HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 09/15/1987TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 1987
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia
Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to
the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director
John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris
Enger, Director of Community Services
Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works
Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary
Jan Nelson
Page 2338
Page 2362
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
PROCLAMATION FOR OBSERVANCE OF EDEN PRAIRIE "DAY OF PEACE"
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY AUGUST 4 1987 (Continued
from September 1, 1987 --
8. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY AUGUST 18 1987
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Request from Robert Bjorkland, President of New Concept Homes, for
naming of Park Page 2385
Page 2386
Page 2250
Page 2384
Page 2337
C. Final Plat approval for Eden Pointe (south of County Road #1
and east of Homeward Hills Road) Resolution No. 87-2g --
D. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 47-87 amending City Code Section
2.18 which regulates the terms for the Historical & CTITEUFil
Commission
E. Receive petition for street and utility improvements within
Columbine Road right-of-way and authorize preparation of a
Feasibility Study, I.C. 52-130 (Resolution No. 87-261)
F. ESPECIALLY FOR CHILDREN. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No.
38-87-PUD-8-87, PUD District Review and Zoning District
Amendment within the Neighborhood Commercial District; Approval
of Developer's Agreement for Especially for Children; and
Adoption of Resolution No. 87-247, Authorizing Summary of
Ordinance No. 37-87-PUD-8-87, and Ordering Publication of Said
Summary. 1.29 acres for construction of a day care facility.
Location: South of Townline Road, east of Dell Road.
(Ordinance No. 38-87-PUD-8-87, PUD District and Zoning District
Amendment; Resolution No. 87-247, Authorizing Summary and
Publication)
Page 2389
Page 2391
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,September 15, 1987
G. Receive 100% petition for street and utility improvements for
Wyndham Crest Addition and authorize preparation of plans and
specifications, I.C. 52:TY9 (Resolution No. 87-25§T
Page 2397
H. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 48-87, renaming Appaloosa Lane to
Tree Farm Road
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. ROGER'S BODY SHOP, INC., by Roger L. Lindeman. Request for Zoning Page 2264
District Change from Rural to 1-2 on 1.68 acres with variances to be
reviewed by the Board of Appeals, and Preliminary Plat of 1.91 acres
into one lot and road right-of-way for construction of an auto body
shop. Location: Highway #169 across from the Hennepin County
Vocational Technical School. (Ordinance #44-87, Rezoning;
Resolution #87-249, Preliminary Plat) Continued from September
1, 1987
B. BLUESTEM HILLS 4TH ADDITION, by Brown Land Company. Request for Page 2280 Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 15.94 acres, Planned Unit
Development District Review on 15.94 acres with variances, Zoning
District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 10.57 acres with Shoreland
variance to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Zoning District
Amendment within the R1-13.5 District on 5.36 acres, and Preliminary
Plat of 15.94 acres into 27 single family lots, 3 outlots, and road
right-of-way. Location: West of Bennett Place and Bluestem Lane.
(Resolution #87-250, PUD Concept; Ordinance #45-87-PUD-11-87, PUD
District and Zoning District Change; Resolution #87-251, Preliminary
Plat) Continued from September 1, 1987
C. FALL 1987 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING (Continued from September 8,
1987) Resolution No. 87-254
D. Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements over part of Lots 1 and
3, Block 1, Prairie View Center (located north of Highway No. 5 Page 2403 and east of Prairie Center Drive) Resolution No. 87-258
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
VII. PETITIONS REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request from Beijing II Inc.
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
IX. APPOINTMENTS
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Set Special City Council meeting for Tuesday, September 21,
T-9117 7:30 PM to consider the City Budget
B. Report of City Manager
1. Award Contract for construction of Fire Stations (Continued
from September 1, 1987)
Page 2404A
Page 2405
Page 2400
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,September 15, 1987
2. Scheduling for Strategic Planning Page 2406
C. Report of City Attorney
D. Report of Director of Planning
E. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Request from Stan Tekiela Page 2407
2. Request to approve plans and specifications and to authorize Page 2412 advertisement for bids for Community Center partiil repair
F. Report of Director of Public Works
XI. NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
ITT
Engineering
Land Surveying
Landscape Architecture
Planning Non _ Erma'
I lac.
8080 Wallace Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
(612) 934-4242
September 15, 1987
Mr. Carl Julie
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
RE: Rogers Body Shop
Dear Mt. Julie:
On behalf of Roger Limieman, I would like to ask for a continuance of his
body shop proposal at the City Council tonight.
We would like to have anAdditiCOSIAW6-44Meks to finalize negotiations with the two neighbors to the south of this project regarding the assessments for
the proposed road and utilities.
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Brown
Bluestem Hills
David W. Brown
Wayne E. Brown
Brown Land Company
(612).934.0338
(612).944• 3360
10200 Wild Duck Pass. Eden Prairie, Minnesota•55344
September 15, 1987
Mr. Chris Eager
City Planner
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Re: Bluestem Hills 4th Addition
Eden Prairie. MN
Dear Mr. Eager:
As we discussed today, we would like to request a 60 day extension to the City Council's
consideration of the prelimary plat for the above referenced project. This extension
would give us more time to study the project, and look for ways to address the City
staffs concerns.
In the interim, we would like to proceed with the final plat for the eastern seven lots
as shown on the attached sketch. This area has previously had preliminary plat
approval under Bluestem Hills 1st Addition, and these seven lots will not be
substantially different form the approved prelimary plat.
If you have any questions, please call.
jitiT t
Wayne Brown
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
City Manager Carl Jullie
Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson
Award of Bids for Fire Stations Construction
September 15, 1987
On May 6, 1986, Eden Prairie residents authorized issuance of $2.3 million in
general obligation bonds for improvements to the City's firefighting system.
These improvements contemplated construction of a new Fire Station No. 4 (at
Homeward Hills and Sunnybrook Roads), expansion and remodeling of Fire Stations
Nos. 2 and 3 (at Technology/Flying Cloud Drives and Valley View/Eden Prairie
Roads, respectively); and addition of five new pieces of fire apparatus,
including two pumpers, two heavy rescue squads, and one ladder truck. A
contribution of up to $250,000 from the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC)
was expected toward the construction of Fire Station No. 4.
Fire Station Bids: Bids for work on the fire stations were opened on August 11.
Five bids were submitted, but two were invalid because they arrived after the
time for the bid opening. The bids are tabulated below:
Del's Merrimac Trucker
Construction Construction Construction
Fire Station No. 4 $ 769,500 $ 912,122 $ 970,400
Fire Stations Nos.2&3 979,500 1,159,037 1,032 200
Total 1,749,000 2,071,159 2,002,600
Less Deductions 66,924 58,247 50,800
Net Bid 1,682,076 2,012,912 1,951,800
Architects'
Estimate
$ 615,000
683,000
1,298,000
These bids are significantly above the amounts calculated for the bond issue. A
variety of things evidently contributed to the high bids. The architect, in
reviewing the bids, determined that the bulk of the increase came from a
multitude of items in the few-hundred-dollars-here, a-thousand-dollars-or-two-
there variety. It also appears that the construction market hit a surprisingly
higher cost cycle; Minnetonka also received higher-than-expected bids for a fire
station on the following day. Many subcontractors apparently believed they were
already filled up with work. In further review, the architect and firefighters
have identified numerous items which could be changed and result in further
deductions in the range of $100,000 to $120,000. If such a change order were
successfully executed, the resultant contract amount would be approximately
$1,585,000. However, $100,000 should be added for construction contingencies.
Costs of the Station and Equipment Improvements:
The costs of improvements now stand as follows:
$1,785,000
$ 160,000
$1,300,000
$3,245,000
250,000
Fire Station Construction & Contingency
Architect and bond Issuance Fees
Fire Equipment
less MAC contribution (1/3 construction &
architect fees for Station 4)
less Bond Proceeds
$2,995,000
$2,300,000
$ 695,000
-2-
If one were to assume execution of a change order for the deductions already
identified, the difference would be reduced to approximately $585,000.
Bids were opened on September 14 for four of the five pieces of fire equipment.
Prices received indicate that the City's estimate of cost is on target.
Alternatives:
Several alternatives are readily apparent:
1) Reduce the scope of construction;
2) Reduce the number of pieces of equipment;
3) Issue additional debt (upwards of $600,000 in fire
equipment certificates);
4) Identify a new response system;
5) Reject the bids;
6) Some combination of the above.
I. Reducing Scope of Construction - Staff and the architect believe that the
building programs have been reduced as far as possible without damaging
the integrity of the structures and of the competitive bidding process.
Counsel advises that further changes should necessitate rebidding of the
work.
2. Reduce Equipment. During the referendum, the City represented that it
needed more and modern equipment to serve existing and foreseeable
development. Equipment was the City's priority need, and station improve-
ments were necessary in part to house the fire and emergency response
fleet. The equipment would also provide a better response to emergencies
expected at Flying Cloud Airport, and thus became the basis for MAC's
willingness to participate financially in the construction of Station No.
4. No reductions in the number of pieces of equipment should be made.
3. Issue Additional Debt: To implement the total fire response improvement
prograil—(wiaTiTation revisions), Council would need to authorize
approximately $600,000 additional debt to be issued. Fire equipment
certificates may be issued having maturities within five years, and may
be issued in any dollar amount (they need not relate to specific pieces
of equipment). The mill levy impact of such an issue would depend on
the structure of maturity dates; estimated levies should fall in the
0.3 - 0.45 mills range. Staff does not believe issuing certificates in
the $600,000-range is financially prudent.
4. Identify a New Response System: Staff has studied alternatives for the
use of the Tolir stations. We recommend the following program:
*Construct Station No. 4, and remodel and expand Station No. 3
(Valley View & Eden Prairie Roads). These stations would
become what the firefighters are calling "superstations" which,
along with the main station at Highway 5 and Mitchell Road,
would be ones from which general responses would be called. This
- 3 -
arrangement would provide more flexibility in initial response as
well as more efficient back-up response. Equipment could also be
more effectively allocated among Stations No. I, 3, and 4.
*Forgo remodeling Station No. 2 (Technology Drive/U.S. Hwy. 169).
Hennepin County paramedic units would be moved from the main
station, and in so doing would free up space for fire equipment
and firefighters. Paramedic response to the western part of
the City would be adequate from Hennepin paramedics stationed
in southwestern Minnetonka. Station No. 2 would be used for
specialized responses. Several pieces of equipment would
still be housed in Station No. 2: more specialized apparatus
for industrial incidents for northeastern Eden Prairie; equipment
undergoing maintenance and repair; and seasonal response units
(e.g., boats for water rescue). Remodeling and expansion of
Station No. 2 can be delayed until greater need is apparent.
*The location of the stations, the array of equipment, and the
firefighter response patterns will not diminish the fire
insurance rating as determined by the Insurance Service
Organization (ISO).
5. Reject the Bids:
To accomplish Alernative No. 4, Council will need to reject the bids. The
bids were structured as a package, and as such the City could not accept
bids on a station-by-station basis. At this time, it appears that
rebidding will reduce construction costs in the range of $300,000 -
$350,000. The anticipated timeframe for work would be to award the
construction contract in November, begin work by December 1, and have
Station No. 4 completed by July 1988 and Station No. 3 by November 1988.
This schedule would add winter construction costs which, depending on the
severity of the winter, result in up to $75,000 additional outlay.
6. Combination of Approaches:
As can be seen, three of the alternatives should be used. First, the
opportunity to implement a new response system which promises several
operational efficiencies should be followed. Construction should proceed
on Stations Nos. 3 and 4, and be delayed indefinitely on Station No. 2.
Second, Council should reject all bids, and authorize preparation of
revised plans and specifications and advertisement for bids. Third, under
the new plan, issuance of fire equipment certificates in the $300,000
range is feasible. This amount is about one-half of the total which would
be required if the bids on the table and the overall fire response system
originally envisioned were to be adhered to.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council reject all bids and adopt Alternative No. 6.
CWD:jdp
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-262
RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING EDEN PRAIRIE DAY OF PEACE
WHEREAS, people throughout the world seek and desire peace; and
WHEREAS, several churches in the community are sponsoring the
second annual Eden Prairie Day of Peace; and
WHEREAS, this Day of Peace will be observed on Sunday, September
20 at the Staring Lake Park pavilion;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Eden Prairie proclaim September 20, 1987 as Eden Prairie Day of
Peace, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that residents of the City be encouraged
to observe the Day of Peace through this community event or in their
own meaningful way.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on
September 15, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
City Council Minutes 1 August 4, 1987
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 4, 1987
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
7:30 P.M., CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia
Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City
Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger
Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of
Community Services Robert Lambert, Director of
Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording
Secretary Linda Jacobson
ROLL CALL: All members were present.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following items were added to the Agenda: X. A. 1. Pidcod( - Discussion on
budget process; X. A. 2. Peterson - Schedule workshop to go through
Emergency Operating Plan and Code; X. A. 3. Harris - 1-494 Corridor
Workshop; X. A. 4. Anderson - Report on storm damage to the City; Xl. Jullie -
School Board meeting for August 18, 1987 at 5:30 p.m.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Agenda and
Other Items of Business, as amended and published. Motion approved 5-0-0.
II. MINUTES
A. Regular City Council Meeting_beki Tuesday. July 21. 1987
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the July 21,
1987 City Council Minutes. Motion approved 5-0-0.
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
City Council Minutes 2 August 4, 1987
B. Award contract for grading at Eden Lake School. Willow Park and
Homeward.1±1112arli
C. Final Plat approval for Thomoson Addition (south of Valley View Road,
east of County Road 4) Resolution No. 87-214
D. Final Plat approval for Edenvale Executive Center Four (south of Valley
View Road, east of Executive Drive) Resolution No. 87-215
E. Final Plat approval for Mount Curve Addition (east of W. 168th Avenue,
south of North Manor Road) Resolution No. 87-216
F. Final Plat approval for Mount Curve Addition (south of Mount Curve
Road, east of Franlo Road) Resolution No. 87-217
G. Resolution reauesting MWCC sewer connection permit for The Ridge 3rd
Addition (Resolution No. 87-218)
H. JAY WALLACE ADDITION, by Jay Wallace. 2nd Reading of Ordinance
#26-87, Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.23 acres; Approval of
Developer's Agreement for Jay Wallace Addition; and Adoption of
Resolution #87-180, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #26-87 and
Ordering Publication of Said Summary. Location: East of Franlo Road,
north of Laurel Drive. (Ordinance #26-87, Rezoning; Resolution
#87-180, Authorizing Summary and Publication)
I. MAJESTIC OAKS by All-Land Corporation. 2nd Reading of Ordinance
#33-87, Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5 acres; Approval of
Developer's Agreement for Majestic Oaks Addition; and Adoption of
Resolution #87-219, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #33-87 and
Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 5 acres into 12 single family lots.
Location: East of West 168th Avenue, south of Manor Road. (Ordinance
#33-87, Rezoning; Resolution #87-219, Authorizing Summary and
Publication)
J. TIMBER CREEK NORTH, by Timber Creek North Partnership. 2nd
Reading of Ordinance #34-87-PUD-6-87, Planned Unit Development
District Review on 89 acres with Zoning District Change from Rural to
RM-6.5 on 14.9 acres, and from Rural to R1-13.5 on 44 acres with
variances; Approval of Developers Agreement for Timber Creek North;
and Adoption of Resolution #87-220, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance
City Council Minutes 3 August 4, 1987
#34-87-PUD-6-87, and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 89
acres into 110 lots, 3 outiots, and road right-of-way. Location: South of
County Road #67, west of Creek View Lane, north of Purgatory Creek.
(Ordinance #34-87-PUD-6-87, Rezoning and PUD District; Resolution
#87-220, Authorizing Summary; and Publication)
K. MOUNT CURVE ADDITION, by Mount Curve Developers. 2nd Reading
of Ordinance #35-87, Rezoning from RM-6.5 to R1-13.5 on 2.24 acres;
Approval of Developer's Agreement for Mount Curve Addition; and
Adoption of Resolution #87-221, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance
#35-87, and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 2.88 acres into 5
single family residential lots. Location: Southwest corner of Franlo Road
and Mount Curve Road. (Ordinance #35-87, Rezoning; Resolution
#87-221, Authorizing Summary and Publication)
L. EDENVALE EXECUTIVE CENTER 11 by Equitable Life Assurance
Society. 2nd Reading of Ordinance #36-87-PUD-7-87, Planned Unit
Development District Review on 15.5 acres with Zoning District Change
from Rural to 1-2 on 15.5 acres with variances; Approval of Developer's
Agreement for Edenvale Executive Center II; and Adoption of Resolution
#87-222, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #36-87-PUD-7-87 and
Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 15.5 acres into one lot for
construction of 172,900 square feet of industrial uses in three buildings.
Location: South of Valley View Road between Equitable Drive and
Executive Drive. (Ordinance #36-87-PUD-7-87, PUD District and
Rezoning; Resolution #87-222, Authorizing Summary and Publication)
M. Adoption of Joint Powers Aareement with Hennepin County for CDBG
Funds (Resolution #87-223, Adoption of Joint Powers Agreement)
Bentley asks City Manager Jullie if Item B awarding a contract should be
on the Consent Calendar. Jullie responded, "yes". Bentley asked If a roll
call vote was needed for this item. Jullie said it's not necessary since this
is not a public improvement contract that requires the typical forwarding
process.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve Items A - M on
the Consent Calendar. Motion approved 5-0-0.
City Council Minutes 4 August 4, 1987
Iv. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. WYNDHAM CREST by Burl Corporation. Request for zoning District
Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 19.9 acres, Preliminary Plat of 27.9
acres into 25 single family lots, one outlot, and road right-of-way.
Location: West of Purgatory Creek, east of Tristram Way. (Ordinance
#37-87, Rezoning; Resolution #87-224, Preliminary Plat)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been
published and property owners within the project vicinity had been
notified.
Don Patton, representing proponent, addressed the proposal.
Robert Bjorklund, President of New Concept Homes, was available for
questions.
Planning Director Enger said the Planning Commission reviewed this
item at the June 22nd Planning Commission meeting and the
Commission continued this to July 27th asking proponent to provide a
complete tree inventory. Enger said there are 5,000 caliper inches of
hardwood trees on the entire site that are 12 inches or greater in size.
Enger said the Planning Commission recommended approval on a 5 - 0
vote subject to changes recommended in Staff report of July 24th.
Enger said approximately 30 percent of trees on site are being removed
and under the City's tree replacement formula proponent would replace
approximately 5 percent of these trees.
Enger referred to Staff report of July 24th under "Staff
Recommendations" 1. A. and said the current policy requires 250 percent
bond; that this is a stronger effort to assure the developer installs the
trees and not the City.
Enger referred to Staff Report of July 24th under "Staff
Recommendations" 1. B. C. D. E. F. Enger mentioned Item F. Enger said
that the proposed development falls within the conservancy area of the
Purgatory Creek Study and that it's not possible to develop on the
property without being within this area of the Purgatory Creek Study.
That it makes preservation of floodplains and trees adjacent to the
floodplain all that more important.
City Council Minutes 5 August 4, 1987
Enger referred to Item G under "Staff Recommendations" from Staff
Report of July 24th and Staff suggests the developer bond for trees in
questionable areas and then through the developer's and builder's
efforts every tree that was saved would be given credit against the
projected number of trees.
Enger referred to Item 2, 3 and 4 of the Staff Report under "Staff
Recommendations." Enger said the majority of trees that are
represented as being saved perhaps can be saved by the use of
retaining walls prior to construction on individual lots and Staff
recommends that retaining walls that are saving those large treed areas
be constructed with street construction.
Enger referred to retaining walls and Staff is making changes in
recommendations and recommends retaining walls not be over four feet
high; that drainage be diverted around them, not over them; that retaining
wall details be reviewed by the Engineering and Building Department
and building permits be issued so they are structurally designed
correctly.
Enger mentioned that the Park, Recreational and Resource Commission
has not reviewed this item and said there are a couple of Park and
Recreational issues. Enger said the Park and Recreational staff
comments are reflected in the Planning Commission Staff Report.
Enger referred to the letter from Mr. Robert Bjorklund dated
August 3, 1987 and a July 31, 1987 letter from the Builders Association
of Minnesota. Enger pointed out that the Builders Association of
Minnesota letter came subsequent to review by the Planning
Commission and the Park and Recreation Commission and those
commissions were not aware a potential review by the Builders
Association was being requested.
Enger referred to the Builders Association letter of July 31, 1987 and
stated the most impact to the City's current tree replacement policy is the
idea that trees would not have to be replaced that were removed from
city road right-of-way. Enger said Staff made suggestion to change
alignment of the roads for this project because the roads go through the
major quality treed areas and through the main topographic features on
the site.
Enger pointed out the tree replacement policy has been revised a
City Council Minutes 6 August 4, 1987
number of times in the past several months; and that Staff has been
working with builder and City to settle objections to the satisfaction of
both parties. Enger mentioned when there is more than one builder in a
development it's difficult to keep track of how the project is graded and
that's it's a difficult type of land use to manage, particularly in treed areas.
In very wooded areas other land uses are perhaps more appropriate.
Enger said this developer is asking for approval subject to any changes
coming from the Minnesota Builders Association. Enger went on to
mention exactly what the tree replacement policy does and does not do.
Enger said in this case the developer is removing 30 percent of the trees
which calculates to five percent of the woods replaced.
Enger talked about not having enough open space to put trees back in
and said the developer will create open space by developing the lots
and, secondly, when the developer has a difficult time finding places to
replace trees on the site it indicates how many trees are being removed.
Enger said the Planning Commission, understanding developer was in
concurrence with tree replacement policy, recommended approval on a
5-0 vote.
Bentley asked what Patton meant by other alternatives to meet tree
replacement goals. Patton said when the sewer line was put through the
site most of the trees were taken out, and he referred on the map to this
area. Patton said in designing the site they came up with a lot of
alternatives and referred to the map how they came up with the present
design. Bentley asked Patton again what other alternatives Patton was
referring to and he asked for something more specific rather than the
words "other alternatives", wanted to know what Patton proposed as an
alternative. Patton referred to the importance of setting a dollar amount
per caliper inch for the trees rather than have bonding up front.
Bentley referred to Mr. Bjorklund's letter of August 3, 1987 and asked if it
was Patton's position that Wyndham Crest be approved subject to any
restrictions of City tree replacement policy and bonding requirements.
Patton agreed and said he would like this to be included with any
changes.
Bentley asked City Attorney Pauly if it's wise to approve a project subject
to possible revisions in Code at a future date. Pauly said it would not be
a wise action because it would leave the issue open for a period of time.
City Council Minutes 7 August 4, 1987
Pauly stated if there was a reexamination soon prior to final plat or
issuing building permits, then it might be equitable to consider approval.
Pauly stated from a legal point of view if Council approves and no
changes are made, then the tree policy stands as presently exists and
the developer will enter an agreement to abide by that policy. Only if
Council takes some future action would there be modification
accordingly to the policy. Patton said that was acceptable.
Peterson asked Enger if it's reasonable that Staff will review the tree
replacement policy, forward recommendations to Council, get response
from Council, before the first building permit is issued. Enger said Staff
expects that it would be. Peterson mentioned that one alternative to this
issue would be to continue the hearing until the policy is changed or
simply adhere to policy.
Anderson said he walked this parcel of property this afternoon and went
on to explain the area in question and the different variety of trees in this
parcel of land. Anderson questioned the area, where the roads go, the
lot size, and is concerned about protecting this area for the future.
Anderson said he would like to see a different plan; would like to see a
preservation of as many trees as possible in this area; and would like to
see larger lot size.
Pidcock said she would like to continue this hearing if there's any
change in the tree policy. Anderson mentioned the fact that it did not get
to the Park Commission and would not want to vote on the issue until he
had a recommendation from the Park Commission. Harris said she
prefers to work within the frame work of existing policy or defer decision
until we have decided what that policy is.
Bentley asked Enger if Staff is recommending any changes in policy and
Enger said they just received the letter yesterday and Staff could be
recommending some changes. Bentley asked Enger if there was a
proposal format before Council that would recommend change in that
proposal and Enger said there wasn't. Bentley said he was concerned
about holding up approval over a possible change in policy that isn't
even officially in progress and said he would be opposed to a
continuance or denial. Bentley mentioned he has concern over
proceeding prior to Park and Recreation Commission review.
Harris said she's not comfortable unless acting within existing frame
work of policies already in place. Harris mentioned the fact there was
City Council Minutes 8 August 4, 1987
some flexibility within the existing policy. Harris asked the developer if
he was comfortable and willing to work within existing policy and Patton
said the developer was.
Mr. Richard Feerick, representing the sellers, said it's in the best interest
of the sellers to continue the sale within the time frame if possible.
Feerick also mentioned he's a member of the Minnesota Builders
Association and said the Association has the same interest as Council to
protect trees and effectively develop the site.
Robert Bjorklund, President of New Concept Homes, said he talked to
the Builders Association and their intention is to look at different
alternatives with respect to the bonding, increasing the tree policy of the
City by asking for one or two trees be placed on every subdivision that
had no trees, and more consideration for credit in tree line of the
roadway. The Builders Association reassured Bjorklund they're trying to
help because of small builders. Bjorklund said he reinforced what
Feerick said.
Peterson asked if it's been negotiated on the bonding from 250 percent
to 150 percent. Enger said it's already in the specific recommendation of
the Timber Creek project that Council approved previously.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to Close the Public
Hearing and Approve 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 37-87 for Rezoning.
Anderson mentioned concern that this area is next to a nature park and
changes have been made in the plans since the entrance to the parkway
was first drawn in and there are 126 homes that have little or no access
to one of the largest park areas. Anderson said he's concerned that the
Park and Recreation Commission is not aware of some of the changes
here and said he hasn't had a chance to talk to the Community Services
Director. Anderson said without the information from Lambert he can not
make a wise decision and will not vote for the motion.
Peterson asked Enger if the Park and Recreation Commission will review
this prior to 2nd Reading and Enger said they would. Peterson asked if
the motion were amended to say "Approved subject to the approval of
the Park and Recreation Commission or successful negotiation between
Park and Recreation and the proponent with final approval," would that
be acceptable with Anderson.
City Council Minutes 9 August 4, 1987
Pauly recommended not make it subject to approval of the Park and
Recreation Commission, but make it subject to imposing conditions.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris, to amend the motion on
the floor by adding that the 2nd Reading of the Rezoning Ordinance
would occur after review of the development proposal by the Parks,
Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission.
Pauly stated that what Bentley suggested was fine, subject to review by
the Park and Recreation Commission, but added that the motion be
subject to the Council's acceptance or rejection of recommendations by
the Park and Recreation Commission.
Bentley said he would amend the motion to contain Pauly's language as
stated above. Harris accepted that amendment.
VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT: Amendment carried 5-0-0.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to Adopt Resolution No.
87-224 approving the Preliminary Plat of Wyndham Crest for Burl
Corporation, 2nd Reading subject to review by the Park and Recreation Commission and subject to Council's acceptance or rejection of
recommendations by the Park and Recreation Commission. Motion
approved 4-1-0 with Anderson opposing.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to Direct Staff to prepare
a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff
recommendations and Council conditions.
Anderson mentioned concerns about developing a forested area and the
number of trees that will be taken out and said there are other
alternatives. Anderson mentioned Council has the ability to preserve
more trees in the Code and doesn't feel Council has taken the
opportunity to preserve more trees. Peterson mentioned the tree
replacement policy and also mentioned he doesn't want Council
redesigning proposals. Anderson said Council can do better and
referred to having an R1-44 in the development.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion approved 4-1-0 with Anderson
opposing.
B. ESPECIALLY FOR CHILDREN Request for Planned Unit Development
City Council Minutes 10 August 4, 1987
District Review on 50.2 acres with variances, with Site Plan Review
within the Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District on 1.29 acres for
construction of a daycare facility. Location: South of Townline Road,
east of Deli Road. (Ordinance #38-87-PUD-8-87, Rezoning within
PUD/Neighborhood Commercial District)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been
published and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Ed Kodet, representing the proponent, introduced Priscilla Williams.
Priscilla Williams, President of Especially for Children, addressed what
the company does.
Anderson asked Williams what age the children will be and Williams said
16 months to 5 years, and may have school age children if there's a
need in the community. Anderson mentioned there was a big demand
for infant care in the City and Williams said this fall she's opening an
infant care center at North Memorial Hospital which will be the centers
first infant care program. Williams said she didn't want to commit to infant
care at the Eden Prairie facility until the trial run with North Memorial to
see how the center works out. Williams also mentioned the center will be
designed to build in infant care facilities.
Harris said she's comfortable with 16 months to 5 years and the current
plan for North Memorial Hospital. Pidcock said that it bothered her that
daycare centers were always next to gas stations and wanted to know if
a study had been done on the affect of car and gasoline fumes on
children at these centers next to gas stations. Williams said none of her
facilities happen to be next to gas stations and said their playground
would be behind the building so there would be a buffer for the
playground area.
Harris asked how many centers Williams has and Williams said they
have eight different facilities all in the Minneapolis area and suburbs.
Harris asked Williams how long she had been in the business and
Williams said 11 and a half years.
Ed Kodet, representing the proponent, addressed the proposal.
Director of Planning Enger said this item was reviewed by the Planning
City Council Minutes 11 August 4, 1987
Commission on July 13th, 1987. Enger mentioned that the site plan
review was required with original approval of the PUD and necessary to
gain the requested zoning. The idea of a site plan review was to tie this
building into the existing Tom Thumb center. The Planning Commission
recommended approval on a 6-0 vote subject to recommendations of the
Staff report of July 10th.
Bentley asked if the issue of rooftop mechanical has been addressed by
the Planning Commission and Kodet said the proponent is not going to
have any rooftop mechanical.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to Close the Public
Hearing. Motion approved 5-0-0.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pldcock, to Approve the 1st
Reading of Ordinance No. 38-87-PUD-8-87 for Rezoning within the PUD.
Motion approved 5-0-0.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to Direct Staff to
prepare a Development Agreement and incorporating Commission and
Staff recommendations. Motion approved 5-0-0.
C. EDENBROOK, by David Noel. Request for Zoning District Change from
Rural to R1-13.5 on 6.2 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board
of Appeals and Preliminary Plat of 6.2 acres into 13 single family lots,
one outlot, and road right-of-way. Location: South of Townline Road,
east of Purgatory Creek, west of Woodlawn Heights Addition. (Ordinance
#39-87, Rezoning; Resolution #87-226, Preliminary Plat)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been
published and property owners within the project vicinity had been
notified.
Dave Hoel, representing the proponent, addressed the proposal.
Planning Director Enger said this item was reviewed by the Planning
Commission on July 13th, 1987 and the Planning Commission
recommended approval of the 13 lot subdivision with one lot as
floodplain to be dedicated to the City on a 6-0-0 vote subject to Staff
report recommendations of July 10th, 1987. Enger stated the Planning
Commission's recommendations are as follows: One, prior to City
Council review proponent should revise the plans to reflect a five-foot
City Council Minutes 12 August 4, 1987
wide concrete sidewalk along the west side of Edenbrook Drive; revise
the plans to reflect extension of Edenbrook Drive and water line to the
southern property line; revise the plans to reflect evergreen plantings
along the proposed berm for noise abatement measures for the northern
lots when Crosstown comes through. Two, prior to 2nd Reading a joint
powers agreement between the City of Eden Prairie and the City of
Minnetonka be signed for the extension of the sanitary sewer line.
Three, prior to final plat detailed storm water plans and utility plans be
reviewed by the City Engineering Department and provide right-of-way in
the final plat for County Road 62 as required by Hennepin County; apply
for and receive variance for lot size, subject lots Block 1, Lots 4 - 6,
adjacent to the floodpiain.
The Park and Recreation Commission suggested that an outiot be
created in the lot adjacent to the floodplain and be considered for lot size
variance. Enger said Staff supports approval of the variances. Four,
prior to grading permit issuance developer would be responsible for
installing a construction barrier at grading limits; a park fee would be
applicable to this project and place a temporary dead end sign and
temporary cul-de-sac sign at the end of Edenbrook Drive. Five, prior to
final plat proponent dedicate Outiot A which is floodplain for the City for
conservation purposes. Enger said the western portion of this property is
within the conservancy area of the Purgatory Creek study and proponent
is proposing to dedicate floodplain to the City and the Planning
Commission recommends approval.
Peterson asked Enger if there's reasonable access to the east as this is
developed. Enger said that the Edenbrook property is surrounded by
undeveloped property to the east, south and west; Staff has looked at a
plan which would provide cul-de-sac access to the undeveloped
property to the east because the developed land further to the east is at a much higher elevation. Enger said the property to the east is not wide
enough by itself to put a cul-de-sac in on a north/south alignment and
obtain lots on both sides. Enger said Mr. Markham is the property owner
to the east and Mr. Uram with the planning staff talked with Mr. Markham
about the proposed plan the Council has before them prior to the
Planning Commission meeting. Enger said Mr. Markham did not
comment on the plan at that time and Staff received no comments at the
Planning Commission meeting
Peterson mentioned the evergreen use as a buffer along the north side
of the property and wondered about the durability of evergreens with salt
City Council Minutes 13 August 4, 1987
spray when the Crosstown is extended. Asked if the trees are far enough
away or will they die out. Enger said his recollection is the evergreens
are on the site now and would have to look at the variety of evergreen
and distance to answer the question. Noel said they're spruce trees on
the property and planning a six foot high berm. Enger said a wood fence
in combination with the trees might be a solution.
Anderson asked Enger if there's any possibility to put a moratorium on
anymore Edens or Prairies for street names. Enger said Council is in
control of both street names and names of subdivisions and has the
authority to accept or reject the names.
Rick Sather, representing Mr. Markham, talked about Mr. Markham's
property and showed Council pictures of different plans for the property
and discussed Mr. Markham's point of view.
Peterson reminded Sather that Council is dealing with the issue of the
proposal and to confine comments to the impact of this proposal on the
Markham land. Sather said he has no problem with the Noels
developing the land but thinks the project could be planned differently to
benefit all parties. Sather said he wished Council would defer action on
the preliminary plat and allow time to work together or condition the
preliminary plat approval on Noel and Markham trying to work together to
find a middle ground to access the two pieces of land.
Peterson said they are not preventing any other property owner from
reasonable access. If Mr. Noel voluntarily suggests removing this item
from the docket for a couple weeks, there is really nothing Council can
do except encourage future discussion.
Harris asked if Sather had contacted Noel prior to this evening and
Sather said he met with Noel on August 4th and talked about alternative
access, but stated there was not resolution.
Dick Feerick, working with Bob Bjorklund and New Concept Homes,
discussed the different ideas he had for the property.
Bentley said the idea of the preliminary plat and final plat allows for
discussion process to continue and mentioned the action Council takes
this evening will not preclude continuing discussion with the Hoeis
relative to what's going to happen to this parcel.
City Council Minutes 14 August 4, 1987
Peterson mentioned the fact that it's Hoe l's project, that he's gone
through the planning stage, now there's a road block; and wanted to
know what Hoel thought. Hoel said he'd like to go through with the work
the way he planned it. Hoel said he's open to working with the
surrounding property owner as far as he can and said he's willing to
change the way the road comes off their property to align with Markham's
property. Hoel requested the plan be approved.
Paul Nordbye, 17541 Rustic Hills Drive, talked about the proposal
coming in at the last minute showing a connection to his road which Park
and Recreation said was suppose to have been a cul-de-sac. Said he
has nothing against the area being developed but wished the
neighborhood adjoining the property could have input to where roads
go.
Bentley said the project under consideration is on the board and not the
pictures on the overhead and that there is no proposal pending relative
to development on the overhead pictures. Bentley said they're only
talking about potential of future development and making allowances
within this project to accommodate that potential.
Bentley mentioned the dead end that Nordbye referred to, and said that it
would stay that way, and that the Council at that time specifically
indicated it was a temporary dead end and ultimately be connected to a
road.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to Close the Public
Hearing and Approve 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 39-87 for Rezoning.
Bentley asked Dietz how the Markham property would be served by
sewer and water. Director of Public Works, Mr. Dietz, said Staff
recommended the connection point for the sewer be to the west in
Minnetonka which has a deeper sanitary sewer location. Bentley asked
about this proposal and if Staff is recommending allowances that would
allow for expansion of the system. Dietz said the eight inch pipe will
handle the proposed development to the south and east and when it's
connected in Minnetonka the line would run in at minimum grade to go
as far as it can by gravity sewer.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion approved 5-0-0.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to Adopt Resolution No.
City Council Minutes 15 August 4, 1987
87-226 approving the Preliminary Plat of Edenbrook for David Hoel; and
Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating
Commission and Staff recommendations and Council conditions.
Peterson said there should be a Council recommendation that the Hoels
and the Markhams have continued negotiation.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion approved 5-0-0.
D. REFUNDING OF PRESERVE PLACE MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING BONDS
JN THE AMOUNT OF $3.850.000 (Resolution No. 87-228)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been
published in the Eden Prairie New on July 15,1987 and that the
proponents and Mr. Frane are here to address any questions the Council
may have.
Alan Bernick, representing the proponent, addressed the proposal.
Pidcock asked Bernick to explain the credit enhancement device.
Bernick said the project will be built using the bond proceeds. Pidcock
asked the 3.85 million or the 4.3 million. Bernick said the original cost of
the project was to be approximately 5.3 million and the developer is
financing the difference between total cost of the project and what the
bonds finance. Pidcock asked if the indebtedness of the holder is still 5.3
million so they have a greater equity stake in the apartment. Bernick
agreed with that statement.
Bentley asked if the bond sale was public or private. Bernick said the
sale was called escrow where the bonds were issued in order to
preserve a grandfather tax treatment under old tax laws held privately
until now. Bentley asked who is taking advantage of arbitrage earnings
since issuance of the bonds; Bernick replied that arbitrage earnings were
limited due to the terms of the City's conditions in the agreement for
issuance of the bonds in 1985. Bernick listed some of the limited costs
to which arbitrage earnings could be used.
City Attorney Pauly mentioned the final form of the resolution has been
modified on page five, paragraph five, the City's approval of the form of
Preliminary Official Statement to simply 'Consent" and also fifth line from
the bottom of page five change "approves" to "consent".
City Council Minutes 16 August 4, 1987
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris, to Close the Public
Hearing and Adopt Resolution No. 87-228. Motion approved 5-0-0.
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Payment of
Claims Nos. 36293 to 36568.
Peterson questioned item 36358 and Jullie stated there are automatic dialers on
the lift stations. When the lift stations malfunction the flow would creep up in the
manhole and tip a switch which sends a signal which leads to a telephone
exchange and automatically dials maintenance personnel.
Peterson also questioned item 36403, does the City pay the $1,200 through the
Human Rights Service Commission. Jullie said, "yes" and that's a budgeted
item.
Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Harris, Pidcock, Peterson voted "aye". Motion
approved 5-0-0.
IV. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. Refunding of Quail Ridge Multi-Family Housing Bonds in the amount of
$5.565.000 (Resolution No. 87-227)
City Manager Jullie stated the trustees for the $5.56 million housing
bonds for Quail Ridge are seeking a change in bond agreements
regarding insurance mechanism for the bonds. The trustee proposes a
Letter of Credit for $500,000 to be substituted for the prior mortgage
insurance instrument and Staff agrees with this approach.
Peterson asked if Frane felt $500,00 Letter of Credit was an adequate
amount and Frans agreed that it was and said it would give the
equivalent of ten percent equity in the project.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to move Resolution No.
87-227. Motion approved 5-0-0.
VII. PETITIONS. REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Naggale__Chitdoor Advertising C_ornoany reouest for billboards
City Council Minutes 17 August 4, 1987
City Manager Jullie referred Council to Naegele Outdoor Advertising's
proposal regarding the City Code, per City Attorney Pauly, to provide for
changes in location of billboards and also referred Council to Staff
report.
Michael Cronin, representing the proponents, addressed the proposal.
Director of Planning Enger stated that Zoning Administrator Jean
Johnson was present and she has worked most closely withe Cronin in
preparation of the Staff report and she would be happy to summarize the
report.
Harris asked how the City can have so many non-conforming signs.
Johnson stated a lot of signs go back 15, 20 years, well before City Staff
monitored the signs. Harris asked about the recent billboards in '86 and
'84 and wondered what recourse there was for Council when signs are
in. Johnson said in '84 the City entered into an agreement for removal,
but the signs had been in place prior to this.
City Attorney Pauly stated that a number of signs are non-conforming
because the signs existed prior to adoption of the prohibition against
signs other than in certain designated zones and said in the 1970's there
was no regulation of signs in the City. Pauly said in the '70's a sign zone
was adopted and some of these signs are outside those zones, so since
they were in use prior to the adoption of sign zones they continue as a
non-conforming use.
Bentley asked Cronin if he's correct in the assumption that Cronin wants
Council's opinion on the proposal identified as Graph 3. Cronin said
he's requesting that Council direct Staff to place Naegele Graph 3 into
ordinance form or the City's proposal into ordinance form. Cronin said
he could go along with Staff proposal since the only major difference is a
few locations on Highway 5.
Peterson said it's premature for Council to adopt or give strong support
for either proposal at this point since it hasn't been through the
commissions yet and stated the task tonight is to get a sensing of the
Council on this proposal.
Bentley mentioned there are two areas to look at, one, take no action this
evening because ultimately the signs will disappear, according to Jean
Johnson, and there would be no signs. Two, is Council going to allow
City Council Minutes 18 August 4, 1987
signs in Eden Prairie.
Anderson said Council has to find out if there's an advantage to having
signs, are they important to the City. He said there are three alternatives,
"none, some or a lot".
Peterson said the use of billboards is a legitimate and important
business and the City has a right and responsibility to carefully manage
outdoor advertising. Place billboards where they are not offensive,
where it is not obstructive to scenery. Peterson said it serves a very
positive function in the proper locations in enhancing a commercial
atmosphere in a commercial area.
Anderson agreed to billboards if they give direction, but to have
wholesale signs advertising liquor and cigarettes he sees no value to a
community. Anderson mentioned the fact driving down a road you see
the billboards and you're exposed to what they advertise whether you
want to be or not.
Pidcock mentioned the sign situation in Edina and thought it interesting
that all the businesses survive in that area without signs. Pidcock said
her conclusion is she would like to see Eden Prairie without any signs.
Harris said it's difficult to address the issue in terms of having legitimacy
for meeting the needs of the community. The Council needs to look at
legitimacy in terms of the resident and driving public community, and not
at the business community alone. Harris said she leans towards
Pidcock's sentiments, but if the City elects to have signage within its
perimeters Council should look very carefully where signage is placed.
Bentley said he doesn't want to enter into discussion about content of
signs. Bentley also talked about the billboards along the river bottoms.
Bentley said it's an advantage to the City to have some signs in the
community and it's advantageous to the community to work out a trade to
get those signs out of the river bottom area. Bentley said he would
encourage Naegele to proceed and ask Staff to proceed along Staff
recommendation instead of draft three. Bentley said the size and height
might be a little much but something scaled down from the level would
be appropriate.
Pidcock said that if Council approves sign locations, then the signs
would be present forever. Peterson said that among the alternatives
City Council Minutes 19 August 4, 1987
from the discussions between Staff and Naegele would be the
elimination of signs in some undesirable locations.
Peterson said he doesn't want to be a part of any governmental structure
that participates in the demise of legitimate business. Pidcock said she's
not trying to put anybody out of business, but is entitled to see a
countryside as it is without being forced to look at signs. Peterson
disagreed with Pidcock and said signs should be put in areas where the
City will accept them.
Anderson talked about the legitimate business of the landfill as a
comparison to billboards and Peterson said you have to respect the law
that protects the landfill.
Pidcock mentioned that advertisers could use other means for
advertising besides billboards and Bentley mentioned that a number of
businesses sole advertising dollar goes for outdoor advertising because
it's the most cost effective way to advertise. Bentley said Staff is
suggesting a total of eight signs throughout the community and said that
would be appropriate because they would be in certain types of zones.
Mitch Wonson, 14007, Holly Road, wants Council to eliminate all
billboards entirely from the community. Is upset that Council is
entertaining a proposal by Naegele when Naegele hasn't fulfilled their
current obligations and agreements with the City.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, that City Council reaffirm
the existing policy and require conformance by Naegele to existing
agreements for removal of some billboards and request removal of
certain other billboards which do not conform to City or State regulations
and wait to see how the State Department of Transportation
condemnation case is decided.
Peterson asked if that means the elimination of present signs and no
provision for future signs and Pidcock said "yes". Anderson said he goes
along with the motion. Peterson said he strongly opposes the motion.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion approved 3-2-0 with Peterson and
Bentley opposing.
City Council Minutes 20 August 4, 1987
VIII. BEPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
A fteauest from Bicentennial of the U.S. Constitution Committee
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the name of
Constitution Avenue for the access road to Round Lake.
Peterson asked Mark Weber the meaning of naming that particular street
Constitution Avenue. Weber said they had other alternatives but in every
case it involved changing existing addresses. Anderson asked Weber if
it could be something else other than a street and Weber said they aren't
stuck on the street idea but it was another way to observe the
bicentennial.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion approved 5-0-0.
IX. APPOINTMENTS
There were none.
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS. BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Pidcock - Discussion to schedule workshop on City audit report
Pidcock said she would like to schedule a meeting to go over the audit
report from Fox, Cum & Murphy. Harris mentioned before any type
of meeting is set she would like to have the City Manager address issues
raised by the auditors in form of a plan which would become the basis of
a talking document for such a meeting. Discussion followed as to when
the meeting would be held.
2. Peterson - Discussion to schedule meeting to go over the City Code
and Emergency Operating Procedure Manual
Peterson said after the "storm weekend" it became apparent there were
inconsistencies between the Code and the Emergency Operating
Procedure Manual and suggested a work session to discuss this.
Discussion followed as to when the meeting would be held.
City Council Minutes 21 August 4, 1987
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley, to schedule a meeting
to go over the City Code and Emergency Operating Procedure Manual
inconsistencies on September 15th at 4:00 o'clock p.m. Motion
approved 5-0-0.
3. Harris -1-494 Corridor Workshop
Harris said she would not be able to attend the 1-494 Corridor Workshop
and asked if there would be any recording of the workshop for review at a later date. Peterson said there will be minutes and that he will be there
also and will shareinformation with Harris afterwards.
4. Pidcock - AMM Breakfast Meeting
Pidcock mentioned there will be an AMM Breakfast Meeting on the 13th
of August at 7:30 a.m. and everybody should try and come.
5. Anderson - Schedule time to go through storm damage in the City
Anderson mentioned that questions have been asked about flood
control in the City and also about retaining walls, which were hit hardest
from the storm, and ways of correcting some of these problems in the
future and would like a report from Staff on the emergency the City had
recently.
B. Report of City Manager
There was no report.
C. Report of City Attorney
Pauly presented Council with a copy of a memorandum which contains a
partial summary of 1987 laws affecting municipalities. Pauly
emphasized page one, with reference to the indemnification of officers
and employees for punitive damage awards; page two, the fact a woman
may no longer use her husband's name on a ballot when running for
office; page three, at the bottom, with reference to the pesticide
regulation; page four pointed out the change in the dumping fee that
goes to the City; and also said the filing dates for municipal elections is
between eight and ten weeks prior to the election. Pauly also mentioned
that limitations have been removed with regard to the amount of interest
general obligation bonds may bear and also amount of interest which
City Council Minutes 22 August 4, 1987
may be imposed with regard to special assessments. Pauly emphasized
page five, the change in notice for special meetings; page seven, with
reference to construction controls for reduction in aircraft noise in zones
surrounding airports, also, parental leave provisions; page nine, the
pipeline safety act.
D. Report of Director of Planning
There was none.
E. Report of Director of Community Services
There was none.
F. Report of Director of Public Works
1. Resolution declaring costs to be assessed and ordering
preparation of 1987 Special Assessment Rolls and setting
hearing date (Resolution No. 87-225)
Director of Public Works Dietz said this is a resolution that declares the
amount of cost that be assessed for the fall special assessment hearing
and sets a date of September 1st for the special assessment hearing.
Dietz said this normally would have been a Consent Calendar item and
standard operating procedure by Code. Dietz said the total costs are
approximately $7.5 million, City funds are $2.6 million, and assessed
amount is $4.9 million.
Bentley asked Dietz if he's recommending proceeding with the
assessment of item 9. IC. 52-101 at this time. Dietz said Staff is, but
there's two lots that may have to be excluded from the final roll and
mentioned it's important to assess the balance of the project at this time
instead of waiting. Bentley asked if Council should hold two of these
meetings per year and Dietz replied they've talked about holding two a
year but there never seems to be anything ready to go in the spring since
most of the work is completed in the fall.
Bentley referred to a Council meeting that took place six years ago and
talked of a process for which the necessary legal procedure could be
accommodated and would not necessarily have to take place in the
presence of Council. Jullie said he recalled that meeting and said there
was a process ready logo in the event the City is challenged. Pauly said
City Council Minutes 23 August 4, 1987
that process was evolved as a result of court decisions that indicated the
court would give some weight to the Council's decision on whether or not
a project benefited a property, if Council received competent evidence
and made a decision on that basis. Pauly said recent cases are
indicating that the courts are going to take a fresh look at the valuation
and question of whether benefit has occurred as a result of improvement.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to move Resoultuion
No. 87-225.
Peterson suggested that Council consider a Special Assessment
Hearing on another night other than a Council meeting night. Dietz said
it's not too late to change the date and that Council could spend at least
two hours on this hearing. Anderson agreed with setting a special
meeting date.
Peterson asked if the maker of the motion would approve a meeting to be
scheduled for 7:30 p.m. on September 8th. Anderson agreed.
Pidcock asked Dietz what he means by the reassessment of Chatham
Woods. Dietz said 15 lots in the Chatham Woods subdivision went for
tax forfeit and the only way to the City can collect the special assessment
on them is to reassess.
Bob Blount, 6501 West 168th Avenue, asked what the notification
process was being followed regarding the amount to be assessed
against his property. Dietz said what Blount is referring to is for trunk,
sewer and water proposed for Majestic Oaks property for approximately
$13,000. The property was assessed in 1973 for one unit of lateral
benefit, which served Blount's home, and for half an acre of trunk
assessments against the four to five acrea parcel. Dietz said that
information of the amount to be assessed against the property to be
subdivided was later than normally processed, but that notification of the
assessment hearing would occur probably wihtin the next few weeks.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion approved 5-0-0.
2. Review deferment policies for Special Assessments (Continued from
July 21, 1987)
This item was continued to the next regularly scheduled City Council
meeting.
City Council Minutes 24 August 4, 1987
XI. NEW BUSINESS
Peterson said Jullie suggested there be a joint School Board/City Council
meeting held on August 18, 1987 at 5:30 p.m. held at City Council Chambers.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to hold the joint School
Board/City Council meeting on August 18, 1987 at 5:30 at City Council
Chambers. Motion approved 5-0-0.
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adjourn the meeting at
11:45 p.m. Motion approved 5-0-0.
City Council Minutes 1 August 18, 1987
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, August 18, 1987
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
7:30 P.M., CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia
Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City
Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger
Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of
Planning Chris Enger, Director of Community
Services Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works
Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Linda
Jacobson
ROLL CALL: All members were present.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following items were added to the Agenda: X.A.1. Peterson - Discussion on
proposed statement prepared by Mr. Rosow regarding the public landfill meeting
to be held August 19, 1987; X.A.2. Anderson - Discussion on growth in the future
for Eden Prairie . Item L was added to the consent calendar.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Agenda and
Other Items of Business, as amended and published. Motion carried 5-0-0.
II. MINUTES
A. Regular City Council meeting held Tuesday. July 7. 1987
The following items were changed: Page 4, Paragraph 1, 2nd Sentence,
to read as follows: "It does not preclude other organizations from requesting
the same consideration."
Page 6, Paragraph 7, 4th Sentence, to read as follows: "The drainage
channel would move into higher terrain which would cause more extensive
City Council Minutes 2 August 18, 1987
grading."
Page 9, Paragraph 2, to read as follows: "Harris asked if at the time the
original Timber Creek project was approved whether it was understood that
there would be further development of the area in question at a future point."
Page 11, Paragraph 2, 4th Sentence, to read as follows: "Bentley said one of
the purposes of the PUD is to cluster densities in some cases in order to
preserve natural amenities, etc."
Page 13, Paragraph 9, to read as follows: "Bentley asked Enger if this entire
area is going to develop as office/warehouse buildings."
Page 17, Paragraph 1, to read as follows: "Anderson replied through the
years they've had many complaints from residents taking business outside of
the community." Page 17, Paragraph 3, to read as follows: "Motion failed
2-2-1. Bentley and Peterson opposed, Harris abstained." Page 17, Paragraph
4, to read as follows: "Motion fails 2-3-0. Pidcock, Peterson and Anderson
opposed."
Page 19, Paragraph 3, 1st Sentence, to read as follows: "Bentley said he
would support a request to reverse the Board of Appeals and Adjustments
because the Council was aware when granting the zoning approval of the
variances." Page 19, Paragraph 4, to read as follows: "Anderson mentioned
the fact of the 7 -0 vote not to approve by the Planning Staff and the
recommendation for nonapproval by the Staff and the 5 - 0 denial by the Board
of Appeals and Adjustment; when Council disagrees with that many people,
Council should take another look at this issue." Page 19, Paragraph 5,
2nd Sentence, change "had" to "held". Page 19, Paragraph 7, change "other"
to "previous". Page 19, Paragraph 10, Second Sentence, to read as follows:
"Pidcock replied in this case she would see it as very favorable since you have
single family down the street almost to the bank."
Page 20, Paragraph 4, to read as follows: "MOTION: Bentley moved,
seconded by Harris, to overrule the Board of Appeals decision and that we
grant Variance Request No. 87-20 and adopt the Findings of Fact and the
legal findings in support of the decision." Page 20, Paragraph 5, 2nd
Sentence, to read as follows: "It's important the City have credibility with the
community." Page 20, Paragraph 7, change the vote on the motion to "4-1-0
with Anderson opposing."
Page 21, Paragraph 1, change the vote on the motion to "4-1-0 with Anderson
City Council Minutes 3 August 18, 1987
opposing." Page 21, VIII. A., to read as follows: "MOTION: Bentley moved,
seconded by Harris, to approve the recommendation of the Historical and
Cultural Commission changing terms from two years to three years." Page 21,
X.A.1., "MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to publicly commend
Mr. Lambert and his Staff for the fine 4th of July display and organization of 4th
of July events."
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Minutes of the
Regular City Council Meeting held on July 7, 1987 as published and
amended. Motion approved 5-0-0.
B. Special City Council meeting held Monday. July 27. 1987
The following items were changed: Page 3, Paragraph 8, new paragraph after
the first sentence ending "Special Tax Credit". Page 3, Paragraph 9,
"Anderson recited language In the City Code, Chapter 2, Page 10, Section
2.09, Subdivision 2, which stated that during a natural disaster requiring a
Declaration of a State of Emergency, the continuity of duly elected and lawful
leadership of the City and continuity of government required that the Council
meet forthwith. Anderson questioned the leadership of the City at the time of
the emergency on July 23 and July 25."
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to approve the Minutes of the
Special City Council Meeting held July 27, 1987 as published and amended.
Motion approved 5-0-0.
Ill. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. WESTWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK 4TH ADDITION, by Dallas Development
Company. Approval of Developers Agreement for Westwood Industrial Park
4th Addition. 14.36 acres into 2 lots. Location: South of County Road #67,
east of Bury Drive.
C. ANDERSON'S GARDEN SHOPPE--Approval of Architectural Elevations for
Structures
D. Accept and award bids for tennis courts
E. 1st Reading of Ordinance No 43-87. Park Use Ondinance Amendment
City Council Minutes 4 August 18, 1987
F. final Plat approval for Jay Wallace Addition (located east of Franlo Road and
north of Laurel Drive) Resolution No. 87-236
G. final Plat approval for Jarrett Estates (home of Anderson Garden Center).
Located east of Eden Prairie Road and south of Valley View Road.
(Resolution No. 87-237)
H. Change Order No. 3. Valley View Road. I. C. 52-272
I. Approve plans and specifications for MN/DOT project to landscape/screen
Countryside Auto Pans (Resolution No. 87-239)
J. Resolution requesting (MWCC) sewer connectionpermit for the Ridge 3rid
Addition (Resolution No. 87-240)
K. Resolution reauesting easements over Lot 4 and 29. Eden Prairie Acres. from
Hennepin County (tax delinauent property) Resolution No. 87-241
L. LEGION PARK by R. M. Feerick and Associations, 2nd Reading of Ordinance
No. 32-87, Rezoning from 1-2 and 1-General to Community Commercial;
approval of Developers Agreement for Legion Park; and Adoption of
Resolution No. 87-242 authorizing summary of Ordinance No. 32-87 and
Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 2.6 acres into one lot and road
right-of-way.
City Manager Jullie said that Staff has reviewed Item L and everything is in
order. Jullie said that Final Plat is also submitted for approval with a
requirement for an additional ten feet of right-of-way along County Road 4,
which has been included in the plat report as a necessary change prior to
report. Jullie said the developer has been advised that they must go back to
the Board of Appeals for a variance prior to issuance since ten feet slightly
amends prior variances granted by the Board of Appeals.
Peterson asks for a clarification o1 Item I and Dietz replied that the Department
of Transportation has a budget to screen a number of salvage auto yards
throughout the State. Dietz said the State will be doing this screening work to
Countryside Auto Parts on Highway 169 and said he had a plan for
Councilmembers to review and discussed the different types of trees that will
be used.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve Items A - L on the
Consent Calendar. Motion approved 5-0-0.
City Council Minutes 5 August 18, 1987
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. FOUNTAIN PLACE, by CSM Corporation. Request for Comprehensive Guide
Plan Amendment from Regional commercial to High Density Residential on 8
acres and from Public Open Space to High Density Residential on 4.5 acres,
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on approximately 52 acres,
Planned Unit Development District Review and zoning District Change from
Rural to RM-2.5 on 29.3 acres with variances, Preliminary Plat of
approximately 52 acres into 4 lots, 1 outlot, and road right-of-way, and
Environmental Assessment Worksheet Review for construction of a 490-unit
apartment project. Location: West of Highway #169, north of Columbine
Road. (Resolution No. 87-229, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment;
Resolution #87-230, PUD Concept of Fountain Place; Ordinance
#40-87-PUD-9-87, PUD District and Rezoning; Resolution #87-231,
Preliminary Plat; Resolution #87-232, Declaring No Significant Impact, EAW)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Paul Fjare, representing the proponent, addressed the proposal.
Mike McDonald, representing the proponent, addressed the proposal.
Planning Director Enger said the Planning Commission reviewed this item at
the July 27th meeting. The Planning Commission recommended approval of
the proposal on a 5 - 0 vote subject to plans submitted by the proponent and
revisions as called for in the Staff report of July 24th.
Enger said the Planning Commission is recommending 68 percent brick
exterior for the project. Enger referred to Staff report of July 24th. Enger said
proponent has prepared a traffic study, which the Planning Commission has
reviewed, and the study recommends Columbine Road be extended to the
north to come out south of Flagship Athletic Club at Prairie Center Drive; if
Columbine Road is not extended with this project, the intersection of Anderson
Lakes Parkway and Highway 169 will exceed level capacity. Staff would
recommend to Council to phase the 490 units if the road improvement of
Columbine Road does not go forward.
Director of Community Services Lambert said the Parks, Recreation and
Natural Resources Commission reviewed this proposal August 17th and
City Council Minutes 6 August 18,1987
recommended approval as per the Planning Staff report of July 24th, with the
addition that the six foot private walkway east of building four be expanded to
eight feet and the walkway will extend from Magnolia Drive down to the
Purgatory Creek Recreation area and be within a twenty foot public walkway
easement.
Bentley asked Enger where the 68 percent brick figure came from and Enger
said it came from the Planning Commission and architectural renderings that
represented 62 percent and the Planning Commission's desire to see code
adhered to 75 percent and the architects volunteering that perhaps brick could
be added to bring it up to 68 percent.
Bentley asked the builder if they've looked at 68 percent brick exterior. Mr.
Holmes referred to a drawing depictintt the building with 62 percent brick and
then an overlay depicting 68 percent brick.
Bentley asked about the traffic levels of Anderson Lakes Parkway and
Highway 169, and how much of the problem is a result of Highway 169 traffic.
Enger said the problem is Highway 169. Bentley asked whether Columbine
Road goes in or not, if there will still be that level of traffic at that intersection
and Enger said the problem is having only two lanes on Highway 169 at
Anderson Lakes Parkway. Enger mentioned there needs to be bypass lanes
or four lanes. Bentley asked if the traffic problem is due to Highway 169, then
this project is not going to impact Highway 169 to any measurable level.
Enger said if Columbine Road is not extended through, more traffic will go
down to Highway 169.
Bentley asked if the road connection out to Highway 169 will be a right-in,
right-out only and Dietz replied the City received approval from MnDOT to
signalize an intersection at this location. Bentley asked if it will be signalized
as part of the construction process and Dietz didn't believe it would be.
Bentley mentioned the traffic situation during rush hour on Highway 169. Dietz
said the expansion of Highway 169 would be implemented first and then as
volumes developed that's when a signal would be placed at Columbine Road
and Highway 169.
Mitch Wonson, traffic consultant for the proponent, stated that this road
connection would be a right turn island, right-in only, and be designed so it
would be very difficult to make a left turn. He also talked about signage that
would be placed in the area. Wonson said upon upgrading of Highway 169 a
full intersection would be constructed.
City Council Minutes 7 August 18,1987
Pidcock mentioned the amount of parking spaces and Fjare said there will be
slightly under one thousand, indoor and outdoor. Pidcock said that's only two
per unit and asked where visitors will park. Holmes said he's never found
where all residents are home at once with their cars and visitors too. Pidcock
asked Enger if this was enough parking for the project and Enger said one
interior space and one exterior space has worked well within the City and the
ordinance has been adequate.
Pidcock asked what the balconies are made of and Holmes said they are
wood picket.
Harris asked if Castle Ridge has voiced an objection over extending
Columbine Road or is Castle Ridge still reviewing the petition. Fjare said he
contacted Larry Mikan and Mikan said he has not declined or refused to sign
the petition, he just hasn't had time to review it yet.
Harris said by increasing the amount of brick on the face of the building it
would change the architectural design and Holmes agreed with that statement.
Harris asked if the design would change to meet the 68 percent and Holmes
said to meet 68 percent they would have to change the roof articulation and
look at other areas to put brick. Holmes referred to the drawings to explain the difference with more brick. Enger mentioned that the Planning Commission
liked the building the way it was, but would also like the building to meet the
ordinance. The Planning Commission recommended a compromise at 68
percent.
Peterson asked Enger to elaborate on the proponent's statement that the
building code that prohibits the use of brick beyond 25 feet or the third floor.
Enger said that the Building Inspections Department Staff assured him that it
can be done, and if the proposal goes through with 68 percent brick there
would be brick at the fourth level.
Anderson asked Staff if the main reason for 75 percent minimum brick exterior
was for maintenance reasons. Enger responded this was true, and that it
added durability. Enger mentioned brick is maintenance free for many, many
years as opposed to painting or aluminum siding which usually has a 20 year
warranty. Anderson also asked what type of wood would be used for the
siding and McDonald said cedar siding. McDonald also mentioned that metal
siding and vinyl siding is excluded from the ordinance at this time.
Anderson asked about the project location to the floodplain area and if it would
be flooded if there's another hundred year rainfall. Holmes said on the
City Council Minutes 8 August 18, 1987
morning after the the July 23-24 rainfall the water level reached 823.96 and
the hundred year floodplain elevation is 824. Anderson asked if water would
have gotten to these buildings in such a rainfall and Fjare said the water did
not get out of the hundred year floodplain mark. Fjare pointed on the drawings
to the hundred year floodplain markings. Anderson asked if any parking lots
will be in the floodplain and Fjare said the approximately 30 parking spaces
will be at elevation level.
Anderson asked Lambert if there are private walkways in the City at the current
time and Lambert said that there were. Anderson asked if those walks have
signs stating they are private and Lambert said they don't. Anderson asked
where there are private walkways around the City and Lambert mentioned the
Preserve development and that these sidewalks are owned and maintained
privately. Anderson asked if the sidewalks in this project are going to have
signs stating they are private walkways. Fjare pointed out where the walkways
would run on the drawing and said they would be eight foot walkways within a
twenty foot public easement from the public right-of-way to the northern
property line of the Fountain Place project.
Anderson asked what the proponent is going to do to prevent the loss of trees
while the area is under construction. Fjare talked about snow fencing the
areas because of the significant amount of trees on the slope. Anderson
wanted to know what the developer would do if the bulldozer operators
knocked down 40 or 45 trees and the developer said he had nothing to do with
it. Fjare stated they're planning to fence the area around the trees and the cat
operators wouldn't have any reason for being in there. Said they want to save
all the trees also and that there aren't enough trees on the project that way it is.
Anderson asked if there's been any dedication of floodplain and Lambert said
there's no request for dedication of floodplain. Lambert referred to the
Purgatory Creek Recreation area and said the City would take cash in lieu of
land dedication, and the City does not require dedication of land as part of the
development since that takes away the ability to receive a donation of giving
land to the City.
Pidcock asked if this project could be done in phases and Holmes said there
are two phases contemplated presently. Holmes referred to phase one and
two on the drawings. Holmes said the earliest phase one would be completed
for occupancy would be September 1st. Holmes said they would start the
major construction on phase two after phase one is done and not have a lot of
construction done on phase two until 1989.
City Council Minutes 9 August 18, 1987
Bentley said he likes the way the project looks and said he's prepared to
include 62 percent brick exterior as part of the PUD. Bentley said he would be
prepared to include the height variance as part of the PUD. Bentley said the
major concern over traffic is the entrance point out to Highway 169 and would
request that be a right-in, right-out only until such time as it is signalized.
Peterson asked if the extension of Columbine Road would come out between
the properties of Flagship and Castle Ridge and Enger said it would. Peterson
asked Wonson what traffic service level the City moves to with the extension of
Columbine at Prairie Center Drive and Highway 169 and Wonson said he did
not calculate exact level of service at Prairie Center Drive and 169. Wonson
said the BRW study indicated the level of service at C at that intersection.
Peterson asked what process is required to make sure Columbine gets
included along with this project. Dietz replied Staff has a signed petition by
two out of three and that Staff did not prepare any resolution. Dietz said in the
past Staff recommended no 2nd Reading until a feasibility study has been
done, but also mentioned the third party may sign the petition and then it
would be past the feasibility study stage and right to the plans and
specifications.
Peterson mentioned the fact that first occupancy is not for another 16, 18
months and will not be overcrowding any intersection for two years. Enger
said the only concern would be whether Columbine is built at all. Dietz
mentioned the fact that Columbine will not be an easy road to build and the
distribution of assessments will be one-sided.
Peterson said he would not want to make 2nd Reading contingent on the
resolution of Columbine Road, but agrees with the need for additional access
to the north. Bentley suggested that through a second motion Council agree
that if resolution through one hundred percent petition is not forthcoming by
2nd Reading, Council at that time order a feasibility study be done.
Harris said she likes the project as it looks and stated the overlay of the
building with the additional brick gives it an institutional appearance.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to Close the Public Hearing
and Adopt Resolution No. 87-229 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment.
Motion approved 5-0-0.
City Council Minutes 10 August 18, 1987
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to Adopt Resolution No.
87-230 for PUD Concept approval, including the requested height variance
and face brick variance at 62 percent. Motion approved 5-0-0.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to Approve 1st Reading of
Ordinance No. 40-87-PUD-9-87 for PUD District and Rezoning, with 2nd
Reading of the Ordinance to occur after making satisfactory provision for
Columbine Road; including the requested height variance and face brick
variance at 62 percent. Motion approved 5-0-0.
Bentley asked if Council can make a motion that a feasibility study process
automatically begins if one hundred percent petition is not forthcoming by 2nd
Reading or does Council take a separate action at that time. City Attorney
Pauly said Council could do it conditionally at this time. Bentley said that
would be his motion.
Anderson said he agreed with the right-in, right-out only at Highway 169, but
asked if there should be language in the motion to read "until such time as a
light or semaphore is installed". Bentley said the understanding would be until
such time a signal would be apparent; at that point ,the right-in, right-out
restriction would be terminated. Peterson said the assumption of the motion is
forever. Bentley said he'd be happy to add the words "until signalized".
Discussion had between Bentley and Peterson about when the intersection
would be signalized. Peterson said the affect of the motion would not in any
way preclude the possibility of signalizing that intersection and Bentley said,
"no".
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to Adopt Resolution No.
87-231 approving the Preliminary Plat, with Final Plat approval subject to
satisfactory provision for Columbine Road; including a right-in, tight-out for the
road connection at Highway 169 until signalized; that a feasibility study
process automatically begins if one hundred percent petition is not received by
2nd Reading. Motion approved 5-0-0.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to Adopt Resolution No.
87-232 declaring that an Environmental Assessment Worksheet shows no
significant impact. Motion approved 5-0-0.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to Direct Staff to prepare a
Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff
recommendations and Council Conditions. Motion approved 5-0-0.
City Council Minutes 11 August 18, 1987
B. DATASERV, by Opus Corporation. Request for Planned Unit Development
Concept Amendment on 17.4 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2
on approximately 1.5 acres for the construction of an additional parking area
for the existing Dataserv Headquarters. Location: East of the intersection of
Technology Drive and Prairie Center Drive. (Resolution No. 87-233,
Amending DataServ PUD Concept; Ordinance #41-87, Rezoning)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Bob Worthington, representing the proponent, addressed the proposal.
Planning Director Enger said the Planning Commission reviewed this item at
the July 27th meeting and recommended approval subject to
recommendations of Staff report dated July 24th. Enger said this was not
reviewed by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission.
Bentley asked if Council placed any condition of the building usage adjacent
to Dataserv in terms of industrial versus office. Enger said this is supposed to
be 75 percent office when complete. Bentley referred to Staff report stating 50
percent office use maximum allowed in al-2 zoning district and wanted to
make sure Council is not presupposing any sort of development for building
purposes on this parcel. Enger said the Developer's Agreement would be
consistent with the original Developer's Agreement with regard to percentage
of office.
Bentley asked what necessitates amending the PUD concept. Enger said this
is a parking lot that serves Dataserv's needs but it's not exactly what's shown
in the PUD concept. If Dataserv elects to have Opus build the other part of the
building for them, then the PUD concept would prevail.
Bentley asked what justifies a change in concept because there's nothing in
the concept there that is going to be dissimilar to what has already been
approved. Enger said it's a matter of degree and under that way of thinking
there would be not need for a PUD concept amendment.
Peterson asked Worthington if he's assuming in the near future there will be
less parking required by occupants of the present building and when the
additional building is constructed there will be sufficient parking. Worthington
said he is not making any parking presumptions for phase two. The reason for oversizing the parking is he doesn't want to have to come back if the situation
City Council Minutes 12 August 18, 1987
escalates. Worthington talked about the future parking needs with phase two
completed. Worthington said the parking arrangement that is being proposed
will take care of immediate parking needs, up to the next two years and
beyond, and hopefully go on with future expansion to fit Dataserv's growth
needs and parking needs onto the site.
Pidcock mentioned Opus' beautification project downtown around the parking
lot and asked Worthington if that could be possible for Eden Prairie.
Worthington said right now they're trying to take care of the shortage of
parking. He said if Council indulges this situation for two to three years, Opus
will bring in something that will be consistent not only with this site but be an
improvement with anything they've done.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Bentley, to Close the Public Hearing
and Adopt Resolution No. 87-233 amending the Dataserv PhD Concept.
Motion approved 5-0-0.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to Approve 1st Reading of
Ordinance No. 41-87 for Rezoning. Motion approved 5-0-0.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Bentley, to Direct Staff to amend the
Development Agreement incorporating the Commission and Staff
recommendations.
Anderson asked how Council can be guaranteed in three years this doesn't
become a permanent parking lot. Enger said the recommendation is not set
up for any time limitation, so if Council wishes there to be one, Council would
have to place one on the proposal.
Anderson asked Worthington if he's comfortable with three years and
Worthington said he was. Worthington suggested Council ask Opus to come
back before Council within the three year period, if nothing has happened, and
explain the status of the situation. Then Council could take action on an
extension or some other definitive action; otherwise, the temporary parking lot
may need to be removed.
AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to
Direct Staff to amend the Development Agreement incorporating the
Commission and Staff recommendations; that developer come before Council
within a three year period of time for review.
City Council Minutes 13 August 18, 1987
Bentley said he doesn't see the need for this since the proposal is very straight
forward. Said it would be irresponsible for Council to say if the situation is the
same in three years, you can no longer use the parking space. Anderson
stated that that wasn't the motion, the motion was they must come back within
three years to explain what they are going to do. Bentley said he was
opposed to making this motion conditional rezoning of this property.
Pauly said the motion to amend is a directory type of motion and not
mandatory in the sense it's only asking for an appearance. He said Opus is
sitting with the additional property available and they'll have to come back and
deal with that. Pauly said Opus will probably be very circumspect about
maintaining the commitments that Worthington has made.
Anderson asked Pauly if a temporary parking lot could last ten years and
Pauly said that it could. Pauly said the rezoning would be effective and didn't
think there would be any way to undo that once it became effective.
Worthington stated Opus will develop the property since it's too expensive to
carry as temporary parking.
Peterson said he would vote against the motion to amend. Harris said she
agrees with Bentley's point and would vote against the motion to amend.
VOTE ON THE MOTION TO AMEND: Motion to amend fails 0-5-0.
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion approved 5-0-0.
Upon agreement of Council members, Item IV. D. was moved ahead of Item IV. C.
on the Agenda.
D. VACATION OF CONSERVATION AND DRAINA E AND UTILITY
EASEMENTS ON LOT 10. BLOCK 1. BLUESTEM HILLS 1ST ADDITION.
(Located south of Blossom Road, east of Bennett Place) Resolution No.
87-235
City Manager Jullie said this is vacation of conservation , drainage and utility
easements at Bluestem Hills Addition as a result of replatting. Jullie said this
is basically a housekeeping item.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to Close the Public Hearing
City Council Minutes 14 August 18, 1987
and Adopt Resolution No. 87-235 vacating the easements. Motion approved
5-0-0.
C. SOUTHWEST CROSSING II, by Vantage Companies. Request for Planned
Unit Development Concept Amendment of 109.68 acres, Planned Unit
Development District Review on 109.68 acres with variances for building
height, Zoning District Change from Commercial Regional to Office on 5.13
acres and Board of Appeals variances for Shoreland setback, building height,
impervious surface, and impervious surface below the high water mark of
Smetana Lake for the construction of a 247,000 square foot office building.
Location: North of Viking Drive, and south of Smetana Lake. (Resolution
#87-234, PUD Concept Amendment of Southwest Crossing PUD; Ordinance
#42-87-PUD-10-87, PUD District and Rezoning)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Kelly Dorn, representing the proponent, addressed the proposal.
Richard Varda and Brian Carlson, representing the architects, talked about the
building design.
Planning Director Enger said the Planning Commission reviewed this item at
the July 13th, July 27th and August 10th meetings. Enger referred to the Staff
recommendations from the July 24th Staff report. Enger also mentioned the
traffic study which was in conformance with the City's desire for ultimate traffic
generation on this property. He mentioned the need for a traffic signal at
Viking Drive and Prairie Center Drive and the issue of who's responsible for
the signal is still open.
Enger referred to a model of the development site and said it's divided into to
pieces. The idea is to approve a 10-story building with a request for concept
approval for a second 14-story building so proponent can proceed with
assurance that second building would be Included in the subsequent zoning
request with the project. Enger stated that all variances needed for the first
building will be needed for the second building also.
Enger said the Planning Commission recommended the approval on a 5 - 0
vote of the request for the overall master plan, the planned unit development concept amendment on this specific site and the rezoning with variances,
except shoreland variances. Enger said the Planning Commission was
City Council Minutes 15 August 18, 1987
concerned that conservancy areas and "sender sites" (those from which
development density is being transferred), be adequately restricted in the
future to carry out the intent of the overall master plan, subject to Staff report of
July 24th.
Peterson asked if the proponent is cooperative with the restrictions on the
sender sites and Enger said after discussion with Pauly Staff would put the
development agreement in recordable form and be approached in the same
manner as drafting restrictive covenants. Enger said there will be significant
limitations in sender sites in form of recordable documents.
Bentley asked Enger if the developer is requesting any variances at this time
and Enger said they're not requesting any variances for the 14-story building
section of the request. Bentley said they're requesting variances on the
10-story building on the rezoned property and Enger agreed with that. Bentley
said if approval is given to the revised PUD that there was an intent on the
Board's part to assume that variances on the 14-story site would occur and
Enger agreed with this.
Pidcock said she thought they said they were seeking variances on a change
in the floor area ratio for the entire proposal from .40 to .97 and Enger
responded that the developer is requesting all the variances for phase one of
this project, the rezoning phase, and they're not requesting any variances for
any conceptual phase. Pidcock said she understood Carlson to ask for
variances on shoreland management, impervious surfaces, and building
height from 130 feet to 153 and Enger agreed with this. Enger said some
shoreland variances will need to go to the Board of Appeals since they cannot
be amended by State law through a PUD process.
Director of Community Services Lambert said the Parks, Recreation and
Natural Resources Commission reviewed this August 17th and recommended
approval as per Planning Staff report of July 24th. Lambert said the major
concerns were preservation of the eastern end sites, relationship of the
building to the fake and landscaping transition that accompanies that, the trail
system and screening of the parking areas. Lambert mentioned that these
questions were answered to the Commission's satisfaction and the vote was
unanimous to approve as per Staff report.
Bentley asked about the current status of Golden Triangle Drive. Dietz said
there are temporary culverts in place in the creek and surcharge is in place for
the earth work portion of crossing the creek. Dietz said there's a feasibility
study currently being developed.
City Council Minutes 16 August 18, 1987
Bentley asked for clarification regarding the nature of the restrictions on the
sender properties. Enger said the restrictions would be in impervious
surfaces, open floor area ratio, on building height, on building setback.
Bentley asked if they're going to be restrictive covenants and Enger said they'll
be called a development agreement in recordable form. Pauly said he hasn't
come to a conclusion as to what the document would specifically be called, but
it will be a document that transfers the development rights which Enger just
mentioned from so-called sender areas to the user areas. Pauly said the
document would say that in this development the developer owned all the
property and that the document will recite the fact that there are certain
restrictions which are being exceeded on the properly which is under
development and through this process certain of those restrictions are being
waived or modified in consideration of the transfer of similar analogous rights
from the sending properties and as a result the sending properties in the future
will not be permitted to develop those properties in the same degree as they
would have been but for the existence of the agreement.
Bentley posed a hypothetical situation such that if there was a residential
piece of property and the net density allowed would be 2.5 units per acre and
there's one area developed as medium density where the density is less than
seven units per acre, how does the City control the other portions in such a
way that the total net density of the development will not exceed 2.5. Pauly
said it may be controlled by concurrent development or zoning of concurrent
zoning of disparate areas in which greater or less density is permitted.
Another example is when the City obtains contribution of park land or natural
open space land, that's done concurrently with the approval of the zoning.
Another example is where the City receives conservancy easement over a
portion of the property and that would be done concurrently with approval of
the zoning. Once these are place of record they effectively preclude
development of the remaining lands.
Bentley asked if the vehicles used would be the PUD agreement by revision
through this project and the development agreement and Pauly agreed with
Bentley and said he would have an agreement which would specifically
address this problem.
Pidcock asks what relationship these buildings are going to have to Southwest
Crossing I. Varda explained the architectural issues between Southwest
Crossing I and Southwest Crossing II and how the buildings will complement
each other.
City Council Minutes 17 August 18, 1987
Anderson mentioned that he has mixed emotions over where you reach a limit
on building height in the City and said at some point Council will have to set a
limit to building height. Anderson also talked about the screened parking lots
and asked what one would see when driving down the freeway in an
automobile. Varda refers to two drawings here and mentioned that the Wilson
Learning Center is taller than the first phase and shorter than the second
phase in terms of actual elevation. Dorn says the second building will be 18 to
21 feet taller then the Wilson Learning building.
Anderson asked if from the freeway one could see Smetana Lake and Dorn
said to a certain degree yes and no because of the desire to screen the
parking from the view of 494. Dom goes on to talk about how they have
screened the parking area. Bentley said currently when one drives on 494
one doesn't have much of a view of Smetana Lake because of the distance
across the roadways. Bentley said the best view would be further to the east
looking towards the northwest. Anderson said he wants to find out how much
of the view will be lost. Mitch Wonson, traffic consultant for the proponent, said
in working with Staff they removed the highest level parking to angle down to
get the best view of the lake and he referred to the drawings to explain this.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to Close the Public Hearing
and Adopt Resolution No. 87-234 for PUD Concept Amendment subject to
Commission and Staff recommendations (this would revise the master PUD
and give Concept approval to the 14-story building). Motion approved 5-0-0.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to Approve 1st Reading of
Ordinance No. 42-87-PUD-10-87 for PUD District Review and Rezoning
subject to Commission and Staff recommendations (this action would apply to
the 10-story office building). Motion approved 5-0-0.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to Direct Staff to prepare a
Development Agreement for the 10-story office building property and
amendments to the master Development Agreement for Southwest Crossing,
both incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations and the legal
conditions that Mr. Pauly mentioned.
Anderson said he was not familiar with legal documents and asked Pauly how
legal and how binding are they. Pauly said they are a form which is gaining
acceptance in the country and said he will do further review to give Council
appropriate assurance prior to 2nd Reading.
City Council Minutes 18 August 18,1987
VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion approved 5-0-0.
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Payment of Claims
Nos. 36569 to 36906. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Harris, Pidcock and
Peterson voted "aye". Motion approved 5-0-0.
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
There were none.
VII. PETITIONS. REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
There were none.
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
There were none.
IX. APPOINTMENTS
There were none.
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS. BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Peterson - Discussion on landfill public meeting for 8-19-87
Peterson talked about a meeting with Mr. Jullie and Mr. Rosow last week
and the analysis of Ms. Lehman's report which is included in Council's
packet. Peterson referred Council to page two of the summary by Mr.
Rosow and said that is the tenure of the statement he intends to make at
the meeting on August 19th.
Peterson said Council was invited by the Metropolitan Council to make
comments but doesn't see this as an opportunity to criticize BFI or
Woodlake, only to express appreciation for the opportunity to respond and
offer public input.
City Council Minutes 19 August 18,1987
Pidcock said she would have liked to have been invited to this meeting last
week and it would have been informative to be there. Peterson said where
do you draw the line on how many Council people you invite without
having a Council meeting.
Anderson said the Council will have to reach a position on the expansion
of the landfill and it can be just the Mayors position or each individual
Councilmembers position. Anderson said a statement from the Mayor is
fine as long as it is not a statement from the City of Eden Prairie.
Anderson suggested there be a Council meeting to establish a position
of the Council. Bentley said sooner or later Council will have to take
action relative to a proposal but didn't feel Council should assume some
posture now before there actually is an official proposal before Council.
Harris said it's premature to take a public position and said the summary
seems pretty innocuous from scanning it quickly. Harris said she thinks it's
important to make a statement at the hearing. Also, any formal statement
that represents the City's "position" must be an agreed upon statement that
represents all members of the Council. Harris said she's comfortable with
the Mayor making a statement in his capacity as an official of the City
which doesn't bind the Council in any way to the course of action. Pauly
stated he has every confidence in Mr. Rosow being careful not to foreclose
any avenues.
Peterson said it was not his intent to state the position of the City or City
Council, that it's only a statement.
Pauly mentioned the meeting on this issue as part of the settlement
process and one of the points of that meeting was that this informational
meeting be held to discuss the reports prepared by BFI and the City's consultant and obtain further public comment. Pauly said all of this
material will go to Metropolitan Council's staff, which in turn will prepare a
staff report and that report will go to the Environmental Resources
Committee for review and then on to the full Metropolitan Council for
review and approval or disapproval.
Pauly said he's reviewed the summary submitted by Mayor Peterson and
it's just a recitation of the history of how the City got to the meeting and it's
designed to set the stage for those people who are going to be there and
maybe haven't followed this in detail as we all have and views this
City Council Minutes 20 August 18, 1987
summary as quite neutral. Pauly said the substantive concerns over the
expansion of the project are set forth in Ms. Lehman's report and not this
summary.
Peterson said he does not have to read the statement and asked if any
other Councilmember wished to read the statement at the meeting on
August 19th. Pidcock discussed her concerns over the importance of the
meeting between the Mayor, Staff and Ms. Lehman and that
Councilmembers should have been informed.
Harris said it's important to give the summary publicly since it also
addresses the City's role in this process which has been questioned
several times by people in the community on what the Council is doing for
them. Harris said Council should not take a position in public at the
meeting on August 19th because Council does not know all the
information and what direction it may want to pursue.
Anderson said it disturbed him to have a summary go out without having
input into that document and didn't like the idea of lack of communication
between Councilmembers. Bentley said the meeting on August 19th is
only a process meeting and not a policy meeting; it's not a meeting where
any decisions will be made. Bentley said he had no problem with the
Mayor reading the summary and Ms. Lehman making her comments.
Bentley replied he didn't think there's been lack of communication, that
he's received adequate information relative to the upcoming meeting.
2. Anderson - Discussion on growth of the City
Anderson mentioned the School Board meeting this evening and the $30
million plus school bond issue. Questioned if rapid growth was really good
for a City. Anderson referred to a comment from Mr. Enger that in five to
seven years if we continue to grow at the current rate the City could be
filled. Anderson requested a workshop session be setup in October or
November with Staff so that Council can 'find out the projections of where
the City is going and what's going to happen.
Harris said any review of that nature would also have to include legal
review of citing recent restraints on controlling growth. Said she didn't
agree with the idea of placing limits on growth outside of market
conditions. Bentley said he's concerned about placing governmental
control on growth because it's an artificially induced control and it should
be market driven.
City Council Minutes 21 August 18, 1987
Jullie suggested deferring this item to Staff and let Staff come back in a
couple weeks with some sort of preliminary report or judgment on coming
to some sort of meaningful forum or input that would help this process.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to set up a meeting with Council and Staff to look at the future growth of Eden Prairie. Motion
approved 5-0-0.
B. Report of City Manager
City Manager Jullie stated he had the 1-494 video if anyone would like to check
it out or take it home.
C. Report of City Attorney
City Attorney Pauly talked about the Orrin Thompson case the Minnesota
Court of Appeals decided last week that arose in Eagan. Pauly said this case
is a reminder that any restrictions that Council deems to be of permanence
and importance should be spelled out in a document in traditional form and
recorded.
Anderson asked about the large amount of property in Eden Prairie that hasn't
been deeded over to the City. Pauly said if Anderson is referring to situations
where people have promised to make donations to the Eden Prairie
Foundation, etc., for tax purposes and also to enhance civic interests, those
are not enforceable, they're simply oral promises or indications of intent.
D. Report of Director of Planning
There was no report.
E. JR non of Director of Community Services
There was no report.
F Report of Director of Public Works
1. Review deferment policies for Special Assessments
(Continued from August 4, 1987)
Bentley says the approach addresses what Council has been talking about
City Council Minutes 22 August 18, 1987
but he regrets eliminating the $1,000 credit in favor of excluding parcels
from the assessment district. Bentley said he agreed with this item though.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to Approve the policies
on special assessment deferments. Motion approved 5-0-0.
XI. NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business.
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adjourn the City Council
meeting at 11:25 p.m. Motion carried 5-0-0.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
September 15, 1987
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.)
Bendzick Builders
Card Construction
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY)
Daniel R. Evans Construction
Hidden Ridge Builders
HEATING & VENTILATING
New Mech Companies, Inc.
T.G.S. Mechanical, Inc.
GAS FITTER
New Mech Companies, Inc.
Northridge Plumbing Company
Sunset Heating & Air Conditioning
T.G.S Mechanical, Inc.
PEDDLAR
Ricky Allen Kirschbaum (firewood)
Ben A. Isder (firewood)
Marvin Michael Warzecha (firewood)
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for
the licensed activity.
Pat Solie, Licensing
. , ,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commissi
o
n
THRU:
Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM:
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE:
August 13,13, 1987
SUBJECT:
Request from New Concept Homes
Attached is a letter dated August 11, 1987 fro
m
R
o
b
e
r
t
B
j
o
r
k
l
a
n
d
,
P
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
o
f
New Concept Homes. Mr. Bjorkland is requesting
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
n
a
m
e
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
t
h
a
t
i
s
presently being developed with Wyndham Knoll as
W
Y
N
D
H
A
M
K
N
O
L
L
P
A
R
K
.
The Park has never been formally named, however
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
t
o
a
s
H
i
d
d
e
n
Glen Park, as that is the name of the first su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
H
i
d
d
e
n
Glen subdivision is located to the north of the
p
a
r
k
s
i
t
e
a
n
d
W
y
n
d
h
a
m
K
n
o
l
l
i
s
located to the east.
Community Services Staff believe Wyndham Knoll
P
a
r
k
i
s
a
m
o
r
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
n
a
m
e
for the park for the following reasons:
1. The park is located on a knoll, not in a glen.
2. Hidden Glen is very synonymous to Hidden Ponds,
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
t
e
n
d
t
o
b
e
confusing.
3. The development of the park is tied to the Wyndh
a
m
K
n
o
l
l
s
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
.
The Community Services Staff recommmend approval
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
o
f
M
r
.
Bjorkland to name the park Wyndham Knoll Park.
BL:md
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-255
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
EDEN POINTE
WHEREAS, the plat of EDEN POINTE has been submitted in a manner required for
platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of
the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for EDEN POINTE is approved upon compliance
with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat
dated SEPTEMBER 8, 1987.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving
the six-month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the
preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said
engineer's report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of
this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named
plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the
certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance
with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on SEPTEMBER 15, 1985.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician
DATE: September 8, 1987
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
SUBJECT: EDEN POINTE
PROPOSAL: The Developer, R. Neslund Company, has requested City Council
approval of the final plat of Eden Pointe, a multi-family apartment
development located at the southeast quadrant of Homeward Hills Road
and Pioneer Trail. The plat contains 15.28 acres to be divided into
one lot for construction of 143 apartment units and an interior
street and parking system.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council October 1,
1985, per Resolution 085-218.
Second reading of Ordinance No. 33-85-PUD-5-85, removing the land
from the RM 6.5 district and placing it into the planned unit
development 5-85-RM-2.5 district, was finally read and approved by
the City Council November 5, 1985.
The PUD Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was
executed November 5, 1985.
VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of
Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: All utilities and streets within the plat will be
privately owned and maintained.
The existing storm sewer in Homeward Hills Road and proposed extension
through the plat will be owned and maintained by the City. Easements
over proposed storm sewer will be required prior to release of final
plat.
Final construction plans for utilities and streets must be reviewed
and approved by the City Engineer prior to final plat release.
PAGE 2
EDEN POINTE SEPTEMBER 8, 1987
During the preliminary stages of approval
,
t
h
e
r
e
w
a
s
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
between City Council, City Staff, and the
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
need for a traffic signal at the intersec
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
i
o
n
e
e
r
T
r
a
i
l
a
n
d
Homeward Hills Road. In October of 1985 t
h
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
h
a
d
a
g
r
e
e
d
t
o
participate in the costs of installing a t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
;
t
h
e
r
e
f
o
r
e
,
the City will look to the new owners to
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
an agreement for their participation in the costs of the
s
i
g
n
a
l
,
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
f
i
n
a
l
p
l
a
t
release.
PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for pa
r
k
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
Developer's Agreement.
BONDING: Bonding will conform to City Cod
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
'
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the
f
i
n
a
l
p
l
a
t
o
f
E
d
e
n
P
o
i
n
t
e
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
the requirements of this report, the Deve
l
o
p
e
r
'
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
following:
1. Receipt of street lighting fee of $2,253.0
0
2. Receipt of engineering fee of $5,720.00
3. Receipt of street sign fee of $478.00
4. Receipt of agreement regarding cost parti
c
i
p
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
installation of traffic signal at pioneer
T
r
a
i
l
a
n
d
Homeward Hills Road.
5. Revision of plat to show easements over st
o
r
m
s
e
w
e
r
t
o
be City owned.
6. City Engineer's approval of final constr
u
c
t
i
o
n
p
l
a
n
s
for streets and utilities.
JJ:ss
CC: R. Neslund Company
Wehrman Consultants Associated, Inc.
Nancy Whaylen - Estes, Parsonen & Levy
Doug Hemer - Oppenheimer Law Firm
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE -
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 87-261
RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND
ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT
WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed to make the following
improvements:
I.C. 52-130 (STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS IN COLUMBINE ROAD)
and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the
improvements, pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Chapter 429.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council:
That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for
study with the assistance of B.R.W. INC., and that a feasibility
report shall be prepared and presented to the City Council with all
convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the
scope, cost assessment and feasibility of the proposed improvements.
ADOPTED BY the Eden Prairie City Council on SEPTEMBER 15, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
C17/ OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
To The Eden Prairie City Council:
The undersigned property Owners herein petition the Eden Prairie City
Council to consider making the following described improvementi(s)t
(General Location)
Sanitary Sewer
Watermain
Storm Sewer
Street Paving
Other
Street Address or Other
Legal Description of Names of Petitioners
Property to be Served
(Must Fie Property Owners)
Fl auslii-R__Ath.1e.1 -
755 Prairie Center Drive Signature
PrAixlm, mm c5244 44-r/ Rill Neel e--
2, SF 1/4 SF 1/4 C n 15,r116
R22,Portions of SW 1/4 SW 1/4, Signature ///'
F.rrin
S -14,T116, R22 4, Lloyd "a-no
'
(See attached proposed description)_(;,
•
rvteninn_rif rnlembirv, PO-AAto Prairj.e Cent
' DriN
(For City Use)
Date Received
Project No.
. ..Sse.7 .7r ,•?aez._ 3 , 9 0,7
- 13o
Council Consideration S'E",r4 94' 7
Especially for Children
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 38-87-PUD-8-87
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING ORDINANCE #21-86-P
U
D
-
2-86 AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AM
O
N
G
OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
m
a
d
e
a part hereof.
Section 2. That Ordinance #21-86-PUD-2-86 be amended by adding the
following:
"Section 3. That the plans dated June 19, 1986, reviewed and
approved by the City Council August 4, 1987, for Especially for
Children shall apply for that area within the PUD-2-Neighborhood-
Commercial District."
Section 3. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation"
a
n
d
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in
t
h
e
i
r
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on August 4, 1987, and finally read and adopted and ordered published
a
t
a
regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 15th day of September, 19
8
7
.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
.2 I
Exhibit A
Legal Description
Site Plan Review
Lot 19, Block 6, Hidden Glen 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
PUD District Review
All of Blocks 1-6, inclusive, and Outlots A-E, inclusive, Hidden
Glen 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Especially for Children
SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
This Supplement to Developer's Agreement made and entered into as of this
day of , 1987, by and between Especially for Children,
Inc., transferees of the property as described in the developer's agreement between
Derrick Land Company, a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, for
Hidden Glen North, dated June 17, 1986, hereinafter "Developer's Agreement," and the
City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City;"
WHEREAS, Especially for Children has succeeded to all of the rights and
interests in lands included within that portion of Hidden Glen North as described in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, previously owned by Derrick Land
Company; and,
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend said agreement for a portion of the
property referred to in said agreement, that portion of the property being described
in Exhibit A, attached hereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties thereto as follows:
1. The Developer's Agreement shall be and hereby is supplemented and amended in
the following respects:
A. Paragraph 1. shall be amended to read as follows:
Owner shall develop the property in conformance with the revised
material dated June 19, 1987, reviewed and approved as amended by
the City Council cn August 4, 1987, and attached hereto as Exhibit
A, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein.
B. Paragraph 7. shall be amended by adding:
Prior to issuance of any building permit on the property, Developer
agrees to submit to the Director of Planning, and to obtain the
Director's approval of a revised landscape plan with a fence detail
depicting commercial grade construction with three-quarter-
inch ( 3/4-inch) treated wood material, and depicting the that all
fenceposts shall be sunken into concrete footings.
C. Paragraph 12. shall be added as follows:
Prior to issuance of any building permit on the property, Developer
agrees to submit to the Director of Planning, and to obtain the
Director's approval of a cross access and maintenance agreement for
the common driveway between the property and the Townline Square
shopping center to the north. Developer agrees to file said
agreement with Hennepin County and to provide proof of filing of
said agreement to the City prior to issuance of any occupancy permit
for the property.
2. Especially for Children, Inc., agrees to all of the terms and conditions and
accepts the obligations of the "Owner" under the Developer's Agreement, as
amended and supplemented herein.
Especially for Children
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-247
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE 38-87-PUD-8-87 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 38-87-PUD-8-87 was adopted and ordered published at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 15th day of
September, 1987;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 38-87-PUD-8-87, which
is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that
said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of
said ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 38-87-PUD-8-87 shall be recorded in the ordinance
book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B
herein, within 20 days after said publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on September 15, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
_
Especially for Children
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 38-87-PUD-8-87
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
IMPLY: This Ordinance allows amendment within the PUD-2-86- Neighborhood-Commercial District for land located south of Townline Rod, east of
Dell Road, for construction of a day care facility, subject to the terms and
conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance,
gives the full legal description of this property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
/s/John D. Frane
City Clerk /s/Gary D. Peterson
Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1987.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
" A.0
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-259
RESOLUTION RECEIVING 100% PETITION,
ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS & PREPARATION
OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
I.C. 52-129
WYNDHAM CREST
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council:
1. The owners of 100% of the real property abutting upon and to be
benefitted from the proposed street and utitity improvements
have petitioned the City Council to construct said improvements
and to assess the entire cost against their property.
2. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, and upon recommendation of the
City Engineer, said improvements are hereby ordered and the City
Engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for said improvements
In accordance with City Standards and advertise for bids thereon,
with the assistance of RCM, INC.
3. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the City Clerk is hereby
directed to publish a copy of this resolution once in the official
newspaper, and further a contract for construction of said improve-
ments shall not be approved by the City Council prior to 30 days
following publication of this Resolution in the City's official
newspaper.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on SEPTEMBER 15, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, CTerk
CITY OF EDEN MAME, MlNNESOTA
100‘ PET1TlON FOR LOCAL )MPROVEmrNTS
TO THE EDEN PRAIRIE cITY COUNCIL:
The undersi g ned are all the fee owners of the real prOpert y dePciiheri .
below and herein petition for the Eden Prairie Cit y C ouncil to pinceed
with makin g the followin g described improvements,
(General Location)
X Sanitar y Sewer
X Watermain
X Storm Sewer
Wyndham Crest
Wyndham Crest
Wyndham Crest
X street Pavin g . Wyndham Crest
Other
Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the undersi g ned hereb y waive an y
public hearin g to be held on said improvements, and further stat,' and
a g ree that the total cost of.said improvements shall be speciall y as-
sessed a g ainst the p r opert y described below in accordance with the
City's special assessment policies. We further understand that the
preliminary, estimated total cost for the said improvements is 237,700_ .
Kdrien "B'
Street Address or other Le g al Names and addresses of Fetitioners
Description of Pro p ert y to be Served (Must be owners of 1,•cnid)
-New -eoncept Homes -
Attached Addendum "A" 10340 Viking Dr.f
,.#
Joseph Dolesji /
9005 Riley Lake Dr. E.P.
( )2-7/4
7.1NR Land Co.,Atth;John H. Ramstead
jba-lnd Ave. So.f405,elas,_Ea,_5 5402
(Tor City une)
Date eceived
ra oject No.
("“unri) rowciArtmtion 4!---7-i".
ADDENDUM "A"
Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of
said Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South
89 degrees 14 minutes 14 seconds West along the South line
of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance
of 110.89 feet; thence Nw:th 0 degrees 07 minutes 05 seconds
West a distance of 385.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 18
minutes 33 seconds East a distance of 515.00 feet; thence
South 52 degrees 05 minutes 49 seconds East a distance of
504.72 feet; thence South 36 degrees 13 minutes 43 seconds
East a distance of 86.02 feet to the South line of the Northwest
Quarter of said Northeast Qudrter; thence South 89 degrees
for 18 minutes 33 seconds West along the South line of said
Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 852.44
feet to the point of beginning.
The North half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter of Section 6, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County,
Minnnesota.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE 48-87
BE IT ORDAINED by the Eden Prairie City Council that the following
street shall be renamed:
FROM: APPALOOSA LANE
TO: TREE FARM ROAD
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Eden Prairie on SEPTEMBER 15, 1987 and finally read, adopted
and ordered published at a regular meeting of the Council of said
City on the OCTOBER 6, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
2q,).)
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, P.E.
Director of Public Works
DATE: September 10, 1987
SUBJECT: Ordinance 48-87
Street Name Change
Attached is a letter requesting a street name
c
h
a
n
g
e
f
r
o
m
A
p
p
a
l
o
o
s
a
Lane to Tree Farm Road. The Mogush family, who
i
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
street name change, would be the first residen
t
s
o
n
t
h
i
s
r
o
a
d
.
T
h
e
Developer, Countryside Investments, Inc., does
n
o
t
h
a
v
e
a
n
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
to the change. A public hearing would not be r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
s
i
n
c
e
n
o
o
n
e
is presently living on this road.
It is recommended that this change be approved
b
y
t
h
e
M
a
y
o
r
a
n
d
City Council.
EAD:ss
•?att uor izbE\ rvylo Put.nar-ronia) 'n ' F)170 rukyp:4 WL 1VGIJU iK?illr) Cf. _rhornirp uo urr 09- n ()Nit' 4-1601 F.-nolo)2J f Iv', XI') I rotIr -ay+ rv0 row, oir -mar r\rno rArrs lAtt-114mm iTP2'1) riparyxinTcorvatamwt, (-7;kau o awyr. ffit,or, en ckw rtry, 16kirorcui pro-Te Ova/7 moor* rpn-Ufai rurmr- mar 4-M1)14- rirri0 fat. rrurvQf '773-ird r\v/r3 rUirl rOWP r\-W1110-1 '11-0Ar‘ p (CnAr1271 gliC0 UT gruff rt1 WrprinT 'WV G rrXta) T-E'() Irpworr tzi.05p-tt-1! ;!JT-Jd Q173 9°M 3.9 J9pPi Zp ;Xi a-D L Sbl 21 4-s-PCT
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
VAC 87-08
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-258
VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS
ON LOTS 1 & 3, BLOCK 1 AND LOTS 2 & 3, BLOCK 1
PRAIRIE VIEW CENTER
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain drainage and utility easements
described as follows:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 15, 1987 after due notice
was published and posted as required by law;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said easements are not necessary
and have no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
1. Said drainage and utility easements as above described are hereby
vacated.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of the pro-
ceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 21, 1987.
ATTEST:
SEAL
JiiKn D. Frane, Clerk
The 5.00 foot drainage and utility easements originally dedicated on the
recorded plat of Prairie View Center across the following described
property.
Lots 1 & 3, Block 1, PRAIRIE VIEW CENTER,
Said easements lie within 5.00 feet of a line described as follows:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot 3; thence on
an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 29 minutes 08 seconds
West along the north line of said Lot 3 a distance of 15.00
feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described;
thence continuing South 89 degrees 29 minutes 08 seconds
West along said north line, a distance of 200.00 feet to the
Northwest corner of said Lot 3, thence South 0 degrees 30
minutes 52 seconds East along the wet line of said Lot 3 a
distance of 91.07 feet and said line there terminating.
The 5.00 foot drainage and utility esements originally dedicated on the
recorded plat of PRAIRIE VIEW CENTER across the following described
property.
Lots 2 & 3, Block 1, PRAIRIE VIEW CENTER,
Said easements lie within 5.00 feet of a line described as follows:
Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence on
an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 29 minutes 08 seconds
West along the north line of said Lot 2 a distance of 15.00
feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described;
thence continuing South 89 degrees 29 minutes 08 seconds
West along said north line a distance of 195.00 feet and
said line there terminating.
EXHIBIT A
'
SEPTEMBER .15 9 1987
36019
37071
37118
f 122
k 169
37179
37202
37203
37204
37205
37206
37207
37208
37209
37210
37211
37212
37213
37214
37215
37216
37217
37218
37219
37220
37221
37222
37223
37224
( '25
26
37227
37228
37229
37230
37231
37232
37233
37234
37235
37236
37237
37238
37239
37240
37241
37242
37243
37244
37245
37246
37247
37248
37249
75 0
VOID OUT CHECK
VOID OUT CHECK
VOID OUT CHECK
VOID OUT CHECK
VOID OUT CHECK
VOID OUT CHECK
EDEN PRAIRIE APPLIANCE
HOPKINS POSTMASTER
LANCE
LEE SCHNEIDER
HOPKINS POSTMASTER
NORTHERN STATES POWER
SQUARE CUT
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
THE GREAT-WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO
ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION
PERA
UNITED WAY
NORWEST RUE(
CITY-COUNTY CREDIT UNION
SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK
QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS COMPANY
CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO
EAGLE WINE CO
THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
PRIOR WINE CO
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQ
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NSF
AMY ABBATE
KATHY DORFNER
NANCY GAGNER
SANDY KNAAK
SANDY KNAAK
RENEE OLSON
JANICE ROLFE
MARK WIDSTEN
MARK WIDSTEN
JOSEPH K DOLEJSI
JASON NORTHCO PROPERTIES
MN BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHSION
TELECONFERENCING HEADQUARTERS
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
GRIGGS COOPER & COMPANY
JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO
MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE
VOID OUT CHECK
DISHWASHER REPAIRS-FIRE DEPT
POSTAGE FOR POSTAGE METER
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
POSTAGE-SENIOR NEWSLETTER
SERVICE
CABINETS-FIRE DEPT
PAYROLL 8-21-87
PAYROLL 8-21-87
PAYROLL 8-21 -87
PAYROLL 8-21-87
PAYROLL 8-2" -87
PAYROLL 8-21-87
PAYROLL 8-21-87
PAYROLL 8-21-87
PAYROLL 8-21-87
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICES
REFUND ON SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND ON SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND ON SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND ON DAY CAMP
REFUND ON HORSEBACK RIDING
REFUND ON SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND ON SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND ON HORSEBACK RIDING
REFUND ON DAY CAMP
LAND FOR WYNDAM KNOLL PARK
SEPTEMBER RENT-LIQUOR STORE
CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT
CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
BASIC LIFE INS PREMIUMS-JULY TO SEPT
9.00-
77.64-
144.90-
433.50-
14.00-
83.47-
75.85
5000.00
144.90
14.00
37.58
178.76
785.00
44065.20
11493.61
4176.00
865.00
21423.93
158.88
800.00
724.13
200.00
1400.67
580.18
12.44
36.20
1738.62
937.04
2823.71
4370.07
999.26
256.00
23817.99
284.40
93.03
16.00
16.00
9.25
32.40
9.00
13.00
7.50
12.00
45.00
24820.95
5339.21
100.00
90.00
450.33
2375.68
4065.31
3369.02
2504.31
6329.76
0.00
1(6 3 3 4 66
d'ioq
37251
37252
37253
(
-254
255
37256
37257
37258
37259
37260
37261
37262
37263
37264
37265
37266
37267
37268
37269
37270
37271
37272
37273
37274
37275
37276
37277
37278
37279
80
AT & T
AT & T
AT & T
MINNEGAsCo
NSF
NORTHWESTERN BELL
POWER PROCESS EQUIPMENT
PETTY CASH
DANA GIBBS
HoPKINS POSTMASTER
VOID OUT CHECK
MENARDS
LARKSTUR ENGINEERING & SUPPLY INC
SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTERPRISES INC
HOPKINS POSTMASTER
WILLIAM CARRANE
JANET M HENRIKSEN
LINDA ROLF
MINNESOTA ASPA
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
TWENTIETH ANNIVERSARY PARTY
A & H WELDING & MFG CO
A TO Z RENTAL CENTER
ACRO-MINNESOTA INC
AIRSIGNAL INC
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CORPORATION
AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO
CAYTE ANDERSON
EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOC IgC
37281 ANDERSON GARDEN sHoPpE
37282 PETER ANDERSON
37283 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC
37284 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC
37285 BRUCE BENNER
37286 BENTEC ENGINEERING CORP
37287 BIFFS INC
37288 BLACK & VEATCH
37289 ISAAC RANSOM BLAKEY
37290 BMB SERVICES
37291 RICK BOLINSKE
37292 LEE BRANDT
37293 ED BRION
37294 BRO-TEN INC
37295 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC
37296 BSC MECHANICAL onucroRs
37297 BSN CORPORATION
37298 NATHAN BUCK
37299 JOHN BULTMAN
37 300 TIM BUSHNELL
7"01 CARBURETION & TURBO SYSTEMS INC
1279350
SEPTEMBER .15,1987
90.44
831.75
59.10
3.00
7230.14
90.72
100.00
54.92
65.00
172.78
0.00
94.19
292.00
4383.39
543.06
20.00
2.00
25.50
55.00
12.64
1.78
30.00
20.00
270.30
214.33
80.00
119.06
9.05
90.90
30500.00
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
REGISTRATION-WATER DEPT
PETTY CASH
PACKET DELIVERIES
POSTAGE-FALL BROCHURE
SUPPLIES-PARK MAINTENANCE
HYDRAULIC HOSE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
SEPTEMBER RENT-LIQUOR STORE
POSTAGE-UTILITY BILLING
REFUND-PHYSICAL FITUESS CLASS
REFUND-E(ERCISE CLASS
REFUND-SINGLE MEMBERSHIP
CONFERENCE-ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER
SERVICES
SERVICE
REGISTRATION-CITY MANAGER/MAYOR
STEEL-WATER DEPT
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-STORM DAMAGE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SERVICE
EXPENSES-CITY HALL
TOWELS-LIQUOR STORE
TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES
-PLAYSTRUCTURE -EDENBROoK PARK & LAKE EDEN
PARK
PLANTS-PARK MAINTENANCE 20.00 TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 22.05 BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE 568.32 -BATTERIES/SPARK PLUGS/WINDSHIELD WASHER
805.92 -FLUID/SEALS/BEARINGS/ROTOR & HUB/FLASHERS/
TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
MILEAGE 154.50 INSTALLATION OF POWER MONITOR-LIFTSTATIONS
1967.79 PORTABLE RESTROOMS 150.00 SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDITION
11577.16 SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 1131.00 -EQUIPMENT INSTALLED IN FITNESS CENTER-
391.10 COMMUNITY CENTER
SUPPLIES-COMMIT? CENTER 38.87 SERVICE-4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION
140.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 29.00 TOWELS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
125.60 BLACKTOP-STREET DEPT & PARK DEPT 968.76 REPLACED A/C COMPRESSOR-COMMUNITY CENTER
7510.94 SUPPLIES FOR PRESCHOOL PRCGRAMs 198.44 SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 536.50 SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 942.50 HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 18.00 ZAMBONI REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER
36.00
Qq0 116
SEPTEMBER 15,1987
37302 DANIEL J CARLSON
37303 cARLsoN REFRIGERATION CO INC
37304 CARMICHAEL-LYNCH ADVERTISING
f 305 CEDAR HILLS GOLF COURSE
\ 306 CENTURION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC
37307 CERTIFIED RUSTPROOFERS INC
37308 CHANHASSEN LAW & SPORTS
37309 CITY OF CHASKA
37310 ?WOUND CHEHRENEGAR
37311 CLIMATE MAKERS INC
37312 CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SER INC
37313 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
37314 COMMUNICATION WORLD
37315 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER
37316 ROBERT W cOMpTON INC
37317 COPY EQUIPMENT INC
37318 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CO
37319 CRYSTAPLEx PLASTICS INC
37320 CURTIS INDUSTRIES
37321 CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS INC
57322 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY
37323 DALCO
17324 LINDA DALY
25 DENISON MAILING SERVICE
326 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
37327 DICTAPHONE
37328 MICHAEL DIKO
37329 DIRECT SAFETY Co
37330 DIXIE PErRO-CHEM INC
37331 KATIE DoNAvoN
37332 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU
37333 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU
37334 BETH DURRE
37335 DUSTCOATING INC
37336 EAGLE SNACKS INC
37337 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
37338 EDEN PRAIRIE VOLUNTEER RELIEF
37339 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPT
37340 E P GROCERY
37341 E P PHOTO
37342 E P ROBINS DELI
37343 EDEN PRAIRIE SNOWDRIFTERS
37344 EDEN PRAIRIE TRASHIRONICs
37345 ERICA EDSTROM
37346 ELECTRIC SERVICE CO
37347 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS
37348 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC
7-1 49 JON B ELVY
11467398
MEETING EXPENSES 28.00 BEER COOLER REPAIRS-LIQUOR STORE 315.52 SERVICE-PARK BOARD REFERENDUM SURVEY 300.00 GOLF LESSONS/FEES PAID 107.50 SET UP SQUAD CARS-POLICE DEPT 2116.00 RUSTPROOFING-POLICE DEPT 135.00 -SCREWS/OIL MIX/PARTS-PARKS DEFT& WATER 63.75 DEPT
GOLF LESSONS/FEES PAID 182.00 MILEAGE 145.25 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER 389.25 -CORE/BRAKE CHAMBER WITH TUBE/KIT/PLATE/ 853.79 WHEEL CYLINDER/SPRING BRAKES
SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW ROAD 3211.58 CAR PHONE-CITY MANAGER 935.00 -SPEAKER MICROPHONES FOR PORTABLE RADIOS- 440.00 POLICE DEPT
SERVICE-HOMEWARD HILLS PARK 4795.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS-ENGINEERING DEPT 56.80 -NAME PLATES-ASSESSING DEPT & ENGINEERING 30.40 DEPT
HOCKEY NETS-ICE ARENA 220.00 -WIRE/WASHER SCREWS/DRILL BITS-EQUIPMENT 290.84 MAINTENANCE
INSTALLED WATER TANK- FIRE DEPT 4710.00 QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 5041.87 -CLEANING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER & 352.59 PUBLIC SAFETY & WATER DEPT
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 145.00 POSTAGE-ASSESSING DEPT 130.50 HEALTH CODE CITATION-FIRE DEPT 110.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT 493.00 HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 53.00 SIGNS-WATER DEPT 45.20 CHLORINE-WATER DEPT 820.00 TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 26.77 EXPENSES-STORM DAMAGE 1349.46 EXPENSES-STORM DAMAGE 30.54 TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 33.00 OIL FOR DUST CONTROL-STREET MAINTENANCE 1782.00 SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 21.12 CHAMBER DINNER MEETING-COUNCILMEMBERS 47.00 FIRE STATE AID CONTRIBUTION 81338.00 -SUPPLIES/DUES/STORM DAMAGE/CONFERENCE- 699.28 FIRE DEPT
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT & STORM DAMAGE 54.19 PHOTO SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 37.61 MEETING EXPENSE-HUMAN RESOURCE 13.50 GRANT FOR SNOWMOBILE TRAILS 856.37 AUGUST '87 TRASH DISPOSAL 365.00 TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 84.60 EQUIPMENT REPAIR-CIVIL DEFENSE 985.00 CULVERTS-DRAINAGE CONTROL 348.55 SAFETY SUPPLIES- WATER DEPT 19.15 HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 66.00
02ti c
SEPTEMBER 35,1987
37350 EMERGENCY SERVICE SYSTEMS INC
37351 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC
37352 LIDN EVE & SONS
" *353 FACILITY SYSTEMS INC
, 354 THE FAMILY DIGEST
37355 JOHN M FERN
37356 FINLEY BROS ENTERPRISES
37357 FITNESS ASSOCIATES INC
37358 FLEET MAINTENANCE INC
37359 FLYING CLOUD SANITARY LANDFILL
37360 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY
37361 JOHN FRANE
37362 G & K SERVICES
37363 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC
37364 JOSEPH GLEASON
37365 GOODYEAR TRUCK TIRE CENTERS
37366 R L GOULD & CO INC
37367 ALAN GRAY
37368 GROSS OFFICE SUPPLY
37369 MACH CO
37370 HALE COMPANY INC
37371 JAMES HALE
37372 HAYDEN MURPHY EQUIPMENT CO
37373 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC
)1374 HENNEPIN CTY CHIEFS OF POLICE
37375 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
37376 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
37377 HENNEPIN COUNTY
37378 HEWN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT
37379 HOFFERS INC
37380 HONEYWELL PROTECTION
37381 HOPKINS PLUMBING & HEATING CO
37382 DONNA HYATT
37383 HYDRO ENGINEERING INC
37384 IBM
37385 INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING SUPPLY INC
37386 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC
37387 INTL SOCIETY OF FIRE
37388 LORI JOHNSON
37389 JYLAND HOMES
37390 KEITH KAPITAN
37391 KAYE CORPORATION
37392 KRUEGER APPRAISALS INC
37393 LABEL PRODUCTS INC
37394 ROBERT LAMBERT
37395 LANCE
37396 TERRI LANGER
KERMIT LAQUAY
4087752
REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - POLICE DEPT
CULVERTS-DRAINAGE CONTROL
BALES OF HAY-STORM DAMAGE
SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
AD-LIQUOR STORE
MILEAGE
SOFTBALL BACKSTOP-PARKS DEPT
STRESS TESTS-FIRE DEPT
PARTS-PARKS DEPT
WASTE DISPOSAL-TREE REMOVAL
SUPPLIES- LIQUOR STORES
JUNE '87 EXPENSES
-TOWELS/COVERALLS-PARKS DEPT/WATER DEPT/
LIQUOR STORE
-RADIO REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND
POLICE DEPT
SOFTBALL & FOOTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
HYDRAULIC HOSE-PARK MAINTENANCE
AUGUST '87 EXPENSES
OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT& FIRE DEPT
CHEMICALS/LAB EQUIPMENT-WATER DEPT
EQUIPMENT REPAIRS DUE TO STORM DAMAGE
GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-STORM DAMAGE
-SERVICE-PIONEER TRAIL & COUNTY RD 18/
-NEMEC KNOLLS/INT'L SCHOOLS WATERMAIN/
-SUNNYBROOK ROAD/BLUFFS EAST 4TH ADDITION/
-BLUFFS WEST VICINITY STORM SEWER/HOMEWARD
HILLS PARK/EDEN LAKE PARK/WILLOW PARK
CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT
GRASS SEED-STORM DAMAGE
SERVICE-PLANNING DEPT & ENGINEERING DEPT
JULY '87 BOARD OF PRISONERS
JULY '87 BOOKING FEE
SOFTBALL FIELD MARKING-PARKS DEPT
3RD QUARTER SECURITY SERVICE-LIQUOR STORE
EQUIPMENT REPAIRS-WATER DEPT
MILEAGE
PARTS-STORM DAMAGE
OCTOBER '87 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
LIGHT BULBS-WATER DEPT
-AUGUST '87 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HAL
& POLICE DEPT
BOCKS-FIRE DEPT
SKATING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
REFUND-BLDG PERMIT
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
PARTS-PARK MAINTENANCE
SERVICE
LABELS-POLICE DEPT
AUGUST '87 EXPENSES
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES
REFUND-DUPLICATE PAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL
24.65
188.00
73.50
210.60
45.00
111.13
950.00
280.00
4.20
12.70
966.07
165.00
313.66
320.14
442.00
79.96
38.59
165.00
485.54
1199.71
1225.25
216.00
1930.00
23075.13
215.00
84.75
179.59
2190.25
373.84
441.25
392.77
43.25
13.00
14.45
424.32
113.40
198.25
49.95
319.48
300.00
87.00
2.88
1800.00
552.54
268.00
99.85
104.40
87.47
024/Oci
COVERALLS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 52.50
LEGAL SERVICE 8935.10
NOZZLES-WATER DEPT 54.32
LIABILITY INSURANCE 39847.00 -DOOR BRACE/SHANK-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & 156.23
PARKS DEPT
EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 28.50
-RESCUE EQUIPMENT & 1ST AID SUPPLIES- 1721.43 FIRE DEPT
-MEMBERSHIP DUES-ASSISTANT TO THE CITY 25.00
MANAGER
EXPENSES-STORM DAMAGE 13.42
4TH QUARTER SUBSCRIPTION-ASSESSING DEPT 44.00
-COMPRESSION TESTER/WRENCHES/HACK SAW- 126.50 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
TOWING SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 35.00 EXPENSES-CITY HALL & PUBLIC SAFETY 116.93
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 34.26
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 12.00
EQUIPMENT REPAIRS-0YOUNITY CENTER 134.37
OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT 46.50
MEETING EXPENSES-CITY MANAGER 8.00 AIR COMPRESSOR PARTS-FIRE DEPT 1020.12
SEPTEMBER '87 PAGER SERVICE-SEWER DEPT 10.50 FORMS-POLICE DEPT 1338.00
-CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-ROUND LAKE PARK 233.10 & COMMUNITY CENTER
BLACKTOP-DRAINAGE CONTROL
72.20 SUBSCRIPTION-ASSESSING DEPT
50.00
2 MAGNIFIER LAMPS-FIRE DEPT
220.00 SERVICE
56.33
0.00 SERVICE
50.47 SERVICE
147.00
-AUGUST & SEPTEMBER '87 PAGER SERVICE- 103.00 WATER DEPT
SEPTEMBER 15,1987
37398 LEEF BROS INC
37399 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC
37400 F B LEOPOLD COMPANY INC
101 LMCIT
',.402 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR
37403 TRACY J LUKE
37404 LYNN CORPORATION
37405 MAUMA
37406 MARK'S EDEN PRAIRIE AMOCO
37407 MARSHALL AND SWIFT
37408 MAC TOOLS
37409 MATTS AUTO SERVICE INC
37410 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC
37411 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC
37412 TIM MCGOVERN
37413 MCQUIRE & SONS PLEG & HTG
37414 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO
37415 METROPOLITAN AREA MANAGERS ASSOC
37416 METROPOLITAN FIRE EQUIP CO
37417 METRO FONE COMM INC
37418 mErrio PRINTING INC
37419 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO
37420 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
27 421 MINNEAPOLIS BOARD OF REALTORS
22 MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT
.D(423 MN CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO
37424 VOID OUT CHECK
37425 MN CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO
37426 MN CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO
37427 MINNESOTA COMMUNICATIONS CORP
37428 MINNESOTA COMMUNICATIONS CORP -AUGUST & SEPTEMBER '87 PAGER SERVICE-
POLICE DEPT
37429 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY HELMET/FOAM NOZZLE-FIRE DEPT
37430 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC AD-LIQUOR STORE
37431 R G MODEEN INC PAINT CAR WASH BAY-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
37432 MODERN ELECTRIC GRINDER REPAIRS-PARKS DEPT
37433 MODERN TIRE CO TIRE REPAIRED-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
37434 D J MOLINE COMPANY AD-LIQUOR STORE
37435 MOON VALLEY AGGREGATES SAND-STORM DAMAGE
37436 MOTOROLA INC RADIO REPAIRS-FIRE DEPT
37437 NM MUELLER & SONS INC SAND-PARK MAINTENANCE
37438 MUNICILITE CO STROBE FLASHERS FOR EDUCTOR -SEWER DEPT
37439 MY CHEESE SHOP EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
37440 NATIONAL SCREENPRINT T-SHIRTS-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
37441 NATIONAL ASSN. OF POLICE PLANNERS MEMBERSHIP DUES-POLICE DEPT
37442 NEWVECTOR RETAIL SERVICE INC RADIO REPAIRS-FIRE DEPT
37443 NORWEST BANK MPLS NA BOND PAYMENTS
37444 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC TYPEWRITER REPAIRS-ASSESSING DEPT
- 45 ORKIN PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL-FIRE DEPT
160.00
630.00
121.02
690.00
45.50
18.00
150.00
84.00
246.48
129.77
819.63
23.81
178.40
20.00
704.00
147248.20
170.00
402.00
20653259
SEPTEMBER .15,1987
37456 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
37457 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
PAGER SERVICE-POLICE DEPT
SERVICE-ENTERTAINMENT AT SENIOR CENTER
FILM PROCESSING-FORESTRY DEPT
POSTAGE METER RENTAL-CITY HALL
SEPTEMBER '87 JANITORIAL SERVICE-CITY HALL
METER COVER-WATER DEPT
-DRILL BITS/AXE HANDLE/TAPE/HANGERS/RUST-
-OLEUM/PAINT/PAINT BRUSHES/SHEETING/
COOLERS/HINGE-FIRE DEPT
-BATTERIES/PHONE CORD/COUPLINGS/ADAPTORS-
CITY HALL
-VARNISH/SANDPAPER/PAINTBRUSHES/SANDING
-BELT/STAPLES/NAILS/PAINT/BATTERIES/KEYS
-CUT/KEY CHAINS/RUBBER GLOVES/FAN/CORDS/
-TAPE/SHOWER LINE/ANTI-FREEZE/DEDUCT TAPE/
-SPARK PLUGS/DRILL BITS/HOOKS/DOOR STOP/
-NUTS/BOLTS/INSECT REPELLANT/SCREWS/
WASHERS-COMMUNITY CENTER
PAPER/WIRE CLIPS/LIGHT BULBS-LIQUOR STORE
-PAINT BRUSHES/VARNISH/PAINT/INSECT REPELL
-ANT/WIRE/NUTS/SAND BELT/BOLTS/RAKE/
_CHEMICAL SPRAYER/MOP/KEYS CUT/BRASS
FITTINGS/RUSTOLEUM-PARKS DEPT
-KEYS CUT/KEY RINGS/UTILITY KNIFE/STAPLES/
-STAPLE GUN/DUST PAN/BROOM/SIGNS/LETTERS/
OUTLET COVER/SCREEN-POLICE DEPT
-NUTS/BOLTS/GLOVES/BATTERIES/KEYS-
SEWER DEPT
-CHAIN/PAINT THINNER/CABLE CLAMPS/WASTE-
BASKET/HCOKS/PAPER PRODUCTS/KEYS/SAND MIX
-TAPE/PLUGS/WEATHER STRIP/HAMMER/BROOMS/
-NOZZLES/BATTERIES/BROOM HANDLE/BRUSHES/
FLASHLIGHTS/WRENCH-WATER DEPT
PRINTING-PLANNING DEPT
BOOK-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT
PRINTING-SENIOR CENTER
EXPENSES-STREET DEPT
TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES
ZAMBONI REPAIRS-COMMUMITY CENTER
EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER
CASH REGISTER TAPE-LIQUOR STORE
3RD QUARTER DISPATCH SERVICE
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
VALVE-FIRE DEPT
-TRANSMITTER BATTERY & BATTERY CHARGER-
FIRE DEPT
SERVICES-HOMEWARD HILLS PARK
ALTERNATOR & PARTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
PORTABLE RESTROOMS-PARK MAINTENANCE
EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-SQUAD CAR BODY REPAIRS-$1603.04/REMOVED
-DECALS & LETTERING-$105.00/WHEEL ALIGNMENT-
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
37446 PAGENET
37447 VOID OUT CHECK
37448 BOB PAYTON
/ 449 PHOTOS INC
k 450 PITNEY BOWES
37451 PMS SERVICE CORP
37452 POWER PROCESS EQUIPMENT INC
37453 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
37454 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
37455 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
37458 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
37459 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
50 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
37461 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
37462 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING
37463 PRENTICE-HALL INC
37464 PRINT SHACK
37465 JERRY PRODOEHL
37466 JOSHUA PUTKA
37467 R & R SPECIALTIES INC
37468 RED OWL STORES INC
37469 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS OF MN
37470 CITY OF RICHFIELD
37471 KAREN ROACH
37472 ROAD RESCUE INC
37473 ROBOTRONICS INC
37474 ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS
37475 ROGER'S SERVICE
37476 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS INC
37477 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES INC
37478 MITCHELL SCHNEIDER
37479 RICK SCHOEN
37480 SHAKOPEE FORD INC
465.86
0.00
75.00
17.55
96.75
1160.00
150.00
306.39
27.46
253.48
15.29
248.01
87.55
46.56
135.72
180.95
41.20
80.45
179.80
8.00
122.85
53.25
58.00
121.17
19910.91
29.00
6.33
69.90
420.00
220.30
95.80
582.86
4.76
66.00
2445.24
2778239
37481 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO
37482 SMOKE EATERS
37483 SNYDERS DRUG STORES INC
Ar '484 SODERQUIST SERVICES INC
485 =mug PLUMBING INC
37486 SOUTHWEST AUTO SUPPLY INC
37487 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
37488 SOU'THWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
37489 SOUTHWEST TRAILS ASSOCIATION
37490 STANDARD SPRING CO
37491 STATE OF MINNESOTA
37492 JILL STEVENSON
37493 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
37494 SULLIVANS SERVICES INC
37495 SUPERIOR PLASTICS CORP
37496 SUPPLEE ENTERPRISES INC
( '97 VOID OUT CHECK
TARGET 220
37499 TASTE OF ITALY
37500 TAYLOR SALES INC
37501 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
37502 U S WEST CELLULAR INC
37503 HOLLY VAN DORN
37504 VESSCO INC
37505 VIKING LABORATORIES
37506 KARI A WAIL
37507 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP CO
37508 KEITH WALL
37509 CHERYL WALTERS
37510 WARNING LITES
37511 WATER PRODUCTS CO
37512 WATERITE INC
37513 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY
37514 STEPHEN J WHITE
37515 WILSON TANNER GRAPHICS
37516 TOM vaLsoN
889151
RECORDER REPAIRS-POLICE DEPT 68.00
SUBSCRIPTIONS-FIRE DEPT 21.00
-FILM DEVELOPED/BATTERIES/TAPE/PAPER/ 74.40
-SPONGES/COTTON BALLS/CLOTHES PINS/BALLOONS
TACKS-COMMMUNITY CENTER
SERVICE-FORESTRY DEPT 145.75 -PLUMBING MATERIALS NEEDED DUE TO STORM 522.79
DAMAGE
-CARBURETOR KIT/MUFFLER/HAND CLEANER/HITCH 2767.25
-WIRE TIES/BATTERIES/HOSES/BELTS/BRAKE
-LINES/IGNITIONS/AIR HOSE/WELD ROD/AIR
-FITTINGS/BATTERY CLEANER/SPARK PLUGS/
-GASKETS/DISC/BRAKE CLIPS/CARBURETOR GORES
-SPRAY BOTTLE/WATER PUMP/U-JOINT/GREASE
-HOSE/GREASE GUNS/SHOCKS/TEMPERATURE
CONTROL
EMPLOYMENT AD-FINANCE DEPT 51.15
ADS-LIQUOR STORE 223.56
SNOWMOBILE TRAIL GRANT 795.01
REPAIR CAR SEAT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 316.00
-AIR TANK EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE- 15.00
FIRE STATION
TEEN VOLUNTEER WAGES 83.92
-REPAIRED FLEX PLATE/REPLACED STARTER 492.40
-MIVE/FLY1ANIEL/DRIVE ASSEMBLY/GRILL-
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
PUMP TANK-SENIOR CENTER 56.00
-0-RINGS/COUPLINGS/PVC CEMENT/PRIMER- 65.06
WATER DEPT
-EXTENSION CORDS/INSECT REPELLANT-STORM 203.12
DAMAGE & PARKS DEPT
0.00
POOL SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
25.73
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
33.92
FREEZER REPAIRS-COMMUNITY MITER
35.00
OXYGEN-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
17.99
SERVICE
197.15
SUPPLIES-DAY CAMP
62.83
SEALS-WATER DEPT
20.30
CHEMICALS-COMMUNITY CENTER
34.03
MILEAGE
57.25
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-STORM DAMAGE
510.00
MEMBERSHIP DUES-POLICE DEPT
50.00
SUPPLIES-PLAYGROUND PROGRAM
11.40
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-STORM DAMAGE
135.40 -EQUIPMENT RENTAL DUE TO STORM DAMAGE- 777.98 $450.00/VALVES/GASKETS/BOLTS-WATER DEPT
POOL SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
46.41 TRAINING MANUALS-POLICE DEPT
185.00
EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
7.41 -PLAQUES/MEDALLIONS-YOUTH TENNIS PROGRAMS/
623.50 -BUSINESS CARDS-CITY HALL/ENVELOPES-
UTILITY BILLING
MILEAGE EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
164.00
;?tioc-i G-
SEPTEMBER .15,1987
-SOCKEY BOARD/PAR TABLE GOLF/MARBLE FOOT-
-BALL/BUMPER PUCK SET-SUMMER PLAYGROUND/
SPECIAL EVENTS/WARNING HOUSE ACTIVITIES
JULY '87 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT
TENNIS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
1ST AID SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
SUBSCRIPTION-PLANNING DEPT
SERVICE-1987 SEAL COATING
SERVICE-SUNNYBROOK& NEMEC KNOLLS
SERVICE-BENNETT PLACE & BLOSSUM ROAD
SERVICE-BLUFFS EAST 4TH ADDITION
SERVICE-BAKER ROAD
SERVICE-RIVERVIEW ROAD
SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDITION
SERVICE-BLUFFS WEST STORM SEWER
-SERVICE-PRAIRIE VIEW DRIVE & ST ANDREW
DRIVE
SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW ROAD
SERVICE-HOMEWARD HILLS ROAD
SERVICE-COUNTY ROAD 4 TO MITCHELL ROAD
SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDITION
DOOR REPAIRS-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER
-COMPRESSION TESTER/WRENCHES/HACK SAW/
PLIERS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
37517 VAORLD WIDE GAMES
if -518 XEROX CORP
k. 319 STEVE YIE
37520 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
37521 VOID OUT CHECK
37522 ZONING BULLETIN BIWEEKLY
37523 ALLIED BLACKTOP CO
37524 BROWN & CRIS INC
37525 BROWN & CRIS INC
37526 KENKO INC
375 27 WITEMES CONSTRUCTION
37528 JP NOREX INC
375 29 JP NOREX INC
37530 JP NOREX INC
37531 NORT1EALE CONSTRUCTION CO
37532 PREFERRED PAVING INC
37533 RICE LAKE CONTRACTING
37534 SHAFER CONTRACTING INC
37535 SHAW-LUNDQUIST ASSOC INC
37536 AIRLIFT DOORS INC
37537 RICK BOLONCHUK
37538 MIKE MARUSHIN
950.05
94.00
15.00
29.10
0.00
61.80
6328.92
77262.89
25314.32
41804.79
124212.64
3606.39
11471.25
14054.97
26176.98
13499.05
40930.85
35337.72
136632.80
90.80
38.87
126.50
37539 VOID OUT CHECK
0.00 55803969
$1O925 .84
9ov-I H
DISTRIBUTION BY FUND
10 GENERAL
11 CERTIFICATE OF IMAM
t -- LIQUOR STORE-P V M
k. LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE
31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP
33 UTILITY BOND FUND
43 77 FIRE DEBT FUND
44 UTILITY DEBT FUND
51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD
73 WATER FUND
77 SEWER FUND
81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND
82 FIRE RELIEF FUND
$1205925.84
225794.16
4070.00
41493.46
16247.05
67544.28
326238.33
61717.35
85530.85
253847.13
26617.11
2901.64
10586.48
81338.00
A/v 4
Eder. Prairie City Counell
AugustI,1537 Eder. Prairie. Minnesota i.,5 .34.4
Dear Council:
On August 1, 1937 the Minnesota State statue covering
restaurants with wine and beer licenses was changed allowing the
serving of strong beer.
Beijing 11 ine.. DBA: Beijing Chinese Cuisine, 9P.2 Prairie Center
Drive, Prairie View Center, Eden Prairie respectfully asks the City
Council to consider amending the City statue to be consistent with
the new MinneSota State ruling.
Our main purpose in making this request is that Beijing would
like to serve certain Chinese beers that have more than 3.2 alchohol
content. Also it has never made complete sense to us that we are
allowed to serve all wines despite their having a much higher than
- 2 alchehol content, b ,,It we are restricted to beer. We assume
is logic was responsible for the statewide change.
We were informed of the state change by Mr. Walter Pent, State
Office for Liquor Control.
Beijing has enjoyed serving quality Chinese cuisine te the local
community. We feel the requested change would assist us in serving
our customers letter. Thank you for taking this matter under
consideration.
Ael Kurww
Viee President
Beijing 1.1 Inc.
DBA: Beijing Chinese Cuisine
sz 1r, ft, rh V
T. ,
fed vr?4,7 CENTER
• •7-
(E',19)
MEMORANDUM
TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CARL J. JULLIE
CITY MANAGER
THRU: NATALIE J. SWAGGERT
DIRECTOR HUMAN RESORCES/SERVICES
DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 1987
SUBJECT: STRATEGIC PLAN SCHEDULE
DATE TIME
Distribute Prework-(Strategic Planning Questionaire and
Myers Briggs Type Indicator)
Due back to consultant
Session I: What Is Strategic Planning
-Group Prework results
-Information Gathering
Follow-Up Staff: Share MB Indicator results, discuss staff
issues related to Strategic Planning.
Follow-Up Council: Share MB Indicator results, discuss
staff issues related to Strategic Planning.
Session II: Getting Going
(All) -Ice breaking/working together
-Develop Mission Statement
-Assign subgroup work
To Be Determined Working session for Subgroup(s)
(11/6 - 11/18)
11/19 9-5
or
1-8
Session III: Developing the plan
-Subgroup report
-Issue identification/prioritization
-Goal setting - (1 to 3 years)
-Plan follow-up
9/29
10/6
10/13 1-5
10/21 9-12
OR
10/22 9-12
10/21 5-8
OR
10/22 2-5
11/5 9-5
or
1-8
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commis
s
i
o
n
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
''
August 11, 1987
Request From Stan Tekiela
Attached is a letter from Mr. Stan Tekiela, 15
1
3
5
L
e
s
l
e
y
L
a
n
e
,
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
.
As the letter indicates, Mr. Tekiela has bee
n
i
n
c
o
n
t
a
c
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
o
n
several occasions requesting them to clean-up
t
h
e
t
r
a
s
h
t
h
a
t
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
d
u
m
p
e
d
on a County owned piece of property in norther
n
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
.
The specific site is PID 04-116-22-14-0005, a
3
4
.
0
8
a
c
r
e
p
a
r
c
e
l
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
l
y
east of the Chicago/Milwaukee and St. Paul Rai
l
r
o
a
d
a
n
d
w
e
s
t
a
n
d
n
o
r
t
h
o
f
Birch Island Road. This parcel is heavily w
o
o
d
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
a
n
d
w
e
s
t
s
i
d
e
with a marshy area in the north and east cor
n
e
r
.
D
u
e
t
o
t
h
e
c
o
n
f
i
g
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
the parcel and the steep wooded slope that d
r
o
p
s
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
m
a
r
s
h
y
a
r
e
a
,
i
t
would be difficult to develop without major a
l
t
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
l
a
n
d
.
Mr. Tekiela is requesting that the Parks, Re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Commission and the City Council consider con
t
a
c
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
i
f
they would consider donating that parcel to
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
f
o
r
p
a
r
k
purposes. Mr. Tekiela cites several reasons
w
h
y
h
e
f
e
e
l
s
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
s
h
o
u
l
d
consider this recommendation:
1. The land is either steeply wooded or marshy.
2. There is already a cinder chip trail that is
u
s
e
d
b
y
w
a
l
k
e
r
s
a
n
d
r
u
n
n
e
r
s
from one end to the other.
3. The land is immediately adjacent to Birch Isl
a
n
d
P
a
r
k
,
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
e
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
that the railroad divides the park from this p
a
r
c
e
l
.
4. It is used by the people of Edenwood for natu
r
e
w
a
l
k
s
.
Mr. Tekiela also believes that if this was a
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
C
i
t
y
p
a
r
k
i
t
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
less likely to be used as a dumping ground.
The Community Services Staff have reviewed th
i
s
p
a
r
c
e
l
a
n
d
c
o
n
c
u
r
w
i
t
h
M
r
.
Tekiela's recommendation.
The County owns several other small parcels i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
l
y
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
i
s
parcel which also should be considered for par
k
a
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
d
u
e
t
o
t
h
e
i
r
configuration, and proximity to this parcel an
d
r
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
t
r
a
c
k
s
.
If the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource
s
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
concur with the recommendation, the City sho
u
l
d
s
e
n
d
a
f
o
r
m
a
l
l
e
t
t
e
r
o
f
request for the County to consider transfer of
o
w
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
o
f
t
h
a
t
p
a
r
c
e
l
t
o
t
h
e
City for park purposes.
BL:md
,),(1 ‘)(
1Y1 r
_ _ wr n-1:n23 it-o you 0400.4-
— rn y c onus- n o-F- A- ?c,reLi le,n4 4-4- VS owne-A,
#.t4fl Caul ci,1 4 s locAk-u.4. n 1.n4 ; n.
RectN m Crrr 4oE'
. ezoGral, n 5 A-leics-i- \le_vi ive-rse.
bePu-4-S-o Rke-Qg CY" kc,r‘cl 6-t 6far)41, rne 14-1-0
(Jubkn c- 9 ; n.3 vvaci.. EuLry-fv,i -Crarn ct
4-7“?..e s 4-0 CI viCt T rc,A-elz mccti
cns 4tc ccss clippinr_.
Van t urr. Wtiifl +he-fr /Z4 r
a.0 pay 5 0, re. cui clurn0) n3 11-VW-Ca untA-4 n IRA t5s
qtort5 coo,c1 R-1Lo.ini Scg-n
as\o kic, Gina, 4-VI.cow s LA- QS
A-4,1005 kn 'Or (A)A'S rre./1-1- bz. 4-4/ co wn
Nce.<1,1e.5 s , s (to/ 5; ni
AA'Ac,rn 5 J S4". (=kr\ (Lye.
t.\IQue \DQ-e-ri LOG rki (-'3 .1"1 441C- y Qrld. Vn 61)-C-011 c)Ze i91.2_ 4 a411R.0;h Cu
. , un.
\c, rtic.nc......1.44- ar-C ce a fi-bk. 40
\t+ 3 z-;`r posh-d. -Czymi4-1-c-Rs c..0110
me A" A-kni 5 Lc kid- C "dump; j roveic.1
A104 0A.M.. • t,020-14 q
a\ a 5..,0„0,e_ &co ? 0;-- 0ZjrC\7c-V, k:Pa
0-cnkco_Acal bv. 61 y
("re, tr,R. rt'bi'lC 0.414vn+ ct Oa. #t y kxse
\ler y V1,2_1 1) -c-Q II if\ 4,0 4-Vv.f.c'e k-re k CS C-C 1M2.
by Amu.) cvn cl, trun po sstbl y 41,14 clwrift( \(l o _
s On \ ItUy ,
w
17, eseA- 4.6 41-14. Fo 1 ,14-
i. L.3k& \L4-- ro Pbsg +1,L 6 4\ Eau\ crc t r, e me..44-..‘ hqe. it t ut
,i)ro OP-al .
re. Q.0/ ez_ -Phis kna. ;-P pcs sc.; -Prc
14(21) nqc.i n Coo n4-7, 1.01,1c1A i 5 on e 40 mg' n-k
dug. obvioos G'elt stn c-ta 4-t./ r 4„.
4.-VNL lry i)d boc: t)kk doe_s c /114 ry zi
01- fl,No nu, ,
IL't‘LJ #41A4- )&((e..5 i 4- &u o plc b04-
‘1 Yo
'øo a* 44ixe. k.rd,-fP yoo zul ct
a to 4- e- 061-Q4vViet I „ ma 1 t51. fj-
k b 11N1A- CO2- 0(11y s e re
\iy sA-tc-Ip ToorNa. Qncl, 0,27 ICt...1
q a‘ r3ty sroon ct . very /0r0/r-
d; ris OAi # wcold. 4-rAV,2- otkok- o 4-
drto m3e.s 4,5 rilmu_ 4i4.1 ink-o so nu. 14,,,a oc_
641 4.l rnerdr.
2. 11 ra.mi2;9,:tyQ e--inde-r eil n p 4itit
u5e,J, by LocAkas 4- cum a (5 4.,44- ft.,N5
aux end 1-tv.. land 44,7e o44et.
'11'n.\s 10.rvi qtroz et)/ bumps op 9,s();ns-1-
Q...)4 5 k-‘ c)c,,c . t)q q. Ii-s u5Ld 0
— +14e-re- v-S n A".. 0 0 -CO _
01'
1-"'"'"Iftr•
-7" COUW, 0).) (A ) AAA_ _W10(24
Poi
4 uery 5o:4 _
cobtzfr% __0 -C s
WI4ngy/ritn4- _
yo,..) poi
casids _p-t; _ _
12% N -4-1,v_ cct
(Lbc4 t --C1Q a.- e- \`'
_ .
_-50mtncry
8.5 _et 5 P.. Vice_c 1:176. hc 2_q _ d
,c1 5 i .75 ._eXc. /a ty-P WA/
- frciirie ,
_ _ri) • -
S-1-prn
J?3 .S fzs ly
553
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY SERVICES
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
CCNSTRUCTICN OF PARTIAL REPAIRS TO THE
EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER
ADVERT/SEMENT FOR BIDS
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
The City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota will receive bids at
the Office of the City Manager until 2:00 P.M. Tuesday, October 13, 1987, at
which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chamber of the City
Offices. They will then be tabulated and will be considered by the Council at
7:30 P.M. on October 20, 1987 in the Council Chamber at the City Offices at
7600 Executive Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344-3677.
Project - Eden Prairie City Services, Construction of Partial Repairs to the
Eden Prairie Community Center; 16700 Valley View Road; Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
There will be a single contract for all General, Mechanical, Electrical and
Site Work according to the Plans and Specifications on file in the Office of
the City Manager.
All bids shall be made on the Proposal Forms provided and shall be accompanied
by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check, payable to
the order of the City of Eden Prairie for not less than five percent (5%) of
the amount bid.
Bids Shall be directed to the Office of the City Manager at Eden Prairie City
Offices, Attention: Robert Lambert, Director of Community Services, 7600
Executive Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344-3677, in an envelope securely
sealed and marked "Bid for Partial Repairs to the Eden Prairie Community
Center" on its outside. No bid may be withdrawn for a period of forty-five
(45) days after the date and time set for the opening of bids.
The City Council reserves the right to reject all bids and to waive minor
irregularities therein and further reserves the right to award the contract in
the best interests of the City.
Proposal Forms, Contract Documents, Plans and Specifications are on ,file and
may be seen at the offices of Setter, Leach & Lindstrom, Inc., 1011 Nicollet
Mall, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403-2491, and at the Minneapolis and Saint Paul
Builders Exchange.
On and after September 15, 1987, copies of the Plans and Specifications will be
provided to prime bidders only by Setter, Leach & Lindstrom, Inc., 1011
Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403-2491, Phone 612/338-8741, upon
request to any prospective bidder and upon cash payment of $50.00 to cover the
cost of printing, all of which will be refunded if plans are returned in good
condition within ten days of the date the bids are opened. Drawings and
Specification pages are available at the cost of reproduction, not refundable,
by contacting Setter, Leach & Lindstrom, Inc.
Carl J. Jullie
City Manager
City of Eden Prairie
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services'741=—
DATE: September 10, 1987
SUBJECT: Request to Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Receiving
Bids for Partial Repair of the Community Center
At the September 15th Council meeting Wally Daniels, architect from Setter, Leach and
Lindstrom, will review plans and specifications with the Council for partial repair of
the Eden Prairie Community Center. Staff has recommended proceeding with this partial
repair as soon as possible for the following reasons:
1. Staff is concerned that if we allow the building to go through one more complete
freeze/thaw cycle with the amount of water that is coming through the walls around
the natatorium, there may be permanent structural damage to the facility, and the
cost repairs will certainly be much higher.
2. Staff has closed racquetball court number 3 since last February and, therefore,
has recommended repair of the walls around the racquetball courts as soon as
possible in order to limit the amount of permanent damage, as well as to get that
income producing facility back on line as soon as possible.
3. Staff would have liked to be able to proceed with the entire repair project at
this time, however, commitments for other park improvement projects from cash park
fees would have to be cancelled in order to complete the project prior to
receiving the expected reimbursement from the litigation process.
Staff expects to complete the arbitration hearing process this fall and, hopefully,
receive compensation for damages shortly after the arbitration hearing. As soon as
the amount of damages are set, staff would recommend proceeding with the final phase
of repair which could be completed in the summer of 1988.
The repair will require the removal of the outer wall around the natatorium, and the
construction of a new wall in its place, as well as constructing a second wall around
the racquetball courts. Staff is recommending the outer wall be constructed of brick
to match the fire station at the intersection of County Road 4 and Valley View Road,
which would also be very complimentary to the brick at the high school. The
specifications required the bidders to also bid regular concrete block as an alternate
so the Council can pick the price difference between block and brick.
Mr. Daniels will show a colored rendering of what the building will look like after
the first phase repair, as well as what the building would look like after the final
phase repair. Mr. Daniels will also provide examples of the proposed exterior
material.
The estimated cost for the first phase repair is $340,000 for brick and $325,000 for
block, plus $65,000 for architectual fees including design and inspection. The source
of funding for this project is the cash park fees fund, which will be reimbursed to
the extent of damages awarded from litigation.
BL:md
17,