HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 11/17/1987TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 1987
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
. 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia
Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to
the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director
John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris
Enger, Director of Community Services
Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works
Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary
Sue Anderson
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
A. Special City Council/Planning Commission meeting held Tuesday,
October 20 1987
B. Regular City Council meeting held Tuesday, October 22, 1987
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Resolution Authorizing Sale of Property to State of Minnesota for
State Highway No. 5 Right-of-Way (Resolution No. 87-310)
B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 55-87, amending Chapter 2 of
the City Code riTifirit the posting of a schedule of the regular
meetings of the Council and special and emergency meetings
C. Final Plat Approval for Shady Oak Ridge (located west of Old Shady
DiribiTind north orkowland ATad) Resolution No. 87-301 --
D. Final Plat Approval for Berne Addition (located on Franklin Circle
north rVaiiey View Roaar -Kesolution No. 87-304
E. Approval of License Agreement with Chicago and Northwestern
Transportation Company for construction and maintenance of a 24-
inch watermain crossing railroad property on Valley View Roid ---
F. Receive petition for street and utility improvements for Franlo
Road south of Prairie Center Drive and authorize preparation of a
feasibility study, I.C. 52-13I -TRisolution No. 87-305)
G. Authorize Mayor and City Manager to execute easements for the
Metropolitan Waste Control CommisTioii -T6FThi-TiairTaTiOn -7
the proposed Red Rock Interceptor through City-owned properties
Page 2882
Page 2888
Page 2900
Page 2792
Page 2901
Page 2904
Page 2906
Page 2911
Page 2913
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,November 17, 1987
H. Approval of Community Center Operational Modifications
I. RAVEN RIDGE II by The Cambridge Group. 2nd Reading of Ordinance
No. 50-87, Zoning District Amendment within the RM-6.5 District
for Raven Ridge; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Raven
Ridge II; and Adoption of Resolution No. 87-306, Authorizing
Summary of Ordinance No. 50-87, and Ordering Publication of Said
Summary. 3.04 acres into 16 lots and 2 outlots for construction
of 16 townhouse units. (Ordinance No. 50-87 - Zoning District
Amendment; Resolution No. 87-306 - Authorizing Summary and
Publication)
J. Resolution No. 87-311 extension of Bond Authorization for the
Prairie Village Apartments for 1 year to December 22. 1988
K. Approve Change Order No. 1 for Community Center
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. BLUESTEM HILLS 4TH ADDITION by Brown Land Company. Request for
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 15.94 acres, Planned
Unit Development District Review on 15.94 acres with variances,
Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 10.57 acres with
Shoreland variance to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Zoning
District Amendment within the R1-13.5 District on 5.36 acres, and
Preliminary Plat of 15.94 acres into 27 single family lots, 3
outlots, and road right-of-way. Location: West of Bennett Place
and Bluestem Lane. (Resolution No. 87-250 - PUD Concept;
Ordinance No. 45-87-PUD-11-87 - PUD District and Zoning District
Change; Resolution No. 87-251 - Preliminary Plat) Continued from
September 1 and September 15, 1987
B. STARRWOOD by Cardarelle & Associates. Request for Zoning District
Change from rural to R1-13.5 on 22.4 acres, Preliminary Platting
of 29.19 acres into 42 single family lots, 2 outlots, and road
right-of-way. Location: North of Research Road, east of Mitchell
Road, southeast of McCoy Lake. (Ordinance No. 56-87 - Rezoning to
R1-13.5; Resolution No. 87-307 - Preliminary Plat)
C. BLUFFS EAST 5TH ADDITION by Hustad Development Corporation.
Request for Zoning Distrtict Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 17.68
acres, and Preliminary Plat of 30.1 acres into 34 single family
lots, and road right-of-way. Location: Southeast of Meade Lane
Lane extension, west of Franlo Road, northwest of Antlers Ridge
extension (Ordinance No. 57-87 - Rezoning to R1-13.5; Resolution
No. 87-308 - Preliminary Plat)
D. Proposed Amendment to City Code, Chapter 11, Section 11.03,
Subdivision regarding screening and landscaping (9rdinance
No. 58-87)
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
VII. PETITIONS REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request by Ryan Construction Company on behalf of Jerry's Super
Valu (continued from November 3, 1987)
Page 2914
Page 2939
Page 2947
Page 2953
Page 2957
Page 2958
Page 2969
Page 2985
Page 2992
Page 2846 £
2993
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,November 17, 1987
B. KADA INC. ADDITION by Karp's Twin City Supply Company. Request
for Preliminary Platting of 4.1 acres into I lot. Location:
North of Highway #5, south of Martin Drive, west of Mitchell Road.
(Resolution No. 87-309 - Preliminary Plat)
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
A. Residents Advisory Committee on City Administrative Offices
Final Report
IX. APPOINTMENTS
A. Appointment of member to Southwest Metro Transit Commission
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
I. City Manager's Performance Review
B. Report of City Manager
I. Set Special City Council meeting at 6:00 PM on December I
IM for report on Comparable Worth Way
C. Report of City Attorney
D. Report of Director of Planning
E. Report of Director of Community Services
F. Report of Director of Public Works
XI. NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Page 2994
Page 3000
Page 3023
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 20, 1987
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS:
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF:
6:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris and
Patricia Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant
to the City Manager Craig Dawson, and
Recording Secretary Jan Nelson
Julianne Bye, Christine Dodge, Bob
Halllett, Charles Ruebling, Edward Schuck,
Richard E. Anderson, and Douglas Fell
Director of Planning Chris Enger
ROLL CALL: All City Council Members were present. Commission
Members Schuck and Anderson were absent. Commission
Members Bye, Dodge, Hallett and Ruebling arrived late.
A. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 6:15 PM.
B. ITEMS OF CONCERN FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION
Commission Member Fell said as a structural engineer he has some
concerns about parking structures in the City. He said there are
a variety of designs and some very cheap construction that may
deteriorate rapidly. He said he thought we should find out what
other cities are doing about regulating the construction of such
structures and begin implementing some guidelines.
A discussion followed regarding such regulation by other cities and
by the state, and what problems could develop because of poor
construction.
1. Development of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (i.e. slopes, etc.)
Commission Member Fell said he was concerned about contractors who
build the same house on a sloped lot as on a flat lot. He said
this can cause unbalanced soil pressures and may cause a deck or
other portion of the structure to collapse. He suggested that we
might consider having a structural engineer on the Staff to inspect
such structures.
Bentley said he was not sure what type of liability we would get
ourselves into if such a structure were inspected and passed by
our Building Department and then inherent engineering flaws
occurred.
72-2
City Council/Plan. Comm. Minutes 2 October 20, 1987
Fell said he was also concerned about the effect on existing homes if we were to come out with certification procedures for steep
slope lots.
Harris said these concerns were raised during the discussion of
a
recent project and she thought we do need to be more sensitive
t
o
development in these areas.
Pidcock asked if our inspectors would have the expertise to che
c
k
on this type of construction. City Manager Jullie said the pla
n
s
are reviewed by the plan checkers; however, Mr. Schmieg who is
a
n
engineer has expressed concern about the homes being built on t
h
e
steep slopes.
Pidcock asked if it would be feasible to require an engineering
inspection for construction on lots beyond a certain degree of
slope. Jullie said we have the capability of requiring such
inspections if we feel it is appropriate.
Peterson asked if we have any standards in place. Jullie respon
d
e
d
that we do not and noted that some of the newer projects that wi
l
l
be coming on line are in areas with bluff-type conditions an
d
w
i
l
l
pose potential problems.
2. Relationship of Footprint to Lot Size for Residential Construc
t
i
o
n
Bentley said he thought the previous discussion ties right int
o
this topic and the plans for R1-44 lot sizes. He said the que
s
t
i
o
n
is how do we implement that at this stage of the game. He said
there would have to be extensive study done in advance regardi
n
g
which areas were talking about and if there are enough areas
l
e
f
t
to be impacted.
Harris said it was important for the Commission to understand t
h
a
t
,
as a first step, it does have the support of the Council in ter
m
s
of review of these unique situations and in terms of requiring
developers to reconsider the engineering requirements for this
t
y
p
e
of situation.
Planning Director Enger noted that footprints, steep slopes and
R1-44 are different ways to approach the steep slope problem. H
e
said the recommendation for Bluestem IV was that the developer
should construct the lot so that it is a typical lot for a typic
a
l
home. He said this required the developer to construct a build
i
n
g
pad ahead of time with a structural retaining wall and with a
proper amount of back yard so that any builder could come in a
n
d
build a traditional house. The retaining wall would have been
designed by a soils and structural engineer, constructed by a
contractor/developer, and reviewed and inspected by a structur
a
l
and soils engineer. He said Staff thinks this is a tool that
c
o
u
l
d
work in a number of additional areas.
Enger said Staff is continuing to look at R1-44 and footprint
requirements. He said this might include designing criteria t
o
b
e
placed in the platting or zoning ordinance which would describ
e
a
City Council/Plan. Comm. Minutes 3 October 20, 1987
category. He said all these possibilities might be tied together
to develop some guidelines.
Commission Member Hallett arrived at 6:35 PM.
Peterson said he was not sure about the effectiveness of R1-44
keeping houses away from steep slopes. He asked if we would want
to work with someone who wants to build something dramatic on a
steep-sloped lot or if we would stay away from that sort of thing.
Enger replied he thought this was a difficult situation that would
require a very comprehensive review and would require that a soils
engineer be involved. Enger said he thought the City should try to
review subdivisions to keep those situations to a minimum.
Commission Member Dodge arrived at 6:40 PM.
Peterson asked if Staff and the Commission would appreciate having
predetermined criteria that would automatically trigger into a
certain type of building situation in order to provide a mechanism
to respond to the builder. Enger said they would. Peterson then
asked if Staff is working on such criteria. Enger responded they
have not started yet.
Anderson said he thought the concern was not so much with the
occasional unique structure as with the increase over the past few
years in the size of the house built while the lot size remains the
same. He said this takes up more of the unique space in a project.
He noted that we are allowing these houses to be built and then
turn around to request review by the Board of Appeals because the
house doesn't fit the lot.
Bentley said he thought we should not overlook the possibility of
using the R1-22 designation in some areas as well. He said he
would like to have Staff work to: 1) determine where these areas
exist; and 2) which areas might be best served by R1-44 or R1-22
zoning due to the degree of slope or the nature of the soil. He
suggested that Staff do the bulk of the research work on this,
bring it to the Planning Commission for a thorough review and then
come to the Council with recommendations.
Commission Member Fell said he thought there is a problem with
going to a larger lot; however, it might be possible to work out a
setback requirement from the slope.
Commission Members Ruebling and Julianne Bye arrived at 6:45 PM.
Commission Member Hallett asked if it would be possible to
determine the building pad for this type of lot and then require
that the building stay within that pad. He said this would avoid
variances and would provide a predetermination of where the house
could be built.
Anderson said he understood the concern about putting large homes
on R1-13 lots, thereby losing all the trees and the hills on the
lots when the house and driveway are constructed. He said we need
City Council/Plan. Comm. Minutes 4 October 20, 1987
to determine what we are going to do with the last half of the Ci
t
y
in terms of such things as trees and hills.
Peterson asked if this wasn't another way of trying to enforce a
tree policy. Anderson responded that it would be a way of determining unique areas and then protecting those areas.
Bentley said he thought this might create unbuildable situations i
n
many cases because of the marketing concerns for such high-premium
lots with developers being unable to get such high prices for the
lots and therefore not being willing to develop such areas.
Pidcock said there is a market out there for larger lots, even up
to two acres. She said she saw nothing wrong in creating a new
zoning classification for the higher priced lots if we could create
one for the lower end of the market place.
Hallett said he thought this was just an alternative; however, it
would be possible to make a good sized footprint that most houses
would fit in.
Bentley noted that an ordinance can't be created that is so
restrictive that it constitutes the taking of land. Peterson noted
that it would be important to apply any such restrictions
judiciously.
Planning Director Enger said it would probably evolve along the
lines of describing a vertical profile, so that a three-dimension
a
l
lot would be defined with a certain number of feet setback from the
slope, which would leave you with your buildable area. Be said
this would require careful review of the subdivisions to be sure
there was a large enough building pad and that it did not create
a
variance situation.
Bentley asked what would happen in the situation where there is a
slope that starts within 40 feet of the front lot line. Enger
replied that the point would be to solve the majority of the
problems coming through with subdivisions with the thought that
there will always be specific situations that cannot be resolved
within the guidelines. Enger said there might be additional
criteria that would avoid platting on the steep lots.
Harris noted there are always exceptions and those can always be
dealt with on a case-by-case basis.
Commission Member Fell said he wanted to be sure we provide legal
recourse to the homeowner to go back to the structural engineer.
Enger said they are concerned about the situations where the
structure actually gets slid out past the face of the slope, and
the developer may actually bring in fill for the slope.
Anderson said he agreed wholeheartedly that we should have our
Staff investigate and ident'Lfy the areas of concern.
City Council/Plan. Comm. Minutes 5 October 20, 1987
4. Installation/Hook-up to Sanitary Sewer and Water
Bentley asked what this question pertained to. Hallett responded
that this was in relation to the southwest quadrant and the
planning that goes into the location of multiples, etc. Hallett
said they wanted to have input into how the picture fits together
so they don't just react to developer's requests.
City Manager Jullie noted this is one of the issues to be covered
during strategic planning. Anderson said he wanted the Commission
to know that we are starting that process.
C. DISCUSSION OF ROLES OF PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL IN THE CURRENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS
Commission Member Fell said he was concerned about the recent situation
where the Planning Commission went through a lot of discussion and their
decision was then overturned. He said they could have gone further
into some of the items in the project but they didn't feel it was
appropriate after they voted to deny the project. He said he would like
to see some other process to return an item to the Commission for
further review in other areas rather than just reversing the
Commission's decision.
Commission Member Bye said they had worked out a system with Staff to
limit the length of the meetings which precludes lengthy discussions
on any one item, particularly if the project is denied. She said she
thought the crucial issues for the next few years are the in-fill areas
and the question will be whether the project fits and whether it is
consistent.
Peterson asked if the Commission has discussed and arrived at a
consensus as to what the recommendation would be if the Council
overturns a project that the Commission recommended for denial.
Commission Member Ruebling said they had not discussed a recommendation
but the important concept was that there be some sort of review
situation in order to sure that the appropriate recommendations
have been covered for those cases where the Commission has recommended
denial by whatever vote and the Council recommends approval. He said they need to have a review process to cover all the important
recommendations before the developer starts theproject.
Bentley asked Enger if it would be appropriate to return to the Planning
Commission between First and Second Readings for their review. Enger
said it would.
Commission Member Dodge said that in the particular project involved,
the Commission didn't discuss the height of the fence between the
residents lots. Bentley noted that the Council did discuss that at
their meeting.
Enger noted that on some of the controversial land use issues, most of
the time can be spent on whether the land use is correct or not, thereby
City Council/Plan. Comm. Minutes 6 October 20, 1987
not really addressing all of the other issues involved in the
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
He said after the land use is resolved the Staff is very ineffe
c
t
i
v
e
with the developer in extracting special details.
Peterson said he thought the review between First and Second Re
a
d
i
n
g
s
was a good idea but wasn't sure how it will work practically, a
s
s
o
m
e
o
f
the people may refuse to consider any changes.
Hallett said he didn't think there was anything to lose by foll
o
w
i
n
g
such a procedure.
Bye noted that if the process works, it will help to clean up t
h
e
projects.
A discussion followed as to the procedure that would be used
t
o
f
l
a
g
such items through the process.
D. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 725 PM.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 20, 1987
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and
Patricia Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant
to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director
John D. Frane, Director of Planning
Chris Enger, Director of Community
Services Robert Lambert, Director of
Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and
Recording Secretary Jan Nelson
ROLL CALL: All members were present.
PRESENTATION OF AWARD OF MERIT FROM MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE
Stu Fox introduced Ray Boltman, past president of the Minnesota Society
of Arboriculture, who presented an Award of Merit to the City of Eden
Prairie for a single major contribution in the fields of arboriculture
or forestry. He said the award was in recognition of the land alteration
ordinance adopted by the City in 1982 and a tree replacement policy
adopted in 1986.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following items were added to the Agenda: III. M. FOUNTAIN
PLACE, by CSM Corporation; X. B. 1. Power Line Along Highway 5:
X. B. 2. City Manager Performance Review Process.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Agenda and
Other Items of Business, as published and amended. Motion carried
unanimously.
II. MINUTES
A. Minutes of City Council meeting held Tuesday, September 8, 1987
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the
Minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, September 8,
1987, as published. Motion carried unanimously.
2
City Council Minutes 2 October 20, 1987
B. Minutes of City Council meeting held Tuesday, September 15, 1987
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the
Minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, September 15,
1987, as published. Motion carried unanimously.
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Award bid for Community Center Repair
C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 52-87 regulating the sale of strong
beer
D. Request from Ray Stodola to sell land adjacent to Eden Valley
Park
E. Resolution No. 87-286 approving State Bonded Fund Grant for
Acquisition and Development of Riley Lake Park Expansion
F. Final Plat approval for Cardinal Hills (east of Baker Road,
west of Highway No. 494) Resolution No. 87-289
G. Final Plat approval for Shady Oak Crosstown Addition (Amoco
Station south of the Crosstown, east of Shady Oak Road)
Resolution No. 87-290
H. Change Order No. 1, Watermain Extension from Baker Road to
Rowland Road, I.C. 52-117
I. Resolution approving the establishment of a Water Maintenance and Repair Fund by the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed
District (Resolution No. 87-287)
J. Resolution requesting participation in maintenance and repairs
in the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District
(Resolution No. 87-288)
K. Grading Permit for Olympic Hills Golf Course
L. Approve Grading permit for portion of Lot 12, Eden Prairie Acres
M. FOUNTAIN PLACE, by CSM Corpooration. 2nd Reading of Ordinance
#40-87-PUD-9-87, Rezoning and Planned Unit Development District
Review from Rural to PUD-9-87-RM-2.5; Approval of Developer's
Agreement for Fountain Place; and Adoption of Resolution #87-281,
Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #40-87-PUD-9-87, and Ordering
Publication of Said Summary. 52 acres into 4 lots, 1 outlot, and
road right-of-way for a 490-unit apartment project. Location:
West of Highway #169, north of Columbine Road. (Ordinance #40-
87-PUD-9-87, Rezoning and PUD District; Resolution #87-281,
Authorizing Summary and Publication)
q
City Council Minutes 3 October 20, 1987
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris, to approve Items A -
M on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. RAVEN RIDGE II by The Cambridge Group. Request for Zoning
District Amendment within the RM-6.5 District on 3.04 acres, and
Preliminary Plat of 3.04 acres into 18 lots and 2 outlots for
construction of 18 townhouse units. Location: East of Edenvale
Boulevard, South of Raven Court. (Ordinance No. 50-87, Rezoning;
Resolution No. 87-282, Preliminary Plat)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published and property owners within the project vicinity had
been notified.
Chuck Benson, representing The Cambridge Group, addressed the
proposal.
Planning Director Enger said this project was reviewed by the
Planning Commission at the September 28th meeting and was
recommended for approval on a 5-0 vote, subject to the plans
dated September 22nd and the recommendations of the Staff
Report of September 25th. He said the major items of concern
were building orientation and spacing between buildings;
however, these concerns had been resolved with the elimination
of two of the proposed units.
Director of Community Services Lambert said the Parks, Recreation
and Natural Resources Commission reviewed this last evening and
voted approval, per the Planning Commission and Staff recom-
mendations.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the Public
Hearing and to give 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 50-87, amending
Ordinance No. 25-78, for terms of rezoning. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve Resolution
No. 87-282 approving the Preliminary Plat of Raven Ridge II for
The Cambridge Group. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to direct Staff to
prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and
Staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously.
B. AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE, by Opus Corporation. Request for
Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 14.36 acres,
Planned Unit Development District Rview on 14.36 acres with
variances; Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 5.34
'?-7`)0
City Council Minutes 4 October 20, 1987
acres, Preliminary Plat of 14.36 acres into 1 lot for con-
struction of a 5-story office building. Location: North of CSAH
#62, south of Yellow Circle Drive. (Resolution No. 87-284,
PUD Concept Amendment to American Family Insurance PUD; Ordinance
No. 51-87-PUD-13-87, Rezoning and PUD; Resolution No. 87-285,
Preliminary Plat)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been
published and property owners within the project vicinity had
been notified.
Bob Worthington, Mike Ryan, David Krueger and Duane DeBower,
representing Opus Corporation and American Family Insurance,
addressed the proposal.
Planning Director Enger said the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this project at the September 28th meeting on a 5-0
vote subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report of
September 25th.
Director of Community Services Lambert said the Parks, Recreation
and Natural Resources Commission reviewed this project last night
and recommended approval per the recommendations of the Planning
Commission and Staff, with the additional recommendation that the
pedestrian trail be extended to this portion of the site.
Peterson asked Enger if this project was one that initiated the
question about standards for parking ramps. Enger said that was
correct and noted that the Planning Commission had previously
discussed standards for reinspection of parking decks several
months ago.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to close the Public
Hearing and to adopt Resolution No. 87-284, approving the
American Family Insurance PUD Concept Amendment to the overall
American Family Insurance Planned Unit Development. Motion
carried unanimously.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to give 1st Reading
of Ordinance No. 51-87-PUD-13-87 for Rezoning, with variances
for building height and setback subject to approval by the
Board of Appeals and Adjustment. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to adopt Resolution
No. 87-285, approving the Preliminary Plat of American Family
Insurance for Opus Corporation. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to direct Staff to
prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and
Staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes 5 October 20, 1987
Bob Worthington requested permission to begin early grading of
the project.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to grant an early
grading permit subject to the condition that if 2nd Reading
does not occur, proponent agrees to restore the premises to the
conditions that existed prior to the grading activity.
Anderson said he wanted to be sure that the City would not
incur any extra expense if early grading is permitted and then
the project falls through. Jullie said he didn't envision any
additional costs for this project.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously.
C. VACATION 87-09, VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ON
LOTS 35, 38, AND 39, BLOCK 1, WYNDHAM KNOLLS (Resolution No.
87-291)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had
been published and property owners within the project vicinity
had been notified. He said this is basically a housekeeping
item.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the
Public Hearing and to adopt Resolution No. 87-291 for Vacation
of Drainage and Utility Easements. Motion carried unanimously.
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 37951 - 38267
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Payment
of Claims Nos. 37951 - 38267. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley,
Harris, Pidcock and Peterson voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 53-87, Requiring Filing of Financial
Statements by Candidates and Committees
Referring to the memo of August 31, 1987 from City Attorney
Pauly with attached draft ordinance, Peterson said we might want
to consider a smaller threshhold for the second suggestion.
A discussion followed regarding the threshhold amount for
reporting names of contributors.
Bentley said we might use the wording "cumulative" in order to
avoid the possibility of multiple small contributions. City
Attorney Pauly asked if it was intended to cover the entire
election period. Bentley said it should.
City Council Minutes 6 October 20, 1987
Bentley asked what the meaning of "verified financial statement"
was. Pauly said it would be one that was sworn to before a
notary. Bentley suggested that explanation be put into the
ordinance as a definition. Pauly said he thought it was covered
in Subd. 2. B.
Bentley noted he understood it would still be required of the
candidate to file a sworn statement even though the candidate's
campaign committee would handle the receipts and disbursements.
Pidcock asked how the question of cash would be addressed.
Pauly said there should be a receipt for cash from the committee
and the cash should be turned over to the committee. Bentley
said it would be deposited in a checking account and could be
accounted for that way.
Peterson asked if the State law is clear about the expenditure
of money for such expenses as having a coffee party for the
candidate. Pauly said it would have to be recorded in the
aggregate but not individually attributed.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to give 1st Reading
of Ordinance No. 53-87, requiring filing of financial statements
by candidates and committees, as amended to set the threshhold
amount at $250.00. Motion carried unanimously.
Pidcock suggested that this ordinance be reviewed every four
years in order to update the amounts if necessary.
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request appeal by Mr. & Mrs. John McSwiggan from decision made
by Board of Appeals & Adjustments on Variance Request #87-37
City Manager Jullie noted the request from Mr. & Mrs. McSwiggan
to review the decision made by the Board of Appeals & Adjustments
on their request for a variance to construct a deck onto
their house at the corner of Divinity Lane and Caramel Trail.
He said the deck would encroach 10 feet into the 30-foot set-
back; therefore the Board denied the McSwiggan's request on
August 13, 1987. He said the Council may affirm the Board's
action or may reverse the decision and grant the variance.
John McSwiggan reviewed the history of the denial of his request
for variance. He said he felt the variance was denied because
there was an alternate deck location available; however, he said
there was no real consideration given to the alternate location.
He said he had made a determined effort to make sure that all
his neighbors approved his deck plans and their letters should be
in the public record. He said he thought the primary rule is
whether it is in the public interest for the neighborhood.
City Council Minutes 7 October 20, 1987
Mr. McSwiggan said his deck poses no safety hazard and said he
felt the Board was very whimsical in its decision.
Peterson said he appreciated Mr. McSwiggan's frustration and
concern: however, the Board and the Council both must follow
the standards and rules that relate to all of the neighborhoods
in Eden Prairie.
Mr. McSwiggan said he is only asking for eight feet out of 30
feet and he felt he should have reasonable use of his land.
Pidcock asked if he was on a corner lot. McSwiggan said he is,
and his total setback is 40 feet including the easement.
Bentley said the proposal for an alternate deck location should
be taken only for the merit it has. He said neither the Council
nor the Board of Appeals has any obligation or any duty to make
an accommodation to allow someone to build a deck. He said he
couldn't determine that there was any hardship in this case.
Bentley asked Planning Director Enger what the history has been
in enforcing the dual front yard setback on corner lots. Enger
said that the front yard setback has been enforced in the vast
majority of such cases. He said the Board of Appeals is trying
to establish a policy that there should be a hardship as in other
variance requests before they would see fit to grant a variance
request for front yard setback. He said the ordinance speaks to
platting corner lots 15 feet wider because of two front yard
setbacks.
Mr. McSwiggan said he thought you would never find a hardship
case for deck construction; however, one of the objectives is to
use the land for what it was meant.
Pidcock asked who would be impacted by this construction.
McSwiggan pointed out the area that would have a view of the deck.
Bentley said the broader perspective of public interest is what
is in the interest of the community as a whole. McSwiggan said
he doesn't agree with the 30-foot setback nor do any of those
he has talked to about the subject.
Bentley said he saw no basis for determining that the Board of
Appeals acted improperly. He said they made a decision to uphold
an ordinance that is in place and that is what they should do.
Peterson said he was not sure we should make a decision based on
one deck as that decision has to follow the next person to come
in for a variance.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to uphold the
decision of the Board of Appeals & Adjustments in denying the
request for variance.
City Council Minutes a October 20, 1987
Bentley asked if Mr. McSwiggan would be able to come back and
make another request if sometime in the future we decide we would
like to change our policy on setback. City Attorney Pauly said
if that future consideration resulted in reducing the setback
sufficiently, then he would not have to request a variance and
could go ahead and build the deck.
Peterson said he would vote for the motion with the expectation
that we would at least look at the rationale for continuing the
30-foot setbacks on corner lots.
Bentley called the question.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously.
B. 1-494 Traffic Study Presentation by BRW, Inc.
Connie Kozlak of the Metropolitan Council and Dick Wolsfeld of
BRW reviewed the recently completed 1-494 traffic study. The
primary cities involved were Eden Prairie, Bloomington, Edina,
Richfield and Minnetonka. Mr. Wolsfeld said one of the major
projects resulting from the study involves traffic management to
minimize the number of vehicles during peak periods. He said the
current system does not come close to accommodating the projected
traffic load.
Mr. Wolsfeld reviewed the other strategies devised to alleviate
the traffic on 1-494. He noted that the cost to add the proposed
lanes to 1-494 is estimated at $500 million. He reviewed the
three phase program proposed to implement the recommendations.
Harris said she thought this was a very exciting report and she
commended them on their proactive approach to prepare the program
for the time when funding becomes available. Bentley added that
he thought everyone involved in this project should be applauded
for their efforts to date.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to accept the
final report on the 1-494 traffic study. Motion carried
unanimously.
C. WINDSONG II, by The Koosman & Rice Company. Request for
Preliminary Plat of 1.43 acres into 4 lots. Location: North-
east of Anderson Lakes Parkway at Chestnut Drive (Resolution
No. 87-283, Preliminary Plat)
Planning Director Enger said this is primarily a housekeeping
item for replatting to allow them to move a building on their
existing site. He said the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this revision.
City Council Minutes 9 October 20, 1987
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to adopt Resolution
No. 87-283 approving the Preliminary Plat of Windsong II for
the Koosman & Rice Company. Motion carried unanimously.
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
There were no reports.
IX. APPOINTMENTS
There were none.
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Proposal for a Comprehensive Waste Management Program
Peterson called attention to his memo of October 15th
regarding a call for a comprehensive waste management
program.
City Manager Jullie said he had invited Mr. Reuter to
be present at the meeting tonight as there had been some
very preliminary thoughts with respect to a composte
facility.
Peterson said he would like to ask Staff to respond on
this and provide some recommendations at the next meeting.
He said we must have a waste management program which we
don't have right now.
Anderson said this was an area that he would prefer to
discuss at a special meeting as he didn't want to take
the time at a regular meeting.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to set a
Special Meeting of the City Council for 6:00 PM on Tuesday
November 3, 1987, to discuss those two issues plus the
composting facility, and to direct Staff to proceed with
evaluation on Items One and Two in Peterson's memo and
report back at the Special Meeting.
Harris said it would be helpful for her if there were some
background material included regarding the compost
facility.
Doug Reuter distributed a paper issued by the staff of the
Metropolitan Council in May of 1987 on the subject of
landfill capacities. He said it would be helpful if the
Councilmembers were to look at this prior to the Special
Meeting. He also noted that Reuter Corporation is not
City Council Minutes 10 October 20, 1987
hung up on doing a compost plant in Eden Prairie; however,
they can offer some expertise in the area. He said it
would be necesaary to propose alternatives that will
accomplish the same capacity levels as those outlined
by BFI for the landfill expansion.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously.
B. Report of City Manager
1. Power Line Along Highway 5
City Manager Jullie said NSP is having to relocate some
of the overhanging wires along the Highway 5 construction.
Because they need some easement rights for the new high
line out to the western edge of the City, we have suggested
that we would trade easement rights for undergrounding of
the wiring between Mitchell Road and Prairie Center Drive.
After discussing it, he said NSP suggested that they would
do that for $50,000 to help offset the costs.
Jullie said NSP had also suggested a program whereby any
hookups to the new underground line within the next five
years would be an offset to the $50,000 charge. He said
Staff hasn't researched this yet, but NSP is quite anxious
to get a decision.
Bentley asked where we would get the $50,000 from. Jullie
responded it could come from the General Fund.
Pidcock asked how many new users would be coming in on the
new line. Jullie said there should be a number on the
south side of the road near the MTS and Carpenter property
since it would be a better power supply as a primary feed
line. However, there would be no guarantee we would get any
money back.
Anderson asked when the payments would be due. Jullie said
we would probably have to put the money up right away.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to accept
Mr. Jullie's recommendation regarding the underground wires.
Motion carried unanimously.
2. City Manager Performance Review Process
City Manager Jullie referred to his outline and memo regard-
ing the steps pursued to develop the performance review.
He outlined the procedure to be used in developing the
performance review.
City Council Minutes 11 October 20, 1987
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve
the recommendations of the City Manager for the performance
review process. Motion carried unanimously.
C. Report of City Attorney
There was no report.
D. Report of Director of Planning
There was no report.
E. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Edenvale Trail (EAW)
Director of Community Services Lambert reviewed the history
of this project.
Anderson asked if a timeline has been drawn up for this
project. Lambert said there are some suggestions but no
recommendations. He said the Parks Commission concurred
that there would be no reason to put asphalt on the trail
unless the residents requested it.
Anderson said he had a concern about this as well as other
trails that, once the vegetation wears off, they become
muddy and unusable. Lambert said they don't anticipate
the kind of traffic that will wear down the grass. He
said they are planning to put 8-inch culverts and fill in
at the three areas that are underwater and would cover those
areas with woodchips to keep the trail high and dry.
Charles Dayton, an attorney representing some of the
residents in the area, said the residents are concerned about
the effects of this proposed trail corridor. He said it is
their legal position that this segment of the trail is only a
small portion of a much larger project and that, because it
is related, the entire project must be studied before pieces
of it are built. He distributed a memorandum prepared by
one of the residents containing information supporting
their position that the project is part of an overall
trail project for Eden Prairie.
Peterson said neither the Councilmembers nor the City
Attorney had this information available before the meeting
and he would like the opportunity to review this before
further action is taken on this project. Mr. Dayton said
he would like time to review a piece of the EAW that he
considers to be very important.
City Council Minutes 12 October 20, 1987
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to continue
this item to the next City Council meeting. Motion carried
unanimously.
Peterson noted that any further printed material should
be made available for the Council to read prior to the next
Council meeting. Bentley also noted that he would like to
get a written presentation from the City Attorney on our
previous discussions about this project.
2. Request authorization to hire Appraiser for Riley Lake
acquisition
Director of Community Services Lambert referred to his memo
of October 9th requesting authorization to hire an appraiser
for the Riley Lake Park acquisition. He said there is a
list of approved appraisers for the state, and we will prob-
ably select three to submit bids.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to authorize
the request to hire an appraiser for the Riley Lake Park
acquisition. Motion carried unanimously.
F. Report of Director of Public Works
There was no report.
XI. NEW BUSINESS
There was none.
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock to adjourn at 10:10 PM.
Motion carried unanimously.
r),"74CA
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 87-310
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF PROPERTY TO
STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR STATE HIGHWAY #5 RIGHT-OF-WAY
WHEREAS, in order to upgrade Highway #5, the State of Minnesota has found it
necessary to acquire more right-of-way;
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie owns, by way of tax forfeiture, the
properties of the southwest corner of State Highway #5 (W. 78th Street)
and School Road; and
WHEREAS, the City Staff has reviewed the proposed plans and concur with the
needed acquisition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie, Minnesota:
The Mayor and the City Clerk are authorized to sign (1) an "Offer to
Sell and Memorandum of Conditions", (2) a "Quit Claim Deed" with the
State of Minnesota to sell the needed property for the consideration
of $1,400.00. The description of said property acquisition and
conditions are included in the two documents referred to in this
paragraph.
ADOPTED by the City Council on November 17, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
9,300
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-303
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
SHADY OAK RIDGE
WHEREAS, the plat of SHADY OAK RIDGE has been submitted in a manner required
for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462
of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder,
and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for SHADY OAK RIDGE is approved upon compliance
with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat
dated November 9, 1987.
B. Variance-is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving
the six-month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the
preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said
engineer's report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of
this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named
plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the
certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance
with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on November 17, 187.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician
DATE: November 9, 1987
SUBJECT: SHADY OAK RIDGE
r71/-
PROPOSAL: The Developer, Joe Ruzic, has requested City Council approval
of the final plat of Shady Oak Ridge. Located west of Old Shady
Oak Road and north of Rowland Road, the plat contains 16.34 acres
to be divided into 13 single-family lots, 2 Outlots and right-of-
way dedication for street purposes. Outlots A and B contain 2.58
and 7.04 acres respectively. Ownership of these Outlots will be
retained by the Developer for future development.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by City Council July 15,
1986, per resolution #86-166.
Ordinance #38-86, removing land from RM6.5 to R1-13.5 zoning district,
was finally read and approved at the City Council meeting held
September 2, 1986.
The Developer's Agreement, referred to within this report, was
executed September 2, 1987.
VARIANCES: A variance from the requirements of City Code 12.20, SUBD. 2.A,
waiving the six-month maximum time elapse between the approval date of
the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be necessary.
All other variance requests must be processed through the Board of
Appeals.
STREETS 11 UTILITIES: All municipal streets, utilities, and walkways will be
installed in conformance to City Code and the requirements of the
Developer's Agreement. Shady Oak Ridge Road (to be re-named Cherokee
Trail) will eventually intersect with Rowland Road. Until that connec-
tion is made, a temporary turn-around will be necessary. Prior to
release of the final plat, an easement encompassing the temporary turn-
around shall be given to the City.
PAGE 2 OF 2
SHADY OAK RIDGE NOVEMBER 9, 1987
PARK DEDICATION: Requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's
Agreement.
BONDING: Bonding shall conform to City Code and Developer's Agreement
requirements.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Shady Oak Ridge
subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's
Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of street sign fee of $499.00.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee of $2,662.00.
3. Receipt of engineering fee of $520.00.
4. Receipt of temporary easement for temporary turn-around.
9,403
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-304
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
BERNE ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of BERNE ADDITION has been submitted in a manner required for
platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of
the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for BERNE ADDITION is approved upon compliance
with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat
dated November 10, 1987.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving
the six-month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the
preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said
engineer's report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of
this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named
plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the
certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance
with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on November 17, 1987.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
SEAL
John D. Frane, CfiWk
a go Lj
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician
DATE: November 10, 1987
SUBJECT: BERNE ADDITION
PROPOSAL: The Developer, Donald Berne is requesting City Coun
c
i
l
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
the final plat of Berne Addition, a two lot single family s
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
located east of Franklin Circle and north of Valley View R
o
a
d
.
T
h
e
p
l
a
t
contains 1.04 acres on a homesteaded parcel, the proposal b
e
i
n
g
t
o
d
i
v
i
d
e
into two equal sized lots.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council Ma
r
c
h
1
7
,
1
9
8
7
,
per Resolution #87-73.
The property is currently zoned R1-22, which was originally
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
i
n
1969.
VARIANCES: A variance from minimum lot frontage was grante
d
b
y
t
h
e
B
o
a
r
d
o
f
Appeals April 9, 1987, and a lot size variance for Lot 2 was
g
r
a
n
t
e
d
July 9, 1987.
A variance from the requirements of City Code 12.20, SUBD. 2.A,
w
a
i
v
i
n
g
the six-month maximum time elapse between the approval date
o
f
t
h
e
preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be neces
s
a
r
y
.
A
l
l
other variance requests must be processed through the Board
o
f
A
p
p
e
a
l
s
.
UTILITIES & STREETS: All municipal utlities and streets are
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
available to serve the site.
PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are c
o
v
e
r
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Code.
BONDING: Requirements for bonding are covered in the City C
o
d
e
.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Ber
n
e
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
to the requirements of this report and the following:
1. Receipt of engineering fee of $250.00
2. Reimbursement of printing costs in the amount of $30.00
2,q0S
76)
A .
Asst. to V.P. - Engrg.
CHICAGO AND TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
312/559-6294
November 3, 1987
28-27-51
City Clerk
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Dr.
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Sir:
Attached are duplicate copies of a proposed license agreement to
cover a 24 inch water main under our track and right of way at
Eden Prairie.
Please arrange for execution and attesting of both copies, and
return them both, along with a certified copy of resolution
authorizing the execution, to me for my further handling. A fully
executed copy of the license will be returned to you for your
record at that time.
Very truly yours,
cc: R. H. Gilbertson
J. C. Domski
JN/3/jc 17
ONENORTHWESTERNCENTER/CHICAGO.ILLINOIS60608
)(n
Form 2036 - Page 1
Revised 1981
CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY (hereinafter called "Company") hereby li-
censes the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA (hereinafter
c
a
l
l
e
d
"
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
"
)
t
o
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
,
maintain and use a 24 inch water main (hereinafter called
"
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
"
)
u
p
o
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
n
d
under the track of the Company at Eden Prairie, Minnesota i
n
t
h
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
,
a
n
d
i
n
accordance with the specifications shown on map dated Octob
e
r
2
7
,
1
9
8
7
h
e
r
e
t
o
a
t
t
a
c
h
e
d
m
a
r
k
e
d
Exhibit "A" and, by this reference, made a part hereof.
The foregoing license given upon such express terms and co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
a
s
a
r
e
i
n
s
e
r
t
e
d
b
e
l
o
w
,
as well as those contained upon the subsequent printed p
a
g
e
s
,
a
n
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
a
t
a
n
y
time violate any of said terms or conditions, or use or a
t
t
e
m
p
t
t
o
u
s
e
s
a
i
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
f
o
r
a
n
y
other or different purpose than that above specified, then
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
m
a
y
,
a
t
i
t
s
o
p
t
i
o
n
,
i
m
-
mediately revoke this license.
The foregoing license is subject to the following conditions
:
The Licensee shall require its contractor to furnish the C
o
m
p
a
n
y
a
c
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
e
o
f
i
n
s
u
r
-
ance, with the Company named as additional insured, show
i
n
g
a
m
o
u
n
t
s
a
n
d
t
y
p
e
s
o
f
i
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
carried by the contractor which shall provide public liabi
l
i
t
y
i
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
f
o
r
b
o
d
i
l
y
i
n
j
u
r
y
a
n
d
property damage on behalf of the Company in an amount of
n
o
t
l
e
s
s
t
h
a
n
$
2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
c
o
m
b
i
n
e
d
-ingle limits per occurrence. The certificate shall contain
a
c
o
m
m
i
t
m
e
n
t
b
y
t
h
e
i
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
c
o
m
-
ny that it will give the Company thirty days advance noti
c
e
o
f
a
n
y
c
a
n
c
e
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
o
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
in the insurance coverage shown on such certificate. Such
i
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
i
s
t
o
b
e
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
Company before the Licensee permits the contractor to proce
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
a
i
d
f
a
-
cility.
For the privileges herein permitted the Licensee shall p
a
y
t
o
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
,
i
n
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
,
a
charge of One Hundred Eighty Dollars ($180.00) per a
n
n
u
m
,
o
r
f
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
t
h
e
r
e
o
f
,
b
e
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
December 1, 1987, subject to revision at any anniversary billing date.
FIRST. The work of construction and maintenance shall be done
a
n
d
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
i
n
g
o
o
d
and workmanlike manner at the sole expense of the said
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
.
S
a
i
d
w
o
r
k
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
o
n
e
i
n
such manner as in no way to interfere with or endanger the
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
r
t
r
a
c
k
s
o
f
t
h
e
Company, or the operation thereon of any engines, cars
o
r
t
r
a
i
n
s
.
T
h
e
C
h
i
e
f
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
Company shall have the right to inspect such work from tim
e
t
o
t
i
m
e
a
n
d
t
o
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
u
c
h
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
to be made as will in his opinion decrease the hazards in
c
i
d
e
n
t
t
o
s
a
i
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
;
b
u
t
a
n
y
s
u
c
h
inspection or required changes or any failure to so inspe
c
t
,
o
r
t
o
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
t
o
b
e
m
a
d
e
,
shall not effect any of the obligations assumed by the sai
d
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
h
e
r
e
u
n
d
e
r
.
SECOND. The said Licensee shall bear the cost of all protection w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
m
a
y
require for its tracks or property during construction an
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
h
e
r
e
b
y
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
e
d
a
n
d
o
f
all repairs, changes, additions or betterments to said Co
m
p
a
n
y
'
s
t
r
a
c
k
o
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
m
a
d
e
n
e
c
e
s
-
sary on account of same. If in the judgement of the Compa
n
y
i
t
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
support for its tracks during the work of construction or
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
w
i
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
such support, and the entire cost thereof will be paid by
t
h
e
s
a
i
d
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
p
r
o
m
p
t
l
y
u
p
o
n
r
e
-
ceipt of bill therefor.
') . 0-, 1 1
Form 2036 - Page 2
Revised 1981
THIRD. The Licensee shall pay all taxes, general
a
n
d
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
,
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
f
e
e
s
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
charges which may become due or which m
a
y
b
e
assessed against the premises of the Company because of the construction, existence, op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
u
s
e
o
f
s
a
i
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
,
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
,
o
r
t
h
e
'
business conducted in connection with sa
i
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
,
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
r
e
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
f
o
r
a
n
y
such taxes, license fees or other charge
w
h
i
c
h
m
a
y
b
e
p
a
i
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
p
r
o
m
p
t
l
y
u
p
o
n
t
h
e
presentation by the Company of bills there
f
o
r
.
FOURTH. The said Licensee will give to the Chief
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
a
t
l
e
a
s
t
t
e
n
days' notice in writing before entering u
p
o
n
t
h
e
r
i
g
h
t
o
f
w
a
y
o
f
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
f
o
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
purposes, or for the purpose of making n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
.
T
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
s
t
h
e
r
i
g
h
t
t
o
judge of the necessity of repairs to sa
i
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
,
a
n
d
t
o
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
t
o
m
a
k
e
s
u
c
h
repairs upon ten days' notice in writi
n
g
.
I
n
s
u
c
h
c
a
s
e
,
s
a
i
d
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
m
a
y
e
n
t
e
r
u
p
o
n
s
a
i
d
right of way without the ten days' notice above referr
e
d
t
o
,
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
p
r
o
c
e
e
d
f
o
r
t
h
w
i
t
h
t
o
make such repairs, and upon failure to d
o
s
o
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
e
n
d
a
y
s
,
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
s
h
a
l
l
h
a
v
e
t
h
e
r
i
g
h
t
to make said repairs and collect the
e
n
t
i
r
e
c
o
s
t
t
h
e
r
e
o
f
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
.
T
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
reserves the right, in case in its opini
o
n
t
h
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
o
f
i
t
s
t
r
a
c
k
s
o
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
d
e
m
a
n
d
s
i
t
,
t
o
make emergency repairs without notice t
o
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
a
n
d
t
o
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
t
h
e
c
o
s
t
t
h
e
r
e
o
f
f
r
o
m
'Licensee as herein provided.
FIFTH. Licensee agrees that in the construction,
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
,
a
n
d
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
,
It will comply with all applicable laws,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
,
b
u
t
n
o
t
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
t
o
,
a
n
y
l
a
w
s
,
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
,
regulations, or permit requirements relat
i
n
g
t
o
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
p
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
o
r
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
t
o
occupational health and safety; and Licen
s
e
e
a
g
r
e
e
s
t
o
i
n
d
e
m
n
i
f
y
a
n
d
h
o
l
d
h
a
r
m
l
e
s
s
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
from any and all claims, demands, lawsuit
,
o
r
l
i
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
f
o
r
l
o
s
s
,
f
i
n
e
s
,
d
a
m
a
g
e
,
i
n
j
u
r
y
,
a
n
d
death and all expenses and costs, includi
n
g
a
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
s
'
f
e
e
s
,
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
o
r
a
r
i
s
i
n
g
o
u
t
o
f
the construction, maintenance, or use of
t
h
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
a
n
y
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
o
r
e
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
therefrom or for the violation of any law,
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
,
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
,
o
r
p
e
r
m
i
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
r
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
to environmental pollution or contami
n
a
t
i
o
n
,
o
r
t
o
o
c
c
u
p
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
h
e
a
l
t
h
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
SIXTH. It is understood by the Licens
e
e
t
h
a
t
s
a
i
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
i
s
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
a
n
d
may 'ncrease the dangers and hazards of the ope
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
r
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
o
f
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
,
a
n
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
i
s
license is subject to all risks thereof.
T
h
e
r
e
f
o
r
e
,
a
n
d
a
s
a
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
Company for entering into this license a
n
d
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
w
i
l
l
n
o
t
e
n
t
e
r
s
a
m
e
,
Licensee agrees to assume and pay for al
l
l
o
s
s
o
r
d
a
m
a
g
e
t
o
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
w
h
a
t
s
o
e
v
e
r
,
a
n
d
i
n
j
u
r
y
t
o
or death of any person, or persons who
m
s
o
e
v
e
r
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
a
l
l
c
o
s
t
s
a
n
d
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
i
n
c
i
d
e
n
t
thereto, however arising from or in con
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
e
x
i
s
t
e
n
c
e
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
,
repair, renewal, reconstruction, operat
i
o
n
,
u
s
e
o
r
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
o
f
s
a
i
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
,
o
r
a
n
y
d
e
f
e
c
t
therein or failure thereof, or the fail
u
r
e
o
f
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
o
r
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
r
s
,
a
g
e
n
t
s
o
r
employees of the Licensee to abide by or
c
o
m
p
l
y
w
i
t
h
a
n
y
o
f
t
h
e
t
e
r
m
s
o
r
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
i
s
license; and the Licensee forever inde
m
n
i
f
i
e
s
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
,
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
a
n
d
a
g
r
e
e
s
t
o
s
a
v
e
i
t
harmless from any and all claims, demand
s
,
l
a
w
s
u
i
t
s
o
r
l
i
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
f
o
r
a
n
y
s
u
c
h
l
o
s
s
,
d
a
m
a
g
e
,
injury and death, costs and expense, eve
n
t
h
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
'
s
r
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
m
a
y
have caused or contributed thereto. No
t
i
c
e
t
o
o
r
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
b
y
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
o
f
a
n
y
a
c
t
o
r
omission by the Licensee which is or migh
t
b
e
a
b
r
e
a
c
h
b
y
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
o
f
a
n
y
o
f
t
h
e
t
e
r
m
s
o
r
conditions of this Agreement to be perf
o
r
m
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
a
c
q
u
i
e
s
c
e
n
s
e
b
y
t
n
e
Company in or to such act or omission, sh
a
l
l
n
e
i
t
h
e
r
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
t
o
r
e
l
i
e
v
e
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
o
f
any obligation assumed by it under this p
a
r
a
g
r
a
p
h
n
o
r
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
t
o
b
e
a
w
a
i
v
e
r
o
r
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
by the Company of any rights granted to i
t
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
i
s
p
a
r
a
g
r
a
p
h
.
SEVENTH. The Company reserves the right
t
o
u
s
e
,
o
c
c
u
p
y
a
n
d
e
n
j
o
y
i
t
s
t
r
a
c
k
s
,
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
and right of way, for such purpose, in
s
u
c
h
m
a
n
n
e
r
,
a
n
d
a
t
s
u
c
h
t
i
m
e
a
s
i
t
s
h
a
l
l
d
e
s
i
r
e
,
the same as if this instrument had not been
e
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
b
y
i
t
.
I
f
a
n
y
s
u
c
h
u
s
e
s
h
a
l
l
n
e
c
e
s
s
i
t
a
t
e
a
n
y
change, repair, renewal, removal or re
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
a
i
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
,
o
r
a
n
y
p
a
r
t
t
h
e
r
e
o
f
,
t
h
e
Licensee shall perform such work at such
t
i
m
e
a
s
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
m
a
y
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
a
n
d
i
f
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
fails to do so such work may be performed
b
y
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
a
t
t
h
e
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
and the
said Company shail not be liable to the
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
o
n
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
o
f
a
n
y
d
a
m
a
g
e
g
r
o
w
i
n
g
o
u
t
o
f
any -se which the Company may make
o
f
i
t
s
t
r
a
c
k
s
,
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
o
f
w
a
y
.
In case any of the terms or provisions of
t
h
i
s
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
o
r
c
a
r
r
i
e
d
o
u
t
prior to the actual date of execution he
r
e
o
f
,
i
t
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
s
t
o
o
d
a
n
d
a
g
r
e
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
i
s
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
shall nevertheless be of the same force
a
n
d
e
f
f
e
c
t
a
s
t
h
o
u
g
h
s
a
m
e
h
a
d
b
e
e
n
e
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
parties prior to such performance.
Form 2036 - Page 3A
Revised 1981
EIGHTH. The Company shall have the right at any time
t
o
r
e
v
o
k
e
t
h
i
s
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
b
y
g
i
v
i
n
g
thirty days' notice in writing to the Licens
e
e
a
n
d
a
t
t
h
e
e
x
p
i
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
t
i
m
e
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
b
y
said notice, or upon any other revocation o
f
t
h
i
s
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
,
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
s
h
a
l
l
p
r
o
m
p
t
l
y
,
a
n
d
i
n
the manner directed by said Chief Engineer,
r
e
m
o
v
e
a
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
h
e
r
e
b
y
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
e
d
f
r
o
m
the premises of the Company and leave said p
r
e
m
i
s
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
i
n
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
before the installation of the same. Upon d
e
f
a
u
l
t
o
f
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
s
o
t
o
d
o
,
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
m
a
y
remove the same and restore its premises, an
d
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
w
i
l
l
p
r
o
m
p
t
l
y
p
a
y
t
o
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
t
h
e
cost of so doing.
NINTH. The waiver of a breach of any of the terms o
r
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
h
e
r
e
o
f
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
limited to the act or acts constituting such
b
r
e
a
c
h
,
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
n
e
v
e
r
b
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
e
d
a
s
b
e
i
n
g
a continuing or permanent waiver of any such
t
e
r
m
s
o
r
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
,
a
l
l
o
f
w
h
i
c
h
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
a
n
d
remain in full force and effect as to future
a
c
t
s
o
r
h
a
p
p
e
n
i
n
g
s
,
n
o
t
w
i
t
h
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g
a
n
y
s
u
c
h
waiver.
TENTH. - This license is personal to said Li
c
e
n
s
e
e
a
n
d
i
s
n
o
t
a
s
s
i
g
n
a
b
l
e
o
r
transferable, without the written consent of
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
b
e
i
n
g
f
i
r
s
t
o
b
t
a
i
n
e
d
.
ELEVENTH. In further consideration of the Company's giv
i
n
g
t
o
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
t
h
e
r
i
g
h
t
s
a
n
d
privileges above specified, the Licensee, b
y
t
h
e
a
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
t
h
i
s
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
,
h
e
r
e
b
y
a
g
r
e
e
s
t
h
a
t
It will not levy or assess any special tax or
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
o
r
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
o
r
upon Company's properties for the construct
i
o
n
o
r
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
w
h
i
c
h
s
a
i
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
is a part; and, the Licensee hereby forever
i
n
d
e
m
n
i
f
i
e
s
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
a
n
d
a
g
r
e
e
s
t
o
s
a
v
e
Company harmless from any and all claims, d
e
m
a
n
d
s
,
l
a
w
s
u
i
t
s
o
r
l
i
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
w
h
a
t
s
o
e
v
e
r
f
o
r
a
n
y
qch special tax or special assessment. If n
o
t
w
i
t
h
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
f
o
r
e
g
o
i
n
g
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
a
n
y
s
u
c
h
„lecial tax or special assessment shall be le
v
i
e
d
o
r
a
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
o
r
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
s
a
i
d
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
'
s
properties, the Company shall have the foll
o
w
i
n
g
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
w
i
t
:
(a) Company may make such payments as may be ne
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
t
o
s
a
t
i
s
f
y
a
n
d
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
a
n
y
l
i
e
n
s
for such special tax or special assessment
a
n
d
i
n
c
a
s
e
o
f
s
u
c
h
p
a
y
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
agrees to make repayment on demand with int
e
r
e
s
t
a
t
t
h
e
r
a
t
e
o
f
f
i
v
e
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
(
5
%
)
per annum from the date of such payment so
m
a
d
e
b
y
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
.
(b) Company may file this license agreement for
r
e
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
o
f
t
h
e
R
e
c
o
r
d
e
r
of Deeds of the county in which said propert
i
e
s
a
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
n
d
s
u
c
h
f
i
l
i
n
g
s
h
a
l
l
constitute a complete discharge and release
o
f
a
n
y
l
i
e
n
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
s
a
i
d
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
'
s
properties for such special tax or special
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
.
(c) Company may terminate this license by filing
n
o
t
i
c
e
o
f
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
s
u
c
h
R
e
c
o
r
d
e
r
of Deeds for recording and forwarding a copy
t
h
e
r
e
o
f
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
c
e
r
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
r
r
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
mail, postage prepaid to Licensee whereupon
a
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
s
,
p
r
i
v
i
l
e
g
e
s
a
n
d
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
s
herein granted to Licensee shall immediately
c
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
r
i
g
h
t
o
f
Company to make immediate re-entry and witho
u
t
a
n
y
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
o
b
l
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
r
a
n
y
liability on the part of Company in respect
t
o
a
n
y
p
a
y
m
e
n
t
s
,
s
e
t
o
f
f
s
,
c
o
u
n
t
e
r
c
l
a
i
m
s
,
recoupment, crossbills or cross demands.
All rights, remedies and elections of Compa
n
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
.
TWELFTH. Licensee further agrees that there
i
s
n
o
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
t
o
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
'
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
,
either for railroad use or for any possible
u
s
e
i
n
t
h
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
:ility or project of which said facility is
a
p
a
r
t
.
e) • 1 a
‘-j I
Form 2036 - Page 4h
Revised 1981
In Witness Whereof this instrument is executed this
ATTEST: CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
By
Assistant Secretary Vice President - Engineering
Pursuant to authority granted by resolution of the
of the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, adopted
The undersigned, the Licensee mentioned in the foregoing li
c
e
n
s
e
,
h
e
r
e
b
y
a
c
c
e
p
t
s
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
subject to the terms and conditions therein stated.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
Attest:
By (Seal)
Mayor
City Clerk
day of ,19
910
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 87-305
RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND
ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT
WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed to
m
a
k
e
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
improvements:
I.C. 52-132 (Franlo Road South of Prairie Center Drive)
and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of th
e
c
o
s
t
o
f
t
h
e
improvements, pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Chapter 429.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Cou
n
c
i
l
:
That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engi
n
e
e
r
f
o
r
study with the assistance of Hanson, Thorp, Pellinen and Ol
s
o
n
,
a
n
d
t
h
a
t
a feasibility report shall be prepared and presented to the
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
with all convenient speed advising the Council in a prelimi
n
a
r
y
w
a
y
a
s
t
o
the scope, cost assessment and feasibility of the proposed
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
ADOPTEd by the Eden Prairie City Council on November 17, 19
8
7
.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM:
Alan Gray, City Engineer
DATE:
November 12, 1987
SUBJECT: FRANLO ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
The Developers of the Lund's Center Site at t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
Center Drive and Frani° Road have petitioned
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
for utility improvements to service the site
a
n
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
F
r
a
n
l
o
Road south of Prairie Center Drive.
The Engineering Division recommends that the
s
c
o
p
e
o
f
a
f
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
study include Franlo Road from Prairie Center
D
r
i
v
e
t
o
G
r
i
e
r
L
a
n
e
,
a
n
d
also consider a connection between Franlo Roa
d
a
n
d
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
e
n
d
o
f
Medcom Boulevard. This segment of Frani° Road
i
s
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1
2
5
0
feet in length. The Lund's Center Site front
s
t
h
i
s
s
e
g
m
e
n
t
o
f
F
r
a
n
l
o
Road for a distance of approximately 330 feet
.
T
h
e
L
u
n
d
'
s
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
therefore represents considerably less than 3
5
%
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
b
u
t
t
i
n
g
this segment of Franlo Road. It will be a req
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
M
S
A
4
2
9
t
h
a
t
the resolution ordering aleasibility study of
t
h
i
s
s
c
o
p
e
b
e
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
b
y
a minimum four-fifths majority vote of the Cou
n
c
i
l
.
AG:ss
29112
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, P.E.
Director of Public Works
DATE: November 17, 1987
RE: MWCC Easements for Red Rock Interceptor
The attached easement document provides for the installation of
the Red Rock Interceptor through City owned property -- particularly
City park property. The two locations of the easements are in the
Starring Park area immediately adjacent and south of Research Road and
temporary easements along the southerly side of Miller Park.
In accordance with the joint agreement with Metropolitan Council for the
Red Rock Interceptor, the City is obligated to provide easements where
practical. Mr. Lambert has reviewed the easement documents and find
them to be in order. I therefore recommend that the Council authorize
the Mayor and City Manager to execute the documents.
EAD:ss
RR-1, RR-2, RR-3, RR-4, RR-5,
RR-7, RR-8, and RR-26
EASEMENT
THIS INSTRUMENT, made this
day of , 19
by and between Eden Prairie, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, of the
County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, Grantor, and the Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission, a duly constituted agency of the Metropoli-
tan Council created and organized pursuant to Minnesota Laws 1975,
Chapter 13, Minnesota Statutes 5473.503, Grantee;
WITNESSETH, that Grantor, in consideration of One Dollar and
other good and valuable considerations to it in hand paid by Grantee,
the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant,
bargain, sell, and convey to Grantee, its successors and assigns, the
following described easements for sewer and utility purposes:
SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF FOR
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENTS
The above described easement includes the rights of Grantee, its
contractors, agents and employees to do whatever is necessary for
enjoyment of the rights granted herein including the right to enter
the easement for purposes of constructing, operating, maintaining,
altering, repairing, replacing, and/or removing said sewers and utili-
ties.
Grantor covenants that it is the Owner and is in possession of
the above described premises and has lawful right and authority to
convey and grant the easement described herein.
Grantee agrees to restore the property to as close to or better
than its original condition prior to construction, including the
replacement of the existing asphalt bike path.
This conveyance is exempt from State Deed Tax pursuant to M.S.A.
5287.22.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has caused this Easement to
be executed as of the date noted above.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, A MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
By
By
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
On the day of , 19 , before me a notary
public within and for said County, personally appeared
respectively, named In the foregoing instrument, and that said instru-
ment was signed on behalf of said City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota
Municipal Corporation, by authority of its
and
acknowledged said Instrument to be the free act and deed of said
City of Eden Prairie.
Its
Its
Notary Publia
DRAFTED BY:
Jeanne K. Matross
License No. 68615
Metropolitan Waste Control
Commission
350 Metro Square Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
222-8423
-2-
:,013g
' EASEMENT DESCRIPTION NO. RR-1(revised). •
A 50.00 foot perpetual easement for sanitary sewer purposes over,
- under and across the following described property:
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of
Section 22, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin county, Minnesota,
according to the .Government .Survey thereof described as
beginning at a point on the West line of said Northeast Quarter
distant 2106.10 feet south from the Northwest corner thereof;
'thence North 64 degrees 40 minutes East a distance of 117.10
feet; thence .South 8 degrees 38 minutes East a distance of
167.40 feet; thence South 19 degrees 26 minutes West a distance
of 163.80 feet;- thence South 40 degrees 10 minutes West a
distance of 118.60 feet to a point in the West line of said
Northeast Quarter distant 360.60 feet south from the point of
beginning; thence North along said West line of the Northeast
Quarter to the point of beginning. For the purpose of this
description the west line of the Northeast Quarter of Section
22 is assumed to have a bearing of North.
Said perpetual easement being described as that part of the above
described property lying 10.00 feet to the left of and 40.00 feet
to the right of the following described line:
Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Northeast Qudrter of
Section 22; thence on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 08
minutes 08 seconds. West.along the West line of said Northeast
Quarter a distance of 457.27 feet'to the point of beginning of
the line to be described; thence North 59 degrees 02 minutes 53
seconds East a distance of 104.00 and there terminating.
Also a perpetual easement .for sanitary sewer purposes over, under
and across that part of the East 25.00 feet of the above described
property which lies northerly of a line distant 100.00 feet
southerly of and parallel 'With, as measured at right angles to,
the southerly right of way line of Research Road.
Together with a temporary easement for construction purposes over,
under and across the above described property lying southerly of
the southerly right of way line of Research Road, as said road is
now laid out and travelled and northerly of a line described as
being 80.00 feet southerly of as measured at right angles to and
parallel with the first above described line and its easterly
extension to the East line of the above described property.
Excepting therefrom the above described permanent easement.
The sidelines of the above described easements are to be prolonged
or shortened to terminate at the easterly and westerly lines of
the above described property.
Temporary easement to expire on or before 19 •
Sheet 2 of 2
ot•
it:1k
mWCC PROJECT NO. 82-53-329
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION NO. RR-2(revised)
A 20.00 foot perpetual easement for sanitary sewer purposes over,
under and across the following described property:
That part of Government Lot 4, Section 22, Township 116, Range
22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the Government
Survey thereof described as beginning at the Southeast corner
of said Government Lot 4; thence westerly along the South line
thereof. 77.50 feet; thence northerly to the centerline of
Research Road along a line which if extended would intersect
the Northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter; thence easterly
along said centerline to the East line of the Northwest
Quarter; thence South along said East line to the point of
beginning.
Excepting roadway.
Said perpetual easement being described as that part of the above
described property lying 10.00 feet on either side of the
following described line:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of Government Lot 4; thence
on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 08 minutes 08 seconds
West along the East line of said Government Lot 4 a distance of
457.27 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be
described; thence South 59 degrees 02 minutes 53 seconds West a
distance of 75.82 feet, more or less, to the west line of the
above described property and there terminating.
Together with a temporary easement for construction purposes over,
under and across the above described property lying southerly of
the southerly'right of way line of Research Road, as said road is
now laid out and travelled and northerly of a line described as
being 80.00 feet southerly of as measured at right angles to and
parallel with the first above described line.
Excepting therefrom the above described permanent easement.
The sidelines of the above described easements are to be prolonged
or shortened to terminate at the easterly and westerly lines of
the above described property.
Temporary easement to expire on or before 19 . .
Sheet 2 of 2
A
MWCC PROJECT NO. 82-53-329
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION NO. RR-3(revised)
A 20.00 foot perpetual easement for sanitary sewer purposes over,
under and across the following described property:
That part of Government Lot 4, Section 22, Township 116, Range
22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the Government
Survey thereof described as beginning at a point in the South
line of said Government Lot 4 distant 77.50 feet westerly from
the Southeast corner thereof; thence northerly to the
centerline of Research Road along a line which if extended
would intersect the Northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter
of said Section 22; thence southwesterly along said road
centerline a distance of 231.80 feet; thence southerly to a
point in the South line of said Government Lot 4 distant 192.50
feet West from the point of beginning; thence East to the point
of beginning.
Excepting roadway.
Said perpetual easement being described as that part of the above
described property lying 10.00 feet on either side of the following described line:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of Government Lot 4; thence
on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 08 minutes 08 seconds
West along the East line of said Government Lot 4 a distance of
457.27 feet; thence South 59 degrees 02 minutes 53 seconds West
a distance of 75.82 feet to the point of beginning of the line
to be described; thence continuing South 59 degrees 02 minutes
53 seconds West a distance of 238.31 feet, more or less, to the
West line of the above described property and there
terminating.
Together with a temporary easement for construction purposes over,
under and across the above described property lying southerly of
the southerly right of way line of Research Road, as said road is
now laid out and travelled and northerly of a line described as
being 80.00 feet southerly of as measured at right angles to and
parallel with the first above described line.
Excepting therefrom the above described permanent easement.
The sidelines of the above described easements are to be prolonged
or shortened to terminate at the easterly and westerly lines of
the above described property.
Temporary easement to expire on or before
19
Sheet 2 of 2
PagemERMAcRYPTIWAO:1R-4(revised)
A 20.00 foot perpetual easement for sanitary sewer purposes over, under and across the following described property:
That part of Government Lot 4, Section 22, Township 116, Range
22, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying South of Research Road and
West of the East 270.00 feet thereof.
Said perpetual easement being described as that part of the above
described property lying 10.00 feet on either side of the
following described line:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of Government Lot 4; thence
on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 08 minutes 08 seconds
West, along the East line of said Government Lot 4, a distance
of 457.27 feet; thence South 59 degrees 02 minutes 53 seconds
West a distance of 314.13 feet to the West line of said East
270.00 feet and the point of beginning of the line to be
described; thence continuing South 59 degrees 02 minutes 53
seconds West a distance of 59.29 feet; thence southwesterly a
distance of 16.15 feet along a tangential curve concave to the
Northwest, said curve having a radius of 30.50 feet and a
central angle of 30 degrees 20 minutes 05 seconds; thence South
89 degrees 22 minutes 58 seconds West, tangent to last
described curve, a distance of 186.35 feet; thence North 74
degrees 45 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 400.96 feet;
thence North 78 degrees 05 minutes 22 seconds West a distance
of 393.54 feet; thence South 89 degrees 43 minutes 36 seconds
West a distance of 38.00 feet, more or less, to the West line
of said Government Lot 4 and there terminating.
Together with a temporary easement for construction purposes over,
under and across the above described property lying southerly of the southerly right of way line of Research Road, as said road is
now laid out and travelled and northerly of a line described as
being 50.00 feet southerly of as measured at right angles to and
parallel with the first above described line.
Also a temporary easement for construction purposes over, under
and across the above described property lying northerly of a line
described as being 50.00 feet southerly of as measured at right
angles to and parallel with the following described line:
Commencing at the point of beginning of the first above
described line; thence on an assumed bearing of South 59
degrees 02 minutes 53 seconds a distance of 67.56 feet to the
point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 89
degrees 22 minutes 58 seconds East a distance of 60.00 feet,
more or less, to the easterly line of the above described
property and there terminating.
Excepting therefrom the above described permanent easement.
The sidelines of the above described easements are to be prolonged
or shortened to terminate at the easterly and westerly lines of
the above described property.
Temporary easement to expire on or before , 19
e
ch..t. nf
MWCC PROJECT NO. 82-53-329
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION NO. RR-5(revised)
A 20.00 foot perpetual easement for sanitary sewer purposes over,
under and across the following described property:
That part of Government Lot 5, Section 22, Township 116, Range
22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the Government
Survey thereof, described as commencing at a point in the West
line of said Government Lot 5 distant 466.85 feet south from
the Northwest corner, thereof; thence East a distance'bf 555.00
feet; thence South 2 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds East a
distance of 400.00 feet; thence South 6 degrees 20 minutes 00
seconds East a distance of 83.50 feet to the centerline of
Research Road (formerly known as County Road No. 2); thence
easterly along said centerline a distance of 150.60 feet to the
actual point of beginning of the property to be described;
thence South 6 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East to the
northerly shoreline of Starring Lake; thence easterly along
said shoreline to the East line of said Government Lot 5;
thence North along said East line to the centerline of Research
Road; thence westerly along said centerline to the point of
beginning.
Excepting roadway.
Said perpetual easement being described as that part of the above
described property lying 10.00 feet on either side of the
following described line:
Commencing at the Government Meander Corner on the West line of
the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 22;
thence on an assumed bearing of North, along said West line of
the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 109.27 feet; thence South
40 degrees 51 minutes 12 seconds East a distance of 128.24
feet; thence North 71 degrees 43 minutes 38 seconds East a
distance of 522.66 feet; thence North 81 degrees 18 minutes 23
seconds East a distance of 402.72 feet; thence North 89 degrees
43 minutes 36 seconds East a distance of 400.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 89
degrees 43 minutes 36 seconds West a distance of 400.00 feet;
thence South 81 degrees 18 minutes 23 seconds West a distance
of 252.00 feet, more or less, to the West line of the above
described property and there terminating.
Together with a temporary easement for construction purposes over,
under and across the above described property lying southerly of
the southerly right of way line of Research Road, as said road is
now laid out and travelled and northerly of a line described as
being 50.00 feet southerly of as measured at right angles to and
parallel with the first above described line.
Excepting therefrom the above described permanent easement.
The sidelines of the above described easements are to be prolonged
or shortened to terminate at the easterly and westerly lines of
the above described property.
Temporary easement to expire on or before • 19 •
Sheet 2 of 2 29i1^,G
MWCC PROJECT NO. 82-53-329
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION NO. RR-7(revised)
A 20.00 foot perpetual easement for sanitary sewer purposes over,
under and across the following described property:
That part of Government Lot 5, Section 22, Township 116, Range
22, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as commencing at a
point in the West line of said Government Lot 5 distant 813.90
feet North from the Southwest corner thereof, thence East
parallel with the south line thereof a distance of 555.00 feet;
thence South 2 degrees 45 minutes East a distance of 400.00
feet; thence South 6 degrees 20 minutes East to a point in the
centerline of Research Road, said point being the actual point
of beginning of the land being described; thence continuing
South 6 degrees 20 minutes East to the northerly shoreline of
Starring Lake; thence westerly along said shoreline to the East
line of the West 264.91 feet of said Government Lot 5; thence
North along said East line to the centerline of said Research
Road; thence northeasterly along said centerline to the point
of beginning.
Excepting .roadway.
Said perpetual easement being described as that part of the above
described property lying 10.00 feet on either side of the
following described line:
. -
Commencing at the Government Meander Corner on the West line of
the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range 22;
thence on an assumed bearing of North, along said West line of
the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 109.27 feet; thence South
40 *degrees 51 minutes 12 seconds East a distance of 128.24
feet; thence North 71 degrees 43 minutes 38 seconds East a
distance of 522.66 feet to the point of beginning of the line
to be described; thence South 71 degrees 43 minutes 38 seconds
West a distance of 340.00 feet, more or less, to the East line
of said West 264.91 feet and there terminating.
Together with a temporary easement for construction purposes over,
under and across the above described property lying southerly of
the southerly right of way line of Research Road, as said road is
now laid out and travelled and northerly of a line described as
being 50.00 feet southerly of as measured at right angles to and
parallel with the first above described line.
Excepting therefrom the above described permanent easement.
The sidelines of the above described easements are to be prolonged
or shortened to terminate at the easterly and westerly lines of
the above described property.
Temporary easement to expire on or before I 19
Sheet 2 of 2
N
MWCC PROJECT NO. 82-53-329
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION NO. RR-8(revised)
A 20.00 foot perpetual easement for sanitary sewer purpos
e
s
o
v
e
r
,
under and across the following described property
:
That part of the West 264.91 feet of Government
L
o
t
5
,
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
22, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin Count
y
,
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
,
according to the Government Survey thereof lyi
n
g
S
o
u
t
h
o
f
t
h
e
southerly right of way line of Research Road.
Said perpetual easement being described as that p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
described property lying 10.00 feet on eit
h
e
r
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
following described line:
Commencing at the Government Meander Corner on t
h
e
W
e
s
t
l
i
n
e
o
f
the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, Township
1
1
6
,
R
a
n
g
e
2
2
;
thence on an assumed bearing of North, along sai
d
W
e
s
t
l
i
n
e
o
f
the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 109.27 fee
t
;
t
h
e
n
c
e
S
o
u
t
h
40 degrees 51 minutes 12 seconds East a dista
n
c
e
o
f
1
2
8
.
2
4
feet; thence North 71 degrees 43 minutes 38 s
e
c
o
n
d
s
E
a
s
t
a
distance of 200.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 71 degrees 43 minu
t
e
s
3
8
s
e
c
o
n
d
s
West a distance of 179.65 feet; thence westerly a distance of 35.89 feet along a tangential curve concave to t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
h
a
v
i
n
g
a radius of 30.50 feet and a central angle of
6
7
d
e
g
r
e
e
s
2
5
minutes 10 seconds; thence North 40 degrees
5
1
m
i
n
u
t
e
s
1
2
seconds West, tangent to last described curve t
o
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
e
r
l
y
right of way line of said Research Road and sa
i
d
l
i
n
e
t
h
e
r
e
terminating.
Together with a temporary easement for construct
i
o
n
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
s
o
v
e
r
,
under and across the above described property
l
y
i
n
g
s
o
u
t
h
e
r
l
y
o
f
the southerly right of way line of Research Road, as said road is now laid out and travelled and northerly of a
l
i
n
e
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
a
s
being 50.00 feet southerly and westerly of as
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
d
a
t
r
i
g
h
t
angles to and parallel with the first above desc
r
i
b
e
d
l
i
n
e
.
Excepting therefrom the above described permanen
t
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
.
The sidelines of the above described easements a
r
e
t
o
b
e
p
r
o
l
o
n
g
e
d
or shortened to terminate at the easterly and
w
e
s
t
e
r
l
y
l
i
n
e
s
o
f
the above described property.
Temporary easement to expire on or before
19
Sheet 2 of 2
t 97..
MWCC PROJECT NO. 82-53-329
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION NO. RR-26
A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under and
across the following described property:
That part of Government Lot 5, said Section 17, lying north of
the south 1106.70 feet of said Government Lot 5;
and
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of
said Section 17, lying north of the south 1106.70 feet of said
Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter.
Said temporary easement being the South 60.00 feet of the above
described property lying westerly and southwesterly of the
following described line:
Commencing at the intersection of the West line of said Government
Lot 5 and the North line of said South 1106.70 feet; thence
easterly, along said North line of the South 1106.70 feet, a
distance 2422.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be
described; thence northwesterly deflecting to the left at an angle
of 140 degrees 23 minutes 40 seconds for a distance of 95.80 feet,
more or less, to the North line of said South 60.00 feit.and there
terminating.
Sheet 2 of 2
Al3T
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
THRU:
Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM:
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE:
November 12, 1987
SUBJECT: Community Center Operation Modifications
Over the last several months Community Services Staff from the C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
the Director of Human Resources have been reviewing proposed mod
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
the efficiency and effectiveness of the operation of the Community Center. At thi
s
time, the Community Services Staff and the Human Resources Staff
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
several operation and staff modifications:
1. Staff recommends the night shift maintenance at the Community Ce
n
t
e
r
b
e
f
i
l
l
e
d
b
y
a full-time maintenance technician, rather than by several part-
t
i
m
e
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
s
.
2. Three positions have grown to a level approaching 30 hours per
w
e
e
k
,
w
h
i
c
h
b
y
definition of the City benefits program requires the City to pro
v
i
d
e
a
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
benefit package to those positions. Those positions include: a
)
W
a
t
e
r
S
a
f
e
t
y
Instructor, b) Day Care Coordinator c) Officials Coordinator. T
h
i
s
w
i
l
l
n
o
t
change the salary of these individuals, but will be adding a ben
e
f
i
t
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
the positions.
3. City staff recommends installation of a Fitness Center video sys
t
e
m
a
t
a
c
o
s
t
o
f
$4,838. This system will allow continuous monitoring of the Fitn
e
s
s
C
e
n
t
e
r
b
y
office staff and will eliminate the need for a Fitness Center Su
p
e
r
v
i
s
o
r
a
t
a
n
estimated cost of $15,000 per year.
4. Community Services Staff recommend the City council authorize ex
t
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
fitness program package, presently offered to City employees, to
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
volunteer firemen. This fitness program allows employees to use
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Center facilities two times per week free of charge. The free
u
s
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
t
h
e
swimming pool, ice rink and Fitness Center. Racquetball court
s
m
a
y
b
e
u
s
e
d
f
r
e
e
if they are available on a walk on basis; however, if employee
s
w
i
s
h
t
o
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
a
court they must pay the regular fee.
COMMUNITY CENTER MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN
There are several major reasons for recommending that the night
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
s
h
i
f
t
b
e
handled by a full-time maintenance technician rather than three
o
r
f
o
u
r
p
a
r
t
-
t
i
m
e
staff that have handled it in the past. Some of those reasons i
n
c
l
u
d
e
:
1. This position can be included in the 1988 budget without any
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
b
u
d
g
e
t
a
s
there will be a minimum of $10,000 saved in temporary wage cost
s
p
e
r
y
e
a
r
o
n
t
h
e
shift schedule alone, and an additional approximately $2,000 i
n
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
c
o
s
t
s
saved on part-time maintenance staff that are required to come
i
n
t
o
a
s
s
i
s
t
d
u
r
i
n
g
ice take down and set up. Additional savings will occur on ove
r
t
i
m
e
c
o
s
t
s
t
h
a
t
have risen dramatically over the last three years due to the nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
t
i
m
e
s
t
h
a
t
either Jeff or Tom are called in during the night shift due to
m
e
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
breakdowns. There will also be over a $10,000 savings in staff time projected for
1988 with the ability to install a video monitoring system in the Fitness Center
at a cost of $4,838, which will replace the Fitness Center Supervisor that had
been budgeted for $15,000.
2. Due to the type of part-time position, i.e. the minimal number of hours and the
type of maintenance work involved, the City is constantly training in new
personnel to work the night maintenance shift. Often about the time someome is
fully trained and able to handle the position, they quit for a job with better
hours or better pay. The man-hours that are invested into the person for training
purposes are expensive and the person still is not technically qualified to handle
most of the emergencies that occur relating to the operation of the boiler, the
Zamboni, or the compressors, therefore: either Tom Eastman or Jeff Elwell are
often called back to the Community Center to repair or correct problems that have
occurred during the night shift.
3. Very few part-time employees have the same loyalty to the City or commitment to
excellence as do full-time employees. This is often reflected in the quality of
work and the service to the public using the facility.
4. The cleaning and operation of the pool has taken more maintenance time than the
cleaning and operation of the ice arena; yet, in a comparison of other municipal
recreation facilities that contain either two ice rinks or an ice rink and a pool,
Eden Prairie has operated with fewer full-time or permanent part-time staff and
has a facility requiring more year-round maintenance than these other facilities.
The comparison to other municipal recreation facilities is as follows: I)
Burnsville Ice Arena, two indoor ice rinks, one full-time Manager, one full-time
Maintenance Supervisor, one permanent part-time maintenance and one additional
part-time maintenance (they have also requested two additional permanent part-time
maintenance for 1988). 2) Cottage Grove, one full size rink, one three-quarter
size rink operated six months per year - one full-time Manager, One full-time
Maintenance Supervisor, one full-time Building Supervisor/Maintenance and
additional part-time maintenance. 3) St. Louis Park, one full size indoor ice
rink and one outdoor swimming pool operated three months per year - one full-time
Manager, one full-time maintenance and two permanent part-time maintenance. 4)
Brooklyn Park Community Center, one year-round ice rink, meeting rooms and armory
- one full-time Maintenance Supervisor, one full-time Program Supervisor, four
temporary part-time maintenance (Brooklyn Park allows temporary part-time
maintenance to work up to 40 hours per week). 5) New Ulm, one indoor ice rink
open six months, one indoor pool, racquetball courts and meeting rooms - one full-
time Arena Manager, one full-time Pool Manager, one full-time maintenance.
The proposed Community Center Maintenance Technician would work from 7 p.m. to 3:30
a.m. on Monday, Thursday and Friday and from 12 Noon until 8:30 p.m. on Saturday and
Sunday. (When hockey games are scheduled on Saturday night the shift would be 3 p.m.
to 11:30 p.m.)
The Community Center Techician would be required to have training and experience in
operating this type of facility. Staff would recommend a starting salary in the range
of $19,000 per year (to be determined by the Personnel Department).
PROPOSAL FOR FITNESS CENTER VIDEO SYSTEM
Early in 1987, the City's insurance company required the City to have a trained staff
person in the Community Center Fitness Center whenever that room was o
p
e
n
t
o
t
h
e
public. This additional person cost the City approximately $15,000 per
y
e
a
r
a
n
d
severely limited the number of hours the Fitness Center was open during 1987.
Several weeks ago, the City received approval from the insurance repres
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
t
o
install a video monitoring system in the Fitness Center to replace the
s
t
a
f
f
p
e
r
s
o
n
.
This monitoring system must have four cameras to observe all corners of
t
h
e
f
i
t
n
e
s
s
rooms, and will be viewed from the receptionist's desk. All receptionis
t
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
trained in the use of the equipment, so they are able to determine if s
o
m
e
o
n
e
i
s
u
s
i
n
g
any equipment improperly. They will also have voice communication to t
h
e
f
i
t
n
e
s
s
room.
Attached is a memo from Tom Eastman which outlines proposals for the var
i
o
u
s
v
i
d
e
o
systems. Community Services Staff recommend purchasing Todd Communicati
o
n
s
o
p
t
i
o
n
number two at a cost of $4,838. Funds will come from the 1988 Community
C
e
n
t
e
r
b
u
d
g
e
t
that have been earmarked for the Fitness Center Supervisor.
PART-TIME POSITIONS
Several weeks ago Natalie Swaggert, Human Services Director, met with
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Services Staff to review over 200 part-time and seasonal positions wi
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
Community Services Department. The purpose of the review was to limit t
h
e
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
part-time/year-round positions that operated between 20 and 30 hours pe
r
w
e
e
k
.
A
l
l
part-time positions must be less than 32 hours per week and any part-
t
i
m
e
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
that exceeds 20 hours per week must receive pro rated leave benefits
.
Three of the temporary positions fall within this category, they inclu
d
e
:
t
h
e
Officials Coordinator - (this position works under the Athletic Coordi
n
a
t
o
r
a
n
d
i
s
funded through fees from the adult sports), the Day Care Coordinator -
(
t
h
i
s
i
s
a
n
e
w
position that was initiated with the day care services program at the
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Center), and Water Safety Instructor position. The Community Center h
a
s
a
t
t
e
m
p
t
e
d
t
o
keep one Water Safety Instructor. The City has one instructor on a te
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
y
e
a
r
-
round basis in order to have at least one instructor available to teac
h
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
year. Most other Water Safety Instructors work on a seasonal basis a
n
d
a
r
e
n
o
t
available for morning classes held during the week, etc.
REQUEST FROM THE VOLUNTEER FIREMEN
The Volunteer Firemen have requested the City to consider providing the
m
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
fitness program that is offerd to the regular City employees. This pro
g
r
a
m
a
l
l
o
w
s
t
h
e
City employees limited free use of the Community Center and encourages
t
h
e
m
t
o
r
e
m
a
i
n
physically fit. The Community Services Staff recommend the Council ex
t
e
n
d
t
h
i
s
benefit to the Volunteer Firemen of our community.
BL:md
9,9 ICI
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
FROM: Tom Eastman, Supervisor of Operations
DATE: October 28, 1987
SUBJECT: Proposals for Fitness Video System
As you know staff has been obtaining proposals for
a
v
i
d
e
o
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
s
y
s
t
e
m
f
o
r
the Fitness Center at the Community Center.
Three companies have submitted proposals on this pr
o
j
e
c
t
.
O
n
e
e
a
c
h
f
r
o
m
A
l
p
h
a
Video & Audio and Blumberg Communications and two d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
s
f
r
o
m
T
b
d
d
Communication. The Todd company submitted two diffe
r
e
n
t
o
n
e
s
s
o
w
e
c
o
u
l
d
h
a
v
e
an option on the quality of the four cameras (note t
h
e
p
r
i
c
e
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
)
.
Todd Communication Inc. Option 1
(with new Vicon camera)
Option 2
(with Vidicon camera)
Alpha Video & Audio
Blumberg Communication Co.
$6,630.00
$4,838.00
$7,941.90
$4.840.32
Staff recommends purchasing Todd Communications Opti
o
n
2
.
T
h
i
s
s
y
s
t
e
m
w
i
l
l
h
a
v
e
a lower quality camera set up but we will only have o
n
e
T
V
s
c
r
e
e
n
w
h
i
c
h
w
i
l
l
take up less space in the office. The screen will be
a
b
l
e
t
o
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
a
l
l
4
cameras at the same time because it will be equipped
w
i
t
h
a
a
p
l
i
t
t
e
r
.
If you want more infromation or have questions let me
k
n
o
w
.
cc: Rick Bolinske
— 7 ,
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
LOGIS EMPLOYEE
CODE CLASSIFICATION
EMPLOYMENT DEFINITION
Overload/On Call Employment is based on individual's perso
n
a
l
schedule of availability and interest in assignment. Work assignments vary in work content, schedule and duration. Compensation is on an hourly basis.
Seasonal/Temporary
Intern
Employment which is normally for short dur
a
t
i
o
n
(120 days or less) and/or seasonal in nature. Positions are paid on an hourly basis, and may be either full-time or part-time.
Parttime-Unbenefited
(20-30 Hours/Week)
Employment is based on a predetermined reg
u
l
a
r
schedule and the work assignment is long te
r
m
i
n
nature. Hours worked are compensated
o
n
a
n
hourly basis and are consistently between
2
0
a
n
d
30 hours a week.
Parttime-Benefited
(32+ Hours/Week)
Employment is based on a predetermined, r
e
g
u
l
a
r
schedule and the work assignment is within a specific department and long-term in nature. Hours worked are compensated on an hourly
basis and are consistently between 32 and 40 hours a week.
Fulltime
Non-exempt
Employment is based on a regular schedule
o
f
4
0
or more hours per week and is consistent with
FLSA requirements and work definitions. Hours worked are compensated on an hourly basis.
Exempt Employment is based on a regular schedule
o
f
4
0
or more hours per week. Work is considered 'exempt' under the definitions and requirements of FLSA. Work is reported and compensated on a weekly basis.
Director
(Dept. Head)
Employment is based on a regular schedule
o
f
4
0
or more hours per week. Work is considered 'exempt' under the definitions
and requirements of FLSA. Work is reported and compensated on a weekly basis.
City Manager Employment is based on a regular schedule of 40
or more hours per week. Work is considered 'exempt' under the definitions and requirements
of FLSA. Work is reported and compensated on a weekly basis.
6-1-87
'
I
Mum- 1,1,96?
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
BENEFIT PROGRAM
EMPLOYEE CLAS
BENEFIT Overload/On-Call < 20 Hours/ Week Temporary Seasonal Part Time - (20 - 30 hours/week) Part Time (32+ hours/week) I Full Tire Non-exempt Director (Dept. Head) City Manager LEGISLATED BENEFITS Workman's CompensationXXXXXXXX
Overtime (FLSA) XXXXX
PERA XXXXXX
I— LEAVE BENEFITS Holidays PR PRXXXX
Std. PR PRXXXX Vacation
Exec.
Administrative Leave
Sick Time Accrual/Lc. PR PRXXXX
Short Term Disability X X x X
Long Term Disability XXXXX INSURANCE BENEFITS Medical XXXXX
Dental XXXXX
Basic XXXXX LIFE Sup hOK X X Sup/Dep X 0 X X x
Flexible Contrib. Acct. XXXXX IFRINGE BENEFITS Severance Bank XXXXX
Deferred Compensation XXXXX
Employee Assistance X X_X XX
Tuition Reimbursement X X X x X
Car Allowance/Car X X
Fitness Program 0 X --X X_ X
Raven Woods
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 50-87
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING ORDINANCE
#
7
8
-
2
5
,
A
N
D
,
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH,
A
M
O
N
G
O
T
H
E
R
THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached her
e
t
o
a
n
d
m
a
d
e
a part hereof.
Section 2. That Ordinance #78-25 be amended by adding the following:
"Section 2. The property shall be subject to the terms and
conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated November 17,
1987, entered into between the Cambridge Group, Inc., a Minnesota
corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, which agreement is hereby
made a part hereof."
Section 3. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Vi
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
"
a
n
d
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopte
d
i
n
t
h
e
i
r
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. •
Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of E
d
e
n
Prairie on October 20, 1987, and finally read and adopted and ordered pub
l
i
s
h
e
d
a
t
a
regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 17th day of Novemb
e
r
,
1
9
8
7
.
ATTEST:
Jahn D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the
day of
Exhibit A
Legal Description
Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Block 2, RAVEN RIDGE, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 78-25
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 135.
THE CITY COUNCIL CP THE CITY or EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLMS:
Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is a:ended as follo
w
s
:
That portion of Outlot V, Ddenvale 3rd Addition, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the following described
line:
Beginning at the northwesterly corner of Cutlot V and
lying on the easterly right of way line of Edenvale
Boulevard; thence South 70 Degrees 10 Minutes 03
Seconds East a distance of 422.64 feet; thence South 42 Degrees 30 Minutes 00 Seconds East a distance of 135.00
feet; thence South 09 Degrees 30 Minutes 00 Seconds West
a distance of 135.00 feet; thence South 18 Degrees 30
rdnutes 00 Seconds East, approximately 237.00 feet to the
South line of Outlot V and there terminating.
AISO
That part of Cutlot V, Edenvale 3rd Addition, lying easterly
of the Above described line,
which property shall be and hereby is removed from Rural zone and Shall be
included hereafter in the PM 6.5 and R1-13.5 zones respectively.
Section 2. The above described property shall be subject to the t
e
r
m
s
a
n
d
conditions of that certain rezoning agreement dated May 16 , 1978
entered into between Edenvale, Incorporated and the City of Eden
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
,
w
h
i
c
h
agreenent is hereby made a part hereof and shall further be subj
e
c
t
t
o
a
l
l
o
f
the ordinances, rules and regulations of the City relating to su
c
h
P
M
6
.
5
a
n
d
R1-13.5 zones.
Section 3. This ordinance becan. effective from and after its
p
a
s
s
a
g
e
and publication.
Raven Woods
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of
• 1987, by
The Cambridge Group, Inc., a Minnesota corpora
t
i
o
n
,
h
e
r
e
i
n
a
f
t
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
t
o
a
s
"Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a m
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
,
h
e
r
e
i
n
a
f
t
e
r
referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
i
n
the RM-6.5 District on 3.04 acres and Prelimnary P
l
a
t
o
f
3
.
0
4
a
c
r
e
s
i
n
t
o
1
6
l
o
t
s
a
n
d
two outlots for construction of 16 townhouse uni
t
s
,
s
i
t
u
a
t
e
d
i
n
H
e
n
n
e
p
i
n
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhi
b
i
t
A
,
a
t
t
a
c
h
e
d
h
e
r
e
t
o
a
n
d
m
a
d
e
a
part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred
t
o
a
s
"
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
;
"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City a
d
o
p
t
i
n
g
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
#
5
0
-
8
7
,
Developer covenants and agrees to construction upo
n
,
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
a
n
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
o
f
said property as follows:
1. Developer shall develop the property in conf
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
materials revised and dated October 13, 1987, rev
i
e
w
e
d
a
n
d
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
by the City Council on October 20, 1987, and at
t
a
c
h
e
d
h
e
r
e
t
o
a
s
Exhibit 8, subject to such changes and modifica
t
i
o
n
s
a
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
herein. Developer shall not develop, construct
u
p
o
n
,
o
r
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
the property in any other respect or manner than pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
h
e
r
e
i
n
.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance
a
n
d
o
b
s
e
r
v
a
n
c
e
b
y
Developer at such times and in such manner as pro
v
i
d
e
d
t
h
e
r
e
i
n
o
f
all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and condit
i
o
n
s
s
e
t
f
o
r
t
h
i
n
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof
.
3. Prior to issuance of any building permit u
p
o
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, a
n
d
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sani
t
a
r
y
s
e
w
e
r
,
w
a
t
e
r
,
storm sewer, including storm water run-off calcul
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
a
n
d
e
r
o
s
i
o
n
control for the property.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer s
h
a
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
,
o
r
cause to be constructed, those improvements li
s
t
e
d
a
b
o
v
e
i
n
s
a
i
d
plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit
C, attached hereto.
4. Developer agrees to notify the City and the Watershed District at
least 48 hours in advance of any grading, or tree removal, on the
property.
5. Prior to issuance of any permit for grading upon the property,
Developer agrees to implement erosion control measures and adequate
protective measures for areas to be preserved and areas where
grading is not to occur, and to receive City approval of said
measures. Said measures shall include, but not be limited to, the
following:
A. Prior to release of the grading permit, by the City, the
Developer must call for on-site inspection of the property
by the City, and defects in materials and workmanship in the
Implementation of said measures shall then be determined by
the City.
B. Any defects in materials or workmanship shall then be
corrected by the Developer, reinspected and approved by the
City prior to release the grading permit by the City.
Approval of materials and workmanship may be subject to such
conditions as the City may impose at the time of acceptance.
C. Developer agree to confine grading to that area of the
property within the construction limits as shown on Exhibit
B. Developer shall place snow fencing at the construction
limits within the wooded areas of the property prior to any
grading upon the property.
D. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, Developer shall
submit to the Director of Planning and receive the
Director's approval of a tree inventory of those trees
within the construction area and within 25 ft. outside of
the construction area, indicating the size, type, and
location of all trees twelve (12) inches in diameter, or
greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground level.
1) If any such trees are removed, damaged, or destroyed
outside of the construction area, Developer agrees
that prior to issuance of any building permit for
the property, Developer shall submit to the Director
of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of
a reforestation plan for all trees removed, damaged,
or destroyed outside of the construction area.
2) Developer further agrees that said trees shall be
replaced by similar tree species and that the trees
used for reforestation shall be no less than three
inches in diameter. The amount of trees to be
replaced shall be determined by the Director of
Planning, using a area inch per area inch basis,
according to the area of the circle created by a
cross sectional cut through the diameter of a tree as measured 4.5 feet above the ground.
E. If a tree reforestation plan is required, Developer agrees
that, prior to issuance of any building permit, Developer
will submit a bond, or letter of credit, guaranteeing
completion of all tree reforestation work as approved by the
Director of Planning. The amount of the bond, or letter of
credit, shall be 150% of the approved estimated cost of
Implementation of all tree replacement work and shall be in
such form and contain such other provisions and terms as may
be required by the Director of Planning.
1) Developer agrees to prepare and submit for approval
to the Director of Planning a written estimate of
the costs of the tree replacement work to be
completed.
2) Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer
shall implement, or cause to be implemented, those
improvements listed above in said plans, as approved
by the Director of Planning.
6. Prior to issuance of any building permit on the property, Devel
o
p
e
r
agrees to submit to the Director of Planning, and to obtain
t
h
e
Director's approval of the following:
A. Samples of materials for the exterior of the structures,
which shall include details regarding.color and texture.
B. Samples of the lighting standards to be used on the
property, which shall include details showing that the
lighting standards are no greater than 20 feet in height,
and designed with downcast, cut-off luminars to avoid glare
off the property.
7. Developer agrees to file on the property with Hennepin Coun
t
y
a
cross-access agreement to Edenvale Boulevard, through the exis
t
i
n
g
Raven Ridge townhome development. Developer shall provide proo
f
o
f
filing of said cross-access agreement to the City, prior to issua
n
c
e
of any occupancy permit for any structure on the property.
3,4 Y4
Raven Woods
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-306
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE 50-87 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 50-87 was adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 17th day of November,
1987;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 50-87, which is
attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said
text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said
ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 50-87 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on November 17, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Raven Woods
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 50-87
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING ORDINANCE #78-25, AND,
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER
THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
LaSumnar: This Ordinance allows amendment of the zoning of land
located east of Edenvale Boulevard, south of Raven Court, within the RM-6.5
District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit
A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
/s/John D. Frane
/s/Gary D. Peterson City Clerk
Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
, 1987.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
LARK IN, HOFFMAN, DALY & Li NDOREN, LTD.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1500 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER
7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH
BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431
TELEPHONE 16121 0353800
TELECOPIER n 5121 835 -5102
SHERRILL OMAN NL/RETICH
2000 PIPER JAFFRAT TOWER
222 SOUTH NINTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE n 812 , 338-6810
TELECOPIER 16121 338-1002
REPLY TO MINNEAPOLIS
November 10, 1987
Honorable Gary Peterson, Mayor
and Members of the City Council
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Re: Prairie Village Apartments Project
Dear Mayor Peterson and Members of the City Council:
Enclosed, for your consideration, is a proposed Resolution extending
the expiration date of the Inducement Resolution adopted by you on
December 2, 1986, pursuant to which, among other things, you gave your
preliminary approval to the issuance of $5,750,000 aggregate principal
amount of bonds to finance a portion of the costs of the Prairie
Village Apartments Project. On October 6, 1987, you adopted a
Resolution approving the substitution of a new developer for Prairie
Village Limited Partnership. The new developer is a limited
partnership to be formed, whose general partners will be Wayne C.
Chaney, J. Peter Jungbacker, Century Capital Group, Ltd., and
RRM, Inc. (the New Developer). In giving your consent to the approval
of the substitution of the New Developer, the expiration date of the
Inducement Resolution remained December 2, 1987.
We have been advised by Century Capital Group, Ltd. and The Chicago
Corporation, the proposed underwriter for the bonds, that if the bonds
were marketed today, the interest rate on the bonds would adversely
affect the economic feasibility of the Project. Accordingly, we have
been requested by the New Developer to ask you for an extension of the
Inducement Resolution to December 2, 1988.
I have discussed this extension request with Richard Nadeau, of the
Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development. This was
necessary because the Department issued a Certificate of Allocation
for this Project in December, 1986, which Certificate of Allocation
expires in December, 1987. Mr. Nadeau has advised me that, if the
City will extend the expiration date of its Inducement Resolution and
I
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
Honorable Gary Peterson, Mayor
November 10, 1987
Page 2
if he receives an opinion of bond counsel to the effect that such an
extension is permissible under the carryforward provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and will not result in a loss to the
state of that portion of its allocation, he will grant an extension to
the Certificate of Allocation. We have agreed to provide Mr. Nadeau
with such an opinion.
The New Developer and The Chicago Corporation believe that interest
rates on tax-exempt bonds will be lower in the reasonably near future.
It remains the intent of the New Developer to close on the sale of
these bonds prior to the end of the year, subject to interest rates.
Enclosed with this letter is a copy of a letter from Century Capital
Group, Ltd. regarding the extension. We respectfully request your
adoption of the enclosed Resolution approving the expiration date of
the Inducement Resolution and thank you for your consideration. We
continue to believe the Project is feasible and look forward to its
successful completion.
Sincerely,
Sherrill 0. Kuretich, for
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd.
SOK/psb
Enclosures
cc: Mr. John Frane, Finance Director
SOK:DD2s
CENTURY CAPITAL GROUP LID.
240 Algoma Blvd. • P.O. Box 2348 • Oshkosh, WI 54903
(414) 426-1404 • Telecopier (414) 235-2290
November 5, 1987 VIA TELECOPIER
AND HAND DELIVERED
City of Eden Prairie
Attention: Mr. John Frane
Finance Director
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
RE: $5,750,000 City of Eden Prairie, Multi-Family Housing Revenue Bonds
(Prairie Village Apartments) Series 1987
Dear Mr. Frane:
On December 2, 1986, the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
(the "City") adopted Resolution 86-295, pursuant to which, among othe
r
t
h
i
n
g
s
,
it gave its preliminary approval to the issuance of the above referenc
e
d
b
o
n
d
s
,
subject to the developer and the City agreeing to a loan agreement o
n
m
u
t
u
a
l
l
y
acceptable terms and conditions by December 2, 1987. A Certif
i
c
a
t
e
o
f
Allocation for the project was granted by the Minnesota Department of E
n
e
r
g
y
a
n
d
Economic Development on December 22, 1986, with an expiration date of
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2, 1987.
On October 6, 1987, the City adopted a resolution approving the substit
u
t
i
o
n
o
f
a new developer for the original developer, the new developer to be
a
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
partnership, whose general partners will be Wayne C. Chaney,
J
.
P
e
t
e
r
Jungbacker, Century Capital Group Ltd., and RRM Incorporated.
We are advised by The Chicago Corporation, the underwriter for the Bo
n
d
s
,
t
h
a
t
the interest rate on the Bonds, if they were marketed and sold at th
i
s
t
i
m
e
,
would be 8-1/4 to 8-1/2%. That cost of borrowing, significantly aff
e
c
t
s
t
h
e
economic feasibility of the Project.
We have been advised by bond counsel, Sherrill Kuretich, of Larkin,
H
o
f
f
m
a
n
,
Daly & Lindgren, Ltd., that the allocation for the Project grante
d
b
y
t
h
e
Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development can, under fed
e
r
a
l
t
a
x
law, be carried forward for another year.
Therefore, given the current environment, the new developer reques
t
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
date by which the City and the developer must agree to a loan ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
o
n
mutually acceptable terms and conditions pursuant to which the dev
e
l
o
p
e
r
w
i
l
l
agree to pay the City principal, premium, if any, and interest on the
B
o
n
d
s
,
a
n
d
the other instruments and proceedings relating to the Bonds and by which th
e
Bonds must be issued and sold, be extended beyond December 2, 1987, t
o
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2, 1988.
CENTURY CAPITAL GROUP LTD.
e fIJlaney,tflalrm
Mr. John Frane
City of Eden Prairie
Page 2
November 5, 1987
If you need any further information, do not hesitate to contact either us or
bond counsel.
Sincerely,
WCC/ek:CVI:JF
RESOLUTION NO. 87-3/'
Councilmember
introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE EXPIRATION DATE OF
INDUCEMENT RESOLUTION NO. 87-277 FOR THE ISSUANCE
OF REVENUE BONDS OR NOTES PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA
STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C, FOR THE PURPOSE OF
FINANCING A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota (the City), as follows:
Section 1. Recitals
1.01. On December 2, 1986, the City adopted Resolution 86-295,
pursuant to which, among other things, it gave its preliminary
approval to the issuance of bonds or notes in the approximate
aggregate face amount of Five Million Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand
Dollars ($5,750,000) (the Bonds), to finance a portion of the costs of
the Prairie Village Apartments Project (the Project), subject to the
City and Prairie Village Limited Partnership (the Original Developer)
agreeing to mutually acceptable terms and conditions of a loan
agreement by December 2, 1987.
1.02. A Certificate of Allocation for the Project was granted by
the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development on
December 22, 1986. The expiration date of such allocation is
December 2, 1987. A federal volume allocation carryforward was filed
on December 29, 1986.
1.03. On October 6, 1987, the City adopted Resolution No. 87-277
(the Inducement Resolution) pursuant to which, among other things, it
approved the conveyance of the Project by the Original Developer to a
limited partnership to be formed, whose general partners will be
Wayne C. Chaney, J. Peter Jungbacker, Century Capital Group, Ltd., and
RRM, Incorporated (collectively referred to as Developer).
1.04. The Inducement Resolution provides that all commitments of
the City expressed therein are subject to the condition that by
December 2, 1987, the City and the Developer shall have agreed to
mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement
pursuant to which the Developer will agree to pay to the City
principal, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds, and of the
other instruments and proceedings relating to the Bonds and their
issuance and sale. If the events set forth therein do not take place
within the time set forth, or any extension thereof, and the Bonds are
not sold within such time, the Inducement Resolution will expire and
be of no further effect.
•
1.05. The Developer and representatives of the Developer have
advised the City that, due to current economic conditions, the Bonds
could not be sold at interest rates which would permit the Project to
be economically feasible at this time. The Developer and its
representatives have further advised the City they believe that, if
the Inducement Resolution expiration date is extended, Bonds could be
sold during such extension period at rates that would make the Project
economically feasible.
1.06. The Developer has requested that the City approve the
extension of the expiration date of the Inducement Resolution to
December 2, 1988, and that all other terms and conditions of the
Inducement Resolution remain the same.
1.07. Representatives of the Developer have also advised the
City that the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development
will extend the expiration date of the Certificate of Allocation to
December 2, 1988, upon receipt of an opinion of Bond Counsel that such
an extension will not violate the carryforward provisions of Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 and upon receipt of a copy of a resolution
extending the expiration date of the Inducement Resolution.
Section 2. Approval and Authorization
2.01. It is hereby found and determined, based upon the
information presented to this Council by the Developer and its
representatives, that it would be in the best interests of the City to
extend the expiration date of the Inducement Resolution to December 2,
1988. Accordingly, all commitments of the City expressed in
Resolution 87-277 are subject to the condition that, by December 2,
1988, the City and the Developer shall have agreed to mutually
acceptable terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement pursuant to
which the Developer will agree to pay to the City principal, premium,
if any, and interest on the Bonds, and of the other instruments and
proceedings relating to the Bonds and their issuance and sale. If the
events set forth in the Inducement Resolution do not take place on or
before December 2, 1988, or any extension thereof, and the Bonds are
not sold within such time, Resolution No. 87-277 shall expire and be
of no further effect.
2.02. The Mayor and other officers, employees, and acents of the
City, including Bond Counsel, are hereby authorized to notify the
Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development of the
extension of the expiration date of the Inducement Resolution to
December 2, 1988, and to request an extension of the expiration date
of the Certificate of Allocation for the Project to December 2, 1988.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, this 17th day of November, 1987.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
SOK:DC8s
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services 1 41---
November 13, 1987
Change Order No. 1 for Eden Prairie Community Center Partial
Repairs
Attached is a November 11th letter from Wally Daniels, Project Manager for the
Community Center Repair Project, outlining the proposal for Change Order No.
1, which consists of requesting a second coat of epoxy paint on the natatorium
wall and approval to apply primer to areas of existing bare block.
As Mr. Daniels has noted, the report recommending the techniques for repairing
the Community Center included the recommendation of two coats of epoxy paint
on the interior wall of the natatorium; however, when the architect was
drafting the specifications they inadvertently specified one coat. Although
one coat would be an adequate vapor barrier by code, the architect recommends
two coats due to the extreme high humidity in the natatorium.
The spot priming of bare concrete block is required by the paint manufacturer.
During the removal process of the existing paint there are large areas where
the paint has been removed down to bare block.
The quotes submitted by the contractor appear to be in line with his quotes
for the original job and, therefore, the City staff recommend approval of
Change Order No. 1.
BL:mdd
1011 Mosnet Mall
MInneapolis. Minnesota 55403 2491
8121338.8741 FAX 61213313 4840
American Institute of Architects
National Society of
Professional Engineers
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Setter, Leach & Lindstrom Inc.
Architects Engineers Planners
November 11, 1987
Bob Lambert
Director of Community Services
Eden Prairie City Hall
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55343
RE: Eden Prairie community Center
Dear Mr. Lambert:
Enclosed please find Change Order No. 1 for the above project. This Change
Order is being submitted for your approval so that this work may be included
into the contract documents.
Change Order No. 1 consists of two items:
1. A second coat of epoxy paint on the natatorium wall.
2. Application of primer to areas where the existing paint in the natatorium
is so severely deteriorated bare block is exposed.
The interior surface of the exterior wall of the natatorium is being painted as
part of this repair project in order to provide a vapor barrier in the exterior
wall. One coat of epoxy paint over the existing wall was specified for this
purpose. Although it is technically possible one coat may be adequate as a
vapor barrier, two coats were intended to be specified to accomplish this
purpose. This, in fact, was noted in our previous report regarding the
condition of the construction and suggested repairs to the project. We strongly suggest that the second coat be applied as we feel it is necessary. We
also feel that the price submitted by the contractor is satisfactory.
Regarding Item 2, spot priming of the concrete block is required to ensure
adequate coverage of the epoxy finish coats. Additional primer is necessary as
deterioration of the existing paint surface has caused the existing primer to
lift from the existing block. Removal of the loose paint in the natatorium in
preparation for painting has made this problem particularly evident. The price
submitted by the contractor for this additional work appears reasonable.
ILl
Sincerel
Walter J.p6nielt"
Project Manager
jmm (p-6)
1848.002.04
Enclosure
1
Bob Lambert
Eden Paine City Hall
Whiter J. Daniels
November 11, 1987
Page -2-
If you have any questions, please do not
h
e
s
i
t
a
t
e
t
o
c
a
l
l
.
C. F. Ha g lin and Sons Co.
4005 West 65th Street
'Edina, MN 55435
CONTRACT FOR:
j CONTRACT DATE:
October 21, 1987
General Construction
*1641A1 65th reet ler
Fr, irz
i 5 6ukxecutive Drive
Address
Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677
BY
DATE
BY
DA
Address
Edina 5
CHANGE
ORDER
AM DOCUMENT G701
Distribution to:
OWNER
ARCHITECT
CONTRACTOR
FIELD
OTHER
PROJECT:
(name, address)
TO (Contractor)
r-
Partial Repairs to Eden Prairie
Community Center, Eden Prairie,
Minnesota
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1
INITIATION DATE: November 11, 1987
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 1848.002.04-1
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: •
PROVIDE LABOR AND/OR MATERIAL TO ACCOMPLISH CHANGES DESCRIBED ON PROPOSAL REQUE
S
T
A
S
FOLLOWS:
Proposal
Request
1
2
Remarks
See attached Proposal Re q uest
See attached Proposal Re q uest
Add
$ 9,954.00
2.342.00
TOTAL ADD FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 1: $12,296.00
Attachments:
Proposal Re q uest No. 1 dated October 27, 1987
Proposal Re q uest No. 2 dated November 3, 1987
Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architect.
Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, Including any adjustment in t
h
e
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
S
u
m
o
r
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
T
i
m
e
.
The original (Contract Sum) ((earenteed4,47sitnern-C-osti was $ 276,000.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ 0.00 The (Contract Sum) (Gueranteerl-MasennenrC-ost)-prior to this Change Order was
$ 276,000.00 The (Contract Sum) Kisitrtmered-MaximtmrEost) will be (increased) (decteirsedr(tznehmed) by this Change Order $ 12,296.00 The new (Contract Sum) (Cuaklutoed4.4a.ximum -C-04) including this Change Order will be $ 288,296.00 The Contract Time will be (in‘ce.16erikdo.c.reased) (unchanged) by ) Days. The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is unchan g ed.
Authorized:
City of Eden Prairie sett r. Leach & Lindstrom, Inc. C. F. Ha g lin and Sons Co.
t iti Vcollelk.all _.ress
n :1111111111L 540 !
PINNEMEtt
DATE 11 -12 781
MA DOCUMENT tot • CHANGE ORDER • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA. • 0 1978 AMERICAN MERICAN IN TITUTE Of ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D.C. :CMG G701 — 1978
ayne E. Brown
ecretary-Treasurer
S"-)
Sandra L. Brown
Wayne L. Brown
1612'94033W
Bluestem Hills
Brown Land Company
10200 Wild Duck Pass*F.den Prairie, Minnesota' 55344
David W. Brown
(612)434•0338
November 4, 1987
Mayor and City Council
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Re: Bluestem Hills 4th Addition
Twiss Property
Dear Mayor and City Council:
With reference to the subject property, we would like to
withdraw from the November 17, 1987 agenda.
We will return in the future when we are able to present
more information or a revised plan.
Sincerely,
BROWN LAND COMPANY OP EDEN PRAIRIE
WEB/ck
cc:Mr. Mike Franzen - Senior Planner
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #87-307
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF STARRWOOD FOR
CARDARELLE AND ASSOCIATES
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Starrwood for Cardarelle and Associates, dated
September 25, 1987, consisting of 29.19 acres into 42 single family lots, two
outlots, and road right-of-way, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is
found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and
Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 1st day of December, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
JOhn D. Frane, City Clerk
CITY OFFICES / 7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE / EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55340499 I
T
E
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
(
6
1
2
)
9
3
7
.
2
2
6
2
October 23, 1987
Mr. Frank Cardarelle
Cardarelle & Associates, Inc.
8110 Eden Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Subject: Starwood Subdivision
Dear Frank:
Pursuant to our meeting on October 20th, the f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
i
s
m
y
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
t
o
your concerns.
Sewer Hook-up: The Metro Waste Control Commi
s
s
i
o
n
w
i
l
l
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
w
h
e
n
connecti3ni—EiT5i made to their Interceptor sewer pipe
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
y
e
t
t
o
b
e
constructed. It seems reasonable to assume th
a
t
w
h
e
n
t
h
e
p
i
p
e
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
past the point where your connection will be m
a
d
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
y
w
i
l
l
a
l
l
o
w
s
u
c
h
connection even though the balance of the pipe
u
p
s
t
r
e
a
m
i
s
n
o
t
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
.
T
h
e
City Engineering staff will determine when the
l
a
t
e
r
a
l
s
e
w
e
r
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
y
o
u
w
i
l
l
be building are ready for individual sewer hoo
k
-
u
p
s
.
Feasibility Report For Riverview Road and Mitc
h
e
l
l
R
o
a
d
:
T
h
e
C
i
t
y
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
has been directed to VElude the ResearcE -1oiiilii5RF-71T the Feasibility report already initiated for Mitchell Road. At t
h
i
s
t
i
m
e
i
t
i
s
n
o
t
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
t
o
say exactly when this Feasibility report will be
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
,
b
u
t
probably not until February or March of next
y
e
a
r
.
I
t
i
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
t
o
e
x
p
e
c
t
completion of the base course on the roadway
s
b
y
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
/
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
o
f
1
9
8
8
.
This project will involve substantial cost t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
n
d
w
e
h
a
v
e
n
o
t
y
e
t
identified a funding source. Occupancy of homes
i
n
y
o
u
s
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
w
i
l
l
b
e
t
i
e
d
to having proper road access, bitumious base o
r
a
v
e
r
y
s
t
a
b
l
e
g
r
a
v
e
l
b
a
s
e
w
i
l
l
be required prior to occupancy of homes.
Developer Builds Road In Lieu of Assessment
s
:
I
t
i
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
Developer to bUTTFE 6117Wiah iiition of Research Road over a portion of the frontage in lieu of Special Assessments un
d
e
r
a
C
i
t
y
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
I
t
s
e
e
m
s
,
however, that it would be much better to have
a
s
i
n
g
l
e
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
e
n
t
i
r
e
project rather than splitting it up. You sho
u
l
d
w
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
G
e
n
e
D
i
e
t
z
i
f
y
o
u
wish to pursue this idea.
Outlot Dedication: The Planning staff indicate
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
p
o
n
d
i
n
O
u
t
l
o
t
B
is designated by the DNR as public waters, an
d
t
h
e
r
e
f
o
r
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
S
h
o
r
e
l
i
n
e
Ordinance applies. This means that the 150 fo
o
t
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
i
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
to plat the lots adjacent to these public wate
r
s
.
D
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
O
u
t
l
o
t
t
o
the City is at your option.
I trust that the foregoing addresses the concer
n
s
w
e
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
.
f r Sinceref[y)
((\ Ni
Carl J.
t
Ju.lie
City Manag6
CJ:pb
cc: Gene Dietz
Chrie I. )
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
• THRU:
Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM:
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services 11(1•"'
DATE:
October 29, 1987
SUBJECT: Supplementary Staff Report to the October 23, 1987 Planning Staff
Report on Starrwood
PEDESTRIAN SYSTEMS
A pedestrian connection from Sycamore Court, south to the bike trail within
Staring Lake Park, along Research Road will provide a significant shortcut
f
o
r
residents to the north and northeast to Staring Lake Park. The Community
Services Staff recommend requiring the developer to construct an 8' wide
bituminous pathway, to City standards, from Sycamore Court through Outlot 8
t
o
the sidewalk around the outside perimeter of Flesher Circle.
The Community Services Staff is concerned over the ability of the develo
p
e
r
t
o
design a safe trail relating to grades and turning radiuses within the na
r
r
o
w
portion of Outlot B, north of Lot 10. Staff is always concerned when
recommending the construction of a bicycle trail between lots, and a 20'
Outlot is the absolute minimum width that should be allowed for a trail
between lots, and it is questionable if that width is satisfactory if the
r
e
i
s
a steep slope where additional grading is required.
If a trail cannot be constructed to City specifications within that outlo
t
,
staff would recommend one of the following three alternatives:
1. Widen the outlot, which may require a reconfiguration of several lots.
2. Eliminate Lot 10.
3. Eliminate the trail.
BL:md
STAFF REPORT
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: October 23, 1987
PROJECT: Starrwood
LOCATION: North of Research Road, east of Mitchell Road, southeast of McCoy
Lake
APPLICANT: Cardarelle & Associates/Lyman Lumber
FEE OWNER: Leonard J. Flesher, Jr.
REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 22.4 acres.
2. Preliminary Plat of 29.19 acres into 43 single family lots,
2 outlots, and road right-of-way.
Background
This site is currently designated on
the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide
Plan for development as Low Density
Residential land uses. The adjacent
properties to the north, east, and
west, are also guided for Low
Density Residential and the property
to the south adjacent Staring Lake
is guided for Public Open Space.
Specific land uses in this area
include Ridgewood West, zoned R1-
13.5 to the north and east, Staring
Lake Park and Research Road to the
south, and large lot single family
development, McCoy Lake, and
Mitchell Road to the west.
The proponent is requesting a zoning
district change from Rural to R1-
13.5 and a preliminary plat of
approximately 29.19 acres into 43
. lots and 2 outlots.
Starrwood 2 October 23, 1987
Site Plan/Preliminary Plat
This site contains 29.19 acres, of which, 6.76 acres are proposed to be
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
t
o
the City as Outlot B. Outlot A, containing approximately 0.03 ac
r
e
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
combined with the property to the south when platted. A total of appro
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
2
2
.
4
acres remain for development. There are 43 lots proposed within the su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
a
t
a gross density of 1.47 units per acre. Lot sizes range from a maxi
m
u
m
o
f
4
7
,
6
0
7
square feet to a minimum of 13,502 square feet with an average
l
o
t
s
i
z
e
o
f
approximately 18,399 square feet. All of the lots meet the minimum re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
the R1-13.5 zoning district.
This property is located within Airport Safety Zone C. Guidelines for
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
within Airport Safety Zone C state that "No use shall be made of any l
a
n
d
i
n
a
n
y
o
f
the safety zones which creates or causes interference with the operati
o
n
o
f
r
a
d
i
o
o
r
electronic communications between the airport and aircraft, makes it
d
i
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
f
o
r
pilots to distinguish between airport lights and other lights, result
s
i
n
g
l
a
r
e
i
n
the eyes of pilots using the airport, impair visibility in the vic
i
n
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
airport, or otherwise endangers the landing, taking off, or man
e
u
v
e
r
i
n
g
o
f
aircraft". Single family residential development is not expected to v
i
o
l
a
t
e
a
n
y
o
f
the preceeding guidelines.
Shoreland Ordinance
Because Staring Lake and McCoy Lake have been classified as Recreationa
l
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Waters, development within 1,000 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark
i
s
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
Shoreland regulations. The subdivision has been designed so that no l
o
t
s
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
classified as abutting, which are defined as lots abutting the Ordina
r
y
H
i
g
h
W
a
t
e
r
Mark or within 150 feet thereof. Because of this, the following requir
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
Shoreland Ordinance apply:
1. The building height shall not exceed 30 feet.
2. The impervious surface shall not exceed 30% of the total lot area.
3. Structure shall be placed at an elevation 7 feet above the 100-year fl
o
o
d
elevation.
All of the lots meet the minimum requirements of the Shoreland Ordinanc
e
.
Access
Access to this site is provided from three different locations. T
o
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
,
access would be from the extension of Sycamore Court. The Sycamo
r
e
C
o
u
r
t
r
o
a
d
extension would terminate in a cul-de-sac and service five lots.
Access to the western portion of the site would be by an addition
a
l
c
u
l
-
d
e
-
s
a
c
extending from Mitchell Road and servicing ten single family lots. Di
r
e
c
t
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
Mitchell Road is provided by a roadway easement on the Guille p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
T
h
i
s
easement shall be recorded concurrent with the final plat.
Although it would be physically possible to extend the cul-de-sac to R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
R
o
a
d
,
there are a number of reasons why it is not recommended:
1. With the extension, there would be four access points onto Research
R
o
a
d
within 1,400 feet and three access points within 750 feet which
i
s
undesirable from a traffic standpoint.
Starrwood 3 October 23, 1987
2. With the upgrading of Mitchell and Research Road, the extension of Starrwood
Circle through Research Road may provide a shortcut between the two major
streets and again be considered undesirable.
The majority of this site would be accessed by a loop road off Research Road. A
total of 29 lots would be served by the extension of Flesher Circle. In order for
Flesher Circle to meet City standards, the bubble serving Lots 4, 5, and 6, Block 2,
must be redesigned which would require the tapering of the bubble to an eyebrow
shape. In addition, the proposed Jenkins Addition, located to the east of the
subject property, would also be served by the extension of the most easterly access
point. The proponent is dedicating the necessary right-of-way to allow this road
extension to be centered on the property line between this project and the Jenkins
project.
Primary access to this site is from Research Road and Mitchell Road which are
currently unimproved. The proponent has indicated that they will be petitioning
along with other property owners in the area, for the upgrading of both Research
Road and Mitchell Road. A special assessment agreement will be required for the
construction of these roadways. At a minimum, depending upon the outcome of the
feasibility reports, Research Road should be constructed concurrent with the
development of this project.
Grading/Tree Replacement
Due to the location of this property adjacent to Staring Lake and McCoy Lake, this
site contains a significant amount of natural site characteristics including steep
slopes and wooded areas. A high point elevation of 866 is adjacent Sycamore Court
along the north property line and 876 contour elevation along the eastern property
line behind the existing house. The site slopes primarily in a southerly and
westerly direction towards Staring Lake and McCoy Lake. Natural grades on-site
exceed 2/1 in the sloped areas. Low points on the site exist at the 820 contour
elevation within Outlot B adjacent McCoy Lake and the 824 contour elevation along
the south property line adjacent Research Road. The majority of the site, in order
to provide building pads and road locations, is being graded." There are some
exceptions which would include the slopes along the eastern property line and the
hill along the northern property line. Maximum cut would be approximately 12 feet
located along Starrwood Circle with some filling occuring in various areas
throughout the site. Because of the grade difference between the proposed street
and the existing house (30 feet) located on Lot 5, Block 2, a series of retaining
walls are being proposed to allow for the construction of the driveway. Elevations
on the driveway range from 868 adjacent the house to 840 adjacent the curb line.
Maximum slope on the driveway shall not exceed 12%. The maximum height of the
retaining wall is approximatley 10 feet. Any retaining wall over 4 feet in height
requires a building permit. Detailed retaining wall plans shall be submitted and
the walls constructed concurrent with site grading.
Based upon the plans dated October 20, 1987, there are a total of 1,139 caliper
inches of signficant trees on the site. Of these trees, 421 caliper inches of
significant trees are being removed. The tree replacement policy would require a
total of 297 caliper inches of plant material be replaced on-site. The proponent
has indicated that there are a number of evergreen trees on the property which may
be transplanted. Suitable trees may be transplanted subject to inspection by the
City Forester. A tree replacement plan indicating the replacement of 297 caliper
inches shall be submitted prior to City Council review.
Starrwood 4 October 23, 1987
Utilities
Water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer services are available to this site. Water
service is to be provided by extensions from a six-inch water line within Sycamore
Court, a 12-inch water line within Research Road, and a 20-inch water line through
Mitchell Road. Sanitary sewer is proposed to be serviced from the proposed Red Rock
interceptor to be constructed within Research Road. It is not expected that sewer
service will be available until Fall of 1988.
Due to the location of this project between McCoy Lake and Staring Lake, this would
be the first section of the Chain-Of-Lakes project which is being proposed by the
Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek-Watershed District as petitioned by the City of Eden
Prairie. In order to provide the necessary storage within McCoy Lake, an earth
embankment at the outlet of McCoy Lake is being constructed. McCoy Lake will then
outlet south into Staring Lake through a 27-inch storm sewer pipe constructed within
Flesher Circle.
The remainder of the project is serviced by a series of catch basins designed
throughout the street system with connection made to the major storm sewer between
McCoy Lake and Staring Lake. Proposed plans are subject to review by the City
Engineering Department and the Watershed District.
Pedestrian Systems
In order to provide access to the Staring Lake park system from properties to the
north, an 8-foot bituminous trail has been designed to extend from Sycamore Court
through Outlot B and Flesher Circle to Research Road. These connections will be
made through a minimum of 20-foot outlots through the project with a connection to a
loop sidewalk system along the outer edge of Flesher Circle. As part of the
feasibility report for Research Road, the plan should take into consideration the
appropriate street crossings from this subdivision to the trail system around
Staring Lake.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the Starrwood Addition project based upon plans
dated October 18, 1987, and subject to the Staff Report dated October 23, 1987, and
subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Provide a tree replacement plan depicting 297 caliper inches of
plant material.
B. Provide petitions for the upgrading of Research Road and Mitchell
Road.
C. Revise the plans to reflect the appropriate design for the bubble
serving Lots 4, 5, and 6, Block 2.
2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water and erosion control plans for review by
the Watershed District.
Starrwood 5 October 23, 1987
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off, utility, and erosion control
plans for the City Engineer.
3. Prior to Grading permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of any grading. Stake all grading with a snow fence. Any trees
lost outside the limits shall be replaced on an area inch per area
inch basis.
B. Stake the construction limits with erosion control fencing.
C. Submit detailed retaining wall plans.' All retaining walls shall be
constructed concurrent with grading.
4. Concurrent with Final Plat, proponent may dedicate Outlot B to the City for
conservation purposes, or retain in a Homeowners' Association, outlot with a
trail easement to the City.
5. Concurrent with final plat, proponent shall record the roadway easement for
the construction of Starrwood Circle.
6. Prior to the release of the final plat, the proponent shall enter into a
special assessment agreement with the City of Eden Prairie for the upgrading
of Research Road and Mitchell Road.
Eden Prairie Planning Commission - October 26, 1987 - Page Seven .
D. STARRWOOD, Cardarelle & Associates. Request for Zoning
District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 22.4 acres,
Preliminary Platting of 29.19 acres into 43 single family
lots, 2 outlots, and road right-of-way. Location: North of
Research Road, east of Mitchell Road, southeast of McCoy
Lake. A public hearing.
Frank Cardarelle, proponent representative, indicated on plat the
43 lots proposed within the subdivision at a gross density of 1.47
units per acre on the north side of Starring Lake containing 29.19
acres of rolling land. Lot sizes range from a maximum of 47,607
to a minimum of 13,502 square feet with an average lot size of
18,399 square feet, of which all meet the minimum requirements of
the R1-13.5 Zoning District.
Proponent further explained that hard surface roads and curbs have
been petitioned. They have a letter from Merle Gamm supporting
this. Outlot A, containing seven (7) acres will either be dedicated
to the City or the Homeowners' Association.
Uram indicated that this site would be accessed by a loop road off
Research Road. A total of 29 lots would be served by the
extension of Flesher Circle. In order for Flesher Circle to meet
City standards, the bubble serving Lots 4, 5, and 6, Block 2, will
be redesigned requiring the tapering of the bubble to an eyebrow
shape. Access to western portion of the site would be by an
additional cul-de-sac extending from Mitchell Road and serving ten
single family lots. Direct access to Mitchell Road is provided
by a roadway easement on the Guille property. This easement shall
be recorded concurrent with the final plat.
Uram further stated the tree replacement policy would require a
total of 297 caliper inches of plant material be replaced on the
site. The proponent indicated there are a number of evergreen
trees on the property which may be transplanted. Suitable trees
may be transplanted subject to inspection by the City Forester.
Uram commented that due to the location of this project between
McCoy Lake and Starring Lake, this will be the first section of
the Chain-of-Lakes project which is being proposed by the Riley-
Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District as petitioned by the
City of Eden Prairie.
Uram pointed out that the Staff recommends the following:
1. Concurrent with final plat, proponent may dedicate Outlot B
to the City for conservation purposes or retain in a Homeowners'
Association, outlot with a trail easement to the City.
Eden Prairie Planning Commission October 26, 1987 - Page Eight
2. Concurrent with final plat, proponent shall record the roadway
easement for the construction of Starrwood Circle.
3. Prior to the release of the final plat, the proponent shall
enter into a special assessment agreement with the City of Eden
Prairie for the upgrading of Research Road and Mitchell Road.
Acting Chairman Hallett asked if anyone in the audience would like
to speak.
Hallett asked Staff if the trail around McCoy Lake will be built
before the homeowners can say no to it? Uram responded that it
is not possible at this time, however, this matter will go to Parks
and Recreation Commission.
Arthur B. Weeks, 8789 Sycamore Court, had a question regarding t
h
e
type of housing planned for the area as to what price range the
development is talking. Proponent advised they anticipate homes
in the range of $200,000 to $300,000.
Weeks also inquired as to the cut off from Sycamore and Research
Road with type of houses presently there. Proponent said
basically a price range has been set in that area, and additiona
l
homes will be comparable.
No further questions were asked by audience and Acting Chairman
Hallett requested a motion to close public hearing.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Fell to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried 5-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Fell to recommend to the
City Council approval of the request of Cardarelle & Associates
for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 for 22.4
acres, to be known as Starrwood, based on revised plans dated
October 19, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff
Report dated October 23, 1987, subject to the Staff Report of
October 23, 1987 .
Motion carried 5-0-0
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Bye and Seconded by Fell to recommend to the
City Council approval of the request of Cardarelle & Associates
for Preliminary Plat of 29.19 acres into 43 single family lots,
two lots, and road right-of-way, to be known as Starrwood, based
on revised plans dated October 19, 1987, subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 23, 1987.
Motion carried 5-0-0
/
Eden Prairie Planning Commissi
o
n
-
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
6
,
1
9
8
7
- Page Nine V. OLD BUSINESS
Hallett inquired of Staff about
t
h
e
parking lot at Wilson Learning Center that is totally visible
v
i
o
l
a
t
i
n
g
C
i
t
y
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
E
a
g
e
r
responded that trees planted hav
e
p
r
o
v
e
n
i
n
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
r
e
w
a
s
not enough room to allow harming
.
C
i
t
y
S
t
a
f
f
i
s
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
reviewing the situation.
Eager added that the loading doc
k
a
t
t
h
a
t
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
b
e
i
n
g
screened a new way with masonry a
n
d
f
e
n
c
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
w
e
r
e
very satisfactory. If Commission
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
a
r
e
i
n
t
h
e
v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
t
h
e
y
should observe this.
Dodge inquired to Staff of letter
m
e
n
t
i
o
n
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
8
meeting that was to be sent to
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
w
h
i
c
h
w
a
s
n
e
v
e
r
received. Hallett added a recom
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
w
a
s
m
a
d
e
t
h
a
t
y
o
u
s
e
n
d
a
copy to members.
Eager responded this was an ove
r
s
i
g
h
t
a
n
d
t
h
e
l
e
t
t
e
r
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
forwarded to all members.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
Dodge requested that Staff pleas
e
n
o
t
i
f
y
b
y
p
h
o
n
e
o
r
s
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
letter, of any meetings beside r
e
g
u
l
a
r
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
the October 14th meeting.
Eager responded that this will b
e
f
o
r
w
a
r
d
e
d
t
o
S
t
a
f
f
a
n
d
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e will be acted upon.
VI/. PLANNER'S REPORT
Eager reported on strategic pla
n
n
i
n
g
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
.
H
e
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
hired to discover policy and ho
w
e
v
e
r
y
t
h
i
n
g
w
o
r
k
s
.
H
e
w
i
l
l
b
e
here for two months and City ho
p
e
s
t
o
o
b
t
a
i
n
b
e
t
t
e
r
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
-
tion, and goal setting with Cou
n
c
i
l
i
n
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
,
n
o
t
j
u
s
t
mentioning the goals. To obtain
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
,
g
o
a
l
s
a
n
d
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
,
the strategic plan will aid us i
n
u
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
d
y
n
a
m
i
c
s
.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 9:46 PM. M
o
t
i
o
n
w
a
s
m
a
d
e
b
y
D
o
d
g
e
,
seconded by Fell.
Motion carried 5-0-0
Respectfully submitted,
Sue Masear Anderson
947
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #87-308
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BLUFFS EAST 5TH FOR
HUSTAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Bluffs East 5th for Hustad Development Cor
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
,
dated September 25, 1987, consisting of 30.1 acres into 34 single family
l
o
t
s
,
3
outlots, and road right-of-way, a copy of which is on file at the City
H
a
l
l
,
i
s
found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zo
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 1st day of December, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Hustad
DEVELOPMENT
November 13, 1987
City Council
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
RE: Notice of Withdrawal from Agenda November 17, 1987
Meeting
Dear City Council,
Unfortunately, I was not represented at the appropriate Park
and Recreation Commission meeting discussing important
issues relating to the development of the second phase of
the Creek Knolls project. I think it best to delay bringing
the project to the council until I have an opportunity to
address these matters with the park and recreation
commission. We are scheduled to be on their agenda December
Fourth. We would appreciate a spot on the City Council
agenda as soon thereafter as possible.
Very sincerely,
llace H. Hustad, Sr.
President
Hustad Development Corporation
cc: Kate Karnes, Planning Department
Donald Uram, Planning Department
7460 Market Place Drive • Eden Prairie, MN 55344 • 941-4383 2q(AA
AREA LOCATION MAP
STAFF REPORT
Planning Commission
Planning Staff
October 23, 1987
Bluffs East 5th Addition
Southwest of Franlo Road, north of Purgatory Creek
Hustad Development Corporation
Wallace Hustad
1. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 17.7 acres.
2. Preliminary Plat of 30.1 acres into 34 single family lots,
and three outlots.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
FEE OWNER:
REOUEST:
Background
The Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts
this site as Low Density Res-
idential. The surrounding land area
is guided Low Density Residential to
the north, east, and west, and
Public Open Space to the south along
Purgatory Creek. This 17.7-acre
site is part of the 1986 Bluff
Country PUD totalling 305 res-
idential units on 186 acres of land
at an overall density of 2.1
dwelling units per acre. In
addition, approximately 50 acres are
to be set aside as a preservation
area. The entire 17.7-acre site is
currently zoned Rural.
Preliminary Plat
The preliminary plat depicts the
subdivision of 30.1 gross acres into
34 single family lots and three
outlots at a net density of 1.9
dwelling units per acre. Outlot C,
containing approximately 16 acres,
will remain unzoned, for development
in the future. The Guide Plan would
Bluffs Fast 5th Addition 2 October 23, 1987
allow up to 2.5 units per acre. Lot sizes range from 14,02
0
t
o
3
3
,
6
6
0
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
with an average of 18,937 square feet. All of the l
o
t
s
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
requirements of the R1-13.5 zoning district with the excepti
o
n
o
f
L
o
t
7
a
n
d
L
o
t
1
3
,
Block I, which should be revised to meet the minimum street f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
55 and 85 feet, respectively. Outlot B is proposed as a si
g
n
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
b
e
maintained by the Homeowners' Association.
Access
The 1986 Bluff Country PUD was approved with requirements for a loop road connection between Meade Lane and Franlo Road, and paving of existing B
l
u
f
f
R
o
a
d
f
r
o
m
P
h
a
s
e
I
to County Road #18. Meade Lane is proposed to connect to Fr
a
n
l
o
R
o
a
d
a
l
o
n
g
A
n
t
l
e
r
Ridge Drive. The bubble serving Lots 4, 5, and 6, Block 2, s
o
u
t
h
o
f
M
e
a
d
e
L
a
n
e
m
u
s
t
be designed to City standards which would require the 'taper
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
b
u
b
b
l
e
t
o
a
n
eyebrow shape.
In accordance with the original Bluff Country PUD Develop
e
r
'
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
,
d
a
t
e
d
August 19, 1986, the proponent agreed to construct a tem
p
o
r
a
r
y
t
w
o
-
i
n
c
h
t
h
i
c
k
bituminous surface for Bluff Road concurrent with the Ph
a
s
e
I
I
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
b
e
completed no later than Spring of 1988. A temporary bitu
m
i
n
o
u
s
r
o
a
d
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
f
o
r
Bluff Road will be installed with the construction of the
B
l
u
f
f
'
s
E
a
s
t
5
t
h
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
in the Spring of 1988. The paving of Bluff Road is propos
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
a
n
e
w
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
to service the Creek Knolls Addition to the east with a co
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
m
a
d
e
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
Bluff Road as dedicated in Bluff's East 4th Addition. Cur
r
e
n
t
l
y
,
t
h
e
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
for the realignment of Bluff Road is depicted as an easem
e
n
t
b
u
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
to the City when the property is platted. This arrangeme
n
t
i
s
a
c
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
t
o
t
h
e
Engineering Department.
The upgrading of Bluff Road will generate more through tra
f
f
i
c
f
r
o
m
F
r
a
n
l
o
R
o
a
d
t
o
County Road #18. Due to the increase in traffic, concern h
a
s
b
e
e
n
r
a
i
s
e
d
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
the intersection of Bluff Road and County Road #18. In re
s
p
o
n
s
e
t
o
t
h
a
t
,
H
e
n
n
e
p
i
n
County is requiring that the developer construct a by-pas
s
l
a
n
e
a
n
d
a
r
i
g
h
t
t
u
r
n
lane on County Road #18 as part of the improvements
t
o
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
B
l
u
f
f
Road/County Road #I8 intersection (see Attachment A). The
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
c
o
n
t
a
c
t
Hennepin County regarding intersection improvement details.
Grading
The upper portions of this site are relatively level and sit
e
s
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
P
u
r
g
a
t
o
r
y
Creek are very steep. None of the lots are in the Purgatory
C
r
e
e
k
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
n
c
y
a
r
e
a
;
however, some portions of the lots are within the transition
a
r
e
a
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
a
"
b
u
i
l
d
-
with-care" zone. The upper portions of two major ravine
s
a
r
e
b
e
i
n
g
f
i
l
l
e
d
t
o
accommodate building pads. The grading proposed is consisten
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
m
a
s
s
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
plan of the approved POD. Fill in the upper portions of the
r
a
v
i
n
e
w
i
l
l
n
o
t
r
e
s
u
l
t
in the loss of any significant trees of twelve inches o
r
g
r
e
a
t
e
r
i
n
s
i
z
e
.
T
h
e
amount of fill proposed is minimal compared with the total l
e
n
g
t
h
o
f
t
h
e
r
a
v
i
n
e
.
N
o
stormwater run-off is proposed to drain into either ravi
n
e
.
T
h
e
r
e
g
r
a
d
e
d
a
r
e
a
s
along the ravine are proposed at 2/1 slopes. To help minimi
z
e
e
r
o
s
i
o
n
,
t
h
e
s
l
o
p
e
s
should be decreased to 2.5/1 and a fiber blanket with a deep
s
e
e
d
m
i
x
t
u
r
e
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
utilized to help stabilize the slopes after regrading. A re
v
i
s
e
d
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
m
u
s
t
be submitted which reflect the decreased slopes.
The developer is proposing to grade only a portion of t
h
e
l
o
t
s
p
r
i
m
a
r
i
l
y
o
n
t
h
e
north side of Antlers Ridge Drive and Meade Lane. The lo
t
s
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
P
u
r
g
a
t
o
r
y
Bluffs East 5th Addition 3 October 23, 1987
Creek are proposed to be graded on a lot by lot basis at the time of building permit
issuance. Our experience with lot by lot grading is that it does not work because
each owner wants to grade their lot different and overall drainage plans are
difficult to implement. For these reasons, all lots must be graded concurrent with
street construction. The proponent must submit a revised grading plan which shows
the grading of Lots 9 - 13, Block 1.
Tree Replacement
There are 348 caliper inches of significant trees on-site located primarily on the
lots adjacent to Purgatory Creek. Of this total, 225 inches would be lost due to
construction or a 60% tree loss. The tree replacement policy would require the
replacement of 345 caliper inches. Prior to City Council review, the proponent
should provide a tree replacement plan for 345 inches.
Pedestrian Systems
As part of the overall pedestrian system plan for Eden Prairie, there is a need for
a sidewalk along the south side of Meade Lane and Antlers Ridge Drive. Outlot A as
depicted on the preliminary plat is to be set aside for access to a scenic overlook
of Purgatory Creek from a high point to the southwest of the project. The proponent
has indicated that Outlots A, B and C, Bluff's East 4th Addition, will be gifted to
the City with the development of the adjacent property. The leveloper will be
required, concurrent with road construction, to build a five-foot wide concrete
sidewalk within the Outlot as depicted on Sheet 2, PUD Concept Plan and Phasing
Plan. All sidewalks within this project are to be constructed concurrent with
street construction within City right-of-way.
Utilities
Sanitary sewer and water service is available to this site by connections made to an
existing 6" water line and 8" sewer line located with Meade Lane and Antlers Ridge
Drive.
Storm water run-off is proposed to drain ultimately into Purgatory Creek through a
series of catch basins and holding ponds designed for the entire Bluff Country PUD.
Specific issues and recommendations regarding the Bluffs East 5th Addition storm
water management proposal are addressed in a memo from Alan Gray, City Engineer,
dated October 22, 1987 (see Attachment B).
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Staff would recommend approval of the request for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5
and Preliminary Plat of 30.1 acres into 34 single family lots, and three outlots,
based on plans dated September 25, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff
Report dated October 23, 1987, and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to City Council review, proponent shall:
A. Revise the preliminary plat to depict the minimum street frontages
for Lot 7 and Lot 13, Block 2.
B. Submit a tree replacement plan for 345 caliper inches.
Bluffs East 5th Addition 4 October 23, 1987
C. Revise the grading plan to show grading on Lots 9-13 adjacent to
Purgatory Creek.
D. Five-foot wide concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along the
south side of Meade Lane and Antlers Ridge Drive and within Outlot A
as approved by the Director of Community Services.
E. Revise the grading plan adjacent to Purgatory Creek from 2/1 slopes
to 2.5/1 slopes with proper erosion control.
F. Revise the grading plan to reduce slopes below the high water
elevation established for the pond to within the range of 6/1 to
10/1 preferred.
G. Revise the grading plan to reflect the relocation of the 834 contour
elevation (high water level of the pond) beyond the building pads
located on Lots 4 and 5, Block 3.
H. Revise the grading plan to incorporate an emergency overflow from
the pond at an elevation below proposed structure elevations on
Block 3.
I. Revise the grading plan to reflect an additional catch basin at the
northeast corner of Lot 3, Block 4 to intercept backyard drainage.
This catch basin should be connected via storm sewer to the storm
water holding pond in Block 3.
J. Revise the grading plan to reflect basement elevations for Lots 1 -
5, Block 3, at a minimum of 836.1, which is two feet higher than the
high water elevation for the storm water holding pond. The graded
elevation around the structures in Block 3 should be a minimum of
two feet higher than the emergency overflow elevation provided for
the holding pond.
2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off, utility, and erosion control
plans for review by the City Engineer.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Pay the Cash Park Fee.
B. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading.
4. All lots shall be graded concurrent with street construction.
5. Plans shall be submitted depicting a by-pass lane and right turn lane on
County Road 18 and constructed as required by Hennepin County.
6. Concurrent with the construction of the Bluff's East 5th Addition, proponent
shall install a temporary 2-inch thick , bituminous surface for Bluff Road.
HENNEPIN
October
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
320 Washington Av. South
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468
935-3381
T1Y935-6433
9, 1987
Mr. Chris Enger
Planning Director
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Mr. Enger:
RE: Proposed Plat - Bluffs East 5th Addition
CSAH 18/1, Southwest quadrant
Section 36, Township 116, Range 22
Hennepin County Plat No. 1577
Review and Recommendations
Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County
review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat
and make the following comments:
- Hennepin County is preparing a plan for future right of way requirements
for the CSAH 18/CSAH l(Pioneer Trail) intersection. The final right of way
needs along CSAH 1 or CSAH 18 will not be known until that plan is
completed. For information on right of way needs from the entire Bluffs
East Country PUD contact Bruce Polaczyk, Hennepin County Preliminary Design
Engineer,
- As part of the improvements to the existing Bluff Road/CSAH 18 intersection
the developer must construct a by-pass lane (Attachment 1) and a right turn
lane (Attachment 2).
- Hennepin County strongly recommends that Eden Prairie not permit the
connection between the Bluffs East PUD and the Cardarelle/Pemtom
Development until the improvements highlighted in the letter to Al Gray,
Eden Prairie City Engineer, (Attachment 3) are completed to improve the
sight distance on CSAH 1.
- Any revision to an existing access to a county road requires an approved
Hennepin County entrance permit before beginning any construction. Contact
our Maintenance Division for entrance permit forms.
- All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approvrd
utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not
limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and
landscaping. Contact our Maintenance Division for utility permit forms.
HENNEPIN COUNTY
on equal opportunity employer ATTACHMENT A
C. Enger
October 8, 1987 .
Page 2
- The developer must restore all areas di
s
t
u
r
b
e
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
i
n
County right of way.
Please direct any response or questions t
o
L
e
s
W
e
i
g
e
l
t
.
Sincer°7
naAl 7/114".
David W. Schmidt, P.E.
Transportation Planning
DWS/LOW:lw
BY -PASS LANE (RECOMMENDED DIMENSIONS) 50' • •I• 200' LA 4(774 C.11/1-1E-A17- HENN. CO. TRAFFIC DIVISION JANUARY 1979
300' d 30'R RIGHT TURN LANE (RECOMMENDED DIMENSIONS) X7-7-14c,ot1eNT 2 HENN. CO. TRAFFIC DIVISION
HENNEPIN
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
320 Washington Av. South
Hopkins. Minnesota 55343-8468
935-3361
TTY 935-6433
July 28. 1987
Al Gray, City Engineer
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Re: Cardarelle/Hustad Developments
Al:
As discussed during our meeting of July 22. 1987, Hennepin County is
requesting that the City of Eden Prairie pursue a roadway improvement on
County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 1 immediately west of CSAH 18 in
conjunction with the above noted developments. Hennepin County strongly
prefers that this project reflect the enclosed plans that were previously
proposed. Briefly, these plans included extending the four lane srgment
approximately one-quarter mile west of CSAM 18 and, more importantly,
flattening the 'S curves along this segment.
The main reason we are requesting this work is that some improvement to
CSAH 1 is necessary due to the new street intersection proposed by
Cardarelle. Since this access location is basically 'locked in' and is
potentially hazardous due to the 'S' curves and since Hennepin County
policy requires auxiliary lanes for street entrances serving substantial
developments where ADTs exceed 5000 vehicles per day, this plan seems a reasonable solution.
Moreover, if the City's storm sewer project can be included. unit costs can
hopefully be minimized while providing substantial improvements.
Thanks for your cooperation in this matter and please call if there are
further questions.
Sincerely,
t<242 :.
David K. Zetterstrom
Entrance Permit Coordinator
r7ACHNIEN 7 3
DKZ:pl
cc: Frank Cardarelle
Duane Herbst, Pemtom Corporation
HENNEPIN COUNTY
on couo: coportunitv vrr:cyci
-MEMORADUM-
TO: Eden Prairie Planning Commission
FROM: Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
DATE: October 22, 1987
SUBJECT: BLUFFS EAST 5TH ADDITION
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
Introduction
The purpose of this memo is to outline the Engineering Division's review of the
preliminary plat documents for Bluffs East 5th Addition. The comments in this
memo will be directed specifically toward storm water management features which
are described on figures 10, 11 and 12 of the preliminary plat submittal.
Figure 10: Grading and Erosion Control
The grading plan shows the development of a storm water holding pond over Lots
2, 3, 4 and 5 of Block 3 Bluffs East 5th Addition. The need for this holding
pond was identified in a overall storm sewer study for the Bluff Country POD.
This holding pond will receive storm water run-off from a significant drainage
area north of the Bluffs East 5th Addition. The outlet storm sewer for this
holding pond is currently under construction as part of City Improvement
Contract 52-096.
The design parameters for this holding pond were first outlined in a report
prepared by Hedlund Engineering and submitted to the City of Eden Prairie in
June, 1986. That report indicated the holding pond would have a normal water
elevation of 826 and a high water elevation of 835.7 based on the critical 100-
year storm event. To perform within these parameters the holding pond would
require approximately 13 acre feet of storage between normal and high water
elevations.
Based on the capacity of the out-fall storm sewer currently under construction,
studies performed by a consultant to the City indicate that the storage
requirements may be reduced to approximately 4 acre feet between the normal
water elevation 826 and an anticipated high water elevation of 834.1. The
design criteria shown on Figure 10 indicates an anticipated high water level of
832.0. The storage volume is not indicated on the plan. The design of the
pond should be coordinated with the design parameters most recently established
based on the hydraulic capacity of the out-fall storm sewer currently under
construction.
The pond as currently shown on Figure 10 would be a wet holding pond with a
water depth of approximately 4 feet when the water surface was at normal water
elevation of 826.0. The natural soils in this area are very sandy and we would
ATTACHMENT B
Page 2 of 2 October 22, 1987
anticipate high seepage rates making maintenance of the normal water elevation
difficult during dry periods. If a wet pond is proposed,a seal may be desir-
able in order to maintain normal water levels. Wet holding ponds may experience
weed and algae growth and develop other undesirable characateristics during the
drier summer months. The Public Works Department prefers dry holding pond
designs with provisions to carry low flows within an enclosed conduit system
below grade.
The current design utilizes 3 to 1 side slopes for the pond both below and
above the normal water elevation of 826.0. Steep slopes increase the hazard of
this type of facility to small children. We would recommend that slopes below
the high water elevation established for the pond be flattened with slopes in
the range of 6:1 to 10:1 preferred.
Figure 10 indicates the 834 contour (high water level for the pond) extending
into building pads on Lots 4 and 5 of Block 3. These contours need to be
revised so that ponding limits are retained and the backyards and do not extend
into building pads.
Based on the current grading plan a blockage of the outlet storm sewer or a
storm event exceeding the design criteria for this system such as occured on
July 23, 1987 could result in ponding elevations of approximately 840. This
would result in the flooding of the five proposed single family homes on Block
3, Bluffs East 5th Addition. We would recommend that the grading plan be
revised to incorporate an emergency overflow at an elevation below proposed
structure elevations.
Figure 11 - Proposed Utilities
In addition to the storm sewer shown on this drawing we would recommend the
addition of a catch basin at the northeast corner of Lot 3, Block 4 to inter-
cept the backyard drainage from Lots 4, 5 and 6 of Block 4 as well as the
backyards of future lots to be developed on the south side of Meade Lane as it
is extended easterly as part of a future subdivision. This caich basin should
be connected via storm sewer to the storm water holding pond in Block 3.
Figure 12 - Development Plan
This figure shows the proposed building pad elevations for each of the residen-
tial lots within the subdivision. Rear basement walkouts are currently proposed
for Lots 1 through 5 in Block 3. Proposed basement elevation should be raised
to a minimum of 836.1 which is two feet higher than the anticipated high water
elevation for the storm water holding pond in the rear of these lots. In
addition, the graded elevation around the structures in Block 3 should be a
mimimum of two feet higher than the emergency overflow elevation provided for
the holding pond. These criteria may make it difficult to develop these partic-
ular lots utilizing rear walkout basements.
Eden Prairie Planning Commission October 26, 1987 - Page Four
I.
C. BLUFFS EAST 5th ADDITION, by Hustad Development
Corporation. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural
to R1-13.5 on 17.68 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 30.1
acres into 34 single family lots, 3 outlots, and road right-
of-way. Location: Southeast of Meade Lane extension, west
of Franlo Road, northwest of Antlers Ridge extension. A
public hearing.
Bob Smith, representative for proponent, presented the preliminary
plat depicting the subdivision of 30.1 gross acres into 34 single
family lots and three outlots at a net density of 1.9 dwelling
units per acre. Outlot C, approximately 16 acres, will remain
unzoned, for development in the future. Lot sizes will range from
14,020 to 30,660 square feet with an average of 18,937 square
feet. The lots will meet the minimum requirement of the R1-13.5
zoning district with the exception of Lot 7 and Lot 13, Block 1,
which have been revised to meet the minimum street frontage
requirements of 55 and 85 feet, respectively. Outlut B is
proposed as a sign location and will be maintained by the
Homeowners' Association.
Eden Prairie Planning Commission - October 26, 1987 Page Five
Proponent explained the grading proposed is consistent with the
mass grading plan of the approved PUD. Fill in the upper portions
of the ravine will not result in the loss of any significant trees
of twelve inches or greater in size. The amount of fill proposed
is minimal compared with the total length of the ravine. No
stormwater run-off is proposed to drain into either ravine. The
regraded areas along the ravine were proposed at 2/1 slopes,
however to help minimize erosion and per Staff Report, the slopes
will be decreased to 2.5/1 and a fiber blanket with a deep seed
mixture will be utilized to stabilize the slopes after regrading.
A grading plan will be submitted to reflect the decreased slopes.
Don Uram, Assistant Planner, stated the project is consistent with
the PUD Bluff Country Developer's Agreement previously approved;
however, plans shall be revised in accordance with the list of
recommendations by Alan Gray, City Engineer, regarding drainage
in the area.
Concern has been raised regarding the grading of lots adjacent to
Purgatory Creek. City policy currently requires all lots to be
graded concurrent with street construction. Revised grading plan
shall be submitted reflecting lot grading.
Acting Chairman Hallett felt the proposal has a lot of loose ends
to take care of before approaching City Council. The grading
proposal should be approved by Planning Commission in order for
City Council to approve street, traffic, and drainage proposals.
The proposal should come back before the Planning Commission for
further review based on revised plans. The Commission should be
concerned with street frontage, tree replacement, grading plan
per City Engineer, and sidewalks.
Fell inquired as to soil report. Enger responded that soil report
indicated the area is sandy salt with very little top soil, which
was the cause of the wash out in the 60's. Developer will
reconstruct washed out area.
Fell questioned the traffic increase on Pioneer Trail and Homeward
Hills Road, and if traffic lights are needed. Enger responded that
traffic was evaluated and the Ctiy will check back on this after
the project has been constructed to study warrant of a signal at that
intersection.
Wallace Hustad, Developer, stated to the Commission that the
Developer and the City have had meetings on this project and
have resolved the majority of issues. However, specific
technical issues remain which require solution by the Engineer-
ing Department.
I.
Eden Prairie Planning Commission October 26, 1987 - Page Six
Fell agreed with Staff, but feels technical review
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
b
y
the Planning Commission rather than at
c
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
.
I
f
i
t
can be resolved, Staff should present i
t
t
o
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
.
Enger responded that its down to one it
e
m
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
g
r
a
d
e
t
h
e
c
r
e
e
k
lots now or later.
Acting Chairman Hallett felt that due
t
o
t
h
e
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
o
f
opinions on this matter, perhaps Commis
s
i
o
n
w
a
s
c
o
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
e
w
i
t
h
City Engineer's expertise and would de
p
e
n
d
o
n
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
presented.
In response to Chairman's request for
a
u
d
i
e
n
c
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
,
D
a
v
i
d
J
.
Keller of 10749 Grant Drive, responded
t
h
a
t
h
e
l
i
v
e
s
a
t
T
h
i
r
d
Avenue and his backyard is a wet pond.
H
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
proposal will replace it with a dry po
n
d
d
u
e
t
o
t
h
e
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
.
A
n
d
if so, will it deal with the aesthetics
i
n
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
,
a
s
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
of debris and the rain combined are uns
i
g
h
t
l
y
.
Proponent responded that the actual pon
d
h
a
s
n
o
t
b
e
e
n
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
but the design will respond to neighbo
r
h
o
o
d
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
s
.
K
e
l
l
e
r
responded this answered his question.
Upon no other audience participation, A
c
t
i
n
g
C
h
a
i
r
m
a
n
H
a
l
l
e
t
t
moved for motion to close public hearin
g
.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Bye and seconded by
D
o
d
g
e
t
o
c
l
o
s
e
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
hearing.
Motion carried 5-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Bye and seconded by Dodge to recommend to the City Council approval of the request o
f
H
u
s
t
a
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Corporation for Zoning District Change
f
r
o
m
R
u
r
a
l
t
o
R
1
-
1
3
.
5
o
n
17.68 acres, to be known as Bluffs Eas
t
5
t
h
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
plans dated September 25, 1987, subjec
t
t
o
t
h
e
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
of the Staff Report dated October 23,
1
9
8
7
,
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
revised grading plan as determined by a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
L
o
t
s
1-7.
Motion carried 5-0-0
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Bye and seconded by
D
o
d
g
e
t
o
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
t
o
the City Council approval of the reque
s
t
o
f
H
u
s
t
a
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Corporation for Preliminary Plat of 30
.
1
a
c
r
e
s
i
n
t
o
3
4
s
i
n
g
l
e
family lots, three outlots, and road r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
,
t
o
b
e
k
n
o
w
n
Eden Prairie Planning Commission October 26, 1987 - Page Seven
as Bluffs East 5th Addition, based on plans dated September 25,
1987, subject to recommendations of the Staff Report dated
October 23, 1987, and as amended by the previous motion.
Motion carried--5-0-0
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
RE:
City Council
Jean Johnson, Zoning Administrator
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
October 26, 1987
City Code: Screening and Landscaping
Recently, a developer challenged the Staff's determination that rooftop mech
a
n
i
c
a
l
screening was necessary. It was further challenged that if the rooftop mecha
n
i
c
a
l
screening was necessary that Code did not require that the screening occur a
t
t
h
e
rooftop. Instead of the traditional rooftop screening, the developer pro
p
o
s
e
d
screening of the mechanical via use of berms and 18 foot high evergreens.
Staff informed the developer that administration of the Screening and Landscape
C
o
d
e
has never included plant materials for screening of rooftop mechanical.
S
t
a
f
f
raised concern over the ability to maintain such large evergreens on top of
a
3
:
1
slope, storm damage to trees, and that evergreens would not physically s
c
r
e
e
n
rooftop mechanical.
The result was a request by the proponent of the Board of Adjustments and App
e
a
l
s
for Code interpretation.
The Board decided plant material was not precluded from use in the Code and migh
t
b
e
( lore desireable than the traditional rooftop screening panels.
Staff still strongly supports screening rooftop mechanical at the roof not with
u
s
e
of plant material located on the ground. If the Council concurs, we have atta
c
h
e
d
some Code amendments to clarify this issue.
The Planning Commission endorsed the draft code amendments at their October
1
3
,
1987, meeting and referred the item to the Council.
G. Screening and Landscaping.
1. CefinitIons, for the mimmoses of this Section, the
folloving terms shall have the meanings stated:
(a) Caliper: The length of a straight line measured
through the trunk of a tree twelve ((2) inches above the base.
(B) Coniferous/Evergreen Tree: A woody Plant which,
at maturity. is at least thirty (33) feet or wore in lielOst, with a single
trunk, fully branched to the ground, having foliage on the outemmost Portion
of the branches yew-round.
294
(c) Clear Cutting: Removal of all existing signi-
ficant natural vegetation on a part iculr piece of property.
(d) Deciduous Overstory Shade Tree: A woody plant
1,hich, at maturity, is thirty (33) feet or mare in height, with a single
trunk, unbranched for several feet above the ground, having a defined crown.
and imich loses leaves annually.
(e) Deciduoui Iliderstory Ornamental Tree: A woody
plant which, at maturity, is less than thrity (33) feet in height, with
single trunk. urbranched for several feet above the ground, having a defined
crown which loses leaves annually.
(f) Fence: My partition, structure, wall, or gate
erected as a divider marker, barrier, or enclosure, and located along the
boundary or within the required yard.
(g) Landscape: Site amenities, Including trees. shrubs, ground covers, flowers, fencing, berms. retaining walls, and other
outdoor furnishings.
(h) Performance Bond. A bond with goad and sufficient sureties, approved by the City Manager, which is conditioned upon
commlete and satisfactory immlerrentation of an approved landscape Plan and
'Mich names the City as obligee.
(1) Plant Material Average Size (Coniferous): The
total height of all coniferous trees tin (6) feet or over, divided by the
total number of such trees.
(j) Plant Material Average Size (Shade or Ornmental): The total diameter of all deciduous overstory trees two and one-
half (2 I/2) inches or acre In diameter,•divided by the total number of trees.
(k) Mechanical Equipment: Heating, ventilation, exhaust, air conditioning, and communication units integral to and located on
top, beside, or adjacent to a building.
(1) Retaining Wall: A wall or structure constructed
of stone. concrete, wood, or other materials, used to retain soil, as a slope
transition, or edge of a planting area.
(m) Screenina: A barrier mdch blocks all views fray
Publ lc roads and Adi f ering land uses to off -street park ing areas. loading
areas, service and utility areas, and mechanical equipment.
2. Landscape Plan Required.
In every case Afiere landscaping is required by
Provision of the City Code or by an approval granted by the City, for a
building or structure to be constructed on any property, the applicant for the
building permit shall Wog a landscape plan prepared in accordance with the
Provisions of this Section. The Landscape Plan shall inClude the following
information:
(a) General: Name and address of developer/owner;
Maine and address of landscape architect/designer; Otte of plan preparation;
Date and description of all revisions; same of project or develonent.
(b) Site Maw: One (I) scale droning of the site
based upon a survey of Property lines with Indication of scale and north
point; Mane and alignment of proposed and milting adjacent mm-site streets;
Location of all proposed utility easements and right-of-ways; Location of
misting and Proposed buildings; Topographic contours at tto-foot contour
intervals; Existing and prcoosed location of parking areas; Water bodies;
Proposed sidevalks; Percent of site not covered by Impervious surface.
294-1
7(o •
CHANGES ARE UNDERLINED
adjacent
(c) Landscape Proposal: Ile (2) scale trawIngs of proposed landscaping for the site based upon a surve
y
o
f
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
s
w
i
t
h
indicattcm of scale and North . point ; Existing .and
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
.
t
o
p
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
contours using main sea level datum at tap-/not conto
u
r
i
n
t
e
r
v
a
l
s
;
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
o
f
proposed planting beds and foundation plantings; Del
i
n
e
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
b
o
t
h
s
o
d
d
e
d
and seeded areas; Location and identification of p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
o
r
marmade materials used to provide screening from ad
j
a
c
e
n
t
a
n
d
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
i
n
g
properties, a separate cross-section drawing of
M
i
t
c
h
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
a
t
legible wale illustrating the effectiveness of propose
d
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
;
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
and identification of trees; Details of fences,
t
i
e
w
a
l
l
s
,
p
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
b
a
i
t
,
retaining walls, tot lots, picnic weas. Williaiid other landsca
p
e
improvements, Including a separate drawing of ty
p
i
c
a
l
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
details in legible scale; Location of landscape isla
n
d
s
a
n
d
P
l
a
n
t
e
-
b
e
d
s
w
i
t
h
indentification of plant materials used, Including
s
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
o
f
typical sections of these areas In legible scale.
(d) Planting Schedule: A table containing the cannon names and botanical noses, average size of
p
l
a
n
t
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
,
r
o
o
t
specifications, quantities, wecIal planting instruc
t
i
o
n
s
,
and proposed planting dates of all plant materials included in the
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
.
3. Performance Road Required. No building permit shall
b
e
issued until the applicant for the building permi
t
s
h
a
l
l
f
i
l
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Manager a performance bond, with i corporation appro
v
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
a
s
surety thereon, or other guwantee acceptable to th
e
C
i
t
y
,
i
n
a
n
a
m
a
i
n
t
o
b
e
determined by the City Manner, but for no lens than one and one-half (1 1/2) tires and no more than two (2) times the amount esti
m
a
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
as the cost of caroleting said landscape., and scr
e
e
n
i
n
g
.
T
h
e
p
e
r
f
o
r
e
a
r
c
e
bond mist cover too complete growing seasons o
r
o
n
e
f
u
l
l
c
a
l
e
n
d
a
r
y
e
a
r
subsequent to the completion and mist be conditioned-upon complete and satisfactory implementation of the approved landscap
e
p
l
a
n
.
4. All landscaping shall be implemented in accordance wi
t
h
.
(a) Minimum Site Requirements for Plantings: Deciduous overstory plantings shall be a minimim of tie and one-half (2 1/2) caliper inches; deciduous understory trees shall be a minimum of one and one-half (1 In) caliper inches; coniferous trees shall be a minimum of six (6) feet in height.
(b) Total Caliper Inches Required: In Order to achieve landscaping which is appropriate in scale with the site of a building and site, the minimum nunger of caliper inches of trees required shall be detrmined by dividing the total gross square footage of a
l
l
f
l
o
o
r
s
o
f
a building by 329. A single-story building in etcess of 20 feet in height shal
l
be considered a two-story building for the purposes of determining its total gross square footage. A mixture of plant material si
z
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
a
s
follows:
the following:
294-2
0, 7 7
PLANT MATERIN. SIZES (In Caliper Inches)
guild lug
eight
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0 .5 .0
1 70%
10%
10%
10%
2 60%
10%
10%
10%
3 50%
10%
10%
10%
la%
4 40%
20%
10%
10%
10%
30%
20%
20%
10%
10%
5mstOr les 20%
20%
20%
20%
10%
Percentage of trees required to be of this caliper size.
For the purposes of satisfying the total caliper inch requirement, coniferous trees can be con
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
e
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
to cnerstory trees by dividing the height of a coniferous tree 6 ft. heiMit minimum by 2.4 to
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
e
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
Caliper Inches.
NOTE: Wen determination of height results in a fractional foot, any fraction of 0.5 or less may b
e
d
i
s
r
e
g
a
r
d
e
d
;
a
fraction in excess of 0.5 shall be counted as one foot.
294-3
(e) Planting islands; Planting islands shall be required
where necessary to visually break so expanses of hard surface parking areas. for
safe and efficient traffic movement. and to define rows of paling. Planting
islands shall occupy at least five (S%) percent of the parking area.
(d) Method of installation: All deciduous and coniferous trees shall be balled and burlapoed. staked, and guyed in accordance with National
Nurseryman's standards. All shrubs shall be potted.
Se) Sodding and Ground favor: All open areas Of a site not
occupied by building, parking, or storage shall be sodded. Exceptions to this are
seeding of future expansion areas as shomn on approved plans; ubdiSturbed areas
containing existing natural vegetation 'Mich can be maintained free of foreign and
noxious materials; and, areas designated an Coen space for future expansion area
properly planted and maintained with prairie grass.
Slopes and germs: Final sloOes greater than the ratio
of 311 will not be permitted without special approval or treatment. such as special
seed mixtures or reforestation, terracing, or retaining walls. gemming used to
provide required screening of parking lots and other open areas shall not have
slopes in excess of 3/1.
(g) Maintenance: The property owner shall be responsible
for replacement of any dead trees, shrubs, ground covers, and sOddinei
(h) Erosion Control: All areas of any site shall be seeded
or sodded within thirty (30) days on slopes of 3/1 or greater or in areas wisere
storm run-off will drain into natural drainage basin or bonding areas.
(1) Preservation of Wetland and Woodland Areas: It is the
policy of the City to preserve the natural wetland and woodland areas througsout the
City, and with respect to specific site•defelcoment. to retain as far as practical,
substantial tree stands and wetlands which can be ircOrporated into the Landscape
Plan. so clear cutting of woodland areas shall be permitted. Shade trees of six
(6) inch or more caliper shall be saved unless it can be demonstrated that there is
no other feasible way to develop the site. The Council may require replacement of
any removed trees on a caliper inch for caliper inch basis.
Si) Placement of Plant Materials: No landscaping shall be
allowed within any drainage utility easements, road right-of-may, or immediately
adjacent to any drive,ay or road intersection when it would interfere with
motorists views of the street or roadway.
Source: Ordinance 15-85
Effective Date: 5-29.115
294-4,part of
1) Irregular in S an ape.
2) Exposed and/or p ding fans, grills, Pipes.
tubes • wires ents.
3) Unfinishe tal coverfall,exposed rivets, exposed seams.
Sourcit\prdinance No. 9-87
Effective-Date: 5-6-87
294-4
k) Mechanical Equipment Screening: All mechanical
possessing one more of the following characteristics shall
screened from all pub4c roads and adjacent differing land
or artificial materials. a manner architecturally in al or building on the site.
Proposed Code
K. Mechanical Equipment Screening
1. All mechanical equipment mounted on the exterior of a
building and possessing one or more of—the characteristics
listed below as K. 3. shall be physicilly screened from all
public roads and adjacent differing land uses with -TEtory
prefiniirlig - metal wood laminated Wiffi metal_ or other
building material in a manner architectufalIY -integriT -5-
the buildiTTF-Kilaings on site.
2. All mechanical equipment located on the ground and
possessing one or more of the characteristicsFiEfiristics liste
ci
below sEill -6e7—ysicall7 screened from all eWlic roads
and adjacilif-Uiffering land urert—Evit ifffier plant matiFfiT
or factory,prefinished metal, wood laminated with metal, or
other building material in a manner architectuT-iTTY integral iii—The building or buildings on site.
3. Irregular in size and shape;
Exposed and/or protruding fans, grills, pipes, tubes, wires,
vents.
Unfinished metal covering, exposed rivets, exposed seams.
nment
ysically
with either natural
to the buildings
k.,)z
Eden Prairie Planning Commission----Oct. 13, 1987
Page 5
items have been addressed and solved. Everything, other than
providing graphic form, has been presented. They did not
anticipate changes required thereby causing the time crunch.
Acting Chairman Bye stated that the Commission represents the
people. Proponents were asking the Commission to base decisions
and vote on something they cannot see so as not to delay their
timetable. We stated that the Commission takes their role
seriously. They cannot review what they cannot see.
Director Enger proposed that Planning Commission delay recommenda-
tion to City Council until presentation of massing model and
architectural rendering are complete, and proponent presents said
material at November 16th meeting; but keep them on schedule with
the City Council.
Commissioner Ruebling stated there is a mutual agreement on
concept but the Commission does not see it; timetables are always .
present.
Kelly Doran, Vantage representative, again requested that
Commission not tie the manual to the Marriott proposal.
Planning Commission understands the manual will take time as it
goes back and forth from Vantage to staff but did request an
outline version of design framework manual (minimum two pages)
to guide Commission's approval on Marriott.
Acting Chairman Bye requested a motion on this proposal.
MOTION:
Motion was made by Commissioner Fell, seconded by Anderson to
continue Marriott Development Proposal until October 26th, to
allow proponent time to provide and present an outline of Design
Framework Manual to advise this project and to guide City
Council, Massing Model, and Architectural Rendering indicating
all revisions and rooftop mechanical screening specifications.
Further, that staff be directed to publish this item for the
November 3, 1987 Council Meeting for public hearing.
Motion Carried 4-0-0
V. OLD BUSINESS
None
VI. NEW BUSINESS
Chair asked that staff thank Ann Kenyon for her work as
recording secretary and wish her well in her future endeavors.
Also thank Kate for her assistance in the past.
A. Landscape Ordinance
The Board of Appeals recently interpreted the Ordinance to
allow plant material to be utilized on the ground to screen
rooftop mechanical equipment. Since the Ordinance has been
Eden Prairie Planning Commission----Oct. 13, 1987 Page 6
interpreted in this fashion, but cannot work in this way as
a practical matter, Staff has written some clarifying
language which will required rooftop screening for rooftop
units and allow plant material to be utilized for screening
of ground-mounted mechanical units.
MOTION:
Motion made by Ruebling, seconded by Anderson to recommend
approval of amendment to the City Council.
Motion Carried 4-0-0
B. 1-494 Corridor Study
Study on 1-494 corridor was released and a brief summary
indicated the solution is to build on more lanes in each
direction and institute ramp metering. Light rail transit • (LRT) is a political issue and Eden Prairie at present time • does not have population to warrant reliance on LRT. Advisory
meetings for 1-494 Traffic Management and Road Improvements
are every three weeks and the City should be represented to
oversee whether it fits in with our plans.
C. Joint Planning Commission--City Council Meeting
The City Council has set October 20, 1987 at 6:00 PM prior
to their Council Meeting at 7:30 PM as the joint meeting with
the Commission. This joint meeting is at the Commission
request and items for discussion should be identified to
appear on agenda.
Commission desires to address the issue that when a proposal
has been denied 0-0-5 and City Council approves it, then the
proponent should come back to Planning Commission for review
so the development proposal meets City Code. There must be a check and balance.
Commission will list and identify items that need to be
addressed now to prevent problems in 15-20 years such as parking lots, and slope sites and present to council at the October 20th meeting.
Adjournment at 10:00 PM
Respectfully submitted,
Sue Masear Anderson
;wei 1
NOVEMBER 17,1987
37988 VOID OUT CHECK
37992 VOID OUT CHECK
38357 VOID OUT CHECK
38358 VOID OUT CHECK
38389 VOID OUT CHECK
38410 VOID OUT CHECK
38493 VOID OUT CHECK
38510 VOID OUT CHECK
38526 HOPKINS POSTMASTER
38527 HOPKINS POSTMASTER
38528 DAN JELEN
38529 VOID OUT CHECK
38530 DANA GIBBS
38531 CRAFT VILLAGE
38532 UNIVERSITY OF MN
38533 RELATIONS ASSOCIATES INC
38534 MN CITY MGMr ASSOC
38535 DAYSTAR BUILDERS
38536 ICMA
38537 MINNESOTA GAS CO
38538 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO
38539 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
38540 AT & T COMMUNICATIONS
38541 AT & T COMMUNICATIONS
38542 AT & T COMMUNICATIONS
;8543 JASON-NORTHCO PROPERTIES
38544 WELSH COMPANIES
38545 LINDA MARTIGNETTI
38546 NICK RYAN
38547 MICHAEL REGENSCHEID
38548 IVY LAMOREAux
38549 JEANETTE GILLIS
38550 MARION MILLER
38551 AMY ABBATE
38552 ANY A3BATE
38553 PETTY CASH
38554 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE INC
38555 ERIC SAUGEN
38556 ELIZABETH SAUGEN
38557 DEM CON LANDFILL INC
38558 LOIS BOErTCHER
38559 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
38560 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
38561 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO
38562 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP
38563 PERA
38564 UNITED WAY OF MPLS
38565 CITY-COUNTY CREDIT UNION
38566 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC
38567 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN
'8568 STATE OF MINNESOTA
J8569 PRICE PRO SPORTING GOODS
38570 SUPPLIES 7 HI ENTER INC
POSTAGE-UTILITY BILLING
POSTAGE-SENIOR CENTER NEWSLETTER
EXPENSES-PARK MAINTENANCE
PACKET DELIVERIES
SUPPLIES-SENIOR CENTER
CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT
-CONFERENCE-PUBLIC WORKS DIEM/PUBLIC
-SAFETY DIRECTOR/CITY MANAGER/HUMAN
RESOURCES
DUES-CITY MANAGER
SERVICE-HOMEWARD HILLS PARK
SUBSCRIPTICN-CITY MANAGER
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
NOVEMBER 87 RENT-LIQUOR STORE
NOVEMBER 87 RENT-CITY HALL
REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES
REFUND-SKATING CLASSES
REFUND-RACQUErBALL CLASSES
INSTRUCTOR-KIDS KORNER
INSTRUCTOR-KIDS KORNER
REFUND-SKATING CLASSES
REFUND-SKATING CLASSES
EXPENSES-CITY HALL
GAS CYLINDERS-COMMUNITY CENTER
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
WASTE DISPOSAL CHGS-STREET& PARKS DEPT
SERVICE-10/19 P & R COMMISSION MEETING
PAYROLL 10-30-87
PAYROLL 10-30-87
PAYROLL 10-30-87
PAYROLL 10-30-87
PAYROLL 10-30-87
PAYROLL 10-30-87
PAYROLL 10-30-87
NOVEMBER 87 INSURANCE
NOVEMBER 87 INSURANCE
MOTOR VEHICLE INFORMATION
RACUEISALLS-COMMUNITY SERVICES
NOVEMBER 87 RENT
20.00-
20.00-
6.15-
67.81-
440.00-
660.00-
432.00-
335.78-
465.38
39.29
58.40
0.00
105.00
47.15
130.00
180.00
35.00
2530.00
58.00
5332.39
485.88
17023.26
23.59
831.75
99.18
5339.21
15566.33
18.75
13.00
58.00
15.50
146.00
277.00
20.00
22.00
58.96
156.39
216.00
216.00
434.00
31.00
44183.58
11458.88
4404.00
983.48
21842.34
158.88
925.13
9294.30
16445.83
149.00
23.40
4466.19
16238566
NOVEMER 17,1987
38571 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC
38572 EAGLE WINE CO
38573 PRIOR WINE CO
38574 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
38575 QUALITY WINE CO
38576 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
38977 PAUSTIS & SONS CO
38578 GUARANTEE MUTUAL LIFE 00
38579 GUARANTEE MUTUAL LIFE CO
38580 EAGLE WINE CO
38581 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC
38582 PRIOR WINE CO
38583 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
38584 QUALITY WINE CO
38585 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
38586 PAUSTIS & SONS CO
38587 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO
38588 VOID OUT CHECK
38589 FIVE STAR CONSTRUCTION INC
38590 BEER WHOLESALERS INC
38591 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO
38592 COCA COLA ayrnau CO
38593 DAY DISTRIBUTING 03
38594 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO
38595 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO
38596 MARK VII SALES
38597 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO
38598 ROYAL CROWN BEVERAGE CO
38599 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO
38600 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE CO
38601 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
38602 BARBAROSSA AND SONS INC
38603 BROWN & CRIS INC
38604 BROWN & CRIS INC
38605 MAX JOHNSON TRUCKING
38606 RICHARD KNUTSON INC
38607 MACHTEMES CONSTRUCTION
38608 NODLAND CONSTRUCTION CO
38609 NODLAND CONSTRUCTION CO
38610 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO INC
38611 RICE LAKE CONTRACTING
38612 SHAFER CONTRACTING CO
38613 SHAW-LUNDQUIST ASSOC INC
38614 A & H WELDING & MFG CO
38615 AAA STRIPING SERVICE INC
38616 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC
38617 ACT ELECTRONICS INC
38618 MASOOD ALI
38619 AMERICAN COMPENSATION ASSOC
38620 AMERICAN HEAT
38621 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO
38622 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK
8623 AMERI-STAR LIGHTING
38624 AMERICAN SPEEDY PRINTING CENTERS
86511632
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
REMODEL CITY HALL-FINANCE DEPT
BEER
BEER
MIXES
BEER
BEER
BEER
BEER
MIXES
MIXES
BEER
MIXES
SERVICE
SERVICE-WELL HOUSES & WATER PLANT ADDN
SERVICE-SUNNYBROOK ROAD/NEMEC KNOLLS
SERVICE-BENNETT PLACE & BLOSSOM ROAD
SERVICE-1987 LIME SLUDGE REMOVAL
SERVICE-SHADY OAK & ROWLAND ROAD
SERVICE-BAKER ROAD TO ROWLAND ROAD
SERVICE-HIDDEN GLEN 3RD ADDITION
SERVICE-WYNDHAM KNOLL
SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DR & ST ANDREW DR
SERVICE-HOMEWARD HILLS ROAD
SERVICE-COUNTY ROAD 4 TO MITCHELL ROAD
SERVICE-WATER PLANT ADDITION
LIME BIN LINKAGE-WATER DEPT
PARKING LOT STRIPING-OLD CITY HALL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CLAMPS/HOSES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EXPENSES-ENGINEERING DEPT
DUES-HUMAN RESOURCES
VHS TRAINING TAPES-FIRE DEPT
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
BOND PAYMENTS
BULBS-P/N & PARKS DEPARTMENT
PRINTING-COMMUNITY CENTER
2/3
2816.96
1544.44
461.89
4417.23
1225.73
3861.86
124.31
412.69
1573.22
23.62
3509.01
505.93
9832.40
2351.27
7064.64
273.63
178.00
0.00
3447.62
4447.30
66.45
683.75
6159.88
13665.40
567.94
22430.30
675.50
99.20
17573.10
26.16
9435.26
63747.85
12491.88
35778.23
32062.50
37394.47
18772.00
50171.83
12120.40
69544.78
16625.00
20465.48
203999.80
448.00
264.00
278.74
178.00
5.00
75.00
650.00
9.41
169962.61
563.10
53.55
NOVEMBER 17,1987
38625 AMERICAN TEST CENTER
38626 EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOC INC
38627 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC
38628 ASTLEFORD INTL INC
38629 B R W INC
38630 BATTERY& TIRE WAREHOUSE INC
38631 BEST & FLANAGAN
38632 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY
38633 BLACK & VEATCH
38634 SAM BLOOM IRON & METAL CO INC
38635 BLUMBERG COMMUNICATIONS INC
38636 BOYM EQUIPMENT INC
38637 BRADY OFFICEWARE INC
38638 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING INC
38639 MAXINE BRUECK
38640 BUDGET PLUMBING
38641 BUILMIL CONSTRUCTION INC
38642 BUSINESS RECORDS CORP
38643 CARLSONS TREE SERVICE
38644 CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SER INC
38645 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO
38646 CHEMLAWN
38647 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
38648 JEFFREY CONRAD'
38649 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIP INC
38650 COPY EQUIPMENT INC
38651 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CO
38652 CRETEX PRESSURE PIPE INC
38653 CURTIS INDUSTRIES
38654 CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS INC
38655 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY
38656 DALCO
38657 MONICA M DAY
38658 DECORATIVE DESIGNS
38659 DORHOLT INC
38660 DON EVE & SONS
38661 ETNA SYSTEMS
38662 THE ECONOMICS PRESS INC
38663 EDEN INCENTIVES & PROMOTIONS
38664 EDEN PRAIRIE APPLIANCE
38665 THE EDEN PRAIRIE BODY SHOP
38666 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPT
38667 EDEN PRAIRIE HIGH SCHOOL
38668 EDEN PRAIRIE TRASHTRONICS
18669 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS
8670 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC
38671 ENGINEERED SYSTEMS INC
-INSPECTION OF AERIAL PLATFORM& LADDERS-
FIRE DEPT
SIGNS-SEWER DEPT
BLACKTOP-STREET & PARK DEPT
-WASHER/CHECK FRONT END ALIGNMENT/REPAIR
TURBO UNIT/SEAT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-SERVICE-TRAFFIC STUDY/COLUMBINE
-FEASIBILITY/DELL RD-EVENER WAY FEASI -
-BILITY/VALLEY VIEW-MITCHELL TO COUNTY
ROAD 4
-BATTERY/CLAMPS/WASHER FLUID/LAMP/FUSES-
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
LEGAL SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE-WATER PLANT EXPANSION
STEEL-PARK MAINTENANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES-FORESTRY DEPT
TWO PLOWS/TWO SANDERS-STREET DEPT
BULLETIN BOARD-COUNCIL CHAMBERS
-SERVICE-HOMEWARD HILLS ROAD/SUNNYBROOK
-& NEMEC HILLS/BAKER RD TO ROWLAND RD/
VALLEY VIEW RD
MILEAGE-FINANCE DEPT
REFUND-PLUMBING PERMIT
SUN CONTROL FILM ON WINDOWS-POLICE DEPT
LEGAL FORMS-ASSESSING DEPT
TREE REMOVAL-FORESTRY DEPT
CLUTCH PACK/BEARING-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE LEGAL ADS
LAWN SERVICE-OLD CITY HALL
SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW ROAD
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
CARRYING CASES-FIRE DEPT
VELLUM/TAPE/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS-ENG DEPT
NAMEPLATES-PLANNING DEPT
ADAPTORS-ENGINEERING DEPT
DRILL BITS/DISCS/CLEANER-EQUIPMENT MAINT
PUMP TEST & LUBE FIRE ENGINES
QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT
CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER & FIRE DEPT
SERVICE-EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER
SERVICE-CITY HALL
LETTERHEAD-WATER DEPT
HAY BALES-PCLICE DEPT
LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT
SUPPLIES - POLICE DEPT
ART SCREEN/EMBLEM - FIRE DEPT
PULLEY/BELT - PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
REFINISH/REPAIR '85 BLAZER - FIRE DEPT
CONFERENCE/DUES - FIRE DEPT
REFUND - OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL
OCTOBER '87 TRASH DISPOSAL
MANHOLE RINGS - SEWER DEPT
LAB SUPPLIES - WATER DEPT
GAS PUMP CARDS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
2205.0(
550.0(
13450.4c
419.5i
13919.0(
165.1C
380.0C .
703.2C .
9597.3C
101.08 .
26.41
14100.00
259.0C
1737.65
19.35
20.0C
248.40
104.49
2310.00
293.22
382.98
100.00
158.50
278.00
239.46
128.06
8.10
2416.00
171.52
2362.85
3358.18
184.69
120.00
49.50
129.00
52.50
104.05
30.07
582.20
52.85
555.00
245.00
13615.54
365.00
51.25
14.70
314.66
8667899
NOVEMBER 17,1987
38672 CHRIS ENGER
38673 RON ESS
38674 FINLEY BROS ENTERPRISES
38675 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY
38676 JOHN FRANE
38677 G & K SERVICES
38678 GAB BUSINESS SERVICES INC
38679 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC
38680 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD
38681 GME CONSULTANTS INC
38682 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
38683 GOPHER OIL COMPANY
38684 GREATER MPLS AREA
38685 GREENKEEPER INC
38686 GROSS OFFICE SUPPLY
38687 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC
38688 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC
38689 HARMON GLASS
38690 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
13691 HENN CTY DEPT OF PROPERTY TAX
38692 HENN CrY DEPT OF PROPERTY TAX
38693 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
38694 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT
38695 D C HEY CO INC
38696 GARY T HITT
38697 JACK HOENE
38698 MICHAEL J HOSTETLER
38699 IBM
38700 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC
38701 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSI
38702 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #272
38703 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC
38704 JERRY'S
38705 KAY JOHNSON
38706 PAUL JOHNSON
38707 MOLLY KOIVUMAKI
38708 MARY KOTTKE
38709 KRAEMERS HOW CENTER
38710 L A CONSTRUCTION INC
38711 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST
18712 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY
3428553
OCTOBER '87 EXPENSES
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-4 CANOPIES/BACKSTOP/RETAINING WALL/OVER-
THROW FENCE/POSTS/HINGES-PARK MAINTENANCE
SUPPLIES - LIQUOR STORE
OCTOBER '87 EXPENSES
-TOWELS/COVERALLS-WATER DEPT/PARK DEPT/
LIQUOR STORE
SERVICE
RADIO REPAIR - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
SERVICE
-SERVICE - HIDDEN GLEN 3RD ADDITION/
PRAIRIE VIEW DRIVE
-COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY MAINTENANCE-
HUMAN RESOURCES
HYDRAULIC OIL - WATER DEPT
DUES - ASSESSING DEPT
WINTERIZE LAWN SPRINKLER-FIRE BUILDING
SUPPLIES - PCLICE DEPT/CIVIL DEFENSE
FAN/INSTALL GLARE SHIELDS-PARK MAINTENANCE
-BLUFFS WEST VICINITY STORM SEWER/BLUFFS
-EAST 4TH ADDITION/SUNNYBROOICE RD/INTER-
-NATIONAL SCHOOL WATERMAIN/NEMEC KNOLLS/
-HOMEWARD HILLS PARK/PIONEER TRAIL &
COUNTY RD 18
SQUAD CAR DOOR GLASS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
PUMP RENTAL - JULY STORM DAMAGE
POSTAGE-VOTER REGISTRATION VERIFICATIONS
SERVICE - PLANNING DEPT
SEPTEMBER '87 BOARD OF PRISONERS
SEPTEMBER '87 BOOKING FEE
SERVICE
-REPAIR/MAINTENANCE - WATER SYSTEM
MAINTENANCE
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
NOVEMBER '87 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
CONFERENCE - COMMUNITY SERVICES
CONFERENCE- CITY MANAGER
EXPENSES - COUNCIL
OFFICE SUPPLIES - WATER DEPT
SUPPLIES - SENIOR PRCGRAMS
EXERCISE INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
3 EXCELSIOR BALES - STREET MAINTENANCE
CONFERENCE - POLICE DEPT
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-SCREWDRIVER/BRACKET/CLIPS/PLIERS/
-BATTERIES/TAPE/CLOTHESLINE/GAS STABILIZER
-SPRAYER/TWINE/NOZZLE/SHEETING-WATER DEPT/
STREET MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - DRAINAGE CONTROL
LIABILITY INSURANCE
-GLOVES/JACKETS/OVERALLS/HAZARDEOUS SPILL
-KIT/DANGEROUS PROPERTIES OF INDUSTRIAL
MATERIALS/DRUM KIT/PCB SUIT-FIRE DEPT
-Y2-1-'
179.21
267.00
6454.00
208.19
165.00
337.23
307.02
212.55
27.10
3480.70
469.00
64.30
65.00
89.00
260.32
159.55
13840.96
78.52
1800.00
22.26 :
326.00
521.00
579.28
75.00 1
108.65
50.00
56.50
424.32
30.00
25.00
63.00
24.86
12.75
256.00
75.00
68.23
40.00
234.58
445.00
212.00
2171.45
NOVEMBER 17,1987
38713 LAKESIDE FUSEE CORP 576 FUSEES - POLICE DEPT 491.01, 38714 ROBERT LAMBERT OCTOBER 87 EXPENSES 165.0C 38715 LANCE SUPPLIES - LIQUOR STORE 146.3C 38716 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD -JULY/AUGUST/SEPTEMBER '87 LEGAL SERVICE- 1241.25 -AMERICAN FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH/SEPTEMBER
'87 LEGAL SERVICE - LANDFILL 38717 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD JUNE & JULY '87 - LEGAL SERVICE 32236.2C 38718 LAW ENFORCEMENT RESOURCE CENTER FILM RENTAL - POLICE DEPT 3.0C 38719 DAVID LINDAHL POSTAGE - PLANNING DEPT 7.56 38720 FREDRICK J LE VOIR TRASH DISPOSAL - JULY STORM DAMAGE 25.0C 38721 LOUIS SEPTEMBER '87 SERVICE 7050.95 38722 LOUISVILLE LANDFILL INC DUMPING CHARGES - PARK MAINTENANCE 78.00 38723 M & I INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC BRAKE CLEANER - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 38.86 38724 MARK'S EDEN PRAIRIE AMOCO HEADLAMP - POLICE DEPT 17.95 38725 MASYS CORPORATION -NOVEMBER '87 COMPUTER miumnamma & 1050.00 SUPPORT - POLICE DEPT 38726 MIKE MARUSHIN -WRENCH SET/SOCKET SET/BULBS/HOSES/ 520.25 -UNIVERSAL/AIR COUPLER ADAPTOR/MAGNETS-
-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/WATER DEPT/WATER
PLANT ADDITION 38727 MCFARLANES INC CEMENT-DRAINAGE CONTROL/PARK MAINTENANCE . 71.30 38728 MERLINS HARDWARE HANK SAW/PILOT- EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 58.15 38729 METRO FONE COMM INC NOVEMBER '87 PAGER SERVICE 10.50 38730 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION DECEMBER '87 SEWER SERVICE 89800.90 38731 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC EXPENSES - CITY HALL & POLICE DEPT 33.63 38732 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO OXYGEN - FIRE DEPT 55.80 38733 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP -ELACKTOP-DRAINAGE CONTROL/PARK 8857.07 MAINTENANCE/PUBLIC SAFETY DEPT 38734 MINN COMM -PAGERS/NOVEMBER '87 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 613.00 FIRE DEPT 38735 MN CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 67.20 38736 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY -RECHARGE EXTINQUISHERS/4 FIRE LINE 176.80 BARRIERS-FIRE DEPT 38737 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC ADS - LIQUOR STORE 241.92 38738 MINUTEMAN PRESS PRINTING - BUILDING DEPT 124.95 38739 MODERN ELECTRIC FAN BLOWERUNIT - PARK MAINTENANCE 65.00 38740 MODERN TIRE CO -TIRE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/TIRE REPAIR- 110.22 COMMUNITY CENTER 38741 WM MUELLER & SONS INC SAND - PARK MAINTENANCE 921.67 38742 MY CHEESE SHOP EXPENSES - FIRE DEPT 7.74 38743 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE CAMERA & EQUIPMENT RENTAL - FORESTRY DEPT 225.00 38744 NATIONAL MICROFILM SUPPLY INC MICROFILM LAW - ENGINEERING DEPT 14.46 38745 NAIL OFFICE INTERIORS INC -5 DESK CHAIRS-ASSESSING DEPT/PLANNING 1257.30 DEPT & ENGINEERING DEPT 38746 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN EMPLOYMENT AD-CITY HALL 136.71 38747 BETH NIELSON SKATING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 1386.52 38748 BECKY NELSON DAY CAMP INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 1200.00 38749 JP NOREX INC SERVICE - DUCK LAKE TRAIL & mom RD 4 225.00 38750 NORTHWEST PRINTING PRINTING - ENGINEERING DEPT 116.55 38751 NORWEST BANK MPLS NA BOND PAYMENT 146314.26 38752 PAUL OHLIN SALES BATTERIES - POLICE DEPT 41.76 38753 PACE LABORATORIES INC SERVICE - WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION 883.50 38754 PARK AVE WAYZATA REFUND - OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL 1135.00 8755 PARKWAY APARTMENTS REFUND - OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL 11137.50 38756 PENNSYLVANIA OIL CO OIL - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 234.65
30859542
NOVEMBER 17,1987
38757 CATHY PERIA
38758 PETTY CASH
38759 PETTY CASH-PUBLIC SAFETY DEPT
38760 PHOTON INC
38761 PHOTOS INC
38762 PLEHAL BLACKIDPPING INC
38763 PLYMOUTH PLUMBING CO INC
38764 PMS SERVICE CORP
38765 POMMER MFG CO INC
38766 POWER BRAKE EQUIPMENT CO
38767 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
38768 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
38769 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
38770 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
8771 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
38772 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
38773 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
38774 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING
38775 PSQ BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS INC
38776 QUALITY INDUSTRIES INC
38777 R C I INDUSTRIES INC
38778 RED ROCK PARTNERSHIP
38779 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS OF MN
39780 CITY OF RICHFIELD
38781 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC
38782 ROAD RESCUE INC
38783 ROYAL COIN
9784 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO
38785 PATRICK SCHISM
7688500
MILEAGE 25.00 POSTAGE - CITY HALL
EXPENSES - PCLICE DEPT 78.05 FILM PROCESSING - ASSESSING DEPT 14.63 PRINTING - PLANNING DEPT 117.50
-BLACKTOPPING TENNIS COURTS AT HOMEWARD 25647.00 -HILLS PARK-PARK MAINTENANCE/EQUIPMENT
RENTAL-STREET MAINTENANCE
NOVEMBER '87 JANITORIAL SERVICE-CITY HALL 1160.00 1
SERVICE - HOMEWARD HILLS PARK 900.00 ,
SOFTBALL PLAQUES - ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 180.00 , -BRACKETS/TRAFFIC LIGHT LENS/STROBE LIGHT- 384.40
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
_BOLTS/WAMERS/LAOQUER THINNER/KEYS/TAPE/ 144.04 ' -BATTERIES/DUSTPAN/MOP/NAILS/ROLL PLASTER/
SCRAPERS/LIGHT BULBS-CITY HALL
-WASHERS/DRILL BITS/CARPET TAPE/CLOCK/
-BATTERIES/SCISSORS/SAFETY PLUGS-COMMUNITY
CENTER
-PADLOCKS/TRASH BAGS/TAPE/DEADLOCK/PROPANE 479.09 -PAINT/HINGES/BOLTS/PAINT PANS/PAINT
-ROLLERS/KEYS/MAGNET CLIPS/PLASTIC SHEET-
-ING/ROPE/CHISEL/DRILL BITS/HAMMER/SPIKES/
-NAILS/PLEXIGLASS/LEVEL/BATTERIES/SHELF
HOOKS & BRACKETS/HEATER-PARKS DEPT
-KEYS/KEY HOLDER/CLEANING SUPPLIES - 13.84
PUBLIC SAFETY
-GLOVES/ROPE/TAPE/PLIERS/CLAMPS/WRENCH SET 95.45 CLIPS-SEWER DEPT
-TOWEL HOLDER/PAPER PRODUCTS/MAP/HOOKS/ 97.25 -KEYS/COUPLINGS/WRENCHES/TAPE/CEMENT/CHAIN
CHAIN LINKS-STREET MAINTENANCE
-CLEANING SUPPLIES/HACK SAW/NUTS/BOLTS/ 166.78 -CABLES/CLAMPS/STEEL WOOL/KEYS/LIGHT BULBS/
-GARBAGE BAGS/PIPE WRENCH/LEVEL/TOOL SET-
WATER DEPT
PRINTING - PLANNING DEPT 498.20 -SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 87 MAINTENANCE 1465.50 AGREEMENT-CITY HALL
PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT - PARK DEPT 197.51 CLEANING SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT 64.77 -REFUND BALANCE DUE FOR OVERSIZED WATER- 625.63 WATERMAIN-RED ROCK HEIGHTS
CASH REGISTER TAPE - LIQUOR STORE 48.96 4TH QUARTER '87 DISPATCH SERVICE 19910.91 -SERVICE-PRAIRIE VIEW DRIVE/HIDDEN GLEN 23254.83 -3RD ADDITION/13LOSSUM ROADWAY/BENNETT
PLACE/SHADY OAK RIDGE
-RESCUE ROPE/DISPOSABLE GLOVES/MINI FIRST
403.12 RESPONDER KIT-FIRE DEPT
-EXPENSES FOR SPECIAL EVENT - COMMUNITY
300.00 CENTER
-2 DESKS $219.50 EACH/STAPES - COMMUNITY
453.22 CENTER/POLICE DEPT & CITY HALL
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
105.00
45.02
C.
NOVEMBER 17,1987
38786 SCHMITT MUSIC CENTERS
38787 SCHMIDT READY MIX INC
38788 RICK SHOEN
38789 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO
38790 SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM INC
38791 SEXTON PRINTING INC
38792 SHAKOPEE FORD INC
38793 STEVEN R SINELL
38794 W GORDON SMITH CO
38795 SNAP CG TOOLS CORP
38796 SNAP PRINT INC
38797 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC
38798 SOUTHWEST AUTO SUPPLY INC
38799 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
38800 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
n 1801 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
' _A3802 TREASURER STATE OF MINNESOTA
38803 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE
38804 STS CONSULTANTS LTD
38805 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
38806 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
38807 SUN ELECTRIC CORPORATION
38808 SUPPLEE ENTERPRISES INC
33809 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC
38810 TARGET 220
38811 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC
38812 TURNQUIST PAPER CO
38813 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
38814 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
38815 US WEST CELLULAR INC
38816 UNITED WAY MINNEAPOLIS
38817 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICES
38818 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC
38819 LARISSA UZZELL
38820 VESSCO INC
'9821 VOLK CUSTOM WELDING INC
.58822 KARI WAHL
3906284
SHEET MUSIC - COMMUNITY SERVICES
14.50 BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE &
450.78 HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
49.50 CARPET - COMMUNITY CENTER
50.00 SEPTEMBER '87 SERVICE - COMMUNITY CENTER
15219.43 PRINTING FALL BROCHURE-COMMUNITY aunTR
3726.91 HEADLIGHT LENS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
42.67 MILEAGE
187.15 -CLEANING SUPPLIE/CONNECTORS/SEL-$2482.00
4778.59 -TRANSMISSION GREASE/OIL/TAIL LIGHTS/
-ENGINE MOUNT/VOLTAGE REGULATOR/WHEEL
-CYLINDERS/BRAKE PARTS/COIL-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE/COMMUNITY CENTER/FIRE DEPT
DRILL BITS/SOCKETS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 82.31 PRINTING-SENIOR CENTER 150.83 SUPPLIES - POLICE DEPT 25.05 -BATTERIES/GREASE GUN/HOSES/CORES/ 4007.41 -CARBURETOR/WELDING RODS/PAINT SPRAYER/
-WATER PUMP/SEALS/FILTERS/TIRE VALVE/
-CLUTCH/BEARINGS/BUSHINGS/FLYWHEEL/SPARK
-PLUGS/WIRE/IGNITION/WHEEL CYLINDERS/
-VALVE CORE/CABLE/EXHAUST SYSTEM/DISC
-PADS/ANTIFREEZE TESTERS/BATTERY TESTER/
-FLOOR MATS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/SEWER
DEPT
LEGAL ADS 3395.16 ADS - LIQUOR STORE 243.20
EMPLOYMENT ADS - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 66.20 WATER TESTS-WATER DEPT 399.77 EQ -HOLSTERS/AMMUNITION POUCHES-POLICE DEPT/ 755.15 2 FEDERAL SIGNAL KITS-FIRE DEPT
SERVICE - WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDITION 813.52 -ROTOR/DISTRIBUTOR CAP/WIRE/SEAL ASSEMBLY/ 143.34 REPAIRED SHIFTER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
2ND HALF '87 MEMBERSHIP DUES 700.00 -INSTALLED COMPUTER PROGRAM/REPAIRED 489.60 PRIMER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
SUPPLIES - LIQUOR STORE 12.32 FILM RENTAL - COMMUNITY CENTER 217.50 FOCI SUPPLIES - COMMUNITY CENTER 66.30 -DRAFTING SUPPLIES - PLANNING DEPT& 228.77 COMMUNITY CENTER
PAPER TOWELS - PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 95.40 OXYGEN - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 17.99 UNIFORMS - FIRE DEPT 598.00 SERVICE 150.05 UNITED WAY VOLUNTEER MEETING E(PENSE 90.00 UNIFORMS FOR CITY EMPLOYEES 1321.30 -WELDING SPOOLS/CLEVIS PINS-EQUIPMENT 137.10 MAINTENANCE
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 40.00 LEAD GASKETS-WATER DEPT 97.79 -REMOVE & REPLACE TUBE & SPINDLE ON TREE 150.00 SPADE - FORESTRY DEPT
MILEAGE
49.25
F
NOVEMBER 17,1987
38823 KEITH WALL
38824 WATER PRODUCTS OD
38825 LYNNETTE WEISGRAM
38826 WESTERN DESIGN & PRINTING
38827 WILSON TANNER GRAPHICS
38828 WISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN
38829 WOODLAKE SANITARY SERVICE INC
38830 XEROX CORP
38831 YOUNESTEDTS INC
38832 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
38833 EARL ZENT
38834 ZEP MANUFACTURING CO
38835 ZIEGLER INC
38836 KAY ZUCCARO
38837 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN
18838 WARD F DAHLBERG
J8839 ERA RELOCATION CENTER
38840 FIRST SECURITY TITLE
38841 ALAN GRAY
38842 HANS HAGEN
38843 HENNEPIN CTY CHIEFS OF POLICE
38844 ISIBAN KISH
38845 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD
38846 MULLIGAN TREE SERVICE
38847 OAK PARK BUSINESS CENTER
38848 GORDON OLSCN
38849 DAVID OSBORNE
38850 PERSONNEL JOURNAL
38851 DAVID PRINTUP
38852 EXEC PROP
38853 FRANK SAARANEN
38854 CHARLES SEABURG
38855 MELTON WALLACE
38856 CLIFFORD WIESE
38857 XEROX CORP
38858 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC
38859 MN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
38860 VOID OUT CHECK
5674078
EXPENSES - POLICE DEPT
-GASKET PVC PIPE/6 1" 1000 GAL METER
$738.00/METER CONNEM4 $120.96/
-270 5/8 x 3/4 100 GAL METER $12390.30/
-270 #2 COPPERHORN $3537.00/ 2 2" lUu GAL
METER $836.00/ 1 1/2 1000 GAL METER $1180.00
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
BUSINESS CARDS - POLICE DEPT
-BUSINESS CARDS/LETTERHEAD/INFORMATION
oartIghiNG LABELS/LEAF FLYERS/PURCHASE
SY LANDSCAPING - PLANNING DEPT
SERVICE - LEAF RECYCLING
-SEPTEMBER 1 87 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT -
POLICE DEPT
-WHEEL ALIGNMENT/8 TIRES &473.12/ 4 TIRES
-$151.08/4 TIRE RIME $159.80-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
FIRST AID SUPPLIES-CITY HALL & WATER DEPT
RELOCATION EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES
CLEANING SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-FLASHER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/ENGINE
REPAIRS AT WELL #6 - WATER DEPT
AQUA AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
SUBSCRIPTION - PLANNING DEPT
OCTOBER '87 EXPENSES - LIQUOR
REFUND - OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL
REFUND - OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL
DUES/EXPENSES - ENGINEERING DEPT
DUES/EXPENSES - ENGINEERING DEPT
CONFERENCE - POLICE DEPT
REFUND - OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL
MAY '87 LEGAL SERVICE - COMMUNITY CENTER
REFUND - WATER METER DEPOSIT
REFUND - OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL
REFUND - OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL
REFUND - OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL
SUBSCRIPTION- HUMAN RESOURCES
REFUND - OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL
REFUND- OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL
REFUND - OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL
REFUND - OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL
REFUND - WATER METER DEPOSIT
REFUND - OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL
SERVICE
-ROCK-STREET DEPT/PARK DEPT/JULY STORM
DAMAGE
FOoD HANDLERS APPLICATION - LIQUOR
8.00
19472.26
40.00
65.00
1247.00
4500.00
4170.00
94.00
900.95
93.30
500.00
571.55
1941.03
290.00
25.00
80.00
34.53
10.20
180.00
200.00
380.00
18.27
16342.05
43.68
2151.70
24.00
26.35
45.00
40.98
37.71
55.25
97.48
268.47
30.33
90.00
2613.69
53.00
0.00
$1629750.54
DISTRIBUTIONS BY FUND
13 gEgglicATE OF INDEBT
15 LIQUOR sToRE—p v M 70809.18
17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE
31 PARK ACQuisT & DEVELOP
33 UTILITY BoND FUND
36 P/S & P/W 8010 FUND
3986 FIRE sTATIoN oONSTRucr
44 UTILITY DEBT FUND
45 UTILITY DEBT FD ARB
51 IMPROVEMENT ComsT FD
52 IMPROVEMENT DEBT FUND
55 IMPROVEMENT DEBT FUND ARB 36751.25
57 ROAD IMPROVEMENT OONsT FD 3542.45
7 3 WATER FUND 101688.58
77 SEWER FUND 91402.71
81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 8123.92
$1629750.54
43870.67
60869.21
343979.70
314.44
160.68
146214.45
109517.80
284240.84
—77.97
.Z492 1-1
!NAN !instruction company
MI W4CPONATD
November 17, 1987
Mr. Chris Enger
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55343
RE: PRESERVE VILLAGE CENTER
Dear Chris:
In reference to the above mentioned shopping center, the following items were
contracted or completed since the last council meeting:
1) An electrician inspected every outdoor light. Shields were installed
on all back lights to prevent direct light into resident homes.
2) A portion of the fence was repaired, the Contract has been let for
the remaining repairs by Dick Gibson.
Ryan Construction Company and Jerry's Super Valu has reviewed the supplement
to Developer's Agreement and agree with this, but feel somewhat uncomfortable
with this decision lying solely at the City's discretion. We would feel more
comfortable with a clarification that the City would not be arbitrarily
capricious in its decision to rescind 24-hour operation where we used due
dilligence in attempting to cure a problem.
Very truly yours,
RYAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
WMM:dsn
CC: Bill McHale
Bob Shadduck, Jerry's Super Valu
Edina, Minnesota
700 INTERNATIONAL CENTRE. 900 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE 612/339-9847
residential properties, traffic, as well as any other
conditions it may determine to be appropriate and of impact.
B. If, after the one-year period of monitoring, City
determines, in its sole discretion, that the twenty-four-
hour operation may continue, City may impose such controls,
remedies, and/or procedures for continuing review as City,
in its sole discretion, shall deem necessary.
C. If, after the one-year period of monitoring, City
determines, by its sole discretion, that the twenty-four-
hour operation should cease, City shall notify Owner in
writing of said determination. Owner shall have fourteen
days from the date of the written notification to
discontinue the twenty-four-hour operation and shall return
to the original hours of business agreed to in the August 7,
1979, Developer's Agreement, that is 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
for the grocery store to be open to the public.
2. Ryan Construction of Minnesota agrees to all of the terms and conditions and
accepts the obligations of the "Owner" under the Developer's Agreement, as
amended and supplemented herein.
WHEREFORE, the parties hereto have executed this Supplement to Developer's
Agreement the day and year first above written.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Jerry's Super Value
SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
This Supplement to Developer's Agreement made and entered into as of this
day of , 1987, by and Ryan Construction of Minnesota,
Inc., a Minnesota corporation, Owner and Developer of the of the property as
described in the developer's agreement between Ryan Construction Company of
Minnesota, a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, for Super Value at
County Road #18 and Anderson Lakes Parkway, dated August 7, 1979, hereinafter
"Developer's Agreement," and the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "City;"
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend said agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties thereto as follows:
1. The Developer's Agreement shall be and hereby is supplemented and amended by
deleting existing Paragraph 9. and inserting the following as Paragraph 9:
Owner shall not, and shall not permit others to, deliver, or pick up
from the shopping center existing on the property, any goods,
Inventory, refuse, garbage, or other materials between the hours of
11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m., except pick up by customers during business
hours and necessary standard maintenance such as snow removal.
The grocery store may be open to the public for business for twenty-
four hours per day for a period of one year from the date first
mentioned above in this Supplement to Developer's Agreement, subject
to the following conditions:
A. City will monitor the twenty-four-hour operation and utilize
observations made to determine whether the twenty-four-hour
operation shall be allowed to continue beyond the period of
one year.
City may, during said monitoring activities, consider review
of the maintenance of the shopping center property, the
impact of light, noise, and debris on the surrounding
conditions it may determine to be appropriate and of impact.
B. If, after the one-year period of monitoring, City determines, in its sole discretion, that the twenty-four-
hour operation may continue, City may impose such controls,
remedies, and/or procedures for continuing review as City,
in its sole discretion, shall deem necessary.
C. If, after the one-year period of monitoring, City
determines, by its sole discretion, that the twenty-four-
hour operation should cease, City shall notify Owner in
writing of said determination. Owner shall have fourteen
days from the date of the written notification to
discontinue the twenty-four-hour operation and shall return
to the original hours of business agreed to in the August 7,
1979, Developer's Agreement, that is 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
for the grocery store to be open to the public.
2. Ryan Construction of Minnesota agrees to all of the terms and cond
i
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
accepts the obligations of the "Owner" under the Developer's Agr
e
e
m
e
n
t
,
a
s
amended and supplemented herein.
WHEREFORE, the parties hereto have executed this Supplement to
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
'
s
Agreement the day and year first above written.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before
me this day of
9
M E M
DATE: 11/5/87
TO: Carl Jullie
FROM: Jim Clark
THRU: Keith Wall
SUBJECT: ACTIVITY ANALYSIS OF NEIGHBORHOOD MALLS
Per your request Records Supervisor Annette Beach and I
reviewed statistical data concerning three neighborhood
malls; Preserve Village Mall, Prairie Village Mall, and
Prairie View Mall (Rainbow Foods).
For the purposes of this report we reviewed the Police
activity at these malls for the first three months of 1987.
This data appears to be consistent throughout the year.
This was a period of time (known to us) when Driskills
Super Valu and Rainbow Foods were both open 24 hours per day.
During this period we found the following information,
which is also displayed on the attached graph.
SERVICE CALLS
CRIMES & CITATIONS
PRESERVE VILLAGE MALL 28 17
PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL 26 8
PRAIRIE VIEW MALL
20
5
service calls include lockouts, medicals, fires, suspicious
persons, ect.
crimes and citations are not reflected in service calls
As you can see, during this period of time, it appears
as though there is no direct relationship between crime
reported and a 24 hour operation. In fact it appears to be
Inverse in relationship, which may suggest that other factors
such as location, physical security, and management attitude
may play a part in determination of vulnerability to crime
rather than hours of operation.
This study reflects only reported crime. Consequently
one of the reasons for the difference (reflected in higher
numbers) between Preserve Village Mall and the other two
Malls is that Jerry's Super Valu has employed security to
detect and apprehend shoplifters.
Between the hours of 11:00PM and 6:00AM the following
calls were answered at the two 24 hour Mails
Prairie View Mall (Rainbow) 2 Service Calls
Prairie Village Mall 5 Service Calls and 1 Crime (felony
theft)
D_
OD
0 0 •
171\
oy\w‘v‘v1/2.\1
\\\\"\\"\\I \\M 5
LU
0 tr)
LO 010187 THRU 033187 VIEW MALL 'RESERVE VILLAGE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #87-309
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF KADA, INC., ADDITION FOR
KARP'S TWIN CITY SUPPLY COMPANY
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Kada, Inc., Addition for Karp's Twin City Supply
Company, dated September 25, 1987, consisting of 4.1 acres into 1 lot, a copy of
which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions
of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is
herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 1st day of December, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John O. Frane, City Clerk
- L AREA LOCATION MAP
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Planning Staff
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
October 23, 1987
Kada Incorporated Addition
North of Highway #5, south of Martin Drive, west of Mitchell Road
Karp's Twin City Supply Company
Preliminary Plat of 4.1 acres into one lot.
Background
This 4.1-acre area was zoned 1-2 in
1969 and is the existing location of
Karp's Twin City Supply Company.
The platting request is in response
to a building expansion plan under
review at this time.
Preliminary Plat
The existing 2.6-acre parcel, prior
to this building expansion request,
was developed at a 27.7% Floor Area
Ratio (FAR). Plans for the ex-
pansion would increase the site's
FAR to 31%, exceeding the Code
maximum of 30% in the 1-2 District.
At this time, the proponent is
requesting the preliminary platting
of the remaining 1.5 acres located
to the west to be combined with the
existing 2.6 acres in order to meet
the FAR requirements. After
platting, the site FAR will be 19.6%
with the expansion. Since the
additional 1.5 acres of platted
property will not be built upon at
this time, Staff would recommend
that any future expansion for this
property be reviewed and approved by
the Planning Commission and City
Council.
Kada Incorporated Addition 2 October 23, 1987
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has reviewed the
p
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
p
l
a
t
request and has indicated to Staff that no additional Highway righ
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
w
i
l
l
b
e
necessary for expansion of Trunk Highway #5. MnDOT is now in
t
h
e
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
o
f
determining right-of-way needs for future Highway #212. At this
t
i
m
e
t
h
e
y
d
o
n
o
t
know the extent of right-of-way needs for this property. However
,
M
n
D
O
T
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
that the needs should not affect the taking of any structures on th
i
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall revise the pl
a
t
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
standard drainage and utility easements around the property.
Site Plan
The expansion plans for this property include the removal of a small
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
building to be replaced by a 4,500 square foot freezer addition, 31
f
e
e
t
i
n
h
e
i
g
h
t
.
City Code allows up to 40 feet for structure height with an 1-2
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
.
A
l
l
setbacks and amount of parking spaces required are in conformance w
i
t
h
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
.
No land alteration is to take place with this addition.
Architecture
The proposed addition is to be constructed with white pre-finishe
d
m
e
t
a
l
panels.
The existing structure is constructed with white embossed concrete b
l
o
c
k
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
allows a maximum of 25% of a building's exterior finish to be com
p
r
i
s
e
d
o
f
m
e
t
a
l
within an 1-2 District. Staff has calculated a total of 29% metal
u
s
e
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
proposed plans. The proponent has indicated that they will be revis
i
n
g
t
h
e
p
l
a
n
s
t
o
meet the Code requirement. Construction plans also indicate the
u
s
e
o
f
e
x
p
o
s
e
d
concrete block along the north and west elevations. City Code doe
s
n
o
t
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
h
e
use of plain concrete block as an exterior material. Only
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
u
n
i
t
s
decoratively treated with a texture may be used (i.e., rock face b
l
o
c
k
,
b
r
e
a
k
-
o
f
f
block, double-scored block, etc.). Prior to Council review, propon
e
n
t
s
h
a
l
l
r
e
v
i
s
e
plans indicating the use of a decorative type block.
The proponent has indicated that the major mechanical units for
t
h
e
n
e
w
f
r
e
e
z
e
r
addition will be located within the structure which should control
a
n
y
u
n
i
t
n
o
i
s
e
,
as exists with the McGlynn's mechanical equipment. In addition
,
t
h
e
m
e
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
equipment screening plan indicates additional rooftop units. Thes
e
u
n
i
t
s
,
a
n
d
a
l
l
existing units, are proposed to be screened with wood materials. C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
the units to be screened with materials architecturally integral wi
t
h
t
h
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
.
Since a dominant view of the building will be the new freezer ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
S
t
a
f
f
recommends that screening for the mechanical units be constructed wit
h
p
r
e
-
f
i
n
i
s
h
e
d
metal panel to be consistent with the Code requirement.
The freezer addition will include one new loading facility door which
w
i
l
l
f
a
c
e
t
h
e
interior of the lot.
Landscaoing
A landscaping plan of Marshall Ash trees has been provided which me
e
t
s
t
h
e
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
caliper inch requirement based on the expansion plans. The majori
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
t
r
e
e
s
have been placed along the south property line in order to downpla
y
t
h
e
h
e
i
g
h
t
o
f
the proposed structure. In addition, some landscaping has been l
o
c
a
t
e
d
n
e
a
r
t
h
e
site entrance in order to help screen the additional loading faci
l
i
t
y
d
o
o
r
.
A
l
l
trees proposed along the south property line should be shifted furth
e
r
t
o
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
in order to anticipate the future Highway #2I2 right-of-way needs.
Kada Incorporated Addition 3 October 23, 1987
Staff has observed for quite some time the use of the extreme southern parking area
for temporary parking of semi-trailers. Though this parking may not be considered
outside storage because of its transient nature, the City Code requires that all
parking areas be screened from public roadways. The proponent shall revise the
landscape plan to demonstrate effective screening of the parking area from Highway
#5. The use of berms, landscaping, fencing, or a combination thereof should be
explored.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the request for Preliminary Plat of
approximately 4.1 acres into one lot, based on plans dated September 12, 1987,
subject to the Staff Report dated October 23, 1987, and subject to the following
conditions:
1. Prior to Council review, the proponent shall:
A. Revise the plat to include standard drainage and utility easements
around the property.
B. Revise the building elevations to include a decorative type concrete
block in lieu of the plain concrete block. In addition, revise the
elevations to indicate a maximum use of metal not to exceed 25% of
the structure.
C. Revise the rooftop mechanical screening plan for existing and
proposed units demonstrating the use of pre-finished metal as the
main screening element.
D. Revise the landscape plan to provide effective screening of the
parking area from Highway #5. Also, shift the plantings along the
south property line further to the north in anticipation of future
Highway #212 right-of-way needs.
2. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Submit building material samples and colors for review and site
lighting details.
3. Prior to any building expansion on the remainder of the property, the plans
for such expansion will be required to be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Commission and City Council.
Eden Prairie Planning Commission October 26, 1987 - Page Three
B. KADA, INC., ADDITION, by Karp's Twin City Supply Company.
Request for Preliminary Platting of 4.1 acres into 1 lot.
Location: North of Highway #5, south of Martin Drive, west
of Mitchell Road. A public hearing.
Modris Fedders, representing the proponent, stated the projec
t
i
s
a very simple addition to an existing building. They will
demolish part of the existing structure and replace with a 4,
5
0
0
Eden Prairie Planning Commission -
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
6
,
1
9
8
7
- Page Four
square foot freezer addition, 31 fee
t
i
n
h
e
i
g
h
t
.
T
h
e
y
h
a
v
e
m
e
t
with City Staff and will incorporate
a
l
l
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
the Staff Report.
The proponent indicated that the mecha
n
i
c
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
n
e
w
freezer will be located within the st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
w
h
i
c
h
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
any unit noise. The mechanical roofto
p
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
u
n
i
t
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
screened with metal panel in accordanc
e
w
i
t
h
c
o
d
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Also, the addition will include one ne
w
l
o
a
d
i
n
g
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
d
o
o
r
which will face the interior of the lot.
Dram noted that with this addition, pr
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
w
i
l
l
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
t
h
e
parking area from Highway #5 to demons
t
r
a
t
e
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
with berms, landscaping, fencing or a
c
o
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
t
h
e
r
e
o
f
.
Acting Chairman Hallett stated that t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
w
i
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
better situation than we have at pres
e
n
t
.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by
B
y
e
t
o
c
l
o
s
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
hearing.
Motion carried 5-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by
B
y
e
t
o
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
t
o
C
i
t
y
Council approval of the request of Kar
p
'
s
t
w
i
n
C
i
t
y
S
u
p
p
l
y
Company for Preliminary Plat of 4.1 ac
r
e
s
i
n
t
o
o
n
e
l
o
t
,
t
o
b
e
known as Kada, Inc., Addition, based o
n
p
l
a
n
s
d
a
t
e
d
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
25, 1987, subject to the recommendatio
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
dated October 23, 1987.
Motion carried 5-0-0
. • .
FINAL REPORT
RESIDENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
November 1987
Since October 1987, a group of 24 residents of Eden Prairie has studied ways
to address the community's need for a future City Hall. This time has allowed
for thoughtful discussion among Committee members after gaining the benefits
of professional services from a market research firm, an architect, and a
property appraiser.
The City of Eden Prairie is a substantial "business". It has revenues of
$25 million annually, fixed assets in excess of $80 million, and nearly 200
permanent staff positions. The revenue and staff figures put Eden Prairie in
the same range as companies such as Research, Inc. Eden Prairie as a
corporation will continue to grow, and its corporate headquarters -- City
Hall -- needs to be planned with that growth in mind.
When forming the Committee, the City Council developed the following charge to
the committee:
"The Eden Prairie City Council seeks an independent, informA
recommendation from the community about the best way to address the City's
need for permanent administrative offices. It is appointing a 24-member
blue-ribbon committee to investigate this matter. The committee will be
free and is encouraged to explore a wide array of solutions; however, it
will not contemplate any options which entail leasing office space. In
considering sites for new City offices, the committee shall have no
restrictions on the location of a site it will recommend. The committee
will recommend whether the building should be built in phases or initially
constructed to its eventual size. It will identify appropriate costs for
construction of the building. Finally, the committee will recommend
whether this construction should be financed with bonds authorized by
referendum or within legal restraints if a referendum is not held.
"In its desire to have the committee operate independently, the Council
will not have its members nor its staff participate in the committee's
activities. The City Manager shall, however, assign one member of his
staff to perform liaison duties for the committee. If the committee
determines that it needs additional resources which may involve expenses.
it may request that the Council authorize payment for these services."
.;;J:)0
-2-
SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS
With this charge, the Committee considered a variety of issues, facts, and
alternatives. Following is a summary of the major recommendations:
1. A NEW CITY HALL SHOULD BE BUILT AND READY FOR OCCUPANCY IN MARCH, 1993.
The current lease arrangement at Executive Drive is an acceptable City
Hall until that time. This recommendation allows the City to exercise its
option for a 3-year extension of the original 3-year lease. The terms and
facility seem reasonable, and extending the lease allows the City to
realize maximum return on its leasehold improvement investments and to
accumulate financing for the future City Hall.
2. A BUILDING FUND SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED TO FINANCE THE NEW CITY HALL. The
committee feels this approach is preferable to a referendum and general
obligation bonds. The City knows of its future needs, has the
responsibility to prepare a prudent plan, and has resources available for
this purpose. Approximately half of new city halls built recently were
built without a referendum. The savings realized are substantial --
because no interest will be paid. Total costs should be in the range of
$4.5 to $5.3 million, and .6 mill annually will provide adequate funding.
3. LAND SHOULD BE ACQUIRED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. Three sites are recommended
for Council consideration. Each meets the criteria set forth by the
Committee. The Council should negotiate on these sites to achieve the
best possible purchase -- at the earliest possible date. Five to eight
acres of developable land is needed.
4. THE BUILDING SHOULD BE FUNCTIONAL AND REFLECT THE PUBLIC NATURE OF ITS
USE. It should blend reasonably well with surrounding buildings and
conditions. It should not be ostentatious. The design should allow for
future expansion if it is needed. A two-story City Hall with
approximately 40,000 square feet is needed. The cost should be
approximately $70/square foot (in 1986 construction costs).
PROCESS
In October 1986 the City Council named four persons to serve as the nucleus
for a citizens committee to advise in planning and financing for a new City
Hall. These four comprised the executive committee for the planning process:
Rich Anderson, Gene Haberman, Marty Jessen and Jean Myers. The Executive
Committee "nominated" 12 members to serve on the Committee based on
representation from various segments of the community. Eight other persons
who had written the Council regarding their desire to participate also were
appointed. The 24 members of the committee were:
-3-
Executive Committee
Rich Anderson
Jean Myers Gene Haberman
Marty Jessen
Committee Membership
Rod Anderson
Tom Bierman
Ann Boline
David Bowers
Pat Breitenstein
Ken Brooks
Betty Craig
Dennis Dirlam
Harlan Fritz
Merle Gamm
Mike Gust
John Hartsough
Fred Hoisington
Steve Hoyt
Jerry LaBarre
Jim Ostenson
Jim Rannow
Paul Redpath
Lyle Shaw
Dave Spaulding
Two members of the Committee were unable to continue
o
n
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
;
G
e
n
e
Haberman accepted a job out of state, and Betty Cr
a
i
g
f
o
u
n
d
h
e
r
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
t
o
o
busy. Meetings of the full Committee had excellen
t
a
t
t
e
n
d
a
n
c
e
,
a
v
e
r
a
g
i
n
g
1
4
to 18 per meeting.
The broad scope of the Committee's work quickly b
e
c
a
m
e
a
p
p
a
r
e
n
t
.
I
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
manage the work, subcommittees were established.
S
u
b
c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
c
h
a
r
g
e
s
a
n
d
reporting dates were designed and sequenced to bui
l
d
u
p
o
n
t
h
e
w
o
r
k
o
f
preceding committees. In this manner, the work pr
o
g
r
e
s
s
e
d
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
l
y
,
w
i
t
h
each new piece using the information and consensus
w
h
i
c
h
h
a
d
b
e
e
n
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
among the full Committee. Each member of the Comm
i
t
t
e
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
o
n
a
subcommittee, and each subcommittee had at least o
n
e
m
e
m
b
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
e
x
e
c
u
t
i
v
e
committee.
The subcommittees were:
1. Inventory of Other City Halls: This subcommittee conducted a survey of selected suburbs to determine why various communit
i
e
s
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
a
n
d
located their City Halls the way they did. They a
l
s
o
f
o
u
n
d
w
h
a
t
t
y
p
e
s
o
f
services were offered, and how much building space
h
a
d
b
e
e
n
b
u
i
l
t
t
o
provide them.
2. Other Governmental Services: This subcommittee investigated the possibility (and probability) of locating additiona
l
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
(
e
.
g
.
,
Hennepin County, U.S. Postal Service) with a new Cit
y
H
a
l
l
.
3. Survey: This subcommittee was charged with conducting a s
u
r
v
e
y
o
f
residents to determine what they expected of a Cit
y
H
a
l
l
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
.
A
n
d
what concerns they had when they voted (or did not
v
o
t
e
)
a
t
t
h
e
referendum.
4. Program for the City Hall: This group used the results of the previous
three subcommittees work to write a description of
t
h
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
and facilities) for the City Hall. It studied the e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
,
a
r
r
a
n
g
e
-
ment, and public use of the space.
-4-
5. Site Selection/Building Design: Using the program statement, this group
identified and evaluated potential sites, and developed a concept plan
for the site.
6. Finance and Implementation: This subcommittee explored funding
alternatives for the new City Hall. It also addressed such implementation
issues as the use of referendum, timing for funding programs, and timing
of property acquisition and building occupancy.
Each subcommittee submitted a draft report to the full Committee for review.
All final reports were approved by the full Committee. These reports appear
In the following chapters.
It has been a pleasure serving the community in this important effort. We
believe the recommendations are sound and will serve Eden Prairie well.
On behalf of the Committee.
Marty Jessen
CHAPTER I
INVENTORY OF OTHER CITY HALLS
Chair:
Jim Ostenson
Members:
Ann Boline, David Bowers, Mike Gust,
John Hartsough, Jean Myers
This subcommittee contacted staff members of ten suburban communities
and asked eight general questions. The committees selected were
comparable to Eden Prairie in terms of its maturity or what it may
become. A summary of the research about what these communities have
done and what they would do differently appears on the next two pages.
To: Residents Advisory Committee on City Administrative
Offices
From: Inventory of Other City Halls Sub-Committee
Date: January 14, 1987
This committee was charged with conducting a selective
inventory of what other cities have built as city halls
and why. Accordingly, we selected several suburbs that
we felt were comparable with Eden Prairie in terms of maturity
or communities that were more established from which we
might learn. The following communities were selected:
Maple Grove
Minnetonka
St. Louis Park
Brooklyn Center
Woodbury
Eagan
Bloomington
Edina
Coon Rapids
Plymouth
While it is difficult to form definite conclusions from
our research, we were able to acknowledge the following
facts.
Population verses size of City Hall: Population of the Communities surveyed ranged from 16,000 to 80,000. The
majority of the communities were between 31,000 to 45,000.
While the size of the City Hall structure was not always
able to be identified, they generally ranged from 15,000
to 40,000 square feet and contained approximately 100 employees.
City Services Located Within the City Hall: The majority of City Halls contain all administrative offices and eight
of the communities also had their police department within
the City Hall building. Several of the communities had
their fire department administrative offices located inside.
Repeatedly, it was mentioned that it is important to have
as many functions under one roof as possible. The people
interviewed felt that it was important for the different
departments to have convenient access to each other (i.e.,
the fire department working with the building department).
City Services Contained Outside City Hall: The two services most frequently located outside were a fire department
and public works.
Location of City Hall: The majority of the City Halls
were located within the geographic center of the community.
Those that were not, were located near the business district
or on a main street.
Page two
Other Services in the City Hall: None of the communities
interviewed had other services, outside of city services,
located within their City Hall building. Several of the
communities had libraries near by, a police station next
door or future hopes for an adjacent post office.
Recommended Changes or Improvements: The need for better
space utilization seemed to be a common complaint. Too
often the City Halls were built too small or did not allow
for an easy flow of communication between various departments.
The need for storage was usually under estimated and the
potential need for expansion was not addressed.
ijr
CHAPTER II
OTHER GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES
Co-Chairs: Pat Breitenstein, Paul Redpath
Members: Rod Anderson, Betty Craig, Harlan Fritz,
Marty Jessen
This subcommittee reviewed what services are "typically" available in
other city halls. Members also explored the feasibility of a post
office or post office contract station, deputy registrar, Hennepin
County service center, County and State park information and services,
university extension courses, and county extension agents and
programs.
Discussion among Subcommittee and Committee members concluded that
housing as many of the City's services as possible under one roof was
desirable. Other services which the City may consider adding would be
a deputy registrar (vehicle licensing) and a contract postal station.
While the Subcommittee started with the concept of combining all of
the services described into one community service office, the idea of
a public service center is not feasible because the U.S. Postal
Service will build an Eden Prairie office within a few years and the
County has no plans for service centers in addition to those at the
Government Center, Brookdale, Ridgedale, and Southdale. Planning for
a City Hall building and site should be focused just on the needs of
the City organization.
CHAPTER III
SURVEY
Chair:
Gene Haberman
Members:
Tom Bierman, Ken Brooks, John Hartsough, Jim Rannow
The Executive Committee believed it was important to understand
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
'
s
sentiments and expectations of a City Hall. The full Committee
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
t
h
a
t
a survey would be a valuable tool in gaining this understandi
n
g
.
M
a
j
o
r
components of the survey were to be: 1) attitude about governm
e
n
t
;
2
)
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
;
and 3) the image of the building as needing to be a major cente
r
o
r
a
n
o
f
f
i
c
e
facility. The focus was to be more forward-looking in terms of
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
for a new City Hall, rather than to be bogged down in determini
n
g
w
h
a
t
w
e
n
t
wrong on the referendum.
City Council granted a request for funds to retain the services
o
f
a
m
a
r
k
e
t
survey/research firm to conduct the survey. Subcommittee member
s
c
h
o
s
e
T
K
Associates of Minneapolis, Inc. for the work. During January 1
9
8
7
,
3
0
0
residents of Eden Prairie were contacted through a random teleph
o
n
e
s
u
r
v
e
y
,
1
5
0
of whom were known to have voted on the referendum. The sample
y
i
e
l
d
e
d
a
9
5
percent confidence level for the results.
Based on the data and analysis provided by the firm, the subcommi
t
t
e
e
a
n
d
committee drew the following conclusions:
I. There is a need for a new City Hall.
2. At this time, residents are not frequent users of City Hall but
t
h
e
y
are satisfied with the quality of service received when they hav
e
u
s
e
d
It.
3. Perhaps because of their infrequent usage, residents are not ove
r
l
y
concerned with the location of City Hall.
4. Residents do not perceive a strong need to add services by other
governmental agencies and clearly do not see a need for an audit
o
r
i
u
m
as a possible addition to City Hall.
5. Residents felt strongly that a new City Hall need not be highl
y
v
i
s
i
b
l
e
and distinct but should blend in with the surroundings.
6. A majority of residents feel that city government will change
a
n
d
g
r
o
w
In the future through the addition of staff to provide service
s
t
o
m
e
e
t
general and specific needs, as well as the overall growth of s
t
a
f
f
t
o
accommodate existing services. Therefore, building design shou
l
d
b
e
flexible and expandable.
7. Residents expect a thorough cost-benefit analysis to be perform
e
d
o
n
a
l
l
perspective locations and building plans. A bias exists toward
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
already owned by the City.
8. Residents perceive that the last referendum was poorly planned
a
n
d
marketed.
A copy of the full report, including an interesting compilation
o
f
r
e
s
p
n
s
e
s
t
o
open-ended questions, is stored in the City Manager's Office. T
h
e
e
x
e
c
u
t
i
v
e
summary of the consultant's report appears on the next two pages.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A total of 300 telephone interviews were conducted with
adult residents of the City of Eden Prairie: 150 with a
systematic random sample of residents who voted in the May
6, 1986 referendum and 150 with a random sample of the
general population.
Two-thirds of the respondents have lived in Eden Prairie for
over five years; eight in ten live in single family homes;
and, over nine in ten own their homes.
Just over half of the respondents were female; almost two-
thirds are aged 31 to 50; and 95% reported that they are
registered to vote.
Over ninety percent of the respondents have been to Eden
Prairie City Hall at some time, and almost all of these
residents reported that they were very or somewhat satisfied
with the service they received on their last visit.
The most frequently reported reasons for going to City Hall
included attending Council meetings, obtaining dog
licenses/tags, and obtaining building or other permits.
Over three-fourths of the residents who have been to City
Hall or who know where it is located feel that the location
is fine where it is.
Six in ten of the respondents thought that the City Hall
should blend well with surrounding buildings, while a
quarter thought is should be highly visible and distinct
looking.
When read a list of services and asked which were important
for City Hall to offer, the most frequently mentioned
services were those dealing with the use of land in the
community.
While just over half of the respondents thought that it was
important for City Hall to offer car licensing services,
close to seven in ten mentioned that they would make use of
such a service if it were available.
Almost half of those residents who thought it was important
for City Hall to offer land use planning and building
construction safety services did no think that they,
themselves, would use the service.
Just over a tenth of the respondents feel a government
services center is very necessary in Eden Prairie, and just
over half feel it is somewhat necessary.
Two-thirds of the respondents do not feel it is at all
necessary for City Hall to include an auditorium and public
meeting space.
-::
Just over six in ten of the respondents expect the ro
l
e
o
f
city government in Eden Prairie to change over the ne
x
t
f
i
v
e
to ten years.
Of the 189 residents who anticipate changes in the rol
e
o
f
city government, many mentioned that the change would
involve the need for increased services and related
personnel.
Over two-thirds of the residents in the study indicate
d
t
h
a
t
they had voted in the May 6, 1986 referendum on City H
a
l
l
.
This ranged from 43% in the general population sampl
e
t
o
9
3
%
in the sample drawn from known voters.
Among those residents who indicated that they voted
i
n
t
h
e
referendum, cost, the necessity of a new building, a
n
d
location were the three issues most frequently menti
o
n
e
d
a
s
having influenced their vote.
Among those residents who indicated that they did no
t
v
o
t
e
in the referendum, being uninformed or uninterested,
o
u
t
o
f
town, or too busy were the most frequently mentioned
r
e
a
s
o
n
s
for not voting.
30i0
CHAPTER IV
PROGRAM FOR THE BUILDING
Chair:
Tom Bierman, Fred Hoisington
Members:
Dennis Dirlam, Marty Jessen, Jim Rannow, Lyle Shaw
This Subcommittee had a rather broad charge: to determine t
h
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
o
f
t
h
e
new City Hall. A program is a broad concept for defining wh
a
t
a
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
o
u
g
h
t
to be. This term relates to a variety of elements, from the
u
s
e
a
n
d
"
f
e
e
l
"
o
f
Interior space to the achitecture and "statement" of the bui
l
d
i
n
g
'
s
o
u
t
w
a
r
d
image. In order to make the task manageable, the Subcommitte
e
u
s
e
d
t
h
e
information and decisions from the studies of the subcommitt
e
e
s
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
i
n
Chapters I-III.
Funds for architectural services to assist the Committee h
a
d
b
e
e
n
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
the City Council. Wally Daniels of the firm Setter, Leach
&
L
i
n
d
s
t
r
o
m
,
I
n
c
.
,
who had been the project manager for the City Hall propose
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
M
a
r
c
h
1
9
8
6
referendum, provided the expertise the Subcommittee reque
s
t
e
d
.
W
h
i
l
e
Subcommittee members at first believed some general relati
o
n
s
h
i
p
s
e
x
i
s
t
e
d
between employees or population and building square footag
e
,
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
s
t
u
d
y
proved that no standard existed. Accordingly, the Subcommi
t
t
e
e
a
n
a
l
y
z
e
d
staffing projections, public space expectations, and buildi
n
g
u
s
e
f
r
o
m
a
"bottom-up" approach. Its conclusions suggested ranges of
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
s
i
z
e
s
a
n
d
functions.
The Subcommittee's final report appears on the next two pa
g
e
s
.
T
o
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
summarize its recommendations:
A multi-level building of 37,000 to 41,000 square feet shoul
d
b
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
all at one time. Interior and exterior architecture shoul
d
c
o
n
v
e
y
functionality, efficiency, and good utility of space while
b
e
i
n
g
w
a
r
m
a
n
d
inviting. It should blend reasonably well with surroundin
g
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
environmental conditions, while reflecting the public natu
r
e
o
f
t
h
e
building. City Hall should have a geographically central l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
a
s
i
t
e
preferably eight acres minimum in size (five acres absolut
e
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
)
.
T
h
e
cost for the building - in terms of building shell, buildi
n
g
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
,
a
n
d
interior finishes - should be around $70/square foot (1986
d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
.
?Oh
REPORT OF THE PROGRAM SUBCOMMITTEE
RESIDENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MN
Throughout February and March 1987, the Program Subcommittee has explored
what should be key elements for Eden Prairie's City Hall. During the
review process, the Subcommittee used the professional advice of the
architect for the earlier City Hall proposal, a substantial amount of
Information gathered by the staff liaison, and the results of the resident
survey to guide members to recommendations. These recommendations are
presented to the full Residents Advisory Committee on City Administrative
offices for comment and adoption.
A building "program" is a broad concept for defining what a building ought
to be. It can contain both specific and general elements as well as
identify structural particulars and architectural themes. For ease and
clarity, the Subcommittee narrowed its focus to the parameters to be
discussed below. Many recommendations are general in nature because
neither a design nor a site for the building now exist.
Services To Be Offered: The types of services provided at City Hall should
be similar to those which presently exist. Granted, the services offered
may evolve in ways which are not now predictable; however, the structure in
the administrative offices should not need much change to handle future
demands. Having other governmental or private agencies housed in the City
offices appears neither necessary nor desired.
Staff Size: Assuming that projections made for the development of the
community are accurate and in order to maintain at least the current level
of service quality, the building should be designed to house 105 to 115
employees. This number of staff members will probably be reached in about
five to ten years. This staffing requirement is comparable with cities of
similar size, and one at which administrative staffing should stabilize.
Staff size after additions in 1987 will number 70.
Public Areas: The image one gains upon entering the building should be of
functionality, efficiency, and good utility of space. It should be warm
and inviting. Easy orientation and easily identified access to other
levels will enhance everyone's use of the building. Because providing
space for Council and Commission meetings is an important function of a
city hall, there should be ample space and a number of meeting and
conference rooms with built-in flexibility. A feeling of spaciousness is •
not critical; however, it should be considered if the building design will
result in little additional cost.
The City Hall should include a multi-purpose entrance area, seating for 150
persons in the Council Room, and other public meeting areas. Multiple use
of as many spaces as possible - for both public and staff areas - should be
encouraged.
Building Size: In order to accommodate the types and levels of services,
the amount of staff positions to provide those services, and the public
areas needed for the public use and image of the building, City Hall should
be between 37,000 and 41,000 square feet in size.
-2 -
City Halls are public buildings and require more space than "a typical
office building" because of the need for public meeting areas (e.g. City
Council and Commission rooms), the presence of several relatively
autonomous departments, and greater storage needs due to the historical
nature of public records. A range of 37,000 to 41,000 square feet is
recommended. This office space is consistent with cities of similar size
which the Subcommittee has studied.
To minimize future cost, the full 37,000 to 41,000 square feet should be
constructed all at one time.
The exact size of the building will depend on the building design which, in
turn, will depend on soil and topographic characteristics of a site. The
building should be multi-level, with the number of levels dictated by these
characteristics. If a basement level is feasible, it should be used only
as non-public space. Multiple use of space should be sought as much as
P055 ible.
Exterior Building Image: The architecture of City Hall should convey the
qualities already identified for the public areas of the building. The
future City Hall should be designed such that it blends reasonably well
with surrounding buldings and environmental conditions. The design, while
not ostentatious, should reflect the public nature of the building. While
design is somewhat site-dependent, the look of the city halls of such
cities as Plymouth and Eagan should be the design goal. The building
should be multi-level (because this design is more cost-effective) as
dictated by the topography of the site. While it appears that expansion of
the building will not be necessary, the design should allow for future
expansion should the need arise.
Cost: After review of construction costs of five other city halls,
buildings in the metropolitan area, and buildings in Eden Prairie, the
Subcommittee concluded that costs for the building, its mechanical support
and interior interior finishes, should be approximately $70 per square foot
in 1986 dollars. Costs not included in this figure are such things as
parking lots, landscaping, communications equipment, furniture, and land
and site preparation.
Size and Location: The size of the land on which the City Hall will be
located should have a minimum of eight acres. This size will allow
flexibility in the design and configuration of the building on the site
while providing some open space on the City Hall grounds. Eight acres will
also allow possible building expansion and space for parking areas
(estimated to be 200 spaces) in accordance with development standards in
the Ordinance Code.
City Hall should have a geographically central location.
Summary: The new City Hall should be well-designed and impart the public
nature of the building with effective use of space. The building should
not be ostentatious. It should blend well with surrounding buildings and
environmental conditions. It should be designed to house 105 to 115
employees who will provide the services generally found at other city halls
in metropolitan-area suburbs. It should have sufficient public meeting
areas within the building. To accommodate the needs identified by the
Subcommittee, the City Hall should be between 37,000 and 41,000 square feet
in size and allow for future expansion should that unlikely need arise.
The cost for the building - in terms of the building shell, building
equipment, and interior finishes - should be approximately 870 per square
foot (in 1986 dollars). A centrally-located site with a minimum size of
eight acres will be needed.
CHAPTER V
SITE SELECTION/BUILDING DESIGN
Chair: Rich Anderson
Members: Merle Gamm, Fred Hoisington, Steve Hoyt,
Jerry LaBarre, Jim Ostenson, Dave Spaulding
This group focused its efforts on identifying sites which would accommodate the
recommendations of the program subcommittee. Using the funds for professional
services approved by Council, Setter, Leach & Lindstrom provided site and layout
analysis, while Krueger Appraisals, Inc. gathered information on a preliminary
basis regarding anticipated and appropriate costs for land at several sites.
Committee members identified a number of sites which could be considered and
later reduced the number to eight. Criteria for weighting and scoring the sites
were established by the full committee. These criteria and weights are listed
below:
Cost of Land
29%
Building Efficiency
17%
Location/Accessibility
14%
Site Now Owned by City
11%
Relationship to Other Uses
11%
Site Size
9%
Sites scored highest if they were less than a "benchmark" site (a "pure" 5 acres
@ $3.00/s.f., or $653,000), accommodated a two-story building, were within 1/4-
mile of geographical population center, had excellent access and visibility,
were owned by the City, were totally compatible/consistent with surrounding
existing and future land uses and Guide Plan, and between five and eight acres
in size.
The Subcommittee's recommendation was for the City to negotiate the purchase of
three privately-owned parcels:
*Site 8, ADC property, northeast corner of Anderson Lakes Parkway and
Mitchell Road;
*Site 7, Carmody property, north of Anderson Lakes Parkway along Purgatory
Creek;
*Site 10, Equitable property, southeast curve of Equitable Drive south of
Valley View Road;
and to have Site 2, the old City Hall site, be a fall-back site in the event
that an acceptable price were not negotiated for any of the three sites.
Further, consideration should be given to purchase of the five acres immediately
south of the old City Hall so that the present building and its use can be
maintained if this site were ultimately selected.
Costs for the privately-owned sites could be expected to range between $550,000
and $1,600,000 depending how (and if) the parcels could be subdivided.
CHAPTER VI
FINANCE AND IMPLEMENTATION
Chair: Marty Jessen
Members: Ann Boline, Ken Brooks, John Hartsough, Paul Redpath, Lyle Shaw
This Subcommittee discussed ways in which recommendations from the other five
subcommittees could be put into action. Its report appears on the next six
pages. In summary, recommendations for financing and implementing the new City
Hall plan are to:
*Secure land as quickly as practical and consider use of cash reserves for
outright purchase;
*Make decision to build by February 1991 so that building may be occupied
March 1, 1993;
*Establish a Building Fund with an annual levy approximating 0.6 mill
through 1997, and continue the levy for rent in 1992 through 1997;
*If a Building Fund is not established, gain approval through referendum for
issuance of general obligation bonds, which has lowest long-term cost; and
*If referendum is also not chosen, look at other long-term financing
techniques. •
The full Committee endorsed these recommendations, with the exception of one
member who dissented because the issue would not be placed in front of residents
on a referendum as had been done previously.
TO:
FULL COMMITTEE
FROM:
FINANCE AND IMPLEMENTATION SUBCOMMITTEE
SUBJECT:
SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT
DATE:
SEPTEMBER 14, 1987
The Subcommittee makes the following recommendation
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
i
t
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
:
Land Acquisition: Land for the new City Hall should be secure
d
a
s
quickly as practical. The City Council should c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
u
s
e
o
f
i
t
s
cash reserve for full, outright purchase of the sit
e
s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d
.
Occupancy: The new City Hall should be ready for occupanc
y
o
n
M
a
r
c
h
1, 1993, the day after the first three-year renewa
l
o
p
t
i
o
n
e
x
p
i
r
e
s
o
n
the current lease for space at 7600 Executive Drive
.
Financing Method: Several financing methods are available. The Subcommittee strongly recommends that a Building Fu
n
d
b
e
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
,
and that this new levy be set at 0.6 mills. Addit
i
o
n
a
l
l
y
,
a
f
t
e
r
t
h
e
new City Hall is occupied, the amount paid for r
e
n
t
i
n
1
9
9
2
s
h
o
u
l
d
continue to be levied throughout the term of
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
agreement (1997).
The Subcommittee's second choice is to issue gene
r
a
l
o
b
l
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
b
o
n
d
s
approved through referendum. This choice would
h
a
v
e
t
h
e
l
o
w
e
r
t
o
t
a
l
cost of long-term strategies, although there is r
i
s
k
t
h
a
t
i
t
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
defeated. The referendum would need to be held b
y
M
a
r
c
h
1
9
9
1
.
The third choice is using such instruments
a
s
c
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
e
s
o
f
participation which offer the advantages of long
-
t
e
r
m
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
,
b
u
t
which carry interest charges up to one percent
g
r
e
a
t
e
r
t
h
a
n
b
o
n
d
s
approved by referendum.
Memoranda are attached and are to be consid
e
r
e
d
a part of the subcommittee's report.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Implementation and Finance Subcommittee
Residents Advisory Committee on City Administrative Offices
FROM: Craig W. Dawson, Staff Liaison
SUBJECT: Financing Alternatives and Final Report
DATE: September 14, 1987
The Subcommittee is nearing completion of its work. A draft of the final report
should be presented to the full Committee on September 30.
The bulk of the report could be taken from a memorandum prepared for the
Subcommittee's June 11 meeting. Little if any information has been uncovered
which would conflict with or add to the information contained in that
memorandum.
Some additional information has been prepared as requested by the Subcommittee.
One of the techniques which the members found inviting was the establishment of
a building fund. This alternative embodies a pay-as-you-go philosophy, a method
generally not used in Eden Prairie because of a belief that future residents and
businesses should also bear the cost of long-lived City facilities. Some
concerns have also been raised that monies raised may not remain in the fund -
they may be raided for other purchases or in an attempt to reduce the City's tax
levy.
The following table and scenarios about the growth of a building fund have been
assembled without a great degree of sophistication but with quite conservative
assumptions.
Funds Raised Mill Levy @ Projected Assessed Value @ 0.6 Mill Levy $250,000 Levy
1988 $397 million $238,200 0.63
1989 439 million 263,400 0.57
1990 480 million 288,000 0.52
1991 520 million 312,000 0.48
1992 560 million 336,000 0.45
1993 600 million 360,000 0.42
1994 640 million 384,000 0.39
1995 680 million 408,000 0.37
1996 720 million 432,000 0.35
1997 760 million 456,000 0.33
1998 480,000
800 million 0.31
-2-
Assumptions
1. Growth in assessed value = $40 million/year
2. Tax increment financing districts are not returned to
general tax rolls (Partial retirement is, in fact,
anticipated for taxes payable 1990 of about $18 million
assessed value, and full retirement for taxes payable
1992 adding another $12 million assessed value.)
The following scenarios assume that payments for $4 million in cons
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
costs begin in 1992 for occupancy of the new City Hall on march 1,
1
9
9
3
.
Consequently, if a contract is entered into for the statutory-maxim
u
m
f
i
v
e
years, the costs of construction should be paid in full by 1997. I
t
i
s
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
assumed that interest earnings will equal the cost of inflation; he
n
c
e
,
b
o
t
h
matters are ignored.
Scenario A
Constant 0.6-mill levy
Funds raised thru 1997
Continuation of levy for rent 1993-1997
(Rent = $205,000 in 1992)
Scenario B
Constant $250,000 levy
Funds raised thru 1997
Continuation of levy for rent 1993-1997
(Rent = $205,000 in 1992)
$3,861,000
990,000
$4,851,00C
$2,500,000
990,000
$3,590,000
Cost: The Subcommittee needs to recommend the cost of the project
.
T
o
d
a
t
e
,
the following figures have been used by the Subcommittee and/or ot
h
e
r
subcommittees:
Building (incl. fees and other internal systems)
37,000-41,000 s.f. @$70 plus other items above $3.25 - 3.55 million
Site Work (Parking, Landscaping) 300,000
Land Cost (5-8 acres, $3.00+/s.f.)
$0.7 - 1.1 million
Range of Cost
14.25 -4.95 million
+ Contingency
400,000
$4.65 - 5.35 million
Implementation: Decisions need to be reached on the following items
:
a) When should land be secured?
Much discussion has focused on the idea that the City should own,
or be in the process of buying, the land when the decision iS
made to finance non-land costs for the New City Hall. It has been
suggested that Council secure the land as soon as practicable,
including outright purchase with use of the City's cash reserve.
7
- 3 -
b) When should the building be ready for occupancy?
Although the charge from the City Council stated that C
o
u
n
c
i
l
will determine when the City will end leasing office sp
a
c
e
,
several Committee members have expressed opinions that
a
recommendation should be made regarding a preference for
occupancy in the City's own building.
c) Which method(s) of financing are preferred and deserve f
u
r
t
h
e
r
analysis?
Several vehicles exist for financing the new City Hall.
S
o
m
e
of them have been discussed by the Subcommittee and some very
preliminary data have been prepared about possible finan
c
i
a
l
impact. Any alternative recommended by the Subcommittee
s
h
o
u
l
d
have more thorough analysis by firms with financial exper
t
i
s
e
on these matters. The Subcommittee should identify its
preferences in order of priority.
Considerable discussion has taken place about the use o
f
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
d
u
m
f
o
r
financing approval. The following table gives example
s
o
n
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
d
u
m
in some other metropolitan area suburbs.
Original building approved with referendum.
Expansions accomplished without referendum.
New City Hall will probably be with referendum.
Present City Hall and expansions without referendum. New facility without referendum.
New City Hall with referendum (1987).
Original building approved with referendum.
Expansion & remodeling approved with referendum (1987)
Facility approved with referendum (on second try)
New facility approved without referendum.
Original City Hall approved with referendum.
Expansion approved with referendum.
Original building approved without referendum. Expansion approved without referendum.
Original building approved with referendum.
Expansion approved with referendum.
Facility approved without referendum.
Facility approved without referendum.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Apple Valley
Brooklyn Park
Burnsville
Champlin
Chanhassen
Chaska
Maple Grove
Minnetonka
New Brighton
Plymouth
St. Louis Park
MEMORANDUM
TO: Implementation and Finance Subcommi
t
t
e
e
Residents Advisory Committee in Cit
y
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
O
f
f
i
c
e
s
FROM: Craig Dawson, Staff Liaiso
SUBJECT: Financing Alternatives
DATE: June 11, 1987
At its last meeting, the Subcommitte
e
w
a
s
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
w
h
i
c
h
are available to the City. We have
e
x
p
l
o
r
e
d
s
o
m
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
i
m
a
n
d
compiled the following information t
o
a
s
s
i
s
t
i
n
m
a
k
i
n
g
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Referendum: Traditionally, the safest way to o
b
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
l
o
w
e
s
t
r
a
t
e
o
f
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
f
o
r
financing a City Hall is through a r
e
f
e
r
e
n
d
u
m
a
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
i
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
o
f
b
o
n
d
s
.
T
h
e
C
i
t
y
commits its full faith and credit du
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
t
e
r
m
o
f
t
h
e
b
o
n
d
s
.
B
e
c
a
u
s
e
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
o
n
t
h
e
bonds is tax-exempt, the City is abl
e
t
o
p
a
y
o
f
f
t
h
e
b
o
n
d
s
w
i
t
h
l
o
w
e
r
r
a
t
e
s
o
f
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
than conventional financing. The Cit
y
o
f
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
l
y
i
s
s
u
e
s
d
e
b
t
f
o
r
p
e
r
i
o
d
s
of 15 - 20 years, although State la
w
a
l
l
o
w
s
u
p
t
o
3
0
y
e
a
r
s
.
Two risks are readily apparent with
a
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
d
u
m
.
F
i
r
s
t
,
t
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
b
o
n
d
s
t
o
b
e
authorized is high because numerous
c
o
n
t
i
n
g
e
r
f
,
l
e
s
a
n
d
i
n
f
l
a
t
i
o
n
m
u
s
t
b
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
.
T
h
i
s
m
a
)
contribute to the second risk: the
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
d
u
m
m
a
y
f
a
i
l
.
Bonds must be issued within "a reas
o
n
a
b
l
e
p
e
r
i
o
d
o
f
t
i
m
e
"
a
f
t
e
r
a
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
d
u
m
p
a
s
s
e
s
.
T
h
i
s
time frame is fuzzy, and we would re
l
y
o
n
b
o
n
d
c
o
u
n
s
e
l
a
d
v
i
c
e
.
Current federal law also exempts a C
i
t
y
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
s
u
e
s
l
e
s
s
t
h
a
n
$
5
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
i
n
a
c
a
l
e
n
d
a
r
year to have bond proceeds for that
y
e
a
r
from arbitrage rules.
Lease Purchase. The City Attorney a
d
v
i
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
S
t
a
t
e
l
a
w
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
s
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
s
w
h
i
c
h
t
a
k
e
more than five years to accomplish
u
n
l
e
s
s
t
h
e
y
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
d
u
m
.
S
e
v
e
r
a
l
techniques have been designed to fin
e
s
s
e
a
r
o
u
n
d
t
h
e
l
i
t
e
r
a
l
i
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
s
t
a
t
u
t
e
.
One such option is issuing certifica
t
e
s
o
f
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
o
n
.
(
T
h
e
S
u
b
c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
provided with two examples of this v
e
h
i
c
l
e
.
)
U
n
d
e
r
t
h
i
s
a
r
r
a
n
g
e
m
e
n
t
a
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
corporation and the City would execu
t
e
a
l
e
a
s
e
/
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
i
s
s
u
e
c
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
e
s
for other parties to invest in. One
c
o
u
l
d
v
i
e
w
t
h
i
s
a
s
o
t
h
e
r
s
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
contract for deed between the City a
n
d
t
h
e
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
T
h
e
C
i
t
y
w
o
u
l
d
i
n
effect, but not technically, be ret
i
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
d
e
b
t
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
a
n
n
u
a
l
l
e
a
s
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Technically, the City's obligation
i
s
o
n
l
y
f
o
r
o
n
e
y
e
a
r
;
h
e
n
c
e
,
a
n
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
r
i
s
k
i
s
introduced and the rate of interest u
n
d
e
r
t
h
i
s
a
r
r
a
n
g
e
m
e
n
t
i
s
0
.
5
t
o
1
.
0
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
h
i
g
h
e
r
than a referendum-approved issue. B
o
n
d
c
o
u
n
s
e
l
s
a
d
v
i
s
e
t
h
a
t
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
e
a
r
n
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
certificates is exempt from federal
i
n
c
o
m
e
t
a
x
,
b
u
t
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
t
a
x
a
b
l
e
o
n
t
h
e
s
t
a
t
e
i
n
c
o
m
e
schedule.
Another tool is a more conventional
l
e
a
s
e
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
a
r
r
a
n
g
e
m
e
n
t
w
h
i
c
h
w
o
u
l
d
n
o
t
e
n
t
a
i
l
t
h
e
certificates described above. With
t
h
i
s
m
e
c
h
a
n
i
s
m
a
b
u
i
l
d
e
r
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
s
m
o
r
t
g
a
g
o
r
i
n
what would customarily be a turnkey
t
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
.
A
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
s
t
o
h
a
v
i
n
g
a
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
p
a
r
t
y
construct a building include the sa
v
i
n
g
s
i
n
t
i
m
e
c
o
m
p
a
r
e
d
t
o
t
h
a
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
b
i
d
d
i
n
g
process, and the alleged savings in
c
o
s
t
s
w
h
i
c
h
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
h
a
v
e
o
v
e
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
undertakings. Formerly, developers w
e
r
e
a
b
l
e
t
o
h
a
v
e
t
h
e
t
a
x
-
e
x
e
m
p
t
s
t
a
t
u
s
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
projects pass through to them. Rece
n
t
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
f
e
d
e
r
a
l
l
a
w
r
e
m
o
v
e
d
t
h
i
s
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
.
U
n
d
e
r
the conventional arrangement, the Ci
t
y
w
o
u
l
d
a
l
s
o
b
e
l
i
a
b
l
e
f
o
r
r
e
a
l
e
s
t
a
t
e
t
a
x
e
s
(
p
a
i
d
i
n
the rent) until the purchase was cons
u
m
m
a
t
e
d
.
-' -
Lease purchase is not to be confused with sale le
a
s
e
b
a
c
k
,
a
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
w
h
i
c
h
w
a
s
p
o
p
u
l
a
r
a
few years ago. Sale leaseback involves a City selling a property to another entity and then paying it for use of, or a guarantee of reve
n
u
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
.
A
n
o
t
a
b
l
e
l
o
c
a
l
example is the St. Paul Civic Center.
Establishment of a BuildinoFund: Another techniq
u
e
t
o
f
i
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
e
w
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
i
s
o
n
a
pay-as-you-go basis. A building fund is a varian
t
o
f
t
h
i
s
m
e
t
h
o
d
.
B
e
c
a
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
f
i
v
e
-
year limit on pruchases, a fund would need to be
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
a
n
d
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
a
c
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
e
d
before construction is begun. The difference betw
e
e
n
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
c
o
s
t
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
fund balance at the time of construction would ne
e
d
t
o
b
e
p
a
i
d
w
i
t
h
i
n
f
i
v
e
y
e
a
r
s
.
The City could also take advantage of moneys in i
t
s
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
.
T
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
available varies from year to year; for discussio
n
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
s
,
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
o
n
e
c
o
u
l
d
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
$1 million for a one-time expense.
City staff has tried to formulate hypothetical cas
h
f
l
o
w
m
o
d
e
l
s
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
a
d
i
f
f
e
r
i
n
g
c
o
s
t
and different dates of occupancy. Significant cha
n
g
e
s
r
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
a
C
i
t
y
'
s
t
a
x
i
n
g
authority and the computations for assessed valu
a
t
i
o
n
w
e
r
e
j
u
s
t
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
1
9
8
7
Legislature. For example, in 1988 all cities may
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
h
e
i
r
l
e
v
y
b
a
s
e
o
n
l
y
3
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
plus an adjustment for population, but NOT an adju
s
t
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
commecial/industrial valuation. (It appears that
t
h
e
C
/
I
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
e
s
c
a
l
a
t
o
r
w
i
l
l
b
e
restored in 1989.) At this time, it is prematur
e
t
o
m
a
k
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
a
f
u
l
l
e
r
understanding of the ramifcations of the new sta
t
u
t
e
s
.
Some discussion had occurred about the impact on
a
"
t
y
p
i
c
a
l
"
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
h
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
i
f
a
set amount of property tax revenue were set asid
e
f
o
r
a
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
f
u
n
d
.
T
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
table represents the effect of a $250,000 levy f
o
r
t
a
x
e
s
p
a
y
a
b
l
e
1
9
8
7
:
Homestead
Est. Mkt. Value
$ 80,000
120,000
160,000
"Extra" Tax
$ 11.61
19.78
27.96
The mill rate impact would have been 0.73 mills.
A
m
i
l
l
r
a
i
s
e
d
$
3
4
1
,
0
0
0
i
n
1
9
8
7
.
Again, changes in the property classificaiton an
d
t
a
x
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
m
a
k
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
b
o
u
t
1988 taxes highly speculative. The 1987 figures should, how
e
v
e
r
,
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
t
h
e
h
i
g
h
e
s
t
cost because there will be new tax base growth.
CWD:jdp
Final Comments: All of the Committee members wish to thank the City Council for
the privilege to participate in a study which will have lasting importance for
Eden Prairie. The Council's aim of broad-based representation of the community
on this Committee was realized: each member brought different perspectives and
priorities into the planning and study process, and the Committee arrived at a
thoughtful, well-rounded consensus which is conveyed in this report. We commend
the City Council for the generous financial and staff resources which it made
available thoughout the study. Without this assistance, the Committee's work
would have been considerably longer and have had less depth of analysis. The
Committee is confident that this report provides the City Council with several
viable, practical alternatives for the construction of a new City Hall. We,
too, wait for this project to reach fruition and look forward to being present
for its grand opening.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS:
Performance is measured on a scale from 1 to 5 as follows:
1. Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet expectations, improvement is required.
2. Developmental: Performance demonstrates positive growth, strong effort to
perform is evident.
3. Satisfactory: Performance meets all expectations.
4. Above Average: Performance frequently exceeds expectations, above average effort
Is evident.
5. Outstanding: Performance consistently exceeds expectations, contributions and
effort are dependably high.
CITY MANAGER EVALUATION
NOVEMBER 1987
I. General - 15% of Eval.
Range 2.62-4.25 Ave.= 3.27
II. Job Responsibilities
A. City/Staff Management - 30%
Range 2.9-4.13 Ave.= 3.33
B. Council Relations - 20%
Range 2.77-3.5 Ave.= 3.01
C. Community Relations - 15%
Range 2.9-3.7 Ave.= 3.11
III. Goals and Objectives - 20%
A. Cap. Improvement Program
Range 2-4 Ave.= 2.82
B. Comp. Worth
Range 2-4 Ave.=3
C. Waste Management
Range 2-5 Ave.=2.76
D. Budget Process
Range 3-5 Ave.=3.4
Cumulative Weighted Score
Range 2.79-3.83 Ave.=3.15
IV. Summary Comments
A. Major Strengths
Fiscal Responsibility
Budget prep., fiscal management, willingness and
ability to adapt to changing conditions, openess with
anyone, ability to learn from mistakes, committed to
self-improvement.
Honest, hard-working, fiscally conservative
Ability to manage a multitude of details.
Maintains composure; friendly, accessible
Processes data well, offers thoughtful suggestions.
B. Areas of Improvement
Lacking follow-through on requests; need responses
to informational requests in a more timely manner.
Need periodic info. on problems, issues, goals,
strategies, etc. as adopted or proposed by city agencies.
Communication, whether real or perceived, needs to
be improved. Provide more planning and updating of progess
on a regular basis.
C. Other comments
Positive: moving from reactionary to proactionary
mode. Some strain in council communications.
No woman dept. head. Like to see more innovation
and discussion. Manager seems more reactive than
proactive.