie Center Drive and Technology Drive. APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Opus Corporation REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 17.4 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 17.4 with a waiver for Office use up to 100% Office within the I-2 Park zoning district. 3. Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 Park on 7.4 acres. ' 4. Preliminary Plat of 17.4 acres into one lot for the construction of additional parking spaces for the Datasery Headquarters. ac- Background ` iip-sER • \r-------- This is a continued item from the O C-REG-SE•• June 10, 1988, meeting. Since that time, BRW has • prepared a traffic _PLAZA _`\/ study which indicates the projected - ��---- p.m. peak hour for Datasery based upon the anticipated employees. In �- INIIII1 �_— addition, Datasery has made a policy ;.h 'yam- committment to consider flex time as -S:// � • NreI part of a traffic management plan to reduce the p.m. peak hour traffic. $ ^RE r~ ier•ArN PROPOSED SITE Tra f f i c �����.#d,4 Df The attached traffic study from BRW • �, �':!%! r. indicates that, based on 739 ' •' C-REG-SEI projected employees, the p.m. peak hour traffic for Datasery at 100% ` pR, :�` office, would be 406 trips. This C-REG-- : —. ( compares with the BRW allocation for , this site of 217 trips. RE . •iit IS AREA LOCATION MAP i1 1 • Datasery 2 August 4, 1938 Currently, the building has 582 employees, and the existing trip generation is 319 trips. Even though this is above the BRW allocation, this is an existing condition and could be considered as the traffic allocation for this site, since traffic was not expected to be a problem when Datasery was initially reviewed. At that time, traffic expected to be generated by Datasery (134 p.m. trips) would be less than the BRW allocation. This calculation was based on building use, square footage, and standard occupancy rates. The City and Datasery did not expect the building to be occupied more intensely than the norm. The City is able to control traffic based on building design and use at the time of rezoning. Dnce a building is constructed, unless there is a special agreement, it is difficult to control how intensely the building is occupied unless a City approval is required. If the Planning Commission concurs that the traffic allocation for this site can be 319 trips, then the peak hour reduction should be 87 trips. Since Datasery has agreed in principle to consider a flex time program, 160 employees would have to finish work before or after the peak hour (5-6 p.m.) in the Major Center Area. Traffic generation over the allocation in the BRW study, should not generally be advocated for projects in the MCA. But since this is an existing condition and a unique situation, it should not invalidate the study if consideration is given to the following: 1. A 100% office use is a use that is contemplated in the Major Center Area. 2. The Floor Area Ratio based upon 154,000 square feet of building, on 17.4' acres is D.20. The maximum Floor Area Ratio for office buildings under City Code is 0.5. 3. A reduction of 87 peak hour trips (22%) appears to be an achievable amount of trip reduction with a traffic management plan committing to staggered work hours. The BRW report indicates that other communities with traffic management plans have experienced a 22% decrease in peak hour traffic with implementation of variable work hours. 4. If all road and intersection improvements are made as identified in the 1985 BRW traffic study, the level of service at the affected intersections would be at level of service D or better. Level of service D is a design standard for intersections. Three intersections are affected by Datasery traffic; Prairie Center Drive and Highway #5, Prairie Center Drive and Technology Drive, and Prairie Center Drive and Highway #169. Currently all of these intersections are at level of service F. This means that the traffic management plans should be implemented concurrent with the conversion to more office use. The current site plan depicts a total of 955 parking spaces. If it assumed that approximately 5% of these spaces would be designated for visitor parking, approximately 900 employees may ultimately occupy the building. A total of 900 employees would translate into 495 p.m. peak hour trips, or 2.3 times the amount allocated to the site by the BRW traffic study. Since office uses generate p.m. peak hour traffic at a rate of 1.72 trips per 1,000 square feet, 495 p.m. peak hour trips would translate into a 267,000 square foot building, at a 0.38 FAR for this site. The average FAR for 3 major PUD's in the Major Center Area including Southwest Crossing, Hartford Insurance, and Wilson Learning, is a 0.36 FAR. These sites were approved with traffic allocation and a 20% reduction in traffic. 21g7 Datasery 3 August 4, 1988 Therefore, if Dataserv, at 900 employees, is equivalent to a 0.38 FAR, traffic generated would be slightly higher, but comparable to traffic volumes generated from other office PUD's in the Major Center Area. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Following are alternative courses of action: 1. Approve the rezoning to I-2 Park, PUD Concept Amendment, Preliminary Plat, and PUD waiver for up to 100% office for 739 parking spaces for employees plus 5% for visitors, subject to a traffic management plan to reduce p.m. peak hour to 319 trips. This would be based on the assumptions that office is the highest and best use for the site, the low FAR, and that the current traffic generation of 319 though above the BRW allocation is an existing condition and unique to the property. The traffic management plan based on flex time should be completed prior to City Council review and implemented concurrent with conversion of space for more employees. 2. Approve the rezoning to I-2 Park, PUD Concept Amendment, Preliminary Plat, and PUD waiver for up to 100% office, for 900 employee parking spaces plus 5% for visitors. This would be based on the assumption that office is the highest and best use for the site, and that traffic generated would be comparable to other office PUD's in the MCA. 3. Deny the request for rezoning to I-2 Park, PUD Concept Amendment, Preliminary Plat, and PUD waiver for up to 100% office, based upon traffic exceeding the 1985 City Traffic Plan for the MCA. Staff would recommend Alternative 1. Should the Commission recommend approval of the rezoning it should be predicated on the requirement for a sidewalk connection to Prairie Center Drive as identified in the June 10, 1988, Staff Report. 4 al j�� STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THRDUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: June 10, 1988 PROJECT: Datasery LOCATION: Southeast quadrant of the intersection of Prairie Center Drive and Technology Drive APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Opus Corporation REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 17.4 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 17.4 acres with a waiver for office use up to 100% within the I-2 Zoning District. 3. Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 Park on 7.4 acres. 4. Preliminary Plat of 17.4 acres into one lot for the construction of additional parking spaces for the Datasery Headquarters. Background This site is currently guided 1-11111' C REG-SER Industrial. Part of the site ;LL N= including the existing building, to existing parking, and the parking ,, C-REG-SE'• lot expansion approved last year, is 4( currently zoned I-2 Park. The 400 -1'—"balance of the land area is � —� � currently zoned Rural. 1( PUD Amendment The I-2 Park zoning district will „ permit up to 5D% of any building to -' PROPOSED SITE JF be used for office purposes. The Datasery building is currently occupied as 43% office, 35% k warehouse, and 22% assembly. Data- C-REG-SE sery intends to consolidate its administrative services within the 5�0 ,p existing headquarters building on C-REG-• e IS-RE CS AREA LOCATION MAP Datasery 2 June 10, 1988 this site, and convert the majority of the space in the building from warehouse and assembly use to office over time and on a stage basis. Since the Office zoning district does not permit assembly or warehouse, and since Datasery hits indicated that some of the space may remain as warehouse or service, a waiver is being requested up to 1D0% office through a PUD District Review. Site Plan With the conversion of non-office to office use within the building, a new site plan has been submitted which shows the expansion of the parking area to the south onto the remaining undeveloped portion of the property. The parking expansion areas meets the minimum setback requirement for the I-2 Park zoning district. Parking required for a 154,0D0 square foot office building would be 646 spaces, which is based upon a Code ratio of 4.2 parking spaces per 1,00D square feet. The site plan depicts a total of 955 parking spaces. The dimensions depicted on the site plan show a 24-foot aisle width for the parking areas. The City Code would require a 25-foot wide drive lane. The site plan should be revised to reflect this dimension throughout the parking area. Traffic The Datasery site is part of the 17.4-acre, March, 1984, Prairie Center Business Park which was approved for 206,00D square feet of building at 50% office and 5D% warehouse. This use would generate 200 p.m. peak hour trips. Subsequent to this PUD approval, the BRW traffic study for the Major Center Area was completed in April, 1985, which allocates a total of 217 trips to the Datasery site. This allocation was based on the assumption that commercial would be the highest and best use of the site since it was uncertain at that time if the PUD would ever proceed to development. The Datasery building, approved in November, 19B5, was for 154,000 square feet at 43% office, 35% warehouse, and 22% assembly. This building use would generate 134 p.m. peak hour trips according to the attached memorandum from BRW based on standard office generation rates. This trip generation is less than the 19B4 PUD traffic and the 19B5 MCA traffic allocation. If the Datasery building is converted to 100% office, the p.m. peak hour generation would be 265 trips based on typical office generation rates and the solution to traffic reduction could be as simple as limiting the amount of office conversion through the PUD District Review by waiver to B0%. However, Dataserv, at 100% office, is not a typical office use in terms of traffic generation. Typical office uses generate a p.m. peak hour rate of 1.72 trips per 1,000. This assumes 4 employees per 1,000 square feet of building area. Both of these numbers are based on Institute of Traffic Engineers data upon which the MCA Traffic Study is based. Using these two numbers, means that 0.43 trips per employee is a standard p.m. trip generation rate. Assuming the building is converted to 1D0% office, and the projected employees according to Datasery is 955, the p.m. peak hour trip generation would be 610. The Datasery building has a higher percentage of employees per 1,000 square feet of building area. This is 6.2 employees per 1,000 as compared with the standard of 4 employees per 1,000.• The Datasery building is being used 1-1/2 times more intensely than the typical office use. To conclude, the p.m. peak hour generation of 4I0 trips would be 193 trips more than the BRW allocation of 217 trips. 21'�I Datasery 3 June 10, 1988 ab With trips being generated far in excess of the BRW allocation, a key question is how much non-office use can be converted to office in the existing Datasery building without increasing traffic beyond the BRW allocation. Before this question can be answered, it should be determined if the current use of the Datasery building is generating traffic consistent with the BRW estimate of 134 p.m. peak hour trips. Datasery currently has approximately 600 employees or 3.9 employees per 1,000 square feet of building. Since this is close to standard office occupancy of 4 employees per 1,000 square feet of building, a p.m. trip rate of 1.72 trips per 1,000 square feet could be used. This would mean that the current use of the building is generating 265 p.m. trips, 48 trips more traffic than 217 allocated to the site. Knowing that 100% office occupancy would generate 410 p.m. peak hour trips, and that the current use of the building generates 265 trips, both exceeding the BRW allocation, it is clear that no additional non-office areas can be converted to office. This decision would still leave traffic being generated higher than the allocation, but traffic would not be any worse than it is today. To occupy the building as 100% office would require that Datasery implement a traffic management plan to reduce peak hour traffic to 217 trips. Grading and Tree Loss Approval for the original 1984 Prairie Center Business Park and the 19B5 amendment for the Datasery project, required saving trees in the southeast corner of the site and submittal of a detailed tree inventory. Although grading will remove about 1/2 of the existing tree mass on the site, most of the trees are 4 to 10-inch in diameter elm trees. The tree inventory indicates a total of 343 caliper inches of oak trees on-site, of which 49 caliper inches would be lost, or 14%. The amount of tree replacement would be 11 inches which has been incorporated into the landscape plan. Landscaping The landscape plan meets the minimum caliper inch requirement for City Code. Parking areas are screened from Prairie Center Drive through bermings and plantings. • Tree replacement for 11 cal iper inches have been incorporated into the landscape plan. The landscape plan meets the minimum 5% parking island requirement per City Code. Utilities The existing Datasery facil ities are connected to City sewer and water. Storm Water Run-off Since the size of the parking area is large, it will be required that catch basins be provided within the parking area to collect the storm water run-off. Prior to final plat approval, the developer should submit a detailed storm water run-off plan for review by the City Engineer. Sidewalks The Datasery building was approved with a requirement to provide a sidewalk connection from the building to the trail along Prairie Center Drive. With the reconfiguration of the parking area, the sidewalk would be removed along the • Datasery 4 June 10, 1988 westerly driveway entrance to the site. The plans should be revised to provide a sidewalk connection to Prairie Center Drive. Possible locations for this sidewalk would be to run around the perimeter of the parking lot in a southeasterly direction back to Prairie Center Drive or to increase the width of the planting islands along the westerly driveway entrance to allow for a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk. Concl usion Traffic is the main issue with this proposal. With current traffic and projected traffic in excess of the allocation for the site, the question is how can the building be utilized and still meet the 217 p.m. trip allocation. If no more space is converted to office and the number of employees remains the same, traffic would still exceed the allocation, but would not be any worse than it is today, 48 trips more in the peak hour. For Datasery to have more employees on site, and convert the building to 100% office use, a traffic management program would be needed to limit the amount of employees leaving the site to 217 during the peak hour. This traffic management plan should be prepared by a professional traffic engineer. The appropriate action would be to continue the item and return to the Planning Commission when the traffic management plan is complete. 1 PLANNING ,Y rRANSPORTSHIQN ENGINEERING II ARCRITEC I URE RRNMLTI RING"+()`.[ N()T SFLI.D Jn�NiS t.Aul)N)R 'NG • OR.. SOUTUF • NO T'HD SIHFU . aT.'.f*116ti MN SSi'S • Fi-,&.F' e2)/00703 � .7.iYs'-.L==e..'i.CERLTS' 'E.IlNli^d.:RR.lirmitt`fill-Mr",rt£7.4'UMMEMEASiEe=132 22212i'.nai0;,,ilfyjlwl:Qp,pys+.W #n MEMORANDUM Date: April 25, 1988 To: Mr. Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner City of Eden Prairie 6700 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 From: Nancy Heuer, P.E. Re: DataSery Traffic Study This memorandum discusses the trip generation characteristics associated with the proposed land use conversion of the DataSery facility located at Prairie Center Drive and Technology Drive in Eden Prairie. The site is located in Zone 25 of the Major Center Area with an existing land use mix of office, warehouse and assembly. The proposal is to convert existing facilities to a single land use type of office. Table 1 shows the trip generation based on existing indivi- dual land uses. ' TABLE 1 EXISTING LAND USE TRIP GENERATION A Daily PM Peak Area Trip Hour Trip Daily PM Peak Land Use Type (KSF*) Rate** Rate** Trips Hour Trips Office Area 66.0 12.30 1.73 812 114 Warehouse 53.6 4.88 0.21 262 11 i Assembly 34.0 5.43 0.26 185 9 TOTAL 153.6 1,259 134 f — * KSF = 1000 square feet ** Trip rate in vehicle trips per 1000 square feet The trip rates used in this analysis were derived from the BRW study of the Major Center Area and documented in the report "Prairie Center Drive/County Road I - MINNEAPOLIS DENVER PHOENIX Mr. Michael D. Franzen 4 April 25, 1988 Page 2 18 Traffic Study" prepared for the City of Eden Prairie in 1985. Each trip generation rate was developed to fit the unique conditions within the Major Center Area. The trip productions shown in the above table, therefore, charac- terize the existing land use conditions at the DataSery site. The trip rates shown above were also applied to the evaluation of the proposed land use con- ditions. The Prairie Center Drive/County Road 18 Traffic Study assumed that Zone 25 would be developed as commercial property. The study also found that the trips gen- erated within the entire Major Center Area would have to be reduced by twenty percent for the ultimate street system to handle the projected traffic volumes. The number of trips which were allocated to Zone 25 with the twenty percent reduction is shown in Table 2. TABLE 2 ZONE 25 TRIP ALLDCATION Daily PM Peak Area Trip Hour Trip Daily PM Peak Land Use Type (KSF*) Rate** Rate** Trips Hour Trips 1985 Study Trip Allocation: Commercial 148.0 35.0 2.59 5,180 383 After 20% Reduction: 4,144 306 * KSF = 1000 square feet ** Trip rate in vehicle trips per 1000 square feet As shown, Zone 25 is allocated a total of 4,144 daily trips and 306 PM peak hour trips after the 20 percent trip reduction. This level of trip generation is based on the ultimate land use assumption of 148,000 square feet of commercial development. The proportion of these trips allocated to the DataSery site is based on its proportion of the total acreage in Zone 25. The DataSery site is 17 acres of a total of 24 acres in Zone 25. Its proportional allocation of trips is therefore 71 percent of the total trips allocated to Zone 25, and 29 percent of the trips are allocated to the remaining seven acres of Zone 25. This allocation is shown in Table 3. ; � Mr. Michael D. Franzen April 25, 1988 Page 3 TABLE 3 DATASERV TRIP ALLOCATION Total DataSery Remaining Location Zone 25 Site (71%) (29%) Daily Trip 4,144 2,942 1,202 PM Peak Hour Trips 306 217 89 Based on the above criteria, the DataSery site is allocated a total of 2,942 daily trips. As shown in Table 4, the trips expected to be generated after the proposed land use conversion to office are 1,894 trips on a daily basis. The result is that the DataSery site can be expected to generate fewer daily trips than it has been allocated. TABLE 4 COMPARISON OF DATASERV TRIP GENERATION AND ALLOCATION Daily PM Peak Area Trip Hour Trip Daily PM Peak Land Use Type (KSF*) Rate** Rate** Trips Hour Trips Office 154.0 12.3 1.72 1,894 265 Trips allocated to Data Serv: 2,942 217 Difference: -1,048 +4B * KSF = 1000 square feet ** Trip rate in vehicle trips per 1000 square feet Analysis of PM peak hour trips is based on the same criteria, but indicates that the DataSery site will generate trips in excess of its PM peak hour allocation. The DataSery site is allocated a total of 217 trips during the PM peak hour. The trips expected to be generated after the proposed land use conversion to office are 265 trips during the PM peak hour. The result is the DataSery site can be expected to generate 48 PM peak hour trips over its allocation. acui FJen Prairie.Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 8, 1988 Page 2 MOTION: tt Motion was made by Ruebling and seconded by Dodge to approve the minutes of the July 11, 1988,Planning Commission meeting as published and amended. Motion carried 3-0-2,Hallett and Schuck abstained, B. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 25. 1988. The following changes were made: Page 11,Paragraph 2,should read: Dodge expressed concern that the guideplan is low density residential for this site and the City has made a prior commitment to the homeowners regarding land use. MOTION: Motion was made by Ruebling and seconded by Dodge to approve the minutes of the July 25, 1988,Planning Commission meeting as published and amended. Motion carried 3-0-2,Hallett and Schuck abstained. IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A.DATASERV,by Opus Corporation. Request for PUD Amendment Review on 17.4 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 17.4 acres with a waiver for office use up to 100% within the 1-2 Zoning District,Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 on 7.4 acres and Preliminary Plat of 17.4 acres into 1 lot for construction of additional parking spaces for the DataSery Headquarters. Location: South of Technology Drive,east of Prairie Center Drive. A continued public hearing. Franzen reported that the item had been continued from previous Planning Commission meetings pending receipt of the BRW Traffic Study concerning this property. By recommendation of the Planning Commission,BRW conducted a trip analysis per 100%office conversion. The City has been working with DataSery to reduce the PM peak hour trips through traffic management. Bob Worthington,Executive Director of Opus Corporation presented the proposal for the expansion to 100%office for the DataSery headquarters. He indicated that at the time of initial rezoning in 1986, they were not aware of allocated trips. When this was pointed out,DataSery asked the City to provide them with the basis for the conclusion of the study to assist them in resolving the traffic situation. They now understand the reason and concur with the Staff Report. He slated that in meeting with the DataSery people,they are ready and willing to implement a Traffic Management Plan,herein referred to as TMP, to take place when the City feels the traffic number reaches the quota allocated. They have requested that a TMP plan be called for and approved as part of the conversion,and ask that the TMP go into effect when the expansion of the parking and 100%office conversion to DataSery has taken place. Franzen reported that the current PM Peak Hour traffic generation was 319 trips,exceeding the BRW allocation of 217 trips. He stated that the current traffic level could be considered as the new base allocation for the site. The expansion of the building to 739 employees would generate 406 PM Peak Hour trips. A TMP using flex time,could reduce traffic by 87 trips to the current traffic level for the site. He felt the TMP should be implemented concurrent with the conversion of warehouse to office space as the three affected intersections were already at Level of Service F. tidal Prairie Planning Commi ion Mcciing Minutes August 8, 1988 • Pagc 3 Ruebling inquired how 539 employees could leave the site when the projected traffic based on the existing use is 319 PM peak hour trips. Ruebling also inquired what hours were considered peak hours. Franzen responded that 3-6 p.m.drivers were observed to register the number of cars leaving the site. The peak hour for purpose of the study was 5-6 p.m. Franzen added that peak hour traffic was a percentage of the total traffic going to and from the site over the day. Ruebling asked if improvements to Hwy.5 would have an effect on the level of traffic. Franzen replied that when the improvements are made to the highway and other improvements identified in the BRW Study,the level of service would improve to level of Service D. Ruebling asked if additional improvements were scheduled for the roads in the area. Franzen responded that the BRW Study showed improvements to Hwy.18 and 169. There were no public comments on this item. Discussion followed on number of cars leaving at peak hours and the number during the day and the monitoring necessary to stagger hours for employees. Worthington clarified that DataSery was not in disagreement with the Staff,and had agreed to a TMP. They would like to have the implementation to take place once there was a true problem,and stated that time was needed to set up the TMP. Hallett asked what the recourse was for the City if the proponent did not implement the plan. Franzen stated that it would be a zoning violation. If a resolution could not be reached between Staff and the proponent,the proponent would have to appear before the Council to work the situation out. Hallett asked if 900 employees would be the maximum and proponent responded affirmatively. Dodge inquired how the City in the future would determine which business was generating a traffic problem,if major traffic problems occurred. Franzen responded that an inventory of use in the MCA would be needed and traffic counts where major employees exist. Worthington concluded that DataSery wants to be a good neighbor but they suffer from growth and not enough office space. They were willing to make a commitment to a TMP by the time they go to the City Council. Their major problem was the flex time as it would take time to implement the program. Ruebling stated that the problem to be resolved by the TMP already exists today,since affected intersections exceed capacity now. Worthington stated that in the spirit of compromise,a TMP would be compiled and drafted. It would include flex time and a specific implementation date and the City would give DataSery the time to put a TMP together. Franzen asked how long it would take before the 900 employees would be placed on the site. McKenzie responded this would occur 6 months from today through a 2 to 3 year period. Hallett asked Staff what the time period would be acceptable for them to get the conversion and flex time worked out. Franzen responded that by the first of the year would be reasonable. Worthington asked if an extension to spring on the TMP was possible if the employee rate was not up to the level for them to implement the TMP. Eden Prairie Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 8, 1988 Page 4 Ruebling responded that of PM peak traffic was already in excess of the allocation,and felt phasing the conversion would not make a difference in the TMP requirement. Franzen concluded that DataSery was willing to produce a TMP with 900 employees and Staff was comfortable with that. Ruebling stated he was comfortable with giving DataSery time to implement the TMP by the first of the year. Worthington asked for clarification regarding the parking lot that it could be finished and landscaped prior to TMP implementation. Commission agreed that would be acceptable. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Ruebling to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Schuck to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Opus Corporation for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment to the overall Prairie Business Center Planned Unit Development Concept on 17.4 acres,for expansion of the DataSery parking lot,based on plans dated July 10,1988,subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 4,1988,and that a traffic management plan based on flex time to reduce peak hour traffic to 319 trips should be completed prior to City Council review and implemented by January 1, 1989. Motion carried 5-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Schuck to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Opus Corporation for Planned Unit Development District Review on 17.4 acres, with a waiver for office use up to 100%within the 1-2 Zoning District,and Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 on 7.4 acres for expansion of the DataSery parking lot,based on plans dated July 10, 1988,subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 4,1988,and that a traffic management plan based on flex time to reduce peak hour traffic to 319 trips should be completed prior to City Council review and implemented by January 1,1989. Motion carried 5-0-0 MOTION 4: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Schuck to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Opus Corporation for Preliminary Plat of 17.4 acres into one lot for construction of the expansion to the DataSery parking lot,based on plans dated July 10,1988,subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 4,1988,and that a traffic management plan based on flex time to reduce peak hour traffic to 319 trips should be completed prior to City Council review and implemented by January 1,1989. Motion carried 5-0-0 .I Hen Prairie Planning Commission Mccting Minuics July 25, 1988 Pagc 2 Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-9,5 on 92.7 acres and from Rural to RI-13.5 on 53.6 jacres,Preliminary Play of 148.2 acres into 367 single family lots,28 outlots and road right-of-way, review of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet for construction of a residential development. Location: West of County Road 4,southeast of the Minneapolis and St.Louis Railroad. A continued public hearing. Franzen reported that Phases 2 through 6 of the project were continued from the June 27th,1988 meeting pending receipt of the completed Southwest Area Study. He reported that the study would be completed in the next couple of weeks. MOTION: Motion was made by Ruebling and seconded by Fell to continue Fairfield,Phases 2-6 to the August 22, 1988,Planning Commission meeting,pending review and approval of the Southwest Area Study,directing Staff to republish and renotice the item in the paper and to the surrounding neighborhood. Motion carried 5-0-0 B. DATASERV by Opus Corporation. Request for PUD Amendment Review on 17.4 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 17.4 acres with a waiver for office use up to 100% within the 1-2 Zoning District,Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 on 7.4 acres and Preliminary Plat of 17.4 acres into 1 lot for construction of additional parking spaces for the Datasery Headquarters, Location: South of Technology Drive,east of Prairie Center Drive.A continued public hearing. Franzen reported that this item has been continued from two previous Planning Commission meetings pending receipt of the traffic study on the property. He stated the traffic study was received last week and indicated 406 trips would be generated at the site. Staff plans to discuss with developer and owner a traffic management plan which would include ride share,and different groups leaving work at different times. Development of such management could reduce traffic by 80 trips per day. • Ruebling inquired if a traffic management plan was developed with Datasery and then the building was used by another company,would they conformed to the traffic management restriction. Franzen replied that any new use of the building must meet the 1985 BRW Traffic allocation. If trips generated by a new use would exceed this,a traffic management plan may be necessary. MOTION: Motion was made by Ruebling and seconded by Fell to continue Datasery to the August 8, 1988, Planning Commission meeting,pending Staff review of the traffic study on the proposed development. • • • • Eden Prairie Planning Commission Meeting July 11, 1988 Page 2 B. Planning Commission Meeting_Minutes of AprII 25, 1988. MOTION: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Hallett to approve the minutes of the April 11,1988, Planning Commission meeting as published. Motion carried 3-0-1, Bye abstained. C. planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 13, 1988, MOTION: Motion was made by Ruebling and seconded by Bye to approve the minutes of the April 11,1988, Planning Commission meeting as published. Motion carried 2-0-2,Hallett and Dodge abstained. IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. DATASERV by Opus Corporation. Request for PUD Amendment Review on 17.4 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 17.4 acres with a waiver for office use up to 100% • within the 1-2 Zoning District,Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 on 7.4 acres and Preliminary Plat of 17.4 acres into 1 lot for construction of additional parking spaces for the Datasery Headquarters. Location: South of Technology Drive,east of Prairie Center Drive. A continued public hearing. Fransen reported that at the last meeting with BRW the data for driveway entrances and turn lanes had not been assembled for the Southwest Area Study,thus delaying the final results of the traffic study for the Datasery project. Staff was also planning a meeting with Datasery for traffic management discussion to reduce traffic flow numbers. Staff recommended that this item be continued for two weeks. MOTION: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to continue this item to the July 25, 1988, Planning Commission meeting pending receipt and analysis of the traffic information for the proposed development. Motion carried 5-0-0 • ��IUI } CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-206 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and, WHEREAS, the proposal of Tandem Properties for development of Fairfield Phases 2 through 6, for Medium Density Residential and Low Density Residential use requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: approximately 73.9 acres for Medium Density Residential and Low Density Residential located west of County Road #4, southeast of the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railroad be modified from Industrial to Medium Density Residential and Low Density Residential. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 20th day of September, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION N88-207 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DEVELDPMENT OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF FAIRFIELO PHASES 2 THROUGH 6 FOR TANDEM PROPERTIES WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Fairfield Phases 2 through 6 by Tandem Properties and considered their request for approval for development (and variances) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on September 20, 1988; NOW, THEREFORE, BY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Fairfield Phases 2 through 6 by Tandem Properties, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, is legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Development approval as ( outlined in the plans, as revised, dated September 14, 1988. 3. That the PUD Development meet the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated August 22, 1988. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 20th day of September, 1988. • Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-209 A RESOLUTION FINDING THE AMENDED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR FAIRFIELD PHASES 2 THROUGH 6, A PRIVATE ACTION, DOES NOT REQUIRE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of Eden Prairie did hold a hearing on September 20, I988, to consider Fairfield Phases 2 through 6 proposal of Tandem Properties; and, WHEREAS, said development is located on approximately 148.2 acres of land located west of County Road #4, southeast of the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railroad; and, WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on the Fairfield Phases 2 through 6 proposal of Tandem Properties and did recommend • approval of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet finding the project of no significant impact; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, that an Environmental Impact Statement is not necessary for the Fairfield Phases 2 through 6 proposal of Tandem Properties, because the project is not a major action, does not have significant environmental effects, and is not of more than local significance. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a Negative Declaration Notice shall be officially filed with the Minnesota Environmental Quality Council. ADDPTED this 2Dth day of September, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: August 19, 1988 PROJECT: Fairfield Planned Unit Development LOCATION: West of County Road #4, south of Highway #5, north of County Road R1, east of the railroad tracks. APPLICANT: Tandem Corporation Centex Homes Midwest FEE OWNERS: Mr. Herb Mason Mr. Lawrence Sowles REQUEST: 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Industrial to Medium Density Residential on 49.5 acres and from Industrial to Low Density Residential on 24.4 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 148.2 acres. 3. Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers for street frontage and lot size on 148.2 acres. 4. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 on 92.7 acres and from Rural to R1-13.5 on 53.6 acres. 5. Preliminary Plat of 148.2 acres into 367 single family lots, 28 outlots, and road right-of-way. 6. Review of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Background C- 4. At the June 27, 1988, Planning I i1•i� ' Commission meeting, the Planning •�••1. ` 41D Commission voted to approve Phase 1 ' •�•�j�j� - F (rezoning and platting for 68 units) �.•�1�•�•� _ of the Fairfield project and •4.••••*e ii = -• /"'°r' continued Phases 2-6 until the ����� � results of the Southwest Area Plan / •• *ASS were completed. Since that meeting, <i��•••�•�•••••�•�•�1��•• 1 the City Council has also approved /iv A, `I -j-� - mI Phase 1 for zoning and platting. „���. PROPOSED SITE��� lard Although the prel i m i nary draft of ���j���1�������j�1��.��j����r•�1•j•j 1LI i 1 }.. I,#4,PUB ter.,; a .l- • ,21(1. AREA LOCATION MAP i Fairfield Planned Unit Development 2 August 19, 1988 the engineering phasing study will not be completed until the 2nd week in September, there is adequate information at this time, plus plan modifications to complete a review of the PUD Concept, the Guide Plan Change, and the EAW, with rezoning and timing of the implementation of the development to be subject to the final adopted City engineering study. Planned Unit Development Concept Revisions The following revisions have been made in the PUD Concept Plan in response to the recommendations of the June 24, 1988, Staff Report: 1. Revise plans which reduce the overall tree loss of significant trees. The initial estimate for tree loss for Phases 2-6 was approximately 55%. The concept plan has been revised to remove two lots in Block 36, plus a tightening of the grading limits around some of the ponding areas. The change in the plan has reduced the tree loss to 32% or approximately 1,300 caliper inches. Tree replacement would be approximately 690 inches. The tree replacement plan for 69D inches should be submitted prior to review by City Council. Tree loss for Phase 1 was estimated at 30%. The overall tree loss for the project would be 31%. This compares with the average tree loss for 20 other single family subdivisions with tree replacement of approximately 27%. 2. Traffic volumes in the east/west collector roads are expected to be higher than currently anticipated. If the results of the traffic study should verify this cul-de-sacs may be necessary along this roadway to provide for safer access. Although the final results of the traffic analysis are not complete, we know at this time that the north/south collector road and Scenic Heights Road would be the major roads carrying traffic. The east/west collector road is not expected to have high traffic volumes. Therefore, additional cul-de- sacs are not necessary and lots may front onto the road. 3. Revise the plans to show sidewalks and trails as recommended by the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Department. The revised concept plan shows the recommended sidewalks and trails. 4. Provide additional right-of-way if necessary to allow for future extension of Scenic Heights Road to the west. The revised PUD Concept Plan shows the current design for Highway #212. Based upon the location of Highway #212 and the anticipated construction limits, there is adequate room to provide for BO feet of right-of-way for future Scenic Heights Road extension. 5. Revise plans which provides access to the school site. The plan has been revised to provide the access to the school site as originally recommended by City Staff. • Fairfield Planned Unit Development 3 August 19, 1988 Comprehensive Guide Plan Change Approximately 64 acres of land is proposed to be changed from Industrial to Low Density and Medium Density Residential. The changes in the Comprehensive Plan affect the balance of the land uses in the community. There would be a net 4.7% increase in the amount of land guided Medium Density Residential and a 3% reduction in land area which is currently guided Industrial. With the realignment of Highway #212 to an east/west route, the desirability of such an Industrial area may no longer be appropriate. Recognizing this, the City removed the industrial zoning in 198D. The increase in the land area guided Medium Density Residential will he at a 3.11 units per acre which is low since the Medium Density designation of the Guide Plan allows up to 10 units per acre. It should also he considered that the overall density of the 148-acre project is 2.48 units per acre. R1-9.5 Housing In keeping with the City Council's policy on R1-9.5 lots, the Staff has advised the developer that R1-9.5 lots belong in a Medium Density designation of the Comprehensive Guide Plan and are for affordable housing. In Phases 2-6 of Fairfield where the density of the proposed R1-9.5 area exceeds 2.5 units per acre, a Comprehensive Guide Plan Change to Medium Density Residential has been applied for. The amount of area proposed for R1-9.5 zoning is 92.7 acres. Approximately 50 acres of this would he guided Medium Density Residential where the density exceeds 2.5 units per acre. The remaining 42.7 acres would remain Low Density Residential since the density is less than 2.5 units per acre. The Planning Commission should decide on the appropriateness of the R1-9.5 lots in terms of land use and for affordable housing. PUD Waivers The size of the proposed cluster neighborhood is large, totalling 154 units on 49.5 acres. 33 of the R1-9.5 cluster lots are less than the 70-foot minimum street frontage requirement. In addition, 57 of these lots do not meet the minimum 9,500 square foot lot size requirement. The minimum lot size in the project is 8,000 square feet. The waivers for lot size and street frontage are a part of the Planned Unit Development District Review and the Planning Commission should make a recommendation on whether or not the granting of the waivers would result in the better environmentally designed project for the City than if no variances were granted at all. As reasons for the waivers, Commission may wish to consider providing an alternative lifestyle choice, housing affordability, and variety to the site plan with a different orientation of units. The smaller lot sizes also allows for outlots within the cluster areas to be used as private open space. Reasons for not granting the waivers may be the large size of the cluster housing area (154 units on 50 acres) and the overall visual tightness of the density. Environmental Assessment Worksheet Since the project involves more than 150 unattached single family units, an Environmental Assessment Worksheet is required. Potential environmental impacts previously identified were impacts on natural features, noise from the railroad, need for sewer, water, and storm sewer, and road upgradings. Overall tree loss is 31%. This compares favorably with the average tree loss of 27% for other single family subdivisions with tree replacement. A noise assessment ;1 , :l 1 Fairfiel d Planned Unit Development 4 August 19, 1988 study has been completed for lots adjacent to the railroad and shows no thresholds of the PCA are exceeded. Sewer, water, and storm sewer improvements have been identified as part of the preliminary findings of the southwest area phasing plan and there is adequate capacity to handle the project. The overall Fairfield project will have a significant impact on County Road H4 and the Highway #4 and #5 intersection. Although the final traffic analysis from Benshoof and Associates is not complete, it can he expected that the upgrading of County Road #4 and the County Road .14 and Highway 5 intersection will be needed not only for Fairfield, hut also as an overall community benefit. Traffic Traffic from Phase 1 of the Fairfield project will have only incremental effects on County Road #4, and improvements would not be necessary. Although the final results of the traffic study are not completed, we expect that County Road #4 will need to be upgraded as soon as possible because of the total number of units in Fairfield and adjacent future development. The intersection at County Road #4 and Highway #5 will be under construction and substantially complete in 1990. Benshoof and Associates have indicated to City Staff that Scenic Heights Road will be a major component of the overall collector road system in Southwest Eden Prairie. This road system is intended to handle more traffic than the minor collectors proposed as part of the Fairfield project. Since the east/west collector road in the Fairfield project is not proposed to handle substantial traffic, it would be important that Scenic Heights Road he completed early with the subsequent phases of Fairfield so that its use as a collector is established very early on in the residents traffic habits. The distance between the north/south collector road intersection at Scenic Heights Road and the railroad crossing is 150 feet. This intersection should be moved approximately 150 feet further to the east to provide for additional stacking of vehicles. Conchs i ons The Planning Commission should decide if compelling reasons have been provided for change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan from Industrial to Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential. The change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan does not affect the Guide Plan balance appreciably and although portions of the site would he guided Medium Density Residential, the density, at 3.1 units per acre is low considering that the Guide Plan designation from Medium Density would allow up to 10 units per acre. Impacts on the site's natural features are minimal and overall tree loss at 31% and compares favorably to tree loss in other residential subdivisions. There are pros and cons for the use of R1-9.5 lots. The use of R1-9.5 lots can provide an alternative lifestyle, variety to the subdivision, small, private open spaces for recreational use and affordable housing. On the other hand, the size of the RI-9.5 neighborhood is large at 154 units on 49.5 acres and the overall visual density of the project appears tight. If the Commission concurs with this, the alternative ways of reducing the visual density of the project would be to remove units and comply with the minimum requirements of the R1-9.5 zoning district, two, add more R1-13.5 lots to the subdivision, or three, create individual neighborhoods with a distinctive architectural theme such that the RI-9.5 area would appear as a collection of smaller individual neighborhoods. Fairfield Planned Unit Development 5 August 19, 1988 The Planning Commission must also decide whether or not there are benefits to the City from PUD waivers for lot size and street frontage. Since the rezoning for Phases 2-6 should not occur until after the results of the Southwest engineering study are known and PUD waivers are tied to zoning, no PUD waivers can be granted at this time. However, since the Planning Commission is requested to act on the concept, an indication should be made as to whether or not in principle the waivers are appropriate. The potential for environmental impact, as identified in the Staff Report, may be impacts on the adjoining road systems. Findings of potential significant impact should indicate that detailed approvals for rezoning for Phases 2-6 should be predicated upon the completion of required road improvements as identified in the Southwest Area engineering study. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS If the Planning Commission feels that the revisions to the overall PUD are acceptable and that compelling reasons have been made substantiating the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Industrial to Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential , then approval of the Fairfield project should be predicated upon the following: 1. A revised concept plan to reduce the overall visual density by any or all of the following: a. Comply with minimum R1-9.5 zoning requirements for lot size and street frontage. b. Add more R1-13.5 lots. c. Create individual neighborhoods with a distinctive architectural theme such that the R1-9.5 area would appear as a collection of smaller neighhorhoods. 2. PUD waivers for lot size and street frontage are acceptable in principle, however, the final decision on the granting of such waivers would occur concurrent with PUD District Review, supplemental to rezoning. 3. A revised plan which shifts the location of the intersection of the north/south collector road and Scenic Heights Road approximately 150 feet to the east. 4. Submittal of a tree replacement plan for approximately 690 inches prior to Council review. 5. Rezoning and PUD District Review with waivers for street frontage and lot size for Phases 2-6 should be reviewed subsequent to the completion of the Southwest Area Phasing Plan and subject to the following conditions: A. Incorporation into the final plans for preliminary plat the required improvements to be identified in the Southwest Eden Prairie Phasing ' plan. ,.)i/ Ll.J Fairfield Planned Unit Development 6 August 19, 1988 B. Phasing for future development in Phases 2-6 would be predicated on the results of the Southwest Eden Prairie Phasing Plan. C. The construction of Scenic Heights Road to be completed early in the development phasing of the property. 6. A finding of potential significant impact on County Road #4 and the County Road #4 and Highway #5 intersection. Phasing of the project should be tied to the required road improvements as identified in the final traffic analysis by Benshoof and Associates. • a110 / / / / 1 / . / .•'/ II •�• 'e°uN V^r •eUf" A NI I NMI I NM II MN km Sy � .r I ,,FN.EAs 4 300—` uENf A. 113 0.0 ,a, HEIGHTS--��ROAD....... . 16 oo•r ' -g aaso 9.500 15.9nn Si 31 90 1 -LA....,I J 18 N t 13,•0ot( vi:6sr 1or11 oA�f,, ,),0 Jflti al f` \0T rt 12 4'1)04,^ I_1 1 D 055 V' ''./' ' 1 ,_. 6 5 IN 4 d 3 m 2 y 1 ~ 9.ZOO 3r o,\y}o01 a 4. ` Fl IM 80 // 14�� .IS 1 r'I .6.9e0Dsr ryry i ,,,,x,a{o)unf.O„tLOr.'•0„o ,y.'.i —F5�__ l0� / Sa +.900a. d a 90 1J I '7 17 u S..0,,\ as fF 70 '1$t !i \03 B�O. ,, 'i 8 loco0 _ n1 500 f. y0o le o S `% .. 19tm s' 7� ` 1 nY y' JO / U r1 � ,o-flTsdos� 1�0:°° np rs.° zz rot y si 15'\/ 0 10 ' �(2'r.1 r 1 — 10, a jo rrs vQ�--- a ir°.��>0 No \ S F.d00 /r e11 fr o-lo n se _ _ a"'o 3 4 p Q'�/ 68 5 0,J e�."' h YI n 14 s r �� ° 10 S 5 , 9S<Or Opt 79/ . I.. 8 h0 .. 6 8100ar \O.f00:.s pl ( '30 F ,0 °n9 e 0 b g°!3.° r ..at / 15,�. (y o \ io p 21 4.1,/.rs 1 s+s� 9; P \J 1S.”,os s16.// 000 It500 / d5 O °°B 9.e0n'i i rh aif Je0 \Ox aao,ano'I/. 60 \ . 5113� r _ II$ 0 I0300 ACOO so h r\o 8 105,- /''// 0,,fo°sr+ OUTLOT YO s5 --1 p ao sro 'SfOo °2 9.p00sr " x� e.eo0. �a • / > �- o l� \ a 6 5 4 Z '3;„r rioo 145 12 O r 0 9 00 1 -B) x0 2 03 ', L r 6/\ - IO AO 4) II � 9,•0o n �10r _ 6 s sr p `'0 10lm .00° s .0 >> 9.,99,•q.ao' '' I23 o M24 _25 1 14hn.'o$ 13 \I0500^r°\ 4 arq 1r F 1p/W 3e fr era Y 4,00 rp0 P R5S0�r 1i fpl II �r 05r //��c�B \\ O•00 r S 0 9.f00 1r50 .'b{r '1.500 ¢Ooff !/ ".50Vfr 'awi 0 e, 8f,jr °1 e,s0°a. 63All . g0'Ic 1 0 9ac iM �s //u/`FO/ 4 • 22 �o I I 2 c 3 `'S0O Si / '" f r On5�4 3�`,/9 i ✓✓✓9 7, V eis .J ':.:-.4., , ^,.1.,soor r`'roo2''' Yr-�_IIB 'o.\ ''' s0rr pp��t0 9.5Sr 7xf Ii 9e0°lr , 'Ss B0 01' 5> '�♦ /�1 8e 'y 1 Jy Or 6 rr/fr 2 -19 . V .000 If) IP .0 \..C).`< �9,s1 , i rla90oar ,R�e2�`n tro0sr 3 n0 9m � \°Y / ,17 is \e� 2 11,E rAm.r'` ra.tir �p� YI II / Off ` `n6r 20 1 I i} I a is / —I I .I '..I ,____IS.s • • Relocated Collector Road and Scenic Heights Road Intersection Eden I'raine Planning Commission Niccfing Mimics August 22, I988 . P;igc 2 IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. FAIRFIELD PHASES 2 THROUGH 6, by Tandem Properties. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Industrial to Medium Density Residential on 49.5 acres and from Industrial to Low Density Residential on 24.4 acres.Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 148.2 acres,Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers for street frontage and lot size on 148.2 acres,Zoning District Change from Rural to R1.9.5 on 92.7 acres and from Rural to R1-13.5 on 53.6 acres,Preliminary Plat of 148.2 acres into 367 single family lots,28 outlots and road right-of-way,review of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet for construction of a residential development. Location: West of County Road 4,southeast of the Minneapolis and St.Louis Railroad. A continued public hearing. Franzen reported that Phase 1 of the Fairfield project had been approved by the City Council. Phase 2 to 6 were continued by the Planning Commission pending receipt of the Southwest Area Plan. He continued that although the study was not completed,there was adequate information, and plan modification to complete the review of the PUD Concept,the Guide Plan Change and the EAW,with rezoning and timing of the implementation of the development subject to City engineering study prior to final adoption. Franzen stated that the proponent made the recommended changes in response to the June 24, 1988,Staff Report as follows: 1)Revised plans to'reduce the overall tree loss to 32%or approximately 1,300 caliper inches;2)If anticipated higher traffic volumes result on east/west collector roads,cul-de-sacs would be provided for safer access;3)Revised the plans to show sidewalks and trails as recommended by the Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Department: 4)Provided additional right-of-way along Scenic Heights Road for future extension;5)Revised plans to allow access to the school site;and 6)Moved the intersection of the north/south collector road and Scenic Heights Road 150 ft.further east. Franzen stated that the remaining issue was the overall visual density of the R1-9.5 area. He offered three alternatives,one or all: a)Comply with minimum R1-9.5 zoning requirements for lot size and street frontage;b Add more R1.13.5 lots; and/or c)Create individual neighborhoods with a distinctive architectural theme such that the R1.9.5 area would appear as a collection of smaller neighborhoods. Jim Ostenson of Tandem Corporation,gave a brief background on the location of the project. He stated that to comply with the Staff Report some lots were taken out and others made wider and they were in agreement with the staff recommendations. He added that when the Brauer Study was completed,they would return to the Commission for rezoning,and PUD waivers for lot size and street frontage. Hallett inquired if the residents who attended the last meeting in reference to this project,had been contacted about this meeting. Franzen replied he had been contacted by Steve Wagner who asked what action was up for consideration. Franzen stated he told Wagner that the Guide Plan Change was being considered and Franzen asked him if he any comments or concerns about that issue. Wagner stated that he did not object to the Guide Plan Change. Franzen inferred that he was concerned with the traffic on County Road#4 and how many uses would have to be built before improvements were made to the road. Hallett inquired if Scenic Heights Road would be addressed in the Southwest Study. Franzen replied affirmatively. Ruebling asked proponent if he was in general agreement with the staff recommendations. He replied all but one issue has been resolved and that was the visual impact on density.He illustrated their plan for three separate neighborhoods of large lots,medium lots and cluster homes. They feel three separate areas would alleviate the visual impact. Eden I'nme Planning Commission Mecung Minutes August 22,1')88 ' Pagc 3 Hallett inquired as to the number of variances. Franzen replied that it was due to the cluster lots and the minimum size lot being less than 9500 sq.ft.for 33 lots. Anderson felt that this part of Eden Prairie should be as diverse as other parts. Fell was in agreement with the project. Dodge was concerned about the variances and a big home being built on a small lot. Franzen replied that with the variances at 9500 sq.ft.,open space is provided and grading is limited,as a trade off for variances. He added that in the cluster area,given the past history of Centex,it would be unlikely that large homes would be built on cluster lots. Hallett stated the developer had an excellent track record and he would be in agreement because he knew that the developer would have control. Ruebling was hesitant on lot size variances. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Anderson and seconded by Ruebling to close the public hearing on the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and Planned Unit Development Concept for Fairfield Phases 2-6. Motion carried 6-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Anderson and seconded by Ruebling to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Tandem Properties for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Industrial to Medium Density Residential on 49.5 acres,and from Industrial to Low Density Residential on 24.4 acres for Fairfield Phases 2-6,based on plans dated August 18,1988,subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report,dated August 19,1988. Motion carried 6-0-0 MOTION 2a: Motion was made by Anderson and seconded by Ruebling to clarify approval of the plans as proposed with the condition of Item C which was to reduce the overall visual density of the project through creating individual architectural themes of individual neighborhoods. Motion carried 6-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Anderson and seconded by Ruebling to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Tandem Properties for Planned Unit Development Concept on 148.2 • acres for the Fairfield Development,Phases 2-6,based on plans dated August 19,t 988,subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 19,1988. • Motion carried 6-0-0 MOTION 4: Motion was made by Anderson and seconded by Ruebling to recommend to the City Council a finding of no significant impact for the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the Fairfield • Phases 2-6 development based on revised plans dated August 19,1988. Motion carried 6-0-0 12) Eden Prairie Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 22,1988 Page 4 r . MOTION 5: Motion was made by Anderson and seconded by Ruebling to continue the public hearing for Fairfield Phases 2-6 for Planned Unit Development District Review,Zoning District Change and Preliminary Plat to the September 26,1988,Planning Commission meeting,pending receipt and analysis of the Southwest Area Study, Motion carried 6-0-0 a, s • APPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. July 18, 1988 -2- Cook agreed that a banner is an important sign of the participant's efforts, but he is against having banners displayed in the lobby. MOTION: Baker moved to recommend that banners be allowed only inside the ice arena or pool areas to recognize achievements made by home teams and not allowed in the lobby of the Community Center. Cook seconded the motion and it passed 4-0. V. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. Fairfield by Tandem Corporation Refer to memo dated July 12, 1988 from Barb Cross, Landscape Architect and staff reports dated May 6 and June 24, 1988. Tom Boise, President of Centex Homes, was present at the meeting to review the development. The site is located on 148 acres west of County Road 4, south of Highway 5 and north of County Road 1, east of the railroad tracks. 367 single family lots are proposed with three different housing styles. Phases 2 thru 6 of this project are on hold at this time pending the completion of the Southwest Eden Prairie Phasing Plan for roads and utilities. Barb Cross said that tree loss will be zpproximately 33% or 799 caliper inches. ' Average tree loss for other residential projects has been 27% and this project is close to the average. Tree inventory submitted to the City was estimated at 36%; however, the Planning staff estimates tree loss to be closer to 55% and has asked the developer to minimize tree loss by providing larger and wider lots and realigning several sections or roadway. The pedestrian system which is recommended is a 5' sidewalk and 8' bituminous trail along either side of both the north/south and east/west collector streets within the development. In addition, staff recommends an outlot between houses providing access to the school be 40' wide. The outlot with an 8' trail leaves 16' on either side for berming. Also, staff recommends that the developer dedicate the 100 year floodplain to the City so the area can be protected. Baker asked if the road connection will be a joint effort between the school and the City. Barb said this is school property, not City property. Cook asked about the pond shown on the site. Barb said this looks larger on the map than it actually is, but it is recommended that in order to provide access along the north side of the pond to the future neighborhood park, an outlot 20' wide above the high water mark should be dedicated to the City. 0,1 APPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. July 18, 1988 -3- Richard said that the trails between these homes will be heavily used as an access to the school and he questions whether they will be wide enough. Barb said this will not be the only access to the school. There will also be a collector street which can be used. Baker asked what the minimum setback is. Lambert said it is the same as any other lot line which is 10' or 15'. MOTION: Cook moved to recommend approval of Fairfield per staff recommendations. Baker seconded the motion and it passed 4-0. VI. OLD BUSINESS A. Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Recommendations Refer to memo dated June 20, 1988 from Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources. The City received a letter from Don Brauer representing Flagship Athletic Club requesting that the obstruction in Purgatory Creek which occurred during the 1985 construction season be removed. This obstruction has caused additional work for Flagship and also endangers existing homes should a flood occur. Lambert recommended a number of steps be followed which have been approved by the City Council. The first step is to review the study on the entry points for the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area and authorizing staff to negotiate acquisition of the preferred entry point. Secondly, authorize staff to negotiate an agreement with each landowner to donate their land for park purposes on a contract for deed. Cook said he feels the schedule and timetable for this project is what is needed to get this project off the ground and he commended Lambert for his efforts. MOTION: Cook moved to recommend supporting the Purgatory Creek Park development schedule. Joyer seconded the motion and it passed 4-0. B. M.C.A. Alternate Park Entrance Location Study Refer to memo dated July 13, 1988 from Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources. Lambert said that the north study area is the preferred site and staff recommends authorization to negotiate with the property owners for both sites and get soil borings if necessary before a report is brought back recommending a particular site. 2 fl(io CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-210 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and, WHEREAS, the proposal of Chestnut Place Partners for development of Chestnut Place for Neighborhood Commercial use requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: approximately 1.69 acres located at the northeast corner of Anderson Lakes Parkway and Chestnut Drive be modified from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 20th day of Septebmer, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk an-) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #88-211 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CHESTNUT PLACE FOR CHESTNUT PLACE PARTNERS BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Chestnut Place for Chestnut Place Partners, dated September 14, 1988, consisting of 1.69 acres into one lot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 20th day of September, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 2 111 STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: August 19, 1988 PROJECT: Chestnut Place Neighborhood Commercial Center LOCATION: Northwest quadrant of the intersection of Chestnut Drive and Anderson Lakes Parkway APPLICANTS: Chestnut Place Partners Sid Bader (Z & S Management Company) REQUEST: 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. 2. Zoning District Change from RM-2.5 to Neighborhood Commercial on 1.69 acres. 3. Preliminary Platting of 1.69 acres into one lot. Background —� \ :.�., This site is currently guided Medium Density for up to 10 units ' '~per acre. • - i Surrounding land uses are guided Medium Density to the north, south, it, \ r' east, and west of this site. The 7-",RD �+ site is currently zoned RM-2,5, a }-�t This site is a lot remnant from 40 T` ""O •"' acres of land developed by Z & $ ` s ,r���:` Construction for the Parkway Apart- � . ments. The lot remnant was created by the alignment of the Anderson *to ` , Lakes Parkway. ' Comprehensive Guide Plan Change �� r .,. The Comprehensive Guide Plan suggest ``'"'`°' , < p 99est �!�'� 'M. - 10-15 Neighborhood Commercial sites PROPOSED`SITE • �y to serve the community. The Corn- �"' ' . 'r prehensive Guide Plan does not rv' #` '. �, :-L%, �' `'1 ,? specifically identify Neighborhood _ ;.; �'-' ���; Commercial sites since Neighborhood 5 Commercial areas are developed on ..irl.:.:TS / %y,�,._- the basis of demand and the size of I '"- -,�,�� AREA LOCATION MAP F' • Chestnut Place 2 August 19, 1988 the service area. In general, Neighborhood Commercial provides daily goods and services for a service area of 1 to 11/2 miles. The nearest Neighborhood Commercial center to this site is the Anderson Lakes Shopping Center on Highway 0169 and Anderson Lakes Parkway. This shopping center is slightly over a mile away. The Anderson Lakes Shopping Center serves a portion of the land area west of Highway 0169, but is intended primarily to serve areas to the east of Highway ff169. The proposed Neighborhood Commercial site on Chestnut Drive would serve primarily a large area to the west. This would be south of Scenic Heights, east of County Road 04, and north of County Road 01. Approximately 1,500 housing units exist within a 1 to 11/2 mile radius to the west of this site. Site Plan The site plan depicts the construction of 8,320 square feet of building area on 1.69 acres of land at a Floor Area Ratio of 0.11. For neighborhood commercial zoning, the ordinance would allow up to a 0.2 FAR. A total of 66 parking spaces are required to meet Code. The plan depicts 34 actual parking spaces and 32 proof-of- parking spaces. The plan, as proposed, meets the minimum setback requirements for building and parking. Architecture The building will he constructed out of brick, glass, and wood. The plan, as proposed, depicts an approved materials calculation of 67%. The ordinance would require the building to be at least 75% facebrick and glass. The proposed one-story building will be residential in character with a pitched roof. Use of a staggered roofline and dormers help break up the overall length of the building and add visual interest. The rear side of the building will not have any loading facilities, doors, trash enclosures, or lighting. This is important as a transition to the multiple family buildings immediately to the west. Plant materials are used within the setback area to soften the view of the wall. Any power boxes, meters, transformers, and refuse areas should be screened from public roads and the adjoining multiple family units in a manner architecturally integral with the building. This screening plan should be provided prior to Council review. The proponent has not identified the exterior materials at this time. The Staff would suggest that colors for the building be compatible with the colors on the adjoining apartment complexes which would be a warm to medium dark brown brick. The proponent should provide samples of the proposed exterior materials and a color board scheme, prior to review by the City Council. Grading The overall site is relatively level and grading required is to provide a level pad area for the building and parking. Berming is provided along Chestnut Drive and Anderson Lakes Parkway to screen parking areas. Berming along Anderson Lakes Parkway is minimal within the 17.5-foot setback, and screening will rely more heavily on the use of plant materials. • Landscaping Chestnut Place 3 August 19, 1988 Landscaping The landscape plan, as proposed, meets the minimum City Code requirements for landscaping. A total of 126 caliper inches are provided on-site. Utilities Sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer, are available to this site along Anderson Lakes Parkway. Trails There is an existing five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Anderson Lakes Parkway. Lighting Since this site is adjacent to a residential area, the lighting should be a maximum of 20 feet in height and downcast luminars. There should be no lighting on the rear of the buildings because of the proximity to the multiple family units to the west. Signage The signage proposal is weak and is not defined by criteria. In the absence of criteria, signs are reviewed on a case by case basis, are difficult to administer, and often leads to a hodge podge of colors, shapes, and sizes. It is important for the developer to establish and commit to signage criteria. The following criteria should be included as a condition of approval of the project: 1. Provide an architecturally defined signage area by color, texture, materials and dimensions. 2. Lettering shall be individual letters and internally lit. 3. Lettering should either be a common style or color. Preliminary Plat The Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District has a minimum lot size of 2 acres. The size of the proposed lot is 1.69 acres. The proponent must apply for and receive a variance for lot size from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. Conclusions The decision to change the Comprehensive Guide Plan is dependent upon whether or not compelling reasons have been made for changing the plan. If the site was developed in terms of the Comprehensive Guide Plan, a total of 17 housing units could be built. Given the poor soil conditions in the southern half of the property, development would be on the north end similar to the commercial proposal. Since the site is long and narrow, a 17-unit, 2-story building would likely be built. The size of this building would approximate the foot print for the neighborhood shopping center. Given the parking requirements for garage and on grade surface parking, the intensity of the plan, if developed at medium density residential, would be_ comparable to the intensity of development for the proposed shopping center plan. 2 IG� Chestnut Place 4 August 19, 1988 Commission may wish to taKe into consideration the following reasons for changing the Comprehensive Guide Plan: 1. There are no other Neighborhood Commercial uses within one mile of this site. 2. The site is being developed at a low Floor Area Ratio of 0.1; the Code would allow up to a 0.2 Floor Area Ratio. 3. The building is one-story, low profile, and residential in character. 4. The intensity of site development, as proposed, would be comparable to Medium Density Residential at 10 units per acre. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Staff presents the following alternative courses of action: 1. If the Planning Commission feels that compelling reasons have been made for changing the Comprehensive Guide Plan from Medium Density Residential to Commercial, then one option would be to recommend approval of the Rezoning and Platting on 1.69 acres for an 8,300 square foot Neighborhood Commercial Center. This would be based on recommendations in the Staff Report dated August 19, 1988, and based on plans dated July 28, 1988, and subject to the following: A. Prior to City Council review, proponent shall: 1. Modify the architectural elevations to meet the City ordinance requirements for 75% face brick, glass, or better. • 2. Provide an overall signage plan with signage criteria. 3. Provide a screening plan for trash, meters, transformers, and power boxes. 4. Provide samples of proposed exterior building materials. B. Prior to final plat approval proponent shall: 1. Provide detailed utility, storm water run-off, and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. 2. Provide detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. C. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall: 1. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee. 2. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in • advance of grading. 9,rn Chestnut Place 5 August 19, 1988 3. Provide plans for review by the Fire Marshal. 4. Provide examples of proposed exterior building materials for review. 5. Provide an overall lighting plan with details for review. D. Receive Board of Appeals approval for the lot size variance less than 2 acres. 2. If the Planning Commission feels that compelling reasons have not been made for changing the Comprehensive Guide Plan and that the impacts on the adjoining land uses are high, then one option would be to recommend denial of the project as proposed. The Planning Staff would recommend Alternative #1. • ":dud Lien Pcimc Planning Commission!Sleeting Minutes August 22. 1988 Page 5 C. CHESTNUT PLACE by Chestnut Place Partners. Request for Guide Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial on 1.69 acres,Zoning District Change from Rural to N-Com on 1.69 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals,Preliminary Plat of 1.69 acres into 1 lot for construction of a 8,208 square foot commercial center. Location: Northeast corner of Anderson Lakes Parkway and Chestnut Drive. A public hearing. Franzen reported that the proponent was requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. He indicated the Commission that the Guide Plan did not identify Neighborhood Commercial sites as they are developed on the basis of demand and the size of the service area. The proposed commercial center is slightly over one mile away from the nearest neighborhood commercial center. The proponent described the proposed complex as being in the middle of a residential area. The project has approximately 8000 sq.ft.,and a total of 66 parking spaces would be required. The plan presented depicted 34 actual parking spaces and 32 proof-of-parking spaces. The rear side of the Eden Prairie Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 22, 19F5 Page 6 building would not have any loading facilities,doors,trash enclosures or lighting. The complex would blend with the residential neighborhood,and there would be no roof-top mechanical equipment. it would be screened at the rear of the building. Anderson questioned the 21'clearing and the traffic flow around the gas pumps.He felt double parking would most likely occur at the pumps,therefore creating a traffic bottle neck for vehicles. He asked if the gas pumps could be relocated to improve internal circulation. • Fell stated that this was not just a drive lane for the gas station but for the entire facility. He indicated that pedestrian and auto traffic should be separate. Fell commented that overall parking would be adequate,and asked about the apartment residents access. Proponent replied that sidewalks would be in place for that purpose. Hallett inquired if the owners of the building were notified. Franzen stated the owners were notified but not the renters. Hallett suggested that the Human Rights Commission be consulted regarding renters rights. Hallett inquired to Staff how many superettes this would make for Eden Prairie. Franzen replied that • this would be the fifth one. Ruebling inquired about the signage,and Franzen replied that a 14'high sign was being proposed. Hallett inquired of the other businesses planned for the site. Proponent replied that a dry cleaning business,video,pizza,sun-tanning,barber shop and sit-down restaurant were being considered. Fell asked if the traffic was addressed and where the access points were from the intersection. Hallett asked if site vision distances were adequate. Franzen responded that these would be reviewed prior to City Council review. He added that staff would investigate the possibility of closing the driveway access closest to Chestnut on Anderson Lakes Parkway and build the driveway off Chestnut Drive and provide a better internal by-pass lane to improve site access and internal circulation. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Ruebling to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Chestnut Place Partners for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial on 1.69 acres for Chestnut Place for construction of an 8,208 sq.t.commercial center,based on plans dated August 3,1988,subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 19,1988,and 1)move the pumps for pedestrian safety;2)sidewalks and pedestrian access along Chestnut and Anderson Lakes Parkway;3)lighting modified;4)public safety looked at and reviewed;5)hours of operation defined before going to City Council;and 6)clarification of signage. Motion carried 5-1-0,opposed by Anderson. • Anderson opposed due to safety caused by location of pumps in traffic lanes. Hallett agreed and changed his vote. Proponent stated they will look in to an alternative circulation plan to reduce conflicts with cars and pedestrians. Motion carried 4-2-0,opposed by Anderson and Hallett. L1jtr Eden Prairie Planning Commission Meeting Minuses August 22, 1988 Page 7 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Ruebling to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Chestnut Place Partners for Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial on 1.69 acres,with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, for Chestnut Place for construction of an 8,208 sq.ft.commercial center,based on plans dated August 3,1988,subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 19, 1988. Motion carried 4-2-0,opposed by Anderson and Hallett. MOTION 4: Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Ruebling to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of the request of Chestnut Place Partners for Preliminary Plat of 1.69 acres into one lot for Chestnut Place for construction of an 8,208 sq.ft.commercial center,based on plans dated August 3, 1988,subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 19,1988. Motion carried 4-2.0,opposed by Anderson and Hallett. V. OLD BUSINESS Anderson suggested that Commission not introduce agenda items after 11:00 p.m. He felt it was not fair to the residents,nor could the Commission act in a professional manner or make professional judgements at that hour. He was agreeable to starting earlier or holding additional meetings. Bye suggested the Commission members make motions to help move the meeting along. The consensus was that the residents have to right to have their comments as a part of public record. Ruebling suggested a time limit on discussion. When a project did not have an agreeable conclusion it would be suggested that it be continued in deference to the other items on the agenda. Some Commission members stated they would rather hash out the problems than to continue the proposal and further backlog the calendar. VI. NEW BUSINESS On September 19th at 6:30 p.m.the Southwest Area Study would be presented and discussed. The Hustad Company would be holding a neighborhood meeting at City Hall for Bluff Country Corners sometime this fall. Commission and Council and Staff are invited to attend and participate. VII. PLANNER'S REPORT Franzen reported on the items scheduled for September 12,1988,Planning Commission meeting. VIII.ADJOURNMENT MOTION Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to adjourn the meeting at 10:20 p.m. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-200 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 9th day of August, 1988 fixed the 20th day of September as the date for a public hearing on the following proposed improvements: I.C. 52-149 (Construction of watermain in Pioneer Trail (CSAH 1) from Mitchell Road to approximately 1850 feet west) WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the Council hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held on the 20th day of September at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 2. The City Engineer is hereby designed as the Engineer for this project and is hereby directed to prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement, with the assistance of R.C.M., consulting engineers. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 20, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION ND. 88-201 VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT IN LOT 1, BLOCK 1 NORSEMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 5TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain drainage and utility easement described as follows: The westerly five feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Norseman Industrial Park 5th Addition as recorded in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 20, 1988, after due notice was published and posted as required by law; WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said drainage and utility easement is not necessary and have no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated. NOW, THEREFDRE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 1. Said drainage and utility easement as above described are hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a Notice of Completion of the proceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 20, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk SEPTEMBER 20,1998 45370 UPPER MIDWEST REGIONAL CONFERENCE CONFERENCE-PLANNING DEPT 45371 MINNEGASCO SERVICE 70.00 45372 NSP SERVICE 20.70 5373 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 30.61 45374 SUFPLEE'S 7 HI ENTERPRISES INC SEPTEMBER 88 RENT LIQUOR STORE 50.92 45575 THE BANK OF ELK RIVER EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 4629.67 45376 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIAT CITY'S PORTION OF 1998 FIRE PENSION 2.00 45377 PETTY CASH EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 9 652.78 2 45379 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-BUSINESS MAILING-FALL BROCHURE .04 45379 MINNESOTA TWINS 2 .0 45:90 NFPA SPECIAL EVENT-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 15353.00 45391 OUR DESIGNS FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 236.85 45391 PETTY CAH FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 254.88 CHANGE FUND-SUNBONNET DAY 50.00 45733 PETTY CASH CHANGE FUND-SUNBONNET DAY 2 45794 SUNSET PRINTING & ADVERTISING FIRE PR'VENTION SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 600 45.35 MINNEGASCO 155..00 SERVICE 161.19 45396 PETTY CASH 45;•87 SUE LANE EXPENSES-CITY HALL 63.75 SUPPLIES-ELECTIONS 43.96 45789 MINNEGASCO SERVICE 45389 CITY OF NEW BRIGHTDN EXPENSES COUNC 1272.28 45390 JIM STUKEL BOUNDARY 12.00 BOUNDARY WATERS CANOE TRIP/FEES PAID 825.00 45391 POLAROID CORPORATION CAMERA REPAIR-POLICE DEPT 31 45792 ASSOCIATION OF MN COUNTIES CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES 45.00 45397 HENNEPIN PARKS CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES 50.00 45394 ANDROC PRODUCTS INC CHEMICALS-PARE: MAINTENANCE 50.00 45C95 MOTOROLA INC -13 PORTABLE RADIOS/13 MICROPHONES/13 575 -RADIO CHARGERS/13 CASES/43 BELT LOOPS- " 05..75 -£11043.00-POLICE FORFEITURE-DRUGS/2 -MOBILE RADIOS & INSTALLATION-34001.75/20 -PAGERS & CHARGERS-£9380.00/SPEAKER-FIRE DEPT 45596 MOTOROLA, INC. RADIO REPAIR-FIRE DEPT 45397 SHAKOPEE FORD INC -CABLE/BELT ASSEMBLY/EQUIPMENT REPAIR- l552.35 6 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 52.35 45398 FRED PRYOR SEMINAR CONFERENCE-STREET DEPT 45399 COUNCIL ON EDUC IN MGt1T CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES 198.00 45400 ICMA SCHOOL FIRE DEPT 195.00 45401 INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL EXCHANGE CONFERENCE-COUNCILMEMBERS 198.75 45402 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES CONFERENCE COUNCILMEMBERS 543.00 45403 NORTH CENTRAL SECTIDN AWWA CONFERENCE-WATER DEPT 1055.00 45404 JIM STUKEL BOUNDARY WATERS CANOE TRIP/FEES PAID '05.00 45405 JIM STUKEL BOUNDARY WATERS CANOE TRIP/F 47.50 45406 ANESHA DAVIS REFUND-YOUTH MEMBERSHIPS/SWIMMING A LESSONS 15. 0 45407 LMCIT LIABILITY INSURANCE-CITY HALL 448 .60 45408 LAURIE LORENCE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 00.58 45409 ELIZABETH WATSON REFUND-DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS 15.25 45410 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 7.00 45411 ASSOCIATION OF MN COUNTIES CONFERENCE-ADMINISTRATION 3644.15 45412 CITY-COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 9/2/99 45.00 45413 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 9/2/98 1226.00 45414 CROW WING COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 10238.68 45415 FEDEPAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 9/2/88 252.00 45416 GPEAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 9/2/99 50716.51 4021.00 45417 GUARANTEE MUTUAL LIFE COMPANY SEPTEMBER 88 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM 23- 9 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 1'4a 211.00 24758286 SEPTEMBER 20,1998 45419 ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION PAYROLL 9/2/88 45420 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG SEPTEMBER 88 UNION DUES 1184.248 45421 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC SEPTEMBER B8 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM12208.7008.70 5422 MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE 45423 NORWEST BANK HOPKINS PAYROLLSAYER 8/1988 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM 2301.36 45424 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA & q/2/66 900.00 45425 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL9/2/88 24490.10 B 45426 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN SEPTEMBER SEPTEMBERBB LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM 90.00 45426 UNITED WAY SEPTEMBER 88 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM 19782.17 PAYROLL 9/2/BB 211.50 4542E VOID OUT CHECK 45429 MN DEPT OF P/S MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION 5000 .75 45430 BEER WHOLESALERS INC BEER 2 . 45431 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 5423.80 45432 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER 7964.17 45433 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 22800.60 45434 MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 531.12 45435 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIX 20091.48 45436 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MIX 811.05 45437 R C BEVERAGE TWIN CITIES MIX 395.05 4543B THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 195.65 45439 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE MIX 24051.56 45440 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 21.42 45441 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 2076.92 45442 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR WINE9384.26 45443 PAUSTIS & SONS CO WINE I4173.48 45444 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 151.50 45445 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 6993.98 45446 QUALITY NINE CO WINE 1804.83 "447 THE WINE COMPANY WINE 81.007475.0 448 KEVIN BADENHOP TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 45449 JULIE BAKER TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 35.75 45450 CHANTELLE BAUCHER TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 28.60 45451 BRENT BUSSEY TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 28.60 45452 RUTH CARR TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 95.98 45453 MEGAN CHARLTON TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 26.00 45454 ROY COLEMAN TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 44.00 45455 JESSE DAVEY TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 64.35 45456 ROBBIE JOHNSON TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 62.50 45457 ALLISON LDCKE TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 11.00 45458 TERRI LANGER TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 79.50 45459 MATT MOOREHEAD TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 64.35 45460 KATIE PATTYN TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 28.60 45461 BETH REMETA TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 42.08 45462 JACKI REMETA TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 100.10 45463 GERALO RDGERS TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 107.25 45464 TIM RONHOVOE TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 14.00 45465 BARBAROSSA & SONS INC SERVICE WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDITION 4.30 45466 KEN INC SERVICE-BLUFFS EAST 4TH ADDITION �6687.26 45467 RICHARD h:NUTSON INC SERVICE-OLD SHADY OAK & ROWLAND ROAD 11933.59 45468 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION SERVICE-FRANLO ROAD 1933.59 45469 NODLAND CDNSTRUCTION -SERVICE-HIDDEN GLEN 3RD ADDITION/WYNDHAM 5816.53 CREST 8176.53 45470 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO -SERVICE-MITCHELL/RESEARCH ROAD & WEST 76TH STREET 14166.49 T1 SHAW-LUNOOUIST ASSDC INC SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDITION 33785924 9159.00 SEPTEMBER 20,1989 45472 A B DICK CO XEROX PAPER-CITY HALL 45473 ACFO MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES CITY HALL 254.46 45474 AIRLIFT DOORS INC DOOR REPAIR-PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 239.I 234 7 15475 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO 00 45476 AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION VIDEO CART CITY HALL 45477 AMERICAN HIART SUPPLY CO WELLNESS PROGRAM SUPPLIES-HUMAN RESOURCES 270.00 CLEANING SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/UNIFORMS- 40.00 -WATER DEPT/STREET DEPT/SEWER DEPT/PARE; 1584.25 45478 MAINTENANCE/TOWELS-LIQUOR STORE AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC COMPUTER SOFTWARE-WATER DEPT 44,.00 45479 CPAIG W ANDERBERG HOCKEY & SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 1 45480 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC -SWING SEAT-PARK MAINTENANCE/CHANNEL POSTS 239.00 4548I MIF:E ANDERSON FORESTRY DEPT a5ae2 AQUA ENGINEERItlr, INC TENNIS TROPHIES-YOUTH TENNIS FLAGS-PARK MAINTENANCE6.68 4548:; ARTSIL•N MATERIALS CO -OFFICE SUPPLIES-PLANNING DEPT/COMMUNITY 8.72 CENTER 13.7� 45494 ASSOOCIATED ASPHALT INC BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE CABLE/KNOB/NUTS/TRUCK HOOD 3839.00- 5857.70 45485 ASTLEFORD INTL INC EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 857.70 45486 AUDIO INTELLIGENCE DEVICES -CAMERA LENS ADAPTOR-POLICE FORFEITURE D 66.83 RUGS 45487 B R W INC a5a88 BAF:ER ROAD DISTRIBUTING SERVICE-TRAFFIC SIGNALS IN MCA bI79.I0 45489 BAREREY SALES COMPANY INC HEATER CORE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE HOOF: HANGERS-FIRE DEPT 7 .00 45440 JEFF BARTZ SOFTBALL & VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 265.00 45491 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC 574.50 BATTERIES/ROTOR & HUB/DISTRIBUTOR CAP/ TIRE TUBE/MIRROR-EDUIFMENT MAINTENANCE ,77.06 45492 BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY -FI LM/F ILM PROCESSING-ENGINEERING DEPT/ 125.25 493 BkAUN ENG TESTING INC POLICE DEPT/PLANNING DEPT ,3494 BRO-TEX INC T MAINTENANCE SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW ROAD 665.70 TOWELS-EQUIPMEN 45495 MAXINE BRUECK 77,64 45496 BFYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC MILEAGE GRAVEL STREET MAINTENANCE/PARK MAINTENANCE 2656.19 45496 BSN CORP 45498 BUFTDW EQUIPMENT INC HOCKEY GOALS-PARE; MAINTENANCE I58.40 45499 TIM BUSHNELL CART-WATER DEPARTMENT HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 99•66 4550O BUSINESS CREDIT LEASING INC OCTOBER 88 COPIER RENTAL FIRE DEPT 21.00 45501 CARLSDNS LAKE STATE EQUIP CO -GEARSHIFT LEVER/O-RINGS/SWITCH/KNOBS-PARK 75 -MAINTENANCE/CENTER WHEEL/WHEEL RIM- 25 01 MAINTNANCE ENT 45502 CENTURION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC SQUADMCAR SETUP-POLICE DEPT 45503 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS 1780.00 45504 CHAPIN PUBLISHING COMPANY DIL/PLUGS WATER DEPT 45505 CHEMLAWN LEGAL ADS MCA TRAFFIC SIGNALS 13.34 45506 CLEVELAND COTTON PRODUCTS LAWN SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER 221.85 PAPER TOWELS WATER DEPT 100.00 45507 CLIMATE MAKERS INC 91.58 455U8 CMI REFRIGERATION BOILER REPAIR COMMUNITY CENTER 45509 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICE-HWYYR5F&PCOFRDD4/VALLEYUNITY CVIEWRRD 671.76 45510 CONCRETE RAISING INC 447.74 45510 CONSTRUCT ION MATERIALS INC CURBING-DRAINAGE CONTROL 71.76 PAVING BROOM/NAND EDGER/CEMENT CURB- 2568.75 45512 STREET MAINTENANCE 93.50 CONTACT MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INC -REMOVE & INSTALL RADIOS/POLICE DEPARTMENT 574.44 4551; COPY EQUIPMENT INC EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 14 CURTIS INMETRIE INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-ENGINEERING DEPT 3 GREASEFITTERS/WASHERS/RINGS/SCREWS/ .76 -CLEANING SUPPLIES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/ 9,68 3017097 .-, ,n n • 45515 CUTLER MAGNER COMPANY WATER DEPT 45516 DALCO QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 4942.95 -CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT/POLICE DEPT/ 1395.06 45517 MITCHELL J DEAN COMMUNITY CENTER MILEAGE-LIQUOR STORES 15.00 5519 DIAMOND ACCEPTANCE 45519 EUGENE DIETZ OCTOBER 88 COPIER INSTALLMENT-POLICE DEPT 300.00 45520 DIXIE CHEM INC AUGUST 88 EXPENSES-ENGINEERING DEPT L04.00 45521 DRISKILLSIXIEPETRO SUCEE VINOALU CHLORINE-WATER DEPT 2009.00 EXPENSES-CITY HALL/COMMUNITY CENTER 152.99 45522 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 45523 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 834.36 45524 DUSTCOATING INC OIL-DUST CONTROL 46.27 45525 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EXPENSES-ADMINISTRATIDN 3024.00 45526 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS MANHOLE COVER/CULVERT-STREET DEPT 4 37 45527 EMERGENCY SERVICE SYSTEMS -REPAIR GRILL LIGHT/REPAIR MASTER BATTERY .37 SWITCH-POLICE DEPT 60.22 45528 EMI INCORPORATED CHEMICAL FEEDER MIXER PROPELLER-WATER DEPT 182.57 45529 GEORGE ESBENSEN 9 POSTERS MOUNTED-FIRE DEPT 45570 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC WATER BASIN PLATE-STREET DEPT 81.00 45531 PETER FITCH HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 132.00 45532 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 1 .00 45523 G & K SERVICES -COVERALLS/TOWELS-WATER DEPT/PARK MAINT/ 1077.75 LIQUOR STORE 406.84 45534 GENERAL MACHINING INC SHAFT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 455:5 JOSEPH GLEASON HOCKEY & SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 11.00 1 45536 GOPHER OIL COMPANY OIL LIGHT-WATER DEPT 1.00 45537 ALAN D GRAY AUGUST 88 EXPENSES-ENGINEERING DEFT 52.30 45538 GROSS OFFICE SUPPLY OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 200.00 45539 HANSEN THORP PELLINEM OLSON INC -SERVICE-FRANLO RD/NEMEC KNOLLS/SOUTHWEST 153. 4 -STUDY AREA/BLUFF ROAD/COUNTY ROAD 4 WATER 29153.54 MAIN i 540 HARMON GLASS -SHADED WINDSHIELD-WATER DEPT/EQUIPMENT 2 MAINTENANCE 4 0.09 45541 HELLER'S CARBONIC WEST INC CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT 45542 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER FILING FEE-PLANNING DEPT 1133.98 45543 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER JULY 88 BOARD OF PRISONERS 294.00 45544 HERBST THUE & MATZ LTD SERVICE-4TH QUARTER 88-CABLE TV 2634.50 45545 D C HEY COMPANY INC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-WATER DEPT 2655.63 45546 HONEYWELL PROTECTION SERVICES -4TH QUARTER 88 SECURITY SYSTEM-SENIOR 75.00 75.00 CENTER 45547 MIKE HOSTETLER HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID • 45548 IBM CORPORATION OCTOBER 88 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 424.00 45549 INDEPENDENT SCHDOL GIST #272 -BUS SERVICE SPECIAL EVENTS COMMUNITY 24.32 1097,71 CENTER 45550 INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING SUPPLY INC BULBS-WATER DEPT 45551 INTERNATIONAL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL 142•68 45552 INTERNATIONAL PERSONNEL MANAGEMEN DUES-HUMAN RESOURCES 1122.50 455S3 ISS INTER SERVICE SYSTEM -SEPTEMBER 88 JANITORIAL SERVICE/SUPPLIES- 60.00 CITY HALL 1367.�0 45554 FF JEDLICKI INC -SERVICE-BACKHOE & OPERATOR-DRAINAGE CONTROL 13I2.50 45555 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC -OFFICE SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT/DESK/FILE CABINET-FIRE DEFT i46.58 45556 RONALD 0 JOHNSON MILEAGE/EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 5864068 228.09 • 1 SEPTEMBER 20,198E 45557 CARL JULLIE DUES-ADMINISTRATION 45559 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER 18.38 -EUL85/BATTERIES/DRILL PIT/HANGERS/TAPE/ 128.38 -PIPE/RIVET GUN/RIVETS/BOLTS/NUTS/WASHERS- WATER DEPT/BUILDING DEPT 45559 KLEVE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING AIR CONDITIONER REPAIR-OUTDOOR CENTER 141 45560 ROBERT LAMBERT -AUGUST BB EXPENSES-PARKS RECREATION & .00 21 NATURAL RESOURCES 8.00 45561 CYNTHIA LANENBERG MILEAGE-FIRE DEFT 39.25 45562 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD -LEGAL SERVICE-JUNE & JULY 88 FLYING CLOUD 9040.25 LANDFILL 45563 LESMANN ENTERPRISES INC -PAINT & REPAIR POLICE VEHICLES-EQUIPMENT 869.20 MAINTENANCE 45564 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC DICTAPHONE REPAIRR-CITY HALL 45565 LOIS LAYNE CREATIVE DESIGN500 -REMOVE & INSTALL DECALS ON 7 SCUAD CARS- 1751..00 POLICE DEPT 45566 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR INC BOBCAT BLADE-PARE; MAINTENANCE 45567 LOUISVILLE LANDFILL INC WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 114.00 45568 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT INC STREET VACUUM-SEWER DEPT 931.93 393 45569 MCFARLANES' INC CEMENT-STREET MAINTENANCE .00 45570 SUE MC CARVILLE MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 55.00 45571 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 15.00 45572 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC 6.53 EXPENSES-CITY HALL/COMMUNITY CENTER 48.07 45573 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT 51.1 45574 METRO ALARM INC -4TH QUARTER 88 ALARM SYSTEM-PUBLIC WORKS 78.00 BUILDING 45575 METRO PRINTING INC 45576 METROPOLITAN SENIOR FEDERATION BOOKS-SENIOR PROGRAMS DEPT 72.00 45577 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO 46.75 5 CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-ROUND LAKE PARK 114.45 578 MIDWAY TRANSFER INC FREIGHT CHARGE-POLICE FORFEITURE-DRUGS 210.00 579 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP/SEALCOATING-STREET MAINTENANCE 907.31 45580 MINNESOTA COMMUNICATIONS CORP -SEPTEMBER BB PAGER SERVICE-SEWER DEPT/ WATER DEPT/POLICE DEPT/FIRE DEPT 210.50 45581 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY FIRE COATS-FIRE DEPT 45582 MN FRAMES & PRINTS INC 3822.00 45583 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC ADVERTISING-LIQUORY STORESTH ENNIS 74.40 45584 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP SERVICE 255.60 45585 MINUTEMAN PRESS PRINTING-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION .20 45586 MODERN TIRE CO TIRE/WHEEL ALIGNMENT-FIRE DEPT 248.20 45597 MOTOROLA INC RADIO REPAIR-FIRE DEPT/POLICE DEPT 683.43 45588 MTI DISTIBUTING CO -BLADE/THROTTLE CONTROLS/HOSE-EQUIPMENT 88.93 1 MAINTENANCE/PARK MAINTENANCE 88.93 45589 MY CHEESE SHOP EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 45590 NATIONAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS REFUND-STARING LAKE PARK BUILDING 15 8.010 71 45591 NATIONAL SCREENPRINT -SWEATSUITS/POLO SHIRTS-TEEN WORK PROGRAM/ .0 COMMUNITY CENTER 7 .08 45592 NORTH STAR SOUND INC -SERVICE-PROPOSED AMPITHEATRE-STARING LAKE 70.00 PARK 45593 NAIL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN SUBSCRIPTION-FIRE DEPT 45594 NORWEST BANK MPLS NA BOND PAYMENT 12.50 45595 KATHLEEN A OARE NOTARY STAMP-POLICE DEPT 15483 .30 45596 KATHLEEN 0 CONNOR MILEAGE-FIRE DEPT 5.00 45597 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC HOOK-SEWER DEPT 7...7,, 45599 ORE:IN EXTERMINATING COMPANY INC SERVICE AUGUST & SEPTEMBER Be PEST 24.97 192.00 EXTERMINATING-FIRE DEPT T9 CONNIE L PETERS MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 18088699 18.25 • SEPTEMBER 20,1988 45600 PETTY CASH EXPENSES-CITY HALL 2 ADAPTOR/PIPE-POLICE 45601 POKORNY COMPANY 69.3PTOR/PIPE-POLICE BUILDING 1.35 45602 POMMER COMPANY INC PLAQUES/TROPHIES-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS ;5603 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC HEATER REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER 102.40 • 45604 PRAIRIE HARDWARE 27.43 -U BOLT/KEYS/PIPE WRENCH/BOLTS/COUPLERS/ 427.43 -TAPE/KNIVES/EYE HOOKS/CAULK/BRUSHES/BUL BS/ -PAINT/CHEESE CLOTH/UTILITY BLADES/PLUGS/ -HOSE/EXTENSION CORDS/HOSE/CONNECTORS- WATER DEPT 45605 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -FLYSWATTERS/MEASURING CUP/DRILL BIT/BOL TS 192.52 -WASHERS/SCREWS/NUTS/GLOVES/TROWELS/PAINT/ -PAINT BRUSHES/SPRAY ADHESIVE/CONTACT -CEMENT/MASKING TAPE/HANGERS-PARK MAINT! FORESTRY DEFT 45606 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -HANDLE/CHAIN/FASTENERS/SPRAY PAINT/FAIN T 190.64 BRUSHES/PAINT/CORKS-SEWER DEPT 45607 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -PAPER TOWELS/WRENCH/PLIERS/PLASTIC FORK S/ 172.49 -PAINT/PAINT THINNER/FUSES/SOLDERING GUN/ -SCREWS/LETTERS/CLEANING SUPPLIES-STREET DEPT 45608 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -FUNNEL/LAMP/BAYING SHEET/DUST PAN/KEYS/ 285.16 -PAINT/BUSHES/DUCT TAPE/SCREWS/WRENCHES; -BATTERIES/SWITCH/GLOVES/HOSES/NAILS/FACE MASKS/SPONGES-COMMUNITY CENTER 45609 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -SW ITCHES/KEYS/BATTERIES/FLASHLIGHT/LIGH T b8.52 -BULBS/PLUGS/PLIERS/WRENCH/SCREWDRIVER/ TOOL BOX-CITY HALL 45610 PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORE '`611 PSQ LEASING a MAINTENANCE -SEPTEMBER OCTOBER 5 NOVEMBER 88 MAINT 14 65.50 65.50 AGREEMENT-CI TY HALL 45612 R & R SPECIALTIES INC ICE BLADE-ICE ARENA-COMMUNITY CENTER 45613 REED'S SALES B SERVICE INC CORD-PARK MAINTENANCE I81.00 45614 SCOTT A REIN SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 240.00 45615 CITY OF RICHFIELD39821.8282 .82 45616 ROAD RESCUE INC FIR T AID QUARTER DISPATCH SERVICE FIRST AID EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT 217.67 45617 ST CROIX RECREATION CD INC 10 PICNIC TABLES-PARK MAINTENANCE 45618 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO -OFFICE SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STDRE/COMMUNITY 197 .0 0 CENTER 76.41 45619 SANCD INC -WASTEBASKETS/BUCKETS/WRINGERS/PLASTIC 2. 44 22 BAGS-POLICE DEPT 45620 SCHMIDT READY MIX INC CEMENT-STREET MAINTENANCE 45621 SEARS -2 DRYERS-1799.98-FIRE DEPT/COVER-POLICE B64.96 64,96 DEPT 45622 SETON NAME PLATE CORPORATION SIGNS-WATER DEPT 45623 SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM INC SERVICE-CDMMUNITY CENTER REPAIR 189.4111 6 45624 SHAKOPEE FORD INC .60 -BEARINGS 106 7,67 REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 45625 W GDRDDN SMITH CD GREASE-PARK MAINTENANCE 45626 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC -F ILM/FILM PROCESSING/SWIM CAP'STAPLER- 64.13 64.43 COMMUNITY CENTER 45627 ANGELA SOCHER EXPENSES-DAY CAMP/YOUTH TENNIS 22.27 45628 SODERQUIST SERVICES INC MOWING-PLEASANT HILL CEMENTERY 2 45629 SDUTHTOWN PLUMBING INC PLUMBING SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 79.40 45630 SOUTHWEST AUTO SUPPLY INC -BATTERIES/WAX/PAINT/SEAT CUSHIONS/BRAKE 4698.76 -SHOES/TESTER/ADHESIVE/BEARINGS/CARBURETOR -KITS/WHEEL CYLINDER/BRAKE PADS/SEALS/ 6075353 • A • -BRASS FITTINGS/TIRE VALVES/TEMPERATURE -CONTROL/GASKETS/STARTERS/FILTERS/TIRES -TUBES/POWER BOOSTER/ROTOR-EQUIPMENT MAINT/ 15631 SPORTS WORLD USA PARK MAINT/SEWER DEPT -TENNIS NETS/BALLS/SHORTS/SWIM SUITS/74 1699.90 -GIFT CERTIFICATES-8720.00/ICE PACKS/24 45632 STANDARD SPRING CO HELMETS-3270.00-COMMUNITY CENTER BOLTS/SPRINGS/BUSHINGS/U BOLTS/WHEEL 780.00 45633 STREICHEkS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ ALIGNMENT-FIRE DEPT UNIFORMS-$4556.10/FLASc HLIGHTS/BULLET 4971.24 PROOF VESTS-3391.14-POLICE DEPT 45634 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET -CONTROL ASSEMBLY/GREASE-FIRE OEPT/ 24.04 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 456.5 SUPPLEE ENTERPRISES INC BULBS-LIQUOR STORE 45636 SYBRON DEGREASER SEWER DEPT 62.70 45637 TARGET 220 -SUMMER PROGRAM SUPPLIES-PAR & RECREATION 164.34 DEPT 31.3E 456:8 TAYLOR SALES INC COVER GASKET/BEARINGS-COMMUNITY CENTER 45639 THOMPSON PLUMBING 49.36 45640 THOMPSON PLUMBING REFUND-PLUMBING PERMIT REFUND PLUMBING PERMIT 20.00 45641 TIGER STRIPING & SWEEPING STRIPING FIRE & POLICE DEPT PARKING LOT 10.00 2 45642 KEVIN TIMM SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 90.00 45643 TOWN & COUNTRY DODGE AIR CONDITIONING PARTS-EQUIPMENT MAINT 60.00 45644 TROPICAL SNO OF MN CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-ROUND LAKE PARK 162,72 45645 TURF SUPPLY CO GRASS SEED-PARK MAINTENANCE 127.50 45646 TWENTIETH CENTURY PLASTICS 10540.36 45647 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN-STREET INSPECTION OXYGEN STREET DEPT 540.36 45648 USA TODAY ADS LIQUOR STORE 37.20 45649 UNITED BUSINESS PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 34.00 45650 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 615,17 -551 US WEST CELLULAR INC MOBILE RADIO POLICE FORFEITURE DRUGS 159.97 652 ROD UTING SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT 799.00 45653 ALVIN VAN HORN SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 68.00 45654 VAN WATERS 5 ROGERS SODIUM SILICOFLUORIOE WATER DEPT 54.00 4565E VAUGHN DISPLAY FLAGS-WATER DEPT I862.50 45656 VESSCO INC -YOLK/0 RINGS/REPAIR CHLORINATOR/SCREWS/ 150.00 COUPLING/BELTS-WATER DEPT 1948.76 45657 VICTIM SERVICES AGENCY VHS TAPES-POLICE DEPT 45656 VIKING LABORATORIES INC 25.00 45659 CLAYTON G VNUK CHEMICALS COMMUNITY CENTER SMALL TOOLS WATER DEPT 813.35 45660 JIM WALTER PAPERS 159.25 45661 WATER PRODUCTS CO XEROX PAPER CITY HALL -TWO 1 1/4 METER-$296.16/SAW BLADES/PIPE2552.95152.95 45662 F -WRENCH/STAPLE GUN/LEAD SEALS-WATER DEPT 45662 SANDRANARIF WERTSWILLIAMS MILEAGE-SENIOR CENTER SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 119.83 45664 WILSON TANNER GRAPHICS PRINT BUSINESS CARDS ASSESSING DEPT/PARK 45.00 1214.00 4566E WINGFIELD PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING REPAIREAT AUTOMATICITR TRANSMISSION CENTER/POFIRED DEPT 45666 XEROX CORP SERVICE 705.20 45667 YOUNGSTEDTS INC WHEEL ALIGNMENT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50.10 45666 EARL ZENT EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT 34.9E 45669 ZEP MANUFACTURING CO CHEMICALS-STREET DEPT 14.59 45670 ZIEBART OF MINNESOTA INC 352.97 45671 KAY ZUCCARO RUSTPROOFING FIFE DEPT AQUA AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 80.00 ( 16763 I42.50 s SEPTEMBER 20,1988 45106 VOID OUT CHECK 15256 VOID OUT CHECK 896.25 5310 VOID OUT CHECK 24639.03 45404 VOID OUT CHECK 654 75-2640753 217.50 $920950.57 • • DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS 4 10 GENERAL 332780.14 1, 11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT 2498.33 15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M 76136.63 17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE 54503.44 20 CEMETARY OPERATIONS 250.00 21 POLICE FORFEITURE 1075.83 25 TRANSIT SYSTEM 9.29 31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP 8760.66 33 UTILITY BOND FUND 51591.02 43 77 FIRE DEBT FUND 65682.41 44 UTILITY DEBT FUND 89149.89 51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 114598.67 57 ROAD IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 6149.18 73 WATER FUND 17557.59 77 SEWER FUND 4889.86 81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 2655.63 82 FIRE RELIEF FUND 92662.00 $920950.57 1 3,1 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Carl Jullie FROM: Natalie Swaggert DATE: September 16, 1988 SUBJECT: Elim Homes Inc. Proposal On September 14 a sub-committee of the Human Rights and Services Commission met with a representative of Elim Homes Inc. to hear their proposal for a senior housing project in Eden Prairie. The sub-committee was impressed with the proposal and supports further consideration by the City Council. Desireable features are: I. Subsidized units for low income. Elim Homes has committed to provide low income rent subsidies through its foundation. 2. Mitchell Lake location. The selected site provides excellent access to existing services including its proximity to both the Community Center and the Senior Center. 3. Variety in Senior Housing options. The project reflects the economic demographics of the City of Eden Prairie and provides needed housing to maintain independent living for seniors at a variety of income levels. 4. Rental basis. The opportunity to rent senior housing is preferred over a buy in or life care fee approach. 5. Non-profit status of Elim Homes Inc. The sub-committee further recommends that Elim Homes be asked to do the following. * Future development of the site should include an Assisted Care facility. This would allow residents to remain on the site as their needs for care increase. * Transportation, dining, and activity programs shall be developed to maximize existing city services and ensure integration with the Senior Center, Family Center and Community Center. * A marketing and management approach should be developed to ensure that Eden Prairie residents wishing space in the project receive optimal consideration. NJS:bnm MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: City Manager Carl J. Jullie FROM: Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson SUBJECT: Proposals for Fall Yard Waste Collections DATE: September 14, 1988 Requests for proposals for fall yard waste collection services were mailed to all City-licensed refuse haulers in early August. The City requested proposals to collect yard wastes from single-family through four-plex buildings in which residents subscribe for refuse service for their individual units. Further, the collection period was to be for two weeks, October 24 through November 4, or for four weeks, October 10 through November 4. Four days of the week were specified to serve different areas of the City. The RFP anticipated that haulers would not be providing separate yard waste collection services on their own initiative. Response to Proposal: Two firms submitted proposals: Waste Management- Savage, and Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc./BFI. The proposals were quite similar with the exception of price. Of the 10,000 or so single- family through four-plex units in the City's housing stock, owners of about 8,700 are responsible for maintenance of their individual yards. Taking 8,700 as the number of units to be served, the following costs for service would be charged: Firm Cost Basis Cost,Oct.24-Nov.4 Cost, Oct.10-Nov.4 Waste Mgmt. $0.46/unit/wk. $8,280.00 $16,560.00 9,000-unit min. WSSI/BFI $60.89/hr. $4,870.80 $57.89/hr. $ 9,262.4D Waste Management-Savage noted that if de-bagging were not possible, another $0.35/unit/week, or $6,300 to $12,600, would be charged. In addition to the charges from private firms, the City would incur approximately $1,600 in printing and distribution expenses to insert two flyers in the City's official newspaper to publicize the service. Assuming WSSI/BFI's estimate is correct on the hours of service needed, total cost for the program would range between $6,500 and $9,900 for a two-week program, and $10,900 and $18,200 for a four-week program. Reimbursement rules that Hennepin County would apply to this program are unclear, but it would appear that 20 to 50 percent of the City's cost would be recoverable. Private Initiative: Immediately prior to issuance of the RFP, WSSI/BFI sent the City a letter indicating its plans to provide a separate yard waste collection program to its customers this fall. WSSI/BFI indicated it would be willing to provide service to its customers or under a City contract. If the City opted for a contract, WSSI/BFI would prefer not to provide the additional service free to its customers, although its fi representatives indicated some "compromise" arrangement could be made. Staff conducted further research into the services offered by residential waste collectors within the City. WSSI/BFI did not give a firm number of units served in Eden Prairie, but estimated that it handled 60 to 70 percent of the residential waste business in the CIty. Admiral Waste Management, which has 2,000 accounts in the City, has been providing separate yard waste collection year-round to its customers for the past two or three years. Waste Tech, the refuse collection subsidiary of Reuter, Inc., has between 600 and 700 Eden Prairie accounts whose yard waste is separated for compost at the Reuter Recycling, Inc. facility. If WSSI/BFI follows through on its plan to provide separate yard waste service (and it has not given any indication to the contrary), it appears that over 90 percent of those residences to be served by the City yard waste colleciton program would already have this service provided privately by SSSI/BFI, Admiral, and Waste Tech. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council not authorize a residential yard waste collection program for Fall 1968. Staff will work with refuse haulers to gather data on yard waste collected within Eden Prairie and report them to Hennepin County. CWD:jdp • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL YARD WASTE RECYCLING COLLECTION The City of Eden Prairie is considering offering its residents a yard waste collection program. These wastes would be recycled in conformance with the City's overall recycling plan. The City is seeking a firm or group of firms to collect yard wastes and deliver them to a site for composting. Service Area Approximately 10,000 single-family through four-plex units and Schedule: exist in Eden Prairie that would be served by the program. Collection from these homes would occur weekly under two possible time frames: 1) October 24 through November 4; or 2) October 10 through November 4, 1988. Days of collection are shown on the enclosed map. Waste Processing Proposers will need to identify the site or sites to which Site: the wastes will be delivered. If the proposer delivers waste to Hennepin County's Eden Prairie compost facility, the cost proposed should reflect the need to de-bag wastes prior to delivery. Wastes delivered to Hennepin County's Maple Grove compost facility may remain in bags. Other compost operations which may be utilized and the preparation required for the waste need to be identified. Preparation: Proposers must describe what preparation of materials is necessary for residents (e.g., what brush must be bundled separately, where wastes should be placed, etc.) Collection Cost: The contractor will need to identify the manner in which it will require compensation. For example, charges could be made based on a flat fee, an hourly cost, or a cost per ton or cubic yard of material collected. Costs proposed must estimate the total units of service (i.e., time provided or materials collected) for the two alternative service periods in order to estimate total program cost. Reporting: Because the City will be seeking funding assistance from Hennepin County, the amount of materials collected needs to be reported to the City and verifiable. This documentation will be submitted to the City. Other Conditions: Because the City will be grant recipient, regulations of Hennepin County and the State of Minnesota regarding such things as non-discrimination in employment may apply to the City and the contractor. Publicity: The proposer will need to identify the manner in which it will assist the City in publicizing the service. The City plans to work with local newspapers and to send mailers to remind residents of the service and program requirements. The contractor will be expected to receive phone calls from residents and handle their requests for service. Copies of logs relating to these customer calls will be provided to the City. .�i )J z Due Date: Proposals will be due August 29, 1988. They should be addressed to the attention of Craig Dawson, Assistant to the City Manager, City of Eden Prairie, 7600 Executive Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677. Questions may be directed to Mr. Dawson by calling 937-2262. Council Action: The Eden Prairie City Council must authorize implementation of the program. It is expected that the City Council will consider this matter at its September 6, 1988 or September 20, 1988 meeting. • ■.AYE ,j� . � f ? 4 • a ;�PE4 I ` ! ` ( ,• •, --,,--- ,i uu.,,J1_,:,$.7;----k.,A.- ..,m,,,,,,,,--civra,,4,,,,,,,$/t 1, i -,,---.1c i w ii7ili�• � ' s \ a1r IY D �.. cr s i i �; I : y~_� ,Vfkil Jl { uyw \ Z ( ' i y Mm, k41/ r 7L ki ! i 2� :t�44 \ :1 l /p l } �_r l { I I VZ- • f' ,`� �� u�/ s _14..-;1./1,-3,',A1.,-1 1I;11`1,qr-'''j:')'t')e,. ;: AlIlirlk =-ash_ ■.. 1 .-._ ���41[. s' C,atP ;7 1 ,.. 4 Ili dkI • wedAte ka t : ��,. IV Nil Illi 4 It "'40.1. --- ....,,i -4,- -,,,,-e..,:,1---Alli filgr v•-4 Nikim III _�� ,per t IIII ?h- ii lY ` ..\ . a t. .ti F, ^�` , :'1 WOODLAKE SANITARY SERVICE, INC. A Subsidiaryot Waste ©Systems,. August 10, 1988 Mr. Craig Dawson Assistant to the City Manager City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Craig: As per our conversation on Friday, August 5, 1988, Woodlake is planning on providing a fall yardwaste program to its custamrs in Eden Prairie. However, as you mentioned, the city is looking at providing a fall yardwaste program to all of the residents. Should the city decide to ask for bids I would be very interested in providing a proposal. Thank you. Sincerely, Kevin Tritz District Manager KT/kj • • • 9813 flying Cloud Drive I Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55347 I(612)941-5174 1 1 I W00DLAKE SANITARY SERVICE, INC. ASubstdlaryol BF Weste Systems- ■o•+..r..s.wno August 26, 1988 Mr. Craig Dawson Assistant to the City Manager CITY OF EDEti PRAIRIE 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344-3677 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL YARD WASTE RECYCLING COLLECTION Service Area Woodlake proposes to collect the yard waste and Schedule: four (4) days each week, Monday thru Thursday, as outlined by the city. Waste Processing All compost collected will be delivered to the Site: Hennepin County site in Maple Grove. Preparation: Yard waste (grass and leaves) must be kept separate from other refuse. Residents who participate in the Yard Waste Collection Program must place yard waste at the curb in plastic bags or biodegradable paper bags. Collection 1. ) The collection cost for October 24, Cost: through November 4, would be $ 60.89 per hour or an estimated total cost of $ 4,870.80. 2. ) The collection cost for October 10, through November 4, would be $ 57.89 per hour or an estimated total cost of $ 9,262.40. Reportingc The total number of tons collected will be documented at the compost facility and all documentation provided to the City on a weekly basis. 9813 Flying Cloud Drive I Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55347 I(612)941.5174 Iyl� City of Eden Prairie Request for Proposal Yard Waste Recycling Collection Page 2 Other Woodlake is in compliance with all County and Conditions: State labor requirements and is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Publicity: Woodlake would help publicize the Yard Waste Program by sending a special mailing to all Woodlake customers explaining the program. Respectfully submitted, • Kevin R. Tritz District Manager IQA Waste Management Company 11ZI SEPARATE YARD WASTE COLLECTION PROPOSAL CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE WASTE MANAGEMENT-SAVAGE 12448 Pennsylvania Ave. So. Savage, MN 55378 Michael Berkopec General Manager (612) 890-1100 ■ a! A Waste Management Company INTRODUCTION Waste Management of Savage is pleased to submit this proposal for a yard waste recycling program to the City of Eden Prairie. Solid waste disposal is a growing problem for many communities. As a result, recycling is becoming an important waste management tool. This proposed yard waste recycling program will place the City of Eden Prairie in the fore- front of those exploring alternatives to traditional waste hauling techniques. Waste Management's experience, talent, and dedication to service make the company ideally suited to implement this recycling program. We share your enthusiams for this new venture, and look forward to becoming your recycling partner. We also realize that the City of Eden Prairie is also considering other recycling options (newspaper, glass, aluminum) , and would like to discuss these opportunities with you. SERVICE AREA AND SCHEDULE Waste Management of Savage will use two rear-load packer trucks and four men to collect yard waste in the City of Eden Prairie on a weekly basis. Approximately 1,900 units would be served each day of a given weekday. The tentative boundaries are outlined in the attached city map. Waste Management is willing to assist the city in making residents aware of their yard waste collection day through flyers, etc.. WASTE PROCESSING SITE We expect to deliver the yard waste to the Maple Grove compost facility. If the Maple Grove site is closed or the de-bagging of waste becomes required, an additional charge of $.35 cents per unit will be necessary. PREPARATION All waste must be placed at the curbside of the nearest recognized public street. Grass, leaves, etc., must be bagged. COLLECTION COST The rate for weekly, curbside yard waste collection would be $.46 per unit/week. This rate is based on a minimum of 9,000 units served. The final count would be determined by the City before the project begins. Based upon 10,000 units served, the cost would be $4.600 per week. • aao° A Waste Management Company 1 Z1 Page 2 Proposal for City of Eden Prairie REPORTING Monthly volume reports would be submitted to the City. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION Affirmative Action policy is attached. PUBLICITY Waste Management will assist the City with door hangers, flyers, and local media interviews that promote and encourage the program. 2201 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 88-185 TH 5 LAYOUT APPROVAL (West Corporate Limits to 800 ft. West of CSAH 4) WHEREAS, the Commissioner of the Department of Transportation has prepared a preliminary layout for the improvement of a part of Trunk Highway #121, renumbered as Trunk Highway #5, within the corporate limits of the City of Eden Prairie, from the West Corporate limits to 800 feet west of CSAH 4, thereof; and WHEREAS, said preliminary layouts are on file in the office of the Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Minnesota, being marked, labeled, and identified as Layout No. 1B-S.P.2701-28 (5=121) from the West Hennepin County line to 800 feet west of CSAH 4. NOW, THEN, BE IT RESOLVED that said preliminary layouts for the improvements of said Trunk Highway within the corporate limits be and hereby are approved subject to the following: The City hereby approves the geometrics as shown on Layout Plan Number 1B-S.P.2701-28 (5=121) with the inclusion of traffic signal systems at Dell Road and Heritage Road as part of the initial construction. Also, the City requests MN/Dot to further evaluate noise abatement measures, tree planting and/or relocation and landscaping with approval of these items deferred subject to further review by the City. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 20, 1968. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk