HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 05/19/1987TUESDAY, MAY 19, 1987
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
7:30 P.M., CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia
Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to
the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director
John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris
Enger, Director of Community Services
Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works
Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary
Jan Nelson
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES OF SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD THURSDAY APRIL 30
1987
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Final Plat Approval for Jennifer Addition (Bank at N.E.
Corner at TH 5 and CSAH T) IfeTOlution No. 87-116
C. Final Plat Aargyll for Storage Complex (Williams Mini-
Storage, TH-1651) Resolution No. 87-117
D. Final Plat Approval for Wilson Pointe (Flying Cloud Drive
north of Valley View Road) Resolution No. 87-11 -8---
E. Authorize preparation of Feasibility Study for Rowland Road
Improvements, I.C. 52-067 (Resolution No. 871-25)—
F. Award bids for Edenbrook Play Structure
G. Change Order No. 2 for Wyndham Knoll Improvements, I.C.
52-097
H. Request Authorization to hire Architect for Renovation of
old City Hall for Senior Center
I. Authorize and request Flenr_jer County to install "No Parking'
signs along Pioneer Trail -fidnty Road-11 near Homeward Hill
Road (Resolution No. 87-126
Page 1092
Page 1095
Page 1096
Page 1095
Page 1102
Page 1105
Page 1106 -
Page 1107
Page 1108
Page 1109
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,May 19, 1987
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. ANDERSON'S GARDEN SHOPPE, by Don C. and Rita L. Anderson and H.J.
Nyhammer. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low
Density Residential to Community Commercial on 2.2 acres, Zoning
District Change from R1-22 to C-Commercial on 1.6 and from R1-22 to
R1-13.5 on 1.86 acres, with variances to be reviewed by the Board of
Appeals, and Preliminary Plat of 3.1 acres into six lots and road
right-of-way. Location: Southeast corner of County Road #4 and
Valley View Road, west of Westgate Lane. A continued public
hearing from May 5, 1987
B. LAVONNE INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS II AND III, by LaVonne Industrial Park
Partnership. Request for Site Plan Review within the 1-2 District
on 7.84 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 on 1.2
acres, from Rural to R1-22 on 2 acres, and from 1-2 to R1-22 on 1.3
acres for construction of 95,100 square feet of industrial space
within two buildings together with 3 single family lots. Location:
East of Chicago Northwestern Railroad, north of Stratford Road, and
west of Leesborough Avenue. (Ordinance #21-87, Rezoning within 1-2
District; Ordinance #22-87, Rezoning from 1-2 to R1-22)
C. FAITH CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment from Low Density Residential to Church on 5.87, Zoning
District Change from Rural to Public, and Preliminary Platting of
5.87 acres into one lot for construction of a church. Location:
South of County Road #1, east of Blossom Road. A public hearing.
(Resolution #87-121, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; Ordinance
#23-87, Rezoning; Resolution #87-122, Preliminary Plat)
D. RIDGEWOOD WEST 6TH by Centex Homes Corporation. Request for
Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on approximately 101
acres, Zoning District change from R1-13.5 to RM-6.5 on 8.1 acres
and Preliminary Plat of 8.1 acres into 60 lots and 10 outlots for
construction of 60 townhouse units. Location: North and east of
Wellington Drive, north and west of Cumberland Road. (Resolution
#87-123, PUD Concept Amendment to Overall Ridgewood West Planned
Unit Development; Ordinance #24-87, Rezoning; Resolution #87-124,
Preliminary Plat)
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Approve Plans and Specifications for Chain of Lakes Project
(Resolution No. 87-119)
B. Request from Naegele Outdoor Advertising regarding billboards
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
IX. APPOINTMENTS
Page 970
Page 111(
Page 112:
Page 113S
Page 1148
Page 114S
Page 115C
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,May 19, 1987
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Discussion to schedule 1-494 presentation
B. Report of City Manager
C. Report of City Attorney
D. Report of Director of Planning
E. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Request authorization to hire Planning and Engineering
Consultant for Parks
2. Request authorization to proceed with Referendum Voter Study
3. Eden Prairie/Edina Adaptive Recreation Program Proposal
F. Report of Director of Public Works
1. Award Contract for Valley View Road Improvements west of
Golden Triangle Drive, I.C. 52-089 (Resolution No. 87:175)
XI. NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Page 1161
Page 1165
Page 1166
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL STAFF PRESENT:
4:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Jean Harris, and
Patricia Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant
to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Assistant City
Attorney Mark Johnson, Director of
Planning Chris Enger, Director of
Community Services Robert Lambert, and
Director of Public Works Eugene Dietz
THURSDAY, APRIL 30, 1987
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Bentley moved and Anderson seconded to approve the agenda as prepared.
Motion passed 5 - O.
II. 2ND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 12-87
Bentley moved and Anderson seconded that the 2nd Reading be approved
for Ordinance No. 12-87, City Code Amendment, Chapter 11, Section
11.35, entitled "Public District", Subdivision 2, to allow private
school as a permitted use and private schools with boarding as a
permitted use.
Bentley noted that the word "sewer" was misspelled in Section 1 of
the Ordinance relating to Subd. 2E of Section 11.35 of the Code
being amended. He further noted that Subd. 2E indicated locations
where private schools could be located in the public zone and that
these zones were not listed. The City Manager said that the site in
the ordinance would be the legal description for the International
School property, and mentioned that the description had just been
received and could not be listed on the ordinance. Bentley said
he thought this ordinance was to be general in nature, and
wondered if future proposals for public schools would require
amendment to the Ordinance Code if they were otherwise approved.
The City Manager responded that this would be so.
Pidcock questioned why Sec. 2 of the Ordinance relating to
Section 11.35, Subd. 17 of the Code would restrict boarding
facilities to a single private school. Bentley said that it would
make sure that a boarding use was tied to only one facility.
Peterson said it was not intended that a hotel be allowed for
students. Assistant City Attorney Mark Johnson provided
clarification about the intent of this provision. Bentley and
Anderson said they would not support the ordinance if this
provision were made any looser. Pidcock asked if the International
School of Minnesota had any problems with this provision.
Representatives for the International School indicated no problems
with the proposed language.
The motion passed, 5 - O.
-2-
III. INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF MINNESOTA INC.
James Steilen, an attorney representing International School of
Minnesota, Inc., summarized the status of approvals and
major issues:
*International School had been before three committees
of the Metropolitan Council and had received approvals
from each.
*Agreements had been signed with the Metropolitan Council
and Hennepin Parks earlier in the day.
*Exchanges of property had taken place:
- The floodplain and a knoll had been deeded to Hennepin
Parks
- A triangular parcel along Purgatory Creek which
Hennepin Parks had wanted for trail and creek corridor
integrity had been conveyed through an easement
- The one-acre so-called Hanley parcel was being deeded
to International School.
*An emergency access easement over Hennepin Parks property
would be executed by May 20, a date prior to issuance of
building permits.
*International School had committed to installation of emergency
access improvements prior to issuance of the occupancy
permit.
*An escrow closing on the property had been accomplished
earlier in the day.
*The Development Agreement with the City was being finalized,
and the restrictive covenants and assessment agreements
were being signed.
City Attorney Roger Pauly asked that the Agenda be amended to add
for consideration Resolution No. 87-99 for final approval of the
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment (Resolution No. 87-60 gave
preliminary approval of the Amendment subject to Metropolitan
Council concurrence.)
Bentley moved and Harris seconded that the Agenda be amended
to add Item IV, Resolution No. 87-99 for Final Approval of
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, and that later items be
appropriately renumbered. Motion passed, 5 - O.
The meeting recessed at 4:20 PM to allow the parties an
opportunity to review the documents under consideration.
The meeting resumed at 4:57. The City Attorney reported that the
Development Agreement had been signed. He recommended that
the Council approve the Agreement.
- 3 -
Pidcock moved and Bentley seconded that the 2nd Reading be
approved for Ordinance No. 10-87, Zoning District Change from
Rural to Public on 38.4 acres. Motion passed 5 - O.
Pidcock moved and Bentley seconded that the Development Agreement
be approved and that Resolution No. 87-115, Authorizing Summary
of Ordinance No. 10-87 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary
be adopted. Motion passed 5 - O.
IV. RESOLUTION NO. 87-99
Bentley moved and Pidcock seconded to approve Resolution No. 87-99,
giving final approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment. Motion
passed 5 - O.
V. NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
Bentley moved and Harris seconded that the meeting be adjourned at
4:59 PM. Motion passed, 5 - O.
Respectfully submitted,
Craig W. Dawson
Recording Secretary
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
May 19, 1987
CONTRACTOR (MULTI FAMILY & COMM.)
Data Card Corporation
Pete's Repair, Inc.
Pump & Meter Service
The Schuett Investment Co.
Sorenson Gross Construction
Veit Construction
Paul Walentiny Construction
CONTRACTOR (I & 2 FAMILY)
Contemporary Design & Construction
DMC Enterprises
Dole Company
E & S Plumbing, Inc.
Foxborough Homes, Inc.
Groff Construction, Inc.
M. Gunderson Construction
Paul Heins Construction
Al Hirsch Construction
Harlan Koehnen Builders
LeGran Homes, Inc.
Metro Handy Man, Inc.
etro Masonary, Inc.
Nature's Way
New Spaces Home Craftsman
Patio Enclosures, Inc.
Quam Development
R & I Construction
Ken Roelofs Construction
Southern Metro Construction
Unibilt, Inc.
M. E. Zastera Construction
GAS FITTER
Abel Heating, Inc.
Boedeker Plumbing & Heating
Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal
Hokanson Plumbing
Marsh Heating & Air Conditioning
D. R. McDermott Plumbing
Riccar Heating & Ventilating
South Town Plumbing, Inc.
Ron's Mechanical
Royalton Heating & Cooling Co
Williams Mechanical Contractor
PLUMBING
All-American Mechanical, Inc.
Boedeker Plumbing & Heating
Heins & Sons Plumbing
Hokanson Plumbing
D. R. McDermott Plumbing
McQuillan Bros.
O'Brien Plumbing & Heating
P J Plumbing & Heating
Project Plumbing
R. C. Plumbing
Ron's Plumbing
Southtown Plumbing, Inc.
Terry Sturm Plumbing & Heating
Williams Mechanical Contractor
SEPTIC SYSTEMS
O'Brien Plumbing & Heating
HEATING & VENTILATING WATER SOFTENER
Abel Heating, Ihc. O'Brien Plumbing & Heating
Air Conditioning Assoc.,Inc.
AirCorp, Inc. UTILITY INSTALLER
Marsh Heating & Air Cond. Hokanson Plumbing
Mc Quillan Bros.
O'Brien Plumbing & Heating WELL DRILLING
Preferred Mechanical Services E. H. Renner & Sons, Inc.
Ron's Mechanical
Royalton Heating & Cooling Co. MECHANICAL GAME
SBS Mechanical, Inc. Twin City Novelty
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for
liceued activity.
'7) A I •
P
Pat Salle, Licensing
/
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-116
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
JENNIFER ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of JENNIFER ADDITION has been submitted in a manner required
for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462
of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for JENNIFER ADDITION is approved upon
compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on
this plat dated May 19, 1987.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving
the six-month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the
preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said
engineer's report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of
this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named
plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the
certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance
with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on May 19, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
1
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT OF FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician
DATE: May 12, 1987
SUBJECT: JENNIFER ADDITION
PROPOSAL: The Developer's, Copeland-Mithon, Inc. ha
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
approval of the final plat of Jennifer Addition, fo
r
m
e
r
l
y
k
n
o
w
n
a
s
the Minnetonka State Bank. The site, containing 3.
4
5
a
c
r
e
s
,
i
s
a
replat of Outlot E, Gonyea 4th Addition located no
r
t
h
o
f
S
t
a
t
e
H
i
g
h
-
way No. 5 and east of County Road No. 4. A bank/of
f
i
c
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
i
s
presently being constructed upon this lot. Additio
n
a
l
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
dedication for County Road 4 is included in the pla
t
.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
5
,
1987, per Resolution 86-186.
Zoning to Community Commercial was finally read and
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
the City Council on September 16, 1986 per Ordinanc
e
N
o
.
4
0
-
8
6
.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this r
e
p
o
r
t
w
a
s
executed on September 16, 1986.
VARIANCES: A variance from the requirements of City
C
o
d
e
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
1
2
.
2
0
,
Subd. 2.A waiving the six-month maximum time elapse
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
approval dates of the preliminary plat and final pl
a
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
necessary.
All other variance rquests, not defined in the Devel
o
p
e
r
'
s
Agreement must be processed through the Board of App
e
a
l
s
.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities an
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
t
o
provide service to the site have been installed.
PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication shall conform to
C
i
t
y
C
o
d
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
BONDING: Bonding conforming to City Standards, mu
s
t
b
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
t
o
s
a
t
i
s
f
y
items 7 and 8 of the Developer's Agreement prior t
o
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
plat. The amount of the bond or letter of credit
m
u
s
t
b
e
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
by the Director of Public Works.
PAGE 2
JENNIFER ADDITION MAY 12, 1987
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Jennifer Addition
subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement
and the following:
1. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $307.00.
2. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of 345.00
3. Satisfaction of bonding requirements in conjunction with items
7 and 8 of the Developer's Agreement
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-117
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
STORAGE COMPLEX
WHEREAS, the plat of STORAGE COMPLEX has been submitted in a manner
required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under
Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had
thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for STORAGE COMPLEX is approved upon
compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on
this plat dated May 12, 1987.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of
this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named
plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized '71 execute
the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon
compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on May 19, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician
DATE: May 12, 1987
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
PROPOSAL: The Developer, Robert Williams, has requested Ci
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
of the final plat of Storage Complex, a 3.24 acre
s
i
t
e
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
f
o
r
use as a mini-storage complex. The site is locate
d
s
o
u
t
h
o
f
Anderson Lakes Parkway and east of TH 169 in the
S
o
u
t
h
h
a
l
f
o
f
Section 23.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Co
u
n
c
i
l
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
,
1986, per Resolution #86-298.
The zoning change from rural to 1-2 Park Distric
t
w
a
s
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
by the City Council January 20, 1987, per Ordinance 60-86. An
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
0.5 acre was added to the 1-2 Park District and
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
C
i
t
y
Council April 7, 1987, per Ordinance 11-87.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within thi
s
r
e
p
o
r
t
w
a
s
e
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
February 3, 1987. An amendment to that agreement
w
a
s
m
a
d
e
A
p
r
i
l
7
,
1987.
VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through
t
h
e
B
o
a
r
d
o
f
Appeals.
UTILITIES & STREETS: Sanitary sewer is not available to serve this
s
i
t
e
;
therefore, a septic system is proposed until san
i
t
a
r
y
s
e
w
e
r
b
e
c
o
m
e
s
available. Watermain is available at the north p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
o
f
Modern Tire. The Developer will be responsible f
o
r
e
x
t
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
i
s
watermain south to serve his site. Prior to rele
a
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
f
i
n
a
l
plat, a bond to cover the costs of extension of s
a
i
d
w
a
t
e
r
m
a
i
n
m
u
s
t
be provided.
PARK DEDICATION: Park Dedication will conform to the requirements
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Code and Developer's Agreement.
BONDING: Bonding will conform to City Code and th
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
'
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
PAGE 2
STORAGE COMPLEX MAY 12, 1987
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Storage Complex
subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's
Agreement and the following:
I. Receipt of street light fee of $154.00
2. Receipt of engineering fee of $324.00
3. Satisfaction of bonding requirements
JJ:ss
cc: Robert Williams
Finn Daniels
Egan, Field, Nowak, Inc.
2
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-118
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
WILSON POINTE
WHEREAS, the plat of WILSON POINTE has been submitted in a manner required for
platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of
the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for WILSON POINTE is approved upon compliance
with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat
dated May 12, 1987.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving
the six-month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the
preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said
engineer's report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of
this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named
plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the
certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance
with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on May 19, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician
DATE: May 12, 1987
SUBJECT: Wilson Pointe (formerly Eden Pointe)
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jul He, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
PROPOSAL: The Developer, Welsh Companies, Incorporated,
h
a
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
C
i
t
y
Council approval of the final plat of Wilson P
o
i
n
t
e
,
a
2
.
8
4
a
c
r
e
site intended for office/warehouse use. Locat
e
d
n
o
r
t
h
o
f
V
a
l
l
e
y
View Road, east of T.H. 169 in the South half
o
f
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
1
2
,
t
h
i
s
plat is a re-plat of outlot A Wilson Ridge.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
o
n
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
16, 1986 per Resolution 86-320.
Zoning from rural to Planned Unit Development
9
-
8
6
-
1
-
2
P
a
r
k
District was finally read and approved by City
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
18, 1987, per Ordinance 61-86-PUD-9-86.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within th
i
s
r
e
p
o
r
t
w
a
s
executed January 20, 1987.
VARIANCES: All variance requests must be proces
s
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
B
o
a
r
d
o
f
Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: With the exception of a storm sewer line ove
r
t
h
e
west side of the property, all municipal utilit
i
e
s
a
n
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
necessary to serve this site are in place. The
s
t
o
r
m
s
e
w
e
r
l
i
n
e
shall be designed and installed in conformance
w
i
t
h
C
i
t
y
standards.
PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are cov
e
r
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
Developer's Agreement.
BONDING: Bonding will conform to the requirements of Ci
t
y
C
o
d
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
Developer's Agreement. Prior to rcicase of the
f
i
n
a
l
p
l
a
t
,
bonding to cover the installation of storm sewer
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
received.
PAGE 2
WILSON POINTE MAY 12, 1987
RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend approval of the final plat of Wilso
n
P
o
i
n
t
e
subject to the requirements of this report, the
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
'
s
Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of street lighting fee of $307.00
2. Receipt of engineering fee of $284.00
3. Satisfaction of bonding requirements
JJ:ss
cc: Welsh Companies
Ron Krueger & Associates
2
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-120
RESOLUTION ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT
WHEREAS, it is proposed to make the following improvements:
I.C. 52-067
Street and Utility Improvements for Rowland Road
Between Shady Oak Road and CSAH 62.
and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the
improvements, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chaper 429.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council:
That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study
with the assistance of RCM, Inc. and that a feasibility report shall be
prepared and presented to the City Council with all convenient speed
advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment
and feasibility of the proposed improvements.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 19, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THRU: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
FROM: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape ArchitecdPFL.—°'"
DATE: May 11, 1987
SUBJECT: Edenbrook Playground Structure
Earlier this year, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission,
City staff and residents of the Woodlawn Heights area met to review a concept
plan for Edenbrook Park. Residents were excited about the plans for their
neighborhood park and are anxious to see facilties added this summer. A
request for playstructure bids was sent out, which included plans,
specifications and an evaluation sheet. All companies were required to
provide as much playstructure as possible for $8,000.
The evaluation form was composed to compare playstructure quality rather than
rely on costs alone. Guarantee, aesthetics, circulation, skill level, among
other criteria are assessed in the evaluation form.
Bids were received and reviewed May 4, 1987. The Landscape Structure
submittal, by Earl F. Anderson and Associates, scored the highest rating on
the evaluation form. It is the staff opinion the playstructure is the best
play value for the dollar and should be selected to be installed at Edenbrook
Park, and staff requests the Council to approve Earl F. Anderson's proposal
for $8,000. Funds would come from cash park fees.
BPC:md
LA = ••n• 1 be used by the Community Services III
MILANI
=Mal MI 'MIMI
oc,LJl a
GAVIIIra
13111 IMMO! pacaul
1121011011
ong
cs,
Belt Swings
Slide
Spiral Slide
Multi Level Decks
Climber Variety
Bridge/Tube/Net Connection
Unique Components
Sliding Pole
Wheel
Play Counter
Others
Balance
Creative Play
Access Point Variety
Circulation
Variety in Skill Level .
Social Cooperation
Interior Spaces
Color Usage
Movement Variety
Material Longevity
Esthetic Value
Price
Guarantee
0-3-6
0-3-8
0-8
0-4-8
0-4-8
4-8
0-2
0-2
0-2
0-2
0-2
0-4-8
0-4-8
0-4-8
0-4-8
0-4-8
0-4-8
0-4-8
0-4-8
0-4-8
0-3-6 •
0-3-6 i
0-3-5-1( 1
0-3-6 ' 3WVN ANVdW03 EVALUATION CRITERIA Nblid NOCMIN3a3
The Above Changes are Aoaroved
RCM, INC.
1 By
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By
Date
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
May 5, 1987
Project: Wyndham Knoll
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
LC. 52-097
RCM Project No. 861013-2
TO: Nodland Construction Company, Inc.
You are hereby directed to make the changes noted below in the subject contract ;
Nature of Change
The subgrade soils in the Wyndham Knoll Project are highly saturated silty clays. In
order to provide a stable subgrade for street construction, it is recommended that one to
two three (depending on subgrade stability) of existing silty clay material be excavated
and replaced with granular materials. A geotextile fabric shall be placed between the
natural subgrade soils and the granular backfill. The granular backfill shall be in
accordance with MnDOT Specification 2116.2A except that the percent passing the #200
sieve shall be less than 10 percent. Short sections of perforated drain tile shall be
stubbed from catchbasins at the low points in the streets to provide for drainage of the
granular subgrade section.
Ad iustments to Contract Ouantities and Costs
Add the following quantities and costs to the contract:
Common Excavation
Select Granular Borrow
Geotex tile
4. Perforated Tile
TOTAL
7,400
9,000
12,000
330
CY
Ton
SY
LF
$2.00
$5.00
$1.10
$8.00
$14,800.00
$45,000.00
$13,200.00
$ 2.640.00
S75,640.00
Summary of Contract Adjustments
Contract Amount Prior to this Change Order
$622,833.00
Net Increase Resulting From this Change Order
75 640.0Q
Current Contract Amount Including this Change Order
$698,473.00
The Above Changes are Accepted
NODLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
(-4121-4_4,
Date
MEMDRANDUM
4' TO: Mayor and Eden Prairie City Council City Council
THRU: Carl Jullie City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
FROM: Rick Bolinske, Superintendent of Recreationkg
DATE: Wednesday, May 13
SUBJECT: Remodeling of old City Hall into Eden Prairie Senior
Citizens Center
Staff recommends hiring the architectural firm of Gluts, O'Brien, Strothers,
Architectural Firm to draw up the plans and specifications, and ready for bid
the remodeling of the lower level of the old City Hall into the Eden Prairie
Senior Center. Money for the project and for the paying of the architectural
fees will come from the $30,000 community block grant the City of Eden Prairie
received. The architect assigned to the project would be Dan O'Brien.
Tentative time table for the project is as follows.
1. Advertise in E.P. News and Construction Bulletin on May 27
and June 3rd.
2. Open the bids 2:00 p.m., Thursday, June 11th.
3. Award bids June 16th.
U. Begin construction by June 29th.
5. Have construction completed by August 15th.
Remodeling of the lower level of the old City Hall will involve adding a kitchen
facility, tearing out a few walls, replacing some walls, adding a handicap ramp
exit/entry, plus general remodeling such as adding carpet, etc. Please consider
hiring the firm of Cluts, O'Brien, and Strothers Architectural Firm to do this
remodeling project.
Cost estimate is $3,000 for architectural services and funds would come from the
Community Development Block Grant.
/76//
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-126
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND REQUESTING HENNEPIN COUNTY
TO INSTALL NO PARKING SIGNS ALONG
PIONEER TRAIL (COUNTY ROAD NO. 1)
NEAR HOMEWARD HILLS ROAD
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has experienced an unusu
a
l
l
y
l
a
r
g
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
on-street parking during church activities in the above de
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
a
r
e
a
,
a
n
d
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie Public Safety has determin
e
d
t
h
e
o
n
-
s
t
r
e
e
t
parking problem to be a very unsafe situtation with people c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
c
o
u
n
t
y
road between cars etc., and has recommended no parking.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Co
u
n
c
i
l
a
s
f
o
l
l
o
w
s
:
Authorize and request the Hennepin County Department of
Transportation to install the necessary "no parking anytime"
signs to be installed on the north and south sides of Pionee
r
Trail (County Road No. 1) from a point 100 feet west of Port
a
l
Drive to a point 300 feet east of Homeward Hills Road.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 19, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
I n :)9
'7- PROPOSED SITE
FP
-4k\:
AREA LOCATION MAP ;
ro o m me mug igionsau
L'4% 'qv
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Scott A. Kipp, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
April 24, 1987
LaVonne Industrial Park, Building II
Northwest corner of Carlson Drive and Edenvale Boulevard
LaVonne Industrial Park Partnership
Norman Undestad
Site Plan Review within the 1-2 District on 3.3 acres.
NOTE: This report covers only the Site Plan Review for LaVonne Building II. The
second Staff Report will cover the remainder of the proponents request.
Background
This site is part of the 32-acre
LaVonne Industrial Park Planned Unit
Development (PUG). The property was
zoned 1-2 Park in 1969 per Ordinance
#135. In 1982, the PUD Concept was
approved, and the property platted,
with the requirement that specific
site plans return to the Planning
Comnission and City Council for
their review and approval.
Surrounding land uses consist of
additional industrial to the west,
Ponderosa Hills (R1-22) to the
south, and Tanager Creek (RM-6.5) to
the east.
Site Plan
The proponent is proposing the
construction of a 40,000 square foot
industrial/warehouse building on
approximately 3.3 acres with a Floor
Area Ratio (FAR) at 28%. City Dade
would allow up to 30% FAR in the 1-2
District. Building and parking
LaVonne Industrial Park, Building II 2 April 24, 1987
areas meet the minimum setback requirements for the 1-2 Zoning District. A total of
114 parking spaces are being proposed for this site based on 1/3 office, 1/3
manufacturing, and 1/3 warehouse uses which is in accordance with the parking
requirements for a spec warehouse building.
As part of the Planned Unit Development Concept approval, truck access for this site
was to be limited to Carlson Drive only. The proposed access utilizes two existing
curb cuts along Edenvale Boulevard together with a cross-access from a previously
approved LaVonne Industrial Building to the north. Truck circulation as proposed
would use Carlson Drive as an entrance to the loading facility via the cross-access,
with the westerly-most access along Edenvale Boulevard as the exit. Staff would
concur with this circulation pattern with the following recommendations: 1) truck
route signage should be posted along the westerly exit directing truck traffic to
Carlson Drive only, 2) the easterly access on Edenvale Boulevard should be closed in
an effort to deter truck traffic from utilizing Edenvale Boulevard from the east,
which runs through the Tanager Creek residential development. In addition, the
drive isle adjacent to the loading bays should be widened to provide through traffic
for trucks while existing bays are being utilized.
Prior to building permit issuance, proponent should record with Hennepin County a
perpetual cross-access easement for this shared access to the loading facilities.
Two-way drive isles for parking require 25 feet per City Code. The proponent should
revise the drive isle for the most easterly parking area from 23 feet to 25 feet.
Grading and Utilities
This site was previously graded at the time when Edenvale Boulevard was constructed.
The existing topography of the site gradually slopes from Edenvale Boulevard towards
the northwest from approximately 912 to 906 with no existing vegetation on-site.
The proposed grading provides for berms up to elevation 916 which adequately screen
the parking areas from Edenvale Boulevard, together with a berm near the
intersection of Carlson Drive and Edenvale Boulevard to provide screening for the
loading facilities.
Utilities are available to the site with connection to services along Edenvale
Boulevard. An on-site storm sewer system is being proposed which drains site run-
off to the north into an existing 24-inch storm sewer.
Architecture
The 18-foot structure is proposed to be constructed of pre-fabricated concrete tilt-
up panels, glass, and stucco entry canopies. City Code requires that any pre-cast
concrete units be intricately treated with an applied decorative material or
texture. Prior to City Council review, proponent should submit a sample of this
material to Staff for review.
The proposed loading facilities of this structure are being designed in such a
manner as to cut off views to the loading bay doors from the public roadways, with
the exception of the drive-up bay situated on the east side of the building. The
proponent should maximize screening efforts with berming and plantings to screen any
potential views into this loading area. This item is to be discussed further in the
landscaping section.
LaVonne Industrial Park, Building II 3 April 24, 1987
A rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan has not been submitted for review at
this time. City Code requires the units to be screened with materials
architecturally integral to the structure. Prior to City Council review, proponent
shall submit a detailed plan indicating the location and type of construction for
the screening units.
Landscaping
The landscaping as proposed meets minimum requirements per City Code. Parking areas
will be screened from Edenvale Boulevard with landscaped berms. The proponent has
also indicated the use of a berm near the intersection of Carlson Drive and Edenvale
Boulevard to help screen the loading facility area and drive-up door. Staff would
recorrmend that this berm be lengthened and additional conifers be provided to
maximize screening for the loading bay isle, parking area, and drive-up door
facility.
litcatinct
Since this property is near a residential area, lighting should be of a downcast
variety with a maximum height of 20 feet to limit off-site glare.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recomend approval of the request for Site Plan Review within an 1-2
District on approximately 3.3 acres based on plans dated April 13, 1987, subject to
the recomendations of the Staff Report, dated April 24, 1987, and subject to the
following:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Close off the easterly access on Edenvale Boulevard to deter truck
traffic from using Edenvale Boulevard from the east.
B. Indicate truck traffic routing signs directing trucks to Carlson
Drive only.
C. Widen the loading area drive isle to accomodate through traffic
while existing bays are in use.
D. Widen the parking isle for the most easterly parking area to 25
feet.
E. Submit a saaple of the pre-cast material to determine if it meets
the City Code.
F. Provide a mechanical equipment screening plan indicating the
location and method of construction.
G. Lengthen the most easterly landscaped berm and provide additional
conifers to maximize screening for the loading bay isle, parking
area, and drive-up door facility.
2. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
LaVonne Industrial Park, Building II 4 April 24, 1987
A. Record at Hennepin County, a perpetual cross-access easement for the
truck traffic entrance.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off, erosion control, and utility
plans for review by the City Engineer and Watershed District.
C. Submit site lighting details for review.
D. Submit building material samples and colors for review.
E. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
F. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading.
STAFF REPORT
Planning Commission
Scott A. Kipp, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
April 24, 1987
LaVonne Industrial Park, Building III and three residential lots.
Northeast and southeast corners of Carlson Drive and Edenvale
Boulevard.
LaVonne Industrial Partnership
Norman Undestad
1. Site Plan Review within the 1-2 District on 3.34 acres.
2. Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 on 1.2 acres and
from Rural to R1-22 on two acres, and from 1-2 to R1-22 on
1.3 acres.
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
NOTE: This report covers the site plan review and zoning for LaVonne Building III
and the Rezoning for the three residential lots.
LAVONNE INDUSTRIAL PARK - BUILDING III )
Background
The Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts
an industrial land use for this lot.
The majority of this property was
zoned 1-2 Park in 1969 per Ordinance
#135. It is part of the LaVonne
Industrial Park Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Concept that was
approved and platted in 1982, with
the requirement that specific site
plans be returned to the Planning
Commission and City Council for
their review and approval. At that
time, the proponents request also
included a rezoning of the remainder
of this lot from Rural to 1-2 Park.
The City Council felt that zoning
should take place at the time of
site plan review. Surrounding land
/A
/1 R1-13.5i
111 •
11C:017 140.1111.1111
a 411 'RP • r _
AREA LOCATION MAP
LaVonne Industrial Park, Building III 2 April 24, 1987
use consists of additional industrial to the west, Ponderosa Hills (R1-22) to the
south, and Tanager Creek (RM-6.5) to the east.
Site Plan
The proponent is proposing the construction of a 55,000 square foot
industrial/Warehouse building on approximately 4.54 acres with a Floor Area Ratio
(FAR) at 29%. City Code would allow up to 30% FAR in the 1-2 District. The
building configuration meets the required setbacks for the 1-2 District with the
loading facilities facing the floodplain to the north. Setbacks for parking are 50
feet along Edenvale Boulevard and 25 feet along Carlson Drive consistent with a
corner lot development; however, revisions to the parking setbacks will need to take
place as shown on Attachment A. A total of 157 parking spaces are being proposed
for this site based on 1/3 office, 1/3 manufacturing, and 1/3 warehouse use, which
is in accordance with the parking requirements for a spec warehouse building.
Access for the site will utilize two existing curb cuts along Carlson Drive.
The structure has been placed in such a manner as to limit the views into any
loading facility from the residential areas to the east. Screening and landscaping
of this easterly property line will be discussed in the landscaping section.
Grading
This site was previously graded during Edenvale Boulevard construction. There is no
existing vegetation on site except for some lowland cover within the floodplain to
the north. As part of the Planned Unit Development Concept approval for this site,
the first floor elevation was to be kept low at approximately 905, in order to
maintain a low profile for the residential areas to the east and south. The
proposed building is at an elevation of 901.5, conforming to this requirement.
Berming has been provided along Edenvale Boulevard to adequately screen the parking
and drive-up doors from Edenvale Boulevard and the residential areas to the south.
However, revisions to the grading will need to take place near the intersection of
Carlson Drive and Edenvale Boulevard, and along the Carlson Drive frontage to
adequately screen views into the parking area and drive-up doors. A portion of the
proposed grading encroaches into the floodplain to the north.
Utilities
Utilities are available to the site with connection to the existing lines along
Carlson Drive. The proponent has proposed an on-site storm sewer system which
directs the water to an existing ponding area to the north of the site.
Arch itecture
The majority of the proposed building is 18 feet in height, with the southwest
corner of the building increasing to a height of 3D feet. Proposed construction
materials consist of pre-fabricated concrete tilt-up panels, glass, and stucco entry
canopies. City Code requires that any pre-cast concrete units be integrally treated
with an applied decorative material or texture. Prior to City Council review,
proponent should submit a sample of this material to Staff for review.
A rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan has not been submitted for review at
this time. Prior to Council review, proponent shall submit a detailed plan
indicating the location and type of construction for these screening units.
LaVonne Industrial Park, Building III 3 April 24, 1987
Landscaping
A total of 165 caliper inches have been provided for this site, which meets the Code
requirement for this size building. However, due to the proximity of the building
and parking to the adjacent residential area to the east, Staff would recommend that
the proponent maximize berming and plantings along the east property line in an
effort to create an adequate buffer. Although the berming along the east property
is built up along the building, Staff would recommend that evergreen trees from 12
to 14 feet in height be placed along the east in order to break up the views of the
building and to screen the parking and loading facilities. (See Attachment B)
Additional screening will also be necessary along Carlson Drive to screen the
parking and to break up views into the drive-up door facilities, and along the north
property to screen the loading docks from Carlson Drive.
Ni in-place sanitary sewer line and easement exists along the north property line of
this site. The landscape plan indicates a number of tree plantings within this
easement. The Engineering Department has indicated that planting in the easement
will be allowed; however, they recormiend that the plantings be shifted to the north
so as not to be planted directly over the sewer line.
Lighting
Since this property abuts a near-by residential area, no lighting should be placed
along the east side of the building and the use of parking lighting should be of a
down-cast variety with a maximum height of 20 feet to limit off-site glare.
RESIDENTIAL LOTS
Background
During the review of the PUD Concept in 1982, the inclusion of three residential
lots to the south of Edenvale Boulevard took place in order to provide transition to
the existing Industrial area. While the platting of these lots was approved, the
required zoning did not take place. The east half of this area is zoned Rural, the
west half is zoned 1-2. Access to these lots will be from the northerly extension
of Manchester Lane. An existing cul-de-sac abuts the property to the south. The
lots vary in size from 0.77 acres to 1.1 acres, slightly larger than the R1-22 lots
to the south.
Grading and lit lutes
The site consists mainly of some scattered elms and other scrub vegetation with a
stand of mature oak trees along the west side. Grading of these lots should be done
in such a manner to preserve the oak trees located to the west and to provide an
adequate buffering berm along Edenvale Boulevard to screen from the industrial area
to the north. Prior to any building permit issuance for these lots, a detailed
grading plan shall be submitted for review. Utilities are available to this site
with connection to services in Edenvale Boulevard.
Access
Access to the property will be from the north extension of Manchester Lane where an
existing cul-de-sac is in place. Access from this cul-de-sac could be accormlished
LaVonne Industrial Park, Building III 4 April 24, 1987
with each lot having its own driveway leading to the cul-de-sac, or with one
driveway utilizing a shared access agreement. Should a shared access be utilized, a
cross-access agreement will need to be recorded at Hennepin County. No access shall
be allowed to Edenvale Boulevard.
STAFF RECOMENDATIONS
Staff would reconmend approval of the request for Site Plan Review within a 1-2
District on approximately 3.34 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 on
1.2 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-22 on 2 acres and from 1-2 to R1-
22 on 1.3 acres acres based on plans dated April 13, 1987, subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report, dated April 24, 1987, and subject to the
following:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Make revisions to the parking setbacks as indicated on Attachment A.
B. Revise the grading plan to increase berming at the intersection of
Carlson Drive and Edenvale Boulevard and along Carlson Drive to
adequately screen the views into the parking area and drive-up
doors. (Attachment B)
C. Submit a sample of the pre-cast material to determine if it meets
City Code.
D. Submit a detailed rooftop mechanical screening plan indicating the
location and type of construction for the screening units.
E. Revise the landscape plan to accomplish the following: 1) maximize
the screening of the parking and loading area along the east
property line by increasing the height of the evergreen plantings to
12 to 14 feet, 2) demonstrate adequate screening of the parking and
drive-up doors along Carlson Drive, and the loading docks from
Carlson Drive, and 3) shift the plantings within the sewer easement
to the north so as not to be directly over the sewer line.
2. Prior to Building permit, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off, erosion control, and utility
plans for review by the City Engineer and Watershed District.
B. Submit a detailed grading plan for the three residential lots which
indicates the preservation of the existing stand of oak trees and
provides a berm along Edenvale Boulevard for screening of the area
to the north.
C. If a shared access is to be used for the three residential lots,
prepare and record a cross-access agreement at Hennepin County.
D. Submit site lighting details for review.
E. Submit building material samples and colors for review.
F. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
G. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading. 1
,eu4.11.
attachment a
SETBACKS FOR PARKING
rlo—T4'—ifiergreens_ PROPOSED BUILDING L ANDSCA PE AND SCREENING nms,ri.00a cLEv. • 9015
Planning Commission Minutes 10 April 27, 1987
D. LAVONNE INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS II AND III, by LaVonne Industrial Park
Partnership. Request for Site Plan Review within the 1-2 District
on 7.84 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 on 1.2
acres, from Rural to RI-22 on 2.0 acres, and from 1-2 to RI-22 on
1.3 acres for construction of 95,100 square feet of industrial space
within two buildings together with 3 single family lots. Location:
East of Chicago Northwestern Railroad, north of Stratford Road and
west of Leesborough Avenue. A public meeting.
Mr. Jim Noreen, representing proponent, reviewed the plans with the
Commission. He pointed out that the property had received approval for 1-2
zoning previously, but that the developer's agreement on the property
required that the City review the site plan for the property prior to
issuance of any building permits. Mr. Noreen pointed out that a small
portion of the property was being zoned from 1-2 to R1-22 for single family
lots to abut the adjacent single family neighborhood.
Mr. Noreen then reviewed the architectural details of both buildings
proposed for the development, as well as the landscaping and screening
planned for the properties.
Planner Kipp reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report
Planning Commission Minutes
11 April 27, 1987
of April 24, 1987, regarding the development p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
.
H
e
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
t
h
e
history of the zoning on the property.
Planner Kipp stated that Staff was recommending th
a
t
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
e
r
l
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
the LaVonne Industrial Park II property be clos
e
d
,
a
n
d
t
h
a
t
b
e
r
m
i
n
g
b
e
continued across the access area in order
t
o
p
r
e
v
e
n
t
m
i
x
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
residential traffic in the Tanager Creek neighb
o
r
h
o
o
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
traffic of this development. He added that one o
t
h
e
r
m
a
j
o
r
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
w
a
s
t
h
a
t
there be a perpetual cross access easement provid
e
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
i
s
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
and proposed LaVonne Industrial Park III, with
p
r
o
o
f
o
f
f
i
l
i
n
g
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
t
o
the City.
Regarding LaVonne Industrial Park III, Planne
r
K
i
p
p
e
x
p
l
a
i
n
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
majority of the property had already been zoned 1
-
2
b
y
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
C
i
t
y
a
c
t
i
o
n
;
however, there was a small triangle of property
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
z
o
n
e
d
R
u
r
a
l
f
o
r
which the proponents were requesting rezoning t
o
1
-
2
.
H
e
n
o
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
r
e
were also recommendations for the following chang
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
phase three: revisions to the parking setbacks,
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
,
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
o
f
the overhead door and rooftop mechanical equip
m
e
n
t
,
a
n
d
r
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
landscaping and screening plan for the site.
With respect to the proposed residential portion o
f
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
P
l
a
n
n
e
r
Kipp stated that the three lots proposed would al
l
h
a
v
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
M
a
n
c
h
e
s
t
e
r
Lane, south of the property. He pointed out tha
t
i
t
m
a
y
b
e
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
f
o
r
the lots to share a driveway access in the fu
t
u
r
e
,
d
u
e
t
o
t
h
e
n
a
r
r
o
w
frontages of the parcels. Planner Kipp explained
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
h
a
d
b
e
e
n
platted previously, but that frontage requireme
n
t
s
h
a
d
b
e
e
n
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
b
y
Code changes since that time.
Of major concern for the residential lots was t
h
e
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
s
.
Planner Kipp stated that it would be necessary th
a
t
t
h
e
l
o
t
s
b
e
g
r
a
d
e
d
a
n
d
restored to prevent erosion on the properties.
Hallett asked if tenants had been identified for
t
h
e
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
.
Mr. Loren Brueggemann, representing proponent, s
t
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
were approximately 30% leased at this time.
Fell asked about the texture of the wall panels
t
o
b
e
u
s
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
e
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
of the industrial buildings. Mr. Noreen explain
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
y
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
b
o
a
r
d
and batten with random texture to look like woo
d
.
F
e
l
l
a
s
k
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
s
e
w
e
r
e
tip-up panels. Mr. Noreen responded that they
w
e
r
e
.
F
e
l
l
a
s
k
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
h
e
intentions of the proponents for screening of th
e
m
e
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
.
M
r
.
Noreen explained that a wood structure would be
u
s
e
d
t
o
s
c
r
e
e
n
t
h
e
r
o
o
f
t
o
p
mechanical units and that the it would be sta
i
n
e
d
t
o
m
a
t
c
h
t
h
e
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
building color scheme.
Fell asked what type of soils existed on the
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
M
r
.
B
r
u
e
g
g
e
m
a
n
n
responded that the majority of the property was g
r
a
v
e
l
,
a
v
e
r
y
s
o
l
i
d
b
a
s
e
.
Mr. Robert McGovern, 6519 Leesborough Avenue, s
t
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
h
e
w
a
s
c
u
r
i
o
u
s
about the driveways planned for the single fam
i
l
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
o
t
s
.
M
r
.
Brueggemann stated that they had wanted to leave
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
o
p
e
n
t
o
t
h
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
who would purchase the lots. He stated that t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
n
o
t
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
developers and would be selling the lots. Planne
r
K
i
p
p
e
x
p
l
a
i
n
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
Planning Commission Minutes 12 April 27, 1987
lots had approximately 40-50 ft. of frontage each on the Manchester Lane
cul-de-sac. He pointed out that one of the recommendations of the Staff
Report was that the driveway design be reviewed by Staff prior to issuance
of any building permits. He stated that this could be done prior to Council
review, if the Commission desired to make such a recommendation. Mr.
Brueggemann stated that he had no objection to preparing this prior to
Council action.
Ruebling asked whether the frontage for proposed Lot 2 of the residential
portion of the proposal was adequate. Planner Kipp explained that the
frontage met City Code requirements at the time it was platted in 1982.
Chairman Schuck stated that he felt it was necessary that the driveway
access situation be resolved prior to City Council review. Hallett
concurred.
MOTION 1;
Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Anderson, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of LaVonne Industrial Park Partnership for
site plan review within the 1-2 District on 7.84 acres, for LaVonne
Industrial Park II based on plans dated April 13, 1987, subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 24, 1987.
Motion carried--7-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Anderson, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of LaVonne Industrial Park Partnership for
Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 Park on 1.2 acres for LaVonne
Industrial Park III based on plans dated April 13, 1987, subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 13, 1987, subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 24, 1987.
Motion carried--7-0-0
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Anderson, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of LaVonne Industrial Park Partnership for
Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-22 on 2.0 acres, and from 1-2 Park
to R1-22 on 1.3 acres for three single family lots, based on plans dated
April 13, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report of April
24, 1987, and subject to the following: a) Plans for driveway access to
Manchester Lane be submitted prior to City Council review of the proposal;
and b) Revised grading plans, including erosion control and site restoration
information, be submitted to the City for review prior to City Council
review.
Motion carried--7-0-0
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. #87-121
A RESOLUTION N4ENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive
Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and,
WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review
and comment; and,
WHEREAS, the proposal of Faith Church of the Nazarene for development of
Faith Church of the Nazarene for Church use requires the amendment of the Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: approximately 5.87
acres located south of County Road #1, east of Blossom Road be modified from Low
Density Residential to Church.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 19th day of May, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #87-122
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF
FAITH CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Faith Church of the Nazarene, dated May 14, 1987,
consisting of 5.87 acres into one lot for construction of a church, a copy of which
is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of
the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is
herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 19th day of May, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
/ \)'-')6G Oa; \Jt \ )10 141-`0 (1'1 •—oeir 4z--Z rt ,L045- cw(7/ h L2- eg- 41'1 196 01 -ro Ls1-9z---i, 9—h F.• z,,,s ) ?0,7 tf-ett-11/4 Cer157-1/' e r‘ 01/ ' viGp uoo V—Crtfil 71' 'ff,y /5 ceiszh., -Ay Lv (4,z it .111-41. Pelkaa kir DIAL 21.9 72),) 11.14.44 1,9 co.1,111 nzDe-21 QA)12-e) I/ Qs s 019 -a) IS ‘D I Ter3 L.14 Or) .52 Ithc-03 421-Wpal cr&DII Lci 5 pi Tv ci:YD CLL )Varteal YtAsto 9 riN,32. (lEn yna 34.1 Qh. row sodP reS Te5-RtrA.E1 "-An /51.4"id 49,." Is -tr-k r777. (nom 5-110a cson 11.t. •27 774 4 7?-T Pt 7: 28- _tr-7i, poso/ cer-fq-.J"--dr-vgq-Jr- -7-try r*Lari-Yz6a/ 4:0/; oaf/ 6167/ -2fo Or" --ILL ----1773-2/772W '-'32rg A frc- rot •/ S ()col Q_CbC EV401 SA 40j \150 s-r\ Qa Q1 Frs_e-860\1
xe4,tit_
Aleuzet No
r)1C2;4
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
TRTUGH:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
May 14, 1987
SITE IMPROVEMENTS - FAITH CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE
The church has recently approached the City Staff with a request to ph
a
s
e
s
i
t
e
improvements in order to minimize their first year cost. The following
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
discussed and is acceptable both to the church and the City Staff:
1. Concurrent with building construction the church would complete all t
h
e
grading and berming required as per the approved plan.
2. Plantings could be phased over a 3-year period backed by an Irrevocab
l
e
Letter of Credit or bond for a 150% of the construction costs.
3. Concurrent with building construction, a bituminous surface would
b
e
required to meet the current parking demands of the church. Proof-o
f
-
parking must be provided on-site to meet the ordinance requirements an
d
could be constructed out of gravel at this time. The gravel proof-of
-
parking areas must be converted to a bituminous surface within three years
.
A bond or Irrevocable Letter of Credit for 150% of the total cost
a
bitumious surface would be required at the time of building permit issuance.
CITY OFFICES /7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE / EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344-2499 / TELEPHONE (612) 937.2262
May 4, 1987
Mr. Robert Balcome
Birch Designers & Builders
P.O. Box 2
Zion, Illinois 60099
Dear Mr. Balcome:
As we discussed on Friday, May 1st, the Planning Commission had recommended appr
o
v
a
l
of the Faith Church of the Nazarene, subject to revisions in the site plan t
o
b
e
completed prior to the review by the City Council. Enclosed find a copy of
t
h
e
Staff Report dated April 24, 1987, and a graphic which depicts one alternative
w
a
y
,
in which the Planning Commission concerns for transition and down playing the vi
s
u
a
l
impact of the parking lot could be achieved.
To summarize, the changes in the plan would include:
1) Shifting the parking and building approximately 20 feet to the west,
which leaves a 50 foot setback to parking along the east property
line.
(2) A modification of the grading plan to maximize the berm height along
the east property line, or to an elevation of 865 as shown on the
attached graphic and increasing the berm height along the south side
of the parking lot by a minimum of 7 feet to an elevation of 866.
3) Modify the landscape plan to provide additional plant materials,
including a mixture of coniferous and shade trees around the
perimeter of the parking lot. The attached graphic indicates one
way in which a mixture of conifers and shade trees can be planted.
4) Submit an overall lighting plan for review with lighting standards
to be a maximum of 20 feet in height and downcast cut-off luminars.
5) The grading plan should depict an 8 foot wide bituminous pad for a
future trail along the north property line.
The above changes in the plan are recommendations by Staff as approved by t
h
e
Planning Commission. The attached graphic represents one way in which
t
h
e
s
e
conditions can be fulfilled. I am sure that there are alternative wa
y
s
o
f
addressing the concerns as listed above, and we would be open to your suggestio
n
s
.
Robert Balcome
May 4, 1987
Page 2
This project is scheduled for review by the City Council on May 19, 1987. We w
o
u
l
d
appreciate the receipt of 12 sets of complete plans including architectur
a
l
,
grading, site plan, and landscaping by Thursday morning May 14, 1987.
If there are any questions and if I may be of further assistance, please do
n
o
t
hesitate to contact my office at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely yours,
City of Eden Prairli)
/ /1
(1112/11
Enclosures: Staff Report dated April 24, 1987
Site Plan Revision May 1, 1987
MDF:bs
Micnaei U. rranzen
Senior Planner
PROPOSED SITE
trAREA /LOCATION H MAP
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
THROUGH: • Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: April 24, 1987
PROJECT: Faith Church of the Nazarene
LOCATION: Between Bennett Place and Sherman Drive, south of County Road #1
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER: Faith Church of the Nazarene
REQUEST: 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential
to Church on 5.875 acres.
2. Zoning District Change from Rural to Public on 5.875 acres.
3. Preliminary Plat of 5.875 acres into one lot.
Background
This 5.875-acre site is depicted on
the Comprehensive Guide Plan as Low
Density Residential for up to 2.5
units per acre. Surrounding Guide
Plan designations include Low
Density Residential to the north,
south, and west, with Medium Density
Residential to the east. Adjacent
land uses include the Eden Bluffs
Townhouses, zoned RM-6.5 to the
east; Bluffs East 2nd Addition,
zoned R1-9.5 to the south; Eden
Prairie Acres, zoned R1-22 to the
west; and, Olympic Hills 4th
Addition, zoned R1-13.5 to the north
across County Road #1.
Comprehensive Guide Plan Change
The Guide Plan has not designated as
many sites in the community for
churches, as have been proposed,
thus many proposed churches require
an amendment to the Comprehensive
Guide Plan. In this situation, the
change in the Comprehensive Guide
Faith Church of the Nazarene 2 April 24, 1987
Plan is not so much as question of the effect on the Comprehensive Guide Plan
balance, since only 15 housing units would be displaced, but rather it is a question
of whether or not this site can be considered as a transition between the 8-unit per
acre densities of the Eden Bluff Townhouses to the east and the low density
residential land uses to the west and south of the site. The success of the site as
a transitional use is dependant upon how well the impacts on-site and the
surrounding uses are mitigated.
Site Plan
The site plan involves the construction of an 8,100 square foot, one-story church,
on 5.875 acres of land at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.03. Building and parking
areas meet the minimum setback requirements from all lot lines for public zoning.
Parking for churches is based upon the seating capacity of the sanctuary at a ratio
of one parking stall per every three seats. The seating capacity of the church is
180 seats; therefore, the parking requirement would be 60 spaces. A total of 82
parking spaces are provided on-site.
Access to this site is from County Road #1. The County has reviewed the proposed
access and has indicated that the driveway entrance meets the minimum site distance
requirements for the posted speed on County Road #1.
Traffic
In reviewing the traffic impacts for this project, Staff took into consideration the
location and amount of traffic that could be generated from this site and other
churches within the area, including the Pax Christi and Prairie Lutheran Churches.
Using a trip generation rate of 0.57 trips per sanctuary seat, a total of 1,014
trips are possible based on 100% occupancy. Current week-day traffic on County Road
#1 is 6,000 trips per day or 600 trips within the p.m. peak hour. The design
capacity of County Road #1 can accommodate the Sunday church trips. The question of
traffic on County Road #1 is not a question of the ability of the roadway to handle
the volume of the traffic, but rather it is the ability of the intersections to
handle the traffic and the turning movement conflicts.
Pax Christi Church at 1,200 seats is generating 684 of the peak hour trips or 67%.
The extension of Homeward Hills Road and County Road #1 should reduce the amount of
traffic on County Road #1. In addition, Bennett Place and Blossom Road will be
upgraded as a result of the feasibility study ordered by the City Council. This
would include left and right-turn lanes and bypass lanes at the intersection of
Bennett Place and County Road #1 and the realignment of Blossom Road to a 90-degree
angle intersection directly opposite Spoon Ridge Drive on County Road #1. All of
these improvements coupled with the proposed turn lanes with the Faith Nazarene
Church should help reduce potential traffic congestion and turning movement problems
during concurrent church services on Sunday.
Visual Transition
The church and the parking lot will be visible from surrounding land uses. To
better screen the views from the adjoining area, the following changes should be
made in the plan:
1. The building and parking areas should be shifted approximately 20 feet to
the west which would provide a 50-foot setback to parking along the east
ti=36
Faith Church of the Nazarene 3 April 24, 1987
property line. This will allow for the berm to be increased from 4 to 8
feet in height and would provide more room for plant materials. The berming
will help screen the views of the parking lot from the first-story windows
of the adjoining townhomes; however, additional shade trees and conifers
will be needed to downplay the view of the parking area from the second-
story windows.
2. The berm along the south side of the parking lot should be increased by a
minimum of seven feet. This, coupled with a 400-foot setback between the
parking and the adjoining homes to the south of the site on Jackson Drive,
should effectively screen the parking areas.
3. Views of the parking area and church from the west cannot be mitigated
through berming because of the large depression. Screening of the parking
areas and church will have to rely upon plant materials. There should be a
mixture of conifer and shade trees to provide for year-round screening along
the western edge of the parking lot.
Grading
Overall grading can be described as minimal and working with the natural contours of
the property. Approximately 1.3 acres of the site is being utilized for the church
and parking. The remaining 4.5 acres would be undeveloped. The large depression on
the western side of the property and in the southeast corner are being retained in
their natural state.
Landscaping
As mentioned in the visual transition section, additional berming and plantings will
be necessary to downplay the views of the parking lot and the church from the
adjoining residential properties.
Lighting
No lighting plan has been submitted for review at this time. Since this site is
adjacent to residential properties, the lighting should be a maximum of 20 feet in
height and should be downcast cut-off luminars. The lighting should also be
situated to keep all of the glare from the lights on-site. Prior to Council review,
proponent shall submit an overall lighting plan.
Architecture
The proposed one-story building will be constructed out of facebrick and glass. The
building will have a sloped roof constructed of shingles. The building will 23 feet
high. For Public zoning, the ordinance will allow a maximum height of 30 feet. A
25-foot spire is proposed on top of the roof. City Code would allow a maximum spire
height of 25 feet.
Utilities
Sewer and water service can be extended to this site by connection to existing
'acilities along County Road #1.
Storm water run-off is proposed to drain in a southerly direction through a series
of catch basins and storm sewer pipe into the ponding area in the southeast corner
of the property.
Faith Church of the Nazarene 4 April 24, 1987
Bikeways
The master trail system plan depicts an eight-foot bituminous trail along the south
side of County Road #1. Concurrent with building construction, the proponent should
grade an eight-foot wide pad for the trail along the north property line. The City
will complete the bituminous layer in the future.
Conclusions
The decision to change the Comprehensive Guide Plan from Low Density Residential to
Church is dependent upon the appropriateness of the site as a transition between the
eight-unit per acre densities on the east and the surrounding 2.5-unit per acre
densities on the west and south. The Staff Report suggested ways in which the plan
could be modified to improve the visual transition to the adjoining residential
properties and to lessen the visual impact of the church and the parking lot.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff presents the following courses of action for Commission
consideration:
If the Planning Commission feels that the use of this site is appropriate for a
church, and with revisions in the site plan to improve visual transition would make
the project fit in better with the surrounding neighborhood, then one option would
be to approve the request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density
Iesidential to Church, Zoning District Change from Rural to Public, and a
Preliminary Plat based upon the plans dated April 13, 1987, subject to the
recommendations in the Staff Report dated April 24, 1987, and subject to the
following conditions:
1. Prior to Counci review, proponent shall:
A. Mbdify the site plan to shift the parking and building approximately
20 feet to the west leaving a 50-foot setback to parking along the
east property line.
B. Modify the grading plan to maximize the berm height along the east
property line and increase the berm height along the south side of
the parking lot by 7 feet.
C. Mbdify the landscape plan to provide additional plant materials
including a mixture of coniferous and shade trees around the
perimeter of the parking lot to better screen the parking areas and
downplay the visual impacts off-site.
D. Submit an overall lighting plan for review. Lighting standards
shall be a maximum of 20 feet in height and downcast cut-off
luminars.
E. Modify the site plan to provide for an eight-foot wide bituminous
trail along the north property line.
Faith Church of the Nazarene 5 April 24, 1987
2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off, utilities, and erosion control
plans for review by the City Engineer.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
B. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading.
C. Submit samples of proposed exterior building materials and lighting
standards for review.
D. Submit plans for review by the Fire Marshal.
4. Concurrent with building construction, proponent shall:
A. Grade an eight-foot wide pad for a future trail along the north
property line.
5. Proponent shall obtain an entrance permit from the Hennepin County Highway
Department for access onto the County Road.
If the Planning Commission feels that the site is not appropriate for a church and
that the impacts upon the adjoining land uses are high, then one option would be to
recommend denial of the project as proposed.
If the Planning Commission feels that additional changes are warranted in the plan
to make the site fit in better with the surrounding neighborhood, then one option
would be to return the development plans to the proponent for revisions.
B. FAITH CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment from Low Density Residential to Church on 5.87 acres with
a variance for building height, Zoning District Change from Rural to
Public, and Preliminary Platting of 5.87 acres into one lot for
construction of a church. Location: South of County Road #1, east
of Blossom Road. A public hearing.
Mr. David Frisbee, pastor for the church, stated that they had attempted to
comply with all City requirements regarding the design of the use. He
pointed out that there would be approximately 4.5 acres of the property
which would remain undeveloped, with only 1.3 acres subject to construction
for the church and parking area.
Planner Franzen stated that one of the major considerations for the proposed
development was the requested change to the Comprehensive Guide Plan for
amendment from Low Density Residential to Church. In this regard, he stated
that the Commission would need to evaluate the proposal in terms of its
impact on the surrounding existing neighborhoods.
Planner Franzen stated that the Staff review of the project included
consideration of what the residents in the existing neighborhood would be
viewing from their properties. He stated that some of the recommendations
focused on downplaying views of the parking lot from the adjacent properties
in order to provide adequate transition between the differing uses. He
stated that the homes on Jackson Drive would be approximately 400 ft. away
from the parking lot for the church as proposed. It was recommended in the
Staff Report, for example, that the berm between the south side of the
parking lot and the residential neighborhood to the south be increased by
seven feet in height in order to better screen the residents from views of
vehicles in the parking lot.
Mr. Bob Newsome, 10830 Spoon Ridge, stated that he was concerned about the
addition of a church to this neighborhood. He said that the addition of
Planning Commission Minutes 4 April 27, 1987
this church would mean that there were three churches within one mile of
each other along County Road #1, all in the vicinity of his neighborhood,
which would mean major traffic congestion on County Road #1 on Sunday
mornings. Mr. Newsome stated that it appeared that the churches in the area
would only be growing, not maintaining, in membership as time passed, based
on his experience with his own church. He added that he felt this could
only mean an increase in the traffic already on the road.
Mr. Newsome stated that he believed that the large volume of traffic would
negatively impact the quality of life in his neighborhood. He presented the
City with a petition signed by owners of 22 of the 26 homes on Spoon Ridge
expressing their concerns about the traffic.
Mr. Doug Moran, 10788 Jackson Drive, stated that there was a large amount of
construction taking place on the south side of County Road #1 at this time,
that it was one of the bigger growth areas in Eden Prairie. He expressed
concern about the impact of traffic on County Road #1 from this entire area
just from residential construction and added that he shared the concerns of
Mr. Newsome regarding traffic for one more church.
Mr. Moran stated that he was also concerned about the weeds growing on this
property. He asked if the developers would be responsible for upkeep of the
property, including removal of weeds, if the development was allowed.
Planner Franzen responded that all areas that wre proposed to be graded
would be required to be sodded, or seeded, after grading. In addition, he
stated that the City Code provided for weed control and that the property
owner would be responsible for weed control.
Mr. Moran asked if it would be possible to lower the speed limit on County
Road #1 considering the amount of development in the area, or if it would be
possible to have stop lights installed at County Road #1 and Frani° Road.
Planner Franzen indicated that the County did not have plans within their
five-year improvement program to upgrade County Road #1. However, their
long-range thinking was that the road may be expanded to four lanes with
signals at major intersections. Planner Franzen added that the traffic
study by BRW prepared for the Bluff Country Planned Unit Development in this
area indicated that the Franlo Road intersection with County Road #1 should
be signalized by 1990 because of traffic projected for that area by that
time.
Planner Franzen also referred to improvements planned by the City which
would help to improve the traffic movements in this area. He stated that
right and left turn lanes at Bennett Place and a cul-de-sac at Blossom Road
were currently being reviewed via a feasibility study, the results of which
would be reported to the Council in the near future.
Mr. Moran stated that he had one other major concern, that being the parking
of vehicles on County Road #1 during Sunday services at the churches. He
stated that this was already a problem at Pax Christi Church and that he
believed it could be a potential problem with the Prairie Lutheran Church
currently under construction, and this church proposed. Mr. Moran added
that his concerns regarding the previous proposal for multiple family
residential use on this property was with respect to parking and the
problems it appeared to cause in the locations proposed.
Planning Commission Minutes 5 April 27, 1987
Mr. Steve Byro, 10760 Jackson Drive, stated that he concurred with the
concerns of the previous speakers. He asked what considerations had been
given to buffering the residential neighorhood to the south from the parking
area. Planner Franzen explained that Staff had taken sight lines in the
field and, based upon those sight lines, had made a recommendation to
increase the berm height between the property owners to the south and the
parking area for the church.
Mr. Byro asked if the parking lot could be relocated to be close to County
Road #1, instead of the church structure being closer to County Road #1, or
to "flip-flop" the parking and the structure in order to have the parking be
even further away from the residents. Planner Franzen explained that the
residents south of the proposed development would not be able to see the
parking lot if the recommendations for additional berm height were followed.
Further, if the church structure were to be located closer to the residents,
instead, the structure would be much more visible to the residents than it
would be by the plan as proposed.
Mr. Mike Levi, 10943 Spoon Ridge, stated that on Sunday mornings, Pax
Christi usually had one, or two, officers directing traffic in order for it
to be managable between services. He questioned how many more officers
would be necessary in order for traffic to be tolerable on County Road #1 on
Sundays.
Mr. Levi also asked about the speed limit allowed on County Road #1. He
pointed out that, in Bloomington, County Road #1 traffic was allowed only at
30 miles per hour, whereas it was 50 miles per hour in Eden Prairie. He
suggested that the speed limit be reduced in Eden Prairie, as well.
Mr. Newsome pointed out that the volume of traffic on County Road #1 on
Sunday mornings was similar to rush hour traffic during the week. He stated
that he did not feel that this was what the City should be allowing to
happen in this residential neighborhood.
Anderson stated that he shared the concerns of the residents regarding
traffic. He stated that he felt the problem was significant at the time
Prairie Lutheran Church was reviewed, as well. He added that he did not
feel this was an acceptable condition for this residential area.
Hallett asked if the traffic resulting from Pax Christi would be alleviated
by the completion of Homeward Hills Road. Planner Franzen stated that this
would provide a significant change for the better in traffic patterns for
this area. Hallett stated that it was important to realize that road
improvements followed development, and that development should not be
stopped, especially if it was known that the improvements were underway,
such as Homeward Hills Road. He added that he believed that County Road #1
was an appropriate location for a church and that, with the recommendations
for changes in landscaping and screening, this proposal could provide a good
transition to the residential area to the south. Hallett pointed out that
there were four churches within less one mile of the County Road #4 and
Highway #5 intersection.
Fell asked if the parking provided on the property was adequate for the
church's use, or whether there would be "spill over" onto County Road #1
Planning Commission Minutes 6 April 27, 1987
from this parking lot, as well. Planner Franzen stated that the church had
provided the number of parking spaces required by City Code on the property.
Fell asked if the other churches on County Road fl had been designed at the
same formula. Planner Franzen stated that they had used the same formula.
He noted that the plans approved for Pax Christi included expansion of
parking onto other portions of the property. These expansion areas had not
yet been constructed.
Anderson stated that he was concerned that the parking needs for the church
not be underestimated.
Fell asked if it may be necessary to re-evaluate the formula used for
determining the amount of parking for churches. He stated that he did not
believe it was appropriate to continue using the formula if it was proving
itself to be inadequate. Planner Franzen stated that Staff could do this
and he suggested that it may be appropriate to request a "proof of parking"
area on the property should the need arise for accommodation of overflow
parking in the future.
Fell stated that he concurred with Hallett, that the City should not stop
development since it was known that the road system would be improved.
However, he added that he felt it was also important to control potential
future hazards and to protect the residents.
Ruebling asked what the size of the congregation was currently. Pastor
Frisbee responded that there were currently 75 families that were members.
He added that the philosophy of the church was more intimate, that they
liked being small because everyone knew each other and that they intended to
stay small in the future. Expansion, of any kind, would be at a different
location, not at this site.
Hallett stated that it appeared that the other churches approved along
County Road #1 were more regional in service, as opposed to small like this
church. He stated that he was aware that it was the philosophy of some
congregations to remain small, but that this was clearly not the intent of
the two other churches on County Road #1.
Bye stated that she shared the concerns of the residents and the other
Commissioners regarding traffic. She stated that she felt it was
unfortunate that the road improvements did not happen at the time of
development, but that the City was not in control of the improvement
schedules for the County, or State and had to abide by their timing on
matters such as this. Bye added that she felt the Staff Report
recommendations regarding the transition to the south were important, also,
and that the residents should be protected by the recommended changes.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Ruebling, to close the public
hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes 7 April 27, 1987
Motion carried--7-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Hallett, esconded by Ruebling, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Faith Church of the Nazarene for
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Church
for 5.87 acres with variances for building height, based on plans dated
April 13, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated
April 24, 1987.
Motion carried--6-1-0 (Anderson against)
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Ruebling, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Faith Church of the Nazarene for Zoning
District Change from Rural to Public for 5.87 acres for construction of a
church, based on plans dated April 13, 1987, subject to the recommendations
of the Staff Report dated April 24, 1987, with the addition of the
following: a) Prior to Council review, proponents design a "proof of
parking" area on the site for overflow parking in the future; and b) No
parking shall be allowed on County Road #1.
Motion carried--6-1-0 (Anderson against)
MOTION 4:
Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Ruebling, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Faith Church of the Nazarene for
Preliminary Plat of 5.87 acres into one lot for construction of a church,
based on plans dated April 13, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the
Staff Report dated April 24, 1987, with the addition of the following: a)
Prior to Council review, proponents design a "proof of parking" area on the
site for overflow parking in the future; and b) No parking shall be allowed
on County Road #1.
Motion carried--6-1-0 (Anderson against)
Anderson stated that he voted against due to concerns regarding the traffic
congestion on County Road #1.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-123
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE RIDGEWOCO WEST 6TH
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT
TO THE OVERALL RIDGEWOOD WEST PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for
the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located within the City; a
n
d
,
WHEREAS, the Ridgewood West 6th development is considered a proper amendment
to the overall Ridgewood West Planned Unit Development Concept; and,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the
request of Centex Homes Corporation for PUD Concept Amendment approval
t
o
t
h
e
overall Ridgewood West Planned Unit Development Concept for the Ridgewood W
e
s
t
6
t
h
development and recommended approval of the PUD Concept Amendment to th
e
C
i
t
y
Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on May 19, 1987;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Ridgewood West 6th development PUD Concept Amendment, being in
Hennepin County, Minnesota, and legally described as outlined in
Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PhD Concept Amendment approval to
the overall Ridgewood West Planned Unit Development Concept as
outlined in the application materials for Ridgewood West 6th.
3. That the PUD Concept Amendment meets the recommendations of the
Planning Commission dated April 27, 1987.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 19th day of May, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
It ?,c
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #87-124
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RIDGEWOOD WEST 6TH FOR
CENTEX HCMES CORPORATION
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Ridgewood West 6th for Centex Homes Corporation, dated
April 22, 1987, consisting of 8.1 acres into 55 lots and 10 outlots for construction
of 55 townhouse units, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be
In conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting
ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 19th day of May, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
I t qJ
217 ss,
R M -2.5 ' `f2M-6 5
t
1 :25. 7:1:7
PROPOSED SITE
s,\ \—r
I/
AREA LOCATION MO'
RP/
STAFF REPORT
Planning Cornnission
Donald R. Jram, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
April 24, 1987
Ridgewood West 6th Addition
North and east of Wellington Drive, north and west of Cumberland
Road.
Centex Homes Midwest, Inc.
1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on approximately
101 acres.
2. Zoning District Change from R1-13.5 to RM-6.5 on 8.1 acres.
3. Preliminary Plat of 8.1 acres into 55 lots and 10 outlots
for construction of 55 townhouse units.
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPL ICANT/
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Background
This site is currently designated on
the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide
Plan for Medium Density Residential
land uses. Surrounding Guide Plan
designations include Low Density
Residential and Medium Density
Residential to the north, Medium
Density Residential to the west and
south, and Anderson Lakes Parkway
and Public Open Space to the east.
Specific land uses include the
Ridgewood West 5th Addition, zoned
R1-9.5 to the west and south;
Westover Woods, zoned R1-13.5 to the
south; Deer Creek Phases I and II,
zoned R1-13.5 and R1-9.5
respectively to the north; and,
Anderson Lakes Parkway to the east.
The proponent is current ly re-
quest ing a Zoning District Change
from R1-13.5 to RM-6.5 and the
Ridgewood West 6th Addition 2 April 24, 1987
Preliminary Platting of 8.1 acres to allow for the construction of 55 townhouse
units.
Planned Unit Development Amendment
This property is the last undeveloped parcel of the original Ridgewood West single
family subdivision approved in 1978. Amendments since that time included the
request for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium
Density Residential on approximately 64 acres. This amendment involved the
construction of 168 single family cluster homes and 168 condominium units. The 1982
Planned Unit Development identified this 8.1 acre site for 96 condominium units made
up of eight, 12 and 16-unit buildings.
The plan which was previously reviewed on December 8, 1986, included a change from
the 96 multiple family units to a total of 76 multiple family units made up of
eleven, 4 and 8-unit buildings. This plan depicted an overall density reduction
from approximately 11.85 units per acre to approximately 9.38 units per acre but was
unacceptable in terms of access, parking, architecture, density, and transition to
surrounding land uses. The current plan includes a reduction from the originally
approved concept plan of 41 units (55 townhouse units proposed) for an overall
density of 6.7 units per acre. In addition, this plan has attempted to address
those concerns previously presented.
Site Plan
The proposed site plan depicts a total of twelve, 4, 5, and 6-unit buildings located
off a private loop road system which provides a connection from Cumberland Road to
Wellington Drive. One of the 4-unit buildings will have direct access onto
Wellington Drive. In addition, one, 4-unit building, and one, 5-unit building will
have access off Cumberland Road in direct alignment with Brookshire Lane.
Minimum requirements of the RM-6.5 zoning district include a front yard setback of
30 feet, a side yard setback of 25 feet and a rear yard setback of 20 feet. The
site plan has been designed to meet the minimum requirements of the RM-6.5 zoning
district. Setbacks to the adjacent properties and roadways include a minimum of a
30-foot setback along Wellington Drive, 38 feet along Cumberland Road, 52 feet along
the western property line, and 37 feet to the north property line. The 6-unit
building which is oriented in an east-west direction along the northerly property
line maintains a minimum setback of 60 feet. Setbacks to adjacent homes range from
approximately 75 feet along the western property line to approximately 95 feet along
the north property line. As depicted by site sections A through F, transition to
the adjacent single family neighborhoods is proposed through the use of large
setbacks in conjunction with berming and plantings.
Grading
This site was originally graded in 1979 consistent with the single family plan.
Currently this site is being used for a stock pile area due to the construction of
Cumberland Road and the adjacent Westover Woods project. The proposed grading plan
shows a high point of 886 along the northern property line to be done in cooperation
with the adjacent property owner in order to provide a berm area between the tv.o
projects. In addition, the proponent has provided a number of berms along the
western property line and adjacent roadways to help screen views into the site.
Ridgewood West 6th Addition 3 April 24, 1987
Landscaping
Based upon a total building square footage of approximately 71,500 square feet, a
total of 224 caliper inches of landscaping material is required. The landscape plan
depicts a total of 403.5 caliper inches. The proponent is using a number of 6, 8,
10, and 12-foot evergreen trees which are planted in conjunction with berming along
the northern and westerly property line to provide an additional landscaped buffer
between the townhouse project and the existing single family development.
Due to the location of the private loop road accessing Wellington Drive, concern has
been raised regarding the number of headlights shining into the adjacent single
family residences across the street. Because of this, some mitigating measure shall
be taken which could include additional landscaping, berming, and/or fencing. The
proponent shall provide a screening plan prior to Council review.
Utilities
Water and sanitary sewer service is available to the site through connections made
to an existing 6-inch water line and an 8-inch sanitary sewer line, located in
Cumberland Road and Wellington Drive. Storm water drainage is primarily in a
easterly direction with connections made to a 21-inch storm sewer pipe in Cunterland
Road. All proposed utility connections shall be made at the intersection of Essex
Courts and Cumberland Road.
Arch itecture
The proposed architecture of the 4, 5, and 6-unit buildings (Victoria and
Williamsburg building styles) attempts to maintain the residential style of the
adjacent single family residences. These units contain a gross square footage of
approximately 1,300 square feet per unit and range in length from 120 feet for a 4-
unit building to 180 feet for the 6-unit building. Maximum height of the buildings
is 30 feet. All of the buildings have been designed with two-car garages which
allows for a reduction in the number of cars typically parking on the street. The
primary building materials for the proposed units include facebrick and aluminum
siding. The color schemes are coordinated in earth tones and other soft pastel
colors which shall be compatible with the adjacent single family residences. Color
and building material samples will be required prior to building permit issuance.
Pedestrian Systems
There is an existing five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the south side of
Wellington Drive and the plans shall be revised to include a five-foot wide sidewalk
along Cumberland Road. A proposed connection shall be made through the interior of
this site with connections made to the existing and proposed sidewalks. Staff would
recomnend that a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk be placed along the north side of
the private loop road system.
Signage and Lighting
Typically, multi-family projects propose interior project lighting for esthetic and
security reasons. No lighting details have been submitted for review of this
project. Because a loop street within this project is private and the opportunity
for the City to install street lights does not exist, the plan should be revised to
reflect interior lighting locations. There are entrance signs proposed at the
Ridgewood West 6th Addition 4 April 24, 1987
intersections of the private loop road and Cumberland and Wellington Drive. No
details have been submitted at this time; however, will be required prior to permit.
Summary
In the previous Staff Report, a number of issues such as access, parking,
architecture, density, and transition to existing single family neighborhoods were
identified. In response to these concerns, the proponents have since reduced the
density of the projct from the originally approved PUD Concept Plan density of 11.8
units per acre (96 units) to 6.7 units per acre (55 units). In addition, with the
reduction in density and a different unit style (townhome) proposed, the transition
to the adjacent single family residences has been improved by increasing the
setbacks, adding considerable berming and landscaping, and orienting the units to
reduce the massing from adjacent homes. Finally, parking conflicts have been reduced
by adding two-car garages to all units, reducing the number of driveways accessing
the private loop road and orienting a number of units toward the interior.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the project based on plans dated April 24, 1987,
subject to the Staff Report, dated April 24, 1987, and subject to the following
conditions:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Revise the plans to reflect a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along
the north side of the private loop road with the appropriate
connections made to the sidewalk located along Cumberland Drive.
B. Revise the plans to reflect interior lighting locations and any
signage. Details shall be submitted for Staff review.
C. Provide a screening plan for the property across the private loop
road/Wellington Drive intersection.
2. Prior to Final Plat, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off, utility, and erosion control
plans for review by the City Engineer.
3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
B. Submit building material samples and colors for review.
4. Prior to Grading permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading.
B. Stake the construction limits with erosion control fencing.
Planning Commission Minutes
7 April 27, 1987
C. RIDGEWOOD WEST 6TH, by Centex Homes Corporation. Request for
Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on approximately 101
acres, Zoning District change from R1-13.5 to RM-6.5 on 8.1 acres,
and Preliminary Plat of 8.1 acres into 60 lots and 10 outlots for
construction of 55 townhouse units. Location: North and east of
Wellington Drive, north and west of Cumberland Road. A public
hearing.
Planner Dram reported that this development had been before the City
previously in a different form. At that time, the complex background of
this project was discussed. Planner Uram reviewed the facts in this regard
with the Commission.
Planning Commission Minutes 8 April 27, 1987
Mr. Tom Boyce, representing Centex Homes, proponent, reviewed the site
characteristics and project design with the Commission. He explained that
the buildings were now down-scaled to be 4-, 5-, and 6-unit structures. The
density of the development proposal had been reduced from the originally
approved 11.8, to 9.4 as recently seen by the Commission, and now to 6.7
units per acre as currently proposed. He added that proponents were willing
to comply with all recommendations of the Staff Report of April 24, 1987,
regarding the proposal.
Planner Uram reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report
of April 24, 1987. Other than standard recommendations regarding grading,
utilities, park dedication, and streets, the report contained
recommendations regarding sidewalk connections, interior lighting and
signage details, and screening from the existing residential developments in
the vicinity.
Mr. Steve Doms, 13949 Wellington Drive, stated that he believed there was
inconsistency between the zoning and approved Planned Unit Development on
the property. He stated that the property was not surrounded by single
family homes at the time the PUD was approved and, therefore, he felt that
the PUD was no longer valid because these conditions had changed.
Mr. John Ginn, 8961 Knollwood, stated that he was concerned about the
proposed density of the development. He stated that the development was 50%
more dense than the existing cluster homes neighborhood adjacent to the
property. He added that he believed that the units proposed were out of
character with the existing single family neighborhood. Mr. Ginn also
stated that he did not feel the information was readily available regarding
the fact that the property would be developed as multiple family residential
at the time people purchased their homes.
Mr. Ned Devine, 8811 Hawthorne Drive, stated that this development would be
located across the street from large-lot single family homes and would not
be consistent with those homes. He stated that he did not believe that
anyone would object to the property being developed as cluster lots, but
that he did not feel that the multiple family residential units would look
right in this location.
Ruebling asked why multiple structures were being proposed in this location
instead of cluster homes, or some other form of single family residential
unit. He stated that, based on the surrounding existing uses, it appeared
logical that this property be developed as single family, as well. Mr.
Boyce responded that the proponents had made certain economic decisions
based upon the fact that there was an approved Planned Unit Development on
the property for Medium Density Residential development. He noted that the
property to the north had also been guided for Medium Density Residential,
but that the proponents for that property were not able to demonstrate that
screening could take place which would provide for adequate transition to
the single family uses. Mr. Boyce pointed out that the property located on
the other side of Anderson Lakes Parkway was guided for High Density
Residential Development, and had been developed as apartment units. He
added that Anderson Lakes Parkway directly impacted their site, making it
less desirable for single family residential use.
Planning Commission Minutes 9 April 27, 1987
Mr. Boyce stated that the density on the property had been reduced from 96
units originally to 55 units with the current proposal.
Planner Uram explained the proponents were within the limits of the Medium
Density Residential guiding for the property with their proposal. He
compared this to the 5+ units per acre approved for the cluster lot areas
and the 11.8 units approved for this particular parcel with the Planned Unit
Development.
Ruebling asked the proponents if they had considered constructing cluster
homes on this property. Mr. Boyce stated that they had prepared a design
for cluster units on this property, but that it came to only 34 units on the
entire property.
Anderson stated that he did not feel it would be appropriate for the City to
renig on its previous approval for this property. He stated that the City
would not tell any other business that it would not be allowed to occupy a
portion of its structure, once it was approved and that by taking back the
approval for medium density, the City would be asking this business of home
construction not to occupy a portion of what had already been approved for
this property.
Mr. Ginn reiterated his concerns about the approved Planned Unit
Development, stating that he did not believe that it was relevant anymore.
Mr. Robert Adomaitis, 8771 Knollwood Drive, stated that he did not believe
that this residential neighborhood could be compared to a business in the
manner Commissioner Anderson had discussed. He expressed concern that there
would be no transition between the existing single family homes and the
proposed multiple residential of this proposal.
Anderson stated that he did not feel that any level of government should be
changing the rules on any business.
Dodge stated that at the meeting held on the previous proposal on this site,
she had asked if anyone in the audience had contacted the City about the
plans for the property and that no one had done so. Anderson stated that he
had retained an attorney for review of his property purchase.
Mr. Devine stated that he had contacted an attorney at the time of purchase
of his lot and had been told that everything was just fine. He said it
seemed necessary to know what questions to ask.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Anderson, to close the public hearing.
Motion carried--7-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Anderson, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Centex Homes Corporation for Planned Unit
Development Concept Amendment on approximately 101 acres for Ridgewood West
Planning Commission Minutes 10 April 27, 1987
6th Addition for 55 townhouse units, based on revised plans dated April 24,
1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 24,
1987.
Motion carried--6-1-0 (Ruebling against)
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Anderson, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Centex Homes Corporation for Zoning
District Change from R1-13.5 to RN-6.5 on 8.1 acres for Ridgewood West 6th
Addition for construction of 55 townhouse units, based on revised plans
dated April 24, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report
dated April 24, 1987.
Motion carried--6-1-0 (Ruebling against)
MOTION 4:
Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Anderson, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Centex Homes Corporation for Preliminary
Plat of 8.1 acres into 60 lots and 10 outlots for construction of 55
townhouse units for Ridgewood West 6th Addition, based on revised plans
dated April 24, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report
dated April 24, 1987.
Motion carried--6-1-0 (Ruebling against)
Ruebling stated that he was not convinced that the property should not be
more appropriately developed as single family cluster lots, or some other
form of single family residential.
MAY 19,1987
34181 VOID OUT CHECK
34308 VOID OUT CHECK
34427 VOID OUT CHECK
f 1 53 VOID OUT CHECK
kt. 483 VOID OUT CHECK
34507 VOID OUT CHECK
34570 GOVT TRAINING SERVICE
34571 CRAGUNS CONFERENCE CENTER
34572 SOCIETY OF REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS
34573 ULI
34574 PITNEY BOWES
34575 VOID OUT CHECK
34576 VOID OUT CHECK
34577 OLYMPIC HILLS GOLF CLUB
34578 MN CALC
34579 MPLS STAR & TRIBUNE CO
34580 BSC MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS
34581 DUNLOP SPORTS CORP
34582 EUGENE A HICKOK & ASSOCIATES
34583 HOPKINS POSTMASTER
34584 JERROLD T MILLER
34585 VOID OUT CHECK
34586 LARS FRICKE
34587 BETH ANN CHRISTIANSON
34588 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
34589 MINNESOTA GAS CO
34590 BRIAN AMINDSON
34591 DAVID MILLER
92 BOYD PAULU
J93 DANA GIBBS
34594 HOPKINS POSTMASTER
34595 LMC HOUSING
34596 VOID OUT CHECK
34597 NORWEST BANK HOPKINS
34598 JAY JOHNSON
34599 KAREL ERICSON
34600 THOMAS MITZEL
34601 SETH MANLOVE
34602 MELISSA KRUSE
34603 TUMMY OSTLUND
34604 VIRGINIA CUBAN
34605 KEVIN THOMAS
34606 SETH MANLOVE
34607 KATHY BERG
34608 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
34609 VOID OUT CHECK
34610 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN MAY HEALTH INSURANCE
34611 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC MAY HEALTH INSURANCE
34612 GROUP HEALTH PLAN INC MAY HEALTH INSURANCE
34613 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP PAYROLL 5-1-87
34614 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 5-1-87
34615 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO MAY LIFE INSURANCE
34616 PERA MAY LIFE INSURANCE
?",17 COMMERCIAL LIFE INSURANCE MAY LIFE INSURANCE
k
-1D913377
239475.00-
12695.59-
1133.82-
361.96-
5717.50-
140.40-
125.00
213.63
43.00
155.00
11015.25
0.00
0.00
1989.25
95.00
140.40
1129.87
358.36
3834.67
450.38
17.00
0.00
9.00
17.00
256.84
1955.25
90.00
125.00
83.00
130.00
1075.43
194.70
0.00
800.00
27.00
38.50
38.50
11.50
4.00
11.00
12.00
2.00
40.00
14.00
41889.26
0.00
16806.21
8204.80
2262.65
850.00
4828.00
709.20
108.00
230.85
CONFERENCE-CITY MANAGER
CONFERENCE-CITY MANAGER
SUBSCRIPTION-ASSESSING DEPT
SUBSCRIPTION-ASSESSING DEPT
COPIER-COMMUNITY CENTER
AWARDS BANQUET-CITY HALL
ORDWAY MUSIC THEATRE TICKETS/FEES PD
SUBSCRIPTION-CITY HALL
-HEATER REPAIRS FOR SWIMMING POOL-
COMMUNITY CENTER
TENNIS RACQUETS & BALLS-COMMUNITY CENTER
MARCH 87 SERVICE-PURGATORY RECREATION AREA
POSTAGE-UTILITY BILLING
REFUND-FITNESS MEMBERSHIP
REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS
REFUND-FITNESS MEMBERSHIP
SERVICE
SERVICE
MILEAGE
MILEAGE
MILEAGE
PACKET DELIVERIES
POSTAGE-SUMMER BROCHURE
CONFERENCE-CITY COUNCIL
PAYROLL 5-1-87
REFUND-RUMMAGE SALE
REFUND-MEMBERSHIP
REFUND-MEMBERSHIP
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-FOR KIDS ONLY
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS.
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
PAYROLL 5-1-87
MAY 19,1987
34618 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG
34619 PERA
34620 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS
621 CITY-COUNTY CREDIT UNION (
322 HOPKINS POSTMASTER
34623 HOPKINS POSTMASTER
34624 HENN cry DIST COURT ADMIN
34625 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
34626 AMERICAN BAR ASSN
34627 RYAN HANSEN
34628 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS
34629 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS
34630 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO
34631 BRIDGETTE ROY
34632 JASON TORASSO
34633 MORGAN SLAUSON
34634 JOSHUA MOESCHL
34635 MINNESOTA UC FUND
34636 SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTER INC
34637 DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
34638 STATE TREASURER
34639 CITIZENS LEAGUE
34640 COLLEGE OF ST THOMAS
34641 GOVT TRAINING SERVICE
34642 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST
34643 BEER WHOLESALERS INC
34644 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO
34645 COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
34646 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO
47 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO
,..)48 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO
34649 MARK VII SALES
34650 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO
34651 ROYAL CROWN BEVERAGE CO
34652 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO
34653 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE CO
34654 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
34655 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC
34656 EAGLE WINE CO
34657 PRIOR WINE CO
34658 QUALITY WINE CO
34659 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
34660 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO
34661 PAUSTIS & SONS CO
34662 STATE TREASURER
34663 MINNESOTA REC & PARK ASSOC
34664 WCCO TELEVISION
34665 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS
34666 ENEBAK CONSTRUCTION
34667 KENKO INC
34668 NODLAND CONSTRUCTION CO
34669 NODLAND CONSTRUCTION
34670 J P NOR( INC
34671 J P NOREX INC
q4672 RICE LAKE CONTRACTING
Dt592610
MAY UNION DUES
PAYROLL 5-1-87
PAYROLL 5-1-87
PAYROLL 5-1-87
POSTAGE-SENIOR NEWSLETTER
ADDITIONAL POSTAGE-SUMMER BROCHURE
SERVICE
PAYROLL 5-1-87
BOOK-COMMUNITY SERVICES
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
MAY 87 RENT-LIQUOR STORE
LICENSE FEE-LIQUOR STORE
LICENSE FEE-WATER DEPT
BOOKLET-ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
CONFERENCE-BUILDING DEPT
CONFERENCE-BUILDING DEPT
CONFERENCE-CITY COUNCIL
BEER
BEER
MIX
BEER
BEER
BEER
BEER
MIX
MIX
BEER
MIX
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
LICENSE FEE-WATER DEPT
ADULT SOFTBALL TEAM REGISTRATIONS/FEES PD
VIDEO RENTAL-CITY HALL
SERVICE
SERVICE-TECHNOLOGY DRIVE
SERVICE-BLUFFS EAST 4TH ADDITION
SERVICE-HIDDEN GLEN 3RD ADDITION
SERVICE-WYNDHAM KNOLL
SERVICE-RIVERVIEW RD & RIVERVIEW DRIVE
SERVICE-BLUFFS WEST STORM SEWER
SERVICE-WATERMAIN/STORM SEWER
714.00
21750.66
168.88
1933.13
37.78
585.96
6100.00
10995.46
4.98
13.00
48.80
166.90
5427.08
16.00
16.00
16.00
14.00
2044.92
4360.91
25.25
15.00
8.00
175.00
50.00
310.00
4214.70
66.05
743.30
4026.55
11895.70
448.12
18568.42
489.15
265.60
17627.75
13.68
21164.43
17431.04
3906.56
4051.05
13082.39
36943.26
1625.29
987.44
15.00
3584.00
30.00
4789.34
2309.35
185714.65
10167.52
24051.15
44959.59
38557.76
49199.55
FA
MAY 19,1987
34673 SHAFER CONTRACTING INC
34674 SHAW LUNDQUIST ASSOC INC
34675 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER
(' '16 AB DICK COMPANY
.77 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC
34678 ADMIRAL WASTE MGMT INC
34679 ADVANCE UNITED EXPRESSWAYS INC
34680 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK
34681 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS
34682 AMERI STAR LIGHTING
34683 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC
34684 AMP PRODUCTS CORP
34685 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC
34686 ROBERT ARNDT
34687 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC
34688 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY
34689 AVR INC
34690 BALL HOPPER PRODUCTS
34691 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC
34692 ANNETTE BEACH
34693 BEACON PRODUCTS COMPANY
34694 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY
34695 BLACK & VEATCH
34696 BMS OFFICE STORES SALES INC
34697 BRADY OFFICEWARE
34698 LEE BRANDT
34699 ANDREA BROSCH
)0 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC
,.,01 BUSINESS FURNITURE INC
34702 CADY COMMUNICATIONS
34703 CARLSON & CARLSON ASSOC
34704 CARLSON REFRIGERATION CO INC
34705 CENTRAIRE INC
34706 CENTURION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC
34707 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS
34708 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO
34709 CHASE BRACKETT COMPANY
34710 CIMLINE INC
34711 CLEAN SWEEP INC
34712 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER
34713 JEFFREY CONRADI
34714 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC
34715 COPY EQUIPMENT INC
34716 CROWN/AUTO INC
34717 CURTIS INDUSTRIES
34718 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO INC
.(0-'19 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY
Y5893758
SERVICE-COUNTY RD 4 TO MITCHELL RD
SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDITION
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-PARK MAINTENANCE
PAPER-CITY HALL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MAY 87 TRASH DISPOSAL-PUBLIC SAFETY
DELIVERY CHARGES-PLANNING DEPT
BOND PAYMENTS
LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT
FOUNDATION LIGHTS-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
DECALS-WATER DEPT
EQUIPMENT REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
SIGNS-STREET DEPT & PARK DEPT
MARCH & APRIL 87 CUSTODIAL SERVICE
BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE
PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE
BLACKTOP-DRAINAGE
BALL HOPPERS-COMMUNITY CENTER
-BEARINGS/SEALS/SPARK PLUGS/DISTRIBUTOR
-CAP/BATTERIES/FUSES/HEADLIGHTS-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
MILEAGE
SOFTBALL FIELD MARKING-PARK MAINTENANCE
APRIL 87 SERVICE
SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION
PRINTWHEEL-POLICE DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES-ENGINEERING DEPT
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD
RACQUETBALL INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD
BLACKTOP-STREET DEPT & PARK DEPT
-7 TABLES $2068.00/3 DESKS $1416.50/5 FILE -CABINETS $1269.00/5 BOOKCASES $$1350.00/ -FURNITURE REPAIRS-FINANCE DEPT/COMMUNITY
SERVICES& PUBLIC SAFETY
PHONE SYSTEM-NEW CITY OFFICES
SERVICE-EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
SHELVES-LIQUOR STORE
FURNACE & AIR CONDITIONER-FIRE DEPT
SQUAD CAR SET UPS
RECOIL ROPE/FILTER-PARK DEPT
LEGAL ADS
SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW ROAD
HOSE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
HIKEWAY/BIKEWAY PATH SWEEPING-PARK DEPT
MIDLAND RADIO-PARK MAINTENANCE
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD
SEAL COATING-STREET MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT REPAIRS-ENGINEERING DEPT
-PAINT/DUST SEALS-PARK DEPT & EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
-GREASE FITTINGS/PIN CLEVIS/SCREB/DRILL
-BITS/CARBURATOR PARTS/CAPS/CLEANING
SUPPLIES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
1987 CUSHMAN CART-PARK MAINTENANCE
QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT
353257.49
255276.40
21.20
189.00
2828.00
51.75
85.34
69932.61
144.39
49.92
38.00
193.56
155.55
400.00
8282.23
30.70
178.65
135.46
514.97
14.75
252.00
585.75
9061.31
22.00
51.50
255.75
33.75
3745.15
6281.75
17302.95
970.00
1007.19
2645.00
425.35
9.91
145.08
600.00
251.18
4424.50
1006.34
231.00
1620.00
81.60
65.14
506.28
8810.00
6767.13
MAY 19,1987
34720
34721
34722
?,7 23
(3 24
4725
34726
34727
34728
DALCO
CRAIG W DAWSON
DECORATIVE DESIGNS
EUGENE DIETZ
DIXIE PETRO-CHEM INC
DORHOLT INC
DRISKILLS SUPER VALU
DRISKILLS SUPER VALU
DUSTCOATING INC
34729 EAGLE SNACKS INC
34730 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPT
34731 VOID OUT CHECK
34732 EDEN PRAIRIE TRASHTRONICS
34733 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC
34734 RON ESS
34735 FEED RITE CONTROLS INC
34744 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC
34745 GILBY SOAP & CHEMICAL CO
. 46 JEANETTE GILLIS
47 W W GOETSCH ASSOC INC
34748 GOODYEAR TRUCK TIRE CENTERS
34749 GROSS OFFICE SUPPLY
34750 MACH CO
34751 ROBERT HANNON
34752 HANSEN THoRP PELLINEN OLSON INC
34753 HENNEPIN CTY CHIEFS OF POLICE
34754 HENN CTY DEPT OF PROPERTY TAX
34755 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
34756 HENNEPIN COUNTY
34757 HENN COUNTY LIBRARY
34758 JACK HOENE
34759 HDFFERS INC
34760 MICHAEL J. HOSTETLER
34761 THE HOWE COMPANY
34762 IBM
34763 ICMA
34764 IDEAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
34765 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL 01ST #272
34766 INTL. ASSOC OF CHIEFS OF POLICE
34767 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC
34768 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC
„42862
CLEANING SUPPLIES-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
MILEAGE
MAY 87 PLANT LEASE & MAINTENANCE-CITY HALL
APRIL 87 EXPENSES
CHLORINE-WATER DEPT
FORMS-CITY HALL & WATER DEPT
EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
EXPENSES-CITY HALL
-OIL FOR DUST CONTROL-STREET MAINTENANCE &
PARK MAINTENANCE
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT
APRIL 87 TRASH DISPOSAL
SAFETY EQUIPMENT-WATER DEPT
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD
-SEAL RINGS/COUPLINGS/BUSHINGS/PRESSURE
GAUGE-WATER DEPT
TENNIS NET POST-PARK MAINTENANCE
SERVICE
2 EXERCISE BIKES-COMMUNITY CENTER
ENGINE TUNE UP-FIRE DEPT
AERIAL PHOTO SURVEYS-FORESTRY DEPT
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
MARCH 87 EXPENSES
-TOWELS & COVERALLS-WATER DEPT/PARK DEPT/
LIQUOR STORE
RADIO REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
CLEANING SUPPLIES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
KIDS KORNER INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD
DUPLEX SUMP PUMP-WATER DEPT
TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
INSTRUMENT REPAIRS-WATER DEPT
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD
-SERVICE-BLUFFS EAST 4TH ADDITION &
INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS WATERMAIN
SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT
POSTAGE-VOTER REGISTRATION VERIFICATIONS
SERVICE-PLANNING DEPT
MARCH 87 BOARD OF PRISONERS
REFUND-OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD
SOFTBALL FIELD MARKING-PARK MAINTENANCE
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD
FERTILIZER-PARK MAINTENANCE
JUNE 87 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
SUBSCRIPTION-CITY MANAGER
PUMP & STARTER REPAIRS-WATER DEPT
-ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ROOM RENTAL-
COMMUNITY CENTER
SUBSCRIPTION-POLICE DEPT
-APRIL 87 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-PUBLIC
SAFETY & CITY HALL
OFFICE SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT
195.80
19.00
151.50
165.00
646.95
1518.00
17.82
27.17
12606.00
21.12
420.00
0.00
395.00
1743.50
33.00
99.65
24.95
367.50
840.00
417.89
75.00
352.97
165.00
303.09
541.57
222.50
413.00
3771.00
563.88
189.12
221.58
165.00
10980.33
235.00
44.66
684.00
2845.62
1127.65
132.00
353.00
82.50
196.00
424.32
365.00
525.40
38.40
400.00
260.56
40.62
34736 FINLEY BROS ENTERPRISES
34737 FIRST TRUST
34738 FITNESS STORE
34739 FLEET MAINTENANCE INC
34740 FOREST SERVICE USDA
34741 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY
34742 JOHN FRANE
34743 G & K SERVICES
c
MAY 19,1987
34769 JORGENSENS CLOCK SHOP
34770 JUSTUS LUMBER CO
34771 KOKESH ATHLETIC SUPPLIES INC
( 72 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER
34773 ROBERT LAMBERT
34774 LANCE
34775 LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS CENTER
34776 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD
34777 LEEF BROS INC
34778 LEFEVERE LEFLER KENNEDY
34779 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC
34780 DAVID LINDAHL
34781 LCGIS
34782 MNGMT LEARNING LABORATORIES
34783 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERVICES
34784 MIKE MARUSHIN
34785 PAT MCCARTY
34786 TIM MCGOVERN
34787 MIXE MCPHILLIPS
34788 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO
34789 MERLINS HARDWARE HANK
34790 METRO PONE COMM INC
34791 METRO PRINTING INC
34792 METRO SYSTEMS FURNITURE
34793 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION
94 MIDWEST FENCE & MFG CO
,95 MIDWESTERN MECH
34796 HERMAN MILLER INC
34797 MARION MILLER
34798 MPLS STAR & TRIBUNE CO
34799 MINNESOTA COMMUNICATIONS CORP
34800 MINNESOTA COMMUNICATIONS CORP
34801 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
34802 MINNESOTA REC & PARK ASSOC
34803 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC
34804 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC
34805 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP
34806 MINNESOTA VALLEY LANDSCAPE INC
34807 MINNESOTA VALLEY WHOLESALE INC
34808 MINUTEMAN PRESS
34809 MODERN TIRE CO
34810 MODERN TIRE CO
34811 MOTOROLA INC
34812 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
34813 MY CHEESE SHOP
34814 NATL OFFICE INTERIORS INC
34815 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN
34816 NORTHWEST PRINTING
34817 NORWEST BANK MINNEAPOLIS NA
/''q18 OCHS BRICK & TILE CO
14083189
2 WALL CLOCKS-CITY HALL & COUNCIL CHAMBERS
LUMBER-PARK DEPT & STREET DEPT
-VOLLEYBALL/BASKETBALL & BROOMBALL
LETTERING-COMMUNITY CENTER
-TOGGLE BOLTS/BROOM/NUTS/CASTERS-WATER
DEPT & CITY HALL
APRIL 87 EXPENSES
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
PLANTS-FORESTRY DEPT
JANUARY 87 SERVICE-LANDFILL
UNIFORMS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
MARCH 87 LEGAL SERVICE
MARCH 87 LEGAL SERVICE
MILEAGE
MARCH 87 SERVICE
BOOKS-COMMUNITY SERVICES
TEMPORARY HELP-CITY HALL
-SCREWDRIVER SET/BLOW GUN/FRONT AXLE/NUT
-SOCKETS/RIVET GUN/PLIERS-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
MILEAGE & EXPENSES-WATER DEPT
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD
STREET SWEEPING-STREET MAINTENANCE
OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT
BATTERIES-STREET DEPT
MAY 87 PAGER SERVICE-SEWER DEPT
FORMS-POLICE DEPT & FINANCE DEPT
DESK & CREDENZA-DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
JUNE 87 SEWER SERVICE
LATH SNOW FENCE-PARK MAINTENANCE
REFUND-PLUMBING PERMIT
MODULAR PARTITIONS-CITY HALL
KIDS KORNER INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD
AD FOR SWEEPER BIDS-PARK MAINTENANCE
MAY 87 PAGER SERVICE-WATER DEPT
-MAY 87 PAGER SERVICE-POLICE DEPT & FIRE
DEPT
UNIFORM-FIRE DEPT
MEMBERSHIP DUES & LABELS-COMMUNITY CENTER
EMPLOYMENT ADS-CITY HALL
ADS-LIQUOR STORE
APRIL 87 SERVICE
MACHINERY RENTAL-FORESTRY DEPT
TREES-FORESTRY DEPT
PRINTING-BUILDING DEPT
WHEEL ALIGNMENT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
RADIO REPAIRS-FIRE DEPT
0-RINGS-PARK MAINTENANCE
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT & POLICE DEPT
3 MIRABOARDS-CITY HALL
EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER
FORMS-ENGINEERING DEPT
BOND PAYMENT
CEMENT-DRAINAGE
139.71
494.72
213.28
26.24
174.20
61.07
38.00
242.00
52.50
477.00
7120.11
2.00
4553.89
55.90
148.80
193.45
68.89
12.00
7050.00
54.00
19.36
10.50
468.00
921.84
89800.90
352.50
86.50
1672.72
329.00
56.60
51.50
103.22
172.00
131.68
122.85
75.66
37.75
250.00
36.50
2461.10
19.95
98.62
106.00
2.98
50.97
375.87
418.84
73.79
21280.93
66.00
COMPUTER DUST COVER-PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 37.42 GRAVEL-STREET MAINTENANCE 433.50
TRUCK SEATS CLEANED-PARK DEPT 248.00
MILEAGE 8.13 CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 265.50
PAVER RENTAL-STREET MAINTENANCE 637.50 MAY 87 JANITORIAL SERVICE 1341.00
-BASKETBALL/TENNIS & VOLLEYBALL TROPHIES- 391.00
COMMUNITY CENTER
WIRING FOR BALL THROWING MACHINE-PARK DEPT 485.00
-CORKS/BUCKETS/LABEL MAKER/TAPE/BATTERIES/ 780.44
COPPER TUBING-SEWER DEPT
-BROOM/REDUCERS/RUBBER STRAPS/SAW BLADES/ 183.33
-WALL ANCHORS/HINGES/PLEOCI GLASS/UTILITY
-HOOKS/O-RINGS/SPRAYER/CHAIN/DRILL BITS/
-BOLTS/NUTS/WASHERS/SPRAY PAINT/SCRAPERS-
STREET DEPT
VELCRO/STATIC GUARD/KEYS/BULBS-CITY HALL 43.49
-HOOKS/RUSTOLEUM/STRAPS/BLEACH/KEYS/PAINT 93.15
-BRUSHES/TAPE/UPHOLSTERY CLEANER/SPONGES/
RUG CLEANER/BLADES/WIRE GAUGE-WATER DEPT
-MOUNTING TAPE/SCOTCH GUARD/HINGES/CABLE 228.88
-CLAMPS/CHAIN/CHAIN HOOKS/DOOR STOP/KEY
-RINGS/MARKERS/PINS/NUTS/PAINT/ROPE/OUTLET
-ADAPTOR/PADLOCKS/SPRAY PAINT/SCREWS/PAINT
-THINNER/SANDPAPER/BRACKETS/BATTERIES/STUD
FINDER/OUTLET COVERS-PARK DEPT
-PRIMER/PAINT BRUSHES/RUSTOLEUM/PAINT 239.96
-ROLLERS/THERMOMETER/TAPE/SILICONE SEAL/
-SCOUR PADS/MOP HANDLE/VARNISH/GLOVES/
-MOUSE TRAPS/UTILITY GLASSES/SANDPAPER/
-CONTACT CEMENT/BOLTS/NUTS/WASHERS/TWINE/
BATTERIES/PAINT/STENCILS-COMMUNITY CENTER
-PRINTING-COMMUNITY CENTER & COMMUNITY 216.52 SERVICES
SAND-STREET DEPT & PARK DEPT 110.22 MILEAGE 10.50 SUBSCRIPTION-ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER 35.00 -SERVICE-BLOSSUM ROADWAY/BENNETT PLACE/ 16215.59 -HIDDEN GLEN 3RD ADDITION/RIVER VIEW ROAD/
WYNDHAM KNOLL/TECHNOLOGY DRIVE
-MACHINERY REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & 1499.62
PARK MAINTENANCE
DOG FOOD-CANINE UNIT 80.29 ALTERNATOR/STARTERS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 221.75 EXPENSES-STREET DEPT 17.49 REFUND-BUILDING PERMIT 1180.00 -2 REFRIGERATORS-$969.98/MICROWAVE OVEN- 1435.91 $249.99/HUMIDFIER-$149.99-CITY HALL
-MARCH 87 SERVICE-CITY HALL & NEW FIRE 5117.40 STATION
CAR PARTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 68.44 REFUND-OVERPAYMENT ON BUILDING PERMIT 10.17 FACE SHIELDS-STREET DEPT 12.00 -UNLEADED FUEL/V-BELTS/HAND CLEANER/FUEL 2943.82 -PUMP/SPARK PLUGS/LOCKS/MAGNET/PARTS-PARK
MAY 19,1987
34819 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC
34820 BILL OLSON
34821 PARK AUTO UPHOLSTERY
122 CATHY PERIA
23 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO
34824 PLEHAL BLACKTOPPING
34825 PMS SERVICE CORP
34826 POMMER MFG CO INC
34827 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC
34828 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
34829 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
34830 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
34831 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
34832 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
34833 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
34834 PRINT SHACK
34835 PRIOR LAKE AGGRETATE INC
34836 JOYCE PROVO
34837 RESOURCE RECYCLING
34838 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC
34839 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CO
34840 ROBBINSDALE FARM SUPPLY INC
34841 ROGERS SERVICE CO
34842 DALE SCHMIDT
34843 ARVID SCHWARTZ
34844 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO
34845 SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM INC
34846 SHAKOPEE FORD INC
34847 SHEEHY CONSTRUCTION
34848 SHUR TOOL SUPPLY
rq49 W GORDON SMITH CO
3459102
34850 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP -SCREWDRIVER SET/SOCKET SET-EQUIPMENT 87.25
MAINTENANCE
34851 SOUTHWEST AUTO SUPPLY INC -NUTS/U-BOLTS/SHAKLE PINS/CONNECTORS/ 2764.52
-SHOCKS/SPRINGS/CAR MATS/HITCH/LIGHTS/
-FILTERS/IGNITIONS/VALVE CORES/DEGREASER/
-UNDERCOATING/ADHESIVE/CARBURATOR/CLAMPS/
-BEARINGS/HARNESS KIT/FUEL PUMP/HYDRAULIC
-DISC/BRAKE SHOES/U-JOINTS/BATTERIES/RIVET
-GUN/CARBURATOR KIT/GASKETS/CRACKED BLOCK
-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/WATER DEPT
PARK DEPT/POLICE DEPT
34852 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC -EMPLOYMENT ADS-BUILDING DEPT & PLANNING 125.95
COMMISSION
34853 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC ADS-LIQUOR STORE 430.77
34854 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC FEBRUARY/MARCH & APRIL 87 LEGAL ADS
549 34855 SPS COMPANIES PLUMBING SUPPLIES-PARK DEPT 128.8A
34856 STEPP MFG CO INC PUMP REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 457.30
34857 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ GUN & AMMUNITION-POLICE DEPT
379 34858 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET ASH TRAY FOR SENIOR VAN 416
270:: 34859 SUPPLEE ENTERPRISES INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
34860 SUPPLEE ENTERPRISES INC EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER
34861 TESSMAN SEED & CHEMICAL CO CHEMICALS-DRAINAGE CONTROL 192.00
34862 TOWN & COUNTRY DODGE TAIL LIGHT LENS-WATER DEPT 36.44
34863 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS PAINT-COMMUNITY CENTER
5 34864 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN-STREET MAINTENANCE 1 71 7.40
34865 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-FIRE DEPT 96.75
34866 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICES UNIFORMS FOR CITY EMPLOYEES 1375.65
34867 UNIVERSITY OF MN STUDY OF ROUND LAKE-PARK MAINTENANCE
1:14:% 34868 VAN WATERS & RCGERS CHLORINE/FLUORIDE-WATER DEPT 1
34869 VANS PINES INC TREES-FORESTRY DEPT 127.05
( 70 VEIT CONST REFUND-BUILDING PERMIT
:_j71 VESSCO INC CHLORINATOR REPAIRS-WATER DEPT
34872 VOSS ELECTRIC CO LIGHT BULBS-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
34873 KEITH WALL MEETING EXPENSES
78.g00
8.00
34874 CHUCK WALLACE EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
PAPER-CITY HALL
41.50
34875 JIM WALTER PAPERS
34876 WILLIAM WARNER HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD
34877 WATER PRODUCTS CO 78 5/8 X 3/4 100 GAL MTRS $3579.42/DECALS/ 4:519;08080843
34878 WELSH COMPANIES ADDITIONAL BUILDING REPAIRS-CITY HALL
34879 SANDRA F WERTS MILEAGE & EXPENSES
5187.00
34880 WESTERN DESIGN & PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS-PUBLIC SAFETY 103.00
34881 WILSON TANNER GRAPHICS -SOFTBALL TROPHIES-COMMUNITY CENTER/ 881.00
-ADDRESS LABELS-CITY HALL/EMPLOYMENT
APPLICATIONS-HUMAN RESOURCES
34882 XEROX CORP APRIL 87 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
8 34883 YOUNGSTEDTS INC WHEEL ALIGNMENT-WATER DEPT 2 .9.0 0 00
34884 Z & S MANAGEMENT REFUND-OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL 1000.50
34885 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE -1ST AID SUPPLIES-PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING & 47.00
PARK MAINTENANCE
2746800
$1424049.44
290562.88
357.34
89539.49
74458.33
-757.83
303395.53
4539.17
21280.93
58738.86
687495.48
11743.75
-239107.50
3009.17
26873.54
91677.80
242.50
10 GENERAL
11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT
15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M
17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE
31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP
UTILITY BOND FUND
86 FIRE STATION CONSTRUCT
44 UTILITY DEBT FUND
45 UTILITY DEBT FD ARB
51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD
55 IMPROVEMENT DEBT FUND ARB
56 ROAD IMPROVEMENT DEBT FD
57 ROAD IMPROVEMENT CONST FD
73 WATER FUND
77 SEWER FUND
81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND
$1424049.44
INEG
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 87-119
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
CHAIN OF LAKES DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, Barr Engineering, in its capacity as engineer for Riley-Purgatory-
Bluff Creek Watershed District, has prepared plans and specifications for a
drainage improvement project commonly known as Chain of Lakes Drainage
Improvements;
WHEREAS, the Chain of Lakes Drainage Improvements will consist of storm sewer
connections from Round Lake to Mitchell Lake to Red Rock Lake to McCoy Lake and
ending at Staring Lake;
WHEREAS, the plans and specifications conform to the concept of providing
outlets for these landlocked drainage basins as established in "The Drainage
Plan" prepared for the City of Eden Prairie in Spetember, 1970 and subsequently
adopted by the Eden Prairie City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council:
That said plans and specifications are hereby approved and that the Riley-
Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District is hereby requested to proceed
with the development of a cooperative agreement to enumerate the
particular financial arrangements necessary to allow the project to be
constructed with all convenient speed.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 19, 1987.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Jean Johnson, Zoning Administrator
THROUGH:
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE:
April 28, 1987
RE: Naegele Outdoor Advertising Company's Request Dated February 2, 1987
BACKGROUND
Last fall, Nancy Jorgenson Fletcher and Michael Cronin of Naegele appeared
before the City Council. At the meeting they proposed removal of certain
billboards in the vicinity of the Minnesota River Valley and their
relocation along other roadways in Eden Prairie.
The City Council referred the request to City Staff for review and
recommendation. City Staff met with Naegele representatives on various
occasions and discussed the following: Naegele's proposal, the City's
Advertising Sign Code, existing billboards, possible new billboard zones,
scenic areas, etc.
Todate, Staff has compiled some introductory informatin on the issues. This
memo contains review of Naegele's request, existing billboard conditions and
agreements, and other items.
NAEGELE'S REQUEST
Attached is a draft dated February 2, 1987 submitted by Naegele's staff
outlining proposed Code language changes, additional advertising sign zones,
and a removal schedule for billboards #1-4 and 8-11.
The draft outlines new advertising sign zones along 1-494, T.H. #5, County
Road #18, County Road 62, and U.S. Highway 169-212. The zones are labeled
Zone One and Two. Zone One would be designated for the large painted
bulletins up to (672 sq. ft. size) upon properties zoned Commercial,
Industrial, or Office. Zone Two would permit poster panels (up to 300 sq.
ft. size) upon properties zoned Commercial or Industrial, or property at
Flying Cloud Airport which is zoned Public.
Staff has reviewed the areas proposed in Zone One and Two and recommended
deletion of scenic portions and areas not properly zoned. Attachment A
illustrates the new districts minus the scenic areas.
The Naegele draft proposes new advertising signs in these 2 zones as
replacement or relocation of some of the existing advertising signs.
The replacement ratios they have outlined are:
- removal of 3 signs for relocation of 2 signs, or
- removal of 2 signs for relocation of 1 sign
Also proposed in the draft are regulations differing from our present Code:
Code Regulation
Naegele Draft
2,000' spacing between signs
1,500' spacing
25' maximum height for signs
37.5' height for Zone One
30' height for Zone Two
EXISTING BILLBOARDS IN CITY
An inventory of advertising signs conducted in October, 1986, shows 19 signs
In the City. These 19 signs are depicted and described on Attachments B & C
respectively.
One sign is owned by the Eden Prairie Shopping Center, three are owned by
Schubert Advertising Company, and the remaining fifteen are owned by Naegele
Outdoor Advertising Company.
Not all of these billboards are in a City designated Advertising Sign Zone.
According to spacing regulations contained in the current Code, 2,000 feet,
a maximum of 9 billboards could be erected in the City's 2 designated
Advertising Sign Zones. A speculative illustration of these locations are
shown on Attachment D.
Agreements in existence regulating the removal of certain billboards are
summarized as follows:
Billboard #14
A 90 day permit for this billboard was granted on July 18, 1986, the
expiration date was October 18, 1986.
City Staff contacted Naegele regarding the scheduled removal of this
sign. Naegele's response was to wait and work out this permit
along with its other sign issues before the City.
Billboard #s 15, 16, and 17
The 1984 Agreement between Vantage Companies and the City, which was
also signed by Robert 0. Naegele, Sr. of Naegele Outdoor Advertising
Company, contains the condition that billboards along 1-494 are to
be removed when the 4th building permit in the development is
issued. City Staff contacted Naegele staff regarding adhering to
this condition in May of 1986. Naegele staff has chosen to wait the
Council's decision on their request for relocation of billboards and
new district designation.
Billboard #19
A resolution for the Eden Prairie Shopping Center off-site sign was
entered into in 1975, and had a yearly renewable condition. Now
with Prairie Center Drive and the 494 exit to U.S. #169 completed
and drivers better acquainted with the system, this sign could be
removed. The sign now contains inaccurate directions to the Eden
Prairie Center.
Other Conditions
Of the existing 19 billboards in the City, the State Department of
Transportation is involved in a condemnation case for the removal of
Billboards 1-13. If successful, this would remove the billboards in the
Minnesota River Valley, plus 2 billboards on U.S. #169 just north of
Anderson Lakes Parkway.
If the City agreements regulating removal of Billboards 14, 15, 16, 17 and
19 are adhered to, and the State Department of Transportation removes
Billboards 1-13, Billboard 18 would remain. Billboard 18 does not have a
State or City permit and unless it is demonstrated to be a legal non-
conforming billboard, it could be removed.
Besides City/Developer agreements outlining removal of certain billboards,
the City has removed specific portions of the existing advertising sign zone
in conjunction with development proposals. This was utilized in the Lion's
Tap development when the Advertising Sign Zone within 500 feet either side
of the property was removed.
A method utilized by cities to remove certain signs is the amortization of
signs. Amortization is the required removal of signs or billboards. A
trend in State courts is to uphold reasonable amortization plans and
periods. (For some additional information see attached.)
The information above sumnarizes a wide range of conditions which exist in
respect to billboards in Eden Prairie. It also briefly outlines regulatory
controls utilized by or available to the City.
SUMIARY
At this time given existing conditions, Staff does not believe a proposal
suggesting reduction of signs through relocation to new areas offers any
apparent advantage to the City.
In addition, the process of permitting signs in a condemnation case to be
relocated is not viewed as a solution but a process of opening up new
districts.
There are several approaches for treatment of outdoor advertising in Eden
Prairie, which may range from elimination of billboards to limited
districts. These all differ from the Naegele request. In order to
thoroughly investigate the pros and cons of the different approaches
available to the City, Staff will continue research if the Council so
directs.
EDEN PRAIRIE
FEBRUARY 2, 1987
I. Advertising Sign Replacement Zones
The following areas are hereby designa
t
e
d
A
d
v
e
r
t
i
s
i
n
g
S
i
g
n
Replacement Zones.
1. Advertising Sign Replacement Zone One
.
T
h
e
n
o
n
-
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
y
zoned parcels along both sides of Hig
h
w
a
y
1
-
4
9
4
a
n
d
a
l
o
n
g
b
o
t
h
sides of the limited access service pa
r
t
s
o
f
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
5
,
1
8
,
6
2
,
212 and 169, except for the following
a
r
e
a
s
o
f
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
s
c
e
n
i
c
quality. These reserved areas are loc
a
t
e
d
.
.
.
2. Advertising Sign Replacement Zone Two
.
T
h
e
p
a
r
c
e
l
s
z
o
n
e
d
f
o
r
commercial or industrial use along bot
h
s
i
d
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
p
a
r
t
s
o
f
Highways 5, 212 and 169 that are not
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
,
except for the following areas of si
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
s
c
e
n
i
c
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
.
These reserved areas are located . .
.
(See map)
II. Advertising Signs
New advertising signs are permitted o
n
l
y
a
s
t
h
e
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
r
relocation of an existing advertising
s
i
g
n
.
A
d
v
e
r
t
i
s
i
n
g
s
i
g
n
s
located within advertising sign repla
c
e
m
e
n
t
z
o
n
e
s
m
a
y
b
e
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
d
o
r
relocated in the same or another repl
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
z
o
n
e
.
A
d
v
e
r
t
i
s
i
n
g
s
i
g
n
s
not located in an advertising sign rep
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
z
o
n
e
m
a
y
o
n
l
y
b
e
relocated to conforming locations and
o
n
l
y
a
t
a
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
o
f
two new structures for each three exis
t
i
n
g
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
r
e
m
o
v
e
d
.
The Manager or designated staff memb
e
r
s
h
a
l
l
i
s
s
u
e
t
h
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
u
p
o
n
making the following findings:
A. Generally
2. Prior ,-dommencement of construction of the new advertising sign the previous sign or signs must be remo
v
e
d
.
3. The advertising sign conforms to al
l
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
f
o
r
t
h
a
t
advertising sign replacement zone.
4. The advertising sign permit fee has
b
e
e
n
p
a
i
d
.
5. The advertising sign will not be loc
a
t
e
d
c
l
o
s
e
r
t
h
a
n
I
.
-
3
0
0
feet to any other advertising sign
o
n
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
s
i
d
e
o
f
the same street or highway.
6. The advertising sign will not he loc
a
t
e
d
c
l
o
s
e
r
t
h
a
n
3
0
0
f
e
e
t
to any residential district located on the
s
a
m
e
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
same streei_ el' highway.
1. The advertising sign to be erected
i
s
a
p
r
o
p
e
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
or relocation of an existing advertis
i
n
g
s
i
g
n
o
r
s
i
g
n
s
.
A9
7;,"
7. The base of the advertising sign is not located within any
required yard in that zoning district or on the roof or
extending above the roof on any structure it is attached to.
8. The advertising sign does and will not display any flashing
lights or similar devices.
9. Any temporary extension of the sign will be an intergral part
of the message displayed on the basic sign face.
10. The advertising sign is structurally sound, is supported by a
single steel pylon, and is constructed of materials that
require little or no maintenance. V-type and back-to-back
sign structures are permitted. The "V" in a V-type sign
shall not exceed 30 degrees. Side-by-side structures or
faces are not permitted.
B. Advertising Sign Replacement Zone One.
1. Advertising signs shall be located in a Commercial,
Industrial or Office Zoning District.
2. The basic sign face shall not exceed 672 sq. ft. or be
greater than 371/2 feet above grade or the elevation of the
highway from which it is intended to be viewed, whichever is
greater.
C. Advertising Sign Replacement Zone Two
1. Advertising signs shall be located in Commercial or
Industrial zones or on the property of the Metropolitan
Airports Commission,
2. The advertising sign is located on a parcel with at least 200
feet of frontage on the street or highway.
3. The basic sign face shall not exceed 378 sq. ft. or be
greater than 30 feet above grade.
The determination of the City Manager or designated - representative may be
appealed by filing a notice of appeal with the City Clerk.
1 Proposed by Naegele
Zone 2 Proposed by Naegele
A
EXISTING ADVERTISING SIGNS IN EDEN PRAIRIE 1-19
us. ••• Designated Advertising Sign Areas according to City Code
B
Sign Located in an Property Owner Sign Owner Property Guide Plan Zoning Last Known Conforming or Non-Conforming to Present Code* Ad7—,tising Current Designation erinrnit Sign Area Use Naegele Naege le Naegele Range le Schubert Schubert Schubert Naegele Naegele Naegele Naegele Naegele Naegele Naegele Naegele Naegele Naege le Naegele Parr ill Peterson Darr ill Peterson Darr ill Peterson U.S. Fish /I Wildlife Darr ill Peterson Sever Peterson Sever Peterson Sever Peterson Sever Peterson Sever Peterson Charlson Cherne Cherne Vantage Vantage Vantage Vantage Bren Carpenter Agricultural Residential Rural 1968 Agricultural Residential Rural 1968 Agricultural Resident ial Rural 1970 Wildlife Open Space Flood 1970 Refuge Plain Agricultural Residential Rural ? Agricultural Open Space Rural ? Agricultural Open Space Rural 1970 Agricultural Open Space Rural 1970 Agricultural Open Space Rural ? Resident ial Open Space Rural 1970 Agricultural Residential Rural ? Agricultural Regional Rural 1970 Commerc i a 1 Agricultural Regional Rural 1970 Commerc i a I Open Regional C-Reg 1986 Conmerc I a I Open Reg-corn C-Reg 1970's Open Office Rural ?DN permit Open Office Rural ? Residential Resident ial Rural 1970 Open Open Space Early 70's NC: sb, 2,000 dist. NC: sb, 2,000 dist. NC: sb, 2,000 dist. NC: sb, 2.000 dist.. out of ASZ NC: sb, 2,000 dist. NC: sb, 2,000 dist., out of ASZ NC: sb, 2,000 dist., out of ASZ NC: sb, 2,000 dist., out of ASZ NC: out of ASZ, 2,000 dist. NC: sb, 2,000 dist., out of ASZ, 2 signs on 1 site NC: 2,000 disc. NC: sb. 2.000 dist., out of ASZ NC: sb, 2,000 dist•. out of ASZ It: 86' permit expired NC: Agmt. to remove not fullfilled, sb NC: Agmt. to remove not fullfilled, sb NC: Agmt. to remove not fullfilled, sb NC: Out of ASZ NC: Sign Purpose - direct traffic to E.P. Center, out of ASZ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No NC - Non-conforming sb - Does not meet setback requirement 2,000 District - Is closer than 2,000 to another sign Out of 452 - Not within the designated sign zone
z f
6 1
5 7
X Possible Billboards With 2,000 feet Spacing
A
A recent important case relating to the regulation of
outdoor advertising signs is that of Major Media of the
Southeast, Inc., d/b/a Naegele Outdoor Advertising Company
of Raleigh-Durham vs. City of Raleigh, 792 F.2d 1269 (4th
Cir. 1986). In Major Media, Naegele brought an action
against the City of Raleigh to have an ordinance relating
to the regulation of outdoor advertising signs declared
unconstitutional. The grounds asserted were that the
ordinance was invalid because it operated as a taking of
property, as an arbitrary and unreasonable exercise of the
City's police power, as an abridgement of Naegele and Naegele's
customers' First and Fourteenth Amendment rights,for being
vague and overbroad, and for denying Naegele due process of
the laws. The ordinance challenged was adopted in October
1983 and amended an earlier ordinance adopted in 1 0 7 1 . The
1983 ordinance severely restricted the size of off-remises
signs to 150 square feet facing 4 lane streets or 75 square
feet facing 2 lane streets and confined their location to
industrial zones. The 1983 ordinance also forbade the
replacement, renewal, or relocation of existing off-premises
signs made nonconforming by its terms. Existing nonconforming
signs were given a grace period but had to be removed within
5 1/2 years from the date of enactment, unless they fell
within certain exceptions as established by State law.
Existing on-premises signs were grandfathered in under the
1983 ordinance, but if their contents were changed, they had
to be brought into compliance with the provisions of the
ordinance relating to on-premisessigns--for example, size
requirements. On-premisessigns allowed are those which
direct attention to a business, profession, commodity, etc.,
sold on the premises where the sign is located. The ordinance
was interpreted as permitting non-commercial messages to be
placed on any sign. If a sign displays a non-commercial
message, it will be allowed irrespective of whether the sign
is located in an area where on-premisessigns are prohibited.
The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of
the City, upholding the ordinance, and Naegele appealed. The
Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision, and in
doing so, interpreted the United States Supreme Court's
decision in MetroMedia, Inc. vs. City of San Diego, 453 U.S .
490 (1981), to the effect that a City may justifiably prohibit
all off-premisessigns or billboards for aesthetic and safety
reaspnsso long as the prohibition does not show a preference
of commercial over non-commercial speech. The Court held that
since the Raleigh ordinance does not apply to non-commercial
speech, it does not violate First Amendment free speech rights.
The Court of Appeals also upheld the ordinance's 5 1/2
year amortization period. In coming to this conclusion, the
Court relied, at least in part, upon North Carolina law. On
the question of amortization, the Minnesota Supreme Court, in Naegele vs. City of Minnetonka, 162 N.W.2d 206
(
1
9
6
8
)
,
held that amortization of nonconforming signs i
s
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
but indicated that the period of amortization m
a
y
b
e
s
h
o
w
n
by the owner of the sign to be unreasonable, i.
e
.
,
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
value of the sign would not be exhausted at the
e
n
d
o
f
t
h
e
period.
Naegele sought to appeal the decision of the Cour
t
o
f
Appeals in Major Media to the United States Supr
e
m
e
C
o
u
r
t
,
which declined to consider the case, thus leavin
g
t
h
e
d
e
c
i
-
sion stand.
While several opinions were written in the MetroM
e
d
i
a
case which are somewhat confusing, the principle
s
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
in that case by the United States Supreme Court
a
p
p
e
a
r
t
o
b
e
:
1. Commercial speech may be banned from
off-premises signs for aesthetic and
traffic safety reasons.
2. Some types of non-commercial speech .
may not be banned, while allowing
other types of non-commercial speech
or while allowing on-premisescommer-
cial speech.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
May 14, 1987
Request Authorization to Hire Consultants for Park Planning,
Engineering and Surveying Assistance
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and Council have
received a copy of the update on proposed 1987 projects. At this time, the
City has one landscape architect that is responsible for not only drawing the
plans and writing the specifications, but also completing the field
supervision of these projects. The Homeward Hills project alone would take
one full-time person a minimum of 40 hours a week from now until the end of
the construction season to accomplish that project.
The Community Services Staff requests authorization to hire park planning and
engineering consultants to assist the City's Landscape Architect in completion
of these projects. City staff would recommend hiring several consultants on a
basis similar to how the Engineering Department uses consultants for road
projects. Staff would prefer to use local consultants as much as possible.
and would suggest firms such as RCM, Brauer and Associates, Hansen, Thorpe and
Pellinen, and perhaps Krueger and Associates. Staff requests the
authorization and the flexibility to use these various consultants when needed
on specific projects on a time and material basis, and would suggest a cap for
planning, engineering and inspections on any project not to exceed 1% of the
project cost.
The only way the Community Services Department will be able to complete even a
portion of the projects scheduled for 1987 is with assistance from these types
of consultants. All of these projects are funded from cash park fees, as
would be the consultant fees.
BL:md
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
May 13, 1987
Update on 1987 Community Services Projects
The purpose of this memo is to provide the Commission and Councilmembers a summary of
the park development and renovation projects that are either underway or planned for
completion in 1987.
EDENBROOK PARK
Installation of a playstructure, softball backstop, and an asphalt trail from the
sidewalk to the tennis court and playstructure; also construction of tennis courts and
the initial landscaping.
EDEN LAKE SCHOOL/PARK
Installation of $30,000 of playstructure (funded by the School District), grading and
seeding a soccer field with two small baseball fields overlayed (funded by the City).
This project requires approximately 6,000 yards of fill prior to completion.
EDEN VALLEY PARK
Installation of tennis courts, installation of trail, grub out woods and develop
picnic area, parking lot striping. Complete EAW for trail system and complete 1st
phase of trail.
EDENVALE PARK
Installation of two well houses/park shelters, grub out wooded area to develop picnic
area, expand playground area.
FOREST HILLS/SCHOOL PARK
Complete screening of expanded parking on berm adjacent to Holly Road; complete
finished grading and seeding of softball field that will be moved due to realignment
of Baker Road, install backstop, benches, etc.
HOMEWARD HILLS PARK
Complete survey and staking of southwest boundary, move the barn donated by the Brown
family to the site; install footings and renovate the barn for park purposes as
approved by City Council, complete the removal of the surcharge on the roadway,
finalize grading for roadway, placement of rock, etc; finalize grading for site around
building including skating area, hockey rink, tennis courts, volleyball courts, and
playground area; install tennis courts, hockey rink, skating rink, play equipment,
walkway and plaza.
HIDDEN GLEN PARK
Monitor the grading that is in progress with Dell Road, blu
e
t
o
p
a
n
d
f
i
n
i
s
h
g
r
a
d
e
,
s
e
e
d
by August 1st.
RED ROCK LAKE PARK
Complete revised plan according to the revised boundarie
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
b
y
M
a
s
o
n
H
o
m
e
s
.
RILEY LAKE PARK
Submit revised park plan to Parks, Recreation and Natural
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
Council for review and approval.
ROUND LAKE PARK
Tennis court resurfacing during first week in June, revie
w
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
d
a
t
a
o
n
a
l
l
signs regulating use of park; seal coat parking lot at Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
r
e
s
t
r
i
p
e
after seal coating; monitor City's interest in the school
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
o
n
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
n
g
ballfields; expand concrete decking around the park shelte
r
a
n
d
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
t
o
eliminate the mud and dirt areas that are caused by water
d
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
d
i
r
e
c
t
l
y
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
steep roofs and the high amount of traffic in those locati
o
n
s
;
e
x
t
e
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
t
o
provide drinking fountains at the kiosk adjacent to the be
a
c
h
,
t
o
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
p
a
v
i
l
i
o
n
and to the tennis courts; provide revised park plan for Ro
u
n
d
L
a
k
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
t
h
e
vicinity of the old library, the adjacent parking lot and t
h
e
h
o
r
s
e
s
h
o
e
c
o
u
r
t
s
.
STARING LAKE PARK
Provide an overall master plan for the park to be reviewed
b
y
t
h
e
P
a
r
k
s
,
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
and Natural Resources Commission and the Council incorporat
i
n
g
a
n
a
m
p
h
i
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
f
o
r
outdoor concerts in the park, trails, additional parking, a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
i
c
n
i
c
s
i
t
e
s
,
a
n
d
a future day camp area.
STERLING FIELDS
Resurface tennis court and replace backstop.
WILLOW PARK
Provide final grading plan and bid for finished grading t
o
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
August 1st, seed during the first week in August, install
p
l
a
y
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
i
n
t
h
e
f
a
l
l
o
f
1987, obtain soil borings for possible future tennis cour
t
a
t
t
h
a
t
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS
• EAW for the Edenvale Nature Trail
• Complete plans and specifications for trail resurfacing and
b
i
d
f
o
r
t
r
a
i
l
s
o
n
C
o
u
n
t
y
Road 1, County Road 4 and Homeward Hills Road
• Submit the revised Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Plan and
t
h
e
f
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
s
t
u
d
y
t
o
the property owners, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Res
o
u
r
c
e
s
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
,
t
h
e
City Council and the Watershed District Board
• CORE fishing pier grant application and followup
• Senior Center (old City Hall) Renovation - Fall of 1987 (CD
B
G
G
r
a
n
t
)
• Update the Comprenhensive Park Plan
. Complete the acquisition of the outlots adjacent to Purga
t
o
r
y
C
r
e
e
k
i
n
t
h
e
L
o
w
e
r
Purgatory Creek Valley
TRAIL PROJECTS
Obtain approval from Hennepin County for a solution to the problem at the intersection
of County Road 4 and Scenic Heights Road.
Complete the connection from Summit Drive across County Road 4 to the trail adjacent
to County Road 4.
Complete the trail connecting Yorkshire Lane to their mini park.
As staff is ready for bidding these various projects, the Parks, Recreation and
Natural Resources Commission and City Council can expect to review plans,
specifications and estimated costs prior to proceeding on any of these projects.
BL:md
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services14.---
May 13, 1987
Request Authorization to Proceed With Park Bond Referendum Voter
Survey
Earlier this year the City Council authorized staff to pursue the cost of a
survey of all individuals that voted on the 7.9 million dollar park bond
referendum held in March of 1987.
The Community Services Staff would propose to send out a questionnaire to all
2,510 individuals that voted on the referendum. The one page survey would
include a self addressed, stamped envelope to promote a high number of
returns.
Staff have contacted a research specialist with Carmichael-Lynch to assist the
staff in developing an unbiased instrument that would provide the City with
the information being sought. The major purpose of the survey would be to
determine the primary factors influencing how individuals voted on the
referendum. We would hope to determine if there was any specific items that
were either included or not included in the referendum that influenced how a
significant number of individuals may have voted on this referendum.
The estimated cost for this survey is from $1800 to $2000 and is broken down
as follows:
1. Consultant services $250
2. Postage 1,000
3. Envelopes 150
4. Printing (copy machine) and paper 35
5. Staff Time (estimated) 50-60 hours of clerical 375-570
at $7.50-$9.50/hour
The Community Services Staff requests authorization to proceed with this
survey.
BL:md
Mayor and City Council
Human Rights & Services Commission
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources ComMiss
I
t
o
n
Sandra F. Werts, Recreation Superviso
May 4, 1987
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT: Adaptive Recreation Proposal for Eden Prairie
Earlier this year, I was contacted by a pare
n
t
o
f
a
m
e
n
t
a
l
l
y
h
a
n
d
i
c
a
p
p
e
d
c
h
i
l
d
,
w
h
o
was interested in recreational services for
h
e
r
c
h
i
l
d
.
S
h
e
i
n
q
u
i
r
e
d
w
h
y
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
did not participate with the cities of Bloom
i
n
g
t
o
n
a
n
d
R
i
c
h
f
i
e
l
d
w
h
o
j
o
i
n
t
l
y
o
f
f
e
r
adaptive programs. Most of the children in E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
,
w
h
o
n
e
e
d
a
h
a
l
f
d
a
y
o
r
m
o
r
e
of special education, attend the District 27
8
P
o
r
t
l
a
n
d
S
c
h
o
o
l
i
n
B
l
o
o
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
a
l
o
n
g
with students fron Edina, Richfield and Blo
o
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
.
P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
t
i
n
g
i
n
a
j
o
i
n
t
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
allows the children to be with their peer gr
o
u
p
s
.
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
,
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
does not offer any specific programs for han
d
i
c
a
p
p
e
d
y
o
u
t
h
.
T
h
o
s
e
t
h
a
t
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
use the Bloomington/Richfield adaptive recrea
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
,
b
u
t
m
u
s
t
p
a
y
a
n
o
n
-
resident fee.
made some inquiries and found that Edina is
l
o
o
k
i
n
g
a
t
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
f
o
r
h
a
n
d
i
c
a
p
p
e
d
youth, but felt that they could not offer su
c
h
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
o
n
t
h
e
i
r
o
w
n
.
In January, Community Services Staff began me
e
t
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
s
t
a
f
f
f
r
o
m
B
l
o
o
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
,
Richfield and Edina to discuss how to bette
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
t
h
e
h
a
n
d
i
c
a
p
p
e
d
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
-
primarily youth in Edina and Eden Prairie.
The Bloomington/Richfield Adaptive Recreati
o
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
i
n
e
x
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
f
o
r
a
b
o
u
t
10 years. Because of the variables in deali
n
g
w
i
t
h
e
a
c
h
p
e
r
s
o
n
'
s
d
i
s
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
,
t
h
e
s
e
communites found it difficult to offer prog
a
m
s
o
n
t
h
e
i
r
o
w
n
.
T
h
r
o
u
g
h
c
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
t
h
e
y
found they could expand their services throu
g
h
o
f
f
e
r
i
n
g
m
o
r
e
o
f
a
v
a
r
i
e
t
y
o
f
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
to a larger portion of the population served.
Staff from Edina and Eden Prairie felt that t
h
e
i
r
r
e
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
h
a
n
d
i
c
a
p
p
e
d
population would be better served by joining
t
o
g
e
t
h
e
r
w
i
t
h
R
i
c
h
f
i
e
l
d
a
n
d
B
l
o
o
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
to use resources already established. Lil Hi
p
p
,
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
o
f
t
h
e
B
l
o
o
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
/
R
i
c
h
f
i
e
l
d
program, felt it would be necessary to hire
a
n
e
w
s
t
a
f
f
p
e
r
s
o
n
w
h
o
w
o
u
l
d
s
p
l
i
t
t
i
m
e
between the two communtities. Initially a lo
t
o
f
t
i
m
e
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
s
p
e
n
t
o
n
o
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
i
n
order to determine the levels of service ne
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
.
Programs would be developed for Eden Prairi
e
a
n
d
E
d
i
n
a
a
n
d
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
rotated among communities so that people wo
u
l
d
n
'
t
a
l
w
a
y
s
h
a
v
e
t
o
g
o
t
o
B
l
o
o
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
t
o
take part in a floor hockey program, for exa
m
p
l
e
.
A goal of any adaptive recreation program w
o
u
l
d
b
e
m
a
i
n
s
t
r
e
a
m
i
n
g
a
s
m
a
n
y
p
e
o
p
l
e
a
s
possible into ongoing community programs. T
h
i
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
d
o
n
e
t
h
r
u
v
o
l
u
n
t
e
e
r
s
,
interpreters or the use of adaptive aids or
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
.
T
y
i
n
g
i
n
t
o
a
n
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
program would provide more resources for rec
r
u
i
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
v
o
l
u
n
t
e
r
s
a
n
d
purchasing aids and equipment that would help
i
n
t
h
e
m
a
i
n
s
t
r
e
a
m
i
n
g
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
At the same time, staff from the four Commun
i
t
y
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
i
n
t
h
e
S
o
u
t
h
Hennepin Area were meeting to discuss the fu
t
u
r
e
o
f
t
h
e
L
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
E
x
c
h
a
n
g
e
(
s
e
e
e
x
h
i
b
i
t
I). The Learning Exchange was started in Blo
o
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
i
n
1
9
8
0
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Eden Prairie, Edina and Richfield Community Education Departments joined with
Bloomington in applying for a grant from the State Department of Education to expand
services in all four cities.
In January, 1987 each of the four Community Education Departments established a
citizens committee to: identify the target audience and number of eligible clients;
to identify the resources available to serve the target audiences and to submit a
recommendation to meet the gaps and voids in services to the four community steering
committee. This committee is comprised of the four Community Education Directors,
plus some specialists from the community. Natalie Swaggert and I served on the Eden
Prairie community subcommittee.
The Learning Exchange subcommittee in each community decided to look at services to
the total handicapped population in their communities. Each subcommittee developed
five voids and a recommendation on how to meet those voids within their community (see
Exhibit 2).
Staff from the cities of Edina and Eden Prairie were invited to join the Learning
Exchange Steering Committee. Recreation Staff and Community Education Staff discussed
the possibility/probabilty of joining together as a body of eight agencies to serve
the special populations of the South Hennepin Area. The concensus was that should be
a long term goal.
Since there are so many variables to be worked out, it made more sense for the cities
of Edina and Eden Prairie to join together with Bloomington and Richfield to serve the
youth population and the four Community Education Departments to continue serving
adults through the Learning Exchange.
Staff from Eden Prairie and Edina met April 23rd and agreed to pursue a cooperative
agreement to join with Richfield and Bloomington to offer adaptive recreation
programs. A tentative budget of what it would cost to add another staff person to
the Bloomington/Richfield program was developed (Exhibit 3). It is proposed that
these costs would be split between Eden Prairie and Edina.
The Community Services Department Staff is asking the City Council, the Human Rights
and Services Commission and the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission to
support the plan in concept, so that staff can continue to develop the plan and scope
of services. Staff would like to submit the plan and budget to the City Council as
part of the budget process. Implementation would begin in January 1988.
The four city staff representatives and community education respresentatives plan to
continue meeting in order to develop more cooperative progamming and to look at the
long range goal of joining as one adaptive programming body.
Attachments:
Exhibit 1: Learning Exchange Brochure
Exhibit 2: Recommendation for Handicapped Services from Eden Prairie Learning Exchange
Subcomittee
Exhibit 3: Proposed Budget for Edina/Eden Prairie to Join Bloomington/Richfield
Adaptive Program
Exhibit 4: Handicapped Statistics Eden Prairie, and Edina.
Exhibit 5: Bloomington/Richfield Adaptive Program Brochure
Exhibit 6: Cooperative Programming - Bloomington/Richfield
SFW:md
Community Education Services for Persons with Disabilities Blat rat Co iffp. I;F if! Co 5 . For More Information To loam more about •Specialized Of adaptive Programs • Support services such as Interpreters, tutors. transportation, etc. • Participation on the Advisory Committee • Opportunities for Volunteer service • Classroom and building accessibility • Other Learning Exchange and Community Education programs and services Call: Greg Jones Learning Exchange Coordinator 887-9228 (voice) 887-9144 (TOM Or Write: LE The Learning Exchange Bloomington EduCation Center 8900 Portland Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55420 BLOOMINGTON COMMUNITY EDUCATION & SERVICES Robert F. Vinetieri, Director Leila R. Anderson, Superintendent Independent School District No. 271 Art wore from Na. Life in the Neighborhood by Robert and Martha Penh. Abingdom Press. Copyright 1880. Used by permission. to E The Learning Exchange <tan. [Una.
The Need Over 30.000 people with disabilities live in the South Hennepin cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina and Richfield. Their disabilities take different forms: many have PhYSical limitations; some are developmentally delayed; others are learning disabled; some have hearing or visual impairments. More importantly, they each have unique and special ABILITIES that they can contribute to the life and well-being of their communities. Traditionally, numerous social and environment., barriers have kept disabled citizens from full Participation in Community Education programs. Whether lack of information, economic limitations. transportation needs, inaccessible classrooms or lack St spaniel services such as instructional aides or sign language interpreters, these barriers have made it difficult for persons with disabilities to learn new skills or share their special skills through Community EducatiOn. 'Source: MN-CIVR and U.S. Census data The Resource As a response to this need, in 1980 Bloomington Community Education began a program called the LEARNING EXCHANGE. Funded in part by the Minnesota Council on Quality Education and in cooperation with other community service agencies, the Learning Exchange facilitates the involvement of persons with disabilities in the Community Education programs of the South Hennepin area. AS a Community Education service, the Learning Exchange is committed to the concept of life-long learning and to the fullest possible Integration of all persons within the community. The Goal The integration of persons with disabilities within Community Education—and within the community at large—benefits each of us. All citizens, including those With disabilities, have a right to educational services which further their independence and enable their fuller participation in society. Likewise, every person has unique ABILITIES to offer, enhancing community life and well-being. The Learning Exchange and Bloomington Community Education are Committed to the fullest possible involvement of all persons; every reasonable effort will be made to enable full participation in all programs and services. The Services Programs and services provided by the Learning Exchange include: • Environmental accessibility, including the relocation of classes to barrier-free sites when necesserY, to enable the full participation of those with limited mobility. • Specialized classes and information seminars for adults with physical disabilities. • Sign language interpreters and note-takers for hearing impaired adults. • Volunteer instructor aides or tutors for those needing special learning support. • Adaptive Community Education programs. in the areas of independent living, leisure and social skills for persons who are mentally handicapped or learning disabled. • Adaptive Aquatics water safety end swimming program, in cooperation with Bloomington-Richfield Adaptive Recreation and the South Hennepin Branch-Amercan Red Cross. • After-care educational. information and referral services for persons involved M mental health or chemical dependency treatment programs. • Adult Basic Education and CEO preparation in cooperation with South Hennepin Adult Programs in Education 'SHAPE), for persons desiring to further or complete their basic education. • Referral to area transportation services for persons with disabilities. • Networking with local social service and community agencies in the Planning and coordination of South Hennepin area programs for disabled citizens. • Accessibility in program development through the involvement of disabled adults, advocates/parents end human service professionals in en advisory committee which helps plan all Learning Exchange programs.
Exhibit 2
EDEN PRAIRIE TOP FIVE PRIORITIES
VOIDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
LialleMatiallItaltafar-CiaLaili=b.
VOID: There is no central resource of information for referral.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
- Develop a data base of resources and a system to be centralized by city and coordinated
among cities whcih will be accurate, current, and operating In a proactive,
outreach approach.
VOID: People need to know about programs and services available.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
- News articles need to be in local newspapers on a regular basis.
- Newsletter to handicapped individuals needs to specify programs and
support services available.
- District and city brochures need to highlight that support services can
make most programs available to them.
- Send notices to churches for bulletins.
- Speak to local groups.
- Let care providers know more about what's available.
fjpArilialtha
VOID: Lack of coordination causes both gaps and duplication.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
- Need to share the planning and promotion and volunteer opportunities for Community
Education and recreational needs for au i four districts and cities This would cut down
on duplication,provide tor greater outreach to those in need, and maximize
transportation and othe resources through cluster programming.
- Develop an advisory committee of representatives from handicapped groups or
parents of special education kids to help plan programs with the professionals so that
individual suggestions get organized and considered. Develop a process of two-way
communication for closure.
Trraftpnrthirinn
VOID: There are limited services and people In need don't know about and/or use them often.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
- Have an informational session to explain transportation options such as Metro
Mobility, MTC, Southwest Area Transit, PROP, city vans, etc.
- Provide a chance to ride the bus routes, possibly free once..
- Promote transportation options and contact numbers through Senior Newsletter
- Promote through Learning Exchange Newsletter
- Promote through Special Education staff to parents of handicapped youngsters.
- Work to expand service for Metro Mobility which is not available after 6:00 p.m. and
for local bus service which stops at 8:18 p.m.
VOID: Need to offer more programs of interest to meet the needs of handicapped individuals
In a coordinated way to maximize transportation.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
- Offer programs seasonally like biking in spring and cross-country skiing In winter
- Plan courses on a year-round basis to include transportation with several activities
offered back-to-back such as swimming /crafts/cooking.
- Offer one activity that is segregated for a particular group followed by some
mainstreamed activity.
- Do more for Special Education kids and young adults beyond the school day because
they need to have fun in social contacts outside the Special Education framework.
- Continue to merge Special Education kids from Camp Edenwood into Eden
Prairie recreation programs and to have regular Eden Prairie kids attend
Camp Edenwood.
- Develop additional Community Education or recreational opportunities to meet the
needs for fitness programs in such areas as swimming, running, walking or easy
exercise. The proposed addition at the Coinmunity Center would have this.
- Offer classes like consumer math and refresher reading for LD adults who need
programs in the area of independent living skills or skill maintenance.
- Locate and start having literacy peoole use an inventory to check adults for
learning disabilities which need to be addressed when learning to read.
- Make sure that programs get rotated among four communities so all get access.
VOID: Need to identify special needs in advance so that kids or adults with handicaps can
participate in regular classes.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Parents should be asked to notify the office on registration form if
they have a handicapped child or someone with an allergy (possible wording:
For the well-being of your child, please indicate if they have any handicaps,
special needs or allergies: ) Or participants could be asked to
specify special needs ( i.e. interpreter, wheelchair assistance, etc.).
Llusumallairat
VOI DS: We need to have available trained volunteers and instructors, friendship programs,
scholarships, TTY phone numbers, Interpreters, notetakers, educational aids,
and other support services.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
- Develop the support services listed as voids.
- Publish their availability through community brochures and through client
newsletter.
- Provide training for instructors and recreational leaders and volunteers and aides
on a regular basis (quarterly?)
ler RI r
= ,
0 .....nnnnn••nn••••nn••• UTIONAL BEHAVIOR/AL DISORDER • USED HEAD/BRAIN INJURED RONICALLY MENTALLY ILL
n•n z
0
M VELOPMENTALLY DELAYED Mentally Retarded (epilepsy, cereprai EECH IMPAIRMENT :YSICALLY LIMITED . _ "
' m
\
t"
c
t
w
g
1 1 t
' , ..I. 2
" n .0 0 1,7
'.... i r; ,P,
. -2 .. LI'• a o n
at ....
, a I••• 3 al ... 1- •<
VI a 3 .a
1 o
r
;
•
211 III Respite Care for Caregiv
s 1113 3 a-a — leg Transportation
a Mil MR II. outreach
111 .. ilitirgli lam Scholarships
7"
2 r T.T.F./ T.D.D.
ma z int.rpreter.o..d..s unneammammvitaxms Seg regated Programs
RI ' 1111 g Emma Transition Programs . II REIN P.1 Integrated Programs
•
' icM •• 3 Volunteers to Assist
(in Pro.raml
Instructor Training z 1° Adapted Equipment
• ili iiiiii111)Williliti oh Accessible Facilities
11'I I IUU 41 ..,..-- Educational/Adapted Aids
lie Support Groups IIIIIIIIIII II:
13E1 aml
111111 lio
Friendship Program
Recreation/Leisure/
Social Services
Adult Enrichment
111111
1 1111.'
l
11111111111.1111.1111.111111111.1111111111111111=111111111
Ell
IIMIIMBIIIELIIOIIIIIIIIIIII 1111
\ \M
II
111111
Adult Academic
Counselingi
a) Career Counseling
b) Personal Counselin
IIlIlU Il lIlI 1 IRI IllIRU N a m
Personal Growth Programs
(self-esteem)
Independent Living Skill
Fitness
1111 X la Information & Referral
. II Coordination of Services -
•Ii
Exhibit 3
1988 EDINA/EDEN PRAIRIE ADAPTIVE BUDGET P
R
O
P
O
S
A
L
Edina/Eden Prairie Adaptive Programm
e
r
Community Center Manager(10%)
Senior Clerk Typist (5%)
Part Time Staff/Program Subsidies
Fringe Benefits (33%)
Time Cards
Office Supplies
Photo Copy
General Supplies/Staff Participation
Mileage
Postage
Printing
Office Rental
Transportation
Telephone (Phone Installation)
Conferences
Memberships
Office Furnishings (One-time charge)
$23,000
3,400
788
5,000
7,590
0
300
200
425
797
200
150
1,200
400
720/Yr
302
156
500
$45,128
Exhibt 4
STATISTICS
Boys and Girls ages 0-21
Hearing Impaired
Visually Impaired/Blind
Learning Disabled
Emotional/Behavior Disorder
Speech Impaired
Educable Mentally Handicapped
Severely Mentally Handicapped
Physically Handicapped
Autistic
TOTALS
EDINA
EDEN PRAIRIE
8
11
1
2
111
152
99
87
94
140
39
241/
19
22
15
10
1
0
387
448
Current Population Estimates
45,523 30,250
% Population
0.85% 1.48%
COOPERATIVE PROGRAMMING
Exhibit 6
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
'CITY OF RICHFIELD
ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAMS
FORMATION OF COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS
The concept of cooperative programming developed as Bloomington and Richfield
Park and Recreation Divisions realized that they were overlapping in some program
areas. After meeting and discussing our program goals and objectives we concluded
that both cities would greatly benefit by combining our resources and programming
on a cooperative level. We found that through cooperation we could expand our
services by offering more of a variety of programs to a greater scale of the pop-
ulation we are serving. That population being defined as those individuals who
happen to be physically disabled, hearing impaired, chronically mentally ill,
learning disabled or mentally handicapped.
Cooperative programming came into existence at a time when Bloomington and
Richfield were experiencing financial restrictions on their budgets. Special
programming is always up against the philosophy requiring a specific enrollment
in a program in order to make it self-supporting. When working with special
populations there is low incidence of an identified population in a given community.
Through cooperative programming, Bloomington and Richfield are able to meet those
goals. Another important aspect of this type of programming is being able to de-
sign programs to meet the specific needs of the participants for their ability
level. This prevents communities from placing individuals with extreme differ-
ences in the same program. If this happens the situation often causes the lower
level functioning individual to feel inadequate and unsuccessful, and the higher
level handicapped person to feel unmotivated.
Listed below are the guidelines which Bloomington and R
i
c
h
f
i
e
l
d
h
a
v
e
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
to facilitate cooperative programs.
I) Each city provides supplies, staffing and transpor
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
t
o
t
h
e
number of participants from their city involved in the
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
Examples:
Teen Council, Happenings, Mental Health and Drop-In Cen
t
e
r
.
2) Some programs counter-balance one another. Example: B
l
o
o
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
i
s
i
n
charge of planning and offering the Winter Playgroun
d
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
f
o
r
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
children, and Richfield is in charge of planning and
o
f
f
e
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
W
i
n
t
e
r
Events Program for teens. Both programs are offered
t
o
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
o
f
B
l
o
o
m
i
n
g
-
ton and Richfield.
3) Transportation
Transportation is provided by each city for its parti
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
.
Example:
Teen Council. Richfield provides transportation to an
d
f
r
o
m
R
i
c
h
f
i
e
l
d
f
o
r
those teens involved in the Teen Council program. Blo
o
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
a
n
d
R
i
c
h
f
i
e
l
d
provide transportation for the field trips. Transport
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
a
l
s
o
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
to non-residents once they are at the program site. (
f
i
e
l
d
t
r
i
p
s
)
4) Cooperation between two or more cities or aoencies.
a) Learning Exchange
Cooperative Planning Agreement
Cooperative planning among the Bloomington/Richfield
A
d
a
p
t
i
v
e
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
programs and the Learning Exchange came into existenc
e
t
o
a
v
o
i
d
d
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
of services. Through cooperative planning we are able
t
o
o
f
f
e
r
a
w
i
d
e
r
variety of programs to a greater scale of the populat
i
o
n
.
T
h
e
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
being served is defined as individuals with disabiliti
e
s
.
Purposes for cooperative planning:
I. To establish participant needs
2. To evaluate past programs
3. To establish upcoming program format
Guidelines for cooperative planning:
1. To meet during the pre-programming stage of
quarterly offerings to review program content.
2. The content of the Learning Exchange program will focus
on the promotion of education and/or independent living
skills.
3. The content of the Adaptive Recreation program will focus
on social/leisure activities, fitness classes and team
sports.
Exceptions to the above guidelines will occur whenever one particular
agency is better able to more efficiently or economically offer a
program. However, approval must be given by all 3 agencies.
b) Courage Center
Cooperative planning among the Bloomington/Richfield Adaptive Recreation
programs and Courage Center came into existence to fill a gap in services
in the South Hennepin Area. Through cooperative planning we are able to
offer some additional recreational opportunities to individuals in the
South area who are physically disabled.
Purposes for cooperative planning:
1) To provide programs in the South Area
2) To establish needs and evaluate programs
3) To pool resources, staff, expertise, facilities and equipment for
special events. Example: Tennis Tournament
Guidelines for cooperative planning
Programs will be run in one of the following ways:
1) Accessible space will be provided by Bloomington/Richfield Adaptive
Recreation for Courage Center to offer a program.
Example: Wednesday Wheelchair Basketball
2) Programs will be implemented by Bloomington/Richfield Adaptive Recreation.
Example: Wheelchair Tennis Lessons
3) Programs will be implemented cooperatively between agencies.
Example: Tennis Tournaments
5) Cooperation through Association
The cities of Bloomington and Richfield will advertise programs and activities
sponsored by neighboring communities or agencies. Example: Edina Special
Children's Group, Eden Prairie Park and Recreation, Bloomington Art Center,
Happy Hopers, Skippers and Spinners, etc.
6) Cooperation through Program Publicity
The cities of Bloomington and Richfield cooperate in the planning and layout
for the contrruction of one brochere to advertise adaptive recreation programs.
The brochure is printed seasonally (3 times) a year. Each city takes respon-
sibility for the brochure on alternating seasons. Each city prints and mails
out the brochure to their own residents.
Example: September - December (Fall Brochure) Richfield
January - March (Winter/Spring Brochure) Richfield
June - August (Summer Brochure) Bloomington
7) Non-Resident Fees
Non-resident fees are charged to any participant who is not a resident of
Bloomington or Richfield for each activity. Note: Residents are those indi-
viduals who live in the cities of Bloomington or Richfield. Non-residents
will be placed on a waiting list and accepted into a program after the posted
registration deAdline date.
8) Group Home Registration Policy
The policy states that only three residents from the same group home may
attend the same program. This policy was established to allow all residents
of our communities to have equal opportunity to participate in the activities we
offer, thus preventing any one residency to dominate our programs. Another
equally important reason is to allow residents of group homes to individually
select programs that are of interest to them and to provide an opportunity
to socially interact with peers with whom they don't normally get a chance
to associate with or share a common living arrangement.
--
If after the designated registration deadline of a
p
a
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
,
w
e
f
i
n
d
space available to accept more participants, we ca
n
a
l
l
o
w
m
o
r
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
i
n
t
o
that program. However, until that has been establi
s
h
e
d
,
w
e
a
r
e
u
n
a
b
l
e
t
o
accept more than three individuals in the same sess
i
o
n
.
Incase of limited registration for a particular pro
g
r
a
m
,
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
i
n
r
e
g
i
s
-
tration will go to residents.
NOTE: Residents are those individuals who live in t
h
e
c
i
t
i
e
s
o
f
B
l
o
o
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
and Richfield.
9
REFUND POLICY
For all cancellations there will be a service charge of SI
O
.
O
D
.
If the lee is lees than $10.00, service charge Will be total fe
e
.
In atleltion to the S10.00 service Chirp.. tefunStS will be
P
r
o
.
rates accor0 int to the Paned Of tirne gassed in the aCtI
v
i
t
v
.
NO refund, will be Issued liter 5.0$ the senor is commi
t
t
e
e
.
with the exception of a mainC11 excuse. tor which doctors verification will be reouirecl, upon which a refund willed issued for a portion of the total season minus the 610.00
service charge.
if an activity I. Canaille." Or Closed by the Park and Recreation Division. • full refund will De Isw.0.
10) Liability Statement
The Cain of Bloomington end Rich(ield, Park and Reeteetion Divi
s
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
a
l
l
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
u
a
l
p
a
r
t
i
e
s
c
o
n
n
e
e
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
a
b
o
v
e
a
s
s
u
m
e
n
o
n
t
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
d
i
t
y
for injury to participants.
11) Registration Forms
see attached forms
REGISTRATION INFORMATION
Additional blanks available through the Park
and Recreation office.
Enclose check or money order with this form
when mailing registration — Please send
separate checks for each program.
Checks payable to:
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
2215W. OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD
BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431
OR
CITY OF RICHFIELD
7000 NICOLLET AVENUE SOUTH
RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 55423
BLOOMINGTON
Recreation Supervisor of ADAPTIVE Programs
Debbie Backstrom — 887-9601 — TDD 8111-9677
RICHFIELD
Recreation Supervisor of ADAPTIVE Programs
Betty Gillespie Hansen — 861-4148
CHECK YOUR FORM. ARE YOU REGISTERED WITH THE APPROPRIATE PAR
K
A
N
D
R
E
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
?
A 41.00 non-resident fee will be charged to any participant who is not a resident of Bl
o
o
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
o
r
R
i
c
h
f
i
e
l
d
f
o
r
e
a
c
h
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
.
'The Cities of Moommgron and Meshed. Perk and Rocreenon Divisions and all contractual parries
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
w
I
t
h
t
h
e
e
c
t
w
i
t
i
e
s
a
b
o
v
e
a
s
s
u
m
e
n
o
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
lor injury to moments.
IPLERSE PRIA77
1
NAME
AGF Nati PHONE
ILAsn (FIRST/ ..1AO001.1)
ADDRESS CITY ZIP
NAME OF SCHOOL LAST ATTENDED
PARENT/GUARDIAN HOME PHONE . WORK PHONE
ACTIVITY
n CATION DATES DAYS TIME FE
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL (NAME)
PHONE WIRER 'NAN PA0E0T/W0001AM
ADDRESS RELATIONSHIP
OrSaalstlY
MY CHILD'S PICTURE / NAME / BOTH MAYBE USED FOR PUBLICITY PURPOSES —
0 YES 0 NO
(PLEASE PRINT)
NAME
AGE HOME PHONE won
VAST/ ..1A1100{1, .
CITY
ADDRESS
ZIP
NAME OF SCHOOL LAST ATTENDED
PARENT/GUARDIAN HOME PHONE. WORK PHONE
ACTIVITY -
LOCATION DATES DAYS TIM
FEE_
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL (NAME)
MTNER TOON PARENT/GUARDIAN
PHONE
DRESS RELATIONSHIP
DISMIILITY
MY CHILD'S PICTURE / NAME/BOTH MAY BE USED FOR PUBLICITY PURPOSES — 0
YES 0 NO
PLEASE NOTE: • You are registered for the program you've indicated on this registration form. Please ke
e
p
your check or money order for your receipt You will be contacted by phone if the proorrim is filler/ nr ronrallori
( au)
ItIAPPENINGS
BLOOMINGTON PARK AND RECREATION DIVISION
RICHFIELD PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
(To be filled out by participant)
NAME AGE_ BIRTH DATE..._
ADDRESS ZIP PHONE (H) -
PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT PHONE (W)
PARENT/GUARDIAN PHONE (H) (W)
ADDRESS ZIP
DO YOU WANT YOUR NAME ON A CLASS ROSTER TO BE SENT TO ALL PARTICIPANTS FOR
CAR POOLING PURPOSES?
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL (NAME) PHONE
(other than parent/guardian)
ADDRESS RELATIONSHIP
NAME OF FAMILY DOCTOR PHONE
LIST OF MEDICATIONS TAKEN DAILY
TIME MEDICATION IS TAKEN
POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS
ANY SPECIAL INFORMATION (Seizures, allergies, hyper activity, special diets, heart
trouble, diabetes, other restrictions)
PHYSICAL LIMITATIONS:
SWIMMING LEVEL: .
Uses life jacket
Adv. Beginner
Jr. life
Non Swimmer
Intermediate
Beginner
Swimmer
RECREATION SKILLS:
WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO GAIN FROM THE PROGRAM?
Please answer the following questions with YES or NO.
I am able to participate in Swimming Sessions?
My picture/name/both may be used for publicity purposes?
I am able to participate in scheduled field trips?
I understand the arrangements, and believe the necessary precautions and plans for the care and supervision
of the participant during the program will be taken. My signature below frees Bloomington and Richfield
Park and Recreation Division from any liability in case of accident.
MAIL TO:
Adaptive Recreation Program
Bloomington Park and Recreation Divioion
2215 West Old Shakopee Road
Bloomington, 1414 $5431 DATE PARTICIPANTS SIGNATURE
Please Register:
NAME AGE BIRTH DATE_
ZIP
(Sc)
ADDRESS
NAME OF PROGRAM
( RENT/GUARDIAN HOME PHONE
NNE OF SCHOlLATIBIaNG: WORK PHONE
DO YOU WANT YOUR NAME ON A CLASS ROSTER TO BE SENT TO ALL PARTICIPANTS FOR
CAR POOLING PURPOSES?
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL (NAME)
PHONE
(other than parent/guradian)
# ADDRESS
• TYPE OF HANDICAPPING CONDITION
RELATIONSHIP
NAME OF FAMILY DOCTOR
• LIST OF MEDICATIONS TAKEN DAILY
• TIME MEDICATION IS TAKEN
# POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS
PHONE
ANY SPECIAL INFORMATION (Seizures, allergies, hyperactivity, special diets,
hear trouble, diabetes, other restrictions)
(-If your child has seizures please complete the enclosed form)
' lt would you like your child to gain from the program?
Please list any behaviors you would like the staff to help your child improve
On:
Please answer the following questions with YES or NO.
My child may participate in Swimming Sessions
My child's piciure/name/botn may be used for pub ic:ily —purposes
My child is granted permission to participate in scheduled field trips
We understand the arrangements, and believe the necessary precautions and
plans for the care and supervision of the student during the program will
be taken. My signature below frees the Bloomington Park and Recreation
Division and the Richfield Department of Community Services from any liabilit
in case of accident.
PARENT/GUARDIANS SIGNATURE DATE
i Please include any additional comments or information regarding your child
!skills, gross motor activity, fine motor skills, endurance, communication, i
on the back(Include any physical limitations, swimming skills, recreation i
-,tional and social behavior, and personality characteristics)
Tdaptive Rei -reation Program 1 .L TO:
Richfield Community Center
7000 Nicollet Avenue South
Richfield, MN 55423
Jul
FOR THE STUDENT WITH EPILEPSY
NAME
BIRTHDATE
SEX
PARENTS
ADDRESS
HOME PHONE
PHYSICIAN
TYPE OF EPILEPSY
RECEIVING TREATMENT
TYPE OF MEDICATION
TIME MEDICATION IS TAKEN
POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS
LIKELIHOOD AND FREQUENCY OF SEIZURES DURING SCHOOL HOURS
ANY LIMITATIONS SPECIFIED BY PHYSICIAN
PARENTS COMENTS
YES
NO
DESIRED FIRST AID PROCEDURES
12) Program Evaluation
Each city writes an evaluation for each program it is responsible for facili-
tating. It is also the responsibility of each city to see that these evalua-
tions and complete program information is given to the cooperating cities or
agencies. Program Evaluations should include:
1. Basic Who What, When and Where information.
2. Instructor and/or Team-volunteers
3. Breakdown
a) Number of participants
b) Residency
c) Ratio of men to women
4. Cost of Program
a) Where registrations were taken
b) Who coordinated
5. Evaluation - Recommendations
6. Prepared by and date
7. Cooperative breakdown
NOTE: All pre-program planning is done in cooperation between the cities of
Bloomington and Richfield.
Purpose
The Bloomington/Richfield Adaptive Recreation Program strives to
offer a continuum of leisure opportunities for individuals who have
disabilities. A variety of community based programs are provided
as well as opportunities for integration into the general recreation
programs. Our programs become a stepping stone whereby individuals
learn of and become comfortable with leisure opportunities they will
later be able to pursue independently.