HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 06/21/1988AGENDA
TUESDAY, JUNE 21, 1988
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE IF ALLEGIANCE
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
7:31 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
7611 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia
Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to
the City Manager Craig Sawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director
John B. Frane, Director of Planning Chris
Enger, Iirector of Parks, Recreation &
Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director
of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and
Recording Secretary Deb Edlund
RILL CALL
I. APPROVAL IF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
A. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, April 5, 1988 Page 1220
B. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, April 19, 1988 Page 1238
C. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, May 3, 1988 Page 1250
D. Board of Review Meeting held Monday, May j , Page 1265
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List Page 1277
B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 25-88 amending Ordinance No. 13-85 Page 1148
to change the Name of Grantee—TCiEle TV
C. Purchase of Piano for Senior Center
D. Approval of Relocation Claim for Clarence & Lorraine Janke
E. Approve Special Assessment Agreement with Creek Knolls Partnership
for Bluff Road
F. Resolution No. 88-128 Giving Final Approval to the 1987 General
Fund Budget
G. Approve Plans and Specifications for Sanitary Sewer, Watermain and Page 1295
Street Improvements to Mitchell Road and Research Road and
Authorize Bids to be Received, I.C. 52-051 (Resolution No. 88-121)
H. Approve School Zone Speed Limits (Resolution Nos. 88-122, 88-123,
and 88-124)
Page 1278
Page 1283
Page 1287
Page 1291
Page 1296
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,June 21, 1988
Q.
I. Approve Plans and Specifications for Sanitary Sewer Watermain and
Street Improvements to Frani° Road and Authorize Bids to be
received, I.C. 52-132 (Resolution No. 88-125)
J. Request to Consider Allowing Private Vendor to Sell at Round Lake
Park on the 4th of July
K. TECHNOLOGY PARK PHASE IV by Technology Park Associates. 2nd
Reading of Ordinance No. 19-88-PUD-3-88, Planned Unit Development
District Review, with waiver, and Zoning District Change from Rural
to PUD-3-88-I-2 on 13 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for
Technology Park Phase IV; and Adoption of Resolution No. 88-101,
Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 19-88-PUD-3-88 and Ordering
Publication of Said Summary. 13 acres into one lot and two outlots
for construction of 162,860 square feet of industrial use in two
buildings. Location: West of Golden Triangle Drive, north of Nine
Mile Creek, east of Smetana Lane. (Ordinance No. 19-88-PUD-3-88,
Rezoning; Resolution No. 88-101, Authorizing Summary & Publication)
L. BLOSSOM RIDGE 2ND ADDITION by G. William Pearson. 2nd Reading of
Ordinance No. 20-88, Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on
6.32 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Blossom Ridge 2nd
Addition; and Adoption of Resolution No. 88-106, Authorizing
Summary of Ordinance No. 20-88 and Ordering Publication of Said
Summary. 6.32 acres into 14 single family lots and road right-of-
way. Location: South of Blossom Road, east of Windsor Terrace.
(Ordinance No. 20-88, Rezoning; Resolution No. 88-106, Authorizing
Summary & Publication)
M. Request Authorization to Purchase Playground Equipment for Wyndham
Knoll Park Willow Park and Eden Lake School Park
N. CHESTNUT APARTMENTS. Resolution No. 88-112, Recording Conformance
with and Releasing from Conditions of Mitchell Heights Developer's
Agreement for Chestnut Apartments.
O. WILSON POINT. Resolution No. 88-113, Recording Conformance with
Developer's Agreement for Wilson Point (aka Wilson Learning Center)
P. BARTH ADDITION by Bill Barth. Request for Preliminary Platting of
1.55 acres into two single family lots within the R1-22 Zoning
District. Location: 16481 Hilltop Road. (Resolution No. 88-114 -
Preliminary Plat)
NEIL POINT by John B. Bergstad. Request for Preliminary Platting
of 9.1 acres into one lot. Location: South of Anderson Lakes
Parkway, north of Neill Lake, west of Center Way extension.
(Resolution No. 88-115 - Preliminary Plat)
R. CDBG DAYCARE--Resolution Authorizing Hennepin County to Administer
CD8G Daycare Program on Behalf of Eden Prairie (Resolution No. 88-
110)
S. Final Plat Approval for Neil Point (located north of Neill Lake
south of Anderson Lakes Parkway and east of Preserve Boulevard
Pilution No. 88:1ThIC
Page 1303
Page 1304
Page 1305
Page 1314
Page 1321
Page 1322
Page 1326
Page 1328
Page 1332
Page 1337
Page 1338
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,June 21, 1988
T. Approve Reimbursement to Mr. Dan Hughes, 10310 Nottingham Trail
Page 1340
U. Approve Agreement with MnDOT for Engineering Services for TH 5 Page 1342
from CSAH 4 in Eden Prairie to CSAH 17 in Chanhassen
V. Award for Refuse Hauling Service from City Facilities Page 1372
W. Cummins/Grill Homestead Page 1373
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. HIDDEN GLEN IV by Derrick Companies. Request for Planned Unit Page 1379
Development Concept Amendment on approximately 68 acres, Zoning
District Amendment within an existing RM-6.5 Zoning District on 8.5
acres for the construction of 40 twinhome units. Location: South
of Townline Road, west of Dell Road, east of Highway 101.
(Resolution No. 88-116, PhD Concept Amendment to the Overall
Hidden Glen North Planned Unit Development Concept; Ordinance No.
26-88 - Zoning District Amendment within the RM-6.5 District;
Resolution No. 88-117 - Preliminary Plat)
B. VACATION 88-03 - DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS AMERICAN FAMILY
ADDITION Tqjialution No. 88-126)
Page 1388
C. VACATION 88-04 - DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS BAYPOINT TWO
Page 1391
(Resolution No. 88-127)
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
Page 1393
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Wooddale Church - Request for Release from condition of Developer's Page 1394
Agreement for bus garages
B. Earl Ingram Grading Permit Request Page 1395
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
IX. APPOINTMENTS
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
B. Report of City Manager
1. Departmental Changes - Fire & Inspections Departments
2. Update on City Manager Performance Review Process
C. Report of City Attorney
D. Report of Director of Planning
Page 1397
Page 1400
City Council Agenda
- 4 - Tues.,June 21, 1988
E. Report of Director of Parks Recreation & Natural Resources
F. Report of Director of Public Works
G. Report of Finance Director
XI. NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
(
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, APRIL 5, 1988
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
7:30 PM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and
Patricia Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant
to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director
John D. Frane, Director of Planning
Chris Enger, Director of Community
Services Robert Lamber, Director of
Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and
Recording Secretary Sue Anderson
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: All members present.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
MOTION:
Anderson moved, seconded by Harris to approve the Agenda and
Other Items of Business, as amended and published.
Bentley requested to make a brief report on National League of
City Conference Under ITEM X.A.
Anderson wanted to comment on the litigation of the State
Supreme Court on Bloomington's action on a law and ask City
Attorney about what Eden Prairie can do if it fits in with
anything that the City is doing.
Motion carried unanimously.
II. MINUTES
A. Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday. February 16
1988
The following change was made: Page 5, ITEM IX.D,
paragraph 2 should read: Pidcock nominated....
City Council Minutes 2 April 5, 1988
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley to approve the Minutes
of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, February 16,
1988 as published and amended. Motion carried
unanimously.
B. Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday. March 1. 1988
The following change was made: Page 11, ITEM X.A,
paragraph 4 should read: Harris felt the Council should
make a decision as to its position and be prepared when
the time arises to make a final decision.
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson to approve the Minutes
of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 1, 1988 as
published and amended. Motion carried unanimously.
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Final Plat_Approval for Bergman Addition (located west of
Rosemary Road and south of Holly Road) Resolution No. 88-
52
C. Final Plat Approval for Jenkins Addition (located north of
Research Road and east of Mitchell Road) Resolution No.
88-19
D. Final Plat Approval for Starrwood Addition (located north
of Research Road and east of Mitchell Road) Resolution No.
88-53
E. Final Plat Approval for Bell Oaks First Addition
(Creekview) (located south of Purgatory Creek, north of
Riverview Road and east of County Road 18) Resolution No.
88-54
F. Final Plat Approval for Windsong_JI 2nd Addition (located
east of Anderson Lakes Parkway and north of Windsong
Drive) Resolution No. 88-55
G. Receive Feasibility Study for Street. Sanitary Sewer and
Watermain Improvement* on Mitchell Road between_Carmody
Lane and County Road No. 1 and Research Road between
Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway and set Public
Hearlog. I.C. 52-051 (Resolution No. 88-56)
H. Approval of Change Order No. 5 for Valley View Road
Improvements. I.C. 51-272
City Council M
i
n
u
t
e
s
3 April 5, 1988
2nd Reading of
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
N
o
.
1
4
-
8
8
,
A
m
d
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
Section 2.11,
S
u
b
d
.
1
,
a
n
d
A
d
o
p
t
i
n
g
b
y
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
Chapter 1 and S
e
c
t
i
o
n
2
.
9
9
,
w
h
i
c
h
,
a
m
o
n
g
O
t
b
e
r
T
h
i
n
g
s
,
Contain Penalty
P
r
o
v
i
s
l
o
p
s
(
B
o
a
r
d
o
f
A
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
Appeals)
J. Resolution
N
o
.
8
8
-
5
7
,
P
r
o
c
l
a
i
m
i
h
g
_
A
p
r
i
l
a
s
C
a
b
l
e
Television Mont
h
K. JENKINS' ADDIT
I
O
N
b
y
J
o
h
n
J
e
n
k
i
n
s
.
2
n
d
R
e
a
d
i
n
g
o
f
Ordinance #60-
8
7
,
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
R
u
r
a
l
t
o
R
1
-
1
3
.
5
o
n
5
.
6
1
acres; Approval
o
f
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
'
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
J
e
n
k
i
n
s
'
Addition; and A
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
#
8
8
-
1
3
,
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
i
n
g
Summary of Ordi
n
a
n
c
e
#
6
0
-
8
7
a
n
d
O
r
d
e
r
i
n
g
P
u
b
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
Said Summary. 5
.
6
1
a
c
r
e
s
i
n
t
o
2
l
o
t
s
a
n
d
o
n
e
o
u
t
l
o
t
.
Location: Nort
h
o
f
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
R
o
a
d
,
s
o
u
t
h
o
f
R
i
d
g
e
w
o
o
d
West. (Ordinance #60-
8
7
,
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
;
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
#
8
8
-
1
3
,
Authorizing Sum
m
a
r
y
a
n
d
P
u
b
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
)
L. CREEKVIEW by B
r
o
w
n
L
a
n
d
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
(
B
e
l
l
O
a
k
s
F
i
r
s
t
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
)
2nd Reading of
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
#
8
-
8
8
-
O
U
D
-
1
-
8
8
,
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
Rural to PUD-1-
8
8
-
R
1
-
1
3
.
5
;
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
'
s
Agreement for
C
r
e
e
k
v
i
e
w
;
a
n
d
A
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
#
8
8
-
41, Authorizin
g
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
#
8
-
8
8
-
P
U
D
-
1
-
8
8
a
n
d
Ordering Publi
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
S
a
i
d
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
.
7
8
.
2
2
a
c
r
e
s
w
i
t
h
PUD variances,
Z
o
n
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
C
h
a
n
g
e
f
r
o
m
R
u
r
a
l
t
o
R
1
-
13.5 on 60.15 a
c
r
e
s
,
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
P
l
a
t
o
f
7
8
.
2
2
a
c
r
e
s
i
n
t
o
93 single fami
l
y
l
o
t
s
a
n
d
2
o
u
t
l
o
t
s
.
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
S
o
u
t
h
o
f
Bluffs East 4th
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
n
o
r
t
h
o
f
R
i
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
R
o
a
d
.
(Ordinance #8-
8
8
-
P
U
D
-
1
-
8
8
;
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
#
8
8
-
4
1
,
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
i
n
g
Summary and Pub
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
)
M. Request for Gr
a
d
i
n
g
P
e
r
m
i
t
b
y
S
c
o
t
t
B
r
a
u
,
1
6
2
0
1
P
i
o
n
e
e
r
Trail, to fill
a
n
d
l
e
v
e
l
h
i
s
y
a
r
d
a
r
e
a
N. Authorization f
o
r
R
o
o
f
R
e
p
a
i
r
a
t
8
9
5
0
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
R
o
a
d
O. Radios and Pol
i
c
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
t
P. Change Order No
.
a
,
F
i
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
C
o
R
t
r
a
c
t
MOTION:
Harris moved, s
e
c
o
n
d
e
d
b
y
P
i
d
c
o
c
k
t
o
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
i
t
e
m
s
A
-
P
o
n
the Consent Cal
e
n
d
a
r
.
Pidcock stated
t
h
a
t
s
h
e
f
e
l
t
u
n
c
o
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
e
w
i
t
h
I
t
e
m
J
a
n
d
requested reaso
n
i
n
g
f
o
r
i
t
b
e
i
n
g
p
u
t
i
n
a
t
t
h
i
s
i
t
m
e
.
Bentley replied
t
h
a
t
A
p
r
i
l
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
d
e
c
l
a
r
e
d
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Cable month an
d
a
l
l
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
a
r
e
r
e
c
o
g
n
i
z
i
n
g
i
t
.
Peterson added
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
o
r
h
a
s
d
e
c
l
a
r
e
d
t
h
i
s
a
s
well.
City Council Minutes 4 April 5, 1988
Harris requested a brief statement from Mr. Jullie
regarding Item P, Change order, as to negotiations taking
place for a lower financial commitment. Dawson replied
that some question has arisen to the extent of the City's
cost commitment to safeguard a power pole at the Fire
Station # 4. The City maintains that the system currently
provided is adequate and NSP believes a more elaborate
system is necessary. The City is trying to negotiate its
financial commitment to be for what was provided
initially, and to have NSP pick up the difference.
Motion carried unanimously.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Street and Utility Improvements on Golden Triangle Drive
I.C. 52-110 (Resolution No. 88-33) Continued from March 1,
1988
City Manager Jullie stated that this item was continued
from the March 1, 1988 Council meeting. At that meeting,
Hoyt Development requested that the project be ordered,
but Helle Development, which abuts the property in
question and has a contractual obligation to build the
roadway, requested the Council delay its decision to order
the improvements. It was hope that Mr. Helle would find a
buyer for his property during the interim, but a letter
received from Mr. Helle's representative this afternoon
indicated that a purchase agreement was not consummated.
Mr. Helle wished to go on record that he believed his
property would not be benefited from this road
improvement, he was not prepared to dedicate land to the
City, and he was not supportive of any type of assessment
to his property. To order this project, four affirmative
votes would be required from the Council.
Jullie summarized the project as a 300' long street with
some watermain construction necessary and having a
sidewalk.
Dietz showed graphics of the project area. The projected
cost are $116,000 due to the significant amount of
grading. Dietz reviewed th proposed assessment method.
Dietz stated that because of the request by Mr. Helle's
attorney, the project was behind schedule. As Mr. Jullie
stated if Mr. Helle did not agree to the road right-of-way
assessment, the City expected to pursue condemnation of
the right-of-way, causing another 30-to 60-day delay.
City Council Minutes 5 April 5, 1988
Brad Hoyt, Technology Associates, proposed that if the 50'
high hill of dirt is causing the increased cost he would
be willing to remove the dirt at his expense. Dietz
stated that this would solve the problem, but determining
the value of the dirt and proceeding through condemnation
Is still required.
Bentley asked Dietz if Staff and Hoyt were in agreement on
the assessments at this time. Dietz replied Hoyt had
stated he is not in favor of the assessments, but his
offer to remove and buy the dirt could be in lieu of those
assessments and that could be satisfactory. Bentley then
stated that the Resolution as it stands would still
indicate an assessment and would have to be negotiated at
a later date. Dietz replied this would be resolved at the
assessment hearing.
There were no further comments from the audience.
MOTION:
Anderson moved and seconded by Pidcock to close the Public
Hearing and adopt Resolution 488-33. Motion carried
unanimously.
B. WOODDALE CHURCH, by Wooddale Church, Request for Planned
Unit Development Concept Amendment on 31 Acres, Planned
Unit Development District Review and Zoning District
Amendment with the Public Zoning District on 31 acres with
variance for structure height to 200 feet, and
Environmental Assessment Worksheet Review for the
construction of 200,000 square feet of church and
educational uses. Location: Southwest corner of Shady
Oak Road and Bryant Lake Drive. (Resolution 488-43, PUD
Concept Amendment to Overall Wooddale PUD Concept;
Ordinance 415-88, Amending Ordinance 481-27 within the
Public District; Resolution 488-44, Submitting Finding of
No Significant Impact for Environmental Assessment
Worksheet)
Jullie stated that notice of this Public Hearing was sent
to owners of 25 surrounding properties and published in
the March 23, 1988 issue of the Eden Prairie News. The
proponent seeks PUD Concept Amendment on approximately 31
acres, PUD District Review on the acreage with variances
for building height and spire height, Zoning District
Amendment within an existing zoned Public District, and
Review of an EAW for construction of a new parking
facility for more than 1,000 vehicles. The property in
question is located south of Shady Oak Road and west of
Bryant Lake Drive.
City Council Minutes 6 April 5, 1988
Ken Betker, Chairman of the Woodale Architectural Task
Force presented the history of the Church, its place in
the community and its growth.
John Uban made a presentation and spoke of the changes
made through Staff and Commission recommendations as well
as the traffic study. Uban stated the issues that are
still in contention are: the steeple, and the height of
that addition to the building.
Uban commented that they looked at the position of the
Church in the community and perceived it to be in the
center, acting as a gateway element into the city. It was
trying to do something the community would be proud of.
The area surrounding the Church contains a regional park,
housing, a lake, and a junk yard. The high hill with
mature oaks will be preserved as it now creates a buffer
from the junk yard.
The Proponent found the Church being confused with other
buildings in the area and wanted something to distinguish
it as a Church. Uban presented drawings showing that the
facility barely would be seen from the roadway system. As
a result of these studies of elevation and view, the
Church concluded it wanted to have a feeling of presence
In the community, striving for moral and spiritual values.
Proponent realized it would have to meet special
conditions: the upper 125 feet not be occupied, and it
would not have any flashing lights.
Enger reported that this item was reviewed by the Planning
Commission at its February 22, 1988 meeting and again at
its April 4, 1988 meeting. The Commission has several
concerns: the height of the proposed structure, the
parking ramps needing to be concurrent with building
construction, non-compliance of exterior building
material, the massive vegetation changes, the physical
mass of the church as it relates to adjoining property,
the need for improved internal circulation. The Church
since has changed the site plan and is now requesting
specific approval of Phase III. It is not requesting
Final Approval for IV & V. A parking, traffic and
circulation study has been done. This item had not been
reviewed by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
Commission at this time.
Lambert commented on importance of the trail connection to
the regional park being completed during Phase IV & V and
recommended placing a time frame on this issue.
oas
City Council Minutes 7 April 5, 1988
Harris requested clarification on what is to be done in
Phase IV & V. Proponent replied Phase III builds the
sanctuary; Phase IV is enlarging parking area, a court
yard and gym; Phase V is a corridor which comes out to the
pond and small chapel.
Pidcock inquired about timing on the project. Porponent
replied that project would complete by 2005.
Pidcock then asked how lighting would work on tower.
Proponent replied lighting would be no brighter a source
than from offices in the background. Lights would be
shrouded.
Jerry Steelman, 6601 Golden Ridge Drive, stated the Church
Is an asset to our Community; however, his main concern
was height of building and its esthetic value.
Mitch won5on, 14007 Holly Road, etated concern about size
and height of proposed structure. This would be the
tallest structure in the City. He expressed concern about
precedent to be set if variances were granted. He asked
if religious institutions should have different rights
than other property owners.
Janet Garecke, 6022 Golden Ridge Drive, stated concern
about the height of building. She also commented that the
Church is a good neighbor.
Kent Molde, 7040 Willow Creek Road, requested
clarification on parking ramp phase. Proponent replied it
is looking at a one-ramp parking deck. Mr. Molde then
inquired about the bus garage. Proponent responded
stating that a City ordinance requires buses be enclosed
in a garage. Mr. Molde pointed out that the buses are
currently parked outside and suggested more berming and
screening of open area where buses are parked.
Vicky Windfeldt, 6621 Golden Ridge Drive, stated that the
church is located in her backyard, and she has watched the
development of the church for over 13 years. The church
does not look like a church, however, and could be
mistaken for a school. She believed the church should
look like a church. Mrs. Windfeldt wished to go on record
as favoring anything the church wished to do on this
particular project.
Peterson commented that this project touches a very
subjective area. He would not like to see any structure
dominate tht skyline; however, he did not feel a 200-foot
spire would obstruct the skyline.
/02 26
City Council Minutes 8 April 5, 1988
Bentley stated he could not envision the structure without
a steeple, that it would look incomplete. The Council had
already approved building equally as tall.
Bentley stated concern about the visual impact from the
Golden Ridge area. Enger replied that the proponent and
neighbors might pursue an individual look at yards. Uban
stated they would be willing to work with the neighbors on
this issue.
Harris stated this is a subjective judgement. She
believed the church is an appropriate use of the land on
that site.
Pidcock stated her comfort with the spire, but did have a
problem with the lighting. Proponent stated lights would
be on a timer and willingness to work out a reasonable
schedule with the neighbors.
Bentley stated that concerns about screening and bus
parking issues should be dealt with before 2nd Reading.
There were no further comments from the audience.
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to close the Public
Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 88-43 approving the PUD
Concept Amendment to the overall Wooddale PUD concept.
Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to approve 1st Reading
of Ordinance No. 15-88 to amend Ordinance No. 81-27 within
the Public District. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to adopt Resolution No.
88-44 to submit a Finding of No Significant Impact for the
Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to direct Staff to
prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission
and Staff recommendations and Council conditions and
concerns. Motion carried unanimously.
C. THE FARM 2ND ADDITION by Countryside Investments, Inc.
Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5
on 1.95 acres and from Public to R1-13.5 on 4.7 acres, and
""1
City Council Minutes 9 April 5, 1988
Preliminary Plat of 30 acres into 17 lots and 1 outlot.
Location: North of the intersection of Duck Lake Trail
and Loralee Lane. (Ordinance #16-88, Rezoning: Resolution
#88-45, Preliminary Plat)
Jullie stated that notice of this Public Hearing was sent
to owners of 97 surrounding properties and published in
the March 23, 1988 issue of the Eden Prairie News. The
overall proposal would have a 6.5 acre tract divided into
16 single-family lots with R1-13.5 Zoning. The Plat
consists of an entire 30-acre tract which is owned by King
of Glory Church and the Severson Family. Lot 17,
containing approximately 12 acres, would continue under
the ownership of the church. The outlot, which contains
about 11.5 acres and is within the Purgatory Creek
floodplain, is proposed to be dedicated to the City.
Ron Krueger made the presentation for the proponent.
Enger stated this item was reviewed by the Planning
Commission at its March 14, 1988 meeting, and it was
recommended for approval on a 6-0 vote.
Enger reported that all revisions have been made per Staff
recommendations. Before Final Plat approval proponent
would provide necessary storm water runoff details, before
Building Permit issuance proponent would be required to
pay the cash park fee, and prior to Grading Permit
proponent would need to notify City and watershed district
of placement of erosion control and fencing.
Lambert reported that The Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission reviewed this item at its March 21,
1988 meeting and recommended approval on a 7-0 vote.
Anderson stated that there was a large floodplain in that
area and asked if as more development occurs, can areas be
preserved for access by the public. Lambert replied there
will be a trail easement across the floodplain area. A
nature trail would be connecting Dell Road to Duck Lake
Road. There is also a possibility of trails connecting to
the south to the church property. Anderson then inquired
if there would be access through the church property.
Lambert stated that proposing that the church provide an
access across its property has not been recommended.
Anderson then stated concern about the church being able
to deny access across its property at any time and the
current lack of access to this area. Lambert replied if
this is a concern, he suggests requiring a trail easement
across church property.
There were no further comments from the audience.
City Council Minutes 10 April 5, 1988
MOTION:
Bentley moved and seconded by Pidcock to close the Public
Hearing and approve 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 16-88 for
Rezoning. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION:
Bentley moved and seconded by Pidcock to adopt Resolution
No. 88-45 approving the Preliminary Plat. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION:
Bentley moved and seconded by Pidcock to direct Staff to
prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission
and Staff recommendations, including the negotiation of a
trail easement with the church. Motion carried
unanimously.
D. GOLF POINT by Associated Investments, Inc. Request for
Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density
Residential to Medium Density Residential on 2.8 acres,
Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 and
Preliminary Platting of 2.8 acres into 15 lots and 1
outlot for construction of 15 townhouse units. Location:
South of Valley View Road, east of Chicago & Northwestern
Railroad. (Resolution #88-46, Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment; Ordinance #16-88, Rezoning; Resolution #88-47,
Preliminary Plat)
Jullie stated that notice of this Public Hearing was sent
to owners of 20 surrounding properties and published in
the March 23, 1988 issue of the Eden Prairie News.
Tom Robertson, Associated Investors, Inc. presented the
project. Robertson stated his concern that to complete
this project depends on the Valley View Road alignment
allowing the project the necessary land to meet the
requirement of the RM-6.5 Zoning District.
Robertson further stated that proponent has had the
property for some time and has been unable to use it.
Proponent understood that if there were a major change to
Valley View Road, it would have to go back to the Planning
Commission for review.
Enger reported the Planning Commission reviewed, this item
at its March 14, 1988 meeting and recommended approval on
a 6-0 vote.
Fnger stated that this item should not be given a Second
Reading until the Valley View Road issue is resolved.
2).9
City Council Minutes 11 April 5, 1988
Lambert reported that this item was reviewed by the Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Commission at its March 21,
1988 meeting and recommended for approval on a 7-0 vote.
Anderson stated concern for a project to be built in this
area knowing there is a flood potential, and suggested
receiving recommendations from Watershed District.
Robertson replied that he has no problem with this and is
willing to raise the level of the area.
Bentley inquired if this property was guided in the
original PUD as low-density residential. Enger replied he
did not recall the original designation„ but it was now
shown as low-density residential. Bentley then questioned
If this property was envisioned as part of the Edenvale
Open Space Area. Enger replied he was not sure, but he
would check.
There were no further comments from the audience.
MOTION:
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to close the Public
Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 88-46 for the
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION:
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve 1st Reading
of Ordinance No. 16-88 for Rezoning. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION:
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to adopt Resolution No.
88-47 approving the Preliminary Plat. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION:
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to direct Staff to
prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission
and Staff recommendations and Council conditions,
Including delay of the Second Reading until the matter of
how Valley View Road is to be constructed and vacated.
Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes 12 April 5, 1988
E. EDEN PLACE CENTER by Prairie Entertainment Associates.
Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment and
Zoning District Amendment within the C -Reg-Ser District on
6.42 acres and Preliminary Platting of 6.42 acres into 1
lot for construction of 52,000 square feet of retail and
restaurant use. Location: West of Glen Lane, south and
east of Eden Road. (Resolution #88-48, PUD Concept
Amendment to Overall Eden Glen PUD; Ordinance #5-88,
Zoning District Amendment; Resolution #88-49, Preliminary
Plat)
Jullie stated that notice of this Public Hearing was sent
to owners of 23 surrounding properties and published in
the March 23, 1988 issue of the Eden Prairie News.
Brian Cluts, made a presentation for proponent. Proponent
requested a PUD amendment for site which was originally
proposed for restaurant and cinema use. The project is
now proposed as one restaurant and retail space of 52,000
SF which has met all Planning Commission requirements as
far as parking and tree replacement. Proponent has
introduced sidewalks and presented exterior material for
approval by Commission. Proponent wishes to proceed with
project in a timely fashion.
Norman Brody stated he is negotiating with two tenants,
Fred G. Anderson and Best Buy.
Dan Danford, President of Ciatti's Restaurant, stated It
Is his intent to be a tenant, opening sometime in
September. Ciatti's has formalized a commitment, having a
lease agreement and letter of intent.
Enger reported the Planning Commission reviewed this item
at its March 14, 1988 meeting and recommended approval on
a 6-0 vote subject to the following recommendations: 1)
Color samples and exterior materials be submitted, which
has been done. 2) Revise plan to indicate sidewalks. 3)
Before Final Plat approval provide detailed utility and
storm water run-off and erosion control plans. 4) Provide
signage plan. 5) Provide lighting details. 6) Submit plans
for review by the City Fire Marshal. 7) Prior to Grading
permit issuance, stake the construction limits with snow
fence and replace any trees lost per tree preservation
policy.
Enger further reported that the signage, lighting, and
grading details have not been firmed up. The restaurant
is a critical part of the PUD and provides a needed
service to the community. Retail alone would not be
appropriate and would contribute to an overbalance of
retail in the PUD; therefore, if the restaurant were taken
out the proponent would be required to return to the
Planning Commission.
City Council Minutes 13 April 5, 1988
Lambert reported that the Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission reviewed this item at its March 21,
1988 meeting and recommended approval on a 7-0 vote.
Pidcock stated concern that this plan looked like a strip
mall and she wished to see more outdoor planning around
the entrance to restaurant. Proponent replied that it has
increased the plaza area and an outside seating area is
planned for summer months.
Bentley commented on importance of Planning Commission's
recommendation that a major restaurant is critical and a
firm commitment from a major restaurant be in place before
the project can proceed.
Bentley questioned the western elevation of building as
viewed from the west: its screening, way the loading docks
are to be handled etc.. Proponent replied berming will be
used for screening and it is proposing a single entrance.
The same architecture and signage would be present in the
rear of building as in front.
Bentley asked for clarification from Enger on signage
issue. Enger replied that in a building like this one,
the signage can change the entire appearance of the
building. A sign package is not proposed at this time.
Bentley then inquired what Enger would suggest. Enger
replied that if Council had this concern for the project
be carried over in order to provide the signage
Information, or if Council was comfortable with progress
at this time, the information could be provided between
1st and 2nd Reading.
Peterson stated concern about compatibility of this
project and downtown project, and about the timing of this
proposal.
There were no further audience comments.
MOTION:
Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley to close the Public
Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 88-48 for the PUD Concept
Amendment to the overall Eden Glen PUD. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION:
Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley to approve 1st Reading
of Ordinance No. 5-88 approving the Zoning District
Amendment. Motion carried unanimously.
I
City Council Minutes 14 April 5, 1988
MOTION:
Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley to adopt Resolution
No. 88-49 approving the Preliminary Plat and direct Staff
to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating
Commission and Staff recommendations and that the signage
issue be resolved prior to 2nd Reading. Motion carried
unanimously.
F. ALPINE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION by Red Rock Heights
Partnership. Request for Zoning District Change from R1-
13.5 on 8.4 acres with lot depth variances to be reviewed
by the Board of Appeals, Preliminary Platting of 8.4 acres
into 17 single-family lots and road right-of-way.
Location: East of Alpine Trail, South of Chicago,
Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad. (Resolution #88-
50, Denial of Second Reading of Ordinance 20-87; Ordinance
#6-88, Rezoning; Resolution #88-51, Preliminary Plat)
Jullie stated that notice of this Public Hearing was sent
to onwers of 43 surrounding properties and published in
the March 23, 1988 issue of the Eden Prairie News.
Bill Gilk, representing Red Rock Heights Partnership, made
a presentation requesting rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5
for 16 lots. The major changes from the original proposal
are a reduction in the required amount of imported dirt by
1/3, the tree loss, and the intrusion into a sizeable
hill.
Enger reported that the Planning Commission reviewed this
Issue at its March 14, 1988 meeting and recommended
approval on a 6-0 vote. Enger pointed out that 21,000
cubic yards of dirt would be required to be brought in by
the developer and not by individual builders, and the
developer had agreed to do this. Retaining wall would be
required in 3-4 northeastern lots.
Lambert reported that this item was reviewed at its March
21, 1988 meeting and was recommended for approval on a 7-0
vote.
Anderson asked Mr. Lambert if there was a floodplain
adjacent to this area. Lambert replied yes. Anderson
wants to be assured provision will be made for a future
trail.
Gilk commented that an official public trail was not
there. The trail currently there is on private property,
created and designed for owners enjoyment.
12.3
City Council Minutes 15 April 5, 1988
Peterson questioned the time needed to haul the dirt. The
90-day time limit would require a minimum of 15 vehicles
per day, seven days a week. 120 days were requested. He
asked how the impact on residents in the area could be
reduced. Gilk stated that the original requirement had
been reduced by 1/3. His concern was the safety of
residents, and believed trucks would have to slow down.
There were no further comments from the audience.
MOTION:
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to close the Public
Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 88-50 stating denial of
2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 20-87. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION:
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve 1st Reading
of Ordinance No. 6-88 for Rezoning. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION:
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to adopt Resolution No.
88-51 approving the Preliminary Plat and to direct Staff
to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating
Commission and Staff recommendations and Council concerns
regarding trail connection. Motion carried unanimously.
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve the Payment of
Claims Nos. 41349 to 41753. Roll call vote: Anderson,
Bentley, Harris, Pidcock and Peterson voted "aye". Motion
carried unanimously.
VI. ORQINANCES & RESOLUTIONa
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. FLYING CLOUD OFFICE WAREHOUSE CONDOMINIUM by Eugene M.
Branstrom. Request for Sity Plan Review within the 1-2
District on 2.29 acres for construction of a 9,848 square
foot office/warehouse. Location: South of Pioneer Trail
at Yorkshire Lane, North of County Road N 1.
024
City Council Minutes 16 April 5, 1988
Jullie stated that notice of the Council's consideration
of this matter was sent to owners of 58 surrounding
properties and published in the March 23, 1988 issue of
the Eden Prairie News. The proponent seeks approval of a
Site Plan Review within a 1-2 District for construction of
a 9,848 square-foot office/warehouse building.
Enger stated that Mr. Eugene Branstrom was available for
any questions. Proponent was proposing a sister building
to one already existing and planned for in the original
zoning. Enger further stated that the Planning Commission
reviewed this item at its March 14, 1988 meeting and
recommended approval on a 6-0 vote.
There were no further comments from the audience.
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve the Plan
based on the Site Plan Review. Motion carried
unanimously.
B. REQUEST OF NEW RINK COMMITTEE A "New Rink Committee" has
requested that the City Council consider the construction
of a second indoor ice rink in Eden Prairie. Two letters
supporting such construction had been sent.
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley to continue this item
until after completion of the Comprehensive Park Plan.
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
IX. APPOINTMENTS
A. APPOINTMENT OF TWO MEMBERS TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS &
Anaka Under Item 111.1. of the Consent Calendar, the
Council expands the numbers to this board from seven to
nine. The two seats on the Board would have terms of two
and three years.
Harris nominated Michael Bozonie. Pidcock nominated Scott
Anderson.
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to close the
nominations and cast a unanimous ballot for Michael
Bozonie and Scott Anderson. Motion carried unanimously.
OS
City Council Minutes 17 April 5, 1988
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock relative to previous
motion, Scott Anderson be given the two-year and Michael
Bozonie be give the three-year term. Motion carried
unanimously.
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
Bentley commented on memo he prepared relative to the
recent National League of Cities Conference in Washington,
DC. He believed it was an excellent conference. He
recommended the City become a member of the National
League of Cities.
Pidcock reported on the article in the New York Times
Indicating Eden Prairie as a fast growing suburb. Bob
Lambert was quoted in this article.
Anderson questioned the significance of the Minnesota
Supreme Court regarding the Bloomington case. Mr. Pauly
stated he will review this and report at a future meeting.
B. Report of City MangaeL
1. Discussion on Development Phasing,
Council received the City Manager's memorandum on
this matter.
No action was required.
2. Discussion on Downtown Area Planning
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris approval of the
direction of the City's role in the Planning of
Downtown Area. Motion carried unanimously.
3. City Participation in T.H. 5 Pordect
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to delay this item
until Mr. Jullie met with this group next week.
Bentley asked if dollars were committed at this
point. Jullie responded no. The City would have to
return with a joint powers agreement.
Motion carried unanimously.
123C,
City Council Minutes 18 April 5, 1988
C. Report of City Attorney
D. Report of Director of Planning
No Report
E. Report of Director of Community Services
cgmprehensiv_e_Rarl_RlAn Revised Contract & Scope of
Services.
MOTION:
Pidcock moved to continue this item to next meeting.
Motion died for lack of a second.
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to approve
revisions to contract.
Pauly requested Item 9.10.7 to read as follows: Give
promt written notice to the CONSULTANT whenever the
CITY observes or otherwise becomes aware of any
development that affects the timing of the CONSULTANT
services.
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to amend previous
motion and to strike from Section 9.10.7 the
language, "any defect in the work of the CONSULTANT."
Motion carried unanimously.
F. Reor.1 of Director of Public Works
No Report
G. Report of Finance Director
XI. NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to adjourn the meeting at
11:58 PM. Motion carried unanimously.
Avil
Eden Prairie City Council Meeting
April 19, 1988 Page 1
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
gDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
7:30 PM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Jean
Harris, and Patricia Pidcock.
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig
Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D.
Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Community
Services Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A.
Dietz, and Recording Secretary Sue Anderson.
TUESDAY
APRIL 19, 1988
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: All Present
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following items were added to the Agenda: Ill. I-1. Resolution 88-60 Proclaiming April 24-30 National
Consumers Week in Eden Prairie; Ill. I. Request for Grading Permit by Dick Feerick for Legion Industrial
Park; X.A.1. Suggestion for a City-wide Clean-Up Day; X.B.2. Miscellaneous Discussion Items.
MOTION
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to approve the Agenda and Other Items of Business, as published
and amended. Motion carried unanimously.
II. MINUTES
None
M. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Receive Feasibility Study for Street, Sanitary Sewer and VVatermain Improvements on Franlo Road
between Prairie Center Drive and Grier Lane and set Public Hearing. I.C. 52-13 (Resolution No. 88-
59)
C. BIRCH WOOD LABS. INC by Birchwood Labs, Inc. Approval of Developer's Agreement for
Birchwood Labs. Preliminary Platting 01 16.5 acres into four lots with variances for lot frontage.
Location: East of County Road 4, west of Fuller Road, north of Lincoln Lane
Eden Prairie City Council Meeting
April 19, 1988 Page 2
D. 6 TO Z RENTAL by A to Z Rental. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 13-88, Rezoning from Rural to
C-Reg-Service on 1.67 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals; Approval of Developer's Agreement for A to Z Rental; and Adoption of Resolution No, 88-58, Authorizing
Summary of Ordinance No. 13-88 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 3.59 acres into one
lot and one outlot for construction of a 15,500 square foot retail facility. Location: Southwest corner
of Valley View Road and Plaza Drive.
E. Chanae Order No. 3 - Eden Prairie Community Center
F. Chanoe Order No 6- Anderson Lakes Parkway between TH. 169 and Mitchell Road. I.C. 52-035
G. Pecentralization of First Call for Help
H. Resolution 88-60 Proclaiming April 24-30 National Consumers Week in Eden Prairie
Request for Gradina Permit by Dick Feerick for Legion Industrial Park for 9,33 acre site
MOTION
Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley to approve Items A-I on the Consent Calendar. Motion carrie
d
unanimously.
Iv. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 41754-42016
MOTION
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris, to approve the Payment of Claims No. 41754-42016. Roll call vot
e
:
Anderson, Bentley, Harris, Pidcock and Peterson voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
None
VII. PETITIONS. REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. ZAHLER GRADING PERMIT
City Manager Jullie reported that this item related to an after-the-fact grading permit which the Council
discussed at its March 1st meeting. During the interim, Staff received comments from adjacent
property owners and analyzed the impact of possible restorative work. The Staff memo indicated a
tree planting plan with an estimated cost of $1500 had been suggested by Mr. Zahler. He stated that
Staff was recommending that the grading permit be granted subject to the installation of all plant
materials following staff approval of plans.
Bill Schechter, 171 Cedarcrest stated that he, Mr. Lilly and Mr. Zahler did not come to any
consensus. He stated he had not seen the tree replacement plan Jullie spoke of.
Dietz reported that $1500 was the estimate to fill in the hole. In Staff's opinion, to fill in the hole would
be detrimental, and instead the $1500 should be spent on tree replacement.
Eden Prairie City Council Meeting April 19, 1988 Page 3
Peterson and Bentley stated the sole purpose for continuing this matter was to make a determination
of the wisdom for restoration and discussion among the neighbors. The issue before the Council was
to approve or deny a grading permit for which the grading had been done.
Schechter stated he was concerned with the ecology of the area with respect to Zahler's grading. He
asked the City to bring in specialists to determine a remedy. He felt they had become emotional about
this matter but would like to live peacefully in the neighborhood. Discussion took place on the
chronology of events. Slides were presented to show the property and affected adjacent properties.
Staff believed filling the hole would aggravate the problem and damage the area environmentally
Pidcock inquired if the plantings were going to just beautify Mr. Zahler's property or would it enhance
all the neighbors'.
Jeff Johnson, Engineering Technician, stated at the neighborhood meeting, there was a split
decision - two of the neighbors agreed with the planting concept and two felt they were not affected
by the grading.
Schechter stated he and Lilly and one new neighbor should be the only ones to be considered in a
decision. The other property owners are not even affected.
Anderson inquired to Schechter it he had anything in writing from the experts he talked to. He
responded that he has notes and can have it put in letter format. Anderson asked if he has anything
from the DNA. He responded that he hoped the City would sought and supplied an official DNA
report, and that he did talk to them on the phone regarding the matter.
Anderson inquired of Staff if the City had inquired to other agencies besides the City Engineering
Department. Dietz responded it had not.
James Zahler commented the situation could be solved. He reported on the meeting with Peter
Lilly and Phil Schechter whereby in lieu of spending $1500 to fill in the pond, they agreed they would
split the money and drop the matter. Zahler then contacted City Attorney Pauly and was advised to do
what he had to do to settle the problem. Zahler was willing to do it to make everyone happy. Dietz
called Zahler to inform them that it was not ethical to pay off Lilly and Schechter and suggested the
$1500 be spent on tree plantings in the area to perhaps enhance Lilly and Schechter's property.
MOTION
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris that the City grant the grading permit subject to 1) submission of
a detailed landscape and planting plan, 2) agreement by Mr. Zahler to spend approximately $1500 on
tree planting, with the final amount to be determined by Staff, and 3) that adjacent property owners be
given a one-time opportunity to make suggestions for the final planting plan. Staff was to contact the
affected owners of neighboring properties when the plan had been submitted in order that they could
make comments in a timely manner. Motion carried unanimously.
B. GRADING PERMIT FOR MWCC INTERCEPTOR AT RIVERVIEW ROAD
Jullie reported that the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission applied for a grading permit from the
City to restore the ground around the sewer interceptor failure resulting from the July 1987 storm.
The elevations proposed on the grading plan conformed to the integrity of the land. Staff met with
property owners individually and related their concerns to the MWCC staff. Based on the review, the
City Engineering Department recommended that the grading permit be issued to MWCC subject to
the following five conditions: 1) riprap be installed at the termination of the access road at the toe of
the river bluff; 2) the seed mixture used for turf establishment be designed to incorporate plant types
that naturally exist on the river bluff as well as a nurse crop that will provide an initial quick growth and
protection from erosion: 3) the planting schedule be broadened to include some tree varieties on the
110
Eden Prairie City Council Meeting April 19, 1988 Page 4
river bluff and river floodplain area that will assist in a more rapid restoration of the tree mass that
existed in those areas prior to the July 23 storm event; 4) MWCC shall agree to perform inspections of
the river bluff area after each rainfall event during the initial turf establishment period and to
immediately correct any areas of erosion that occur; and 5) MWCC would complete a pavement
evaluation of those segments of Homeward Hills Road, Concord Drive, Riverview Road and Riverview
Drive used as haul roads for delivery of fill materials used for bluff restoration and would repair any
segments that show deterioration of pavement strength or base as a result of the construction
activities.
Bentley commented he was glad that a resolution was finally occurring.
Laura Bluml, 10540 Riverside Drive presented her album of what had occurred on the property. She
spoke of six issues of concern: 1) that there be proper transition between the reconstructed area with
respect to topography; 2) minimum public access to the restored area; 3) minimization of bluff and
floodplain accessibility; 4) replacement of trees destroyed by MWCC in the floodplaining; 5) clean up
of raw sewage spilled into the floodplain and to her property, as it had not been determined if our
property is safe for us to build a house on at this time; and 6) and the rebuilding of the roads on
Riverview Drive.
Jullie stated the MWCC should be receptive to testing the area soil, etc.
Roger Acton, Deputy Director of Construction of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission,
stated he has been dealing through the MWCC's legal counsel with all the parties involved. The
Commission has been served with three lawsuits from people adjacent to the MWCC property. He felt
ft was inappropriate for the Commission to discuss these matters at this meeting.
Bentley mentioned that if there was the potential threat to public health and welfare from danger to
pollution, that it would be appropriate to request additional testing.
Acton responded that the MWCC considered itself a responsible citizen and answered the problems
of its constituents.
Anderson asked the City Attorney if it was in the best interest of the City to work out tree replacement
and grading before the neighbors have settled their legal disputes. Pauly responded yes, that there
are special instances when settling a portion of the problem is advisable since lawsuits can go on for
years.
Peterson mentioned that the Council could not get into the other matters mentioned by residents,
and that presently it was to look at the restoration program.
Gayle Diehl, 10503 Riverview Drive, stated that those persons not involved in lawsuits have been
approached about the tree replacement. Her concern was that if the trees were planted in
polluted/ruined soil they would not grow. She asked what guarantees did the residents have that the
trees would be planted in good soil, watered and have an opportunity to grow.
Harris affirmed there would be an inspection of the soils and the potential for trees to grow.
Dr. James Diehl stated that at present ponds in the floodplain were a health menace, and there
should be a concentrated effort to clean the area up. City Engineer expressed the City's desire to
bring it back to its original condition as well as they possible
Marty Timm, 10489 Riverview Drive, requested an overview from the MWCC, as was concerned
over the permanent structure being put up over the road. Bob Robertson, a member of the
Eden Prairie City Council Meeting April 19, 1988 Page 5
engineering firm under contract with the MWCC, stated that the City recommendation is to place the
riprap at the bottom of the road.
MOTION I
Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to approve the grading permit subject to Staff conditions
excluding any approval of plantings other than turf, and not giving up the City's right to require
additional vegetation, Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION 2
Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to direct Staff to work with MWCC on the final planting plan
that will be subject to City and MWCC review, and that the MWCC would be requested to share any
and all available data relative to any tree loss that occurred. Any final approval will be with adherence to
the City's tree replacement policy. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION 3
Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to direct Staff to request the MPCA to do soil quality tests on
affected private property as necessary and in the floodplain area. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION 4
Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock to direct Staff to work with the MWCC to create an agreement
that would include the maintenance program of successful revegetation in the lower floodplain area,
and permanent upkeep and maintenance of the area due to debris which may accumulate in the area.
Motion carried unanimously.
C. PETITION REGARDING MITCHELL LAKE WATER LEVEL
Jullie reported on the history of the Chain-of-Lakes storm sewer and the elevation of Mitchell Lake.
Tim CraM, 7919 Bay Curve, President of Timberlakes Homeowners Association, voiced his and
other homeowners position about the lake level at 870'; they are requesting it be higher. He did not
have written petition from the Association; rather this was a position voiced by an independent owner
and not by vote of the Association Board of Directors. He stated he was led to believe by Mr. Dietz
that the DNA recommendation was 870';it was only after contacting the DNA that they learned that the
DNA recommended establishing it at 871.5' not 871'. The DNA did allow a 1.5' variance and that was
what the City Engineer took into account.
David LudyIg, 7998 Island Road, encouraged the City to go forward with the Chain-of-Lakes
Management plan; however, felt his property was safe at 871' level.
Jim Nehl, 8011 Island Road, concurred with Tim Crain's remarks that he was in favor of the highest
level.
Jim Perkins, 8003 Island Road, he has pond that is connected via a small channel and a pipeline to
Mitchell Lake. His interest is that if the water level in Mitchell Lake is low, his pond will go down and
have weed growth that would make Mitchell Lake inaccessible by boat. He said the danger to ecology
and fish population should be considered if the spring lacks sufficient precipitation.
Bob Hutt, 7970 Island Road, living in the north bay, stated the water level in the bay, in the past, has
run dry and was choked with weeds. If this summer is also dry, the area will be aesthetically destroyed,
and have fish kill.
Bill Scholz, 7924 Island Road, resident of the northern bay, stated his concern about the lower level
in Mitchell Lake, and felt it should be reconsidered.
Eden Prairie City Council Meeting
April 19, 1988 Page 6
Bill Brubaker, 8014 Island Road, stated he supported the higher lake level.
Glen Frfeted, 17247 West 78th, inquired why the Watershed District was controlling this, and why
the DNR was not involved with this at this time. Dietz responded that the DNR was involved and they
set the high water mark elevation at 871.5' and that can be varied by 1.5', and that was established.
Fristed inquired if the data was available on how the level mark was determined. Dietz replied that the
data was in the 1979 report.
Mike Eames, 17345 West 78th, owned 1900 feet of lake shore at the nortn end of the lake. He has
Wed there for 34 years, and stated if the water level is raised, he will lose the use of his dock and boat
house as well as two acres of his land, and who will pay money for that. On that two acres there is a
150 year old oak tree that would die if the water level was higher. Eames was concerned that after
living there for 34 years, and stocking the lake with baby fish, people who have lived there for just a
short time can change the level and control the lake to enhance their property - it just did not seem fair
to him.
Anderson spoke about saving the trees. There was discussion on the Mitchell Lake water levels as
monitored by Barr Engineering. In June 1985 the level was at 871.4; Oct., Jan., & Feb. the level was
at 871'; March 1986 the level was at 872'; April the level was at 872.9'; and October 1986 was at 874'
flood stage.
Bruce Fossey, 7942 Island Road, has lived there 8 years and stated he has seen high and low
water levels. He felt if the lake was at the lower level for the next 34 years, it would be an eyesore and
a liability. At the higher level of 871,5', it would be an asset to the community. He inquired what the
ground level of the lake was, Dietz replied 870.7' was the level the day before
Anderson inquired to Staff if the City could control the level. Dietz replied the City can control the
level with the DNR at this time.
Bentley inquired to Staff what would happen if 871' level was maintained. Dietz explained, by giving
detailed background regarding the Z minimum lowest floor elevation above the flood elevation, that
there were homeowners that wanted more water, and homeowners who wanted more beach, and the
technical history of the project. He concluded that if the Council wanted to pursue this further, the
questions should be directed to the Watershed District.
Pidcock moved to have a public hearing with Watershed District, and that all factions be heard again to
establish the water mark for Mitchell Lake. Motion died.
Dietz stated if it came to be that the lake level was raised it would be a temporary thing. Until there was
more development on the lake, at which time the flood stage could be reached earlier at 874'. A 2'
difference between home and high water elevation must be met before raising the water level.
Pidcock was hearing that the people would be satisfied at 871, but she did not hear if that level was
safe.
Anderson felt this was a planned stage that has gone through a public hearing and until a year has
passed with the water level at 870' and the results are viewed, there was not basis to say this was too
high or too low.
Peterson stated if experience shows the Council that 870' is too low, it would not be adverse to
raising the level to 871'.
Eden Prairie City Council Meeting
April 19, 1988 Page 7
MOTION 1
Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to approve the lake level elevation at Mitchell Lake at 870', and
monitor the water level annually for 3 to 5 years, and report back to Council. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION Z
Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to direct Staff to investigate and prepare a report for the
Council on recommendations for the Kerber Pond with regard to the effect of lowering Mitchell Lake.
Motion carried unanimously.
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
None
IX. APPOINTMENTS
A. REPRESENTATIVE TO MINNETONKA commuNITy SERVICES ADVISORY
COUNCIL
Peterson reported that Robert Mavis sent a letter indicating he was unable to continue representing
Eden Prairie on the Minnetonka Community Service Advisory Council. He stated that the name of
Sue Keller was suggested as someone interested in the school systems and who possibly represent
Eden Prairie. Peterson contacted Mrs. Keller, who lives in Eden Prairie and has children in the
Minnetonka School System, and would be honored to be nominated and appointed.
MOTION
Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to nominate and appoint Mrs. Sue Keller to serve as the Eden
Prairie representative on the Minnetonka Community Services Advisory Council. Motion carried
unanimously.
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
Harris was concerned about the tin cans and rubbish that adorn the lake shore. She suggested some
how making the citizens and homeowners aware of the degree of pollution that was being created.
Bentley suggested the scout groups, community clubs, etc. should be looking at possible
involvement. Anderson suggested a City-wide Clean-Up Eden Prairie Day.
Peterson strongly encouraged a volunteer effort and was aware it would require months of planning
and some staff to coordinate pickup of larger articles of rubbish. Lambert stated he would contact the
school groups and on a small scale, they could concentrate on the clean-up of the worst areas.
Anderson agreed with Lambert it would take a year to get the whole community involved.
Peterson stated the Jaycees or Lions could take on the project.
B. Report of City Manner
1. CITY PARTICIPATION IN HIGHWAY 5 PROJECT
Jullie reported that MnDOT has suggested that the City of Eden Prairie act as lead agency for contract
administration of the design work for improvements on Highway 5 between Carnelian Lane and
1,244
Eden Prairie City Council Meeting
April 19, 1988 Page 8
County Road 17 in Chanhassen. The meetings have indicated cooperation among all concerned
parties and that the improvement process could be accelerated to achieve a June 1989 contract
letting and Fall 1990 completion of construction.
Staff recommended that Council give preliminary approval for the City to act as the lead agency and
authorize negotiations with Barton-Aschman Associates and the Minnesota Department of
Transportation to proceed with the contract for design work.
MOTION
Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to grant City the approval to be the lead agency and
authorize negotiations in accordance with Staff recommendations. Motion passed 4-1. Bentley
opposed on the basis that it was in appropriate to spend property tax dollars on state highways.
2. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
Jullie reported that Rogers Cable TV was selling its North American operations.
On April 26th, PCA Board Meeting will be held regarding the landfill contested case hearing. The City
has informed the homeowners group that a bus service will be provided.
Jullie asked Dietz to update the Council on the water main break at Highway 5 and Mitchell Road.
Dietz stated it was being repaired presently and it occurred when the contractor for the Highway 5
project hit the water main.
Jullie reported the City received $250,000 for the drug bust at the International Airport, and a proposal
for expenditure will be presented to Council.
C. Report of City Attorney
1. COMMENTS ON SUPREME COURT DECISION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL
PRESERVATION
Pauly, at Council's request, analyzed the recent decision of Swanson vs. the City of Bloomington.
Pauly reported the case involved a request by a property owner to subdivide an approximately one-
acre lot containing a single-family home. For 30 some years, the property was subject to restrictive
covenants prohibiting subdivision of the large lots and protecting wooded natural environments. The
Bloomington Council denied the subdividing of the lot on the basis of 1) the physical characteristics o
f
the site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage,
and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated;
2) the design of the subdivision was likely to cause substantial environmental damage; and 3) the
design of the subdivision would be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public.
The City of Bloomington felt an additional home site on the lot would jeopardize vegetation on the lot,
stress the vegetation upon the surrounding properties, and increase the possibility of tree disease
and wind damage.
Pauly stated that Chapter 12 of the City Code, which provides subdivision regulations, contained little
in the way of a prohibition against subdivision for environmental reasons. He felt it might be desirable
to set out environmental and other standards which would apply in each instance of rezoning,
requesting permits for floodplain and shoreland development, land alterations and sloped ground
development, as well as subdivisions.
Eden Prairie City Council Meeting April 19, 1988 Page 9
MOTION
Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to authorize City Attorney, and Staff to review and catalog
the environmental standards throughout Chapters 11 and 12 with a view for strengthening their
implementation. Motion carried unanimously.
2. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
Pauly also reported that the House Conferees were able to keep out the amendment which the
Senate had included in its Waste Management Act to repeal the landfill siting provisions of that act.
The net effect was that they would not be repealed under the Conference Committee Report.
D. Report of Director of Planning
None
E. Report otpirector of Community_ Services
1. EDENVALE GOLF COURSE PROPOSAL
Lambert reported that on April 15, the City received a letter from the attorney representing Edemale
Goff Course, Inc. requesting that its offer to see the Edenvale Golf Course to the City of Eden Prairie
be withdrawn.
Negotiations between Staff and the golf course had proceeded to the point where staff was prepared
to recommend to Council a purchase price of $2.0-2.5 million versus the selling price of $6 million. In
response, the golf course chose to withdraw its offer and asked that the City not make public all the
details of the City's analysis and negotiation.
No action necessary.
2. EBEWIEJ:1 LQIngEB,WQ_CJAIMLIBALLWN
Barbara Cross, City Landscape Architect, reported that last winter, the Council considered the
condition of the trial and screening from Preserve Village Mall into the neighborhood to the
southwest. Several meetings had been held since in order to resolve the issue. The Preserve
Homeowners Association had only agreed to a one-third share of the $600.00 cost to repair the
asphalt trail. Staff recommended that the cost for landscaping improvements be spat between the City
and Ryan Construction, The City's portion of all these improvements was estimated to be
approximately $3,160.00 and would be funded by cash park fees.
Cross continued that Evelyn Law, President of the Preserve Homeowners Association, called her on
April 6th to report on the Association meeting. The Association Board agreed to pay a sharp of the
cost for fixing the trail; however, it believed additional landscaping was not necessary. It stated that 1)
both homeowners were aware of the shopping center and trail when they moved in; 2) there are many
other trails in the Preserve where the individual homeowners have taken it upon themselves to landscape and fence for privacy, and to respond to this request would be setting a dangerous
precedent; and 3) they have monitored the trail and feel that although any kind of vandalism is
unfortunate, there has not been sufficient damage to either properly to warrant the expenditure.
Cross reported Ryan Construction was willing to cooperate to solve the problem, but was concerned
about the costs when the trail may ultimately be closed. They did however to split the cost of the rail
fence and 40 dwarf nine bark shrubs to help alleviate the neighbors concerns.
(16
Eden Prairie City Council Meeting April 19, 1988 Page 10
At the Parks and Recreation and Natural Resources meeting on April 18th, Larry Paumen, 9712 Clark
Circle, indicated the estimated costs seemed high and that he and Bob Humphrey's, 9365 Garrison
Way, would plant the shrubs themselves saving on contractors expenses for installing shrubs.
MOTION
Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to accept the Staff recommendation. Motion carried
unanimously.
3. LAKE RILEY CHAIN OF LAKES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Lambert reported that in mid-1986, the United States Environmental Protection Agency awarded a
grant for the Lake Riley Chain of Lakes Improvement Project. A feasibility study was conducted
thereby becoming eligible for a Clean Lakes Program Grant Application.
The major goal of the project was to improve the water quality of Lake Riley; however, the project
would include removal of rough fish on all of the lakes upstream by installing fish barriers, aerators
where needed, and biomanipulation and aeration of Lake Riley.
Staff recommended that Council authorize entering into an agreement with the Watershed District and
the City of Chanhassen for local support of this project with the condition that the City of Chanhassen
agree to acquiring the necessary public accesses upstream and to fund 50% of the ongoing aeration
and maintenance costs for Lake Riley where by the City's cost would be approximately $7,550.
MOTION
Harris moved, seconded by Bentley to authorize Staff to enter into an agreement with Watershed
District and the City of Chanhassen for local support of the clean up project under the condition that
the City of Chanhassen agree to acquire the necessary public accesses upstream and agree to
funding 50% of the ongoing aeration and maintenance costs of Lake Riley. Motion carried
unanimously.
4. PURGATORY CREEK RECREATION AREA MAJOR ACCESS
Lambert reported that since 1981 when the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Plan was originally
approved, the feasibility of the plan was studied and the proposed major access was moved several
times due to development of land or willingness of a property owner to sell land to the City for
development of the access.
He reported that the most recently approved plan was located on the property line of the Feeders and
Naegele properties. Representatives of the Feeders property have recently suggested a realignment
of Technology Drive and a modification of the major entry that would occur along the south side of the
realigned Technology Drive. The proposed design looked feasible on the plan; however, the
proposed area consists of deep peaty soils and Staff was concerned regarding the feasibility of actual
construction of an entry in that location.
Lambert stated that the property immediately south of the Flagship Athletic Club and north of the
development formerly referrea to as Castle Ridge, was another possible entry.
Staff recommended an access at both locations; however, the major access should be determined in
the near future and sufficient property acquired in order to develop the access and necessary parking
for this park.
Staff recommended that Council authorize hiring Brauer and Associates to review the feasibility of the
design proposed on Feeders site and to develop a design on the site south of Flagship for a major
entry. Staff estimated the study would take no more than six weeks and cost less than $3000.
Eden Prairie City Council Meeting April 19, 1988 Page 11
Pidcock inquired why Brauer and Associates was chosen. Lambert replied that it worked on the
original feasibility study and its knowledge of the area would eliminate a great deal of time in acquiring
background information, thereby saving time and money.
MOTION
Anderson moved, seconded by Harris to direct Staff to proceed with their recommendations for the
Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Major Access at a cost not greater than $3000. Motion carried
unanimously.
5. LAKE RILEY OPERATION POLICY
Lambert reported that at the March 7th Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
meeting, it was recommended that the Council consider banning alcohol in Riley Lake Park and install
a rope-and-buoy system across the entire lake frontage to enforce a proposal that would not allow
anyone to moor or beach a boat at Riley Lake Park.
At the March 15th meeting, the Council tabled that recommendation and directed staff to extend no
parking* signs along streets to one mile from Riley Lake Park, to restrict any vehicles with trailers from
using the overflow paring lot, and to hire additional staff at Riley Lake Park to enforce the existing
ordinances. The Council further directed Staff to begin discussion with representatives from
Chanhassen to consider a surface management ordinance on Riley Lake that would either limit the
speed allowed on the lake during certain times of the day and certain days of the week, or would limit
the size of motors allowed on boats on that lake. The Council further directed Staff to consider any
Other options that might be recommended to improve the safety of users of Riley Lake.
Lambert continued that at the meeting with the City of Chanhassen, and Riley Lake Homeowners
Association, they suggested to Staff to again consider no alcohol in the park this year. Additional
recommendations of rope-and-buoy system be put in along the frontage area of the beach. This
would restrict the mooring of boats south of the swimming beach area and eliminate dangerous
practice of water skiing in that vicinity. The City of Chanhassen has no public accrmq, and Eden
Prairie will protect the public right to access the lake.
Peterson felt that prohibiting the use of alcohol in the park would not result in no use of alcohol.
MOTION
Bentley moved, Harris seconded to approve Staff recommendations for the Lake Riley Operational
Policy for implementation this year per memorandum to Mayor and City Council dated April 13, 1988.
Motion carried unanimously.
F. Report of Director of Public Works
1. AWARD CONTRACT FOR 1988 BITUMINOUS SEAL COATING
Dietz reported to Council that bids for the bituminous seal coating were opened on April 14, 1988. A
tabulation of bids and recommendation for award were presented.
MOTION
Hams moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt Resolution No. 88-62 awarding the 1988 Bituminous
Seal Coating Contract to Allied Blacktop Co., Inc. Motion carried unanimously.
/AV
Eden Prairie City Council Meeting April 19, 1988 Page 12
2. AWARD CONTRACTS FOR 1988 STREET MATERIALS
Dietz reported to Council that bids for street materials were opened on April 14, 1988. A tabulation of
bids and recommendation for award were presented.
MOTION
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt Resolution No. 88-61 awarding Maintenance Materials
and Water Treatment Chemicals to the lowest responsible bidders as listed. Motion carried
unanimously.
G. Report of Finance Director
None
Xi. NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MUM
Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to adjourn the meeting at 11:20 PM.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MAY 3, 1988
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
7:30PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and
Patricia Pidcock.
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Asst. to
the City Manager Craig W. Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Paul, Director of
Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, Director
of Community Services Robert Lambert,
Director of Planning Chris Enger,
Recording Secretary Deb Edlund.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: All members were present.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Bentley to approve the
Agenda and Other Items of Business, as amended and published.
The following item was added to the Agenda: III.Q Approval
of Resolution No. 88-77 relating to Document Amendments
Regarding Housing Revenue Bonds for Baypointe Manor Phase II.
The following item was deleted from the Agenda: III.N
Agreement regarding Special Assessments for Construction of
Improvements to Columbine and Fountain Place with Fountain
Place Plat. The following items were moved: III.E Eden Place
Center by Prairie Entertainment Associates-moved to VI.A,
III.M Petition for Sidewalk on Boyd Avenue (Resolution No. 88-
75)-moved to VII.A, III.K Approval of Payment of NSP for
Transmission Tower Protection-moved to VII.B.
Motion carried unanimously.
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List.
B. P_AX.GBRISTI_CATHOLIC_CH.IJRCH. 2ND Reading of Ordinance #9-
83 within the Public Zoning District; Approval of Addendum
to Developer's Agreement for Pax Christi Catholic
Community; and Adoption of Resolution #88-63, Authorizing
Summary of Ordinance # 11-88 and Ordering Publication of
Said Summary. Zoning District Amendment within the Public
Zoning District on 38 acres for construction of church
COUNCIL MINUTES 2 MAY 3, 1988
addition. Location 12100 Pioneer Trail. (Ordinance #11- 88, Zoning District Amendment within Public District;
Resolution 088-63, Authorizing Summary and Publication)
C. WT _5 BUSINESS CENTER by John T. Smith. 2nd Reading of
Ordinance #12-88, Zoning District Change from I-General to
I-2 Park on 4.68 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement
for West 5 Business Center; and Adoption of Resolution #
88-64, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #12-88 and
Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 4.68 acres into 2
lots for construction of a 36,805 square foot office/
warehouse building. Location: East of Fuller Road and
Northwest of Chicago & Northwestern Railway. (Ordinance
#12-88, Re-zoning; Resolution #88-64 Authorizing Summary
and Publication)
D. THE FARM 2ND ADDITION by Countryside Investments, Inc. 2nd
Reading of Ordinance #16-88, Zoning District Change from
Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.95 acre m and from Public to R1-13.5 on 4.7 acres; Approval of Developer's AGreement for The
Farm 2nd Addition; and Adoption of Resolution 088-65,
Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #12-88 and Ordering
Publication of Said Summary. 30 acres into 17 lots and 1
outlot. Location: North of the intersection of Duck Lake
Trail and Loralee Lane. (Ordinance #16-88, Re-zoning;
Resolution #88-65, Authorizing Summary and Publication)
E. EDEN PLACE CENTER by Prairie Entertainment Associates.
2nd Reading of Ordinance #5-88 within the C-Reg-Ser
District on 6.42 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement
for Eden Place Center; and Adoption of Resolution 088-66,
Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #5-88 and Ordering
Publication of Said Summary. 6.42 acres into 1 lot for
construction of 52,000 square feet of retail and
restaurant use. Location: West of Glen Lane, south and
east of Eden Road. (Ordinance #5-88, Zoning District
Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser District; Resolution #88-
66, Authorizing Summary and Publication)
F. Final Plat Approval for Shady Oak Ridge 3rd Addition
Llocated west ot Old Shasly Oak Road and north of Rowland
Roadi Resolution Nu. 88-69
G. Final Plat Approval for Viking Drive west (located east of
U.S. 169 and South of Viking Drive) Resolution No. 88-70
H. Final Plat Approval for West 5 Business Center (located
east of Fuller Road south of State Highyay 51 Resolution
No. 88-71
I. Mastep_card and Visa Card Proposal for Community Center
J. Eden Lake Elementary Playground ProppAal
COUNCIL MINUTES 3 MAY 3, 1988
K. Approval of Payment to NSP for Transmission Tower
Protection
L. Resolution No. 88-76, Proclaiming May 2 - May 8 as
Natjonal Drinking Water Week
M. Petition for Sidewalk on Boyd Avenue (Resolution No. 88-
75)
N. lartgaellt regArAing Special Assessments for Construction
of Improvements to Columbine and Fountain Place with
Fountain Place Plat
O. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Grading Permit. for Lake Level
Controls on Rice Lake
P. City_ Clean-Up Day
Q. Approval of Resolution #88-77 relating _t_QP_Qume_ol.
Amendments Regarding Housing Revenue Bonds for Baypointe
Manor Phase II.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve
Consent Calendar as published and amended, deleting Items
N, M, and K and adding Item Q.
Bentley questioned language of Item L. Resolution No. 88-
76.
MOTIOA: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to amend
language of Resolution # 88-76 to Read: Where as water
that flows dependably... Motion carried unanimously.
Further discussion of Item L followed.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to delete Item
L from the Agenda. Motion carried unanimously.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR
MITCHELL ROAD AND RESEARCH ROAD, I.C. 52-051 (Resolution
No. 88-72)
City Manger Jullie stated that Notice of this Public
Hearing was published in the Eden Prairie News on April 21
and April 28, 1988 and sent to the owners of affected
properties.
Director of Public Works Dietz reviewed the details of the
project and the proposed method of assessment.
Dietz presented the two alternative routes proposed.
Alternative A was Mitchell Road in same through pattern as
COUNCIL MINUTES 4 MAY 3, 1988
exists today. Problems with Alternative A are traffic
patterns and the need for a wider street, thus causing
more grading and tree loss. Alternative B had two routes
connected by a short street (one new street and what would
become Mitchell Road as it runs through Red Rock Ranch).
Staff recommends Alternative B.
A handout was presented by Dietz to the Council from the
Douglas Corporation asking to have decision regarding
watermain alignment to be deferred until June. The letter
also stated concern about assessment for turn lanes which
would not benefit its property, and of the high assessment
it already absorbed for Anderson Lakes Parkway.
A second handout was presented to Council by Dietz from
Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban, representing Mason Homes,
stating its support for Alternative A.
Dietz stated that regarding road intersections, Red Rock
Ranch is not in favor of the alignment of the road as
proposed through its property.
Dietz said that if Council adopted the Resolution, bids
could be opened as early as July 15 and the project could
start in late summer 1988.
Dietz addressed the issue of renaming of Research/Mitchell
Road, stating that 3 of 5 property owners affected favor
White Oak Parkway for name of new road necessary if
Alternative B is adopted.
Dietz said that even though the cost issue was one that
was not to be discussed tonight, it was a major concern to
property owners. Affected property owners were invited to
a meeting with City Engineer Alan Gray. Staff was not
prepared for final recommendation of costs tonight.
Dietz proposed 1) Council assure property owners that
Staff would not exceed $18,000.00 in special assessments
for streets and utilities unless property was divided. 2)
City policy of deferring the assessment for utilities for
5 years or until they connect or subdivide would be
applicable. 3) Between now and fall of 1989 Staff would
review a policy, consider doing appraisals to develop a
more definitive policy.
Peterson requested clarification on road widths and if
those proposed will be adequate. Dietz replied that based
on traffic studies the high volume would be on the road
through Red Rock Ranch and felt widths were appropriate as
proposed.
Harris questioned that if the Seifert property were
developed, would a different alignment for utilities in
A2-:?)
COUNCIL MINUTES 5 MAY 3, 1988
northwest section be anticipated. Deitz answered that
interior streets would be developed through which sanitary
sewer and water would follow.
Bentley referred to letter from Dahlgren, Shardlow and
Uban regarding concern of roadway width and alignment due
to possible housing density changes.
Bentley questioned if it was necessary to deal with road
name tonight. Dietz replied it was not necessary, and
added that a public hearing is not required.
Anderson questioned traffic flow when the new middle
school opens with buses coming from all over the City. Is
this the best alignment from the western part of the City
and if street width of 32 feet can handle volume? Dietz
stated that this alignment produces a smooth flow.
Bentley commented that this is not an assessment hearing.
Actual costs can not be determined at this time.
Assessment would be based on actual cost of project if it
proceeds. Assessment hearing would be in the Fall of
1989.
Mary Jenkins, 13800 Research Road, stated objection to
name change. She had not been asked about name change.
Dietz commented that the reason Mrs. Jenkins was not asked
was because access for her property would now come off a
new street. Mrs. Jenkins stated that has not been
approved yet. Mrs. Jenkins went on to say that there were
too many cutesy names for streets now, making it difficult
for residents and police etc. to find their way around the
city.
John Sword, 8895 Mitchell Road, stated support of Mrs.
Jenkins objection to name change.
Julia Larson, 8705 Mitchell Road, questioned assessment
policy being fair. Mrs. Larson would like to see that
assessment be decreased or increased proportionately.
Randy Treville, representing Mason Homes, stated the firm
favored project, but questioned data on which traffic
study was based. Treville stated that Mason Homes
property density would be reduced approximately 56%,
therefore, the trip count will be reduced by approximately
1/3, thus eliminating need for a through roadway through
Red Rock Ranch. Treville believed Mitchell Road properly
served the area and neighbors to the south. Mason Homes is
supporting a north-south connection along the current
alignment of Mitchell Road, and a long minor roadway or
cul-de-sac through its property which could possibly be
named Red Rock Ranch Road for continuity of
Identification.
COUNCIL MINUTES 6 MAY 3, 1988
Peterson questioned if Staff was aware of proposed
development changes. Dietz replied that Staff has heard
about possible changes, but we are dealing with an
approved PUD. A collector is still necessary. Peterson
then stated that an amendment to the current PUD at a
later date could possibly change width and alignment, but
was not appropriate for discussion at this time.
Bob Lambert, 9260 Mitchell Road, stated three concerns.
1) Questioned if a pending assessment were on a property
and it was sold before final assessment, would the
property owner be responsible for an $18,000 assessment.
Council replied yes. 2) Lambert wishes to go on record
that he questions that his property will increase $18,000
in value. 3) Regarding name of road; Lambert has talked
with residents Lender and Beckman who are in favor of
White Oak Parkway. Kottke and Kraemer do not have a
preference. All five residents object to Research Road.
Virgil Seifert, 8390 Hiawatha Avenue, stated he was being
assessed twice on part of his frontage. Dietz replied
that the right dimensions will be made at final
assessment.
Leland Kottke, 9190 Mitchell Road stated his objection to
the name White Oak Parkway.
David Kraemer, 9110 Mitchell Road, stated this improvement
will not increase property value. Concerned about the
ease of access for City sewer and water because of steep
grade.
There were no further comments from the audience.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to close Public
Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 88-72 with the assessment
cap of $18,000.00 as recommended for preferred Alignment
B. Motion carried unanimously.
Bentley recommended Staff review with neighbors
possibilities for road name. Dietz replied Staff will
meet with property owners and set a hearing date.
Anderson suggested Staring Lake Parkway as a possible name
to be considered, this being descriptive of the area.
Anderson felt that White Oak Parkway seems to take away
from the area.
B. STARRING LAKE 2ND ADDITION by Red Rock Heights
Partnership. Requisition for Preliminary Platting of 8.3
acres into 13 single family lots within the R1-22
District. Location: North of County Road 4 1 between
Eicholts Addition and Starring Lake 1st Addition.
(Resolution No. 88-67, Preliminary Plat)
COUNCIL MINUTES 7 MAY 3, 1988
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson for a
continuance to next Council meeting. Motion carried
unanimously.
C. SEARS GARDEN STORE by Sears, Roebuck and Company. Request
for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment of the Eden
Prairie Center Planned Unit Development Concept Review on
87.75 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review
within the C-Regional Zoning District on 87.75 acres with
variances for exterior building material, for the
construction of a 1,000 square foot seasonal temporary
structure for an outside storage garden center. Location:
Eden Prairie Center/Sears. (Resolution # 88-68, PUD
Concept Amendment to the Overall Eden Prairie Center
Planned Unit Development Concept; Ordinance # 18-88,
Amending Ordinance #213 within the C-Regional District)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing
was sent to owners of 45 surrounding properties and
published in the April 20, 1988 issue of the Eden Prairie
News.
Jack Rittle, Operations Manager for Sears Eden Prairie
Store, proposed to have a temporary garden lot to be
installed early April and taken down the end of July. The
unit would consist of a 6-foot-high chain link fence and a
canvas enclosure approximately 1,000 square feet.
Planning Director Enger stated the Planning Commission
reviewed this item at the April 11, 1988 meeting and
recommended approval on a 6-0 vote.
Enger stated this was an amendment to the original
shopping center approval of 1973, because an outdoor
garden center was not anticipated. Staff has been
approached by others for similar outdoor facilities and
believes that this is the proper process to be established
for review.
Enger said this is a zoning amendment. A variance through
the PUD is required because of exterior building
materials. Enger reported Staff recommendations from
April 8, 1988 Staff Report.
Pidcock questioned if there was any way this could become
a permanent structure without Staff knowledge. Enger
replied that anything could happen. Pidcock asked what
safeguard could be put in place to prevent this. Enger
answered this would be written as a development agreement
and filed.
Bentley asked Mr. Rittle about not using signs or banners
etc... Mr. Rittle replied Sears would be relying on
COUNCIL MINUTES 8 MAY 3, 1988
internal promotions. Outside signs have not been used in
previous locations.
There were no further audience comments.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to close the
Public Hearing and adopt Resolution #88-68 for PUD Concept
Amendment. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve 1st
Reading of Ordinance No. 18-88. Motion carried
unanimously.
MO.TION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to direct
Staff to prepare a Supplemental Agreement to the
Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff
recommendations. Motion carried unanimously
D. TECHNOLOGY PARK PHASE Iv by Technology Park Associates.
Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on
approximately 41 acres, Planned Unit Development District
Review with variances and Zoning District Change from
Rural to 1-2 on 13 acres with shoreland variances to be
reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Preliminary Plat of
Approximately 41 acres into 1 lot and 2 outlots for
construction of 162,860 square feet of industrial use in
two buildings. Location: West of Golden Triangle Drive,
north of Nine Mile Creek, east of Smetana Lane. A public
hearing. (Resolution #88-73, PUD Concept; Ordinance 019-
88-PUD-3-88, Zoning District Change to I-2-PUD-3-88;
Resolution #88-74, Preliminary Plat)
Jullie stated that notice of this Hearing was sent to
owners of fifteen surrounding properties and published in
the April 20, 1988 issue of the Eden Prairie News.
Mike Gair, Hoyt Development, representing the proponent,
made an extensive slide and graphic presentation of the
proposal. Gair stated that Hoyt has had several meetings
with City Staff, has met with Mr. & Mrs. Ed Smetana, and
has attempted without success to meet with Frank Smetana.
Hoyt believed it was in compliance with land use/zoning,
watershed district and DNR requirements, had developed a
reasonable buffer zone, and had provided for health,
safety and welfare needs for adjoining properties. Based
on a traffic study Hoyt has had prepared, the need for
Smetana Lane does not exist. Gair concluded that a timely
decision was essential, as Hoyt already had a tenant for
approximately 20,000 square feet to be occupied in late
summer 1988.
Enger stated that Planning Commission reviewed this
proposal at its April 11, 1988 meeting and recommended on
a 6-0 vote denial of the project. This denial was based
COUNCIL MINUTES 9 MAY 3, 1988
on two issues: 1) A continuation of Smetana Lane through
the property has not been provided in any location. The
Commission believed Smetana Lane is important for traffic
flow and circulation. 2) Proper land use transition to
existing single-family homes. Properties with existing
homes would be hard to market as residential or
commercial.
Enger said with the exception of these two issues the site
planning is fine. Enger reported Staff recommendation per
an April 8, 1988 Staff report.
Lambert reported that the Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission considered this item at its April 18,
1988 meeting and voted 5-0 for approval.
Dietz stated the major issue is connecting roadways. The
need for an effective, integrated street system is
extremely important. A common road to connect the Hoyt
property and the Cherne property is best way to allow
access to properties. If a road can not be put through
the area in a location approved by the City, then the
project should be denied.
Anderson requested more information on preserving the 875-
foot contour. Enger replied the 875 level was a last
effort to provide screening from the industrial
development. A future land use and design solution was to
substitute for the 875 level, but several questions have
been left open since PUD approval in 1985.
Anderson questioned if the City will have the building and
screening that is desired for this area.
Harris questioned if Smetana Lane were continued through,
would the buildings have to be moved north. Dietz replied
it would require some relocation. Smetana Lane could be
also be rerouted between the buildings.
Harris asked Enger if the buildings were moved north if
this would accommodate the need for additional
transitioning to Smetana homes. Enger replied it would
require further review; it would seem that moving further
away would provide more opportunity for this.
Harris asked Gair what effect moving the buildings would
have on project. Gair replied a significant impact.
Peterson asked Gair about a West 76th Street connection.
Steve Hoyt replied that a West 76th Street connection is a
possibility, but a street that runs along the creek is
undesirable.
COUNCIL MINUTES 10 MAY 3, 1988
Bentley asked Hoyt to consider looking at road dedication.
Steve Hoyt felt this would have too great an impact on
project.
After lengthy discussion about the road issue, Steve Hoyt
asked Council to considered approval of Tech VII & VIII;
Hoyt would come back at a later date for approval of the
northern property, at which time the Smetana Lane issue
would be resolved.
Deitz stated three possibilities for putting road through;
south of buildings along creek, between the two buildings
or north of second building. To delay a decision on this
could cut out two of the alternatives. The issue needs to
be resolved with this project.
Pat Kostecka, 10805 Valley View Road, stated she has to
sell because of noise and no access, and would be forced
to sell for commercial use. She believed she deserved use of this road.
Frank Smetana, 7722 Smetana Lane, said there is more
concern than just transition. He fell Smetana Lane should
go through but not to Highway 18. He urged denial of this
project for four reasons; 1) Smetana Lane. 2)
Inappropriate transition. 3) 1985 PUD Agreement. 4) Impact
on the physical, financial and emotional health of the
Smetana s.
City Attorney Pauly requested that letter from Mr. Frank
Smetana become part of the record.
Bill Cherne, stated a need to find a plan that works for
all the various owners and be sensitive to Frank Smetana's
problem. If Smetana Lane were continued, it would have a
negative effect. The best alternative is to extend W.
76th Street. He suggested the three property owners get
together.
Marcella Smetana, 7730 Smetana Lane, stated she did not
want Smetana Lane to go through.
There were no further comments from the audience.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to continue
issue to next Council meeting on May 17, 1988.
Bentley requested to see at that time how access is going
to be accomplished.
Motion carried unanimously.
E. VALLEY GATE 200 by The Helle Partnership. Request for
Site Plan Review within the 1-2 Zoning District on 4.9
IJS-9
COUNCIL MINUTES 11 MAY 3, 1988
acres with variances for zero lot line to be reviewed by
square foot office/warehouse. Location: Northeast corner
of Golden Triangle Drive and West 74th Street.
Jullie stated that notice of this Public Hearing was sent
to owners of 13 surrounding properties and published in
the April 20, 1988 issue of the Eden Prairie News.
Mr. Sigmund Helle, made presentation of project. He
requested that the zero lot line request be approved.
Enger reported that the Planning Commission reviewed this
item at its April 11, 1988 meeting and recommended
approval with a unanimous vote.
There were no further comments from the audience.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to close the
Public Hearing and direct staff to prepare a Supplement to
the Development Agreement incorporating Commission and
Staff recommendations including the zero lot line request
as part of approval. Motion carried unanimously.
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to approve
the Payment of Claims Nos. 42017 - 42267.
Pidcock asked regarding Claim # 42101, if any other
haulers have been investigated.
Roll Call Vote: Anderson, Bentley, Harris, Pidcock and
Peterson voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to direct Staff
to put out bids for hauling trash from City facilities.
Motion carried unanimously.
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. Item II.E, EDEN PLACE CENTER by Prairie Entertainment
Associates.
Bentley stated that 1) Nothing was in the information
packet that indicated fulfillment of one of the
prerequisites for Second Reading approval, that a firm
agreement be in hand for a first class restaurant facility
be within the Eden Place Center. 2) Council had not
received a copy of Final Landscape plan relative to
screening. 3) Language in Developer's Agreement was not
specific, and did not state what type of restaurant this
needed to be.
060
COUNCIL MINUTES 12 MAY 3, 1988
Bentley questioned whether a traffic study was part of
PUD. What impact would this development have on
intersections in area? Bentley was concerned about sight
line distance and screening for west side loading area.
Norman Brody, representing the developer, stated that
proponent had an executed lease agreement in hand from
Ciatti's. The Final Landscape plan has been delivered,
and the proponent and Staff believed that all issues have
been worked out.
Enger stated that Staff did have a landscape plan, and
that forwarding it to Council was omitted in error. The
issues have been resolved. Regarding back side of
building: this will be covered with landscaping and
berming similar to Target Store. Regarding sight line:
sight distance is a potential problem. An access on north
would not be considered a major entrance to Center.
Regarding traffic study: traffic study was done with
original PUD of Eden Glen by BRW in 1985. Staff compared
the trip generation from this proposal to the original
PUD. This proposal did not exceed the original PUG.
Pidcock commented that she was not comfortable with this
proposal.
Peterson stated that procedurally Mr. Brody has answered
satisfactorily the Restaurant issue. Procedurally a
motion would be required to consider concern relative to
traffic inasmuch as it was not raised by the Planning
Commission or Council at the first Public Hearing.
Peterson did not feel this is appropriate to add this
issue on now to deny Second Reading.
Anderson also stated concern about traffic.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock to have
traffic problems in this area studied relative to this
project.
Enger stated that no traffic problems were indicated in
original PUD five years ago.
Peterson stated he is against the motion.
Bentley stated traffic problems do and will exist in this
area. Bentley was concerned if a strip mall was an
appropriate use for this area.
Enger stated this project compared favorably with original
PUD and BRW traffic study.
Anderson withdrew motion.
COUNCIL MINUTES 13 MAY 3, 1988
Bentley stated his hope that the developer would work with
neighboring residential properties.
Mr. Brody assured Council that he would work with various
property owners. It is developer's desire to be good
residents and produce a project the City will be proud of.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Peterson to approve
Second Reading. Motion carried unanimously.
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Item ULM, Petition for Sidewalk on Boyd Avenue
(Resolution No. 88-75)
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to notify all
residents and continue item to May 17, 1988 Council
Meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Item III.K. Approval of Payment to NSP for Transmission
Tower Protection.
Pidcock commented that she would have liked to have seen
more detail.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to approve
Item III.K. Motion carried unanimously.
C. Miscellaneous Communications.
Peterson questioned the intent of action based on
correspondence from Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc..
Jullie stated that Naegele wanted to assert its right to
go through the planning and zoning approval process.
After discussion, Peterson directed the City Manager to
have Naegele make a more specific request.
Pidcock requested status of a quarterly budget report.
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
IX. APPOINTMENTS
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
No Reports
B. Reports of City Manager
060.
COUNCIL MINUTES 14 MAY 3, 1988
No Report
C. Report of City Attorney
No Report
D. Report 01...Director of Planning
No Report
E. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Preserve Homeowners Association Trail
Lambert stated this was a no-win situation. Staff met
with Preserve Homeowners' Association. The Association did
not want to set precedent by paying for fencing or
screening, and stated its belief that property owners
EihOUld be responsible for screening. Association stated
it would be willing to close the trail if the City
authorized.
Mr. Paumen stated that he has replaced hedges twice, has
replaced broken windows and has had to repaint his house;
all at his expense. Paumen said the path is a nuisance.
Paumen would accept a split-rail fence, a cost which the
City and Ryan Construction should absorb.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to adopt
Recommendation # 3. The City would split the cost for
repairing the trail between the Preserve Association, Ryan
Construction and the City; split the cost of acquisition
of plant and fence material with Ryan Construction; and
require the property owners to plant the shrubs and
install the fence. Cost of 12" plant material is $520.00,
cost of fence is $500.00; therefore, the total City cost
is $710.00, Ryan Construction Cost is $710.00, Preserve
Association cost is $200.00, and the property owner cost
is labor for installation of fence and plants.
Mr. Humphreys stated there is no privacy. Ryan said it
would put in 4-foot trees in the beginning; now it is
compromising to 1-foot plants and a split-rail fence.
Humprhreys did not feel that adequate screening would be
provided.
Motion carried unanimously.
F. RePPIt of Director of Public Works
No Report
G. Report of Finance Director
443
COUNCIL MINUTES 15 MAY 3, 1988
1. Financial Consultants
Jullie stated that representatives of Springsted Inc. were
present, but wished to continue this item to another time.
Pidcock requested to have proposals from others along with
present consultant.
Bentley questioned why this matter was being considered.
XI. NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
The Council adjourned the meeting at 12:22 AM and went into
executive session.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
BOARD OF REVIEW
MONDAY, MAY 16, 1988
BOARD OF REVIEW MEMBERS:
BOARD OF REVIEW STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
6:30 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
President of the Board Gary D.
Peterson, Richard Anderson, George
Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia
Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie,
Assistant to the City Manager Craig
Dawson, City Assessor Steve Sinell,
and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson
ROLL CALL: All members were present.
I. RECONVENE BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING
The meeting was called to order by President of the Board Peterson.
II. APPROVAL OF BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES OF MEETING HELD THURSDAY,
APRIL 28, 1988
The following addition was made to the Minutes: page 14,
Item 1003 -- add PID number 24-116-22 22 0219.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the
Minutes of the Board of Review meeting held Thursday, April 28,
1988, as amended and published. Motion carried with Harris
abstaining.
III. REVIEW OF ITEMS CONTINUED FROM APRIL 28, 1988
City Assessor Sinell stated those items referred by the Board
at its April 28th meeting had been reviewed by the City Staff.
In order to expedite matters, Anderson suggested that the Council
consider as one motion those items on which the owners agreed with
the Staff recommendations.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to sustain the Staff
recommendations for the 1988 Estimated Market Values on the follow-
ing properties:
2. Kay & Arlen Westling - 24-116-22 34 0043 - $172,200
6. Thomas L. Swirtz - 05-116-22 14 0042 - $148,500
a6C
Board of Review Minutes 2 May 16, 1988
9. Paul Welin - 04-116-22 42 0045 - $54,000
10. Ronald L. Moeller - 25-116-22 22 0009 - $231,200
22. Lee Lobstein - 03-116-22 34 0015 - $112,000
23. Byron & Kristine Anderson - 05-116-22 24 0034 -
$94,000
24. Alvin & Mildred Bran - 10-116-22 14 0011 - $172,000
25. James Miller - 23-116-22 23 0020 - $112,800
36. Eugene Dix - 06-116-22 43 0017 - $89,200
1004. Linda & Dan MacDonald - 05-116-22 31 0064 - $135,700
1005. David W. Lee - 24-116-22 34 0019 - $94,000
1006. Daniel J. Heltness - 24-116-22 34 0020 - $94,000
1012. Bruce & Ruth Ann firmer - 24-116-22 43 0056 - $90,400
24-116-22 43 0057 - $90,400
1013. Elfering Construction - 06-116-22 33 0014 - $147,000
06-116-22 33 0077 - $71,000
06-116-22 33 0078 - $72,000
1014. Thomas & Debra Wilson - 35-116-22 21 0096 - $122,000
1015. Ronald & Leslie Ezerski - 03-116-22 41 0004 - $257,900
1016. John & Diane Hockert - 08-116-22 41 0013 - $100,600
1018. William Diers - 23-116-22 31 0003 - $112,500
1027. Elton M. Nelson - 08-116-22 41 0033 - $88,400
1028. Jeff Miller - 04-116-22 43 0047 - $110,300
Mike Flynn noted that he also agreed with the Staff recommendation
for his property.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley, to amend the motion to
include Item 28., Mike Flynn - 05-116-22 31 0016 - $95,100. Motion
to amend the motion carried unanimously.
VOTE ON THE MAIN MOTION: Motion carried unanimously.
The Council then reviewed each remaining item in turn.
1. Stan Volp - 03-116-22 42 0005 - 13252 Cardinal Creek Road
Mr. Volp asked Mr. Sinell to explain the form. Sinell ex-
plained the review appraisal conducted on Mr. Volp's property.
/266
Board of Review Minutes 3 May 16, 1988
Volp said he questioned the fairness of the appeal process as
he understood that some residents had their assessments
lowered just by making a phone call to question the amount.
Sinell said there were no reductions based on phone calls and
that review appraisals were conducted on all appellants'
properties.
Bentley said he didn't appreciate Mr. Volp's comments regard-
ing unfair treatment. He said the assessment process is done
very fairly and equitably and the purpose of this meeting is
to consider those cases where errors may have been made. He
said there is nothing in the process that indicates people
just called and got their assessments lowered. He then re-
viewed the process used for the assessment reviews.
Pidcock said she thought it was Mr. Volp's right to describe
his experience and there was no need for the Board members
to engage in a dissertation on this matter.
Peterson asked when the property was physically reviewed.
Sinell responded that it was reviewed November 11, 1987.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to sustain the
1988 Estimated Market Value on the Volp property,
PID 03-116-22 42 0005, at $260,800. Motion carried unani-
mously.
3. Mary Jane Swanson - 29-116-22 11 0001 (Primary)
29-116-22 12 0007 (Secondary)
Ms. Swanson was not at the meeting.
Sinell said it was a difficult appraisal because there were
no good comparable properties; however the comparables used
were very close in many respects. He noted that the second
property is still a legal buildable site.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to sustain the
original 1988 Estimated Market Value on the Swanson proper-
ties, PID 29-116-22 11 0001 at $200,400 and PID 29-116-22
12 0007 at $41,900. Motion carried unanimously.
4. Richard & Karen Fyock - 03-116-22 41 0005 - 13188 Cardinal
Creek Road
Mrs. Fyock asked if the appraisal was determined strictly
on sales in 1987. Sinell said the assessor found three
properties that were most comparable to their home that
had sold and adjusted for the differences in those compar-
ables.
Sinell asked Mrs. Fyock what their opinion of the value is.
Mrs. Fyock said the property value has not gone up any since
they purchased it. She said they would not have paid as much
Board of Review Minutes 4 May 16, 1988
for their home had they known about the market value in the
neighborhood and the tax structure.
Mrs. Fyock asked if homes that have not sold increase in
value. Sinell said all the properties in Cardinal Creek were
appraised for January 1988. Mrs. Fyock said another property
in their neighborhood sold for $280,000 in December, 1987, and
that was appraised at $267,000 and had the same square footage
as their home.
Peterson asked if they were saying that their house is not
worth $283,700. Mrs. Fyock said that no one is going to buy
it when there is such a steep rate of increase in the
appraisal values.
Bentley noted that the recommended value is less than the
amount they paid for the property.
Mr. Fyock said other properties in the same cul-de-sac have
not increased. Sinell said each property is considered on
its own basis when a property is revalued.
MOTION: Pidcock moved to reduce the 1988 Estimated Market
Value on the Fyock property, PID 03-116-22 41 0005 to
$270,000.
Pidcock said there was a pretty convincing case that there
were some comparables not used that were right next door to
them. She said she knew from first-hand knowledge that
Cardinal Creek properties have not been selling at what
they previously sold for; therefore she thought that amount
would be fair.
Harris said she didn't think we know what the fair market
value is and she didn't feel prepared to set a value tonight.
MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
MOTION: Anderson moved to set the 1988 Estimated Market
Value on the Fyock property, PID 03-116-22 41 0005 at
$285,000.
Pidcock noted the original EMV was $283,700.
ANDERSON WITHDREW THE MOTION.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to reduce the
1988 Estimated Market Value on the Fyock property,
PID 03-116-22 41 0005 to $277,000.
Harris said this splits the difference between $283,700 and
$270,000.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously.
Board of Review Minutes 5 May 16, 1988
5. Chi Won Sohn - 23-116-22 21 0020 - 8735 Darnel Road
Mr. Sohn was not present at the meeting.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to sustain the
1988 Estimated Market Value on the Sohn property, PID 23-116-
22 21 0020 at $109,600. Motion carried unanimously.
12. Timothy Dunphy - 05-116-22 33 0031 - 17300 Peterborg Road
Mr. Dunphy was not present at the meeting.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to reduce the
1988 Estimated Market Value on the Dunphy property, PID
05-116-22 33 0031 to $104,700. Motion carried unanimously.
14. Raymond Rice - 17-116-22 24 0015 - 8010 Island Road
Mr. Rice distributed some additional data regarding his
review appraisal. He said his home was 73% completed on
December 31, 1986 while the assessor says it was 62% com-
pleted at that time. He said he protested the use of
comparables from Olympic Hills as he did not think his area
(Timber Lakes) was comparable to that area.
Anderson asked if the property was on lakeshore and, if it
was, how many of the homes Mr. Rice used as comparables
are on lakeshore. Rice said one of the homes down from him
is on lakeshore and has been on the market for about a year.
He said another one that is on the lakeshore is also not
selling.
Anderson then asked if he was on the wooded point. Rice said
he was on the south side of the point. Anderson asked if Mr.
Rice thought that was not a unique lot that would raise the
value of his property. Rice said he could not deny that it
was a beautiful lot. Rice said his point was that the house
was 73% complete, not 62% at the time of the original valua-
tion. He said he would estimate the home was worth around
$300,000.
Bentley asked if he had paid $316,000 for the lot and proper-
ty. Rice said the actual cost of the package was $300,000 but he would stand by $316,000.
Based on the area and the location of the hou;se, Bentley said
he thought of the house, property values have appreciated
since Mr. Rice moved in. He said he had added an amount of
increase to arrive at a figure in the $325,000 range. He said
he would like to have seen some comparables that were somewhat
closer to the affected property.
Rice said the highest sale in Weston Bay was $220,000; how-ever, the Board had instructed the assessor to go back in the
area and come up with comparables.
Board of Review Minutes 6 May 16, 1988
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to reduce the
1988 Estimated Market Value on the Rice property, PID 17-116-
22 24 0015 to $325,000. Motion carried unanimously.
15. Larry Olson - 08-116-22 14 0050 - 7351 Walnut Court
Mr. Olson was not present at the meeting.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to sustain the
1988 Estimated Market Value on the Olson property, PID 08-
116-22 14 0050 at $120,100. Motion carried unanimously.
17. Ronald E. Neher - 04-116-22 43 0081 - 14860 Ironwood Court
Mr. Neher said the last time he was here he had not gone
through the comparables process to establish the value of
his home. Comparables not withstanding, he said he still
feels the house is overvalued at $172,100.
Sinell asked if Neher had a realtor appraise his home. Neher
said he had not.
Peterson said the two comparable values are very close and
would seem to support the estimated value. Neher said that
at the starting point of the sales price, his home would be
less because his original selling price was lower.
Sinell asked if there was some duress on the part of the
seller to sell Mr. Neher's property. Neher said the seller
had already moved out of town.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to sustain the
1988 Estimated Market Value on the Neher property, PID 04-
116-22 43 0081 at $172,100. Motion carried unanimously.
18. Douglas Olsen - 21-116-22 42 0008 - 9030 Staring Lane W.
Mr. Olsen said the appraiser was out to look at his property
and told him before the comparables were done he thought the
value was $68,000. Olsen said he told the appraiser he would
like to see the comparable study. He said the comparables
indicated a value of $81,300. Olsen said his house is listed
as being built in 1967 when it was actually built in 1961.
Sinell said, based in the error in the age of the house, he
calculated that the value should be $5,000 lower.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Bentley, to reduce the
1988 Estimated Market Value on the Olsen property, PID 21-
116-22 42 0008 to $72,900. Motion carried unanimously.
19. Bruce Marzolf - 08-116-22 33 0018 - 7680 Atherton Way
peterson said Mrs. Marzolf had phoned to say that neither
of them could be present. He said the Marzolfs had an
appraisal because they are considering selling their home.
1,296
Board of Review Minutes 7 May 16, 1988
The appraisal indicated a value $7,000 less than the
Estimated Market Value.
Sinell noted that the realtor appraisal showed three compar-
ables that ranged from $88,700 to $98,700. Pidcock asked
if he agreed with that appraisal. Sinell said it is a
market analysis, not an appraisal.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to reduce the
1988 Estimated Market Value on the Marzolf property, PID
08-116-22 33 0018 to $92,300. Motion carried unanimously.
20. Russell & Sandra Stephens - 05-116-22 41 0052 - 16029
Baywood Lane
The Stephens were not present at the meeting.
Peterson asked what value the Stephens were suggesting.
Sinell said their suggested market value was $192,500.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to sustain
the 1988 Estimated Market Value on the Stephens property,
PID 05-116-22 41 0052 at $209,500. Motion carried
unanimously.
26. William Hargens - 21-116-22 42 0010 - 9060 Staring Lane W.
Mr. Hargens was not present at the meeting.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to sustain
the 1988 Estimated Market Value of the Hargens property,
PID 21-116-22 42 0010 at $103,400. Motion carried unani-
mously.
At this point a member of the audience requested that the Board
consider the appeals of those who were present in the audience
before the other appeals. The Board agreed and considered the
remaining appeals in that manner.
29. Dean & Kathryn Johnson - 24-116-22 32 0009 - 9170 Flyway
Circle
Mrs. Johnson referred to her letter of May 16th which out-
lined the reasons why they are appealing their valuation.
She said she didn't believe they could get $204,000 for
their home and she didn't think the comparables used were
appropriate. She said she chose her own comparables, five of
which were on her own block, and compared 1988 market values
to square footage for her chosen comparables. She said all
of her neighbors have lower market values than hers.
Sinell said her comparables were not sold properties and
she had assumed that all the houses were equal except for
size.
0 `)I
Board of Review Minutes 8 May 16, 1988
Harris asked what the market value represented. Mrs.
Johnson said it is the value in the books at the assessing
office, so it should be the current market value.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to reduce
the 1988 Estimated Market Value on the Johnson property,
PID 24-116-22 32 0009 to $196,900. Motion carried unani-
mously.
31. John Swanson - 06-116-22 41 0024 - 6626 Boyd Ave.
Mr. Swanson said his EMV as of January 1, 1988 was $195,000
and that has been reduced to $182,000 after the review
appraisal and a reduction for items that have not been
completed. He reviewed a comparison he had completed
of houses in the area, which he reviewed for the Board.
He noted that his is the largest house in the neighborhood.
Sinell said the comparables used in the assessor's review
were all in the neighborhood and most of them required only
minor adjustments. He said the comparables supported the
original appraisal and that most of the sales in the
neighborhood were over $150,000.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris, to reduce the
1988 Estimated Market Value of the Swanson property, PID
06-116-22 41 0024 to $182,000. Motion carried unanimously.
37. Gary Reynolds - 05-116-22 43 0016 - 16630 Baywood Terrace
Mr. Reynolds said he thought we should be comparing the
Estimated Market Values since his home has not sold and
there is no actual sales value for the property
Peterson asked him if he meant he would like to compare the
Estimated Market Value of the comparables at the time of
sale. Reynolds said he thought that was a more equitable
way of comparing the properties.
Bentley said there are standard, conventional means of doing
the assessment process and he would prefer to not deviate
from those means.
Peterson said the City's process follows the instructions
from the State and the County. Reynolds said that none of
the comparable properties have a value of 100% of the sales
price. Peterson noted that many properties do have such a
value with some over and some under that figure. Peterson
said Mr. Reynolds could take his philosophy to the County
level and try to persuade them to change their methods.
Reynolds said in that case he would then use gross square
footage, which would produce a price per square foot.
He said his property figures out to $98.53 per square foot
while the comparables' square footage averages $78.80. He
Board of Review Minutes 9 May 16, 1988
said he would like to know why there is such a large
variation.
Bentley said he believed you can't take one aspect of the
valuation process and use that for the basis of determining
whether one property is higher in value. He noted that the
size of the properties has been discounted one way or
another on the sales comparison study.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to sustain the
1988 Estimated Market Value on the Reynolds property, PID
05-116-22 43 0016 at $128,100. Motion carried unanimously.
1023. Michael McNamara - 24-116-22 43 0038 - 10260 & 10270 Tarn Circle
Mr. McNamara said he had an appraisal done by Edina Realty
for his own taxes that was $164,000. He said he had tried to sell it and another realtor told him he would be lucky
to get $140,000. He said the assessor told him the review
appraisal was at $167,000 and he did not agree with that
amount.
Sinell said the assessor used a comparable on the same
street to arrive at his review appraisal although the
comparables were sold as single units rather than one
large unit as Mr. McNamara requires.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to reduce
the 1988 Estimated Market Value on the McNamara property,
PID 24-116-22 43 0038 to $167,000. Motion carried unani-
mously.
1024. Carol Burnett - 26-116-22 41 0033 - 9940 Bennett Place
Ms. Burnett said her valuation jumped $10,000 in one year and she didn't understand how that could be since the
house is not finished, there is no sewer and water, and
many trees were removed for the road. In addition there
are no improvements at all to the house.
Peterson asked if the increase was due to increased land
value. Sinell said the 1987 value was $130,700 while 1988
is $136,100. He said the increased value is due to infla-
tion and a lot of the value is in the land. He said the area
is undergoing changes and the property is surrounded by
developments. He said the assessor was also directed to
look at the highest and best use of the property to see
whether the house contributed to the value. The assessor's
conclusion was that the house does contribute to the value.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris, to reduce the
1988 Estimated Market Value on the Burnett property, PID
26-116-22 41 0033, to $132,700. Motion carried unanimously.
Board of Review Minutes 10 May 16, 1988
At this point President of the Board Peterson turned over the
chair to Board Member Bentley.
1026. Gary Ernst - 21-116-22 22 0013 - 15851 Summit Drive
Mr. Ernst said he is in an area where there is no sewer and
water and where there are very few two story homes. He
noted that all three comparables are in a different area and
he thought they were not very comparable since there were
too many things to adjust for. He said a comparable in
his neighborhood sold in 1986 and he didn't understand why
that couldn't be used since that was a better comparable.
President of the Board Peterson resumed the chair at this
point.
Sinell asked Mr. Ernst what he thought the house was worth.
Ernst said he thought it was worth about $135,000 since it
was built for $120,000 including the lot. He said he had put
on a deck and finished the basement since purchasing the
property.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to reduce the
1988 Estimated Market Value on the Ernst property, PID
21-116-22 22 0013, to $140,000. Motion carried unanimously.
1029. Robert T. Callan - 24-116-22 31 0017 - 9051 High Point
Circle
Mr. Callan said he thought he could sell his property for
$128,000. He objected to the comparables used because of
the square footage and the quality of construction.
Bentley said he thought the market comparison was valid.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to sustain
the 1988 Estimated Market Value on the Callan property,
PID 24-116-22 31 0017, at $133,200. Motion carried unani-
mously.
38. Otto Halstenson - 23-116-22 14 0031 - 8965 Preserve Blvd.
38a. Ermin Windschill- 23-116-22 14 0032 - 8967 Preserve Blvd.
Mr. Halstenson was not present at the meeting nor was
Mr. Windschill.
Bentley said he had a hard time with the increase suggested
by the assessor after the review appraisal. Sinell noted
that the second unit had just been sold.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to sustain
the 1988 Estimated Market Value on the Halstenson property,
RID 23-116-22 14 0031 at $157,200 and on the Windschill
property, PID 23-116-22 14 9032 at $140,900. Motion carried
unanimously.
Board of Review Minutes 11 May 16, 1988
1017. Michael W. Dunn - 23-116-22 42 0062 - 9044 Preserve Blvd.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
t
h
e
1988 Estimated Market Value on the Dunn prope
r
t
y
,
P
I
D
23-116-22 42 0062 to $210,000. Motion carried unanimously.
1022. Northwood Gas Co., Inc. - 03-116-22 22 0019
03-116-22 22 0021
03-116-22 22 0022
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson,
t
o
s
u
s
t
a
i
n
the 1988 Estimated Market Value of the Northwo
o
d
G
a
s
C
o
.
,
Inc. properties, PIDs 03-116-22 22 0019, 03-11
6
-
2
2
2
2
0
0
2
1
,
03-116-22 22 0022 at $800, $76,000, and $57,500, respec- tively. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley,
t
o
a
c
c
e
p
t
t
h
e
assessors' recommendations for the 1988 Estim
a
t
e
d
M
a
r
k
e
t
V
a
l
u
e
on the following properties:
27. Andrew W. and Susan G. Wolf - 23-116-22 24
0078 - $59,400
30. Michael Sutton - 26-116-22 14 0018 -
$45,000
10-116-22 21 0001 - $32,500
10-116-22 21 0002 - $33,500
32. William & Wanda Carpenter - 04-116-22 21 00
1
4
- $103,700
33. Lee Garber - 04-116-22 43 0050 - $128,800
35. Bihari Desai - 17-116-22 12 0058 - $72,900
1001. Donald Paton - 17-116-22 13 0026 - $95,300
1002. Mark Peterka - 23-116-22 42 0063 - $262,700
1003. Bruce Eliason - 25-116-22 23 0022 - $248,900
24-116-22 22 0219 - $56,000
1007. Donald Sabinske - 08-116-22 33
0010 - $116,300
1019. David & Jeanne Mooty - 03-116-22 31
0003 - $309,100
1020. Nancy & Jeff Lukens - 04-116-22 44
0007 - $221,400
1021. EdTed Properties - 01-116-22 24
0029 - $193,000
Motion carried unanimously.
IV. OTHER BUSINESS
There was none.
1.9,7S
Board of Review Minutes 12 May 16, 1988
V. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 88-87, ACCEPTING THE 1988 ASSESSMENT
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris, to adopt Resolution
No. 88-87, accepting the 1988 assessments. Motion carried
unanimously.
Bentley said he wanted to compliment Mr. Sinell and his staff
on the excellent job they did on the 1988 appraisal process.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjourn the
meeting at 10:05 PM. Motion carried unanimously.
1Z16,
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for
the licens0 activity.
at Solie
Licensing
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
June 21, 1988
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.)
HEATING & VENTILATING
Maertens-Brenny Construction Co. T.G.S. Mechanical, Inc.
Stuart Corporation
David Wayne Construction
GAS FITTER
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY)
T.G.S.Mechanical, Inc.
L. Cramer Company, Inc.
Denco Properties, Inc. PLUMBING
Ray Erickson Construction
Pearson Construction
Todora Plumbing
Petruska Construction
Redfield Corporation
Rochel Bros., Inc. Water Softner
Allan Thomas Homes, Inc.
Robert B. Hill Company
TYPE B FOOD
Mr. Movies #26
1,9:1)
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, RecreOtionANatural Resources
Sandy Werts, Recreation Supervisc&
May 31, 1988
Piano Quotes
Recently, four of the Seniors went shopping for a piano for the
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
.
As you know, the current piano sustained heavy damage durin
g
t
h
e
f
l
o
o
d
i
n
July 1987. A piano technician looked at the piano in March and estimated
$800 to repair it. A copy of the estimate is attached.
The Seniors paid approximately $400 for it when it they purchased it from
o
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
r
members. The technician felt it was worth $700 when in good con
d
i
t
i
o
n
.
A copy of the Senior's findings is attached. They recommend pu
r
c
h
a
s
i
n
g
a
n
e
w
console piano at Bodines for $1,588. Crane Bodine, owner of
B
o
d
i
n
e
'
s
,
t
o
l
d
the Seniors that he would be willing to offer them something
f
o
r
t
h
e
S
T
A
R
C
K
piano.
Staff would recommend the purchase of a new console from Bodi
n
e
s
.
A
c
o
n
s
o
l
e
has longer strings, has a different hammer action, holds a tu
n
e
b
e
t
t
e
r
,
a
n
d
has better sound than a spinet. Most used pianos available are
s
p
i
n
e
t
s
.
The new console has a 15 year warranty. This covers defects of
w
o
r
k
m
a
n
s
h
i
p
o
n
materials. For example, sticky keys and broken strings.
For the price, this piano appears to be a worthwhile, long-term
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
the Senior Center.
M77
Cm•SCi. SAD 0
PISEPAIO
vs. D °Ds I
COLLEC -
OS ACCT. .05: I SET L
PRICE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
Kysilko Piano Service
652 Como Ave.
St. Paul, MN 55103
(612) 487-3395
368973
OSTE
O UR SDTE .ORMNE OR . Skti, ilt 4 . / 9_/9 (FJ'
SOLD TO Cf... .7
ADDRESS 7‘ ea
SHIP TO feet..., P-,--"-;., 4.4, .5-5— 3 VI/
ADDRESS Aa , e.,,e,,,,,, ....4. c„........
SDLO eV I CAE- I COO.
I ODA.:TITY
I
!
3 I ieLeta4,-,
• 5
/67 ) i'fP 3-1 c _
7
•
. 9
• 10
cf. gg -66 - Y.?
•
12
13
14
All claims and returned goods MUS7 be accompanied by this Dill.
. RECEIVED DELIVERED
ET
DSAvLINE EDWAS SSSSE DUPLICATE - SUSS T.I.,Cati USA
2
KYSILKO PIANO SERVICE
Shirley J. Kysilko
652 Como Avenue Thomas F. Kysilko
St. Paul, MN 55103
(612) 487-3395
March 9, 1988
Sandy Werts
City of Eden Prarie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prarie, MN 55344
Dear Sandy,
Thank you for having me exagine the piano at the Eden Prarie
Senior Center. As we discussed, the piano was fairly heavily
damaged by the July flooding, although most of the damage is in
the form of loosened glue joints. The piano could be repaired,
although it might be better to replace the piano since the piano
was worth about what the repairs would cost.
Enclosed is my estimate of what needs to be done to the piano
to repair the damage sustained in the flooding and how much It
would cost. If you have any questions or need more details, please
give me a call.
Sincerely,
1")
KYSILKO PIANO SERVICE
Shirley J. Kysilko
( Thomas F. Kysilko 652 Como Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55103
(612) 487-3395
March 9, 1988
Estimate for repair of water damage sustaine
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
J
u
l
y
f
l
o
o
d
to P.A.Starck upright piano, serial ntmber 120
1
6
4
,
o
w
n
e
d
b
y
E
d
e
n
Prarie Senior Center.
reglue loose areas of soundboard around rim
reglue loose ribs on soundboard
repair and reglue bass bridge
reglue loose beams
reglue toes
reglue sides of case
reglue loose veneer
repair or replace bottom board
replace rusted bass strings
clean slight corrosion from treble wire
clean or replace rusted action parts
rebus b keys
clean off mildew inside piano and action
estimated total cost
MAY 25. 1988
REPORT TO SANDY WERTZ
FROM: OLIVE LARSON. BERNICE SANDNESS, PINK
Y
A
N
D
A
D
E
L
I
N
E
B
R
A
M
W
E
L
L
RE: PIANO FOR SENIOR CENTER - EDEN PRAIRI
E
ON TUESDAY. MAY 24. 1988 WE VISITED THE FOLLOWING PIANO DEALER
S
AND RECEIVED INFORMATION ON THE FOLLOWING
N
A
M
E
D
P
I
A
N
O
S
:
THE WALDO FAMILY COMPANY, INC.. 6630 LYNDALE AVE. SO ., RICHFIELD
WE DID NOT SEE ANY CONSOLES NEW OR USED - IN OUR PRICE RANGE.
WE LOOKED AT ONE USED KIMBALL SPINET
W
H
I
C
H
H
A
D
N
O
T
B
E
E
N
T
U
N
E
D
A
N
D
APPEARED TO BE IN MEDIOCRE CONDITION
-
P
R
I
C
E
D
A
T
$
8
9
5
.
0
0
.
THE DEALER DID NOT SEEM TO BE AGREEAB
L
E
T
O
A
T
R
A
D
E
-
I
N
O
F
T
H
E
STARCK PIANO THE SENIOR CENTER NOW HA
S
.
BODINES KEYBOARD WAREHOUSE - HIGHWAY 100 AND CEDAR LAKE ROAD
ST. LOUIS PARK
WE SAW A CABLE SPINET (USED) APPROX.
1
5
Y
E
A
R
S
O
L
D
-
L
I
G
H
T
W
A
L
N
U
T
FINISH - IN FAIRLY GOOD CONDITION - H
A
S
A
S
P
R
U
C
E
W
O
O
D
S
O
U
N
D
I
N
G
BOARD. PRICED AT $1388.00. THIS PIAN
O
H
A
S
A
1
Y
E
A
R
W
A
R
R
A
N
T
Y
.
(NOTE: A SPINET HAS SHORTER STRINGS T
H
A
N
A
C
O
N
S
O
L
E
O
R
U
P
R
I
G
H
T
PIANO. SO THE HAMMER ACTION IS DIFFERENT.)
WE SAW A NEW CONSOLE MADE FOR BODINE
S
B
Y
J
A
S
P
E
R
I
N
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
I
N
INDIANA. A PIANO MANUFACTURER OWNED
B
Y
T
H
E
K
I
M
B
A
L
L
P
I
A
N
O
C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
.
IT IS AVAILABLE IN FINISHES OF PECAN.
W
A
L
N
U
T
.
O
A
K
A
N
D
M
A
H
O
G
A
N
Y
.
THE PIANO WE LOOKED AT WAS OAK FINIS
H
.
IT APPEARED TO BE AN EXCELLENT PIANO PRICED AT $1588.00.
ALONG WITH THE YOUNG MAN WHO TALKED
T
O
U
S
-
W
E
A
L
S
O
T
A
L
K
E
D
T
O
CRANE BODINE. THE OWNER OF BODINES.
W
H
O
T
O
L
D
U
S
H
E
W
O
U
L
D
B
E
V
E
R
Y
WILLING TO NEGOTIATE A TRADE FOR THE
S
T
A
R
C
K
P
I
A
N
O
A
N
D
O
F
F
E
R
U
S
A
GOOD PRICE ON THIS CONSOLE. THE NEW
P
I
A
N
O
H
A
S
A
1
5
Y
E
A
R
W
A
R
R
A
N
T
Y
.
SCHMITT MUSIC CENTER - RIDGEDALE
WE SAW A NEW RUDOLPH WURLITZER 42"
C
O
N
S
O
L
E
P
I
A
N
O
(
O
A
K
)
.
C
O
M
E
S
IN 3 OTHER FINISHES. PRICED AT $1995
.
0
0
W
I
T
H
A
1
0
Y
E
A
R
W
A
R
R
A
N
T
Y
.
WE SAW A HARRISON CONSOLE MADE BY JAS
P
E
R
I
N
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
O
F
I
N
D
I
A
N
A
(KIMBALL) PRICED AT $1599.00. ONLY A
V
A
I
L
A
B
L
E
I
N
T
H
E
W
A
L
N
U
T
F
I
N
I
S
H
.
THE SALESPERSON INDICATED SHE WOULD
B
E
W
I
L
L
I
N
G
T
O
C
O
M
E
T
O
T
H
E
SENIOR CENTER TO LOOK AT THE STARCK.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: WE APPRECI
A
T
E
D
T
H
E
A
T
T
I
T
U
D
E
O
F
T
H
E
SALES PEOPLE AT BODINES AND WERE VERY
I
N
T
E
R
E
S
T
E
D
I
N
T
H
E
N
E
W
CONSOLE PIANO THEY OFFERED AT $1588.0
0
-
A
N
D
T
H
E
O
P
P
O
R
T
U
N
I
T
Y
T
O
NEGOTIATE TRADE AND PRICE.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
THRU:
Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Stuart A. Fox, Environmental Services Manager gc'.
DATE:
June 14, 1988
SUBJECT: Relocation Settlement Claim for Clarence & Lorraine Jank
e
In order to bring the Mayor and City Council up to date reg
a
r
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
relocation assistance claim of Clarence and Lorraine Janke, forme
r
l
y
o
f
8
5
1
5
Timber Trail, Eden Prairie, MN, for $3,472.42, I offer the followi
n
g
s
u
m
m
a
r
y
:
April 1982 - Following settlement of a lawsuit with the City of Ed
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
,
the Janke's were contacted and the process of calculating
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
assistance and moving expense compensation was initiated.
May 1983 - The Janke's were ready to move to their new re
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
i
n
Minnetrista. Based on actual moving expenses, they were paid $3,28
4
t
o
c
o
v
e
r
their moving costs.
June 1983 - After numerous discussions with the Janke's, a Replacem
e
n
t
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
Payment figure of $1,006 was calculated based on information they s
u
p
p
l
i
e
d
.
August 1983 - The City is notified that an attorney, Allan Lamk
i
n
,
i
s
n
o
w
representing the Janke's and feels that they should get more
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
compensation.
September 1983 - A Replacement Housing Payment claim for $29,
3
6
2
.
7
0
i
s
submitted by the Janke's attorney.
September 1983 - Based on the information submitted by the Janke's
a
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
claim form is prepared for $1,306, along with a letter of ex
p
l
a
n
a
t
i
o
n
explaining the calculations. This letter was sent by Carl Jullie
t
o
J
a
n
k
e
'
s
attorney.
November 1983 - An appeals hearing is held at City Hall to reac
h
a
f
i
n
a
l
settlement. Information is submitted by the Janke's, their attorney Mr.
Lamkin, as well as by myself. Questions were answered with the technical
assistance of John Connors from HUD.
The outcome of the appeals hearing was to offer the Janke'
s
$
1
,
3
0
6
a
s
calculated in September.
December 1983 - I received inquiries from Senator Boschwitz's of
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
t
w
o
other attorneys related to the "final offer" made by the C
i
t
y
.
A
f
t
e
r
discussing the issues with these individuals nothing was done or r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
.
February 1988 - A letter is received from an attorney at the Minn
e
a
p
o
l
i
s
A
g
e
and Opportunity Center who is now representing the Janke's indicati
n
g
t
h
e
y
a
r
e
now willing to settle for $15,000 in Replacement Housing Costs.
Since that letter in February
t
h
e
r
e
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
l
e
t
t
e
r
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
through Rick Rosow explainin
g
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
.
O
n
M
a
y
1
9
,
1
9
8
8
,
a
l
e
t
t
e
r
(attached) was received redu
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
c
l
a
i
m
a
m
o
u
n
t
t
o
$
3
,
4
7
2
.
T
h
e
t
h
r
u
s
t
o
f
their (Janke's) argument is
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
y
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
c
o
m
p
e
n
s
a
t
e
d
f
o
r
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
interest costs, although, th
e
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
c
o
s
t
s
w
e
r
e
o
n
t
h
e
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
o
f
l
a
n
d
rather than because of a mort
g
a
g
e
o
n
a
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
(
h
o
m
e
)
.
RECOMMENDATION:
This matter has dragged on
f
o
r
o
v
e
r
5
y
e
a
r
s
a
n
d
r
a
t
h
e
r
t
h
a
n
p
r
o
l
o
n
g
i
t
further, I recommend that we
o
f
f
e
r
a
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
o
f
$
3
,
4
7
2
.
4
2
to the Janke's in an effort
t
o
s
e
t
t
l
e
t
h
i
s
m
a
t
t
e
r
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
s
t
a
f
f
expense or possible court cost
s
.
SAF:md
"BECAUSE WE CARE"
MINNEAPOLIS ACE AND OPPORTUNITY CENTER
1801 NICOLLET AVENUE SOUTH / MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5
5
4
0
3
/
6
1
2
-
8
6
3
-
1
0
0
0
Daphne H. Krause, President
May 19, 1988
Richard F. Rosow
Lang, Pauly & Gregerson, Ltd.
230 Suburban National Bank
300 Prairie Center Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Re: Clarence and Lorraine Janke
Dear Mr. Rosow:
The Jankes have authorized me to make a final settlement offer
b
e
f
o
r
e
pursuing this matter in State court. The Jankes dispute the co
m
p
u
t
a
-
tion made by the City of Eden Prairie. They are most upset by
t
h
e
determination that they are entitled to no compensation for inc
r
e
a
s
e
d
interest costs. The report of the Committee of Public Works ma
k
e
s
i
t
clear that the intent of the drafters was to compensate displ
a
c
e
d
homeowners for the additional interest they incurred due to t
h
e
i
r
displacement. Although the Act does not specifically state t
h
a
t
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
payments on a lot are included, the regulations and the repor
t
o
f
t
h
e
Committee of Public Works do state that new construction is c
o
v
e
r
e
d
.
The fact that the Jankes were required to take out a second mortgag
e
on their previous house instead of mortgaging the lot prior t
o
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
-
tion should not prevent them from being compensated for the a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
interest they incurred.
The City's determination that no increased interest costs shou
l
d
b
e
allowed appears to be not only erroneous, but also a very hars
h
a
n
d
unfair interpretation of the law. I will acknowledge, however
,
t
h
a
t
the City could argue that the Jankes should only be compensate
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
additional interest attributable to the purchase of a lot sim
i
l
a
r
i
n
s
i
z
e
to the lot their previous house was built on. Their old lot w
a
s
1
.
8
a
c
r
e
s
.
Their new lot is 13.5 acres. Their total increased mortgage i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
c
o
s
t
was $8,852.01. The fractional amount attributable to a 1.8 ac
r
e
l
o
t
i
s
$1,179.97.
-AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER-
Richard F. Rosow
Re: Clarence and Lorraine Janke
May 19, 1988
Page two
The Jahkes are willing to settle this matter for the $1,306.00 o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
l
y
awarded plus $1,179.97 for increased interest cost, plus interes
t
o
n
t
h
e
total at the legal rates of interest. Calculating the interest
o
n
$2,485.97 from September 16, 1983 to May 31, 1988 at the rate of
8
7
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
for 1983, 1986, 1987 and 1988, and at the rate of 9% interest fo
r
1
9
8
4
a
n
d
1985, results in an interest total of $986.45. The total settlem
e
n
t
f
i
g
u
r
e
computed to May 31, 1988, then would be $3,472.42.
This is obviously a very small annunt compared to what the Jan
k
e
s
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
l
y
requested and compared to what they would seek in Court. I tru
s
t
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
City will find this to be a reasonable offer. As low as this settlement offer is, the Jankes are unwilling to consider any lower counte
r
o
f
f
e
r
.
I look forward to hearing from you that the City will settle th
i
s
m
a
t
t
e
r
on these terms.
laVo
Very truly yours,
meson
Attorney
M.A.O.
1801 Nicollet Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403
863-1085
JA:cl
AGREEMENT REGARDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
THIS IS AN AGREEMENT MADE THIS DAY OF JUNE, 1988, between the City
of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation, (the "City") an
d
C
r
e
e
k
K
n
o
l
l
s
,
A
Limited Partnership (the "Owner").
A. The Owner holds legal and equitable title to property des
c
r
i
b
e
d
a
s
Outlot I, Bluffs East Fourth Addition, Hennepin County
,
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
,
a
n
d
Outlots B, E and G, Creek Knolls, Hennepin County, Minnesot
a
,
w
h
i
c
h
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
is the subject of this Agreement and is hereinafter referred
t
o
a
s
the "Property".
B. The Owner desires to develop the Property in such a man
n
e
r
t
h
a
t
will require the reconstruction and widening of Bluf
f
R
o
a
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
a
n
d
abuting the Property and the installation of concrete cur
b
a
n
d
g
u
t
t
e
r
,
s
t
o
r
m
sewer, sanitary sewer and watermain (all of which is herea
f
t
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
t
o
a
s
the "Improvements").
C. The parties hereto desire to enter into an Agreement conc
e
r
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
financing of the construction of the Improvements all of w
h
i
c
h
w
i
l
l
i
n
u
r
e
t
o
the benefit of the Property.
AGREEMENTS
IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows:
1. The Owner consents to the levying of assessments aga
i
n
s
t
t
h
e
Property for the construction of the Improvements.
lp21`)
Page -2-
2. The Owner acknowledges that the Improvements referred to herein are
part of a construction project involving Bluff Road as it passes the Property
as well as other land. The City will have prepared a Feasibility Report which
report will show the proposed costs to be assessed against the Property. The
actual cost to be assessed against the Property may differ from the amount
shown in the Feasibility Report when the actual cost of construction is
known. A pro rata share of the total cost of construction for the entire
"construction project" shall be assigned to the Property in the same manner
as is done in the Feasibility Report.
3. The cost to be assessed against the Property for the construction
of the Improvements will be the cost to reconstruct and widen Bluff Road as a
residential collector street, including concrete curb and gutter and all
utilities referred to above in Paragraph "B". For purposes of determining
the amount of the assessment, the cost of the Improvements shall include, in
addition to actual construction costs, the administrative, interest and
engineering costs and fees incurred or paid by the City in relationship to
construction of the Improvements.
4. The City's assessment records for the Property will show the
asscssment as a "pending assessment" until levied.
5. The Owner waives notice of any assessment hearing to be held at ,
which hearing or hearings the assessment is to be considered by the City
Council and therefter approved and levied.
Gary D. Peterson
Its Mayor
By
allace -H. Hustid
General Partner
BY:
Page -3-
6. The Owner concurs that the benefit to the Property by virture of
the Improvements to be constructed exceeds the amount of the assessment to be
levied against the Property. The Owner waives all rights by virtue of
Minnesota Statute 429.081 or otherwise to challenge the amount or validity of
the assessments, or the procedures used by the City in apportioning the
assessments and hereby releases the City, its officers, agents and employees
from any and all liability related to or arising out of the imposition or
levying of the assessments.
Creek Knolls
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
A Limited Partnership
A Minnesota Municipal Corporation
BY:
Carl J. Jullie
Its City Manager
0,79
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this rf day of
, 1988, by
40JCVAL
ItUktiAtr. Vied-cr/tb, . the
of Creek Knolls, A Limited Partnership,
Page -4-
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of
, 1988, by Gary D. Peterson, the Mayor and Carl J. Jullie, th
e
City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municip
a
l
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
,
on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF
on behalf of the partnership.
--MtNNISOIA
KATE KARNAS
PuRIC
1
FizNNEPIN COUNTY
ILA ,ointr,mion exp.. Apr. 6, 1989
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COWDY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #83-128
A FE92LUTION 3IVIN3 FINPL PFFROVAL TO 111E 1987
GEI\13:AL. ilkiDUET
BE IT REE02,ED BY IHE CITY FliNNCIL OF TFIIE CITY OF EDEN FFAIRTE MAT TPE
ATTALI-E1) LtrEKIJ fY3AFE ihE FINAL ADOPTED litAX3ET FOR 1987.
JUNE '21 ,13
CARY D. FETERSO\l, MAYOR
ATTEST:
j0I-Ui D. FRAIE, CITY CLERK
M3 I
1.1\REV
CITY OF EDEN F1I
P
1
E
1987 81EY<AL. RAND
R
E
V
E
N
_
E
S
BUDGET ACTUH_ ELiEE PROPET-(EY TAXES 42(xx/00 LOCA._ BovEJN,IENT 32.46(40 HOMESTEAD Ci+ED IT
6404.4)0 PENSION AID
1c;Y:x")00 CIVIL DETEI\E All)
12000 DISASTER AID
L I GEWES
77000 PEI:VI TS & FEES
1:3139:Y) FEU:EAT ION
66211)0 F DES & 1E/44_11E78
240(140 INTEEEST 19t/EE
1(x.x.X.xi SFECIAL A8SESEIt1141
scHat_ LI4I904 36000 LANDFILL FEES
Ciphirrintn fIC
REVEI•tk: POND Ft/ES Rs\rr
TATE AID sTFEETs
RO,ENLE 25(00 TRANEFERS FROM:
CCN61 Mk, [ION 11.1,M 400000 REVETIE FIND
0 L IEUIR E1148
UT II_ I "f Y ELMS
13111+.3442 FEN) EY:4_0
N
i
5E16200 T. I.F. FUNDS
2000))
TOTALS
51169000
426190
324238
647836
112745
5450
99.-.Xx9
98518
159(186
607014
206268
1177/67
199)
3t',966
7643
179781
8220
20)
:33722
5202:0
7,401
11:XXX:X)
iCKX:X)
******
:1:Kg:KO
9167363
61790
-362
3836
12745
-6550
21518
276236
-551:86
-:2:77772
13767
19'E30
-34
76473
-3:000
1797:781
82720
21X1
87=
402:74)
3401
40000
-t,96217.10
0
****** EE.CE-417-E FEM.:31ES EV= EXEIND
I
l
l
.
E
E
S
I
T
I
S
N
O
T
E.E1C17:..S=1ii`i TO LEE TIE
FIX4D EAERCE TO FUND TEE 1987 EUDC
E
T
FIEND BPLAH".17 1217
1
/
8
6
16661 7;2 1987 ISECENJES
1981 E EES
I NE_T-17A:k: 1 N BALANIX.
'1158 EIAI_J-INCE 12/2.
1
/
8
7
16r, _7439
CITY OF DAN FFAIRIE
1987 CEDERAL FLND EX FENCES
LUDGET EALANCE
C I TY 2JU4=, I L
CITY MANAGER
FCT IONE
A9...WE8 I NG
F INANE-1E
MINA FESTJURUES
HUIAN SERV ICES
Cia.F3A._ SERV I MS
DATA FFTEESSINI
LEGAL/CIVIL
CITY HALL
FUEL IC INFOFMT ION
FLAW I NG
BUILD I NG IN -SPEC -HUN
PCL ICE
F IRE
CIVIL Cf.:T-ENSE
AN I MAL ay-ma_
P S . BUILD I 14-.
[NG I NEER I NG
ECU I Pl'ENT MITC
SNOW & ICE CO \ 11 ROL
SMETTS I.DRA11 ,14311
STREET L Taff I NG
. W . EdJILDIFES
C0111.1.1I TY ETEIN ICES
ADM I N I ETRAT I 17.1
PROGRAMS & n--)CT IVITI ES
PARKS
FORES MY
CIIIILN I TY CENTER
El•FLOYEE BEI‘E.F I is
REg.INE.
478))
128500
11200
2077.(x)
1139(x))
89800
577(x)
4961(x)
682,.)0
176)00
664(x)
15200
2994(X)
770600
177;7.9-x)
311.5oo
93(x)
72600
127.000
4/48600
4046(x)
7175(x)
7944.x.x.)
1323(x)
27700
112500
765'ax)
4866)0
829).)
5349(x)
979)))
7565X)
46616
128421
11076
207197.
1E8610
89614
57497
4959973
67976
135817
66298
14768
299178
370409
177:3277
311766
5652
32419
1212879
44E4055
404277
37244
793219
132191
27463
11X-44 )7
364676
486443
82618
574671
977679
350795
784
79
164
107
390
186
107
224
167
102
432
191
527
134
140
181
121
545
7:73
251
782
109
27/
293
524
157
321
5705
TOT 91.50400 9176556 13844
START OF
RETAKE
The images appearing between this point and the End of Retake target
are true, accurate, and complete copies of records that previously were
not filmed or were filmed incorrectly.
1 I NE XP CITY CF MEN PRAIRIE
1987 GENERAL FUND EXPENSES
BUDGET ACTU4_ BALANCE
CITY =MIL
CITY WTLAGER
ELECTICNS
(*MESSING
FINANCE
HilAIMESNRCES
ELM! SERVICES
GETERPL SERVICES
DATA PRDCESSIN3
LEGAL/CIVIL
CITY NAIL
PUBLIC INFURIATION
FUMING
BUILDING INSFECT1ON
FELICE
FIRE
CIVIL DEFENSE
ANIMAL CENTRCE
EUILDINRS
ENGINEERING
EGOIN43gE MITE
SNOW & ICT CENTRO-
STRUTS & DRAINLIAE
STREET LIGHTIN3
P.W. WILDINM
CallJNITY CU ICES
ADMINISTRATIEN
PROG;AlS & ACTIVITIES
PAVS
FOFESERY
CEMUNITY CENTER
ETFLOYEEBENETITS
FnESERVE
47420i
1285))
11200
20730)
189000
8980)
57700
496100
68200
13600)
66.44:1)
15204)
29940)
3706))
1T:59))
31150)
SD))
326))
125)))
4486(x)
4(460)
375))
7940))
1725))
277(x)
1125))
365D)0
486600
anY)
5749(x)
978000
35650)
46616
128421
11056
207193
188610
89614
57497
495993
67976
135817
66290
14768
299178
370409
1775277
711566
5652
32419
122879
448055
40427'7
77214
793218
132191
27463
11'Z-337
364676
486443
82618
574671
977679
35)795
7S4
79
164
107
790
186
703
'107
224
183
102
432
191
57 3
134
143
181
121
545
323
256
782
109
237
293
524
157
282
229
321
5705
TOTALS 91504(0 9176556 17.844
lab2
END OF
RETAKE
TOOPYUR 41u CCUNCIL
F1OM:j0I-N FRANE
DATE:JUNE 16.1988
RE:FIWAL. 1987 LUEGET AND REVE-NLE k\ED EXPENDITUE AMLNITS
FINPL AUDITED 1987 FEWNLES WFT,E $9,167.1,:61 WITH EXFENDITURES OF
$9436,556 0 Ft1/3 CI , $26,807. 'WE GETERPL FUND BALANCE STANDS AT
$1,692.9.
ADDED TO THE ETENUITLRE EUXIJAFE $100,000 FOR EXFENSES INCUiRED DURING
ilt JULY FLOOD AND $.f.00)) FCR INSURANCE aroTS FOR 1986 IliAT 4.EFE NOT
BDIM TO US 1111 IL 1987.
igt)(-1
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-121
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, the City Engineer through RCM, Inc. has prepared plans and
specifications for the following improvements to wit:
I.C. 52-051 (Mitchell Road and Research Road)
and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for
public inspection in the City Engineer's office, are hereby
approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the
official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement
for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved
plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for
3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids
shall be received until 10:00 A.M., July 15th, at City Hall after
which time they will be publically opened by the Deputy City Clerk
and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the
Council at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday, July 19, 1988 at the Eden Prairie
City Hall, 7600 Executive Road, Eden Prairie. No bids will be
considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied
by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check
payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on JUNE 21, 1988.
Gary D.Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
/4:29`;
-MEMORANDUM-
TO:
Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: Rodney W. Rue, Design Engineer a /7/6 /
DATE: June 15, 1988
SUBJECT: SCHOOL ZONES PEDESTRIAN SAFETY STUDY
At the Eden Prairie School Board meeting on O
c
t
o
b
e
r
6
,
1
9
8
7
,
t
h
e
B
o
a
r
d
formally requested consideration of a 20 mph scho
o
l
s
p
e
e
d
l
i
m
i
t
o
n
A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
Lakes Parkway near Eden Lake Elementary Sch
o
o
l
.
I
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
t
h
e
i
r
resolution requested that all other school area
s
b
e
s
t
u
d
i
e
d
f
o
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
s
p
e
e
d
zoning.
The scope of this report is to address the Schoo
l
B
o
a
r
d
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
a
n
d
r
e
v
i
e
w
the school zone signing and other traffic iss
u
e
s
.
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
made for changes in speed limits, signing or
o
t
h
e
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
h
a
t
w
i
l
l
enhance the safety of both the pedestrian and ve
h
i
c
u
l
a
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
.
In 1975, the Legislature changed Minnesota Sta
t
u
t
e
s
(
b
y
a
d
d
i
n
g
S
u
b
d
.
5
a
t
o
Section 169.14) to enable local authorities t
o
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
s
p
e
e
d
l
i
m
i
t
s
i
n
school zones. Previously, only the Commissioner of Highway
s
h
a
d
t
h
a
t
authority. As prescribed by the legislation and the Com
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
e
r
,
a
n
engineering and traffic study must be don
e
a
n
d
a
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
p
e
e
d
l
i
m
i
t
established based on its findings. In addition,
t
h
e
l
a
w
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
t
h
a
t
"
t
h
e
school speed limit shall not be lower than 20 mi
l
e
s
p
e
r
h
o
u
r
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
n
o
t
b
e
more than 15 miles per hour below the establish
e
d
s
p
e
e
d
l
i
m
i
t
o
n
a
n
a
f
f
e
c
t
e
d
street or highway if the established speed li
m
i
t
i
s
4
0
m
i
l
e
s
p
e
r
h
o
u
r
o
r
greater".
The schoul district provided a map showing the
a
r
e
a
n
e
a
r
e
a
c
h
s
c
h
o
o
l
w
h
e
r
e
bus service is not provided and an approximate
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
c
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
i
n
t
h
a
t
area which walk to school. This information wa
s
u
s
e
d
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
patterns and crossing locations near each sch
o
o
l
.
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
c
o
u
n
t
e
r
s
w
e
r
e
utilized to obtain traffic volume and speed data
o
n
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
e
a
c
h
school. In addition, actual pedestrian counts were obt
a
i
n
e
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
E
d
e
n
Lake School area. This information along with the general phys
i
c
a
l
characteristics of each area were evaluated.
A brief summation of this information and our recommendations for each scho
o
l
a
r
e
a
f
o
l
l
o
w
s
:
blgta
EDEN LAKE ELEMENTARY
The current traffic volume on Anderson
L
a
k
e
s
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
is approximately 7,500 vehicles pe
r
d
a
y
w
i
t
h
a
n
8
5
-
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
i
l
e
s
p
e
e
d
approximately 43 mph. The 15-minute tra
f
f
i
c
v
o
l
u
m
e
s
a
t
t
h
e
t
i
m
e
c
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
a
r
e
going to and from school currently
r
a
n
g
e
f
r
o
m
2
5
t
o
6
5
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
i
n
o
n
e
direction. Based on the age of the
c
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
a
t
t
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
i
s
s
c
h
o
o
l
a
n
d
t
h
e
location of the school's playgrou
n
d
a
r
e
a
,
a
s
p
e
e
d
l
i
m
i
t
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
s
appropriate. A 25 mph school speed l
i
m
i
t
o
n
A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
L
a
k
e
s
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
Preserve Boulevard and westerly of
H
o
m
e
w
a
r
d
H
i
l
l
s
R
o
a
d
w
h
e
n
c
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
a
r
e
present is recommended.
Stop sign warrants were evaluated a
t
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
L
a
k
e
s
Parkway and Preserve Boulevard.
The pedestrian volume during school hou
r
s
was quite low, however, the vehicular
v
o
l
u
m
e
w
a
s
l
a
r
g
e
e
n
o
u
g
h
t
o
w
a
r
r
a
n
t
a
four-way stop at this intersection.
Stop sign warrants were also checked at
the intersection of Anderson Lakes P
a
r
k
w
a
y
a
n
d
H
o
m
e
w
a
r
d
H
i
l
l
s
R
o
a
d
.
The pedestrian volume using the underpass
n
e
a
r
H
o
m
e
w
a
r
d
H
i
l
l
s
R
o
a
d
w
a
s
a
b
o
u
t
5
0
with an additional 22 pedestrians th
a
t
c
r
o
s
s
e
d
A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
L
a
k
e
s
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
a
t
Homeward Hills Road. There is a suffic
i
e
n
t
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
b
i
k
e
p
a
t
h
s
t
o
s
e
r
v
e
t
h
e
pedestrian volumes adjacent to and app
r
o
a
c
h
i
n
g
A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
L
a
k
e
s
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
.
W
i
t
h
this pedestrian volume and the corresp
o
n
d
i
n
g
v
e
h
i
c
u
l
a
r
v
o
l
u
m
e
,
w
a
r
r
a
n
t
s
f
o
r
multi-way stop signs were not met at
t
h
i
s
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
I
t
i
s
t
h
e
r
e
f
o
r
e
recommended that a four-way stop condi
t
i
o
n
b
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
w
i
t
h
p
a
i
n
t
e
d
c
r
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
s
at the intersection of Anderson Lakes
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
a
n
d
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
a
l
s
o
a painted crosswalk on Homeward Hills
R
o
a
d
b
e
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
.
FOREST HILLS ELEMENTARY
The traffic volume on Holly Road adj
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
i
s
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
8
0
0
vehicles per day with an 85-percentil
e
s
p
e
e
d
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
4
8
m
p
h
.
T
h
e
e
a
s
t
bound speed on this minor collector i
s
e
x
c
e
s
s
i
v
e
,
a
n
d
m
a
y
b
e
a
t
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
t
o
the downhill grade (11%) which is ad
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
e
r
n
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
school property. Currently, there e
x
i
s
t
s
a
f
o
u
r
-
w
a
y
s
t
o
p
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
painted crosswalks at the intersection
o
f
H
o
l
l
y
R
o
a
d
w
i
t
h
R
o
s
e
m
a
r
y
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
the school entrance along with a bike p
a
t
h
o
n
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
H
o
l
l
y
R
o
a
d
.
Based on the above data and the age o
f
c
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
a
t
t
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
i
s
s
c
h
o
o
l
,
o
u
r
recommendation for the Forest Hills E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
S
c
h
o
o
l
i
s
t
o
h
a
v
e
a
2
5
m
p
h
school speed limit when children are
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
o
n
H
o
l
l
y
R
o
a
d
f
r
o
m
B
a
k
e
r
R
o
a
d
westerly to the approximate school
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
b
o
u
n
d
a
r
y
.
I
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
i
t
i
s
recommended that a school advance sig
n
b
e
p
l
a
c
e
d
o
n
s
o
u
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
B
a
k
e
r
R
o
a
d
t
o
warn drivers of a school area.
2
PRAIRIE VIEW ELEMENTARY
The current traffic volume on Duck Lake Road adjacent t
o
t
h
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
i
s
approximately 2,500 vehicles per day with an 85-percentile speed approximately 37 mph. The current vehicular volume when children are going
to or coming from school is averaging about one vehicle per
m
i
n
u
t
e
.
Due to the age of the children and the fact that they must
c
r
o
s
s
D
u
c
k
L
a
k
e
Road to attend school, it is recommended that a 20 mph sc
h
o
o
l
s
p
e
e
d
l
i
m
i
t
when children are present be established approximately betwe
e
n
P
e
t
e
r
b
o
r
g
R
o
a
d
and Mallard Court. This school speed limit should provide
a
s
a
f
e
r
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
at South Shore Lane and establish an awareness of the sch
o
o
l
p
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
a
r
e
a
located adjacent to Duck Lake Road.
There currently exists a painted crosswalk with pedestria
n
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
i
g
n
s
a
t
the intersection of Duck Lake Road and South Shore Lane an
d
a
b
i
k
e
p
a
t
h
a
l
o
n
g
Duck Lake Road adjacent to the school. Also, a painted cr
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
a
n
d
s
c
h
o
o
l
advance sign exists on Peterborg Road. It is recommended
t
h
a
t
s
c
h
o
o
l
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
signs be installed on Duck Lake Road and that the pedestr
i
a
n
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
i
g
n
s
at South Shore Lane be changed to school crossing signs.
CENTRAL MIDDLE SCHOOL
The traffic volume was checked on Scenic Heights Road
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
n
e
a
r
t
h
e
Central Middle School. The volume is approximately 6,000 vehicles per day
with an 85-percentile speed approximately 37 mph.
The vehicular volume is consistent with a collector facility with the speed being
s
l
i
g
h
t
l
y
h
i
g
h
f
o
r
the curvilinear alignment of Scenic Heights Road. The
s
c
h
o
o
l
i
s
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
approximately 800 feet north of Scenic Heights Road and d
o
e
s
n
o
t
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
n
y
major problems with the vehicular traffic on Scenic Heights
R
o
a
d
.
Currently, there exists a bike crossing near the inters
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
S
c
e
n
i
c
Heights Road and School Road and a bike path located on t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
Scenic Heights Road easterly of Village Woods Drive and on
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
Scenic Heights Road westerly of the bike crossing. Adequa
t
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
signing also exists along Scenic Heights Road. However, the
r
e
a
r
e
s
o
m
e
t
r
e
e
s
along the north side of the road that affect the sight
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
t
o
t
h
e
intersection.
Due to the location of the school in relationship to Scenic
H
e
i
g
h
t
s
R
o
a
d
,
t
h
e
age of the children and the fact that busing is provided
s
o
u
t
h
o
f
S
c
e
n
i
c
Heights Road, our recommendation is to maintain the e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
g
n
i
n
g
including the marked bicycle crossing. A school crossing
a
t
t
h
a
t
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
doesn't appear to be appropriate since the crossing serve
s
a
s
a
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n
of the bike path going east and west and there is not a di
r
e
c
t
l
i
n
k
t
o
t
h
e
school. However, in order to provide better sight distanc
e
t
o
t
h
i
s
b
i
c
y
l
e
crossing, it is suggested that the trees east of School Ro
a
d
b
e
t
r
i
m
m
e
d
.
3
/298
EDEN PRAIRIE HIGH SCHOOL
A brief review of the area near the high school indi
c
a
t
e
s
a
f
o
u
r
-
w
a
y
s
t
o
p
condition at the intersection of Valley View Road, Nam
e
s
W
a
y
a
n
d
t
h
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
entrance. Painted crosswalks are also existing on two legs
o
f
t
h
e
intersection. Bike paths and a pedestrian overpass are also located in
t
h
e
area with adequate sight distance and fencing provid
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
V
a
l
l
e
y
V
i
e
w
Road.
School advance signs are recommended on Valley View R
o
a
d
a
n
d
H
a
m
e
s
W
a
y
i
n
order to alert drivers of the school and activity area
a
n
d
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
s
o
m
e
consistency in the signing of all the schools within the
C
i
t
y
.
FUTURE SCHOOLS
As new school facilities are constructed, traffic patte
r
n
s
a
n
d
t
o
p
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
conditions should be reviewed and appropriate signing i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
a
s
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
are constructed or improved. The establishment of schoo
l
s
p
e
e
d
z
o
n
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
be based on studies of traffic volume and speed data.
RWR:ss
I d c)c)
A
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 88-122
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT
OF 25 MPH ON A PORTION OF
ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY
WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Public Works Department has p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
a
r
e
p
o
r
t
/
m
e
m
o
outlining the traffic and pedestrian conditions near Ed
e
n
L
a
k
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
a
s
p
e
r
Minnesota Statute 169.14, Subd. 5a; and
WHEREAS, the report/memo recommends a school speed
l
i
m
i
t
o
f
2
5
m
p
h
o
n
Anderson Lakes Parkway between Preserve Boulevard and
H
o
m
e
w
a
r
d
H
i
l
l
s
R
o
a
d
when children are present.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY
C
O
U
N
C
I
L
:
That the 25 mph school speed limit (when children
a
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
)
o
n
Anderson Lakes Parkway between Preserve Boulevard and
H
o
m
e
w
a
r
d
H
i
l
l
s
Road be authorized and that the Director of Public Work
s
b
e
d
i
r
e
c
t
e
d
t
o
install the appropriate signing.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 21, 1988
.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
13o0
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 88-123
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT
OF 25 MPH ON A PORTION OF
HOLLY ROAD
WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Public Works Department has p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
a
r
e
p
o
r
t
/
m
e
m
o
outlining the traffic and pedestrian conditions near F
o
r
e
s
t
H
i
l
l
s
S
c
h
o
o
l
a
s
per Minnesota Statute 169.14, Subd. 5a; and
WHEREAS, the report/memo recommends a school spee
d
l
i
m
i
t
o
f
2
5
m
p
h
o
n
Holly Road from Baker Road to about westerly property l
i
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
w
h
e
n
children are present.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY
C
O
U
N
C
I
L
:
That the 25 mph school speed limit (when children
a
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
)
o
n
Holly Road from Baker Road to about the westerly prop
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
school be authorized and that the Director of Public W
o
r
k
s
b
e
d
i
r
e
c
t
e
d
to install the appropriate signing.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 21, 19
8
8
.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
ad
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 88-124
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT
OF 20 MPH ON A PORTION OF
DUCK LAKE ROAD
WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Public Works Department has prepared a report/memo
outlining the traffic and pedestrian conditions near Prairie View School as
per Minnesota Statute 169.14, Subd. 5a; and
WHEREAS, the report/memo recommends a school speed limit of 20 mph on
Duck Lake Road between Peterborg Road and Mallard Court when children are
present.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
That the 20 mph school speed limit (when children are present) on Duck
Lake Road between Peterborg Road and Mallard Court be authorized and
that the Director of Public Works be directed to install the appropriate
Signing.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 21, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-125
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, the City Engineer through HTPO has prepared plans and specifications
for the following improvements to wit:
I.C. 52-132 (FRANLO ROAD)
and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for
public inspection in the City Engineer's office, are hereby
approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the
official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement
for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved
plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for
3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids
shall be received until 10:00 A.M., July 15th, at City Hall after
which time they will be publically opened by the Deputy City Clerk
and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the
Council at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday, July 19, 1988 at the Eden Prairie
City Hall, 7600 Executive Road, Eden Prairie. No bids will be
considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied
by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check
payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on JUNE 21, 1988.
Gary D.Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
THRU:
Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM:
Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natura
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
'
r
e
i
t
'
t/
DATE:
June 15, 1988
SUBJECT: Request from Private Vendor to Sell on 4th of July
The City presently has an ordinance that rest
r
i
c
t
s
a
l
l
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
v
e
n
d
o
r
s
f
r
o
m
selling within City park boundaries without a
p
e
r
m
i
t
.
I
n
t
h
e
p
a
s
t
,
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
has not allowed any vendors to sell anything wi
t
h
i
n
p
a
r
k
b
o
u
n
d
a
r
i
e
s
u
n
l
e
s
s
t
h
e
vendor was associated with an Eden Prairie civi
c
o
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
.
The City has received a request from a vendor
t
h
a
t
s
e
l
l
s
p
l
a
s
t
i
c
n
e
c
k
l
a
c
e
s
that glow in the dark to be allowed to sell f
o
r
o
n
e
h
o
u
r
a
t
R
o
u
n
d
L
a
k
e
P
a
r
k
on the 4th of July. He sells these necklaces fo
r
$
1
e
a
c
h
a
n
d
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
to sell in the Minneapolis park system on the 4
t
h
o
f
J
u
l
y
f
o
r
a
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
o
f
the profit and in St. Louis Park for a flat fee
o
f
$
1
5
0
o
n
t
h
e
4
t
h
o
f
J
u
l
y
.
He has requested the right to sell these item
s
f
o
r
o
n
e
h
o
u
r
a
n
d
i
s
w
i
l
l
i
n
g
negotiate a percentage of the profit or pay a fl
a
t
f
e
e
.
Some of the issues that should be considered are
:
1. Should the City allow vendors to use public pa
r
k
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
f
o
r
p
r
o
f
i
t
o
n
special events such as the 4th of July, as lon
g
a
s
t
h
e
y
a
r
e
n
o
t
c
o
m
p
e
t
i
n
g
with any of the community service organization
c
o
n
c
e
s
s
i
o
n
s
?
2. If the City encouraged these types of vendors,
w
o
u
l
d
t
h
e
r
e
l
i
k
e
l
y
b
e
m
o
r
e
community participation at the event throughou
t
t
h
e
d
a
y
?
3. If the City determines to allow that type of us
e
,
s
h
o
u
l
d
t
h
e
r
e
b
e
a
f
l
a
t
fee for any type of concessionaire that would
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
a
p
e
r
m
i
t
?
In the past, the City has recruited certain ty
p
e
s
o
f
"
v
e
n
d
o
r
s
"
s
u
c
h
a
s
t
h
e
helicopter rides on the 4th of July, but has d
i
s
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
f
o
o
d
v
e
n
d
o
r
s
t
h
a
t
may compete with public service organization
f
o
o
d
c
o
n
c
e
s
s
i
o
n
s
.
S
o
m
e
"
v
e
n
d
o
r
s
"
are participating in the 4th of July event
o
n
a
"
f
r
e
e
"
b
a
s
i
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
t
h
e
Roller Blade Company and the Sail Board Compa
n
y
,
w
h
o
o
f
f
e
r
f
r
e
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
r
product and "mini lessons" in hopes that peo
p
l
e
m
a
y
b
y
t
h
e
i
r
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
a
f
t
e
r
being able to try it at no cost.
Staff would recommend allowing vendors to use
R
o
u
n
d
L
a
k
e
P
a
r
k
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
a
f
l
a
t
fee permit of $150 per day. The permit would
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
w
h
e
r
e
t
h
e
y
could set up their booth, and would control w
h
a
t
i
t
e
m
s
c
o
u
l
d
b
e
f
o
r
s
a
l
e
.
N
o
items that would be considered in direct competition with publ
i
c
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
organizations would be approved for sale.
BL:md
I q
Technology Park Phase IV
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 19-88-PUD-3-88
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 3-88-
1-2 District (hereinafter "PUD 3-88-1-2).
Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of
that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of June 21, 1988, entered into between
Technology Park Associates and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's
Agreement") and that certain Supplement to Developer's Agreement, dated as of June
21, 1988, entered into between William and Margaret Pearson, husband and wife, and
the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Supplement"). The Developer's Agreement and
Supplement contain the terms and conditions of PUD 3-88-1-2, and are hereby made a
part hereof.
Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings:
A. PUD 3-88-1-2 is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide Plan of
the City.
B. PUD 3-88-1-2 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and
unified environment within its own boundaries.
C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of
the City Code, that are contained in PUD 3-88-1-2, are justified by
the design of the development described therein.
D. PUD 3-88-1-2 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement
that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a
complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit.
Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and
hereby is, removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
Planned Unit Development 3-88-1-2 District, and the legal descriptions of land in
each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B,
shall be and are amended accordingly.
Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
1366"
Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 17th day of May, 1988, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 21st day of
June, 1988.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
1.306
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description
Outlot B, TECHNOLOGY PARK 3RD ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
/3(1)
Technology Park Phase IV
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of
, 1988, by
Technology Park Associates, a Minnesota partnership, hereinafter referred to as
"Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept
on 41 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review, with waivers, and Zoning
District Change from rural to PUD-3-88-I-2 on 13 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 41
acres into one lot and two outlots for construction of 162,860 sq. ft. of industrial
use, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter
referred to as the property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #19-88-PUD-
3-88, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and
maintenance of said property as follows:
1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the
materials revised and dated May 17, 1988, reviewed and approved by
the City Council on May 17, 1988, and attached hereto as Exhibit B,
subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein.
Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the
property in any other respect or manner than provided herein.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by
Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of
all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Concurrent with, and as part of the final plat for the property,
Developer agrees to dedicate the following to the City:
A. Outlot B, consisting of 1.44 acres along Nine Mile Creek as
W)?
depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
B. A 20-foot wide trail easement over the trails located along
the east side of the property, connecting to Outlot B at the
south end of the property and connecting to the intersection
of Golden Triangle Drive and West 76th Street at the north
end of the property (south of Outlot A), all as depicted in
Exhibit B, attached hereto.
4. Developer shall notify the City and the Watershed District 48 hours
prior to any grading, tree removal, or tree cutting on the property.
5. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City
Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water,
storm sewer, and erosion control for the property. Said plans shall
include plans for extension of watermain to Smetana Lane in the
southwest area of the property.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or
cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said
plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit
C, attached hereto.
6. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property,
Developer agrees to submit to the Director of Planning, and to
obtain the Director's approval of:
A. Samples of exterior building materials for the structures on
the property.
B. An overall lighting plan for the property, including parking
lot lighting, lighting for and on any structures, which
depicts the height, color, and location of all lighting on
the property. Said lighting shall be designed with down-
cast, cut-off luminars to prevent glare off the property.
C. An overall signage plan for the property, including size and
location of all signs, types of materials to be used, and
color(s) of materials.
D. Detailed plans for screening of rooftop mechannical
equipment, including materials to be used, colors of
materials, and location of said mechanical equipment.
Materials used shall be architecturally integral with the
materials submitted for item A. above.
E. Detailed plans for the berm to be located in the southwest
area of the property for screening of the residential area
to the southwest from the southerly (Tech 7) building, as
depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer agrees to
implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements listed
Ho9
above, as approved by the Director of Planning, in accordance with
the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
7. Concurrent with building construction, Developer agrees to construct
an eight-foot wide bituminous trail along Golden Triangle Drive and
along Nine Mile Creek, all as depicted in Exhibit B, attached
hereto. Developer further agrees to construct said trails in
accordance with City specifications and in accordance with the terms
and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
8. Developer and City acknowledge that it may become necessary, in the
future, to extend a road through the property from Golden Triangle
Drive, westerly, to the adjacent property(ies) in order to prnvide
for adequate traffic circulation and to provide for good access to
the property(ies) for emergency vehicles. Developer agrees that,
should City, in its sole discretion, determine that such a road
connection is necessary in the future, Developer shall not object to
said road connection through the property.
M10
Technology Park Phase IV
OWNERS SUPPLEMENT TO
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN
TECHNOLOGY PARK ASSOCIATES
AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of
, 1988, by
and between William G. and Margaret M. Pearson, husband and wife, hereinafter
referred to as "Owners," and the City of Eden Prairie, hereinafter referred to as
"City:"
For and in consideration of, and to induce, City to adopt Ordinance #19-88-
PUD-3-88 changing the zoning of the property owned by Owners from the Rural District
to the PUD-3-88-I-2 District, as more fully described in that certain Developer's
Agreement entered into as of
, 1988, by and between Technology
Park Associates and City, Owners agree with the City as follows:
1. If Technology Park Associates fail to proceed in accordance with the
Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owners
shall not oppose the rezoning of the property to Rural.
2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owners,
their successors, heirs, and assigns of the property.
3. If the Owners transfer such property, Owners shall obtain an
agreement from the transferree requiring that such transferee agree
to the terms of the Developer's Agreement.
CITY
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Technology Park Phase IV
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-101
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE 19-88-PUD-3-88 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 19-88-PUD-3-88 was adopted and ordered published at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 21st day of
June, 1988;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 19-88-PUD-3-88, which
is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that
said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of
said ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 19-88-PUD-3-88 shall be recorded in the ordinance
book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph 8
herein, within 20 days after said publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on June 21, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
130,
Technology Park Phase IV
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 19-88-PUD-3-88
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRI PTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
5.121111211: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land 1 ocated West of
Golden Triangle Drive, north of Nine Mile Creek, east of Smetana Lane from the Rural
District to the PUD-3-88-I-2 District, subject to the terms and c onditions of a
developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gi ves the full
legal description of this property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
/s/John D. Frane
/s/Gary D. Peterson City Clerk
Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
, 1988.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
/313
Blossom Ridge 2nd Addition
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 20-88
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the R1-22 District and be placed in the R1-13.5 District.
Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be,
and hereby is removed from the R1-22 District and shall be included hereafter in the
R1-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in
City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph 8, shall be, and are amended
accordingly.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of
that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of , entered into
between Kenneth W. and Karen A. Koch, husband and wife, Paul R. and Susan C. Lawson,
husband and wife, and G. William and Patricia H. Pearson, husband and wife, and the
City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement is hereby made a part hereof.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 17th day of May, 1988, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 21st day of
June, 1988.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description
Lots 17 and 18, EDEN PRAIRIE ACRES, Hennepin C
o
u
n
t
y
,
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
Blossom Ridge 2nd Addition
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of
, 1988, by
G. William and Patricia H. Pearson, husband and wife, Kenneth W. and Karen A. Koch
husband and wife, and Paul R. and Susan C. Lawson, husband and wife, hereinafter
referred to as "Owners,' and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Owners have applied to City for Zoning District Change from R1-22
to R1-13.5 on 6.32 acres and Preliminary Plat of 6.32 acres into 14 single family
lots and road right-of-way, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more
fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said
acreage hereinafter referred to as "the property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #20-88,
Owners covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance o
f
said property as follows:
1. Owners shall develop the property in conformance with the materials
revised and dated May 11, 1988, reviewed and approved by the City
Council on May 17, 1988, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject
to such changes and modifications as provided herein. Owners shall
not develop, construct upon, or maintain the property in any other
respect or manner than provided herein.
2. Owners covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by
Owners at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all
of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property, Owners
shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's
approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer,
and erosion control for the property.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Owners shall construct, or cause
ego
to be constructed, those improvements listed
a
b
o
v
e
i
n
s
a
i
d
p
l
a
n
s
,
a
s
approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto.
4. Owners acknowledge that there is a poten
t
i
a
l
t
h
a
t
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
f
r
o
m
storm sewer facilities on the property co
u
l
d
c
a
u
s
e
e
r
o
s
i
o
n
o
n
l
a
n
d
directly to the east of the property as
i
t
f
l
o
w
s
o
v
e
r
l
a
n
d
t
o
t
h
e
depressed area in that location. In the f
u
t
u
r
e
,
w
h
e
n
t
h
e
l
a
n
d
t
o
the east is developed, the discharge fr
o
m
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
w
i
l
l
b
e
carried in a storm sewer extended east
e
r
l
y
a
l
l
t
h
e
w
a
y
t
o
t
h
e
depressed area on the land to the east. O
w
n
e
r
s
a
g
r
e
e
t
h
a
t
,
f
o
r
t
h
e
temporary condition, a small settling b
a
s
i
n
a
n
d
r
i
p
r
a
p
w
i
l
l
b
e
installed by Owners at the outlet to dis
s
i
p
a
t
e
e
n
e
r
g
y
a
n
d
a
w
e
i
r
overflow will be installed by Owners to
d
i
s
p
e
r
s
e
t
h
e
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
.
Owners also agree to monitor the overland
r
o
u
t
e
a
c
r
o
s
s
t
h
e
l
a
n
d
t
o
the east during the warranty period, as
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
i
n
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
C
,
attached hereto, of the project to correc
t
a
n
y
e
r
o
s
i
o
n
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
that may develop.
5. Owners agree to notify the City and the Wat
e
r
s
h
e
d
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
a
t
l
e
a
s
t
48 hours in advance of any grading, or
t
r
e
e
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
,
o
n
t
h
e
property.
6. Owners have submitted to the City and obta
i
n
e
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
of, a tree replacement plan for 349.5 calip
e
r
i
n
c
h
e
s
o
f
t
r
e
e
s
w
h
i
c
h
are planned to be removed from the propert
y
d
u
e
t
o
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
n
said property as approved by City.
Owners agree to implement, or cause to be
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
,
s
a
i
d
t
r
e
e
replacement plan, in accordance with the Tre
e
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
P
o
l
i
c
y
o
f
the City, attached hereto as Exhibit D, and
m
a
d
e
a
p
a
r
t
h
e
r
e
o
f
.
7. Owners agrees to implement erosion control
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
a
n
d
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
protective measures for areas to be pre
s
e
r
v
e
d
a
n
d
a
r
e
a
s
w
h
e
r
e
grading is not to occur, and to receive
C
i
t
y
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
s
a
i
d
measures. Owners agree that said protective
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
,
but not be limited to:
A. Grading shall be confined to that area
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
within the construction limits.
B. Snow fencing shall be placed at the con
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
l
i
m
i
t
s
within the wooded areas of the property prior
t
o
a
n
y
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
upon the property.
C. City shall perform an on-site inspection o
f
s
a
i
d
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
v
e
measures on the property by the City.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
s
h
a
l
l
contact City for said inspection. Devel
o
p
e
r
a
g
r
e
e
s
t
h
a
t
defects in materials and workmanship in t
h
e
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
of said measures shall then be determined b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
D. Defects in materials or workmanship, i
f
a
n
y
,
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
corrected by Owners. Owners agree to
c
a
l
l
C
i
t
y
f
o
r
reinspection of the implementation measures
,
a
n
d
t
o
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
mr)
approval by the City prior to issuance of the grading permit
by the City. Approval of materials and workmanship may be
subject to such conditions as the City may impose at the
time of acceptance.
8. Owners have also submitted to the City, and obtained the City's
approval of a tree inventory of those trees within 25 ft. outside of
the construction area, which are not planned to be removed by
construction on the property as approved by City, indicating the
size, type, and location of all trees twelve (12) inches in
diameter, or greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground level.
If any such trees are removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the
construction area, Owners agree that prior to issuance of any
building permit for the property, Developer shall:
A. Submit to the Director of Planning, and obtain the
Director's approval of a reforestation plan for all trees
removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction
area. Said plan shall indicate that the trees shall be
replaced by similar tree species and that the trees used for
reforestation shall be no less than six inches in diameter.
The amount of trees to be replaced shall be determined by
the Director of Planning, using a square inch per square
inch basis, according to the area of the circle created by a
cross sectional cut through the diameter of a tree as
measured 4.5 feet above the ground.
B. Prepare and submit to the Director of Planning, and receive
the Director's approval of a written estimate of the costs
of the reforestation work to be completed.
C. Submit a bond, or letter of credit, guaranteeing completion
of all reforestation work as approved by the Director of
Planning. Ownes agree that the amount of the bond, or
letter of credit, shall be 150% of the approved estimated
cost of implementation of all reforestation work and shall
be in such form and contain such other provisions and terms
as may be required by the Director of Planning.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Owners shall implement,
or cause to be implemented, those improvements listed above in said
plans, as approved by the Director of Planning.
/317
Blossom Ridge 2nd Addition
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-106
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE 20-88 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 20-88 was adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 20th day of June,
1988;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 20-88, which is
attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said
text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said
ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 20-88 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein,
within 20 days after said publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on June 21, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
I
Blossom Ridge 2nd Addition
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 20-88
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FR
O
M
O
N
E
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS O
F
L
A
N
D
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 1
1
.
9
9
,
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
LIMEY: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located south of
Blossom Road, east of Windsor Terrace, from the R1-22 District to the R1-
1
3
.
5
District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Ex
h
i
b
i
t
A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this prope
r
t
y
.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
(
/s/John D. Frane
/s/Gary D. Peterson City Clerk
Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
, 1988.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
I3a0
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
THRU:
Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation &
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
FROM:
Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect
DATE:
June 15, 1988
SUBJECT: Play Equipment at Eden Lake Scho
o
l
/
P
a
r
k
,
W
i
l
l
o
w
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
W
y
n
d
h
a
m
Knoll Park
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource
s
s
t
a
f
f
i
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
g
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
to solicit bids for three parks.
The proposed play equipment at Eden Lake
S
c
h
o
o
l
/
P
a
r
k
w
i
l
l
a
u
g
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
p
l
a
y
equipment installed last year during co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
.
T
h
e
p
l
a
y
equipment has been selected with the help
o
f
t
h
e
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
t
e
a
c
h
e
r
and approved by the school's principal, B
o
b
H
a
l
l
e
t
t
.
T
h
e
c
o
s
t
o
f
t
h
i
s
p
l
a
y
equipment is not to exceed $15,000. The City will be reimbursed by th
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
in $5,000 payments over a three year perio
d
w
i
t
h
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
b
y
s
c
h
o
o
l
carnivals.
Staff attended a neighborhood meeting for re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
W
y
n
d
h
a
m
K
n
o
l
l
Park. The purpose of the meeting was to di
s
c
u
s
s
a
n
d
s
e
l
e
c
t
t
h
e
t
y
p
e
o
f
p
l
a
y
equipment to be installed in the neighbor
h
o
o
d
p
a
r
k
.
T
h
e
c
o
s
t
o
f
t
h
i
s
p
l
a
y
equipment will not exceed $8,000, and will b
e
t
a
k
e
n
o
u
t
o
f
c
a
s
h
p
a
r
k
f
e
e
s
.
The residents surrounding Willow Park wer
e
i
n
v
i
t
e
d
t
o
a
t
t
e
n
d
e
d
t
h
e
P
a
r
k
s
,
Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
J
u
n
e
2
0
t
h
t
o
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
t
h
e
play equipment to be installed in the par
k
.
T
h
e
c
o
s
t
o
f
t
h
i
s
p
l
a
y
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
will not exceed $8,000, and will be paid fo
r
o
u
t
o
f
c
a
s
h
p
a
r
k
f
e
e
s
.
BPC:mdd
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
TRROWH:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Kate Karnas, Planning Assistant
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
June 17, 1988
Release from Conditions of Developer's Agreement
Chestnut Apartments
The Chestnut Apartments development, located at the northeast quadrant of
Anderson Lakes Parkway and Chestnut Drive, is currently in the process of
being sold. Just north and east of Chestnut Apartments is a vacant, 15-acre
parcel of land known as Mitchell Heights, which was reviewed by the City in
1979 for development of 94 townhouse units. Construction of the townhouse
units, which were proposed by Richard Miller, Inc., has not been initiated
since the 1979 approval, however.
The mortgage company handling the sale of Chestnut Apartments has found that
the agreement for Mitchell Heights Addition has been filed against not only
the Mitchell Heights property, but also over a portion of the property of
Chestnut Apartments--in other words, the legal descriptions for the two
properties overlap.
Of course, the mortgage company would like to have clear title to the land,
without obligation. Staff has reviewed this situation with the City
Attorney's office. Their recommendation was to prepare a resolution releasing
the Chestnut Apartments from any and all obligations under the Developer's
Agreement for Mitchell Heights, but also leaving the conditions of the
agreement in place for the remainder of the Mitchell Heights Addition in case
It ever is developed in its current approved status. A resolution to
accomplish this is attached.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-113
RECORDING CONFORMANCE WITH MITCHELL HEIGHTS
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR CHESTNUT APARTMENTS
WHEREAS, on October 2, 1979, Ryco Development, Inc., a Minnesota corporation
(Owner) and City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation, entered into a certain
Developer'a Agreement (Agreement) pertaining to that certain property referred to as
MITCHELL HEIGHTS and legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and,
WHEREAS, the legal description contained in said Agreement included a
portion of property now part of the development known as Chestnut Apartments,
legally described in Exhibit B, attached hereto; and,
WHEREAS, the owners of the Chestnut Apartments have complied with, and/or
are not subject to any and all provisions of said Agreement as to the development of
the MITCHELL HEIGHTS; and,
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed the Agreement for compliance by
Chestnut Apartments with said Agreement for MITCHELL HEIGHTS and has so advised this
Council;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Eden Prairie City Council that as to
Chestnut Apartments, as legally described in Exhibit B, attached hereto, the City
finds that:
All items of the Agreement have been satisfactorily completed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect as to all items and lots not mentioned herein.
ADOPTED by the City Council on June 21, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
John D. Frane, Clerk
SEAL
EIMINNIN
..<„4.it
That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter ((1
W
1
/
4
of SW 1/4) of Section 15, Township IR, Range 22. Hennepin C
o
u
n
t
y
,
Minnesota described on follows; Commencing at the Southwest c
o
r
n
e
r
of sold NW 1/4 of SW 1/4; thence North 89 degrees 46 minutes 3
3
seconds Last, assumed bearing, along the South line of said Nor
t
h
w
e
s
t
1/4 el the Southwest 1/4. distance of 734.00 feet: thence North
0
0
degrees 13 minutes 27 seconds West. distance of 44.00 feet: th
e
n
c
e
Korth 44 degrees 17 minutes 13 seconds Last a distance of 234,93
feet; thence North 00 degrees 42 minutes 47 seconds West enita
n
c
e
Of 84.45 feet; thence North 45 degrees 42 minutes 47 seconds We
s
t
• distance 01 311 feet, to the point of beginning: thence North 45 de-
gre.ss 00 minutes 00 seconds tact, distance of 130.00 feet: thence
North 45 degrees 42 minutes 47 seconds West a distance of 252.04
leer. thence Korth 0 degrees 12 minutes 47 seconds West a distan
c
e
of 205.35 feet, plus or minus. lathe North line of said NW 1/4 o
f
SW 1/4: thence South 89 degrees 48minutes 1) seconds West, al
o
n
g
said North line, a distance of 585.00 feet to the West line of said
NW 1/4 of SW 1/4; thence South 0 degrees 42 minutes 47 seconds
Mist, alon6 said West line, a distance of 579.62 feet. plus or minus,
to tee Northwesterly corner of Atherton lot AddiUon. a plat on file
i
n
the cffIces of Hennepin County; thence Korth 89 degrees 17 minut
e
s
13 Seconds Last a distance of 33.00 feet: thence North 44 Oegrees 17 minutes 13 seconds Last a distance of 265.00 feet: thence North
A? degrees 17 minutes 13 seconds East. distance of 55.00 feet:
thence South 45 degrees 42 minutes 47 seconds Last a distance of
573.00 feet to the actual pont. of beginning and there terminating.
R That part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 and the No
r
t
h
1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 15. Town
s
h
i
p
1
1
6
,
Stange 22. Hennepin County, Minnesota, descs1bed as follow
s
:
C
o
m
-
mencing ot the Southwest corner of laid Northwest 1/4 of the South
w
e
s
t
1/4; thence North 29 degrees 46 minutes 33 seconds Last. assume
d
bearing, alone the South line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 a distance of 734 feet: thence North 00 degrees 13 minutes 27
seconds west a distance of 44 ten: thence North 44 degrees 17 minutes
13 seconds Last distance of 234.93 feet; them, North 00 deg
r
e
e
s
4
7
minutes 47 seconds West a distance 0184.45 feet: thence North 45 de-
grees 42 minute's 47 seconds West a dtstaince of 311 feet: thence North
13 degrees 20 minutes OD seconds West a diStance of 233.79 l
e
e
r
;
t
h
e
n
c
e
North 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds Last a distance of 56.79 feet, to the point of beginning: thence South 45 degrees 00 minutes
0
0
s
e
c
o
n
d
s
Last a distance of 291.00 feet: thence a distance of 102.00 fee
t
a
l
o
n
g
a
tangential curve concave to the southwest and having a radius
o
f
3
1
6
.
5
0
feet: thence North 45 decrees OD minutes 00 seconds Last, not t
a
n
g
e
n
t
t
o
last described curve a distance of 260.00 feet; thence North • dista
n
c
e
of 142.50 feet; thence Cast a distance of 292.01 feet: thence o
n
a CUM.!. concave to the Southwest, (honing . central angle of 51 d•grees 34 minutes
72 seconds, a radius 01 910.73 feet.. chord distance 02 792.36 feet, a
Chord bearing of North 53 degrees 21 minutes 20 Seconds Went
)
.
o
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
Of 819.76 feet; thence on curve, concave to the Nortt.east. (h
o
n
i
n
g
a
central angle of 3 degrees 29 minutes 27 seconds, a radius 02 990.21 .
feet, a cher distance of 57.91 feet. s chord bearing of North 7
7
d
e
g
r
e
e
s
23 minutes 48 seconds West). a distance Of 57.92 feet. plus or tnintiS,
to the North line of said Southwest 1/401 Section 15: thence So
u
t
h
09 degrees 48 minutes 23 seconds We., along said north line. a distance
of 140.35 feet; thence South 0 dearer, 47 minutes 47 seconds L
a
s
t
a dis- tance of 275.35 fret; thence South IS degrees 42 minute.; 47 sec
o
n
d
s
Last, a distance of 257.04 feet; thence South 45 degrees OD
minute,. 00 eeConele West At...lance of 130.09 feet to the act6a I point of legtnning
end 1,, 1^,`11 'line.
rvI n •••••
Tract A
Tract
AA
COMMONWE _LTH
LAND TME INSURANCE COMPANY
A Mince Grow Hakim Cooparr
y
g44:44,3
File No. C24540
Schedule A-4-A
That part of the Northwes
t
1
/
4
o
f
t
h
e
S
o
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
1
/
4
a
n
d
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
1
/
2
o
f
the Northeast 1/4 of the
S
o
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
1
/
4
o
f
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
1
5
;
T
o
w
n
s
h
i
p
1
1
6
,
N
o
r
t
h
Range 22, West of the 5th
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
M
e
r
i
d
i
a
n
,
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
a
s
f
o
l
l
o
w
s
:
Commencing at the Southwe
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
1
/
4
o
f
t
h
e
Southwest 1/4 of said Sec
t
i
o
n
1
5
,
t
h
e
n
c
e
N
o
r
t
h
8
9
d
e
g
r
e
e
s
4
6
m
i
n
u
t
e
s
33 seconds East, assumed
b
e
a
r
i
n
g
,
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
S
o
u
t
h
l
i
n
e
o
f
s
a
i
d
Northwest 1/4 of the Sout
h
w
e
s
t
1
/
4
a
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
7
3
4
.
0
0
f
e
e
t
t
o
the actual point of beginning; thenc
e
N
o
r
t
h
0
0
d
e
g
r
e
e
s
1
3
m
i
n
u
t
e
s
2
7
seconds West a distance o
f
4
4
.
0
0
f
e
e
t
;
t
h
e
n
c
e
N
o
r
t
h
4
4
d
e
g
r
e
e
s
1
7
minutes 13 seconds East
a
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
2
3
4
.
9
3
f
e
e
t
;
t
h
e
n
c
e
N
o
r
t
h
0
0
degrees 42 minutes 47 se
c
o
n
d
s
W
e
s
t
a
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
8
4
.
4
5
f
e
e
t
;
/
t
h
e
n
c
e
North 45 degrees 42 minut
e
s
4
7
s
e
c
o
n
d
s
W
e
s
t
a
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
3
1
1
.
0
0
f
e
e
t
;
thence North 13 degrees 2
0
m
i
n
u
t
e
s
0
0
s
e
c
o
n
d
s
W
e
s
t
a
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
233.79 feet; thence North
4
5
d
e
g
r
e
e
s
E
a
s
t
a
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
5
6
.
7
9
f
e
e
t
;
thence South 45 degrees E
a
s
t
a
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
2
9
1
f
e
e
t
;
t
h
e
n
c
e
a
l
o
n
g
a
tangential curve concave
t
o
t
h
e
S
o
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
a
n
d
h
a
v
i
n
g
a
r
a
d
i
u
s
o
f
,
316.50 feet a distance of
1
0
2
f
e
e
t
;
t
h
e
n
c
e
N
o
r
t
h
4
5
d
e
g
r
e
e
s
E
a
s
t
,
n
o
t
tangent to last described
c
u
r
v
e
a
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
2
6
0
f
e
e
t
;
t
h
e
n
c
e
N
o
r
t
h
a
-
distance of 142.50 feet;
t
h
e
n
c
e
E
a
s
t
a
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
2
7
0
.
7
6
f
e
e
t
t
o
a
point on a curve having a
r
a
d
i
u
s
o
f
6
6
6
.
2
0
f
e
e
t
,
t
h
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
o
f
c
i
r
c
l
e
of said curve bears Sout
h
69 degrees 14 minutes 33 sec
o
n
d
s
W
e
s
t
f
r
o
m
said point; thence Southe
r
l
y
a
l
o
n
g
s
a
i
d
c
u
r
v
e
a
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
1
6
9
.
5
3
feet, more or less, to th
e
S
o
u
t
h
l
i
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
1
/
2
o
f
t
h
e
Northeast 1/4 of the Sou
t
h
w
e
s
t
1
/
4
o
f
s
a
i
d
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
1
5
;
t
h
e
n
c
e
W
e
s
t
e
r
l
y
along the South line of
s
a
i
d
N
o
r
t
h
1
/
2
t
o
t
h
e
S
o
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
s
a
i
d
North 1/2; thence Southe
r
l
y
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
E
a
s
t
l
i
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
1
1
4
of the Southwest 1/4 of
s
a
i
d
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
1
5
t
o
t
h
e
S
o
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
said Northwest 1/4 of the
S
o
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
1
/
4
;
t
h
e
n
c
e
W
e
s
t
e
r
l
y
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
South line of said Northw
e
s
t
1
/
4
o
f
t
h
e
S
o
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
1
/
4
t
o
t
h
e
a
c
t
u
a
l
point of beginning.
FORM 4,0)
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council Members
FROM:
Steve Durham, Zoning Administrator
DATE:
June 15, 1988
RE:
Eden Pointe Developer's Agreement legally known as Lot 1, Block 1, Wilson
Pointe
The mortgage company handling the financing for the above referenced property has
requested a letter from Eden Prairie confirming all portions of the Eden Pointe
Developer's Agreement have been satisfied or are in the process of being satisfied.
A resolution approved by the City Council is the proper format to accomplish this
request. The attached resolution indicates that all items of the agreement have
been satisfactorily completed.
/Mo
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-112
RECORDING CONFORMANCE WITH DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
FOR EDEN POINTE OFFICE/WAREHOUSE DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, on January 20, 1987, Welsh Companies, Inc., a Minnes
o
t
a
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
(Owner) and City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation,
e
n
t
e
r
e
d
i
n
t
o
a
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
Developer'a Agreement (Agreement) pertaining to that certain p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
t
o
a
s
EDEN POINTE and legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, WILSON PO
I
N
T
E
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
;
a
n
d
,
WHEREAS, the Owner has complied with certain provisions of sa
i
d
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
a
s
to the development of the EDEN POINTE subdivision; and,
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed the Owner's compli
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
s
a
i
d
Agreement as to Lot 1, Block 1, WILSON POINTE ADDITION a
n
d
h
a
s
s
o
a
d
v
i
s
e
d
t
h
i
s
Council;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Eden Prairie City Coun
c
i
l
t
h
a
t
a
s
t
o
Lot 1, Block 1, WILSON POINTE ADDITION, the City finds that:
All items of the Agreement have been satisfactorily completed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Agreement shall remain in f
u
l
l
f
o
r
c
e
a
n
d
effect as to all items and lots not mentioned herein.
ADOPTED by the City Council on June 21, 1988.
tary D. Peterson, Mayor
John D. Frane, Clerk
SEAL
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #88-114
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BARTH ADDITION FOR
BILL BARTH
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Barth Addition for Bill Barth, dated June 17, 1988,
consisting of 1.55 acres into two single family lots within the R1-22 Zoning
District, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance
with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and
amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 21st day of June, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Haz
-R122jjH JA
PROPOSED SITE_
1 -'1(
AREA LOCATION MAP -
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
June 10, 1988
Barth Addition
South of Hilltop Road, north of Valley Road
Bill Barth
Preliminary Plat of 1.55 acres into two single family lots.
Backgrouna
This site is currently designated on
the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide
Plan for Low Density Residential
land uses. Surrounding designations
in this area are also for Low
Density Residential. The proponent
is requesting the preliminary
platting of a 1.55-acre tract
currently zoned R1-22 into two
single family lots.
Site Plan
The site plan depicts a division of
a I.55-acre tract into two single
family lots. Lot 1 currently
accesses from Hilltop Road while Lot
2 will access from Valley Road which
is currently unimproved. Lot 1,
which is the location of the
existing house, is approximately
33,747 square feet in size, while
Lot 2 contains approximately 33,660
square feet. Both of the lots meet
the minimum requirements of the RI-
22 zoning district. Chapter 11.03,
Subdivision 3(C) states that "where
40 percent or more of the block is
developed, the required setback
shall be equal to or greater than
Barth Addition 2 June 10, 1988
the average existing setback". The average existing setback in this area is
approximately 100 feet.
The natural topography on this site slopes in a southerly direction from a high
point of 879, located along Hilltop Road to a low point of 820, adjacent Valley
Road. The proposed home design for Lot 2 is a tuck-under unit which requires the
use of two retaining walls. Because poor drainage is one of the major causes for
retaining wall failure, the proposed grading plan shall be revised to route any
drainage from flowing over the top of the wall. Detailed retaining wall plans shall
be submitted concurrent with building permit issuance.
Utilities
Since this property was zoned R1-22 prior to July 1, 1982, City water and sanitary
sewer service is not required for this site. Chapter 11.11, Subdivision 2(8) states
that "permitted uses within the R1-22 zoning district include single family detached
dwellings and accessory structures except sanitary sewer and water service shall not
be required with respect to those lands which were situated within the R1-22 zoning
district on or before July 1, 1982. This property was zoned by Ordinance #20-6,
occuring in November in 1969.
Although the subdivision of this lot will not affect the drainage patterns in this
area, there has been a history of drainage problems occuring on this site due to the
location of a low area in the northwest corner of Lot 1 where ponding occurs. The
current owner and the adjacent neighbor installed a storm sewer pipe along the
western property line to carry run-off from this low point south along the property
line for overland discharge. In order to limit any potential erosion, the
Engineering Department has recommended that the storm sewer outlet area be rip-
rapped and the natural vegetation left in place. This natural area should be at
least 20 feet in width and extend to the south property line.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the request for the Preliminary Plat of 1.55 acres
into two lots based upon plans dated May 26, 1988 and subject to the recommendations
of the Staff Report dated June 10, 1988, and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to Final Plat, proponent shall:
A. Submit storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by
the Watershed District and City Engineer. The outlet for the storm
sewer pipe shall be rip-rapped and a 20-foot natural area shall be
left intact.
B. Revise the grading plan to route any drainage from flowing over the
top of the proposed retaining walls.
2. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall :
A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
B. Submit plans for review by the Building Department for the
installation of the septic system and the well system.
C. Submit a grading and retaining wall plan for review.
I 3
Barth Addition 3 June 10, 1988
When the opportunity for water and sewer connection becomes available each
of the units shall hook up to the system at a time when the on-site systems
require repair.
4. Any structure on lot 2 shall be kept a minimum of 100 feet from the Valley
Road right-of-way.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #88-115
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF NEIL POINT FOR
JOHN B. BERGSTAD
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Neil Point for John B. Bergstad, dated June 17, 1988,
consisting of 9.1 acres into one lot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall,
is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and
Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 21st day of June, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
17))9 I
AREA LOCATION MAP f
039)
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Scott A. Kipp, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
June 10, 1988
Neil Point
South of Anderson Lakes Parkway, north of
N
e
i
l
l
L
a
k
e
,
w
e
s
t
o
f
t
h
e
Center Way extension.
John B. Bergstad
Sexton and Heim Realty
Preliminary Plat of 9.1 acres into one lot
.
Background
This property was previously
approved as the Preserve Con-
dominiums 3 and 4 in December of
1981. At that time, the property
was zoned RM-2.5 and preliminary
platted into three lots and road
right-of-way for the construction of
two apartment buildings. The
property was final platted in
October, 1986. In January, 1987,
the proponents went before the City
Council and received approval for
architectural revisions for the
buildings to achieve a more
appealing design, including a center
lobbyway/community building con-
necting the two structures.
Preliminary Plat
When the original Neil Point plat
was final platted in 1986, a lot
line ran between the two buildings
creating a separate lot for each
structure. Since these two struc-
tures are now proposed to be linked
with a main lobby area, the current
request is to replat the property in
order to remove the lot line and
create one lot.
Neill Point 2 June 10, 1988
The preliminary plat contains 9.1 acres, and meets Code requirements for lot area,
width, and depth. A portion of the easterly property line abutts the extension of
Center Way, a public road. The proponent should revise the plat to increase the
drainage and utility easement width from five feet to ten feet along the easterly
property line where Center Way abutts the property. As part of the final plat
approval, the proponent will be required to vacate that portion of drainage and
utility easement which no longer is necessary with the removal of the center lot
line.
Apartment Construction
Currently, site grading for the apartments is under way. Staff has reviewed the
three-story apartment project plans and found them to be consistent with City Code
within the RM-2.5 zoning district, with the exception of the removal of the center
lot line now being requested. The buildings are proposed to be constructed at a
43.7% Floor Area Ratio (FAR), while City Code would allow up to 50% FAR for a multi-
story building. The structure footprint occupies 14.8% of the site. A tree
inventory has been submitted for the property which indicates a 27% tree loss,
calculating into 175 caliper inches of tree replacement which is being incorporated
into the landscaping plan previously submitted.
Access
Access to the site will be from Anderson Lakes Parkway and the extension of Center
Way. The original approval for this project required that the Anderson Lakes
Parkway access be relocated for better sight distance. An on-site inspection by
Staff has determined that even with its new location, a deceleration lane for entry
into the site from the east bound lane will be necessary to remove the potential for
sudden stopping on Anderson Lakes Parkway to enter the project. The proponents
should submit detailed plans for the construction of this right turn lane prior to
City Council review.
As part of the construction of the apartment project, the proponents will also be
completing the cul-de-sac portion of the extension of Center Way lying to the east
of this property.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat of 9.1 acres into one lot
subject to the plan Staff dated May 9, 1988, this Staff Report and the following:
A. Prior to City Council, proponent shall:
1) Revise the plat to widen the drainage and utility easement from 5
feet to 10 feet for that portion that abutts the Center Way right-
of-way.
2) Submit detailed plans for the construction of a deceleration lane
for entry into the site from the eastbound lane of Anderson Lakes
Parkway.
B. Concurrent with Final Plat approval, the proponent shall:
1) Vacate that portion of drainage and utility easement which is no
longer necessary as part of the lot line removal.
Neill Point 3 June 10, 1988
II C. Concurrent with the construction of the apartment buildings, and prior to
occupancy permit issuance, the proponent shall:
1) Construct a deceleration lane for entry into the site from the
eastbound lane of Anderson lakes Parkway.
2) Construct the cul-de-sac portion of the extension of Center Way
lying to the east of the property.
0 DECELERATI- ON LANE
NEILL LAKE
\
. •
P•011
SITE PLAN
,
DECEMBER 1981
/3(o
CURRENT SITE PLAN
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-110
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF PUBLIC SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR DAYCARE SERVICES WITH GREATER
MINNEAPOLIS DAY CARE ASSOCIATION AND AUTHORIZING ASSIGNMENT OF THE AGREEMENT'S
ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES TO HENNEPIN COUNTY
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has executed a Joint Powers Agreement with
Hennepin County, thereby agreeing to participate in a grant application under the
Urban County designation provided for in the Housing and Community Development Act
of 1974; and,
WHEREAS, part of the authorized activity for Year XIV is the support of daycare
services through the administrative agency known as the Greater Minneapolis Day Care
Association; and,
WHEREAS, the Community Development Block Grant program as administered through the
Urban Hennepin County requires that each city funding daycare activity with
Community Development Block Grant monies must enter into a Public Service Agreement
with the Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association; and,
WHEREAS, the Public Service Agreement with the Greater Minneapolis Day Care
Association allows the City to authorize Hennepin County to discharge the
responsibilities of the City regarding the administration of the daycare program; .
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute an
Agreement with the Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association for child daycare
services for Year XIV of the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant
program;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Hennepin County through its Office of Planning and
Development be requested to directly discharge the responsibilities of the City
regarding the administration of this program for Year XIV, as provided for in the
Public Service Agreement.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 21, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
1331
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-118
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
NEIL POINT
WHEREAS, the plat of NEIL POINT has been submitted in a manner
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
f
o
r
platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Ch
a
p
t
e
r
4
6
2
o
f
the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had the
r
e
u
n
d
e
r
,
a
n
d
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City
p
l
a
n
a
n
d
t
h
e
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Mi
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
a
n
d
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
E
D
E
N
P
R
A
I
R
I
E
:
A. Plat approval request for NEIL POINT is approved upon complianc
e
with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this pla
t
dated JUNE 15, 1988.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy
o
f
this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above name
d
plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute t
h
e
certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon
compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on JUNE 21, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
/SZ
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician
DATE: June 15, 1988
SUBJECT: NEIL POINT
PROPOSAL: The Developer, John B. Bergstad has requested City Council approval
of the final plat of Neil Point. Located South of Anderson Lakes Pa
r
k
w
a
y
and West of Center Way in the North half of Section 23, the plat con
t
a
i
n
s
9.09 acres to be combined with Lots 1 and 2 of Baypoint II Addition fo
r
t
h
e
construction of two apartment buildings for a total of 124 reside
n
t
i
a
l
units. This project was originally presented as Baypoint II by M
i
l
l
e
r
Companies.
HISTORY: The Developer is requesting City Council approval of the preli
m
i
n
a
r
y
plat at this City Council meeting.
Zoning to RM-2.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council
o
n
December 15, 1981 per Ordinance 81-21.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed
o
n
December 15, 1981.
VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of
Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities and streets necessary
t
o
s
e
r
v
e
this site are currently in place and available for extension into th
e
site. With this proposal, the Developer is required to run a watermai
n
loop from Center Way to Anderson Lakes Parkway. This watermain will be publicly owned and maintained.
PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication shall conform to City Code requirem
e
n
t
s
.
BONDING: Bonding shall conform to City Code requirements.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Neil Point su
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement, the
s
t
a
f
f
report to the Planning Commission dated June 10, 1988 and the followi
n
g
:
1. Receipt of detailed construction plans for construction of right turn
lane and by-pass lane for entrance off of Anderson Lakes Parkway,
watermain loop from Center Way to Anderson Lakes Parkway, and cul-de-
sac terminus at Center Way.
JJ:ss
cc: John Bergstad
Miller Companies
/339
-MEMORANDUM-
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
FROM: Alan D. Gray, P.E.
City Engineer
DATE: June 16, 1988
RE:
Reimbursement to Mr. Dan Hughes
10310 Nottingham Trail
During the second week of July 1987, two significant rainst
o
r
m
e
v
e
n
t
s
t
e
s
t
e
d
the City's existing storm drainage systems. On the evening
o
f
J
u
l
y
2
0
,
1
9
8
7
,
approximately four (4) inches of rainfall occurred over most
o
f
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
.
The City Hall rain gauge recorded 3.9" of rainfall that ev
e
n
i
n
g
.
An even more significant storm occurred on the evening of July
2
3
,
1
9
8
7
.
Total rainfall from this storm event within Eden Prairie rang
e
d
f
r
o
m
6
"
t
o
i
n
excess of 10.
During both storm events an existing storm water holding pon
d
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
e
a
s
t
o
f
Franlo Road and north of Nottingham Trail reached ponding le
v
e
l
s
i
n
e
x
c
e
s
s
o
f
the 100-year flood elevation. During both events storm w
a
t
e
r
e
n
t
e
r
e
d
t
h
e
walkout level of the home located at 10310 Nottingham Trail
o
w
n
e
d
b
y
M
r
.
D
a
n
Hughes. The water entered the lower level of the struct
u
r
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
walkout patio doors at the rear of the home which faced
t
h
e
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
holding pond. The floor elevation of the walkout level is tw
o
f
e
e
t
a
b
o
v
e
t
h
e
previously established 100-year flood elevation of this hold
i
n
g
p
o
n
d
.
The rainfall event which occurred on the evening of July
2
3
,
1
9
8
7
g
r
e
a
t
l
y
exceeded a 100-year storm event. The high ponding levels and
t
h
e
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
o
f
water into the home adjacent to the holding pond were not u
n
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
e
v
e
n
t
s
given the magnitude of the storm that occurred. The sto
r
m
e
v
e
n
t
o
n
t
h
e
evening of July 20, 1987 is estimated to be of a magnitude
t
h
a
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
n
o
t
have produced ponding levels two feet higher than the
1
0
0
-
y
e
a
r
f
l
o
o
d
elevation for the pond. This observed performance sugg
e
s
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
drainage systems should be further evaluated.
With the assistance of the consultanting rirm of Hanson Thorp
P
e
l
l
i
n
e
n
O
l
s
o
n
,
Inc. the performance of this existing storm water holdin
g
p
o
n
d
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
evaluated. A computer analysis indicates that under current conditions
t
h
e
100-year flood elevation should be 853.8.
This elevation is .4 feet higher than the basement floor elevation of the Hughes home
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
1
0
3
1
0
Nottingham Trail.
1
/3q0
A review of the original design calculations indicates two deficiencies. The
original design calculations underestimated the drainage area of the pond.
Several acres westerly of Franlo Road drain to the pond through an existing
culvert under Franlo Road south of Laurel Drive. This area was not included
in the original drainage calculations. It was also estimated in the original
calculations that the storage capacity of the pond would be approximately 2.2
acre-feet between the normal water level of 849.5 and the estimated 100-year
flood elevation of 851.7. The calculations performed by HTPO indicate that
the available storage between these elevations is actually 1.5 acre-feet. An
analysis of the pond using the correct drainage area and storage capacity
results in a 100-year flood elevation of 853.8.
Since a 100-year flood elevation of 853.8 does not provide flood protection
for the Hughes home at 10310 Nottingham Trail, it is desirable to consider
alternatives that will provide adequate flood protection for this structure.
Two alternatives solutions have been considered. The first alternative is to
construct a by-pass storm sewer from this pond south to a second pond located
easterly of Franlo Road and northerly of Buckingham Drive. This alternative
would also require the excavation of additional storage capacity in the
southerly pond. The estimated cost to implement this alternative is in
excess of $100,000.00.
The second alternative would be to raise the 100-year flood elevation for the
pond to elevation 853.8 and to provide flood protection for the Hughes home
for ponding levels reaching this elevation. This would require the
elimination of the walkout level patio doors and the construction of
impermeable berm adjacent to the foundation of the home that would protect
the home from flooding when the pond reaches 100-year flood elevations. This
is a significantly more cost effective solution and would provide adequate
protection for the Hughes home.
Mr. Hughes has proceeded to implement this alternative and is requesting that
the City reimburse the costs he has incurred. Mr. Hughes has requested that
the City reimburse him $5,496.30 for labor and material costs to remove the
patio door, install block through the patio door opening and to construct an
impereable berm with landscape materials. It is hereby recommended that the
City reimburse Mr. Hughes for his expenses in the amount of $5,496.30.
The possibility that this claim would be covered by liability insurance carried
by the City has been evaluated. The City insurance policy has a deductable
of $50,000.00. For this claim no reimbursement from insurance is
obtainable.
In exchange fo,' the reimbursement as recommended above, Mr. Hughes would
agree to release the City from all further claims associated with storm
events of July 1987 and further agree to the establishment of the 100-year
flood elevation for the pond behind his home as 853.8. In addition to the
reimbursement to Mr. Hughes for expenses incurred in flood-proofing his home,
the City would also propose lowering the elevation of an overflow drainage
swab e along the easterly lot line of Mr. Hughes' property. Mr. Hughes would
agree to provide a right-of-entry for the grading work to be performed by the
City.
ADG:ss
2
CONSULTANT ENGINEERING
AGREEMENT NO. SERVICES
64918
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AGREEMENT FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES
S.P. 1002-44 and (TN 5)
2701-28
Total Fee
$ 200,000.00 Agreement between
The State of Minnesota,
Department of Transportation, and
the City of Eden Prairie
Re: Preliminary and Final Design
for T.H. 5
From C.S.A.H. 4
To C.S.A.H. 17
In Eden Prairie
INDEX
PAGE
Parties to the Agreement
3
Explanation or Justification
3
Section 1.0 - Extent and Character of the Work
4
Section 2.0 - Services to be Provided by the City
4
Section 3.0 - Laws, Regulations, Guidelines and
Standards-Form of Plans
14
Section 4.0 - Services and Data to Be Furnished to
the City by the State
18
-1-
/gLikZ
64918
INDEX PAGE
Section 5.0 - Time Schedule
19
Section 6.0 - Payment to the City
19
Section 7.0 - Termination Dispute and Submittal of
Contract Documents
22
Section 8.0 - Compliance with Laws
23
Section 9.0 - Registration
24
Section 10.0 - Conference
24
Section 11.0 - Inspection
24
Section 12.0 - Subletting
25
Section 13.0 - Claims
25
Section 14.0 - Contingent Fee
26
Section 15.0 - Nondiscrimination
27
Section 16.0 - Furnishing of Information to the State
27
Section 17.0 - Maintenance of Documents and Records
28
Section 18.0 - Use of Designs and Reports
28
Section 19.0 - Accuracy of Work
29
Section 20.0 - Approvals
29
Signatures
30
-2-
64918
This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the State of
Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as
the "State", and the City of Eden Prairie, hereinafter referred to as
the "City". Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. is referred to herein as
the "City's Consultant".
WHEREAS, the State does have this project programmed for 1991, and
WHEREAS, the City desires to accelerate the project letting date, and
WHEREAS, the City has agreed to act as administrator for the project,
and
WHEREAS, the City's final design engineering costs will be reimbursed
with State funds through this agreement between the State and the
City, and
WHEREAS, by virtue of Minnesota statute 161.20, Subdivision 2, the
Commissioner of Transportation is authorized to make agreements with
and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purpose of
constructing, maintaining and improving the trunk highway system.
-3-
,4sk&
64918
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.0 - EXTENT AND CHARACTER OF THE WORK
1.10
Project Work Description
The services to be provided under this agreement a
r
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
historical/archaeological clearance, the right of way
preacquisition process and the detail design and fi
n
a
l
construction plan preparation for roadway construct
i
o
n
w
o
r
k
,
for Trunk Highway No. 5 from CSAH 4 in Eden Prairie
t
o
C
S
A
H
17 in Chanhassen.
1.20
Project Location
1.21
The general location of the roadway element of thi
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
extends along the mainline of T.H. 5 from CSAH 4 in
E
d
e
n
Prairie to CSAH 17 in Chanhassen.
SECTION 2.0 - SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY
2.10
Scope of Services
2.11 The City, through its Consultant, will act as an ex
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
of the States work forces in the development of the
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
plans for this project.
2.20 Historical/Archaeological
2.21 The City's Consultant shall conduct all
historical/archaeological investigation to identif
y
historical/archaeological sites that may be affect
e
d
b
y
t
h
i
s
-4—
;z9v
I 64918
project and assist the State in receivi
n
g
c
l
e
a
r
a
n
c
e
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
State Historical Society.
2.30 Right of Way
2.31 The City's Consultant shall prepare a c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
u
p
-
t
o
-
d
a
t
e
right of way layout showing existing ri
g
h
t
o
f
w
a
y
l
i
m
i
t
s
,
property ownership and new right of wa
y
l
i
m
i
t
s
(
p
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
and temporary).
2.32 Title searches will be made of all the
a
f
f
e
c
t
e
d
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
to determine ownership by the City's Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
.
2.33 The City's Consultant shall make app
r
a
i
s
a
l
s
f
o
r
a
l
l
p
a
r
c
e
l
s
were there are right of way takings.
W
i
t
h
a
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
f
r
o
m
the State, the proposed right of way
w
i
l
l
b
e
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
f
o
r
the purpose of legal documentation an
d
a
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
proceedings.
2.34 All data will be forwarded to the Sta
t
e
f
o
r
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
acquisition proceedings.
2.40 Bridge Plan - Br. No. 10009 (Soo Line
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
)
2.41 The City's Consultant shall prepare a "
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
Elevation" sheet (or sheets) showing g
e
n
e
r
a
l
d
i
m
e
n
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
the structure, elevations (including hig
h
a
n
d
l
o
w
w
a
t
e
r
elevations for bridges over waterways)
,
c
l
e
a
r
a
n
c
e
s
,
architectural features, basic design da
t
a
u
s
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
preparation of the plans, a typical cro
s
s
-
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
proposed superstructure, sheet index, c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
n
o
t
e
s
,
and schedule of quantities for the en
t
i
r
e
b
r
i
d
g
e
.
-5-
64918
2.42 The City's Consultant shall prepare a "Bridge Layout" sheet
(or sheets) on which is shown by line diagram and tabulation
the principal dimensions to working points together with any
corner views, sections, and notations needed to clarify the
working point locations. The layout sheet shall also
indicate a "control point" and a reference line from which
to start the field layout of the bridge substructure units.
The layout sheet shall contain all pertinent information
needed to stake and check all working point locations in the
field. Generally, three working points shall be shown for
each substructure unit designated either by letter or
numeral.
2.43 Detail plans for each substructure unit and for the
superstructure shall include complete reinforcement bar
bending details and bar lists as well as tabulations of
quantities of items of construction work. Detailed
substructure and superstructure plans shall be tied in and
referenced to the working points specified in (2.42).
2.44 The original tracings of the field bridge survey made and
prepared by the State shall be included in the final plans.
On these sheets the City's Consultant shall, in heavy
pencil, show a sectional plan layout and centerline
sectional elevation of the proposed substructure with each
unit identified. When test piles are to be used, they shall
-6-
64918
be numbered and shown in proper plan location and also shown
to proper batter and length in the sectional elevation view.
2.45 Partially Completed Bridge Plans
2.451 The partially completed plans referred to in this agreement,
shall consist of the "General Plan and Elevation" sheet (or
sheets), the "Bridge Layout" sheet (or sheets), and the
bridge survey sheets.
2.452 For this submittal the "General Plan and Elevation" sheet
(or sheets) need be completed only to the extent necessary
to show general dimensions, elevations, architectural
features, and basic design data. The sheet shall be based
on the information to be furnished to the City's Consultant.
2.453 The "Bridge Layout" sheet (or sheets) shall show the
required corner views and sections and by line diagram
indicate the control point, reference line, and working
point locations proposed. The tabulation required on this
sheet need not be completely filled in for this submittal.
However, for the State's review, the City's Consultant shall
indicate the diagonal and other dimensions that will be
included in the final plans.
2.46 Submittal of Bridge Plans
2.461 The City's Consultant shall furnish to the State one set of
reproductions of the partially completed plans of the type
specified in Section 3.25, together with two sets of blue
-7-
64918
line prints, for consideration of the final design or
designs. A copy of any computations made for the
preparation of the partially completed plans (which may
assist the State in its review) shall be furnished with such
plans. If the State determines that major revision of the
plans is necessary, and when requested, the City's
Consultant shall prepare and furnish revised partially
completed plans.
2.462 No work on final design shall be started until the City's
Consultant has received written notice from the State
approving the partially completed plans as a basis for final
design and authorizing the City's Consultant to proceed with
the final design or designs.
2.463 When final detail plans have been completed and checked by
the City's Consultant it shall furnish the State with one
complete set of reproductions of the final plans of the type
specified in Section 3.25, together with two sets of blue
line prints of such plans, for the State's review and
approval. After the City's Consultant has made revisions
required as a result of the State's review, he shall submit
a complete set of the final plan sheets to the State for
evaluation as specified in Section 3.25.
-8-
64918
2.47 Bridge Design and Quantity Computations
2.471 One copy of checked design computations and one copy each of
two independently computed quantity computations shall be
submitted to the State for all parts of the entire structure
or structures. Bar lists shown in the plans shall be the
reconciliation of two independently itemized lists of the
number and size of pieces required by the plans. Such
itemized lists shall be submitted with the quantity
computations. Computations shall be shown on 8 1/2" x 11"
sheets insofar as practical and shall be submitted to the
State at the time reproductions of the complete plans are
submitted for review.
2.472 If a computer program, approved by the State, is used in
design computations, input and output forms with the
specific title of the computer program used may be submitted
in lieu of design computations.
2.473 If prestressed concrete beams conforming to one or more of
those shown in the State's "Bridge Detail Manual" are to be
used, the beams will be designed by the State and all design
data necessary to complete the State's standard prestressed
concrete beam plan sheets (for inclusion in the plans) will
be given the City's Consultant. However, the City's
Consultant shall furnish the State with data (i.e. proposed
beam type and spacings, span lengths, loadings, etc.) on
-9-
64918
which to base the design (or designs). Data on which to
base the design shall be submitted no later than the City's
Consultant's partially completed plans and preferably
sooner.
2.474 Concrete quantities shall be computed to the nearest
one-tenth (0.1) of a cubic yard for each individual pour
between construction joints. In addition to detailed
quantity computations for each pour, computations submitted
shall include a summation of pour quantities to indicate the
quantity of concrete of each concrete mix number for each
substructure unit, for the superstructure, and for the
entire bridge. These summations shall also be shown in the
plans.
2.475 A bill of material for structural metals together with
weight tabulations for structural metals shall be submitted
on 8-1/2" x 11" sheets insofar as practical.
2.476 Revised copies of design and quantity computations shall be
furnished when the State's review of the plans indicates
that revisions are necessary.
2.50 Detailed Design and Preparation of Roadway Plans
2.51 The City's Consultant shall prepare detailed designs and
construction contract plans that shall provide for grading,
surfacing, drainage facilities, signing, utility
relocations, traffic signals, landscaping and miscellaneous
construction features.
-10--
64918
2.52 The City's Consultant shall prepare special provisions fo
r
those items, details and procedures for which the Consult
a
n
t
is responsible and are not part of the State's "Standard
Specification for Construction".
2.53 The City's Consultant shall prepare a Signal Justificat
i
o
n
Report for four intersections on this project: 1) T.H.
5
and Dakota Ave., 2) T.H. 5 and T.H. 101, 3) T.H. 5 and C
S
A
H
17, and 4) T.H. 5 and 185th Street.
2.54 Following approval of the Signal Justification Report th
e
City's Consultant will design new signal system for thos
e
same intersections.
2.55 The City, through its Consultant, shall prepare a traffi
c
control plan which will include the identification of
detours, any temporary signing, temporary pavement marki
n
g
s
,
temporary barriers or flagging requirements.
2.56 Construction staging plans will be prepared at a scale of
1
"
to 100'. This plan will show ways to reduce traffic
congestion and maintain safe traffic flow with minimal
delay.
2.60 Plan Review and Approval
The City's Consultant shall submit the plans for review
a
n
d
approval at two stages of development:
—11—
AO 137)).
64918
2.611 Stage I (Preliminary Review)
2.6111 The City's Consultant shall submit translucent prints
of partially completed plans to the State for review.
These plans shall include existing topography, proposed
alignment, profiles, plan layout of proposed
construction, major drainage, and typical sections.
Approvals of these features by the State shall be
obtained before proceeding with further development of
the plans.
2.612 Stage It (Detail Review)
2.6121 After receiving approval of Stage I, the City's
Consultant shall complete the plans in accordance with
the review comments for Stage I and submit translucent
prints to the State for review. These plans will be
complete in all respects including computation of final
quantities.
2.6122 After the detail review by the State, the City's
Consultant shall submit the original plan sheets
corrected in accordance with the review comments.
2.6123 Approval and acceptance of the plans will be based on
the review of the completed plans in their final form.
2.6124 The City's Consultant shall submit a copy of t
h
e
checked design and quantity calculations. These
computations shall be submitted on 8-1/2" x 11" sheets
-12-
64918
as far as practicable and bound in a neat and orderly
manner.
2.70 Drainage
2.71 The City's Consultant shall design all surface and
subsurface drainage facilities including any ponding, if
necessary, that are required for the project.
2.80 Utilities
2.81 For the purpose of this agreement "Utilities" shall mean and
include all privately, publicly or cooperatively owned
communication lines and facilities; any system, lines, or
facilities for the distribution or transmission of
electrical energy, gasoline, oil, gas, water, steam, or the
exclusive collection of sewage.
2.82 The construction plans prepared by the City's Consultant
shall be complete in respect to the showing of inplace
utilities and the relocation of utilities, both privately
and publicly owned. When designs have reached the state of
progress that the effect on inplace utilities can be
determined, the City's Consultant shall furnish the State
one transparency of each plan and cross-section sheet
showing the inolace utilities and its recommendations for
such protection and relocations as may be necessary. The
final locations of all private utilities will be determined
by the State and the owners, and such information will be
-13-
1.3 CLI
II 64918
furnished to the City's Consultant who sha
l
l
s
h
o
w
s
a
i
d
n
e
w
locations in the final construction plans
i
f
t
h
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
is furnished to it prior to its completion
o
f
t
h
e
p
l
a
n
s
.
2.90 Permits
2.91 After the final design is complete, a fiel
d
i
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
involving the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Servi
c
e
,
C
o
r
p
s
o
f
Engineers and the Minnesota Department of N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
will be conducted by the City's Consultant
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
with the State to make a final determinat
i
o
n
o
n
p
e
r
m
i
t
s
required for the project.
2.92 The City's Consultant shall prepare and s
u
b
m
i
t
p
e
r
m
i
t
applications and secure the necessary fed
e
r
a
l
a
n
d
s
t
a
t
e
approval.
SECTION 3.0 - LAWS, REGULATIONS, GUIDELINE
S
A
N
D
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D
S
-
FORM OF PLANS
3.10 Design Standards
3.11 In accomplishment of this work, recognitio
n
w
i
l
l
b
e
g
i
v
e
n
t
o
the requirements of the following laws, re
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
guidelines related to design and the envir
o
n
m
e
n
t
.
These
standards, regulations or guidelines shall
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
a
s
minimum. Higher standards shall be used w
h
e
r
e
i
t
i
s
feasible and economically sound to do so.
-14-
/C--c-- ..)i
64918
3.111 Minnesota Statutes 161.171-161.177 inclus
i
v
e
(
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
Approval).
3.112 Uniform Relocation Act for Right-of Way A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
3.113 U.S. Department of Transportation, Federa
l
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
Administration, Federal-Aid Program manual
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
:
Book III, Volume 6, Chapter 2, Section 1,
S
u
b
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
1
(Design Standards for Federal-Aid Projects
)
3.114 National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
-
P
u
b
l
i
c
L
a
w
91-190.
3.115 Section 4(f) of Public Law 89-670.
3.116 Minnesota Statutes, Section 1160.01 et. se
q
.
(Environmental Policy Act of 1973).
3.117 State of Minnesota, Department of Transpor
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
Highway Project Development process.
3.12 Applicable requirements of Division II (Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Details) of the Minnesota Department of Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
"Standard Specifications for Highway Const
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
"
1
9
8
3
Edition or future editions thereof, on fil
e
i
n
t
h
e
O
f
f
i
c
e
o
f
the Commissioner of Transportation at St.
P
a
u
l
,
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
,
and which are made a part hereof by reference with the same
force and effect as though fully set forth
h
e
r
e
i
n
,
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
incorporated into the preliminary plans pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
City, through its Consultant.
-15-
64918
3.13 Where applicable, design details sha
l
l
c
o
n
f
o
r
m
t
o
t
h
o
s
e
i
n
the Minnesota Department of Transpor
t
a
t
i
o
n
"
R
o
a
d
D
e
s
i
g
n
Manual", "Surveying and Mapping Man
u
a
l
"
,
"
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
M
a
n
u
a
l
"
(5-294), "Standard Plans" (5-296), "S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
P
l
a
n
s
"
,
"Traffic Enginering Manual", the pr
e
s
e
n
t
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
thereof, as well as future modificat
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
n
e
w
e
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
thereof, which will be issued from t
i
m
e
t
o
t
i
m
e
b
y
t
h
e
Minnesota Department of Transportati
o
n
.
3.14 Insofar as design standards are co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
,
i
t
i
s
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
n
t
of this agreement that the plans shal
l
e
m
b
o
d
y
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
standards in use by the Minnesota De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
Tranportation at the time the design
w
o
r
k
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
l
a
n
s
i
s
being performed. If revised design
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
a
r
e
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
b
y
the Minnesota Department of Transp
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
progress of the work on the plans, th
e
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
Engineer or appointed representati
v
e
w
i
l
l
a
t
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
o
f
the State, analyze jointly with the
C
i
t
y
,
t
h
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
plans necessary to comply with the
n
e
w
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
S
a
i
d
agreed changes will be included in t
h
e
p
l
a
n
s
.
3.20 Forms of Plans
3.21 The style and form of plans includi
n
g
s
i
z
e
,
w
e
i
g
h
t
s
,
a
n
d
style of lettering shall be that in u
s
e
b
y
t
h
e
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
Department of Transportation at the
t
i
m
e
t
h
e
w
o
r
k
i
s
b
e
i
n
g
performed unless written permissio
n
i
s
g
i
v
e
n
t
o
v
a
r
y
s
a
i
d
-16-
64918
form and style. The plans shall be prepared on 22 inch by
34 inch or 11 inch by 17 inch sheets.
3.22 The final submittal of plan sheets shall be on mylar
material.
3.23 Cross-section sheets prepared by the City's Consultant shall
be either computer or hand-plotted. The submitted cross
sections shall be on the same size sheets as the plan
(Section 3.21). If hand-plotted they shall be drawn with
pencil or India ink on the best grade of paper sheets having
dotted grid lines. The original ground line shall be inked.
The planned sections may be drafted with pencil.
3.24 The drafting on the plan sheets and cross section sheets
shall be of such size and quality as will permit reduction
to one-half scale and the making of readable, first class
blue line or black line prints from the reduced size
intermediates, including clear reproduction of grid lines,
symbols and legends. The minimum letting size for original
drafting shall be 0.12 inch. No adhesive backed material
shall remain on any plan sheet. Bar scales will be used
throughout the plan.
3.25 Bridge plans, partially completed and final detail plans
submitted to the State for review and approval shall be
positive reproductions on diazo sensitive transulcent paper
or polyester base film from which blue line prints can be
made.
-17-
13g
64918
SECTION 4. 0 - DATA, AND SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED BY THE
STATE
4.10 Data to be Furnished
4.11 The State, after authorizing the start of the project, shall
furnish the following project related data or materials, if
any, for use by the City in connection with the project.
4.1101 Complete bridge and roadway field survey work and
mapping, done earlier by the State.
4.1102 Complete soils boring information and soils recommend
letter.
4.1103 Any other material or data available for use in
performing the services under this agreement.
4.12 All data furnished to the City by the State shall remain the
property of the State and shall be returned to the State
when so requested.
4.20 Analysis and Evaluation of Data by the City
4.21 The City's Consultant shall make an analysis of all data and
information furnished by the State. If any data or
information is found to be incorrect or incomplete this fact
should be brought to the attention of the State before
proceeding further with the part of the project affected.
4.30 Services to be Provided
4.31 The State shall be responsible for advising the City of the
required pavement design for the project.
-18-
64918
4.32 The State shall be responsible for soils investigat
i
o
n
a
n
d
shall provide boring logs, recommended subcut depths
a
n
d
subqrade treatments to the City for final design.
SECTION 5.0 - TIME SCHEDULE
5.10 Starting Work
5.11 For the services that the State is paying for the
C
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
not start work until it receives written instructio
n
s
t
o
d
o
so from the State.
5.20 Completion Time Schedule
5.21 The City's Consultant shall complete all work and s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
required under the terms of this agreement by Novem
b
e
r
1
,
1989.
5.22 The State may extend the time completion periods upo
n
written request from the City for delays encountered
t
h
a
t
are beyond his control. The amount of such time ext
e
n
s
i
o
n
shall be determined by the Consultant Agreements En
g
i
n
e
e
r
o
f
the Minnesota Department of Transportation who is aut
h
o
r
i
z
e
d
to grant such time extension by letter to the City.
SECTION 6.0 - PAYMENT TO THE CITY
6.10 Payment to the City for Consultant Services
6.11 The State shall pay the City as compensation in f
u
l
l
f
o
r
t
h
e
services performed by the firm of Barton-Aschman A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
,
-19-
Wa d
64918
Inc., the "City's Consultant", under this agreement the lump
sum amount of $200,000.00.
In addition, the following entities shall pay the following
amounts as compensation for the services performed by the
City's Consultant:
1. Southwest Coalition $75,000.00
2. City of Chanhassen $50,000.00
3. City of Eden Prairie $50,000.00
4. City of Chaska $20,000.00
5. City of Waconia $15,000.00
6. County of Hennepin $10,000.00
7. County of Carver $10,000.00
The total compensation to be paid to the City's Consultant
shall be $430,000.00. Notwithstanding any term or condition
contained in this Agreement to the contrary, the City shall
have no obligation to do anything or perform any act until
and unless the State and all of the other entities make the
payments as required by this paragraph. In the event that
either the State or any of the entities fail to make the
payments set forth above, then the City's obligations under
this Agreement shall be rendered void and unenforceable.
6.12 If it appears at any time that the City's Consultant will
exceed the total estimated payment of $430,000, the City's
Consultant agrees not to perform any services that would
-20-
44- /3(01
64918
cause that amount to be exceeded unless the City's
Consultant has been advised by the City that additional
funds have been encumbered, a supplemental agreement has
been issued and that work may proceed. It shall be the
responsibility of the City to originate all requests for
additional encumbrances, compensation, and for supplemental
agreements.
6.20 Invoices - Partial Payments
6.21 The City may submit invoices monthly during the progress of
the work for costs incurred by the City's Consultant. The
State will pay sixty (60) percent of the total invoiced
amount as the State's share up to the maximum amount as
noted in 6.11.
6.22 Signed invoices are to be submitted to the District Project
Manager for approval.
6.23 The State will pay 100% of the State's share on partial
payments to the City up to Ninety-Eight (98) percent of the
total lump sum as stated in 6.11.
6.30 Final Payment
6.31 Final payment due the City for the Consultant Services will
be made after acceptance of the work and an audit conducted
by the State. The audit will be conducted in accordance
with the cost principles and procedures set forth in the
Federal Acquisition Regulations, 48CFR 1-31.6 (Grants and
-21-
/30
64918
Contracts with State and Local Governments) and 48CFR 1-31.2
(Contracts with Commercial Organizations), which are made a
part hereof by reference with the same force and effect as
though fully set forth herein.
6.40 Progress Reports
6.41 The City's Consultant shall submit monthly reports to the
State showing progress of the work. A copy of the reports
form to be used by the City's Consultant will be submitted
to the State for approval.
SECTION 7.0 - TERMINATION, DISPUTE AND SUBMITTAL OF CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS
7.10 Termination and Dispute
7.11 The agreement may be terminated by either party at any time
upon written notice to the other party. In the event that
such termination should take place at a time other than the
completion of the work to be performed under the agreement,
the City shall be paid for the work performed to date of
termination, demobilization costs, and contract closing
costs, and (if applicable) a portion of the fixed fee which
will be determined by the stage of completion of the total
work. The total payment will be determined by mutual
agreement between the State and the City. The total payment
for the reduced quantity of work, demobilization expense and
-22-
64918
contract closing costs will not exceed the total payments as
set forth in the original agreement or succeeding
supplements. A supplemental agreement shall be executed
setting forth the reduced amount of compensation the City
shall receive. The City may exercise those legal remedies
as may be available to it in connection with any dispute
arising out of this agreement which cannot be settled by the
parties hereto by supplemental agreement.
7.20 Submittal of Contract Documents
7.21 The original of all drawings, work sheets, plans, field
notes, computations and other project data shall be turned
over to the State as follows:
7.211 Upon written notice of termination of the agreement:
7.212 Prior to final settlement of a dispute arising out of
this agreement.
7.213 Prior to final payment of the ultimate gross amount
due.
SECTION 8.0 - COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
8.10
8.11 The City's Consultant shall comply with all Federal, State
and local laws, together with all ordinances and regulations
applicable to the work. The City's Consultant shall procure
all licenses, permits, or other rights necessary for the
fulfillment of the City's obligations under this agreement.
-23-
13log
64918
SECTION 9.0 - REGISTRATION
9.10
9.11 Plans, designs, reports and specifications sh
a
l
l
b
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
by or under the direct supervison of a profes
s
i
o
n
a
l
engineer, architect or land surveyor as applic
a
b
l
e
,
registered in the State of Minnesota. The pl
a
n
s
,
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
,
reports and specifications shall be certified
a
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
b
y
law.
SECTION 10.0 - CONFERENCES
10.10 The City's Consultant shall confer with the S
t
a
t
e
a
s
o
f
t
e
n
as is necessary in regard to the work to be do
n
e
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
i
s
agreement and perform the travel necessary f
o
r
s
u
c
h
conferences. When requested by the State, t
h
e
C
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
also assist the State in negotiations with o
t
h
e
r
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
e
d
parties.
SECTION 11.0 - INSPECTION
11.10 Duly authorized representatives of the State
a
n
d
t
h
e
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
Highway Administration shall have the right
t
o
i
n
s
p
e
c
t
t
h
e
work of the City and its Consultant whenever
t
h
e
y
d
e
e
m
i
t
necessary.
-24-
(ergt, 1866
64918
SECTION 12.0 - SUBLETTING
12.10 The services of the City's Consultant to be performed
hereunder are personal and shall not be assigned, su
b
l
e
t
,
o
r
transferred unless written authority to do so is grant
e
d
b
y
the State. This written consent shall in no way relie
v
e
t
h
e
City's Consultant from the primary responsibility for
performance of the work. The State does recognize and
approve the use of the City's Consultant, Barton-Aschm
a
n
Associates, Inc. for the services to be provided unde
r
t
h
i
s
agreement.
12.12 All subconsultant agreements exceeding 610,000 shall c
o
n
t
a
i
n
all required provisions of this agreement.
SECTION 13.0 - CLAIMS
13.10 City's Employees
13.11 Any and all employees of the City or other persons w
h
i
l
e
engaged in the performance of any work or services re
q
u
i
r
e
d
by the City under this agreement shall not be consider
e
d
employees of the State, and any and all claims that m
a
y
o
r
might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of Mi
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
on behalf of said employees or other persons while so
engaged, and any and all claims made by any third par
t
y
a
s
a
consequence of any act or omission on the part of the
C
i
t
y
'
s
employees or other persons while so engaged on any of
t
h
e
-25-
4-41- 134 6
64918
work or services to be rendered shall in no way be the
obligation or responsibility of the State.
13.20 Responsibility for Claims and Liability
13.21 The City warrants that the following paragraph will be
included in their agreement with Barton-Aschman, the City's
Consultant.
13.22 The City's Consultant indemnifies, saves and holds harmless
the State and City and any agents or employees thereof from
any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of action of
whatsoever nature or character arising out of or by reason
of the execution or performance of the work of the City's
Consultant provided for under this agreement.
SECTION 14.0 - CONTINGENT FEE
14.10
14.11 The City's Consultant warrant that it has not employed or
retained any company or person, other than bona fide
employees working solely for the City's Consultant to
solicit or secure this contract, and that it has not paid or
agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide
employee working solely for them, any fee, commission/
percentage, brokerage fee, gifts or any other consideration
/
contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of the
agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty the
-26-
i3(11
64918
State shall have the right to annul this agreement without
liability or, in its discretion, to deduct from the contract
price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full
amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee,
gift, or contingent fee.
SECTION 15.0 - NONDISCRIMINATION
15.10 The provisions of Minnesota Statute 181.59 and of any
applicable ordinance relating to civil rights and
discrimination shall be considered part of this agreement as
if fully set forth herein.
SECTION 16.0 - FURNISHING OF INFORMATION TO THE STATE
16.10 Advance Information
16.11 At the request of the State, the City's Consultant shall
furnish to the State during the progress of the work such
design information or data in such detail as may be required
to enable the State to carry out or to proceed with related
phases of the project not covered by this Agreement, or
which may be necessary to enable the State to furnish
information to the City upon which to proceed with further
work.
-27-
JP44'
64918
SECTION 17.0 - MAINTENANCE OF DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS
17.10
17.11 The City's Consultant shall maintain all books, documents,
papers, accounting records and other evidence pertaining to
cost incurred in connection with work and services performe
d
hereunder. The City's Consultant shall make such material
available at its office at all reasonable times during th
e
contract period and for three years from the date of fin
a
l
payment under this agreement for inspection by the State,
the Federal Highway Administration, or any authorized
representative of the Federal Government and copies there
o
f
shall be furnished upon request.
SECTION 18.0 - USE OF DESIGNS AND REPORTS
18.10
18.11 All designs, reports and copies of design computations sh
a
l
l
become the property of the State who shall have the right
t
o
use any and all of said plans or designs for this intended
public purpose.
18.12 The City's Consultant will make themselves available durin
g
construction to answer questions about the plans as
designed. Such time on the Consultants part will not
constitute extra work and no additional compensation is
warranted.
-28-
_ago- 3 60
64918
SECTION 19.0 - ACCURACY OF WORK
19.10
19.11 The City's Consultant shall be responsible for the
a
c
c
u
r
a
c
y
of the work and shall promptly make necessary revi
s
i
o
n
s
o
r
corrections resulting from errors and omissions on
t
h
e
i
r
part without additional compensation. Acceptance o
f
t
h
e
work by the State will not relieve the City's Cons
u
l
t
a
n
t
o
f
the responsibility for subsequent correction of any
s
u
c
h
errors and the clarification of any ambiguities.
SECTION 20.0 - APPROVALS
20.10
20.11 Before this agreement shall become binding and effe
c
t
i
v
e
,
i
t
shall be approved by resolution of the City Council
o
f
E
d
e
n
Prairie and receive the approval of such State offi
c
e
r
s
a
s
the law may require in addition to the Commissioner
o
f
Transportation.
-29-
13 )0
AGREEMENT NO. 64918
City of Eden Prairie Agreement
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this contract to be
duly executed intending to be bound thereby.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
By:
Commissioner of Administration
Date:
By:
By:
Date:
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY
Date:
Commissioner of Finance
By:
Date:
Assistant City Attorney
AS TO FORM & EXECUTION
Special Assistant Attorney General
Department of Transportation
By:
Title:
Date:
-30-
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
City Manager Carl J. Jullie
Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson
Quotes for Refuse Collection from City Facilities
June 15, 1988
Quotes have been received from four firms to collect refuse from City
facilities. It was expected that placing all of the City's refuse hauling
accounts under one contract would result in better pricing and administrative
economy in the processing of invoices. Quotes requested assumed that the
successful hauler would collect from all City facilities over an 18-month
period. Alternate pricing was also requested to have the City's refuse
delivered to the Reuter Resource Recycling facility so that the wastes may be
separated for recycling and conversion to fuel.
A tabulation of the quotes follows:
Monthly Charge w/Landfilling Monthly Charge w/Reuter
Gen.fund Enterprise Total Gen.Fund Enterprise Total
Buckingham
Disposal
BFI Waste
Systems
Quality Waste
Control
$354.75 $229.50 $584.25 $473.00 $306.00 $779.00
440.00 210.00 650.00 NO BID
451.00 309.00 762.00 483.00 326.00 809.00
Waste Mgmt.-
Savage 491.00 344.00 835.00 545.00 382.00 927.00
The General Fund (i.e., taxes) would pick up the collection costs for the City
Offices, Police Station, three fire stations, Community Center, and
Streets/Parks Maintenance building. The Enterprise operations include the Water
Plant and Preserve Liquor Store. To cost out the 18-month service based on the
low quote from Buckingham Disposal:
w/Landfill w/Reuter
Gen. Fund $ 6,386 $ 8,514
Enterprise 4,131 5 ,508
Total $10,517 $14,022
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Buckingham Disposal, Inc. be awarded the
refuse hauling service from City facilities in accordance wtih its quote for
service through December 31, 1989. In order to maintain its commitment to
setting an example in recycling, it is further recommended that the Council
designate that this refuse be delivered to the Reuter Resource Recycling
facility.
CWD:jdp
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Sandra F. Werts, Recreation Supervisor
DATE:
June 14, 1988
SUBJECT: Cummins-Grill Homestead
The Historical and Cultural Commission
h
a
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
t
o
address two Commission related issues: 1
)
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
n
t
e
r
a
t
t
h
e
Cummins-Grill House and installation of a
s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
s
y
s
t
e
m
,
a
n
d
2
)
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
with the Historical and Cultural Commissio
n
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
o
f
restoration of historic sites.
TERMINATION OF RENTER AT CUMMINS-GRILL HOMESTEAD & REQU
E
S
T
F
O
R
A
U
T
H
O
R
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
TO INSTALL A SECURITY SYSTEM
Ever since Mrs. Grill moved out of the hou
s
e
a
t
1
3
6
0
0
P
i
o
n
e
e
r
T
r
a
i
l
,
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
has had a renter in the house for upkee
p
a
n
d
s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
s
.
T
h
i
s
h
a
s
been an encumbrance to the Restoration
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
,
a
s
t
h
e
y
h
a
v
e
t
r
i
e
d
t
o
promote the restoration of the house. Resto
r
a
t
i
o
n
w
o
r
k
a
t
o
n
e
t
i
m
e
f
o
r
c
e
d
t
h
e
renter out of the house for a six week per
i
o
d
o
f
t
i
m
e
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
h
a
s
been unable to show the house on a regular b
a
s
i
s
.
The current renter has given the City the
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
6
0
d
a
y
n
o
t
i
c
e
,
a
n
d
h
e
i
s
expected to move out by the beginning of
A
u
g
u
s
t
.
T
h
e
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
and Historical and Cultural Commissio
n
h
a
d
a
l
r
e
a
d
y
b
e
g
u
n
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
n
g
terminating the renter's lease. The curren
t
s
i
t
u
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
e
v
i
a
t
e
s
t
h
e
n
e
e
d
t
o
do this. At this time, the recommends the
C
i
t
y
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
s
y
s
t
e
m
a
n
d
illuminate the house with exterior lightin
g
.
T
h
e
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
h
a
s
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
t
w
o
quotes for security systems. The low quote
i
s
$
1
,
6
8
0
.
Although, the interior of the house nee
d
s
a
l
o
t
o
f
w
o
r
k
,
t
h
e
r
o
o
m
s
o
n
t
h
e
lower level are usable. The Restoratio
n
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
h
a
s
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
f
o
r
h
o
u
s
e
tours during Sunbonnet Day this year a
n
d
w
o
u
l
d
l
i
k
e
t
o
i
n
i
t
i
a
t
e
m
o
n
t
h
l
y
interpretive programs during the fall.
DISCUSSION WITH THE HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL COMMISSI
O
N
R
E
G
A
R
D
I
N
G
T
H
E
C
I
T
Y
COUNCIL SUPPORT OF RESTORATION OF HISTORIC SITES
The Restoration Committee was established
i
n
1
9
8
2
t
o
w
o
r
k
o
n
t
h
e
r
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
of the Cummins-Grill Homestead. In the
s
u
b
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
y
e
a
r
s
,
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
h
a
s
found it to be a prodigious undertaking.
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
v
e
r
y
e
x
p
e
n
s
i
v
e
,
A 1979 estimate to complete the projec
t
a
t
o
n
e
t
i
m
e
w
a
s
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
$150,000. Restoring the house in phases
i
s
e
v
e
n
m
o
r
e
e
x
p
e
n
s
i
v
e
.
G
r
a
n
t
s
a
r
e
almost nonexistent, and fund raising h
a
s
b
e
e
n
a
f
r
u
s
t
r
a
t
i
n
g
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
T
h
e
Restoration Committee has never viewed its
e
l
f
a
s
a
f
u
n
d
r
a
i
s
i
n
g
c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
Three phases of work have been completed
t
o
d
a
t
e
:
P
h
a
s
e
I
-
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
the roof, Phase II - tuckpointing, res
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
w
i
n
d
o
w
s
a
n
d
d
o
o
r
s
a
n
d
installation of a heating system; and Phas
e
I
I
I
-
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
f
o
r
r
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
reconstruction of the porches and an inter
p
r
e
t
a
t
i
v
e
p
l
a
n
.
T
h
e
s
e
p
h
a
s
e
s
h
a
r
d
l
y
touch on what needs to be done to complete
l
y
r
e
s
t
o
r
e
t
h
e
h
o
u
s
e
.
The City also owns the home of Earl and Hele
n
M
o
r
e
a
t
8
1
0
7
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
R
o
a
d
,
and may soon become the owner of the Riley
h
o
u
s
e
o
n
R
i
l
e
y
L
a
k
e
R
o
a
d
.
T
h
i
s
house is part of the purchase now being nego
t
i
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
M
r
s
.
J
a
c
q
u
e
s
f
o
r
l
a
n
d
to complete Riley Lake Park.
The Historical and Cultural Commission rec
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
i
r
J
u
n
e
2
,
1
9
8
8
meeting to "Request the City Council to co
n
v
e
n
e
a
j
o
i
n
t
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
Historical and Cultural Commission and Resto
r
a
t
i
o
n
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
of discussing the restoration of the Cummin
s
-
G
r
i
l
l
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
C
i
t
y
historic sites."
The Commission suggests that the meeting be h
e
l
d
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
scheduled for July 19th.
SFW:md
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recre
a
t
i
o
n
&
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Sandy Werts, Recreation Supervisor
May 18, 1988
Termination of Lease with Renter at
t
h
e
C
u
m
m
i
n
s
-
G
r
i
l
l
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
The past three months the Restora
t
i
o
n
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
n
g
t
h
e
restoration plans for the Cummins-Gr
i
l
l
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
a
n
d
s
e
t
t
i
n
g
t
i
m
e
t
a
b
l
e
s
f
o
r
the desired completion of the pr
o
j
e
c
t
.
T
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
,
t
h
e
committee has strongly expressed t
h
e
i
r
d
e
s
i
r
e
t
o
h
a
v
e
t
h
e
r
e
n
t
e
r
o
u
t
o
f
t
h
e
house.
Having the building vacated would
a
l
l
o
w
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
t
o
a
r
r
a
n
g
e
t
o
u
r
s
f
o
r
Scout and school groups, and to begin some interpretive programs.
T
h
e
b
i
g
g
e
s
t
disappointment people have at Sunb
o
n
n
e
t
D
a
y
i
s
n
o
t
b
e
i
n
g
a
b
l
e
to tour the house.
It will be many years before the h
o
u
s
e
i
s
t
o
t
a
l
l
y
r
e
s
t
o
r
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
must depend on grants, donations and
f
u
n
d
r
a
i
s
e
r
s
.
H
a
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
h
o
u
s
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
may help in developing the interest
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
A subcommittee of the Restoration Com
m
i
t
t
e
e
h
a
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
a
n
i
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
i
v
e
p
l
a
n
,
which is attached to this memo. Th
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
i
s
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
h
a
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
h
o
u
s
e
available for monthly programs in
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
,
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
,
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
a
n
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
1988. The house would be closed fo
r
t
h
e
w
i
n
t
e
r
.
M
a
n
y
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
s
i
t
e
s
a
r
e
closed during the winter to cut ba
c
k
o
n
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
c
o
s
t
s
a
n
d
a
t
t
e
n
d
a
n
c
e
t
e
n
d
s
to be lighter.
The committee would like to see
a
s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
s
y
s
t
e
m
a
n
d
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
installed prior to the renter movi
n
g
o
u
t
.
T
w
o
q
u
o
t
e
s
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
f
o
r
the security system. Steve White,
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
P
o
l
i
c
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
,
w
o
u
l
d
r
e
v
i
e
w
the final plans, to insure that the
s
y
s
t
e
m
i
s
w
h
a
t
i
s
a
c
t
u
a
l
l
y
n
e
e
d
e
d
.
W
h
i
t
e
has recommended that the lights be p
l
a
c
e
d
s
o
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
e
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
o
f
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
is illuminated.
I'd like to clarify a few point
s
i
n
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
i
v
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
The interpretive plan recommends hirin
g
a
p
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
,
p
a
r
t
-
t
i
m
e
c
u
r
a
t
o
r
i
n
t
h
e
spring of 1990. One of the things t
h
e
c
u
r
a
t
o
r
w
o
u
l
d
d
o
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
the committee is help develop two to
t
h
r
e
e
"
p
a
c
k
a
g
e
d
"
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
f
o
r
g
r
o
u
p
s
,
s
o
that if a Scout or Rotary group wa
n
t
e
d
t
o
c
o
m
e
t
o
t
h
e
h
o
u
s
e
f
o
r
a
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
they could select, for example,
"
E
a
r
l
y
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
H
i
s
t
o
r
y
"
,
"
F
a
r
m
i
n
g
Practices from the Turn of the Cent
u
r
y
"
,
o
r
"
I
n
d
i
a
n
T
a
l
e
s
f
r
o
m
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
"
.
This could be part of the responsi
b
i
l
i
t
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
a
r
t
-
t
i
m
e
c
u
r
a
t
o
r
h
i
r
e
d
i
n
1989.
I would like to meet with you, at
y
o
u
r
e
a
r
l
i
e
s
t
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
,
s
o
t
h
a
t
w
e
c
a
n
discuss this further.
SFW:md
DRAFT REPORT
PROPOSED INTERPRETIVE PROGRAM FOR CUMMINS-GRILL HOMESTEAD
Summer 1988
Summer 1988
August 1988
September 1988
October 1988
November 1988
December 1988
Hire person to put together a manual for tour guides that
would include: neighborhood, local, regional, state and
national history, as guides must be able to relate to
times; background information on Cummins, Phipps and
Grill families; history of restoration project to date.
Garden program for 7-11 year olds "Seed, Weed & Feed".
Components: plan, plant, weed, and harvest garden; build
scarecrow; enter and attend County Fair; talk by Master
Gardener.
Place: outside at Cummins-Grill House
Time: Thursdays, 10-11:30 a.m. every other week beginning
June 9 thru September 1
Volunteer Guide Training
Sunbonnet Day House Tour
Great Pumpkin Hunt
Pie Baking & House Tour
Christmas Traditions in Eden Prairie - same time as
Holiday Salute - have sleigh rides from Staring Lake Park
to Cummins-Grill House and back.
Jan. thru Apr./89 House closed for winter
Hire part-time curator to plan interpretive programs for
summer. Person would work full-time June thru August.
Monthly Program
Weekly programs for children, family and adults with paid
and volunteer staff.
Feb.-March 1989
May 1989
June-Aug. 1989
Sept.-Dec. 1989 . Monthly programs
. Open to groups for tours by reservation
. Open to groups for meetings
Jan.-April 1990 . Closed for restoration
• Hire permanent part-time curator
. Develop 2-3 programs for groups
Role of Curator: Plan programs, do research necessary to authenticate
programs, recruit and train part-time staff and
volunteers, fund raising, promotion, oversee restoration,
etc.
1S 740
AUTOMATIC
ALARM
CORPORATION
7030 Second Street N W
Saint Louis Palk, MN 55426
(612)927-5000
SCHOEN SECURITY COMPANIES
December 14, 1987
Mona Leppla
10010 pioneer Trail
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Mona:
I want to thank you for giving me the opportunity of speaking with you concerning
the installation of a security system in the historic home at 13600 Pioneer Trail.
I have designed two systems for the house and have worked out the proposals for them
both.
System fl
This system will contain the following equipment and sensors.
1 - Main Electronics Enclosure. (#2730) This is the main brain of the system.
It is generally mounted in the basement.
1 - Control panel. this is the panel that allows you to arm and disarm the
system as you come and go. It also allows you to perform the other functions
that are listed in the borchure. •
6 - Door sensored. this is an absolute must. All the outside doors will
be sensored. this includes the cellar door.
4 - Basement windows will be sensored because the odds are much greater that
an entry will occur at these windows.
3 - Passive Infrared "beams". This system will include the installation
of "beams" in the following areas. One in the living room, another in
the kitchen, and the last one in the parlor, these devices have been
very citable and it is unlikely that you will have any problems with them.
2 - Smoke detectors will be included in the system.
1 - Low temperature detector will be included.
System 12
The second system is exactly like the first except in this system I have
added detectors to all of the first floor windows. Having all of these windows
sensored will require the installation of only one "beam" instead of the
three in the first system.. Other than that everything is the same. H
The investment required for the installation of the first system is $1870.00 plus
tax if you are taxable.
13'1')
9036 GRAND AVENUE SOUTI
BLOOMINGTON, MN 53420
January 7th, 1988
SecuritY • • • (612) 881.LOCK
Mona Leppla
10010 Pioneer Trail
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55337
Dear Ms. Leppla:
Confirming our recent survey regarding Cummins-Grill Homestead,
we propose the following Residential Security System.
Various areas to be protected:
1 - Front door to parlor, contact
1 - Front door to living room, contact
1 - East door to parlor, contact
1 - Cellar door, west, contact
1 - Porch door, west, contact
1 - Porch door, north, contact
1 - Motion detector, living room
1 - Motion detector, parlor
1 - Smoke detector, first floor hallway
1 - Heat detector, kitchen
1 - Smoke detector, basement/furnace area
2 - Smoke detectors, second floor areas
1 - Low temperature alarm device
Also included in the alarm system will be:
1 Subscriber's 6112 control unit with digital alarm commun-
icator. In the event of an alarm condition, a signal is
transmitted to our Central Station. Upon receipt of this
signal, Floyd Security will notify the proper authorities
and anyone you may care to designate.
1 Interior alarm sounder
1 Outside alarm siren
1 - 620 command center, digital touchpad control center
Floyd Security will sell, install and place into operation the
above residential security system, as per the enclosed purchase
agreement, for ONE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED EIGHTY DOLLARS and
no/100 ($1,680.00) and TWENTY DOLLARS and no/100 ($20.00) per
month monitoring charge.
Included in the monthly monitoring charges are the following!
All necessary telephone wire facilities;
24 hour monitoring;
All normal maintenance required to keep the alarm in oper-
ating condition.
g beE/cti r -ity .4 /arms
I
*
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-116
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE HIDDEN GLEN IV
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT
TO THE OVERALL HIDDEN GLEN NORTH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for
the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located wit
h
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
;
a
n
d
,
WHEREAS, the Hidden Glen IV development is considered a pr
o
p
e
r
a
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
t
o
the overall Hidden Glen North Planned Unit Development Conc
e
p
t
;
a
n
d
,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a publ
i
c
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
o
n
t
h
e
request of Derrick Companies for PUD Concept Amendment
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
t
o
t
h
e
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
Hidden Glen North Planned Unit Development Concept
f
o
r
t
h
e
H
i
d
d
e
n
G
l
e
n
I
V
development and recommended approval of the PUD Concep
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on June 2
1
,
1
9
8
8
;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council
o
f
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
.
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Hidden Glen IV development PUD Concept Amendment
,
b
e
i
n
g
i
n
Hennepin County, Minnesota, and legally described as o
u
t
l
i
n
e
d
i
n
Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
t
o
the overall Hidden Glen North Planned Unit Development
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
a
s
outlined in the application materials for Hidden Glen IV.
3. That the PUD Concept Amendment meets the recommendatio
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
Planning Commission dated May 23, 1988.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 21st day
o
f
J
u
n
e
,
1
9
8
8
.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
STAFF REPORT
Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
April 22, 1988
Hidden Glen IV Addition
South of Townline Road, west of Dell Road, east of Highway #101
Derrick Land Company
1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 68 acres.
2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 68 acres with
variances.
3. Zoning District Change from RM-6.5 to R1-9.5 on 10.21 acres.
4. Preliminary Plat of 10.21 acres into 40 single family lots,
3 outlots, and road right-of-way.
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Background
This site is guided Medium Density
Residential and zoned RM-6.5 for 38
twinhome units. This site is part
of the 68-acre Hidden Glen North PUD
(approved in 1986) which is a
mixture of R1-13.5 lots, R1-9.5
lots, twinhomes, and a small
commercial area.
Site Plan
The site plan involves the con-
struction of 40, R1-9.5 lots.
Outlot A and E are needed for
Highway #101 right-of-way. Since
the developer is proposing to sell
outlots A and E to the County, this
land area cannot be included in the
calculation for net density. The
density, based upon the net land
area of 8.58 acres, is 4.66 units
per acre. If the Highway #101
AREA LOCATION MAP
/,(0
Hidden Glen IV Addition 2 April 22, 1988
right-of-way is to be dedicated with the project, this land area co
u
l
d
b
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
in the density calculation, meaning the project density would be 3.9
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
.
The maximum density allowed in the R1-9.5 zoning district is 3-1/2
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
.
This would allow up to 30 units on a 8.58-acre site.
Planned Unit Development Variances
Variances are being requested for lot size from 9,500 square feet t
o
5
,
2
0
0
s
q
u
a
r
e
feet, lot width from 70 feet to 44 feet, and density from 3.5 to
4
.
6
6
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
acre. The proponents have not provided a substantiation for the gr
a
n
t
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
variances. Since the variances are being requested through the PUD,
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Commission must make a recommendation to the City Council. Se
c
t
i
o
n
1
1
.
4
0
,
Subdivision 11, Paragraph C, of the City Code, states that "any exe
m
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
Code through the PUO must be justified through the design of the proj
e
c
t
"
.
I
n
o
t
h
e
r
words, would the granting of the variances result in a better projec
t
t
o
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
than if no variances were granted at all?
Variances through PhD's have been granted before when there is an
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
C
i
t
y
benefit such as preserving natural features creating buffer zones
o
r
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
transition, specialized architecture, and landscaping.
Planned Unit Development Land Use Amendment
The Planning Commission is requested to review a change in land
u
s
e
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
approved PUD plan for 38 twinhome units to accommodate 40 small lot R
1
-
9
.
5
u
n
i
t
s
.
The twinhome plan provided housing variety within the overall 68-acre
P
U
D
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
large consolidated space between the units, and provided buffering to
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
t
o
R1-9.5 units to the south. The R1-9.5 plan, because of the lack of the
c
o
m
m
o
n
w
a
l
l
and increase in the number of units, appears more dense visuall
y
w
i
t
h
l
e
s
s
consolidated open space. Due to the variable setbacks proposed, many
o
f
t
h
e
u
n
i
t
s
would be placed within 20 feet of the rear lot line and too close
t
o
t
h
e
h
o
m
e
s
i
n
the R1-9.5 area to the south without an appropriate transition
.
T
h
e
v
a
r
i
a
b
l
e
setbacks push units closer to Highway #101 which does not leave
e
n
o
u
g
h
r
o
o
m
f
o
r
buffering.
Architectural Variety
In all R1-9.5 areas, an architectural diversity plan is required to
c
r
e
a
t
e
v
a
r
i
e
t
y
in the street appearance. Since narrow lots limit unit types to
m
o
s
t
l
y
g
a
r
a
g
e
fronts, experience has shown it may not be possible to comply with the
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
policy of no two units alike, side by side, or opposite from each
o
t
h
e
r
.
T
h
i
s
i
s
the reason the Code was changed to increase the street frontage requ
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
h
e
R1-9.5 Zoning District from 55 to 70 feet. All units proposed in th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
garage fronts.
Utilities
Sewer and water service is available to this site and is located in B
a
r
r
i
n
g
t
o
n
W
a
y
.
This is an existing storm sewer system in Barrington Way as well.
Grading
Up to 24 feet of cut will be required on Lots 17-22 to create le
v
e
l
p
a
d
s
f
o
r
building development. No signficant trees are located on this site.
G
r
a
d
i
n
g
d
o
e
s
not impact the Jacques household next to Lot 22.
r1,
Hidden Glen IV Addition 3 April 22, 1988
Highway #101 and Townline Road
The current County plan for Townline Road and the State's plan for Highway #101 will
require additional right-of-way adjacent to this project. Outlots A & E are needed
for right-of-way purposes. Townline Road is envisioned ultimately as a four-lane
road and the sharp curve on Highway #101 will be changed to a more gradual curve.
Sidewalks and Trails
There is an existing 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the south side of
Barrington Road.
Landscaping
A landscape plan has been submitted which depicts approximately 350 caliper inches
of trees on-site.
Conclusions
The site plan, as proposed with variances, would be comparable to earlier R1-9.5
projects with narrow street frontages and mostly garage front units. Since narrow
lots limit unit types to mostly garage fronts experience has shown that it may not
be possible to comply with the architectural policy, the City changed the Code to
increase the street frontages from 55 to 70 feet. The R1-9.5 Zoning District has
been more successful with wider street frontages and more room between the units.
The Commission must decide if a substantiation has been provided to justify the
variances through the PUD, and if the granting of the variances would make this a
better project for the City than if no variances were granted at all.
The Planning Commission must also decide if the change in land use within the PhD is
acceptable. The R1-9.5 plan appears to be more dense visually with less
consolidated open space between the units and less buffering adjacent to Highway
#101 and the R1-9.5 area to the south, than the twinhome plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
1. If the Commission feels that R1-9.5 lots may be acceptable as a land use
change, then one option would be to return the development plans to the
proponent for revisions, including meeting the minimum requirements of the
R1-9.5 Zoning District, providing a buffer from Highway #101, and an
architectural diversity plan consistent with architectural policy for small
lots.
2. If the Planning Commission feels that the plan, as proposed, is inconsistent
with the approved PUD, that no substantiation has been provided to justify
the variances through the PhD District Review, and the project, as proposed,
does not provide a buffering to Highway #101 or a transition to the housing
project to the south, one option would be to recommend denial.
1.3`1;t
AREA LOCATION MAP
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
May 20, 1988
Hidden Glen IV Addition
South of Townline Road, west of Dell Road, east of Highway #101
Derrick Land Company
1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 68 acres.
2. Zoning District Amendment within an existing RM-6.5 Zoning
District for 40 twinhome units on 8.5 acres.
Background
This is a continued item from the
April 22, 1988, Planning Commission
meeting. At the end of that
meeting, the developer withdrew the
request for Rezoning from RM-6.5 to
R1-9.5 and the Preliminary Plat for
40 small, single family, lots. The
new request is for a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Concept Review and
a Zoning District Amendment within
an existing RM-6.5 Zoning District.
This is a review of an approved
twinhome site plan with different
units (floor plans and
architecture).
Site Plan
The site plan depicts the con-
struction of 40 twinhome units in an
arrangement that is generally
consistent with the attached
approved site plan. There are two
differences. One, there is a
different building layout for Lot 21
and 22 in which the units face each
other rather than facing the street.
Hidden Glen IV Addition 2 May 20, 1988
Two, because of the different architectural styles and floor plans, the units are
narrower and deeper, meaning that the setbacks to Highway #101 and the existing
single family homes to the south are 25 to 30 feet less than the approved plan.
Transition
As a transition to the single family homes and to Highway #101, the plans depict
planting of shade and coniferous trees. There are 400 total caliper inches in the
site plan. Assuming that the units average 2,000 gross square feet of building
area, the caliper inch requirement would be 250 inches. Since the units are closer
to Highway #101 and the single family homes on the approved plan, and the amount of
open space in between is less, the landscape plan should be modified to provide a
heavier vegetative buffer. To provide a more effective transition, the size of the
trees in the transition areas to Highway #101 and the single family homes should be
increased in size to a four-inch minimum for shade trees and a ten to twelve-foot
height for conifers. There should also be a transition to the existing single
family household next to Lot 22. The landscape plan should be revised to include 4-
inch shade trees and 10 to 12-foot conifers along the east side of Lot 22.
Architectural Diversity Plan
The architectural diversity policy is for no two units to be alike side by side,
opposite, or diagonally across from each other. The plan depicts unit types keyed
to specific lots in accordance with the policy with the exception of Lot 19 and Lot
4. The "AC" and the "AD" unit types are the same building elevations. The plans
should be revised to insert a different unit type on either of these lots and be
consistent with the architectural diversity policy.
The shingles, trim colors, exterior materials, windows, doors, garage doors, roof
pitches, and roof end treatments are proposed to be identical for unit types
attached to each other. Exterior colors for the unit types attached to each other
are to be identical or substantially similar in color.
A Homeowners' Association should be set up for maintenance of building exteriors and
landscaping. The association should include an Architectural Review Committee
responsible for reviewing building additions, decks, and color schemes.
Utilities
Sewer and water service is available to the site and is located in Barrington Way.
There is an existing storm sewer system in Barrington Way as well.
Grading
The grading plan is similar to the approved grading plan. Up to 24 feet of cut
would be required on Lot 17-22 to create level pad areas for building development.
No significant trees are located on this site. Grading does not impact the existing
single family home next to Lot 22.
Sidewalks and Trails
There is an existing five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the south side of
Barrington Way. There is an existing eight-foot wide bituminous trail and a five-
foot wide concrete sidewalk along Dell Road.
IA N
Hidden Glen IV Addition 3 May 20, 1988
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the PUD Concept Amendment on 68 acres
and the Zoning District Amendment within an existing RM-6.5 Zoning District on 8.5
acres subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated May 20, 1988, and
based on the following conditions:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Modify the landscape plan to provide for larger shade and coniferous
trees along Highway 4101, along the lot lines adjacent to the single
family homes to the south and on the east lot line of Lot 22. Plant
material sizes in these areas shall be a four-inch minimum for shade
trees and ten to twelve-foot minimum height for coniferous trees.
B. Modify the architectural diversity plan to provide for a different
unit types on Lots 19 and Lot 4, consistent with the architectural
diversity policy.
2. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
B. Submit Homeowners Association documents for review.
1,g5
,...RWEVITAY- 'VARIATIONS HIDDEN GLEN IV _ EDEN PRAIRIEJt11 HWE-19-I 115 re•.e.o,.6r 1 \ I i 5-1.11-2-1111 4 il ° - - Bar/Irani-6 Rifire—will be centered within the R.O.W. It may appear oft center due to the reproduction process. riAv • . • I . ' , • , • • CITY OF taiNric lunar. Approved Twinhome Plan Attachment A
Architectural Diversity Plan Revision
Hi/Attachment B
VAC 88-03
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-126
VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMEN
T
S
O
N
PART OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, AMERICAN FAMILY A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has a
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
a
n
d
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the east line of
L
o
t
1
,
B
l
o
c
k
1
,
A
M
E
R
I
C
A
N
F
A
M
I
L
Y
ADDITION distant 10.00 feet south of the n
o
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
s
a
i
d
L
o
t
1
,
Block 1; thence South 4 degrees 10 minu
t
e
s
0
8
s
e
c
o
n
d
s
W
e
s
t
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
east line of Lot 1, a distance of 35.00 f
e
e
t
;
t
h
e
n
c
e
N
o
r
t
h
8
5
d
e
g
r
e
e
s
4
9
minutes 52 seconds West, a distance of 77
1
.
3
9
f
e
e
t
;
t
h
e
n
c
e
n
o
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
e
r
l
y
along a tangentail curve concave to the
n
o
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
h
a
v
i
n
g
a
r
a
d
i
u
s
o
f
45.00 feet to its intersection with a li
n
e
1
0
.
0
0
f
e
e
t
s
o
u
t
h
e
r
l
y
o
f
a
n
d
parallel with the north line of said Lo
t
1
;
t
h
e
n
c
e
S
o
u
t
h
8
5
d
e
g
r
e
e
s
4
9
minutes 52 seconds East along said
p
a
r
a
l
l
e
l
l
i
n
e
t
o
t
h
e
p
o
i
n
t
o
f
beginning.
Which lies westerly of the west line of
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
1
7
1
.
2
8
f
e
e
t
o
f
L
o
t
3
,
Block 1, OPUS II 2ND ADDITION as shown
o
n
t
h
e
p
l
a
t
o
f
A
M
E
R
I
C
N
F
A
M
I
L
Y
ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
1
9
8
8
,
a
f
t
e
r
d
u
e
n
o
t
i
c
e
w
a
s
published and posted as required by law;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that th
e
s
a
i
d
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
i
s
n
o
t
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
a
n
d
has no interest to the public, therefore
,
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
v
a
c
a
t
e
d
.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Ede
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
a
s
f
o
l
l
o
w
s
:
1. Said drainage and utility easement as above described is
h
e
r
e
b
y
vacated.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
o
f
p
r
o
c
e
e
d
i
n
g
s
in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council
o
n
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
1
9
8
8
.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
800 Opus Center
Mailing Address 9900 lien Road last
PD Box 150 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 16111 936 4444
:1„
May 3, 1988
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2499
OPUS CORPORATION
2sez-c
oject Manager
P110 OPUS CORPORATION
17G-cco4 /0. esj _0 3 OESIGNk RS • 81111005 • OEVFLOPERS
To Whom It May Concern:
Enclosed is our application for an eas
e
m
e
n
t
v
a
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
F
a
m
i
l
y
Insurance, 6131 Blue Circle Drive,
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
.
W
e
h
a
v
e
d
i
s
c
o
v
e
r
e
d
that the new Phase 3 parking ramp stru
c
t
u
r
e
e
n
c
r
o
a
c
h
e
s
u
p
o
n
t
h
e
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
and utility easement in the area ind
i
c
a
t
e
d
i
n
y
e
l
l
o
w
o
n
t
h
e
a
t
t
a
c
h
e
d
plat.
The section of easement to be vaca
t
e
d
w
a
s
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
l
y
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
extension of the secondary roadway
s
y
s
t
e
m
.
However, the secondary roadway system will not extend t
o
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
a
n
d
n
o
r
t
h
a
s
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
l
y
contemplated, thus the easement to
b
e
v
a
c
a
t
e
d
i
s
n
o
t
n
e
e
d
e
d
.
The 10' wide utility easement along Yellow
C
i
r
c
l
e
D
r
i
v
e
i
s
t
o
r
e
m
a
i
n
.
To the best of our knowledge there are
n
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
easement to be vacated.
Please contact Mike Ryan, 936-4582
,
o
r
B
o
b
W
o
r
t
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
,
9
3
6
-
4
4
1
9
,
i
f
there are questions or additional inf
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
Sincerely,
MR:mel
cc: Bob Worthington w/enclosure
Fran Brewster w/enclosure
Opus and Alkliates in Minneapolis • Chicago • 15oeni,• Milwaukee • Tampa Pensacola
— L DRAINAGE 8 UTILITY EASEMENT -- - r NORTH LINE OF ------- - ,,...,.....: : .„..., , _rus,s.R.2825.49,52,,L: irl : :.../.../...:....:iii:" f.:-; _ t,.2.22 \ 47 . / - / 17 '-z R, 45.00 \ S.85. 4 9 ' 52"E. Y - _ \ 2 . c, ORMNAGE 8 unLirr EA SEMEN T -------- 7/ els cli7-i- \ vl r 0 rb L 0 7-' '-. \ ,f:-.? I._ c\. ::::. ic- F z S \ n \ n., m \ ,-7 \ ,i,.. 7 1 n s... \ • ,71.08 -----.. 70- ' *---- BLOcK 7, \ - IR C Z. E. 0,1c) /VD DRAINAGE 8 UTILITY r. _ \N " — \ 2,9,> 0 271.c 5.76. 58' ob 430.79 R.:86993 N 1 0-,
VAC 88-04
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-127
VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ON
PART OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, BAYPOINT TWO
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has a certain drainage and utility easement
described as follows:
The Southerly 523.00 feet of the drainage and utility easement
adjacent to the Lot line between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Baypoint
Two, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as measured along said line.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 21, 1988, after due notice was
published and posted as required by law;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said easement is not necessary and
has no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
1. Said drainage and utility easement as above described is hereby
vacated.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of proceedings
in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 21, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
BAYPOINT TWO
; Shaum are assumed.
mrh iron moriumeni end
hlaulesole Revird,or, No. 11891.
/9)\ cc-4
43018
43019
43020
; 3021
,3022
43023
43024
43025
43026
43027
43028
43029
43030
43031
43032
43033
43034
CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
CROW WING COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO
ICMA RETIREMENT CORP
MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN
PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN OF MN
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA
UNITED WAY
HIGHLAND SUPERSTORES
BUSINESS CREDIT LEASING INC
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENC
QUINLAN PUBLISHING CO
U S POST OFFICE
MN DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
AIS CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT CORP
43035 SUPPLEE'S 7 HI ENTERPRISES INC
43036 AL LARSON
43037 NANCY ADDUCCI
43038 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
43039 ROSS HARRIS
43040 HORNET FOUNDATION INC
43041 INTNATL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OF
43042 INTERNL SOCIETY OF FIRE SERV INST
43043 LINCOLN DEL
43044 DIANNE LUSIAN
43045 MILE
346 MINNEAPOLIS BUILDERS ASSOCIATION
-)047 JENNY PETERSON
43048 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT
43049 PICHA GREEN HOUSE
43050 CATHERINE PUTKA
43051 JULIE REED
43052 KATHY RUCKER
43053 DALE SCHMIDT
43054 STATE TREASURER
43055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
43056 ARDEN ZENKE
43057 SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS DIVISION
43058 BIFFS INC
43059 BROADWAY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
43060 CLUTS OBRIEN STROTHER ARCHITECTS
43061 MINNESOTA DAILY
43062 GUARANTEE MUTUAL LIFE CO
43063 MINNEGASCO
43064 MINNESOTA DAILY
43065 MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE
43066 NORTHWESTERN BELL
43067 U S WEST CELLULAR INC
43068 POSTAGE BY PHONE
43069 CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN TRANS CO
43070 MINNESOTA ORCHESTRA
-1 71 BEER WHOLESALERS INC
14730180
JUNE 21,1988
PAYROLL 5/27/88 891.00 PAYROLL 5/27/88 12817.17
CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 252.00 PAYROLL 5/27/88 49026.21
PAYROLL 5/27/88 4071.00 PAYROLL 5/27/88 1325.80
HEALTH PREMIUM FOR JUNE 88 12178.65 HEALTH PREMIUM FOR JUNE 88 19221.60
PAYROLL 5/27/88 24198.08 PAYROLL 5/27/88 211.50
CAMCORDER CASE-POLICE DEPT 49.00 JUNE 88 COPIER RENTAL-FIRE DEPT 182.75 LICENSE FEE-WATER PLANT EXPANSION 50.00 BOOK-FIRE DEPT 6.95
POSTAGE-POLICE DEPT 250.00 PERMIT TO TREAT ROUND LAKE AREA-PARKS DEPT 22.00
-BLADES & BOLTS FOR TRACTOR MOWER- 106.09 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
JUNE 88 RENT-LIQUOR STORE
4582.40 EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
200.00
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
30.50 LICENSE FEE-ASSESSING DEPT
75.00
REFUND-GUIDE PLAND DEPOSIT
50.00 SCHOOLS-SEWER DEPT
80.00
BOOKS-FIRE DEPT
335.00 BOOKS-FIRE DEPT
122.95
EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL
49.61 REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
19.00
CONFERENCE-ASSESSING DEPT
145.00
CONFERENCE-BUILDING DEPT
20.00 EXPENSES-STREET DEPT
10.00 EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
21.69
FLOWERS-ROUND LAKE PARK
60.00 EXPENSES-FINANCE DEPT
8.50
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
12.00 REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
13.50 EXPENSES-STREET DEPT
26.33 LICENSE-WATER DEPT
15.00 SCHOOL-ASSESSING DEPT
115.00 REFUND-ADULT MEMBERSHIP
136.00 LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT
72.21 WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE
39.50 CAR WASH POWDER-POLICE DEPT
118.76 SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER
45.00 EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER
103.22 JUNE 88 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM
2284.43 SERVICE
8.89 EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER
103.22 JUNE 88 DIABILITY INSURANCE PREMIUM
2617.93 SERVICE
3709.49 SERVICE
223.92 POSTAGE-POLICE DEPT
1000.00 LICENSE FEE-STORM SEWER CROSSING
150.00 POPS CONCERT/FEES PAID
374.40 BEER
5463.55
13 u2
JUNE 21,1988
43072 COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANY
43073 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
43074 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY
1 3075 MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
3076 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COMPANY
43077 ROYAL CROWN BEVERAGE COMPANY
43078 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
43079 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE
43080 EAGLE WINE CO
43081 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC
43082 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
43083 PAUSTIS & SONS CO
43084 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
43085 PRIOR WINE CO
43086 QUALITY WINE CO
43087 THE WINE COMPANY
43088 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
43089 DANA GIBBS
43090 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
43091 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
43092 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOCIATION
43093 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOCIATION
43094 PETTY CASH
43095 MN DEPT OF P/S
43096 PETTY CASH
43097 CITY-COUNTY CREDIT UNION
43098 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
43099 CROW WING COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
4 3100 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
101 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO
43102 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP
43103 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG
43104 NORWEST BANK OF HOPKINS
43105 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-P E R A
43106 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-P E R A
43107 UNITED WAY
43108 MN DEPT OF P/S
43109 MN DEPT OF P/S
43110 PREMIER RENT A CAR
43111 ALLIED BLACKTOP CO
43112 BARBAROSSA & SONS INC
43113 BROWN & CRIS INC
43114 NODLAND CONSTRUCTION CO
43115 NODLAND CONSTRUCTION CO
MIX
BEER
BEER
BEER
MIX
MIX
BEER
MIX
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
WINE
MAY 88 FUEL TAX
SERVICE-PACKET DELIVERY
MAY 88 SALES TAX
1ST HALF JUNE 88 ESTIMATED SALES TAX
SOFTBALL REGISTRATIONS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS
PLAYGROUND TRAINING/FEES PAID
PARK RENTAL-SUMMER PLAYGROUND PROGRAM
MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION
EXPENSES-CITY HALL
PAYROLL 6/10/88
PAYROLL 6/10/88
CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION
PAYROLL 6/10/88
PAYROLL 6/10/88
PAYROLL 6/10/88
UNION DUES FOR JUNE 88
PAYROLL 5/27/88 & 6/10/88
JULY 88 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM
PAYROLL 6/10/88
PAYROLL 6/10/88
MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION
MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION
CAR RENTAL-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
SERVICE-1988 BITUMINOUS SEAL COATING
SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDITION
SERVICE-BENNETT PLACE & BLOSSOM RD
SERVICE-WYNDHAM KNOLL
-SERVICE-HIDDEN GLEN 3RD ADDITION/WYNDHAM
CREST
SERVICE-PRAIRIE VIEW DRIVE & ST ANDREWS DR
SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDITION
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-POLICE DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
POLAROID CAMERA-POLICE FORFEITURE-DRUGS
CO BOND PAYMENT
1ST AID SUPPLIES-ROUND LAKE BEACH
1ST AID SUPPLIES-ROUND LAKE BEACH
ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORE
CAN LINERS-PARK MAINTENANCE
1009.85
6834.35
18167.60
26069.40
743.40
239.60
25110.20
106.38
488.33
7911.13
9744.95
82.44
12420.45
663.34
5024.26
289.50
120.60
105.00
17733.25
11275.00
3300.00
70.00
125.00
38.25
69.39
891.00
12980.18
252.00
48851.60
4021.00
1325.80
874.00
900.00
90.00
25146.56
211.50
25.75
90.25
246.00
144349.60
194982.75
15972.08
7890.92
4034.88
9041.63
11110.25
180.20
198.83
1495.00
29110.09
65.00
130.00
850.00
174.78
43116 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO INC
43117 SHAW LUNDQUIST ASSOC INC
43118 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER
43119 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC
43120 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO
43121 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK & TRUST
43122 AMERICAN RED CROSS
43123 AMERICAN RED CROSS
43124 AMERICAN TAPE ADVERTISING INC
-1 25 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY
66323332
/7-1 ,5-1
43132 BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES INC
43133 BASS PRO SHOPS
43134 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC
43135 BAUER BUILT INC
43136 BERGIN AUTO BODY
43137 TRACI BERGO
43138 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY
43139 BEST & FLANAGAN
43140 BIFFS INC
43141 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
43142 RICK BOLINSKE
43143 BRADY OFFICEWARE INC
43144 BRAUN END TESTING INC
43145 ED BRION
43146 BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC
BUSINESS RECORDS CORP MI
BUSINESS YELLOW PAGES
CABINETREE
DUANE J CABLE
CARLSON & CARLSON ASSOC
HILMER J CARLSON PH D
CARLSON REFRIGERATION CO
CEDAR HILLS GOLF COURSE
CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS
CHUCK'S BAGS UNLIMITED
CLIMATE MAKERS INC
( 147
•J148
43149
43150
43151
43152
43153
43154
43155
43156
43157
43158
43159 CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SER INC
43160 CHAPIN PUBLISHING COMPANY
43161 CHEMLAWN
43162 COMPUTER KNOW HOW
43163 COMPUTER PLACE
43164 CONCEPT MICROFILM INC
43165 CONCRETE RAISING INC
43166 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC
12406898
STREET SIGNS-STREET DEPT
2536.65 GRAVEL-STREET MAINTENANCE
1347.92 CEMENT-CULVERTS 196.25 ROOF REPAIR-SENIOR CENTER
3571.00 REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING
5.01 -SERVICE-DELL ROAD/EVENER WAY FEASIBILITY/
16183.11 -COLUMBINE RD FEASIBILITY/VALLEY VIEW RD-
-BITTERSWEET TO HOWARD/VALLEY VIEW RD-
-MITCHELL TO COUNTY RD 4/ANDERSON LAKES
PARKWAY - TH 169 TO MITCHELL ROAD
SERVICE-UPDATE PARK OPEN SPACE
5265.42 -TENTS/COOKWARE-AFTERNOON ADVENTURE-
909.17 COMMUNITY CENTER
-SIGNAL LIGHTS/FUSES/ALTERNATOR/STARTER/
135.84 POWER STEERING FLUID-EQUIPMENT MAINT
TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
96.90 PAINT RED STRIPE ON SUBURBAN-FIRE DEPT
355.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
75.00 SERVICE-CITY HALL 337.50 LEGAL SERVICE-HIDDEN GLEN SEWER
10.00 WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE
1499.60 APRIL 88 ANIMAL IMPOUND SERVICE
420.00 MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER
115.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
91.84 SERVICE-COLUMBINE RD/FIRE STATIONS #3 & 4
8209.15 SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
180.00
-JUNE 88 TRASH DISPOSAL-CITY HALL/WATER
550.98 -DEPT/POLICE & FIRE BUILDINGS/LIQUOR STORE/
COMMUNITY CENTER
GRAVEL-PARK MAINTENANCE/STREET MAINTENANCE
109.38 14 VOTE COUNTERS-ELECTIONS
71036.00 ADVERTISING-COMMUNITY CENTER
117.00 COUNTERTOP SHEET STOCK-SENIOR CENTER
600.00 FIRE CALLS 630.00 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE-HUMAN RESOURCES
2500.00 TRAINING/CONSULTATION-FIRE DEPT
25.00 -GLASS GLOBE/REPAIR REGRIGERATION UNIT-
61.10 LIQUOR STORE
SERVICE-SPRING SKILL DEVELOPMENT
456.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIR-SEWER DEPT
15.00 1ST AID BAGS-FIRE DEPT
1875.00 -AIR CONDITIONING & COMPRESSOR REPAIR-
347.76 COMMUNITY CENTER
-SEAL/BRAKE DRUM REPAIR/LINED SHOE BRAKE-
95.95 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/FIRE DEPT
LEGAL ADS-WATER DEPT
236.30 LAWN CARE-SENIOR CENTER
100.00 SCHOOLS-FIRE DEPT 30.00 -COMPUTER/HARD DRIVE/STATIC PAD/MEMORY
1658.82 -SURCHARGE/POWER SURGE PROTECTOR/PRINTER/
CABLE-POLICE FORFEITURE-DRUGS
PRINTING FORMS-ENGINEERING DEPT
843.12 MUDJACKING-DRAINAGE CONTROL
1087.50 -CONCRETE RAKE/FIBER EXPANSION/CEMENT CURE
152.96 STREET MAINTENANCE/DRAINAGE CONTROL
1.9,(A2. 19 j
JUNE 21,1988
43126 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC
43127 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC
43128 AVR INC
3129 AWR INC
t '3130 B & B INVESTMENT
43131 B R W INC
JUNE 21,1988
43167 CONTACT MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INC -RADIO REPAIR-P
O
L
I
C
E
D
E
P
T
/
F
I
R
E
D
E
P
T
/
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 43168 BARBARA COOK EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT I 1169 COPY EQUIPMENT INC METAL LOCATOR-SEWER DEPT 3170 STEVEN CRONBERG REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING 43171 CROWN MARKING INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 43172 CULLIGAN SERVICE 43173 CURTIS INDUSTRIES 2216339
SCREWS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 43174 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 43175 D B SERVICE & EQUIPMENT
-REPAIR PRESSURE WASHER-PUBLIC WORKS &
PARKS BLDG 43176 WARD F DAHLBERG MAY 88 EXPENSES 43177 TOM DAHLEN SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 43178 DALCO -CLEANING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER/PARK
MAINTENANCE 43179 PAUL DANIELSON TENNIS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 43180 DATASOURCE CONNECTING POINT
-PRINTER/SOFTWARE/COMPUTER ACCESSORIES-
POLICE FORFEITURE-DRUGS 43181 MITCHELL DEAN MILEAGE-LIQUOR STORE 43182 EUGENE DIETZ MAY 88 EXPENSES 43183 DON EVE & SONS SERVICE-DOZER WORK 43184 DUSTCOATING INC DUSTCOATING-DUST CONTROL 43185 EDEN PRAIRIE FIGURE SKATING CLUB COSTUMES-ICE S
H
O
W
-
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
C
E
N
T
E
R
43186 EDINA GOLF DOME GOLF MATS-ADULT GOLF LESSONS 43187 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS
MANHOLE RINGS-SEWER DEPT 43188 PATRICIA JEAN ENFIELD FIRE CALLS 43189 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC
MANHOLE RINGS/CATCH BASIN-SEWER DEPT 43190 FABRI-TOP INC COUNTERTOPS-HOMEWARD HILLS PARK BLDG 43191 FEIST-BLANCHARD CO -BELTS/SOLENOID SWITCHES/VOLT REGULATORS/
-JUNCTION BLOCK/FUSES/OIL FILTER CAPS/
-TRAILER CONVERTER/CARPET MATS/CARBURETOR/
WIRE SET/SOCKET-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 43192 FITNESS ASSOCIATES INC STRESS TESTS-POLICE DEPT 43193 FLEET MAINTENANCE INC -NUTS & BOLTS/BATTERY/REPLACE BATTERY/
-ADJUST STARTER & RELAY CONNECTIONS-FIRE
DEPT 43194 FOREMAN & CLARK UNIFORMS
UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT 43195 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR
S
T
O
R
E
43196 JOHN FRANE MAY 88 EXPENSES 43197 G & K SERVICES COVERALLS/TOWELS-WATER DEPT/PARK MAINT 43198 G A B BUSINESS KRVICES INC
LIABILITY INSURANCE 43199 JEANETTE GILLIS KIDS KORNER INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 42200 DAVID GILMORE FIRE CALLS 43201 JOE GLEASON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 43202 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
1988 MUNICIPAL CLIPPING SERVICE 43203 GOPHER STAGE LIGHTING INC
-STAGE LIGHTING/EQUIPMENT RENTAL-ICE SHOW-
COMMUNITY CENTER 43204 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE
CONFERENCE-ADMINISTRATION 43205 GROSS OFFICE SUPPLY OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 43206 GRANT MERRITT & ASSOCIATES LTD
MAY 88 LEGAL SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL 43207 ALAN GRAY MAY 88 EXPENSES-ENGINEERING DEPT 43208 MICHAEL GROH MARCH & APRIL 88 CONSULTING SERVICE 43209 HAGEN SYSTEMS REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING 43210 C F HAGLIN & SONS CO SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER REPAIR '"?11 FIANCE COMPANIES WEEDEATER HEAD-PARK MAINTENANCE
5148043
341.44
8.00
195.00
59.98
8.25
79.90
10.01
3333.11
230.50
80.00
240.00
1811.91
336.00
2834.00
11.25
253.75
350.00
2100.00
866.53
200.00
339.86
99.00
815.00
135.00
470.30
50.00
270.96
445.50
598.48
200.00
361.84
1401.81
383.00
645.00
210.00
100.00
888.00
128.00
110.72
3661.69
252.00
300.00
584.26
25622.30
58.08
JUNE 21,1988
43212 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC -SERVICE-BLUFFS EAST 4TH ADDITION/PIONEER 13939.84 -TRAIL & COUNTY RD 18/FRANLO ROAD/HAMILTON
ROAD/SW CITY AREA STUDY 11'3213 HARMON GLASS SHADED WINDSHIELDS-POLICE DEPT 334.56 3214 HENNEPIN CTY CHIEFS OF POLICE SCHOOLS-POLICE DEPT 290.00 43215 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER ACETYLENE/OXYGEN-PARK MAINTENANCE 51.50 43216 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT ANTENNAS/SEAT COVERS-POLICE DEPT 39.42 43217 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER POSTAGE-VOTER REGISTRATION VERIFICATION 61.95 43218 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER FILING FEE-PLANNING DEPT 230.00 43219 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER APRIL 88 BOARD OF PRISONERS 2022.00 43220 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL INSTITUTE SCHOOLS-FIRE DEPT 840.00 43221 D C HEY INC -MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-PUBLIC WORKS & 76.96
PARKS BUILDING
43222 ARTHUR T HIMMELMAN SERVICE-HUMAN SERVICES 150.00 43223 TERRY HITCHCOCK REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING 54.32 43224 HOFF & ALLEN LEGAL SERVICE 128.80 43225 HOFFERS INC COVER/BRUSH/FIELD MARKING-PARK MAINTENANCE 96.75 43226 HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC REFRIGERATION PUMP REPAIR-ICE ARENA 252.00 43227 HONEYWELL PROTECTION SERVICES -3RD QUARTER 88 SECURITY SYSTEM-SENIOR 75.00
CENTER
43228 IBM CORPORATION JUNE 88 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL 424.32 43229 ICMA DUES-ADMINISTRATION 273.25 43230 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #272 -GYM RENTAL-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS/COMMUNITY 4194.50
BAND/ROOM RENTAL-KIDS KORNER
43231 INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING SUPPLY INC LIGHT BULBS-WATER DEPT 197.72 43232 GARY ISAACS SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 270.00 43233 MICHAEL W JACQUES MILEAGE-LIQUOR STORE 10.00 43234 JERRY'S SUPERVALU EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 75.90 43235 CARL JULLIE EXPENSES-ADMINISTRATION 228.29 236 JUSTUS LUMBER CO -TREATED TIMBERS/WOOD PROTECTOR/FORMICA/ 635.92 -FORMICA ADHESIVE-WATER DEPT/PARK MAINT/
COMMUNITY CENTER
43237 KATE KARNAS MILEAGE-PLANNING DEPT 11.00 43238 KAYE CORPORATION SPARK PLUGS-PARK MAINTENANCE 6.45 43239 TOM KEEFE SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 180.00 43240 BRADLEY J KNUTSON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 165.00 43241 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER TUBES-PARK MAINTENANCE 6.58 43242 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER -VINYL RUNNER/SIGNS/BATTERIES/BULBS/PIPE/ 174.38 -CHISELS/PAINT BRUSHES/NUMBERS/RUST
REMOVER/FOIL/RUG CLEANERS-WATER DEPT
43243 D J KRANZ REFUND-OVERPAYMENT BUILDING PERMIT 5.47 43244 LANE INSURANCE INC -BOILER & MACHINERY INSURANCE-COMMUNITY 6629.00 CENTER
43245 SUE LANE MILEAGE-ELECTIONS 12.50 43246 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD FEBRUARY 88 LEGAL SERVICE/FEBRUARY 88 16980.06 43247 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 166888.00 43248 LEEF BROS INC COVERALLS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 67.00 43249 LORNA J LISELL EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT 8.00 43250 LOUISVILLE LANDFILL INC -WASTE DISPOSAL-STREET MAINTENANCE/PARK 156.00 MAINTENANCE
43251 LYMAN LUMBER CO -SPIKES/SIDING/MASONITE/NAILS/TIMBERS- 503.79 -SIGNS/PARK MAINTENANCE/87 JULY STORM
DAMAGE
43252 MAACO AUTO PAINTING PAINT VEHICLE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 407.50 '''53 MARKHURD CORPORATION PRINTING-ENGINEERING DEPT 154.00
21730773
JUNE 21,1988
STRESS TESTS-POLICE DEPT 325.00 -JULY 88 COMPUTER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-
1295.00 POLICE DEPT
REPAIRED SHOWER VALVES-COMMUNITY CENTER
76.25 CEMENT-STREET MAINTENANCE 75.00 -BOLTS/NUTS/WASHERS/BATTERIES/SPLASH 22.30 -GUARDS-PARK MAINTENANCE/HISTORICAL &
CULTURAL COMMISSION/COMMUNITY CENTER
-3RD QUARTER 88 ALARM SYSTEM-PUBLIC WORKS
78.00 & PARK BUILDING
MAY 88 SAC CHARGES 109241.55 PAGER CASES-FIRE DEPT 225.00 BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE 2078.34 EXPENSES/KIDS KORNER INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
401.74 PRINTING-ENGINEER DEPT/PLANNING DEPT 667.32 -PASSENGER ASSISTANCE CLASS-SENIOR 360.00 PROGRAMS
-JUNE 88 PAGER SERVICE-POLICE DEPT/FIRE
127.77 DEPT
TITLE TAPES/NUMBERS/EMBLEMS-FIRE DEPT 175.40 EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER 82.80 SERVICE 150.00 ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES 558.00 CITY AUCTION WANT ADS 101.01 EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER 311.75 TREES-FORESTRY DEPT 308.00 BOTTLE JACKETS-LIQUOR STORE 285.00 RADIO REPAIR-FIRE DEPT 256.50 -SEALS/CASTOR WHEEL/ROLLERS/PULLEY- 243.98 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/PARK MAINTENANCE
SAND-PARK MAINTENANCE 147.24 EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 51.85 BOND PAYMENT 15651.60 BATTERY CHARGER/BATTERIES-POLICE DEPT
190.12 EXPENSES-SPECIAL EVENTS 44.92 TRAINING SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 15.95 BOND PAYMENT 213130.89 PRINTING SPECIFICATIONS-ENGINEERING DEPT
1119.60 CUTTERBAR-PARK MAINTENANCE 92.38 GROUND COVER SEED-87 JULY STORM DAMAGE
389.16 CEMENT-SEWER DEPT 13.50 LUBRICANTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 911.24 COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY-HUMAN RESOURCES
50.56 MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 20.50 EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT 8.00 -HEAT PUMP REPAIR/COMPRESSOR/FAN MOTOR/
787.47 REFRIGERANT/SPRAY PUMP REPAIR-POLICE BLDG
SCHOOL-WATER DEPT 15.00 PRINTPOWDER/SILICONE OIL-COMMUNITY CENTER
640.00 -3RD QUARTER 88 POSTAGE METER RENTAL-CITY
1347.24 -HALL/MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-COMMUNITY
CENTER
URINAL KITS-POLICE BUILDING 25.42 BASKETBALL PLAQUES-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS
54.00 -REPLACE HAND DRYER FAN MOTOR-COMMUNITY
395.40 CENTER/RELOCATE RECEPTACLE-SENIOR CENTER
43254 MARTIN MCALLISTER
43255 MASYS CORPORATION • 1256 MCQUIRE & SONS PLBG & HTG
t 3257 MC FARLANES INC
43258 MERLINS HARDWARE HANK
43259 METRO ALARM INC
43260 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMIS
43261 MID CENTRAL INC
43262 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
43263 MARION MILLER
43264 MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT
43265 MINNEAPOLIS TECHNICAL INSTITUTE
43266 MINN COMM
43267 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
43268 THE MINNESOTA DAILY
43269 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
43270 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC
43271 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC
43272 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC
43273 MINNESOTA VALLEY WHOLESALE INC
43274 SHARON MORGAN'S NOVELTIES
43275 MOTOROLA INC
41276 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
,„1277 WM MUELLER & SONS INC
43278 MY CHEESE SHOP
43279 NATIONAL CITY BANK
43280 NESS ELECTRONICS INC
43281 BETH NILSSON
43282 NIGHTINGALE CONANT CORPORATION
43283 NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA N A
43284 NORWEST PRINTING
43285 NORTH STAR TURF INC
43286 NORTHRUP KING CO
43287 OCHS BRICK & TILE CO
43288 PENNSYLVANIA OIL CO
43289 PERSONNEL DECISIONS INC
43290 CONNIE L PETERS
43291 RICHARD R PETERSBURG
43292 T A PERRY ASSOCIATES INC
43293 STEVEN SCOTT PITKANEN
43294 PITNEY BOWES
43295 PITNEY BOWES
43296 POKORNY COMPANY
43297 POMMER COMPANY INC
'-'98 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC
35254775
43299 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
43300 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
43301 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
43302 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
43303 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN
43304 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING
43305 PRENTICE HALL
43306 PRIOR LAKE AGGREGATE INC
43307 PROTOOL
43308 JOSHUA PUTKA
43309 RESCUE ONE
43310 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC
43311 RIVIERA FINANCIAL SERVICES
A1312 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CO
43313 ROAD RESCUE INC
43314 ROLLINS OIL CO
43315 ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS
43316 RUBY SWEIGERT QUAM
43317 QUALITY INDUSTRIES INC
43318 KEVIN ROSS
43319 S & S ARTS & CRAFTS
43320 ST CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY
43321 SAINT PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO
43322 SAINT PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO
43323 JOHN SAMS
43324 SAVOIE SUPPLY CO INC
43325 SCHMIDT READY MIX INC
43326 SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM INC
43327 SHAKOPEE FORD INC
-NUTS/PLASTIC DIP/TAPES/WASHERS/SCREWS/
CHAIN-PARK MAINTENANCE/FITNESS CLASSES
-PAINT/BRUSHES/HOSE/SCREWS/TROWELS/DRILL/
-LAUNDRY BASKETS/PAIL/THERMOMETER/ROPE/
-CLAMPS/NOOKS/CORD/HANDLE/BULBS/FOOD SAVER/ -KEYS/KEY RINGS/STAPLES/ELECTRICAL TAPE/
-SCREWDRIVER KIT/RUBBER GLOVES-COMMUNITY
CENTER
-STAND/MALLOT/RIVETS/TOOLBOX/HAMMER/NAILS/
-MEASURING TAPE/SCREWDRIVER/WIRING TOOL/
-WRENCHES/HINGE/BOLTS/COUPLING/SHOVEL/SAW/
TAPE RULE-WATER DEPT
-TAPE RULE/BATTERIES/CONDUIT/DUFFEL BAG/
LOCKS-SEWER DEPT
-BLOWER/OIL/HUB/SPOOL/SPRAY/TUBE-POLICE
DEPT/PARK MAINTENANCE/COMMUNITY CENTER
-PRINTING-HOMESTEAD APPLICATIONS-$89.75-
-COMMUNITY PROFILE-$545.00-PLANNING DEPT/
SIGNS-$356.95-STREET DEPT
BOOK-FORESTRY DEPT
SAND-STREET MAINTENANCE/PARK MAINTENANCE
SUPPLIES-STREET MAINTENANCE
SERVICE-WATER DEPT
SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT
-SERVICE-ROWLAND ROAD FEASIBILITY/
-COMPREHENSIVE SEWER POLICY PLAN/HIDDEN
-GLEN 3RD ADDITION/WYNDHAM CREST/GOLDEN
-TRIANGLE DRIVE/MITCHELL RD FEASIBILITY/
MITCHELL & RESEARCH STREET IMPROVEMENT
SCREWS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-CRANE DIGGER REPAIR/BUSHINGS/WIPER/DECALS
-0-RINGS/BRAKE LININGS-41286.53-FORESTRY
-DEPT/EYELETS/CAPE/STRAINER/NOZZLE/GASKET-
-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/BED COVER-$650.00-
FIRE DEPT
1ST AID SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT
FUEL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
1984 FRANCHISE FEES
REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING
TOT SEAT-PARK MAINTENANCE
GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
SUPPLIES-AFTERNOON ADVENTURE
SCHOOLS-FIRE DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
-OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/CARE CENTER/
COMMUNITY CENTER
EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT
TOILET TISSUE-PARK MAINTENANCE
BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE
-SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER LITIGATION/FIRE
STATIONS #3 & 4
-SEAL ASSEMBLY/BEARINGS/SWITCH/SHIFT
-ASSEMBLY/HEADLIGHT SWITCHES-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
74.00
531.69
234.41
60.59
154.60
991.70
34.76
205.67
7.90
86.00
100.00
31998.34
47.50
2083.11
137.70
7588.00
11450.66
27.22
59.00
276.00
333.11
222.00
2.00
318.00
61.75
305.00
695.31
7527.62
174.97
6578861
JUNE 21,1988
43328 W GORDON SMITH CO
11 '3329 SOUTHWEST AUTO SUPPLY INC
43330 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING
43331 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
43332 STATE OF MINNESOTA
43333 STAR TRIBUNE
43334 STATE TREASURER
43335 SUPPLEE ENTERPRISES INC
43336 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
43337 JOSEPH E SUTCLIFFE
43338 NEIL SUTLIFF
43339 SUK IL YUN
43340 TJ'S OF EDEN PRAIRIE
43341 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
43342 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE INC
43343 ALVIN VAN HORN
43344 VIKING LABORATORIES INC
43345 KEITH WALL
43346 WATER SPECIALTY COMPANY
43347 PAUL WELIN
43348 SANDY WERTS
349 WESTERN LANDSCAPING
.,350 WILSON TANNER GRAPHICS
43351 ZACHMAN INC
43352 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
43353 EARL ZENT
42774 VOID OUT CHECK
42783 VOID OUT CHECK
42798 VOID OUT CHECK
42905 VOID OUT CHECK
42965 VOID OUT CHECK
43061 VOID OUT CHECK
43122 VOID OUT CHECK
1343632
-01L/FUEL ADDITIVE/LAMP/ROTOR/CAP/CONTROL
-UNIT/FUEL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/PARK
MAINTENANCE/WATER DEPT/POLICE DEPT
-HEATER CORE/CARBURETOR/SWITCH/PAINT/LIGHT
-SWITCH/BEARINGS/FUEL PUMP/MOTOR/IGNITION/
-BRAKES/BRAKE PADS/FILTERS/SCREEN/FLOOR
-MATS/BRAKE PARTS/ADHESIVE/VALVES/SEALS/
-FUEL PUMP/WATER PUMP/TEMPERATURE CONTROL/
HOSE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/WATER DEPT
CITY AUCTION WANT ADS
ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORE
-1988-1989 RETAIL FOOD HANDLER LICENSE-
LIQUOR STORES
CITY AUCTION WANT ADS
MAY 88 BLDG SURCHARGE
FURNACE FILTERS-LIQUOR STORE
HUB ASSEMBLY-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
EXERCISE INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
OXYGEN/ACETYLENE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
GAS CYLINDERS-COMMUNITY CENTER
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
GAS CYLINDER/POOL TESTER-POOL MAINTENANCE
EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
CEMENT/BONDING AGENT-POOL OPERATION
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
EXPENSES-SENIOR CENTER
REFUND-UTILITY BILLING
PRINTING-EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER
REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING
-1ST AID SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/COMMUNITY
CENTER
EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT
191.79
2132.50
75.60
632.50
80.00
364.33
8277.65
3.92
78.75
288.00
252.00
752.00
129.05
18.60
28.43
45.00
35.79
24.65
157.30
168.00
103.83
196.78
140.00
39.44
145.95
8.00
99.50-
118.78-
337.50-
137.34-
72.20-
103.22-
65.00-
$1635164.94
DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS
i '7 GENERAL
CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT
15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M
17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE
21 POLICE FORFEITURE
31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP
33 UTILITY BOND FUND
39 86 FIRE STATION CONST
44 UTILITY DEBT FUND
51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD
52 IMPROVEMENT DEBT FUND
73 WATER FUND
77 SEWER FUND
81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND
$1635164.94
662103.51
71218.75
94917.03
61456.70
5987.82
36684.90
206483.00
3706.44
206048.71
106334.40
51843.87
5461.81
110967.34
11950.66
It MEMO
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
RE:
City Council
Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
June 16, 1988
REVIEW OF BUS STORAGE FOR WOODDALE CHURCH
The original developer's agreement, approved by the City Council in 1981, required
that the church build a bus barn to accommodate between two to three buses. The
purpose of the bus barn was to store the vehicles out of sight from the adjacent
residences, and also since City Code does not permit outdoor storage of buses.
The Staff has visited the site to evaluate the site lines into the bus parking area.
This parking area is not only visible from the Molde single family residence
southwest of the site, but also would be visible from the adjacent single family
home immediately north of the parking area. The other houses on Golden Ridge Drive,
due to distance, topography, and vegetation, would not have a view of the parking
area. The parking area becomes more visible during the fall and winter months for
the household north of the parking area since the deciduous oak trees lose their
leaves. Use of landscaping for screening of buses will not be as effective as
storing the buses within a garage, since the two households affected are sitting at
a higher elevation.
A second option proposed by the Wooddale Church is to move the buses to an area
adjacent the junk yard or close to the building by the gymnasium with buses in the
future to be within the enclosed parking deck. No site line information has been
provided to properly evaluate these locations. Storing the buses within the
enclosed parking deck would be an acceptable long-term solution, however, the
churches phasing plan indicates that the decks would not be constructed until the
year 1998.
To store the buses on the property requires that the City Council amend the original
developer's agreement, deleting the requirement for the bus garage. Wooddale Church
must also apply for, and receive, a variance from the Board of Appeals for outdoor
storage on the property.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
THRU:
Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM:
Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources 14(f.
n'
DATE: June 15, 1988
SUBJECT: Mitchell Lake Scenic Easement
The Council has received a request from Earl Ingram to allow him to main
t
a
i
n
a
lawn area, sand beach and dock at his residence at 17064 Weston Bay.
The City required the developer to file a scenic easement 75' wide alo
n
g
t
h
e
shoreline of Mitchell Lake within the Weston Bay Subdivision. This s
c
e
n
i
c
easement does not allow removal of any live natural vegetation, nor d
o
e
s
i
t
allow development of any beaches or installation of any docks. The pur
p
o
s
e
o
f
this scenic easement was to conform to the scenic easement that was in
p
l
a
c
e
with the Timber Lakes Subdivision along the majority of the east s
i
d
e
o
f
Mitchell Lake.
The scenic easement within the Timber Lakes Subdivision is wit
h
t
h
e
Homeowner's Association, whereas the scenic easement with the Westo
n
B
a
y
Subdivision is with the City of Eden Prairie. Earlier this year the T
i
m
b
e
r
Lakes Homeowner's Association became aware of several violations
o
f
t
h
e
i
r
scenic easement. When the Homeowner's Association requested the
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
owner to restore the property, the property owner indicated that h
e
w
o
u
l
d
pursue the matter in court. The Homeowner's Association decided n
o
t
t
o
enforce the scenic easement. Since that time, there have been se
v
e
r
a
l
additional docks installed and some additional clearing within the
s
c
e
n
i
c
easement in the Timber Lakes Subdivision.
Much of the tree removal was initiated when the lake began reced
i
n
g
a
n
d
property owners began removing dead trees along the shoreline. Once t
h
e
t
r
e
e
s
were cut down, in many cases, heavy equipment was brought in to remove
s
t
u
m
p
s
.
Several individuals then had sand hauled in to create a beach where
t
h
e
d
e
a
d
trees had previously been.
Mr. Ingram also had heavy equipment brought in to remove the stumps
a
n
d
t
o
grade a boat access and lawn. Mr. Ingram's lot is a relatively narrow
l
o
t
a
n
d
the 75 wide scenic easement came within a few feet of the back of his
h
o
m
e
.
At this point, staff believes the City Council should reassess the des
i
r
e
f
o
r
a scenic easement around the entire lakeshore. The north shore ha
s
b
e
e
n
developed for many years with large lots that have full use of the la
k
e
s
h
o
r
e
and unless the Timber Lakes Homeowner's Association changes their mi
n
d
a
n
d
decides to pursue the enforcement of the scenic easement, it may n
o
t
m
a
k
e
sense to continue to require enforcement of the scenic easement within
W
e
s
t
o
n
Bay.
It seems obvious that when indi
v
i
d
u
a
l
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
s
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
a
n
e
x
p
e
n
s
i
v
e
lot on a lake, they will continu
e
t
o
p
u
s
h
t
o
h
a
v
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
h
e
l
a
k
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
the use of docks and to maintain
m
a
n
i
c
u
r
e
d
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
t
o
t
h
e
l
a
k
e
s
h
o
r
e
.
S
c
e
n
i
c
easements should work satisfact
o
r
i
l
y
w
h
e
n
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
r
e
a
b
u
t
t
i
n
g
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
creek valleys when the incentiv
e
i
s
t
o
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
t
h
e
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
attracted the property owner to t
h
e
a
r
e
a
,
b
u
t
t
h
e
y
a
r
e
u
n
l
i
k
e
l
y
t
o
w
o
r
k
a
l
o
n
g
lakeshores where property owners
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
a
n
t
l
y
w
a
n
t
t
o
g
a
i
n
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
h
e
natural feature that attracted th
e
m
t
o
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
.
Staff would recommend that in t
h
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
i
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
w
i
s
h
e
s
t
o
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
lakeshore in its natural conditio
n
,
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
n
e
g
o
t
i
a
t
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
a
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
i
f
a strip of land along the lakeshor
e
f
o
r
C
i
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
,
r
a
t
h
e
r
t
h
a
n
r
e
l
y
i
n
g
o
n
scenic easements; or strictly ad
h
e
r
e
t
o
t
h
e
S
h
o
r
e
l
a
n
d
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
regarding setbacks, lot widths, e
t
c
.
BL:mdd
I316
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
City Manager Carl J. Jullie
Staff Reorganization - Fire Department, Inspections
Department, Building Maintenance, Safety
June 15, 1988
As the Council is aware, the 1988 City budget provides for the position of
a full-time Fire Chief at mid-year. Over the past several weeks, after
additional input from Fire Chief Ron Johnson, Director of Inspections,
Kevin Schmieg, and Director of Human Resources, Natalie Swaggert, I have
been reviewing the possibilities for some staff reorganization which would
allow the continuation of a volunteer Fire Chief plus address other needs
relating to compliance with safety issues and building maintenance.
Ron Johnson has advised that it would be possible to retain the Volunteer
Chief position if we could move the Fire Marshal and Fire Inspection
function into another City Department, such as the Building Inspections
Department. This is what is done in Bloomington and Hopkins and it works
well in those cities. In our case, an important benefit would be improved
communication and coordination amongst staff when we are reviewing building
plans. The Fire Marshal and Fire Inspector are presently housed at the
Police Station.
Another need we have is to develop a safety program to address: OSHA
compliance for our City buildings, and City employee safety training,
procedures, and equipment needs. Our plan-check engineer, with assistance
of the Fire Marshal , can be assigned this responsibility.
An additional need is to improve the custodial work at City Hall and to
better coordinate the custodial work at the Police and Fire stations.
Presently, custodial work at City Hall is done through a maintenance
contract with a private company. I have received numerous complaints from
employees about the level of service and also concerns about security. We
have two full-time and one part-time position based at the Police
Department to take care of the Police building and three (soon to be four)
fire stations. Beginning in 1989 I propose to incorporate a "facility
maintenance division" within the inspection department which would work
under Kevin Schmieg's direction. In order to handle the increased
workload, the one part-time custodial position would be expanded from 30 to
40 hours/week. Additional part-time hours would also probably be
necessary, however we have not yet determined an estimate. This would be
part of our budget request for 1989.
Attached is an organizational chart for the restructured Department of
Inspections, Safety Rd Facilities. To accomplish this change, I am
recommending Council concurrence with the following:
1. Retain the present volunteer status of the Fire Chief position,
but modify the responsibilities of this position making them
manageable at a volunteer level.
[391
-2-
2. Transfer the existing positions of Fire Marshal and Fire
Inspector to the Inspections Department. Also, transfer the
funding allocated in the 1988 City budget for the new fire
inspector (4th Quarter) and clerical position (mid-year)
from the Fire Department to the Inspections Department.
3. Transfer the maintenance staff from the Police Department to
the Inspections Department and expand their responsibilities
to include maintenance of City Hall.
4. Promote Kevin Schmieg from "Director of Inspections" to
"Director of Inspections, Safety and Facilities". The
promotion recognizes the expansion of job responsibilities
and repositions the job from pay grade 9 to pay grade 10 on
the comparable worth hierarchy.
CJJ:jdp
l ?9Z
DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTIONS, SAFETY AND FACILITIES DIRECTOR :Safety Manage': , Facilities :— Manager —T Records I Supervisor U TI w.c.-7— Fire inspection Plan Review Facaity Maintenance Building inspection Administrative Support FACILITY SAFETY PROGRAM .OSHA Compliancem •Salety Eergency Plans •Slitety Committee •Safety Procedures •N•ed For Safety Equip. W.D —Work throchon
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY MANAGER CARL J. JULLIE C.
CITY MANAGER PERFORMANCE REVIEW
JUNE 15, 1988
Last December Councilmember Harris presented to the C
o
u
n
c
i
l
t
h
e
attached memo from Natalie Swaggert regarding a
m
e
t
h
o
d
o
f
measuring the City Manager's effectiveness. I bel
i
e
v
e
t
h
i
s
survey will be helpful to me as manager, to my staff,
a
s
w
e
l
l
a
s
to Councilmembers. Initially I would like to impl
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
survey at my immediate staff level. This would all
o
w
m
e
t
h
e
balance of the performance year to address management
i
s
s
u
e
s
a
t
that level. In January, I would recommend that we s
u
r
v
e
y
t
h
e
climate of the organization in general.
Attached for your review are the proposed survey quest
i
o
n
n
a
i
r
e
s
for both the employees and the Department Heads.
Po)
TO: JEAN HARRIS
COUNCIL MEMBER
FROM: NATALIE SWAGGERT
DIRECTOR HUMAN RESOURCES/SERVICES
DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1987
SUBJECT: METHOD FOR MEASURING A MANAGER'S EFFECTIVENESS
One way to measure the effectiveness of a Manager is to
monitor the level of satisfaction/dissatisfaction of employees on
a spectrum of issues within the organization. Typically this is
done through an annual climate/attitude survey. The survey would
be administered once a year and would be based on a core set of
questions so that responses and attitude changes could be
measured from one year to the next. Typically three to five
topical questions would be included that are developed to get at
current issues of interest. The results of the survey would
serve three purposes:
1. To measure the current level of satisfaction/dissatis-
faction within the organization.
2. To set goals for the City Manager and his staff to work
towards throughout the upcoming year.
3. Demonstrate a committment on the part of city management
to actively listen to its employees and raspond to their
concerns.
Attached is a sample list of questions that could be used.
If a decision is made to do an annual climate survey, several
excellent surveys are available through the private sector which
could serve as a base for developing an appropriate set of
questions for our organization.
Rev. 6/15/88
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
071701-1TEAD-SURVEr
QUESTION RESPONSE SCALE
1. I have a clear understanding of the
role of my department and how it
relates to the city's ultimate
direction.
2. There is a consistant framework
of policies and procedures with-
in which my department can carry
out its work.
Dissatisfied
1 2 3
1 2 3
Very
Satisfied
4 5
4 5
3. I feel the office of the City
Manager effectively channels infor-
mation and provides needed insight
to the Council's posture on issues
affecting my department. 1
4. I am treated as an integral part
of the management team and my in-
put is valid in the decision making
process. 1
2 3
4 5
2 3 4 5
5. My work is challenging.
6. The City Manager is aware of my
department's accomplishments and
provides appropriate recognition
to my staff.
7. I receive recognition for my work
and contributions.
8. The City Manager provides me with
the support and guidance I need to
to accomplish my goals and objec-
tives.
1 2 3
4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3
4 5
1 2 3
4 5
9. I am free to express my ideas with-
out fear of retribution. 1 2 3 4 5
10. I am provided with opportunities
to develop professionally.
1 2 3
4 5
11. Other comments:
Rev. 6/15/88
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
EMPLOYEE SURVEY
QUESTION RESPONSE SCALE
Very Very
Dissatisfied
Satisfied
1. I understand the goals and object-
ives of my department. 1
2. I receive timely communication on
information I believe is important. 1
3. I am treated in a fair manner and
policies are applied equally to all
employees throughout the organiza-
tion. 1
4. I am treated professionally and my
work is valued. 1
2 3 4 5
2 3 4 5
2 3 4 5
2 3 4 5
5. My work is meaningful. 1 2 3 4 5
6. I receive recognition for my work
and contributions. 1 2 3 4 5
7. I am free to express my ideas with-
out fear of retribution. 1
2 3 4 5
8. I think management is responsive to
problems when they arise. 1
2 3 4 5
9. I am given adequate training and
instructions to carryout my work
assignment.
10. I am provided with opportunities
to develop professionally.
11. Other comments:
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5