Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 11/04/1986TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1986 COUNCIL MEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL 8:00 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BOARDROOM Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock, and Paul Redpath City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Planning Director Chris Enger, Director of Community Services Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. MINUTES A. Special City Council Meeting held Thursday, September 18 1986 B. Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday, September 23 1986 C. Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, October 7 1986 III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List B. Set Joint City Council/School Board Meeting for Tuesday, 6:00 PM November 25 1986 at the School Administration Boardroom C. PRAIRIE LUTHERAN CHURCH by Adkins Association. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 46-86, Zoning District Change from R1-22 to Public on 10.97 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Prairie Lutheran Church; and Adoption of Resolution No. 86- 253, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 46-96 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 10.97 acres into one lot for construction of a church. Location: South of Pioneer Trail, north of Blossom Road, and east of Bennett Place (Ordinance No. 46-86 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 86-253 - Authorizing Summary and Publication) D. WESTON BAY by the Pemtom Company. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 51-86, Zoning District Change from RM-6.5 to R1-13.5; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Weston Bay; and Adoption of Resolution No. 86-274, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 51-86, and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 13.5 acres into 24 single family lots and one outlot. Location: South and east of Mitchell Lake, west of Timber Lakes Drive (Ordinance No. 51-86 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 86-274 - Authorizing Summary and Publication) Page 2639 Page 2664 Page 2668 Page 2687 Page 2688 Page 2694 City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,November 4, 1986 E. MWCC Permit Application for Riverview Drive Sanitary Sewer, I.C. TF:Itif (Resolution No. 86-275 F. Easement agreement for temporary construction of Dell Road at Townline Road (through a corner of proposed Tom Thumb parking lot) G. Final Plat 1E22%221 of Weston Bay (south end of Timber Lakes allyea, west side) Resolution No. 86-276 H. Final Plat approval of American Lutheran Church Addition (north of CSAH 1 and west of Bennett Place) Resolution No. 86-263 I. Final Plat approval of Wilson Ridge Learning Center (northeast corner of Prairie Center Drive and Valley View Road) Resolution N57—g-278 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. SHADY OAK RIDGE 2ND ADDITION by Joseph Ruzic. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.4 acres and Preliminary Plat of 7.6 acres into 11 single family lots and one outlot with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals & Adjustments. Location: West of Old Shady Oak Road, north of Rowland Road (Ordinance No. 54-86 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 86-271 - Preliminary Plat) B. SUPERAMERICA by SuperAmerica Stations, Inc. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Fire Station to Neighborhood Commercial on 1.06 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to Highway Commercial on 0.38 acres and Zoning District Amendment within the Highway Commercial District on 0.68 acres, with Preliminary Plat of 1.06 acres into one lot and one outlet. Location: East of Highway #169, north of County Road No. 1, west of Pioneer Trail (Resolution No. No. 86-272 - Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; Ordinance No. 55-86 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 86-273 - Preliminary Plat) C. TECHNOLOGY PARK 7TH by Technology Park Associates. Request for Zoning District Amendment within the Office District on 3.74 acres for construction of 27,700 square foot office building. Location: East of future Golden Triangle Drive, north of Nine Mile Creek (Ordinance No. 56-86 - Amending Ordinance No. 36-85 within the Office District) V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS VII. PETITIONS REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Proposed NSP Transmission Line along Highway 5 (Continued from from October 7, 1986) VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS A. Report of City Administrative Offices Committee Page 2701 ' Page 2702 Page 2705 Page 2708 Page 2711 Page 2714 Page 2728 - 3 - It. APPOINTMENTS X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS BOARDS & COMMISSIONS Reports Of Council Members Report, of City Manager, Report of City Attorney Report of Director of Community Services Report of Director of Public Works 1. Award Contract for Catch Basin Cleaning Machine WiTolution • XI. NEW BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 1986 7:30 PM,'SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BOARDROOM COUNCIL MEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock, and Paul Redpath City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, Direc- tor of Community Services Robert Lambert, and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson ROLL CALL: Councilmember Pidcock was absent. Mayor Peterson stated this Special Meeting of the City Council was set to allow a Public Meeting in order to provide information on the action taken by the Council on August 19th allowing a limited program of goose hunting at Olympic Hills golf course as a means of goose population control. He reviewed the action taken by the Council at that meeting and noted that this meeting had been set as a Special Council meeting so that the Council could also take action if the decision is made to do so. He also reviewed some of the reaction from the community regarding the proposed hunt. Peterson introduced Police Chief Walls, Captain Jim Clark, Jon Parker from the D.N.R. and Mari Smaby, University of Minnesota Research Assistant. David Van House, attorney for Olympic Hills, reviewed the request made by Olympic Hills for the goose control program. Jon Parker, Area Wildlife Manager for the D.N.R., said that they were involved in this issue because they respond to people who have nuis- ance problems with wildlife and Olympic Hills had reported their problem with the geese. He said the goose hunt had been proposed as an immediate method of control because it takes a year's lead time to begin a trap and transplant program. He reviewed some of the prob- lems with the trap and transplant program and outlined other possible means of goose population control. He said they are interested in determining the effectiveness of hunting as a means of providing control at a lower cost than trap and transplant. Mari Smaby, University of Minnesota Research Assistant, said that she was present to provide information on the methods of goose control 26,t3 City Council Minutes -2- September 18, 1986 used by the University. She said the cost for trapping is about $1,000 per trapping. Redpath asked Parker if it was correct that the D.N.R. would like to see the results of a hunt because it has never been tried before. Parker replied they would like to see if the population can be con- trolled through hunting. Anderson said he thought Dr. Cooper also wanted to keep records on the effectiveness of the hunt. He asked why the hunting limit in this area is two while in other areas it is one. Parker said this limit is part of their response to areas that are experiencing prob- lems. Parker also said that Dr. Cooper had trapped and banded the geese here so that he could monitor the success of the hunt if it occurred. He noted, however, that the University does not take a position on this sort of thing. Bentley asked how many geese had been banded at Olympic Hills. Smaby responded that 140 adults and young had been banded which she said would represent the local breeding population. Parker noted that trapping can only be done for three or four weeks in the summer when the adults are flightless and the young can't fly yet. Mrs. Ted Finholt, 10010 Pioneer Trail, said she thought Eden Prairie had been ridiculed in the metropolitan area because of the quick de- cision to dispense with the geese. She said she talked to Dr. Cooper who said that he himself heartily disapproved of the hunt. She said she thought the Council had acted hastily and, further, that Dr. Cooper said, in his opinion, the Council should have realized the sensitivity of the problem. She said she was here to reprimand the Council for their approval of the hunt. Mary Radcliffe and Larry Kapustka, 9303 Franlo Road, distributed material outlining non-lethal alternatives to the proposed goose hunt at Olympic Hills. (Attachment A) Kapustka said they are here to ask the Council to reconsider their decision of August 19th. He said he understood the problems of the golf course but he questioned the effectiveness of such a hunt. He said he was concerned about this one-time hunt setting a precedent for future years or for other locations in the City. He said the hunt would cause an extra burden on Public Safety. Radcliffe reviewed the material handed out on non-lethal alternatives and related the means used by other areas to control the goose popula- tion. City Council Minutes -3- September 18, 1986 Heidi Morgel, 9146 Fox Run Circle, reviewed some letters she had received in response to her interview published in the newspaper. Tom Bierman, 9160 Flyway Circle, said he thought the golf course had done a very professional job in promoting the goose hunt. He said, however, there were five residents on his street alone who were opposed to the hunt. He said he thought there should have been an environmental impact statement done on the effect on other wild- life in the marsh area. He said he thought allowing one shoot was setting a dangerous precedent. He said he thought the Council should be aware of their image to the residents by allowing this shoot to occur. He asked the Council to look at different alternatives. Redpath said any taxpayer is allowed to petition or request the Council to solve a problem and Olympic Hills had done that with the goose problem. He said the Council had determined that an informa- tional meeting was necessary to rectify the numerous misconceptions about the hunt. Sharon Ciatti, 17795 South Shore Lane, presented a petition she said contained 337 signatures of persons who were against the hunt on Olympic Hills. (Attachment B) She said she was concerned with the safety issue, particularly for the Public Safety officers. She was also concerned about the problems of public liability in this case and about the issue of precedent. Bentley said that, regarding the issue of precedent, the Council when it first voted on the issue said that this was not a precedent- setting situation and that it would not occur again anywhere else in the City. He said he would like to hear from Public Safety on the issue. Chief Wall said that Public Safety had been directed by the Council to look into the feasibility of issuing permits but that none had been issued to date. He said that Public Safety has not taken a stand one way or the other on the goose control issue. He said they have been at Olympic Hills to measure distances for the proposed shoot. Captain Clark reviewed the area proposed for the hunt and the dis- tances of the blinds from the residences in all directions. He said they were concerned with the safety issue and pressed the manufac- turers of shotgun shells for more information on the distance shells would travel. He said they had received an answer from the manufac- turer about the type of shells proposed for this shoot which said the maximum distance the shell could travel is 920 feet. He said he was not sure the shot would go that far but that they were concerned about the possible safety hazards if an error in the direction of the shooting were to occur. I • City Council Minutes -4- September 18, 1986 Gus Benakis, president of Olympic Hills, presented a statement in which he said that Olympic Hills has never wanted to be treated dif- ferently from the other landowners and that they consider themselves a taxpayer just like anyone else. He said, in order not to cause any problems, Olympic Hills would withdraw the request for the permit to shoot the geese. He said they would return to request a permit to trap and transplant the geese with the help of the D.N.R. He also said that they would cover the cost of the trapping procedure. Robert Krueger, 9090 Neill Lake Road, said he thought the hunting would have set a bad example for the young people in the community. Terry Johnson, 15020 Ironwood Court, suggested that everyone should give ideas to Olympic Hills for controlling the goose population. MOTION: Redpath moved to rescind the previous action by the Council to allow the hunting of geese at Olympic Hills. The consensus was that no such motion was needed because the request had been withdrawn. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Marlene Morgel, 9146 Fox Run Circle, said that she was concerned that the request would be brought up again at some point in the future. She reviewed in detail the actions she had taken during the time since the goose hunt was announced. Peterson noted that, while the decision had been made in good con- science at the time it was made, he believed more public input should have been solicited. He said, however, since the request has been withdrawn, it is not necessary to continue to criticize the golf course or the Council for their previous actions. Sheldon Mayer, 9150 Flyway Circle, said he thought the Council had the responsibility to allow a public forum on the issue and they had not done that. Bentley noted that the petition was presented the night the request was made; therefore, it was not possible to thoroughly check the petition. He said further, that Council decisions are not made based on a petition presented to the Council and that a petition request does not require a public forum. He said, while it would probably have been wise in this case to have noticed the surrounding residents on the request and petition, it would not be possible to follow that procedure for all petitions presented to the Council. He said he thought we had learned that similar situations regarding such vola- tile issues should be dealt with by a public forum but that this one was no longer in question. Peterson said he thought the cause had been served and concerns had been adequately addressed. "MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adjourn the meeting at 9:25 PM. Weathermeasure Corp. P.O. Box 41257 Sacramento, CA. 95841 916-481-7565 ATTACHMENT A Non-lethal alternatives to the proposed goose hunt at Olympic Hills. Resear ch._ National Humane Society Guy Hodge--Director of Data and Information N.H.S. Wash. D.C. Professor of Wildlife Biology 16 yrs. experience and a consultant to the National Geographic Society. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture--New York State Jim Forbes--Federal Biologist and State Director of USDA Nuisance Birds and Animals U.S. Dept. of Agriculture--State of Minnesota Richard Wetzel --State Director of Animal and Pest Control Alternatives: physical barriers/fences need only be 18-24 inches high, can be hidden by planting hedges. inhibit geese from walking to grass from ponds, which they favor. Netting-to restrict the geese from ponds and pools. available from: Internet, Inc. 2730 Nevada Ave. No. Minneapolis, MN. 541-9690 Re ellents/friahtening devices Conwed Corp. :nestles Div. St. Paul, MN. 221-1260 red helium balloons, keep geese from feeding/resting on lawns. available from: Raven Industries, Inc. P.O. Box 1007 Souix Falls, SD 57117 605-336-2750 shellcrackers--the loud noises will cause the geese to disperse. available from: Marshall Hyde, Inc. Port Huron, MI 48060 Stoneco CO., Inc. 5403 Federal Blvd. Denver, COLO. 80221 Sutton Ag. Enterprises, Inc. 538 BrUnken Ave. #7--Salinas, CA 93901 Flags--usually the least expensive and most effective tool- waterfowl perceive the flags to be predators, such as hawks. alternative ground covers near the waters edge- periwinkle, pachysandra and euonymus eliminate nesting sites such as islands or penninsulas in ponds. Hunting waterfowl is ineffective, because the geese not killed during the hunting season will return the following spring and - raise their young, other birds migrate in from area lakes:etc._ and soon fill the void left by the geese killed in the preA*4s The cycle will continue unless pest management techniges .are .aPplied consistently. P. O. BOX 97 ALBANY, NEU YORK 1 2201 -OFFICE OF ANIMAL DAMAGE CONTROL ,26LIG Here are some suggestions for moving the birds: Discontinue Feeding In many instances, a major attraction to geese is the supplemental food offered by people to attract and hold birds. If geese are a problem, all feeding should be discontinued to force the birds to revert to natural foo.ds, which in most instances, means they will move elsewhere. Nuisance goose control techniques will not work in areas where goose feeding is allowed t , continue. Dimtn.ishing_Attractive_Factors Geese are grazers. They normally feed on short, green succulent grass. Geese are discouraged from using areas where grass is allowed to grow long. Do not mow grass along water bodies as this encourages new growth which attracts geese. Vegetation, such as grases along the water's edge, can be changed to less desirable ground cover plants. Alternative ground covers which are unattractive to geese, include pachysandra, periwinkle, and euonymus. Do not create small islands or peninsulas in ponds as they provide good nesting sites for geese. If they exist, consider changes to make these areas unavailable to the birds. Build Fences Instead of flying, geese normally walk between ponds and feeding areas. This habit can be used to advantage in keeping geese off lawns and swimming pools. To be effective fences need be only 16" to 24" tall. Chicken wire fencing of 11" to 2" mesh is very durable and will last years. Less expen- sive fencing of plastic and nylon is available. To be effective the entire area to be protected must be completely fenced. Fence posts of 2" x 2" wood, 3/8" aluminum rod or 1" metal electrical conduit are adequate. Fences may be beautified or hidden by planting hedges of boxwood or privet. Use Balloons Geese are difficult to trap because they usually refuse to enter or even walk under objects overhead. This trait can be used to the homeowner's advantage. Geese will not linger under a helium filled balloon. Large balloons, 30 inches in diameter, filled with helium, and tethered on a 40-50 foot monofilament fishing line of 50-75 pound test, will keep geese from feeding, loafing, and resting on lawns. Dischar ,e Shellcraekers Shellcrackers are special shells fired from a 12-gauge shotgun to project a firecracker up to 75 yards and the noise will disperse birds. Using these shells when geese first come into an area can effectively persuade them to go elsewhere. These shells, used in conjunction with balloons, will enhance their effectiveness. Be aware, however, that a permit may be required for discharging firearms. Geese may also be moved using whistle bombs and noise bombs. These devices have a shorter range - 25 yards. The bombs are fired from an inexpen- sive 15 mm launcher (flare pistol) eliminating the need for a shotgun. Prevent liesting Goose numbers may be reduced if the homeowner sill prevent the geese from nesting on his pond. In New York, geese generally begin nesting from mid-March through mid-April. The first step is to locate the nest. Look for the male. He will usually be seen swirming in water within 25 to 50 yards of the female and nest. If you see the male, the female is nearby. She will be motionless on the nest and more difficult to spot. It is helpful to know that geese rarely nest on shore and almost always nest on islands, muskratst houses, old stumps, floating plat- forms or other objects out away from the mainlAnd shoreline. When the nest is located it will do no good to simply break the eggs and destroy the nest. The goose will simply build a new nest and lay more eggs. She can repeat this renesting up to four or five times. Upon locating the nest, remove one half of the eggs. Place the eggs in a plastic bag. Place the bag with eggs in a home freezer. The next day return the frozen eggs to the nest and remove the remaining eggs and repeat the freez- ing process. Also, return the second batch of eggs to the nest. This should be done after all eggs have been laid (geese usually lay 10 to 12 eggs), but before the goose has begun incubation. Using this technique the goose will not renest, the eggs will net hatch, and goose production will stop. Important: Canada_geese_are_protected by the International Migratory_Bird Treaty. Act. It is the illewal to disturb g2ose nests or freeze eggs without a permit. Permits may be obtained by contacting_your local State Animal Damage Control Office, U. S. Department of Agriculture. Revised May 1966 ATTACHMENT B The people who have si gned below are a g ainst shootin g the Canadian Geese on Olympic Hills Golf Course as a means of controllin g them. NAME ADDRESS PHONE I. ....74'., A2477,„peZ AZA... '7 7/ A - ,2-ialete.e,k, 9'1</-d.,10 .i.2 ,>.4—.7 1-7 /J ,':',-. ' 9 4/(-/e J-1 - -Cli.-„.. L:-Z-, 6 /..‘' r , -- ..._. 7 ,.,/7-./,7:,---- my3 . • "/ C)2:: / )5 0- PO:U-1 (1.-71 . /) ./, ;•'. .-a-cie,-- WA . 1.364&-- /Oaf y' ,...j=7 //ce,..s- X/ 2.1.ziZa ti _ / / 11(4teA a/f4 OM/ ((ICI cA.e-c/ /555G d'4.4(41,0 JW9/44,.. Pv.`/. &tdd44d.. e ;90c CLe 1- \)/ A7/57 -7 irs- Y.? ci&) 7 / 4 g 90 w ..,45„,--C T _ 93-j yy.; -/Ket`75747'-/ _ //5-W k;<:. -614.c 9</./ - &CZ, I q00- 3Ool 937— /63V ).- cr) The people who have signed below are against shooting the Canadian Geese on Olympic Hills Golf Course as a means of controlling them. 02 PHONE 3 NAME 2c3 / ADDRESS P"Li (.1/7 fa ),//a.q/n ii)ceakOf\ac 7.1:16 ZU'el itt,?' 71/ 9 7 H37,/ /3/4.4...) JfIth.cy -- %/4--40crit)/A t; 9(,,,,_ 73 ci'qq . b3..L/ „,„•,J9,2_ .7.4 ,e)) 9; 7 /ef .il,' ite(---- 7=izz/e4it krs PKw v *4 -,C .4; it ,,1 ,.: / . 1 -2e. C-1 C4-cl (11 '71,12.il 'e 'i /TOV,Litlyt4166L, 1 17110a51 .Sg-(fi 1 - .>7 3.L.----1:-,:.:(24,L . =2 'ii,:tC/1,Lk ,' 1/, t -71 7S- -.I: 4 . /1 i.L isty- / 3 C. /0 co4;--1Z 5 (1-‘,..- Air ' , . 'I: ". ; _ C /.)-1-1 1-,./-Li...0 0_,....-L /./d,7tize ,C/;f-d,-6:4 A-: Z.1".*2 --itt,evii Dr. - ....2 Er, 1,..,,A, ..e INN /4. ,-•>r n f-tACVA a:,\`,1)(,) tai% Fn cn,,,Y n A_A:\ -Ix . /1, L , 4_4(} 1 e.etzekX-., n..- `7.37,:iz. /3.7c, 0 93. - e o c53.4 -cs-A 914f -'1VCI cl (//- 53c 99Y- cki .'" gt„,-1 9 aiwr g;-.7 7elf- 93q -52.9 F 3 tt 5. \JE. vnthrs i styli/ ) ("Ls i tryt's OPro ri&2-t. are. a3 et.iets 4- +1% frof osld 5 hoc-fir-I Df 6-ust fOr eurposts p op u Icx.+1 or\ c_orti r o 1 cd 01.61 01p i tls GOUrSe. A /ADD tikEsC J P HoN4 Ahm, 8E 0,- 3/ L 7 ///71 a;diad-44". 9W-750) 471 ft6144ezoeleie*.c Zie/ T; II ?wt4,4-1., :3a A) Ii.64,6 IL 44 L- Cr Lhila 64-uijeA /‘:, Fr/ Pr -t 2-D P/bt 245-r.sivo. /T5 O-Ji4(171 21 ME.1.o0y CT .2 2. O3 4.2 " V 4.7 'e-7-Z.<-'1 of le;'" • C?j81:44.1c-Ati ts'.67ci barrel q4-1 )4tA__ /atria deir, Iv/ 2/ $4ovsAjaiaT? 3 (01 Vbe dithAC,( 7.r (1-14/(3 I L4991 9341 -176 1 cod C. — 6,-a" 1.4 50. 45 .21) We/-.34/0 V7- i ei,37-)5-Co 461 -616s 7. 4/ No ri 9 ‹./ fr. -y tile who hove 5/9nect be/ow,-woni. fhe '- heeciks5 Slacighire oi iite Can actibh 3eese alvmpit golF nePrerA0 4AaKe placr./ odd re • 1111M1-1--er /eie75; arie 0-• edic • 44- (V # /0 .1"-y , m°44. ouge 4sLuct 44 _16 tt 11 1° 10 Riu% C";411 *age 7-4,44/, qyq _3 -/ e. • .4‹.• 9 . - 4/ .1 9 I /.1-? ) 1:7.Y q(1 3 3 ZE „ - , 1,, & ritt /Leo , It A). !Aft -11-•‘,.. ...huo4 -c c:lo_t .- TV. A :: ,.k., C:!%, 4.,,tAvt e'l"...f s,r......, • \9 4i i -,j cc _i ..i,-(7s,-,-,‘ 9 ire rol , et--- c-a, (L ...x....k ' ) 9-s:)/.1, . k 61,4_04_ 7ga Ld, ,g_(...u..,d-r.4.1_, `ft) N. Cit-,,,.--, 3, 1:: 1 k, , w .._1., I , .„... 0,..if.,--/' --i. - 1 •...,. , ... _ . Pailvo '`f fi.y„ la, C.,. 945,' 3 A 1-(4,0 )21 47 2 3 lb V A I2,1 .1 4 1i - f,!m ) 99:y - 79-le - 3q40 671-g1/"°1 1- -I'OiCS1 Y1 -56't 71. 07/ ht. LI :z :5' irPs l . et(CI ,) b , 64V674I1 N4ec1./4A1*O ,y. No Co(P - I o3(eri -.\---ccetiteci-J Of- gcau,,,, 444 itry .1-... 7 j - 7/ z) •Pit-5-570 q 4 t -Tgro 994/-6 3 I in I I oft r • I I I I I • • • • Al • a I 1 +A, I anItu. ei7‘ ••74. ay,x47, /,,357 / ?D Fax-ez„1 ewy e(e, /a2s-1 a-4 7T-5-- 17T S? /33B af,ãi 16D-0D-9‘ r-17)4. AU& e/igez"-- 9 vie -94f7 rit-e. "ik 2 2/Zr 4"4 /1---3 -fraud /5 /-0 c/4J/ 43 i 4113 1 e0 1)1/-4-14 c 611ii /oao sh. cfr 01/ 645S -13._6 (4-cA : /Y7d 7 1/e,lkey-- A7/5- si I ,Apl 1,1c: 1176 Mict e -o- 60z. u.v ctk at ck , 7 '7 7SgS etC'f\ (/irtL, • 1. (f.53?) g 7Y/ ?? /1/ - 74.0 57.5/4/ '?./14* -1(25/g cr(t/-77,0 74//` re27 7 ' CillAID/7.0 4.•• 42 /0 9— -OA If it q -sr.43 70 4 •9'4/4/-07. -N2A c •%`,\'‘• 2/tint_, jz55 P7 // G<:"J ?,‘"r‘' ctrr . • „ _ 6.91rOttrivaiii-N- : 53 •3.3"" 4 C-7/1.4-1 3 .Ze.f.AtLc -79 /q<../g 44.A.4 -`6 -41/ L"gil:4(.& 7 -963; 507 -Arl-fk. 9,37 /be 2 „9„1 1 4„..c-k cjr , .? obt. plcick A4 git-rattruw The people who have signed below, are against shooting the Canadian Geese on Olympic Hills Golf Course as a means of controlling them. NAME ADDRESS PHONE 9./&-e)ie •z-,.,c..zixt) 9 P-45 4,-e.,_/.z Ce ' - /j" /o4,36 vy./- 9/1 — 7S-7 7 -67/57 _ '1X-1441.) da,tesx 146kt) Pi 41W) & MI07 Fd 744,0.5 JAk einckev,ot)x 54:yaks- (4,„,„vz Ed eklotywi OtkOtokWa r.D .r. 93V - 9 (/73 9(14 - 1 111 - wo.ku tmciam't5n r dt".+5 4 CA" PrO.Z.rie Ct.rt 0,5Ct:trtS+a. ervrosid slop-king c3a.cra od- OLI peicNilts-GolcCoost. cor fur/4st oc For via/loll coni co/ • • Ap& 4°3 5 /7S14.4 " a q is-ztv 0+,6ed: _cio-4 .1itteo-7,14.4.91-y 61, 6ro c4A, Taw/ (52Cair.x,7 O 6J' <4.4 \ e55443 CP LY.Aikleirp Zr-Forncatir f t 137- etn—ick-to I 1.1 1 5 NOcSas--- 934 a '1,k D„ 93q- (7y e_ Pq.17 6,2 (44ke-tieloi( 73if 613 2_ asedifrAY ii'etrLi/d6tt ,Z,(,4 :/67; 0 Se a ,c6 e(! 'DI - 93 7 - /7..5-0 0 3441,44,a 1:3K-ce(3 . , .7.2 ,i ect,44,4 1) ? r ? r tender-72v?0,h7ep tse, et 3? /374v.4.4gegici 930:39)3 3tqo i. 10 /2. .1,, ,4:g VAL 2/-St 1)12 /3 PILO& 6diimeh lett criAlZigilt 95t1-777 f 937- f6V3 f7.-f (7537 3 2-276. e e e ictE AtqytilittA 7A- GAAkile, _ vit +ht, V not (r5rqcirQ.s,6164.1-fs oc aet 425e44vs4 4ha, (top 054d .sApo-brI5 Ctere vai- 1.44 "vit. klas Go M covrs t. --fb r 4 pDpvleal ern rwtevrtrol ( -) I O() 114"<<" .2 3 l% JO - I I - w (,7,4712),t-)- — 15 i36-1;1444fiezoi 117 hkailzi.,/ 14 I 4's /4/ / _ „ /2 L / c 1V/3 01111rr2k; pr,z LC i 2 c c /9 ,2ILLT YleintUrNik:;ACAL 7'LLST-6(scintidi . Api d .52 e c2q- iojaviei 404/4 ' 151-to 7 2--Y 3‘71 -7?41 1 c1 37. 7.1 ( It QV(' 73tf-e633 931-113s- 9..1 It p 1).1,tv. -cim.ty:atv V-VW37ow ex LA 9 `-ikilt 1 15146 6t43-6-'"4; Ct ‘4 7-0 1 e/frd // • 7'j -' fLt/4.7- At 4 frtZttk/4-- 74)/ nea•41"4. 1 /40 4,,th'Vk ‘#Ji_‘70il 4444 :" I " Clor Pn4U4S,f1-41.4tit 11*.3 t)q Ilect feu) " ( wz -461 tivvic,r4,7 nid re/,,* .F 6/..,fret.;ri L , // aAre a5cALtIvi- -Ma r27posad 511004;,), di 34.Q.SV 64- 0 1.,,7 rn joy:n C PA G CdP G a wrse, 4Dr 4 Act tvrettS1 of' poptd ed; 0 r) c 0 A9 11 , 1 . . . ' 11 n 1 ../e....,„..„ A M 44.6a.......Le 1, P K 65- _____---..---...- ( I 44„„t( r7„..4„„tx, ,,r2...r 4.,,emvecr #9,4, 75+4. ype7 2 P; edV 4114,k)1 i 930 t)61AltPit )›; 934/ ,.2 523 ( 3 , F 4 ri • I • b85149L -kiiKr_0\34-0 1±9 , i Put&11-1 ,N1ciran 3790 vilimi f,igta i , q3(-1-)3(tis- 5 w......_ R..,_.,-„,-,_, 16/1/ avtl Aim,sz 717-1.d '.t"-- L n5-47 ICN,),J,wyzio : 9?e-/-6 icf" 1 r9/4- 5A1\)951110411tt :! ciLi-rr 5+0 4ftit:9‘,_.- /q03/ r4t-if Pr.441 ,f3f., Ov/ 01 ....„_.."..9‘30..„..y : 9 b-1.-..-aca /0 .11%•/•#•.etA...N1116-84L 1- - 0:_at'' 01_,,),i444•""' n ' C ..1 " a-atZ P- VVI t C )5 `n_1(:ii,a, &YAW 1 -1 1 W lri 5+. Cf3L4- 3 (i 4 .._ c_ I I ,)., t, R. s',441-4-1- (c't.'-'`'' '1.6- ri)".1 iiik I 15 /2) ; ;,11-.;...;73-- ,)"4, 71 7 C IL":,;(4,,:,e;"1 c , /r / 0,_ 4-- . cl_3 7- 2V - (._ Da../\ ck-k4kArN c131 '\ ck3x-t GT? 1 r1,(0(t; An? q (036 a a 1 7 GaY c13 44 -1,101/4> and.444,„, /74g4 S. StiL 417 -0s79 gl,T1 - • Ifsle vv,olkirs ras n c/kA ts P c, -r(1 az) Ct.c.sn 5 4- p (1 0.sa.01 slorp."1,-1 1 °rv c c;or evcr03(1. oc fOetActinno call-fro I 9.30-62s--4 93V-5,94 ,37-C 77C 9351 6 74X cnti - 6') 7/ SS r 47.2orde4f.4,2, sower c,„ 01/4tex- Lu.t.e.t /76v/ eds., PkagroUtill slea 2 4/Py-',Cle-tA' /7(47 e.e.a.,-"Ace C. e V 5- - AVON CA4le'r 6. '7 • _ • 1- 67 7/Z5/tott l fc-..%,..: (D • \%.0.\\CL , ..\\S 4tict / i 11An Ote,t0toti/Lo ll 'Itt-creid Y , 'Y ( 7/e/8 itiot-re/ei L "2-c-/A--a-irtAdc- /178T5 Liv UAL-( 3 o. /* ILI /NT v nu/ L/V LANZ _ f5 alit MY 6testki /-41Je• I t, 71 7/74 Ale 6ti4t- . 1 f? ,)s r : L_ . ,K41#4 ( / 7 7 e,C .S, S k L. 1.1/ i.; i :.,...,,,,&,- &ii.icitica,.Ay ./774Z, 5 .c4 (_. )41 .1' _A i.:*11-.f6 - 2,(A.):/--. 1 ' p-o z r;-,,,X -4 L_/n:4:4 -- /77/9 s- s- sil-e441 7//3 frfweAr/ezio r 937-z/r 3 151 - MY 7 93q-.5z.i5 ?3( _ 329.7 934 -0419 7341-/047 934-1273 93Y--.2 soy 13 4- VS7 It '3 3 •7,c/g ;;ZG,C .;6 .13.L.•-re,;‘-t4 cL ./.j 1 2 , 2(57 'Pe:14a-- 2&' .-1711 <.;?..S., • 16 /41.• 4-4/L 14"/ •-)e •-,• i • • • 902) 19.2e0,0 acAll e. p, / (,i) LT NOME 1-10 ).•,*(nvIde2 c1 IAA vrvikrii9 had rasida.r0 ,5 coical eret.r.4 air& a...5c&Lvvri. 41-9, proeoSa 5i,00lin5 a; 50,444.. ce-+ 014 c. goic covnu cor - v reoszs DC eoplod I cars'i.rol P I 7 M-Var--L_ :/j, \ I 1 P 6c6/6: Atitz(1,:sefi , , 71 1 ---.,?- "/ ,,d.:(Jz._. /6 7‘Y7:-.7 4._'.: 7 A-4 )(A...L. Gii%-,;(14.00., igi i ?J 7-f337 1 1-1...,..,:‘./ 3 7 -CS'093 f D AIAA / cl tt - ts 1 A c_.... / 39 b 0 Cies,4J &:7- aFOT rl 64W.4 u c aczat 0173 reittdayer. 13V-1.27 7 12 To th e t+ CO- gi r41741,4 I >t)e 0 oil•eseetie& ?Pi ' S — ) a s- 1 3 ni/c....-2.0m4. tit 44,t Lft.tur.Zit at 44 --7 4 c4 3 rf 15 ,e 4 Yo I 14)ifsox— X oy.4_4. ..4.4...."4 ;25;1_5cerelU.3:11 937- OK.? IL -1-7,06- CottAL &I.-4-'1/Z:c.:,-) 11 .(.41/A-tee-dj tie.- /4:0;Aie. ti A f'7 5•- 2 , , 8 lifer/Ie4,. /l y-eys3-- z ›,0 T &lc; aNtni , crq - ocAo ( e,t;f7,11../zii-Alo 6 7/4 ,Z/47aiteezeei , 95c/,,pc 7 .2.3 4-Thy al4e2ZE„,- (7,117 - 7 7 766E Sur-40., TeKreksa_ ,3 (t —75 °6 44:64,4_ ).c•ry:let-LT -xv6 mf;;\&,,,t5 Cy - 1L 0.3re, Octcuk.4._ CrijSL- CL-6: L\ Q,ceiz,w^Se rç Tclacek.i_-)r) umy-T-Vrol AcUress /cozo • /06-, eiv(e /60,/, fr,12/a;ies/ froei/ 9.4Ly( , , 3s' 6.1 71-y44.... ILtA011€ CkaTu...t 7 r IC-11-5...'ecifr Y AiLc -2(,35 bit ,112.1:1a,t; n_ /0 0.04.az royd pavi. , , , 7)/Q137/A/ Mcizo.A/ con Pre...wve_ 614, Alkizon/ 9018 . Paserw2-814 . i/- jvri cpr-819/ -„:uk, 9 :34i 7d /. z,?7-/717 911/-5,ye/ 941/-953e/ t e n 4 m si t c n k r f t c • t l . 4ppla.v rz r ei a t - a m RAo k h 5 for art ia4+iht. kei 4• •P' oc confro • A t otc t c c /mama. rir: Sci5ct(l ilx)9frit Ci n 1(cto ar,6ziizi ez- 4 09 e i S V l ( t e " i , : c t , , A to 4 . y t ,+ le t F i l s 3 )ica i e t L r k w )! P12 4o, undtrsid r N 5 t c L z 3 - r \ t s OC r Es s 4 oc uc 9414114 9?),4-06.0 3 ct31- 955,- 709 90 -6.-76 7,3 a19L/ 39(07 c/'3 yz • 9 2 `i 15)-2 a (3'. ItA3 1:n3 NA St 114 6 A eiv4.1..%_, WOO 0) 15 /ja 41, ,--;-.' -5, ,t,;:z „, ,...iize .,..._,' / .7 .. ( I / i II 1.44,_ilisA:L, 1(Ast, ' ghg_ 7/7 9r? .)-,' II.; J." ) !(-2..7731'''' •,-,) 1-, /.. ICY . , — )1 7 7 .7 ? 22'2_727 ; : ) 7 /,) L.' L / - , ' - ?7-7 ?/(, "..,'>' gc• 14 4 d .2 • --,-.,-,-,..) -1-cr74.----9 z 4.'_ i e ' / d3 o'n2,114-°Jc_Ltel -17frb . 0,a, 17001.pr) LI m. 1 :: . 1L---:4---7,-; L .-. - . ( ' ' ; c .,t, - A h b -7.7Pp Z. 0 7 --'7 ,i/ . / - (2,-1 r-, '-x-i-'6-; ,,.. .,/-.,;' / L..--i(_ - -.7---, ,..... . 2) ,--,-:.,,fn--:j:, ,-,:J. A-Isz, 6 ,-- /.4 .(y-.-i 4:-_-_f/9-, 20 -., / -). 6.-2k-L-4-)V •L 1-1-2-) -u tit„ . ))------ut.___ 1,-2:z ...cc , ___,,,,--our,-.4e--' q:3 ‘-c/ (VIZI JTC/.7 (fh d LAL - ,7 .3 ,317.J....Al ,-.1.,1,e cc- L, . .._ • .--...; ..4. ...-7- ..,7er,r,„ ‘"-,-0E / 7z..;', - /lib ,-/ ? '',' -4t721-2/1. Ih4/-:' ." 24?,)(( ",./-7.:- ,(-i, ,-,4-tv /c/4- ivs,,--,:„,) 7,-7% -/liu d, )1g 79$ < (.13 • 40 1L4 -001 ,) -91,20-/ift, crsi . V., fria4'2,i- Y`7b IL: /Ja? .(qq)_i__ 7.71r / =x- / 77(,, , ( -/AZ, '17-)//r) WCl/ -7Z-71° r,,77 „rrti (N1 - -7'7/f -4A!, b - )-) 777!„4-707fri b"-frri "6 --er -9, 571/ ,rA • I I .-466L1 UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1986 6:00 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BOARDROOM COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock, and Paul Redpath CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Finance Director John D. Frane, Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson, and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: All members were present I. APPRVAL OF AGENDA The following items were added to the Agenda: IV. A. Recom- mendation to the Hennepin County Park Board regarding two County Parks on Lake Minnetonka. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Agenda as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. II. APPOINTMENT OF CHAIRPERSON AND THREE VICE-CHAIRPERSONS TO SERVE ON THE CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES Peterson suggested that the Council appoint four persons and then ask the four to select a chairperson among themselves. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to appoint four persons to the Citizens Committee for City Administrative Offices and to direct those four persons to select a chair- person among themselves. Motion carried unanimously. Peterson asked whether the Council would consider meeting with the four Committee members soon to review the charge to them. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to set a Special Meeting for Saturday, September 27, 1986, at 9:00 AM for the purpose of meeting with the four members of the Citizens Com- mittee, subject to rescheduling if two or more of the four members are not able to attend the meeting. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes -2- September 23, 1986 III. REVIEW PROPOSED 1987 CITY BUDGET (Resolution No. 86-252) Bentley asked when information relative to the bond issue on the fire stations would be available. Finance Director Frame said the bond issue should occur before the end of the year because of favorable interest rates. Anderson asked if budget amounts that were not spent for last year are carried over to next year. City Manager Jullie said those amounts would be transferred to the General Fund. Ander- son then asked about the situation with Valley View Road funds. Jullie said that the transportation fund is accumulated with interest each year. Anderson asked about the status of the trail west of County Road #1 since the trailway was staked. Jullie said he would check into it and see what is holding up the construction of the trail. Bentley said he wanted to compliment City Manager Jullie and Staff on a fine job of preparation for this year's budget, particularly in view of the loss of several major revenue items, the considerable increase in fiscal disparities loss to our as- sessed valuation, and the addition of fire bonds. He noted that the mill rate is essentially unchanged despite the revenue losses. He said he thought this showed the Community the important effect on the budget of the increased assessed valua- tion of about $42 million. He said he thought the fiscal dis- parities situation needs to be modified or changed. Pidcock noted that she liked the format of this year's pre- sentation. Jullie said it was based on the League of Cities format. Bentley asked Frame when we anticipate starting to withdraw out of the T.I.F. district. Frane said optimistically we would not use all of the money collected in 1988 and definitely would not use it all in 1989. Bentley noted that had turned out to be a wise move. City Manager Jullie addressed his memorandum of September 12, 1986, in which assessed valuations, tax levies, mill rate, other non-tax revenues, and program expenditures were addres- sed. Jullie noted the 1987 budget calls for expenditures of $8,983,400, an increase of 12.9% over 1986 expenditures. The Council proceeded to review the budget on a page-by-page basis. Questions and concerns regarding specific items were noted and will be responded to in a memorandum to the Council prior to the time it next considers the budget. Discussion resulting in specific motions by the Council follows. City Council Minutes -3- September 23, 1986 City Manager Jullie noted the elected official salary survey conducted by the A.M.M. and said that if no adjustment is made now it would be two years before another adjustment could be considered. Pidcock asked what the average salary is. Jullie said the mean for mayors is $6700 and for councilmembers is $4800 so we are at the very low end. He said he thought a change would be in order. A discussion followed regarding the exten- sive time spent on Council business by the Mayor and Council- members. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to increase the salaries of the Mayor and Council members by $1200 per year and to direct City Attorney Pauly to prepare the ordinance required for this action. Motion carried unanimously. Bentley noted his concern about the $87,000 budgeted for a new paving machine and equipment trailer. He asked if we could get by with what we have for a while longer. Jullie said that we could get by with the current equipment and that there was a possibility of leasing a machine for a month or so. He said that the paver was needed primarily to do a more professional job. Bentley said he thought leasing was a good idea as he didn't believe we're ready for the $87,000 expenditure yet. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to delete $75,000 for the paving machine and $12,000 for the equipment trailer from the 1987 budget. Redpath asked what was wrong with the present machine. Jullie said the present one does not produce a professional-looking job as it is towed behind a truck. Peterson said he wasn't prepared to say we shouldn't look into it more carefully. He said there would be increased costs if the road wears out faster. Jullie said the current equipment is ten years old and so something will have to be done some- where down the road. He said he thought we could lease for about $7500 per month and that the overlay of the streets sched- uled for 1987 could probably be completed in one month. Redpath called the question. VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously. TV. OTHER BUSINESS OR REPORTS A. Recommendation to the Hennepin County Park Board regarding two County Parks on Lake Minnetonka City Council Minutes -4- September 23, 1986 Anderson said that the Hennepin County Park Board 1s. proposing one metropolitan area regional park on the eastern side of_Lake Minnetonka and another one_bn the western side. He said there S.re Presehtly ho:Parks the lake that are open to the public.. He said there is a meeting tomorrow night at TOhka Bo City Hall and that they are trying to get supPort:fromcommunities::Other than those on the lake. He said some of the communities adja- cent to the lake including:Mound., Minnetriata,:Teephaven and Shorewood are opposed to the proposal Bentley said he understood they are not talking about public access to the 1:SA6T:but ratherjust parks on the lake. He asked if, by Supporting this proposal, We are getting involved in the access istue:, Anderson said we will only be involved in getting two parks on the lake. MOTION: Redpath moved', -seconded by Anderson, to support the:Hennepin County Park DiStriCt'setforts for park prop- erties on Lake MinnetOnka. Motion Carried unanimously. V. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by. Anderson, to adjourn the meeting at 9:40 PM. 21,4'7 UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 1986 COUNCIL MEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 7:30 RA, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BOARDROOM Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock and Paul Redpath City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Planning Director Chris Enger, Director of Community Services Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson ROLL CALL: All members were present. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following item was changed on the Agenda: Item VII. E. Request from Douglas Reuter for Council to consider an Ordinance on filing of campaign contributions and expenses was incorpor- ated into Item X. C. 1. Report on Code of Ethics and Campaign Disclosures in City Code. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Agenda and Other Items of Business as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES A. Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, September 2, 1986 The following change was made to the Minutes: page 11, paragraph 4, sentence 2--change "with Redpath abstaining." to "; Redpath abstained on Item 29576 (Wilson Tanner In- centives)." MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Minutes of the regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, September 2, 1986, as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes -2- October 7, 1986 B. Special City Council Meeting held Thursday, September 4 , 1986 The following change was made to the Minutes: page 7, paragraph 8, sentence 1--change "corn" to "some". MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held Thursday, September 4, 1986, as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously. C. Special City Council Meeting held Saturday, September 27, 1986 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held Saturday, September 27, 1986, as published. Motion carried unanimously. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List B. Approval of Amendment to South Hennepin Human Services Council Agreement C. Brauer & Associates Contract for Miller Park D. Final Plat approval for Primeland 5th Addition (City West Parkway) Resolution No. 86-258 E. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission permit application for sewer connection - Windsong Two (East extension of Chestnut Drive) Resolution No, 86-259 F. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 49-86, amending City Code Chapter 9 by adding thereto a new Section 9.09, which prohibits the harassment of dogs used for Public Safety purposes; and adopting by reference City Code Chapter 1 and Section 9.99, which, among other things, contain pen- alty provisions G. STARING PINES ADDITION by Jerry Krebsbach. Approval of Developer's Agreement for Staring Pines Addition for devel- opment of 1.63 acres without right-of-way into three, R1-22 single family lots. Location: West of East Staring Lane. H. STENEHJEM ADDITION by Kathleen M. Stenehjem. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 35-86, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Stenehjem City Council Minutes -3 - October 7, 1986 Addition; and Adoption of Resolution No. 86-202, Authoriz- ing Summary of Ordinance No. 35-86 and Ordering Publica- tion of Said Summary. 3.34 acres into five single family lots. Location: North of Craig Drive, east of Duck Lake Road. (Ordinance No. 35-86 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 86 - 202 - Authorizing Summary and Publication) I. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 53-86, amending City Code Section 9.40 relating to discharge of weapons J. Resolution No. 86 -257, Appointing Election Judges for the November 4, 1986, General Election Regarding Item B, Bentley asked if his assumption was cor- rect that Bloomington and Richfield refused to agree with the change to allow approval of new programs by three of the four councils. Redpath said that was correct. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve Items 1 - J on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unani- mously. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 1986 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING (Resolution No. 86-228) Continued from September 16, 1986 for Westover Woods City Manager Jullie stated there is one parcel that remains to be resolved. Director of Public Works Dietz reviewed the additional data and the proposed resolution of the assessment. Russell Smith, of Russell Smith & Assoc., reviewed the appraisal of the property done by his firm. He said that the appraisal states that the benefit to the property from the improvements is greater than the cost of the improve- ments. City Attorney Pauly noted for the record that this special assessment refers to Outlot C of the Research Farm Addition and Mr. Smith's report of his appraisal is included in the Council material with a cover letter to Mr. Dietz dated September 9, 1986. Jim Ostenson, representing proponent, said he was dis- appointed that the appraisal did not show examples of simi- lar assessments. He said their own research showed other similar projects were assessed $1200-$2200 per lot whereas Westover Woods is being assessed at approximately $5700 per lot. City Council Minutes -4- October 7, 1986 Ostenson noted they received a letter from the City dated January 15, 1986, in which the City assured them that the assessment would be $90,000 + 10%. He said on the basis of that letter they concluded negotiations with Northrup King and determined the type of development for the land. He said their actual assessment is $190,000, which is more than twice the expected assessment. Dietz said the method of splitting the assessments against the Research/Northrup King property was dictated by the owners at that time. He said it wasn't until the final assessments were computed that we found they were higher than expected. He said he would recommend that the Council, based on the uniqueness of the property, consider splitting the difference and compromise at $135,000. Ostenson responded that that suggestion had been made to them and they did not accept it. He said they would have brought in a different kind of project for approval had they known the assessment would be so high. He said that, at the time the letter from the City was mailed, 95% of the project was done and therefore the City should have been aware of the increased costs at that time. Peterson said he was concerned about the major discrepancy between this assessment and those of other comparable proj- ects. Dietz reviewed the reasons for the increased costs for the road and the arrangements with the previous owners on the assessments. He said the alignment of the road was changed after the Feasibility Study was completed and the change resulted in more front footage on this property. Anderson asked Dietz if he thought $100,000 - $110,000 would be a fair assessment. Dietz responded that he thought $170,000 - $190,000 was a fair price to be able to develop the property. Anderson said he thought it is difficult for a single-family development to have to pay this kind of an assessment. Pidcock asked Ostenson how much the lots would sell for. Ostenson said they have a firm agreement as part of a de- velopment loan to sell the lots at $27,800 and this assess- ment would amount to $5757 per lot, not including any as- sessment for sewer and water trunk charges. Pidcock then said she thought it was unfair to use the same assessment for single-family as that used for commercial and multi- residential. c*N'a City Council Minutes -5- October 7, 1986 Bentley said he had two concerns: one, relative to the original agreement to assess the entire parcel and the subsequent agreement that the assessment would be levied against a smaller parcel; two, a letter dated early this year at which time we should have been able to verify what the costs were going to be. He said he would lean to re- duction down to something around $110,000 from the $170,000 assessment we are dealing with here tonight. Ostenson said the property was assessed $190,000. He said Northrup King had reached an agreement that the assessment would be decreased by $20,000 after they gave material to the City to improve the road. He said his company had then paid Northrup King the $20,000. Dick Putnam, representing proponent, said he thought the $90,000 was high to begin with and that on top of that there are three acres of property in Outlot C that they dedicated to the Anderson Lakes Parkway/Cumberland Road right-of-way. He said they had agreed to the $90,000 in the Developer's Agreement. He said they can't make up the difference on a 33-lot subdivision. Bentley asked if the $90,000 figure they had agreed to in- cluded the $20,000 credit against the assessments. Putnam said that was the gross assessment and the credit would go against the $90,000. Peterson asked if they believed the figure in the January letter was an approximation with a 10% increase possible. Putnam said they did. Bentley asked Jullie what the net effect to the City would be if we "ate" $90,000 on the project. Jullie said it would be absorbed in our overall transportation fund. Bentley said that would mean it would be split over a period of time. Jullie said he thought there was a lot of general benefit to the community from Anderson Lakes Parkway. Peterson said that he thought the date of the letter and the conversations that preceded the letter are very signifi- cant. He said he thought the City and its Staff have a significant responsibility in maintaining whatever repre- sentations are made. He said he thought we have to negotiate this to a reasonable and satisfactory resolution. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the Public Hearing and to set the assessment against Parcel / fl 1#'.• City Council Minutes -6- October 7, 1986 22-116-22 12 0001 at $100,000, less the exact amount of the credit that was previously allowed. Motion carried unanimously. B. EASEMENT VACATION - APPLE GROVES 2ND ADDITION (south of Valley View Road, west of Duck Lake Road) Resolution No. 86-260 City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified. Director of Public Works Dietz outlined the location and explained the reasons for the request for vacation. Peterson asked if there would be any impact on any exist- ing trails or any planned trails. Dietz said there would be no impact on trails. Anderson asked if there would be any impact on wildlife. Dietz said it was a man-made pond. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the Public Hearing and to adopt Resolution No. 86-260, Vacation of a Drainage and Utility Easement in Apple Groves 2nd Addition. Motion carried unanimously. C. ROADWAY VACATION - RESEARCH ROAD (adjacent to School Dis- trict property) Resolution No. 86-261 City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified. Director of Public Works Dietz reviewed the proposed road- way vacation. He referred to the correspondence from Minnegasco to the City and to Mr. Gamm of the School Dis- trict regarding the eight-inch gas main in the southerly half of Research Road. He said a utility easement will be retained to accommodate the gas main. Peterson asked if the proposed alignment of Research Road will be the same as what it would be without the proposed vacation. Dietz said it will be the same. Anderson asked Director of Community Services Lambert if there would be playfields for the City there. Lambert Oir C'Tpl City Council Minutes -7- October 7, 1986 said no but that the City would probably use those built by the School District. Pidcock asked if the easements would be well marked so that nothing will be built there. Dietz said the gas com- pany would probably put markers as part of their aware- ness program. Jim Anderson, representing Minnegasco, said they have no objections if it is subject to the existing rights. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the Public Hearing and to adopt Resolution No. 86-261, Partial Vacation of Right-of-Way of Research Road. Motion carried unanimously. D. WESTON BAY by the Pemtom Company. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on approximately 88 acres; Planned Unit Development District Review on approximately 88 acres, with variances; Zoning District Change from RM-6.5 to R1-13.5 on 13.5 acres, with Shoreland Management variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals; and Pre- liminary Plat of 13.5 acres into 24 single family lots and one outlot. Location: South and east of Mitchell Lake, west of Timber Lakes Drive. (Resolution No. 86-254 - PUD Concept Amendment; Ordinance No. 51-86-PUD-7-86 - Rezoning and PUD District; Resolution No. 86-255 - Preliminary Plat) City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified. Dan Herbst, representing proponent, addressed the proposal. Planning Director Enger said the Planning Commission re- viewed this project at their September 8th meeting and recommended approval on a 4-0 vote, subject to recommenda- tions in the Staff Report of September 5, 1986. He said the Commission was concerned about the pond, particularly the maintenance and control of the north side of the pond; however, proponent has since devised a plan to provide an outlot so that the pond area can be controlled by the home- owners association. He said there is a revised landscape plan that involves fencing and landscaping. He said there was concern about the length of the cul-de-sac and that Staff now believes it is feasible to connect the road through to Miller Park in a way that will not attract additional traffic through the subdivision. ,,zcr City Council Minutes -8- October 7, 1986 Enger said there are a number of variances requested be- cause of the constraints imposed by the Shoreland section of the City Code and state statutes. He said Mitchell Lake is a natural environment lake and as such is governed by the Shoreland code. He reviewed the reasons for the vari- ance requests and the recommendations regarding tree re- placement. Director of Community Services Lambert said the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission reviewed this item on September 15th and recommended approval subject to the recommendations of the Planning Commission and Staff which included the 75-foot easement and setback on Lot 14. He said they felt that turning the house on Lot 14 would allow sufficient easement without requiring a vari- ance. Redpath asked if removing one lot would get rid of four variances. Enger said that was true and that they had re- commended it be Lot 10. Peterson asked how the road would be continued rather than ending as a cul-de-sac. Dietz pointed out the possible route on the map of the project. Pidcock asked if this was originally approved as a town- house project. Enger said it was. Pidcock then noted this project would have a lower density and thus a more desirable environment than the townhouse development. Anderson said he didn't like to give away lakeshore prop- erty as we have very little of it left. He said that he believed the City should be able to have more input as to what will be developed in a particular location rather than the developers always presenting what they want to build. He said that, in this project, it might be better to put the roadway along the lakeshore since that would also avoid some of the variances required for the project. Bentley asked Enger if, taking into account the outlots, the project as it appears meets the intent of the Shore- line management ordinance. Enger said it did with regard to lot width adjacent to the shoreland. Bentley asked if the only place where a problem occurs with distance from the high-water mark is at the far west end. Enger said Lot 14 would be 65 feet rather than the required 75 feet. Bentley asked if a setback problem would be created by moving the structure on that lot to the south. Enger said he thought it would be possible to build and meet the side- yard setback requirements as well as the 75-foot easement. City Council Minutes -9- October 7, 1986 Peterson asked what kind of on-going commitment is ex- pected regarding the pond and maintenance. Herbst said they are proposing a homeowners association and that the pond is already established with inlets and outlets. Peterson then asked if it was expected that it will re- quire considerable maintenance at some future time. Dietz said maintenance necessary for its function would have to be done by the City. Bentley asked if it would be possible to make a road connec- tion at the end of the cul-de-sac and cut it back to the east rather than making the connection in the middle of the project. Lambert said there would be some problems toward the end of the cul-de-sac. A discussion of the impact of the road connection followed. Anderson asked how residents on the cul-de-sac would get to the park. Lambert said a sidewalk along the east side of the road will lead to a trail to the park. Pidcock asked if there would be a trail down by the lake. Lambert said there would be a private trail to their out- lot. Pidcock said she thought the intent was that all the lakes could be accessed by everybody in Eden Prairie. Lam- bert said the area to the north has already been cat off to a public trail. Redpath noted that there is an access to the lake on the north side but it is just for residents. Lambert said there will be public access when Miller Park is built. Tim Crain, 7919 South Bay Curve, said he was president of the Timber Lakes Homeowners Association and asked the Coun- cil to look favorably on the variance requests. He said they have concerns about the traffic problem but that he thought this is the best alternative land use as far as the traffic impact is concerned. Redpath asked what can be done about the variances. Enger said that was the dilemma the Planning Commission struggled with. He said one way would be to eliminate one of the lots on the east side of the road. A discussion followed re- garding means of eliminating some of the variances. Peterson said he thought there should be more discussion on the feasibility of constructing a connector road to the park road. Redpath noted that the cul-de-sac to the north is probably as long or longer than this one. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley, to close the Public Hearing and to adopt Resolution No. 86-254, approving v')(, ,A(40 City Council Minutes -10- October 7, 1986 the Weston Bay PUD Concept Amendment to the overall Mit- chell Lake 1976 PUD. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley, to give let Reading of Ordinance No. 51-86-PUD-7-86 for PUT) District Review and Zoning District Change from RM-6.5 to R1-13.5 on 13.5 acres, with variances subject to review by the Board of Appeals. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No. 86-255, approving the Preliminary Plat of Weston Bay for the Pemtom Company. Motion carried unani- mously. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley, to direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement per Commission and Staff recommendations and including the 75-foot scenic easement, the movement of the building pad on Lot 14 to comply with that easement, and the requirement for 201 caliper inch tree replacement. Anderson noted that he objected to the 75-foot easement when state law requires 150 feet in order to provide a natural environment for the lakes. VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously. E. REUTER dRDF PLANT by Reuter, Inc. Request for Zoning Dis- trict Change from Public to 1-2 Park on 1.3 acres and Pre- liminary Plat of 10.63 acres into one lot. Location: South- east corner of County Road 67 and Indian Chief Road. (Ordinance No. 52-86 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 86-256 - Preliminary Plat) City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been published and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified. Ron Krueger, representing proponent, addressed the proposal. Peterson asked City Attorney Pauly if there was any prob- lem with the proposed procedure. Pauly said he didn't see any problems with it. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing and to give 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 52-86 for rezoning. Motion carried unanimously. if ' City Council Minutes -11- October 7, 1986 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No. 86-256 approving the Preliminary Plat of Reuter dRDF Plant for Reuter, Inc. Motion carried unani- mously. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 29861 - 30336 Bentley asked about Item 30111 to the American Arbitration Assoc. Jullie said this was a fee to cover arbitration of a dispute with the contractor for lime sludge in 1985. Pauly noted that the outcome was very favorable. Bentley asked about Item 30167 to Elvin Safety Supply Inc. for gloves and dog repellant. Finance Director Frame said this was for the water meter readers. Pidcock asked about Item 30164 to Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce for dues for City Hall. Frane said that the City can choose to be a member thus allowing all employees to par- ticipate in activities for the $250 fee. Pidcock asked about Item 30258 to Nationwide Advertising Ser- vice for employment ads. Jullie said that we advertise for Police Officers nationally and that it is quite expensive to do so. Pidcock asked about Item 30231 to Virginia Ledford for legal service. Jullie said he would check on that and get back to her. Pidcock asked about Item 30304 to Emmett Stark for Community Band Service. Franc noted he is the Director of the Community Band. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Payment of Claims Nos. 29861 - 30336. Roll call vote: Ander- son, Bentley, Pidcock, Redpath and Peterson voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously. VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. 1st Readinc of Ordinance No. 50-86, amending City Code Section 2.05 relating to the salaries of Mayor and Council Members, and aToTting by reierence City Code Chapter 1 and Section 11.99 which, among other things, contain penalty provisions City Council Minutes -12- October 7, 1986 MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to give 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 50-86, amending City Code Section 2.05 relating to the salaries of Mayor and Council Members, and adopting by reference City Code Chapter 1 and Section 11.99 which, among other things, contain penalty provi- sions. Motion carried unanimously. VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Presentation by Naegele Outdoor Advertising Company on Billboards (Nancy Fletcher) Continued from September 16, 1986 City Manager Jullie noted that Naegele Outdoor Advertising Company has a proposal to present regarding billboards. Nancy Fletcher, representing Naegele, reviewed the pro- posal to remove billboards along Hwy. 169 by the Minne- sota River bluff as a trade for other locations within the City. She also reviewed the current location of billboards in the City. Redpath asked if they intended to replace sign for sign. Fletcher said that is one of the details that would have to be worked out. She said they are talking about a per- site approval by the Council. Peterson asked what percentage of the total signs would be committed to Eden Prairie. Fletcher said she thought the best procedure would be to offer them on a first basis to Eden Prairie businesses. Pidcock asked what she meant by a "fresh new approach" to outdoor advertising. Fletcher said they are talking about something smaller with landscaping and well-spaced place- ment. Pidcock asked what size she was talking about. Fletcher said no more than 450 square feet on the non- freeway signs and 300 square feet further out. Anderson said the main intent of the Council in asking for a new proposal was to remove the signs from the bluffs area. He asked if she was saying that it is more appro- priate for Naegele to put signs in a commercial area. She said she was and that they were particularly interested in the Major Center Area. Anderson then asked if she was proposing an ordinance change so that they could move the signs. Fletcher said that would probably be a requirement. City Council Minutes -13- October 7, 1986 Bentley said from his perspective this is moving in the right direction, especially since they appear to not be demanding a sign-for-sign replacement as they did before. Pidcock expressed concern that they might make the cost too high for Eden Prairie businesses to take first option. Fletcher said they sell off the rate card only. Redpath said that many years ago the City concluded that outdoor advertising was a legitimate business. He said he thought the agreement was for directional advertising. Fletcher said that directionals are very necessary for places like Eden Prairie Center but on the whole she didn't think it would be advantageous to limit it. Peterson asked what specifically she wanted from the Council. Fletcher said they wanted comments and reac- tions so that they can take the next step with Staff. Anderson said he viewed billboards as a type of visual pollution; however, he said it would be better to have them in a commercial area than on the river bluffs. Peterson said he thought in some areas billboards enhance the commercial nature of a commercial area. He noted that the consensus seemed to be to proceed with the pro- posal. Anderson noted his concern that the billboards be put in areas where the better views of Eden Prairie are not ob- structed even though the area may be designated commercial. B. Proposed NSP Transmission Line along Highway 5 (Continued from September 16, 1986) MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to continue this item to the November 4th meeting. Motion carried unanimously. C. Petition from residents of Cardinal Creek pertaining to lowering of speed limits in their area (Continued from September 2, 1986) Bentley noted that Council had just received a large re- port on this tonight and that he would like time to review the report before this item is considered. George Cartinas, who said he represented the residents, said that they would also like to continue the item. -14- City Council Minutes October 7, 1986 MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to continue this item to the November 18th meeting. Motion carried unanimously. D. Request of Eden Prairie Fire Relief Association for Council approval of changes in its By-laws (a continued item) MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the request of the Eden Prairie Fire Relief Association for changes in its By-laws. Motion carried unanimously. E. Request from Douglas Reuter for Council to consider an Ordinance on filing of campaign contributions and expenses This item was incorporated into Item X. C. 1. Report on Code of Ethics and Campaign Disclosures in City Code. VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS There were no reports. IX. APPOINTMENTS There were none. X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members There were no reports. B. Report of City Manager 1. 1987 City Budget (Resolution No. 86-252) Continued from September 23, 1986 Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson referred to his memorandum and attached report dated October 3, 1986, which addressed questions raised by the Council at the September 23rd meeting concerning the 1987 bud- get. Further discussion occurred regarding the paving machine and the communication system used by Public Safety and other City employees. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No. 86-252, approving the 1987 City Budget as amended. Motion carried unanimously. Anderson said that he wanted to congratulate the Staff on a job well done on this year's budget. za zi City Council Minutes -1 5- October 7, 1986 C. Report of City Attorney 1. Report on Code of Ethics and Campaign Disclosures in City Code and Request from Douglas Reuter for Council to consider an Ordinance on filing of campaign con- tributions and expenses Doug Reuter, 8750 Black Maple Drive, noted that his petition was self-explanatory. Redpath noted he was disturbed about what he felt was one of the candidates and a newspaper attempting to create an issue over this. He said he thought we should continue with what the Council had asked the City Attor- ney to do which was basically the same as Mr. Reuters request. Pidcock read portions of the draft of the minutes from September 16th dealing with the Council's actions and suggestions on the issue of disclosure. City Attorney Pauly reviewed the state statutes in the Fair Campaign Practices Act and noted his memorandum of October 1, 1986, and the attached draft ordinance which would incorporate the reporting provisions pres- ently contained in the Minnesota statutes. He said it would be too late to adopt an ordinance and have it take effect completely before the coming election. He also noted that he had some questions about portions of the state statute. Redpath said he wanted to make it very clear that the action taken by the Council was not to rescind the ordinance but rather was to rescind the resolution which was an amendment to the Ethics Ordinance and, further, that the Council instructed the City Attorney to straighten out the matter to everyone's satisfaction. Peterson asked Pauly if he was suggesting that we might adopt the state statutes in spite of the unanswered questions and discrepancies. Pauly responded that he is suggesting adopting only one part of the state stat- ute and that the more reasoned approach would be to take a serious look at the ordinance and work out some of the discrepancies; however that approach would take more time. Redpath asked how many cities have separate ordinances. Frane said inquiries were sent last week to 30 or 40 cities. Frane said thus far only two out of 16 respon- dents have indicated that they have separate ordinances. City Council Minutes -16- October 7, 1986 MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to in- struct the City Attorney to continue his work on an ordinance change that will provide a clear-cut direc- tion for disclosure. Peterson noted that there has never been a requirement to disclose, rather it has always been voluntary. Pidcock said she was unclear if Mr. Reuter's sugges- tions included making total financial disclosure. She said she was concerned about the situation where a candidate or a member of his family has something that comes before the Council and whether that should also be disclosed since there could be a conflict of interest. Reuter noted he had typed the state law word for word except that he excluded any clauses that referred to political party committees. He said his point is that the City has arrived at a point where candidates should disclose and that it was apparent to him that would not occur on a voluntary basis. He said that he had started this process in June and if it had been handled then there would have been plenty of time to have something for this election. Bentley reiterated his position at the previous meeting that he believed the existing resolution should have been kept in force but also noted that at this point it might be ill-advised to take some sort of immediate action. Redpath noted that the candidates presently on the Council have said they will disclose and the rest of candidates will have to decide for themselves. Dick Johnson, 12640 Sunnybrook Road, said he was con- cerned about knowing where a candidate's money comes from. He said he didn't understand why the State stat- ute couldn't be adopted and why it couldn't be effec- tive for this election. Anderson noted that he had already stated his intention to disclose and that he would encourage the other can- didates to disclose. He said he thought we should give Mr. Pauly adequate time to work out a proper ordinance. Pidcock said she heard the allegation that 60% of the Council did not disclose last time and she resented it since she had filed a full disclosure report. VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes -1 7- October 7, 1986 D. Report of Director of Community Services 1, Elaine Jacques property Director of Community Services Lambert said this is a decision regarding the boundary line and referred to his memo of September 23, 1986, He reviewed the history of the property and the problem with the prop- erty line. He said Staff is suggesting that Mrs. Jacques be given a quit claim deed to Parcels A and B and that Mrs. Jacques give the City a quit claim deed on the 11-foot difference on the north side of Parcel B. City Attorney Pauly referred to the letter from William Odell dated May 30, 1980 that was written to Mr. Lam- bert regarding Parcel A. He said the City still has title to that property. He said the Parcel B property had been acquired from the Hendricksons in 1985. Redpath asked how this affects the purchase price of the Hendrickson property. Lambert said we're just buying less land. Pidcock asked why such proceedings don't automatically include a survey. Lambert said we do now but that this occurred in 1976. She asked why it has taken ten years to settle this. Lambert said that when we first found out about it there was no reason to go to court but that Mrs. Jacques now wants something settled on this. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to accept the Staff recommendation that the City convey a quit claim deed to Mrs. Jacques for Parcels A and B, that Staff obtain a quit claim deed from Mrs. Jacques for the small portion of land on the north of Parcel B, and, further, that the exact boundaries be determined by a survey. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Staring Lake Equestrian Trail Director of Community Services Lambert referred to his memo of September 30, 1986 that reviewed this item. He said that Staff is recommending the national stan- dards for horse trails be adopted and that the eques- trian trail within Staring Lake Park be eliminated. Peterson asked if the request from the Eden Prairie Horsemen for one last ride on the Staring Lake trail had been approved. Lambert said it had been approved except for one portion of the trail. Zig City Council Minutes -18- October 7, 1986 Lambert said there are clearly two issues; one is the marsh and nature trail, and the other is the transpor- tation connection across the creek. Bentley said he had a problem with the survey approach, therefore he would like to deal with Items 2-4 in Lam- bert's memo now and continue the question of the survey. Anderson asked if the recommendation includes extend- ing the trail from the corral down to the river bottoms. Lambert said that was included in a request from the Eden Prairie Horsemen but that further discussion was necessary on that request. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to accept the Staff recommendation to adopt the proposed horse trail guidelines and to eliminate the equestrian trail within Staring Lake Park. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Edenvale Conservancy Area Trail (continued from Sep- tember 2, 1986) Director of Community Services Lambert noted that this item was continued from the September 2nd meeting in order to allow Staff time to work out something with the residents. He noted his memorandum of September 23, 1986, on the subject. Lambert said Staff is now making the following three recommendations: one, to conduct a survey of the resi- dents to determine the demand for a bridge across the creek; two, to mow the top of the interceptor line to provide limited access for nature observation; and three, to work with the naturalists in the Hennepin Parks System on developing a proposed trail system that would provide access to the western part of the marsh. Peterson said his first reaction to the proposed survey was not favorable because he thought it was difficult to adequately present the proposal graphically and that he is not enthusiastic about surveys, generally. He said he thought it was important to have a large survey area included if it is conducted. Anderson noted that we got to this point because we wanted to know where the logical place was to cross the creek since it was important to provide a place to cross for everyone in the community. He said he was against the survey issue only and was in favor of the wildlife area recommendations. -19- October 7, 1986 Redpath said he agreed with postponing the survey issue. Michele Kopfmann, 15560 Edgewood Ct., said she was the only resident here due to a lack of understanding about the discussion on this issue tonight. City Attorney Pauly noted that, since the petition for an E.A.W. had been presented by a group of resi- dents represented by Mr. Cullen, we should ask them to withdraw that petition if they don't want us to proceed. The consensus was to continue consideration of the E.A.W. to allow time for the residents to decide whether to withdraw the petition. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve recommendations 2, 3 and 4 of the Staff Report of September 23, 1986, and to continue to the second meet- ing in November both recommendation one, regarding a survey of the residents, and the consideration of an E.A.W. Motion carried unanimously. E. Report of Director of Public Works 1. Award Contract of 1986 Lime Sludge Removal, I.C. 52- 106 (Resolution No. 86-262) Director of Public Works Dietz reviewed the bids re- ceived for this project and noted the recommendation to award the bid to L. & G. Rehbein, Inc., in the amount of $96,000. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt Resolution No. 86-262, accepting the bid of L. & G. Rehbein, Inc., for I.C. 52-106, Lime Sludge Removal and Disposal. Motion carried unanimously. XI. NEW BUSINESS There was none. XII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adjourn the meeting at 12:05 AM. Motion carried unanimously. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST November 4, 1986 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) E.D.M. Construction, Inc. Hennepin Technical Center KocisManS Home Sale, Inc. PLUMBING Otto's, Inc. Ridgeciale Plumbing Wyllie Plumbing CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY) HEATING & VENTILATING Acorn Group Master Mechanical, Inc. Mark Charles Inc. Ottos, Inc. Energy Efficient Exteriors Enger Construction Paul Heins GAS FITTER Charles Richard, Inc. Yorktown Construction, Inc. Otto's, Inc. Vision Landscape These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. Pat Sone, Licensing John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of 26 A Prairie Lutheran Church CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO, 46-86 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the R1-22 District and be placed in the Public District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the R1-22 District and shall be included hereafter in th e Public District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to i n City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph 8, shall be, and are amende d accordingly. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" an d Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of November 4, 1986, entered into between Prairie Lutheran Church and the City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement is hereby made a part hereof. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of September, 1986, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 4th day of November, 1986. ATTEST: Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION tots 1, 2, 3, 24, 2 5 , 2 6 , 2 7 a n d 2 8 , E D E N PRAIRIE ACRES* accordin g to the recorded plat t h e r e o f H e n n e p i n C o u n t y , M i n n e s o t a . The Northerly lines o f L o t s 1 , 2 , 3 , 2 4 a n d 2 5 4 r e S u b j e c t t o a n application to registe r t i t l e d e s c r i b e d a s The Northerly line of L o t s 1 , 2 , - 3 4 2 .4 :and 25 As-.the Southerl y line of Hennepin Cou n t y S t a t e A i * l l i g n w a y l, asishown On Hennepin County Highw a y P l a t N o :Soo* :70 Of -Mennepi-n County Re-cords, page 3837760 . Prairie Lutheran Church DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1986, by Prairie Lutheran Church, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Church on 10.97 acres; Zoning District Change from R1-22 to Public on 10.97 acre, with variances reviewed by the Board of Appeals for height and exterior building materials, and Preliminary Plat of 10.97 acres into one lot for construction of a church, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the property:" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #46-86, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: 1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the materials revised and dated , 1986, reviewed and approved by the City Council on September 2, 1986, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein. 2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. Prior to release by the City of the final plat for the property, Developer shall execute a special assessment agreement for cost participation for the construction of utilities and street improvements in Blossom Road. 4. Concurrent with, and as part of, the final plat, Developer agrees to include an additional 8.5 feet of right-of-way for Blossom Road and an additional 17 ft. of right-of-way for C.S.A.H. #1. 5. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City " Engineer's approval of plans for sanitary sewer, water, -storm sewer, and erosion control for the property. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above In said • plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, Attached hereto. 6. Developer shall notify the .City and the Watershed District 41841ours prior to any grading, tree removal, or tree cutting on the Iroperty. 7. Because zoning to the Public District is fOr ,all of theA)roperty, Developer agrees that any additional building Or land alteration on the property, other than as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, shall be reviewed by the Planning ComMistiOn And City CoUncih 2,0 I Prairie Lutheran Church CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 86-253 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE 46-86 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 46-86 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 4th day of Novembe r , 1986; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance -No.- 46-86, whiCh is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public -of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 46-86 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on November 4, 1986. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk ;s4 (,9 Prairie Lutheran Church• CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 46-86 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FRO M O N E ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF L A N D IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11 . 9 9 , WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This .Ordinance allows rezoning of land located south of Pioneer Trail, north Of BlOstom Road, and east Bennett Road, from the R1-22 Dis t r i c t AO the Public District," subject to the terms and conditions of a •develope r ' s agreement Exhibit A included_with:this::tIrdinance, gives the full l e g a l description of this propertY.: " Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect on publication. ATTEST: /s/john D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson' City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1986. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.) 9& Weston Bay CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 51-86 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the RM-6.5 District and be placed in the R1-13.5 District. Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the RM-6.5 District and shall be included hereafter in the R1-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of November 4, 1986, entered into between The Pemtom Company and the City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement is hereby made a part hereof. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 7th day of October, 1986, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 4th day of November, 1986. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of ZONING AND PLATTING Outlot C, Timber Lakes, Hennepin County, Minnesota 2(0cf: P.U.D. CONCEPT AMENDMENT & DISTRICT REVIEW Lots 1-25, :Block 1; Lots 1-18, Block 2; Lots 1-24, Block 3; Lots 1-14, Bl o c k 4 ; Outlots 8,•C, D, E, F, G; All of Timber Lakes, Hennepin County, Minnesota Lots 1-7, Block 1; North Bay of Timber Lakes, Hennepin County, Minnesota Lots 1 & 2, Block 1; Outlot A; North Bay of Timber Lakes 2nd Addition, H e n n e p i n County, Minnesota Lots: 13, Block 1; Lots 1-3, Block 2; Lots 1 & 2, Block 3; .Lots 1-3, Block 4; Lots 1-3, Block 5; Lots 1 ,4, Block 6; Lot: 1, Block 7; All of Timber Lakes Townhomes 1st Addition, Hennepin C o u n t y , Minnesota Lot 1 & 2, Block 1; Lots 1-4, Block 2; Lots 1-4, Block 3; Lots 1-3, Block 4 1 L o t 1- 4, 'Pock 5; Lot 1, Block 6; All of Timber Lakes ToWnhomes 2nd Addition, H e n n e p i n :CoUnty, Minnesota , Lots 1-3, Block 1; Lots 1-3, Block 2; Lot 1, Block 3; Outlot A; All of Timb e r L a k e s TOwnhomes 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota Weston Bay DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1986, by The Pemtom Company, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment and Zoning District Change from RM-6.5 to R1-13.5 for 13.5 acres, for construction of 24 single family lots, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #51-86, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: 1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the materials revised and dated , 1986, reviewed and approved by the City Council on , 1986, and attached hereto as Exhibit 8, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein. 2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. Concurrent with, and as part of, the final plat, Developer agrees to provide for a scenic easement to be 75 ft. wide along the shoreline of Mitchell Lake. Said scenic easement shall be dedicated to the City. 4. Developer agrees to notify the City and the Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of any grading, or tree removal, on the property. g,cgo Prior to issuance of any permit for grading upon the property, Developer agrees to implement erosion control measures and adequate protective measures for areas to be preserved and areas where grading is not to occur, and to receive City approval of said measures. Prior to said approval by the City, the Developer must call for on-site inspection of the property by the City. Defects in materials and workmanship in the implementation of said measures shall then be determined by the City. Defects in materials or workmanship shall then be corrected by the Developer, reinspected and approved by the City prior to issuance of the grading permit by the City. Approval of materials and workmanship may be subject to such conditions as the City may impose at the time of acceptance. 5. Developer agrees to confine grading to that area of the property within the construction limits as shown on Exhibit B. Developer shall place snow fencing at the construction limits within the wooded areas of the property prior to any grading upon the property. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning and receive the Director's approval of a tree inventory of those trees within the construction area and within 25 ft. outside of the construction area, indicating the size, type, and location of all trees twelve (12) inches in diameter, or greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground level. If any such trees are removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction area, Developer agrees that prior to issuance of any building permit for the property, Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the. Director's approval of a replacement plan for all trees removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction area. Developer further agrees that said trees shall be replaced by similar tree species and that the trees used for reforestation shall be no less than six inches in diameter. The amount of trees to be replaced shall be determined by the Director of Planning, using a square inch per square inch basis, according to the area of the circle created by a cross sectional cut through the diameter of a tree as measured 4.5 feet above the ground. If a reforestation plan is required, Developer agrees that, prior to issuance of any building permit, to submit a bond, or letter of credit, guaranteeing completion of all tree replacement work as approved by the Director of Planning. The amount of the bond, or letter of credit, shall be 150% of the approved estimated cost of implementation of all reforestation work and shall be in such form and contain such other provisions and terms as may be required by the Director of Planning. Developer agrees to prepare and submit for approval to the Director of Planning a written estimate of the costs of the reforestation work to be completed. Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the Director of Planning. (:17,o 6. Prior to issuance of any grading permit upon the property, Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval, of a tree replacement plan for 201 caliper inches of trees to be replaced on the property. Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer agrees to implement, or cause to be implemented, said tree replacement plan, in accordance with the tree replacement policy of the city, attached hereto as Exhibit D, and made a part hereof. 7. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, and erosion control for the property. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or • cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C. attached hereto. 8. Prior to issuance of any building permit. upon the property, Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of: A. Signage details for the property. B. Lighting details for the property. Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer agrees to implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements listed above, as approved by the Director of Planning. AcA 't PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 51-86, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City-tOunCil finds that said text clearly informs the public of,the intent and effect-csaid ordinance. ADOPTED by the City Council on November 4, 1986. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Weston Bay CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 86-274 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE 51-86 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 51-86 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden.Prairie on the 4th day of November, 1986; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN B. That said text shall be published, once in the Eden Prairie News in a. body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 51-86 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said publication. Weston Bay CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 51-86 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, -AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS.: Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located south and east of Mitchell Lake, west of Timber Lakes Drive, from the RM-6,5 District to the R1-13,5 District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreeMent. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the: full descriptionofthis OrOperty. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1986. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.) A100 ATTEST: John D. Franc, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 86-275 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PERMIT APPLICATION WHEREAS, the proposed sanitary sewer to be constructed on Riverview Road requires a connection to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) interceptor system; and WHEREAS, the proposed connection conforms to the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Sewer Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to submit an applicable for "Permit for Connection to or Use of Commission Facilities" to the MWCC. ADOPTED by the City Council on Gary Peterson, Mayor TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works DATE: October 29, 1986 RE: Easement Agreement for Construction of Dell Road at Town Line Road The attached easement agreement provides for the construction o f D e l l R o a d through a corner of what will be the Tot Thumb parking lot at t h e s o u t h e a s t corner of Townline Road and Dell Road. This roadway connecti o n l v i l l , :be temporary Until Townline Road is upgraded as prOPOtecrin:-1989.: = D u r i n g J h e . interim, it has been determined that a teOporary:access,t0 ToW n l i n e R o a d w i l l be beneficial towards the development that is occurring, The ag r e e m e n t provides that the City may utilize a corner of the private Prop e r t y A n d t h a t upon the new construction of Townline Road and concurrent :reali g n m e n t o f D e l l Road, the City would be responsible for removing the :temporary pavement. I have reviewed this matter and recommend that the touncilauth o r i 2 e --the Mayor and City Manager to execute the Agreement so that the temporary r o a d construction can occur. EAD:sg EASEMENT AGREEMENT 4 THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT Is made and entered into this Z8— day of October, 1986, by and between 101 '86 Partnership, a Minnesota general partnership ("Grantor") and the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"). FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby grants, quit claims and conveys unto Grantee a temporary easement for roadway purposes over and across all that part of Lot 20, Block 6, Hidden Glen 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northwesterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot 20, Block 6; thence South 86' 52' 4" West along the North line of said Lot 20, Block 6, a distance of 1075.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 47' 43' 23" West, a distance of 29.63 feet to the West line of said Lot 20, Block 6 and said line there terminating (the "Easement Property"). Said Easement shall terminate as of the date of the final completion of the permanent intersection of Dell Road and Townline Road as It abuts the above-described parcel of property. Upon completion of said intersection, the temporary road facilities installed by the Grantee on the Easement Property shall be removed at the sole cost and expense of the Grantee and the Easement Property shall be returned to the condition of the Easement Property at the time of the grant of this Easement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF', the foregoing Easement has been executed by the Grantor in favor of the Grantee on the day and year first above writtn. THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By Its And By Its '0Z10,3 2 90q STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Ze day of October, 1986, by 674A-yti j4 a general partner for 101 '86 Partnership, a Minnesota genertl partnership, on behalf of the partnership. otarlePublic STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Eugene E. SChernian Wary . 11166arts , .11evatf • Comefisles Erika II. Ong • The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before •me this day of October, 1986, by and , the and of The City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED BY: WINTHROP & WEINSTINE 1800 Conwed Tower 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 86-276 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF WESTON BAY - WHEREAS, the plat of Weston Bay has been submitted, in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance 'Code and under Chapter 462 of the'Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and 'WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City 01,in and the 'regulations and requirements of the laws, of the State of Minnesota and -ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE clir OF EDEN ' PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for Weston Say is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City. Engineer's report on this plat dated October 29, 1986. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of:the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. • ADOPTED by the City Council on November 4, 1986. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT HISTORY: VARIANCES: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician October 29, 1986 WESTON BAY The Pemtom Company has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Weston Bay, a single family residential plat. The site, located west of Timber Lakes Drive and south of Mitchell Lake in the North 1/2 of Section 17, contains 13.5 acres to be divided into 24 lots and 2 outlots. The ownership of Outlot A which contains 1.10 acres will be transferred to the Weston Bay owners association for use as a private park. Ownership of Outlot B which contains 0.26 acres will be retained by the developer with eventual transfer of ownership to the adjacent Timber Lakes Townhouse association. The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on October 7, 1986, per Resolution 86-255. Second reading by the Council of Ordinance 51-86 zoning the property to RI-13.5 is scheduled for November 4, 1986. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report is to be executed on November 4, 1986. All variance requests not previously approved must be reviewed by the Board of Appeals. TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PROPOSAL: UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities, streets and walkways necessary to serve this site will be installed by the developer in conformance with City standards. PARK DEDICATION: A scenic easement as defined in the Developer's Agreement is to be provided to the City concurrent with approval of the final plat. A recordable document satisfying this requirement must be provided prior to release of the final plat. Other park dedication shall conform to City Code requirements. BONDING: RECOMMENDATION: DLO:sg cc: Mr. Dan Herbst Mr. Harold Peterson c):1Q1 Page 2 Final Plat Weston Bay 10/29/86 Bonding for municipal streets, utilities and walkways shall conform to City Code requirements. Recommend approval of the final plat of Weston Bay, subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: 1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $345. 2. Receipt of street lighting fee fn the amount of $3225. 3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of:$960: 4. Receipt of recordable scenic eaSement Aocuments. 5. Second reading of Ordinance 51-86. 6. Execution of the Developer's Agreement. 7. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 86-263 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF AMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of American Lutheran Church Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota. and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for American Lutheran Church Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated October 14, 1986. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on November 4, 1986. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk A special assessment agreement covering participation for costs associated with installation of utility, street, and walkway improvements servicing the property is to be executed prior to release of the final plat. ix-)09 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PROPOSAL: HISTORY: VARIANCES: Mayor and City Council Members Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician October 14, 1.986 AMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH ADDITION The American Lutheran Church has requested City Council approval of the final plat of American Lutheran Church Addition located south of Pioneer Trail (County Road 01) north of Blossom Road and west of Bennett Place in the North 1/2 of Section 25. The site contains 10.97 acres to be used for the construction of a church. Included within the platting is additional right-of-way dedication for Blossom Road and County Road #1. The plat will combine Lots 1, 2, 3, and 24 through 28, Eden Prairie Acres. The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on September 2, 1986, per Resolution #86-232. This approval allowed a plat containing one lot although the submitted final plat consists of one lot and one outlot. If the owner desires the two lot plat, it must be resubmitted to the Planning Commission and City Council in conformance with City Code requirements. This report is submitted to the City Council with the recommendation that the lot line be removed. (Note: The public hearing for the single lot was held at the Planning Commission and would, therefore, have to be held again for two lots). Second reading by the City Council of Ordinance 046-86, zoning the property to Public, is scheduled for November 4, 1986. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report is scheduled for execution on November 4, 1986. All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All utilities and streets to be installed within this site will be privately owned and maintained. Park dedication shall conform to City Code requirements. Bonding shall conform to City Code requirements, Page 2, Final Plat of American Lutheran Church Addition 10/14/86 PARK DEDICATION: BONDING: RECOMMENDATION: CC: Recommend approval of the final plat of American Lutheran Church Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the tieVeloper's Agreement and the following; 1. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $1,843 7 00. 2. Receipt of engineering fe0m the amount of $1,100.00. 3. Revision of final plat to conform to approved preliminary plat (one lot only). 4. Execution of special assessment agreement: S. Second reading of Ordinance 046786, 6. Execution of the Developer's Agreement. 7. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. Ron Krueger, Krueger and Associates John Dahlquist, Prairie Lutheran Church DO:mh #2'7I0 ADOPTED by the City Council on November 4, 1986. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 21 1i CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 86-278 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF WILSON LEARNING CENTER WHEREAS, the plat of Wilson Learning Center has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for Wilson Learing Center is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated October 27, 1986. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PROPOSAL: HISTORY: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT Mayor Peterson and City Council Members Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works 8 Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician • ' October 27, 1986 WILSON LEARNING CENTER Ryan Construction Company has requested City C o u n c i l a p p r o v a l of the final plat of Wilson Learning Center, a 1 1 . 1 9 a c r e s i t e intended for office use. The proposed divisi o n d i v i d e s L o t 1 Block 1 Wilson Ridge Addition into 2 lot s . T h e s i t e i s located north of Valley View Road and eas t o f T H 1 6 9 i n Section 12. The preliminary plat was approved by the C i t y Council September 16, 1986, per Resolution 86-242. Second reading of Ordinance 48-86-PUD-8-86, a m e n d i n g z o n i n g within an office district, was finally read a n d a p p r o v e d a t the October 21, 1986 City Council meeting. The Developer's Agreement referred to within t h i s r e p o r t w a s executed October 21, 1986. VARIANCES: All variance requests not covered through t h e D e v e l o p e r ' s Agreement must be processed through the Board o f A p p e a l s . UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities and streets to serve t h i s s i t e a r e i n place. Prior to release of the final plat, d e v e l o p e r s h a l l enter into a recordable covenant on the prope r t y t h r o u g h w h i c h developer shall agree to conform to t h e f i n d i n g s a n d conclusions of the 1985 BRW traffic study, wi t h r e s p e c t t o t h e property. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are c o v e r e d i n t h e Developer's Agreement. BONDING: Bonding will conform to City Code requirements . Page 2 Final Plat Wilson Learning Center 10/27/86 RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final -plat of Wilson Learning Center subject to the requirements of this report, theHDeVelopers Agreement and the following:-- 1. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $1719. 2. Receipt of recordable covenant:indicatiOg'-cOnforthation with traffic study. 3. Receipt of sewer connection fee if developer connects to sanitaryiseWer in vAllb); -View Road as proposed. 4. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. JJ:sg cc: Ryan Construction Company Westwood Planning & Engineering ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the .4th day of November, 1986. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor.. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #86-271 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SHADY OAK RIDGE 2ND ADDITION FOR JOSEPH RUZIC BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Shady Oak Ridge 2nd Addition for Joseph Ruzic, dated August 29, 1986, consisting of 7.6 acres into 11 single laMily lots and one outlOt, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is fOund.:.H.tobe in conformance with the provisions of the •Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting -. ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. 61-84 R1-13 5 PROPOSED SITE 1 ARE).N,1-9PATION MAP STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: PROJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: REQUEST: Planning Commission Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning September 19, 1986 Shady Oak Ridge 2nd Addition Corner of Rowland Road and Shady Oak Road Joe Ruzic 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.4 acres. 2. Preliminary Plat of 7.6 acres into eleven single family lots and one oulot. Background This project is a continuation of the Shady Oak Ridge 1st Addition which was approved by the City Council on September 2, 1986. The subject property is currently guided for Low Density Residential as is the property to the north. Im- mediately to the south is the Bryant Lake Regional Park, while the property to the east and west is currently guided Low Density Res- idential and zoned Rural. The proponent is currently re- questing a zoning district change from Rural to R1-13.5 and the preliminary platting of ap- proximately 7.6 acres into eleven single family lots and one outlot. Site Plan The site plan depicts a subdivision of approximately 7.6 acres into eleven single family lots and one outlot at a density of 1.45 units per acre. Lot sizes within this Shady Oak Ridge 2nd Addition 2 September 18, 1986 subdivision range from a minimum of 13,500 square feet to a maximum of 18,750 square feet with an average being approximately 15,300 square feet. All the lots meet the minimum requirements of the R1-13.5 zoning district. The proposed lots are consistent with the lot sizes in the Shady Oak Ridge 1st Addition. As described in the Shady Oak Ridge 1st Addition Staff Report, portions of Lots 4 and 5, Shady Oak Ridge 2nd Addition, are part of the property known as The Garden. Any development of these areas will require the adjacent land owner's signature. Access Access to this site will be provided by the extension of Shady Oak Ridge Road through the site and intersecting with Rowland Road. Grades on this road will vary between 7% and 8%. The knoll located in the middle of the site will be cut approximately 40 feet to allow for the street. Because of the amount of cut already on the site to allow for the temporary cul-de-sac, maximum road grades shall not exceed 8%. Even though this cut is considered excessive, it should be pointed out that the lower tree masses surrounding this site will be retained and the cut should not be highly visible from Shady Oak Road or Rowland Road. Another concern mentioned in the previous report was the sight distance on Rowland Road towards the southeast. The proposed grading plan has allowed for the removal and/or the tapering of the slopes back from Rowland Road to allow for a site line distance of approximately 425 feet. This sight distance shall be adequate for this intersection. (See Attachment A) Grading The previous Staff Report recommended the reshaping of the contours along the north side of Rowland Road to more naturally fit the shape of the existing contours. The grading plan shall be revised to reflect the proposed new contour locations as depicted on Attachment B. Because this site is a heavily wooded area, a tree inventory was submitted which shows the location of trees on it. The amount of grading on the site is extensive and does cause the removal of a number of large caliper inch trees. There is a total of 969 caliper inches of trees on this site with the proposed plan removing approximately 393 caliper inches. Staff has calculated an additional 100 caliper inches of tree removal due to grading building pad locations. Staff is recommending that the proponent provide a plan showing the tree replacement of 493 caliper inches which is a total amount of trees lost. Utilities Water and sanitary sewer service can be extended to this site by connection to existing sanitary sewer and water lines in Old Shady Oak Road. Within the 2nd Addition, sanitary sewer will be provided from a break point at the top of the knoll and flowing in a southeasterly direction with connections made in a proposed sanitary sewer line located within The Garden. At present, storm water run-off is proposed to sheet drain across the lots. The proponent will be required to submit a storm water run-off plan for review by the Staff and the City Engineering Department. 3 Shady Oak Ridge 2nd Addition September 18, 1986 Trail Systems On July 7, 1986, the Eden Prairie Parks, Recreation, and Natura l R e s o u r c e s Commission approved the plan for a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk al o n g o n e s i d e of Shady Oak Ridge Road connecting between Old Shady Oak Road and Rowla n d R o a d . T h e proposed plan shall be revised to reflect a five-foot concrete sidewal k a l o n g o n e side of this roadway. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff would recommend approval of the request for Zoning District Chang e f r o m R u r a l to R1-13.5 on approximately 5.4 acres and a Preliminary Plat of approx i m a t e l y 7 . 6 acres into eleven lots and one outlot, subject to the recommendations c o n t a i n e d i n the Staff Report, dated September 19, 1986, based on plans dated Au g u s t 2 8 , 1 9 8 6 , and subject to the following recommendations: 1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: A. Modify the site plan to reflect a five-foot concrete sidewalk along one side of Shady Oak Ridge Road. B. Modify the grading plan to reflect a more gradual grading transition of the property to the north and west as depicted on Attachment A. C. Submit a landscape plan reflecting the proposed tree replacement. D. Submit a revised utility plan reflecting a catch basin system within Shady Oak Ridge Road to capture storm water run-off from the new portion of this project. 2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. 3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee. B. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. C. Stake the grading limits with a snow fence. Any trees lost outside the grading limits shall be replaced on an area inch per area inch basis. Attachment A Sight Line Distance , - reshaping contours \\\\\ ;7- - SHADY OAK RIDGE raCON 101,1a01.1 •atiOCIAT[9. I:: additional grading areas ... ••••!.., GRADING PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAT Grading Attachment B MEMO TO: FROM: 1TIOUGH: DATE: PROJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: RE: Planning Commission Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning October 3, 1986 Shady Oak Ridge 2nd Addition Corner of Rowland Road and Shady Oak Road Joe Ruzic TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN The proponent has submitted a tree replacement plan which Staff has reviewed and has the following comments: 1) The minimum size tree allowed for replacement purposes is three caliper inches for deciduous trees and eight-foot evergreen trees. Designated on the tree replacement plan are 38, six-foot Black Hills Spruce. Revised plans shall depict eight-foot Black Hills Spruce. 2) The previous Staff Report dated September 18, 1986, discussed the sight line distance for the proposed roadway and Rowland Road. The tree replacement plan depicts a number of trees planted within this sight distance area. Prior to Council review, proponent shall demonstrate that adequate sight distance exists. 3) Contained within the landscape notes, its states that "All plant material shall be guaranteed for a period of one year from the date of installation approval by a landscape architect". The proponent will be required to follow normal landscape/screening procedures and requirements. 4) Finally, Staff recommends that as soon as the landscaping material has been installed, snow fencing shall be placed in these areas for protection until the specific lots have been developed. :2'1Z Planning Commission Minutes 3 September 22, 1986 B. SHADY OAK RIDGE 2ND ADDITION, by Joseph Ruzic. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.4 a c r e s a n d P r e l i m i n a r y Plat of 7.6 acres into 11 single family l o t s a n d o n e o u t l o t . Location: West of Old Shady Oak Road, nort h o f R o w l a n d R o a d . A public hearing. Mr. Ron Krueger, representing proponent, stated that the proposed subdivision was intended as a continuation of S h a d y O a k R i d g e A d d i t i o n , a single family development located north of the p r o p o s e d d e v e l o p m e n t a n d a l s o owned by proponent. He pointed out that utilit i e s t o s e r v i c e t h e p r o p o s e d development would be accessed from a development l o c a t e d t o t h e w e s t , L u k n i c 5th Addition (aka The Garden). Mr. Krueger stat e d t h a t t h e i n t e n t i o n o f t h e proponent was to maintain the existing homeste a d s i t e " a s i s " i n a n o u t l o t at this time. Planner Uram reviewed the findings and recommen d a t i o n s o f t h e S t a f f R e p o r t of September 19, 1986, regarding the propose d d e v e l o p m e n t . I n a d d i t i o n t o standard recommendations regarding streets, u t i l i t i e s , g r a d i n g , s t o r m w a t e r run-off, erosion control, and park dedicatio n , P l a n n e r U r a m d i s c u s s e d specific concerns regarding the location of a f i v e - f o o t w i d e , f i v e - i n c h thick concrete sidewalk along one side of Shad y O a k R i d g e R o a d , s t a k i n g o f the grading limits, with tree replacement o n a n a r e a i n c h p e r a r e a i n c h basis for any trees lost outside of the gra d i n g l i m i t s . W i t h r e s p e c t t o grading, there was also a recommendation for m o r e g r a d u a l g r a d i n g t r a n s i t i o n of the property to the north and west as depi c t e d i n t h e a t t a c h m e n t t o t h e Staff Report. Planner Uram discussed the policy under cons i d e r a t i o n b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l for tree replacement within residential deve l o p m e n t s i n o r d e r t o p r e s e r v e the character of the property. He reviewed how t h a t m a y i m p a c t t h e p r o p o s e d development. Mr. Joseph Ruzic, proponent, stated that he h a d d i f f i c u l t i e s w i t h t h e t r e e replacement requirement for this residential subdivision. He also Planning Commission Minutes 4 September 22, 1986 questioned whether a sidewalk was a practical requirement for the property considering the grade of the property in the location proposed for the sidewalk to be located. Planner Enger explained that the requirement regarding tree replacement in residential areas had resulted from concerns by the City Council for the potential obliteration of natural features in the community. He stated that it was the intent of the replacement plan to avoid the destruction of any significant natural features and to maintain the character of the property as it existed prior to development. Planner Enger pointed out that approximately 90% of the property within the proposed subdivision would be graded, and that one hill on the property would be cut by forty feet at its maximum. Planner Enger stated that, without replacement of the trees, Staff would not be recommending the approval of this development on this property, Planner Enger stated that there were many good trees on the property, but that proponent had not yet submitted an inventory of those trees twelve inches in diameter, or greater, for Staff review. He added that it was the northeast portion of the site that supported the majority of the trees on the property, and that the remainder of the site was not wooded. Mr. Krueger stated that the Staff recommendation for replacement of 493 caliper inches of trees would equal approximately 164 trees of a three- caliper-inch dimension, or approximately fourteen such trees per lot. He asked if there would be any flexibility allowed in the replacement plan in order to balance the replacement of the trees. Planner Enger responded that fourteen trees on any one lot was likely excessive, but he pointed out that it did illustrate that the amount of trees that would be removed from the property was a large amount. Planner Enger stated that there had not been any replacement of trees done for the Shady Oak Ridge 1st Addition, north of the subject property. He suggested that it may be acceptable to relocate a portion of the trees from this property to the 1st Addition in order that it could be partially revegetated. Planner Enger stated that one of the alternatives that the developer may consider would be to develop only that portion of the property where trees would not be disturbed, instead of developing the entire site. Hallett stated that he did not feel it would be appropriate to replace trees "just to replace trees," that the relocation of the trees should be reasonable. He added that he felt it would be reasonable to relocate a portion of the replacement trees onto the Shady Oak Ridge 1st Addition property. Hallett also questioned how much of the hill was being removed from the property. He stated that the regraded hill would likely not be visible from Rowland Road, and, therefore, may not be as critical. Gartner suggested that it may be more appropriate to develop the property with cluster housing units, instead of single family homes. Anderson concurred. Mr. Ruzic stated that he felt the property, as proposed, was in character with the other single family subdivisions in the area. Dodge stated that she felt the proponent should abide by the tree Planning Commission Minutes 5 September 22, 1986 replacement policy. She stated that she felt there was some opportunity for flexibility, such as relocating a portion of the replacement trees on the Shady Oak Ridge 1st Addition property. Chairman Schuck stated that he, too, felt that as many as fourteen trees per lot would be excessive and that he favored flexibility in the relocation of the replacement trees. Mr. Ruzic pointed out that the property was being developed at a density of 1.5 units per acre, less than the 2.5 units per acre allowed by the City. He stated that he felt this was an appropriate use of the property. Planner Enger asked Mr. Ruzic what amount of trees he felt would be appropriate for replacement. Mr. Ruzic responded that he felt three-to-four trees per lot would be more than sufficient. Planner Enger stated that this would be approximately a 30% replacement of the trees which would be removed from the property. Gartner asked if alternative designs for the streets had been considered for this property. Planner Enger stated that other designs had been reviewed, but rejected for various reasons. Hallett stated that he felt the closer the proponent could come to replacing 100% of the trees removed, the better the project would be. Anderson stated that he felt the option of relocating some of the replacement trees within the Shady Oak Ridge 1st Addition would be appropriate. He stated that he also felt clustering of units on the property may be appropriate in order to preserve more of the vegetation. Mr. Krueger stated that the proponent would be willing to work on various alternative plans with the Staff to mitigate the concerns of the Commission regarding the trees. Mr. John Hoschetto, 11893 Boulder Bay Road, stated that he preferred to see single family homes built on this property, rather than townhouses or any other form of cluster housing. He asked what would happen to the business that was being operated out of the existing house on the property, noting that there was spraying equipment, dumpsters, and other equipment located on the property. Planner Enger stated that the City had received calls regarding the equipment, also. Mr. Ruzic responded that the equipment was used in operation of the development of Shady Oak Ridge 1st Addition. Gartner suggested that perhaps some of the replacement trees could be utilized to screen this equipment from the view of the rest of the neighborhood. MOTION: Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Dodge, to continue the public hearing regarding Shady Oak Ridge 2nd Addition in order to allow the proponent an opportunity to work with Staff regarding the relocation of the replacement trees for the property. As a guideline, proponent and Staff were to work toward replacement of as close to 100% of the trees to be Gartner. Planning Commission Minutes 6 removed as would be functional and practical. Motion carried--4-1-0 (Gartner against) Gartner stated that she felt 100% of the trees should be replaced, not a portion thereof. V. OLD BUSINESS None. VI. NEW BUSINESS None. VII. PLANNER'S REPORT None. VIII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN was made by Anderson, seconded by Schuck adjourned the meeting at 9:05 p.m. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, October 6, 1986 School Board Meeting Room 7:30 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Chairman Ed Schuck (7:35 p.m.), Rich Anderson, Julianne Bye, Christine Dodge, Chuck Ruebling Virginia Gartner, Robert Hallett Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner; Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner; Kate Karnas, Administrative Assistant Pledge of Allegiance--Roll Call I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Motion was made by Ruebling, seconded by Dodge, to adopt the agenda as printed. Motion carried--4-0-0 II. MEMBERS REPORTS None. III. MINUTES MOTION: Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by Anderson, to approve the minutes of the September 22, 1986, Planning Commission meeting as written. Motion carried--2-0-2 (Bye and Ruebling abstained) (Chairman Schuck arrived at 7:35 p.m.) IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. SHADY OAK RIDGE 2ND ADDITION, by Joseph Ruzic. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.4 acres and Preliminary Plat of 7.6 acres into 11 single family lots and one outlot. Location: West of Old Shady Oak Road, north of Rowland Road. A continued public hearing. Planner Franzen explained that this item had been continued to this meeting pending revisions for tree replacement on the property, as well as other related issues of unit type, street grades, etc. Mr. Ron Krueger, Planning Commission 2 October 6, 1986 representing proponent, stated that the major issue regarding tree replacement from the previous meeting had been reviewed with t h e C i t y S t a f f and that revised plans had been submitted. He noted that p r o p o n e n t s h a d worked out a plan using cluster housing, but that it was clear t h a t t h e t r e e replacement and grading necessary for such a plan would be n e a r l y e q u a l t o that of the proposed single family plan. He stated that the m a j o r i t y o f t h e "damage" to the hill was being done by the proposed road t h r o u g h t h e property, which would not change from a single family plan t o a m u l t i p l e family, cluster unit plan. The maximum road grade allowed i n b o t h c a s e s would be eight per cent. Planner Uram reviewed the findings and conclusions of the Sta f f R e p o r t . H e stated that as part of the tree replacement plan, Staff was r e c o m m e n d i n g that the developer include evergreens as part of the replaceme n t m a t e r i a l s . Also, it had been determined that the sight distance for the i n t e r s e c t i o n with Rowland Road was 350 ft., which was adequate. Planner Ura m s t a t e d t h a t the other major issue of concern was that of protection of th e r e p l a c e m e n t materials after planting on the property. In that reg a r d , S t a f f w a s recommending installation of a snow fence after insta l l a t i o n o f t h e materials for protection purposes. Ruebling asked if the grades of the property would matc h t h o s e o f t h e recently approved Shady Oak Ridge 1st Addition to the nort h . P l a n n e r U r a m stated that the projects would be similar at their joint p r o p e r t y l i n e . Ruebling expressed concern about the amount of grading to b e d o n e o n t h e property and the amount of cut that was proposed from the hi l l o n t h e s i t e . Chairman Schuck noted that the cut of the hill would not be v i s i b l e f r o m t h e roadway. Anderson asked what the major difference was between the re v i s e d p r o p o s a l and the proposal reviewed by the Commission at its last me e t i n g . P l a n n e r Uram stated that explained the difference in the amount of tr e e r e p l a c e m e n t based on policy being established in the City for tree r e p l a c e m e n t i n residential areas. He indicated that the total amount of rep l a c e m e n t t r e e s had been reduced by approximately 100 caliper inches from the o r i g i n a l S t a f f recommendation. Dodge asked if the proponent had agreed to this revised repl a c e m e n t p l a n . Mr. Krueger stated that the proponent did agree to the revised p l a n . Chairman Schuck asked for questions, or comments, from me m b e r s o f t h e audience. There were none. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by Anderson, to close the p u b l i c h e a r i n g . Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by Bye, to recommend to t h e C i t y C o u n c i l approval of the request of Joseph Ruzic for Zoning Distri c t C h a n g e f r o m Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.4 acres for Shady Oak Ridge 2nd Add i t i o n , b a s e d o n Planning Commission 3 October 6, 1986 plans dated August 21, 1986, including a tree inventory, revised plans dated October 2, 1986, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Reports of September 19, and October 3, 1986. Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Dodge, seconded by Bye, to recommend to the City Council. approval of the request of Joseph Ruzic for Preliminary Plat :.of 7,6 acres into eleven single family lots and one outlot for Shady Csali 'Ridge 2nd Addition, based on plans dated August 21, 1986, jpcluding a -tree Inventory, revised plans dated OCtober 2, 1986, subject to the recdOmendations of the Staff Reports of September 19, and October 3, 1986. Motion carried--5-0-0 an3 MY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 86-272 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and, WHEREAS, the proposal of SuperPmerica Stations, Inc., for development of SuperAmerica for Neighborhood Commercial use requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: approximately 1.06 acres located east of Highway #169, north of County Road #1, and west of Pioneer Trail be modified from Fire Station to Neighborhood Commercial. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 4th day of November, 1986. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #86-273 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SUPERAMERICA FOR SUPERAMERICA STATIONS, INC. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of SuperAmerica for SuperAmerica Stations, Inc., dat e d September 17, 1986, consisting of 1.06 acres into one lot and one outlot, a copy o f which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisio n s of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and i s herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 4th day of November, 1986. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, MY Clerk STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: THROUGH: DATE: PROJECT: LOCATION: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning October 3, 1986 SuperAmerica Northeast quadrant of the intersection of Highway #169 and Pioneer Trail. APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: SuperAmerica/Ashland Oil Company REQUEST: 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Fire Station to Neighborhood Commercial on approximately 1.06 acres. 2. Rezoning from Rural to C-Highway on approximately 0.38 acres. 3. Preliminary Plat of approximately 1.06 acres into one lot with vacation of road right-of-way. Background The Comprehensive Guide Plan currently depicts this site for a Fire Station use. Surrounding uses , are guided Industrial to the north ; and east with Open Space and Industrial to the south and west of 1 the site. A portion of the site is currently zoned Commercial Highway. 1 Comprehensive Guide Plan Change The proponent is requesting a change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan from Fire Station to Commercial. Use of this site for a Fire Station is no longer valid since the City has approved a Guide Plan Change and Zoning to Fire Station for a site in the northeast quadrant of Homeward Hills Road and Sunnybrook Road. The new Fire Station site will serve the entire area that was originally to be served by this Fire Station site. - AREA LOCATION MAP Avo SuperAmerica 2 October 3, 1986 Previously this site had been operating as a dairy store and gas station under commercial highway zoning. The change in the plan from Fire Station to Commercial should not precipitate additional commercial development in the area. A commercial highway designation for this property means that the uses would serve the needs of the traveling motorist. Neighborhood commercial needs for this part of Eden Prairie would be served by a guided Neighborhood Commercial site in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of County Road #18 and Pioneer Trail. Site Plan The site plan depicts the construction of a 3,940 square foot gas station building on approximately one acre of land at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.09. The commercial highway zoning district would permit up to a 0.20 FAR for a one-story building. The building, canopy, and parking, meet the minimum setback requirements for commercial highway zoning. A total of 18 parking spaces not including the 12 spaces designated at the pump islands are provided. Free-standing parking spaces provided meet the minimum requirements for a building of this size. Access to this site is by three driveways off Pioneer Trail. Though this might seem excessive for a one-acre site, the driveway access points are needed to provide for efficient automobile circulation and for the delivery of products and gasoline to this site. The traffic plan shows the circulation route for a semi-trailer movement in and out of the site. Though the site appears tight, the traffic plan shows that there is adequate room for turning movements. Grading Since the site is relatively level, overall grading will be minimal. Berming should be increased to the maximum amount possible at a 3/1 slope. There are areas on-site depicted on Attachment A where berm heights can be increased between three to ten feet. Architecture The architecture for building and canopy will be similar to the building located at the intersection of County Road #4 and Highway #5. Primary building materials will be face brick, glass, and aggregate panel. The columns proposed for the canopy should be constructed out of face brick and aggregate panel in a manner similar to the columns at County Road #4 and Highway #5. Any outdoor trash enclosures should be constructed out of face brick and aggregate panel as well. Utilities Water service is available immediately adjacent to the site. However, sanitary sewer must be extended some 600 feet from the east. The developer has agreed to pay for all costs of the utilities extension. The overall storm water run-off drainage is proposed to sheet drain across the parking lot into Pioneer Trail where the storm water will be collected into an existing catch basin system. Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat involves approximately one acre of land. The northern portion of this site is right-of-way for old Pioneer Trail which must be vacated by the City Council concurrent with final plat and rezoned commercial highway. The additional Z) SuperAmerica 3 October 3, 1986 land created by the vacation of road right-of-way is necessary in order for the site to develop in compliance with the minimum requirements of C-Highway zoning. Landscaping Current landscaping requirements are based upon a caliper inch requirement for the size of the building to be constructed and caliper inches necessary to screen parking and loading facilities. The landscape plan requires additional landscaping along Highway #169 and Pioneer Trail to better screen the parking areas, loading areas, and to help break up the amount of hard surface area. The landscape plan needs seven more shade trees of 21/2-inch caliper and ten more ten-foot high coniferous trees where shown on Attachment B. Trails The existing eight-foot wide bituminous trail along Pioneer Trail where shown on Attachment C. Lighting The lighting plan depicts the location of light poles. The lighting standard should be a downcast cutoff luminar with a maximum height of 20 feet so as to direct lighting on the surface and to minimize glare off-site. Lighting under the canopy should be recessed to reduce glare. This would be consistent with the new Tom Thumb and Standard Oil canopies recently reviewed. Signage The overall signage plan depicts a wall sign and a free-standing pylon sign. The free-standing pylon sign is setback 35 feet from Highway #169 consistent with signage setback criteria for all buildings along Highway #169. No signage is proposed for the canopy. The signs comply with the requirements for commercial highway zoning. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Staff would recommend approval of the request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Fire Station to Neighborhood Commercial, a Rezoning from Rural to Commercial Highway, and a Preliminary Plat of approximately one acre into one lot, based on plans dated September 22, 1986, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 3, 1986, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council review, proponent shall: A. Modify the landscape and grading plans to provide maximum berm heights where depicted on Attachment A. The landscape plan shall be modified to include seven additional 21/2-inch caliper shade trees and ten additional eight foot coniferous trees where shown on Attachment B. Modify the site plan to include a continuation of the existing eight-foot wide bituminous trail through the site where shown on Attachment C. 2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall: A. Submit detailed utility, storm water run-off, and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. SuperAmerica 4 October 3, 1986 B. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. C. Request that the City Council vacate right-of-way along Pioneer Trail. 3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. B. Submit samples of the proposed exterior building materials review. C. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee. 2'7 Fie . . .c n.••• ,..•cm.c.mo•• an, a.•••n moo e•s• •n• .. .. .•••••••••• < 1:1 “'" • ••••• •n• em••••••• set • • Rm... 6.... C. !a set. •••n••••••.. n .. ... (1) ••• •••• • •••& 0 CI - / ••••• sa, smr•qg of SNOIWO rm• nn• ... 41. . IL• 111,0011/. i•-•••••n•-a• IMO / .••••• 0 41,10 Zi 4:X '171: •-•., 4100 k( ,..f T... '4, PIONEER TRAIL Additional Plantings Attachment 111 7 " WW1 _ C=nr• Al4e, Planning Commission 3 October 6, 1986 UNAPPROVED MINUTES B. SUPERAMERICA, by SuperAmerica Stations, Inc. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Fire Station to Neighborhood Commercial on 1.06 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to Highway Commercial on 0.38 acres and Zoning District Amendment within the Highway Commercial District on 0.68 acres, with Preliminary Plat of 1.06 acres into one lot and one outlot. Location: East of Highway #169, north of County Road #1, west of Pioneer Trail. A public hearing. Mr. Dan Tyson, representing proponent, stated that this was the location of the former Prairie Dairy store in the community. He stated that, due to the realignment of County Road #1 and Pioneer Trail in this area, a portion of formerly used right-of-way would require vacation in order for the project to be completed. Mr. Tyson pointed out that proponent was requesting rezoning of that portion of the property that would be vacated, as well. With respect to the requested Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment proposed from Fire Station to Neighborhood Commercial, Mr. Tyson stated that the City had recently authorized construction of a fire station in an alternate location within this neighborhood at the northeast corner of Sunnybrook Road and Homeward Hills Road. Therefore, the fire station use in this location was no longer necessary. Mr. Tyson explained that there would be extension of sanitary sewer and water services from the Suburban Wood Products site and that there would be a swap of property between Associated Well Drillers and the developer in order to allow for better lotting. Planner Franzen reviewed the findings and conclusions of the Staff Report of October 3, 1986, with the Commission. He noted staff recommendations regarding front yard setbacks and increase berm height for purposes of screening. Additional plantings were also recommended by Staff for the purpose of screening of the loading area, and the developer was being required to include an eight-foot wide bituminous trail along Pioneer Trail in accordance with the City's trail system plan. Anderson asked about the site selection process for the approved fire ,213/1 Planning Commission 4 October 6, 1986 station site at Sunnybrook Road and Homeward Hills Road. Planner Franzen stated that the matter had been handled by the City Manager's office. Anderson asked about difficulties with neighbors at the existing SuperAmerica station at County Road #4 and Highway #5. Mr. Tyson explained the circumstances, stating that the two sites should have no impact upon each other. He stated that he felt the difficulties had arisen as a result of miscommunication, which was being rectified. Chairman Schuck asked about access to the site, noting that this had been one of the major considerations at the existing SuperAmerica site. Mr. Tyson explained that there would be no direct access allowed to to Highway #169, but that the access to County Road #1 was in a good location for the site for this current proposal of SuperAmerica. Chairman Schuck asked for comments, or questions, from members of the audience. There were none. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Dodge, to close the public hearing. Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Dodge, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of SuperAmerica Stations, Inc., for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Fire Station to Neighborhood Commercial for 1.06 acres, based on plans and written materials dated September 17, 1986, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 3, 1986. Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Dodge, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of SuperAmerica Stations, Inc., for Zoning District Change from Rural to Highway Commercial on 0.38 acres and Zoning District Amendment within the Highway Commercial District on 0.68 acres, based on plans and written materials dated September 17, 1986, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 3, 1986. Motion carried--5-0-0 MOTION 4: Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Dodge, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of SuperAmerica Stations, Inc., for Preliminary Plat of 1.06 acres into one lot and one outlot, based on plans and written materials dated September 17, 1986, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 3, 1986. Motion carried--5-0-0 Planning Commission 5 October 6, 1986 V. OLD BUSINESS None. VI. NEW BUSINESS None. VII. PLANNER'S REPORT A. Residential Tree Replacement Policy Planner Uram presented the final draftAl ' the tree replacement policy changes to be used for single faMilY residentiolAevelopmentt Within: the community. The Commission discussed the policy with the Staff, noting their concerns for preservation of hills, wetlands, and ttherAlaturaljeatures, at well. Planner Uram explained that the:Staff:Wet Working-Awt pOlicy_dOcUMentt for these issues, also, and that documents would :Pe presented to the Commission for their review in the near future.- MOTION: Motion was made by Anderson, seconded by bebling, to recommend to the City . Council adoption of the tree replacement policy as presented. Motion carried--5-0-0 VIII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN was made by Ruebling, seconded by Anderson -. Chairman Schuck adjourned the meeting at 8:50 p.m. 188035.72 5876.00 26887.64 19815.38 5960.00 3690.54 1663.09 42909.95 39475.00 431.80 31872.18 252086.54 228.00 1860.00 DISTRIBUTIONS BY FUND 10 GENERAL 11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT 15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M 17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE lr- PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP A. UTILITY BOND FUND 39 86 FIRE STATION CONSTRUCT 51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 56 ROAD IMPROVEMENT DEBT FD 57 ROAD IMPROVEMENT CORSI FD 73 WATER FUND 77 SEWER FUND 81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 87 CDBG FUND $620791.84 OCTOBER HEALTd INSURANCE SERVICE SERVICE MN DOT MATERIALS-PARK PLANNING SERVICE FUEL-STREET MAINTENANCE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SKATING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-RACQUETBALL LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SKATING LESSONS EASEMENT FOR WALKWAY/BIKEWAY-PARK DEPT CONFERENCE-COMMUNITY SERVICES 1987 MEMBERSHIP DUES-BUILDING DEPT LICENSE-WATER DEPT LICENSE-WATER DEPT LIQUOR WINE LIQUOR LIQUOR WINE WINE DISHWASHER-SENIOR CENTER BOND PAYMENT EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER PACKET DELIVERIES BIKE REGISTRATIONS-PUBLIC SAFETY SPECIAL EVENT/FEES PD-SENIOR CENTER GARAGE DOOR REPAIRS-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING SEPTEMBER 86 CUSTODIAL SERVICES FLOWERS-CITY HALL NOVEMBER 86 RENT-LIQUOR STORE SEPTEMBER 86 FUEL TAX NOTARY COMMISSION-BUILDING DEPT -HOUSING REHABILITATION PROJECT- PLANNING DEPT SEPTEMBER 86 SALES TAX SERVICE SPECIAL EVENT/FEES PD-COMMUNITY CENTER 10.00- 45.40- 400.00- 85.48- 48.84- 720.85 90.65 1107.83 5.00 562.37 5950.39 17.50 6.00 6.00 10.00 10.00 7.00 8.00 8.50 8.50 0.00 6.50 15.00 17.50 17.50 12.75 13.33 346.16 48.00 25.00 15.00 15.00 4486.08 583.08 2679.44 1751.92 2626.73 444.00 428.88 39475.00 22.55 52.00 130.00 120.00 43.00 200.00 47.69 4525.82 271.66 5.00 1850.00 17361.91 656.81 75.00 NOVEMBER 4,1986 VOID. OUT CHECK VOID OUT CHECK VOID OUT CHECK VOID OUT CHECK VOID OUT CHECK PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO TRACY OIL CO INC ROBERT BLUE NEIL CLARK JANELLE FUCHS SCOTTY GUGGENBERGER STEVEN GUGGENBERGER JEFF HARER ELLIE KNICKERBOCKER ANDREW KELZER MEGHAN KELZER VOID OUT CHECK SUSAN LINDE CHARLIE MARTZ NATHAN SCHOLLE BRIAN JAMES STREMKE MATTHEW WRIGHT ELLIE KNICKBOCKER CHARLES & LUELLA DEbONO MINNESOTA REC & PARK ASSN CITY OF HOPKINS STATE OF MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO EAGLE WINE CO EAGLE 01ST CO TWIN CITY WINE CO QUALITY WINE CO CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO DON'S APPLIANCE FIRST BANK ST PAUL MCDONALD'S DANA GIBBS STATE OF MINNESOTA METROPOLITAN SR FEDERATION A COMMERCIAL DOOR CO ROBERT ARNDT BACHMANS JASON-NORTHCO PROPERTIES COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER SULLIVANS SERVICES INC 30689 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 30690 CITICORP INDUSTRIAL CREDIT 391 TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT INC 8629718 30358. 30424 30434 1-'38 L . 39 30643 30644 30645 30646 30647 30648 30649 30650 30651 30652 30653 30654 30655 30656 30657 30658 30659 30660 30661 30662 30663 30664 30665 3n666 57 68 30669 30670 30671 30672 30673 30674 30675 30676 30677 30678 30679 30680 30681 30682 30683 30684 30685 30686 30687 30688 4 .-.4444. .444.4*A404. NOVEMBER 4,1986 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO ICMA RETIREMENT CORP MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PEAA UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS CITY-COUNTY CREDIT UNION SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK RANLEE PUBLISHING INC CRAIG WANAMAKER STATE OF MINNESOTA VOID OUT CHECK VOID OUT CHECK STATE REGISTER & PUBLIC DOCUMENTS PADGETT-THOMPSON SUCCESS BUILDERS TWIN CITIES COMP ASSN UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO EAGLE 01ST CO EAGLE WINE CO PRIOR WINE CO ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO QUALITY WINE CO TWIN CITY WINE CO PAUSTIS & SONS CO MARK VII SALES CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO HENNEPIN COUNTY HOPKINS POSTMASTER A COMMERCIAL DOOR CO AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS ACRO-MINNESOTA INC AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH CO 30729 AM! PRODUCTS INC 30730 ARNIE A AMRHEIN 30731 MARK J ANDERSEN 30732 ASPLUND COFFEE CO INC 30733 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC 30734 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC 30735 ANNETTE BEACH 30736 BERGIN AUTO BODY 30737 BMB SERVICES 30738 LOIS BOETTCHER 4 A FRITZ BOSTON 30692 30693 rc94 1„95 30696 30697 30698 30699 30700 30701 30702 30703 30704 30705 30706 30707 30708 30709 30710 30711 30712 30713 30714 30715 30716 30717 3n718 19 (u,20 30721 30722 30723 30724 30725 30726 30727 30728 PAYROLL 10-17-86 PAYROLL 10-17-86 PAYROLL 10-17-86 PAYROLL 10-17-86 PAYROLL 10-17-86 PAYROLL 10-17-86 PAYROLL 10-17-86 PAYROLL 10-17-86 PAYROLL 10-17-86 PAYROLL 10-17-86 PAYROLL 10-17-86 ADS-LIQUOR STORES REFUND-MEMBERSHIP NOTARY BOND-FINANCE DEPT -CRIMINAL CODE & STATE STATUTES MANUALS- POLICE DEPT CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT CONFERENCE-DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES CONFERENCE-PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SERVICE LIQUOR WINE WINE LIQUOR LIQUOR LIQUOR WINE WINE WINE FILING FEE-PLANNING DEPT POSTAGE-VOTER INFORMATION MAPS DOOR REPAIRS-PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING TRUCK REPAIRS-STREET MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES -FIRE ALARM & SECURITY SYSTEM-PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING -HANDLE BRACKET/HOSE COUPLINGS/THROTTLE CABLE-STREET MAINTENANCE DRIVER'S LICENSE-STREET MAINTENANCE SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD -CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER BLACKTOP-PARK MAINTENANCE -WINDSHIELD WASHER FLUID/SEALS/BEARINGS/ -WIPER BLADE/CRANKING MOTOR/FLARES/ SIGNAL LAMPS-STREET MAINTENANCE MILEAGE PAINT TRUCK & REMOVE DENT-FIRE DEPT VOLUME CONTROL PART-COMMUNITY CENTER -PARK & REC COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR 10/20/86 FITNESS CENTER INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD 23686.70 10062.70 18557.04 149.92 5058.00 760.00 10.00 20555.45 217.50 2363.13 200.00 185.00 12.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 48.00 98.00 55.00 10.00 85.00 18.86 4857.27 661.77 975.42 4219.59 1449.43 1489.23 112.41 15.00 378.88 10.00 878.97 64.00 440.56 763.58 489.00 186.87 20.00 320.00 84.00 10463.04 202.31 10.25 435.00 24.66 48.00 115.50 11085704 NOVEMBER 4,1986 30772 FORD-MCNUTT GLASS CO 30773 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY 30774 FRANZ ENG REPRODUCTIONS INC 30775 GAB BUSINESS SERVICES 30776 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC 30777 CHUCK GOBLE 30778 GOODYEAR TRUCK TIRE CENTERS 30779 GOVERNMENT BUSINESS SYSTEMS 30780 GREENKEEPER INC 30740 1,1741 ( 42 30743 30744 BOYUM EQUIPMENT INC BRAUER & ASSOCIATES LTD BRAUN ENG TESTING INC BROCK WHITE COMPANY B R W INC 30745 BSC 30746 CARDOX CORP 30747 CASE POWER & EQUIPMENT 30748 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO 30749 CITY OF CHASKA 30750 CHEMLAWN 30751 CLASSIC LANDSCAPING 30752 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 30753 JEFFREY CONRADI 30754 CONSOLIDATED PLUMBING 30755 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY INC 30756 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS INC 30757 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CO 30758 CULLIGAN 7 -'59 CURTIS INDUSTRIES t 50 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY 30761 DALCO 30762 DIXIE PETRO-CHEM INC 30763 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU 30764 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU 30765 DYNAMIC GRAPHICS INC 30766 EAGLE SNACKS INC 30767 EARL'S ART & DRAFTING SUPPLIES 30768 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS 30769 EMERGENCY SERVICE SYSTEM INC 30770 CHRIS ENGER 30771 FEED RITE CONTROLS INC 30781 GREGG NELSON TRAVEL INC 30782 GROSS OFFICE SUPPLY Z 13 HACH CO -2 MONROE SINGLE AUGER SANDERS/INSTALL VALVE & PLUMBING FOR SANDERS-STREET DEPT SERVICE-MILLER PARK -SERVICE-PRESERVE BLVD & TECHNOLOGY DRIVE EXTENSION -CONCRETE CURB SEALER/CEMENT HOE- STREET MAINTENANCE -SERVICE-ANDERSON LAKE PKWY-TH169 TO -MITCHELL ROAD/VALLEY VIEW RD-MITCHELL TO COUNTY ROAD 4 SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER CARBON DIOXIDE/SAFETY VALVE-WATER DEPT 0-RING/SNAP RING/SLEEVE-STREET DEPT -LEGAL ADS-RIVER VIEW ROAD & RIVER VIEW DRIVE/TRUCK MOUNTED CATCHBASIN CLEANER GOLF LESSONS/FEES PD LAWN SERVICE-CITY HALL TIMBERS-STARING LAKE PARK MN DOT TECHNICAL MANUAL-PUBLIC WORKS HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD REFUND-PLUMBING PERMIT -COMPRESSED AIR CYLINDER/O-RING/VALVE -STEM/COATS/PANTS/BOOTS/HELMETS WITH -LINERS/FACESHIELDS/PATCHES/LINERS/DRY CHEMICAL EXTINGUISHERS-FIRE DEPT OCTOBER 86 INSURANCE CONSULTANT NAME PLATE-FINANCE DEPT WATER SOFTNER-STARING LAKE PARK GREASE-WATER DEPT QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT CLEANING SUPPLIES-PUBLIC SAFETY CHLORINE-WATER DEPT EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER BOOKS-COMMUNITY CENTER SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES-PLANNING DEPT MANHOLES-SEWER DEPT CAR REPAIRS-POLICE DEPT OCTOBER 86 EXPENSES -EJECTOR/DIAPHRAGM/NOZZLE/GASKET/MULTI- PURPOSE DIFFUSER/VALVE SEAT-WATER DEPT REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE BLUEPRINTS-ENGINEERING DEPT LIABILITY CLAIM-CITY HALL RADIO REPAIRS-PUBLIC SAFETY & STREET DEPT SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT TIRES/O-RINGS-STREET DEPT VOTOMATIC PRECINCT KITS-ELECTIONS -WINTERIZATION OF LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEM- FIRE STATION CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT OFFICE SUPPLIES-PUBLIC SAFETY LAB SUPPLIES-WATER TREATMENT PLANT 4695.42 3000.00 646.80 75.37 20622.10 196.65 3068.66 8.41 315.98 24.75 100.00 2960.00 65.00 220.00 475.50 2272.45 400.00 8.10 12.55 329.03 4887.56 50.30 1354.00 20.46 159.38 389.00 101.16 11.27 303.80 308.20 165.00 360.30 260.00 777.13 224.48 2000.00 311.93 20.44 929.41 183.98 83.00 239.00 343.10 153.53 5313320 NOVEMBER 4,.1986 VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 100.00 -SERVICE-BLUFFS WEST VICINITY STORM SEWER/ 21857.51 BLUFFS EAST 4TH ADDITION SERVICE-SEWER DEPT 200.00 CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 310.00 LATHS-PARK MAINTENANCE 27.25 SEPTEMBER 86 BOOKING FEE 108.56 PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE 288.75 ARCYLIC FLOOR-COMMUNITY CENTER 139.00 EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 11.72 PUMP REPAIRS-WATER TREATMENT PLANT 180.00 FOOTBALL FIELD RENTAL-COMMUNITY CENTER 40.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT 73.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 196.00 SHELVING UNITS & BACKS-WATER DEPT 1240.00 EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER 64.75 AEROBIC INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD 110.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES-FIRE DEPT 20.00 FLARES-POLICE DEPT 504.80 SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 39.30 TREES-FORESTRY DEPT 1330.20 COMMERCIAL INSURANCE-CITY HALL 11883.00 -JULY & AUGUST 86 SERVICE-LANDFILL & 19276.93 DORENKEMPER LITIGATION INSURANCE-WATER PLANT ADDITION 2491.00 -SERVICE-INVESTIGATION OF FLYING CLOUD 4300.00 SANITARY LANDFILL MILEAGE 12.25 DICTAPHONE CASSETTES-ENGINEERING DEPT 27.00 SEPTEMBER 86 SERVICE 4784.23 PAINT-STREET MAINTENANCE 77.21 SNAP RING-STREET DEPT 8.60 -SCREWDRIVERS/HAMMERS/BELT TIGHTNER/ 77.55 WRENCHES-STREET MAINTENANCE ROCK-PARK MAINTENANCE 7.45 EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 175.51 EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 55.61 HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 103.00 GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD 84.00 FORMS-PUBLIC SAFETY 128.00 SEPTEMBER 86 SAC CHARGES 125086.50 AUGUST 86 SAC REPORT 126027.00 BLACKTOP-PARK MAINTENANCE 2591.50 REFUND-HEATING PERMIT 117.10 FILM RENTAL-COMMUNITY CENTER 25.00 SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 81.10 LICENSE FEE-LIQUOR STORE 12.00 CONNECTION CHARGE-POLICE DEPT 150.00 EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER 166.95 ADS-LIQUOR STORE 105.90 3RD QTR UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION FUND 183.67 NOVEMBER 86 SERVICE 37.75 PAINT DOORS-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 199.25 TIRE ALIGNMENT-STREET MAINTENANCE 19.95 -EQUIPMENT REPAIRS FROM LIGHTNING DAMAGE- 651.90 PUBLIC SAFETY atm LI 30784 MICHAEL HAMILTON li: 7 85 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC 3 786 HASTINGS BUILDING CO INC 30787 HENNEPIN CTY CHIEFS OF POLICE 30788 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 30789 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT 30790 HOFFERS INC 30791 HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC 30792 DONNA HYATT 30793 IDEAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 30794 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL 01ST #272 30795 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC 30796 GARY ISAACS 30797 J & G SALVAGE 30798 JERRY SUPER VALU 30799 KAY JOHNSON 30800 LAKE REGION MUTUAL AID ASSN 30801 LAKESIDE FUSEE CORP 30802 LANCE 30803 LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS CENTER 30804 LANE INSURANCE INC 30805 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD 30806 LMTIC 30807 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC '08 DAVID LINDAHL ,09 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 30810 LOGIS 30811 M & I INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 30812 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC 30813 MIKE MARUSHIN 30814 MCFARLANES INC 30815 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC 30816 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC 30817 TIM MCGOVERN 30818 BILL MCNEIL 30819 METRO PRINTING INC 30820 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION 30821 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION 30822 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP 30823 MIDWESTERN MECH 30824 MPLS AREA CHAPTER 30825 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY INC 30826 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 30827 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 30828 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC 30829 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC 30830 MINNESOTA UC FUND 30831 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP 30832 R G MODEEN INC 33 MODERN TIRE CO 3ud34 MOTOROLA INC 32578775 • 30835 30836 30837 - 30838 30839 r-40 1, ,41 30842 30843 30844 30845 30846 30847 30848 30849 30850 30851 30852 30853 30854 30855 30856 30857 30858 30859 30860 30861 c 52 d63 30864 30865 30866 30867 30868 30869 30870 30871 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO NORTHLAND BUSINESS COMM SYSTEMS NORTHWEST TREE CARE HARRY A ORTLOFF P C SOLUTIONS INC T A PERRY ASSOCIATES INC MR SEVERIN PETERSON JOYCE PHELPS JOYCE PHELPS PHOTOS INC PITNEY BOWES PLUNKETT'S INC PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING PRINT SHACK RI R SPECIALTIES INC AAGE REFFSGAARD RISK PROTECTORS INC ROAD RESCUE INC RYANS RUBBER STAMPS SATELLITE INDUSTRIES INC SAVOIE SUPPLY CO INC DALE SCHMIDT SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM INC SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM INC STEVEN R SINELL SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC STACKPOLE BOOKS VOID OUT CHECK COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE STATE TREASURER STATE TREASURER STS CONSULTANTS INC SUN COMMUNITY DIRECTORIES INC SULLIVANS SERVICES INC TARGET 220 30872 LORNA THOMAS 30873 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 30874 UNITED LABORATORIES INC 30875 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE INC 30876 VICOM INC 30877 VIKING BUSINESS INTERIORS INC 30878 VIKING LABORATORIES INC 30879 WATER PRODUCTS CO 3RD QTR 86 SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT TREES-FORESTRY DEPT HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD SERVICE-FIRE DEPT SERVICE-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING REFUND-HUNTING PERMIT SKATING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD SKATING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD GUIDE PLAN MAPS-PLANNING DEPT MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-COMMUNITY CENTER PEST CONTROL-PARK MAINTENANCE -CLIP/COVER/BLADE/SHUT OFF VALVE-STREET DEPT 8, PARKS DEPT PRINTING-FIRE DEPT PRINTING-COMMUNITY CENTER -ICE BLADE GRIND/EXPANSION TANK/OIL FILTER/SPREADER CLOTH-COMMUNITY CENTER LICENSE FEE-BUILDING DEPT BOND NOTARY INSURANCE-FINANCE DEPT -ACME TAPE/STETHOSCOPE/GAUZE PADS/METAL RING CUTTER/BULB SYRINGE-FIRE DEPT RUBBER STAMPS & STAMP PAD-BUILDING DEPT PORTABLE RESTROOMS-COMMUNITY CENTER -CLEANING SUPPLIES/TOILET PAPER-STREET DEPT & PARK MAINTENANCE MEETING EXPENSES AUGUST 86 SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER SERVICE-FIRE STATION OCTOBER 86 EXPENSES & CONFERENCE EXPENSES SOCKETS/DRIVER EXTENSION-STREET DEPT EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER SHOTGUN MANUAL-POLICE DEPT SPECIAL FUEL TAX LICENSE FEE AUGUST 86 BUILDING PERMIT SURCHARGE SEPTEMBER 86 BUILDING PERMIT SURCHARGE SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADS-LIQUOR STORE PUMP TANK-SENIOR CENTER -CARPET SWEEPER/LAMPS/EXTENSION CORDS/ COFFEE POT-ELECTIONS & COMMUNITY CENTER 2 KEYS FOR CITY CARS-ASSESSING DEPT UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT OIL-STREET DEPT GAS CYLINDERS-COMMUNITY CENTER TELEPHONE REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER STEEL SHELVES-BUILDING DEPT CHLORINE-COMMUNITY CENTER -252 5/8 X 3/4 100 GAL MTR @$45.89/250 #2 -COPPERHORN @$13.10/6300 REMOTE WIRE/6 -1 X 1 1/4 1000 GAL MTR @$418.00/3 -1 X 1 1/4 1000 GAL MTR @$145.85/CURB -STOPS/NOZZLE CAPS/CHAINS/OPERATING NUTS/ GALVANIZED NIPPLES/SECTION BOLTS/BUSHINGS 53.26 35.00 1900.00 26.00 105.00 39.00 20.00 96.00 76.80 117.50 108.90 110.00 15.55 162.05 38.00 130.45 45.00 60.00 293.69 97.25 41.07 400.82 12.00 1655.66 1663.09 717.30 50.75 48.00 15.95 0.00 10.00 6530.13 9551.37 1199.54 836.00 50.00 106.59 1.70 448.05 241.48 126.60 33.00 87.10 740.20 16359.80 ( "45565 30880 WATERITE INC 30881 TED WESTALL 30882 XEROX CORP (102 CHART PAPER-COMMUNITY CENTER ARCHERY INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD -MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/OFFICE SUPPLIES- POLICE DEPT & COMMUNITY CENTER 72.32 75.00 113.70 $620791.84 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: MEMORANDUM Mayor and City Council City Administrative Office Committee Nominations to Committee October 31, 1986 Due to Conflicting schedults among Executive Committee members, it has not been possible to meet for the pUrpOseof making a final list of nominations to the Residents CoMMittee on City Administrative Offices, The Executive ComMitteeWill meet Monday, November 3 and prepare :report nOminatingthe'remainim 20 persons to the Committee. This report will -be Presented to the Council at its November 4 meeting. The Executive Committee has also requested proposals for market survey services. It expects to have a recommendation on the firm to perform this work and would ask the Council to authorize expenditure for it. CWD:jdp