HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 02/02/1988AGENDA
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 1988
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia
Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to
the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director
John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris
Enger, Director of Community Services
Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works
Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary
Sue Anderson
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
A. Special City Council meeting held Tuesday, December 1 1987 Page 244
B. Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, December 15 1987 Page 249
C. Special City Council meeting held Wednesday, January 13 1988 Page 264
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 9-88 amending City Code Sec. 2.05 Page 19
Subd. 3 Relating to the Payment for Attendance of Meetings by
the Mayor and Council
B 2nd Reading of Ordinance #1-88 Amending City Code Chapter 2, Page 30
Section 2.11, Subdivisions 3 and 4 Which Set the Time Period for
Council Review and Citizen Appeal for Board of Appeal Actions.
C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance #2-88 Amending City Code Chapter 1, Page 31
Section 7.01 Which Updates Reference to 1987 State Traffic Law.
D. 2nd Reading of Ordinance #3-88, Amending City Code Chapter 12, Page 32
Section 12.03 Subdivision 17 Which Updates the Definition of
Subdivision, and Section 12.40 which Deletes Old Language on Types
of Subdivisions for Which City Can Require Parkland Dedication.
E. Clerk's License List Page 267
F. SOUTHGATE by William Smith. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 61-87, Page 270
Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 2.29 acres for
Southgate Addition; Approval of Developer's Agreement for
Southgate Addition; and Adoption of Resolution No. 88-28,
Authorizing Sumary of Ordinance No. 61-87 and Ordering Publication
of Said Summary. 2.29 acres into single family residential.
Location: North of St. Andrew Drive and west of Baker Road.
(Ordinance No. 61-87 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 88-28 - Authorizing
Summary of Publication)
City Council Agenda 2 - Tues.,February 2, 1988
G. Final Plat Approval for Welter's Purgatory Acres 3rd Addition,
flocated west of Bennett Place and south of Olympia Drive)
Resolution No. 88-24
Page 277
H. Final Plat Approval for Southgate (located west of Baker Road Page 280
and north of St. Andrew Drive) Resolution No. 88-25
I. Approve Land Surveyor's Certificate of Correction to Plat of Page 283
Hennepin County Highway Plat No. 6 Prepared by Hennepin County
Surveyor
J. Receive Feasibility Report for Golden Triangle Drive, Page 286
Improvement Contract No. 52-110 and set date for Public Hearing
(Resolution No. 88-20 --
K. Approval of Record of Decision Finding that Creekview Residential Page 287
Development does not have the Potential for Significant
Environmental Effects
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. AMOLUBE by Amoco Oil Company. Request for Planned Unit Development Pave 295
Concept Amendment on approximately 17 acres, Zoning District
Amendment within the Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District on
1.4 acres for construction of a quick lube facility. Location:
Southeast corner of Highway #169 and Anderson Lakes Parkway
(Resolution No. 88-29 - PUD Concept Amendment to National Child
Care MD Concept; Ordinance No. 10-88, Amending Ordinance No.
32-84-PUD-5-84 within the Neighborhood Commercial District)
B. PAX CHRISTI CATHOLIC CHURCH by Pax Christi Catholic Church. Page 301
Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 38
acres, Zoning District Amendment within the Public Zoning
District on 38 acres for construction of an addition. Location:
12100 Pioneer Trail. (Resolution No. 88-30 - Planned Unit
Development Concept Amendment to Pax Christi Catholic Church PUD
Concept; Ordinance No. 11-88 - Amending Ordinance No. 9-83 within
the Public District)
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A Request from Mr. McSwiggan Regarding Required Front Yard Setback Page 305
for Corner Lots
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
IX. APPOINTMENTS
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
Page 304
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,February 2, 1988
B. Report of City Manager
I. NSP Easement Agreement for New Powerline along T.H. 5
2. Strategic Planning Mission Statement
3. Request for additional funding to distribute Human Services
Directory
C. Report of City Attorney
D. Report of Director of Planning
E. Report of Director of Community Services
F. Report of Director of Public Works
G. Report of Finance Director
XI. NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Page 309
Page 311
Page 312
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 1987
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
6:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and
Patricia Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Asst.
to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson,
Director of Human Resources and
Services Natalie Swaggert, and
Recording Secretary Sue Anderson
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: All members were present.
I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 6:06 PM.
II. REPORT ON COMPARABLE WORTH
Natalie Swaggert, Director of Human Resources & Services,
presented the Comparable Worth Study Report for review and
approval of recommendations.
Part I, dealt with the purpose of the study and its
compliance with Minnesota Legislature Law of 1984, Chapter
651, requiring each political subdivision of the state to
establish equitable compensation relationships between
female-dominated, male-dominated and balanced classes of
employees. The law also requires that each subdivision
use a job evaluation system to determine comparable work
value.
Part II, Swaggert overviewed the Job Evaluation Method
Selection and the decision of 134 jurisdictions of the
Metropolitan Area Management Association (MAMA) to work
jointly on the study. Control Data Business Advisors was
selected to perform an analysis and evaluation of City
jobs. Business Advisors analyzed, evaluated and made
external market comparisons for 29 benchmark jobs. Job
analysis was performed using 6 occupational Analysis
Questionnaires. The analysis and evaluation study was
undertaken in a cooperative effort to comply with the
Minnesota Comparable Worth Act of 1984 by establishing
reasonable and equitable pay relationships between jobs in
the MAMA member cities' employment structures.
Special City Council Meeting 2 December 1, 1987
Bentley inquired about method of job analysis in determining content of position. Swaggert replied the
questionnaire provided a comprehensive list of possible
tasks and space for time spent on each task.
John Coskey, Arthur Young consultant, explained that the
system is an automated way of evaluating a job on time
spent, and that it is broad enough to customize a job.
Bentley inquired if the process is truly representative of
our situation here. Coskey replied the questions are so
detailed it accounts for 100% of time spent.
Pidcock asked if all employees took the questionnaires.
Swaggert answered no, in some cases only a representative
sample of each job was analyzed.
Anderson inquired if the City did not have job descriptions
already, could this information dovetail a job description.
Swaggert reported that the time spent profile had indeed
provided a state-of-the-art job description revised,
updated and very detailed.
Part III, covered development and communication of the
Comparable Worth Hierarchy which indicates grade and point
range, job title and class. After release of the results,
employees had thirty days to appeal. The City had 18
position appeals. Some were settled internally, and
several went on to the MAMA Committee.
Bentley asked if the reason for appeal was because the
employee felt the weighing was not accurate. Swaggert
replied that appeals were made for multiple reasons but
that many were submitted as system-weighing appeals.
Coskey pointed out that the strength of the system prevailed
and the jobs stand as they were originally analyzed. The
appeal process took four months. Swaggert reported that
appeals were by both female and male dominated positions.
The close range of the positions in the Comparable Worth
Point Comparison with other municipalities of our size was
noted.
Part IV, covered the Pay Equity Analysis, focused on
establishing a formal pay plan to properly administer pay
equity and related pay issues for all employees in the
future. In developing ranges so differences in one grade
and the next can be recognized, there is a 15% difference
in the mid points. Between grades 7 and 8 there is a 19%
difference. The extra 4% difference is to help relieve
the pay compression that results because the non-exempt
grade 7 is eligible for overtime and the grade 8 exempt
employee is not eligible for overtime.
Coskey continued that the analysis identified individuals
who require an adjustment to be considered equitably paid.
Overpaid positions will be individually reviewed and an
Special City Council Meeting 3 December 1, 1987
appropriate course of action will be developed. The
intent is to bring these positions in line with the new
ranges over a period of time.
Bentley asked how jobs covered by contract would be
adjusted. Swaggert felt this would be dealt with in the
bargaining process, and will get back to Council as
negotiations occur.
Pidcock asked for clarification of range spread being
greater at top management than in the lower skilled.
Swaggert responded that at the non-exempt levels, growth
is vertical (into the next grade). At the exempt level,
career growth is through the grade; as grade 10 and 11 are
department heads and only a few can be in those levels,
grade 9 is the end of the career for most employees
requiring a wider range of pay to satisfy more years of
employment in one range.
Mayor Peterson asked how the proposed policies compared
with private sector employment. Coskey stated private
sector data was integrated into the study. Salary data
from Honeywell, Dayton-Hudson, and Pillsbury was used.
Part V, Pay Equity Implementation, was summarized by
Swaggert. Adjustment to salary was necessary for one
female at $.42 and seven males at $7.18 total. Fourteen
female at $9.57 per hour and 12 male at $12.19 per hour.
The intent is to bring them into range gradually from this
point on. Besides these adjustments, they looked at each
individual job to see if, with regard to years in service,
they had progressed to mid-point. These adjustments are
listed in the report and the amount collectively to bring
them to midpoint which is $4.14/hour.
Recommendations to handle minimum pay equity for underpaid
positions are: 1) adjust all female salaries that are
below the range minimum to the range minimum; 2) adjust
all male salaries that are below the range minimum to the
range minimum; 3) provide additional adjustments to those
employees whose present salaries are at a lower level in
their salary range than is appropriate based on the length
of time in their present position; and 4) make the above
adjustments retroactive to August 1, 1987. This coincides
with the date established by the Minnesota State Legislature
after which a city could be subject to legal action for
possible Comparable Worth discrimination. Included in the
1987 Budget is an allocation of $30,000 for Comparable
Worth adjustments. The actual cost of the proposed
adjustments is $22,533.
The recommendations for overpaid adjustments for sworn
officer positions are: 1) complete a detailed salary
survey to determine Eden Prairie's competitive market
position. Monitor 1987-88 contract settlements for
Special City Council Meeting 4 December 1, 1987
impact of Comparable Worth on wage arbitration; and 2)
modify the Eden Prairie, January 1, 1989, sworn officer
salary structure to reflect changing market conditions
with the intent of remaining in a position of competitive
pay. A key goal must be established to retain our
department as a non-organized unit.
The recommendation for overpaid adjustments for public
works maintenance personnel is: Eden Prairie's employees
are covered by the Master Labor Agreement between
Metropolitan Area Management Association (MAMA) and the
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 49.
The City cannot directly impact the wages set by this
contract but have flexibility to establish salary steps
between the Maintenance I (Laborer) and Maintenance II
(Light Equipment Operator) classifications. A merit pay
step system should be researched and evaluated for
possible implementation by January 1, 1989.
The recommendation for overpaid adjustments for other
positions is: All other overpaid positions can be
resolved over a period of time through implementation of
the new salary administration program.
The recommendations for EXEMPT/NON-EXEMPT PAY COMPRESSION
are: 1) adopt a two-tier vacation plan that provides a
higher rate of vacation accrual to exempt employees. The
additional vacation would alleviate, through indirect
compensation, a pay compression problem between the non-
exempt and exempt salary levels. In addition it would
provide a partial replacement of lost earnings for
individuals whose positions were formerly treated as non-
exempt and are now classified as exempt under the new
salary structure; and off-set, to some extent, the large
number of hours required of Department Heads and other
exempt professionals in after-hours meetings; 2)
alternative solutions to this pay-compression problem
include adopting an exempt over-time policy or increasing
the salary levels for Grades 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12. Both
alternatives are expensive "direct compensation" solutions;
and 3) the revised Vacation Benefit program would be as
follows:
Regular Employee Status
2 weeks (10 days) 0 - 5 years
3 weeks (15 days) 6 - 14 years
4 weeks (20 days) 15 - years and over
Exempt Employee Status
3 weeks (15 days) 0 - 5 years
4 weeks (20 days) 6 - 14 years
5 weeks (25 days) 15 - years and over
Anderson stated the City had gone out of its way bringing
police pay in line with the market and asked if the study
results will have an effect on our Public Safety Department.
Special City Council Meeting 5 December 1, 1987
Jullie stated the City recognizes that it does not have an
organized police union and the pay adjustments will
maintain a competitive posture. If the market is that
much different, the City can create a separate salary
structure.
Anderson expressed concern that the City had been able to
have the "cream of the crop" for Public Safety because of
the salary, and that implementation of the comparable
worth study may negatively affect the salary the City
could offer.
Anderson asked if Staff had seen report and Peterson asked
if Staff was intended to view it. Swaggert responded that
Staff had seen hierarchy results, but not the recommendations
but would following the Councils approval.
Bentley requested data on the fiscal impact, out-of-pocket
costs, loss time and pay for vacation. Swaggert indicated
that that analysis was done and available.
Peterson indicated their was no more time to review
additional information.
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to accept the Comparable
Worth Study recommendations by Natalie Swaggert and John
Coskey from Arthur Young as presented this evening for pay
adjustments, and to adopt a two-tier vacation schedule as
proposed for exempt and non-exempt positions. Motion
carried unanimously.
Bentley thanked Staff for the tremendous job in completing
this report.
III. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson to adjourn
special meeting at 7:35 PM. Motion carried unanimously.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1987
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and
Patricia Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Asst.
to the City Manager Craig Dawson,
City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance
Director John D. Frane, Director of
Planning Chris Enger, Director of
Community Services Robert Lambert,
Director of Public Works Eugene A.
Dietz, and Recording Secretary Sue
Anderson.
ROLL CALL: Councilmember Harris was absent.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following items were added to the Agenda: VII.
Discussion of Lot Storage Petition; X.B.3. Update on Hwy. 5
Power Line; XI.1. Terex Loader Buy-Back; XI.2. Set Sepcial
Council meeting for December 22, 1987.
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley to approve the Agenda and
Other Items of Business, as published and amended. Motion
carried unanimously.
II. MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY NOVEMBER 17
1987
The following changes were made: page 3, paragraph 2, line 2-3 shall read: and should not be looked upon as a
recreational facility for an elite few; page 5, paragraph 1,
line 2, word 6 shall read: it is; page 5, paragraph 7, line
3-4 shall read: to Staff and Commission's Red Rock Interceptor
Summation Plans, which would include hard...; page 5, paragraph
13, line 4, word shall read: trail; page 6, paragraph 3, line 4, word 2 shall be deleted; page 6, paragraph 4, line 2 and 3-4
shall read: that is already a high traffic area ready for
development, and the roads shall be upgraded to handle it;
page 7, paragraph 6, line I shall read: MOTION: Anderson
moved, seconded by Bentley to approve 1st; page 11, paragraph
4 shall read: Anderson suggested that in operating as an
efficient Council, members could decide if they wish to grade
themselves; Rage 11, paragraph 6, line 1-3 shall read:
Bentley reported the 1976 Clean Air Act amended by Congress
contain a multitude of air contaminates and potential placing
of penalties on states that, in all ways, did not abide; page
11, paragraph 6, line 7 shall read: The impact of this is
there is the potential for total enforcement of prohibition
of; and page 11, paragraph 7, line 1, word 7 shall read: might.
City Council Minutes 2 December 15, 1987
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Minutes
of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, November 17, 1987,
as published and amended. Motion carried unanimously.
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Set Special City Council Meeting for Wednesday, January
13, 1988, 7:00 PM, to discuss Resident's Advisory
Committee on City Administrative Offices Final Report
C. Resolution No. 87-330, Accepting Transfer of Pleasant
Hill Cemetery from the Cemetery Association to the City
of Eden Prairie
D. MARRIOTT COURTYARD by Marriott Corporation. 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 54-87-PUD-14-87, Rezoning from C-
Regional to PUD-14-87-C-Reg-Ser on 4.2 acres; Approval of
Developer's Agreement for Marriott Courtyard; and
Adoption of Resolution No. 87-316, Approving Summary of
Ordinance No. 54-87-PUD-14-87, and Ordering Publication
of Said Summary. 13.94 acres into 3 lots for
construction of a 149-room hotel. Location: East of
U.S.Highway No. 169, north of 1-494, west of Prairie
Center Drive, south of Viking Drive. (Ordinance No. 54-
87-PUD-14-87 - Rezoning and PUD District; Resolution No.
87-316 - Authorizing Summary and Publication)
E. STARRWOOD, Cardarelle & Associates. 2nd Reading of
Ordinance No. 56-87, Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5;
Approval of Developer's Agreement for Starrwood Addition;
and Adoption of Resolution No. 87-323, Approving Summary
of Ordinance No. 56-87 and Ordering Publication of Said
Summary. 29.19 acres into 42 single family lots, 2
outlots, and road right-of-way. Location: North of
Research Road, east of Mitchell Road, southeast of McCoy
Lake. (Ordinance No. 56-87 - Rezoning; Resolution No.
87-323 - Authorizing Summary and Publication)
F. AMENDING CHAPTER 11 REGARDING MECHANICAL SCREENING. 2nd
Reading of Ordinance No. 58-87, Amending Chapter 11
Regarding Mechanical Equipment Screening
G. Final Plat approval for Lunds Center Addition (Located
south of Prairie Center Drive and east of Franlo Road)
Resolution No. 87-325
H. Final Plat Approval of Raven Wood (Located south of
Edenvale Boulevard and west of Raven Court) Resolution
No. 87-326
I. Change Order No. 2 Nemec Knolls, I.C. 52-272
J. Change Order No. 4 Valley View Road I.C. 51-272
City Council Minutes 3 December 15, 1987
K. Appointment of Fox McCue & Murphy as Auditors for Fiscal
Year 1987
L. Request Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District to
participate in review in drainage systems as a result of
the July 23 Storm (Resolution No. 87-329)
M. Authorize Preparation of a Feasibility Study to analyze
Utility and Roadway Improvements necessary to serve the
proposed 4th elementary school on the Harry Rogers
property (Resolution No. 87-331)
N. Final Approval of $20,900,000 Multi-Family Housing Bonds
for Fountain Place (CSM) (Resolution No. 87-332)
O. Amending the Indenture of Trust for Fountain Place (CSM)
(Resolution No. 87-333)
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve Items A-0 on
the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously.
IV. PUBLIC HEARING
A. SOUTHGATE by William Smith. Request for Zoning District
Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5, and Preliminary Plat of
2.29 acres into single family residential. Location:
North of St. Andrew Drive and west of Baker Road. (Ordinance
No. 61-87 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 87-324 - Preliminary Plat)
City Manager Jullie reported that notices of the public
hearing were sent to owners of surrounding properties and
published in the Eden Prairie News. The Planning Commission
heard this item in its November 23, 1987 meeting and
recommended approval on a unanimous vote subject to final
plat approval of 1) detailed storm water run-off, utility
and erosion control plans for review by City Engineer and
Watershed District; 2) prior to building permit issuance,
proponent shall pay the cash park fee, and notify City and
Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of any
grading; 3) and shall enter into a special assessment
agreement with the City for the upgrading of St. Andrew
Drive. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
Commission did not review this item.
Peter Knaeble, representing William Smith, stated proponent
seeks Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 and
Preliminary Plat of 2.29 acres into six single-family lots.
The property was located on the north side of St. Andrew Drive
between Baker Road and Prairie View Drive. He stated this
project would involve some grading for the construction of
building pads and roadway extension. Variances were not
required, and utilities connect onto St. Andrew Avenue.
Bentley inquired if the public street from St. Andrew Drive
was being put under contract for paving. Dietz responded
affirmatively, and noted that the first course of bituminous
had been installed.
City Council Minutes 4 December 15, 1987
MOTION 1:
Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to close the public
hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION 2:
Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to approve 1st Reading of
Ordinance No. 6-87 for Rezoning. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION 3:
Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to adopt Resolution No.
87-324 approving the Preliminary Plat. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION 4:
Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to direct Staff to
prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and
Staff recommendations and Council conditions that the road
through the subdivision would be extended in the future.
Motion carried unanimously.
B. 1987 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING (Resolution No. 87-329)
City Manager Jullie reported that this Public Hearing was
published in the Eden Prairie News and sent to the owner of
the affected property. The assessment roll consists of one
property in the LaVonne Industrial Park with a special
assessment due of $16,822.49.
Dietz reported that the Staff was convinced the discrepancy
was a computer error, but the error was discovered to be
human. A supplemental assessment in the LaVonne Industrial
Park for Lot 3, Block 2 for Franklin National Bank was made
in August 1983 to become payable in 1984. The work in 1983
was not completed and, therefore, could not be assessed and
the special hearing was delayed until 1984. In 1984, a
special assessment of $83,000 was levied with first
installment in 1985. In September of 1985, the developer
requested the balance due on this special assessment because
he was selling the property. City Staff then advised
Hennepin County funds were collected. After the audit turned
up an uncollected assessment, it was found the City had
entered the special assessment in 1983 showing first payment
in 1984, when actually the assessment was delayed to 1984
with first payment in 1985 leaving i balance of $16,822 due
in 1985.
Dietz stated the City can now collect the $16,822 assessed
against the property with payment over a three year period
from present property owner.
Pidcock inquired if present owners had been duly notified.
Dietz replied owner was notified and not very pleased.
Anderson motioned to close public hearing. Bentley requested
delaying the closing of this public hearing and give property
owner an opportunity to arrive and speak later in the
evening.
City Council Minutes 5 December 15, 1987
Mr. Matthews, property owner, stated he had a copy of the
original notification of final assessment. He expressed
concern that this was a burden to them and requested that at
11% interest perhaps the City would levy this over a five-
year period.
Council asked Staff if this was equitable and Dietz replied
affirmatively.
MOTION 1:
Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley to close the public
hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION 2:
Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley to adopt Resolution NO.
87-328 approving 1987 Special Assessment over five-year
period of time. Motion carried unanimously.
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Payment of
Claims Nos. 39150-39467. Roll call vote: Pidcock, Bentley,
Anderson, and Peterson voted "aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
VI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
A. Proposed Alarm Ordinance
City Manager Jullie reported that the number of false alarms to
which the Police Department must respond has grown out of
proportion. Responding to systems which owners should have in
proper working order results in less staff available to
respond to other emergencies. Surrounding communities have
found that adoption of an ordinance which sets a fee to be
charged after a certain number of false alarms an effective
means of controlling this abuse.
The City Attorney's office drafted a proposed ordinance
for false alarms. It stated that after three false alarms
per calendar year, there would be a fee charged assessed by
resolution of the City Council. Jullie stated the Police
Department recommends that the City adopt the graduated fee
schedule used by the City of St. Louis Park whereby user was
allowed three false alarms per calendar year uithout penalty;
a fee of $50 was charged for each false alarm in excess of
three; $100 per false alarm in excess of 10; and $150 per
alarm in excess of 15 false alarms per calendar year.
Jullie introduced Police Chief Keith Wall and directed
questions from Council to him.
Anderson inquired about charging a different fee if fire
trucks are called out for false alarms repeatedly at the same
property vs. the fee for patrol car false alarm. He also
inquired if Staff could investigate what surrounding cities
have for ordinances of this nature.
City Council Minutes 6 December 15, 1987
Jullie stated that the purpose was not to recover cost, but
to bring attention to this situation and defer some of the
cost in the process.
Bentley expressed his understanding of Anderson's request and
his agreement of Jullie's statement that the initial purpose
was to obtain the attention of the chronic abuser. On behalf
of public safety, the Council should adopt this ordinance.
Different fees for different service calls can be addressed
if necessary at a later date.
Mayor Peterson inquired about security companies and their
response. Wall responded that security companies requested
the City adopt this ordinance to encourage owners to be more
responsible for their systems.
Wall further stated that it would be less complicated in this
first year to have only one fee to deal with abusers. He
explained the reality that when officers are repeatedly
called to the same addressed for false alarms, they become
complacent when that location has an alarm.
Pidcock believed the fee should be levied after two false alarms.
Anderson believed the fee should be levied after four false alarms.
Jullie stated that the issue was to adopt an ordinance to
enact a user fee for false alarms, not setting the fee or the
minimum number of false alarms which would be addressed in
the annual Fee Resolution.
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson to approve 1st Reading of
Ordinance No. 62-87 which establishes the ability to set fees
for false alarms. Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Peterson directed Staff to return to Council with its
recommendations of fee schedule at a later meeting.
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion of Lot Storage Petition
City Manager Jullie reported the receipt of a petition signed
by sixty-two residents in the Topview Road area stating a
concern about the use of side lots for storage area. They
requested Council consider adopting restrictions to prevent
this unsightly occurrence.
Jullie continued that his office suggested to the residents
to first approach the Council in the manner of this petition.
Mayor Peterson responded that this matter had been brought to
the Council's attention prior to this meeting, and in light of
the petition, he directed Staff to research this situation
and report back to Council on the second meeting of January,
1988 with their research and recommendations.
City Council Minutes 7 December 15, 1987
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
None
IX. APPOINTMENTS
None
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
None
B. Report of City Manager
1. EAW Meeting
Jullie stated he attended a meeting that was called for
EAW and the Reuter solid waste processing plant. He
advised Council they would be receiving input and it
appears the plant would make an application. He
concurred from the meeting that an environmental impact
study was not necessary.
Anderson inquired if a timetable has been established.
Jullie responded not at this time.
Jullie reported on the public forum at Eisenhower
Community Center held on December 14th in reference to
the Southwest Suburban Corridor LRT line. Nearly all who
spoke to the Committee opposed or expressed reservations
about placing an LRT line on the abandoned rail line west
of Hopkins. After Committee members discussed what it
would recommend to HCRRA regarding alignment and station
locations, a motion was approved and adopted to endorse
both a northern and a southern alignment. Specifically,
it recommended that the HCRRA extend the system along the
southern alignment as soon as possible and at least as
far as Baker Road (at 1-494). Jullie concluded that it
would be important to maintain contact with County
Commissioners and County Staff regarding merits and
advantage of LRT along the southern alignment.
2. Waste Management Plan
Jullie reported on the Recycling Plan required by
Hennepin County and due on December 31, and stated the
plan outlines the work to be done and components which
might possibly be implemented during 1988. He added that
the financial data contained in the report does not
obligate the City to the expense of any fund.
Jullie asked the Council to adopt the plan allowing City
to remain open to final decisions.
City Council Minutes 8 December 15, 1987
MOTION:
Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson , to approve the 1988
Waste Management Plan to be submitted to Hennepin County.
Motion carried unanimously.
3. Hwy. 5 Power Line
Jullie reported that the Council had previously approved
funds to bury the NSP line on Hwy. 5 at a cost of $50,000.
NSP has now stated a more substantial amount for this
project and he cannot recommend approval to proceed at this
exorbitant cost.
Pidcock inquired of the new cost estimate. Jullie reported
it was over $100,000.
Jullie continued that in the future there may be some
beefing up of other lines so to eliminate the above ground
line along Hwy. 5. If NSP decides to bury the line, it
would charge the City. In most areas this was cost
feasible as NSP rebates the hook-up cost to the City over a
five-year period for each new hook-up. However in this
area there was little potential for new hook-up.
Pidcock inquired if there was another approach to
negotiating with NSP. She commented there were less
service outages underground than above.
Anderson inquired if it was reasonable in the near future
to have no overhead lines in the City. Staff responded
affirmatively.
Pidcock stated she felt it was the City's prerogative to
allow NSP to lay lines through the City, and in turn the
City to assess property owners using those lines.
Anderson inquired to City Attorney Pauly if NSP wanted to
run lines through our City, can the City state they must go
underground.
Pauly replied he was not prepared to answer at this time,
but would obtain the answer for Council.
Jullie stated the City requires many new subdivisions and
that was an issue in the negotiations. If the lines are
going in a downtown area, NSP absorbs the cost for
underground cable.
Peterson suggested Jullie continue negotiating with NSP.
C. Report of City Attorney
Pauly requested a meeting to discuss the matter of erosion
on the bluff.
Jullie reported that the hole has not been filled. The
City has been working on right-of-entry onto the property.
City Council Minutes 9 December 15, 1987
This was a hazard to the community and Mr. Seavall would
not allow access to his property.
Jullie stated City Attorney Pauly was getting ready for
legal right-of-entry and would be pursuing that. The
right-of-entry states there was a hazardous condition and
specific work needs to be done by a specific time. If
the property owner fails to do it, the City would do the
work and assess the cost to the property owner and
collect.
Mayor Peterson stated the Council was anxious to have
this condition resolved and if it requires a special
meeting, the Council was available.
D. Report of Director of Planning
None
E. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Preserve Center Access Trail
Lambert reported that on December 7, 1987 the Parks,
Recreation and Natural Resources Commission considered
the advisability of keeping open the trail which connects
Preserve Village Mall and the residential neighborhood to
the southwest. On a 4-2 vote, the Commission recommended
that the Council leave the trail open, and that it
attempt to correct the concerns of the adjacent neighbors
through our design of the trail, extensive landscaping,
and installation of a split rail fence.
Mayor Peterson inquired to Lambert what the cost would be
to correct the concerns of the residents. Lambert stated
a ball park figure would be $3-4000.
Mayor Peterson inquired to Lambert if this cost would be
absorbed by three parties: City, Homeowner's Association,
and Ryan Construction. Lambert stated the parties indicated
they would share the cost but did not mention to what
dollar amount.
Bentley stated it might be appropriate for discussion
this evening, but to delay action until specific plans
and costs are presented.
Mayor Peterson felt the Council should hear facts available
this evening in case Council decides to approve.
Larry Paumen, 9712 Clark Circle, stated that when he
attended the special meeting and explained the incidents,
he was informed he did not have pictures or anything in
writing stating the events in question. On that note, he
pesented photographs of the area explaining the
vandalism, and property damage.
City Council Minutes 10 December 15, 1987
He questioned Ryan Construction's commitment to landscape
design when the original design was estimated at $15,000
and then abandoned due to cost. The path was not used in
the winter and he requested a sign be posted stating the
path was closed, and then see if there was any reaction
from residents.
He wanted the City to know chat the path was a true
nuisance to the residents, and asked why not have a
sidewalk along Garrison Way. This path through his
property leads out to a loading dock area which was
dangerous for kids.
Lambert, responding to the idea of a sidewalk along
Garrison Way, stated this could have and should have been
done before the homes were built. Now the City would have
to contend with front yards and driveways and this was
tough because houses are in place.
Anderson commented that the traffic along the streets in
that area was heavy, and stated he would be opposed to
closing trail because there was no other access to the
stores and a safe access to businesses on the east side
of County Road 1.
Peterson inquired if the trail was maintained in the winter.
Lambert stated homeowners have done it in the past, as
well as the hardware store.
Paumen asked Council if littering was against the law,
damage to property against the law, foul language against
the law.
Anderson replied that when the kids are little, everyone
wants the trails. When the kids become teenagers a few
years later, thoughts shift to get rid of the trail because
these kids are destructive.
Pidcock commented that there are many residents who
assume this trail would never be closed. Perhaps a sign
could be posted restricting bikes from being used on the
trail. She also stated there was a curfew, and after a
certain hour no one should be on the trail.
Paumen asked Council to consider a gate with sign stating
access hours, etc.
Bob Humphreys, 9365 Garrison Way, spoke to the fact that
vandals have torn the fence down, vandalized his
property, and the City admits this was against the law.
He felt from the comments by the Council that no matter
what the residents said, the City would not close the
path regardless. The Council advised him to hold
violators until police arrive. He stated he does not want
to call police for small matters such as foul language,
littering, and riding mopeds on the trail. But if the
Council wants the Public Safety personnel's time used
this way, so be it; they would call the police each time
City Council Minutes 11 December 15, 1987
there was a violation. He was very concerned for
safety of his family. He has found footprints in the
snow by his patio door and in view of the the recent
rapes in the area, this was very frightful. If the City
fails to aid the residents in this matter, he would be
forced to sell his home. He stated the home next to his
has had three owners in three years. When he moved into
the property in 1979 it was without a shopping center.
One year later in came the shopping center and the
residents were told to tolerate it. It has been 9 years
and the residents still tolerate it and it is getting
worse not better.
Peterson interjected that the Council is very concerned and
that was why the Council was now attempting to resolve
this, but the change was one of the consequences of living
in a bigger town.
Humphreys asked Council if their homes were sitting just 8
feet from a $1,000,000 operation. He believed the Council
was going to let two homes suffer for the rest of the area.
Bentley stated that the City has many trails between homes
and backyards. The comprehensive trail system was to
access, by pedestrian means, the City of Eden Prairie. He
resented the implication that Council does not care when it
does in fact care very much, and felt there was no reason
why the residents should suffer.
Anderson stated unless there was a safer way to get to
the shopping center, it was in the best interest of the
community to allow it to remain open.
Humphreys commented that the City provides a safe path
that dumps into an asphalt loading dock and busy parking
lot area.
Anderson asked residents to identify the people in
violation with specifics, and give this information to the
police in an attempt to restrict this to pedestrians.
Anderson noted the City could handle this in a different
manner before electing to close the trail.
MOTION:
Anderson moved, seconded by Peterson to approve the
recommendations of Parks, Recreation and Natural
Resources subject to review of the landscape plan, review
of the cost of landscaping, and review of the gate or the
fence. Motion carried unanimously.
Bentley requested Staff to report back to Council on the
second meeting in January about questions regarding
adequate screening on the Paumen property. Jullie
responded that work would not commence until spring.
City Council Minutes 12 December 15, 1987
F. Report of Director of Public Works
1. Five-Year Capital Improvements Project Budget
Eugene Dietz, Director of Public Works, presented the
1988 Capital Improvements Budget for discussion and
review to Council.
Dietz further reported that the State Land Planning Act
mandates that the CIP be reviewed by the Planning
Commission, which would in turn forward it to the City
Council with recommendations. Dietz recommends that the
CIP be sent to Planning Commission for its review.
Bentley commented there was a definite lack of information
regarding proposed funding mechanism. He asked what the
sources of funds proposed would be for project to project.
He requested to see how the City's Reserve Fund would be
impacted in the long term. He saw too many items that were
funded from the Reserve and was concerned.
Dietz responded that buildings, major equipment expend-
itures, and bike trails would be an obligation of the
general fund, but as the budget becomes more defined,
they would work toward a specific source of funding for
all categories. The present goal was to get something to
Council and present this to Planning Commission for their
review. At a future date, after Planning Commission
comments are received, a funding proposal and budget would
be presented to Council for approval.
Dietz commented on the Satellite Maintenance Facility
that was proposed. The City has the opportunity to
acquire the Clean Sweep Operation as a potential site for
storage and maintenance function. It has sufficient
space for the silt sand supply. The location would be
County Road 1 east of U.S. Hwy. 169; and would be an
excellent location for the purposes intended.
Bentley indicated a concern of how these items tie into
strategic plan. Do they fit into the projected five-year
budget? A specific issue was the liquor store slated for
1989. Would it be public or private operation? This has
not been decided as yet. Also City Hall land acquisition
was an issue that the Council has not approved.
Bentley stated there was a need for a program that would
tell the cost of this proposal. He directed Staff to
justify the impact on the budget and reserve fund.
Dietz commented that if the City growth pattern continues,
the water system capacity would have to be upgraded within
4 years. On the subject of water, Pidcock commented that
she has been receiving complaints about water having a
strong taste of chlorine. Dietz responded that in the
City Council Minutes 13 December 15, 1987
winter the City does have this problem when th
e
r
e
w
a
s
n
o
t
enough chlorine in the water. The temperatur
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
w
a
s
the reason, and the City makes adjustments o
n
a
d
a
i
l
y
b
a
s
i
s
.
Pidcock requested information for Council on
t
h
e
difference of liquor store being privately-o
w
n
e
d
a
n
d
paying taxes versus City owning the liquor s
t
o
r
e
.
Peterson asked the Staff to refine this elab
o
r
a
t
e
proposed budget before Council takes action
.
H
e
a
l
s
o
felt the Council should review this before b
e
i
n
g
s
e
n
t
t
o
Planning Commission which could thereby plac
e
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
i
n
a politically embarrassing situation if any o
f
t
h
e
s
e
items were acted on prior to Council approv
a
l
.
H
e
f
e
l
t
the Council should be comfortable with all t
h
e
i
t
e
m
s
before forwarding to Planning Commission.
Bentley inquired if there was a time constrai
n
t
a
n
d
a
s
k
e
d
City Attorney Pauly if approval was required
f
o
r
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
budget of this nature.
Pauly stated in reviewing capital improvement
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
t
does not mean that the entire picture needs t
o
b
e
approved just those items that have urgency,
a
n
d
t
h
e
n
step back and look at the rest in a more rela
x
e
d
f
a
s
h
i
o
n
.
Dietz responded that some of the projects are
g
o
i
n
g
t
o
b
e
pressing forward. One in particular was the
s
i
g
n
a
l
s
a
t
MCA intersections. The budget indicated six
s
i
g
n
a
l
s
a
n
d
the City has funds for three.
Peterson stated receipt of the plan does not
c
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
a
n
y
approval of any part or all of it. Council wo
u
l
d
r
e
v
i
e
w
it.
Anderson asked Dietz what timeline he was loo
k
i
n
g
a
t
.
Dietz responded 2 to 3 months, and no action w
a
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
at this meeting.
Bentley moved that this proposed budget not
g
o
t
o
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Commission until source of funding was esta
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
a
n
d
greater discussion by Council had taken plac
e
.
Anderson stated this budget should be sent t
o
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Commission for its review and comments which
w
o
u
l
d
a
s
s
i
s
t
Council in their discussion. He also reques
t
e
d
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
Staff input before approval.
Pauly stated the sole function of the Planni
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
with regards to the Capital Improvements Pro
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
was to verify that projects are in complianc
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
City's comprehensive guideplan.
Council directed Dietz to follow that langua
g
e
i
n
forwarding the budget to the Planning Commiss
i
o
n
.
City Council Minutes 14 December 15, 1987
XI. NEW BUSINESS
1. Terex Loader Buy-Back
Eugene Dietz stated a memo in the last meeting packet to
Council spoke of the purchase of a Terex Wheel Loader in
1981. The City awarded the contract to Borchert-Ingersoll
with a guaranteed five year "buy-back" provision for a fixed
price of $92,800.00.
During the interim, due to the economy, Borchert-Ingersoll has
found themselves in a position of not being able to fulfill the
contract provision.
In lieu of litigating the matter and incurring the associated
expenses, the City Staff has been negotiating for almost a year
and felt an acceptable settlement would be to fix the value of
the present loader at $48,500.00. Borchert would reimburse the
City of Eden Prairie the amount of the difference between the
established value and the "buy-back" price of $44,300.00.
Borchert would pay this back in monthly installments over a
three-year period at 10% interest. Borchert would supply the
City with a new set of tires for the loader and repaint the
machine.
Dietz continued that after verbally agreeing to this
settlement, they requested that it not be in written form.
They requested to appear before the Council and enter into a
verbal agreement with the City. Their reason was that a
written agreement would cause problems with their auditors.
Bentley stated his objection to this issue. It was not on
the agenda, details were not before the Council, and it had
legal implications.
Pidcock stated she was comfortable with discussing this
issue.
Pauly stated he was somewhat familiar with this transaction.
The City would enter into a written agreement after the first
of the year.
MOTION:
Pidcock moved and Anderson seconded to place this item on the
agenda. Motion passed 3-1-0 (Bentley opposed)
John Laipple, representative and employee of Borchert-
Ingersoll, stated a dollar figure of $44,300.00 with 10%
interest over a 36 month period with new tires and a paint
job was the agreed settlement.
When questioned about verbal agreement, Michael stated he was
not aware of that stipulation or the reason. He was under
direction by his firm to come before the Council and confirm
the agreement.
City Council Minutes 15 December 15, 1987
MOTION:
Anderson moved, and Pidcock seconded to continue this item at
the second meeting in January. Motion passed unanimously.
2. Special Council Meetings
Jullie reported a special meeting of the City Council was
scheduled for December 22, at 6:00 PM for approval of sale of
$5,000,000 of bonds.
A strategic planning meeting was scheduled for January 8th
from 9-5.
A meeting for discussion of the new City Hall would be on
January 13th at 7:00 PM.
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION:
Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to adjourn at 10:22 PM.
Motion carried unanimously.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
The Council then met in executive session to discuss potential
contests and litigation regarding the Flying Cloud Landfill.
This session adjourned at 11:00 PM.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Wednesday, January 13, 1988
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:
CITY STAFF PRESENT:
7:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and
Patricia Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie and
Assistant to the City Manager Craig
W. Dawson
ROLL CALL: All Councilmembers were present.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilmember Bentley moved and Councilmember Pidcock seconded to
approve the agenda. Motion passed 5 - O.
II. DISCUSSION OF RECOMMENDATIONS OF CITIZENS REPORT ON NEW CITY HALL
Mayor Peterson acknowledged the presence of eight persons in the
audience who were members of the Residents Advisory Committee on City
Administrative Offices.
City Manager Jullie introduced the subject.
Bentley wished to discuss first the issue of having a City Hall built
with bonds approved by referendum or by establishment of a building fund
as recommended by the Committee. He was not totally convinced that the
concept for a referendum should be abandoned yet. Longer-term bonds
approved by referendum would spread out payments in smaller annual
amounts. He also said it would be difficult to convince residents that
a building fund was proper after previously offering a referendum. He
wished to have one more opportunity for a referendum.
Peterson said that based on the survey of residents, the community
realized that a City Hall was needed. Issues important on the
referendum were location and the perception of a grandiose building.
Councilmember Harris thought that a proactive approach was necessary. A
forward-looking, dedicated fund would be well-received. She supported
this concept. Councilmember Pidcock agreed with Harris. She believed
that the Council would be derelict in its duties if it did not provide
adequate space.
Peterson believed that having space for city administration is required
of a city government. Such things as ballfields and enclosed sheets of
ice are not required and thus more appropriate for referenda.
Councilmember Anderson stated that the crisis situation about space is
over. Now the Council needs to start planning for 1993. Acquiring a
site is extremely important because land is not getting cheaper.
Bentley said that because there is a public perception that a City Hall
is needed, then having a successful referendum should not be difficult.
City Council Minutes - 2 - Wed. ,January 13, 1938
Harris said that residents responded negatively because they were having
many referenda put in front of them in a short period of time. She
suggested that smaller incremental sums could be accumulated and a
smaller bond authorization needed from a referendum. Anderson said that
either financing alternative is acceptable to him. He wished that the
site be secured this year.
Peterson mentioned that there have been several conversations in the
past few months about a special downtown in Eden Prairie, and that
several persons had mentioned that a City Hall might fit within it.
This idea was not available to the Committee during its deliberations.
He asked if the Committee should be reconvened to look at this idea.
Bentley mentioned the possibility of a lease-purchase of a building in
the downtown. This is another alternative which may diminish the
capital cost to the City because the City may not have to own the land.
Peterson wondered how long it would be before the Council knew if a
downtown would happen. He did not wish to delay Council action on the
City Hall matter if the downtown were to remain a speculative
possibility for a long period of time.
Anderson asked how large the City's general fund reserve was and how
much of it could be used for land purchase. The City Manager responded
that the balance was $1.8 million, and he would recommend that not much
of the reserve be used (primarily for purposes of maintaining the City's
bond rating). A land purchase could be accomplished over five years.
Harris said that City Halls tend to define downtown. The sites
recommended by the Committee are centrally located; that is, near
downtown or the center of the City that the Council is trying to
identify. The old City Hall site should be a fallback site only - it is
too far from the center. Bentley believed that an appropriate site
would be along the southwest quadrant of Prairie Center Drive and would
be a cornerstone for any downtown development. Pidcock said that a
decision to locate downtown would let the City know how quickly the
downtown development concept would fall into place. She noted that the
three sites recommended are close to other City facilities, and from her
view point this was important for administrative efficiency. Anderson
did not want a site perceived to be on a swamp or marsh if there were a
referendum involved. Any site needed to have salability. The Council
had more flexibility with a non-referendum approach.
Bentley asked the Committee members if they would reconvene and look at
including a downtown site evaluation, rommittee Co-Chair Marty Jessen
explained the site evaluation and scoring process used on the sites the
Committee had reviewed. While cost was an important consideration, the
idea of the value of a City Hall site was also discussed. Committee
members were sensitive to a loss of tax base by having a public site on
a choice piece of property. However, a City Hall might also be a spur
to development which would result in overall tax base gain. He did not
believe that the Committee needed to do the analysis. Rather, the City
should look at the costs and multiplier effects involved with a downtown
location. Peterson believed that the community would be well-served if
the Committee could review the proposal and report to the Council.
Jessen believed that the Committee could do this in a short period of
time.
City Council Minutes - 3 - Wed. ,January 13, 1988
Committee Co-Chair Rich Anderson related that the Committee did consider
the downtown area before there was an idea of the downtown. He
underscored the importance of acquiring the property soon. Based on the
residents survey, cost was identified as the most important factor and
this criterian led to the three sites the Committee recommended.
Bentley said that having the City Hall as a spur to development (a "loss
leader") could result in a lower price for the City. Assistant to the
City Manager Dawson said that the Committee had evaluated all sites
without speculating about the deal that the City could get through
negotiations for different pieces of property.
MOTION: Harris moved and Pidcock seconded to request that the Committee
look at sites in the nearly-defined downtown and report to the Council
by mid-March, 1988. Motion passed 5 - 0.
Anderson asked that the Committee look at the issue such that if a
downtown were developed, should a City Hall be there.
Peterson asked that the Finance Director run a variety of financing
alternatives. Bentley said that public/private partnerships should not
be totally ignored. He was concerned about dipping into the reserve
fund for the purchase of land. He said that the reserve fund could be
used to secure an option on property in 1988, and that major payments
could begin in 1989 or some later year. He wanted to save the reserve
funds for "true emergencies".
MOTION: Bentley moved and Anderson seconded that Staff prepare
financing alternatives for site acquisition and building construction.
Motion passed 5 - O.
Jessen suggested that the City consider an inter-fund loan in order to
take advantage of an attractive cash deal.
MOTION: Bentley moved and Harris seconded to adopt recommendation No. 4
from the Committee with the exception of the two-story size and
construction cost figures. Motion passed 5 - O.
MOTION: Bentley moved and Anderson seconded that the March 1993 date
for occupancy be adopted as the Council's goal. Motion passed 5 - O.
Pidcock thanked the Committee for its thorough work.
Committee member Jim Rannow thought there might be difficulty in
defining a City Hall as a "keystone" for a downtown. The Committee did
not believe that this was important. Peterson thought that the keystone
concept was not a necessary one.
III. OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business.
IV. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Harris moved and Pidcock seconded to adjourn the meeting at
8:22 PM. Motion passed 5 - O.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
February 2, 1988
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.)
PLUMBING (continued)
Budd's Construction, Inc.
Construction 70, Inc.
Eden Incentives & Promotions
R & E Nelsen Plumbing & Htg.
Penner Developments, Inc.
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY)
D & R Construction
Finnish Sauna Builders, Inc.
Fox Fyre Constructors, Inc.
Gardner & Associates
Wes Hanson Builders, Inc.
Homeplace Builder's, Inc.
Lan-De-Con, Inc.
Laurent Builders, Inc.
Lenzen Construction
Richard Marple Builders,Inc.
Metro Summit Builders, Inc.
Narr Construction, Inc.
R.C.L. Company
R & I Construction, Inc.
Residential Home Builder
Swenson Construction of Otisco
Tancor Construction
PLUMBING
Arnold Bing Plumbing, Inc.
Blaylock Plumbing Co.
Loren Brown Plumbing
Bruce Plumbing Company
Burkhardt Plumbing Co.
Wayne Burville Plumbing
Clark Plumbing
Crosstown Plumbing, Inc.
D. C. Mechanical
Matthew Daniels (Dan the Plumber)
T. H. Denison Plumbing
Dependable Well Company
Design Mechanical Services
Doran Enterprises
Groth Water & Sewer
Raymone E. Haeg Plumbing
Harris Mechanical Contracting
Hokanson Plumbing, Inc.
Horwitz, Inc.
Dale Johnson Plumbing, Inc.
J. R. Kelly Plumbing & Heating
Lakeside Plumbing & Heating
Randy Lane & Son Plb. & Htg., Inc.
Larson Plumbing
Le Vahn Brothers, Inc.
Mac Donald Plumbing Co.
McGuire & Sons Plumbing & Heating
Mevissen Plumbing
Minnesota Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Jim Murr Plumbing & Heating
R & E Nelson Plumbing & Heating Co.
Nickelson Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Northern Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Northland Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
Northridge Plumbing Company
Nuebel Plumbing & Heating
Penn Plumbing
Eide Plumbing Company
Project Plumbing Company, Inc.
R C Plumbing
Royal Plumbing & Heating
Schlefsky Plumbing
Steve Schmit Plumbing
Schulties Plumbing, Inc.
Seitz Bros.,
Shank Mechanical, Inc.
Southtown Plumbing, Inc.
Star Plumbing & Excavating, Inc.
State Mechanical, Inc.
Thoen Plumbing & Heating
Steinkraus Plumbing, Inc.
TEK Mechanical Service,Inc.
Westonka Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Williams Mechanical Contractor
Zachman Plumbing
GAS FITTER
Abel Heating, Inc.
Blaylock Plumbing Co.
Blizzard Air, Inc.
Cedar Valley Htg. & Air Conditioning
Centraire, Inc.
Climate Engineering Company
D. J.'s Heating & Air Conditioning
Dependable Heating & Air Conditioning
CLERK'S APPLICATION LIST
page two
GAS FITTER (continued)
Ditter, Inc.
Domestic Mechanical
Economy Gas Installers
Fair Air Mechanical
Flare Heating & Air Cond.
Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal
Raymond E. Haeg Plb., Inc.
Hoffman's, Inc.
Horwitz, Inc.
J & H Gas Services
Lakeside Plumbing & Heating
Larson Plumbing
Market Mechanical, Inc.
Midland Heating & Air Cond.
Minnegasco, Inc.
Minneaota Fib. & Htg., Inc.
R & E Nelsen Fib. & Htg. Co.
Northland Mechanical Contractors
Northridge Plumbing Co.
Northwest Htg. & Air Cond.
Rich's Heating & Air Cond.
Ron's Mechanical, Inc.
Rouse Mechanical, Inc.
Schulties Plumbing, Inc.
Southtown Plumbing, Inc.
Standard Heating & Air Cond.
Steinkraus Plumbing, Inc.
Westonka Plumbing & Heating
Williams Mechanical Cont.
HEATING & VENTILATING
Abel Heating, Inc.
Allan Mechanical, Inc.
Associated Heating, Inc.
B & D Plumbing & Heating
Bostrom Sheet Metal
Cedar Valley Heating & Air
Centraire, Inc.
Climate Engineering
Construction Mechanical Services
D. J.'s Heating & Air Cond.
Dependable Heating & Air Cond.
Ditter, Inc.
Domestic Mechanical
Dronen's Heating & Air
Fair Air Mechanical
Flare Heating & Air Cond.
General Sheet Metal
Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal
Hoffman's, Inc.
HEATING & VENTILATING (continued)
Horwitz, Inc.
ITS Services,Inc.
Judkins Heating & Air Conditioning
Magnuson Sheet Metal
Market Mechanical, Inc.
Master Mechanical, Inc.
Midland Heating & Air Conditioning
Minnesota Plumbing & Heating
Narkie Heating & Air Conditioning
R & E Nelsen Plumbing & Heating
Northland Mechanical Contractors
Northwest Heating & Air Conditioning
O'Keefe Mechanical, Inc.
Owens Services Corporation
Pioneer Sheet Metal,Inc.
Rich's Heating & Air Conditioning
Ron's Mechanical, Inc.
Rouse Mechanical, Inc.
Royal Plumbing & Heating
E.A.H Schmidt & Associates, Inc.
Southside Heating & Air Conditioning
Standard Heating & Air Conditioning
Sunburst Heating & Air Conditioning
TEK Mechanical Service, Inc.
Thompson Air, Inc.
Walker Heating
UTILITY INSTALLER
Hokanson Plumbing, Inc.
Lakeside Plumbing & Heating
R & E Nelsen Plumbing & Heatina
State Mechanical, Inc.
Sullivan's Services, Inc.
United Water & Sewer Company
SEPTIC SYSTEMS
Bohn Well Drilling Co., Inc.
Lakeside Plumbing & Heating
Sullivan's Services, Inc.
WELL DRILLING
Bohn Well Drilling Co.
Dependable Well Company
E. H. Renner & Sons,Inc.
Rogers Well Company
WATER SOFTENER
Minnesota Plumbing & Heating
Surge Soft Water
CLERK'S APPLICATION LIST
page three
CIGARETTE MECHANICAL GAMES
A & J Enterprises
ARA Services
Superamerica Station
Target Store
FOOD VEHICLE
A & J Enterprises
American Amusement Arcades
PEDDLAR
Ben A. Isder (firewood)
Marvin Michael Warzecha (firewood)
3.2 BEER ON SALE
TYPE B FOOD
Target Store
Joan's Gift Baskets
PDQ Food Store
TYPE C FOOD
PDQ Food Store
E. P. Robins, Inc.
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the
licensed activity.
96-1- /11-0
Pat Solfe, licensing
Southgate Addition
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 61-87
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the R1-22 District and be placed in the R1-13.5 District.
Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be,
and hereby is removed from the R1-22 District and shall be included hereafter in the
R1-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in
City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended
accordingly.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of
that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of February 2, 1988, entered into
between William Smith, an individual, and the City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement
is hereby made a part hereof.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 15th day of December, 1987, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 2nd day of
February, 1988.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk nary D.-Riterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
Exhibit A
Legal Description
Lot 20, Auditors Subdivision No. 225, Hennepin County, Minn
e
s
o
t
a
Southgate Addition
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of
, 1988, by
William Smith, an individual, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY
OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning District change from R1-22
to R1-13.5 on 2.3 acres and Preliminary Plat of 2.3 acres into six single family
residential lots, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully
described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage
hereinafter referred to as "the property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #61-87,
Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of
said property as follows:
1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the
materials revised and dated October 22, 1987, reviewed and approved
by the City Council on December 15, 1987, and attached hereto as
Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided
herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain
the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by
Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of
all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Developer acknowledges that the property will benefit from any
future improvements to St. Andrews Drive and agrees to pay its fair
share of the corresponding special assessments for said
improvements. Therefore, prior to release by the City of the final
plat, Developer agrees to execute a special assessment agreement
with the City for purposes of extending public street and utilities
along St. Andrews Drive to service the property.
4. Prior to any issuance of any permit for grading or building on the
property, Developer agrees to submit to the Chief Building Official
and obtain the Chief Building Official's approval of plans for
demolition and/or removal of the existing foundation on the
property, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
Prior to removal of the existing foundation, Developer shall provide
to the City a certified check in the amount of $1,000.00 to
guarantee the restoration of the property to grade.
City agrees to return said certified check to Developer after the
removal of the existing foundation is completed and after it is
verified by City that said foundation has been properly removed, and
that the property has been restored to grade.
5. Developer shall notify the City and the Watershed District 48 hours
prior to any grading on the property.
6. Prior to issuance of any grading permit upon the property, Developer
shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's
approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer,
and erosion control for the property.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or
cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said
plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit
C, attached hereto.
7. Developer has submitted a tree inventory of those trees on the
property which are not planned to be removed by construction,
indicating the size, type, and location of all trees twelve (12)
inches in diameter, or greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground
level.
Developer agrees that, prior to grading on the property, Developer
shall implement erosion control measures and adequate protective
measures for areas to be preserved and areas where grading is not to
occur, and to receive City approval of said measures. Developer
agrees that said protective measures shall include, but not be
limited to:
A. Grading shall be confined to that area of the property
within the construction limits.
B. Snow fencing shall he placed at the construction limits of
the property prior to any grading upon the property.
C. City shall perform an on-site inspection of said protective
measures on the property by the City. Developer shall
contact City for said inspection. Developer agrees that
defects in materials and workmanship in the implementation
of said measures shall then be determined by the City.
D. Defects in materials or workmanship, if any, shall be
corrected by Developer. Developer agrees to call City for
reinspection of the implementation measures, and to receive
approval by the City prior to issuance of the grading permit
- by the City. Approval of materials and workmanship may be
subject to such conditions as the City may impose at the
time of acceptance.
8. If any trees, as described in #7. above, are removed, damaged, or
destroyed outside of the construction area, Developer agrees that
prior to issuance of any building permit for the property, Developer
shall:
A. Submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the
Director's approval of a reforestation plan for all trees
removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction
area. Said plan shall indicate that the trees shall be
replaced by similar tree species and that the trees used for
reforestation shall be no less than six inches in diameter.
The amount of trees to be replaced shall be determined by
the Director of Planning, using a square inch per square
Qr.." inch basis, according to the area of the circle created by a
cross sectional cut through the diameter of a tree as
measured 4.5 feet above the ground.
B. Prepare and submit to the Director of Planning, and receive
the Director's approval of a written estimate of the costs
of the reforestation work to be completed.
C. Submit a bond, or letter of credit, guaranteeing completion
of all reforestation work as approved by the Director of
Planning. Developer agrees that the amount of the bond, or
letter of credit, shall be 150% of the approved estimated
cost of implementation of all reforestation work and shall
be in such form and contain such other provisions and terms
as may be required by the Director of Planning.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall
implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements listed
above in said plans, as approved by the Director of Planning.
9. Developer agrees to install a sign at the most northern and eastern
terminus of the public street to be constructed on the property,
indicating that the street is a "temporary dead-end" to be extended
through the adjacent property, in order that the street not become
known as a permanent cul-de-sac.
Southgate Addition
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-28
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE 61-87 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 61-87 was adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of February,
1988;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 61-87, which is
attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said
text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said
ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 61-87 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein,
within 20 days after said publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on February 2, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Southgate Addition
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 61-87
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNE
S
O
T
A
,
R
E
M
O
V
I
N
G
C
E
R
T
A
I
N
L
A
N
D
F
R
O
M
O
N
E
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMEN
D
I
N
G
T
H
E
L
E
G
A
L
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
O
F
L
A
N
D
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CIT
Y
C
O
D
E
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
1
A
N
D
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
1
.
9
9
,
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PRO
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
,
O
R
D
A
I
N
S
:
Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located
n
o
r
t
h
o
f
S
t
.
Andrew Drive and west of Baker Road, from
t
h
e
R
1
-
2
2
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
t
o
t
h
e
R
1
-
1
3
.
5
District, subject to the terms and conditions
o
f
a
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
'
s
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full
l
e
g
a
l
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effec
t
u
p
o
n
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
ATTEST:
/s/John D. Frane
/s/Gary D. Peterson City Clerk
Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the
day of
, 1988.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
l
e
r
k
.
)
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-24
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
WELTER'S PURGATORY ACRES 3RD ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of WELTER'S PURGATORY ACRES 3RD ADDITION has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code
and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been
duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for WELTER'S PURGATORY ACRES 3R0 ADDITION is
approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City
Engineer's report on this plat dated JANUARY 26, 1988.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving
the six-month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the
preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said
engineer's report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of
this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named
plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the
certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon
compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on FEBRUARY 2, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO:
Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician
DATE: January 26, 1988
SUBJECT: Welter Purgatory Acres 3rd Addition
PROPOSAL: TCR-Eden Prairie/Welter, The Developers, have requested City
Council approval of the final plat of Welter Purgatory Acres 3rd
Addition. The plat is located west of Bennett Place, north of County
Road 1, south of Olympia Drive in the north 1/2 of Section 26. Formerly
Outlot B of Welter Purgatory Acres 1st Addition, the plat contains 19.0
acres to be divided into 39 single family lots and right-of-way
dedication for street purposes.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council December 2,
1986, per resolution 86-291.
Zoning from Rural to R1-13.5 was approved by the City Council January
20, 1987, per Ordinance 57-86.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed
January 20, 1987.
VARIANCES: A variance from the requirements of City Code 12.20, Subd. 2.A,
waving the six-month maximum time elapse between the approval date of
the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be necessary.
All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities, streets, and walkways will
be installed by the Developer in conformance with City Standards. Prior
to the release of the final plat, a temporary cul-de-sac easement for
the terminus of Olympia Drive must be submitted.
The wetland in the southwest corner of the plat is a D.N.R. designated
wetland. It is recommended that the Developer provide the City with a
scenic easement over the wetland as defined on the plat by the drainage
and utility easements.
PAGE 2 OF 2
WELTER PURGATORY ACRES 3RD ADDITION
JANUARY 26, 1988
PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication will conform to the requirements of the
City Code and the Developer's Agreement.
BONDING: Bonding for municipal utilities and streets must be provide
d
p
r
i
o
r
to release of the final plat and conform to City Code and
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
'
s
Agreement requirements.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Welter Purgatory
Acres 3rd Addition subject to the requirements of this
r
e
p
o
r
t
,
t
h
e
Developer's Agreement, and the following:
1. Receipt of street sign fee of $804.00.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee of $5,768.00.
3. Receipt of engineering fee of $1,560.00.
4. Receipt of scenic easement over wetland area.
5. Receipt of temporary cul-de-sac easement for temporary turn-a
r
o
u
n
d
for south end of Olympia Drive.
6. Satisfaction of bonding requirements.
JJ:ss
cc: James Ostenson, TCR-Eden Prairie/Welter
Harold C. Peterson, James R. Hill, Inc.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-25
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
SOUTHGATE
WHEREAS, the plat of SOUTHGATE has been submitted in a manner
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
f
o
r
platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Ch
a
p
t
e
r
4
6
2
o
f
the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had the
r
e
u
n
d
e
r
,
a
n
d
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the C
i
t
y
p
l
a
n
a
n
d
t
h
e
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
a
n
d
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
E
D
E
N
P
R
A
I
R
I
E
:
A. Plat approval request for SOUTHGATE is approved upon complia
n
c
e
with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this p
l
a
t
dated JANUARY 27, 1988.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy
o
f
this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above na
m
e
d
plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute
t
h
e
certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon
compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on FEBRUARY 2, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
2 73
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician
DATE: January 25, 1988
SUBJECT: SOUTHGATE
PROPOSAL: The Developer, William Smith, has requested approval of the final
plat of Southgate. Located west of Baker Road and north of St. Andrews
Drive, the plat contains 2.29 acres to be divided into six single family
lots and right-of-way dedication for street purposes.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council December 15,
1987, per Resolution No. 87-324.
Second reading of Ordinance No. 61-87, changing zoning districts f
r
o
m
R1-22 to R1-13.5, is scheduled for final approval at the February
2
,
1988 City Council meeting.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report is schedul
e
d
for execution February 2, 1988.
VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of
Appeals.
STREETS AND UTILITIES: Municipal sanitary sewer and water is available in
St. Andrews Drive for extension into the site. All municipal utilitie
s
,
streets, and walkways involved with this project will be installed
i
n
conformance with City Code and Eden Prairie's Standard Specifications
.
City Improvement Contract Number 52-104 extended municipal utilities a
n
d
an improved street section through St. .Andrews Drive and Prairie Vie
w
Drive. As prescribed in item #3 of the Developer's Agreement, th
e
Developer shall enter into a special assessment agreement definin
g
developer's portion of improvement costs to St. Andrews Drive prior t
o
release of the final plat.
A temporary cul-de-sac easement for a temporary turn-around at th
e
easterly property line of the project must be submitted prior to releas
e
of the final plat.
PAGE 2 OF 2 SOUTHGATE JANUARY 26, 1988
PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the
Developer's Agreement.
BONDING: Bonding shall conform to the requirements of the Developer's
Agreement and City Code.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Southgate based on
the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement, and the
following:
1. Receipt of street sign fee of $499.00.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee of $1,064.00.
3. Receipt of engineering fee of $250.00.
4. Execution of special assessment agreement for improvement to St.
Andrews Drive.
5. Satisfaction of bonding requirements.
6. Receipt of temporary cul-de-sac easement.
JJ/ss
cc: William Smith
Ron Krueger & Associates
HENNEPIN
SURVEYOR
A703 Government Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0073
Phone (612) 348-3131
December 28, 1987
Carl Jullie, Manager
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Dear Mr. Jullie:
In 1970 this office surveyed, monumented and filed a plat of part of County State
Aid Highway No. 1 in your city. In conjunction with all our projects we have
instituted programs to eliminate error in the mechanical as well as human.
Unfortunately in the county road survey mentioned above a distance on the plat was
transposed.
Chapter 505 of Minnesota statutes has a provision that allows for correction of
errors on plats. In order to accomplish the intent of the statute, the involved
city must approve the certificate prior to filing with the county recorder.
I would appreciate your processing this document through your council and return
the document to me. I will see that this certificate is filed with the county
recorder as soon as I receive it.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
BEIL:ed
Enclosure
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an equal oppodunIty employer
c7C
1. That said plat is hereby corrected in the following particulars, to-wit:
The radius is corrected to read 430.53 feet. * See attached
Dated alc.,,,,,her 27 ,187
Hennepin-County Surveyor
Bernard H. Larson
Registration No. 9748
RECIMEED
LTD
WNW'?
9743
LAND SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTICN PLAT
Name of Plat: HENNEPIN COUNTY HIGSRAY PLAT ND. 6
Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 505.175 Minnesota Statutes, Bernard H. Larson,
the undersigned, a Registered Land Surveyor in and for the State of Minnesota, declares
as follows:
1. That said plat of a portion of County State Aid Highway No. I was prepared
under the direct supervision of Hennepin County Surveyor Elmer J. Peterson and
filed on July 21, 1970 in the office of County Recorder, Hennepin County,
Minnesota as Document No.3837760.
2. That said Elmer J. Peterson is retired and unavailable.
3. That said plat contains errors, omissions, or defects in the following
particulars, to-wit:
Location: Sheet 6 of 8 sheets of HENNEPIN cazrry HNY PLAT no. 6,
(C.S.A.H. NO. 1) in the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter of Section 20, Township 116, Range 22.
Error: The transposition in the Radius of the Survey Line in the most
easterly curve. Said curve data is designated as having a:
L - 60.04, C 59.99,Am 7 0 59' 26", T 30.07, R 403.53
The above Certificate of Correction to the plat of HENNEPIN COUNTY HIGHWAY PLAT NO. 6
has been approved by the
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
at a regular meeting of the
Minnesota, held on the day of
Mayor, City of Eden Prairie Manager, City of Eden Prairie
This instrument prepared by Hennepin County Surveyor
A703 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487
— This radius is incorrect'', ',It should be 430.53 -n X. LINE 4,4:sv /1' la-4i i0,f3L- L. • 27.3 34- -- CURVE DATA .z•L'ey,'9 * 41391e:4- NZ. ce-` C '279 20 Z....? R.2552 41 / / i 4. b. ..S. , / i 1 .i..,EY ,....' L:282.95 ... L•256.35 . "nn„, - N. ---.••••••n,,,*.....- € ) / 60 /1 q: ''',.. elfr ‘,....:;,-:". . ., ..b,/ i .... / eg4"n , --...... I / I 2 ...., 66103754"W 127.41 \ SURVEY LINE CURVE DATA L•60.04 C • 59.30 ••7•59.26" T•10,./T '.••-(11•403.5-3‘) CED4 p FCIREST/ 4 0 127.41 L•55.44T Cs66.40 i; C.28 2.8 1334.26 127. Al ,L.64.65 Cc 64.59 SURVEY LINE CURVE DATA L• 330.40 C. 330 IS A•T•04'32‘ T•165.•I R•t6T3.44 L.334-48 _ 330.40 C2326.12 - 5753053,3,0w 25 54 159 58 104.73. 739 S .5 6 LINE 325.54
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-26
RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT
AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, a report has been given by the City Engineer, through RCM, Inc., to
the City Council recommending the following improvements to wit:
I.C. 52-110 (Golden Triangle Drive)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements in accordance
with the report and the assessment of property abutting or within
said boundaries for all or a portion of the cost of the improve-
ment pursuant to M.S.A. Section 429.011 to 429.111, at an
estimated total cost of the improvements as shown.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the
1ST OF MARCH at 7:30 P.M. at the Eden Prairie City Hall, 7600
Executive Road. The City Clerk shall give published and mailed
notice of such hearing on the improvements as required by law.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on FEBRUARY 2, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
moves and
seconds the following:
DECISION
The project known as the "Creekview Residential Development"
does not have the potential for significant environmental effects
based upon the following record and findings of fact:
THE RECORD
The record in this case consists of the following:
a. Pages 150 through 205G, inclusive, of the agenda
materials for the meeting of the Council of the
City of Eden Prairie held on January 19, 1988;
b. Letter from Leighton J. Wilkie, dated January 13,
1988, to Honorable Gary D. Peterson;
Letter from Susan Varlamoff to Eden Prairie City
Council members, dated January 16, 1988;
d. Letter from Minnesota River Valley Audubon Club to
the Honorable Mayor and City Council of Eden
Prairie, dated January 17, 1988;
e. Letter from Roger B. Martin and Marjorie Pitz to
Dr. Doris Brooker, dated January 13, 1988, with
attachment;
f. Letter from Attorney James T. Martin to City
Council, dated January 15, 1988;
g. Letter from Ed Schlamp to Mayor Gary Peterson,
dated January 19, 1988;
-1-
h. Letter from Peter J. Knaeble to Michael Franzen,
dated January 18, 1988, together with attachment
dated January 19, 1988, entitled "Creekview RKA
Number 7624 Tree Removal/Replacement Calculation:"
i. Two letters from Nicholas Eoloff to Tony Phillippi,
dated January 13, 1988;
j
A three-dimensional model of the project area;
k. Letter from the Minnesota Environmental Quality
Board to Chris Enger, dated January 15, 1988,
together with attachments;
1. Oral statements made during the course of the hear-
ing before the Council on January 19, 1988;
m. Plans entitled Creekview dated 10-27-87, Project
No. 7624 (1-18-88 Option consisting of sheets 1-6
entitled Sheet 1, Preliminary Plat and Utility
Plan, Sheet 2, Grading and Erosion Control Plan,
Sheet 3, Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control
Plan, Sheet 4, Tree Inventory (East Half), Sheet 5,
Tree Inventory (West Half), and Sheet 6,
Preliminary Replacement Tree Plan;
n. Brown Land Company's exhibits:
(1) Land use;
(2) Purgatory Creek Study;
(3) Site features map;
(4) Soils;
(5) Site use concept;
-2-
(6) Plat concept;
(7) Preliminary Plat
1987, 1"=100';
(8) Preliminary Plat
1988, 1"=100';
(9) Preliminary Plat
1988, 1"=100';
(10) 1"=200 Purgatory
No. 1, dated October 27,
No. la, dated January 12,
No. lb, dated January 18,
Creek Corridor section maps
showing lots within the lower Purgatory Creek
Corridor within the transition and conservancy
zones;
(11) 1=200' Purgatory Creek Corridor section maps
identifying lots within 12 percent or greater
sloped areas;
(12) 1"=200' Hennepin County section map within
Hennepin County soils overlay map identifying
lots within the lower Purgatory Creek Corridor
Study that are within the HuE soils area;
(13) Slides including views of the following
subdivisions: Mill Creek, Hillsborrough,
Creekview Estates, Bluffs West, Bluffs West
4th and 6th Additions, Bluestem, Bluff Country
P.U.D., Bluffs East 4th and 5th Additions,
Creek Knolls, and Creek Ridge;
(14) 1"=60' grading plans showing limits of grading
prepared;
-3-
(15) 1"=60' tree inventory;
(16) 1=100 tree replacement plans.
HISTORY AND BACKGROUND
The proponent, Brown Land Company, hereafter called "Brown,"
applied for a Planned Unit Development Concept and District
review on 78.22 acres with variances, zoning district change from
Rural to R1-13.5 on 60.15 acres, and zoning district change from
Rural to R1-44 on 4.5 acres, and preliminary plat of 78.22 acres
into 93 single-family lots and two outlots, all of which is known
as "Creekview project" or "project." The project area lying
northerly of Riverview Road encompasses a segment of lower
Purgatory Creek and its valley for a distance of approximately
1700 feet. The project was considered by the Planning Commission
on November 9, 1987, and continued until December 14, 1987, at
which time the Planning Commission unanimously recommended
approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept, and District
review of 78.22 acres, zoning changes from Rural to R1-13.5 on
60.15 acres with variances, and preliminary plat of 78.22 acres
into 92 single-family lots, two outlots, and road right-of-way.
The matter was considered by the Parks, Recreation, and Natural
Resources Commission on December 21, 1987. That Commission rec-
ommended acceptance of the Creekview development. Subsequent to
the original plans dated October 27, 1987, the plans and project
were revised in several instances. The project considered and
approved by the Council is that contained in the 1-18-88 option,
providing for 87 single-family lots and 3 outlots.
-4-
FINDINGS
The following findings of fact are made in support of the
decision.
1. The proposed plan complies with the City's approved
Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
2. The project complies with the shoreline and flood plain pro-
visions of the City Code. All the building pads are at least
47 feet above the 100 year flood elevation.
3. The Creekview project is less dense (1.17 units per acre
gross) than would be permitted within the low density resi-
dential district pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Plan applicable to the project area and is less dense
than other comparable subdivisions within the lower Purgatory
Creek Corridor, described below.
4. The Creekview project has fewer and larger lots, (which
exceed the minimum lot size and lot area dimensions) than
required by the R1-13.5 residential zoning district.
5. Of the 78.22 acres encompassed in the project, 17.06 (21.81%
of the total project area), including all of the Purgatory
Creek Flood Plain, will be outside of the area platted into
lots for the construction of homes and for public streets,
utilities, etc. The 17.06 acres will remain undisturbed as a
result of the development.
6. Of the area platted for active development, such as the
building of homes, streets, and utilities, 8.2 acres or
approximately 10.5 % of the total project area would be sub-
-5-
ject to conservation restrictions preventing grading and
destruction of natural vegetation.
7. 3.62 acres situated South of Riverview Road, outside of the
Purgatory Creek Valley, are not proposed to be rezoned and
will not be developed or disturbed as a result of the
Creekview project.
8. Of the 78.22 acres, approximately 49 acres are subject to
development, i.e., platted and rezoned and outside the
conservancy area, of which only approximately 6 acres contain
trees within the grading limits.
9. Approximately 27 acres proposed to be platted, contain slopes
of 12% or greater, of which only approximately 15 acres would
be subject to grading for which protection would be provided
by established erosion control and construction techniques.
10. The total project area North of Riverview Road contains
approximately 19,124 caliper inches of trees 12 inches or
larger in diameter, of which 3,264 to 4,019 inches or 17%-21%
would be lost due to construction, but of which 996 to 1,366
would be replaced, resulting in a lesser net loss of 2,268 to
2,653 caliper inches of trees.
11. The removal of trees in the project area compares favorably
to an average of 31% on 20 other residential projects involv-
ing tree replacement.
12. The loss of "significant" trees is not excessive.
13. Development along the lower Purgatory Creek corridor extends
from County Road 1 to the subject site, a distance of approx-
-6-
imately 1.5 miles.
14. Development within the HUE soil series as delineated on
Hennepin County maps is comparable to other previously plat-
ted projects within the lower Purgatory Creek Corridor which
has not caused environmental harm.
15. Development along the Purgatory Creek corridor includes
houses built on the top edges of the bluff of Purgatory Creek
valley. No significant environmental harm has been caused by
those developments.
16. Except for two lots, the proposed development limits con-
struction of houses to the top edge of the bluff of Purgatory
Creek.
17. As to the two lots referred to in number 16 above, they will
be serviced by a private drive through a natural gully
through the bluff rim, which has been caused by natural
erosion. Construction of a private driveway through the
gully will mitigate and repair the erosion already caused by
natural forces in the vicinity of the valley in the following
respects:
a. The roadway design will control erosion of the ravine.
b. The private roadway will provide public safety and emer-
gency vehicle access for fires that may occur in the
Creek valley.
18. Municipal services including:
a. Sanitary sewer,
b. Storm sewer,
-7-
c. Municipal water,
d. Police,
e. Fire,
f. Parks and
g. Roadway systems
will not be adversely affected by the Creekview project.
19. The project is not premature in its timing.
20. The project will not negatively impact surrounding property
values.
21. The project is generally less intrusive, less aggressive,
less intense and less disruptive than other comparable
subdivisions within the lower Purgatory Creek Corridor.
-8-
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-29
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMOLUBE
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT
TO THE OVERALL NATIONAL CHILD CARE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for
the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the Amolube development is considered a proper amendment to the
overall National Child Care Planned Unit Development Concept; and,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the
request of Amoco Oil Company for PUD Concept Amendment approval to the overall
National Child Care Planned Unit Development Concept for the Amolube development and
recommended approval of the PhD Concept Amendment to the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on February 2, 1988;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Amolube development PhD Concept Amendment, being in Hennepin
County, Minnesota, and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A,
is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval to
the overall National Child Care Planned Unit Development Concept as
outlined in the application materials for Amolube.
3. That the PUD Concept Amendment meets the recommendations of the
Planning Commission dated January 11, 1988.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 2nd day of February, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City CliA
V13.
9.5*
PROPOSED SITE
1-2
AREA
T-1) .4;, fRi t R LOuATiuN MAPF
STAFF REPORT
Planning Commission
Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
January 8, 1988
Amolube Express Oil Change
Southeast quarter of Highway #169 and Anderson Lakes Parkway
Amoco Oil Company
1. Planned Unit Development Amendment Review on Lot 1, Block 1,
Anderson Lakes Commercial Center; Lot 1, Block 1, Outlots A,
B, and C, Anderson Lakes Commercial Center 2nd Addition.
2. Zoning District Amendment for Lot 1, Block 1, Anderson Lakes
Commercial Center 2nd Addition.
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Background
This tract of land is the location
of an existing Amoco Oil Service
Station reviewed and approved by the
Eden Prairie City Council in 1986.
The current request is for a Planned
Unit Development Amendment and
Zoning District Amendment to allow
for the construction of an Amolube
Express Oil Change facility on this
parcel in conjunction with the
Amoco Oil Service Station.
Site Plan
The site plan depicts the con-
struction of an Amolube Express Oil
Change facility on a 1.4-acre tract
located at the intersection of
Anderson Lakes Parkway and Aztec
Drive. This site is the location of
the existing Amoco Oil Service
Station. The proposed building con-
tains approximately 1,400 square
feet. Total building square footage
on this site would be 2,742 square
Amolube Express Oil Change 2 January 8, 1988
feet at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 4.5%. The proposed Amolube
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
w
i
l
l
b
e
located approximately 55 feet from the U.S. Highway #169 right-of-
w
a
y
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
o
f
a two-bay service facility. The site plan meets all the req
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
neighborhood commercial zoning district. To service this buildi
n
g
,
a
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
ten parking stalls are being constructed.
Grading/Utilities
This site was previously graded with the development of the A
m
o
c
o
O
i
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
Station in 1986. With the proposed building addition, the gradin
g
p
l
a
n
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
s
a
re-shaping cf the berm to allow for the construction of the
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
t
h
e
circular driveway. The berm, which is used for screening purpo
s
e
s
f
r
o
m
A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
Lakes Parkway and U.S. Highway #169, will essentially remain in it
s
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s
h
a
p
e
,
although it is proposed to be lowered by two feet. Site sec
t
i
o
n
s
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
submitted which indicate the screening of the parking areas and ove
r
h
e
a
d
d
o
o
r
s
.
In a letter dated January 4, 1988, MNDOT states that the berm alo
n
g
U
.
S
.
1
6
9
w
i
l
l
have to be removed as part of upgrading U.S. 169. The removal of th
e
b
e
r
m
i
s
d
u
e
t
o
a need for a temporary construction easement over that portion
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
needed for the backslope of the proposed drainage ditch (see Attach
m
e
n
t
A
)
.
B
e
c
a
u
s
e
the final design has not been completed for this project, the a
c
t
u
a
l
e
f
f
e
c
t
o
n
t
h
e
property cannot be determined. Regardless of MNDOT's actions, pro
p
e
r
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
o
f
the site is required per City Code. Based upon the final design
f
o
r
U
.
S
.
1
6
9
,
a
screening plan shall be provided by the proponent for Staff review.
Water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer were previously installed with the
construction of the Amoco Oil Service Station. Connections w
i
l
l
b
e
m
a
d
e
t
o
t
h
e
existing utilities on the property. The proponent is require
d
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
t
o
r
m
water run-off calculations to determine if an additional catch bas
i
n
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
n
e
e
d
e
d
to handle storm water run-off.
Landscaping
With the development of the Amoco Oil Service Station, 207 calip
e
r
i
n
c
h
e
s
o
f
p
l
a
n
t
material were provided on-site. The proposed plan depicts a re-l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
n
u
m
b
e
r
of these trees due to the new construction. The plan also propo
s
e
s
t
h
e
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
o
f
5, 10-foot spruce trees. Staff would recommend that these tr
e
e
s
b
e
r
e
-
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
throughout the site.
Architecture
The proposed building is rectangular in shape, measures 26 fee
t
b
y
5
0
f
e
e
t
a
n
d
contains approximately 1,300 square feet. The building is approxi
m
a
t
e
l
y
1
3
f
e
e
t
i
n
height with the two pre-finished metal end panels approximately 2
1
f
e
e
t
i
n
h
e
i
g
h
t
.
Primary building materials are facebrick, which would be the same
c
o
l
o
r
a
n
d
t
e
x
t
u
r
e
as the Amoco Station and the daycare center, pre-finished metal p
a
n
e
l
,
d
a
r
k
t
i
n
t
e
d
glass panel overhead doors, and pre-finished reflective panels
f
o
r
t
h
e
r
o
o
f
i
n
g
material. Building material samples and colors have been submitt
e
d
f
o
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
b
y
the Planning Commission and City Council.
Building material percentages have been calculated which indicate
t
h
a
t
5
5
%
o
f
t
h
e
exterior building finish is facebrick or better and that 45%
i
s
m
e
t
a
l
p
a
n
e
l
.
Overall building material percentages on-site are 70% and 30%, re
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
.
C
i
t
y
Code requires 75% of the exterior building finish be either fac
e
b
r
i
c
k
,
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
Amolube Express Oil Change 3 January 8, 1988
stone, or glass. In reviewing the architectural rendering, it appears that the pre-
finished metal panel end walls dominate the building. This is not consistent with
the Design Framework Manual's requirement for similar facade treatments and building
materials. Alternative building materials or design should be explored which would
be consistent with the Design Framework Manual and City Code.
Signage and Lighting
As stated in the narrative, a new pylon sign identifying the new Amolube facility
will replace the existing Amoco Oil sign located at the corner of U.S. Highway #169
and Anderson Lakes Parkway. This sign will be required to meet City Code. No
additional lighting is proposed for this facility.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the proposed Amolube facility based upon plans
dated December 10, 1987, subject to the Staff Report dated January 8, 1988, and
subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to City Council review, proponent shall:
A. Revise the landscape plan to reflect the relocation of all displaced
trees on the site.
B. Revise the building elevations to reflect the City Code requirement
of 75% facebrick or better.
2. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall notify the City and
Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading.
3. Based upon the final design of U.S. 169, the proponent shall submit a plan
to the City depicted adequate screening of the proposed parking areas and
overhead garage doors.
oNEso?
RI We
oF
Minnesota
Department of Transportation
District 5
2055 No. Lilac Drive
Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
January 4, 1988
(612)593 - 8502
Mr. Chris Enger
City Planner
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
RE: S.P. 2744-43 (T.H.169)
CSAM 1 to Prairie Center Drive
Dear Mr. Enger:
The proposed quick lube development plan at the southeast corner of T.H. 169
and Anderson Lake Parkway that was submitted to Evan Green has been referred
to us for comment. We have noted the following:
(1) The inplace berm along T.H. 169 is not compatible with the future ditch.
We are lowering the intersection slightly and will need to remove the
berm.
(2) To reduce the construction limits from what is now proposed (see en-
closed) may require storm sewer piping and additional City cost parti-
cipation.
(3) Sign at corner: Our Right of Way Office presently has a temporary
easement proposed for the construction limits on this property, but we
could adjust the ditch backslopes or use a small berm/retaining wall to
leave this sign inplace. It is outside the T.H. 169 safety clear zone,
but we will need to review the intersection sight distances to determine
if the sign and proposed plantings will be a problem.
(4) Our construction will disturb the underground lawn sprinkler system. If
any of this system is on our right of way, we will not replace that
portion; if it is on the temporary easement we obtain, we could replace
that portion.
(5) The 1980 S.A.P. 181-010-05 project for Anderson Lakes Parkway showed a
triangular shaped "easement" at the corner for the walkway. Was this a
permanent or temporary easement?
Also enclosed for your information are some of the plan sheets from our
preliminary plans. If you have any questions, please call me at 593-8502.
Sincerely,
ese
Glen Ellis, P.E.
District Final Design EngineerAn Equal Opportunity ErwOoyer
•*7.21 ATTACHMENT A
--it.-1414DERSO ES-41-A
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-30
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PAX CHRISTI CATHOLIC CHURCH
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT
TO THE OVERALL PAX CHRISTI CATHOLIC CHURCH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for
the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the Pax Christi Catholic Church development is considered a proper
amendment to the overall Pax Christi Catholic Church Planned Unit Development
Concept; and,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the
request of Pax Christi Catholic Church for PUO Concept Amendment approval to the
overall Pax Christi Catholic Church Planned Unit Development Concept for the Pax
Christi Catholic Church development and recommended approval of the PUD Concept
Amendment to the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on February 2, 1988;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, as follows;
1. The Pax Christi Catholic Church development PUD Concept Amendment,
being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, and legally described as
outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval to
the overall Pax Christi Catholic Church Planned Unit Development
Concept as outlined in the application materials for Pax Christi
Catholic Church.
3. That the PUG Concept Amendment meets the recommendations of the
Planning Commission dated January 11, 1988.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 2nd day of February, 1988.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
- AREA LOCATION MAP
STAFF REPORT
Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
January 8, 1988
Pax Christi Catholic Church Building Expansion
12100 Pioneer Trail
Pax Christi Catholic Church
1. Planned Unit Development Amendment Review on 38 acres.
2. Zoning District Amendment within the Public zoning district
on 38 acres.
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Background
This 38-acre site is currently zoned
Public. There is an existing church
on this property totalling 26,965
square feet.
Site Plan
The site plan depicts the con-
struction of an addition to the
existing structure totalling 19,220
square feet. The Floor Area Ratio
(FAR) based upon the new gross
building square footage of 48,185
square feet would be 0.04. Building
and parking areas meet the minimum
setback requirement for Public
zoning. The amount of parking
required is based upon the seating
capacity which will be expanded from
1,200 to 1,530 seats, thus requiring
a total of 510 parking spaces. A
total of 510 parking spaces are
depicted on the proposed site plan.
Grading/Screening
This site impacts the Purgatory
Pax Christi Building Expansion 2 January 8, 1988
Creek corridor. Although no grading or construction is proposed within the
conservancy area of the creek, there is a requirement in the Shoreland Ordinance
that the parking areas be screened from the creek. The proponent must supply site
line and screening information which depict the screening of the parking areas.
There is adequate distance between the parking areas and the creek such that
screening of the parking areas would not be difficult to accomplish. It is
recommended that, prior to review with the City Council, the proponent demonstrate
screening of the parking areas per the Shoreland Ordinance.
Architecture
The building addition will be constructed out of face brick and glass in compliance
with the exterior materials provision of the City Code. The building architecture
will be consistent with the existing building.
Traffic
In the past, there have been traffic and parking problems associated with the Pax
Christi Church. The provision of additional parking should alleviate the parking
congestion and problems along the County Road #1 right-of-way. In addition, the
completion of Homeward Hills Road provides another access in to and out of the site
without having to use Pioneer Trail. At the time the road was open, the Engineering
Department decided to wait a couple of months until the traffic patterns had
stabilized before taking new traffic counts on Homeward Hills Road and Pioneer
Trail. If traffic counts warrant a signal, then the Engineering Department will
contact the County for review of the information. It is expected that the traffic
counts will be taken in the near future.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the request for Planned Unit
Development Amendment and Zoning District Amendment on 38 acres based upon plans
dated December 4, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report, dated
January 8, 1987, and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to Council review, propcnent shall:
A. Submit the required information to demonstrate effective screening
of parking areas per the Shoreland Ordinance from Purgatory Creek.
2. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Notify the City and Watershed District in advance of any additional
site grading.
B. Submit detailed grading and storm water run-off plans for review by
the City Engineering Department.
C. Submit samples of proposed building materials for review by the
Planning Department.
FEBRUARY 2,1988
40124
40125
40126
0127
1( 128
0129
40130
40131
40132
40133
40134
40135
40136
40137
40138
40139
40140
40141
40142
40143
40144
40145
40146
40147
40148
40149
40150
40151
40152
'153
• i54
40155
40156
40157
40158
40159
40160
40161
40162
40163
40164
40165
40166
40167
40168
40169
40170
40171
40172
40173
40174
40175
40176
40177
40178
AFTON ALPS
CONSOLIDATED COACHES
AFTON ALPS
MC DONALDS
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
JUDY ASSELMEIER
DANIEL BOECKERMAN
ROBERT BUCHHOLZ
CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO
CLERK OF COURT
EAGLE WINE CO
PATTI ELLINGSON
CONSTANCE EWING
FEIST BLANCHARD CO
ALORA FOLEY
DIANE GRIESBACH
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
ROGER HARRO
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
ELLEN KERBER
KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO
SHARON KRUMM
MN CHAPTERIAAI
VOID OUT CHECK
NORTHWESTERN BELL
PAUSTIS & SONS
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
PRIOR WINE CO
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS
JANIS SIEMERS
TODD SLAWSON
STATE OF MINNESOTA
BARBARA STFLICH
UPPER MIDWEST HOSPITALITY
TERRIE WHITTENBURG
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
ICMA RETIREMENT CORP
GREAT-WEST LIFE ASSURANCE
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - PERA
INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA
PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN OF MN
MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN
NATIONAL REGISTRY - EMT
CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION
AT&T
AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV
AT&T
PAPER WAREHOUSE
AT&T
NSP
VOID OUT CHECK
16.00
275.00
380.00
4.51
25513.87
720.00
3.70
24.00
22.00
84.55
6.00
1178.80
20.00
20.00
144.45
19.00
19.00
12550.73
32.00
18875.50
16.00
325.42
24.00
140.00
0.00
5260.59
367.80
6556.85
3112.08
8275.09
20.00
28.00
1164.50
32.00
15.00
38.00
25744.20
5797.03
988.48
3946.00
99.00
184.00
15140.61
5.00
18337.56
9150.10
15.00
927.00
352.51
78.92
352.51
18.50
1011.40
15741.57
0.00
SKI TRIP/FEES PAID
SKI TRIP-TRANSPORTATION-COMMUNITY SERVICES
SKI TRIP/FEES PAID
SUPPLIES-WINTER SKILL DEVELOPMENT
DECEMBER 87 SALES TAX
CONFERENCE-BUILDING DEPT
REFUND-SKATING LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-SKATING LESSONS
BEER
SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
WINE
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
CARBURETOR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
REFUND-SKATING LESSONS
REFUND-SKATING LESSONS
LIQUOR
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
WINE
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
BEER
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
CONFERENCE-FIRE DEPT
SERVICE
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
REFUND-SKATING LESSONS
REFUND-RACQUETBALL LESSONS
TRAINING SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
CONFERENCE-COMMUNITY CENTER
REFUND-SKATING LESSONS
PAYROLL-1/8/88
PAYOLL-1/8/88
PAYROLL 1/8/88
PAYROLL 1/8/88
PAYROLL 1/8/88
PAYROLL 1/8/88
PAYROLL 1/8/88
PAYROLL 1/8/88 .
PAYROLL 1/8/88 '
PAYROLL 1/8/88
TRAINING SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
PAYROLL 1/8/88
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
SERVICE
SERVICE
J317383
PACKET DELIVERIES
SKI TRIP-TRANSPORTATION-COMMUNITY SERVICES
SKI TRIP/FEES PAID
CONFERENCE-CITY MANAGER
WINE
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
CONFERENCE-CITY EMPLOYEES
EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
REFUND-OVERPAYMENT MECHANICAL PERMIT
STRAINER-WATER DEPT
SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
PLEXIGLAS-PARKS DEPT
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
CO BOND PAYMENT
DUES-PLANNING DEPT
DUES-POLICE DEPT
SIGNS/SUPPLIES- SIGNS/PARK MAINTENANCE
BULBS/TRANSISTOR/EQUIP REPAIR-WATER DEPT
-MASTER KEY LOCKS/INSTALLATION OF 6 PUSH
-BUTTON LOCKS-FIRE DEPT/KEY KNOB-POLICE
DEPT
SUPPLIES-ENGINEERING DEPT
REFUND-SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
LICENSE-COMMUNITY CENTER
CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
DUES-POLICE DEPT
DUES-POLICE DEPT
-SERVICE-TRAFFIC STUDY FOR EDEN PRAIRIE
AUTO MALL/PRAIRIE CENTER DR & VIKING DRIVE
EXPENSES-CITY HALL
VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
BATTERIES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE
-FILM PROCESSING-WATER DEPT/CORPORATION
-COUNCIL/ASSESSING DEPT/POLICE DEPT/
FORESTRY DEPT/PLANNING DEPT
EQUIPMENT PARTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
BLDG REPAIR-PARKS BUILDING
MIXER REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER
SERVICE-FIRE STATIONS #3 & #4
CEMENT DRILL BIT-STREET MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT REPAIR-PARK MAINTENANCE
BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE-POLICE DEPT
-EQUIPMENT REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER
SWIMMING POOL
-SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW ROAD/5 & COUNTY RD
4 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
FEBRUARY 2,1988
40179 DANA GIBBS
40180 CONSOLIDATED COACHES
40181 WELCH VILLAGE
1182 MAKATO STATE UNIVERSITY
40183 EAGLE WINE CO
40184 GRIGGS COOPER & CO
40185 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
40186 PAUSTIS & SONS
40187 ED PHILLIPS & SONS
40188 PRIOR WINE CO
40189 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS
40190 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
40191 PETTY CASH-PUBLIC SAFETY
40192 CMS
40193 A & H WELDING & MFG CO
40194 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC
40195 ALLIED PLASTICS INC
40196 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO
40197 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK & TRUST
40198 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
40199 ASSOC OF MN EMERGENCY MANAGERS
40200 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC
40201 AQUATROL CORPORATION
40202 ARMOR SECURITY INC
40203 ARTSIGN MATERIALS CO
40204 ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH
205 ASCAP
,J206 ASPLUND COFFEE CO INC
40207 ASIS
40208 ATOM
40209 B R W INC
40210 BACHMANS
40211 JEFF BARTZ
40212 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC
40213 KELLY LYN BAUER
40214 BIFFS INC
40215 BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY
40216 SAM BLOOM IRON & METAL CO INC
40217 BLOOMINGTON LOCK & SAFE
40218 BMB SERVICES
40219 BRAUN ENG TESTING INC
40220 BROCK WHITE CO
40221 BRUNSON INSTRUMENT CO
40222 CHARLES BUSCH
40223 FRANCIE BUTORAC
40224 CENTRAIRE INC
40225 CLIMATE MAKERS INC
'226 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORATION
99.00
270.00
490.00
40.00
1764.34
12298.71
15031.70
166.32
13753.86
552.39
6591.47
900.00
60.12
30.00
91.00
575.03
55.98
9.39
500.00
92.00
20.00
1364.74
156.68
2275.62
12.50
97.00
412.50
108.10
15.00
10.00
1675.25
22.75
334.00
289.09
121.50
534.15
263.22
20.10
86.40
30.00
2223.30
10.30
75.00
84.00
20.00
81.52
778.79
617.09
6510991
A
40227 COPY EQUIPMENT INC
40228 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS INC
1(
0229 CROWN MARKING INC
230 CRYSTAPLEX PLASTICS INC
0231 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY
40232 WARD F DAHLBERG
40233 bAKTRONICS INC
40234 DALCO
40235 CRAIG DAWSON
40236 MONICA M DAY
40237 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
40238 DIXIE PETRO-CHEM INC
40239 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU
40240 W J EBERTZ CO
40241 THE ECONOMICS PRESS INC
40242 EDEN PRAIRIE APPLIANCE
40243 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
40244 EDEN PRAIRIE TRASHTRONICS
40245 CITY OF EDINA
40246 ELECTRIC SERVICE CO
40247 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC
40248 JEFFREY ELWELL
i 1 249 ENGCO GENERAL CONTRACTOR
250 CHRIS ENGER
40251 JOHN ESS & SONS INC
40252 FEED RITE CONTROLS INC
40253 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN
40254 FITNESS ASSOCIATES INC
40255 FLAHERTYS HAPPY TYME CO
40256 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY
40257 FOX MCCUE & MURPHY
40258 MICHAEL D FRANZEN
40259 G & K SERVICES
40260 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS CO
40261 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC
40262 GROSS OFFICE SUPPLY
40263 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC
40264 HACH CO
40265 CHRIS HAGE
40266 BRAD HANSEN
40267 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC
110841
-SUPPLIES/PRINTING-PLANNING DEPT/
ENGINEERING DEPT
-DECEMBER 87 & JANUARY 88 INSURANCE
CONSULTANT
SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
PLEXIGLASS SHIELDS-ICE ARENA
QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT
DECEMBER 87 EXPENSES
EQUIPMENT REPAIR/LAMPS-COMMUNITY CENTER
CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT/POLICE DEPT
EXPENSES-ADMINISTRATION
EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER
-FEE FOR DNR APPROPRIATION PERMIT-1987
WATER USE
LIQUID CHLORINE-WATER DEPT
SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
-SERVICE-HOMEWARD HILLS PARK/WILLOW PARK/
EDEN LAKE PARK
-SUBSCRIPTION/TRAINING SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/
POLICE DEPT
-DRYER REPAIR-FIRE DEPT/REFRIGERATOR
REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER
EXPENSES-CITY MANANGER
DECEMBER 87 TRASH DISPOSAL
DECEMBER 87 WATER TESTS
-OCTOBER 87 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE-CIVIL
DEFENSE SIRENS
-NITROGEN DIOXIDE/CARBON MONOXIDE-
COMMUNITY CENTER
EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER
SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER RENOVATION
DECEMBER 87 EXPENSES
-FURNISH & INSTALL SODIUM FIXTURE & TIME
SWITCH-EDENVALE PARK
CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT
TRAINING SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT
STRESS TESTS-POLICE DEPT/FIRE DEPT
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
1987 AUDIT SERVICE
EXPENSES-PLANNING DEPT
-TOWELS/COVERALLS-WATER DEPT/PARK
MAINTENANCE/LIQUOR STORE
FOLDING TABLES-COMMUNITY CENTER
DUES/FEES PAID .
SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT
-PHOTO CELL CONNECTION REPAIR-STARING LAKE
-PARK/WIRE BARN & SITE HOCKEY LITES-
HOMEWARD HILLS PARK
LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT
BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-BLUFFS EAST 4TH ADDITION/SUNNYBROOK ROAD
-INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL WATERMAIN/NEMEC
-KNOLLS/HOMEWARD HILLS PARK/EDEN LAKE PARK/
-
81.30
910.00
19.15
110.00
1653.37
80.00
89.11
170.21
28.00
100.00
500.00
799.00
579.28
21064.16
130.54
93.85
12.00
440.00
136.00
1983.00
82.73
30.00
18083.00
165.00
305.00
1060.00
60.73
3019.00
368.10
403.96
1500.00
13.50
455.93
779.81
90.00
108.80
8313.35
106.95
88.00
40.50
10055.08
-WILLOW PARK/PIONEER TRAIL & CO ROAD 18/
FRANLO ROAD/HAMILTON ROAD
LIMESTONE-STREET MAINTENANCE
TIMBERS/DEAD BOLT-HOMEWARD HILLS PARK BLDG
CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT
WASTE DISPOSAL-FORESTRY DEPT
POSTAGE-VOTER REGISTRATION VERIFICATION
FILING FEE-ENGINEERING DEPT
SCHOOLS-POLICE DEPT
DUES-POLICE DEPT
DECEMBER 87 BOOKING FEE
EQUIPMENT REPAIR/SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT
FREIGHT FOR FORK LIFT-PARK DEPT
INSTALL WATER TANK-ICE ARENA
SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-POLICE DEPT
TRANSPORTATION-COMMUNITY SERVICES
DUES/SUBSCRIPTION-ASSESSING DEPT
DUES-POLICE DEPT
FEBRUARY 88 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
-JANUARY 88 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY
HALL/POLICE DEPT
JANUARY 88 JANITORIAL SERVICE-CITY HALL
-SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT/SEWER DEPT/STREET
MAINTENANCE
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-TIMBERS/SHEET METAL/LOCKS-CITY HALL/
PARK DEPT
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
DUES/EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
BUILDING MAINTENANCE-LIQUOR STORE
DUES-FIRE DEPT
JANUARY 88 EXPENSES
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
-WIPER/BEARINGS/CUPS/CARTRIDGES/PINS/
HANDLES/FORESTRY DEPT
-LEGAL SERVICE-OCTOBER 87 & NOVEMBER 87 &
-DECEMBER 87 LANDFILL/OCTOBER 87-
COMMUNITY CENTER
DUES-COUNCIL
DUES-CITY HALL
COVERALLS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
DUES-COMMUNITY SERVICES
DECEMBER 87 LEGAL SERVICE
AIR HOSE/COUPLINGS-WATER DEPT
-2 COMPUTERS/3 PRINTERS/INSTALLATION -
POLICE DEPT
INSTALL NEW TANK/PARTS-ICE ARENA
OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT
-SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT/POLICE DEPT/CITY MAPS-
CITY HALL
DUES-CIVIL DEFENSE
40268 HARDRIVES
40269 HAUENSTEIN & BURMEISTER INC
40270 HELLERS CARBONIC WEST INC
)271 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
40272 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
40273 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
40274 HENNEPIN CTY CHIEFS OF POLICE
40275 HENNEPIN CTY CHIEFS OF POLICE ASS
40276 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT
40277 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT
40278 HOLMES FREIGHT LINES INC
40279 HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC
40280 HUDSON MAP COMPANY
40281 ICMA
40282 THE IDENTI KIT CO INC
40283 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #272
40284 INTL ASSOC OF ASSESSING OFFICERS
40285 INTL ASSOC OF LAW ENFORCEMENT
40286 IBM CORPORATION
40287 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC
40288 ISS INTER SERVICE SYSTEM
40289 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC
40290 CARTER F JOADWINE
40291 JUSTUS LUMBER CO
40292 TOM KLITZKE
1293 MOLLY KOIVUMAKI
i294 MARY KOTTKE
40295 LAKELAND CARPET & UPHOLSTERY CLEA
40296 LAKE REGION MUTUAL AID ASSOC
40297 ROBERT LAMBERT
40298 LANCE
40299 LANDCO HANSEN EQUIPMENT INC
40300 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD
40301 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES MAP PROGRAM
40302 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
40303 LEEF BROS INC
40304 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC
40305 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC
40306 MIKE MARUSHIN
40307 MASYS CORPORATION
40308 MCQUIRE & SONS PLBG & HTG
40309 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO
40310 METRO PRINTING INC
40311 MEMA
2175.35
3770.55
944.89
162.50
44.66
36.00
1375.00
80.00
229.23
198.29
62.03
500.00
38.85
29.85
408.00
2525.45
110.00
90.00
467.51
531.62
1160.00
861.59
40.00
531.42
196.00
45.00
82.50
450.00
10.00
204.25
41.90
166.95
10243.23
221.00
3880.00
83.75
135.00
2509.43
68.00
5000.00
1003.44
43.95
2000.00
25.00
4278219
40312
40313
4 0314
I )315
40316
40317
40318
40319
40320
40321
40322
40323
40324
40325
40326
40327
40328
40329
40330
40331
40332
40333
40334
40335
40336
40337
40338
40339
( '1 340
METRO SYSTEMS FURNITURE
METROPOLITAN FIRE EQUIP CO
METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION
MID AMERICA BUSINESS SYTEMS &
MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO
MN IMPROVED JUVENILE JUSTICE
MPLS AREA CHAPTER
MN ANIMAL CONTROL ASSOCIATION
MN ASSOC OF ASSESSING OFFICERS
MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT
MN CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO
MINNESOTA CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
MN CRIME PREVENTION OFFICERS ASSN
MINNESOTA DAILY
MN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE
MN POLICE & PEACE OFFICERS ASSN
MN RESCUE & FIRST AID ASSN
MN MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORES INC
MN SAFETY COUNCIL
MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSN
MN STREET SUPERINTENDENT ASSN
MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC
MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP
M-V GAS COMPANY
R G MODEEN INC
MOHAWK BUSINESS RECORDS STORAGE
MOODYS INVESTORS SERVICE
MOTOROLA INC
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
40341 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN
40342 NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER
40343 NATIONAL FIRE & ARSON REPORT
40344 NCR CORPORATION
40345 W E NEAL SLATE CO
40346 NORTHERN HYDRAULICS
40347 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
40348 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC
40349 ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO INC
40350 PADGETT-THOMPSON
40351 RICK PALMER
40352 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO
40353 PENNSYLVANIA OIL CO
40354 POMMER COMPANY INC
40355 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC
40356 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
40357 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
FEBRUARY 2,1988
40358 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN
,59 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC
BOOKCASE-ASSESSING DEPT
FIRE EXTINQUISHERS-FIRE DEPT
FEBRUARY 88 SEWER SERVICE
SERVICE ON MICROFICHE-FINANCE
CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
DUES-POLICE DEPT
FILM RENTAL/SUPPLIES-POOL
DUES-POLICE DEPT
DUES-ASSESSING DEPT
PRINTS-ENGINEERING DEPT
SERVICE
UNIFORMS-FIRE DEPT
DUES-POLICE DEPT
EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES
SERVICE-SNOWMOBILE SAFETY COURSE
DUES-POLICE DEPT
DUES-FIRE DEPT
CONFERENCE-LIQUOR STORES
DUES-ADMINISTRATION
DUES-FIRE DEPT
DUES-STREET DEPT
ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES
SERVICE
GAS-SENIOR CENTER
PAINTING GARAGE-POLICE DEPT
SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
BOND PAYMENT
EQUIPMENT REPAIR-FIRE DEPT
-THERMOSTAT/WATER PUMP-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES
SUBSCRIPTION-WATER DEPT
SUBSCRIPTION-FIRE DEPT
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 88-COMMUNITY CENTER
SUPPLIES-PARKS DEPT
SUPPLIES- FIRE DEPT
4TH QUARTER 87 SERVICE
-3 PRINTERS/I KELLY RAM-FINANCE DEPT/
I PRINTER-ENGINEERING DEPT
SERVICE
CONFERENCE-ADMINISTRATION
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
OIL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
VOLLEYBALL TROPHIES-COMMUNITY SERVICES
-1/4 HP MOTOR/EQUIPMENT REPAIR-COMMUNITY
CENTER
XMAS LIGHTS/GARLAND-LIQUOR STORE
-HAMMER/SCREWDRIVERS/BUSHINGS/SNOW SHOVEL/
-V-BELT/BOLTS/BULBS/BATTERIES/SPRAY PAINT/
-BULBS/KEYS/SCREWS/CAN OPENER/TOWEL HOLDER
-DOOR STOP/RULER/PLUGS/PAINT THINNER/PUTTY
KNIVES
REPAIR SNOWBLOWER-FIRE & POLICE BUILDING
HEAD SET-PLANNING DEPT
227.38
101.50
136607.35
126.83
483.05
15.00
150.00
20.00
375.00
203.82
67.75
102.00
25.00
99.60
70.00
495.00
50.00
160.00
86.00
115.00
15.00
439.30
55.25
240.50
789.00
27.75
4000.00
229.44
279.19
615.12
8.00
24.00
706.00
40.00
48.88
55.69
1743.00
268.00
65.00
42.00
427.50
261.00
177.00
313.35
15.64
218.25
35.28
38.23
15075765
FBRUARY 2,1988
40360 PREFERRED IMAGE -TAPE/CAPS/JACKETS/AWARD PLAQUES-COMMUNITY
CENTER
1(
0361 PRENTICE-HALL INC
SUBSCRIPTION-ADMINISTRATION
362 PRENTICE-HALL INC SUBSCRIPTIONS-FORESTRY DEPT
0363 PRICE PRO SPORTING GOODS -RACQUETBALLS/PUMP/NEEDLES-ORGANIZED
ATHLETICS
40364 PRINTERS SERVICE INC -CHIPPER KNIVES SHARPENED-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
40365 PSQ BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS INC -DECEMBER 87/JANUARY 88/FEBRUARY 88
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL
40366 R & R SPECIALTIES INC EQUIPMENT REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER
40367 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC -ROWLAND ROAD FEASIBILITY/TECHNOLOGY DR/
-HIDDEN GLEN 3RD ADDITION/WYNDHAM KNOLL/
-PRAIRIE VIEW DRIVE/RIVER VIEW ROAD/RIVER
-VIEW DRIVE/MITCHELL ROAD FEASIBILITY/
WYNDHAM CREST/SHADY OAK RIDGE
40368 SOUTHWEST FIRE LEAGUE DUES-FIRE DEPT
40369 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER
40370 KEN SERDAR BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
40371 SEXTON DATA PRODUCTS SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
40372 STEVEN R SINELL JANUARY 88 EXPENSES
40373 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP -PULLER PRESS/BRAKE TOOL/CUTTERS/PLIERS/
-DRIVER COVER/PUNCH SETS/PUNCH/CHISEL/
-LITE/GAUGE-STREET MAINTENANCE/EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
40374 SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COU SERVICE
40375 SOUTHTOWN PLUMBING INC INSTALLATION OF WATER FOUNTAIN-FIRE DEPT
40376 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING CO -ADVERTISING-LIQUOR/EMPLOYMENT ADS-
HUMAN RESOURCES
377 STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH INC SERVICE-WOODDALE CHURCH
40378 STS CONSULTANTS LTD SERVICE-WATER PLANT ADDITION
40379 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK SIGN-LIQUOR STORE
40380 SUPERIOR WOOD PRODUCTS CABINET-COMMUNITY CENTER
40381 NATALIE SWAGGERT EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES
40382 TARGET 220 SUPPLIES-HOLIDAY SALUTE-COMMUNITY CENTER
40383 TEAM LABORATORY CHEMICAL CORP CHEMICALS-SEWER DEPT
40384 THOMPSON PLUMBING REFUND-PLUMBING PERMIT
40385 THOMPSON PLUMBING REFUND-PLUMBING PERMIT
40386 TRI STATE DRILLING REFUND-WATER METER DEPOSIT
40387 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO ACETYLENE GAS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
40388 TWIN CITY TESTING SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER LITIGATION
40389 VESSCO INC FEEDER BELT SLAKER-WATER DEPT
40390 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE INC GAS CYLINDERS-COMMUNITY CENTER
40391 (AR! A WAHL MILEAGE
40392 KEITH WALL EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
40393 LYNNETTE R WEISGRAM VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
40394 WILSON TANNER GRAPHICS SUPPLIES-PARK DEPT/CITY HALL
40395 X-ERGON -SAFETY GLASSES/CAPE SLEEVE/FACE SHIELD-
WATER DEPT
40396 JIM ZALESKY VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
40397 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE -FIRST AID SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER/
602.20
22.11
41.87
135.54
17.92
1465.50
49.95
11651.67
25.00
14.05
182.00
54.31
211.00
531.80
981.00
34.58
702.50
530.72
581.56
1600.00
2488.00
99.21
78.32
1363.12
53.50
101.50
522.39
13.49
633.36
253.53
163.27
45.70
8.00
40.00
595.00
101.62
54.00
88.30
SKATING RINKS
40398 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSN
VOLLEYBALL/BASKETBALL-FEES PAID
1005.00
1'999 MC DONALDS
EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER
9.01
,31 VOID OUT CHECK
380.00-
2677160
FEBRUARY 2,1988
39897 VOID OUT CHECK
40034 VOID OUT CHECK
1092 VOID OUT CHECK
101 VOID OUT CHECK
40121 VOID OUT CHECK
40148 VOID OUT CHECK
40172 VOID OUT CHECK
-1423287
45.90-
19.61-
13568.16-
231.69-
15.00-
0.00-
352.51-
$528470.72
DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS
10 GENERAL 165980.88 LIQUOR STORE-P V M 77321.02
lk LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE 51350.52
31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP 34427.76
33 UTILITY BOND FUND 4569.48
39 86 FIRE STATION CONSTRUCT 2223.30
45 UTILITY DEBT FD ARB 500.00
51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 19973.96
57 ROAD IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 1203.62
73 WATER FUND 9068.83
77 SEWER FUND 138452.95
81 TRUST 8 ESCROW FUND 5315.40
87 CDBG FUND 18083.00
$528470.72
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
RE:
Mayor and City Council
Steve Durham, Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
January 27, 1988
Front Yard Setbacks on Corner Lots
Attached please find a report prepared for your review reg
a
r
d
i
n
g
f
r
o
n
t
y
a
r
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
on corner lots. The report highlights mitigative measures
b
u
i
l
t
i
n
t
o
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
corner lot setbacks, reasons for current Code and admi
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
C
o
d
e
,
a
survey of 8 surrounding communities, and their require
d
f
r
o
n
t
y
a
r
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
o
n
corner lots and a conclusion.
If the City Council determines the Code is restrictive
,
p
l
e
a
s
e
d
i
r
e
c
t
S
t
a
f
f
t
o
Investigate a Code amendment.
FRONT YARD SETBACKS FOR CORNER LOTS
In the R1 Zoning Districts, Eden Prairie requires a mini
m
u
m
f
r
o
n
t
y
a
r
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
f
r
o
m
the property line of 30'. In the case where lots have
t
w
o
o
r
m
o
r
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
,
the 30' front yard setback is required on all stree
t
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
.
D
e
c
k
s
,
p
o
r
c
h
e
s
,
breezeways, etc., are included in a building setback.
T
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
i
m
p
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
i
s
t
h
a
t
this requirement may be restrictive. However, listed
b
e
l
o
w
a
r
e
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
v
e
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
Incorporated in City Code to compensate for the 30' f
r
o
n
t
y
a
r
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
o
n
all street frontages and reasons for this requirement.
Mitigative Measures:
1.) City Code Chapter 12 requires corner lots to have ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
w
i
d
t
h
o
f
a
t
least 15' wider than the minimum width required by t
h
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
c
h
a
p
t
e
r
.
I
n
no case shall the width be less than 90'.
Example #1 - In the R1-9.5 Zoning District the minimum lot width
i
s
7
0
'
.
A
t
the time of platting the lot minimum width required by
C
o
d
e
i
s
9
0
'
.
O
n
l
y
i
n
Instances where variances are given for lots less than
9
,
5
0
0
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
d
o
problems develop in placement of a home. This is r
a
r
e
.
A
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
a
l
s
o
develops when a builder places siding glass doors fac
i
n
g
a
f
r
o
n
t
y
a
r
d
b
u
t
does not construct a deck with initial construction. Th
e
h
o
m
e
o
w
n
e
r
t
h
e
n
h
a
s
the problem of placing a deck in a front yard. In addit
i
o
n
m
o
s
t
l
o
t
s
e
x
c
e
e
d
9,500 square feet making the lot width and depth grea
t
e
r
t
h
a
n
t
h
e
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
code requirements.
' 306 of ;
/6 86/L0/10/4F
s-
1 ifT70 of r :
I Butc.060i;
I yi7 0F /.4re
• —
100'
Street Frontage
The extra 30' of lot width required at the time of pl
a
t
t
i
n
g
i
s
o
f
f
s
e
t
t
h
e
required 30' front yard setback.
Example #2 - In the R1-13.5 Zoning District the minimum lot width
i
s
8
5
'
.
A
t
the time of platting the minimum lot width required by
C
o
d
e
i
s
1
0
0
'
.
I
n
m
o
s
t
cases, the lot widths are larger than 100' to accompli
s
h
t
h
e
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
l
o
t
s
i
z
e
of 13,500 square feet. Street Frontage ---,
0 M.er
0
0011G
4.1
vn I -0 ml
100'
Street Frontage
ooL 17;71
0
5
,011 1 L.N.PV0c.
OcIAC Street Frontage G011 401011^
70' 135 85'
Street Frontage
v-0
r-- - - - -1 i yqn. ,,f ih.r
I S IN,ItA Mlle
.. ,
-F I I
I I
5
a
18r.
IS I ,, Street Frontage I r1aLtr I I •5 lion.0,1724;
15 SI
I •
I
135' 85'
The extra 15' of lot frontage is to
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
3
0
'
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
.
2.) Corner lots do not usually have a r
e
a
r
y
a
r
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
o
f
their configuration. If the lot h
a
s
t
w
o
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
,
t
h
e
r
e
a
r
e
t
h
e
n
two side yard setbacks. (Note exam
p
l
e
s
a
b
o
v
e
)
.
B
y
n
o
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
i
n
g
2
0
'
r
e
a
r
yard setback on corner lots, an addi
t
i
o
n
a
l
5
'
o
f
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
i
s
g
a
i
n
e
d
.
Reason for Code
The City Code definition of a corne
r
l
o
t
i
s
"
a
l
o
t
s
i
t
u
a
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
n
d
fronting on two or more streets". B
y
v
i
r
t
u
e
o
f
t
h
e
d
e
f
i
n
i
t
i
o
n
a
n
y
l
o
t
w
h
i
c
h
h
a
s
t
w
o
or more streets is required to hav
e
a
3
0
'
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
.
S
t
a
f
f
i
n
t
h
i
s
c
a
s
e
i
s
not at liberty to interpret differen
t
l
y
.
The required 30' front yard setbac
k
a
l
s
o
a
p
p
l
i
e
s
t
o
a
c
c
e
s
s
o
r
y
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
.
T
h
i
s
prevents the location of detached g
a
r
a
g
e
s
,
s
h
e
d
s
,
p
o
o
l
s
e
t
c
.
.
.
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
front yard setback. If these struc
t
u
r
e
s
w
e
r
e
p
e
m
i
t
t
e
d
i
n
a
f
r
o
n
t
y
a
r
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
,
adjacent property owners could h
a
v
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
p
l
a
c
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
i
r
required front yard setback ( note ex
a
m
p
l
e
b
e
l
o
w
)
.
GROACE
1•40.01n04-.4.0.04
The required 30 front yard setbacks
m
a
k
e
s
a
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
C
o
d
e
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
i
z
e
d
.
Staff is not put in the position of d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
i
n
g
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
a
f
r
o
n
t
y
a
r
d
a
n
d
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
a
side yard setback. The Code gives t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
f
l
e
x
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
i
n
l
o
c
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
literal front of a home on either str
e
e
t
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
.
Survey of Surrounding Community Code
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
o
r
n
e
r
L
o
t
s
Burnsville
The front yard setback is 30. On a
c
o
r
n
e
r
l
o
t
t
h
e
l
i
t
e
r
a
l
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
h
o
m
e
f
a
c
i
n
g
a street frontage requires a minimum
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
o
f
2
5
'
.
Eagan
The front yard setback is 30. On a c
o
r
n
e
r
l
o
t
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
h
o
m
e
f
a
c
i
n
g
a
s
e
c
o
n
d
Street frontage also requires a 30' s
e
t
b
a
c
k
.
Minnetonka
The front yard setback is 35'. On a
c
o
r
n
e
r
l
o
t
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
h
o
m
e
f
a
c
i
n
g
a
s
e
c
o
n
d
street frontage requires a 25' front
y
a
r
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
.
Plymouth
The front yard setback is dependen
t
u
p
o
n
t
h
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
.
I
n
a
s
i
n
g
l
e
f
a
m
i
l
y
district the required setbacks are
2
5
'
o
r
3
5
'
.
O
n
a
c
o
r
n
e
r
l
o
t
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
h
o
m
e
facing a second street frontage is 2
5
'
o
r
3
5
'
,
d
e
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
o
n
t
h
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
.
Apple Valley
The front yard setback is 30'. On a
c
o
r
n
e
r
l
o
t
t
h
e
l
i
t
e
r
a
l
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
h
o
m
e
f
a
c
i
n
g
a second street frontage requires a
2
0
'
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
.
Edina
The front yard setback is dependen
t
u
p
o
n
t
h
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
.
I
n
s
i
n
g
l
e
f
a
m
i
l
y
districts the required setbacks are
3
0
'
o
r
3
5
'
.
O
n
a
c
o
r
n
e
r
l
o
t
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
home facing a second street front
a
g
e
i
s
3
0
'
o
r
3
5
'
,
d
e
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
o
n
t
h
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
district.
Bloomington
The front yard setback is 30'. On a
c
o
r
n
e
r
l
o
t
t
h
e
l
i
t
e
r
a
l
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
h
o
m
e
f
a
c
i
n
g
a second street frontage requires a
3
0
'
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
.
Eden Prairie
The front yard setback is 30'. On a
c
o
r
n
e
r
l
o
t
t
h
e
l
i
t
e
r
a
l
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
h
o
m
e
f
a
c
i
n
g
a second street frontage requires a
3
0
'
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
.
Conclusion - Eden Prairie's City Cod
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
3
0
'
f
r
o
n
t
y
a
r
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
f
o
r
all structures facing a second, thir
d
,
o
r
f
o
u
r
t
h
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
i
s
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
Codes of Minnetonka, Plymouth, Edina
,
a
n
d
B
l
o
o
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
d
o
e
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
t
h
a
t
corner lots plat with larger widths
t
o
c
o
m
p
e
n
s
a
t
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
3
0
'
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
.
Administration of a 30 , front yard setback on all street
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
r
e
m
o
v
e
s
C
i
t
y
Staff from additional Code inter
p
r
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
F
i
n
a
l
l
y
t
h
e
3
0
'
f
r
o
n
t
y
a
r
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
otects property owners adjacent to co
r
n
e
r
l
o
t
s
f
r
o
m
h
a
v
i
n
g
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
i
n
l
i
n
e
w
i
t
h
heir required front yard setbacks.
Northern States Power Company
414 Nicollel Mall
Minneapolis Minnesota 55401
Telephone 16121 330.5500
January 27, 1988
Mr. Carl Jullie, Manager
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Re: Condemnation TL Westgate Bluff Creet
Line 5516 Hennepin County
NSP vs. William McCubrey, et al.
Parcels 20 and 2L - City of Eden Prairie
Dear Mr. Jullie:
This letter is written to clarify the negotiations between
Northern States Power Company and the City of Eden Prairie
relating to the proposed construction of a 115 kV electric
transmission line adjacent to the northerly limits of
Minnesota Trunk Highway No. 5 from the Company's Westgate
Substation adjacent to the Chicago and North Western
Transportation Company railroad right of way to your City's
west corporate limits.
As you know, this route was chosen jointly by the Cities of
Chanhassen and Eden Prairie because it followed an established
corridor through both cities. At no cost to the City of Eden
Prairie, Northern States Power Company will be removing numer-
ous wood poles supporting an existing overhead electric dis-
tribution system, and will replace said distribution system
with an underground line in certain areas of your City and
will suspend said distribution system from the new steel pole
transmission system in other areas. You will certainly agree
that the net effect will be to enhance the esthetic appeal of
the utility system in this area, since the number of steel
poles is substantially less than the present number of wood
poles.
In addition, this line will provide a second source capability
to the Company's Westgate Substation which will greatly
improve the reliability of electric service to the entire City
of Eden Prairie. You are certainly aware of the growing
requirements for electric service in your City which this
transmission line will support.
-3(Jc)
Mr. Carl Jullie, Manager
January 27, 1988
Page 2
Northern States Power Company has worked cooperatively with
your staff in the placement of each steel pole along the
route. We have fully complied with every applicable provision
of your Zoning Code and have proceeded with the installation
of foundations for these steel pole structures in a timely
manner in reliance upon the permission received by your Board
of Appeals and Adjustments (Final Order dated January 8, 1987)
and as well as your City Council (Minutes of City Council
meeting of Tuesday, November 18, 1986, Item VII, pages 7-9).
Foundation installation is the first phase of this construc-
tion project, and will be followed shortly by the installation
of the steel poles on these foundations. As additional right
of way becomes available for construction through the condem-
nation process, additional foundations and poles will be
constructed, which in turn, will be followed by stringing the
lines from pole to pole.
The easements acquired by NSP for this line will encumber
numerous parcels of land in Eden Prairie, Chanhassen and
beyond. As you know, The City of Eden Prairie owns two par-
cels of land which will be crossed by this transmission line.
They are identified in the condemnation proceeding as Parcels
2B and 2L. As an affected landowner, the City has received a
registered mail notice of the commencement of the condemnation
proceeding. More recently, it has been served with a Notice
of Hearing on Petition and Notice of Motion and Motion for
Order Transferring Title and Possession of Easements to
Petitioner as of March 2, 1988.
NSP is sincerely interested in concluding its negotiations
with the City for the acquisition of the necessary easements
over and across Parcels 2B and 2L. As you know, NSP is offer-
ing $20,000 to the City for the easements across both of said
Parcels 2B and 2L. As we have discussed many times, and most
recently on Monday, January 25, 1988, there will be no poles
on Parcel 2B. We are both aware that said Parcel 2B is low
wet ground and that NSP's transmission line will not conflict
with any present or future use of said land by the City.
Parcel 2L will have two poles located South of the walking
path adjacent to the northerly right of way of Highway No. S.
Again, these two poles will not conflict with any present or
future plans of the City. The offer of $20,000 is based upon
reliable information which we obtained as to what willing buy-
ers pay willing sellers for land in this area.
3 / 0
Mr. Carl Jullie, Manager
January 27, 1988
Page 3
We are most anxious to acquire the easements across these two
parcels of land well in advance of the date of the hearing in
Hennepin County District Court on February 17, 1988. Toward
that end, we urge you to place on the agenda of the City
Council meeting on Tuesday, February 2, 1988, the matter of
the approval by the Council of said easements and a resolution
authorizing appropriate City personnel to execute said
easements and deliver same to the undersigned.
Yours very truly,
e--V0-124
Robert E. Koltes
m35-37
cc: Roger Pauly
3id,1
RORER I 1 !ANC;
ROGER A PAI. L1
04011) H GRLGERSON
RICHARD F ROMA
MARK 1 JOHNSON
JOSEPH A 511.15
JOHN K LANG
DIANA P MASSIE
LEA M DE SOUZA
LANG,PAULY&GREGERSONATD.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4108 IDS CENTER
80 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE: (612) 338-0755
January 27, 1988
EDEN PRAIRIE OEFIE
230 SEER ROAN 55111)5 51 HANK
1141 PR 41RIt I (NUR DRI1E
EDEN PRAIRIE. 111NNESOF 11344
(61:18294),5
REPLY 70 MINNEAME6 WERT
Mr. Carl Jullie
City Manager
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677
RE: Northern States Power Company vs. City of Eden Prairie,
et al.
Dear Carl:
I have been advised by John Frane that NSP has now served the
City with notice of the commencement of condemnation proceedings
which includes certain property owned by the City. The hearing
on the petition is scheduled for February 17, 1988. As I indi-
cated to you in my letter dated November 19, 1987, I believe
there is significant legal authority which indicates that NSP
would not have the right to condemn property owned and used by
the City. In order for the City to resist the attempted condem-
nation of its property, an appearance will be necessary on
February 17, 1988.
I know that you have been dealing with representatives of NSP
with regard to the placing of the power line over City property.
Please let me know at your earliest convenience whether we should
prepare for appearance at the February 17 hearing in opposition
to the condemnation of City property.
Sincerely,
Rbger A. Pauly
RAP:cw
RAP2 .078-1.1
P.S. If NSP cannot condemn the property, it would have to agree
to whatever terms the City would impose such as moving
the line at its expense rather than the City's, if that
becomes necessary
T C 'ea NSP EASEMENT - 2"W' P, T. • - `-`, 447' Ø.635' LT• '478' PROPOSED II5K V TRANSMISSION LINE - oo co HWY. R.W — 731.88' — SERVICE ROAD 520' STATE HWY. 4 5
NSP EASEMENT CLPROPOSED \J 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE OUTLOT C GONYEA 4TH ADDITION Thed4,441,4pe 314.' 105' 1-N y. R/6, vy
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
NATALIE SWAGGERT-DIRECTOR HUMAN SERVICES/RESOURCES
CRAIG DAWSON-ASSISTANT TO THE MANAGER
CARL J. JULLIE
JANUARY 28, 1988
1988 STRATEGIC PLAN-MISSION STATEMENT
Attached for your review and final discussion is a copy of the Mission
Statement and accompanying Goal Statements (see Attachment 1), developed for
the City as part of the Strategic Planning process.
Two versions of the Mission Statement are printed. The recommended statement
excludes the words "live, work and play", in an effort to keep the statement
somewhat shorter.
In addition, a plan to communicate the Mission Statement and Goal Statements
has been formulated. Additional alternatives have also been noted and are
Included on Attachment 2.
To assist in the decision process, included for reference in Attachment 3 and 4
are the Mission Statements of the Eden Prairie School District and the Eden
Prairie Chamber of Commerce.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that Council adopt one of the Mission Statements and the
supporting goal statements.
It is further recommended that the Council approve the proposed communication
plan.
ATTACHMENT 1
1988 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE STRATEGIC PLAN
MISSION STATEMENT:
Recommended version-
We are committed to the growth of Eden Pra
i
r
i
e
as a city of unique character where planning for the future and delivery
o
f
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
s
t
o
a
high-quality of life for all and a stron
g
s
e
n
s
e
o
f
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
P
r
i
d
e
through Excellence.
Alternate Version-
We are committed to the growth of Eden Pr
a
i
r
i
e
a
s
a
c
i
t
y
o
f
u
n
i
q
u
e
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
where people can live, work and play, an
d
w
h
e
r
e
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
f
o
r
t
h
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
delivery of public services contributes to
a
h
i
g
h
-
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
l
i
f
e
for all and a strong sense of community based on Pride th
r
o
u
g
h
E
x
c
e
l
l
e
n
c
e
.
MOTTO:
PRIDE THROUGH EXCELLEN
C
E
SUPPORTING GOAL STATEMENTS:
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES
Goal: to nave a well planned, abundant system of parks and op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
s
w
h
i
c
h
is safe and accessible by trails. Natural am
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
Outdoor uses should be diverse to appeal t
o
t
h
e
b
r
o
a
d
e
s
t
r
a
n
g
e
o
f
p
e
o
p
l
e
,
a
n
d
there should be on-going evaluation of t
h
e
c
h
a
n
g
i
n
g
n
e
e
d
s
f
o
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
passive uses.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Goal: To plan, encourage and support, res
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
,
t
i
m
e
l
y
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
h
i
c
h
integrates a range of housing options, c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
/
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
a
n
d
parks and open spaces.
TOWNTUN .
tTi .levalop a special downtown center that , will provide an active, bustling, central gathering point that is
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
a
i
n
f
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
,
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
t
o
the entire community, and lend a small-town feeling and opportunity for tradition.
TRANSPORTATION:
GUI; Develop an integrated transportation
s
y
s
t
e
m
e
m
b
o
d
y
i
n
g
h
i
g
h
w
a
y
s
,
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
(including buses, Rideshare, LRT)., and trail systems, all providing inter
n
a
l
circulation and access to and from the City
o
f
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
.
PUBLIC SAFETY
teal: To continue to have Eden Prairie kn
o
w
n
a
s
a
s
a
f
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
o
l
i
v
e
,
w
o
r
k
,
and play.
PUBLIC SERVICES
Goal: To ensure that essential and des
i
r
e
d
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
a
r
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
a
t
a
n
acceptable cost which lead toward a high-quality of life for all.
ATTACHMENT 2
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
COMMUNICATION PLAN
Statement and Supporting Goals
INITIAL COMMUNICATION
I. Press release: Eden Prairie News
Eden Prairie Sailor
2. Letters to specific audiences, including the following:
Chamber of Commerce, School Districts, Hennepin Technical
Institute, County Commissioner, and State Legislators.
3. Cable television
ON-GOING COMMUNICATION
1. Repeat Mission Statement in on-going publications of the
Happenings.
2. Communicate via cable bulletin board on a periodic basis.
3. Include in packets for new residents.
4. Publish in future Sun Community Directory utilizing the front
information section. Mission Statement should be combined
with schedule of Council, Commission and Board meeting dates.
5. Incorporate Mission Statement into the annual City map (1989
publication).
ADDITIONAL/ALTERNATIVE APPROACH
One-time mailing to all residents and businesses.
E
•- Frederick Wolf David Anderson) OA message from the superintendent DI Gerald 61cCov Or Judy Strickler Sl/pCloilf C2f:Jt—,t Execeeve Da,ctoy or Curocultan 6 instrucr)on amSchool Board Members Tine Eku)res David Anderson. Charruerscn June 3-0 1989 Claude Jonrscr. reasiher rr 199:3 Jack VahReurcutel C:s rs jihre 1':nz0 Frederick Wir,1 V he Crarttn r jure 3h. 1386 Kenneth ES,' V, .:ree 30 1989 Charles Reehli,n; jiine 39 1989 Darlene Viegner. Dhec tor June 30 1986 The Eden Prairie School Board normally meets at 730 p in on the thud Tnursday 0 every month ,11 the Central Administration Building 6100 School Road, unless other-wise posted The public is encouraged to attend Persons wiShing to Speak are ask( C1 to Cali the SupernterdentS office (937-1650). Cr the School Board Chairperson irs advance SO Mat time may be reser.ed The pnenomeral growth of tne Eder Prairie Schools dur•-,,- The past Ivs years nas :upened new doors This fail tIer Sling the oew 13315 of Eden Lake Ere-nlentary Amos; rnose cof.a•fog rnese duo-ow be a sraff ol Inure than s,..enty, ar-al 330 p11,5 s!,,dents ore C. fitly tea,..hers .11 he open.ng flea- CV30,S for the first erne in the drstrct as they in., our teaching staff At least sixty employees will be opening different doors as they transfer to a new work :ocatfon vathin the district APOrOxtrhately 550 kmdergartr ors -- the Class of the Year 2000— will be opening new doors in this district for Me first time as they Start their educational experience In District 272 An additional 550 students wril he opening doors in this district for the I irsi time They are students who are moving to Edcm Rrame arid ef-aoSing SCho0f5 Orstrct residents wri! have the uhpurr.inity In Octeber to create air:Nur:nal new doors for our sthdents when they w rri be asked to aisthoshr a re fshencurn for another elernentarY scho0i. an Inteffnediafe add riots to hie shun schnoi rhs1V-:, SC,Gdi and. Indergarlen cc ,f, T ff,s inoestf -.3ot ir 10e k.turf.: ol our yo0tf, :all signal our cont,a,1 cur1-!ntrrs2nt e.coilerf,if P,..ase take tne of.i.or.a.nfly to after, "at the a:1;1,1y intorositIon SVSSfOns this rail fegi,rdayrt tne district s oge pfan- ring and tazintirs reeds The district cunrinues to focus on its rnIssfon which can be summarized in three words, "Promote the Partnership." thle is tne substance 01 dour mission, the fallowing •5 the tut, statenient developed by a task force made up of rarents teache,s, staff, dern.,straters and Board fnem-berS The Mission of the Eden Prairie School District Promote the Partnership of Learners, Parents, Staff, and the Community by: • Respecting the dignity and v.orth o every member of the partnership • Encouraging the acceptance ot Challenge arid desire for lifelong learning • Providing a positive educational environment which thy partnership will thrrve • Contributing to the individual physical, intellectual, spoof ahC emotional veil being of the members of the partner shy Won't you loin us in Promoting the Partnership? Together we Can meet the challenges 0 the future' *Excerpt From 1987-88 School Calendar E iN3WHDVIIV SCh00 Board elections are held in May
23
1988 Board
of Directors
Fred Hoisington, president
Hoisington Group, Inc.
Norm Friedrichs, 1st vice president
Merchant 8 Gould, et at
Galen Vettner, 2nd vice president
McGladrey, Hendrickson 8 Pullen
Mike Hedrix. secretary/treasurer
Joan Carlson. past president
Vekich, Arkema & Co., Chartered
Sally Bowles, director
Eden Prairie Schools
Carl Jullie, director
City of Eden Prairie
Dale Sheveland, director
Hennepin Technical Centers
Bruce Bredesen, director
Cooperative Power
Charlotte Johnson, director
Edina Realty/Business Property
Jim Benshoof, , director
Benshool 8 Associates
Doug Larsen, director
Dector Electronics
Keith Anderson, director
American Family Insurance
Burdett Wessels, director
Corporate Risk Managers
Galen Cadle, director
Marquette Bank Eden Prairie
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
Marge Friedenchs
ATTACHMENT 4
Chamber of
Commerce
Singletree Building
11995 Singletree Lane, Suite 220
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
(612) 944-2830
MISSION STATEMENT
THE EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE IS
COMMITTED TO THE GROWTH OF ITS MEMBERS
AND TO LEADERSHIP IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF
THIS DYNAMIC, PROGRESSIVE COMMUNITY.
PURPOSE
The Eden Praise Chamber of Commerce is in business
to address responsively the needs of its members with
programs and protects specifically designed to
promote their growth and development as Eden Prairie
businesses
The Eden Prairie Chamber is further dedicated
to active leadership in the economic growth and
development of the community, addressing up front
issues and situations that affect that growth and
development.
GOALS FOR THE 1980s
• Effectively represent the business community to
facilitate change and growth from approximately
1200 businesses in 1984 to 1700 businesses in 1989.
• Monitor and interact on behalf of business with
governmental bodies that most directly affect Eden
Prairie and, develop, as appropriate, action plans
that involve the membership.
• Identify, research and develop action plans for at
feast one maior issue important 10 the business
community each ;ear.
• Encourage growth and development of the members and their businesses by identifying the
needs of the members and developing programs
and projects that meet those needs.
• Build identity recognition of Chamber and
community as being last growing, progressive and
responsive is needs of business and residents.
Excerpt From The 1987-88 Eden Prairie
Sun Community Directory
C
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CARL J. JULLIE
CITY MANAGER
NATALIE J. SWAGGERT
DIRECTOR HUMAN RESOURCES/SERVICES
JANUARY 29, 1988
1988 HUMAN SERVICES DIRECTORY
Attached is a copy of the new 1988 Human Services Directory for
your use.
The Directory, previously called the "Eden Prairie Information
Guide", has traditionally been distributed to service providers
and organizations involved at the information and referral level.
This year we are hoping to expand distribution to all residents
and businesses. This will help ensure that residents are able to
locate needed services through self-referral as well as through
the existing referral organizations.
Because the approved 1988 budget is based on the past limited
distribution, inadequate funds have been allocated to cover costs
associated with an all-resident mailing. The school district has
agreed to help share a portion of the costs, but approximately
$3,500.00 remains uncovered of the $7,000.00 needed for printing
and mailing.
The staff is recommending that the Council approve distribution
of the Human Services Directory to all residents and businesses,
and the additional funding of $3,500.00 be granted.
342-