HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 12/01/1987TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 1987
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
SPECIAL MEETING
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
6:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia
Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant
to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson,
Director of Human Resources & Services
Natalie Swaggert, and Recording Secretary
Sue Anderson
ROLL CALL
I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
II. REPORT ON COMPARABLE WORTH
III. ADJOURNMENT.
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 1987
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia
Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to
the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director
John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris
Enger, Director of Community Services
Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works
Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary
Sue Anderson
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING FEBRUARY 1988 AS "EDEN PRAIRIE LOVES ITS KIDS MONTH" Page 3025 (Resolution No. 87-322)
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
A. Special City Council meeting held Tuesday, November 3 1987 Page 3026
B. Regular City Council meeting held Tuesday, November 3 1987 Page 3031
City Council Agenda
- 2 - Tues.,December 1, 1987
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of Human Rights & Services Commission recommendation for Page 3047 Senior Community Services request
Authorize permit application for connection to MWCC Sanitary Page 3048 Sewer Interceptor for Fountain Place Apartments -TRisolution No. 87-319)
C. Authorize execution of Department of Natural Resources License to Page 3049 cross public waters for Fountain Place Apartments (Resolution T177320)
D. Change Order No. 1, Homeward Hills Road I.C. 52-033A Page 3050
E. Change Order No. 1, Hidden Glen 3rd Addition I.C. 52-102 Page 3052
F. Approval of License Agreement with Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Company for construction and maintenance of a 15-Inch watermain crossing railroad property on Valley View Road
G. Resolution declaring costs to be assessed and ordering preparation Page 3057 of supplemental 9 IS-TO-if-Assessment RoTrand setting hearing date for December 15 1987 (Resolution No. 87-314)
H. Final Plat Approval for Fountain Place Apartments (located north Page 3059 of Columbine Road and west of TH IT Resoluton No. 87-315
I. Authorize preparation of a feasibility study for drainage Page 3062 Improvements on Hamilton Road I.C. 52-131 (Resolution No 87-317)
J. Terex Loader "buy-back" Page 3065
K. Receive 100% Petition for Utility Improvements for Legion Park Page 3066 Addition & Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications, I.C. 52-133 (Resolution No. 87-321)
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. EASEMENT VACATION 87-10 VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS °MMUS 1, 2 AND 4, BLOCK 1, RAVEN RIDGE 3 711FiTition No. 87- ----
B. ROGER'S BODY SHOP by Roger L. Lindeman. Request for Zoning
Distrtict Change from Rural to 1-2 on 1.68 acres with variances
to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, and Preliminary Plat of
1.91 acres into one lot and road right-of-way for construction
of an auto body shop. Location: Highway #169 across from the
Hennepin County Vocational Technical School. (Ordinance No.
44-87 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 87-249 - Preliminary Plat)
Continued from September 15 and October 6, 1987
C. SHADY OAK RIDGE 2ND ADDITION by Joe Ruzic. Request for Zoning
District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 0.19 acres, Zoning
District Amendment within the R1-13.5 District on 2.88 acres and
Preliminary Plat of 3.08 acres into 4 single family lots.
Location: West of Old Shady Oak Road, north of Rowland Road.
(Ordinance No. 59-87 - Rezoning and Zoning District Amendment;
Resolution No. 87-292 - Preliminary Plat)
Page 3068
Page 2264 F
3069
Page 3088
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,December 1, 1987
Page 3094 D. JENKIN'S ADDITION by John Jenkins. Request for Zoning District
Change to R1-13.5 on 5.61 acres, and Preliminary Plat
of 5.61 acres into 2 lots and one outlot. Location: North of
Research Road, south of Ridgewood West. (Ordinance No. 60-87 -
Rezoning; Resolution No. 87-312 - Preliminary Plat)
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
VII. PETITIONS REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
IX. APPOINTMENTS
A. Appointment of member to Southwest Metro Transit Commission
(continued from November 1171 798E7)
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
B. Report of City Manager
1. Set Special City Council meeting to discuss Residents
Advisory Committee on City Administrative Offices Final
Report
2. Public Safety Department Changes
3. City Manager Salary Review
4. Per Diem for Councilmembers
C. Report of City Attorney
D. Report of Director of Planning
E. Report of Director of Community Services
F. Report of Director of Public Works
XI. NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Page 3101
Page 3108
Page 3112
Page 3113
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
NATALIE SWAGGERT
DIRECTOR HUMAN RESOURCES/SERVICES
DECEMBER 1, 1987
COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY RESULTS
On December 1, 1987, I will be presenting the results of Eden
Prairie's Comparable Worth Study, including the Pay Equity
analysis and recommendations. I have arranged to have John
Coskey, our consultant from Arthur Young, attend the meeting. He
will present the Pay Equity Report which he prepared for Eden
Prairie.
I am pleased to be able to report that the overall results
indicate only minor pay inequities in most cases. The under-paid
positions are comprised of both female and male incumbents. The
total cost for pay equity adjustments is just over 1% of payroll.
As has been common in the results of other cities we have job
classifications that appear to be overpaid; specifically in the
Public Works maintenance area and in the sworn officer positions
in Public Safety. Several recommendations have been developed to
handle these situations.
In recognition of the extended time frame that was needed to
complete the study, I will be providing each of you with a
detailed Comparable Worth Study Report. The report will be
delivered to you on Monday, November 30. The report includes a
copy of the State statute, an overview of the job evaluation
process used, the evaluation results, the pay equity analysis,
and a summary of the recommendations needed to bring parity to
our salary structure.
RESOLUTION NO. 87-322
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING FEBRUARY, 1988
AS 'EDEN PRAIRIE LOVES ITS KIDS' MONTH
I, Mayor Gary Peterson, of the City of Eden Prairie. Minnesota, do hereby
officially declare and proclaim the month of February, 1988 as 'Eden Prairie
Loves Its Kids" month (or 'Eden Prairie 0 Its Kids" month). It is to
commence on February 1st, and end February 29, 1988.
I hereby proclaim that:
The month of February, 1988, be dedicated to all of our kids in the
City of Eden Prairie ... from the newborn infants born, or kids
adopted, this very day to Eden Prairie couples, the toddlers,
preschoolers, nursery school kids, kindergarten kids, elementary
kids, kids in junior high at Central Middle school, students at
Eden Prairie High School, all private schools, and out of school
youth.
I hereby proclaim and encourage every resident, every parent, every church,
every school, every community club and organization, every employer and business
establishment In Eden Prairie, to take an active part in "Eden Prairie
Loves Its Kids" month.
I hereby encourage everyone in our City of Eden Prairie to join our hearts
together in a 100% community effort and team support to show our kids how much
they are loved and appreciated. Our goal will be an honest effort to try and
raise self-esteem, and hopefully, we will be able to reach the kids in our city
who have had far too many "hurts and struggles" in their young lives. Also, I
proclaim that the kids who are achieving success be highly complimented, and be
given special recognition for their accomplishments during the month of
February.
I hereby encourage every citizen of Eden Prairie to report any suspicions
of child abuse or neglect, the selling of alcoholic beverages to minors by any
local liquor establishment, or the dealing of drugs in our city, or the selling
of drugs by anyone to our kids, to please report your suspicions to the Eden
Prairie Public Safety Department (Tee. No.: 937-2700). They are always willing
to check it out, and proceed from there with appropriate action, if necessary.
I hereby proclaim that no monetary rewards or gifts be given to our kids in
conjunction with "Eden Prairie Loves Its Kids" month, other than the cost of
sponsoring a meal, contest, or activity in appreciation of our kids. I proclaim
that the gifts of love and feelings flow freely during this special month, such
as hugs, smiles, pats on the back, or loving words of expression and
encouragement, etc.
I hereby encourage everyone in Eden Prairie to become actively involved in
a community-wide effort of all the people of our City. We may not be the only
city in America dealing with struggling, hurting, and acting out kids, but let
it be recognized that we the people of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, U.S.A. will be
trying very hard to help some of our kids, instead of sitting back in shock and
amazement, and that February, 1988, will become known in our City as 'Eden
Prairie Loves Its Kids" month, and hopefully, some of the ideas, etc. from
February, will continue into the future years.
For further information on organizing activities for the month of February,
please call Dottie Ewert at 937-2923.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council this 1st day of December, 1987.
Mayor Gary D. Peterson
SEAL
John D. Frame, City Clerk
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
6:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and
Patricia Pidcock
City Manager Carl Jullie, Assistant to
the City Manager Craig Dawson, and
Recording Secretary Jodi Miller
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1987
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ROLL CALL: All members were present.
I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order.
Harris complimented Assistant City Manager Dawson on the
excellent memo he had prepared for the Council regarding
waste management.
DISCUSSION ON WASTE MANAGEMENT
Assistant City Manager Dawson summarized his memo of October
29th regarding waste management stating his memo focused on
the City's role in solid waste management. He said the
Metropolitan Council had adopted a three phase approach
which called for counties preparing policy plans and cities
achieving 16% recycling through source separation. Cities
questioned the success of source separation and Assistant
City Manager Dawson identified, in his memo, several issues
and alternatives relating to source separation and an
analysis of likely response to those issues from other
government agencies. He stated that the waste management
legislation changes every year, therefore, it has become
very confusing as to what the actual intent and impact of
the legislation is.
Mayor Peterson asked Assistant City Manager Dawson to
elaborate on "How to Direct Waste to a Facility", Page 2750D.
Dawson replied that the City had been reluctant to contract
with a hauler or group of haulers in the past because it was
then acting within a private enterprise market. He
questioned if the city, acting through a regulatory act, would
be within anti-trust restraints. He stated this would
require further legal analysis.
Harris asked Dawson how St. Louis Park is having such
success with their recycling program and how they are
,
City Council Minutes 2 November 3, 1987
handling apartments. Dawson stated their recycling program
is five to six years old so the residents are in the habit
of separating their recyclables. The City also provided
three separate containers for separation of wastes which
makes it easy for the residents (samples of which are in his
office). Dawson said St. Louis Park also has several yard
waste programs and that is a significant portion of their
program. Regarding apartment buildings, Dawson felt some of
the buildings had a storage room available for use and/or
recyclable waste was put in plastic bags by the dumpsters
on designated days.
Harris inquired whether there was any new information on the
Hennepin County Resolution on source separation. Assistant
City Manager Dawson stated he was not aware of any changes
in the resolution but that it would probably be considered
by the Metropolitan Council for redrafting next year. Harris
inquired as to the sentiments of the Metropolitan Council.
City Manager Jullie said he had had only informal discussion
regarding this, but with the new Chairman of the Council, he fel
it had changed its stand and was supportive of mechanical
separation. Dawson stated Eden Prairie has asked for some
flexibility in the recycling system to reflect what was best
for the individual cities. Anderson asked City Manager
Jullie if this City Council should go on record asking for
mechanical separation since it has the plant to accomplish
this. Anderson stated that since Eden Prairie has the
opportunity to do mechanical separation, should the Council
ask the County Commissioners for their help and support as
this system is a good alternative and will work wcll in Eden
Prairie.
Mayor Peterson said extraction of recyclables is the issue
prior to mechanical separation. He stated there were a
number of questions including:
1) How do you designate flow of waste?
2) What will happen to recyclable material in the next
one to five years?
3) What contractural relationship can the City enter
into?
He said the list of questions gets longer and longer and
these issues must be resolved first.
Anderson questioned why we should investigate further if the
answer to mechanical separation is no. Mayor Peterson
stated while that was true, it was improbable any agency
would say no to mechanical separation once it was
demonstrated to be a workable solution.
Pidcock said that the Council must keep in mind that at the
City Council Minutes 3 November 3, 1987
last Metropolitan Council hearing the comment was made that
Eden Prairie was doing nothing for recycling and the
Metropolitan Council questioned why.
Harris said she felt it was worthwhile to pursue acceptable
Options available. She said there were many questions
relating to this issue and that one does not preclude the
other.
Bentley asked about the market for recyclables and whether or
not it was a problem for source separation. He also said he
was in strong disagreement with the attitude of other levels
of government proposing to modify behavior and he felt that
was beyond the roll of government. He said government may
impose sanctions to force people to do something but source
separation should not be it. He also wondered where the 16% '
figure originated from. Assistant City Manager Dawson said
studies had been done by consultants for Hennepin County and
the Metropolitan Council which suggested 14% - 18% recycling
could realistically be attained through an aggressive,
successful program.
Bentley said he felt the Council should proceed on the basis
that Eden Prairie will use the Reuter facility as a
recycling facility and mount a campaign to both residents
and other levels of government that shows the wisdom of
utilizing mechanical separation. However, he also feels
the Council should have a contingency plan available. This
creates the question of how to handle haulers taking the
refuse to the designated facility. Assistant City Manager
Dawson said more legal advice would be needed on that issue.
City Manager Jullie said that given the Reuter facility is
there, he thinks its only natural that the waste generated
in the sourrounding area should go to that facility. He
stated a backup plan was necessary and that Woodlake and BFI
Sanitation expressed an interest in talking with the City
and he suspected they may propose a curbside program. He
also said Eden Prairie needed to keep its options open.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris that the City of
Eden Prairie pursue alternatives employing mechanical
separation of recyclables, explore ways the City may direct
its waste to the Reuter facility, influence policies or
legislation to expand definitions of what is recognized as
recycling, and provide more recycling opportunities focusing
first on residential generators before moving to business
generators.
Bentley said the Staff had recommended more legal
investigation/analysis and that he felt an alternative plan
to source separation must be laid out as a plan to fall back
on.
City Council Minutes 4 November 3, 1987
Mayor Peterson then clarified the motion on the table and
stated that the Metropolitan Council, )rot Hennepin County,
would be the major problem. Anderson asked who gave credit
for proper waste management, the Metropolitan Council or
Hennepin County. Assistant City Manager Dawson stated
credit came mainly from the Metropolitan Council, however,
Hennepin County does have some grants available for source
separation. He further stated that mechanical separation
would not qualify for grant reimbursement.
Harris said the Staff recommendations addressed the options
and their investigation determined the best direction for
the City. Therefore, the Council should feel comfortable
pursuing the staff recommendations.
Mr. Doug Reuter, Reuter, Inc., commented with respect to the
resolution adopted by Hennepin County stating it was more
than they had hoped for. He said the most significant part
of it was included in the last paragraph which stated the
waste master plan should be modified to include recycling by
mechanical separation. He said it was important because it
was in violation of the Waste Management Act, yet seven
people knew this and voted for it anyway. This vote sends a
clear message to the Metropolitan Council that the County
Board saw it would be difficult to accomplish the waste
management goals without including mechanical separation.
City Manager Jullie asked what would happen to Reuter, Inc.
If 16% source separation was accomplished. Mr. Reuter said
it would have an obvious financial affect on the firm
because they would not have as much material.
Bentley stated that the motion before the Council directed
the Staff to proceed along lines of their recommendations.
He asked Mr. Reuter if a separate resolution should be
drafted by the staff which would be supportive of what the
county action has been. Mr. Reuter stated that at this time
he would not recommend a resolution of this type. He
further stated that he felt Eden Prairie should go along
with the Metropolitan Council plan and start a source
separation program by January 1988. He said he was
confident that the master guide will be changed to include
mechanical separation in the future.
Bentley spoke to the issue of the feasibility of putting a
source separation program into place by January 1988 if the
Metropolitan Council was going to turn around and change the
plan. Mayor Peterson questioned what powers the
Metropolitan Council has to mandate their policies.
A discussion was also held on the compost issue and whether
Reuter, Inc. had received the lab report results rating the
City Council Meeting 5 November 3, 1987
burning of their pellets. Mr. Reuter stated the lab report
was not yet available.
Susan Varlamoff said she had spoken with both Nunn and
Keefe and they had expressed concern that there was no
source separation program in Eden Prairie. She also
questioned whether landfill expansion could be a problem and
said she felt the landfill expansion issue must be
addressed.
Bentley said the staff recommendation does address setting
up a source separation program and if the motion is adopted
the framework to establish such a program will be put
together and ready to go in the near future. Assistant City
Manager Dawson said the county ordinance requires a plan,
not the actual program, in place by January, 1988.
Harris asked if Eden Prairie is the only community not
currently engaged in an active recycling program. Assistant
City Manager Dawson said neither Bloomington, Minnetonka,
nor Hopkins were actively engaged in recycling either.
Anderson said much discussion had taken place and that the
Council had originally allowed Reuter, Inc. to come to the
community because that was a better alternative than
landfill or a burn plant and that the Metropolitan Council
should be notified of that. He said he felt behavior
modification was important because Eden Prairie residents
will not always live in this community. He feels behavior
must be modified because of our society and existing
conditions no longer allow for landfill. Consequently,
recycling is needed.
VOTE ON MOTION: Motion passed unanimously.
Further discussion was held on whether or not the City had
the authority to require biodegradable cartons be used
rather than plastic and what could or couldn't be done about
this on a local level. Discussion was also held on the
recycling of paper.
III. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:14 PM.
3:3'31)
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1987
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and
Patricia Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant
to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director
John D. Franc, Director of Planning
Chris Enger, Director of Community
Services Robert Lambert, Director of
Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and
Recording Secretary Jodi Miller
ROLL CALL: All members were present.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
City Manager Jullie requested the Council add Final Plat
Approval For Prairie View Center 2nd Addition Resolution No.
87-302 to the Consent Calendar as Item "0". He also
requested the Council strike Item "N", Eden Prairie Auto Mall
by Austin Companies, from the Consent Calendar. City
Manager Jullie distributed a replacement copy of the
Agreement Regarding Special Assessments relating to Item "F"
on the Consent Calendar.
Mayor Peterson amended the Agenda by adding the following two
items under Reports of Council Members:
1) Completed City Manager's Review Forms
2) Appointment of Council Member to City Manager's Review
Group
Pidcock requested a discussion be held regarding the traffic
situation at the intersection of Highway 169 and Anderson
Lakes Parkway under Reports of Council Members.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris to approve the
Agenda and Other Items of Business as published and amended.
Motion carried unanimously.
MINUTES
A. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, October 6, 1987
The following change was made to Page 8, Paragraph 9,
Item C, Sentence 1: change to read bikeway/hikeway.
City Council Minutes 2 November 3, 1987
Pidcock questioned whether Bentley or Harris made the
motion to approve the revised strategic plan schedule on
Page 13, Paragraph 5. Mayor Peterson instructed the
Recording Secretary review the original minutes on this.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to approve
the Minutes of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday,
October 6, 1987 as published and amended. Motion carried
unanimously.
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
Bentley questioned the meaning of item H, Page 2, Subd. 4.
City Attorney Pauly stated that the wording of this was
prepared in accordance with state law. It provides anyone
wanting to be informed of Special City Council Meetings
to have that right by informing the City of their desire to
be notified. The City would then contact these people in the
event of a Special City Council Meeting.
City Attorney Pauly noted a correction on Page 2795, Subd. 2,
Sentence 3. Sentence should read Sec. 2.07, Subd. 4.
A. Clerk's License List
B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 53-87, Requiring Filing of
Financial Statements by Candidates and Committees
C. Final Plat Approval for Cardinal Ridge 2nd Addition.
Located east of Baker Road and west of 1-494 (Resolution
No. 87-293)
D. Final Plat Approval for The Ridge 2nd Addition. Located
north of T.H. 5 and east of proposed Dell Road extension
(Resolution No. 87-294)
E. Final Plat Approval for American Family Addition.
Located south of Blue Circle Drive, West of County Road 18
in the Opus II Business Park (Resolution No. 87-295)
F. Approval of Special Assessment Agreement for Byant Pointe
G. Approval of Special Assessment Agreement for Prairie
Bluff
H. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 55-87, amending Chapter 2 of
the City Code relating to the posting of a schedule of
the regular meetings of the Council and special and
emergency meetings.
I. American Family Insurance by Opus Corporation. 2nd
Reading of Ordinance No. 51-87-PUD-13-87, Rezoning from
City Council Minutes 3 November 3, 1987
Rural to office; Approval of Developer's Agreement for
American Family Insurance Phase III; and adoption of
Resolution No. 87-297, Authorizing summary of Ordinance
No. 51-87-PUD-13-87, and Ordering publication of Said
Summary. Location: North of CSAH 62, south of Yellow
Circle Drive. (Ordinance & PUD District Review
51-87-PUD-13-87; Resolution No. 87-297 Authorizing
Summary and Publication).
J. Approval of Purchase of Storage Cabinets for Community
Center
K. Resolution No. 87-300 approving the Public Auction of Tax
Forfeited Lands
L. Resolution No. 87-296 approving plans and specifications
for the Red Rock Interceptor submitted by the Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission
M. Partial Payment for Grading Work at Homeward Hills Park,
Willow Park, and Eden Lake Park
O. Final Plat Approval for Prairie View Center 2nd Addition
Resolution 87-302
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris to approve Items
A - 0, excluding Item N on the Consent Calendar. Motion
carried unanimously.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Marriott Courtyard by Marriott Corporation. Request for
Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 109.68
acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 109.68
acres, with variances, Zoning District Change from
C-Regional to C-Regional-Service on 4.2 acres, and
Preliminary Plat of 13.94 acres into three lots for
construction of a 149 room hotel. Location: East of
Highway #169, north of 1-494, west of Prairie Center
Drive, South of Viking Drive. (Resolution No. 87-298 -
PUD Concept Amendment to Overall Southwest Crossing PUB;
Ordinance No. 54-87-PUD-14-87 - PUD District Review and
Rezoning; Resolution No. 87-299 - Preliminary Plat).
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing
was published in the Eden Prairie News on October 21,
1987 and the eight surrounding property owners were
notified.
Dale Beckman, representing the proponent, presented a
summary of the proposed project plans calling for a 149
unit, three story hotel. Also included would be an 89
seat restaurant, small lounge area and several meeting
.2,
City Council Minutes 4 November 3, 1987
rooms. Beckman stated the Marriott Courtyard is designed
for the business traveler and provides a home or club
type atmosphere. Specific areas addressed were: the
parking lot, road access, exterior materials, and
signage.
Director of Planning Chris Enger reported the proponent
had met to review the revised project plans with the
Planning Commission on October 13th and 26th. Enger
stated the Planning Commission had requested additional
plans from Marriott Corporation regarding: storm water
run-off plans, utility and erosion control plans;
notification of grading; detailed lighting plans;
detailed signage plans; samples of exterior building
materials; and a design framework manual. Director of
Planning Enger reported Marriott had supplied the
Planning Commission with all requested materials/
information and that the Planning Commission recommended
City Council approval of the project.
Anderson asked what the roofing material would be.
Beckman said an asphalt shingle would be used to further
create the home type atmosphere. Director of Planning
Enger said this isn't a standard material used on
commercial buildings, however, more and more residential
materials are being used in commercial development. He
stated the life expectancy of the materials was
approximately 20 years, comparable to a metal or pitch
and gravel roof.
Bentley asked if Marriott was considering doing more
than a low level hotel, such as a convention hotel, and
what would encourage a full service, convention hotel.
Mr. Bill Ridgeway, representing Marriott Corporation,
said he worked only with the Courtyard Hotels and not
convention hotels, but in his opinion he felt a strong
immediate support retail shopping center as well as
heavy concentration of office buildings and
accessibility and exposure to several major hotels would
be necessary to warrant a full service, convention
hotel.
Pidcock asked when the feasibility study for this
project had been completed. Ridgeway stated it had
been done two years ago and updated within the last six
months. Pidcock also inquired as to what the room
charges would be. Ridgeway stated Marriott would
probably charge in the high $50's with a possible
reduced weekend rate of $48.
There were no comments from the audience.
City Council Minutes 5 November 3, 1987
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to close the
Public Hearing on this matter. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to adopt
Resolution No. 87-298 for PUD Concept Amendment. Motion
carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve
1st Reading of Ordinance No. 54-87-PUD-14-87 for PUD
District Review and Rezoning. Motion carried
Unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to adopt
Resolution No. 87-299 approving the Preliminary Plat.
Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to direct
staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating
Commission and Staff recommendations and Council
conditions. Motion carried unanimously.
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NO. 38268 - 38525
Pidcock asked who was acting as purchasing agent or how all
the purchases were being coordinated. She requested a memo
from the Staff outlining the purchasing function to ensure
no duplications were being made.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley to approve the
payment of Claims Nos. 38268 - 38525. Roll call vote:
Anderson, Bentley, Harris, Pidcock, and Peterson voted
"aye". Motion carried unanimously.
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
There were none.
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request by Ryan Construction Company on behalf of
Jerry's Super Valu.
City Manager Jullie stated that Jerry's Super Valu has
requested City Council approval to remain open for
business on a 24 hour, seven day a week basis. Jullie
stated this was in conflict with the Development
Agreement signed by Ryan Construction Company in 1979
which prohibited operations between 11:00 PM and 6:00
AM. However, the agreement did provide for Jerry's to
request the Council modify and extend its hours of
City Council Minutes 6 November 3, 1987
operation if other stores similar in nature and located
within a three mile radius from the property came into
existence an were open for business between the hours
of 11:00 PM and 6:00 AM. City Manager Jullie stated that
Ryan Construction Company had met with the area
residents and that a letter addressing their concerns
had been distributed to the Council members at this
meeting. He said it appeared the pathway leading to
Jerry's was a major concern.
The proponent was represented by Bill McHale and Wendy
Madsen of Ryan Construction Company and Steve Summers
and Bob Shadduck of Jerry's Super Valu. Mr. McHale
stated that the pathway was not on Jerry's property and
therefore maintenance/policing of it was out of their
control. Consequently, accountability was now the
crucial issue. He further stated that until recently
they did not know Jerry's owned property on both sides
of the fence. Ms. Madsen reviewed the letter submitted
by Ryan Construction Company item by item and their
proposal to alleviate the concerns of the surrounding
residents. She elaborated on Item 1. D. stating that
either an employee of Supplee's or Jerry's would
monitor both sides of the fence in question, picking up
any trash. Pidcock asked what time the monitoring
would be done. Ms. Madsen said an employee wnuld
monitor between the hours of 9:00 - 12:00 AM aid
between the hours of 3:00 - 6:00 PM.
Bentley inquired as to who was responsible for the
pathway; the City, the Preserve Homeowners Association,
or the Park District. Harris asked where the trash was
most concentrated. Madsen stated the trash was
heaviest around the path but that it was also located
in the residents' backyards. Harris then inquired if
the path was closed would Jerry's still police the area
and pick up trash. Madsen stated they would.
Pidcock asked why Jerry's did not know their property
ran on both sides of the fence. Mr. McHale said there
were two leases, one with Supplee's and one with Super
Valu and that it had just gotten lost between the two;
there was no good reason for it, but it would be taken
care of now.
Anderson asked whose problem the pathway actually was
and inquired as to whether it wasn't actually a
separate issue from the one of 24 hour operation of
Jerry's. Director of Community Services Lambert said
the trail had been required by the City, however, it is
a Preserve trail. Anderson asked if the grade and rise
of the trail meet City requirements. Lambert stated the
City Council Minutes 7 November 3, 1987
design of and the actual trail itself do not meet City
standards. Anderson asked if the trail could be
improved. Lambert stated that these problems are
typical when a trail is located between two homes, but
that some redesign using fencing/shrubbery could be
done.
Pidcock asked about the City's liability in regard to
the pathway. City Attorney Pauly explained that there
could be some liability on Eden Prairie's part due to
the design and maintenance of the pathway. Bentley
asked what the residents' liability would be if an
injury occurred off the path, but due to the path. City
Attorney Pauly said there would be a low degree of
resident liability due to the rights of trespassers in
this type of situation.
Mayor Peterson asked who constructed and maintained the
path. Lambert stated the Preserve Association built it
upon City requirement and maintained it.
Mayor Peterson asked the residents present whether or
not they had received a copy of the letter submitted
from Ryan Construction of October 30th addressing their
concerns. They stated they had.
Bentley said he felt the pathway issue existed
regardless of the hours of operation of Jerry's Super
Valu and that the pathway problems were not connected to
the request by Jerry's to remain open for business on a
24 hour basis. He recommended referring the path
problem to the Park and Recreation Commission for its
recommendation.
Mayor Peterson stated that there were two issues to be
discussed. The pathway and Jerry's request for 24 hour
operation. Comments from the audience would first be
heard regarding the pathway.
Bob Humphreys, 9365 Garrison Way, said his house was
right next to the path. He distributed pictures and
stated that the landscaping did not deter the sight of
the fence. He also said that kids played with the trash
can located at the end of the pathway and that sections
of the fence were missing. He said it was a challenge
to walk on in the winter and had become a significant
nuisance due to the noise and traffic, stating up to 150
people use the path daily. Liability is a major concern
due to kids using the path to skateboard and ride
mopeds. He suggested the path be redirected to the
other side of the shopping center.
City Council Minutes 8 November 3, 1987
Bentley commented that he earlier stated he felt the
pathway was a separate issue than the one before the
Council of 24 hour operation for Jerry's Super Valu and
that he had hoped to preclude a long discussion on the
pathway issue. He also stated he would not take action
on this issue until the Park and Recreation Commission
and Staff had a chance to meet with the Preserve
Homeowners Association about it.
Mayor Peterson said that the residents seemed to be
concerned about both issues and that due to the light
agenda the people present should be given the
opportunity to air their views.
Anderson stated he agreed with Bentley and that while
the residents should certainly be heard, no action
could be taken on the pathway problem at this meeting.
Larry Paumen, 9712 Clark Circle said he felt if
Jerry's were open on a 24 hour basis, the path would be
too. The residents would have to put up with the
problems on a 24 hour basis. He said he is on his
second hedge, the kids were destroying it and the
fence. He feels the kids hanging out in the area are
an invasion of his privacy. He stated that the fence
is only eight feet high and that he had a clear sight
of Jerry's trash compactor, loading dock and parking
lot. He felt most of the problems had developed in the
last two years.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to defer
this item to the Staff and the Park and Recreation
Commission to complete a thorough and comprehensive
review of the necessity for the path in question and
what can be done to mitigate the problems in relation
to the path. Motion passed unanimously.
Anderson stated he felt the path started out as being
good but that the neighborhood kids had grown up and
that the trail was not the problem but the people using
It were. He did state that if Mopeds were being driven
on the path that was a violation of City Ordinance.
Mayor Peterson stated the Council would now hear
comments regarding the 24 hour operation of Jerry's
Super Valu.
Keith Walters, 9682 Clark Circle, presented the Council
with pictures of the back of Jerry's Super Valu and the
back of Driskill's Super Valu noting the lack of land-
City Council Minutes 9 November 3, 1987
scaping behind Jerry's. He also stated the residents
didn't want to hear what Jerry's will do to correct the
problems one day before the Council meeting when they
should have been doing it all along. He stated the
more than adequate landscaping behind Driskill's
separated that store from a church and one residence.
He also presented the Council with a notice Jerry's had
distributed to its customers in September which stated
the store was changing to a New Market operation and
would remain open on a 24 hour basis. He also talked
about night deliveries and said Ryan Construction had
not addressed the lighting problem.
Bentley asked Mr. Walters if he had received the
October 30th letter from Ryan Construction which stated
their committment to no trash pick up or deliveries
being made between 11:00 PM and 6:00 AM. Mr. Walters
stated he had, however, Jerry's should have been
operating that way all along. Mr. McHale reported a
lighting contractor had been retained to check out the
lighting. Mayor Peterson stated the hedge behind
Driskill's was on church property and was there prior
to Driskill's.
Paula King, 9672 Clark Circle, said she felt the most
important item, the security, safety and protection, of
the residents was what needed to be discussed and she
was disturbed it had not been. She reported there were
three open areas in the fence and that it was also easy
to jump over thereby providing easy access to the
neighborhood. She felt the residents would end up
monitoring and enforcing the area as she did not feel
Jerry's personnel would. She also said the police had
been called often in the past regarding the problems in
this area and mentioned the recent rape in the Preserve
as warranting her concerns about safety. Bentley stated
safety of residents was a concern of his and asked the
Proponent why they had not addressed the security/
security guard issue. Pidcock asked City Manager
Jullie to check into how many police calls were
reported from the Jerry's location. City Manager
Jullie said he would do this but that not all calls are
documented so it would be somewhat difficult.
Harris inquired as to the economic feasibility of a 24
hour operation. Mr. McHale said that sales were down
due to Rainbow being open 24 hours and that Super Valu
felt being open 24 hours was economically feasible. He
also stated that security guards were paid about $6.00
per hour and he felt you got what you paid for. He
also said the store manager and stock boys were
City Council Minutes 10 November 3, 1987
responsible for monitoring the area because there was
not a continuous need for a security guard. Bentley
stated he felt the employees would not police the area
properly due to peer pressure, etc.
Pidcock commented that Driskill's had been open 24
hours but they found it not economically feasible and
now closed at night. Steve Summers of Super Valu
addressed this stating that Driskill's closed to save
costs but Jerry's Super Valu was taking a more
aggressive stand to meet the competition. He also
noted a SuperAmerica, containing a bakery and deli, had
recently opened on a 24 hour basis in the area. Mr.
Summer said a lot of issues had been raised recently
that he was not previously aware of and that measures
had been taken to correct the late night and early
morning pickups and deliveries. He explained that the
handout given to customers in September had been copied
from another store and that it had not been proofed
properly, hence the statement regarding 24 hour
operation had been included on it.
Harris again asked why 24 hour operation was essential
and whether or not it was economically feasible.
Summers stated bakery and cleaning personnel were
already at the store during the night so they had many
of the overhead costs whether the store was open or
not. Harris noted she had not seen sufficient demand
for a 24 hour operation at other area stores.
Bentley noted a historical fact of why the original
request for 24 hour operation had been denied in 1979
stating that at that time the trend was for 24 hour
operations to cease doing business on a 24 hour basis,
but that the trend may be reversing itself now.
Pidcock questioned whether other stores open 24 hours
had any extra police calls/problems. Mr. Shadduck
stated he had no experience with any of the New Markets
using security guards as the store managers were
responsible for dealing with all on-site problems. He
also said they had a good working relationship with
local police in all the areas of their 24 hour
operations.
John King, 9672 Clark Circle, stated that all the
problems were related to an inadequate barrier and that
no other 24 hour business was located as close to a
residential area as this one. He felt it was hard to
believe it was economically feasible and that
residents' property values should not go down just so a
business can operate on a 24 hour basis.
)-f
City Council Minutes 11 November 3, 1987
Mr. McHale stated a study had been done on the
condition of the fence. Anchor posts would be
resecured and the boards would be checked and
refastened yearly. He also felt the purpose of the
fence was to provide a screen, not totally obliterate
sight of the building.
Joyce Pauman, 9712 Clark Circle, questioned the type of
people that shop in the middle of the night and said
she was concerned about security because of this.
Charles Sabathne, 9652 Clark Circle, said he felt Ryan
Construction Company and Jerry's Super Valu were acting
in good faith, however, historically they had shown
they were less than reliable in doing so. He said it
would be hard to take back the 24 hour operation
approval once it was given should further problems/
developments occur.
Bentley asked if the approval was unfettered would the
Council have the ability to bring the issue back before
them at any time for reconsideration. City Attorney
Pauly stated the Council would not have this right
without the agreement of the owner. Bentley stated an
agreement should be contingent upon an agreement
between the Staff and Ryan Construction. City Attorney
Pauly stated an amendment to this would have to be
added to the agreement.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to continue
this item until further information requested regarding
police calls is available.
Mayor Peterson called for an amendment to the motion
clarifying the contingency of approval. Discussion
followed regarding the fairness of this continuance to
the Proponent.
VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT: Amendment carried unanimously.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously.
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
There were no reports.
IX. APPOINTMENTS
Mayor Peterson recommended the appointment of Thomas W.
Howden to fill the vacancy on the Historical and Cultural
Commission. His term would expire February 28, 1989.
City Council Minutes 12 November 3, 1987
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson to appoint
Thomas W. Howden to the Historical and Cultural Commission
to fill an unexpired term to February 28, 1989. Motion
carried unanimously.
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. City Manager's Review Forms
Mayor Peterson requested the completed forms from
the Council Members regarding the City Manager's
review. Harris and Pidcock stated they had had
difficulty completing various sections of the form.
Discussion was held on whether or not there was a
self evaluation mechanism in place. Mayor Peterson
acknowledged the various difficulties Council
members may have had in completing the form, but
stated he felt their perceptions were important to
note. He agreed to explore modified use of the
form in the future and told the Council Members to
feel free not to answer any questions they had
problems with. Mayor Peterson then requested all
Council Members turn their forms into him as soon
as possible.
2. Appointment of Council Member to Manager's Review
Committee
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to
nominate Anderson to the Manager's Review
Committee. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Intersection of Anderson Lakes Parkway and Highway
#169
Pidcock stated she had received numerous calls
regarding the east and west right hand lanes on
Anderson Lakes Parkway at the intersection of
Highway #169. Traffic traveling straight across
the intersection and traffic turning right onto
Highway #169 all use the same lane causing quite a
bit of congestion. Director of Public Works Dietz
stated this intersection would be included in the
Highway #169 improvement project for which bids
will open in the fall of 1988. He said signage had
been ordered to try and help alleviate the problem
but the Department will take another look at it.
‘;'•
City Council Minutes 13 November 3, 1987
B. Report of City Manager
1. Award of Contract for Fire Station Construction
City Manager Jullie recommended that the City
Council authorize the Mayor and City Manager to
executive a contract with Watson-Forsberg Company
in the amount of $1,353,450 for construction and
remodeling of fire stations in accordance with the
plans and specifications and bids submitted for the
work. He also recommended that the City Council
authorize issuance of up to $300,000 in fire
equipment certificates.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris to
authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute a
contract with Watson-Forsberg Company in the amount
of $1,353,450 for construction and remodeling of
fire stations in accordance with the plans and
specifications and bids submitted for the work.
Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris to
authorize issuaw:e of up to $300,000 in fire
equipment certificates. Motion carried with
Pidcock abstaining.
2. City Manager Jullie stated the City Hall Review
Commission would be having a social gathering on
November 24th at Edenvale Clubhouse beginning at
5:30 PM.
C. Report of City Attorney
City Attorney Pauly requested the Council meet in a
closed session following this meeting to discuss
landfill litigation and possible contests.
D. Report of Director of Planning
There was no report.
E. Report of the Director of Community Services
1. Edenvale Trail (EAW) continued from 10/21/87
Director of Community Services Lambert stated
several new reports had been presented to the
Council regarding the environmental impact of this
project.
City Attorney Pauly concluded that an EAW covering
City Council Minutes 14 November 3, 1987
the entire Purgatory Creek floodplain and adjacent
area is not required in connection with the
proposed action. He stated that tonight's action
would be to improve and because studies show no
negative impact on the environment, no further
reviews would be required.
Attorney Charles Dayton, representing the area
residents, spoke to this issue stating the main
areas of concern were:
1) An EIS is necessary and appropriate because
the residents feel the proposed trail
segment will eventually become part of the
entire Purgatory Creek Trail system.
Consequently, a study of the entire system,
not just this project, is warranted.
2) Better alternatives suggested by the
residents have not been addressed by the
Council. These alternatives would be to
move the bridge further south and place the
mowed trail on the southwest side of the
creek.
3) The residents feel the environmental issues
have not been properly addressed or
assessed.
Attorney Dayton requested a fuller environmental
study of the project be completed and that further
alternatives be assessed.
Director of Planning Lambert addressed the issues
raised by Mr. Dayton and stated the City has
concluded this trail won't be connected to other
portions of the Purgatory Creek trail program but
rather that it will be an isolated section of
trail. He said the nature of the study has always
indicated a mowed grass trail on top of the
interceptor line. The main reason for the trail is
for transportation for residents for access to the
neighborhood park. The trail will be flagged and
marked during spring and summer so that
ecologically sensitive areas are not disturbed.
City Attorney Pauly said the findings do reflect
the record despite Mr. Dayton's view that they
don't. Mr. Dayton stated that it was obvious that
portions of the trail could be connected by
roadways so there was no question the long range
intent was to make it part of the entire Purgatory
Creek trail system.
City Council Minutes 15 November 3, 1987
Director of Planning Lambert stated the Parks
Commission recommends the City Council approve the
EAW for a mowed trail as proposed.
Mr. Dayton stated that a major concern of the
residents was that the trail would be made
bituminous in the future.
James Cullen, 15381 Creekside Court, representing
the resident group said the most significant issue
was the addition of an eight foot wide bituminous
trail in an ecologically sensitive area. He
further stated he was not opposed to a mowed trail
but if all were in agreement that it was an
ecologically sensitive area why get hung up on
injecting an eight foot bituminous trail. He
feels this would invite active people use. He also
questioned whether all reasonable alternatives have
been studied.
George Carlson, 16171 South Hillcrest Court, stated
he was for the trail and he sees the advantages of
having a walking path to observe nature, cross
country ski, etc. He said half of the residents in
the area were for the project and the principal
opposition was from the Edenvale side. He said
most of the homes the trail would pass were on the
hill. He also said he was for a mowed trail but
that a bituminous trail was not called for and that
the trail should be blocked to vehicle traffic.
Darlene Thoen, 15361 Creekside Court, stated the
fire in the area last summer had been reported by
her and regardless of reports, the fire had been
caused by people. She said that if a trail were
going to be put in, people management would be
needed.
Kathy Gruidl, 15520 Edgewood Court, stated not all
homes were on the hill and that the proposed bridge
would be in one of the resident's backyard.
Bentley asked Director of Planning Lambert what
specific action he was requesting this evening.
Lambert stated that they were asking the Council to
approve the negative findings of the EAW and
authorize a mowed trail along the perimeter section
with a bridge to the Hillcrest Court trail and to
continue studying the feasibility of a woodchip
trail around the marsh.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson to
,
City Council Minutes 16 November 3, 1987
approve the negative findings of the EAW and
authorize a mowed trail on top of the interceptor
line along the perimeter section with a bridge
connecting to the Hillcrest Court trail and to
continue studying the feasibility of a woodchip
trail around the marsh.
Mayor Peterson requested the minutes of the August
5, 1987 City Council Meeting be incorporated as
part of the record of these proceedings.
Lambert stated the mowed section would not become
bituminous without resident petition. If the
residents should petition for this, a determination
by the City Council would be necessary at that
time.
Bentley stated that the case has clearly been made
that the trail will cause no significant
environmental impact and that a transportation
trail is needed to serve the community as a whole,
therefore this trail is important.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion passed unanimously.
F. Report of the Director of Public Works
There was no report.
XI. NEW BUSINESS
There was no New Business.
XII. ADJOURNMENT
The Council adjourned at 11:00 PM to a closed session with
City Attorney Pauly to discuss items in litigation.
NATALIE J. SWAGGERT
DIRECTOR HUMAN SERVICES/RESOURCES
FROM:
CONSENT CALENDAR
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 1987
SUBJECT: FUNDING REQUEST
The Human Rights and Services Commission recently met with a representative of
the Senior Community Services-Outreach program to review their request for funding in
1988.
The Commission was impressed with the organizations presentation and with the
level of service already being delivered to seniors in Eden Prairie. Senior Outreach
provides help to seniors in the form of needs assessment, helping seniors locate and
tie into services such as Homemaker, Meals-Ala-Car, and other in-home services as
well as providing grief and adjustment counseling, support groups and education for caregivers of older adults. The services address an important and growing area of
'need in our community and are not duplicated by other organizations currently being
funded.
The Commission is recommending that the Senior Community Services request for
$335.00 be approved and that the funds be made available through the 1988 Human
Services $5000 evolving needs fund allocation.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-319
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PERMIT APPLICATION
FOR FOUNTAIN PLACE APARTMENTS
WHEREAS, the proposed sanitary sewer to be constructed for Fountain Place
Apartments requires a connection to the Metropolitan Waste Control
Commission (MWCC) interceptor system; and
WHEREAS, the proposed connection conforms to the Eden Prairie Comprehensive
Sewer Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to submit an
application for "Permit for Connection to or Use of Commission
Facilities" to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on December 1, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-320
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LICENSE TO
CROSS PUBLIC WATERS WITH A SANITARY SEWER FOR
FOUNTAIN PLACE APARTMENTS
WHEREAS, the proposed sanitary sewer to be constructed for Fountain Place
Apartments requires crossing of an area designated by the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources as protected waters; and
WHEREAS, a license from the Department of Natural Resources is necessary to
authorize this crossing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
A. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to
submit an application for license to cross public waters and execute
said license when processed.
ADOPTED by the City Council on December 1, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
I.C. 52-033A
HOMEWARD HILLS ROAD
TO: Rice Lake Contracting
The City proposes to make the following changes for work performed by this
contract:
NATURE OF CHANGES
1. An existing hydrant and gate valve needed to be raised to match the
proposed boulevard grade.
2. An existing sanitary sewer service had to be insulated due to insufficient
cover.
3. A retaining wall was built in order to save a 36" Oak.
4. Based on a recommendation from the soils firm, approximately 400 feet of
Street needed two feet of material removed and replaced with granular
material. Change Order No. 1 included the excavation and granular borrow
quantities for this work. Items included in this change order are
scarifing subgrade, installing perforated drain pipe and geotextile fabric
(unit price covered under existing bid items).
ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT COSTS
1. Add the following quantities and costs to the contract:
Foreman w/pickup 2 hours @ $38.50/hr. = $
77.00
Laborers
2 hours @ $24.50/hr. $
49.00
Materials
•
$
230.43
Overhead and Profit (15%)
•
$
53.46
TOTAL
$ 409.89
2. Add the following quantities and costs to the contract:
Foreman w/pickup
2 hours @ $38.50/hr. = $
77.00
Materials = $
142.46
Overhead and Profit (15%)
= $
32.92
TOTAL $ 252.38
3f->c)
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
Page 2 of 2
3. Add the following quantities and costs to the contract:
Timber Retaining Wall 297 S.F. @ $7.50/SF = $ 2,227.50
Overhead and Profit (15%) = $ 334.12
TOTAL
$ 2,561.62
4. Add the following quantities and costs to the contract:
0-7 Dozer w/Operator
Bomag Compactor w/Operator
690 Backhoe w/Operator
D-3 Dozer w/Operator
Foreman w/Pickup
Laborers
Material
Overhead and Profit (15%)
Geotextile Fabric
6 hours @ $85.00 $
2 hours @ $45.00 = $
7 hours @ $85.00 = $
2 hours @ $45.00 = $
7 hours @ $38.50 = $
13 hours @ $24.50 $
• $
• $
16,000 SF @ $ 0.25/SF = $
510.00
90.00
595.00
90.00
269.50
318.50
954.90
424.18
4,000.00
TOTAL
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT ADJUSTMENTS
Contract Amount Prior to this Change Order
Net Increase Resulting from this Change Order
Current Contract Amount Including this Change Order
$ 7,252.08
$386,807.95
$ 10,475.97
$397,283.92
THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE APPROVED
City of Eden Prairie
City of Eden Prairie
By
By
Date Date
THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTED
Rice Lake Contracting
By
Date
3(41
RECOMMENDED:
by
nitt1CDC No. 1910-8-B ((983 Ed
;
APPROVED:
rid:fit..., by
ion)
Owner
CHANGE ORDER
(Instructions on reverse side) No
1
PROJECT:
OWNER:
(Name,
Address)
Hidden Glen 3rd Addition
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Dr ive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
DATE OF ISSUANCE: November 25, 1987
CONTRACTOR: Nodland Construction Co., Inc •OWNER's Project No. IC 52-102 & if 52-129
P.O. Box 338
Alexandria, MN 56308 ENGINEER: Rieke Carroll Muller Assoc., Inc.
10901 Red Circle Dr ive
CONTRACT FOR:
Minnetonka, MN 55343
Waterma in and Street improvementsENGINEER's Project No
Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer,
871013
You are directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents.
Description: Additional 1700 feet of street and waterma in, 1120
f
e
e
t
o
f
s
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
s
e
w
e
r
and 500 feet of storm sewer on Tristram Way. See attached pr
o
p
o
s
a
l
f
o
r
m
for Wyndham Crest I .0 . 52-129
Purpose of Change Order:
100% petition by property owner
Attachments: (List documents supporting change) Construction plans an
d
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
b
y
R
i
e
k
e
C
a
r
r
o
l
l
Muller Assoc., inc. and proposal form for Wyndham Crest - I .C.
5
2
-
1
2
9
.
CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE:
Original Contract Price
$ 793,512.00
CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME:
Original Contract Time
I .C. 52-102
Substantial Completion - Aug. 31, 1987
Final Completion "1 0141.y 15, 1988
Previous Change Orders No --- to No Net change from previous Change Orders
$
day.
Contract Price prior to this Change Order
$ 793,512.00
Contract Time Prior to this Change Order
I.C. 52-129
Substantial Completion - Aug. 31, 1987
Final Completion 6"°'°°' July 15, 1988
Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order
$ 166,956.00
Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order
See Below
n.y.
Contract Price with all approved Change Orders
960,468.00 $
Contract Time with all approved Change Orders
I .C. 52-102 (previous project) Subs. Con Aug. 31, 1987, Final Compl . July 15, 19)
I .c . 52-129 (this"ellattite order ) Subs. Cc
uly ,Final Comp l. - June 15, 1989
Prepared by the Enmneers Jots Contract Documents Commttee and endorsed by The
A
s
s
o
m
a
i
e
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
s
A
m
e
n
c
a
.
•ss
pl -
8
' RCM 87 101 3
FROPOSAL FORM
atme corm= CO.,
P. C. Kt 328 ALEXAM, AU :ma (612) 7615159
SVYNDHAM CREST
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 52-129
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
Honorable Mayor and City Council
c/o John Franc, City Clerk
Eden Prairie City Hall
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Councilmembers:
The undersigned declares he has fully examined the Plans and Specifications as
prepared by the City Engineer (or consultant) and all other Contract Documents
under Improvement Contract 52-129 on file in the office of the City Engineer, all
of which are fully understood and hereby agreed to, and has inspected in detail
the site of the proposed work, and has familiarized himself with the local
conditions affecting the work and contract and the detailed requirements of
construction and testing and completion, and waives all right to plead
misunderstanding of any item in relation to Improvement Contract No. 52-129.
The undersigned agrees that if this Proposal is accepted, he is to furnish and
provide all necessary labor, materials, machinery, tools, apparatus and all other
means of construction, and performing the work, and to complete in strict
accordance with the above mentioned Plans and Specifications and Contract
Documents of Improvement Contract No. 52-129 involving the following listed
approximate quantities:
PF-1
3o.:3
440 $ !LI;
320 $
50 $
100 $ -
60 siE
50 $ 1q -
90 $
20 _ $
8 S att.'
33.5 $ 13-u
$ (1110
$ 148c::
$ S'co
$ Pick!
$ lc Se
$
$
$ 84.2c
$
$
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
EA
LF
LS S / 5cc S /51,
LS
1
LF
9.0
EA
24
LF
790
300 S
150 $ il - S&Ce _
1 $ Ic $
$44.7cs
TON
TON
EA
'• RCM 871013
WYNDHAM CREST
PROPOSAL FORM
I.C. 52-129
Item Item Description Unit Ouantitv Unit Price Amount
SANITARY SEWER
1 8" Sewcr Pipe 0-10' Deep
2 8" Sewer Pipe 10'-12' Deep
3 8" Sewer Pipe 12'-14' Deep
4 8" Sewer Pipe 14'-16' Deep
5 8" Sewer Pipe 16%18' Deep
6 8" Sewer Pipe 18'-20' Deep
7 8" Sewer Pipe 20-22' Deep
8 8" Sewer Pipe 22-24' Deep
9 Standard Manhole 0-8' Deep
10 Extra Depth Standard Manhole
11 Connect to Existing Manhole and5
Drop Section
12 Construct Manhole 9 Over Existing
18" Sanitary Sewer Complete
13 Construct 8" Outside Drop Section
14 8"x4" Service Wyes
15 4" Service Pipe
16 Eden Prairie Sand and Gravel
Bedding
17 Eden Prairie Binderstone Bedding
18 Adjust Existing Manhole and Top
Subtotal Sanitary Sewer
WATERMAIN
1 6" DIP Watermain (incl. Hyd. Lead) LF 1,730 $ 13 - $ •2.2. 'Kt,'
2 6" Gate Valve and Box EA 3 $ .?3o S IcSo
3 Hydrant with Gate Valve and Box EA 6 $ I ic e . $ .1 8co
4 Watermain Fittings LB 1,900 $ C " $ /
5 6" Wet Tap (Including Tapping
Sleeve and Valve) EA 1 $ ..tue.. $ ".c:c c
6 3/4" x 1" Corporation Cock EA 24 $ ,4)--0 $ / a. c c
7 1" Curb Stop and Box EA 24 $J cc) S
PF-2
RCM 871013
Hem Item Descriotion rjjj.t Ouantitv Unit Price Amount
8 1" Copper Service LF 700 $ 4' $
9 Adjust Existing Hydrant EA 1 $ /50 $ /S-0 10 Adjust Existing Valve Box EA 2 $ /CO S ;WO 11 8 Mill "Tube Type Film Wrap LF 1,730 $ i "" $ /1 3:- . 12 Eden Prairie Sand and Gravel
Bedding TON 400 $ a. $ EOZ
13 Eden Prairie Binderstone Bedding TON 200 $ 14- - $
14 Insulation Board (4" Thick) SF 400 $ 1 " s_2:_u
Subtotal Watermain
$45.5-s-b
DRAINAGE. LANDSCAPING AND_STREET CONSTRUCTION se
I Remove Bituminous Pavement SY 200 $ i
2 Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter LF 75 $ :1 - $ ;0.4 - 3 Bituminous Base Course (MnDOT 2331)TON 575 51/ ).c $ 1.-Vsl3
4 Bituminous Material for Base
Course Mix TON 29 $ 1.-,I $ ?71e,
5 Bituminous Wear Course (MnDOT 234ITON 431 5 II l'i-
6 Bituminous Material for Wear
Course Mix TON 28 $ 1.*? ,3 $ 7 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat GAL 250 $ / S-c $ .1-7 S- - 8 Aggregate Base Class 5 (100%
Crushed Quarry Rock) TON 2,100 S 1 - $ N7c..1
9 B618 Concrete Cu-b and Gutter LF 200 $ 1./--c $ ck,e
10 Eden Prairie Concrete Mountable
Curb LF 3,300 $ 4 50
I I Eden Prairie Concrete Valley
Gutter LF 106 $ /o $ /Ct; 0
12 Bituminous Driveway Restoration SY 37 $ .kv. $
13 Topsoil, Seed and Mulch ACRE 0.75 5 5-"iii_$ •i'1.5- •
14 Topsoil and Sod SY 745 $ /13- $ /3e./7 S
15 12" RCP CL V Storm Sewer LF 118 S 1 - $ Z•/-1
16 15" RCP CL V Storm Sewer LF 309 $ 3- X $ /c -141
17 21" RCP CL IV Storm Sewer LF 72 $ 4,16- $ /S./1..-
18 Eden Prairie Standard Manhole
Design S-I EA 2 $ Cioc, $
PF-3
RCM 871013
Imm Item Description. Unit Ouantitv Unit Price Amount
19 Eden Prairie Catchbasin Design S-5 EA 7 $ (Th0 S L .4.‘•
20 Eden Prairie Catchbasin Design S-7 EA 2 $ /1Co $
21 21* RCFES with Riprap and Filter
Blanket EA 2 $ 11.4: $ / 4oe
22 Eden Prairie Sand and Gravel
Bedding TON 75 $ '-)`
25 Eden Prairie Binderstone Bedding TON 40 S Li $ /bc
Subtotal Drainage, Landscaping and Street Construction
SUMMARY:.
SANITARY SEWER
WATERMAIN
DRAINAGE, LANDSCAPING AND STREET CONSTRUCTION
I
$ 14505-
$ 4.555-0
Sikfic)
TOTAL BASE BID $
The undersigned agrees that, if the city decides to diminish or extend the work, or
otherwise alter it by extras or deductions, he will perform the work as altered, increased
or decreased, subject to the unit bid prices.
The undersigned agrees to enter into contract in form hereto attached and to furnish a
corporate surety bond as required by the General Conditions both within ten (10) days
from date of postmark on mailing containing Notice of Award from the City, should this
proposal be accepted. In the event of the failure of the undersigned to enter into such a contract within said ten (10) days, then the amount of bid security attached hereto is to be
forfeited as agreed liquidated damages to the City of Eden Prairie.
In submitting this bid, it is understood that the right is reserved by the City to reject any
or all bids, and it is agreed that this bid may not be withdrawn for a period of thirty (30)
days from the opening thereof.
I hereby acknowledge receipt of the following addenda:
Official Address:
PF-4
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-314
RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING
PREPARATION OF 1987 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLS AND SETTING
HEARING DATE
WHEREAS, contracts have been let for the following listed improvements and
the total project cost, including expenses incurred, or to be incurred and
the City's share, exclusive of that assignable to City Property, are estab-
lished as shown on the attached Exhibit A.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
1. The cost of such improvements to be specially assessed are hereby
declared to be those as set forth in Exhibit A.
2. The City Clerk with the assistance of the City Engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be assessed for each
improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of
such proposed assessment in the office of the Deputy Clerk for
public inspection.
3. A hearing shall be held on the 15th day of December, 1987, in
the Eden Prairie City Hall, 7600 Executive Drive, at 7:30 p.m.
to pass upon such proposed assessments and at such time and
place all persons owning property affected by such improvement
will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to
such assessments.
4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the
hearing on the proposed assessments to be published once in
the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hear-
ing. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the
owner of record of each parcel described in the assessment
roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on December 1, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
EXHIBIT A
1987 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
PROJECT
1. I.C. 52-048B
Balance of Assessments Due
Against Lot 3, Block 2
LaVonne Industrial Park
TOTAL COST
$16,822.49
?Cf.:7
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-315
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
FOUNTAIN PLACE APARTMENTS
WHEREAS, the plat of FOUNTAIN PLACE APARTMENTS has been submitted in a manner
required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under
Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had
thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for FOUNTAIN PLACE APARTMENTS is approved
upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
report on this plat dated NOVEMBER 24, 1987.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of
this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named
plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute
the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon
compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on DECEMBER 1, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
3
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician
DATE: November 24, 1987
SUBJECT: FOUNTAIN PLACE APARTMENTS
PROPOSAL: The Developer, CSM Corporation, has requested City Council approval
of the Final Plat of Fountain Place Apartments. Located north of Columbine
Road and west of Trunk Highway 169, the plat contains 52 acres to be
divided into 5 lots, 2 outlots and right-of-way dedication for street
purposes. The plat will contain six residential apartment buildings for
a total of 490 units. Outlots A & B contain 18.35 acres and 2.94 acres
respectively. Ownership of outlot A will be transferred to the City by
a warranty deed. Outlot B will be retained by the Developer with eventual
transfer to the City upon development of the remainder of the property
lying east of Columbine Road.
HISTORY: Zoning change from the rural district to the PUD-9-87-RM-2.5 district
was finally read and approved by the City Council October 20, 1987, per
Ordinance 040-87-PUD-9-87.
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council August 18, 1987, per
Resolution 87-231.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed
October 20, 1987.
VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of
Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities, streets and walkways will be
installed in conformance with City standards.
Portions of the property within the plat were previously assessed for
trunk sewer and water. These assessments have been "green acre" deferred
since 1982. With development of the property the deferments will be
terminated and the assessments become active. Additionally, there are
17.01 acres not previously assessed for trunk sewer and water that would
be assessed at the current rate of $2,850.00 per acre.
PAGE 2 OF 2
FOUNTAIN PLACE APARTMENTS NOVEMBER 24, 1987
Presently, there is a feasibility study underway for the extensio
n
o
f
Columbine Road north to Prairie Center Drive and a connection to T
N
1
6
9
.
Prior to release of the final plat, Developer shall enter into a s
p
e
c
i
a
l
assessment agreement covering the Developer's share of the constru
c
t
i
o
n
costs of Columbine Road and Fountain Place, the connecting road to TH 169.
The northern one-third of Columbine Road is shown as outlot C.
P
r
i
o
r
t
o
release of the final plat, the plat shall be revised to includ
e
o
u
t
l
o
t
C
as dedicated right-of-way for Columbine Road.
Plat shall be revised to include a 20' wide drainage and utilit
y
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
over the storm sewer from Magnolia Trail to the outfall between
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
3 and 4. This portion of storm sewer, as well as that within M
a
g
n
o
l
i
a
Trail, will be publicly owned and maintained.
The 20' wide walkway corridor shown on the plat must be revised
t
o
a
2
0
'
drainage and utility easement and the City be provided with rec
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
easement documents for its intended use as a walkway.
PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication shall conform to City code a
n
d
t
h
e
Developer's Agreement requirements.
BONDING: Bonding shall conform to the requirements of City co
d
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
Developer's Agreement. These requirements shall apply to the pu
b
l
i
c
l
y
owned utilties and street improvements, except for Columbine Ro
a
d
c
o
n
-
structed under a City improvement contract.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Founta
i
n
P
l
a
c
e
Apartments subject to the requirements of this report, the Devel
o
p
e
r
'
s
Agreement, and the following:
1. Receipt of street sign fee of $1,115.00
2. Receipt of street lighting fee of $4,506.00
3. Receipt of engineering fee of $19,600.00
4. Receipt of warranty deed for outlot A
5. Revision of the plat to include the following:
a) Addition of 20' wide drainage and utility easement for storm
sewer from Magnolia Trail to outfall between buildings 3 and 4
b) Outlot C changed to dedicated right-of-way for Columbine Road
c) 20' walkway to be shown as drainage and utility easement and
submission of easement documents describing the walkway use
6. Satisfaction of bonding requirements.
JJ:ss
CC: Lloyd Cherne
Valley Engineering
Bauer & Associates
Hanson, Thorp, Pellinen & Olson
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-317
RESOLUTION ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT
WHEREAS, it is proposed to make the following improvements:
I.C. 52-131 (Hamilton Road Drainage Improvements)
and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of
the improvements, pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Chapter 429.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council:
That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer
for study with the assistance of Hanson, Thorp, Pellinen and
Olson, and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and
presented to the City Council 'with all convenient speed advising
the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment
and feasibility of the proposed improvements.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on December 1, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
MEMORANDM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, P.E.
Director of Public Works
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
DATE: November 23, 1987
RE: Hamilton Road Feasibility Study
I.C. 52-131
Included on the Council Agenda is a resolution that authorizes the preparation
of a feasibility study for the improvement of Hamilton Road (lying westerly of
Washington Avenue). The plat that created Hamilton Road was approved as the
Claredon Industrial Park and was recorded in about 1962. Presumably, the road-
way was constructed shortly thereafter, but not in accordance with the kinds of
standards that are required in industrial parks today.
The roadway does not have curb and gutter nor an underground storm sewer system
to convey surface water. During the development process of the project, a
drainage and utility easement was proposed that would convey storm water from
the end of the cul-de-sac northeasterly to a proper disposal point. However,
records indicate that easement was never executed or recorded. One of the
property owners in the Industrial Park brought the issue to focus last year when
they constructed an earthen berm that blocked drainage and caused water to stand
on Hamilton Road.
I suspect that going through a proper legal process would result in our ability
to get an easement to allow for surface drainage of the water from Hamilton
Road. However, since the road is quite old and does not conform to present day
standards, I am recommending that we consider a special assessment project to
install curb and gutter and the appropriate storm sewer improvements as a perm-
anent solution at this time.
I sent the attached letter to all of the property owners to discuss this in
advance of bringing this issue to the City Council. However, I got response
from only two property owners -- both saying they thought the improvements would
be beneficial but were concerned about the potential cost and who would pay
those costs. I believe the feasibility report will be the proper tool to answer
these questions.
Since we have not had a petition for the work, the process would go forward only
under the motion of the Council and it would therefore require a four-fifths
majority vote for each resolution to allow the project to progress.
EAD:ss
Enclosure
2 /
)
CITY OFFICES/ 7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE / EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 553444677 / TELEPHONE (612) 937-2262
Sincere
October 26, 1987
Gerald W. Schilling, President
Affiliated Services, Inc.
9905 Hamilton Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
RE: Hamilton Road Drainage Improvements
I.C. 52-131
Dear Mr. Schilling:
Approximately one year ago, private grading occurred adjacent to Hamilton
Road which altered the drainage in the industrial park adjacent to the
roadway. Since that time, the City of Eden Prairie has made an effort to
determine how this situation might be resolved. While there may be some
legal remedies, we are coming to the conclusion that a project to improve
drainage, install concrete curb and gutter and appropriate upgrading of
the street is long overdue. Consequently, a special assessment project
is being considered for the purpose of making those improvements.
This letter is addressed to all property owners with frontage along Hamilton
Road and is being used as an invitation to you to attend a meeting to
discuss this potential project. The details of the meeting are as follows:
Date: November 17, 1987
Time: 2:00 P.M.
Location: Council Chambers
City Hall
7600 Executive Drive
The purpose of this meeting is to provide some background information on the
history of the area, the need for the project and to discuss the procedures
that are followed in developing a special assessment improvement project.
If the project proceeds, the first step would be to develop a feasibility
study which would review potential design alternatives as well as identify
project cost and method of assessing the benefit.
If no one from your organization is able to attend the meeting, I would very
much appreciate some written response expressing your reaction to the idea
of an improvement project as outlined above. I look forward to meeting with
you to discuss this important project.
Eugene A. Dietz, P.E.
Director of Public Works
EAD:ss
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, P.E.
Director of Public Work
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
DATE: November 23, 1987
RE: Terex Loader "buy-back"
File 51-407
In 1981, the City of Eden Prairie purchased a Terex Wheel Loader (
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
competitive bids). The primary consideration in awarding the cont
r
a
c
t
t
o
Borchert-Ingersoll was in the five-year "buy-back" provision.
The specifications for the loader provided that after five years the
v
e
n
d
o
r
would guarantee to repurchase the piece of equipment for a fixed pric
e
-
-
i
n
the case of the low bid by Borchert-Ingersoll in an amount of $92,800.00
.
T
h
i
s
"buy-back" provision was very popular during the time that we acquir
e
d
o
u
r
loader. The provision has worked very well for the companies, how
e
v
e
r
,
t
h
e
economy turned and Borchert-Ingersoll found themselves in a position
o
f
n
o
t
being able to fulfill the contract provisions.
Ric Rosow and I have been negotiating with Borchert for about one yea
r
a
n
d
h
a
v
e
concluded that a negotiated settlement is the wisest course of a
c
t
i
o
n
.
I
t
appears that the following settlement may be acceptable to Borchert a
n
d
i
s
o
n
e
that I can recommend acceptance of to the City Council:
A) The value of our present loader would be fixed at $48,500.00;
B) Borchert would reimburse the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of
the difference between the established value and the "buy-back" price
or $44,300.00. This amount would be paid back in monthly installments
for a three-year period at 10% interest;
C) Borchert would supply the City with a new set of tires for the
loader; and
D) Borchert would repaint the machine.
Borchert-Ingersoll has not fully accepted the terms of this proposed ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
However, in order to facilitate the negotiation process, I need to k
n
o
w
t
h
a
t
the Council approves of the solution. Unless we are directed otherwise,
I
w
i
l
l
direct Ric Rosow to proceed with these items as the basis of the set
t
l
e
m
e
n
t
.
It is my opinion that this settlement would provide a better soluti
o
n
t
h
a
n
litigating the matter and incurring the associated expenses. The mac
h
i
n
e
i
s
still very serviceable and suits our needs very well.
EAD:ss
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-321
RESOLUTION RECEIVING 100% PETITION,
ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS & PREPARATION
OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
I.C. 52-133
LEGION PARK ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council
:
1. The owners of 100% of the real property abutting
u
p
o
n
a
n
d
t
o
b
e
benefitted from the proposed LEGION PARK ADDITION
h
a
v
e
p
e
t
i
t
i
o
n
e
d
the City Council to construct said improvements a
n
d
t
o
a
s
s
e
s
s
t
h
e
entire cost against their property.
2. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, and upon rec
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
City Engineer, said improvements are hereby orde
r
e
d
a
n
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for said improvements In accordance with City Standards and advertise f
o
r
b
i
d
s
t
h
e
r
e
o
n
.
3. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the City C
l
e
r
k
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
directed to publish a copy of this resolution on
c
e
i
n
t
h
e
o
f
f
i
c
i
a
l
newspaper, and further a contract for constructi
o
n
o
f
s
a
i
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
-
ments shall not be approved by the City Council
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
3
0
d
a
y
s
following publication of this Resolution in the
C
i
t
y
'
s
o
f
f
i
c
i
a
l
newspaper.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
o
n
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
,
1
9
8
7
.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
j
CITY or EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
lDN. PETITION FOR LECAL IMPROVEMENTS
TO THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
The undersigned are all the fee owners of the real prOperty tleneJibed
below and herein petition, or the Eden Prairie City Council to onceed
with making the following described improvements: •
(General Loction)
Sanitary Sewer P.M. Fee •
Watermain
E. P. American Leg_inn Pact *dna
Storm Sewer
Street Paving anc;at Qj.ssmmty_R.QacLjAi.
Other
Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031,.Subd. 3, the undersigned hereby waive any
public hearing to be held on said improvements, and further stat and
agree that the total cost of said improvements shall be srecia/ly as-
sessed against the px:operty described below in accordance with .the
City's special assessment policies. We further understand that the A:4
preliminary, estimated total cost for the said improvements .
-
Street Address or other Legal • Names and addresses of Petitioners
Description of Property to be Served _(.9Ust be o ,::ner5..of
'91 ‘,A1 corp,e.P.4-3r
(Tor City Use)
nAte ReceivCd
Project No.
cnuncil ronsideration
VAC 87-10
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-318
VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS
LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4, BLOCK 2
RAVEN RIDGE
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain drainage and utility easements
described as follows:
Drainage and utility easements as platted on Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block
2, Raven Ridge, Hennepin County, Minnesota recorded in the office of
the Registrar of Titles.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on December 1, 1987 after due notice
was published and posted as required by law;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said easements are not necessary
and have no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
1. Said drainage and utility easements as above described are hereby
vacated.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of the pro-
ceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on December 1, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #87-249
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ROGER'S BODY SHOP, INC.
BY ROGER L. LINDEMAN
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Roger's Body Shop, Inc., by Roger L. Lindeman dated
August 19, 1987, consisting of 1.91 acres into one lot and road right-a-way for
construction of an auto body shop and a copy of which is on file at the City Hall,
Is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and
Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 1st day of December, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
0 E"s-°41 16 Minnesota
0"
c: Department of Transportation
X. e 2055 No. Lilac Drive
District 5
oF TO Golden Valley, Minnesota 5
5
4
2
2
05121X4XX5IIC
593-8403 April 7, 1987
Chris Enger, Planning Director
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MR 55344
Re: S.P. 2744 (TN.. 169) - Plat
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
L
i
n
d
e
m
a
n
Addition located in the NE Quad
r
a
n
t
o
f
R
o
g
e
r
s
Road and T.H. 169 in part of Se
c
t
i
o
n
2
3
,
Twp. 116, Range 22 in City of E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
,
Hennepin County
Dear Mr. Enger:
We are in receipt of the above reference
d
p
l
a
t
f
o
r
o
u
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and
5
0
5
.
0
3
P
l
a
t
s
a
n
d
S
u
r
v
e
y
s
.
A
s
y
o
u
k
n
o
w
,
M
n
/
D
O
T
i
s
planning to upgrade T.H. 169 t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
.
A
s
a
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
i
s
u
p
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
,
i
t
is our plan to minimize direct
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
T
.
H
.
1
6
9
a
s
m
u
c
h
a
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
b
y
e
n
c
o
u
r
-
aging shared driveways, fronta
g
e
r
o
a
d
s
a
n
d
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
w
h
e
r
e
v
e
r
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
I
n
this case, the proposed plat i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
a
c
c
e
s
s
w
h
i
c
h
s
e
r
v
e
s
o
n
l
y
o
n
e
l
o
t
.
T
h
e
existing entrance provides acce
s
s
n
o
t
o
n
l
y
t
o
t
h
i
s
l
o
t
b
u
t
a
l
s
o
t
o
t
w
o
o
t
h
e
r
adjacent lots at an existing s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
T
h
e
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
a
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
would create a situation with t
w
o
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
intersection - this is unaccep
t
a
b
l
e
.
T
h
e
r
e
s
h
o
u
l
d
o
n
l
y
b
e
o
n
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
p
o
i
n
t
f
o
r
all properties and it should be
p
r
o
p
e
r
l
y
a
l
i
g
n
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
i
n
p
l
a
c
e
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
intersection.
We recommend that the developer
o
f
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
w
o
r
k
i
n
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
other adjacent property owners
a
n
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
E
d
e
n
P
e
a
i
r
i
e
t
o
a
g
r
e
e
o
n
a
n
a
c
c
e
s
s
plan which serves the future ne
e
d
s
o
f
a
l
l
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
W
i
t
h
a
l
l
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
development activity in this ar
e
a
a
n
d
o
u
r
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
w
i
d
e
n
i
n
g
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
,
i
t
i
s
e
x
t
r
e
m
e
l
y
important that small one-lot d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
a
r
e
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
d
s
o
t
h
e
y
f
i
t
i
n
t
o
a
n
overall access plan. This coor
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
c
a
r
r
i
e
d
o
n
w
i
t
h
M
r
.
R
i
c
k
D
a
l
t
o
n
,
our project manager for the T.
H
.
1
6
9
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
Thank you for your cooperation
i
n
t
h
i
s
m
a
t
t
e
r
.
W. M. Crawford, P.E.
District Engineer
cc: Steve Keefe - Metropolitan
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
Kenneth Felger - Henn. Co. Sur
v
e
y
o
r
'
s
O
f
f
i
c
e
An Equal Opportunity Employer
0004
ote'Esoti Minnesota .
"1( Department of Transportation
District 5
2055 No. Lilac Drive
Golden Valley. Minnesota 55422
August 11, 1987
Don Uram, Asst. City Planner
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Re: S.P. 2744 (T.H. 169) - Plat Review of Rogers B
o
d
y
S
h
o
p
located east of T.H. 169 near Henn. Co. Vo-Tech Entrance
in part of the SW Quarter of Sect. 23, Twp. 11
6
,
R
a
n
g
e
22, in City of Eden Prairie, Hennepin County
Dear Mr. Uram:
We are in receipt of the above referenced pla
t
f
o
r
o
u
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats a
n
d
S
u
r
v
e
y
s
.
W
e
f
i
n
d
t
h
e
p
l
a
t
a
c
c
e
p
t
-
able for further development with considerati
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
:
- As you know, Mn/DOT is currently planning to
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
T
.
H
.
1
6
9
i
n
t
h
i
s
area. As a part of those plans, every effor
t
i
s
b
e
i
n
g
m
a
d
e
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
the operation and safety of the existing hig
h
w
a
y
.
A
n
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
p
a
r
t
o
f
this improvement is to combine and limit dire
c
t
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
intersections such as the signalized Vo-Tech
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
T
h
e
r
e
f
o
r
e
,
we recommend that the "future road" shown on
t
h
e
p
l
a
t
b
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
w
i
t
h
the propw.ed development and the existing dr
i
v
e
w
a
y
s
b
e
t
i
e
d
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
"future road" so that there is one single app
r
o
a
c
h
t
o
T.H. 169.
- Coordination of this proposed development as
i
t
r
e
l
a
t
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
r
e
c
o
n
-
struction of T.H. 169 should be continued with Mr. James E. Nels
o
n
,
o
u
r
project design engineer. His number is 593-8508.
If you have any questions in regard to this r
e
v
i
e
w
:
p
l
e
a
s
e
c
o
n
t
a
c
t
E
v
a
n
G
r
e
e
n
a
t
593-8537. Thank you for your cooperation in t
h
i
s
m
a
t
t
e
r
.
m. Craw /‘ford;
Since
t
District Engineer
cc: Steve Keefe - Metropolitan Council
Kenneth Felger - Henn. Co. Surveyor's Office
An Equal Opportunity Employer
.43e, .55
8403 1612)593.
CITY OFFICES / 8950 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD / EDEN P
R
A
I
R
I
E
.
MN 55344.2499 / TELEPHONE 16121 937.2282
February 18, 1987
Mr. Roger L. Lindeman
6934 Edgebrook Place
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Mr. Lindeman:
This letter is to inform you of the items which were
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
y
o
u
r
r
e
c
e
n
t
project submittal. This meeting was a
t
t
e
n
d
e
d
b
y
B
r
i
a
n
O
l
s
e
n
a
n
d
R
a
n
d
y
S
t
e
a
r
n
f
r
o
m
Ron Krueger & Associates.
At this meeting, we went over specifi
c
S
t
a
f
f
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
s
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
R
o
g
e
r
'
s
B
o
d
y
Shoo, Inc., proposed along U.S. High
w
a
y
#
1
6
9
.
T
h
e
s
e
i
t
e
m
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
,
b
u
t
n
o
t
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
to:
1. The need for intersection details and
h
o
w
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
r
o
a
d
a
l
i
g
n
s
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
VD-Tech road.
2. The requirement for front yard setba
c
k
s
e
q
u
a
l
l
i
n
g
5
0
f
e
e
t
o
n
U
.
S
.
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
#169 and 25 feet on the future road.
3. The proposed screening of any overh
e
a
d
d
o
o
r
s
m
a
y
m
e
a
n
g
r
e
a
t
e
r
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
o
f
f
the future road.
4. A need for an overall drainage plan
a
n
d
h
o
w
i
t
w
o
r
k
s
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
m
i
n
i
-
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
.
5. The City requirement for a 70-foot r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
6. The proposed extension of water an
d
s
e
w
e
r
l
i
n
e
s
t
o
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
t
o
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
t
property and the adjacent properties.
7. The screening of all parking and loa
d
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
.
Because of these concerns, it has b
e
e
n
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
n
o
t
r
e
a
d
y
t
o
be scheduled for a Planning Com
n
i
s
s
i
o
n
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
a
t
t
h
i
s
t
i
m
e
.
I
f
y
o
u
h
a
v
e
a
n
y
questions regarding any of Staff 's
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
s
,
p
l
e
a
s
e
f
e
e
l
'
f
r
e
e
t
o
c
a
l
l
u
s
a
t
a
n
y
time. Thank you.
ifere ly,
Donald R. Uram
Assistant Planner
DRU/mh
-MEMORANDUM-
TO: Don Uram
FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, P.E.
Director of Public Works
DATE: June 22, 1987
RE:
ROGERS BODY SHOP
An important issue in the Rogers Body Shop proposal is the access
t
o
t
h
e
site and the proposed future roadway east of TH 169. The need
f
o
r
a
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
extension to the east opposite of the Vo-Tech entrance should
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
a "given". Additionally, the MnDot requires that the access
f
o
r
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
be consolidated in one location so as to utilize the detector l
o
o
p
s
t
h
a
t
exists at the intersection and provide safe ingress/egress. T
h
e
r
e
a
p
p
e
a
r
s
to be only two alternatives towards meeting these goals and are
a
s
f
o
l
l
o
w
s
:
A. The proponent may wish to work privately with the two adjacent
property owners to provide a short extension of the proposed
roadway into the site. In this case, I would suggest that the
appropriate right-of-way be dedicated by the proponent and th
a
t
the permanent road section be constructed far enough east of
T
H
169 to provide adequate turn lanes and storage. Thereafter, t
h
e
proponent could bring the driveway into the building in a more
temporary location. The final element of this situation is that
a
special assessment agreement would be necessary to provide for a
financial obligation for future construction.
B. The City Council could receive a petition for a special assess
m
e
n
t
project for the construction of the roadway at this time. In
t
h
i
s
instance, the permanent roadway could be constructed to the
proponents east property line and the appropriate benefit asse
s
s
e
d
against the adjacent property owners.
I very much prefer alternate A. The problem with the second alt
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
i
s
that it will involve specially assessing private property owner
s
w
h
o
m
a
y
o
r
may not recognize the ultimate benefit from having a street in
t
h
i
s
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
Additionally, the cost incurred to the individauls through the s
p
e
c
i
a
l
assessment process may cause financial difficulities. Because
o
f
t
h
e
p
o
t
e
n
-
tial difficulites with special assessment process, the proponen
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
n
o
t
assume that the City Council would order such an improvement.
EAD:ss
,In
'..;‘j
4
1-2
va
PROPOSED SITE
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: August 21, 1987
PROJECT: Roger's Body Shop
LOCATION: West of U.S. #169, south of Williams Mini-storage
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER: Roger Lindeman
REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 Park on approximately 1.62 acres.
2. Preliminary Plat of approximately 1.93 acres into one lot
and road right-of-way.
3. Variances for lot size, width, and required parking, to be
reviewed by Board of Appeals.
Background
This is a continued item from the
August 10, 1987, Planning Commission
meeting. At that time, the Planning
Commission continued the item to
address specific issues raised in
the Staff Report regarding sanitary
sewer disposal, screening of any
outside storage areas, overhead
doors and parking lot. The plans
which have been submitted address
these issues.
Plan Revisions
1. The provision of a screening
plan for any outside storage
area in which vehicles shall
be parked.
In response to the concerns
raised regarding outside
storage of any vehicles, the
proponent has submitted
plans detailing a six-foot
111111111rer
AREA LOCATION MAP
Roger's Body Shop 2 August 21, 1987
high cedar fence which would be installed shoul
d
a
n
y
o
u
t
s
i
d
e
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
occur. The proponent shall agree that this fen
c
e
w
i
l
l
b
e
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
on-site inspection reveal vehicles stored on-si
t
e
.
2. The provision of a screening plan for the over
h
e
a
d
d
o
o
r
s
a
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
along the southern property line.
In response to these concerns, the overhead do
o
r
s
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
f
r
o
m
their previous position to the most southwesterl
y
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
.
The purpose of this was to locate the doors i
n
a
n
a
r
e
a
w
h
e
r
e
t
h
e
e
a
r
t
h
e
n
berm would be at its maximum height. In additi
o
n
,
t
h
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
p
l
a
n
h
a
s
been revised to reflect a continuous coniferous
h
e
d
g
e
r
o
w
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1
3
0
feet in length along the southern property line
.
T
h
i
s
h
e
d
g
e
r
o
w
i
s
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
to provide a year-around screening of the overh
e
a
d
d
o
o
r
s
a
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
.
Past experience has shown that a single hedge ro
w
d
o
e
s
n
o
t
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
screening.
3. The provision of details regarding sanitary sewe
r
d
i
s
p
o
s
a
l
.
Based upon preliminary design, the proponent h
a
s
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
a
"
t
r
e
n
c
h
type" drainfield would be constructed to servic
e
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
T
h
i
s
w
o
u
l
d
include the construction of a drainfield withi
n
b
o
t
h
f
r
o
n
t
y
a
r
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
and, because of the size requirement, involv
e
t
h
e
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
n
i
n
e
parking stalls. With a total requirement o
f
6
7
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
a
l
l
s
,
t
h
e
reduction would decrease the number of stalls
t
o
5
8
.
B
e
c
a
u
s
e
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
stalls are being utilized for the septic system
,
t
h
e
y
c
a
n
n
o
t
b
e
c
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
e
d
as proof-of-parking. The proponent would need to
a
p
p
l
y
f
o
r
,
a
n
d
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
,
a
variance from the parking requirements from t
h
e
B
o
a
r
d
o
f
A
p
p
e
a
l
s
.
I
n
a
worse case scenario, a potential problem could be
t
h
a
t
i
f
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
a
l
l
s
are required, it would involve the elimination o
f
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
i
r
d
r
a
i
n
f
i
e
l
d
.
If this were to occur, there is some question
a
s
t
o
w
h
e
t
h
e
r
o
r
n
o
t
t
h
e
drainfield could function properly. The propon
e
n
t
h
a
s
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
final design for the septic system would be comp
l
e
t
e
d
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
review.
Additional Concerns
As stated in the letter dated August 20, 1987 fr
o
m
M
r
.
R
o
b
e
r
t
W
i
l
l
i
a
m
s
,
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
owner to the .north, concern has been expressed r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
r
u
n
o
f
f
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
proposed development. The previous staff repor
t
s
t
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
a
s
t
o
r
m
s
e
w
e
r
s
y
s
t
e
m
designed for a 10-year storm be included as p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
B
e
c
a
u
s
e
s
t
o
r
m
water runoff affects adjacent parcels, the En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
h
a
s
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
that this issue should be included as part of
t
h
e
f
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
r
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
r
o
a
d
and utility construction.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
If the Planning Commission feels that the specif
i
c
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
a
n
d
s
i
t
e
p
l
a
n
a
s
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
is acceptable, and that the variances requested
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
s
u
b
s
t
a
n
t
i
a
t
e
d
,
t
h
e
n
S
t
a
f
f
would recommend approval of the project based u
p
o
n
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
p
l
a
n
s
d
a
t
e
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
1
9
,
1987, subject to the Staff Report, dated Aug
u
s
t
2
1
,
1
9
8
7
,
a
n
d
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
t
h
e
following conditions:
Roger's Body Shop 3 August 21, 1987
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Provide a petition to the City Engineering Dep
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
feasibility and the construction of the future
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
a
n
d
a
n
y
required utilities.
B. Agree to provide adequate screening along the so
u
t
h
e
r
n
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
line.
C. Agree to install the fence detail as submitted sho
u
l
d
a
n
y
o
u
t
s
i
d
e
storage of vehicles occur.
D. Provide final details regarding the design of th
e
s
e
p
t
i
c
t
a
n
k
a
n
d
drainfield system.
2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
p
l
a
n
s
f
o
r
review by the Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off, utility an
d
e
r
o
s
i
o
n
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
plans for review by the City Engineer.
3. Prior to Grading permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48
h
o
u
r
s
i
n
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
of grading. Stake the construction limits with
e
r
o
s
i
o
n
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
fencing.
4. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
B. Apply for, and receive, variances from the Boar
d
o
f
A
p
p
e
a
l
s
f
o
r
certain requirements as set forth in Chapter 11 in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
l
o
t
s
i
z
e
,
lot width, and parking requirements.
S. Sign a special assessment agreement for the road
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
a
n
y
f
u
t
u
r
e
utility construction including storm sewer.
On the other hand, if the Planning Commission fee
l
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
i
s
parcel is premature based upon the lack of sanita
r
y
s
e
w
e
r
,
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
,
t
h
e
variances requested, or other unresolved issues, t
h
e
n
t
h
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
a
c
t
i
o
n
w
o
u
l
d
be to recommend denial of the project as submitted.
-)6
RCM
lull
'
1,Y _ri-11-12
STAFF REPORT
Planning Commission
Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
August 7, 1987
Rogers Body Shop
West of U.S. 169, South of Al Williams Mini-St
o
r
a
g
e
Roger Lindeman
1. Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 Park
o
n
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1.62 acres.
2. Preliminary Plat of approximately 1.93 acres
i
n
t
o
o
n
e
l
o
t
a
n
d
road right-of-way.
TO:
FROM:
TOUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Background
This site is currently designated on
the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide
Plan for development as an In-
dustrial land use. Adjacent prop-
erties are guided for Industrial to
the north, Low Density Residential
to the east and south, and
Vocational School to the west.
Specific land uses in this area
include vacant property and large
lot single family residential to the
west and south, U.S. 169 and the
Hennepin County Vocational/Technical
School to the west, and Williams
Mini-Storage, zoned 1-2 Park to the
north.
The owner is currently requesting a
Zoning District Change and Pre-
liminary Platting of approximately
1.93 acres into one lot and road
right-of-way to allow for the
development of a 23,911 square foot
autobody repair shop.
AREA LOCATION MAP
Rogers Body Shop 2 August 7, 1987
Site Plan/Preliminary Plat
This 1.9-acre site is currently zoned Rural and is l
o
c
a
t
e
d
d
i
r
e
c
t
l
y
o
p
p
o
s
i
t
e
t
h
e
Hennepin County Vocational/Technical School on
U
.
S
.
1
6
9
.
T
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
i
s
requesting an 1-2 Park zoning classification which r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
a
2
-
a
c
r
e
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
l
o
t
size, width of 200 feet, depth of 300 feet, front yar
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
o
f
5
0
f
e
e
t
,
a side yard setback of 20 feet, and a rear yard setback of 25
f
e
e
t
.
T
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
lot size of 1.68 acres, a lot width of 173 feet, a lot
d
e
p
t
h
o
f
4
6
8
f
e
e
t
,
f
r
o
n
t
y
a
r
d
setback on U.S. 169 of 50 feet, and a 20-foot side yar
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
.
T
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
w
i
l
l
be required to submit an application to the Board of Ap
p
e
a
l
s
f
o
r
a
v
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
minimum lot size of 2 acres and a lot width of 200
f
e
e
t
.
A
c
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
t
o
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
survey, the lot as it currently exists would not meet t
h
e
l
o
t
s
i
z
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
.
The proponet is proposing a 23,911 square foot buildin
g
o
n
t
h
i
s
s
i
t
e
.
B
a
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
a
building footprint of 13,464 square feet, an 18.4% Bas
e
A
r
e
a
R
a
t
i
o
(
B
A
R
)
a
n
d
3
2
.
7
%
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) has been calculated. With the e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
r
o
a
d
,
this lot would be classified as a corner lot and would
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
a
5
0
-
f
o
o
t
f
r
o
n
t
y
a
r
d
setback from U.S. 169 and a 25-foot setback to par
k
i
n
g
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
r
o
a
d
extension. The proposed plans meet the minimum setback
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Based upon a building square footage of 23,911 squa
r
e
f
e
e
t
,
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
h
a
s
calculated a usage breakdown of 1,131 square feet for of
f
i
c
e
;
2
0
,
0
8
3
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
f
o
r
manufacturing; and 2,697 square feet for warehous
e
.
U
s
i
n
g
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
requirements, a total of 67 parking spaces is required.
T
h
e
p
l
a
n
s
d
e
p
i
c
t
a
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
67 surface parking stalls, with additional space for 12
c
a
r
s
p
a
r
k
e
d
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
b
o
d
y
repair area on the upper floor.
Access
Access to this site will be provided by the extensio
n
o
f
a
r
o
a
d
i
n
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
the signalized intersection on U.S. 169 to the east.
P
e
r
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
the road has been designed with a 70-foot right-of
-
w
a
y
c
e
n
t
e
r
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
line. In response to a letter from the Minnesota Dep
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
a
n
d
from conversations with the Engineering Department th
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
h
a
s
s
t
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
he will petition the City for a feasibility report and
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
roadway and any utilities to the eastern-most propert
y
l
i
n
e
(
s
e
e
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
A
a
n
d
B).
The result of the road extension to the east would
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
t
h
e
a
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
3
5
feet of the adjacent property owner's lot. Based upo
n
a
s
t
r
e
e
t
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
o
f
7
0
feet and street width of 38 feet, the owner's garage
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
f
i
v
e
feet from the right-of-way line and 16 feet from the
c
u
r
b
l
i
n
e
.
A
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
l
o
t
size of approximately 10,000 square feet would al
s
o
b
e
r
e
a
l
i
z
e
d
.
I
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
because of the unusual shape of the parcel to the ea
s
t
,
a
r
e
m
n
a
n
t
t
r
a
c
t
m
e
a
s
u
r
i
n
g
approximately 78 feet by 183 feet from the center lin
e
o
f
t
h
e
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
t
o
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
would be created and would be virtually useless to
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
.
After the dedication for the future road, a parcel me
a
s
u
r
i
n
g
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
4
3
f
e
e
t
by 183 feet or 7,869 square feet will remain. Concern
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
r
a
i
s
e
d
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
actual outcome of this piece of property. It would app
e
a
r
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
m
o
s
t
r
e
a
s
o
n
a
b
l
e
use for the property would be to include it as part
o
f
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
proposal, however, this is not possible due to ownershi
p
c
o
n
s
t
r
a
i
n
t
s
.
If the City were to approve the feasibility study an
d
o
r
d
e
r
t
h
e
r
o
a
d
a
n
d
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
improvements, it may be necessary to condemn the property to the sou
t
h
a
n
d
t
h
e
Rogers Body Shop 3 August 7, 1987
created remnant parcel in order to accomplish
t
h
e
r
o
a
d
a
n
d
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
s
t
o
this development.
Grading
High points on this site range from a maximum of
t
h
e
8
7
6
c
o
n
t
o
u
r
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
U.S. 169, to a low point along the most easterl
y
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
a
t
t
h
e
8
4
8
c
o
n
t
o
u
r
elevation. As the plans indicate, this site
s
l
o
p
e
s
i
n
a
n
e
a
s
t
e
r
l
y
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Because no real significant site characteris
t
i
c
s
e
x
i
s
t
o
n
t
h
i
s
s
i
t
e
,
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
involves primarily site preparation includi
n
g
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
p
a
d
a
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
construction. The proposed building on this
s
i
t
e
i
s
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
a
s
a
t
w
o
-
s
t
o
r
y
building with one-story underground which takes
t
h
e
s
l
o
p
e
i
n
t
o
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
T
h
e
majority of the earth work occuring is required t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
h
e
l
o
w
e
r
l
e
v
e
l
through a series of retaining walls and approxim
a
t
e
l
y
8
f
e
e
t
o
f
f
i
l
l
.
T
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
shall submit detailed retaining wall plans for re
v
i
e
w
b
y
t
h
e
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
.
In order to screen the overhead garage doors an
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
,
a
s
e
r
i
e
s
o
f
b
e
r
m
s
are being proposed along the west and southern p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
s
.
T
h
e
b
e
r
m
a
l
o
n
g
U
.
S
.
169 is approximately 3 feet above U.S. 169 an
d
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1
3
f
e
e
t
a
b
o
v
e
t
h
e
finished floor elevation. As site lines indicate
,
t
h
e
b
e
r
m
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
h
i
g
h
e
n
o
u
g
h
t
o
screen the views of the parking in this area an
d
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
n
g
l
e
o
v
e
r
h
e
a
d
d
o
o
r
.
T
h
e
berm along the southern property line ranges from
0
t
o
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
4 feet. Along the south elevation, there would be 3 garage doo
r
s
a
n
d
a
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
1
8
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
a
l
l
s
which would not be screened. In order to scree
n
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
'
s
a
n
d
o
v
e
r
h
e
a
d
doors, alternatives such as relocating the door
s
t
o
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
e
r
n
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
/
o
r
provide a decorative fence have been suggested.
T
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
s
h
a
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
e
t
a
i
l
s
regarding the screening of these areas prior to
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
Utilities
As part of the approval of the Williams Mini-S
t
o
r
a
g
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
i
s
required to extend an 8-inch water line to the
s
o
u
t
h
e
r
n
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
.
W
i
t
h
t
h
e
development of this parcel, the 8-inch wate
r
l
i
n
e
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
e
x
t
e
n
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
terminous point to the southern property line.
A
t
t
h
i
s
t
i
m
e
,
t
h
e
r
e
i
s
n
o
s
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
sewer service available to this site. Because
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
-
t
y
p
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
building, the proponent is required to submit
a
d
e
t
a
i
l
e
d
s
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
s
e
w
e
r
s
y
s
t
e
m
analysis prior to City Council review. It is the
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
'
s
i
n
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
to the sanitary sewer system once it is avail
a
b
l
e
.
T
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
i
s
,
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
shall sign a special assesment agreement for fu
t
u
r
e
s
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
s
e
w
e
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
A
s
discussed in the grading section, a storm
The proposed grading plan depicts a swale along
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
to surface drain the subject property. Accordin
g
t
o
t
h
e
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
r
e
p
o
r
t
,
a
s
e
w
e
r
system designed for a 10-year storm shall be in
c
l
u
d
e
d
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
this proposal. The proponent shall contact th
e
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
t
o
o
b
t
a
i
n
drainage specifications.
Architecture
This building has been designed as a two-story
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
t
a
k
e
a
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
of the slope on the site. The building is re
c
t
a
n
g
u
l
a
r
i
n
s
h
a
p
e
b
a
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
t
h
e
shape of the lot. Primary building materials i
n
c
l
u
d
e
t
r
i
p
l
e
-
s
c
o
r
e
d
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
b
l
o
c
k
and glazed block. The proponent will be requ
i
r
e
d
t
o
s
u
b
m
i
t
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
samples in colors prior to City Council rev
i
e
w
.
T
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
l
s
o
indicate that all rooftop mechanical equipmen
t
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
s
c
r
e
e
n
e
d
b
y
m
e
t
a
l
w
h
i
c
h
Rogers Body Shop
4 August 7, 1987
shall compliment the proposed color of
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
.
Because of the intended use of the bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
,
t
h
e
r
e
a
r
e
a
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
5
o
v
e
r
h
e
a
d
g
a
r
a
g
e
doors to allow access to the buildi
n
g
.
T
h
e
r
e
w
i
l
l
b
e
o
n
e
o
v
e
r
h
e
a
d
g
a
r
a
g
e
d
o
o
r
located along the west elevation, thre
e
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
e
r
n
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
,
a
n
d
o
n
e
o
n
t
h
e
eastern elevation which would provi
d
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
h
e
u
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
f
l
o
o
r
a
r
e
a
.
A
C
i
t
y
Code requirement is the screening of
g
a
r
a
g
e
d
o
o
r
s
a
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
a
l
l
s
f
r
o
m
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
roadways. The proponent will provid
e
d
e
t
a
i
l
i
n
g
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
s
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
review. The proponent will also be
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
p
a
i
n
t
t
h
e
o
v
e
r
h
e
a
d
g
a
r
a
g
e
d
o
o
r
s
t
o
match the brick color in order to dow
n
-
p
l
a
y
t
h
e
d
o
o
r
s
.
Concern has also been raised regar
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
o
f
a
n
y
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
I
f
outdoor storage is proposed, the prop
o
n
e
n
t
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
l
l
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
along the eastern-most portions of
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
w
h
i
l
e
a
l
s
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g
a
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
wall to prevent any views into this
a
r
e
a
.
P
l
a
n
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
f
o
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
p
r
i
o
r
to City Council.
Landscaping
Based on a total square footage of 24
,
8
4
6
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
,
a
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
7
8
c
a
l
i
p
e
r
i
n
c
h
e
s
would be required. The proposed lan
d
s
c
a
p
e
p
l
a
n
d
e
p
i
c
t
s
a
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
o
f
8
1
c
a
l
i
p
e
r
Inches plus a number of shrubs desig
n
e
d
t
o
s
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
p
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
s
.
I
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
provide additional screening of the ov
e
r
h
e
a
d
d
o
o
r
s
,
t
h
e
e
v
e
r
g
r
e
e
n
s
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
a
n
t
h
e
plan should be revised to includ
e
a
n
e
q
u
a
l
s
p
l
i
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
6
,
8
,
a
n
d
1
0
-
f
o
o
t
evergreens. The proponent shall al
s
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
s
h
r
u
b
s
p
l
a
n
t
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
retaining wall to help soften the eff
e
c
t
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
r
e
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
w
a
l
l
s
.
Signage and Lighting
No signage or lighting details have
b
e
e
n
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
i
s
t
i
m
e
.
P
r
i
o
r
t
o
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
permit issuance, the proponent is re
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
g
e
a
n
d
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
d
e
t
a
i
l
s
.
Requirements would include that all
s
i
g
n
a
g
e
m
e
e
t
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
a
n
d
t
h
a
t
a
l
l
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
have no off-site glare.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
There are several remaining outstan
d
i
n
g
i
s
s
u
e
s
t
o
b
e
d
e
a
l
t
w
i
t
h
o
n
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
These include:
A. Resolution of the future roadway c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
a
n
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
utilities.
B. Revision of the grading plan to ref
l
e
c
t
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
b
e
r
m
h
e
i
g
h
t
s
a
l
o
n
g
the southern property line.
C. Revision of the landscaping plan t
o
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
s
h
r
u
b
b
e
r
y
adjacent the retaining walls.
D. Provision of details regarding the b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
a
n
d
c
o
l
o
r
s
t
o
be used.
E. Revision of the utility plan to refl
e
c
t
t
h
e
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
8
-
i
n
c
h
water main from the northern property
l
i
n
e
.
310
Rogers Body Shop 5 August 7, 1987
F. Provision of details regarding sanitary sew
e
r
d
i
s
p
o
s
a
l
.
G. Provision a screening plan for any outsi
d
e
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
a
r
e
a
i
n
w
h
i
c
h
vehicles shall be parked.
H. Provision of a screening plan for the o
v
e
r
h
e
a
d
d
o
o
r
s
a
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
areas along the south property line.
Some of these issues are major, such as
t
h
e
r
o
a
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
a
n
d
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
o
f
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
to the property. Because these issues re
m
a
i
n
u
n
r
e
s
o
l
v
e
d
a
t
t
h
i
s
t
i
m
e
,
S
t
a
f
f
w
o
u
l
d
recomend that there be continuance of thi
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
u
n
t
i
l
t
h
e
s
e
m
a
t
t
e
r
s
a
r
e
r
e
s
o
l
v
e
d
.
:,,,- •
.. ..--!......_ •.‘,._.... • : " .;
''''.',•-•"'",•,^. . .;!.'1..." -....... • 1 ,- /
/ 1 " • i . r t VT+ . , me
" .: '.'•n ; !: .2-.- - '" ,;•':-..tr
',. ' •!4,-... ,,' 1 . • ;; fi •'‘ ..;-,
I ATTACHMENT A
Possible Road Extension
Mit inesCa
Department of Transportation
District 5
2055 No. Lilac Drive
Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
xxxx-xxi
593-8403 April 7, 1987
Chris Enger, Planning Director
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Re: S.P. 2744 (T.H. 169) - Plat Review of Lindema
n
Addition located in the NE Quadrant of Rogers
Road and .T.H. 169 in part of Section 23,
Twp. 116, Range 22 in City'of Eden Prairie,
Hennepin County
Dear Mr. Enger:
We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for
o
u
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Sur
v
e
y
s
.
A
s
y
o
u
k
n
o
w
,
M
n
/
D
O
T
i
s
planning to upgrade T.H. 169 through this area. As
a
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
i
s
u
p
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
,
i
t
is our plan to minimize direct access to T.H. 169 a
s
m
u
c
h
a
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
b
y
e
n
c
o
u
r
-
aging shared driveways, frontage roads and local s
t
r
e
e
t
s
w
h
e
r
e
v
e
r
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
I
n
this case, the proposed plat indicates access whic
h
s
e
r
v
e
s
o
n
l
y
o
n
e
l
o
t
.
T
h
e
existing entrance provides access not only to this
l
o
t
b
u
t
a
l
s
o
t
o
t
w
o
o
t
h
e
r
adjacent lots at an existing signalized intersecti
o
n
.
T
h
e
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
a
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
would create a situation with two entrances within
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
intersection - this is unacceptable. There should
o
n
l
y
b
e
o
n
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
p
o
i
n
t
f
o
r
all properties and it should be properly aligned wi
t
h
t
h
e
i
n
p
l
a
c
e
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
intersection.
We recommend that the developer of this property wo
r
k
i
n
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
other adjacent property owners and the City of Eden
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
t
o
a
g
r
e
e
o
n
a
n
a
c
c
e
s
s
plan which serves the future needs of all propertie
s
.
'
W
i
t
h
a
l
l
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
development activity in this area and our proposed wi
d
e
n
i
n
g
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
,
i
t
i
s
e
x
t
r
e
m
e
l
y
important that small one-lot developments are coord
i
n
a
t
e
d
s
o
t
h
e
y
f
i
t
i
n
t
o
a
n
overall access plan. This coordination should be ca
r
r
i
e
d
o
n
w
i
t
h
M
r
.
R
i
c
k
D
a
l
t
o
n
,
our project manager for the T.H. 169 project.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincexly,
"
' / / t.
W. M. Crawford, P.E.
District Engineer
cc: Steve Keefe - Metropolitan Council
Kenneth Felgcr - Henn. Co. Surveyor's Office
A n Equal Oppottunity Employer ATTACHMENT B
:
D. by Roger L. Lindeman. Request fo
r
District Change Rural to 1-2 on 1.68 acres with variances to be reviewed by the B
o
a
r
d
o
f
A
p
p
e
a
l
s
,
a
n
d
Preliminary Plat of 1.91 acres in
t
o
o
n
e
l
o
t
a
n
d
r
o
a
d
right-of-way for construction of
a
n
a
u
t
o
b
o
d
y
s
h
o
p
.
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
Highway #169 across from the Henn
e
p
i
n
C
o
u
n
t
y
V
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Technical School. A public hearin
g
.
Planner Urns explained the projec
t
t
o
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
told of the numerous meetings the
S
t
a
f
f
h
a
s
h
a
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
and his engineer during the past
s
e
v
e
n
m
o
n
t
h
s
t
o
w
o
r
k
o
u
t
s
o
m
e
o
f
the major issues. These issues in
c
l
u
d
e
d
t
h
e
r
o
a
d
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
east, the screening of overhead
d
o
o
r
s
a
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
sanitary sewer issue. Brian Olson, representing the de
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
,
presented the revised plans in r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
t
o
t
h
o
s
e
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
s
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
by Staff. There will be 67 parki
n
g
s
t
a
l
l
s
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
l
o
t
.
T
h
e
berming will range from approxima
t
e
l
y
1
4
f
e
e
t
a
l
o
n
g
U
.
S
.
1
6
9
a
n
d
t
o
approximately 4-1/2 feet high al
o
n
g
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
.
O
l
s
o
n
showed the Commission the propose
d
p
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
t
h
a
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
used. He stated that the overhead
d
o
o
r
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
completely hidden from U.S. 169 b
u
t
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
p
a
r
t
i
a
l
l
y
v
i
s
i
b
l
e
f
r
o
m
the proposed road extension. The
o
n
l
y
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
screening would be a 6 foot high
fence. .
Dram asked if Olson could address the sanita
r
y
s
e
w
e
r
i
s
s
u
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
Planning Commission. Olson told o
f
p
l
a
n
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
s
e
p
t
i
c
s
y
s
t
e
m
a
n
d
the drain field Which would be loc
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
f
r
o
n
t
y
a
r
d
setbacks along U.S. 169 and the
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
r
o
a
d
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
t
o
p
u
t
i
t
along the south property line. B
e
c
a
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
i
s
,
b
e
r
m
i
n
g
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
south property line may not be p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
T
h
e
b
o
d
y
s
h
o
p
c
a
n
t
h
e
n
be brought into the sewer system onc
e
i
t
i
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
.
I
f
a
n
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
system can not be design, develop
e
r
w
i
l
l
h
a
v
e
t
o
l
o
o
k
a
t
a
h
o
l
d
i
n
g
tank. Paul Struthers, architect,
s
h
o
w
e
d
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
p
l
a
n
s
for the building and office.
Planning Commission Minutes -6- August 10, 1987
Uram stated that based on the revised pla
n
s
s
h
o
w
n
h
e
r
e
t
o
n
i
g
h
t
,
Staff recommendations 8, C, D & E listed
i
n
t
h
e
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
h
a
v
e
been resolved. The issues that remain b
e
f
o
r
e
t
h
e
C
o
s
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
a
r
e
:
A. Resolution of the future roadway con
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
a
n
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
utilities.
F. Provision of details regarding sanitary
s
e
w
e
r
d
i
s
p
o
s
a
l
.
G. Provision of a screening plan for any ou
t
s
i
d
e
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
a
r
e
a
i
n
whi.Ch vehicles shall be parked.
H. Provision of a screening plan for the ov
e
r
h
e
a
d
d
o
o
r
s
a
n
d
parking areas along the south property l
i
n
e
.
The proponent has said that he will petit
i
o
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
t
o
e
x
t
e
n
d
the roadway to the east. Urea stated he
h
a
d
a
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
Mr. Hines, property owner, regarding the
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
.
Mr. Hines has not been receptive to the
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
a
t
t
h
i
s
p
o
i
n
t
.
The road design requires a 35-foot right
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
a
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
o
n
Mr. StmChuek's property. This would put
h
i
s
g
a
r
a
g
e
s
i
x
f
e
e
t
f
r
o
m
the right-of-way line.
Regarding the sanitary sewer disposal, the last idea developer has • presented to Staff doesn't appear accep
t
a
b
l
e
.
S
t
a
f
f
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
i
n
touch with the Engineering Department on
t
h
i
s
i
s
s
u
e
,
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
details would have to be presented so a
p
r
o
p
e
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
c
o
u
l
d
b
e
conducted.
The screening plan for the outside stora
g
e
a
r
e
a
c
a
n
b
e
w
o
r
k
e
d
o
u
t
with Roger Lindeman. This would require
p
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
t
h
a
t
would effectively block the overhead door
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
.
Uram concluded by asking the Planning Com
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
t
o
r
e
v
i
e
w
t
h
e
roadway extension and sanitary sewer issu
e
s
a
n
d
s
a
k
e
s
o
m
e
recommendation as to whether or not a pro
j
e
c
t
l
i
k
e
t
h
i
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
feasible at this time and location.
Chairman SChuCk asked for comments.
Hallett stated it has been four months since anyone has talked
t
o
Mr. Hines. Can the city condemn the rem
n
a
n
t
t
r
a
c
t
?
U
r
e
a
a
n
s
w
e
r
e
d
,
Mt. Hines has said he hasn't seen anythi
n
g
h
a
p
p
e
n
i
n
2
0
y
e
a
r
s
a
n
d
h
e
doesn't think anything is going to happe
n
.
Bye stated if the road is built, it is g
o
i
n
g
t
o
b
e
a
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
t
u
r
n
i
n
g
left off of Highway 11169.
•Litc.;
)
Planning Commission Minutes -7- August 10, 1987
Uram replied that Gene Dietz, Director of Public Works, stated he
would like to see a petition fromEogerLindenan to make sure the
road will be built with this project.
Anderson remarked, once the road is approved it will help Mr. Hines
understand that this is going to happen. It makes sense to get the
road petition moving.
Roger Lindeman addressed the Commission. Stated he has lived in
Eden Prairie all of his life. He would like to put the road in. He
is willing to pay Mt. Hines a decent price for his property. He is willing to work with the City on this project and is willing to pay the price. He asked the Planning Commission for some help on this
project.
Fell asked about long term ownership. Lindeman answered, the body
shop business is changing. People are driving high teat cars and
want to go to a shop where their cars will be repaired properly.
Lindeman stated he definitely plans on long term ownership.
Fell asked about the sanitary sewer situation. Uram said holding tanks are used when there is no other alternative. Fell asked what the cost was. Utam didn't know the details. Fell stated the
Commission should talk about all three issues - road extension,
sanitary sewer and screening - before any decision is made.
Anderson asked if they could get a road extension before they get
the approval of the rest of the project with the Planning Commission
prior to the City Council meeting.
Uram said they have to approve the Whole project, or continue the
whole project. Franzen suggested the developers look at ways to
work out this project without acquiring the property.
Sehuck asked the developers what they could Zo as it stands right
now. The architect showed another way they could take care of the
screening by moving the office from the corner of the building,
moving the two overhead garage doors around so that they would be screened by Highway 1/169. Olson commented on the septic system.
Schuak asked the developers to work on this and present it again at
the next meeting.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Fell, to continue the public
hearing to the August 24, 1987 meeting of the Planning Commission
pending resolution by proponent of the issues raised in the Staff
Report of August 7, 1987 and additional issues raised at this
meeting - screening of the autos, sanitary sewer, screening of the
overhead doors.
Planning Commission Minutes
-8- August 10, 1987
Hallett asked if they were recommending the roa
d
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
actually saying that.
Addendum to the motion - Bye said the Planning
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
s
the petition of the road.
Hallett asked if Staff plans to tall( to Mr. Hines before the next meeting. Utam stated that Staff would contact
M
r
.
H
i
n
e
s
.
Motion carried 5-0-0.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #87-292
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SHADY OAK RIDGE 2ND ADDITION
FOR JOE RUZIC
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Shady Oak Ridge 2nd Addition for Joe Ruzic, dated
October 20, 1987, consisting of 3.08 acres into four single family lots, a copy of
which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions
of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is
herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 1st day of December, 1987.
Giry D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
1,51Z
AREA LOCATION MAP
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
November 6, 1987
Shady Oak Ridge 2nd Addition
West of Old Shady Oak Road, north of Rowland Road
Joe Ruzic
1. Zoning District Change from Rural to R-13.5 on 0.19 acres.
2. Zoning District Amendment within the R1-13.5 district on
2.88 acres.
3. Preliminary Plat of 3.08 acres into 4 single family lots.
Background
This site is currently designated on
the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide
Plan for development as Low Density
Residential. The majority of this
project site is part of the Shady
Oak Ridge Addition, zoned R1-13.5
and approved by the Eden Prairie
City Council in 1986. The proponent
is currently requesting the platting
of 4 single family lots, 3 of which
were included on the original Shady
Oak Ridge Addition preliminary plat.
An additional lot will be platted to
the north of Lot 5, Block 2, which
involves the acquisition of property
from the adjacent property owner.
Site Plan/Preliminary Plat
The proponent is requesting a plat
of 3.08 acres into 4 lots. The
property is currently zoned R1-13.5
having been approved by City Council
action in 1986. The plat involves
the replatting of Lots 5, 6, 7, and
8, Block 2, of the original plat.
Shady Oak Ridge 2nd Addition 2 November 9, 1987
In order to accomplish this, the acquisition of approximately 0.19 acres from the
property owner to the west was required. The only significant change from the
original plan would be an additional lot classified as Lot 2, Block 1.
The proposed grading plan depicts the site being graded from a high of 922 contour
elevation to the low at the 884 contour elevation along the western property line.
The proponent is indicating a slope of 2.5/1 which exceeds the City maximum. The
plans will have to be revised to reflect a 3/1 maximum slope along the rear lot
line. The proposed grading plan does not include the elimination of any significant
trees on the site and all utilities are to be located within Shady Oak Ridge Road.
No additional changes to the plans have been made.
In addition, the proponent is replatting Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, which are the lots
located adjacent Old Shady Oak Road. Plans indicate a wetland area to the west of
this project which does not have an established 100-year floodplain elevation. City
Code requires that all structures shall be placed at an elevation two feet above the
100-year flood frequency level. No building permits shall be released for Lots 3
and 4, Block 1, until a 100-year floodplain elevation has been established and the
building pads meet all applicable requirements.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the project based upon plans dated October 20,
1987, subject to the Staff Report dated November 6, 1987, and subject to the
following recommendations:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Modify the grading plan to reflect a maximum 3/1 slope on Lots 1 and
2, Block 3.
B. Provide proof of ownership of the proposed acquisition of property
from the adjacent property owner.
2. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall pay the appropriate Cash
Park Fee.
3. Prior to the release of any permits for Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, the 100-year
floodplain elevation must be established.
Eden Prairie Planning Commission November 9, 1987 rage Nine
C. SHADY OAK RIDGE 2ND ADDITION, by Joe Ruzic. Request for
Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 0.19 acres.
Zoning District Amendment within the R1-13.5 on 2.88 acres
and Preliminary Plat of 3.08 acres into 4 single family
lots. Location: West of Old Shady Oak Road, north of
Rowland Road. A public hearing.
Eden Prairie Planning Commission November 9, 1987 Page Ten
Ron Krueger, representing Joe Ruzic requested approval for plat
of 3.08 acres into 4 lots.
Uram reported this is a replat of the Shady Oak Ridge original
plat and recommended approval based on staff recommendations on
page 2 of the Staff Report. Prior to release of permits,
floodplain elevations must be established.
Proponent responded they will be working with City Engineers on
that issue.
Hallett inquired of tree inventory on this proposal.
Uram informed Commission the original Shady Oak Ridge project in
1984 proposing townhomes, was not required to submit tree inventory.
Proponent responded that in the second addition, a tree
inventory was conducted and trees replaced.
Uram informed Commission that the other agenda item addressing
grading plan for the entire project has been withdrawn.
Proponent, in reference to grading plan agenda item, stated it
was unfavorable for approval and time did not permit revisions,
and they were advised to withdraw at this time.
Ruebling expressed concern of the hill and communicated to
Commission they look at future proposals more careful to prevent
this from happening again.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Hallett to close the
public hearing.
Motion carried 6-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Ruebling to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Joe Ruzic for Zoning
District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 0.19 acres, and Zoning
District Amendment within the R1-13.5 District on 2.88 acres,
all to be known as Shady Oak Ridge 2nd Addition, based on piano
and written materials dated October 22, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated November 6, 1987.
Motion carried 6-0-0
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Ruebling to recommend to City Council approval of the request of Joe Ruzic for Preliminary Plat of 3.08 acres into four single family lots to
Eden Prairie Planning Commission - November 9, 1987 - Page Eleven
be known as Shady Oak Ridge 2nd Addition, based on plans and
written materials dated October 22, 1987, subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report dated November 6, 1987.
Motion carried 6-0-0
D. SHADY OAK RIDGE - REVISED GRADING PLAN, by Joe Ruzic.
Request for grading plan revisions. Location: West of Old
Shady Oak Road, north of Rowland Road.
Proponents representative advised the planning commission
that this proposal has been withdrawn.
V. OLD BUSINESS
None
VI. NEW BUSINESS
Franzen distributed documents submitted by Wooddale Church with
plans for expansion. Before they spend additional time and
expense, they are requesting Commission's feedback on this
project. This will be a discussion item at the next meeting.
They were advised by City Staff to meet with sub-divisions of
Willow Creek and Golden Ridge Estates.
Fell suggested that Planning Commission go to the creek area
and bring a camera for documentation. When responding, these
issues should be addressed separately: 1) Purgatory Creek; 2)
Fillippe Grading; 3) Staff Report Facts.
Hallett suggested Staff begin to prepare a long range plan and
determine what will go in the southwest Eden Prairie area for
the next five years. This will prepare and strengthen City and
Planning Commission decisions. The time is right for a
framework describing arrangement of the land uses.
VII. PLANNER'S REPORT
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 10:49 PM. Motion was made by Bye and
seconded by Dodge.
Respectfully submitted,
Sue Masear Anderson
7
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #87-312
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF JENKINS ADDITI
O
N
F
O
R
JOHN JENKINS
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follow
s
:
That the preliminary plat of Jenkins Addition for John Jenk
i
n
s
,
d
a
t
e
d
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
3
0
,
1987, consisting of 5.61 acres into two lots and one outlo
t
,
a
c
o
p
y
o
f
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
o
n
file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with th
e
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
E
d
e
n
Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments
t
h
e
r
e
t
o
,
a
n
d
i
s
h
e
r
e
i
n
approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 1st day of
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
,
1
9
8
7
.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
3,(A
PROPOSED SITE
AREA LOCATION MAP
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: November 6, 1987
PROJECT: Jenkins Addition
LOCATION: North of Research Road, east of Mitchell Road
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER: John Jenkins
REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.61 acres.
2. Preliminary Plat of 5.61 acres into 2 lots and 1 outlot.
Background
This site is currently designated on
the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide
Plan for development as Low Density
Residential. Surrounding land use
designations within this area
include Low Density Residential to
the north, east, and west, and
Public Open Space to the south.
Specific land uses include Ridgewood
West zoned RI-13.5 to the north and
east, the proposed Starrwood
Addition, zoned R1-13.5 to the west;
and Research Road and Starring Lake
Park to the south. The proponent is
requesting a preliminary plat of a
5.61-acre tract into 2 lots and 1
outlot.
Site Plan/Preliminary Plat
The site plan depicts a division of
a 5.61-acre tract into 2 lots and 1
outlot. The proponent is requesting
the R1-13.5 zoning district in which
all of the lots meet the minimum
requirements. Lot sizes range from
29,743 square feet for Lot I to
33,567 square feet for Lot 2. The
Jenkins Addition 2 November 9, 1987
remaining outlot on which there is an existing home contains 152,891 square feet or
3.51 acres.
Access to this site would be provided from Research Road and Flesher Circle which is
located on the property line between the Jenkins Addition and the Starrwood
Addition. The proponent is dedicating the 25 feet of right-of-way required for the
completion of Flesher Circle. Because Research Road is currently unimproved, the
proponent will be required to sign a special assessment agreement for the upgrading
of Research Road. Access to the individual home sites would be by a 50-foot private
road easement located along the northern property line which is the location of the
existing driveway. A cross-access agreement is required with this private road
easement.
Grading/Utilities
This site slopes in a southwesterly direction from a high point in the northeast
corner at the 890 elevation to a low point adjacent Research Road at the 824 contour
elevation. Because the driveway and the existing home have set building elevations,
there are minor amounts of grading to allow for the construction of the two building
pads and the construction of Flesher Circle. Both building pads are designed as
walk-outs which take into consideration the slopes on the site.
There are 464 caliper inches of significant trees on-site, none of which are to be
removed with this development. The proponent will be required to place snow fencing
around the wooded areas.
All utilities are located in Research Road. There is a 12-inch watermain and the
proposed Red Rock Interceptor to be located within Research Road. As the plans
depict, there will be two manholes with pipe extensions across Research Road to
provide utility service to this property. The proponent has indicated four sanitary
sewer services along the north side of the street. Two of the services would be for
Lots 1 and 2 while the other two services are provided for the future subdivision of
the 3.61-acre tract. In addition, the existing house will have to connect to
sanitary sewer when the septic system fails.
Finally, with the exception of the outlot dedication, this subdivision is subject to
the conditions stated in a letter dated October 23, 1987, from Mr. Carl J. Jullie,
City Manager, to Mr. Frank Cardarelle (see attached).
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the request for Preliminary Plat of 5.61 acres
into 2 lots and 1 outlot, based on plans dated October 29, 1987, subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report dated November 6, 1987, letter dated October 23,
1987, and subject to the following conditions:
1. Concurrent with Final Plat, proponent shall submit a cross-access agreement
for Lots 1 and 2, and Outlot A.
2. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall pay the appropriate Cash
Park Fee.
3. Prior to the release of the Final Plat, proponent shall enter into a special
assessment agreement with the City of Eden Prairie for the upgrading of
Research Road.
CITY OFFICES 17600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE / EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344-2499 / TELEPHONE (612) 937.226
2
October 23, 1987
Mr. Frank Cardarelle
Cardarelle & Associates, Inc.
8110 Eden Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Subject: Starwood Subdivision
Dear Frank:
Pursuant to our meeting on October 20th, the following is my
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
t
o
your concerns.
Sewer Hook-up: The Metro Waste Control Commission will det
e
r
m
i
n
e
w
h
e
n
connEffEns can be made to their Interceptor sewer pipe whic
h
i
s
y
e
t
t
o
b
e
constructed. It seems reasonable to assume that when the pipe
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
past the point where your connection will be made that they w
i
l
l
a
l
l
o
w
s
u
c
h
connection even though the balance of the pipe upstream is not
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
.
T
h
e
City Engineering staff will determine when the lateral sewer sys
t
e
m
s
y
o
u
w
i
l
l
be building are ready for individual sewer hook-ups.
Feasibility Report For Riverview Road and Mitchell Road: The Ci
t
y
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
has been directed to TiOude the ResearcE —Roao project -7F the Feasibility report already initiated for Mitchell Road. At this time it is n
o
t
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
t
o
say exactly when this Feasibility report will be considered by the
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
,
b
u
t
probably not until February or March of next year. It is po
s
s
i
b
l
e
t
o
e
x
p
e
c
t
completion of the base course on the roadways by October/No
v
e
m
b
e
r
o
f
1
9
8
8
.
This project will involve substantial cost to the City and
w
e
h
a
v
e
n
o
t
y
e
t
identified a funding source. Occupancy of homes in you subdivis
i
o
n
w
i
l
l
b
e
t
i
e
d
to having proper road access, bitumious base or a very stable gra
v
e
l
b
a
s
e
w
i
l
l
be required prior to occupancy of homes.
Developer Builds Road In Lieu of Assessments: It is possibl
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
Developer to 01 -FT fLITT:WiEh section of Research Road over a portion of the
frontage in lieu of Special Assessments under a City proj
e
c
t
.
I
t
s
e
e
m
s
,
however, that it would be much better to have a single contrac
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
e
n
t
i
r
e
project rather than splitting it up. You should work with Ge
n
e
D
i
e
t
z
i
f
y
o
u
wish to pursue this idea.
Outlot Dedication: The Planning staff indicates that the pond in
O
u
t
l
o
t
8
is designated by the DNR as public waters, and therefore the
C
i
t
y
'
s
S
h
o
r
e
l
i
n
e
Ordinance applies. This means that the 150 foot setback is re
q
u
i
r
e
d
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
to plat the lots adjacent to these public waters. Dedication o
f
t
h
e
O
u
t
l
o
t
t
o
the City is at your option.
I trust that the foregoing addresses the concerns we discussed.
Sinceretc)(
(\. ,
Carl J. Uullie
City Manager
CJ:pb
cc: Gene Dietz
rhric Pnnor
MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
Monday, November 9, 1987
City Council Chambers
7:30 PM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Ed Schuck, Charles Ruebling, Robert Hallett,
Julianne Bye, Douglas Fell, Christine Dodge
MEMBERS ABSENT: Richard Anderson
STAFF PRESENT: Michael Franzen, Senior Planner; Don Uram, Assistant
Planner; Sue Anderson, Recording Secretary
Pledge of Allegiance -- Roll Call
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION:
Motion was made by Ruebling and seconded by Bye to approve the
agenda as printed.
Motion carried 6-0-0
( II. MEMBERS REPORTS
None
III. MINUTES
Chairman Schuck requested a motion for approval of minutes of
the October 26, 1987 meeting. Commissioner Hallett requested a
change in the minutes on page 9, paragraph 1, to read "parking
lot at Eden Point Project that is totally..." in lieu of
"parking lot at Wilson Learning Center that is totally...".
MOTION:
Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Fell to approve the
minutes of the October 26, 1987 Planning Commission meeting as
presented and changed.
Motion carried 4-0-2
IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
A. JENKIN'S ADDITION, by John Jenkins. Request for Zoning
District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.61 acres, and
Preliminary Plat of 5.61 acres into 2 lots and one outlot.
Location: North of Research Road, south of Ridgewood West.
A public hearing.
Eden Prairie Planning Commission - November 9, 1987 - rage Two
Frank Cardarelle, surveyor, representing John Jenkins-proponent,
(present) set forth the request of R1-13.5 zoning district for 2
lots and one outlot. Size for Lot 1 is 29,743 sq.ft., and
33,567 sq.ft. for Lot 2. The outlot, where there is presently a
home, is 152,891 sq.ft. or 3.51 acres. No variances are
required, and utilities and water are located in Research Road.
Don Uram, Assistant Planner, recommended approval by the
Commission subject to conditions on page two of the Staff Report
referring to special assessment agreement for upgrading Research
Road and all recommendations in Carl Jullie's letter dated
10-23-87.
Responding to public hearing, Terry Kukla, 8806 Knollwood Drive,
summarized concern 1) if driveway presently on lot will remain
or become a public street; 2) what are the limitations on the
height of a dwelling; 3) his view of Staring lake will be lost
from his home.
Proponent replied that the property is 15 to 20 feet below
Kukla's home. Uram responded that maximum height in accordance
with city code is thirty feet from driveway level. Proponent
believes it will not block Kukla's view of lake.
Commissioner Hallett suggested Kukla visit with Cardarelle and
look closer at site lines. Resident was advised he could be
heard again at City Council meeting.
Bob Dehler, 8810 Knollwood Drive, stated concern 1) sewer and
water and where is it coming from; 2) on what basis does
Commission accept the project; 3) can they build before nanitary
sewers are installed; 4) how can they access area to develop
when roads are poor condition.
In reference to basis of project, Staff replied the land is
guided for Low Density Residential and zoned rural. The current
project is consistent with the guide plan zoning classification
and adjacent land uses.
Developer can build on the property but sanitary sewer must be
in place before occupancy of dwelling. Connection will be from
sanitary sewer trunk on Research Road. Just to the west is
Starrwood Development where water system will pass through and
continuing on to Research and Mitchell Road. The roads shall be
upgraded, subject to the contents of the feasibility report.
Road improvements will be concurrent with this project.
Proponent reiterated Uram's statement that it is their intention
to upgrade roads.
Chair Schuck suggested Dehler speak with proponent to clarify
specifications of the project.
Eden Prairie Planning Commission - November 9, 1987 Page Three
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Fell to close public
hearing.
Motion carried 6-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Bye and second by Fell to recommend to the
City Council approval of the request of John Jenkins for Zoning
District Change from rural to R1-13.5 for 5.61 acres to be known
as the Jenkins Addition, based on plans dated October 29, 1987,
subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated
November 6, 1987.
Motion carried 6-0-0
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Fell to recommend to the
City Council approval of the request of John Jenkins for
Preliminary Plat of 5.61 acres into two lots and one outlet to
be known as the Jenkins Addition, based on plans dated October
29, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report
dated November 6, 1987.
Motion carried 6-0-0
38881
38882
38883
38884
38885
38886
i"8887
_ j8888
38889
38890
38891
38892
38893
38894
38895
38896
38897
38898
38899
38900
38901
38902
38903
38904
38905
38906
38907
38908
38909
38910
38911
18912
METRO PRINTING INC
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
ICMA RETIREMENT CORP
THE GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO
PERA
INTERNAT'L UNION OF OPERATING ENG
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PERA
UNITED WAY
CITY-COUNTY CREDIT UNION
NORWEST BANK - HOPKINS
LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER OF ICB0
AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV
DANNY BURKE
CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO
CASH
GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
NSP
NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO
PAUSTIS & SONS CO
ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
PRIOR WINE CO
QUALITY WINE CO
THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO
SHARON WISER
CLINT ANDERSON
RONALD MARKGRAF
JOHN STEVENSON
COSTECO
TIRE TOWN
DECEMBER 1,1987
38861 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
38862 NORTHWESTERN BELL
38863 AT&T
38864 ROBIN ABRAHAM
38865 JAMIE COSTELLO
38866 JOHN SHANNON
38867 DERWOOD TWIGG
38868 CYNTHIA ANDERSON
38869 LISA ESPINOSA
38870 CORY SHANNON
38871 VOID OUT CHECK
38872 =TOO
38873 MAILBOXES ETC.
38874 PETTY CASH
38875 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
38876 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
38877 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO
38878 EDEN PRAIRIE TRASHTRONICS
38879 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS
38880 KRAEMER'S HOME CENTER
272 VAN DRIVER FEE - SENIOR CENTER
SERVICE
SERVICE
REFUND - EXERCISE CLASS
REFUND - EXERCISE CLASS
REFUND - SKATING LESSONS
REFUND- SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND - SKATING LESSONS
REFUND - SKATING LESSONS
REFUND - SKATING LESSONS
SUPPLIES-ROUND LAKE CONCESSION
POSTAGE - COMMUNITY CENTER
PETTY CASH
OCTOBER '87 SALES TAX
OCTOBER '87 FUEL TAX
SUPPLIES - LIQUOR STORE
OCTOBER '87 TRASH DISPOSAL
EQUIPMENT REPAIRS - SEWER DEPT
-BATTERIES/TAPE/CLOTHESLINE/GAS STABILIZER
-SPRAYER/TWINE/NOZZLE/SHEETING-WATER DEPT/
STREET MAINTENANCE
FORMS - POLICE DEPT
UNIFORMS - FIRE DEPT
PAYROLL 11-13-87
PAYROLL 11-13-87
PAYROLL 11-13-87
PAYROLL 11-13-87
PAYROLL 11-13-87
PAYROLL 11-13-87
PAYROLL 11-13-87
PAYROLL 11-13-87
PAYROLL 11-13-87
PAYROLL 11-13-87
CONFERENCE -BUILDING DEPT
SERVICE
REFUND - SKATING LESSONS
WINE
CHANGE FUND - COMMUNITY SERVICES
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
SERVICE
SERVICE
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
REFUND - SKATING LESSONS
SERVICE - POLICE DEPT
SERVICE - POLICE DEPT
SERVICE - POLICE DEPT
SUPPLIES - ROUND LAKE CONCESSION
-SUPPLIES-STARING LAKE PARK/INNER TUBES-
ROUND LAKE MARINA
3.60
2803.65
352.51
22.65
21.75
19.00
18.00
22.00
19.00
23.00
0.00
200.00
13.42
68.49
25014.65
350.03
8.88
412.50
50.22
217.90
101.00
598.50
43397.94
11661.91
1008.48
4534.00
90.00
805.00
22862.70
158.88
925.13
800.00
85.00
10.65
13.60
43.40
25.00
9046.23
9209.61
13734.04
1000.19
322.80
9388.02
625.17
5266.90
17.10
20.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
320.00
290.00
16615240
DECEMBER 1,1987
38913
38914
(:
38915
38916
38917
38918
38919
38920
38921
38922
38923
38924
38925
38926
38927
38928
38929
38930
38931
38932
38933
38934
38935
38936
38937
38938
38939
38940
( 1941
-38942
38943
38944
38945
38946
38947
38948
38949
38950
38951
38952
38953
38954
38955
38956
38957
38958
38959
38960
38961
38962
38963
38964
38965
q8966
3967
AT&T OONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV
PRESERVE BEN FRANKLIN
HOPKINS POSTMASTER
DOUGLAS EDWARD ANDREWS
LANCE BRACE
DUANE CABLE
SPENCER L CONRAD
GENE E DAHLKE
RICHARD R DEATON
LARRY DOIG
FRANKLIN PAUL ELLERING
GEORGE ESBENSON
CHARLES FERN
DAVID GILMORE
CHARLES A GOBLE
ROBERT R GRANT
RICK HAMMERSCHMIDT
ROBERT HAUGEN
JOHN T H)BBS
WALTER C JAMES
JAIMES GLENN JOHNSON
MICHAEL W JOHNSON
RONALD JOHNSON
DAVID T KING
PENNY ELLEN KING
MARVIN A LAHTI
MAILAND EARL LANE
BRADLEY E LARSON
JAMES W LINDGREN
LOWELL D LUND
BRIAN GILL MCGRAW
REGAN L MASSEE
PHILIP MATHIOWETZ
JAMES LEE MATSON
GARY LEE MEYER
THOMAS MONTGOMERY
CURTIS OBERLANDER
KATHLEEN O'CONNOR
KEITH ANDREW OLSON
WANDA OVERBEY
JOHN EDWARD PAFKO
JAMES PELTIER
TIMOTHY JOHN PELTIER
DOUGLAS LEE PLEHAL
JERRY PRODOEHL
GARY LEE RADTKE
JOHN D RIEGERT
JOHN D ROCHFORD
MICHAEL JOHN ROGERS
TIMOTHY A SATHER
CHARLES SCHAITBERGER
GERALD M SCHWANKL
SCOTT GERALD SCHRAM
LEE ALLEN SCHNEIDER
JAMES OLIVER SHAW
SERVICE
SUPPLIES - SENIOR PROGRAMS
POSTAGE METER - CITY HALL
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
6.75
21.34
5000.00
750.00
605.00
570.00
1990.00
1105.00
1680.00
609.00
575.00
1404.00
1055.00
840.00
1690.00
1260.00
1320.00
1105.00
1435.00
785.00
1190.00
1062.00
3420.00
120.00
10.00
940.00
730.00
1065.00
670.00
1425.00
655.00
855.00
1860.00
1035.00
1575.00
1975.00
2530.00
2035.00
1210.00
1345.00
1655.00
1375.00
1655.00
2190.00
426.00
745.00
1325.00
1295.00
795.00
2140.00
2025.00
785.00
833.00
1355.00
970.00
6906209
'3 10d,
DECEMBER 1,1987
38968 TODD SKATRUD
38969 JOHN J SKRANKA
38970 GENE R SPANDE
38971 MARC LEWIS THIELMAN
38972 RODNEY JAY UTING
38973 THOMAS D WILSON
38974 AABBEE/MAIDCO INC
38975 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC
38976 AIRLIFT DOORS INC
38977 ALDY GRAPHIC SUPPLY INC
38978 AMEX TIRE
38979 EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOC INC
38980 ARTSIGN MATERIALS CO
38981 ASPLUND COFFEE CO INC
38982 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC
38983 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC
38984 KELLY LYN BAUER
38985 BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY
38986 LOIS BOETTCHER
38987 BOYUM EQUIPMENT INC
38988 LEE BRANDT
38989 ANDREA BROSCH
38990 BUSINESS FURNITURE
38991 CARGILL SALT DIVISION
38992 CARLSON & CARLSON ASSOC
38993 CARLSONS LAKE STATE EQUIP CO
38994 CLIMATE MAKERS INC
38995 CLUTS O'BRIEN STROTHER ARCHITECTS
38996 ROBERT W COMPTON INC
38997 CONSTRUCTION FABRICS INC
38998 CONTECH CONST PRODUCTS INC
38999 CORNERSTONE ADVOCACY SERVICE
39000 CRYSTALPLEX PLASTICS INC
39001 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY
39002 CURTIS INDUSTRIES
39003 VOID OUT CHECK
39004 DALCO
39005 OEM CON LANDFILL INC
39006 DIXIE PETRO CHEM INC
39007 DON EVE & SONS
39008 DOUGLAS CORP
39009 JENNIFER DRESSEN
39010 E P ROBINS DELI
39011 EARLS ART & DRAFTING SUPPLIES
'9012 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
,3013 CITY OF EDINA
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
-CARPET & UPHOLSTERY CLEANING DUE TO JULY
STORM DAMAGE - SENIOR CENTER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
DOOR REPLACED-COMMUNITY CENTER
FILM/LETTERING-PLANNING DEPT & CITY HALL
TIRE DISPOSAL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-PLAYSTRUCTURES-EDENBRCCK PARK& EDEN LAKE
SCHOOL/PARK
FILM-PLANNING DEPT
CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMNITY CENTER
BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE
-LAMP/POWER STEERING FLUID/BROOMS/ICE
-SCRAPERS/FUSES/WASHER FLUID/BATTERY
-PROTECTORS/BULBS/SEALS/BATTERY/WHEEL
-WEIGHTS/HOSES/WIPERS/WASHER PUMP-
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
-FILM PROCESSING-WATER DEPT/POLICE DEPT/
PLANNING DEPT/FORESTRY DEPT/MUNICIPALS
-PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING
COMMUNITY SERVICES
-CLAMPS/INTAKE TUBES/BALL SWIlaL/PAINT/
TUBE CARRIERS-SEWER DEPT
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD
RACQUETBALL INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD
TABLE-WATER DEPT
SALT-STREET MAINTENANCE
CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT
SPINDLE/TUBES-FORESTRY DEPT
AIR COMPRESSOR REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER
SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER
SERVICE-HOMEWARD HILLS PARK
EROSION SUPPLIES-JULY STORM DAMAGE
CULVERT BANDS-DRAINAGE CONTROL
SERVICE FOR BATTERED WOMEN
PLEXIGLASS-COMMUNITY CENTER
QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT
CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT
CLEANING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
DUMPING CHARGES-STREET DEPT & PARKS DEPT
CHLORINE-WATER DEPT
SEED-STREET MAINTENANCE
REFUND-OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL
MILEAGE
EXPENSES-CITY HALL
OFFICE SUPPLIES-PLANNING DEPT
EXPENSES-ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
OCTOBER 87 WATER TESTS
1690.00
1270.00
950.00
1885.00
744.00
740.00
112.57
835.70
775.00
80.65
114.00
7500.00
13.45
131.80
841.36
1536.13
40.50
584.70
31.00
1612.86
202.50
58.00
449.00
677.45
295.00
184.09
306.40
3836.64
2575.00
122.40
15.81
1500.00
220.00
3285.63
240.28
0.00
235.79
102.00
820.00
90.00
7107.20
68.32
45.00
4.59
7.00
103.50
4404032
DECEMBER 1,1987
LEASE AGREEMENT - WATER DEPT 60.00
FAN COVER FOR MOTOR-WATER DEPT 138.08 NOVEMBER 87 EXPENSES 165.00
SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER REMODELING 4238.00
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 523.24
REFUND-BUILDING PERMIT 2050.00 MILEAGE 109.00
NOVEMBER 87 EXPENSES 165.00 HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 80.00
RADIO REPAIRS-FIRE DEPT/STREET DEPT 347.32
39 TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 2509.31 LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 86.82
FLUORIDE-WATER DEPT 104.87 -LIMESTONE-STREET DEPT/PARK DEPT/JULY 2602.65 STORM DAMAGE
-WINDSHIELDS & DOOR GLASS-EQUIPMENT 375.23 MAINTENANCE
SERVICE-PLANNING DEPT 74.00
WASTE DISPOSAL-FORESTRY DEPT 125.00 MOTOR REPAIRS-ICE ARENA 138.46
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 93.00 CASH REGISTER TAPE-COMMUNITY CENTER 65.88
-ELECTRICAL PROTECTION MOTORS INSTALLED IN 990.00 WELL HOUSES - WATER DEPT
-OCTOBER & NOVEMBER 87 MAINTENANCE 179.16 AGREEMENT
STARTER REPLACED IN FIRE TRUCK-FIRE DEPT 608.32 -OFFICE SUPPLIES/FILES/BOOKCASE-WATER
881.12 DEPT-FILE/BOOKCASE-WATER PLANT ADDITION
OCTOBER & NOVEMBER 87 EXPENSES 643.48 -TIMBERS/PLYWOOD-STREET DEPT/PARK DEPT/ 1804.72 SENIOR CENTER
BALL CARRIER-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS
VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT
4 WAY VALVE-WATER DEPT
NOVEMBER 87 EXPENSES
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
-JULY/AUGUST & SEPTEMBER 87 SERVICE-
COMMUNITY CENTER LITIGATION
COVERALLS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
OCTOBER 87 SERVICE
DUMPING CHARGES-STREET MAINTENANCE
-TIMBERS/PLYWOOD-PARK DEPT/COMMUNITY
CENTER/JULY STORM DAMAGE
-SHOP PRESS/CABINET/ADAPTORS/SOCKETS/
-RAIL/WRENCH HOLDERS/SIDE CUTTERS-
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
4 CHAIRS-PLANNING DEPT & ASSESSING DEPT
OCTOBER 87 SAC CHARGES
CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE
OFFICE PANEL - CITY HALL
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
NOVEMBER 87 PAGER SERVICE-WATER DEPT
39014 C & NW TRANS CO
39015 ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL SERVICES IN
39016 CHRIS ENGER
39017 ENGO GENERAL CONTRACTORS
39018 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY
39019 FRONTIER MIDWEST HOMES CO
39020 LYNDELL FREY
39021 JOHN FRANE
39022 DARRELL GEDNEY
39023 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC
39024 GOODYEAR TRUCK TIRE CENTERS
39025 W W GRAINGER INC
39026 HACH CO
39027 HARDRIVES
39028 HARMON GLASS
39029 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
39030 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
39031 HCLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC
39032 MICHAEL J HOSTETLER
39033 HUGIN SWEDA INC
39034 IDEAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
39035 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC
39036 INTERSTATE DIESEL PRODUCTS INC
39037 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC
(-.19038 CARL JULLIE
39039 JUSTUS LUMBER CO
39040 KOKESH ATHLETIC SUPPLIES INC
39041 MARY KOTTKE
39042 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY
39043 LAKELAND ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT
39044 ROBERT LAMBERT
39045 LANCE
39046 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD
39047 LEEF BROS INC
39048 LOGIS
39049 LOUISVILLE LANDFILL INC
39050 LYMAN LUMBER COMPANY
39051 MIKE MARUSHIN
39052 METRO SYSTEMS FURNITURE
39053 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMIS
39054 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO
39055 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
39056 HERMAN MILLER INC
19057 JODI L MILLER
4068 MINNESOTA COMMUNICATIONS CORP
19.96
48.00
277.93
237.71
165.00
66.40
4646.25
80.29
5528.13
72.00
350.47
3936.00
464.60
100519.65
428.76
492.24
131.60
278.38
51.50
13695253
DECEMBER 1,1987
39059 MN BLUEPRINT
39060 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC
39061 M-V GAS COMPANY
39062 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP
39063 MOTOROLA INC
39064 MURRAY SANDLER SKATE & SPORT SUPP
39065 MY CHEESE SHOP
39066 NATIONAL SCREENPRINT
39067 OAK PARK BUSINESS CENTER
39068 OFFICE PRODUCTS
39069 ORION RESEARCH INC
39070 PACE LAEORATORIES INC
39071 PERSONNEL DESISIONS INC
39072 CONNIE L PETERS
39073 PLANT EQUIPMENT INC
39074 DOUGLAS LEE PLEHAL
39075 Pt S SERVICE CORP
39076 POMMER COMPANY INC
39077 W J EBERTZ
39078 MARV POST
39079 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
39080 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN
39081 PRINT SHACK
39082 R & R SPECIALTIES INC
9083 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CO
39084 ROAD RESCUE INC
39085 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO
39086 BETH SAUGEN
39087 ERIC SAUGEN
39088 PATRICK SCHISSEL
39089 KEVIN SCHMIEG
39090 DALE SCHMIDT
39091 VOID OUT CHECK
39092 SHARON MORGANS NOVELTIES
39093 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP
39094 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC
39095 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
39096 SFS COMPANIES
39097 STATE TREASURER
39098 RAYMOND & EDITH STODOLA
39099 STS CONSULTANTS LTD
39100 SULLIVANS SERVICES INC
39101 SUN ELECTRIC CORP
39102 NATALIE SWAGGERT
39103 TENNESSEE CHEMICAL CO
39104 TITLE SERVICES
'9105 TURF SUPPLY 00
3106 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
PRINTS-PLANNING DEPT
ADS-LIQUOR STORE
SERVICE
SERVICE
INSTALLATION OF RADIOS-FIRE DEPT
SKATE LACES & TONGUES - ICE ARENA
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
T-SHIRTS-COMMUNITY CENTER
REFUND-OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL
CALCULATOR-LIQUOR STORE
LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT
SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDITION
SERVICE-COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY
MILEAGE
PLUG VALVE-WATER DEPT
BLACKTOP TENNIS COURTS-EDDIBROOK PARK
CLEANING SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
TROPHY-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS
-SERVICE-HOMEWARD HILLS PARK/WILLOW PARK/
EDEN LAKE PARK
TIRE REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-PAINT/BRUSHES/BATTERIES/SMOKE DETECTORS/
PENS-FIRE DEPT
-COMPRESSOR REPAIRS-PARKS DEPT& COMMUNITY
CENTER
PRINTING-FIRE DEPT & HISTORICAL CULTURE
-ZAMBONI BLADES SHARPENED/BLADE BOLT KIT/
BAND-COMMUNITY CENTER
THROTTLE CONTROL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT
-OFFICE SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER & SENIOR
COMMUNITY CENTER
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
SEPTEMER 87 EXPENSES
EXPENSES-STREET MAINTENANCE
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
IMPACT GUN-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-SUPPLIES-IMMUNITY CENTER & HISTORICAL
CULTURAL COMMISSION
EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER
CLEANING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
OCTOBER 87 BUILDING PERMIT SURCHARGE
LAND-EDEN VALLEY PARK
SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDITION
PUMP TANK-SENIOR CENTER
ENGINE REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
NOVEMBER 87 EXPENSES
CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT
-REFUND-DUPLICATE PAYMENT ON SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS
FERTILIZER-PARK MAINTENANCE
VALVE REGULATOR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
5.00
120.96
195.00
37.75
1950.00
212.25
52.28
232.20
1746.14
26.00
61.59
722.00
650.00
22.00
1828.00
24950.00
211.16
12.00
59767.09
60.00
147.05
76.40
116.65
90.95
208.06
63.00
457.16
270.00
324.00
30.00
165.00
9.00
0.00
73.35
99.95
7.34
18.00
23.06
7104.27
1200.00
1021.58
56.00
898.00
165.00
4593.80
267.70
3570.00
50.27
11396701
DECEMBER 1,1987
39107 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-FIRE DEPT 568.78
39108 US FIGURE SKATING ASSOCIATION BADGES-COMMUNITY CENTER 370.25
f - 39109 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC BOLTS/NUTS/WASHERS-PARK MAINTENANCE 64.48
k 39110 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE INC GAS CYLINDERS-COMMUNITY CENTER 134.83
39111 VESSCO INC CHLORINATOR/CHEMICAL FEEDER-WATER DEPT 223.26
39112 VICOM INC SERVICE 225.00
39113 ELVIS VOIGT REFUND-HOUSE MOVING DEPOSIT 385.15
39114 WATERITE INC -SHIELDS/DRAINS/BRACKETS/BCITS/NUTS/PIPE 893.62
REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER
39115 WATER PRODUCTS CO -POLYTUBE/NUT & HOSE SPANNER/CUTTER WHEEL/ 903.04
-BATTERY/PVC PIPE/PIPE LUSE -WATER DEPT/
DRAINAGE CONTROL
39116 SANDRA F WERTS MILEAGE & EXPENSES
39117 WESTERN DESIGN & PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS-FIRE DEPT
39118 WESTERN STATES FOREST PRODUCTS IN TREATED TIMBERS-EDEN VALLEY PARK
39119 WILSON TANNER GRAPHICS PRINTING-HUMAN RESOURCES/COMMUNITY CENTER
39120 ZAHL EQUIPMENT CO WHEEL DRUM-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
39121 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 1ST AID SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
39122 ZIEGLER INC -SNOWPLOW BLADES/FLARES-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
39123 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN 1988 MEMBERSHIP DUES-PLANNING DEPT
39124 ATHERTCN ASSOC REFUND-OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL
39125 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE LICENSE FEE-ASSESSING DEPT
39126 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS INC NOVEMBER 87 INSURANCE CONSULTANT
39127 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPT CONFERENCE-FIRE DEPT
39128 IBM DECEMBER 87 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
39129 RONALD JOHNSON MILEAGE & EXPENSES
39130 KL ZAFFKE INC REFUND-WATER METER DEPOSIT
9131 LAYNE WESTERN CO REFUND-WATER METER DEPOSIT
39132 LMCIT LIABILITY INSURANCE-CITY HALL
39133 PHILIP MATHIOWETZ CONFERENCE-FIRE DEPT
39134 MIDWEST ASPHALT REFUND-WATER METER DEPOSIT
39135 MN REAL ESTATE JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION-PLANNING DEPT
39136 MN STATE FIRE DEPT ASSN 1988 MEMBERSHIP DUES-FIRE DEPT
39137 NCJRS EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
39138 NWTA 1988 MEMBERSHIP DUES-COMMUNITY CENTER
39139 OAK PARK BUSINESS CENTER REFUND-OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL
39140 CURTIS OBERLANDER MILEAGE & EXPENSES
39141 PENNER DEVELOPMENT REFUND-WATER METER DEPOSIT
39142 CATHY PERIA MILEAGE
39143 PLEHAL BLACKIOPPING INC BLACKTOP FOR TENNIS COURTS-EDENBROOK PARK
39144 PRCGRESSIVE CONTRACTING REFUND-WATER METER DEPOSIT
39145 SHADY BUSINESS REFUND-WATER METER DEPOSIT
39146 MARC THIELMAN CONFERENCE-FIRE DEPT
39147 KEITH WALL EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
39148 DANA GIBBS PACKET DELIVERIES
39149 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES
38621 VOID OUT CHECK
38668 VOID OUT CHECK
38669 VOID OUT CHECK
38709 VOID OUT CHECK
38814 VOID OUT CHECK
7620810
41.48 i
55.00 1
125.20
320.00
197.00
70.00
1680.77
336.00
1688.34
15.00
455.00
183.40
742.30
216.16
296.10
600.00
38720.00
125.60
527.23
69.00
165.00
11.00
15.00
699.84
231.98
292.97
7.13
24950.00
344.64
283.68
47.87
14.24
151.00
20.00
9.41-
365.00-
51.25-
234.58-
598.00-
$606382.45
DISTRIBUTIONS BY FUND
10 GENERAL
11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT
15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M
17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE
31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP
33 UTILITY BOND FUND
73 WATER FUND
77 SEWER FUND
81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND
87 CDBG FUND
$606382.45
272011.93
3840.79
29831.80
22392.29
122629.25
2991.28
39143.59
101470.28
3996.60
8074.64
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
( SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
City Manager Carl J. Jul I ie C
Name Change and Uniform Change for Public Safety
Department
October 1, 1987
Over the past year certain management changes have be
e
n
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
P
u
b
l
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
Department which have greatly broadened the base for
d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
-
m
a
k
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
d
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
.
Primarily through a process of participatory manageme
n
t
w
e
h
a
v
e
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
t
h
e
s
t
a
f
f
t
o
express their ideas and recommendations for maintaini
n
g
g
o
o
d
m
o
r
a
l
e
a
n
d
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
w
o
r
k
habits. A process of "quality circle" involvement has
b
e
e
n
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
f
o
r
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
m
o
n
t
h
s
and we are already seeing some significant benefits.
A
c
o
u
p
l
e
o
f
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
c
o
m
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
within the staff of the Police Department relate to th
e
n
a
m
e
a
n
d
u
n
i
f
o
r
m
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
Council discussed at our Budget Review meeting on Sept
e
m
b
e
r
2
2
.
The attached memos of June 26 and July 1 outline the r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
e
b
e
h
i
n
d
o
u
r
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
name and uniform changes. The term "Public Safety Off
i
c
e
r
"
w
h
i
c
h
w
a
s
p
o
p
u
l
a
r
i
n
t
h
e
e
a
r
l
y
70'5 when our department was formed was intended to de
s
c
r
i
b
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
r
s
w
h
o
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
b
o
t
h
police officers and firefighters. This never happened
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
t
h
e
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
expertise and training requirements and time commitmen
t
s
t
o
h
o
l
d
d
o
w
n
b
o
t
h
j
o
b
s
a
t
t
h
e
same time are far too much. Accordingly, over the y
e
a
r
s
t
h
e
F
i
r
e
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
h
a
s
b
e
c
o
m
e
t
h
e
Fire Department with "Firefighters", and the Police
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
c
a
l
l
e
d
t
h
e
P
u
b
l
i
c
Safety Department with "Public Safety Officers". Ou
r
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
t
h
i
s
t
i
m
e
i
s
t
o
make the changes requested by the staff so that both
t
h
e
f
i
r
e
a
n
d
p
o
l
i
c
e
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
c
a
n
have the identities which they have long sought afte
r
a
n
d
,
i
n
e
f
f
e
c
t
,
h
a
v
e
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
d
f
o
r
many years.
In summary, our request is as follows:
1) Change the "Public Safety" designation for the Polic
e
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
to "Police Department". This will be consistent with
t
h
e
long used "Fire Department" designation. The positio
n
"
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
of Public Safety" will be become "Chief of Police".
B
o
t
h
t
h
e
Police Chief and the Fire Chief will report directly
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Manager. A primary benefit of this change will be more direct interchange between the City Manager and the Fire Dep
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
which has become a major City department of its own.
A
l
s
o
,
the Police Chief will be able to spend full-time on
administrating our rapidly expanding and increasingly
c
o
m
p
l
e
x
Police Department.
2) Change the Police uniform shirts to those which will b
e
m
o
r
e
available, less costly, and consistent with those wor
n
b
y
3
0
other departments in the metro area. Some changes to
t
h
e
u
n
i
f
o
r
m
appurtenances are also needed. The extra one-time cos
t
t
o
t
h
e
City for this change-over would be $9,000, which inc
l
u
d
e
s
$3,200 for modification to the badges. The Officers wo
u
l
d
p
a
y
one-half of the cost of the shirt changes from thei
r
u
n
i
f
o
r
m
allowance.
It is recommended that the Council consider approval o
f
t
h
e
s
e
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
s
u
c
h
t
h
a
t
le uniform change-over can occur by January 1, 1988 w
h
e
n
t
h
r
e
e
n
e
w
p
o
l
i
c
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
r
s
w
i
l
l
,e added. Perhaps the Council may find time to discuss t
h
i
s
i
t
e
m
a
t
o
u
r
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
n
e
x
t
Tuesday evening, otherwise we will schedule same for
s
o
m
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
a
t
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
'
s
pleasure.
CJJ:jdp
Attachment
June 26, 1987
TO: CAPTAIN CLARK
FROM: SERGEANT BOSACRER
SUBJECT: UNIFORM CHANGE PROPOSAL FOR 1988 BUDGET
1. At the request of several officers on the department, I began looking
at the possibility of changing the uniform shirts currently in use by
our department. Officers voiced a preference in changing from light
blue to dark blue.
As a result of this, a poll was conducted of all sworn personnel. The
results showed that out of 30 officers, 27 were in favor of switching
to dark blue versus 3 who were against. A committee was formed,
charged with looking at this plus any other changes in our present uni-
form. Rationale for changing at this time is as follows:
A. Availability - historically our officers have had an extremely hard
time in obtaining shirts. The particular design of our current
shirt (light blue with dark pocket flaps and epilets) requires that
they be specially made. We are the only police officers in this
area currently using these shirts and thus the uniform supplier
does not stock a regular supply. This problem also limits the
officers' choices as to where shirts can be purchased.
The dark blue shirt, on the other hand, is very available through
local suppliers. This type of shirt is currently used by 30 police
departments in the metropolitan area out of 37 polled; a very large
majority.
B. Recognition - with the large number of police departments in our
area and in the country who wear the dark shirt, the general public
has come to recognize this as a police uniform. We have people
moving into our community daily from all parts of the country.
These people may not have ever beard of the term "Public Safety
Officer", but do recognize the dark blue uniform as that of a
police officer. Officers of our department have, in the past, been
mistaken for security guards especially at the Eden Prairie Center.
C. Cost - the cost to change over from light blue to dark blue would
be $31.95 each for long sleeved shirts and $28.95 each for short
sleeved shirts. To issue each sworn patrol officer six of each
(long and short sleeved), twelve total, would cost $7 ,673.40. To
issue each police administrator and investigator three of each, six
total, would cost $1,827.00. Total cost for both groups would be
$9,500.40. In 1987, three new officers were added to the depart-
ment all receiving an initial issue of two-tone shirts. By making
a switch to dark blue shirts tentatively between 1/1/88 and 2/1/88,
there would not be any additional monies wasted in re-issuing to
new officers starting next year, which I understand could be as
high as seven new officers. As the department grows, which has
been the trend, it cannot help but become more expensive to switch
over if we wait. 3 19-)
-2-
2. While looking at our present uniform, an interest has also been voiced
in the possibility of making an addition to the shoulder patch.
Nowhere on our patch, or uniform for that matter, will you find the
word "Police". Again, with the rapid influx of new residents, we run
into the recognition problem with the term "Public Safety Officer". A
change could be accomplished without a major redesign of the patch.
This would prevent confusion on the part of long time residents who
recognize the current patch. Included is a sample of three possible
designs which for the most part just include the addition of the word
"Police". In checking with our uniform supplier, Uniforms Unlimited, I
found that the cost would be no more than what we currently pay per
patch, $2.10 each. We would, however, need to order approximately 1000
patches to have enough for new and old uniforms at a cost of $2,100.00.
3. Other changes relating to the uniform as proposed by the committee
include; changing the tie currently used by female officers in winter
uniform to the same tie used by male officers. Rationale for this is
based on uniformity, officer preference (two female officers for
switch, one for current tie) and appearance (or disappearance) of
current tie on a dark blue shirt.
We believe that change is somewhat inevitable in everything. Our present
uniform haa been in existence since the department was formed with no
change. Our community, however, and law enforcement has been changing.
The term "Police" is no longer the dirty word it once was coming out of the
1960's. A community wants to feel secure and a strong law enforcement pre-
sence can instill this. For this reason and the other more practical ones
cited earlier, we should make the proposed changes.
COSTS
12 shirts for each patrol officer
6 shirts for each investigator/administrator
TOTAL
1,000 patches @ $2.10/each
64 AsJCe OVER.
TOTAL COST FOR 6WtTCN
$ 7,673.40
1,827.00
$ 9,500.40
$ 2,100.00
$11,600.40
Recommend 1/2 the total cost, with officers purchasing additional shirts
from uniform allowance.
July 1, 1987
TO: CARL JULLIE
FROM: KEITH WALL
SUBJECT: NAME CHANGE FROM PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT TO
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Your authorization is requested to aeministratively change the "Public Safety"
designation for the police division to "Police Department". This request is
for a name change only and would be consistent with the long-used "Fire
Department" designation.
This change would not affect administration, operations or responsibilities of
either the police or fire divisions which would continue to jointly provide
Public Safety services. However, the proposed name change would remedy
several ongoing concerns:
(1) Confusion to citizens, especially visitors and new residents.
Some are uncertain as to the meaning of Public Safety Officer
and have thought they were dealing with a city inspector, fire
fighter or city informational officer.
(2) Confusion for other Public Safety agencies in our area as the term
Public Safety Officer generally infers an employee with dual police
and fire training and responsibility.
(3) Identity concerns within our police and fire divisions as our
police officers and fire fighters would prefer to be so iden-
tified to their peers from other agencies.
The proposed change would enable both divisions to enjoy identities that they
have long sought and our sworn personnel can be proudly referred to as police
officers.
This proposed change would not affect in any way our long standing philosophies
on excellence in police service and crime prevention or our public service
attitude.
The Police Department also would continue to provide administrative support to
the Fire Department. I propose that the Director of Public Safety title be
changed to Chief of Police. The Police Chief, under the direction of the City
Manager, would continue to have the ultimate authority over all Public Safety
issues.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
City Manager Carl J. Jullie C.
SUBJECT:
City Manager's Salary Adjustment
DATE:
November 25, 1987
The following supportive data regrding my salary review is herei
n
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
for the Council's review and consideration. My last salary adju
s
t
m
e
n
t
w
a
s
$62,500 on January 1, 1987.
City Manager salary information taken from the 1987 Twin Cities
M
e
t
r
o
A
r
e
a
Salary Survey by DCA Stanton Group:
Bloomington $74,500
Brooklyn Park 71,400
Maple Grove 58,300
Plymouth 72,800
Minnetonka 74,675
Burnsville 57,000
Eagan 61,300
Edina 72,500
Richfield 63,000
Hopkins 48,400
St. Louis Park 70,000
Golden Valley 69,000
Coon Rapids 65,400
Fridley 61,500
Maplewood 60,600
Roseville 68,640
Crystal 70,700
Robbinsdale 65,300
New Hope 55,300
1987 Mean
65,280
1988 Mean (est. +4.0%)
67,890
The estimated 1988 Mean salary of $67,890 is very close to the m
i
d
p
o
i
n
t
($68,058) of the salary range ($54,850 - $81,266) for the City M
a
n
a
g
e
r
position as recommended by Arthur Young Assoc. for the City of E
d
e
n
Prairie.
Salary Proposal
Based upon the foregoing comparison with other metro area cities,
t
h
e
Arthur Young recommndations, and the recently completed performa
n
c
e
r
e
v
i
e
w
,
I respectfully request that the City Council consider step salar
y
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
s
as follows: a 5.0% increase effective January 1, 1988, plus a 3
.
6
%
increase effective July 1, 1988. This will bring my salary to t
h
e
$
6
8
,
0
0
0
midpoint by next July.
Thank you very much for your consideration and attention to this
m
a
t
t
e
r
,
and please advise if additional information is needed.
CJJ:jdp
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
(
City Manager Carl J. Jullie
Per Diem for Councilmembers
November 25, 1987
MEMORANDUM
Section 2.05 of the City Code states that in addition to their regular
salaries, "...the Mayor and each Councilmember shall be paid a reasonable
sum for each day plus the reasonable expense incurred while traveling
outside the City on business of the City." In response to this, the
Council may wish to consider approving the following policy with respect to
such per diem payments for attendance at City-business related meetings
outside the City:
$25 each for meetings covering 2 - 4 hours;
$50 each for meetings over 4 hours; or
$50/day maximum.
Councilmembers would submit their claim to the City Manager for inclusion
on the following regular claims list.
CJJ:jdp
ontewilrdth Is ... .4.n.°
941.1 erAtfivss
November 29, 1987
Mr. Steve Keefe
Metropolitan Council Chair
Metropolitan Council
300 Metro Square Building
St. Paul, MN 55101
Re: ERC decision to recommend the expansion of Flying Cloud
Landfill
Dear Mr. Keefe:
In discussing the November 18 Environmental Resource Committee
meeting with neighbors, we felt that the interests of the
citizens of Eden Prairie were not given much consideration.
We also feared that perhaps the outcome of the meeting was
predetermined. It astonished us to see there was virtually no
discussion of some critical matters we brought up.
Mr. Keefe, we are very worried about the public remark you
made in the Pioneer Press, October 21, 1987; "I am delighted
to tell you, we now believe we have enough landfill capacity
to last well into the next century." When I spoke with you on
the phone regarding this, you did confirm that this statement
assumed you would get the expansion. How can you assume the
outcome of a situation before it occurs? It seems to me a
good committee decision is made only after carefully weighing
all the facts and discussing them. It appeared very obvious
to us that you came in with your decision already made and
sought to impose it on the others. Also, we were shocked to
witness the committee's willful disregard for their own Solid
Waste Policy Plan.
Since this recommendation will come before the full Met
Council December 4, the City of Eden Prairie and the citizen's
association will submit position papers. We ask you to recon-
sider your position and evaluate this information.
Recommending an expansion of 5,400 acre feet for 30 years on
top of, and adjacent to a badly contaminated landfill of 17
'years and 6,400 are feet'is utterly shortsighted. :Idn't it
Mr. Steve Keefe -2- November 29, 1987
time we look for a long term solution to the garbage problem?
The City of Eden Prairie and it's citizens are prepared to
fight this expansion all the way. I strongly urge you to seek
alternatives for Hennepin county's garbage.
Sincerely,
Susan Varlamoff
Chair - Environmental
Committee of the Homeward
Hills Homeowners Assoc.
SV:dsd
cc: Rudy Perpich - Governor
Hubert H. Humphrey, III - Attorney General
Randy Johnson, Hennepin County Commissioner
Don Storm, State. Representative
Sidney Pauly, State Representative
The Metropolitan Council Members
The City of Eden Prairie
Rick Rosow - City Attorney
Grant Merritt, Merritt & Associates
INOW11
November 29, 1987
Metropolitan Council Members
300 Metro Square Building
St. Paul, MN 55101
Re: Homeward Hills Homeowners Association position on the Flying
Cloud Landfill Expansion
Dear Council Members:
The permit request for the Flying Cloud Landfill will come before
you for a vote December 4. We, The Environmental Committee of
the Homeward Hills Homeowners Association, have outlined several
important concerns we ask you to seriously consider when making
your decision.
1. The landfill is polluting the groundwater and Minnesota
River. The contamination is as bad as a hazardous waste
dump. It is on the superfund for clean-up. The leachate
plume is approximately 150 feet from an occupied home.
(See attached sheet - The Scientists tell me...)
2. The clean-up system proposed is in serious question. We,
the neighbors, are concerned that toxins are being trans-
ferred from the water to the air that we breathe.
3. Browning FPrris Industries (BFI) owners of the landfill ) has broker :rust of the community.
a. They promised they would close in 1982 in their original
application. (See attached sileet #1.) As a result of
this promise, homes were built adjacent to the landfill.
There are approximately 700 within 1/2 mile of it.
b. We have evidence that there was much illegal dumping
including 55 gallon drums of chemicals. (See attached
letter.) We cannot believe this will change for the
future.
c. Giving BFI an 85% monopoly with this expansion would
result in higher prices. They have a history of price
fixing, contract rigging, etc. (See attached sheet -
Action Bulletin.)
Metropolitan Council Members -2- November 29, 1987
4. Noise, litter and bad odors are a constant problem. There
have been four recorded fires, one explosion, and at least
one reported accident due to flying litter. The Williams
pipeline runs next to the landfill and between the homes.
We fear methane gas could migrate along the pipes to the
homes.
Expanding a badly contaminated landfill in a highly populated
area is not the answer to the solid waste disposal problem. It
is in clear violation of your Solid Waste Policy Plan.
Therefore, for all the above reasons, we urge you to deny the
expansion of the Flying Cloud Landfill December 4. We ask you to
protect our citizens and environment.
The Environmental Committee
of The Homeward Hills Home-
owners Association of Eden
Prairie
Enclosure: Excerpts from original application letter
Research Report
Action Bulletin on BFI
cc: Rudy Perpich - Governor
Hubert H. Humphrey Ill - Attorney General
Randy Johnson - Hennepin County Commissioner
Don Storm, State Representative
Sidney Pauly, State Representative
The City of Eden Prairie
Grant Merritt, Merrit & Associates
Resew:6 Report for release October 23, 1983, or later. Column 486.
The Scientists Tell Me. . .
Some Municipal Waste Landfills
Rival Industrial Ones In Toxicity
Robert L. Haney
TARS Science Writer
The leachate (liquid runoff) from
some municipal and rural waste land-
fills may cause as great a cancer risk
as those from industrial waste land-
fills, warns Dr. Kirk W. Brown, soil
physicist with the Texas Agricultural
Experiment Station.
"While much of the present con-
cern about ground &titer pollution
resulting from nA, &sae disposal is
focused on the leachates emanating
from superfund sites and hazardous
waste landfills." Brown says, "little
attention has been paid to the occur-
rence and concentrations of harmful
chemicals found in the Ieachate from
municipal solid waste landfills.
"In part, this is because federal
regulations limited the definition of
hazardous waste to those from indus-
trial sources. These regulations imp-
ly, by default, that municipal solid
wastes are not hazardous and that their
disposal does not require stringent
regulations.
"If this is not true, the regulations
may be responsible for giving the
American public the erroneous impres-
sion that the leachates leaking from
municipal waste do not pose a threat
to human health or the environment.
"Although restrictions havt great-
ly increased irl recent years on the
landfilling of hazardous industrial
wastes, most municipal wastes are
still disposed of in soil-lined pits that
can readily leak leachate," says
Brown, who has made a number of
studies of problems associated with
disposal of toxic wastes.
In a current study. Brown and K.C. ten that permits catching and contain-
Donnelly compiled chemical constit- mem of leachate.
uents and concentration data and. Long-range, we're going to have to
also, compared the risk which would move toward a system of reclamation
be associated with exposure to the and incineration that will keep polls-
organic pollutants found in leachate tants out of our air, soil, and drinking
from industrial and municipal waste "incr.
landfills. Brown lauds a recent move by the
Toxic and cancer-causing Memi- State of New York that is closing
cals were found in the leachates from hundreds of rural landfills. They are
all 58 landfills for which data were being replaced by high-efficiency
available, irrespective of the type of incinerators in industrial parks that
waste which they received, utilize the energy, thus replacing
Although different groups of pollu- power plants that caused greater air
Santa are found in the different types of pollution.
landfills, the concentrations and lox- "We need to recognize," Brown
icily are such that the leachate from says. "that our municipal waste Win-
some municipal waste landfills may bines many, if not all, of the products
cause as great a cancer risk as those of our modern industrial society.
from industrial waste landfills. Many of these are toxic while others
The risk calculations indicate that degrade in the landfill, releasing toxic
the leachates from several municipal chemicals which often find their way
waste landfills, for which there is into the ground water."
sufficient data, have a carcinogenic Concerned individuals and admin.
(cancer causing) risk that is similar to istrators can obtain further informs-
the risk associated with the leachate tion on minimizing leachate from
from the Love Canal landfill. landfills that have been closed, as well
Brown's concemisMat the grow- as those now in use, plus proper
ing risk to increased contamination of above-ground construction of future
our ground water is heirs largely landfills, and other disposal options.
ignored by federal, state and local Write Dr. Kirk W. Brown, Soil and
.,vemments. Crop Science Department, Texas
'Yet, there are thousands of these A&M University, College Station,
poisonous sites in existence and their Texas. 77843.
number grows daily. We are rapidly
poisoning our ground water with our
municipal waste and most people
seem unaware of it. Editor's Note: Any question regard.
What can be done? Brown advo- mg this column should be addressed
cafes a rapid shutdown of uncon- to Science Writer, Deparmtent of Agri.
trolled. below-ground landfills. For cultural Communications, Texas
the short-term, he recommends an A&M University, College Station,
improved above-pound storage sys- Texas 77843.
The Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. Nevilk P. Clarke. Dinmor. The lexas ASIM University System, College Mallon. Texas
n•nn•
EDER PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
WASIE MANAGEMENT, INC.
Proposed Sanitary Landfill
Greeley and Hansen, Engineers
February, 1970
2.
3. Type, quantity and Source of Refuse
The materials to be disposed of in the proposed
sanitary landfill include domestic, commercial and
industrial solid wastes normally collected by municipal
solid waste collection systems and such materials as
street sweepings, brush and tree debris and demolition
wastes. Liquids, sewage sludge, toxic and hazardous
wastes will not be accepted.
It is estimated that the initial rate of disposal
will be about 800 tons per day.
4. Size and Capacity of Site
The total area encompassed by the site is approxi-
mately 225 acres. The kettle has an area of about 90 acres,
and a maximum depth of about 90 feet. The estimated
volume of the area below the general elevation of the
adjacent ground surface is 5,000,000 cubic yards
(3100 acre-feet). Based on depositing an average of
4,000 cubic yards per day, with a compaction ratio of
2-1/2 to 1,_tha_total life of the site is estimated to
be abo4(12 years.))This estimate includes an allowance
for 6 inch7a7pif cover material dailz and a final cover
of 2 feet. It is based on operation for 5 days per
week.
. 3 :FA
.F . 74, fe-
S
4 . 14,-t
t(2.4.
/7.1.4 tA...-Le 3 (i.2.c.-t iOtAe.54.4- 0'6
2.4.,e-trLar, L2 -.4C kcx4.9 C>L.r ,}.1.4 L Lk tAr _
,
6-e rs ;eizo.„A- -4,-0L,te.i1 71 La? -c1/4;z2z -,
56 cfi- pe-4,Z.,;4S a
n(Q--
&L.0.16.1 4—ez_
cg.SL.1.6 -L9-z 12-e4L-„
• L54.$) 63,.4_12s_ ce-t-)-f ac.t-
t2 9sL
_
.6- -0€ 0-41 At
at. ct
n..c.)e-2' a_ ot LU
At:4 C.-LL.i] tr-Q iteLe.9-
Luc c cc.) I t '14nY4
. L),„ L%-e. cz..94 .
-ESL -k Lv-er...aL L.
Cet
_.12.z:e),L,C.a. LSca
-71116-.? j. 0-9-4-0 ,44t.--.J2..Q- . )Sc "LS
ec,, 132,"„ 6;22 cl_•4_,CZ A:A.Q
04-cce,6 -04,4 --L2Q
,c3A- 4L), ,—Les4 °Lkdk
1SQ It"0-c3-A- -kraL0.(4.. CLAk..;.•\
ck; c-v—RecL "-4-‘,4.(_, 1,72-4Arie
C5--1/4-{1-4j4
S c_14,.:Ju
p o x (
C1
(703) 278-7070 August, 1987
WMI, BFI in BIG Legal Trouble
US's MI and #2 dumpers are in an unpreceden-
ted amount of legal trouble. In the last issue, we
rerorted how #1 Waste Management, Inc. (WMI) top
execs, including head Dean Buntrock, caught "in-
sider trading"in aborted hostile takeover of
Cher:dawn. In depositions, execs admitted they
bought Chemlawn stock before Wea's intentions were
made public, profiting from inside information.
Besides questionable ethics, "insider trading" is
the kind of offense that's pit Well Street
hotshots like Ivan Boesky in jail. We also repor -
ted serious problems WME and rival $2 Browning -
Ferris Industries (BFI) have getting pollution
insurance. We thought these disclosures by CCHW
were pretty hot stuff and hard to top. We were
wrong, as these were only the beginning!
• April 7: BFI head John Drury was spotted by
investment brokers dumping $1.5 million in BFI
shares, a sign a company's in trouble. Sure
enough, as events described below became public,
BF1 stock nose-dived. Using his inside info,
p,o,y uairel himself more than $165,000 in losses.
• April 28: Justice Dept. announced action on
a complaint by EPA and the State of Louisiana.
tiling ,barges against BFI for massive violations
(2800) at its Livingston toxic dump from 1980-7.
Charges included serious safety violations and the
Just ice rov_ wants fines of $25,000 per violation
pUT day, which oonld break WWIDE's previous record
of $15 million.
• teDRE SERIOUS are charges being investigat-
ed by a federal grand jury filed OH Atty. General
Anthony Celebreeze. He charges BFI and vell
executives net in a Monroe, MI motel in 1981 and
conspired together to carve up Toledo area trash
business. If proven, these charges point to the
scary prospect of a near total monopoly.
• In April, a federal jury in Vermont ordered
BFI to pay $6 million in punitive damages and
$51,000 in compensation to Kelso Disposal of
Burlington for predatory pricing and attempted
nonopolization. Keloo charged BFI priced its
disposal service at below cost to undercut Kelso
and the court agreed.
• June 4:. Justice Dept. admitted 11 separate
federal grand juries in 8 states were probing more
conspiracy charges against ma, BFI (contract rig-
ging, price fixing, etc.). Probes are under way in
Birmingham, AL; Orlando and Fort Lauderdale; Mere
phis; Harrisburg and Pittsburgh, PA; Trenton, NJ;
Phoenix, Cleveland and Los Angeles and an unnamed
llth city. The SAN JOSE MERCURY quotes an inside
Justice Dept. source saying grand juries in
Trenton and Fort Lauderdale have made indictments.
WALL STREET JOIRNAL (WSJ„ 6/4/87) reported
WHI was targeted in at least 6 states and BFI in
at least 5. If nothing else, these probes suggest
some interesting answers to questions About these
companies' secret of success in garnering such a
large share of the US's waste disposal business.
• On June 9, the LA County District Attorney
filed criminal antitrust conspiracy Charges versus
Weil, Western Waste Industries and Angelus Hudson,
Inc. If ammicted, companies could be fined $1
million each and be barred from California.
• Both WHI and BrI had these kinds of problems
in the past. WSJ noted 1984 Georgia price fixing
convictions against both comeanies. In 1986, two
execs of WMI's So. Florida subsidiary were convic-
ted of antitrust violations. Federal prosecutors
called the FL scheme "financially devastating,"
costing FL ccesumers millions of dollars annually.
TACTICAL ADVICE: Hundreds of you reading this
newsletter are battling these two oompanies. What
should you do with this information? We suggest
the most fruitful, immediate use you should make
of this information is to DEMAND A FREEZE on all
license and permit applicatione-by either of these
companies for new facilities, existing facilities
and especially for ownership transfers. It seems
like pretty bad public policy to take any
application from these companies seriously while
such serious charges are pending. Further, you
could demand similar Law enforcement probes in
your area, especially if you've seen a number of
takeovers of local waste operatic= by either WHM
or BFI lately, as have residents in most
Midwestern states (by ma) and in the Northeast
(by BFI).
• ONDINPENCE • YOL. iS NO. 4
WASTE HANDLERS IN
HOT WATER
Perhaps because they trace Meanwhile, BFI and its
their corporate lineage to corporate twin, Waste
the organized crime- Management Inc., the big-
dominated trash hauling gest waste handling corn-
business, the now *respect- pany in the US., are now
able waste-handling giants, the subject 01 11 state grand
Brown Ferris Industries jury investigations for a
(BF!) and Waste Manage- variety of antitrust criminal
ment Inc., seem unable to acts including price-fixing
shed old habits. BFI faces and bid-rigging. The Los
legal action from the Justice Angeles County district at-
Department and the State of torney charged the compa-
Louisiana for serious and nies with illegally operating
repeated violations of a cartel, dividing up custom-
federal laws pertaining to era between themselves,
the company's hazardous eliminating true competition
waste site in Louisiana. and creating artificially high
Over a six-year period, in- prices. If convicted, the
spectors uncovered more Amsal3Waig—.
than 2,800 violations, do business in California and
The state and the Depart- WiRigirala0i—lece.
ment of Justice are seeking
$25,000 per day per viola-
tion, or $2.2 billion from
BF! for such activities as
improper disposal of liquid
and flammable wastes, fail-
ure to maintain an up-to-
date emergency plan, failure
to provide emergency re-
sponse teams and failure to
properly maintain surface
toxic waste impoundments.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
City Manager Carl J. Jullie C
Possible Refurbishment of Fl Engine No. 1
December 1, 1987
Fire Engine No. 1 recently sustained upwards of $10,000 damage from an
accident that occurred at Highway 5 and Mitchell Road. Discussions with
the manufacturer have yielded opportunities to improve the fire fleet. To
do so would require use of the statutory competitive bid process.
The memorandum from the Fire Chief details the possibilities for repair and
refurbishment of pumpers. What is proposed is a trade-in of Engine No. 4,
an older piece of equipment, and the use of $20,000 budgeted for the
refurbishment of that engine to be applied to the $50,000 estimated cost to
refurbish Engine No. 1 (built in 1974).
Consideration of refurbishing Engine No. 1 is timely in light of the
repairs now necessary. Refurbishment of Engine No. 1 had been contemplated
for 1989. Replacement parts to make the engine serviceable would be
removed and unusable when the engine is refurbished later.
Repair to the engine would be delayed until the award of bids, which should
happen on January 5. Money for the repairs would come from the City's
deductible portion of its insurance coverage (i.e., out of the General Fund
Reserve).
Staff believes that the firefighting fleet will still be adequate if Engine
No. 4 were removed from service.
Recommendation: It is recommended that Council authorize the preparation
of specifications and advertisement for bids for the refurbishment of
Engine No. 1 with the trade-in of Engine No. 4.
CJJ:jdp
Enc.
0
November 30, 1987
cc: Keith Wall TO: Carl Jullie
FROM: Ron Johnson o"
SUBJECT: Refurbishment and Repair of Pumpers
In 1987 the Fire Department was budgeted $20,000.00 to
refurbish Engine *4. Our intent was to do a minimal
refurbishment to the Engine and also convert it to a
hazardous materials vehicle. This conversion would in no
way hinder its structural fire response capability.
We contacted Custom Fire in order to get an estimation of
what could be done to the truck with the $20,000.00
budgeted. Two days prior to our meeting, Engine #1 was
involved in a traffic accident resulting in approximately
$10,000.00 in damage.
While meeting with Custom Fire to gather information;
another option was brought forward. This new option is to
refurbish Engine *1 while it is in the shop for repair of
damages. This option would mean that we would get Engine *1
back refurbished to basically the same vehicle that is being
purchased from the bond referendum. This means that it
would be converted to a four door Ford body style. This
body style means that all Firefighters would ride in an
enclosed cab facing forward. After the recent accident, I
think this is a very important safety feature.
As part of this option, Custom Fire offered to take Engine
*4 in trade. They have offered us approximately $30,000.00
for it.
We had talked about refurbishing Engine #1 in late 1988 or
early 1989.
I have attached the proposal letter from Custom Fire
describing two options:
I. Refurbish Engine *4.
2. Refurbish Engine *1, using Engine *4 as a trade-in.
I strongly feel that the second option is a better
investment, because Engine *4 is now 18 years old. 0
I also feel that with the new engines on order we will have
sufficient pumping capacity for our City. Even with the
loss of Engine #4, we will still have two engines per
Station, for a total of six.
Any effect this would have on I.S.O. would be minimal, as it
would only involve a reserve engine.
If Engine *1 were refurbished, it could be built to serve as
our hazardous materials vehicle.
I must ask for immediate consideration of this proposal, as
we are currently down an engine. I would recommend that
this proposal only be approved with the provision that
Engine #4 would not be turned over until the first of the
new engines ordered arrives.
Please also advise whether or not a bidding process must be
used, and if so how we can expedite it.