Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 04/21/1987 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 21, 1987 7:30 P.M., CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Community Services Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. MINUTES A. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 24 1987 Page 7B7 , B. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, April Zx 1987 Page 794 III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List Page 818 B. Resolution No. 87-100, Proclaiming the week of April 21 - 25 as Local Chamber of Commerce Week —` Page B19 C. AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 11L CITY CODE. 2nd Reading of Ordinance Page B20 No. 9-87 Amending City Code Chapter 11, Entitled Land Use Regulation (Zoning), and Readoption of City Code Chapter 11 in its Entirety as Amended Herein, 1) by Renumbering Several Paragraphs Under Definitions; 2) by Including Definition for a Maximum Base Area Ratio; 3) by Changing Special Requirements for Filing and Recording of Legal Descriptions and Zoning District Changes; 4) by Including a Column Designating Maximum Base Area Ratio; 5) by Amending Mechanical Equipment Screening Standards; 6) by Including Provisions for Required Landscaping in Residential Districts; 7) by Changing Provisions Relating to Off-street Parking Space Requirements for Office Use and Amending Exterior Material Design Standards to Omit Factory Fabricated and Finished Metal Framed Panel Construction; 10) by Adding Golf Courses as Permitted Uses in Rural Districts Exclusively; 11) by Providing for a Maximum Square Footage Requirement for Supporting Commercial Sales and Services to Office Users within Large Office Structures; 12) by Adding a Requirement Limiting the Square Footage Maximums for Neighborhood Commercial Services and Community Commercial Services; 13) by Providing City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,April 21, 1987 for a Maximum Percentage of Gross Building Area That Supporting Minor Commercial Uses Can Occupy in Industrial Districts; 14) by Adding a Requirement to Specify "End Land Use" After Land Alteration Occurs and Identify Zoning of Property After Land Alteration Occurs Under Section Entitled Mining Operation and Land Alteration Regulations; 15) by Providing for a Maximum Size of Name Plates as Permitted Under Home Occupation Code; 2 16) by Renumbering Several Paragraphs Under Subdivision 2, Entitled Sign Permits; 17) by Adding a Definition for Sign Base; 18) by Adding Area Identification Regulation Criteria Under Subdivision 3 Entitled General Provisions; 19) by Adding Sign Base Criteria Under Residential Districts; 21) by Amending That Portion of the Commercial Sign Ordinance by Consolidating Permitted Commercial Sign Criteria Under One Heading for All Commercial Districts; 22) by Deleting Paragraph D of Subdivision Four of Section Entitled Sign Permits; 23) by Amending That Portion of the Office Sign Ordinance by Including Provisions for Wall Signs for Each Elevation and Including Sign Base Criteria; 24) by Adding Sign Base Criteria to Industrial Districts; 25) by Adding Sign Base Criteria to Public Districts; 26) by Relettering Paragraphs under Section Entitled Sign Permits; 27) by Adopting Zoning Map Entitled "Zoning Map of the City of Eden Prairie," dated January, 1987; and 28) Readoption of City Code Chapter 11 in its Entirety as Amended Herein. O. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 13-B7, Repealing Section 2.12 Page 741 Entitled "Development Commission", of the City Code E. TOPVIEW ACRES 5TH ADDITION by Jerrold T. Miller and Cris R. Page 838 Miller. Approval of Amendment to Developer's Agreement for Topview Acres. 3.7 acres into six single family lots and one outlot. Location: Northwest quadrant of Gerard Drive and Beehive Court. F. PRAIRIE VIEW CENTER 2N0 ADDITION by Prairie View Associates. Page 841 Approval of Amendment to Developer's Agreement for Prairie View Center. 14.6 acres into two lots. Location: North of Plaza Drive, east of Prairie Center Drive. G. Change Order No. 2� Valley View Road Improvements, I.C. 51-272 Page 844 H. Preliminary and Final Plat Approval for Willow Creek 3rd Addition Page 846 for approximately eight acres; Approval of Amendment to Developer's Agreement for Willow Creek Farm. Location: (West of U.s. Hwy. 169 and south 7-Willow Creek Road) (Resolution No. 87-91 - Preliminary and Final Plat Approval) I. Final Plat Approval for Edenvale 21st Addition (SE Corner Page 849 of Woodland Drive and Edenvale Boulevard) Resolution No. 87-94 J. Final Plat Approval for Topview Acres 5th Addition (Beehive Page 852 Court) Resolution No. 87-96 K. Final Plat Approval for Meadow Park 3rd Addition (NW corner of Homeward Hills Road and Sunnybrook Road) Resolution No. Page B55 87-97 1 City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,April 21, 1987 L. Receive Southwest Suburban Cable Commission's (SWSCC) Page 858 Annual Report for 1986 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. BLOSSOM RIDGE ADDITION by G. W. Pearson. Request for Zoning Page 864 District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 1.7 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 3.1 acres into four single family lots and one outlot. Location: South of Blossom Road, east of Bennett Place. (Ordinance No. 15-87 - Rezoning; Resolution No. B7-86 - Preliminary Plat) B. CARDINAL CREEK RIDGE by Countryside Investments, Inc. Request Page 872 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential on 23.1 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept Review n 23.1 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review, with Zoning from Rural to R1-13.5 with variances on23.1 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 23.1 acres into 37 single family lots and road right-of-way. Location: East of Baker Road and Edenvale Boulevard inter- section, west of Interstate I-494. (Resolution No. 87-87 - Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; Resolution No. 87-88 - PUD Concept; Ordinance No. 16-87-PUD-3-87 - Rezoning and PUD District Review; Resolution No. 87-89 - Preliminary Plat C. Feasibility Study for Prairie View Drive/St. Andrew Drive page 884 Improvements, I.C. 52-104 Resolution No. 87-92 D. Feasibility Study for Bennett Place and Blossom Road page 885 Improvements, I.C. 52-105 (Resolution No. 87-93) V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Page 886 VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. CARDINAL HILLS by new American Homes Corporation. 2nd Reading page 896 of Ordinance No. 6-87, Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Cardinal Hills; and Adoption of Resolution No. 87-58, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 6-87 and Drdering Publication of Said Summary. 39.5 acres into 59 single family lots, three outlots, and road right-of-way. Location: North of Cardinal Creek Road, west of I-494 (Ordinance No. 6-87 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 87-58 - Authorizing Summary and Publication) B. 1st Reading of Drdinance No. 14-87, Regulating the Possession, Service and Consumption of Liquor, Beer Kegs, Beer and Wine in Page 905 Public Parks VII. PETITIONS REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Request from CSM (Fountain Head Apartments) for an extension to November I, 1987 to start development of ta to 495 Page 908 uniti-Mg-,-600,WT Resolution No. 87-90 B. Concept Plan Approval for T.H. 212 Corridor/Official Mapping Process ia: City Council Agenda - 4 - Tues.,April 21, 1987 VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS 41 IX. APPOINTMENTS A. Appointment of Steve Cwodzinski to the Bicentennial of the U.S. Constitution Committee X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members B. Report of City Manager 1. Restructuring of Benefit Program Page 909 2. Recommendation for Consultant on Human Services Model Page 909D C. Report of City Attorney D. Report of Director of Planning E. Report of Director of Community Services, 1. Re.uest Authorization for 1st Phase Development of Page 910 Willow Park 2. Award Bids for Bituminous Overlay on Tennis Courts at page gig Round Lake park F. Report of Director of Public Works 1. Award 1987 Seal Coat Project, I.C.. 52-113 (Resolution Page 916 No. B7-9B XI. NEW BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1987 3:00 PM, CITY HALL LUNCHROOM COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Jean Harris and 11 Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Councilmember Pidcock arrived at 3:15 PM. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 3:05 PM. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Agenda as published. Motion carried unanimously. III. DISCUSSION ON ROLE OF DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Peterson called attention to the memo of March 20th from City Manager Jullie with recommendations regarding the Develop- ment Commission. Bentley asked if we will be able to take action on this today. Peterson responded that we probably can take action on this as it has been fairly well publicized ahead of time, unless Councilmembers would want more time to review the materials. Bentley then noted that the memo is quite explicit. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt the following recommendations regarding the Development Commission: 1. Direct City Staff to prepare an amendment to the City Code which deletes the Development Commission; 2. Direct Staff to send a letter to Ms. Bolene, Mr. Thompson and Mr. Opheim explaining the Council's actions and expressing our appreciation for their service on the Development Commission; 3. Let the record show that it is the Council's intent to consider reactivating the Development Commission if in the future issues arise which would warrant such action. City Council Minutes -2- March 24, 1987 ( Harris asked what the traditional role of this commission has been and if it has ever played a major role in the City. City Manager Jullie said there are a number of different projects the Commission has worked on over the years, such as the Star City issue, review of a proposed policy with respect to sprinkling systems in office buildings, the Major Center Area tax increment financing program that was responsible for finally getting the Ring Road project underway, and studies on property taxes. Bentley noted that the Commission was in- volved in a housing study in 1981-1982. Anderson asked what is the difference between deleting the Commission or disbanding it. Jullie said he recommended deleting the Commission as a cleaner process, in order to avoid a confusing situation where the Commission is not de- leted yet no one is appointed to it. He said if it is reacti- vated, we would need to look at a whole new definition of what it does. Harris said she had always been concerned that the definition of the Commission did not coincide with the City's current needs. She asked what kinds of support had been given to getting citizen input into the City's planning for long-term growth. She said she thought the Planning Commission is doing a tremendous job in terms of the immediate needs, but she doesn't see a body that is giving advice for the long term. Peterson said that might be more appropriately called a long • - range planning commission, rather than a development commis- sion. Councilmember Pidcock arrived at 3:15 PM. City Manager Jullie said Ann Bolene of the Development Com- mission had suggested that if special projects come along, we select people who have expertise in that area to serve on a committee for that specific project. Peterson said that would be similar to an ad-hoc committee and would get commit- tee members who have the right expertise for the issue. Anderson said he definitely wanted to avoid the situation where we eliminate the Commission and then turn around and appoint another in a year to two. Peterson said the ordinance as it presently reads refers to broad-based economic develop- ment, and he was sure any future commission or task force would be narrow-based, with a single-function purpose. Bentley said at the time when the Development Commission was most recently put together, the Chamber of Commerce was just really getting on its legs and there was no organization in the City that could take input from business or deal with the %l7 City Council Minutes -3- March 24, 1987 issues of advocating development of the community. He said in 1978 it was a campaign issue that the role of the Develop- ment Commission was not strong enough. Since then the Chamber has become a much more viable and assertive entity and has assumed some of the roles that were originally envisioned for the Development Commission. Bentley said, however, that he thought it was important to not view the Chamber as an extension of the City,as that isn't their role. He felt, therefore, that it was important to not rule out the possibility of ever reactivating the Commission. Harris commented that she felt the letter of resignation from Don Opheim showed some discomfort in his resignation. Jullie said Mr. Opheim didn't choose to share anything with him be- fore that letter came along. He would suggest we contact Mr. Opheim for any further explanation desired. Peterson said he thought it was sufficient to say that it probably has nothing to do with the Development Commission, rather it is in response to other things. Pidcock noted that she had talked with Mr. Opheim about his letter of resignation. Peterson said he didn't think this needs to be part of a public discussion; however, other Councilmembers are also free to contact Mr. Opheim, Pidcock said she would like to bring this up at the next meeting for discussion and determination of policy. Harris said that the letter bears follow-up to determine the circumstances; but that this does not have a direct bearing on the issue on the table at the moment. VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously. IV. CITY MANAGER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM - GOALS Referring to his memo of March 20th and the attached list of goals, City Manager Jullie said he thinks each one of the goals is important and they all fit together. Peterson noted that No. 4 on the list, regarding an approp- riate recycling plan for the City, should be started very quickly. He said he would like to change the wording of that to "Determine and recommend an appropriate recycling plan for the City." Bentley asked how many specific goals we are looking at to be put on the performance review. Harris said, while there is no set number, she would suggest two or three that the Council would see as essential. She said it was important to look at something we could evaluate. iG`? City Council Minutes -4- March 24, 1987 Ir Bentley said there are some that are non-measurable goals. He said Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 appear to be good, measurable goals. He suggested that we could identify the basic goals, ask Mr. Jullie to refine the language so that they fit into the performance review, and then have him bring them back • for Council approval. Peterson said he had some reluctance to focus in on three or four goals and presuppose that they are quantifiable. He said he didn't believe that all the goals we have for the City Manager fit that narrow definition, yet are very impor- tant goals. He said that No. 10, regarding pursuing the City's best interests in the Flying Cloud Landfill expansion issue, is one of those that would be difficult to measure. Bentley said he had also checked Nos. 10, 11 and 16 as being good goals; however, he thought No. 10 has political over- tones that are not measurable and that could impact the scoring. Harris said in order to designate a goal such as No. 10, the specific steps that are in the best interests of the City would have to be defined since the City Manager has control over certain things and not over others. She said in this case we would have to have already defined what the City's posture is regarding the landfill expansion and then charge the City Manager with carrying out that policy. Peterson noted that we have defined at least two facets of a good goal -- that it is quantifiable and that it is some- thing over which the person has nearly absolute control. He asked if there are more items that should be included in the definition. Harris said it should benefit the City and help the City actualize its policies. Peterson said he was reluctant to say let's just have these four goals and minimize the importance of several of the other 14 on the list. Harris said it would not necessarily mini- mize the others, as some of those should be part of his posi- tion anyway and may be covered in another section of the performance evaluation. Anderson said he thought Nos. 12, 13 and 14 could be condensed into the area of communications. Bentley noted that those are already addressed in other parts of the assessment. Regarding Items 10 and 11 which appear to be similar in nature, Bentley asked what happens if we identify one of these goals and for some reason the landfill people withdraw their re- quest or the Federal Highway Funding bill does not get passed. f City Council Minutes -5- March 24, 1987 t He said he thought it was important to specify something that is within the control of the Manager to attain and that is not subject to a number of outside influences. Pidcock said this can be measured through his involvement with or support of the different groups that are pushing to get these items accomplished; for example, his support of the lobbying effort to get the road improvements. Bentley said he would suggest Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 as the four goals to be listed. Pidcock said she would like to see No. 11 (MnDOT follow-through on T.H. 5 and T.H. 169 improvements) included. Harris said that she would prefer to keep the number of goals at four. Bentley said he had suggested those four goals because the attainment of those goals can be measured and would also be a significant accomplishment from the City's perspective. Peterson asked if No. 3 (completion of the Comparable Worth Study) would involve a considerable amount of Mr. Jullie's time and talents. Jullie said he would not have to be in- volved intensely in the completion of the study. He noted that we have retained a consultant to help with that. Peter- son then said we might want to consider replacing No. 3 with either No. 11 or No, 9, as he thought No. 9 (MCA Tax Incre- ment Financing for road improvements) was also worthy of consideration. Harris said she thought No. 9 was a good suggestion. She said Mr. Jullie's involvement in No. 3 would be primarily in the area of implementation. She also said she felt that No. 11 is going to be very much a political and financing decision; therefore, she was not sure Mr. Jullie can ensure that McDOT can follow through. Anderson asked if the possibility of including some of the others should be considered, perhaps as subgoals. Peterson said he thought some of the specific things can be included, such as employee safety. An informal vote was taken on the goals suggested. The following four goals will be this year's stated goals for the City Manager: 1. Update the City's Capital Improvement Program. 2. Work with Director of Human Resources to bring to completion the Comparable Worth Study and implement compensation plan. 3. Determine and recommend an appropriate recycling plan for the City. Study and make recommendations on utilizing Reuter facility, curbside collection, organized collection, etc. City Council Minutes -6- March 24, 1987 4. The City's budget process will continue to be re- fined. Two-year forecasting of expenses and revenues will be explored. Peterson then asked for discussion relative to other items on the list or any other goals that would be important. Pidcock said that if it is the City's policy to have better roadways, she thought it would be very important that the City Manager give his support to the liaison bodies involved. She said if we do not show our interest in improved roadways, we may lose one of the biggest employers in this area. Peterson said he thought the City's position is very well conveyed and expressed by the active involvement of one or more Council members in the groups or task forces involved. Pidcock said she was suggesting that the City Manager show his interest by such means as notifying Council members of meetings, being aware of what the groups are doing, and letting the rest of us be aware of what's going on in such groups as the Southwest Corridor Coalition. Bentley noted that, while the City has sent representatives to meetings, we haven't yet signed off on a Joint Powers' Agreement or anything that gives the Coalition our official "stamp of approval." Peterson said none of us disagree with the importance of the highway efforts, but he felt that at this point we are trying to identify critically important subgoals. Pidcock said she did not expect Mr. Jullie to attend the meetings, but rather she was suggesting that he communicate with the Council regarding the time and place of meetings of the various groups. Regarding Mr. Anderson's concern about other important issues, Harris said there was nothing that precludes the City Manager from having goals over and above those the Council sets for him, and we should encourage him to have those extra goals. Anderson said it is important for the Council to know specifi- cally what some of those extra goals are, as we want to know where our manager is going. He said those subgoals should be listed for each year so that the Council can add or sub- tract from the list and determine how successful we have been in the evaluation process. Bentley suggested that we direct the redrafting of the list to Mr. Jullie and, within the framework of the Evaluation Form, have him list the four goals defined. He also suggested that he include a separate sheet that would show some of the t . City Council Minutes -7- March 24, 1987 k measurable steps along the way towards those final goals and include an attachment that outlines the additional goals that he and the Council feel are of equal importance to those listed on the evaluation. Anderson said he would like to be sure to have something that is definable, something that someone can take a look at and live with. Bentley said he hoped our choosing four goals that are quantifiable will set a precedent for the future. Harris noted that some of these goals will require rework to make the role of the City Manager in that goal more speci- fic. V. OTHER BUSINESS Anderson said some of' us wanted to ask Mr. Lambert about the Park Bond Referendum results. Jullie said they had discussed Mr. Lambert's preparing something on our options within the next 60 days. A discussion followed regarding the timing for a possible second referendum. Bentley noted that he, Mrs. Harris, and Mayor Peterson met last Friday to certify the results of the referendum, and at that time asked Mr. Jullie to go to the Staff and determine our options. Pidcock said she would like to have a discussion regarding Mr. Opheim's resignation on the Agenda for the next Council meeting. Peterson said he was very uncomfortable with this situation and was reluctant to put it on the Agenda. He suggested that Mrs. Pidcock could discuss this with Mr. Jullie. Pidcock said she believed she had the right to include it on the Agenda. Harris suggested that Mrs. Pidcock meet with Mr. Jullie in order to determine if Mr. Opheim wishes to have his concerns made public and if it is something that concerns a policy decision. She said discussion of' that policy could then be brought to the Council. VI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris, to adjourn the meeting at 4:15 PM. '7`aJ UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 7, 1987 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Jean Harris, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Community Services Robert Lambert Director of Public Works Eugene A. � . Dietz, and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: All members were present. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following items were added to the Agenda: X. A. 1 . Pidcock - Report on Southwest Corridor Coalition; X. A. 2. Pidcock - Policy for Councilmember expenses. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Agenda and Other Items of Business as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES A. Special City Council meeting held Tuesday, March 10, 1987 The following changes were made to the Minutes: page 1, paragraph five, sentence 1 -- change "development." to "development once development is initiated or completed.", and page 3, paragraph 1, sentence 1 -- change "river corridor" to creek corridor". MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris, to approve the Minutes of the Special City Council meeting held March 10, 1987, as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. B. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 17, 1987 t City Council Minutes -2- April 7, 1987 4 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Minutes of the regular City Council meeting held March 17, 1987, as published. Motion carried unanimously. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List B. Final Plat Approval for Bluestem Hills 2nd Addition Location: Southeast of Bennett Place and Northwest of Meade Lane, (Resolution No, 87-65) C. Final Plat Approval for Bluffs West 6th Addition Location: East of Homeward Hills Road and North of Riverview Road. (Resolution No. 87-77) D. Receive Feasibility Report for Sunnybrook Road Street and Utility Improvements and Set Public Hearing for May 5, 1987, I.C. 52-109 (Resolution No. 87-78) E. Final Plat for Prairie Acres (Southwest Corner of CSAH 1 and Bennett Place) Resolution No. 87-79 F. Receive 100% Petition for Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Utility Improvements for Shady Oak Ridge and Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications,I.C. 52-119 (Resolution No. 87-81) G. Final Plat for Carmel 6th. Addition Location: Fallbrook Road and North of Driftwood Road. (Resolution No. 87-82) H. WILLIAMS MINI-STORAGE, by Bob Williams. 2nd Reading of Ordinance #11-87, Rezoning from Rural to I-2 Park; Approval of Addendum to Developer's Agreement for William's Mini- Storage; and Adoption of Resolution #87-84, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #11-87 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. Rezoning from Rural to I-2 Park for 0.5 acres. Location: East of Highway #169, south of Anderson Lakes Parkway. (Ordinance #11-87, Rezoning; Resolution #87-84, Authorizing Summary and Publication) • I. Resolution No. 87- S 8 , Proclaiming April 10, 1987 as Child Care Provider Day in Eden Prairie J. Request from James L. Cardinal for Council to recommend his reappointment by the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to the Riley, Purgatory, Bluff Creek Watershed Board of Managers MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve Items A - J on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes -3- April 7, 1987 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF MINNESOTA. Request for Compre- hensive Guid Plan Amendment from Medium Density Resi- dential and Public Open Space to Elementary/Secondary School on 55.6 acres; Zoning District Change from Rural to Public on 55.6 acres; and Preliminary Plat of 55.6 acres into one lot for construction of a private school. The request also includes a change of the City Code, Chap- ter 11, Section 11.35, entitled "Public District," Sub- division 2, to allow private schools as a permitted use and private schools with boarding as a permitted use, and requiring park dedication of such uses. Location: North of Bryant Lake, west of Rowland Road, east of Beach Road and I-494. (Ordinance #12-87, Chapter 11 Ordinance Changes Resolution #87-60, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; Ordinance #10-87, Rezoning; Resolution #87-61, Preliminary Plat) Continued Public Hearing from March 17, 1987 City Manager Jullie noted this item was continued from the March 17, 1987 meeting as there were several issues unresolved at that meeting. He said a draft of the Develop- er's Agreement was prepared and forwarded to the proponents last week. He thought a reasonable consensus had been reached on several of the items as a result of a meeting on Monday to discuss the terms of the agreement. Planning Director Enger noted that normally a Developer's Agreement is drafted after the First Reading of the Zoning Ordinance; however, because of the number of issues out- standing and the requirement that the Comprehensive Guide Plan change be reviewed by the Metropolitan Council, Staff prepared the Developer's Agreement to make sure there is no misunderstanding if the Council approves the Guide Plan and Zoning changes. Enger highlighted the major items addressed in the draft Developer's Agreement. He noted that the Planning Com- mission was concerned about the possible conflict of future development phases with a significant tree stand on the property. The method chosen to address this concern was to restrict the size of the zoning area to approximately 39 acres, all of which is outside of the floodplain and outside of the major treed areas on the site. The 39.5 acres would encompass the proposed Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the International School. He said the 39.5 acres will be rezoned to Public and the Comprehensive Guide Plan will be changed to Elementary/Secondary Education; the balance of the 55 acres will be Public Open Space on the Comprehen- sive Guide Plan and zoned as Rural. �l r, City Council Minutes -4- April 7, 1987 Enger said the School hired a traffic consultant to work with the issue of access to the Crosstown Highway at Beach Road. The consultants suggested moving the School's access to Beach Road a couple of hundred feet to the west; as a result, there will be no additional right-of-way required from International School, and the County can proceed with the construction of the intersection with no cost to the School. He said Staff concurs with that suggestion. He said agreement had been reached on the width of the private road through the campus whereby the road will be 32 feet wide for about 200 feet at the entrance, narrow to 28 feet for approximately 900 feet, and then widen to 32 feet to provide turning movements at the separate parking facilities. Regarding emergency vehicle access, Enger said International School has agreed to work with Hennepin County Park Reserve to obtain an emergency vehicle easement out to Rowland Road on the east. He said the School has agreed to maintain the 20-foot wide road and that the road will be constructed so that it will handle heavier emergency vehicle traffic. Enger said that International School has applied for and does require zoning of both Phase 1 and Phase 2 development; however, specific details for construction have been worked out for Phase 1 only. Therefore the recommendation is for the School to consent to a review by the City that is identical to rezoning when Phase 2 is ready, even though zoning of Phase 2 is included in this agreement. Enger said there is a covenant in the agreement that pre- cludes exterior lighting of the athletic facilities and limits lighting in the parking areas to 20-foot high down- case lights. There is no reference to architectural design in the agreement. Enger said there has been no resolution of the amount or the payment of cash park fees, nor has there been resolu- tion of the parkland acquisition by Hennepin County and the Met Council. He said they have received a letter from the Met Council that indicates they have placed this item within their 90-day review process for the Comprehensive Guide Plan change. In the past the City Council has handled this either by waiting until the Met Council has completed their review or by acting contingent on the Met Council signing off on the Comprehensive Guide Plan change. Peterson noted that 90 days for approval by the Met Council would be almost fatal to the project and asked what pro- ponent could do if the City Council gives approval con- tingent to the Met Council approval. City Attorney Pauly { ., City Council Minutes -5- April 7, 1987 said that rezoning could not be effected until Met Council approval is obtained; however, consideration could be given to a grading permit prior to the rezoning. City Manager Jullie said he had suggested at the meeting on Monday that a $30,000 cash park fee would be approp- riate under the circumstances. He said they also dis- cussed the availability of the School's playfield facilities for use by the general public. Bentley asked why there were no comments relative to archi- tectural design in the Developer's Agreement. Enger replied that, while the Planning Commission recommended that the architecture of the School be modified to have a more residential character, the architecture did not seem to be an issue with the Council at the last meeting. Bentley then asked if we don't normally reference some essence of architectural design in the Developer's Agree- ment. Enger said there is a full set of exterior archi- tectural elevations included as an exhibit. Referring to the Staff memo of March 24, 1987 regarding zoning for private schools in other communities, Anderson noted that several cities have used a temporary use per- mit rather than a public use for private schools. He asked if it would be possible to use the temporary use permit until we have time to really settle on something. Pauly said we have tended to not adopt a system of special or conditional use except for interim use permits in the Major Center Area,as such a system takes away some of the control the City may exercise over development. Pauly noted that, in this instance, some performance standards were added to the Code amendment and it is limited to a specific area so that it will not presently apply to all of the public areas in the City. Harris asked for further information on the two issues on which agreement has not been reached. Director of Community Services Lambert said the question of park fees or dedication seems to be the only unresolved issue at this point. Referring to his memo of April 1, 1987, Lambert said three or four questions must be answered in resolving this issue; the primary question being whether this is a subdivision and, if so, does it trigger the requirement of paying park fees or dedicating parkland. Pauly said this issue is purely one of definition, and the State statute defines subdivision as a division of land into two or more parcels of tract-lot land or area under common ownership. He said this situation would seem City Council Minutes -6- April 7, 1987 to fit that definition as there are three parcels of land under one ownership and two of the three are being sold. He said another element is that it looks as if a portion of this property will be sold to the Hennepin County Park Reserve, and that would constitute a sub- division. He said the question of the amount of dedica- tion depends on the answer to the question of what park needs are reasonably generated as a result of this devel- opment. Jim Steilen, attorney for proponent, said there have been on-going discussions with the Park Reserve District. In a discussion with Park Board Chairman David Latvaaho late this afternoon, he reviewed what he thought was their agreement and Latvaaho authorized Steilen to say that he is in agreement on the following issues; the International School will convey fee title to the floodplain knoll which includes the cartway to the Park Board for park purposes; and the School will convey an easement to the Park Board for a triangular piece of property adjacent to Nine-Mile Creek for the development of a trail system. Steilen said discussion continues as to the cost and purchase price of the property to be conveyed to the Park Board; however, they have agreed to continue negotiations for 30 days and if they are unable to reach a mutually satisfactory price at that time, they have consented to condemnation to determine a fair market value. Steilen said various agreements have been made as to fencing, shrub-screening, and use of the cartway. He said they have agreed to utility easements across the property to the extent necessary, and subject to their approval of the alignment. He said they agreed that the School can use the floodplain for a science laboratory and can con- struct a floating trail/bridge to connect School property to the knoll. Steilen said the one area in which they have not reached agreement is the extent to which the property conveyed to the Park Board will be subject to restrictive covenants. He said the school had asked that the property not be built upon. The staffs of the respective parties will meet to determine what possibly might be built by the Park District at any time in the future and if such construc- tion would be permissible to the School. If a First Reading was given tonight and approval of the Developer's Agreement was given, Bentley asked if any portion of the Developer's Agreement could be left contin- gent upon finalization at Second Reading, in particular City Council Minutes -7- April 7, 1987 the final arrangements regarding cash park fees. Pauly said he thought it would be possible; however, he cautioned that if the proposal were to be denied, it would be much stronger for the City to do so on the basis of a Guide Plan change than to approve it conditionally on achieving some park dedication. Bentley said the problem is that leaves us with the choice of hammering out an agreement tonight, continuing the entire matter, or recommending denial. He said that doesn't leave us the option of allowing negotiations to be completed. Tracy Whitehead, representing proponent, said there had been a lot of interaction within this process and that there are two issues outstanding. She said the question of park fees is still an issue and, after discussing this with the owners, they are willing to allow the facilities to be used for special purposes and they also would be willing to pay $15,000 to the City for park purposes. Regarding the issue of Met Council approval, Whitehead said the lawyer and one of the staff people for the Met Council said this is something that Steve Keefe can decide to take off the 90-day track. She said their feeling was that if the Park Reserve District and the International School could agree on a process by which the land could be conveyed, they would not stand in the way and would recom- mend the fast approval. Mark Johnson of the City Attorney's office, reviewed the latest revisions of the Developer's Agreement: the removal of reference to dedication of right-of-way for Highway 62; deletion of references to construction and design of the intersection for Hightway 62; deletion of construction access; and addition of a complete description of the emergency vehicle access on page two. Referring to Exhibit C of the agreement, Bentley said Items 3 and 4 appear to be the critical items as to how we proceed. He noted that he was disappointed that there had not been resolution on the issue of park fees and dedication before this meeting. Peterson asked Pauly to review the rationale of tying the charging of cash park fees to the subdivision process. Pauly said the historical reason was that subdivision requires streets, utilities and public services; and it was then appropriate to require dedication as that repre- sents a more intensive use. He said the proposed use also must result in a need for additional park facilities. f City Council Minutes -8- April 7, 1987 5 Bentley asked for a clarification of Item 4 on Exhibit C. Pauly said that is a boiler-plate provision in the event of land dedication rather than cash park fees. Pauly noted that the City does have an agreement with the Met Council committing to use its best efforts to acquire land in lieu of cash park fees and then being in a posi- tion to sell that to the Hennepin County Park Reserve District. A discussion followed regarding land dedica- tion or cash park fees as it related to the City's agree- ment with the Met Council. Bentley said he didn't find any language in the Developer's Agreement that requires a land dedication. Pauly said that was correct because the agreement was drafted with the idea that it would be cash park fees in lieu of dedi- cation. Bentley then asked Pauly if the intent of the discussion with the Met Council attorneys was that the land dedica- tion would become a moot point if there were an acceptable cash park fee resolution from our perspective, or are they insistent on the land dedication. Pauly said the Met Council attorneys did not indicate whether they felt the City would be using it's best efforts under those circum- stances. For discussion purposes Bentley suggested that: the cash park fee be made at $15,000; an amendment to the Developer's Agreement to allow public use of facilities be worked out with the understanding that such an agreement represents equivalent value to cash park fees; that those two items be accepted in lieu of dedication; and then the issue of that property purchase is something left to the attorneys. Pidcock said she was under the impression they had donated land to the Park Board. Peterson said they are negotiating a sale, and if negotiations fail, they will accept con- demnation proceedings. Referring to Mr. Lambert's memo of April 1st, Pidcock said she thought the definition of subdividing involved a lot of new owners and, in this case, we are talking about one owner. She said she thought this was different from a regular subdivision where pieces are being handed to a lot of new owners. Pauly said it is different from normal in terms of degree; however, the technical definition suggests the possibility of only two owners after the subdivision is completed, as is the case here. Bentley noted that a subdivision does not require two or more owners, as in the case of an owner who subdivides into i '- one lot and an outlot. 7Cl • City Council Minutes -9- April 7, 1987 Harris asked if there is ever an occasion where the finding of need supersedes subdivision. Pauly said the question of subdivision must be answered affirmatively before the question of need is considered. Harris asked if it was possible that the use of facilities might be offered during the summer or at other times when the School is closed. Ms. Whitehead said the owners are very concerned about who uses them, how it is used, and the liability issues, so it would not be possible to use it except on an "asked-for and agreed-upon basis". Pidcock asked Lambert to elaborate on the survey that indicates private schools use a considerable number of public facilities. Lambert said Staff had contacted cities where various private schools are located and had asked if the schools were using city facilities for their programs. He said about 50% of the schools use facilities such as tennis courts, soccer fields and softball fields. Pidcock then asked what was meant by a "very brief" survey. Lambert said it was done by telephone only. Pidcock asked if the cities were con- tacted rather than the schools themselves. Lambert said that was correct. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to amend the draft Developer's Agreement to include under Item 3 of Exhibit C that: 1. Proponent will pay a $15,000 cash park fee; and 2. An amendment will be added to the Developer's Agreement which will allow public use of the International School facilities. Peterson noted that this motion means the Council con- siders this a subdivision, so he thought it was important to discuss the compensating value in return to the City, such as the value in use of the athletic facilities, and also why the fee is set at $15,000. Pidcock said she thought it was a tremendous attribute to have such a school in our City, that the green space around the school was a benefit, and that the school will not need as many parks as other developments would. Peterson said he agreed they would not need as many faci- lities in the beginning stages of development but that would change as they approach the maximum of 1400 students. City Council Minutes -10- April 7, 1987 Anderson said it will start out as an elementary school so the demands will not be as great; however, the needs for students at the secondary level will become much greater. Bentley said the rationale for his motion was a $15,000 cash park fee and an arbitrary value of $24,000 for use of their facilities by the public. Pidcock asked how many secondary students will be attend- ing the school. Ms. Whitehead said it ultimately will be 450-550 students. Pidcock then asked how much use that number of students would require of public facili- ties. Anderson said the athletic teams would probably use public facilities. Ms. Whitehead said she did not see athletics being a major portion of the International School's program. Harris said she thought this school is going to be a very real benefit to the community; however, she did be- lieve that this is a subdivision. She said she has been grappling with what this means in terms of future use and has a great difficulty putting a dollar value on this. � l Harris asked Lambert what he would see as a reasonable resolution of this. Lambert responded that he would be more comfortable coming down to $15,000 if there were a more liberal definition from the developer regarding public use of their facilities. Lambert said he had difficulty putting a value on the use of the facilities "for special occasions." Peterson said without a more specific and generous response to that question he would have to say he was against the motion because he could not see compensating value back to the City. Anderson said one of the main concerns is liability and asked if it would be possible to arrange for the City's liability insurance to cover public use of the school's facilities and also for the City to help with maintenance. Lambert said that had been discussed briefly but that City liability coverage does not meet their requirements, and he didn't know if we could get as much as they require. Peterson asked if it is possible to indemnify International # School so that they are not liable whenever the property is being used for City-sponsored functions. Pauly said it would be possible to indemnify the School but we might be taking on additional risk that would be unac- ceptable. City Council Minutes -11- April 7, 1987 Ms. Whitehead said they would agree to continue to allow the community to use their facilities for special events to be scheduled through Mr. Lambert and to pay $15,000 in park fees now and another $15,000 in five years. Jullie said Staff believes that is a very reason- able proposal at this point. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to amend Item 1 of his motion to read: 1. Proponent will pay a $30,000 cash park fee; $15,000 of which will be paid at this time and $15,000 to be paid in five years. Anderson said he thought both parties have come a long way and proponent has many different things they are giving in addition to the $30,000 in cash park fees, including such things as the acreage to the Park Reserve District as well as opening the corridor from Beach Road to Rowland Road. VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT: Motion carried unanimously. VOTE ON THE MOTION AS AMENDED: Motion carried unanimously. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to close the Public Hearing and to give 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 12-87 amending Chapter 11 of the City Code, subject to approval by the Metropolitan Council of the amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan including as it relates to park and open space use of the subject property and subject S` to the execution and delivery of a Developer's Agreement. 3` Anderson asked if our rezoning this to public puts us in any difficulty with future schools who might ask for the same type of rezoning. Pauly said the proposed ordinance was revised to limit use of the public district for school purposes to this parcel only. Anderson said he wanted to � . make sure there were no legal entanglements for us on this question. VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously. III ' MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to adopt Resolution No. 87-60, approving the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, subject to approval by the Metropolitan Council of the amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan including as it relates to park and open space use of the subject property. Motion carried unanimously. )v4 t City Council Minutes -12- April 7, 1987 l MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to give 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 10-87 for Rezoning, subject to itan Council to theroval by the Comprehensive eGuide lPlan including fashite a relates t to park and open space use of the subject property and subject to the execution and delivery of a Developer's Agreement. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt Resolution No. 87-61, approving the Preliminary Plat of International School of Minnesota, subject to approval by the Metropolitan Council of the amendment to the Com- prehensive Guide Plan including as it relates to park and open space use of the subject property and further subject to the final adoption of Ordinances 10-87 and 12-87. Motion carried unanimously. Pauly said it would be appropriate to ask proponent if they are in agreement with what has been proposed. Mr. Steilen said, while they were in agreement with the concepts and discussion at the meeting yesterday, he would like to have an opportunity to review the draft agreement. Pauly then asked if they do agree to the substance of the provisions contained in the agreement and discussed here tonight. Steilen said they do. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Developer's Agreement in the revised form presented in the meeting and discussed by the City Attorney, together with the amendments and changes discussed with regard to the cash park fees and use of the School facilities by the City for special events. Motion carried unanimously. B. AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 11, CITY CODE. Amending City Code Chapter TT, Entitled Land Use Regulation (Zoning), and Readoption of City Code Chapter 11 in its Entirety as Amended Herein, 1) by Renumbering Several Paragraphs Under Definitions; 2) by Including Definition for a Maxi- mum Base Area Ratio; 3) by Changing Special Requirements for Filing and Recording of Legal Descriptions and Zoning District Changes; 4) by Including a Column Designating Maximum Base Area Ratio; 5) by Amending Mechanical Equip- ment Screening Standards; 6) by Including; Provisions for Required Landscaping in Residential Districts; 7) by Changing Provisions Relating to Off-street Parking Space Requirements for Office Use and Amending Exterior Material Design Standards to Omit Factory Fabricated and Finished Metal Framed Panel Construction; 10) by Adding Golf Courses as Permitted Uses in Rural Districts Exclusively; 1. 11) by Providing for a Maximum Square Footage Requirement for Supporting Commercial Sales and Services to Office City Council Minutes -13- April 7, 1987 Users within Large Office Structures; 12) by Adding a Requirement Limiting the Square Footage Maximums for Neighborhood Commercial Services and Community Commercial Services; 13) by Providing for a Maximum Percentage of Gross Building Area That Supporting Minor Commercial Uses Can Occupy in Industrial Districts; 14) by Adding a Requirement to Specify "End Land Use" After Land Altera- tion Occurs and Identify Zoning of Property After Land Alteration Occurs Under Section Entitled Mining Operation and Land Alteration Regulations; 15) by Providing for a Maximum Size of Name Plates as Permitted Under Home Occupation Code; 16) by Renumbering Several Paragraphs Under Subdivision 2, Entitled Sign Permits; 17) by Adding a Definition for Sign Base; 18) by Adding Area Identifica- tion Regulation Criteria Under Subdivision 3 Entitled General Provisions; 19) by Adding Sign Base Criteria Under Residential Districts; 21) by Amending That Portion of the Commercial Sign Ordinance by Consolidating Per- mitted Commercial Sign Criteria Under One Heading for All Commercial Districts; 22) by Deleting Paragraph D of Subdivision Four of Section Entitled Sign Permits; 23) by Amending That Portion of the Office Sign Ordinance by Including Provisions for Wall Signs for Each Elevation and Including Sign Base Criteria; 24) by Adding Sign Base Criteria to Industrial Districts; 25) by Adding Sign Base Criteria to Public Districts; 26) by Relettering Para- graphs under Section Entitled Sign Permits; 27) by Adopting Zoning Map Entitled "Zoning Map of the City of Eden Prairie," dated January, 1987; and 28) Readoption of City Code Chapter 11 in its Entirety as Amended Herein. (Ordinance #9-87) Continued Public Hearing from March 17, 1987 City Manager Jullie noted that this item was continued from the March 17th meeting in order to prepare the additional information contained in the Staff memo of March 31, 1987. Enger said both the entire City Code and the official zoning map are available here tonight for review by the Council. Regarding Section 2, Bentley asked why this definition of maximum "base area" ratio is being included. Planning Director Enger said in several of our zoning districts there is a Floor-Area-Ratio allowed for a single-story building and a higher F.A.R. for a multiple story building. He said this revision is proposed in order to put the way in which the ordinance has been administered into legally- defensible terms within the ordinance. i :; City Council Minutes -14- April 7, 1987 Bentley asked if the wording in Section 11 remains relative to permitting those uses in a large structure only. Enger said it does. Regarding Section 12, Bentley asked what effect this would have had on the Normandale Tennis Club proposal if it had been in effect at that time. Enger said it would not have had an effect, and the same size building would have been allowed. Enger noted that the square foot maximums were chosen to make the zoning code con- sistent with the categories in the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Bentley then asked why Sections 23 and 24 regarding sign base criteria were included. Enger said there is no maximum square footage in the Office District currently and Staff felt that we could end up with a fairly exces- sive size sign if there was no cap on the maximum size. This would put a cap of 50 square feet on the sign size. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Bentley, to close the Public Hearing and to give First Reading of Ordinance No. 9-87. Motion carried unanimously. V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 22615 - 33790 and Nos. 33815 - 34031 Regarding Item 33618 to Ken Lewis & Assoc., Pidcock asked if this item was for the appraisal of the lot for the CDBG housing program. Jullie said that was correct. She then asked about Item 33626 to the Suburban Rate Authority. Jullie said that amount is for our membership dues for this organization which acts as a kind of consumer's advocate for the City regarding utilities. Regarding Item 33649 to Intl. Union of Operating Eng., Harris asked what this amount for union dues represents. Jullie said this represents withholding amounts. Pidcock asked what the legal services were for in Item 33917 to L. Lehman & Associates. Jullie said that is actually for consulting services on the landfill issue. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Payment of Claims Nos. 33615 - 33790 and Nos. 33815 - 34031, Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Harris, Pidcock and Peterson voted "aye." VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 13-87, Repealing Section 2.12, Entitled"Develoapment Commission"Lof the City Code 2u ) City Council Minutes -15- April 7, 1987 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to give 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 13-87, repealing Section 2.12, Entitled "Development Commission", of the City Code. Motion carried unanimously. VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Request for Wine License by Beijing City Manager Jullie noted that the Council had asked that liquor-type license requests be considered as a separate item from the regular Clerk's License List. Peterson asked if this is a license for wine only. Jullie said it is. Bentley said his concern was not necessarily for beer and wine licenses, but rather for liquor licenses. A discussion followed regarding the Council's request to consider this sort of request separately. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to approve the request by the owners of the Beijing Restaurant for an on-sale wine license. Motion carried unanimously. B. Request from Howard Peterson to appeal decision of the Board of Adjustments & Appeals regarding Variance Request P7-0$ City Manager Jullie referred to the Staff Report of April 1, 1987 relative to this request. Howard Peterson, 7021 Duck Lake Road, said the basis for his request is outlined in the letter he forwarded to the Council. He said he is a neighborhood resident as well as a member of the Riley-Purgatory Watershed District. He said he believes there is no basis for making Lot 10 into a buildable lot because it is a flooded lot. Jullie noted that at this point the Council would be deciding whether or not to consider reviewing this; if the Council chooses to consider review, it would be scheduled at a future meeting. Mayor Peterson asked about Mr. Peterson's questioning of Variance Request #86-11. Planning Director Enger said the current request for variance deals with the side yard setback, while any reference regarding front yard setback and shoreland has lapsed. He said the only thing the Council may consider is the 10-foot side yard setback rather than the regular 15-foot setback. l��l City Council Minutes -16- April 7, 1987 C Bentley asked what the side yard setback is on the adjacent house. Jim Touve, 1440 Sumter Ave. No., Golden Valley, said the proposed house on that lot would have a setback in excess of 15 feet. Harris asked Peterson where his home was in relationship to the proposed building. Mr. Peterson said it is south- east of the site. Harris then asked him what his interest was in this item. Mr. Peterson said it was from a personal standpoint and from the Watershed's standpoint and that, under the circumstances, it does represent substantial deviations which do not lead to a good building site. He said he was concerned that we may be putting ourselves in the position of setting a precedent. Bentley said he appreciated his bringing this to the Council's attention. He said the Board cf Appeals has reviewed this request and he didn't think this situation has a significant impact; therefore he didn't see any reason why we should do a review of the Board's decision. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Harris, to deny the request from Howard Peterson to appeal a decision of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Motion carried unani- mously. C. Request from Leslie Davis LEarth Protector, regarding the Environmental Defense Fund MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the request of Leslie Davis to speak to the City Council regarding a report from the Environmental Defense Fund. Motion carried unanimously. Leslie Davis, of Earth Protector, called attention to the findings of the Environmental Defense Fund on the environmental hazards of ash from incineration of muni- cipal solid waste dated March 19, 1987. He said the evidence is increasing that ash from garbage incinerators is more toxic than previously thought. In view of the proposed incinerator for Hennepin County and the con- comitant need to dispose of the ash from that facility, he wanted to be sure that Eden Prairie was aware of the problems with such waste material. He said it has been determined there is a good deal of dioxin in ash. He referred to recent information from the Center for Biology of Natural Systems in New York regarding a study of an intensive recycling system for urban household wastes. He urged that Eden Prairie seriously consider implementing similar garbage-management policies for the City. City Council Minutes -17- April 7, 1987 Peterson thanked Mr. Davis for supporting our community and for supporting the citizens around the landfill in their concerns over that facility. Anderson said approximately a year ago we ran a study about the feasibility of starting a collection process. He said Mr. Jullie's goals for this year include finding a better means of disposing of garbage in the City, and he hoped we would be able to come up with a better solu- tion. Susan Varmaloff said she understood that two months ago the City promised to have a plan to present to their group and she was concerned that they haven't received anything yet. Peterson said that is being reviewed and is not being ignored. VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS There were no reports. IX. APPOINTMENTS There were none. X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Pidcock - Report on Southwest Corridor Coalition Pidcock said the Southwest Corridor Coalition are attempting to invite the governor to Hazeltine during the morning hours when the traffic is bad. She said they will get the actual time at short notice and she asked everyone to try to attend this event in order to make the governor aware of the bad conditions on Highway 5. 2. Pidcock - Policy for Councilmember Expenses Pidcock referred to an article in a recent issue of the Minnetonka Sailor and said she would like to develop a policy of reimbursement to Council members for seminars or conventions they attend in order to avoid such an article being written about Eden Prairie. Harris asked if the City already has policies that address the reimbursement of actual cost. City Manager Jullie said it does, and the Councilmember who incurs such a cost would fill out a claim and City Council Minutes -18- April 7, 1987 would be eligible for reimbursement. A discussion ensued as to whether an actual policy regarding reimbursement of expenses had been adopted. Pidcock said she thought there should be something in writing. Harris said she thought the policies in place for Staff should be the same policies to govern Council reimbursement. B. Report of City Manager 1. Municipal Cemeteries Referring to the Staff memo of April 2, 1987 regarding the proposed acquisition of Pleasant Hills Cemetery, City Manager Jullie said this subject has come to our attention over the last several months. He said Stu Fox had discussed the operation with representa- tives and wrote the memo of December 18, 1986 to Bob Lambert regarding this subject. Bentley said that he understood the official request was that we acquire Pleasant Hills Cemetery and that, while there is no official request from Eden Prairie Cemetery, we expect to receive one at some point. Jullie said that was correct. Peterson said he felt that a cemetery is one of the components of a City; therefore, it may be a reasonable request that we assume this responsibility as an additional service to the residents. Harris said she was in favor of pursuing this but was not sure what the charges to residents would be. Peterson said the charges would be the usual costs connected with burial, but there would be no adminis- trative costs to residents. Anderson said the maintenance of the cemeteries has become a difficult burden placed on residents of the community and he thought we should investigate assuming responsibilities for the cemeteries. Stu Fox said Pleasant Hills has passed a resolution for the City to acquire it, if we desire to do so. He said the Rogers, representing Eden Prairie Cemetery, are here to find out how the City feels about acquisi- tion of a cemetery. Nancy Nicklay, 16011 Lake Shore Drive, representing Eden Prairie Cemetery, said they are interested in (', City Council Minutes -19- April 7, 1987 what is going on in other cemeteries. She said that their polls indicate the families with burial plots in Eden Prairie Cemetery do not wish to have the faci- lity taken over by the City. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to accept the proposal for transfer of ownership from Pleasant Hills Cemetery and to direct the City Attorney to conclude all the necessary transfer arrangements. Pidcock said she would like to see the City Attorney give some further information on this and investigate the ramifications before we formally acquire this facility. She said she would also like to see if there are some churches that might be interested in taking over the facility. Anderson asked Pauly if he saw any problems with this action. Pauly said he had not reviewed this from a legal perspectives however, he would expect to come back to the Council if he discovered any problems. Peterson asked if the motion to accept the proposal for transfer of ownership was the correct wording at this time. Anderson said he would prefer to see action pending the results of the City Attorney's investigation. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to add the phrase "pending the results of the City Attorney's review of all necessary transfer arrangements." Harris asked whether the amendment included the suggestion to investiaget alternative solutions such as a church taking over responsibility for the cemetery. Bentley said it did not. VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT: Motion carried with Pidcock opposed. VOTE ON THE MOTION AS AMENDED: Motion carried with Pidcock opposed. Pidcock said she opposed the motion because she would like to see some alternative actions looked into before we just accept ownership. Jim Brown, representing the Pleasant Hills Cemetery, said they have tried alternatives and that the churches have transient populations and are not interested in running a cemetery. He said the interest on the 7';: City Council Minutes -20- April 7, 1987 endowment fund for the cemetery has more than paid for the upkeep of the lots. He said the average age of their Board of Directors is 75, and they haven't been able to get people to take over their jobs. Harry Rogers, representing the Eden Prairie Cemetery, said their cemetery operates like the Pleasant Hills Cemetery but, after contacting 50% of the families with burials there, most of the families did not want the City to take over the job there. 2. Proposal for Strategic Planning Process Referring to the Staff memo of April 2, 1987 regarding the Strategic Planning process, City Manager Jullie said they now have a recommendation for retaining a consultant and getting involved in the process. He said they are recommending that the proposal submitted by Barbara Arney through the Government Training Service be accepted. He said the estimated cost is very close to the budgetary allocation. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to adopt the Staff recommendation regarding the Strategic Planning process. Motion carried unanimously. A discussion followed regarding the dates scheduled for the meetings on the Strategic Planning process. Peterson asked that Ms. Swaggert be congratulated for the progress made on this issue, 3. Procedures for City Purchases Bentley said he appreciated the memo of April 2, 1987 laying out the procedures for City purchases. He said one of the problems that has arisen in the past occurs with the process by which consultants are selected. He said he would like to see a very speci- fic process by which a consultant is to be selected in addition to the procedures listed in the memo. He said there is a perception that the consultant may have a view that precludes some potential bidders. Pidcock said she thought it was a very good outline, but she would like to see some effort made to be sure that taxpayers in Eden Prairie are given the opportunity to bid on jobs in the City. Peterson asked if she meant to do something more proactive to get them to bid on projects. Pidcock said she was not sure how the process works, but she was suggesting City Council Minutes -21- April 7, 1987 we make sure our business people know when the City has jobs available and that they have an opportunity to bid on them. C. Report of City Attorney There was no report. D. Report of Director of Planning There was no report. E. Report of Director of Community_Services 1. Park Bond Referendum Referring to his memo of March 30, 1987, Director of Community Services Lambert said the issue tonight is to discuss the options available. At the Parks Com- mission meeting last night Paul Redpath urged the Commission to go right back with the same referendum as soon as possible. Lambert said Commission member Moe Cook believed we should wait a year and have some- one do a survey of those who voted to get input from those who did vote in order to determine if it should be reconstructed. Lambert said Bub Baker agreed with Cook, and the Commission ultimately voted 7-0 to hold a second referendum in early 1988 and to survey those who voted in the first referendum. Lambert said the Parks Commission did not support splitting the referendum into two questions as they believe the needs are very well justified and would like to see all the facilities constructed. He said they supported the priorities for buying parkland if there is no referendum. Lambert said there was a group of people present tonight from the Prairie East neighborhood who also were at the Parks Commission meeting last night. He said they supported everything on the referendum except for the proposed parking lot in Prairie East Park. Peterson asked if they knew it was a concept plan. Lambert said he explained that it was a con- cept plan and that before any development is done, the neighbors are notified and the details are worked out at a Parks Commission meeting. Anderson said the needs do not go away and expressed concern that his analysis of the vote by precinct City Council Minutes -22- April 7, 1987 indicated that in at least three precincts where a neighborhood park was proposed, those precincts voted against the referendum. He was also concerned about adding a second sheet of ice because of what has happened to the revenues at the ice arena. Lambert said the use of the ice during the summer months is an unknown and it dropped last year, possibly because three other arenas opened up for summer ice. He said the random sample survey would probably indicate whether that was a major concern. A discussion of the needs for a second sheet of ice followed. Harris said she liked the idea of doing a random sam- ple of those who voted to determine what their con- cerns were. She said she had a concern with the proposed timing for the second referendum and would suggest late spring or early summer as a better time. Bentley said he was opposed to the idea of hiring a consultant as he didn't think we are going to gain a great deal for the cost of such a survey. He said he thought it was a classic case of apathy and was con- cerned that some individuals in the community were disseminating grossly misleading information. He said he would like to have Mr. Jullie check with the City Attorney about the legality of people disseminating information without giving their names, as he believed there are ordinances that prohibit such actions. Bentley said he thought we should come back with a second referendum right away, and he was concerned that the Parks Commission voted 7-0 to delay the second referendum. He said he was also concerned about the state of affairs where residents do not become informed on an issue of significant importance and do not take the time to vote. Harris said it might not be necessary to hire a con- sultant for the survey, but the information obtained from a survey would be useful to determine the parti- cular items that were voted against or if the referen- dum needs to be repackaged. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to do a random sampling of voters in the Park Bond Referendum to determine the issues upon which their decisions were made and to use that information as input for a subsequent referendum. I: : City Council Minutes -23- April 7, 1987 Peterson asked if she was suggesting this be done by a consultant, in-house, or by an appointed commit- tee. Harris said perhaps it could be done in-house. A discussion followed regarding the possibility of performing the survey in-house. Lambert said a telephone survey would probably get more information but that would be difficult to do in-house. Anderson asked if a petition was required to run a referendum. Jullie said a petition isn't required but there are costs for a referendum, such as hiring election judges. Anderson then asked what the impact of such a petition would be. Jullie said it would only impact the Council as to the decision to hold another referendum or the timing of the referendum and would have no legal significance. Anderson said he was concerned about going against the Parks Commission recommendation as some of the community's hardest workers might feel slighted. He said he might be swayed if enough people showed him that they were in favor of coming right back on the referendum. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to amend the motion to direct Staff to determine the cost for such a study and return the information to the Council at the next meeting. Pidcock asked if the format used for the City Hall survey could be used for this one. Jullie said the City Hall Needs Committee did a survey, but they also retained a consultant. Peterson said he thought such a study is a good idea and that we could probably get an expert to give us advice for very little cost. Lambert said he thought the services of a consultant who could help structure the questions and give us the information on validity would not be very expensive. Anderson said he had a difficult time going through • this amount of time, effort and expense for the small amount of the population who took time to vote. Peterson said those are basically the people who are making the decisions for the community. Lambert commented that a review of those voting indicates the same people are voting each time. .(I City Council Minutes -24- April 7, 1987 Bentley reiterated that he was not in favor of this and that he thinks we are giving,too much validity to those who disseminated erroneous information. He said a decision should be based on its merits and not necessarily what a survey of the residents says. Peterson said he would tend to view the results of such a survey as advisory and not mandatory. VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT: Motion carried with Bentley and Anderson opposed. VOTE ON THE MOTION AS AMENDED: Motion carried with Bentley and Anderson opposed. F. Report of Director of Public Works There was no report. XI. NEW BUSINESS There was none. XII. ADJOURNMENT ` MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pideock, to adjourn the meeting at 11:20 PM. Motion carried unanimously. 7// CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST April 21, 1987 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) WATER SOFTNER Dolphin Construction Robert B. HIll Company E.D.M. Construction, Inc. Minnesota Water Treatment Edina Building Maintenance Hoyt Construction Co. Mamac Systems HEATING & VENTILATING Vanman Construction Oean's Heating & Air Conditioning Realistic Heating & Cooling, Inc. CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY) Alladin Pools, Inc. GAS FITTER J. B. Franklin Corporation Handyman Express Dean's Heating & Air Conditioning Kee Construction, Inc. New Image Builders Pool Pro, Inc. PEDDLAR Rogness Construction Seldon Construction, Inc. Glen Baron (Blue Bell Ice Cream) Swanson Builders, Inc. Weathertight Company MECHANICAL GAMES PLUMBING Gina Maria's Pizza Masterniece Pizza Aquarius Heating & Plumbing Wayne Burville Plumbing College City Plumbing TEMPORARY 3.2 BEER ON SALE Janecky Plumbing Lakeside Plumbing & Heating Optimist Club (Softball Tournament LeVahn Brothers,Inc. 4-25 & 26 & 5-2 & 3) These licenses have been aooroved by the denartment heads resnonsible for the licensed activity. Pat Solie, licensing I.d 717 • • • • -. . . . . ' . . . . . . . • • . . . . . . . . . . -. • - . • . . . . . . . . • . .• . • . , . RESOLUTION NO. 87-100 • PROC•LAlflTION• LOCAL CHAMBER Of' COtimERGE WEEe ignEREAS. chamcers of commerece were c rea tea in i itgto ouror oc a ousi nets: WHEAEA,,. cnamners of oommerece serve as an ev tension of robs tn tneir ,onmLnit : wHEPE . manners of con$merce aeveloo community leaders: WHEREAS.chamr,ers of commerce are tne snowcase of their t les: wHEPEr4S. cnamoers of commerce provide oroorams .for oersonal ana coolness ,powin; ltci , crari,oers of ::-)olmerce are a v Lai I ink Detween CUSIPESS and ti .n: ' 4HEREAS. Eden Prairie .;ramoer of Commerce oat t ion and ?rtrr,isiasm mitre it! iocoptin in whERSA3. Eder P,airie ,..hamDer o* ..0mlerce orovloe3 ,:ontinuind sunpnrt td ousiness and edJca Ii o mm .inn a r:e crooner or C'mmerce sir vrrrev i•.se t 30 ..i ,•esoure a torfit 1,2aaer Ir Loer P-at,t : . a cE cCt C 1015 - Limb -1 .,. nmer're SCL moo ,ral,ie. nInnenta. .n ,,ndr ni 711° knImnEr dt . • - . • • . • • - - • ORDINANCE NO. 9-87 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 11 ENTITLED "LAND USE REGULATIONS (ZONING)" AND READOPTION OF CITY CODE CHAPTER 11 IN ITS ENTIRETY AS AMENDED HEREIN, (1) BY RENUMBERING SEVERAL PARAGRAPHS UNDER DEFINITIONS; (2) BY INCLUDEING A DEFINITION FOR A -MAXIMUM BASE AREA RATIO; (3) BY CHANGING SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FILING AND RECORDING OF LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND ZONING DISTRICT CHANGES; (4) BY INCLUDING A COLUMN DESIGNATING MAXIMUM BASE AREA RATIO; (5) BY AMENDING MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING STANDARDS; (6) BY INCLUDING PROVISIONS FOR REQUIRED' LANDSCAPING IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS; (7) BY "CHANGING PROVISIONS RELATING TO OFF-STREET PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS FOR OFFICE USE AND COMMERCIAL RETAIL USE; '(8) BY MENDING OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS; (9) BY AMENDING EXTERIOR MATERIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TO OMIT FACTORY FABRICATED AND FINISHED METAL.FRAMED PANEL CONSTRUCTION (10) BY ;ADDING GOLF COURSES AS A PERMITTED USE IN RURAL DISTRICTS EXCLUSIVELY; (11) BY PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM SQUARE FEET,REQUIREMENT FOR SUPPORTING COYTIERCIAL- SALES AND SERVICES TO OFFICE USERS WITHIN'LARGE OFFICE STRUCTURES; (12) BY ADDING A REQUIREMENT LIMITING THE ?SQUARE FOOT. MAXIMUMS FOR NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL),SERVICES; (13) BY PROVIDING FOR A` MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE OF GROSS BUILDING AREA, SUPPORTING --MINOR COMMERCIAL`USES CM OCCUPY IN INDUSTRIAL ':DISTRICTS; (14) BY ADDING A REQUIREMENT TO SPECIFY "END LAND USE" AFTER"LAND,ALTERATION. OCCURS AND IDENTIFY.ZONING OF PROPERTY AFTER .'LAND ALTERATION OCCURS UNDER SECTION ENTITLED MINING OPERATION AND LAND ALTERATION REGULATIONS; (15) BY PROVIDING' FOR A MAXIMUM SIZE; OF NAME PLATES AS PERMITTED UNDER HOME OCCUPATION CODE; (16) BY .RENUMBERING SEVERAL PARAGRAPHS UNDER SUBDIVISION 2 ENTITLED SIGN PERMITS; (17) BY ADDING A DEFINITION FOR SIGN BASE; (18) BY ADDING AREA IDENTIFICATION REGULATION CRITERIA UNDER SUBDIVISION 3 ENTILTED GENERAL PROVISIONS; (19) BY ADDING SIGN BASE REGULATION CRITERIA UNDER SUBDIVISION 3 ENTILTED GENERAL PROVISIONS; (20) BY ADDING -.SIGN BASE CRITERIA TO ',RESIDENTIAL ( DISTRICTS; (21) BY MENDING THAT PORTION OF THE COMMERCIAL .SIGN"ORDINANCE BY CONSOLIDATING PERMITTED- COMMERCIAL SIGN CRITERIA UNDER..:ONE HEADING FOR ALL COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS; (22) BY DELETING -PARAGRAPH D OF SUBDIVISION FOUR OF SECTION ENTITLED SIGN PERMITS; (23) BY MENDING THAT PORTION OF THE OFFICE SIGN ORDINANCE BY INCLUDING PROVISIONS FOR WALL SIGNS FOR EACH ELEVATION AND INCLUDING SIGN BASE CRITERIA; (24) BY ADDING SIGN BASE CRITERIA TO INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS; (25) BY ADDING SIGN BASE CRITERIA TO 'PUBLIC DISTRICTS; (26) BY RELETTERING PARAGRAPHS' UNDER SECTION ENTITLED SIGN PERMITS; (27) BY ADOPTING ZONING MAP ENTITLED "ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE" DATED JANUARY 1987; (28) AND READOPTION OF CITY ;'CODE CHAPTER 11 IN ITS ENTIRETY AS AMENDED HEREIN. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS; ray • Section 1. Eden Prairie City Code Section 11.02 is amended by (V renumbering existing paragraphs 4 through 59 inclusive, as paragraphs 6 through 61. Section 2. Eden Prairie City Code Section 11.02 entitled "Definitions" is hereby amended by adding new paragraphs 4 and 5 which will read as follows: NEW 4. "Base Area" - The "Base Area" of a building or bui ld ii n s� shall be the sum of the gross Dior ziitaT areas of the first fToor of such building or uiTdings measureefrom the exterior faces T Liie exterior wa1Ts OF-from the centerline of party waTTs separating t5uiTdings. In particuTr, "Base Area" shall include: SA Elevator shafts and stairwells on the first floor. ,� Floor space used for mechanicai equipment where the structural headroom exceeds seven and one-hart= feet, except equipment, open or enclosed locked on the roof, Te.,eulkheads, water tanks and cooling towers. 40% of the porch when the porch is completely enclosed. 5. "Base Area Ratio" - The ratio of total base area to total lot area. — Section 3. Eden Prairie City Code Section 11.02, Subd.1 entitled "Establis mn—ent of Districts" is hereby amended by deleting paragraphs B and C and including new paragraphs B and C to read as follows: Subd. 1. Establishment of Districts. NEW B. The location and boundaries of the Districts estabiished in this ordinance are set forth on the zoning,map entitla. " oning Map of the City of Eden Prairie" anft>I legs T-descriytions of the land in each Districnrrhe zon ng map are on fire and open to publict a inspect on in a office of the Z`ity--Fianager. In case of ais`crepancy between legal description an zon ni 4 njE he legal decription wi1T prevail. C. For ease of reference ordinances cha in District zoning between November-6_,T1369 awn April 3 1984 are set forth in ity Code Chapter 25. Section 4. Eden Prairie City Code Section 11.03, Subd. 2.B. entitled "District Standards" shall be amended by including a column designating Maximum Base Area Ratio (BAR) for Office/Comnerciai/Industrial District as foliows: B. The following criteria shall apply to all Districts: Insert Chart • Group Usable MINIMUM LOT SIZE MlNltlllrl YARO/SCTOACK Site Open Max. Area per Space Max. Nt. of Area Dwelling Per Floor Main Sq.Ft. One Both Unit Dwelling Area Struc• RESIDENTIAL or Width Depth Front Side Sides Rear Sq.Ft. Unit Ratio ture DISTRICTS Acres Ft. Ft. Ft. Ft. Ft. Ft. i or Acres _10.Ft. IFAR) Ft. RURAL 10 AC 300 300 50 50 150 50 IOAC II/A N/A 20 R1-44 44,000 100 ISO 30 15 30 30 44,000 Park Oed. N/A 30 R1-22 22.000 90 125 30 15 30 25 22,000 Park Ded. lI/A 00 R1-13.5 12,500 85 100 30 10 25 20 13,500 Park Ded. N/A . 30 • R1.9.5 9,500 70 100 30 (Sce (See 20 9,500 Park Ded. .15-1 00 Item 5, Item 5, Story Pq.2881 Pg.2481 .25- - Multi. __ Story RM-6.5 13.000 90 100 30 10 25 20 6.500 Park Ded. 0.2-1 20 and 90 plus 1000 Story mini- sq. ft./ 0.4- mum Unit M.Iti front- Story aqe On - .. . Street R.O.W. III 2,5 25,000 150 IS0 15 25 S0 30 2.500 Park Ded. 0.3-1 45 plot 600 'Stott sq. (t./ 0 5- - -. Unit Multi Story ACCESSORY STRUCTURE Mtn. Min. Distance Distance to Side to Rear Off- Screening RESIDENTIAL Max. Lot Lot Street and DISTRICTS Nt. Line Line Loading Landscaping RURAL 30 30 30 N/A N/A R1-44 15 10 10 N/A N/A R1-22 15 10 10 N/A N/A R1-13.5 15 10 10 N/A N/A R1-9.5 15 5 5 N/A N/A R4-6.5 15 10 10 N/A Yes RM 2.5 15 10 10 Yes Yes ( (4-30-84) Chart 11.03 • • % l0� O , G..• O l'•Y r a. 1v ..r r ,. .r A Y:. r W<6 O S NI O N O S NI O e e^.. .O O O. y i N N O=.:.i ...... Y •Y Cam0. r• r r .'Pr, T.: P1 4I^ O e i- ., � fi. ,N W I:.,O 12 j Y q ( ry ON W ,ry I'e'2 I.M1 M1 S O : ry E. I. ., O W�e 12' I^ .. eIwFI O =WIe Iry � q o 5 0 0 <N O< ry ry < e` e N e O U (9-17-82 Criart 11.03 • •O C ..V .. 0 0 0 0 0 2 e V el r N -O '.y :.Y p ..0 O N 1 y I < L.r<a eNO LN 6.NeLN Ne L.i e.L •\ N 4 G g VP. O G P E. F E Y V u I • IF. I F.,'' `.1 u r I e. I ^ I L L • u < V - U I U I r ; Ii .ee. na W .. V (9-17-82) n Cr art 11.�i r •' g o r8 rW. v R 4 P K O SF1wt N ry w \ \ \ \ \ pp W O 9 4� O Y P � W K 4 IOV g k Y• K a a K CO.0 I y C. i m w Y a. a. u u. O v..I >. a. a. 4 >. } w w u( 4 t S O u4Ja .O. 2 2 .Oi .. N I ^ 1 U • E 9 N U O 3 Y U 4 6 Z U y C O U...O O - U U U U .. (9-17-82 �`1v • Section 5. Eden Prairie City Code Section 11.03 entitled "Establishment of Districts, Special Requirements and Performance Standards" is hereby amended by changing Subdivision 3, Paragraph G, Subparagraph 4, Item k to read as follows: Subd. 3. Special Requirements. G. Screening and Landscaping. 4. All landscaping shall be implemented in accordance with the following: NEW Mechanical Equipment Screening: All mechanical equip- ment possessing one or more or the fol owing characteristics sTTl be physicaTly screened from all public roads and an3iEent differing land ores, witri either natural of artificial materials1n a manner architectural yT—'infegra T to the buildings or building on tfie site: 1) Irregular in size and shape. Exposed and7or protruding fans grills, pipes, tubes, wires, vents. 3) Unfinished metal covering, exposed rivets, exposed seams. Section 6. Eden Prairie City Code Section 11.03 entitled "Establishment of Districts, Special Requirements and Performance Standards" is hereby amended by changing Suddivision 3, Paragraph 4, to include item m to read as follows: NEW Subd. 3. Special Requirements. G. Screening and Landscaping 4. All Landscaping shall be implemented in accordnace with the following: m. General Landscape for Residential Districts. In R1-44, R 1-22, R1-13.5, R1-9.5, and RM-6.S districts all exposed ground area— surroun ing the principle building and accessory buildings, which are not devoted to driveways, sidewalks, or patios, shall be landscaped wit rass,}rubs,, trees, or other ornaments landscape materia No landscaped area shall bemuse for the parkingo vehicles or storage or display of materials, sup ies, or merE andise. Section 7. Eden Prairie City Code Section 11.03 entitled "Establishment of Districts, pecia1 Requirements and Performance Standards" is hereby amended by changing off-street parking space requirement in Office and Commercial Districts set forth in Subdivision 3, Paragraph H, Subparagraph 4, Item d and e to read as follows: Subd. 3. Special Requirements.H. Off-Street Parking Facilities. i ". 4. Parking Requirements/Use District Land-Uses Off-Street Parking Space Requirements NEW OFC G.F.A. Ratio 1 - 60,000 sq. ft. 5.0/1000 sq. ft. 60,00I= 70,000 sq. 4.9/1000 sq. 70,001 = 80,000 sq. i 4.8/1000 sq. 1`t 80,001 = 90 000 sq. 1t. 4.7/1000 sq. 1•t. 90,001 = 100,000 sq. 1t. 4.6/1000 sq. ft. 100,001 =150 000 sq. 1•t. 4.2/1000 sq. Tit 150,001 _—p ius- sq. 1t. 4.0/1000 sq. e. Comm. Service Stations 10+ spaces where cars are serviced Motels, Hotels 1/guest room + 1/employee Restaurants & Lounges 1/three seats Banks 6.0/1000 ft. G.F.A. Retail Stores and Shops ( G.F.A. Ratio 0 - 10 000 sq. ft. 8.0/1000 sq. ft. 10 OOI= 100'000 sq. i•t_ 6.0/1000 se_TC 100,001_plus— sq. 1t. 5.5/1000 sq. Arenas, Theatres, 1/3 seats Assembly Halls Warehouses 1/2-1000 G.F.A. Section 8. Eden Prairie City Code, Section 11.03 entitled "Establishment of District, Special Requirements and Performance Standards" is hereby amended changing Subdivision 3, Paragraph H, Subparagraph 7, Item c to read as follows: Subd. 3 Special Requirements H. Off-Street Parking Facilities `- NEW 7. Connecting Parking Areas With Streets (a) Vehicular traffic generated by any use shall be channeled and )` controlled so as to avoid congestion and traffic hazards. ( ' (b) The adequacy of 4 Y any proposed Traffic control measures such as warning signs, directional signs, turn lanes, channelization, illumination, etc., may be required. (c) All driveways abutting public streets shall be subject to the following regulations: ® Minimum distance between driveways - 20 feet. Minimum driveway angle to street - 30 degrees for one via streets and 60 ega gees for two ;la streets. -—Driveway widths at street curb are: Drivveway Width Maximum Minimum Ufe 20 feet j2 feet lwo Ka/ If Tea feet Minimum Driveway Return Radius - 6 feet. Minimum Distances between the end of a driveway at the intersection of a Right-of-Way line and the Property'TTne sTiall-be ten feet.Section 9. Eden Prairie City Code, Section 11.03 entitled "Establisa nt of districts, Special Requirements and Performance Standards" is hereby amended changing Subdivision 3, Subparagraph K, to read as follows: Subd. 3 Special Requirements NEW K. Architectural Standards. All structures within all districts except Rural Rf-44, R1-22, R1-13.5, R1-9.Tr sand RM-6.5 shall be developed in accordance ith t following design n sfandaras:-— (1 Architectural Plans shall be re ared by a registered architect and include: 1 elevations of a 1 sides of the bull in • ) type and color oof exterior building materials) j a typica floor plan an imensions of aTT I structures; 4j location of trash containers, heating, air conditioning and' ventilation systems; 51 ppropos�- screening of trash containers, heating, W.conditioning and ventilation systems. (2) In districts N-Corn, C-Com, C-Reg, C-Reg-Ser, C-Hwy, Ofc and Pub, seventy-five percent, (75%), of the exterior uilding finish shall consist of materials co arable in rg ade and quality to the following: 1) face wick: 2) naturalstone• g ass. Di In districts I-2, I_5 and I-Gen, seventy-five ercent, (75%), of the exterior FA—Tiding finish shaT1 consistao material co arable in ra e and quality to the following::j face brick; J naturalstone; _ lass s eciall designed -precast concrete units if the suaces have been inte ral treat with an applied decorative materia'f or texture awn 'smoot concrete oc sc 1 ored--at least twice. — — (4) In all districts except Rural, R1-44, R1-22, R1-13.5, R1-9.5, and RM-6.5, wood, stucco,vinyl, metal, plastic or a combination r al T these materials, -sh lT not comprise more than twenty-five percent, (25l),—of a 5712ings exterior ii—sh. Section 10. Eden Prairie City Code, Section 11.10 entitled "Rural District" is hereby amended by changing Subdivision 2 to include new Paragraph F to read as follows: NEW Subd. 2 Permitted Uses A. Agriculture, accessory and related uses. B. Public facilities and Services. C. Single family detached dwellings and accessory structures without platting on parcels of not less than 10 acres. D. Single family detached dwellings and accessory structures without platting on parcels of five or more acres, but less than ten acres, as of July 6, 1982. E. Commercial stables. F. Golf Courses. Section 11. Eden Prairie City Code Section 11.20 entitled "Office District" is hereby amended by changing Subdivision 2, Paragraph B to read as follows: NEW Subd. 2 Permitted Uses. A. Business and professional offices and accessory uses. B. Supporting commercial sales and services to office users within large office structures of 100,000 square feet or more. The Commercial use isnot to exceed fifteen, (15%), o t/ he gross Floor Area ate. C. Publ is—facilities and services. Section 12. Eden Prairie City Code Section 11.25 entitled "Commercial Districts" is hereby amended by changing Subdivision 1, Paragraph A, Subparagraph 2 and Paragraph B, Subparagraph 2 to read as follows: NEW Subd. 1 Purposes. A. Special purposes of N-COM Neighborhood Commercial District. 1. To provide appropriately located areas for retail stores, office and personal service establishments partronized by residents of the immediate neighborhood area. 2. To permit development of neighborhood shops and related office uses which can—Ee accomodated in less than 50,000 square feet of retail- area a d a e in iiie appropriate locations shown on the Guide Plan, according to standar sbthat minimize adverse impact on adjoining residential uses. B. Special purposes of C-COM Community Commercial District. 1. To provide appropriately located areas for retail stores, offices, and personal service establishments patronized primarily by residents of the immediate community area. 2. To permit development of community sho pin centers and related office uses, which can be accomodated in less than 0,00 square feet of retail area, and are in the appropriate locations s�io wn on the Guide Plan, according to stan acdrds th t minimize adverse impact on adjoining resibential use. Section 13. Eden Prairie City Code Section 11.30 entitled "Industrial Districts" is hereby amended by changing Subdivision 2, Paragraph D to read as follows: ( NEW Subd. 2. Permitted Uses j:x�l • A. Manufacturing, warehousing, wholesale, distribution, pro- cessing, packaging, assembling, compounding, and accessory uses, conducted within structures except in I-GEN where uses maay include properly screened outside storage. B. Office uses. C. Public facilities and services. D. Supporting minor commercial uses as contained within office/industriaTbuildings, rovi icii—a supplemental function to the major office and/or industrial use. The commercia use is not to exceed 15%of the Gross Floor Area of the building it occupies. —E. gymnasium. Section 14. Eden Prairie City Code, Section 11.55 entitled "Mining Operation and Lana Alteration Regulations" is hereby amended by changing Suddivision 5, Paragraph A to include new Subparagraph 5 and by changing Sudivision 5, Paragraph C to include new Subparagraph 5 to read as follows: NEW Subd. 5. Application for Land Alteration Permit. A. Form of Application. Application for a permit shall be made in writing to the Council. The application shall set forth the location and plan for land alterations. The application shall also include: 1. The name and address of the person applying for the permit. 2. The name and address of the owner of land subject to the land alteration. 3. The estimated period of time within which the land alteration will be conducted. 4. A topographic map of the proposed area of the land alteration to a scale of one inch equals 100 feet and to a 2 foot contour interval. The map shall show: of 100 feet of adjacent land on all sides ofea saidsareapresently exists and a minimum (b) The propsed contours of the land when the land alteration is completed. appropriate for the land subject( (to the landing d a alteratdion,nage, and planting plan, if 5. The use to which the property shall be at after the land alteration is conpleted. — NEW Subd. 5. Application for land Alterations Permit. C. Council Action on a Land Alteration Permit Application. Within a reasonable time after receipt of an application that conforms with the requirements of this Subsivision and payment of the application fee, the Council shall approve or deny issuacne of a permit. The Council may approve the permit subject to conditions stated on the face of the permit, and in all cases, the time period within which the land alterations are to be completed shall be stated on the face of the permit. Approval, denial, or approval subject to conditions of a permit shall be based upon the following factors: 1. Whether, and the extent to which the land alterations may create any saftey risks to surrounding persons or property or exacerbate any existing risk. l�i) i :: 2. Whether, and the extent to which, the land alterations may cause any harm to the environment including, but not limited to noise, dust, ir erosion, undue destruction of vegetation, and accumulation of waste materials and pollutants. 3. Whether adequate plans have been made for restoring the site of the land alterations once the alterations have been completed. 4. Whether there is a substantial likelihood that the applicant will be able to comply with the rules and regulations of Subdivision 7 of this Section. 5. Whether the ro ert proposed for the Land Alteration is zoned for the use to which the property s a e uot after the La —Alter on is compleIET._--' — Section 15. Eden Prairie City Code, Section 11.65 entitled "Home Occupations" is hereby amended by changing Subdivision 1, Subparagraph C and D to read as follows: NEW Subd. 1. Required Conditions. It is unlawful to conduct a home occupation except in the R, R1-1 and RM Districts, and it is also unlawful to conduct a home occupation except in compliance with the following regulations: A. A home occupation shall be conducted in a dwelling and shall I be clearly incidental to the use of the structure as a dwelling. B. A home occupation shall not be conducted in an accessory structure and there shall be no stroage of equipment or supplies in an accessory structure or outside the dwelling. C. There shall be no external alteration of the dwelling in which a home occupation is cohducted, and the existence of a home slia1l not be ( apparent beyond the boundaries of the site, except for a name plate not to exceedT square foot. — —— —— D. This occupation shall be carried on or conducted only �by members of a family residing in the dwelling and no more t an one non-resident o5' E. No motor shall exceed one horse power. F. A home occupation shall not create any radio or television interference or create noise audible beyond the boundaries of the site. G. No smoke, odor, liquid, or solid waste shall be emitted. H. Not more than one truck of not more than 3/4 ton capacity and no semi-trailers incidental to the home occupation shall be kept on the site. I. A home occupation shall not create pedestrian, automoblie, or truck traffic significantly in excess of the normal amount in the district. Section 16. Eden Prairie City Code Section 11.70, Subdivision 2 is further amended by renumbering paragraphs 22 through 35 inclusive, as paragraphs 23 throgh 36. Section 17. Eden Prairie City Code Section 11.70, entitled "Sign Permits", is hereB amended by changing Subdivision 2 to include new Paragraph 22, to read as follows: NEW 22. "Sign Base" - The "Sign Base" of a si n shall be any supportive structure below or surrounding the sign area which has location on the ground. The sign base sTiall not exceed one 1 elf the maximum sign size permittedInn the zoninTaistrictt. j, Se ction toEAll Districts"Cisy hereby amendednbylchangingtSubdivisionr3, Cto include new Paragraph CC, to read as follows: Subd. 3. General Provisions Applicable to All Districts. A. Prohibitions NEW CC. A development must be 5 or more acres to support an Area Tdentification Sign. —— Se tion 19. General ProvisionscApplicafle to AllDistricts"airie Cisy hereby de changing Subdivisionn 11.70 t3ed to'Iinclude new Paragraph DO, to read as follows: Subd. 3. General Provisions Applicable to All Districts A. Prohibitions NEW DD. The sign base shall not exceed one half the maximum sign size permitted in tfie zoning district. Section 20. Eden Prairie City Code Section 11.70 entitled "Sign Permits" is hereby any 3n erfy changing Subdivision 4, Paragraph A, Subparagraph 7 and 8 to read as Subparagraph 8 and 9, and by including new Subparagraph 7 to read as follows: NEW Subd. 4. District Regulations. A. Single Family, R-1, and Multiple Residential Districts. 1. Identification Signs: One identification sign or symbol per building not greater than six square feet in area, provided such sign is attached flat against a wall of a building. 2. Area Identification Signs: One area identification sign per development, per street entrance, providing such sign does not exceed 24 square feet in area, and further provided, such sign is placed no closer than ten feet to any street right-of-way line. 3. Institutional Signs: One sign per street frontage identifying an institution or an institutional complex shall be permitted within a multiple residential district. Such sign shall not exceed 24 square feet in area nor shall it be placed closer than ten feet of any street right-of-way. uses to a multiple residential development shall notnbe v Ssible�dfromenfyin the outsidecofsory the building. 5. Temporary Signs: shall be permitted only as permitted in sudivision 3. 6. Maximum Height of Free-Standing Signs: Six feet. 7. Sign Base: (Refer to Subdivision 3 Subparagraph DD). r." Directional Signs: ZRefer to Subdivision 3 .S. Review Process: The signage program wiiTb e reviewed and approved lay the City Manager, or his designee. 1 • • Section 21. Eden Prairie City Code Section 11.70 entitled "Sign Permits" is hereby amended by changing Subdivision 4, Paragraph B to read as follows: Subdivision 4. District Regulations NEW B. Commercial Districts: N-COM, C-COM, C-REG-SER, C-HWY 1. Wall Signs: The total area of all wall signs on any wall of a building shall not exceed 15% of the wall area of that wall when said wall area does not exceed 500 square feet. When said surface area exceeds 500 square feet, then the total area of such wall sign shall not exceed 75 square feet plus 5% of the wall area in excess of 500 square feet, provided that the maximum sign area for any wall sign shall be 300 square feet. Wall area shall be computed individually for each tenant in a multi-tenant building based on the exterior wall area of the space that tenant occupies. 2. Free-standing Signs: One free-standing sign per street frontage is permitted. The total area of a free-standing sign for a buildina site-having one street fronts a sTa1T not exceed g0 square feet. Where a building sit has two or more street frontages, only one free-standing sign otthe above size E1-11-be"permittT Each permitted free-star-id-Trig sign in excess of one, sha have a sign area not to exceed 36 square feet. The maximum height o free-stan�nr signs shall eh-20---feet. No Tqn shal_�e placed closer than 20—feet to street FrgEl-of-way i4�1 ere parking occu within one-half the required— ront yard setback no sign shallhe placed rs closer than 15 feet to a street right-of-way. Te orar product sa el-,stamp and signs may occupy tTie remainder of the area not uti iz for the permanent sign, provided the total area of all permanenT`and tempomary signs h-7311 not exceed 80 sqaure feet for one sign and-50 square feet or each sign in excels-- one. _ — --'— 3. Area Identification Signs: One Sign per street frontage is allowed, provided the total area of any sign shall not exceed 80 square feet and a maximum height of 20 feet. (Refer to Subdivision 3, Paragraph CC). 4. Pump Signs: Lettering or symbols which are an integral part of the design of a gasoline pump and not mountedy above tine pump—body, shallbee permitted:— —' 5. Directional Signs: (Refer to Subdivision 3, Subpargraph N). 6. Temporary Signs: (Refer to Subdivision L. 7. Restroom Signs: Signs indicating the location of restrooms and containing no advertising information shall be permitted•` '- 8. Exceptions: Structures with 80% or more occu anc offices and medical anh dental clinics in a commercial-Par-ct shaTT comp y wit Paragraph E of this Su division. g. Sign Base: (Refer to Subdivision 3, Subparagraph OD). — 10. Review Process: In addition to specific require- ments set forth for each district the entire sign program must be reviewed and approcedTx the City Manager, or his designee. 7.)-) Section 22. Eden Prairie City code Section 11.70 entitled "Sign Permits" is hereby amended by deleting Paragraph D of Subdivision 4. Subdivision 4. District Regulations DELETE D. N-COM, C-COM, C-REG-SER, C-HWY Districts. 1. Wall Signs: The total area of all wall signs affixed to a building wall shall not exceed 15% of the total area of that wall. 2. Free-standing Signs: One free-standing sign per principal building per street frontage is permitted. The total area of a free- standing sign for a building site having one street frontage shall not exceed 80 square feet. Where a building site has two or more street frontages, only one free- standing sign of the above size shall be permitted. Each permitted free-standing sign in excess of one, shall have a sign area not to exceed 36 square feet. The maximum height of free-standing signs shall be 20 feet. Temporary product sale, stamp and game signs may occupy the remainder of that area not utilized for the permanent brand sign, providing the total area of all permanent and temporary signs shall not exceed 80 square feet for one sign and 50 square feet for each sign in excess of one. 3. Pump Signs: Lettering or symbols which are an integral part of the design of a gasoline pump and not mounted above the pump body, shall be permitted. 4. Directional Signs: (Refer to Subdivision 3). 5. Temporary Signs: (Refer to Subdivision 3). 6. Review Process: In addition to specific require- ments set forth for each district the entire sign program must be reviewed and approved by the City Manager, or his designee. 7. Restroom Signs: Signs indicating the location of restrooms and containing no advertising information shall be permitted. Section 23. Eden Prairie City Code Section 11.70 entitled "Sign Permits" is hereby amended by changing Subdivsion 4, Paragragh E, to read as follows: NEW Subd. 4. District Regulations. E. OFC District. 1. Identification signs: One free standing sign per building not to exceed 50 sqaure feet in area. Where such sign is located on a corner lot, one sign may be located on each street frontage provided the first does not exceed 50 square feet and the other permitted signs do not exceed 36 square feet. No sign shall be placed closer than then ten feet to any street right-of-way line. 2. Wall Signs: One identification sign per wall at: street frontage not exceed 50 square feet is permitted. One identification wall sign er accessory use attachedbuilding to the facing of the at the ground floor level is permitted. The area of the accessor sign shall not exceed-15% of the ground floor waTr a1 cT g of the accessory use an is shill—no case exceed—TO square feet. • 3. Area Identification Signs: One sign per development, not to exceed 50 square feet in area. ir4. Maximum Height of Free-standing Signs: Eight feet. 5. Temporary Signs: (Refer to Subdivision 3). 6. Directional Signs: (Refer to Subdivision 3, Subpara- graph N). 7. Sign Base: (Refer to Subdivision 3 Subparagraph DD . r Review Process: Tn addition to the specific requirements set forth for each district the ent;re sign program must-6e reviewed and approved Ethe Clty—Fianager, or hips assignee. Section 24. Eden Prairie City Code Section 11.70 entitled "Sign Permits" is amended by changing Subdivision 4, Paragraph F, by renumbering Subparagraphs 6 and 8 to Subparagraphs 7 and 9, and by including new Subparagraph 6, to read as follows: NEW Subd. 4. District Regulations. F. Industrial Districts. 1. Identification Signs: One identification sign per building, not to exceed 80 square feet in area. One additional wall identification sign for each tenant having a private exterior entry to a multi-tenant building; such sign being displayed at or near the tenent's entrance, and not to exceed 10% of the wall area that tenant occupies of the wall sign to which it is affixed, or a maximum of 51) square feet. No sign shall be placed closer than 10 feet to any street right-of-way line. 2. Area Idnetification Signs: One sign per development not to exceed 80 square feet in area. 3. Temporary Signs: (Refer to Subdivision 3). 4. Maximum Height of Free-standing Signs: Eight Feet 5. Directional Signs: (Refer to Subdivision 3, Subpara- graph N). 6. Sign Base: (Refer to Subdivision 3 Subparagraph CC). 7: All wa—Tl signs shall—be uniform in—design. /17 Aaadress signs m pT-a ed on rear door with 3 inch high numerals. 9. Review Process: In addition to specific requirements set forth for each district the entire sign program must be reviewed and approved la the City Managereror, his designee. Section 25. Eden Prairie City Code Section 11.70 entitled "Sign Permits" is hereby amended by changing Sudivision 4, Paragraph I, to include new Subparagraph 6, to read as follows: NEW Subd. 4. District Regulations. I. Public District. 1. Wall Signs: One sign per building not to exceed 24 square feet in area. Where a building is located on a corner lot, one sign may be ar located on each wall facing a street provided one does not exceed 24 square feet and the other does not exceed 18 square feet. All wall signs shall be uniform in design. Religious symbols shall not be considered part of the wall sign area. 2. Free-standing Signs: (a) One free-standing sign for each building, lot parcel, or tract of land may be erected on the lot, parcel, or tract of land it applies or on which any such building is situated. The maximum height of a free- standing sign shall be 8 feet and its total area shall not exceed 80 square feet. Religious symbols shall not be considered part ot the free-standing sign area. Where a building has two or more street frontages, only one free-standing sign of the ab;,,•e size shall be permitted and one additional free-standing sign shall be permitted not to exceed 35 square feet in size. (b) Off-site Directional Signs: Two additional church, school, or publicly owned land or building directional signs shall be permitted in locations other than the lot, parcel, or tract of land which it applies. Said signs shall be erected on non-public land, or if the sign is one owned by a public body such directional sign may be erected upon publicly owned property provided : (1) The maximum size of the sign shall not exceed 3 square feet. obtained. (2) The owner's permission must be (3) The sign shall be a minimum height of 4 feet, maximum height 6 feet. (4) Signs shall be uniform in design. 3. The signage program will be reviewed by the Director of ( Planning. 4. Temporary special event signs shall be permitted for a period not to exceed ten days. Such signs shall be no higher than 8 feet and not larger than 32 sqaure feet. 5. Directional signs to churches, schools, or publicly owned land or buildings in existence on the effective date ot this Section or amendments thereto, which do not conform to these regulations, shall be allowed to continue in use as provided in Section 11.75. 6. Sign Base: (Refer to Subdivision 2 Subparagraph CC). Section 26. Eden Prairie City Code Section 11.70 entitled "Sign Permits" is hereby amended by relettering Subdivision 4, Paragraphs E through J as Paragraphs D through I. Section 27. The City Zoning Map dated January 1987 and entitled "Zoning Map of the City of Eden Prairie" is hereby adopted. Section 28. Eden Prairie City Code Chapter 11 is hereby readopted in its entirety as amended herein. Section 29. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemenor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. f ( . Section 30. This ordinance shall become effective form and after passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , 1987, and finally read and adopted and ordered pubT'is`—fled at a regular meeting of the City Coucil of said City on the day of , 1987. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie New on the day of , 1987. -) Topview 5th Addition ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT This Addendum to Developer's Agreement made and entered into as of this day of , 1987, by and between Jerrold T. Miller and Mary Miller, husband and wife, hereinafter referred to as "Owners, and the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City;" WHEREAS, Developer and City made and entered into a Developer's Agreement, dated August 7, 1979 for Topview 4th Addition, (the "Developer's Agreement"); and, WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend said agreement..for a portion of the property referred to in said agreement, said portion of the property as described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof; NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties thereto as follows: 1. The Developer's Agreement shall be and hereby is supplemented and amended in the following respects: A. Paragraph 1. shall be amended to read as follows: Owner shall develop the property in conformance with the revised 1 material dated , 1987, reviewed and approved as amended 1 by the City Council on March 17, 1987, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. B. Paragraph 5. shall be deleted. 2. Owners agree to all of the terms and conditions and accept the obligations of the "Owner" under the Developer's Agreement, as amended and supplemented herein. " ,7 WHEREFORE, the parties hereto have executed this Addendum to Developer's Agreement the day and year first above written. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Gary D. Peterson, Mayor Carl J. Jullie, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1987, by Gary D. Peterson, the Mayor, and Carl J. 3ullie, the City Manager, of the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public i ;. OWNERS 9.. JERROLD T. MILLER MARY MILLER STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS. { , COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged by me this day of , 1987, by Jerrold T. Miller and Mary Miller, husband and wife. Notary Public 1 Exhibit A Legal Description Outlot A, Topview 4th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and, That part of the East 1/2 of the Northeast nuarter, Section 10, Township 116, Range 22, described as follows: Commencing at a point in the west line of the east 1/2 of the NE nuarter of said Section 10, distant 1640.1 feet north of the southwest corner of said tract, thence north along the west line of said tract a distance of 220 feet, thence east parallel with,the south line of the NE nuarter of said section a distance of 595.8 feet, more or less, to a point 699 feet west of the east line of said section 10 measured along a line parallel with the sduth line of the NE fluarter of said section, thence south parallel with the east line of said section a distance of 220 feet, thence west parallel with the south line of the NE flüartér of said section 597.5 feet more or less, to the point of beginning. • • Prairie View Center 2nd Addition C ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT This Addendum to Developer's Agreement made and entered into as of this day of , 1987, by and between Prairie View Associates, a Minnesota limited partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City;" WHEREAS, Developer and City made and entered into a Developer's Agreement, dated May 2, 1986 for Prairie View Center, (the "Developer's Agreement"); and, WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend said agreement for a portion of the property referred to in said agreement, said portion of the property as described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof; NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties thereto as follows: 1. The Developer's Agreement shall be and hereby is supplemented and amended in the following respects: A. Paragraph 1. shall be amended to read as follows: Owner shall develop the property in conformance with the revised material dated , 1987, reviewed and approved as amended by the City reto as Exhibit 6, subject ntolsuch changes on March 17and 98modifi cations�asheprovided herein. 2. Developer agrees to all of the terms and conditions and accept the obligations of the "Developer" under the Developer's Agreement, as amended and supplemented herein. 7-11 WHEREFORE, the parties hereto have executed this Addendum to Developer's Agreement the day and year first above written. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Gary D. Peterson, Mayor Carl J. Jullie, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1987, by Gary D. Peterson, the Mayor, and Carl J. Jullie, the City Manager, of the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public PRAIRIE VIEW ASSOCIATES MARK ROONEY, PARTNER STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged by me this day of , 1987, by Mark Rooney, Partner, Prairie View Associates, a Minnesota limited partnership, on behalf of the partnership. Notary Public c Exhibit A Legal Description for Prairie View Center 2nd Addition Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, PRAIRIE VIEW CENTER, Hennepin County, Minnesota t.i ii (,113 CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR IMI'ROVEMENT PROJECT 51-272 VALLEY VIEW ROAD, COUNTY ROAD 4 TO MITCHELL ROAD CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA • April, 1987 BENNETT-RINGROSE-WOLSFELD-JARVIS-GARDNER, INC. 700 Third Street South • Minneapolis, MN 55415 • The following work shall be added by contract amendment to this project. • ADDITIONS Estimated Unit Seq. No. Mn/DOT No. Item Unit Quantity Price Amount • 1/162/2451.501 Structure Excavation, C.Y.(EV) 1,128.00 $4.50 $5,076.00 Class "U" • TOTAL ADDITIONS, CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2 $5,076.00 • NECESSITY FOR AMENDMENT Item 1: Needed to excavate and remove variable soils from Golf Underpass roadway approaches in accordance with Mn/DOT Standard Plan Detail 5-297.226 (modified), to enable backfilling with granular soils and minimize frost heaving and dif- ferential settlement adjacent to the structure. ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $2,043,029.90 TOTAL PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMENDMENT ADDITIONS $ 77,011.25 SUBTOTAL 32,120,041.15 • TOTAL PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMENDMENT DEDUCTIONS $ 39 840.00 SUBTOTAL 3-2,080,201.15 TOTAL ADDITIONS, CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2 S 5,076.00 CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE $2,085,277.15 Page 1 of 2 CONTRACTOR !! Shafer Contracting Co., Inc. Title Date /-'i��. ENGINEER Bennett-Rfngrose-Wolsfeld-Jarvis-Gardner, Inc. 6.7t 1"�`� � 7. Title �-'l �Icr� 7 Date 9 � � CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE City Engineer Date L. Page 2 of 2 (J` • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 87-91 A RESDLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF WILLOW CREEK 3RD ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Willow Creek 3rd Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State.of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for Willow Creek 3rd Addition i.s approved upon compliance with the recoanendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated April 13, 1967, B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.30,Subd 10.4 waiving the ( requirement that 10 foot wide easements for utilities be centered on the side lot line as described in said engineering report. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon,compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on April 21, 1987. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL II John D. Frane, Clerk s:I l ? �u�,a CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 11/4 ENGINEERING REPORT ON PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works // FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician 1.11, .0, DATE: April 13, 1987 SUBJECT: WILLOW CREEK 3RD ADDITION PROPOSAL: Donald J. Sorenson has requested City Council approval of the preliminary and final plat of Willow Creek 3rd Addition, a replat of Willow Creek 2nd Addition. The site is located west of Bryant Lake Road and south of Willow Creek Road in the North half of Sections I1 and 12. The plat consists of five single family residential lots, each in excess of 40,000 square feet and three Outlets. Outlots A and B will be commonly owned by the owners of Lots 1, 2, 4 and 5 with development restrictions, having been recorded with the 2nd Addition. Ownership of Outlet C will be �• retained by the owner of Lot 3. The Developer has requested this replat to enable the construction of a walkway access to Outlots A and B along the common line of Lots 4 and 5. In order to meet minimum frontage requirements, the common line of Lots 2 and 4 will also be adjusted. The proposal also includes the addition of a part of Outlot A (from the 2nd Addition) to Lot 5 to allow the inclusion of a previously constructed tennis count to Lot 5. HISTORY: Zoning to R1-22 was finally read and approved by the City Council {` on December 1B, 1979, per Ordinance 79-42. The Developer's Agreement for Willow Creek Farm (aka Willow Creek 2nd Addition) was executed on December 18, 1979, and shall apply to this plat. An ammendment to this agreement is scheduled for City Council review and execution on April 21, 19B7. The Developer has requested vacation of underlying easements from Willow Creek 2nd Addition. A public hearing to consider the vacation request is scheduled for ;lay 5, 1987. All vacated easements will be replaced with revised easements through this platting. VARIANCES: A variance from the requirements of City Code 12.30, Subd 10.A waiving the requirement that 10 feet wide drainage and utility easements be centered on side lot lines will be necessary. This ( variance applies to the easement along the property line between Lots 4 and 5 and has been requested to enable the Developer to place an access walkway to Outlots A and B avoiding existing trees. 1 -(Lt C Page 2 WILLOW CREEK 3RD ADDITION APRIL 13, 1987 Variance 83-16, approved by the Board of Appeals on June 10, 1983, addresses setback variances allowed for the construction of a tennis court on part of Outlot A (2nd Addition). This part of Outlot A is now being included in Lot 5 and all variances previously allowed are sufficient. All other variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal sanitary sewer and watermain will not be installed at this time. Future costs for the installation of these utilities will be assessed to the benefitted properties. Roadway improvements necessary to serve this site have been installed by the Developer. Walkways to be installed will be privately owned and maintained and were not required by the City. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement and shall conform to City Code standards. BONDING: Bonding shall conform to City Code requirements. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the preliminary and final plat of Willow Creek 3rd Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: 1. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $250.00. cc: Donald J. Sorenson (1040 First Bank Place West 120 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-1892) Ron Krueger Planning Department a ��IC 'l CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 87-94 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF EDENVALE 21ST ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Edenvale 21st Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for Edenvale 21st Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated April 14, 1987. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified-copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on April 21, 1987. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk { .fug CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician DATE: April 14, 1987 (�JI SUBJECT: EDENVALE 21ST ADDITION • PROPOSAL: The Developer, Breco Corporation, has requested City Council approval of the Final Plat of Edenvale 21st Addition located south of Edenvale Blvd. and west of Woodland drive in the South half of Section 4. The site contains 7.36 acres to be divided into 18 single family lots, one Outlot, and right-of-way dedication for street purposes. Outlot A is a cattail wetland containing 1.84 acres and is to be dedicated to the City. This plat is a replat of Outlot R of Edenvale 3rd Addition. HISTORY: The Preliminary Plat was approved by the City Council February 17, 1987, per Resolution 87-46. Second reading of Ordinance 7-87, changing zoning from rural to R1-9.5, was finally read and approved at the City Council meeting held March 17, 1987. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities and streets will be installed in conformance with City Standards and the requirements of the Developer's Agreement. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the I` Developer's Agreement. BONDING: Bonding will conform to City Code and the Developer's Agreement. 1 FJ PAGE 2 EDENVALE 21ST ADDITION APRIL 14, 1987 RECOMMENOATION: Recommend approval of the Final Plat of Edenvale 21st Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement, and the following: 1. Receipt of street sign fee of $374.00. 2. Receipt street lighting fee of $2,150.00. 3. Receipt of engineering fee of $720.00. 4. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. • 5. Receipt of warranty deed for Outlot A. `` cc: Breco Corporation Hanson, Thorp, Pellinen, 8 Olson, Inc. 2 BSI CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 87-96 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF TOPVIEW ACRES 5TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Topview Acres 5th Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for Topview Acres 5th Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated April I4, 1987. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat• C. That the Mayor and City tanager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on April 21, 1967. Gary D. Peterson, tlayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works ' FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician, •' DATE: April 14, 1987 v� SUBJECT: TOPVIEW ACRES 5TH ADDITION PROPOSAL: The Developers, Jerrold T. and Cris Miller, have requested City Council approval of the Final Plat of Topview Acres 5th Addition, a single family residential subdivision located west of Gerard Drive and north of Beehive Court in the North half of Section 10. The plat contains 3.72 acres to be divided into six single family lots and one Outlot. Outlot A contains 0.97 acres ownership of which is to be retained by the Developers for future development. The plat is a replat of Outlot A Topview Acres 4th Addition and an additional area north of Outlot A. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council March 17, 1987, per Resolution 87-74. Second reading of Ordinance 79-18, changing zoning from rural to R1-13.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council August 9, 1979. The Developer's Agreement referred to wihin this report was executed August 2, 1979. An amendment to said agreement is scheduled for execution at the April 21, 1987 City Council meeting. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities and streets have been installed to serve the site; however, a water service must be provided to serve Lot 6. The Developer shall be responsible for the installation costs and the restoration costs incurred in providing water service to Lot 6. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. BONDING: Bonding will conform to City Code and the Developer's Agreement. 1 1J3 • PAGE 2 TOPVIEW ACRES 5TH ADDITION APRIL 14, 1987 RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the Final Plat of Topview Acres 5th Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: 1. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $250.00. 2. Execution of amendment to Developer's Agreement. 3. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. cc: Jerrold T. 8 Cris Miller Ron Krueger 8 Assoc. U�`1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESDLUTION NO. 87-97 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF MEADOW PARK 3RD ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Meadow Park 3rd Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Mat approval request for Meadow Park 3rd Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated April 14, 1987. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City tanager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on April 21, 1987. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor L. ATTEST: SEAL John D. i°rane, City Clerk — —i�-- 1 715 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician DATE: April 14, 1987 SUBJECT: MEADOW PARK 3RD ADDITION PROPOSAL: JB and D, Incorporated has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Meadow Park 3rd Addition located north of Sunnybrook Road and west of Homeward Hills Road in the South 1/2 of Section 23. The site contains 31.5 acres to be divided into 24 single family residential lots and one Outlot (18.0 acres). Outlot A is to be dedicated to the City prior to release of the plat. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on December 2, 1986 per Resolution 86-293. Zoning to R1-13.5 was finally read and approved by the City Council on January 20, 1987 per Ordinance 58-86'. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed on January 20, 1987. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal utilities, streets and walkways will be installed throughout this site in conformance with City Standards. Acceptabale street names were not submitted with this plat request. Proposed street names must be submitted to and accepted by the Oirector of Public Works and placed on the Final Plat prior to release of the plat. Additional right-of-way must be provided, in a manner acceptable to the Director of Public Works, for the complete roadway located in the northwesterly portion of the platted area. The necessary right-of- way must be provided through a deed or easement prior to release of the plat. PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication shall conform to City Code requirements. BONDING: 5onding shall conform to City Code requirements. 1 / PAGE 2 MEADOW PARK 3RD ADDITION APRIL 14, 1987 • RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the Final Plat of Meadow Park 3rd Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: 1. Receipt of fee for street name signs in the amount of $624.00. 2. Receipt of fee for control signs in the amount of $265.00. 3. Receipt of streetlighting fee in the amount of $4,095.00. 4. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $960.00. 5. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. 6. Receipt of acceptable street names and inclusion on the final plat. 7. Receipt of recordable document to cover additional right-of-way needs. 8. Receipt of Warranty Deed for Outlot H. cc: Don Faulks Harold Peterson �. 2 75 HERBST & THEE. LTD. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 980 NORTHLAND PLAZA 3800 WEST 8O'1. STREET ADRIAN E.REFFST LEGAL.ASSISTANT-CATV DANIEL D.THUE. BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55.1;71 ANN M.MATHEWS GARY R.MATz TELEPHONE(612)893-0711 Tom TOOAs ._ REESE E.CHEER'S TELECOPT ER DIANE M.SCHMIDT (612)893-6991 April 6, 1987 Carl Jullie, Chairman Craig Rapp City Manager City Manager City of Eden Prairie City of Hopkins 8950 Eden Prairie Road 1010 South First Street Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 Jim Prosser Ken Rosland City Manager City Manager City of Richfield City of Edina 6700 Portland Avenue 4801 West 50 Street Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Edina, Minnesota 55424 James F. Miller City Manager City of Minnetonka 14600 Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 RE: Our File No. 86-0024G Gentlemen: Enclosed is the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission's (SWSCC) Annual Report for 1986 adopted at the Full Commission meeting on April 1, 1987. The summary of achievements for the past year and a listing of goals for 1987 will provide your cities with a record of the activities of the Commission. The SWSCC has issued a press release to local newspapers advising them of the annual meeting and availability of the annual report by contacting the city hall of any member city. You might also include the report on your city council meeting's agenda as a point of information. In so doing, we will keep the lines of communication open which leads to effective representation. Thank you for your assistance. Please contact me should you have any questions or concerns. Very truly yours, Adrian E. Herbst { AEH:g Enclosures April 1, 1987 To Member Cities: The Southwest Suburban Cable Commission (SWSCC) has prepared its first annual review of performance and projections for the year ahead in the format of "The SWSCC Annual Report for 1986". The attached report provides you with an update of our activities and solidifies our commitment to representation and communication to the cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield as provided for under the Joint Powers Agreement. The past year provided many challenges for the Commission as it addressed such subjects as a transfer in controlling interest, refinancing of the cable company, channel realignment and access programming. The Commission proved its commitment to effective administration of the franchise through continued discussion and negotiation with Rogers Cablesystems, Inc. The Commission continued to monitor the company's performance in marketing and customer responsiveness through review of monthly reports and ongoing meetings with company officials. The Commission, in the spirit of its inception, provided a forum for discussion on cable related matters by citizens, community groups and educational representatives. We look to 1987 as a continuation of our effort to i effectively represent the Member Cities on cable matters and to provide the citizens with quality cable television service. In 1987, the Commission plans to address the promotion and development of access programming and to review the needs of the Institutional Network. The Southwest Suburban Cities' support of the Commission during 1986 was instrumental to its operation and is looked to in 1987 to assure another successful year of the SWSCC. Very truly yours, '- 111;c, )LC 0�"L . l-c Wayne C. ourtney Chairper on of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission COMMISSION MEMBERS Wayne C. Courtney, Mayor City of Edina Kenneth Rosland, City Manager City of Edina Craig Rapp, City Manager City of Hopkins Robert Anderson, Councilmember City of Hopkins John Hamilton, Mayor City of Richfield Jim Prosser, City Manager City of Richfield James F. Miller, City Manager City of Minnetonka Karen Anderson, Councilmember City of Minnetonka Carl Jullie, City Manager City of Eden Prairie George Bentley, Councilmember City of Eden Prairie Adrian E. Herbst Attorney/Administrator f. :I ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION 1986 Achievements The Southwest Suburban Cable Commission (SWSCC) provided effective oversight of the cable company and response to numerous community concerns in the interest of the Member Cities including: Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield during the calendar year 1986 to ensure successful operation of the cable system in the communities. The following information summarizes the accomplishments made by the SWSCC through the ongoing efforts of the Member Cities, Full Commission and Operating Committee. I. Information Resource A. Kept abreast of legislation and regulatory matters so as to serve as a knowledgeable resource to Member Cities on cable television matters. II. Consumer Services A. Worked with the company to ensure that the cable system, services and programming available to Member Cities and its citizens are of the highest quality. III. Performance Agreement Follow-up A. In the spirit of the Performance Agreement of the Relief Package, the SWSCC continued to review, with the company, approaches to create an economically viable and profitable business. IV. Access Programming A. Approval and institution of Access Rules which serve to clarify such issues as use and accessibility of equipment and facilities. The rules establish guidelines so that only non-commercial programs are produced and establish procedures for reprimanding abusers of the access privileges. B. Provision of Access Handbooks to all access producers. The handbooks provide the Access Rules as well as information pertaining to government, public, educational and leased access. The handbook will serve as an educational as well as a promotional tool. - 1 - (JlI C. Promotion of Access by Rogers was monitored so as to be in compliance with terms of the Performance Agreement. Individual cities made available access information in city newsletters as well as making the Access Handbook available at the City Halls. City representatives, in conjunction with the company, produced video spots on the system stating support of public access and the annual Teddy Awards ceremony. Each City passed a resolution proclaiming "cable television access week" during the week of the awards ceremony. D. An Access Review was begun in compliance with conditions of the Performance Agreement. The Commission conducted the first annual survey of community producers obtaining their responses to issues such as training, equipment availability and future needs for access. The Commission also reviewed company's report on access budget, services provided, needs for 1987 and comparison information on other metro area systems. Administrator met with the Educational Cable Coordinating Committee and various school officials in the access area. The Commission also toured the NW Suburban Access facilities as part of their ongoing review of access. V. Oversight of the Company A. Monthly reports from the company were provided and reviewed so as to monitor subscriber statistics, constituent complaints and access usage. The subscriber statistic report format was adjusted so as to show previous year statistics for comparison purposes. Oversight through monthly reports allowed the Commission to stay on top of consumer concerns and operation of the company. B. Annual Business Plan of the company was reviewed by the Commission. The Commission is better able to monitor company performance by understanding company direction as outlined in the plan. C. Mediation on consumer concerns with the company served to resolve the majority of complaints including billing, installation and construction concerns. VI. Institutional Network I A. Development of the study group, SWING, was delayed due to lack of demand and recent financial relief given to the company. Interested groups were I' - 2 - (b ( informed of the delay and were provided with the opportunity to respond. B. Ongoing consideration was given to the application of the Institutional Network. The Administrator met with interested school officials and the Operating Committee toured an established Institutional Network in South Washington County as part of their research. VII. Negotiations with Company A. Transfer of ownership and controlling interest and refinancing of Rogers Southwest company was reviewed and accepted providing a stronger financial base for the company's operation. The Commission conducted a public hearing and careful monitoring of the company's technical and financial operation. A resolution of acceptance was passed by each Member City. B. Channel realignment proposal by the company was negotiated and accepted. The Commission agreed to the company moving the access channels higher in the channel lineup, if the Commission's requests to group the access channels, to extend availability of Universal Service for one year ( pending further consideration and to bear the cost of the implementation of the channel realignment were met. An agreement was reached and a resolution passed. VIIi. Operation of SWSCC A. Administration of the SWSCC conducted by Herbst & Thue, Ltd. All budgetary and financial obligations of the SWSCC were monitored and fulfilled. Goals In review of the many and diverse accomplishments of the SWSCC during 1986, the following goals have been set forth for achievement by the SWSCC during the year ahead. } 1. To continue to act as a resource to Member Cities on legislative and regulatory matters relative to cable television. 2. To continue the cooperative effort with the cable 1 company to provide quality cable service and programming services to the citizens of the Southwest Suburban Communities. 1 - 3 - ggs ( 3. To look for new approaches to improve the economic viability of the cable system so that the company continues to service the communities with quality cable television.service. 4. To provide continued review of the company's response to access needs and obligations in the Southwest Suburban Communities. This shall include consideration of an access committee to act as advisors to the SWSCC, additional reporting by the company and/or comprehensive access review. 5. To consider further the needs and application of the Institutional Network in the Southwest Suburban Communities. This shall include consideration and decision on the implementation of the SWING study group. 6. To provide for open communications between city officials and community groups concerning cable television. This shall include a joint meeting with school representatives, monitoring: library use of access channels. 7. To complete extension of the franchise term as provided for in the Relief Agreement which shall include filing with the Department of Commerce. 8. To promote ongoing effective communication with the cable company through meetings, correspondence and appropriate reporting. 9. To develop image of the Commission in communities:.it serves through public notices, articles in area newspapers and city newsletters. 10. To continue to serve constituents with forum for l complaint resolution and for address of suggestions relating to cable television. 11. To operate within budget barring any unforeseen circumstances. 4 - CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTIDN #87-86 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BLOSSOM RIDGE ADDITION FOR G.W. PEARSON BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Blossom Ridge Addition for G.W. Pearson, dated February 20, 1987, consisting of 3.1 acres into four single family lots and one outlot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on. the 21st day of April, 1987. • Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: March 20, 1987 PROJECT: Blossom Ridge Addition LOCATION: South of Blossom Road, east of Sennett Place APPLICANT: G. William Pearson FEE OWNERS: G. William Pearson and Harold Johnson REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5. 2. Preliminary Plat of 3.1 acres into four single family lots, one outlot, and road right-of-way. Background I V)::,,, . �,.o sr.41,,,.. �� 'This site is currently designated on ��" ` ���jj ` _•the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide ems,/ (1111111 ��, :''Plan for Low Density Residentiai v/ �' ••• land uses. Surrounding designations T � ` to the east, west, and south, are a :�), plek111111� ' :�also guided for Low Density ---� `-22 `Residential. Property to the north, —" .� .. ='{,. Lutheran Church has been designated . \, �1 _ ;. 6 for Public land use. Specific land �b' - uses in this area include Eden ,/' oivEYli Prairie Acres, zoned R1-22 to the " •PROPOSED SITE �-° east and south; the J & L 7 t5i111 �, ,..• Lam+ eti Subdivision, zoned R1-13.5 to the „ f rA „,P"t. west; and, the proposed Prairie v. Lutheran Church to the north. The '�; III 5} 107-84 ' proponent is requesting a zoning ��RI-13.5 �,,�" RI-13.5" district change from R1-22 to R1- o-, �� C311111M iq ,,,,, �.IIMIIIIME 'r 13.5 to allow for the development of ,,,,,moo ,'��.� �i, �. four single-family lots. ; , �i VV.,f .,e Site Plan/Preliminary Plat 11 The site plan depicts the division ,,,,;0t;_Ac, '. /al'`,1 0 6' ' ;*• of a 3.1-acre tract of land into • �� four single family lots and one �' g �ac ;19" iF AREA LOCATION MAP / • Blossom Ridge Addition 2 March 20, 1987 outlot. All of the lots meet the minimum requirements of the R1-13.5 zoning district with the exception of Lot 1 which requires 100 feet of lot frontage on a corner lot. The plan shall be revised to reflect the additional 2.5 feet prior to Council review. Lot sizes within the subdivision range from a minimum of 13,525 square feet to a maximum of 19,729 square feet. Access to this site will be provided by a cul-de-sac off Blossom Road. This access point location is consistent with the overall plan; however, a cul-de-sac is not required in this location. Based upon the grading plan submitted by the proponent, it appears that the proposed cul-de-sac could be extended to the east with a connection made to a proposed cul- de-sac on the overall plan. Staff would recommend that the proponent revise the plans to reflect a road extension to the eastern property line of the subject property. (See Attachment A). Grading. Elevations on this site range from a high point of 878 within the center portion of the site, to a low point of 850 in the extreme southeast corner. The proposed grading plan shows a cut of three feet occuring in the center of the site along the proposed roadway and a fill of approximately ten feet for the location of a building pad on Lot 4. The grading plan shall be revised to reflect the proposed road extension. The submitted tree inventory depicts a total of approximately 142 caliper inches of oak and ash trees which will be removed due to the construction on Lot 4. Staff would recommend that the proponent provide a tree replacement plan for 142 caliper inches of trees which will be required prior to Council review. Utilities Water and sanitary sewer service is available to this site through connections made in the proposed Blossom Ridge cul-de-sac with an extension into Blossom Road. No storm drainage system has been designed for this project; however, an overall storm drainage design has been included as part of the feasibility study for the construction of Blossom Ridge and Blossom Road. (See Attachment B). The proponent will be required to revise his plans to reflect a storm drainage system within proposed Blossom Ridge with a connection made to the proposed system within Blossom Road. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS {{. Staff would recommend approval of the request for a Zoning District Change from R1- 22 to R1-13.5 and the Preliminary Plat of approximately 3.1 acres into four lots, one outlot, and road right-of-way, based on plans dated February 20, 1987, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 20, 1987, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: A. Submit a revised plan which depicts the extension of Blossom Ridge to the most easterly property line of the proposed subdivision. B. Provide a tree replacement plan which depicts a total of 142 caliper inches of tree replacement. Blossom Ridge Addition 3 March 20, 1987 C. Submit a revised plan which reflects an overall storm drainage plan. D. Submit a revised plan which reflects the minimum lot frontage for a corner lot for Lot 1. 2. Prior to Final plat, proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water run-off, erosion control, and utility plans for review by the City Engineer. B. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. 3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Pay the appropriate. Cash Park Fee. 4. Prior to Grading permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance. of grading. Stake all grading limits with a snow fence. Any trees lost outside the limits shall be replaced on an area inch per area inch basis. (6 i B�cseo�, Foaot\' r —13 i r _ W I, , it I II I 1 - - - �. I I 3 _ 1: S I ia7:, I. i `• -- I 1 Q ,,I� --—— , I �. .I----�— 1 7 4 I• , b,. I I i I i - .I , � 1 i G '- I _ ,�,'. ''_ — —---- ICI' 1 1 �; ( • r 1 z I 1. , • i' j I ATTACHMENT A I PROPOSED STREET EXTENSION 76cb / \ / \ N F /A/ I R 4 / LL istl3 dame --'--I L / �- � '-//m\ '0 I _ - \ 0:W _ // T di O11tlONZ rm I �H --\/ 7 7\ •,[tS,)n) / - T\„o ---1F-__� , "/ m rNe< m / Noe_ a z In Lttl3) N sddm¢ i - _e *1.—.L_ / �'�. / o di.ea Ir J °s 1 m / /ri 6-,o 0. - e lollno` \ - I ' I ^ ' ' 3 �'3) lollno 1.// T.h Ou0 `LJ.—LJ L---------_� a;a I ONO-It-al-all-fa I 1 —30�M11 ' ----_._.i'' Nnsllnvr o m m I = 1 1 0 lollno V 1-1 1000-a-33-III-IIa W I e000-0-ta•so-aa .J I I' acoo- as-sn-a w il 1000•t[-�MI.93 I I Sal to dJ O ow O. _ 2 Ir e N U I, ti 0 K i I _'/ a 1 9 _"4.4 F i = ( S3 d p- 1A de. O e- o u O u c Wae 0 n I ► two•m-tt-au-aa Z He0g � o _ u . n V. _ ± -1,e, ¢ W 1_ u « « : A Ncf I I < W O i m «A09-•.I ..- [eoo-043-HI-a 6 W it I$ I:I 1O X °_t - I.I W z = $ 0 ; 2 "alp « 1I 0 az 0 .«, 2 0 0 3 ne-e.ea 'H- n-3a.w•af W OL m « a II W n 1 pHy� hpp - I —�oN b r - —-----_-_ ( -1 ---i WossOle v ----- I //` AaMovon -. p // �-`... I v / $ bob L---,•_11_uT_oa ' ppy goy / _ _ _ e w_ - --'3n1a0 3oala»336o H16 "IH n ,:a 1 S))rH r / °o, 1 1 H; I « 9 « 0,1 1jp I De 's F 1' ATTACHMENT B j i 9. 7(ac) 1EPlanning Commission Minutes 2 March 23, 1987 A. BLOSSOM RIDGE ADDITION, by G. W. Pearson. Request for Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 1.7 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 3.1 acres into four single family lots and one outlot. Location: South of Blossom Road, east of Bennett Place. A public hearing. Mr. G. W. Pearson, proponent, reviewed the proposed development with the Commission. He stated that it was basically a request for a small subdivision. Planner Uram reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report of March 20,1987, regarding the development. He noted that the Staff had designed the overall road system for this area at the time of review of the J & L Subdivision, recently approved by the City. Planner Uram stated that the proposed plan was in general conformance with the Staff design. Other than standard recommendations regarding streets, sewer, water, and park dedication fees, Planner Uram noted that the Staff Report also contained recommendations regarding extension of the street, tree replacement, storm water drainage, and the minimum lot frontage for Lot 1 of the proposed subdivision. Chairman Schuck asked for comments, or questions, from members of the audience. There were none. MDTION 1: '. Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Dodge, to close the public hearing. Motion carried--7-D-D MOTIDN 2: Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Fell, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of G. W. Pearson for Zoning District Change from R1- 22 to R1-13.5, for 1.7 acres for the Blossom Ridge Addition, based on plans dated February 20, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 20, 1987. Motion carried--7-0-D '10 CPlanning Commission Minutes 3 March 23, 1987 MOTION 3: IMotion was made by Bye, seconded by Fell, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of G. W. Pearson for Preliminary Plat of 3.1 acres - into four single fmaily lots and one outlot for the Blossom Ridge Addition, based on plans dated February 20, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 20, 1987. Motion carried--7-0-0 1 ! CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE r HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA l RESOLUTION NO. 87-87 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Plan has bean submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and, WHEREAS, the proposal of Countryside Investments, Inc. for devel p7ont of Cardinal Creek Ridge for Low Density Residentiai use requires the amendment of the Plan; NDW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: approximately 23.1 acres located east of Baker Road and Edenvaie Boulevard, west of 1-494 be modified from 'ediumiDensity Residential to Low Density Residential. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 21st day of April, 1987. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John 0. Frane, City Clerk- _ T� ., CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #87-88 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF CARDINAL CREEK RIDGE FOR COUNTRYSIDE INVESTMENTS, INC. WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for. the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Cardinal Creek Ridge PUO Development by Countryside Investments, Inc., and`. considered their request for approval for development (and variances) and. recoirunended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on April 21, 1987; NOW, THEREFORE, BY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Cardinal Creek, Ridge by Countryside Investments, Inc., being in ' Hennepin County, Minnesota, is legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Development approval as outlined in the plans, as revised, dated March 6, 1987. 3. That the PUD Development meet the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated March 23, 1987. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 21st day of April, 1987. Gary 0. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frame, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #87-89 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CARDINAL CREEK RIDGE FOR COUNTRYSIDE INVESTMENTS, INC. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Cardinal Creek Ridge for Countryside Investments, Inc., dated April 1, 1987, consisting of 23.1 acres into 37, single family lots and road right-of-way, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council "on the 21st day of April, 1987. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • STAFF REPORT C TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner HR UGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: March 20, 1987 PROJECT: Cardinal Creek Ridge LOCATION: West of Interstate I-494, east of Baker Road, opposite the intersection of Edenvale Boulevard APPLICANT: Countryside Investments FEE OWNERS: Harold Griffiths, Oscar Miller, Frank Kramer, and Richard and Evelyn Holasek REQUEST: 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential on 23.1 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development Concept Review for 40 single family lots on 23.10 acres. 3. Planned Unit Development District Review with variances for front yard setback on 23.10 acres. 4. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 23.10 acres. 5. Preliminary Plat of 23.10 acres into 40 single family lots. V f" 13(„8 3 J ',�+ �� -COM ,:�,II (( I Background •�,t-2 • PUe 1 \PRK Lle The Comprehensive Guide Plan des11111 - ignates this site as a Medium f C=' ' Density land use. Surrounding land ` -82 %�j♦.444.4♦, I uses are guided Low Densit of RI1 RM • - ►♦♦♦�1Q"►♦ Resident ial to the south, Medium ry ••♦♦♦4���1���f Density Residential to the west, ♦♦ ♦♦�y♦� PROPOSED SITE �♦♦♦�♦i'��'� \\ Community Commercial to the north, , i. q �1�♦•�'+4 and Open Space and road right-of-way323 ,♦♦♦�`, to the east. : ;� PUB • �♦�♦�♦�♦j� \\ S• " F �°i ♦••♦♦•• \ The Guide Plan depicts Medium _ 4;:w ' !e. �.. Density housing on this site and ` w.• clustering of housing could provide . ' s , the opportunity to preserve more of , ` PUB �� - 1 the existing natural site character- sit 29-83 istics includingthe ,�,,' R1-13 pond, steep ` .J, •* RI 135 slopes, and oak trees in their ,ago.. / ,i--7144 AM-4.vi i �[�' W. natural state. �m;�:—. «� (7:. AREA LOCATION MAP 1 Cardinal Creek Ridge 2 March 20, 1987 Preliminary Plat The Preliminary Plat depicts the subdivision of 23.10 acres into 40 single family lots at a density of 1.5 units per acre. The average lot size is 22,800 square feet. Front yard setback variances are requested on all lots from 30 to 25 feet in order to save more of the oak trees. The variance should be limited to Lots 1-8 and Lots 11-28 along the ridge line where the majority of oak trees are located. Lot 32, Block 1, does not meet the minimum street frontage requirement of 55 feet on a cul-de-sac. To eliminate the variance, the cul-de-sac should be extended such that Lots 31 and 32 would both meet the minimum 55-foot requirement. Lots 24 and 25 do not meet the average width requirement of 85 feet. Lot 25 is 5 feet short of the Ordinance, and Lot 24 is 2 feet short of the Ordinance. Since the street frontages are large along the roadway, it is possible to adjust the lot lines and eliminate the need for the variances. Access The access from Baker Road, which serves this site and the proposed Cardinal Hills subdivision to the east, has good sight vision distance and has been approved by the County. The two cul-de-sacs which have access onto Baker Road are located on the inside of a curve and sight vision distance in both directions is poor. The County has reviewed this and has recommended the developer not complete the intersection of the two streets with Baker Road until Baker Road is upgraded. The time frame for Baker Road upgrading is late this fall. Grading Extensive cuts are proposed along the cul-de-sac serving Lots 1-28. At the end of the cul-de-sac a cut of 22 feet is proposed off the top of the knoll in order to accommodate the proposed street grades and lotting pattern. The location of the roadway and building pad development will result in extensive tree loss. Proposed houses on Lots 31 and 36 are below the elevation of the street. Proposed grading directs water towards the household. Grading will have to be revised to show how the water will be channelled by a Swale around the buildings and towards the ponding area. Proposed street grading is below the 8% maximum allowed by City Code. A level landing pad not to exceed 2% in grade should be provided at the intersection of the two cul-de-sacs. Driveway grades on proposed Lots 31, 33, 34, 35, and 37, are steep and must be revised to not exceed a maximum of 12 ,X. No grading plan is shown proposed on Lot 32. Prior to Council review, a grading plan must be submitted which shows the location of proposed driveway and grading around the proposed pad locations. In addition, a detailed tree inventory will be required within the proposed construction limits to evaluate the extent of tree loss with any trees loss subject to tree replacement. Grading is proposed off-site on the Holasek property to the north. Permission from the adjoining land owner will be necessary not only for the grading of the roadway, but also for the dedication of land area for road right-of-way purposes. Cardinal Creek Ridge 3 March 20, 1987 In order to save trees on the property, the proponents are asking for a front yard setback variance to 25 feet. The granting of the setback variance under the PUD District Review should be predicated upon that building development be limited to the depth of the building pads as shown on the proposed grading plan. In other words, it will do no good to vary the front yard setback to preserve trees if a larger house is built on the lot than shown. The grading limits should be staked with a snow fence and should not be removed on any lot until an occupancy permit has been issued and if it is determined that the site has been graded in accordance with the approved plan. In order to reduce grading on Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, and 12 where tree coverage is heavy, additional block and exposed foundation is proposed to match the existing grade. In order to assure compliance with the grading plan the proponent should prepare restrictive covenants for each of these lots which limits the grading to the approved plan and requires the use of block, in place of additional fill. Tree Replacement The tree inventory indicates a total of 11,352 caliper inches of primarily oak trees greater than 12 inches in diameter. No trees under that size were inventoried. The proponents have indicated that a total of 3,345 inches of trees, or 29% of the total caliper inches, would be removed due to construction. According to the tree replacement policy 1,687 caliper inches or 50% of these removed must be replaced. Many of the trees that are proposed to be saved will not live for a very long time period since the proposed building pads and proposed grading falls within the drip lines of the trees. An additional 440 inches of oak trees may die because of construction practices and should be subject to tree replacement. This would mean that the total caliper inches of tree loss on the property would be 3,788 inches, or 33% of the total tree coverage. The tree replacement plan would require 2,128 caliper inches of trees. The developer should be required to bond for the additional caliper inches that may be lost after construction. If it is determined after the annual site inspection of the tree replacement plan by Staff, that any of these trees are saved or are expected to survive, then credit shall be given for those trees. If not, those trees would be subject to tree replacement. Utilities Sewer and water service is available immediately adjacent to the site by connection to facilities in Baker Road and by connection to the Cardinal Creek neighborhood to the south. Storm water run-off from the ends of the two easterly cul-de-sacs will be directed towards the pond in the central portion of the site. This pond does not have an outlet. The proponent should provide storm water run-off calculations and pond holding capacity calculations for review by the City Engineer. Adjoining Land Uses The adjoining property to the north is guided Community Commercial. No transition has been provided for on this development plan between the existing single family homes and future Community Commercial uses on the north side of the property. Cardinal Creek Ridge 4 March 20, 1987 STAFF RECOMlENDATIONS The Staff would recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential, Planned Unit Development Concept Review, Planned Unit Development District Review, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5, and Preliminary Plat of 23.1D acres into 40 single family lots, based upon the Staff Report, dated March 20, 1987, and plans dated, March 4, 1987, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council review, proponent shall: A. Revise the preliminary plat to extend the cul-de-sac on Lots 31 and 32. B. Revise the grading plans for Lots 31, 33, 34, 35, & 37, to a maximum of 12 grade for driveways. Show grading on Lot 32 for driveway and house pad location. C. Modify the road slopes at the intersection of two cul-de-sacs to not exceed 2% for the first 50 feet. D. Provide storm water run-off calculations and pond holding capacity calculations for review by the City Engineer. 2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall: A. Provide for the required right-of-way necessary to construct the east/west cul-de-sac on the property line between this project and the property owned by the Holaseks. B. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans and utility plans for review by the City Engineer. C. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. 3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Pay the Cash Park Fee. B. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. i . C. Stake the proposed construction limits with a snow fence. Any trees lost outside of the snow fenced area shall be replaced on an area inch per area inch basis. All snow fencing shall remain on each site until occupancy permit has been issued for each lot. 4. All grading and pad locations shall be limited to those areas where shown on { the proposed grading plan. Prior to release of the final plat by the City, Developer shall submit to the City, and receive the City's approval of covenants and restrictions for each individual lot, which shall require the following: / 17 Cardinal Creek Ridge 5 March 20, 1987 Section 3. It shall be the sole responsibility of Developer/owner to prepare a Surveyors Certificate in accordance with Approved Grading Pian and revisions thereto, including the following information,_prior to issuance of a building permit; (a) Determine if additional courses of concrete block will be necessary below the basement level and if so, how many courses of concrete block will be necessary to mitigate construction impact. (b) Determine the grading limits that will be subject to the overall grading of each lot site and designate foundation elevations. (c) Determine the location of appropriate_ erosion control to be established before grading of the lot and construction of the home which will help serve as protection to vegetation which shall remain behind the proposed home. 5• No occupancy permit shall be issued for Lots 1-8 and Lots 11-32 until the County has competed construction for the realignment of Baker Road. 6• Restrictive covenants shall be required for Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, & 12, which limits grading and pad location to the approved plan and requires the use of extra block. 7• Bonding shall be required for 2,128 caliper inches of tree replacement. '=II Planning Commission Minutes 9 March 23, 1987 C. CARDINAL CREEK RIDGE, by Countryside Investments, Inc. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential on 23.1 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 23.1 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review, with Zoning from Rural to R1-13.5 with variances on 23.1 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 23.1 acres into 40 single family lots and road right-of-way. Location: East of Baker Road and Edenvale Boulevard intersection, west of Interstate I-494. Mr. Ron Krueger, representing proponent, explained the features of the development to the Commission. He explained the special provisions that would be required of individual lot builders in order to preserve trees and to protect the slopes of the property. Mr. Krueger stated that the latest information regarding the upgrading of Baker Road was that the bids would be opened in mid-April and that the construction would begin in May, with a scheduled completion some time in July, 1987. He said that Hennepin County had requested that there be no occupancy permits issued for the property until the road was open, and that the proponents had no difficulty in complying with this request. Planner Franzen reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report ecommendations March regarrding987, with the tilities, streets,mstormnwaterhedrainage,s tandard r erosion control, park dedication fees, and tree replacement, he noted special concerns for individual lot grading and covenants to implement the special conditions of that individualized grading plan. He noted, also, that there was a difference between the amount of tree replacement as calculated by the ( Staff and as calculated by the proponent. Planner Franzen stated that he believed these matters could be worked out with the proponent prior to City Council review of the proposed development. After review of the development with the City Forester, it was determined that it may be possible to save more trees on the property, even during the • Planning Commission Minutes 10 March 23, 1987 construction of housing on the individual lots. The Forester pointed out that if the root system of any tree was destroyed by 50%, or more, the tree would die. Therefore, Staff would try to work with the developer to provide "credit" toward the tree replacement on the property for any trees not destroyed by housing construction. Mr. Oscar Miller, 6521 Baker Road, stated that he did not object to the development as proposed. He stated that he had been working with the • proponents toward an equitable agreement for all parties. Mr. Miller stated that his only concern was that legal descriptions for zoning of the property be accurate, as the first draft he had seen was not correct. He asked that special attention be paid to this so that the majority of his property not be rezoned, and that only that portion he was trading with the proponents become zoned. Planner Franzen assured him that this would be checked by Staff several times prior to publication of any zoning ordinance by the City. Mr. Art Roberts, 13543 Woodmere Circle, stated that he was a representative of the Cardinal Creek Homeowners' Association and that their only request was that the name be changed to elminate the word "Creek" from the title so as to avoid confusion with their existing development. Ruebling asked the proponents if they were willing to comply with all the recommendations of the Staff Report, in particular the portion dealing with the covenants and restrictions for the grading on the individual lots. Mr. Arvid Schwartz, Countryside Investments, stated that they were willing to do so. Fell asked about the need for a transition between the proposed single family use on this property and the area designated for Community Commercial use to the north. Planner Franzen stated that the future residents of this area would know that this area was being developed as Community Commercial as it was under construction at this time. He added that there was another • parcel between this property and that portion guided for Community Commercial use where additional transition could take place. Mr. Krueger stated that the current owner of the property being proposed for development by Countryside Investments had tried to purchase the parcel between this use and the Community Commercial property to the north. At this point in time, the property was not available, but the owners were aware of his interest at such time as they would be ready to sell. Chairman Schuck asked for comments, or questions, from members of the audience. There were none. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by Fell, to close the public hearing. Motion carried--6-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by Fell, to recommend to the City Council ('( Planning Commission Minutes 11 March 23, 1987 approval of the request of Countryside Investments, Inc., for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential on 23.1 acres for Cardinal Creek Ridge, based on plans dated March 6, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report of March 20, 1987. Motion carried--6-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by Fell, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Countryside Investments, Inc., for Planned Unit Development Concept, for Cardinal Creek Ridge, based on plans dated March 6, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 20, 1987. Motion carried--6-0-0 MOTION 4: Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by Fell, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Countryside Investments, Inc., for Planned Unit Development District Review, with variances for front yard setback, and l Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 for 23.1 acres for Cardinal Creek Ridge, based on plans dated March 6, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 20, 1987. Motion carried--6-0-0 MOTION 5: Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by Fell, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Countryside Investments, Inc., for Preliminary Plat of 23.1 acres into 37 single family lots for Cardinal Creek Ridge, based on plans dated March 6, 1987, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 20, 1987. Motion carried--6-0-0 V. OLD BUSINESS None. VI. NEW BUSINESS None. VII. PLANNER'S REPORT None. VIII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN was made by Ruebling, seconded by Hallett. Chairman Schuck adjourned the meeting at 10:05 P.M. 1 UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Monday, April 6, 1987 7:30 p.m., 8600 Executive Drive COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Pat Breitenstein, chairperson; Bud Baker (late), Moe Cook, Karon Joyer, Brian Mikkelson (late), Charles Shaw (late) COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: None COMMISSION STAFF: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services OTHERS PRESENT: Rick Bolinske, Superintendent of Recreation; Lyndell Frye, Recreation Supervisor; Tom Eastman, Supervisor of Operations; Lori Melling, V. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. Cardinal Creek Ridge Refer to staff report dated March 20, 1987. Arvid Schwartz, President of Countryside Investments, was present at the meeting. Mr. Schwartz said that they have several developments in Eden Prairie, the newest being the Tree Farm ( Subdivision. Cardinal Creek Ridge is located south of Cardinal Creek, north of the Richard Holasek property, east of 494 and west of Baker Road. The site is located on 24 acres and will be divided into 40 single family lots. Schwartz said there is a ridge on the site which will be preserved to the greatest degree possible. This site will be developed at the same time as Cardinal Hills because Countryside Investments and New American Homes share a common access. There are a significant number of trees on the site and the developer plans to replace 3500+ caliper inches of trees. The tree replacement will be done in phases during two seasons of the year and as homes are built. Lambert said the major concerns of this commission are grading and tree replacement. Baker Road will be realigned in the near future and an asphalt trail will be added on one side with a sidewalk on the other side. Lambert said he feels the developer has done a good job of preserving as many trees as possible and he recommends approval of the proposal. Cook said that the staff report states that 22 feet will be cut off the top of the knoll in order to accommodate development. He asked if there were any other possibilities to consider. Lambert said that when there is a ridge of this type, not less than what is being proposed can be done when homes are being built. Baker asked about the problem the developer was having with access to the Miller property. Schwartz said that Mr. Miller doesn't want his land to be developed although they have come to an agreement. Per Mr. Miller's request, the developer is moving his existing house to an adjacent lot and adding a double attached garage. k:,_ MOTION: Cook moved to recommend approval of Cardinal Creek Ridge per staff recommendation. Gonyera,�seconded the motion and it passed 7-0. • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 87-92 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 3rd day of March fixed the 21st day of April, 1987 as the date for public hearing on the following proposed improvements. I.C. 52-104 - Prairie View Dr./St. Andrew Dr. Utility and Street Improvements WHEREAS, all property owners whose property is liable to be assessed for making, of this improvement were given ten days published notice of the Council hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice and the hearing was held and property owners heard on the 21st day of April, 1987. , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such improvement as above indicated is hereby ordered. 2. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for this project and is hereby directed to prepare plans and specifications for the . making of such improvements with the assistance of RCM, Inc. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 21, 1987. . Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Franc, Clerk 1 (7y 4 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 87-93 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 17th day of March fixed the. 21st day of April, 1987. as the date for public hearing on the following proposed improvements. I.C. 52-105 - Bennett Place and Blossom Road Utility and Street Improvements WHEREAS, all property owners.whose property is liable to be assessed for making of this improvement were given ten days published notice of the Council hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice and the hearing was held and property owners heard on the 21st day of April, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such improvement as above indicated .is hereby ordered. 2. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for this project and is hereby directed to prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvements with the assistance of RCM Inc. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 21, 1987. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk i1 DISTRIBUTIONS BY FUND 10 GF2IERAL 366277.27 11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT 6235.51 15 :.LIQUOR STORE—P V M 41527.93 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE 37401.71 :PARKs:ACQUIST & DEVELOP 106.69 33 UTILITY BOND FUND 440431.43 39 •;86FIRE STATION CONSTRUCT 214.37 45 'UTILITY DEBT FD ARB 254289.13 47 80 G•0 DEBT FUND 278689.81 51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 212436.33 55 IMPROVEMENT DEBT FUND ARB 824652.35 56 ROAD IMPROVEMENT DEBT FD 827803.32 73 WATER FUND 35621.92 77 SEWER FUND 191321.98 81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 8258.28 $3525268.03 • • • • • • 7 1(2 APRIL 21,1987 30874 VOID OUT CHECK 241.48- 32831 VOID OUT CHECK 50.00- 33352 VOID OUT CHECK 50.00- 33761 VOID OUT CHECK 91 VOID OUT CHECK 73.83- ,92 VOID OUT CHECK 40.00- 33793 VOID OUT CHECK 42.37- 33794 VOID OUT CHECK 51.75- 33795752.75- VOID OUT CHECK663.50- 33796 VOID OUT CHECK 33797 VOID OUT CHECK 29.05- 33798 VOID OUT CHECK 9.25- 33799 VOID OUT CHECK 360.22- 33800 VOID OUT CHECK 461.53- 33801 VOID OUT CHECK 4471.50- 33802 VOID OUT CHECK 47.00- 33803 VOID OUT CHECK 52.00- 33804 VOID OUT CHECK 70.00- 33805 VOID OUT CHECK 370.50- 33806 VOID OUT CHECK 90.18- 33807 VOID OUT CHECK 50.00- 33808 VOID OUT CHECK 621.31- 33809 VOID OUT CHECK 21.56- 3381021.5 - VOID OUT CHECK 933811 VOID OUT CHECK 1702.37- 33812 VOID OUT CHECK 121.27 33813 VOID OUT CHECK 161.00- 33814 VOID OUT CHECK 381.00- 381.00- 34032 AT & T COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 32.72 34033 KATHY HANSON REFUND-AEROBICS CLASS 4.00 34 CAMILLE MCARDLE REFUND-EXERCISE CLASS 30.00 34u35 MN DANCE THEATRE SERVICE-MN DANCE THEATRE 1200.00 34036 MINNESOTA GAS CO SERVICE 3360.38 34037 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 4819.10 34038 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 70.24 34039 PETTY CASH CHANGE FUND-HISTORICUL CULTURE 75.00 34040 CITY-COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 3-20-87 1828.13 34041 JAMES CHICKS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 11.00 34042 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-UTILITY BILLING 307.72 34043 ST PAUL RED CROSS CONFERENCE-COMMUNITY CENTER 75.00 34044 SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTER INC APRIL 87 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 4282.46 34045 CINDY COLLINS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 18.00 34046 SOUTHWEST TRAILS ASSN SNOWMOBILE TRAIL GRANT-COMMUNTIY SERVICES 6321.28 34047 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 5328.74 34048 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 1109.08 34049 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 1211.86 34050 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 9135.73 34051 QUALITY WINE CO WINE 5546.81 34052 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR LIQUOR 3342.89 34053 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO WINE 1714.83 34054 PAUSTIS& SONS CO WINE 414.16 34055 NEW ULM HOLIDAY INN CONFERENCE-WATER DEPT 113.36 34056 VOID OUT CHECK 0.00 34057 DANA GIBBS PACKET DELIVERIES 117.00 34058 MN COMMUNITY BAND FESTIVAL COMMUNITY BAND/FEES PD 30.00 J0241 i : i'? APRIL 21,1987 34059 CITY OF ST ANTHONY EMPLOYERS SHARE OF MUNICIPAL BANQUET COSTS 93.50 34060 BEER WHOLESALERS INC BEER 4018.10 34061 CAPITA. CITY DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 50.15 '62 COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIX 542.25 J63 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 4709.40 34064 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER 8083.15 34065 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 222.70 34066 MARK VII SALES BEER 15223.97 34067 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO MIX 533.25 34068 ROYAL CROWN BEVERAGE CO MIX 207.20 34069 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 10427.95 34070 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 3288.78 34071 PETTY CASH EXPENSES 65.19 34072 BRENDAN DONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 22.00 34073 ANNIE ERMANIS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 11.00 34074 ANDREW BRILL REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 14.00 34075 MEGAN LINK REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 11.00 34076 COLLEGE OF ST THOMAS CONFERENCE-ASSESSING DEPT 175.00 34077 GOVNT TRAINING SERVICE CONFERENCE-ASSESSING DEPT 50.00 34078 CANDY GLOMSRUD REFUND-MEMBERSHIP 59.25 34079 CITY-COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 4-3-87 1878.13 34080 VOID OUT CHECK 0.00 34081 VOID OUT CHECK 0.00 34082 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 3-20-87 10363.39 34083 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 4-3-87 10568.85 34084 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN APRIL HEALTH INSURANCE 15599.38 34085 GROUP HEALTH PLAN INC APRIL HEALTH INSURANCE 2262.65 34086 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC APRIL HEALTH INSURANCE ?820.75 34087 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 3-20-87 4878.00 38 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 4-3-87 4878.00 34089 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP PAYROLL 3-20-87 685.00 34090 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP PAYROLL 4-3-87 685.00 34091 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO APRIL LIFE INSURANCE 695.18 34092 PER A APRIL LIFE INSURANCE 108.00 34093 COMMERCIAL LIFE INSURANCE APRIL LIFE INSURANCE 225.45 34094 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG APRIL UNION DUES 714.00 34095 PERA PAYROLL 3-20-87 20906.44 34096 PERA PAYROLL 4-3-87 21744.27 34097 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS PAYROLL 3-20-87 & 4-3-87 337.76 34098 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK PAYROLL 3-6-87 & 3-20-87 200.00 34099 WELSH COMPANIES MARCH & APRIL LEASE-CITY HALL 1043.18 34100 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 3-20-87 39965.89 34101 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 4-3-87 41629.50 34102 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 76.85 34103 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 1177.77 34104 AT & T COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 185.25 34105 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 787.79 34106 MN DEPT OF P/S -TAX EXEMPT PLATES FOR HOMEMADE TRAILER- 30.00 PARK MAINTENANCE 34107 SHAFER CONTRACTING INC SERVICE-COUNTY RD 4 TO MITCHELL ROAD 196213.40 34108 SHAW LUNDQUIST ASSOC INC SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDITIONS 416880.90 34109 ABC EXPRESS TRUCK TRAILER DAMAGE-WATER DEPT 300.82 1 ' : 34110 A & H WELDING & MFG CO WATER DEFUSER REPAIRS-WATER DEPT 76.00 34111 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER LOG SPLITTER RENTAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 53.00 ? 12 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES & FURNITURE-CITY HALL 5349.77 85612821 C1 Z 1 APRIL 21,1987 34113 ADMIRAL WASTE MIGHT INC APRIL 87 TRASH DISPOSAL-PUBLIC SAFETY 51.75 34114 AIM ELECTRONICS INC HOCKEY SCOREBOARD REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER 32.30 34115 AIRLIFT DOORS INC GARAGE DOOR REPAIRS-PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 70.00 ( 116 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN MEMBERSHIP DUES-PLANNING DEPT 15.00 .17 AMRE DECK CO REFUND-BUILDING PERMIT 40.00 34118 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC SIGNS-STREET MAINTENANCE 146.10 34119 ANSAFONE OF MN INC PHONE INSTALLATION-NEW CITY OFFICES 4802.00 34120 ARMOR SECURITY INC 2ND QTR SECURITY SYSTEM-SENIOR CENTER 142.50 34121 ASLA MEMBERSHIP MEMBERSHIP DUES-PARK PLANNING 111.00 34122 ATKINS MECHANICAL REFUND-HYDRANT PERMIT & METER PERMIT 268.07 34123 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY -REDUCER/PRIMER/HARDENER/CONVERTER/PAINT/ 432.89 -CARTRIDGES/PREFILTERS-PARK MAINTENANCE & STREET MAINTENANCE 34124 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE CO -WHEEL ALIGNMENT/STARTER REPAIRS-FIRE 144.95 DEPT &EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 34125 BALLARD MOVING& STORAGE CO MOVING EXPENSES-NEW CITY OFFICES 7364.00 34126 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC BATTERIES/SIGNAL LAMP-EQUIPMENT MNTC 88.51 34127 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY SERVICE 591.00 34128 BLACK& VEATCH SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION 8449.03 34129 MS OFFICE STORES INC TYPEWRITER REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER 36.00 34130 BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC & MFG CO BELT-COMMUNITY CENTER 30.02 34131 BRADY OFFICEWARE TYPING TABLE/WASTEBASKET-HUMAN RESOURCES 235.99 34132 LEE BRANDT HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 271.00 34133 BRUNSON INSTRUMENT CO -TRIANGLES/BATTERIES/FIBERGLASS TAPE/ 375.27 -PAINT/PENCILS/CAMERA REPAIRS-ENGINEERING DEPT 34134 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC ROCK-PARK MAINTENANCE & STREET MAINTENANCE 466.27 34135 BURTON EQUIPMENT INC EQUIPMENT REPAIRS-WATER DEPT 122.21 ;.. 34136 BUSINESS FURNITURE INC -FILE DRAWER REPAIR-ASSESSING DEPT/CHAIRS- 693.50 HUMAN RESOURCES 34i37 DANIEL J CARLSON MEETING EXPENSES 13.00 34138 CERTIFIED RUSTPROFFERS INC RUSTPROOFING CITY VEHICLES 890.00 34139 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 13.24 34140 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO LEGAL ADS 88.92 34141 CITICORP INDUSTRIAL CREDIT MAY 87 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 656.81 34142 CLIMATE MAKERS INC AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER 243.04 34143 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER -MOBILE RADIO WITH ANTENNA-$1036.34/ 1288.34 ANTENNAS & CABLES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 34144 COMMUNITY LEGAL ED SUBSCRIPTION-HUMAN RESOURCES 4.00 34145 COMPUTER KNOW HOW COMPUTER TRAINING-FIRE DEPT 80.00 34146 CONCEPT MICROFILM INC MICROFILMING-ENGINEERING DEPT 432.00 34147 SPENCER L CONRAD MEETING EXPENSES 142.13 34148 JEFFREY CONRADI HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 132.00 !.:.. 34149 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN SUBSCRIPTION-ENGINEERING DEPT 65.00 34150 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC SEAL COATING-STREET MAINTENANCE 810.00 34151 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY INC -WRENCHES/BELTS/SANITIZER CLEANER/GLOVES/ 6716.10 -SMOKE FLUID/HELMETS/SHIELDS/BREATHING -APPARATUS/COMPOSITE CYLINDER/HOSE GASKETS & COUPLINGS-FIRE DEPT 34152 COPY EQUIPMENT INC -PLANHOLD FILE& OFFICE SUPPLIES-PARK 606.68 -PLANNING/PAINT-STREET DEPT/EQUIPMENT -REPAIRS-ENGINEERING DEPT/LAMP-BUILDING DEPT 34153 CURTIS INDUSTRIES -SCREWS/WIRE/BOLT SHIELD/BOLT ANCHOR/ 129.81 CONNECTORS-WATER DEPT 3729043 tYa APRIL 21,1987 34154 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 3254.64 34155 WARD F DAHLBERG MARCH 87 EXPENSES 80.00 34156 DALCO -CLEANING SUPPLIES-PUBLIC SAFETY & 534.01 COMMUNITY CENTER c,57 DELUXE COMPUTER FORMS COMPUTER FORMS-POLICE DEPT 73.42 34158 DEPENDABLE HEATING REFUND-BUILDING PERMITS 7.20 34159 DIXIE PETRO-CHEM INC CHLORINE-WATER DEPT 646.95 34160 DOLPHIN CONSTRUCTION REFUND-OVERPAYMENT FOR BUILDING PERMIT 34.97 34161 DORSEY & WHITNEY r LEGAL SERVICE-CERTIFICATES ISSUED 5300.00 34162 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 67.36 34163 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER 269.60 34164 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU EXPENSES-CITY HALL 26.45 34165 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU EXPENSES-CITY HALL 98.45 34166 DURO-TEST CORP LIGHTBULBS-LIQUOR STORE 625.66 34167 EAGLE SNACKS INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 46.89 34168 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPT SCHOOL & EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 485.16 34169 YOID OUT CHECK. 0.00 34170 E P LIQUOR #1 SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 54.46 34171 EDEN PRAIRIE TRASHTRONICS MARCH 87 TRASH DISPOSAL 410.00 34172 CITY OF EDINA MARCH 87 WATER TESTS 91.00 34173 EGAN MCKAY ELECTRICAL CONT SERVICE-TH5 & COUNTY RD 4 937.00 34174 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC -HIP BOOTS/GOGGLES-WATER DEPT/CHEMICALS- 203.33 COMMUNITY CENTER 34175 EPA AUDIO VISUAL INC SLIDE PROJECTOR WITH ZOOM LENS-POLICE DEPT 334.55 34176 EPPA EYE EXAM & TREATMENT-WATER DEPT 50.00 34177 EQUITY CONSTRUCTION CO SIGN FOR NEW CITY HALL 323.00 34178 RON ESS HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 283.00 34179 FAIRCHILD METRO MARKETING ADS-LIQUOR STORE 385.00 11180 FILTRATION SYSTEMS INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 144.82 A FIRST TRUST BOND PAYMENT 239475.00 34182 FITNESS ASSOCIATES INC STRESS TESTS-FIRE DEPT & POLICE DEPT 640.00 34183 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 504.65 34184 G & K SERVICES -TOWELS/COVERALLS-PARK MAINTENANCE/WATER 367.D9 DEPT & LIQUOR STORE 34185 G L CONTRACTING INC -SERVICE-COUNTY RD 4 & VALLEY VIEW RD/ 1113.00 GERARD AVENUE 34186 GARDNER HARDWARE CO LOCKS-COMMUNITY CENTER 97.50 34187 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC RADIO REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 477.97 34188 ROBERT GIBB REFUND-FIRE HYDRANT DEPOSIT 12.22 34189 JEANETTE GILLIS KIDS KORNER INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD 329.00 34190 GOODYEAR TRUCK TIRE CENTERS TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1185.70 34191 R L GOULD & CO INC LAWN MOWER REPAIRS-PARK MAINTENANCE 161.68 34192 GROSS OFFICE SUPPLY OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 107.12 34193 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC BALLASTS-COMMUNITY CENTER 29.55 34194 HACH CO LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 386.58 34195 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC -SERVICE-INERNATICNAL SCHOOL WATER MAIN/ 5672.06 -SUNNYBROOK RD/BLUFFS EAST 4TH ADDITION/ BLUFFS WEST VICINITY STORM SEWER 34196 HARMON GLASS SIDE MIRRORS-PARKS DEPT 20.00 34197 LAURIE MELLING MILEAGE 64.20 34198 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER FEBRUARY 87 TREE DEBRIS DISPOSAL 272.50 34199 HENNEPIN CTY CHIEFS OF POLICE SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 580.00 34200 D C HEY CO INC SERVICE 75.00 34201 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUPPLY CO FLOOR FINISH-COMMUNITY CENTER 157.20 3' '2 JACK HOENE HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 247.50 26674244 1 f '(')J APRIL 21,1987. 34203 HOFFERS INC FIELD MARKING-PARK MAINTENANCE 457.00 34204 HOIGARDS TARP PATCH-FIRE DEPT 30.00 34205 HORWITZ REFUND-WATER & SEWER PERMIT 28.96 06 MIKE HOSTETLER HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 278.00 07 IBM INSTALL COPIER AT NEW CITY OFFICES 322.25 34208 IBM -1987 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT & 1580.00 CITY HALL 34209 ICMA BOOK-COMMUNITY CENTER 19.95 34210 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST#272 MARCH 87 CUSTODIAL SERVICE 2580.45 34211 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/TONER-CITY HALL 916.87 34212 JET PHOTO LABS FILM PROCESSING-POLICE DEPT 5.88 34213 JET PHOTO LABS FILM DEVELOPING-ASSESSING DEPT 17.46 34214 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 107.31 34215 KAY JOHNSON EXERCISE INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD 148.00 34216 JUSTUS LUMBER CO -PLYWOOD/PEGBOARD-POLICE DEPT & EQUIPMENT 267.52 MAINTENANCE 34217 KOKESH ATHLETIC SUPPLIES INC BAG-COMMUNITY CENTER 11.98 34218 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER -BOLTS/DRILL BITS/PLUG/LIGHTBULBS/STAPLES/ 84.65 -WIRE/PAINT ROLLER/PAINT TRAYS/RAZOR SCRAPER & BLADES/GLUE-WATER DEPT 34219 MICHAEL KREBSBACH MILEAGE 22.25 34220 LA HASS MFG & SALES INC TRUCK BED LINERS-WATER DEPT 510.00 34221 LAKELAND CARPET & UPHOLSTERY SERVICE 45.00 34222 LANCE SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 59.40 34223 LANG PAULY& GREGERSON LTD DECEMBER 86 ADDITIONAL LEGAL SERVICE 3176.25 34224 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD JANUARY 87 LEGAL SERVICE 18872.45 34225 LEEF BROS INC -COVERALLS-PUBLIC WORKS/RUG CLEANING-CITY 136.20 HALL 34226 LEFEVERE LEFLER KENNEDY FEBRUARY 87 LEGAL SERVICE 1067.65 r7 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC NORELCO RECORDER-COMMUNITY SERVICES 231.20 3 228 LOGIS FEBRUARY 87 SERVICE 9959.15 34229 LOUISVILLE LANDFILL INC LANDFILL CHARGES-PARK MAINTENANCE 40.50 34230 LYMAN LUMBER CO -PLYWOOD/BOARD SCREWS/CEMENT BOARD/ROUGH 202.94 -CEDAR-STREET DEPT/PARK DEPT/ENGINEERING DEPT 34231 LYNDE COMPANY FLUORESCENT DYE-SEWER DEPT 67.80 34232 MLA INTERIOR DESIGN MARCH 87 DESIGN SERVICES-NEW CITY OFFICES 125.00 34233 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO -OIL/SEALS/GRINDING WHEEL/ROLLER/RIM/ 306.71 -WASHERS/BUSHINGS/SEALS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & PARK MAINTENANCE 34234 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC -DRIVE DISC/BEARING/WASHERS/CABLE- 124.68 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 34235 MIKE MARUSHIN SOCKET SET/GAUGES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 40.45 34236 MAUREEN MAGNUSON SERVICE-SUMMER BROCHURE 25.00 34237 MARSHALL & SWIFT SUBSCRIPTION-ASSESSING DEPT 86.00 34238 REGAN L MASSEE MEETING EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 13.55 34239 MASYS CORPORATION MAY 87 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 1050.00 34240 MATTS AUTO SERVICE INC TOW SERVICE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 28.00 34241 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC EXPENSES-CITY HALL & PUBLIC SAFETY 24.95 34242 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 7.02 34243 TIM MCGOVERN HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 86.00 34244 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT 52.08 34245 MERIT/JULIAN GRAPHICS ENVELOPES & LETTERHEAD-CITY HALL 931.10 34246 MERLINS HARDWARE HANK -LOCK/NUTS & BOLTS/EXIT SIGNS/SCREWS/ 37.70 -HIDES-COMMUNITY CENTER/PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING & POLICE DEPT 4418531 `� 1 34248 METRE SYSFURNITURE -DESK-$737 00%DESK-$450.00/2 CREDENZAS- 1;3;.77 $242.00"EA/LATERAL FILE- -2 BOOKCASES-$168.00 EA-CITY MANAGER/ ASSESSING DEPT & ENGINEERING DEPT 149 METROPOLITAN FIRE EQUIP CO -DRY CHEMICALS-COMMUNITY CENTER/PARK 1351.55 MAINTENANCE & FIRE DEPT 34250 METRO MECHANICAL CONTR INC EQUIPMENT REPAIRS-WATER DEPT 499.00 34251 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION MAY 87 SEWER SERVICE 89800.90 34252 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION FEBRUARY 87 SAC CHARGES 36382.50 34253 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION MARCH 87 SAC CHARGES 61850.25 34254 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 362.03 34255 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE 47.70 34256 HERMAN MILLER INC -MODULAR OFFICE EQUIPMENT (WORKSURFACES/ 31447.36 PANELS/ELECTRICAL)-NEW CITY OFFICES 34257 MPLS AREA CHAPTER WORSHOP-COMMUNITY CENTER 6.00 34258 MARION MILLER KIDS KORNER INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD 413.00 34259 MN CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 66.29 34260 MN CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 29.97 34261 MN FRAMES & PRINTS ETC FRAME FOR CITY MAP-COMMUNITY SERVICES 132.50 34262 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER & 392.40 34263 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC ADS-LIQUOR STORE 280.08 34264 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP SERVICE 37.75 34265 M-V GAS CO SERVICE 224.00 34266 MINUTEMAN PRESS FORMS-BUILDING DEPT 450.85 34267 BRAD MOEN REFUND-FIRE HYDRANT DEPOSIT 129.49 34268 MOTOROLA INC RADIO REPAIRS-FIRE DEPT 656.17 34269 MUNITECH INC WATER METER REPAIRS-WATER DEPT 232.31 34270 MY CHEESE SHOP EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 16.32 34271 NAIL RECREATION & PARK ASSN MEMBERSHIP DUES-COMMUNITY CENTER 85.00 34272 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN EMPLOYMENT ADS-CITY HALL 219.82 ( 73 NAIL OFFICE INTERIORS INC -3 CHAIRS $1065.15/12 CHAIRS FOR COUNCIL 5997.15 ROOM $4932.00-CITY HALL & COUNCIL 34274 DENNY NESBITT EXPENSES-BUILDING DEPT 17.98 34275 NORWEST BANK MINNEAPOLIS NA BOND PAYMENTS 1945959.61 34276 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC -MSDOS USERS GUIDE-FINANCE DEPT/REPAIR 126.82 PRINTER-COMMUNITY CENTER 34277 PMS SERVICE CORP MARCH & APRIL 87 CUSTODIAL SERVICE 1647.52 34278 PSQ BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS INC PHONE SYSTEM-NEW CITY OFFICES 8365.00 34279 PEDERSON SELLS EQUIP CO INC COUPLINGS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 18.11 34280 PENNSYLVANIA OIL CO OIL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 270.65 34281 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 555.50 11 34282 CONNIE L PETERS MILEAGE 23.25 34283 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO -RIM/PINTLE HOOKS/MAGNETS/SHOE LININGS/ 735.09 -HUB & DRUMS/SPRING BOLT/NUTS/EQUALIZER ARM/GREASE SEAL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 34284 PLAQUES PLUS INC PLAQUES FOR AWARDS BANQUET 465.47 34285 KEITH POKELA VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 143.00 34286 POMMER MFG CO INC -TROPHIES & PLAQUES FOR VOLLEYBALL/ 813.00 BASKETBALL & BROOMBALL 34287 POWER BRAKE EQUIPMENT CO -BRAKE REPAIR KITS/BACK UP ALARMS- 461.82 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 34288 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -KEYS CUT/SPRAY BOTILE/CONNECTORS- 8.44 FIRE DEPT ,-")490242 ��2 34289 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -RAKE/ROD/WALL ANCHORS/NUTS/WASHERS/TOOL -BOX/BATTERIES/STAPLES/HAMMER/KEYS CUT/ 92.73 -KEY RINGS/CHISEL/DRILL BITS/SANDPAPER- WATER DEFT 34290 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -GLOSS ENAMEL/SANDPAPER/PAINT BRUSHES/ 294.04 —SEALER/METAL PRIMER/BOLTS/PAINT/TUNE-UP -GAUGE/RUSTOLEUM/KEYS CUT/LIGHT SWITCH/ -BATTERIES/RADIO/TAPE/LIGHTBULBS/V-BELT/ -PAINT THINNER/GRINDER/PADLOCKS/HAMMER -HOLDER/UTILITY HOOK/PLUGS/DRILL BITS- COMMUNITY CENTER 34291 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -JIG SAW/CHAIN/HOOKS/CLEANING SUPPLIES/ 255.02 -SPRAY PAINT/ENAMEL/SAW BLADES SHARPENED/ -PAINT BRUSHES/CUTTER/BRACKETS/LIGHTBULBS/ -PAINT/DRYWALL/WOOD TRIM/VARNISH/TAPE/BELT SANDERS-PARK MAINTENANCE 34292 PRAIRIE HARDWARE SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 5.84 34293 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -SIGNS/PAPER PRODUCTS/FILTERS/PAINT/PAINT 525.17 -BRUSHES/BATTERIES/STAPLES/SEALER/CLEANER/ -RUSTOLEUM/BUSHINGS/HINGE/PEGBOARD HOOKS/ -PAPER/VARNISH/POWER PAINTER/CONCRETE MIX/ -CHAIN/DRAIN VALVE/COUPLINGS/PIPE/HAMMER HANDLE/WEATHER STRIPPING/NAILS-STREET DEPT 34294 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -STATIC GUARD/ANCHORS/ANCHOR KIT/KEYS CUT/ 244.19 SCREWS/WASHERS/CLEANING SUPPLIES/BOLTS/ -NUTS/WRENCH/CABLE/STAPLE GUN/BATTERIES/ COUPLINGS-CITY HALL 34295 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -CORKS/FLUORESCENT LAMPS/MAUL HANDLES/TOOL 178.28 POUCHES/BELT-SEWER DEPT 34296 PREMIER FASTENER COMPANY CUTTING TOOL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 35.63 34297 PRENTICE-HALL INC BOOK-POLICE DEPT 37.05 ( '98 PRINT SHACK PRINTING-COMMUNITY CENTER 318.70 .)-s299 PETTY CASH-PUBLIC SAFETY EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 22.22 34300 PUBLIC WORKS PUBLICATIONS EMPLOYMENT AD-CITY HALL 550.00 34301 MIKE ROGERS EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 34302 VAUGHNS INC AMERICAN FLAG-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 621.57 34303 VIKING BUSINESS INTERIORS INC STEEL SHELVING-FINANCE DEPT 8. 9 1 888 34304 VESSCO INC CHEMICAL FEEDER REPAIRS-WATER DEPT 1. 34305 VIKING LABORATORIES INC CHEMICALS-COMMUNITY CENTER 63690.00 34306 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP CO LIFT STATION PUMP REPAIRS-SEWER DEPT 47 .56 175.56 34307 R & R SPECIALTIES INC ZAMBONI BLADES SHARPENED-COMMUNITY CENTER 268.52 34308 RED ROCK HEIGHTS PARTNERSHIP SERVICE-RED ROCK ROAD WATER MAIN 12695.59 34309 REEDS SALES & SERVICE BED KNIFE-PARK MAINTENANCE 39.90 34310 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA CASH DRAWER-PLANNING DEPT 21.32 34311 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC -SERVICE-PRESERVE BLVD/SEWER POLICY PLAN/ 15339.61 -RIVER VIEW ROAD/RIVER VIEW DRIVE/HIDDEN -GLEN 3RD ADDITION/WYNDHAM KNOLL/PRAIRIE -VIEW DRIVE/BLOSSUM ROADWAY/BENNETT PLACE 34312 RIDGE DOOR SALES CO OF MN INC DOOR REPAIRS-FIRE STATIONS 240.15 34313 ST CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT 212.00 34314 STS CONSULTANTS LTD SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION 986.26 34315 LEE SCHNEIDER EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 9.42 34316 SEXTON DATA PRODUCTS INC FORMS-COMMUNITY CENTER 49.25 3868199 ( s: 6a. APRIL 21,1987 34317 SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM INC -FEBRUARY 87 SERVICE-NEW FIRE STATION & 321.06 COMMUNITY CENTER 18 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO PAINT/PAINT THINNER/BRUSHES-PARK DEPT 283.98 1, 319 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC WALL CLOCK-COMMUNITY CENTER 38.30 34320 STEVEN R SINELL MARCH 87 EXPENSES 191.15 34321 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP TRAY/BULB/CLAMPS/BITS-EQUIPMENT KNIT 32.75 34322 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC EMPLOYMENT AD-COMMUNITY CENTER & CITY HALL 432.00 34323 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC ADS-LIQUOR STORE 769.28 34324 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 20.42 34325 SPORTS WORLD -SHIRTS/LETTERING/RACQUETBALLS-COMMUNITY 517.00 CENTER 34326 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO CALCULATOR-COMMUNTIY CENTER 47.97 34327 W GORDON SMITH CO -REGULAR FUEL/TIES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE& 2355.76 PARK MAINTENANCE 34328 SOUTHWEST AUTO SUPPLY INC -MUDFLAPS/FUEL PUMP/BATTERIES/SPARK PLUGS/ 4524.13 -FILTERS/EXHAUST PIPE/BRASS FITTINGS/ -SWITCH CARBURATOR KIT/GREASE GUNS/FLOOR -MATS/BRAKE LINE/HOSES/IGNITION/CHASSIS/ -FILTER GASKET/FUEL PUMP/PLIERS/BATTERY -BRUSH/CHISEL/ASSEMBLY FLUID/CUSHIONS/ -DRAIN PLUG/U-JOINT/BELTS/SEALS/SPLASH -GUARD/LIGHTBULBS/SHIELD/MOTOR/VALVE JOB/ -VALVES/WATER PUMP/UNDERCOATING/ -TRANSMISSION KIT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & PARK MAINTENANCE 34329 EMMETT STARK COMMUNITY BAND DIRECTOR/FEES PD 425.25 34330 STATE TREASURER FEBRUARY 87 BUILDING PERMIT SURCHARGE 4324.45 34331 STATE TREASURER MARCH 87 BUILDING PERMIT SURCHARGE 5337.67 32 SULLIVANS SERVICES INC PUMP TANK-SENIOR CENTER 56.00 34333 SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTER INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 18.13 34334 TARGET STORES INC SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 73.65 34335 TARGET 220 EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER & CITY HALL 215.74 34336 TEAM LABORATORY CHEMICAL CORP DEGREASER-SEWER DEPT 960.00 34337 TENNESSEE CHEMICAL CO FLUORIDE-WATER DEPT 4637.01 34338 TEXGAS PARTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 15.70 34339 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 40.00 34340 MARC LEWIS THIELMAN MILEAGE 37.55 34341 TOTAL TOOL TUBE-WATER DEPT 18.29 34342 TRI-STATE VIDEO SERVICE INC CASSETTE COVER-POLICE DEPT 12.45 34343 VOID OUT CHECK 0.00 34344 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS PAINT-COMMUNITY CENTER 39.40 34345 TURSSO COMPANIES INC PAMPHLETS-POLICE DEPT 8.50 34346 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO TORCH REPAIRS/OXYGEN-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 49.49 34347 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICES UNIFORMS FOR CITY EMPLOYEES 1351.10 34348 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE MEMBERSHIP DUES-PLANNING DEPT 100.00 34349 KEITH WALL MEETING EXPENSES 95.52 34350 WATER PRODUCTS CO -49 GENERATORS $1176.00/SPADE HANDLE/ 18180.93 -SHOVEL HANDLE/DRAIN PLUNGERS/COUPLING -NUTS/VALVE WASHERS/RISER SCREWS/CLAMPS/ I- -GASKETS/TUBES/NOZZLE SECTIONS/4" 1000 GAL -COMP MTR $2069.00/3" 1000 GAL COMP MTR -$1266.00/CONNECTORS/174 5/8 X 3/4 100 GAL `. -MTR $7984.86/250 #2 OOPPERHORN $492.00/ WIRE ,,.51 SANDRA F WERTS MILEAGE 74.48 4560511 • APRIL 21,1987 34352 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC REGULATOR-COMMUNTYY CENTER 17.51 34353 WEST CENTRAL INDUSTRIES INC SURVEYORS LATH-ENGINEERING DEPT 316.80 34354 WESTERN DESIGN& PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS-POLICE DEPT 216.20 "'355 WESTONKA MECHANICAL REFUND-WATER& SEWER PERMIT 28.09 ,56 JOE WIETHOFF BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 27.00 34357 WILSON TANNER GRAPHICS -BUSINESS CARDS-ENGINEERING DEPT & 290.00 • ASSESSING DEPT/PLEXI-GLASS SIGNS-NEW CITY OFFICES 34358 YOUNGSTEDTS INC PARTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 29.95 34359 ZACK'S INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-PARK DEPT & STREET DEPT 176.66 34360 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE -1ST AID SUPPLIES-CITY HALL & COMMUNITY 217.95 CENTER 34361 ZEP MANUFACTURING CO CLEANING SUPPLIES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 307.05 34362 KAY ZUCCARO AQUA AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD 202.50 182971 $3525268.03 -`i (--Gr ti c Cardinal Hills /" (AKA Cardinal Creek 6th Addition) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 6-87 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA,.REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the R1-13.5 District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the R1-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of March 3, 2987, entered into between New American Homes, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and that certain Owners' Supplement to Developer's Agreement between Highland Companies, a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement and Owners' Supplement are hereby made a part hereof. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 17th day of February, 1987, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 21st day of April, 1987.. ATTEST: j . John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of 6a( w o u w r ✓T<:.✓ _ EXHIBIT A u vw..m m4� ••.cc ,C C C u c•'1 J C 0•• u'0 4 .0.C... ; M •= Legal Description .• N 9✓MD •• 0 n v d d 0 C uI400 N u u •.u.0 N.J C V",1'n M J.Z¢•1 uJ a C J O F m. TOY C.M C C ✓T m 0 J u u b 11.+> C u W d ••q .0 u N C M d C C C C^,0 C•CL.. ... =F O d Ns, J U w J t •f J.0 Z u ., O u X M C 0 • .' u✓ u C N N i b G N VI MT . W C w0 uOCW•JLu9 u uudu MC uurd.00: q L..w E 0 M 4•• u u u g C J TOW N w q . M C UwCW NX, J b C b+ Ww bwwu C0u U•MIO C NO•.... C C q ..00. WC w 0 0 0 u ..C C 11 u ...MC W d ww .J N W T 0 O F.W C C MC Mvw MULgqun UC 0 . .,.C C L^ .0 q 3 34 ...0 u C u u 0 C U C O••b u N•,H N L X '-Ow.' N'..0 dub 0 L u b T 9 .43 u U u 0 C q C I.I 4.0 C ..J... 0 • q 2 W O u U .0 "C L L C+ u L C W d ✓u g C U Q w 0.u 4 N L N 4 0 J u Y d..yuq SZ C6 N O. 0 3 L C u 4 . . N u u u W 9..L ✓f T P 4 0 0 C N N 0 4 C u u N C C 2 N d 0 o q u 417 Cm.- 0 q U•�b W C .•4 C C E W q u U P C L C C J •u"' W uUro C 4uC.... 0 y. 09..4u u ....^ J TO L 6 ro 0 L 4 g d•1 0.0 m H 0 Q^.u m 4.O N g q M A D • el ...... 4 4 4 4 m u..q.O..g m..q Y..I q 0. .... d w 0 W N N W 0.0 w 0 Y .. u 4 yam.0 C CC >LL. Nu mu .-I Vu nC C.In0C N Om C OLVY 4 M NM". D u u i C d 4 u WV 4 Y u ry . 4 0 0 ro W-. Y 0 0... 3 4 m N 4 m N 4 N M 4 10 0 4.O. MC N O C Y M Y 4 N u M 0 W L C. 0 0 u v U M w M b W C 4 W M w VC 4 W u M 0 C 0 0 0 u U 0 0 U 4 0 W q 0 _C 0 0 00 W0 Wy W 04.E 0 U w C,n00 CuC CY 00. m.Y C Z m ..m m T ,C N C 0 0 N y 0 Y 0 N m M9 uYuN 44ww NO.m00.mN40....1.•. . 4q+.W NuC C 0D.. ✓4.0 2 W 0NC9NC 90 C..C.4 T4 u 0 q C.. 'E 0 Nw 4C m0 0 C M W e m M C W 0.0... `9 m M✓ D m r E U•.E u O m C 4N 0 0.2m W Cu C O ON UON U.N U^IN dn.. N • •0 4ro C9 4 UN q 4.. 4N 4TmCN 400, WmNCMCMCCM0w4Nw • O C I. O u 0 4 p.0 W N WM W N,.. u W 0 C Y •�>•m 0 q C C 0 40 CO u L 0 C 0•.C. 3.... 0 C E 0 M 3 4 .Dr 0 O £4 u>•q q U W w w . 01 u 04111.0v C.O. N?•N J L Y IO u...J0 r wm 40..3 u .+ u.N]4.•1JY..0 N O O Cc ,00.. O 4u 0 00.0 U. .. U0.0.Y Cuy...c..CN0ICNOZVW C C q O• CgCroE 3 M0W .NNC W 4 40.4 M 0 u u DT.. M.W.M.0 Z 0 0 y2E 03 C 3 i Y 0 Y a.Y u•0i 014/UY✓YTD CNUq o O0,0 Nro mro 0 Or. N 0 0 U N 3 U N 0 U N U N C.. U 4 Wm 44,0 C. 2 0 X000 .2 U UOU'O•OrCCwCCwC4C C. •.. 0 co Yy„,„ = YC9•�Omw 0.0'0y4C 0N •Nw C. 0mW>E . 00 U M9 0C N NU004 0 U q Eu E.c Euc cL L u 0 a4 O. •ONO>E Q~ I. u M 4u 0 •+ 4 -.cm. q um 0u q J uu N Oa M..m0LO.YL dN -V _0. 0 M U Y g C J U L.�u N N N..Y N..u m y. q ..Y C O r 0 U 4 0�m N Y N u Y q N 1. F 0: 4 u q C u N um4 C 0 0.b . 0 0 0 U Y 4 .0 V 9 j 4 U u >. u O Y C O 0 0 0 0 9 ur it 0 C 00N C O 4 0 0 0 0 0•0 N U N 4 0 N 4 g 4 4 4 10 W Z U 4 n u 3 401 m N 0.N Y L 0.+U WXX O .0 a 0 C M•.C.0 0. N 3 C 'el!'41 0 W W 4 W 4 4 'O .4 0 C U N u M W W w f0 L^u 0 TY• 040• N MON0 OS N re w.Tu N ..E9,0NUCNU9 N.T.Y KU U 000094m94.. m0N.. YCu0C w9 N (.7 g N W Y>.t 0 y.0 u C u T w 9 m C 9 C ro P 4 N m C d 0 O Y.0 q u 4 N y 4 Z U� N bu... q U S u O 04 0 .DO • C Y q .. 0 i 0 L 4 3 W C O,W.. C 0 N U i..U u1 a 9 C 0 U u 00 i u N 0 4 O C w]L q 0 0 Y U 2N P 04 U O u • 0 y 0 0 0 u Eroy+'NNn0 N.0 uN 4 4 4 4N 2 C•.00 me u 4m 0Y N S C 0 14 cc C N L X wry C O.C R C MVW Y w i w Y N L••+ u 0 d C 4 u E ..1 E ..N•�L N O OVO YU.. 0 0 0010 N N O 0010 Op 0 0 0 N Co.4 M M q 4P CjNuu u 4.-•u N C 0 C0 O C 0 L O•rouuu A M 0 O Nh .r 0 4 4 4 0904 0r1 O3 O0q c O. U N M 0... m Y .4..CU M W 0 N 4 N 4 9 m 0 C C CV ro•.Ci u w W w w_ at"" q .Oa w C u M O C0.00 ..0 MO U N O N U N O O d w D m�. q NM NM N q w 0 w 0 M C q 6 0 w N 0 ..0 4 C 4 d 0 4 4 C 4 C 4 II!) C. p w¢ 0 C M M C Y 4 U 44 u U q u U*0 4 u q u 0 4 m 9 4 m 9 4 O C u C 3 4 w O 0 u 4 u 4 C u J C u 0 C Y>0 u 0 y C 9 .C. U u u u u 4 m C Y m C O U O•4 W u 0 T . W T N u 0 4 0•C 0 N C 4 N C d N O C N C d•+ •U 0.N U d 0 Q o q3 OUM� 44C0 0w Cww C•+w Lw D•e,0O O.NMNYN O^C C CC m,.w u 9..u m E u m 0 u m q .0 O y q 4 4 0 g 4 4 4 m 4 0 m 4 C L..O Y C E E E N m 9 Z W W 3.O N N 9 N N N y q u y e0 W N uuL.r C .. 1\ 0 u'O C N N u 0. u ✓ ..0.0 U...Y 0 O L P : .. • Z M W q u L C m t-. qr.....64w C 0. O 9 0 u 3 u Zr. C E'O 0 L 4 0 4 0 NJE.O Q Z u N M 4 U 0 u n 4 w Lq CC t X .. W 4 O. 4 1 Cardinal Hills 4: DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1987, by New American Homes, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential on 39.5 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 39.5 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 39.5 acres into 58 single family lots and three outlots, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #6-87, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: 1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the materials revised and dated March 17, 1987, reviewed and approved by the City Council on February 17, 1987, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein. 2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. Prior to release of the final plat by the City, Developer agrees to dedicate to the City all outlots as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said dedications shall be free and clear of any and all liens, mortgages, or encumbrances at—*•sltime of dedication. 4. Prior to issuance of any permit for grading or building upon the property, Developer agrees to submit to the Director of Planning, 4 and to receive the Director's approval of a planned road access for construction traffic to and from the property. Construction traffic shall be directed away from the existing neighborhood to the south, and said traffic shall not be allowed on existing Cardinal Creek Road. 5. Developer agrees that, concurrent with road construction on the property, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, a five-foot wide, five-inch thick concrete sidewalk along the north and east sides of the main road through the property, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Developer agrees to construct said sidewalk in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 6. Prior to release by the City of the final plat, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer,. and erosion control for the property. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 7. Developer agrees to notify the City and the Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of any grading, or tree removal, on the property. Prior to issuance of any permit for grading upon the property, Developer agrees to implement erosion control measures and adequate protective measures for areas to be preserved and areas where grading is not to occur, and to receive City approval of said measures. Prior to approval by the City, the Developer must call for on-site inspection of the property by the City, and defects in materials and workmanship in the implementation of said measures shall then be determined by the City. Defects in materials or workmanship shall then be corrected by the Developer, reinspected and approved by the City prior to issuance of the grading permit by the City. Approval of materials and workmanship may be subject to such conditions as the City may impose at the time of acceptance. 8. Concurrent with and as part of the grading upon the property, Developer agrees that Developer shall sod and stake all slopes to be constructed as 3 to 1, or greater, slopes and to stake the limits of said slopes with a snow fence for purposes of erosion control and slope protection. 9. Developer agrees to confine grading to that area of the property within the construction limits as shown on Exhibit B. Developer shall place snow fencing at the construction limits within the wooded areas of the property prior to any grading upon the property. I'. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning and receive the Director's approval of a tree inventory of those trees within the construction area and within 25 ft. outside of the construction area, indicating the size, type, and location of all trees twelve (12) inches in diameter, or greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground level. If any such trees are removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction area, Developer agrees that prior to issuance of any building permit for the property, Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of a replacement plan for all trees removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction area. Developer further agrees that said trees shall be replaced by similar tree species and that the k` trees used for replacement shall be no less than six inches in ;` diameter. The amount of trees to be replaced shall be determined by 1. the Director of Planning, using a square inch per square inch basis, according to the area of the circle created by a cross sectional cut through the diameter of a tree as measured 4.5 feet above the I ground. If a tree replacement plan is required, Developer agrees that, prior to issuance of any building permit, to submit a bond, or letter of ',!.` credit, guaranteeing completion of all tree replacement work as approved by the Director of Planning. The amount of the bond, or letter of credit, shall be 150% of the approved estimated cost of t" implementation of all tree replacement work and shall be in such form and contain such other provisions and terms as may be required by the Director of Planning. Developer agrees to prepare and submit for approval to the Director of Planning a written estimate of the costs of the tree replacement work to be completed. Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the Director of Planning. 10. Concurrent with the site construction on the property, the extension of the main roadway, and utilties, to Baker Road must be constructed. A special assessment agreement, or a letter of credit for the entire cost of the road and utilities segment must be in place prior to 2nd reading of the zoning ordinance. Additionally, one of the intersections along the primary roadway shall be reconfigured to provide a "T" intersection that will terminate at Cardinal Creek Road within the property. 11. Developer agrees that all construction traffic shall be directed to the new intersection with Baker Road, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said road intersection shall be constructed concurrent with utility and street construction for the property. Access from Cardinal Creek Road, located south of the property, shall be prohibited by an immovable barricade until street and utility construction is complete on the property and the first housing unit is completed within the subdivision. At that time, occupants of the housing structures on the property, only, shall be allowed to use the access to the south and construction vehicles shall continue to use the access at Baker Road. Developer agrees to submit to the City Engineer, and: receive the City Engineer's approval of plans for a traffic barrier to be located at the south end of the property at the current terminus of Cardinal Creek Road, as depicted in Exhibit 8, attached hereto. Developer agrees to construct, or cause to be constructed, said barrier, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. Said barrier shall be removed by Developer upon completion of streets and utilities and occupancy of the first housing unit on the property, and completion of a new public road intersection with Baker Road. Said intersection shall be in the location and of the specifications depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Developer agrees to place a sign at the intersection of the new road with Baker Road which directs all construction traffic on the new road, away from the existing neighborhood to the south. This.``sign shall be in place prior to any construction on the;,property, and shall remain in place until 75%of the lots have houses built and: occupied. 12. Prior to construction of any structures on the property, Developer agrees to submit to the City, and receive the City's approval of plans for a noise barrier for the purpose of protecting the property f from noise produced by traffic on I-494, east of the property. i 1 Developer further agrees that ;concurrent with construction of streets and utilities on the property, Developer shall construct said noise barrier according the plans approved by the City. Developer agrees to construct said noise barrier, or to cause said barrier to be constructed, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 9u1 Cardinal Hills (AKA Cardinal Creek 6th Addition) OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN NEW AMERICAN HOMES AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of 1987, by and between Cardinal Creek Village, a Minnesota limited partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Owners," and the City of Eden Prairie, hereinafter referred to as "City:" For and in consideration of, and to induce, City to adopt Ordinance #6-87 changing the zoning of the property owned by Owner from the Rural District to the R1-13.5 District, as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of , 1987, by and between New American Homes, Inc., and City, Owners agree with the City as follows: 1. If New American Homes, Inc., fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner shall not oppose the rezoning of the property to Rural. 2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owners, their successors, heirs, and assigns of the property. 3. If the Owners transfer such property, owners shall obtain an agreement from the transferree requiring that such transferee agree to the terms of the Developer's Agreement. CITY Gary D. Peterson, Mayor auol. Cardinal Hills 4E. (AKA Cardinal Creek 6th Addition) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 87-58 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE 6-87 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 6-87 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 21st day April, 1987; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 6-87, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the.entire text of the Ordinance. shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 6-87 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on April 21, 1987. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Cardinal Hills ( (AKA Cardinal Creek 6th Addition) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 6-87 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:_ Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located north of Cardinal Creek Road, west of I-494, from the Rural District to the R1-13.5 District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective. Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1987. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.) LANG,PAULY&GREGERSON,LTD. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4I06 IDS CENTER AO SOUTH EIGHTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS,.MINNESSOTA 25402 RDRFItt I.LAND TELEPHONE(612)335.0722 RDou A PAULYEDEN PRAIRIE OFFICE t DAVID H.OREOIRSDN SUFIIRRAN NA,IIOI�IAI,-RKIURDP.ROSDW SUITE 370.:. iV! RIE. MARK I:IONNION MOPIANOI IaaDRVE 30REPI1 A.NUN EDEN PRAIE MOVNSIOSA SS3M 30NN M.LANO DIANA P.MASRF (PI31 S3FASS LEA IL De SOU3A REPLY TO WNNFAPOW OPPRL April 3, 1987 Mr. Robert Lambert Director of Community Services Eden Prairie City Offices 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 RE: Proposed Ordinance Regulating the Possession, Service and Consumption of Liquor, Beer. Kegs, Beer and Wine in Public Parks Dear Bob: Enclosed please find the second draft of the Ordinance regu- lating the possession, service and consumption of liquor, beer kegs, beer and wine in public parks. I have exchanged the word "permit" for the word "license" at your suggestion. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me. Very truly yours, LANG, PAULY & GREGERSON, LTD. Attorneys for the City of Eden Prairie By as Masie DPM/ds Enclosure cc: Captain Keith Wall ��C ORDINANCE NO. 14-87 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 9, SECTION 9.04, SURD. 4 RELATING TO PUBLIC PARKS, BY ADOPTING PROVISIONS WHICH REGULATE THE POSSESSION, SERVICE AND CON- SUMPTION OF LIQUOR, BEER KEGS, BEER, AND WINE IN PUBLIC PARKS AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 9.99, WHICH AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Eden Prairie City Code Chapter 9, Section 9.04, Subd. 4.A. shall be and is amended to read as follows: A. [(1)) Serve, possess, or consume any-aieeheiie-beverage-in areas-prehibited-bp-the-Bireeter;-netiee-ef-which-is-pasted-in-sneh areas; (liquor; (2) possess a beer keg or serve or consume beer from a beer keg, unless a permit has been obtained therefore from ( the City; (3) serve, possess or consume beer or wine in that part of Round Lake Park situated north of Valley View Road and in the Flying Cloud Athletic Field, unless a permit has been obtained therefore from the City.] Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty For Violation" and Section 9.99 are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of 1987, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting ( of the City Council of said City on the day of 1987. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor Published in the Eden Praire News on the day of 19 1` _ -2- cip 1 TOoMayor and Council FROMiJohn Frans DATEiApril 16,1987 REiHousinp Revenue Bonds, CBM,$64,000,000 (now called Fountain Place). Resolution 87-90 In December of 1985 the city authorized $64,000,000 in bonds for 800 apartment units on the Cerne property. On may 1,1987 the bonds will have to be called because construction is not underway. The proponent is asking the city to extend the date to November 1,1987 for 129 units at$10,320,000 and 366 units at $29,280,000. The balance of the $64,000,000 will be.called. The bonds will be privately placed. Resolution 87-90 was not available in time to be placed in the packet. We will deliver it to you when it is received. MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Carl J. Jullie FROM: N. J. Swaggert . ,G DATE: April 16,. 1987 SUBJECT: Restructured Employee Benefit Program As follow-up to my memo issued on February 26, 1987, I;am pleased to report that we have concluded the major pieces of our benefit feasibility study and with the help of James'Bissonett & Associates have drafted a proposal for a new and improved employee benefit plan. The restructured program meets our:original objective to maximize benefit coverage without increasing costs and, in fact has resulted in a reduction In cost'to the City as well as an over- all savings to our employees. Attached is a sunmarization of Eden Prairie's present benefit program and the proposed restructured program. Benefit improve- - ments have been highlighted to show increased employee coverage. Also it is important to note that some benefits (health and dental insurance) have decreased in price while others have increased (life and supplemental life insurance). This is a reflection of the changes in the various risk pools and our change in insurance providers. .. To assist you in your review of this proposal a breakdown of the advantages and disadvantages is attached. 1 ADVANTAGES OF RESTRUCTURE A. MEDICAL/HEALTH CARE + Physicians Health Plan and Medcenter will cover all preventative dental for children and adults at 100%. (Under the current PHP, preventative dental is not covered.077-children are covered by GHI and MHP). + Office visits under the new PHP plan will be covered 100%. The current PHP plan calls for a $5.00 charge per visit. Non-emergency use of non-network providers will now require a $300 deductible ($500 deductible under current plan). + Lower direct costs (premiums) to employer and/or employee for both PHP and MHP. B. DENTAL CARE + An indirect cost savings will be achieved through the shifting of costs from the self-funded dental plan to PHP and MedCenter (projected savings: $17,300). The $25,000 which the City Council has allocated annually to the dental reimbursement program can now be reduced to $20,000 and used to provide better/higher benefit levels for basic and major restorative dental expenses and family orthodontia. To encourage efficient use of available dollars the dental reimbursement program will no longer reimburse preventative care expenses for employees who tacle dependent me iEal since these expenses are fully covered for adults and children under the HMO plans. + The Eden Prairie dental reimbursement program will be structured on a basis similar to insured plans, for example: - Basic Restorative: filling, extractions, root canal work and treatment of gum disease -- 80% reimbursement. - Major Services: crowns and inlays, fixed bridgework and dentures - - 80% reimbursement. - Orthodontics: 50% reimbursement; $1,500 lifetime maximum benefit per family member. C. LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE + Currently the City promises to pcoy 50% of the employee's regular base salary to a maximum of $1,500 per month; benefits are payable to age 65 following a 120-day waiting (elimination) period. The ability of the City to pay benefits is dependent upon the following: - The City Council's continued funding. - That no more than 80% of the fund balance will.be paid in benefits. aua f� + Since two long-term claims of $1,500 per month each could result in a liability of $36,000 per year, a question regarding funding adequacy exists. + In addition to funding adequacy concerns, there are a number of other questions which need to be examined and resolved: - Would current benefit levels meet the needs of a disabled employee? - What is the definition of disabled? - Is the City willing to say 'no' to a claimant? - How will the City handle rehabilitation? - What impact would part-time income have on benefits? - How would the City coordinate with benefits payable from Social Security, PERA, and Worker's Compensation? + An insured long-term disability plan will minimize, if not eliminate, the City's potential liability problems which currently exist under the self-insured plan (i.e. eligibility for benefits, benefit amounts, benefit period and discrimination). The "promise to pay" would be based on a contract between the employee and the insurance company, not the employee and the City. D. FLEXIBLE CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT + Increased employee net spendable income through use of a Flexible Contribution Account (FCA). The FCA will provide employees with an opportunity to pay premiums for health insurance and life insurance with pre-tax dollars. DISADVANTAGE OF RESTRUCTURE - Present GHI-covered employees and dependents will be asked to choose either PHP or MHP. (11 employees will be impacted.) - A restructured life insurance plan represents an annual increase of 55,138 over the current plan. Some or all of this increase could be passed on to employees. However, given the City's projected annual savings from the restructured HMO plans the City is in a good position to subsidize the increased cost of the life insurance plan. Initially, the City (per proposal) will subsidize 50% of the increased costs with a gradual reduction in the subsidy over a five year period. 4-16-87 ti { .a * * '(1 = 0 0 'N W .4 ..�-• * t-) m m t,.w m m C > rl m c a rrl y a v v M o 3 (T -+'D r --1 0 m ' 7"0 -I a 'o r-r c: V 0 n r -.o rm y C 0 •C a .-. 'O O 'S'O a O us 'S a ---1 'D Z r..N Z v.••-• 0J • 0 CD 321-4 -rD 0 0 vw 0a < w • 3 a 4. -o- N a '"I " O 04 O 0 CD .p II CD II V O r* N S+ , al 0 CuV m • C r �� • �0 aV) m C 'xr+ -..nr_. * a 0 a D r- s 0 '•'. 0<CO to N C N r •S a fD 0 N W In N of J O•• 1 tT 01 N x 1 0. •_-•GI N a co 00 m m 0 00 0 '< m i x -_ 0 O -. Cua 4^ 4. 0 1 a w m W A 7 n ( 0 CM CoC 7 7 r CD 1 A - a t0 N) O 0 O r-Z n 1 CO ,p CD - CO a a N a . C 0 CD CD -i<� co a m m CD CO MI O W ..+ m N V. a N CO 01 IV N 4" m • A Us 07 IV (Nrl 0 M '-• 1'1 ' w OD 0 7 0 01 V j•.. --I I IN.) C(51 0 CD 0 O. CD --I CD0 '0 O r o, a, ).• z 1 '1 I I 1 •-•'D^- O —O s(41 CD 7 S+ -AZ n . Z N-0 -o > -1 m CD 00!0D =1 2. 'O "7. r- .. O m 0 CD C S2 N =-to.`. r rr 0 >m CS -0 T T 0 O (Do D a ' 0 -I)CI.- 'S n m co v o cD-5 v 0 n C n (D r RI CD 0 J n O a < 'S 7- - (p .D VN .'O O CD I a < 0'••< < 'O 'O • (D N n 0 0 CD 01 A u 0 a •-.. < C0 -...'c N 0 '00 w •-r. .WA .n 3 II w+.--• w r A 'I.. O -5 J N n0 -0 (D w CI'•• I . G') -i a (D (D j a 1-.-.• C .. N r to•O O d •C T m VN O j r r•r a 0.ul< j •-• 0 0 O N CO V) -i H rr. 0 ID O rD O W as O 0 (D r -I Y D• a a 0•• O rt C.T.II .a 0 3 A r N 1'h 50 CO VI .0S C:) • X J C .. n o, O Cs as O --1 ala n J . N O O DI • O '[ m O m n n o • m -o v .n r+ 4" n w a . r- N Li ND a- 7 4• a a t")-0 > CO A VI ...ID _ CO 0 Co 0 0 0 0r ..Z co .0. N O, 0. A (D O, + a a 0 N V (=, -..1 * A V —5~CO co O W co * O A CO O 0 O 0 O .0. A O A A _ 4. MN ... 6•• N .M( .rw• O. tf• I.) �+ N .P IV .A ... N tT .-• O V C:, N W A CO •N-• . O O V !n co A - 0•-- N u1 4* 10 ...ID CI. 0 .. V 1-I w V .--• CO tT 0 0 00 N ..1-.0 - O 0 0 A A 0 A CO Ca CO Ca CO �" • O1 • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager y/ FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services,W" DATE: March 12, 1987. SUBJECT: Willow Park Development Willow Park is a 35 acre parcel located north of Valley View Road, south of Roberts Drive, and east of Mitchell/Baker Road. The majority of this park was acquired through tax forfeiture. The City purchased approximately 2 acres from Edenvale and acquired the wooded hill on the southeast portion through park dedication from Valley View Manor Homes. When Valley View Road was realigned much of the excess fill was placed on a portion of the marshy area of Willow Park to create an active use area for the neighborhood. Addditional fill was placed in conjunction with the Edenvale Apartments construction and later from a project in the vicinity of 101 and Highway 7. The majority of this fill has continued to settle in the marsh over the last four to five years, but has now stabilized to an elevation that can be developed for an active play field and totlot area. Attached to this memo is a copy of the letter to the Willow Park area residents notifying them of the March 16th Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission meeting to hear comments from the residents relating to the proposed development. The Community Services Staff is recommending finish grading and seeding the park during the summer of 1987 and installing the playstructure in the fall of 1987. Additional landscaping, trail construction, and development of a picnic area on the wooded knoll will take place over the next two to four years. The estimated cost for finish grading including the softening of the contours of the square holding pond is $20,000. The estimated cost for the seeding and playstructure is $7,000. The source of the funds for this project is from the cash park fees. This project is included in the Five Year Capital Improvement Program and scheduled for 1987. BL:md • O IV ', Gs I i _ ID \ \ j- \� \ r/ 1A - s I s',i',— 1 i . I ;— I I; multurpose.I { L Stewart �r�\J A . :: : ti t .4 . / r 7 Y• 7 < trsa play-1ara / ;z,. �. -� ( _ \ / — tut, ,\\ �_r_ _ I f It• �. /. V. \ / �' pond /ti .i 11�111 J G ~ II i r�lr I ,„, _ ♦, tiOC, JP. Qp i Vhr , • - ' ' s • .l r v Veil _� l goad Willow Park q ii • UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Apr. 6, 1987 -2- Arvid Schwartz, President of Countryside Investments, was present at the meeting. Mr. Schwartz said that they have several developments in Eden Prairie, the newest being the Tree Farm Subdivision. Cardinal Creek Ridge is located south of Cardinal Creek, north of the Richard Holasek property, east of 494 and west of Baker Road. The site is located on 24 acres and will be divided into 40 single family lots. Schwartz said there is a ridge on the site which will be preserved to the greatest degree possible. This site will be developed at the same time as Cardinal Hills because _ Countryside Investments and New American Homes share a common • access. There are a significant number of trees on the site and the developer plans to replace 3500+ caliper inches of trees. The tree replacement will be done in phases during two seasons of the year and as homes are built. Lambert said the major concerns of this commission are grading and tree replacement. Baker Road will be realigned in the near future and an asphalt trail will be added on one side with a sidewalk on the other side. Lambert said he feels the developer has done a good job of preserving as many trees as possible and he recommends approval of the proposal. Cook said that the staff report states that 22 feet will be cut off the top of the knoll in order to accommodate development. He asked if there were any other possibilities to consider. Lambert said that when there is a ridge of this type, not less than what is being proposed can be done when homes are being built. Baker asked about the problem the developer was having with access to the Miller property. Schwartz said that Mr. Miller doesn't want his land to be developed although they have come to an agreement. Per Mr. Miller's request, the developer is moving his existing house to an adjacent lot and adding a double attached garage. MOTION: Cook moved to recommend approval of Cardinal Creek Ridge per staff recommendation. Gonyea seconded the motion and it passed 7-0. B. Willow Park Development Refer to memo dated March 12, 1987 from Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services and letter dated March 10, 1987 from Bob Lambert to Willow Park Area Residents. Lambert said since there was not a quorum present at the March 16 meeting, no action was taken on this issue. However, several members of the neighborhood were present so the proposal was explained and discussed. The residents are requesting a tennis court be added. Lambert said soil borings will be performed to determine whether this can be done. Grading and seeding would be done this year with the playstructure constructed next year. • • UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Apr. 6, 1987 -3- Baker asked what type of playstructure will be constructed in the park. Lambert said the City has a set of standards that are put in neighborhood parks. Baker asked what age group the playstructure is meant for. Lambert said it would be for kids 7-12 years old. MOTION: Baker moved to recommend acceptance of the Willow Park development per staff recommendation. Shaw seconded the motion and it passed 7-0. VI. REPORTS OF COMMISSIONERS, BOARDS AND STAFF A. Reports of Recreation Supervisor 1. NYSCA - National Youth Sports Coaches Association Lyndell Frey was present at the meeting to explain what the s. NYSCA program is and what the program involves. Frey attended a meeting and was certified the same day after a four hour program. The program involves three different video tapes. r The first tape which is approximately 20 minutes long explains the NYSCA, the second tape which is about two hours long talks about the psychology of coaching and discusses conditioning, weight training, flexibility and warm-up, nutrition and first aid. Tape 3 is a sports specific tape. Training could be held in two segments, either on Monday and Wednesday or Tuesday and Thursday evenings. Cost of the training is $15.00 per person and the coaches receive $300,000 liability coverage, a certified coach patch, official membership card, certification of completion, quarterly newsletter, first aid booklet and corporate discounts from Alamo Car Rental and Days Inn. Frey passed around a copy of the newsletter and added that the $2,000 cost of the videos is picked up by the MPRA. The only expense would be the purchase of a VCR since the Community Center is borrowing one at the present time from the police department. Baker asked how this program will be used compared to what is being done now and how it will be offered. Frey said the program can be offered to those associations who don't have a training program and want something of this type. He added that it would be difficult to make this a mandatory program for coaches. Cook asked if Frey would be responsible for teaching the program. Frey said that Lori Belling would also be certified as of Wednesday. q J • MEMORANDUM CTO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager FROM: Natalie J. Swaggert, Director of Human Resources . SUBJECT: Human Services' Model Consultant DATE: April 17, 1987 At its meeting on Monday, April 13th, the Human Rights and Services Commission voted unanimously to support the selection of Michael Groh as the Human Services' Model consultant. Groh presented his proposal to the Commission at the meeting (a copy of Groh's proposal is attached) and spent a great deal of time answering questions, exploring options and establishing a tentative time frame for the pro- ject. Prior to staff making the recommendation to the commission of Michael Groh as the consultant for this project,the following selection process was used. 1) South Hennepin Human Services Council, Larry Oppold, was contacted for names and recommendations. (He provided M. Groh). 2) Marion Angelica, Metropolitan Council was contacted. He provided two resources, which we investigated. a) Pat Davis, an independent consultant: has not had experience in this area. C b) Rainbow Research-Steve Mayer: This firm has done parts of what we are looking for, but has never done a complete human services model. 11 Mayer did not think this could be done for $6,000 - $8,000. 3) An ad requesting proposals was run in the Eden Prairie News and the Sailor covering Edina, Richfield and Bloomington. One response was received; Greg Jenson, an independent consultant with very little back- ground in Human Services. After concluding the above process the selection of Michael Groh was made on a r' the basis of his broad experience in a wide variety of Human Services areas and his specific background in working with cities in identifying needs and developing methods for delivering human services. At this time it is requested that the Council approve the Human Rights and Services Commissions' recommendation to hire Michael Groh as the consultant to Eden Prairie for the Human Services Model project. It should be noted that the project has been approved and budgeted for as part of the 1987 budget process and that the selection of the consultant is only the first step in the process. A final (more detailed) project proposal will be prepared for Council review once the consultant has had time to work with the Human Rights and Services Commission and the Director of Human Resources. (— go 3 A PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE submitted by Michael Groh, Consultant 2444 37th Avenue S. Minneapolis, MN 55406 (612) 721-7130 -...L.: A. INTRODUCTION The city of Eden Prairie wishes to clarify and better coordinate its efforts in human services for the community. Recent discussions have determined that a human services model -needs to be created and a long range plan developed to guide the model's implementation. The city has decided to utilize an outside consultant to assist in the design and facilitation process. The following objectives and workplan suggest an approach which should meet the city's process and product needs. P. OBJECTIVES 1) To develop, with broad community participation, a human services model tailored to the evolving needs of Eden Prairie. 2) To create a long range/strategic plan so as to make the human services model operational, functional and broadly supported. ) To engender a spirit and concrete examples of community cooperation, coordination and shared ownership in human services. l 9a 9E • • C. WORKPLAN ir Steps Person Responsible By When PHASE I: Getting Organized �c a ccti c,v l x4.4d.,4%7 1) Clarify details, Director of Human 5/87 finalize contrac Resources eav 2) Ori nt conssultann to Direc or of Human 5/87 key people, issues Resources • and government units 3) Conceptualize and Consultant 6/87 design planning Director of Human process and community Resources involvement / -9 HOMAk1.1GI-Ct i�.7'; '•,_ COatn.ttS'Sioki PHASE II: Developing a Human Services Model 4) Initiate a process Consultant 6/87 • involving many com- Director of Human munity people and Resources organizations Add-') Hun.1r\N interested in human / services Cam)) C 5) Convene and lead 41a. 7 Consultant 9/87 event to design an • j,. ideal human services model for Eden Prairie 6) Distribute results of Dr-ettor-of...}{iman 110/87 Step S event and Resources. elicit responses-wool itum tentci(tic t.c t:oi.= r'• I 7) Modify model' based Director of Human 11/87 I- on responses and Resources iiterSeril Consultant c-encernei IO nouldcIL• !ST Colncrr,•ed Cohn,n ut if-L.(Zr.lb, I:. PHASE III: Creating a Plan for Implementing the Model 8) Seek volunteers and Director of Human 12/87 nominations for plan- Resources ' ping team membership 90 9f • 3 • 9) Lead the pl ni team Consultant 2/88 thru a series of plan- ning sessions to - develop strategies, timetables and resources needed to put the human services model in place 10) Distribute draft plan Director of Human T•/BB to all concerned and Resources elicit responses 11) Modify plan based on Director of Human 4/88 responses and present Resources to commissioners for Consultant review and adoption PHASE IV: Formulating Public Policy and Promoting the Results ice) Submit the model and Di•-ectcr a-t 5/88 plan to the City R�� �-as H!�;%.ate Council for review l Fif M�S� �Jf.1 and adoption 17) Publicize new policies Director of Human 6/88 and procedures Resources 14) Hold celebratory and Director of Human 6/88 kickoff event to Resources initiate the model Consultant 15) Provide other consul- Consultant 9/88 tation as needed and requested C. PRODUCTS 1) Ccncept and design memorandum (Ste07.1 2) Human services model design (Step E.) 3) Modified human services model (Step 7) 4) First draft of long range plan (Step 10) 5) Final proposed long range plan (Step 11) • 90 9 4 I• D. COSTS -Up to 80 hours of consultation at $80 per hour $6400 Phase I: $1600 Phase II: $1760 Phase III: $2000 Phase IV: $1040 Administrative support: 24 hours at $11 per hour $264 TOTAL $6664 E. BILLING Consultant will bill monthly, documenting time, activities and dates, unless other arangements are made. F. AUTHORIZATION • * City of Eden Prairie * Consultant 90 9 ff MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services"j DATE: April 15, 1987 SUBJECT: Request Authorization for Funds to Repair Court at Round Lake Park Round Lake Park has 8 tennis courts. The southern 4 were constructed in the mid-1970's; the northern courts in the late 1970's. The southern 4 courts had cracks filled in and were colored coated in approximately 1981. These 8 courts are the main courts for City tennis lessons, high school practice and interscholastic play, and are used more than any other courts in the City. The condition of the courts has deterioriated over the years to the extent that staff is recommending all B courts be covered with a one inch (1") overlay and a new color coat. Repairs should also include filling all of the cracks that have become considerably wider within the last 7-8 months. The southern 4 courts have a crack that is over 1" in width across all 4 ( courts. One of the northern courts has a significant crack running lengthwise up the middle of the court and 2 of the remaining 3 courts have a significant number of minor cracks. The color coat surface of all the courts show considerable pitting. The Community Services Staff had thought that major repair of these 8 courts could wait another year, but after inspection this spring and review of the condition of the courts by an asphalt consultant, the Community Services Staff recommend that repair be done as quickly as possible in 1987. Staff has received bids for simply filling the cracks and color coating, as well as installing a one inch (1") overlay and color coating. An asphalt consultant indicated that cracks would begin showing up within a year if we chose to simply repair the cracks and color coat over the existing surface. He indicated that the overlay and color coating would last 2-3 years before minor cracks would begin to be noticeable. Attached is a copy of the Round Lake Tennis Court Bids. Commission and Councilmembers will note that bids ranged from $34,679-$54,318 for the overlay and color coating. The Community Services Staff request authorization to contract with Plehal Blacktopping for the overlay and color coating of the Round Lake Tennis Courts for an amount not to exceed $34,679. As this item was not included in the 1987 General fund Budget, staff requests the Council authorize funding this project from the City's reserve fund. The y City has an agreement with the School District whereby the District agrees to pay for fifty percent of all major maintenance and repairs of the courts, therefore, the net cost to the city will be $17,339.50. BL:md 11/.( CITY OFFICES/8950 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD/EDEN PRAIRIE.MN 55344-2499/TELEPHONE 16121837-2262 , adMrTir f rzrall7ita ROUND LAKE TENNIS COURT BIDS Asphalt & Color Coat Color Coating C & H Construction $35,706.00 $11,126.40 Barber Construction 45,256.00 16,333.00 T. A. Schifsky & Sons 45,580.00 16,940.00 Sjostrom, Inc. no bid 13,223.00 Midwest Asphalt 39,916.00 12,900.00 H. I.. Johnson 43,000.00 14,860.00 Plehal Blacktopping 34,679.00 10,679.00 Bituminous Roadways 54,318.00 15,445.00 Plehal Blacktopping $34,679 t Bids range from $34,679-54,318 for overlay & color coating $10,679-16,940 for color coating r"I l tr.' CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 87-98 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID FOR 1987 SEAL COATING WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following improvement: I.C. 52-113, 1987 Seal Coating bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received are shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends award of Contract to Allied Blacktop Co., Inc. as the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a Contract with Allied Blacktop Co., Inc. in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of 5121,898.15 in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 21, 1987. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: Rodney W. Rue, Design Engineer f14-) DATE: April 16, 1987 SUBJECT: Summary of Bids for Improvement Contract 52-113 (1987 Bituminous Seal Coating) Sealed bids were received at 10:OD A.M. on Thursday, April 16, 1987, for the, above referenced improvement. Three bids were received and are tabulated as follows: BID TOTAL r BIDDER SECURITY BID AMOUNT C._ Allied Blacktop Co., Inc. 5% $121,8913.15 Buffalo Bituminous 5% 5128,975.89 Bituminous Roadways 5% $136,534.80 The budget for seal coating is approximately $125,000.00. Our intention is to increase the project in order to maximize the seal coating area and still remain within budget. Recommend award of Improvement Contract 52-113 to Allied Blacktop Co., Inc. in the amount of $121,B98.15. RWR:ss