HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 09/02/1986 FINANCE DIRECTOR
JOHN FRANE
•
EDEN PRAIRIE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING BOARDROOM
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock and
Paul Redpath
i
CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie; Assistant ,
to the City Manager Craig Dawson;
Finance Director John Frane; City
Attorney Roger Pauly; Planning Director
Chris Enger, Director of Community
Services Robert Lambert, Director of
Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and
Re:ording Secretary Jan Nelson
PLEDGE DF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. PRESENTATION BY NEIL WEBER, HENNEPIN PARKS COMMISSIONER REPRESENTING
EOEN PRAIRIE, REGARDING AN UPDATE ON WHAT IS HAPPENING REGARDING
WC-REGIONAL PARK PLAN IN EDEN PRAIRIE AND LAKE MINNETONKA
III. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, AUGUST 5. 1986 Page 2144 I
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
2166
A. Clerk's License List Page
B. Final plat approval for Westwood Industrial Park 2nd Addn. Page 2167
(between Bury and Carlson Drive) Resolution No. B6-223
C. Final plat, approval for Lake Park 2nd Addition (west of CSAH Page 2169
4 and South of Timber Lake Drive) Resolution No. 86-224
D. Prohibition of on street parking on Baker Road between Roberts Page 2172 J
Drive and CSC 67/62 (Resolution No. 86-22
E. Amendment to Transit Agreement Page 2173
F. Policies for Preservation of Significant Natural Features Page 2176
continued from July 15, 1986)
G. Highway 5 Bike/Pedestrian Overpass (Resolution No. 86-222) Page 2178
H. County, Road 4 Bike Trail Grant Request Page 2180
I. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 43-B6 amending City Code Chapter Page 1B36 1j
8 Section 8.09, which regulates parking lots and ramps
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,September 2, 1986
J. 2nd Reading of Ordinance N. 44-86 amending City Code Chapter Page 1839
7 tx adding thereto a new Section 7.08, which prohibits
motor vehicles from using private property to avoid traffic
control signals and devices
K. PRIMETECH PHASE III, by MRTT Joint Venture. 2nd Reading of Page 2182
Ordinance #42-86, Rezoning from Rural to Office; Approval of
Developer's Agreement for Primetech Phase III; and Adoption of
Resolution #86-234, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #42-86 and
Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 5.86 acres for
construction of a five-story office building. Location:
West of Highway #169, east of City West Parkway. (Ordinance
#42-86, Rezoning; Resolution #86-234, Authorizing Summary and
Publication)
L. WINDSONG, by Koosman and Rice Co. 2nd Reading of Ordinance Page 2189
#37-86, Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5; Approval
of Developer's Agreement for Windsong; and Adoption of Resolution
#86-203, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #37-86 and Ordering
Publication of Said Summary. 12.03 acres into 20 lots and
outlots for construction of 72 multiple family units. Location:
West of Purgatory Creek, east of Chestnut Drive. (Ordinance
#37-86, Rezoning; Resolution #86-203, Authorizing Summary and 1
Publication)
1
M. SHADY OAK RIDGE, by Joe Ruzic. 2nd Reading of Ordinance
6, Zoning District Change from RM-6.5 to Rural and to Page 2195
R1-13.5; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Shady Oak
Ridge; and Adoption of Resolution #86-235, Authorizing Summary
of Ordinance #38-86 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary.
Zoning District Change from RM-6.5 and R1-13.5 on 9.5 acres,
and from RM-6.5 to Rural on 2 acres, and Preliminary Plat of
10.06 acres into 16 lots and 2 outlots for a single family
development. Location: North of Rowland Road, west of Old
Shady Oak Road. (Ordinance #36-86, Rezoning; Resolution
#86-235, Authorizing Summary and Publication)
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PRAIRIE LUTHERAN CHURCH, by Adkins Association, Inc. Request Page 2201
for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density
Residential to Church on 10.97 acres, Zoning District Change
from R1-22 to Public on 10.97 acres, with variances to be
reviewed by the Board of Appeals, and Preliminary Plat of
10.97 acres into one lot for construction of a church.
Location: South of Pioneer Trail, north of Blossom Road,
and east of Bennett Place. (Resolution #86-231, Comprehensive
Guide Plan Amendment; Ordinance #46-86, Rezoning from Rural
to Public; Resolution #86-232, Preliminary Plat)
B. 1986 Special Assessment Hearing (Resolution No. 86-228) Page 2217
VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. Page 2219
city council Agenda - 3
Tues.,September 2, 1986
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
- A. Petition from Jack McKusky for a sidewalk atong Woodland Drive Page 2226
B. Edenvale 9th Addition, Outlot C Grading Plan Page 2231
C. Petition from residents of Cardinal Creek pertaining to lowering Page 2237
of speed limits in their area
"VIII.. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
8. Report of City Manager
C. ;Report of City Attorney
D. ,Re ort of Director of Public Works
1. Award contract for. Hidden Glen 3rd Addition I.C. 52-102
(south of Townline Road and adjacent to Dell Road Re o ution
No. 86-226) —
2. Award contract for Valle View Road, west of Golden Triangle
Drive, I.C. 5-D-89 Resolution No. $6-227)
3. Plan approval TH 169 improvements..between CSAH 1 and Prairie
Center Drive Resolution No.-86-216. Cont
inued from August
9f , 1986
4. Plan approval, Dell Road/184th Street from TH 5z north Page 2244
E. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Edenvale Park Trails System (continued from August 5, 1986) Page 1942
X. NEW BUSINESS & 2246
XI. ADJOURNMENT
d
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1986 7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARD-
ROOM
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock, and
Paul Redpath
CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant
to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director
John D. Frane, Planning Director Chris
Enger, Director of Community Services
Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works
Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary
Jan Nelson
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Councilmember Bentley was absent.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following items were added to the Agenda: IX. B. 2.
Request from American Cancer Society; IX. B. 3. Discussion
relative to Financing for Kahler Hotel.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath,th, to ap
prove the
Agenda and Other Items of Business as amended and published.
Motion carried unanimously.
II. MINUTES
A. Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, July 15, 1986
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve
the Minutes of the regular City Council Meeting held Tues-
day, July 15, 1986, as published. Motion carried unani-
mously.
B. Special City Council Meeting held Thursday, July 24, 1986
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve
the Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held Thurs-
day, July 24, 1986, as published. Motion carried unani-
mously.
•
K y
City Council Minutes -2- August 5, 1986
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. THE GARDEN, by Hakon and Karen Torjesen. 2nd Reading of
Ordinance #22-85, Zoning District Change from Rural to
R1-13.5; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Luknic 5th
Addition (aka The Garden); and Adoption of Resolution #86-
153, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #22-85, and Ordering
Publication of Said Summary. 10.16 acres into 25 single
family lots. Locations North of Rowland Road, West of
Shady Oak Road. (Ordinance #22-85, Rezoning; Resolution
#86-153, Authorizing Summary and Publication) Continued
from July 1, 1986, Council meeting)
B. IDLEWILD OFFICE CENTER 3RD ADDITION, by Land Sake, Inc.
2nd Reading of Ordinance #32-86, Zoning District Change from
Rural to Office; Approval of Developer's Agreement for
Idlewild Office Center 3rd Addition; and Adoption of Reso-
lution #86-182, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #32-86
and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 2.1 acres into
1 lot and 1 outlot for construction of a 14,000 square
foot building. Location: West of Highway #169, north of
Eden Road. (Ordinance #32-86, Rezoning; Resolution #86-182,
Authorizing Summary and Publication)
C. LAKE PARK, by the Rottlund Company, Inc. 2nd Reading of
Ordinance #34-86, Amending Ordinance No. 326, Zoning Dis-
trict Change within the RM-6.5 District; Approval of Devel-
oper's Agreement for Lake Park Addition; and Adoption of
Resolution #86-183, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #34-
86 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 16.7 acres
into 102 lots for construction of 98 townhome units. Loca-
tion: Southwest quadrant of County Road #4 and Timber Lakes
Drive. (Ordinance #34-86, Amending Ordinance No. 326; Reso-
lution #86-183, Authorizing Summary and Publication)
D. EIGHTEEN PARK BUSINESS CENTER, by Investment Services Group,
Inc. 2nd Reading of Ordinance #36-86, Zoning District
Change from the I-5 Park District to the I-2 Park District;
Approval of Developer's Agreement for Eighteen Park Busi-
ness Center; and Adoption of Resolution #86-184, Authorizing
Summary and Publication of Said Summary. 2.85 acres into
one lot for construction of a 37,000 square foot office/
warehouse. Locations West of Washington Avenue, South of
Flying Cloud Drive. (Ordinance #36-co, Rezoning; Resolu-
tion #86-184, Authorizing Summary and Publication)
E. RESOLUTION No. 86-149 APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE
PRIMARY ELECTION
F. 1ST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 43-86 AMENDING CITY CODE CHAP-
TER 8, SECTION 8.09, WHICH REGULATES PARKING LOTS AND RAMPS
\!4
f City Council Minutes -3- August 5, 1986
G. 1ST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 44-86 AMENDING CITY CODE CHAP-
TER 7 BY ADDING THERETO A NEW SECTION 7.08, WHICH PROHIBITS
MOTOR VEHICLES FROM USING PRIVATE PROPERTY TO AVOID TRAFFIC
CONTROL SIGNALS AND DEVICES
H. Approve plans and specifications for Dell Road and Hidden
Glen 3rd Street and Utility Improvements and authorize bids
to be received, I.C. 52-102 (Resolution No. 86-198)
I, Receive petition for street and utility improvements for
Bennett Place south of Creekridge Drive, and authorize
preparation of a feasibility study, I.C. 52-105 (Resolution
No. 86-193)
J. Final Plat approval of Feffer 2nd Addition (West of Washing-
ton Avenue, north of Hamilton Drive) Resolution No. 86-194
K. Final Plat approval for Emma Cove Addition (West of CSAH 4
and south of Baywood Lane) Resolution No. 86-195
L. Final Plat approval for Lake Park (West of CSAH 4, and south
of Timber Lake Drive) Resolution No. 86-19;
M. Approval of Burning Permit Regulations
N. Clerk's License List
0. Resolution declaring costs to be assessed and ordering prep-
aration of 1986 Special Assessment Rolls and setting hearing
date (Resolution No. 86-197)
P. Resolution approving schedule and permanent construction
for Valley View Road (Resolution No. 86-192)
Q. Resolution No. 86-199 Authorizing Execution of Supplemental
Indenture Number One with Respect to the $7,865,000 City of
Eden Prairie Multi-Family Housing Development Revenue Bonds
for Eden Pointe Apartments Project
R. Resolution No. 86-200 Authorizing Execution of Supplemental
Indenture Number One with Respect to the $41_235,000 City of
Eden Prairie Multi-Family Housing Development Revenue Bonds
for Preserve Place Apartments Project,
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve
Items A-R on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unani-
mously.
City Council Minutes -4- August 5, i986
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PRAIRIE COURTS, by Ronald A. Christenson. Request for
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Neigh-
borhood Commercial on 3.7 acres, Planned Unit Development
Concept Amendment on 37.19 acres, Planned Unit Development
District Review on 37.19 acres with variances, Zoning Dis-
. trict Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial on 3.7
acres, and Preliminary Plat of 3.7 acres into 1 lot for
construction of a 32,000 square foot commercial center.
Location: East of County Road #4, north and west of Wagner
Way. (Resolution #86-167, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amend-
ment; Resolution #86-168, PUD Concept Amendment; Ordinance
#39-86-PUD-7-86, PUD District and Rezoning; Resolution #86-
169, Preliminary Plat) A continued public hearing from
the July 15, 1986 Council meeting
Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson stated that
this item was continued from the July 15, 1986 meeting of
the City Council.
John Uban and Gary Vogel, representing proponents, addres-
sed the proposal.
Planning Director Enger said that, since the July 15th
meeting, Staff had met with the County and State Highway
Departments to present the details of the traffic study
dated July 3, 1986 conducted by Benshoof & Associates, Inc.
in order to determine whether they would consider the
temporary improvements recommended for the Hwy. 4 and 5
intersection. He reviewed some of the recommendations
from the traffic study and said that the Highway Depart-
ments agreed that the proposed temporary improvements are
feasible and desirable but that they would not be able to
participate in the cost and, further, that if the City
decided to go ahead with the temporary improvements, they
would need a resolution from the City asking the State to
do the improvements.
Enger said that, if approved, the State would be respon-
sible for doing the design and construction and that the
project would probably be scheduled for early next year.
He said the total cost for the turn-lane paving change
and the signal controller change would be approximately
$30,000. He said that the Prairie Courts proponents and
the Minnetonka State Bank proponents had been advised in
the planning stages that they would have to provide for
the improvements in order to open the facilities prior to
the permanent improvements to the intersection.
•
City Council Minutes -5- August 5, 1986
Director of Community Services Lambert said that the Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Commission reviewed the
project after the July 15th Council meeting to address
the problem of pedestrian and bicycle traffic on the east
side of Hwy 4. He said that the Parks Commission recom-
mended approval subject to the Planning Commission recom-
mendations with the addition that proponents provide for
an 8-foot asphalt trail on the east side of Hwy 4. He
said the Commission also recommended that the trail be
extended to Valley View and that Staff talk to the County
and State about putting in an overhead bicycle bridge
over Hwy 5.
Peterson asked if the State would actually let contracts
on Hwy 4 as well as Hwy 5. Enger said he was not sure on
the temporary improvements but that the State would oper-
ate as the lead agency for the permanent improvements.
Peterson then asked about the situation at Wagner Way and
Hwy 4. Enger said that the traffic study had recommended
a right-turn lane on Wagner Way and that the Planning Com-
mission was recommending proponents provide for that turn ..
lane.
Peterson then asked if the temporary improvements to Hwy 4
and 5 are expected to provide for easier left turns out of
the project. Enger said that the split-phase signal should
make the lines shorter by clearing the left-turn lanes more
rapidly and that the widening of Hwy 4 north and south of
the intersection would allow the right-turn lanes from Hwy 4
onto Hwy 5 to operate independently farther back from the
intersection.
Peterson expressed his concern that the continuous flow of
traffic from Hwy 5 north onto 4 at peak hours would make
it impossible to turn left onto Hwy 4 from Wagner Way.
Enger agreed with his concern and noted that Staff believes
that a signal light at Wagner Way should be part of the
plans for the permanent improvements and that such a sig-
nal light would help the situation.
Anderson noted that he felt the temporary improvements
would alleviate the stacking problems on Hwy 4, therefore
he believed this would produce a better situation than
currently exists at the intersection.
Redpath expressed concern about the traffic on Sheldon Ave.
and asked if a one-way section through the project had been
considered. Enger said that such a short one-way setup is
difficult to enforce and causes frustration to drivers.
•
City Council Minutes -6- August 5, 1986
p
Anderson asked about the possibility of specifying no left
turns from Wagner. Enger said he thought the situation
might be helped by prohibiting left-hand turns into Dris-
kills' southern entrance. Redpath commented that this
would seem to be restricting Driskills in favor of a new
development.
Pidcock said she thought the traffic will probably take
alternate routes such as Carnelian out of sheer frustra-
tion. She then asked 1f the traffic study had been done
on projected traffic volume when the development is com-
pleted. Enger said that it was done based on full develop-
ment of the northeast area of the intersection as currently ; ;
proposed and at the year 2000 traffic levels on Hwy 4 and
5. Pidcock then expressed concern as to whether the study
projections were based on a low growth rate. Enger res-
ponded that he felt the City was protected in this regard
because the independent traffic study was done and the
traffic projections from the proponents were not relied
on by the City.
Anderson asked if the developers had been asked to pro-
vide the estimated $30,000 for the temporary improvements
to the intersection. Enger replied that Staff had spoken
with both the Prairie Courts and the Minnetonka State Bank
developers and they indicated willingness to split the
cost.
Doug Chesney, 16272 Sheldon Ave., said that he was con-
cerned about the traffic, particularly truck traffic, on
Sheldon in view of the many children who live along that
street.
Walt Lusian, 16275 Sheldon Ave., said that he believed
Sheldon should be separated from Wagner Way in a permanent
fashion even though that would make Sheldon a cul-de-sac.
Redpath noted that if Sheldon were blocked it would be
difficult to get rescue vehicles into the residential
area.
Peterson asked if there were any other provisions that
could be made at the link and at Sheldon that would dis-
courage traffic on Wagner Way. Enger responded that they
had considered permanent blocking of Sheldon and Wagner
as well as a temporary barrier that could be used by emer-
gency vehicles, but that neither alternative would be
practical. He said he believed Sheldon had always been
expected to have quite a bit of traffic and was not ex-
pected d to be a very quiet residential street.
4
C
City Council Minutes -7- August 5, 1986
Anderson asked where the pedestrian crossing would be for
the neighborhood and if there would be a safe crossing
across Hwy 4 to the playground at Round Lake. Lambert
said the crossings would be at Valley View, Wagner and
Hwy 5 and noted that the reason for the Parks Commission
recommendation for a trail along the east side of Hwy 4
was to provide for a safe crossing to the Round Lake
facilities. Peterson asked if the section of the trail
from Sheldon to Valley View would be built at City ex-
pense. Lambert said it would.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to close
the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 86-167 approv-
ing the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment from Office to
Neighborhood Commercial on 3.7 acres. Motion carried ! _
unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt
Resolution No. 86-168 approving the PUD Concept Amendment
to the overall Gonyea 4th Addition PUD Concept on 37.19
acres. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt
I/ 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 39-86-PUD-7-86 approving the
PUD District Review on 37.19 acres with variances and
Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commer-
cial on 3.7 acres. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt
Resolution No. 86-169 approving the Preliminary Plat of
Prairie Courts for Ronald A. Christenson. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to direct
Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating
recommendations of Commissions and Staff, and including
the proposed trail along the east side of Hwy 4 and a
commitment to fund the temporary improvements to the Hwy 4
and 5 intersection as recommended by the traffic study of
July 3, 1986. Motion carried unanimously.
Redpath further recommended that Staff look into the
feasibility of making Wagner Way one-way south from Sheldon
Ave.
B. MINNETONKA STATE BANK, by Robert R. Copeland and Raymond
0. Mithun. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept
Amendment on 37.19 acres, Zoning District Change from
Al J
City Council Minutes -8- August 5, 1986
Rural to Community Commercial on 3.458 acres and Prelimi-
nary Plat of 3.458 acres into one lot for construction of
a bank building. Location: Northeast corner of Highway #5
and County Road #4. (Resolution #86-185, PUD Concept
Amendment; Ordinance #40-86, Rezoning; Resolution #86-186,
Preliminary Plat)
Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson stated notice
of this Public Hearing had been published and property
owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Don Brauer and Nick Ruehl, representing proponents, addres-
sed the proposal.
Planning Director Enger said that the Planning Commission
reviewed this project at their July 14th meeting and recom-
mended approval of the proposal on a 4-2 vote, subject to
the recommendations contained in the Staff Report of July 11,
1986. He said that the recommendations in the Staff Report
included such items as modifying the landscape plan to
provide better screening of the parking area, submit sam-
ples of proposed exterior materials for review, and submit
detailed storm water run-off plans. He said they also
recommended that the project not proceed until the Hwy 5
and 4 intersection is upgraded and that the temporary bank
facility not open until the permanent building is under
construction.
Director of Community Services Lambert said that the Parks,
Recreation and Natural Resources Commission reviewed this
project at their July 21st meeting and recommended approval
on a 6-0 vote, subject to the recommendations of the Plan-
ning Commission and Staff and subject to the developer's
providing for an eight-foot asphalt trail along the east
side of Hwy 4.
Redpath noted that he thought this project was quite an
improvement over the two fast food restaurants originally
planned for the corner.
Pidcock asked about the size of the trees in the landscape
plan. Tom Schweibert, representing proponent, said that
they are including about four times the amount of landscap-
ing required and that the plan includes a variety of types
and sizes of trees. Enger noted that the deciduous trees
would be 2-1/2 inches in diameter and the evergreens would
range from six to ten feet.
•
•
City Council Minutes -9- August 5, 1986
Peterson asked about the effect of salt from heavily
• traveled roads such as along Hwy 169 and if this problem
would occur at the intersection of Hwy 4 and 5. Enger
responded that salt spray is a problem with evergreens
but that the speed along Hwy 4 is not like Hwy 169. He
said Staff will review the evergreens along Hwy 4 to
make sure.
Peterson questioned the recommendation regarding the
temporary facility and said he thought a formula should
be devised to ensure that it is quite temporary and to
not allow delays in the building of the permanent struc-
ture since he had seen other projects begin and then get
stalled.
Redpath asked if this was the bank that was located near
the 7-Hi Shopping Center as that temporary facility was
there for a long time. Bob Wise, representing proponent,
said they were not at that location and that they are
anxious to come in with a temporary facility at the same
time they begin the permanent construction and would be
willing to abide by time constraints placed on the tem-
porary facility. A discussion of an appropriate time
period for the existence of the temporary facility follow-
41/ ed.
Dave Bowers, 15800 Valley View Road, expressed his con-
cern that the construction and design is not unique and
that this corner deserves a better quality design.
Schweibert responded that the site has required certain
design features and that The Bank is part of a larger
holding company that provides design guidelines.
Anderson noted that he thought a bank is an improvement
in the area considering the other buildings located nearby.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the
Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 86-185 approving
the PUD Concept Amendment on 37.19 acres. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve
1st Reading of Ordinance No. 40-86 for Zoning District
Change from Rural to Community Commercial on 3.458 acres.
Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt
Resolution No. 86-186 approving the Preliminary Plat of
Minnetonka State Bank for Robert T. Copeland and Raymond
41 0. Mithun. Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes -10- August 5, 1986
11
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to direct
Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating
Staff and Commission recommendations, the proposed trail
along the east side of Hwy 4, a commitment to fund the
temporary improvements to the Hwy 4 and 5 intersection as
recommended in the traffic study of July 3, 1986, and
with an 18-month limit on the temporary structure. Motion
carried unanimously.
C. MEADOWPARK 2ND ADDITION, by Spuds, Inc. Request for
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Resi-
dential to Fire Station on 3.28 acres, Zoning District
Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.84 acres and from Rural
to Public on 3.28 acres with Preliminary Plat of 9.12 acres
into 8 lots, one outlot, and road right-of-way for construc-
tion of 7 single family lots and Fire Station. Location:
East of Homeward Hills Road, north of Sunnybrook Road.
(Resolution #86-187, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment;
Ordinance #41-86, Rezoning; Resolution #86-188, Prelimi-
nary Plat) 1
Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson stated notice
of this Public Hearing had been published and property
® owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Rick Williams, representing proponents, addressed the
proposal.
Planning Director Enger said the Planning Commission re-
viewed the project at their July 14th meeting and, after
a considerable amount of discussion about the proposed
fire station site, recommended approval of the request on
a 6-0 vote, subject to the recommendations contained in
the Staff Report of July 11, 1986. He said the recommen-
dations included revising the Preliminary Plat to reflect
the appropriate location for Homeward Hills Road and
revising the grading plan to provide better drainage along
two of the rear lot lines. Enger said that recent com-
munication with NSP indicates that the fire station can
use part of the powerline easement, thus allowing a greater
setback from Homeward Hills Road than had been anticipated
at the time of the Planning Commission discussion. He
added that the issue has not been completely resolved at
this point.
Representatives of the Public Safety Dept. were available
to answer questions.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the
Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 86-187 approving
City Council Minutes -11- August 5, 1986
the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density
Residential to Fire Station on 3.28 acres. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve
1st Reading of Ordinance No. 41-86 for Zoning District
Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.,84 acres and from Rural
to Public on 3.28 acres. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt
Resolution No. 86-188 approving the Preliminary Plat of
Meadowpark 2nd Addition for Spuds, Inc. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to direct
Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating
Staff and Commission recommendations. Motion carried
unanimously.
D. PRIMETECH PHASE III, by MRTT Joint Venture. Request for
Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 20 acres,
Planned Unit Development District Review on 20 acres with
Zoning District Change from Rural to Office with variances
on 5.86 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 5.86 acres into one
lot for construction of a five-story office building.
Location: West of Highway #169, east of City West Park-
way. (Resolution #86-189, PUD Concept Amendment; Ordi-
nance #42-86, Rezoning; Resolution #86-190, Preliminary
Plat)
Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson stated notice
of this Public Hearing had been published and property
owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Ron Erickson, representing proponent, addressed the pro-
posal.
Planning Director Enger said the Planning Commission re-
viewed this project at their July 14th meeting and recom-
mended approval on a 6-0 vote, subject to the recommendations
in the Staff Report of July 11, 1986. He said the Commis- s _
sion was particularly concerned with adequate landscaping
and with the retaining wall off the south side of the build-
ing, recommending that it be tiered back to provide a break
in its massive appearance.
Peterson asked if there had been an agreement reached on
the retaining wall. Erickson responded that they have
agreed to the recommendations regarding the retaining wall
and the wall will be terraced and made of brick to match
the building.
•
City Council Minutes -12- August 5, 1986
Anderson asked if this was the last development in Prime-
tech. Enger said it was. Anderson then asked about plans
for the hill behind the project. Enger replied that that
area is owned by another party and is outside of City West.
There were no questions from the audience.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the
Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 86-189 approving
the Primetech Phase III PUD Concept Amendment to the over-
all City West PUD. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve
1st Reading of Ordinance No. 42-86 for Rezoning. Motion
carried unanimously.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt
Resolution No. 86-190 approving the Preliminary Plat of
Primetech Phase III for MRTT Joint Venture. Motion car-
ried fff
unanimously.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to direct
Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating
411 Commission and Staff recommendations, subject to the Staff
approval of the plans for the retaining wall. Motion car-
ried unanimously.
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 28574 - 28986
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the
Payment of Claims Nos. 28574 - 28986. Roll call vote:
Anderson, Pidcock, Redpath and Peterson voted "aye". Motion
carried unanimously.
VI. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request for Human Services Planning for the City of Eden
Prairie
Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson said that the g `
South Hennepin Human Services Council had convened an ad
hoc committee this spring to help assess human services ,
needs in Eden Prairie and that the information obtained
by the committee was to be used in developing proposals
to Hennepin County through identification of priority
needs in the City. He said that, after providing the in-
formation to the Human Services Council, the committee
continued to meet as a group because the members believed
•
l
•
City Council Minutes -13- August 5, 1986
a need exists in Eden Prairie for human services planning.
He said two members of the committee, Rev. Del Lind and
Virginia Gartner, were present to give brief presentations
• and to request funding for a consultant in 1987 to do
human services planning for the City. •
Rev. Del Lind reviewed the request and said that a number
of local organizations are represented in the committee.
Virginia Gartner briefly reviewed the history of human
services here and noted that the committee has concluded
that it is time to coordinate human services in the communi-
ty and to develop a long-term plan for such services.
Lind noted that the committee is concerned that we may not
be able to use the variety of resources available and that
the individual groups now serving the needs of the communi-
ty are not coordinated in their efforts. He called atten-
tion to the Report on Human Services distributed to Council
members that defined target areas of human needs in the
community. He distributed copies of the request the com-
mittee is making for funding of a consultant in the 1987
budget to study and make recommendations regarding human
services.
I/ Pidcock asked if they knew what the cost would be. Lind
replied that it would depend on how much time was spent
by the consultant. Human Resources Director Natalie Swag-
gert said that such a consultant would probably charge $65
per hour; therefore the amount to be budgeted would be
$6-$8,000 to cover the anticipated 100-150 hours required
to complete a detailed study.
Peterson asked if there had been discussion within the
group about a creative approach to provide for the needs
without giving it as the sole responsibility to the City.
Lind said that the needs have thus far been dealt with by
both the public and private sector but that historically
the public sector has done comprehensive and good social 1
planning and that he believed an important function of the
City is to provide good planning and coordination. Peter-
son said he agreed with the importance of planning for
human needs but that he hoped we could explore creative
alternatives in a partnership with the private sector.
Redpath noted that several of the local organizations in-
volved are funded by United Way and thus are programmed
to fit the thrust of that organization. He further said
that volunteers are difficult to find and that he believed
a consultant could give good suggestions for coordinating
efforts of the groups as well as providing new ideas.
City Council Minutes -14- August 5, 1986
I
Anderson said he would like to see the $6-$8,000 item
included in the 1987 budget discussions and that he felt
the report gives a starting point for the efforts and that
we can go on from there.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Redpath, to direct
Staff to prepare a consideration to be included in the
1987 budget discussion to fund a consultant on human
services needs in the community. Motion carried unani-
mously.
B. STARING PINES ADDITION, by Jerry Krebsbach. Request for
Preliminary Plat of 1.63 acres into three, R1-22 single
family lots. Location: West of East Staring Lane. (Reso-
lution #86-191, Preliminary Plat)
Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson stated notice
of this Public Meeting had been published and sent to
property owners within the project vicinity. He noted
that the property is already properly zoned and thus does
not require a Public Hearing before the Council.
Frank Cardarelle, representing proponent, addressed the
proposal.
Planning Director Enger said that the Planning Commission
reviewed this item at their July 14th meeting and recom-
mended approval on a 6-0 vote, subject to the recommenda-
tions in the Staff Report of July 11, 1986. He said that
this area does not have sewer and water at this time nor
is it required for this property. He noted that Staff
recommendations included revising the preliminary plat to
reflect the appropriate setbacks for the R1-22 zoning
district.
Redpath asked if they had considered a turnaround. Carda-
relle responded that the lots are only 100 feet wide and
there is nothing else that can be done with the existing
land.
Douglas Olsen, 9030 West Staring Lane, said that the exist-
ing lots in the area are one acre or more and expressed
his concern that the three lots together are only 1.6 acres.
Redpath said that the reason for the large lots in the
area was to satisfy the conditions for septic system and
well separation and that the assessments for sewer and
water on the large lots will be quite high.
1, Ward Olsen, 9020 Staring, said he did not think it was
appropriate to have three houses on a lot not much larger
than the neighboring lots with only one house.
i
City Council Minutes -15- August 5, 1986
Pidcock asked if the setback is 50 feet. Enger said that,
while the project would not be required to have the same
setback as the already existing houses in the area, there
is enough space on the lots to construct the houses with
the same setback. Cardarelle replied that, while it is
not a platted area, they will agree to the average setback.
Peterson asked why the lots are allowed to have smaller
frontages than the existing homes across the street. Car-
darelle reiterated that this is an unplatted area and that
once sewer and water is available the area will probably
become platted.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve
Resolution No. 86-191 approving the Preliminary Plat of
Staring Pines Addition for Jerry Krebsbach. Motion car-
ried unanimously.
At this point because of the large number of people in
the audience interested in Agenda Item IX. E. 1. regard-
ing the Edenvale Park Trail System, Mayor Peterson suggested
moving that item ahead of Item VII.
IL MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pidcock, to amend the
Agenda by moving Item IX. E. 1. to follow Item VI. B.
Motion carried unanimously.
For the purposes of continuity in the Minutes, however,
the details of the report and discussion on the Item IX.
E. 1 occur in sequence following Item IX. D, on page 17.
VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
There were no reports.
VIII. APPOINTMENTS
There were none.
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
There were no reports.
B. Report of City Manager
1. 1985 Audit Report
Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson noted that
John Brand of Fox, McCue & Murphy was present to answer
questions on the 1985 audit.
City Council Minutes -16- August 5, 1986
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to accept
the 1985 Audit Report from John Frane and the firm of
Fox, McCue & Murphy and to thank them for a job well-
done. Motion carried unanimously.
Pidcock asked Mr. Brand if he would be able to meet
with her individually to review some items. He said
he would.
2. Request from American Cancer Society
Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson referred
to his memo of August 5, 1986 that outlined the request
by the American Cancer Society for assistance with
their garage sale at the Factory Outlet Centre.
Anderson asked what the approximate cost would be for
the assistance. Dawson said that it would involve
10 to 20 hours of overtime pay, primarily for traffic
management and security during the sale.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve
the request by the American Cancer Society for assis-
tance in managing their garage sale on October 15 - 19,
1986. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Discussion relative to Financing for Kehler Hotel
Finance Director John Frane said that he had received
a call from a representative of the Kehler Corp. in
Rochester asking about the possibility of the City
using Tax Increment Financing to help develop a Kehler
Hotel on the hotel site in City West. Frane said the
representative wanted to ascertain what the reaction
was before incurring the expense of developing plans
for such a project. Frane said he called some other .
suburban communities to see if they had considered
such financing for similar projects, but none of them
had.
Pidcock asked what the pros and cons of such a process
would be. Frane replied that the positive result would
be a first class hotel in Eden Prairie, whereas the
negative results would include the similar requests that
would occur once one project such as this is approved
for T.I.F. and the fact that other hotels in the com-
munity would be unhappy with the situation.
Redpath said he thought it should be pursued because we
�' need a first-class hotel.
City Council Minutes -17- August 5, 1986
Peterson said he thought it would be important to write
up a list of stipulations and conditions that would
automatically exclude certain types of applicants.
He asked if there were any other possible negative
consequences. Frane said that we would be vulnerable
to criticism from those who don't believe in such
financing in the first place.
Anderson asked about the legality of such a proposal.
City Attorney Pauly said he would have some questions
as to how to justify such a financing proposal.
The consensus was to have them go ahead and present a
proposal for consideration.
C. Report of City Attorney
City Attorney Pauly's report was given at the special
session following the meeting.
D. Report of Director of Public Works
There was no report.
E. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Edenvale Park Trail System
Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson called
attention to the many letters and petitions received
both favoring and opposing the trail system.
Director of Community Services Lambert referred to his
letter of June 10, 1986 which was mailed to 700 residents
in the vicinity of the Edenvale Conservancy Area, noti-
fying them of the City's intention to develop a trail
and describing the trail system planned for the area.
Referring to the Staff Report of May 15, 1986 on the
subject, he said that the Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Commission reviewed the project at its July 7,
1986 meeting and recommended approval of Phase 1 on a
5-1 vote.
Lambert further noted that earlier today the City re-
ceived a copy of a petition to the Environmental
Quality Board for an Environmental Assessment Work-
sheet (E.A.W.) on the proposed creek trail system. f'
He said that, while Staff had earlier determined from
a review of the regulations that no E.A.W. was required,
the Council might see fit to approve the request for an
E.A.W. since many of the concerns expressed by the
City Council Minutes -18- August 5, 1986
residents have to do with the impact of the trail sys-
tem on the environment.
Lambert reviewed the history and the purpose of the
proposed trail system as well as the details of the
development phases planned for the trail. He said
that there appears to be three main areas of objection
to the project: the negative impact on the wildlife;
the fear of increased crime; and the invasion of pri-
vacy for nearby residents. He said that Denis Hahn,
director of the Richardson Nature Center, was present
to address concerns regarding the environmental impact
and Public Safety Director Walls and Captain Clark were
present to address concerns of safety.
Petersen suggested that members of the audience would
be heard with the understanding that if we do order in
the E.A.W. the next time comments will be received rela-
tive to the E.A.W. only. The consensus of the Council
was to agree with Peterson's suggestion.
Tom Davis, 15440 Edgewood Ct., expressed concern about
the costs for the project and distributed a map of the
11 Minn. Valley Wildlife Refuge located south of Eden
Prairie. He said that he felt this project would be a
duplication of that facility.
Mike Arends, 15480 Edgewood Ct., said he thought the
trail would present a security risk and that much of
the proposed trail will be underwater so he was con-
cerned as to how well it would hold up. He referred
to a petition circulated among residents of Edgewood
Court that dealt with several concerns including the
difficulty of enforcing no snowmobiling in the secluded
area.
Gloria Cullen, 15381 Creekside Ct., expressed concerns
about motorized vehicles having easier access from the
trail system and that Public Safety could not control
such activity along the trail.Jerry Johnson, 15801 No. Hillcrest Ct., said that he
opposed the trail system and said that he believed
there are several inadequacies about the plan. He said
he thought it was important to ascertain that there is
a public need for this development and he didn't think
there was such a need. He also opposed the development
on the basis of its location in a floodplain and said
that there are enough trails underwater in the City.
City Council Minutes -19- August 5, 1986
He was especially concerned about adverse changes to
drainage in the area, particularly on his own lot.
He said he thought the efforts would be better spent
to save and maintain the existing trails, particularly
those around Round Lake. He referred to the letter
from Pepin, Dayton, Herman, Graham & Getts and read
some of the comments regarding environmental concerns
contained in that letter which opposed a trail in the
Anderson Lakes area.
Redpath noted that the City is in the process of spend-
ing a considerable amount of money to take care of
the problems with the water level in Round Lake and
other lakes in the City.
Judy Grimm, 15330 Creekside Ct., said that when she
bought her property the land behind her belonged to
the Homeowner's Association, but it is now part of the
City and she believed the homeowners should be able to
have input on this question since it was not always
City property.
George Carlson, 16171 So. Hillcrest Ct., presented a
petition from people in the Hillcrest area and other
areas of the City who are in favor of the trail system.
(Attachment A) He said that he uses the trail systems
in Eden Prairie and other cities a lot and that he
thought an outlet from No. Hillcrest Ct. was needed
and that this proposal would provide that outlet.
Kathy Gruidl, 7052 Springhill Circle, expressed con-
cern regarding safety on the trails and related inci-
dents of indecent exposure and sexual assault on a
trail near her home.
Jay Morgan, 15501 No. Hillcrest Ct., said that, despite
his letter of July 1, 1986 in which he recommended the
bridge across the creek, he is recommending that the
City drop the proposed trail system. He said that
there are other areas with nature trails in the City
that should suffice.
James Cullen, 15381 Creekside Ct., said that he is
opposed to the trail system and expressed concern about
the wild animals in the natural portion of his property.
He presented petitions from 154 people opposing the
trail system. (Attachment B) He described a recently-
formed organization called Preserve and Protect Eden
Prairie (PEP). He also referred to his experience with
City Council Minutes -20- August 5, 1986
It
the history of the trail system proposed for the creek
corridor. He expressed his dissatisfaction with the
proceedings at the Parks Commission meeting dealing
with this issue and said he believed that the Public
Hearing process had not been followed properly.
Pidcock asked City Attorney Pauly about the charge
that the correct process for a Public Hearing had not
been followed. Pauly responded that he was not aware
of a special resolution on this issue, but that there
is no general requirement for a Public Hearing for the
establishment of a trail. He said the E.A.W. process
would provide a vehicle for a Public Hearing.
Darlene Thoen, 15361 Creekside Ct., said that she un-
•
derstood the policy of the DNR was to not favor putting
trails into wetland areas.
Werner Schulze, 15501 No. Hillcrest Ct., said that he
thought the trail system would be an asset and that
there should be a connection from No. Hillcrest Ct.
Carl Nelson, 15540 Edgewood Ct., suggested that Hill-
crest Ct. could be accessed to Round Lake rather than
11) Edenvale since Round Lake is closer to many of the
residents on Hillcrest Ct. He also expressed concern
about the safety issue since the trail is hidden from
view in many places.
Peggy Trager, 15341 Creekside Ct., expressed her opposi-
tion to the trail and said that trees that actually
were on her property line had been tagged for the trail.
Ilene Dirlam, 15241 Creekside Ct., expressed her concern
about fire and safety hazards created by the trail and
that the issue of the trail had been pre-determined.
Peterson responded that if it had been pre-determined
the Council would not have spent the last two hours
listening to the comments on the project.
Denis Hahn, Director of Richardson Nature Center,
commenting from his experience with the Hennepin County
wildlife areas, addressed the concerns expressed re-
garding the disruption of the wildlife and the possible
impact on the environment of the trail system. He said
he thought it was important to give access to areas such
as this with as little impact as possible to the environ-
ment. He noted that his observation of the area indi-
cated that it was in the stages of rapid "urbanization"
and so it would be important to develop a people manage-
ment plan to preserve the area as much as possible.
City Council Minutes -21- August 5, 1986
He suggested that the limestone trail would not be the
best surface for the trail and rather would suggest
either mowing it or using a granite aggregate. He said
that an E.A.W. might be beneficial since the area is
changing and, further, that if a trail system is de-
vised, a people management plan would be essential.
He then discussed several questions from the audience
regarding his view of the trail system and preserving
the natural areas.
Redpath said that, in view of the lateness of the hour
and the many concerns expressed by the audience, it might
be best to go with the E.A.W. City Attorney Pauly
noted that his understanding of the petition to the
E.Q.B. was for an E.A.W. on the entire Purgatory Creek
corridor to the Minnesota River. He said the E.Q.B.
will presumably transmit that petition to the City and
we will then have 15 days in which to respond and deter-
mine whether an E.A.W. is appropriate or not. He sug-
gested that it would be appropriate to allow time for
that process to occur and allow Staff time to review
and make recommendations before the Council again re-
views the issue.
Peterson thanked those who had spoken on the issue.
and said it is obvious to him that the issue is much
larger than just a trail around a small area in the
City.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pidcock, to accept
the report of the Director of Community Services and
the comments from the audience on the Edenvale Park
Trail System and to continue the item to a later date.
Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Cullen asked how the people will be notified about
the Staff determination on the E.A.W. Anderson asked
if we could set a date. Pauly described the time re-
quired for the process on a petition for an E.A.W.
A discussion followed on how long the process would
take.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pidcock, to continue
the item to the September 2, 1986 meeting of the Council.
Motion carried unanimously.
X. NEW BUSINESS
There was none.
t
::i`aY
® City Council Minutes -22- August 5, 1986
XI. ADJOURNMENT
The Council adjourned to a special session with City Attorney
Pauly to discuss matters in litigation.
S
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
September 2, 1986
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) HEATING & VENTILATING
American Remodeling, Inc. Robert Gibb & Sons, Inc.
Burko Development Preferred Mechanical Services, Inc.
Concord Builders Unique Indoor Comfort, Inc.
Construct All Corporation Y-Not Plumbing & Heating
Dolphin Construction
Job Erection & Engineering
Methodist Hospital GAS FITTER
Northwest Raquet Club
Metro Gas Installers
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY)
PLUMBING
Bernhagen Britk, Inc.
Brossard Homes, Inc. Wayne Dauwalter Plumbing
Christy Construction Co. T. H. Denison Plumbing
Cornerstone Builders of Wayzata Dolder Plumbing & Heating
Daco, Inc. Donahue Plumbing
lip Dundee Nursery & Landscaping Co. Robert Gibb & Sons, Inc.
Franzen Construction Co. Y-Not Plumbing & Heating.
Hustad Development
Landscape Creations
Lenzen Construction WELL DRILLING
Mischke Builders, Inc.
Nature's Way Robert E. Stodola Well, Inc.
Noonan Construction
Dutdoor Development PRIVATE KENNEL
PACA Builders
Pacific Pool & Patio Ken & Mary Kunstmann
Sylvester Construction, Inc.
Peddlar
Donald Allen Brill (firewood)
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for
the licensed activity. _
ed
Pat o ie, Licensing
I
- r
•
CITY OF EDFN PRAIRIE
HFNNFPIN COUNTY, MINNFSOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-223
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
WFSTWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of Westwood Industrial Park 2nd Addition has been submitted
in a.manner required for platting land under the Fden Prairie Ordinance Code
and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been
duly had thereunder; and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Fden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BF IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDFN
PRAIRIEc
A. Plat approval request for Westwood Industrial Park 2nd
Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation
of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated August 25,
1986.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the
above named plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on September 2, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST SEAL
a..
John D. Frane, Clerk
,1-
•
C •
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician (�7,,�
DATE: August 25, 1986
•
SUBJECT: WESTWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION
PROPOSAL:
Hoyt Development has requested City Council approval of the
final plat of Westwood Industrial Park 2nd Addition. This is
a replat of Lot 2, Block 1, Westwood Industrial Park which
contains 4.58 acres. The division will result in 2 lots
containing 2.08 acres (Lot 1) and 2.50 acres (Lot 2).
HISTORY: •
Zoning to I-2 Park was finally read and approved by the City
Council on December 15, 1981, per Ordinance 81-20.
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on June
3, 1986, per Resolution 86-127.
The Developer's Agreement executed on December 15, 1981, and
the Owner's Supplement executed on January 14, 1982, apply to
this division.
VARIANCES:
All variance requests must be processed through the Board of
Appeals.
UTILITIFS AND STREETS:
All municipal utilities and streets necessary to serve this
division have been installed. All on-site utility and roadway
extensions will be privately owned and maintained.
PARK DEDICATION:
Park dedication shall conform to City Code requirements.
BONDING:
Bonding shall conform to City Code requirements.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of the final plat of Westwood Industrial
Park 2nd Addition subject to the requirements of this report,
the Developer's Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $460.
DLO:sg
cc: Mr. Brad Hoyt, Hoyt Development
Mr. Ron Krueger, Krueger & Assoc.
1
•
CITY OF FDFN PRAIRIE
HENNFPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-224
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
LAKF PARK 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS,the plat of Lake Park 2nd Addition has been submitted in a manner
required for platting land under the Fden Prairie Ordinance Code and under
Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had
thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State.of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BF IT RFSOLVFD BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN`
PRAIRIE;
A. Mat approval request for Lake Park 2nd Addition is approved
upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
report on this plat dated August 25, 1986.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the
above named plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on September 2, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
•
�;11J�
CITY OF FDFN PRAIRIE
FNGINEFRING RFPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician • •
DATE: August 25, 1986
SUBJECT: LAKE PARK 2ND ADDITION
PROPOSAL:
The developer, the Rottlund Company, has requested City
Council approval of the final plat of Lake Park 2nd Addition.
The plat is located west of County Rd #4 and south of Timber
Lake Drive in the North 1/2 of Section 17. The site contains
14.33 acres to be divided into 11 multi-family townhouse lots
and 1 outlot. Dutlot A contains 11.95 acres and will be
developed at a later date.
HISTORY:
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council July 1,
1986, per Resolution 86-158.
Second reading of Ordinance 34-86, amending zoning within an
RM 6.5 District, was finally read and approved at the August
5, 1986, City Council meeting. The Developer's Agreement
referred to within this report was executed August 5, 1986.
VARIANCFS:
All variance requests must be processed through the Board of
Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
Privately owned and maintained sanitary sewer and water main
are in place and available to serve this plat. The developer
will be responsible for installing streets and storm sewer, a _
both of which will be privately owned and maintained.
As part of the overall development plan, a 16" trunk water
main is to be constructed through the project. The developer
will be required to construct this water main with the City to .
participate in the cost of oversizing the pipe. This water
main does not affect this phase, but will be made a
requirement of subsequent phases. !!
Prior to release of the final plat, a special assessment d '
agreement covering the construction of a park access road to
the future Miller Park must be signed.
a1'70
• Page 2, Final Plat of Lake Park 2nd Addition 8/25/86
PARK DEDICATION:
Park dedication shall conform to City Code requirements.
BONDING:
Bonding shall be in conformance with City Code requirements.
RFCOMMFNDATION:
Recommend approval of the final plat of Lake Park 2nd Addition
subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's
Agreement,and the following:
1. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $440.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $359.
3. Execution of special assessment agreement regarding
construction of park access road to Miller Park.
JJ:sg
cc: Mr. Al Kremer, Suburban Engineering
Rottlund Company
S
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 86-225
RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTION ON BAKER ROAD
CSAH 60 FROM CSAH 62/67 TO ROBERTS DRIVE
In the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
THIS RESOLUTION passed this 2nd day of September, 1986, by the City of Eden
Prairie in Hennepin County, Minnesota.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Hennepin County has planned the improvements of CSAH 60 (Baker Road)
from CSAH 62/67 to Roberts Drive (County Project 8312);
WHEREAS, Hennepin County will be expending County State Aid Funds on the (.
improvement of said street;
WHEREAS, approval of the proposed construction as a State Aid project must be
conditioned upon certain parking restrictions; and
111 WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be a necessary
prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a State Aid project in
the "City" has been determined.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED:
That the "City" shall prohibit the parking of motor vehicles on both sides at
all times.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 2, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: City Manager Carl J. Jullie
FROM: Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson
SUBJECT: Amendment to Transit Agreement
DATE: August 28, 1986
The City of Chanhassen has requested that another provision be included in
the Southwest Area Transit Commission joint powers agreement. This
provision would state:
"Without the prior written approval of the Councils of
the parties to this Agreement, the Commission shall not
purchase buses, motor vehicles, buildings, real estate or
lease the same for a period in excess of five years."
This provision recapitulates provisions in State l.aw and underscores the
intent that transit services be provided under contract. The City
1 Attorneys approve of the language. The Commission recommended approval of
the amendment at its August 20, 1986 meeting.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council approve the proposed.
amendment and authorize execution of the appropriate document.
CWD:CJJ:jdp
Attachment
•
FIRST AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
ESTABLISHING A SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION
S
THIS AMENDMENT to the Joint Powers Agreement Establishing
the Southwest Area Transit Commission, is made and entered into
this day of , 1986, by and between the Cities
of. Eden Prairie, Chanhassen, and Chaska, all being municipal corpo-
rations organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, pursuant
to authority conferred upon the parties by Minnesota Statutes §
174.265, Minnesota Statutes § 473.384, § 473.388, and/or Minnesota
Statutes § 471.59.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, in consideration of the
mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, it is hereby
agreed by and between the Cities of Eden Prairie, Chaska, and Chan-
hassen, through their respective City Councils, that paragraph
6 of the Joint Powers Agreement Establishing the Southwest Area
Transit Commission is amended by adding the following provision:
M. Without the prior written approval of the Councils
of all parties to this Agreement, the Commission shall
not purchase buses, motor vehicles, buildings, real
estate or lease the same for a period in excess of
five years.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
BY:
Its
BY:
Its
Approved by the City Council
of Eden Prairie this
day of , 1986.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
BY:
Its
BY:
Its
Approved: by the City Council
of Chanhassen this day
of , 1986.
CITY OF CHASKA
BY:
Its
BY:
Its
Approved by the City Council
of Chaska this day of
, 1986.
•
rt r'
I MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
DATE: August 29, 1986
SUBJECT: Policies for Preservation of Significant Natural Features
At the July 15,1986, City Council meeting, the Staff was directed to look into the
possibility of regulations which which would help prevent the destruction of
significant natural resources throughout the City which is possible with land
development. The Planning Staff has identified three areas of natural resources
where it may be possible to set out objective standards above and beyond the current
site specific development review. Wetlands, significant hills and slopes, and
forests are the three areas most often affected by development and most commonly
perceived as significant natural resources. These features are protected currently
through the normal site plan review process outlined in City Code. However, the
Council has asked the Staff to determine whether quantifiable standards, or ranges
of standards, could be set to assure more consistency of review from project to
project.
ILWetlands
Type 2 and Type 3 wetlands, two acres in size, or greater, are protected by
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) at this time. Although some development work
may be done within these wetland areas, it is only through the permitting process of
the DNR, where the purpose is to preserve them for wildlife habitat. Two acres is
the minimum size for classification of protected wetlands because this was the
smallest size that the DNR could accurately identify when it classified wetlands in
their 1974 aerial photographic work.
If the DNR is asked to visit a site which is a suspected Type 2 or 3 wetland they
may determine that it is, indeed, a wetland. There are many different
classifications of wetlands designated by the DNR. However, only the Type 2 and 3
are deemed as significant enough of a natural resource to require a permitting
process. That does not mean, though, that because a pond, or wetland, is too small
to be classified as a protected water that it is not significant. If the City
wishes to be more restrictive than the DNR classification, the City must adopt some
sort of objective standard for preservation of wetlands.
The size of the pond or wetland, the type of wetland vegetation, the depth of any
standing water, and the value of the wetland area in the storm water chain could all
be factors that the City would consider in attempting to define objective standards
for preservation of different types of wetlands.
Hills and Slopes
Hills and slopes may be considered to be significant natural resources depending
upon their steepness, height, size, and topographic context. For example, a hill
that exists on a 20-acre, parcel which is mostly flat may be more significant than a
hill of the same size occurring on a parcel surrounded with larger land forms. By
the same token, a hill covered with a mature stand of oak trees may be more valuable..
than a hill of the same size which is not covered with significant vegetation. The
City will`.also need to study the height of the hill, the degree of slope, and the
topographic context in order to reach a fair and objective standard for preservation
of these natural features.
Trees.
Since the July 15, 1986, City Council meeting, the Staff has reviewed new
subdivision projects with the idea of trying to extend the policy of tree
replacement, formerly implemented only for multiple family residential projects and
commercial projects, to single family subdivisions. The Bluestem Addition by the
Brown Company, lying on the east side of Purgatory Creek, recently reviewed by the
Council, is the first example of a single family subdivision in which the,City
required tree replacement of trees twelve inches in caliper,` or greater on an
caliper inch per caliper inch basis.
This same 100% replacement policy may not make sense in all situations. For
example, a site which is almost wholely wooded would not be able to be developed as
a'subdivision if a 100% tree replacement policy were required. By the same token, a
certain percentage of the trees may be able to be removed without significantly
affecting the site character. Staff would like to pursue the idea of a policy that
would allow a certain percentage of the vegetation on-a site to be removed without
tree replacement and, thereafter, some maximum allowable percentage which may be
removed from the site, with tree replacement on an caliper inch per caliper inch
1111 basis. Clearly more work needs to be done on the size of trees to be replaced, the
species, and the overall character of a site before such a policy can be adopted.
Conclusion
Although the Staff has done considerable thinking with regard to natural resource
preservation policies, we feel that an additional 90 days would be helpful to
further develop and quantify our thoughts. At that time, we would expect to return
to the Council and suggest adoption of natural resource protection policies which
could be utilized as development guidelines over a trial period of time. At the end
of that trial period, an evaluation of the process would be made to determine if
changes in the policies were needed, or if the policies could be appropriately
included in the City's Code.
11-)')
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services'741-
DATE: August 25, 1986
SUBJECT: Bicycle/Pedestrian Overpass State Highway 5/County Road 4
Intersection
The existing bituminous pathway adjacent to County Road 4 requires a
pedestrian or individual on a bicycle to cross both Highway 5 and County Road
4 at the intersection of County Road 4 and State Highway 5. This presently is
a dangerous crossing due to the high speed of traffic along Highway 5, the
slip ramps that must be crossed where traffic does not stop, and the brief
length of the signal light for north/south traffic. When this intersection is
improved it will become even wider and, therefore, more dangerous to cross.
As the City grows and development occurs to the west of Eden Prairie, the
traffic at this intersection will continue to increase. Many people presently
do not allow their children to cross Highway 5 due to these dangerous
conditions. When the intersection is upgraded even more people will hesitate
to allow elementary age children to cross at this location.
The State Highway Department policies state that "A freeway must not impose
upon an area, a barrier disruptive to normal community activities. Provisions
for adequate local circulation back and forth across the facility is,
therefore, an essential element of freeway development." It is the contention
of the Community Services Staff that when Highway 5 is upgraded, and the
intersection of County Road 4 is improved, it will be extremely dangerous to
cross the slip ramp and the length of Highway between lights for adults and
pedestrians and would be inadviseable for children, therefore, causing a
barrier disruptive to normal community activities.
City staff has requested the State Highway Department to provide cost
estimates for a pedestrian overpass over State Highway 5 at the intersection
of County Road 4. Their original estimate is approximately $300,000 to
$325,000, and their initial review indicates they would not participate in the
cost of this structure.
The State is very hesitant to construct any overpasses that are not likely to
be used. The design of the bridge is the key to whether or not the bridge is
used. It should only be constructed if it is more convenient and quicker to
use the bridge than it would be to follow the roadway. The major reason most
of these types of crossings are not used is the "up and down movement
required"; however, due to the terrain at this intersection it appears as
though an overpass beginning just north of the Burger King entrance could be
constructed with less than an 8% grade and with a touchdown point short of
Wagner Way.
Staff recommend the City Council approve a resolution requesting the State
Highway Department to include a pedestrian overpass in the County Road 4/State
Highway 5 intersection improvement, and that the State consider including the
cost in that portion of the project.
BL:md
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-222
RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO INCLUDE A
PEDESTRIAN OVERPASS OVER STATE HIGHWAY 5 WITH THE PROPOSED COUNTY ROAD 4/STATE
HIGHWAY 5 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has constructed a 8' wide bituminous
walkway/bikeway adjacent to County Road 4, and
•
WHEREAS, this hikeway/bikeway receives a high amount of pedestrian and
bicycle use, especially during the school year, due to the proximity of the
high school and the middle school, and
WHEREAS, County Road 4 is a major segement in the pedestrian/bicycle
transportation system for the City, and
WHEREAS, the existing intersection is extremely dangerous for. pedestrian
or bicycle use, and
WHEREAS, the proposed improvement will precipitate this dangerous
condition for individuals using the trail system, and
WHEREAS, the existing grades in this location will facilitate a
pedestrian crossing with a minimum amount of undue up and down movement, and
WHEREAS, the projected amount of increased traffic on Highway 5 will
create an even higher degree of intolerable conditions for a pedestrian
crossing in this location,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie does hereby request the Minnesota Highway Department to include a
pedestrian bridge as part of the intersection improvement of State Highway 5
and County Road 4;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie
does hereby request the Department of Transportation share in the cost of this
bridge to an amount not to exceed 75% of the cost of the structure, as per
Highway Department basic policies and procedures 5-105.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 2nd day of
September, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL
21'19
MEMORANDUM
T0: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services t_
DATE: August 26, 1986
SUBJECT: Bike/Pedestrian Bridge Across the C.M.SP.P. and P. Railroad Tracks
In 1979; the City began construction of an 8' asphalt bike/pedestrian trail
adjacent to County Road 4, from County Road 1 north. This trail ended on the
northern boundary of City property in Round Lake Park. The trail was planned
for extension all the way to County Road 62 on the Eden Prairie/Minnetonka
border; however, the inability to provide a safe crossing over the railroad
tracks north of Valley View Road has caused this project to be delayed.
Since 1980, the City has received numerous calls from residents north of Duck
Lake Trail inquiring as to when the trail will be extended. The City staff
response has always been that the trail would be extended as soon as the
County upgraded the bridge across the railroad tracks, and provided the City
with a safe bike/pedestrian crossing.
Two years ago a woman was seriously injured when attempting to ride a bicycle
along the raised 2' wide walkway adjacent to the vehicle lane. At that time,
the City Engineer requested the Hennepin Department of Transportation to
11/ provide an acceptable bike/pedestrian walkway in that location. The County
indicated there was not any funding available for that request and the bridge
improvement was not in the five year capital improvement program.
Earlier this year, Ms. Marlou Brekke, 16460 Baywood Lane, contacted the
Director of Community Services requesting information on when the bike path
would be extended to Duck Lake Trail. Upon hearing about the problem with the
bridge, Ms. Brekke then wrote a letter to Dennis Hanson, County Traffic
Engineer. Mr. Hanson responded in a July 9th letter that bicycle and
pedestrian trail systems are basically the responsibility of municipalities
and that occasionally the County does have some capital improvement funds
allocated for bike/ped trail development. He indicated that the staff were
including $110,000 in their 1987 budget request for this purpose and this
amount has not been designated for any specific project. If approved by the
County Board, it would be available to municipalities on a first come first
served basis.
Upon receiving a copy of his response to Ms. Brekke, the Director of Community
Services then requested Mr. Hanson to review the estimated cost to widen the
existing bridge to provide two 12' wide driving lanes, plus an 8' wide
shoulder on each side. The cost of the improvement would be approximately
$1D0,000.
The Director of Community Services also requested the County to determine the
estimated cost to construct a separate structure removed from the existing
( bridge. Mr. Hanson indicated a steel truss timbered deck bridge, about 180'
long and 8' wide would cost approximately $5D,D00. "Such bridge, presumably
constructed west of the existing bridge, would have to be placed so that it
would not interfere with possible future CSAH 4 upgrading."
fL)
"The County's preference would be the separate bridge structure. This would
• maintain the detached trail concept presently functioning: south along CSAH 4.
Bike/pedestrian facilties adjacent to the roadway (in the form of a shoulder)
have disadvantages, safety wise. This has been a complaint of users along
some of our present facilities, even those in Eden Prairie."
The Community Services Staff believe the section of trail along County Road 4,
from Valley View Road north to County Road 62 is a critical segment of the
bicycle/pedestrian transportation system. This segment of trail could be
constructed`:(including the separate bridge structure across the railroad
tracks) for approximately $100,000-$120,000. The Community Services Staff
request authorization to submit a request to the County Transportation
Department for a trails grant for this purpose.
BL:md
•
'.I
Primetech Phase III
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 42-86
AN DROINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM DNE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMDNG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY CDUNCIL DF THE CITY DF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Dffice District.
Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be,
and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
Office District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to,in
City Code, Section 11.D3, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended
accordingly.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of
that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of September 2, 1986, entered into
between MRTT Joint Venture, a Minnesota general partnership, and the City of Eden
Prairie, which Agreement is hereby made a part hereof.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of.Eden
Prairie on the 5th day of August, 1986, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 2nd day of
September, 1986.
ATTEST:
John O. Trane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
Exhibit A
ZONING & PLATTING
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Outlot B. PRIMELAND 3R0 ADDITION. except that part described as follows: Beginning at the
most southerly corner of said Outlot 8. said point being on the northwesterly right-of-way
line of U.S. Highway 169; thence North 61°00'22" West 314.88 feet along the southwest Tine
of said Outlot B to the Southwest corner thereof; thence North 34°20'50" East 106.46 feet
along the west line of said Outlot B; thence South 61°00'22" East 304.95 feet to the
southeast line of said Outlot B; thence South 28°59'38" West 106.00 feet along said line to
the point of beginning.
CONCEPT AMENDMENT & DISTRICT REVIEW •
That part of Outlot 8"CiTT WEST. according to the recorded plat
.thereof. Hennepin-tgunly, Minnesota, lying Northeasterly of the
follo.ring described line:
•
Commencing at the rest southeasterly corner of said
Outlet B; thence ttorth 36'42'37' East,assured bearing
along the southeasterly lice of said Outlet B. a
distance of 65.34 feet to the easterly line of said
Outlot B; thence Scrth 0'13'23" West. along the easterly
line of said.Outlot`8, a distance of 99.74 feet to-the
southeasterly line of said Outlot B thence North 4,5'44,
29' Fast, along the southeasterly line of said Outlot B.
'a distance of 393.C3 feet to the point of beginning of
line to be described; thence North 43'25'04" west a
distance of 684.83 feet to the westerly line of said
Outlet B and there said line terminates,
and lying etsterly, southeasterly and southerly of the folicbdng
d:scribed line:
Beginning at a point on the northerly line of said
Outlet B. distant 335 feet oesterly of the most
easterly line of said Ou:iot B as reesured-along
said northerly lire; thence South 49'12'44" West a
distance of 115 feet; Whence South 16'29'35' East
a distance of 120 feet; thence South 69'11'18"West
a distance of 410 feet; thence South 45'15'26' West
a distance of 125 feet to the westerly line of said
Outlot G and there said line terminates. For the
purpose of this description said northerly line is '
assu.d to have a bearing of North C3'20.34' West.
•
Tccether with that `end to be acquired from the State of Minnesota
lying easterly of and adjacent to the abo%e described pro,erty
Chich lies bst..een the southeasterly extension of the sojth-
srrstcrty line and the easterly extension of said northerly line
of the shove described property.
i G
•
Primetech Park Phase III
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1986, by
MRTT Joint Venture, a Minnesota general partnership, hereinafter referred to as
"Developer," and the CITY OF .EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter`
referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept
Amendment for 20 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review of 20 acres, with
variances for parking setback and building height, Zoning District Change from Rural
to Office and Preliminary Plat for 5.86 acres, for construction of an office'
building, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter
® referred to as "the property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #42-86,
Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of
said property as follows:
1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the
materials revised and dated 1986, reviewed and approved
by the City Council on August 5, 1986, and attached hereto as
Exhibit 8, subject to such changes and modifications as provided
herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain
the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by
Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of
all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Developer agrees to notify the City and the Watershed District at
least 48 hours in advance of any grading, or tree removal, on the
property.
•
Prior to issuance of any permit for grading upon the property,
10 Developer agrees to implement erosion control measures and adequate
protective measures for areas to be preserved and areas where
grading is not to occur, and to receive City approval of said
measures. Prior to approval by the City, the Developer must call
for on-site inspection of the property by the City, and defects in
materials and workmanship in the implementation of said measures
shall then be determined by the City. Defects in materials or
workmanship shall then be corrected by the Developer, reinspected
and approved by the City prior to issuance of the grading permit by the City. Approval of materials and workmanship may be subject to
such conditions as the City may impose at the time of acceptance.
4. Developer agrees to confine grading to that area of the property
within the construction limits as shown on Exhibit B. Developer
shall place snow fencing at the construction limits within the
wooded areas of the property prior to any grading upon the property.
Prior to issuance of any grading permit, Developer shall submit •to
the Director of Planning and receive the Director's approval of a
tree inventory of those trees within the construction area and
within 25 ft. outside of the construction area, indicating the size,
type, and location of all trees twelve (12) inches in diameter, or
greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground level.
If any such trees are removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the
construction area, Developer agrees that prior to issuance of any
110 building permit for the property, Developer shall submit to the
Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of a
replacement plan for all trees removed, damaged, or destroyed
outside of the construction area. Developer further agrees that
said trees shall be replaced by similar tree species and that the
trees used for replacement shall be no less than six inches in
diameter. The amount of trees to be replaced shall be determined by
the Director of Planning, using a square inch per square inch basis,
according to the area of the circle created by a cross sectional cut
through the diameter of a tree as measured 4.5 feet above the
ground.
If a tree replacement plan is required, Developer agrees that, prior
to issuance of any building permit, to submit a bond, or letter of
credit, guaranteeing completion of all tree replacement work as
approved by the Director of Planning. The amount of the bond, or
letter of credit, shall be 150% of the approved estimated cost of
implementation of all tree replacement work and shall be in such
form and contain such other provisions and terms as may be required
by the Director of Planning. Developer agrees to prepare and submit
for approval to the Director of Planning a written estimate of the
costs of the tree replacement work to be completed.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall
implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements listed
above in said plans, as approved by the Director of Planning.
•
;.i2
5. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City
Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water,
storm sewer, and erosion control for the property.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or
cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said
plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit
C, attached hereto.
6. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property,
Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the
Director's approval of:
A. Detailed plans indicating the method and materials to be
used for screening of mechanical equipment.
B. Detailed plans indicating the materials and style of
lighting for the property.
C. Detailed plans indicating the materials and style of signage
for the property.
D. Detailed plans and samples of exterior materials, indicating
consistency with the other buildings within the Planned Unit
Development.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer agrees to
implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements and
materials listed above in said plans, as approved by the Director of
Planning.
7. Concurrent with installation of landscape materials on the property,
Developer agrees to construct, or cause to be constructed, a five-
foot wide, five-inch thick concrete sidewalk along the southwest
portion of the property adjacent to the private loop road, as
depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
8. Developer acknowledges that the property will benefit from any
future improvements to Shady Oak Road in the vicinity of City West
and agrees to pay its fair share of the corresponding special
assessments.
9. Developer agrees that the property shall be part of the overall City
West Owners' Association.
Primetech Phase III
I/ CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-234
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE 42-86 ANO ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 42-86 was adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of September,
1986; ,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 42-86, which is
attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said
text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said
ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
111
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 42-86 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein,
within 20 days after said publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on September 2, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
I
Primetech Phase III
CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
OROINANCE NO. 42-86
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LANO FROM ONE
ZONING OISTRICT ANO PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,
WHICH,- AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, OROAINS:
Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located west of
Highway #169, east of City West Parkway, known as Primetech Phase III from the Rural District to the Office District, subject to the terms and conditions of a
developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full
legal description of this property.
mih
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
/s/John 0. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson
City Clerk Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the _day of , 1986.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
It
•
a1�d }
Windsong
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 37-86
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that..the land be
removed from the Rural District and be placed in the RM-6.5 District.
Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be,
and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
RM-6.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in
City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended
accordingly.
IL Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of
that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of September 2, 1986, entered into
between Koosman and Rice Company, a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Eden
Prairie, which Agreement is hereby made a part hereof.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 15th day of July, 1986, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 2nd day of
September, 1986.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
t9
c ( Exhibit A
WXNDSONG REZONING DESCRIPTION
That part of the ' Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of
Section 15, Township 116, Range 22, described as follows:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Southeast Quarter;
thence South 0 degrees 30 minutes 37 seconds East, on an
assumed bearing, along the West,line of said Southeast Quarter,
a distance of 360.00 feet to the point of beginning of the land
to be described; thence North`89 degrees 29 minutes 23 seconds ,
East a distance of 285.00 feet; thence_South 23 degrees 00-
minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 170.00 feet; :thence:North'
83 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of,245.00
feet; thence Soutn 58 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East a
distance of 170.00 feet; thence`South 20 degrees 00 minutes 00•`
seconds West a distance of 195.00 feet; thence South 60 degrees
30 minutes 00 seconds West a distance" of.'160.00-feet; thence`
South 49 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of
230.00 feet; thence South 25 degrees 00 minutes 00 'seconds West.
a distance of 340.00 feet more or less to the South line or '
said Nortnwest Quarter of the,Southeast Quarter; thence:'South-
89 degrees 43 minutes 31 seconds West along said South line a
distance of 440.00 (feet; thence Northwesterly to a point on the
West line of said Southeast Quarter distant 291.99 feet South
or the point of beginning tnence North 0 degrees 30 minutes 37
seconds West, along said West line a distance of 291.99 feet to:
the point of beginning.
11„, PLATTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
-
Tne Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 15,
Township 116, Range 22 West, Hennepin County.
Windsong
•
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1986, by
Koosman and Rice Company, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept
and Planned Unit Development District Review on 39.62 acres, Zoning District Change
from Rural to RM-6.5 on 12.03 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 39.62 acres into 20
lots and six outlots for construction of 72 multi-family units clustered into
eighteen four-plex lots, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully
described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage
4 hereinafter referred to as "the property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #37-86,
Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of
said property as follows:
1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the
materials revised and dated , 1986, reviewed and approved
by the City Council on July 15, 1986, and attached hereto as Exhibit
8, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein.
Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the
property in any other respect or manner than provided herein.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by
Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of
all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Prior to issuance of the final building permit on the property, ,
Developer agrees to dedicate to the City, free and clear of any.
liens, mortgages, charges, claims, or other encumbrances, Outlot G,
as depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto.
vr;191
4. Prior to issuance of any permit for grading upon the property,
developer agrees to submit to the Director of Planning, and receive
the Director's approval of, an overall plan designating a general
land use for the norther portion of the property.
5. Developer shall notify the City and the Watershed District 48 hours
prior to any grading, tree removal, or tree cutting on the property.
6. Concurrent with utility construction, Developer agrees to construct
a five-foot wide, five-inch thick concrete sidewalk around the
exterior of the circle, or the loop road, system with a connection `!
to a proposed five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Chestnut Drive
which shall also be built.
7. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City
Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water,
storm sewer, and erosion control for the property.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or
cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said
plans, as•approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit
C, attached hereto.
8. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property,
Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the
Director's approval of detailed plans for signage and lighting on
the property.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer agrees to
implement, or cause to be implemented, those plans listed above as
approved by the Director of Planning.
L
dZ 192,
Windsong
CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-203
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF OROINANCE 37-86 ANO OROERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 37-86 was adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of September,
1986;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EOEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 37-86, which is
attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds ;;that said
text clearly. informs the public of the intent and effect of said
ordinance.
8. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
41
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 37-86 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
along with proof of publication required by paragraph 8 herein,
within 20 days after said publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on September 2, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
- j
John D. Frane, City Clerk
•
C
.
Windsong
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 37-86
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN .PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING'OISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located west of
Purgatory Creek, east of Chestnut Drive, known as Windsong, from the Rural District
to the RM-6.5 District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's
agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal
description of this property.
" Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
/s/John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson
City Clerk Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of 1986.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
i9y
Shady Oak Ridge
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 38-86
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY DF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZDNING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the RM-6.5 District and be placed in the R1-13.5 and Rural Districts.
Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be,
and hereby is removed from the RM-6.5 District and shall be included hereafter in
the R1-13.5 and Rural Districts, and the legal descriptions of land in each District
referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be,
and are amended accordingly.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of
that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of September 2, 1986, entered into
between Joseph Ruzic, an individual, and the City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement
is hereby made a part hereof.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its .
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 15th day of July, 1986, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 2nd day of
September, 1986.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PU8LISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
Exhibit A
mutt! ( (
•fgfat 11..Tp£ j' Ii:tigifFflififfgf'ifg:ffi::1 € 9Ft:ieia_'rl,:glint€T5TiWi4iLfgfifgififi i
,$ _E g „F i`:i t"-a'"1!a" _a"rtr i iaig• fsj__ ia g g•raaf=a=: • a3:ap a=ara^. ; saz :.fiia:.z t
-Oil p ffii° tja f -! ` ??i.€rf:sg$iz `^.31 a Lfa- i" fa v e s•;° " : _IC'S S� .I 5Ii
4 :� Y+a?a�iif_3�` fi�eig,^f.Efi1
ig fR=.: qfiq _: a=azfi;°:i.a" iif g°catia ;afla fix i1i fig. ftJ!! iiaJiii ! finsifa:I_r-i.1 0 Wg xix.i kleil it __ as
441i IL:i=eialF±iiicf1ijs _aiiiilfrgfi'fa_`fiR; - fa-5=!iitfa^is:££;gss=?a&iii'5.i :fi•Yi'o"
a: g It-3 a^c = "ex; r"-. 57ta: it4r. _. x •i^_ -
a f fr i¢jff3:xgag:"' •: of:" ;Iia• fa, ftr. Tis_2SZ r3Z3 a,,,s- i zsis.g¢pr •3.•i,
_ _£-� .ss .3: if :i- .i
e1r ii-_i:z_,rt ,!ot,girifs11%,.Lis3e-::x3yiearz agz°S_ iiFir=ifI asf! II:"F •R:1"--:
i c.'f a ap?g=x•.iI>'f:_'egg.;g:pan-iiltiia.3i:gf er ?gE •'iei•f3^Se £ i°ieirrgiii3:'4iF£"r
it'll ff6 fE 'f'agifeffaF.it:::i =a;ai a'3 :, ;f f sgzfar^si€.fi. fpsa g�x== ;a
it'll -..rti%2 aigai?fs s;x=i:iri,;fii r. 3ygf :afE=fs r3^iaiffi•8f iia'ii=fig}as-i3"aii
fig P01,Fl3 ` :aa Erh' •fi:i= 1xxa-: g: =fas 3"'.^°:fit :Fa -5f'%"tins =xai =g-
x _ _g'_ 3 gz' r ;
It! . iLi:- i•i'sgs4?2/et—g:cfaii-g;::?g a_:$ if tittv!r..q....M.12: I f iri:13.3' i."
r f3 arrlf 2i£ii- ;ciicaaE^ zc.s p ns'=1fi 1 ^ x3,�si.f: •a: i 3t:iffgi sari:tia siinc
f ' 3.a ai:.fc•r .`fg aag3 r...Wa xa '':g=ex Mt::a -','-•-4:fv,' i1;110x: gxax
Eiljt aifaai:a:•.:-giaV ti:: iiVli s''=gi4'21' S2 ii_i- "stela€ i=^' p;i1xfli• i [j=iiis
a"0.a i ;:. _boot. 6s"p•-0:::: .e e' :c. :air%i' ?a'sv •.i4.::-- i:fiitc•:"'-
.a- fgiTI t r.-trE ea '.'' i:- i• .i:] ;i 'fg H i .-S33i:--: f:i a-•?i':f:ii.i:i-gf
7fl" ;;raarFfx -::: faf' f:if?s.- ° c e =aci=: ,tart f±£=a;=f" pi -
=tfa -"x:.. - - 3S"s:as-• _a.rf? i 1: c - . •'a- 3gi: a.� it :0" -
r=ff i• 6 :tE-5rr:ici- :S.? ff'.--.C;e .i i3 i? °gf 'gsg'x '.a - t:irtlfesfr^Eis:ji'1.t",
Fs: C: i fx ,'dgi a• r.1...-.:ca s TZ... j :! - -
a13 nagy . :s: .af;iia = ^ - .. xr •
: stc. . J :8 aS 3t _.s,s,3, cgS4i-2 ' i : ciA =i:= t5
'•a x G-a`- ."c:afi f.'._.5:3•._-.:k ir'at=a,i -f:a s?3f.".'^,:fi f5_fgK'•a::i_.k�'a ai if
�4�?aa = : fib: xf� 'f rrr - .8Ga
"
: 4 3 x^ '. ... a
Z ^bax . a= :B ^ W eSg ' "-li a• .4'1a0 '.3 . ^ S,''^S..: z- ^S;s _ a- .n -iS1-:
n
-sa ;:zcsa: oa . i 3s^ll,g3 -.c : :f si..t ag s:2:- p' -. . ; e : ir -▪te
▪r•szi
_ zcei s:-= i lt,1g J''-fs--t -.--- • _ g;= a_
__ - f ;-.;i::;_�2 5s2:_' :a 3is$..i-:. :fcs, ^ itiltla
; ;x ; Y ga l ?S'^^:.3.52 ;eft`.`"';f' i!iT
_ i fei
x -gai.a y.15 •.e-ii-a - 'aka".
-giE i YES::f fot!a' : ;a. _ -f^f --s .. •- �i'1.
2.
a;? t g ,.., ,.e -50•= .S▪i z8
2.
r FPS_ ..▪-. :4�5' `•?Ci;S . ....v... 3
Zn:'-l' f:iti''M-=7i- 4.1 C _ 4it?S � i.'a:- ." d3f.:_
a-[Y_
.:19�
Shady Oak Ridge
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-235
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF OROINANCE 38-86 ANO OROERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAIO SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 38-86 was adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of September,
1986;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEO BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EOEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 38-86, which is
attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds . that said
text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said
ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
O. That Ordinance No. 38-86 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein,
within 20 days after said publication.
ADOPTEO by the City Council on September 2, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John O. Frane, City Clerk
2 i'Y)
Shady Oak Ridge
•
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1986, by
and between Joseph Ruzic, an individual, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and
the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as
•
"City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential, Zoning
District Change from RM-6.5 to R1.13.5 on 10.06 acres, and preliminary plat of 10.06
acres into 15 lots and three outlots for single family residential development,
situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A,
attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as
"the property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #38-86,
Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of
said property as follows:
1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the
materials revised and dated , 1986, reviewed and approved
by the City Council on July 15, 1986, and attached hereto as Exhibit
B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein.
Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the
property in any other respect or manner than provided herein.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by
Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of
all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Concurrent with construction of streets and utilities, Developer
agrees to construct a gravel trail connecting to the Bryant Lake
4[ Regional Park, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
4. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property,
Developer shall submit to.the City Engineer, and receive the City
► Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water,
storm sewer, and erosion control for the property.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or
cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said
plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance.with Exhibit
C, attached hereto.
5. Developer agrees to notify the. City and the Watershed:District at
least 48 hours in advance of any grading, or tree removal, on the
property.
Prior to issuance of any permit for grading upon the property,
Developer agrees to implement erosion control measures and adequate
protective measures for areas to be preserved and;areas where
grading is not to occur, and to receive City approval of said
measures. Prior : to approval by the City, the Deve'oper must call
for on-site inspection of the property by the City, and defects in
materials. and workmanship in'the-implementation of said measures
shall then be -`determined by the City. Defects in materials or
workmanship shall then be corrected by the Developer, reinspected
and approved by the City prior to issuance of the grading permit by
the City. Approval of materials and workmanship may be subject to
such conditions as the City may impose at the time of acceptance.
6. Developer agrees to confine grading to that area of the property
within the construction limits as shown on: Exhibit::B.. Developer
shall place snow- fencing at the construction limits within the
wooded areas of the property prior to any grading upon the property.
Prior to issuance of any grading permit, Developer shall submit to
the Director of Planning and receive the Director's approval of a
tree inventory of those trees within the construction area and
within 25 ft. outside of the construction area, indicating the size,
type, and location of all trees twelve (12) inches in diameter, or greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground level.
If any such trees are removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the
construction area, Developer agrees that prior to issuance . of any
building permit for the property, Developer shall submit to the
Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of -a
replacement plan for all trees removed, damaged, or destroyed
I
Shady Oak Ridge
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 38-86
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Sunmar : This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located north of
Rowland. Road, west of Old Shady Oak Road, known as Shady Oak Ridge from the RM-6.5
Oistrict to the R1-13.5 and Rural Districts, subject to the terms and conditions of
a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full
legal description of this property.
III Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
/s/John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson
City Clerk Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the — day of , 1986.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
I
av0
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-231
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive
Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and,
WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review
and comment; and,
WHEREAS, the proposal of Adkins Association, Inc., for development of
Prairie Lutheran Church for Church use requires the amendment of the Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: 10.97 acres
located south of Pioneer Trail, north of Blossom Road, and east of Bennett Place.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 2nd day of September, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
I
•
aa()i
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #86-232
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PRAIRIE LUTHERAN CHURCH FOR
ADKINS ASSOCIATION, INC.
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Prairie Lutheran Church for Adkins Association, Inc.,
dated July 21, 1986, consisting of 10.97 acres into one lot for construction of a
church, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance
with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and
amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 2nd day of September, 1986.
(f Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
i.
ATTEST:
'!1
John D. Frane, City Clerk
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
Y�HR UUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: August 29, 1986
RE BLOSSOM ROAD/COUNTY ROAD #1 INTERSECTION
In response to the review of the Prairie Lutheran Church, Hennepin County, in
a letter dated July 22, 1986, recommended that the existing Blossom Road
intersection should either be relocated directly opposite existing Spoon Ridge
or end in a cul-de-sac at CSAH #1. The two alternatives suggested by Hennepin
County were reviewed by the City of Eden Prairie in 1981 and preliminary
drawings were done (see Attachment A). Attachment A depicts the two
alternatives for the Blossom Road/County Road #1 intersection and the effect
I on the adjacent properties. Staff expects that because of the traffic volumes
generated by the Prairie Lutheran Church, Blossom Road/CSAH #1 connection
would be the most feasible.
C
.24ry).03
•
i 1
4
•
q.
•
t I a.. �.'�, %y
h I.OS.tL .' e0 % t p t A 7a:4.OS 1 "to ('. -rl0-
1y f. p�r
r� �I
c o. Ra. i .
.--
.. _-,.t �; 9 t•,(tom ;•v 7; • Cf{i5,• CO !-'.V
SFr1 1 1 j� (T A`. 1
il
_ i�'F. , •.... •sd"ifi.Ai"i7.iiii/t,:: .. 7 \ >
n1 � z� L ♦ • •%.,
n
m \ ®��.�o , ! -mar' 0t., .v 1 , .
`� f S i
., ,,.ai • -n . . .
. . ...
„.
, ,, _
.,..,,,...
•
.„.s.:...,-
,. ,
•• \ .
...
`G� S`� . •
<d..,,•••!•:- 'sue * f
. ....‘,..,•,,,,.
. . . .,. . „ -.„. ,, \
. .
....., x.......
-. •.
/ ',.s• )rs L -0 Fs.• V a
ii,40,,,,-.3,.... . . ., f, •-(# • . \. ,;. ,,,,' (1e, • . .
/�(� ✓,
y� 'l
.� . of
r R .. ti'
ATTACHMENT A • I'
BLOSSOM ROAD/CSAH 1 i,
INTERSECTION ALTERNATIVES
0avLI
STAFF REPORT
I
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
TROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: August 8, 1986
PROJECT: Prairie Lutheran Church
LOCATION: South of County Road #1, north of Blossom Road, and west of Bennett
Place.
APPLICANT: Adkins Association, Inc.
FEE OWNER: Prairie Lutheran Church
REQUEST: 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density
Residential to Church on 10.97 acres.
2. Zoning District Change from R1-22 to Public on 10.97 acres
with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals.
3. Preliminary Plat of 10.97 acres into one lot.
t
Background �F
y
This site is currently designated on t . , ti',
the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide �k.a $6 R
Plan for Low Density Residential. `t - , �,•
This parcel includes Lots 1-3, and W 82-17 "'
24-28, of the Eden Prairie Acres RI 135 OVIii Zt
Addition which is currently zoned Q I
R1-22. Surrounding land use des- �' PROPOSED SITE 77-39�j
ignations in all directions from , l
this site are also Low Density P W Co.,, a RI-13.5
Residential. Specific land uses in �i
�j"J� - �,
this area include County Road #1 to i` �:'• "A 1
the north, Eden Prairie Acres, zoned \, l flisms=••=•. �� ..
R1-22 to the south, Olympic Hills I r �A
3rd and 4th Addition, zoned R1-13.5 «`�1- ._ �
to the northeast, and Creekview °✓/. r , ,� ' � -
Estates and D. Holand Addition to o W j1 - R-42 �_I ;
the west, both zoned R1-13.5. �' 2 1 i ----00 �,�`_
The proponent is requesting a ,J RI-22 6 �'�i
Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from ;,
Low Density Residential to Church
and a Zoning District Change from ,
,. L I it lv 4.
r R1-13 5 r►. 107-84 '.
R I-I3.5'
AREAMLOCATION MAP
Prairie Lutheran Church 2 August 11, 1986
R1-22 to Public to allow for the construction of the Prairie Lutheran Church.
Comprehensive Guide Plan Change
By requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan Change, the proponent was required to
submit documentation explaining why the proposed designation would be better than
what is currently existing on the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Following is a list of
five questions which are part of the Comprehensive Guide Plan substantiation and the
proponent's response and Staff's comments to each.
1. What impact does the requested Guide Plan Change have on the balance of land
uses in the City.
Because the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide Plan does not designate new
sites for churches, any proposed church within the City of Eden Prairie
would have to go through a Comprehensive Guide Plan Change. The property is
currently guided for Low Density Residential and zoned R1-22 which would
allow for a maximum of 22 single family residences to be placed on this site
as it is currently designated. The displacement of 22 single family
residences should not have an effect on the balance of land uses in the
City.
2. What impact does the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change have on surrounding
land uses.
Since the surrounding areas in all directions are guided for Low Density
Residential and have been developed as such, the construction of a church in
this area introduces a different type of land use. However, because a
church is not considered an intensive use with the exception of Sunday
services, it is typically allowed within single family areas. Because of
its location within the triangle of three roadways being Bennett Place,
County Road #1, and Blossom Road, the effect on the adjacent single family
neighborhoods should be minimal.
3. What impact does the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change have on the site.
Based on site topography, the proposed church would require less alteration
to the natural environment than a single family residential neighborhood
would require.
4. What impact does the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change have on City services
such as sewer, water, storm water run-off, and roads.
With the construction of this church and the requirement that all access be
off Bennett Place and Blossom Road, the proponent will be required to submit
a petition for the upgrading of Blossom Road including right-of-way
dedication, street construction, and the extension of water and sanitary
sewer lines to the site. In addition, the intersection of Blossom Road and
County Road #1 will have to be upgraded. Because of the costs associated
with this, the single family residences to the south will be impacted by
this development.
5. Is the requested Comprehensive Guide Plan Change a better use of the land. `.
3
•
Prairie Lutheran Church 3 August 11, 1986
The proponent is stating that to achieve a balance of churches in Eden
Prairie, additional church sites need to be developed in the southeast part
of the City. Based on the steep topography and the location adjacent to
Highway #1, a church in this location, because of its relatively small
utilization of the site, is providing a very large open space between County
Road #1 and the adjacent single family neighborhoods which help to buffer
them from County Road #1. Should single family homes be developed on this
site, additional land alteration and an overall increase in daily traffic is
expected.
Site Plan
The site plan depicts the construction of the Prairie Lutheran Church with a Phase I
building area of approximately 7,200 square feet with seating capacity for 225
people. Based on a Code requirement of one space per three seats in the largest
seating area, a total of 75 parking spaces is required. The future building
expansion would be approximately 10,000 square feet including a seating area for
approximately 400 people.
The site plan shows the building and parking area being located towards the eastern
edge of the site with all access being off Blossom Road. Because Blossom Road is
currently an unimproved road, the proponent shall petition the City to conduct a
feasibility study for the upgrading of Blossom Road. This feasibility report shall
include the upgrading of Blossom Road including a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on
the north side of Blossom Road, the extension of water and sanitary sewer lines to
service the church and the existing signle family residences to the south. Also,
the Hennepin County Department of Transportation is also requiring that alternatives
for the realignment of Blossom Roadway where it intersects County Road #1 be
studied. This could include realigning Blossom Road to be directly across from
Spoonridge Drive or to end in a cul-de-sac.
Grading
Elevations on this site range from a high point of 880 in the southeast corner of
the site adjacent to Blossom Road, to a low point of approximately 816 in the
northwest corner of site adjacent to Bennett Place. The site slopes in a
northwesterly direction towards the intersection of County Road #1 and Bennett Place
and maintains an even slope of about 15%. The proposed site plans attempts to take
into account the natural slope of this area with the design of a two-level building.
Overall grading would be limited to the eastern portion of the site with a minor cut
and fill operation of approximately three feet for each. The proposed grading plan
depicts five-foot high berms within the front yard setback to allow for the
screening of the parking areas.
Landscaping
Based on a 7,200 square foot building, the Landscape Ordinance requires 22.5 caliper
inches of plant material on this site. The proponent is providing a total of 54
caliper inches on this site primarily of the evergreen variety. The landscape plan
also shows a number of trees being 11 caliper inches in size. Because the landscape
plan uses these trees for screening purposes, Staff recommends that the caliper inch
size of this plant material be increased to 21 caliper inches.
.2a3.7
Prairie Lutheran Church 4 August 11, 1986
a With a Phase II building expansion of 10,000 square feet on this site, the proponent
will be required to provide a minimum of 31 additional caliper inches of plant
materials at that time.
Architecture
The building has been designed with two-levels to take advantage of the natural
slopes on this site. The height of the building ranges from approximately 12 feet
from the single story upper level area to approximately 45 feet from the finished
lower elevation to the top of the wall. Because the maximum height allowed in a
public zoning district is 30 feet, the proponent will be required to apply for a
variance from the height requirement. In addition, the primary building materials
proposed for the church include six and twelve-inch wood siding and corduroy block.
Wood trim shall not constitute more than 25% of the total exterior building
material. Because wood is the primary building material, the proponent must request
a variance from the exterior building material standards.
Utilities
An 18-inch sanitary sewer and a 12-inch water main are located in the County Road #1
right-of-way. Since these utility services were never intended to service the site,
the proponent will be required to receive utility service from Blossom Road. The
feasibility study for the upgrading of Blossom Road shall include both the upgrading
of the street and also the extension of water and sanitary sewer service to this
area.
Storm water run-off occurs naturally to the northwest towards Purgatory Creek where
there is an existing storm water detention pond with an 18-inch outlet.
Signage and Lighting
The proponent has not submitted any signage or lighting details at this time. Prior
to review by the City Council, the proponent shall submit any signage and outside
lighting details which are proposed.
Traffic
In reviewing the traffic situation for this area, Staff took into consideration the
location of the churches either existing or proposed and the existing street
network. Included within this analysis are the Pax Christi Church which contains
1,200 seats and 400 parking stalls, the proposed Prairie Lutheran Church including a
first phase building size of 225 seats and 75 parking stalls and a final phase of
400 seats with 135 stalls, and assuming that the property aaiacent to the east would
be developed with the Faith Nazarene Church at approximatel .: the same size as the
Prairie Lutheran Church. In addition, existing traffic .>lumes on County Road #1
were also taken into consideration. Staff did a brief analysis of the amount of
traffic which could be expected utilizing a figure of 85% occupancy of the total
seating for all three churches. Based on these numbers, Staff calculated a number
of total trips which could be expected should church services be concurrent for all
three churches. A range from 460 to 570 trips was calculated based on the Phase I
and Final Phase building areas respectively.
In regards to traffic volumes on County Road 1, current peak hour traffic is
�,-.gib
Prairie Lutheran Church 5 August 11, 1986
approximately 550 trips or 5,500 trips per day. County Road #1 has a minimum
vehicle design capacity of 10,000 trips per day. Based on these figures, total
trips generated by the Pax Christi, Prairie Lutheran, and the Faith Nazarene Church,
approximates that of the weekly peak hour. With the addition of the regular Sunday
traffic on County Road #1 calculated at 70 % of the P.M. peak or 385 trips, a total
of 845 to 955 trips could be expected.
Although this may not cause a problem between the Pax Christi and the Prairie
Lutheran Church, Staff expects that because of the close proximity between the
Prairie Lutheran and the proposed Faith Nazarene Church, traffic congestion may
occur. The proponent has stated that the Prairie Lutheran Church will work in
conjunction with the other churches for scheduling purposes to aid in the reduction
of traffic congestion on County Road #1; however, additional mitigative measures may
be required. (See Attachment A) Because of this, Staff is recommending that the
feasibility report for the upgrading of Blossom Road include a study of the County
Road #1-Blossom Road intersection to determine if any roadway improvements (e.g.,
left and right turn lanes, by-pass lane) are needed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
If the Planning Commission feels that the proponent has substantiated the
Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Public, then Staff
would recommend approval of the request of the Prairie Lutheran Church for a
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Church on 10.97
acres, Zoning District Change from R1-22 to Public on 10.97 acres, and Preliminary
Plat of 10.97 acres into one lot for the construction of Prairie Lutheran Church
0. based on plans dated July 21, 1986, and subject to the Staff Report dated August 8,
1986, and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Submit a petition for the upgrading of Bennett Place of Blossom Road
including street construction, sanitary sewer, and water service.
B. Revise the landscape plan to increase the caliper inches of the 11/2-
inch caliper inch trees to meet the minimum Code requirement of 21
caliper inches and provide the minimum Code requirement for a two-
story building.
C. Submit documentation regarding the scheduling of church services in
conjunction with the Pax Christi Church.
D. Revise the plans to reflect the upgrading of Blossom Road to a 50-
foot right-of-way.
2. Prior to Final Plat approval, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water and erosion control plans for review by
the Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off, detailed erosion control plans
( for review by the City Engineer.
Prairie Lutheran Church 6 August 11, 1986
3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading.
B. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
4. Receive approval from the Board of Appeals for a height and exterior
materials variance.
5. Because the proponent is requesting zoning on the entire site, any
additional building or land alteration shall be reviewed by the Planning
Commission and City Council.
•
•
Prairie Lutheran Church
10631 lee Drive•Eden Prairie.MN 55344•Phone 829-0525 • Pastor Merrill Ronning•Phone 829.0324
July 21, 1986
To Whom It May Concern:
In response to the request for a listing of church
service times for the three churches to be locatea
on County Road 1 , the following is submitted:
Faith Nazarene - Worship 10:00
Sunday School 11:00
Pax Christi - Worship 8:00, 9:30 and 11:00
Prairie Lutheran - Worship 8:30 and 11:00
Sunday School 9:45
After the two new churches are erected next year,
if a problem develops relative to traffic eon-
gestion, both have indicated a willingness to
vary their Sunday morning schedules to alleviate
the problem.
While Prairie Lutheran is currently conducting two
services, it is planned that the new building
will accommodate our members with one service.
The one service would be held at 9:30, 10:00 or
10:30, whichever seems most appropriate at that
time.
Please contact our church office at the number
above, if you wish to receive further information.
Sincerely,
Sandy Calkins
Building Committee
ATTACHMENT A
•
I
Planning Commission Minutes 5 August 11, 1986
B. PRAIRIE LUTHERAN CHURCH, by Adkins Association, Inc. Request for
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to
Church on 10.97 acres, Zoning District Change from R1-22 to Public
on 10.97 acres, with variances to be reviewed by the Board of
Appeals, and Preliminary Plat of 10.97 acres into one lot for
construction of a church. Location: South of Pioneer Trail, north
of Blossom Road, and east of Bennett Place. A public hearing.
Mr. Roger Sjobeck, architect for proponents, reviewed the topography,
architecture, exterior elevations, and floor plans for the proposed
development with the Commission. He discussed the proposed Comprehensive
Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Church noting that the
change would involve the displacement of 22 single family units on this
property.
Mr. Sjobeck stated that this would not be a substantial number of units
displaced given the overall community supply of land guided for Low Density
Residential use. With respect to impact on the site character, Mr. Sjobeck
stated that the development of the property as single family residential
would require substantially more grading than would be required by the
construction of the church, therefore, the impact on the land, itself, would
be less by this proposal. Regarding impact upon City services, Mr. Sjobeck
stated that the requested Comprehensive Guide Plan change would require the
upgrading of Blossom Road in this area; however, this would likely be the
case with development of the property as single family residential, as well.
Regarding whether the church would be a better use of the land, Mr. Sjobeck
stated that it was their opinion that churches and single family residential
neighborhoods made good neighbors for each other, that there was a
complimentary relationship between the two uses. He also noted that the
majority of the churches in the community were located in the northern half
of the City, and that this would balance the locations of churches in Eden
Prairie.
Planner Uram reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report
of August 8, 1986, regarding the development. In addition to standard
requirements regarding grading, utilities, erosion control, streets, and
park dedication, other specific cocerns about the project were raised by the
Staff review. Planner Uram stated that it would be necessary for the
proponent to submit a petition for public improvements for street
construction, sanitary sewer, and water main for Blossom Road. Staff was
also recommending changes to the landscape plan to increase the minimum
caliper inch for trees used for landscaping the site in order that they meet
the minimum City Code requirements of 21 caliper inches at the time of
planting. Staff had expressed concern in the Staff Report regarding the
scheduling of church services in conjunction with the Pax Christi Church,
located on the north side of County Road #1, in terms of traffic congestion
between services. Another required change to the plans in order to meet
City requirements included amendment to all plans to reflect the upgrading
of Blossom Road to a 50 ft. wide right-of-way. Planner Uram noted that it
( would be necessary for the proponents to receive approval of a variance for
the use of wood as an exterior material for the structure and approval of a
variance to exceed the height limitations of the zoning district from the
Board of Appeals prior to construction. Also recommended as a condition of
approval was review of any additional building or land alteration to the
Planning Commission Minutes 6 August 11, 1986
site since the proponents were requesting zoning of the entire parcel, not
just a portion of it.
Planner Uram stated that the City had received a letter from the Hennepin
County Transportation Department regarding the upgrading of the intersection
of Blossom Road and County Road #1. The County was recommending that the
intersection be constructed at a 90 degree angle to County Road #1, or
closed off as a permanent cul-de-sac. The final alignment of the road would
be determined by a feasiblity study.
With respect to traffic impact, Planner Uram stated that Staff had reviewed
the potential traffic in this neighborhood based on three churches--existing
Pax Christi Church, the proposed Prairie Lutheran Church, and Faith Nazarene
Church, which was currently being discussed with proponents at a Staff
level, with a formal application for development pending. It was determined
that County Road #1 would be able to handle the additional development, with
the addition of turn lanes for greater safety and ease of movement for
vehicles.
Regarding the upgrading of Blossom Road, Planner Uram stated that, due to
the recommendation of the Hennepin County Transportation Department, and
because of the feasibility study, Staff was recommending that geometric
changes be made to the intersection which would include the addition of turn
i[ lanes. He noted that the Prairie Lutheran and Pax Christi representatives
had already agreed by letter to work out scheduling differences to provide
for relief from the potential traffic problems on Sunday mornings.
Gartner questioned whether the parking ratio for the church was adequate to
meet the needs of parking for the use. Planner Uram stated that accepted
traffic engineering figures indicated that one parking space for each 2.5
seats in the church was an accepted standard. Eden Prairie required one
space for every three seats. Planner Franzen noted that this parking
formula was used for churches, assembly uses, restaurants, theaters, etc.,
and that the City had not experienced difficulty with this formula.
Gartner asked what would happen to the exception parcel located along
Bennett Place upon development of this parcel. Planner Uram stated this
strip of property was guided for Low Density Residential development and
currently zoned R1-22; however, no building had taken place on the parcel at
this time. He stated development within those parameters was still
possible. Planner Franzen noted that it would also be possible for this
parcel to be developed as R1-13.5 in the future.
Anderson stated that he supported the recommended geometric changes to the
County Road #1 intersection. He added that, while the upgrading of Homeward
Hills Road north to Sunnybrook Road may help alleviate some of the traffic
concerns in this area, the turning lanes would still provide for better
traffic circulation in the neighborhood.
Ms. Sandy Calkins, representative of the building committee for Prairie
Lutheran Church, stated that the church representatives were willing to work
with the other churches in the area to mitigate concerns about traffic
congestion before and after services.
4,
Planning Commission Minutes 7 August 11, 1986
Bye stated that she felt the traffic issues may extend beyond Sunday
morning. For example, each of the churches would likely have choir
practices, various committee meetings, etc., with Wednesdays being the most
popular evening for this currently. She suggested that the three churches
work together regarding traffic resulting from these activities, as well.
Hallett expressed concern about another church in the community which had
added on to its main structure without landscaping, exposing a large, blank
wall to the public view. He asked if the landscaping would be to scale for
this structure, given the request for variance to the maximum height allowed
in the district, in particular along the County Road #1 frontage. Planner
Franzen and Mr. Sjobeck discussed the orientation of the structure on the
site. It was determined that this would be reviewed prior to Council review
and that proponents would provide additional landscaping as may be necessary
to landscape the structure to scale on the north side, towards County Road
#1. Planner Franzen stated that, if necessary, elevations, or a model,
would be requested to assure that the landscaping would be appropriate from
County Road #1.
Hallett asked if the height of the structure would interfere with the
airport zones. Planner Franzen stated that Staff would review this.
Gartner asked why proponents were requesting an all wood exterior. Mr.
Sjobeck responded that it was the opinion of the proponents that a wood
exterior would be more in keeping with the character of the residential
neighborhood.
Ms. Karen Radtke, 11021 Blossom Road, expressed concern about the future
upgrading of Blossom Road and the impact of the improvements on her
property. Planner Franzen explained the assessment process before the City
Council and stated that notices would be sent to all concerned property
owners regarding any proposed improvement. Ms. Radtke asked if this
improvement was being requested because of the proposed development of a
small single family plat south of the proposed church. Planner Franzen
explained that the City considered the church to be a developer, also, and
that development of the small single family plat was incidental to the
requirement for upgrading of the road. Ms. Radtke stated that she was also
concerned about the danger of the intersection at County Road #1 at this
time, and added that she encouraged the improvements proposed by Staff.
Ruebling asked if the improvement of the road would include sanitary sewer
and water main, also. Planner Franzen stated that services were available
to the church property from County Road #1. One of the purposes of the
feasibility study would be to determine the best manner in which to service
the church site for public utilities.
Gartner asked if it was appropriate to locate churches in a residential
neighborhood from a land use point of view. Planner Franzen noted that
churches were not designated in specific locations in the Comprehensive
Guide Plan for purposes of allowing them to prove the case for their
specific use as to appropriate location. Traffic was always a major
consideration. He stated that there was a difference in need and
appropriateness of location based on the size of a church, also, noting the
regional sized church located in the northeast portion of the community.
Planning Commission Minutes 8 August 11, 1986
I
Dodge asked when the improvements to the turn lanes would be constructed.
Planner Uram stated that the timing of the improvements would be determined
by the feasibility study. Dodge asked if the upgrading of the intersection
of County Road #1 and Blossom Road would be a significant improvement to
this area. Planner Franzen stated that the proposed turn lanes and
realignment would improve the current situation, without the construction of
the church.
Ms. Caulkins stated that the position of the church was that they understood
that the upgrading of Blossom Road may be necessary, but that they were not
requesting it to be done as part of their project.
Dodge stated that she felt the upgrading of Blossom Road and the realignment
of its intersection with County Road #1 were necessary in order for
development of this property to take place.
MDTION 1:
Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Gartner, to close the public hearing.
Motion carried--7-0-0
( MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Ruebling, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of the Adkins Association, Inc., for
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Church
for 10.97 acres for Prairie Lutheran Church, based on plans dated dated July
21, 1986, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 8,
1986, with the addition of the following conditions: le) Prior to review by
the City Council, proponent shall provide Staff necessary information
showing that the north side of the structure would be landscaped and
screened to the scale of the building from public view from County Road #1;
and lf) Prior to review by the City Council, the proposed variance for
height of the structure be reviewed against rules and regulations for the
Flying Cloud Airport zones.
Hallett asked when bikeways would be added along County Road #1 by the
County. Planner Franzen stated that the trail was to be constructed within
the right-of-way for County Road #1 and that there was no timing available
from the County at this time regarding the construction of the trail. He
stated that it may be necessary for the City to construct the trail along
County Road #1 and added that this matter would be referred to the Parks,
Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission for their review of this
project.
Motion carried--7-0-0
r MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Ruebling, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of the Adkins Association, Inc., for Zoning
District Change from R1-22 to Public for 10.97 acres for Prairie Lutheran
1 • CITY OF FDFN PRAIRIF
HEN NFPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 86-228
RFSOLUTION APPROVING 1986 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City
Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections in the proposed
assessments for the following improvements to wit:
(See Exhibit A attached)
NOW, THFRFFORE, 8F IT RFSOLVED 8Y THF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FDFN
PRAIRIF:
1. Such proposed assessments are hereby accepted and shall constitute the
special assessment against the lands in the final assessment rolls,
and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be
benefitted by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied
against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of years as shown on Fxhibit A. Installments
shall bear interest at the rates shown on Fxhibit A, commencing
January 1, 1987. No interest shall be charged if the entire
assessment is paid on or before November 15, 1986.
3. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this
assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax
lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid
over in the same manner as other municipal taxes beginning in 1987.
4. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse
itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement
paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on
notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon
any properties abutting on the improvements but not herein assessed
for the improvement when changed conditions relating to such
properties make such assessment feasible.
5. The assessment data of Resolution No. 86-197 is herein revised in
accordance with Fxhibit A attached hereto.
ADOPTFD IN FINAL FORM BY THF Fden Prairie City Council on September 2, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SFAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
RESOLUTION 86-228
EXHIBIT A
1. I.C. 52-035
Sanitary sewer, water main, bridge, Project Cost: $2,973,940.94
storm sewer, and street
improvements on Anderson Lakes City Share: $ 649,869.69
Parkway and Chestnut Drive
Net Assessment: $2,324,071.25
17 Years at 9%
Anderson Lakes Parkway $1,732,613.51 $500/Acre + $116.85 F.F.
Sanitary Sewer $ 101,796.49 ? 3 properties on % of benefit
Water Main $ 238,838.19 $17.086 F.F.
Chestnut Drive $ 270,414.56 100% to 15-116-22 31-03
15-116-22 21 0026 NA - City of Eden Prairie
15-116-22 23 0001 $113,309.86
15-116-22 31 0001 $326,623.22
15-116-22 31 0003 $654,768.22
15-116-22 33 0080 $ 31,341.02
15-116-22 34 0026 $2D4,415.40
15-116-22 42 0001 $ 4,685.00
15-116-22 43 0001 $ 55,593.56
22-116-22 12 0001 $170,178.10
22-116-22 11 0004 $ 48,718.35
22-116-22 11 0005 $ 73,077.53
22-116-22 11 0006 $ 75,292.00
22-116-22 12 0002 $ 24,359.18
22-116-22 13 0002 $118,105.10
22-116-22 13 0003 $ 4,428.94
22-116-22 14 0003 $ 40,598.65
22-116-22 14 0004 $ 20,668.39
22-116-22 14 0005 $332,908.75
22-116-22 21 0031 $ 25,D00.00
2. I.C. 52-060
Sanitary Sewer, Water Main, Slorm Project Cost: $383,550.00
and Street Improvements on
Tanager Lane and on Edenvale Boulevard City Share: $ 22,745.00
from Carlson Drive to Baker Road
Net Assessment: $360,805.00
5 Years at 9%
$360,805.00 _ 36.737 Acre = $9,433.41/Acre r
•
Page 2, Exhibit A, Resolution 86-228
03-116-22 24 0002 $ 4,543.76
03-116-22 24 0003 $ 4,543.76
03-116-22 24 0004 $ 4,543.76
03-116-22 24 0005 $ 4,543.7E
03-116-22 24 0006 $ 4,543.76
03-116-22 24 0007 $ 4,543.76
03-116-22 24 0012 $ 43,657.82
03-116-22 24 0013 $ 85,551.60
03-116-22 24 0014 $190,083.02
SUPPLEMFNTALS
Trunk Sewer and Water
01-116-22 41 0003 $ 2,502.40
02-116-22 14 0006 $ 1.1,532.80
02-116-22 14 0008 $ 14,878.40
05-116-22 21 0047 $ 5,004.80
05-116-22 43 0041 $ 4,352.00
05-116-22 44 0021 $ 20,630.80
07-116-22 41 0001 $ 94,982.40
07-116-22 44 0001 $ 28,342.40
26-116-22 41 0002 $ 4,708.80
17 Years at 9%
Subtrunk Sewer and Water
02-116-22 14 0006 $ 3,507.21
02-116-22 14 0008 $ 4,524.63
17 Years at 11%
Tree Removal
04-116-22 22 0024 $ 600.00
04-116-22 22 0025 $ 400.00
04-116-22 22 0064 $ 420.00
04-116-22 22 0073 $ 450.00
04-116-22 22 0074 $ 350.00
1 Year at 9%
Connection Fee
26-116-22 41 0002 $ 7,400.00
17 Years at 9%
; � f
Planning Commission Minutes 9 August 11, 1986
41
Church, with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, based on
plans dated July 21, 1986, subject to the recommendations of the Staff
Report dated August 8, 1986, with the addition of the following conditions:
le) Prior to review by the City Council, proponent shall provide Staff
necessary information showing that the north side of the structure would be
landscaped and screened to the scale of the building from public view from
County Road #1; and lf) Prior to review by the City Council, the proposed
variance for height of the structure be reviewed against rules and
regulations for the Flying Cloud Airport zones.
Motion carried--7-0-0
MOTION 4:
Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Ruebling, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of the Adkins Association, Inc., for
Preliminary Plat of 10.97 acres into one lot for construction of Prairie
Lutheran Church, baseed on plans dated July 21, 1986, subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 8, 1986, with the addition
of the following conditions: le) Prior to review by the City Council,
proponent shall provide Staff necessary information showing that the north
side of the structure would be landscaped and screened to the scale of the
building from public view from County Road #1; and if) Prior to review by
the City Council, the proposed variance for height of the structure be
reviewed against rules and regulations for the Flying Cloud Airport zones.
Motion carried--7-O-0
V. OLD BUSINESS
None.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
None.
VII. PLANNER'S REPORT
None.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION TO ADJOURN was made by 8ye, seconded by Dodge. Chairman Schuck
adjourned the meeting at 9:05 p.m.
•
.�j
•
Ul.)1M1uU11u113 ul ru11U
10 GENERAL 192673.34
15 -LIQUOR STORE-P V M 78619.51
17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE 52748.57
31 -'PARK ACQUIST 6 DEVELOP 6876.90 ,
33 UTILITY BOND FUND 42331.24
3 77 FIRE DEBT FUND 62731.65
.4 'UTILITY- DEBT FUND 86882.56
45 UTILITY DEBT FD AR8 289040.00
51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 59382.33
57 ROAD IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 2222.67
73 WATER FUND 40454.31
77 SEWER FUND 454.26
81 .TRUST 6 ESCROW FUND 13505.50
$927922.84
•
SEPTEMBER 2,t986
2858.3 VOID OUT CHECK 513.00-
28696 VOID OUT CHECK 12.50-
8722- VOID OUT CHECK 11.00-
978 VOID OUT CHECK 212.50-
9116 VOID OUT CHECK 113.88-
29t71"_VOID OUT CHECK 2349.98-
29189 VOID OUT CHECK 152.78-
29263._VOID OUT CHECK 248.75-
29300`'TOM BUSHARD-PREMIER RENT A CAR CAR RENTAL-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 73.t7
29301 MCDDNALD'S ORANGE DRINK-YOUTH TENNIS FAMILY PICNIC 9.01
29302 MINNESOTA -CLE REGISTRATION-POLICE DEPT 160.00
29303 -:NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 51.18
29304 :"VERMILLION COMMUNITY COLLEGE REGISTRATION-WATER DEPT 175.00
29305 VOID OUT CHECK :0.00
29306`-AARP 55 ALIVE PROGRAM-COMMUNITY CENTER 1t9.00'
• 29307 DOB. GIVERT.SON CONCERT ON AUGUST 6-COMMUNITY CENTER 100.00
29308"-SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC ADS-LIQUOR STORES 253.07
29309 - VICOM SERVICE COMMUNITY CENTER 179.00
29310 AT:&' T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 1057.37
293114'BEER WHOLESALERS INC BEER 7125.50:
• 29312. COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO MIX 786.50
29313.` CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 95.35,. •
29314 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 5580.95
29315` EAST'SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER 12822.80:
29316 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 387.90
29317 MARK VII SALES BEER 18462.28
29318 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO MIX 666.35
29319. ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO BEER 29.56
(320 IROYAL CROWN BEVERAGE CO MIX 256.70
:132t THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 19812.71
29322 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE CO MIX 48.36
29323 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 8-8-B6 23558.9t.
29324 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 8-8-86 9925.52
29325 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS PAYROLL 8-8-86 17876.25
29326 VALLEY FAIR YOUTH PROGRAM TRIP-COMMUNITY CENTER 380.00
29327 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS PAYROLL 8-8-86 564.42 '.
29328 PERA PAYROLL 8-8-86 19134.30
29329 PERA PAYROLL 8-8-B6 63.00
29330 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG PAYROLL 8-8-86 630.00
29331 CITY-COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 8-8-86 239t.t3
29332 NORWEST BANK HOPKINS PAYROLL 8-8-86 600.00
29333 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 8-8-86 10.00 -�
29334 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 8-8-86 5058.00-
29335 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP PAYROLL 8-8-86 760.00
29336 JACK HEESAKER REFUND-UTILITY BILL 2093.36
29337 SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTER INC AUGUST 86 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 4433.53:
29338 CITICORP IN➢USTRIAL CREDIT SEPTEMBER B6 SERVICE 656.81
29339 ANDON INC -BALLOONS/TANK RENTAL-4'a OF JULY I08.00
CELEBRATION
29340 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER CROWBAR/MIRROR/PAINT/RUSTOLEUM-WATER DEPT 137.50
29341 SODERQUIST SERVICES INC -SERVICE-WEE➢ CONTROL-RED ROCK HILLS/ 236.25,.
-AMSDEN HILLS SECOND/ANDERSON LAKES PKWY/
-MEADOW PARK/VALLEY CURVE/HIGH TRAILS
ESTATE/DELLWOOD
342 AMBASSADOR HOTEL MEETING EXPENSES-CANINE REGIONAL TRIALS 582.00
15382627
•
•
�rZU
SEPTEMBER 2,1986
29343 HOPKINS POSTMASTER ZIP CODE BOOK-PLANNING DEPT 9.00
29344 VOID OUT CHECK 0.00
9345 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 12567.46
1346 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 1.492.84
.9347 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA REGISTRATION-ASSESSING DEPT 150.00
29348 _MN ASSOC OF ASSESSING OFFICERS REGISTRATION-ASSESSING DEPT 255.00
29349 SUSAN L DALE REFUND-VALLEY FAIR TRIP 12.50
29350 CAROLE MEIDINGER REFUND-SUMMER EVENING OF ROMANCE 22.00
29351 `JIM MEIDINGER REFUND-SUMMER EVENING OF ROMANCE 22.00
29352.. MENARD'S SUPPLIES-PARK MAINTENANCE 17.61
29353 MARY WILSON SERVICE-4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION 212.50
29354!-ITT-USTS SERVICE -2.86
29355 MN.PUBLIC TRANSIT ASSOC REGISTRATION-ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER 70.00
29356 -MRPA REGISTRATION-COMMUNITY SERVICES 110.00
29357 =.-NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 163.64
29358.--AT°&:T COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 156.24
29359 ' AT-I T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 94.10
29360 JO AUSETH REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 48.00
29361 KEVIN-BADENHOP REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 1I.00
29362 'SHERESE DELIS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 26.00
29363 CAITLIN LARSON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 14.00
29364` JENNIFER MAULER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 1 4,00
29365 JANET NAGLE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 14,00
29366. AMANDA LYNN ORSER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 13.00
29367 MARY RODGERS REFUND-VALLEY FAIR TRIP 9.50
29368 KATHY STELBERG REFUND-VALLEY FAIR TRIP I2.50
29369 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 1ST AID SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 144.15
29370 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE JULY 86 SALES TAR 20018.24
Ar."371 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSIONER YEARLY DEFERMENT PAYMENT 289040.00
372 JEANNE THOMPSON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 11.00'
29373 STEPHANIE ADAIR WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 29.70
29374 `PETER ANDERSON WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 94,00
29375 TONY DOTTDLENE WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 9.00
29376 BRIAN DUPONT WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 47.70 !.'. -
29377 CRAIG FISCHER WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 65.70
29378 CANDY FOLEY WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 123.75
29379 PAIGE GLOCSRUD WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 72.00 .-
29380 JENNI GLOOD WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 90.00
2938I LEANN HEDLUND WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 72,90
29382 PETER HORN WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 9.45 -.._
29383 MINDY JENSEN WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 32.40
29364 PETER JOAS WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 141.50
29385 PAM JOHNSON WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 54.00-
29386 LISA KUSTERBECK WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 58.05 j
29387 ALISON LORENCE WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 102.15
29388 CARRIE MARBLE WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 69.00. ;;_
29389 MORGAN MCINTOSH WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PF. ?AM 138.50 IS'
29390 BRETT MIKA WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PF_.RAM 65.00
29391 SHAWN OLSON WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PRL;;RAM 58.00
29392 EARL REHPDHL WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 5045:
29393 BECKY ROGERS WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 113.S0
29394 LORI RONHOVDE WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 112.00
29395 JENNY SCHINDLER WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM I-13.00
29396 ANDREA SCHLUTER WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 220.00 -
( 197 JAY TREAT WAGES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 103.05
. i
32677836
•
2 ZI . . ::, : --:.-.. -
•
SEPTEMBER 2,1986
29398 EAGLE WINE CO LIQUOR 3666.64
29399 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 2762.17
dr 9400 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 2160.83
`l-9401 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 5167.47
29402 QUALITY WINE CO WINE 4623.12
•
29403 TWIN CITY WINE CO WINE 7820.51
29404 DANA GIBBS PACKET DELIVERIES 65.00
29405 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO WINE 229.09 r.
29406 MARK VII SALES WINE 151.90
• 29407 DANNY'S MARKET EXPENSES-CITY HALL 18.00 •
29408 AAA STRIPING SERVICE INC PAINTING-STREET DEPT 2879.48
29409 A & H WELDING & MFG CO -CASTER WHEEL ATTACHMENT BRACKET- 38.00
WATER DEPT
29410 A LITTLE BRICK SHIRT HOUSE T-SHIRTS FOR TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 76.70
29411 AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS TRUCK REPAIRS-STREET DEPT 557.43
29412 ACCOUNTEMPS INC TEMPORARY HELP-FINANCE DEPT 442.75
29413 ACCUEASE SYSTEMS INC FORMS-COMMUNITY CENTER 253.00
29414 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 637.23
29415 ALDY GRAPHIC SUPPLY INC PAPER-PLANNING DEPT 9.00
2944'6 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS LABORATORY SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 241.04
29417 AMI PRODUCTS INC EQUIPMENT PARTS-STREET DEPT 38.42
29418 EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOC INC SIGNS-PARK MAINTENANCE 255.60
29419. JERRY ANDERSON HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 96.00
29420 MARK J ANDERSON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 798.00
29421 ARTSIGN MATERIALS CO PENS/CHART TAPE/INK-PARK PLANNING 61.68
29422 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC BLACKTOP-STREET DEPT 7842.07
29423 B R W INC -SERVICE-ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY/1H169 TO 19718.40
-MITCHELL ROAD & VALLEY VIEW ROAD TO
COUNTY ROAD 4
9424 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC -BATTERIES/WIPER BLADES/AIR BRAKE/ 277.71
WINDSHIELD WASHER FLUID-STREET DEPT
29425 TODD BEESON T-BALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 56.00 .
29426 BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE-TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THS/CSAH4 1173.50
29427 BILL'S ECONOMY GLASS SERVICE WINDOW REPAIR-CITY HALL 249.00
29428 BLACK & VEATCH SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT 40519.58
29429 BMS/OFFICE STORES INC TYPEWRITER-COMMUNITY CENTER 545.00
29430 MARTY 80LINGSKE REFUND-UTILITY BILL 4.83 -
•29431 RICK BOLINISKI MILEAGE 66.00
29432 BOYER TRUCK PARTS CABLE-FIRE DEPT 13.00
29433 LEE M BRANDT SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 372.00
29434 BRAUN ENG TESTING INC -SERVICE-PRESERVE BLVD & ANDERSON LAKES 987.85
PARKWAY
29435 BRAUN ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES SOIL ANALYSIS-WATER DEPT 1220.40
29436 MIKE BURGETT SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 252.00
29437 CARDOX CORP CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT 1064.14.
29438 CARLSON & CARLSON ASSOC SERVICE-EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 360.00
29439 CASE POWER & EQUIPMENT MACHINERY RENTAL-STREET DEPT 1404.00
29440 CASTLE RIDGE CARE CENTER REFUND-INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BOND 11750.00
29441 CENTRAIRE INC -AIR CONDITIONER & FURNACE MAINTENANCE- 223.70-
CITY HALL
29442 MARK CHALUPSKY SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PO 112,00
29443 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO LEGAL ADS-ENGINEERING OEPT 139.12
29444 CITY OF CHASKA SERVICE-TRANSIT DEMONSTRATION CONTRACT 771.62
• ',445 CITY OF CHASKA GOLF COURSE RENTAL-COMMUNITY CENTER 10.00'
,446 CLEVELAND COTTON PRODUCTS TOWELS-STREET DEPT 222.07
12240:05
i-
SEPTEMBER 2,1986
29447 CLUTCH & U-JOINT BURNSVILLE INC BEARING-STREET DEPT 8.69
29448 ED CORAZALLA DAY CAMP SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 50.39
I^9449 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS INC INSURANCE CONSULTANT 400.00
9450 COUNTRY CLUB MARKET INC SUPPLIES-CITY HALL & FIRE DEPT 219.35
29451 CROWN AUTO INC TRAILER HITCHES-STREET DEPT 82.46
29452 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CO -2 NOTARY STAMPS/SIGNATURE STAMP-FINANCE 60.20
-DEPT/POLICE DEPT/DIRECTOR OF HUMAN
RESOURCES
29453 CULLIGAN WATER SOFTNER-STARING LAKE PARK 5.44
29454 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 8238.48
29455 DALCO CLEANING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 115.34
29456 CRAIG W DAWSON AUGUST 86 EXPENSES 17.25
29457 DICTAPHONE CORPORATION LISTENING DEVICE-POLICE DEPT 32.00
29458 DIXIE PETRO-CHEM INC CHLORINE-WATER DEPT 607.15
29459 WM & JOHN DRESSER REFUND-BUILDING PERMIT 55.50
29460 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 18.55
29461 EAGLE SNACKS INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 28.56
29462 EARL'S ART & DRAFTING SUPPLIES IN SUPPLIES-PLANNING DEPT 16.70
29463 THOMAS E EASTMAN PAGER-COMMUNITY CENTER 4I.00
29464 THOMAS E EASTMAN MILEAGE 7.50
29465 EDINA REALTY REFUND-UTILITY BILL 13.60
29466 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS MANHOLE COVERS-SEWER DEPT 309.68
29467 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC SAFETY SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT & STREET DEPT 163.27
29468 CHRIS ENGER AUGUST 86 EXPENSES 165.00
29469 RON ESS HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 178.00
29470 DON EVE AND SONS BALES-STREET DEPT 42.00
29471 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 456.90
29472 0 & L CONTRACTING INC -SERVICE-ROCKY ROCOCO/FOREST VIEW SCHOOL/ 5877.00
VALLEY VIEW ROAD/GREENRIDGE & VALLEY VIEW
114473 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC RADIO REPAIRS-STREET DEPT 45I.84
29474 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTERS TIRES-STREET DEPT 654.98
29475 GOVERNMENT BUSINESS SYSTEMS SUPPLIES-ELECTIONS 445.63
29476 MARK GRANOWSKI SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 196.00
29477 GROSS OFFICE SUPPLY OFFICE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT & POLICE DEPT 12I.40
29478 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC SERVICE-ROUND LAKE PARK PICNIC SHELTER 3531.00
29479 JIM HALE GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD 144.00
29480 JIM HALE GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PO 8.50
29481 MICHAEL W HAMILTON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 112.00
29482 ROBERT HANSON REFUND-UTILITY BILL 88.64
29483 HANSEN THORP -JULY 86 SERVICE-BLUFFS EAST 4TH ADDITION/ 15401.70
BLUFFS WEST VICINITY STORM SEWER
29484 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS FILING FEES-ENGINEERING DEPT 71.00
29485 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER LABELS-ELECTIONS 84.94
29486 HENNEPIN COUNTY OEPT OF POSTAL VERIFICATIONS-ELECTIONS 56.42
29487 D C HEY COMPANY INC REPAIR COPIER-CITY HALL 65.00
29488 EUGENE A HICKOK & ASSOCIATES JULY 86 SERVICE 1609.10
29489 HI FI SOUND ELECTRONICS OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HAL. 29.00
29490 HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC PUMP SEAL-COMMUNITY CEN''ER 32.23
29491 KURT HYSTER HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 254.00
29492 IBM SEPTEMBER 96 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 1243.02
29493 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC -AUGUST 86 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/TONER 178.40
COLLECTOR CONTAINER-CITY HALL
29494 JORDAN SAWMILL LUMBER-STREET OEPT 100.00
9495 KAYE COPORATION -RING/GASh:ETS/SCREWS/REPA IRS/CYLINER- 88.08
PARK MAINTENANCE
4217689
.
t
SEPTEMBER 2,1986
29496 TOM KEEFE SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 266.00 -
29497 KOKESH ATHLETIC SUPPLIES INC GOLF BALLS/MATS-COMMUNITY CENTER 103.76
29498 MR FRANK KRAEMER REFUND-APPLICATION FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT 970.00 _
9499 ROBERT LAMBERT AUGUST 86 EXPENSES 452.78
9500 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD -JUNE 86 SERVICES-LANDFILL & DORENKEMPER 8070.50
LITIGATION
29501 DOUGLAS LAWYER SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PO 614.00
29502 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE 28905.25
29503 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST INSURANCE-CITY HALL 2070.00
29504 LIFE SUPPORT SERVICES INC -ADULT RESUSAMATE UNITS/CARRYING CASESi 113.47 j.
DISPOSABLE MOUTH PIECES-FIRE DEPT
29505 LUND ASPHALT CONSTRUCTION CO BLACKTOP-STREET DEPT 270.00
29506 LYMAN LUMBER CO LUMBER-STREET DEPT & PARKS DEPT 163.14
29507 'MARSHALL & SWIFT SUBSCRIPTION-ASSESSING DEPT 35.00. ,
2950B MASYS CORPORATION SEPTEMBER B6 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 914,00
29509 TIM MCGOVERN HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 49.00
29510 BILL MCNEIL GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD 60.001
2951I MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT 43.40 `
29512 MERIT/JULIAN GRAPHICS ENVELOPES & FORMS-CITY HALL 692.10
29513 METRO PRINTING INC FORMS-POLICE DEPT & ELECTIONS 367.00
29514 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO -CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-ROUND LAKE I84.50
PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER
29515 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP-STREET DEPT &PARKS DEPT 1909.87
29546 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC ADS-LIQUOR STORES 75.60
29517 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP AUGUST 86 SERVICE 37.75 -
2951B MINNESOTA WANNER CO HOSE STOPPERS-FIRE DEPT -35.00
29519 MOTOROLA INC RADIO REPAIRS-FIRE DEPT 50,00
29520 NORTHERN POWER PRODUCTS INC GENERATOR REPAIRS-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 84.00- ::
79521 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO -STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION CHARGES FOR 830.00
BLUFFS WEST-TANGLEW000 DRIVE
29522 NQRWEST BANK MINNEAPOLIS NA BOND PAYMENTS 149614.21.
29523 DAVE OBRATON T-BALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 42.00
29524 BILL OLSON BLACK DIRT-STREET DEPT 391.00
29525 HARRY ORTLOFF SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 546.00 '
29526 PATRICK PEREZ SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 37B.00
29527 PITNEY BOWES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL .199.00
29528 POMMER MFG CO INC SOFTBALL TROPHIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 1381 .00
29529 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC -FLUORESCENT FIXTURE/GENERATOR REPAIR/ 381.80s j
-REPAIRS-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING &
COMMUNITY CENTER
29530 PRESERVE INSURANCE AGENCY LIQUOR LIABILITY POLICY 16900.00
29531 JAMES PUFAHL SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 224.00.
29532 R & R SPECIALTIES INC BLADE GRIND-COMMUNITY CENTER '66.50 j, -
29533 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA -SERVICE & MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-LIQUOR 1181.51`
STORE
29534 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC -SERVICE-WYNDHAM KNOLL/HIDDEN GLEN 3RD 20346,18`
-ADDITION/RIVER VIEW RE....'TECHNOLOGY
-DRIVE/COMPREHENSIVE SE,'ER POLICY PLAN/
PRESERVE BLVD
29535 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CO RENTAL LEASE/SEAL KIT-PUBLIC WORKS 5284.188`''
29526 ROGERS CABLE SERVICES-COMMUNITY CENTER 10.80
29537 RYANS RUBBER STAMPS RUBBERSTAMPS-LIQUOR STORE &ELECT IONS 36.50 {{
29538 RYDER TRANSPORT INC TRANSPORTATION/SUMMER PROGRAMS 1 -2.50. I:
29539 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO TABLE-BUILDING DEPT 212.00--;;.I
540 WAYNE R SANDERS MEETING EXPENSES-BUILDING DEPT 201.43
24487443
l_1yy
SEPTEMBER 2.1986
29541 EARL 'SCHAEFER SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD I4.00"
29542 SCHELEN AUTO ELECTRIC INC ALTERNATOR INSTALLED-FIRE DEPT 361.38
• 29543 DALE SCHMIDT MEETING EXPENSES-STREET DEPT
(9544 JOAN PAULY 5CHNEIDER 44.26'.
SUPPLIES-TEEN VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 44.26`
9545 .MARK'SEAVALL REFUND-BUILDING PERMIT 50.00
29546 STEVEN R SINELL AUGUST 86 EXPENSES
29547, THE SKETCH PAD 4695
PRECINCT SIGNS-ELECT IONS 269.95.
29548 SMITH' NEPHEW ROLYAN INC SIGNS-PARK MAINTENANCE
29549 SNAP ON TOOLS CORPPULLER 251.37
/PRESS/PLIERS-STREET DEPT 51.31.
29550 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 24.35
29551 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC ADS-ELECTION JUDGES - 48.00
• 29552 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC JULY 86 .LEGAL SERVICES '2444.65 .
29553 STS'CONSULTANTS LTD SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT 1221.26
29554- SULL!VANS SERVICES INC SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER 50.00
29555 SUPPLEE5'7 HI ENTER INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE • 3.58
29556 NATALIE SWAGGERT AUGUST 86 EXPENSES • 165.00''
29557 TARGET 220 SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER • 76.80 '.
29558 TARGET 220• SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 29.43 29559 TENNESSEE CHEMICAL CO CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT .4610.35 29560. THREE M HFY7253 REFLECTIVE PAINT-WATER DEPT
29561 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC 530.40
• 20:GALLONS PAINT-POLICE DEPT 355.55.,
29562 TIRE TOWN INNER TUBES-COMMUNITY CENTER 63.00
29563 TWIN CITY STRIPING STRIPING TRAILS & PARKING LOTS-PARKS DEPT 1.900.00
29564 THE UNITED STATES FIGURE SKATING ICE ARENA`.SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 338.00 29565 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA STUDY OF ROUND LAKE-PARK MAINTENANCE 1125.00- 29566 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC -FLAT WASHERS/LOCK WASHERS/NUTS/SCREWS/ 404.07:
•
BOLTS-STREET DEPT
29567 VIKING AUDIO VISUAL INC MEGAPHONES-COMMUNITY CENTER 378.68
• �9568 VIKING LABORATORIES INC CHEMICALS-COMMUNITY CENTER 587.35 569 VIKING STEEL PRODUCTS INC CULVERT-FRANLO PARK 589.28
9570 DAVID VITTERA SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PO
29571 KEITH •WALL MEETING EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 410.00
29572 WATER PRODUCTS CO -GASKET PIPE/TUBE/2 3" 1000 GAL COMP 2.84
-METERS/480 5/8 X 3/4 100 GAL METERS/240 20232.84 `!
-#2 COPPERHORN/102 PRESSURE REGULATORS/
-VALVES/NUTS/VALVE BOX/12 5/8 X 3/4 100
-GAL REMOTES/EXTENSIONS/MAIN VALVE
EXTENSIONS
29573 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY
TRAINING SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 175.00
29574 WEST WELD WHEELS-STREET DEPT
29575 WESTERN DESIGN & PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS-POLICE DEPT 110.05:•
29576 WI SON TANNER INCENTIVES -YOUTH MEDALLIONS/PARK`ORDINANCE SIGNS- 244.20
COMMUNITY CENTER & PARK MAINTENANCE 244.Z0,
•
3786.184
$92.7922.84
22zu
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: August 28, 1986
SUBJECT:• Petition for Sidewalk on Woodland Drive from Jack McKusky
Attached for your review, is a copy of a petition for a sidewalk along
Woodland Drive from Edenvale Boulevard in the vicinity of the Edenvale Park
north to Edenvale Boulevard, just east of Kara Drive.
Mr. McKusky is a student at Forest Hills School and is very concerned about I
students that have to walk to bus stops, especially in the winter on heavily
travelled streets such as Woodland Drive. Mr. McKusky also thinks it is
important for the residents on either side of Woodland Drive to have a safe
pedestrian access to the Edenvale Neighborhood. Park.
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission reviewed Mr. McKusky's
request and forwarded it to the City Council for consideration.
Mr. McKusky will be in attendance to discuss his proposal with the Council.
The Community Services Staff concur with Mr. McKusky's concerns and recommend
a feasibility study to determine the cost of this project. If the Council
decides to proceed it should be included in the general fund budget for 1987
or 1988.
BL:md
( 1
•
/4/fi ,
1
..N.blf
( • ' (7,WL. ,.)‘/,/( Q-c. ..s.) i'ci,v2-4 v,re.. .5.1... --'\\,k5,..7k. 4111, ..',...
^t"Lw ' \O-Y.NL;�C.,,. ,� c::c� .6ti,...� D. ;v t c,,,,a
' ,-,72// 386 v2err 1- te_ av• .
2. i aalu 1112vn� ,0&33 ra
doJa if
, 4(5144:6. (2/ide_. ..„.. ,k3 G.oracaa... Dr, •
5441.... 9,„,o,,,�� 1Si ,lr 2.1..1yrnirY1,,, , .
7, n(�iI'(��.�.,;�IGZw�-mac.,/s-iy�°��u.��-�fi.�-<-/1�--,
` cl 4u.awt
(11° J 916-tS 6U.Coh;/( /,AL
(
1 ' I
i
r-
/• f •
•• •• • . • •
\ :/ Nam:
(fed
j • ....‘•,..„-,%44//,,..... !
il • .• i ••
• • 1� '� • ems_.
l p
Z • • •
-
U \
\r•t••
t I 1
•l0 • #
/
r 4 ,.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
Monday, August 18, 1986 7:30 p.m., School Board Room
COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Bud Baker, acting chairperson;
Moe Cook, Karon Joyer,
Charles Shaw
COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: Pat Breitenstein, Gary Gonyea,
Brian Mikkelson
COMMISSION STAFF: Bob Lambert, Director of
Community Services
I. ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by acting chairperson, Bud
Baker.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Cook moved to approve the agenda as mailed. Shaw seconded the
mo— t o and it passed 4-0.
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY 21, 1986
Cook noted that there were only five commission members present at the
meeting, but some of the motions showed six members present.
A correction was made adding Bud Baker to the list of those in
attendance at the meeting.
MOTION: Shaw moved to approve the minutes as amended. Joyer seconded
the motion and it passed 3-0. Cook abstained.
IV. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. Petition for Sidewalk on Woodland Dr. from Jack McKuscky
Refer to memo dated August 14, 1986 from Bob Lambert, Director of
Community Services.
Lambert introduced Jack McKuscky who contacted him through his
principal, Mr. Halllett. Jack lives north of Edenvale on Kara
Drive and is concerned with pedestrian access to Edenvale Park.
Jack showed the Commission a map with present sidewalks in red and
proposed sidewalk locations in green.
Lambert said that the two other bus stops are accessible by
sidewalks and Jack is requesting a sidewalk along Woodland Drive
from Edenvale Blvd. near Edenvale Park north to Edenvale Blvd. east
to Kara Drive. Lambert added that if the Commission wishes to make
a recommendation, it would be forwarded to the City Council. He
estimated the cost to construct such a sidewalk would be between
$15,000 and $20,000.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Aug. 18, 1986
_2-
Baker asked if the neighborhood would be assessed for the cost of
the sidewalk. Lambert said no, money would be taken from the
general fund budget.
Cook asked that if a sidewalk were to be constructed, would it be
5' concrete. Lambert said yes.
Shaw asked how old the neighborhood is. Lambert said it was
established in 1975 or 1976 and there would have already been a
sidewalk here if the same standards were used then as they are now.
Baker asked if the sidewalks would be used during the winter.
Lambert said they would be plowed only if they are used, for getting
to a bus stop. The City currently has no equipment for clearing
off sidewalks although they could use the equipment that is used on
hockey rinks. Lambert said the City should meet with the school to
determine areas where children walk to school. These areas are
then priority to clearing snow.
Cook asked if the City puts in sidewalks and doesn't clear them off
in the winter, are they liable if anything happens. Lambert said
the City is not liable unless they do clear off the sidewalks.
IlL. Joyer said since the City does not require residents to clear
sidewalks, is there any chance they would clear them off in this
case. Lambert said the chances of this happening are not very
good.
Joyer asked if this is an established neighborhood or is
construction still going on. Lambert said the neighborhood is
already established.
Lambert commented that this would be a good time for the Commission
to make a recommendation to the City Council on sidewalks since
they are currently reviewing the budget for next year.
MOTION: Cook moved to recommend that the construction of sidewalks
on Woodland Drive be brought to the City Council for their review.
Shaw seconded the motion and it passed 4-0.
B. Letter from David A. Leone, Program Manager NEXRAD Re: Doppler
Radar Site
This is an information item only.
1,7
•
L✓
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Assistant Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: August 25, 1986
SUBJECT: EDENVALE 9TH ADDITION, OUTLOT C GRADING PLAN
This memo was written to provide you with the background and current facts regarding
the proposed grading of Outlot C in the Edenvale 9th Addition.
Approved PUD Grading Plan
In October of 1982, the City Council approved an overall grading plan for the
Edenvale 9th Addition in conjunction with the Planned Unit Development review. This
grading plan demonstrated site preparation for building pad locations and the
alignments for Equitable Drive and Executive Drive. In addition, the plan indicated
minimum disturbances to the knoll in the southeast corner of the property, which
exists at an elevation of 922.
In August 1983, the proponent received a grading permit for Phase I (west half of
the Edenvale 9th Addition). In June 1984, they received a permit for Phase II (east
half of the site).
To date, the west half of the Edenvale 9th Addition has been graded and is currently
under construction with the CMS and Edenvale Executive Center buildings.
The proponent now wishes to amend the Phase II grading permit to comnence with site
preparation and road construction on the east half of the site, including a
regrading of the southeast corner of the property known as Outlot C.
Previous Grading Request of August, 1985
In August of 1985, the proponent requested approval for grading within Outlot C,
specifically in the southeast corner, to clean up the site and make the area more
marketable. This grading plan demonstrated a reshaping of the knoll in the
southeast corner from the original high point of 922 down to an elevation of 896.
The Council denied this request due to fact that the proponent did not provide site
specific building plans to determine the actual extent of grading the site would
have to encompass.
Current Grading Request
The current proposal for grading is similar to last year's, in conjunction with
grading the remainder of the east half of the site, including road construction.
However, this proposal demonstrates a 3:1 berm along the southeast corner with a top
elevation of 904, which is 8' higher than the 1985 request. This plan demonstrates
a maximum cut to the knoll of approximately 26' to the building pad elevations and a
17' cut to the top of the proposed berm.
Memo
Mayor and City Council
Page Two
Along with the grading proposal, the proponent has included site lines which
demonstrate the possible impacts that would occur if a typical 18' building was
constructed. Specifically, the major site lines are from Highway #5 and Plaza Drive
intersections. The site line profiles indicate that a building in the range of 18'
to 20' could adequately be screened from the major roadways with the proposed berm
constructed at an elevation of 904.
The property currently remains in the rural zoning district, and the Guide Plan
depicts this area as an office use. Since this proposal is not based on any site
specific plans, the Council will have to base its decision on the information that
has been provided.
( •
•s-1,/,6"... 1.,' 1
\ Jr
...._
,
/
''..--......" Z
iCP
...._,_, .........."".---
1 ' : iiill 1‘•tellaill
. 56.
•d\,s. .--- I -N) 'i'%al
''-•.'.., '.,..'-, 4: i - ---- / - '.11111 1 kal
\___, ' r:: 2:' \ -2.-7_ ,, ,.' "', ..• - I
) \ /
, '.. / - •"---- :.V ."''...--- .--. ....- ' t - 1:1111 ''tr
-s :111 ‘44
....
„„-------..-1.-,-----.• .- ,,' ir:Ii 4
zt -•_:::. , • ,.„, -
•N --;--__- _ .,!;,..
i•--- 0. -- 1.,,,11.„ ch
- ,
, y .
-, / - - ----.------ - ,—.4-ii-41r-----t---- - Iwo
- - --c---- .- ' Ci
/ ,-_ _ •
- - _-----" ;II
/...
,,
_____•-- ..
ial
- - „- i"----- - , CI
___-_,„---••1"-„-,--„•_---,:•-•_--------
--,-;_=-__ --_-.__..„_••••-_„. •_.:---,- - __.-—,-- _.
,,-
....‹.-..„--- -• ,„--- _- , c!I...„,•__-_______„_, _
2
iii,
41 _ A EDENV ALE 9TH ADD'N C
\ .%.\',I r4,1',,,‘1c,-....•L'r.,..:-,t
............ .. _
ALTERNATIVE'B'' 6 28 85
. -
t
/ .
. _ ._._.(
I `• 5oy-. ANE
l're .•1. 1,,,-;:,.. • .: . . "\T-------- ) , _ .
•
l .
.J
tia
I -, ,I\''• . , t •• / 1 .,
•
;\ \( " \- , \ \\ \, , ,,,,- . , . \ ,
410
' ,• - 1;- • , t \ '''&• \ \ ...„.,,..
u� .'s.,.,.,
0 •
•
y EDEN LAND SALES,INC.
14875 Martin Drive•Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344•(612)937-8300
July 30, 1986
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
RE: Edenvale (9th Addition) Corporate Park
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers,
We hereby request an amendment and modification to the overall site
grading plan of Edenvale 9th Addition. We are specifically requesting
a modification of the easterly one fourth of the property, easterly and
south-easterly of Equitable Drive. (See attachments).
It is our desire to finish grading the portion as shown on the
attachments to smooth out the grades as shown, consistent with the
initial plan so that the site can be balanced to an overall attractive
development, and to minimize the visual impact of the grading that has
4 been completed within the current grading limits. Specifically, we
request the modification at this time, so that the park will have an
attractive appearance and to facilitate the marketing of the attractive
sites, within the area of the proposed modification.
The modifications proposed are consistent with previously approved
developments within the area of Eden Prairie, (see, e.q. specifically
the slope plan of the Norwest Bank, located at the intersection of
Prairie Center Drive and MOOT right-of-way). By maintaining a
substantial, in length and height, berm as proposed, the visual impact
changes from any direction, but specifically Prairie Center Drive and
State Highway 5, will be negligible. In addition, the berms in existence
and to be completed along Valleyview Road will also permit the developer
to have a more "finished product" that will be significantly more
attractive than the present plan. The developer, The Equitable Life
Assurance Society of the United States, will be shortly conunencing
construction of the previously approved buildings along the westerly
portion of Executive Drive. These buildings will further positively
impact the screening of the proposed finished grades in the east-south
east portion of the site.
When the developer sells or develops for its own a:count any of the
site that is the subject of this grading plan modification request, the
staff, planning commission and council will have a further opportunity
to review the ultimate site grades, site lines and grading plans to
ascertain their conformity to city standards. tt is the interest of the
developer at this time to finish only the grading of the entire site to
an attractive and balanced nature. It is not the developers intent to
- 2 - July 30, 1986
create any pad sites or to establish any final grades or elevations
for future building development. This will only be done as a part of
future building development plans to be submitted in the ordinary course
of business, following the ordinances of the City if Eden Prairie.
By permitting the requested modifications, the developer will be
able to commence the landscaping and other general requirements
imposed by the developers agreement, dated June II, 1984.
We will be happy CO respond to any questions concerning this request.
Yours very truly,
Eden Land Sales
(4 /
K. .Schumacher
Attachments
KES/sal
2?,ta,
ffJJ_�/
/3,r:' t.u`.-(tcL.t/e,,_,,, '''r"/
.s>3�y
� L� � , ,:1:,,,
Y+,Lr✓ . QL2-ti- ,-=v/.'/'�{�'
:ftC J[/ : ,
c• 3. ./fit:.:"G
G7J2/,,)c:-:16 1 „,2Z. c?,t c9c-7 ,,;e-t„, - f .GC Iv ...1/"
.f�,,Iw ti
l/ / e- UGC,:c t'›r.)
_T /
/ f (i'-'a..fL.6
J
.eZ•JzJ ..c'iw .C���zG'�.c^�zc� ,�-�'�,�c'� �.�a:cc/
c_.
G L 4 7' ,Gj 'G' ✓ /J
C�n,�..,�o�u
( lJY7.i
//
93 /r,5 r
z�36
I
1
We the undersigned residents of Eden Prairie,and members of the Cardinal it
111 Creek Homeowners Association,respectfully urge the City of Eden Prairie 4
and its Police Department to post and enforce a speed limit of 20 mph
within the confines of ou residential area.
i
NAME ADDRESS 1
^ ,,mo . _µ_t11, k' j
—= - -- 6992 SAND RIDGE RD.
6800 STONEWOOD CT.
_ ,.(LL.J.9.t._._ .127411,J 6804 STONEWOOD CT.
Iddyde--_fie. - 6811 STONEWOOD CT.
j1''
-- --- 6815 STONEWOOD CT.
- •
6820 STONEWOOD CT.
.4_ 7AZa../fr'. 6821 STONEWOOD CT.
II 6825 STONEWOOD CT.
FYdabl. _-_49itt4954 6848 STONEWOOD CT. 1
1
6852 STONEWOOD CT.
6896-- STONEWOOD CT.
-- - drege--- 6836 STONEWOOD CT.
•
-4 . c' 6 i(iG sfo e wa,d o f.
(o�1 O 3 •i-1 o n e,,,,ou ci L
--(J -1-C1/(6``' (o9O'? .54orie„,.-06c) C,L .
41 Val (0 c‘124 S-10 1 et nC4/UU�
1 b� (o E(a g S-toRe.1,00A C.-L.
We the undersigned residents of Eden Prairie, and members of the
Cardinal Creek Homeowners Association,respectfully urge the City of Eden
Prairie and its Police Department to post and enforce a speed limit of 20
mph within the confines of ou residential area
NAME ADDRESS
(1
• i.Li�it. ..... c y 13074 CARDINAL CREEK RD.
T _..r
�2 i�� ��
1 13124 CARDINAL CREEK RD.
/( 13175 CARDINAL CREEK RD.
13176 CARDINAL CREEK RD.
13184 CARDINAL CREEK RD.
6 ::t,4.,..Z/ . (,g;. -4"- -- - 13192 CARDINAL CREEK RD.
IL
v ,. 13196 CARDINAL CREEK RDi .
L- '---- ---1 C S-1- -- 13200 CARDINAL CREEK RD.
f.: _ .i • C 13201 CARDINAL CREEK RD.
131 CARDINAL CREEK RD.
tl
13225 CARDINAL CREEK RD.
,.
l` :, L 2.lip 12249 CARDINAL CREEK RD.
-�`�--- 13273 CARDINAL CREEK RD.
-•/:7;;;d11/' C{Zk.Puwj/";/9" :•'/1A '1;nil.' , +; ,_ kl' .:
4)riL__L ,! l k t.'C,A 13278 CARDINAL CREEK RD.
/ ,/ 13297 CARDINAL CREEK RD.
13336 CARDINAL CREEK RD.
We the undersigned residents of Eden Prairie,and members of the Cardinal
Creek Homeowners Association,respectfully urge the City of Eden Prairie
( and its Police Department to post and enforce a speed limit of 20 mph
within the confines of ou residential area.
NAME k ADDRESS
6835 SAND RIDGE RD.
/� 6836 SAND RIDGE RD.
- _ - 6847 SAND RIDGE RD.
. 7,1aAik Jill41L4' 6848 SAND RIDGE RD.
__ _ s_ZaX 6859 SAND RIDGE RD.
L"Q 6871 SAND RIDGE RD.
— -J?g-- 6883 SAND RIDGE RD.
Gip,iltA,Lett-- 6884 SAND RIDGE RD.
I .dam__43_ ,,2
6895 SAND RIDGE RD.
--/ f' 6907 SAND RIDGE RD.
ill
-- - 2-- -Li-- -- 6908 SAND RIDGE RD.
6919 SAND RIDGE RD.
- -- � 6931 SAND RIDGE RD.
6943 SAND RIDGE RD.
- l. � 6955 SAND RIDGE RD.
� 6956 SAND RIDGE RD.
, �
-16zo,- - 6967 SAND RIDGE RD.
f� }----yam --- 6979 SAND RIDGE RD.
11140 i 6eZ,;:.6.c-sL) 6980 SAND RIDGE RD.
- 6991 SAND RIDGE RD.
We the undersigned residents of Eden Prairie,and members of the Cardinal
II Creek Homeowners Association, respectfully urge the City of Eden Prairie
and its Police Department to post and enforce a speed limit of 20 mph
within the confines of ou residential area
NAME ADDRESS
M] 13511 OAK HILL CT.
G -- 13525 OAK HILL CT.
T- PXgelet "- " - - - --- 13530 OAK HILL CT.
_ ���� _� 13560 OAK HILL CT.
--
"Y 13565 OAK HILL CT.
---, 13590 OAK HILL CT.
- `-- 13517 W00DMERE CIRCLE
- _ /"7R, �f
4 - 13520 WOODMERE CIRCLE
-- _ _ .41.4614)�J,^ 13543 W00DMERE CIRCLE
' -7 2t4. 13546 WOODMERE CIRCLE
-{--- 13569 WOODMERE CIRCLE
—# '_--'l am~^`' 13572 WOODMERE CIRCLE
- / �--- '"" '"" -- 13595 WOODMERE CIRCLE
13598 WOODMERE CIRCLE
_--' air a C32y42-'''''.-fi
6898 EDGEBROOK PL.
14 "140 :#":2P' 6909 EDGEBROOK PL.
- -- 6910 EDGEBROOK PL.
9162ek
�%Q 6921 EDGEBROOK PL.
"--�►�-�- -- ---- ,i,6921 EDGEBROOK PL.
We the undersigned residents of Eden Prairie,and members of the Cardinal f
Creek Homeowners Association,respectfully urge the City of Eden Prairie
I and its Police Department to post and enforce a speed limit of 20 mph
within the confines of ou residential area.
NAME ADDRESS •
L�
6922 EDGEBROOK PL.
1.4e2&-'11'i-es""r` �'+ 6933 EDGEBROOK P
ii../-_,(2-,1 6934 EDGEBROOK PL.
:/-;-:/te, _-__'
6946 EDGEBROOK PL.
` -- `°=9a'1°` 957 EDGEBROOK PL.
CC ii1i- nL kk-('ti"`:t )L 6969 EDGEBROOK PL.
3 _ 6981 EDGEBROOK PL.
'i-1 `1 ...L �� 6982 EDGEBROOK PL.
4 Mett4;.(71(4614) t
6993 EDGEBROOK PL.
__l2_ 1 1___.._ _rt1a+.___�'�� ' ` ��.--1y" _ 6994 EDGEBROOK PL.
✓ >' - - 2_/2---' _zv- 6995 EDGEBROOK PL.
�-4 6997 EDGEBROOK PL.
7000 EDGEBROOK PL.
t, ,� wy`� 6802 SAND RIDGE RD. ,,
�' ---E-`- 6806 SAND RIDGE RD.
us._ c • 1
"1 R 6808 SAND RIDGE RD.
6810 SAND RIDGE RD.
,t2E� .,41'"' 6814 SAND RIDGE RD.
. ' S4
6812 SAND RIDGE RD.
( \*O .kii-V49-/a---"/
6817 SAND RIDGE RD.
CITY OF
: CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE•P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
August 22, 1986
•
Mr. Gene Dietz, City Engineer
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Mr. Dietz:
As you are aware, Chanhassen is in the final design stage with
utility and street improvements for West 184th Street. Our plans
for this street are based on the premise that 184th Street and
Dell Road in Eden Prairie will act as a shared facility along our
joint bounderies with approximately half of the final design
being in either City.
® Such an arrangement raises many questions concerning construction
and long-range maintenance. However, at this point, Chanhassen is
proposing only to build a portion of the ultimate street section
for use as a service road within this business district. All
construction would be done within Chanhassen, except slope work
which would require temporary easements.
The City has worked extensively with RCM on the ultimate street
section and has made sure that the street grades proposed will
not inhibit future improvements to the north. The layout being
submitted for your review allows for both an at-grate or grade
seperated railroad crossing. Additionally, the storm sewer
system has been sized to eliminate the need for a parallel system
along much of the ultimate street section in Eden Prairie.
Since the construction plans for West 184th Street, which are
being forwarded under seperate cover from RCM, are based on a
cooperative project approach, it is important that Eden Prairie
review and concur with the proposal. Chanhassen is not
interested in constructing a modified street system if Eden
Prairie does not agree with the concept and design. For that
reason, I am requesting Eden Prairie review and give formal com-
ment to the construction plans for West 184th Street.
4
•
Mr. Gene Dietz
August 22, 1986
Page 2 •
Should you have any questions concerning the proposal or wish to
review the design in further detail, please let me know.
Sincerely,
William Monk
City Engineer
WM/ks
cc: Dick Potz, RCM
•
•
•
•
•
I
_ r -
zru5
MEMORANDUM
iTO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services '7-dL
DATE: August 27, 1986
SUBJECT: Edenvale Park Trail EAW
At the August 5th meeting, the City Council received a petition to the EQB from
residents adjacent to Edenvale Park for an environmental assessment worksheet and an
environmental impact statement on a Purgatory Creek trail system project.
The petition described the project as one that would place a trail through the entire
length of Purgatory Creek in Eden Prairie from Highway 101 to the Minnesota River.
The petition described the proposed trail within the Edenvale Conservancy Area as a
"portion of this trail which is immediately sought to be approved by the Eden Prairie
City Council is a portion circling the Edenvale Conservancy Area and which provides a
trail on top of the intersceptor line west of Purgatory Creek,". The petition
describes the potential environmental affects that may result from the project as
follows:
1. Disruption of sensitive wildlife habitat in bifurcation of several major
ecological units.
4 2. Disruption of quietude by inserting active uses, including motorized vehicles into
presently quiet and wild area.
3. Disturbance of marshland and destruction of flora, including Liatris.
4. Construction of obstructions to the Purgatory Creek floodway in the form of
bridges.
5. Filling of wet or marshy areas for trail use.
The City staff have reviewed the criteria for a mandatory EAW and for an EIS and agree
with staff from the EQB that the proposed project does not triger a mandatory EAW or
an EIS; furthermore, that the proposed trail within the Edenvale Conservancy Area is
not either a related or phased action of any other trail that may be constructed in
the Purgatory Creek valley.
This trail is not considered a related action to any other trail within the Purgatory
Creek valley for the following reasons:
1. There will not be a trail system following the entire Purgatory Creek valley;
this was determined during the review process of the Purgatory Creek Study in
1976.
2. The trail system within the Edenvale Conservancy Area will not connect directly to
any portion of the trail system north or south of the creek as it is cut off to
IC the north by the railroad tracks and cut off to the south by the Edenvale Golf
Course.
3. The development of any other segement of the City trail system within the
Purgatory Creek valley is not related to the Edenvale Conservancy Area trail
anymore than any other project within the City. For example, the trail proposed
along County Road 1 to be constructed in 1987, will connect to the trail in the
Edenvale Conservancy Area but is not a related action.
4. Any other trail system within the Purgatory Creek valley would not be constructed
within a "limited period of time". Various trail systems that will be developed
within the Purgatory Creek valley will be developed over a 10-25 year period, and
each trail system will serve short segements of the creek valley that basically
relate to the significant features of that section of the creek.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Although an.EAW is not mandatory for this proposed project, the Community Services
Staff recommend:that an EAW be completed on the proposed project. , The majority of the
concerns proposed by the residents relate to the environmental affects of this
proposed project. An EAW may serve to answer some of the questions raised and j
alleviate some of the concerns.
It will take the City staff several weeks to complete th EAW and submit it to the EQB.
Once submitted to the EQB, it will be published and there will be a 30 day waiting
period for any responses to the EAW. Once the waiting period is completed staff will,
report on the findings of the EAW. Staff would estimate this report should be.ready
by the December 2nd meeting. Upon review of the findings of the EAW the City Council
may then wish to determine whether or not the trail is approved.
BL:md
L214/