The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council - 04/05/1988AGENDA JOINT CITY COUNCIL/HUMAN RIGHTS & SERVICES COMMISSION HUMAN RIGHTS & SERVICES COMMISSION MEMBERS: CITY STAFF 6:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Jean Harris and Patricia Pidcock Gail Leipold, Elizabeth Kelly, William Jackson, Peter Iversen, Kent Barker, Melanie Lubbers Voris, Virginia Gartner, Margaret (Peg) Johnson, and Ellie Norberg City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, Director of Human Resources & Services Natalie Swaggert, and Recording Secretary Sue Anderson TUESDAY, APRIL 5, 1988 COUNCIL MEMBERS: ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA DISCUSSION OF HUMAN SERVICES MODEL OTHER BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT Page 502 AGENDA TUESDAY, APRIL 5, 1988 COUNCIL MEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7600 Executive Drive Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia Pidcock City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Community Services Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Sue Anderson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Page 503 Page 513 City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,April 5, 1988 II. MINUTES A. Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, February 16 1988 B. Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March li 1988 III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List B. Final Plat Approval for Bergman Addition (located west of Rosemary Road and south of Holly Road) Resolution No. 88-52 C. Final Plat Approval for Jenkins Addition (located north of Research Road and east of Mitchell Road) Resolution No. 88-19 D. Final Plat Approval for Starrwood Addition (located north of Research Road and east of Mitchell Road) Resolution No. 88-53 E. Final Plat Approval for Bell Oaks First Addition (Creekview) Tia-ited south of Purgatory Creek, north of Riverview Road and east of County Road 18) Resolution No. 88-54 F. Final Plat Approval for Windsonq II 2nd Addition (located east of Anderson Lakes Parkway and north of Windsong Drive) • Resolution No. 88-55 Page 526 Page 514 Page 515 Page 517 Page 520 Page 523 G. Receive Feasibility Study for Street, Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Page 528 Improvements on Mitchell Road between Carmody Lane and County Road No. 1 and Research Road between Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway and set Public Hearing, I.C. 52-5r -(Resolution No. 88-56) H. Approval of Change Order No. 5 for Valley View Road Improvements, Page 529 I.C. 51-272 I. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 14-88 Amending City Code Section 271-1 Subd. and Adopting by Reference City Code Chapter 1 and Section 2.99, which, among Other Things, Contain Penalty Provisions (Board of Adjustments and Appeals) J. Resolution No. 88-57 Proclaiming April as Cable Television Month K. JENKINS ADDITION by John Jenkins. 2nd Reading of Ordinance #60- 87, Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.61 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Jenkins' Addition; and Adoption of Resolution #88-13, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #60-87 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 5.61 acres into 2 lots and one outlot. Location: North of Research Road, south of Ridgewood West. (Ordinance #60-87, Rezoning; Resolution #88-I3, Authorizing Summary and Publication) L. CREEKVIEW by Brown Land Company (Bell Oaks First Addition) 2nd Reading of Ordinance #8-88-PUD-1-88, Rezoning from Rural to PUD-1- 88-R1-13.5; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Creekview; and Adoption of Resolution #88-41, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #8- 88-PUD-1-88 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 78.22 acres with PUD variances, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1- 13.5 on 60.15 acres, Preliminary Plat of 78.22 acres into 93 single family lots and 2 outlots. Location: South of Bluffs East 4th Page 532 Page 533 Page 536 Page 544 City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,April 5, 1988 Addition, north of Riverview Road. (Ordinance #8-88-PUD- 1-88; Resolution #88-41, Authorizing Summary and Publication) M. Request for Grading Permit by Scott Brau 16201 Pioneer Trail to fill and level his yard area N. Authorization for Roof Repair at 8950 Eden Prairie Road O. Radios and Police Parking Lot P. Change Order No. 2 Fire Stations Contract IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS Page 556 Page 557 Page 558 Page 559 Page 387 A. Street and Utility Improvements on Golden Triangle Drive, I.C. 52-110 Tesolution No. 88-33) Continued from March 1, 1988 B. WOODDALE CHURCH, by Wooddale Church. Request for Planned Unit Page 560 Development Concept Amendment on 31 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Amendment with the Public Zoning District on 31 acres with variance for structure height to 200 feet, and Environmental Assessment Worksheet Review for the construction of 200,000 square feet of church and educational uses. Location: Southwest corner of Shady Oak Road and Bryant Lake Drive. (Resolution #88-43, PUD Concept Amendment to Overall Wooddale PUD Concept; Ordinance #15-88, Amending Ordinance #81-27 within the Public District; Resolution #88-44, Submitting Finding of No Significant Impact for Environmental Assessment Worksheet) C. THE FARM 2ND ADDITION by Countryside Investments, Inc. Request for p age 580 Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.95 acres and from ' Public to R1-13.5 on 4.7 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 30 acres into 17 lots and 1 outlot. Location: North of the intersection of Duck Lake Trail and Loralee Lane. (Ordinance #16-88, Rezoning; Resolution #88-45, Preliminary Plat) D. GOLF POINT by Associated Investments, Inc. Request for Page 587 Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on 2.8 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 and Preliminary Platting of 2.8 acres into 15 lots and 1 outlot for construction of 15 townhouse units. Location: South of Valley View Road, east of the Chicago & Northwestern Railroad. (Resolution #88-46, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; Ordinance #16-88, Rezoning; Resolution #88-47, Preliminary Plat) E. EDEN PLACE CENTER by Prairie Entertainment Associates. Request for page 597 Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment and Zoning District Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser District on 6.42 acres and Preliminary Platting of 6.42 acres into 1 lot for construction of 52,000 square feet of retail and restaurant use. Location: West of Glen Lane, south and east of Eden Road. (Resolution #88-48, PUD Concept Amendment to Overall Eden Glen PUD; Ordinance #5-88, Zoning District Amendment; Resolution #88-49, Preliminary Plat) F. ALPINE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION by Red Rock Heights Partnership. Request for Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 8.4 acres with lot depth variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Preliminary Platting of 8.4 acres into 17 single family lots and road right-of-way. Location: East of Alpine Trail, South Page 606 City Council Agenda - 4 - Tues.,April 5, 1988 of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad. (Resolution #88-50, Denial of Second Reading of Ordinance 20-87; Ordinance #6- 88, Rezoning; Resolution #88-5I, Preliminary Plat) V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. FLYING CLOUD OFFICE WAREHOUSE CONDOMINIUM by Eugene M. Branstrom. Request for Site Plan Review within the 1-2 District on 2.29 acres for construction of a 9,848 square foot office/warehouse. Location: South of Pioneer Trail at Yorkshire Lane, North of County Road #1. Page 616 Page 617 B. Request By Woody Ginkel New Rink Committee Page 623 VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS IX. APPOINTMENTS A. Appointment of two members to the Board of Adjustments & Appeals Page 626 (one for a two-year term and one for a three-year term) X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members B. Report of City Manager I. Discussion on Development Phasing Page 627 2. Discussion on Downtown Area Planning Page 628 3. City Participation in T.H. 5 Project Page 629 C. Report of City Attorney D. Report of Director of Planning E. Report of Director of Community Services I. Comprehensive Park Plan Revised Contract and Scope of Page 633 Services F. Report of Director of Public Works G. Report of Finance Director XI. NEW BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Natalie Swaggert Director of Human Resources & Services SUBJECT: Human Services Model DATE: March 30, 1988 On Tuesday, April 5th, the Human Rights and Services Commission will formally present the proposed Human Services Model to you. At the completion of the presentation you will be asked to do the following: 1) Formally agree to support the proposed Model and allow the Commission to proceed with an implementation plan. 2) Designate a representative to participate on the Human Services Coordinating Council (HSCC) for a period of two years. Members of the Commission will attend the Joint Meeting and will be available to answer questions regarding the procect. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 1988 7:30 PM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE COUNCIL MEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia Pidcock City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Asst. to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, City Assessor Steven Sinell, Director of Community Services Robert Lambert, Recording Secretary Sue Anderson. ROLL CALL: All members were present. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following items were added to the Agenda: X.A.1. Discussion on Sanitary Landfill Permit; X.A.2. Discuss Special Meeting for Proposed Downtown; X.B.3. Request for Proposals for Planning & Engineering Assistance to Develop Phasing Plans of Southwest Area of Eden Prairie. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve the Agenda and Other Items of Business, as published and amended. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES A. Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday, December 28, 1987. MOTION: Pidcock moved, Harris seconded to approve the Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday, December 28, 1987 as published. Motion carried unanimously. B. Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, January 5, 1988. The following changes were made: Page 8., Paragraph 1, Line 1 should read: Harris stated she would be willing to participate in a meeting. Page 8, Paragraph 5, Line 1, Word 2, should read: recommended. Page 8, Paragraph 5, Line 2, add sentence: Council by consent agreed. Eden Prairie City Council 2 February 16, 1988 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, January 5, 1988, as published and amended. Motion carried unanimously. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List B. Request for Grading Permit by Riley-Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District for 16011 & 16101 Pioneer Trail C. Change Order No. 1 Layne Western Contract for Well Drilling I.C. 52-072B D. Change Order No. 1 and 2 Barbarossa Contract for Well House Construction, I.C. 52-0728 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson to approve Items A-D on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS None V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 40400-40665 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to approve the Payment of Claims Nos. 40400-40665. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Harris, Pidcock and Peterson voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS None VII. A. EASEMENT REQUEST FROM NORTHERN STATES POWER FOR POWERLINE ALONG T.H. 5 City Manager Jullie reported that negotiations have continued with Northern States Power Company for a powerline easement along Highway 5, and City Attorney Pauly would report the outcome. Pauly requested a few moments to go over the latest document. MOTION 1: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to table the discussion on the NSP Powerline. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION 2: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to move NSP issue off the table. Motion carried unanimously. Eden Prairie City Council 3 February 16, 1988 Pauly stated NSP was willing to give $60,000 for the easement. The terms of the easement document negotiated stated that the City would maintain the walkways over the easements, and a provision that the City would not request NSP to relocate the lines during the first 15 years unless the City paid for the total cost. Thereafter a prorated shift of the cost would occur until the 20th year, when NSP would pay all relocation costs. The question was raised regarding the knowledge that the property in question was a dedicated park land and as a part of the legal status of the land, Eliason Builders was the fee owner. If the land was not used as park property, would it revert to him the fee owner? Pauly reported that in the event of litigation, he believed that granting of the easement would not trigger reversion to grantor of the park property. As a result, NSP has requested language that the property would remain in park use in perpetuity of the agreement, which currently the dedication of the land requires. Ralph Towler, NSP lawyer, suggested language in the resolution which would authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the easement in the form previously outlined to the Manager over what was designated as parcels 2B and 2L subject to the Council being satisfied that the granting of the said easement would not operate to discontinue the City's use of the easement area for park purposes. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to approve easement requested by NSP with the condition that language be approved by the City Attorney to insure that granted easement will not impair the City's ability to continue the use of the property for park purposes. Motion carried unanimously. VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS A. REPORT OF RESIDENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROPOSED DOWNTOWN SITE FOR CITY HALL Assistant to City Manager Dawson highlighted the recommenda- tions from the committee. The committee met and 13 of the 22 were present to evaluate the proposed area. The committee recommended the following on a 12-1 vote. 1) The proposed downtown location east of Prairie Center Drive be included in the list of recommended sites. 2) This location be considered equally acceptable to the other recommended sites which was preferred no less or no more than other sites. 3) Acquisition negotiations on this site should be done concurrently with the other recommended sites. Bentley inquired about the member who voted no. Dawson replied that this person indicated no specific reason for dissent, but that he had expressed discomfort with the concept of a specific downtown area. Eden Prairie City Council 4 February 16, 1988 Dawson concluded that the major variable and where it would rank with the recommended site was the cost. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to receive the recommenda- tions as presented by the Residents Advisory Committee on Proposed Downtown Site for City Hall. Motion carried unanimously. IX. APPOINTMENTS A. BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS Appointment of 2 Representatives to serve three-year terms commencing March 1, 1988 and expiring February 28, 1991. Pidcock nominated Neil E. Akmann and Scott Anderson. Bentley nominated Roger Sandvick and John Freemyer. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to close the nominations. Motion carried unanimously Peterson stated to Council to vote for two. Bentley pointed out that a unanimous vote would be required for Sandvick, because he had served more than two consecutive three-year terms. Voting for Akmann: Anderson, Harris, Peterson, Pidcock Voting for Anderson: Pidcock Voting for Sandvick: Anderson, Bentley Voting for Freemyer: Bentley, Harris, Peterson B. BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS Appointment of 2 Representatives to serve three-year terms commencing March 1, 1988 and expiring February 28, 1991. Pidcock nominated Mike Zachman and Allan Callander. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to close nominations and cast a unanimous ballot for Mike Zachman and Allan Callander. Motion carried unanimously. C. FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION Appointment of 2 Resident Representatives to serve three-year terms commencing March 1, 1988 and expiring February 28, 1991. Bentley nominated David Parker and Dennis Larson. Eden Prairie City Council 5 February 16, 1988 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to close nominations and cast a unanimous ballot for David Parker and Dennis Larson. Motion carried unanimously. D. HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL COMMISSION Appointment of 3 Representatives to serve three-year terms commencing March 1, 988 and expiring February 28, 1991. Pidcock appointed Laurie Koering, Steven White and John Hensrud. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to close nominations and cast a unanimous ballot for Laurie Koering, Steven White and John Hensrud. Motion carried unanimously. E. HUMAN RIGHTS AND SERVICES COMMISSION Appointment of 5 Representatives: 2 to fill unexpired terms commencing immediately and expiring February 28, 1990; and 3 to fill three-year terms commencing March 1, 1988 and expiring February 28, 1991. Bentley nominated, for the two unexpired terms to February 28, 1990, Peter Iversen and Melanie Voris. MOTION 1: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to close nominations and cast a unanimous ballot for Peter Iversen, and Melanie Voris. Motion carried unanimously. Pidcock nominated Virginia Gartner, Peg Johnson and Ellie Norberg. MOTION 2: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to close nominations and cast a unanimous ballot for Virginia Gartner, Peg Johnson and Ellie Norberg. Motion carried unanimously. F. PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Appointment of 2 Representatives to serve three-year terms commencing March 1, 1988 and expiring February 28, 1991. Bentley nominated Bud Baker and Ann Boline. Pidcock nominated Patrick Richard. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to close the nominations. Motion carried unanimously. Eden Prairie City Council 6 February 16, 1988 Voting for Baker: Anderson, Bentley, Harris, Peterson, Pidcock Voting for Richard: Anderson, Harris, Peterson Voting for Boline: Bentley, Pidcock G. PLANNING COMMISSION Appointment of 2 Representatives to serve three-year terms commencing March 1, 1988 and expiring February 28, 1991. Harris nominated Julianne Bye and Christine Dodge. Bentley nominated Doug Reuter. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to close the nominations. Motion carried unanimously Voting for Bye: Anderson, Bentley, Harris, Peterson, Pidcock Voting for Dodge: Anderson, Bentley, Harris, Peterson, Pidcock Voting for Reuter: None X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. DISCUSSION ON SANITARY LANDFILL PERMIT Anderson reported that the permit for the operation of the Pollution Control Agency at the landfill expired on the 28th of January. He inquired if the City has any options and if so, should it take action. Pauly responded that he wrote to the PCA shortly after January 28th and reminded it of the expiration, and that he was waiting for a response. Pauly commented that he had read that someone from the PCA stated that as long as an application for expansion had been filed then the permit would continue in effect. Pauly did not necessarily agree with that position or conclusion. He did not propose taking action at the present time, but felt the City should wait for some appropriate time for response. Anderson stated that the City was aware of the problems on the landfill and that if the Council was to act responsibly, should it allow a corporation to continue to dump garbage without a permit. Pauly responded that one alternative would be to bring an action against the PCA in the form of a mandamus action to require enforcement of its own permit as the City does not have the authority to do that. Council directed Pauly to pursue legal alternatives and follow up and inform Council whatever transpires. Eden Prairie City Council 7 February 16, 1988 2. DISCUSSION OF SPECIAL MEETING REGARDING PROPOSED DOWNTOWN Bentley suggested a special meeting be held to discu s s t h e proposed downtown development in the major center ar e a . He felt it was important for Council to make a state m e n t o r take a position on the City's willingness to proceed o n t h e project. The meeting could result in a consensus of w h a t t h e City hopes to accomplish. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to hold a specia l m e e t i n g for Discussion of Downtown Development on Tuesday, Ma r c h 8 , 1988 at 3:30 PM in Council Chambers. Council requested that the Finance Director begin ex p l o r i n g possible financial avenues in order for the City to p a r t i c i p a t e in the development. B. Report of City Manager 1. AWARD CONTRACT FOR REFURBISHMENT OF FIRE ENGINE NO.1 Jullie referred to the memo to the Council dated Febr u a r y 1 1 , 1988, outlining the award of a contract to refurbish a f i r e engine and what the cost would be associated with the w o r k , and the funding for said item. Staff was recommendin g t h a t Custom Fire Apparatus, Inc. be awarded the bid to ref u r b i s h Engine No. 1 for the bid submitted February 9, 1988. Peterson asked if another fire unit would be retired i n the process. Jullie responded affirmatively. Harris inquired about the impact of the proposal in r e g a r d t o the adequacy of the number of light rescue trucks. J u l l i e responded that the original program was to have a l i g h t r e s c u e truck in each of the four stations. Under the new r e s p o n s e plan, Station No. 2, at Technology Drive and 169, wil l b e m o r e of a storage area for different kinds of fire fight i n g equipment and hence not need a light rescue truck f o r r e s p o n s e . MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to award the bid t o refurbish Fire Engine No. 1 per its bid submitted Fe b r u a r y 9 , 1988 at a cost not to exceed $87,685, and further t h a t i t s trade-in allowance of $30,000 for Fire Engine No. 4 b e accepted. Motion carried unanimously. 2. BOARD OF REVIEW PROCESS City Assessor Sinell said that in accordance with th e C o u n c i l ' s request to smooth the process of the Board of Review , s t a f f h a d surveyed other cities' practices, examined Eden Prai r i e ' s practices and suggested changes which would be imple m e n t e d Eden Prairie City Council 8 February 16, 1988 before the Board of Review's first meeting on April 28, 1988. Six recommendations were developed for Council's approval. Sinell stated the main change was the request for a written application by the taxpayers giving details regarding their review. Bentley requested the application contain only questions they could answer from memory. He commented if it was complex, they would not be able to fill it out the evening of the review process. Peterson requested a few paragraphs at the beginning of the form to introduce the procedure. Pidcock requested a simple review form in order for citizens to appeal without filling out a complicated form. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve recommendations subject to Council giving final approval on application form. Motion carried unanimously. 3. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PLANNING AND ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE TO DEVELOP PHASING PLANS OF SOUTHWEST AREA Jullie reported that there has been a substantial interest on the part of property owners anticipating development and property sales are moving along in the southwest area. He continued that the City Planning, Engineering, and Community Services have done a fair amount of preliminary work in trying to develop the initial phasing plan in this area. Staff requested authorization to receive proposals from planning and engineering consultants outside that could help them pull the phasing plan all together. Jullie pointed out that at the pace of interest, the City cannot afford the luxury of moving too slowly. He requested that the Council authorize the City to secure proposals for appropriate planning and engineering consultants and come back to Council with recommendations. Pidcock inquired if this will be open to all engineering and planning consultants in the City. Jullie responded that he preferred that they have a good knowledge of the area and are familiar with the basic comprehensive planning, utilities and drainage specifications of the City. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to authorize Staff to secure proposals for appropriate planning and engineering consultants and return to Council with recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. Eden Prairie City Council 9 February 16, 1988 C. Report of City Attorney Pauly reminded the Council that the PCA Citizens Meeting would be held on February 17, 1988 at the Community Room at the Eden Prairie Shopping Center. This would be a citizen review meeting and he would be present and make a short statement that the City intended to seek a contested case hearing. D. Report of Director of Planning None E. Report of Director of Community Services 1. PROPOSAL REGARDING EDENVALE GOLF COURSE Community Services Director Lambert introduced the proposal form the Edenvale Golf Course for the sale of the course to the City. He felt this was a significant proposal and deserved quite a bit of review. He proposed a review by staff following up the figures that Edenvale presented and having the City Finance Department and Assessing Department contribute their comments. At that point Staff would recommend if it was or was not feasible to proceed to Phase II of the analysis, which would consist of audits and appraisals from outside sources of the data to evaluate the full proposal. Peterson stated that after preliminary data was submitted, public comments should be received. Harris inquired about the letter from Cedar Hills Golf Course and if they were offering their course. Lambert responded no, it had just discussed offering land in that part of town for a public course. He continued that they learned about the Edenvale offer and did not want the City to forget that possibility. Lambert stated that the final recommendation would compare costs of acquisition and/or development. Bentley clarified for the record that Cedar Hills did not make any formal request or proposal and that City was not making any recommendation relative to or along that line. Lambert responded affirmatively. Harris clarified her understanding that at the time this proposed study was under review, all possibilities including the content of the conversations with the owners of Cedar Hills will be considered. Lambert responded affirmatively. Peterson concluded that the offer from Edenvale has precipitated a more specific study of the whole concept of one or more municipal courses in the City, and not just the feasibility of Eden Prairie purchasing Edenvale. Eden Prairie City Council 10 February 16, 1988 Bentley stated the City must not lose sight in this review process that the land that makes up the Edenvale Golf Course was part and parcel of the density transfer allowance for lots in the entire Edenvale Development. There could be the inference that this land could be lost to development and he did not want that to happen. Pidcock inquired about the timeline. Adrian Herbst, lawyer for Edenvale, stated a timeline was discussed with City staff. There was an understanding that preliminary ideas could be ascertained in 60 days. They also understood that it would not be possible to have the property acquired and go into operation as a City course in this calendar year. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve the Staff recommendations to proceed with the review process on the Edenvale Golf Course proposal. Motion carried unanimously. Bentley noted the City was responding to a specific proposal that has come before the City and not propagating any sort of plans to develop a mimicipal golf course, and responding in such a way that it was not costing additional taxpayer dollars. Lambert responded that the Staff review will be back in sixty days. 2. SENIOR CENTER IMPROVEMENTS Staff proposed funding to finish the Senior Center improvements. He reported that a grant was received for improving the Center but did not cover work in the kitchen. This request was for kitchen cabinets, sink, stove and refrigerator. At present, Seniors cannot serve meals but with improvements they can hold potluck events. The projected cost would be $11,500 to bring it up to usable fashion. Staff recei'red two quotes for cabinetry in amounts of $6,200 and $6,700; however, it is looking into purchasing preconstructed cabinetry and installing them. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson to authorize transfer of appropriate funds of $11,500 form the General Fund to complete the kitchen at the Senior Center. Motion carried unanimously. Bentley inquired why the original community development block grant request was denied. Lambert responded that the original grant request was for $60,000 and half was for the kitchen. City received $30,000 for non-kitchen improvements. The State & County Health Departments' code requirements to serve hot meals result in costs of $60,000 for the kitchen to meet code. Staff went forward with that cost in applying for a discretionary grant; it was denied. Eden Prairie City Council 11 February 16, 1988 Lambert stated the Center can operate in the present status for a couple of years, after which the City would then return for a grant request to complete the kitchen according to code. Pidcock requested that during the completion of the kitchen, heating ducts should be placed on the floor if possible. F. Report of Director of Public Works None G. Report of Finance Director XI. NEW BUSINESS None XII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to adjourn the meeting at 8:45 PM. Motion carried unanimously. c's UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL STAFF: 7:30 PM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia Pidcock. City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Asst. to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Community Services Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Sue Anderson. m TUESDAY, MARCH 1, 1988 COUNCIL MEMBERS: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: All members were present. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following items were added to the Agenda: X.A.1. Update on Light Rail Transit Meeting; X.A.2. Consideration of Mr. Paul Redpath for the C. C. Ludwig Award; X.A.3. Discussion on NSP; X.A.4. Public Utilities and Their Responsibilities; X.A.5. Discussion on City Hall Extending Hours; X.B.3. Review of Board of Review Application Form. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve the Agenda and Other Items of Business, as published and amended. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 1988 The following changes were made: Page 1, Paragraph 4, Line 10, Word 1, change to: concluded; Page 6, Motion 1, Motion 2, Motion 3 and Motion 4, Line 1, change to read: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris...; Page 5, Paragraph 2, Line 3, should read: Council would deal with it at that time; Page 9, Paragraph 3, Line 1, change to: Council directed Staff to update Council at the next meeting. 7 Page 10, Full Paragraph 1, Line 2, change to read: Bentley suggested this be passed on to City Manager Jullie...; Page 11, Paragraph 10, Line 2, Word 2, should read: should; Page 12, Paragraph 3, Line 2, change to read: funding not to exceed $3500 to distribute Human... MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson to approve the Minutes of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, February 2, 1988, as published and amended. Motion carried unanimously. Eden Prairie City Council 2 March 1, 1988 III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List B. Final Plat approval for Donnay's Round Lake Estates 2nd (located west of Evener Way, south of Lorence Way in the south half of Section Seven) Resolution No. 88-32 C. Change Order No. 2 for the Water Treatment Plant Expansion, Project 52-072A D. Recommendation to hire Consultant for Updating the Comprehensive Park & Open Space Plan Pidcock inquired what was offered in the $22,000 bid. Lambert stated it was an inadequate proposal that did not address the request for proposal and was not worthwhile. Bentley asked Staff what went into the decision of a unanimous recommendation for Barton Aschman Associates. Lambert responded that a very thorough review of the existing park system and its needs were presented, and showed a strong desire to involve the citizens of Eden Prairie in the study process. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve Items A-D on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS ON GOLDEN TRIANGLE DRIVE, I.C. 52-110 (Resolution No. 88-33) City Manager Jullie reported that the notice of this public hearing was published in the February 17th and 24th issue of Eden Prairie News and sent out to two property owners in the area of this project. Correspondence from Mr. Gary Gandrud representing his client Herliev Helle had been presented asking the Council to continue this item until the 1st meeting in April. Jim Stilen, 3300 Piper Building, Minneapolis, attorney for Hoyt Development, requested to speak. He stated that Mr. Dietz told him before the meeting the request for delay had been made. He asked the Council not to delay, because Hoyt had been waiting since last May to get this process completed. He stated that Hoyt was disadvantaged by not having that north-south connector go through. It was rumored to him that Helle was trying to complete a sale of his property, but that would not contribute to the merits of the project. He concluded that the project must be completed and was hopeful the Council would go forward with the hearing and not further delay the project. Eden Prairie City Council 3 March 1, 1988 Peterson inquired as to some reasons that this should be continued. Anderson agreed that this project has been talked about for years, and was not a new project. Jullie replied that Mr. Gandrud was not here this evening to participate in the hearing. Gandrud had suggested to Jullie that there may indeed be a new property owner and that being the case, there could be an easement dedication rather than condemnation process. Jullie said this could be a reasonable rationale to continue the hearing. As far as the project schedule was concerned, the delay would not impair the ability to get the job done this year. Jullie felt work on plans and specifications could take place in the interim so as not to delay the project. Dietz replied that there were two possibilities in delaying the project. It would add 30 days to the process or it may be able to resolve some issues. The City has certain risks involved because of the opposition of Mr. Helle on the project. If the City can resolve some of those issues in 30 days, it may well speed the project up. It could give Helle more time to prepare arguments against the project. He felt it was in the City's best interest to continue this for 30 days. Harris asked if the issues on the table were known to the City and could they be addressed in 30 days. Pauly replied the issues have been defined and there were serious issues that may or may not be resolved. If they were resolved, it would make the decision to proceed much easier. Bentley requested a definition of the risks being taken in this proposal, and what amount of time would be saved if there was not a challenge whereby the City received dedication rather than go through condemnation. Dietz replied that the risks began in 1984-85 when the Norseman Industrial Park came through the City process. The City looked at requiring Helle to extend Golden Triangle Drive south to his south property line. Because that right- of-way was not encompassed within the platted area proposed at that time, the City determined that it could not require that. Instead, the Developer's Agreement for the project stated that with the next phase, any subdivision or development in the area, Helle would be required to dedicate the right-of-way and construct the roadway. Hoyt then proposed its Technology Park projects and there was some discussion of the roadway. Dietz replied that Helle's attorney stated that there was economic value in the dirt in the right-of-way, and economic value in the right-of-way itself, and that the contract with Eden Prairie City Council 4 March 1, 1988 the City allowed Helle to build the road at his pleasure. The risks were as follows: 1) if the City proceeds with the project, Helle would be able to argue the degree of benefit; 2) if Helle chooses to delay the project, the City would have to go through condemnation which would be approximately a 3- 1/2 month process; 3) the right-of-way costs are assessable, but what was proposed in the feasibility study was that right-of-way costs be added to Belle's assessment. The amount he could contest would increase and there would be the risk on the part of the City that whatever was not sustained through the assessment process, the City would have to pay. If these things were resolved and it was agreeable, Norseman Industrial Park could construct the roadway. Bentley commented that this was an extremely important roadway and the congestion in the area was getting worse. At present the north/south traffic flow was critical. He did not want to delay the process for another month, but at that same time, in delaying, the worse that would be done would be the lossof 30 days. Pidcock had a problem with Belle's letter being delivered just before the meeting, and asked Staff to reiterate the benefits of this project for the City. Dietz replied that the traffic circulation in the industrial parks would be improved, as would emergency access into the industrial parks. There was a wide range of benefits for the project. Anderson inquired if the project was delayed for 30 days what was the anticipated completion date. Dietz replied that if the project were subsequently approved, it would be done 30 days later. If condemnation was the process, he felt a bid opening would begin in mid to late August. Dietz indicated this was a very small project, only 330' long, and the time to construct it, making it passable for traffic, would take from 30 to 45 days. Harris stated her unhappiness regarding the hand-delivery of the letter the day of the meeting. She felt after hearing the pros and cons of moving ahead or delaying for 30 days, that the City would be better served by delaying 30 days. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson to delay consideration of Street and Utility Improvements on Golden Triangle Drive and continue the public hearing to April 5, 1988. (Motion carried unanimously after discussion, see page 5.) Bentley commented that he was not thrilled with the continuation and hoped Council was not being manipulated. a Eden Prairie City Council 5 March 1, 1988 Stilen stated he had listened to the Council's concerns and understood the risks. He did not believe Helle had a buyer, and was concerned about what would happen in 30 days. If Helle did sell the property, what buyer would agree to dedicating the roadway until he had a project through there, which would take 3 or 4 months? Peterson stated if the new buyer did dedicate the land and agree to assessment, the City would not lose anything, and the goodwill would be there regardless. Brad Hoyt, of Hoyt Development, stated he would be comfortable with whatever the Council decided. He indicated he appeared before the Council February 4, 1987 regarding the feasibility study and was greatly disappointed that it took a full year to complete this report. He continued that he could not develop any more with the limited access that was available. The timing of his next project would be affected by the timing of this roadway project. He further stated that a year ago when everyone spoke of this matter, everyone was of the mind that the City would proceed with condemnation. Bentley stated he did not support the motion due to the fact that even if there was a buyer it would not change anything and every time the City does a project there was risk involved. He felt it was important that the road be built and to hasten the construction which would not be done by continuing the project. Anderson felt it may be advantageous for the City to wait and hear this issue completely. Harris made clear that she was not persuaded in making this motion that there were any significant risks to the City, but was persuaded to make the motion by the opportunity for consensus. Bentley stated four positive votes were necessary to approve the project and, assuming that there was a strong sentiment to continue, approval was not likely tonight. He stated that by not having a 4/5 vote the project would be rejected. No further discussion on the issue. Motion passed 4-1 (Peterson opposing). B. WEST 5 BUSINESS CENTER by John T. Smith. Zoning District Change from I-General to 1-2 Park on 4.68 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Preliminary Platting of 4.68 acres into two lots for construction of a 34,752 square foot office/warehouse Eden Prairie City Council 6 March 1, 1988 building. Location: East of Fuller Road and Northwest of the Chicago & Northwestern Railway (ordinance No. 12-88 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 88-34 - Preliminary Plat). Jullie reported that notice of this public hearing was sent out to 24 property owners and published in the February 17th issue of the Eden Prairie News. Paul Neilson, with Smith Architects, representing the owner, reported that West 5 Business Center was designed to meet needs of small and growing businesses. It would consist of office warehouse spaces in small units, with access to support services such as clerical, telephone answering, and conference rooms. The applicant proposed to develop the facility and sought Zoning District Change from I-General to 1-2. The Developer would also seek a variance for lot frontage from the Board of Appeals. They would upgrade the landscape, parking and driveways in accordance with City Ordinances. Enger reported that this proposal was reviewed at the February 8th Planning Commission Meeting and was recommended for approval to the City Council for the rezoning and replatting. The Commission felt it was an improvement in the area. A variance would be necessary because 200 ft. frontage was required in the 1-2 zone, and the present frontage on the lot was 57 ft. From a practical standpoint, the site plan works very well with a 57 ft. frontage. The Commission felt it was an improvement to the area and recommended approval. Enger stated an additional change had been made which was the proposed 3,200 square foot addition had been changed to only 2,300 square feet. The addition would enhance the appearance of the structure and was consistent with the objectives of the Planning Commission. Enger concluded that Staff would run the numbers through for assurance that 30% ratio was in line. Bentley inquired about further additional parking requirements for the additional square footage. Enger replied it was not required. Bentley inquired about traffic generation and the impact on the intersection of Fuller Road and Highway 5. Enger responded that a slight traffic increase was expected but no impact would be felt. He added that the Fuller Road situation would be corrected with the Highway 5 upgrade. No comments were heard from the audience. MOTION 1: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried unanimously. t Eden Prairie City Council 7 March 1, 1988 MOTION 2: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to approve 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 12-88 for Rezoning. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION 3: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 40666-41006 MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Payment of Claims Nos. 40666-41006. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Harris, Pidcock and Peterson voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution No. 88-31, Amending Resolution No. 88-09 Regulating Fees & Charges for Municipal Services Bentley inquired about the fee for tots 4 years and under being $1.50 accompanied by adult. Does the $1.50 pay for the tot and the adult; or was it just the tot, and if so why would the tot be more expensive than a youth 5 to 18 years. Jullie stated the $1.50 was for tot and adult. MOTION: Harris moved, Pidcock seconded to approve the fees in Resolution No. 88-31. Motion carried unanimously. VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. James Zahler 17200 Cedar Crest Drive, request for Grading Permit for Excavation of an Existing Pond Jullie reported that James Zahler excavated a portion of the pond on his property to maintain a constant water level from what was experienced as seasonal drying of the pond. Staff prepared a memo of chronological events surrounding the matter which came to an issue in the courts. Zahler was charged with land alteration without a permit. He has now submitted his plans for completion of the work. Zahler did not wish to speak when asked to present the issue. Anderson inquired if this was designated wildlife area requiring a permit from the D 14 9 Dietz responded that the DNR indicated it was not a protected wetland. •-:;1 `.'," I Eden Prairie City Council 8 March 1, 1988 Peterson, referring to the topographic survey prepared by Carderella and Associates, which depicted the excavated area was 40' wide and 60' long and adjacent to the property line, inquired if Staff had been able to determine the results of the excavation on the swamp or lowland area. Dietz replied that the dotted line on the topography was within the swamp area. The swamp was on Zahler's land and the adjacent property. Dietz stated Zahler excavated a portion of the swamp to create some open water on a more permanent basis. Peterson inquired what effect that would have on the swamp area to the east. Dietz did not see a negative effect but that there would always be water standing in the pond when the rest of the swamp was dry. Discussion followed on the method of configuring water level on the overall swamp area. Peter Lilly, 17120 Cedar Crest Drive, describing the situation from his viewpoint, stated a 6' deep hole was dug on Zahler's property east of his property line. The water level diminishes earlier as a result and the Zahler property looks great with the pond, while he was left with swamp. Lilly concluded by asking Council why does the City have permits and rules if a person can get a permit after the fact. If this were the procedure, then he would follow this procedure in the future as well. Pauly stated that water rights to a shared parcel of water or pond were subject to reasonable use by those who have access. Charles Webber, 17249 Valley Road, stated the marsh was dry before Zahler did his excavating. He thought it was a drainage ditch prior to the dispute. He did not see that there was damage or why it was such a big issue. Lilly responded that on the Webber's side it was a swamp, but on his side it was a pond. Webber inquired if he bought some of Zahler's land, would he have to do the restoration. Bentley stated the essence of the issue was a question of the validity of the Council issuing an ex post facto land alteration permit. The question of water rights and the impact on the pond area, etc. could be argued by the engineers; however, do people have the right to make land alteration without a permit. The courts have agreed with the City and now the question was does the City issue a permit on an after-the-fact basis. If the City denies the permit, ,r Eden Prairie City Council 9 March 1, 1988 restoration would be required to fill in the pond and bring it back to the original contour. Pidcock inquired about the trees. Zahler replied only one substantial tree was cut down the rest were dead trees. Lilly disagreed and stated he witnessed whole trees being placed in the pond, as well as a number of trees, scrub trees and stumps with roots. The stumps on the land were covered up with dirt. Harris inquired to Zahler as to why he not do this excavation in a legal way. He had no answer, but explained that when City Staff informed him that a permit was required, they instructed him to clean up the area and make it presentable. Zahler stated he told them that was his intent but that they stopped him. His intent was to dig about 3 feet deep into the pond but the backhoe worked so quickly, it was 6 feet before he realized it. He stated the dirt was used to cover up the trashy area along the bank. Peterson stated the Council wanted to be fair but Council was struggling with this due to the fact that he had continued with the work despite the notification by City and court decisions. MOTION 1: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley to deny the permit and order restoration of the land to its original condition. Pidcock inquired if the original condition was recorded. Anderson replied the original condition would be the 6' foot hole be filled to original level, and concern regarding stumps not be addressed. Duane Cable, 17181 Cedarcrest Drive, stated that Zahler solved the soil erosion in the area by diverting the water. The City refused to do anything about the problem, but it chastises the man who did something about the drainage into the pond. Dietz understood that a 40' x 60' x 6' pond was dug and was not aware that it aided a problem in the area. Lilly stated that Cable did not live on the pond, but was south of his property on Cedarcrest. Anderson inquired how many residents live directly on the pond. Lilly replied five. Anderson felt the Council could respond if they heard from those people directly affected. Peterson requested that in the next 30-45 days that the people in the neighborhood meet and attempt to come up with a Eden Prairie City Council 10 March 1, 1988 solution speaking to the issues, the Council could continue this matter. Bentley felt the Council had the authority to deny a permit and not ask that any restoration work be done. The Council had that capability because of one mitigating condition and that was that restoration would be more disruptive than leaving it in the present stage. Council should leave the option open for possible restoration in case there was indeed damage to the system that was present. Harris stated that Council can deny a permit where damage has been done and not order restoration. Anderson stated he would like within 30-45 days, for Staff and neighbors to agree upon what they want to see and make a report for Council to make a recommendation. He encouraged them to seek what was best for the pond and the neighbors. Bentley felt Council could not require neighbors to get together, and saw no value in continuing this matter. Zahler stated everyone would be happy if he would do what they wanted and he would put it in their way. Anderson asked to withdraw his motion and requested that Council review in 30-45 days what the Staff and neighbors have agreed upon. Pidcock stated she could not condone work without a permit or vote on restoration without knowing what the restoration consisted of. MOTION 1: Bentley made a motion to deny the permit and mandate that no restoration work be done. The motion died for lack of a second. Peterson asked for a motion to continue this for 30 days and on April 5, Council would review anything heard from the residents, and the reasonable parameters of restoration from Mr. Dietz. MOTION 2: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to continue this until the April 19th meeting when Staff would present report and recommendations for handling the restoration that would be warranted. Motion carried unanimously. VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS None — Eden Prairie City Council 11 March 1, 1988 IX. APPOINTMENTS None X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Update on Light Rail Transit Meeting Peterson reported on the progress of the downtown committee regarding discussion of tunnel versus surface. Some persons had reported that equipment for underground method was least expensive. Bentley inquired as to the Council's position on light rail, and if Council felt this was not in the best interest of the City if they were being taxed for it. Peterson stated Council agreed that no light rail would probably run through Eden Prairie for some time. Harris felt the Council should be prepared should the time arise to make a decision. 2. Consideration of Paul Redpath for C. C. Ludwig Award MOTION: Anderson moved, and Pidcock seconded to nominate Mr. Paul Redpath for the League of Minnesota Cities' C. C. Ludwig Award. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Discussion on NSP Pauly, as a private citizen and resident of the City, reported that the Board of Appeals limitation ran out on January 8th, 1988 for NSP to complete the work. He has not ordered a stop order due to his position in representing the citizens of Eden Prairie. Bentley inquired of Staff if there had been any building permits granted relative to the land construction. Staff responded that the Board of Appeals permit allowed that 95' poles could be constructed. Jullie reported that NSP prepared a plan and submitted it for City review and approval. NSP feels the project was proper and states it has permits from the State. NSP has acquired easements from private property owners; however, the City was not aware it gave permission for NSP to place the poles. Pauly reported that if the variance expired, the City would need legal advice on this, and felt the City should Eden Prairie City Council 12 March 1, 1988 retain a disinterested lawyer. A stop order was needed and this could result in a lawsuit. Pidcock stated she was in court on Friday and witnessed NSP's cavalier attitude about pole height. She felt the City did not have two weeks to wait on this matter, and a stop order should be placed immediately. Peterson also believed if things are moving fast for construction, the City should act quickly. Jullie reported that NSP stated it would be done in May 1988, and now was wanting an extension until July. Pauly reviewed the history of the easements of the property owners, of which he was one, with regard to the placement of the poles and cutting of the trees. NSP failed to indicate on plans to the Board of Appeals the location of the poles and the homes on the property. Enger stated the placement of the poles should have been discussed with property owners. MOTION: Bentley moved, and seconded by Harris to direct City Manager Jullie to procure the services of an independent outside attorney to deal with this matter and give him the authority at this point, if it becomes necessary, to file a temporary restraining order or an injunction prior to Special City Council Meeting on March 8, 1988. Motion carried unanimously. Bentley indicated that the variance had expired and NSP should appear again before the Board of Appeals. 4. Public Utilities and Their Responsibility Anderson reported that the City has made the developers responsible for the damage to trees, but the City does not hold public utilities, and governments responsible in the same manner. There has never been restoration done to areas disturbed by public utilities. He requested that an amendment to the code be made to include all governmental agencies. Pauly stated that the tree replacement policy was not a part of the City Code, but rather was a policy. He inquired if Council wanted to explore that as a part of the City Code, or an amendment to the policy. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to direct staff to prepare a an amendment to the tree replacement policy to Eden Prairie City Council 13 March 1, 1988 include governmental agencies and private concerns. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Extended Hours for City Hall Pidcock invited discussion regarding additional open hours on Saturday or possibly evenings for a couple of hours for people to take care of City Hall business. Jullie replied that the homestead registration was the only thing that has to be done in person. Everything else can done by mail. Jullie stated he would discuss it with Staff and get back to Council with recommendations. Bentley stated there could be a potential budget consideration for adding hours. Peterson asked that Pidcock with discussion with Jullie and Jullie with discussion with Staff present options to the Council for consideration at a later date. B. Report of City Manager 1. Bid Award for Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus Jullie reported that bids were received for 32 self- contained breathing apparatus units for firefighters. The units are necessary for firefighting response and safety. He recommend to Council to award the bid to Conway Fire and Safety for a total cost of $30,400. MOTION: Council awarded the bid for 32 self-contained breathing apparatus units to Conway Fire & Safety for a total cost of $30,400. Motion passed unanimously. 2. Approval of Local 49 Addendum Jullie reported that City management and representatives of the International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 49 have been negotiating a local addendum to the contract for several months. The union membership has voted to approve the changes to the contract language per the memorandum from the Director of Human Resources & Services. He asked Council to approve the contract addendum and authorize its execution. He further recommended that Council approve the addendum with respect to the vacation schedule that it be adapted to other employees. Manage-ment was attempting to bring benefits in line with other communities. MOTION: Harris moved, and seconded by Pidcock to accept and Eden Prairie City Council 14 March 1, 1988 authorize the execution of the local addendum to the contract for the International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 49. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Board of Review Application Form Jullie reported that Staff was directed to prepare an application form to be used for those folks wishing to appeal their property values. The form requests enough information to justify their rationale, and are open to changes if Council so chooses. Peterson was pleased with introductory paragraph, it was clear, distinct and brief. MOTION: Anderson moved, Bentley seconded to approve the Board of Review Application Form. Motion carried unanimously. C. Report of City Attorney Pauly requested a closed session regarding landfill litigation contests. D. Report of Director of Planning None E. Report of Director of Community Services None F. Report of Director of Public Works None G. Report of Finance Director None XI. NEW BUSINESS None X. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to adjourn at 10:40 PM. Motion carried unanimously. Executive Session Followed. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST April 5, 1988 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) PLUMBING Axel Construction Alta Mechanical, Inc. G & R Aircraft Sales, Inc. Borman Plumbing Kohlerberger Construction Eagan Plumbing & Heating F. P. Lutz & Company, Inc. H.I.S. Plumbing Co., Inc. Nelson Brothers Construction Hanson-Kleven Plumbing Oakwood Builders Heins & Sons Plumbing Prairie Construction Peterson Plumbing & Heating United Insulated Structures Corp. Lee Stull Plumbing Frank B. Surma Plumbing Co. Swanson & Schiager CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY) Anderson, Soderman, Inc. Burger Building Corporation Randy Crowell Design Concept Custom Homes Design Construction Services Howard Forbrook Kellett Builders, Inc. Klotz Construction, Inc. Lynne Homes, Inc. Midwest Fence & Mfg. Co. North Star Services Pietig Bros., Inc. Porch Living Post Construction, Inc. Jon Rohs Construction Terry Vogt Construction Scott M. Wold HEATING & VENTILATING Alta Mechanical, Inc. Northwestern Service, Inc. Harris Waldinger Corporation GAS FITTER Alta Mechanical, Inc. H.I.S. Plumbing Co., Inc. Hanson-Kleven Plumbing Hokanson Plumbing, Inc. TEK Mechanical Service, Inc. REFUSE HAULER Eden Prairie Trashtronics GAMBLING Pax Christi Catholic Church (Bingo April 9, 1988) These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licens0 activity. Pat Solie, Licensing /54 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Alan D. Gray, City Engineer . 1 FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technicia.=R e/d, DATE: March 28, 1988 SUBJECT: Bergman Addition PROPOSAL: The Developers, Richard Bergman and Richar d Z i m i n s k e , h a v e requested City Council approval of the final pl a t o f B e r g m a n A d d i t i o n , a single family residential subdivision located w e s t o f R o s e m a r y R o a d a n d south of Holly Road in the South half of Sect i o n 3 . The plat contains 2.16 acres to be divided into three single f a m i l y l o t s . Lots 1 and 3 contain existing single family homesites o f t h e D e v e l o p e r s R i c h a r d Bergman and Richard Ziminske and Lot 2 is pro p o s e d a s a n e w h o m e s i t e . HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City C o u n c i l J a n u a r y 5 , 1988, per resolution 88-08. This property has been zoned R1-22 since 1969 and no new zoning is proposed. The Developer's Agreement referred to withi n t h i s r e p o r t w a s e x e c u t e d March 15, 1988. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be p r o c e s s e d t h r o u g h t h e B o a r d o f Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities, and roadways neces s a r y t o serve this plat are currently in place and av a i l a b l e f o r e x t e n s i o n i n t o the site. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park d e d i c a t i o n a r e c o v e r e d i n t h e Developer's Agreement. BONDING: Bonding musL conform to City Code and De v e l o p e r ' s A g r e e m e n t requirements. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Ber g m a n A d d i t i o n subject to the requirements of this report, t h e D e v e l o p e r ' s A g r e e m e n t , and the following: 1. Receipt of engineering fee of $250.00. 2. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. 3. Revision of plat to show existing 5 wide drai n a g e a n d utility easement on Lot 2. CC: Richard Bergman Richard Ziminske Cardarelle & Associates CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-52 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF BERGMAN ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of BERGMAN ADDITION has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for BERGMAN ADDITION is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated MARCH 28, 1988. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on APRIL 5, 1988. Gary n. Petorson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Alan D. Gray, City Engineer FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician DATE: March 28, 1988 SUBJECT: JENKINS ADDITION PROPOSAL: The Developer, John Jenkins, has requested City Council approval o f the final plat of Jenkins Addition. Located north of Research Road a n d east of Mitchell Road, the plat contains 5.61 acres to be divided i n t o two single family lots, one outlot, and right-of-way dedication f o r street purposes. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council December 1, 1987, per Resolution No. 87-312. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report is scheduled f o r execution April 5, 1988. Second reading of Ordinance No. 60-87, changing zoning from rural to R1 - 13.5 on 5.61 acres, is scheduled for final approval by the City Counci l April 5, 1988. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Presently, there is a feasibility study underway for the improvement of Research Road and Mitchell Road. This project woul d be served with municipal utilities from Research Road and the Starrwoo d Subdivision to the west. Prior to release of the final plat, Develope r shall enter into a special assessment agreement defining Developer' s portion of construction costs for the improvement of Research Road. Access to the individual lots will be through a private drive along t h e north property line. Prior to release of the final plat, a cross-acces s agreement pertaining to use of the private drive must be submitted. 1 PAGE 2 OF 2 JENKINS ADDITION MARCH 28, 1988 As described in item #3 of the Developer's Agreement, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, a scenic easement description over th e southern portion of the property for protection of trees and stee p slopes. Scenic easement shall be designated on the final plat as a utility easement. Upon approval of the scenic easement description b y the City Engireer, Developer shall then execute and record said easement . PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. BONDING: Bonding shall conform to City Code and the Developer's Agreement requirements. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Jenkins Addition subject to the requirements, of this report, the Developer's agreement and the following: 1. Receipt of street lighting fee of $1,024.00. 2. Receipt of engineering fee of $250.00. 3. Receipt of cross-access agreement for private drive. 4. Receipt of scenic easement and corresponding revision of plat to show easement as drainage and utility easement. 5. Execution of special assessment agreement for Research Road. 6. Revision of outlot A to include addition of standard drainage and utility easements around lot perimeter. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-19 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF JENKINS ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of JENKINS ADDITION has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for JENKINS ADDITION is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated MARCH 28, 1988. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on APRIL 5, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Alan D. Gray, City Engineer FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Enginee-ing Technician DATE: March 28, 1988 SUBJECT: Starrwood PROPOSAL: The Developers, Cardallelle and Associates an d L y m a n L u m b e r , h a v e requested City Council approval of the final plat of Star r w o o d , a s i n g l e family residential subdivision located north of Researc h R o a d a n d e a s t of Mitchell Road in the North half of Section 22. The p l a t c o n t a i n s 29.19 acres to be divided into forty-three lots, two outl o t s , a n d r i g h t - of-way dedication for roadway purposes. Outlots A and B c o n t a i n . 0 3 a n d 6.76 acres respectively. Ownership of Outlots A and B w i l l b e r e t a i n e d by the Developer. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council D e c e m b e r 1 , 1987, per resolution 87-307. Second reading of Ordinance No. 56-87, changing zoning f r o m r u r a l t o R I - 13.5, was finally read and approved at the City Coun c i l m e e t i n g h e l d December 15, 1987. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this rep o r t w a s e x e c u t e d December 15, 1987. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed t h r o u g h t h e B o a r d o f Appeals. A variance would be required on Lot 9 Bloc k 2 t o a l l o w t h e 31.56 feet of frontage on Research Road; therefore, pr i o r t o r e l e a s e o f the final plat, Developer shall receive a variance f r o m t h e B o a r d o f Appeals or shall revise the plat to eliminate the lo t f r o n t a g e a l o n g Research Road. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities, roadways and walkways will be installed throughout the development in conformanc e w i t h C i t y standards and the requirements of the Developer's Agree m e n t . Prior to release of the final plat, the Developer sh a l l e n t e r i n t o a special assessment agreement with the City defining t h e D e v e l o p e r ' s portion of construction costs for the improvement a n d u p g r a d i n g o f Research Road and Mitchell Road. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedicatio n a r e c o v e r e d i n t h e Developer's Agreement. Page 2 of 2 STARRWOOD March 28, 1988 BONDING: Bonding must conform to City Code and Developer's Agreement requirements. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Starrwood sub j e c t t o the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement, and th e following: 1. Receipt of street sign fee of $1,188.00. 2. Receipt of street lighting fee of $7,056.00. 3. Receipt of engineering fee of $1,720.00. 4. Receipt of roadway easement for Starrwood Circle from the adjoining property owner for the connection to Mitchell Road. 5. Receipt of tree replacement bond for the replacement of 297 caliper Inches of trees. 6. Submission to the Building Department detailed plans for the construction of retaining walls as shown on the grading plan, as outlined in Item 5 of the Developer's Agreement. 7. Execution of special assessment agreement for construction costs in the road improvement of Research and Mitchell Roads. 8. Revision of Lot 9 Block 2 to eliminate 31.56 lot width of road frontage on Research Road or to receive Board of Appeals approval for a variance allowing said frontage on Research Road. 9. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. 10. Dedication of 20' wide easement for walkway purposes over that portion of outlot B that contains the sidewalk connection from sycamore Court to Flesher Circle. JJ:ss cc: Cardarelle & Associates Lyman Lumber CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-53 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF STARRWOOD WHEREAS, the plat of STARRWOOD has been submitted in a manner r e q u i r e d f o r platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under C h a p t e r 4 6 2 o f the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had th e r e u n d e r , a n d WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City p l a n a n d t h e regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of M i n n e s o t a a n d ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF E D E N P R A I R I E : A. Plat approval request for STARRWOOD is approved upon complia n c e with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this p l a t dated MARCH 28, 1988. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified co p y o f this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above n a m e d plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute t h e certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on APRIL 5, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Memb e r s THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manag e r Alan D. Gray, City Engineer FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technici a n t DATE: March 28, 1988 SUBJECT: Bell Oaks First Addition PROPOSAL: The Developers, Bell Oak s C o m p a n y , h a v e r e q u e s t e d C i t y C o u n c i l approval of the final plat of Bell Oa k s F i r s t A d d i t i o n , a s i n g l e f a m i l y residential subdivision located nor t h o f R i v e r v i e w R o a d a n d s o u t h o f Purgartory Creek and east of County R o a d 1 8 i n t h e n o r t h h a l f o f S e c t i o n 36. The plat contains 78.22 acres t o b e d i v i d e d i n t o 3 0 s i n g l e f a m i l y lots, 6 outlets and right-of-way d e d i c a t i o n f o r s t r e e t p u r p o s e s . Outlets A, B, C, D, E and F contai n 3 . 2 5 , 1 4 . 9 8 , 0 . 8 9 , 1 6 . 3 3 , 1 1 . 8 8 , 4.34 acres respectively. Ownership o f a l l o u t l o t s w i l l b e r e t a i n e d b y the Developer. Outlet C contains a p r i v a t e a c c e s s d r i v e . E v e n t u a l transfer of ownership of outlets E a n d F w i l l b e ' m a d e t o t h e C i t y . Outlots A, B, and D are areas of fut u r e d e v e l o p m e n t . HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l J a n u a r y 1 9 , 1988, per Resolution No. 88-16. Second reading of ordinance 08-88-PU D - 1 - 8 8 , c h a n g i n g z o n i n g f r o m r u r a l to R1-13.5-PUD-1-88, is scheduled fo r f i n a l r e a d i n g a n d a p p r o v a l a t t h e City Council meeting to be held April 5 , 1 9 8 8 . The Developer's Agreement referred t o w i t h i n t h i s r e p o r t i s s c h e d u l e d for execution april 5, 1988. VARIANCES: All variance requests not approv e d w i t h t h e P l a n n e d U n i t Development District review and zo n i n g d i s t r i c t c h a n g e m u s t b e p r o c e s s through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities, roadways, a n d w a l k w a y s will be installed throughout the pla t i n c o n f o r m a n c e w i t h C i t y S t a n d a r d s and the requirements of the Develope r ' s A g r e e m e n t . PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedicatio n a r e c o v e r e d i n t h e Developer's Agreement. Page 2 of 2 BELL OAKS FIRST ADDITION March 28, 1988 BONDING: Bonding must conform to City C o d e i n t h e D e v e l o p e r ' s A g r e e m e n t . RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the f i n a l p l a t o f B e l l O a k s F i r s t Addition subject to the requ i r e m e n t s o f t h i s r e p o r t a n d t h e D e v e l o p e r ' s Agreement and the following: I. Receipt of street sign fe e i n t h e a m o u n t o f $ 1 , 0 3 7 . 0 0 . 2. Receipt of street lighting f e e i n t h e a m o u n t o f $ 6 , 9 4 4 . 0 0 . 3. Receipt of engineering fee in t h e a m o u n t o f $ 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 4. Satisfaction of bonding requ i r e m e n t s . 5. Revision of plat to includ e d r a i n a g e a n d u t i l i t y e a s e m e n t s o v e r outlot C and through conserv a t i o n a r e a . JJ:ss cc: Bell Oaks Company Ron Krueger and Associates 60W CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-54 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF BELL OAKS FIRST ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of BELL OAKS FIRST ADDITION has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for BELL OAKS FIRST ADDITION is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated MARCH 28, 1988. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on APRIL 5, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING RFPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Alan D. Gray, City Engineer FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician DATE: March 28, 1988 SUBJECT: Windsong Two 2nd Addition PROPOSAL: The Developer, Koosman and Rice Company , h a v e r e q u e s t e d C i t y Council approval of the preliminary and final plat of W i n d s o n T w o 2 n d Addition, a multiple family residential subdivision l o c a t e d e a s t o f Anderson Lake Parkway and north of Windsong Drive. T h i s p l a t i s a replat of two existing lots containing 2 five-unit buil d i n g s i n t o 4 lots (2 lots per building site), in order to meet ce r t a i n m o r t g a g e requirements. HISTORY: Preliminary plat approval is being requested at this C i t y C o u n c i l meeting. Zoning to RM-6.5 was finally read and approved by the C i t y C o u n c i l o n September 2, 1986 per ordinance 37-86. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this repo r t w a s e x e c u t e d September 2, 1986. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed t h r o u g h t h e B o a r d o f Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities, streets, and walkways necessary to serve this site are currently in place. PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication will conform to the requirements of t h e City Code and the Developer's Agreement. BONDING: There are no bonding requirements necessary with this pr o p o s a l . RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Windsong Tw o 2 n d Addition subject to the requirements of this report a n d t h e D e v e l o p e r ' s Agreement. JJ:ss cc: Koosman and Rice Company CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-55 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF WINDSONG II 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of WINDSONG II 2ND ADDITION has been submitted in a m a n n e r required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and u n d e r Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been du l y h a d thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan a n d t h e regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesot a a n d ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PR A I R I E : A. Plat approval request for WINDSONG II 2ND ADDITION is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of. the City Engineer's report on this plat dated MARCH 28, 1988. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on APRIL 5, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Irene, Clerk 527 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-56 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT, RECEIVING REPORT AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, it is proposed to make the following improvements: I.C. 52-051, (Street, Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Improvements) and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.001 to 429.111. WHEREAS, a report has been given by the City Engineer to the City Council recommending said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: 1. The Council hereby ratifies the preparation of a feasibility report, as prepared by RCM, Inc., which advises the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment and feasibility of the proposed improvements. 2. The council will consider the aforesaid improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of property abutting or within said boundaries for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to M.S.A. Section 429.011 to 429.111, at an estimated total cost of the improvements as shown. 3. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the day, month, year, at 7:30 P.M. at the Eden Prairie City Offices, 7600 Executive Road. The City Clerk shall give published and mailed notice of such hearing on the improvements as required by law. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on APRIL 5, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 6,9,7 CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 51-272 VALLEY VIEW ROAD, COUNTY ROAD 4 TO MITCHELL ROAD CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA BM Copy City Copy Contractor Copy Inspector Copy March 1988 The following work shall be added by contract to this project: ADDITIONS BENNETT RINGROSE WOLSFELD- JARVIS-GARDNER, INC. 700 Third Street South Minneapolis, MN 55415 Estimated Unit Unit Quantity Price Amount U.D. 124 $ 0.53 $ 65.72 U.D. 133 $ 1.57 $ 208.81 U.D. 46 $ 0.81 $ 37.26 U.D. 87 $ 0.47 $ 40.89 U.D. 72 $ 1.11 $ 79.92 Seq. No. Mn/DOT No. Item 1/0563.602 AZ Flasher 2/0563.602 13 - 8 Barricade 3/0563.602 Road Closed 48 x 30 4/0563.602 Large Arrow 48 x 24 5/0563.602 Merge and Right Lane Ends 48 x 48 Subtotal $ 432.60 6/ Drainage, Berm, Grading LS LS $950.00 $ 950.00 7/2575.505 Sodding, Berm SY 102 $ 1.50 $ 153.00 Subtotal $1,103.00 8/ Erosion Control Median Barrier - Grading Labor HOUR 4.5 $ 31.00 $ 139.50 Boom Truck HOUR 5 $ 82.00 $ 410.00 Bobcat Loader HOUR 2 $ 52.00 $ 104.00 Erosion Control Median Barrier - Surfacing Labor Foreman & P.U. Bobcat Loader Plate Tamper 2341 Bituminous HOUR HOUR HOUR HOUR TON 6 $ 31.00 $ 186.00 2 $ 36.00 $ 72.00 2 $ 52.00 $ 104.00 2 $ 12.00 $ 24.00 10.2 $ 15.95 $ 162.69 Subtotal $1,202.19 Seq. No. Mn/DOT No. Item Estimated Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount Disconnect Water Service Foreman & P.U. Compressor JD 510 Backhoe Kelly Rammer Tractor Loboy Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour 10 1 5 1 5 $ 36.00 $ 13.00 $ 64.00 $ 12.00 $ 93.00 $ 369.00 $ 13.00 $ 320.00 $ 12.00 $ 465.00 Subtotal $1,170.00 10/ Install 16" B.V. (Materials Furnished by the City Water Dept.) Cat 235 Backhoe Boom Truck Foreman & P.U. Labor 3" Pump & Hoses Utility Saw Hour Hour Hour Hour LS LS 9 2 8 20 LS LS $160.00 $ 82.00 $ 36.00 $ 31.00 $ 50.00 $ 40.00 $1,440.00 $ 164.00 $ 288.00 $ 620.00 $ 50.00 $ 40.00 Subtotal $2,602.00 Grand Total Additions Contract Amendment No. 5 $6,509.79 'ecessity for Amendment Item 1-5: Item 6-7: Item 8: Item 9: Traffic control items for closing Valley View Road from H o w a r d L a n e t o Bittersweet Drive because of flooding of Purgatory Creek f r o m J u l y 2 4 t o July 31, 1987. Traffic control items for a lane shift on westbound Vall e y V i e w R o a d f r o m Fairway Drive to the connection point on existing Valley V i e w R o a d w e s t o f the Howard Lane intersection from June 17 to July 15 and J u n e 1 7 t o J u l y 2 2 , 1987. The construction of a berm was required to intercept the d r a i n a g e f r o m t h e Quail Ridge apartment and direct it away from Wall "E" and t o w a r d s t h e d r i - veway, from the apartment garage Lt. Station 65+00. The s w a l e c r e a t e d b y the berm was restored with "shingled" sod. Erosion control needed along the median barrier on the sou t h s i d e o f V a l l e y View Road at the Purgatory Creek x-ing Lt. Station 40+97 - 4 1 + 9 3 a n d a s ordered by the City Engineer. Disconnect and shut off a corporation stop 31-foot left st a t i o n 6 4 + 1 4 t h a t was installed by the City Water Department on October 14, 1 9 8 6 , t o p r o v i d e temporary water service to the Edenvale Clubhouse during t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f the Golf Cart Underpass. Installed a 16-inch butterfly valve on the Valley View Road w a t e r m a i n o n t h e east side of the railroad tracks prior to the jacking oper a t i o n s o a s t o minimize the time that Well No. 6 will be inoperative. item 10: ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT TOTAL PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMENDMENT ADDITIONS 11 SUBTOTAL TOTAL PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMENDMENT DEDUCTIONS SUBTOTAL TOTAL ADDITIONS CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 5 CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE $2,043,029.90 149,413.75 $2,192,443.65 $ 39,840.00 $2,152,603.65 $ 6,509.79 $2,159,113.44 CONTRACTOR Shafer Contracting Company, Inc. Yr\ Title Date Date alqpir ENGINEER Bennett-Ringrose-Wolsfeld-Jarvis-Gardner, Inc. gatZe %g? C;)—SeeZi2 Title 217- Date .2502 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE City Engineer Date ORDINANCE NO. 14-88 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDI N G CITY CODE SECTION 2.11, SUBD. 1, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE C I T Y CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 2.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THING S , CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS : Section 1. Eden Prairie City Code Section 2.11, Subd. 1, is hereby amended to read: Subd. 1. Establishment and Composition. A Board of Adjustments and Appeals, composed of ee.reft [nine (9)] members[,] is hereby established, for the purpose of handling a l l appeals and adjustments (variances) under provisions of the Ci t y Code relating to land use and subdivision, and as otherwise pro - vided by the City Code. Board members shall be appointed fo r three [(3)] year terms, except that such appointments may be mad e for less than three [(3)] year terms in order to achieve a syste m of staggered expiration of terms. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 15th day of March 19 8 8 , and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regu l a r meeting of the City Council of said City on the 5th day o f April , 1988. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the 1988. day of Rogers Cablesystems 801 Plymouth Avenue. Nth Mtnotta0olni, MN 55411 Si 21522 821)1) March 16, 1988 Ms. Joyce Provo City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Ms. Provo: RE: National Cable Month Proclamation The National Cable Television Association is promoting April as National Cable Month. More than 55 programs from 23 national cable networks will fill a 56-hour marathon kick-off weekend, April 1 and 2, on C-SPAN II, channel 31. The programming features a diversity of options for children, adults and family. In Minnesota, Governor Perpich has agreed to proclaim April as State Cable Month; cable companies statewide will be featuring special community outreach activities. In the Southwest, Rogers Cable TV is hosting our annual volunteer public access programming event, The Teddy Awards, on April 28, 1988 at our Eden Prairie studio. In addition, the company is planning community outreach activities, programs with the schools and, on a different note, a workshop for local TV dealers. I will be preparing a special report for public officials on the progress we have made with respect to customer services and retention. We would appreciate your support for cable month in the form of a city proclamation. Dottie Rietow has spoken to each of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commissioners and City Managers and there is support from each of the five cities. I have enclosed a suggested resolution for your review. Ms. Joyce Provo Page 2 March 16, 1988 I appreciate your follow-through on our request for a city proclamation. If at all possible, we would appreciate the scheduling of the proclamation on the agenda of your first April council meeting. If you have any questions, please call me at 522-5200, extension 214. Thank you for your attention to this detail. Warm regards, &t*,e( Debra S. Cottone Director, Public Affairs DSC:jws Enclosure CC: Ann Mathews Dottie Rietow SWSCC Members 88-0709. RESOLUTION NO. 88-57 PROCLAMATION BY MAYOR GARY PETERSON CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE WHEREAS, our community has been enriched by the wide variety of education, information and entertainment programs offered by the cable television medium, and WHEREAS, the full enjoyment of these benefits is made possible for the citizens of Eden Prairie through the services of Rogers Cable TV, and WHEREAS, the public access programming division of Rogers Cable TV is hosting the annual Teddy Awards, to honor community volunteers and producers on Thursday, April 28, 1988, beginning at 7:00 p.m., at the Eden Prairie studio, 10210 Crosstown Circle, Eden Prairie, and WHEREAS, Rogers Cable TV is hosting special community outreach events in April, and WHEREAS, the month of April has been designated nationally for recognition of the outstanding quality, quantity and diversity of cable's unique programming, THEREFORE, I, Gary Peterson, Mayor of the City of Eden Prairie, do hereby proclaim April as CABLE TELEVISION MONTH IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and cause the Official Seal of the City of Eden Prairie to be affixed the 1988. 88-0709. Jenkins Addition CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 60-87 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERT A I N L A N D F R O M O N E ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DES C R I P T I O N S O F L A N D IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 A N D S E C T I O N 1 1 . 9 9 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attache d h e r e t o a n d m a d e a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the R1-13.5 Distric t . Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included h e r e a f t e r i n t h e R1-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each Distric t r e f e r r e d t o i n City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, a n d a r e a m e n d e d accordingly. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and oefinitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for V i o l a t i o n " a n d Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby ad o p t e d i n t h e i r entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of April 5, 1988, entered into between John and Mary Jenkins, husband and wife, and the City of Eden P r a i r i e , w h i c h Agreement is hereby made a part hereof. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City o f E d e n Prairie on the 1st day of December, 1987, and finally read and ad o p t e d a n d o r d e r e d published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City o n t h e 5th day of April, 1988. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. eterson, Mayor 'HBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of r),0 Exhibit A ZONING & PLATTING That part of Government Lot 4, Section 22, Township 116, Range 22. Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the meander corner on the West line of Government Lot 5, of said Section 22, thence on an assumed bearing of North along said West line of Government Lot 5. to ' a point_ 143.8E feet North from the Southwest corner of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 22: thence North 71 degrees 55 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 609.40 feet: thence North 83 degrees 11 minutes 30 seconds East a' distance of 363.5 feet: thence Easterly 817.64 feet along a tangential curve concave to the South, said curve havinc a radius of 2020.00 feet and a central angle of 23 degrees 11 minutes 30 seconds, to the point of beginning of the land to be described: thence South 73 degrees 37 minutes 00 seconos East a distance of 280.32 feet; thence North 2 degrees 44 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 452.44 feet: thence North 76 degrees 35 minutes 50 seconds West a distance of 209.54 feet; thence South 76 degrees 38 minutes 10 seconds West a distance of 476.69 feet more or less to the West line of said Government Lot 4: thence Southerly along said West lin. of Government Lot 4 to the intersection with the above described curve; thence Southeasterly along s,,id curve to the point of beginning. Subject to a roadway easement over and across the South 33.00 feet thereof. Jenkins Addition DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1988, by John C. and Mary Jenkins, husband and wife, hereinafter referred to as "Developers," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developers have applied to City for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.61 acres and Preliminary Plat of 5.61 acres into two lots and one outlot for single family homes, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the property:" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #60-87, Developers covenant and agree to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: 1. Developers shall develop the property in conformance with the materials revised and dated September 30, 1987, reviewed and approved by the City Council on December 1, 1987, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. Developers shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein. 2. Developers covenant and agree to the performance and observance by Developers at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. Prior to release by the City of the final plat for the property, Developers agree to submit to the City Engineer, and to obtain the City Engineer's approval of, a legal description for a scenic easement to be located along the southern portion of the property, adjacent to Research Road, as depicted in Exhibit 8, attached hereto. Said easement shall not preclude utility services from being provided to the property from Research Road, through the 12'1 scenic easement area. Upon approval by the City Engineer of said legal description and of provisions for inclusion of utilities through the property, Developers shall submit to the City an executed scenic easement over that portion of the property as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said easement shall be depicted as a utility easement on the final plat documents for the property. Developers agree to file said easement on the property at Hennepin County and to provide proof of filing to the City prior to issuance by City of any permit for grading, or building, on the property. 4. Prior to release by the City of the final plat, Developers shall submit to the City, and obtain the City's approval of a cross-access agreement for access to Flesher Circle for Outlot A, Lot 1, and Lot 2, all in Block 1, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said cross-access shall be located over that portion of the property indicated as a "50-ft. roadway easement," generally over the existing driveway along the north boundary of the property, all as depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto. 5. Prior to release by the City of the final plat, Developers agree to execute a special assessment agreement with the City for purposes of public street and utility construction for extension of Research Road to service the property. 6. Concurrent with utility and street construction on the property, Developers agree to provide for connection to public sanitary sewer and watermain within Research Road to the existing house on Outlot A, Block 1, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Developers further agree that at such time as the existing private utilities fail for the existing house located on said Outlot A, Developers shall hook up to public utilities as provided above. 7. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property, Developers shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, and erosion control for the property. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developers shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 8. Developers shall notify the City and the Watershed District 48 hours prior to any grading, tree removal, or tree cutting on the property. 9. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning and receive the Director's approval of a tree inventory of those trees within 25 ft. outside of the construction area, which are not planned to be removed by construction on the property as approved by City, indicating the size, type, and location of all trees twelve (12) inches in diameter, or greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground level. 10. Developer agrees to implement erosion control measures and adequate protective measures for areas to be preserved and areas where grading is not to occur, and to receive City approval or said measures. Developer agrees that said protective measures shall include, but not be limited to: A. Grading shall be confined to that area of the property within the construction limits. B. Snow fencing shall be placed at the construction limits within the wooded areas of the property prior to any grading upon the property. C. City shall perform an on-site inspection of said protective measures on the property by the City. Developer shall contact City for said inspection. Developer agrees that defects in materials and workmanship in the implementation of said measures shall then be determined by the City. D. Defects in materials or workmanship, if any, shall be corrected by Developer. Developer agrees to call City for reinspection of the implementation measures, and to receive approval by the City prior to issuance of the grading permit by the City. Approval of materials and workmanship may be subject to such conditions as the City may impose at the time of acceptance. 11. If any such trees are removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction area, Developer agrees that prior to issuance of any building permit for the property, Developer shall: A. Submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of a reforestation plan for all trees removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction area. Said plan shall indicate that the trees shall be replaced by similar tree species and that the trees used for reforestation shall be no less than three inches in diameter. The amount of trees to be replaced shall be determined by the Director of Planning, using a square inch per square inch basis, according to the area of the circle created by a cross sectional cut through the diameter of a tree as measured 4.5 feet above the ground. B. Prepare and submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of a written estimate of the costs of the reforestation work to be completed. C. Submit a bond, or letter of credit, guaranteeing completion of all reforestation work as approved by the Director of Planning. Developer agrees that the amount of the bond, or letter of credit, shall be 150% of the approved estimated cost of implementation of all reforestation work and shall be in such form and contain such other provisions and terms as may be required by the Director of Planning. 511-J Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements listed ahovp in said plans, as approved by the Director of Planning. 12. Developers acknowledge that no occupancy permit for any structure on the property shall be released by the City until such time as all of the following conditions exist as minimum requirements: A. Research Road has been constructed to the point of base materials being in place and approved by the City. Developers may choose to construct Research Road adjacent to the property in order to provide access to the property as stated above. Developers agree that such construction shall be done according to plans and specifications approved by City and that such construction shall be completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. B. Sanitary sewer has been extended to the property via the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission interceptor and lateral systems to be constructed on the property are determined to be ready for individual sewer hook-ups by the City. Developers may also choose to construct the sanitary sewer trunk line to the property from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission interceptor, as discussed above. Developers agree that such construction shall be done according to plans and specifications approved by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and by the City, and that such construction shall be completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 54 Jenkins Addition CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-13 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE 60-87 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 60-87 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 5th day of April, 1988; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 60-87, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 60-87 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on April 5, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 54 Jenkins Addition CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 60-87 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located north of Research Road, south of Ridgewood West, from the Rural District to the R1-13.5 District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1988. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.) Creekview Addition CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIr HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 8-88-PUD-1-88 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 1-88- R1-13.5 District (hereinafter "PUD 1-88-R1-13.5"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of April 5, 1988, entered into between Bell Oaks Company, a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement") and that certain supplement to the Developer's Agreement, dated as of April 5, 1988, entered into between Eden River Bluffs Partnership and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Supplement"). The Developer's Agreement and Supplement contain the terms and conditions of PUD 1-88- R1-13.5, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD 1-88-R1-13.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD 1-88-R1-13.5 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code, that are contained in PUD 1-88-R1-13.5, are justified by the design or the development described therein. D. PUD 1-88-R1-13.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is, removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 1-88-R1-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and 1.; Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 19th day of January, 1988, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 5th day of April, 1988. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of EXHIBIT A PROPOSED REZONING-CREEKVIEW That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 116 North, Range 22 West of the northerly right-of-way line of River View Road and southerly of the folowing described line: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36; thence on an assumed bearing of South 88 degrees 35 minutes 07 seconds East, along the North line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 750.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 63 degrees 34 minutes 49 seconds East a distance of 337.73 feet; thence North 88 degrees 34 minutes 13 seconds East a distance of 181.15 feet; thence South 88 degrees 35 minutes 07 seconds East a distance of 72.82 feet; thence South 56 degrees 25 minutes 26 seconds East a distance of 426.22 feet; thence 78 degrees 35 minutes 41 seconds East a distance of 353.99 feet; thence South 65 degrees 11 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 219.24 feet; thence South 51 degrees 43 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 319.70 feet; thence South 15 degrees 03 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 300.31 feet thence South 23 degrees 58 minutes 14 seconds East a distance of 196.03 feet, more or less, to the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36 and said line there terminating. The above described property contains 49.57 Acres. March 28, 1988 Creekview Addition (AKA Bell Oaks) DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1988, by Bell Oaks Company, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept on 78.22 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Change, with variances, on 60.15 acres, Preliminary Plat of 78.22 acres into 87 single family lots and three outlots, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #8-88-PUD-1- 88, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: 1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the materials revised and dated January 18, 1988, reviewed and approved by the City Council on January 19, 1988, and attached hereto as Cxhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein. 2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. Concurrent with, and as part of the final plat, Developer agrees to provide for easements in the following locations for the purpose(s) indicated: 1:q-1 A. Across Outlot C, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, a utility easement shall be depicted on the final plat, with a scenic easement as depicted in Exhibit 0, attached hereto, executed over said outlot for protection of the natural features. B. Across the rear yards of Lots 12, 13, 15, and 16, Block 2 and Lots 7-9, 15-20, 23-25, and 27-32, Block 4, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, a utility and drainage easement shall be depicted on the final plat, with a scenic easement as depicted in Exhibit D, attached hereto, executed over that portion of said lots for protection of the natural features. C. Across that portion of the property within the "proposed" Conservancy Area of Purgatory Creek, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, a scenic easement, said easement to be in the form as depicted in Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. D. Across the storm water holding ponds located on the property, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, a drainage and utility easement shall be depicted on the final plat. 4. Developer agrees to submit to the City Engineer, and to obtain the City Engineer's approval of detailed plans for construction of streets, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermain, sidewalks, trails, and erosion control for the property. Said plans shall include, but not be limited to at least the following: A. Detailed plans for the design and construction of the storm water drainage on the property, to include details regarding: 1) The storm water holding pond located in the southeast portion of the property. 2) Access down the bluff for storm sewer, to be located in an appropriate area as agreed upon by the Watershed District, City and Developer for purposes of protection of the bluff environment. Access shall be limited in an effort to minimize the damage to the bluff and the trees on the property. B. Detailed plans for erosion control on the property, which shall include details of erosion control on Lots 15 - 19, Block 2, and Lots 3 - 7 and 16 - 32, Block 4. Said plans shall include details regarding restoration of the property, including a management system for the timing of restoration of individual lots. C. Detailed plans for sanitary sewer sevice to the property, including, but not limited to: 1) Design and construction of a lift station for the sanitary sewer system to service the property; Z) Design and construction of said sanitary sewer service so as to eliminate the need for the existing temporary lift station in Bluffs West 6th Addition; and, 3) Prior to issuance of any building permit on the property, design and construction plans for the forcemain to serve Lots 17 and 18, Block 2, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. D. Detailed plans for construction of a watermain system for the property, including extension of an eight-inch (8") watermain north across Purgatory Creek. City will be responsible for costs of the watermain construction costs over and above the average watermain cost in the subdivision for extension of said watermain through Outlot C, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. E. Detailed plans for a five-foot wide, five-inch thick concrete sidewalk along the eastern-most side of Lot 1, Block 2, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, for purposes of connecting the trail along Riverview Road to the sidewalk along the private road located northeasterly thereof. F. Detailed plans for the design and construction of the private road to be constructed within Outlot B, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said private road plans shall include the following details: 1) 18-ft. wide bituminous surface measured from the back of curbing to the opposite back of curbing. 2) A five-foot wide, five-inch thick concrete sidewalk along the north and west sides of said private road for purposes of accessing the public park property at the northeasterly terminus of said private road. 3) A restricted vehicular access at the northeasterly terminus of the private road for purposes of City maintenance vehicle access for maintenance of the park facility(ies) to be located within Outlot C, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. 4) Grading of said private road shall include grading and restoration plans to the bottom of the slope (to the northeast) for purposes of the trail to be extended into Outlot C as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, in order to allow for public access to said outlot and to immediately inform future residents of the property of the existence of said park access. The design of all the improvements listed above shall meet the City standards and specifications and said improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 5. Receipt of petition for improvements to Riverview Road to inc l u d e s t r e e t s , utilities, and and eight-foot (8') wide bituminous trail alo n g t h e n o r t h side of Riverview Road. 6. Developer acknowledges benefit to be derived by the prope r t y f r o m t h e improvements listed above to Riveeview Road, i.e. streets, u t i l i t i e s , a n d trail improvements, and, therefore, agrees to execute a Speci a l A s s e s s m e n t Agreement for said improvements 7. Phasing plan to City depicting the number of lots in each phas e , a m o u n t o f grading to be accomplished with each phase, streets and util i t i e s t o b e constructed with each phase, and restoration plans. 8. Prior to release by the City of any building permit for th e p r o p e r t y , Developer agrees to pay for the costs of construction of the te m p o r a r y l i f t station for sanitary sewer service to the property. In additio n , D e v e l o p e r agrees to prepay to the City the estimated operation and mainte n a n c e c o s t s for the temporary lift station on the property as discussed in i t e m # 2 . C . 2 ) above. The amount of the advance payment shall be determined b y t h e C i t y Engineer, based on an annual estimate of the operation and maint e n a n c e c o s t s for said station, multiplied times the estimated number of y e a r s s a i d temporary lift station is expected to remain in service to the pro p e r t y . The City, in its sole discretion, may agree that the lift s t a t i o n b e constructed as a permanent facility. In that event, the City Eng i n e e r s h a l l determine the total life maintenance costs for the station and th e D e v e l o p e r agrees to be responsible all said costs. City shall give cre d i t t o t h e Developer for cost savings to the City due to the insta l l a t i o n o f a permanent lift station, versus installation a temporary lift st a t i o n . 9. Developer agrees to notify the City and the Watershed Distric t a t l e a s t 4 8 hours in advance of any grading, or tree removal, on the propert y . 10. Prior to issuance of any grading permit upon the property, Dev e l o p e r a g r e e s as follows: For Lots 15 - 19, Block 2, and Lots 3 - 7 and 16 - 32, Block 4 , g e n e r a l l y located along the Purgatory Creek ridge, as depicted in Exhibi t B , a t t a c h e d hereto, grading shall not be required as a part of the mass gr a d i n g o f t h e property, but will be allowed to proceed on a lot-by-lot b a s i s w i t h individual construction according to the overall approved gradin g p l a n . Trees existing un these lots which are not removed as a part o f t h e m a s s grading shall be included for purposes of bonding and gu a r a n t e e o f replacement until such time as the buildings are completed and a n a c c u r a t e count of the number and conditions of trees is made by the City . T h e t o t a l of all trees removed within the construction limits will then b e u s e d t o determine the final replacement amount as discussed in item # 1 2 , b e l o w . This determination will made by the City. 11. Developer agrees to implement erosion control measures and adequate protective measures for areas to be preserved and areas where gra d i n g i s n o t to occur, and to obtain City approval of said measures. Devel o p e r a g r e e s that said protective measures shall include, but not be limited to : 2 A. Grading shall be confined to that area of the property within the construction limits. B. Snow fencing shall be placed at the construction limits within the wooded areas of the property, as determined to be necessary by the Director of Planning, prior to any grading upon the property. C. City shall perform an on-site inspection of said protective measures on the property by the City. Developer shall contact City for said inspection. Developer agrees that defects in materials and workmanship in the implementation of said measures shall then be determined by the City. D. Defects in materials or workmanship, if any, shall be corrected by Developer. Developer agrees to call City for reinspection of the implementation measures, and to obtain approval by the City prior to issuance of the grading permit by the City. Approval of materials and workmanship may be subject to such conditions as the City may impose at the time of acceptance. 12. Erosion control on the property shall be the responsibility of both the Developer and subsequent builders and/or owners of the property. Restoration of individual lots shall take place, weather permitting, immediately upon completion of construction of structures, but in no case shall said restoration be delayed more than six (6) months past the point of final inspection of the structures on the lot by the City Building Department. Restoration of the creek lots shall consist of sod on slopes greater than 3 to I staked properly on the slope, or an equal seeding and fiber blanket method approved by the City. Erosion control in the construction limits shall not be removed from any lot until restoration has been completed on all adjacent lots and in no case shall erosion control be removed if drainage from restored lots flows toward the portion of the erosion control barrier which is proposed to be removed. 13. In order preserve significant trees on the property, Developer agrees as follows: A. Prior to issuance of any grading permit upon the property, Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and obtain the Director's approval of, a tree replacement plan for 1,143 caliper inches of trees which are planned to be removed from the property due to construction on said property as approved by City. Developer agrees to submit to the Director of Planning, and to obtain the Director's approval of bonding for the work to be completed as part of the tree replacement plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit E, Tree Replacement Policy, attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. Developer also agrees to submit to the Director of Planning and obtain the Director's approval of a tree inventory of those trees within and 25 ft. outside of the construction area, which are not planned to be removed by construction on the property as approved by City, indicating the size, type, and location of all trees twelve (12) inches in diameter, or greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground level. C. If any such trees not planned for removal by City-approved construction are removed, damaged, or destroyed,outside of the construction area, Developer agrees that prior to issuance of any building permit for the property, Developer shall: 1) Submit to the Director of Planning, and obtain the Director's approval of a reforestation plan for all trees removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction area. Said plan shall indicate that the trees shall be replaced by similar tree species and that the trees used for reforestation shall be no less than three inches (3") in diameter. The amount of trees to be replaced shall be determined by the Director of Planning, using a square inch per square inch basis, according to the area of the circle created by a cross sectional cut through the diameter of a tree as measured 4.5 feet above the ground. 2) Prepare and submit to the Director of Planning, and obtain the Director's approval of a written estimate of the costs of the reforestation work to be completed. 3) Submit a bond, or letter of credit, guaranteeing completion of all reforestation work as approved by the Director of Planning. Developer agrees that the amount of the bond, or letter of credit, shall be 150% of the approved estimated cost of implementation of all reforestation work and shall be in such form and contain such other provisions and terms as may be required by the Director of Planning. Developer agrees that the term of said bond, or letter of credit, shall be for one (1) full growing season after the first inspection by City, if said reforestation is found by City to be in compliance with this Agreement and City Code requirements. Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the Director of Planning. 14. Prior to issuance of any individual building permit for any of the Lots 15 - 19, Block 2, or for Lots 3 - 7 and 16 - 32, Block 4, Developer agrees to submit to the Director of Planning and to obtain the Director's approval of plans which indicate at least the following information for said lots: proposed building location(s), detailed grading, trees proposed to be removed, and any other pertinent site data. Plans determined by the Director to be inconsistent with the approved grading plan attached hereto as part of Exhibit B shall require review by the City Council prior to issuance of any individual building permit. 15. The following items shall be maintained by the Developer and/or future owners of the property, and shall not be maintained by the City: A. The storm water holding ponds on the property, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, including routine maintenance, such as debris pick-up, grass and weed cutting, etc. (City shall maintain the hydraulic properties of said holding pond.) B. The grinder pump and the sanitary sewer force main provided for Lots 17 and 18, Block 2, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. C. The private road to be installed within Outlot B, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. 16. As part of the Planned Unit Development #1-88, City hereby grants the following variances to the requirements of Chapter 11: A. Lot width at street frontage from 85 ft., as required, to: 80 ft. for Lot 12, Block 3 65 ft. for Lot 28, Block 4 B. Lot width at street frontage on a cul-de-sac from 55 ft., as required to: 50 ft. for Lot 16, Block 4 38 ft. for Lot 19, Block 4 20 ft. for Lot 20, Block 4 50 ft. for Lot 23, Block 4 20 ft. for Lot 25, Block 4 50 ft. for Lot 21, Block 4 50 ft. for Lot 32, Block 4 C. No frontage on a publicly dedicated street for Lots 17 and 18, Block 4. D. Minimum lot size of less than ten acres in a Rural Zoning District, to allow lot size of 3.62 acres for Outlot A. Creekview Addition CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-41 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE 8-88-PUD-1-88 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 8-88-PUD-1-88 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 5th day of April, 1988; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 8-88-PUD-1-88, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 8-88-PUD-1-88 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on April 5, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk r)3-11 Creekview Addition CITY OF rnrN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 8-88-PUD-1-88 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located north of Riverview Road, southwest of Purgatory Creek, and south of Bluffs East 4th Addition from the Rural District to the PUD-1-88-R1-13.5 District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1988. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.) 565' -MEMORANDUM- TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THRUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Alan D. Gray, City Engineer FROM: Jefferey Johnson, Engineering Technician DATE: March 29, 1988 SUBJECT: Grading Permit Application 88-07, 16201 Pioneer Trail Mr. Scott Brau, owner of property located at 16201 Pioneer Trail, has requested approval for grading at the above address. The request consists of construction of two retaining walls approximately four feet in height or less and the corresponding filling in on the back side of the retaining walls with earth materials. (Please refer to attached plan). The intent is to provide for a flatter, more usable, side and rear yard areas for the property owner. Applicant estimates that approximately 600 - 700 cubic yards of material will be necessary to complete his grading. Existing drainage patterns will not be significantly altered with this grading permit. Erosion control measures will be installed prior to issuance of grading permit. Recommend approval of grading permit for Mr. Scott Brau subject to installation of acceptable erosion control, receipt of applicable fees, and appropriate bond. JJ:ss MEMORANDUM TO; THROUGH: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Mayor and City Council City Manager Carl J. Jullie Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson Roof Repair at 8950 Eden Prairie Road March 30, 1988 The roof at the old City Hall has had a history of leaks. A few years ago the roof was substantially repaired. Leaks still occurred and the manufacturer, GAF Industries, has paid for numerous calls for repairs covered by warranty. GAF has informed the City that it has done all the types of repairs it can do, and believes that the source of the problem is the City's responsibility. Screening for rooftop mechanical equipment is made of wood, and these timbers have rotted. They are likely the conduit for water to travel through the roofing membrane. If the City were to make the repairs and leaking still occurred, then GAF could be made to replace its roof work at its own cost (estimated to be $20,000). Plans for the repair work were drawn by Cluts O'Brien Strother Architects. The low quote for the work was submitted by AWR Inc. for an amount totalling $3,571.00. This quote appears to be reasonable. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council authorize the Mayor and Ci757 Manager to execute an agreement with AWR Inc. in the amount of $3,571.00 for mechanical screening repair at 8950 Eden Prairie Road. Funds would come from the General Fund reserve. CWD:bmm 667 MEMORANDUM 10: THROUGH: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Mayor and City Council City Manager Carl J. Jullie Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson Radios and Police Parking lot March 30, 1988 Two matters have surfaced which should be addressed relatively soon. One - the City's radio system - is an opportunity to realize long term cost-saving and better system reliability. The second - surfacing a parking lot - is a more immediate concern. Radio Equipment: The City's system of remote radio controllers and repeaters h—a----several units which are interconnected on leased telephone lines. While this system was the most economical at the time of original installation, it is now increasingly expensive and less reliable compared to technology which is now readily available. The City's current system is maintained on a time-and- materials basis (which is less expensive than a maintenance contract in this case). Maintenance expenses ran $2600 in 1987, and a similar amount is budgeted for 1988 in the Public Works Equipment Maintenance activity. Quotes have been received from two firms for the City to purchase and have installed its own new, updated equipment. The low quote was submitted by Contract Mobile Communications of Eden Prairie in the amount of $4269.00. This cost will likely be lower than the operating costs of the City's current system over the next two years. Police Parking . Lot: After removal of the so-called "Schultz House" immediately south of the —1561ice Station last year, land was available for parking to relieve the overcrowded parking lot around the station. City forces placed a gravel surface on the parking lot which proved to work well in the winter. With the spring thaw, however, the surface has proven to be woefully inadequate. Several staff members personal vehicles have been stuck up to their axles in mud and required towing service. People have been mired in the mud as well. The City's public works stall could improve the base and place an asphalt surface for about $5000 to $7000. Financin : Funds remain in the City Services Construction Fund, which was es a is ed in the early 1980s with proceeds from the sale of bonds for the police, public works, and parks maintenance buildings. The balance in this fund is sufficient to cover the $8,000 to $10,000 or so not included in the 1988 budget to make these improvements. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council authorize the proposed improvpmentTh the radio system and police parking lot with the use of funds available from the City Services Construction Fund. CWD:bmm MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: City Manager Carl J. Jullie FROM: Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson SUBJECT: Change Order No. 2, Fire Stations Contract DATE: March 31, 1988 Watson-Forsberg, Inc. has requested approval of Cha n g e O r d e r N o . 2 i n t h e amount of $15,301.89 for the contract to construct an d r e m o d e l F i r e S t a t i o n s No. 3 and 4. Most of the $19,412.89 in additions reques t e d s t e m s f r o m t h e n e e d to reconfigure an exit corridor in Fire Station No. 3 a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e S t a t e Building Code Division after the construction contr a c t h a d b e e n a w a r d e d . Another major item is upgrading lintel work around t h e f i r e b a y d o o r s o n Station No. 4 in order to reduce long-term maintenanc e c o s t s . O t h e r c h a n g e s are minor in-field revisions. The change order reques t a l s o h a s a d e d u c t o f $4,111 for a retaining wall around the base of the NSP t r a n s m i s s i o n p o l e . ( N S P has insisted on a different design and asked that the C i t y a s s u m e t h e $ 7 , 5 0 0 cost; staff is negotiating for a lower City financial com m i t m e n t . ) To recap the contract status to date: Original Contract: Change Order No.1: Change Order No.2: $1,353,450.00 2,102.00 $1,355,552.00 15,301.89 $1,370,853.89 The change orders are within the $37,000 contingency a v a i l a b l e f o r t h e f i r e station improvements. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve Change Order N o . 2 i n the amount of $15,301.89 for the fire stations contra c t w i t h W a t s o n - F o r s b e r g , Inc. CWD:bmm CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-43 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE WOODDALE CHURCH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT TO THE OVERALL WOODDALE CHURCH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PhD) of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the Wooddale Church development is considered a proper amendment to the overall Wooddale Church Planned Unit Development Concept; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the request of Wooddale Church for PUD Concept Amendment approval to the overall Wooddale Church Planned Unit Development Concept for the Wooddale Church development and recommended approval of the PhD Concept Amendment to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on April 5, 1988; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as fqllows: 1. The Wooddale Church development PhD Concept Amendment, being in 'Hennepin County, Minnesota, and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PhD Concept Amendment approval to the overall Wooddale Church Planned Unit Development Concept as outlined in the application materials for Wooddale Church. 3. That the PhD Concept Amendment meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated April 4, 1988. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 5th day of April, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 660 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-44 A RESOLUTION FINDING THE AMENDED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR WOODDALE CHURCH, A PRIVATE ACTION, DOES NOT REQUIRE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of Eden Prairie did hold a hearing on April 5, 1988, to consider Wooddale Church proposal of Wooddale Church; and, WHEREAS, said development is located on approximately 31 acres of land located at the southwest corner Shady Oak Road and Bryant Lake Drive, in Eden Prairie; and, WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on the Wooddale Church proposal of Wooddale Church and did recommend approval of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet finding the project of no significant impact; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, that an Environmental Impact Statement is not necessary for the Wooddale Church proposal of Wooddale Church, because the project is not a major action, does not have significant environmental effects, and is not of more than local significance. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a Negative Declaration Notice shall be officially filed with the Minnesota Environmental Quality Council. ADOPTED this 5th day of April, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Chris Enger, Director of Planning Carl J. Jullie, City Manager August 14, 1987 Wooddale Church Representatives of Wooddale Church have approached the City Staff with a proposal for increasing the ultimate size of Wooddale's facility. Wooddale owns 31 acres of land, upon which they have constructed Phases I and II of a church facility approved by the City in 1981. Wooddale was successful in changing the Comprehensive Guide Plan from Low Density Residential to Church at that time based upon the appeal of the campus-type use as a transition between Highway #169 and existing single family residential uses to the west (the Golden Ridge neighborhood). The 1981 approval was based upon a Phase I building of 50,000 sq. ft., with an ultimate size of 100,000 sq. ft., including an 1,800 seat sanctuary. The building was to have been a relatively low profile with a sanctuary of 60 ft. in height and a bell tower for image of 75 ft. in height. Both of these heights were backdropped by a wooded hill. City Code maximum is 30 ft. for the building and 55 ft. for the tower. The parking proposed at that time was 470 spaces for Phase I and 1,100 spaces ultimately. Planners for Wooddale informed us that they are prepared to start working drawings today for construction next Spring of a 220,000 sq. ft. (total) facility requiring 2,256 parking spaces, parking ramps, and a sanctuary topped by a belfry and spire of approximately 200 ft. (Colonial Church of Edina has a bell tower of about 110 ft.) In 1984, the Planning Commission recommended denial of a request to place a facility about the size of the approved Wooddale Church on a site just south of Wooddale on Bryant Lake Drive. The Commission found that two churches of a regional size generated traffic at the same times which overloaded intersections. The proponent withdrew that request. The current Wooddale request is roughly the equivalent of doubling the approved size, or would be the same as having approved the Cathedral of Praise request. City Staff has identified the following items for Wooddale as being appropriate for review of their current request: 1) Preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet 2) Preparation of a traffic study, commissioned by the City, paid for by Wooddale 3) Preparation of documentation for the Pollution Control Agency of materials necessary for an Indirect Source Permit 4) Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment 5) Zoning Amendment for Phase III of the development 6) Parking study to determine actual parking requirements beyond City Code requirements 7) Neighborhood meeting to review increased parking, parking decks, and a 200 ft. high structure compared to a 75 ft. high structure as currently approved Review of the current request is very much a policy issue. Is a landmark of this scale appropriate in this location? Do the characteristics of the proposal which were originally persuasive to the City in amending the Comprehensive Guide Plan from Low Density Residential to Church still exist in the new proposal? Is there any maximum height on any buildings in Eden Prairie? Are the concerns about traffic that were critical in the decision on Cathedral of Praise Chruch still valid today? All of these questions will require Council determination, and it would be helpful if you would contact Mr. Jullie, or myself, if you have any thoughts on. these issues, so that they may be incorporated early on in the review process. PROPOSED SITE AREA LOCATION MAP STAFF REPORT Planning Connission Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning March 25, 1988 Wooddale Church Expansion Southwest corner of Shady Oak Road and Bryant Lake Drive Wooddale Church 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on approximately 31 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 31 acres with a variance for building height from 30 to 75 feet and a variance for spire height from 25 to 125 feet. 3. Zoning District Amendment within an existing zoned Public district. TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: PROJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: REQUEST: 4. Review Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for construction of a new parking facility for 1,000 or more vehicles. Background This project is a continued item from the February 22, 1988, Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission made a motion to return the development plans to the proponent for revisions as identified in the Staff Report, to change the parking plan to save additional trees on the site and revise the parking phasing plan to resolve the parking demand/provision issue so that parking problems would not occur in the future. Wooddale Church Expansion 2 March 25, 1988 Master Pl.. ch u 1. Provide parking ramps concurrent with building construction. The church has agreed to return to the Planning Commission subsequent to any future development beyond Phase III to review building expansion plans and parking demands and need for parking ramps. 2. Revise the site plan to provide an internal circulation with provision of a 28-foot wide protected lane and revise all driveways to a 28-foot wide standard. Provide two lanes of access out of the site and one lane access in to the site at all driveways. The master plan has been revised to comply with these requirements. 3. Modify the site plan to retain the tree mass of poplar and elm vegetation along Bryant Lane and provide additional parking within parking decks with additional levels over Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III. The church has agreed not to grade the parking area adjacent to Bryant Lane until such time that parking would be needed in the future with subsequent phases. The master plan depicts a 70 to 80-foot permanent future buffer strip. City Code would require a 50-foot setback to parking along Bryant Lane. 50 feet of this area would be retained in its natural state, preserving the poplar and elm trees. The front 20 to 30 feet of the proposed setback would be used for reforestation to introduce new and more desirable species such as maple and birch. As a point of clarification, it was initially stated in the EAW that 12 acres of trees would be lost due to the construction. The 12 acres referred to in the EAW incudes grass areas, and trees on the property. The actual amount of elm and poplar trees is 4.8 acres and with this proposal, approximately, 1.3 acres would be retained. 4. Modify the landscape plan to provide additional and larger shade and coniferous trees to provide a better visual transition to adjoining residential properties and downplay the physical mass and height of the building on adjoining properties and public roads. Some large spruce trees have been planted along the north side of the building; however, it is not adequate to offset the building mass. There are existing green areas on the west side of the building where larger trees could be planted to buffer the single family homes to the northwest of the site. 5. Provide required storm water run-off calculations and ponding requirements for review by the City Engineer. This has not been completed at this time and should be completed prior to City Council review. 6. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review. This has not been provided at this time, and should be provided prior to Council review. Wooddale Church Expansion 3 March 25, 1988 7. Provide information which demonstrates that building materials are in compliance with the exterior building material requirements of City Code. This has not been completed at this time and should be provided prior to Council review. Building Height Variance The church is requesting that the Planning Commission act on a variance request from 30 to 75 feet for the sanctuary and from 25 to 125 feet for the spire through the PUD. The variance, if granted, would be for the second tallest structure in the community outside of the radio towers along Valley View Road. Since the church has indicated to Staff that the spire would not be constructed until a subsequent phase, the Planning Cortmission has an alternative to considering the height variance to 200 feet at this time. Since the church also will not be constructing parking lot B along Bryant Lane at this time, one option the Planning Commission may choose is to recommend approval of the variance height to 75 feet for the sanctuary only. Prior to any future construction, the church would then be required to appear before the Planning Comnission to request the height variance for the spire. If it was determined at that time that the tree mass was not necessary to offset the building height of the church or the steeple, then a height variance for the spire could be granted and the church could also proceed with the construction of the parking area along Bryant Law. If, on the other hand, the Planning Conmission felt the tree mass was still necessary to offset the mass and the building height, the variance for the spire height could be granted and the church would be required to provide a different parking plan with parking provided an additional decking over parking deck A and/or over existing parking along Shady Oak Road. Conclusi ons The Planning Conmission has two options with regards to the height variance. 1. Recommend approval of the height variance to 200 feet at this time, based upon the revised plans. 2. Recortmend approval of the height variance to 75 feet for the sanctuary and review the height request for the steeple at a later time. Alternatives I. If the Planning Connission finds that the PUD Amendment is acceptable and represents the best use for this site and the site plan is appropriate for the property, and the variances are unique, then approval of the project should be based on revised plans dated March 24, 1988, Staff Reports, dated February 19, 1988, and March 25, 1988, and based upon the following conditions: A. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: 1. Provide information which demonstrates that the building materials are in compliance with the exterior building material requirements with the City Code. Wooddale Church Expansion 4 March 25, 19 2. Provide additional la ndscaping, additional and larger coniferous and shale trees to provide a better visual transition to the adjoining residential properties to the west. 3. Submit samples of the exterior building materials for review. B. Provide the required storm water run-off calculations and ponding requirements for review by the City Engineer. C. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall: 1. Stake the proposed construction limits with a snow fence and stake and place the erosion control fencing as required by the City Engineer and the Watershed District. 2. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. 3. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review. D. Prior to Grading permit issuance, proponent shall: 1. Provide detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. 2. Provide detailed storm water run-off, erosion control, and utility plans for review by the City Engineer. If the Plaming Commission finds that the site plan is not acceptable or the project is too intense in terms of the site usage that the physical mass of the ciurch height cannot be mitigated nor is a substantial arguement been made for creating a unique situation for building height at 200 feet, then the Commission may choose to recommend denial of the request as submitted. AREA LOCATION MAP STAFF REPORT Planning Comm; ; ,uu Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning February 19, 1988 Wooddale Church Expansion Wooddale Church 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on approximately 31 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 31 acres with a variance for building height from 30 to 75 feet and a variance for spire height from 25 to 125 feet. 3. Zoning District Amendment within an existing zoned Public District. 4. Review of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for construction of a new parking facility for 1,000 or more vehicles. TO: FROM: WO-UGH: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: REQUEST: Background This site is currently depicted as church on the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The surrounding land uses are guided Office to the north and east of the site, Low Density Residential to the south and Open Space and Low Density Residential to the west of the property. The site is currently zoned public. Phase I and Phase II of the church are currently built on this property. Comprehensive Guide Plan The original request of the Wooddale Church in 1981 included a Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Public. At that time, the surrounding land uses were guided Low Density Residential, Open Space, or Medium Wooddale Church Expansion 2 February 19, 1988 Density Residential. The Guide Plan was changed to Public because of the l o w i m p a c t nature of the building program on-site, the saving of trees, low profile o n e - s t o r y building architecture, and minimal traffic impacts. Since the change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan to Public for the chu r c h s i t e , there have been several other Guide Plan Changes in the area from Resid e n t i a l t o Office or Commercial. The Marquette Bank building just to the east of the s i t e w a s changed from Low Density Residential to Office. The 80-acre City West pr o j e c t w a s changed from Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential to a m i x e d l a n d use which included mostly Office, some Commercial, and some Mediu m D e n s i t y Residential. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment The 1981 Planned Unit Development depicted a capacity plan of 100,000 squar e f e e t o f building at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.07. The maximum height approve d w a s 6 0 feet for the sanctuary and 75 feet for a separate landmark or church ident i f i c a t i o n sign. Parking was proposed for 1,140 spaces. The size of the sanctua r y w o u l d accommodate 1,800 seats. The 1988 plan depicts a capacity plan of 166,70 0 s q u a r e feet at a Floor Area Ratio of 0.12. The proposed maximum height would be 75 f e e t t o the top of the sanctuary and 200 feet to the top of the spire. Parking pro p o s e d i s 2,250 spaces which requires an EAW to be prepared and reviewed and an I n d i r e c t Source Permit from the Pollution Control Agency (PCA). The size of the sa n c t u a r y would be 2,000 seats. The 1981 plan depicted a total of 3.7 acres of woods, primarily oaks , t o b e preserved. The 1988 plan depicts 2.6 acres of woods, primarily oaks , t o b e preserved. Zoning Requirements for the Public Zoning District The building and parking areas meet the minimum setback requirements for the P u b l i c zoning district. The number of parking spaces required for a church is b a s e d u p o n a ratio of one parking space for every three seats contained within the s a n c t u a r y . Since a total of 2,000 seats are proposed, 667 parking spaces must be pr o v i d e d o n - site. The ultimate development plan for the property proposes 2,250 parki n g s p a c e s , which the church believes, due to their experience, is necessary to provid e a d e q u a t e parking for church service, Sunday school, and other activities. The Pub l i c z o n i n g district does not have a maximum (FAR); however, a 0.12 FAR is low in com p a r i s o n t o other office developments in the area which include the Marquette Bank b u i l d i n g a t 0.41 FAR, the O'Neill Office building at 0.41 FAR, and the Wilson Learnin g b u i l d i n g at a 0.50 FAR. The maximum height in the Public zoning district is 30 fe e t f o r t h e main structure with a spire not exceed 25 feet above the maximum structu r e h e i g h t permitted of 30 feet. The church is requesting a variance from 30 feet t o 7 5 f e e t for the main structure and from 25 to 125 feet for the spire. Height Variance The church and spire will be a combined height of 200 feet or at an ele v a t i o n o f 1,081. This compares with a height of oak trees and the hill on-site at e l e v a t i o n 968, the homes in the Golden Ridge Estate at elevation 950, the Wilson L e a r n i n g building at elevation 1,032, the Vantage II at elevation 1,000 feet, a n d t h e Marquette Bank building at elevation 962. Since the proponents are requ e s t i n g a variance through the Planned Unit Development Review process, the P l a n n i n g Cormission and City Council must act on the variance request. q09 Wooddale Church Expansion 3 February 19, 1988 There are pros and cons to a height variance request of this nature. Pro Side: 1. The church sanctuary is 75 feet in height and the rem a i n i n g 1 2 5 f e e t c o u l d be considered as a religious symbol. 2. The spire, at 125 feet, is narrow and not as obtrusive t h a n i f t h e s a n c t u a r y was constructed to a 200-foot height. 3. Natural features such as the hill and woods can off-s e t t h e h e i g h t o f t h e building. 4. The setback between the church structure and Shady Oak R o a d i s a p p r o x i m a t e l y 800 feet and the setback between the church and Brya n t L a n e i s a b o u t 5 0 0 feet. Setbacks over and above the Ordinance requiremen t o f 5 0 f e e t m a y h e l p visually reduce the height of the structure. 5. This church is on a freeway, setting is aside from a p o t e n t i a l r e q u e s t i n the center of a residential area. Con Side: 1. The church could be considered as a regional use beca u s e o f i t s s i z e a n d membership and may be more appropriate within the Maj o r C e n t e r A r e a w h e r e taller and larger buildings are anticipated. 2. The building height would be approximately 130 feet ta l l e r t h a n t h e r i d g e line on Golden Ridge Estates and could impact these home s v i s u a l l y . 3. The scale of the church is approximately 1 2/3 the si z e o f t h e o r i g i n a l proposal and may not be appropriate as neighbor to the a d j o i n i n g r e s i d e n t i a l properties. The building design program has changed di r e c t i o n f r o m t h e l o w profile which was the original basis for approval. 4. The granting of the variance may establish a height pr e c e d e n t a n d o p e n t h e door for requests from other developers for taller struct u r e s o u t s i d e o f t h e MCA. 5. The granting of the height variance may set a preceden t f o r c h u r c h e s ( w o u l d a church of this size and height be appropriate in t h e m i d d l e o f a l o w density residential neighborhood?). Traffic The City commissioned Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch, consulting t r a f f i c e n g i n e e r s , t o p r e p a r e a detailed traffic study for the Wooddale Church to a n a l y z e t h e i m p a c t s u p o n t h e adjoining roadways and intersections. Following is a s u m m a r y o f t h e s t u d y : 1. On Sunday mornings, at the Shady Oak Road/Bryant La n e i n t e r s e c t i o n , t h e level of service is C. The State Highway Department i n d i c a t e s a l e v e l o f service D as a design standard for intersections. Wooddale Church Expansion 4 February 19, 1988 2. Previous traffic studies done by BIN, iii Lunjunction with Hennepin County, talk about ultimate improvements to Shady Oak Road including a widening to four through-lanes with left turn and right turn lanes and traffic signals at the Shady Oak Road intersections with Bryant Lane, City West Parkway, and Highway #169. This study indicates that by the year 2000 these roadway improvements should be in place. 3. If in the year 2000, that the church capacity would double and with all the improvements above in place for Shady Oak Road, the intersection at Bryant Lane and Shady Oak Road would still operate at a level of service C, and no improvements should be needed as a result of church expansion on Bryant Lane to the south. 4. Currently the Wooddale Church does not contribute in any signficant way to any weekday afternoon peak hour congestion. As a worse case scenario, if Sunday church volumes occur during the weekday peak hour, the level of service would be well beyond F at the adjacent intersections. 5. The church has indicated that the maximum amount of people in attendance at the church would be between 250 to 300 people arriving or departing during the time period of 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. during the week. This would contribute approximately 3% more traffic to the adjacent roads and intersections but would not change the level of service C during the current peak hour on Shady Oak Road. 6. The number of parking spaces proposed at 2,250 are high compared to conventional parking determination standards; however, the parking is provided according to the church's need. 7. The internal circulation can be improved by providing a 28-foot wide loop road on which parking is not permitted. 8. The site plan needs to be modified to indicate how access is provided to each of the parking ramps. 9. Al three church driveways need to be designed to provide two exit lanes to reduce delay and increase stacking distance. 10. If a median is constructed by Hennepin County as part of improving Shady Oak Road, a full median npening would be needed at the ncrthwest church driveway. Failure to provide such an opening will place the Bryant Lake Drive/City West Parkway intersection over capacity during the Sunday morning peak. Hennepin County has indicated that a final decision has not been made about where median openings would be allowed and that they would be reviewed and studied before making a final decision. Phasina Plan The church has a six-step phasing plan programed out to the year 2005. Phase III construction contemplated in the near future would include 62,300 square feet of building and 300 additional parking spaces. There are two issues relative to the phasing plan including grading impacts and tree loss in Phases III and IV and the provision of parking decks totalling 740 parking spaces, seven years after the final phase has been completed. Wooddale Church Expansion 5 February 19, 1988 With regards to grading and tree loss, approximately one acre of significant oak trees would be lost due to construction during Phase V. In addition, approximately twelve acres of Chinese elm and poplar trees along Bryant Lake Drive would be removed to accomodate future parking concurrent with Phase III. The trees on the property may help offset the massiveness and height of the structure. The views of the church would be dramatically different from Highway #169 and Bryant Lake Drive with the removal of the twelve acres of trees. One alternative to tree removal would be to put a third level of parking in Phase III and/or to provide a second level of parking on Phase I to preserve more of the natural features. The total building program of the church is proposed to be completed with Phase V in the year 1998. The traffic study indicates that a total attendance on Sunday would be 4,000 in the year 2000, raises the question as to whether or not enough parking would be provided on-site to meet the demands of the church with the completion of Phase V. Although parking would meet or exceed the City's Ordinance in all phases, it is more a question of whether or not the church has adequately addressed the timing and demands for parking. The traffic study indicates that the proposed number of parking spaces, at 2,250, appears high; however, on-site parking for 2,000 or more vehicles appears justifiable if the church's growth projections are accurate and planned Sunday morning activities follow the current schedule. Since 1,510 parking spaces are provided on-grade, and the parking demand at final construction is 2,000 according to the traffic study means that there would be a shortage of 490 parking spaces on-site. According to the church's projected parking demand, the shortage would be 740 spaces. This parking situation is similar to the Plitt and Ciatti's restaurant where the developer indicated that if there was a need for additional parking, they would build a parking deck in the future. The plans, as approved by the Planning Conmission and City Council, require that the parking deck be built concurrent with construction. The church should provide the parking decks concurrent with Phase V. Architecture The church structure is proposed to be constructed of facebrick to match the existing brick on Phases I and II, glass, and metal wall panels or standing seam metal panel with a color and texture to complement the facebrick. Although the proponents have not demonstrated meeting the 75% facebrick, glass, or better requirement of the City Code, it appears from looking at the priinaq building elevations that the structure is approximately 50% brick and 50% metal panel, which would not conform to Code. Storm Water Runoff The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has a maximum discharge restriction at an outlet pipe adjacent to Bryant Lane of ten cubic feet per second. This means that a pond must be constructed to accomodate storage of water on-site before being discharged into the adjacent storm water system. The pond is proposed to be constructed with Phase IV. The proponent needs to provide the storm water run-off calculations which will determine the actual size of the pond and indicate whether or not the ponds should be constructed concurrent with Phase III or subsequent phases. In order to construct the pond, a portion of the twelve acres of Chinese elm and poplar trees must be removed adjacent to Bryant Lare. r Wooddale Church Expansion 6 February 19, 1988 Tree LOSS With Phase III construction, only one, 19-inch oak tree would be lost due to construction which would require a 100% tree replacement, or 19 total caliper inches. Concurrent with Phase III, in order to prepare a pad for future parking areas and to create a storm water holding pond, the church proposes, concurrent with Phase III to clear cut approximately twelve acres of Chinese elm and poplar trees along the roadway. The trees collectively provide a mass which offsets the height and massiveness of the church on the property. Since the 50-foot setback is required between parking and Bryant Lane, there will be adequate room to screen the future parking areas. Trail Systems As a condition of a 1981 approval, the church was to grade a bench for a future trail along Bryant Lake Drive which has been completed. In addition, a trail connection to the regional park is to be completed during Phase IV and V of the church construction or after the regional trails are completed within the park area. Grading Figure 15 contained within the brochure depicts a site plan and grading plan for Phase III. Since the site is relatively level, minimum grading will be required to provide the parking and building pad area. None of the proposed grading would encroach into the oak hardwood trees with the exception of one, 19-inch oak tree. Landscaping The amount of landscaping required with Phase III construction would be based on a caliper inch requirement based on building square footage, transition to the adjoining land uses, and screening of parking areas from adjoining roadways. The master plan indicates, that based upon ultimate site development, an additional 97 caliper inches of trees would be required to meet the City Ordinance. Through Phase III, there is enough landscaping provided on-site to meet the caliper inch requirement and screening requirement of parking areas; however, given the physical mass of the church, and height of the structure, additional large mass plantings of shade trees and conifers are necessary to provide a better visual transition to the adjoinirg residential neighborhoods and to downplay the massiveness of the structure on -si te. Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) An EAW and Indirect Source Permit is required by the PCA since more than 1,000 parking spaces are proposed on this site. The PCA is the regulating governmental unit and will make the final determination as to findings of no significant impacts. Conclusions The proposed 1988 Master Plan is an amendment to the original 1981 PUD. The plan is a capacity plan which shows the ultimate potential use of the site by the church. The Corgnission is requested by the church to act on a variance request from 30 to 75 feet for the sanctuary and from 25 to 125 feet for the spire. The variances, if granted, would be for the second tallest structure in the comnunity outside of the Wooddale Church Expansion 7 February 19, 1988 radio towers along Valley View Road. The church, at 75 feet in height, would be comparable in height to the Marquette Bank building. The variance s e c t i o n t a l k e d about the pros and cons of the granting of the variances. The Co m m i s s i o n m u s t decide if the PUD Amendment is acceptable, if it represents the best u s e a n d s i t e plan for the property, and if the variance request is unique to the p r o p e r t y a n d would not establish a precedent elsewhere within the community . T h e r e a r e additional issues raised in the Staff Report: 1. The need for parking ramps concurrent with building construction. 2. Non-compliance with the exterior building material requirement o f 7 5 % facebrick or better. 3. The removal of approximately one acre of mature oak forest and twelve a c r e s of tree mass (poplar and Chinese elm). 4. The physical mass of the church as it relates to the impacts on-site a n d t h e adjoining land uses. 5. The need for improved internal circulation through the provision o f a protected lane, wider drive lanes, and wider access points to the r o a d systems. ALTERNATIVES I. If the Planning Commission finds that the PhD Amendment is acceptable a n d represents the best use for this site and the Site Plan is appropriate f o r the property, and the variances are unique, then approval of the pr o j e c t should be based on plans dated February 19, 1988, the Staff Report d a t e d February 19, 1988, and based upon the following conditions: A. Prior to City Council review: 1. Developer shall provide information which demonstrates that the building materials are in compliance with the exterior building materials requirement of the City Code. 2. The site plan shall be modified to provide improved internal circulation through the provision of cl protected lane of 28 feet in width, revise all driveways to a 28-foot wide standard, provide two lanes of access out of the site and one lane of access into the site at all driveways. 3. Revise the phasing plan to construct all parking decks prior to or concurrent with Phase V. 4. Modify the site plan to retain the tree mass of aspen and elm vegetation along Bryant Lane and provide additional parking within parking decks with additional levels over Phase I, II, and III. 5. Provide the required storm water run-off calculations and ponding requirements for review by the City Engineer. Wooddale Church Expansion 8 February 19, 1988 6. Submit samples of the exterior building materials for review. 7. Modify the landscape plan to provide additional and larger shade and coniferous trees to provide a better visual transition to the adjoining residential properties and to downplay the physical mass and height of the building upon adjoining properties and public roads. B. Prior to Building permit issuance: 1. Stake the proposed construction limits with a snow fence and stake and place the erosion control fencing barriers as required by the City Engineer and the Watershed District. 2. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. 3. Submit samples of the exterior building materials for review. C. Prior to grading permit issuance: 1. Provide detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. 2. Provide detailed storm water run-off, erosion control and utility plans for review by the City Engineer. If the Planning Commission finds that the use of this site for a church is appropriate in terms of its size and height, but feel that the site plan would benefit from revisions and/or additional information relative to better internal circulation, a resolution of the parking phasing issue, transition to the adjoining land uses, softening of off-site impacts, and compliance with the external materials to Code, then the Comnission may wish to consider returning the development plans to the proponent for revisions and continue the Public Hearing. If the Planning Commission finds that the site plan is not acceptable, that the project is too intense in terms of the site usage and that the physical mass of the church and height cannot be mitigated nor has a substantial arguement been made for creating a unique situation for building height at 200 feet then the Commission may choose to recommend denial of the request as submitted. Eden Prairie Planning Commission -5- February 22, 1988 outlot for construction of a 15,500 sq. ft. retail facility, based on plans dated February 2, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated February 19, 1988. Motion carried 4-0-0. B. WOODDALE CHURCH, by Wooddale Church. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 31 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Amendment with the Public Zoning District on 31 acres with variance for structure height to 200 feet, and Environmental Assessment Worksheet Review for the construction of 200,000 square feet of church and educational uses. Location: Southwest corner of Shady Oak Road and Bryant Lake Drive. Franzen introduced the project and the proponents representa- tive John Uban who in turn introduced Reverend White who gave the history and mission of Wooddale Church. Uban presented the proposed project as a regional church site and felt they were meeting the goals of the City with regard to meeting the peoples needs not only on the commercial side but the spiritual side as well. He indicated that the Golden Ridge subdivision has been in the area for a long time and the church has been sensitive to their concerns. This project would necessitate the removal of cottonwood trees to allow for the storage pond and access to the parking lot. The master plan to be approved would consist of 166,700 sq. ft. of floor area. 75' to the top of the sanctuary and 200' to the top of the spire. The size of the sanctuary would accommodate 2,000 seats. Parking proposed would be 2,250 spaces requiring an EAW and an indirect source permit from the PCA. Uban spoke to the issue of a parking deck and shared parking with neighboring businesses. They want to live with proposed parking plan in Phase III and IV, and before Phase V assess the parking needs and address additional needs at that time. Bob Virtu, architect for proponent, stated this was a building of special quality consisting of the best acoustics and a strong presence. He stated the building was a measurable artistic experience with regard to the steeple. They felt the spire was scaled in accordance with the FAA, the project has 75% face brick, and meets the requirements of the City as set forth and meets the recommendations of the Staff. Franzen stated the City was dealing with policy issues on the land use, the size of the church, and the height of the church. The traffic study reported there are no traffic problems. A building of this height was usually found in a Eden Prairie Planning Commission -6- February 22, 1988 major center area. The church desires to become a regional church in a low-profile area. The City was concerned that there be enough parking and that a great loss of trees does not occur in the creation of parking lots. The Staff declined making an outright approval or denial but presented pros and cons to be reviewed. These are listed in the Staff Report dated February 19, 1988. Ruebling inquired that the original request for an 1800 seat sanctuary was only being increased by 200 seats. This did not seem to be much of an increase in view of the square footage being requested in the project. Proponent responded that the square footage would cover classrooms for sunday school and adult education in order to expand the educational program. A small chapel and a gymnasium are also included. Bye inquired if those facilities were approved prior to this phase. Franzen replied affirmatively that they were approved in the last phase. Anderson commented that this was a low-intensity area and he was concerned with this becoming regional use. Ruebling stated he did not have a problem with the height or size as long as the surrounding neighborhood did not object. He would like as many trees saved as possible in the area. He felt a two deck parking ramp would supply parking needs at a later date. Dodge inquired about the 2250 parking spaces, if this was enough. Franzen commented that the code requirements for parking was based on the number of seats which would mean 667 spaces. The churches demand for parking is more than code would require. Proponent stated they would like to address the parking with each phase. Anderson felt the variance could be approved if there was no other area for a regional use, but the City does have other areas available for regional uses. Ruebling stated the whole character has changed in the area. The people who work in the seven story office building do not live in Eden Prairie and therefore it is a regional use. In that light, if people are coming to the church from other areas, it would be classified as well as regional. Franzen commented that the church was not in the middle of a residential area but rather on the edge. Hallett expressed support due to the traffic not being a problem on Sunday. He felt there possibly could be a ;-7-1 Eden Prairie Planning Commission -7- February 22, 1988 better area but the church was already there. He was concerned about the parking and removing trees. Franzen reported that replacement of trees would be based on a percentage of significant trees removed on the property. Hallett inquired how City can protect itself if Phase V was built and no parking added. Franzen responded that neighbors may complain and Staff would address the issue and attempt to resolve it with the church. Or, City Staff may observe parking problems and would then contact the church. Since the church is a PUD they would have to come back before the Planning Commission and indicate how they would be addressing the parking problem. Ruebling and Anderson inquired about the possibility of shared parking. Proponent responded they are presently share parking and want to use adjoining sites before having to build a parking deck. Hallett inquired how City could tie the church into a parking ramp in the future. Franzen responded that language in the development agreement could require decks to be constructed concurrrent with or prior to Phase V and that church must return to the Planning Commission with each subsequent phase. Five years down the road the church may know more accurately about their parking needs. Bye and Anderson felt the change in the zoning to regional would dictate change in the area. Ruebling had no problem in defining it as a regional. Dodge was concerned with the parking and inquired if there was not enough parking why not scale down the size of the building to be in accordance with parking available. She suggested the alternative of granting this proposed project with the stipulation of no further expansion in the future on this site. Franzen summarized options available such as parking decks, scale down the church activities, and shared parking. He added that Phase IV and Phase V would come back before the Planning Commission for consideration and parking projec- tions would be assessed. Dodge stated on site parking was preferred instead of decks. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Ruebling and seconded by Bye to close the public hearing. Motion carried 4-0-0. Eden Prairie Planning Commission -8- February 22, 1988 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Ruebling and seconded by Bye to retu r n proposal to proponent with request that parking plan be restructured with an attempt to save additional trees o n t h i s site and revise the phasing plan to resolve the parking demand/provision issue so parking problems would not oc c u r . Motion carried 4-0-0. MOTION 3: Motion was made by Ruebling and seconded by Bye to amen d Motion 2 to state proponent shall return to Commission o n March 28, 1988 and subject to review shall present prop o s e d project to City Council on April 5, 1988. Motion carried 4-0-0. V. OLD BUSINESS None VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Review of DNR Protected Waters Permit No. 88-6186 a n d N o . 88-6208 for temporary drainage and control structure improvements to Little Grass Lake. Franzen introduced Ed Crozier of the U.S. Fish and Wil d l i f e Service, who would be addressing the land alteration t o control rough fish population, encourage aquatic plant g r o w t h and to improve the habitat for waterfowl through water l e v e l management by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Crozier stated the work would consist of the installat i o n o f two control structures to allow control of water level s o n Big and Little Rice Lake. One of the structures would replace a beaver dam on the outflow stream, and the ot h e r would be a ditch that would be dug to connect Little R i c e Lake to a stream 120' to the east that flows into the Minnesota River. Hallett inquired ii public hunting was allowed on the l a n d . Crozier responded negatively to adult hunters but state d t h a t there would be training on the site for younger childr e n . T h e Peterson property was however leased to hunters. Hallett inquired if public hunting was in the long-rang e plan. Crozier responded that possibly goose hunting wh e n t h e fowl population increases in the future. 57i) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION # -45 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE FARM 2ND ADDITION FOR COUNTRYSIDE INVESTMENTS, INC. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of The Farm 2nd Addition for Countryside Investments, Inc., dated March 30, 1988, consisting of 30 acres into 17 lots and 1 outlot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 5th day of April, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk C-(1 t'U §.11V;06 AREA LOCATION MAP STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: PROJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/ FEE OWNERS: REQUEST: Planning Comission Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning March 11, 1988 The Farm 2nd Addition North of the intersection of Duck Lake Trail and Loralee Lane Countryside Investments, Inc. and Dean Severson 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.95 acres and from Public to R1-13.5 on 4.7 acres. 2. Preliminary Plat of 30 acres into 17 lots and 1 outlot. B ackground This site is currently designated on the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide Plan for development as Low Density Residential. Surrounding land use designations include Low Density Residential to the south and west; Public Open Space to the north; and, Church to the east. Specific land uses in this area include the Edinborough Addition, zoned R1-13.5 to the west; Sterling Field, zoned R1-22 to the south; Purgatory Creek/Open Space to the north; and, the King of Glory Church to the east. The proponent is requesting a Zoning District Change and Preliminary Platting to allow for the construction of 16 single family units. Site Plan/Preliminary Plat The site plan depicts the division of a 6.5-acre tract into 16 single family lots with a requested zoning of R1-13.5. All of the lots within the subdivision meet the minimum The Farm 2nd Addition 2 March 11, 1988 requirements of the R1-13.5 zoning district, lot sizes in the subdivision range from a maximum of 30,875 square feet adjacent the flood plain to the minimum required within the R1-13.5 zoning of 13,500 square feet. Average lot sizes are 16,608 square feet. Access to the project would be provided by a single cul-de-sac accessing from Duck Lake Trail. Although the cul-de-sac exceeds the 500-foot maximum length by 100 feet, no opportunity exists to continue the road through. As part of the overall trail system in this area, the proponent will be required to provide a 20-foot trail easement along the north side of Duck Lake Trail along the entire frontage. The property, north of Lots 5 and 12, is within the Purgatory Creek conservancy area. The conservancy area was envisioned as a no-build zone to protect the slopes along the 100-year flood plain. There are 8 lots within this zone. The Director of Community Services has reviewed this and indicated the City has already purchased in excess of 100 acres of flood plain adjacent to the slopes and the proponent is dedicating an additional 11.47 acres and feels that additional land area would not be needed. He did suggest limiting grading on the slope to retain as much as the original character as possible. The plat consists of the entire 30-acre tract of land which is ovned by the King of Glory Church and the Severson's. A total of 17 lots are proposed, 16 of which will be single family homes, while Lot 17, containing approximately 11.88 acres, will continue under ownership of the church. Outlot A, which contains 11.47 acres and is part of the Purgatory Creek flood plain, is proposed to be dedicated to the City. In addition, that portion of Lots 8 and 9 below the 100-year flood plain elevation shall be placed in a drainage and utility easement. Grading and Utilities The existing site slopes from a high point of the 938 elevation along the western property line and the 924 contour elevation along the eastern property line towards the center portion of the site and to the north flood plain area. A low point of 918 exists within the center of the site with a natural drainage flow in a northerly direction to the 870 contour elevation adjacent the 100-year flood plain elevation. As the grading plan indicates, the majority of the site will be graded to some extent. Grading proposed includes a maximum cut of 12 feet along the eastern property line and 8 feet along the western property line with a maximum fill amount of 10 feet occuring adjacent the flood plain. Slopes along the rear of Lots 8 and 9 shall be revised to reflect a 3:1 slope. The proposed grading plan depicts 40-foot building pads. Staff's current review of a sample of building permits has indicated that approximately 50% of the permits issued exeed a 40-foot building pad width. Because of this, and in order to provide maximum flexibility to the developer and future builder, the proposed grading plan shall be revised to reflect 50-foot building pads on a minimum of 50% of the lots. — There are approximately 133 evergreen trees averaging between 4 to 10 inches in diameter along the western property line. Approximately 50% of these trees will be removed as part of the grading of the site. The Tree Preservation Policy requires the replacement of those trees 12 inches in diameter or greater. Of those trees being removed, three are subject to tree replacement. A reforestation plan depicting 36 caliper inches of tree replacement is required prior to Council review. The Farm 2nd Addition 3 March 11, 1988 Water and sanitary sewer are available to this s i t e f r o m e x i s t i n g u t i l i t i e s including a 12-inch water line located within Duck La k e T r a i l a n d a 1 0 - i n c h s e w e r line located along the north property line. Storm wat e r r u n - o f f i s p r o p o s e d t o b e collected in the catch basin system located within the pr o p o s e d r o a d a n d d i s c h a r g e d to the 100-year flood plain. As part of the overall drai n a g e d e s i g n , t h e p r o p o n e n t will be required to relocate the existing storm sewer p i p e a n d c a t c h b a s i n f r o m between Lots 13 and 14 to between Lots 14 and 15, a n d r e v i s e t h e g r a d i n g p l a n t o reflect drainage swales between Lots 4 and 5 and Lot s 5 a n d 6 t o p r o v i d e p o s i t i v e drainage to the street. STAFF REC0N1MENDATIONS Staff would recommend approval of the proposed subdivi s i o n i n t o 1 7 l o t s a n d 1 o u t l o t based upon plans dated February 24, 1988, subject to th e S t a f f R e p o r t , d a t e d M a r c h 11, 1988, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council review, proponent shall: A. Revise the grading plan to reflect drainage swales bet w e e n L o t s 4 and 5 and Lots 5 and 6 and a maximum 3:1 slope along t h e r e a r o f t h e Lots 8 and 9. B. Revise the utility plan to reflect the relocation of t h e e x i s t i n g catch basin system and storm sewer pipes from between L o t s 1 3 a n d 14, to between Lots 14 and 15. C. Provide a tree replacement plan which depicts a total o f 3 6 c a l i p e r inches of plant material. D. Provide the City with a 20-foot trail easement along t h e s o u t h e r n property line. E. Revise the plans to reflect a 50-foot building pad on a m i n i m u m o f 50% of the lots. F. Revise the plans to reflect a drainage and utility ease m e n t a l o n g the rear of Lots 8 and 9. 2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water run-off, erosion control, a n d u t i l i t y plans for review by the City Engineer. B. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion contr o l p l a n s f o r review by the Watershed District. 3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall pay t h e a p p r o p r i a t e C a s h Park Fee. 4. Prior to Grading permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours i n a d v a n c e of grading. The Farm 2nd Addition 4 March 11, 1988 B. Stake the construction limits with erosion control fencing. C. Stake the grading limits with a snow fence. Any trees lost outside the proposed grading linits shall be replaced on a cross-sectional truck area inch per area inch basis. ( UNAPPROVED MINUTES Eden Prairie Planning Commission -6- March 14, 1988 D. THE FARM 2ND ADDITION, by Countryside Investments, Inc. Request for Zoning District from Ru r a l t o R 1 - 1 3 . 5 on 1.95 acres and from Public to R1-13.5 o n 4 . 7 a c r e s , and Preliminary Plat of 30 acres into 17 l o t s a n d 1 outlot. Location: North of the intersec t i o n o f D u c k Lake Trail and Loralee Lane. A public he a r i n g . Ron Krueger, representative for the propo n e n t , p r e s e n t e d the project located just west of the King o f G l o r y C h u r c h The plan proposed would take 6-1/2 acres a n d r e s u l t i n 1 6 single family lots, with an average lot s i z e o f 1 6 , 6 0 8 s q . ft. Uram stated that an issue of concern was t h e p r o p o s e d 4 0 f t . wide building pads. Staff had reviewed a s a m p l e o f b u i l d i n g permits recently issued, and found that a p p r o x i m a t e l y 5 0 % o f the building permits issued were for hou s i n g p a d s e x c e e d i n g 40 ft. in width. In order to allow more f r e e d o m f o r t h e builders, and to avoid the need for chan g i n g g r a d i n g p l a n s in the field, Staff is recommending that at l e a s t 5 0 % o f t h e building pads be designed with a 50 ft. w i d t h . W i t h t h e m i x of 40 ft. and 50 ft. house pads, the Sta f f r e c o m m e n d e d approval based upon plans dated February 2 4 , 1 9 8 8 . Proponent stated that they concur with a 5 0 f t . a n d 4 0 f t . mix of lot building pads. Jerry Anderson, 17831 Duck Lake Trail, s t a t e d t h a t t h e w a t e r runs down into his lot on the south side o f D u c k L a k e T r a i l from the church parking lot at the prese n t t i m e a n d i n q u i r e d if there would be a storm sewer drainage s y s t e m i n s t a l l e d t o handle the increase. Uram responded that t h e d r a i n a g e o n t h e south side had not been addressed in thi s p r o p o s a l . H e invited Mr. Anderson to call the office d u r i n g t h e d a y a n d they would look into the matter. . Krueger stated that this project would no t i m p a c t t h e drainage to the church parking lot as th e s t o r m d r a i n a g e goes to the north. Eden Prairie Planning Commission -7- March 14, 1988 MOTION 1: Motion was made by Bye and seconded by F e l l t o c l o s e t h e public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Bye and seconded b y F e l l t o r e c o m m e n d t o the City Council approval of the requ e s t o f C o u n t r y s i d e Investments, Inc., for Zoning District C h a n g e f r o m R u r a l t o R1-13.5 on 1.95 acres and from Public t o R 1 - 1 3 . 5 o n 4 . 7 acres, for The Farm 2nd Addition, bas e d o n p l a n s a n d w r i t t e n materials dated February 16, and Febru a r y 2 4 , 1 9 8 8 , s u b j e c t to the recommendations of the Staff Re p o r t d a t e d M a r c h 1 1 , 1988, and the addition of 1.G. To revi e w t h e d r a i n a g e o n t h e south side of Duck Lake Trail. Motion carried 6-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Bye and seconded by F e l l t o r e c o m m e n d t o the City Council approval of the reque s t o f C o u n t r y s i d e Investments,Inc. for Preliminary Plat o f 3 0 a c r e s i n t o 1 7 lots and one outlot for The Farm 23nd A d d i t i o n , b a s e d o n plans and written materials dated Febr u a r y 1 6 , a n d F e b r u a r y 234, 1988, subject to the recommendatio n s o f t h e S t a f f Report dated March 11, 1988, and as a m e n d e d i n p r e v i o u s motion. Motion carried 6-0-0 'SVe UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE l'ARKS, RECRI.A7 ION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Monday, March 21, 1988 7:30 p.m., City Hall 7600 Executive Drive COMMISSION MEMBI RS PRESINT: COMMISSION MEMBI HS ABSENT: COMMISSION STAFF: I. ROLL CALL Pat Breitenstein, chairperson; Bud Baker, Moe Cook, Karon Joyer, Brian Mikkelson, Pat Richard, Charles Shaw None Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services, Rick Bolinske, Superintendent of Recreation, Lyndell Frey, Recreation Supervisor, Sandy Werts, Lori Helling, Athletic Coordinator The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by chairperson, Pat Breitenstein. II. APPROVAL OF AcrNDA Lambert added A. Carmel Park under VIII. New Business. III . APPROVAL or MINUTES OF MARCH 7, 1988 The minutes were lost in the mail and are being redone. IV. PETITIONS, RI OM STS AND COMMUNICATIONS None V. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. The Farm 2nd Addition Refer to *tall report dated March 11, 1988. Ron Krueirr was present at the meeting representing Countryside Investments. This site is located north of Duck Lake Trail and Loralee Ian ,. The proposal is to divide the 30 acres into 16 shy& 1.4 lots. The City is requesting that the developer ale the pond and land to the north to the City. TheY 4 "" not requiring a trail since the land to the east is °wt." iiY the church and will not be developed. Baker ad', I if laild within the floodplain will remain private properlY 11 "'r e is a scenic easement. Lambert said the s oulls ,'”I will remain private property. He added that the nmi utility easement referred to in the staff repo, I .•.'1 ..1hes the scenic easement. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Mar. 21, 1988 -2- Richard asked for the definition of a scenic easement. Lambert said it is document filed with the County which says that the land will be maintained in its natural condition. MOTION: Baker moved to recommend approval of The Farm 2nd Addition per staff report with the addition of a scenic easement from the floodplain north. Shaw seconded the motion and it passed 7-0. B. Alpine Estates 2nd Addition Refer to staff report dated March 11, 1988. Krueger reviewed the site which is located east of Alpine Trail and south of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific railroad. The proposal is for 16 single family lots on 8.36 acres. Lambert said development has been proposed for this site several times before, but the original proposal for a townhouse development was rejected because of unacceptable land use and the next proposal for a single family development was dropped because 80,000 Cu. ft. of fill would have been required. Baker asked if the railroad will be abandoned. Lambert said it will not be abandoned in the near future. Cook asked what will be the closest park to this development. Lambert said it would be Round Lake Park. Baker asked if there would be any access to the creek valley. Lambert said no; however, there is a possibility further to the north. MOTION: Cook moved to recommend approval of Alpine Estates 2nd Addition per staff report. Mikkelson seconded the motion and it passed 7-0. C. Eden Place Center Refer to staff report dated March 11, 1988. Brian Klutz was present at the meeting to review the proposal. The site is located at the intersection of Glen Lane and Eden Road and calls for a 52,000 sq. ft. retail center including a restaurant, offices and retail. There are some mature oaks on the restaurant side which will be maintained. Other trees that are removed will be replaced. Sidewalks are proposed to connect to peripheral sidewalks. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-46 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and, WHEREAS, the proposal of Associated Investments, Inc., for development of Golf Point for Medium Density Residential use requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: approximately 2.8 acres located south of Valley View Road, east of Chicago & Northwestern Railroad, be modified from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 5th day of April, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: Jóhn D. Frane, City Clk- CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #88-47 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GOLF POINT FOR ASSOCIATED INVESTMENTS, INC. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Golf Point for Associated Investments, Inc., dated February 29, 1988, consisting of 2.8 acres into 15 lots and 1 outlot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 5th day of April, 19 Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: 5-An D. Frane, City Clerk STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: 'Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner I-TIRT)UGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning March 11, 1988 Golf Point Townhomes South of Valley View Road, east of Chicago and Northwestern Railroad Associated Investors, Inc. Equitable Life Insurance Company 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on 2.8 acres. 2. Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 2.8 acres. 3. Preliminary Plat of 2.8 acres into 15 lots and 1 outlot. DATE: PROJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: FEE OWNER: REQUEST: Background This site is currently guided Low Density Residential. Surrounding lard uses are the railroad tracks to the west; Public Open Space/golf course to the south and east; and, High Density Residential to the north. The 1972 Edenvale RID depicted this site for a multiple use totalling 50 units. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change The change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan is not so much a question of how it effects the Guide Plan balance, since a minimum number of housing units are involved, but more a question of whether or not the multiple family land use is the best land use for this site and is this the best possible site plan for the property. A multiple family land use may be more practical than single family since the site is AREA LOCATION MAP 1,7')) Golf Point Townhomes 2 March 11, 1988 narrow and sloping and clustering would make better use of the limited buildable area. This site is sloping towards the golf course and no significant trees exist on the property so the development would have minimum impacts on natural features. Sewer and water service is available to this site. Site Plan The proposed site plan is for 15 townhouse units at a density of 5.4 units per acre which is about average for townhome densities in Eden Prairie. The project meets all Shoreland Ordinance requirements. The site plan meets all the zoning requirements for RM-6.5 zoning including Floor Area Ratio (FAR), setbacks, and parking. This project is dependent upon the realignment of Valley View Road to provide additional land in order for the project to meet the requirements of the RM-6.5 zoning district. Some right-of-way should be vacated by the City Council. Since the time frame for the relocation of Valley View Road is dependent upon a decision by the railroad as to whether it will be abandoned or not, this project should not proceed to building permit until that information is known. If the railroad is not abandoned, the current plan is for a bridge over the tracks which should not impact this project. If the plan for Valley View Road is changed to an on-grade crossing, then some units may be impacted. Purgatory Creek Master Plan Approximately one-half of this site is in the Purgatory Creek Conservancy Area and the balance of the site is in the transition zone. The Director of Community Services has indicated that the natural character of Purgatory Creek in this area was changed and impacted by the construction of Edenvale Golf Course in the 1970's. Since no significant trees exist on site and the land is covered with grass, the construction of townhomes should have minimal impact. In addition, the nearest townhome unit is 150 feet from the creek. The choice is for the City to purchase the property and the Park and Recreation Staff do not recommend this. The developer should dedicate the land area within the 100-year flood plain to the City or place a utility and scenic easement over it. Grading The site slopes toward the golf course. Since the site plan is tight, it will not be possible to provide sufficient berming along Valley View Road for screening and buffering of the overhead garage doors. Though the plan screens the parking areas with the use of plant materials and fencing, the plan will have to rely heavily on the use of materials to break up the view of the overall building mass and the garage doors. The flood elevation for the July, 1987, flood in this area was 843.8. If these homes existed last July, 10 of the 15 units would have water in the lower levels. Architecture The two-story walk-out units make good use of the natural sloping grades on the site. The staggering of the roofline helps to break up the overall building mass. Since the site plan is tight, the building fronts will be aligned in a row and leaves little opportunity for staggering which could help break up the building mass. '59C) Golf Point Tohnhomes 3 March 11, 1988 At this time, the proponent has not identified the color ch o i c e s f o r t h e b u i l d i n g s . To add variety to the project, and visual interest, there sh o u l d b e a c a n n o n c o l o r for either the siding or the shingles and different accent c o l o r s f o r e a c h o f t h e buildings. Landscaping The narrow and sloping sites makes landscaping difficult. L a n d s c a p i n g r e q u i r e d f o r this project is dependent on the caliper inch requirement p e r C i t y C o d e , s c r e e n i n g of the parking areas, and landscaping necessary to bre a k u p t h e v i e w s o f t h e building mass and to downplay the visual impacts of the ov e r h e a d d o o r s . S i n c e t h e site plan is tight, the proposed landscaping should be incre a s e d i n s i z e a n d s o m e additional shale trees planted along Valley View Road wh e r e s p a c e p e r m i t s . T h e conifer height should be increased to ten feet and the sug a r m a p l e a n d g r e e n a s h variety is increased to a four-inch minimum. The shrubbery p r o p o s e d a t t h e d r i v e w a y entrances will have to be modified to accomodate an eig h t - f o o t w i d e b i k e t r a i l . There is no existing vegetation on-site and no tree replac e m e n t w i l l b e r e q u i r e d . Trails - Parks As part of Valley View Road upgrade there will be an 8-f o o t b i k e t r a i l o n t h e s o u t h side of Valley View Road and a 5-foot sidewalk on the nor t h s i d e . T h e n e a r e s t p a r k is Edenvale on the corner of Edenvale Boulevard and Valle y V i e w R o a d t o t h e w e s t o f the site. Access Two access points are proposed out to new Valley View Road . B a s e d u p o n t h e n e w r o a d designs, sight vision distance will be acceptable in both d i r e c t i o n s . STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Staff would recommend approval of the request for Co m p r e h e n s i v e G u i d e P l a n Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density R e s i d e n t i a l , Z o n i n g D i s t r i c t Change from Rural to RM-6.5, and Preliminary Plat of 2.8 a c r e s i n t o 1 5 l o t s , b a s e d on plans dated February 12, 1988, subject to the following c o n d i t i o n s : 1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: A. Modify the landscape plan to increase the plant material s i z e s a n d to provide additional shale trees to help break up the vie w o f t h e building mass and garage doors from Valley View Road. B. Provide an overall color scheme and material board sa m p l e f o r review. 2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall: A. Provide detailed storm water run-off, erosion control pla n s , a n d utility plans for review by the City Engineer. B. Provide detailed storm water run-off and erosion control p l a n s f o r review by the Watershed District. Golf Point Totstihomes 4 March 11, 1988 3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall: A. _Provide samples of the exterior building materials f o r r e v i e w . B. Notify the Watershed District and the City at least 48 h o u r s i n advance of grading. C. Contact the City Fire Marshal for Fire requirements. 4. This project would be contingent upon the realignm e n t a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n o f Valley View Road. The project could proceed to 1 s t r e a d i n g a t t h e C i t y Council but 2nd reading should not occur until the r a i l r o a d c r o s s i n g i s s u e is resolved. ASSOCIATED INVESTMENTS mc 6963 WOODLAND DRIVE • EDEN PRAIRIE , M I N N E S O T A 5 5 3 4 6 • ( 6 1 2 ) 9 1 7 - 2 5 1 6 March 21, 1988 Eden Prairie Planning Commission and City Council C/O Mr. Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner City of Eden Prairie Dear Mr. Franzen, Planning Commission a n d C o u n c i l M e m b e r s , Per the planning commission hearing an d a c t i o n t a k e n M a r c h 1 4 , 1 9 8 8 , Associated Investments, Inc., the devel o p e r a g r e e s t o : I. Modify the landscape plan to incre a s e p l a n t m a t e r i a l s i z e a n d shade trees to help break up the view o f t h e p r o j e c t f r o m Valley View Road. 2. Provide storm run off and erosion cont r o l p l a n s p r i o r t o application for a building permit. 3. Raise the elevation of all units to exc e e d 8 4 3 . 8 ( h i g h w a t e r mark of July 1987), if the Watershed Di s t r i c t d o e s n o t m a k e alterations to the drain pipe out of th e g o l f c o u r s e a r e a . 4. Provide planning staff with a color sch e m e a n d m a t e r i a l b o a r d sample Cor review prior to building perm i t . 5. Have the planning commission review th e p r o j e c t i f a n y Significant changes occur regarding th e p o s s i b i l i t i e s o f a n at grade crossing of the railway. Sincerely, Thomas S. Robertson President TSR/sal UNAPPROVED MINUTES Eden Prairie Planning Commission -7- March 14, 1988 E. GOLF POINT, by Associated Investments, Inc. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from L o w D e n s i t y Residential to Medium Density Residential o n 2 . 8 a c r e s , Zoning District Change from Rural to R14-6 . 5 a n d Preliminary Platting of 2.8 acres into 15 l o t s a n d 1 outlot for construction of 15 townhouse u n i t s . L o c a t i o n : South of Valley View Road, east of the Chi c a g o & Northwestern Railroad. A public hearing. Tom Robertson, President of Associated In v e s t m e n t s , I n c . , presented the proposed site plan for 15 t o w n h o u s e u n i t s w i t h a density of 5.4 units per acre, the aver a g e f o r t o w n h o m e densities in Eden Prairie. He reported t h a t t h i s p r o j e c t would be dependent upon the realignment o f V a l l e y V i e w R o a d to provide additional land in order for t h e p r o j e c t t o m e e t the requirements of the zoning district. T h e r e l o c a t i o n o f Valley View Road would be dependent upon t h e d e c i s i o n o f t h e railroad as to whether it would be abando n e d . T h i s p r o j e c t would not proceed to building permit unti l t h e i n f o r m a t i o n Eden Prairie Planning Commission -8- March 14, 1988 was known. If the railroad was abandoned, the current plan would be for a bridge over the tracks which would not impact this project. Tom Robertson, Developer, indicated that the site impact would be minimal. The main concern was working with the people of the golf course. To avoid the driving of the golf balls into glass windows, the windows were placed on the other side of the building. The design of the property specifically addressed the problem of balls hitting the building. The townhomes would be in the price range of $90,000. This project would be contingent upon the Valley View Road Revision Resolution. Franzen stated that the site would be guided medium density allowing up to 2-1/2 units per acre. The townhomes make good use of the property, and with the recommended revisions meet all City Codes and Ordinances. The developer has staggered the buildings creating a residential look instead of institutional. Staff recommends approval but the project should not proceed to 2nd reading until the decision on Valley View Road, and the railroad crossing issue have been resolved. We do not want to approve a project and then go back in and make changes. Schuck commented that the property was under water last July. Franzen stated another 6" could be added to the site elevation. If the City was planning for another flood, then the City needs to raise flood plain elevations. He continued that the Commission could leave the site elevations the same, raise the pads or wait and see what the Watershed District report comes up with for an overall drainage solution. Fell stated he was in favor of raising the pad 6" unless the Watershed District Report comes up with an overall drainage solution. Hallett inquired if proponent talked to the golf course about buying the land. Proponent replied affirmatively but did not get any where with the discussion. Jack Uebler, 14447 Fairway Drive, requested verification of low density guidelines. Franzen replied low density was up to 2-1/2 units per acre and medium density was up to 10 units per acre. Robertson stated to audience if there were concerns regarding the use of the property, he would be happy to talk with them after the meeting. Eden Prairie Planning Commission -9- March 14, 1988 Fell inquired as to what percentage brick would be required on the project. Franzen replied that medium density residential zoning does not have a building material requirement. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Hallett to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Hallett to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Associated Investments, Inc., for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on 2.8 acres for Golf Point, based on plans and written materials dated February 12, and February 29, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 11, 1988, based on Watershed District's overall storm drainage solution or the building pads would be raised accordingly. Motion carried 6-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Anderson to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Associated Investments, Inc., for Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 for 15 townhouse units for Golf Point, based on plans and written materials dated February 12, and February 29, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 11, 1988, and as amended on the previous motion. Motion carried 6-0-0 MOTION 4: Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Hallett to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Associated Investments, Inc., for Preliminary Platting of 2.8 acres into 15 lots and one outlot for Golf Point, based on plans and written materials dated February 12, and February 29, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 11, 1988, and as amended on the previous motion. Motion carried 6-0-0 MOTION 5: Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Hallett to request that the proposal be returned to Planning Commission for review if significant changes occur in the proposed development between the 1st and 2nd reading. Motion carried 6-0-0 r9(D UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISS I O N M a r . 2 1 , 1 9 8 0 -3- Lambert said he has suggested that sidewalks be constructed on both Eden Road and Glen Lane along the entire parameter. Klutz said the developer has several concerns with putting sidewalks along both sides including the possibility of having to remove more trees to add sidewalks. Also the existence of a retaining wall will make it more difficult. Shaw asked what the advantages are of adding sidewalks at this point rather than waiting until later. Lambert said it is easier to construct sidewalks at this point before landscaping has been completed and it is more difficult to get the owner's approval for assessments later on. Joyer asked if sidewalks on both sides of the street will be required on all future developments. Lambert said all development south of Highway 5 in the "downtown" area will require this in the future although some will have to be added to existing developments. Klutz said another concern the developer has with constructing sidewalks is the 17 setback that is required by the City. He asked if sidewalks can be located in the right of way. Lambert said yes. MOTION: Shaw moved to recommend approval of Eden Place Center per staff recommendation. Richard seconded the motion and it passed 7-0. D. Golf Point Refer to staff report dated March 11, 1988. Tom Robertson was at the meeting representing Associated Investors. He reviewed the proposed development on the site which is located south of Valley View Road and east of the Chicago & Northwestern railroad. The plan calls for 15 townhouse units and depends upon the realignment of Valley View Road and whether the railroad is abandoned. There is a strong possibility that the situation with the railroad may remain the same as it was three months ago. The developer has agreed to construct sidewalks on the south side of Valley View Road. Lambert said about one-third of this site is within the Purgatory Creek Conservancy Area, but he recommends the conservancy requirement be waived since the natural character of Purgatory Creek in this area was changed by the construction of the golf course. He added that some of the land is located in the 100 year floodplain and should be either dedicated to the City or a scenic easement required. UNAPPROVED MINUTES 0,AIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Mar. 21, 1988 I -DEN Robertson said the developer has not made a decision on this since they are talking to the golf course about easement possibilities. Shaw asked if this proposal should be brought back to the commission prior to presenting to the City Council. Lambert said no. MOTION: Shaw recommended approval of Golf Point Townhomes per staff recommendation. Cook seconded the motion and )it passed 7-0. V I. I/FPORTS OF COMMISSIONERS, BOARDS AND STAFF A. Reports of Director of Community Services 1. Annual Report (cont. from March 7, 1988) Baker asked what the guidelines are for running programs. Lambert said all adult programs pay their own way ard do not include administrative costs. All youth programs that are special services such as skiing or tennis lessons are run at a break even point. Youth recreational services to the community are subsidized to a point, i.e. special events at the Community Center or summer playground programs. Baker asked at what point is it decided that the deficit is too large. Lambert said it it decided by the commissions and City Council. Shaw asked where money to make up the deficit comes from. Lambert said it comes from the City general fund. Lambert added that the Community Center could be operated on a break-even basis if staff were cut and the swimming pool and ice rink were used during peak demand times. He said he is comfortable with the guidelines as they are since this is the manner in which most cities operate and which the City Council has approved. Shaw said that child care is an area of visibility at this time and asked if the City is vulnerable to scrutiny. Bolinske discussed different child care options and programs for kids and said although usage and revenue have increased the past several weeks, he does not feel the City should be in the day care business if someone else is willing to meet the need. Joyer asked who is initiating the ideas. Bolinske said the parents are asking for these services. t, 6 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-48 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE EDEN PLACE CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT TO THE OVERALL EDEN GLEN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the Eden Place Center development is considered a proper amendment to the overall Eden Glen Planned Unit Development Concept; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the request of Prairie Entertainment Associates for PhD Concept Amendment approval to the overall Eden Glen Planned Unit Development Concept for the Eden Place Center development and recommended approval of the PUD Concept Amendment to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on April 5, 1988; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Eden Place Center development PUD Concept Amendment, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval to the overall Eden Glen Planned Unit Development Concept as outlined in the application materials for Eden Place Center. 3. That the PUD Concept Amendment meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated March 14, 1988. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 5th day of April, 19 giry D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 6') CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #88-49 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EDEN PLACE CENTER FOR PRAIRIE ENTERTAINMENT ASSOCIATES BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Eden Place Center for Prairie Entertainment Associates, dated March 10, 1988, consisting of 6.42 acres into 1 lot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Ed en Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 5th day of April, 19 Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Plat of 6.42 acres i_nto one lot for the of 52,000 square feet of retail and restaurant 2fn =j34 G- SE HYV y 4A!.) PROPOSED SITE 11111v/-9„: AREA LOCATION MAP 3r n•n STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning March 11, 1988 Eden Place Center Intersection of Glen Lane and Eden Road Margolis Brothers Paul Thomas 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 6.42 acres. 2. Zoning District Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District on 6.42 acres. FROM: THROUGH: DATE: PROJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: FEE OWNER: REQUEST: 3. Preliminary construction use. Background The Comprehensive Guide Plan des- ignates this site for Regional Commercial land uses. The Guide Plan also depicts surrounding land uses as Regional Commercial. The 1980 Eden Glen Center PUD depicted this site for a 40,000 square foot office building. Subsequently, in 1983, the PUD was amended to accommodate the 152-room Sheraton Hotel. In 1987, the PUD again was amended far this site to accommodate the Plitt Theaters and the Ciatti's Restaurant. Plitt Theaters elected not to proceed on this site because of the need for a parking ramp in order to provide adequate parking. Site Plan The site plan depicts the con- struction of 52,000 square feet of Eden Place Center 2 March 11, 1988 corimercial uses at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.186. The C-Regional Service zoning district would allow up to 0.20 FAR. The number of parking spaces required is 328; 349 are depicted on the site plan. Building and parking areas meet the setback requirements for the C-Regional zoning district. Four access points are shown on the plan and the access to the service entrance has a short sight vision distance; therefore, berming and plantings must be kept back to allow for good vision. Traffic The 198 5 BRW Traffic Study estimated a total of 510 p.m. peak hour trips for the Eden Glen Center PUG. The traffic study recommends that, in addition to roadway improvements, a 20% reduction in the p.m. peak hour traffic would also be necessary. A 20% reduction in p.m. peak hour traffic would be a total of 408 trips that could be permitted within this PH. A current review of existing uses, and the current proposal indicates, that a total of 415 p.m. peak hour trips, or 19% reduction, would be generated (the trip generation numbers for the shopping center are provided in the attached memo from BRW.) Planned Unit Development Uses The 1980 PUG depicted this site as an office use to save the oak trees and to take advantage of the excellent visibility afforded this site and its strong relationship with Lake Idlewild. The 1980 PUG was proposed with a mixture of uses as shown in the following table because there was a high demand for such uses expected at that time. The table below also compares the 1980 PUG to the current PUG with the recent proposal. The new PUD has less office and more commercial, more fast-foot restaurants than anticipated, and a slightly larger Class I sit-down restaurant. Comparison Between PUD's (Eden Glen) 1980 PUG Fast Food 8,000 sq. ft. Class I Restaurant 6,000 sq. ft. Retail 33,000 sq. ft. Office 66,000 sq. ft. Total 113,000 sq. ft. 1988 PUG 9,626 sq. ft. 7,300 sq. ft. 49,916 sq. ft. 43,485 sq. ft. 110,327 sq. ft. The PUG land use plan is a way of assuring a proper balance of land uses and a range of goods and services for the community. The 1980 RJD envisioned a mixture of land uses which related not only to one another in a complementary way, but also provided benefit for the residents and workers in terms of goods and services. The 1980 PUG was put together with a design framework manual prepared to integrate the visual impact of all individual sites within Eden Glen and protect against features which could be esthetically objectionable such as signage, lighting, and building materials, etc. Therefore, any request fcr a change in the land use would require an amendment to the PUD and would only be made if the developers could demonstrate that they have been successful in implementing the design framework manual and that the change would not detract from the overall strong image desired for Eden Glen. 6o3 Eden Place Center 3 March 11, 1988 The Planning Corrrnission, in their review of the PhD amendment, must decide whether or not the change in the plan is consistent with the original intent of the overall PhD. Architecture The Planning Commission and City Council has previously identified criteria for retail shopping including provisions for adequate parking, good access, internal circulation, minimal traffic impacts on the adjoining road system, and exterior materials and design themes. The Planning Comission and City Council has indicated on recent projects where sites are bounded by roadways that the project should have a front-door appearance on all sides. This project requires a large service area for docks and drive-in doors for semi-trucks. Aside from the fact that loading facilities must be screened from roads and adjoining land uses per ordinance, it should also look like more than the back side of a loading facility screened with landscaping. To that end, the proponent was charged with the task of developing an architecture which conveyed a front door appearance on the back side of the building. The developer has chosen to repeat elements on the front side including brick patterns, signage, roofline jogs, and other design details. The City Council has, in the past, had a policy discouraging strip malls in favor of internal double loaded malls. This policy was modified with the Rainbow Foods and Shady Oak Shopping Centers to allow for strip malls, but with a requirement for an 8-foot canopy designed to permit an enclosure in the future. An 8-foot metal canopy is provided across the store fronts where the majority of pedestrian traffic should occur on the Rainbow Foods and Shady Oak Shopping Centers. The building will be constructed out of brick and glass and meets the exterior requirements per Ordinance. The proponents have not provided samples of the exterior materials or color scheme. These materials should be provided for review prior to review by the City Council. The Eden Glen design framework manual indicated that exterior materials should be dark tone face brick and rrortor. Accent materials such as metal, wood, or stucco should be dark brown. The high degree of visibility afforded this project makes it essential that high quality durable permanent materials be used on all four sides of the proposal. The proponent has not furnished samples of exterior materials. However, we do know that dark brick will be the primary color. The Council has indicated a need to have a "Hometown Downtown" area in Eden Prairie with specialized architecture, site planning, signage, lighting, and landscaping unique to Eden Prairie and for which the land uses are those which meet the needs of the people who live here. The commercial projects should also be compatible, supportive, related, and oriented to pedestrian use. Oro question to address about building architecture is whether or not it fits with the current ideas for downtown. The project has specialized architecture with an 8- foot canopy. There are sidewalks throughout the project which connect to peripheral sidewalks. The center is of an appropriate scale, uses are compatible with the RID, and provides goods, services, and uses for the comunity. Tree Loss A total of 465 significant trees are located on this site; mostly oak with some spruce. The proposed tree loss is calculated at 44% and the replacement required is 176 caliper inches. Eden Place Center 4 March 11, 1988 La, The landscaping required for this project is based upon a caliper inch requirement related to the total building square footage, screening of loading and parking areas, and tree replacement. The plan meets the landscaping requirements per Code. Storm Water Run-off and Utilities The proposed storm water run-off plan collects water in catch basins within the existing parking lot which will be connected to an existing storm sewer system within Glen Road and Eden Road. Sewer and water service is available immediately adjacent to the site. Signage The signage proposal is weak and is not defined by criteria. In the absence of criteria, signs are reviewed on a case by case basis, are difficult to administer, and often leads to a hodge-podge of colors, shapes, and sizes. It is important for the developer to establish and commit to signage criteria. The following criteria should be Included as a condition of approval of the project: 1. Provide an architecturally defined signage area defined by color, texture, materials, details, and dimensions. 2. Lettering shall be individual letters and internally lit letters. Lighting Lighting should be the same as the lighting standards within the PUD which are down- cast cut-off square laninars for parking lot lighting. Sidewalks and Trails The Director of Cormunity Services has indicated a need for a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Glen Lane and Eden Road. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Staff would recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment, Zoning District Amendment, and Preliminary Plat based on plans dated March 10, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 11, 1988, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall : A. Submit color schemes and exterior building materials. B. Revise the plan to indicate sidewalks on Eden Road and Glen Lam. 2. Prior to Final Mat approval, proponent shall: A. Provide detailed utility and storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. Eden Place Center 5 March 11, 1988 B. Provide detailed storm water run-off and pros ion crntrol plans for review by the Watershed District. 3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Provide the exterior building samples and color samples for review. B. Provide signage plan and signage details for review. C. Provide examples of the lighting details for review. 4. Submit plans for review by the City Fire Marshal. 4. Prior to Grading permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Stake the proposed construction limits with a snow fence. Any trees that are lost outside of the snow fenced area shall be replaced on an area inch per area inch basis in accordance with the tree preservation policy. 5. The restaurant is a critical part of the PUD arid provides a needed service to the community. Retail alone is not appropriate and would continue to contribute to an overbalance of retail in the PUD which departs more from the intent of the original balance of land uses in the 1980 RM. Therefore, if the restaurant use is taken out, the proponent should be required to return to the Planning Commission and request a PUD Concept Amendment which would only be made if the develpers could demonstrate that they have been successful in implementing the design framework and that the change would not detract from the strcng overall image and uses desired for the Eden Glen PUD. 665 UNAPPROVED MINUTES Eden Prairie Planning Commission -10- March 14, 1988 F. EDEN PLACE CENTER ; by Prairie Entertainment Associates. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment and Zoning District Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser District on 6.42 acres and Preliminary Platting of 6.42 acres into 1 lot for construction of 52,000 square feet of retail and restaurant use. Location: West of Glen Lane, south and east of Eden Road. A public hearing. Franzen reported that the 1980 PUD depicted a mixture of office and retail. The new PUD has less office and more commercial, more fast-food restaurants than anticipated, and a slightly larger Class I sit-down restaurant. He introduced Brian Cluts as representative for the Developer. Proponent, in presenting the proposed project, stated the building would be all brick consisting of two kinds, a dark and light. There would be edge lighting, as well as under the canopy lighting giving a festive atmosphere. The architecture gives a front door appearance on the back of the building which would be on Eden Road. Tree replacement required would be 176 caliper inches. Franzen stated that the proposal was addressed in accordance with the City Council's concept of "Hometown Downtown," consisting of a specialized architecture, site planning, signage, lighting and landscaping unique to Eden Prairie. Franzen continued that the Staff was recommending approval of the PUD Concept Amendment, Zoning District Amendment and Preliminary Plat based on plans dated March 10, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 11, 1988, and the conditions set forth. He stated the Developer would supply a 5' wide sidewalk on Glen Lane and Eden Road to encourage pedestrian traffic. Schuck inquired to Staff if proposed screening was satisfactory. Franzen responded that the proposed method should provide effective screening. Schuck asked the percentage required for handicap parking spaces. Proponent responded it was 1 per 50. Anderson encouraged the plan for sidewalks to enhance pedestrian access. Don Brauer, 8042-8018 Eden Road, stated that Eden Road may be a service road, and if so, this would not be a feasible placement for a sidewalk. This would not be certain until the pattern was established for the Downtown. Eden Prairie Planning Commission -11- March 14, 1988 Franzen responded that the nevpimpo, re-mid o n to,- into A special assessment agreement with the Developer paying for the sidewalk if it does indeed go through. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Fell to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Prairie Entertainment Associates for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment to the Eden Glen Planned Unit Development for Eden Place Center, for construction of 52,000 sq. ft. of retail and restaurant uses, based on plans dated February 5, and February 26, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 11, 1988. Motion carried 6-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Prairie Entertainment Associates for Zoning District Amendment within the C-Regional-Service District on 6.42 acres for Eden Place Center, for construction of 52,000 sq. ft. of retail and restaurant uses, based on plans dated February 5, and February 26, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 11, 1988. Motion carried 6-0-0 MOTION 4: Notion was made by Bye and seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Prairie Entertainment Associates for Preliminary Plat of 6.42 acres into one lot for Eden Place Center for construction of 52,000 sq. ft. of retail and restaurant uses ; based on plans dated February 5, and February 26, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 11, 1988, and amended by Staff regarding sidewalks in the area. Motion carried 6-0-0 V. OLD BUSINESS None UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Mar. 21, 1988 -2- Richard asked for the definition of a scenic easement. Lambert said it is document filed with the County which says that the land will be maintained in its natural condition. MOTION: Baker moved to recommend approval of The Farm 2nd Addition per staff report with the addition of a scenic easement from the floodplain north. Shaw seconded the motion and it passed 7-0. B. Alpine Estates 2nd Addition Refer to staff report dated March 11, 1988. Krueger reviewed the site which is located east of Alpine Trail and south of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific railroad. The proposal is for 16 single family lots on 8.36 acres. Lambert said development has been proposed for this site several times before, but the original proposal for a townhouse development was rejected because of unacceptable land use and the next proposal for a single family development was dropped because 80,000 Cu. ft. of fill would have been required. Baker asked if the railroad will be abandoned. Lambert said it will not be abandoned in the near future. Cook asked what will be the closest park to this development. Lambert said it would be Round Lake Park. Baker asked if there would be any access to the creek valley. Lambert said no; however, there is a possibility further to the north. MOTION: Cook moved to recommend approval of Alpine Estates 2nd Addition per staff report. Mikkelson seconded the motion and it passed 7-0. C. Eden Place Center Refer to staff report dated March 11, 1988. Brian Klutz Was present at the meeting to review the proposal. The site is located at the intersection of Glen Lane and Eden Road and calls for a 52,000 sq. ft. retail center including a restaurant, offices and retail. There are some mature oaks on the restaurant side which will be maintained. Other trees that are removed will be replaced. Sidewalks are proposed to connect to peripheral sidewalks. 6934 UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PR ,,, IRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION ' Mar. 71. 1988 -3- Lambert said he has suggested that sidewalks be constructed on both Eden Road and Glen Lane along the entire parameter. Klutz said the developer has several concerns with putting sidewalks along both sides including the possibility of having to remove more trees to add sidewalks. Also the existence of a retaining wall will make it more difficult. Shaw asked what the advantages are of adding sidewalks at this point rather than waiting until later. Lambert said it is easier to construct sidewalks at this point before landscaping has been completed and it is more difficult to get the owner's approval for assessments later on. Joyer asked if sidewalks on both sides of the street will be required on all future developments. Lambert said all development south of Highway 5 in the "downtown" area will require this in the future although some will have to be added to existing developments. Klutz said another concern the developer has with constructing sidewalks is the 17' setback that is required by the City. He asked if sidewalks can be located in the right of way. Lambert said yes. MOTION: Shaw moved to recommend approval of Eden Place Center per staff recommendation. Richard seconded the motion and it passed 7-0. D. Golf Point Refer to staff report dated March 11, 1988. Tom Robertson was at the meeting representing Associated Investors. He reviewed the proposed development on the site which is located south of Valley View Road and east of the Chicago & Northwestern railroad. The plan calls for 15 townhouse units and depends upon the realignment of Valley View Road and whether the railroad is abandoned. There is a strong possibility that the situation with the railroad may remain the same as it was three months ago. The developer has agreed to construct sidewalks on the south side of Valley View Road. Lambert said about one-third of this site is within the Purgatory Creek Conservancy Area, but he recommends the conservancy requirement be waived since the natural character of Purgatory Creek in this area was changed by the construction of the golf course. He added that some of the land is located in the 100 year floodplain and should be either dedicated to the City or a scenic easement required. i2; Alpine Estates 2nd Addition CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 88-50 A RESOLUTION DENYING SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE #20-87 FOR THE PROPOSED CRESCENT RIDGE DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 20-83, authorizing first reading of a r e z o n i n g o f property for the proposed Crescent Ridge development, did re c e i v e f i r s t r e a d i n g b y the City Council at a regular meeting on May 5, 1987; and; WHEREAS, proponents for the development of Alpine Estates 2nd A d d i t i o n b y R . M. Feerick have not, since that date, completed the necessary s t e p s f o r f i n a l i z i n g the development as was reviewed by the City at the time of fir s t r e a d i n g ; a n d , WHEREAS, another proposal for development of the same pro p e r t y , k n o w n a s "Alpine Estates 2nd Addition," by the Red Rock Heights Partners h i p h a s b e e n r e v i e w e d and approved for the property and is requesting rezoning of t h e p r o p e r t y a c c o r d i n g to revised plans; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH E C I T Y O F E D E N PRAIRIE, that second reading of Ordinance #20-87 is hereby d e n i e d a n d t h a t t h e attendant request for Preliminary Plat of the Alpine Estate s 2 n d A d d i t i o n b y R . M . Feerick, is also hereby denied. ADOPTED by the City Council on April 5, 1988. Giry D.-Piterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #88-51 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ALPINE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION FOR RED ROCK HEIGHTS PARTNERSHIP BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Alpine Estates 2nd Addition for Red Rock Heights Partnership, dated March 3D, 1988, consisting of 8.4 acres into 16 single family lots and road right-of-way, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 5th day of April, 1988. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 606 A STAFF REPORT Planning Commission Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning March 11, 1988 Alpine Estates 2nd Addition East of Alpine Trail, south of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific railroad. Red Rock Heights Partnership 1. Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 8.36 acres. 2. Preliminary Plat of 8.36 acres into 16 single family lots for the construction of 15 single family homes. TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: PROJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: REQUEST: • - 41-83 81-9.5 Background This property, Outlot 2, Alpine Estates, is currently zoned R1-22 and guided for Low Density Resi- dential land uses. The Compre- hensive Guide Plan depicts surround- ing areas as Low Density Residential with current zoning classifications 79-21 including R1-13.5 to the north, R1- // 62 -84 22 to the south and west, and Rural PROPOSED srrEIL PUR I arid floodplain to the east. This property has been subject of a r,7, great deal of controversy over the ' past three years. The original proposal for this site was a townhouse development which utilized the existing natural site character- istics but was unacceptable from a land use standpoint. The next proposal for this parcel of land was for a single family residential MiTi. development; however, due to the design of the project, a total of approximately 80,000 cubic yards of fill was required and sanitary sewer had to be extended approximately 900 VI.Z.,;,tiaMet,g11 AREA, LocA-riorupp. Alpine Estates 2nd Addition 2 March 11, 1988 feet to service the property. This amount of fill and length of sanitary sewer extension did not prove to be cost effective and the project was dropped. The most recent proposal was for 14 single family lots which was not presented by the developer for final approval by the City Council. Site Plan/Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat depicts the subdivision of the 8.36-acre tract into 16 single family lots. Lot sizes range from a minimum of 13,950 square feet to a maximum of 37,631 square feet and averaging approximately 20,427 square feet. All of the lots meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the R1-13.5 zoning district with the exception of Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 1, which will require a variance from the 150- foot lot depth required for residential lots adjacent to railroads to 125 feet and Lot 6, Block 2, which does not meet the minimum average width requirement. Because of the unique shape of the property, and the extenuating circumstances, a variance for lot depth may be substantiated in this particular case. Access to this site is being provided by the extension of Alpine Trail to the east approximately 900 feet. The proposed right-of-way for Alpine Trail is 50 feet. In order for this roadway extension to service the adjacent property to the east, the road would be extended an additional 500 feet and terminate in a cul-de-sac. Any further extension of this road would require a Purgatory Creek crossing, which is unlikely. Grading The natural topography of this site slopes in a southeasterly direction towards Purgatory Creek from high points existing along the ncrth edge of the property. These points range in elevation from 936 in the northeast comer to a low point elevation of 848, a difference in elevation of approximately 80 feet. Natural slopes range from approximately 2% adjacent to the Purgatory Creek floodplain to a high of approximately 43%. Because there are slopes greater than 12% and an elevation difference of over 30 feet, a steep slope review is required concurrent with the development review. In comparison with the previously approved single family plan, the overall grading as proposed is less damaging to the natural site characteristics of the property. A maximum of 20 feet of cut is occuring within Lot 2, Block 1, with fill reaching a maximum of 14 feet on Lot 2, Block 2. A total of approximately 21,000+ cubic yards of fill is required to complete the grading as proposed. Based on this figure, approximately 1,400 loads of fill will be moved onto the site using Hillerest Lane and Alpine Trail. In order to guarantee the maintenance and possible reconstruction of the roads, the proponent will be required to evaluate the road's condition before and after the importation of fill and to restore any deterioration that occurs. Bonding requirements for the grading permit will reflect the potential for damages to the residential streets. This program of pavement evaluation before and after hauling operations will require that the importation of fill be confined to a limited period of time. It is suggested that the impertation of fill materials be limited to a period of 90 days from issuance of the grading permit. In order for development to occur on Lots 5, 6, and 7, Block 1, a 'Series of retaining walls are being proposed ranging in size from a single, 4-foot wall to a series of four, 4 .-foot retaining walls. The proponent has developed a conceptual plan which depicts how these walls will work with typical building pads. Because of :01/ Alpine Estates 2nd Addition 3 March 11, 1988 the extensive retaining wali failure and damage to homes as a result of past rain storms, concern has been raised regarding the approval of building pads which rely heavily on the use of retaining walls. Retaining wall failure can be a result of poor construction; however, poor soil conditions and poor drainage (where flows over the top of the retaining wall, or poor drainage which allows the soil behind the wall to become saturated, thus exerting additional weight which causes the wall to collapse) have been identified as the major causes for retaining wall failure. In order for Staff to properly review the proposal, a detailed grading and retaining wall plan must be sutmitted. This plan shall be submitted prior to City Council review. The proponent has indicated that Lots 5-7 will not be part of the mass grading due to the amount of retaining wall construction required. At the time of building permit issuance for these lots, any changes from the approved plans will require Engineering Staff approval. A significant amount of discussion centered around the use of retaining walls on the Bluestem Hills 4th Addition. Staff recomended that the proposed retaining walls be constructed ccncurrent with site grading and street construction. In this particular case, the recommendation was based on the following factors: 1) Protect building foundations. 2) Protect and preserve the natural character of the site adjacent Purgatory Creek. 3) Protection of public health, safety, and welfare. 4) Indicate to potential builders and owners the extent to which a home could be built. 5) Poor soil conditions. Although the construction of the retaining walls concurrent with grading is preferable, the alternative for this site is acceptable based upon: 1) Limited number of lots which rely on retaining walls. 2) Retaining walls are response to past concerns over grading of the hill. 3) House not relying cn retaining wall for structural support becauseelf uphill slope. 4) Soils are more stable than those adjacent Purgatory Creek. 5) Grading and retaining walls are to be designed prior to Council review. 6) Less expensive area than Bluestem Hills. A 40-foot building pal should be large enough to accommodate a home adjacent the hill. 7) Much smaller drainage area contributory to the retaining wall area. 6,04 Alpine Estates 2nd Addition 4 March 11, 19:: Uti I ities Water and sanitary sewer services are available to this site. Water service is proposed by the extension of an eight-inch water line within the Alpine Trail right- of-way. Sanitary sewer is proposed to be extended from the 60-inch sanitary sewer trunk line located east of the subject property across Purgatory Creek to the site. The developer has agreed to pay all costs for the extension of the sanitary sewer to the property. As the plans indicate, an easement for the sanitary sewer extension and a typical development plan has been shown for the Anderson property. The proponent has reached an agreement with Mr. Anderson for this easement which will be required prior to the release of the final plat. The proponent has submitted a signed Right-of-Entry form for both the sanitary sewer and cul-de-sac. No development shall occur on any of the lots until sanitary sewer service is available. There is an existing 20-foot drainage and utility easement which extends north/south through the subject property designed primarily to capture run-off from the property to the north. The proponent has designed a storm sewer system with catch basins located in the extension of Alpine Trail with the ultimate discharge into the Purgatory Creek floodplain. The storm sewer located between Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, shall be extended to the north to connect to the existing drain culvert. Tree Inventory/Tree Replacement A total of 1,243 diameter inches of trees are located on this property. The proposed grading plan depicts the removal of 222 diameter inches of trees. The Tree Preservation Policy requires the replacement of 136 caliper inches of plant material. A reforestation plan will be required prior to Council review. STAFF RECCMMENDAT I ON S Staff would recommend approval of the request for Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 and Preliminary Plat of 8.36 acres into 16 lots based upon plans dated February 16, 19::, revised plans dated March 10, 1988, the reconmerrlations of the Staff Report, dated March 11, 1988, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: A. Subnit a reforestation plan depicting a total of 136 caliper irches of plant material. B. Revise the plans to reflect the required average lot width for Lot 5, Block 2. C. Revise the preliminary plat to reflect a drainage and utility easement along the rear of Lot 4-6, 8, and 9, Block 2. D. Submit a detailed grading ard retaining wall plan for Lots 5-7, Block 1, which depicts how the grading ties into the mass grading and drainage plan. Any changes at building permit issuance will -, require Engineering Staff approval. E. Revise the utility plan to reflect a storm sewer connection between the proposed systffn and the drain culvert to the north. Alpine Estates 2nd Addition 5 March 11, 19 2. Prior to Final Plat, proporent shall: A. Submit a detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed storm water run-off, utility, and erosion control plans for review by the Engineering Department. C. Submit permanent easements for the cul-de-sac and sanitary sewer line extension. 3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Pay the Cash Park Fee. B. Submit detailed grading and retaining walls plans for Lots 5-7, Block 1, for review. 4. Prior to Grading permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. B. Stake the construction limits with erosion control fencing. C. Stake the grading limits with a snow fence. Any trees lost outside the proposed grading limits shall be replaced on a cross-sectional trunk area inch per area irch basis. D. Determine the condition of and submit a bond for the mainterence of Hillcrest Court and Alpine Trail which is the designated construction route. 5. No development shall occur on any of the lots until sanitary sewer service is available. 6. Apply for, and receive, a variance from the Board of Appeals for lot depth adjacent to railroads of 150 feet for Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 1. UNAPPROVED MINUTES Eden Prairie Planning Commiss i o n -2- March 14, 1988 B. ALPINE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION , by Red Rock Heights Partnership. Request for Zon i n g D i s t r i c t C h a n g e f r o m R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 8.4 acres w i t h l o t d e p t h v a r i a n c e s to be reviewed by the Board o f A p p e a l s , P r e l i m i n a r y Platting of 8.4 acres into 16 s i n g l e f a m i l y l o t s a n d road right-of-way. Location: E a s t o f A l p i n e T r a i l , South of Chicago, Milwaukee, S t . P a u l & P a c i f i c Railroad. A public hearing. Uram introduced proponent Bil l G i l k a n d J e r v e l l H a l m r a s t . He stated the property had be e n b r o u g h t b e f o r e t h e C o m m i s s i o n two other times over the past f e w y e a r s , a n d t h e p r o p o s e d development would be feasible i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h S t a f f Recommendations dated March 1 1 , 1 9 8 8 . Proponent presented the propo s e d d e v e l o p m e n t o f 1 6 s i n g l e family lots. All the lots me e t o r e x c e e d t h e m i n i m u m requirements of the zoning d i s t r i c t w i t h t h e e x c e p t i o n o f Lots 3, 4 and 5 on Block 1. Proponent h a s a p p l i e d f o r a variance from 150 foot lot d e p t h r e q u i r e d f o r r e s i d e n t i a l lots adjacent to railroads to 1 2 5 f e e t , a n d L o t 6 , B l o c k 2 which does not meet the minim u m a v e r a g e w i d t h r e q u i r e m e n t . He stated that an agreement w i t h M r . A n d e r s o n h a d b e e n reached for an easement throu g h h i s p r o p e r t y f o r s a n i t a r y sewer extension. They have su b m i t t e d a s i g n e d R i g h t - o f - E n t r y form for the sanitary sewer a n d c u l - d e - s a c . 6:2\ Eden Prairie Planning Commission -3- March 14, 1988 Proponent continucd that tree replacement would c o n s i s t o f 136 caliper inches of plant material to replace t h e r e m o v a l of 222 diameter inches of trees. Access to this site would be provided by the exte n s i o n o f Alpine Trail to the east for approximately 900 f e e t . T h e proposed grading would be less damaging to the na t u r a l s i t e characteristics of the property. Approximately 2 1 , 0 0 0 + c u b i c yards of fill are required to complete the gradi n g . T h i s amount of fill would required 1400 loads of fill t o b e m o v e d onto the site using Hillcrest Lane and Alpine Tra i l . Assistant Planner Uram reported that the major is s u e i n t h e past was the grading. In the proposal being subm i t t e d , f i l l would be brought in to raise the site elevation. I n o r d e r t o guarantee the maintenance and possible reconstruc t i o n o f t h e roads, the proponent would be required to evalu a t e t h e r o a d ' s condition before and after the hauling of the fil l , a n d t o restore any deterioration that occurs. He stated t h a t t h e hauling of fill be confined to a limited period o f t i m e , a n d suggested a limitation of 90 days from issuance o f t h e grading permit. Uram continued that a series of retaining walls w e r e b e i n g proposed and that the walls be constructed conc u r r e n t w i t h home construction. Uram summarized the items on the Staff Recommend a t i o n R e p o r t that were necessary at this time as: 1) Revise t h e p l a n s t o reflect the required average lot width for Lot 5 , B l o c k 2 ; 2) Determine the condition of and submit a bond f o r t h e maintenance of Hillcrest Court and Alpine Trail w h i c h w o u l d be the designated construction route; and 3) App l y f o r a n d receive a variance from the Board of Appeals for l o t d e p t h adjacent to railroads of 150 feet for Lots 3, 4, a n d 5 , Block 1. Bye observed that with the size of the trucks, a n d t h e i m p a c t on residents, perhaps the hauling be detained du r i n g s c h o o l bus traffic time. Uram responded that could be a consideration. Fell inquired if 900 ft. length included the cul- d e - s a c . Proponent responded affirmatively. Dodge asked if there was a plan to connect that r o a d . U r a m responded it had been looked at, however, extendi n g i t a c r o s s Purgatory Creek did not look probable due to the c o s t . Eden Prairie Planning Commission -4- March 14, 1988 Franzen mentioned that the Director ot Community Services Lambert received this proposal and felt a trail system was not necessary in this area. Norman Woodard, 16180 Hillcrest Lane, stated that access into the property was not Hillcrest Road but rather Hillcrest Lane. Proponent requested that a restriction on the time of day not be placed on the project as the trucks are rented by the day and they wanted to be able to haul all they could in a given day. Dram replied that when Staff worked on the grading section, the suggestion of 90 days was a reasonable solution, but perhaps 120 days would be more reasonable. Dwight Harvey, 16190 Alpine Way, stated that Hillcrest Lane was the main pickup for school children. He asked if it would be marked that it was a construction area. Uram stated this could be made a requirement. Franzen commented that a sign could be installed stating the unloading and loading time for the school buses for the haulers to be aware of what time of the day children and buses would be in the area. The developer would pay for the sign and the City would erect it. Dodge inquired to proponent what the anticipated cost of the lots would be. Proponent replied in the $40,000 range. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Anderson to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Anderson to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Red Rock Heights Partnership for Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 for 8.4 acres for Alpine Estates 2nd Addition, with lot depth variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, based on revised plans dated March 8, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 11, 1988, with the addition of 1.F. Review the possibility of a trail system; and 1.G. That Council would work out a method of signage and speed limit to lessen the impact of the construction. Motion carried 6-0-0 Eden Prairie Planning Commission -5- March 14, 1988 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Anderson to re c o m m e n d to the City Council approval of the request of Red R o c k Heights Partnership for Preliminary Plat of 8.4 acr e s i n t o 1 6 single family lots and road right-of-way for Alpine E s t a t e s 2nd Addition, based on revised plans dated March 8, 1 9 8 8 , subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report d a t e d March 11, 1988, and as amended by the previous motio n . Motion carried 6-0-0 UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Mar. 21, 1988 -2 - Richard asked for the definition of a scenic easement. Lambert said it is document filed with the County which says that the land will be maintained in its natural condition. MOTION: Baker moved to recommend approval of The Farm 2nd Addition per staff report with the addition of a scenic easement from the floodplain north. Shaw seconded the motion and it passed 7-0. Alpine Estates 2nd Addition Refer to staff report dated March 11, 1988. Krueger reviewed the site which is located east of Alpine Trail and south of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific railroad. The proposal is for 16 single family lots on 8.36 acres. Lambert said development has been proposed for this site several times before, but the original proposal for a townhouse development was rejected because of unacceptable land use and the next proposal for a single family development was dropped because 80,000 Cu. ft. of fill would have been required. Baker asked if the railroad will be abandoned. Lambert said it will not be abandoned in the near future. Cook asked what will be the closest park to this development. Lambert said it would be Round Lake Park. Baker asked if there would be any access to the creek valley. Lambert said no; however, there is a possibility further to the north. MOTION: Cook moved to recommend approval of Alpine Estates 2nd Addition per staff report. Mikkelson seconded the motion and it passed 7-0. C. Eden Place Center Refer to staff report dated March 11, 1988. Brian Klutz Was present at the meeting to review the proposal. The site is located at the intersection of Glen Lane and Eden Road and calls for a 52,000 sq. ft. retail center including a restaurant, offices and retail. There are some mature oaks on the restaurant side which will be maintained. Other trees that are removed will be replaced. Sidewalks are proposed to connect to peripheral sidewalks. APRIL 5,1988 41294 41295 41296 I 297 298 41299 41300 41301 41302 41303 41304 41305 41306 41307 41308 41309 41310 41311 41312 41313 41314 41315 41316 41317 41318 41319 41320 41321 41322 i 323 ,4324 41325 41326 41327 41328 41329 41330 41331 41332 41333 41334 41335 41336 41337 41338 41339 41340 41341 41342 41343 41344 41345 41346 41347 '348 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE CROW WING COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES FEDERAL RESERVE BANK NORWEST BANK HOPKINS GREAT WEST Luc ASSURANCE CO GUARANTEE MUTUAL LIFE CO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR -PERA ICMA RETIREMENT CORP INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - PERA PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN OF MN UNITED WAY BEER WHOLESALERS INC COCA BOTTLING CO DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING MARK VII DISTRIBUTING MAYO DISTRIBUTING PEPSI COLA BOTTLING GROUP ROYAL CROWN BEVERAGE COMPANY THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY TWIN CITY HOME JUICE CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION JOHN FRANE J ROBERT NYGREN JAMES E FORD RICHARD J RUPPERT AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION JOHN ANGELIS ERIN ANDREWS ANOKA TECHNICAL INSTITUTE JOSEPH ASSELEMEIER ALICIA BROZOVICH DOROTHY CARR CENTRAL DISTRICT WATER OPERATOR' MATTHEW CHELIKOWSKY TODD CHELIKOWSKY CRAGUN'S CONFERENCE CENTER ANN DANIELSON THE HAMPSHIRE HOTEL HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC RICHARD JOAS JULI HEDTKE ANDREW KITCHAR SANDY KNAAK TIM LEHMAN KAREN MCMULLEN MINNESOTA AQUATIC CONFERENCE MINNESOTA GFOA SHELLEY NAMTVEDT NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES NORTH CENTRAL SECTION AWWA PAYROLL 3/4/88 CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION PAYROLL 3/4/88 PAYROLL 2/19/88 & 3/4/88 PAYROLL 3/4/88 PAYROLL 3/4/88 APRIL 88 LIFE INSURANCE PAYROLL 3/4/88 UNION DUES FOR MARCH 88 PAYROLL 3/4/88 MARCH 88 LIFE INSURANCE PAYROLL 3/4/88 PAYROLL 3/4/88 PAYROLL 3/4/88 BEER MIX BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER MIX MIX BEER MIX PAYROLL 3/4/88 JANUARY & FEBRUARY 88 EXPENSES LEGAL SERVICE LEGAL SERVICE LEGAL SERVICE CONFERENCE-PLANNING DEPT REFUND-EXERCISE CLASS REFUND-AQUA AEROBICS CONFERENCE-FIRE DEPT REFUND-SKATING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-RACQUETBALL LESSONS S CONFERENCE-WATER DEPT REFUND-SKATING LESSONS REFUND-SKATING LESSONS CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS EXPENSES-COUNCILMEMBERS CONFERENCE-COMMUNITY CENTER REFUND-MEMBERSHIP REFUND-SKATING LESSONS REFUND-MEMBERSHIP REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SKATING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS CONFERENCE-COMMUNITY CENTER DUES-FINANCE DEPT REFUND-SKATING LESSONS CONFERENCE-CITY COUNCILMEMBERS CONFERENCE-WATER DEPT 12424.19 252.00 46923.08 900.00 3901.00 2254.33 90.00 1305.80 874.00 11347.50 2591.65 23800.16 15935.78 214.50 4286.80 354.75 4557.90 8852.40 216.05 10834.72 110.00 419.00 101.20 10702.65 27.30 1027.00 400.00 463.20 472.00 469.80 333.00 14.00 27.00 900.00 26.00 30.00 56.00 52.00 15.86 15.86 123.73 30.00 227.80 75.00 135.00 26.00 115.00 24.00 20.00 3.00 130.00 10.00 26.00 150.00 505.00 16917901 APRIL 5,1988 41349 JAMES PEDRIC REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 10.00 41350 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 12.42 ..41351 KARLN SIMPSON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 20.00 ip52 PAULA SOLIE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 34.00 15.1353 JOANN SYVERSON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 12.00 41354 DEBRA VOSS-GRUMISH REFUND-SKATING LESSONS 47.00 41355 WOMEN IN LEISURE SERVICE CONFERENCE-COMMUNITY SERVICES 30.00 41356 GEORGE BENTLEY EXPENSES-CITY COUNCILMEMBER 200.00 41357 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR PERMIT-PARK DEPT 50.00 41358 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR PERMIT-PARK DEPT 50.00 41359 GARY PETERSON EXPENSES-CITY COUNCILMEMBER 200.00 41360 STATE REGISTER & PUBLIC DOCUMENT -4 MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE BOOKS-BUIL D I N G 52.64 DEPT 41361 MINNESOTA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 72.40 41362 MATT'S AUTO SERVICE INC TOWING-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 193.00 41363 JOHN E CARLON III LICENSE FEE-SEWER DEPT 30.00 41364 JIM SIMCHUCK LICENSE FEE-SEWER DEPT 30.00 41365 CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION BOILER OPERATOR CERTIFICATION/FEES PAID 20.00 41366 MTI DISTRIBUTING COMPANY CONFERENCE-PARK MAINTENANCE 120.00 41367 NORWEST BANK HOPKINS PAYROLL 3/18/88 450.00 41368 STATE TREASURER OPERATING EXPENSES-SEWER DEPT 15.00 41369 ST PAUL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOP INST SCHOOLS-POLICE DEPT 300.00 41370 TODD WALTERS REFUND-LICENSE FEE 15.00 41371 MINNESOTA DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY -REGISTRATION FEE FOR SQUAD CARS-POLICE 80.75 DEPT 41372 AT&T SERVICE 775.41 41373 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 1300.00 41374 AT&T COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 19.49 4 1375 B R W INC -SERVICE-COLUMBINE ROAD FEASIBILITY/DELL 8751.91 -ROAD/EVENER WAY FEASIBILITY/VALLEY VIEW ROAD/MITCHELL TO COUNTY RD 4 41376 MINNEGASCO SERVICE 41377 NORTHWESTERN BELL SERVICE 41378 U S WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE 41379 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER LICENSE FEE-COMMUNITY CENTER 41380 JULIE KERSSEN REFUND-SKATING LESSONS 41381 JANICE KIDD REFUND-SKATING LESSONS 41382 LYNNE MERRICK REFUND-SKATING LESSONS 41383 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 41384 JACKIE PETERS REFUND-SPRING LEISURE PROGRAM 41385 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS 41386 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA INC APRIL 88 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 41387 CRAGUNS CONFERENCE CENTER CONFERENCE-WATER DEPT 41388 MARY JO ECKERT REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 41389 HEIDI GLOVER REFUND-RACQUETBALL CLASSES 41390 PETTY CASH EXPENSES-CITY HALL 41391 HENNEPIN CO FIRE CHIEFS ASSN 1988 DUES-FIRE DEPT 41392 WASHINGTON CAPITAL SUBSCRIPTION-FIRE DEPT 41393 NORTHWESTERN BELL SERVICE 41394 CITY OF BROOKLYN PARK MUNICI-PALS SPRING BANQUET-CITY HALL 41395 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL INSTITUTE CONFERENCE-BUILDING DEPT 41396 NAIL BUSINESSWOMEN'S LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE-COMMUNITY CENTER 41397 VOID OUT CHECK 41398 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS 1 99 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC CONFERENCE-STREET DEPT 2581806 6362.74 3528.38 190.22 330.00 13.00 12.72 13.71 103.38 5.00 15.75 656.81 312.50 16.50 28.00 57.96 10.00 72.00 682.67 208.95 178.00 59.00 0.00 9.75 60.00 i APRIL 5,1988 CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES 6.00 CONFERENCE-STREET DEPT 150.00 SERVICE 118.15 CONFERENCE-WATER DFPT 10.00 REFUND-SPRING LEISURE PROGRAM 5.00 REFUND-AQUA AEROBICS 21.00 SERVICE 103.32 SERVICE 28415.27 REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 13.00 REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 34.00 DUES-PLANNING DEPT 15.00 EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 37.97 MUNICI-PALS SPRING BANQUET 9.95 PAYROLL 3/18/88 12220.59 CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTIONS 252.00 AEROBIC TAPES-FITNESS CLASSES 26.95 PAYROLL 3/18/88 46484.11 LIQUOR 8306.08 PAYROLL 3/18/88 3901.00 PAYROLL 3/18/88 1325.80 WINE 10000.89 SERVICE 80.00 SERVICE 70.24 SERVICE 5253.14 WINE 534.50 PAYROLL 3/18/88 23514.68 LIQUOR 6878.44 WINE 2191.58 PAYROLL 3/18/88 214.50 PAYROLL 3/18/88 936.00 WINE 7.08 LEASE AGREEMENT FOR POLICE COPIER 600.00 -DUES-PARKS RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES 205.00 DEPARTMENT WINE 8.97 POSTAGE-VALUATION NOTICES-ASSESSING DEPT 2756.67 PARTIAL PAYMENT-ICE SHOW COSTUMES 1200.00 FEBRUARY 88 LEGAL SERVICE 6007.50 CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 130.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL-COMMUNITY CENTER 42.74 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1781.36 REBOLT DOOR/ELECTRIC ARM-COMMUNITY CENTER 94.53 BATTERIES•POLICE DEPT 90.48 STEEL BLADES/BITS-PARK DEPT 94.81 VCR TAPE PLAYER-COMMUNITY SERVICES 365.00 DUES-PLANNING DEPT COMPUTER SOFTWARE-WATER DEPT STREET SIGNS-STREET DEPT FLOWERS-POLICE DEPT -INSTALL DEADBOLT/REKEY CYLINDER TO MASTER SYSTEM-FIRE DEPT NUTS & BOLTS/SWITCH/GAUGE-EQUIPMENT MAINT -REPAIR WINDOW MOTOR DAMPER/INSTALL DRYER RECEPTACLE/INSPECT WATER HEATER-WATER DEPT 0.00 153.00 690.00 1411.15 38.25 0.00 128.80 46.33 542.23 41400 SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COU 41401 AMERCIAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSN 1402 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV 403 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC •41.404 ELIZABETH ERICKSON 41405 JUDIE FRENCH 41406 NORTHWESTERN BELL 41407 NSP 41408 LINDA STANSBURG 41409 KIMBERLY SULLIVAN 41410 TC RUG 41411 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT 41412 CITY OF BROOKLYN PARK 41413 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 41414 CROW WING COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES 41415 DANCE TRACKS 41416 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK 41417 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC 41418 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO 41419 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP 41420 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR 41421 MINNESOTA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO 41422 NORTHWESTERN BELL 41423 NSP 41424 PAUSTIS & SONS CO 41425 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA 41426 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO 41427 QUALITY WINE CO "1 428 UNITED WAY 429 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 41430 THE WINE COMPANY 41431 INTERNATIONAL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC 41432 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC 41433 THE WINE COMPANY 41434 U S POSTMASTER 41435 SIMPLE BEGINNINGS 41436 GRANT MERRITT & ASSOCIATES LTD 41437 NUTSHELL PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGY 41438 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER 41439 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC 41440 AIRLIFT DOORS INC 41441 ALEXANDER BATTERY NORTH 41442 ALLEN COMPANY 41443 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO 41444 VOID OUT CHECK 41445 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 41446 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC 41447 EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOC INC 41448 ANDERSON'S GARDEN 41449 VOID OUT CHECK 41450 ARMOR SECURITY INC 41451 ASTLEFORD INTL INC 152 BACON'S ELECTRIC CO 16752306 CHAPEL HILL ACADEMY CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO CHERMAK REFRIGERATION CO INC JAMES CLARK CLIMATE MAKERS INC SCOTT COLE COMMERCIAL TIRE & SERVICE CENTER COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION JOYCE CONLEY CONTACT MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INC 41453 PAT BARKER 41454 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC 41455 KELLY BAUER 41456 BENTEC ENGINEERING CORP 40.1457 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 41458 BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY 41459 BLACK & VEATCH 41460 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 41461 BLOOMINGTON LOCK & SAFE CO 41462 BMS/OFFICE STORES INC-SERVICE 41463 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS 41464 RICK BOLINSKE 41465 DAVE BRANDELL 41466 LEE BRANDT 41467 ANDREA BROSCH 41468 BSC MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 41469 BSN CORP 41470 FRANCIE BUTORAC 41471 DUANE CABLE 41472 CAPITOL SALES COMPANY INC 41473 DAN CARLSON 41474 CARLSONS LAKE STATE EQUIP CO 41475 41476 41477 41478 ( 179 ..480 41481 41482 41483 41484 41485 CMI REFRIGERATION 41486 COPY EQUIPMENT INC 41487 DAVID A CORNELIUS 41488 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS INC 41489 CREDIT BUREAU OF MPLS/ST PAUL 41490 CROWN MARKING INC 41491 CRYSTAPLEX PLASTICS INC 41492 CURTIS INDUSTRIES 41493 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY 41494 WARD DAHLBERG 41495 DALCO EXPENSES-AWARDS PROGRAM -BATTERIES/WINDSHIELD WASHER FLUID/POWER STEERING FLUID/CLAMPS/SPARK PLUGS VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID -INSTALLATION & PROGRAMMING OF DIALERS AT LIFT STATION-SEWER 0F.PT SERVICE-CITY HALL -FILM PROCESSING-COMMUNITY SERVICES/POLICE DEPT/FORESTRY DEPT/FIRE DEPT/ENGR DEPT SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDITION SERVICE-JANUARY 88 LOCK REPAIR-P/S BUILDING MAINTANANCE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT SERVICE-SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY MILEAGE REFUND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS PREPAY HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID RACQUETBALL INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID WATER HEATER REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER SOCCER NETS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT ANTENNA FOR SQUAD CARS-POLICE DEPT EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT -FUEL PUMP/SCREWS/INJECTION NOZZLE/RADIO -REPAIRS/ANTI-FREEZE/GASKET KIT/WASHERS/ SLEEVE FITTINGS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE REFUND-WATER & SEWER BILL LEGAL ADS-PARK & RECREATION DEPT REPAIR WATER COOLER-SENIOR CENTER EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT EQUIPMENT REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER SKIDDER RENTAL-FORESTRY DEPT 20 TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SERVICE-TH 169 FROM LEONA RD TO CO RD 39 EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT -TWO RADIOS/TWO BATTERIES/TWO CHARGERS- POLICE DEPT/RADIO REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINT -BEARINGS/SEAL/COUPLING-COMMUNITY CENTER SUPPLIES-PLANNING DEPT BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID MARCH 88 INSURANCE CONSULTANT REPORTS-POLICE DEPT SUPPLIES-CITY HALL PLEXIGLASS SHIELDS-COMMUNITY CENTER KEYS/DRILL BITS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT FEBRUARY 88 EXPENSES -CLEANING SUPPLIES/CARPET TOOL/PIN -ASSEMBLY DISCONNECT-COMMUNITY CENTER/ -VACUUM & ACCESSORIES $358.00-SENIOR -CENTER/FLOOR MACHINE $858.00/STEEL COUPLING-WATER DEPT 11.00 375.62 202.50 565.20 655.50 251.34 10958.07 795.00 62.00 74.00 160.00 139.50 4023.69 354.50 154.00 124.00 1618.98 50.00 5.29 216.00 7.00 769.17 243.40 161.50 83.50 12.00 65.00 350.00 1210.68 1180.97 50.00 2923.20 152.80 9.78 420.00 455.00 14.00 39.50 357.50 293.92 4970.00 80.00 2651.02 3729613 APRIL 5,1988 41519 FINA COSTUMES 41520 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN 41521 VOID OUT CHECK 41522 STUART FOX ( 523 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY -,1524 LYNDELL FREY 41525 G & K SERVICES 41526 GAB BUSINESS SERVICE INC 41527 DARRELL GEDNEY 41528 VOID OUT CHECK 41529 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC 41530 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPANY 41531 GETTING TO KNOW YOU 41532 JOSEPH GLEASON 41533 GOPHER OIL COMPANY 41534 GREATER MPLS DAY CARE ASSOC 41535 VOID OUT CHECK 41536 W W GRAINGER INC 41537 GROSS OFFICE SUPPLY 41538 GSC SPORTS INC 41539 GTE DIRECTORIES SERVICE CORP 41540 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC 41541 GUNS & AMMO 41542 C F HAGLIN & SONS CO 41543 MICHAEL HAMILTON "544 HANDY-CRAFTS INC SERVICE-RESEARCH ROAD/FLOOD DAMAGE MILEAGE & MEETING EXPENSES SERVICE-EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER-HUMAN RESOURCE MILEAGE-LIQUOR STORE SERVICE-APRIL 88 EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE-WATER DEPT SCHOOL-FINANCE DEPT CHLORINE-WATER DEPT DIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID SERVICE-OLYMPIC HILLS DRAINAGE CONTROL EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER SCREWS/COTTER PINS/END BRUSH-WATER DEPT EXPENSES-CITY HALL CONFERENCE-FIRE DEPT REIMBURSEMENT FOR STATE GRANT FEBRUARY 88 WATER TESTS SERVICE -MOTOR/BLOWER FANS/HEATER ELEMENT- COMMUNITY CENTER MARCH 88 EXPENSES CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT -CLOCK/TERMINALS/CONNECTORS/SNOWPLOW KIT- EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE COSTUMES-COMMUNITY CENTER CONFERENCE-FIRE DEPT SERVICE-PLEASANT HILL CEMETERY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES MILEAGE TOWELS-LIQUOR STORE LIABILITY INSURANCE HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID RADIO REPAIRS-FIRE DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINT TABLES FOR OUTDOOR CENTER-PARKS DEPT ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES HOCKEY & BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID OIL-COMMUNITY CENTER EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES SPROCKET/SPRAY GUN-PARK MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT WALLYBALL NETS-PARK & RECREATION DEPT ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORE -RELAY COIL-COMMUNITY CENTER/AERIAL LADDER -AND LITE ADJUSTMENT-PARK MAINTENANCE/ -INSTALLATION OF QUARTZ LITE & SWITCH ON -5 LIFT STATION CONTROL PANELS-$1700.00- SEWER DEPT SUBSCRIPTION-POLICE DEPT SERVICE-REPAIR COMMUNITY CENTER BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID PLASTER MOLDS-RECREATION PROGRAMS 41496 DAVES FLOOR SANDING INST INC 41497 CRAIG DAWSON 41498 MONICA M DAY 11 1499 MITCHELL J DEAN 1500 DECORATIVE DESIGNS 41501 STATE OF MINNESOTA 41502 LYNDA DIEDE 41503 DIXIE PETRO-CHEM INC 41504 BILL DOLNY 41505 DON EVE & SONS 41506 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU 41507 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU 41508 DYNA SYSTEMS 41509 E P ROBINS DELI 41510 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPT 41511 EDEN PRAIRIE SNOWDRIFTERS 41512 VOID OUT CHECK 41513 CITY OF EDINA 41514 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 41515 ELECTRIC-AIRE CORPORATION 41516 CHRIS ENGER 41517 FEED RITE CONTROLS INC 41518 FEIST-BLANCHARD CO 2990.00 48.00 123.00 10.00 49.50 40.00 109.30 799.00 67.50 400.00 33.00 418.00 95.65 27.00 510.00 1134.08 0.00 76.00 17430.00 279.00 200.00 1060.00 707.33 705.90 240.00 0.00 1100.00 516.03 104.50 20.68 732.73 102.00 0.00 153.43 467.16 90.00 293.00 23.07 20.00 0.00 86.55 285.31 212.30 194.60 1857.98 14.94 51666.30 140.00 67.83 8570067 APRIL 5,1988 41545 HANSEN THORP PELL1NEN OLSON INC -SERVICE-BLUFF S E A S T 4 T H A D D I T I O N / -SUNNYBROOK ROAD/INTL SCHOOL WATERMAIN/ NEMEC KNOLLS/FRANLO RD/HAMILTON RD II 546 HARMON GLASS -TINTED WINDSHIELD/PLEXIGLASS FOR AIR COMPRESSOR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 41547 JEAN L HARRIS EXPENSES-CITY COUNCILMEMBER 41548 HAUENSTEIN & BURMEISTER INC BATH DOORS-HOMEWARD HILLS PARK SHELTER 41549 ROGER HAWKINSON BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 41550 HAYDEN MURPHY EQUIPMENT CO VALVE ASSEMBLY/HOSE/LINKS-EQUIPMENT MAINT 41551 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLICE SCHOOLS-POLICE D E P T 41552 HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF POSTAGE-VOTER REGISTRATION VERIFICATION 41553 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT FEBRUARY 88 BOOKING FEE-POLICE DEPT 41554 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER FEBRUARY 88 WASTE DISPOSAL-FORESTRY DEPT 41555 HENNEPIN COUNTY JANUARY 88 BOARD OF PRISONERS 41556 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS FILING FEES-ENGINEERING DEPT 41557 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER PROPERTY OWNERS LIST-PLANNING DEPT 41558 HEWLETT PACKARD SUBSCRIPTION-FINANCE DEPT 41559 HEALTH & HOME ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORE 41560 D C HEY COMPANY INC SERVICE 41561 HOFFERS INC PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE 41562 HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC -RELAY CONTROL/CLEANING SUPPLIES/OIL/ -BELT/FLOAT SWITCH HEAD/TUBE ASSEMBLY/ COMPRESSOR KIT-COMMUNITY CENTER 41563 HONEYWELL PROTECTION -2ND QTR 88 SECURITY SERVICE-LIQUOR STORE/ SENIOR CENTER 41564 HOPKINS PLUMBING & HEATING CO INC -GATE VALVE/COP P E R T U B I N G / H A N G E R S / P I P E - DRAINS-PARK DEPT 41565 HORNET FOUNDATION SCHOOLS-SEWER DEPT A1566 HENNEPIN PARTS SKI TRIP/FEES PAID f 367 IBM MARCH 88 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 41568 IBM SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER/CITY HALL 41569 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL 01ST #272 BUS SERVICE-RECREATION PROGRAMS 41570 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC MARCH 88 AGREEMENT-FIRE DEPT/SUPPLIES 41571 J & R RADIATOR CORP RADIATOR REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 41572 MARTY JESSEN BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 41573 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT/FIRE DEPT 41574 JUSTUS LUMBER CO -PLYWOOD/HINGES/PULLS/SCREWS/SHELVING/ SHELVING SUPPORTS-COMMUNITY CENTER 8977.80 126.22 274.10 617.18 182.00 165.40 1010.00 54.88 884.90 75.00 1966.50 257.50 330.00 36.00 52.00 111.00 161.16 1335.38 491.33 167.45 50.00 245.00 424.32 645.83 422.54 401.10 31.50 224.00 1452.76 323.69 41575 VOID OUT CHECK 41576 KENDALL U S A 41577 RON KIRSCH 41578 MOLLY KOIVUMAKI 41579 MARY KOTTKE 41580 KYSILKO PIANO SERVICE 41581 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY 41582 LAGERQUIST CORPORATION 41583 ROBERT LAMBERT 41584 CINDY LANENBERG 41585 LEEF BROS INC 41586 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD 41587 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD 41588 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC 41589 LIEBERMAN ENTERPRISES INC -90 LOGIS 8217994 POOL MAINTENANCE-COMMUNITY CENTER VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID PIANO REPAIR-SENIOR CENTER -HAZARDOUS MATERIAL KIT/CARBON MONOXIDE- MONITOR-FIRE DEPT ELEVATOR REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER MARCH 88 EXPENSES/DUES MILEAGE COVERALLS-STREET DEPT LEGAL SERVICE NOVEMBER 87 & DECEMBER 87 LEGAL SERVICE FEBRUARY 88 LEGAL SERVICES MUSIC ALBUMS-COMMUNITY CENTER JANUARY & FEBRUARY 88 SERVICE 0.00 515.14 216.00 311.18 132.00 25.00 2302.60 426.84 314.19 40.25 117.25 348.90 32783.46 11305.77 54.25 11790.57 APRIL 5,1988 41591 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR 41592 LOUISVILLE LANDFILL INC 41593 DYLAN LOHONEN 11 594 VOID OUT CHECK mki595 M-V GAS CO 41596 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC 41597 MARTIN-MCALLISTER CONSULTING 41598 MIKE MARUSHIN 41599 KASYS CORPORATION 41600 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC 41601 MCGUIRE & SONS PLBG & HTG 41602 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO 41603 MEDICINE LAKE LINES 41604 DENNIS L MELLESMOEN 41605 METRO ALRAM INC 41606 METRO GARAGE DOOR CO 41607 METROPOLITAN FIRE EQUIP CO 41608 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION 41609 METROQUIP INC 41610 KAREN MICHAEL 41611 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO "612 MIDWEST A/V CENTER INC ,13 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP 41614 MINNESOTA COMMUNICATIONS CORP 41615 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY 41616 MINNESOTA DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 41617 MINNESOTA FRAMES & PRINTS ETC 41618 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC 41619 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP 41620 R G MODEEN INC 41621 MODERN TIRE CO 41622 MOTOROLA INC 41623 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO 41624 GREGORY J MUELLER 41625 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 41626 MUNICILITE CO 41627 MY CHEESE SHOP 41628 NCR CORPORATION 41629 N E P CORPORATION 41630 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN 41631 GREGG NELSON TRAVEL INC 41632 NEUTRON INDUSTRIES INC 41633 VINHTHANH NGUYEN 41634 BRIAN NICHOLSON 41635 J P NOREX INC 36 NORTH STAR SOUND INC 20485791 SPROCKET/SEAL-PARK MAINTENANCE WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID SERVICE -CONVEYOR BELT/FILTERS/AIR FILTERS/SHEAR PIN-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE STRESS TESTS -SCREWDRIVER SET/MAGNETS/PLIERS SET/PRY -BARS/BEARINGS/SLEDGE WELDING HAMMER/ VISE GRIP/WASHER PARTS -APRIL 88 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/COMPUTER DISK/TAPE UPGRADE-POLICE DEPT EXPENSES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT -REPAIRED BOILER DAMPER/SHOWER VALVE/ DRAIN & WATER LINES-COMMUNITY CENTER OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT BUS SERVICE-KIDS KORNER MILEAGE 2ND QTR 88 ALARM SYSTEM-P/S BLDG GARAGE DOOR HINGES-PUBLIC WORKS BLDG -FIRE EXTINQUISHERS/INSPECT & REFILL -EXTINQUISHERS-WATER DEPT/PUBLIC WORKS/ SENIOR CENTER/LIQUOR STORE APRIL 88 SEWER SERVICE SWITCH-COMMUNITY CENTER EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECTOR REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER BLACKTOP-STREET DETP MARCH 88 PAGER SERVICE 32 SELF CONTAINED BRETHING APPARATUS-FIRE SERVICE-3RD QUARTER 87 CERTIFICATE FRAME & MOUNT-CITY HALL ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STOR SERVICE PAINTING-POLICE BLDG -TIRE REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER/PARK MAINTENANCE/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE RADIO REPAIR-FIRE DEPT BLADE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID SAND-SNOW & ICE CONTROL -SPOTLIGHTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/POLICE DEPT/WARNING LITES-FORESTRY DEPT EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT REGISTER TAPE-COMMUNITY CENTER STEEL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EMPLOYMENT ADS CONFERENCE-FIRE DEPT CLEANING SUPPLIES-POLICE BUILDING VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID SERVICE-WATER MAIN REPAIR REPAIR MICROPHONE SYSTEM-CITY HALL 99.09 36.00 137.50 0.00 325.00 908.50 400.00 552.95 24180.00 53.95 189.95 52.20 79.00 3.50 78.00 102.00 674.35 136607.35 20.11 51.82 915.66 38.50 1215.00 242.86 30421.00 150.00 52.40 273.60 55.25 195.38 150.95 593.69 120.00 54.00 1042.32 688.51 7.47 75.36 30.00 79.38 396.00 99.94 121.50 115.00 3137.87 35.00 APRIL 5,1988 41637 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO 41638 VOID OUT CHECK 11 '639 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC 41640 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC 41641 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 41642 PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CENTER 41643 PENNZOIL PRODUCTS COMPANY 41644 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO 41645 PET CREMATION SERVICE OF MN 41646 CONNIE PETERS 41647 PHOTON INC 41648 PHOTOS INC 41649 PINK COMPANIES 41650 POLAR CHEVROLET & MAZDA 41651 POMMER COMPANY INC 41652 QUINLAN PUBLISHING 41653 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 41654 PRAIRIE HARDWARE 41655 PRAIRIE HARDWARE i56 PRAIRIE HARDWARE 41657 PRAIRIE HARDWARE 41658 PRAIRIE HARDWARE 41659 PRAIRIE HARDWARE 41660 PRAIRIE HARDWARE 41661 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 41662 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 41663 PREFERRED IMAGE 41664 PRENTICE-HALL INC 41665 PRINT SHACK 41666 PSQ LEASING & MAINTENANCE 41667 CATHY PUTKA 41668 JOSHUA PUTKA 41669 LISA WESEN 41670 FIVE STAR CONSTRUCTION INC 41671 R & R SPECIALTIES INC ( ,72 RADIO SHACK 2007830 -SERVICE-TIMBER CREEK NORTH/PINNACLE DR & 1079.50 BAKER ROAD/DONNAY ROUND LAKE ESTATES 0.00 -CABLE/MONITOR/KEYBOARD-HUMAN RESOURCES/ z38.90 SOFTWARE & SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT -CHAIN/LINKS/LOGGING SLING-PARK MAINT/ 123.73 FORESTRY DEPT SERVICE-MARCH 88 134.00 FITNESS TESTS-POLICE DEPT 182.00 OIL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 377.85 CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 205.50 SERVICE 10.00 MILEAGE 17.50 FILM PROCESSING-ASSESSING DEPT 12.74 PRINTING-FORESTRY DEPT 115.00 SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 465.00 1987 CELEBRITY STATIONWAGON-POLICE DEPT 9585.00 TROPHIES/PLAQUES-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 455.00 SUBSCRIPTION-FIRE DEPT 36.00 -POOL REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER/LITE 1297.35 REPLACEMENT-POLICE BUILDING -BLADE SET/VARNISH/STAIN/HINGES/SANDPAPER/ 296.95 -NAILS/PIPE/OUTLET BOX/TOGGLE BOLT/SCREWS/ -VELCRO/PUTTY/WASHERS/HOSE ENDS/COOLERS/ DRILL BIT/BOLTS/SPRAY PAINT-PARK MAINT -TIES/BRACKETS/BRUSHES/BOLTS/PLUGS/HOSE 161.96 -CLAMPS/HOSE CONNECTORS/SHELF SUPPORTS/ -SHELF/SOAP/SCALE/TIRE GAUGE/VISOR MIRROR/ WATER DEPT -BATTERIES/OUTLETS/CONNECTORS/OUTLET 69.58 COVERS/SHOE LACES/KEYS/PAINT-SEWER DEPT -HOOKS/BOLTS/HOSE CLAMPS/SCREWS/BULBS/ 173.29 -PAINT/BATTERIES/CLOCK/BRUSHES/MASKING -TAPE/LIGHT DIFUSERS/ANTI-FREEZE/OIL/ SWITCH/CLIPS-COMMUNITY CENTER CASTERS-LIQUOR STORE 43.13 -WASTEBASKET/LETTERS/PAPER TOWELS/SPOONS/ 25.03 PAPER PLATES-STREET DEPT STEP STOOL/BATTERIES-BUILDING DEPT 45.40 SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 4.90 BELT/FUEL CONTAINER-POLICE BLDG/FIRE DEPT 10.33 T-SHIRTS/PULLOVERS/BAGS-RECREATION DEPT 1008.72 BOOKS-POLICE DEPT 55.08 PRINTING-SENIOR CENTER 232.00 MARCH-MAY 88 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 1465.50 EMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE-STOP SMOKING PROGRAM 43.20 SERVICE-WATER DEPT 69.00 SUPPLIES-RECREATION DEPT 4.51 -DOORWAY FROM ADMINISTRATION DEPT TO 800.00 CONFERENCE ROOM -ENGINE GASKET SET/HEAD ASSEMBLY EXCHANGE/ 1154.75 -HOSES/HYDRAULIC OIL/BELTS/WATER PUMP/ -REPLACE WATER PUMP/ZAMBONI BLADES SHARPENED-ICE ARENA-COMMUNITY CENTER TWO TAPE RECORDER-POLICE DEPT 79.90 APRIL 5,1988 41673 REGIONAL MUTUAL AID ASSOC 41674 RELIANCE ELECTRIC 41675 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS OF MN 11 '676 RIDGE DOOR SALES .1677 RIEKE-CARRO1I-MUIIER ASSOC INC 41678 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CO 41679 ROAD RESCUE INC 41680 ROLLINS OIL CO 41681 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS INC 41682 SANCO INC 41683 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO 41684 DALE SCHMIDT 41685 SEXTON DATA PRODUCTS INC 41686 SHERMIN WILLIAMS CO 41687 VOID OUT CHECK 41688 W GORDON SMITH CO 41689 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP 41690 SNYDERS DRUG STORE INC 41691 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC 41692 SOUTHWEST AUTO SUPPLY INC -,1693 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMIS 41694 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC 41695 SPORTS WORLD USA 41696 SPS COMPANIES 41697 STATE OF MINNESOTA 41698 STANDARD SPRING CO 41699 STARS RESTAURANT 41700 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE 41701 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH INC 41702 STS CONSULTANTS LTD 41703 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 41704 SULLIVANS SERVICES INC 41705 SUN ELECTRIC CORPORATION 41706 NATALIE SWAGGERT 41707 SKIP SWANSON 41708 VALERIE K SWANSON ,26667 DUES-ENGINEERING DEPT BEARING/SHAFT/GEAR/COUPLING-WATER DEPT SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE DOOR REPAIR-FIRE STATION SERVICE-ROWLAND ROAD FEASIBILITY REGULATOR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE DISPOSABLE BLANKETS-FIRE DEPT FUEL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-RECREATION DEPT SPRAYERS & BOTTLES-POLICE BLDG OFFICE SUPPLIES EXPENSES-STREET DEPT SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER PAINT/PAINT THINNER-PARK MAINTENANCE -PAN/HORN RELAY/EXHAUST GASKET/REGULATOR/ -BUMPER/HAND CLEANER/OIL/ANTI-FREEZE/TAIL LIGHT-POLICE DEPT/EQUIP MAINT/FIRE DEPT -OIL/SOCKET SET/WRENCH/ANVIL/RATCHET- EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT -TAPE/MARKERS/FILE FOLDERS/PROTECTOR- COMMUNITY CENTER-SENIOR CENTER -VALVES/SEAT BELTS/FUEL PUMP/BATTERIES/ -SPLASH GUARDS/FILTERS/BELTS/BEARING/ -DEGREASER/FUEL INJECTION CLEANER/SWITCH/ -MIRRORS/HEAD LIGHTS/CALIPERS/CORE/ -CARBURETOR/BRAKE SHOE/TEMPERATURE CONTROL- -EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/PARK MAINTENANCE/ SEWER DEPT SI 2ND QTR 88 OPERATING EXPENSES -LEGAL ADS-PLANNING DEPT/EMPLOYMENT ADS- -PARK DEPT/WATER DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER/ HAPPENINGS-COMMUNITY CENTER -FITNESS SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT/NEEDLES/ -VOLLEYBALL SHIRTS/LETTERING-COMMUNITY CENTER BALL VALVE-WATER DEPT/GASKET-PARK MAINT TEST EQUIPMENT-POLICE DEPT -WASHERS/BOLTS/NUTS/SPACERS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE RESERVE OFFICERS APPRECIATION DINNER -2 BREATH TESTERS/HELMETS/BATONS-POLICE DEPT SERVICE SERVICE-WATER PLANT ADDITION -ADJUST TRANSMISSION/TRAY/PIPE/TUBE/ -GASKET/CONTROL ASSEMBLY/GRILLE/CABLE/ PLIERS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SERVICE-STARING LAKE PARK REBUILD CARBURATOR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE MARCH 88 EXPENSES VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID (,L(41.• 10.00 296.51 49.27 123.60 3457.55 32.00 144.46 6328.00 150.60 9.80 269.21 13.25 57.68 77.94 0.00 284.37 778.36 18.37 11.38 1856.06 2655.63 631.36 218.95 19.17 140.00 621.20 665.57 775.55 508.35 142.78 259.40 57.00 79.30 200.00 54.00 270.00 APRIL 5,1988 41709 TJ OF EDEN PRAIRIE 41710 TOLL COMPANY 1:4 1711 TRANSPORTATION ELECTRONICS INC ,712 TRAVEL PROFESSIONALS INC CO 41713 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS 41714 TROPICAL SNO OF MN 41715 TURF SUPPLY CO 41716 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO 41717 U S WATER NEWS 41718 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 41719 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 41720 UNITED BUSINESS PRODUCTS INC 41721 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICES 41722 UNIVERSAL 41723 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC 41724 TWENTIETH CENTURY PLASTICS 41725 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE INC 41726 VESSCO INC 41727 VICOM INC 41728 VIDEOTRONIX INC 41729 VIKING BUSINESS INTERIORS INC 41730 VIKING LABORATORIES 41731 VOSS ELECTRIC CO '732 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP CO 41733 KEITH WALL 41734 WALLYS 41735 JIM WALTERS PAPERS INC 41736 WATER PRODUCT CO 41737 WATERITE INC 41738 DON WENDLING 41739 WESCO 41740 WEST WELD 41741 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC 41742 WESTERN AREA FIRE TRAINING ACADEM 41743 WILSON TANNER GRAPHICS 41744 XEROX CORP 41745 YOUNGSTEDTS INC 41746 GERALD 0 ZAHN 41747 JANE A ZALESKY 41748 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 41749 JERRY ANDERSON 50 GREATER MPLS AREA 4837637 EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT HELIUM-PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ANTENNA -POLICE DEPT EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT FINGERPAINTS-RECREATION DEPT CONCESSIONS STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNTIY CTR FERTILIZER-PARK MAINTENANCE -OXYGEN/ACETYLENE/HYDROSTATIC TESTING/ -LENSES/ELECTRODES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/ PARK MAINTENANCE SUBSCRIPTION-WATER DEPT UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT UNIFORMS-FIRE DEPT PENS-POLICE DEPT UNIFORMS-CITY EMPLOYEES BATTERIES-SEWER DEPT NUTS & BOLTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ZIPPER BAGS-BUILDING DEPT GAS CYLINDER-COMMUNITY CENTER -COUPLER/GASKET/ 0 RINGS/PINS/PULLY/ COUPLINGS-WATER DEPT -MARCH 88 TELEPHONE WIRE MAINTENANCE- -PUBLIC WORKS DEPT/INSTALLATION OF PHONE SYSTEM-COMMUNITY CENTER OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT/CITY HALL SHELVING-CITY HALL/STREET DEPT CHEMICALS-COMMUNITY CENTER SWIMMING POOL BULBS-TRAFFIC CONTROL LIGHTS -INSTALL RESISTOR/REPAIR LIFT STATION SEWER DEPT EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT T-SHIRTS/BAGS-COMMUNITY CENTER XEROX PAPER-CITY HALL -198 5/8" METERS $9086.22/210 PRESSURE -REGULATORS-$5943.00/CLAMPS/VALVE-$2217.00 -WASHERS /GASKETS/NUTS & BOLTS/VALVE BOX- WATER DEPT 0 RINGS/SEALS-COMMUNITY CENTER TWO WAY RADIOS-POLICE DEPT LAMP-COMMUNITY CENTER -HELMET/ELECTRODES/LENSES/BLADES/APRON- EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SINK/BACKFLOW PREVENTOR-COMMUNITY CENTER WAFTA DUES-FIRE DEPT -PRINTING-NEWSLETTER/BUSINESS CARDS/ -ENVELOPES/LETTERHEAD-CITY HALL/COMMUNITY CENTER SERVICE WHEEL ALIGNMENT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID -FIRST AID SUPPLIES-STREET DEPT/CITY HALL PARK DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID BOOKS-ASSESSING DEPT 107.53 26.95 25.00 396.00 64.97 26.44 13568.16 187.73 34.00 1454.16 478.70 153.79 1651.00 66.80 208.40 586.12 170.26 352.78 354.25 405.16 1388.38 1842.60 254.06 366.57 8.00 582.00 795.00 18468.98 42.48 450.00 273.56 197.80 152.94 1241.00 1055.00 90.00 58.95 308.00 54.00 287.85 86.00 55.00 APRIL 5,1988 41751 KROY INC 41752 EDEN PRAIRIE TRASHTRONICS t 1753 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD 6897 VOID OUT CHECK 40008 VOID OUT CHECK 40795 VOID OUT CHECK 40939 VOID OUT CHECK 41200 VOID OUT CHECK -(651964) KROY TAPE-POLICE DEPT FEBRUARY 88 TRASH PICKUP DECEMBER 87 LEGAL SERVICE 517.58 532.50 3000.00 15.00- 1415.92- 8933.34- 32.46- 173.00- $855756.43 DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS 422967.66 69789.76 40972.72 29792.91 1459.65 52327.57 28970.38 14269.57 4023.69 -181.43 44652.85 141232.12 4298.06 1180.97 1!1 GENERAL . CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT 5 LIQUOR STORE-P V M 17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE 20 CEMENTARY OPERATIONS 31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP 33 UTILITY BOND FUND 51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 55 IMPROVEMENT DEBT FUND ARB 57 ROAD IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 73 WATER FUND 77 SEWER FUND 81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 90 TAX INCREMENT FUND $855756.48 ci6K STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning March 11, 1988 Flying Cloud Office/Warehouse Building South of Pioneer Trail at Yorkshire Lane, north of County Road #1 Eugene M. Branstrom Oakwood Builders, Inc. Site Plan Review within the 1-2 Zoning District for construction of a 9,848 square foot office/warehouse building. DATE: PROJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: FEE OWNER: REQUEST: Background The Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts an Industrial use for this site with Industrial uses to the east and west, and small lot Single Family Residential to the north. The Metropolitan Airports Commission owns the property to the south. In November of 1985, the City Council approved a rezoning request for this property to 1-2 for construction of a 9,800 square foot office/warehouse. As part of that approval, any future phase was to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council. Site Plan The request is for site plan review of the Phase II building, to be a mirror image of Phase I as was originally contemplated. Total site Floor Area Ratio (FAR) will be 19.5% while the industrial district would allow up to 30%. All building and parking setbacks meet City Code. : Based on a total of 19,696 square 1 feet for both structures, 55 parking F, spaces will be required based on 1/3 I AREA LOCATION MA (or) Flying Cloud Office/Ware. ise Building 2 March 11, 1988 office, 1/3 manufacturing, and 1/3 warehouse use. The proponent ha s p r o v i d e d 5 5 spaces. Parallel parking spaces will need to be revised to meet Code d i m e n s i o n s o f 9 x 23. Access to the building will be from Pioneer Trail through the existing c u r b c u t s f o r Phase I. No access will be provided to County Road #1. A portion o f t h e d r i v e aisle does not meet the 25-foot width due to some parking space infringe m e n t . T h e s e spaces will need to be relocated (see Attachment A). Grading and Drainage Minimal grading will be required since the site is basically flat. M i n o r c h a n g e s will be necessary to provide positive drainage. No on-site storm w a t e r c o l l e c t i o n system is proposed. All drainage will be surface run-off; one-hal f t o t h e n o r t h , one-half to the south. Utilities Utilities for this building are already in place. An 8-inch sanitary s e w e r a n d 6 - inch water main extend to the building location. A fire hydrant will b e p r o v i d e d . Landscaping Based on the total building square footage for the site, the pr o p o n e n t i s i n compliance with the caliper inch requirements. In Phase I planting, t h e p r o p o n e n t provided a 3-foot berm and hedge row to screen the loading area from t h e r e s i d e n t i a l property to the east. Since Phase II construction will also have the l o a d i n g a r e a facing the east, the 3-foot berm and hedge row planting scheme shou l d c o n t i n u e t o the south so as to provide screening for the residential property an d v i e w s f r o m County Road #1. City Code requires that coniferous trees be a minimum of 6 feet at p l a n t i n g . T h e proponent should revise the landscape plan to show 6-foot evergreens i n p l a c e o f 4 feet. Architecture The proposed 15-foot building will be a mirror image of Phase I. Exteri o r m a t e r i a l s will consist of burnished concrete block, glass, and cedar siding. Wo o d o c c u p i e s approximately 10% of the building exterior; Code would allow up to 2 5 % . A s w i t h Phase I, all mechanical equipment will be located in the structure to m a i n t a i n a clean roof line. Overhead doors should be of a consistent color to blend with t h e c o l o r o f t h e building. Site lighting will be required to be of a downcast variety t o l i m i t o f f - site glare. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff would recorunend approval of the request for Site Plan Review w i t h i n t h e 1 - 2 zoning district on 2.29 acres subject to the Staff Repert dated Ma r c h 1 1 , 1 9 8 8 , based on plans dated February 12, 1988, and subject to the following: 1 Prior to Council review, proponent shall: A. Revise the parking plan to provide for a 25-foot drive aisle along the east side of the building (see Attachment A). In addition, revise parallel parking spaces to meet 9' x 23' dimensions. 6/7 Flying Cloud Office/Warehouse Building 3 March 11, 1988 B. Revise the landscaping plan to show a continuaticn of the 3-foot berm and hedge row planting along the east property line of the Phase II porticn of the site. Also indicate 6-foot evergreens in place of the 4-foot. 2. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water run-off, erosion control, and utility plans for review by the Watershed District and City Engineer. B. Submit color samples of the building materials, including overhead doors, and lighting details to limit off-site glare. C. Pay Cash Park Fee. D. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. 619 ; A') n 4./ iI 1 . •,—* 7" .1, t ii.' k.',XLZI•ZICATAT.-11344.304444.,;:........ _ ._ • ft,A.10-1C-1 • V lUeWLIOelle PARKING SPACE RELOCATION OPTIONS UNAPPROVED MINUTES Eden Prairie Planning Commission -5- March 14, 1988 C. FLYING CLOUD OFFICE WAREHOUSE CONDOMINIUM, by Eugene M. Branstrom. Request for Site Plan Review within t h e 1-2 District on 2.29 acres for construction of a 9,8 4 8 square foot office/warehouse. Location: South of Pioneer Trail at Yorkshire Lane, North of County Roa d # 1 . A public meeting. Franzen reported this item had previously been revie w e d b y the Commission, at which time the proponent was to r e t u r n t o Commission and Council for site plan review of the s e c o n d building on the property. This second building comp l i e s with the requirements of the Developer's Agreement. H e introduced Eugene Branstrom as the proponent. Branstrom presented the proposed 15-foot building wh i c h w o u l d be the same as Phase I. The exterior materials cons i s t o f rock-face block, glass, cedar siding, and wood occupi e s 1 0 % o f the building exterior. All mechanical equipment wou l d b e located in the structure to maintain a clean roof l i n e . T h e building would consist of 1/2 office and 1/2 warehou s e , calling for 55 parking spaces. Access would be from P i o n e e r Trail, and there would not be an access from County R o a d # 1 . Franzen reported that the Staff was recommending appr o v a l a s proposed on the south side of the existing building i n accordance with the Staff Recommendations Report date d February 12, 1988. There would be a revision on the p a r k i n g plan to provide for a 25-foot drive aisle along the e a s t s i d e of the building and revised parallel parking spaces t o m e e t 9' x 23' dimensions. Fell commented that parking was based on 1/3 warehous e a n d 1/3 manufacturing but proponent stated the building w a s 1/2 warehouse and 1/2 manufacturing, and inquired i f t h e parking was adequate. Franzen responded it was ade q u a t e for the use of the building. No comments were received from the audience. 6d I Eden Prairie Planning Commission -6- March 14, 1988 MOTION: Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Fell to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Eugene M. Branstrom for Site Plan Review within the 1-2 Zoning District on 2.29 acres, based on plans dated February 11, 1988, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 11, 1988. Motion carried 6-0-0 6a Hockey Association of Eden Prairie cro Eden Prairie Community Center 16700 Valley View Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 March 23,1988 Eden Prairie City Council City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Mr. Mayor and Members of the City Council: On behalf of the Hockey Association of Eden Pr a i r i e ( H A E P ) , I am writing this letter regarding the need for a second refrigerated ice rink in Eden Prairie. My purpo s e i n w r i t i n g is to illustrate to you the need for such a rink and to discuss the cost of and expenses that would be i n c u r r e d w i t h the construction of this new rink. The need is easily seen. The Eden Prairie Community Center (EPCC) rink is currently in use from 6:00 AM to 2 : 0 0 A M ( 1 8 total hour) 7 months of the year. The rink is c l o s e d i n M a y for maintenance. The balance or summer months o f t h e y e a r the rink is used from 8:00 AM to 2:00 AM. This f a c i l i t y i s used by Varsity and Junior Varsity hockey teams , t h e H A E P , figure skaters, school physical education depar t m e n t s , t h e Minnesota North Stars, broomball organizations, s e n i o r m e n s " leagues, and the public. Up to 12 hours per we e k e n d i s m a d e available to all Eden Prairie residents as open s k a t i n g . During school hours, pre-school figure skaters, t h e M i n n e s o t a North Stars, our school's physical education de p a r t m e n t s , etc. use the rink. Basically, the rink is used a l l o f t h e time. The HAEP buys aproximately 800 hours of t i m e p e r y e a r from the EPCC at a current rate of $72.50 per h o u r . T h i s i s all we are offered. --We are forced to buy additional time from Blake and Shakopee to facilitate the nee ,ls of our youth hockey programs. This past year we purchased ab o u t 1 7 0 h o u r s from these other rinks. This too was all that w a s m a d e available to us. We needed more. The HAEP toda y h a s approximately 550 skaters. About 600 people cur r e n t l y t a k e skating lessons. The figure skating club can n o t o f f e r t h e programs it wishes, because no more ice time is m a d e available for them to buy. The HAEP 1987-88 sea s o n h a d 7 year olds skating at 6:00 AM on saturdays and su n d a y e , 9 y e a r olda skating at 6:00 AM befora school, and 15 ye a r o l d s skatind until 11:00 PM on a school night. On a personal note, my 8 year old son's schedule had him ska t i n g e v e r y g a m e on Sunday mornings. We have been able to atte n d c h u r c h t w i c e since January let, because of his schedule. His s c h e d u l e w a s Poor, but all levels of hockey have many poora, h o u r s scheduled. We do not skate our youth more -than other community hockey associations. The truth is, in fact, we skate less than most groups, because of the lack of available ice time. In short we have arrived at a situation in Eden Prairie where one rink can not accommodate all the needs of the public., our youth groups, and adult organizations. Cost studies were done prior to the last Park Bond Referendum. For approximately $1.5 million the City ,an build a second rink at the EPCC. Current refrigeration equipment with perhaps one more compressor will be able to handle the load of the second ice sheet. No additional staff would be necessary to run these two rinks. The demand for ice time is so great that the second rink would too be used all of the time. $200,000 is now received annually from the ' current rink ice hour rentals. The income received from the second rink would far exceed its operataional expense. If debt service were included in these expense calculations, the Center would still operate at a profit in its ice rink operation. Eden Prairie is one of the two fastest growing communities in Minnesota. With this rapid increase in population will obviously come an increase in figure skaters, hockey players, recreational groups, and the general public who wishes to skate. If the demand for inside skating is currently restricting the HAEP's and others'scheduling now, what will the situation become next year and the year after. We intend to show the City that people in this community do want this rink. Because the need for a rink is there and the rink is revenue producing, City Council action should be inititated that would authorize the construction of this second rink. We remain committed to this rink request process and stand ready to assist all City staff with facts, figures, and man- power as necessary. I thank you for your review of this letter and subsequest timely action concerning this need for Eden Prairie. Sincerely, Woody Ginkel New Rink Committee cc Bob Lambert Director of Community Services 69,g Norseman Oil Co.. Inc. AIWA& AMOCO) 11111W--/ DBA/MARK'S EDEN PRAIRIE AMOCO 8100 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE MINNESOTA 55344 (612) 944-1690 March 21, 1988 Eden Prairie City Officials 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 As a resident business owner, athletic team sponsor, athletic coach, and overall concerned citizen for our caaaunity, I feel compelled to address the urgent need to our council and city parks and recreation staff to add additional indoor ice and combination soccer practice-softball practice areas. By the nature of my business, I get an opportunity to visit with a great number of residents of Eden Prairie, and from all the many conversations I have had with these residents concerning hockey and ice time, figure skating clubs, open ice available for general camounity use, etc., I see there is a unanimous consensus that we do need an indoor ice facility in this community. With the prospective additional growth, the profitability of the current community center and the revenue being spent in other area communities to purchase additional ice time, my feeling is that we could certainly have a facility built that would not be a burden to the tax payers. I urge the council to consider this and would be happy to discuss my true feelings in detail with any council member and lend the support that I can put forth toward this endeavor. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, lI E Mark A. Namtved York's Amoco (Home) 10885 Hyland Terrace Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (612) 941-1418 MAN/wsn cc: Tom Bierman, EP Soccer Association Lyle Shaw, EP Hockey Association MEMORANDUM TO: THROUGH: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Mayor and City Council City Manager Carl J. JullieC \ A Joyce Provo, Executive Secretary Boards and Commissions March 17, 1988 Listed below are names of people who have volunteered to serve on boards and commissions that were not appointed. I have indicated which board(s)/commission(s ) each one has applied for: Roger Sandvick Board of Appeals & Adjustments (as indicated in a previous memo, Mr. Sandvick would have to be appointed with unanimous consent of the Council as he has served two three-year consecutive terms) Scott Anderson Any board or commission Ann Youngdahl Boline Parks, Recreation & Natural Res. Comm. Michael Bozonie Planning Commission, Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission or Human Rights Services Commission Michael Montgomery Ross R. Peterson Douglas Reuter Terry Thompson Callen A. Zachman Planning Commission, Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission, and Building Code Board of Appeals Planning Commission Planning Commission Planning Commission Planning Commission We did receive two additional applicants after the cut-off date, those being: Bette Anderson Human Rights & Services Commission Timothy Smalley Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission or Planning Commission The Council will have a 2nd Reading of the Ordinance changing the composition of the Board of Appeals & Adjustments to nine members at the April 5 City Council meeting. On that same agenda will be listed the appointment of two additional members to the Board of Appeals & Adjustments. In order to keep the expiratio n dates on a consistent basis, one member should be appointed to a three-year te r m and the other member to a two-year term. 6,42 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: -( City Manager Carl J. Jullie / V Development Moratoriums March 31, 1988 Mayor and City Council MEMORANDUM At the March 16 Council meeting Staff was directed to review the potential need for the Council to impose moratoriums on development in the Major Center "Downtown" Area and also the newly developing southwest area of Eden Prairie. Upon Staff discussion, including input from the City Attorney, I recommend that the Council not impose any such moratorium at this time. A better approach is to rely upon the City's usual development review process which addresses all of the impacts and planning issues which may give rise to the need for delaying approval of a specific project. Also permission for projects to proceed can be conditioned upon the completion of studies, testing, etc., as long as thP delay involved is "reasonable". Since the word "moratorium" does often carry a very negative connotation amongst landowners and developers, it does seem best at this time to simply rely upon the City's development review process to assure that proposed projects will properly conform with our comprehensive land use planning and timing for utilities, roads, recreation facilities, etc. Within a specific planning area it may be appropriate to allow some projects to continue while holding others back. This would, of course, depend upon the specifics of each proposal. A blanket "moratorium" probably would not allow this flexibility. CJJ:jdp MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Staff Downtown Team DATE: March 31, 1988 RE: City's Role in Downtown Planning The current status of Hometown-Downtown Eden Prairie is fairly fluid. While a l l t h e pieces are floating, the City can be most helpful by providing over v i e w , coordination, overall planning, and facilitating design and land-use formul a t i o n . Since the announcement by Curt Johnson Properties of their desire to b e t h e developer of Downtown Eden Prairie, experience gained at numerous meetings w i t h them, other M.C.A. property owners, and the City Staff, suggests a pla n f o r proceeding similar to that proposed in September, 1987 to the City Council. Members of the Downtown City Staff team have met with; Curt Johnson Propertie s o n several occasions, Dick Feerick, Brian Cluts (architect representative fo r I r y Margolis, Eden Place Center), and Ed Flaherty (owner of Preserve commer c i a l properties in the M.C.A.). While there are still other property owners to m e e t with; Data Serve, Rosemount, Castle Ridge, it is evident from meetings so far t h a t each property owner is willing to design a project to fit with overall goals a n d criteria. The Eden Place Center project is farthest along at this point. The developer h a s been cooperative in providing design features compatible with downtown goals. Curt Johnson properties has not signed a deal with Plitt Theaters yet, but h a v e indicated the type of architecture they would propose is from the Frank Lloyd Wr i g h t and Louis Sullivan "Prairie School" of architecture. This might be described a s "neo-traditional" and works well with the design of the Eden Place Center. Ed Flaherty is willing to participate in a joint design formulation and Dick Fee r i c k also indicates a desire to do so. The City should, therefore, participate in the formulation of design and land u s e for Hometown Downtown first in an overview capacity. The City will work with a l l property owners and coordinate land use and design features. The City shou l d facilitate joint meetings with developers and their design professionals to adop t a design and land-use framework to use in review of the projects. The City will work with property owners and their designers early on and coor d i n a t e designs between them. This involves the City and the property owners in formu l a t i o n of plans earlier than would be normal in a City review. The City Council could direct the City Downtown Staff team to work with pr o p e r t y owners in the downtown area to assure plans, when submitted by individual l a n d owners or developers which were coordinated with others to be compatible in lan d - u s e and to portray a unique and identifiable architectural design theme, in accor d a n c e with the attached goals. Each developer would then be free to submit their proposal to the City for any special City participation in special plazas, parking, urban parks, e t c . . The City should continue at the same time to provide overall co n t r i b u t i o n s i n 1 ) Traffic, 2) Road alignments, 3) Road improvement phasing, 4) Purgat o r y P a r k e n t r a n c e studies. The City's participation in the development of Hometown Downtown i n s u m m a r y c o u l d be: 1. To provide an overview function to assure that each developer' s p l a n a n d design fits into a framework established by adopted goals. 2. To continue to provide information and direction from special studi e s i n t h e M.C.A.. Assure that proper planning has been done to provide a f r a m e w o r k for the downtown according to the goals. 3. To act as a coordinator of individual plans. Involvement with formu l a t i o n o f all plans early in the design process. 4. To act as a facilitator to joint design meetings with developer a n d t h e i r designers in formulating compatible land-use proposals and proje c t w i t h a common, unique, identifiable design theme according to downtown goa l s . 5. To provide review of a project as the governmental unit respons i b l e f o r zoning and Till-Elise control. 1. A DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN for the primary and peripheral planni n g a r e a s which will indicate proposed uses, relationships, pedestrian and v e h i c u l a r circulation, parking, entrance and exit features. streetscapP and p o d . f r i a n space design concepts, structural locations, orientation, massing, fenestration characteristics, colors, materials, fin i s h e s , street/parking/structural/landscape lighting systems, schematic uti l i t y a n d drainage systems, ornamental and specimen art and art objects, str e e t a n d pedestrian area pavements and other elements of the proposed design c o n c e p t , presented in graphic and textual forms. 2. A final DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN REPORT DOCUMENT which effectively incorporates and communicates the substance and the concept of the p r o p o s e d plan. 3. An EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DOCUMENT which incorporates and communicates t h e m o r e significant features and concepts of the proposed plan. 4. DESIGN CONSULTATION and assistance to others preparing specific desi g n s f o r the Phase I Area in order that the Phase I Area design may be submitt e d f o r City review and approval concurrently with the overall CONCEPT PL A N w i l l b e consistent with and accurately illustrative of the overall CONCEPT. 5. A DEVELOPMENT GUIDE AND REVIEW MANUAL which will serve as a design g u i d e f o r future phases to assure consistent and coordinated future developme n t o f t h e remaining planning area. 6. OUTLINE SPECIFICATIONS for structures and streetscape design ele m e n t s a n d assistance to CJP in costing future development proposals in the pl a n . 7. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION in orderly file form, including base d a t a a n d parameters, design calculations, assumptions, records of alte r n a t i v e s considered and selection decisions, indexed catalog cuts or spec i f i c a t i o n references for equipment, materials, finishes, colors and all o t h e r f i l e data which may be helpful to future planning and design decisions. 8. Develop a composition of land uses which serve as a commercial ser v i c e a n d recreational focal center for the community of Eden Prairie. The l a n d u s e s could include theaters, restaurants, community retail and service commercial, residential, office, a post office, city administrative o f f i c e s , community plaza and commons area, and government service area. 9. While land uses could be regional in nature, they should be p r i m a r i l y targeted toward and of service to, the community of Eden Prairie. 10. The uses should be compatible, supportive, related, and orie n t e d t o pedestrian use. The entire downtown area together should act as a o n e - s t o p , one-park magnet to allow people to utilize the whole area, not just s t o p a t one shop and drive on. 11. Uses should be designed to allow year-round pedestrian use without b u r y i n g everyone within an "interior environment". For example, on cl e a r , c a l m , winter days, activities and uses should be oriented and provid e d f o r i n protected areas outside as they are in European cities. A future s k y w a y , o r partially enclosed walkway system may have application. I 12. Could include civic functions such as a museum, conservatory, parks, farmers market, library, government services, etc. 13. There should be a clear, central, identifiable architectural "theme" established, which is especially reflective of Eden Prairie. The theme architectural elements should be expressed in site work (i.e landscaping, paving, signs, lighting, etc.), exterior materials, period of architecture. 14. The City streets, site plans, and common areas, should utilize common materials and design approach to exterior furniture, landscaping, paving, lighting, signage, etc. Streetscape elements: Special street lights Street Landscaping (Planters) Waste containers Clocks Information kiosks Bollards Private walks Public streets Special stop lights Special street details (curbing, surfacing, pedestrian, etc.) Pennants/flags Sitting areas Bus shelters 15. Common areas, "vest pocket" parks, promenades, sidewalk plazas, fountains, squares, etc, are all elements which should be considered as major features within the area. 16. Should be served by a local and regional transit system (i.e. bus, possibly LRT stop). The result should be a distinctively designed, cohesively coordinated downtown which serves Eden Prairie, making the difference between a suburb and a "new town". GP C., MEMORANDUM ' TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Mayor and City Council City Manager Carl J. Jullie Li( City Participation in T.H. 5 P oject March 31, 1988 The attached letters of March 4 and March 22, 1988 from Mn/DOT Commissioner Len Levine provide an update to the scheduling for Phase 4 of Mn/DOT's T.H. 5 improvement program. As the Council will recall, Phase 1 has already been let and that work is in progress from Prairie Center Drive to Wallace Road. Phase 2 is from Wallace Road to a quarter mile west of County Road 4 and includes removal of the railroad bridge. Letting for Phase 2 is planned for October of this year. Phase 3 was for resurfacing, including shoulders and slope work from 3/4 mile west of T.H. 41 in Chanhassen to a quarter mile west of County Road 4 in Eden Prairie. This work has been added to the contract under Phase 1 and is now in progress. Phase 4 is widening T.H. 5 to four-lanes from a quarter mile west of County Road 4 to County Road 17 in Chanhassen. Mn/DOT's currently proposed letting date for Phase 4 is November of 1991. The efforts of the Southwest Corridor Transporation Coalition and the rationale for the City's $50,000 contribution are directed toward the accelerating of the letting date of Phase 4 by one or two years. So far, Mr. Levine's letters and indications we have received from the Mn/DOT staff are that it will not be possible to accelerate this Phase 4 prior to 1991. Mr. Feerick, representing the Coalition, has suggested that the City should consider being the lead agency as referred to in the third paragraph of Mr. Levine's March 4 letter. The City's engineering staff could handle this assignment and we could cut out a substantial amount of time that Mn/DOT usually requires to hire an engineering consultant (30 months). At this time, however, this appears to be the only time savings that can be accomplished by the City's involvement in this project, including our $50,000 potential cash participation. We may have more information for the Council on this matter by Tuesday evening, at which time the Council may wish to give the Staff direction in accordance with your preferences. CJJ:jdp Attachment Ccl ,0NES01, • — 4 ( le,2.1 DMei7Jrzlit;Ismo cti;Int of Transportation st.5- Transportation Building ; 04, (e St. Paul, Minnesota 55:55 r It, OF TO` 0111( e ol Commissioner, 1612) 296 3000 March 4, 1988 Mr. Richard M. Feerick, Chairman Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition 1107 Hazeltine Boulevard Suite 454 Chaska, MN 55 18 Dear Mrti Thank you for your letter of February 4, 1988, concerning highway improvements on T.H. 5 in the Chanhassen and Eden Prairie area. The Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition's efforts in supporting increased funding for highway improvements certainly is appreciated by Mn/DOT. Hopefully, with the cooperation of groups such as yours, the 1988 legislature will provide the means to continue the economic vitality of Minnesota through an excellent transportation system. Your activities to raise funds for potential assistance on the upgrading of T.H. 5 tocraC.S.A.H. 17 to C.S.A.H. 4 are to be commended. Mh/DOT is willing tohelp in this effort to hire a consultant to provide assistance on the final design and on other critical project development activities as needed. I suggest that a local governmental unit be the lead agency for contracting with a consultant and that a joint powers agreement be consunneted between agencies contributing towards financing the consultant. Mn/DUT has commenced the project developent process. While a significant portion of the layout has been initially drafted, its virtual caupletion remains to be accomplished. Upon completion, the layout will be submitted for staff approval. The right of way acquisition and relocation is strictly regulated by state and federal guidelines and, therefore, it is difficult to accelerate the process and remain eligible for federal funds on T.H. 5. As you know, the project will involve the relocation of people and the Federal Relocation Assistance Act dictates certain procedures and time tables that cannot be circumvented. An Equal Opportunity Employer 41111. Mt. Richard M. Feerick Mardi 4, 1988 Page 2 Mn/DOT will make every effort to accommodate the project development process in as short a time schedule as realistic. There are, however, no Absolute project acceleration guarantees where approvals are required by other governmental agencies. Sorry I missed your meeting with the Governor, as I was testifying before the House Transportation Committee on the very issue (highway fmmling) for which the coalition has been so supportive. I'm sure that the cooperation between the Coalition and Mn/DOT can continue to enhance highway improvements in the southwest corridor area. Thank you again for your interest in the T.H. 5 improvements. . LEVINE Commissioner cc: Honorable Gary Peterson, Mayor of Eden Prairie Honorable Tom Hamilton, Mayor of Chanhassen Mt. Reed MacKenzie, Hazeltine National Golf Club Nlintics()ta I.X .partment (II TNItisi)()rtati()I1 TransportiiIIIIII lit Ii!cling St. Paul. Mitiru•silta 55133 LEONARD W. LEVINE COMMISSIONER March 22, 1988 Mr. James C. Erickson Mr. Todd M. Vlatkovich Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Bloomington, Minnesota 55451 Dear Messrs. Erickson and Vlatkovich: Because Governor Perpich considers improvements to T.H.'s 5 and 212 top priorities, he has asked me to respond to your letter of February 16, 1988. Unfortunately, I was unable to attend the February 10, 1988, Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition meeting you had with the Governor as I was testifying before the House Transportation Committee on the issue of highway funding. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has commenced the project development process. While a significant portion of the layout has been initially drafted, its virtual completion remains to be accomplished. Upon completion, the layout will be submitted for staff approval. The right of way acquisition and relocation are strictly regulated by state and federal guidelines and, therefore, it is difficult to accelerate the process and remain eligible for federal funds on T.H. 5. As you know, the project will involve the relocation of people and the Federal Relocation Assistance Act dictates certain procedures and timetables that cannot be circumvented. Thank you for your interest in highway improvements in the southwest area. Sincer y Ow LEONARD W. LEVINE Commissioner cc: Honorable Gary Peterson, Mayor of Eden Prairie Honorable Tom Hamilton, Mayor of Chanhassen Mr. Reed MacKenzie, Hazeltine National Golf Club I! L rnpls 0' 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources DATE: March 24, 1988 SUBJECT: Comprehensive Park Plan Revised Contract & Scope of Services Attached is a letter dated March 23, 1988 from Barry Warner, Barton-Aschman Associates, outlining the revised scope of services and contract cost for the Comprehensive Park Plan and Development Guide Update. Upon review of the original contract, staff was uncomfortable with language in the contract and the extra services costs. The original contract was for $49,000, but had a rather broad extra services clause and did not have specific language regarding a chapter on preservation of natural resources, or was not addressing municipal golf course needs. Staff requested the planner to provide a revised contract that included those studies on a cost not to exceed basis. Staff have reviewed the revised agreement and scope of services and recommend approval of this contract. BL:mdd e& Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 1610 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454 .612-332-0421 March 23, 1988 MS. Barbara Penning Cross City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677 Re: °apprehensive Park and Recreation Plan Revised Contract and Scope of Services Dear Ms. Cross: We have enclosed for your review and signature the revised contract and scope of services for the Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan. The scope of services has been changed to include staff comments and concerns. In addition, Appendix B has been added which provides a general outline of the planning document's proposed chapters and their content. The contract itself has been revised to a "cost not to exceed basis" which includes out of rocket expenses. The contract's clause relating to extra services has been clarified. The contract's fee has been changed to $68,600, commensurate with scope and contract format revision requests submitted by staff after Barton-Aschman's interview and selection. The increase in consultant compensation is due to the following items: 1. Staff requested that the contract be completed on a "cost not to exceed basis" instead of a "cost plus expenses" basis. Experience on projects similar to this has shown that approximately 15 to 20 percent of the project costs can be attributed to out of pocket expenses such as printing, mileage, computer costs and photographic services. 2. The scope of services was revised to include a chapter on natural resource policy and inventory. This task was submitted subsequent to the initial RFP. L"))(4 Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. March 23, 1988 Page 2 3. The need for a municipal golf course has been integrated into our scope of services. The attached scope of services will include questions regarding the golf course in the community survey, a subsection on golf course market based upon population demogniptics and competition, and a description of potential golf course sites based upon undeveloped parcels within the city. 4. Sketch plans will be provided for each park listed rather than the principal facilities. A list has been provided by the city and incorporated into the scope of services. A sketch plan will not be provided for a potential golf course layout. We submit that this task is over and above the content of a normal community park system plan and should be conducted as an additional study. We hope that this contract and scope of services meets with your needs and expectations. It is important that Barton-Aschman and the City of Eden Prairie conduct this study as a team whose collective efforts will provide a plan in the community's best interests. This team effort should be based upon strong communication and positive team spirit. Sincerely yours, BARTON-ASCHMN ASSOCIATES, INC. Barry JilWarner Princioal Associate BJW:kro Attachment AGREEMENT BETWEEN EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA AND BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, IMC. FOR EDEN PRAIRIE COMPREHENSIVE PARK AND RECREZTION PLAN THIS AGREEMENT' made and entered into this day of by and between the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, hereinafter referred to as the CITY and BARION-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED, a Minnesota corporation with a regular place of business at 1610 South Sixth Street, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTANT. WIRIESSETH: That the CITY and the CONSULTANT, for the consideration hereinafter named, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK TD BE DONE That the CITY agrees to and hereby does retain and employ the CONSULTANT and the CONERUANT agrees to perform Professional Services as hereinafter described for the project, entitled Eden Prairie Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan, hereinafter referred to as the PROJECT and more particularly described in attached Exhibit A and B, a part hereof. The CONSULTANT hereby agrees to retain and employ RESOLUTION, INC., to perform certain portions of the PROJECT pursuant to the terms of the proposal presented to the CITY. No additional subconsultants or assignment of responsibilities will occur pursuant to the terms of Article 10 of this agreement. ARTICLE 2. MEETINGS The CONSULTANT will attend and conduct up to ten (10) public meetings including four (4) community/neighborhood forums, four (4) meetings with the Park and Recreation Commission, one (1) Planning Commission and one (1) City Council meeting. The CONSULTANT will also participate in biweekly informal meetings with the CITY staff. Additional meeting attendance and participation can be initiated by the CLIENT and will be determined to be additional services billed on a time and expanses basis incurred by the CONSULTANT. maacIE 3. TIME FOR 021PIETION The CONSULTANT agrees that work under this Agreement will begin within 7 calendar days after receipt of Authorization to Proceed. The term of the Agreement for the performance of services hereunder Shall be 180 days for Tasks 1-9 following the data of Authorization to Proceed. It is agreed that the "not to exceed" payment figure set forth in Article 4 herein has been established in anticipation of an orderly and continuous progress of the PROJECT for 180 consecutive days through completion of the work. ARTICLE 4. COMPENSATION TO THE OONSULTANT 4.10 The CITY shall pay to the CONSULTANT for services performed in accordance with this Agreement as follows: 4.10.1 Payment to the CONSULTANT for services described in Exhibit A of this Agreement shall be on the hourly rate basis for the hours actually spent thereon for the persons in the following classifications at the following ranges in hourly rates. These rate include compensation for all salary costs, payroll burden, general and administrative overhead and professional fee. Classification Principal Associate Senior Associate Associates Senior Designers and Senior Technicians Designers, Technicians, and Clerical Hour Billing Rates $65.00 to $90.00 $40.00 to $70.00 $33.00 to $60.00 $20.00 to $45.00 $15.00 to $33.00 4.10.2 The CONSULTANT shall also be rehnbursed at cost for the following Direct Expenses when incurred in the performance of the work: 1. Computer services 2. Outside printing and related materials 3. Identifiable reproduction costs 4. CONSULTANT travel expenses 4.10.3 The CITY Shall make monthly payments to the CONSULTANT within 30 days of date of invoice based on cougx:tations made in acaordance with the above charges for services provided and expenses incurred to date, accompanied by supporting evidence as required. All accounts unpaid after 30 days from the date of original invoice shall be subject to a service charge of 1% per month. 4.10.4 Payment to the CONSULTANT for actual time expended to complete services set forth in Exhibit A of this Agreement, shall not exceed $68,600 unless mutually changed by Supplemental Agreement for extra work or Changed conditions. In the event that services are provided by the CONSULTANT beyond the contract completion date as a result of circumstances beyond the control of the CONSULTANT, the "not to exceed" payment figure shall be subject to an upward adjustment established by Supplemental Agreement pursuant to the provisions of Article 5. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES AND SERVICES NOT INCLUDED IN THIS CONTRACT Extra work, additional compensation for same, and extension of time for completion shall be covered by a Supplemental Agreement mutually agreed upon by both parties prior to proceeding with any extra work or related expenditures. I ARTICLE 6. EOCUMENTS FORMING '1HE CONTRACT The contract documents shall be deemed to include this Agreement with all accompanying ekhibits as part hereof. ARTICLE 7. ABWONNENT, 0HANC1 OF PLAN AND TERMINATION Either Party has the right to terminate this Agreement upon seven days written notice. In addition, the CITY may at any time reduce the scope of this Agreement. Such reduction in some shall be set forth in written notice from the CITY to the CONSULTANT. In the event of unresolved dispute over change in scope or charged conditions, this agreement may also be terminated. In the event of termination, all documents finished or unfinished, prepared by the CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall be made available by the CONSULTANT to the CITY pursuant to Article 8, and there shall be no further Obligation of the CITY to the CONSULTANT under this Agrreement, except for payment of amounts due and owing for work performed and expenses incurred to the date and time of termination, computed in accordance with Article 4. In the event of a reduction in scope of the PROJECT work, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for the work performed and expenses incurred on the PROJECT work thus reduced or on any completed and abandoned work, computed in accordance with Article 4. Any reduction in the "not to exceed" payment figure shall be established by a Supplemental Agreement entered into by both parties. ARTICLE 8. DISPOSITION OF PLAN, REPORTS AND OTHER nkrA At the time of completion or termination of the work, the CONSULTANT shall make available to the CITY all maps, tracings, reports, resource materials and other docaments pertaining to the work or to the PROJECT. All such documents are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by the CITY or others on extensions of the PROJECT or any other project. Any such renqP without written verification or adaptation by the OONSULTANT for the specific purpose intended will be at the CITY's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to the CONSULTANT. ARTICLE 9. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 9.10 Tb permit the CONSULTANT to perform the services required hereunder, the CITY shall supply, in proper time and sequence, the following at no expense to the CONSULTANT. 9.10.1 Provide all necessary information regarding its requirements as necessary for orderly progress of the work. All known requirements are set forth in Exhibit A. 9.10.2 Designate in writing a person to act as CITY'S representative with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement. Such person Shall have authority to transmit instructions, receive instructions, receive ( information, and interpret and define CITY's policies with respect to the CONSULTANP's services. 9.10.3 Furnish, as required for performance of the COMULTANT services (except to the extent provided otherwise in Exhibit A), existing data prepared by or services of others, including existing background information such as hage napping, air photos, topography, soils, plat napping, parcel characteristics, ownership, traffic patterns, utility napping and sizing, tax data, community planning and demographic data which the CITY has available. 9.10.4 Provide access to and make all provision for the CONSULTANT to enter upon publicly owned property as required to perform the work. 9.10.5 Act as liaison with other agencies to carry out necessary coordination and negotiations. 9.10.6 Examine all reports, Sketches, drawings, specifications, and other documents prepared and presented by the CONSULTANT, obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor or others as the CITY deems necessary for such examination, and render in writing, decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of the CONSULTANT. 9.10.7 Give prompt written notice to the CONSULTANT whenever the CITY observes or otherwise becomes aware of any development that affects the scope of timing of the CONSULTANT's services or any defect in work of the CONSULTANT. 9.10.8 Provide a meeting place and notification for meetings described in Exhibit A. 9.10.9 Provide other services, materials or data as may be set forth in Exhibit A. 9.11 The CONSULTANT shall be entitled to rely on the accuracy of completeness of information furnished by the CITY. If the CONSULTANT finds that any information furnished by the CTTY is in error or is inadequate for its purpose, the CONSULTANT shall promptly notify the CITY. APTICIF 10. ASSIGNMENT This Agreement, being intended to secure the personal service of the individuals employed by and through whom the CONSULTANT performs work hereunder, shall not be aq.signed, sublet or transferred, except to the above designated subconsultant, without the written consent of the CTTY. BY: BY: BY: BY: ATTEST: In 1;TINE33 WNEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this141-r-.e.--rten€ the day and year first above written. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA (pq 0 EXHIBIT A. SCOPE OF SERVICES TASK 1: REVIEW CCHHUNITY CHARACTERISTICS AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION Objective: Tb review, research and document projected Eden Prairie growth trends and demographics. Discussion: Eden Prairie's population is increacing rapidly with continued population growth projected in the next two decades. Significant growth will also occur for industrial development and expansion of commercial uses. The community's diverse land use, physical characteristics and transportation corridors are integral conponents to evaluating existing park developments and responding to the existing population base and future demographic changes. This task's purpose is to provide an information base from which the needs analysis can be cempleted. Subtasks include: A. Review and analyze background peculation and demographic information relating to the park plan. - Analyze demographic information (U.S. Census, school district data, etc.) for information on age groups, concentrations of special populations, etc. - Meet with Planning Department staff to review development trends and projected growth areas. Also discuss regulations, ordinances and procedures that will have an effect on park and natural resources including park dedication and resource protection requirements. - Analyze existing conditions, trends and plans to show type, timing and intensity of any development planned. Based upon development, trends can be interpreted to indicate areas where demand for recreation resources will be high, and where unique natural features may be appropriate for recreational use. Special populations, such as athletic associations, may be identified which influence recreational needs. B. Discussion of physical features, history and other features of Eden Prairie and the surrounding area that helped to shape the city. Degree to which Eden Prairie provides services to neighboring communities and outlying areas--zone of influence. C. Community synopsis and definition of neighborhoods. Discussion of features in particular that have directed and shaped the city into subareas which can later be analyzed for recreation needs. Items to be considered include land-use trends and the rate of develophnt; the transportation network including highways as well as local roads; other community changes, such as retail construction; social perceptions of neighborhoods and wards; and man-made and natural barriers. D. History of the Park and Recreation Department. Discussion of the history of the park and recreation department staffing, growth, change in emphasis, budget and programming. Analysis of the evolution of the parks department will establish a context for camparison with present and projected needs Task Product: A chapter sumnarizing existing written documentation digrnicsing background information important to assessing recreation needs. Population Characteristics will be described and geographical subunits of the city will be illustrated. Client Involvement: A. Assist in collecting and analyzing census and demographic information - Planning Department community growth trends, facts and figures - School district census information and growth projections - Available demographic data and growth projections from the Metropolitan Council Other information pertaining to camamity profile B. Assist in identifying factors which may influence community growth or change - Planning Department information pertaining to community zoning, land use and land absorption C. Assist in identifying and analyzing community planning neighborhoods - Historical information and planning projections on neighborhaxl growth and population characteristics - Commudty roadway plan: existing and proposed - Assistance in determining logical neighborhood areas D. Review and comment on draft chapter TASK 2: INVENTORY OF =STING PARK AND ROJREATION FAciLatiES Objective: To inventory and analyze park and recreation facilities that influence Eden Prairie. Discussion: Eden Prairie has an existing park and open space system based upon parcels which vary in size and facility development. In addition, the community has access to nearby state, regional and private park and open space facilities. The inventory process will: A. Locate and inventory federal, state, regional, municipal or private park and open space facilities which immediately abut or are in close proximity to the community. B. Inventory and assess developed community and neighborhood parks and other special use areas. The profile will include concise narrative descriptions and discussion of: size, (acres) - physical features such as topography, water bodies, vegetation, focal points, etc. general character of the park and its role (pagsive, active, etc.) detail of facilities: type, quantity, state of repair, etc. degree and type of use special problems such as incompatible adjacent land ImPc; noise, safety or traffic problems; vandalism; maintenance problems; water quality, etc. C. Inventory and assess presently undeveloped parks and potential recreation or open space areas within Eden Prairie. Discussion for principal parcels will include: - size and shape of parcel and its potential usA - dominant physical features - general site character - status of pending plans or proposals for its use - special planning considerations such as adjacent land use, safety barriers, etc. suggestion of possible uses suitable for the site D. Describe public trails currently used for bicycles and pedestrians, and unofficial corridors such as utility assessments. E. General dirilgsion of public indoor recreation facilities, terms of ownership and use, facilities included, degree of use, general character, special concerns. F. General discussion of historical and conservation areas wfthin or abutting the city, their present facilities, and the role they serve in overall recreation needs, special concerns, etc. G. General discussion of indoor and outdoor facilities at schools and churches, and the degree to which they are used or are available for use by citizens. Opportunities and astacles to cooperative use and programming. H. Inventory and discussion of privat.e/cammercial recreation facilities and the role of caranercial recreation in meeting local needs. The inventory will include a description of facilities, programs, limitations on public use (i.e., member ally) fee structure. Task Product: A comprehensive inventory of all city park and recreation resources including a profile sheet digrimsing each park site. A written summary of all other recreation resources serving Eden Prairie, describing facilities, access and availability for public use, both current and anticipated. Client Involvement: A. Identify agencies and groups providing park and recreation B. Inventory of all existing facilities on an individual facility and system-wide basis C. Provide site has,. mapping, aerial photos and other map information for the community and individual facilities D. Assist in interviewing park or government agencies or groups providing recreation facilities E. Other community facilities tl TASK 3; 00-riTTVE NEEDS ANALYSD3/010fikari SURVEN Objective: 'lb determine Eden Prairie's existing and future park and recreation facility needs based upon a variety of analysis methodologies. Discussion: Eden Prairie's needs analysis will have a multi-faceted approach to provide a comprehensive review of the community's park and recreation needs. Each methodology has its awn specific analysis strengths and, in turn, will reveal inadequacies which another method may fail to acknowledge. Analysis methodologies will include: A. Comparison With Accepted Standards. General standards relating proportions of park land and facilities to the porkaation, as well as suggesting facility service areas, may be useful in evaluating the overall adequacy of the park and recreation system. The "standards approach" is a useful tool in stimulating further analysis, not substituting for it, and Should be used in accordance with other demand analysis measures. B. Interview Key Parsons. Private interviews may be conducted with key community citizens who have specific interest in park, recreation and athletics. These interviews promote carrunication and insights as to the performance of existing facilities and procedures. Perceived needs and constructive comments which may not surface in a public forum are often identified. Interview candidates may include: - community education, school district personnel or private education groups - athletic association representatives - city officials including the park's maintenance director, Park and Recreation Commission and planning staff - city council members The city may suggest other Eden Prairie citizens for Barton-Aschman interviews. Up to five telephone interviews could be conducted. C. Survey and Cuestionnaire. Preparation of a survey or questionnaire and its application will be closely coordinated with staff so that pertinent information is collected in a valid and reliable manner. The most critical element of survey design and methodology is determining the information to be sought. TO be useful, surveys need to be carefully designed to minimize bias and solicit the information desired. The sample must be selected in a valid manner to ensure representative results, and the data must be interpreted in a manner that is useful and reliable. D. Facility Assessment. A facility assessment will be made based on information fram Tasks 1 and 2. This analysis will review those existing park and recreation develament deficiencies on an existing neighborhood and community facility basis which were identified through the inventory tasks. We suggest that a determination of format, scope, etc. for a survey design be postponed until after the inventory and general assessment is underway. Eden Prairie currently has a population of approximately 30,000 residents and 7,500 to 8,000 households. Based upon these figures, a sampling of approximately 200 would provide comprehensive information fram which conclusions can be drawn. Samplings over and above the 200 should be considered as insurance, that is, verifying the conclusions. A survey will be developed with the assistance of Eden Prairie staff. The survey will be designed for inclusion to and distribution within the city's newsletter pUblication. The City of Eden Prairie will be responsible for the survey's retrieval either by return mail or drop off locations. Resolution Inc. will tabulate up to 200 random survey units. Additional surveys can be tAhnlated at the city's request at a cost of $1.50 per sample. Task Products: A chapter will be produced which summarizes the needs analysis, including: A. Existing and projected 5- and 10-year park needs. The analysis will show city-wide needs, as well as neighborhood or planning subarea needs B. Adequacy of existing and planned facilitieS in terms of ancpcs, location and usability. C. Identify special lice facility needs and probable timing of need. D. Identify needs for future park development or redevelopment. E. Verify community existing or future need for a city-owned golf course based upon population, demcgraphics, community interest and nearby competition. F. Formulation and tabulation of camunity-wide survey based upon 200 sample units. Client Involvement: A. Participation in survey formulation, conduction and tabulation B. Participation in needs analysis TARR 4: REVIEW AND UPDATE PARR AND NATURAL RESOURCF POLICIES Objective: lb review and revise or formulate basic community park and natural resource policies. Discussion: This task focuses on policy issues which Eden Prairie should formulate, or review and revise as needed, previous to park facility expansion. Typical issues which Barton-Ascrunan could assist in reviewing may include: - existing goads and policies relating to the park system and trail system - the roles and interrelationships among various recreation providers in Eden Prairie - potential funding mechanisms and oppcmtunities - review the park dedication requirement involving developer land dedication and/or fee - preservation of natural resources A. Review and evaluate existing goals and objectives from the Comprehensive Plan and other doctrnents relating to the Eden Prairie Park System. B. Review the roles and relationships between the various recreation providers serving Eden Prairie residents, such as: city, school districts, county or state agencies, quasi-public agencies, or private organizations. C. Develop suggested criteria for determining acquisition and development priorities. Criteria might include such factors as: - availability or adequacy of existing facilities - population to be served - time frame of need; present vs. projected need - potential method of implementation (dedication, grant, bond issues, cooperative agreements, etc.) D. Assist staff in reviewing and revising existing policy pertaining to natural resource preservation. - steep slopes - unique or unusual vegetation - water body shoreline - wetlands 1,0 E. Map existing natural resource areas whidh have been purckased or preserved. F. Identify and map unique or unusual natural resource areas for preservation. Task Product: Chapters summarizing policy and criteria issues to consider for revision or development. Client Involvement: A. Assist in identifying specific natural resource categories for preservation B. Assist in review and formulation of policies C. Assist in identifying unique or unusual parcels for preservation 6 ? TASK 5: CcHNUNTTY TRAILS PLAN Citective: TO re-establish a framework plan which delineates trail development for pedestrians, bicycles and other modes as appropriate. Discussion: Eden Prairie has made a formal camlitrent to establishing and developing nultimadal trail corridors. This task wculd complement the existing system based upon nqPr group origins, destinations, physical features and general design criteria. A need exists to evaluate the proposed trail corridors to determine if it is feasible and appropriate to develop trails in corridors, and if so, what corridors. A. Inventory physical and cultural features which influence trail development. Factors may include: - existing hikeway/bikeway trails - developed or proposed regional trails - significant barriers to future construction such as topographic, envirormental or cultural constraints - logical trip generators (origins) and trip destinations B. Review and revise establish goals and objectives for trail development. C. Review and revise location criteria to guide and evaluate trail corridors. D. Formulate schematic trail corridors for bicycles, pedestrians and other modes to complete Eden Prairie's trail system. E. Evaluate existing trails for design standards and reammend changes. F. Review and revise general design stutiards for each trail mode. Trail widths, surface materials and gradient constraints will be recommended. Task Products: AmmorarrhErt will be produced which summarizes and delineates: A. Factors influencing trail location B. Summary of trail goals and objectives and locational criteria C. Schematic framework plans delineatirg trail corridors for: 1. bicycles 2. pedestrians D. Summary of design standards E. Recommend improvements to existing trails Client Involvement: A. Assist in evaluating existing trail system adequacies and issues B. Assist in formulating the future trail links and plan C. Review consultant draft information ([C) TASK 6: ILLUSTRATIVE PARK MANS Objective: To prepare sketch plans which schematically organize elements for development, given identified site constraints. Discussion: This task will develop sketch plans for each park facility. Written descriptions or profiles will complement the sketches describing existing and proposed park development. A. Prepare has/. maps of park sites based upon existing topographic mapping and aerial photos. B. Identify function of park in terms of park classification, service area needs, user groups, etc. C. Analyze site characteristics and suitability for recreational development including size, slope and soils limitation, vegetation, adjacent land uses, access, and aesthetic considerations such as views, natural features, etc. D. Develop sketch plan at an 8-1/2" by 11" format for each park. The plan will portray general park layout relationships between activity areas and potential improvements. E. Parks will include: NEIGHECGROOD PARKS 1. Carmel 2. City Hall Site 3. Creekwocd 4. Edenvale 5. Eden Valley 6. Forest Hills 7. Frank) Road 8. Wyndham Knoll 9. Hidden Ponds 10. Homeward Hills 11. Lake Eden 12. Prairie East 13. Preserve 14. Prairie View 15. Red Rock 16. Westgate 17. Willow 18. Cedar Forest 19. Cedar Hills 20. Crestwood 21. Rice Marsh 22. Red Rock Lake COMMUNITY PARKS 1. Birch Island 2. Miller 3. Riley Lake 4. Round Lake 5. Staring Lake 6. Purgatory Creek Recreation Area 7. Bluff 8. Edenbrook AlliLETIC FIELC6 1. Flying Cloud Fields 2. Softball Field Complex Task Product: Sketch plans for the primary parks within the Eden Prairie system. Client Involvement: A. Provide haqP mapping and aerial photography with topography, major features and boundaries delineated B. Assist in reviewing park plans TASK 7: LIST OF PRIORITIES FOR AOXTISITION AND DEVELOPMENT Objective: To rank recanmerded land parcels for acquisition and/or developnent based upon community needs and priorities. Discussion: Eden Prairie has done a commendable job of preserving parcels for future development. -Advance acquisition based upon prudent planning permits park development at desirable locations, appropriate timing and within reasonable budgets. Early acquisition, however, requires foresight and a firm analysis. Community support may linger, biased by development-oriented projects. As a result, canmunity education is crucial to justify and build support for acquisition priorities. An analysis of existing park service areas will be instrumental in identifying those areas which are deficient in recreational facilities or services. All land earmarked for acquisition should have a specific purpose, and that which is designated for different types of uses must be usable (i.e., suitable topography) and sized to allow the intended use. Land acquired for park use in developing areas should be of a sufficient size to provide for future needs Candidate locations for a public golf course will be identified based upon size, physical characteristics and adjacent land use. Task Product: A list of prioritized land parcels for acquisition. Client Involvement: A. Input into acquisition and development schedule S. Review and comment on draft consultant material TASK 8: CAPITAL 11{P1OVENENIS PLAN (C.I.P.) Cbjective: Tb outline a specific course of action for implementing priority park and recreation system capital improvements for a 5-year period, with projected needs for a 10-year capital improvements program outlined. Discussion: Based upon the physical improvements outlined in the plan, projected costs will be scheduled into a capital improvements program. Steps include: A. Determine format for capital improvements program in use by City of Eden Prairie. B. Determine cost estimates for priority projects. C. Incorporate information from city budget and other revenue sources and project a realistic capital improvement investment strategy for 5-year period. Seven basic methods which will be considered include: - park dedication fund - general revenues - city taxes - bonding - general Obligation and revenue bonds - fees and rentals - surplus earnings - transfer from other public works - state and federal aid - donations or gifts D. Project capital improvement needs for a 10-year period and relative time and cost framework for their implementation (intermediate and long-term needs). Teak Products: Five-yPar priority capital improvements program. Ten-year framework for projected capital improwament needs. Client Involvement: A. Tabulation of annual revenue sources, existing and projected B. Prioritization of expenditures C. Review and comment of C.I.P. TASKS): rMINW/TOWILIENVITION Objective: 'lb solicit meaningful public comment on the park plan and its priorities. A. Forums will be conducted to involve the city's 21 planning neighborhoods. Four meetings will be conducted with four to six neighborhoods invited to eadh. After an initial presentation, a working group will convene to specifically diqinms neighborhood needs and desires. B. Four meetings will be conducted with the park commission. C. One presentation will be made to the planning commission. D. One presentation will be made to the city council. E. A three-ring binder format will be used to "house" chapters of the plan. Staff-generated chapters which currently exist in draft form will be reviewed and revised to be consistent with the overall plan format. Other currently non-existent chapters will be generated by Barton-Aschman. The outline contained within Appendix Swill guide the documents contents. One hundred three-ring binders will be developed. Task Products: A. Public participation B. Final domment in three-ring binder format (100 copies) Client Involvement: A. Meeting coordination, sdheduling and participation B. Document review EKRIBIT B. DRAM! TABLE OF cowarrs EDEN PRAIRIE OCKPREHENSIVE PARK AND RECREATION PLAN This exhibit is a draft outline to guide the planning study products. Changes and alterations may be made if technical issues encountered during the process dictate so or if reorganization of the Chapters provides a better quality document. I BASE DATA AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION Introduction Importance of Recreation History and Physical Character of Eden Prairie Socioeconomic Profile Population Projections Age Profile Income Data Neighborhood Areas Overview of Eden Prairie Park Recreation Deparbnent II INVENDORY OF EXISTING PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES Federal, State, Regional or Abutting Municipal Facilities Inventory and Profile Existing Eden Prairie Facilities Identify Areas for Potential Park Development Identify Existing Historical or Conservation Areas Identify Private Facilities Open to the Public III RECREATION NEEDS AND DEMAND ANALYSIS Cmparison to Accepted Standards Recreation Facility Service Standards Analysis of Service Areas Golf Course Need Neighborhood Forums Survey IV GOALS AND POLICIES - GENERAL Introduction Role of Recreation Providers Park Development and Redevelopment Policies Land Acquisition Policies Financial Policies V GOALS AND POLILutS - NATURAL RESOURCES Natural Resource Policies - Tree Ctver - Steep Slopes - Shorelines - Wetlands Natural Resource Areas - Preserved Unique Natural Resource Areas - FUture Preservation VI COMMUNITY TRAILS EXisting Trails and Pathways Adjacent Community or Other Agency Interconnecting Trails Goals, Policies and Location Criteria Trail System Schematics - Pedestrian and Bicycle Design Standards - Pedestrian and Bicycle VII ILUJSTRATIVE PARK PLANS Neighborhood Parks (22) Community Parks (8) Athletic Fields (2) VIII ACQUISITION AND CEVEDPVENT PRIORITMS Parcels for Acquisition and Develagrent Other Recommended Improvements Need for Other Activities IX CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Potential Funding Mechanisms Ten Year Capital Improvement Projections 7