HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 03/15/1988AGENDA
TUESDAY, MARCH 15, 1988
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia
Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to
the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director
John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris
Enger, Director of Community Services
Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works
Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary
Sue Anderson
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
A. Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, January 19 1988
B. Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 8, 1988
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Change Order No. 1 - Fire Station Contract-
C. Approval of Addendum to the Joint Powers South Suburban Adaptive
Recreation Board
D. Bergman Addition by Richard and Linda Bergman and Richard and
Marjorie Ziminske. Approval of Developer's Agreement for
Bergman Addition. (Location: South of Holly Road, east of
Rosemary Road)
E. AMOLUBE QUICK CHANGE. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 10-88,
Amending Ordinance No. 32-84-PUD-5-84 within the PUD-5-
Neighborhood-Commercial District; Approval of SuppleMent to
Developer's Agreement for Amoco Oil Company, and Adoption of
Resolution No. 88-38, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No.
10-88 and Ordering Publication of of Said Summary. Location:
Southeast quadrant of Anderson Lakes Parkway and Highway 169
F. Change Order No. 1 for Bluffs East 4th Addition, I.C. 52-096
Page 403
Page 424
Page 425
Page 427
Page 428
Page 432
Page 434
Page 441
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,March 15, 1988
G. Final Plat approval for Prairie Knoll 3rd Addition (located north Page 442 of Valley View Road and west of Ontario Boulevard) Resolution No. 88-37
H. Agreement between Raymond N. Welter, Jr. and Carole Ann Welter (owners) and the City of Eden Prairie regarding improvements to Blossom Road
I. Grading Permit for Steve Kohles to construct berm adjacent to Valley View Road on Lot 2 Block 3 Paulsen's Addition
J. ROGER'S AUTO BODY by Roger L. Lindeman. 2nd Reading of Ordinance
No. 44-87, Rezoning from Rural to 1-2; Approval of Developer's
Agreement for Roger's Auto Body; and Adoption of Resolution No.
88-40, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 44-87 and Ordering
Publication of Said Summary. Location: East of Highway 169,
south of Williams Mini-Storage)
K. Resolution No. 88-39 Commending the Eden Prairie High School
Girls Gymnastics Team for Winning the Minnesota State Htan
School "AA" Championship
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. A TO Z RENTAL. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to
C-Reg-Service on 1.67 acres with variances to be reviewed by the
Board of Appeals, Preliminary Plat of 3.59 acres into one lot and
one outlot, for construction of a 15,500 sq. ft. retail facility.
Location: Southwest corner of Valley View Road and Plaza Drive.
(Ordinance No. 13-88 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 88-36 - Preliminary
Plat)
B. YEAR XIV COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ALLOCATION (Resolution
No. 88-35)
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
IX. APPOINTMENTS
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
B. Report of City Manager
1. Award Uniform Contract
2. City Hall Financing Options
3. 1-494 EIS Agreement
C. .Port of City Attorney
Page 445
Page 449
Page 451
Page 458
Page 459
Page 469
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 478
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,March 15, 1988
D. Report of Director of Planning
E. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Recommendations on Advertisement for Bid for 2nd Phase of the
Community Center Repair Project
2. Staring Lake Park Improvements
3. Recommendation on Operating Policies for Riley Lake Park
4. Recommendation on Name Change for Community Services
Department
F. Report of Director of Public Works
G. Report of Finance Director
XI, NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Page 491
Page 492
Page 495
Page 498
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JANUARY 19, 1988 7:30 PM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and
Patricia Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Asst. to
the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Director of
Planning Chris Enger, Director of
Community Services Robert Lambert,
Director of Public Works Eugene A.
Dietz, and Recording Secretary Sue
Anderson.
ROLL CALL: All members were present.
PRESENTATION: Mayor Peterson presented recognition plaques and
certificates to Ron Funk and Robert Mjolsness for ten
years of service to the Police Reserve Unit.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following items were added to the Agenda: X.B.1. Discussion of City Manager Review Form; X.A.1. Update Council on the Intergovernmental Affairs Committee of the Regional
Rail Authority Meeting.
MOTION:
Harris moved, seconded by Bentley to approve the Agenda and
Other Items of Business, as published and amended. Motion
carried unanimously.
II. MINUTES
A. Regular City Council meeting held Tuesday, December 1,
1987 (continued from January 5, 1988).
The following changes were made: Page 10 MOTION: shall read Bentley moved, seconded by Peterson. Page 10, Paragraph 2: shall read: Harris stated after hearing the report on pay
equity, it was apparent that the City is in a good competitive
position in the current market since the Manager's salary is
only 1.6% from the market value. The City should however
encourage continued good performance by the City Manager
through a 3% economic adjustment plus 2% financial incentive to
bring the Manager even with the market. Page 11, after Paragraph 10 insert: Harris expressed her concern on the
Eden Prairie City Council -2- January 19, 1988
demographic information not adequately reflecting the current
status of Eden Prairie and therefore impossible to project
ridership.
MOTION:
Harris moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Minutes of
the Regular City Council meeting held Tuesday, December 1,
1987, as published and amended. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Special City Council meeting held Tuesday, December 22,
1987 (continued from January 6, 1988)
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris, to approve the Minutes of
the Special City Council meeting held Tuesday, December 22,
1987, as published. Motion carried unanimously.
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 4-88, amending City Code Section 5.37 by amending Section 5.37, Subd. 5 which defines the word "Peddler"
B. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 9-88, amending City Code Sec. 2.05 Subd. 3 Relating to the Payment for Attendance of Meetings by the Mayor and Council.
C. Set Special City Council meeting for 5:30 PM on Tuesday, February 9 1988 at City Hall for the purpose of interviewing candidates for boards and commissions
D. Set Board of Review meeting for Thursday, April 28 1988 at 7:30 PM
E. SHADY OAK RIDGE 3RD ADDITION, (AKA Shady Oak Ridge 2nd Addition) by Joe Ruzic. 2nd Reading of Ordinance #59-87,
Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 0.19
acres and Zoning District Amendment within the R1-13.5 on
0.19 acres and Zoning District Amendment within the R1-
13.5 District on 2.88 acres; Approval of Developer's
Agreement for Shady Oak Ridge 3rd Addition; and Approval
of Resolution No. 88-12, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance
No. 59-87 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 3.08
acres into 4 single family lots. Location: West of Old
Shady Oak Road, north of Rowland Road (Ordinance No. 59-
87 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 88-12 - Authorizing Summary
and Publication)
F. 1st Reading of Ordinance #1-88, Amending City Code
Chapter 2, Section 2.11, Subdivisions 3 and 4, Which Set the Time Period for Council Review and Citizen Appeal for Board of Appeal Actions.
Eden Prairie City Council -3- January 19, 1988
G. 1st Reading of Ordinance #2-88 Amending City Code
Chapter Section 7.01, Which Updates Reference to 1987
State Traffic Law.
H. 1st Reading of Ordinance #3-88 Amending City Code
Chapter 12, Section 12.03 Subdivision 17 Which Updates
the Definition of Subdivision, and Section 12.40 which
Deletes Old Language on Types of Subdivisions for Which
City Can Require Parkland Dedication.
I. Wyndham Knoll Special Assessment Agreement Release
J. Bluffs West 5th Addition Special Assessment Agreement Release
K. Final Plat approval for Shady Oak Ridge 2nd Addition (located north of Rowland Road and west of Old Shady Oak
Road) Resolution No. 88-17
L. Final Plat approval for Gopher Lane Addition (located north of Pioneer Trail and west of Staring Lane)
Resolution No. 88-18
M. Approve plans prepared by Hennepin County for a traffic
control signal system at the intersection of Prairie Center Drive with County State Aid Highway 39 (Valley
View Road) Resolution No. 88-20
N. Approve cooperative construction agreement with Hennepin
County for construction of a traffic control signal
system at the intersection of Prairie Center Drive with
County state Aid Highway 39 (Valley View Road) Resolution
No. 88-21
O. Approve plans prepared by Hennepin Gounty for improve-
ments to County State Aid Highway No. 4 between Westgate Drive and Terrey Pine Hive (Resolution No. 88-22)
P. Approve cooperative construction agreement with Hennepin
County for improvements to County State Aid Highway No. 4
between Westgate Drive and Terrey17,in-J-Drive (Resolution No. 88-23)
Q. Approval of Eden Prairie Senior Center Change Order No. 6
R. Lot 1 Block 1 Shady Oak Industrial Park 6th Addition
Special Assessment Agreement Release.
MOTION:
Harris moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve Items A-R on
the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously.
Eden Prairie City Council
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. BLUFFS EAST 5TH ADDITION,
Corporation. Request for
Rural to R1-13.5 on 17.68
30.1 acres into 34 single
right-of-way. Location:
extension, west of Franlo
-4- January 19, 1988
by Hustad Development
Zoning District Change from
acres, and Preliminary Plat of
family lots, 3 outlots, and road
Southeast of Meade Lane
Road, northwest of Antlers
Ridge extension. (Ordinance #7-88, Rezoning; Resolution
#88-14, Preliminary Plat)
City Manager Jullie reported that notice of this public
hearing was sent to owners of 145 surrounding properties and
published in the January 6, 1988 issue of the Eden Prairie
News. The Developer requested zoning district change from
Rural to R1-13.5 on 17.68 acres and Preliminary Plat of 30.1
acres into 34 single-family lots and 3 outlots. The property
proposed is located west of Franlo Road, northwest of Antlers
Ridge extension, and southeast of Meade Lane extension. The
Developer withdrew his request for a public hearing by the
City Council which had been scheduled for November 17, 1987.
During the interim time, the unresolved issue of
providing sidewalks has been discussed by the Parks,
Recreation and Natural Resources Commission.
Bob Smith, Hedlund Engineering, representative for Hustad
Development, presented the preliminary plat and rezoning
proposal for the Bluffs East 5th Addition. He stated Phase II
would consist of 34 single family lots with average size being
18,370 sq.ft. Existing utilities have been established, and
sidewalk would begin at Wild Duck Pass connecting to Franlo
Road. He concluded that Developer is asking for approval of
the preliminary plat Phase II of the pua and rezoning from
Rural to R1-13.5.
City Planner Enger reported that this item was reviewed by
Planning Commission at the October 26th meeting and on a 5-0
vote recommended approval of platting and zoning subject to
recommendations in Planning Staff Report dated October 23,
1987. It was also recommended by Planning Commission that
plans be submitted depicting a by-pass lane and right-turn lane
on County Road 18 and constructed as required by Hennepin
County, details of which had yet to be worked out. Also
concurrent with the construction of the Bluff's East 5th
Addition, Developer shall install a temporary 2-inch thick
bituminous surface for Bluff Road. It is consistent with the
original Plan Unit Development for the Bluff Country PUD.
Director of Community Services Lambert reported that Developer
met with the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
on December 7 and 21, 1987. The majority of the discussion was
regarding sidewalks whereby it was recommended that no
Eden Prairie City council -5- January 19, 1988
sidewalks be required west of Wild Duck Pass on Bluff Road and
Antlers Ridge. Sidewalks would be required from County Road 18
west to Wild Duck Pass, then north to Franlo Road, that a
sidewalk be extended south on Antlers Ridge to the hard surface
trail for the creek crossing access, and that there be a 30
foot wide outlot between lots for the asphalt trail. This
recommendation was passed on a 6-0 vote.
Bentley inquired if Staff and Developer are in agreement with
the Parks and Recreation recommendation. Lambert responded
affirmatively.
Harris inquired to Smith how many lots were in the transition
zone. Smith replied 4 lots entirely, and 9 lots partially
within the zone, and 13 lots abutting the transition zone.
Anderson asked Smith what access was being proposed to enter
the park. Developer responded that a 20' wide easement would
go between two lots.
Pidcock inquired if the creek property, which was 100 feet on
either side of the creek and the outlot of Creek Knolls, that
had been promised as a gift had in fact been received. Lambert
responded negatively.
Pidcock asked if Bluffs West Outlot A had been donated.
Lambert responded that he believed that all the outlots north
of Creek Knolls through the area have been dedicated up to the
north end of the subdivision of Bluffs East 5th Addition. He
could not recall the status on Bluffs West Outlot B, but would
provide a list of donated and dedicated land if requested.
Lambert reported to Council that it was the Staff and
Commission's recommendation that there should be a 30 ft.
outlot between homes for the access trail, but Developer
requested a 20 ft. easement.
Peterson inquired what the implications were for 20 ft. versus
30 ft. Lambert responded that with large homes, 20 ft. was not
sufficient space to accommodate screening and landscaping. The
Commission approved 30 ft. easement on the basis that the
Developer return to Commission with plans for landscape and
screening,and if such plans indicate adequate landscape and
screening Commission would accept 20 ft. outlot. Without
actually reviewing the suggested plans, the Commission
recommended 30 ft. Lambert continued that at this point, they
had not been supplied plans.
Developer responded that the plans would be submitted with
final construction package.
There were no further comments from the audience.
Eden Prairie City Council -6- January 19, 1988
MOTION 1:
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to close the
p
u
b
l
i
c
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
.
Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION 2:
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to approve 1st
R
e
a
d
i
n
g
o
f
Ordinance No. 7-88 for Rezoning. Motion carried
u
n
a
n
i
m
o
u
s
l
y
.
MOTION 3:
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to adopt Resol
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
8
8
-
14 approving the Preliminary Plat. Motion carri
e
d
u
n
a
n
i
m
o
u
s
l
y
.
MOTION 4:
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to direct Staf
f
t
o
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
a
Development Agreement incorporating Commission a
n
d
S
t
a
f
f
Recommendations with the final decision on the si
d
e
w
a
l
k
i
s
s
u
e
per the most recent Parks, Recreation and Natural
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Commission Recommendations including 20 ft. outl
o
t
w
i
t
h
5
f
t
.
easement for drainage and utility on each side.
M
o
t
i
o
n
c
a
r
r
i
e
d
unanimously.
Anderson commented further that he did not like t
h
e
t
r
a
i
l
outlot being placed between lots. Until he views
a
b
e
t
t
e
r
p
l
a
n
or a recommendation from Staff, recommendation sh
o
u
l
d
s
t
a
n
d
a
t
30 ft.
Peterson stated that the Council was not adverse
t
o
t
h
e
2
0
f
t
.
outlot but was very concerned about screening and
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
o
n
a
steep slope.
C. CREEKVIEW, Brown Land Company. Request for Planned Unit
Development Concept on 78.22 acres, Planned Uni
t
Development District Review on 78.22 acres with v
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
s
,
Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 6
0
.
1
5
acres, Preliminary Plat of 78.22 acres into 93 si
n
g
l
e
family lots and 2 outlots. Location: South of B
l
u
f
f
s
E
a
s
t
4th Addition, north of River View Road. (Resol
u
t
i
o
n
#
8
8
-
15, PUD Concept; Ordinance #8-88-PUD-1-88, PUD
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
Review and Rezoning; Resolution #88-16, Prelimin
a
r
y
P
l
a
t
)
Jullie reported that the notice of public hearin
g
w
a
s
s
e
n
t
t
o
owners of 69 surrounding properties and publishe
d
i
n
t
h
e
January 6, 1988 issue of the Eden Prairie News.
T
h
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
is seeking PUD District Review and Preliminary P
l
a
t
o
n
7
8
.
2
2
acres and Zoning District Change from Rural to R
1
-
1
3
.
5
o
n
6
0
.
1
5
acres for a subdivision with 93 single-family lo
t
s
a
n
d
2
outlots. The location of property is south of B
l
u
f
f
s
E
a
s
t
4
t
h
Addition and north of Riverview Road. This issu
e
h
a
s
h
a
d
extensive review by Staff and advisory commissio
n
s
o
v
e
r
t
h
e
past few months.
MICHAEL GAIR, Site Designer Planning Consultant f
o
r
C
r
e
e
k
v
i
e
w
,
stated his purpose was to provide City Council wi
t
h
c
r
e
d
i
b
l
e
information in order to make a decision on the re
q
u
e
s
t
b
e
f
o
r
e
Eden Prairie City Council -7- January 19, 1988
them. He introduced and gave credentials of the following
individuals who were available for questions regarding the
project: Peter Knaeble-Project Manager, Brian Olson-Landscape
Architect, Ron Krueger-Land Surveyor, Don Brauer-former
Consultant Planner for Eden Prairie and author of Purgatory
Creek Study, Tom Goodman-Attorney representing applicant, Terry
Schultz-Residential Designer & Architect, David Brown-Applicant,
Wayne Brown-Applicant, Bob Wilkie-former owner of property in
question, and Jim Wilkie-former owner of property in question.
Gair's presentation covered four items: 1) introduction of the
project with the aid of several exhibits giving background;
2) presentation of the plan that had been reviewed and
presented to Commission and City Staff at earlier dates; 3)
presentation of alternative options and/or layouts of the plan;
4) presentation of characteristics of the Purgatory Creek
Development from County Road 1 to Riverview Road via an aerial
slide tour.
In giving a recap of the proposed development, Gair worked from
Exhibit A showing land use for 78 acres; Exhibit B indicated
the Purgatory Creek Study detailing 100-year flood plain, the
conservancy line and transition zone; Exhibit C showing
existing site feature of creek corridor and creek valley floor;
Exhibit D featured soils map indicating different soils and
slopes; Exhibit E showing site use concept plan for public
domain, scenic easement and upland area development, Exhibit F indicated a plat concept that took into consideration all of
the concerns in the Purgatory Creek Study.
Gair, speaking to Plan 1 dated October 28, 1987 which included
93 lots, indicated that as a result of review and recommenda-
tions by Planning Commission, Lot No. 5 was removed eliminating
the creek crossing request. The private cul-de-sac was pulled
back 350' in order to move it out of the conservancy. With the
revisions, applicant's proposal was reduced to 92 lots with
modifications and a 4.6-acre dedication to the City.
Due to the legitimate concerns from residents and City Staff
regarding the recommendation for approval of the subdivision,
the applicant prepared an alternative plan, called Plan 1A,
which consisted of moving the east-west road 30 ft. further
south up and away from the transition zone and woodland area.
This would cut two lots from the core area. The shift of road
would increase the depth of the building pad.
Another plan alternative, called Plan 1B, which came about late
in the week of January 11th, indicated moving the east-west
road along the tree line well out of the tree line and created
two cul-de-sacs for access to lots. This roadway required
nominal grading and the two cul-de-sacs would be built on
present grade. There would be no excavation up to tree line,
and no loss of trees in the conservancy zone.
Eden Prairie City Council -8- January 19, 1988
Gair summarized the three plans as follows: Plan 1 called for
93 lots with an average lot size of 22,000 sq.ft. with 8.6%
tree alteration; Plan lA called for 89 lots with an average lot
size of 23,000 sq.ft. with 7.46% alteration; Plan 1B is further
modified with 87 lots with an average lot size of 24,000 sq.ft.
with 6.39% possible alteration.
He compared lots in the transition area with similar developers
in Purgatory Creek indicating the proposed project was less
intrusive than others, that they in fact had a greater
percentage of lots in the conservancy zone. This subdivision
request was not any more aggressive than any in the past for the
Purgatory Creek area, and in fact was now less aggressive and a
greater distance from the creek area.
An aerial slide tour of the area was presented so Council and
audience could experience aerial and ground shot experiences of
the impact of the previous developments and the proposed
development.
Peterson requested Developer move along rapidly with the
comparative material so Council could hear the subject
material.
Gair continued in summation stating that applicant had
addressed the concerns of: 1) there are no rule changes/
aggressiveness was eliminated by less tree loss and grading;
2) conservancy intrusion eliminated with road pulled back as in
Plan 1B. The two lots in the conservancy are are left natural
- no roads or intrusion; 3) violation of transition area has
been corrected and plans indicate fewer lots than in any other
comparable subdivision; 4) infringement of the rim was no more
extensive than other developments; 5) storm water run-off
concern would be handled through proper engineering design; 6)
tree loss has been reduced in alternative Plan 18; 7) soils/
erosion/steep slopes issues have been addressed in the soil
evaluation; and 8) grading of the site was less in the
alternative Plan 1B.
DON BRAUER spoke on the Purgatory Creek Study, its history and
how it was developed. It was not the intent of the City to
dictate to developers but give a guideline to preserve the
resources of the City. He has looked at this plan and felt it
was not more intrusive and actually appeared to be less so than
other developments that occured on the unvegetated south facing
slope.
Director of Planning Enger reported that the Planning
Commission heard this proposal at its November 9th meeting for
information purposes and at the December 14th meeting reviewed
the plan for 93 lots and made recommendation for approval
subject to Staff Recommendations to the plans dated Ootober 28,
Eden Prairie City Council -9- January 19, 1988
1987 which suggested changes to the Developer concerning tree
loss and lots in the conservancy area. Enger summarized the
more recent Staff Report Recommendations dated December 11,
1987 as follows: Prior to City Council review, Developer
shall: 1) submit a tree replacement plan based on 1,711
caliper diameter inches of trees for Staff review. The
majority of trees should be oak. Since that time there has
been concern of the accuracy of the overall tree inventory.
Stuart Fox, City Forester, had done an extensive independent
study of the forested area using State Department agricultural
tables as an empirical method and through extensive random
field plots done across the entire wooded area, he was prepared
to respond to questions. The overall amount of trees found on
the site was about the same as originally reported by Developer,
and tree loss was somewhat less than on original inventory due
to modification of the plans.
Continuing on with Staff Report Recommendations: Prior to Final
Plat approval, Developer shall: 1) submit detailed storm water
run-off, erosion control, and utility plans for review by the
City Engineer and Watershed District. Prior to Buildin Permit issuance, Developer shall: 1) Pay the appropriate cash park fee
paid on this property and would not be waived with land donation;
2) notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in
advance of grading; 3) provide an eight-foot wide trail easement
to the City along the private road to Purgatory Creek. Prior to
any grading on the property, Developer shall stake the proposed
grading limits with a snow fence. Any trees lost outside the
construction area shall be replaced inch per inch. Said construc-
tion fencing shall remain on-site until after an occupancy
permit has been issued on a lot by lot basis. Comply with a
requirement for constructing an eight-foot wide bituminous trail
along the north side of Riverview Road with a connection to the
private road concurrent with street construction.
Lambert reported that Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
Commission reviewed this proposal at the December 21st meeting
along with the Planning Staff Recommendations. The majority of
the meeting dealt with the concern of the tree removal which
resulted in approving the recommendation of the Planning Staff
to approve the Creekview Subdivision. An amendment to that
motion recommended that Council consider an independent party
conduct a tree inventory on the entire site. This motion
passed with a vote of 6-0. Lambert noted that the City
Forester conducted an inventory, but the City did not engage an
outside party to do an additional inventory.
Bentley inquired if Staff had adequate time to review Plan 18
based upon previous criteria recommended.
Enger responded that Plan 18 was very much the same as the
original plan except for the ridge area. Staff had been working with the Developer to modify and pull the street away
LI
Eden Prairie City Council -10- January 19, 1988
from the conservancy area, so when the proposal came in with
alterations it was a direct response to specific suggestions
made by the City Staff and Staff was comfortable with Plan 1B.
Bentley inquired why the road to the conservancy area would be
a private drive, and would it be built according to City
standards? Enger answered that the driveway was originally
proposed as a public road to the creek bottom. Staff felt it
caused a disruption in the area because of right-of-way grading
requirements. When Developer finally reduced the area to two
lots at the bottom of the road, it was recommended that a
private drive would be less intrusive than a public road. The
City has done this for some lots in the past, and this proposal
preserves the topographic and vegetation features. The main
differences between a private drive and a public road would be
the private drive width of 26', no concrete curb, and the
elimination of the 11 ft. boulevard on each side of the road.
Bentley stated it should be understood that the private drive
would not be maintained by the City, and inquired as to who
would maintain this road. Developer responded that homeowners
would maintain the road.
Bentley asked City Attorney Pauly to report and advise Council
regarding a letter received at 3:00 PM this day from the MEQB
petitioning for an environmental assessment worksheet
on the proposed development.
Pauly stated that the communication from the Minnesota
Environmental Quality Board petitioning for an EAW was a
procedure that has to be followed when twenty-five persons sig
n
a petition to request an environmental study. The EQB evaluate
s
and determines the credibility of the petition and forwards it
on to the City in question. This particular petition had only
12 signatures and Pauly was unable to reach Mr. Gregg Downing
o
r
his assistant to determine if there were in fact 25 signatures
on this petition.
Pauly continued that the RGU (Responsible Governmental Unit-the
City of Eden Prairie in this case) determines if the evidence
presented by the petitioners and the proposer demonstrates that
the location or nature of the project may have a potential for.
significant environmental effects. The City may deny the
petition if the evidence presented fails to demonstrate that th
e
project may have the potential for significant environmental
effects.
Pauly stated the legal alternatives and procedures if the
project has the potential for significant environmental effects.
If the Council determines that the project does not have such
potential, it could so decide at this time, and address the
issues of the rezoning and the preliminary plat. The Council ma
y
Eden Prairie City Council -11- January 19, 1988
also continue the hearing to a future date to make a
determination whether the proposal may have a potential for
significant environmental effects.
Peterson inquired if it was in the jurisdiction of the Council
to determine the potential of significant environmental effects
on the project.
Bentley stated that Council could take action presently to
determine if there was potential for significant environmental
effects, if there was a need for a study, or continue this
hearing and make a determination at a later date.
Pidcock, looking at proposed Plan 1B, inquired if Staff saw a
potential for significant environmental effects resulting from
the revised plan.
Enger responded that given a measure of potential significant
impact comparable to other like projects established by past
City review procedures, and given revisions proposed in Plan 1B,
and given adherence to proper construction, tree protection,
grading and erosion control procedures, there was not potential
for significant environmental impact.
Pidcock stated that if the project has no environmental effect
the MEQB worksheet was not necessary.
MOTION 1:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris that the proposed development
has no potential for significant environmental effects.
Peterson stated the Council would hear evidence from the
petitioners and others and tabled the motion.
WALLY HUSTAD, JR., 9746 Mill Creek Drive, stated that the
people in opposition are not against the development but
instead are concerned citizens that want the least amount of
impact on the area. He described the impact on Plan 1, Plan
1A, and Plan 1B. He continued that he did not agree with City
Planning Staff and Commission that this should be recommended
for approval and they should reconsider. He did state that
Plan 1B was the most sensitive to the area. Hustad felt the
point was to find a plan that Developer and residents could
live with. He stated the changes to date would not have come
about without the intervention of the residents. He said the
more aggressive plan was recommended by Staff, and was a gross
error on the performance of the Staff in recommending approval
of this project; and •tated Staff of turning this into a
debate for developer vs. developer.
Peterson interjected at this point and stated that this was not
a forum to criticize the Staff. If anyone has criticism, he or
she should arrange a meeting with him or the City Manager.
Eden Prairie City Council -12- January 19, 1988
Council would not tolerate any more criticism of staff at this
hearing. Other Councilmembers affirmed his sentiments.
Bentley clarified the situation stating that Plan 1 was
recommended for approval by the Planning Commission based on
recommendations from Staff; and stands behind Staff and
Commission. He further commented that as far as he was
concerned Plan 1 was dead, Plan lA was dead, and Plan 1B was
the plan to discuss from this point on in the hearing.
WOODY GINKEL, 10430 Whitetail Crossing, stated that homeowners
felt sufficient details were not addressed and were still
unresolved regarding the tree loss, the position on aggressive
grading, and soil issues. They hired Professor Roger Martin to
independently study the area. With the present Plan 1B, which
was the best plat presented thus far, there was only the soil
issue to be dealt with. With respect to the request by
Councilman Bentley that no summations be heard on Plan 1 or
Plan lA - he stated they can only respond to Plan 1. In view
of the fact that Director of Planning Enger had only seen Plan
1B for two days, he urged Council to listen to Professor
Martin's report as it was pertinent to soil erosion and the
potential environmental effect still remaining true on Plan 1B.
MARLYS LUND, 10164 Trotter's Path, introduced Professor Roger
Martin with Martin & Pitz Associates and his credentials as an
expert in his field. She asked Council to view his
presentation as an opportunity to look further into the final
decision regarding this proposal.
PROFESSOR ROGER MARTIN, homeowners' consultant, stated he felt
ill-prepared to comment in view of the new Plan 1B. His study
was based on Plan 1 and summarized four concerns of impact. 1)
The severe erosion potential of the proposed environment
during-and after-initial land development and specific unit
construction. 2) The unrealistic grading limits indicated by
the Developer. 3) The visual impact of hardwood vegetation
loss due to the development and unit construction. 4) The
Developer's estimate of 23% tree loss as being too low. He
felt an environmental assessment worksheet on the development
was now even more important in light of a new plan which has
not been environmentally reviewed properly by the homeowners or
Staff. He did state that Plan 1B does reduce the tree loss and
the amount of grading to the slope.
WALLY HUSTAD, 10470 Whitetail Crossing, stated he was opposed
to the original development by focusing on four related issues.
1) Allowing a hard surface road to penetrate the valley. 2)
Having hard surface road would bring about dirt bikes and three-
wheel vehicles. Public access was desired with a natural
environment but needed careful thought and control. 3) He was
opposed to grading of the rim. 4) Filling in the ravine and
Eden Prairie City Council -13- January 19, 1988
going into the valley with the road was a major issue. He
further stated that he was not opposed to allowing people in
the valley but was concerned with controlling the access.
Bentley stated that on Plan 1B the private road to the creek
was held back an acceptable distance from the creek. Gair added
that the road was 400 ft. from the creek and the house would be
on a rim 40 ft. above the creek.
DORIS BROOKER, 10164 Trotter's Path, described the resident's
exhibit model of the Purgatory Creek area, scaled 10' per 1",
as an accurate portrayal of the development before the Council.
She stated that Council should judge this plan for its merits.
Professor Martin had only three weeks to study this plan and
the Staff has had nine months. She felt residents would feel
better if, besides a home-designing architect, the Developer
had a landscape architect to protect the sensitive features of
this area. She felt Mr. Gair summarized the concerns
accurately as to the tree loss and drainage, and she felt
pollution should be added as a concern. As citizens, she asked
that Council move to approve the MEQB environmental worksheet
analysis, or a continuance. This was important to twenty-five
people from the area that this be done. This is a virgin,
pristine area and there is no point of reference to the
sensitive environmental factors.
She continued that the worksheet would be a checklist of
information and facts that are needed. There was nothing to
fear and only information to gain. They did not expect to be
surprised by the Developers' new plan and believed it needed
more scrutiny. In closing, she stated they are not talking
about disapproval of the project, they are asking specifically
for an environmental assessment worksheet.
JIM MARTIN, attorney for homeowners, stated he was asked to
advise them of their legal rights in regards to their
objections to the proposal. He advised them that their rights
depended on the law which is the zoning compliance, the
planning study and policy of the City. The criticism of the
plat was to the body that approved the proposal. Time, effect
and experience indicated that this plat should not be approved.
He felt the criticism was valid in respect to the transition
zone for Plan 1, Plan lA and Plan 1B. The City has, as one
body of law, the Guide Plan. Another body is the Purgatory
Creek Study which was presented to the Council in 1976 and
identified open space and park, and special efforts which
should be taken to keep it in its natural state. He continued
that this was not an open and shut case. He believed the
opponents of this plan had come forward with some evidence that
there is the potential for significant environmental impact.
The request by the homeowners was supported by the petition for
the EAW, and letters from the Audubon Society and the Army Corp
of Engineers. It would behoove the City Council to let
Professor Martin look at Plan 1B to see if he can add -to it.
Eden Prairie City Council -14- January 19, 1988
He was convinced that the City Council had a duty to let the
process unfold and obtain an environmental assessment worksheet
for Plan 1B.
He continued that Professor Martin has stated there is not just
a potential of impact, there is actually going to be
significant devastation to the lower Purgatory Creek corridor
based on Plan 1; and with Plan 1B there are still lots in the
conservancy area where there has never been lots proposed
before.
MELANIE KREMER, 10131 Phaeton Drive, inquired about the access
to the trail included in the park. Lambert responded that the
private drive would be the only access to the creek floor
without steps, from Riverview Road north to a proposed access
across from Homeward Hills Park. In the years to come, a trail
from County Road 1 to Riverview Road with various access points
would be proposed and all determinations thereof made by
Council via a public hearing.
DONALD BRAUER stated the City Comprehensive Guide Plan and
Purgatory Creek Study were guides for the planning and
processing of preservation of the land. He noted that nothing
new had been proposed in this proposal versus other development
proposals in the area, except for the private road and it
corrects a serious erosion problem and provided future
drainage. It provides the City with an opportunity to provide
access to valley floor for emergency vehicles and for
pedestrians. Other projects in this area have been done
without the benefit of a formalized EAW process. The Staff and
Council have reviewed many environmental assessment worksheets.
There are a lot of questions and Staff knows the answers to
them. All these factors have been considered in its review.
He did not feel there was any benefit to the worksheet at this
point in the reviewing of this proposal,
WALLY HUSTAD responded that the Creek Knoll project in 1977 did
have an EAW and it was presented to Council. With respect to
the penetration of the valley, residents requested at the
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resource Commission meeting that a
task force be set up so that the whole issue of utilization of
the valley be discussed with citizen input rather than just a .
small group of people deciding the use. Once the Council makes
the decision to put a road down in the valley the City would
pre-empt the decisions of the future. The Council should set
up a task force made up of developers, Council, Staff and
residents to decide if the City wants a Moir Park as in
Bloomington, a Minnehaha Park as in Minneapolis, or something
special.
DORIS BROOKER speaking to the approval of the environmental
worksheet, stated that 25 residents who signed the petition and
45 others are asking that the worksheet be done. Professor Martin has stated the slopes addressed in Plan 1B are'on the
Eden Prairie City Council -15- January 19, 1988
south edge and lots on the north edge have not been addressed
due to the brevity of time he has seen the plans. The least
that the road in the ravine does is improve the drainage. The
road into the ravine and the north lots need additional
attention for evaluation. Residents have a concern and the
City has something to think about for parks and trails.
MARJORIE PITZ, Martin & Pitz Associates, stated it has not been
brought forward that the road to the ravine is a very steep
road with a 10% grade and should be looked at for environmental
assessment impact.
Harris inquired to Pitz if in Plan 1B the grade was still at
10%. Developer answered affirmatively and that 10% was not a
steep grade for this area. Public Works Director Dietz
responded that 8% was the City standard for public streets, but
by policy, a private drive can be as much as 12%.
Pidcock inquired if this road would be the only access for the
public to enter the park or was there another area. Anderson
replied that there was not another entrance open for public to
access Purgatory Creek south of County Road 1. Lambert stated
that the just approved Bluffs East 5th Addition would create a
creek crossing with steps down the slope as well as another
area across from Homeward Hills Park would go downward without
stairs so the disabled would have access.
There was no further public comment.
MOTION 2:
Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to close the public
hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION 3:
Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to take off the table the
question of the EAW, and open for discussion. Motion carried
unanimously.
Bentley stated that one of the reasons for the EAW was to go
through the review process which the City does in the process
of reviewing a development proposal. In virtually every case
of an EAW it was repetitive of work done by the City. He has
not seen an EAW presented that contradicted the work done by
the City Staff. The purpose of an EAW was to help determine
the impacts on the environment addressing such things as soil
erosion vegetation, and these have all been addressed. -He was not unsympathetic to the residents but does not see the
necessity of the EAW and supported the motion.
Pidcock was in agreement with Bentley.
Pauly stated the motion should be clarified that the project
presented here this date, Plan 1B dated January 18, 1988, does
not have the potential for significant environmental effects.
Eden Prairie City Council -16- January 19, 1988
Peterson stated he was sensitive to the involvement of the
people and applauded them for their involvement and quality of
presentation. Their questions were answered and he would feel
differently about the EAW if this was the first proposal or if
it were a larger proposal. He believed the environmental
questions had been raised and addressed by Council, Staff and
residents, and he supported the motion.
Anderson commented that this is a sensitive area and was
appalled last June when he saw the original plans. The current
plan is a significant improvement from the last one he saw and
he is satisfied with the project which has resulted from the
process of negotiation, investigation of the harmful effects on
erosion, soils, and trees. The questions of the EAW have been
met to his satisfaction.
Pidcock applauded the people who worked so hard to bring this
project to its present stage.
Pauly stated that as a part of the action in any event, there
should be a Record of Decision and Findings of Fact. Staff
should be directed to prepare a Record of Findings for
presentation to and adoption by Council at a future meeting.
MOTION 4:
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to determine that Plan 1B does
not have the potential for significant environmental impact and
to Direct Staff to prepare a Record of Decision and Findings of
Fact for EAW on Creekview Development Plan 13 Proposal dated
January 18, 1988. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION 5:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley to adopt Resolution No. 88-
15 approving the PUD Concept. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION 6:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley to approve 1st Reading of
Ordinance No. 8-88-PUD-1-88 for PUD District Review and
Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION 7:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley to adopt Resolution No. 88-
16 approving the Preliminary Plat Plan 1B.
Peterson requested discussion of rationale for inclusion of
homes and private drive; and appointment of a task force to
decide on trails, etc. in the near future.
He continued that the private drive was the access point and
it appeared to him that all the residents of the area should
feel comfortable that there are two dwellings at the end of the
road to monitor the traffic going to the creek floor. If there
were no homes there would be no live-in monitors. The road,
without monitors, would be an easy access point for three-wheel
Lk7
Eden Prairie City Council -17- January 19, 1988
vehicles and dirt bikes. Having residents as monitors would mitigate the negative effect of the intrusion to the valley.
His feelings were that the two homes would not be any more of
an intrusion than the present homes in the creek valley.
Bentley stated another consideration in the development was the
knoll that the Developer was dedicating to the City and the
public advantage to having that parcel.
Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION 8:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley to Direct Staff to prepare a
Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff
Recommendations and Council conditions for Plan 1B dated
January 18, 1988.
Bentley clarified that the motion included a recommendation for public easement down the private road as a condition of approval and acceptance by the City of property dedication
offered by the Developer.
Wayne Brown stated at the time of final approval dedication of
land would become effective.
Lambert requested language be stated that Developer has offered
the land as a gift.
Peterson inquired if it has been defined where the trail would
leave the private property and continue on toward the creek
valley. Lambert stated the end of the cul-de-sac was the cut
off.
Motion carried unanimously.
Harris spoke to the audience that this was a good demonstration
of the democratic process. There had been public and private
negotiations, findings of fact, discussion and debate. All
present tonight should feel comfortable with the outcome.
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 39828-40123
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Payment of
Claims Nos. 39828-40123. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley,
Harris, Pidcock and Peterson voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
None
I".;
Eden Prairie City Council -18- January 19, 1988
VII. A. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL SUPPORT FOR
DEVELOPERS FORUM
Char Johnson, representing the Eden Prairie Chamber of
Commerce, announced that the Developers Forum will be holding
its first meeting on January 27th. The purpose of the
Developers Forum is to have good communication between the City
and developers and eliminate a lot of time for City Staff once
they have educated the developers. To make the Developers
Forum a success, they are requesting a written statement or
resolution from the City Council stating that they are in
support of the Forum.
Peterson questioned the phrase "provide an advisory committee
to the City..." as stated in the Chamber letter dated December
15, 1987, and in the January 13, 1988 letter to Chris Enger.
He asked Johnson what is the vision of an advisory committee?
What is the definition of the City - is it the Staff, is it the
Staff, Council and Commission?
Johnson responded that before a meeting the issues to be
discussed will be decided by the Chairman of the Forum and Eden
Prairie City Manager and who would best represent the City on
that particular issue.
The definition of an advisory committee is to bring the
thoughts of the Forum out at the meeting.
Bentley suggested the wording of the advisory committee be
stated as follows: Advisory Committee provides the opportunity
for advising the City during the process of a Forum or
subsequent letter out of the Forum.
Peterson stated that with that understanding he was in
agreement.
Bentley requested City Manager's thoughts on Item 3 of the
letter dated December 15, 1987.
Jullie responded that his thoughts from the beginning were that
this would be a Chamber function, a chance for communication to
occur. He has no problem with Staff attending the meetings;
however, if City sends out the agendas on its letterhead, it
will be perceived as a City project.
Johnson responded that the original intention of the Forum was
to follow the layout of the Plymouth Developers Forum. The
Chamber would feel comfortable with sending out the agendas.
Johnson continued that the meetings are very informal and would
probably only be meeting four times a year. Paul Dunn will
begin as Chairman and will converse with Eden Prairie City
Manager and Director of Planning in preparation of an agenda.
Eden Prairie City Council -19- January 19, 1988
MOTION 1:
Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock that Council give formal
endorsement of the concept of a Developers' Forum and manifest
its support through: 1) having the City Manager and City
Planner coordinate agenda items with the Forum chair; 2) have a
Councilmember assigned as liaison; and a Planning Commissioner
assigned as liaison. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION 2:
Harris moved, seconded by Anderson to nominate George Bentley
as liaison to Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce Developers'
Forum. Motion carried unanimously.
B. STORAGE IN SIDE AND REAR YARD SETBACKS
In December, 1987, residents of the Topview Road area
requested an ordinance regulating the size, type, quantity, and
length of time that recreational and miscellaneous equipment
can be stored on a property. Staff has conducted research
about the extent of such outside storage in the City and the
practices of neighboring communities. Recommendations
for development of an ordinance appeared in the City Manager's
memo dated January 15, 1988.
Zoning Administrator Jean Johnson was present and available to
respond to the research regarding storage of recreational
vehicles in residential districts.
Jullie stated that an ordinance would not solve existing
problems, but it would address future items which are
inevitable.
Anderson felt due to resident petitions, the City must have
discussion and action on this issue
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to direct Staff to draft an
ordinance for approval by Council for Regulation of Rear Yard
Setback Storage. Motion carried unanimously.
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
None
IX. APPOINTMENTS
None
Eden Prairie City Council -20- January 19, 1988
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
LRT Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Meeting
Peterson reported that at the last Intergovernmental Advisory
Committee meeting, the IAC of the County's Light Rail Transit
Project met and discussed the recommendations to the University
corridor and the Hiawatha corridor. Contrary to a newspaper
story, there was no conflict between the Central City and the
suburbs. At the next meeting, tentatively February 5th, he
would not be able to attend, and suggested that Craig Dawson
represent the City as he was very familiar with all of the
material.
B. Report of City Manager
City Manager Review Form
Jullie distributed an alternative review form and requested
that it be evaluated and utilized.
Harris stated Council needs to decide if this were a conceptual
document or a final document. If Council agrees conceptually
to develop something like this, two or three documents should
be reviewed.
MOTION: -
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to accept the concept of the
City Manager Review Form. Motion carried unanimously.
C. Report of City Attorney
None
D. Report of Director of Planning
None
E. Report of Director of Community Services
1. PROPOSAL FOR UPDATING COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN AND
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The Director of Community Services prepared a Request for
Proposal to update the Comprehensive Park Plan and
Development Plan. No cost estimate has been made for this
project; however, it was recommended that it be funded with
Cash Park Fees.
Eden Prairie City Council -21- January 19, 1988
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to recommend approval be
given to the Request for Proposal for Updating the
Comprehensive Park Plan and Development Guide. Motion
carried unanimously.
2. ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM SERVICES AGREEMENT
During the 1988 Budget discussion the Council approved an
Adaptive Recreation and Services Program with the under-
standing that it would be provided through contract with
the cities of Bloomington, Richfield and Edina.
Two agreements were presented to implement the program:
1) An agreement between the cities of Richfield, Eden
Prairie and Edina in which Eden Prairie agrees to pay
Richfield up to $25,000 for a full calendar year of
recreation services; and 2) A Joint Powers Agreement
forming the South Suburban Adaptive Recreation Board among
the four cities.
Staff and City Attorney had reviewed these documents and
recommended approval.
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to recommend approval of
Adaptive Recreation Program Services Agreement dated
January 8, 1988. Motion carried unanimously.
F. Report of Director of Public Works
None
G. Report of Finance Director
1. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST
Peterson stated private kennel license requests had been
withdrawn.
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris that Clerk's License
List be approved with the exception of the Private Kennel
Licenses. Motion carried unanimously.
XI. NEW BUSINESS
None
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to adjourn at 12:08 AM.
Motion carried unanimously.
SPECIAL MEETING
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MARCH 8, 1988
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3:30 PM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and
Patricia Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Asst. to
the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Director of
Planning Chris Enger, Director of
Community Services Robert Lambert,
Director of Public Works Eugene A.
Dietz, Finance Director John Frane,
and Recording Secretary Sue Anderson.
ROLL CALL: All members were present.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to approve the Agenda
and Other Items of Business, as published. Motion carried
unanimously.
II. DISCUSSION ON DOWNTOWN CONCEPT
City Manager Jullie reported on the Staff involvement to
date and the materials provided to Council on the downtown
planning. This included City Attorney Pauly's package on
economic tools to utilize in the development, and the
Planning Departments research providing options, procedures
and goals. Jullie informed Council that a developer for
the area had information pertinent to the downtown concept
and introduced Mark Rooney of Curt Johnson Properties.
Rooney stated he had been in negotiations and discussion
with staff and landowners in the past several months
regarding 50-60 acres in the core of the downtown area.
At the present time his lawyers were working on the
purchasing agreements for approximately 23 acres. The
land would be under control of Johnson Properties through
a land partnership. He spoke of the outline that was
submitted for discussion regarding joint planning and
engineering with the City to coordinate the entire 50-60
acres in a PUD Concept. He suggested that a city hall
could be located in the office building proposed for
Phase I development. Phase I would also include a 10-
screen theater complex and two or three restaurants on
12.6 acres. He requested that the City create a tax
increment project for financing improvements.
Eden Prairie City Council Special Meeting 3-8-88 Page 2
Peterson believed Council was being asked to approve
something architecturally prior to review of the possible
theme of the downtown area.
Rooney stated there was a very tight timeline for what
they hope to accomplish, but felt by working with Staff in
a joint effort, the process would move along smoother.
Peterson inquired about a time frame.
Rooney replied he wanted to start in June, but realistically
it would be August.
Bentley felt the City should dedicate the time and energy
required to deal with the time frame to see this followed
through. He inquired to City Manager what the City might
do relative to taxes to financially aid the development.
Jullie responded that the City had addressed this issue
only in a general manner. They have not discussed
specific time limitations, costs, etc. He felt this must
unfold in the proper sequence of events.
Bentley stated that to put a tax increment project in
process the development needs defining. Jullie responded
that there was a six-month time frame from placing
properties in tax-increment status before a building
permit could be issued.
Rooney stated that by beginning now and paralleling the
projects, they could obtain building permits in line with
the tax-increment district statutes.
Bentley requested that the Council take a public position
showing support of the downtown.
MOTION 1:
Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson that the Eden Prairie
City Council supports the development of a Downtown Eden
Prairie and is willing to work with developers in the
creation of the Downtown Concept. Motion carried
unanimously.
Harris inquired about the completion date for Phase I.
Rooney replied the second quarter of 1989 was the goal.
,
Director of Planning Enger reported that the City has
looked at road alternatives, specifically the inter-
sections. Should they be in the core of downtown or on
the edge; perhaps a traffic circle which would be a
feature of the downtown. He asked Rooney if that was
conceived and requested, would there be a 1-2 acres for
common or downtown management use on the 12.6 acres of
Phase I. Rooney responded that would be worked out in the
negotiating as would any other planning questions.
Eden Prairie City Council Special Meeting 3-8-88 Page 3
Enger asked for clarification that if the master plan led
to the conclusion that there should be a public space in
the core area, would there flexibility for it to occur.
Rooney replied that there was no flexibility in the 12.6
acres, but it would be possible in the process of moving
parcels and could be addressed in later discussions.
MOTION 2:
Motion by Bentley, seconded by Anderson, to direct Staff
to participate in the participation of a Request for
Proposals for the Master Planning Study of the area.
Motion passed unanimously.
MOTION 3:
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris, to direct Staff to bring
other property owners in the area into the master planning
process. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION 4:
Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to direct Staff to
discuss potential City Hall alternatives in the downtown
area in the framework of the Citizens Advisory Committee.
Motion carried unanimously.
Peterson felt the opportunity should be created for
interested citizens to comment, make suggestions and
review the plan. Pidcock added perhaps a competition
could be held to see what the people wanted. Peterson
stated the citizens could be and should be involved
- without delaying the project.
MOTION 5:
Bentley moved, seconded by Harris, to direct Staff to
explore requirements and possibilities for the City's
involvement on a financial level for the downtown, but not
necessarily tied exclusively with the current development
concept.
Dick Feerick, R.M. Feerick & Associates, commented that he
was proud and appreciated the work involved by all, the
Staff, the Council and the Developer, for finally moving
on the development of the downtown area for Eden Prairie.
III. DISCUSSION ON NSP TRANSMISSION LINE
Closed Executive Session
IV. OTHER BUSINESS
V. ADJOURNMENT
I
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
March 15, 1988
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.)
PLUMBING
Artistic Application & Decorating
Assoc. for Retarded Citizens
Donahue Construction
Greystone Construction Co.
C. F. Haglin & Sons Co.
Metro Building Systems, Inc.
William Poppenberger & Son, Inc.
Rutledge Construction Co.
Sheehy Construction
Steiner Development
Sunway Homes, Inc.
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY)
Barnett Builders
The Danberry Company
Durabilt Associates, Inc.
Mark Eklo Homes
Findell Cement, Inc.
Goodwin Builders, Inc.
Harvey Homes, Inc.
Paul Heins Construction
Jarip Builders
Kee Construction, Inc.
Klink Construction
M & L Construction
Metro Chimney & Masonry
Metro Masonary, Inc.
John Muehlberg & Associates
Olson Brick
Rannow Contracting, Inc.
Richter Construction
Rodan Custom Services, Inc.
The Rottlund Company, Inc.
Sawhorse, Inc.
T. P. Shillock Construction
Sunshine Construction '
Tricon Builders, Inc.
Tyrol Builders, Inc.
W. A. Ungerman Const-uction
Gerry Wenkus, Ltd.
Bowler Co., Inc.
Carlson Plumbing
Heating Consultants
Hopkins Plumbing & Heating
Marsh Plumbing & Heating
P J Plumbing
Roto-Rooter Services Co.
Don Weld Plumbing
GAS FITTER
Diversified Mechanical Services
Hopkins Plumbing & Heating Co.
Marsh Plumbing & Heating
Seasonal Control Company
Thermex Corporation
Valley Aire, Inc.
HEATING & VENTILATING
Bowler Co., Inc.
H. Conrad MFG. Co.
Diversified Mechanical Services
Heating Consultants
Hopkins Plumbing & Heating Co.
P J Plumbing & Heating
Seasonal Control Company
Thermex Corporation
Valley Aire, Inc.
SCAVENGER
Roto-Rooter Services Co.
WELL DRILLING
Braunwarth Well Co.
UTILITY INSTALLER
Roto-Rooter Services Company
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
page two
TYPE C FOOD
Mark's Eden Prairie Amaco
CIGARETTE
Mark's Eden Prairie Amaco
COMMERCIAL KENNEL
Kingdale Kennels
TYPE B FOOD
Penguin Ice Cream
REFUSE HAULER
Waste Technology
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsilbe for
the licensed activity.
14(P
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
City Manager Carl J. Jullie
Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson
Change Order No. 1, Fire Station Construction Contract
March 8, 1988
Work is progressing well under the circumstances for the remodeling and
construction of Fire Stations No. 3 and 4. The contract executed by the
City and Watson-Forsberg, Inc. called for the work to be performed for
$1,343,450. Further, the new station (No. 4) was to be completed by July
1, 1988, and Station No. 3 was to be finished by November 1, 1988.
Change Order No. 1 requests changes totalling $2,147 in additions, $45 in
deductions, and a time extension for Station No. 4. Additions include a
new door at the southeast corner of Station No. 3 which is needed for
access during reconstruction. It would also become a permanent egress from
the building. The other addition is to have a vinyl wall base for three
rooms. Deductions occur from changes in plumbing fixtures. Net cost for these changes is $2,102. —
The time extension request results from an occurrence which the City
Attorney has advised is beyond the contractor's control. C.W.O. Inc.,
Watson-Forsberg's steel supplier, had a bank foreclosure. Identifying a
new steel supplier placed work six weeks behind schedule. The contractor
has requested a 42-day extension, thus resulting in a completion date of
August 12, 1988. (The contractor expects that work on Station No. 3 will
also be done at about that time.)
Recommendation: It is recommended that Council approve Change Order No. 1
which increases the contract amount by $2,102 and extends the completion
date for Fire Station No. 4 to August 12, 1988.
CWD:CJJ:jdp
E
Watson-Forsberg Company
252 South Plaza Building
Minneapolis, MN 55416
ARCHITECT 1848.003.03-1'S PROJECT NO
CONTRACT FOR General Construction
CONTRACT DATE:
November 5, 1987
CHANGE
ORDER
Aln DOC:0A.1FM' (701
Dr,trIbution to
0\VNER
ARCHITECT
CONTRACTOR . CI
FIELD
OTHER
PROJECT. New and Remodeled Fire 4+
(name, address) Stations, Eden Prairie,
Minnesota
TO (ConlracturI:
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1
INITIATION DATE:
March 1, 1988
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
Provide the following work required by Proposal Request No. 2:
1. Provide door and frame per Drawing 11R0002. Door 150 to be
existing 3'-0" x 7'-0" door with hardware originally located
near Door 15C. Prepare and paint door frame with enamel paint
of color to be selected by Architect.
2. Refer to Drawing 6 Dated September 30, 1987.
On Plan No. 1, provide vinyl base for Rooms 6, 7, and 9.
ADD $ 2,147.00
(Continued on Page 2)
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposal Request No. 2.
Watson-Forsberg letter dated February 15, 1988.
TEK Mechanical Service Inc. letter dated January 25, 1988.
Watson-Forsberg letter dated February 12, 1988 with enclosure.
Not valid until signed by both the 0,ner and Ar< Wert
Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreem,nt hereisith r including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Tune.
The onginal (Contract Sum) H5marmmee.d.Otmitmltr{i011) was $1,353,450.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders
0.00 The (Contract Sum) (6namnteed-ktreininfrrectso prior to this Change Ord
e
r
w
a
s
$1,353,450.00 The (Contract Sum) KCfrvarteed-NiarimmtirEt!i) will be 6ncmasech (decrea
s
e
d
)
M
r
c
n
u
T
T
E
M
d
i
by the Change Order
$ 2,102.00 The new (Contract Sum) ihiemnk as,mcSl including this Change Order wdl be $1,355,552.00 The Contract Tune will be uncreased)44,4ea,e4) kowk&ni)t)ed) by
Forty_two days for Station No. 4 Only. The Date of Substantial Completion as of ihe dale of this Change Order ihe
r
e
f
o
r
e
:
i
s
Authorized:
City of Eden Prairie
leg . Snuth Rlaza_Building tIlisd R Executive Drive Address Acldre,s Address Minneapolis, MN 55403 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677
By
BY
BY
DATE
DATE DATE
Setter. Leach & Lindstrom lac. Watson-Forsberg Cgmpany
MA DOCUMENT 6701 • CHANCE ORDER • APRIL 7978 EDITION • AIM, • At 1978 tilt AMIRI( AN INSTITUTE Or A8(1111ICTS, 1735 NEW N'ORK Svt , N m41151;105, DC 20005
G701 —1978
Change Order No. 1
Comm. No. 1848.003.03-1
Page 2
3. a. Refer to Specification Section 15220, Domestic Hot Water
System 1.1 Gas Fired Water Heater.
- Add A.O. Smith as approved manufacturer.
b. Refer to Specification Section 15300, Plumbing Fixtures and
Trim 1.6 Plumbing Fixtures Specifications.
Item F-8 Mopsink.
- Add E.L. Mustee as approved manufacturer.
c. Item F-9 Electric Water Cooler.
- Add Elkay as approved manufacturer.
DEDUCT ($ 45.00)
TOTAL ADD $ 2,102.00
4. Refer to article 3 of the Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor.
The contract time for completion of Fire Station No. 4 is extended 42 calendar days
to August 12, 1988 due to bank foreclosure of C.W.O. Inc.
(No change in cost)
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
March 9, 1988
Addendum to Joint Powers Agreement South
Suburban Adaptive Recreation Board
Enclosed is a copy of an amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement Between the
City of Bloomington, Edina, Eden Prairie, and Richfield establishing the South
Suburban Recreation Board. This addendum was suggested by the City of
Richfield, and simply clarifies that the Adaptive Recreation Program shall not
be implemented until approved on an annual basis by the City Council of each
party, and that the Board may not make any substantial changes in policy
affecting the development, coordination or conduct of the adaptive recreation
programs without first obtaining approval of the City Managers of each of the
communities involved.
City staff recommends approval of this addendum as written.
BL:mdd
Respectfully yours,
ohn B. Dean
Mr. Thomas S. Erickson Mr. Roger Pauly, Esq. c/o Dorsey & Whitney
4108 IDS Center 2200 First Bank Place East Minneapolis, MN 55402 Minneapolis, MN 55402
Mr. David Ornstein
City Attorney
City of Bloomington
2215 West Old Shakopee Road
Bloomington, MN 55431
Re: Addendum to Joint Powers Agreement - South Sub
u
r
b
a
n
Adaptive Recreation Board
Gentlemen:
Last week each of us was provided with a
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
addendum to the Joint Powers Agreement.
A copy of the addendum, modified into execution
f
o
r
m
a
t
,
is enclosed. It is my intention to present the
a
d
d
e
n
d
u
m
to the Richfield Council at its March 7, 1988,
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
.
However, those plans are somewhat contingent upo
n
w
h
e
t
h
e
r
you and your clients find the form and conten
t
o
f
t
h
e
addendum to be acceptable, and whether they als
o
i
n
t
e
n
d
to obtain approval in the near future.
LeFeYere
Lefler
Kennedy
O'Brien &
Drawz
February 24, 1988
2000 First Bank Place West
Minneapolis
Minnesota 55402
Telephone 612)333-0543
Telecopier 1612) 333-0540
Clayton L. LeFevere
Herbert P. Lefler
.1. Dennis O'Brien
John E. Orawz
David J. Kennedy
Joseph E, Hamilton
John B. Dean
Glenn E. Purdue
Richard J. Schietter
Charles L. LeFevere
Herbert P. Lefler Ill
James J. Thomson. Jr.
Thomas R. Galt
Doyle Nolan
John G. Kressel
Steven B. Schmidt
James M. Strommen
Ronald H. Batty
'ham P. Jordan
am R. Skallerud
•.odney D. Anderson
Corrine A. Heine
David D. Beaudoin
Steven M. Talien
Mary Frances Skala
Christopher J. Hammel
Timothy J. Pawlenty
Rolf A. Sponheim
Julie A. Bergh
Darcy L. Hitesman
David C. Roland
Karen A. Chi:vilerlik
Paul 0. Baertschs
Accordingly, please let me know, prior to March
2
,
1
9
8
8
,
whether it is appropriate for me to take this add
e
n
d
u
m
t
o
the Richfield Council for consideration.
JBD:rsr
Enclosure
cc: Lillian Hipp
ADDENDUM TO JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
AMONG CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON, EDINA, EDEN PRAIRIE
AND RICHFIELD ESTABLISHING SOUTH SUBURBAN
ADAPTIVE RECREATION BOARD
WHEREAS, on , 1988, the City of Bloomington, City of Edina,
City of Eden Prairie and City of Richfield
e
n
t
e
r
e
d
i
n
t
o
a Joint and
Cooperative Agreement establishing the South Su
b
u
r
b
a
n
A
d
a
p
t
i
v
e
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
Board for the purpose of providing adaptive recre
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
a
n
d
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
to disabled persons; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend Artic
l
e
4
,
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
2
o
f
said
Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:
1. Article 4, Section 2 of the Joint and Cooperative
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
b
e
a
m
e
n
d
e
d
b
y
adding the following language:
"The Adaptive Recreation Programs shall not
be implemented until approved on an annual basis by the City Councils of each P
a
r
t
y
.
T
h
e
B
o
a
r
d
m
a
y
n
o
t
make any substantial change in policy affe
c
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
coordination or conduct of Adaptive Recreation P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
f
i
r
s
t
obtaining the approval of the City Managers of e
a
c
h
P
a
r
t
y
.
"
2. This Addendum is effective on the date on which a
f
u
l
l
y
e
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
c
o
p
y
o
f
this Addendum, together with a certified co
p
y
o
f
a
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
resolution of each of the Parties authorizing
i
t
s
e
x
e
c
u
t
i
o
n
,
i
s
f
i
l
e
d
with the City Clerk of the City of Richfiel
d
.
T
h
i
s
A
d
d
e
n
d
u
m
m
a
y
b
e
executed in any number of counterparts, each of
w
h
i
c
h
m
a
y
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
an original copy.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Parties hav
e
c
a
u
s
e
d
t
h
i
s
A
d
d
e
n
d
u
m
t
o
be signed by their duly authorized officers as
o
f
t
h
e
d
a
t
e
d
u
l
y
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
opposite their signatures.
(43 0
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
Date:
By
Its
By
Its City Manager
CITY OF EDINA
Dace:
By
Its
By
Its City Manager
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Date: By
Its
By
Its City Manager
CITY OF RICHFIELD
Date:
By
Its
rm.
By
Its City Manager
R7:005.5AD01.E14
1.1
Bergman Addition
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as o
f
, 1988, by
Richard Bergman, an individual, and Richard
Z
i
m
i
n
s
k
e
a
n
d
M
a
r
j
o
r
i
e
Z
i
m
i
n
s
k
e
,
h
u
s
b
a
n
d
and wife, hereinafter jointly referred to
a
s
"
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
,
"
a
n
d
t
h
e
C
I
T
Y
O
F
E
D
E
N
PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafte
r
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
t
o
a
s
"
C
i
t
y
:
"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for
p
l
a
t
t
i
n
g
o
f
2
.
1
6
a
c
r
e
s
i
n
t
o
t
h
r
e
e
single family lots, situated in Hennepin
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
S
t
a
t
e
o
f
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
,
m
o
r
e
f
u
l
l
y
described in Exhibit A, attached hereto a
n
d
m
a
d
e
a
p
a
r
t
h
e
r
e
o
f
,
a
n
d
s
a
i
d
a
c
r
e
a
g
e
hereinafter referred to as "the property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
C
i
t
y
a
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
s
a
i
d
p
l
a
t
t
i
n
g
,
Developer covenants and agrees to constructi
o
n
u
p
o
n
,
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
a
n
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
o
f
said property as follows:
1. Developer shall develop the property i
n
c
o
n
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
materials revised and dated November 9, 1987, reviewed and approved by the City Council on January 5, 1988,
a
n
d
a
t
t
a
c
h
e
d
h
e
r
e
t
o
a
s
Exhibit B, subject to such changes arid mo
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
herein. Developer shall not develop, const
r
u
c
t
u
p
o
n
,
o
r
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
the property in any other respect or manner t
h
a
n
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
h
e
r
e
i
n
.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the perf
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
o
b
s
e
r
v
a
n
c
e
b
y
Developer at such times and in such manne
r
a
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
t
h
e
r
e
i
n
o
f
all of the terms, covenants, agreements, an
d
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
s
e
t
f
o
r
t
h
i
n
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part h
e
r
e
o
f
.
3. Prior to release by the City of the fina
l
p
l
a
t
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
,
Developer agrees to submit a request for
v
a
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
the existing utility easement located alo
n
g
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
e
r
n
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
line of Lot 27, Forest Knolls Addition, as
d
e
p
i
c
t
e
d
i
n
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
B
,
attached hereto.
4. Prior to any issuance of any permit for gra
d
i
n
g
o
r
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
o
n
t
h
e
property, Developer agrees to submit to the
C
h
i
e
f
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
O
f
f
i
c
i
a
l
and obtain the Chief Building Official's
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
p
l
a
n
s
f
o
r
demolition and/or removal of existing Well
s
a
n
d
s
e
p
t
i
c
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
o
n
the property.
Prior to demolition or removal, Developer shall provide to the Ci
t
y
a certified check in the amount of $1,000.00 to guarantee
t
h
e
restoration of the property to grade.
City agrees to return said certified check to Developer after t
h
e
demolition or removal on the property is completed and after it
i
s
verified by City that the septic systems and wells have been properly removed or demolished, and that the property has be
e
n
restored to grade.
5. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the propert
y
,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the Ci
t
y
Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water
,
storm sewer, and erosion control for the property.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, o
r
cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in sa
i
d
plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibi
t
C, attached hereto.
6. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property
,
Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and obtain th
e
Director's approval of a revised grading plan depicting a maximu
m
twelve percent (12%) slope on the new driveway with access t
o
Rosemary Road for the most southerly lot along Rosemary Road,
a
s
depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
7. Developer acknowledges that, at prior to issuance by the City of an
y
building permit for the property, Developer shall pay the connectio
n
fee for sanitary sewer and water for the most southerly lot a
l
o
n
g
Rosemary Road, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached here
t
o
.
($7,400.00 in 1988)
8. Developer shall notify the City and the Watershed District 48 ho
u
r
s
prior to any grading, tree removal, or tree cutting on the proper
t
y
.
Amolube Express Oil Change
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 10-88
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING ORDINANCE #3-86
A
N
D
,
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG O
T
H
E
R
THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
m
a
d
e
a part hereof.
Section 2. That Ordinance #3-86 be amended by adding the following to
Section 5. of said Ordinance:
"The land shall also be subject to the terms and conditions of that
certain Supplement to Developer's Agreement dated March 15, 1988,
entitled Amolube Express Oil Change, entered into between Amoco Oil
Company, a Maryland corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, which
Supplement is hereby made a part hereof."
Section 3. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation"
a
n
d
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in th
e
i
r
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on February 2, 1988, and finally read and adopted and ordered published
a
t
a
regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 15th day of March, 1988
.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. -Preterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Rairie News on the day of
N
Exhibit A
Legal Description
Lot 1, Block 1, Anderson Lakes Commercial Center 2nd Addition.
Amoco Oil Company
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 3-86
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
,
R
E
M
O
V
I
N
G
C
E
R
T
A
I
N
L
A
N
D
F
R
O
M
O
N
E
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING
T
H
E
L
E
G
A
L
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
O
F
L
A
N
D
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY C
O
D
E
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
1
A
N
D
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
1
.
9
9
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISION
S
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNES
O
T
A
,
O
R
D
A
I
N
S
:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exh
i
b
i
t
A
a
t
t
a
c
h
e
d
h
e
r
e
t
o
a
n
d
m
a
d
e
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the
l
a
n
d
b
e
removed from the Rural District and be placed i
n
t
h
e
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
District.
Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land sh
a
l
l
b
e
,
and hereby is removed from the Rural District and sha
l
l
b
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
h
e
r
e
a
f
t
e
r
i
n
t
h
e
Neighborhood Commercial District, and the legal
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
l
a
n
d
i
n
e
a
c
h
District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, S
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
1
,
S
u
b
p
a
r
a
g
r
a
p
h
B
,
shall be, and are amended accordingly.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisi
o
n
s
a
n
d
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Includ
i
n
g
P
e
n
a
l
t
y
f
o
r
V
i
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
"
a
n
d
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor
"
a
r
e
h
e
r
e
b
y
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
i
r
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim
h
e
r
e
i
n
.
Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and condit
i
o
n
s
o
f
that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of Mar
c
h
4
,
1
9
8
6
,
e
n
t
e
r
e
d
i
n
t
o
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland corporation, and the
C
i
t
y
o
f
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
,
a
n
d
t
h
a
t
certain Owners' Supplement to Developer's Agreem
e
n
t
d
a
t
e
d
a
s
o
f
M
a
r
c
h
4
,
1
9
8
6
,
entered into between 169/Anderson Lakes Corporatio
n
,
a
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
,
a
n
d
the City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement and Owne
r
s
'
S
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
h
e
r
e
b
y
m
a
d
e
a
part hereof.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and
a
f
t
e
r
i
t
s
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Counc
i
l
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
E
d
e
n
Prairie on the 7th day of January, 1986, and final
l
y
r
e
a
d
a
n
d
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
a
n
d
o
r
d
e
r
e
d
published at a regular meeting of the City Council
o
f
s
a
i
d
C
i
t
y
o
n
t
h
e
4
t
h
d
a
y
o
f
March, 1986.
••
ATTEST:
0
ane, ity ry eterson, Mayor
4VISHED in—the Eden Prairie News on the 19th day of March, lna'
Amolube Express Oil Change
SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
This Supplement to Developer's Agreement made and entered int
o
a
s
o
f
t
h
i
s
day of , 1988, by and between Amoco Oil Co
m
p
a
n
y
,
a
Maryland corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer,"
a
n
d
t
h
e
C
I
T
Y
O
F
E
D
E
N
PRAIRIE, hereinafter referred to as "City;"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, City previously approved agreements for development of
t
h
e
l
a
n
d
,
a
portion of said land being that as described in Exhibit A, att
a
c
h
e
d
h
e
r
e
t
o
a
n
d
m
a
d
e
a part hereof, and hereinafter referred to as "the property
,
"
a
n
d
s
a
i
d
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
agreements being as described below:
A November 4, 1980 agreement entitled Anderson Lakes Parkway N
e
i
g
h
b
c
r
h
o
o
d
Shopping Center PUD, for 17 acres of land, approving a Pl
a
n
n
e
d
U
n
i
t
Development Concept for the property, said agreement made and e
n
t
e
r
e
d
i
n
t
o
between Eden Prairie Real Estate Investment Corporation, a
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
corporation, and City;
A June 5, 1984, PUD Developer's Agreement entitled National Chil
d
C
a
r
e
,
f
o
r
said 17 acres of land, amending the Planned Unit Developme
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
approved by the November 4, 1980, agreement, said agreement made
a
n
d
e
n
t
e
r
e
d
into between Eden Prairie Real Estate Investment Corporation, a
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
corporation, and City; and,
A March 4, 1986, Developer's Agreement entitled Amoco Oil
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
,
f
o
r
approximately 1.4 acres of said 17 acres, approving a
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
U
n
i
t
Development Amendment to the National Child Care Planned Uni
t
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
approved by the June 5, 1984, agreement, for construction
o
f
a
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
station, said agreement made and entered into between Amoco Oi
l
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
,
a
Maryland corporation, and City;
WHEREAS, the provisions of said agreements are binding upon and
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
a
b
l
e
against owners, their successors, and their assigns of the
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
i
n
Exhibit A, attached hereto; and,
WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend
s
a
i
d
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between
t
h
e
p
a
r
t
i
e
s
h
e
r
e
t
o
a
s
f
o
l
l
o
w
s
:
1. Developer shall develop the property i
n
c
o
n
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
material revised and dated December 10, 1
9
8
7
,
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
a
n
d
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
by the City Council on February 2, 1988
,
a
n
d
a
t
t
a
c
h
e
d
h
e
r
e
t
o
a
s
Exhibit B, and made a part hereof, sub
j
e
c
t
t
o
s
u
c
h
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
a
n
d
modifications as provided herein. Deve
l
o
p
e
r
s
h
a
l
l
n
o
t
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
,
construct upon, or maintain the propert
y
i
n
a
n
y
o
t
h
e
r
r
e
s
p
e
c
t
o
r
manner than provided herein.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the perf
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
o
b
s
e
r
v
a
n
c
e
b
y
Developer at such times and in such manne
r
a
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
t
h
e
r
e
i
n
o
f
all of the terms, covenants, agreements,
a
n
d
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
,
s
e
t
f
o
r
t
h
in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a pa
r
t
h
e
r
e
o
f
.
3. Developer shall develop the property in acc
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
a
t
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
developer's agreement dated November 4, 1
9
8
0
a
n
d
t
h
a
t
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
P
U
D
developer's agreement dated June 5, 1984,
b
o
t
h
e
n
t
e
r
e
d
i
n
t
o
b
y
a
n
d
between Eden Prairie Real Estate Investm
e
n
t
C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
t
h
e
City, and in accordance with that certai
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
'
s
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
dated March 4, 1986, entered into between
A
m
o
c
o
O
i
l
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
a
n
d
t
h
e
City, except to the extent that said ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
r
e
i
n
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
with this Agreement. Said agreements ar
e
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
h
e
r
e
i
n
b
y
reference.
4. Developer agrees to notify the City and W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
a
t
l
e
a
s
t
48 hours in advance any grading or tree re
m
o
v
a
l
o
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
f
t
y
.
5. Prior to issuance of any building permit o
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
,
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
agrees to submit to the City Engineer,
a
n
d
t
o
o
b
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Engineer's approval of detailed plans f
o
r
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
r
u
n
-
o
f
f
,
erosion control, and utilities on the prope
r
t
y
.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Develo
p
e
r
a
g
r
e
e
s
t
o
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
,
or cause to be constructed, those impr
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
l
i
s
t
e
d
a
b
o
v
e
a
s
approved by the City Engineer, in accord
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
t
e
r
m
s
a
n
d
conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
6. Prior to issuance of any building permit
o
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
,
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
agrees to submit to the Director of Pla
n
n
i
n
g
,
a
n
d
t
o
o
b
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
Director's approval of:
A. A revised landscape plan which reflects
t
h
e
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
all displaced trees on the property.
B. A revised plan of the building elevations
w
h
i
c
h
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
s
t
h
e
City Code requirement for 75% of said
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
b
e
facebrick, or better, materials. Said ma
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
consistent with the Design Framework Manual for the
property.
N
C. A revised screening plan based upon the final design of
U
.
S. 169, depicting adequate screening of the parking
a
r
e
a
s
and overhead garage doors on the property from view a
t
t
h
e
public street elevation.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Develop
e
r
a
g
r
e
e
s
t
o
construct said improvements, as approved by the
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
o
f
Planning, in accordance with the terms and conditions
o
f
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
C
,
attached hereto.
7. Developer acknowledges that there shall be no direct ac
c
e
s
s
t
o
T
r
u
n
k
Highway #169 from this property allowed.
Amolube Express Oil Change
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-38
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE 10-88 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 10-88 was adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 15th day of Ma
r
c
h
,
1988;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 10-88, which is
attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said
text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said
ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 10-88 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein,
within 20 days after said publication
ADOPTED by the City Council on March 15, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jan D. Frane, City Clerk
LW)
CHANCE ORDER #1
I.C. 52-096
Bluffs East 4th Addition - Road & Utility Extensions
TO: City of Eden Prairie
Changes made for work performed in this contract:
NATURE OF CHANCES:
I. Add wood fiber blanket required by Watershed District in the ravine
after letting of contract.
2. Additional dirt work required in this contract for grade changes on
Normaney Crest due to platting of Prairie Bluffs Subdivision during
construction.
3. Add 10 x 4 sanitary service wyes for Prairie Bluffs Subdivision.
ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT COSTS:
I. Add the following quantities and costs to the contract:
Wood Fiber Blanket -
Material & Installation 8,240 S.Y. 0 $1.55 = S 12,772.00
2. Add the following quantities and costs to the contract:
Cubic Yards -
Additional Dirt Work 5,600 C.Y. 9 $1.35 = $ 7,560.00
3. Add the following quantities and costs to the contract:
Material & Installation -
10 x 4 DIP Sanitary Service Wyes 3 9 $225 = 675.00
TOTAL
$ 21,007.00
THE ABOVE CHANCES ARE APPROVED
Engineer City of Eden Prairie
By
By
Date ,9/9/9ct3
Date
THE ABOVE CHANCES ARE ACCEPTED
Contractor
/ ,
By (
Date P/
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
litNNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-37
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
PRAIRIE KNOLL 3RD ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of PRAIRIE KNOLL 3RD ADDITION has been submitted in a manner
required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under
Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had
thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for PRAIRIE KNOLL 3RD ADDITION is approved upon
compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report
on this plat dated MARCH 7, 1988.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving
the six-month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the
preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said
engineer's report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of
this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named
plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the
certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance
with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on MARCH 15, 1988.
Gary 0. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician
DATE: March 7, 1988
SUBJECT: PRAIRIE KNOLL 3RD ADDITION
7,4
PROPOSAL: Hestia Homes, Inc. has requested City Council approval of t
h
e
final plat of Prairie Knoll 3rd Addition located north of Val
l
e
y
V
i
e
w
Road, west of Ontario Boulevard in the North 1/2 of Section
9
.
T
h
e
proposed plat contains 16 single family residential lots and is a
r
e
p
l
a
t
of Outlots A and B, Prairie Knoll 2nd Addition.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on Augus
t
7
,
1984 per Resolution 84-167.
Zoning to R1-9.5 was finally read and approved by the City C
o
u
n
c
i
l
o
n
September 4, 1984 per Ordinance 48-84.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was e
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
o
n
September 4, 1984.
VARIANCES: A variance from the requirements of City Code 12.20, Subd. 2.A,
waiving the six-month maximum time elapse between the approva
l
d
a
t
e
o
f
the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be neces
s
a
r
y
.
All variance requests not authorized through the Developer's
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
must be processed through the Board of Appeals.
Prior to release of the final plat, the Developer shall provi
d
e
l
e
g
a
l
documents to the City which address mutual easements require
d
b
y
t
h
e
zero lot line concept, placement of fences, hedges, maintenance
a
n
d
u
s
e
.
regulations for jointly owned garages, architectural controls
r
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
to building additions and color treatments and restrictions for
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
storage of equipment and recreational vehicles.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal utilities and streets will be installed
throughout the development in conformance with City Standards
a
n
d
t
h
e
requirements of the Developer's Agreement.
The Developer previously entered into an assessment agreement t
o
c
o
v
e
r
the costs of construction of Valley View Road. This agreem
e
n
t
w
a
s
written to describe Prairie Knoll and through consecutive
r
e
p
l
a
t
t
i
n
g
covers Prairie Knoll 3rd Addition.
PAGE 2 OF 2
PRAIRIE KNOLL 3RD ADDITION MARCH 7, 1988
A drainage and utility easement may be necessary over part of Lots
1
through 4, Block 1 covering a ponding area. The Developer and hi
s
Engineers must define the pond limits and provide satisfactory easement
s
on the plat prior to release.
The drainage and utility easement over the rear portions of Lots 8,
9
,
10, 12, 13 and 14 must be shown on the plat consistant with prese
n
t
slope easement needs for Valley View Road and scenic requirements a
s
defined by the Planning Department. The Developer and his Engineer mu
s
t
coordinate these needs and enter on the plat prior to release.
An existing sanitary sewer line crosses Lots 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12. Thi
s
line will be abandoned upon completion of the new utilities within th
i
s
plat. Vacation of the underlying easement may be necessary, and must
b
e
coordinated by the Developer prior to release of the plat.
PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the
Developer's Agreement.
An executed document covering the scenic easement requirement of th
e
Developer's Agreement must be submitted to the Engineering Departmen
t
prior to release of the plat.
BONDING: Bonding shall conform to City Code requirements.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Prairie Knoll 3rd
Addition subject at the requirements of this report and the following:
1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $408.00.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $1,456.00.
3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $640.00.
4. Receipt of documents covering zero lot line concept requirements.
5. Revision or correction on plat of dratnage and utility easements
defined in this report.
6. Receipt of recordable scenic or conservation easement documents.
7. Receipt of application for the vacation of drainage and utility
easement if necessary.
8. Satisfaction of bonding requirements.
-MEMORANDUM-
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
March 11, 1988
SUBJECT: Agreement between Raymond N. Welter, Jr. and the City of Eden Prairie
Regarding Improvements to Blossom Road
Resolution 87-93 approved April 21, 1987, authorized utility and street
improvements on Blossom Road from Bennett Place easterly to County Road No. 1.
Blossom Road was an existing gravel street within a 33 foot right-of-way.
The existing intersection of Blossom Road and County Road No. 1 was hazardous
for two reasons. The location of the intersection afforded very poor site
distance westerly on County Road No. 1 and the angle of intersection was skewed
considerably from the preferred 90 degree angle.
Two design alternatives for the easterly end of Blossom Road were considered.
The first was the relocation of the intersection westerly along County Road No.
1 to a point opposite Spoon Ridge. This alternative would require significant
right-of-way acquisition from an existing residential parcel owned by Raymond
N. Welter, Jr. The second alternative was to terminate the east end of Blossom
Road in a cul-de-sac and eliminate its connection to County Road No. 1. This
alternative also required right-of-way acquisition from the Welter property but
had considerably less impact on the existing home on Lot 23 of Eden Prairie
Acres.
After preliminary discussions with Mr. Welter regarding right-of-way acquistion
for the widening of Blossom Road, utility installations and the construction of
a cul-de-sac, the City began a condemnation action for the right-of-way
required from Mr. Welter's property. Mr. Welter and the two property owners on
the south side of Blossom Road across from Mr. Welter suggested that the City
consider delaying improvements to Blossom Road adjacent to their property. It
was the opinion of these property owners that the improvement of the easterly
200 feet of Blossom Road should be delayed until a subdivision plan for the
large lots on the south side of Blossom Road is developed.
Based on this proposal sanitary sewer and water main would be extendeb the full
length of Blossom Road providing utilities to all existing homes. The _
-"installation of concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing would extend
1416
Page 2 of 2 March 11, 1980
from Bennett Place easterly to the east line of the Lutheran Church under
construction on the north side of Blossom Road. The easterly 200 feet of
Blossom Road would be restored after utility construction with a gravel
surface. Access to County Road No. 1 at the east end of Blossom Road would be
terminated and a temporary gravel turn-around constructed.
With the termination of access to County Road No. 1 this short stretch of
gravel surfaced road will be utilized by just three existing single family
homes. In order to insure that a cul-de-sac could be constructed in the
future, at the east end of Blossom Road, it is desirable to have an agreement
with Mr. Welter that would prohibit the construction of any additional homes on
the property he owns along the north side of Blossom Road until such time that
a permanent configuration for the east end of Blossom Road is developed.
The attached agreement has been prepared by the City Attorney's office to
document the conditions under which the City terminates its condemnation action
against Mr. Welter. This program should provide for an acceptable level of
utility surface for the three most easterly homes on Blossom Road, preserve all
current alternatives for the construction of the easterly end of Blossom Road
and allow for potential alternative configuration for Blossom Road in
conjunction with development of the property to the south.
ADG:ss
AGREEMENT
This is an Agreement between Raymond N. Welter, Jr. and
Carole Ann Welter ("owners") and the City of Eden Prairie
"(City").
The City has initiated a condemnation action entitled City
of Eden Prairie v. Raymond N. Welter, Jr., Carole Ann Welter and
County of Hennepin seeking to obtain permanent and temporary
easements over portions of Lots 22 and 23, Eden Prairie Acres,
Hennepin County, Minnesota. The easements were sought for the
purpose of right-of-way, utility and drainage projects and
temporary construction easements along Blossom Road (hereinafter
referred to as the "Improvements"). The City and Owners have
agreed to change the character of the Improvements along that
portion of Blossom Road abutting the property described above
primarily to eliminate paving of the road and construction of a
cul-de-sac.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the
parties as follows:
1. The City will install water and sewer along Blossom
Road in the current right-of-way. The City will assess to Owners-
a proportionate share of the cost of this project, -including
reconstruction of the road, based upon front footage.
2. Blossom Road will be reconstructed as a gravel road in
front of Lots 20, 21, 22 and 23, Eden Prairie Acres.
14u :6
Page -2-
3. The Owners acknowledge that the City will terminate
access from Blossom Road onto County Road #1 in connection with
the construction with the Improvements.
4. The City and Owners acknowledge that the Improvements
referred to herein are part of a larger construction project on
Blossom Road. The construction of Blossom Road as a paved right-
of-way will terminate at or prior to the westerly line of Lot 23,
Eden Prairie Acres. The City will not construct a cul-de-sac at
the terminus of the paved portion of the roadway.
5. The Owners will hereby grant the City contemporaneous
with the execution of this Agreement the easements described on
Exhibit "A" hereto for the construction and maintenance of the
Improvements.
6. No further development of additional housing units will
be allowed upon Lots 22 and 23, and no building permit will be
issued for construction of additional housing units on said lots
4
until such time as those lots front on an improved road or, in
the event Blossom Road is vacated, said lots are provided with an
easement for access to an improved road. In any event, a
building permit will be issued for construction on said lots only
if criteria under then current City ordinances for development
are met.
— 7. The City hereby agrees that the temporary easement
referred to on Exhibit "A" as Easement 24A shall expire upon the
uLib
Page -3-
City's acceptance and approval of a development plan for Lot 22
and/or 23 which eliminates the need for the temporary easement
granted herein.
8. The City will restore landscaping of certain decorative
rocks adjacent to the driveway on Lot 23 after the Improvements
are completed.
9. The parties acknowledge that this agreement may be
filed for record against Lots 22 and 23, Eden Prairie Acres,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement this day of
, 1988.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
BY:
Its Mayor
BY:
Its City Manager
Raymon N. Welt r, J
Carole Ann Welter
Lit.i 1
Page -4-
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of , 1988, by Gary D. Peterson and Carl J.
Jullie, the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a
Minnesota municipal corporation on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
, 1988, by Raymond N. Welter, Jr. and
Carole Ann Welter, husband and wife.
risrao4+04 ete•Nviero.roospe-row.54,4
ROBERTA L. ABDO 1
0:10 NOTAP PUBLIC -
'5;lit
HENNEPIN COUNTY
Cornm.ssion Expacs Oct 29 1991
dp444NN-do..N
N~Whos
#6/9465-1.CP
RFR/02-09-88
day of.--
.e/ 17A
Notary Public
cr-11
-MEMORANDUM-
TO:
Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician
410
DATE: March 9, 1988
SUBJECT: GRADING PERMIT APPLICATION 88-06
18194 ULLMAN CIRCLE
Mr. Steve Kohles, owner of property located at 18194 Ullman Circle, has
requested approval of a permit for grading at the above address. The request
consists of construction of an earth berm along the rear property line which
abutts Valley View Road (refer to attached drawing), intended for reduction
of visual and noise interference.
The applicant estimates approximately 200 cubic yards of material will be
necessary to construct the berm 2 to 3 feet high with 3 to 1 side slopes.
Drainage course revisions will be necessary with the bulk of the site runoff
to be directed to exit the property near the northeast corner. This
construction will not interfere with drainage from adjacent properties.
There is a potential for erosion from the site during spring rains. Eroded
material will deposit on the bituminous walkway adjacent the property. The
applicant proposes to furnish daily inspection and cleanup of material
deposited on the walkway. The applicant also proposes to place topsoil and
sod at the earliest possible date this Spring.
Approval of the grading permit is recommended subject to the following
conditions:
1. Berms are substantially shaped and graded at the earliest date permitted
by soil and weather conditions. Berms are finish graded and restored
with topsoil and sod by June 1, 1988.
2. Applicant shall provide daily inspection and cleanup of the walkway
adjacent the proposed berms. The City Engineer may require the
installation of erosion control materials if daily maintenance is
inadequate to control erosion.
3. The applicant shall be responsible for reconstruction of public
facilities (walkways, curbing, boulevards, etc.) damaged during
construction.
--4. The applicant shall coordinate berm construction with private utility
companys (NSP, Minnegasco, etc.) having buried utilities within the
construction limits of the berms and shall be responsible for any damage
to said private utilities.
DO:ss
L1A
No" ck0
33 0,, rad,
Co," aNd
LEGEND
Iron monuments
) existing elevations
proposed elevations
,--eltraw„ direction of propose
surface drainage
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
te1 lowest floor
garage floor
(sa6. sl top of foundation
ka-d 4 it
2Z,2 walfitst 4c1,4
s,t414 — AcLE
Note • Only copies 0110 bear an embossed seal are certified comes
Hansen Thorp
Pellinen Olson Inc.
3 flanthand Lana Sunanen
7565 011.th gala. end.
lath P... Mal 55344 3646
16111 Sa9
I be«by cer ray that this survey was prepared by me or under my soutry.,,o
n
and that I ani .a duty tequtered land Wily. under NarnoesolA Statutes Stetson
326 02 to 326 16 •
7 - .:!/- Oat* Ott s .trat on No
- f. cori?
57
44
Roger's Auto Body
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 44-87
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section I. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the Rural District and be placed in the 1-2 Park District.
Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be,
and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
1-2 Park District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to
in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph 8, shall be, and are
amended accordingly.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of
that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of March 15, 1988, entered into between
Roger L. Lindeman, an individual, and the City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement is
hereby made a part hereof.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 6th day of October, 1987, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 15th day of
March, 1988.
ATTEST:
JOhn D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
(1'5 I
Exhibit A
ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE
That part of the Southwest Quarte
r
o
f
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
2
3
,
T
o
w
n
s
h
i
p
116: Rantie 22 described as follo
w
s
;
B
e
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
a
t
a
p
o
i
n
t
o
n
the West line of said Se.:.tion-23,'a .distance of 600.00 feet South- from the Northwest corner o
f
s
a
i
d
S
o
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
Q
u
a
r
t
e
r
o
f
Section 23; thence East parallel
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
l
i
n
e
o
f
s
a
i
d
Sbuthwest. Quarter a distance of
5
3
8
.
0
0
f
e
e
t
;
-thente South parallel with the • West line ' o
f
.-Said Southwest Quarter a distance of 130.00 feet; thence W
e
s
t
p
a
r
a
l
l
e
l
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
Line - of said Southwest Quarter dist
a
n
c
e
o
f
1
8
3
.
0
0
f
e
e
t
;•thence South A3a•e-allel with the West line of said
S
o
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
-Quarter. a: distance of 78.00 fe
e
t
;
t
h
e
n
c
e
W
e
s
t
p
a
r
a
l
l
e
l
w
i
t
h
the North line of said Southwest
Q
u
a
r
t
e
r
t
o
t
h
e
W
e
s
t
l
i
n
e
thereof;. thence .North .along sa
i
d
W
e
s
t
l
i
n
e
t
o
t
h
e
p
o
i
n
t
o
f
beginning, except mad right-of-way; Hen
n
e
p
i
n
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
PRELIMINARY PLAT
That part of the Southwest Quarter
o
f
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
2
3
,
T
o
w
n
s
h
i
p
116 : Ramp .22 described as follows;
B
e
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
a
t
a
p
o
i
n
t
o
n
the West line of'said 23,
'
a
.distance of 600.00 feet South from the Northwest corner o
f
s
a
i
d
S
o
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
Q
u
a
r
t
e
r
o
f
Section 23; Ithence East parallel
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
l
i
n
e
o
f
s
a
i
d
Sbuthwest. Quarter a distance of
5
3
8
.
0
0
f
e
e
t
;
t
h
e
n
c
e
S
o
u
t
h
parallel' with the • West line o
f
:Said Southwest Quarter a' distance of 130.00 feet; thence We
s
t
:
p
a
r
a
l
l
e
l
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
line - Of said Southwest Quarter a dis
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
1
8
3
.
0
0
f
e
e
t
;
thence South with the Wet
l
i
n
e
o
f
s
a
i
d
S
o
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
Quarter- a: distance of 78.00 fee
t
;
'
t
h
e
n
c
e
W
e
s
t
p
a
r
a
l
l
e
l
w
i
t
h
the North line of said Southwest
Q
u
a
r
t
e
r
t
o
t
h
e
W
e
s
t
l
i
n
e
—thereof;. thence .North.alon7 said 'West line to th
e
p
o
i
n
t
o
f
beginning, Hennepin County, Minnesota
Roger's Auto Body
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered int
o
a
s
o
f
, 1988, by
Roger L. Lindeman, an individual, her
e
i
n
a
f
t
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
t
o
a
s
"
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
,
"
a
n
d
t
h
e
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corpo
r
a
t
i
o
n
,
h
e
r
e
i
n
a
f
t
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
t
o
a
s
"
C
i
t
y
:
"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City
f
o
r
Z
o
n
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
C
h
a
n
g
e
f
r
o
m
R
u
r
a
l
to 1-2 Park on approximately 1.62 a
c
r
e
s
,
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
P
l
a
t
o
f
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1
.
9
3
acres, with variances for lot size
a
n
d
l
o
t
w
i
d
t
h
a
s
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
o
y
t
h
e
B
o
a
r
d
o
f
Appeals, for construction of a 23,911
s
q
.
f
t
.
a
u
t
o
b
o
d
y
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
h
o
p
,
a
l
l
s
a
i
d
1
.
9
3
acres situated in Hennepin County,
S
t
a
t
e
o
f
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
,
m
o
r
e
f
u
l
l
y
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
i
n
Exhibit A, attached hereto and made
a
p
a
r
t
h
e
r
e
o
f
,
a
n
d
s
a
i
d
a
c
r
e
a
g
e
h
e
r
e
i
n
a
f
t
e
r
referred to as "the property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
d
o
p
t
i
n
g
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
#
4
4
-
8
7
,
Developer covenants and agrees to con
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
,
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
a
n
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
o
f
said property as follows:
1. Developer shall develop the prope
r
t
y
i
n
c
o
n
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
materials revised and dated November 2
5
,
1
9
8
7
,
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
a
n
d
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
by the City Council on October 6, 1
9
8
7
,
a
n
d
a
t
t
a
c
h
e
d
h
e
r
e
t
o
a
s
Exhibit B, subject to such changes a
n
d
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
herein. Developer shall not develop,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
p
o
n
,
o
r
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
the property in any other respect or ma
n
n
e
r
t
h
a
n
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
h
e
r
e
i
n
.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
o
b
s
e
r
v
a
n
c
e
b
y
Developer at such times and in such ma
n
n
e
r
a
s
-
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
t
h
e
r
e
i
n
o
f
all of the terms, covenants, agreements
,
a
n
d
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
s
e
t
f
o
r
t
h
i
n
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a
p
a
r
t
h
e
r
e
o
f
.
_
3. Developer acknowledges that the pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
w
i
l
l
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
f
r
o
m
a
n
y
future improvements to the "future r
o
a
d
"
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
boundary of the property, as depicted
i
n
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
B
,
a
t
t
a
c
h
e
d
h
e
r
e
t
o
,
and agrees to pay its fair share o
f
t
h
e
c
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
i
n
g
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
assessments for street, sidewalk s and utility construction for said improvements. Therefore, prior to rele
a
s
e
b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
o
f
t
h
e
f
i
n
a
l
4/15.3
plat, Developer agrees to execute a special assessment agreement
with the City for purposes of construction of said improvements to
service the property.
4. Prior to release by the City of the final plat, Developer agrees to
submit to the Building Department, and to obtain the Building
Department's approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls
indicated on the grading plan in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said
plans shall include details with respect to the height, type of
materials, and method of construction to be used for said retaining
walls.
Upon approval by the Building Department, Developer agrees
t
o
construct said retaining wall improvements as stated above,
a
s
approved by the Building Department, concurrent with the grading a
n
d
street construction on the property, and in accordance with t
h
e
terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
5. Prior to release by the City of the final plat, Developer agrees
t
o
submit to the City an executed agreement with each of the t
w
o
abutting land owners to the south involving construction,
maintenance, and use of the temporary driveway access designat
e
d
along the westerly 300 feet of the southern boundary of th
e
property, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
6. Prior to issuance of any grading permit on the property, Develope
r
agrees to obtain a right-of-entry from the land owner to the north
for grading off-site along the north side of the property, a
s
depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
7. Prior to any issuance of any permit for grading or building on th
e
property, Developer agrees to submit to the Building Department an
d
obtain the Building Department's approval of plans for demolitio
n
and/or removal of existing structures, wells, and septic systems on
the property.
Prior to demolition or removal, Developers shall provide to the City
a certified check in the amount of $1,000.00 to guarantee the
restoration of the property to grade.
City agrees to return said certified check to Developer after the
demolition or removal on the property is completed and after it is
verified by City that the structures, wells, and/or septic systems
have been properly removed or demolished, and that the property has
been restored to grade.
8. Developer agrees to notify the City and the Watershed District
a
t
least 48 hours in advance of any grading on the property.
9. Prior to issuance of any permit for grading upon the propert
y
,
Developer agrees to implement erosion control measures and adequ
a
t
e
protective measures for areas to be preserved and areas whe
r
e
grading is not to occur, and ._to obtain City approval of sa
i
d
measures. Prior to approval by the City, the Developer must ca
l
l
for on-site inspection of the property by the C
i
t
y
,
and defects in materials and workmanship in the implementat
i
o
n
o
f
s
a
i
d
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
shall then be determined by the City. Defe
c
t
s
i
n
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
o
r
workmanship shall then be corrected by the De
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
,
r
e
i
n
s
p
e
c
t
e
d
and approved by the City prior to issuance of
t
h
e
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
p
e
r
m
i
t
b
y
the City. Approval of materials and workmanshi
p
m
a
y
b
e
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
to such conditions as the City may impose at the t
i
m
e
o
f
a
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
.
10. Developer agrees to confine grading to that
a
r
e
a
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
within the construction limits as approved b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
.
Developer shall place snow fencing at the constr
u
c
t
i
o
n
l
i
m
i
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
property prior to any grading upon the property.
11. Prior to issuance of any building permit
u
p
o
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer
,
a
n
d
o
b
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Engineer's approval of plans for streets, s
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
s
e
w
e
r
,
w
a
t
e
r
,
storm sewer, and erosion control for the prope
r
t
y
.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Develop
e
r
s
h
a
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
,
o
r
cause to be constructed, those improvements
l
i
s
t
e
d
a
b
o
v
e
i
n
s
a
i
d
plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
C, attached hereto.
12. Developer acknowledges that the property wi
l
l
n
o
t
h
a
v
e
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
sewage disposal capacity at this time for the
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
w
a
s
h
a
r
e
a
,
depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Developer agrees, therefore, that the wash area shall not be uti
l
i
z
e
d
u
n
t
i
l
s
u
c
h
t
i
m
e
as the property is connected to public sanitary
s
e
w
e
r
a
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
.
In consideration thereof, Developer agrees as foll
o
w
s
:
A. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
,
Developer shall submit to the Building Depa
r
t
m
e
n
t
,
a
n
d
obtain the Building Department's approval of
p
l
a
n
s
f
o
r
a
temporary septic tank and drain field system o
f
s
u
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
size to treat a minimum of 300 gallons per day
o
f
d
o
m
e
s
t
i
c
strength sewage.
Upon approval by the Building Department of
s
a
i
d
p
l
a
n
s
,
Developer agrees to construct, or cause to be
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
,
those improvements listed above in said plan
s
,
a
s
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
by the Building Department, in accordance with
t
h
e
t
e
r
m
s
a
n
d
conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
B. The use of water at this facility is hereby
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
t
o
t
o
the uses approved herein, within the design c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
on-site treatment system, and to discharge
o
n
l
y
d
o
m
e
s
t
i
c
waste to the treatment system.
C. Developer will not allow chemicals, oils,
o
r
f
u
e
l
s
t
h
a
t
might be used, or present, on the property to
b
e
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
d
to the on-site treatment system and will ob
t
a
i
n
f
r
o
m
a
l
l
necessary permits and approvals from the Minnes
o
t
a
P
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
Control Agency for property disposal of sai
d
c
h
e
m
i
c
a
l
s
,
oils, or fuels.
D. The use of the on-site sewage treatment system shall be
discontinued, that said system shall be properly
disconnected, and removed according to City Code
requirements, and that Developer shall connect to public
sanitary sewer within six (6) months of notification that
public sanitary sewer is available to the property.
13. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property,
Developer agrees to submit to the Director of Planning and to obtain
the Director's approval of a revised landscaping and screening plan
which includes details for screening along the south property line
from adjacent differing uses and from the public street.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer agrees to
implement said plan, as approved by the Director of Planning.
14. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property,
Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and obtain the
Director's approval of the following:
A. Detailed plans for lighting on the property, indicating the
color, style, height, and location of lighting materials to
be used.
B. Detailed plans for signage on the property, indicating the
colors, style of letters, materials, and location of signs
to be used.
C. Detailed plans indicating the exterior materials to be used
on the structures on the property, including color samples,
textures, and the location of materials to be used.
Materials used for screening of exterior mechanical
equipment shall be architecturally compatible with the
materials used on the structure.
Upon approval by the Director of,Planning, Developer agrees to
implement the materials listed above according to the detailed
plans, all as approved by the Director of Planning.
15. Developer acknowledges that the 1-2 Zoning District does not permit
outdoor storage. Outdoor storage as relates to vehicles would be
any vehicle in excess of 3/4 ton. If the area designated for
outdoor storage on the property is utilized by Developer, Developer
agrees that it shall be utilized under the following conditions,
only:
A. The storage area shall be used to store only the following
types of vehicles: cars, vans, and -small pick-up trucks.
Any vehicle in excess of 3/4 ton would be required to be
stored inside the structure.
B. Developer shall screen the outdoor storage of the vehicles
by installation of a six-foot high cedar fence, as described
and detailed in Exhibit 0, attached hereto and Made a part
hereof.•
Roger's Auto Body
• CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-40
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE 44-87 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 44-87 was adopted and ordered publis
h
e
d
a
t
a
r
e
g
u
l
a
r
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie o
n
t
h
e
1
5
t
h
d
a
y
o
f
M
a
r
c
h
,
1988;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF T
H
E
C
I
T
Y
O
F
E
D
E
N
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 44-87, w
h
i
c
h
i
s
attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds
t
h
a
t
s
a
i
d
text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect
o
f
s
a
i
d
ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie N
e
w
s
i
n
a
body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as de
f
i
n
e
d
i
n
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made avail
a
b
l
e
f
o
r
inspection by any person during regular office hours at th
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 44-87 shall be recorded in the ordin
a
n
c
e
b
o
o
k
,
along with proof of publication required by paragraph
B
h
e
r
e
i
n
,
within 20 days after said publicatton.
ADOPTED by the City Council on March 15, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
—John D. Frane, City Clerk
(-1,9 )
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
RESOLUTION NO. 88-39
A RESOLUTION COMMENDING THE EDEN PRAIRIE HIGH SCHOOL
GIRLS GYMNASTICS TEAM FOR WINNING THE MINNESOTA
STATE HIGH SCHOOL "AA" CHAMPIONSHIP
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie wishes to
recognize achievements which demonstrate community pride and excellence;
and
WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Eagles girls high school gymnastics team has
proven its excellence by winning the 1988 Minnesota State High School "AA"
Championship; and
WHEREAS, the team has honored the community not once, but twice by
winning this championship for two consecutive years;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie, on behalf of the entire Eden Prairie community, to hereby commend
the Eden Prairie Eagles girls gymnastics team for its championship
performance and thank its members for representing us so well; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City express its earnest support for
the team as it goes for its third straight title!
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council this 15th day of March, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #88-36
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF A TO Z RENTAL FOR
A TO Z RENTAL
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of A to Z Rental for A to Z Rental, dated March 11, 1988,
consisting of 3.59 acres into one lot and one outlot, a copy of which is on file at
the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairi
e
Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 15th day of March, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
•n
c*,
V..
q 60
AREA LOCATICA MAP r,
U L,0
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
7131-5UGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
Planning Comnission
Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
February 15, 1988
Eden Prairie Rental Center
Southwest corner of Valley View Road and Plaza Drive
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER: A to Z Rental
REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to C-Regional Service on 1.67
acres with variances for outdoor storage and rear yard setback to
be reviewed by the Board of Appeals.
2. Preliminary Plat of 3.59 acres into one lot and one outlot.
Background
This site is currently designated on
the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide
Plan for Regional Commercial land
uses. Surrounding designations
within this area include Regional
Commercial land uses to the north,
south, east, and west. Specific land
uses include vacant property to the
north; Menard's Plaza, zoned C-
Regional Service to the south; the
Factory Outlet Center to the east of
Plaza Drive, also zoned C-Regional
Service; and, the Menard's complex,
zoned C-Regional Service to the
west. The proponent is requesting a
zoning district change from Rural to
C-Regional Service to allow for the
construction of a 15,500 square foot
building.
Land Use
The proposed land uses on this site-
include the A to Z Rental Center
along with their outdoor storage
facility and additional retail
space. The building, containing
Eden Prairie Rental Center 2 February 19, 1988
approximately 15,500 square feet, would be a combination of retail and warehouse
space, and outdoor storage for trucks and other heavy equipment. Calculations of
square footages for this building would include approximately 9,500 square feet
dedicated to retail space and approximately 6,000 square feet dedicated to warehouse
space.
A significant feature of this site plan includes an area of approximately 14,500
square feet of outdoor storage located to the rear of Phase I serving the A to Z
Rental Center. Because the proponent is requesting the C-Regional Service zoning
district, a variance is required to allow for any outdoor storage exceeding ten
percent of the ground floor area of the primary building. The ground floor area of
the building is 3,500 square feet so 350 square feet of outdoor storage would be
allowed. The proponent has submitted an application for a variance for outdoor
storage in this location. Outdoor storage was originally approved in this area with
the Menard's building approved in 1978.
The A to Z Rental Center had previously requested and received approval for a
variance to allow outside storage to exceed ten percent of the floor area of the
building in which they are currently located. This variance request approval was
#84-06 and approved January 12, 1984. Specific conditions of the previously
approved variance include:
1. That the variance must be utilized within one year.
2. Fencing of the same material and color as Menard's fencing be used.
3. Fencing of sufficient height to screen all equipment from public rons be
installed.
As a condition to the requested variance, it should be stated that all outdoor
storage including but not limited to trucks, trailers, heavy equipment, or other
similiar items shall be limited to that area behind the Phase I building.
Site Plan
The site plan depicts the construction of a building containing approximately 15,500
square feet to be divided into three phases. Phase I, consisting of 7,100 square
feet will be the location of the new A to Z Rental Center. Both Phases I and II are
designed as two-story buildings which includes the upper level as retail/display
space with the lower level as warehouse for the storage of A to Z rental equipment.
Phases I and II will contain a total of approximately 12,446 square feet. Based
upon a use designation of 50 percent retail and 50 percent warehouse, parking has
been calculated using 6 spaces/1,000 square feet for retail and 1 space/2,000 square
feet for warehouse. Using-these figures, total parking required for Phase I would
be 24; Phase II, 18; and, Phase III, 19 spaces. Actual Phase I parking to be
constructed is 30 spaces. A total of 61 stalls are required on-site and are
provided on the plan.
Access to this site would be provided from Plaza Drive through the use of two access
easements. The existing access easement along the south property line will continue
to serve Menard's Plaza and also provide additional access to the property to the
north. The north access point from Plaza Drive is -designed to align with the access
to the Factory Outlet Center while providing service to this site and the site to
the north.
Eden Prairie Rental Center 3 February 19, 1988
The proposed building meets the minimum requirements of the
C
-
R
e
g
-
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
district. A variance for a zero lot line rear yard setback
t
o
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
requested in order to allow for the proper front yard setback
a
n
d
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
along the front of the building. Zero lot line variance req
u
e
s
t
s
i
n
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
districts have been allowed for previous proposals.
Grading
This site, currently vacant, slopes from approximately the 8
7
4
c
o
n
t
o
u
r
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
along the north property line to the 862 contour elevation in t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
.
The intent of the grading plan is to provide for the develop
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
t
w
o
-
s
t
o
r
y
building with the upper story being level with Plaza Drive and
t
h
e
l
o
w
e
r
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
Phases I and II approximately 10 to 12 feet lower. Retai
n
i
n
g
w
a
l
l
s
a
r
e
b
e
i
n
g
constructed to allow for the grade difference of approximatel
y
1
0
f
e
e
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
upper level and the lower level. This allows for the utili
z
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
t
w
o
-
s
t
o
r
y
building and provides a significant amount of natural scre
e
n
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
storage area proposed behind the Phase I building. The c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
b
e
r
m
s
,
approximately 4 to 41/2 feet in height along Plaza Drive, are p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
t
o
s
c
r
e
e
n
t
h
e
parking areas.
Screening of Outdoor Storage
In reviewing the proposed plan for outdoor storage, the buildin
g
a
n
d
s
i
t
e
p
l
a
n
h
a
v
e
been designed to allow for the outside storage to be locat
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
r
e
a
r
o
f
t
h
e
property. The elevation of the outdoor storage area is approx
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1
0
f
e
e
t
l
o
w
e
r
than Plaza Drive. This difference in elevation allows for t
h
e
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
outdoor storage area from Plaza Drive. In addition, the prop
o
n
e
n
t
h
a
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
a
significant amount of screening through the use of landscaping
a
n
d
b
e
r
m
s
.
O
n
e
a
r
e
a
of concern is the screening of the outdoor storage area from V
a
l
l
e
y
V
i
e
w
R
o
a
d
.
W
i
t
h
the construction of Phase I, it appears that there will be
a
n
o
p
e
n
v
i
e
w
o
f
t
h
e
storage area from Valley View Road and the Topview neighbor
h
o
o
d
.
T
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
should submit site sections from Valley View Road and the Top
v
i
e
w
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
t
o
indicate the visual aspects. A grading plan for the -first ph
a
s
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
h
a
l
l
be submitted. At a minimum, the plan shall depict a berm al
o
n
g
t
h
e
n
c
r
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
Phase I which adequately screens the outdoor storage from Valley
V
i
e
w
R
o
a
d
.
Utilities
Water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer are available t
o
t
h
i
s
s
i
t
e
.
T
h
e
r
e
i
s
a
n
eight-inch sanitary sewer line, an eight-inch water line, and
a
n
1
8
-
i
n
c
h
s
t
o
r
m
s
e
w
e
r
line along the west property line between the existing Menar
d
'
s
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
the proposed building. Appropriate connections will be ma
d
e
t
o
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
t
h
e
t
h
r
e
e
phases.
Landscaping
Based on the total building square footage of 15,551 squ
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
,
a
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
4
9
caliper inches of plant material are required. The proposed l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
p
l
a
n
d
e
p
i
c
t
s
nine, eight-foot Colorado blue spruce trees which are the on
l
y
t
r
e
e
s
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
a
s
shade trees for the calculation of the caliper inch--requireme
n
t
.
,
S
t
a
f
f
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
that the Techny Arborvitae along the southern property li
n
e
b
e
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
d
w
i
t
h
a
combination of six and eight-foot evergreens in order to provi
d
e
b
e
t
t
e
r
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
o
f
the proposeci,outdoor storage area and loading docks and t
o
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
c
a
l
i
p
e
r
i
n
c
h
Eden Prairie Rental Center 4 February 19, 1988
requirement. Finally, trees within the front yard should inclu
d
e
a
c
o
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
overstory trees along with additional coniferous trees plante
d
i
n
g
r
o
u
p
s
t
o
b
r
e
a
k
u
p
parking lot areas and building mass. These revisions sha
l
l
b
e
m
a
d
e
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
C
i
t
y
Council review.
Architecture
The building, measuring approximately 180 feet in length and
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
t
o
w
a
r
d
s
P
l
a
z
a
Drive, is designed as a typical retail center. Primary buil
d
i
n
g
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
facebrick, glass, and stucco, with the rear elevation of P
h
a
s
e
s
I
a
n
d
I
I
a
s
r
o
c
k
face block. Building material percentages have been calculate
d
a
t
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
7
2
%
facebrick or better. The building design includes a 6-foot
m
e
t
a
l
c
a
n
o
p
y
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
to that on the existing Menards building. This, in addition t
o
c
o
m
p
a
r
a
b
l
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
materials is intended to bind the buildings together archit
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
l
y
.
I
n
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
retail center approvals, the City Council has recommend
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
f
r
o
n
t
s
i
d
e
architecture be carried around the sides and partially
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
r
e
a
r
o
f
t
h
e
buildings in order to improve the visual appearance of th
e
r
e
a
r
o
f
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
.
The front side architecture, including the metal canopy with a
m
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
s
t
u
c
c
o
b
a
n
d
,
should be extended around the building to accomplish three pur
p
o
s
e
s
:
1. Improve the visual appearance of the rear of the building.
2. Screen any proposed mechanical equipment.
3. Comply with the City Code requirement of 75% facebrick or b
e
t
t
e
r
.
Finally, because the building is being phased with Phases I
I
a
n
d
I
I
I
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
subject to market conditions, it is not known when Phase I
I
w
i
l
l
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
.
Typically, when buildings are phased such as this, the com
m
o
n
w
a
l
l
w
i
l
l
r
e
m
a
i
n
concrete block. Concern has been raised about the visual
a
s
p
e
c
t
s
o
f
t
h
i
s
a
n
d
whether or not Phase II will ever be built. Because of this, Sta
f
f
w
o
u
l
d
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
that face brick be continued along the north elevation of Pha
s
e
I
I
.
Si rg_iage and Liduitirig_
No signage or lighting details have been submitted at t
h
i
s
t
i
m
e
.
B
e
c
a
u
s
e
t
h
i
s
retail center will be put together as a package, Staff wo
u
l
d
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
t
h
a
t
a
detailed signage program, with lettering of a consistant s
i
z
e
,
t
y
p
e
,
a
n
d
c
o
l
o
r
b
e
submitted for review prior to the City Council meeting. Th
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
s
h
a
l
l
a
l
s
o
submit an overall lighting plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
If the Planning Corrrnission feels comfortable with the pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
s
i
t
e
p
l
a
n
,
S
t
a
f
f
would recommend approval of the request for Rezoning of appr
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1
6
a
c
r
e
s
f
r
o
m
Rural to C-Regional Service, and a Preliminary Plat of 3.5
a
c
r
e
s
i
n
t
o
o
n
e
l
o
t
a
n
d
oze outlot, based upon plans dated February 2, 1988, a
n
d
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
t
h
e
S
t
a
f
f
Report, dated February 15, 1988, and subject to the following
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Revise the landscape plan to reflect a •combination of six and
e
i
g
h
t
-
foot coniferous trees along the south property line in or
d
e
r
t
o
screen the storage areas and overhead doors and edd.a combination of deciduous and coniferous trees along Plaza Drive td screen p
a
r
k
i
n
g
areas.
Eden Prairie Rental Center 5 February 19, 1988
B. Revise the architecture of the proposed building to reflect the
continuation of the front side architecture partially along the rear
of the building and to demonstrate that the mechanical equipment
will be screened. The revised elevations shall meet the City Code
requirement of 75% facebrick or better.
C. Submit building material samples and colors for review.
D. Submit a Phase I grading plan which depicts, at a minimum, a berm
along the north side of Phase I which adequately screens the outdoor
storage from Valley View Road.
E. Submit a north building elevation for Phase I which depicts all
f acebrick.
F. Submit easements for the two accesses from Plaza Drive.
G. Submit site sections which depicts the views from Valley View Road
and Topview neighborhood for both the Phase I grading plan and final
building construction.
H. Submit an overall signage and lighting program.
2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off, erosion control, and Lility
plans for review by the City Engineer.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall pay the appropriate Cash
Park Fee.
4. Prior to Grading permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading.
B. Stake the construction limits with erosion control fencing.
5. Apply for, and receive approval, of the variance requests for outside
storage and zero lot line setback to the rear property line.
6. Concurrent with building construction, a 5-foot concrete sidewalk shall be
constructed along the west side of Plaza Drive.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
Monday, February 22, 1988
7:30 PM
IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
A. A TO Z RENTAL, by A to Z Rental. Re
q
u
e
s
t
f
o
r
Z
o
n
i
n
g
District Change from Rural to C-Reg-Ser
v
i
c
e
o
n
1
.
6
7
a
c
r
e
s
with variances to be reviewed by the Boa
r
d
o
f
A
p
p
e
a
l
s
,
Preliminary Plat of 3.59 acres into one
l
o
t
a
n
d
o
n
e
outlot for construction of a 15,500 squa
r
e
f
o
o
t
r
e
t
a
i
l
facility. Location: Southwest corner o
f
V
a
l
l
e
y
V
i
e
w
Road and Plaza Drive.
e;.- 1
Uram reported the proposed use on this site would include the
A to Z Rental Center along with an outdoor storage facility
and additional retail space. The building consisting of
15,500 square feet would be a combination of retail and
warehouse space. The outdoor storage would be for trucks and
other heavy equipment. The proponent has submitted an
application for a variance for outdoor storage. A to Z
Rental received approval for a variance for outside storage
in 1984 to exceed ten percent of the floor area of the
building in which they are currently located, called Phase I.
Roman Roos, representative for proponent, presented the
preliminary plat indicating Phase I, II and III. He stated
the elevations of this site permitted outside storage with
adequate screening. He pointed out the planned screening in
all phases of the project, whereby the landscaping would
screen the parking lot without hiding the facility. A zero
lot line setback on the rear property line has been applied
for through the Board of Appeals.
Parking for the two story building was based on 1 per
population of 2000. He stated that all trucks would be
parked on the back side of Phase I. If Phase II and III did
not go forward as planned, they would add more berm for
screening.
Roos indicated to Council that approval of all phases at this
time was essential to the primary lender who has requested the
City's assurance the project would continue whereby Phase II
and Phase III would be developed.
Uram pointed out three areas of concern on the project. The
outside storage site plan was 12' lower than Plaza Drive and
would need a variance. The zero lot line setback question
would be addressed by the Board of Appeals. Mr. Way would
move into Phase I immediately. They have agreed to a bond
for the amount of the berming if Phase II does not occur.
They would construct a berm until Phase II and III are
completed. As was indicated in the Staff Report 75% brick
face was recommended and required by City Code and at present
there was 72% on this project.
Uram reported that Staff Recommendations prior to Council
review are: 1) revise the landscape plan to reflect a
combination of six and eight-foot evergreen trees along the
south property line in order to screen the storage areas; 2)
revise the architecture of the proposed building to reflect
the continuation of the front side architecture partially
along the rear of the building and to demonstrate that the
mechanical equipment would be screened; 3) submit building
material samples and colors for review which should be the
same color family as Menards; 4) submit a Phase I. grading
plan which depicts a berm along the north side of Phase I
2
screening the outdoor storage from Valley View Road; 5)
submit a north building elevation for Phase I which depicts
all face brick; 6) submit easements for the two accesses from
Plaza Drive (these have been submitted); 7) submit site
sections which depict the views from Valley View Road and
Topview neighborhood for both the Phase I grading plan and
final building construction; 8) submit an overall signage and
lighting program with the size of letters and colors;
9) submit the usual utility plans for review by the City
Engineer, and erosion control plans for review by the Water-
shed District; 10) apply for and receive approval of the
variance required for outside storage and zero lot line
setback to the rear property line; 11) concurrent with
building construction, a 5-foot concrete sidewalk shall be
constructed along the west side of Plaza Drive; and 12)
rooftop mechanical equipment screening should be supplied and
required.
Ruebling stated that screening the outside storage along
Valley View Drive has always been a problem, and inquired how
the proponent intended to fully screen this area. Proponent
replied there was a 12' elevation difference and with the 6
and 8 foot evergreens, the storage area should be well
screened.
Hallett inquired about rooftop screening. Proponent stated
there was plenty of room to screen mechanical rooftop
equipment.
Ruebling inquired if berming would take place prior to Phase
II and III thereby raising the elevation line. Proponent
replied affirmatively. Ruebling countered that it was
difficult to visualize how it would be totally hidden.
Franzen stated that in his experience of screening community
projects, from some angle they are always visible. On this
project, it might be visible due to thd hire elevation of
Valley View Road. However, he felt, berming and landscaping
would block most of the view.
Proponent inquired what the difference was between having 75%
face brick and 73%. Staff replied that 75% was City Code and
it has not been deviated from in any project to date.
Dodge stated that the face brick requirement was an ordinance
and all other City projects have conformed.
Roos stated that proponent would add 3% brick to comply with
City Ordinance.
There were no comments from the audience.
Hallett inquired of Staff if notices were mailed. Uram
replied that the residents were contacted, and one phone call
was received regarding the project.
3
LIO
Bye asked for clarification of Phase I. Proponent replied
that Phase I would contain A to Z rental party goods and
medium to small equipment. The 3500 ft. retail area wou
l
d
b
e
for two potential tenants. Phase II would be all inside
storage.
Hallett inquired about the variance of more than 10% out
s
i
d
e
storage. Uram replied it would be appropriate in this
instance in view of the fact that it was granted previousl
y
in 1984 and the overall project would bring about an enh
a
n
c
e
d
situation that what was presently on the site.
Uram stated that the Commission could consider, because P
h
a
s
e
I received a variance of the 10%, that no additional out
s
i
d
e
storage be requested in Phase II and III.
Ruebling stated he was comfortable with the plan and endo
r
s
e
d
the limitation to outside storage in Phase II and III.
Franzen stated that a variance was being requested for A
t
o
Z
Rental not the retailers in Phase III. The tenants in Ph
a
s
e
III would have to come before the Board of Appeals for mo
r
e
than 10% outside storage.
MOTION 1;
Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Anderson to close
p
u
b
l
i
c
hearing.
Motion carried 4-0-0.
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Anderson to recomme
n
d
to the City Council approval of the request of A to Z Ren
t
a
l
for Zoning District Change from Rural to C-Reg-Service on
1.67 acres, with variances to be reviewed by the Board of
Appeals, based on plans dated February 2, 1988, subject to
the recommendations of the Staff Report dated February 19,
1988, amended to include: 1) plans for mechanical screenin
g
be submitted prior to Council review; 2) variance request be
applied to Phase I and Phase II regarding outside storage;
and 3) Phase III would be allowed its own 10% outside
storage.
Motion carried 4-0-0
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Anderson to recom
m
e
n
d
to the City Council approval of the request of A to Z Re
n
t
a
l
for Preliminary Plat of 1.59 acres into one lot and one
outlot for construction of a 15,500 sq. ft. retail facili
t
y
,
based on plans dated February 2, 1988, subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report dated February 19, 19
8
8
.
Motion carried 4-0-0.
4
Ut
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
71-1UGH:
DATE:
RE:
Mayor and City Council
David Lindahl, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
March 7, 1988
YEAR XIV (1988-89) PROPOSED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
PROGRAM
Hennepin County has indicated that Eden Prairie is eligible to app
l
y
f
o
r
$
6
4
,
8
5
3
i
n
Community Development Block Grant funds for the Year XIV funding ye
a
r
.
The overall objective of the CDBG program is to provide hous
i
n
g
a
n
d
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
opportunities for low and moderate income families, elderly, a
n
d
h
a
n
d
i
c
a
p
p
e
d
individuals.
Hennepin County is again requesting, as part of this year's local
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
,
t
h
a
t
no more than three activities be undertaken by any one community, a
n
d
e
a
c
h
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
should be budgeted with at least $7,500.00.
After requests were made to local churches, community services or
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
l
o
w
income service providers, the City's Human Services Director, and C
i
t
y
D
e
p
a
r
.
t
m
e
n
t
Heads, for ideas on activities that will address the needs of the lo
w
a
n
d
m
o
d
e
r
a
t
e
income in Eden Prairie, Staff has determined that the existing Year
X
I
I
I
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
should again be approved for funding in 1988.
Staff is recommending that the Year XIV allocation be applied tow
a
r
d
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
Year XIII activities in the following way:
NAME OF ACTIVITY
PROPOSED ALLOCATION
(I) Public Service Activities:
a. Household and Outside Maintenance for
the Elderly (H.O.M.E.) - $ 3,325.00
b. Greater Minneapolis Day Care
Associatiog (G.M.D.C.A.) - $15,000.00
(2) Housing Rehabilitation - $10,000.00
(3) Scattered Site Housing Assistance -
$36,528.00
TOTAL ALLOCATION $64,853.00
PROPOSED CDBG ACTIVITIES (YEAR XIV 1988)
ACTIVITY/BUDGET/PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
*HOUSEHOLD AND OUTSIDE MAINTENANCE FOR ELDERLY (H.O.M.E.)
This program provides household and light outside maintenance •to seniors 60 and
over. Services include heavy house cleaning, laundry, snow removal, small appliance
repair, installation of storm and screen windows, grocery shopping, and light
carpentry wprk. Since 1983, Eden Prairie has contributed, via CDBG funds, $13,916,
of which $11,297 has been expendEd serving 37 households. The remaining $2,619 is
expected to be spent within the next 11 months. The proposed $3,325 will facilitate
the program through 1988. Staff feels this is an appropriate allocation.
*GREATER MINNEAPOLIS DAY CARE ASSOCIATION
This program provides subsidized day care for low-income families. Funding Year XI
(1985-86) was the first year in which Eden Prairie contributed through the COBS
program. Since then, $3),002 has been ccntributed to the program. The program has
subsidized nine families, six of which are single-parent households. Staff feels
$15,000 is an appropriate allocation for the next program year.
*HOUSING REHABILITATION GRANT PROGRAM
This program provides funds through a grant for housing improvements to income
eligible households. The City served two households with $2,621 in grant funds in
1987. Staff feels $10,000 is an appropriate allocation for the next program year.
*SCATTERED SITE HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
This program provides assistarce to low-moderate income families in purchasing homes
in Eden Prairie. The City uses CDBG funds to subsidize lot costs of homes being
purchased by qualified families, therefore enabling them to purchase a home which
they might not otherwise have been able to afford., The City will place a second
mortgage on the property for the lot subsidy, which will be recovered in full when
the home is sold.
The Scattered Site Program, by creating opportunities for low-moderate income
families to purchase homes of their own, promotes ownership, increases the supply of
affordable, habitable dwellings in Eden Prairie, and recovers CDBG funds originally
comnitted to the project.
Allocating the remaining balance of $36,528 to the Scattered Site Program will
assist three or four families in purchasing homes in Eden Prairie thrOugh 1988.
*Program has been previously funded.
A recomnendation to fund specific activities is required from the City Council prior
to submitting a proposal for the funds to Hennepin County.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-35
RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED PROGRAM FOR YEAR XIV
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING ITS SUBMITTAL
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, through execution of a Joint
Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is a cooperating unit in the Urb
a
n
County Community Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, has developed a proposal for
the use of Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds made available to it, following a pu
b
l
i
c
hearing on March 15, 1988, to obtain the views of citizens on local and Urb
a
n
Hennepin County housing and community development needs and the City's followi
n
g
proposed use of Year XIV Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block
G
r
a
n
t
funds.
(Projects)
(1) Public Service Activities:
a. Household and Outside Maintenance for
the Elderly (H.O.M.E.) -
b. Greater Minneapolis Day Care
Association (G.M.D.C.A.) -
(2) Housing Rehabilitation -
(3) Scattered Site Housing Assistance -
(Budget)
$ 3,325.00
$15,000.00
$10,000.00
$36,528.00
$64,853.00
(Total)
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden Pnairie, Minnesota, approves the proposed use of Year XIII Urban Hennepin County Community Development
B
l
o
c
k
Grant funds and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin Count
y
f
o
r
consideration by the Citizen Advisory Committee and for inclusion in the Year
X
I
V
Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Statement of Objectives
a
n
d
Project Use of Funds.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
It.007
1008
41009
41010
41011
41012
41013
41014
41015
41016
41017
41018
41019
41020
41021
41022
41023
41024
41025
41026
41027
41028
41029
41030
41031
1 032
033
41034
41035
41036
41037
41038
41039
41040
41041
41042
41043
41044
41045
41046
41047
41048
41049
41050
41051
41052
41053
41054
41055
41056
41057
DANA GIBBS
US POSTMASTER
AWWA CONFERENCE 1988
KEVIN BOLLIG
SONJA BROWN
BIRTCHER WELSH
NANCY BURGETT
CITICORP INDUSTRIAL CREDIT INC
CYNTHIA COLLINS
JIM DETERT
EAGLE WINE CO
SUSAN FLAGG
GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC
KIP HAMILTON
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
JASON-NORTHCO PROP LP#1
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
EARLA KRAUS
LMCIT
JANICE LOULA
LORI MCMILLAN
KAREN MCMULLEN
JOAN NELSON
PAUSTIS & SONS CO
PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT
ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
PRIOR WINE CO
QUALITY WINE CO
MARY RYAN
VICKI SYSLO
DINH FINH THAI
TTTC
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
JOAN WAGNER
THE WINE CO
BUREAU OF ATF
MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC
AT&T
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS
AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NSP
PETTY CASH
BIFFS INC
JOHN E CARLON III
EDEN INCENTIVES & PROMOTIONS INC
ENGCO GENERAL CONTRACTORS
FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY
GROSS OFFICE SUPPLY
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC
KRAEMERS HOME CENTER
MARCH 15,1988
PACKET DELIVERIES 171.00
POSTAGE-POLICE DEPT 890.00
CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT 285.00 REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 20.00
REFUND-AQUA AEROBICS 27.00
MARCH 88 RENT 16006.55
REFUND-FOR KIDS ONLY 10.00
MARCH 88 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 656.81
REFUND-FOR KIDS ONLY 14.00
REFUND-BEGINNING SCUBA DIVING 110.00
WINE 1749.84
REFUND-SKATING LESSONS 38.00
LIQUOR 6895.41
REFUND-SKI TRIP 6.00
SCHOOL-COMMUNITY CENTER 35.00
MARCH 88 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 5518.75
LIQUOR 9398.69
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 18.00
LIABILITY INSURANCE-CITY HALL 41567.00
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 44.00
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 20.00
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 17.00
REFUND-SKATING LESSONS 19.00
WINE 93.96
EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 12.02
LIQUOR 12316.47
WINE 857.43
LIQUOR 5208.35
REFUND-SKATING LESSONS 19.00
REFUND-CENTER CARE 8.00
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 20.00
CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT 35.00
CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT 120.00 REFUND-AQUA AEROBLP 27.00
WINE 375.95
RETAIL DEALER LICENSE-LIQUOR STORES 196.00
SERVICE-SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT 40.00 SERVICE 831.75
SERVICE 148.51 SERVICE 24.45 SERVICE 318.91 SERVICE 39146.81
EXPENSES-CITY HALL 64.29 FEBRUARY 88 WASTE DISPOSAL 360.00 MILEAGE/EXPENSES-STREET MAINTENANCE 13.30 HATS-FIRE DEPT 572.48 SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER RENOVATION 5307.37 SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 324.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 255.5? BEARING-PARK MAINTENANCE 9.62 -SHELVES/BRACKETS/HOSE/HOOKS/HOSE REEL/ 517.61 -STUD SENSOR/HANDERS/SQUEEGIE/NUTS/BOLTS/
-HANDLE/BATTERIES/MENDING PLATE/CORNER
-IRON/PIPE/PIPE FITTINGS/LOAD BINDER/
-CARPET RUNNER/CLOTHESLINE/SEALANT/
-CORDLESS DRILL-PARK MAINTENANCE/EQUIPMENT
15074151
472
MAINTENANCE/WATER DEPT
CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
GAS CYLINDERS-COMMUNITY CENTER
POSTAGE-SPRING BROCHURE-COMMUNITY SERVICE
POSTAGE-MARCH/APRIL SENIOR NEWSLETTER
MARCH 88 RENT-LIQUOR STORE
MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION-POLICE DEPT
MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION-POLICE DEPT
MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION-POLICE DEPT
MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION-POLICE DEPT
MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION-POLICE DEPT
RACQUETBALLS-COMMUNITY CENTER
WINE
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
SERVICE
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
WINE
GRINDER PART-PARK MAINTENANCE
CAB FOR JOHN DEERE TRACTOR-STREET DEPT
MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION
SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDITION
SERVICE-CHAIN ON LAKES STORM SEWER
SERVICE-COUNTY ROAD 4 TO MITCHELL ROAD
SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDITION
- CLEANING SUPPLIES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
-ADJUSTED DOORS/PISTONS/SEALS/BUSHINGS/
-LINKS/BOTTOM CAPS-POLICE BLDG/SHAFT
COUPLER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
CASSETTE TAPES-POLICE DEPT
-REKEYED 5 CYLINDERS/KEYS/REPAIRED LOCK-
SENIOR CENTER
BOND PAYMENT
-FIRE HYDRANT MARKING POSTS-WATER DEPT/
SIGNS-STREET DEPT
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-BALLOONS/HELIUM TANK & VALVE-SPECIAL
EVENTS-COMMUNITY CENTER
-REMOVE & REBUILD DOOR CLOSURES/INSTALL
LOCKS/LOCK/BOLT/KEYS-POLICE BUILDING
6 KEYS TO THE CITY-AWARDS
-MOPS/DUSTERS-LIQUOR STORE/AIR FRESHENER
SERVICE-CITY HALL -
-SERVICE-ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY-TH 169 TO
-MITCHELL/TRAFFIC STUDY/DELL ROAD/EVENER
-WAY FEASIBILITY/COLUMBINE RD FEASIBILITY/
VALLEY VIEW ROAD TO COUNTY RD 4
-BATTERIES-WINDSHIELD WASHER FLUID/ANTI-
FREEZE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE _
41058 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO
'059 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE INC
.1060 HOPKINS POSTMASTER
41061 HOPKINS POSTMASTER
41062 SUPPLEE'S 7 HI ENTERPRISES INC
41063 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SA
41064 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SA
41065 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SA
41066 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SA
41067 MINNESOTA DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
41068 R P M DISTRIBUTORS
41069 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO
41070 EAGLE WINE CO
41071 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC
41072 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
41073 MINNEGASCO
41074 PAUSTIS & SONS CO
41075 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
41076 PRIOR WINE CO
41077 QUALITY WINE CO
41078 THE WINE CO
41079 MILWAUKEE TOOL
41080 DEHN TRACTOR & CAB SERVICE
41081 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
41082 BARBAROSSA & SONS INC
41083 RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK
"1 084 SHAFER CONTRACTING COMPANY INC
( )85 SHAW LUNDQUIST ASSOC INC
41086 ACE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS INC
41087 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC
41088 AIRLIFT DOORS INC
41089 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO
41090 ALL KEY LOCK & KEY
41091 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK
41092 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC
41093 JERRY ANDERSON
41094 ANDON INC
41095 ARMOR SECURITY INC
41096 AWARDS OF AMERICA
41097 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO
41098 B R W INC
41099 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC
69344532
475.82
210.33
1296.94
35.09
4535.71
668.73
795.69
623.07
668.73
714.69
140.74
1.00
143.31
6367.46
6999.96
12768.40
37.50
3384.98
299.26
4560.43
36.78
11.00
2350.00
13.25
135068.15
120123.09
32199.20
63718.40
79.50
1326.38
464.36
51.70
97.20
283185.74
1173.30
146.00
27.70
246.23
124.00
30.38
7951.76
293.36
472A
MARCH 15,1988
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
MILEAGE/EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
REFUND-WATER & SEWER BILL
SERVICE-APPRAISAL OF WELTER CONDEMNATION
SEWER PIPE-SEWER DEPT
-SAND-SNOW & ICE CONTROL/GRAVEL-STREET
MAINTENANCE
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
MARCH 88 COPIER RENTAL-FIRE DEPT
SALT-SNOW & ICE CONTROL
-FAN/BOLT/GASKET/HOSES/THERMOSTAT
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE-SENIOR CENTER
OIL-FORESTRY DEPT
1 YEAR LEASE-WATER DEPT
-REPAIR CAR DIFFERENTIAL-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
FEBRUARY 88 SALES TAX
FEBRUARY 88 FUEL TAX
-SERVICE-5 & MITCHELL/5 8 COUNTY RD 4/
HIGHWAY 5 IMPROVEMENTS
ENTERTAINMENT-SENIOR PROGRAM/FEES PAID
PRINTER RIBBON-POLICE DEPT
COMPUTER TRAINING-FIRE DEPT
PRINTER RIBBON-POLICE DEPT
PRINTING FORMS-ENGINEERING DEPT
SCHOOL/MILEAGE/EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
SUPPLIES-ENGINEERING DEPT
FEBRUARY 88 INSURANCE CONSULTANT
REPORT-POLICE DEPT
TERRY CLOTHS-WATER DEPT
SERVICE
-KEY STAND/KEY BLANKS/DRILL BITS-
EQUIPMENT MAINTEUNCE
2 AIR CumPRESSORS KITS-FIRE DEPT
QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT
-CORNER GUARD/CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT
POLICE BUILDING
FLOOR DISPLAY-GRILL HOUSE
SERVICE-MARCH 88
FEBRUARY 88 EXPENSES
-LEGAL SERVICE-GENERAL OBLIGATION WATER
AND SEWER BOND
EXPENSES-CITY HALL
-PRINTING-PUBLIC INFORMATION/EXPENSE:-
• CITY MANAGER
FINAL PAYMENT-MTED ENERGY GRANT
PUMP REPAIR/EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
FILM PROCESSING/PRINTS-POLICE DEPT
FILM PROCESSING/FILM/PRINTS-WATER DEPT
SHARE OF HOCKEY GATE RECEIPTS-ICE ARENA
JANUARY 88 EXPENSES
-SHELF/TACKBOARD/WALL HANGER STRIP.,- ENGINEERING DEPT/PLANNING DEPT
CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT
270.00
24.91
57.94
110.00
112.88
2556.52
108.00
182.75
1772.85
112.58
50.00
13.20
180.00
55.00
14187.46
300.22
169392.66
60.00
46.94
120.00
253.31
981.66
61.64
71.14
455.00
7.00
110.30
52.60
179.21
1170.78
4981.20
466.87
775.00
49.50
211.00
3600.00
66.38
312.43
1400.00
160.74
44.92
25.47
515.12
35.00
475.35
1060.00
1100 KELLY BAUER
,1101 ANNETTE BEACH
41102 PATTY COLLINS BEADLE
41103 BJORKLUND CARUFEL LACHENMAYER INC
41104 BOYUM EQUIPMENT INC
41105 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC
41106 NATE D'BUCK
41107 BUSINESS CREDIT LEASING INC
41108 CARGILL SALT DIVISION
41109 CASE POWER & EQUIPMENT
41110 CENTRAIRE INC
41111 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS
41112 C & N W TRANSP CO
41113 CLUTCH & U-JOINT BURNSVILLE INC
41114 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
41115 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
41116 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
41117 COMPAS
41118 COMPUTER PLACE
41119 COMPUTER KNOW HOW
41120 COMPUTERWARE DATA PRODUCTS INC
A1121 CONCEPT MICROFILM INC
122 JOYCE CONLEY
41123 COPY EQUIPMENT INC
41124 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS INC
41125 CREDIT BUREAU OF MPLS/ST PAUL
41126 CLEVELAND COTTON PRODUCTS
41127 CULLIGAN
41128 CURTIS INDUSTRIES
41129 CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS INC
41130 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY
41131 DALCO
41132 DAVID 1CYNE CONSTRUCTION INC
41133 DECORATIVE DESIGNS
41134 EUGENE DIETZ
41135 DORSEY & WHITNEY
41136 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU
41137 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
41138 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
41139 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPT
41140 E P PHOTO
41141 E P PHOTO
41142 EDINA HIGH SCHOOL
'43 CHRIS ENGER
44 FACILITY SYSTEMS INC
41145 FEED RITE CONTROLS INC
20723553
4728
MARCH 15,1988
146 FEIST BLANCHARD CO -HANDLE/THREADED ROD/DRAG CONNECTOR LINK/
-HOSES/BELTS/HOSE CONNECTORS/STRIP CRIMPER
-MULTI-TESTER/LEADER KITS/POST CLEANER
-BEARINGS/REAR VIEW MIRRORS/SUPERGLUE/
-CLUTCH DISC/CLUTCH ASSEMBLY/TIE ROD
ASSEMBLY & SOCKETS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
41147 FITNESS ASSOCIATES INC STRESS TESTS 41148 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
41149 FOX MCCUE & MURPHY 1987 AUDIT SERVICE 41150 G & K SERVICES TOWELS/COVERALLS-WATER DEPT/PARK DEPT
41151 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC -RADIO REPAIR-FIRE DEPT/EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
41152 GETTING TO KNOW YOU ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORE 41153 GME CONSULTANTS INC SERVICE-PRAIRIE VIEW DRIVE
41154 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE CONSULTATION FEE-STRATEGIC PLANNING 41155 ROBERT R GRANT BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 41156 ALAN GRAY FEBRUARY 88 EXPENSES 41157 GROSS OFFICE SUPPLY OFFICE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT/POLICE DEPT 41158 LEROY GUBA HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 41159 H & H INDUSTRIES INC BALLAST-LIQUOR STORE
41160 CHRIS HAGE BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 41161 JIM HATCH SALES CO -BOLTS/WRENCHES/KEYS/BULBS/BOLT PROTECTORS
WATER DEPT
41162 HAUENSTEIN & BURMEISTER HYDRAULIC DOOR CLOSER-STARING LAKE PARK
41163 LAURIE HELLING -DRYBOARD/PENCILS-SPECIAL EVENTS-
PICTIONARY & PIZZA PARTY
164 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER -SERVICE-FILING FEE-PLANNING DEPT/
-MICROFICHE-ENGINEERING DEPT/ASSESSING
DEPT/FORESTRY DEPT 41165 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER WASTE DISPOSAL-FORESTRY DEPT
41166 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT -REPLACED CABLES/BELT LOOPS/CONTROL CABLES
FIRE DEPT 41167 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT JANUARY 88 BOOKING FEE 41168 ALLENE HOOKUM -SUPPLIES/PRINTINGcHISTORICAL & CULTURAL
COMMISSION 41169 IBM CORPORATION MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 88-POLICE DEPT 41170 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 27 -AUDITORIUM RENTAL-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL
-COMMISSION/JANITORIAL SERVICE & BLDG
-MAINTENANCE-FAMILY CENTER/CLEANING
SUPPLIES-PUBLIC WORKS BLDG & PARK BLDG 41171 INDUS-TOOL OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
41172 INTERNAL MEDICINE OF MINNEAPOLIS MEDICAL REPORT-POLICE DEPT
41173 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC -FEBRUARY 88 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/CITY
HALL/SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT/POLICE DEPT
41174 ISS INTERNATIONAL SERVICE SYS INC -MARCH 88 JANITORIAL SERVICE/MAINTENANCE
SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
41175 J & R RADIATOR CORP RADIATOR REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
41176 RICHAEL W JACQUES MILEAGE-LIQUOR STORE
4 :177 3 P4 OrPTCE PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT/FIRE DEPT
41178 JEAN JOHNSON MILEAGE
41179 KAY JOHNSON EXERCISE INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
80 JUSTUS LUMBER CO -TIMBERS/PLYWOOD/SCREWS/NUTS/STYROFOAM/
-TAPE/DRY WALL-FIRE DEPT/POLICE DEPT/
COMMUNITY CENTER/PARK MAINTENANCE
41181 K FACTOR -INSULATE EXHAUST SYSTEM ON GAtmeNGINE-
WATER DEPT
2308399 472C
1069.98
90.00
316.47
6000.00
354.12
1218.70
66.00
861.84
3621.20
532.00
200.00
196.21
139.00
49.48
122.00
39.66
102.88
14.82
802.05
225.00
237.50
179.75
60.39
1219.00
2057.05
188.50
15.00
199.34
1316.44
-96.48
11.25
269.91
16.00
288.00
322.97
585.00
41182 KILLMER ELECTRIC CO INC
41183 MARY KOTTKE
I/ 1 184 LA HASS MFG & SALES INC
LANCE
41186 CINDY LANENBERG
41187 JOHN A LE ROY CO
LIONS TAP 41188
41189 LIONS TAP
41190 LOGIS
41191 MIKE LONGMAN
LYMAN LUMBER CO 41192
41193 MOHAWK BUSINESS RECORD STORAGE
41194 MUNICI-PALS ASSOCIATION
41195 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC
41196 MARSHALL & SWIFT
41197 MIKE MARUSHIN
41198 MASYS CORPORATION
41199
41200
41201
41202
41203
41204
41205
41206 f !07
VOID OUT CHECK
MATTS AUTO SERVICE INC
MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC
MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC
MCNEILUS STEEL INC
METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION
MID CENTRAL INC
JON MILLER
MINNEAPOLIS AREA CHAPTER
41208 MEDICINE LAKE LINES
41209 METRO PRINTING INC
41210 MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT
41211 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION
41212 MINN COMM
41213 MINNESOTA CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
41214 MINNESOTA DAILY
41215 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC
41216 MODERN TIRE CO
41217 MOTOROLA INC
41218 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
41219 MY CHEESE SHOP
41220 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN
41221 W E NEAL SLATE CO
41222 MARY NELSON DISTRIBUTING INC
41223 BETH NILSSON
41224 NIGHTINGALE CONANT CORPORATION
41225 JOHN R NORD
26 J P NOREX INC
REPAIR LITES-CITY WEST PARKWAY
VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
CRANE REPAIR-SEWER DEPT
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
UNIFORM-FIRE DEPT
NUTS & BOLTS-WATER DEPT
REFUND-BROOMBALL DEPOSIT
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
1988 CLASS 2 SERVICE
FEE-STATE BROOMBALL TOURNAMENT
-PLYWOOD/TIMBERS-STREET MAINTENANCE/
HOMEWARD HILLS PARK
DOCUMENT STORAGE BOXES-POLICE DEPT
DUES-CITY HALL
BRAKE SHOES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
SUBSCRIPTION-ASSESSING DEPT
-MAGNET/DRILL BIT INDEX-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
-2 COMPUTERS/3 PRINTERS/INSTALLATION-
POLICE DEPT
TOWING-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EXPENSES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
METAL SHELVES-POOL-COMMUNITY CENTER
FEBRUARY 88 SAC CHARGES
AIR LIFT BAGS-FIRE DEPT
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-EQUIPMENT RENTAL-POOL LESSONS-COMMUNITY
CENTER
BUS SERVICE-ADULT PROGRAMS/FEES PAID
PRINTING FORMS/BADGES-POLICE DEPT
SUPPLIES-ENGINEERING DEPT
DUES-POLICE DEPT
MARCH 88 PAGER SERVICE-FIRE DEPT
-EXTINQUISHERS/BRA5S VALVES/0 RINGS/
-HELMETS/SCOTCHLITE LETTERS/UNIFORM-
FIRE & POLICE BUILDINGS/FIRE DEPT
EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER
-EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER/
ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORE
TIRES/TUBES-FORESTRY DEPT
-RADIO REPAIR/INSTALLATION OF RADIOS-
FIRE DEPT/POLICE DEPT
CARBURETOR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE •
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
EMPLOYMENT ADS
TABLE-GRILL HOUSE
-DRIVE SHAFT/PIONION SHAFT/NUTS/CROSS
SHAFT/SPROCKET-PARK MAINTENANCE
SKATING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
TRAINING SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
SERVICE-WATER MAIN REPAIR-8225 -HIAWATHA
92.50
82.50
96.62
39.65
33.00
28.50
100.00
37.52
7970.00
165.00
703.25
46.25
5.00
252.00
89.00
44.00
8250.00
0.00
173.00
125.46
77.49
202.14
79957.35
2390.00
112.00
10.00
180.00
432.00
18.00
30.00
45.00
1461.75
25.65
800.48
2310.70
1966.64
130.00
19.45
171.99
270.00
381.39
2816.00
32.95
70.00
2420.31
11466454 t
4720
41259 CORY SMITH
41260 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP
REPAIRED WIRING FOR FURNACE-FAMILY CENTER 115.05 BOND PAYMENT 39800.71
-SERVICE-WELTER PURGATORY ACRES 2ND 249.55
ADDITION
-COMPUTER/ACCESSORIES/SOFTWARE=$2491.05- 6492.85
-WATER DEPT/COMPUTER/MONITOR/SOFTWARE=
-$1859.80-HUMAN RESOURCES/PR1NTER=$374.00-
-ENGINEERING DEPT/PR1NTER=$381.00-
-COMMUNITY CENTER/MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-
CITY HALL
WATER TESTS-WATER DEPT 50.00
4 PHONE PAGERS-POLICE DEPT 828.22
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 66.00
TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT-GENERAL SERVICES 33.92
BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 7.00
-DESK/CHAIR=$660.50-SENIOR CENTER/ 949.50
PARTITION PARTS=$289.00-POLICE DEPT
FEBRUARY 88 EXPENSES 181.00
-DEVELOPER-COMMUNITY CENTER/2ND QUARTER 88 336.15
POSTAGE METER RENTAL-CITY HALL
-FILM PROCESSING-ASSESSING DEPT/FORESTRY 19.66
DEPT
4 SQUAD CARS 44237.00
MILEAGE 10.00
-PAINT PENS/FUSES/WASHERS/NOZZLE/ 75.33 CONNECTORS/CLAMPS/BATTERIES-FIRE DEPT
AS ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORE 100.00
-EXTENSION PLUG/HEADPHONE/ADAPTOR/TAPES/ 81.41 -CABLE/PLATE/PROGRAMABLE TIMER-CITY HALL/
POLICE DEPT
OIL SEAL/SLEEVE/GASKET-WATER DEPT 43.41
CASH REGISTER TAPE-LIQUOR STORE 49.27 MAPS-ENGINEERING DEPT 42.54
REFUND-WATER & SEWER BILL 72.42 -REBUILT TRIP CYLINDER/REPLACED HYDRAULIC 814.28
CYLINDER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
2 RESCUE KITS-FIRE DEPT 854.32 -MOTOR/ROTOR SHAFT/BEARINGS/BRUSHES/ 763.59 -STARTERS/ALTERNATOR/REPAIR OF ALTERNATOR-
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
REFUND-GAS FITTER LICENSE 15.00 -LUBRICANTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/PARK 265.10 MAINTENANCE
CLEANING SUPPLIES-POLICE BUILDING 60.05 LICENSE-STREET DEPT 30.00 JANUARY 88 EXPENSES 200.00 -SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER LITIGATION/FIRE 9086.70 STATIONS 3 & 4
-GEARS/SEALS/TRAY/BRACKET/BOLTS/SPRING/ 1326.30 -COVER/LEVER/PIN/BRAKE RELEASE SWITCH/
-HEAT RISER VALVE/CABLE/REPLACED INTAKE
-GASKET & CARBURETOR/ADJUSTED IIMER-
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID . 94.00
-TRAY/SPINNER/SOCKET/CHAIN WREMN/FLARE 98.85 SET-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
MARCH 15,1988
11 227 NORTHWESTERN SERVICE INC
1228 NORWEST BANK MPLS NA
41229 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
41230 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC
41231 PACE LABORATORIES INC
41232 PAGENET
41233 BRIAN PEARSON
41234 PERSONNEL POOL
41235 JOEL D PETERSON
41236 THE PINK COMPANIES
41237 PATRICIA PIDCOCK
41238 PITNEY BOWES INC
41239 PHOTON INC
41240 POLAR CHEVROLET & MAZDA
41241 JOYCE PROVO
41242 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
243 PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL MERCHANTS
41244 RADIO SHACK
41245 RELIANCE ELECTRIC
41246 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS OF MN
41247 JIM RICHARDSON
41248 JAMES RIPKA
41249 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CO
41250 ROAD RESCUE INC
41251 ROGER'S SERVICE
41252 ROTO ROOTER SERVICES
41253 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP
41254 SANCO INC
41255 DALE SCHMIDT
41256 KEVIN W SCHMIEG
41257 SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM INC
41258 SHAKOPEE FORD INC
10744898 472E
41261 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORE 243.20 41262 SQUARE CUT -REMOVED & REPLACED DOOR HANGERS-POLICE
80.45 BUILDING ,1263 SUPPLEE ENTERPRISES INC
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 9.60 41264 STATE TREASURER FEBRUARY 88 BUILDING SURCHARGE
5042.95 41265 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ -GUN BELT/GUN
H
O
L
S
T
E
R
/
C
U
F
F
H
O
L
D
E
R
/
C
U
F
F
S
/
414.45 -MACE HOLDER/BATON & HOLDER/KEY HOLDER/
-AUTO DOOR LOCK OPENER/LAMP-POLICE DEPT/
FEDERAL SIGNAL MOUNT KIT-FIRE DEPT 41266 E A SWEEN CO REFUND FOR WATER BILLS-SALES TAX EXEMPTION
511.06 41267 TENNESSEE CHEMICAL CO CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT 4590.98 41268 TODD COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKER & CAMERA SYSTEM-COMMUNITY CENTER
5024.57 41269 TRIGG INDUSTRIES INC ROAD TUBE GRIPS-ENGINEERING DEPT
61.57 41270 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM-FIRE DEPT 79.90 41271 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT 3186.72 41272 UNITED LABORATORIES INC
CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 254.56 41273 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC -PLOW BOLT/WASHERS/NUTS/SCREWS-EQUIPMENT
171.30 MAINTENANCE 41274 UNIVERSAL BATTERIES-SEWER DEPT 36.40 41275 VAUGHN DISPLAY FLAG POLE ROPE-CITY HALL 27.00 41276 VESSCO INC OIL SEAL KIT-WATER DEPT 91.34 41277 VIKING BUSINESS INTERIORS INC
ANGLE POSTS/SHELF CLIPS-PUBLIC WORKS BLDG
20.70 41278 VICOM INC TELEPHONE WIRE REPAIR-PUBLIC WORKS DEPT
5.25 41279 DON WENDLING PORTABLE RADIOS & BATTERIES 1182.00 41280 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP CO
-SLIDING BRACKET/FLANGE/CLAMP/WASHER-SEWER
288.45 DEPT 41281 WATSON FORSBERG CO SERVICE-FIRE STATION #3 & 4 66218.00 A1282 SANDRA F WERTS MILEAGE 31.23 !83 WILSON TANNER GRAPHICS -NEWSLETTER/LETTERHEAD/ENVELOPES-HUMAN
440.00 RESOURCES/POLICE DEPT/CITY HALL 41284 KEN WORDE HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 229.00 41285 XEROX CORPORATION JANUARY 88 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-FIRE DEPT
94.00 41286 LACKS INC -GARBAGE CANS-PARK MAINTENANCE/CLEANING
377.67 -SUPPLIES/BROOM/SPRAY PUMP/PLIERS-
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 41287 JIM ZALESKY VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 189.00 41288 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FIRST AID SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 74.40 41289 KAY ZUCCARO AQUA AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
165.00 41290 PRISCILLA JEAN DICKSON
REFUND-PROPERTY TAX ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
328.50 41291 MARGARET A PERRY
REFUND-PROPERTY TAX ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
328.50 41292 KEVIN R ROBERTS REFUND-PROPERTY TAX ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
328.39 41293 CAROL M WEBER REFUND-PROPERTY TAX ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
273.78 39637 VOID OUT CHECK
975.00- 40574 VOID OUT CHECK
166.95- 40719 VOID OUT CHECK
5.00- 40799 VOID OUT CHECK
894.15- 40812 VOID OUT CHECK
13.25- 40837 VOID OUT CHECK
613.10- 40845 VOID OUT CHECK
18083.00- 40851 VOID OUT CHECK
335.45- 40861 VOID OUT CHECK
258.52- 40876 VOID OUT CHECK
8.75- 40892 VOID OUT CHECK
561.96- 15 VOID OUT CHECK
- 448.58-
6803621 .
472F
MARCH 15,1988
11 1994 VOID OUT CHECK
1064 VOID OUT CHECK
-100652 210.83-
795.69-
$1363649.56
472G
DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS
10 GENERAL
11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT
15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M
17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE
31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP
33 UTILITY BOND FUND
39 86 FIRE STATION CONSTRUCT
43 77 FIRE DEBT FUND
44 UTILITY DEBT FUND
45 UTILITY DEBT FD ARB
51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD
52 IMPROVEMENT DEBT FUND
57 ROAD IMPROVEMENT CONST FD
73 WATER FUND
77 SEWER FUND
81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND
87 CDBG FUND
91 T I F DEBT FUND
$1363649.56
177542.60
63799.51
49471.70
33767.96
4575.70
202386.55
71402.81
15668.70
307225.20
192.54
330311.01
11.51
204.45
35740.59
80600.48
2306.21
-12705.63
1147.67
Mb.
Vte 472H
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
City Manager Carl J. Jullie
Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson
Uniform Contract
March 8, 1988
01>
In 1985 the City began a uniform rental and cleaning program for employees
in the Street Maintenance, Park Maintenance, and Water Departments pursuant
to the local addendum to the labor agreement with IUOE No. 49. This
benefit was also extended to members of the Engineering and Building
Inspections Departments who spend much of their time out-of-doors. The
number of employees covered under the program has grown from 45 to 53.
As a good competitive business practice, bids were advertised in February
for the uniform service. Charges were made in the uniform specifications
to provide for comfortable clothing. Bids were opened on February 18. The
tabulation below shows the annual cost for a two-year contract based on 53
employees participating in the program:
Alt. 1 Alt. 2
nn••
American Linen $14,655.03 $16,639.35
Aratex Services 14,744.60 15,984.80
Unitog 15,158.00 16,536.00
G&K 16,536.00 18,189.60
Leef Bros. 17,087.20 17,500.60
The difference between Alternates 1 and 2 is that Alternate 1 provides
polyester/cotton blend pants, and Alternate 2 provides 100 percent cotton
paints. Employees would have the choice of which pants to wear.
After evaluating the bids, the most responsible value to the City comes
from the bid submitted by American Linen Supply Company. The weekly per
employee cost is les5-than that under the contract with Unitog.
Recommendation: It is recommended that a two-year contract for employee
uniform rental be awarded with American Linen Supply in accordance with the
bid it submitted.
CWD:CJJ:jdp
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
City Manager Carl J. Jullie
Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson
Financing Options for a New City Hall
March 8, 1988
Council met on January 13, 1988 to begin planning for a new city hall. It
established a March 1993 target date for occupancy. It asked the Residents
Advisory Committee on City Administrative Offices to evaluate a city hall
site in the downtown concept area. The Committee subsequently recommended
that such a site be pursued because it was equally acceptable to the other
three sites identified for acquisition. Council also directed staff to
prepare several scenarios on financing the project.
A myriad of options exists to pay for a new city hall, its attendant
facilities and equipment, and land. Given the 1993 target date, a great
deal of uncertainty enters into any estimates of future cost. For purposes
of illustration, it is assumed that the cost for city hall is $5 million,
and that increases in costs over time can be ignored (that is, the rise in
construction costs equals the rate of interest, and that the ability to pay
increases at the same rate as inflation). Straightforward examples will be
presented rather than speculation about what may happen as a result of
negotiations. If anything, the examples should present maximum amounts for
which the City would be obligated. Data for assessed valuation and mill
rates also assume the property classification rules in effect in 1988.
While these rates will change in the range of 55 percent in 1989, they — are shown in present terms for familiarity.
The Old Reliable G.O. Bond: Long-term general obligation bonds are the
safest instruments because they carry the full faith and credit of the
City. Use of these bonds would have to be approved by referendum in 1990
or very early 1991 due to the two-year lead time necessary for design and
construction. Referendum is necessary, in the City Attorney's opinion,
because of statutory limitations of five years to pay off bonds without
referenda.
Assuming that $5 million in bonds were sold for a period of 20 years with a
net interest cost of 7.00 percent, the annual payment would be $472,500.
(Each $1 million borrowed costs $94,500 annually.) Assuming that the tax
base,which stands at $398 million for payable 1988, were to grow $40
million annually, the mill levy impact would range from 0.9 mill on a $520
million tax base in 1991 to 0.37 mills on a $1.28 billion tax base in 2010.
The bond repayment schedule could be structured to have an average mill
rate of 0.60 to 0.65" throughout the 20 years. Total principal and interest
payments would total $9,450,000.
Certificates of Participation: This is a long-term instrument which goes
by several names (e.g., annual appropriation lease financing, tax-exempt
lease-purchase financing) and has been used successfully by several
municipalities. Use of these certificates does not require referendum.
An additional element of risk is presented tO bondholders, but conditions
in the financing agreement would make it unlikely for the City not to
maintain its obligations throughout the term of the transaction.
Consequently the rate of interest for these certificates is slightly higher
than that on a G.O. bond. This difference is currently in the 0.20 percent
- 2 -
range, but has been as high as 1.0 percent. If one were to assume a full
percentage point higher rate of interest, the cost increases $7,400 per $1
million borrowed, or $37,000 per year over the cost shown for G.O. bonds.
Obligations would be $509,500 per year, and $10,190,000 over the life of
the certificates.
Pay-As-You-Go: The Residents Advisory Committee recommended a somewhat new
approach for a capital City project: a pay-as-you-go method which would
establish a special purpose "building fund." This technique would require
payment of all cost obligations by 1997. Some funds would be raised prior
to occupancy in 1993, and the balance of funds needed would be borrowed in
1992 and repaid within five years.
The plan proposed by the Committee would have started a 0.6-mill levy
payable in 1988, and continuation from 1993 to 1997 of the 1992 rent for
current leased space. Because Council did not adopt this levy this year,
this plan is estimated to yield $4,265,000. Annual obligations would rise
from $264,000 in 1988 to $336,000 in 1992, and then jump from $565,000 in
1993 to $661,000 in 1997. An additional $735,000 needs to be structured
into this payment schedule.
Mix-and-Match: Council suggested that a building fund be established
through 1992, and that other financing mechanisms be employed for the
balance of project costs.
Under the plan recommended by the Committee, an $865,000 nest egg can be
raised through 1991 with a 0.6-mill levy. With a referendum-approved G.O.
bond issuance for $4.2 million for 20 years at 7.0 percent interest,
obligations would be $397,000 annually and $7,940,000 over the life of the
bonds. The total cost of this approach, $8,800,000, saves $650,000
compared to the cost of the "pure" G.O., bond issue of $5 million. Mill
rate impacts would range from 0.71 mills in 1992 to 0.30 in 2011. The
bond repayment schedule could be structured to have a 0.5 mill annual levy
for each of the 20 years.
If the $4.2 million balance were paid through certificates of participation
having an 8 percent rate of interest over 20 years, obligations would be
$428,000 annually and $8.56 million over the life of the certificates.
(Total cost would be $9.4 million in certificates and building fund
monies.) These figures compare with the $510,000 annual and $10,200,000
total obligations without the initial building fund contribution. Mill
levies would range from 0.76 in 1992 to 0.32 in 2011. The bond repayment
schedule could be structured to have an annual levy in the range of 0.5 to
0.55 mills throughout the 20-year life of the bonds. It appears that use
of certificates would be the necessary back-up mechanism if a referendum
failed.
Internal Borrowing: One tool available for an immediate, major expense for
such an opportunity as the purchase of land is internal borrowing. For
discussion purposes, assume that the land cost is $1 million. This amount
could be "borrowed" from the General Fund reserve, and repaid over a short
period of time (and with interest, if necessary) in a manner so as not to
endanger the City's bond rating. If this borrowing period were five years,
then an additional $200,000+ would need to be raised each year. Another
source of funds is the balance in the trunk water and sewer special
assessment fund. This fund could be repaid with interest on a schedule
which would maintain the ability of the fund to meet its annual obligation.
Another possibility requires a change in policy and some risk: use of
liquce store profits. These returns currently go back into liquor
operations and to park improvements. Money should be set a ,;44:1e, however,
for construction of a liquor store.
- 3 -
If such internal borrowing were to occur, the repayment requirement would
essentially begin the building fund plan. Similarly, if land were secured
under a contract-for-deed arrangement (which would not require internal
borrowing), the payment schedule would also resemble the building fund
plan.
Other Creative Financing: The financial industry has a long history of
creating new financing tools and developing variations on tried-and-true
financing methods. Given that three or four years will pass for the
industry, Congress, and the Legislature to shape the financial environment
before the City would make its financing decision, other methods for
payment will not be studied in this memorandum.
What if City Hall Goes Downtown?: Much of the discussion for City Hall has
focused on the downtown concept area. Thoughts of economy as part of the
development process have been expressed. These advantages accrue from land
use decisions and the possibility of a lease-purchase arrangement.
The Committee recommended that the City Hall site ideally be eight acres,
and not less than five acres in size. The larger size allows for optimal
flexibility in configuring the building, parking, and outside public space.
Through such a process as a planned unit development (PUD), perhaps an acre
could be pared from the site requirement through shared parking (about 75
spaces of the 200 required for a 40,000 square-foot building). Some of the
public space desirable in a downtown could be adjacent to the City Hall.
The City could accept land in lieu of cash park fees, but given the
$4.00/square foot price of land in the area, only one acre could be
procured if the development were an 80-acre project. Through the
development apaproval process, the City could be able to lessen its site
size requirement by two to three acres. This savings would bring the land
cost closer to that of the other recommended sites. Additional savings
might be realized if the City's presence as an anchor to downtown
development is considered important.
If a lease-purchase arrangement were possible for the building, use of
certificates of participation would be preferable. If the City were to
participate in a private mortgage, it would probably pay a 3 to 4 percent
higher rate of interest.
The City could also consider use of a City Development District for the
downtown concept area. Use of increments to acquire a site and build a
city hall is not an eligible activity, however.
SUMMARY: The options outlined in this memorandum do more than scratch the
surface for identifying realistic financing opportunities available to the
City. A plethora of additional possibilities may surface before Council
decides to embark upon the construction process. These combinations can be
examined with more certainty as the time for that final decision nears. In
an effort to keep issues easily understood, the examples presented have
been simple, in constant 1987 dollars, and made conservative economic
_ assumptions.
The attached table summarizes the scenarios contained in this memorandum.
CWD:jdp
Attachment
FINANCING A $5 MILLION CITY HALL METHOD 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 2010 2011 TOTAL 20-Yr. G.O. @ 7.01 473 473 473 473 473 473 473 473 $ 9,450,000 Mill Levy .9 .84 .79 .74 .7 .66 .62 .37 .60-.65yr 20-Yr. CofP @ 8.01 510 510 510 510 510 510 510 510 $10,190,000 Mill Levy .97 .9 .84 .79 .74 .7 .66 .4 .65-.70yr Bldg. Fund 264 288 312 336 565 589 613 637 661 $ 4,265,000 & Rent Cont. Mill Levy .6 .6 .6 .6 .94 .92 .9 .88 .86 , Bldg. Fund & 20-Yr. G.O. @ 7.01 264 288 316 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 397 $ 8,800,000 Mill Levy .6 .6 .6 .71 .66 .62 .58 .55 .52 .31 .3 .50yr Bldg. Fund & 264 288 312 428 428 428 428 428 428 428 428 $ 9,400,000 29-Yr. CofP 6 8.01 .50-.55yr Mi/1 Levy .6 .6 .6 .76 .71 .67 .63 .59 .56 .33 .32 Internal Borrowing 215 215 215 215 215 $ 1,075,000 Mill Levy .49 .45 .41 .37 .33 Assumptions: 1) 1987 constant dollars 2) Uniform annual installments 3! Tax base grows $40 milliOn/yr 4) Dollars expressed in thousands, 1989-2011
Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area
300 Metro Square Building, 7th and Robert Streets
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Tel. 612 291-6359/TDD 291-0904
DATE: February 29, 1988
TO: I-494 Project Management Team
FROM: Connie Kozlak
SUBJECT: I-494 EIS Agreement
Attached is a copy of an interagency agreement prepared by Mn/DOT's Consultant
Agreement section for participating in the 1-494 EIS. Mn/DOT's lawyers have
not yet approved it. This is a preliminary draft for your review and
discussion. Please have the appropriate staff (legal or otherwise) from your
agency review it so you come prepared for discussion on March 9.
One thing I would like to make clear - the 10% of cost shown for the
Metropolitan Council is the pass-through amount from Improve I-494. Since
Mn/DOT believes it cannot accept money from private sources, the Council would
accept the money and pass it through to Mn/DOT. Legal staff at Mn/DOT and the
Council are still checking on this.
AGN494.PETRN1@5
Hennepin County Agreement No.
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT NO.
AGENCY AGREEMENT FOR
HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION STUDY
AMOUNT SNCUMB.
Agreement between
The State of Minnesota,
Department of Transportation, the
Metropolitan Airports Commission, the
Metropolitan Council, Hennepin County
the City of Bloomington
the City of Eden Prairie, the City of
Richfield, the City of Edina and the
City of Minnetonka
Re: Preparation of the EIS for the
1-494 Corridor Project
None
Receivable
INDEX
Parties to the Agreement
Explanation and Justification
Section 1.0 - Scope of Work and Method of Study
Section 2.0 - Duration of Agreement
Section 3.0 - Compensation
Section 4.0 - Composition of the Board
Signatures
-1-
PAGE
2
2
3
7
7
8
LP')
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota/
Department of Transportation, the Metropolitan Airports Commission, the
Metropolitan Council, Hennepin County, the City of Bloomington, the City of
Eden Prairie, the City of Richfield, the City of Edina, and the City of
Minnetonka, hereinafter referred to as the "Agencies".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS the Metropolitan Council did produce a Corridor Study for 1-494 in
the area of the above referenced Agencies, and
WHEREAS it has been determined by the parties hereto that the project
development process be continued by conducting the Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for 1-494 from the Minnesota River to the 1-394
Interchange, and
WHEREAS the general objective in preparing the EIS is to help resolve
uncertainty about ultimate roadway design, allow advanced rights-of-way
acquisition consistant with Federal requirements, and position projects in
the corridor described above to be ready to use funds when they are
available, and
WHEREAS it has been determined that all of the said Agencies are a part of
or have a specific interest in the stated area, and
-2-
WHEREAS the said Agencies will all benefit from the results of the EIS and
are all willing to share proportionately in the cost of the preparation and
completion of the EIS, and
WHEREAS it is the expressed interest of said Agencies to participate and
cooperate in the preparation and completion of the said EIS, and
WHEREAS all of the said Agencies are authorized by Minnesota Statute 471.59
to enter into agreements providing for the exercise of powers shared in
common.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.0 - SCOPE OF WORK
1.10 The Environmental Impact Statement and preliminary design shall
be performed under the direction of the Minnesota Department of
Transportation, in consultation and cooperation with the Project
Advisory Board, who will act in an advisory role.
1.20 The Minnesota Department of Transportation will act as the
contracting agent for engaging the sevices of an engineering
consultant to conduct the EIS work.
1.30 The Consultant Selection Committee will pre-qualify at least
three consultant firms and recommend the selection of one of the
firms to the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of
Transportation for his approval.
-3-
Ti I
The Consultant Selection Committee will be made up of the
following:
Minnesota Department of Transportation ( 2 votes)
Metropolitan Airports Commission (1 vote)
Metropolitan Council (1 vote)
Regional Transit Board (1 vote)
Hennepin County (I vote)
City of Bloomington (1 vote)
City of Eden Prairie (1 vote)
City of Richfield (1 vote)
City of Edina (1 vote)
City of Minnetonka (I vote)
1.40 In accomplishment of this work, recognition will be given to and
compliance made with the requirements of the following laws,
regulations and guidelines related to location, public hearings,
environment and public lands. These standards, regulations or
guidelines shall be considered as minimum. Higher standards
shall be used where it is feasible and economically sound to do
S O.
1.41 Minnesota Statutes 161.171-161.177 inclusive (Municipal
Approval).
-4-
1.42 U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration
Federal-Aid Program Manuals, including:
Book III, Volume 6, Chapter 2, Section 1, Subsection 1 (Design
Standards for Federal-Aid Projects)
Book V, Volume 7, Chapter 6, Section 3 (Landscape and Roadside
Development)
Book V, Volume 7, Chapter 7, Section 2 (Environmental Impact and
Related Statements)
Book V, Volume 7, Chapter 7, Section 3 (Noise Standards and
Procedures)
Book V, Volume 7, Chapter 7, Section 5, (Public Hearings and
Location/Design Approval)
Book V, Volume 7, Chapter 7, Section 9 (Air Quality guidelines)
1.43 National Environmental Policy Act.
1.44 Section 4(f) of Public Law 89-670.
1.45 Minnesota Statutes, Section 1160.01 et.seq. (Environmental Policy
Act of 1973).--
-5-
1.46 State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, Highway P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Development Process.
1.47 I-494 Corridor Study report.
1.48 Minnesota Statute 473.181 (Metropolitan Council Approval).
1.60 The Agencies, acting through their Project Advisory Board
representatives, shall at all times during the terms of this
agreement be afforded the opportunity for review of the work
being performed. The Agencies shall also be able to obtain
copies of reports, studies and data compiled for the studies
without additional cost. It is understood that the Project
Advisory Board will act in an advisory role only.
1.70 The Agencies shall furnish to the consultant any information
o
r
data they may have which is pertinent to the studies without
separate compensation therefor or any adjustment of any Agen
c
y
'
s
share of the cost.
1.80
The ownership of all data collected or developed for the E
I
S
shall be vested with the Minnesota Department of Transporta
t
i
o
n
,
subject to the right of all Agency participants to secure a
c
c
e
s
s
to and receive a copy of all such data. Each Agency shall
b
e
entitled to ten (10) copies of all Reports and Environmenta
l
Statements developed for the project and upon request, a co
p
y
o
f
-6-
(4q
all other data collected or prepared in connection with the work.
Credit shall be given to each participating agency in each
report.
1.90 Any individual agency may terminate its involvement in this
agreement contingent upon 30 days notice to all other
participating agencies and the payment of its share of the costs
incurred to the date of termination.
SECTION 2.0 - DURATION OF AGREEMENT
2.10 This agreement will remain in full force and effect until
completion and approval of the EIS by the Agencies and the
Federal Highway Administration. Individual completion dates for
reports prepared during the process shall be determined by mutual
agreement of the participating agencies.
SECTION 3.0 - COMPENSATION
3.10 Te Minnesota Department of Transportation shall enter into a
contract with a consultant firm selected by the Consultant
Selection Committee and approved by the Commissioner of the
Department of Transportation for the EIS and preliminary design.
3.20 Notice of final execution of the consultant agreements shall be
given to each agency within seven (7) days.
-7-
3.30
The amount of the matching funds shall be shared by the Agen
c
i
e
s
in the proportions listed hereafter:
3.31 Agency Percent of Cost Up to
Minnesota Department of Transportation 50.00% $650,000.00 Metropolitan Council 10.00% $130,000.00 Metropolitan Airports Commission 5.00% $ 65,000.00 Hennepin County 10.00% $130,000.00 City of Bloomington 11.00% $143,000.00 City of Eden Prairie 5.00% $ 65,000.00 City of Edina 4.00% $ 52,000.00 City of Richfield 3.00% $ 39,000.00 City of Minnetonka 2.00% $ 26,000.00
100.00% $1,300,000.00
3.42 The Minnesota Department of Transportation will invoice the
participating agencies from time to time as the work of the
Consultant progresses. The agencies will make payment with
i
n
3
0
days of receipt of said invoice.
SECTION 4.0 — COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD
4.10 The Project Advisory Board shall be composed of representat
i
v
e
s
of each of these Agencies:
Federal Highway Administration
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Metropolitan Council
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Regional Transit Board
Hennepin County
—8—
City of Bloomington
City of Eden Prairie
City of Edina
City of Richfield
City of Minnetonka
IMPROVE 494 Group
As well as any other organized group deemed necessary. Each
agency/group shall inform the Department of Transportation by
letter who its representative will be on the Project Advisory
Board.
4.20 The Project Advisory may create a technical committee to advise
it on matters of a technical nature relating to the EIS. Said
technical committee shall consist of members of the engineering,
planning and related staff of the Agencies.
-9-
1)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have duly executed this agreement by
their proper officers and representatives.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Metropolitan Council
Department of Administration By
By
Title
Date
As to form and execution by the By
Attorney General:
Date
Title
By
Date
Department of Finance
By
Date
Metropolitan Airports Commission
By
Date_
Title
By
Department of Transportation Date
By
Title
Date
Title
-10-
Date_
q 7
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Attest:
Deputy County Auditor
Date
Upon proper execution, this
agreement will be legally valid
and binding and upond ate of
approval is in compliance with
all laws relating to the subject
matter hereto.
By
Chairman County Board
Date
Recommended for approval:
Deputy County Kdministrator
Date
Assistant County Attorney
Date
Director of Public Works and
County Engineer
Approved as to execution
Assistant County Attorney
Date
—
Date
CITY OF MINNETONKA
By Date
Mayor
By Date
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
By
Date
Mayor
By
Date
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By
Date .
Mayor
By
Date
CITY OF EDINA
By
Date
Mayor
By
Date
CITY OF RICHFIELD
By Date
Mayor
By Date
-12-
gat)
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
March 9, 1988
Request Authorization to Initiate the Second Phase of the
Repairs to the Eden Prairie Community Center
In 1987, the City authorized the first phase of the repair to the Eden Prairie
Community Center. That first phase included removing the exterior concrete
block wall around the natatorium and replacing that wall with a brick exterior
wall, and constructing a second brick wall around the racquetball courts.
Staff recommended a two phase construction project for two major reasons 1)
Staff wanted the existing block wall that was falling down around the
natatorium replaced as soon as possible, and was hopeful of having it complete
prior to the first of the year. 2) Staff also wanted to complete the repair of
the racquetball court wall in order to get racquetball court #3 usable as soon
as possible. As construction projects generally go, this project took
approximately two months longer than originally projected and is just now
nearing completion.
Staff had hoped that the arbitration process would be completed by this time
and the City Council would know the amount of money awarded in the settlement
prior to initiating the second phase construction. The arbitration process
could drag out through much of 1988; therefore, staff recommends the City
Council initiate the second phase construction at this time.
Wally Daniels, Project Manager from Setter, Leach and Lindstrom, provides the
following project schedule: Design Development - 3 weeks, Construction
Documents - 5 weeks, Bidding - 4 weeks, Construction - 22 weeks.
If this project is authorized at this time, it is nearly nine months until
completion and the project could then anticipate some winter construction;
therefore, it is prudent to initiate the process as soon as possible.
The architectual fees for design development, construction documents, bidding,
and two site visits per week of construction inspection is $80,000. The
estimated construction cost for this project is $400,000.
Staff would also recommend the City Council consider authorizing this contract
to include improving the entry plaza to the Community Center. The existing
entry does not conform to pedestrian patterns and is a constant maintenance
problem and visual eyesore. The revised entry would remove some of the berms
and provide more direct pedestrian access to the facility from the parking
lot.
The Community Services Staff recommend !nding this project through cash park
fees that will be reimbursed to a limited extent from the litigation
settlement.
I.
t;)
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Com
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Driector of Community Servic
e
s
March 1, 1988
Staring Lake Park Improvements
Each year Staring Lake Park receives more
a
n
d
m
o
r
e
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
w
i
n
t
e
r
,
as well as during the summer months. In 19
8
6
,
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
e
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
the lower parking lot (adjacent to the fis
h
i
n
g
p
i
e
r
)
t
o
h
a
n
d
l
e
o
v
e
r
f
l
o
w
parking from the main lot; however, there c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
s
t
o
b
e
m
a
n
y
o
c
c
a
s
i
o
n
s
e
a
c
h
year when people are parking along Coun
t
y
R
o
a
d
1
,
a
s
a
l
l
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
s
a
r
e
filled.
Staring Lake Park is the largest "passive a
r
e
a
p
a
r
k
i
n
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
n
d
presently includes over four miles of h
a
r
d
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
t
r
a
i
l
s
,
a
p
a
r
k
s
h
e
l
t
e
r
w
i
t
h
restrooms, indoor and outdoor fireplace,
t
w
o
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
,
b
a
s
k
e
t
b
a
l
l
c
o
u
r
t
,
two horseshoe courts, volleyball court
,
s
o
f
t
b
a
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
,
a
s
l
i
d
i
n
g
h
i
l
l
,
skating track, many secluded picnic areas
,
a
n
d
o
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
f
i
n
e
s
t
p
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
sites in the State. Other facilities locate
d
w
i
t
h
i
n
S
t
a
r
i
n
g
L
a
k
e
P
a
r
k
include: the Cummins-Grill Historic Sit
e
,
t
w
o
a
d
u
l
t
s
o
f
t
b
a
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
s
,
t
h
e
Outdoor Center, the existing fishing pier
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
M
i
t
c
h
e
l
l
R
o
a
d
,
a
n
d
a
public boat launch.
In 1988, the City received a grant from th
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
t
o
install a new fishing pier at the point ad
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
O
u
t
d
o
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
.
T
h
i
s
fishing pier will have a handicapped trai
l
a
c
c
e
s
s
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
b
e
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
the early part of the summer.
In 1987, the Performing Arts Committee,
o
f
t
h
e
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
a
n
d
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
Commission, recommended that the City de
v
e
l
o
p
a
n
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
a
m
p
h
i
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
t
o
accommodate concerts in the park at Stari
n
g
L
a
k
e
P
a
r
k
.
T
h
e
c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
f
e
l
t
that Staring Lake Park with its beautiful vi
e
w
s
a
n
d
m
o
r
e
p
a
s
s
i
v
e
n
a
t
u
r
e
w
o
u
l
d
be an ideal location for concerts in the p
a
r
k
,
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
p
l
a
y
s
,
e
t
c
.
In early 1988, the Eden Prairie Lioness Clu
b
v
o
t
e
d
t
o
d
o
n
a
t
e
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
t
o
w
a
r
d
the Staring Lake Park Amphitheater. The L
i
o
n
e
s
s
C
l
u
b
w
o
u
l
d
l
i
k
e
t
o
r
e
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
the City over a 3-5 year period for this p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
Community Services Staff, at this time, reco
m
m
e
n
d
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
m
a
j
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
to Staring Lake Park in order to accommo
d
a
t
e
t
h
e
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
i
s
facility. Staff recommends the City doub
l
e
t
h
e
s
i
z
e
o
f
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
t
o
accommodate an additional 60 cars; this wo
u
l
d
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
--ballfield further to the east. Staff also re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
i
n
g
t
h
e
amphitheater stage and to construct seati
n
g
i
n
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
h
i
l
l
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
use of grading and retaining walls. Locati
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
a
m
p
h
i
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
a
n
d
t
h
i
s
type of seating would complement the exi
s
t
i
n
g
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
f
i
t
t
i
n
g
this facility into the existing topography.
Staff would also recommend replacing the existi
n
g
e
n
t
r
y
t
o
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
a
larger plaza that would accommodate the traffic
p
a
t
t
e
r
n
s
t
o
a
n
d
f
r
o
m
t
h
a
t
building.
The estimated cost to complete these projects i
s
$
9
5
,
0
0
0
.
S
t
a
f
f
w
o
u
l
d
recommend the use of cash park fees for this pro
j
e
c
t
.
BL:mdd
EDEN PRAIRIE LIONS
P.O. BOX 443-005
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344
REPLY TO: EDEN PRAIRIE LIONESS
c/o Marilyn Lieb, President
9391 Creekwood Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
February 23, 1988
Mr. Bob Lambert
Director of Community Services
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
SUBJECT: Staring Lake Park Amphitheater
Dear Bob:
The Eden Prairie Lioness Club recently voted to donate $15,000 toward a
major project and as you know the Staring Lake Park Amphitheater was
chosen to be the recipient of these funds.
According to your memo of October 21, 1987 to Pat Breitenstein of our
club, the Community Services Staff will recommend the Council front-end
the cost of the development and accept reimbursement at whatever rate
the Lioness Club could handle. It is our intention to meet the $15,000
financial obligation within three years, or no longer than five years. Please
take whatever steps are necessary to obtain Council approval of this
project.
The Lioness members are very excited about this project and the oppor-
tunity to provide a gift to the residents of Eden Prairie Who have been so
supportive of our fund-raisers over the years.
If additional information about the club is needed for publicity purposes, or
clarification of this long range commitment, please contact me at 941-1754.
Yours truly,
Marilyn Lieb
goLi
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Service
s
March 9, 1988
Recommendation on Operation Policies for R
i
l
e
y
L
a
k
e
P
a
r
k
On March 7th, the Parks, Recreation and Na
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
the February 10th memo on Riley Lake Ac
c
e
s
s
.
T
h
e
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
a
t
length the problems associated with the
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
c
h
a
n
g
e
t
o
k
e
e
p
t
h
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
open after the parking lot is filled.
Don Sarles, President of the Riley Lake Ho
m
e
o
w
n
e
r
'
s
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
,
s
p
o
k
e
a
b
o
u
t
the Riley Lake homeowner's concerns over
u
n
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
h
a
t
l
a
k
e
a
n
d
reminded the Commission of the dangerous
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
n
t
h
a
t
l
a
k
e
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
limiting the access.
Commission member Karon Joyer indicated t
h
a
t
s
h
e
a
n
d
h
e
r
c
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
u
s
e
d
t
h
a
t
park on almost a daily basis last summer, a
n
d
w
a
s
v
e
r
y
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
o
v
e
r
t
h
e
l
a
c
k
of respect the park users had for the park
a
t
t
e
n
d
a
n
t
a
n
d
t
h
e
l
i
f
e
g
u
a
r
d
.
M
o
s
t
requests by the park attendant and the lif
e
g
u
a
r
d
w
e
r
e
s
i
m
p
l
y
i
g
n
o
r
e
d
b
y
m
a
n
y
of the young people using the park.
Commission members expressed a concern ov
e
r
t
h
e
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
f
o
r
development of a City park where many of
t
h
e
u
s
e
r
s
i
g
n
o
r
e
d
p
a
r
k
r
u
l
e
s
a
n
d
where City residents are discouraged from
u
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
d
u
e
t
o
t
h
e
n
a
t
u
r
e
o
f
the activity in that park.
Lambert explained the pros and cons of the
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
t
o
p
a
s
s
a
n
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
h
a
t
would not allow mooring or beaching
o
f
b
o
a
t
s
o
n
p
a
r
k
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
,
a
n
d
n
o
unattended boats at the dock adjacent to t
h
e
l
a
u
n
c
k
.
Commission. members asked what impact el
i
m
i
n
a
t
i
n
g
a
l
c
o
h
o
l
i
n
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
,
m
i
g
h
t
have on activities in the park. Lambert
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
d
t
h
a
t
i
t
m
i
g
h
t
h
a
v
e
s
o
m
e
impact; however, he would anticipate that
t
h
e
a
l
c
o
h
o
l
w
o
u
l
d
s
i
m
p
l
y
m
o
v
e
t
o
t
h
e
boats.
Shaw then moved to recommend the City Co
u
n
c
i
l
p
a
s
s
a
n
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
h
a
t
w
o
u
l
d
eliminate the use of alcohol in Riley La
k
e
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
t
h
e
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
m
o
o
r
o
r
beach boats on parkland in Riley Lake Pa
r
k
.
M
o
t
i
o
n
w
a
s
s
e
c
o
n
d
e
d
b
y
B
a
k
e
r
a
n
d
passed unanimously. Cook requested a repor
t
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
s
t
a
f
f
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
f
a
l
l
o
f
1988 to determine the impact of these r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
.
.
.
.
-
Don Sarles indicated, that as preside
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
R
i
l
e
y
L
a
k
e
H
o
m
e
o
w
n
e
r
'
s
—Association, he supports the recommendatio
n
m
a
d
e
b
y
t
h
e
P
a
r
k
s
,
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
Natural Resources Commission.
If the City Council concurs with this reco
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
,
s
t
a
f
f
w
o
u
l
d
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
t
h
e
City Attorney to draft an ordinance for f
i
r
s
t
r
e
a
d
i
n
g
a
t
t
h
e
A
p
r
i
l
5
t
h
C
i
t
y
Council meeting.
BL:md
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
THRU:
Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM:
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Servic
e
s
-
-
'
DATE:
February 10, 1988
SUBJECT: Riley Lake Access
Attached is a letter from Del Barber, Region
V
I
T
r
a
i
l
s
a
n
d
W
a
t
e
r
w
a
y
s
Coordinator for the Department of Natural Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
.
I
n
h
i
s
l
e
t
t
e
r
,
M
r
.
Barber notes that the City of Eden Prairie ha
s
b
e
e
n
v
i
o
l
a
t
i
n
g
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
Natural Resources policy and a May 31, 1985 a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
n
d
t
h
e
DNR by closing the Riley Lake access after 20
t
r
a
i
l
e
r
e
d
b
o
a
t
s
h
a
v
e
l
a
u
n
c
h
e
d
.
"The DNR considers it a discriminating ramp w
h
e
n
e
v
e
r
t
h
e
r
a
m
p
i
s
c
l
o
s
e
d
,
a
n
d
yet the riparian landowners have open use to
t
h
e
l
a
k
e
.
"
Prior to limiting our access to 20 boats, the
C
i
t
y
w
o
u
l
d
o
f
t
e
n
r
e
c
o
r
d
o
v
e
r
4
0
boats launched in a single afternoon on that
l
a
k
e
,
t
h
e
m
a
j
o
r
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
b
o
a
t
s
were of the speed boat variety. These over
c
r
o
w
d
e
d
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
m
a
d
e
t
h
e
l
a
k
e
basically unusable for anyone interested in
a
s
a
f
e
,
e
n
j
o
y
a
b
l
e
b
o
a
t
i
n
g
experience. Upon changing the rules to cont
i
n
u
e
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
b
o
a
t
s
t
o
l
a
u
n
c
h
,
City staff would recommend the Council cons
i
d
e
r
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
s
t
e
p
s
t
h
a
t
m
i
g
h
t
b
e
taken to discourage over use of Riley Lake:
1. Staff would recommend the City Council autho
r
i
z
e
e
x
t
e
n
d
i
n
g
n
o
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
"
signs along County Road 1, Riley Lake Road a
n
d
C
r
e
s
t
w
o
o
d
T
e
r
r
a
c
e
,
u
p
t
o
one mile from the access.
2. Staff would also recommend not allowing any
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
p
u
l
l
i
n
g
b
o
a
t
t
r
a
i
l
e
r
s
to park in the overflow parking area (in the
p
a
s
t
t
r
a
i
l
e
r
e
d
b
o
a
t
s
t
h
a
t
were waiting to launch could park in this are
a
)
.
If it is still the goal of the City to discou
r
a
g
e
'
a
c
c
e
s
s
a
f
t
e
r
2
0
b
o
a
t
s
,
obviously., this parking lot would have to be
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
t
o
c
a
r
s
o
n
l
y
.
Hopefully, these two changes will discourage
l
a
u
n
c
h
i
n
g
t
o
o
m
a
n
y
m
o
r
e
b
o
a
t
s
than the number permitted in the past; howev
e
r
,
i
f
t
h
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
s
t
o
allow well over a safe number of boats, staff
w
o
u
l
d
t
h
e
n
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
d
o
p
t
i
n
g
a
park rule that would not allow boats to moor
o
n
p
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
.
T
h
i
s
c
o
u
l
d
b
e
m
o
s
t
effectively controlled through the expansion
o
f
t
h
e
s
w
i
m
m
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
a
l
o
n
g
p
a
r
k
-
property and extending a rope and buoy system
t
h
e
e
n
t
i
r
e
l
e
n
g
t
h
o
f
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
property to discourage much of the type of us
e
t
h
a
t
e
x
i
s
t
s
a
t
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
t
o
date, which is mainly young people partying o
n
s
h
o
r
e
a
n
d
o
c
a
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
l
y
w
a
t
e
r
skiing on the lake.
--These changes would alter the use of the pa
r
k
t
o
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
p
i
c
n
i
c
k
i
n
g
a
n
d
swimming more than boaters. There would pr
o
b
a
b
l
y
b
e
a
l
a
r
g
e
r
t
u
r
n
o
v
e
r
o
f
users on the lake as boats would have to re
m
a
i
n
o
n
t
h
e
l
a
k
e
a
n
d
w
o
u
l
d
o
n
l
y
b
e
able to pick up or drop off passengers at
t
h
e
d
o
c
k
.
W
i
t
h
n
o
m
o
o
r
i
n
g
o
f
b
o
a
t
s
,
the positive aspects to that type of change
w
o
u
l
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
:
(10(0
1. A larger number of boaters would probably get to use the lake, as the stay
on the lake for water skiers would be a shorter duration if they are not
able to park their boats.
2. It would be a much more attractive place for families as the majority of
the users of that park are presently non Eden Prairie residents, and tend
to be large groups of young people from surrounding communities.
The other side of the coin is that although the majority of the users of this
park are non Eden Prairie residents, there are many Eden Prairie residents
that do enjoy using Riley Lake and the park under the existing conditions. It
is one of the few park areas adjacent to a lake where mooring of boats and the
use of alcohol is allowed; therefore, there would be some opposition to any
changes that would restrict this type of use.
Staff will also be reviewing the possibility of designating Riley Lake Park as
one of the parks where alcohol is not allowed. This regulation might also go
a long way toward curbing some of the past problems where park users have
become quite violent due to their inability to get on the lake.
With the new development that is being approved for the southwest shore of
Riley Lake in Chanhassen, there will be additional use of the lake by
residents on or near the lake. Eventually, it is very likely that the City of
Eden Prairie would recommend a surface management ordinance to control either
speed or horsepower on this lake. As this lake is located in both Carver and
Hennepin County, the County Boards of both counties would have to approve any
surface management ordinance prior to DNR approval.
City staff will be reviewing this change with the Parks, Recreation and
Natural Resources Commission at their March 7th meeting and will notify the
President of the Riley Lake Homeowner's Association of these changes and the
proposed discussion at the March 7th Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
Commission meeting. Staff will submit recommendations from the Commisssion on
any possible changes to the operation of Riley Lake to the City Council at the
March 15th Council meeting.
BL:mdd
I MEMORANDUM
TO:
TN RU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services TM ---
March 9, 1988
Department Name Change
At the March 7th meeting, the Parks, Recreation and
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Commission reviewed the attached February 18th memo.
T
h
e
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
w
a
s
concerned that the title "Parks and Recreation" did not a
d
d
r
e
s
s
a
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
portion of the responsibilities of the department; na
m
e
l
y
,
d
e
a
l
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
natural resources.
By unanimous vote the Commission recommended the Cit
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
renaming the Community Services Department the Department
o
f
P
a
r
k
s
,
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
and Natural Resources.
BL:mdd
..n
quY
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
February 18, 18, 1988
Department Name Change
In 1970, the City formed the Parks and Recreation Department and hired a
Director of Parks and Recreation. As the City expanded, additional
responsibilities were assigned to that department. Some of those additional
responsibilities included: the Historical & Cultural Commission and related
programs and services, the Human Rights & Services Commission and related
programs and services, initially the Liquor Store, and in the late 1970's the
Community Education program was initiated through the Community Services
Department and, in fact, the Community Education Coordinator reported to the
Director of Parks and Recreation. The City Manager, at that time, suggested
that the title "Parks and Recreation Department" was not a broaa enough title
to cover the span of responsibilities of the department and suggested a name
change to Community Services Department.
Over the years, as the City hired additional staff and other departments were
formed, these responsibilities were transferred to other departments.
Attached is an organizational chart that depicts the existing organizational
structure of the Community Services Department.
In the late 1970's, the School District made a commitment to community
education and developed the Community Educational Services Department under
the School District. Since that time, there has been considerable confusion
between the two departments - Community Services Department from the City and
Community Educational Services Department from the School District. This
confusion, has increased, especially since both departments provide similar
types of services and, in fact, jointly sponsor a program brochure.
The name "Community Services Department" really does not define the purpose of
this department as well as the title "Department of Parks and Recreation".
The more traditional title "Parks and Recreation Department" is much less
confusing with the Community Educational Services Department and is a title in
which most people can identify the general purpose of the department.
City staff will be suggesting the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
Commission consider this name change at the March 21st Commission meeting and
will forward the Commission's recommendation to the City Council on April 5th.
BL:mdd
c+-
C c'YkOWAII:t' 5bri-LthA-Ar G t {t4-1k SeArliftCeS es CCM' `2/1 • NEDiStxrit 0 13(4...kirez • rkh.4,t1s We,es.e • St.,..) "Fircy.44,4 4TY.E.e • $01}d catte 1?, • tea:C.) Re-cycli Sesnly-0,....1/4ac4 .14P16.•...1.41 Q„...01.141 ° FtoccirW bkF , • Tvo-iI5 rR);itvois Scle. iL(....i,uttw- • "Racy to-440 .ATIJA EsiittA4i..1 't • • T14&it.e./J210,7 &At- et.A.-se • See Aveme./1:1.1(-PeAA 1,0“-se, /06.)1,-..re 0.44-cw- • o 44-6 v- Sh:ore e...445 &AS
IN,storical I, Cultural Commission( (mayor City Council City imager (Department of Par, 11 Recreation( Director of FOrks and Recreation H-1 s-t.r, I (Parts, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission( Athletics Promotion Adult Recreation Senior ServiceS !list & Cultural Park Mai tenence trail Maintenance Part Shelter Paint Senior C nter Main( Outdoor enter Paint Historic Site Paint System Planning Master Planning Prodect Planning Program Support Site Plan Review Park Dew Inspect Site Plan Review Grants AdminiStra., Commonity Center Op Community Center 'Saint Concessions Marina Operations ea, facility Res forestry Tree Disease Conrtrol Nursery Operations Weed Control Water Quality Mgt. Environmental Planning_ Tooth Pecreatin Spetlal Events Superintendent of Recreation F (Paciltty Operations( E Design( 173=231 no P.T. Accept Rec Sup It Rec Sup II Rec Sap II P.T. Offlciala Official, Supervisors Plaint lech II Saint Tech I Office Coord Sec/Recept Part Time Staff lAdaptlre RetreRtiRml Ill Rec Sup (contract) Environmental1 Services Manager Supt of Pork Maint ronmental Service Eroperty Management Park Meintenince COMM., ty Center Operations, Superv I sor Part Planner P. T. Tree Inspectors Part Foreman Part Malnt I-1, Seasinal Part Maintenance Seasonal Staff Supervisors leaders Instructors Rec Sap I , WSI'S ••Guards Attendants Supervisors initninte rt Rental Contracts Land Purchase Property accords clog Repair Contracts Construction Contracts Cemetery Mgt.