Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 10/20/1987 , AGENDA JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, OCTOBER 20, 1987 6:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7600 Executive Drive COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard T. Anderson, George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS: Julianne Bye, Christine Dodge, Bob Hallett, Charles Ruebling, Edward Schuck, Richard E. Anderson, and Douglas Fell PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF: Director of Planning Chris Enger ROLL CALL A. CALL MEETING TO ORDER B. DISCUSSION OF ROLES OF PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL IN THE CURRENT DEVEtO MiMENT REVI PROCESS C. ITEMS OF CONCERN FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION 1. Development of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (i.e. slopes, etc.) 2. Relationship of Footprint to Lot Size far Residential Construction 3. Establishment in Comprehensive Plan of Area for R1-44 Lot Sizes 4. Installation/Hook-up to Sanitary Sewer and Water 5. Discussion Papers D. ADJOURNMENT. EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL L TUESDAY, OCTOBER 20, 1987 7:3D PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7600 Executive Drive COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Community Services Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PRESENTATION OF AWARD OF MERIT FROM MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. MINUTES A. Minutes of City Council meeting held Tuesday, September 8= 1987 Page 2616 B. Minutes of City Council meeting held Tuesday, September 15j 1987 Page 2629 III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List Page 2667 B. Award bid for Community Center Repair Page 2668 C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 52-87 regulating the sale of strong Page 2452 beer D. Request from Ray Stodola to sell land adjacent to Eden Valley Park Page 2669 E. Resolution No. 87-286 approving State Bonded Fund Grant for Page 268D Acquisition and Development of RTM -Lake Park Expansion F. Final Plat roval for Cardinal Hills (east of Baker Roads west of Page 2682 Highway No. 494 Resolution No. Y9 G. Final Plat approval for Shady Oak Crosstown Addition (Amoco Station Page 2685 south of the Crosstown, east of Shady Oak Road) Resolution No. 87- 90 H. Change Order No. 1L Watermain Extension from Baker Road to Rowland Page 2688 Road, I.C. 52-1T7 1 City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,October 20, 1987 I. Resolution approving the establishment of a Water Maintenance Page 2689 and Repair Fund a the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District (Resolution No. 87-287) J. Resolution requesting participation in maintenance and repairs in Page 2693 the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District Resolution No. 87-288) K. Grading Permit for Olympic Hills Golf Course Page 2694 L. Approve grading permit for portion of Lot 12, Eden Prairie Acres Page 2695 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. RAVEN RIDGE II a The Cambridge Group. Request for Zoning District Page 2696 Amendment within the RM-6.5 District on 3.04 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 3.04 acres into 18 lots and 2 outlots for construction of 18 townhouse units. Location: East of Edenvale Boulevard, South Raven Court. (Ordinance No. 50-87, Rezoning; Resolution No. 87-282, Preliminary Plat) B. AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE by Opus Corporation. Request for Planned Page 2702 Unit Development Concept Amendment on 14.36 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 14.36 acres with variances; Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 5.34 acres, Preliminary Plat of 14.36 acres into 1 lot for construction of a 5-story office building. Location: North of CSAH #62, south of Yellow Circle Drive. (Resolution No. 87-284, PUD Concept Amendment to American Family Insurance PUD; Ordinance No. 51-B7-PUD-13-87, Rezoning and PUD; Resolution No. 87-285, Preliminary Plat) C. VACATION 87-09, VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ON Page 2712 LOTS 35 38 AND 39, BLOCK 1, WYNDHAM KNOLLS (ResolutionNo. 87- nry V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Page 2713 VI. ORDINANCES & RESDLUTIONS A. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 53-81 Requiring Filing of Financial Page 2714 Statements Candidates and o i tees VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Request appeal a Mr. & Mrs. John McSwiggan from decision made a Page 2580 Board of Appeals & Adjustments on Variance Request #87-37 B. I-494 Traffic Study Presentation a BRW, Inc. C. WINDSONG II a The Koosman & Rice Company. Request for Preliminary Page 2722 PTat of 1.43 acres into lots. Location: Northeast of Anderson Lakes Parkway at Chestnut Drive (Resolution No. 87-283, Preliminary Plat) VIII. REPORTS DF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS IX. APPOINTMENTS City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,October 20, 1987 X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Proposal for a Comprehensive Waste Management Program Page 2727 B. Report of City Manager C. Report of City Attorney D. Report of Director of Planning E. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Edenvale Trail (EAW) Page 2728 2. Request authorization to hire Appraiser for Riley Lake Page 2750 acquisition F. Report of Director of Public Works XI. NEW BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT { 7 7�ag Y UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1987 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Jean Harris and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie. Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Community Services Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: All members were present. I. PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published and property owners on the assessment rolls had been notified. He reviewed the contents of the notice sent to property owners and outlined the procedures to be followed for the appeal process. 1. I.C. 51-272: Sidewalk, Bikeway, Storm Sewer and Street Improvements on Valley View Road from Mitchell Road to Eden Prairie Road Director of Public Works Dietz reviewed the improvements to Valley View Road and the method by which the individual assessments were determined. He noted that, while the total cost of the project is in excess of $2,500,000. the net assessment is $553,132, with the remainder of the total cost to be absorbed by the City. Dietz reviewed the letters received prior to the meeting regarding the assessments. Peterson asked if there are any assessed properties adja- cent to the yet-to-be completed portion west of the rail- road. Dietz said Outlot K of the Edenvale properties is adjacent to that portion of the road and further noted that property is included on the assessment rolls. Larry Van Meter, 14412 Fairway Drive, said he owns the four condominiums on the corner of Valley View and Fairway Drive. He said he had questions as to whether the x City Council Minutes -2- September 8, 1987 L assessment pertained to the entire condo project or just to him. Dietz responded that the City has not been a participant in the condominium process at all because the owners file that information with the County. He said in this instance there is no separate PID for the common ground around the units. He said further documentation would be required before a final determination could be made on this particular assessment. Dwaine Voas, 15807 Valley View Road, said he felt this amounted to double taxation since the improvements were required by the additional traffic volume on the roadway and he questioned why there should be an assessment at all. He also asked if the $3,600 maximum amount explained by Mr. Dietz would pertain to his property. Dietz responded that the Voas property was one that could be subdivided into two lots; therefore, the front foot amount was used and the assessment was set at $4,554. Pidcock asked if this property had ever been assessed before for Valley View Road. Dietz said only utility assessments have been made against the properties along Valley View. A discussion followed as to whether the lot could be subdivided. Mary Raabe, 14193 Bedford Drive, asked if each condo unit within the Village Green project was to be assessed the same amount and if only those units with front footage on Valley View were assessed. A discussion followed re- garding the method of assessing this project. Ms Raabe noted it appears that all of the units were assessed, with only a few units excluded. Peterson asked if it was the intention to send notice to all of the units in the project. Dietz said, since there seems to be no common area against which to make the assessment, he assumed the assessment was sent to all units. Ms Raabe noted that adding more units should re- sult in a reduction in the assessment amount for each of the units. Bentley said he thought the question of whether the assess- ment should be made to the individual homeowners or to the homeowners' association needed clarification. Peterson noted that we have no choice but to continue the entire group until the questions are resolved. �iiJ r City Council Minutes -3- September 8, 1987 A discussion followed regarding the requirement that each property owner submit a written objection to the assess- ment in order to retain the right of appeal. City Attorney Pauly noted his opinion that such objections could be made during the course of a continued hearing. Doug Page, 15817 Valley View Road, said he thought the high volume of traffic on Valley View is not produced by the residents adjacent to the road, but rather by traffic coming from the west. He said he thought the widening of the road had resulted in the need for the storm sewer. He also noted that the excess speeds on Valley View has cut down reaction time in and out of the driveways. Bentley noted that Valley View has long been envisioned as a collector road and a major thoroughfare from one end of the City to another. In consideration of the fact that a significant percentage of the traffic is not locally generated, he noted that the City is picking up 4/5 of the cost of the project and it is being assessed at the same rate as similar improvements to a side road would be. Dietz noted the assessments are about 1/2 the cost of a 28-foot residential street. Marge MacManus, 7305 Amber Lane, said she believed that the work to be done on Hwy. 5 will mean that Valley View will become a major thoroughfare. Peterson noted that the assessment amounts for curb, gutter, sidewalks and storm sewer along Valley view are less than the cost of those amenities to other residents in the City. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt that portion of Resolution No. 87-254 relating to project I.C. 51-272, a 20-year assessment at 8% interest, except that assessments on the following properties included in I.C. 51-272 will be continued to the September 15th meeting of the Council: PID 09-116-22-14-0008 - PID 09-116-22-14- 0011 and PID 10-116-22-23-0090 - PID 10-116-22-23-0238. Motion carried unanimously. 2. I.C. 52-101D: Creek Crossing and Street Improvements on Technology Drive from Prairie Center Drive to west of Purgatory Creek. Dietz reviewed the improvements completed and the method by which the assessments were determined. He noted that this project is a rural section so it does not have curb and gutter and has gravel shoulders. He said the total l City Council Minutes -4- September 8, 1987 cost was$783,599 which is substantially higher than the engineer's estimate. Dietz said the assessable area had been limited to those areas that could be developed in the future. He noted that there are provisions to assess those areas now con- sidered to be unbuildable should they become buildable in the future. Dietz reviewed the letters received prior to the meeting regarding these assessments. He noted that this project is not within the T.I.F. District and has never been part of the Major Center Area roadway system. Bentley asked if there is a crediting to roadway improve- ments in return for right-of-way dedication. Dietz said they do their best to not compensate for right-of-way and to not give a credit. He said the theory is that right-of- way costs are assessable costs. Bentley asked how the possible intersection changes at Prairie Center Drive and Hwy. 5 might affect portions of this property. Dietz said he believes the property is enhanced by this roadway no matter what the final resolu- tion of the intersection may be. Bentley said he hoped we aren't killing any possibility of having an adequate access system there because of the in- creased cost. Dietz said we may be in a position at some point of applying for funds to acquire that property to save it for Hwy. 212 right-of-way. Bentley asked why the term was set at 20 years. Dietz said the policy has been to provide a longer pay-back period for projects that are not 100% petition projects. Dick Feerick, 7103 Interlachen Court, said the main concern is the relationship to the north of Technology Drive where two different design approaches are being recommended by MnDOT. He said the concept plan submitted for the property has terrific potential and he thought some of the issues here should be reviewed. Bentley asked if Mr. Feerick was suggesting this parcel be continued for further consultations with Staff. Mr. Feerick said he believed that was mentioned in the letter of objec- tion from the owners. A discussion followed as to whether it would be better to continue the parcel or allow it to proceed in the appeal process. City Council Minutes -5- September 8, 1987 • Walter Carpenter, 13000 Technology Drive, said they were led to believe in February 1983 and again in 1986 that the assessments would be $50 per front foot if they donated the right-of-way. Peterson asked if they had assumed that this property would be assessed at the same rate as property in the Major Center Area. Mr. Carpenter said that was correct. Bentley asked what the estimated amount was in the Feasi- bility Study. Dietz responded that it was $543,200 or $93.49 per front foot. Bentley then asked Mr. Carpenter if he had not sensed at the time of the Feasibility Study that the cost would be higher than $50 per front foot. Mr. Carpenter said they had met with Mr. Dietz and Mr. Jullie in 1986 after the August 1985 Feasibility Study and, further, that they don't object to the project but rather to the amount of the assessment. Peterson noted that the decision is whether or not the improvements made to Technology Drive enhance the value of the adjoining property in the amount that is being assessed. If Mr. Carpenter objects to the assessment, he has the right to appeal to District Court on the basis of the value not being enhanced to the extent of the assess- ment. Pidcock asked when the right-of-way was deeded over to the City. Mr. Carpenter responded it was probably 1983 or 1984. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to adopt that portion of Resolution No. 87-254 relating to project I.C. 52-101D, a 20 year assessment at 8% interest. Motion carried unanimously. 3. I.C. 52-035: Additional Sanitary Sewer, Water, Storm Sewer and Street Improvements on Chestnut Drive east of Anderson Lakes Parkway. Dietz reviewed the improvements completed and the method by which the assessments were determined. He said this project is a residual from the Anderson Lakes Parkway project to complete the work along Chestnut Drive. He said the total cost is $15,502 and will be assessed for a period of 17 years to conform with the original assess- ment for Anderson Lakes Parkway. There were no comments from the audience. City Council Minutes -6- September 8, 1987 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt that portion of Resolution No. 87-254 relating to project I.C. 52-035, a 17 year assessment at 8% interest. Motion carried unanimously. 4. I.C. 52-069: Storm Sewer Improvements on Riverview Road in the Bluffs West 1st, 2nd, and 5th Additions. Dietz reviewed the improvements completed and the method by which the assessments were determined. He said the Feasibility Study for the Bluffs West 5th Addition deter- mined the need for a storm sewer outlet for the entire area. He said Mr. Hustad had agreed to pay the costs for the areas previously subdivided. He said the total project cost is $268,388, somewhat less than the cost estimated in the Feasibility Study. Dietz said copies of the assessment notices for the prop- erties on the north side of Riverview Road were sent to Argus Developers who purchased the Bluffs West 5th Addi- tion. Dietz said some of the proposed assessments were modified after surveys were conducted to see how much was affected by the drainage. He said the property owned by Charles Koshenina was to be withdrawn from the assessment rolls as a result of the drainage survey performed. He recom- mended that rather than have all the assessments recalcu- lated, the assessment for the Koshenina property be absorbed as a City administrative cost. Kate Laseski, 12155 Riverview Road, said the storm sewer was constructed to carry run-off from the Bluffs 5th Addi- tion; therefore she is being required to pay to protect her property from the run-off. She said she thought this sort of assessment is designed to drive people from their homes. She also said there is a restrictive covenant on her property which prohibits development until 1990. Bentley said he thought there was discussion at the time of the Feasibility Study that there would be a minimal assessment against the property with the rest deferred until the property was developed. Dietz said that, while a number of things were discussed at the hearing, he didn't think a resolution was determined. Dietz said the storm sewer was designed to service the entire area. Bentley said he believed this property will probably not receive full benefit from the storm sewer until the parcel is developed. He said there may be justification for an assessment on one acre of the property with deferment of City Council Minutes -7- September 8, 1987 the remainder of the assessment until development occurs. Dietz said he thought it could be considered an exclusion from the assessment district rather than a deferment. Anderson said he was concerned that the full assessment would put a hardship on the property owners until 1990 when they can develop the property. He was in favor of finding a way to exclude some of the assessment until 1990. Harris said she thought the recently-adopted policy re- garding exclusion of property would apply to this property. City Manager Jullie noted that a letter was received from Ms Lorraine Christopher, 10550 West Riverview Drive, ob- jecting to the assessment on her property. Kirby Bayerle, 10488 W. Riverview Drive, asked what Argus will be paying. Dietz said the purchase agreement should speak to the issue and Mr. Bayerle should talk to Argus. Bentley asked if any of these parcels were affected by the washout of the sewer line. Dietz pointed out the parcels affected by the washout. Anderson said he would like to continue this project in order to find out which parcels no longer have access to the storm sewer line because of the storm damage. If the project is continued, Bentley said he would like to see what the breakout would be and suggested alternatives for a partial assessment on the property that would be in keeping with other practices. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to continue that portion of Resolution No. 87-254 relating to project I.C. 52-069 until the September 15th meeting. Motion carried unanimously. 5. I.C. 52-079: Street Paving on Crestwood Terrace from Dell Road to Pioneer Trail. Dietz reviewed the improvements completed and the method by which the assessments were determined. He said the majority of the work was done by the City, resulting in a lower cost per lot than estimated, with a total project cost of $21,145. Dietz said each of the five lots adjacent to the unpaved 1 area were assessed two times the amount assessed to the other lots. In addition he said the term was reduced from seven years to five years. City Council Minutes -8- September 8, 1987 Steve Zumbusch, 9794 Crestwood Terrace, said he was con- cerned that they were being assessed for improvements along the entire length of Crestwood. Dietz responded that some maintenance work was done last week on the previously-paved portion of Crestwood but that work is the City's expense. Mr. Zumbusch noted that the exit onto Pioneer Trail is steeper now that the paving is complete and asked if that could be corrected. Dietz said that problem could be reviewed to see what can be done; however, the same format with a Public Hearing would have to be followed. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt that portion of Resolution No. 87-254 relating to project I.C. 52-079, a five year assessment at 8% interest. Motion carried unanimously. 6. I.C. 52-094: Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Improvements on Baker Road from West 62nd Street to Roberts Drive. Dietz reviewed the improvements completed and the method by which the assessments were determined. The total cost of the project was $67,543, which was less than the Feasi- bility Study estimate. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt that portion of Resolution No. 87-254 relating to project I.C. 52-094, a 20 year assessment at 8% interest. Motion carried unanimously. 7. I.C. 52-096: Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer, and Street Improvements in the Bluffs East 4th Addition. Dietz reviewed the improvements completed and the method by which the assessments were determined. He said the work in the Bluffs East 4th area is by 100% petition. He said the total cost of $1,181,328 was less than the estimated cost. In accordance with the recently-adopted assessment policy, Dietz said the street and storm sewer assessments will be levied this fall but all of the utility improvements will be excluded from assessment for five years or until devel- opment. Scott Gensmer, 9599 Bluff Road, asked if he would be able to protest the assessment at the end of the five year exclusion period. Dietz responded that he would have the )i '� I City Council Minutes -9- September 8, 1987 same rights five years from now. Dietz noted that Exhibit A was incorrect in that the properties to be excluded were not listed in the approp- riate columns for assessment amounts due in 1993. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt that portion of Resolution No. 87-254 relating to project I.C. 52-096, a 20 year assessment at 8% interest, except that Exhibit A should be revised to reflect those proper- ties that will be excluded from the assessment rolls for a period of five years or until development. Motion carried unanimously. 8. I.C. 52-097: Sidewalk, Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer, and Street Improvements on Dell Road and the Interior Street within Wyndham Knoll. Dietz reviewed the improvements completed and the method by which the assessments were determined. He said the total project cost was $706,601 and it was a 100% petition project. Dietz said that $97,854 of the City's share in the total cost will be collected from an escrow account set up by the developer of Hidden Glen 1st & 2nd to be applied to the cost of the roadway. Dietz noted the letter received from Robert Bjorklund, President of New Concept Homes, objecting to the assess- ments. There were no comments from the audience. Bentley asked if there was any reason to spend more time with Mr. Bjorklund to discuss his objection. Dietz re- plied there would be time to correct any error during the next 30 days before we certify the assessment to the County. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt that portion of Resolution No. 87-254 relating to project I.C. 52-097, a five-year assessment at 8% interest. Motion carried unanimously. 9. I.C. 52-101: Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer, and Street Improvements on East and West Riverview Drive and within Bluffs West 5th Addition. Dietz reviewed the improvements completed and the method by which the assessments were determined. He reviewed the properties that would be eligible for exclusion. 1v City Council Minutes -10- September 8, 1987 Tom Brown, 10531 East Riverview Drive, said he did not receive a notice of the assessment and noted that he would like to have his assessment deferred as he is in the middle of constructing his house and his mortgage company will require the entire amount of the assessment to be paid. Dietz said there may have been a problem with who received the notice of the assessment because of the foreclosures on the property and other problems. City Attorney Pauly said he was not aware of any special assessment procedure by which a City's lien can be sub- ordinated to a mortgage interest. Peterson asked if the Council could consider excluding this until 1988. Pauly responded that it could be excluded if the status at this point is unimproved property. Laura Bluml, 10540 West Riverview Drive, asked how the assessments in her neighborhood were determined. Dietz explained the procedure. Ms Bluml then asked if the im- provements have to be completed before the assessment can be levied. Dietz said it is possible to assess before the project even starts on the basis of an estimated cost. Ms Bluml said her property has incurred damage because of the temporary sewer pipes across the lot, areas of the curb and street are damaged, and they cannot build their house until the sewer pipes are removed. City Attorney Pauly said the assessment on this lot could be deferred since the property is obviously undeveloped. Anderson said the people in this area should have some alternatives because of the situation there. Pidcock noted it would be listed as a pending assessment and Ms Bluml would then be required to pay it off by the mortgage company. Bentley said there is an obvious inequity when owners in this situation are forced to pay the entire amount while the other property owners are allowed 20 years in which to pay it off. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt that portion of Resolution No. 87-254 relating to project I.C. 52-101, a 20 year assessment at 8% interest, except that the following properties will be excluded from the assess- ment rolls for a period of five years or until development: PID 35-116-22-13-0017 and PID 35-116-22-13-0031 . Motion carried unanimously. A discussion followed regarding how this would affect Mr. Brown. Bentley suggested that Mr. Brown and his i City Council Minutes -11- September 8, 1987 attorney meet with Mr. Pauly to see if some sort of alternative could be arrived at before final approval of Resolution No. 87-254. 10. I.C. 52-102: Sidewalk, Bikeway, Storm Sewer and Street Improvements on Dell Road and in Hidden Glen 3rd Addition. Dietz reviewed the improvements completed and the method by which the assessments were determined. He said the improvements are not yet complete but Staff is proposing that a partial assessment be levied for project costs through July 1, 1987 with the balance to be assessed next year. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt that portion of I.C. 84-254 relating to project I.C. 52- 102, a five year assessment at 8% interest. Motion carried unanimously. 11. Supplemental Assessments: Trunk Sewer and Water, Subtrunk Sewer. and Water, Tree Removal, Weed Removal, Connection Fee, Reassessment of Chatham Woods. Dietz reviewed the assessments for Trunk Sewer and Water He noted that an error may have been made on PID 02-116-22- 41-0002 and that will be checked further by Staff. He said the assessment on PID 05-116-22-44-0021 should be deleted from this list and added to next year's assessment rolls. Harris asked why the interest rates vary on these assess • - ments. Dietz said funds for the two projects at 11% interest • were expended two or three years ago when interest rates were higher. James Brown, 11551 Riverview Road, said he was notified of his $24,000 assessment last week. He said he didn't know there would be an assessment. Dietz said Staff could review the notification process on this and get back at the next meeting. Peterson said he would like to know about the relationship between Mr. Hustad and Mr. Brown as to whether the assessment was calculated into the value of the lot. Kevin Bluml, 10540 W. Riverview Drive, asked if this assessment relates to the storm sewer assessment. Dietz said the trunk sewer assessment is a flat rate based on acreage. Mr. Bluml noted they had explained the status of their lot during the discussion of I.C. 52-101. City Council Minutes -12- September 8, 1987 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to adopt that portion of Resolution No. 87-254 relating to the Trunk Sewer & Water assessments, except that assessments on the following properties will be continued to the September 15th meeting: PID 02-116-22-41-0002; PID 36-116-22-22-0007; and, except that the following properties will be excluded from the assessment rolls for a period of five years or until development: PID 35-116-22-13-0017; PID 35-116-22- 13-0031. Motion carried unanimously. Dietz reviewed the supplemental assessments for Subtrunk Sewer and Water. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to adopt that portion of Resolution No. 87-254 relating to the Subtrunk Sewer and Water assessments. Motion carried unanimously. Dietz reviewed the supplemental assessments for tree removal. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt that portion of Resolution No. 87-254 relating to the Tree Removal assessments. Motion carried unanimously. Dietz reviewed the supplemental assessments for Weed Removal. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt that portion of Resolution No. 87-254 relating to the Weed Removal assessments. Motion carried unanimously. Dietz reviewed the supplemental assessments for Connec- tion Fee. He noted there was a request from Mr. Holand that PID 26-116-22-41-0040 be deleted from the list and assessed in 1988. David Holand, 11231 Creekridge Drive, said there is no stub in the street to hook up to. He said a project on the east side of the property will give him access and that will be completed and assessed next year. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt 1 that portion of Resolution No. 87-254 relating to Connection Fee, except that PID 26-116-22-41-0040 will City Council Minutes -13- September 8, 1987 be deleted from the assessment rolls. Motion carried unanimously. Dietz reviewed the supplemental assessments for the Reassessment of Chatham Woods. He noted the parcels listed were purchased by new owners after the project went tax forfeit. He said he believed each of the purchasers was aware of this type of pending assess- ment. Dennis Wilson, the owner of PID 05-116-22-21-0016, said the County told him the property would be reassessed at the end of the ten-year period. He also said the amount of interest quoted was 8%, not 12%. City Attorney Pauly said, while the County is charging Mr. Wilson 8% interest, this assessment is being levied on the basis of the interest costs that the City incurred at the time the improvements went in. Harris asked if the County pays a lump sum to the City. Dietz said he thought the City was paid in a lump sum at the time of closing. Harris said she thought this is a critical point. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to continue that portion of Resolution No. 87-254 pertaining to Reassessment of Chatham Woods to the September 15th meeting. Motion carried unanimously. II. OTHER BUSINESS City Manager Jullie asked the Councilmembers to consider reim- bursing the Fire and Police reserves for their efforts during the storm situation. He suggested that an amount not to exceed $3,000 be appropriated from the reserve. Peterson said he had no problem with that but would also like to consider an annual contribution on a per-person basis to a specific function. Bentley said Mr. Dietz and his department should be compli- mented on an excellent job of putting this year's assessment material together, especially considering the complexity of the job and the extra pressure on Staff as a result of this summer's storm damage. III. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adjourn at 11:45 PM. Motion carried unanimously. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 1987 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Community Services Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: All members were present. PROCLAMATION FOR OBSERVANCE OF EDEN PRAIRIE "DAY OF PEACE" MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No. 87-262 proclaiming Eden Prairie Day of Peace. Motion carried unanimously. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following items were added to the Agenda: VII. B. Request from Olympic Hills for a Grading Permit; IX. A. Appointment of Doug Fell to Light Rail Transit Advisory Commission. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Agenda and Other Items of Business, as published and amended. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY AUGUST 4, 1987 (Continued from September 1, 1987) The following changes were made to the Minutes: Page 5, Paragraph 2, Sentence 2--change "constructed with street construction" to "constructed simultaneous with street construction"; Page 17, Paragraph 6, Sentences 1 and 2--change "Graph 3" to "Draft 3"; Page 18, Paragraph 6, Sentence 5--change "size and height might be" to "size and height indicated in Draft 3 might be". I City Council Minutes -2- September 15, 1987 MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, August 4, 1987, as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, AUGUST 18, 1987 The following changes were made to the Minutes: Page 15, Paragraph 2, Sentence 3--change "Board's part" to "Council's part"; Page 18, Paragraph 7, Sentence 2--change "tenure" to "tenor"; Page 20, Paragraph 2, Sentence 1--change the sentence to read "Harris said it's important to have the summary presented at the meeting since it outlines the City's role in the process and clarifies questions raised several times by people in the community as to what the Council is doing"; Page 20, Paragraph 5, Sentence 1-- change the sentence to read "Harris said any review of that nature should include legal review of recent court opinions regarding governmental restraints on use of real property"; Page 21, Paragraph 1, Sentence 1--change the sentence to read "Jullie suggested deferring this item to let Staff come back in a couple of weeks with a preliminary report addressing the issues of the growth process". MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, August 18, 1987, as published and amended. Motion carried unanimously. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List B. Request from Robert Bjorkland, President of New Concept Homes, for naming of Park C. Final Plat approval for Eden Pointe (south of County Road #1 and east of Homeward Hills Road) Resolution No. 87-255 D. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 47-87 amending City Code Sec- tion 2.18, which regulates the terms for the Historical & Cultural Commission E. Receive petition for street and utility improvements within Columbine Road right-of-way and authorize preparation of a Feasibility Study, I.C. 52-130 (Resolution No. 87-261) 4 City Council Minutes -3- September 15, 1987 F. ESPECIALLY FOR CHILDREN. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 38-87-PUD-8-87, PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment within the Neighborhood Commercial District; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Especially for Child- ren; and Adoption of Resolution No. 87-247, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 37-87-PUD-8-87, and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 1.29 acres for construction of a day care facility. Location, South of Townline Road, east of Dell Road. (Ordinance No. 38-87-PUD-8-87, PUD District and Zoning District Amendment; Resolution No. 87-247, Authorizing Summary and Publication) G. Receive 100% petition for street and utility improvements for Wyndham Crest Addition and authorize preparation of plans and specifications, I.C. 52-129 (Resolution No. 87- 259) H. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 48-87, renaming Appaloosa Lane to Tree Farm Road MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris, to approve Items A - H on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ROGER'S BODY SHOP, INC., by Roger L. Lindeman. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 on 1.68 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, and Preliminary Plat of 1.91 acres into one lot and road right- of-way for construction of an auto body shop. Locations Highway #169 across from the Hennepin County Vocational Technical School. (Ordinance #44-87, Rezoning; Resolution #87-249, Preliminary Plat) Continued from September 1, 1987 City Attorney Jullie called attention to the letter of September 15th from proponent requesting a two-week continuance. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to continue this item to the October 6, 1987 meeting. Motion carried unanimously. B. BLUESTEM HILLS 4TH ADDITION, by Brown Land Company. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 15.94 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 15.94 acres with variances, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 10.57 acres with Shoreland variance to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Zoning District Amendment within the R1-13.5 District on 5.36 acres, and City Council Minutes -4- September 15, 1987 Preliminary Plat of 15.94 acres into 27 single family lots, 3 outlots, and road right-of-way. Location: West of Bennett Place and Bluestem Lane. (Resolution #87-250, PUD Concept; Ordinance #45-87-PUD-11-87, PUD District and Zoning District Change; Resolution #87-251, Preliminary Plat) Continued from September 1, 1987 City Manager Jullie called attention to the letter dated September 15, 1987, from proponent requesting a 60-day continuance. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to continue this item to the November 17th Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. C. FALL 1987 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING (Continued from September 8, 1987) Resolution No. 87-254 Director of Public Works Dietz reviewed the special assess- ment items continued from the September 8th meeting. 1. I.C. 51-272: Sidewalk, Bikeway, Storm Sewer and Street Improvements on Valley View Road from Mitchell Road to Eden Prairie Road Regarding I.C. 51-272, Dietz said two portions of this improvement were continued while the rest was approved. He said that after discussions with City Attorney Pauly, Staff recommends that the four parcels PID 09-116-22-14-0008 - PID 09-116-22-14-0011 be eliminated from the assessment rolls. New notices would be sent to all 120 units in the condominium development and a new Public Hearing date of October 6th would be set. Dietz said 122 notices were sent out for the September 8th meeting to the owners of condominiums in Village Green. He said notices are sent to taxpayers of record; and this may occasionally result in notices not catching up to the correct owner in cases of change of ownership. However, he said Staff believes the process was completed correctly and is recommending that the assessment be levied per the original amount. Peterson asked Dietz to review what happens when the notice is sent to a former owner. Dietz said the I notice is published in the newspaper; however, Staff I has no idea of who didn't receive the notices that were mailed out. He said it was likely that a number of the properties had a closing after the pending 9 1 City Council Minutes -5- September 15, 1987 assessment was put into effect. He noted that the developer may have escrowed some funds to pay the assessments. Mary Raabe, 14193 Bedford Drive, said there are 16 separate units for garages and they have been atempt- ing to identify who owns those. She said she would like to defer this a week or two to determine the ownership. Peterson asked if that information would affect the assessment. Dietz said the intention was to assess only the residential units, not the garage units. 2. I.C. 52-010D: Creek Crossing and Street Improvements on Technology Dr. from Prairie Center Dr. to West of Purgatory Creek Dietz said this improvement was adopted at the Septem- ber 8th meeting, but Mr. Feerick has requested that the assessment on the portion of the property on the north side of Technology Drive be deferred until development . He called attention to the letter from Mr. Feerick dated Septmeber 15th in which the defer- ment request was made. Dietz said this proposal would result in an assess- ment for PID 15-116-22-11-0003 of $30,275 and a deferment of $91,360 with interest until the construc- tion of improvements, but in any event the final pay- ment of the Special Assessment would be payable not more than 30 years hereafter. There were no comments from the audience. 3. I.C. 52-035: Additional Sanitary Sewer, Water, Storm Sewer and Street Improvements on Chestnut Drive East of Anderson Lakes Parkway Dietz said the assessments for this project were approved at the September 8th meeting. 4. I.C. 52-069: Storm Sewer Improvements on Riverview Road in the Bluffs West 1st, 2nd & 5th Additions Dietz said this entire item was continued from the October 8th meeting. He reviewed a graphic depicting properties included in the assessment district and those not included. For the Brandt property, he said Staff is proposing the 1/2 acre be assessed at $2,735.30 with the balance of $21,663.62 deferred until develop- ment or a five year maximum, with interest not to '?i 2 City Council Minutes -6- September 15, 1987 exceed 50% of the principal. He said Staff is propos- ing that 1/2 acre of the Laseski property be assessed at $2,735.30 with the balance of $79,049.54 deferred until development or a five year maximum, with interest not to exceed 50% of the principal. Peterson asked why a five-year maximum is proposed. Dietz said that seemed to be the direction the last meeting was going, and Mrs. Laseski had said she could not develop the property until 1990. Jullie noted that five years has been used in prior assessments. There were no comments from the audience. 5. I.C. 52-079: Street Paving on Crestwood Terrace from Dell Road to Pioneer Trail 6. I.C. 52-094: Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Improvements on Baker Road from 62nd Street to Roberts Drive Dietz said both these projects were approved last time. 7. I.C. 52-096: Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer and Street Improvments in the Bluffs East 4th Addition Dietz noted Exhibit A now includes the correct figures in the column for the 1993 amount. He said the project was approved at the last meeting. 8. I.C. 52-097: Sidewalk, Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer and Street Improvements on Dell Road and the Interior Street within Wyndham Knolls Dietz said this project was approved at the September 8th meeting. 9. I.C. 52-101: Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer and Street Improvements on East and West Riverview Dr. and within Bluffs West 5th Addition Dietz noted that requests for some sort of relief were received fromthe Blumls and Tom Brown. He said Staff recommends that an amount equal to the amount levied for sewer and water ($5,133.92) be deferred for each of those properties until 1993. There were no comments from the audience. 10. I.C. 52-102: Sidewalk, Bikeway, Storm Sewer & Street Improvements on Dell Road and in Hidden Glen 3rd Addition City Council Minutes -7- September 15, 1987 Dietz said this project was approved at the last meeting. 11. SUPPLEMENTALS TRUNK SEWER & WATER Dietz said Staff rechecked the area included in the assessment of Mr. Rusic's property after Mr. Rusic questioned the area included. He said the review reduced the assessment to $11,560. He said Mr. Rusic is satisfied that figure is correct. Dietz said the Brown and Bluml properties have been excluded for the five-year period. He said James Brown had requested more information about notification, etc. He said PID 35-116-22-27- 0007 is the underlying property for the Bluffs West 6th Addition. He said all information about the assessment was transferred to Wally Hustad so that an attempt was made to notify the responsible party. James Brown, 11551 Riverview Road, reviewed the history of the property. Peterson asked if he was objecting to the assessments. Brown said they are not objecting but feel they should have some relief for the two years while the City was deciding whether to purchase the property. Peterson said he would suggest Mr. Brown submit a written re- quest to the Council to consider such relief. REASSESSMENT OF CHATHAM WOODS Dietz said the entire reassessment of Chatham Woods was continued. He said there were two questions raised. The first question was that the purchasers received different information from the County. He said the County was aware that we are to be paid these assessments one year at a time and would receive 90% of each year's payment on that contract to retire the Special Assessment. Dietz said the other question was whether the interest should be 12% or 8%. He said all the original parcels paid 12%. City Attorney Pauly noted there is no cap on the interest rate now. A discussion followed re- garding the proper interest rate for the assessment. There were no comments from the audience. City Council Minutes -8- September 15, 1987 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing and to adopt Resolution No. 87-254 with changes indicated according to Exhibit A. Motion carried unanimously. D. Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements over part of Lots 1 and 3, Block 1, Prairie View Center (located north of Highway No. 3 and east of Prairie Center Drive) Resolu- tion No. 87-258 City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified. He said this is basically a housekeeping item. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris, to close the Public Hearing and to adopt Resolution No. 87-258, vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements on Lots 1 & 3, Block 1, Prairie View Center. Motion carried unanimously. V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 37202 - 37538 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Payment of Claims Nos. 37202 - 37538. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Harris, Pidcock and Peterson voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS There were none. VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Request from Beijing II Inc. City Manager Jullie referred to the letter of August 5, 1987 from Mel Kurnow of Beijing II Inc. which requested the Council to consider amending the City Code to allow the serving of strong beer at restaurants that now serve wine and 3.2 beer in order to be consistent with the Minnesota State statute. Jullie said he had discussed this with Public Safety staff and they have no objection. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to refer this to Staff for the purpose of preparing an ordinance to amend the City Code. Bentley suggested that any such amendment should contain a provision whereby the owner of such establishment must indicate to the patrons that they are serving strong beer. A discussion followed regarding such a provision. City Council Minutes -9- September 15, 1987 VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously. B. Request from Olympic Hills for a Grading Permit City Manager Jullie said Olympic Hills Golf Course suf- fered some major damage because of standing water. He said they want to change some of the fairways to raise them up out of the floodplain. Director of Public Works Dietz said they are planning to regrade three holes. The material would all come from within the golf course. He said the regrading of two of the holes will require approval by the Watershed District. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the request of Olympic Hills for regrading of the fair- ways. Motion carried unanimously. IX. APPOINTMENTS A. Appointment of Douce Fell to LLEht Rail Transit Advisory Commission MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to appoint Mr. Doug Fell to the Light Rail Transit Advisory Commis- sion. Motion carried unanimously. A discussion followed regarding light rail transit and the advisory commission. X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Set Special City Council meeting for Tuesday, Septem- ber 22, 1987, 7:30 PM, to consider the City Budget MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to set a Special City Council meeting for Tuesday, September 22, 1987 at 7:30 PM to consider the City Budget. Motion carried unanimously. B. Report of City Manager 1. Award Contract for construction of Fire Stations Continued from September 1, 1987) City Manager Jullie reviewed the Staff memo of Sep- tember 15, 1987 on the bids for fire station construc- tion. City Council Minutes -10- September 15, 1987 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to accept the Staff recommendation to reject all bids and authorize preparation of revised plans and speci- fications and advertisement for bids, as outlined in Alternative 6 of the memo. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Scheduling for Strategic Planning City Manager Jullie referred to the Staff memo of September 10, 1987 which presented a proposed Strategic Plan Schedule. After discussion of the proposed schedule and Council- member's own schedules, the consensus was to return to Staff for alternate dates. C. Report of City Attorney There was no report. D. Report of Director of Planning There was none. E. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Request from Stan Tekiela Director of Community Services Lambert reviewed his memo of August 11, 1987 with the attached request from Stan Tekiela that the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission and the City Council consider asking the County to donate to the City a 34.08 acre parcel of land off Birch Island Road for an addition to Birch Island Park. Lambert said Mr. Tekiela hopes that such an action would decrease the practice of dumping trash there. He said the Parks Commission reviewed this and recom- mended approval. Anderson said he concurs with that recommendation and noted that parcel contains unique hardwoods. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to direct Staff to prepare a formal request to the County for consideration of transfer of ownership of the parcel to the City for park purposes. Peterson asked if acquiring this parcel would result in considerable additional maintenance costs. Lambert City Council Minutes -11- September 15, 1987 • said he didn't think so as we are now hauling out the trash that is dumped there. VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously. 2. Request to approve plans and specifications and to authorize advertisement for bids for Community Center part ial repair Referring to his memo of September 10, 1987, Director of Community Services Lambert said Staff is concerned over going through another winter with the condition of the Community Center because of the damage from water coming through the walls. He said the plans and specifications for repairs have been prepared and they are ready to go out for bids. Wally Daniels, Architect from Setter, Leach & Lindstrom, reviewed the plans and specifications for the repairs. He said the estimated cost for the first phase repair is $340,000 for brick and $325,000 for block, plus $65,000 for architectural fees. Mr. Daniels noted that only the outside layer of block will need to be replaced. He said painting of the inside walls will require the pool to be shut down and drained and they are proposing November 2 - 23 as the dates for that repair. Peterson asked if Daniels was proposing the use of block and not brick. Daniels said the base bid is for all concrete block in order that the repair not be considered an improvement in light of the current litigation. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the plans and specifications and to authorize advertisement for bids for partial repair of the Community Center. Pidcock asked why we are trying concrete block again when we had so much trouble with it the first time. Daniels said the existing concrete block is a light- weight concrete block and that caused the problems. Lambert noted that light-weight concrete block is generally used for interior walls and standard weight for exterior. He said the bid is for standard con- crete block or an alternate which would be brick. City Council Minutes -12- September 15, 1987 Peterson noted that we will get bids for block and for the alternate of brick and will then select one. Lambert said we need the block bid in order to have an actual cost for our litigation. VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously. XI. NEW BUSINESS There was none. XII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adjourn the meeting at 9:20 PM. Motion carried unanimously. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA (' RESOLUTION 87-254 RESOLUTION APPROVING 1988 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections in the proposed assessments for the following improvements to wit: i. (See Exhibit A attached) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such proposed assessments are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands in the final assessment rolls, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of years as shown on Exhibit A. Installments shall bear interest at the rates shown on Exhibit A, commencing January 1, 1988. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid on or before November 15, 1987. 3. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes beginning in 1988. 4. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvements but not herein assessed for the improvement when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 5. The assessment data of Resolution No. 87-225 is herein revised in accordance with Exhibit A attached hereto. ADOPTED BY THE Eden Prairie City Council on September 8, 1987 and September 15, 1987. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor Jj ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 1. I.C. 51-272 p Sidewalk, Bikeway, Storm Sewer Project Cost: $2,500,000.00 k and Street Improvements on Valley View Road from Mitchell City Share: $1,945,868.00 Road to Eden Prairie Road Net Assessment: $ 553,132.00 20 Years at 8% Single Family Rate = $33.00 Front Foot Golf Course Rate = $67.00 Front Foot Multi-Family Rate = $71.00 Front Foot Underpass 72,421,88 09-116-22-11-0003 Sewer & Water 18,325.20 09-116-22-11-0003 IN . 1993 1988 I.C.A PID# RA E YEARS $AMOUNT ($AMOUNT) 51-272 04-116-22-44-0011 20 --- (23,075.00) 51-272 08-116-22-41-0003 20 --- (6,930.00) 51-272 08-116-22-41-0004 20 --- (3,432.00) 51-272 08-116-22-41-0005 20 --- (3,465.00) 51-272 08-116-22-41-0006 20 --- (6,765.00) 51-272 08-116-22-41-0059 20 --- (3,600.00) 51-272 08-116-22-41-0062 20 --- (3,135.00) 51-272 08-116-22-41-0063 20 --- (3,135.00) 51-272 09-116-22-11-0003 20 --- (124,113.08) 51-272 09-116-22-13-0005 20 --- (34,151.00) 51-272 09-116-22-14-0012 20 --- (46,911.00) 51-272 09-116-22-23-0001 20 --- (2,970.00) 51-272 09-116-22-23-0002 20 --- (3,600.00) 51-272 09-116-22-23-0003 20 --- (3,600.00) 51-272 09-116-22-23-0005 20 --- (623.82) 51-272 09-116-22-23-0006 20 --- (623.82) 51-272 09-116-22-23-0007 20 --- (623.82) 51-272 09-116-22-23-0008 20 --- (623.82) 51-272 09-116-22-23-0009 20 --- (623.82) 51-272 09-116-22-23-0010 20 --- (623.82) 51-272 09-116-22-23-0011 20 --- (623.82) 51-272 09-116-22-23-0012 20 --- (623.82) 51-272 09-116-22-23-0013 20 --- (623.82) 51-272 09-116-22-23-0014 20 --- (623.82) 51-272 09-116-22-23-0015 20 --- (623.82) 1 51-272 09-116-22-23-0016 20 --- (623.82) 5I-272 09-116-22-23-0017 20 --- (623.82) 51-272 09-116-22-23-0018 20 --- (623.82) 51-272 09-116-22-23-0019 20 --- (623.82) 51-272 09-116-22-23-0020 20 --- (22,457.64) 51-272 09-116-22-23-0021 20 --- (2,143.88) 51-272 09-116-22-24-0004 20 --- (623.82) 51-272 09-116-22-24-0005 20 --- (623.82) 51-272 09-116-22-24-0006 20 --- (623.82) 51-272 09-116-22-32-0001 20 --- (6,732.00) 51-272 09-116-22-32-0005 20 --- (7,200.00) : 51-272 09-116-22-32-0006 20 --- (4,554.00) 51-272 09-116-22-32-0051 20 --- (6,666.00) 51-272 09-116-22-41-0002 20 --- (37,955.50) 51-272 09-116-22-42-0002 20 --- (32,035.20) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0004 20 --- (99,613.00) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0090 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0091 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0092 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0093 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0094 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0095 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0096 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0097 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0098 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0099 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0100 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0101 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0102 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0103 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0104 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0105 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0106 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0107 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0108 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0109 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0110 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0111 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0112 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0113 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0114 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0115 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0116 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0117 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0118 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0119 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0120 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0121 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0122 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0123 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0124 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0125 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0126 20 --- (267.70) • 51-272 10-116-22-23-0127 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0128 20 --- (267.70) i i `{j i 51-272 10-116-22-23-0129 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0130 20 ___ (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0131 20 (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0132 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0133 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0134 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0135 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0145 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0146 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0147 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0148 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0149 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0150 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0153 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0154 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0155 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0156 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0157 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0158 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0163 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0164 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0165 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0166 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0167 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0168 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0170 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0171 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0172 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0173 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0174 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0175 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0179 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0180 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0181 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0182 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0184 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0185 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0186 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0189 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0190 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0191 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0192 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0193 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0194 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0195 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0196 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0197 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0198 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0199 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0200 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0201 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0202 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0203 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0204 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0205 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0206 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0207 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0208 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0209 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0214 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0215 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0216 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0217 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0218 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0219 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0221 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-1I6-22-23-0222 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0223 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 I0-1I6-22-23-0224 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0225 20 (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0226 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0027 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0228 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0229 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0230 20 --- (267.70) 5I-272 10-116-22-23-0231 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0232 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0233 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0234 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0235 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0236 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0237 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-23-0238 20 --- (267.70) 51-272 10-116-22-32-0049 20 --- (11,725.00) I 1 i 2!.7 Y 2. I.C. 52-0100 Creek Crossing and Street Project Cost: $783,599.00 Improvements on Technology Dr. from Prairie Center Dr. to City Share: $463,850.00 West of Purgatory Creek Net Assessment: $319,749.00 20 Years at 8% $251,369.00 : 2325 Front Foot = $108.12/Front Foot INT. 1993 1988 I.C.4 PID# RATE YEARS $AMOUNT ($AMOUNT) 52-010D 15-116-22-11-0003 8 20 --- (121,635.00)* 52-010D 15-116-22-12-0001 8 2D --- (102,714.00) 52-010D 15-116-22-13-0001 8 20 --- (27,030.00) * Assess $30,275 Defer $91,360 with interest until development (no cap on interest) SSE i 3. I.C.. 52-035 ( Additional Sanitary Sewer, Water, Project Cost: $ 15,502.00 Storm Sewer and Street Improvements on Chestnut Drive.East of Anderson City Share $ --- Lakes Parkway Net Assessment: $ 15,502.00 17 years at 8% $15,502.00 : 2871 Acre = $539.95/Acre IN . 1993 1988 I.C.A PID# RA E YEARS $AMOUNT ($AMOUNT) 52-035 15-116-22-34-0D27 17 --- (2,586.36) 52-035 15-116-22-31-0D04 17 --- (755.93) 52-035 15-116-22-34-0028 17 --- (1,884.43) 52-035 15-116-22-34-0029 17 --- (3,612.27) 52-035 15-116-22-31-0005 17 (2,510.77) 52-035 15-116-22-31-0006 17 --- (4,152.24) 4. I.C. 52-069 ( Storm Sewer Improvements on Project Cost: $268,388.00 Riverview Road in the Bluffs West 1st, 2nd & 5th Additions City Share: $ --- Net Assessment: $268,388.00 20 Years at 8% $268,388.00 : 49.06 Acres = $5,470.61/Acre INT. 1993 1988 I.C.fl PID# RA E YEARS $AMOUNT ($AMO NT) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0039 20 --- (656.47) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0040 20 --- (1,477.07) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0041 20 --- (4,540.61) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0042 20 --- (1,969.42) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0043 20 --- (1,094.12) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0044 20 --- (820.59) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0045 20 --- (875.30) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0046 20 --- (1,094.12) S. 52-069 35-116-22-12-0061 20 --- (1,477.07) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0062 20 --- (1,750.60) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0063 20 --- (1,148.83) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0064 20 --- (656.47) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0067 20 --- (547.06) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0068 20 --- (711.18) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0069 20 --- (328.24) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0070 20 --- (1,312.95) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0071 20 --- (2,078.83) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0072 20 --- (1,477.09) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0073 20 --- (1,148.83) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0074 20 --- (1,695.89) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0075 20 --- (492.35) 52-069 35-116-22-12-0083 20 --- (7,111.79) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0002 20 --- (820.59) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0007 20 --- (437.65) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0008 20 --- (492.35) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0009 20 --- (109.41) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0016 20 --- (547.06) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0017 20 --- (109.41) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0019 20 --- (1,641.18) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0020 20 --- (1,695.89) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0021 20 --- (1,695.89) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0022 20 --- (1,695.89) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0023 20 --- (1,258.24) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0024 20 --- (820.59) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0029 20 --- (54.71) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0030 20 --- (765.89) i 1 52-069 35-116-22-21-0001 20 --- (2,188.24) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0021 20 --- (218.82) t 52-069 35-116-22-21-0022 20 --- (711.18) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0023 20 --- (656.47) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0024 20 --- (875.30) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0025 20 --- (711.18) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0026 20 --- (601.77) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0027 20 --- (656.47) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0028 20 --- (273.53) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0029 20 --- (1,367.65) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0030 20 --- (1,422.36) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0031 20 --- (1,258.24) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0032 20 --- (1,860.01) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0033 20 --- (1,805.30) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0034 20 --- (1,531.77) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0035 20 --- (1,860.01) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0036 20 --- (1,805.30) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0037 20 --- (1,586.48) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0038 20 --- (1,969.42) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0039 20 --- (1,695.89) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0040 20 --- (1,805.30) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0106 20 --- (437.65) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0107 20 --- (820.59) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0108 20 --- (1,531.77) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0109 20 --- (711.18) 52-069 35-116-22-21-0110 20 --- (273.53) 52-069 35-116-22-23-0011 20 --- (765.89) 52-069 35-116-22-23-0012 20 --- (1,914.71) 52-069 35-116-22-23-0013 20 --- (15,591.24) 52-069 23-116-22-24-0001 20 --- (23,797.15)** 52-069 35-116-22-24-0002 20 --- (38,622.51)** 52-069 35-116-22-24-0005 20 --- (1,258.24) 52-069 35-116-22-24-0007 20 --- (1,477.09) 52-069 35-116-22-24-0008 20 --- (1,586.48) 52-069 35-116-22-24-0009 20 --- (2,078.83) 52-069 35-116-22-24-0010 20 --- (24,398.92)* 52-069 35-116-22-24-0011 20 --- (19,365.18)** 52-069 35-116-22-13-0034 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0035 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0036 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0037 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0038 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0039 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0040 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0041 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0042 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0043 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0044 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0045 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0046 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0047 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0048 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0049 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0050 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0051 20 --- (1,990.17) i 52-069 35-116-22-13-0052 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0053 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0054 20 --- (1,990.17) ( 52-069 35-116-22-13-0055 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0056 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0057 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0058 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0059 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0060 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0061 20 --- (1,990.17) 52-069 35-116-22-13-0062 20 --- (1,990.17) * Assess 1/2 Acre at $2,735.30 Defer balance ($21,663.62) until development or 5 yrs maximum (interest not to exceed 50% of principal) ** Assess 1/2 Acre at $2,735.30 Defer balance ($79,049.54) until development or 5 yrs maximum (interest not to exceed 50% of principal) 1 5. I.C. 52-079 Street Paving on Crestwood Terrace Project Cost: $ 21,145.00 from Dell Road to, Pioneer Trail City Share: $ --- Net Assessment: $ 21,145.00 5 Years at 8% $21,145.00 : 55 Lots = $384.45/Lot IN . 1993 1988 I.C.# PIDA RA E YEARS $AMOUNT ($AMOUNT) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0002 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0003 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0004 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0001 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0005 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0006 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0007 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0008 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0009 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0010 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0011 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0012 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0013 5 --- (384.45) ( 52-079 30-116-22-13-0014 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0015 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0016 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0019 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0020 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0021 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0022 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0023 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-13-0024 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-21-0006 5 --- (768.95) 52-079 30-116-22-24-0002 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-1I6-22-24-0003 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-24-0005 5 --- (768.95) 52-079 30-116-22-24-0006 5 --- (768.95) 52-079 30-116-22-24-0007 5 --- (768.95) 52-079 30-116-22-24-0008 5 --- (768.95) 52-079 30-116-22-42-0001 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-42-0002 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-42-0003 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-42-0004 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-I16-22-42-0005 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-42-0006 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-42-0007 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-42-0008 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-42-0009 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-42-0010 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-42-0011 5 --- (384.45) i J. i 1 i 52-079 30-116-22-42-0012 8 5 --- (384.45 I 52-079 30-116-22-42-0013 8 5 (384.45� 52-079 30-116-22-42-0014 8 5 (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-42-0015 8 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-42-0016 8 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-42-0017 8 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-42-0018 8 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-42-0019 8 5 --- (384.45 52-079 30-116-22-42-0020 8 5 --- (384.45) 52-079 30-116-22-42-0021 8 5 --- (384.45) 1 6. I.C. 52-094 Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Improvements Project Cost: $ 67,543.00 on Baker Road from•62nd Street to Roberts Drive City Share: $ --- Net Assessment: $ 67,543.00 20 Years at 8% Sanitary Sewer $53,014.50 : 30.02 Acre = $1,765.97/Acre Watermain $14,528.5D : 14.94 Acre = $ 972.46/Acre IN . 1993 1988 I.C.. PID# RA E YEARS $AMOUNT ($AMOUNT) 52-094 03-116-22-12-0001 20 --- (11,302.21) 52-094 03-116-22-12-0438 20 --- (23,961.27) 52-094 03-116-22-12-0005 20 --- (16,950.82) 52-094 03-116-22-13-0003 20 --- (8,229.42) 52-094 03-116-22-14-0001 20 --- (7,099.28) 1 7. I.C. 52-096 Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer Project Cost: $1,181,328.00 and Street Improvements in the Bluffs East 4th Addition City Share: $ 35,043.74 Net Assessment: $I,146,252.00 5 Years at 8% 20 Years at 8% Subtrunk Sewer $45,850.08 : 158.52 Acre = $ 289.24/Acre Lateral Sewer 37,826.32 : 22.89 Acre = $I,652.53/Acre Lateral Sewer 48,142.58 : 19.20 Acre = $2,507.43/Acre (Bluffs East 4th) Lateral Watermain 83,676.40 : 42.09 Acre = $1,988.04/Acre Storm Sewer 171,937.80 : 41.76 Acre = $4,117.28/Acre Franlo Road 29,802.55 : 640 Feet = $ 46.57/Feet Bluffs East 4th Utilities 676,288.68 : 60 Lots = $11,271.48/Lot Sanitary Sewer $3,832.30/Lot Water 2,254.30/Lot Storm 2,479.72/Lot Street 2,705.16/Lot Grading Additions $32,095.05 to 36-116-22-12-0005 $20,632.54 to 36-116-22-11-0006 IN . 1993 1988 I.C.# PID# RA E YEARS $AMOUNT ($AMOUNT) 52-096 25-116-22-34-0052 5 --- (50,877.45) 52-096 25-116-22-43-0090 20 --- (1,893.95) 52-096 36-116-22-I1-0001 20 6,680.68 --- 52-096 36-116-22-11-0002 20 --- (18,666.60) 52-096 36-116-22-11-0003 20 2,436.49 52-096 36-I16-22-11-0004 20 --- (7,191.55) 52-096 36-116-22-11-0006 20 --- (54,035.93) 52-096 36-116-22-11-0007 2D --- (21,574.56) 52-096 36-116-22-12-0002 20 --- (11,404.53) 52-096 36-1I6-22-12-0003 20 --- (II,433.45) 52-096 36-116-22-12-0005 5 --- (460,842.47) 52-096 36-116-22-13-0001 20 --- (11,456.59) 52-096 36-116-22-13-0002 20 156.19 --- 52-096 36-116-22-13-0003 20 144.62 --- 52-096 36-116-22-13-0004 20 167.76 52-096 36-116-22-13-0005 20 --- (176.44) 52-096 36-116-22-13-0006 20 --- (130.16) 52-096 36-116-22-13-0007 20 --- (153.30) 52-096 36-1I6-22-13-0008 20 --- (124.37) s 52-096 36-116-22-13-0009 20 --- (147.51) 52-096 36-116-22-13-0010 20 --- (156.19) 52-096 36-116-22-13-0011 20 179.33 --- 52-096 36-116-22-13-0012 20 164.87 --- 52-096 36-116-22-13-0013 20 156.19 --- 52-096 36-116-22-13-0014 20 185.11 --- 52-096 36-116-22-13-0015 20 156.19 --- 52-096 36-116-22-13-0016 20 161.97 --- 52-096 36-116-22-13-0017 20 159.08 --- 52-096 36-116-22-13-0018 20 161.97 --- 52-096 36-116-22-13-0019 20 --- (63.63) 52-096 36-116-22-13-0020 20 --- (303.70) 52-096 36-116-22-13-0022 20 --- (312.38) 52-096 36-116-22-13-0023 20 --- (1,104.90) 52-096 36-116-22-13-0025 20 --- (1,576.36) 52-096 36-116-22-13-0027 20 --- (11.57) 52-096 36-116-22-14-0001 20 665.25 --- 52-096 36-116-22-14-0002 20 242.96 --- 52-096 36-116-22-14-0003 20 --- (7,187.61) 52-096 36-116-22-14-0004 20 240.07 --- 52-096 36-116-22-14-0005 20 240.07 --- 52-096 36-116-22-14-0006 20 1,799.07 --- 52-096 36-116-22-21-0001 5 --- (418,393.65) 52-096 36-116-22-21-0002 5 --- (52,286.17) 52-096 36-116-22-22-0002 20 649.11 --- 1I 8. I.C. 52-097 ( Sidewalk, Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Project Cost: $ 706,601.00 Storm Sewer and Street Improvements on Dell Road and the Interior Street City Share: $ 181,933.18* within Wyndham Knolls Net Assessment: $ 558,747.00 5 Years at 8% * Includes $97,854.00 collected from 1st and 2nd Addition $558,747.00 : 50 Lots = $11,174.94/Lot INT. 1993 1988 I.C.I PIO# RATE YEARS SAMOUNT ($AMOUNT) 52-097 06-116-22-23-0091 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-23-0092 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-23-0093 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0003 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0004 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0005 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0006 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0007 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0008 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0009 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0010 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0011 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0012 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0013 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0014 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0015 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0016 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0017 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0018 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0019 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0020 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0021 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0022 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0023 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0024 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0025 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0026 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0027 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0028 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0029 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0030 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0031 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0032 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0033 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0034 5 --- (11,174.94) T 52-097 06-116-22-24-0035 8 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0036 8 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0037 8 5 (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0038 8 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0039 8 5 (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0040 8 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0041 8 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0042 8 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0043 8 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0044 8 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0045 8 5 --- (11,174.94) 52-097 06-116-22-24-0046 8 5 --- (11,174.94) '1 9. I.C. 52-101 Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer Project Cost: $417,076.00 and Street Improvements on East and West Riverview Dr. and within Bluffs City Share: $ 9,032.00 West 5th Addition Net Assessment: $408,044.00 20 Years at 8% • (Bluffs West 5th & Lots East of Concord Drive) $408,044.00 - $116,114.85 = $291,929.15 : 29 Lots = $10,066.52/Lot $116,114.85 : 1,479.17 = $78.50/Front Foot $38.46/F.F. Streets $18.84/F.F. Sanitary Sewer $21.20/F.F. Watermain INT. 1993 1988 I.C.# PID# RATE YEARS $AMOUNT ($AMOUNT) 52-101 35-116-22-I3-0002 8 20 5,133.92 (4,932.60) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0003 8 20 5,133.92 (4,932.60) 52-10I 35-116-22-13-0005 8 20 5,133.92 (4,932.60) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0007 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0008 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0009 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0010 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0011 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0014 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0015 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0016 8 20 5,133.92 (4,932.60) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0017 8 20 5,133.92 (4,932.60) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0031 8 20 5,133.92 (4,932.60) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0034 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0035 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0036 B 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0037 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0038 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0043 B 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0044 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0045 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0046 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 36-116-22-13-0047 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0048 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0049 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0050 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0051 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0052 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-13-0053 8 20 --- (10,066.52) 52-101 35-116-22-21-0001 8 20 9,332.53 (8,964.26) 52-101 35-116-22-21-0003 8 20 1,321.32 (1,269.18) 52-101 35-116-22-21-0003 8 20 --- (11,645.47) 2 52-101 35-116-22-21-0033 8 20 --- (10,599.07) 52-101 35-116-22-21-0040 8 20 --- (12,488.57) 52-101 35-116-22-24-0001 8 20 10,315.51 (9,908.45) 52-101 35-116-22-24-0002 8 20 16,016.00 (15,384.00) 52-101 35-116-22-24-0011 8 20 4,517.30 (4,353.26) 4 10. I.C. 52-102 Sidewalk, Bikeway, Storm Sewer & Project Cost: $681,725.00 Street Improvements on Dell Road (Thru 7/1/87) and in Hidden Glen 3rd Addition City Share: --- + Transfer From 52-097 $ 33,524.82 Net Assessment: $715,249.B2 5 Years at 8% $715,249.B2 : 117 Units = $6113.25/Unit INT. 1993 1988 I.C.# PID# RATE YEARS $AMOUNT ($AMOUNT) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0089 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0090 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0091 B 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0092 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0093 B 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0094 8 5 --- (6,112.82) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0077 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0078 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0079 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0080 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0081 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0082 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0083 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0084 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-DD85 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0086 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0087 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0088 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0063 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0064 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0065 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0066 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0067 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0068 B 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-I16-22-22-0069 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0070 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0071 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-I16-22-22-0072 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0D73 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0074 8 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0075 8 5 (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-D076 8 5 i 52-102 06-116-22-22-0047 8 5 --- (6,113.25) i {6,113.25) 52-102 06-I16-22-22-0048 8 5 --- 1 52-102 06-116-22-22-0049 8 5 (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0050 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0051 5 --- (6,113.25) ( 52-102 06-116-22-22-0052 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0053 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0054 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0055 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0056 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0057 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0058 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0059 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0060 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0061 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0062 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0028 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0029 5 --- (9,169.88) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0030 5 --- (9,169.88) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0031 5 --- (9,169.88) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0032 5 --- (9,169.88) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0033 5 --- (9,169.88) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0034 5 --- (9,169.88) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0035 5 --- (9,169.88) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0036 5 --- (9,169.88) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0037 5 --- (9,169.88) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0038 5 --- (9,169.88) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0039 5 --- (9,169.88) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0040 5 --- (9,169.88) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0041 5 --- (9,169.88) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0042 5 --- (9,169.88) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0043 5 --- (9,169.88) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0044 5 --- (9,169.88) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0045 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0046 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0004 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0005 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0006 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0007 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0008 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0009 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0010 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0012 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0013 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0014 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0015 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0016 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0017 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0018 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0019 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0020 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0021 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0022 5 --- (16,302.00) 52-102 06-116-22-21-0023 5 --- (32,604.00) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0014 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0015 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0016 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0017 5 --- (6,113.25) 1 a i 52-102 06-116-22-22-0018 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0019 5 (6,113.25) ( 52-102 06-116-22-22-0020 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0021 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0022 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0023 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0024 5 --- (6,113.25) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0025 5 --- (9,169.88) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0026 5 --- (9,169.88) 52-102 06-116-22-22-0027 5 --- (9,169.88) 11. SUPPLEMENTALS Trunk Sewer and Water $679,373.97 ( Subtrunk Sewer and Water $ 9,900.34 Tree Removal $ 3,613.00 Weed Removal $ 268,75 Connection Fee $ 22,200.00 Reassessment of Chatham Woods $113,294.30 INT. 1993 1988 I.C.# PID# RATE YEARS $AMOUNT ($AMOUNT) TRUNK SEWER & WATER TS&W 02-116-22-13-0004 11 20 - (12,188.80) TS&W 02-116-22-41-0002 11 20 - (11,560.00) TS&W 02-116-22-22-0D01 20 - (103,798.00) TS&W 03-116-22-12-0005 20 - (15,200.00) TS&W 04-116-22-11-0005 20 - (5,304.00) TS&W 05-116-22-13-0004 20 - (4,641.00) TS&W 06-116-22-13-0002 20 - (34,770.00) TS&W 07-116-22-32-0064 20 - (520.00) TS&W 07-116-22-42-0022 20 - (21,147.00) TS&W 08-116-22-14-0031 20 - (1,468.00) TS&W 08-116-22-41-0006 20 - (988.95) TS&W 16-116-22-41-0001 20 - (883.00) TS&W 16-116-22-32-0055 20 - (2,191.54) TS&W 16-116-22-32-0056 20 - (2,191.54) TS&W 16-116-22-33-0006 20 - (2,191.54 TS&W 16-116-22-33-0007 20 - (2,191.54) TS&W 16-116-22-33-0008 20 - (2,191.54) TS&W 16-116-22-33-0009 20 - (2,191.54) TS&W 16-116-22-33-0010 20 - (2,191.56) TS&W 17-116-22-11-0001 20 - (4,840.00) TS&W 17-116-22-14-0001 20 - (1,425.00) TS&W 17-116-22-14-0002 20 - (2,251.50) TS&W 17-116-22-14-0004 20 - (3,135.00) TS&W 22-116-22-12-0004 20 - (2,381.00) TS&W 25-116-22-33-0001 20 - (74,092.80) TS&W 26-116-22-22-0003 20 - (7,125.00) TS&W 26-116-22-23-0003 20 - (48,707.80) TS&W 27-116-22-13-0015 20 - (1,966.50) TS&W 27-116-22-14-0021 20 - (1,852.50) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0002 20 520.00 - TS&W 35-116-22-13-0003 20 520.00 - TS&W 35-116-22-13-0005 20 520.00 - TS&W 35-116-22-13-0007 20 - (1,360.00) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0008 20 - (1,360.00) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0009 20 - (1,360.00) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0010 20 - (1,360.00) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0011 20 - (1,360.00) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0014 20 - (1,360.00) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0015 20 - (1,360.00) I TS&W 35-116-22-13-0016 20 520.00 - TS&W 35-116-22-13-0017 20 1,360.00 - TS&W 35-116-22-13-0031 20 1,360.00 - TS&W 35-116-22-13-0034 20 (511.68) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0035 20 - (511.68) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0036 20 - (511.68) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0037 20 - (511.68) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0038 20 - (511.68) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0043 20 - (511.68) TS&W 35-116-22 13-0044 20 - (511.68) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0045 20 - (511.68) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0046 20 - (511.68) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0047 20 - (511.68) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0048 20 - (511.68) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0049 20 - (511.68) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0050 20 - (511.68) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0051 20 - (511.68) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0052 20 - (511.68) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0053 20 - (511.80) TS&W 35-116-22-13-0001 20 520.00 - TS&W 35-116-22-24-0011 20 9,630.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-11-0001 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-11-0002 20 - (520.00) TS&W 36-116-22-11-0003 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-11-0006 20 - (23,120.00) TS&W 36-116-22-11-0007 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-12-0002 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-12-0003 20 - (1,523.00) TS&W 36-116-22-13-0001 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-13-0002 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-13-0003 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-13-0004 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-13-0010 20 - (1,469.00) TS&W 36-116-22-13-0011 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-13-0012 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-13-0013 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-13-0014 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-13-0015 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-13-0016 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-13-0017 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-13-0018 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-13-0019 20 - (598.00) TS&W 36-116-22-14-0001 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-14-0002 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-14-0004 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-14-0005 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-14-0006 20 520.00 - TS&W 36-116-22-22-0002 20 - (2,421.00) TS&W 36-116-22-22-0007 20 - (24,795.00) TS&W 35-116-22-24-0011 20 - (9,630.00) TS&W HENNEPIN CTY PARCEL 20 - (3,948.00) SUBTRUNK SEWER AND WATER i F SU,S&W 02-116-22-13-0004 11 15 - (4,354.79) SU,S&W 02-116-22-41-0002 11 15 - (5,545.55) TREE REMOVAL TREE 08-116-22-11-0053 1 - (728.00) TREE 04-116-22-22-0073 1 - (85.00) TREE 04-116-22-22-0007 1 - (120.00) TREE 05-116-22-44-0028 1 - (400.00) TREE 05-116-22-44-0023 1 - (500.00) TREE 05-116-22-41-0048 1 - (450.00) TREE 09-116-22-22-0002 1 - (70.00) TREE 25-116-22-41-0065 1 - (150.00) TREE 12-116-22-23-0001 1 - (135.00) TREE 17-116-22-41-0001 1 - (275.00) TREE 05-116-22-42-0046 1 - (700.00) 1 WEED REMOVAL WEED 05-116-22-42-0001 8 1 - (93.75) WEED 05-116-22-31-0022 8 1 - (50.00) WEED 05-116-22-31-0026 8 1 - (37.50) WEED 24-116-22-34-0009 8 1 - (31.25) WEED 25-116-22-14-0059 8 1 - (56.25) 1 CONNECTION FEE CONN 16-116-22-41-0001 8 20 - (7,400.00) CONN 26-116-22-41-0039 8 20 - (7,400.00) REASSESSMENT OF CHATHAM WOODS CHATH 05-116-22-21-0016 12 10 - (10,815.29) CHATH 05-116-22-21-0017 12 10 - (12,615.29) CHATH 05-116-22-21-0021 12 10 - (13,515.29) CHATH 05-116-22-21-0022 12 10 - (12,615.29) CHATH 05-116-22-21-0026 12 10 - (11,715.29) CHATH 05-116-22-21-0027 12 10 - (10,215.29) CHATH 05-116-22-21-0028 12 10 - (10,848.64) CHATH 05-116-22-21-0029 12 10 - (12,023.34) CHATH 05-116-22-21-0032 12 10 - (9,015.29) CHATH 05-116-22-21-0040 12 10 - (9,915.29) S R.M.FEERICK ASSOCIATES 7103 Interlachen Court j Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 ( September 15, 1987 The Honorable Gary D.Peterson City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Mr.Carl Jullie, City Manager City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mayor Peterson and Mr.Jullie: This letter is submitted on behalf of Feeders, Inc. and R.M. Feerick Associates, the fee owner and Contract for Deed purchaser, respectively, of real estate located adjacent to Technology Drive in the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota and subject to assessments for project IC 52-010D. The City reviewed the proposed assessments at a hearing held on Tuesday,September 8,1987 at the City Hall. This is to request that the proposed assessments on the north side of Technology Drive be deferred until the property is sold to the State Highway Department or released for development. It is our understanding that interest will accrue during the deferment period. The completion of Technology Drive represents a very positive action for the site and for the major center area. The property owner made a substantial contribution to Technology Drive by providing a large amount of fill and surcharge to the public improvement. Objections to the assessment are withdrawn by the fee owner and contract for deed purchaser in consideration of the assessment deferment on the north side of Technology Drive. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Very truly yours, R. M.Feerick As Richard Feerick RMF/vs • cc: Maclay R.Hyde ( Bassford,Heckt,Lockhart do Mullin,P.A. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST October 20, 1987 CDNTRACTDR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) CIGARETTE Adolfson & Peterson, Inc. Eden Ridge Shoppe Herfert Enterprises Garden Court Gifts B. A. Prescher Company Vac Shack TYPE B FOOD Eden Ridge Shoppe ( HEATING & VENTILATING Garden Court Gifts Doc's Heating GAS FITTER Doc's Heating These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. 761141.f-4. Pat Solie, Licensing MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: October 14, 1987 SUBJECT: Request to Approve Bid for Partial Repair of the Community Center At the September 15th Council meeting, the City Council authorized staff to receive bids for partial repair of the Community Center. The estimated cost for the first phase repair was $340,00D for brick and $325,000 for a concrete block exterior. On Tuesday, October 13, 19B7, the City received two bids for partial repair to the Community Center. Morcon Construction, Inc. submitted a base bid of $247,385 for a repair using concrete block and a $30,650 add using a brick exterior. Morcon also bid $4.10 per square foot for repair of the roof. C. F. Haglin & Sons submitted as base bid of $246,000, plus $30,0D0 for 66 alternate 1, which included a brick exterior and $3.60 per square foot for the roof repair. a a Staff requests that the Council accept the low bid of C. F. Haglin & Sons for a base bid of $246,000 and the alternate 1 of $30,000 additional for a brick exterior finish on this project, plus a unit price per square foot of $3.60 for repair of the natatorium roof to the extent that such repair is required and inspected and reviewed by the City architect. BL:md MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: October 8, 1987 SUBJECT: Request from Ray Stodola Attached is a September 1, 1987 letter from Mr. Ray Stodola outlining his proposal to sell a strip of land adjacent to Eden Valley Park to the City of Eden Prairie. Also attached is a September 3, 1987 memorandum from Bob Lambert that gives the background for this request and a copy of the minutes of the September 21st Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission meeting. At the September 16th meeting staff discovered that the southern most property owner, Mrs. Beckman, was not interested in acquiring any of the park property; however, the six property owners to the north were interested in acquiring the property at a "reasonable price". At this point the City has several options: 1. Do nothing until the land goes tax delinquent due to the assessments that have been placed on the parcel for the removal of diseased elm trees. (If the City acquired this parcel through tax forfeiture process it cannot be resold, but must be used for park purposes.) 2. Acquire the property from Mr. Stodola and move the park boundary to the west. If the City took this action, the City would clean up the strip of land requiring all private property owners to remove play equipment, gardens, buildings, etc. and would begin to maintain that area as parkland. The City could plant screening material in this area to provide some of the privacy that property owners indicate they seek. 3. The City could acquire this parcel from Mr. Stodola and subdivide the parcels and sell them back to the property owners. This only makes sense if all six property owners north of Mrs. Beckman agree to pay their fair share of the cost. City staff have discussed the pros and cons of each of these options such as: A. The City park does not need the extra 30' along the western boundary, except for the purpose of trail access to the northeast. B. The existing condition of the land is a public nuisance and it would be a benefit to the community for the City to acquire the land and either maintain it as park or sell ft to the property owners for them to maintain. C. It only makes sense to sell it to the property owners if all six property owners north of Mrs. Beckman agree to pay their fair share of the costs rather than having a jigsaw west property line to the park. •�` 4 / 1 a 1 i City staff recommend the City Council authorize acquiring the property from Mr. Stodola, and for the City to clean up the property and begin maintaining it for the City'skcost, the�City staff wouldithenorecommendeallowinggdivisionaoffthis strip of land through the administrative division process and selling it to the property owners. This would only occur if the City received all of the k money up front. The costs include the following: 1. Estimated tree removal assessments $1,500. 2. Estimated attorney's fees for title opinion, preparing and filing deeds $1,500 to $2,000. 3. Surveying costs, if the City allowed their administrative split, $2,000. 4. The City costs for removal of stumps, rocks, minor grading and seeding, estimated at about $1,000. The City would maintain a drainage and utility easement over this property and would maintain a 40' wide trail easement over the northern end of this strip for future trail access to the northwest. BL:cn MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services -AL- DATE: September 3, 1987 SUBJECT: Request From Ray Stodola Regarding Land Adjacent to Eden Valley Park Attached is a September 1, 1987 letter from Ray Stodola that outlines the proposal he has for selling a strip of land approximately 30' wide by BOO' long that is adjacent to the western boundary of Eden Valley Park. A copy of the half section map is attached. Mr. Stodola points out that apparently the surveyors for Country Vista surveyed from the west to the east a normal distance for a quarter section, but did not actually carry it all the way to Mr. Stodola's eastern property line; thus leaving an unclaimed parcel. The underlying property owner of this parcel is the original owner - Mr. Ray Stodola. The County records show no owner of this parcel, and Mr. Stodola is unwilling to spend money for an attorney to make the County correct the records. The City has listed Mr. Stodola as the owner of record for purposes of notifying for special assessemnts for diseased tree removal. As Mr. Stodola has pointed out, several of the property owners of lots to the west of this strip of land have used the strip of land for their own convenience, placing boats, storage buildings, gardens, etc. on this parcel. Others simply use the parcel for a place to dump grass clippings, rocks, old lumber, etc. The parcel is well maintained by property owners in some areas and is an eyesore in other areas. Mr. Stodola removed the diseased elm trees after receiving notice two years ago; however, last year he was unable to get into the property to remove the diseased trees due to the use of the property by other individuals. Mr. Stodola has also indicated that he does not intend to remove trees marked again this year for the same reason, and has suggested that he sell the property to the City of Eden Prairie for $1,200 after removal of assessments. Mr. Stodola does not believe he would be able to get all seven property owners to agree to extend their property lines through the parcel and pay him for the parcel and for the attorney's fees that would be necessary to make seven separate subdivisions of that parcel. Mr. Stodola has suggested that the easiest way to correct this "surveyor's" mistake is for him to sell the property to the City to extend the park boundary approximately 30' to the west. The Community Services Staff wish to point out the following considerations for the Commission and Council members: 1. If the City is to extend a trail access to the northwest of the park to serve residents as proposed, the City will need to acquire, either through easement or title, access across the northern portion of land. this strip of 2. Approximately the eastern half of this strip of land is not maintained by anyone and is an eyesore, especially from Duck Lake Trail and from the park. 3. Several of the property owners will feel very strongly about extending their backyards through this property rather than having the park expand in their direction. 4. If Mr. Stodola fails to pay the special assessments on this parcel, it would go tax forfeit in two years at which time the City could acquire the parcel at no cost other than assuming the cost of the special assessments; however, there is always the possibility that Mr. Stodola might change his mind and pay the assessment in order to sell parcels to adjacent property owners. Mr. Stodola has the option at this point to obtain an attorney and clear the title to the property and attempt to sell parcels to various property owners (and a trail easement to the City), or he may let the parcel go tax forfeit, ( at which time the City could acquire the parcel. Mr. Stodola has offered to give the City a quit claim deed for this parcel for an amount of $1,200, plus the assessements for tree removal that have already been placed against the property. The Community Services Staff would recommend acquiring this parcel for two reasons: 1. For the trail easement that will be necessary to the northwest. 2. In order to be able to maintain what is now an eyesore along much of the park's west boundary. All seven property owners that abut this property to the west will be notified that this item will be reviewed by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission at their September 21st meeting, and by the City Council at their October 6th meeting. BL:md , s24.-4" /9'ir-7 i., ,, e'er,`' r _ � N _ _zzi, ,71.‘,Z,Z.. - ., .4-.4— I-4t_..,,, ,,)- _ � am I-72�/ Cl---- -�E�...-/.ems z4, <✓ t�� 4(,, /71 7 • _94_(,„ • / ' .6.....,ii/ , -:,.& , - ., :;:7147/7L_7 - ---v .E.a..,.t .v cam,✓ ---w- o-r--,..0-4,-)+._e- 6 ,,,ze.,,...:4 :.�lj ,1/a, f.-,� /saw,-,' Z:',za^,_.,,e_ �, .,/9..; L ( _L /U/ ,,I,..):,_,,' —�l+ ,,,. / 7.,e/ . .,,;,,,n vc.-,---- 4.--z--,1-411"-"/ el•-•,67...-1-4--,,e-a-a-.1 : -� ca— " Q,/ �,�..y-�.� ..3 -e- . /77_�, �, ,,,.„7-4,i, ,,,„... ...a-e-,--- - zr--„,e, . ....„/„.„_4.2.4„/„..4, ., ,,,a, : ---:_a:T, 42-/,-2-2,-,7--,k L---.-,-4 /,.... ,,...... -":„.„4 i / - `/ sue l ,L, ,L._ ,64-z.- � ---.i-(�'-._ / — .i L i ,1-,✓" -14-3 -t,--,., d-2. ie, Tom,. �,-ez� ( -1-e--C 44.-&-sc—es-- •- ele--/17.Z 1-'c'",---4------1-,c-z-e-7‘ l--,-- , '19 a',. ) ' • ,r 0-%—.C., e, 1-e--c_zr-r , ten..-Z-.4-coe,.. ` _ :14_41, 714 4.- _, I 0: 24_,__.e...,s,...ei,,-7,--4- 4.-c..,a4.„. 74._ i ,--171.:/L„,,:t (3� .cA..�.z cv ?• -s:7- .(5ire-c /h o•fi-ce. ...,....Z:4-ti4e_e__,/V-0...7/2-17-3r7-,,,/ L-C, 7e4,4 C® __. oe--- - ''Cle....7^t,./0„_.frt.q.-.6./. e-er-Z4-,1 C{2 C--.1"-",-7%.,_..-e4 _ _„,...„,....„..7„...7 ,--7r;vg,te,c,06-e--,/, /27,7/. ej.:4 ....9,.../4.,,,:e„,4 7- 6 c_erhzi...- , . .9.--,4-.--(-6prii-,,,,,L.e. . - i--e., U`,-a i9a-Y �7, d _AT �� . tJ Z oa,.e�a G si- r--,-eCZ-d-- m , Qe- ai .-Z.--., , A_, \ L_ r--.---7c Li- Z" ,,,--- !.) ' 1 • , • :? it ( v . ? i . . • • • VOR RD. ttii . . 1 ,. ii ,#,.•?: 11••-4,... ' • ' 4 i - • Yor:477-751. 1- & .40.4 ,,,,. 11.711, 1e4• $7• 171 1717 65' F .3•• .--.- • k. '0,•i)la`V/44•1: .11•111) Co utlyst „0. 114;o 4 4(5)...ii-1/2 ?\`a it 8 -p ,'i.:' ,-.,tat,„- — (45) 1, ,.. -' irli ,. , (10),,:0 5 0 (12) 41 r,--:7),V;Viirfa.,,,...._ 4. ;* __....,s;,......,•,,,,,, ,,,i."Ix _ (9 7. ,, .3 •A• -', P.,i•Y-'-'4,'..„r7.1";•; -„;-.-.i.• 147.55. :11 45/ iiii ,,„ 1..51...• , .51" (.5. . 'ipii Wilo ' 1:.' (6) • a.m.. ...qii l....•J....44 4,- 'Il... 1.'. ..•-• i.-1...:.' ,, . .. " ". 167 tit IVII•tki/ P1.6.., i-kIP3) ,%'.' 1 ...) ,.....t**?' J 11 .5. ....(31),.,,i;i •.\\:14,S ./v ;••:5 (48) .'5. 4'•• •••• qi ',, 21 I (7) - •'• .b,...0' *. 4 ' (30) `b• ., . / ,,, „u ,75* M. 10 ' : 41.4." 410 lit 2, 'c'S,16•1°. • WO'‘cr33.•( 0_..• 4 ..,-.. " -4\‘,1-( a) i fl A", :4--- ••Nov HoNElso" • '' t'. (i'' - •-10• ,y•ii as,..--.1.,, . P.,:::•• . . ' fr - (;3 *."1.4. '• tie't •i; 'k 14`0\ - i Wit) (:;) Y` • t's it's lit 'a r.3' ....• tEn , s \ ,,•t'igic32)it (31) v • g,:- : .,.: .; 1c4.‘,41'!' 14 .f, t i • , , ,, . ,. , ,. il lo 2, 11 "Ji• .:t i•‘g_1('((m7?743•))i.Vl f t. i1.--E—8.•g g.o1/4.'0n T v'75I—I —r-k"4nLsf1°i.5ev f.s',.,b.V''A.4L 0('.3..1'11,,.1.;)"m1--vr..j1'..:.;1.•.•V••S.,<Y-*•'b.4A.. - x4n) t ,4, ;•." t l• Ro) ;2 44 '?. C .,. W t..-1.0 1-. .1 A 1,... i. (23) . 4, Si ".. T.-:. 4.• . . .? . 7 21 . tor.8.31.1 , . :., P;.. ;35V :1.435)1;11 •:: • : - A.(37) 4' ; Eg (75)11'' i it 16811.1 Ph.- n. ,.0 0.2"(T9)' 7.,•-1 ..,-,. •.. \ . ,..,_, -.2A.„,••..---. vt____43-• - I or' 1'5). ' t • lii0-- ''' ',14°.•,' • z.,No-c-') gi.It s. n .to%b?'•••••••11,,;',4„-1Tr a -\,1 u t/1 11 ...g. -4 •• _ %• , (27),,...,. • .. •,?.) .0.,,i,. ,, s,z. (36) 9, ‘'''''+'`.4-1 -./-;.,t:L.-.----tikit.-1 .. r '. .., . ...: ,.. • A R13)"t,. •,,,, (76), .1 , ,2,,, -....g:f.,, . If t 70"c,?6)i 011 !''' „12,0„,-.---•'-".-.'" ... s,.3°.• ' ,...- i) : ...„(6) , I k •4%•.:' l'i IV .0°' ) .4•••• 1 4.40•10.L 47/ c...44 t.1„,(tY, .! i • . t?) . Co. '',co i te•b\4 ? 5,( c.vc--.----- . i -- 4.v Pl- V ej. 1,,6 ii...\_,;(••••• , • , 1 s..•1 ,c• s - - , is'. 's • 0,-‘ - - - .•I a. ' 6,0 1.. L. - ' ' '.--i--- --.-:_ • . . ,. 1 , ' _ .- r In . . ....-___ i---.- ; •.<C'‘et I. I • r ' , 1.(,'il1; l•,k; y 4.- • ';1.4-• °,.., 4;,tstr i ;iv.,A0, •,...1 i ( 1 ' .: r. -t,\Q-- i, I:-: A(‘' ,L ' i., • 4y%,i • ''' Di jlt K ,,,I l.`.110 1 ‘11:1 l'k n• r 0.1y./26 - ' .".....3 1.-.."3.4., .'-' I l'.• 1 °a.I (1 I I T 5 5"si 1.11(6; ii;4 ; ,,:.,ci" ......,•.,.. 1 5 5S',. Ns'.•'...r f 121, 1, (10) (9)'' - t ,i 1 . ..tt .t, . ' It' • .4! ..: 0 i .' ”t!'... !" *--. —. .••, -°,7 14.:87. .Aryl . - ---.-_......... _ 2/.:.L1......4 Ja.m...2...:,...-.5'6... i : i• 1, w.,, 4' . 'i: ; '4..1 ',1t.1 ‘... .1 iSC:75)1/•• ,f .. • ,; ,) •- - • , -':•IV".14 39+tfi' • n ,),,,,%'. *;•,......,-.- ‘-'si.. • ,,,;''.- , (.....; u -„,:t?, ., -,:,_._, :.t? ,..... ,2,.. 1741,,„, '.•113.1.- ••(.51 4.,"i'''••:',' NDTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Notice is hereby given that the City Council will meet at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, September 8, 1987 in the City Hall, 7600 Executive Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, for the purpose of holding a Public Hearing to consider the proposed assessments for the following improvements in Hennepin County, Minnesota, Township 116, Range 22: Tree Removal The proposed assessment roll is now on file in the office of the Deputy City Clerk and is open to inspection by all persons interested. All persons who wish to be heard with reference to the assessment roll should be present at - the hearing to present either written or oral objections. Written or oral objections will be considered by the Council prior to the adoption of the assessment roll. CAUTION: No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any assessment adopted unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. An owner may appeal an assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice. with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. For your further information, please note the following: 435.193 through 435.195 of Minnesota Statutes provides that a city may, at its discretion, defer any payment of special assessments for homestead property of persons 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payment. Additionally, the City of Eden Prairie has determined that disabled persons may be entitled to deferments. Applications therefore may be obtained from the City of Eden Prairie by contacting the undersigned. A. The amount to be specially assessed against PID No.O5-06-aa.-yd-doc(G is S 7O0.0O B. the property owner may prepay the entire assessment and such payment should be made to the Ctty of Eden Prairie; C. Partial prepayment of the assessment has not been authorized by Ordinance; D. Prepayments made prior to November 15, 1987, may be made without the assessment of interest; and E. If the assessment is not prepaid within the required time period stated above, it will bear an interested rate of 8%. F. The assessment period is proposed to be 1 years. Sharon Sullivan Deputy City Clerk City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 937-2262 By order of the City Council, Sharon Sullivan, Deputy City Clerk UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Monday, September 21, 1987 7:30 p.m., 7600 Executive Drive COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Pat Breitenstein, chairperson; Bud Baker (late), Moe Cook, Karon Joyer, Brian Mikkelson COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: Gary Gonyea, Charles Shaw COMMISSION STAFF: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services; Rick Bolinske, Superintendent of Recreation I. ROLL CALL The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by chairperson, Pat Breitenstein. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Lambert added Update on LAWCON Grant under VI. Reports of Commissioners, Boards & Staff, A. Reports of Director of Community Services. MOTION: Mikkelson moved to approve the agenda as amended. Cook seconded the motion and it passed 5-0. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - AUGUST 17, 1987 MOTION: Cook moved to approve the minutes as mailed. Joyer seconded the motion and it passed 5-0. IV. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Request from Ray Stodola Re: Eden Valley Park Refer to memo dated September 3, 1987 from Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services and letter dated September 1, 1987 from Ray Stodola. Lambert said that Mr. Stodola has suggested that the City buy this parcel of land from him, as there are several diseased trees on this property that must be removed and he does not believe he can get all seven property owners in this area to extend their property lines and pay him for the parcel along with attorney's fees to subdivide the land. Lambert said that a letter was sent to the seven property owners that abut Mr. Stodola's property to the west. The parcel of land is approximately 30' wide and was basically a surveyor's error. Area records show no one as the property owner; however, Mr. Stodola was the owner previously. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION -2- Lambert showed pictures of what the property line looks like and said that it is an eyesore in some areas since it has not been maintained. The property will go tax delinquent in two years. There were five of the seven property owners present at the meeting. Dan Campbell of 6725 Sunburst Dr. said that at the time he purchased his home three years ago, he knew about the surveyor's error on this parcel of land and since that time has used it as a kids play area and also planted some trees. He personally would like to acquire this land and added that he likes the park very much, but does not feel the City needs the additional land and cost to maintain it. If property owners were to purchase the land, it would make it taxable. John Price of 16680 Honeysuckle Lane said he sympathizes with Ray Stodola who thought he had sold the land some time ago. Price said that his home is located on the northern most portion and he wants to know about the plans for park access. He asked if the land becomes tax delinquent, does the City have a right to it over the property owners. Lambert said that when property goes tax forfeit, it.goes..to the state who turns it over to the County who in turn ask the City if it is needed for public open space purposes. If the City does not have a need, the property goes back to the County and is sold at public auction. Regarding park access, Lambert said it will be from existing trails and future access will be to the northwest of Eden Valley Park to a five acre parcel to the north. It will require a sidewalk system and access to the park. Breitenstein asked if Price would be interested in purchasing the property. Price said yes, Cook asked if the City would require an easement for the path to go through. Lambert said approximately 30' of easement would be required. Price asked who is responsible for adding berming, etc. along the property. Lambert said it would be the homeowner's responsibility. John Erdman of 6705 Sunburst Dr. said that he had someone in last year to remove trash on the lot to make it safer for the children. Erdman would be interested in obtaining the land for a reasonable price. Bob Grafton of 16689 Honeysuckle Lane said he would like to purchase the land also. He said he has tried to maintain the property. If the City were to receive the property, Grafton said there would not be more than 60! between his property and the park. He does not know what the options are, bit asked if the City needs the property. Lambert said the park works with or without the property. He added that on September 9 he received a call UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION -3- from June Beckman who also lives in this area. She said that she would not be interested in purchasing the property and thought the idea of the City owning and maintaining it was a good idea. Lambert said that he sees a number of options. If the City were to receive the property by quick claim title and could get the money they spend on special assessments, surveys and attorney's fees, they would probably consider selling it. Tom Johnson of 6685 Sunburst Dr. said that his major concern is being so close to the softball field that is used so frequently. He does not want to encourage bringing it closer to the homes. Johnson said that if the other home owners want to buy the property, he would go along with it but would like additional buffer from the park. Lambert said that if the property owners want to get together and figure out what they would like to do about this property, it could be brought before the City Council in two weeks. He will send a note to the residents with the approximate costs involved and allow them 30 days to make a decision. Johnson said that if the City would be interested and since they have the necessary equipment, perhaps they could level out the property and clean it up. Lambert said that this was a possibility and they would charge for the services. MOTION: Cook moved to recommend that the_City purchase the Stodola property and sell to the adjacent property owners, subject to an acceptable agreement. Mikkelson seconded the motion and it passed 5-0. V. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS None VI. REPORTS OF COMMISSIONERS, BOARDS AND STAFF A. Reports of Director of Community Services Refer to memo dated September 10, 1987 from Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services regarding Community Center partial repairs. Lambert said that this item was brought before the City Council on September 15. They authorized going out for bids on the first phase of repair. Lambert said it was made clear to the Council that after the first phase, the building will look rather strange until the second phase is completed. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 87-286 RESOLUTION APPROVING STATE BONDED FUND GRANT FOR ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT OF RILEY LAKE PARK EXPANSION UNDER THE PROVISION OF THE STATE BONDED FUND WHEREAS, the State Bond Fund provides for the making of grants to assist local governments in the acquisition and development of outdoor recreation projects; and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie desires to acquire and develop certain land known as Riley Lake Park, which land is to be held and used for permanent open space; and WHEREAS, in order for the proposed project to be eligible for approval, there must be proof that it is part of a comprehensive outdoor recreation and five year action program (capital improvement); and WHEREAS, it is estimated that the cost of acquiring and developing said interests shall be $49D,000; and WHEREAS, upon project approval, the City of Eden Prairie must enter into formal grant project agreements with the State for the specific purpose of acquiring and developing Riley Lake Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE City Council of the City of Eden Prairie: 1. That an application be made to the State of Minnesota, Department of Trade and Economic Development, Outdoor Recreation Grants Section, for a grant from the Bonded Minnesota Laws, Chapter 400, Section 8, subdivision 2(a) for an amount presently estimated at $490,000 and the applicant will pay the balance of the costs from other funds available to it. 2. That the Mayor and City Council and the City Manager are directed to execute and file: a) such application and the 5-year action program with the State of Minnesota, Department of Trade and Economic and Development, Outdoor Recreation Grants Section and to provide additional information and furnish such documents as may be required by said Department; and b) to act as the authorized correspondents of the applicant. 3. That the proposed acquisition and development is in accordance with the plans for allocation of land for open space uses and that should said grant be made, the applicant will acquire and develop and retain said land use designated in said application and approved by the Department of Trade and Economic Development. 4. That the United States of America and the State of Minnesota be and they hereby are, assured of full compliance by the applicant with the regulations of the Department of Interior, effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Rehabilitation act of 1973, Section 504; Age Discrimination Act of 1975; and Executive Order 11246, Equal Employment Opportunity. 5. That the City of Eden Prairie enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Trade and Economic Development, Outdoor Recreation Grants Section, to provide such grants as are specified in numbered paragraph 2, above, for the years 1988-1990. 1 6. That the Mayor of the City Council and the City Manager are authorized and directed to execute such agreement and supplemental agreements thereof. • ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 20th day of October, 1987. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, Clerk SEAL 6 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 87-289 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF CARDINAL HILLS WHEREAS, the plat of CARDINAL HILLS has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEO BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for CARDINAL HILLS is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated OCTOBER 14, 1987. B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving the six-month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said engineer's report. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on OCTOBER 20, 1987. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 1 ;, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE -ENGINEERING REPDRT DN FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Alan D. Gray, City Engineer FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician DATE: October 14, I987 v v SUBJECT: CARDINAL HILLS PROPOSAL: The Developer, New American Homes, has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Cardinal Hills, a single family residential subdivision located east of Baker Road, west of I-494 in the South half of Section Three. The plat contains 39.5 acres to be divided into 58 single family lots, 3 outlots, and road right-of-way dedication for street purposes. Outlots A, B and C contain 7.07, 3.13, and 0.62 acres respectively. Outlots A and B are flood plain areas of Nine Mile Creek and will be conveyed to the City by warranty deed. Outlot C will be retained by the Developer and will be combined with Outlot B of the adjoining Cardinal Ridge Subdivision for subsequent platting. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by City Council February 17, 1987, per Resolution No. 87-45. Second reading of Ordinance No. 6-87, changing zoning from rural to RI- 13.5, was read and adopted by the City Council April 21, 1987. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed June 10, 1987. VARIANCES: A variance from the requirements of City Code 12.20, Subd. 2.A, waiving the six-month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be necessary. All other variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. STREETS & UTILITIES: All municipal utilities, roadways, and walkways will be installed in conformance with City Standards and the requirements of the Developer's Agreement. A noise impact study was done regarding the noise impact of I-494. As detailed in the staff report of January 23, 1987, several lots exceed noise level limits. The Developer's Agreement requires the Developer to provide the City with a plan showing how the noise levels may be mitigated by the construction of a noise barrier; therefore, prior to release of the final plat, Developer must provide the City with plans for the noise barrier, and receive approval of said plans. Construction of the noise barrier is to be concurrent with utility and street construction. k Page 2 of 2 CARDINAL HILLS October 14, 1987 PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. BONDING: Bonding will conform to City Code and the Developer's Agreement. RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend approval of the final plat of Cardinal Hills subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement, and the following: 1. Receipt of street sign fee of $333.00. 2. Receipt of street lighting fee of $5,734.00. 3. Receipt of engineering fee of $2,280.00. 4. Receipt of warranty deeds for Outlots A & B. 5. Satisfacation of bonding requirements. 6. Receipt of noise barrier plans and City approval of same. JJ:ss cc: Frank Kramer, New American Homes Ron Krueger & Associates I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 87-290 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF SHADY OAK CROSSTOWN ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of SHADY OAK CROSSTOWN ADDITION has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for SHADY DAK CROSSTOWN ADDITION is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated OCTOBER 14, 1987. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on OCTOBER 20, 1987. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 1 T 1 // CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 4, ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Alan D. Gray, City Engineer \ /J FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician • a/A,y" DATE: October 14, 1987 SUBJECT: Shady Oak Crosstown Addition PROPOSAL: The Developer, AMOCO Oil Company, has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Shady Oak Crosstown Addition. Located south of Crosstown Highway #62 and east of Shady Oak Road, the plat contains 0.94 acres to be divided into one lot for use as an AMOCO Service Station. Formerly highway right-of-way for the Crosstown Highway #62, this land was purchased from Hennepin County. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council June 16, 1987, per resolution #87-170. Second reading of ordinance #31-87, changing zoning from rural to C-Highway District was finaly read and approved at the City Council meeting held July 21, 1987. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed July I4, 19B7. Resolution #87-169, amending the comprehensive guide plan from low density residential to community commercial was approved June 16, 1987. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: In order to serve this site with sanitary sewer and city water, these utilities must be extended along Shady Oak Road and into the site. All work involving municipal utilities will be done in accordance with City Standards and the requirements of the Developer's Agreement. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. 80NDING: Bonding will conform to City Code and the Developer's Agreement. ='a/LI Page 2 of 2 SHADY OAK CROSSTOWN ADDITION October 14, 1987 RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Shady Oak Crosstown Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement, and the following: 1. Receipt of street lighting fee of $614.00. 2. Receipt of engineering fee of $250.OD. 3. Revision of plat to include standard drainage and utility easements around perimeter of parcel , (10 feet in width along road frontage). 4. Satisfaction of bonding requirements for off-site utility construction. JJ:ss cc: Mr. C.L. Kristufek, Amoco Oil Company Mr. Man Czanstkowski, Amoco Oil Company North Star Engineering Bruce Grivna, Eagan, Field, Nowack • 1 CHANGE ORDER #1 I.C. 52-117 Watermain Extension from Baker Road to Rowland Road TO Machtemes Construction Changes made for work performed in this contract NATURE OF CHANGES: 1. Changed location of 12" wet tap, at request of person performing the tap and Pat McCarty, City of Eden Prairie Water Department. 2. Remove and haul approximately 50-75 large tree stumps buried on east side of Beech Road within the highway right-of-way. 3. Add an additional 15 L.F. of boring under Hwy. 494 to obtain proper clearance from shoulders. ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT COSTS: 1. Add the following quantities and costs to the contract: 4-hour crew time for locating main @ $275 $1,100.00 2. Add the following cost to the contract: Remove and haul tree stumps $1,100.00 3. Add the following quantities and costs to the contract: 15 L.F. of boring @ $120.00 per L.F. $1,800.00 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT ADJUSTMENTS Contract Amount Prior to this Change Order $ 162,543.50 NET INCREASE Resulting from this Change Order $ 4,000.00 Current Contract Amount Including this Change Order $ 166,543.50 THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE APPROVED Engineer City of Eden Prairie By �4"...'".... By Date //p7 Date THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTED Machtremee.s Construction By( • Date (?,/% /y�J e` , CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESTA RESOLUTION NO. 87-287 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A WATER MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FUND BY THE RILEY-PURGATORY-BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT AND FUNDING THEREFOR WHEREAS, the Minnesota State Statutes provide authority for Watershed Districts to establish a maintenance and repair fund ; and WHEREAS, the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District has adopted a resolution to raise $30,000 per year to establish the fund by Tax Levy. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie hereby approves and ratifies the establishment of a Water Maintenance and Repair Fund by the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District in accordance with and pursuant to the Laws of Minnesota, Chapter 501, 1980, in accordance with the authorization of the Board of Managers of said watershed district evidenced by resolution unanimously adopted by said Board of Managers on September 10, 1987, a copy of said resolution being attached hereto. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on October 20, 1987. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk ]p� 1 TAX LEVY RESOLUTION OF THE RILEY-PURGATORY-BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT FOR WATER MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FUND Manager Peterson offered the following resolution and moved its adoption, seconded by Manager Rahr: RESOLVED, that a mill rate levy sufficient to produce $30,000 be levied upon all taxable property in the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District, Hennepin and Carver Counties, State of Minnesota, for the year 1988, for the purpose of establishing and maintaining a Water Maintenance and Repair Fund for the District as provided by the laws of Minnesota, 1980, Chapter 501. The question was on the adoption of the resolution, and there were 4 ayes and one Manager absent, as follows: a Frederick W. Rahr X James L. Cardinal X Howard L. Peterson X Conrad B. Fiskness X Kay E. Alsaker Absent The Chairman declared the resolution unanimously adopted. ( Dated this 10th day of September, 1987. - Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District o �~� Engineering Advisor. Barr Engineering Co. 6800 France Ave. 2 Edina. MN 55435 55 A r �. Legal Advisor, Popham,Naik.Schnobrich,Kaufman&Doty 4344 IDS Center Minneapolis,MN 55402 333-4800 September 28, 1987 Dear Municipal Officials: At its recent budget hearings, the Board of Managers of the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District authorized establishment of a Water Maintenance and Repair Fund in accordance with special legislation adopted in 1980 by the Minnesota legislature. Previously, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has authorized the establishment of a fund for that District which was approved by all affected municipalities. This District now believes that given various problems which have occurred within the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District over the past several years, the time has now come to fund this program for this District. This will result in having available nearly $30,000 to undertake water maintenance and repair projects for water resources located throughout the District. In order to properly fund this program, approval from local municipalities are required in accordance with the special legislation adopted in 1980. On behalf of the District, we request your City Council to give its approval to this program. • Assuming all seven municipalities within the District approve the undertaking of this program, we would then appreciate receiving a request from you for projects you wish the District to consider. We have already received initial inquiries from the City of Eden Prairie to undertake various water maintenance programs. We would request the same from all municipalities in order that the Managers can properly evaluate all requested municipal proposals from the beginning of this program. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Any questions you might. have regarding the need to adopt resolutions from your City Council to authorize the funding of this project should be directed to our attorney, Frederick S. Richards at 3300 Piper Jaffray Tower, 222 South Ninth Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612) 334-2519. Very truly yours, RILEY-PURGATORY-BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DiIST CT Byi#rv`1GLgI'//!�� vrvyJ Conrad B. Fiskness Its President FSR:sam:5987n cc: Board of Managers Robert Obermeyer Frederick S. Richards, Esq. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 87-288 RESOLUTION REQUESTING COST SHARING FOR INVESTIGATIONS AND MAINTENANCE IN THE WATERSHED OF RILEY CREEK WHEREAS, the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District has taken steps necessary to develop a maintenance and repair fund; WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has approved a resolution supporting said maintenance and repair fund; WHEREAS, the heavy rain storms during July resulted in significant damage to private and public property; and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie desires to make necessary repairs and to investigate the drainage system to determine the extent of additional repairs and maintenance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that the Riley- Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District is respectfully requested to partici- pate in maintenance projects and investigations of flooding problems as follows: A. Investigation of storage capacity, flow conditions and outlet conditions for the segment of Riley Creek generally within the confines of the Edenvale Golf Course; B. Investigation of storage capacitiy, flow characteristics and outlet capacity of the Eden Lake/Neil Lake storm sewer system; C. Investigate the storage capacity, flow characteristics and outlet capacity of the ponding area known as Valley Ponds which lies south of Valley View Road and westerly of the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad; D. Investigate the storage capacity, flow characteristics and outlet capacity of the ponding and drainage system lying easterly of Franlo Road and north of CSAH I in the vicinity of Nottingham and Buckingham Drives; E. Removal of silt deposits from a sedimentation pond located on the Edenvale Golf Course west of Mitchell Road and south of Valley View Road; and F. Dredging of Riley Creek from Research Road north to approximately Anderson Lakes Parkway. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on October 20, 19B7. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk - MEMORANDUM - TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Alan D. Gray, City Engineer FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician% • \ { DATE: October 15, 1987 v SUBJECT: Grading Permit for Reconstruction of Two (2) Holes of Olympic Hills Golf Course Mr. Wayne Brown, on behalf of Olympic Hills Golf Club, has requested City Council approval of a grading permit to allow the reconstruction of golf holes number 5 and 16. This request comes in the wake of the July 23rd and previous flooding events. The intent is to elevate these holes by regrading, while at the same time creating an increase in storm water storage area as required, since this land lies within flood plain areas. The Purgatory Creek Water Shed District and the Department of Natural Resources will require permits for this request. Therefore, would recommend approval of this grading permit request subject to permit approvals of these two agencies. JJ:ss - MEMORANDUM - TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Alan D. Gray, City Engineer FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician}\ DATE: October 15, 19B7 �J1v SUBJECT: Grading Permit on Nelson Property Mr. David Nelson has requested City Countil approval of a grading permit on his property on Bennett Place south of County Road 1. The request is to allow grading of the southern portion of his property to construct a house pad for future development. Because of the construction of Bennett Place, this request comes at an opportune time, in that it allows a flattened boulevard slope along Bennett Place, and it allows Mr. Nelson to scraper haul the soil off-site, versus the more expensive alternative of truck hauling, as would be necessary once street construction is complete on Bennett Place. Recommend approval of this grading permit subject to restoration of all disturbed areas. JJ:ss CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #87-282 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RAVEN RIDGE II FOR THE CAM BRIDGE GROUP BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Raven Ridge II for The Cambridge Group, dated October 13, 1987, consisting of 3.04 acres into 16 lots and 2 outlots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 20th day of October, 1987. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 1 STAFF REPORT (, TO: Planning Comnission FROM: Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: September 25, 1987 PROJECT: Raven Wood LDCATION: East of Edenvale Boulevard, southwest of Raven Court APPLICANT: The Cambridge Group FEE OWNER: Raven Ridge Corporation REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Amendment within the RM-6.5 zoning district on 3.04 acres. 2. Preliminary Plat of 3.04 acres into 16 lots and 2 outlots. �/ olik .` a_T,C� r' Background �""i �r� S� s E 'et This site is currently designated on 'y •-'�'�• V '� in �w ( the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide i♦ , ,, .�`,.,o.: _0,. Plan for development as Medium it Density Residential and zoned RM- �.�,� �, ��� 6.5. Adjacent properties are guided , ` r * ���� d C �' ? for Low Density Residential. Spe- rR . cific land uses in this area include -� 'j r1Q a the Hipps Cedar Point 1st Addition, ' ( I �/ A *•. 111•— zoned RM-6.5 to the north; Raven + t, Ridge, zoned R1-13.5 to the east; ) (1 4.7..� j�a(� ... Tamarac Woods, zoned R1-13.5 to the PROPOSED SITE' west; and, the Edenvale 5th Veit). Addition, zoned RM-6.5 to the south. FP ,; • .-..,. This project is part of the Raven inga, IPP^" , `;�.V.OP IIIV, Ridge subdivision reviewed ands" , approved on May 16, 1978, which 'm ���•�� �� •M 2.5 included 22 single family lots and .� �W� .�'j`" 24 townhome units on approximately ir .. 44, �� � t �t� �W 13.73 acres. Presently, the 22 "' "` ' single family homes to the northeast /-PUB i's'\ rr and 8 of the townhouse units have been built. The current proposal is , ,i for the remaining 16 townhome units \k to be built on the site which consists of approximately 3.04 • acres. ♦# F P... 1c. t AREA LOCATION MAP i. ,1 Raven Wood 2 September 25, 1987 Site Plan/Preliminary Plat The current proposal is for a total of 16 units within five building clusters including three, 4-unit buildings, and two, 2-unit buildings. All of the buildings meet the minimum requirements of the RM-6.5 zoning district. Based upon a total of 16 townhome units, a total of 32 parking stalls are required which includes one enclosed. The units have been designed with two-car garages plus driveway parking. A minimum of 25 feet shall be provided behind the garages to the curb line on the private street to allow for driveway parking. In addition, the proponent is proposing a total of seven additional parking stalls in order to accommodate overflow parking. Access to this site is provided from Edenvale Boulevard with a private road extension looping through the site and connecting to the existing Raven Ridge townhome development. A cross-access agreement is proposed to allow for smooth traffic flow between the projects. Due to the location of the access on Edenvaie Boulevard, there are sight distance limitations. The proponent has submitted a site line which indicates that a number of trees and brush within this area will have to be removed and maintained in order to provide a minimum 325-foot sight distance. Grading The natural grade on the site slopes in a westerly direction from a high point of 894 along the eastern property line to the 85B contour elevation along Edenvale Boulevard. The majority of the grading occurs along the eastern property boundary in order to construct the tuck-under units adjacent the steep slope. There are a number of trees on this wooded slope which the proponent has indicated will be saved. Snow fencing shall be installed around these trees in order to insure their protection. Utilities Water and sanitary sewer service are available to this site to connections made to a six-inch water line and an eight-inch sanitary sewer line located to the northwest of this site within Edenvale Boulevard. Storm water run-off has been designed to sheet drain across the lot to an existing drainage swale adjacent Edenvaie Boulevard. Run-off calculations shall be submitted for Engineering review. Landscape Plan/Tree Inventory Based upon a building square footage of approximately 26,160 square feet, a total of 82 caliper inches of plant material is required. The submitted landscape plan depicts a total of 104.5 caliper inches located on-site. In addition, there are a total of 155 caliper inches of significant trees along the eastern property line, ail of which are being saved based upon the proposed grading and landscape plan. Architecture A variety of unit types have been designed for this site including walk-outs, ramblers, and tuck-unders, which were specifically designed to take advantage of the slope along the eastern property line. There are two, 2-unit, and three, 4-unit buildings proposed on this site. Unit sizes range from 1,425 square feet for a small two bedroom unit to 2,100 square feet per unit with the duplexes. The 4-unit buildings can be designed either with two or three bedroom units. The 2-unit Raven Wood 3 September 25, 1987 buildings measure approximately 52 feet wide and 50 feet deep and the 4-unit buildings measure approximately 110 feet wide and 50 feet deep. The existing units on the site are approximately 62 feet wide and 45 feet deep. Pedestrian Systems No additional pathways or sidewalks are required by the City of Eden Prairie. Signage and Lighting Details regarding any signage or lighting shall be submitted prior to building permit issuance. All signage shall meet the City Code requirements and any lighting standards shall be a maximum 20-foot downcast luminar. In the design of the lighting system, care shall be taken to eliminate any off-site glare. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff would recommend approval of the Raven Ridge project based upon plans dated September 22, 1987, and subject to the Staff Report dated September 25, 1987, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall revise the plans to reflect a 25- foot minimum front-yard setback to the garage from the curb of the private street. 2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. 8. Submit detailed storm water run-off, utility, and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. 3. Prior to Grading permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. Stake all grading limits with a snow fence. Any trees lost outside the limits shall be replaced on an area inch per area inch basis. B. Stake the construction limits with erosion control fencing. 4. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall submit building material samples and colors for review. 5. Concurrent with Final Plat, proponent shall go through an easement vacation procedure for the easements located on the previous plat. • Y Planning Commission Minutes -4- September 28, 1987 C. RAVIN RIDGE II, by The Cambridge Group. Request for Zoning District Amendment within the RM-6.5 District on 3.04 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 3.04 acres into 18 lots and 2 outlots • for construction of 18 townhouse units. A public hearing. Mr. Jerry Sholts, proponent, explained that this item is a re-development proposal. The original proposal consisted of 22 single family homes and 24 townhouses. There are 22 single family homes and 8 townhouse units which have been built. The current proposal is for the remaining 16 townhouse units to be built on the site which consists of approximately 3.04 acres. Planner Uram stated that this project is part of the original Raven Ridge project that was approved in 1978. The project as presented meets all of the requirements of the RM-6.5 zoning district. Although some small trees and brush will have to be removed as part of the development of this site, Staff is recommending approval of the plan as proposed, subject to the following conditions: 1. Units will retain a 25-foot front yard setback from curbline to garage along the private street. 2. Snow fencing will be provided around all of the wooded acres. 3. Proponent will submit building material samples and colors for review prior to building permit issuance. Chairman Schuck asked for comments from the Planning Commission. Ruebling asked if this project is 100% woodsiding, and what are the recommendations for brick. Uram said that brick is only required within the kh;-2.5 zoning district. Chairman Schuck asked for moments from the audience. Catherine (Kitty) McClintock, 6935 Edenvale Blvd., said she bought her townhouse five years ago and was told that the City had forbidden building in the area behind her townhouse. She expressed concern regarding the distance between the existing houses and the new oevelopment. Robert O'Neil, 6939 Edenvale Blvd., expressed the same concerns. He told of construction people coming in and bulldozing the area behind them, and then nothing was built. Planner Uram said that the Zoning Ordinance establishes certain requirements for setback within each zoning district. Once the plans are approved by the Planning Commission and City Council, the developer is required to build the project according to the approved plans. Planner Franzen added that the City has several controls to assure that projects are built as approved including a developer's agreement, building permit review and on site inspections. • Planning Commission Minutes -5- September 28, 1987 MOTION 1: Motion was made by Anderson, seconded by Ruebling, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5-0-0. MOTION 2: Motion was made by Anderson, seconded by Hallett, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of the Cambridge Group for Zoning District Amendment within the RM-6.5 District on 3.04 acres for 16 townhouse units for Raven Ridge II, based on plans dated September 22, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report of September 25, 1987. • Motion carried 5-0-0. MJTICN 3: Motion was made by Anderson, seconded by Fell, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of the Cambridge Group for Preliminary Plat of 3.04 acres for 16 lots for construction of 16 townhouse units and two outlots for Raven Ridge II, based on plans dated September 22, 1987, subject to the recommendation of the Staff • Report of September 25, 1987. Motion carried 5-0-0. .,,.7 J1 � CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ( _ i RESOLUTION NO. 87-284 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT TO THE OVERALL AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUO) of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the American Family Insurance development is considered a proper amendment to the overall American Family Insurance Planned Unit Development Concept; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the request of Opus Corporation for PUD Concept Amendment approval to the overall American Family Insurance Planned Unit Development Concept for the American Family Insurance development and recommended approval of the PUO Concept Amendment to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on October 20, 1987; NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The American Family insurance development PU0 Concept Amendment, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUO Concept Amendment approval to the overall American Family Insurance Planned Unit Development Concept as outlined in the application materials for American Family Insurance. 3. That the PUO Concept Amendment meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated September 25, 1987. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 20th day of October, 1987. Gary O. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John O. Frane, City Clerk l • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION 987-285 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE FOR OPUS CORPORATION BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of American Family Insurance for Opus Corporation, dated September 4, 1987, consisting of 14.36 acres into 1 lot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 20th day of October, 1987. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk OPUS CORPORATION DESIGNERS•BOWERS•DEVELOPERS October 9, 1987 Mr. Chris Enger, Director Department of City Planning City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2499 Dear Mr. Enger: On October 20, 1987 the City Council will be considering the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval of the PUD rezoning, preliminary plat and site development plan for the Phase 3 building of the American Family Insurance headquarters campus on the nineteen acre Eden Prairie portion of our Opus 2 Business Park. Opus Corporation requests that the issuance of a grading permit prior to final plat approval for the project be also added as an item of approval by the Council at that meeting. We are aware of the Council's past reluctance to grant permission to developers to begin grading before final plat approval of a project. However, we feel an exception should be made in this case for the following reasons: 1. All of the items needing to be settled and agreed upon between the City and the developer affecting grading and drainage have been satisfactorily resolved. (This is in part acknowledged and reflected in the Planning Commission's unanimous recommendation of approval to the Council.) 2. This is the expected third phase addition to the existing headquarters campus of American Family Insurance. Each of the previous phases have experienced little, if any, development problems to date. 3. Opus Corporation's reputation as a developer contractor in terms of consistently creating and delivering quality products in compliance with City development policy and/or planning standards is well known within Eden Prairie. 4. We expect an early winter in 1987 and an early start on the project will help control costs and assure timely occupancy of the proposed building. Both of these factors are of prime interest and concern to American Family Insurance, a valued Eden Prairie business. 5. Opus Corporation, as developer, will assume all risk in terms of restoration of any natural earthforms, trees and/or drainageways identified on the phase 3 site plan for preservation as the result of any unforseen damage or improper execution of site grading and/or excavation if its request for early grading is granted by the City. Al- OPUS AND AFFILIATES tN MINNFAPOIIS•CN$CA GO•PAOENrx•MILWAUKEF•TAMPA•PENSACOLA EXECUTIVE OFFICES 600 OPUS CENTER•9300 3REN(ICAO EAST•PO SO%1 SO•MiNNEAPOIS.MINNESOTA SSAAO 16121936-A4A4 is Mr. Chris Enger f October 9, 1987 \ Page -2- Please let me know if for some reason this item cannot be added to the Council's agenda for deliberation as part of the American Family Insurance project. Call me if you have questions or require any additional information. Thanks. Best regards, Robert A. Worthl±Tigton, AICP • Executive Director - Governmental Affairs RAW/km cc: Mike Franzen I I • • • U- OPUS CORPORATION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: September 25, 1987 PROJECT: American Family Insurance LOCATION: North of Crosstown Highway, south of Yellow Circle Drive APPLICANT: Opus Corporation FEE OWNER: American Family Insurance REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 14.36 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 14.36 acres with variances for building height and front yard setback. 3. Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 5.34 acres. 4. Preliminary Plat of 14.36 acres into one lot for the construction of a 5-story office building. Background '.4" "-` I,,,. 1 .4) A • _�e 1. This site is currently guided /\._ Office. The guide plan depicts \ _ surrounding land uses as Office and road right-of-way. This site is PROPOSED SITE currently zoned Rural. / This site is part of the 1978, C-REG-SE �/three-phase Planned Unit Development a �r! (PUD) for the American Family V ry Insurance Corporate Headquarters. Ii. �At this time, Phase I and II, 2.a., iut i ,, totalling approximately 110,000 ��.� '���� ' , square feet, have been built. \ F' Approval of the 1978 PUD was �4. predicated upon the third phase • r providing for a parking deck to '' • minimize the amount of on-grade parking and to save the majority of 14, : . 1111 the mature oak trees on-site. CIF / / ra eft I . , I. -- l AREA LOCATION MAP American Family Insurance 2 September 25, 1987 Site Plan The site plan depicts the construction of a five-story, 88,412 square foot office building at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.38. The FAR for all three buildings, totalling 199,958 square feet, is a 0.32. The office zoning district would permit up to a 0.5 FAR for multi-story buildings. The building meets the minimum setback requirements for the office zoning district. The parking meets the minimum setbacks from the Crosstown Highway; however, the parking structure is setback 20 feet from the north property line adjacent to Yellow Circle Drive. The ordinance requires a 35-foot setback for the deck. The proponent is requesting a variance under the PUD District Review. The request for variance may have merit since the use of the parking structure allows for more of the existing oak trees to be preserved than if all on-grade parking was provided on- site. Access to this site will be by driveway to Yellow Circle Drive and Blue Circle Drive in the Opus Office Industrial Park in Minnetonka. The developer should contact the City of Minnetonka for any required access permits to the roadway system. The amount of parking required would be based upon four spaces per 1,000 square feet or a total of 800 parking spaces for Phases I, II, and III. A total of 836 parking spaces are depicted on the site plan. Architecture The building will be constructed out of facebrick and glass with the color of the brick to match the existing brick color on Phases I and II. The parking deck is proposed to be constructed out of either concrete or brick. The deck should be constructed out of facebrick to match the building. Mechanical equipment is proposed to be located within the building and outside of the building on the south side. The ground mounted outdoor mechanical equipment will be screened by a brick wall. The proponents are requesting a height variance from 30 feet, allowed per Ordinance in the office district, up to 68 feet. The request for a variance may have merit considering the location of the proposed office building is within the Opus Office Park and the proximity to the Crosstown Highway. A variance was granted for a four- story building in Phase II in 1980 through the PUD District Review. The hills and large oak trees on-site also help mitigate the impacts of taller buildings than what is allowed by Code. Landscaping/Tree Replacement For a building of this size the Code would require the provision of 270 caliper inches. There are 270 caliper inches are depicted on the proposed landscape plan. Since this project is part of an overall PUD, tree reolacement was calculated across the entire 14.36-acre parcel. The total caliper inches contained on Phases I through III is 4,027 (primarily oak trees). The amount of trees removed would be 1,453, or 36%. The tree replacement policy would require a replacement of 60%, or 734 inches. The existing landscaping on Phases I and II plus proposed plantings for Phase III provide a total of 817 caliper inches. American Family Insurance 3 September 25, 1987 Traffic Although this site is not within the Major Center Area (MCA) traffic study, the proponent supplied traffic information to identify what potential impacts there may be on any roads or intersections. The traffic study indicates that the peak hour traffic generated by this project would be less than what was envisioned by the 1974 traffic study for the entire Opus project. No impacts are identified for roads in Eden Prairie or Minnetonka. The important issue related to traffic would be the access points onto the internal road system in the Opus project and the proponent should submit plans for any required access permits to the City of Minnetonka. Util ities Sewer and water service is available in Yellow Circle Drive in the City of Minnetonka. Storm water run-off is proposed to drain in a southerly direction through a catch basin system which drains into a ditch along the highway right-of- way. Lighting Lighting is proposed to be 30-foot high downcast cut-off liminars consistent with the lighting in Phase I and II. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Staff would recommend approval of the request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review and Planned Unit Development District Review, with variances for front yard setback and height, a Zoning District Change from Rural to Office, and the Preliminary Plat of 14.36 acres into one lot, based upon the Staff Report dated August 25, 1987, based on plans dated September 4, 1987, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water run-off, erosion control, and utility plans for review by the City Engineer. B. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. 2. Prior to Grading permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. B. Stake the proposed construction limits with a snow fence. Any trees that are lost outside of the snow fenced area shall be replaced on an area inch per area inch basis. 3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee. 8. Provide plans for review by the Fire Marshal. C. Provide samples of proposed exterior materials for review. Planning Commission Minutes -5- September 28, 1987 (. D. AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE, by Opus Corporation. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 14.36 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 14.36 acres with variances, Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 5.34 acres, Preliminary Plat of 14.36 acres into one lot for construction of a five-story office building. Location: North of CSAH #62, south of Yellow Circle Drive. A public hearing. Planner Franzen introduced Bob Worthington of Opus Corporation who said they had no disagreement with the Staff recommendations. Their intent is to begin construction in November. • Anderson asked how active American Family people are in alleviating the traffic problem in the County 18 road system. Duane Deliower, regional operations director for American Family Insurance, stated that a 494 Steering Committee has been formed and American Family Insurance is a member of the group. He said their employees have flexible hours and many come in at 7 a.m. and leave early. He further stated the company has positioned itself to minimize the traffic condition on the 494 corridor which would also include County Rd. 18. • Planning Commission Minutes -6- September 28, 1987 Fell referred to page 2 of the Staff Report, exterior material requirement for face brick on the parking deck. He asked if this shouldn't be included in Item 4 of the Staff recommendations? Franzen answered, this should be included as a recommendation of approval. Fell asked if American Family is aware of this and do they agree. American Family responded that the exposed faces of the walls will be brick except where they have to be protected from snow removal. Fell stated that this will be another parking ramp in the City of Eden Prairie and expressed concern of the long term problem of maintenance with parking ramps. He wondered what the City of Minneapolis has for parking ramp durability. Franzen stated that Staff has been in contact with several suburban communities. Staff will be talking to Minneapolis and will bring an update to the Planning Commission in the near future. Chairman Schuck asked for comments from the audience. There were none. MOTION 1: Notion was made by Hallett, seconded by Ruebling, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5-0-0. MOTION 2: Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Ruebling, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Opus Corporation for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 14.36 acres for American Family Insurance, for construction of a five-story office building, based on plans dated September 4, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 25, 1987. Notion carried 5-0-0. MCYr1CN 3: Notion was made by Hallett, seconded by Fell, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Opus Corporation for Planned Unit Development District Review on 14.36 acres, with variances, and Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 5.34 acres for American Family Insurance for construction of a five-story office building based on plans dated September 4, 1987, subject to the • • recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 25, 1987 with requirement for face brick on the exterior walls of the parking deck. Notion carried 5-0-0. x, . ; t Planning Commission Minutes -7- September 28, 1987 { Notion 4: Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Ruebling, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Opus Corporation for Preliminary Plat of 14.36 acres into one lot for American Family Insurance for construction of a five-story office building, based on plans dated September 4, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 25, 1987. Motion carried 5-0-0. V. OLD BUSINESS There will be general discussions at the next Planning Commission meeting to prepare for the joint meeting with the City Council. VI. NEW BUSINESS Uram showed the Planning Commission an Award of Merit presented by the Minnesota Society of Arboriculture that the City recently received. This will be presented to the City Council at the October 6th meeting. Commissioners Fell and Anderson discussed some of their concerns with regards to traffic and shared input from a meeting on I-494 Traffic Management and Road Improvements they recently attended. VII. PLANNERS REPORT Pone. VIII. AAJOURNMINr Chairman Schuck asked for a motion to adjourn. Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Fell, to adjourn the meeting at 9:10 p.m. A')I I VAC B7-09 (. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 87-291 VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ON LOTS 35, 38 & 39, BLOCK 1 WYNDHAM KNOLL WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain drainage and utility easements described as follows: All drainage and utility easements on Lots 35, 38 & 39, Block 1, Wyndham Knoll, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, delineated and dedicated on said plat of Wyndham Knoll WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on October 20, 1987 after due notice was published and posted as required by law; WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said easements are not necessary and have no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 1. Said drainage and utility easements as above described are hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of the pro- ceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.B51. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on October 20, 19B7. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 12 OCTOBER 20,1987 33931 VOID OUT CHECK 16.00- 37291 VOID OUT CHECK 38.87- '37326 VOID OUT CHECK 110.00- { tO8 VOID OUT CHECK 126.50- ,,434 VOID OUT CHECK 150.00- 37441 VOID OUT CHECK 20.00- 37777 VOID OUT CHECK 58.10- 37903 VOID OUT CHECK 79.50- 37951 PETTY CASH CHANGE FUND - ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 40.00 37952 VOID OUT CHECK 0.00 37953 MINNESOTA REC & PARK ASSOC REGISTRATION-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 88.00 37954 TTTC CONFERENCE - STREET MAINTENANCE 120.00 37955 PATRICIA IMMORMINO REFUND - SWIMMING LESSONS 17.00 37956 PATRICIA IMMORMINO REFUND - SWIMMING LESSONS 19.00 37957 DOUGLAS ROBERTSON REFUND - SWIMMING LESSONS 9.25 37958 STUART CAMPBELL REFUND - RACQUETBALL LEAGUE 5.00 37959 MARY SMITH REFUND - SKATING LESSONS 22.00 37960 MARCIA DROEGER REFUND - EXERCISE CLASS 25.00 37961 STAR TRIBUNE SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPARTMENT 70.20 37962 NSP SERVICE 9257.65 37964 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 65.96 37965 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE - UTILITY BILLING 325.78 37966 BELLBOY CORPORATION LIQUOR 1446.32 37967 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO WINE 71.40 37968 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 702.58 37969 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC BEER 2980.09 37970 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR WINE 7185.47 37971 PAUSTIS & SONS CO WINE 187.76 "47972 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO 37976 6012.29 73 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 1004.78 3#974 QUALITY WINE CO WINE 1745.07 37975 NSP SERVICE 12092.81 37976 MINNESOTA GAS CO SERVOCE 1488.21 37977 SOUTH HENNEPIN HSC CONFERENCE - HUMAN RESOURCES 8.00 37978 SUPPLIES 7 HI ENTER INC OCTOBER 87 RENT - LIQUOR STORE 4369.33 37979 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 10/2/87 43820.16 37980 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 10/2/87 11328.33 37981 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO• PAYROLL 10/2/87 4176.00 37982 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP PAYROLL 10/2/87 973.63 37983 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG PAYROLL 10/2/87 805.00 37984 PERA PAYROLL 10/2/87 21800.49 37985 UNITED WAY OF MPLS PAYROLL 10/2/87 158.88 37986 CITY-COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 10/2/87 684.13 37987 METHODIST HOSPITAL COPIES OF INJURY REPORT - POLICE DEPT 16.00 37988 HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD CONFERENCE - MAYOR 20.00 37989 MINNESOTA REC & PARK ASSOC REGISTRATIONS/FEES PAID 285.00 37990 VOID OUT CHECK 0.00 37991 DANA GIBBS PACKET DELIVERIES 156.00 37992 HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD CONFERENCE - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 20.00 37993 EMILY IVERSON REFUND - SWIMMING LESSONS 20.00 37994 LENNICE KEEFE REFUND - SWIMMING LESSONS 14.00 37995 SALLY KNAEBLE REFUND - SKATING LESSONS 16.00 i 37996 SANDY KRAEMER REFUND - SWIMMING LESSONS 1.75 ti 37997 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO RECORDER REPAIR - PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT 75.00 '"^98 GOPHER FOOTBALL SUPPLIES - ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 58.90 13318925 OCTOBER 20,1987 37999 BEER WHOLESALERS INC BEER 4578.90 38000 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 16.35 {38001 COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIX 854.50 ' t 702 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 5002.35 ,,J03 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER 13024.25 38004 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 443.64 38005 MARK VII SALES BEER 13396.31 38006 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO MIX 405.05 38007 ROYAL CROWN BEVERAGE CO MIX 92.45 38008 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 16036.10 38009 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE CO MIX 39.84 38010 PETTY CASH EXPENSES - CITY HALL 53.04 38011 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE - COMMUNITY CENTER 309.97 38012 MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE OCTOBER 87 LIFE INSURANCE 2065.68 38013 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN OCTOBER 87 HEALTH INSURANCE 16525.62 38014 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC OCTOBER 87 HEALTH INSURANCE 9243.50 38015 MURPHY'S LANDING ADULT OUTING - SENIOR CENTER 47.00 38016 IPMA - MINNESOTA CHAPTER CONFERENCE - HUMAN RESOURCES 12.00 38017 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS INC CONFERENCE - POLICE DEPARTMENT 196.00 38018 HENNEPIN cry CHIEFS OF POLICE CONFERENCE - POLICE DEPARTMENT 550.00 38019 JASON-NORTHCO PROPERTIES OCTOBER 87 RENT 38020 JAKE JORDAN SERVICE - COMMUNITY CENTER 5339.21 400.00 38021 GUARANTEE MUTUAL LIFE COMPANY OCTOBER 87 LIFE INSURANCE 3100.95 38022 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO INC -SERVICE - PRAIRIE VIEW DRIVE AND 2 431 84310.1 ST ANDREW DRIVE 2 38023 RICE LAKE CONTRACTING SERVICE - HOMEWARD HILLS ROAD 73086.29 38024 SHAFER CONTRACTING COMPANY INC SERVICE - COUNTY ROAD 4 TO MITCHELL ROAD 22961.40 38025 SHAW - LUNDQUIST ASSOC INC SERVICE - WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDITION 196863.75 1R026 NODLAND CONSTRUCTION CO SERVICE - HIDDEN GLEN THIRD ADDITION 141314.76 27 J P NOREX INC SERVICE - BLUFFS WEST STORM SEWER 4129.50 Ju028 MACHTEMES CONSTRUCTION -SERVICE - WATERMAIN BAKER ROAD TO ROWLAND 14317.02 ROAD 38029 RICHARD KNUTSON INC SERVICE - OLD SHADY OAK AND ROWLAND ROAD 100775.86 38030 KENKO INC SERVICE - BLUFFS EAST FOURTH ADDITION 20901.87 38031 EGAN MCKAY ELECTRICAL CONTRS REMOVAL & REPLACEMENT OF PCB TRANSFORMERS 1444.40 38032 KENKO INC SERVICE - BLUFFS EAST FOURTH ADDITION 20901.87 38033 BROWN & CHRIS SERVICE - SUNNYBROOK ROAD/NEMEC KNOLLS 38034 BROWN & CHRIS INC 007 .12 SERVICE - BENNETT PLACE & BLOSSOM ROAD 1007444.52 38035 BARBAROSSA AND SONS INC SERVICE - WATER PLANT ADDITION 39475.35 38036 LAYNE WESTERN CO INC SERVICE - WATER PLANT ADDITION 38037 J P NOREX INC SERVICE - WATER PLANT ADDITION 118875.9214 38038 RICE LAKE CONTRACTING SERVICE - HOMEWARD HILLS ROAD 3086.299 7 38039 A & H WELDING & MFG CO CLIP ATTACHMENT- WATER DEPARTMENT 3077.40 38040 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER EQUIPMENT RENTAL-LIQUOR STORE 6 . 38041 A B DICK CO XEROX PAPER-CITY HALL 94.00 38042 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 98.00 38043 ADMIRAL WASTE MGMT INC -OCTOBER 87 TRASH DISPOSAL - PUBLIC 1261.78 SAFETY DEPT 51.75 38044 AFFILIATED EMERGENCY VETERINARY KENNEL COSTS - ANIMAL CONTROL 45.00 38045 AIRSIGNAL INC SUPPLIES - COMMUNITY CENTER 80.00 38046 ALLANSON BUSINESS PRODUCTS INC SUPPLIES - POLICE DEPARTMENT 239.77 38047 AMERI-STAR LIGHTING OUTSIDE LITES FOR SHOP-STREET MAINTENANCE 561.60 38048 AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH CO -SECURITY SYSTEMS - WATER PLANT BUILDING/ 510.00 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING -149 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 9.05 115565496 OCTOBER 20,1987 38050 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BOND PAYMENTS 965.E77 38051 ANDON INC -HELIUM TANKS/VALVES/CONE STRING - RILEY 35.34 LAKE BEACH Jr ')52 EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOC INC SIGNS - STREET MAINTENANCE/PARK DEPARTMENT 319.00 .J53 ARMOR SECURITY INC 4TH QTR 87 SECURITY SYSTEM-SENIOR CENTER 142.50 38054 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC BLACKTOP - STREET MAINTENANCE 15749.01 38055 AWARDS INC SUPPLIES - CITY HALL 440.00 38056 B R W INC -SERVICE - ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY - TH 169 14548.89 -SERVICE - ANDERSON LAKES PKWY-TH 169 TO -MITCHELL RD/DELL RD-EVENER FEASIBILITY/ VALLEY VIEW RD-MITCHELL TO COUNTY RD 4 38057 GWEN L BARKER -SUPPLIES - SUNBONNET DAY - HISTORICAL 19.78 CULTURE COMMISSION 38058 BARTLEY SALES COMPANY INC REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - COMMUNITY CENTER 31.14 38059 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC EQUIPMENT PARTS - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 357.79 38060 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE PRINTING - FORESTRY DEPT 38.76 38061 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY SERVICE 959.75 38062 SAM BLOOM IRON &METAL CO EQUIPMENT PARTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 5.00 38063 BLOOMINGTON LOCK& SAFE -LOCK REPAIRS-FIRE BUILDING/PUBLIC SAFETY 72.00 BUILDING 38064 B.UMBERG COMMUNICATIONS INC TABLE-COMMUNITY SERVICES 179.91 38065 BMB SERVICES POOL REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER 25.00 38066 BMS OFFICE STORES INC TYPEWRITER REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 39.00 38067 LOIS BOETTCHER -PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING 67.81 MINUTES FOR 9/21/87 38068 PAUL BROWN FOOTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 348.00 38069 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC -BLACKTOP - STREET DEPARTMENT/PARK 662.74 DEPARTMENT 38070 NATHAN BUCK SOFTBALL & FOOTBALL OFFICIAL - FEES PAID 464.00 71 BUSINESS FURNITURE INC 8 CHAIRS-WATER DEPT 1296.00 ,,,,J72 JOHN BULTMAN SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 304.50 38073 CARLSON & CARLSON ASSOC SERVICE - EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 250.00 38074 DAN CARLSON EXPENSES - PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT 14.00 38075 CARLSONS LAKE STATE EQUIP CO EQUIPMENT PARTS - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 930.22 38076 CENTRAIRIE INC -REPLACED LIMIT SWITCHES & TIMER/INCREASE 866.21 -BLOWER SPEED/REPLACED FILTER/REPAIR G.V.C. & COOLING TOWER-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 38077 CERTIFIED RUSTPROOFERS INC RUSTPROOFING-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 135.00 38078 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO LEGAL ADS 145.08 38079 JAMES G CLARK EXPENSES - JULY STORM DAMAGE 70.00 38080 CLASSIC LANDSCAPING TIMBERS - JULY STORM DAMAGE 2750.00 38081 CLUTS OBRIEN STROTHER ARCHITECTS SERVICE-8950 EDEN PRAIRIE RD 4049.86 38082 CMI REFRIGERATION INC REFRIGERATOR REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER 66.35 38083 COPPIN S & W REFUND - PLUMBING PERMIT 20.50 38084 COPY EQUIPMENT INC BLUEPRINT SUPPLIES - ENGINEERING DEPT 258.88 38085 CORNERSTONE ADVOCACY SERVICE -THIRD QUARTER 87 OF BATTERED WOMEN RIGHTS 1250.00 COMMISSION 38086 CROWN AUTO INC PARTS-POLICE DEPT/STREET MAINTENANCE 64.40 38087 CRYSTAPLEX PLASTICS INC PLEXI-GLASS-ICE ARENA 110.00 38088 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME - WATER DEPARTMENT 4974.61 38089 CUSTOM AUTOBODY TRUCK REPAIR-WATER DEPT 634.00 38090 DALCO CLEANING SUPPLIES - ICE ARENA 670.08 38091 MONICA M DAY EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER - HUMAN RESOURCES 265.00 38092 DAY-TIMERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES - PLANNING DEPT 16.95 ?'^13 DELUXE COMPUTER FORMS SUPPLIES - POLICE DEPARTMENT 88.33 5470105 OCTOBER 20,1987 • 38094 EUGENE DIETZ SEPTEMBER 87 EXPENSES 165.00 38095 DIXIE PETRO-CHEM INC CHLORINE - WATER DEPARTMENT 820.00 38096 DONS SOD SERVICE -REPLACE SOD-PRESERVE BLVD/VALLEY VIEW RD- 217.80 { JULY STORM DAMAGE J97 DON'S APPLICANCE AND TV -DISHWASHER REPAIR DUE TO STORM DAMAGE - 74.90 SENIOR CENTER 38098 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU EXPENSES - CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 100.61 38099 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU EXPENSES - COMMUNITY CENTER 496.79 38100 DUSTCOATING INC OIL FOR DUST CONTROL - STREET MAINTENANCE 1518.00 38101 DYNA SYTEMS NUTS/BOLTS/WASHERS-WATER DEPT 363.48 38102 EDEN PRAIRIE TRASHTRONICS SEPTEMBER 87 TRASH DISPOSAL 365.00 38103 ROBERT ENGSTROM ASSOC INC REFUND - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PAYOFF 1423.71 38104 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC -MANHOLE COVERS - SEWER DEPARTMENT/CURB 446.00 BOX-STREET MAINTENANCE 38105 TIM ERNHART • EXPENSES- WATER DEPARTMENT 24.68 38106 FACILITY SYSTEMS INC -INSTALLATION OF MODULAR WORK STATION- 1122.24 CITY HALL 38107 FAIRCHILD MARKETING ADS-LIQUOR STORE 365.00 38108 FIRST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE CENT ANTENNA FOR CELLULAR PHONE-POLICE DEPT 30.00 38109 FLEET MAINTENANCE INC TRUCK REPAIRS-STREET MAINTENANCE 6477.75 38110 FLYING CLOUD SANITARY LANDFILL WASTE DISPOSAL-FORESTRY DEPT 25.40 38111 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY SUPPLIES - LIQUOR STORE 629.03 38112 FORKLIFT AND EQUIPMENT SERVICES I FORKLIFT REPAIR - WATER DEPARTMENT 862.05 38113 JOHN HENRY FOSTER MINNESOTA INC EQUIPMENT REPAIRS - COMMUNITY CENTER 110.70 38114 JOHN FRANE AUGUST 87 EXPENSES 165.00 38115 FRANCIS GREENHOUSE & FLORAL SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPARTMENT 26.00 38116 LYNDELL FREY MILEAGE 126.25 38117 G& K SERVICES -TOWELS/COVERALLS - PARK DEPARTMENT/WATER 401.66 DEPARTMENT/LIQUOR STORE 18 GARRITY INDUSTRIES INC SUPPLIES- FIRE DEPARTMENT 154.74 ,119 DARRELL GEDNEY HOCKEY OFFICAL/FEES PAID 165.00 38120 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC RADIO REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 22.77 38121 GENERAL FILTER COMPANY -REPAIR OF SECOND BASIN NO 2 CLARIFIER - 1123.16 WATER TREATMENT PLANT 38122 JOE GLEASON -HOCKEY/SOFTBALL AND FOOTBALL OFFICIAL/ 426.50 FEES PAID 38123 GOPHER OIL COMPANY HYDRAULIC OIL-WATER DEPT 160.75 38124 LARRY GONROWSKI HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 49.50 38125 GOODYEAR TRUCK TIRE CENTERS 12 TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 645.12 38126 GRAF - VORWERK & ASSOCIATES INC -INSTRUCTORS FEE FOR SUBJECT CONTROL 1200.00 COURSE-POLICE DEPT 38127 W W GRAINGER INC -BIN UNIT/PANEL KITS/SHELF KITS- WATER 713.38 DEPARTMENT 38128 GRAN-U-LAWN REFUND WATER METER DEPOSIT 18.14 38129 ALAN GRAY SEPTEMBER 87 EXPENSES 165.00 38130 HACH CO LAB EQUIPMENT - WATER DEPARTMENT 170.31 38131 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC -SERVICE - PIONEER TRAIL & COUNTY ROAD 18/ 19452.72 BLUFFS WEST VICINITY STORM SEWER/BLUFFS EAST FOURTH ADDITION/NEMEC KNOLLS/HDMEI•IARD HILLS PARK/EDEN LAKE PARK/WILLOW PARK • 38132 HARMON GLASS DOOR GLASS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 109.38 38133 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT AUGUST 87 BOOKING FEE 529.20 38134 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER -GRASS SEED - STREET MAINTENANCE/OXYGEN- 104.80 PARK DEPT 35 HENNEPIN CCUNTY TREASURER SERVICE - PLANNING DEPARTMENT 30.00 4159752 5 I OCTOBER 20,1987 , 38136 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS FILING FEE - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 51.50 38137 HENNEPIN COUNTY AUGUST 87 BOARD OF PRISONERS 1382.37 g8138 EUGENE A HICKOK & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE-PURGATORY CREEK RECREATION AREA 526.24 '39 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES - COMMUNITY CENTER 197.85 0140 JACK HOENE HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 58.50 38141 HONEYWELL INC -THIRD QUARTER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT - 3579.00 WATER DEPARTMENT 38142 MICHAEL J HOSTETLER HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 115.50 38143 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #272 EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL 105.00 38144 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC SERVICE - POLICE DEPARTMENT/TONER 632.95 38145 JERRY'S SUPPLIES - HISTORICAL CULTURE COMMISSION 59.80 38146 JESCO INC REFUND - WATER METER DEPOSIT 195.05 38147 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES - WATER DEPARTMENT 963.38 38148 KAY JOHNSON AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 132.00 38149 K MART 3052 SUPPLIES FOR CHILD CARE-COMMUNITY CENTER 251.22 38150 KOCH BUS SERVICE INC TRANSPORTATION-SENIOR CENTER 218.60 38151 KOKESH ATHLETIC SUPPLIES INC GOLF SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 27.37 38152 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER -PAINT/VARNISH/CLEAT/DOWFL/BRUSHES/BRACKET 266.77 -BULBS/SCREWS/SPRAYER/FITTINGS/VISE GRIP/ LEVEL/SPIKES 38153 L A CONSTRUCTION INC EQUIPMENT RENTAL - DRAINAGE CONTROL 990.00 38154 LANCE SUPPLIES - LIQUOR STORE 82.10 38155 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO GLASSES/BOXES - WATER DEPARTMENT 91.32 38156 L MCI T WORKMENS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 42560.00 38157 LMCIT SERVICE 275.00 38158 LEEF BROS INC COVERALLS - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 42.45 38159 F B LEOPOLD COMPANY INC NOZZLES - WATER DEPARTMENT 160.38 38160 DAVID LINDAHL EXPENSES - PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2.50 "161 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR -BRACKET/ROD - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & 25.04 PARK MAINTENANCE jo162 LYMAN LUMBER CO LUMBER - DRAINAGE 64.23 38163 M & I INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC VISE GRIPS - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 24.01 38164 MIKE MARUSHIN -WRENCHES/FLOODLIGH/SAFETY GLASSES - 213.95 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & WATER DEPT 38165 MASTERPIECE PIZZA INC REPAIRS CAUSED FROM WATER SYSTEM FLUSHING 236.59 38166 TIM MCGOVERN HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 84.00 38167 MCGUIRE & SONS PLBG & HTG REPAIR PRESSURE LINE LEAK-COMMUNITY CENTER 101.90 38168 MERLINS HARDWARE HANK SUPPLIES - COMMUNITY CENTER 47.73 38169 METRO PRINTING INC FORMS - POLICE DEPARTMENT 837.00 38170 METROPOLITAN FIRE EQUIP CO FIRE EXTINQUISHERS - (DMMUNITY CENTER 49.95 38171 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION NOVEMBER 87 SEWER SERVICE 89800.90 38172 KAREN MICHAEL MILEAGE 74.b3 38173 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP -BLACKTOP - STREET DEPARTMENT & PARK 1169.58 DEPARTMENT 38174 MINNESOTA COMMUNICATIONS CORP -OCTOBER 87 PAGER RENTAL-POLICE/FIRE & 147.50 WATER DEPARTMENT 38175 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY -2 FIRE COATS $344.00/10 AIR MASK BAGS 649.58 38176 MINUTEMAN PRESS $105.00/8 FT AIR LINE HOSE-FIRE DEPT MEMBERSHIP CARDS PRINTED-COMMUNITY CENTER 124.50 38177 R G MODEEN INC PAINT PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING & FIRE STATIO 1241.40 38178 MOGUL CHEMICALS - PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 83.19 38179 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO -BRAKE CABLE/SWITCH/GENERATOR/VOLTAGE 555.37 REGULATOR/SPRING-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 38180 BERNARD J MULCAHY CO INC RELIEF VALVE - COMMMUNITY CENTER 35.49 31 MY CHEESE SHOP EXPENSES - FIRE DEPARTMENT 25.57 14855896 I, /� OCTOBER 20,1987 38182 MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION 1987 DUES 38183 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN EMPLOYMENT ADS 5243.00 /8184 BETH NILSSON EXPENSES - COMMUNITY CENTER 285 185 NORTH STAR INTL TRUCKS INC RADIATOR SHIELD - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE .26 ..,186 JP NOREX INC -SERVICE - BAKER ROAD/REPAIR CURB BOX - 38. 2 WATER DEPARTMENT 1038.42 38187 NORTHERN CHEMICAL OF LAKEVILLE IN CHEMICALS - WATER DEPARTMENT 1980.00 38188 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO THIRD QUARTER 87 SERVICE 38189 NOTT COMPANY SEAL KIT - WATER DEPARTMENT 61.26 38190 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC REPAIR TYPEWRITER - 19.26 38191 HARRY ORTLOFF HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES p FINANCE DEPARTMENT 60.00 38192 PAGENET SERVICE - POLICE DEPARTMENT 609.90 38193 PAX CHRISTI CATHOLIC CHURCH REFUND- PARK RESERVATION 3.00 38194 PERSONAL REPORT SUBSCRIPTION - POLICE DEPARTMENT 36.00 36.00 38195 PERSONNEL POOL TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT- GENERAL SERVICES 135.68 38196 CONNIE L PETERS MILEAGE 38197 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC SAFETY EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 21.25 38198 PHOTO SECURITY SYSTEMS INC LAMINATOR EQUIPMENT- COMMUNITY CENTER 03 2.00 38199 THE PINK COMPANIES TOWELS - FIRE DEPARTMENT 14.79 38200 PITNEY BOWES INC SERVICE - COMMUNITY CENTER0 .00 38201 POMMER MFG CO INC VOLLEYBALL TROPHIES- COMMUNITY CENTER 108.00 38202 POWER PROCESS EQUIPMENT INC REPAIR METER - WATER DEPARTMENT 21.3 22 5 0 38203 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC FUSES- COMMUNITY CENTER .30 38204 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -GLOVES/INSECT REPELLANT/TAPE/BATTERIES/ 5.2 PAINT/KEYS-CITY HALL 85.29 38205 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -VALVE REPAIR TOOL/VALVE CORES/CEILING -TILE /BOLTS/TAPE/PAINT BRUSHES/FLASHLIGHT 171.39 -SAW BLADE/CEMENT/BATTERIES/SCREWS/NUTS/ -SPRAY BOTTLE/BROOM HANDLE/HAMMER/PIPES/ -HOSE/TRASH CAN/FAN/CLEANING SUPPLIES- 38206 PRAIRIE HARDWARE COMMUNITY CENTER 38207PRAIRIE HARDWARE SUPPLIES - LIQUOR STORE 3.17 -VARNISH/INSECT REPELLANT/BATTERIES/FILTER 113.07 -RUSTOLEUM/SHOVEL/GATE LATCH/HINGES/TAPE/ SPIKES-PARK DEPT 38208 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -PAINT/STRAPS/PIPES/COUPLINGS/BRUSHINGS - 22.52 38209 PRAIRIE HARDWARE SEWER DEPT CAPS/DUSTER/U-JOINTS/BOLTS/KEYS/TAPE/ 57.62 38210 PRAIRIE HARDWARE CABLES/PENS/WIRE CLIPS-STREET DEPT -LOCKS/CLIPS/PLIERS/WEATHER STRIPPING/ 174.94 -NOZZLES/TAPE/CLEANING SUPPLIES/SHOVEL/ -LEVEL/WRENCH/SCREWDRIVERS/KEYS/TRASH BAGS WATER DEPT 38211 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN OIL/BLADE SHARPENING TOOL- FIRE DEPARTMENT 38212 PRINT SHACK -PRINTING - POLICE DEPARTMENT & HISTORICAL 79. 0 CULTURE COMMISSION 79.10 38213 R & R SPECIALTIES INC -SHARPEN ZAMBONI BLADES/2 ZAMBONI BLADES- -$367.00/HYDRAULIC HOSE/CHAIN/FUSES- 590.94 EN 38214 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS OF M11 -SSEPTEEMBERNITyC87T-RSEPTEMBER 88 MAINTENANCE SERVICE 1117.20 38215 ROGER'S SERVICE CO BEARINGS/ALTERNATOR $263.95 38216 RODNEY W RUE EXPENSES 307.45 38217 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO OFFICE SUPPLIES 4.00 '18 SANCO INC 73.23 L CLEANINGSUPPLIES - PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 38.90 1342945 OCTOBER 20,1987 38219 SCHMIDT READY MIX INC CONCRETE - DRAINAGE 355.60 38220 RICK SCHOEN HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 99.00 gR221 SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM INC -SERVICE - FIRE STATION/REPAIR - COMMUNITY 51059.22 CENTER ,,222 SHAKOPEE FORD INC .. -SWITCH/ARM BUSH/CLAMPS/BUMPER/REPAINT 1746.82 38223 JOEL SHIELDS SQUAD #279 $850.00 -283 TIMBERS - HOMEWARD HILLS PARK/125 9259.00 1 TIMBERS-JULY STORM DAMAGE 38224 SHOR-LINE INTERNATIONAL 4 FOOT FETCH POLE - ANIMAL WARDEN 170.64 38225 STEVEN R SINELL EXPENSES 911.70 38226 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP RATCHET WRENCH/GAUGE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 58.65 38227 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC SUPPLIES - RECREATION PROGRAMS 59.27 38228 SOUTHDALE YMCA FOURTH QUARTER 87 SERVICE 2500.00 38229 SOUTHWEST AUTO SUPPLY INC -FILTERS/TEMPERATURE CONTROL/BRAKE PADS/ 2345.02 -BRAKES/WHEEL CYLINDER/ROTORS/CHASSIS/ -BALL JOINT/SHOCKS/MUFFLER/GREASE GUN/ -SPARK PLUGS/SWITCHES/ADAPTOR MIRROR- EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 38230 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC SUNBONNET DAYS AD 212.80 38231 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC EMPLOYMENT AD - COMMUNITY CENTER 11.90 38232 SPECIALTY SCREENING PLAQUES - POLICE & FIRE DEPARTMENT 132.00 38233 SPORTS WORLD USA -GOGGLES/YOUTH TENNIS T-SHIRTS/LIFEGUARD 484.85 UNIFORMS-COMMUNITY CENTER 38234 STANDARD SPRING CO -REPAIR SQUAD CAR SEATS - EQUIPMENT 508.70 MAINTENANCE 38235 STRETCHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ -GUN SUPPLIES/1000 INTOXILYZER MOUTHPIECES 601.46 POLICE DEPARTMENT 38236 SUBURBAN QHEVROLET 1986 CHEVROLET BLAZER 14200.00 ""237 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET -REPAIR TRANSMISSION LEAK/SWITCH/HOUSING- 178.02 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 38238 SULLIVANS SERVICES INC SERVICE - SENIOR CENTER 56.00 38239 GTE/SUN COMMUNITY DIRECTORIES ADS - LIQUOR STORE 840.60 38240 SUPER VALUE REFUND - WATER METER DEPOSIT 295.25 38241 TARGET 220 CALCULATOR - ASSESSING DEPARTMENT 54.99 38242 TENNESSEE CHEMICAL CO FERRIC SULFATE - WATER DEPARTMENT 4185.10 38243 THOMPSON PLUMBING REFUND PLUMBING PERMIT 101.50 38244 TRI-STATE PUMP & CONTROL REPLACE CIRCUIT BREAKERS - LIFTSTATION 674.58 38245 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 28.62 38246 TWIN CITY TESTING -WATER SUPPLY SLUDGE ANALYSIS/COMMUNITY 1400.00 CENTER REMODELING 38247 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS - POLICE DEPARTMENT 417.00 38248 UNITED LABORATORIES INC LAB SUPPLIES - WATER DEPARTMENT 305.38 !' 38249 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICES UNIFORMS - CITY HALL 1424.65 38250 UNIVERSAL TITLE REFUND - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PAYOFF 1423.71 38251 VAN WATERS & ROGERS SODIUM SILICOFLUORIDE - WATER DEPARTMENT 1337.50 38252 VESSCO INC OIL SEALS - WATER DEPARTMENT 69.94 38253 VIKING LABORATORIES CHEMICALS - COMMUNITY CENTER 25.75 38254 KARI WAHL MILEAGE 38.45 38255 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP CO INSTALL 6" CHECK VALVES - LIFT STATION 2889.20 38256 KEITH WALL EXPENSES - POLICE DEPARTMENT 13.05 38257 JIM WALTER PAPERS XEROX PAPER - CITY HALL 674.80 38258 WATER PRODUCTS CO -162 5/8" METERS $7434.18/162 HORNS 10232.58 $2122.20/FLANGE/NOZZLE CAP/CHAIN 38259 WEST WELD ELADES - PARK MAINTENANCE 130.47 60 WHITTEN CORPORATION ROPE ANCHORS - COMMUNITY CENTER 66.00 11157977 1 OCTOBER 20,1987 38261 WILSON TANNER GRAPHICS BUSINESS CARDS - ADDRESS LABELS- CITY HALL 613.00 38262 X-ERGON CHEMICALS - WATER DEPARTMENT 99.44 38263 XEROX CORP SERVICE 367.50 k764 ZACK'S INC ROTARY PUMP KIT- EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 15.24 265 •ZIEGLER INC RINGS/SEALS- EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 109.38 38266 MARY ZIEROTT REFUND - STARING LAKE RESERVATION 50.00 38267 KAY ZUCCARO AQUA AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 145.75 140031 $1660111.28 • • 10 DISTRIBUTIONSpI BY FUND 57 03 11 RTIFICATE OF INDEBT 215372.45 12 CERTIFICATE DEBT FD 154.86 15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M 53374.35 17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE 35334.81 ( PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP 19721.24 N „ UTILITY BOND FUND ':,533973.53 39 86 FIRE STATION CONSTRUCT 44525.48 40 86 FIRE STATION DEBT 393.08 45 UTILITY DEBT FD ARB 417.73 51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 549780.70 55 IMPROVEMENT DEBT FUND ARB 2847.42 73 WATER FUND 49530.38 77 SEWER FUND 92995.22 81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 618.14 87 CDB3 FUND 4049.86 $1660111.28 7/1 1 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CARL J. JULLIE, CITY MANAGER FROM: ROGER A. PAULY, CITY ATTORNEY SUBJECT: ORDINANCE REQUIRING FILING OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BY CANDIDATES AND COMMITTEES DATE: AUGUST 31, 1987 When the above matter was last discussed, it was thought that there was a strong likelihood that the Legislature would amend the provisions of the laws relating to the filing of financial statements in such a manner that the filing require- ments would apply to cities of fewer than 20,000 population. During the 1987 legislative session, House File No. 236 passed out of the House but was either not passed by the Senate or not in the same form and as a result was not enacted into law. When last discussed, the consensus of the Council seemed to be that if the State Legislature did not enact a law which would apply to city elections, the City Council would consider adoption of an ordinance which would impose requirements for filing financial statements upon candidates and committees involving election of persons to city offices. Enclosed here- with please find a draft of such an ordinance. The draft is based primarily upon current state law but is tailored to city elections. Certain departures from state law have been made with a view to clarification and, in some instances, indicating ,'I a choice which seems to be more preferable than that contained in state law. The following are some of the provisions which should be carefully considered. 1. Subd. 1.C. excludes, in the last sentence, from member- ship in a political committee a person who does no more than contribute money to a political committee. This sentence was • included because requiring each person who may be a contributor but has no actual control over the committee to file a finan- cial statement would be excessively burdensome. 2. Subd. 3.A.-D. require the reporting of the names of each person who has made a contribution and the name of each person to whom a disbursement has been made irrespective of the amount of the contribution or disbursement. I believe it may be appropriate to establish threshhold amounts below which the reporting of names would not be required. House File No. 236, for example, does not require the reporting of the names of persons to whom disbursements are made and requires the reporting of names of contributors only where the contribu- tion is equal to or greater than $500. 3. Subd. 6. specifies that in the event a required state- ment is not filed within the time provided, the City Clerk has the obligation to notify, in writing, candidates and committee members of such failure. If the omission is not corrected within ten days, each such candidate and member of a committee to whom such notice has been sent will be guilty of a misdemeanor. That subdivision specifies that failure -2- it to comply with any of the provisions of the section prior to such notice and expiration of such ten days shall not constitute a violation of the section. This subdivision is designed to prevent inadvertent violations on the part of persons who may not be aware of the requirements or not have sufficient organ- ization to ensure compliance. RAP:cw -3- } • 7 ORDINANCE NO. 53-11 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 2 BY ADDING SECTION 2.88 REQUIRING THE FILING OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS RELATING TO RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS BY CANDIDATES AND COMMITTEES IN CONNECTION WITH CITY ELECTIONS AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 2.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Eden Prairie City Code Chapter 2 is amended by adding Section 2.88 thereto, as follows: SEC. 2.88. Subd. 1. Definitions. A. "City election" means an election held in the City at which the voters of the City choose by ballot any public official for the City. B. "Personal campaign committee" means any commit- tee appointed by a candidate for any city election. C. A "political committee" shall consist of every two or more persons who shall cooperate in the raising, collecting, or disbursing of money used, or to be used, for or against the election to public office of any person or any class or number of persons in any city election. A person who does no more than contribute moneyto a political committee shall not be deemed to be a member of a political committee. D. "Disbursements" means every act by or through which any money, property, office, or position or other thing of value passes or is directly or indirectly conveyed, given, promised, paid, expended, pledged, contributed, or lent, and also -1- any money, property, office, or position or other thing of value so given, provided, paid, expended, promised, pledged, contributed, or lent. Subd. 2. Statements to Be Filed. Every candidate and every personal campaign committee shall file a verified financial statement as follows: A. Seven days before the election; and B. Seven days after the election. The statement shall be verified upon the oath of the candidate or the personal campaign committee, as the case may be, and shall cover all transactions made up to and including the third day before the filing of the statement and not accounted for and reported upon in statements theretofore filed. In the event of any transaction occurring after the third day before the filing of the statement after the election, a state- ment setting forth such transaction or transactions shall be filed within thirty days after such transaction. Each statement after the first shall contain a summary of all preceding state- ments and summarize all items theretofore reported under the pro- visions of this subdivision. Subd. 3. Information Required. The statement of a candidate and a personal campaign committee shall give in full detail: A. Every sum of money and all property, and every other thing of value, received by such candidate or committee during such period from any source whatsoever which such candi- ( i, -2- date or the committee uses or has used, or is at liberty to use for political purposes, together with the name of every person or source from which each was received and the date when each was received, together with the total amount received from all sources in any amount or manner; B. Every promise or pledge of money, property, or other thing of value, received by such candidate or committee during such period, the proceeds of which the candidate uses or has used, or is at liberty to use for political purposes, together with the names of the persons by whom each was promised or pledged, the special purposes for which each was promised or pledged, and the date when each was so promised or pledged, together with the total amount promised or pledged from all sources in any amounts or manner; C. Every disbursement by such candidate or commit- tee during such period, together with the name of every person to whom the disbursement is made, the specific purpose for which each was made, and the date when each was made, together with the total amount of disbursements made in any amounts or manner; and D. Every obligation, expressed or implied, to make any disbursement incurred by such candidate or committee during such period, together with the names of the person or persons to or with whom each such obligation has been incurred, the specific purposes for which each was made, and the date when each was incurred, together with the total amount of such obligations made in any amounts or manner. -3- Subd. 4. Statements by Political Committees. Every political committee shall file a verified financial statement within thirty days after a City election. The statement shall set forth the total amount of receipts and disbursements and the purpose or purposes for which the disbursements were made. Subd. 5. Statement Forms. Forms for statements shall be prepared by the City Clerk, and copies thereof, together with a copy of this section of the City Code, shall be furnished to every candidate and committee of which the City Clerk has knowledge, upon the filing for election to public office by the candidate, and to all other persons required by law to file statements who may apply therefor. The verified financial state- ments shall be filed with the City Clerk. Subd. 6. Notice and Penalty. The City Clerk shall notify a candidate and the members of a committee, in writing, of the failure to comply with this Section immediately upon the expiration of the time fixed for filing of a statement, and if the provisions of this Section shall not be complied with within ten days after the mailing of such notice, such candidate and each member of a committee required to file such statement to whom such notice has been sent shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Any failure to comply with the provisions of this Section prior to such notice and expiration of such ten days shall not consti- tute a violation of this Section. Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including -4- Penalty for Violation" and Section 2.99 are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of 1987, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1987. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1987. RAP2 8457-1 8-31-87 {{ -5- nn t 01 l�. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #87-283 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WINDSONG II FOR THE KOOSMAN AND RICE COMPANY BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That he ry t of datedtOctoberi14,1d1987,aconsistingoof 1.43 II or acreseintoos4an lots,1d Rice a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 20th day of October, 1987. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk i r STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner TH�R UGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: September 25, 1987 • PROJECT: Windsong II 2nd Addition LOCATION: East of Anderson Lakes Parkway, south of Technology Drive APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Koosman Homes REQUEST: Preliminary Plat of approximately 1.43 acres into four lots. Background This site is part of the Windsong II :a`r- Addition previously reviewed and �+ approved by the Planning Commission -=`S"N0`' �J^I and City Council on July 15, 1986. ,ar.E E The original request for this project was the Preliminary Platting of 39.62 acres into 20 lots and 6 n' ` '.' outlots and a Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 12.03 acres ; PROPOSED SITE C to allow for the construction of 72 ` , (18, 4-plex) units. The current - request is for the Preliminary / j - Platting of approximately 1.43 acres RM-2.5 into 4 lots to allow for the ` l -// ' construction of two, 5-unit build- 1 , • a ings and two accessory storage ',' RM-2.5 buildings. - Revised Preliminary Plat '® aj t j �W o 3 The proposed preliminary plat ' �,�m� \ reflects the adjustment of Lots 13 , m " �� ` z�., and 15 on the original plat and the � ,nme�.i elimination of Lot 14. The reason ;*t�,l� '.�a..��_ • �� for the lot line adjustments and "�""� elimination is due to poor soil Esc" a (� conditions located to the north of isg:1fpe, o, PA �1 the cul-de-sac depicted as Outlot A 4 • ��.• 1��_ t�fon the plans. Asa consequence, the Ur rAt v e#,` /I 0. . proponent had to eliminate one, 4- •^ unit building, thus reducing the AREA LOCATION MAP number of total units to 68. { Windsong II 2nd Addition 2 September 25, 1987 In order to increase the number of units consistent with the approved plan, the proponent has redesigned three of the structures as five-unit buildings. The proponent has indicated that Lots 11, 13, and 15 on the original plat would be designated for 5-unit buildings. This would increase the total number of units to 71 with an overall density of 5.9 units per acre. The proponent has submitted building elevations which indicate that the buildings have been designed consistent with what is currently being built. Plan revisions would include that the 5-unit building elevation be revised to reflect additional brick along the three-stall garage area to provide more of a balance on the unit and that berming be placed within the project area along the five-unit buildings and around the storage buildings to help screen the garage doors. In addition, the plans shall also be revised to reflect two additional parking stalls and tree size as depicted on the approved landscape plan (See Attachment A). Finally, the preliminary plat depicts Lot 12 which is a proposed 4- unit building as being within approximately six feet of the new lot line. Based on RM-6.5 zoning requirements, the proponent is required to maintain a 10-foot minimum sideyard setback from the lot line. The proponent will be required to revise the plan to reflect the minimum 10-foot setback. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff would recommend approval of the request for the preliminary plat of 1.43 acres into 4 lots based upon the Staff Report dated September 25, 1987, subject to the following recommendations: 1. Prior to Final Plat approval, the proponent shall: A. Revise the landscape and grading plan to reflect berms in those areas around the five-unit buildings and storage buildings to help screen the overhead garage doors. The plans shall also be revised to reflect an additional two parking stalls and tree sizes as depicted on the approved landscape plan. B. Revise the 5-unit building elevation to reflect additional brick consistent with the existing buildings. C. Revise the final plat to reflect a minimum 10-foot building setback along the proposed southern property line. 2. Prior to Building permit issuance, the proponent shall pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee. a •f1 tj a\Ptrir#t. .s lI -A 1'yP keit ' r , Berm' •" . �r�',-,tt- ''-";' r - " !_' 'ff tea ay+ t . ,,....*.•4s?t tt i 4 4;4 •r, . . ........„,„, .r:„.. , . .... _ as. - 1 - 1 - ....i , : „...,,, ,.--., ;1.15:- ..:, ..-,* .$ ":;,e,,,,,,.. .. . . . - f \ ,,, ,..,,%.:,,,", awl *110 .,...{-" . . - • roil , K . . � s • w..�a c �� {rA 3AS ' o 11Gr �' v t'dtli• u 1 ®�j ai • ) . : -,-----; ( 1 ATTACHMENT A `t Planning Commission Minutes -3- September 28, 1987 • B. WINDSONG II, by The Koosman & Rice Company. Request for Preliminary Plat of 1.43 acres into 4 lots. A public hearing. Planner Uram explained that due to a poor soil condition, the proponent was required to eliminate one four-unit building. Because of that the proponent has redesigned three of the structures as five-unit buildings in order to increase the number of units consistent with the approved plan. This change will decrease the total number of units to 71 with an overall density of 5.9 units per acre. Staff is recommending approval of the project subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report. • Chairman Schuck asked for comments. There were none. PQTICN 1: Motion was made by Anderson, seconded by Ruebling, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5-0-0. • • 1;OTICN 2: Motion was made by Anderson, seconded by Ruebling, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Koosman &Rice Company for preliminary plat of 1.43 acres into four lots for Windsong II, based on plans dated September 3, 1987, subject to the recommendation of the Staff Report dated September 25, 1987. Motion carried 5-0-0. To: City Councilmembers From: Gary D. Peterson kDate: October 15, 1987 Subject: Call for a Comprehensive Waste Management Program The subject of the landfill (dump) has consumed much of our thought and discussion, and will continue to demand much of our attention. However, there are a number of other elements related to garbage that we have discussed but not finalized. It would be wise, I think, for us to address them and develop a position, or positions. Following is a list, not necessarily exhaustive, that we might want to consider: - Organized collection. Its role in designating our waste stream, economic and administrative implications. What variety of "organized" systems are available to us? - Recycling. Source or mechanical, i.e., the Reuter DRDF system; evaluating our current pilot yard waste program. Questions - will Met Council enlarge its definition of recycling to include mechanical; The County's position? The County has mandated Jan. 1, 1988 as the date by which we are to have an approved recyling program in operation, or clearly on the drawing board. - Compost facility. Would we support a Reuter compost facility in Eden Prairie? Under what conditions? What if we could "trade" an approval in exchange for the landfill expansion? Please keep that last question private, if possible. If it has merit we might not want to share it with BFI at this time. Action: Delay, Ignore, or Approve the Call for a Comprehensive Waste Management Program that would address the above and other related items. Suggestion, if approved: Direct staff to research and respond with answers, options, and suggestions by November 2, 1987. i 1 1 MEMORANDUM • TO: Mayor and City Council ,Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services Pitie(, DATE: June 10, 1987 SUBJECT: Recommendations on Edenvale Trail & Review of EAW Attached is a copy of the letter that has been sent out to over 600 residents that live in the vicinity of the Edenvale Park, which outlines the history of Council actions to date and a copy of the EAW that was completed as per City Council request. Commission and Council members will note that the EAW has determined that the proposed trail around the marsh and along the creek corridor in this vicinity would have no significant environmental effects. The EAW was reviewed Denis Hahn, Naturalist from the Hennepin County Park Reserve District, and by DNR staff, who also walked the site with our City Park Planner. Since the last City meeting regarding this proposed trail, several things have happended: 1. The City began mowing the proposed walking path on top of the interceptor line from the park area approximately two-thirds of the way north toward the "hour glass" area. 2. The dredging of the open water in the marsh area as required by the DNR for mitigation of Valley View Road was completed early in 19B7. 3. In April of 1987 a large fire swept through the marsh after one of the driest winter and spring seasons on record. Upon review of the EAW and having determined the findings are negative, staff now recommends the City authorize construction of the pedestrian bridge to be constructed at the end of Hillcrest Court and a mowed trail developed from the bridge south to the Edenvale Park area. A mowed trail will require installation of two small culverts with a limited amount of fill over the culverts. The proposed pedestrian bridge would be constructed to allow pedestrian use only. This would be considered a first phase development of this portion of the trail; a second phase would not be recommended until citizens requested upgrading of the trail. This trail construction would have a minimal impact on the park and the construction of the bridge would restrict any motorcycles, 3 wheelers, etc. by design. Staff would also request authorization to construct a wildlife blind adjacent • to the open water area to allow for wildlife observation. The blind and woodchip path to the blind would be proposed for construction during the fi 9 winter of 1987-88. Estimated cost of the pedestrian bridge and mowed path is / aproximately $2,000. Estimated cost of the wildlife blind and woodchip path ( is $500. Staff has been monitoring the water level of the proposed location for the nature trail and proposes to continue to do so for the next year or two prior to constructing a woodchip trail at that time. BL:md ( . ��la June 8, 1987 TO: Residents Edenvale Park Area RE: Edenvale Trail EAW In the summer of 1986, the City held several hearings relating to a proposed trail system around the Edenvale marsh area. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission first reviewed the trail system with area residents at a July 7, 1986 meeting. The majority of the residents attending that meeting opposed the trail for a variety of reasons including concerns relating to privacy and to a possible negative environmental impact on the marsh. Dn August 5, 1986, the Eden Prairie City Council held a meeting to hear from area residents regarding their concerns, both pro and con, regarding the installation of this proposed trail. At that meeting, the Council also received a copy of a petition to the EQB from residents adjacent to Edenvale Park for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet and an Environmental Impact Statement on the Purgatory Creek Trail System Project. The City Council d continued the item to a September 2nd meeting. Dn September 2nd, the Mayor and City Council received a petition for an EAW on the Purgatory Creek corridor system project from James P. Cullen, 15381 Creekside Court. At the September 2nd meeting, staff also submitted a recommendation to complete an EAW, though it was not mandatory, in hopes that it would serve to answer some of the questions and alleviate some of the concerns of that trail on the marsh area. The City Council continued the item to October 7th, and requested City staff to meet with the area residents to discuss phasing and other alternatives to the proposed trail system. On September 22nd, the Director of Community Services, the City Forester and Mr. Dennis Hahn, Naturalist for the Hennepin Park System, were invited to meet with residents of the Edenvale Park neighborhood to discuss concerns relating to the proposed trail. The majority of the residents suggested an "experimental trail" that might be installed by simply mowing the existing grass in the trail location and allowing people access via mowed trails. At the October 7th meeting, the City Council adopted the following recommendations: 1. In the fall of 1986 begin mowing the trail corridor along the top of the interceptor to provide limited access to the creek valley for nature observation. _ 2. After dredging, as required by the DNR, is completed, construct a woodchip trail to a nature blind that could be used to observe waterfowl and other wildlife in the marsh area in the vicinity of the newly created pond. r 3. Directed staff to work with a professional naturalist on developing a f/ proposed trail system that would provide access to the western part of the t marsh with minimal impact on the resource of that marsh. The Council continued the item to November 18th to decide on whether or not any EAW should be completed, as per the petition to the EQB. On November 18th, the Council ordered the staff to proceed with the completion of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet to assess the impact of the proposed trail on the Edenvale Park marsh area. The Environmental Assessment Worksheet has been completed and will be reviewed by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission at their June 15th meeting. Any residents wishing to review the EAW may stop by the Eden Prairie City Hall and review a copy of the EAW at the Community Services Department. All residents interested in hearing the discussion on the Environmental Assessment Worksheet are welcome to attend the June 15th meeting which will be held at the Eden Prairie City Hall, 7600 Executive Drive, at 7:30 P. M. Sincerely, Robert A. Lambert Director of Community Services dr RAL:md 21, CITY OFFICES,7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE I EDEN PRAIRIE,MN 55344-2499!TELEPHONE(612)937.2262 • `cI`r - r August 31, 1987 prat rim TO: Residents Edenvale Park Area Dear Resident: In early 1986, the City Council requested Staff to develop a trail system plan for the Edenvale Park area, and to review the system plan with the neighborhood prior to submitting it to the City Council for a final review. As a part of that review process a petition was submitted by area residents for an environmental analysis. The request was for the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) and the City of Eden Prairie to consider an Environmental Assessment Worksheet and an Environmental Impact Statement on a Purgatory Creek Corridor Trail System Project. The EQB Staff and the City Council agreed that an Environmental Impact Statement was not necessary; however, the City Council requested Staff to complete an Environmental Assessment Worksheet on the proposed nature trail and transportation trail within the Edenvale Park Conservancy Area. The EAW was completed earlier this year and was scheduled for review by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission at the June 15th meeting. At that meeting, several residents voiced a concern that they had not had sufficient time to review the EAW and requested the Commission continue the item to the September 21st meeting. All appropriate regulating agencies have reviewed the EAW and found there is no negative impact on the conservancy area by the proposed trail. The recommendation of City Staff will be to complete the following: 1. Extend the mowed trail along the east side of the creek to Hillcrest Court. This mowed trail will require the installation of two small culverts with a limited amount of fill over the culverts. 2. Construct a pedestrian bridge over the creek at the end of Hillcrest Court. The proposed bridge would be constructed to allow pedestrian use only. This would be considered a first phase development of this portion of the trail. A second phase would not be recommended until residents requested upgrading of the trail. This trail construction would have a minimal impact on the park and the construction of the bridge would restrict any motorcycles, 3-wheelers, etc. by design. 3. Staff would also request authorization to construct a wildlife blind adjacent to the open water area to allow for wildlife observation. 4. Staff would continue to monitor the water level of the proposed location of a nature trail for the next year or two prior to recommending construction of a wood chip trail around the perimeter of the marsh at that time. Estimated cost of the pedestrian bridge and mowed path is approximately $2,000. Estimated cost of the wildlife blind and wood chip path is approximately $500. Residents are invited to attend the September 21st meeting which will held at the Eden Prairie City Hall, 7600 Executive Drive, at 7:30 P.M. Sincerely, Robert . Lambert Director of Community Services RAL/cd 10/6/87 UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION • -5- 4. Senior Men's Hockey - Summer 1987 5. Sand Volleyball - Summer 1987 Lambert said that this is a summary of the number of teams, revenue generated and costs involved. MOTION: Baker moved to recommend approval of the reports. Cook seconded the motion and it passed 5-0. C. City Council Report of September 2 & 15, 1987 At the September 15 meeting, the Council approved the renaming of Wyndham Knolls Park, the request by Stan Tiekela for a transfer of ownership of property near Birch Island Park and the going out for bids for Community Center repair. VII. OLD BUSINESS A. Edenvale Park Trail EAW Refer to letter dated August 31, 1987 from Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services, memo dated June 10, 1987 from Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services and letter dated June 8, 1987 from Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services. Lambert said that this process started over a year ago. The EAW which is reviewed by 18 governmental agencies has been completed. Lambert read a letter he received from Jerry Johnson who said he agrees with the City's recommendation which is to begin mowing a path on top of the interceptor to the Hillcrest Court area and construct a pedestrian bridge which would restrict the use of motorized vehicles. The bridge would have to be approved by the Watershed District. Culverts would need to be put in and Lambert recommends the trail be left in this condition until there is sufficient use to require otherwise. The City will continue to monitor the water level for a couple more years.Prior to putting in an asphalt trail, residents would be notified. He showed the location of the proposed trail. Tim Line of 7320 Ontario Blvd. said they are new residents to the neighborhood, but purchased their home with the understanding that this property would remain undeveloped. He feels that development of this land will interfere with wildlife and he sees a bridge in this area as dangerous. Line said the present path is not used except for access to graffiti bridge and he feels that money should be spent on education and access to workplaces. He added that he likes the peace and quiet in this area, but he feels the amount of parks in a city can be overdone and that you don't need paths to reach a swamp in the center of a neighborhood. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION -6- James Cullen, spokesman for the neighborhood group, said there has to be a distinction between recreation and parks and nature. He said he has reviewed the EAW with his attorney and noted that it was filed in August of 1986. Cullen has come to the conclusion that the City has a definite plan for the development of the Purgatory Creek area. He read portions of an article which was printed in_Lhe Eden Prairie News. Cullen requests that the City do an EIS on all projects that are planned. He believes that there will be an impact on the environment and wildlife and the EIS should include the entire creek corridor. George Carlson of 16171 S. Hillcrest Court said he is in favor of the park. The area is not beautiful until you get into it and he believes this would be an excellent area for cross country skiing. The proposed trail and bridge would give residents a way to the east and would also be good for runners. Carlson said that 2/3 of the residents in the Hillcrest area he has spoken to were in favor of the trail. He read a list of names of those in favor and those opposed to the plan. Carlson said this list was given to the City Council. Pat Richard said that the people he spoke to while he was on the park referendum group were in favor of trails, but that only one person is at this meeting who is in favor of the trail. Carlson said it is difficult to get a group to attend a meeting. Dick Brown of 7027 Edenvale said that the two main igauaa ro be considered are the environmental impact and access to a mihlic area. He believes it should not be a protected area to be used only by a select few and he is satisfied with the EAW. Denny Hoffman of 15560 Edgewood Court said that residents on this street are very affected by this proposal. His concern is that, as a developer and builder, he hears many comments from people who are in favor of trails for the future but he feels these items should not be tied into the development. Hoffman is also concerned with the environmental impact. He has not seen a design of this program, but feels the current system +y is adequate. Cullen said that one of the main objections is that this will mainly be a transportation trail and that within a couple of years there will be an 8' asphalt trail here. He added that his group is totally in favor of asphalt trails along roadways, but not in this type of environment. 1y �. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION -7- Lambert said the EAW was dons using theworst possible scenario (as referred to by some residents) which is an asphalt trail and the EAW indicated no significant impact. Other areas in the creek valley are related only by connection with other trails along City streets and the City attorney does not believe that they are related in any other way and that the EAW was adequate. Mikkelson said that he appreciates what is being said about asphalt trails since he is also not in favor of them 1.n sensitive areas. If the trail could remain a wood chip trail, he would agree with its construction since it would be used only for accessibility of the people into this area. He asked if an EIS was done on the entire area, would the neighborhood group agree with it if it had no negative impact on the environment, or are the residents interested in preserving their own peace and quiet only. Cullen said he does not feel anyone should be selfish about the area; however, they envision vehicular traffic on an asphalt trail in the future. If a trail were used only for people walking, they would have no objection. Carl Nelson asked what would be involved in Phase 2. Lambert replied that the EAW considered a trail all the way up the creek corridor and found no environmental impact. Nelson said he does not disagree with a mowed trail and pedestrian bridge. Lori Line of 7320 Ontario Blvd. said she is concerned because all the residents are not informed as to what is going on in this area. George Carlson commented that he feels this issue has been going on long enough and since no one objects to a mowed trail, it should be done. MOTION: Baker moved to recommend that a mowed trail be extended along the east side of the creek to Hillcrest Court and that a pedestrian bridge be constructed which would restrict vehicular use, a wildlife blind should be constructed also and the water level should continue to be monitored. Mikkelson seconded the motion. On call for discussion, Cook added that any request for an asphalt trail would require the residents to be notified before any decision was made. .Toyer said that she voted against this issue at first, but feels this plan will bring minimal environmental impact to the area. The motion passed 5-0. After discussion, it was decided to bring this issue before the City Council on the third Tuesday in October. • E.R.•(filled in by EQ8) 5/1/84 Environmental Assessment Worksheet(EAW) 1. MARK APPROPRIATE BOX: 0 REGULAR EAW ❑ SCOPING EAW NOTE TO REVIEWERS:For regular EAWs,written comments should address the accuracy and completeness of the EAW information,potential impacts that may warrant investigation and/or the need for an EIS.For scoping EAWs,written com- ments should address the accuracy and completeness of the information and suggest issues for investigation in the EIS.Such comments must be submitted to the Responsible Government Unit(RGU)during the 30-day period following notice of the EAW's availability in the EQB Monitor.Contact the EQB(metro:612/296.8253:non-metro:1.800-652.9747,ask for envi- ronmental review program)or the RGU to find out when the 30-day comment period ends. 1. Project Name Fdenvale Conservancy Area Nature Trail 2. Proposer City of Fden Prairie 3. RGU Same as #2 Contact Person Rnbert A. lambert Contact Person Robert A. Lambert Address 7600 Executive Drive and Title Director of Community Services Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Address 7Cilfl Fxerittive Drive Phone (6121937-2262. ext. 270 Eden Prairie. MN 55344 Phone (612)937-2262, ext. 270 4. Project Location: 'Is 'Is Section Township 116 Range_22 See attached sheet a. County Name Hennepin City/Township Name Eden Prairie b. Attach copies of each of the following to the EAW: I. a county map showing the general area of the project. 2. a copy(ies)of USGS 7'/2 minute,1:24,000 scale map. 3. a site plan showing the location of significant features such as proposed structures,roads,extent of flood plain, wetlands,wells,etc. 4. an existing land use map and a zoning map of the immediate area,if available. 5. Describe the proposed project completely(attach additional sheets as necessary). See Attached Sheet 1 1 6. Reason for EAW preparation:Discretionary Petition List all mandatory category rule which apply: 7. Estimated construction cost g45.nnn 8. Total project area(acres) .inn at rpc or length(miles) 9. Number of residential units none or commercial,industrial.or institutional square footage none 10. Number of proposed parking spaces none 1 1. List all known local,state and federal permits/approvals/funding required: Level of Government Type of Application Status 'I Federal: State: Department of Natural Resources f� Local: Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District 12. Is the proposed project inconsistent with the local adopted comprehensive land use nn plan or any other adopted plans? t.A� No ❑ Yes If yes,explain: 13. Describe current and recent past land use and development on and near the site. • See attached sheet 1 14• Approximately how many acres of the site are in each of the following categories? (Acreages should add up to total project area before and after construction.) Before After Before After Forest/Wooded 21T 21X Wetland(types 3-8) 55.5% 55.3% Cropland f1X (IT Impervious Surface Brush/grassland 2(1...2% 19 g¢)ther(specify) 15. Describe the soils on the site,giving the SCS soil classification types,if known. See attached sheet 16. Does the site contain peat soils,highly erodible soils,steep slopes,sinkholes,shallow limestone formations,abandoned wells,or any geologic hazards?If yes,show on site map and explain: ❑ No ® Yes See attached sheet. 17. What is the approximate depth(in feet)to: 2 a. groundwater_p__m in.2 avg. b. bedrocklfint min.u02avg. 18. Does any part of the project area involve: a. shoreland zoning district? LI No [I Yes b. delineated 100-year flood plain? No Yes c. state or federally designated river land use district? No Yes If yes,identify water body and applicable state classification(s),and describe measures to protect water and related land resources: • See attached sheet 19. Describe any physical alteration(e.g.,dikes.excavation,fill,stream diversion)of any drainage system,lake,stream,and/or wetland.Describe measures to minimize im • - pairment of the water-related resources.Estimate quantity of material to be dredged and indicate where spoils will be deposited. See attached sheet 20. a.Will the project require an appropriation of ground or surface water?If yes,explain (indicate quantity and source): El No ❑ Yes b.Will the project affect groundwater levels in any wells(on or off the site)?If yes,ex. plain: ® No ❑ Yes 21. Describe the erosion and sedimentation control measures to be used during and after construction of the project. See attached sheet 22. a. Will the project generate:I. surface and stormwater runoff? No ® Yes 2. sanitary wastewater? No Yes 3. industrial wastewater? ,.X. No — Yes 4. cooling water(contact and noncontact)? _(. No — Yes If yes.identify sources,volumes,quality(if other than normal domestic sewage), • and treatment methods.Give the basis or methodology of estimates. b. Identify receiving waters,including groundwater,and evaluate the impacts of the discharges listed above.If discharges to groundwater are anticipated,provide per- colation/permeability and other hydrogeulogical test data,if available. N/A 23. Will the project generate(either during or after construction': I — a. air pollution? No Yes h. dust? .X No Yes c. noise? No X. Yes d. odors? No — Yes If yes explain.including as appropriate:distances to sensitive land uses:expected les- els and duration of noise;types and quantities of air pollutants from stacks,mobile sources,and fugitive emissions(dust);odor sources;and mitigative measures for any impacts.Give the basis or methodology of estimates. ( See attached sheet 3 24. Describe the type and amount of solid and/or hazardous waste including sludges and ashes that will be generated and the method and location of disposal: { 25. Will the project affect: a. fish or wildlife habitat,or movement of animals? ® No ❑ Yes b. any native species that are officially listed as state endangered,threatened,or of special concern(animals and/or plants)? ® No ❑ Yes .� If yes,explain(identify species and describe impact): See attached from Denis R. Hahn, Outdoor Education Supervisor for Hennepin County Parks 26. Do any historical,archaeological or architectural resources exist on or near the project al site?If yes,explain(show resources on a site map and describe impact): LA.I No ❑ Yes ) 27. Wili the project cause the impairment or destruction ol: a. designated park or recreation areas? No Yes b. prime or unique farmlands? No Yes c. ecologically sensitive areas? No Yes d. scenic views and vistas? No Yes e. other unique resources(specify)? No Yes If es,explain: See attached from Denis R. Hahn, Dutdoor Education Supervisor..for Hennepin County Parks 28. For each affected road indicate the current average daily traffic(ADT(.increase in ADT contributed by the project and the directional distributions of traffic. ) Negligible 29. Are adequate utilities and public services now available to service the project?If not, what additional utilities and/or services will be required? ❑ No © Yes Summary of Issues For regular EAWs,list the issues as identified by"yes"answers above.Discuss alternatives and mitigative measures for these issues.For scoping EAWs,list known issues,alternatives,and mitigative measures to be addressed in EIS. Items 16; 18a & b; and 23 have been reviewed under their 'respective headings. These items have little, if any, environmental impact since they are being addressed in a manner consistent with State and City ordinances and normal site construction methods. CERTIFICATION BY RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENTAL UNIT I hereby certify that the information contained in this document Is true and complete to the best of my knowledge and that copies of the completed EAW have been made available to all points on the official EQB distribution list. Signature Date 4 Title )4.) 5. The project will include an 8' wide interpretive nature trail through the Edenvale Conservation Area. This trail will provide access and information to an abundant (" wealth of wildlife and wet meadow vegetation. The trail will be developed in • several different phases as follows: - 1987 - An 8' wide mowed trail will be located within the existing interceptor sewer easement running parallel to the creek on the east side. A small foot bridge will be constructed linking the trail to Hillcrest Court. This link will provide safe, dry passage for the neighbors west of the creek to their neighborhood park (Edenvale Park). - 1988 - A wildlife blind will be constructed east of the creek for residents to enjoy the wide variety of fauna that live in the area. - 1989-1990 - An 8' wide woodchip interpretive trail will be extended around the perimeter of the wetland and signed to provide information. - 1991 - The mowed trail near the interceptor sewer will be paved with asphalt, a foot bridge will be installed to connect the interpretive trail to the park and a wildlife blind on the west side of the creek will be constructed. - 199? - Whenever the Anderson parcel is developed, and the City acquires the floodplain north of the "hour glass" the City will develop a woodchip trail north through the "hour glass" to connect with City parkland to the north. This woodchip nature trail will provide a pedestrian loop with the trail adjacent to Edenvale Blvd. This section of trail will be developed as a 6' wide woodchip trail with some sections requiring a board walk on the marsh. 13. The land is currently, and has always been, designated as public open space, floodplain and parkland. The southeast corner of the site includes a neigborhood park with facilities consisting of a hockey and free skating rink, warming house, softball field, parking for 18 cars and a playstructure. An 8' bituminous trail runs along the southern edge of the site parallel to Valley View Road, as well as a trail that runs along the eastern edge of the site along Edenvale Blvd. Two well houses are under construction this summer (1987), as well as a 60" sanitary sewer which presently exists on the site along Edenvale Blvd. Single family residential occurs around the southern, western and northern edges of the site. Medium density residential is planned along the eastern edge of the property. 15. The majority of the site consists of marsh soils made up of peaty muck (Pa). Most areas are wet or marshy most of the year, but often dry out during mid- summer. Glencoe silty clay loams (Gc) occur along the western most tip of the site, with small portions of Grays very fine sandy loams (GYC), Shorewood silty clay 'foams (SWB & SWC) and Minnetonka silty clay loams (Mt) are found along the north, east and southern perimeter. An island of LeSueur loam (LtB) occurs within the marsh area and will be the site of one of the wildlife blinds. For more specific locations, refer to the soils map. 16. Peaty muck dominates the central portions of the site. This area has a high water table and is wet or marshy much of the year. Nature trails will be located along the perimeter of the site on better soils leaving the peaty soils and vegetation essentially undisturbed in their natural state. 18. The Purgatory Creek enters the site on the northern edge and flows through the site exiting along the southern edge. The entire site is located within the 100 year floodplain. Winter construction combined with erosion control fabric should be adequate to protect the water and land related resources. 19. Natural drainage systems in the area will not be altered. The perimeter trail will be composed of woodchips on fiber mat and will require only minimal grading to smooth grass hummocks. A bituminous trail will eventually replace a mowed trail on the east side of the creek over an existing interceptor sewer. Clearing and grading has already been done during the installation of the sewer, so again only minimal work will be necessary. Two wildlife blinds are also to be installed. Careful site placement will be used to preserve the natural character and to minimize impact. Culverts will be installed as necessary to prevent obstructions to the natural drainage patterns. Further protective measures are described in Item 21 below. 21. Winter construction of the woodchip trail, while the ground is frozen, will essentially eliminate runoff. Disturbed areas will be seeded and mulched to mitigate erosion. Additionally, a filter fabric will be installed as necessary to prevent erosion sedimentation from escaping from the project site. 23. Winter construction of the nature trail will virtually eliminate dust. Construction related noise will result from normal site construction. This impact will be of a relatively short duration and mitigative measures include maintaining construction equipment in good operating order, proper mufflering of construction equipment and limiting work to City Hall business hours. The trail will be for pedestrians with the exception of the future asphalt section, which will also accommodate bicycles. The trail will be open during normal park hours. 25. Affect on fish, wildlife habitat and animal movement. No significant effect. 25a. The pathways or trails proposed in this project would only minimally affect wildlife habitat by removing only that vegetation that now stands where the trails will go. The human trails will aso be used by large mammals (ie. deer, raccoon, fox) when humans are not present (ie. after dark and most of winter). A substantial amount of brush cover exists throughout the conservation area and would provide more than sufficient cover for wildlife during heavy people use hours. With proper placement of culverts and use of porous aggregate trail materials, water movement should not restricted and the habitat should be unaffected. 25b. Care has been taken in the project plan to avoid sensitive plant communities (i.e. Showy Lady Slipper) by locating the trails away from these present colonies. 27c. The proposed trail system will not adversely affect the ecological balance of the conservation area as long as the trail is located away from sensitive plant communities, a minimum trail width is maintained and the materials used to construct the trail are PH neutral and allow for natural water drainage. Limestone gravel must not be used. r I( ems. . ,111‘ I I . HASSAN \1 v A \\ I Ali i..oNprn. t� \' GnNnMie Cameron 0Z'�+� .rne.Irn Pains , MYley T Ii irk J ' Jenne----jiff NEPlN r121114111 _ rSi r.c "A N.w M..�n. Mow` O U. _Mimi earn I 1 Y p ' w ^ , .7 —7 MN - n Mlnnn.Y ((y� �' L ` �y y Mon fella r • ` ,L-.P_ar lk w11...\J Tpn.L.enlhclw 7S - may' -r 1'' 1DO" • i+ 13..nw... y. o -1\ 1i1o1w-1cs _ . SI E HENNEPIN ��II I �, f 4 tin•rpr11 i COUNTY MAP a `� ,i o 11 1..non,te i — ra �► 4 . llirillr -•County Boundary Freeway or Expressway Municipal Boundary ---Proposed Interstate Freeway -^.--Township Boundary Arterial -^o-Water Body Exhibit A SOUTHWEST HENNEPIN COUNTY U; F.1 17%\ :... ai ....en • r. �. L.Y. 15 *pi ® •.• .}A ,,, el . 1 /.. ,iip �. see t y Park r. e...n. en -w.Yame r: ' - M,00 . • (Cr•Ya .. I I• i • 1 BYY a :."sS• iir B. Neel S 0' Mlnn• M V ; f!.:, .11:111- 41/i ,-,: viii p Lake M.nnMnwna /.. i 5 oi IIIYh// �/ _De�paven� pak.,,ZEMENgl*-\ • C.r•on . •� ■J ®=EL'el MeaOo.rereoYear Qt : .4.,, ,,121!ft Ai . � i� ./•.•n. . 0 Edina 161 02 near Gre nv• ••Y, ®'" e• EUOD /=�I b�� 5a. .ro ! "11=rii,��/}�-s'� °� \O\` 'L:V .. / X ,,,,,..; 1111..i id Y Cnn\Im. ilr� 1 e4• i. ' ' ,"::::", ' 0-0.. tool: ii...,,,,iAilit Z13:1 Lai. 1.- ... n..� 7anl .:c..a. a1 S Lal°•I „I o� •L.Ye�i' 1._ +. •�1, ►, Late tern • .,._L1, •.i i. <f _ r _ Ili Eden P airie . .`0 r earY., ! .art ,� ' � ' � � .r.,,a \_,_ .i:. _fi _ ` a, . �I]tom -- r... f� �,�4.yr y.S IfaM 1i .e'l' a.• • -,... :.;-,..-iti.uc-,- ,..-:- •••;.1, ..., -i:-.1,. ..,11 )10 00,)0 ia) Chanhassen en• L.. • O aLa.e I l�,f. ak• Park ."--"----'.' ( , i j -Y aS� ,/j.e( -Nic.7,3 ire 1 lo.e ... . lis e•a •5 qtYi •, -Tr-- `(. �.�- 1 � \ ilk,... .,10" •T ••, .r.. I /4- `J. lua a W. r1ma i .a ;'�:{1i:i•Y` � .• 1 i. ^ L... Fianna ` / i / ,1SCOTT co n •. •a Exh bit B USGS AREA MAP - N N,_.i. a ,..,\-.••DA•••••Ay.'..,',.„ 1., , '•i. •- ..1",,,?.', ell ---i :A. ii .:-.. 1'--- ... •,....• ,..,,. fo,. S,--N•••f',"•;- ( ' ' '•*---,.."2, - ''..'1-40,"•1•1 '• =1 o}-----,-.. ,.4. \- .•*,%%2 r•"\-'s 4.- - -'--•• ,..), ,,:.'1,rs•-•'.1.")5 -- -74-•z-••. „...., '7 1 ''t,cit,. 44 rofTroi4, - -/j. ."') - ' '--- - ..,;s1 :.;-,'/ . ..„..,_!, Cr3..-1:j;-' .„,..„.5,,,c4, - ,, ,2 ) _<- .,.<, :,,i, : - , 1..„.3.„ , , ."- ) • ., «ii -''' , •.- AIL 0_,F.18Witit*„44tV p.7,- 'T 5..'"' Sett ii h-''' ')!-t,V,. .., 1: 1 -," - ' C': ,,a,' --•,`,.zi.V--#:• r-- , ft_ 1.-- /: , ,../ _- i'sk ...::. • ,—,4 - __:11 irt I ye...--,,,- ilk-k.. ..- . .•...r..,,r c r4 ‘ -' ) ••i. (.1, ,,, vr',r,...v..„ ,,,,, ,..,\.f..•'' \VIN) ''`R.._.01:-•0' ,-I •,Q._'.T.C°."84 - _...7- t ...•-V., ',. ..,g4,:; ,..,...,- k i dr r'II,, \,:-.:'..,.I.,..,k ,1 e en _,_,•./,- -..,0 : L:-- —''' ...• \':,, r ih - .\ L'c' ‘.7 I' '' ,' \-z-.4.\ ..'1 '4 ' ''-'4,1%,i,• 1:.:-/ .4:p!1. • -,.... , . (... -, •• 0.- •,-- r, 0 •• )‘,i'i 1 t-=, '...."4. \' '•i--, IY,' ., . -, ,'-1-1 .-t,-...9.V a P: .--- • ' '- ' ' ' . r 0,' " • "." ' ., .• \<s. •.1../ , •1 '..A., • i .C...% . \ ,,,-,...•- *).:', 1 •-?i',\, .,‘f‘y:::),,4t I .."9, 'Ili-- "11 - - ' • • ' '- ,..4*-'3•6'1'•• •^. "i - • '. % iv %-:'' V.," -'0 '''' I '17 N- -‘:ra.-''''''",1 e(r -''' ‘ ...' ' ," ‘.-1,,, .• :'-• 2:.:C'- "' p4 "1:'•d l'. ‘.-.-' - .:A i 11 Ilk [ 690 .... .‘-,.;..T,..... -.-.- -..2-fTL.T--,----........11 _...,_ _.' -7' ,-.. ..40".--•-• '...- - ri o - me-,in 0, FEET''. •i /1,` _srv,/)27'i.:...,..•L.:"--.....-.").. V.‘\".y T - - --‘.., ',Tr .,/' 'Vyr • 'r •'1. (."'.23 •.1=2-.-"..7.TTC.•••,,_:. 'int.-Island;Z:-. _ 9 :.; ,,,,---.-_-- ?.k.flit,tr F? - c'e- ,s,d-,---c,,,,,,q.,, ' ' '''.-,? 7,/-, s„„: •J''!,. -''',..,'t. ' : . 7, j-) ...7.,;.„... ..„....>,,,,,,\A. ,\,,,----, ';,.,..c„ ...,-. ,-.. ,,,.. .4z,..., .-, j. f., 1,,,,c•f*A- ,,,,, ' -,,. : ,,-• . ,--1.'...7.: '.--::(4).7,2:„1"---": -- . .....:-.'''''''''''''::::.:** • ',,,.1/.N.,4 )1‘!--- f)'/;-)'1:"C.)-...''C''''1;- ;.\' ' -\' \'' • .40." \ ,''',, . --- ' . ,,_, •... .\:, ,.,%,,T.4kPieum_ \\...„) ., T. :5 •••-.. (.- \ .N..., s•-: - VN 4 - ----''74.7-771 T " . :'-;-) 3 - ‘ ---,I, _... ii . ' . •'7'• °•,,A rn ..‘••1 ''''. - ***_,_, ••••? 22; , ..,:7,\.1, '. . 1 •-•,,,, :• l'• -- -'/ '4 ,„:.. (1- .,,E•D ON.0P II.A R :•:• '4.1. --T ' : ,- _ ,,--, -•••,„, • - ...:•••'-:---. -- , ,s,,.., .6,•,., - .(3._ •,.,,v , g s'''. . •iT" :,...17;—", ry.-..., -. ,, . ,,. fuck , ,.: _-,,,iA ,,. '.•,',„,,,,‘„.,,..4,1'; ‘ ,C-‘,, Z.c.-7,,, +,,, .,. ..,_- li.,rj imiN....‘f...2..:,„•\,....-11 1- ,q,.., -',f:tl ,_''CV - . • co, __ . (‘- rfri - , t, mipi,* *'tt -..- • .,IT. •••••: C---',_/),‘ ‘ - ',' Al '. r T ''Kr\ •,}' iTie,..rir .; ..-Aql-:---, k,....'\' %ft\2...,111k'' ' 41aitl :,•1411'•ry.,-- sfrzi,, --- , r *.0 . Plt, ,. PO., •, F,,, C•t1 s,.41. (5 .•• .. .c"--"......' t - 52 30 ,........- ' efli.esW"'te'-'47-----,c ''•Iiiii-9/10'r7,-;\7'''''---7,7-. 1- , •' r, f--s.,, ' -,-""/ :'' •-,'--* i (Ir..' '2%1:\t` ,, ,,,,, , Gl;el Prt•,, .if i . . --- - ...:.. 4;`•='11: C__/7L_LL_ ...?Ai - - f ' \•-•\,. ,-,i), I) ,-,‘11 c'' 1 ( ;..-1 - _- • • \ Goi(Co me ' •':::,,,,,,„,"#,177-- s:' .., 1- (1.1... • -*/\:c ..\ il;', ) , I: •!.•.11.:M-, I..., - '_ - °S , sss, ,9 1( . ROQ ‘,.... ...,_..° -9/. ,-.„,s•---_-,--- 1. --- \ --• R.ti•nd,:1"--g----(/ ' "5 ;- ::\'_•__9.1- ....--'L.,•.-‘," il) ' --:-, ".,,.; ' 3o -".- . \ -ui, ---- -• , G0110.1,50 ...‘p) hP,,.-.4. s Lake.•ii' ."--. 0.., .:.;•i• "• , ., --:"i/ -.t , , ,, ,-_,. ' , -)1..._, 1 . ,,,,,,"/",_,g ,-., i•..,5-•-:`....:! ) . 17 , 1 .j , • . —fr-o-' "(kg-- .c- '•'•:-.--..1r-r.'''''--.*°I; - ' r'' 1/k. l_ _ ' - ':1_1• ., -0 t .1: _, ./_.,-.1- .-A: ....`° 0:- - \. ' 1:_•• L - .•-=:.-),-. ) 0 ; .4, - 0,,,i, --1 _ ( ' in ai," ,,%-* c\, _ •...'''' ii.-- , 4-' ( c/i ) ' ( Cith ,..., es• Prt's 1.,. ..0 M P ‘yTh— . J-. ..°//,)'i,i''' 'i )(6 'L` '''`V•i'(il(—: i ,i. v . - ' 'i •:'. • 4° a g ' I . . '-'r _ . 7:\s_...--,- ,----\,. ,! ,..4 ., a ,N.,:yr. /.I -ft '. ''-'--. -4-- •.' .4 -- ys\,-,',-,s , , 'A/i" :,..://h,; •,,'''if' ,dief T k : 1' . ("1.'''\ • ''''.''', \-"'..../;/. '•T L ii S 1/1•;.'1,1.,/. 49`Foll rti: .,--' .5 . n k ' -_-,.:!?:- y4,k'','\, (4• 7__.. 1 ,i.A:`,'i-)if•,),' @ ,(-:4,//.-\-.‘,";,,-,, i,, -.7"..(7:((•---N?tr-fl- ''• .i I '--—-6:341 "'""•. - .--, - ---- , USGS 7 1/2 minute<1-' i •' „.6 , 1 •_-•E'D.:- N P RAJ R I E-' _,'i,( \, ) \ .... ) r›,.. , „,,,t:_•;/', -I_ \ .-,---- -,,.-- • :. li; 3,,I..„ \ , _, / Exhibit C „, if r. . . Ablk __,..0,.;,,, ..,t1.-.0,0-(...,14•.. ',.,,-,0',11,'.1,, k, '',..:' -,:.” -6:? . ,-1,,*7'. .,.i1,45(.1,44,4e41:,•-;,A,--.. At i • t i.: ' • d ff;.11 i . ,, • M� We, k •._ Fie.•. ,..• kk ' '',5 Z' /?1,,,:'' .''\ll'ir.f.)114*.et;..7,;',. .:F-,..1''',1-11?..P..,4't.tA, 44. ,,, ,„ti,J.,25- ,26. k 14,4 . !....-- . • .4.4"/"4411!'sf:!44;1S.,e‘:' .' - '-. 7 .1t1414. i'1J \ ` .`-I VV 4,, 'N.,:' ' 'a:is'-77.Z.'i!,,. ,i,00 • -\ j: 44.011." -, L ...r (I ,, ',..,,..r c.....,s.,, Dir �1 "...It, •.i ` ° . , ..a *�`4n\ . ° �g �"�h' r Roc `�/ � � A. < •!`' ;. , 4..0.„,,,of ''-'4', . 4 tao,',41%, 1.4 q'64;r4f-4* .,i7 : tv1,` g-..-;-`P.'' 4,`'°- '7 t--- • —' t0 ''.. — lsa �'.< • ',,' •0...r. _ b t •�'.. 'tea•,. 1 k• '( g ` g`—} °! v ./. „, . A 1.*•:. 4P t . }i1 X `k { 4 Nd *," C, - SI". . . ,ate,, I r fi :. • J/ If.3 1ppp.. r� f J ': R C; 1 r `1 {.,. S, 1 14'•' 'rip' en''.'"'`fir r't '.. x .r t1/4... s,i A. 'R� 1.: lit N r' `/ tr*".!`l}V. •Ya fo i'. „- c'--"*�,�.,+ ✓ r ii* ;f.tr ti.Kla ,� r r c>f<S 1f, •�� �'•:li ��� �11J,�lt' FFFWW��,'. �'�t a �'`r^11��.g�e �; '. ��''. {p., 01 • ra\ 40 T Z !.....'.....! 1 •: :: w r ',• w ,, .'' y �viTy V: 'f;•.•i ` ir.+"`" -- SOILS MAP Exhibit D ZONING MAP l -r ®�� - ----- AI'NW 4. 'YId c,' 11t- �t'• 4''iV - Yeµ+1 4. D. ' 3 Y, Y ` - ' 5'--- 1''!.._ � + 4-, ..i `ii `. fit° i t.z'q � VAS 1 .j T--,---" . 4;4. F.c----,Liii4.4. 11=.1,'"/;:4't \..'s, -.;;,-,,c,-°-_,.-•,n. .43 "'.1.-31 "':. ,,,B '1111114 1._ ' \ ; uPJ FFF.., l a+3� ! mill 58 • I A gel p - i at3 l [ R$ 1au Y .- , � •t L.,, --- ;u"' ACT 1► 0 .p.��c�li L i 103-41 i ? '�y� '- �4 n.M`ecgrara, ♦ 42 ,. ,.ter . 812 s ;: j o' v I rvy a. 5 7 f �R�iwz 7 _ r �� 3 wY s }1y�4{ - ii� ([�'^• q1.((.//7 5�f; �' / ll i9T CO ✓' 1 •` rR.di 27a l. ice- _ t.r 93 38 Iri Tr...,,-;..� _.-i,, C , • ,C,'R 0� A<G-i[R v! Y 1.. "y ,, ', 1 i s�uF a' �i �.1�gi 1�, L iT • 14, ' ::• 'T\.( �. �122 i15 7 .. 1 1,�� - ,� 1M5 2 N 2 / r•. .— ..... 1 _\` 4 tt 26 32 / Jr'I�V 3 ,,, 1 5 YRR I S F 1 \ I FP lam' ] \ t / f, LJ tl � -'I )1 7/C r•C�! 29 �t RM...ti / t _' _.FPY' .` _is ru.z t ( j p . r%. • .•• �:pp� FP Flood Plaln J. wy a+ 2t.5 - `, ,trI\ .1 a. v Exhibit E 1 . / NC . .. . .;........., ,. , 1 .2,-, lur ,... ,, --1,.„7--if?2 ' 0. .•. : • . . ..i, I ! - ';',44 : tiPy01:".1.7" .._, ':• %It 4kI-.1. i.e..' •::, 4. .- • / .::•-- '':.•.*...,.....:,/ lif,•'::,:•VA ,'"---. ), / ' I ill S.t•-: .4 , • \\ri„.,11. 2.).g.:(! . ..r...)......: '1,2......1 ' ,..„,_I •: :: ( -., ,,.:' -- r'...;Or ;',c :',7,cce. .. -,. i...: '‘;Mti •1- i \ "--,;,-.\' c •r:•••; -..1.••-• -••• A.A.- AMMO 4•:" -' : ,t.i.t. , :_:Nt,il,...'..1..0. "rt. ....:IA•,‘ . .:.l'N•i Vt.,„.74 ...1 ' VP ••\ , ', .,101 ,r,•,,,, 11.4 1,,,.' -.!:*:•:j. ‘, p ,..-J-- 7 , ' ! 4. :.I. ••,, 7.1.':_..,l•1 I ,,,,,,, ` v:114. •; ' "'!.1...' ,,1 s K, ..M. -- :,___-_-„, .4.4., ...,: .•/ \ N., •""),, boo_ ,, - , ',. ; NE -:•"i'vis. . • • p, \ , / . --.)/(.1, , 1. Ir ,. • , '- kf:',Trz.v r"1 p• * .. - ',...5=-:7.-L'sr-, 1 s' '.10,/r-- - ;, , , .,,,,,-, %. ,.... . r. ... 1151-'' ',----,..1 •' - re ,f....'.: . - - ....: .. 1 -• i r k ;0' Imp .i ‘"- ,4-' • 141:- -..4., I' .. . , ;''''' I 7-' ••..... . , „.:.- ' ., / ... , 1.no•'' . ,_ , • ft,„.., , ...' i r; '''',2--,..I 4 • r / . . .). --.4E7,,... . _....---- .. . ."...,./ , ,..,.___....... ..." ..4.-....i.. "--, ,. . 1.‘•It......,1..:sisv_. IN. ....„/„..... , • . ,,-i ` .. ,L. s...., I ...-. ' mu^‘,. .. ‘..... , NW '',.' ../ 444,L ' : \ „„,,,, ,,, 1 \ „ , _ EDEN PRAIRIE GUIDE PLAN 1982 t..,11.1..pi.. GRAPHIC Pf Mal,. 4,11.11.1.6% ---- MUSS LINE o 0 ..AIIIIIIIIIIh, NOR,' .... ,... ..........,.,,, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 1 7 .., i • +F I MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services DATE: October 9, 1987 SUBJECT: Request for Authorization to Hire Appraiser for Riley Lake Park Acquisition. The City of Eden Prairie has been informed that the grant application for acquisition and development of Riley Lake Park expansion ties for first in preliminary ranking for State bonded fund grants for 1988. The final application will be submitted on October 30, and the City should receive final approval in December of 1987. The State has authorized the City to hire an appraiser for the acquisition portion of this grant. This appraiser must be selected from the approved list of appraisers provided by the State of Minnesota. Staff requests authorization to hire an appraiser for this project. Fifty percent of the cost of the appraisal will be covered from the grant and 50% from cash park fees. The State grant is in the amount of $490,000 for acquisition and development and is a 50% matching grant; however, the State will not match over 50% of the appraised value. 8L:md AT COUNCIL FOR 2ND READING FOUNTAIN PLACE. by GSM Corporation's:,Znd Reading of Ordinan a #4O.874PUD-9=84. Rezoning-And-Planned Unit Development District Review from Rural to PUD-9-87-RM-2.5; Approval of Developer's Agreeinent;' for Fountain Place; and Adoption of Resolution #87-281, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #40-87-PUD-9-87, and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 52 acres into 4 lots, 1 outlot, and road right-of-way for a 490- unit apartment project. Location: West of Highway #169, north of Columbine Road. • (Ordinance #40-87-PUD-9-87, Rezoning and PUD District; Resolution #87-281, Authorizing Summary and Publication) • Fountain Place CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 40-87-PUD-9-87 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 9-87- RM-2.5 District (hereinafter "PUD 9-87-RM-2.5"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of October 20, 1987, entered into between CSM Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement") and that certain supplement to the Developer's Agreement, dated as of October 20, 1987, entered into between Lloyd and Joan Cherne, husband and wife, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Supplement"). The Developer's Agreement and Supplement contain the terms and conditions of PUD 9-87- RM-2.5, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD 9-87-RM-2.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD 9-87-RM-2.5 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code, which are contained in PUD 9-87-RM-2.5, are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD 9-37-RM-2.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is, removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 9-87-RM-2.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph 8, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 4th day of August, 1987, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 20th day of October, 1987. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary 0. Peterson, Mayor PU8LISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of . Emitscr A October 13, 1987 DESCRIPTION PREPARED FOR Breuer 6 Associates 7901 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 REs Area in Section 15-116-22 to be rezoned to High Density Residential DESCRIPTION: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 15,Township 116,Range 22, Hennepin County,Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 01 degrees 56 minutes 51 seconds hest along the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 748.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 13 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 245.01 feet; thence South 11 degrees 56 minutes 51 seconds East a distance of 290.00 feet; thence South 31 degrees 31 minutes 37 seconds East a distance of 61.09 feet; thence North 3 degrees 15 minutes 58 seconds West a distance of 66.56 feet; thence North 10 degrees 49 minutes 15 seconds East a distance of 294.18 feet; thence South 79 degrees 46 minutes 57 seconds East a distance of 232.41 feet; thence South 9 degrees 18 minutes 34 seconds West a distance of 106.71 feet; thence North 79 degrees 11 minutes 12 seconds East a distance of 116.73 feet; thence South 87 degrees 00 minutes 08 seconds East a distance of It6.28 feet; thence North 01 degrees 56 minutes 51 seconds hest a distance of 89.00 feet; thence North 09 degrees 20 minutes 37 seconds East a distance of 135.11 feet; thence South 3 degrees 56 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 115.16 feet; thence North 89 degrees 03 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 15.00 feet; thence North 00 degrees 56 minutes 51 seconds West a distance of 108.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 03 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 263.10 feet; thence South 75 degrees 28 minutes 08 seconds East a distance of 67.45 feet; thence Mouth 19 degrees 03 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 57.24 feet to a point on the east lint of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 553.57 feet southerly of the northeast corner; thence southerly along said east lint a distance of 989.99 feet; thence South 48 degrees 12 minutes 43 seconds West a distance of 78.16 feet; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 461.33 feet a central angle of 13 degrees 24 minutes 34 seconds an arc length of 117.74 feet; thence South 61 degrees 37 minutes 17 seconds West tangent to said curve a distance of 144.61 feet; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 450.10 feet a central angle of 18 degrees 43 minutes 39 seconds an arc length of 147.09 feet to the south line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence westerly along said mils line to the point of beginning. Containing square feet DESCRIPTION PREPARED BY Ronald A. Swanson, Land Surveyor Minnesota license Number 10183 Az October 13, 1987 • DESCRIPTION PREPARED FOR Brauer d Associates 7901 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 RE: Area in Section 14-116-22 to be rezoned to High Density Residential DESCRIPTIOf: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Secton 14,Township ad, Range 22, Hennepin Coonty,Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 1 degree 03 minutes 43 seconds East along the west line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 553.57 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North d4 degrees 35 minutes 21 seconds East 24.15 feet; thence North 11 degrees 28 minutes 01 seconds East a distance of 11.44 feet; thence North 13 degrees 00 minutes ID seconds West a distance of 53.16 feet; thence North II degrees 54 minutes 13 seconds East a distance of 38.95 feet; thence North 44 degrees 5d minutes 17 seconds East a distance of 228.00 feet; thence North 67 degrees 57 minutes 49 seconds East a distance of 43.4d feet; thence North 44 degrees 56 minutes 17 seconds East a distance of 121.11 feet; thence North 84 degrees 58 minutes 06 seconds East a distance of 65.30 feet; thence South 45 degrees 03 minutes 43 seconds East a distance of 65.01 feet; thence South 33 degrees 17 minutes 37 seconds East a distance of 49.03 feet; thence South 63 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds East a distance of d2.36 feet; thence North 59 degrees 26 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 59.91 feet; thence South 77 degrees 20 minutes 39 seconds East a distance of 60.39 feet; thence northerly along a nontangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 543.41 feet a central angle of 9 degrees 48 minutes 20 seconds a chord bearing of North 6 degrees 21 minutes 53 seconds East a chord length of 92.89 feet; thence North 1 degree 27 minutes 43 seconds East a distance of 197.71 feet to the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 87 degrees 42 minutes 43 seconds East along said north tine a distance of 70.1d feet to a point distant 708.08 feet easterly of the northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South I degree 27 minutes 43 seconds West a distance mi 202.29 feet; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve concave to the west having a central angle of 46 degrees 45 minutes 0D seconds, a radius of 613.41 feet an arc length of 511.51 feet; thence South 48 degrees 12 minutes 43 seconds West tangent to said curve a distance of 125.01 feet; thence southeasterly along a tangential curve concave to the east haying a radius of 51.10 feet a central angle of 91 degrees OD minutes 0D seconds am arc length of 78.54 feet; thence South 41 degrees 47 minutes 17 seconds East tangent to said curve a distance of 12.00 feet; thence southeasterly along a tangential curve concave Io the east having a radius of 114.00 feet a central angle of 25 degrees 30 minotes 00 seconds an arc length of 50.74 feet; thence Sooth 67 degrees 17 minutes 17 seconds East tangent to said curve a distance of 53.00 feet; thence southeasterly along a tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 214.00 feet a central angle of 28 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds an arc length of 106.45 feet; thence South 38 degrees 47 minutes 17 seconds East tangent to said curve a distance of 89.3d feet more or less to the northwesterly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 169 and 212; thence South 49 degrees 13 minutes 04 seconds West along said right-of-way line a distance of 100.06 feet; thence North 38 degrees 47 minutes 17 seconds West a distance of 92.85 feet; thence northwesterly along a tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 114.00 feet a central angle of 28 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds an arc length of 56.71 feet; thence North 67 degrees 17 minutes 17 seconds West tangent to A-3• Area in Section 14-116-22 to be rezoned to High Density Residential (CDHTINUED) said cure a distance of 53.00 feet; thence northwesterly along a tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 214.01 feet a central angle of 25 degrees 38 ninnies 10 seconds an arc length of 95.24 feet; thence southwesterly along a reverse curve concave to the south having a radius of 48.00 feet a central angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 01 seconds an arc length of 75.40 feet; thence South 48 degrees 12 minutes 43 seconds West tangent to said cure a distance of 192.00 feet; thence South 54 degrees 51 minutes 59 seconds West a distance of 120.81 feet; thence South 48 degrees 12 minutes 43 seconds West a distance of 6.84 feet to a point on the west line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Onarter; thence northerly along said west line a distance of 489.99 feet to the point of beginning. Containing square feet DESCRIPTIQi PREPARED BY Ronald A.Swanson,land Surveyor Minnesota license tbnber 10183 • Q41. { June 26, 1987 OSCRIPTIO4 PREPARED FOR Braver&Associates 7981 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 RE: Westerly portion of public zoning to be rezoned High Density Residential DESCR1PT1Dis That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 15,Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County,Minneosta described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 418.01 feet north of the southwest corner; thence North RI degrees 56 minutes 51 seconds West along said west line a distance of 338.08 feet; thence North 09 degrees 03 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 245.00 feet; thence South OR degrees 56 minutes 51 seconds East a distance of 290.00 feet; thence South 17 degrees 56 minutes SI seconds East a distance of 12.00 feet; thence South 60 degrees 47 minutes 37 seconds West a distance of 97.57 feet; thence South 88 degrees 03 minutes 09 seconds West a distance of 157.00 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 80,946 square feet DESCRIPT104 PREPARED BY Ronald A. Swanson,Land Surveyor Minnesota license Number 11183 iI S June 26, 1907 DESCRIPT12(PREPARED FOR Braver 6 Associates 7901 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 REz Easterly portion of public zoning to be rezoned High Density Residential DESCRIPTIQfz That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 15,Township 116,Range 22, Hennepin County,Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 553.57 feet south of the northeast corner; thence South 1 degree 03 minutes 43 seconds • East along said east line a distance of 62.00 feet; thence South 43 degrees 56 minutes 17 seconds West a distance of 60.00 feet; thence South 11 degrees 56 minutes 17 seconds West 310.80 feet; thence North 68 degrees 17 minutes 21 seconds lest a distance of 207.42 feet; thence North 00 degrees 56 minutes 51 seconds West a distance of 89.01 feet; thence North 89 degrees 20 minutes 37 seconds East a distance of 135.00 feel; thence South 3 degrees 56 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 115.16 feet; thence North 89 degrees 03 ninetes 09 seconds East a distance of 15.01 feet; thence North 00 degrees 56 minutes 51 seconds West a distance of 100.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 03 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 263.00 feet; thence South 75 degrees 20 minutes 08 seconds East a distance of 67.45 feet; thence North 09 degrees 03 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 57.24 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 68,498 square feet DESCRIPT12f PREPARED BY Ronald A. Swanson,Land Surveyor Ninneosta License Number 10183 AG October 13, 1987 DESCRIPT1Q1 PREPARED FOR Brauer 6 Associates 7901 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 RE: Middle portion of public zoning to be rezoned High Density Residential DESCRIPTION: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 15,Township 116,Range 22, Hennepin County,Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence • North lit degrees 56 minutes 51 seconds West along the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 410.00 feet; thence North 88 degrees 03 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 157.00 feet; thence North 68 degrees 47 minutes 37 seconds East a distance of 97.57 feet; thence South 17 degrees 56 minutes 51 seconds East a distance of 43.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 03 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 15.00 feet; thence North 9 degres 03 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 61.00 feet to the point of beginning of the tand to be described; thence North 3 degrees 05 minutes 58 seconds West a distance of 66.56 feet; thence North 10 degrees 49 minutes 15 seconds East a distance of 294.18 feet;thence South 79 degrees 46 minutes 57 seconds East a distance of 232.40 feet;thence South 9 degrees 18 minutes 34 seconds West a distance of 106.71 feet; thence South 73 degrees 22 minutes 47 seconds West a distance of 196.53 feet; thence South 26 degrees 05 minutes 31 seconds West a distance of 170.90 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 43,837 square feet • DESCRIPTIIDI PREPARED BY Ronald A. Swanson,land Surueror Minnesota License Number 10183 0 5:'.9 g'ti v,^N{5'a 3�'i"i c4_' a w e,, 13 ti 4 o0E:e og 3i azwsr wa6 v. N°t„1G' vZi-a1oa moo g as 0°^Vai�73:fma x� 5 ' j9 V • 1, • Fountain Place DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1987, by CSM Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Regional Commercial to High Density Residential on 6.86 acres, and from Public Open Space to High Density Residential on 4.5 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept on approximately 52 acres, overlying Planned Unit Development District Review, PUD 9-87 including variances, and Zoning District Change from Rural to PUD-9-87-RM-2.5 on 29.3 acres, Preliminary Plat of 52 acres into four lots, one outlot, and road right-of-way, and Environmental Assessment Worksheet Review for construction of a 490-unit apartment complex, said 52 acres all situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #40-87-PUD- 9-87, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: 1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the materials revised and dated July 24, 1987, reviewed and approved by the City Council on August 18, 1987, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein. 2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. Prior to release by the City of the final plat, or concurrent with, and as'part of, the final plat for the property, Developer agrees to dedicate to the City a twenty-foot (20') wide public walkway easement over the private trail as explained in Item #12., below. Developer agrees to dedicate said property free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, and mortgages. 4. Prior to release by the City of the final plat, Developer agrees to execute a Special Assessment Agreement for Developer's share of the cost of construction of Columbine Road and related improvements thereto. The cost of construction of Columbine Road and related improvements shall be as determined through the feasibility study in preparation by the City as of the date first written above. The study will show that a uniform front-foot rate will be utilized for assessment purposes for all lands being assessed. City agrees that, should the City's schedule for construction not meet Developer's schedule for occupancy, or rental, of the development on the property, and in lieu of assessment for the same improvements listed above, Developer shall have the right to undertake construction of Fountain Place (the internal connecting road with Highway #159) and Columbine Road (from the south boundary of the property up to and including the intersection of Columbine Road with Fountain Place) all as depicted in Exhibit 6, attached hereto, under the the following conditions: A. City's schedule for construction of said roads does not meet Developer's schedule for occupancy, or rental, of the development on the property. 6. City has not reached the point of awarding the bid(s) for construction of the improvements for said roads. C. Developer agrees to reimburse City for the cost of preparation of plans and specifications for the improvements for said roads. 5. Prior to release by the City of the final plat, Developer agrees to submit to the Building Department, and to obtain the approval of the Building Department of detailed plans for the retaining walls indicated on the grading plan in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said plans shall include details with respect to the height, type of materials, and method of construction to be used for said retaining walls. Upon approval by the Building Department, Developer agrees to construct those improvements listed in the plans as stated above, as approved by the Building Department, concurrent with grading and street construction on the property and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 6. Developer shall notify the City and the Watershed District 46 hours prior to any grading, tree removal, or tree cutting on the property. 7. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, Developer shall submit to j the Director of Planning and receive the Director's approval of a j tree • inventory of those trees within 25 ft. outside of the '. construction area, which are not planned to be removed by j construction on the property as approved by City, indicating the size, type, and location of all trees twelve (12) inches in diameter, or greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground level. A. Developer agrees to implement erosion control measures and adequate protective measures for areas where trees are to be preserved and areas where grading is not to occur, and to receive City approval of said measures. Developer agrees that said protective measures shall include, but not be limited to the following: 1) Grading shall be confined to that area of the property within the construction limits. 2) Snow fencing shall be placed at the construction limits within the treed areas of the property prior to any grading upon the property. The snow fencing shall be installed prior to grading on the property and shall remain on the property in the City- approved locations. Said snowfencing shall remain on the property, including on each of the individual lots, until such time es City authorizes removal of the snowfencing on a lot by lot basis. 3) City shall perform an on-site inspection of said protective measures on the property by the City. Developer shall contact City for said inspection. Developer agrees that defects in materials and workmanship in the implementation of said measures shall then be determined by the City. 4) Defects in materials or workmanship, if any, shall be corrected by Developer. Developer agrees to call City for reinspection of the implementation measures, and to receive approval by the City prior to issuance of the grading permit by the City. Approval of materials and workmanship may be subject to such conditions as the City may impose at the time of acceptance. B. If any such trees are removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction area, Developer agrees that prior to issuance of any building permit for the property, Developer shall: 1) Submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's-approval of a reforestation plan for all trees removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction area. Said plan shall indicate that the trees shall be replaced by similar tree species and that the trees used for reforestation shall be no less than three inches in diameter. The amount of trees to be replaced shall be determined by the Director of Planning, using a square inch per square inch basis, according to the area of the circle created by a cross sectional cut through the diameter of a tree as measured 4.5 feet above the ground. 2) Prepare and submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of a written estimate of the costs of the reforestation work to be completed. 3) Submit a bond, or letter of credit, guaranteeing completion of all reforestation work as approved by the Director of Planning. Developer agrees that the amount of the bond, or letter of credit, shall be 150% of the approved estimated cost of implementation of all reforestation work and shall be in such form and contain such other provisions and terms as may be required by the Director of Planning. C. Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall implement those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the Director of Planning. 8. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, and erosion control for the property. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 9. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property, Developer agrees to submit to the Director of Planning, and to obtain the Director's approval of exterior building materials for the structures on the property, including color(s) and texture(s) of materials to be used. Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer agrees to construct the improvements listed above, as approved by the Director of Planning, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 10. Developer agrees that lighting fixtures for lighting of the parking lots and driveway lighting shall be installed at no greater than 20 j ft. in height, with downcast, cut-off luminars, in order to avoid lighting off the property. } 11. Developer agrees that signage for the property, including the monument sign proposed for the intersection of Columbine Road and the road extension to the west, as depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto, and including all directional signage for the property, shall meet City Code requirements. 12. Developer agrees that, concurrent with street construction, Developer shall construct the following sidewalks and trails in accordance with City standards and requirements: A. An eight-foot wide bituminous trail in the location of the private walkway east of Building #4., as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said trail shall extend from the public sidewalk along the street, then north to the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area. B. An eight-foot wide bituminous trail along one side and a five-foot wide, five-inch thick concrete sidewalk along the other side of Columbine Road, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. 13. City hereby grants the following variances to City Code requirements within the RM-2.5 District through the Planned Unit Development District Review for the property and incorporates said variances as part of PUD 9-B7: A. Building height is allowed to be greater than 30 ft., up to 54 ft. B. Exterior finish for the structures to allow for 38% of the exterior materials to be wood, varying from the maximum amount of such materials allowed by City Code of 25%. The remaining 62% of the structures shall be brick, stone, glass, or better material. Fountain Place OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN CSM CORPORATION AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1987, by and between Lloyd and Joan Cherne, husband and wife, hereinafter referred to as "Owners," and the City of Eden Prairie, hereinafter referred to as "City:" For and in consideration of, and to induce, City to adopt Ordinance #40-87- PUD-9-87 changing the zoning of the property owned by Owners from the Rural District to the PUD-9-87-RM-2.5 District, as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of , 1987, by and between CSM Corporation and City, Owners agree with the City as follows: 1. If CSM Corporation fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owners shall not oppose the rezoning of the property back to Rural. 2. This Owner'sSupplement Agreement to the Developer's Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owners, their successors, heirs, and assigns of the property. 3. If the Owners transfer such property, owners shall obtain an agreement from the transferree requiring that such transferee agree to the terms of the Developer's Agreement. CITY • Gary D. Peterson, Mayor Carl J. Jullie, City Manager 3 Fountain Place CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 87-281 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE 40-87-PUD-9-87 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 40-87-PUD-9-B7 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 20th day of October, 1987; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 40-87-PUD-9-87, which 1 is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that a said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 40-B7-PUD-9-87 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on October 20, 1987. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Fountain Place CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 40-87-PUO-9-87 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located north of Columbine Road, west of Highway #169 from the Rural District to the PUD-9-87-RM-2.5 ' District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1987. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)