HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 08/09/1988AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia
Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to
the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director
John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris
Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation &
Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director
of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and
Recording Secretary Deb Edlund
TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, 1988
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES OF REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY MAY 17 1988
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
Page 1645
Page 1673
B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 30-88, Amending City Code Chapter 2 Page 1559
by Repealing Section 2.88 Requiring the Filing of Financial
Statements Relating to Receipts and Disbursements by Candidates
and committees in Connection wittrtity Elections
C. Final Plat Approval for Wyndham Nob (located south of West 62nd Page 1674
StFie-t and east of Dell Road) Resolution No. 8E:155
D. Approve Bids for Phase II of the Community Center Repair Pa l e 1677
E. Final Plat Approval for Alpine Estates 2nd Addition ilocaed east
of County Rd. 4 south of the Chicago, MilweukEe, St. Pal and
Pacific Railway, in the south 1/2 of Section 6 -TResolution No.
88-rgY
Page 15)9
F. Approve Cooperative Agreement with Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed
District for Study of Surface Water Profiles of Purgatory Creek and
Other Public Waters within Eden Prairie
G. Receive Petition and Order Feasibility Study for Watermain
Extension on Pioneer Trail (CSAH No. 11 from Mitchell Road west to
Staring Lake 2nd Addition, I.C. 52-149 (Resolution No. 88-1 -657-
H. Change Order No. 4 for Wellhouse Construction, I.C. 52-072B
I. Release from Special Assessment Agreement for the Prairie Knoll
Subdivisii5F1-
Page 1682
Page 1686
Page 1688
Page 1693
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,August 9, 1988
J. Change Order No. 6 for Valley View Road I.C. No. 51-272
K. Approve Agreement with Chicago and Northwestern Railroad Company
for Storm Sewer Crossing in Legion Park I.C. 52-133 (Resolution
No. 88-1631 —
L. Order Feasibility Report for Watermain Extension on Eden Prairie
Road iCSAH No. 41 from Easy Street to proposed Fairfield
Addition, I.C. 52-147 (Resolution No. 88-164
M. APPROVING CDBG YEAR XIV EXPENDITURE--Authorizing Execution of
Agreement with South Hennepin Human Services Council and Authorizing
Assignment of Administrative Responsibilities to Hennepin County--
H.O.M.E. Program (Resolution #88-154)
N. PRAIRIE COURTS RETAIL CENTER--Request for Extension of Developer's
Agreement to August 5, 1989.
Page 1696
Page 1698
Page 1704
Page 1705
Page 1709
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. MINNESOTA MINI-STORAGE by Bruce Hubbard. Request for Comprehensive
Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Industrial on 7.7 acres, Zoning
District Change from Rural to 1-2 for 2.35 acres, and Preliminary
Plat of 7.7 acres into one lot for construction of 44,255 square
feet of storage buildings. Location: Northwest of Flying Cloud
Drive, southeast of U.S. Highway #169. (Resolution #88-149,
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; Ordinance #31-88, Rezoning;
Resolution #88-150, Preliminary Plat)
B. EDEN CREEK by JMS Equities, Inc. Request for Comprehensive Guide
Plan Change from Public Open Space to Low Density Residential on 1.9
acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 6.6 acres,
Preliminary Plat of 6.6 acres into 10 single family lots, one
outlot, and road right-of-way. Location: Southeast of County Road
#4, across from Mere Drive. (Resolution #88-151, Comprehensive
Guide Plan Amendment; Ordinance #32-88, Rezoning; Resolution #88-
152, Preliminary Plat)
C. PANNEKOEKEN HUIS OF EDEN PRAIRIE by Marco Construction. Request
for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Regional
Commercial on 1.24 acres, Zoning District Change from Office to C-
Reg-Service on 1.24 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board
of Appeals for construction of 79,020 square meet of office and
restaurant use. Location: Northwest of the intersection of Eden
Road and Glen Lane. (Resolution #88-153, Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment; Ordinance #33-88, Rezoning)
D. HAMILTON ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, I.C. 52-131 (Resolution No. 88-158)
E. VACATION 88-06 PART OF EDENVALE BOULEVARD IN LaVONNE INDUSTRIAL
PARK (Resolution No. 88-159)
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Resolution No. 88-161, Special Assessments
Page 1752
Page 1710
Page 1717
Page 1729
Page 1740
Page 1741
Page 1742
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,August 9, 1988
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
IX. APPOINTMENTS
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
B. Report of City Manager
1. 1987 Audit Report Page 1755
2. Receive and Approve 2nd Quarter General Fund Report Page 1756
3. Report of Formation of Waste Management Commission Page 1759
C. Report of City Attorney
D. Report of Director of Planning
E. Report of Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
1. Approve Playground Equipment Bids for Willow Park, Wyndham Knoll Page 1761
Park and Eden Lake School Park
2. Request from Eden Prairie Figure Skaters Club Page 1778
3. Flying Cloud Airport Recommendations Page 1782
4. Review of Scenic Easement Policy Page 1786
5. Recommendation of Use of Parks and Athletic Fields Page 1791
F. Report of Director of Public Works
G. Report of Finance Director
XI. NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
730FM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and
Patricia Pidcock.
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Asst. to
the City Manager Craig W. Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Paul, Director of
Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, Director
of Community Services Robert Lambert,
Director of Planning Chris Enger,
Recording Secretary Deb Edlund.
TUESDAY, MAY 17, 1988
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: All members were present.
PRESENTATION OF FIRST CHECK FOR THE STARING LAKE PARK AMPHITHEATER
FROM THE EDEN PRAIRIE LIONESS CLUB
Director of Community Services, Lambert made a brief presentation of
project and introduced Marilyn Lieb, President of the Eden Prairie
Lioness Club, and Lu McCoy. Mrs. Limb presented Mayor Peterson with
the first installment toward the $15,000 pledge for the Staring Lake
Park Amphitheater. Mayor Peterson thanked the Lioness Club for the
contribution and to its on-going commitment to the betterment of Eden
Prairie.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve the
agenda as published and amended.
Items added to the agenda: Resolution 88-88 under ITEM VI.B.
Under ITEM X.A1 Peterson requested discussion on Garbage.
Under ITEM X.A2 Pidcock requested to discuss a Resolution for
an Ordinance to bury future utility lines. Under ITEM X.A3
Harris requested to make an announcement.
Motion carried unanimously.
/PC
City Council Minutes 2 May 17, 1988
II, MINUTES
A. Special City . Council Meeting held ThursdayApril_28, 1988
MOTION.: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve
minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held Thursday,
April 28, 1988 as submitted.
Pidcock questioned the status of the minutes. City
Manager Jullie answered that due to staff changes, the
minutes are behind a couple of meetings, but will be
available soon.
Motion carried unanimously.
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Use of Forfeiture Funds
C. Youth Scholarship Program
D. Approval of 1-494 Joint Powers Organization Agreement and
authorization for Mayor and City Manager to execute on
behalf of the City
E. Recolve.2etition for Street and Improvements for
WJL Road and Authorize Preparation of a Feasibility.
Study, I.C. 52-144 (Resolution No. 88-82)
F. Approval of Agreement with NSP for Easement Encroachment
at Fire Station No. 4
G. Authorize Permjt Application for connection to mycc
Sanitary Sewer Interceptor for Starwood Addition
(Resolution No. 88-84)
H. FAITH cHURCH OF THE NAZARENE. Adoption of Resolution #88-
78, Denying 2nd Reading of Ordinance #23-87, Rezoning from
Rural to Public of 5.87 acres and Denial of Platting of
5.87 acres into one lot for construction of a church.
Location: South of County Road #1, east of Blossom Road.
(Resolution 088-78, Denial of Project)
I. ALB.INE_ESTATES 2ND ADPITTON by Red Rock Heights
Partnership. 2nd Reading of Ordinance #6-88, Zoning
District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 8.4 acres;
Approval of Developer's Agreement for Alpine Estates 2nd
Addition; and ADoption of Resolution #88-79, Authorizing
Summary of Ordinance #6-88 and Ordering Publication of
Said Summary. 8.4 acres into 14 single family lots and
road right-of-way. Location: East of Alpine Trail, South
of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad.
iGq(p
City Council Minutes 3 May 17, 1988
(Ordinance 46-88, Rezoning; Resolution 488-79, Authorizing
Summary and Publication)
SEARS GARDEN STORE by Sears, Roebuck and Company. 2nd
Reading of Ordinance 418-88-PUD-4-88, Rezoning within the
C-Regional District and within the Eden Prairie Center
Planned Unit Development District on 87.75 acres; Approval
of Developer's Agreement for Sears Garden Store; and
Adoption of Resolution 488-80, Authorizing Summary of
Ordinance 418-88-PUD-4-88, and Ordering Publication of
Said Summary. 87.75 acres with variances for exterior
building material, for the construction of a 1,000 square
foot seasonal temporary structure for an outside storage
garden center. Location: Eden Prairie Center/Sears.
(Ordinance 418-88-PUD-4-88, Rezoning and PUD Amendment;
Resolution 488-80, Authorizing Summary and Publication)
K. Request for Grading Permit for Charles Webber 17249
Valley_Road
L. Construction Change Authorization for Community Center
M. Request from Lions Club for Temporary Liquor License for
Schooner Days_
N. Request for Grading permit by MnDOT to construct an MTC
Park & Ride at the Southwest Corner of Flying Cloud Drive
and Shady_Qak Road
0. Request for Grading Permit by Eden Prairie School District
to expand the parking lot at the bus garage located at
Scenic Heights Road east of Eden Prairie Road
R. Rental Fees for Outdoor Center
MOTION .: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson to approve
Items A-R on the Consent Calendar.
Harris requested clarification on Item_O; how was the
derivation of the percentages of participation for
inlivideal cities under the Joint Powers Organization
determined? Peterson replied that the basis was
anticipated traffic volumes produced by each of the cities
by the year 2010. Bentley stated that he would vote NO to
Item D relative to the fact that it includes expenditure
of funds.
Pidcock asked if City Attorney Pauly had reviewed the NSP
materials for Tte.m_p and if Pauly was in agreement, as it
was drawn up by NSP's attorneys. Pauly stated that he
reviewed a document last winter and assumed this was the
same one. City Manager Jullie commented that Assistant
City Attorney, Ric Rosow had reviewed the agreement.
/6Ln
City Council Minutes 4 May 17, 1988
Peterson questioned Item I in regard to the times for
truck hauling. Dietz replied that the project would not
be completed while children are in school. The project
would take place during the summer months.
Bentley asked Enger about memo stating that the Developer
was not in favor of this proposed restriction. Enger
replied that the form in the information packet still
contains the restrictions for not hauling while children
are in school. The Developer believed the hours to be
more restrictive than originally anticipated. The
Developer had requested the restrictions be removed. If
the Council would like hourly restrictions in the
development agreement, restrictions could be added. As
the agreement was signed now, it did not contain
restrictions.
Bentley requested to hear from the Developer. The
Developer stated that the project was weeks away from
starting and school would be out. Developer's main
concern was the speed of trucks.
Peterson questioned how long the project would take.
Developer replied approximately two months. Peterson
commented that the speed limit was at 20 MPH. Developer
stated favoring the speed limit.
Enger stated the 20 MPH speed limit was currently part of
the agreement; however the time limit was not part of the
agreement at this time.
Peterson questioned if Council should consider what hourly
restrictions would pertain if the project continues until
the fall. Dietz replied that the hourly restrictions
could be a condition of the grading permit.
Anderson questioned if the speed limit could be lower than
20 MPH. Anderson suggested 15 MPH, but questioned if it
could be enforced. Dietz replied that the speed limit
could be part of the grading permit; however the road
could not be posted and enforced with a 15 MPH speed
limit. If the speed limit were part of the grading
permit, the permit could he revoked if compliance was not
met.
Bentley believed the speed limit could best be enforced
through the grading permit.
Bentley stated that .nLJN had not yet been considered by
the 7outhwest Metro Transit Commission in terms of
compatibility with the total system and possible federal
funding conditions. Bentley asked Jullie why this had
come up again. Jullie replied that per his conversation
with Ms. Miller, the Commission's plan had not
/AY
City Council Minutes 5 May 17, 1988
Incorporated this Park & Ride site. The fOCUS Was being
placed more on the Wallace Road and Highway 5 area.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to continue
Item N to the next Council meeting. Motion carried
unanimously.
Regarding Item 0, Pidcock stated concern about grading
that had already taken place at the School Bus Garage,
about flattening the area and tree loss. Dietz commented
that the spruce trees could be transplanted. Pidcock
stated that there will be tree loss and questioned if
another alternative was possible. Dietz answered that the
School District could put in an extensive retaining wall
system. The District was reluctant to spend a lot of
money on something that may not be permanent, because of
the Highway 212 alignment.
Jeff Schoenbauer of Brauer & Associates stated that the
oaks would not be removed; only the spruce would be and
they would be transplanted.
Pidcock stated that the City would not allow a private
developer to do this, and questioned why the Council would
allow a public body to do this.
Bentley commented that a tree replacement formula had not
been submitted that would be consistent with City
guidelines.
Schoenbauer stated willingness to work with Staff if
additional screening is requested. A fiber blanket would
be utilized to stabilize the slopes to prevent erosion.
Anderson questioned if a tree inventory had been done.
Lambert confirmed that a tree inventory had not been done.
Anderson stated that the City requires a tree inventory
of any development, along with a tree replacement plan
based on City policy. Jullie reported that he had talked
with Dr. McCoy and that he had agreed that the District
would adhere to City requirements for tree replacement.
Pldcock questioned the reasoning behind the severe
alteration of the hill. Jullie replied that the District
needed a large amount of soil for soil correction work at
the new middle school. Pidcock stated that the City had a
record for not allowing hills to be altered or removed
without City approval and requested more information
regarding the District's plans before going ahead with
this project. Pidcock was also concerned about drainage
problems.
Bentley suggested a continuance until the next meetlnj to
allow the District to provide a tree Inventory, submit
/6(19
City Council Minutes 6 May 17, 1988
plan for the tree replacement, along with a review of the
drainage situation.
Schoenbauer commented that he had met with the Watershed
District and it did not have concerns relative to
drainage. Schoenbauer was concerned about continuing this
item because with the high banks, there was a potential
hazard if a significant rainfall occurred..
Bentley was concerned that existing grading had been done
without adequate permits. Dietz replied that the issue
tonight was for the issuance of a grading permit. Bentley
stated that extensive horrow had taken place and the
permit was being applied for after-the-fact.
Peterson asked if the Council would approve this item
subject to Staff review and approval. Pidcock and Bentley
were not in favor of this. Harris said she was
struggling with the fact that the same rules should apply
to public bodies as private ones; however,given the
current status of the site she would support allowing the
Staff to review and approve the permit.
Schoenbauer said that he was willing to work with staff,
would do a tree inventory, hut would like to move forward
tonight to eliminate the problem.
Anderson questioned what stance the City would take if
this were not the School District. Jullie replied that
because of the potential hazard the City needed to move
quickly. The school administration had apologized. The
District was now aware of the City requirements and this
would not happen again.
Pidcock questioned how the District did not know the
requirements and where were the City inspectors. Jullie
replied that the inspectors had noticed the grading and
asked the District to get a permit and plan put together.
It took longer than it should have.
Bentley stated that there never should have been allowed
such a dangerous situation to occur. The Council could
continue this matter and at the same time request to see
immediate correction of the area and erosion control
taking place. Public bodies are under the same
requirements as private bodies relative to grading and
tree replacement. The proper documents had not been
properly submitted to the City. Bentley stated that he
would agree to continue, but not to approve the plan
tonight.
Peterson asked Pauly if the City had authority over the
School District on this matter. Pauly replied that
City Council Minutes 7 May 17, 1988
Bentley was correct. The School District was required to
follow the same rules.
Harris questioned the benefit to delay item beyond the
tree replacement.
Anderson asked where the Council drew the line. Harris
commented that the City should have one standard for both
public and private bodies, but what the Council had to
deal with now was issuing a grading permit in the midst of
an almost-completed project.
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to amend the previous
motion and Continue Item 0 to the next regular Council
Meeting.
Peterson stated that he would vote against the motion.
Peterson believed that the School District representatives
had demonstrated good faith at this point and believed
that the Staff was competent to make sure that the
District conformed with the City policies.
Anderson asked if the Council would like to decide if the
project should have a graded bank or retaining walls.
Anderson believed that if this item were to be passed the
Council would be saying go ahead do what the District
wished. Peterson replied that he had stated upon Staff
review and approval. Anderson stated that at this point
the Council had not given Staff any direction. Peterson
stated that he did not wish to see the School District to
spend money on something that may not be permanent because
of the highway.
Anderson stated that he could vote against the motion to
continue if the Council could be guaranteed that no oak
trees would be lost. Schoenbauer replied that no oaks
would be taken out and the spruce will be transplanted.
Snow fence could be placed around the oaks to further
protect them. Diets believed that the plan could proceed
as proposed with the guarantee of the oaks being preserved
and also proposed a 2-1 slope and use a grass cover.
Bentley stated that the point was if this were a private
developer it would he treated differently and a degree of
consistency needs to be established.
Harris believed that there was sufficient cause to issue
the permit given certain guarantees.
Motion failed with a 2-3 vote, with Bentley and Pidcock
voting in favor.
City Council Minutes 8 May 17, 1988
MOTION:
Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve Item 0 with
the following conditions: 1) Consider reducing the slope
to a 2-1. 2) All trees removed from the site be relocated
within the site. 3) No impact on oaks. Motion carried 4-
1 with Bentley voting "No".
Anderson stated that he had to make a decision tonight
that he did not like, believed that the School District
put the Council on the spot, and hoped it would not happen
again.
Motion carried to approve the Consent Calendar with
Bentley voting "No" to Items 0 and D.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PETITION FOR SIDEWALK ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF BOYD AVENUE
(Resolution No. 83-75) Continued from May 3, 1988
Jullie stated that this is not an official Public Hearing.
The property owners were notified that the Council would
be discussing the request for a feasibility study.
Steve Schatz, 7001 Boyd Avenue, stated opposition. Two
gentlemen petitioned for the sidewalk originally, a
majority of the residents on Boyd Avenue did not want the
sidewalk and believed the issue would be dropped. Schatz
stated concern about traffic speed and children playing in
the streets, but was not sure a sidewalk was the answer.
Schatz commented that Mr. Dietz had come to a neighborhood
meeting and suggested alternatives. A curve sign was put
up and the speed limit reduced to 20 MPH. Schatz felt
there would be more of a hazard going from level sidewalk
to sloped driveways. Schatz stated that some properties
would need retaining walls because of sloping. Schatz
concerned about assessment being split evenly.
Judy Kvilhaug, 7109 Boyd Avenue, stated opposition.
Safety was an issue, but she did not feel the neighborhood
had done its homework to find other remedies other than a
sidewalk. She felt there was not a legitimate concern at
this time. The speed on the street is not in excess of 30
MPH. She felt the neighborhood was wasting the Council's
time.
Bob Woxland, 7081 Boyd Avenue, favored the sidewalk. He
stated that the street has 39 children presently, 24 of
which were on the south side of the street. There is a
hus stop, hut no way to get to it except by the street.
The children were riding their bikes in the middle of the
street. The safety of the children was his main concern.
/60
City Council Minutes ¶1 May 17, 1088
Mate Cabot, 7033 Boyd Avenue, ;.,tated oppot.ition. Pa bet
felt that the hack yards were wide open and were a safe
place for children to play.
Pat Schatz, 7001 Boyd Avenue, stated that the bike path
did not go to the school, and the foot path in the park
was not shoveled in the winter. This was why the children
took the bus to school.
Janice Cox, 7065 Boyd Avenue, favored the sidewalk. She
felt that a sidewalk would be a better alternative for
biking, walking and skateboarding than the street. She
said that never will the neighborhood be in 100%
agreement. Cox believed that if only one child was
protected the sidewalk would have paid for itself.
Dan Donovan, 7093 Boyd Avenue, favors the sidewalk. He
stated that a sidewalk would provide an alternative to the
children playing in the street. He felt the sidewalk
would not totally solve the problem, but the children
would be safer.
Pat Frandle, 7057 Boyd Avenue, stated opposition. She
felt that the slanting driveways and flat sidewalk were
more of a hazard than the street. She stated that the
children can be seen for quite a distance, but felt that
the speed of the traffic should be addressed. Frandle
commented that there are very few sidewalks throughout
Eden Prairie.
Norm Cox, 7065 Boyd Avenue, favored the sidewalk. Cox
stated that he was the one who initiated the proposal for
a sidewalk. He said that at first they did not realize
the cost.:; involved. Cex recommended a feasibility and
cost study.
Joy Case, 7025 Boyd Avenue, stated opposition. She
questioned who was liable if someone fell on the sidewalk
because it was not shoveled. City Attorney Pauly replied
that the sidewalk would he in the boulevard and ultimately
the responsibility would be the City's, but if someone
left, for example a skateboard, on the sidewalk and
someone was injured the person who left the skateboard
would be liable. Pauly further commented that unless an
ordinance was passed requiring residents to shovel the
sidewalk the City would be liable.
Harris believed that a need for more neighborhood support
would have to he present before moving toward a
feasibility study.
Anderson stated disappointed in the development of trails
In this area. Anderson estimated a savings of
approximately :770,000 if the children could walk to
City Council Minutes 10 May 17, 1188
cobol PeterSon asked how the trail related to this
sidewalk. Anderson replied that the trails have never
been extended. Boyd Avenue is a main transportation route
to the park and the school.
Harris understood that trails were not being proposed to
connect even if the sidewalk were constructed. Dietz
replied that trails were not being proposed now.
MOTION:
Harris moved, seconded by Bentley that the City not
undertake a feasibility study at this time.
Bentley commented that the City and the Council did care
about children and about safety. Bentley believed that
the City and the maJority of the residents were not ready
for the costs necessary to put sidewalks throughout the
City.
Motion carried with a 4-1 vote with Anderson voting "No".
B. „57.144u,mq L4k5_2up_Ap1ITIgN by Red Rock Heights
Partnership. Request for Preliminary Platting of 8.3
acres into 13 single family lots within the R1-22
District. Location: North of County Road 111 between
Eicholts Addition and Starring Lake 1st Addition.
(Resolution #38-67, Preliminary Plat) Continued from
May3, 1988
Jullie stated that this item was continued from the May 3,
1388 meeting.
Mr. Oilk made a presentation of project, stating the main
concerns of the Planning Commission to be the storm
drainage, if lot 0 5 was on the cul-de-sac, and the
frontage on lot 8 13 along County Road 0 1. Gilk said
that the cul-de-sac could be modified if necessary for lot
4 5 and was proposing a 20 easement for a driveway for
lot 0 13. Oilk stated that after looking at several
options to -orrect the storm drainage problems, he was now
proposing to pay for a storm sewer pipe system to be
installed.
Dietz stated that the primary issue that was out of the
developer's control was the storm sewer situation.
Dietz said that what was being proposed was a drain field
system similar to what was in a farm field. The pipe
would be a straight pipe going through the backyards and
could be permanent. The solution as proposed by the
developer would work and the developer would bear the
cot. The alternative would be an expensive assessment
process with coats in excess of 7150,000.
1664
City C uncil Minutes 11 May 17, 1938
Peterson questioned if the proponent had perMission from
the affected property owners. Gilk replied no.
Pat Hartc11, 9140 Staring Lane West, questioned where
drainage would be outletted to, how much land would be
disrupted, and if the pipe was necessary with Mason Homes
coming into the area soon providing sewer and watermains.
Hartell stated major concerns to be increased erosion
problems and the disruption to the current neighborhood.
Kathy Schwank, 9090 Staring Lane West, stated that the
proposed pipe would go right through her property. The
property already had drainage from the roadway. She was
concerned that now the water from the development would
drain into her land and overburden the property. She
hoped the Council would deny this project until sewer and
water can be provided.
Peterson asked Gllk to address the questions presented by
the affected property owners. Cilk replied that the
proposed pipe would go into the Mason property. The pipe
would only be for emergency situations, not every time it
rained.
Peterson stated concern about the effect on Mason
property. Cilk answered that the piping was designed to
connect to the sewer when the Mason property was developed
Peterson questioned the timing on water and sewer from the
northwest. Dietz replied the sewer and water would
probably come from the north and be served by Mitchell
Road sewer, hut it would be difficult to determine the
exact location because future lot lines are not known.
Bentley asked Gilk where the pending would take place when
the tile system was utilized. Gilk replied the water
would flow north. The intent was not to dump the problem
onto another property.
Cilk stated that there would be a month of inconvenience,
at the most, to current property owners.
Pidcock commented that unless the proponent could get an
agreement from the property owners involved, it was
premature to be dealing with the proposal. The Council
could not give the developer permission to cross private
property. cilk replied that the piping solution was being
proposed an a condition of approv.11. CM< commented that
if this solution could not gain approval then he would
have to corn o h.-Ink to the Council 9nd ask for a public
improvement project and have the city put the storm sewer
in.
City Council Minutes 12 May 17, 1988
Bentley eked Panly where the City stood regarding
potential approval on a preliminary plat with conditions
that would be subject to the final plat. Pauly replied
that the State statue permits imposition of conditions on
a preliminary plat. Frequently rezoning proposals are
heard in tandem with preliminary platting. The
Developer's Agreements reflect platting as well as
rezoning. Conditions need to be ones that the City has
the authority to impose. Pauly believed that arranging
for storm sewer drainage would fall in the City's range of
authority. Bentley asked if this meant subject to the
proponent reaching acceptable arrangement for the
construction of the storm water run off to the north.
Pauly replied that the conditions need to be spelled out
in the record and the Developer's Agreement.
Dietz commented that the Council needed to consider the
two alternatives: 1) Proponent pays for entire system; or
2) Special assessment for the project.
Anderson believed that the project was premature. There
were too many problems: water and sewer not in, storm
water drainage, une lot not approved. Anderson commented
that two to three years down the line changes were going
to occur in this area. The water and sewer would be in,
the Mason project would be on line, and many of the
problems would be solved.
Peterson asked Dietz when a projection for the water and
sewer would be available. Dietz replied that what was
currently proposed was that the water would come in with
the Mitchell Road project. The sanitary sewer would not
be proposed until possibly West Staring Lane had
petitioned for sewer. Dietz said that sewer would be
available throuyh the Mason Property, but the problem
would be how to get it through the developed and
undeveloped property to the north. Anderson questioned
how far the Mason trunk line would be from this project.
Dietz replied that the connection would have to come from
the north, hut did not know the distance.
Gilk stated that originally an enlargement of the pond was
proposed to handle additional run off. Gilk also
commented that the project would need City water.
Peterson questioned if Staff wore in favor of pending.
Dietz replied that the City policy had always been to make
certain an outlet was provided for all pending basins.
The pipe would probably not be used often. Dietz
recommended against a landlocked pond.
No further comments from the audience.
City Council Minutes 13 May 17, 1938
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to adopt Resolution 88-
67, Preliminary Plat, contingent on satisfactory
resolution by the proponent of storm water system access
across properties to the north. Motion carried
unanimously.
C. TECENOLOCY PARK PHASE IV by Technology Park Associates.
Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on
approximately 41 acres, Planned Unit Development District
Review with variances and Zoning District Change from
Rural to 1-2 on 13 acres with shoreland variances to be
reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Preliminary Plat of
approximately 11 acres into 1 lot and 2 outlots for
construction of 162,860 square feet of industrial use in
two buildings. Location: West of Golden Triangle Drive,
north of Nine Mile Creek, east of Smetana Lane.
(Resolution 888-73, DUD Concept; Ordinance #19-88-PUD-3-
88, Zoning District Change to I-2-PUD-3-88; Resolution
#88-74, Preliminary Plat) Continued from May 3, 1988
meeting.
Jullie stated that this item was continued from the May 3,
1988 meeting and that Staff has had several meeting with
the proponents. A revised site plan was received late
this afternoon.
Mike Gair, representing Hoyt Development, presented what
had transpired in the last two weeks. Hoyt has a signed
agreement with Mr. & Mrs. Ed Smetana with regard to access
to their property and the permanent paving of the driveway
to their property with snow removal and maintenance. Brad
Hoyt and Gary Lally had met with Staff to discuss access
from Golden Triangle Drive.
Gair addressed concern of access to the Cherne property.
An access easement was being proposed to the Cherne
property and the construction of a 32-foot-wide roadway
allowing access over a forty-foot-wide easement over the
Hoyt property to the western portion of the Cherne
property. At this time an agreement between Hoyt and
Cherne had failed to move forward.
Brad Hoyt commented that now the project is much closer to
existing grade. Hoyt had condensed the project, while at
the same time maintaining the driveway spaces to code and
have not foreclosed the future extension of 76th Street.
Hoyt would dedicate a 40' easement to the City.
Bill Cherne believed that the proposed road alignment
would bisect the Cherne property and preclude development
of a corporate headquarters project. Cherne favored the
West 76th Street option. Gherne stated that he had tried
City Council Minutes
14 May 17, 1938
without success to obtain on easement from Hoyt 's to the
northoast section of his property. Cherne believed the
access being proposed was a 32-foot truck alley and was
concerned about the traffic if a corporate headquarters
would be developed. Cherne was concerned about the 860'
elevation being proposed. Cherne also commented that if
the proposal goes through as is, he will not have the
desire to work with Frank Smetana.
Bentley stated that it would not be determined by Hoyt if
76th Street gees through or not, that it would be a City
decision.
Frank Smetana, 7722 Smetana Lane, stated objection to the
proposal based on the same reasons stated at the last
Council Meeting. Frank Smetana believed the value of his
property would go down when the Hoyt development was
constructed. Frank Smetana stated favoring the connection
of Smetana Lane with Golden Triangle Boulevard. Frank
Smetana dil not believe that the issue of transition had
been addressed. Frank Smetana believed that the grade
issue which was part of the 1985 Pup was final.
Jollio questioned if the best solution would be to refer
the matter back to Staff and the proponents to make
another effort to work this out. Jullie believed that the
76th Street access needed more attention am to how it
could go through and how it would be paid for.
Peterson stated that the resolutions have not COMP forward
and that It was hard to helive that the three parties
could Not COMC to an agreement .althont getting the Council
involved.
Harris stated agreement with Peterson and suggested
referring this proposal back to Staff.
Bentley stated that this item should he dealt with now,
not referred hack to Staff. The screening issue had been
dealt with. The issue at the Planning Commission was that
a road access was not being made available. The access
was being proposed through the middle of the property. A
restructured plan had been submitted allowing for the
potential development of West 76th Street to be
constructed.
P1(1 ,2u(:k asked Eager for his comments. Have the concerns
of Staff been addressed adequately? Enger outlined two
situations: City Staff recommended that there be some
form of puhlic circulation by having an additional nutlet
from Hoyt development to Valley View Road to provide for
flexibility in the distribution of traffic to
intersections. A public outlet would not be needed to two
adjoining properties and a private drive would he
City Council Minutes 15 May 17, 1988
acceptable. At this tlme an aere-ment on the private
eolutien had not come about. Enger etated that the City
could impose site planning considerations on the Cherne
property when it was developed. Hoyt would provide its
hal f now and when the Cher ne property was developed the
City would have to resolve this with Cherne at that time.
This solution being to defer a decision.
Enger stated that the other scenario was that the Hoyt-
propoeed solution did not accomplish what the Council
wonted and did not substitute for a public road
circulation. Enger stated that none of the alternatives
presented thus far have made all parties happy. Enger
believed that if every party would give a little, the
problem could be resolved.
Pidcock questioned if access for emergency vehicles was
being provided as requested. Eager replied yes; however,
this was not the only consideration. Enger believed that
Cherne had now seen a benefit to his property with the
secondary access not just for emergency vehicles. The
Staff had recommended the access originally for the Hoyt
development to have another way out, but if Cherne did not
continue the private road on through then the cross-
circulation issue would not he resolved.
Enger stated that the two proposals that have the most
validity are the proposal that Hoyt had made tonight, with
the advantages being that it complements the Hoyt
development, it provides Ed and Marcella Smetana with
accoee to the east, which in what they desire, allows for
Cherne and Frank Smetana to try and work something out
with Frank Smetana 's property, allows for Cherne and Hoyt
to work together for development of the northern portion
of their properties. The disadvantages to this proposal
made Chorne decide now if the central access point would
work for him and at this time he had stated that he was
not comfortable with this proposal.
Bentley commented that Enger had presented a lose-lose
scenerlo for the Hoyt property. Bentley believed that
what was being said was that Hoyt can not develop until
Cherne decides what he wants to do with his property.
Enger etated that the Council had alternatives. This was
a difficult problem and it has not been resolved.
Anderson steted that Cherne was correct that if the hill
went down, the City would be looking at an industrial
area. Andereon's main concern was to maintain some of the
natural characteristics of the lend, which Cherne believed
he could lo with a corporate headquarters site. Anderson
would like to see more work on this proposal.
16S9
City Council Minutes 16 May 17, 1988
Peteon 1-.,liewed that defetriffj thIs ioatter would leave
Frank Smetana uncertain of his outcome.
Bentley stated that the proposal conformed with the
original PUP and allowed for an access to the middle or to
the north of the property, and screening had been
provided. The construction of these buildings was granted
in the original PUD.
Harris was concerned with public access issue and traffic
flow. Brad Hoyt replied that a 32-foot access was the
(Illivalent of a full-width City street. Hoyt believed that any alignment would level the hill.
Peterson asked Hoyt if 76th Street was going to be the
through street, would the development of the northern
property be as shown on the current plan. Hoyt replied
yes. Hoyt stated that he could not solve all the
problems. Hoyt had a timing problem, as leases had been
Signed and he had contract payments to make. Hoyt had
gone to significant expense and effort to solve the
problems.
Peterson requested Enger to confirm that an approval of
this proposal would not preclude either 76th or 74th
Street. Enger replied an approval would not preclude 76th
Street. 74th Street would not be involved.
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to close the Public
Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 88-73 for PUP Concept
Review. Motion carried 4-1 with Anderson voting "No".
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to approve lot Reading
of Ordinance No. 19-88-PUD-3-83 for Zoning District change
to I-2-PUD-3-88. Motion curried 4-1 with Anderson voting
"No".
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded hy Harris to adopt Resolution
No. 83-74 for Preliminary Plat which would include an easement
City Council Minutes 17 May 17, 1988
over the area agreed to per plan dated May 17, 1988.
Pauly asked for clarification if this was to be a private
of public easement. Jullie replied that it was intended
to be a private easement to be vacated only with City
permission and would be maintained privately. The right-
of-way did not meet City standards, but would provide the
access the City was looking for. The road would not be a
publicly maintained.
Motion carried 4-1 with Anderson voting "No".
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to direct Staff to
prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission
and Staff recommendations that also would indicate an
agreement to build a private road easement as previously
indicated in the Preliminary Plat motion and the proponent
sign a statement that they would not oppose the
construction of West 76th Street at some time in the
future as part of the Developer's Agreement. Motion
carried 4-1 with Anderson voting "No".
D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS TO FRANLO ROAD IN THE
SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 22, I.C. 52-
122 (Resolution No. 18-33)
Jullie stated that official notice of this Public Hearing
was published on May 4 and May 11, 1988 in the Eden
Prairie News. Copies of the notice together with the
Feasibility Report were mailed to all property owners
listed on the preliminary assessment roll.
Dietz presented the project, stating the purpose tonight
being to discuss the feasibility to construct Frani° Road
as it exists today and extending it from Grier Lane to
Prairie Center Drive. The catalyst for this project was
the development of the Lund Center.
Dietz also presented tho possibility of extending Medcom
Boulevard as part of this project. Dietz explained that
to accomplish this 400 feet of the road would have to be
removed due to the grade and two homes would have to be
removed or relocated to accommodate this alignment. Dietz
stated that as per the Staff Report, this was not the
proper time to extend Medcom Boulevard.
Dietz reported that there were no utilities on Frani° Road
and sanitary sewer and water are being proposed.
Diets stated that the estimated costs to he 8350,000 with
approximately 318,000 being the City cost to install the
median at the intersection of Prairie Center Drive. The
1661
City Council Minutes 18 May 17, 1988
City code requites a four-lane realway for commercial
standards, while the residential L -.tandard reguires a 32-
foot-wide street. A dual assessment rate had been
identified: $78.33 per front foot for residential and
1101.23 per front foot for commercial.
Diets reported that if the project would be approved
tonight it would he possible to achieve substantial
completion before winter.
Diet: vesented a letter from Lee Johnson In which ho
expressed five points of concern, primarily having to do
with allocation of costs for the improvements..
Bentley asked Dietz what the width of the road would be.
Dietz replied two-lanes 32-feet wide, widening to four
lanes at the approach to Prairie Center Drive.
Pon Rishavy, 6705 Cornelia Drive, Edina, who owned the
corner lot on Frani° Road. Rishavy believed that the
timing did not accommodate the residents, but did
accommodate Lund:. Rishavy believed that the project
should wait until the larger areas were developed rather
than burden the seven or eight land owners currently
owning property. Rishavy bclloved that few people would
henefiL from the sidewalh. Rishavy questioned what data
would substantiate the necessity to straighten the road at
the corner being proposed, and believed that this would
only Increase the speed of traffic on the road. Rishavy
contends that this is a corner, not a curve in the road as
stated in the study.
Charles Blo.sener, 9561 Frani° Road, stated that agreement
with Mr. Rishavy in that this would be a burden to
landowners and that the project was premature. Blesener
ballevcd that if Lund s had not been developed at this
location this would not be proposed and that the residents
should not be burden with the expense for the commercial
landowners benefit.
Ken Nygaard, 1575 Franlo Road, stated that the property
owners have already had three assessments; for storm sewer
and holding pond, for Prairie Center Drive and then for
the extezi on of Prairie Center Drive. Now the City was proposing another assessment and believed this unfair.
Nygaard believed that accidents will increase with this
alignment of the road.
Anten Westerhaus, 8470 Franlo Road, asked Dietz is the
City was building the seer I. the grade for Medcom
Boulevard in the future. Diet: replied that this would
allow for a connection at sometime in the future.
Westerhaus concerned because his house was one that would
have to he removed and doesn't want to wait several years
i6A
City Council Minutes 19 May 17, 1998
in flud out If Ills house would be removed. HQ believed
that some type of c.ompensation to the homeowner should he
made.
Bentley stated that this was not an assessment hearing and
that !f this project were ordered, the Council could
direct Staff t the assessment hearing that the deferment
opportunity be made available for homestead properties.
In no doing the financial impact would not occur until the
pruperty owner connected fur the utilities.
Luc Johnson, stated having mixed feeling about the road.
Johnson agreed that Frani° Road dil need improvement, but
did not believe the assessment as proposed was equitable.
Charles Pufahl, 8550 Frani° Road, stated that when the
storm drainage was put in for the shopping center the
Council at that time had promised that when the sewer and
w,Iter would be put In the the City would absorb the brunt
of the costs. Pufahl did not believe that the other
property owners had needed the storm drainage system, but
were paying taxes on it for the shopping center's benefit.
Pufahl also stated concern about the speed of traffic on
the road.
Pill Horn, 11375 Boulder Pay Road, stated that he believed
the process was mainly for Lunds and.atated objection to
the way the aFulessment was proposed. Horn believed that
the sidewalk was not necessary.
Pentley stated that Frani° Road needed to be improved
whether Lunds was there or not, and believed that
utilities should have been provided before this time and
that waiting would only increase the costs. Bentley
commented that the City orders in projects that are in the
bust interest of the health, safety and welfare needs of
the rusidents and if the City deemed necessary the project
would go ahead and the properties assessed accordingly.
Diets explained to the residents the alternatives
available to them at the assessment hearing.
No further comments from the audience.
MOTION:
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to close the Public
hearing and to adopt Resolution Ho. 88-82 Ordering Street
and Utility Improvements to Frani.° Road, I.C. 52-132.
Motion carried unanimously.
/40
City Council Minutes 20 May 17, 1988
M OTTO!
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to direct staff to
consider recommendations at the assessment hearing which
would provide deferment opportunities for all the
homesteaded properties. Motion carriod unanimously.
P. BLOSSOM RIDGE 2ND ADDITION by G. William Pearson. Request
for Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 6.32
acres, and Preliminary Plat of 6.32 acres into 14 single
family lots and road right-of-way. Location: South of
Elo.;som Road, east of Windsor Terrace. (Ordinance 420-88,
Rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5; Resolution 488-85,
Preliminary Plat)
Jullie reported that notice of this Public Hearing was
published on May 4 in the Eden Prairie News and mailed to
12 property owners.
The proponent stated that all ordinance requirements had
been met.
Peterson asked Enger is this development affects in any
way the concerns of Pastor Penning of Prairie Lutheran
Church regarding access to the south. Enger replied that
access to the south was being provided.
Contloy questioned how would a storm drainage system be
paid for. Proponent replied that they would provide the
storm drainage. Bentley questioned the development of the
storm sewer to be provided in the future for properties to
the oast and who would pay for this in the future. Dietz
replied that the pipe size would be nominal and of no
significant expense, but would be continued on by the
developers of the properties to the east.
Bentley then questioned if there was a pipe from this
development to the basin. Dietz replied no, that it has
an outlet at the property line. Bentley questioned if a
pipe would be necessary and if it would be part of .1 road
system. Dietz replied a pipe would be necessary and would
possibly be part of an adjoining project.
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to close the Public
Horing and approve 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 20-88 for
Rezoning. Motion carried nnanimou-ly.
MITT °H:
Pldcock moved, seconded by Bentley to adopt Resolution No.
88-85 for Preliminary Plat Approval. Motion carried
unanimously.
City Council Minutes 71 May 17, 1083
MoTTON:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson to direct Staff to
prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission
and Staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously.
F. FRANK BEDDOR PROPERTY by Fortier & Associates, Inc.
Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Public
Open Space to Industrial on 20 acre:, Zoning District
Change from I-Cen to I-5 on 18.7 acres, and from R1-22 to
I-5 on 19.3 acres for construction of a 250,000 square
foot industrial building. Location: Northeast corner of
Highway 5 and West 134th Street.
Enger stated that the developer had requested a
continuance for 60 day:.
Bentley asked if the proponent came back with a completely
different project, would the proponent have to wait if
there was a denial by the Council. Pauly replied that
they would not have to wait, but if there was a
significJint difference it would have to go through the
Planning Commission.
Eentloy moved, socondod hy Harris to close the Public
Hearing and direct Staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial
with Findings to be reviewed and considered at the June 7
Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
C. WYNDHAM NOR ADDITION by Burl Corporation. Request for
Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 7.95
acres, Prelminary Plat of 30.03 acres into 14 single
family lot:, one outlot and road right-of-way. Location:
South of Townline Road, east of Dell Road, west of
Purgatory Creek. (Ordinance 821-88, Rezoning from Rural
to R1-12.5; Resolution 838-86, Preliminary Plat.)
Jullie reported that notice of this Public Hearing was
published on May 4 in the Eden Prairie News and mailed to
40 property owners.
Mr. Patton representing the proponent presented the
project. Patton stated that a meeting had taken place
with the DNR and US Army Corps of Engineers to address
their rancor s o . A 40-foot pad would be placed on the
eastern portion of the property to minimize the
encroachment to the wetland area and the DNR had agreed to
this solution. The US Army Corps of Engineers was
concerned about the western portion of the property and a
plan for a 10-foot pad had also been submitted to the US
Army Corps of Englneers. Patton also stated that the tree
rsplocement plan was to plant a tree with a 3" trunk
City Council Minutes
22 May 17, 1988
diameter for each lot, alony with addlti oriial berminy and
Landscaping.
Fnger reported that the Plann i ng C..anmizsion reviewed thin
item at the April 21, 1908 meeting and was recommended fur
approval subject to the Staff Report of April 22, 1933.
Lambert reported that the Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission reviewed this item at the May 2, 1988
meeting and recommended approval with a 6-0 vote. There
were no trail requirements.
Dietz stated that it was his understanding that the City
had been petitioned for watermain improvements. Dietz
asked Patton if arrangements had been made to get
watermain through the property and if this had been
discussed with adjacent property owners. Dietz stated
that the watermain for this project would be contingent on
a special assessment agreement with possibly an unwilling
Property owner to the west.
Bentley questioned this being contingent on a special
assessment agreement. Dietz replied that it should be a
feasibility study and apprapriate hearing. Bentley
queotioned if thin was being recommended as a condition of
the 2nd Reading. Dietz replied yes.
Pose Mingo, 7601 Great Plains Dlvd., Chanhassen, stated
that there preently was a large amount of water run off
from Hidden Glen. Mingo stated that according to grading
plans the proponent intends to fill in 7' on the western
portion and Mingo believed this would create another water
problem for her property. Patton replied that based on
the convernation with the DNR this area would be
unbuildable.
Cal Sachman, 18799 Harrogate Drive, stated that he had
submitted a petition on behalf of the homeowners stating
that they believed that further development by Berl
Corporation in the area of Wyndam Knoll Park on Dell Road
should be taLled for a period of two weeks or whatever was
necessary for the City Staff and homeowners to re-evaluate
the Developer's commitment to fulfill the past promises
for providing a park for the neighborhood.
Sachman suggested a meeting he net for Staff, homeowners
and thr developer to determine a timetable for the parks
completion. Sachman further commented that the children
were using the streets as their playground and the
hsmeowners were ready to take whatever action necessary to
see that the promise for the playground was fulfilled.
Lambert reported that negotiations with the developer had
been taking place regarding the grading of the irk and a
City Council Minutes 23 Hay 17, 1988
letter was sent out today stating that the City would
accept the park in its present condition and consider the
grading complete. A meeting had been scheduled for the
next Monday to meet with the neighbors to discuss the
plans for a tot let. structure. The park would be seeded
next week, with the possibility of the necessity to reseed
agin in August. Lambert further stated that the park
would be usable; however, backstops would not be put ',10 at
time to discourage play on the hallfields. A rock
base would be provided at this time for the parking lot
and next year an asphalt parking lot and tennis courts
would be installed.
Patton stated that they had only taken on the obligation
of the park approximately a little over a year ago. Other
developers had promised the park and hod failed. Patton
believed that they had worked in .;;ood faith with the City.
PiLlsock asked Mrs. Mingo if she was concerned about the
water and drainage. Mingo replied that she still believed
this would add further water problems to her property.
Patton replied that the low spot and drain swale was
developed and would drain into a pond.
Pent; by Cl:. en rood about this project being premature.
This project would require sewer and water to be
installed. There was not a commitment to install sewer
and water. Bentley stated that he was not in favor of
this project proceeding at this time, but would accept a
continuance if the proponent could get a guarantee from
the adjacent property owner. Bentley further stated that
he did not favor granting a 1st Reading contingent upon
utilities being accepted. Patton replied that the
development had sewer.
Ancion Patton how long it would take to resolve
the water issue. Patton questioned what was wrong with
the feasibility study. Peterson replied the request was
Inc a lot Reading, but the project could not go until the
feasibility study was complete. The other possibility
would be ta or this item until the feasibility study
was done.
MOTION:
Pidsock moved, seconded by Harris to close the Public
Hearing and approve let Reading of Ordinance No. 21-81 for
Rezoning.
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to amend the motion as
fl lee Contingent upon all appropriate permits required
by the PNR, Watershed District, and UP Army Corps of
Fngineere— 2n1 Reading shall nst he held until such
Lermits and or ',:--701vc ..0 And review e d by
City Council Minutes 21 Nay 17, 1288
the sity staff. If permits are not received and if
changes to the plan are required the proponent shall
return to the Planning Commission and the City Council for
additional review. Zoning also would be contingent upon a
5atiL,factrary completion of the feasibility study for
utility installation to the site. Motion carried
unanimously.
Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION:
Pilcock moved, seconded by Parris to !dept Resolnti,.n No.
30-18 for Prelis:nary Plat AppayJoal. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION:
Pldcock moved, seconded by Harris to direct Staff to
prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission
and Staff recommendations and all amendments.
Anderson asked Lambert if any scenic easements were
required. Lambert replied that on Outlot A there was a
portion dedicated to the City, which then would not
require an easement. If the proponent would not dedicate
this portion then an easement would be required.
Peterson requested that Lambert continue communications
with Mr. Zachman regarding the park.
Motion carried unanimously.
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOTION:
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve Payment of Claims
No. 422C8 to Nu. 42581. Anderson, Bentley, Harris, Pidcock
and Peterson voting "Aye".
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. Draft Ordinance regarding Recreational Vehicles
Jullie reported the outline of the draft as allowing two
recreational vehicles to be stored, that those over 7' in height could not be closer than 10' from any lot line and
that they may be parked only in the driveway in the front
yard not closer than 15 from the street. If the vehicle
were undcr 7' it could he stored anywhere on It hi
not closer than 15' from the street. Jullie believed this
draft to be consistent with ordinances from other
communities and could be enforced reasonably. If the
/667
City Council Minutes May 17, 1388
Council would approve this draft then a puhlic hearing
would he scheduled.
Mr. Bernadine Moser, 72C3 Topview, stated that the reason
for tht. petition was the large boat being stored only 7'
from her propeLty line. The boat was covered with a blue
tarp and was being stored from September through April.
The boat could be nten for several blocks. Moser believed
the height to be approximately lf to 20 feet. Moser also
believed that this decreased the value of her property.
Moser said that she would like to see the ordinance
regulate length, height, length of time stored, and where
it could be stored on the lot.
Don Bridge, 7272 Gerard Drive, questioned a provision for
temporary parking and the reasoning for the 15 feet from
the street. Jullie replied that this was to eliminate
problems with sight distance and 15 feet was what Edina
had currently. Bridge believed 5 feet would be adequate.
Pidcock was concerned about addressing other types of
vohicics, such :15 extra cars In the backyards, etc.
Peterson replied that the vehicles have to be licensed to
he stored. Jullie stated at the current time there was
not a restriction on the number of cars stored. Bentley
requested to have Staff look at current ordinances to see
if this type of storage was covered under one that the
City currently had.
Peterson suggested scheduling A special Council Meeting
for Council Member discussion hoforo putting this on the
agenda for a public hearing.
Bentley commented that he liked the language in the
Bloomington ordinance.
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, sercolded by Pentley to have a discussion on
thin item at the next C.,tuucil Meeting and to set a public
hearing aftr this. Xetion carried unanimously.
B. Resolution sukportina the continuation of the_MTC contr:20:
for the Southwest Metro Fixed Route Transit Service and
the Dial-A-Ride contract with the City of Shakopee,
Resolution No. 813 -313.
M077cM:
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to adopt Resolution No.
37-09. Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes 26 May 17, 1988
Vi T. PETITI:IMS„REQUESTS COMMNNIC=CNS
A. R,..Li1.;e31. from "A Minnesota Fectival cf Mud':"
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to approve the
recommendation for "A Minnesota Festival of Music."
Motion carried unanimously.
VIII. REPORTS OF AnVISORY COMMISSIONS
IX. APPOINTMENTS
A. A.pointment of Council member to the Southwest Suburban
Cable T.V. Commission
Bentley nominated Pidseck for City representative to the
Southwest Suburban Cable TV Commission. Harris seconded
the nomination. Pidcock accepted.
MOTT
Bentley moved, seconded by Parris to cast a unanimous
ballot. Motion carried unanimously.
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Peterson requested a special meeting be scheduled to
discuss ,recycling and set timetables to proceed.
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson to schedule a Special
Meeting of the City Council for June 7, 1988. Motion
carried unanimously.
2. Pidcock requestod that an ordinance be drafted to bury
all future utility lines.
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, accorded by Anderson to direct Staff to
draft an ordinance to bury all future utility lines.
Motion carried unanimously.
3. Harris reported that Pidcock had been selected as a
member of the ChAirman's Advisory Committee by the
Chairman of the Regional Transit Board, Elliott
Pcrovich. Pidcock had been selected out of
approximately 50 applicants.
City Council Minutes 27 May 17, 1938
B. R ,1112:20: Ot CitLy Manager
1. Yard Waste Recycling Service
Jullic reported that bids had been received. This was not
in the budget and it would be at a significant cost.
Anderson stated that it was late in the year and he would
strongly urge that the Council wait, but work to make
earlier provisions for a program in the Fall.
Peterson stated that for this type of project publicity
would be necessary to have it work effectively.
MOTION:
Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock to reject both bids
and not offer summer program, but be prepared to offer a
yard waste recycling program for the fall. Motion carried
unanimously.
C. Report of Cit_y_Attorney .
No Report.
D. Report of Director of Plannin_g
Ms PcTsrt.
F. Pellprt Nr2.c.tor_gf Parks_ Recrea_tim_S_Naturad
Re our ce
1. Child Care at the Community Center
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to continue child care
at the Community Center.
Harris complimented the Staff for good programing and
quality care. Harris stated that this was a new direction
and addressed the creativity in the community.
Bentley offered a word of caution, hoping that this was
not allowed to get out of control.
Anderson requested cr„;oiny reports as to the progress of
the program. Lambert replied that a report would be
available at the end of each season.
City Council Minutes 28 May 17, 1088
F. Report of Director Of PUblle WOrtzl:
1. E.quipment Maintenance Staffing_Chanocs
Bentley asked Jullie what was the status of the disability
plan, not just workmen compensation. Jullie replied that
the City had a disability plan that is co-ordinated with
the other benefit programs.
Bentley questioned If the employee had been collecting on
this plan and what the waiting period was for short-term
disability.
Diet: replied that the employee waL; on the job and now had
a 30-pound lifting restriction.
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to approve Staff
recommendation. Motion carried unanimously.
C. Reaort of Fironce, DliPetOr
No Report.
XI. NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 1:18 AM.
MP\
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
August 9, 1988
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.)
Blessing & Associates Construction
Capitol Construction Group, Inc.
Crawford-Merz Construction Co.
Elder-Jones, Inc.
Feder Plumbing & Heating
Hauenstein & Burmeister, Inc.
Marco Construction Co.
Margolis Brothers Company
Morcon Construction, Inc.
J. F. O'Neill & Associates
PCI Professional Interior Const.
Petal Pushers
Renier Enterprises
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY)
Action Plus Construction
All American Recreation, Inc.
R. M. Baker Company
Berg & Associates Design
J. Brolsma Construction
Danny's Construction
Josey, Inc. DBA Mr. Handyman
Larson Remodeling
Modern Concept Builders, Inc.
P & B Carpentry, Inc.
Patio Village, Inc.
Unibilt, Inc.
Virga Corporation
PLUMBING
Available Plumbing, Inc.
Crown Plumbing
Feder Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Gezel Plumbing
Krumholz Company
Nieman Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Prairie Plumbing Company
HEATING & VENTILATING
Burnsville Heating & Air Conditioning
Feder Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Metro Brothers Heating & Air Conditioning
St. Marie Sheet Metal, Inc.
Three D. Heating Company
GAS FITTER
Burnsville Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc
Krumholz Company
Southside Heating & Air Conditioning
St. Marie Sheet Metal, Inc.
Three D Heating
These licenses have been approved by the department head
s
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
f
o
r
the licensed activity.
rj,L;AL
Pat Solie
Licensing
/ 9.S
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-155
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
WYNDHAM KNOB
WHEREAS, the plat of WYNDHAM KNOB has been submitted in a manner required for
platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of
the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for WYNDHAM KNOB is approved upon compliance
with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat
dated AUGUST 2, 1988.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of
this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named
plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the
certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon
compliance with the foregoing prov:sions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on AUGUST 9, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
/67g
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technicia
DATE: August 2, 1988
SUBJECT: WYNDHAM KNOB
PROPOSAL: Burl Corporation has requested City Council
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
t
h
e
f
i
n
a
l
plat of Wyndham Knob, a single family residential su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
south of W. 62nd Street, east of Dell Road in the nor
t
h
h
a
l
f
o
f
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
6. Formerly Outlot C of Wyndham Crest, the plat contai
n
s
2
9
.
4
8
a
c
r
e
s
t
o
be divided into 14 single family lots, 1 outlot,
a
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
dedication for street purposes. Outlot A contains 22
.
0
3
a
c
r
e
s
a
n
d
i
s
intended to be dedicated to the City for conservation p
u
r
p
o
s
e
s
.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
a
y
1
7
,
1
9
8
8
,
per Resolution 88-86.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this rep
o
r
t
w
a
s
e
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
July 19, 1988.
Second reading of Ordinance #21-88, changing zoning f
r
o
m
r
u
r
a
l
t
o
R
1
-
13.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council
J
u
l
y
1
9
,
1
9
8
8
.
VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the
B
o
a
r
d
o
f
Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities, roadwa
y
s
,
a
n
d
w
a
l
k
w
a
y
s
w
i
l
l
be installed throughout the plat in conformance with C
i
t
y
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
a
n
d
the requirements of the Developer's Agreement. Prior t
o
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
final plat, Developer shall submit to the City a temp
o
r
a
r
y
c
u
l
-
d
e
-
s
a
c
easement for the street terminus on the west line of th
e
p
l
a
t
.
PARK DEDICATION: Prior to the release of the final plat, the Develop
e
r
s
shall convey to the City, by warranty deed, Outlot A.
The remaining requirements for park dedication are covered in t
h
e
Developer's Agreement.
/6'75
Page 2 of 2
WYNDHAM KNOB August 2, 1988
BONDING: Bonding shall conform to City Code and the Develoepr's Agreement.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Wyndham Knob subject
to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the
following:
1. Receipt of street sign fee of $712.00.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee of $2,484.00.
3. Receipt of engineering fee of $560.00.
4. Receipt of warranty deed for Outlot A.
5. Satisfaction of bonding requirements.
6. Receipt of temporary cul-de-sac easement.
JJ:ss
cc: Burl Corporation
New Concept Homes
James R. Hill, Inc.
Res: 88-155
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation 84 Natural Resources
July 27, 1988
Bids for Phase II Partial Repairs to the Eden Prairie Community
Center
Attached is a copy of the bid tabulation for Phase II of the Partial Repairs
Project for the Eden Prairie Community Center. This project will include
completion of repairs necessary due to the problems caused during construction
either by design or poor construction methods.
The base bid includes constructing a painted concrete block wall around the
existing concrete block walls in order to complete the proper enclosure of the
building. The alternate 1 is an add alternate" that would install a brick
outer wall rather than concrete block.
The parks, recreation and natural resources staff recommend the low bid of
Watson Forsberg for the base bid of $331,000, plus the alternate No. 1 of
$79,000 for a brick exterior to match the first phase brick, for a total bid
of $410,000.
The architect's estimate for the base bid, plus alternate was $546,000. The
City received five bids ranging from $410,000 to $574,000.
The proposed funding source for this project is cash park fees that would be
reimbursed upon completion of the litigation associated with this project.
The cost of the alternate, which would be "improving" the building from a
painted block building to a brick building, would not be covered by the
litigation.
BL:mdd
°°- P#4
BID TABULATION
PHASE TWO - PARTIAL REPAIRS TO EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER
EDEN PRAIR E, MINNESOTA
f848,^02.06-
BIDDERS
BASE
BID
ALTERNATE
fl
„MIT PRICE
fl
PER SQ FT
UNIT PRICE
02
PER SO FT
BID
BOND
AMOUNT SURETY COMPANY
CHANGE ORDERS
ADDEND
fl
ADONS DEDUCTS
CONTIT SUB GONER SUB
CATES CONSTRUCTION
A00 HIGHWAY 55
HAMEL, 1114 55340 4-8,6009 .gizeal 0,.0o . 3b YEG
CNA WS. Ca
2o IO 0 0 y ‘s
r5 CALIBUR CONTRACTING
4 NW 3RD ST., SUITE 11
ELK RIVER, MN 55330
MO
C. F. HAGLIN AND SONS CO.
4005 WEST 65TH STREET
EDINA, MN 55435
i'ybelpoo e/7266 5.9) •zr v5s, AEF11-JA
INGUP\ WQ,C 10 0 o Yes
X M BUILDING COMPANY, INC.
!620 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E.
1INNEAPOLIS, MN 55418
A r-pa4k 4.1.0t51(AAJ lif.AINS
1,0)41,/ G. A A
-.1 .V41 .V- IrS °24124
-rartwc...e.
65R4r4S
/ A
i Li
C., Zi C,
Z.) 0 YEG
1ELSON BROS. CONSTR. CO .
1216 SELBY AVENUE
( T. PAUL, MN 55104
NO oLo
,21PECO CONTRACTING, INC.
P23 E. SEVENTH STREET
-4...,
• MN 55106 KO f3a2
( ., JCTION, INC. lot xruis sr. N. E.
1INNEAPOLIS, MN 55434
5q;cebetzoot) 5.,00 •25 tie's OiLEAT 4*(21CAV
1NSU (244.1X CA 6 0 5 3 ye.;
ATSON-FORSBERG
252 SOUTH PLAZA BLDG.
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416
i331011110 :76140 6 ,0 . 22. yes
Wing) STAngS
n Otndrrif 44 1,44,,,,ri 44,. 16 to o 0 yEs
____
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-156
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
ALPINE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of ALPINE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION has been submitted in a
manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and
under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly
had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for ALPINE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION is approved
upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
report on this plat dated AUGUST 4, 1988.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of
this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named
plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the
certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon
compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on AUGUST 9, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technicia
DATE: August 4, 1988
SUBJECT: ALPINE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION
PROPOSAL: The Developers, Red Rock Heights Partnership, have requested City
Council approval of the final plat for Alpine Estates 2nd Addition, a
single family residential subdivison located east of County Road 4,
south of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railway, in the
south half of Section 5. The plat contains 8.36 acres to be divided
into 16 single family lots and a right-of-way dedication for street
purposes.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on April 5,
1988 per Resolution 88-51.
Second reading of Ordinance 6-88, changing zoning from the R1-22
District to the R1-13.5 District, was finally read and approved at the
City Council meeting held May 17, 1988.
The Developers Agreement referred to within this report was executed May
17, 1988.
VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of
Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities, roadways and walkways will
be installed throughout the plat in comformance with the City's
Standards and the requirements of the Developer's Agreement.
Prior to release of the final plat the Developer shall submit temporary
cul-de-sac easements to provide a turn-around at the eastern terminus of
Alpine Trail.
In order to serve this site with sanitary sewer, it is necessary to
extend sanitary sewer across the property to the East; therefore, prior
to release of the final plat the Developer shall provide the City with
recordable easement documents over the proposed sanitary sewer line.
Page 2 of 2
ALPINE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION August 4, 1988
This project is subject to the tree preservation policy of Eden
Prairie. Prior to release of the final plat, the Developer shall
provide the City with a bond to cover the tree replacement as outlined
in the tree replacement plan previously submitted.
PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the
Developer's Agreement.
BONDING: Bonding must conform to City Code and the Developer Agreement.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Alpine Estates 2nd
Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's
Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of street sign Fee of $260.00.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee of $1,890.00.
3. Recepit of engineering fee of $640.00.
4. Receipt of temporary cul-de-sac easement for Alpine Trail.
5. Receipt of recordable easement documents the for extension of
sanitary sewer across the property to the East.
6. Satisfaction of bonding requirements.
7. Receipt of tree replacement bond.
8. Revision of plat to include a 15-foot drainage and utility easement
along the east line of lot 8 block 2.
JJ:ss
cc: Red Rock Heights Partnership
Ron Krueger and Associates
88-156
!A l
RILEY-PURGATORY-BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
AND
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Cooperative Agreement
Study For Surface Water Profiles of
Purgatory Creek and Other Public Waters
Within the City of Eden Prairie
I. PARTIES
The Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District
(hereinafter "District"), and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter
"Eden Prairie"), acting by and through their respective governing
bodies, enter into this Cooperative Agreement by reason of and in
recognition of the fact that the overall water and related land
management plans for the District and Eden Prairie will be affected
by the actions of each of these public bodies in adopting or
permitting water and land uses or programs inconsistent with the
District's overall plan objectives for the protection, maintenance
and enhancement of public water areas within the District.
II. PROJECT AREA
The land and water areas subject to this agreement are
generally described as those reaches of Purgatory Creek within the
City of Eden Prairie impacted by the undertakings herein described,
as well as other watercourses and waterbodies tributary to
Purgatory Creek both within and without the City of Eden Prairie
and those affected reaches of Purgatory Creek outside the municipal
limits of Eden Prairie necessary to study in order to accomplish
the purpose of this undertaking.
672
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION - SURFACE WATER STUDY
The purpose of this Study will be to do an analysis of the
Purgatory Creek surface water drainage system in and near the
following surface water sub-drainage areas, to wit:
a. Hillcrest Court
b. Edenvale Golf Course
C. Neill Lake
Upon completion of the analysis, a final report will be prepared
and submitted to the District and Eden Prairie detailing the
findings of the Surface Water Study and outlining alternatives
available to implement further the surface water management plan
for the general project area.
IV. OBLIGATION OF DISTRICT
Subject to Article V below, the District agrees to
undertake the preparation and completion of the Surface Water Study
in accordance with Article III herein. The District agrees that it
will complete such study by October 5, 1988 and present that study
to the City Council of Eden Prairie within one month following
completion and acceptance of the Surface Water Study by the Board
of Managers of the District.
V. OBLIGATION OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Eden Prairie agrees to do all necessary field survey work
and furnish that data to the District and its consulting engineers
doing the analysis and final report. Such information shall be
-2-
IQ3
completed and furnished by Eden Prairie no later than August 1,
1988.
VI. COSTS OF THE SURFACE WATER STUDY
Including the cost to obtain all reasonable and necessary
field survey work to complete the Surface Water Study, the District
agrees to assume and be responsible for the payment of the Surface
Water Study, which cost shall not exceed $38,000. In the event the
total project costs exceed the sum of $38,000, the District agrees
to complete the entire project as agreed upon and pay for all costs
in excess of the parties financial obligations as specified in
Article VII herein.
VII. ALLOCATION OF PROJECT COSTS; METHOD OF PAYMENT
Except as provided for in Article VI for payment of excess
project costs, Eden Prairie and the District hereby assume and
agree to pay one-half of the actual project costs for which
individual obligations in no event shall exceed the sum of $19,000
for each party to this Agreement.
It is agreed and understood that the field survey work to
be undertaken and completed by Eden Prairie shall be the obligation
of Eden Prairie, and which costs shall be charged by Eden Prairie
as its actual costs. Such work shall be completed by Eden Prairie
at a total cost not to exceed $19,000. Eden Prairie shall be
credited for its share of the costs to complete the Surface Water
Study in an amount equal to the actual costs of the field survey
work done. Upon sutmission to Eden Prairie of the completed
-3-
Surface Water Study and an invoice detailing the actual costs and
expenses incurred by the District, including those actual costs
incurred by Eden Prairie in performing the field survey work, each
party agrees to pay its equal share of the costs of the Surface
Water Study and remit, if necessary, any amount owing by either
party to the other in accordance with this Article VII.
VIII. FURTHER OBLIGATIONS AND UNDERTAKINGS
The completion of and submission to Eden Prairie of the
Surface Water Study shall in no way obligate either of the parties
to this Agreement to undertake further actions and/or proceedings
which might be recommended in the final report unless and until the
parties may agree in writing to any such further undertaking,
commitments and obligations.
This agreement shall be in force and effect upon execution
by the parties in the manner set -forth in a resolution of the
respective governing bodies approving the agreement and authorizing
the execution of this document.
Dated:
Dated:
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By
And
RILEY-PURGATORY-BLUFF CREEK
WATERSHED DISTRICT
By
And 6302n &V."
-MEMORANDUM-
TO: Mayor Peterson and Council Members
FROM: Alan Gray, P.E.
City Engineer
)
DATE: August 4, 1988
RE: Petition for Watermain Extension on
Pioneer Trail West of Mitchell Road
The owners and developers of the residential subdivision known as
Starring Lake 2nd Addition have petitioned the City of Eden
Prairie for the extension of trunk watermain along CSAH 1 from
Mitchell Road westerly to the proposed subdivision. The project
would extend westerly along the north side of CSAH 1 for
approximately 1850 feet. This trunk watermain project would also
provide lateral benefit to the Starring Lake 2nd Addition as
well as ten single family lots in the Starring Lake 1st Addition.
The extension of the trunk watermain to Starring Lake 2nd
Addition at this time would allow for the installation of lateral
watermain and eliminate the need for new homes to construct
wells.
The petition by the developers of the Starring Lake 2nd Addition
represents slightly less than 35% of the properties that would
benefit from the installation of the watermain. It is therefore
recommended that the project proceed based on Council motion and
the affirmative vote of at least four Council members.
ADG:ss
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 88-160
RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND
ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT
WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed to make the following
improvements:
I.C. 52-149 (Watermain Extension on Pioneer Trail)
and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the
improvements, pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Chapter 429.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council:
That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study
with the assistance of RCM, Inc., and that a feasibility report shall be
prepared and presented to the City Council with all convenient speed
advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost
assessment and feasibility of the proposed improvements.
ADOPTEd by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 9, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
I 03
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
WATER WORKS IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. 52-0728
CONTRACT NO. 2
WATER SUPPLY IAPROVEMENTS
SECTION II - WELL HOUSES AND SITE WORK
CHANGE ORDER NO. 4
I. SCOPE
This Change Order No. 4 will adjust the Contract price to account for
the following items: A. Expediting Well House Construction - Time and
Material Costs; B. Substitution of Rigid Insulation and Plywood
Decking; C. Revised Site Drainage at Well No. 8; D. Overexcavation and
Backfill at Well No. 8 Access Road; E. Realignment of Bike Path at
Well No. 8; F. Concrete Thrust Block at Well No. 7; G. Additional
Drainage Culvert at Well No. 7; H. Credit for Reusing Well Pump No. 1
Discharge Head; I. Credit for Deleting Drawdown Gauges; J. Credit for
Actual Cost of Facing Brick; and K. Credit for Roof Drainage
Modifications.
II. CHANGE ORDER ITEMS
A. EXPEDITING WELL HOUSE CONSTRUCTION - TIME AND MATERIAL COSTS
The construction of Well Houses No. 7, 8, and 9 were expedited to
allow the Owner's use as soon as possible as ordered in Change
Order No. 2. The cost of building, handling, maintaining and
heating the temporary enclosures at Well Houses No. 7, 8, and 9,
and snow removal costs at each site, were billed monthly. The
costs were based on actual time and material costs in accordance
with the schedule of costs listed in the letter by Barbarossa and
Sons, Inc. dated November 30, 1987. All costs have been accrued
and billed and these costs are included in this Change Order
No. 4.
B. SUBSTITUTION OF RIGID INSULATION AND PLYWOOD DECKING
The blanket type insulation specified to be installed on the
concrete roof decks of the new well houses shall be deleted, and
4-inch thick rigid type insulation shall be substituted in its
place as directed in Field Order No. 4 dated March 31, 1988. A
minimum 1/4-inch thick plywood shall be installed on the rigid
insulation as directed in Field Order No. 4A dated April 13,
1988. The rigid type insulation and plywood shall be as
specified in Sections 7E and 6A, respectively.
A2JAG070188 C04-1
/67 3.
C. REVISED SITE DRAINAGE AT WELL NO. 8
The site drainage at Well No. 8 shall be revised as directed in
Field Order No. 1 dated March 11, 1988. The revised site
drainage shall delete a drainage swale, and add an area inlet and
153 feet of 18-inch corrugated metal pipe.
D. OVEREXCAVATION AND BACKFILL AT WELL NO. a ACCESS ROAD
The unsuitable soils encountered at Well No. 8 access road shall
be removed by overexcavation and compacted granular backfill
shall be installed as directed in Field Order No. 5 dated
April 15, 1988.
E. REALIGNMENT OF BIKE PATH AT WELL NO. 8
The bike path at Well No. 8 shall be realigned in accordance with
the City's instructions in order to minimize the curve near its
intersection with the access road. The pedestrian curb ramp
shall be relocated and approximately 33 feet of additional bike
path shall be replaced.
F. CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK AT WELL NO. 7
A concrete thrust block shall be installed on the 16-inch well
collector line at Well No. 7 as directed in Field Order No. 3
dated March 31, 1988.
G. ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE CULVERT AT WELL NO. 7
The 18-inch corrugated metal pipe at Well No. 7 shall be extended
45 feet to provide proper site drainage after relocation of the
well.
H. CREDIT FOR REUSING WELL PUMP NO. 1 DISCHARGE HEAD
A credit shall be provided for reusing the existing pump
discharge head and baseplate at Well Pump No. 1 in lieu of
providing a new discharge head and baseplate as specified.
I. CREDIT FOR DELETING DRAWDOWN GAUGES
A credit shall be provided for deleting the drawdown gauges for
Well Pumps No. 1, 7, 8, 9 and 10, which were specified in Section
11A-6.12.
J. CREDIT FOR ACTUAL COST OF FACING BRICK
A credit shall be provided for the difference in cost between the
allowance provided for in Section 4A-4 and the actual cost of the
selected facing brick.
A2JAG070188 C04-2
1N9
K. CREDIT FOR ROOF DRAINAGE MODIFICATIONS
All gutters, downspouts, and splash blocks shall be deleted, and
water diverters shall be installed on the roofs above doors D3,
D6, D7, and DO in accordance with Engineer's letter dated May 13,
1988 and the attached Figure C04-1. A credit shall be provided
for the cost savings of the modifications.
III. CHANGES IN CONTRACT AMOUNT
Adjustments to the Contract price resulting from the aforementioned
items shall be the following negotiated lump sum prices:
Item Amount
A. Expediting Well House Construction - Time and $ 55,747.00
Material Costs
B. Substitution of Rigid Insulation and Plywood
Decking
C. Revised Site Drainage at Well No. 8
D. Overexcavation and Backfill at Well No. 8
Access Road
4,819.00
5,769.00
15,276.00
E. Realignment of Bike Path at Well No. 8 2,356.00
F. Concrete Thrust Block at Well No. 7
1,954.00
G. Additional Drainage Culvert at Well No. 7
1,262.00
H. Credit for Reusing Well Pump No. 1 Discharge Head (350.00)
I. Credit for Deleting Drawdown Gauges (725.00)
J. Credit for Actual Cost of Facing Brick
(667.00)
K. Credit for Roof Drainage Modifications (2,139.00)
Total - Change Order No. 4
$ 83,302.00
The net change to the Contract price is summarized as follows:
Current Contract Price $1,584,220.50
Change Order No. 4
83,302.00
New Contract Price $1,667,522.50
A2JAG070188 C04-3
IV. ACCEPTANCE
The changes and conditions set forth in this Change Order No. 4 are
hereby accepted. All other provisions of the Contract, including
Contract time, remain unchanged.
BARBAROSSA AND SONS, INC. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
(Contractor)
(Owner)
By By
Director of Public Works
Date Date
A2JAG070188 C04-4
Braces or each end and intermediate
braces at 2 - 0 -ctrs max Mrammmurn
Dryer ter 6 braces per dryer ter
Bead
BLACK & VEATCH
ENGINEERS.ARCHITECTS
maim'
I2106.CPS
EDEN PRAIRIE ,MINNESOTA
WATER SUPPLY IMPROVEMENTS DAM MAY 13,1988
WELL HOUSES AND SITE WORK
WATER DIVERTER FIGURE C04—I P. Cyv- 009-8 Notes:
1. Water diverter shall be provided at doors 0-3, 0-6, D-7, and
0-8 at each well house.
2. Each diverter shall be of such length to extend 241" beyond
each side of the doors below.
3. Diverter, cleats, and braces shall be constructed of 26
gauge galvanized steel.
4. Construction shall be in accordance with recommendations of
Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors National
Association publication, "Architectural Sheet Metal Manual,
3rd Edition".
Irma
RELEASE OF LAND
This Release of Land is executed by the Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
e
n
Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"
)
,
a
n
d
i
s
d
a
t
e
d
as of August 9, 1988
FACTS
1. A certain Agreement Regarding Special Assessm
e
n
t
s
("Agreement") dated December 5, 1984 , was executed by and
between the City, Hestia Homes, Inc.
which Agreement was filed as Document No. 1619766
the Hennepin County Recorder on December 31, 1984
Agreement related to the property described there
i
n
a
s
:
Prairie Knoll Addition
Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesota
with
. The
2. The special assessments contemplated by the Agree
m
e
n
t
have been levied and the time for appeal has exp
i
r
e
d
.
103
Page -2-
3. To evidence the fact that the special assessments have
been levied and the time for appeal has expired, the City is
executing this Release of Land.
THEREFORE, the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal
corporation, hereby releases the Property described above from
all obligations and conditions set forth in the Agreement
Regarding Special Assessments dated December 5, 1984 filed
with the Hennepin County Recorder as Document No. 1619766
on December 31, 1984 This Release of Land shall not
release or discharge the Property from the lien of any special
assessments levied by the City pursuant to the Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Eden Prairie has executed
the foregoing instrument.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,
A Municipal Corporation
BY:
Gary D. Peterson
Its Mayor
BY:
Carl J. Jullie
Its City Manager
Page -3-
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of
, 1988, by Gary D. Peterson and Carl J.
Jullie, the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a
municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota,
on behalf of said corporation.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
Lang, Pauly & Gregerson, Ltd.
230 Suburban National Bank
300 Prairie Center Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
#7--RELEASE.C
RFR/01-14-88
CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 6
TO CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 51-272
VALLEY VIEW ROAD, COUNTY ROAD 4 TO MITCHELL ROA
D
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
BRIA/ Copy -
City, Copy
Contractor Copy
COpy
B.R.W. Inc.
AUG 0 1 1988
RECEIVED
July 1988
The following work shall be added by contract to
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
ADDITIONS
BENNETT-RINGROSE-WOLSFELD-
JARVIS-GARDNER, INC.
700 Third Street South
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Seq. No. Mn/DOT No.
Item
Unit
1) Time and Materials on
Catch Basin Manhole 18 LS
2) Time and Materials on
Sidewalk Damage
IS
3) 84 SF Sidewalk
Payment No. 17
LS
4) Sediment Trap and Flow
Control Pipes
LS
5) 64 LF RCP Removal
Payment No. 17
LS
Total Additions, Contract
Amendment No. 6
Estimated
Uoit
Quantity
Price
Amount
1 $ 478.00 $ 478.00
1 $ 607.50 $ 607.50
1 $ -176.40 $ -176.40
$1,178.50 $1,178.50
1 $ -576.00 $ -576.00
$1,511.60
Necessity for Amendment
Item 1: Top slab and casting needed to be reposi
t
i
o
n
e
d
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
p
u
m
p
i
n
g
o
f
s
u
m
p
b
y
M
a
i
n
-
tenance Department. To be reimbursed to City
by BRW due to staking error.
Item 2: Sidewalk removed during water disconnec
t
o
f
1
2
-
2
3
-
8
7
,
r
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
I
t
e
m
9
,
Contract Amendment No. 5, March 1988.
Item 3: Deduct for payment made under establishe
d
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
t
e
m
N
o
.
1
2
2
.
Item 4: Removal and restoration of RCP sediment
t
r
a
p
s
p
l
a
c
e
d
i
n
c
r
e
e
k
b
e
d
.
Item 5: Deduct for payment made under establishe
d
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
t
e
m
N
o
.
1
1
.
I,
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $2,043,029.90
OTAL PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMENDMENT ADDITIONS 155.923.54
SUBTOTAL $2,198,953.44
TOTAL PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMENDMENT DEDUCTIONS $ 39,840.00
SUBTOTAL $2,159,113.44
TOTAL ADDITIONS CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 6
$ 1,511.60
CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE
$2,160,625.04
CONTRACTOR
Shafer Contracting, Inc. •
Title
Date
7/'?/'-
ENGINEER
Bennett-Ringrose-Wolsfeld-Jarvis-Gardner, Inc. 63da ee0
Title TZZT Date
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
City Engineer
Date
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 88-163
APPROVAL OF CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN RAILROAD
LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR A STORM SEWER CROSSING
ASSOCIATED WITH LEGION PARK SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Public Works Department proposes to construct
utilities associated with the Legion Park subdivision; and
WHEREAS, part of the storm sewer construction involves an underground storm
sewer crossing of the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company
Railroad line for which a license agreement has been prepared.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that t
h
e
license agreement is hereby approved and the Mayor and City Clerk a
r
e
authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 9, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST;
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
CHICAGO AND
TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
July 19, 1988
File: Eden Prairie
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Dear Sir:
I am attaching herewith, in duplicate, proposed agreement with City of
Eden Prairie for storm sewer at Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
Please arrange for execution, attesting or witnessing (as the case may be),
affixing of corporate seal (if corporation), and the return of all copies to
this office. (If public body is involved, furnish certified copy of Resolution
authorizing execution.)
Sincerely,
/
Y. C. Domski
Assistant Divsion Manager-
Engineering
JCD/
Attachment
cc: J. A. Nolin (file 28-27-80)
900 Story Street Boone, Iowa 50036 515/432-3943
/69
Form 2036 - Page 1
kevised 1981
CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY (hereinaft
e
r
c
a
l
l
e
d
"
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
"
)
h
e
r
e
b
y
l
i
-
censes the CITY OF EDEN PRADIE, MINNESOTA (hereinafter cal
l
e
d
"
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
"
)
t
o
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
,
maintain and use a 21 inch storm sewer (hereinafter called "
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
"
)
u
p
o
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
n
d
under the tracks of the Company at Eden Prairie, Minnesota in
t
h
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
,
a
n
d
In accordance with the specifications shown on map dated June
1
4
,
1
9
8
8
h
e
r
e
t
o
a
t
t
a
c
h
e
d
m
a
r
k
e
d
Exhibit "A" and, by this reference, made a part hereof.
The foregoing license given upon such express terms and conditio
n
s
a
s
a
r
e
i
n
s
e
r
t
e
d
b
e
l
o
w
,
as well as those contained upon the subsequent printed pages,
a
n
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
a
t
a
n
y
time violate any of said terms or conditions, or use or attemp
t
t
o
u
s
e
s
a
i
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
f
o
r
a
n
y
other or different purpose than that above specified, then the
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
m
a
y
,
a
t
i
t
s
o
p
t
i
o
n
,
i
m
-
mediately revoke this license.
The foregoing license is subject to the following conditions:
The Licensee shall require its contractor to furnish the Compa
n
y
a
c
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
e
o
f
i
n
s
u
r
-
ance, with the Company named as additional insured, showing a
m
o
u
n
t
s
a
n
d
t
y
p
e
s
o
f
i
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
carried by the contractor which shall provide public liabilit
y
i
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
f
o
r
b
o
d
i
l
y
i
n
j
u
r
y
a
n
d
property damage on behalf of the Company in an amount of n
o
t
l
e
s
s
t
h
a
n
$
2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
c
o
m
b
i
n
e
d
single limits per occurrence. The certificate shall contain a co
m
m
i
t
m
e
n
t
b
y
t
h
e
i
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
c
o
m
-
-any that it will give the Company thirty days advance notice of
a
n
y
c
a
n
c
e
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
o
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
the insurance coverage shown on such certificate. Such insuranc
e
i
s
t
o
b
e
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
Company before the Licensee permits the contractor to proceed
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
a
i
d
f
a
-
cility.
For the privileges herein permitted the Licensee shall pay to
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
,
i
n
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
,
a
charge of One Hundred Eighty Dollars ($180.00) per annum, or f
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
t
h
e
r
e
o
f
,
b
e
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
A
u
g
u
s
t
1, 1988 subject to revision at any anniversary billing date.
FIRST. The work of construction and maintenance shall be done and comp
l
e
t
e
d
i
n
g
o
o
d
and workmanlike manner at the sole expense of the said Licen
s
e
e
.
S
a
i
d
w
o
r
k
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
o
n
e
i
n
such manner as in no way to interfere with or endanger the use
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
r
t
r
a
c
k
s
o
f
t
h
e
Company, or the operation thereon of any engines, cars or tr
a
i
n
s
.
T
h
e
C
h
i
e
f
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
Company shall have the right to inspect such work from time to
t
i
m
e
a
n
d
t
o
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
u
c
h
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
to be made as will in his opinion decrease the hazards inciden
t
t
o
s
a
i
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
;
b
u
t
a
n
y
s
u
c
h
inspection or required changes or any failure to so inspect, o
r
t
o
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
t
o
b
e
m
a
d
e
,
shall not effect any of the obligations assumed by the said Lice
n
s
e
e
h
e
r
e
u
n
d
e
r
.
SECOND. The said Licensee shall bear the cost of all protection which
t
h
e
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
m
a
y
require for its tracks or property during construction and main
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
h
e
r
e
b
y
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
e
d
a
n
d
o
f
all repairs, changes, additions or betterments to said Company
'
s
t
r
a
c
k
o
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
m
a
d
e
n
e
c
e
s
-
sary on account of same. If in the judgement of the Company i
t
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
support for its tracks during the work of construction or maint
e
n
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
w
i
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
such support, and the entire cost thereof will be paid by the
s
a
i
d
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
p
r
o
m
p
t
l
y
u
p
o
n
r
e
-
ceipt of bill therefor.
Form 2036 - Page 3A
Revised 1981
EIGHTH. The Company shall have the right at any time to revoke this license by giving
thirty days notice in writing to the Licensee and at the expiration of the time limited by
said notice, or upon any other revocation of this license, the Licensee shall promptly, and in
the manner directed by said Chief Engineer, remove all construction hereby authorized from
the premises of the Company and leave said premises in the sani condition in which they were
before the installation of the same. Upon default of the Licensee so to do, the Company may
remove the same and restore its premises, and the Licensee will promptly pay to the Company the
cost of so doing.
NINTH. The waiver of a breach of any of the terms or conditions hereof shall be
limited to the act or acts constituting such breach, and shall never be construed as being
a continuing or permanent waiver of any such terms or conditions, all of which shall be and
remain in full force and effect as to future acts or happenings, notwithstanding any such
waiver.
TENTH. This license is personal to said Licensee and is not assignable or
transferable, without the written consent of the Company being first obtained.
ELEVENTH. In further consideration of the Company's giving to the Licensee the rights an
privileges above specified, the Licensee, by the acceptance of this license, hereby agrees that
it will not levy or assess any special tax or special assessment against Company or against or
upon Company's properties for the construction or use of the improvement of which said facility
is a part; and, the Licensee hereby forever indemnifies Company against and agrees to save
Company harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits or liability whatsoever for any
such special tax or special assessment. If notwithstanding the foregoing provisions any such
special tax or special assessment shall be levied or assessed upon or against said Company's
properties, the Company shall have the following elections to wit:
(a) Company may make such payments as may be necessary to satisfy and discharge any lien
for such special tax or special assessment and in case of such payment the Licensee
agrees to make repayment on demand with interest at the rate of five per cent (5%)
per annum from the date of such payment so made by Company.
(b) Company may file this license agreement for recording in the office of the Recorder
of Deeds of the county in which said properties are located and such filing shall
constitute a complete discharge and release of any lien against said Company's
properties for such special tax or special assessment.
Company may terminate this license by filing notice of termination with such Recorde
of Deeds for recording and forwarding a copy thereof through certified or registered
mail, postage prepaid to Licensee whereupon all rights, privileges and interests
herein granted to Licensee shall immediately cease and determine with the right of
Company to make immediate re-entry and without any further obligations or any
liability on the part of Company in respect to any payments, setoffs, counterclaims,
recoupment, crossbills or cross demands.
All rights, remedies and elections of Company shall be cumulative.
TWELFTH. Licensee further agrees that there is no benefit to the Company's properties,
either for railroad use or for any possible use in the future from the construction of the
facility or project of which said facility Is a part.
(c)
Form 2036 - Page 4A
Revised 1981
In Witness Whereof this instrument is executed this day of ,19
ATTEST:
CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
By
Assistant Secretary Vice President - Engineering
Pursuant to authority granted by resolution of the
of the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, adopted
The undersigned, the Licensee mentioned in the foregoing license, hereby accepts the same
subject to the terms and conditions therein stated.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
Attest: By (Seal)
Mayor
City Clerk
K1)2
Form 2036 - Page 2
Revised 1981
THIRD. The Licensee shall pay all taxes, general and special, license fees or other charges which may become due or which may be assessed
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
t
h
e
p
r
e
m
i
s
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
because of the construction, existence, operation or use o
f
s
a
i
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
,
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
,
o
r
t
h
e
business conducted in connection with said facility, and
s
h
a
l
l
r
e
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
f
o
r
a
n
y
such taxes, license fees or other charge which may be p
a
i
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
p
r
o
m
p
t
l
y
u
p
o
n
t
h
e
presentation by the Company of bills therefor. .'
FOURTH. The said Licensee will give to the Chief Engineer of the Co
m
p
a
n
y
a
t
l
e
a
s
t
t
e
n
days' notice in writing before entering upon the right o
f
way of the Company for construction purposes, or for the purpose of making necessary repair
s
.
T
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
s
t
h
e
r
i
g
h
t
t
o
judge of the necessity of repairs to said facility, and
t
o
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
t
o
m
a
k
e
s
u
c
h
repairs upon ten days' notice in writing. In such case
,
s
a
i
d
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
m
a
y
e
n
t
e
r
u
p
o
n
s
a
i
d
right of way without the ten days' notice above referre
d
t
o
,
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
p
r
o
c
e
e
d
f
o
r
t
h
w
i
t
h
t
o
make such repairs, and upon failure to do so within ten da
y
s
,
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
s
h
a
l
l
h
a
v
e
t
h
e
r
i
g
h
t
to make said repairs and collect the entire cost thereo
f
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
.
.
T
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
reserves the right, in case in its opinion the safety of i
t
s
t
r
a
c
k
s
o
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
d
e
m
a
n
d
s
i
t
,
t
o
make emergency repairs without notice to the Licensee
a
n
d
t
o
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
t
h
e
c
o
s
t
t
h
e
r
e
o
f
f
r
o
m
Licensee as herein provided.
FIFTH. Licensee agrees that in the construction, maintenance, and us
e
o
f
t
h
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
,
it will comply with all applicable laws, including, but
n
o
t
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
t
o
,
a
n
y
l
a
w
s
,
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
,
regulations, or permit requirements relating to environm
e
n
t
a
l
p
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
o
r
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
t
o
occupational health and safety; and Licensee agrees to
i
n
d
e
m
n
i
f
y
a
n
d
h
o
l
d
h
a
r
m
l
e
s
s
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
from any and all claims, demands, lawsuit, or liabilit
y
f
o
r
l
o
s
s
,
f
i
n
e
s
,
d
a
m
a
g
e
,
i
n
j
u
r
y
,
a
n
d
death and all expenses and costs, including attorneys' f
e
e
s
,
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
o
r
a
r
i
s
i
n
g
o
u
t
o
f
the construction, maintenance, or use of the facility,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
a
n
y
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
o
r
e
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
therefrom or for the violation of any law, standard, reg
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
,
o
r
p
e
r
m
i
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
r
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
to environmental pollution or contamination, or t
o
o
c
c
u
p
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
h
e
a
l
t
h
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
SIXTH. It is understood by the Licensee that said facil
i
t
y
i
s
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
a
n
d
m
a
y
ncrease the dangers and hazards of the operation of the railroad
o
f
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
,
a
n
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
i
s
license is subject to all risks thereof. Therefore, and as
a
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
Company for entering into this license and without which the
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
w
i
l
l
n
o
t
e
n
t
e
r
s
a
m
e
,
1"-.1-. Licensee agrees to assume and pay for all loss or damage
t
o
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
w
h
a
t
s
o
e
v
e
r
,
a
n
d
i
n
j
u
r
y
t
o
or death of any person, or persons whomsoever, includ
i
n
g
a
l
l
c
o
s
t
s
a
n
d
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
i
n
c
i
d
e
n
t
thereto, however arising from or in connection with e
x
i
s
t
e
n
c
e
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
,
repair, renewal, reconstruction, operation, use or rem
o
v
a
l
o
f
s
a
i
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
,
o
r
a
n
y
d
e
f
e
c
t
therein or failure thereof, or the failure of the Lice
n
s
e
e
o
r
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
r
s
,
a
g
e
n
t
s
o
r
employees of the Licensee to abide by or comply with an
y
o
f
t
h
e
t
e
r
m
s
o
r
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
i
s
license; and the Licensee forever indemnifies the Com
p
a
n
y
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
a
n
d
a
g
r
e
e
s
t
o
s
a
v
e
i
t
harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits or
l
i
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
f
o
r
a
n
y
s
u
c
h
l
o
s
s
,
d
a
m
a
g
e
,
injury and death, costs and expense, even though the ope
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
'
s
r
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
m
a
y
have caused or contributed thereto. Notice to or know
l
e
d
g
e
b
y
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
o
f
a
n
y
a
c
t
o
r
omission by the Licensee which is or might be a breach b
y
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
o
f
a
n
y
o
f
t
h
e
t
e
r
m
s
o
r
conditions of this Agreement to be performed by the Li
c
e
n
s
e
e
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
a
c
q
u
i
e
s
c
e
n
s
e
b
y
t
n
e
Company in or to such act or omission, shall neither be c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
t
o
r
e
l
i
e
v
e
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
o
f
any obligation assumed by it under this paragraph nor be
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
t
o
b
e
a
w
a
i
v
e
r
o
r
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
by the Company of any rignts granted to it under this parag
r
a
p
h
.
SEVENTH. The Company reserves the right to use, occupy
a
n
d
e
n
j
o
y
i
t
s
t
r
a
c
k
s
,
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
and right of way, for such purpose, in such manner, and at such time as i
t
s
h
a
l
l
d
e
s
i
r
e
,
t
h
e
same as if this Instrument had not been executed by it. I
f
a
n
y
s
u
c
h
u
s
e
s
h
a
l
l
n
e
c
e
s
s
i
t
a
t
e
a
n
y
change, repair, renewal, removal or relocation of said
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
,
o
r
a
n
y
p
a
r
t
t
h
e
r
e
o
f
,
t
h
e
Licensee shall perform such work at such time as the C
o
m
p
a
n
y
m
a
y
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
a
n
d
i
f
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
fails to do so such work may be performed by the Company a
t
t
h
e
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
said Company shall not be liable to the Licensee on ac
c
o
u
n
t
o
f
a
n
y
d
a
m
a
g
e
g
r
o
w
i
n
g
o
u
t
o
f
a
n
y
-e which the Company ' may make of its tracks
,
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
o
f
w
a
y
.
In case any of the terms or provisions of this license h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
o
r
c
a
r
r
i
e
d
o
u
t
prior to the actual date of execution hereof, it is u
n
d
e
r
s
t
o
o
d
a
n
d
a
g
r
e
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
i
s
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
shall nevertheless be of the same force and effect as
t
h
o
u
g
h
s
a
m
e
h
a
d
b
e
e
n
e
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
parties prior to such performance.
003
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-164
RESOLUTION ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND
PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
WHEREAS, it is proposed to make the following improvement
s
:
I.C. 52-147 (Watermain Extension to Cedar Ridge Elementar
y
S
c
h
o
o
l
)
and assess the benefitted property for all or a portio
n
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
s
t
o
f
t
h
e
improvements, pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Chapter 429.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
:
That the proposed improvements be referred to the City
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
f
o
r
s
t
u
d
y
with the assistance of HTPO, and that a feasibility re
p
o
r
t
t
o
g
e
t
h
e
r
w
i
t
h
plans and specifications shall be prepared and pre
s
e
n
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Council with all c)nvenient speed advising the Counci
l
i
n
a
p
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
way as to the scope, cost assessment and feasibilit
y
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
improvements.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 9,
1
9
8
8
.
Gary D. oeterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Hog
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-154
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A PUBLIC SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN
SERVICES COUNCIL AND AUTHORIZING ASSIGNMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES TO
HENNEPIN COUNTY (YEAR XIV CDBG FUNDS--H.O.M.E. PROGRAM)
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie is an authorized subgrantee participant in the
Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant program by virtue of a Joint
Cooperation Agreement executed between the City and Hennepin County pursuant to the
provisions of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1973, Title I of Public
Law 93-383, as amended; and,
WHEREAS, the City will utilize Block Grant funds to support the H.O.M.E. Program as
a public service activity in Program Year XIV; and,
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City to enter into a public service agreement with
the provider, South Hennepin Human Services Council; and,
WHEREAS, the public service agreement allows the City to assign administrative
responsibilities to another cooperating unit;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that the Mayor and
City Manager are authorized to execute an agreement with South Hennepin Human
Services Council to provide financial support to the H.O.M.E. Program.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City assigns its administrative responsibility for
this program to Hennepin County through its Office of Planning and Development.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 9, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, May
ATTEST;
John D. Frane, City Clerk
This agreement made and entered into by and between
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
o
f
Eden Prairie , hereinafter referred to as the "City" and South Henn
e
p
i
n
H
u
m
a
n
Services Council, a public service agency, hereinaft
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
t
o
a
s
t
h
e
"Agency", for the purpose of providing financial assis
t
a
n
c
e
t
o
H
.
O
.
M
.
E
.
(Household and Outside Maintenance for Elderly), he
r
e
i
n
a
f
t
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
t
o
a
s
the "Program".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City is an authorized subgrantee partic
i
p
a
n
t
i
n
t
h
e
U
r
b
a
n
Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
b
y
v
i
r
t
u
e
o
f
a
j
o
i
n
t
cooperation agreement executed between the City and He
n
n
e
p
i
n
C
o
u
n
t
y
p
u
r
s
u
a
n
t
to MSA 471.59, and
WHEREAS, the City has allocated Urban Hennepin County
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
-
ment Block Grant funds in program year XIV , project number 23026 , for the purpose of providing support to the Program administer
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
A
g
e
n
c
y
.
NOW 171-1EREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants an
d
p
r
o
m
i
s
e
s
contained in this Agreement, the parties hereto mutua
l
l
y
a
g
r
e
e
t
o
t
h
e
follow-ing terms and conditions:
The City agrees to provide $3,325.00 dollars in Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds to the Agen
c
y
i
n
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
P
r
o
-
gram.
The City reserves the right to assign administrativ
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
p
u
r
s
u
a
n
t
to the Community Development Block Grant Program to
a
n
y
o
t
h
e
r
C
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
Unit.
II
The Agency agrees to administer the Program in accor
d
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
requirements:
1. Household Mame for households receiving assist
a
n
c
e
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
P
r
o
-
gram shall not exceed 80 percent of the median househ
o
l
d
i
n
c
o
m
e
b
y
household size established by the Department of Housi
n
g
a
n
d
U
r
b
a
n
Development (HUT). Maxinnnn annual household income for federal Fiscal Year 1988 shall be:
one person - $22,700
two person - $25,900
These income figures Shall remain in effect until the
y
a
r
e
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
b
y
2. Prior to receiving assistance from the Program e
a
c
h
h
o
u
s
e
h
o
l
d
s
h
a
l
l
receive, complete and submit an application (Attachme
n
t
A). This application shall remain in effect for twelve (12) mo
n
t
h
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
date on the application. Verification of inccne will
n
o
t
b
e
required.
III
The Agency provides assurance that it will comply with
:
1. Title VT of the Civil Bights Act of 1964 (PL88-352) (
N
o
n
d
i
s
c
r
i
m
i
n
a
-
tion in programs or activities receiving federal fina
n
c
i
a
l
a
s
q
i
s
-
tance.)
2. Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development
Act of 1974 as amended. (Nondiscrimination in any program or acti
v
i
t
y
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
provision of the HCDA.)
3. 0Mh Circular A-102 Attadhment 0, Section 14, paragraph
(
h
)
b
y
a
s
s
u
r
-
ing the subgrantee, federal grantor agency, the Comptr
o
l
l
e
r
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
of the United States or any duly authorized represen
t
a
t
i
v
e
a
c
c
P
s
s
t
o
all records directly pertinent to this contract for
t
h
e
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
o
f
making audit examinations, excerpts and transcriptio
n
s
.
4. OMB Circular A-102 Attachment C (2), and maintain al
l
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
records for a period of three years after receiving
f
i
n
a
l
p
a
y
m
e
n
t
.
5. OMB Circular A-87 "Cost Principles for State and Loc
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
s
.
"
IV
The Agency, prior to financial reimbursement from th
e
C
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
t
h
e
City with:
1. CDBG Payment Bequest (H.O.M.E. form)
The Agency shall retain the following completed form
s
i
n
t
h
e
c
l
i
e
n
t
f
i
l
e
:
1. Client Application (annual)
2. Client Maintenance Service Plan
3. Homemaker Program Task Sheet
These forms are attached hereto and made a part of th
i
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
A
n
y
changes to thPsP forms must be mutually agreed to.
V
This Agreement is effective as of July 1, 1988, and S
h
a
l
l
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
i
n
f
u
l
l
force and effect until all funds made available under
t
h
i
s
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
expended, but no later than December 31, 1989.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto hav
e
s
e
t
t
h
e
i
r
h
a
n
d
s
a
n
d
a
f
f
i
x
e
d
their seals this
day of , 1988.
Upon proper execution,
this Agreement will be
legally valid and binding.
By
Chair, South Hennepin Human
Services Council
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
caw OF EDEN PRAIRIE
41,X
Mayor arxi
andX'
City Manager
Executive Director, South
Hennepin Human Services COuneil
HOMEAGZE.DOC
ir, . Bossardt
4 Christenson
Corporation
July 8, 1988
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Attention: Mr. Mike Franzen
RE: TIME EXTENSION FOR
DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT
PRAIRIE COURT SHOPPING CENTER
COUNTY ROAD 4 & MN HIGHWAY 5
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
Dear Sir:
We herein request an extension of the subject Developer's Agree-
ment and rezoning and platting approvals for the subject project
from August 5, 1988, to August 5, 1989. The project was approved
by the city council on August 5, 1986.
The reason we request this extension is because we have not yet
reached the preleasing required by our mortgage lenders. We are
now about 6000 SF short of our 16,000 SF goal.
Progress on the project, however, has been substantial. Design
work is complete, work has been bid, and we are now ready for
construction. At this point in time, we have invested substantial
amounts in site improvement, design work, traffic studies, market-
ing, brochures, appraisals and leasing fees. We feel confident,
however, that within one year construction of the project will be
well underway.
If you desire additional clarification on any item in this letter,
please call.
Ronald'A.'Chrii6tZ
BOSSARDT CHRISTENSON CORPORATION
RC/jw
aro Construction Management Seroces
:331Y ML;aarmus Tower • 33 53,,tri s.tr, street • lvfinneapolls. M n nnesota 55402 • (6121 333.7414
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-149
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted t
h
e
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and,
WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Cou
n
c
i
l
f
o
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
and comment; and,
WHEREAS, the proposal of Bruce Hubbard for development of
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
M
i
n
i
-
Storage for Industrial use requires the amendment of the Plan
;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
,
Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as fol
l
o
w
s
:
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
7
.
7
acres located northwest of Flying Cloud Drive, southeast
o
f
U
.
S
.
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
#
1
6
9
b
e
modified from Office to Industrial.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 9th day of A
u
g
u
s
t
,
1
9
8
8
.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #88-150
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF MINNESOTA MINI-STORAGE FOR
BRUCE HUBBARD
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Minnesota Mini-Storage for Bruce Hubbard, dated August
3, 1988, consisting of 7.7 acres into one lot, a copy of which is on file at the
City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie
Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 9th day of August, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
July 8, 1988
Minnesota Mini-Storage
Northwest of Flying Cloud Drive, southeast of U.S. Highway #169
Minnesota Mini-Storage
1. Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 on 2.35 acres.
2. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office to Industrial on
7.7 acres.
3. Preliminary Plat of 7.7 acres into one lot.
Background
This site is currently designated on
the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide
Plan for Office land uses. Adjacent
Guide Plan designations to the east
and south are also for Office. U.S.
Highway 0169 is located to the west
of the project site and Flying Cloud
Drive to the south. Adjacent zoning
classifications include C-Highway to
the east and southwest, 1-2 Park to
the north, and Flying Cloud Drive to 1 -2.5
the south.
The proponent is currently re-
questing a Zoning District Change
from Rural to . 1-2 Park on
approximately 2.25 acres to allow
for the construction of an ad-
ditional 37,784 square feet of mini-
storage.
Comprehensive Guide Plan
Although not originally requested, a
Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from
AREA LOCATION MAP
Minnesota Mini-Storage
2 July 8, 1988
Office to Industrial is required to allow for the new construction and to make the
existing mini-storage project conform to the Comprehensive Guide Plan. In 1974, the
Comprehensive Guide Plan designation for this area was C-3, which was a Commercial
Guide Plan designation. In the Staff Report, dated May 6, 1974, it was stated that
granting the rezoning from Highway/Commercial and Rural to 1-2 Park would constitute
an amendment to the 1968 Guide Plan, changing the use from Regional Service to
Industrial. Although identified, no formal Guide Plan Change was processed for
Phase I in 1974, or Phase Il in 1978. Because a Comprehensive Guide Plan Change is
a public hea .ing before the Planning Commission, this item should be continued until
the next meeting to allow time for proper legal notification.
Site Plan/Preliminary Plat
The preliminary plat involves the combination of 5 existing lots into 1 lot
totalling 335,266 square feet, or 7.7 acres. Phases I and II of the existing
project are located on lots containing 5.3 acres and are currently zoned 1-2 Park.
The proposed addition to the mini-storage would consist of 8 buildings which
includes 7 mini-storage, totalling 35,554 square feet and a new 2-unit manager's
apartment/office containing 2,230 square feet. Typically, only one apartment unit
has been provided on-site for the manager of the project. Because of the size of
this project, and the supportive nature of the residential use, the proposal for two
apartment units is acceptable in this particular case. Staff would not recommend
any additional units. Overall, a Base Area Ratio of 30% and a Floor Area Ratio of
32.9% has been calculated which is allowed within the 1-2 Park Zoning District.
Total building square footage for the entire project would be 110,170 square feet.
All of the buildings meet the minimum requirments of the zoning district.
Access to this site would be provided from Flying Cloud Drive by a new 27-foot
driveway located within the center portion of the project. The existing driveway
will be removed. One access is proposed for security reasons. A total of nine
outdoor parking stalls and a 2-stall garage have been provided to meet code
requirements.
Grading
Because the majority of this property is developed, grading will occur only on Phase
III. Elevations on this portion of the site range from a high point of
approximately 920 adjacent the north property line to a low point of 896 located
within the center portion of the site. The site slopes from both directions toward
the center of the project. Maximum cut and fill includes 14 feet of cut where
Building 1 is located and approximately 6 feet of fill where Building 5 is located.
Because of the amount of cut in the northern portion of the site, two retaining
walls are required. These retaining walls range to a maximum of approximately 5
feet in height. Any retaining wall over 4 feet in height would require detailed
building plans and a building permit.
Utilities
Utilities are available to the new office/manager's apartment through existing
services. A 6-inch water line will be extended from the 12-inch water line located
within Flying Cloud Drive to sprinkle Building 5 which is required.
Because of the amount of impervious surface, a series of catch basins have been
located through the project site. Additional catch basins may be required based
Minnesota Mini-Storage 3 July 8, 1988
upon storm water run-off calculations which are required to be submitted to the
Engineering Department.
Landscapins
Based upon an overall building square footage of 110,945 square feet, a total of 347
caliper inches of plant material is required. The proposed landscape plan depicts a
total of 536 caliper inches on-site, of which 436 caliper inches are currently
existing.
Because the level of screening of the existing project from U.S. Highway 0169 is
inadequate, Staff recommends that additional 6 and 8-foot evergreen trees be planted
along U.S. Highway 0169 (see Attachment A). Although the plant material will not
completely screen the overhead garage doors initially, the level of screening will
continue to increase over time. In addition, the fence along the northern portion
of the property adjacent U.S. Highway 0169 has fallen into disrepair. The existing
fence shall be replaced as part of the development of this project.
Architecture
The buildings proposed are similar in style to the existing buildings on the site.
The primary building material is decorative concrete block which is allowed within
the 1-2 Park Zoning District. The buildings are approximately 131/2 feet in height
with overhead garage doors on both sides. The proponent shall submit exterior
building material samples and colors for review prior to City Council. The
proponent has indicated that the existing buildings will be repainted to match the
new buildings.
Signagenightinq
No additional signage is required for this project. The existing sign shall be
relocated to the new entrance driveway. Site lighting is proposed to be 80-watt
downcast wallpacks designed to not emit any off-site glare. Additional overhead
lighting is proposed at the entrance of the project for security reasons.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff would recommend the continuance of this project until the July
25, 1988, Planning Commission meeting for review of the Comprehensive Guide Plan
Change request. However, Staff is recommending approval of the Zoning District
Change from Rural to 1-2 Park on approximately 2.35 acres and the Preliminary Plat
of 7.7 acres based upon plans dated June 24, 1988, and subject to the Staff Report,
dated July 8, 1988, and subject to the following conditions:
1. The public hearing and adoption of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from
Office to Industrial by Planning Commission.
2. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Revise the landscape plan to include additional 6 and 8-foot
evergreen trees along U.S. Highway 0169 for screening purposes. In
addition, the fence located along the northern portion of the site
shall be replaced.
B. Provide exterior building material samples and colors for review.
t•'4
Minnesota Mini-Storage
4 July 8, 1988
3. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
B. Provide detailed storm water run-off, erosion control plans, and
utility plans for review by the City Engineer.
4. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading.
B. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
C. Provide plans for review by the Fire Marshal.
D. Any retaining wall over 4 feet in height requires a building permit.
VA
4:
010
j NEW EVE
ATTACHMENT A aum.360.6...... nib
Eden Prairie Planning Commission Meeting
July 11, 1988 Page 5
1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 8, 1988, and other concerns such as good transition, drainage, pollution, road alignment an
d
p
a
r
k
i
s
s
u
e
s
.
Motion carried 5-0-0
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to recomm
e
n
d
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
approval of the request of JMS Equities, Inc., for Zoning District Change fr
o
m
R
u
r
a
l
t
o
R
1
-
1
3
.
5
o
n
6
.
6
a
c
r
e
s
f
o
r
Eden Creek, for single family residential development, based
o
n
p
l
a
n
s
d
a
t
e
d
J
u
n
e
2
4
,
1
9
8
8
,
subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated Jul
y
8
,
1
9
8
8
,
a
n
d
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
s
m
e
n
t
i
o
n
e
d
i
n
Motion 2.
Motion carried 5-0-0
MOTION 4:
Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to recomm
e
n
d
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
approval of the request of JMS Equities. Inc., for Preliminary Plat of 6.6 acr
e
s
f
o
r
E
d
e
n
C
r
e
e
k
f
o
r
t
e
n
s
i
n
g
l
e
family lots, one outlot, and road right-of-way, based on plans d
a
t
e
d
J
u
n
e
2
4
,
1
9
8
8
,
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
t
h
e
recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 8, 1988, and
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
s
m
e
n
t
i
o
n
e
d
i
n
M
o
t
i
o
n
2
.
C. MINNESOTA MINI -STORAGE by Bruce Hubbard. Request for Zoning District Change
from Rural to 1-2 for 2.35 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 7.7 acre
s
i
n
t
o
o
n
e
l
o
t
f
o
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
44,255 square feet of storage buildings. Location: Northwest
o
f
F
l
y
i
n
g
C
l
o
u
d
D
r
i
v
e
,
s
o
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
of U.S.Highway #169. A public hearing.
Bruce Hubbard, proponent, presented the project which was a
c
o
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
f
i
v
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
l
o
t
s
i
n
t
o
1 lot equalling 335,255 square feet or 7.7 acres, He stated that
t
h
e
d
e
m
a
n
d
w
a
s
s
u
c
h
t
h
a
t
expansion was necessary. A new updated look for the develop
m
e
n
t
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
t
h
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
2
-
Unit manager's apartment/office containing 2,230 square feet,
a
n
d
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
.
A
c
c
e
s
s
to the site would be from Flying Cloud Drive via a new 27 foot dri
v
e
w
a
y
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
o
f
the project, and the existing driveway would be removed.
Fell inquired if the storage units were unheated. Proponent re
s
p
o
n
d
e
d
y
e
s
,
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
e
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
Building #5, all buildings were unheated.
Fell asked how deep the footings were and proponent stated 3-
1
/
2
t
o
4
f
e
e
t
a
n
d
w
e
r
e
s
o
i
l
cushioned instead of floating slabs.
Uram stated that Staff was recommending approval based on th
e
i
r
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
H
e
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
that after this item was scheduled for public hearing, a Compreh
e
n
s
i
v
e
G
u
i
d
e
P
l
a
n
C
h
a
n
g
e
f
r
o
m
Office to Industrial was identified by Staff Because the required
c
h
a
n
g
e
w
a
s
n
o
t
i
c
e
d
s
o
l
a
k
e
i
n
t
h
e
process, the public hearing could not legally be held at this me
e
t
i
n
g
.
A
f
t
e
r
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
b
y
S
t
a
f
f
,
h
e
was determined that this item must be continued until the July
2
5
,
1
9
8
8
,
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
meeting. The proponent was agreeable to this but requested to
p
r
o
c
e
e
d
t
o
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
a
s
s
o
o
n
a
s
possible. Staff recommends that the Commission order the publ
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
i
s
i
t
e
m
f
o
r
t
h
e
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
,
1988 City Council meeting.
MOTION:
Motion was made by Fell and seconded by Ruebling to
continue the public hearing for Minnesota Mini-Storage to the July 25, 1988, Planning Commission mee
t
i
n
g
.
I
t
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
t
o
o
r
d
e
r
the scheduling of this project for August 2, 1988, City Council
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
a
t
t
h
i
s
t
i
m
e
.
Motion carried 5-0-0
. 7 '
Eden Prairie Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
July 25, I988 Page 2
Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 on 92.7 acres and from Rural to R1-13.5 on 53.6
acres, Preliminary Play of 148,2 acres into 367 single family lots, 28 outlots and road ri
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
,
review of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet for construction of a residential
development. Location: West of County Road 4, southeast of the Minneapolis and S
t
.
L
o
u
i
s
Railroad. A continued public hearing.
Franzen reported that Phases 2 through 6 of the project were continued from the Jun
e
2
7
1
h
,
1
9
8
8
meeting pending receipt of the completed Southwest Area Study. He reported that t
h
e
s
t
u
d
y
would be completed in the next couple of weeks.
MOTION:
Motion was made by Ruebling and seconded by Fell to continue Fairfield, Phases 2-6 to the August 22, 1988, Planning Commission meeting, pending review and approval of the
S
o
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
Area Study, directing Staff to republish and renotice the item in the paper and to the s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
neighborhood.
Motion carried 5-0-0
B. DATASERV by Opus Corporation. Request for PUD Amendment Review on 17.4 acres,
Planned Unit Development District Review on 17.4 acres with a waiver for office use up t
o
1
0
0
%
within the l-2 Zoning District, Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 on 7.4 acres and P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
Plat 01 17.4 acres into I lot for construction of additional parking spaces for the Dataserv
Headquarters. Location: South of Technology Drive, east of Prairie Center Drive. A con
t
i
n
u
e
d
public hearing.
Franzen reported that this item has been continued from two previous Planning Commis
s
i
o
n
meetings pending receipt of the traffic study on the property. He stated the traffic study
w
a
s
received last week and indicated 406 trips would be generated at the site. Staff plans to
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
w
i
t
h
developer and owner a traffic management plan which would include ride share, and diff
e
r
e
n
t
groups leaving work at different times. Development of such management could reduc
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
b
y
80 trips per day.
Ruebling inquired if a traffic management plan was developed with Dataserv and the
n
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
was used by another company, would they conformed to the traffic management res
t
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
.
Franzen replied that any new use of the building must meet the 1985 BRW Traffic all
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
I
f
t
r
i
p
s
generated by a new use would exceed this, a traffic management plan may be necess
a
r
y
.
MOTION•
Motion was made by Ruebling and seconded by Fell to continue Dataserv to the August 8, 1988, Planning Commission meeting, pending Staff review of the traffic study on the propo
s
e
d
development.
D. MINNESOTA MINI.STORAGE, by Bruce Hubbard. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment from Office to Industrial on 7.7 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to
1
-
2
f
o
r
2.35 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 7.7 acres into one lot for construction 01 44,255 sq
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
o
f
storage buildings. Location: Northwest of Flying Cloud Drive, southeast of U.S.Highw
a
y
#
1
6
9
.
A public hearing.
Uram reported that the item was continued form the July 11, 1988, Planning Commissi
o
n
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
,
pending notification of the required Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment for the pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
f
r
o
m
office to industrial. He continued that the preliminary plat involved the combination of
5
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
l
o
t
s
into 1101 totaling 335,266 sq.ft. or 7.7 acres. The proposed addition would consist of
8
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
which includes 7 mini-storage, and a new 2-unit manager's apartment/office. Access to
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
Eden Prairie Planning Commisttittn Meeting Minutes
July 25, 1988 Page 3
would be from Flying Cloud Drive by a 27 foot driveway located in
t
h
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
One access was proposed for security reasons, and a total of nine outdoor parking stalls and a 2-st
a
l
l
garage will be provided to meet code requirements.
Hubbard stated he was available for questions from the Commissio
n
.
No public comments.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to close the public hearing.
Motion carried 5-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to recommend t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
approval of the request of Bruce Hubbard for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amen
d
m
e
n
t
f
r
o
m
O
f
f
i
c
e
t
o
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
on 7.7 acres for the expansion of Minnesota Mini-Storage, based
o
n
p
l
a
n
s
d
a
t
e
d
J
u
n
e
2
4
,
1
9
8
8
,
subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 8, 1
9
8
8
.
Motion carried 5-0-0
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to recommen
d
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
approval of the request of Bruce Hubbard for Zoning District Change from Ru
r
a
l
t
o
1
-
2
o
n
2
.
3
5
a
c
r
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
expansion of Minnesota Mini-Storage, based on plans dated Jun
e
2
4
,
1
9
8
8
,
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
t
h
e
recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 8, 1988.
Motion carried 5-0-0
MOTION 4:
Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to recommen
d
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
approval of the request of Bruce Hubbard for Preliminary Plat of 7.7 acres int
o
o
n
e
l
o
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
e
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
Minnesota Mini-Storage, based on plans dated June 24, 1988.
Motion carried 5-0-0
D. RED ROCK RANCH by Robert H. Mason Homes, Inc. Request for Comprehensive
G
u
i
d
e
Plan Change from Medium Density Residential to Low Density R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
o
n
9
.
2
a
c
r
e
s
,
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
Unit Development Concept Amendment on approximately 150 a
c
r
e
s
,
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
U
n
i
t
Development District Review on approximately 52 acres with waiv
e
r
s
a
n
d
Z
o
n
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
C
h
a
g
n
e
from Rural to RI -13.5 on approximately 52 acres with Shoreland v
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
s
t
o
b
e
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
Board of Appeals, Preliminary Platting 01150 acres into 62 single f
a
m
i
l
y
l
o
t
s
,
5
o
u
t
l
o
t
s
a
n
d
r
o
a
d
right-of-way. Location: West of Mitchell Road, east of Red Rock
L
a
k
e
.
A
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
hearing.
Franzen summarized the issues in the Staff Report relative to tree l
o
s
s
,
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
a
n
d
r
o
a
d
s
.
F
r
a
n
z
e
n
addressed the tree loss issue and indicated that developer estimat
e
d
a
1
8
%
l
o
s
s
w
h
i
l
e
t
h
e
S
t
a
f
f
estimates 44%. Staff recommended that developer bond and repl
a
c
e
t
h
o
s
e
t
r
e
e
s
l
o
s
t
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
house pads and due to road construction, which would be the 18
%
;
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
w
o
u
l
d
b
o
n
d
f
o
r
the additional trees expected to be lost due to the construction pra
c
t
i
c
e
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
l
i
m
i
t
s
,
which would be a potential 26%. He continued that after the home
s
a
r
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
,
i
t
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
determined by the City Forester what trees would survive, then cre
d
i
t
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
g
i
v
e
n
a
n
d
t
h
e
b
o
n
d
amount reduced; or if determined the trees would not survive, then
t
h
e
y
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
d
.
Regarding density, there should be a transition between the multipl
e
a
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
s
i
n
g
l
e
f
a
m
i
l
y
h
o
m
e
s
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-151
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopt
e
d
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and,
WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
f
o
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
and comment; and,
WHEREAS, the proposal of JMS Equities, Inc., for develo
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
E
d
e
n
C
r
e
e
k
for Low Density Residential use requires the amendment of
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Counci
l
o
f
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
,
Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as
f
o
l
l
o
w
s
:
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1
.
9
acres located southeast of County Road #4, across from M
e
r
e
D
r
i
v
e
,
b
e
m
o
d
i
f
i
e
d
f
r
o
m
Open Space to Low Density Residential.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 9th d
a
y
o
f
A
u
g
u
s
t
,
1
9
8
8
.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, City Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #88-152
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EDEN CREEK FOR
JMS EQUITIES, INC.
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Eden Creek for JMS Equities, Inc., dated August 3,
1988, consisting of 6.6 acres into 10 single family lots, one outlot, and road
right-of-way, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in
conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances,
and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 1st day of October, 1985.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, City Clerk
July 11, 1988
To: City Hall Planning Department
From: Gail and David Beno, 6618 Rainbow Drive, Ed
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
This letter is in regards to the proposed develop
m
e
n
t
t
o
b
e
known as Eden Creek on Tract A RLS #116, Hennepin
C
O
u
n
t
y
.
These are my concerns:
My lot is adjacent to four lots that will measure
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1/3 of an acre, our lot and several others on Rai
n
b
o
w
D
r
i
v
e
a
r
e
1/2 acrce lots. I think that the four lots on th
e
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
the road should be at least 1/2 acre tokeep our p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
v
a
l
u
e
strong and the density in the Paradise Valley are
a
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
.
There are many 1)'-24" diameter trees going to be removed. This
seems like an ecological shame. Perhaps better pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
c
a
n
eliminate some of this. It has been stated to me
t
h
a
t
l
a
r
g
e
trees that were removed from the Terracewood Devel
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
e
r
e
never replaced and that the City of Eden Prairie d
o
e
s
n
o
t
c
k
e
c
k
this once the homes are built. This upsets me sin
c
e
a
m
a
j
o
r
reason we moved to this area of Eden Praire was fo
r
t
h
e
p
r
a
i
r
i
e
and the forest which are now being literally stack
e
d
w
i
t
h
h
o
m
e
with 25-30 feet between them.
The proposed yards supposedly have sloped yards.
D
o
e
s
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
have an ordinance for lots of wetlands to ban ch
e
m
i
c
a
l
l
a
w
n
t
r
e
a
t
-
ments so as not to upset the ecosystem and the w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
o
f
t
h
e
creekland area. If we do not then I feel one sho
u
l
d
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
and acted upon real soon.
This is a major wildlife area along Purgatory Cre
e
k
.
T
h
e
r
e
a
r
e
a
n
abundance of homes being built upon it without mu
c
h
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
f
o
r
the natural habitats these are destroying. We sho
u
l
d
a
s
a
c
i
t
y
o
f
very educated, affluent and concerned citizens ke
e
p
t
h
e
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
o
n
these areas as low as we can. In doin9this we se
t
e
x
a
m
p
l
e
s
f
o
r
our young people and make statements that our env
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
ecology of where we live is important, more impor
t
a
n
t
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
few extra thousanl a year we as a city can make on taxes.
I urge the city council to drive by and take a lo
o
k
a
t
o
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
last really beautiful areas of Eden Prairie and u
r
g
e
t
h
e
m
t
o
think about some policy for future and existing de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
l
a
n
s
.
This area could be a wonderful natural outdoor ar
e
a
t
o
b
e
c
o
m
b
i
n
e
d
with the rest of the Eden Prairie Parks sytem,
Siac rely,
caez-o-u6
Gail and David Beno
July 14, 1986
To: City of Eden Prairie Planning Council and the City Council
From : Gail Beno
I am enclosing the letter I previously wrote and did not have a
chance to give to you after the meeting on July 11. I am writing
this current one to express further concerns and to let you know
that some of my questions were answered at the July 11, meeting.
My husband David and I have two major concerns with the Eden Creek
development that we would like the City Council to be sensitive
to. The first is in regards to the zoning of lots j-4 especially.
We feel strongly that this is much to high a density for that
parcel of land. One merely has to drive by that area and see
that four homes stacked in fron -of the Olson home would be
an eyesore since they would be so close, and lot #1 would almost
practically be on Eden Prairie Rd. This poses a great concern
for possible expansion of that road in further years, and also
a marketability factor for that home. If you have noticed three
homes in the adjacent Hidden Ridge development, that are new but
within 100 feet of Eden PRairie Road have not sold. Traffic is
increasing dramatically on this road, which bring me to our
second major concern.
The way .-:Eden Creek development is planned at this time clearly
shows traffic problems for Eden Prairie Road. As you descend the
big hill from the Duck Lake Trail intersection you will have to
contend with turning traffic every 50-100 feet approximately.
I urge all council members to drive by and imagine how this would
be. It is hazardous to bikers, children, and motorists. Much more
creative planning needs to be utilized here is connecting it with
Mere Drive. I have personally seen the glassy remains of several
accidents already at the Mere Drive intersection.
Our lot on 6618 Rainbow Drive is zoned 822. We feel strongly that
the council need to be sensitive to our zoning and back up any
immediate adjacent lots with other R22 lots. We also do not want
to see the backs of big homes with steep pitched roofs in the
winter and request that any lots up there have the home moved as
close to the front of their lot to insure our privacy and wooded
area, a major reason we bough:. in this area.
In regards to the 1.5 acre the developer plans to deed the city.
This is a grassy sometimes marshy area. Not really usuable by many
since the mosquitos will attack you in the summer. We don't see it
as a real gift , since it is also floodplain. If the acres and a
half was deeded parkland, the only acces would be through private
property. This needs to have some thought.
Thankyou for listening to my concerns.
„7-4.41247/
/9.e.hy..4'44./e.; 6021../7?1
C, ,y Mr74--
":1;4/e/ir, /)7/t1 5 -3 3 9'5'
11/•fL=7. • C ,/./2-;31e/4/6
c24/2_4•4/ /-71,24.6" 4 /71( 775:4
4%46'
L .,./a/fe :
d -3.00 Z-eC/L_.A7 d,a1:0,4
Z42-deA c
(92-;
7q, az)
Ze•77'
cc_/_f ' e,er_Ae47:2
,7
.576<iiej
,
„. yeA-47 ree-Ze-ee"
,et12.er,
`--/Zerr„--ej i /64C V ceaax
77/
AREA LOCATION MAP
na.),
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
July 8, 1988
Eden Creek Addition
Southeast of County Road #4, across from Mer
e
D
r
i
v
e
JMS Equities, Inc.
Ray Stodola and Dick Olson
1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Publ
i
c
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
t
o
Low Density Residential on 1.9 acres.
2. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5
o
n
6
.
6
a
c
r
e
s
.
3. Preliminary Plat of 6.6 acres into 10 sing
l
e
f
a
m
i
l
y
l
o
t
s
,
one outlot, and road right-of-way.
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
FEE OWNERS:
REQUEST:
Background
This site is currently designated on
the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide
Plan for Low Density Residential and
Public Open Space land uses.
Surrounding designations include
County Road #4 and Low Density
Residential to the north; Purgatory
Creek and Public Open Space to the
south; Low Density Residential to
the east; and, Public Open Space and
Low Density Residential to the west.
Specific land uses include Timber
Creek Woods, zoned R1-13.5 to the
northwest; Purgatory Creek and
Paradise Valley, zoned R1-22 to the
south and east; and, Hidden Ridge,
zoned RI-13.5 to the west.
Comprehensive Guide Plan Change
The 1982 Comprehensive Guide Plan
depicts the western portion of this
site as guided for Public Open
Eden Creek 2 July 8, 1988
Space. This designation is centered along the lot line betwe
e
n
t
h
e
S
t
o
d
o
l
a
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
and the Hidden Ridge Subdivision. The Hidden Ridge Subdi
v
i
s
i
o
n
w
a
s
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
i
n
1983. In reviewing the plans, there is no apparent reaso
n
w
h
y
t
h
i
s
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
exists. Therefore, Staff supports the request for a ch
a
n
g
e
o
f
t
h
e
G
u
i
d
e
P
l
a
n
designation on that portion of the property where develo
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
.
T
h
e
Public Open Space designation on Outlot A should remain.
Site Plan
The site plan depicts the division of a 6.6-acre tract
into 10 single family lots, and one outlot. The proposed zoning classification for this
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
R
1
-
1
3
.
5
a
n
d
all lots meet the minimum requirements of this zoning distr
i
c
t
.
L
o
t
s
i
z
e
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
the subdivision range from a minimum of 15,100 square feet
t
o
a
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
o
f
5
0
,
5
0
0
square feet. Average lot size, with the exception of Lot 10,
i
s
1
8
,
2
1
7
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
.
Existing homes which will remain are located on Lots 5 and
1
0
.
O
u
t
l
o
t
A
,
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
the southern property line is the location of Purgatory Cre
e
k
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
intends on dedicating to the City. Access to the project
w
i
l
l
b
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
County Road #4 by a single cul-de-sac. Please refer to
t
h
e
a
t
t
a
c
h
e
d
l
e
t
t
e
r
f
r
o
m
Hennepin County regarding specific road improvements.
Shoreland Ordinance/Purgatory Creek Corridor Study
Due to the location adjacent Purgatory Creek, both the Sh
o
r
e
l
a
n
d
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
Purgatory Creek Corridor study apply. The Ordinary High
W
a
t
e
r
M
a
r
k
,
o
r
1
0
0
-
y
e
a
r
flood elevation in this location is at the 854.6 contour
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
.
T
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
is dedicating Outlot A which is the majority of the floodp
l
a
i
n
.
T
h
a
t
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
floodplain not dedicated within Lots 6 and 7 will be p
l
a
c
e
d
i
n
a
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
a
n
d
utility easement. No land alteration is proposed to oc
c
u
r
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
1
0
0
-
y
e
a
r
floodplain elevation.
According to the Shoreland Ordinance, Lots 5, 6, and 7,
a
r
e
d
e
f
i
n
e
d
a
s
a
b
u
t
t
i
n
g
lots. Minimum requirements for lots abutting a General
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
W
a
t
e
r
w
i
t
h
public sanitary sewer and water include the following:
1. Minimum lot size - 13,500 square feet.
2. Minimum width at building line - 120 feet.
3. Minimum width at Ordinary High Water Mark - 120 feet.
4. Minimum setback at Ordinary High Water Mark - 100 feet.
The subdivision, as proposed, meets the minimum require
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
s
h
o
r
e
l
a
n
d
ordinance.
As previously stated, because of the location of Purgatory
C
r
e
e
k
,
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
o
t
s
5, 6, 7, and 8, are within the Purgatory Creek Conservancy A
r
e
a
.
W
i
t
h
t
h
e
d
e
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
of Outlot A, the significant site features along Purgatory Cr
e
e
k
a
r
e
b
e
i
n
g
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
which meets the intent of the Purgatory Creek Corridor Study.
Grading
Elevations on this site range from high points of 888 alon
g
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
e
r
n
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
line and 894 in the extreme northwest corner of the site,
t
o
a
l
o
w
p
o
i
n
t
o
f
8
4
6
Eden Creek 3 July 8, 1988
which would be within the Purgatory Creek floodplain. The site slopes in a
southerly direction towards Purgatory Creek. Maximum cut and fill includes an 8-
foot cut along the rear of Lot 4 and a fill amount of approximately 16 feet in the
northeast corner of the site. Preliminary cut and fill calculations have indicated
that a total of approximately 13,000 cubic yards of fill material will have to be
imported to develop the site as proposed.
The proponent has submitted a tree inventory which indicates a total of 792 caliper
inches of significant trees on site. With the development, a total of 210 caliper
inches of plant material would be removed, or 26.5%. A tree replacement plan
depicting 148 caliper inches of plant material shall be submitted prior to Council
review.
Utilities
Water and sanitary sewer is available to this site through connections made to an
existing 12-inch water and 8-inch sanitary sewer along the south side of County Road
#4. A 6-inch water and 8-inch sanitary sewer shall be extended within the roadway
to service the existing and proposed homes.
Storm water run-off from the subdivision is proposed to be collected within a catch
basin system located within the cul-de-sac bubble and discharged into the Purgatory
Creek floodplain. The plan also indicates a storm sewer pipe located along County
Road #4 which is designed to capture storm water run-off from County Road #4, with a
connection made to the existing 24-inch storm sewer pipe, which extends and
discharges to the north under County Road #4. For a more detailed report regarding
the proposed drainage plans, please refer to the attached memo from the City
Engineer.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of the request for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from
Public Open Space to Low Density Residential on 1.9 acres, Zoning District Change
from Rural to R1-13.5 on 6.6 acres, Preliminary Plat of 6.6 acres into 10 single
family lots, one outlot, and road right-of-way, based upon plans dated June 24,
1988, and July 1, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report, dated
July 8, 1988, and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Submit a tree replacement plan which depicts a total of 148 caliper
inches on-site.
B. Revise the plans to reflect the reconstruction of the existing by-
pass lane on CSAH 4 to approximately the dimensions shown on
Attachment 1.
2. Prior to Final Plat, proponent shall:
A. Submit storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by
the Watershed District.
B. Submit storm water run-off, utility, and erosion control plans for
review by the City Engineer.
raLi
Eden Creek 4 July 8, 1988
3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
B. Submit plans for review by the Building Departme
n
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
of the existing septic systems and well systems.
4 The sheds located along the western property
l
i
n
e
o
f
L
o
t
1
0
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
relocated to meet City Code.
n25
Sincerely, -
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
320 Washington Av. South
HENNEPIN
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468
935-3381
July 6, 1988
Mr. Chris Enger
Planning Director
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Mr. Enger:
RE: Proposed Plat - Eden Creek
CSAH 4, Opposite Mere Drive
Section 4/5, Township 116, Range 22
Hennepin County Plat No. 1651
Review and Recommendations
Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, requ
i
r
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
r
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above
p
l
a
t
a
n
d
m
a
k
e
t
h
e
following comments:
- No additional right of way required by Hennepin County alon
g
t
h
i
s
s
e
g
m
e
n
t
o
f
CSAH 4 at this time.
- Ideally, the proposed Nancy Drive should be placed directly
o
p
p
o
s
i
t
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
Mere Drive, however if this is not feasible, the developer
m
u
s
t
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
t
h
e
existing by-pass lane to approximately the dimensions shown
o
n
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
.
- Any new access to a county road requires an approved Hennep
i
n
C
o
u
n
t
y
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
permit before beginning any construction. Contact our Maint
e
n
a
n
c
e
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
f
o
r
entrance permit forms.
- All proposed construction within County right of way require
s
a
n
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
utility permit prior to beginning construction. This inclu
d
e
s
,
b
u
t
i
s
n
o
t
limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail develop
m
e
n
t
,
a
n
d
landscaping. Contact our Maintenance Division for utility pe
r
m
i
t
f
o
r
m
s
.
- The developer must restore all areas disturbed during constru
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
i
n
C
o
u
n
t
y
right of way.
Please direct any response or questions to Les Weigelt.
David W. Schmidt, P.E.
Transportation Planning
CMS/LOW:1w
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an equal opportunIty employer
COMBINED RIGHT TURN a BY-PASS LANE ( RECOMMENDED DIMENSIONS) 30' R 300' rApeR 64,9) Gee. k A rrAcgitieAo- -1 HENN. CO. TRAFFIC DIVISION JA NUAR Y 1979
MEMO
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
Alan Gray, P.E., City Engineer
DATE:
July 8, 1988
RE:
EDEN CREEK
The purpose of this memo is to discuss the Engineering Department's review of
the storm drainage systems proposed for the residential subdivision known as
Eden Creek. The material submitted for review include the development plan
showing proposed house pad elevations and the proposed storm drainage
facilities together with the grading and erosion control plan. Also submitted
are xerox copies of two pages of hand calculations relative to storm sewer
design.
Our review indicates that the concept for storm drainage appears acceptable
but the preliminary sizes for storm drainage conduits may be inadequate. A
review of the calculations submitted indicates that the designer may have
underestimated the area which drains north along CSAH #4 in the ditch on the
east side. As much as five acres of existing residential area may drain north
in this ditch to the proposed intersection of Nancy Drive with CSAH #4. This
may require an increase in the size of the proposed storm sewer shown parallel
to CSAH #4 and connecting to the existing 24-inch RCP which drains across CSAH
#4 to the west.
With regard to this proposed residential subdivision, the Engineering
Department has the following recommendations:
1. The designer should make a precise determination of the drainage area
contributing to the ditch along the east side of CSAH #4. The
hydraulic calculations and preliminary sizing of proposed storm sewer
conduits should be revised to reflect the actual drainage area.
2. An overflow swale must be provided between proposed Lots 6 and 7 from
the end of the cul-de-sac on Nancy Drive, easterly to Purgatory Creek.
It may be desirable to raise the proposed first-floor elevations for
the homes to be constructed on Lots 6 and 7, to insure the proper
function of an overflow swale.
3. Driveways for the existing homes on proposed Lots 5 and 10, which now
connect directly to CSAH #4 should be eliminated and new driveway
connections constructed to proposed Nancy Drive.
Eden Prairie Planning Commission Meeting
July II, 1958 Page 2
B. plannina Commission Meeting Minutes of April 25. 1988.
MOTION:
Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Hallett to approve the minutes of the April 11, 1988. Planning Commission meeting as published.
Motion carried 3-0-1, Bye abstained.
C. PWnning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 13, 1988.
MOTION:
Motion was made by Ruebling and seconded by Bye to approve the minutes of the April 11, 1988,
Planning Commission meeting as published.
Motion carried 2-0-2, Hallett and Dodge abstained.
IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
A. DATASERV by Opus Corporation. Request for PUD Amendment Review on 17.4 acres,
Planned Unit Development District Review on 17.4 acres with a waiver for office use up to 1
0
0
%
within the 1-2 Zoning District, Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 on 7.4 acres and
Preliminary Plat of 17.4 acres into 1 lot for construction of additional parking spaces for the
Dataserv Headquarters. Location: South of Technology Drive, east of Prairie Center Drive.
A
continued public hearing.
Fransen reported that at the last meeting with BRW the data for driveway entrances and tur
n
l
a
n
e
s
had not been assembled for the Southwest Area Study, thus delaying the final results of t
h
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
study for the Dataseiv project. Staff was also planning a meeting with Dataserv for traffic
management discussion to reduce traffic flow numbers. Staff recommended that this item
b
e
continued for two weeks.
MOTION:
Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to continue this item to the July 25, 1988,
Planning Commission meeting pending receipt and analysis of the traffic information for t
h
e
proposed development.
Motion carried 5-0-0
B. EDEN CREEK by JMS Equities, !nc. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from
Public Open Space to Low Density Residential on 1.9 acres, Zoning District Change from
R
u
r
a
l
to R1-13.5 on 6.6 acres, Preliminary Plat of 6.6 acres into 10 single family lots, one outlot, a
n
d
road right-of-way. Location: Southeast of County Road #4, across from Mere Drive. A publ
i
c
hearing.
Jeff Schoenwetter, proponent, presented the project of 6.6 acres to be developed into
1
0
s
i
n
g
l
e
family lots, and one outlot. The average lot size would be 18,217 square feet. Outlot A, l
o
c
a
t
e
d
along Purgatory Creek, would be dedicated to the City. Access to the project would be p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
from County Road #4 by a single cul-de-sac.
Uram stated that two issues needed to be addressed. 1) The 1982 Comprehensive Guid
e
P
l
a
n
depicted the western portion of the site as guided for Public Open Space. This was cent
e
r
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
Eden Prairie Planning Commission Meeting July IL 1988 Page 3
the lot line between the Stodola properly and Hidden Ridge Subdivision. In reviewing the plans.
Staff could find no apparent reason why the designation existed. Staff was therefore supporting
the change to the Guide Plan designation on that portion of the property where this development
would be proposed. 2) Acccess to the project from County Road #4. This access point has been
reviewed and approved by Hennepin County. Uram reviewed the Staff Recommendations and City
Engineers recommendations.
Dr. Peter J. DIBona, 15809 Park Terrace Drive, stated that the only free standing trees at this
time were on the ridge and he did not want to see them removed. He inquired about a park for their
neighborhood that was promised years and years ago, and that the proposed development site
would be the last available piece of land for such park. He also questioned the changing of zoning
which created narrower lots. He urged the Commission to consider the needs of established
neighborhoods as well as new developments.
Uram responded that the zoning did not create narrower lots and greater density, as the setbacks
remained the same. He stated Parks and Recreation was questioned about a park in this
neighborhood and they did not feel it was possible, but it would be discussed at the next Parks and
Recreation meeting.
Douglas McChane, 6625 Rainbow Drive, stated his concern regarding pollution with the plan for
a holding pond from County Road #4 which would be uncontrolled in its flow. He continued that
from the cul-de-sac the water will run into the creek at a faster volume creating murky water in
Purgatory Creek and it would become an open storm sewer. He inquired if this had been referred to
the DNR or Watershed District. Other concerns were regarding traffic for County Road #4, what
were the future plans. Will it be as wide as Valley View Road. What was the proposed entrance for
Rainbow Drive.
Uram responded that the pollution issues would be looked at by City Engineer, DNR and Watershed
District. A series of catch basins are proposed but would have no effect on fertilization.
Franzen responded that County Road #4 was a collector road. Approximately 7500-10,000 cars per
day travel the road. The capacity for a single lane road was 10,000. The County felt the ideal would
be to align Nancy Drive with Mere Drive. The long range plan would be for four lanes, but was not in
the five year plan.
Gall Beno, 6618 Rainbow Drive, was concerned with the rezoning of the land. She requested if
her lot was 1/2 acre that the adjoining lots be the same size. She felt if trees were removed, the
wildlife would leave as well. She asked if it was contemplated that ecology tests be done on
Purgatory Creek in the years to come.
Bye staled this proposal will come back to the Watershed District. Uram added that DNR would also
check in that issue.
Beno continued that a high number of children were in the area and no park. There was no
overpass or underpass for them to cross County Road #4, which was a very dangerous situation.
She was also concerned with the aesthetic value of the neighborhood with replacement of a 24"
oak with 12 little oaks. She concluded that a by-pass lane at County Road #4 would be a disaster
waiting to happen.
Anderson inquired to Staff what the requirement was for driveway spacing. Franzen responded it
varied. A rural area would be 1200 - 1500 feet and urban area would be a minimum of 150 feet.
Eden Prairie Planning Commission Meeting
July 11, 1988 Page 4
Ruebling commented that there were by-pass lanes at Duck Lake Trail and Terrace Wood. They
were so busy they are a danger at this point. To place another by-pass lane on the road would make
it doubly dangerous.
Commission inquired to Staff the differences in the zoning changes with regard to lot size.
Bye inquired if a stop light would be installed at Duck Lake Trail. Franzen responded not to his
knowledge. She requested that he look into the issue.
Dodge inquired about the road alignment. Proponent responded that this is being platted to save
trees and increase site distance without substantially changing the elevation.
Anderson replied that people were more important to save than trees.
Uram stated that the City and County Engineers have reviewed this site plan, and specific
comments should be addressed to the City Engineer.
Ed Sieber, 11792 Dunhill Road, agent for Stodola properly, stated that the 3-1/2 acres was not
approached by City for purchase or neighbors. The road to the property now was dangerous.
Fell inquired about road alignment possibility. Franzen responded it could be done with loss to
trees and some tight turns.
Commission discussed pros and cons of road alignment and traffic signals.
Ruebling was concerned about the R1-22 homes backing up to two existing homes on the lots.
Proponent responded that from the site, view of the Rainbow Drivehomes was not possible.
Dick Olson, 6615 Eden Prairie Road, felt a traffic signal light was very important for the area.
Ruebling asked, regarding drainage, if the City would review the catch basin issue. Uram stated that
it would be reviewed in greater detail.
Bye asked that the record show 1) that a zoned transition or buffer along the subdivision line be
worked out with the developer; 2) drainage issues must be reviewed by the City Engineer; and 3)
further study should be done regarding the alignement of Nancy Lane and Mere Drive.
Bye asked Staff if DNR should be involved in this project. Uram responded that the DNR would be
involved if it were an environmental issue, however, they typically do not get involved in a
fertilization issue,
Fell stated his objection to the present road alignment. Uram stated that Staff would look again at
the road alignment and sight lines of intersection.
MOTION 1.
Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to close the public hearing.
Motion carried 5-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council approval of
the request of JMS Equities, Inc., for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Public Open
Space to Low Density Residential on 1.9 acres for Eden Creek, based on plans dated June 24,
Eden Prntrie Planning Commission Meeting July 11, 1988
Page 5
1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 8, 1988, and other concerns such as good transition, drainage, pollution, road alignment and park issues.
Motion carried 5-0-0
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to recommend to the City C
o
u
n
c
i
l
approval of the request of JMS Equities, Inc., for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 o
n
6
.
6
a
c
r
e
s
f
o
r
Eden Creek, for single family residential development, based on plans dated Ju
n
e
2
4
,
1
9
8
8
,
subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 8, 1988, and con
c
e
r
n
s
m
e
n
t
i
o
n
e
d
i
n
Motion 2.
Motion carried 5-0-0
MOTION 4:
Motion was made by Dodge and seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Co ..r , approval of the request of JMS Equities, Inc., for Preliminary Plat of 6.6 acres for Eden Creek
f
o
r
t
e
n
s
i
n
g
l
e
family lots, one outlot, and road right-of-way, based on plans dated June 24, 198
8
,
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
t
h
e
recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 8, 1988, and concerns mention
e
d
i
n
M
o
t
i
o
n
2
.
C. MINN SOTA MINI-STORAGE by Bruce Hubbard. Request for Zoning District Change
from Rural to 1-2 for 2.35 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 7.7 acres into one lot for co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
44,255 square feet of storage buildings. Location: Northwest of Flying Cloud Dri
v
e
,
s
o
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
of U.S.Highway #169. A public hearing.
Bruce Hubbard, proponent, presented the project which was a combination of five
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
l
o
t
s
i
n
t
o
1 lot equalling 335,255 square feet or 7.7 acres. He stated that the demand was s
u
c
h
t
h
a
t
expansion was necessary. A new updated look for the development would be the
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
2
-
unit manager's apartment/office containing 2,230 square feet, and increased land
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
.
A
c
c
e
s
s
to the site would be from Flying Cloud Drive via a new 27 foot driveway located wit
h
i
n
t
h
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
o
f
the project, and the existing driveway would be removed.
Fell inquired if the storage units were unheated. Proponent responded yes, with t
h
e
e
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
Building #5, all buildings were unheated.
Fell asked how deep the footings were and proponent stated 3-1/2 to 4 feet and w
e
r
e
s
o
i
l
cushioned instead of floating slabs.
Uram stated that Staff was recommending approval based on their recommend
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
H
e
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
that after this item was scheduled for public hearing, a Comprehensive Guide Pl
a
n
C
h
a
n
g
e
f
r
o
m
Office to Industrial was identified by Staff. Because the required change was n
o
t
i
c
e
d
s
o
l
a
t
e
i
n
t
h
e
process, the public hearing could not legally be held at this meeting. After disc
u
s
s
i
o
n
b
y
S
t
a
f
f
,
h
e
was determined that this item must be continued until the July 25, 1988, Planni
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
meeting. The proponent was agreeable to this but requested to proceed to City
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
a
s
s
o
o
n
a
s
possible. Staff recommends that the Commission order the publication of this ite
m
f
o
r
t
h
e
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
,
1988 City Council meeting.
MOTION:
Motion was made by Fell and seconded by Ruebling to continue the public hearing for Minnesota Mini-Storage to the July 25, 1988, Planning Commission meeting. It would be ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
t
o
o
r
d
e
r
the scheduling of this project for August 2, 1988, City Council meeting at this tim
e
.
Motion carried 5-0-0
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RES. COMMISSION Augu
s
t
1
,
1
9
8
8
-2-
Baker asked about access to the lak
e
.
S
t
r
o
t
h
e
r
s
a
i
d
t
h
e
r
e
will be a 5 bituminous trail along th
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
a
n
d
steps down to the lake.
Baker asked if there will be facilities
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
t
o
e
a
t
b
y
the lake. Strother said only the deck
w
i
l
l
b
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
and this is for private use by the off
i
c
e
.
Baker asked what can be done so th
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
c
a
n
e
a
t
b
y
the lake. Lambert said there are no
p
l
a
n
s
t
o
a
c
q
u
i
r
e
l
a
n
d
for this purpose.
Cross said that grading in the area i
s
m
i
n
o
r
a
n
d
t
h
e
r
e
w
i
l
l
be several retaining walls construct
e
d
.
T
h
e
r
e
i
s
n
o
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
vegetation on the site and the devel
o
p
e
r
i
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
replace 25 caliper inches of trees, b
u
t
t
h
e
y
p
l
a
n
t
o
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
97 caliper inches.
Lambert added that the City require
s
a
p
a
t
h
t
o
b
e
e
i
t
h
e
r
5' concrete or 8' asphalt rather than t
h
e
5
'
b
i
t
u
m
i
n
o
u
s
m
e
n
t
i
o
n
e
d
earlier by Strother.
Joyer said she feels it is important t
o
h
a
v
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
h
e
lake without using steps.
MOTION: Baker moved to recommend
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
t
h
e
P
a
n
n
e
k
o
e
k
e
n
Huis per staff recommendations but p
o
i
n
t
i
n
g
o
u
t
t
h
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
need for a public dining area near th
e
l
a
k
e
s
i
n
c
e
t
h
e
r
e
are no public facilities available at t
h
i
s
t
i
m
e
.
S
h
a
w
s
e
c
o
n
d
e
d
the motion.
On call for discussion, Cook asked i
f
t
h
e
r
e
w
i
l
l
b
e
t
a
k
e
-
o
u
t
available at the restaurant. Strothe
r
s
a
i
d
i
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
e
a
t
-
i
n
only.
Lambert asked if land is to be dedic
a
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
r
will be in an easement. Strother sai
d
t
h
e
r
e
w
i
l
l
b
e
a
n
easement.
The motion passed 6-0.
B. Eden Creek
Refer to staff report dated July 8, 19
8
8
.
Barb introduced Jeff Schoenwetter
w
h
o
w
a
s
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
t
h
e
meeting to review the site located so
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
o
f
C
o
u
n
t
y
R
o
a
d
4 across from Mere Drive. Schoenw
e
t
t
e
r
s
a
i
d
t
h
i
s
i
s
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
a small and simple development with o
n
l
y
1
0
s
i
n
g
l
e
f
a
m
i
l
y
lots. 1.2 acres, which is the majorit
y
o
f
t
h
e
f
l
o
o
d
p
l
a
i
n
,
will be dedicated to the City.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RES. COMMISSION August 1, 1988
-3-
Lambert said that the major parks and recreation issue to
consider is the concern by the neighbors that the City sho
u
l
d
purchase this land for park use. This area is already ser
v
e
d
by two parks, Eden Valley Park and Birch Island Park.
However, neither one is easily accessible from this neighbor
h
o
o
d
since the trail is located on the other side of County Road
4. Staff feels that rather than acquiring this land, it wou
l
d
be easier for the City to construct a trail on the other
side of the road. Lambert added that the City has acquire
d
one-half acre of land close to the railroad tracks thru tax
forfeit.
Richard asked what the plans are for Birch Island Park.
Lambert said the neighbors have different ideas of how
the park should be developed and they have to agree on
what they want to be done.
Cross added that as much as 48 feet of grade change wil
l
occur on this site because it flows to Purgatory Creek.
210 caliper inches or 26.5% of trees on the site will be lo
s
t
.
Average tree loss is 27%. The developer will be replacin
g
200 caliper inches.
Richard asked if the trees that are moved will survive.
Schoenwetter said that if the trees are moved late in fall
and are kept watered, they have a very good chance of
survival.
Cross added that the developer is required to bond for
these trees in case they do not survive.
MOTION: Cook moved to recommend approval of Eden Creek
per staff recommendation. Mikkelson seconded the motion
and it passed 6-0.
VI. OLD BUSINESS
A. Playground Equipment Bids - Eden Lake Park, Willow Pa
r
k
and Wyndham Knoll Park
Refer to memo dated July 29, 1988 from Barb Cross, Lands
c
a
p
e
Architect.
Barb said that the only bid received on Eden Lake School/
P
a
r
k
was from Earl F. Anderson because they had installed the
first phase of the equipment. This work can be completed
before September 1.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-153
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and,
WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council
f
o
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
and comment; and,
WHEREAS, the proposal of Marco Construction for development of P
a
n
n
e
k
o
e
k
e
n
Huis of Eden Prairie for Regional Commercial use requires the ame
n
d
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
,
Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows:
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1
.
2
4
acres located northwest of the intersection of Eden Road and Gle
n
L
a
n
e
b
e
m
o
d
i
f
i
e
d
from Office to Regional Commercial.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 9th day of August
,
1
9
8
8
.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
FROM: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect -4X,,
DATE: July 27, 1988
SUBJECT: Supplemental Staff Report to the July 8, 1988 Plannin
g
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
on Pannekoeken Huis
This project received approval at the July 11, 1988 Planni
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
meeting.
The major issue concerning the Parks, Recreation and Natur
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Commission is the pedestrian system and the connections to th
e
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
community. An 8 bituminous trail was installed along the
e
d
g
e
o
f
L
a
k
e
Idlewild concurrent with the development of Food Fare, the adjac
e
n
t
l
a
n
d
o
w
n
e
r
to the east. The developer of Pannekoeken Huis will continue thi
s
t
r
a
i
l
a
l
o
n
g
the lake to the western property line. As development continue
s
,
t
h
i
s
t
r
a
i
l
is planned to extend all around the lake. A 5' concrete side
w
a
l
k
i
s
a
l
s
o
planned along the property line adjacent to Eden Road. A connect
i
n
g
l
i
n
k
f
r
o
m
the sidewalk along Eden Road to the lake side trail had been p
l
a
n
n
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
the west property line. At the Planning Commission, the adjac
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
owner on the west side was extremely concerned about adequate
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
o
f
the loading dock area. Discussion followed about the trail takin
g
u
p
v
a
l
u
a
b
l
e
screening space and either discontinuing the trail or reloca
t
i
n
g
i
t
.
T
h
e
parks, recreation and natural resources staff feels this c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
s
critical for a public access to the trail around Lake Idl
e
w
i
l
d
.
S
t
a
f
f
recommends shifting the location of the trail from the west
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
property to the eastern edge. This would accomplish several thin
g
s
:
1. It will allow for adequate screening to the loading dock area on
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
property line.
2. The public trail will be more visible because it will connec
t
t
o
t
h
e
sidewalk system already in place along Eden Lane.
AREA LOCATION MAP !
STAFF REPORT
Planning Commission
Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
July 8, 1988
Pannekoeken Huis
Northwest of the intersection of Eden Road a
n
d
G
l
e
n
L
a
n
e
Marco Construction
Suburban National Bank
1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Off
i
c
e
t
o
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
Commercial on 1.24 acres.
2. Zoning District Change from Office to C-Reg
i
o
n
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
o
n
1.24 acres with variances to be reviewed
b
y
t
h
e
B
o
a
r
d
o
f
Appeals.
TO:
FROM:
THOUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Background
The Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide
Plan depicts this site as guided for
Office. Surrounding areas to the
south and east are guided for
Regional Commercial, while the area
to the immediate west is guided for
Office. Specific land uses include
the Eden Prairie Convenience Center,
zoned C-Reg-Service, to the east;
Eden Place Center, zoned C-Reg-
Service, to the south; existing
single family residential, zoned
Rural, to the west; and, Lake
Idlewild to the north. In 1986, the
City Council approved the Idlewild
3rd Addition which was a 14,000
square foot for lease" office
building on this site.
The proponent is requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan and Zoning
District Change from Office to C-
Regional Service to allow for a
7,920 square foot mixed use
restaurant/office building.
Pannekoeken Huis 2 July 8, 1988
Comprehensive Guide Plan Change
This site is currently designated on the 1982 Eden Prai
r
i
e
G
u
i
d
e
P
l
a
n
f
o
r
O
f
f
i
c
e
uses. Adjacent classifications include Regional Commerc
i
a
l
t
o
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
a
n
d
s
o
u
t
h
,
and approximately 2.3 acres guided Office to the west.
A
G
u
i
d
e
P
l
a
n
C
h
a
n
g
e
f
r
o
m
Office to Regional Commercial was approved for the Eden
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
C
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
in 1985.
The important thing in reviewing a Comprehensive Gu
i
d
e
P
l
a
n
C
h
a
n
g
e
o
n
t
h
i
s
particular site, is the use of the property and ho
w
i
t
t
a
k
e
s
a
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
o
f
i
t
s
location on Lake Idlewild. As previously demonstrated,
a
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
v
i
e
w
e
d
as an appropriate land use in this area. The propos
e
d
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
a
n
d
o
f
f
i
c
e
i
s
specifically designed to take advantage of this locatio
n
.
Shoreland Ordinance
Lake Idlewild is classified as a Recreational Develop
m
e
n
t
W
a
t
e
r
w
h
i
c
h
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
a
200-foot setback from the Ordinary High Water Mark of
t
h
e
l
a
k
e
.
R
e
g
a
r
d
l
e
s
s
o
f
t
h
e
lake designation, development on this site would requ
i
r
e
v
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
s
.
T
h
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
Lake Idlewild PUD agreement specified 30-foot structure
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
l
a
k
e
w
h
i
c
h
are different from the current requirements. The pri
m
a
r
y
r
e
a
s
o
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
3
0
-
f
o
o
t
setback is due to the width of the site and that any g
r
e
a
t
e
r
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
w
o
u
l
d
r
e
n
d
e
r
the site undevelopable. The main structure is propose
d
3
5
f
e
e
t
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
O
r
d
i
n
a
r
y
High Water elevation of 853.5 which is comparable to t
h
e
s
a
m
e
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
a
s
t
h
e
E
d
e
n
Prairie Convenience Center. The proposed deck and gazeb
o
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
w
i
t
h
i
n
2
5
f
e
e
t
o
f
the Ordinary High Water Mark. The proponent shall apply
f
o
r
,
a
n
d
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
,
v
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
s
from the Board of Appeals for the following:
1. Minimum lot size less than 10 acres.
2. Minimum setback from the Ordinary High Water Mark less th
a
n
2
0
0
f
e
e
t
.
3. Minimum setback to parking from the Ordinary High Water
m
a
r
k
l
e
s
s
t
h
a
n
5
0
feet.
Site Plan
The site plan depicts the construction of a two-story,
7
,
9
2
0
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
o
o
t
m
i
x
e
d
u
s
e
restaurant/office building on a 1.24-acre site. A Floor
A
r
e
a
R
a
t
i
o
o
f
1
4
.
7
%
a
n
d
a
Base Area Ratio of 9.1% has been calculated. The site pl
a
n
,
a
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
,
m
e
e
t
s
t
h
e
minimum requirements of the C-Regional Service zoning dis
t
r
i
c
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
e
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
the front yard setback to parking which is 171/2 feet. The
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
to apply for and receive a variance from the Board of
A
p
p
e
a
l
s
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
within the front yard setback.
Based upon the land uses proposed, a total of 68 park
i
n
g
s
p
a
c
e
s
a
r
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
T
h
i
s
figure was calculated, using 1 space/3 seats in the
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
(
1
7
0
s
e
a
t
s
)
a
n
d
5
spaces/I,000 square feet for office. A total of 68 park
i
n
g
s
p
a
c
e
s
a
r
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
.
Access to this site is provided by a 25-foot driveway
o
f
f
E
d
e
n
R
o
a
d
d
i
r
e
c
t
l
y
a
c
r
o
s
s
from the intersection at Glen Lane and a second access
t
o
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1
6
0
feet. In order to allow access .to the adjacent prope
r
t
y
,
a
c
r
o
s
s
a
c
c
e
s
s
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
shall be provided along the western property line (se
e
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
A
)
.
B
e
c
a
u
s
e
t
h
e
5-foot concrete sidewalk Will cross any future drive
,
i
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
s
t
r
i
p
e
d
a
n
d
signed when development occurs.
ma,
Pannekoeken Huis 3 July 8, 1988
Traffic
The 1985 MCA traffic study conducted by BR
W
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
2
4
p
.
m
.
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
t
r
i
p
s
f
o
r
this site. Based upon a 4,920 square foot
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
a
n
d
2
,
2
0
0
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
o
o
t
o
f
f
i
c
e
,
a total of 34 p.m. peak hour trips would b
e
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
.
B
e
c
a
u
s
e
t
h
e
p
.
m
.
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
trip generation exceeds the estimate,
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
developer on ways to reduce the p.m. peak
h
o
u
r
t
r
i
p
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
In support of the proposal, the proponent
h
a
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
restaurants at various locations within t
h
e
T
w
i
n
C
i
t
i
e
s
a
r
e
a
o
n
t
h
e
i
r
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
trip generation characteristics. The info
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
w
a
s
f
o
r
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
located near the Maplewood Mall, Southd
a
l
e
,
a
n
d
n
e
a
r
S
o
u
t
h
t
o
w
n
i
n
B
l
o
o
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
.
Based upon a 5 p.m. to 6 p.m. peak hour
t
i
m
e
,
w
i
t
h
a
n
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
2
.
7
p
e
r
s
o
n
s
p
e
r
automobile, Southdale generated the most
p
.
m
.
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
t
r
i
p
s
w
i
t
h
2
5
.
T
h
e
a
v
e
r
a
g
e
p.m. peak hour trip generation is 12. It
a
p
p
e
a
r
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
,
t
h
a
t
the p.m. peak hour for the restaurant is b
e
t
w
e
e
n
7
p
.
m
.
a
n
d
8
p
.
m
.
,
w
h
e
r
e
1
0
3
t
r
i
p
s
were generated at the Southtown and Southd
a
l
e
s
i
t
e
(
s
e
e
a
t
t
a
c
h
e
d
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
)
.
Three alternatives were recommended to t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
.
T
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
alternative was to acquire additional la
n
d
.
B
a
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
t
h
e
t
r
i
p
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
2
4
and on a 1.24-acre tract, a total of 19.35
t
r
i
p
s
a
r
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
,
o
r
1
t
r
i
p
p
e
r
2,251 square feet. To compensate for an
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
1
0
t
r
i
p
s
,
a
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
2
2
,
5
1
2
square feet, or 0.517 acres, would have to
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
t
o
t
h
i
s
s
i
t
e
.
The second alternative is to construc
t
a
s
m
a
l
l
e
r
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
.
U
s
i
n
g
a
t
r
i
p
generation of 6 trips per 1,000 square fee
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
a
n
d
a
s
s
u
m
i
n
g
4 trips generated by the office, a total of 20 tri
p
s
r
e
m
a
i
n
.
T
h
i
s
w
o
u
l
d
a
l
l
o
w
u
p
t
o
a
3
,
3
3
4
square foot restaurant, or a reduction i
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
i
z
e
o
f
1
,
5
8
6
square feet.
The third alternative is to assume the nu
m
b
e
r
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
restaurant which approximated 24 p.m. p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
t
r
i
p
s
a
r
e
a
c
c
u
r
a
t
e
.
I
f
t
h
e
s
e
numbers are used, the office development, a
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
,
c
o
u
l
d
n
o
t
b
e
o
c
c
u
p
i
e
d
a
t
t
h
i
s
time. In order to occupy the office porti
o
n
,
t
h
e
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
w
i
l
l
h
a
v
e
t
o
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
traffic counts to calculate site specific
t
r
i
p
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
.
I
f
i
t
can be established that the p.m. peak hour
t
r
i
p
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
r
a
t
e
i
s
2
0
o
r
l
e
s
s
,
t
h
e
office portion may be allowed to be occupi
e
d
.
T
h
i
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
n
o
t
b
e
a
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
d
u
e
t
o
the fact that the lower level must be built
r
e
g
a
r
d
l
e
s
s
,
d
u
e
t
o
t
h
e
s
l
o
p
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
and that it was originally proposed as a st
o
r
a
g
e
a
r
e
a
.
U
n
t
i
l
s
u
c
h
t
i
m
e
a
s
a
n
o
f
f
i
c
e
use is allowed, this area may be used for s
t
o
r
a
g
e
.
Staff recommends Alternative 3 with the und
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
m
a
y
c
h
a
n
g
e
ownership and that different trip generati
o
n
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
m
a
y
e
x
i
s
t
w
h
i
c
h
e
x
c
e
e
d
the BRW estimate.
Grading
Elevations on this site range from a high
p
o
i
n
t
o
f
8
8
0
i
n
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
t
o
a
low point adjacent Lake Idlewild at 8
5
3
.
5
.
T
h
e
s
i
t
e
i
s
g
e
n
t
l
y
s
l
o
p
i
n
g
i
n
a
northerly direction towards the lake. Th
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
c
u
t
a
n
d
f
i
l
l
o
n
t
h
i
s
s
i
t
e
i
s
relatively minor with a minimal amoun
t
o
f
c
u
t
o
c
c
u
r
i
n
g
a
n
d
a
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
f
i
l
l
o
f
approximately 4 feet within the upper pa
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
4
f
e
e
t
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
h
e
slope to Lake Idlewild. In order to buil
d
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
,
t
h
r
e
e
r
e
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
w
a
l
l
s
a
r
e
being proposed. The retaining walls are l
o
c
a
t
e
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
u
p
p
e
r
a
n
d
l
o
w
e
r
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
Ii n
Pannekoeken Huis
4 July 8, 1988
areis on the eastern side of the pr
o
j
e
c
t
,
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
a
b
o
u
t
s
i
x
f
e
e
t
i
n
h
e
i
g
h
t
w
i
t
h
a
n
additional retaining wall occurin
g
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
t
r
a
i
l
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
L
a
k
e
Idlewild. This wall ranges in heig
h
t
f
r
o
m
1
3
.
5
f
e
e
t
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
l
a
k
e
t
o
0
f
e
e
t
as it proceeds up the slope.
Due to the 17i-foot setback from Ede
n
R
o
a
d
,
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
d
e
p
i
c
t
s
a
3
t
o
4-foot berm between the two drive
w
a
y
s
.
A
b
e
r
m
s
h
a
l
l
a
l
s
o
b
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
southwest corner of the site to help
s
c
r
e
e
n
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
n
d
l
o
a
d
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
.
Utilities
Water and sanitary sewer service is
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
t
o
t
h
i
s
s
i
t
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
m
a
d
e
to an existing 8-inch water line and
a
n
8
-
i
n
c
h
s
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
s
e
w
e
r
l
i
n
e
w
i
t
h
i
n
E
d
e
n
R
o
a
d
.
In order to make the sanitary sew
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
,
a
n
o
p
e
n
c
u
t
o
f
E
d
e
n
R
o
a
d
i
s
proposed. The proponent will be r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
b
o
n
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
o
p
e
n
c
u
t
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
ensure the repair of the street.
Storm water run-off is proposed in
a
n
o
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
e
r
l
y
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
areas collected in a catch basin sys
t
e
m
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
l
o
w
e
r
l
e
v
e
l
.
A
s
e
c
o
n
d
c
a
t
c
h
basin is located along the west sid
e
o
f
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
u
l
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
t
o
L
a
k
e
'
Idlewild.
Landscaping
The landscape plan depicts a total o
f
9
7
.
5
c
a
l
i
p
e
r
i
n
c
h
e
s
o
f
p
l
a
n
t
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
for this site. Based upon a build
i
n
g
s
i
z
e
o
f
7
,
9
2
0
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
,
a
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
2
5
caliper inches are required. In re
v
i
e
w
i
n
g
t
h
e
p
l
a
n
,
S
t
a
f
f
l
o
o
k
e
d
a
t
t
w
o
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
areas. One of the areas was along t
h
e
p
e
r
i
m
e
t
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
E
d
e
n
R
o
a
d
where, due to the lack of berming,
m
a
s
s
p
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
h
e
l
p
s
c
r
e
e
n
t
h
e
parking areas within the 171/2-foot
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
.
T
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
i
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g
a
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
six-foot evergreen trees and some
o
v
e
r
s
t
o
r
y
t
r
e
e
s
.
S
t
a
f
f
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
proponent use a combination of 6
a
n
d
8
-
f
o
o
t
e
v
e
r
g
r
e
e
n
s
.
S
e
c
o
n
d
l
y
,
p
a
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
attention was given to the landsca
p
i
n
g
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
l
a
k
e
s
h
o
r
e
.
T
h
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
p
l
a
n
depicts a variety of lowland type veg
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
r
e
d
-
t
w
i
g
d
o
g
w
o
o
d
,
y
e
l
l
o
w
-
t
w
i
g
dogwood, and other trees which have b
e
e
n
p
l
a
n
t
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
l
a
k
e
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
w
h
i
c
h
g
i
v
e
it that lowland characteristic. The t
y
p
e
o
f
p
l
a
n
t
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
u
s
e
d
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
h
e
l
a
k
e
i
s
similar to that used at the Eden Prai
r
i
e
C
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
.
Architecture
The proposed building is a two-stor
y
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
,
s
p
l
i
t
-
l
e
v
e
l
w
i
t
h
o
n
e
s
t
o
r
y
f
r
o
n
t
i
n
g
Eden Road and a two-story element f
a
c
i
n
g
L
a
k
e
I
d
l
e
w
i
l
d
.
P
r
i
m
a
r
i
l
y
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
contours of the site, the building
t
a
k
e
s
f
u
l
l
a
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
o
f
t
h
e
l
a
k
e
s
h
o
r
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
construction of the gazebo and deck
w
h
i
c
h
f
r
o
n
t
s
t
h
e
l
a
k
e
.
In order to develop an overall arch
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
the area, the architect has in
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
,
c
o
l
o
r
s
,
a
n
d
architectural detailing, as the adja
c
e
n
t
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
E
d
e
n
P
l
a
c
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
,
Eden Prairie Convenience Center, and
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
B
a
p
t
i
s
t
H
o
m
e
s
.
Signage and Lighting
A ground monument sign is propose
d
a
t
t
h
e
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
.
T
h
e
s
i
g
n
s
h
a
l
l
conform to City Code with details b
e
i
n
g
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
p
e
r
m
i
t
i
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
.
Lighting is proposed to be 20-foot d
o
w
n
c
a
s
t
l
u
m
i
n
a
r
s
.
Pannekoeken Buis 5 July 8, 1988
Pedestrian Systems
There is an 8-foot bituminus trail located adjacent
L
a
k
e
I
d
l
e
w
i
l
d
w
h
i
c
h
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
connected to the existing trail adjacent to the Eden P
r
a
i
r
i
e
C
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
.
I
n
addition, the proponent has provided a 5-foot concrete
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
s
i
d
e
of Eden Road and along the western property line whic
h
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
t
h
e
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
the lake.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Based upon traffic Alternative 3, Staff recommends a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
f
r
o
m
Marco Construction for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Cha
n
g
e
t
o
O
f
f
i
c
e
t
o
C
-
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
Service on 1.24 acres and a Zoning District Change from
O
f
f
i
c
e
t
o
C
-
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
on 1.24 acres with shoreland and parking setback vari
a
n
c
e
s
t
o
b
e
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
Board of Appeals, subject to the plans submitted June
2
2
,
1
9
8
8
,
a
n
d
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
t
h
e
following recommendations:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Revise the landscape plan to include a combination o
f
6
a
n
d
8
-
f
o
o
t
evergreen trees along Eden Road to help screen parking
a
r
e
a
s
.
B. Modify the grading plan to maximize a berm height al
o
n
g
E
d
e
n
R
o
a
d
along the southwest corner of the project.
C. Provide samples and colors of exterior building materi
a
l
s
.
2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion cont
r
o
l
p
l
a
n
s
f
o
r
review by the Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off, erosion contr
o
l
p
l
a
n
s
,
a
n
d
utility plans for review by the City Engineer.
3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
B. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hou
r
s
i
n
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
of grading.
C. Submit retaining wall details.
4. Concurrent with Building construction, construct an 8
-
f
o
o
t
w
i
d
e
b
i
t
u
m
i
n
u
s
trail along Lake Idlewild, a 5-foot wide concrete side
w
a
l
k
a
l
o
n
g
E
d
e
n
R
o
a
d
,
and a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the western p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
.
5. Receive approval from the Board of Appeals for vari
a
n
c
e
s
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
f
o
r
parking setbacks and shoreland ordinance variances.
- SERVICE SCREEN WALL
/I
:3 Pannekoeken Huis- Estimated customer counts by day, by hour
1 3
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
. 161
118i
22,
7:00-7:59 7.8 18.4
8:00-8:59 22.9 28.5
'3 9:00-9:59 54.6 20.5
10:00-10:59 25.8 25.6
11:00-11:5? 49.3 22.5
12:00-12:59 58.0 66.5
13:00-13:59 28.3 43.8
14:00-14:53 11.5 7.6
15:00-15:59 8.5 5.6
16:00-16:59 27.5 16.5
17:00-17:59 17.4 36.4
18:00-18:59 46.8 51.6
19:00-19:59 22.4 42.6
20. 20-01-20:59 16.5 9.5
2, 21:00-21:59 14.3 4.4
22:00-22:59 8.5 8.3
8.7 16.1 34.3 41.0 13.4
14.1 49.4 44.2 67.7 66.3
42.5 101.7 62.7 93.8 _127,2
31.9 211 26.6 94.1 133.3
42.4 52.7 47.4 58.5 1313
55.1 54.6 4E,9 '0.7 _122.1
35.3 44.5 42.5 45.1 72.6
12.9 15.3 11.3 15.4 35.9
8,0 13,6 21 ' 13 7 210
20.3 10.1 31.5 10.2 18.6
47.4 51.8 56.6 51.3 56.1
37.5 47.4 82.0 65.0 28.9
35.9 43.5 86.1 37.5 18.6
25.9 27.7 28.0 39.1 6.6
6.4 12.7 22.4 1,3 9,5
3.3 11.4 11.3 0.2 2.7
'25
28.
Estimated cars based on 2.7 customers per car-
81
29i
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
30 7:00-7:59 3 7 3 6 13 15
8:00-8:53 8 11 5 18 16 25 25 32 9:00-9:59 20 8 16 a 23 35 47
3 =' 10:00-10:59 10 9 12 7 14 35 50
3 .., 11:00-11:59 18 12 16 20 18 22 50
35 1 12:00-12:59 21 25 20 20 17 19 45 381 13:00-13:59 10 16 13 16 16 17 27
37 : 14:00-14:59 4 3 5 6 4 6 13
38 ' 15:00-15:59 3 2 3 s 8 5 II 16:00-16:59 10 6 8 4 12 4 7 45 , 17:00-17:59 6 13 18 19 21 19 21
18:00-18:53 17 19 14 18 31 24 14 421 19:00-19:59 8 16 13 16 32 14 .7 4 3 20:00-20:59 6 4 10 10 10 14 2 .4 . 21:00-21:59 5 a 2 5 8 0 4 45, 22:00-22:59 3 3 1 4 4 0 46,
471
401
50
'53,
1'1 3-7
Pannekoeken Huss- Out mated customer counts by day, by hour
1011THD92j Monday Tue.scay Wednesday Thursday Friday Sat u-day 3unaay
7:00-7:59
5.
8:001459
8.0
9:0.9-9:99 --
10:00-10:59
33. 1
11:00-11:59
:9. 3
120X-12:59
36.6
76.4
14400-14:59
19.4
l2"-l5:59
5.6 --
16:0-16:59
6.
17:00-17455 13.5
•4844, 59-_45, 5--
J9:00-19:53 45.8
.20:00-20:59 15.4
- 2 ,24+55 :
22:00-'2i:59 6.0
-47.4 2477--5079--Kt3rir--
• 267!-- --23:i 26 .-4--62:7 -•---115.14 - -• 127.2 --
51.5 47.0 48,4 86.1 37.5 16.6
16.3 22.4 31.0 28.0 39.1 6.6
69.4 59.0 69.5 48.0 85.9 96.3
21.3 28.4 21.5 11.3 15.4 33.9
14.4 27.5 66.2 56.6 78.0 80
36.3 • 49.3 -60.0 85.8 - 115:0 155. 1 •
29.9 54.6 31.0 36.6 116.5 133.9
31.2 25.9 37.2 91.6 120.6 150.4
,3,-1 --E11-7 13.4 21. 2 13.7 - • - - 29. 0 -
5.2 14.7 8.9 11.3 4. e 2.7
0.5 8.1 10.3 31.3 10.2 16.6
5.0 5.6 6.2 34.9 41.0 13.4
3.4 7.8 20.8 44.2 67.7 66.3
:7.: -10.-9 -22.4
Est imated cars based on 2.7 customers per car-
Noma! Tuesday iednesaay Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
2 -17,----
3 1 3 8 16 _i:00-9:59 E 10 9 10 23
-10.1049 12 II 2' 14 44 .11:00-11:59 7 12 10 14 34 -12400,12455 14 11 16 22 32 1344:0-43459- 22 -26 21 26- 48 - 14 : 06-14:59 , 8 11 8 4 15:00-15:59 2 1 4 5 e 124()O-16:59 - 2 -4- -3- -4- 12 17:0--17ff9 5 5 10 25 21
18400-15459 :7 18 9 19 36 19400-19:59 17 - 19.- -17 18 -32 20:0,:,-20:5E E E e 12 10
5 6 6 4 8
4
IS -5
25 25
47
- 50.
45
43 57
36
6 13
5 11
4 7
25 30
32 32
14 .-
14 2
1 4
. 1
_ • y E.
-
Fannevoeken Hun- Est imated customer counts by day, by hour
_7-81ST/KM113X Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
1 . 7:00-7:59 5.9 5.0 5.6 6.2 34.9 17.2 6.4 8:00-8:59 3.5 3.4 7.8 20.8 44.2 67.2 64.2
9:00-9:59 - -15.7 IS.! ...It 26.-4 -6E. 7 95.3 112.1 --- ) 10:30-10:59 31.4 13.9 54.6 31.0 36.6 93.1 133.9
11:0E-11:53 33.2 34.2 23.8 37.2 47.4 78.9 133.9
12:0'-13:59 - --36.-1-- -34:6-49:2-- 11:5 - -4603 -- 50:9 - -122.1 - - , 13:00-11:53 43.5 74.4 85.9 86.3 42.5 45.5 72.6
14:00-14:59 17.0 16.8 19.3 21.5 11.3 15.1 22.1
11.7-- , 3.-4- -21;2 12.7 - - 12.6 , 16:00-16:59 6,0 9.9 8.1 10,3 31.3 20.9 18.6
:70-17:59 11.7 7.8 16.3 18.4 56.6 46.1 56.1
- - ltrt.t.--18:51---18. ,. 79 -€5.0 389 , • 15:00-19:59 46.8 51.5 47.0 48.4 86.1 43.3 18.6 20: OK-2U: 59 22.5 21.0 22.4 35.5 28.0 32.4 6.6 , -21 -tt!-61.35 14. :5.3 17.1 20.2 18:5- /675 --- 9:5 ) • : 22:Ei.)-2:2:53 4.6 5.8 14.7 8.9 8.5 4.4 2.7
Est :mated cars based on 2.7 customers per car-
Mor.-.5ay Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
3 -6
16 25 24
23 35 42
34 • 50 -
8:0E-8:59 1 1 3 8
9:00-9:59 6 7 9 10
-1-017)--1t•t51 - --It ,3--2.',- 11-
11:00-11: 51 12 13 13 14
1i:0)-11:59 ' -
- 13 18 19
13:0'..-12:59 1E
14:00-14:59 6 6 7 8
15:0E-15:59 2 2 A 5
16:03-16:59 2 4
17:0E-17:59 4 2 6 7
18:vE.-:8:59 7 6 8 7
: 9: 0'..--19:n 17 15 17 18
00':I.r.,-2E:59 8 8 8 13
2100-31:59 5 6 6 8
1.22:r ,:-32:57 -2 1.' 5 •-, ...
18
17
16
4
8
12
21
28
32 -
10
7
3
19
17
6
5
8
17
16
12
6
2 -
50
27
8
5
7
21
14
7
2
4
1
Eden Prairie Planning Commission Meeting July II, 1988 Page ri
D. PANNEKOEKEN HUIS OF EDEN PRAIRIE, by Marco Corporation. Request for
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Regional Commercial on 1.24 acres,
Zoning District Change from Office to C-Reg-Service on 1.24 acres with variances to be
reviewed by the Board of Appeals for construction of 7,920 square feet of office and restaurant
use. Location: Northwest of the intersection of Eden Road and Glen Lane. A public hearing.
Norman Brody, proponent, represented the project as a two-story, 7,920 square foot mixed use
restauranVotfice building on 1.24 acres of land. A variance for front yard setback of 17-1/2 feet was
being requested for parking from the Board of Appeals. The design would be a split-level building
with one story facing Eden Road, with a gazebo and deck which fronts the lake. Screening of
adjoining property would be accomplished with mass plantings of six-foot evergreen trees. The
major issue was the BRW 1985 Traffic Study which indicated that the site was allocated 24 trips
during peak hours and the proposed use would generate 34 trips during peak hours. They are
prepared to go with the third alternative recommended by Staff to not occupy the office portion of
the building unless trip generation was established at 20 or less. The office area would be utilized
as storage until such time as an office use was allowed.
Uram stated that with the third alternative as the choice of the developer, it was reasonable to
eliminate the construction of the deck and gazebo from the project until the office portion was
occupied.
Bob and Clare Koolman, 7936 Eden Road. were concerned that with a restaurant adjoining
their property they would have a trash problem, noise from trucks for deliveries as well as refuse
pickup. The lighting of the parking lot and building was also a concern. Bob Kooiman commented to
the Commission that since 1961, zoning plans were made over and over and then cast aside, and
urged members to not forget the rest of the area and how it would fit into the development of the
area. He commented that there was already a number of restaurants on this strip of road, which
creates a traffic problem near their home. He stated that no barrier would truly screen his home from
the activity of the restaurant, arid an office building would be less of a disruption to the area. They
and their neighbors are willing to sell their property when the opportunity arises. He feels the area
should be developed together and not piece by piece.
Uram stated Staff would consider any suggestions by the architect for effective screening.
Proponent stated they could increase the height of the wall to 8 feet and larger plantings could be
used in the area. Uram stated that they should cut sight lines from the Kooiman's home, and that
perhaps landscape screening would be more effective on their property.
Proponent addressed the concerns of the neighbors and stated that hours could be allocated for
deliveries as well as trash pickup. They would be more than willing to accommedate the neighbors.
Perhaps the loading ai ea would have a roof covering to shield truck site.
Clare Koolman commented on the present bottle-neck traffic situation in the area at noon time.
Many people walk because of the vehicle congestion.
Franzen spoke of the sidewalks to encourage more pedestrian activity in the area. He stated that the
highway truck traffic was not foreseen when this area was developed for restaurants.
Anderson inquired if a trail system was in the works for around the lake. Uram responded that Parks
and Recreation would be directed to look into that matter.
Dodge inquired if this would restrict the land between Pannekoeken and Rosemount, and would
retail be more effective. Uram responded that the site was guided office which was acceptable for
retail or office use.
Eden Prairie Planning Commission Meeting July 11, 1988 Page 7
Ruebling stated that a trail access was indicated in the 10 foot setback reducing the setback. Uram
responded than an 8 foot trail located adjacent to Lake Idlewild would be connected to the existing
trail to the Eden Prairie Convenience Center. He added that this could be relocated as the trail does
not go all the way around the lake.
Ruebling inquired about the 50-55% business being on the weekend and if that percentage
changed what alternatives would be available. Uram reported that this was possible and that Staff
would still be comfortable with 30 trips. If the restaurant changed ownership, the trip generation
characteristics could exceed the BRW estimate as well.
Bye stated that City does take all that into consideration but there are different allowable numbers
between office, restaurant and retail. Franzen added that trip generation with reference to building
changing hands would be difficult to enforce. He added that if owners are responsible it would
work, but City gets compliance only 50% of the time.
Dodge inquired as to what protection the City had that the trip generation remain the same if the
building changed hands. Franzen replied that a covenant could be written within the land deed.
MOTION 1:
Motion made by Ruebling and seconded by Fell to close the public hearing.
Motion carried 5-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion made by Ruebling and seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council approval of the
request of Marco Construction for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Regional
Commercial on 1.24 acres for the Pannekoeken Huis of Eden Prairie for construction of 79,020 sq.
ft. of office and restaurant uses, based on plans dated June 22, 1988, subject to the recommend-
ations of the Staff Report dated July 8, 1988, and additional recommendation additional screening
and implementation of screening and timing of refuse pickup.
Motion carried 5-0-0
MOTION 3:
Motion made by Ruebling and seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council approval of the
request of Marco Construction for Zoning District change from Office to C-Reg-Service on 1.24
acres, with variances to be reviewed by te Board of Appeals, for the Pannekoeken Huis of Eden
Prairie for Construction of 79,020 sq. ft. of office and restaurant uses, based on plans dated June
22, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 8, 1988 and
recommendations mentioned in Motion 2.
Motion carried 5-0-0
V. OLD BUSINESS
None
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
Monday, August 1, 1988 7:30 p.m., City Hall
7600 Executive Drive
COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT:
Pat Breitenstein, chairperson;
Bud Baker (late), Moe Cook, Karon Joyer,
Brian Mikkelson, Pat Richard,
Charles Shaw
COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: None
COMMISSION -STAFF:
Bob Lambert, Director of Parks.
Recreation and Natural Resources,
Barb Cross, Landscape Architect
I. ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by chairperson,
Pat Breitenstein.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Lambert added D. Amphitheater Plans under VI. Old Business.
11(0/ ffnt >iiy• tt 111 as amended. Cook
rriirni
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 18, 1988
MOTION: Cook moved to approve the minutes as printed. Joyer
seconded the motion and it passed 6-0.
IV. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
None
V. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
A. Pannekoeken Huis
RefPr to memo dated July 27, 1988 from Barb Cross, Landscape
Architect and staff report dated July 8, 1988.
Barb introduced Paul Strother who is the architect for this
project which is located adjacent to Food Fare northwest
of the intersection of Eden Road and Glen Lane. The proposal
is for a 4000 sq. ft. restaurant with office use on the lower
level. There will be entry points at two locations on Eden
Road. There are two lots involved in this development,
one of which is vacant at the present time. Ash trees
are located on the west lot line and miscellaneous vegetation
on the other lot. The developer is suggesting a variety
of plantings, including pine and evergreen, along Eden
Road to screen parking areas. There will be a deck located
off the office level and a gazebo near the lake. The existing
path will be continued along the lake to the property line
and the sidewalk will be extended to the property line.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL R
E
S
.
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
u
g
u
s
t
1
,
1
9
8
8
-2-
Baker asked about access to the lake. Str
o
t
h
e
r
s
a
i
d
t
h
e
r
e
will be a 5' bituminous trail along the prop
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
a
n
d
steps down to the lake.
Baker asked if there will be facilities avail
a
b
l
e
t
o
e
a
t
b
y
the lake. Strother said only the deck will
b
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
and this is for private use by the office.
Baker asked what can be done so the publi
c
c
a
n
e
a
t
b
y
the lake. Lambert said there are no plan
s
t
o
a
c
q
u
i
r
e
l
a
n
d
for this purpose.
Cross said that grading in the area is mi
n
o
r
a
n
d
t
h
e
r
e
w
i
l
l
be several retaining walls constructed. T
h
e
r
e
i
s
n
o
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
vegetation on the site and the developer i
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
replace 25 caliper inches of trees, but the
y
p
l
a
n
t
o
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
97 caliper inches.
Lambert added that the City requires a pa
t
h
t
o
b
e
e
i
t
h
e
r
5' concrete or 8' asphalt rather than the 5'
b
i
t
u
m
i
n
o
u
s
m
e
n
t
i
o
n
e
d
earlier by Strother.
Joyer said she feels it is important to have
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
h
e
lake without using steps.
MOTION: Baker moved to recommend approv
a
l
o
f
t
h
e
P
a
n
n
e
k
o
e
k
e
n
Hum per staff recommendations but pointin
g
o
u
t
t
h
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
need for a public dining area near the lak
e
s
i
n
c
e
t
h
e
r
e
are no public facilities available at this ti
m
e
.
S
h
a
w
s
e
c
o
n
d
e
d
the motion.
On call for discussion, Cook asked if ther
e
w
i
l
l
b
e
t
a
k
e
-
o
u
t
available at the restaurant. Strother said
i
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
e
a
t
-
i
n
only.
Lambert asked if land is to be dedicated t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
r
will be in an easement. Strother said the
r
e
w
i
l
l
b
e
x
i
easement.
The motion passed 6-0.
B. Eden Creek
Refer to staff report dated July 8, 1988.
Barb introduced Jeff Schoenwetter who w
a
s
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
t
h
e
meeting to review the site located southea
s
t
o
f
C
o
u
n
t
y
R
o
a
d
4 across from Mere Drive. Schoenwetter
s
a
i
d
t
h
i
s
i
s
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
a small and simple development with only
1
0
s
i
n
g
l
e
f
a
m
i
l
y
lots. 1.2 acres, which is the majority of t
h
e
f
l
o
o
d
p
l
a
i
n
,
will be dedicated to the City.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-158
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND
PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 7th day of June order
e
d
a public hearing on the following proposed improvements:
I.C. 52-131 (Hamilton Road Improvements)
WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the Council hearing through two weekl
y
publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held on th
e
9th day of August at which all persons desiring to be heard were given a
n
opportunity to be heard thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered.
2. The City Engineer is hereby designed as the Engineer for this
project and is hereby directed to prepare plans and specifications
for the making of such improvement, with the assistance of
Hanson, Thorp, Pellinen and Olson, consulting engineers.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 9, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
17 4 0
VAC 88-06
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-159
VACATION OF RIGHT OF WAY FOR PART OF
EDENVALE BOULEVARD LOCATED IN SECTION 3
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has a cer
t
a
i
n
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
a
s
follows:
That part of Edenvale Boulevard dedicate
d
i
n
t
h
e
p
l
a
t
o
f
L
A
V
O
N
N
E
INDUSTRIAL PARK, as recorded in the office o
f
t
h
e
R
e
g
i
s
t
r
a
r
o
f
'
T
i
t
l
e
s
,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies s
o
u
t
h
e
r
l
y
o
f
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
e
r
l
y
prolongation of the northerly line of Lot 4,
B
l
o
c
k
1
,
L
A
V
O
N
N
E
I
N
D
U
S
T
R
I
A
L
PARK, said prolongation being a curve conc
a
v
e
t
o
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
h
a
v
i
n
g
a
radius of 430.00 feet.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on August
9
,
1
9
8
8
,
a
f
t
e
r
d
u
e
n
o
t
i
c
e
w
a
s
published and posted as required by law;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
i
s
n
o
t
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
and has no interest to the public, therefore,
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
v
a
c
a
t
e
d
.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Pra
i
r
i
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
a
s
f
o
l
l
o
w
s
:
I. Said right-of-way as above described is hereb
y
v
a
c
a
t
e
d
.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of com
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
o
f
p
r
o
c
e
e
d
i
n
g
s
in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
A
u
g
u
s
t
9
,
1
9
8
8
.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
AUGUST 9,1988
44003 BEAVER MT WATER SLIDE YOUTH OUTING-SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
44004 PICADILLY CIRCUS YOUTH OUTING-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
44005 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 7/8/88
1 1006 CROW WING COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION
44007 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 7/8/88
44008 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 7/8/88
44009 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT & COLLECT CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION
44010 ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION PAYROLL 7/8/88
44011 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG UNION DUES FOR JULY 88
44012 NORTHWEST BANK HOPKINS PAYROLL 7/8/88
44013 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - PERA AUGUST 88 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM
44014 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - PERA PAYROLL 7/8/88
44015 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 7/8/88
44016 CITY-COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 7/8/88
44017 AMERICANA FIREWORKS DISPLAY CO 4TH OF JULY FIREWORKS DISPLAY
44018 AT&T SERVICE
44019 JOAN BABEL REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
44020 STEVIE BECK -THEATRE IN THE PARKS-HISTORICAL &
CULTURAL COMMISSION
44021 DEBORAH BOWERS REFUND-SKATING LESSONS
44022 COMPASS -THEATRE IN THE PARKS-HISTORICAL &
CULTURAL COMMISSION
44023 JOEY CZERNIECKI REFUND-PRESCHOOL-SPECIAL EVENT
44024 EDEN PRAIRIE CRIME PREVENTION STATE GRANT REIMBURSEMENT
44025 KIM GEAROU REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
44026 ANNE KING REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
44027 MARIE KELJIK REFUND-BASEBALL LEAGUE
44028 CATHY KELLY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
"4029 MARCIA KERSHAW REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND
t030 ANNE KING REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
44031 DAVID LANGEFELS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
44032 MICHELLE LEFEVRE REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS
44033 NORTHWESTERN BELL SERVICE
44034 NSP SERVICE
44035 PREMIER RENT A CAR CAR RENTAL-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
44036 DIANA ROHLFSEN REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND
44037 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET -WHEEL NUT/PIPE/GAUGE/TUBE ASSEMBLY/
CIRCUIT BOARD-EQUIPMENT MAINT/WATER DEPT
44038 JEANNE THOMPSON REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND
44039 U S WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE
44040 ELAINE WEDEL REFUND-TEEN VOLUNTEER TRIP
44041 WORLD TREE PUPPET THEATRE -THEATRE IN THE PARKS-HISTORICAL &
CULTURAL COMMISSION
44042 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-CITY HALL
44043 NORTHWESTERN BELL SERVICE
44044 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE
44045 CARLSON & CARLSON ASSOC EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE - HUMAN RESOURCES
44046 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS INC -BALLOONS/PINWHEELS/KITES/BALLS/JUMP ROPE/
-CARD GAMES/WATER PISTOLS/GLASSES/PAIL/
-SHOVEL/GARBAGE CANS-4TH OF JULY
CELEBRATION/PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND
44047 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ -LIGHTBARS/FLASHERS/SIRENS/UNIFORMS/
-EMBLEMS/STROBE LIGHT KIT/SPEAKER/
BRACKETS/WHISTLES/ALARM-POLICE DEPT
048 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV SERVICE
12573279
665.00
35.00
10714.50
252.00
51450.91
4021.00
211.00
1325.80
897.00
900.00
90.00
25850.30
211.50
991.00
6390.00
1685.21
27.00
85.00
24.00
375.00
3.00
2000.00
20.00
19.00
13.00
38.00
19.00
39.00
20.00
12.00
3038.16
1948.51
246.00
19.00
142.09
19.00
133.93
8.25
100.00
5000.00
220.39
1122.49
490.00
518.30
4243.85
98.60
44049
44050
*4 4051
4 1052
44053
44054
44055
44056
44057
44058
44059
AT&T
BURGER KING
JUDY BURTON
JAN BUSHARD
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
ANESHA DAVIS
DUN & BRADSTREET BUSINESS
CINDY ERICKSON
MARY JANE HEINEN
WENDY JENSEN
JOAN KANE
AUGUST 9,1988
SERVICE
EXPENSES-YOUTH ATHLETICS
REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND
REFUND-ARCHERY LESSONS
CONFERENCE-ASSESSING DEPT
REFUND-AFTERNOON ADVENTURE
EDUCATI CONFERENCE-FIRE DEPT
REFUND-VALLEY FAIR TRIP
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND
-REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND/SWIMMING
LESSONS
REFUND-EXERCISE CLASS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-STARING LAKE PARK RENTAL
REFUND-SPECIAL TRIPS/EVENTS
REFUND-SPECIAL TRIPS/EVENTS
REFUND-SKATING LESSONS
CANINE TRAINING-POLICE DEPT
EXPENSES-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND
REFUND-SUMMER SPORTS CAMP
EXPENSES-CITY HALL
CONFERENCE-ASSESSING DEPT
REFUND-ROUND LAKE PARK RENTAL
WINE
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS
CONFERENCE-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS
REFUND-YOUTH CREATIVE ARTS
REFUND-YOUTH CREATIVE ARTS
PLAYGROUND-SPECIAL EVENT/FEES PAID
TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM/FEES PAID
EXPENSES-PLAYGROUND PROGRAMS
FUEL TAX-STREET DEPT
SERVICE
MAPS-ENGINEERING DEPT
MAPS-ENGINEERING DEPT
PERMIT TO CLEAN PURGATORY CREEK
WINE
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
MAPS-ENGINEERING DEPT
SPECIAL EVENT/FEES PAID
SPECIAL EVENT/FEES PAID
PAYROLL 7/8/88
PRINTING-PLANNING DEPT
998.65
4.00
19.00
10.50
270.00
37.00
125.00
13.00
10.69
5.00
75.25
24.00
15.25
25.00
10.00
10.00
24.00
341.40
9.02
42.00
64.64
115.00
25.00
297.75
318.24
4801.50
4280.69
4632.97
656.15
1980.28
13.00
100.00
5.25
5.25
819.90
321.00
46.18
144.64
2762.64
150.00
72.00
50.00
1325.80
4322.31
2986.98
100.46
2978.14
4322.54
48.90
300.00
240.00
44.00
25506.85
1714.25
44060 SUZANNE KEARNS
44061 MAGGIE KOWALSKI
44062 BETTY KRAPU
44063 MARY KUHL
44064 MARY KUHL
44065 CORRINE MARKGRAF
44066 JAMES L MATSON
44067 MC DONALDS
44068 PENNY NEEDHAM
44069 PETTY CASH
44070 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
44071 HOLLY SANDERS
44072 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO
44073 EAGLE WINE CO
44074 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC
44075 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
'076 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
J77 PRIOR WINE CO
44078 QUALITY WINE CO
44079 NICOLE KELJIK
44080 NORMANDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
44081 ELIZABETH PENNEBAKER
44082 JENNIFER SHEEHAN
44083 VALLEY FAIR
44084 VALLEY FAIR
44085 PETTY CASH
44086 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
44087 NSP
44088 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
44089 HENNPIN COUNTY TREASURER
44090 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
44091 EAGLE WINE CO
44092 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC
44093 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
44094 PRIOR WINE CO
44095 QUALITY WINE CO
44096 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
44097 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO
44098 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
44099 MINNESOTA TWINS
44100 MINNESOTA TWINS
d4101 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PERA
02 A 1 PRINTERS INC
6762107
AUGUST 9,1988
44103 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC
(
104 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS
105 AIR SIGNAL
4106 AIRLIFT DOORS INC
44107 ALEXANDER MANUFACTURING CO
44108 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO
44109 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE COMPANY
44110 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC
44111 MARK J ANDERSEN
44112 LEI LONNIE ANDERSON
44113 ANDON INC
44114 ARMOR SECURITY INC
44115 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC
44116 AVR INC
44117 B R W INC
44118 GWEN BARKER
44119 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC
44120 JOHN BENSON
44121 BIFFS INC
44122 BLACK & VEATCH
44123 BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY
124 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
£25 BLUMBERG COMMUNICATIONS INC
44126 BOYUM EQUIPMENT INC
44127 BRAUER & ASSOCIATES LTD
44128 LEE BRANDT
44129 BRAUN ENS TESTING INC
44130 BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES
44131 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC
44132 BSN CORPORATION
44133 BUCKINGHAM DISPOSAL INC
44134 JOHN BULTMAN
44135 BUILTWELL CONSTRUCTION INC
44136 JIM CARLSON LEASING COMPANY
44137 CARVER COUNTY TREASURER
44138 C & N W TRANSP CO
44139 CENTURION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC
44140 CHAPIN PUBLISHING COMPANY
44141 CLEAN SWEEP INC
44142 CLIMATE MAKERS INC
44143 COLUMBIA BUILDING MAINTENANCE INC
0 '1 144 COMEDIA THEATRE
3574529
-OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/2 DESKS-$473.20
BUILDING DEPT
LOCK REPAIR-POLICE DEPT
PAGER SERVICE-POLICE FORFEITURE-DRUGS
-GARAGE DOOR REPAIRS-POLICE BUILDING/
PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING
BATTERIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
VCR & CASE-POLICE FORFEITURE-DRUGS
CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
-SEATBELTS/SWING SEATS/HOOKS-PARK MAINT/
SIGNS-STREET MAINTENANCE
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
EXPENSES-1988 ICE SHOW COSTUME COORDINATOR
HELIUM TANKS-4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION
-3RD QUARTER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-PARK
MAINTENANCE
BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE
CEMENT-STREET MAINTENANCE
-SERVICE-TRAFFIC STUDY/MAJOR CENTER AREA
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
TAGBOARD/MARKERS-4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION
BATTERIES/SIGNAL LIGHTS-EQUIPMENT MAINT
GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE
SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDITION
-FILM/FILM PROCESSING-POLICE DEPT/FORESTRY
-DEPT/SENIOR CENTER/COMMUNITY CENTER
PLANNING DEPT
JUNE 88 IMPOUND SERVICE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION
-SANDER BLADES/REPLACE BELTS ON HYDRAULIC
PUMP-SEWER DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
SERVICE-PURGATORY CREEK/RECREATION AREA
SERVICE-4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION
-SERVICE-BENNETT PLACE & BLOSSOM RD/
PRESERVE BLVD
SERVICE-HOMEWARD HILLS ROAD
GRAVEL-STREET MAINTENANCE
BALLS/BOW STRING-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND
JULY 88 TRASH DISPOSAL
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
SUN CONTROL FILM PANEL-POLICE BUILDING
-JUNE-AUGUST 88 LEASE AGREEMENT-POLICE
DEPT
-SERVICE-HWY 212 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
STATEMENT & STUDY REPORT
STORM SEWER RENTAL AGREEMENT
SQUAD CAR SETUP-POLICE DEPT
LEGAL ADS-ENGINEERING DEPT
STREET SWEEPING-PARK MAINTENANCE
AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER
-WINDOW TINT FOR SURVEILLANCE VAN-POLICE
FORFEITURE-DRUGS
-THEATRE IN THE PARKS-HISTORICAL &
CULTURAL COMMISSION
914.01
58.00
117.95
1046.92
93.36
579.00
120.03
491.14
270.00
550.80
116.00
142.50
91.62
151.38
8752.60
11.70
305.53
300.00
136.77
7215.84
121.55
457.50
70.00
257.05
1854.16
140.00
2482.59
185.00
28.58
45.87
744.00
945.00
225.00
900.00
2455.94
180.00
1780.00
431.80
492.40
233.70
105.00
145.00
AUGUST 9,1988
44145 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION -ENGINEERING MANUALS/SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW
ROAD TO COUNTY ROAD 4
11 14146 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER
SPEAKER REPAIRS-ENGINEERING DEPT
1147 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC CEMENT CURE-STREET MAINTENANCE
44148 CONTACT MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS -RADIO REPAIR & INSTALLATION-POLICE DEPT/
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
44149 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIP INC 3 AIR TANKS-SEWER DEPT
44150 CONTROL DATA TEMPS SERVICE-PLANNING DEPT
44151 PEPSI COLA COMPANY -CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-ROuND LAKE PARK/
COMMUNITY CENTER
44152 COPY EQUIPMENT INC -PRINTING-PLANNING DEPT/PAINT/PEN/LEVEL/
SUPPLIES-ENGINEERING DEPT/PAINT-SIGNS
44153 CORNERSTONE ADVOCACY SERVICE 2ND QUARTER 88 SERVICE FOR BATTERED WOMEN
44154 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS INC JULY 88 INSURANCE CONSULTANT
44155 BETTY CRAIG & ASSOCIATES SLIDE PRESENTATION-SENIOR PROGRAMS
44156 CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS INC VALVE-FIRE DEPT
44157 D & K PRINTING PLUS INC -PRINTING-SENIOR PROGRAMS/SUNBONNET DAY
FLYERS-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION
44158 DEM CON LANDFILL INC WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE
44159 DONS SOD SERVICE SOD-STREET MAINTENANCE/EDEN BROOK PARK
44160 JENNIFER DRESSEN EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER
44161 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER
44162 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
44163 TOM EASTMAN MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER
44164 E P PHOTO FILM/FILM PROCESSING-POLICE DEPT
44165 CHRIS ENGER JULY 88 EXPENSES-PLANNING DEPT
44166 FAIRCHILD MARKETING ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES
44167 FLAGHOUSE BASEBALLS-YOUTH ATHLETICS
168 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
169 FOX MCCUE & MURPHY 1987 AUDIT SERVICE
44170 G & K SERVICES COVERALLS/TOWELS-WATER DEPT
44171 GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT CORP 3 FIRE TRUCKS-FIRE DEPT
44172 GETTING TO KNOW YOU ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES
44173 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD WATER CUPS-FITNESS CENTER
44174 GME CONSULTANTS INC -SERVICE-WYNDHAM CREST/WYNDHAM KNOLL/
HIDDEN GLEN 3RD ADDITION
44175 GROSS OFFICE SUPPLY -OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT/TABLE-POLICE
FORFEITURE-DRUGS
44176 ROBERT F HANNON HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
44177 JAMES THOMAS HALE GOLF INS1RUCTOR/FEES PAID
44178 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC -SERVICE-BLUFFS EAST 4TH ADDITION/SUNNY-
-BROOK RD/NEMEC KNOLLS/PIONEER TRAIL &
-COUNTY RD 18/FRANLO RD/HAMILTON RD/
SOUTHWEST STUDY AREA/BLUFF ROAD
44179 HARDRIVES INC LIMESTONE-STREET MAINTENANCE
44180 HAUENSTEIN & BURMEISTER INC SCREW REMOVER/SCREWS-HOMEWARD HILLS PARK
44181 TILFORD E MELLING JR SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
44182 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER MAY 88 BOARD OF PRISONERS
44183 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT MAY & JUNE 88 BOOKING FEES
44184 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER -SERVICE-BAKER ROAD/TRAFFIC SIGNALS-VALLEY
VIEW ROAD & PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE
44185 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER POSTAGE-VOTER REGISTRATION VERIFICATIONS
44186 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER FILING FEE-PLANNING DEPT
44187 D C HEY COMPANY INC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-FIRE DEPT
'88 GARY H1LDEN REFUND-VARIANCE REQUEST
32014417
1275.05
INS
566.22
838.47
46.75
413.50
256.68
1500.00
530.00
75.00
191.89
300.64
150.00
1524.25
59.67
797.08
65.07
10.00
21.97
200.00
350.00
96.36
483.08
8800.00
537.78
175500.00
171.00
39.00
2355.40
480.30
238.00
252.00
32177.98
242.01
51.40
120.00
1781.37
557.38
86468.32
64.05
312.00
30.00
125.00
AUGUST 9,1988
189 HOFFERS INC FIELD MARKING-PARK MAINTENANCE 123.25
44190 HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC DEHUMIDIFIER REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 42.00
44191 HONEYWELL PROTECTION -3RD QUARTER 88 SECURITY SERVICE-LIQUOR 416.33
STORE
44192 JOHN HOPKO -SERVICE-INSPECTION OF ATHLETIC FIELDS- 400.00
PARK MAINTENANCE
44193 MIKE HOSTETLER HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 105.50
44194 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #272 PRINTING-SENIOR CENTER 8.40
44195 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC -COPIER TONER-POLICE DEPT/MAINTENANCE 249.00
AGREEMENT-CITY HALL
44196 INTERSTATE DIESEL PRODUCTS INC -REPLACE STARTER/INSPECTED BRAKE PROBLEM/ 254.40
INSPECTED BATTERY TERMINAL-FIRE DEPT
44197 ISS INTER SERVICE SYSTEM JULY 88 JANITORIAL SERVICE-CITY HALL 1160.00
44198 GARY ISAACS SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 510.00
44199 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 16.48
44200 NANCY JOHANNS EXERCISE INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 150.00
44201 JOHNSON BLOCK & READY MIX INC CEMENT-EDENVALE PARK 295.75
44202 K & L TENT RENTAL INC -TENT & STAGE RENTAL-4TH OF JULY 140.00
CELEBRATION
44203 TOM KEEFE SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 120.00
44204 BRADLEY J KNUTSON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 195.00
44205 SUE LANE MILEAGE/SUPPLIES-ELECTIONS 27.76
44206 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD -MARCH 88 LEGAL SERVICE/MARCH 88 LANDFILL/ 18262.39
MARCH 88 COMMUNITY CENTER LITIGATION
44207 LEEF BROS INC COVERALLS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 83.75
?08 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC JUNE 88 LEGAL SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFIL 8685.48
209 LEROY SIGNS INC SIGNS-FIRE DEPT 94.50
44210 LION'S TAP EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 290.12
44211 LOUISVILLE LANDFILL INC WASTE DISPOSAL-STREET MAINT/PARK MAINT 136.00
44212 LYMAN LUMBER CO -PLYWOOD/STAPLES/TREATED LUMBER/TIMBERS- 691.42
PARK MAINTENANCE/DRAINAGE CONTROL
44213 M & M PRINTING INC PRINTING-FIRE DEPT 1098.00
44214 MAACO AUTO PAINTING -BODY REPAIRS TO 85 FORD RANGER-EQUIPMENT 559.00
MAINTENANCE
44215 MARINE RESCUE PRODUCTS INC BUOYS/ROPE-PARK MAINTENANCE 199.85
44216 MARSHALL & SWIFT BOOK-ASSESSING DEPT 46.00
44217 MASYS CORPORATION -AUGUST 88 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-POLICE 1295.00
DEPT
44218 PHILIP MATHIOWETZ SCHOOL-BUILDING DEPT 297.30
44219 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT 54.00
44220 METRO PRINTING INC ANIMAL CONTROL CARDS-POLICE DEPT 371.00
44221 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION AUGUST 88 SEWER SERVICE CHARGES 136607.35
44222 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-ROUND LAKE PARK 210.35
44223 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP CONCRETE/BLACKTOP-STREET DEPT/PARK MAINT 250.98
44224 MINNESOTA COMMUNICATIONS CORP -JULY 88 PAGER SERVICE-FIRE DEPT/POLICE 159.00
DEPT/SEWER DEPT
44225 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY -FLASHLIGHTS/BULBS/HELMET LIGHT HOLDERS/ 474.25
EXTINQUISHERS/POLES-FIRE DEPT
44226 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BEVERAGE ASSO DUES-LIQUOR STORE 300.00
44227 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES 410.40
"9 28 MODERN WINDOW SHADE CO VENETIAN BLIND-POLICE BUILDING 168.00 29 MOTOROLA INC RADIO REPAIR-FIRE DEPT 68.10
44230 WM MUELLER & SONS INC GRAVEL-PARK MAINTENANCE 45.04 44231 MY CHEESE SHOP EXPENSES-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 23.25
44232 NATIONAL SCREENPRINT T-SHIRTS-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND 203.25
17529765
AUGUST 9,1988
1233 DOUG NORD
44234 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
44235 NORTHLAND MECHANICAL
44236 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC
44237 OCHS BRICK & TILE CO
44238 KIM OREN
44239 HARRY H ORTLOFF
44240 ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY INC
44241 JOHN PALMER
44242 JOHN PARKER
44243 JAMES PAULZINE
44244 JACK PEARSON
44245 BOB PENBERA
44246 PERSONNEL POOL
44247 PET CREMATION SERVICE
44248 RICHARD R PETERSBURG
44249 PHOTON INC
44250 PICHA GREENHOUSE
44251 PLUNKETTS INC
44252 POMMER COMPANY INC
44253 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC
44254 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
44255 SQUARE CUT
'4256 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
44257 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
44258 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
44259 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
44260 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
44261 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN
44262 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING
44263 PREMIER RENT A CAR
44264 PUMP & METER SERVICE INC
65 R & R SPECIALTIES INC
44266 R C I INDUSTRIES INC
44267 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS OF MN
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 270.00
SERVICE 56.54
REFUND-PLUMBING PERMIT 120.50
CALCULATOR REPAIR-LIQUOR STORE 85.80
CEMENT-STREET MAINTENANCE/PARK MAINT 64.50
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 210.00
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 270.00
JULY 88 PEST EXTERMINATING SERVICE 96.00
REFUND-BUILDING PERMIT 525.00
MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 32.40
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 30.00
-THEATRE IN THE PARKS-HISTORICAL & 156.00
CULTURAL COMMISSION
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 15.00
SERVICE-BUILDING DEPT 127.20
SERVICE 40.00
EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT 10.00
FILM/FILM PROCESSING-ASSESSING DEPT 14.77
PLANTS-COMMUNITY CENTER 75.00
CHEMICALS-PARK MAINTENANCE 96.90
HOCKEY TROPHIES-ADULT HOCKEY 30.00
-WIRING FOR DISHWASHER/GARBAGE DISPOSAL/ 221.45
RANGE-SENIOR CENTER/LIGHTS-POLICE BLDG
MOSQUITO SPRAY/BATTERIES-CITY HALL 14.49
FILING CABINETS-POLICE BUILDING 650.45
-LAWN CHAIR/BRUSHES/ANT TRAPS/NOZZLE/ 519.79
-SCREWS/NUTS/CONNECTORS/SPRINKLER/COUPLER/
-TAPE/PAINT/PADLOCK/KEYS/BULBS/PAINT
-ROLLERS/BATTERIES/SPARK PLUGS/TONGS/FOOD
-SAVERS/SHELVES/BRACKETS/AIR HOSE/GLUE/
COOKIE SHEETS/SANDPAPER-COMMUNITY CENTER
-SCREWS/BRACKETS/DRILL BITS/SNAP HOOKS/ 369.86
-ROPE/THREADED RODS/BOLTS/CONNECTORS/TAPE/
-BATTERIES/PAINT/BRUSHES/PAINT ROLLERS/
-HANGER/ANCHORS/STAPLES/WASHERS/FLOATS/
WATER SEAL/MOPS/CONCRETE PATCH-PARK MAINT
-HOOKS/COOLER/SANDPAPER/PAINT/ADAPTORS/ 285.08
-PIPES/RUST REMOVER/PAINT THINNER/LOCKS/
HANDLE/WRENCH-SEWER DEPT
-LETTERS/HOSE ENDS/TROWEL/GLOVES/WASHERS/ 159.51 -CAP ENDS/HOSE COUPLINGS/PAINT BRUSHES/
-PAINT THINNER/SAW/SHARPENING STONE/OIL
ENAMEL-STREET DEPT
-CHAIN/LOCKS/WRENCH SET/TOOL BOX/FANS/ 211.42 -HINGES/BOLTS/BATTERIES/CLASPS/TAPE/HOSE
-NOZZLE/HOOKS/BUSHINGS/COUPLERS/WASHERS/
DRILL BITS-WATER DEPT
LAWN MOWER PARTS-POLICE BUILDING 29.28 PRINTING-ASSESSING DEPT 106.90 CAR RENTAL-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 246.00 NOZZLE/PUMP HOSES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 235.28 -ZAMBONI BLADES SHARPENED-ICE ARENA- 53.20 COMMUNITY CENTER
CLEANING SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT
58.84 SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
12.31
549947
11 4/1
AUGUST 9,1988
44268 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC -SERVICE-TECHNOLOGY DRIVE/VALLEY VIEW RD-
-GOLDEN TRIANGLE DRIVE/HIDDEN GLEN 3RD
-ADDITION/GOLDEN TRIANGLE DRIVE/WYNDHAM
CREST/MITCHELL ROAD TO COUNTY RD 1
44269 RIVIERA FINANCIAL SERVICES NUTS/WASHERS/SCREWS/CAPS-EQUIPMENT MAINT
44270 ROGNESS SERVICE SALES WHIRLPOOL WASHER-COMMUNITY CENTER
44271 KEVIN SCHMIEG MAY 88 EXPENSES-BUILDING DEPT
44272 SEARS CALCULATOR-FINANCE DEPT
44273 SEXTON DATA PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
44274 SEXTON PRINTING INC -PRINTING-SUMMER BROCHURE-RECREATION
ADMINISTRATION
44275 DR JOSEPH SHAPIRO ROUND LAKE STUDY
44276 RANDY SHIMANSKI SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
44277 STEVEN R SINELL CONFERENCE/JULY 88 EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT
44278 SMITH DIVING DIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
44279 SNAP PRINT INC PRINTING-HISTORICAL A CULTURAL COMMISSION
44280 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP SOCKET SET/METRIC TOOLS-EQUIPMENT MAINT
44281 SNOWDRIFTERS SNOWTRAILS DNR METRO GRANT REIMBURSEMENT
44282 SODERQUIST SERVICES INC MOWING-PLEASANT HILL CEMENTERY/CITY LOTS
44283 SOUTHDALE BRANCH YMCA YMCA YOUTH OUTREACH PROGRM-2ND QUARTER 88
44284 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC -LEGAL ADS-PLANNING DEPT/EMPLOYMENT ADS-
PARK MAINTENANCE
44285 STAR TRIBUNE SUBSCRIPTION-FIRE DEPT
44286 STORYTALERS -THEATRE IN THE PARKS-HISTORICAL &
CULTURAL COMMISSION
44287 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ -AUTO DOOR OPENER/UNIFORM EMBLEMS-POLICE
DEPT
44288 SUPERIOR PRODUCTS KEG TAPPERS-LIOUOR STORE
"4289 JOSEPH E SUTCLIFFE GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
f 290 NATALIE SWAGGERT JULY 88 EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES
44291 T G POWER SYSTEMS PANEL PROTECTOR-POLICE BUILDING
44292 TARGET 220 -RADIO/GOLFBALLS/ALBUMS/FILM-4TH OFJULY
CELEBRATION/POLICE DEPT
44293 KEVIN TIMM SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
44294 TODD PUBLISHING BOOK-ASSESSING DEPT
44295 NANCY TOUVE SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
44296 VALARIE TRADER AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
44297 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS -POM POMS/FELT/BIRD FEEDER KITS/NECKLACE
KIT-OUTDOOR ADVENTURE/AFTERNOON ADVENTURE
44298 TROPICAL SNO OF MN CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-ROUND LAKE PARK
44299 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO WELDING WIRE-PARK MAINTENANCE
44300 TWIN CITY TESTING -SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER LITIGATION/FIRE
STATION #3
44301 UNITED BUSINESS PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
44302 UNIVERSAL BATTERIES-STREET DEPT
44303 ROD UTING MILEAGE/MEETING EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
44304 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICES UNIFORMS-CITY EMPLOYEES
44305 VAN 0 LITES INC BULBS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
44306 ALVIN VAN HORN SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
44307 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC CART RENTAL-4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION
44308 VIKING SPECIALTY SOFTBALL BATTERS BOX MAT-PARK MAINTENANCE
44309 CLARK WALKER SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
44310 WATER PRODUCTS CO -METER CONNECTORS/HOSE-BUILDING DEPT/SEWER
DEPT
POOL PUMP REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 11 WATER1TE INC
55088.45
134.32
150.00
200.00
133.13
86.60
5384.23
3375.00
300.00
490.00
360.00
11.70
134.65
417.63
653.50
2625.00
617.64
70.20
200.00
298.50
233.61
282.00
200.00
450.00
86.04
123.00
16.50
540.00
125.00
161.96
196.64
54.54
2580.92
461.37
108.00
231.02
469.00
51.72
285.00
48.00
319.90
270.00
80.43
80.87
7818607
AUGUST 9,1988
44312 WATSON FORSBERG
44313 DON WENDLING
44314 WESTERN CARPET DRY CLEANING SERVI
44315 WHEELER LUMBER OPERATIONS
44316 JOE WIETHOFF
44317 WILSON TANNER GRAPHICS
44318 XEROX CORP
44319 YOUNGSTEDTS INC
44320 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
44321 KAY ZUCCARO
44322 HOPKINS POSTMASTER
31435 VOID OUT CHECK
43829 VOID OUT CHECK
43960 VOID OUT CHECK
43976 VOID OUT CHECK
44014 VOID OUT CHECK
44323 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION
44324 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
44325 CROW WING COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
44326 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
44327 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO
44328 HENNEPIN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION
44329 ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION
1330 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC
.331 MINNESOTA UC FUND
44332 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - PERA
44333 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN
44334 UNITED WAY
44335 PETTY CASH
44336 KAY BERGMANN
44337 LINDA BERGMAN
44338 BIRTCHER WELSH
44339 TONY BONGAARTS
44340 NANCY BOURNE
443e1 LYNETTE CARLSON
44342 BILL CARR
44343 CITICORP NORiH AMERICA INC
44344 MARY JANE HEINEN
44345 SARA HILLER
44346 JASON-NORTHCO PROP NI
44347 SUE JOHNSON
44348 BETTY KLOOS
44349 NANCY LARSON
44350 DIANE LEWIS
44351 LINDA NELSON
44352 NSP
44353 CAROL OVERMAN
44354 ALBERT PICHA
355 FRAN RADICK
PAYROLL 7/22/88
PAYROLL 7/22/88
CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION
PAYROLL 7/22/88
PAYROLL 7/22/88
CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION
PAYROLL 7/22/88
AUGUST 88 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM
2ND QUARTER UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
PAYROLL 7/22/88
AUGUST 88 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM
PAYROLL 7/22/88
SPECIAL EVENT-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS
AUGUST 88 RENT-CITY HALL
REFUND-OUTDOOR ADVENTURE
REFUND-VALLEY FAIR TRIP
REFUND-ADULT TENNIS LESSONS
REFUND-OUTDOOR ADVENTURE
AUGUST 88 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
AUGUST 88 RENT-LIQUOR STORE
REFUND-VALLEY FAIR TRIP
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-ADULT TENNIS LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-ADULT TENNIS LESSONS
SERVICE
REFUND-VALLEY FAIR TRIP
-REFUND-SPECIAL EVENT-SENIOR CITIZEN
PROGRAM
REFUND-ADULT GOLF LESSONS
90.00
59.90
45.70
215.04
505.20
300.00-
2990.00-
385.48-
4792.85-
25850.30-
1096.00
10520.43
252.00
51486.30
4021.00
211.00
1325.80
11953.40
1521.87
25207.56
18976.11
211.50
55.00
30.00
26.00
17596.36
30.00
13.00
20.00
30.00
HALL 426.93
19.00
19.00
5518.75
14.00
24.00
12.00
20.00
12.00
62589.88
13.00
8.00
31.00
REFUND-HYDRANT DEPOSIT
-2 PORTABLE 2-WAY RADIOS/BATTERY PACKS/
-SPEAKER/ADAPTORS/BELT CLIPS-POLICE
FORFEITURE-DRUGS
CARPET CLEANING-COMMUNITY CENTER
NAILS-EDENVALE PARK
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-HOMESTEAD CARDS-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL
-COMMISSION/EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER-HUMAN
-RESOURCES/SENIOR CITIZEN CARDS-SENIOR
CENTER/BUSINESS CARDS-CITY HALL
JUNE 88 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL
WHEEL ALIGNMENT-EQUIPMENT MAINT/FIRE DEPT
FIRST AID SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
AQUA AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
POSTAGE-UTILITY BILLING
59.35
1384.00
233.00
176.00
90.00
395.00
18222545
AUGUST 9,1988
44356 HOLLY RAKOCY
44357 HOLLY RADOCY
44358 KATHY RUCKER
( 1359 MARION SMETANA
44360 CHERYL VAN HORN
44361 GLORIA WANEK
44362 MICHAEL WRIGHT
44363 BILL CARR
44364 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF SAFETY ENGINE
44365 AT&T
44366 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
44367 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIAT
44368 NSP
44369 U S WEST CELLULAR INC
44370 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS
44371 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD
3142733
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND
REFUND-FAMILY RESIDENT MEMBERSHIP
REFUND-VALLEY FAIR TRIP
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-OUTDOOR ADVENTURE
REFUND-OUTDOOR ADVENTURE
CONFERENCE-BUILDING DEPT
SERVICE
MANUALS-ENGINEERING DEPT
CONFERENCE-BUILDING DEPT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
-APRIL 88 LEGAL SERVICE/MAY 87 COMMUNITY
CENTER LITIGATION
20.00
22.00
15.00
165.00
13.00
19.25
30.00
30.00
990.00
106.23
122.40
535.00
13914.81
150.92
158.27
15135.45
$1021879.29
nso
DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS
( J GENERAL
11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT
15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M
17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE
20 CEMENTARY OPERATIONS
21 POLICE FORFEITURE
2 2 STATE AID CONST
31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP
33 UTILITY BOND FUND
39 86 FIRE STATION CONST
45 UTILITY DEBT FD AR8
51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD
57 ROAD IMPROVEMENT CONST FD
73 WATER FUND
77 SEWER FUND
81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND
31021879.29
420543.27
1801.72
27708.63
14884.44
230.00
2413.95
2735.94
10367.64
8548.34
176728.90
100.00
165738.46
2939.67
45273.67
138870.33
2994.33
(
t
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-161
RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING
PREPARATION OF 1988 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLS AND SETTING
HEARING DATE
WHEREAS, contracts have been let for the following listed improvements
a
n
d
the total project cost, including expenses incurred, or to be incurred
a
n
d
the City's share, exclusive of that assignable to City Property, are est
a
b
-
lished as shown on the attached Exhibit A.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY O
F
E
D
E
N
PRAIRIE:
1. The cost of such improvements to be specially assessed are hereby
declared to be those as set forth in Exhibit A.
2. The City Clerk with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be assessed for each
improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land
within the district affected without regard to cash valuation, as
provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed
assessment in the office of the Deputy Clerk for public inspection.
3. A hearing shall be held on the 6th day of September, 1988, in the
Eden Prairie City Hall, 7600 Executive Drive, at 7:30 p.m. to
pass upon such proposed assessments and at such time and place
all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be
given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such
assessments.
4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the
hearing on the proposed assessments to be published once in the
official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing.
He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of record
of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two
weeks prior to the hearing.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 9, 1988.
Gary D. Petersion, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
iza
EXHIBIT A 1988 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS PROJECT I. I.C. 52-089 Watermain, storm sewer, curb & gutter and bituminous surfacing on Valley View Road west of Golden Triangle Drive. 2. I.C. 52-104 Sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermain and streets on Prairie View Drive and St. Andrew Drive. 3. I.C. 52-105 Watermain, sanitary sewer, streets and storm sewer on Bennett Place and Blossom Road. 4. I.C. 52-105A TOTAL COST CITY FUNDS AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $112,005.00 $ 3,414.00 $108,591.00 $370,560.00 $ 7,257.00 $363,303.00 $456,417.00 $ 4,663.00 $451,754.00 Storm sewer, sanitary sewer, $ 60,343.00 $ 0 $ 60,343.00 watermain and streets in on Windsor Terrace. 5. I.C. 52-109 Streets, storm sewer, watermain and sanitary sewer in Sunnybrook Road west of Homeward Hills Road. $131,684.00 $131,684.00
PAGE 2 OF 2 EXHIBIT A - 1988 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 6. I.C. 52-110 Sidewalk along West 76th Street. $ 5,921.00 $ 0 $ 5,921.00 7. I.C. 52-117 Watermain from Baker Road to Rowland Road north of Bryant Lake. 8. I.C. 52-119 Sanitary sewer and watermain to serve Shady Oak Ridge. 9. I.C. 52-121 Streets and utilities to serve Nemec Knolls. 10. SUPPLEMENTALS $202,307.00 $195,766.00 $ 75,690.00 $139,757.00 $ 43,587.00 $ 62,550.00 $152,179.00 $ 75,690.00 Trunk Sewer and Water Lateral Sewer and Water Ring Road Re Ring Road Storm Sewer Prairie Center Drive 51-308A Defer Reassess Eden Heights Exclusion Trunk Exclusion Connection Fee Reassessment of Chatham Woods $1,014,037.40 28,826.00 754.60 2,055.68 3,100.00 41,954.84 26,369.67 3,440.00 50,420.00 97,292.22
FOX, McCUE & MURPHY
WITIMOMMUCACIIMWMNITS
250 PRAIRIE CENTER DRivr.
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344
JOHN E FOX C.PA.
WIELIAM N MrCUE, CPA
JAMES S. MURPHY. ( PA
JAMES D 1.05 C.PA.
JOHN J BRAND. (PA
UDEN P05I00
16121 940.6166
01.1 11 Pi AIN'
1612)445-669)
To the Mayor and City Council
City of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Dear Mayor Peterson and City Council:
The purpose of this letter is to provide highlights of the 1987 audited finan-
cial statements and to communicate certain other matters which came to our
attention during our examination. The 1987 highlights, which are presented in
the Selected Financial Information section, are analyzed separately for each
fund.
A report under separate cover has been issued in conjunction with the City's
1987 general purpose financial statements in order to comply with the Single
Audit Act of 1984. The separate report is filed with the State Auditor's office
and is available for use by your sources of federal program monies. Certain
internal control weaknesses and legal compliance issues have been addressed in
that report.
SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
General Fund
The following schedule compares the actual revenue and expenditures with the
amended budget approved by the City Council:
Variance
Original Amended
Favorable
Budget Budget* Actual (Unfavorable)
Total revenue, including
transfers
Total expenditures
$8,483,600 $8,483,600 $9,163,330
9,020,400 9,150,400 9,136,552
$679,730
13,848
Surplus (Deficit) $ (536,800) $ (566,800) $ 26,778 $693,578
* The original budget was amended in June 1988 by Council resolution. The
amendments resulted in certain line item changes within the revenue and expen-
diture categories, including a $130,000 increase in the overall spending
level.
-2-
The overall General Fund expenditures increased nearly 19% over the 1986 l
e
v
e
l
.
The 1987 spending included significant increases in the following areas:
general government expenditures ($380,000); public safety ($229,000); publi
c
works ($233,000); contingencies ($350,000). The general government expendi
t
u
r
e
s
are abnormally higher than anticipated due to a general insurance payment
of $121,000 in 1987 that was attributable to prior years. The "contingenci
e
s
"
category includes expenses to relocate and equip the new City Hall ($261,00
0
)
,
landfill legal fees ($25,000), certain storm damage costs ($53,000), and o
t
h
e
r
miscellaneous items. The July storm is a factor in the increased public saf
e
t
y
and public works departments, in addition to anticipated growth.
Overall general fund revenues increased 11.3% from the 1986 level. The inc
r
e
a
s
e
is only 5% if the engineering administration transfer of $520,230 in 1987 i
s
excluded in the comparison since a similar transfer was not performed in 19
8
6
.
The increase in revenue was lower than recent years due to the following: vi
r
-
tual elimination of the federal revenue sharing program; sharp reduction in
c
o
m
-
mercial building permit fees and lower landfill fees. The 1987 revenues inc
l
u
d
e
$98,800 in federal and state aid to help defray storm damage costs.
The excess revenue over expenditures during 1987 increased the General Fu
n
d
f
u
n
d
balance to nearly $2.3 million at December 31, 1987 of which 20%, or $458
,
9
0
0
,
o
f
this amount has already been reserved for 1988 expenditures or the severa
n
c
e
benefit program. The unappropriated fund balance of $1,835,349 represents
1
8
%
of the 1988 budgeted expenditures which is considered reasonable. The fun
d
balance position was improved significantly as a result of 1987 overhead t
r
a
n
s
-
fers as follows:
Utility fund
Liquor operations
Tax increment administration
Engineering fees on assessment
projects
$ 10,000
100,000
200,000
520,230
$830,230
The transfer of the engineering fees from assessment projects does not cons
i
d
e
r
certain other 1986 and 1987 project activity which will be calculated at a
l
a
t
e
r
date.
Special Revenue Funds
Total federal assistance monies included $3,401 in revenue sharing aid and
898,660 from the Community Development Black Grant (CDBG) program. At Dece
m
b
e
r
31, 1987, the City had approximately $103,000 in approved CDBG funds for which
the specific projects (such as housing rehabilitation or scattered site hous
i
n
g
)
have not been completed. Additional federal assistance funds were obtained
f
r
o
m
the Federal Emergency Management Agency for disaster aid and civil defense a
n
d
have been included in the General Fund operations.
-3-
Special Assessments Funds
Due to the application of new accounting principles, the Special Assessments
Fund has been broken down into its construction and debt service components--
and were respectively reclassified to the Capital Project and General Debt
Service Funds. This represents a significant change in the presentation of the
City's financial position as noted in the discussion below. The City's revenue
recognition policy also was changed whereby revenue is now being recognized as
the assessments are collected, as opposed to the previous accounting policy
which immediately recorded all revenue during the year of the levy.
New levies approximated $4.5 million in 1987. Collections of current and
delinquent levies have been good. A significant reduction in the amount of
delinquent special assessments is attributable to properties which were sold
through tax forfeiture proceedings or for which reassessments were made (for
instance, Chatham Woods).
General Debt Service Funds
The City has generated significant assets in its debt service funds for the
eventual payment of principal, interest and fees on existing general obligation
and special assessment bond issues. The overall fund balance at December 31,
1987 is approximately $36.9 million. The increase in debt service fund assets
from the 1986 level of $9.7 million is due to the inclusion of the special
assessments debt funds as required by new accounting principles.
The fund balance of the tax increment debt service fund has now reached $9.66
million. This amount, when combined with the $2.16 million remaining in the
Capital Projects Fund, provides nearly $11.83 million in cash for the ultimate
repayment of the outstanding TIF bonds of $18,025,000 which are callable in
1990. In addition to the yearly tax increments collected through the County
($4,628,000 in 1987), deferred special assessments of $2.6 million will be
collected through the year 2001. It appears likely that future cash flows will
be sufficient to retire the tax increment bonds near the first call date.
Capital Projects Funds
Expenditures in the Capital Projects Funds for 1987 were in excess of $14
million and include: the water plant expansion; community center litigation and
repairs; new fire station; land acquisition and park improvements; and numerous
road improvements projects. State aid revenue of $1.3 million was accrued for
the Mitchell and Baker Road projects. Due to the City's significant cash
surpluses in its investment pool, the water system and other public improvements
have not yet been funded through new bond issues. The large cash deficits in
certain capital projects funds will require replenishment in the future.
Investment Fund
Idle cash funds generated an average yield of 6.5% during 1987 (7.9% in 1986 and
10.4% in 1985). The average monthly cash and investment balance during 1987 was
$19,641,000, as compared to $17,898,000 in 1986.
-4-
The reduction in income is partially attributable to low
e
r
y
i
e
l
d
s
w
h
i
c
h
w
e
r
e
available in late 1986 and early 1987, as compared to pr
e
v
i
o
u
s
y
e
a
r
s
.
W
e
r
e
c
o
m
-
mend that the City curtail the use of bank repurchase
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
w
h
i
c
h
y
i
e
l
d
a
lower rate of return. We noted that non-interest bear
i
n
g
b
a
n
k
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
Community Center and liquor stores often carried exces
s
c
a
s
h
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
s
,
a
s
d
i
d
the general account on occasion. We concur with the fina
n
c
e
d
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
'
s
d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
to use staff assistance in shopping for favorable investm
e
n
t
r
a
t
e
s
a
n
d
t
e
r
m
s
.
Liquor Fund
Overall liquor operations resulted in a net income of
$
1
0
6
,
1
7
0
(
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
s
i
t
e
:
$9,544; Prairie Village: $96,626). Sales volume increa
s
e
d
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
b
y
1
0
.
9
%
w
i
t
h
Prairie Village growing by 12.9% and Preserve Mall by
8
.
2
%
.
T
h
e
g
r
o
s
s
m
a
r
g
i
n
s
reflected by both stores are quite similar and are in l
i
n
e
w
i
t
h
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
y
a
v
e
r
a
-
ges. The gross margins and inventory turnover ratios w
e
r
e
a
g
a
i
n
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
store manager and finance director for analyzing store
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
.
T
h
e
n
e
t
profit of $106,170 represents an overall 32% return on
a
s
s
e
t
s
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
business. The Preserve store's low profitability was a
f
f
e
c
t
e
d
b
y
l
o
w
e
r
g
r
o
s
s
profit margins and an increase in certain expenses.
Utility Funds
Overall revenues increased 29% from 1986 as a result of
t
h
e
r
e
c
o
r
d
l
e
v
e
l
s
o
f
water pumped during 1987 (1.7 billion gallons). No cha
n
g
e
i
n
u
s
e
r
r
a
t
e
s
occurred during 1987. On an overall basis, the utility
f
u
n
d
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
a
$147,000 net income in 1987 (as compared to a $272,000
l
o
s
s
i
n
1
9
8
6
a
n
d
$
6
6
,
0
0
0
income in 1985) after removing depreciation expense whic
h
i
s
n
o
t
b
u
i
l
t
i
n
t
o
the rate structure.
The Utility Fund developed a deficit working capital si
t
u
a
t
i
o
n
a
s
a
r
e
s
u
l
t
o
f
the significant loss sustained in 1986. Despite the lar
g
e
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
u
s
a
g
e
during 1987, this working capital deficit continues to
e
x
i
s
t
.
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
e
x
p
e
n
-
ditures of nearly $164,000 in 1987 is the major reason
f
o
r
t
h
e
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
improve the Utility Fund's liquidity from 1986. It will
b
e
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
t
o
m
o
n
i
-
tor the recently revised billing structure in light of t
h
e
d
o
u
b
l
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
w
a
t
e
r
plant capacity in 1988.
We hope that this letter will be useful to you and we wo
u
l
d
b
e
p
l
e
a
s
e
d
t
o
discuss the above information further at your convenienc
e
.
Very truly yours,
Ad_
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
June 28, 1988
MEMORANDUM
TO
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
City Manager Carl J. Jullie
Finance Director John Frane
Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson
1988 Second Quarter Financial Status Report
August 5, 1988
The financial status report for the second quarter o
f
1
9
8
8
i
s
a
t
t
a
c
h
e
d
.
I
t
shows that 55.3 percent of the funds in the adjusted
b
u
d
g
e
t
r
e
m
a
i
n
available with 52 percent of the year remaining (thr
o
u
g
h
J
u
n
e
2
4
)
.
B
y
J
u
n
e
30, nearly 84 percent of revenue had yet to be recei
v
e
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
l
y
,
b
o
t
h
the expense and revenue patterns are within expectati
o
n
s
.
Expenses: Most of the program expenses to date are w
i
t
h
i
n
r
a
n
g
e
s
t
h
a
t
o
n
e
would expect by looking at the percentages shown in t
h
e
b
u
d
g
e
t
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
column. A few programs may appear somewhat over or u
n
d
e
r
e
x
p
e
c
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Explanations for these variances follow:
Elections expenses will occur in the last half of the
y
e
a
r
with the general election.
Forestry has a large balance because much of its acti
v
i
t
y
occurs during summer months when tree inspectors are
o
n
s
t
a
f
f
.
Due to a highly competitive market, the City was unabl
e
t
o
attract any summer tree inspectors.
Adaptive Recreation programming did not begin until Ap
r
i
l
upon execution of the joint powers agreement with the
cities of Bloomington, Edina, and Richfield.
Finance covers part of the cost of the City audit, a o
n
e
-
t
i
m
e
expense which was paid in June and skews the expense p
a
t
t
e
r
n
.
Criminal Prosecution and Legal_ Counsel had billings fo
r
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
months through June which had not been processed.
Civil Defense maintenance contract invoices have not
b
e
e
n
received nor has the $14,000 new siren been installed
.
Shared Services General is the program from which th
e
City's liability insurance is paid. The annual premi
u
m
i
s
paid in one lump sum. This $112,210 payment occurre
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
the second quarter.
Shared Services City Offices shows 46.9 percent of t
h
e
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
remaining. This percentage is under 50 percent becau
s
e
t
h
e
July rent was paid in June. Without this rent payme
n
t
,
5
3
.
3
percent of the balance would be available.
-2-
Revenue: Most of the City's revenue is disbursed by other units of
government which follow statutory requirements on when funds are
distributed. Taxes and intergovernmental revenues comprise about two-
thirds of the City's revenue, yet only two percent of these revenues have
been received.
Under Fees, a large balance of revenue has yet to be collected.
This revenue source is filled toward the end of the year as
license applications will be filed for 1989.
Court Fees are received from Hennepin County two months after the
monthly totals are calculated. Receipts shown are from January
through April 1988.
Receipts for Building Permits remain a concern. Approximately
$520,000 of the $1.4 millionbudgeted has been received. For
comparison, through the second quarter of 1987, $660,000 of the
$1.2 million budgeted had been received. However, significant
fee revenue will be received from several major projects coming
on line yet this year: Marriott Courtyard, Eden Place Center
(Ciatti's), Hoyt Technology Park VII and VIII, Abby's Restaurant
expansion, and Cedar Ridge School. Historically, there has been
a surge in housing starts in the fall in order to get a jump on
winter construction. Finally, the City may consider raising some
of its permit fees as allowed by the Uniform Building Code.
Recommendation: It is recommended that Council receive and approve the
1988 second quarter financial report.
CWD:JDF:CJJ:jdp
Attachments
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
1988
GENERAL FUND
EXPENDITURES
527. OF THE BUDGET YEAR IS LEFT
ADJUSTED
BUDGET
BUDGET
EXPENDED
BALANCE % BALANCE
LEGISLATIVE
ELECTIONS
CITY MANAGER
ASSESSING DEPT
BLDG INSPECTION DEPT
PARKS/RECREATION
ADMIN & PARK PLAN
PARK MAINTENANCE
PARK CAP. OUTLAY
FORESTRY
RECREATION ADMIN
COMMUNITY CENTER
BEACH
ORGANIZED ATHLETIC
RECREATION-YOUTH
RECREATION-ADULT
RECREATION-ADAPTIV
HIST & CUL ARTS
FINANCE
HUMAN RESOURCES
HUMAN SERVICES
PLANNING DEPT
POLICE DEPT
POLICE
CRIMINAL PROSEC
CIVIL DEFENSE
ANIMAL CONTROL
FIRE
FIRE & POLICE BLDGS
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT
ENGINEERING
STREETS & DRAINAGE
EQUIPMENT MNTC
SNOW & ICE CONTROL
STREET LIGHTING
P/N & PARK BLDG
SHARED SERVICES
GENERAL
DATA PROCESSING
LEGAL COUNSEL
CITY OFFICES
PUBLIC INFORMATION
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS &
TRAINING
RESERVE
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
58400
52900
131300
259500
415700
127600
530000
52000
130800
114500
510300
43300
202200
139500
94988
25900
15800
192500
104300
73700
334100
1896300
90000
22300
36900
400800
138200
520300
829300
419100
92000
150000
57000
371812
77000
131000
274400
26100
11020(X)
10426500
26880
2319
67219
121832
189791
57261
230803
16710
35417
42388
264873
8910
70039
67467
25686
394
3817
100925
46771
24054
149489
874739
17121
741
17462
133209
58817
227427
375196
197611
37614
78620
19957
258243
38015
24112
7733
571382
31520
50581
64081
137668
225909
70339
299197
35290
95383
72112
245427
34390
132161
72033
69302
25506
11983
91575
57529
49646
184611
1021561
72879
21559
19438
267591
79383
73
4541104
221489
54386
71380
37043
113569
38985
106888
128737
1E067
530618
159809
54.0%
95.6%
48.8%
53.1%
54.3%
55.1%
56.5%
67.9%
72.7%
63.0%
48.1%
79.4%
65.4%
51.6%
73.0%
98.5%
75.87.
47.6%
55.2%
67.4%
55.3%
53.9%
81.0%
96.7%
52.7%
66.87.
57.4%
56.3%
54.8%
52.8%
59.1%
47.6%
65.0%
30.5%
50.6%
81.6%
46.9%
70.4%
48.27.
87.57. 182700 22891
4659598 5766902 55.37.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
1988
GENERAL FLND
REVENLES
50% OF THE EUDGET YEAR IS LEFT
ADJUSTED
BUDGET
BUDGET
RECEIVED
BALANCE Y. BALANCE
TAXES
6147200
153700
5993500
97.5%
LICENSES
99000
13600
85400
86.74
BUILDING PERMITS
1400000
520255
879745
62.87. OTHER PERMITS
30000
6050
23950
79.8%
FEES
485500
92600
392900
REV FROM OTHER AGENCIES
COMMUNITY CENTER FEES
RECREAaION PROGRAMS
COURT FEES
INFEREST
USE OF FUND BALANCE
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
456200
453800
289190
240000
100000
657900
44410
0
224600
203650
64870
50000
328950
14900
456200
229200
85540
175130
50000
328950
29510
100.0%
50.5%
29.6%
73.0%
50.0%
50.0%
66.4%
TOTAL GFJ\ERAL FUNDS
10403200
1673175
8730025 83.97.
(6
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
City Manager Carl J. Jullie
Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson
Waste Management Commission
August 4, 1988
Earlier this summer, the City Council requested that the structure of a waste
management commission be developed and that an ordinance be prepared to create
this advisory body. While Council discussion focused on solid waste management
and abatement matters, Councilmembers agreed the scope of responsibility of the
proposed commission be broad so that it may include other environmental waste
issues which could emerge in the future. Accordingly, the outline for a waste
management commission has been prepared.
Enabling Ordinance: A broad ordinance establishing a waste management
commission has been prepared. Simply put, the duties of the commission would be
to advise the Council on the management of the following environmental wastes:
I) solid waste;
2) liquid waste (including swage);
3) hazardous waste;
4) nuclear waste;
5) other wastes which may be identified.
The commission would also keep informed about actions and requirements made by
other units of government and their impact upon the City. Finally, the
commission would establish programs to disseminate information regarding waste
management practices within the City.
A commission comprised of seven members is suggested, as are three-year
staggered terms.
Other Models of Waste Management Commissions:
Apparently, no other community in the Twin Cities area has a commission such as
the one contemplated by the Eden Prairie City Council. Environmental waste
issues, particularly in the area of solid waste, have been addressed by cities
with the use of ad hoc task forces or committees. Several cities have taken a
slightly different tack by folding solid waste abatement into the
responsibilities of energy awareness and conservation committees which were
formed during the energy shortages of the early 1980s.
Two cities have standing advisory commissions on solid waste management. The
City of Ramsey established its Landfill Advisory Commission in October 1986 in
order to make recommendations regarding waste management, land use, and
infrastructure issues in and around the landfill owned and operated by Waste
Management of Minnesota, Inc. In November 1974, the City of Edina created a
Recycling Commission in order to establish and operate a recycling center. In
recent years, commission members have advised the City Council regarding the
broader scope of recycling. Staff members from each city stressed that clear
direction from the City Council in expectations and responsibilities is
necessary for effective commission participation.
IT:;())
-2-
Charge to the Commission: While the proposed ordinance language is necessarily
broad for flexibility in future circumstances, the Council may wish to consider
a specific charge to begin the Commission's work. Because Council discussion to
date has focused on solid waste management issues, the following charge could be
made.
The City of Eden Prairie wishes to have a responsible and
effective system to manage solid waste and minimize the
amount of waste to be placed in sanitary landfills. The Waste
Manaement Commission shall examine the waste management system
as it now exists in Eden Prairie, the waste abatement programs
and facilities to be implemented by public and private
organizations, legislative mandates from other governments and
their effects on the City, and the plans prepared by the City
to abate solid waste from landfills. The Commission shall also
seek public comment to assess preferences in solid waste
abatement measures. Commission members shall develop plans
for, and participate in the dissemination of information on
solid waste abatement programs to be made available by the
City, other governmental agencies, and private companies.
Alternatively, Council could appoint Commission members and allow them to
develop their own plan and priorities.
Membership: Membership could be based "at large" from residents and employees
in the City, or could have members appointed to represent specific interested
groups such as environmentalists, teachers, civic organiations, trash haulers,
refuse processors, businesses, and multi-family developments. It is suggested
that membership be kept "open", but that Council consider diverse representation
where possible when making appointments to the Commission.
Recommendation: If Council wishes to create this commision, it is appropriate
that Council approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 34-88 as proposed and
may be amended. It is further recommended that Council adopt and/or amend the
proposed charge to the Commission as well as make a determination on the size
and representation of its membership.
CWD:CJJ:jdp
rts()R
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 34-88
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Eden Prairie ordains that
i
t
s
Ordinance Code shall be amended by adding the following:
Section 2.19 WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Subd. 1. Establishment and Composition. A Waste Management Commission composed of seven (7) members, is hereby established for the
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
of advising the Council in all matters of waste management as they aff
e
c
t
t
h
e
City. Commission members, who shall either be residents of the Cit
y
o
r
b
e
employed within the City, shall serve staggered three-year terms.
Subd. 2. Duties. The duties of the Waste Management Commission are
to advise the Council concerning the following:
A. Review and make recommendations regarding the management of
environmental wastes: solid; liquid (including sewage); hazardous; nucl
e
a
r
;
and other wastes which may be identified.
B. Keep informed about actions and requirements made by other
units of government and their impact upon the City.
C. Establish programs to disseminate information to residents
regarding aspects of waste management practices within the community an
d
t
h
o
s
e
actions and/or programs the City may conduct to address such issues.
Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective from and after
i
t
s
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Ede
n
Prairie on the day of , 1988, and finally read and
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said
C
i
t
y
o
n
the day of , 1988.
ATTEST:
City Clerk Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of ,1988.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commissi
o
n
THRU: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & N
a
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
FROM: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect,i/r
_
.
,
DATE: July 29, 1988
SUBJECT: Playstructure quotes for Eden Lake
S
c
h
o
o
l
/
P
a
r
k
,
W
i
l
l
o
w
P
a
r
k
,
W
y
n
d
h
a
m
Knoll Park
Bid results for playstructures are tabulated
a
n
d
s
u
m
m
a
r
i
z
e
d
a
s
f
o
l
l
o
w
s
:
EDEN LAKE SCHOOL/PARK - PHASE II
Earl F. Anderson/Landscape Structures
$15,000 Flanagan Sales/Quality Industries
no bid T.S. Howard/Hilan Structures
no bid Bob Klein Associates/Miracle Recreation
no bid
WYNDHAM KNOLL PARK
Earl F. Anderson
Flanagan Sales
T. S. Howard
Bob Klein Associates
WILLOW PARK
Earl F. Anderson
Flanagan Sales
T. S. Howard
Bob Klein Associates
EVALUATION SCORE
299
326
360
-o-
326.5
298.10
348
333.5
PRICE
$8,000
8,710
8,000
no bid
8,000
8,000
8,000
8,000
Earl F. Anderson installed the 1st phase o
f
p
l
a
y
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
a
t
E
d
e
n
L
a
k
e
School/Park late last summer. The same com
p
a
n
y
,
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
i
n
g
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
Structures play equipment, was the only bid su
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
f
o
r
t
h
i
s
p
h
a
s
e
,
d
u
e
t
o
the complexity of adding onto an existing s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
.
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
,
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
o
r
s
,
colors, etc. must be matched to be func
t
i
o
n
a
l
,
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
a
e
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
a
l
l
y
pleasing. The bid was compared against cat
a
l
o
g
p
r
i
c
e
s
a
n
d
i
s
a
l
e
g
i
t
i
m
a
t
e
price. Staff recommends awarding the contrac
t
t
o
E
a
r
l
F
.
A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
for the stated price of $15,000. The money i
n
i
t
i
a
l
l
y
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
e
f
r
o
m
c
a
s
h
p
a
r
k
fees, but the City will be reimbursed by the
s
c
h
o
o
l
o
v
e
r
a
t
h
r
e
e
y
e
a
r
p
e
r
i
o
d
with carnival proceeds.
The playstructure evaluation form, which
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
e
n
c
l
o
s
e
d
,
w
a
s
u
s
e
d
t
o
evaluate bids for Wyndham Knoll and Willow P
a
r
k
.
T
h
i
s
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
m
w
a
s
p
u
t
together last fall in an effort to be less su
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
t
h
a
n
t
h
e
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
f
o
r
m
.
Hilan Structures achieved the highest scor
e
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
p
r
i
c
e
o
f
$8,000 for each structure.
MAI
Due to the high score on the evaluation sheet, which was enclosed with
a
l
l
b
i
d
information, staff would recommend approval of the Hilan Play equipme
n
t
f
o
r
Wyndham Knoll Park and Willow Park. The contract to T. S. Howard C
o
m
p
a
n
y
would be in the stated amount of $8,000 for each structure, and will be
f
u
n
d
e
d
through cash park fees. Staff feels comfortable making that recommen
d
a
t
i
o
n
but feels the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Council should know the following information:
Both neighborhood groups had input into the process of select
i
n
g
a
playstructure for their neighborhood park. Residents sifted through
c
a
t
a
l
o
g
s
of all playground manufacturers and both groups chose the same struc
t
u
r
e
.
T
h
e
structure the neighbors selected was from the Landscape Structure
c
a
t
a
l
o
g
.
The structure has 3 swings, 7 platforms with heights ranging from 1
4
"
t
o
7
0
"
and two slides; one at 36" and one at 70. This playstructure was
c
h
o
s
e
n
b
y
the neighbors because of the accessibility and the appeal for all ag
e
g
r
o
u
p
s
.
Parents said they felt comfortable allowing their small children on t
h
i
s
p
i
e
c
e
of equipment without worrying about safety. Other reasons were
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
structure had an attractive appearance and a wide variety of play expe
r
i
e
n
c
e
s
.
Although the Hilan Structure has similar equipment, the neighborh
o
o
d
s
m
a
y
remember it is not the one they selected.
Competitive bids are a necessary process and an attempt is made to acc
e
s
s
e
a
c
h
bid as fairly as possible through an evaluation sheet. In this case
,
p
o
i
n
t
s
were scored for height of decks and slides rather than accessibil
i
t
y
a
n
d
enjoyment for all age groups. Perhaps the evaluation sheet should be
a
m
e
n
d
e
d
to try and award points for accessibility to small children, safety,
v
a
r
i
e
t
y
of play experiences, aesthetic appeal, etc.
BPC:mdd
PARK RARE: \KIIII(XL3 176.1
COMPANY NNE:11:10CL11lSalia
EVALUATION CRITERIA:
SLIDES
55 Spira15.5'
Straight
Tube 4.
Wave
Double
Roller
SWINGS
10 points/foot of height
5 points/foot of height
8 points/foot of height
7 points/foot of height
6 points/foot of height
8 points/foot of height
16 Belt (each) 2p8
Tire
Exerglide
77 L.DECKS bs-qcti-a- -2, 3
34-NETS - CARGO irDsF
I point/foot of height
3 points/foot of height
5 points/foot of height
I point/s.f. x 1/2 point/foot of height
I point/s.f. x 1/2 point/foot of height
HORIZONTAL CONNECTORS
ZOTube/Tunne14'
5 points/linear foot
Clatter Bridge
5 points/linear foot
Ramp
2 points/linear foot
Horizontal Ladder
1 point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot of
height
Rings
1 point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot of
height
Bar with Handles
1 point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot of
height
Trolley Ride
2 points/foot of lenght x 1/2 point/foot
of height
CLIMBERS
2.2.5Arch 5'
Ribbonslide
Steps
Vertical Ladder
Corkscrew
Hoop Tunnel
Chain Ladder
BALANCE
Balance Beam
Log Roll
Chain Walk
OTHER
Firemans Pole
Chinning Bar
Parallel Bar
ZWheel
Z.-Window Panel/Wall
Tic Tack Toe
2 points/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot
of height
1 point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot of
height
1 point/step
1 point/foot
3 points/foot of height
3 points/foot of height
2 points/foot of height
I point/linear foot
5 points/linear foot
2 points/linear foot
1 point/foot of height
1 point/linear foot
2 points/linear foot
2 points each
2 points each
5 points
;76,5
ry,q
PARK NAME: \Mil-N(11-10M 6-61
COMPANY NAME: Rancoan CDILO TrYl.
EVALUATION CRITERIA:
SLIDES
Gc,Spiral
Strai g ht
Z 8 Tube
Wave
Double
Rol l er
10 points/foot of hei g ht
5 points/foot of hei g ht
8points/foot of height
7 points/foot of hei g ht
6 points/foot of hei g ht
8 points/foot of hei g ht
(incs Su) nc* Lncluclacitr +Dial taircuico, add er)
Belt (each)
Tire
Exer g lide
1 point/foot of hei g ht
3 points/foot of hei g ht
5 points/foot of hei g ht
90 DECKS IC>f/CULct- 1 point/s.f. x 1/2 point/foot of hei g ht
41 2f-NETS - CARGO 1 point/s.f. x 1/2 point/foot of hei g ht
HORIZONTAL CONNECTORS
Tube/Tunnel
2,5 Clatter Brid g e
Ramp
241-Horizontal Ladder
Rin g s
Bar with Handles
Trolley Ride
CLIMBERS
Z7 Arch
Ribbonslide
Steps
14-Vertical Ladder
Corkscrew
Hoop Tunnel
Chain Ladder
BALANCE
Balance Beam
Log Roll
Chain Walk
OTHER
5 points/linear foot
5 points/linear foot
2 points/linear foot
1 point/foot of len g th x 1/2 point/foot of
hei g ht
1 point/foot of len g th x 1/2 point/foot of
hei g ht
1 point/foot of len g th x 1/2 point/foot of
hei g ht
2 points/foot of len g ht x 1/2 point/foot
of hei g ht
2 points/foot of len g th x 1/2 point/foot
of hei g ht
1 point/foot of len g th x 1/2 point/foot of
hei g ht
1 point/step
1 point/foot
3 points/foot of hei g ht
3 points/foot of hei g ht
2 points/foot of hei g ht
1 point/linear foot
5 points/linear foot
2 points/linear foot
Firemans Pole
Chinnin g Bar
Parallel Bar
Z Wheel
1.-Window Panel /Wall
Tic Tack Toe
122 to- 7-S-
1 point/foot of hei g ht
1 point/linear foot
2 points/linear foot
2 points each
2 points each
5 points
Li
"2
-
.-"trrir um-mosino wfr
)
r166,
0.q
PARK NAME: 1,4'0\1bl-41=01_ ?-NCL1-• Psi2 k=-.
COMPANY NAME: E.Ftt uziry-krape
EVALUATION CRITERIA:
SLIDES
0 Spiral ,/ 10 points/foot of height 2,
zpi Straight 5(!,' 5 points/foot of height
Tube 8 points/foot of height
Wave 7 points/foot of height
Double 6 points/foot of height
Roller 8 points/foot of height
SWINGS
445 Belt (each)* IV 1 point/foot of height
Tire 3 points/foot of height
Exerglide 5 points/foot of height
11 9 DECKS IOSSChe-CL. 1 point/s.f. x 1/2 point/foot of height
NETS - CARGO 1 point/s.f. x 1/2 point/foot of height
HORIZONTAL CONNECTORS
gC) Tube/Tunnel
Clatter Bridge
Ramp
Horizontal Ladder
Rings
Bar with Handles
Trolley Ride
CLIMBERS
Arch
oll.Ribbonslide
3 Steps
1 Vertical Ladder
Corkscrew
Hoop Tunnel
Chain Ladder
BALANCE
Balance Beam
Log Roll
Chain Walk
5 points/linear foot
5 points/linear foot
2 points/linear foot
1 point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot of
height
I point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot of
height
1 point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot of
height
2 points/foot of lenght x 1/2 point/foot
of height
2 points/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot
of height
1 point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot of
height
1 point/step
1 point/foot
3 points/foot of height
3 points/foot of height
2 points/foot of height
1 point/linear foot
5 pointS/linear foot
2 points/linear foot
OTHER
es 5 Firemans Pole
Chinning Dar
Parallel Bar
2. Wheel
Window Panel/Wall
Tic Tack Toe
1 point/foot of height
I point/linear foot
2 points/linear foot
2 points each
2 pointS each
5 points
-Mt
ma
' 74v .tia24 Yi;.! t[t: &I Z70 V9--i-rf;a1 Z-2:699 .N99i I sn:0 '7,570 Tzei.)viaxl 1724-7 WN1'11)Hkn (2-2f-779:I \, : Earl F. Andersen & Associates, Inc. 9808 James Circle Bloomington, Mn. APPROvID By • (:,1"7-f
PARK NAME: WiltChl, PlriC
COMPANY NAME: Vari F Pmetorv,-1-q1.0nri.crnix <*tht.-hlrw
EVALUATION CRITERIA:
SLIDES
?WIDSpiral
Z' Straight
Tube
Wave
Double
Roller
SWINGS
10 points/foot of height
5 points/foot of height
8 points/foot of height
7 points/foot of height
6 points/foot of height
8 points/foot of height
24Belt (each)3e&
1 point/foot of height
Tire
3 points/foot of height
Exerglide
5 points/foot of height
DECKS 3y3 .liSs4= 1 point/s.f. x 1/2 point/foot of height
NETS - CARGO 1 point/s.f. x 1/2 point/foot of h
e
i
g
h
t
HORIZONTAL CONNECTORS
3i) Tube/Tunnel lei '
5 points/linear foot
Clatter Bridge
5 points/linear foot
Ramp
2 points/linear foot
Horizontal Ladder
1 point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot of
height
Rings
1 point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot of
height
Bar with Handles
1 point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot of
height
Trolley Ride
2 points/foot of lenght x 1/2 point/foot
of height
CLIMB ERS
Arch
42- Ribbonslide 12'
3 Steps
1, Vertical Ladder
Corkscrew
Hoop Tunnel
Chain Ladder
BALANCE
Balance Beam
Log Roll
Chain Walk
OTHER
2 points/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot
of height
1 point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot of
height
1 point/step
1 point/foot
3 points/foot of height
3 points/foot of height
2 points/foot of height
1 point/linear foot
5 points/linear foot
2 points/linear foot
Firemans Pole
Chinning Bar
Parallel Bar
l2-Window Panel/Wall
Tic Tack be
2 91
1 point/foot of height
1 point/linear foot
2 points/linear foot
2 points each
2 points each
5 points
C'10'17..)Y,r61 •A tJ.21 Ar1.94-4A' 2 1?4‘*-. 1r.3C36 -1,c9,4`4:.*Icktir Fite, Ytor21 VbA .41 1.442 urtz_ *74-0 co-.779 ow 1:9t-?.'r r*ti?;,'rif„;• Earl F. Andersen & Associates, Inc. 9808 James Circle Bloomington, Mn. -9' AP.P.Pv.ID •n 1°— H , 'Ft 9r4 .11P-77 MLUPLA
ertical dJ NOTEs Decks are CYCLONE SLIDEs. 4.x5 of expandell' overall hgt metal vinyl coated Scales ;;,"-l' • NATUREVILLE PLAYSYSTEM • Ivertica 1.0.) "—I ::.----,.......0 LAI 7 n wide slide 5 I _(i) i c a w-1 • ions , I , 4, 1 i!!1 :t-__-==,..-_-_,=== I ..., • Fil---- 4'..--' P ,T1 ------1 ca a- 1 I .,laddes, ,....:! L] U I 1 I enclosure ! I ,„,--- ---- ! 1 ---------1 ! (Swin;- w/2 belts;)' 8 ' hi ladder ) T1 blot arze curved climber ---____-- small cargo he'l 0 BOB KLEIN & ASSOCIATES Park & Playground Equipment 100 Valley Lane 612 - 437-4525 Hastings, Mn. 55033
PARK NAME: WIL.1.41.0
COMPANY NW: 4P-th Accor /i rcvo ROC.
EVALUATION CRITERIA:
SLIDES
r-i0Spiral
Straight
Tube
Wave
IS Double s,
Roller
10 points/foot of height
5 points/foot of height
8 points/foot of height
7 points/foot of height
6 points/foot of height
8 points/foot of height
SWINGS
i4o Belt (each)o' 1 point/foot of height
Tire 3 points/foot of height
Exerglide 5 points/foot of height
160 DECKS 4C:6f/111%1,1,1 point/s.f. x 1/2 point/foot of height
10'5NETS - CARGO/sF 1 point/s.f. x 1/2 point/foot of height
HORIZONTAL CONNECTORS
Tube/Tunne1 4-1
5 points/linear foot
Clatter Bridge
5 points/linear foot
Ramp
2 points/linear foot
Horizontal Ladder
I point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot
o
f
height
Rings
I point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot
o
f
height
Bar with Handles
1 point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot
o
f
height
Trolley Ride
2 points/foot of lenght x 1/2 point/foot of height
CLIMBERS
3° Arch 9
Ribbonslide
3 Steps
1 5 Vertical ladder
Corkscrew
Hoop Tunnel
Chain ladder
BALANCE
Balance Beam
Log Roll
Chain Walk
OTHER
2 points/foot of length x 1/2 point/foo
t
of height
1 point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot o
f
height
1 point/stap
I point/foot
3 points/foot of height
3 points/foot of height
2 points/foot of height
1 point/linear foot
5 points/linear foot
2 points/linear foot
Firemans Pole
Chinning Bar
Parallel Bar
Wheel
1 Window Panel/Wall
Tic Tack Toe
1 point/foot of height
1 point/linear foot
2 points/linear foot
2 points each
2 points each
5 points
Ill 2
PARK NAME: \Akiryt hn hrs Yry-11 I
COMPANY NAME: len\ 4-6 rtai 14-116
EVALUATION CRITERIA:
SLIDES
sr5 Spiral
Straight
Tube
Wave
1:,3 Double
Roller
SWINGS
4VBelt (each)46)
Tire
Exerglide
8€5' DECKS ILiis•F
hiv
NETS - CARGO
10 points/foot of height
5 points/foot of height
8 points/foot of height
7 points/foot of height
6 points/foot of height
8 points/foot of height
1 point/foot of height
3 points/foot of height
5 points/foot of height
1 point/s.f. x 1/2 point/foot of height
1 point/s.f. x 1/2 point/foot of height
HORIZONTAL CONNECTORS
Tube/Tunnel
5 points/linear foot
50Clatter Bridge
5 points/linear foot
Ramp
2 points/linear foot
Horizontal Ladder
1 point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot of
height
Rings
1 point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot of
height
Bar with Handles
1 point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot of
height
Trolley Ride
2 points/foot of lenght x 1/2 pointPoot
of height
CLIMBERS
I4r Arch
Ribbonslide
Steps
S•5 Vertical Ladder
Corkscrew
Hoop Tunnel
Chain Ladder
2 points/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot
of height
1 point/foot of length x 1/2 point/foot of
height
1 point/step
1 point/foot
3 points/foot of height
3 points/foot of height
2 points/foot of height
BALANCE
Balance Beam
Log Roll
Chain Walk
OTHER
1 point/linear foot
5 points/linear foot
2 points/linear foot
Firemans Pole 1 point/foot of height
Chinning Bar 1 point/linear foot
Parallel Bar 2 points/linear foot
Wheel 2 points each
Window Panel/Wall 2 points each
Tic Tack Toe 5 points
10.5 RcL11,-,ci Rap.- CL.rio -
Mar
3) ;
T. S. HOWARD CO., INC.
2169 ENERGY PARK 1/11. • ST. PAUI., NIN 55108
PHONE (612) 6464025
Take Off TO At Date
Poi. Vsl Y11/41 bti fit-4 kloLL PAPk-_
location 6,5-2 S- iu-
Spec. i.h .L.R./ (7/ri VF 'Pug Y-Sroe-LIC-ruke S Archt. --a,fte.Vsfu-co, Oleost
Ph CI 31 41—
Doe
' ! ;
'V, a, Roo4-LADC3o.P.-..
CoRvitt
C...1-ta str
i SUbe. :
P7o Pe_ CL: meb
; ;
S S t.Pecten rr,-- (PARI !
Fut,I_
I
PARK NAME: \hilt 1P1A)
COMPANY NAPIE:
EVALUATION CRITERIA:
SLIDES
ycy Spiral ,°3
Straight
Tube
Wave
oy2,0ouble5S)
Roller
10 points/foot of height
5 points/foot of height
8 points/foot of height
7 points/foot of height
6 points/foot of height
8 points/foot of height
SWINGS
Belt ieach)'
Tire
Exerglide
eS DECKS 4 '4- I ‘'IC
NETS - CARGO
1 point/foot of height
3 points/foot of height
5 points/foot of height
I point/s.f. x 1/2 point/foot o
f
h
e
i
g
h
t
1 point/s.f. x 1/2 point/foot o
f
h
e
i
g
h
t
HORIZONTAL CONNECTORS
Tube/Tunnel
',Clatter Bridge
Ramp
ZoHorizontal Ladder
Rings
Bar with Handles
Trolley Ride
CLIMBERS
14 Arch 4'
Ribbonslide
Steps
epr^y Vertical Ladder
Corkscrew
Hoop Tunnel
Chain Ladder
BALANCE
Balance Beam
Loy Roll
Chain Walk
OTHER
5 points/linear foot
5 points/linear foot
2 points/linear foot
I point/foot of length x 1/2
p
o
i
n
t
/
f
o
o
t
o
f
height
1 point/foot of length x 1/2
p
o
i
n
t
/
f
o
o
t
o
f
height
1 point/foot of length x 1/2
p
o
i
n
t
/
f
o
o
t
o
f
height
2 points/foot of lenght x 1/2
p
o
i
n
t
/
f
o
o
t
of height
2 points/foot of length x 1/2
p
o
i
n
t
/
f
o
o
t
of height
1 point/foot of length x 1/2 p
o
i
n
t
/
f
o
o
t
o
f
height
1 point/step
1 point/foot
3 points/foot of height
3 points/foot of height
2 points/foot of height
1 point/linear foot
5 points/linear foot
2 points/linear foot
Firemans Pole
1 point/foot of height Chinning Bar
I point/linear foot Parallel Bar
2 points/linear foot Wheel 2 points each Window Panel/Wall
2 points each Tic Tack Toe
5 points
ip.S gais,n9 Rope.. a ,,-,t, - 5.1ix + r
o
p
e
.
.
J- G.cD
S4cd
MS
T. S. 110WAIID CO., INC.
2169 EiSk:11CY PARK DR. • ST. PAUL, MN 55108
PRONE (612) 6U1025
Take Off Ti4 At Date 7/2S.--
Prot. W;1..t0w
Location 7 ,10
Spec. )4 ; L/94 vF 'kJ-7 "/"Zre--tiC--"J'eE ArCht• 44 A WN/V ,n./6 (I/COSS
Ph 937 - 2.41-
Due
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RES. C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
A
u
g
u
s
t
1
,
1
9
8
8
A. Playground Equipment Bids - Eden Lake Park, Will
o
w
P
a
r
k
-
and Wyndham Knoll Park
Refer to memo dated July 29, 1988 from Barb Cr
o
s
s
,
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
Architect.
Barb said that the only bid received on Eden La
k
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
/
P
a
r
k
was from Earl F. Anderson because they had ins
t
a
l
l
e
d
t
h
e
first phase of the equipment. This work can be
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
before September 1.
A new grading sheet was used to evaluate bids fo
r
W
y
n
d
h
a
m
Knoll and Willow Park. T.S. Howard received th
e
h
i
g
h
e
s
t
score. However, the neighborhood groups had a
c
h
a
n
c
e
to choose the playstructure they would like to ha
v
e
a
n
d
they chose Landscape Structure equipment. Due
t
o
t
h
e
high scoring on the evaluation sheet, staff recom
m
e
n
d
s
a
c
c
e
p
t
i
n
g
the bid from T.S. Howard.
Richard asked what the residents will say when i
t
i
s
n
o
t
the playstructure they chose. Lambert said he fe
e
l
s
t
h
e
people at Willow Park will not be as concerned, b
u
t
t
h
e
Wyndham Knolls group will probably notice the dif
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
.
Baker suggested that staff send this group a lette
r
e
x
p
l
a
i
n
i
n
g
the bidding process and why the other playstruct
u
r
e
w
a
s
chosen.
Joyer said she feels it is a shame to spend this m
u
c
h
m
o
n
e
y
on a playstructure when it is not the one requ
e
s
t
e
d
b
y
the residents. Richard agreed.
Joyer added that perhaps the evaluation sheet s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
changed to take other items under consideration.
MOTION: Joyer moved to approve the bid from Earl J.
A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
for Eden Lake School/Park and from T.S. Howard
f
o
r
W
y
n
d
h
a
m
Knoll Park and Willow Park adding a 14" to 18"
h
i
g
h
p
l
a
t
f
o
r
m
or steps to the playstructure. Baker seconded t
h
e
m
o
t
i
o
n
.
On call for discussion, Richard asked the heigh
t
o
f
t
h
e
platforms on the playstructure at Eden Valley P
a
r
k
.
C
r
o
s
s
said it is 14" high. Richard felt this would be an ideal
height for small children.
The motion passed 6-0.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
DATE: June 21, 1988
SUBJECT: Request From Eden Prairie Figure Skating Club
Attached is a letter of a June 15, 1988 letter from Kathy Lindberg, President
of the Eden Prairie Figure Skating Club, requesting authorization to hang the
Eden Prairie Figure Skating Club banner in the lobby of the Community Center.
This is a red banner with black and white lettering approximately 2 1/2' high
by 4' wide.
In the past the City has not allowed any of the local athletic associations or
clubs to hang banners in the lobby other than during a tournament or during a
registration period.
The lobby has limited wall space and staff believe that if we allow one group
to hang a banner, we must also make space available for all other youth
groups. Staff is of the opinion that these types of banners would detract
from the appearance of the lobby and would recommend denying such requests.
Staff receives many requests from organizations to hang their various banners
and advertisements on walls within the lobby of the Community Center. Staff
would like some direction as to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
Commission and City Council opinion on whether or not these requests should be
honored on an unlimited basis or if there should be some limitations as to
size of banners, location of banners, length of time banners can be displayed
and what types of organizations will be allowed to display banners at all.
BL:mdd
APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOUR
C
E
S
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
Monday, July 18, 1988
COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT:
7:30 p.m., City Hall
7600 Executive Drive
Pat Breitenstein, chairperson;
Bud Baker, Moe Cook, Karon Joyer,
Pat Richard
COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: Brian Mikkelson, Charles Shaw
COMMISSION STAFF: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks,
Recreation and Natural Resources,
Barb Cross, Landscape Architect,
Lyndell Frey, Recreation Supervisor,
Laurie Helling, Athletic Coordinator
I. ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by chairperso
n
,
Pat Breitenstein.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Cook moved to approve the agenda as printed. Baker
seconded the motion and it passed 4-0.
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JUNE 20, 1988
MOTION: Cook moved to approve the minutes as printed. Richard
seconded the motion and it passed 3-0. Joyer abstained.
IV. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request from Eden Prairie Figure Skating Club
Refer to memo dated June 21, 1988 from Bob Lambert, Dire
c
t
o
r
of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources.
The Eden Prairie Figure Skating Club has requested authori
z
a
t
i
o
n
to hang their banner in the lobby of the Community Center
.
Lambert said they have allowed various groups to hang
their banners while an event is going on or during registr
a
t
i
o
n
,
but not at other times.
Baker said he agrees that it is not appropriate to hang
banners in the lobby, but feels the hockey arena or pool
area would be acceptable, especially if the group has won
a state title.
Richard said he thinks there should be some uniformity
on where banners can be hung.
Joyer said she feels that it would be good for the participa
n
t
s
to see some outward recognition of their group.
APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES CO
M
M
.
J
u
l
y
1
8
,
1
9
8
8
-2-
Cook agreed that a banner is an important sign of the pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
'
s
efforts, but he is against having banners displayed in th
e
lobby.
MOTION: Baker moved to recommend that banners be allowed
only inside the ice arena or pool areas to recognize achiev
e
m
e
n
t
s
made by home teams and not allowed in the lobby of the
Communit) Center. Cook seconded the motion and it pass
e
d
4-0.
V. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
A. Fairfield by Tandem Corporation
Refer to memo dated July 12, 1988 from Barb Cross, Lands
c
a
p
e
Architect and staff reports dated May 6 and June 24, 1988
.
Tom Boise, President of Centex Homes, was present at the
meeting to review the development. The site is located
on 148 acres west of County Road 4, south of Highway 5
and north of County Road 1, east of the railroad tracks.
367 single family lots are proposed with three different hou
s
i
n
g
styles. Phases 2 thru 6 of this project are on hold at
this time pending the completion of the Southwest Eden
Prairie Phasing Plan for roads and utilities.
Barb Cross said that tree loss will be approximately 33%
or 799 caliper inches. Average tree loss for other resident
i
a
l
projects has been 27% and this project is close to the avera
g
e
.
Tree inventory submitted to the City was estimated at 36%;
however, the Planning staff estimates tree loss to be closer
to 55% and has asked the developer to minimize tree loss
by providing larger and wider lots and realigning several
sections or roadway. The pedestrian system which is recom
m
e
n
d
e
d
is a 5' sidewalk and 8' bituminous trail along either side
of both the north/south and east/west collector streets wi
t
h
i
n
the development. In addition, staff recommends an outlot
between houses providing access to the school be 40' wid
e
.
The outlot with an 8' trail leaves 16' on either side for
berming. Also, staff recommends that the developer dedic
a
t
e
the 100 year floodplain to the City so the area can be pr
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
.
Baker asked if the road connection will be a joint effort
between the school and the City. Barb said this is schoo
l
property, not City property.
Cook asked about the pond shown on the site. Barb said
this looks larger on the map than it actually is, but it
is recommended that in order to provide access along the
north side of the pond to the future neighborhood park,
an outlot 20' wide above the high water mark should be
dedicated to the City.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
FROM: Tom Eastman, Supervisor of Operations
DATE: August 3, 1985
SUBJECT: Banners in Community Center
Recently a request was made by the Eden Prairie Figure Skating Club to post a
banner in the lobby. The city policy in the past has been to minimize banners
and advertising on Community Center walls.
Staff continues to receive compliments on how nice the logos look and with the
present updating going on Uxne walls are going to look new again. It has been
staff's experience that any time banners and/or advertising is allowed in a
facility, it takes away from the appearance.
Realizing it is advantageous to have banners promoting the facilities users,
such as the swim team, figure skating club, hockey association, etc., staff
recommends the following:
Nb permanent banners or signs be allowed in the Community Center lobby.
Permanent banners of a flag type material will be allowed by local
and Eden Prairie groups that regularly rent time at the Community
Center for practices and/or games. Those groups banners would be hung
in the area of the facility pertaining to its use.
Example; Hockey Association of Eden Prairie - ice arena
The banners be hung from the rafters in an area so as not to obstruct
the spectators view of the event, scoreboard, and painted wall logos.
Banner sizes would all be a uniform 2 1/2 feet x 5 feet with letters
no larger than 6 inches. The banner shall consist of no more than
the organizations name.
Temporary banners will be allowed during a particular users time period
(when that user is renting the facility). Many hockey teams like to
hang banners promoting individual teams during hockey games. Perhaps
permaneut hooks could be installed so that those banners could be easily
put up and taken down.
Temporary banners should not be allowed to remain up after that user has
completed its rented time.
Interior aesthetics has always been a concern at the Community Center.
Consideration should be given to this when recommending banners at the Community
Center.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation
July 27, 1988
Flying Cloud Airport Plan to the Year 2010
& Natural ResourceCTe___
Attached is a map depicting the proposed expansion areas of Flying
C
l
o
u
d
Airport in order to meet demand to the year 2010. This map is
o
n
e
s
m
a
l
l
portion of a relatively detailed master plan that is being review
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
Metropolitan Airports Commission. The public hearing is not expec
t
e
d
u
n
t
i
l
October or November of 1988.
Once all of the draft chapters are corrected and compiled
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
Comprehensive Airport Development Plan, copies will be distribut
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
Council.
There is some good news and some bad news with initial review of the
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
draft. The good news indicates that the Flying Cloud ballfields
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
critical to the ongoing youth athletic program of the City are not
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
for other uses. The bad news is that the plan proposes an extensio
n
t
o
t
h
e
southern most east/west runway, and substantial aircraft hanger devel
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
accommodate substantial increased air traffic and airport use over th
e
n
e
x
t
2
0
year period.
Parks, recreation and natural resources staff some concern regar
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
environmental impact on adjacent residential property of the
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
extension of the runway that would accommodate larger jet aircraft
a
n
d
t
h
e
expansion of additional hangers that would accommodate a significant
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
in the number of aircraft.
As the Metropolitan Airports Commission is reviewing the proposed expa
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
this facility, staff believes it is an appropriate time to address
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
other airport land issues:
1. Flying Cloud Ballfields - At this time the City has a lease agreeme
n
t
w
i
t
h
the Metropolitan Airports Commission regarding use of the property
f
o
r
Flying Cloud Ballfields. This lease can be terminated by either p
a
r
t
y
with a 90 day notice, which requires the City to return the property
t
o
its original condition. These ballfields are the core of the y
o
u
t
h
athletic program for the City and will be vital to the City's yo
u
t
h
athletic program for as long as the City has access to them. It would
b
e
very beneficial to the City if we were able to get a longer t
e
r
m
commitment for the use of this property, in order to justify s
o
m
e
expenditures that would improve the safety of the program and the qual
i
t
y
of the program - ie. turn lanes on County Road 1, paving of the acc
e
s
s
road and parking lots and expansion of the parking lots. The Athle
t
i
c
Associations have also recommended the City consider irrigating tho
s
e
fields.
2. Other Airport Property Uses - The City is presently looking for a permanent location for the dog training facility for the Police Department. The Department requires approximat
e
l
y
1
a
c
r
e
o
f
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
that has access to a parking lot and is in a relati
v
e
l
y
s
e
c
u
r
e
a
r
e
a
.
Staff is also looking for a permanent location
f
o
r
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
g
a
r
d
e
n
s
.
This requires a field area that has relatively
g
o
o
d
s
o
i
l
s
,
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
a
public road and that is relatively level,
Both of these uses are low density uses and might
m
a
k
e
v
e
r
y
g
o
o
d
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
s
for the airport and provide a positive public u
s
e
o
f
s
o
m
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
i
r
p
o
r
t
buffer zone.
At the July 18th meeting of the Parks, Recreati
o
n
a
n
d
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Commission, representatives of the Athletic Asso
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
to ask the Metropolitan Airports Commission if it
w
o
u
l
d
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
s
s
i
s
t
i
n
g
i
n
the cost for making some improvements to the
F
l
y
i
n
g
C
l
o
u
d
B
a
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
s
.
T
h
e
y
suggested requesting the Metropolitan Airpor
t
s
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
h
e
l
p
f
u
n
d
a
n
irrigation system for the ballfields. Staff indic
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
i
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
w
o
u
l
d
be forwarded to the City Council to determi
n
e
i
f
t
h
i
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
included in any other recommendations on review of
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
f
o
r
Airport Expansion.
Staff would recommend the City submit these req
u
e
s
t
s
f
o
r
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
b
y
t
h
e
Metropolitan Airports Commission and the comme
n
t
s
b
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
r
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
the Metropolitan Airports Commission Master Plan
f
o
r
F
l
y
i
n
g
C
l
o
u
d
A
i
r
p
o
r
t
.
BL:mdd
e.
ADD 39 ACRES OF STORAGE AREA.
(HOUSING FOR 237 ADDITIONAL AIRCRAFT)
CLTY/DEVELOPMENT r0 MEET UNCONSTRAINED DEMAND
DIFFERENT ALTERNATIVES WILL BE DEVELOPED AND
ANALYZED TO FIND THE BEST WAY TO raLY OR PARTIALLY
MEET (AC GENERAL DEVELOPMENT DEPICATED ABOVE
DPMENT TO MEET UNCONSTRAINED DEMAND - 2010
FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT
g-fr 711' tle"7:.; &Leitali,( m
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RES. COMMISSION August 1
,
1
9
8
8
B. Flying Cloud Airport Plan 2010
Refer to memo dated July 27, 1988 from Bob Lambert, Director
of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources.
Staff recommends that the City get a longer term commitment
on the lease of Flying Cloud Bal!fields which would justify
some improvements in the area including turn lanes on County
Road 1, expanding and paving the parking lots and irrigating
the fields. Also, the City is looking for a permanent location
for the dog training facility for the Police Department and
a permanent location for community gardens.
Cook asked where hangar development is proposed in relation
to the ballfields. Lambert showed its location adding that
such development would require land currently used for
ballfields.
MOTION: Mikkelson moved to recommend that a letter be
drafted by the Council and sent to the Metropolitan Airports
Commission regarding Flying Cloud Bal!fields and other proposed
property uses. Cook seconded the motion and it passed
6-0.
ITS
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation &
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
June 29, 1988
Scenic Easement Review Process and Surfac
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
f
o
r
Mitchell Lake
Attached is a memo staff proposed to send to
t
h
e
P
a
r
k
s
,
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
Resources Commission and the Planning Commi
s
s
i
o
n
f
o
r
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
c
e
n
i
c
easement policies within the City of Eden Pr
a
i
r
i
e
.
S
t
a
f
f
i
s
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
after the review of the general City policy
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
s
c
e
n
i
c
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
t
h
e
City Council call for a special meeting with
M
i
t
c
h
e
l
l
L
a
k
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
s
t
o
discuss the future of shoreland development
o
n
M
i
t
c
h
e
l
l
L
a
k
e
.
Councilman Anderson has also suggested the
C
i
t
y
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
t
h
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
surface management ordinance at the same t
i
m
e
;
a
l
t
h
o
u
g
h
,
t
h
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
surface management ordinance might be dis
c
u
s
s
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
s
during this meeting, staff would not recomm
e
n
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
a
t
t
e
m
p
t
t
o
determine a surface management ordinance
a
t
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
t
i
m
e
,
a
s
t
h
e
s
e
a
r
e
t
w
o
separate issues, and both issues ar
e
v
e
r
y
l
i
k
e
l
y
t
o
b
e
e
x
t
r
e
m
e
l
y
Ar controversial.
City staff agrees with Mr. Anderson that if
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
l
l
o
w
s
m
o
r
e
d
o
c
k
s
t
o
b
e
constructed on Mitchell Lake through thi
s
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
,
t
h
e
r
e
w
i
l
l
b
e
m
o
r
e
a
n
d
more property owners that will oppose any
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
.
S
t
a
f
f
also recognizes that once a public access i
s
o
p
e
n
e
d
o
n
M
i
t
c
h
e
l
l
L
a
k
e
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
a
surface management ordinance, the lake wou
l
d
e
x
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
s
w
e
now have at Riley Lake with overcrowded co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
t
o
o
m
a
n
y
h
i
g
h
p
o
w
e
r
e
d
boats. This lake is much more suited to ca
n
o
e
s
a
n
d
f
i
s
h
i
n
g
b
o
a
t
s
d
u
e
t
o
t
h
e
shallow bays and the irregular shoreline.
At the meeting with Mitchell Lake Homeowne
r
s
,
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
m
i
g
h
t
w
i
s
h
t
o
appoint a citizens committee to work with s
t
a
f
f
o
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
a
d
r
a
f
t
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
management ordinance for Mitchell Lake.
BL:mdd
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Planning Commission
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Reso
u
r
c
e
s
June 29, 1988
Review of Scenic Easement Policy
In June of 1988, the City Council received a request fro
m
E
a
r
l
I
n
g
r
a
m
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
him to maintain a lawn area, sand beach, and dock at h
i
s
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
a
t
1
7
0
6
4
Weston Bay. Mr. Ingram had already removed the natural v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
h
i
s
house and the lakeshore in the process of removing tree
s
t
h
a
t
h
a
d
d
i
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
the lakeshore due to the previous high water conditions.
As a part of the Weston Bay Subdivision, a 75 wide scen
i
c
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
,
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
d
from the shoreline was filed on all lots within West
o
n
B
a
y
.
T
h
i
s
s
c
e
n
i
c
easement required a permit to remove any live vegetati
o
n
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
s
c
e
n
i
c
easement, and prohibited docks or sand beaches. The
s
c
e
n
i
c
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
w
a
s
recommended by City staff and approved by the Commissi
o
n
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
because this condition was consistent with a scenic ea
s
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
a
t
h
a
d
b
e
e
n
approved on all the previously developed eastern shoreli
n
e
o
f
M
i
t
c
h
e
l
l
L
a
k
e
.
Ar The major difference, however, was that the Timber Lake
s
S
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
c
e
n
i
c
easement was controlled by the Timber Lakes Homeowner's A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
;
w
h
e
r
e
a
s
,
the Weston Bay Subdivision scenic easement was controlled
b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
E
d
e
n
Prairie.
Earlier this year the Timber Lakes Homeowner's Associat
i
o
n
b
e
c
a
m
e
a
w
a
r
e
o
f
several violations of the scenic easement. When the Hom
e
o
w
n
e
r
'
s
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
requested the property owner to restore the propert
y
,
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
indicated that he would pursue the matter in cou
r
t
.
The Homeowner's Association decided not to enforce the scenic easeme
n
t
.
Since that time, there have been several additional docks installed
a
n
d
s
o
m
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
clearing within the scenic easement in the Timber Lakes
S
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
.
Much of the tree removal was initiated when the la
k
e
b
e
g
a
n
r
e
c
e
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
property owners began removing dead trees along the sho
r
e
l
i
n
e
.
O
n
c
e
t
h
e
t
r
e
e
s
were cut down, in many cases, heavy equipment was br
o
u
g
h
t
i
n
t
o
r
e
m
o
v
e
t
h
e
stumps. Several individuals then had sand hauled in t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
b
e
a
c
h
w
h
e
r
e
the dead trees had previously been standing.
At the June 21st meeting, the City Council reviewed t
h
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
f
o
r
Earl Ingram and a June 15th memo suggesting the Counci
l
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
r
e
a
s
s
e
s
s
i
n
g
the desire for a scenic easement around the entire lakes
h
o
r
e
a
t
M
i
t
c
h
e
l
l
L
a
k
e
.
The memo pointed out that the north shore has been dev
e
l
o
p
e
d
f
o
r
m
a
n
y
y
e
a
r
s
with large lots that have full use of the lakeshore and
t
h
a
t
u
n
l
e
s
s
t
h
e
T
i
m
b
e
r
Lakes Homeowner's Association changes their mind and
d
e
c
i
d
e
s
t
o
p
u
r
s
u
e
t
h
e
enforcement of the scenic easement, it may not make
s
e
n
s
e
t
o
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
require a full scenic easement on additional shoreline a
r
o
u
n
d
M
i
t
c
h
e
l
l
L
a
k
e
.
The City Council was very concerned about the precedent that
m
a
y
b
e
s
e
t
b
y
simply eliminating a scenic easement as soon as someone decides t
o
v
i
o
l
a
t
e
t
h
e
scenic easement. The Council requested staff to review the sce
n
i
c
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
policy with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commi
s
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
t
h
e
Planning Commission prior to taking any action with chang
e
s
t
o
s
c
e
n
i
c
easements on Mitchell Lake.
RECOMMENDATIONS ON SCENIC EASEMENTS
The purpose of a scenic easement is to insure preservation of un
i
q
u
e
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
features. Scenic easements are most generally used along steep wo
o
d
e
d
s
l
o
p
e
s
,
creek valleys, bluffs, marshlands, or lakeshores. In the past
,
s
t
a
f
f
h
a
v
e
delineated areas within subdivisions where a scenic easement li
n
e
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
drawn; however, there have been no restrictions on how close a ho
u
s
e
c
o
u
l
d
b
e
constructed to the scenic easement line. In some cases, as with M
r
.
I
n
g
r
a
m
i
n
Weston Bay, the house was placed within 5 of the scenic easeme
n
t
l
i
n
e
.
I
n
many other cases, especially along Purgatory Creek, homes are
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
within 5-10' of a scenic easement line and sooner or later an indiv
i
d
u
a
l
w
a
n
t
s
to build a deck into the scenic easement or a swimming pool or si
m
p
l
y
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
a small backyard. Staff would recommend a minimum of a 30' setback from a
scenic easement line. If homes are allowed to build right up to scenic
easements, the City will be constantly faced with requests to intru
d
e
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
scenic easement line and many of the requests might have to be c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
a
reasonable use of an individual's property. The number of request
s
t
o
e
x
t
e
n
d
into the scenic easement and the unauthorized violations
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
significantly reduced, if not eliminated.
When individual property owners purchase an expensive lot on a
l
a
k
e
,
t
h
e
y
will continue to push to have access to the lake through the us
e
o
f
d
o
c
k
s
a
n
d
to maintain some manicured access to the lakeshore. Scenic eas
e
m
e
n
t
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
work satisfactorily when properties are abutting natural creek
v
a
l
l
e
y
s
,
w
h
e
n
the incentive of the property owner is to preserve the natural
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
gives value to the property; however, the majority of lakesh
o
r
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
owners would prefer to develop their lakeshore lot all th
e
w
a
y
t
o
t
h
e
lakeshore, and to have use of the lake.
Staff would recommend that in the future, if the City wishes
t
o
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
lakeshore in its natural condition, the City either negot
i
a
t
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
acquisition of a stripe of land along the lakeshore for City own
e
r
s
h
i
p
,
r
a
t
h
e
r
than relying on scenic easements; or strictly adhere to t
h
e
S
h
o
r
e
l
a
n
d
Management Ordinance regarding setbacks and lot widths. The m
o
s
t
a
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
method for preserving wooded lakeshore is to adhere to t
h
e
S
h
o
r
e
l
a
n
d
Management Ordinance, as the majority of lakeshore lots are de
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
w
i
t
h
large expensive homes, it does not make since to give lot widt
h
o
r
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
variances if the goal is to preserve the wooded character of the l
a
k
e
s
h
o
r
e
.
MITCHELL LAKE SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT
Staff would recommend the City Council request a meeting of the
T
i
m
b
e
r
L
a
k
e
s
Homeowner's Association to determine their intent of (or lack o
f
)
e
n
f
o
r
c
i
n
g
the scenic easement along the lakeshore. The City should then de
c
i
d
e
t
o
w
h
a
t
extent shoreland development will be regulated around the remaini
n
g
s
h
o
r
e
l
i
n
e
of Mitchell Lake, and what restrictins are reasonable within Westo
n
B
a
y
.
If the Homeowner's Association would decide to en
f
o
r
c
e
t
h
e
s
c
e
n
i
c
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
,
the City could continue with the previously pla
n
n
e
d
p
o
l
i
c
y
o
f
a
7
5
'
w
i
d
e
scenic easement around the entire shoreline.
If the Homeowner's Association decides not to enforc
e
t
h
e
s
c
e
n
i
c
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
,
t
h
e
City should determine to enforce the Shoreland Manag
e
m
e
n
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
a
r
o
u
n
d
t
h
e
remaining portion of the lake without any variance
s
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
t
h
e
wooded character of the Mitchell Lake shoreline.
The Weston Bay Subdivision was granted shoreland v
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
s
m
a
i
n
l
y
d
u
e
t
o
t
h
e
commitment of the scenic easement. Staff would rec
o
m
m
e
n
d
t
h
a
t
e
v
e
n
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
Is not to be a scenic easement around the remaining
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
M
i
t
c
h
e
l
l
L
a
k
e
,
the scenic easement in Weston Bay remain in pl
a
c
e
a
n
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
s
t
a
f
f
review each lakeshore parcel within Weston Bay pr
i
o
r
t
o
a
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
n
y
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
plans. All grading plans would require preser
v
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
t
l
e
a
s
t
4
0
%
t
h
e
scenic easement in its natural condition, an
d
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
o
f
a
n
y
vegetation above 4' in diameter within the s
c
e
n
i
c
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
maintain the natural character of the wooded shore
l
i
n
e
.
Staff would further recommend that no sodded law
n
s
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
w
i
t
h
i
n
1
0
'
o
f
the lakeshore in order to reduce the amount of f
e
r
t
i
l
i
z
e
r
r
u
n
n
i
n
g
d
i
r
e
c
t
l
y
into the water. Under these conditions, staff wou
l
d
a
l
s
o
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
o
f
the dock restriction, but that all docks conform
t
o
t
h
e
S
h
o
r
e
l
a
n
d
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Ordinance regarding location, size, etc.
The City staff does not believe this particular s
i
t
u
a
t
i
o
n
s
e
t
s
a
n
y
p
r
e
c
e
d
e
n
t
for eliminating or changing any of the other scen
i
c
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
of Eden Prairie. There are so many altered condi
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
M
i
t
c
h
e
l
l
L
a
k
e
t
h
a
t
this one scenic easement does warrant reconsider
a
t
i
o
n
;
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
a
l
l
o
f
t
h
e
other scenic easements along creek valleys, etc ar
e
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
Eden Prairie rather than any private Homeowner's
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
t
h
a
t
m
a
y
d
e
c
i
d
e
not to enforce the scenic easement.
Staff would recommend that the Parks, Recreati
o
n
a
n
d
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Commission review this analysis of our scenic ea
s
e
m
e
n
t
p
o
l
i
c
y
a
n
d
f
o
r
w
a
r
d
recommendations to the Planning Commission. The
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
w
o
u
l
d
then forward recommendations to the City Council
f
o
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
t
h
e
s
c
e
n
i
c
easement policy. Staff would then recommend th
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
c
a
l
l
f
o
r
a
meeting of the Timber Creek Homeowner's Associ
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
t
h
e
W
e
s
t
o
n
B
a
y
Homeowner's Association, as well all other property
o
w
n
e
r
s
o
n
M
i
t
c
h
e
l
l
L
a
k
e
t
o
discuss the future of shoreland development on Mitch
e
l
l
L
a
k
e
.
BL:mdd
rri9
APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. July 18, 1988
-4-
Cook referred to construction costs and asked why there
is a difference in costs on certain items, for instance the
fountain.. Lambert said the reason for the difference is
the different type of soil on each site.
MOTION: Richard moved to recognize that although Site A
is the preferred site, staff should negotiate on both sites
to see what the actual costs would be. Baker seconded
the motion and it passed 4-0.
C. Scenic Easement Policy Review
Refer to memo dated June 29, 1988 from Bob Lambert, Director
of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources.
Lambert said that in the 1970's, the developer of Timber
Lakes Subdivision (on the east side of Mitchell Lake) agreed
that a scenic easement be filed which would prohibit removing
live vegetation within the scenic easement and prohibit docks
and sand beaches. This scenic easement has been violated
several times and the homeowner's association has decided
not to pursue the matter in court. Lambert recommends
that a special meeting be held with the homeowner's association
and residents before deciding how shoreland development
should be regulated and what restrictions are reasonable.
Baker asked what legal action the City can take if, for
instance, someone builds a deck over the scenic easement.
Lambert said the City can require that the deck be removed.
Baker asked if the City allows homeowner's associations to
write scenic easements with the homowners. Lambert said
it is not a requirement.
Joyer said she is concerned that scenic easements are placed
on certain areas to preserve them and people choose to
ignore them knowing that there will be no legal recourse.
Cook said he doesn't understand why there has to be a
policy regulating an existing policy on scenic easements.
Richard asked if this easement will refer to lakeshore property
only. Lambert said he is not recommending scenic easements
to preserve lakeshore.
MOTION: Baker moved to recommend that the City Council
review the scenic easement policy and meet with the Timber
Lakes Homeowners Association, Weston Bay Homeowner's Associatio
and property owners on Mitchell Lake to discuss the future
of shoreland development on Mitchell Lake. Richard seconded
the motion and it passed 4-0.
11 0
MEMORANDUM
TO: Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natur
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
DATE: June 29, 1988
SUBJECT: Recommendations on Use of Parks and Athl
e
t
i
c
F
i
e
l
d
s
Attached for your review is a June 9th report from John Hopco, Turf Grass
Consultant, on the current condition and reco
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
p
a
r
k
s
a
n
d
athletic fields. City staff requested this rep
o
r
t
d
u
e
t
o
e
v
e
r
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
concern on the deteriorating conditions of the par
k
s
a
n
d
a
t
h
l
e
t
i
c
f
i
e
l
d
s
.
In late 1986 and early 1987, the Park Bond Refere
n
d
u
m
S
t
u
d
y
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
w
a
r
n
e
d
that the City needed additional athletic field
s
t
o
k
e
e
p
u
p
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
e
v
e
r
increasing demand of our growing community. Th
e
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
a
t
committee for a 7.9 million dollar referendu
m
,
t
h
a
t
w
o
u
l
d
h
a
v
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
additional youth and adult facilities, were revi
e
w
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
P
a
r
k
s
,
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
and Natural Resources Commission and the City
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
a
n
d
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
f
o
r
a
referendum in April of 1987. This referendum fell
4
2
v
o
t
e
s
s
h
o
r
t
o
f
p
a
s
s
i
n
g
and the stage was set for the City to face some
c
r
i
t
i
c
a
l
p
a
r
k
u
s
e
i
s
s
u
e
s
.
Other than the rainfall that occurred during th
e
w
e
e
k
o
f
J
u
l
y
2
4
,
1
9
8
7
,
t
h
e
City experienced drought conditions throughou
t
1
9
8
7
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
d
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
a
s
continued through 1988. These drought conditions
a
l
o
n
g
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
e
v
e
r
g
r
o
w
i
n
g
use of neighborhood parks for organized athle
t
i
c
u
s
e
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
demand on athletic fields at Round Lake Park a
n
d
F
l
y
i
n
g
C
l
o
u
d
F
i
e
l
d
s
h
a
v
e
caused turf conditions in all of those areas to
r
e
a
c
h
a
c
r
i
t
i
c
a
l
s
t
a
g
e
.
Mr. Hopco has indicated that fields without irr
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
o
u
l
d
n
o
t
h
a
v
e
m
o
r
e
than 35-40 games per year played on them. We h
a
v
e
m
a
n
y
u
n
i
r
r
i
g
a
t
e
d
f
i
e
l
d
s
that are host to over 250 games or practices pe
r
y
e
a
r
.
M
a
n
y
o
f
o
u
r
a
t
h
l
e
t
i
c
fields will be no more than dirt playing are
a
s
i
n
1
9
8
9
u
n
l
e
s
s
t
h
e
y
a
r
e
reseeded and fertilized in August of this year a
n
d
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
f
o
r
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
u
s
e
in 1989. Furthermore, without rain in late July
o
r
e
a
r
l
y
A
u
g
u
s
t
,
t
h
e
f
i
e
l
d
s
will not be able to be reseeded as the ground has
b
e
e
n
c
o
m
p
a
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
p
o
i
n
t
where aerating and reseeding is impossible withou
t
r
a
i
n
o
r
i
r
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
o
m
e
sort. Limiting the use of these fields will be e
x
t
r
e
m
e
l
y
d
i
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
w
i
t
h
e
v
e
r
increasing programs.
Three years ago when the lights were installed at
t
h
e
t
w
o
s
o
f
t
b
a
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
s
a
t
Round Lake Park, the City allowed the Youth Footb
a
l
l
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
u
s
e
t
h
o
s
e
lighted fields for evening practice. The City
h
o
p
e
d
t
h
i
s
w
o
u
l
d
o
n
l
y
b
e
a
temporary condition as we recognize that use wou
l
d
b
e
e
x
t
r
e
m
e
l
y
h
a
r
d
o
n
t
h
e
fields. Fields number 2 and 3 are to the poin
t
o
f
b
e
i
n
g
i
n
a
d
a
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
playing condition at this time due to the overuse
o
c
c
u
r
r
i
n
g
o
v
e
r
t
h
e
l
a
s
t
t
w
o
years. If football were allowed on those fields
t
h
i
s
y
e
a
r
w
e
c
o
u
l
d
w
r
i
t
e
o
f
f
the use of those fields in 1989.
Franlo Park was developed three years ago with on
e
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
b
a
s
e
b
a
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
,
one softball field and two soccer fields.
This neighborhood park/athletic
field has been relatively unusable since development due to the lack of
rainfall and sandy conditions of the soil. This park will remain relatively
unusable until it is fully irrigated.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The City staff recommend the following action be taken in order to eliminate
the continued deterioration of the park system and to insure maintaining safe,
playable conditions on all fields scheduled for organized play:
1. Field Repair
A. The majority of the neighborhood parks that are experiencing organized
athletic play have been seeded with a bluegrass and perennial rye
grass mixture that is typical for neighborhood parks. The ballfield
areas within these parks should be overseeded with a grass seed
mixture for athletic fields that would hold up better under the type
of use those parks are experiencing; therefore, the following parks
should be overseeded and fertilized in fall of 1988 and refertilized
again in the spring of 1989:
1. Red Rock Park
2. Hidden Ponds Park
3. Eden Valley Park
4. Forest Hills School/PArk
5. Prairie View School/Park
6. Nesbitt Preserve Park
7. Eden Lake School/Park
8. Franlo Park
9. Homeward Hills Park
B. Irrigation should be installed at Franlo Park in 1988, if at all
possible with the park overseeded in 1989 and with no use scheduled
for 1989.
C. Neighborhood parks should be limited to scheduling 4 days per week for
all adult games.
D. The Park Maintenance Department should review which baseball and
softball fields need major repair work such as recutting and resodding
the edge of the infield, overseeding, and other major repair work, and
notify the Athletic Coordinator to not allow fall league use of those
fields.
E. City maintenance staff should review various soccer/football fields
and determine which fields need overseeding this fall and all fields
scheduled for fall overseeding should not be scheduled for fall league
play.
F. The City should hire one additional part-time summer employee that is
assigned to softball/baseball field repair from April 15-August 30th.
G. The City should budget for overseeding needs on an annual basis and be
able to fertilize all ballfields two times a year.
2. Scheduling
A. The youth football program should be scheduled at Flying Cloud Fields
and fields 2 and 3 at Round Lake Park should not be scheduled for any
fall softball leagues, but should be aerated, overseeded and
fertilized.
B. All softball and baseball fields should be scheduled for recutting the
edge of infields every other year. This should be done in the early
fall and fields should not be scheduled for fall use during that year.
093
Eden Prairie Parks Dept.
Juno 9, 1988 Eden Prairie Schools
Dear Gentlemen,
The following report summarizes the current status of the
parks and athletic fields used by both the '§ohools and recrea-
tional users within the community of Eden Prairie. This report
is written vbi thout knowledge as to the amount of 'funds• available
for construction or maintenance. I an making recommendations based solely on what would improve the condition of your turf
areas as well as increase playability.
After examining the different parks and fields, I have de-cided to break them down into two categories; Generl Neighbor-
hood Parks and Intensively used Athel etic Fields. The maintenance
and purpose for the two will vary greatly, thus the separation
from here on.
The neighborhood parks looked quite good, considering the
lack of rainfall and the lack of irrigation on these sites. The
purpose of these areas point more towards general use by the
surrounding area as apposed to organized athletic activities 'day
in and day out.
. Maintenance practices that I would strive for at these com-
plexes will be less intense. The following program could be used
as a guide to strive for if labor, money etc. are available.
Fertilization on these sites would be twice a year applying
1 pound of nitrogen and potassium per 1,000 sq. ft. per applicatio
n
.
Timing of the application would be around May -15 to June 1 and August 25 to September 10. These fertilizations would pay far
greater dividends if aerification could be combined with each ,
application. The soil. you have on most sites is extremely hard.
Aerification is the only form of cultivation we can use short of
working up areas and starting over. It should occure when enough
moisture is present in the soil to insure good penetration or else
it is a waste of time.
Weed control will be best achieved if an application of a ,
good broadleaf herbicide is applied in late summer or early fall.
The key thing to remember when spraying weeds is that the weeds
should be actively growing. If we suffer from a dry period such
as the one we currently suffer from, a herbicide treatment will
have little effect and actually caase harm. Vie need moisture to
trancelocate the herbicide threw the plant 24 — 48 hours after
spraying for a more effective kill. One application per year on
these parks should be sufficient as I saw no major problems. I
also recommend sot spraying rather than treating entire areas
unless the entire area is infested. If you run into a severe weed problems, you may have to spray in mid May and a fall appli-
cation.
Should you develope more general purpose parks, I Ivo ulcl
strongly advise using a seed mixture such as Northrup King's
Special Park mixture. It is made up of common grasses that
require less fertilizer and water. The bluegrass and perennial
ryelwass mixture your currently using require much more fertili-
zation than you are applying. Seeding of these parks, especially
when irrigation is not available, should occure in late August or
early September. Spring seedings will be unsuccessful for the
most part and should not be considered.
The playing surfaces at these parks were acceptable for the
most nart. The fields were resonably level. Any holes or uneveness
John and Wes were aware of and the nrocedure to correct them.
Cutting out the turf behind the infields and cleaning up the edge
where the turf meets the infield is best accomnlished in the fall
of the year. The heavy use should be over and the new sod th-t is
put back to give a defined edge will survive better in the fall
when it is cooler.
All of the above m^intenance practices will help improve these
neighborhood :xrks. Seine of these Practicies you already are doing
but need to do more of. My areas of concern lie with the intensively
used fields, which are the last group of fields in question.
AThI,ETIC FIELDS
The high use athletic or nark areas in the City of Eden Prairie
have major problems which need attention to increase playability
and decrease potential liability. I will discuss each of these
along with suggesting alternatives if there is one.
IRRIGATION:
These fields have to have automatic irrigation. It not only
improves turf quality during the year, but it also makes renovation
of these fields much easier when needed. Without irrigation reseed-
ing etc. is almost impossible. Unfortunately, no alternative is
available here. The high use, and quality levels of the user have
increased to the point today where irrigation should be the first
consideration in any new park. Although more parks will help re-
lieve the user pressure for fields., if we don't improve the quality
of the ones you currently have the fields will detonate further.
Use of the nresent sites could increase with improved turf quality
If irrigation was present,
FERTILI Zt TION,
The bluegrass - ryegrass seed mixture developed for athletic
fields that you currently are using requires a minimum of 3 pounds
of nitrogen and potassium per year. They would even do better with
more. On sandy soil sites they require more than three if the use
level is high. Wes informed me that current:a -:nlication levels have been only once a year. This combined with lack of irrigation
causes serious problems. Claming has occured on many of the sites,
the clumps cause footing nroblems, ankle sprains etc.. Also, base-
ball or softballs rolling across this surface bounce eraticallY.
The liability from the clumping could be worse with time. Foot and
leg injuries, along with teeth being knocked out may become much
more of a problem. Increasing fertility, overseeding and irrigation
T) 1 FrP
will correct the situation. If three applications could be applied
the first in late May or early June, the second from August 20 to
September 10 and the third application from late October to early
November.
If irrigation and increased fertility is not a reality, I would
suggest using the Special Park mixture or something close to it for
future parks. This mixture was used initially on the Flying Cloud
fields with good success. The turf on tose fields is quite accep-
table for lack of fertility and irrigation. This turf mixture will
never meet the quality levels of the current mixtures your using
if you could afford to maintain them properly.
AV:117g TION:
This must be done more frequently on your sites, because of
),00r soil and no controlled watering to prevent hardening. Here
again liability becomes a problem when the fields literally become
concrete. Throw in some climping turf -nd you have problems that
need addressing soon. A erification should occure a minimum of twice
o year and combined with fertility if possible.
TIMING of CONSTRUCTION:
I throw this Problem in after examining field 6 at Round Lake.
Seeding the pork before the irrigation was installed has now made
for a maintenance headache. ft. poor turf stand developed because
of a dry fall, and many weeds have taken over. Major ruts resulted
from trying to install the irrigation later. Jjll of this should
be avoided in the future. You save no time by putting the cart
before the horse. Any new field with irrigation planned should be
graded, irrigation installed and operating, and then seeded. Ruts
and uneveness of playing surfaces are a real maintenance prohl em.
If you build new fields in the proper sequence, they will be reody
to play on in within 60 days after seeding with water and Proper
Ma intenance.
I would retill that whole field, level it and reseed. It would
be fully useable and top quality for the spring o f 1909. If a field starts out on a had foot such as this one it takes more time and
money to correct it than if you do it over.
USE a CTOR:
Most of the fields are being used to heavily. Touch
if continued at Round Lake will destroy those outfields even with
water unless you have a time period of no use to renovate. Football
in the fall fol2owed by softball all erring and stLmer will ultimately
ruin the fields. You need to rotate fields, build new fields, or
upgrade present sites.
In summary! All the school fields along with fields 1,2. 7
at the Round Lake complex have very fine fncilities. The school
system has automatic irrigation on almost all fields and the main-
tmnee in regard to fertill7ation etc. is ton notch. They can't
do much more to improve turf quality of the playing surfaces..
Page 3
1106
fitter visiting with all of you from the city
a
n
d
t
h
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
,
I
commend you for the efforts each of you to impr
o
v
e
F. nd upgrade programs and facilities. You should be proud.
I
a
m
e
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
l
y
impressed with the pride John and Wes demons
t
r
a
t
e
d
t
o
m
e
i
n
c
a
r
e
of the different sites. I don't always run int
o
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
s
w
h
o
care as much as they do. However in the case
o
f
t
h
e
h
i
g
h
u
s
e
fields, you have no alternative to upgrading t
h
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s
i
t
e
s
other than dding rutomatie irrigation, mor
e
f
e
r
t
i
l
i
t
y
,
a
e
r
i
f
i
c
"
t
i
o
n
,
and overseeding these areas to improve turf q
u
a
l
i
t
y
a
n
d
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
use. More wrks will definitely be needed in
t
h
e
future but you have an obligation to the present sites now.
Respectfully yours,
4'19-`46'
John R. Ho pko
APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. July 18, 1988
-5-
D. Update on Metropolitan Airport Commission's Master Plan
Process for Flying Cloud Airport
Refer to memo dated June 20, 1988 from Jean Johnson, Zoning
Administrator.
This is an information item only.
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Discussion with Athletic Associations Re: Use of Parks and
Athletic Fields
Refer to memo dated June 29, 1988 from Bob Lambert, Director
of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources.
City staff requested this report due to the concern for
the conditions of parks and athletic fields because of the
drought and overuse. The lighted fields at Round Lake
Park are in the most dangerous condition because they are
also used for evening practice by the youth football association.
Staff has made some recommendations including the cancellation
of fall adult softball games. Adult leagues and some youth
leagues may have to be cut back drastically if the drought
continues into the fall.
It is also recommended that Franlo Park be irrigated in
1988, overseeded in 1989 and not used during 1989.
Lambert added that the condition of most youth fields is
not as bad as the adult fields.
John Parrington of the Eden Prairie Soccer Club said that
when he started eight years ago, there were only 13 high
school players and this year they have 15 teams. He believes
irrigating the fields makes a difference and added that he
feels it is very important that the fields are available for
the youth. He added that if there were a bond referendum
for Miller Park today, it would pass. The soccer club plays
two games a week, one of which is at home and they practice
twice a week.
Ron Groves of the Eden Prairie Baseball Association said
that they have gone from 760 youth to over 1100. He believes
the facilities are good except for the irrigation problem.
He feels Eden Prairie needs more facilities and he is concerned
with the amount of play on neighborhood fields.
Kevin Dahl of the Eden Prairie Soccer Association said he
supported the Miller Park referendum and received 400 signature
from people who supported the bond referendum.
Cook said he feels it is important to save the fields even
if it means limiting usage.
1197
APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. July 18, 1988
-6-
Laurie He'ling added that the Soccer Association used Flying
Cloud Fields exclusively and the Soccer Club uses City fields.
Tom Bierman of the Eden Prairie Soccer Association reviewed
the nights each age group plays soccer, lie added that
he feels staff needs to do some long range planning.
Richard said that he was Co-Chairman of the last bond referendu
and feels the athletic associations need to be more involved
in the process and not be as optimistic as last time that
it would pass.
Farrington added that he feels Miller Park on its own would
have passed.
Baker asked what the cost is of irrigating a field and questionec
whether irrigating Franlo Park alone is enough. Lambert
said although he does not have a quote, he estimates it
would cost between $50,000 and $60,000 for the entire project.
Baker asked why irrigating Flying Cloud Fields was not
mentioned since they are used so much. Lambert said to
keep in mind that the lease of these fields can be terminated
with 90 days notice and there is not even enough money
in the budget to irrigate Franlo Park.
Baker asked if irrigating Franlo Field were approved and
funding was not a problem, would the fields be large enough
for adult leagues. Lambert said the soccer fields are regulation
and would be a great help because of the field shortage.
Lambert added that adult softball does not have as association
and there is not a representative from youth football in
attendance; however, these two groups will be affected the
most by these changes. If Franlo Park was irrigated, its
use restricted and we received significant rainfall, the situation
should be improved. Even if there was to be another bond
referendum, it would be another two years before the fields
would be usable.
Baker asked about the cost to reseed fields. Lambert said
a 50 lb. sack of seed is $150.00 and it requires 75-150
pounds per acre for a total cost of approximately $100-$450
per field for seed alone. Added cost includes fertilizer
and man hours.
Dahl asked if there are any recommendations for the use
of Flying Cloud Fields. Lambert said he is concerned with
fall soccer and football and proposes that night practices
be played on the outfields and Saturday games on the soccer
fields.
Bierman asked if there is a possibility that the Metropolitan
Airports Commission would donate these fields or allow the
City to purchase them. Lambert said they would not.
APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. July 18, 1988
-7-
Parrington asked if they would donate money toward irrigation.
Lambert said he doesn't think they would even consider
It.
Bierman said there are seven fields and nine mini fields
at Flying Cloud which means that the City needs even more
than Miller Park would have which is only six.
MOTION: Baker moved to recommend acceptance of staff's
recommendation that Franlo Park be irrigated and that use
of other athletic fields be limited. Joyer seconded the motion
and it passed 11-0. Lambert added that this issue will be
brought before the City Council on August 2.
VIII. REPORTS OF COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF
A. Reports of Recreation Supervisors
1. Update on Community Ed Development Plan
Lyndell Frey gave a brief review of what the group
is doing. $1 14,500 was set aside by the legislature
and given to community education groups to put together
a youth development plan which should involve all community
groups and the school district. They are in the process
of hiring a part-time development plan coordinator.
The next step for the group is to draw up an application
for youth to apply for the youth board.
2. American Red Cross "Be Safe" Program
Refer to memo dated June 27, 1988 from Lyndell Frey,
Recreation Supervisor.
This program will be incorporated into the summer playground
program at no cost to the City. The Eden Prairie
Foundation has donated $350.00 towards a Resusei Annie
to be used as part of the program.
B. Reports of Athletic Coordinator
1. Season Ending Reports
a. Men's 5-Man Basketball 1987-88
b. Men's "25 & Over" Hockey - Spring 1988
c. Racquetball - Winter 1988
d. Senior Men's Hockey - Spring 1988
e. Men's "25 & Over" Hockey - Winter 1987-88
f. Men's Volleyball - 1987-88
I WO