HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 07/01/1986 AGENDA
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JULY 1, 1986 7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
ROOM 205, WEST WING
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock, and Paul
Redpath
CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to
the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director
John D. Frane, Planning Director Chris
Enger, Director of Community Services
Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works
Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary
Jan Nelson
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND DTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
(. A. Board of Review Meeting held Tuesday, June 3 1986 Page 1491
B. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, June 17, 1986 Page 1498
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Resolution No. 86-161, Authorizing Dispatch and Use of City Page 1516
Equipment and Services py City Manager in Emergency Situations
B. Resolution No. 86-143, Requesting Hennepin County to Administer Page 1518
CDBG Funds Designated for the Greater Minneapolis Day Care
Association Child Care Sliding Fee Program
C. Clerk's License List Page 1520 ,
D. Award Contract for Water Treatment Plant Improvements, Project Page 1521
No. 52-072
E. Receive Feasibility Report for Sanitary Sewer along Baker Road,
Page 1526
north of St. Andrew Drive and set Public Hearing, I_. 5 -
Iffj-s-iilution No. 86-148
F. Final Plat approval for Bluffs West 5th Addition (South of Page 1527
Riverview Road, East of Concord Drive) Resolution No. 8;7150
G. Final Plat approval for Anderson Lakes Center (NW corner of Page 153D
Anderson Lakes Parkway and T.H. 169) Resolution No. 86-151
H. Final Plat approval for Westover Woods (along Cumberland Drive, Page 1533
west of Anderson Lakes Parkway) Resolution No. 86-152.
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,July 1, 1986
I. THE GARDEN, by Hakon and Karen Torjesen. 2nd Reading of Ordinance Page 1536
# 22-85, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5; Approval of
t Developer's Agreement for Luknic 5th Addition (aka The Garden);
and Adoption of Resolution #86-153, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance
#22-85, and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 10.16 acres into
25 single family lots. Location: North of Rowland Road, West of
Shady Oak Road. (Ordinance #22-85, Rezoning; Resolution #86-153,
Authorizing Summary and Publication)
J. WESTOVER WOODS, by Tandem Corporation. 2nd Reading of Ordinance #29- Page 1546
86-PUD-4-86, Zoning District Change from Rural to PUD-4-86, including
the R1-13.5 and R1-9.5 Districts; Approval of Developer's Agreement
for Westover Woods; and Adoption of Resolution #86-155, Authorizing
Summary of Ordinance #29-86-PUD-4-86 and Ordering Publication of
Said Summary. PUD District Review on 15 acres and Rezoning on 11.9
acres with variances and Shoreland Management variances, into 42
single family lots and 2 outlots. Location: South of Anderson Lakes
Parkway and New Cumberland Roads intersection. (Ordinance #29-86-
PUD-4-86, PUD District and Rezoning; Resolution #86-155, Authorizing
Summary and Publication)
K. ANDERSON LAKES CENTER, by Anderson Lakes Center Partnership. 2nd Page 1554
Reading of Ordinance #30-86, Zoning District Change from Rural to C-
Regional-Service; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Anderson
Lakes Center; and Adoption of Resolution #86-156, Authorizing Summary
of Ordinance #30-86 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 4.3
acres with variances and Plat of 15 acres into 3 lots and 2 outlots
for a commercial center. Location: Northwest corner of Highway #169
and Anderson Lakes Parkway.(Ordinance #30-86, Rezoning; Resolution
#86-156, Authorizing Summary and Publication)
L. Joint Powers Agreement Amendment - South Hennepin Human Services Page 1560
Council
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. LAKE PARK, by the Rottlund Company, Inc. Request for Planned Unit Page 1571
Development Concept Amendment on 16.7 acres, Planned Unit
Development District Review within the RM-6.5 zoning district
on 16.7 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 16.7 acres into 102 lots for
construction of 98 townhome units. Location: Southwest quadrant of
County Road #4 and Timber Lakes Drive. (Resolution #86-157, PUD
Concept Amendment; Ordinance #34-86-PUD-5-86, Rezoning; Resolution
#86-158, Preliminary Plat)
B. STENEHJEM ADDITION, by Kathleen M. Stenehjem. Request for Zoning Page 1585
District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 with lot frontage variance,
and Preliminary Plat of 3.34 acres into five single family lots.
Location: North of Craig Drive, east of Duck Lake Road. (Ordinance
#35-86, Rezoning; Resolution #86-159, Preliminary Plat)
C. EIGHTEEN PARK BUSINESS CENTER, by Investment Services Group, Inc. Page 1592
Request for Zoning District Change from I-5 Park to I-2 Park on 2.85
acres with Preliminary Plat of 2.85 acres into one lot for
construction of a 37,000 square foot office/warehouse. Location:
West of Washington Avenue, South of Flying Cloud Drive. (Ordinance
#36-86, Rezoning; Resolution #86-160, Preliminary Plat)
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,July 1, 1986
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Page 1604
VI. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Re uest from Douglas E. Reuter regarding clarification of Page 1612
requirements candidates must fulfill
VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
VIII. APPOINTMENTS
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
B. Re ort of City Manager
1. City Office Space Page 1613
C. Report of City Attorney
X. NEW BUSINESS
XI. ADJOURNMENT.
•
LWAAPPROVED MINUTES
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
BOARD OF REVIEW
TUESDAY, JUNE 3, 1986 6:00 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM
BOARD OF REVIEW MEMBERS: President of the Board Gary D. Peterson,
Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Patricia
Pidcock, and Paul Redpath
BOARD OF REVIEW STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City Assessor
Steve Sinell, and Recording Secretary Karen
Michael
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: All members were present.
I. RECONVENE BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING
The meeting was called to order by President of the Board Peterson.
II. APPROVAL OF BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES OF MEETING HELD THURSDAY, MAY 15, 1986
•
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Minutes of the
Board of Review fleeting held Thursday, May 15, 1986, as published. Motion
carried unanimously.
III. REVIEW OF ITEMS CONTINUED MAY 15, 1986
City Assessor Sinell stated those items referred by the Board at its May
15t) meeting had been reviewed by the Board of Advisors (Regan Massee)
and'or City Staff.
i, RUTH JOHNSON - 4437 Upton Avenue S. - Vacant Land - Non Homestead
•
1986 EMV Ad. Bd. Rec. Assessor's Rec.
30-116-22 22 0015 13,000 16,500 16,500
30-116-22 22 0020 10,000 18,500 1B,500 •
30-116-22 22 0029 10,000 23,000 23,000
30-116-22 22 0030 10,000 22,000 22,000
30-116-22 22 0032 4,000 4,000 4,000
30-116-22 23 0002 15,000 25,000 25,000
30-116-22 23 0003 15,000 22,000 22,000 .
Mrs. Johnson said she did not understand how the values could be
raised. City Assessor Sinell explained the process used. Pidcock
4
/.,•
( Board of Review Minutes -2- June 3, 1986
said she was disconcerted there was no modification of the values.
She said she did not agree with the advisor's recommendation or the
assessor's recommendation. Pidcock said there has been no appre-
ciation in property in the metropolitan area since 1981 so she could
see no reason why these properties should have increased.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to reduce proposed
increases by one third on all properties except 0015 and 0032 to
sustain recommended values: 30-116-22 22 0020 to $15,600; 30-116-22
22 0029 to $18,600; 30-116-22 22 0030 to $18,000; 30-116-22 23 0002 to
$21,600; and 30-116-22 23 0003 to $19,600; 30-116-22 22 0015 - $16,500
and 30-116-22 22 0032 - $4,000.
Bentley said he could not go along with an increase over the original
estimated market values.
VOTE ON MOTION: Motion carried with Bentley voting "no".
2. GEDNEY TUTTLE - 7030 Willow Creek Road
1986 EMV Ad. Bd. Rec. Assessor's Rec.
11-116-22 11 0007 $200,000 no change no change
It was noted that Tuttle intends to further appeal his valuation.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to sustain the 1986
Estimated Property Value on the Tuttle property, PID 11-116-22 11
0007, at $200,000. Motion carried with Pidcock voting "no".
3. VIOLA GAVIN ESTATE - 427, 429 b G5 - Castle Ridge
1986 EMV Ad. Bd. Rec. Assessor's Rec.
14-116-22 32 0295 $104,000 no rec. no change
14-116-22 32 0249 $ 2,400 no rec. no change
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to sustain the 1986
Estimated Property Value on the Viola Gavin property, PIDs 14-I16-22
32 0295 and 14-116-22 32 0249, at $104,000 and $2,400 respectively.
Motion carried with Pidcock voting "no".
4. GARY WAGNER - 7269 Gerard Drive
1986 EMV Ad. Bd. Rec. Assessor's Rec.
11-116-22 23 0044 $128,000 $115,000 $115,000
/` tR
Board of Review Minutes -3- June 3, 1986
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to reduce the 1986 value
on the Wagner property, PID 11-116-22 23 0044, to $115,000. Motion
carried unanimously.
5. GERARD WERSAL - 12645 Sunnybrook Road
1986 EMV Ad. Bd. Rec. Assessor's Rec.
23-116-22 33 0014 $88,000 $83,000 $83,000
Wersal addressed the results of the review.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to reduce the 1986 value
on the Wersal property, PID 23-116-22 33 0014, to $80,000. Motion
carried unanimously.
6. BRUCE BRILL - 6574 Flying Cloud Drive
1986 EIIV Rvw. Appraisal Assessor's Rec.
01-116-22 13 0005 $171,300 $183,000 no change
Brill addressed the appraisal.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to reduce the 1986 value
on the Brill property, PID 01-116-22 13 0005, to $158,500. Motion
carried unanimously.
7. DR. JOHN WRIGHT - 6608 Flying Cloud Drive
1986 EMV Rvw. Appraisal Assessor's Rec.
01-116-22 31 0001 $148,400 $152,000 no change
Dr. Wright gave historical background on the property. He noted his
1985 estimated market value was $127,000.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to reduce the 1986 value
on the Wright property, PID 01-116-22 31 0001, to $137,700. Motion
carried unanimously.
8. S & D PROPERTIES - 7565 Corporate Way
1986 EMV Rvw. Appraisal Assessor's Rec.
09-116-22 42 0006 $472,200 $490,000 44
$ 9,000
/(+i)"J
Board of Review Minutes -4- June 3, 1986
41(
City Assessor Sinell said he had reviewed this property and based on
additional information provided by Ralph Dueschle he would recommend a
reduction in value to $449,000.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to reduce the 1986 value
on the property owned by S & D Properties, PID 09-116-22 42 0006, to
$449,000. Motion carried unanimously.
9. EDENVALE GOLF COURSE
Taxable - 1986 Deferred - 1986
04-116-22 44 0001 $130,800 $349,000
09-116-22 11 0003 $244,600 $540,000
09-116-22 41 0002 $189,200 $505,000
10-116-22 32 0049 $ 98,300 $263,000
George May, attorney for Edenvale, introduced Bob Martin, former
Hennepin County Assessor, who spoke to the increase in assessments
placed upon golf courses in Hennepin County and the process used to
determine those assessments.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to reduce the 1986 value
on the Edenvale Golf Course properties to their 1985 taxable values:
04-116-22 44 0001 to $70,000; 09-116-22 11 0003 to $161,400; 09-116-22
, 41 0002 to $101,000; and 10-116-22 32 0049 to $52,500. Motion carried
unanimously.
THE BOARD OF REVIEII RECESSED UNTIL 9:30 P.M. AT WHICH TIME IT RECONVENED.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to reduce the 1986 values
on the Olympic Hills and Cedar Hills Golf Courses to their 1985
taxable values:
Olympic Hills -
23-116-22 44 0025 from $30,500 to $23,000
23-116-22 44 0026 from $35,500 to $26,500
24-116-22 33 0007 from $57,400 to $20,200
24-116-22 33 0008 from $51,900 to $42,200
24-116-22 34 0045 from $180,100 to $131,700
25-116-22 21 0045 from $92,600 to $69,300
25-116-22 21 0046 from $7,900 to $5,800
25-116-22 22 0016 from $8,200 to $1,000
25-116-22 22 0037 from $860,200 to $785,800
25-116-22 23 0027 from $2,100 to $1,000
r f.
Board of Review Minutes -5- June 3, 1986
Cedar Hills -
29-116-22 13 0001 from $6,400 to $5,400
29-116-22 14 0001 from $88,700 to $62,500
29-116-22 14 0002 from $66,100 to $59,000
(lotion carried unanimously.
10. DARYL V. COOK - 15516 Village Woods Drive - land only
1986 EMV Rvw. Appraisal Assessor's Rec.
16-116-22 34 0031 $26,000 $32,000 no change
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pidcock, to sustain the 1986
estimated market value on the Cook property, PID 16-116-22 34 0031, at
$28,000. Motion carried unanimously.
11. KAREN 0. OLSEN - 9104 Neill Lake Road
I986 EMV Rvw. Appraisal Assessor's Rec.
24-116-22 31 0046 $65,000 $86,400 no change
(MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pidcock, to sustain the 1986
estimated market value on the Olsen property, PID 24-116-22 31 0046,
V� at $35,000. Motion carried unanimously.
12. BRUCE H. LIEBERMAN - GENERAL RESOURCES
1986 EMV Rvw. Appraisal Assessor's Rec.
03-116-22 22 0013 $ 96,900 $121,000 $121,000
03-116-22 22 0014 $292,700 $390,000 $390,000
03-116-22 22 0029 $135,600 $187,000 no change
City Assessor Sinell noted a letter from Lieberman (see attached).
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to sustain the
recommendation of the City Assessor on the General Resources Corp. •
properties: 03-116-22 22 0013 at $121,000; 03-116-22 22 0014 at
$390,000; and 03-116-22 22 0029 at $185,600. (lotion carried
unanimously.
13. LLOYD CHERNE - Green Acres - non homestead
1986 EMV Rvw. Appraisal Assessor's Rec.
15-116-22 44 0001 $400,000 $400,000 no change
14-116-22 33 0009 $ 48,800 $ 48,000 no change
14-116-22 33 0010 $203,000 $203,000 no change
i
Board of Review Minutes -6- June 3, 1986
MOTION: Redpath raved, seconded by Pidcock, to sustain the
recommendation of the City Assessor on the Cherne properties: 15-116-
22 44 0001 at $400,000; 14-116-22 33 0009 at $48,800; and 14-116-22 33
0010 at $203,000. Motion carried unanimously.
14. UPPER MIDWEST MANAGEMENT CORP.
1986 EMV Rvw. Appraisal Assessor's Rec.
14-116-22 42 0002 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 no change
14-116-22 13 0005 $418,200 $374,000 reduce
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pidcock, to affirm the
recommendation of the City Assessor on the Upper Midwest Management
Corp. properties: 14-116-22 42 0002 at $10,000 and 14-116-22 13 0005
at $374,000. Motion carried unanimously.
15. MARVIN F. POER & CO.
1986 EMV Rvw. Appraisal Assessor's Rec.
12-116-22 14 0013 $2,634,600 $2,470,000 $2,470,000
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pidcock, to reduce the value on
the Peer & Co. property, PIO 12-116-22 14 0013, to $2,470,000 as
recommended by the City Assessor. Motion carried unanimously.
16. GILBERT C. WILLIAMS
1986 EMV Rvw. Appraisal Assessor's Rec.
01-116-22 14 0003 $258,000 $230,000 $230,000
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pidcock, to reduce the value on
the Williams property, 01-116-22 14 0003, to $230,000 based on the
M.A.I. appraisal and the recommendation of the City Assessor. Motion
carried unanimously.
17. SAM SCHNEIDER
1986 EMV Rvw. Appraisal Assessor's Rec.
24-116-22 21 0065 $ 99,800 $100,400 no change
24-116-22 21 0068 $127,000 $141,000 no change
24-116-22 21 0069 $133,000 $147,000 no change ,
24-116-22 21 0074 $130,000 $134,000 no change
24-116-22 21 0081 $ 93,000 $ 89,000 reduce
Board of Review Minutes -7- June 3, 1986
t24-116-22 21 0083 $ 93,000 $ 89,000 reduce
24-116-22 21 0087 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 no change
24-116-22 21 0089 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 no change
24-116-22 21 0098 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 no change
24-116-22 21 0102 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 no change
24-116-22 21 0103 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 no change
24-116-22 21 0109 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 no change
24-116-22 21 0110 $1,365,000 $1,365,000 no change
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pidcock, to accept the
recommendation of the City Assessor regarding the valuations on the
Schneider properties: 24-116-22 21 0065 at $99,800; 24-116-22 21 0068
at $127,000; 24-116-22 21 0069 at $133,000; 24-116-22 21 0074 at
$130,000; 24-116-22 21 0081 at $89,000; 24-116-22 21 0083 at $89,000;
24-116-22 21 0087 at $10,000; 24-116-22 21 0089 at $10,000; 24-116-22
21 0098 at $10,000; 24-116-22 21 0102 at $10,000; 24-115-22 21 0103 at
$10,000; 24-116-22 21 0109 at $5,000; and 24-116-22 21 0110 at
$1,365,000. Motion carried unanimously.
18. JOHN TEMAN - 1010 Eden Road
1986 EMV Rvw. Appraisal. Assessor's Rec.
14-116-22 24 0011 $993,900 $993,900 no change
( (deferred) (deferred)
t MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pidcock, to sustain the
recommendation of the City Assessor on the Teman property, PID 14-116-
22 24 0011, at $993,900 (deferred). Motion carried unanimously.
IV. OTHER BUSINESS
The Council commended City Assessor Sinell and his Staff for a job well
done.
V. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 86-1I9, ACCEPTING THE 1986 ASSESSMENT
MORON: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No. 86-
119, accepting the 1986 assessment. Motion carried unanimously.
VI. AOJOURNIIENT
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adjourn the meeting at
9:45 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
i ,
/q q
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, June 17, 1986 7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock, and
Paul Redpath
CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant
to the City Manager Craig Dawson,
City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance
Director John Frane, Planning Director
Chris Enger, Director of Community
Services Robert Lambert, Director of
Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and
Recording Secretary Jan Nelson
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Councilmember Pidcock was absent.
PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE RECOGNIZING JOHN SWORD FOR TEN YEARS OF
SERVICE AS A POLICE RESERVE OFFICER
Mayor Peterson presented a citation plaque and a letter of recogni-
tion to John Sword for his ten years of service as a Police Reserve
Officer. The Mayor explained that the reserve program was initiated
in 1983 to aid and support the regular Police Officers and that
Reserve Officers must work as unpaid volunteers for a minimum of 120
hours per year in a variety of public safety roles.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following items were added to the Agenda: IX. A. 1.
Letter from Doug Reuters X. A. Consideration of Resolution
No. 86-131 - Changes in Precinct Boundaries and Polling Places.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the
Agenda and Other Items of Business as amended and published.
Motion carried unanimously.
II. MINUTES
A. Special City Council Meeting held Friday, May 30, 1986
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to ap
prove
the Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held Friday,
May 30, 1986, as published. Motion carried unanimously.
/j47
City Council Minutes -2- June 17, 1986
B. Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, June 3, 1986
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve
the Minutes of the regular City Council Meeting held
Tuesday, June 3, 1986, as published. Motion carried
unanimously.
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 31-86, Sprinkling Ban Amend-
ment
B. Award Contract for PCB Transformer Replacement at Water
Treatment Plant, I.C. 52-098 (Resolution No. 86-138)
C. Final Plat Approval for Primeland 4th Addition (east side
of City West Parkway) Resolution No. 86-139
D. Final Plat Approval for Hidden Glen North (east & west of
Dell Road, south of Townline) Resolution No. 86-140
E. Special Assessment Agreement for the D. Holland Addition
F. Clerk's License List
G. MOUNT CURVE ADDITION, by Mount Curve Developers. 2nd
Reading of Ordinance #25-85, Zoning District Change from
the Rural District to the RM-6.5 District; Approval of
Developer's Agreement for Mount Curve Addition; and Adop-
tion of Resolution No. 86-130, Approving Summary of Ordi-
nance #25-85 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary.
2.87 acres into nine lots for seven townhouse units.
Location: Southwest corner of Franlo Road and Mount Curve
Road. (Ordinance #25-85, Rezoning; Resolution #86-130,
Approving Summary and Publication)
H. OLYMPIC HILLS 7TH ADDITION, by Olympic Hills Land Corpora-
tion. 2nd Reading of Ordinance #13-86, Zoning District
Change from the Rural District to the R1-13.5 District;
Approval of Developer's Agreement for Olympic Hills 7th
Addition; and Adoption of Resolution #86-131, Approving
Summary of Ordinance #13-86 and Ordering Publication of
Said Summary. 1.05 acres for construction of three single
family homes. Location: 10602, 10632, 10662 Mount Curve
Road. (Ordinance #13-86, Rezoning; Resolution #86-96,
Approving Summary and Publication)
I. TOUCH OF CLASS INTERIORS, by Kate and Craig Halverson.
2nd Reading of Ordinance #14-86, Zoning District Change
from the Rural District to the Office District; Approval
City Council Minutes -3- June 17, 1986
of Developer's Agreement for Touch of Class Interiors;
and Adoption of Resolution #86-132, Approving Summary of
Ordinance #14-86 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary.
Location: Southwest quadrant of County Roads #1 and #18.
(Ordinance #14-86, Rezoning; Resolution #86-132, Approving
Summary and Publication)
J. HIDDEN GLEN NORTH, by Derrick Land Company. 2nd Reading of
Ordinance #21-86-PUD-2-86, Zoning District Change from the
Rural District to the PUD-2-86-Neighborhood-Commercial
District, to the PUD-2-86-RM-6.5 District, to the PUD-2-86-
R1-13.5 District and to the PUD-2-86-R1-9.5 District;
Approval of Developer's Agreement for Hidden Glen North;
and Adoption of Resolution #86-133, Approving Summary of
Ordinance #21-86-PUD-2-86, and Ordering Publication of Said
Summary. Neighborhood Commercial on 2.10 acres, Rural to
Rm-2.5 on 10.95 acres, Rural to R1-9.5 on 22.72 acres, Rural
to R1-13.5 on 8.13 acres, into 119 lots, one outlot, and
road right-of-way. Location: Southeast quadrant of High-
way #101 and Townline Road. (Ordinance #21-86-PUD-2-86,
Rezoning; Resolution #86-133, Approving Summary and Pub-
lication)
K. FLAGSHIP ATHLETIC CLUB, by Flagship Athletic Club. 2nd
Reading of Ordinance #25-86, Zoning District Change from
the Rural District to the Commercial-Regional-Service Dis-
trict; Approval of Amendment to Developer's Agreement of
the Eden Prairie Athletic Club Agreement; and Adoption of
Resolution #86-134, Approving Summary of Ordinance #25-86,
and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 27.4 acres into
2 lots and 2 outlots and road right-of-way for parking lot
expansion. Location: West of Prairie Center Drive at
Singletree Lane. (Ordinance #25-86, Rezoning; Resolution
#86-134, Approving Summary and Publication)
L. BLUFFS WEST 5TH ADDITION, by the Bluffs Comp
any. 2nd Read-
ing of Ordinance #106-84, Rezoning from the R1-22 District
to the R1-13.5 District; Approval of Developer's Agreement
for Bluffs West 5th Addition; and Adoption of Resolution
#86-145, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #106-84 and
Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 14.5 acres for 29
single family lots, south of Riverview Road, along West
Riverview Road. (Ordinance 106-84, Rezoning; Resolution
#86-145, Authorizing Summary and Resolution
M. Approve Plans & Specifications for Wyndham Knoll (South of
W. 62nd Street, East of Hwy. 101), I.C. 52-097, Phase I
(Resolution No. 86-1473)
hL O
City Council Minutes -4- June 17, 1986
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve
Items A - M on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unani-
mously.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CONSIDER DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN BLUFFS WEST 5TH ADDITION
AND VICINITY, I.C. 52-069 (Resolution No. 86-141)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing
had been published and property owners affected had been
notified. He noted that this project had been ordered
following a Public Hearing over a year ago, but the devel-
oper did not continue the development after the project
was approved. He said that a new developer is proposing
to go ahead with development thus requiring the drainage
improvements and, further, that a second Public Hearing
is required because more than a year has elapsed since the
first hearing was held.
Director of Public Works Dietz noted that nothing has changed
in the proposal since the first Public Hearing in February,
1985. He said that the cost will probably be about 5%
higher due to increased costs over the past year and a half.
He referred to the Feasibility Report prepared on the pro-
ject before the first Public Hearing that presented six
alternatives to solve the drainage problems in the area
of Bluffs West 2nd and 5th. He reviewed the alternative
that was recommended to solve the drainage problem and said
that the estimated cost for the project was $274,000 at that
time and would be 5% higher at current prices. He further
noted that $150,000 would be paid for by Hustad Development
and that the assessment rate is 12.3¢ per square foot.
Anderson asked if the interest rates had changed since last
year. Dietz said the rates should be slightly lower but
that he had not changed any of the figures to reflect the
lower rates.
Dr. James Diehl, 10530 W. Riverview Dr., expressed concern
regarding the procedure used to determine what percentage
of each lot drains into the project area. Dietz responded
that, while the assumption was that half of each lot would
drain towards the street, the engineering staff would have
to go out and determine where the drainage line falls after
the project is completed.
Charles Koshenina, 10541 E. Riverview Dr., commented on the
location of the holding pond being near the plume of con-
( from the landfill and asked who would bear the
f
City Council Minutes -5- June 17, 1986
responsibility for repair and maintenance of the pond.
Dietz said that the pond would be used for sedimentation
and that the City would repair and maintain the pond.
Gail Diehl, 10530 W. Riverview Dr., asked what protection
there would be for the wildlife in the area if the pond
becomes contaminated from the landfill. Dietz said that
could be taken into consideration as the final design of
the project is developed. He also noted that he was not
sure of the relationship between the area of the contamina-
tion plume and the location of the pond.
Redpath asked if the drainage project could work without
the pond. Dietz responded that it could but that the pond
would be beneficial to keep sand and gravel deposits out
of the marsh area and to trap heavy metals as well as some
greases and oils.
Koshenina commented that he thought eliminating the pond
was a good idea as it would also help mosquito and insect
control as well as avoid wildlife contamination. Dietz said
that the suggestion will be considered and that the Water-
• shed District and D.N.R. must review the project and they
may require some modifications in the location and design
of the pond that might resolve the issue.
Koshenina asked if the slough hole at the south end of
Concord and Riverview Road would be filled in as part of
the project. Dietz said that, while the City does not own
that property, there will be a piping system put in to
connect the catch basins and pipe drains in the streets
so that water will be diverted from the area.
Brian Keegan, 10510 W. Riverview Dr., expressed his concern
that this project is being ordered and implemented for the
benefit of the developer and that his property will receive
no benefit from it even though he will be assessed for it.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the
Public Hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt
Resolution No. 86-141 ordering improvements and prepara-
tion of plans and specifications for I.C. 52-069, Bluffs
West Vicinity Storm Sewer, and directing staff to investi-
gate with the Watershed District the questions concerning
the need for and location of the holding pond and to check } "
with the landowners regarding their specific concerns about
drainage on their property. Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes -6- June 17, 1986
B. CONSIDER STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON VALLEY VIEW ROAD BETWEEN
CSAH 4 AND MITCHELL ROAD, I.C. 51-272 (Resolution No. 86-
142)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing
had been published and property owners within the project
vicinity had been notified. He noted that,while this im-
provement had been ordered following a Public Hearing
last year, more than one year has elapsed since that deci-
sion and State Statute requires that the project be con-
sidered again at a Public Hearing.
Director of Public Works Dietz reviewed the project details
and noted that just before bids for the project were to
begin this spring, word was received that the Chicago &
Northwestern Railroad had authorized a feasibility Study
to consider abandoning the rail line. He said that, since
the project included a $600,000 bridge structure over the
rail line, the decision was made by the Council at that
time to put the project on hold. He noted that we have
learned that a decision by the railroad may not be forth-
coming soon, as abandonment requires up to two years for
Public Hearings before the I.C.C. and other agencies.
Dietz further stated that, because of the probable length
of time before a decision is reached on abandonment, plans
for this project were revised to include a temporary trestle
over the rail line that will cost about $100,000. He noted
that, other than the change in the bridge structure, the
project is essentially the same as it was last year and
that the proposed assessments have not changed. He then
reviewed the costs of the project and the three categories
of assessments for the project--the existing single family
residences, Edenvale Golf Course and the remaining parcels
adjacent to Valley View Road. He said that costs could be
up to 5% higher than the estimates of last year.
Peterson asked what the projected life of the temporary
trestle would be. Dietz said that it would last longer
than the increased traffic could be tolerated and that, if
it becomes evident that the rail line will not be abandoned,
the bridge would probably have to then be constructed.
Bentley asked if the assessments proposed on the residential
property would be the same as those assessments for any
typical residential street; that is, that this is not an •
assessment for an over-sized road. Dietz responded that
the assessment for the residential property was about half
that of a typical residential street.
2
City Council Minutes -7- June 17, 1986
Anderson asked if Edenvale Boulevard would be closed down.
Dietz said it would not be closed down completely. Ander-
son then asked if a new creek crossing would be built.
Dietz said there would be a new box culvert constructed
south of the existing location.
Anderson asked about the proposed trail and sidewalk
systems. Dietz responded that there would be an eight-
foot wide bike trail on the south side from Hwy #4 to
Edenvale Boulevard and a five-foot concrete sidewalk on
the north from Hwy #4 to Mitchell Road except for the ex-
isting section of bituminous trail on the north side of
the road.
Dwaine Voas, 15807 Valley View Rd., presented a letter to
the Council (Attachment A) expressing his concerns regard-
ing his property and the road reconstruction in general.
He noted his concern regarding compensation for condemna-
tion of his property for the storm sewer and that consider-
ation should be given to expanding Valley View to four-lanes
all the way to Hwy. #4 at this time because of the traffic
levels that will continue to increase. Dietz noted that a
four-lane facility to Hwy #4 would require a substantial
amount of right-of-way taking and that most of what is in
the current project can be done within the existing right-
of-way.
Dave Bowers, 15800 Valley View Rd., expressed concerns about
being assessed for the proposed park trail improvements, and
the large total assessments that would be made for the rela-
tively large lots along Valley View. He was concerned about
the cost for the tunnel being shared with the golf course
and also asked if a study could be made to determine the
cost of putting the utility lines underground.
K. D. Sien, 7400 Ontario, noted his concern about the resi-
dents paying for the commercial developments in the City
and about the proposed speed limit for the new Valley View
Road.
Bentley noted that the commercial developers pay more than
their share of property taxes in the City and said that he
felt this is a fair assessment for all those involved in
the project.
Dietz noted that the road would be designed for 40 mph fi
maximum, but that the road would be signed at 35 mph. He
also noted that the underpass at the golf course was included
as an alternative to a signal light at that point and that
the cost paid by the City for one-half of the tunnel would ,
IGq
Ir City Council Minutes -8- June 17, 1986
be about the same as the cost for the signal light. He
also reviewed the proposed park trail improvements.
Finette Dufour, 7300 Ontario Blvd., noted that the trails
will increase biking and hiking traffic and said that she
believed the road should be posted for 30 mph. Dietz
explained the relationship of the road design to the pro-
posed speed limit.
Anderson noted his concern that we may be penny-wise and
pound-foolish by not expanding Valley View Road to four-
lanes on the western section of the project. Dietz noted
that the traffic volume is on the border line of two-lane
versus four-lane but reiterated that the expansion would
take a lot of right-of-way from the residences along Valley
View and thus would be quite costly.
Tim Dufour, 7300 Ontario Blvd., asked how the assessments
would be made for his development of Prairie Knolls. Dietz
said that the assessment for his residence should have been
included in his escrow account.
Tom Robertson, 7003 Woodland Dr., asked if the plans shown
for the temporary trestle over the rail line were the latest
plans. Dietz said they were.
Bernard Neumann, 15917 Valley View Rd., objected to the
cost of the project as it would be assessed for his wide
lot and noted that other roads feeding into Valley View get
as much benefit as residents along Valley View.
Peterson noted that the assessment to the residents is pri-
marily for curb and gutter improvements and that the cost
of street improvements is being borne by all City residents.
Dietz noted that we have tried to keep a consistent assess-
ment method and that at some point all residents will pay for
half the residential street in front of their homes.
Dietz further noted that there will be another Public Hearing
after the project has been awarded to go through the special
assessment process. Peterson said that anyone who gets an
assessment that he feels is inappropriate can appeal and the-
City must then prove that the assessment is equitable.
Voas asked if there would be traffic signals at the major
intersections. Dietz responded that there were none in the
current project but that signals would be considered as the
need arises in the future.
�V.J,
City Council Minutes -9- June 17, 1986
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to close the •
Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 86-142 authorizing
preparation of plans and specifications for I.C. 51-272,
Valley View Road Improvements between Mitchell Road and
CSAH 4. Motion carried unanimously.
C. IDLEWILD OFFICE CENTER 3RD ADDITION, by Land'Sake, Inc.
Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to Office
on 0.66 acres with Shoreland, and parking setback variances
to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Preliminary Plat-
ting of 2.1 acre into 1 lot and 1 outlot for construction
of a 14,000 square foot building. Location: West of High-
way #169, north of Eden Road. (Ordinance #32-86, Rezoning;
Resolution #86-135, Preliminary Plat)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing
had been published and property owners within the project
vicinity had been notified.
Tom Heiberg, the proponent, addressed the proposal.
Planning Director Enger said that the Planning Commission
reviewed the project at its May 27, 1986 meeting and, on a
IL 5-0 vote, recommended approval of the Zoning District Change
and Preliminary Plat subject to the recommendations contained
in the Staff Report of May 23rd.
Director of Community Services Lambert said that the Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Commission reviewed this item
at its June 2nd meeting and recommended approval per the
Planning Staff recommendations, except that the Parks Com-
mission recommended the sidewalk/stairway extension from
the trail along the lake to the sidewalk along Eden Road be z,
paid for by the City. He further noted that Staff had con-
tacted representatives of Rosemount Engineering to see if
they would allow the trail to be extended on their property
so that it could be completed around the entire lake. He
said Rosemount is considering the request and will get back
to us on it.
Peterson asked who would maintain the stairway and trail
during the winter. Lambert said the City would maintain it
since it is a public trail but that Rosemount was concerned
about leaving the trail open in the winter because of the
open water on the lake.
Bentley asked about the discrepancy in the information
available regarding the size of the lots for the project.
Enger said that the total for the Plat should be 2.7 acres,
City Council Minutes -10- June 17, 1986
and that 0.66 acres is the portion that is not currently
zoned for office. Bentley asked about the size of the
southern parcel and the floor area ratio. Enger said the
parcel is 1.2 acres and the floor area ratio is 25.9%.
Anderson asked about the drainage of Lake Idlewild. Lam-
bert noted that there is an outlet, thus providing an
established normal level for the lake.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the
Public Hearing and adopt 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 32-86
for Rezoning from Rural to Office. Motion carried unani-
mously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt
Resolution No. 86-135 approving the Preliminary Plat dated
June 11, 1986 of Idlewild Office Center 3rd Addition for
Land'Sake, Inc. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to direct Staff
to prepare a Developer's Agreement per staff and Commission
recommendations. Motion carried unanimously.
D. CMS REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS, by Welsh Construction Corp. Re-
quest for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment Review
on approximately 100 acres, Planned Unit Development District
Review on approximately 23 acres with variances, Zoning
District Change from Rural to I-2 Park on 3.24 acres, and
Preliminary Platting of 5.25 acres into 2 lots for construc-
tion of a 33,000 square foot building. Location: West of
Executive Drive, north and east of Equitable Drive. (Reso-
lution #86-136, PUD Concept Amendment; Ordinance #33-86,
Rezoning; Resolution #86-137, Preliminary Plat)
City Manager Jullie stated that notice of this Public Hear-
ing had been published and property owners within the project -
vicinity had been notified.
Paul Dunn and Darrell Anderson, representing proponent,
addressed the proposal.
Planning Director Enger said that the Planning Commission
reviewed this item at its May 27, 1986 meeting and, on a 5-0
vote, recommended approval of the PUD Concept Amendment and
District Review and the Preliminary Plat of 5.25 acres sub-
ject to the recommendations contained in the Staff Report
of May 23rd. He further noted that Staff would be reviewing
a revised landscaping plan prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
d City Council Minutes -11- June 17, 1986
Peterson asked if any consideration had been given by Staff
or Commission as to the effect of the possible future ex-
pansion on the greenspace. Enger said there would be less
greenspace if the building is expanded. Darrell Anderson
pointed out the area of expansion on the project drawings.
Councilmember Anderson asked about the view of the project's
parking area from the nearby apartment buildings. Enger
said there would be a partial view but that there are in-
tervening buildings and an elevation difference.
Redpath asked if there would be semi-trailers parking there
24-hours a day. Dunn said that, with the proposed occupant
who has a ten-year lease, there will be two large truck
deliveries a week and that there will be no over-night
truck parking.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the
Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 86-136 for PUD Con-
cept Amendment to the overall Edenvale Industrial Park 9th
Addition PUD. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt 1st
Reading of Ordinance No. 33-86 for Rezoning from Rural to
I-2 Park, Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Reso-
lution No, 86-137 approving the Preliminary Plat of CMS
Regional Headquarters, Welsh Construction Corp. Motion
carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to direct staff
to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating recommenda-
tions of the Planning Commission and staff. Motion carried
unanimously.
Dunn then asked the Council for permission to construct
footings and foundations prior to the 2nd Reading. Enger
noted that it would probably be about a month before the
2nd Reading is scheduled, but also noted that he would
hesitate to set a precedent by granting such permission.
Councilmember Anderson noted his concern about setting a
precedent by granting this request for early construction
and said that he felt proponent could use other means to
meet the deadlines for construction.
City Council Minutes -12- June 17, 1986
Redpath asked if it would be possible to speed up the
Developer's Agreement. Enger said that under extreme cir-
cumstances a Developer's Agreement has been completed in
two weeks, but noted that he didn't feel these circumstances •
were that extreme nor was it a case of a delay being caused
by the City's planning and approval process.
Bentley noted he felt that the problem is not one of past
performance, but rather it is a case of establishing a
precedent that will return to haunt us.
Peterson asked if the footing and foundation permit could
be issued on the date that the Developer's Agreement is
• signed. Dietz said that normally any building permit is
contingent upon Plat approval because the property is not
considered a buildable lot until the Plat is approved, a •
Developer's Agreement is signed and the fees are paid.
Dietz further said that any change in the usual process is
likely to cause confusion and mistakes will then be made.
The consensus of the Council was to deny the request for
an early footings and foundation permit.
E. REQUEST FOR MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BONDS IN THE •
It AMOUNT OF $1,175,000 FOR THE EXPANSION OF CASTLE RIDGE CARE
CENTER NURSING HOME (Resolution No. 86-144)
City Manager Jullie stated that notice of this Public Hearing
had been published and posted. He said that proponents want
to construct an additional 21 "assisted care" units on the
current nursing home facility, and that the MIDB issue of
May, 1982 to Twin City Christian Homes provided for the •
possibility of a second series of bonds in the future. •
Jean Mulder, representing proponents, was available to
answer questions.
Bentley asked if they had considered expanding into the
existing Castle Ridge Condominium facility rather than con-
structing a new wing. Mulder said that they had looked into
it but the cost was prohibitive and that the units in the
existing facility did not meet the requirements of the pro- .
posed living facilities. She also noted that they needed
to get their own heating and cooling units so that they do y `:
not have to depend on the Condominium facility for heat and I ..
cooling.
Bentley said he thought the primary issue was, as before,
that they are proposing a public sale. He noted that they
City Council Minutes -13- June 17, 1986
now have about a 9% equity position, representing an im-
provement over the first issue when there was no equity
involved.
Redpath asked Finance Director Frane if this proposal
would subtract from our overall MIDB. Frane responded
that it does not as the City no longer has the absolute
right to issue bonds.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve
Resolution No. 86-144 for Preliminary Approval of $1,175,000
in MIDBs. Motion carried unanimously.
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 27701 - 27968
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the
Payment of Claims Nos. 27701 - 27968. Roll call vote: Anderson,
Bentley, Redpath and Peterson voted "aye". Motion carried unani-
mously.
VI. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
There were none.
VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
There were no reports.
VIII. APPOINTMENTS
There were no appointments.
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Letter from Doug Reuter
City Attorney Pauly commented on the letter received
from Doug Reuter dated June 6, 1986, that suggested
cancelling City Code Section 204 which is a code of
ethics for public officials and provides for certain
disclosure of property interests. Pauly said he thought
that section could be repealed at the discretion of the
Council. Bentley noted his interpretation of the letter
to be that Reuter was stating that the section of code
had to be repealed since it unduly restricted the rights
of candidates to raise campaign contributions.
City Council Minutes -14- June 17, 1986
Peterson then asked City Attorney Pauly to review the
letter and to present his opinion on it at the next
Council meeting. He also suggested that Finance Direc-
tor Frane give Pauly any input he has regarding campaign
contributions.
B. Report of City Manager
City Manager Jullie noted the events at the Metropolitan
Council regarding the landfill variances and said that Pauly
would expand on those events in his report.
C. Report of City Attorney
City Attorney Pauly reported on the events during the prev-
ious week during which the Met Council Advisory Committee
considered the adequacy of the final E.I.S. on the Minnea-
polis recovery system that includes the transfer stations.
He said we had asked the Committee to not advise the Met
Council of the adequacy of the E.I.S. because it did not
treat the alternate sites in Eden Prairie as they should
have been treated; however, the Committee voted to recommend
the E.I.S. as being complete and approved as adequate.
Pauly noted that we are asking for a Supplemental E.I.S.
in regard to the transfer stations.
Pauly also reported on the request for variance on the
Flying Cloud landfill. He said that the Advisory Committee
voted that the variance be granted. He said this occurred
despite the fact that the Met Council staff had come out
against the variance and recommended that it not be granted.
He said that we have submitted a letter to the Environmental
Resources Committee and will be making a presentation at
the Committee meeting tomorrow.
D. Report of Director of Public Works
1 . Bids for Water Treatment Plant Expansion, I.C. 52-072
Director of Public Works Dietz sal.a that four bids have
been received for the expansion. He said that the City
Engineers had estimated $5.5 million for the project and
the low bid was $5,050,000. He said that the low bidder,
Shaw-Lundquist, had called after submitting their bid to
say they had made a mistake. He said that because of the
complications caused by this situation, Staff is not
ready to make a recommendation now but will have one
prepared by the July 1st Council meeting.
City Council Minutes -15- June 17, 1986
Anderson asked about the problems with the City water supply
and about the effect of the sprinkling ban. Dietz reported
on the condition of the water supply during the hot weather
and said that the sprinkling ban could now be enforced as a
result of tonight's 2nd Reading.
Anderson commented that the water level in Round Lake was
quite a bit lower and asked if it was necessary to continue
the pumping efforts. Dietz responded that they are trying
to reach a certain level and, barring rainfall tonight,
that level should be reached tomorrow.
X. NEW BUSINESS
A. Consideration of Resolution No. 86-131 - Changes in Precinct
Boundaries and Polling Places
Finance Director Frane reviewed the proposed changes. He
noted that, after this change, there can be no more precinct
boundary changes until 1991.
Bentley asked if the population in the area of Precinct #5-B
would be sufficient to warrant this subdivision. Frane
noted that the lines were drawn based on present population
and estimated growth. A discussion of growth in that area
ensued.
Peterson asked why the precincts are designated IA, 1B, etc.,
rather than 1, 2, etc. Bentley explained the relationship
of precincts to political party elections where delegates
are elected on a precinct basis; therefore, precinct boun-
daries were set so that political parties would have ade-
quate representation from a precinct. Frane said that there
will probably be a major change in 1991 in the designation
of the precincts. Redpath noted that it would have to be
done before the precinct caucuses.
Anderson asked why Precinct #4 does not include the area of
St. Johns Woods as he had received complaints from resi-
dents there regarding confusion as to polling place. Frane
said he thought it would be possible to change it so that
those residents could be included in Precinct #4.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve
Resolution No. 86-131 establishing Precinct Boundaries and
Polling Places with the recommended change in the boundary
of Precinct #4. Motion carried unanimously.
((
is
City Council Minutes -16- June 17, 1986
Planning Director Enger distributed summary position papers
for the M.D.I.F. Public Hearing to be held next Wednesday.
He noted that the southwest communities are preparing a list
of the officials who would like to speak at the Public Hearing.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adjourn the
Meeting at 11:00 PM. Motion carried unanimously.
kN1'1'Ala11.r.tir A)
15807 Valley View Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
June 17, 1986
TO: Eden Prairie City Council
RE: Proposed I.C. 51-272, Reconstruction of Valley View Road
I am writing as a resident of Eden Prairie on Valley View Road for 11
years. In that time I have observed a marked increase in the amount
of traffic on Valley View Road.
Valley View Road is only one of three roadways that crosses, on an
East-West basis, completely across our city. It is obvious that the
street should be of sufficient quality that any Eden Prairie resident
would be proud to claim it. It is not of that quality at this time,
and certainly is in need of being upgraded.
I have concerns cn both a specific level, concerning my property, and
a general level which I urge you and the city staff to consider in
your deliberations and contracting for reconstruction of the road.
My specific levels of concern are:
1. Reference the permanent easement proposed for the installation of
a drain tile and storm sewer. The north third of my property has
IL been a ponding area for snow and rain shower runoff from the
surrounding south and west residential properties. While the
proposed drain tile will eliminate most of the ponding from the
runoff into the storm sewer system, my property will continue to be
the surface carrier for that runoff. Any future development of my
property has to consider the effects of this runoff. Recommend
compensation for the extra effort to maintain the property to permit
the surface runoff and around the storm drain.
2. Reference the trees on the north portion of the property. The
trees were placed to reduce the noise and sight pollution from
traffic on the road. Current drawings indicate that the grading from
the reconstruction could eliminate some of those trees. Recommend
that the contract be stated so that the trees will be protected, with
a guarantee that, in the event they not survive the construction,
that they will be replaced in kind.
3. Reference the proposed addition of Water and Sanitary Sewer
Services. The sewer connection elevation should be sufficiently low
to allow construction on the north half of the property to allow a
normal gravity flow. This can be accomplished by making the
connection to the 8" pipe just north of Valley View Road, instead of
under the road, near the manhole, as is presently planned.
•
/s43
My general areas of concern are:
jr
1 The residents along Valley View Road have to continue to cope
with the increasing traffic levels on the road. This will increase
even more when Highway 5 is being rebuilt. The cost to residents for
rebuilding the road should be minimal.
2. Reconstruction of the road should be for the long term. The
recent proposal received in the mail considering the trail system in
the Purgatory Creek watershid should be considerd along with this
reconstruction for those parts that abut the road.
3. It is just a matter of time in my opinion before this stretch of
the road will be upgraded to four lanes. I question the wisdom of
installing a two-lane road between the rail bed and Eden Prairie Road
when there is or will be a four-lane road east of the rail bed and is
a four-lane road west of Eden Prairie Road.
Sincerely yours,
Dwaine E. Voas
•
•
015
Ifiro'
PP/
April 19, 1985
Government Administrator
•
Dear Sir:
• The City of St. Louis Park, through its Emergency Preparedness Director/
Fire Chief, is a member of the Metropolitan Emergency Managers Association
(MEMA). A standing committee of that organization was charged with the
responsibility of determining the most efficient way of providing assistance
to each other in the event of a disaster.
After about six months of investigating the many different Mutual Aid Pacts
(Police, Fire, and Public Works), they determined that the most efficient •
way to handle most requests for aid would be to leave the present Mutual Aid
Pacts as they are.
In the event of a request for assistance which would involve several different
departments, that request should be directed to the administrative branch
of the Government.
The Committee developed a resolution prototype, to be adopted by each
municipality, that would authorize a City Administrator or his designee
to send equipment and personnel to assist a stricken area, at their request,
in the event of a disaster, with or without a formal Mutual Aid Pact.
The City of St. Louis Park adopted this resolution on April 16, 1985, 1
am recommending it to you for your consideration for your community. If
you should have any questions, please feel free to contact Chief John Kersey
at 920-3000, ext. 56.
Sincerely", I I\
times Brim , City Manager
!". .�.. City of St.. Louis Park
S005 minnetonka boulevard • et.klule park,minneaota 554te • phone 1et2)0203C10 j`.,
(date)
RESOLUTION NO. in I6j
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DISPATCH AND USE OF CITY EQUIPMENT AND
SERVICES BY CITY MANAGER IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that instances have occurred in the
past and can be anticipated in the future wherein there is a danger by fire,
hazard, casualty or other similar occurrences taking place or occurring out—
side the territorial limits of the City of ; and by the
suddenness thereof it would be impossible or impractical for the City Council
to meet and authorize the dispatch and use of City equipment and personnel to
combat such fire, hazard, casualty or other similar occurrence; therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council as follows:
The Council finds it desirable and necessary to authorize the City
Manager or his designee to exercise discretion, considering at all times and
in each case the internal needs of the City of and its in-
habitants, to dispatch City equipment and personnel as deemed necessary to
combat such occurrence whether it takes place within or without the
City limits.
BE iT FURTHER RESOLVED that such dispatch and use as directed by the
City Manager or his designee shall be fully authorized as an act of the City
of and all provisions for compensation of personnel, rental
of equipment, liability insurance coverage, workman's compensation insurance
and all other safeguards and matters pertaining to the City, its equipment
and personnel, shall apply in each case as if specifically authorized and
directed by this City Council at such time, whether or not the governing body
or authority of the place in which the fire, hazard, casualty or other similar
occurrence exists, has previously requested and provided for assistance and
the use of the equipment and personnel under a mutual protection
agreement or other type protection agreement with the City of
FURTHER, the City Manager or his designee shall recall, order and
terminate the use of such equipment and personnel when the need for their
use no longer exists, or earlier, when at his discretion it appears in the
best interest of the City of
Adopted by the City Council j
Attest: Mayor
City Clerk
ILReviewed for administration: Approved as to form and legality:
City Manager City Attorney
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: David Lindahl, Assistant Planner
DATE: June 12, 1986
RE: RESDLUTION NO. 86-143
Urban Hennepin County Communities, participating in the CDBG program, and who have
allocated funds to be used for the Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association (GMDCA),
have the option to assign the administration responsibility of the day care,program
to Hennepin County. This is an effort to streamline the administration of the
program and eliminate the City as a middleman between the GMDCA and Hennepin County.
City Staff has prepared Resolution #86-143 which will legally transfer the
administrative responsibility to Hennepin County.
The County will provide the City a monthly status report indicating, as a minimum,
the clients served residing in and funded with the City' . allocation for the
activity and the balance of unexpended funds.
It. The assignment of administrative responsibility to. ' Hennepin County will
substantially reduce duplication of work and expedite the administrative process for
all agencies involved.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
RESOLUTION NO. 86-143
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING HENNEPIN COUNTY TO ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS DESIGNATED FOR THE
GREATER MINNEAPOLIS DAY CARE ASSOCIATION CHILD CARE SLIDING FEE PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie is an authorized cooperating unit in the
Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant program by virtue of a joint
cooperation agreement executed between the City of Eden Prairie and Hennepin County
pursuant to MSA 471.59; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has allocated Urban Hennepin County
Community Development Block Grant funds in program Year XII Project Number 21028,
for the purpose of supporting the Child Care Sliding Fee program in Eden Prairie,
administered by the Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association (GMDCA);
NDW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in the
document entitled "Public Services Agreement/Daycare", request Hennepiri County to
carry out all administrative responsibilities associated with the GMDCA Child Care
Sliding Fee program.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, on this
day of , 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
l_
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
July 1, 1986
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) PLUMBING
Accurate Services & Construction AAA Co-op Plumbing & Heating
Crown Plumbing
Genz-Ryan Plumbing & Heating
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY) Wenzel Plumbing & Heating
B. L. Anderson Construction
Bunnell Construction, Inc. WELL DRILLING
Dess Solar Company —"
Bud Dropps Construction Leuthner Well Co.
Edgework Builders Mork Well Company, Inc.
Aff Gestach & Paulson Construction
16 Hi-Tec Homes, Inc.
Kele, Inc. HEATING & VENTILATING
barley March
Peterson Pools Genz-Ryan Plumbing & Heating Co.
Richter Construction Wenzel Plumbing & Heating
Tradition Homes
Robert Waade & Associates, Inc. GAS FITTER
Genz-Ryan Plumbing & Heating Co.
ON SALE LIQUOR & SUNDAY LIQUOR
PEDDLAR
Mirage (City West Parkway)
Betty McMahon (Cleaning Products)
Er
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for
the licensed activity.
OCi
Pat Solie, Licensing
BLACK & VEATCH
ENGINEERS-ARCHITECTS TEL.(9131 339-2000
1500 MEADOW LAKE PARKWAY
MAILING ADDRESS P.O.BOX NO.8405
KANSAS CITYMISSOURI 64114
Eden Prairie, Minnesota B&V Project 12106.CPS
Contract No. 1 - Water Treatment B&V File G-1.1
Plant Improvements June 20, 1986
Mr. Gene Dietz
Director of Public Works
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Dear Mr. Dietz:
A successful bid opening was held at the Eden Prairie Fire Station on
June 5, 1986, for the Water Treatment Plant Improvements, Contract No. 1,
City Project No. 52-072A. Five bids were received and are tabulated below:
1. Shaw-Lundquist Associates, Inc. $ 5,014,000
St. Paul, Minnesota
2. Adolfson & Peterson, Inc. $ 5,263,200
Minneapolis, Minnesota
3. M. A. Mortenson Co. $ 5,318,000
Minneapolis, Minnesota
4. Madsen-Johnson Corporation $ 5,357,000
Hudson, Wisconsin
5. Acton Construction Company, Inc. $ 5,420,600
Hugo, Minnesota
We have included a copy of the bid tabulation for your records.
The low bid of $5,014,000, submitted by Shaw-Lundquist, was $249,000 below
the second low bid and $571,000 below the opinion of probable construction
cost of $5,585,000 prepared by Black & Veatch. Although the spread between
first and second low bid was approximately 5 percent, the remainder of the
bids were within a 3 percent range, very representative of a competitive
bidding environment.
Y '
There was some initial concern on the part of Shaw-Lundquist that there was
an error in their bid, and they asked that the City consider allowing them
to withdraw their bid. Shortly thereafter, Shaw-Lundquist subitted a
a .
BLACK @ VEATCH
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 2 B&V Project 12106.CPS
Mr. Gene Dietz June 20, 1986
request that their bid be accepted. We, therefore, have reviewed their bid
documents and have checked out their list of subcontractors and suppliers,
as well as their references.
Shaw-Lundquist has been in the general construction business for over 12
years and their president, Fred Shaw, has been in the business for almost
40 years, having been chief engineer and vice president vith Orville Madsen
& Son, Inc. prior to the forming of Shaw-Lundquist in 1974. Their
experience has been primarily in office buildings, schools, and churches.
They have completed over 46 projects ranging in size from $150,000 to
$8,000,000, including the Eden Prairie High School, and are in the process
of completing nine projects ranging in size from $100,000 to $5,100,000.
We have checked with a number of their references and have found that they
have performed good work, on time, in a coordinated manner, and with
minimal change orders. On the Eden Prairie project, they intend to perform
the concrete, masonry, and carpentry work in addition to general
contracting duties, the areas where they have considerable experience.
Shaw-Lundquist has no experience in the water treatment plant field;
however, the president, Fred Shaw, worked on one wastewater treatment
plant when he was with Madsen. They have proposed for your project a very
11( experienced mechanical subcontractor, Shank Mechanical, Inc., to perform
all equipment installation, piping and mechanical systems, instrumentation,
filters and media, and yard piping. Shank has worked on 25 water and
wastewater treatment plants over the last 12 years as either general
contractor or mechanical subcontractor. Their past contracts ranged in
size from $60,000 to $2,900,000 and their current contracts include a
$400,000 pumping station in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, and contracts at the
water and wastewater treatment plants in Bismarck, North Dakota, totaling
$2,800,000.
We have checked on several references for Shank Mechanical and have found
them to be competent and experienced in the type of work required on the
Eden Prairie project. We feel that the combined experience of Shaw-
Lundquist and Shank should be adequate to perform a high quality job
for the City.
We have reviewed the bidding documents and additional submittals received
since the bid opening and find them to be in order; therefore, we recommend
that Shaw-Lundquist be awarded Contract No. 1.
Regarding the alternative bids requested in the contract documents, we feel
that the proposal for the additional irrigation system over the reservoir
of $3,000 is reasonable and should be accepted by the City. We therefore
recommend that the contract be awarded in the amount of $5,017,00.
The proposal for the alternative radio frequency on the telemetry system of
$76,000 is reasonable, and we recommend that it he accepted contingent on
• BLACK & VEATCH
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 3 B&V Project 12106.CPS
Mr. Gene Dietz June 20, 1986
the results of the propagation survey which will be performed for the
equipment included under the base bid. Should this additional equipment be
necessary, the contract price can be increased by this amount by a future
change order.
Should you have any questions or wish to further discuss this recommen-
dation, please contact us.
Very truly yours,
BLACK & V TCH
J. L. Patton
lr
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Ed Sorenson
lPF�O`. �uNE zyi9dG
r
_L Gi OF PUd(.,C ',1r),;4"`
fi
:n
g o
33 I u O o 0 9
b
Y O O O
H N Y n .
Y • O,r i. n O
G 5.1 p
r1 �
OO A /
p t ti 4
10 V
w0 rt•-0i<
- Y G
p -
y <it S'Vq U r t i
G O
� O.S
C O O O O
O i w
0, O
UO Y YN O O
14
O O
G m •
W Oa o
c A .•
e
N 6 u
W S.0O.S.
ovu0 O O O O
.Y h1 O O m O
C } O O
p o 0
H N N ^
N N N 1 j Y Y O -�
u9S.
W An
S' O
V r3N ,o
1 P
O S'
q P
d O
-O. uAN9 A
.
O T
w 9 0.,V 0.,G 9•-• E
w a , i u a u
- s nm 1r
:4 r k
vofN to
p„ m ... - _ _ __ _._. ._ .._ _ .._ _ .__ _
.i 0
0 o 0.
CO
.`1 u r. 1.
1-
z a
x
0 o m ._ . . ..
o 01 a c a -
A U
1 EE
W 3 N p - c
o a r A
I , E
W - Y c a
Or w ' C A u
elto
n Y u l u A . d
OD O A P .•
b p u^u 0 w .. Y A
.
0 r O u I f 6 V •.
C U N u
1 ', • _
n d • 0'G u i..• i O
- �� ti 7' c 0 s~ 1 .1 1. .i.
5 z O D - u 4ci .J m w
C1 O O O O N
f n' P W 1 J T.:; " . Y
O W
G - L
..4
P
o'' - -_..- -__.- i i
H
t.0 3
Ci _---� --_.- - —_.—
w
Q
H
O
tn
O D O
O P O C C
s e1 po C
W AT T w m m O Cw
13 o b d d ^ F.
H V Y V Y Y}
C
R O
d 7. __ — --_ �.���.
U
W �O CO N C
W U Y
N m
.111 .O 8.3
1CI OV
o P ❑ c
p 1 O P P C
O C
C C g b ❑ 1
in On o
b d b O .1 ❑
. x,:c - Y Y} P.
u0r a
9icmc
vv u m
c w u m�..s
w F. 1 e e❑
J a O V N`a-
" u Y
I- � 6 1t
J S.'
J _
W J J V
J
Y 6
O
ro Y •
S. ir '
J
L
Ja0 - _ ._.._ _ _ .. F _,_ ___ ____ __ __._._ _� .._.__—_.�—��—....�_._.__
= C
p • O
W w u 4.4
1.y
W 3 • V C C V 9 L
u 0 -a
s - N C 0 6 . �n
11n c o w a u" c W 9
o e e - ., Y> >, ti !
o s O b..c 5 x C A
O 4 Cl u ••
"1 O N u G d u T ,.
9 C .Oi H ri1 H I b b -• f
r C . i m a
h L C N fi
H > m N v u w> O O S
4.1
„r rG r •L•4 O u C > Y b u V h.
-i
dT 2su' i % A�u14
o l t f r -- L. b. d-, o w Y , u.Y -, N •
m u 7 b
u
m349 W,ti� e '4g L7r.. R=
•
0
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 86-148
RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT
AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, a report has been given by the City Engineer to the City Council
recommending the following improvements to wit:
I.C. 52-087, Sanitary Sewer along Baker Road north
of St. Andrew Drive
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements in accordance
with the report and the assessment of property abutting or within said
boundaries for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement
pursuant to M.S.A. Section 429.011 to 429.111, at an estimated total
cost of the improvements as shown.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on August
19, 1986, at 7:30 P.M., at the Eden Prairie School Administration
Building, 81D0 School Road. The City Clerk shall give published and
mailed notice of such hearing on the improvements as required by law.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 1, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-150
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
BLUFFS WEST FIFTH ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of Bluffs West Fifth Addition has been submitted in a manner
required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under
Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had
thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for Bluffs West Fifth Addition is
approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City
Engineer's report on this plat dated. June 23, 1986.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A.
waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval.
date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as
described in said engineer's report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the
above named plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on July 1, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
( ATTEST SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
ITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician 7
DATE: June 23, 1986
SUBJECT: BLUFFS WEST FIFTH ADDITION
PROPOSAL:
The Bluffs Company has requested City Council approval of the
final plat of Bluffs West Fifth Addition, a single family
residential plat containing 29 lots on approximately 14.5
acres. The site is located south of Riverview Road and west
of East Riverview Drive in the North 1/2 of Section 35. The
existing roadways, East and West Riverview Drives, are located
within City owned Registered Land Survey tracts. With the
City entering into this plat, the R.L.S. tracts will be
replatted enabling actual right-of-way dedication of the
roadways.
The plat as submitted must be revised to a total of 5 lots in
Block 1 and 24 lots in Block 2. These revisio-s must be
reviewed and approved by the Planning and Engineering
Departments and accomplished on the drawing prior to release
of the final plat.
HISTORY:
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on
February 19, 1985, per Resolution B4-215.
Zoning to RI-13.5 was finally read and approved by the Council
on June 17, 1986, per Ordinance 106-84.
The Developer's Agreement was executed on June 17, 1986.
VARIANCES:
A variance from the requirements of City Code 12.20, Subd.
2.A, waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the
approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final
plat will be necessary.
All other variance requests must be processed through the
Board of Appeals.
I
de
4- Page 2 Final Plat Bluffs West Fifth Addition 6/23/86
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
The Developer has requested City installation of a portion of
the utilities and streets necessary to serve this addition. A
feasibilitiy study for Improvement Contract 52-101 covering
the installation of utilities and streets for East and West
Riverview Drive was ordered by the City Council on June 3,
1986. The Developer has agreed to enter into a special
assessment agreement to cover the cost of these improvements.
This agreement must be executed prior to release of the plat.
The utilities and streets on Covington Circle and storm sewer
across the addition will be installed by the Developer in
conformance with City standards.
PARK DEDICATION:
Park dedication shall conform to City Code requirements.
BONDING:
Bonding, in conformance with City Code requirements, shall
apply to municipal improvements to be installed by the
Developer. Bonding requirements must be satisfied prior to
release of the final plat.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of the final plat of Bluffs West Fifth
Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the
Developer's Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $765.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $4096.
3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $1925.
4. Execution of special assessment agreement.
5. Satisfaction of bonding requirements.
6. Revision of lot arrangements.
DLO:sg
cc: Joseph Miller, Argus Developement
Wallace Hustad, Jr., Hustad Development
4
/5.)L)
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-151
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
ANOERSON LAKES CENTER
WHEREAS, the plat of Anderson Lakes Center has been submitted in a manner
required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under
Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had
thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for Anderson Lakes Center is approved
upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
report on this plat dated June 24, 1986.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision : of the
above named plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on July 1, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
pia
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician (.7 (9
OATE: June 24, 1986
SUBJECT: ANOERSON LAKES CENTER
PROPOSAL:
Anderson Lakes Center Partnership has requested City Council
approval of the final plat of Anderson Lakes Center. A
commercial center is proposed for construction on the site.
The plat contains approximately 15 acres to be divided into 3
lots and 2 outlots. Lots 1, 2 and 3 contain 0.66, 1.07 and
2.65 acres respectively. Ownership of Outlot A (0.68 acres)
will be retained by the Developer and is intended for future
T.H. 169 right-of-way to be purchased by Mn/DOT. Ownership of
Outlot B (9.96 acres) will be retained by the Oeveloper and
will be rezoned and replatted in conformance with City Code
requirements at a later date.
HISTORY:
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on June
3, 1986, per Resolution 85-125.
A second reading by the City Council of Ordinance 30-86,
zoning the property to Neighborhood Commercial, is scheduled
for July 1, 1986.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report is
scheduled for execution on July 1, 1986.
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
Municipal utilities and streets necessary to serve this site
have been installed. Additional requirements are summarized
in the Oeveloper's Agreement.
VARIANCES: 1'
All variance requests must be reviewed by the Board of
Appeals.
PARK DEDICATION:
Park dedication shall conform to the requirements of the
Developer's Agreement and the City Code.
h 3l
Page 2 Final Plat Anderson Lakes Center 6/24/86
BONDING:
Bonding shall conform to the requirements of the Developer's
Agreement and the City Code.
RECOMMENDATIDN:
Recommend approval of the final plat of Anderson Lakes Center
subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's
Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of
$1,229.
2. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $438.
3. Second reading of Ordinance 30-86.
4. Execution of the Developer's Agreement.
DLO:sg
IL
cc: Helen Dowds, Waters, Cluts & O'Brien, Architects
Paul Pearson, McCombs-Knutson
Michael Sjeklocha, Anderson Lakes Center Partnership
C CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-152
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
WESTOVER WOODS
WHEREAS, the plat of Westover Woods has been submitted in a manner required
for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462
of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder,
and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EOEN
PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for Westover Woods is approved upon
compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
report on this plat dated June 26, 1986.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the
above named plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on July 1, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
4[ TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician �1.A•
DATE: June 26, 1986 (/ V
SUBJECT: WESTOVER WOODS
PROPOSAL:
Tandem Corporation has requested City Council approval of the final
plat of Westover Woods, a single family residential subdivision
located south of Anderson Lakes Parkway and west of Purgatory Creek in
the North 1/2 of Section 22. The plat will consist of 39 lots, 4
outlots, and right-of-way dedication for Anderson Lakes Parkway. The
site contains a total of 14.97 acres with Outlots A, B, C, and D being
0.29, 0.36, 0.03, 0.78 acres respectively.
HISTORY:
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council June 3, 1986,
per Resolution 86-124.
A second reading of Ordinance 29-86—PUD-4-86, zoning the property
from Rural to RI-13.5 and RI-9.5 is scheduled for July 1, 1986.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report is scheduled
for execution July 1, 1986.
VARIANCES:
All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
The Developer will be responsible for the payment of costs associated
with the installation of municipal utilities, streets and walkways.
Prior to release of the final plat, the Developer must either submit a
100% petition requesting City installation of the improvements or
commit to private construction in conformance with City standards and
Code requirements.
Outlot A will contain an access drive to Lots 1-6, Block 3. The
outlot and driveway will be privately owned and maintained.
PARK DEDICATION:
All requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's
Agreement.
Outlot B shall be dedicated to the City for park purposes, as required
in the Developer's Agreement. The Developer shall provide a Warranty
Deed for Dutlot B prior to release of the final plat.
( BONDING:
The bonding requirements are covered in the Developer's Agreement.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of the final plat of Westover Woods subject to the
requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the
following:
1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $900.
2. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $1560.
3. Receipt of fee for street lighting in the amount of $4608.
4. Satisfaction,of bonding requirements.
5. Receipt of Warranty Deed for Outlot B prior to release of ri
final plat.
JJ:sg
cc: Tandem Corp.
Westwood Planning & Engineering
Luknic 5th Addition
(AKA The Garden)
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 22-85
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZDNING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the Rural District and be placed in the R1-13.5 District.
Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be,
and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
R1-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in
City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended
accordingly.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of
that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of , entered into
between Luknic Enterprises, a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie,
and those certain Owner's Supplements to Developer's Agreement, between Hakon and
Karen Torjesen, husband and wife, and the City of Eden Prairie and between Crystal
Greguson and the City of Eden Prairie, dated as of , which
Agreement and Owner's Supplements are hereby made a part hereof.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 2nd day of July, 1985, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 1st day of
July, 1986.
ATTEST:
4[ John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
Exhibit A
Page 1 of 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of
Section 2, Township 116, Range 22 described as _follows; Beginning at
a point on the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter with its intersection with the Northeasterly right-of-way line
of Rowland Road; thence on an assumed bearing North 31 degrees 56
minutes 15 seconds East a distance of 221.0 feet to a point in the
East line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, said
point being 185.46 feet North of the Southeast corner of said South-
west Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, thence North 2 degrees 16 minutes
18 seconds West along the East line of said Southwest Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter a distance of 1112.32 feet to the Northeast corner
of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, thence South
88 degrees 35 minutes 02 seconds West along the North line of said
Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 584.10 feet;
thence South 2 degrees 16 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 890.35
feet to the Northeasterly right-of-way line of Rowland Road; thence
South 57 degrees 05 minutes 25 seconds East along the Northwesterly
right-of-way line of Rowland Road a distance of 138.11 feet; thence
•
Southeasterly a distance of 168.58 feet along a tangential curve to
the right; said curve having a radius of 913.88 feet and a central
angle of 10 degrees 34 minutes 10 seconds; thence South 46 degrees
31 minutes 15 seconds East a distance of313.58 feet to the actual
point of beginning, EXCEPT that part of the Southwest Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter of Section ?, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin
IL County described as follows: Commencing at a point on the South
line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter with its
intersection of the Northeasterly right-of-way line of Rowland Road;
thence North 31 degrees 56 minutes 15 seconds East, a distance of
221.00 feet to a point in the East line of the Southwest Quarter of
the Northeast Quarter, said point being 185.46 feet North of the
Southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter,
thence North 02 degrees 16 minutes 18 seconds West, assumed bearing,
along the East line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter, a distance of 449.89 feet to the actual point of beginning;
thence North 02 degrees 16 minutes 18 seconds West, 662.43 feet to
the Northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter; thence South 88 degrees 35 minutes 02 seconds West, along
the North line of sail. Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter,
584.10 feet; thence South 02 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds East,
parallel with the East line of said Southwest Quarter of the North-
east Quarter, a distance of 890.35 feet to the Northeasterly right-
of way line of Rowland Road; thence South 57 degrees 05 minutes
25 seconds East, along said Northeasterly right-of-wav line a
distance of 138.11 feet; thence Southeasterly a distance of 11.89
feet along a curve concave to the Southwest, having a radius of
913.88 feet and central angle of 0 degrees 44 minutes 45 seconds;
thence North 30 degrees 32 minutes 47 seconds East a distance of
507.00 feet; thence South 59 degrees 27 minutes 13 seconds East a
distance of 222.15 feet more or less, to the actual point of beginning.
) l
Exhibit A
Pace 2 of 2
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of
Section 2, Township 116, Range 22 described as follows: Beginning
at a point in the South line of said Southwest Quarter of. the
Northeast Quarter with its intersection of the northeasterly right
of way line of Rowland Road; thence northeasterly to a point in
the East line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter
distant 185.46 feet north from the Southeast corner thereof;
thence south along said East line a distance of 185.46 feet to
said Southeast corner; thence west along the South line of said
Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter to the point of
beginning.
And That part of Government Lot 2, Section 2, Township 116, Range
22 lying northeasterly of the northeasterly right of way line of
Rowland Road.
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of
Section 2, Township 116, Range 22 described as follows: Beginning
at the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter; thence easterly along the South line of said Southeast I`
Quarter of the Northeast Quarter to a point distant 834.05 feet
westerly of the Southeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter; thence northerly, parallel with the East line
of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, 403.0. feet;
thence westerly to a point in the West line of said Southeast
Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 403.5 feet northerly of
the Southwest corner thereof; thence southerly 403.5 feet to said
Southwest corner and the point of beginning.
Luknic 5th Addition
(AKA The Garden)
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1986, by
Luknic Enterprises, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Change from Rural
to R1-13.5 for approximately 10.36 acres, and preliminary plat of approximately
10.36 acres into 23 lots for development as single family homes, situated in
Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached
hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the
property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #22-85,
Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of
said property as follows:
1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the
materials revised and dated , 1986, reviewed and approved
by the City Council on July 2, 1986, and attached hereto as Exhibit
6, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein.
Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the
property in any other respect or manner than provided herein.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by
Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of
all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City
Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water,
storm sewer, and erosion control for the property. Said plans for
streets shall include detailed plans for sight line improvements to
be made for Rowland Road, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
Said plans shall include extension of the sanitary sewer and water
services to the south and west boundary lines of the property, as
depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or
cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said
plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit
C, attached hereto.
4. Developer agrees to notify the City and the Watershed District at
least 48 hours in advance of any grading, or tree removal, on the
property.
5. Prior to issuance of any permit for grading upon the property,
Developer agrees to implement erosion control measures and adequate
protective measures for areas to be preserved and areas where
grading is not to occur, and to receive City approval of said
measures. Prior to approval by the City, the Developer must call
for on-site inspection of the property by the City, and defects in
materials and workmanship in the implementation of said measures
shall then be determined by the City. Defects in materials or
workmanship shall then be corrected by the Developer, reinspected
and approved by the City prior to issuance of the grading permit by
the City. Approval of materials and workmanship may be subject to
such conditions as the City may impose at the time of acceptance.
6. Developer agrees to confine grading to that area of the property
within the construction limits as shown on Exhibit B. Developer
shall place snow fencing at the construction limits within the
wooded areas of the property prior to any grading upon the property.
7. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, Developer shall submit to
the Director of Planning and receive the Director's approval of a
tree inventory of those trees within the construction area and
within 25 ft. outside of the construction area, indicating the size,
type, and location of all trees twelve (12) inches in diameter, or
greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground level.
If any such trees are removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the
construction area, Developer agrees that prior to issuance of any
building permit for the property, Developer shall submit to the
Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of a
•
replacement plan for all trees removed, damaged, or destroyed
outside of the construction area. Developer further agrees that
said trees shall be replaced by similar tree species and that the
trees used for replacement shall be no less than six inches in
diameter. The amount of trees to be replaced shall be determined by
the Director
to thePlanning,
using
square
inch
per
square
areaofthecirclecreatedbyacrosssectionalscut
through the diameter of a
ground. tree as measured 4.5 feet above the
/J�J
If a tree replacement plan is required, Developer agrees that, prior
to issuance of any building permit, Developer shall submit a bond,
or letter of credit, guaranteeing completion of all tree replacement
work as approved by the Director of Planning. The amount of the
bond, or letter of credit, shall be 150% of the approved estimated
cost of implementation of all tree replacement work and shall be in
such form and contain such other provisions and terms as may be
required by the Director of Planning. Developer agrees to prepare
and submit for approval to the Director of Planning a written
estimate of the costs of the tree replacement work to be completed.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall
implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements listed
above in said plans, as approved by the Director of Planning.
8. Developer acknowledges that, at such time as Rowland Road is
upgraded by Hennepin'County, an eight-foot wide asphalt trail will
be constructed from Garden Road northwesterly so as to provide
access to the neighborhood park for residents of the property.
Developer shall not be responsible for construction of said trail.
9. Developer acknowledges that approval of this development by City
activates the deferred special assessments for trunk and sub-trunk
sewer and water for the property.
Luknic 5th Addition
(AKA The Garden)
OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT
TO
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
LUKNIC ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND THE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1986, by
and between Hakon and Karen Torjesen, husband and wife, hereinafter referred to as
"Owners," and the City of Eden Prairie, hereinafter referred to as "City:"
For and in consideration of, and to induce, City to adopt Ordinance #22-85
changing the zoning of the property owned by Owner from Rural to R1-13.5, as more
fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of
, 1986, by and between Luknic Enterprises, Inc., and City,
Owners agree with the City as follows:
1. If Luknic Enterprises, Inc., fails to proceed in accordance with the
Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner
shall not oppose the rezoning of the property to Rural.
2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owners,
their successors, heirs, and assigns of the property.
3. If the Owners transfer such property, owners shall obtain an
agreement from the transferree requiring that such transferee agree ..
to the terms of the Developer's Agreement.
HAKON TORJESEN
KAREN TORJESEN
c
Luknic 5th Addition
(AKA The Garden)
OWNER'S SUPPLEMENT
TO
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
LUKNIC ENTERPRISES, INC.
AND THE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1986, by
and between Crystal Greguson, an individual, hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and ,
the City of Eden Prairie, hereinafter referred to as "City:"
For and in consideration of, and to induce, City to adopt Ordinance #22-85
changing the zoning of the property owned by Owner from Rural to R1-13.5, as more
fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of
, 1986, by and between Luknic Enterprises, Inc., and City,
Owner agrees with the City as follows:
1. If Luknic Enterprises, Inc., fails to proceed in accordance with the
Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner
shall not oppose the rezoning of the property to Rural.
2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner,
their successors, heirs, and assigns of the property.
3. If the Owner transfer such property, owner shall obtain an agreement
from the transferree requiring that such transferee agree to the
terms of the Developer's Agreement.
CRYSTAL GREGUSON
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss.
IL COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
Luknic 5th Addition
(AKA The Garden)
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-153
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE 22-85 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 22-85 was adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 1st day of July,
1986;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 22-85, which is
attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said
text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said
ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 22-85 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein,
within 20 days after said publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on July 1, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Luknic 5th Addition
(AKA The Garden)
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 22-85
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN_LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located north of
Rowland Road, west of Shady Oak Road to be known as Luknic 5th Addition from the
Rural District to the R1-13.5 District, subject to the terms and conditions of a
developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full
legal description of this property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
/s/John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson
City Clerk Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the _ day of , 1986.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
2:.
Westover Woods
4 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 29-86-PUD-4-86
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 4-86
District (hereinafter "PUD 4-86"), which includes the R1-13.5 District and the R1-
9.5 District.
Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of
that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of , 1986, entered into
between Tandem Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie
(hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms
111 and conditions of PUD 4-86, and is hereby made a part hereof.
Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings:
A. PUD 4-86 is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide Plan of the
City.
B. PUD 4-86 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and
unified environment within its own boundaries.
C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of
the City Code, which are contained in PUD 4-86, are justified by the
design of the development described therein.
D. PUD 4-86 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that
its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete
unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit.
Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and
hereby is, removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
Planned Unit Development 4-86 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each
district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B,
shall be and are amended accordingly.
Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their ) -
entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
IrL Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the. City of Eden
Prairie on the 3rd day of July, 1986, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 1st day of
July, 1986.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
I..
I.,I',1
•
SINGLE 9.5
4irThat part of the Northwest and Northeast Quarter of Section 22, Township
- 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: •
Commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 22; thence South 01
• degrees 32 minutes 30 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the north
south Quarter line of said Section 22 a distance of 191.77 feet; thence South'.88
degrees 27 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 60.00 feet to the actual point
of beginning; thence easterly along a tangential curve concave to the south
having a central angle of 27 degrees.27-minutes 30 seconds and a radius of
289.17 feet for a distance of 138.50 ,feet; thence South 61 degrees 00.minutes 00
seconds East, tan
gent to the last described-curve, a distance of 151.39 feet;-- •
thence southeasterly along a tangential curve concave.to the,aouthwest:having a
• central angle of 77 degrees 16 minutes 32 seconds and a-.radius of'150.00 feet...
for a distance of•202.31 feet; thence southwesterly along a compound curve
having a central angle of 15 degrees 43 minutes 28 seconds and•a•radius of
560.00 feet for a distance of 153.69 feet;' thence South.32 degrees-00 einutee 00
seconds West, tangent to the last-described curve, a distance of 237.85 feet;
thence aoutherly along a tangential curve concave to the east_haying a central
angle of 17 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds and a radius of-498'.05 feet-for •
a
distance of 147.77 feet; thence southwesterly along a reverse`curve having a
central angle of 26 degrees 31 minutes 40 seconds and a radius of.25000 feet
for a distance of 115.75 feet; thence southerly along a.reverse curve having a
central angle of 27 degrees 28 minutes 10 seconds and a-radius-:of"89.00.feet`for
a distance of 42.67 feet; thence westerly along a reverse curve'having,a central
angle of 167 degrees 28 minutes 58 seconds and a radius.of_50.00 feet:'for a
distance of 146.15 feet; thence North 01 degrees 32 minutes 30_-seconds':West,
tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 198.59 feet; thence North 68
degrees 59 minutes 49 seconds West a distance of 86.00 feet;;thence-North 30
degrees 21 minutes 38 seconds West a distance of 65.00 feet; thence North 65
degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 65.00 feat;._thence North 02
degrees 03 minutes 29 seconds East a distance of 55.00 feet;'thenceGNorth 70
degrees 51 minutes 42 seconds West a distance of 50.00 feet; thence South 58
degrees 37 minutes 36 seconds West a distance of 256.77 feet;_thence North 30
degrees 21 minutes 38 seconds West a distance of 91.17 feet; 'thence northerly
along a tangential curve concave to the east having a.central'-'angle of 88
degrees 59 minutes 14 seconds and a radius of 9.00 feet for a distance'of 13.98
feet; thence North 58 degrees 37 minutes 36 seconds East, tangent to the last
described curve a distance of 334.63 feet thence northeasterly along ;a.
tangential curve concave to the northwest having a central angle of 57 degrees
05 minutes 06 seconds and a radius of 316.48 feet for a distance of.315.32 feet;
thence North 01 degrees 32 minutes 30 seconds East, tangent to' the last
described curve, a distance of 106.92 feet to the point of beginning.`-
1 SN8
SINGLE 13.5
4( That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 22, Township 116, Range
22, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows:
Commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 22; thence South 01
degrees 32 minutes 30 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the north-south
Quarter line of said Section 22 a distance of 191.77 feet; thence South 88
degrees 27 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 60.00 feet to the actual point
of beginning; thence easterly along a tangential curve concave to the south
having a central angle of 27 degrees 27 minutes 30 seconds and a radius
of 289.17 feet for a distance of 138.50 feet; thence South 61 degrees 00 minutes
00 seconds East, tangent to ,.he last described curve, a distance of 151.39 feet;
thence southeasterly along a tangential curve concave to the southwest having a
central angle of 77 degrees 16 minutes 32 seconds and a radius of 150.00 feet
for a distance of 202.31 feet; thence southwesterly along a compound curve
having a central angle of 15 degrees 43 minutes 28 seconds and a radius of
560.00 feet for a distance of 153.69 feet; thence South 32 degrees, 00 minutes,
00 seconds West, tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 237.85 feet;
thence Southerly along a tangential curve concave to the east having a central
angle of 17 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds and a radius of 498.05 feet for a
distance of 147.77 feet; thence southwesterly along a reverse curve having a
central angle of 26 degrees 31 minutes 40 seconds and a radius of 250.00 feet
for a distance of 115.75 feet; thence southerly along a reverse curve having a
central angle of 27 degrees 28 minutes 10 seconds and a radius of 89.00 feet for
a distance of 42.67 feet; thence westerly along a reverse curve having a central
angle of 167 degrees 28 minutes 58 seconds and a radius of 50.00 feet for a
distance of 146.15 feet; thence South 1 degree 32 minutes 30 seconds West, not
tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 296.00 feet; thence North 49
degrees 15 minutes 15 seconds East a distance of 289.22 feet; thence North 21
degrees 15 minutes 15 seconds East a distance of 240.00 feet; thence North 29
degrees 46 minutes 47 seconds East a distance of 240.62 feet; thence North 31
degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 140.48 feet; thence North 11
degrees 45 minutes 15 seconds East a distance of 250.00 feet; thence North 27
degrees 09 minutes 45 seconds East a distance of 82.13 feet; thence
northwesterly along a non-tangential curve concave to the southeast having a
central angle of 5 degrees 41 minutes 27 seconds and a radius of 758.51 feet for
a distance of 75.34 feet, the chord of said curve bears North 54 degrees 19
minutes 26 seconds West; thence North 32 degrees 49 minutes 51 seconds East, not
tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 20.00 feet; thence
Northwesterly along a non-tangential curve concave to the Southwest having a
central angle of 10 degrees 53 minutes 44 seconds and a radius of 778.51 feet
for a distance of 148.05 feet, the chord of said curve bears North 62 degrees 37
minutes 01 seconds West; thence North 68 degrees 03 minutes 53 seconds West,
tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 157.92 feet; thence
northwesterly along a tangential curve concave to the northeast having a central
angle of 11 degrees 10 minutes 38 seconds and a radius of 858.51 feet for a
distance of 167.48 feet; thence southerly along a non-tangential curve concave
to the East having a central angle of 23 degrees 52 minutes 21 seconds and a
radius of 274.23 feet for a distance of 114.26 feet, the chord of said curve
bears South 13 degrees 28 minutes 41 seconds West; thence South 01 degrees 32
minutes 30 seconds West, tangent to the last described curve, a distance of
60.00 feet to the point of beginning.
ISyBA
Westover Woods
PUD-DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1986, by
Tandem Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer,"
and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept
of 15 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Change
from Rural to PUD-4-86, which includes the R1-13.5 and R1-9.5 Districts, and
Preliminary Plat of approximately 15 acres into 39 single family lots and two
outlots, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter
referred to as "the property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #28-86,
Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of
said property as follows:
1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the
materials revised and dated May 16, 1986, reviewed and approved by
the City Council on June 3, 1986, and attached hereto as Exhibit B,
subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. --
Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the a
property in any other respect or manner than provided herein.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by
Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of
all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Developer agrees that prior to release by the City of the final
plat, Developer shall dedicate Outlot B to the City, free and clear
of all liens, encumbrances, and mortgages.
I(
•
4. Developer agrees to notify the City and the Watershed District at
least 48 hours in advance of any grading, or tree removal, on the
property.
Prior to issuance of any permit for grading upon the property,
Developer agrees to implement erosion control measures and adequate
protective measures for areas to be preserved and areas where
grading is not to occur, and to receive City approval of said
measures. Prior to approval by the City, the Developer must call
for on-site inspection of the property by the City, and defects in
materials and workmanship in the implementation of said measures
shall then be determined by the City. Defects in materials or
workmanship shall then be corrected by the Developer, reinspected
and approved by the City prior to issuance of the grading permit by
the City. Approval of materials and workmanship may be subject to
such conditions as the City may impose at the time of acceptance.
5. Developer agrees to confine grading to that area of the property
within the construction limits as shown on Exhibit B. Developer
shall place snow fencing at the construction limits within the
wooded areas of the property prior to any grading upon the property.
Prior to issuance of any grading permit, Developer shall submit to
the Director of Planning and receive the Director's approval of a
tree inventory of those trees within the construction area and
within 25 ft. outside of the construction area, indicating the size,
type, and location of all trees twelve (12) inches in diameter, or
greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground level. •
If any such trees are removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the
construction area, Developer agrees that prior to issuance of any
building permit for the property, Developer shall submit to the
Director of Planning, and receive the Director's approval of a
replacement plan for all trees removed, damaged, or destroyed
outside of the construction area. Developer further agrees that
said trees shall be replaced by similar tree species and that the
trees used for replacement shall be no less than six inches in
diameter. The amount of trees to be replaced shall be determined by
the Director of Planning, using a square inch per square inch basis,
according to the area of the circle created by a cross sectional cut
through the diameter of a tree as measured 4.5 feet above the
ground.
If a tree replacement plan is required, Developer agrees that, prior
to issuance of any building permit, Developer shall submit a bond,
or letter of credit, guaranteeing completion of all tree replacement
work as approved by the Director of Planning. The amount of the
bond, or letter of credit, shall be 150% of the approved estimated
cost of implementation of all tree replacement work and shall be in
such form and contain such other provisions and terms as may be
required by the Director of Planning. Developer agrees to prepare
and submit for approval to the Director of Planning a written
estimate of the costs of the tree replacement work to be completed.
I
I.
•
•
•
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall
implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements listed
above in said plans, as approved by the Director of Planning.
6. Concurrent with construction of utilities on the property, Developer
agrees to construct, or cause to be constructed, a five-foot wide,
five-inch thick concrete sidewalk along both sides of Cumberland
Road, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said sidewalk
shall be constructed in accordance with the terms and conditions of
Exhibit C, attached hereto.
7. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City
Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water,
storm sewer, and erosion control for the property.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or
cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said
plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit •
C, attached hereto.
8. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property,
Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the
Director's approval of an overall development plan, including the •
various elevations of each unit type to be built on the property.
Said development plan shall depict which unit type is to be built
upon each lot. Developer agrees that no two substantially similar
unit types shall be located adjacent to each other, directly across
from each other, or diagonally across from each other.
9. As part of the Planned Unit Development approval for the property,
City herein grants the following variances to the requirements of
Chapter 11 of the City Code:
A. Front yard setback for the lots fronting Knollwood Drive,
Street A, and Street B, as depicted in Exhibit B, shall be
25 ft.
B. On lots in the R1-13.5 portion of the property as described
in Exhibit A, attached hereto, where Developer intends to
save trees, Developer shall submit to the Director of '
Planning, and receive the Director's approval of building
plans indicating side yard setbacks of a minimum of 5 ft. on
one side of the lot. The total of both side yard setbacks
shall be 25 ft. In no case will there be less than 20 ft.
between structures in the R1-13.5 portion of the property.
10. Developer acknowledges the existence of pending assessments against
the property for the improvement of Anderson Lakes Parkway and ##
agrees that the property is benefitted to the full extent of the
improvement. It is agreed by City and Developer that construction
of Anderson Lakes Parkway allows the property to be developed.
IC
-1
CWestover Woods
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-155
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE 29-86-PUD-4-86 AND,ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 29-86-PUD-4-86 was adopted and ordered published at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 1st day of
July, 1986;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 29-86-PUD-4-86, which
is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that
said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of
said ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
IL body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 29-86-PUD-4-86 shall be recorded in the ordinance
book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph 8`
herein, within 20 days after said publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on July 1, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
c
Westover Woods
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 29-86-PUD-4-86
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located south of
C. Anderson Lakes Parkway and Nuew Cumberland Road, known as Anderson Lakes Center,
from the Rural District to the PUD 4-86 District, which includes the R1-13.5 and R1-
9.5 Districts, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement.
Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this
property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
/s/John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson
City Clerk Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the _day of , 1986.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
Anderson Lakes Center
t CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 30-86
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTIDN 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the Rural District and be placed in the C-Reg-Ser District.
Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be,
and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
C-Reg-Ser District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to
in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are
amended accordingly.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of
that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of , entered into
between Anderson Lakes Center Partnership, a Minnesota partnership, and the City of
Eden Prairie, which Agreement is hereby made a part hereof.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 3rd day of June, 1986, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 1st day of
July, 1986.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
Exhibit A
Zoning
That part of Outlot B, Eden Place Apartments,
according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the
following described line:
Beginning at point on the westerly line of said
Out lot B- 485.49 feet northerly of the southwest
corner of said outlot B; thence North B9 degrees
47 minutes 37 seconds East 70.13 feet; thence
South 77 degrees 21 minutes 45 seconds East 405.79
feet to the east line of said Outlot 8 and said
line there terminating, except the east 80.00 feet'
of said Outlot_B. For the purpose of this
description the south line of said Outlot B has an
assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 36 minutes 30
seconds West.
Platting
Outlot 8, Eden Place Apartments, Hennepin County
Anderson Lakes Center
ir
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1986, by
Anderson Lakes Center Partnership, a Minnesota general partnership, hereinafter
referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Change from Rural
to Neighborhood Commercial on 4.3 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 15 acres into three
lots and two outlots, for construction of a retail center, situated in Hennepin
County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and
made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the property;"
IL NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #30-86,
Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of
said property as follows:
1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the
materials revised and dated , 1986, reviewed and approved
by the City Council on June 3, 1986, and attached hereto as Exhibit
B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein.
Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the
property in any other respect or manner than provided herein.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by
Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of
all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth '1
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Developer agrees that, prior to construction of any temporary access
to Highway #169, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and
Minnesota Department of Transportation, and receive the City
Engineer's and Minnesota Department of Transportation's approval of
plans for said temporary access. No permanent direct access to
Highway #169 shall be allowed.
4. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City
Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water,
storm sewer, and erosion control for the property.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or
cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said
plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit
C, attached hereto.
5. Developer shall notify the City and the Watershed District 48 hours
prior to any grading, tree removal, or tree cutting on the property.
Prior to issuance of any permit for grading upon the property,
Developer agrees to implement erosion control measures and adequate
protective measures for areas to be preserved and areas where
grading is not to occur, and to receive City approvai of said
measures. Prior to approval by the City, the Developermust call
for on-site inspection of the property by the City, and defects in
materials and workmanship in the implementation of said measures
shall then be determined by the City. Defects in materials •or
workmanship shall then be corrected by the Developer, reinspected
and approved by the City prior to issuance of the grading permit by
the City. Approval of materials and workmanship may be subject to
such conditions as the City may impose at the time of acceptance.
6. Developer agrees to confine grading to that area of the property
IL within the construction limits as shown on Exhibit B.
7. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property,
Developer agrees to submit to the Director of Planning, and receive
the Director's approval of details for the lighting on the property.
Developer agrees that said lighting shall be a maximum of 20 ft.. in
height, designed with down-cast, cut-off luminars to avoid glare off
the property.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer agrees 'to.
construct, or implement, or cause to be constructed, or implemented,
those plans listed above, as approved by the Director of Planning. 1
8. Developer agrees that signage for the property shall be constructed
and installed in accordance with the detailed design criteria listed,
in Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Anderson Lakes Center
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-156
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE 30-86 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 30-86 was adopted and ordered published at a regular .
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 1st day of July,
1986;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 30-86, which is
attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said;
text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said
ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 30-86 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
alongwith
proof of publication required by paragraph B herein,
within 20 days after said publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on July 1, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
7
Anderson Lakes Center
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 30-86
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS:OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND>SECTION 11.99,
WHICH,;AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary: This Ordinance . allows rezoning of land located at the
northwest corner of Highway #169 and Anderson Lakes Parkway, known as Anderson Lakes..
Center, from the Rural District to the C-Reg-Ser District, subject to the terms and
Ilk conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance,
gives the full legal description of this property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
/s/John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson
City Clerk Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1986.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
lir
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: City Manager Carl J. Jullie
FROM: Assistant to the City Manager Craig Oawson
SUBJECT: Updated Joint Powers Agreement - South Hennepin Human
Services Council
DATE: June 27, 1986
During the past four months the Board of Directors of the South Hennepin Human
Services Council (SHHSC) has been in the process of updating the joint powers
agreement signed by the Cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Bloomington, and
Richfield in 1971. The need for revisions was apparent even from a cursory
review of the agreement: Eden Prairie and Edina were referred to as "Villages",
and the Human Services Council had the title "Human Services Planning Board".
The SHHSC Board of Directors had also chosen the theme, "Renewing the
Commitment," in recognition of its 15th year of existence, and believed that
revising the agreement would underscore that commitment.
As proposed by the SHHSC Board and reviewed by the Richfield City Attorney's
Office, the revised joint powers agreement contains few substantive changes.
Article IV, Sec. 1 specifies that one of the four appointees from a City to the
Board of Dirctors shall be a member of the City Council. Language in the
existing agreement implied but did not specify this arrangement. Article VI,
Sec. 12 would have SHHSC "conduct human services programs within the parties
(i.e., cities), provided that it first inform the City Council of each of the
parties of the intent to provide such services." The existing agreement
requires that each City Council approve a program before it is undertaken. The
proposed language reflects current practice. Article VI, Sec. 14 is a new
provision stating SHHSC's non-discrimination policy on the Board of Oirectors.
Several minor changes have also been made for clarity and readability.
Confusion about City Council, Human Services Council, Human Services Board, and
Board of Oirectors within the agreement should now have been remedied. Gender-
inclusive nouns and pronouns have been added where appropriate. Renumbering of
articles and sections has been made where necessary after consolidations or
additions within the document.
RECOMMENDATIDN: It is recommended that the City Council approve the proposed
revised joint powers agreement for the South Hennepin Human Services Council and
authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute the agreement. The proposed
agreement clarifies the powers and responsibilities of SHHSC and brings it up to
date with requirements of joint powers bodies.
CWD:jdp
i
,
Revised 6/11/86
Ir
SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL
JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
The parties to this Agreement are governmental units of the
State of Minnesota. This Agreement is mace pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59.
ARTICLE I. GENERAL PURPOSE
Section 1. The general purpose of this agreement is to
provide an organization through which the parties may jointly
and cooperatively coordinate the providina of human services,
both publicly and privately, in the territory of the respective
parties.
Section 2. The organization formed by in this agreement,
41
being governmental in nature, shall not be used or operated for
the pecuniary gain, directly or indirectly, of any party or any
member of its board. The organization shall not participate or
intervene in a political campaign on behalf of any candidate for
public office.
ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS
Section 1. For the purposes of this agreement the terms
defined in this section have the meanings given them.
Section 2. "South Hennepin Human Services Council", or
"Council", means the organization created pursuant to this
agreement, which is formally known as the "South Hennepin Human a
Services Council".
ILSection 3. "Board"' means the board of directors of the
•
Council.
-1-
• • . .
. .
, •
. .
. .
. .
•
. .
. .
. . ,
Section 3. A vacancy in the office of directors is filled
Irby the Council of the city appointing the director. In the
event the director whose position becomes vacant was also an
• officer, th2 board shall fill the vacancy in that office.
•
Section 4. In appointing members of the board each city
council
will appoint one member from the city council, and give
• consideration to health professionals, administrative officials,
senior citizens, young adults of voting age, persons engaged in
law enforcement, members of the clergy, representatives of
. -
business and labor and others with special concerns related to
Council activities so that the board may be a representative
• sampling of the population of all of the parties. The city
councils should endeavor to avoid having more than one half of
the directors from any one group, profession or interest. The
• board shall advise the parties of the names and occupations of
each of its directors. The council of a party, however, shall
have complete authority to appoint and to remove, at any time, a
director appointed by it. Subject to such restrictions and
requirements as the city council may require. If the city
council does impose restrictions or requirements on its
directors, the directors must inform the board of those
restrictions or requirements.
• -3-
4( •
. . .•
START
TA
The images appearing between this point and the End of Retake target
are true, accurate, and complete copies of records that previously were
not filmed or were filmed incorrectly.
•
Revised 6/11/86
SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL
JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
The parties to this Agreement are governmental units of the
State of Minnesota. This Agreement is mace pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59.
ARTICLE I. GENERAL PURPOSE
Section 1. The general purpose of this agreement is to
provide an organization through which the parties may Jointly
and cooperatively coordinate the providing of human services,
both publicly and privately, in the territory of the respective
parties.
Section 2. The organization formed by in this agreement,
being governmental in nature, shall not be used or operated for
the pecuniary gain, directly or indirectly, of any party or any
member of its board. The organization shall not particicate or •
intervene in a political campaign on behalf of any candidate for
public office.
ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS
Section 1. For the purposes of this agreement the terms
defined in this section have the meanings given them.
1.
Section 2. "South Hennepin Human Services.Council", or
"Council", means the organization created pursuant to this
agreement, which is formally known as the "South Hennepin Human
Services Council".
Section 3. "Board"' means the board of directors of the
Council.
-1-
J�y^i
Section 4. "City council" means the governing body of a
party. �.
Section 5. "Party" means a governmental unit which enters
into this section.
Section 6. "Governmental unit" means a city, however
organized.
Section 7. "Human services" includes but is not limited to
services and facilities to deal with and serve human needs.
ARTICLE III. PARTIES
Section 1. The initial parties to this agreement are the
following governmental units:
City of Bloomington
City of Eden Prairie
City of Edina
City of Richfield
ARTICLE IV. - GOVERNING PODY
Section 1. The governing body of the Council is the
board. Each party is entitled to four directors. A director
has one vote; there is no proxy voting. The city council of
each party shall appoint its four directors for terms of two
years, who shall remain until such directors' successors are
selected and qualified. The city council may also at its
discretion rescind such appointment. In January of each year
each city council shall make two regular appointments of
directors whose terms shall be for two years commencing on the
following February 1. Directors serve without compensation from
the Council.
Section 2. A quorum of the board consists of nine directors
with one director from each party.
-2-
Section 3. A vacancy in the office of directors is filled
by the Council of the city appointing the director. In the
event the director whose position becomes vacant was also an
officer, the board shall fill the vacancy in that office.
Section 4. In appointing members of the board each city
council will appoint one member from the city council, and give
consideration to health professionals, administrative officials,
senior citizens, young adults of voting age, persons engaged in
law enforcement, members of the clergy, representatives of
business and labor and others with special concerns related to
Council activities so that the board may be a reoresentative
sampling of the population of all of the parties. The city
councils should endeavor to avoid having more than one half of
the directors from any one group, profession or interest. The
I. board shall advise the parties of the names and occupations of
each of its directors. The council of a party, however, shall
have complete authority to appoint and to remove, at any time, a
director appointed by it. Subject to such restrictions and
requirements as the city council may require. If the city
council does impose restrictions or requirements on its
directors, the directors must inform the board of those � .
restrictions or requirements.
•
-3-
•
ARTICLE V. MEETINGS - ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Section 1. At the organizational meeting of the board and
in February of each year, the board shall elect from its members
a chair, a vice-chair, a secretary and a treasurer.
Section 2. In February of each year, the board of directors
shall adopt or amend rules and regulations governing its
procedures, including the time, place and frequency of its
regular meetings and the manner of calling special meetings.
Such rules and regulations must provide for an annual meeting of
the Council. The rules and regulations may be amended from time
to time subject to the provisions of this agreement.
Section 3. The board may create an executive committee and
other committees as it may deem necessary pursuant to its
by-laws. The executive committee shall include at least one x ,
director from each of the cities and the board may authorize it
to exercise specified powers of the board of directors between
board meetings, subject to the limitations imposed upon it by
the board.
ARTICLE VI. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COUNCIL
Section 1. The powers and duties of the Council acting
through the board include the powers set forth in this section.
Section 2. It may employ a person to act as executive
director of the Council.
Section 3. It may make such contracts as the board deems
neccessary and advisable to make effective any power to be
exercised by the Council pursuant to the provisions of this
agreement.
-4-
END OF
RETAKE
•
•
Section 4. It may employ such other persons as it deems •
ir necessary to accomplish its powers and responsibilities.
Persons may be employed on a full-time, part-time or consulting
basis, as the board determines.
Section 5. It may conduct research and investigation
regarding existing and possible future human services facilities
and programs and may develop a proposed plan for providing and
coordinating of human services in any or all of the areas of (a)
mental health, (b) mental retardation, (c) drug and alcohol
abuse, (d) family counseling and (e) other related or similar
problems.
Section 6. It may prepare an inventory of human service
facilities, services and agencies, both public and private,
available to persons residing in the cities. It may make a cost
analysis of any existing or proposed human services programs,
may call attention to human service needs and human services
programs and may undertake to coordinate human service programs,
public and private, within the territory of the cities.
• Section 7. It may apply for and receive financial support
in the form of loans or grants from any organization or agency.
in order to accomplish its purposes and may enter into the'.
agreements necessary to obtain that support.
-5-
41.
Section A. It may invest and reinvest funds not needed for
current operating expenses, if any, in the manner applicable by f
law to statutory cities. The council may not incur obligations
in excess of funds available to it.
Section 9. It may contract for space, material and
supplies.
Section 10. It must make a financial accounting and report
to the parties at least once each year. Its books and records
shall be available and open to examination to authorized
representatives of the parties at all reasonable times.
Section 11. It may provide for the indemnification of
directors, officers and employees against reasonable costs and
expenses incurred by those persons in connection with any
action, suit or proceeding in which the person may be involved
by reason of being a director, officer, or employee, except
amounts paid or payable to the board itself, and except in
relation to matters as to which the person shall be finally
adjudged in any action, suit or proceeding to have been derelict
in the performance of duties as such director, officer or
employee. The indemnification need not be exclusive of other
rights to which any such person would otherwise be entitled as a
matter of law.
Section 12. It may conduct human service programs within
the parties, provided that, it first inform the city of each of
the parties of the intent to provide such services. Any such
program may be submitted to the parties in conjunction with the
annual budget of the organization, or it may be submitted
between budgets at any time.
-6-
Section 13. It may exercise any other power necessary and
4rconvenient to the implementation of its powers and duties under
the provisions of this agreement.
Section 14. No director may on the basis of sex, race,
creed, national origin, color, religion, ape, or disability, be
excluded from the participation on all decisions of the board.
Nor may a director be treated differently from the other
directors. All directors shall have the same voice on the
board.
ARTICLE VII. FINANCIAL MATTERS
Section 1. Council funds may be expended by the board in
accordance with the procedures established by law for the
expenditure of funds by statutory cities. Orders, checks and
drafts shall be signed by the chair or vice-chair or other
officers as the bylaws may designate. Other legal instruments
shall be executed on behalf of the Council as provided in the
bylaws.
Section 2. Contracts shall be let and purchases made in
conformance with the legal requirements applicable to contracts
and purchases of optional Plan B cities and for such purposes
the executive director, if arty, shall be deemed to occupy a
position equivalent to that of a city manager.
Section 3. The parties are not be required to provide funds
to the Council, but any parties may do so. The board is (1)
strictly accountable for all funds received and for all funds
it expended by it, (2) must have an annual audit of its books, and
fit• (3) must make an annual report of all of its receipts and
disbursements to each of the parties.
-7-
Section 4. A proposed annual budget must be formulated by
the board and must be submitted to the parties on or before
1
August 1. The budget shall be deemed approved by a party
unless, prior to October 10 of the year involved, the party
gives notice in writing to the Council that it is withdrawing
from the organization. The board may revise its budget in
response to or as a result of a notice from any city that it
proposes to withdraw from the organization. Final -,action
adopting an annual budget year shall be taken by the board on or
before November 1.
Section 5. Except as authorized by law, no member of the
board or other public officer of ,the organization who is
authorized to take part in any manner in the making of any sale,
lease or contract in may voluntarily have a personal, financial
interest in such transaction or personally benefit financially
therefrom. A director may not be employed to perform or be
compensated for the performance of services for the Council.
Section 6. The fiscal year of the Council is the caiender
year.
ARTICLg VIII. DURAIICN
Section 1. The Council shall continue from yearr to year
unless the number of parties is less than three.
, -8-•
Section 1. (cont'd)
Withdrawal of a party..member-at the end of January of any,year
Al may be accomplished by that city's, filing a written notice
thereof with the board by October 10 of the preceding year,
giving notice of withdrawal as of-the following January 31. The
withdrawing party shall continue to be a party to this agreement
until the effective date of such notice of withdrawal. The
South Hennepin Human Services Council may also be terminated by
mutual agreement of all of the parties at any time.
Section 2. If a party withdraws from the Council before the
termination of the Council, the party has no claim to the assets
of the Council. If the Council is terminated by mutual
agreement of all of the parties to the agreement, surplus monies
of the Council shall be returned to the parties in proportion to
ILtheir respective contributions. If there have been no such
contributions by such parties, surplus monies of the Council
shall, upon termination of the Council, be returned to the
parties in equal shares.
-9-
•
ARTICLE IX. EFFECTIVE DATE ,
Section 1. This agreement is effective on the date on which (
a fully executed copy of this agreement together with a
certified copy of a city council resolution of each of the
parties authorizing its execution is filed,with the City Clerk
of each city. This agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts each of which may be considered an original copy.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have caused this
agreement to be signed by their duly authorized offices as of
the date indicated after their respective executives.
CITY'OF-BLOOMINGTON
By„
Its Mayor
Date By
Its Manager
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By
Its Mayor
Date By_
Its Manager
CITY OF EDINA
By
Its Mayor
Date By
Its Manager
CITY OF RICHFIELD
By
Its Mayor
Date By
Its Manager
-10- ..N
1O
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-157
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LAKE PARK
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT
TO THE OVERALL MITCHELL LAKE 1976 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for
the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the Lake Park development is considered a proper amendment to the
overall Mitchell Lake 1976 Planned Unit Development Concept; and,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the
request of Rottland Construction for PUD Concept Amendment approval to the overall
Mitchell Lake 1976 Planned Unit Development Concept for Lake Park and recommended
approval of the PUD Concept Amendment to the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on.July 1, 1986;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Lake Park PUD Concept Amendment, being in Hennepin County,
Minnesota, and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval to
the overall Mitchell Lake 1976 Planned Unit Development Concept as
outlined in the application materials for Lake Park.
3. That the PUD Concept Amendment meets the recommendations of the
Planning Commission dated June 9, 1986.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 1st day of July, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
4
I��"1I
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #86-158
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LAKE PARK FOR
ROTTLUND COMPANY, INC.
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Lake.Park for Rottlund Company, Inc., dated June 24,
1986, consisting of 16.7 acres into 102 lots for construction of 98 townhome units,
a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the
provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments
thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 1st day of July, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
STAFF REPORT
(
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
i RbU6H: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: June 6, 1986
PROJECT: Lake Park Townhomes
LOCATION: South and east of Timber Lakes Drive, west of County Road #4
APPLICANT: Rottlund Construction
FEE OWNER: Norwest Banks
REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 16.7 acres.
2. Zoning District Amendment and Planned Unit Development
District Review on 16.7 acres.
3. Preliminary Plat of 16.7 acres into 102 lots for the
construction of 98 townhome units.
® i� 13 5 = 8-12 F r e,`.:';
11• Background =,�4 = `I P� moaau VIM 14
lim ' ���®et
This site is currently guided Medium TI l• at s 20 �"�
Density Residential and was zoned to ® '•'6 PUB • c;coMM `�
RM-6.5 according to a 1976 Planned r' i• ' I 43-8
Unit Development (PUD) and Zoning . I.5 F �•. •' V :H .
request by Pemtom. The approved PUD r 1� `\il` 3i 9-I
depicted a total of 84 units on this / �.� ' }ar61,. I
site. To date, six units have been 1t 325I Wang -2 ee }
constructed on approximately one ► PRK A!.
acre of land, which is not included Gtato' _ 328_ •2-8
in the current request for a number r ;�
of units and density. k.'f' r ' .2` Ng' 1, ,(
9 guided ,rr ��� w� /Surrounding land area is , 1T Avg Medium Density to the • west and .:;;:•,�' /,
north, and Low Density Residential 4 d@ .:;,:; :; ` I
and Industrial to the west across I/ r m '•.•.:••• ® e ' '
County Road #4. t •- :•;•,•;., II /' I
This 16.7-acre site is currently i r •••••�••''
zoned RM-6.5. R'•'1��•'`... ='�' / /
'. I I /c57
Site Plan
PROPOSED SITE ,/
41. The site plan depicts the con-
struction of 98 townhome units on ' f/
AREA LOCATION MAP t ;
Lake Park Townhomes 2 June 6, 1986
16.7 acres of land at a density of 5.9 units per acre. The RM-6.5 zoning district
would permit a density of 6.7 units per acre, or a total of 112 units.
Building and parking areas meet minimum setback requirements from County Road #4 and
Timber Lakes Drive.
Parking required for townhomes is two spaces per unit with one enclosed. A double-
car garage and two exterior parking spaces are proposed for each unit. The
dimension of the interior garage space is 17.5 feet. The Code requirement for
enclosed garage spaces is a 10' x 2D' space per vehicle. Therefore, only credit for
one interior space can be granted per unit. The width of the parking space in front
of the garage is also 17.5 feet wide, meaning credit for only one outdoor space
could be granted since the dimensional requirement for on-grade parking is a 9' x
20' parking stall. Although the site plan meets the Code requirement for two spaces
per unit, the width of the space in front of each garage should be increased to 18
feet to permit two standard parking spaces.
A total of 22 overflow parking spaces (not in front of the garage) are provided for
guest parking. Considering that the site is served by a private drive of 25 feet in
width, more guest parking is needed so cars will not be parked in the fire lanes or
obstruct emergency vehicle access. An additional 26 overflow parking spaces should
be provided. This would provide one overflow parking space for every two units.
There is adequate room on-site to provide additional parking spaces in appropriate
areas which are centrally located to each of the townhome clusters.
tAccess is provided to this site by a 25-foot wide private drive. Since in many
cases only 20 feet of clear space is provided between the garage doors and the
access drive, cars are likely to protrude out into the access lane. 25 feet of
parking areas should be provided behind each garage. There is adequate room on-site
to move the buildings farther away from the driveway.
The driveway access point in the third addition should be relocated farther to the
south to provide a minimum of a 125-foot center-to-center offset dimension from the
driveway access to the townhomes on the west side of the roadway.
Grading
Since the site is relatively level, overall grading is minimal. Proposed grading
will maintain the existing berming along County Road #4 and Timber Lakes Drive. In
some cases, additional berming is provided to better screen parking and break up
views of the garage door side of the units from Timber Lakes Drive. A ponding area
will be constructed in the center of the site for storm water retention and as a
site amenity. The pond will be a private pond and maintained by the Homeowners'
Association. The ultimate discharge of the pond is into Mitchell Lake by connection ..
to an existing storm sewer system in Timber Lakes Drive.
Architecture
Three building types are proposed including three, four, and six-unit buildings.
The majority of buildings are four units. Elevations for all buildings will be
ir similar. Four color schemes are proposed at this time to add variety. Buildings
located in close proximity to each other will have a common color scheme to create a
village-like identity. The townhomes proposed to the existing townhomes will be
painted to match the existing colors in order to provide for continuity (see
attached letters).
i_ )y!
Lake Park Townhomes 3 June 6, 1986
Landscaping
For a project of this size, a total of 560 caliper inches would be required. A
total of 642 caliper inches are provided. The combination of plantings and berming
will help screen parking areas and break up the views of the building mass as viewed
from the private driveway serving the project.
Curbing should be required along the edge of all private driveways and parking
areas. This is similar to the approach utilized in the Hipps townhomes in Edenvale
and in the Preserve. Curbing helps maintain plant materials and grass area and
avoids situations like the Richard Miller townhomes, where cars have backed over the
sod and into the landscaping areas, also snow removal becomes sod removal in the
winter.
Trails/Sidewalks
Concurrent with the construction of this project, a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk
will be constructed by the developer along the south and east sides of Timber Lakes
Drive from County Road #4 to the southern boundary limits. In addition, interior
trails are proposed within the site to provide a way of internal access out to the
sidewalk system.
Road Construction
The developer has agreed to pay for all costs of a park access road to future Miller
Park to the south. In addition, the developer has agreed to dedicate additional
right-of-way to accommodate the proposed jog in the parked access road where shown
on the attached park diagram. The actual financial mechanism for the payment of the
road construction is yet to be decided. This will be either through a special
assessment agreement over the entire 16.7 acres, or a cash escrow account for the
cost of the road would be set up in advance. The method of financing the roadway
construction must be determined concurrent with the final platting of the property
and the preparation of the developer's agreement.
Traffic
Total traffic expected to be generated from this site for the existing and proposed
townhomes based on 7 trips/unit (98 units) would be a total of 686 trips or 69 trips
in the peak hour. This compares with the approved PUD of 588 daily trips or 58 in
the peak hour. This represents a 14% increase in traffic. With the completion of
the park access road to the south, this site will have the opportunity to distribute
the traffic more evenly in/out from County Road #4.
Utilities
All utilities proposed within this project will be private. Sewer and water service
can be provided to this site by connection to existing sewer services in Timber
Lakes Drive. Storm water run-off is proposed to drain into existing storm sewer
lines in Timber Lakes Drive. The ultimate discharge is into Mitchell Lake.
( The Fire Marshal has reviewed the project and has indicated that all buildings in
excess of 8,500 square feet must be sprinkled. In addition, eight fire hydrants
will be needed to serve the project and two of the existing fire hydrants will need
Lake Park Townhomes 4 June 6, 1986
to be relocated to provide better fire protection. Prior to building permit
issuance, the proponent should meet with the Fire Marshal to discuss the changes in
the plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the request for Planned Unit Development Concept
Amendment, Zoning District Amendment, and Preliminary Plat on 16.7 acres based on
plans dated May 16, 1986, and May 30, 1986, subject to the recommendations contained
in the Staff Report, dated June 6, 1986, and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Modify the site plan to provide 26 additional overflow parking
spaces.
B. Modify the site plan to provide a minimum of 25 feet of paved area
between the back of the garages and the edge of the driveway area.
C. Modify the site plan to provide for curbing along all driveways and
parking areas.
D. Modify the driveway location of Phase III to be a minimum of 125
feet on center, offset from the driveway entrance on the west side
ILof Timber Lakes Drive.
E. Provide a color scheme keyed to specific building types.
2. Prior to Final Plat, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off, erosion control, and utility
plans for review by the City Engineer.
3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
B. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 4B hours in advance
of grading.
C. Submit examples of proposed exterior building materials for review. 1 `
D. Submit plans for review by the Fire Marshal.
4. All cost of the roadway construction for access into future Miller Park
shall be borne by the developer. The developer shall either enter into a
special assessment agreement with the City based on 16.7 acres, or provide a
IL cash escrow in an amount to be determined by the City Engineer both of which
to be determined prior to the final platting of the property.
5. Construction of a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the south and east
sides of Timber Lakes Drive.
TIMBER LAKES TOWNHOMES ASSOCIATION
P.O.Box 443-035
. Eden Prairie,MN 55344 n
April 3, 1986
Rottlund Company, Inc.
P.O. Box 383
Osseo, MN 55369
Attention: Mr. Bud Rotter
Subject: Review of Proposed Development - Outlot B
Dear Mr. Rotter:
This is to advise you that this Association's Board of Directors
reviewed your development proposal at our monthly meeting on
March 4.
Based on your stipulation that the proposed townhouses adjacent
to our property would meet the requirements listed below, the
Board of Directors had no objections to your proposal.
• Exteriors of the units would be wood construction.
• Exteriors of the units would be finished in earth tone
colors, complimenting the colors of the existing homes.
• Dormers of the units would be modified to be less
dominant.
Sincerely,
erome J. Banack, President
Timber Lakes Townhomes Association
JJB:gj
cc: Ralph W. Werner, Vice-President
Charles R. Weber, Secretary/Treasurer
•
March 5, 1986
Mr. Bernard J. Rotter
Vice President
The Rottlund Company, Inc.
P.O. Box 383
Osseo, Minnesota 55361
Dear Mr. Rotter:
I am writing this letter to you as agent for the owner of the
townhomes at 8034 and 8046 Timber Lake Drive and as President of
The Townhomes of North Bay Condominium Association, Inc. In
those capacities, I have reviewed the floor plans of the
townhomes which you propose to build in Timber Lakes and I have
also seen the Townhomes that you have constructed in Oal•dale,
( Minnesota. I approve of the floor plans and I encourage you to
build in Timber Lakes. I understand that the exteriors will be
redwood and earthtone colors which I believe will blend well.
with the existing Timber Lakes area developments. I am anxious
to see some development on the proposed development site and I
am excited about the prospect of Rottlund building in our
neighborhood.
If I can be of any service to your company please do not
hesitate to call me at 341-1682. I will be happy to work with
you in my capacity as President of The Townhomes of North Bay
Condominium Association, Inc.
Sincerely,
Steven A. Selinske
- -',.?:'1-,. Vill,!t,'1J,) -4. e;-'47;tigtr#4 1 ' '
\ \ \ 1 . ..;
I
\ fr'.'%‘\ ,
I� t
t I ® x:__.-milt
,.,),
, 'Nf'-,1 11 „(,,i , a - s, al
, 1 N ,_„,
1
1. i r�,y..•.�.tom • 4
1 f \
4.
1 I , `'e 4 .
(: 1. I ::_ •
;1
I .[ ,
MILLER PARK CONCEPT PLAN I•i '�
i
1 t
MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
Monday, June 9, 1986
School Board Meeting Room
7;30 D.M.
IL
A. LAKE PARK, by The Rottlund Company, Inc. Request for Planned Unit
Development Concept Amendment on 16.7 acres, Planned Unit
Development District Review within the RM-6.5 zoning district on
16.7 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 16.7 acres into 102 lots for
construction of 98 townhome units. Location: Southwest quadrant of
County Road #4 and Timber Lakes Drive. A public hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes 2 June 9, 1986
91
Mr. Bill Price, engineer for proponents, reviewed the site design with the
Commission, including site access, landscaping, and architecture.
Planner Enger reviewed the Staff Report of June 6, 1986. He stated that the
previous approval for this property had been for 84 units when the City
originally reviewed the Mitchell Lake Planned Unit Development of 1976.
Staff noted that additional access to the property would be provided in the
future along the south property line, in conjunction with access to future
Miller Park, located south and west of the property. It was also pointed
out that the final details of storm water drainage for the property needed
to be worked out with the City Engineer. Planner Enger stated that the City
Council was currently reviewing an engineering feasibility study regarding
storm water drainage and the "chain of lakes" in Eden Prairie, which would
be impacted by this drainage system, and which would have an affect on the
development of this property. He noted that the Council was expected to act
on the feasibility study some time in July.
Mr. Price explained that the storm water from the site, itself, would be
held on the property in the pond shown. He noted that it would be sealed to
hold the water and, therefore, maintain the amenity to avoid a drying out of
the pond. Gartner asked how the sealing of the pond would take place. Mr.
Price explained that it would be done by one of several methods, including a
polyethelene liner, clay, or imported material from South Dakota which was a
114 natural sealer.
Gartner asked about the 102 lots requested by platting versus the 98 units
proposed for units. Mr. Price stated that the other four lots would be
owned by the Homeowners' Association for this property and maintained as
common space for the entire development.
Anderson asked if there would be a walkway around the entire pond. Mr.
Price stated that it would not be around the entire circumference of the
pond, but would be routed along one side of the pond. Anderson stated that
he was concerned about future maintenance of this area for attractiveness of
the development, since it appeared to be the principle amenity for the
property. Mr. Price stated that the intent was that it be maintained. He
noted that the developers were considering the use of a well for the pond in
order to assure that the water would stay fresh.
Bye stated that she was concerned about the provision of adequate parking
for the development, adding that she concurred with the Staff recommendation
for additional parking on the property. Mr. Price indicated that he felt
this was a matter which could be worked out with the Staff prior to City
Council review. He added that proponents were willing to comply with all of
the Staff recommendations.
Anderson asked if the homeowners of this development would be part of the 7
existing homeowners' association, or form another one. Mr. Bud Rotter,
proponent, responded that the existing association for the homes north of i
1r Timber Lakes Drive would not be part of the association for this
development. He stated that it was likely, however, that the six units 1
existing on the south side of Timber Lakes Drive would be combined in some
manner into one association with the proposed development.
Planning Commission Minutes 3 June 9, 1986
Acting Chairman Hallett asked if it would be possible for the development to
provide for another access to the south at the road to be installed in the
future for access to Miller Park. He stated that he felt another access may
be necessary, considering the number of units in the development.
Dodge stated that she felt additional landscaping would be necessary along
County Road #4. She asked if there was potential for access to the south
for this property in order to alleviate the traffic problem in the near
future. Planner Enger stated that this could be reviewed with the
proponents prior to Council review.
Acting Chairman Hallett stated that he was concerned that the additional
parking spaces be included with the minimum loss of green space possible to
the property. 8ye concurred.
Acting Chairman Hallett asked about storage for snow on the property. Mr.
Price stated that plans were to remove some of the snow by truck from the
site to other locations. Acting Chairman Hallett asked what provisions, if
any, Staff had recommended for the snow storage on the property. Planner
Enger responded that Staff had suggested curbing along driveways and the
road in order to avoid damage to the green areas of the yards by snow
removal activities.
Acting Chairman Hallett asked about the existing evergreens near County Road
#4. Planner Enger stated that those trees were not located on the property,
but on the adjacent property; therefore, they would not be disturbed.
Mr. Ed Nash, 8072 Timber Lakes Drive, expressed concern for the potential
traffic problems resulting from the new development. He stated that he felt
having only one access to the property would create a bad traffic situation
on Timber Lakes Drive. He pointed out that there would be approximately 200
additional cars resulting from this development. Mr. Nash added that he
believed alternative access to County Road #4 should be provided for the
development as soon as possible and asked when the access to the park would
be constructed. Planner Enger responded that the Director of Community
Services, Bob Lambert, was in the process of negotiating for the purchase of
the necessary property for the access and the park at this time. He stated
that Mr. Lambert had indicated that process should be complete by 1988.
Mr. Nash asked about the phasing of the development. Mr. Rotter stated that
the proponents were planning on completing the development within 18 months,
if possible.
Mr. Nash asked about the water quality of Mitchell Lake and the potential
problems which would result with the storm water drainage system in the area
because of this development. He stated that he felt the existing storm
water drainage situation should be dealt with before additional development
was allowed.
Planner Enger stated that, in the past, the City had pumped the overflow
from Round Lake into Mitchell Lake, which had begun to cause problems in
this neighborhood. Currently, the City was pumping the overflow from Round ti
Lake to the east into Purgatory Creek. He noted that the Council would be
considering the storm water drainage study for the area as a public
Planning Commission Minutes 4 June 9, 1986
improvements project at a meeting in the near future. Mr. Nash asked if
this would be more "after the fact" rather than preventive. Planner Enger
stated that it would have been inappropriate to perform any improvements
much sooner, and that the storm water drainage improvements being discussed
were timely, in terms of the level of development of the area.
• Ms. Rita Rove, 7988 Island Road, stated that she was representing the single
family homeowners in the neighborhood. She stated that she concurred with
the concerns regarding traffic and storm water drainage previously
mentioned. She added that she was also concerned about the possibility of
erosion into Mitchell Lake. Ms. Rove asked how long it would take to
implement the storm water drainage improvements once the study was reviewed.
Planner Enger explained that the City Council would be able to choose from
various alternatives, which would include cost estimates, upon their review
of the study. He stated that he felt the timing of this development and the
storm water drainage improvements would be concurrent.
Mr. David Ludvig, 7998 Island Road, member of the Timber Lakes Homeowners'
Association, asked what procedures the City could implement to guarantee
that there would be an access to the south for this development. Planner
Enger explained that the City had several alternatives, the most common of
which was requirement of a performance bond.
Acting Chairman Hallett suggested that it may be necessary that several
units be eliminated from the plan in order to provide for adequate space for
snow storage, access, and green space. He asked if proponents were willing
to consider the elimination of a small number of units, if necessary, prior
to Council review of the item in order to mitigate these concerns. Mr.
Rotter stated that he would be willing to eliminate units in order to
facilitate these matters, if no other alternatives were available. He added
that he was willing to work with Staff in order to accomplish this prior to
Council review.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Bye, to close the public hearing.
Motion carried--6-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Ruebling, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Rottlund Company for Planned Unit-
Devleopment Concept Amendment of 16.7 acres of the Mitchell Lake Planned
Unit Development of 1976 for Lake Park for construction of 98 townhome
units, based on plans dated May 30, 1986, subject to the recommendations of
the Staff Report of June 6, 1986, with the additional requirement that
access to the south property line be provided for connection to the future
public park road access to Miller Park and County Road #4.
: ..
Motion carried--6-0-0
/i•(3
Planning Commission Minutes 5 June 9, 1986
MOTION 3:
Move to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Rottlund.
Company for Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District
Change within the RM-6.5 Zoning District for 16.7 acres known as Lake Park,
for construction of 98 tawnhome units, based on plans dated May 30, 1986,
subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 6, 1986, with
the additional requirement that access to the south property line be
provided for connection to the future public park road access to Miller Park
and County Road #4.
Motion carried--6-0-0
MOTION 4.
Move to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Rottlund
Company for Preliminary Plat of 16.7 acres into 102 lots for construction of
98 townhome units for Lake Park, based on plans dated May 30, 1986, subject
to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 6,:_1986, = with the
additional requirement that access to the south property line be provided
for connection to the future public park road access to Miller Park and
County Road #4.
Motion carried--6-0-0
ill
Or`
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #86-159
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF STENEHJEM ADDITION FOR
KATHLEEN M. STENEHJEM
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Stenehjem Addition for Kathleen M. Stenehfem, dated May
2, 1986, consisting of 3.34 acres into five single family lots, a copy of: which Is .
on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the
Eden Prairie Zoning and.Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein
approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 1st day of July, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
i
1
i
.r
cJ
C C
To whom it may concern:
Kathleen M. Stenehjem has our approval for 5 single family lots
to be known as Stenehjem Addition.
Tom and Donna Heelan
16795 Whittington Walk
Pete and Donna Schulberg
6905 Chatham Way
sio
IS
CD
107-
�V
r)"f,t
P �
P
l(
STAFF REPORT
(
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
HR UGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: June 6, 1986
PROJECT: Stenehjem Addition
LOCATION: North of Craig Drive, east of Duck Lake Road
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER: Kathleen Stenehjem
REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 3.34 acres,
with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals.
2. Preliminary Plat of 3.34 acres into five lots and road
right-of-way.
-.
» E r o N.. `:---` -
Background
ItThis site is currently designated on " �T"1'"'e;.,' 1 -�
the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide ,C„ 2x.,
Plan for Low Density Residential - Jf� .."'R, `tk,
land uses. Surrounding designations �_ ° ,,1 as-
within this area are also Low I, � i
Density Residential. Specific land ;=X �I� r
uses include vacant property zoned ° ,k- -,.
Rural to the north, Hightrails ...." � .7
Estates 2nd Addition zoned R1-13.5 1sy i i s.+r""
to the south, Chatham Woods zoned / 4 It Mc
R1-13.5 to the east, and Woodlawn f k •ROPOSED SITE, ='. ,,. 4 �ksi
Heights zoned R1-9.5 to the west. .1.{,, 11114111 IiIi, .,
The proponent is requesting a zoning )4y+c +,
district change from Rural to RI- rAIIMEMIFH MEIB : R
13.5 for the development of five aPPNVIII
NEI
lots which is consistent with ��: ■ �>r --1
surrounding guide plan designations Maul -
and land use patterns. y "� �^" c
Site Plan PAI""7r. II Bill iP.L_. 1 -
c
The site plan depicts the division 6.111.1JE 1:F/a2 , F
of a 3.34-acre tract into five lots. mi a�si
Lots 2 through 5 will be accessed by • ���--�� - �,p,nli — ..,.,r
the extension of Craig Drive, while I� 1- ! . A\8 -
AREA LOCATION Mni AP.
re..r 1.-1.n.-1--5in. 4.... ... ..��
Stenehjem Addition 2 June 6, 1986
It Lot 1 will be accessed from Duck Lake Road. There is an existing house on Lot 4
while the remainder of the lots will be designed for custom building with
development occuring as the lots are sold.
All the lots meet the requirements of the R1-13.5 zoning district with the exception
of Lot 2. The exception in this case is the frontage on a public road, which on the
preliminary plat, measures 55 feet. The minimum requirement in an R1-13.5 zoning
district is 85 feet. The reason for this request is to allow access into Lot 2
which would otherwise be inaccessible. Lot 2 does meet all the requirements of the
R1-13.5 district with the exception of the 55-foot frontage designed primarily for
use as an access drive into the site and should create no perceivable problems.
Grading
Elevations on this site range from a high of 944 located within the center of the
site adjacent to the cul-de-sac along the front of Lot 5 to a low point of 886 which
is located in the northeast corner of the site. Because of the difference in
elevation of greater than 30 feet, a steep slope review is being done in conjunction
with the preliminary platting and the zoning district change on this piece of
property.
The proposed grading plan shows a series of building pads located on each individual
lot with the proposed grading surrounding these areas. Grading is kept at a minimum
mostly occuring above the 930 contour elevations on Lot 5, Lot 3, and Lot 2. No
grading is proposed for Lot 4 where the existing house is located. Grading on Lot 1
is a little more extensive due to the slopes on the site, but still could be
considered minimal. Cut and fill on this site is also considered minimal with a
maximum of four feet of fill occuring on Lot 1 and a maximum of six feet of cut
occuring on Lot 5.
An on-site inspection has revealed that this site is a heavily wooded site. There
are large caliper inch oaks, sugar maples, and a variety of other trees located
here. In order to completely evaluate the preliminary plat with the proposed
building pad locations and grading, Staff is recommending that a tree inventory be
submitted of all trees larger than twelve caliper inches in size on each of the lots
within the proposed grading limits and housepad locations. The tree inventory is
necessary to evaluate building pad locations and grading in order to save as many
trees as feasible.
Utilities
Water and sanitary sewer services are available to this site. Utilities in this
location include a six-inch water line and an eight-inch sewer line located within
the Craig Drive right-of-way. Connections for these services will be made at this
location and extended to the proposed buildings.
Drainage on these lots will primarily be in a northerly direction down the slope. f.
Pedestrian Systems
The proposed trail system in this area includes a five-foot concrete sidewalk along ? '`
both sides of Duck Lake Road. Staff is recommending that the sidewalk along the
eastern boundary of Duck Lake Road be continued with the construction of Lot 1.
•
Stenehjem Addition 3 June 6, 1986
Preliminary Plat
The preliminary plat depicts a division of a 3.4-acre site into five lots and road
right-of-way. Lot sizes on this property range in size from 13,500 square feet for
Lot 3, which is the minimum required in an R1-13.5 zoning district, to a maximum of
47,800 square feet for Lot 4 where the existing house is located. As previously
mentioned, all the lots meet the requirements of the R1-13.5 zoning district with
the exception of Lot 2 where the minimum street frontage proposed is 55 feet. The
proponent will be required to file an application with the Board of Appeals to
receive a variance from this Code requirement.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the request for rezoning of approximately 3.34
acres from Rural to R1-13.5 and Preliminary Plat of 3.34 acres into five lots and
road right-of-way, based on plans dated May 28, 1986, and subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 6, 1986, and subject to the following
conditions:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Submit a tree inventory which includes all trees, twelve caliper
inch or greater, located on-site which are considered to be within
the construction limits of the proposed project.
41. B. Modify the site plan to include a five-foot concrete sidewalk along
the western portion of Lot 1 adjacent to Duck Lake Trail.
C. Provide plans for review by the Fire Marshal.
2. Prior to Final Plat, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off, erosion control, and utility
plans for review by the City Engineer.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
4. Prior to Grading permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading.
B. Stake the construction limits with erosion control fencing.
5. Receive approval from the Board of Appeals for a minimum street frontage of
55 feet in an R1-13.5 district on Lot 2.
IL
i�l
Planning Commission Minutes 5 June 9, 1986
174
•
,, B. STENEHJEM ADDITION, by Kathleen M. Stenehjem. Request for Zoning
District Change from Rural to R1-13.5, with lot frontage variance to
be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, and Preliminary Plat of 3.34
acres into five single family lots. Location: North of Craig
Drive, east of Duck Lake Road. A public hearing.
Ms. Stenehjem gave a brief review of the proposed site development, adding
that she had no objection to any of the recommendations of the Staff Report
of June 6, 1986.
Planner Uram reviewed the findings and conclusions of the Staff Report,
noting that a variance to the width of one of the lots at the street
frontage would require review by the Board of Appeals.
Gartner asked if shifting of lot lines between Lots 2 and 3 would eliminate
the need for the variance. Planner Uram responded that Staff had reviewed
this alternative, but that it had been rejected because of the reduction in
the amount of buildable area that would result for Lot 3.
Ruebling asked if the existing driveway to Duck Lake Trail would remain.
Ms. Stenehjem stated that it would remain as the access to the existing
house. She added that she was considering private restrictions in order to
maintain the trees along the driveway.
Mr. Michael Anderson, 6423 Craig Drive, asked if the development of the
property would result in any additional assessments to his property.
Planner Enger responded that this typically did not occur in situations like
this; however, if his property were impacted by any assessments, there would
be a public hearing process at the City Council and notification would be
Planning Commission Minutes 6 June 9, 1986
sent to the affected residents. Mr. Anderson suggested that perhaps one lot
could be removed in order to provide for all lots to meet Code requirements.
Mr. William Putnam, 6411 Craig Drive, stated that he did not currently have
"legal" access to his property since the cul-de-sac proposed on Stenehjem
property was to be dedicated to the City for that purpose. He asked when he
would have "legal" access. Ms. Stenehjem stated that it would be available
to him at the time of filing of the final plat.
Mr. Putnam asked what the distance would be between his home and the house
that would be located on the lot closest to him. Planner Enger stated that
the minimum side yard was ten feet, therefore, there would be at least 20
feet between the homes.
Mr. Putnam asked if the wooded areas would remain as is. Ms. Stenehjem
responded that the lots would be sold to custom home builders and that she
was planning to have them save as many trees as possible. She added that
the quality of the homes would be equal to, or greater than, the homes
existing in the area.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Bye, to close the public hearing.
Motion carried--6-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Bye, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Kathleen Stenehjem for Zoning District
Change from Rural to R1-13.5, with a lot frontage variance for one lot to be
reviewed by the Board of Appeals, based on plans dated May 2, 1986, subject
to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 6, 1986.
Motion carried--6-0-0
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Bye, to recommend to the City •
Council approval of the request of Kathleen Stenehjem for Preliminary Plat
of the Stenehjem Addition for Kathleen Stenehjem, with a lot frontage
variance for one lot to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, based on plans
dated May 2, 1986, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated
June 6, 1986.
Motion carried--6-0-0
J3a
I
1 ``I
ik
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #86-160
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EIGHTEEN PARK BUSINESS CENTER
FOR INVESTMENT SERVICES GROUP, INC.
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Eighteen Park Business Center for Investment Services
Group, Inc., dated May 15, 1986, consisting of 2.85 acres into one lot for
construction of a 37,000 square foot office/warehouse, a copy of which is on file at
the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie
Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 1st day of July, 1986.
I
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
•
Ar
MEMO
TO: City Council
FROM: Donald Uram, Assistant Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: June 24, 1986
RE: EIGHTEEN PARK BUSINESS CENTER
In the Staff Report dated June 6, 1986, it was stated that the_ existing
Machine Products building would require a Floor' Area Ratio (FAR) variance.
Based on plans depicting a 5.30-acre site and a building square footage of
82,450, an FAR of 35.7% was calculated. The maximum FAR allowed for a
single-story building in an I-5 zoning district is 30%. Since that time, he
proponent has submitted additional- information revealing that. the4 office
portion of the building is two stories in height. An FAR of 50% is' allowed
per Code for multi-story buildings which applies: in this case. `Becauseof
this, an FAR variance is not required for the Machine Products site.
STAFF REPORT
(
TO: Planning Comnission
FROM: Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
MITI-TOUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: June 6, 1986
PROJECT: Eighteen Park Business Center
LOCATION: West of Washington Avenue, south of Flying Cloud Drive
APPLICANT: Investment Services Group, Inc.
FEE OWNER: Machine Products
REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from I-5 Park to I-2 Park on 2.85
acres.
2. Preliminary Plat of 2.85 acres into one lot.
Background \ ir /7 \�
39-3 --...._-
This site is currently designated on DFC
the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide111
Plan for Industrial land uses. ;
110
Surrounding Guide Plan designations ;7 I '�
to the north, south, and west, are �.
also for Industrial land uses. 54.,\ •
�� 0.
Specific land uses includes Re- �7 ��` ��� o
search, Inc., zoned I-5 Park to the �� y .��� i`� -7 '
north; Starky Laboratories, zoned I- �� �\ A,� I-- PRK
2 Park to the south; Machine \via AW4� «
Products, zoned I-5 Park to the - ,;� A
west; and, Washington Avenue/County _ .���...
I-2 PK ►��;:;!
Road #18 to the east. �� i ' ` 78-21 �ewA- 4 I
The proponent is requesting a zoningj IiI PROPOSED SITE
q 9 l �^ �orr
district change from I-5 Park to I-2 \ to _ ,a_,)
Park for the construction of a 1 1 ' 142,-RK" "3 f4.,,,,,
37,065 square foot office/warehouse �' ;5% . 4,h ��.
building. ia? s460r
Site PI an
79-37,,, Ahom Sp I
kPf I< I-2,'RK 2
The site plan depicts the con- -, InP,RK
struction of a single, 37,065 square ...-4-
foot office/warehouse building on a 1 i i 479-37 '' 1-2' s 78-33
2.85-acre site. A 29.9% Floor Area I1 1-2PRK '... 1-5RRK 1_7 -
+a. I95-84 1-5 BRK
'111 AREA LOCATION MAP
Eighteen Park Business Center 2 June 6, 1986
Ratio (FAR) has been calculated which equals the maximum FAR allowed in an I-2 Park
zoning district of 30%. The proposed building meets the minimum requirements of the
I-2 Park zoning district including front yard setbacks, side yard setbacks, and lot
size.
The proponent has calculated parking requirements based on a spec building which
includes one-third office space, one-third warehouse space, and one-third
manufacturing space. Utilizing five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet for
office, 0.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet for warehouse, and three spaces per
1,000 square feet for manufacturing, a total of 105 parking spaces are required and
provided on the proposed site plan.
Access into the site will be provided by three driveways off Washington Avenue. The
southerly-most driveway is proposed to service both the existing Machine Products
building located to the west of the site, and to act as the primary exit for truck
traffic off the site. The northerly-most driveway is intended for use by trucks as
a one-way drive only and used in conjunction with the southerly-most driveway
provides an efficient loop traffic system.
Grading
Elevations on this site range from a low point of 886, in the front portion of the
site adjacent to Washington Avenue to a high point elevation of 876, which is the
existing berm located within the center portion of the site designed to screen the
parking area of Machine Products. The site slopes in both an easterly and westerly
direction at this point. The site is relatively free of any vegetation and grading
in this area shall not be considered a problem with the exception of the ponding
area. The proposed building has a finished floor elevation of B72 which entails
approximately four feet of cut off the berm and approximately seven feet of fill
within the ponding area. The site is relatively level with two, six-foot berms
located along each side of the center driveway designed to screen parking areas.
Also, the proposed grading plan depicts two ponding areas located on each side of
Center Drive access which will be used for storm water drainage.
Landscape Plan
Based on a single-story building size of 37,065 square feet, a total of 116 caliper
inches of landscape material is required for the site. In reviewing the building
elevations, the proposed building measures in excess of 20 feet, which in
determining caliper inch requirements is considered a two-story building. Because
of that, the total caliper inches on this site must be doubled. With this in mind,
a total of 232 caliper inches of landscape plant material are required. The
proponent's landscape plan includes a total of 169 caliper inches of plant material,
including 17, 14-foot Black Hills spruce and a number of other varieties of plant
materials. The proponent will be required to revise his landscape plan to include
an additional 63 caliper inches of plant material. Staff is recommending that this
plant material be grouped in areas which will help screen the proposed parking
areas. (See Attachment A) In addition, some evergreen trees should be planted to
help screen the overhead loading door on the north side of the building.
One major item of concern in Staff's review of this project, was the location of the
four loading docks and the overhead door along the northern edge of the proposed
building. City Code requires that all parking and loading areas must be screened
from views. In attempting to do this, Staff has discussed the situation with the
Eighteen Park Business Center 3 June 6, 1986
proponent and has come upon a satisfactory solution which is as follows. The
proponent, in his building design, is proposing facebrick around the entire
building, including the loading dock areas. In addition, the landscape plan
includes a series of 17, 14-foot evergreen trees planted 15 foot on center along the
northern property line. This evergreen material will remain as a screen throughout
the year thus helping to screen any trucks which may be parked in the loading dock
area.
Architecture
The proposed building contains 37,065 square feet and measures approximately 260
feet at its maximum length, 175 feet at its maximum width, and is approximately 20
feet in height. Primary building materials include warm rust Endicott facebrick,
light rust glazed masonary units which will be used as an accent band around the
building, and anodized aluminum frames with insulated glass. The building is a
typical office/warehouse building with four loading docks and an overhead door on
the north elevation, with the remaining elevations primarily office in character.
The overhead doors and loading dock doors shall be painted to match the color of the
brick.
The building elevations state that the mechanical equipment screening will be
accomplished with finished metal screens around the mechanical units; however, no
specific plans have been submitted. Staff would recommend that the proponent submit
a mechanical equipment screening plan prior to City Council review.
Utilities
Water and sanitary sewer service are available to this site. Connections for these
facilities will include the extension of an eight-inch water line from the building,
to an existing 12-inch water main located to the southwest of the subject property,
and a connection also of a 10-inch sewer line to an existing 10-inch sewer line
located in the same vicinity. The Fire Marshal is requiring the proponent to add a
fire hydrant in the southwest corner and a F.D. connection in the northeast corner
of the building.
Storm water drainage has been designed to sheet drain across the parking areas to
proposed catch basins which shall discharge into the ponds adjacent to Washington
Avenue. Detailed construction plans for utilities and storm water shall be reviewed
by the City Engineering Department.
Signage and Lighting
Lighting and signage details have not been provided for Staff review at this time.
Details regarding the signage and lighting shall be required prior to City Council
review.
Preliminary Plat
The preliminary plat depicts the division of a 2.84-acre tract into one lot.
Because this property is being separated from a larger tract of land, the
appropriate easements and setbacks must be maintained along the common lot line or
the western property line in this particular case. Because parking is located
within the front yard of the Machine Products building, a 10-foot setback must be
required along each side of the common property line or 20 feet of green space. In
Eighteen Park Business Center 4 June 6, 1986
addition, the Engineering Department may require easements because the entire
property has not been platted and any proposed easements would be required by a
separate instrument.
In reviewing the proposed preliminary plat and the Machine Products site plan, Staff
has identified two items which must be resolved prior to the approval of this
project. These items are the location and number of parking spaces and the FAR of
the Machine Products building. (See Attachment B)
Based upon the proposed subdivision, the Machine Products building will be losing
108 proof-of-parking spaces and 54 built parking spaces. A preliminary design has
shown that these spaces can be picked up to the rear of the existing building;
however, the proponent will be required to submit detailed plans depicting a total
of 205 parking spaces on-site. These plans (grading and site plan) will be required
prior to City Council meeting.
Secondly, utilizing an approximate lot area for the existing building of 5.30 acres
and a building square footage of 82,450, a FAR of 35.7% has been calculated. A
maximum FAR of 30% is allowed in the I-5 zoning district. Because of this, a
representative for Machine Products will be required to submit an application with
the Board of Appeals for a variance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
If the Planning Commission feels that the parking and FAR issues can be resolved
satisfactorily, then Staff would recommend approval of the request for rezoning of
approximately 2.846 acres from I-5 Park to I-2 Park and Preliminary Plat of 2.846
acres into one lot based on plans dated May 28, 1986, subject to the recommendations
of the Staff Report dated June 6, 1986, and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Modify the landscape plan to include an additional 63 caliper inches
of plant material per City Code and grouping them in areas designed
to help screen parking and loading areas.
B. Submit documentation stating that a 5% parking island is to be
achieved within the paved areas on-site. If this is not
accomplished, proponent shall revise plans to depict 5% parking
islands on-site.
C. Submit plans depicting the location of the displaced parking for the
Machine Products building caused by the proposed subdivision.
D. Submit a mechanical equipment screening plan.
E. Submit building material samples and colors for review.
F. Provide plans for review by the Fire Marshal. {;
2. Prior to Final Plat, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed utility, stormwater run-off, and erosion control AI
plans for review by the City Engineering Department.
1 i
Eighteen Park Business Center 5 June 6, 1986
B. Submit detailed storm water run—off and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
B. Provide detailed signage and lighting plans.
4. Prior to Grading permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading.
B. Stake the construction limits with erosion control fencing.
5. Receive approval from the Board of Appeals for a maximum FAR variance.
If the Commission does not feel that these items have been resolved, then the
appropriate action would be either to continue the project or deny.
(
�, I1 111
II II
Ill
+� „----
r � � Al
_ „...,, 4 IF.i.Ailt ___ p \,,,
„i ---lir-_ -..7.-_-_,...- - 01:.,
p_ ..
Yy `1 *�'
J
`', --
Pi- • /f / /
Nr,
I ma 's a1 N ' '1 w•
/ 1 03
•
r � I
+ C
/�-- --•rati-M= /�
1 �� / I ----_�_ �. �� , n ,11 , NM
4 I // jg °'Y Q C�
f S
4» ' I G • Z C
•
` " 1L' ` _ L _ .0
Q
'>
4 OC
Ve-
:F• - i
1 ..• '
...f •,
kr) •.,g. ,. ,..'
a t..,
-.
I JiLL
i. ,,,!.:::, ?
_1
. 7 1 • '7',,3 3 5 § i 5 : •
31I .
1 ,1fli---
..f. i. ........,.......;.. ... I, I I
14 ; :!,:: : ' .:-<.---,,' : ,' •1 I 'I
t' L'ir--::'::'n . - -t-'t• 7 ',.-"I \
..., ,..,
"-----'."'''""'7 .."\' I .1 ..•
1.1 3 i' • i , ;,- .. ,
3' 3 ',•, .. ; ;. i i 3 7 i
7i1 t31 5 2 5: .51.•; '': ."
- • :,
• I 7(7 .."'7""" . .7471 , '^"...•! l' j
" anneal"mafosoulerimilli '
0 I is
Z , . iii II INFIEMEMMII 1
. ;
.. .. c. . , I-, • --„:2«. :07s+Pre
1 1 r--
'-';',1 f; •,::P :;3 \
r r}
;,, :_:.;:o.„..,.. ______, "t,..,..4._Li____::__,...•
1 •.1 , J \
1'-3 a .7
Z ; I
- 4 . .:.
ILL Pi I : nut ,. ,___
7:)1 -.1,- -
r 1. 1, .:.1 •'.1111
:11'1 li e
- i g
5i 4._.;L,!,... .4....., . ., • I II(t
' 'r.4.' gs'4 it;--:"""-„,"•-•." .., 4'')‹.:4 1 4-.j 1' -..-*
;.c\t' ''I!: .`1\4-,4,y :q -." 17:i .1"[',. •' A1/32 . (1)
, 41,;0-3,,, ' L• ....,.....;- , &.211.,.:./4 1. .1.li,l' S.
,14. ',v/.1‘;.! ,-;"'''',. ,)`,!..; P- .;,--",.. I , liN•,....'
,L,f___,.'\‘t, _. q....,...._. . -•-,,".. .. .I,''
CA
-I,A.,T1.14:" - iTtr• i
-+-1 iii\0 :.f:-.--- 70----"Iztv:'ll 1
i :1;\A .• ":*_ -7,•;:'‘ 1 ro F
1-i;.,v,,4,t •. . ,,,/,-;,,,, ,...•
Iii,.--.0 ;-.•„ , ..—,,,,,„.,-.,.•• I.
-4----,-,-,„,,,- -v
I-- I-
I:'." 4•%; --'...- •-•- .---- '... -,Y.//'/et:i'' Z (13
LIJ CI..
tr,-z.r_ __r_•..7..,-..-_-_-_-- -. ---ii,•?...,"4,1 .
I I ::‘1-=;-:='7-'.2 -. --_-___*_-:".//:,('.9 , ,.,.,. c-- ....4=7..--..., /(1
7 1 Z a
:I 1 ..
1 . .,
1..,.- 0
< P-
11 . til
. .. ..-.
Planning Commission Minutes 6 June 9, 1986
t
I
C. EIGHTEEN PARK BUSINESS CENTER, by Investment Services Group, Inc.
Request for Zoning District Change from I-5 Park to I-2 Park on 2.85
acres with Preliminary Plat of 2.85 acres into one lot for
construction of a 37,000 square foot office/warehouse. Location:
West of Washington Avenue, South of Flying Cloud Drive. A public
hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes 7 June 9, 1986
Mr. Tony Feffer, proponent, reviewed the site characteristics and site plan
features with the Commission. Planner Uram reviewed the findings and
recommendations of the Staff Report of June 6, 1986. Planner Uram noted
that an additional condition regarding the provision of adequate space and
location for the Gustafson sign from the adjacent property should be added
to the Staff recommendations. He explained that, upon notification of the
public hearing, it had been pointed out that the sign for the Gustafson use
would likely be obliterated, or forced into a variance situation, if
provision was not made at this time.
Acting Chairman Hallett asked when the City would require that the
additional parking area be constructed. Planner Uram responded that Staff
recommended that it not be built until necessary, and that the parking
spaces were not necessary at this time. Planner Enger pointed out that the
area was gravelled currently, not green space; therefore, there would be no
green space given up at the time of construction of the parking area.
Acting Chairman Hallett asked about the requested variance to be reviewed by
the Board of Appeals for floor area ratio. Planner Enger responded that the
maximum allowable floor area ratio for the I-2 Park District was 30% and
that proponents were requesting 35%. This request was based on the floor
area ratio for both lots involved in the development and considering the
existing and proposed structures. Mr. Feffer stated that he believed that
the floor area ratio for the existing structure was under 30%, but that for
IF the proposed building it would be greater than 30% based on the surveyed
amount of property. He stated that the overall floor area ratio for all the
property would then be 30% by proponents calculations. Staff did not
concur.
Planner Enger stated that Staff would review this with the proponent prior
to Council review in order to determine which figures for lot and structure
area were accurate.
Ruebling asked if the building was 18 ft., or 20 ft., in height, based on
conflicting information. Mr. Feffer stated that the plans had been changed
• to reflect an 18 ft. building height. Ruebling asked if this would have any
affect upon the landscaping requirements for the development. Planner Uram
stated that it would and that the Staff recommendation would be adjusted
accordingly.
Acting Chairman Hallett asked for questions, or comments, from members of
the audience. There were none.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Bye, to close the public hearing. •
Motion carried--6-0-0 s=
f
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Bye, to recommend to the City .,
Council approval of the request of Investments Services Group, Inc., for
Zoning District Change from 1-5 Park to I-2 Park for 2.85 acres for Eighteen
.
'
Planning Commission Minutes 8 June 9, 1986
Park Business Center for construction of a 37,000 sq. ft. office/warehouse,
based on revised plans dated June 6, 1986, subject to the recommendations of
the Staff Report dated June 6, 1986, with the added provision that the site
plan be amended to provide adequate space for the Gustafson sign near the
driveway of the property prior to Council review.
Motion carried--6-0-0
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Bye, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Investments Services Group, Inc., for
Preliminary Plat of 2.85 acres into one lot for Eighteen Park Business
Center for construction of a 37,000 sq. ft. office/warehouse, based on
revised plans dated June 6, 1986, subject to the recommendations of, the
Staff Report dated June 6, 1986, with the added provision that the site plan
be revised to provide adequate space for the Gustafson sign near the
driveway of the property prior to Council review.
Motion carried--6-0-0
V. OLD 8USINESS
in None.
1114 VI. NEW BUSINESS
None.
VII. PLANNER'S REPORT
None.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION TO ADJOURN was made by Anderson, seconded by Ruebling. Acting
Chairman Hallett adjourned the meeting at 9:25 p.m.
DISTRIBUTIONS BY FUND
10 227482.55
3334.34
74804.67
7 41802.26
31 48553.00
33 78826.59
51 7791.20
57 2786.00
73 58558.09
77 168454.97
81 - 94387.85
87 1835.00
90 285.35
$808901.87
JULY 1,1986
592 VOID OUT CHECK 26.00-
IL 299 VOID OUT CHECK 7.50-
26300 VOID OUT CHECK 7.50-
26301 VOID OUT CHECK 6.20-
27255 VOID OUT CHECK 60.00-
27787 VOID OUT CHECK 3029.34-
27825 VOID OUT CHECK 12000.00-
27882 VOID OUT CHECK 53.15-
27906 VOID OUT CHECK 206.3D-
27969 BEER WHOLESALERS INC BEER 6127.06
27970 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 64.30
27971 COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIX 1171.20
27972 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 5352.15
27973 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER 9935.01
27974 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 328.50
27975 MARK VII SALES BEER 20267.88
27976 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO MIX 533.85
27977 REX DISTRIBUTING CO INC BEER 446.25
27978 ROYAL CROWN BEVERAGE CO MIX 92.20
27979 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 16633.03
27980 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC ROCK-STREET DEPT & PARK DEPT 2821.31
27981 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 2758.48
27982 MCI CELLCOM SERVICE 27.37
27983 MPLS STAR & TRIBUNE CO ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER 98.30
27984 LABELLES 3 GALLON COLEMAN JUGS-PLAYGROUNDS 56.91
27985 MPLS AREA CHAPTER REGISTRATION FEE 90.00
dr 86 BRANDON BENZ REFUND-MUNCHKINS 13.00
187 ALEX CARSTEDT REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 11.00
27988 JEAN L CHAFFEE REFUND-ADULT DAY OUTING 6.50
27989 HENRY ESENHUT REFUND-ADULT DAY OUTING 6.50
27990 MARIE ESERHUT REFUND-ADULT DAY OUTING 6.50
27991 LYNN EXAN REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS 20.00
27992 JEFF FORSSERG REFUND-CANOE LESSONS 12.00
27993 HOLLY B HENGL REFUND-ADULT DAY OUTING 6.50
27994 MICHAEL KISSEL REFUND-ARCHERY LESSONS 3.40
27995 TERRI LUCKETT REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS 20.00
27996 JULIE NYE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 40.00
27997 LOUISE O'KEEFE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 20.00
27998 MILDRED E TUCKEY REFUND-ADULT DAY OUTING 6.50
27999 SEMINAR REGISTRATION REGISTRATION-PLANNING DEPT 90.00
28000 JOESEPH KARL DOLEJSI PURCHASE AGREEMENT-HIDDEN GLEN PARK 43100.00
28001 JOANNE LANE REFUND-FITNESS CENTER LESSONS 2.50
28002 AARON MILLER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 7.50
28003 ADAM MILLER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 7,50
28004 SAMUEL MILLER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 6♦70
28005 MINN LITTLE GOPHERS ADS-BASEBALL BROCHURE-COMMUNITY CENTER 55.00
28006 MEG CRISSINGER REFUND-GOLF LESSONS
28007 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 230.05
28008 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH FOR PLAYGROUNDS 60.00
28009 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE CO MIX 36.66
28010 ZACHMAN SROS INC REFUND-LANDSCAPING 4200.00
11 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO WINE 112.20
TWIN CITY WINE CO LIQUOR 3322.97
(12
13 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 299.04
28014 QUALITY WINE CO LIQUOR 2447.90
10557923 ;
/j;
28015 MARK VII SALES WINE 180.32
28016 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 469.77
28017 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 7350.18
''118 EAGLE WINE CO LIQUOR 7108.71
J19 SNDWDRIFTERS SNOCLUB REIMBURSEMENT-STATE SNOWMOBILE TRAILS 624.18
28D2D SOUTHWEST TRAILS REIMBURSEMENT-STATE SNOWMOBILE TRAILS 6913.67
28021 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 1746.33
28022 AT & T COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 171.77
28023 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 102.59
28024 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 206.54
28025 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 211.81
28D26 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER REGISTRATION-CITY MANAGER 96.00
28027 SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES REIMBURSED BY CDBG FUNDS 1835.00
2802E A-A AMERICAN APPLIANCE REPAIR INC REPAIR WINDOW AIR CONDITIONER 30.00
28029 STATE OF MINNESOTA -1% DEPOSIT FOR INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS- 11750.00
CASTLE RIDGE CARE CENTER
2803D NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 26899.07
2B031 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 1488.26
28032 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE MAY 86 SALES TAX 16166.16
28033 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 1/2 OF JUNE SALES TAX 8890.00
28034 TDM BUSHARD-PREMIER RENT A CAR RENTAL OF STATION WAGON-COMMUNITY CENTER 439.00
28D35 CHEEP SKATE ROLLERSKATING-COMMUNITY CENTER 98.00
28036 MINNESOTA ZOO MUNCHKIN TRIP-COMMUNITY CENTER 21.2D
28037 MINNESOTA ZOO PARKING-MUNCHKIN TRIP-COMMUNITY CENTER 5.00
28D38 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH-WATER CARNIVAL 10.00
28D39 IACP REGISTRATION-POLICE DEPT 100.00
28040 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 495.06
28041 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 150.83
42 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK/(V PAYROLL 6/13/86 22676.87
43 COMMISSIONER DF REVENUE PAYROLL 6/13/86 9545.15
44 VOID OUT CHECK 0.00
28045 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS PAYROLL 6/13/86 175.92
28046 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 6/13/86 5073.00
28047 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 6/13/86 10.0D
28048 VOID OUT CHECK 0.0D
28049 R P EBERSBERGER ATTORNEY PAYROLL 6/13/86 172.55
28050 PRAIRIE VIEW ASSOCIATES REFUND-BOND DEPOSIT 82900.00
28051 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG PAYROLL 6/13/86 630.0D
28052 PERA PAYROLL 6/13/86 18631.77
28053 CITY-COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 6/13/86 2907.13
28054 NORWEST BANK HOPKINS PAYROLL 6/13/86 600.00
28055 PERA PAYROLL 6/13/86 63.00
28056 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS PAYROLL 6/13/86 18236.62
28057 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP PAYROLL 6/13/86 760.00
28058 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO JUNE LIFE INSURANCE 662.47
28059 BRIAN BAKER REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS 22.0D
28060 TIMOTHY KEEFE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 8.00
28061 MICHAEL KISSEL REFUND-ARCHERY LESSONS 1.60
28062 CHAD NORDBY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 21.00
28063 LAURIE WENZEL REFUNO-SWIMMING LESSONS 16.00
28064 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH-CITY HALL 57.57
28065 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-BULK MAILING-COMMUNITY CENTER 264.02
28066 EAGLE WINE CO LIQUOR 25B9.33
28067 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 199.79
It,J98324
i
7.% 1
28068 MARK VII SALES WINE 78.40
28069 PAUSTIS & SONS CO WINE 1049.16
28070 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO WINE 474.63
771 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 3184.47
0072 TWIN CITY WINE CO WINE 1283.06
28073 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 460.56
28074 QUALITY WINE CO WINE 730.00
28075 DANA GIBBS PACKET DELIVERIES 52.00
28076 JASON-NORTHCO PROPERTIES JUNE RENT-LIQUOR STORE 4525.82
28077 SQUARE CUT CABINET FOR FRONT LOBBY-PUBLIC SAFETY 275.00
28078 AAA STRIPING SERVICE INC PAINTING SERVICE-STREET DEPT 7964.99
28079 AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS -REBUILT TRANSMISSION/TORQUE CONVERTER/ 537.50
FILTER/ACCUMULATOR SPRING-STREET DEPT
28080 A COMMERCIAL DOOR CO REPAIR STREET GARAGE DOOR 328.08
28081 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 916.I7
28082 AMERICAN EXCELSIOR COMPANY ARCHERY SUPPLIES-CDMMUNITY SERVICES 255.32
28083 MPLS AREA CHAPTER FILM RENTAL-COMMUNITY CENTER 4.00
28084 AMEX RECYCLE TIRES-STREET DEPT 182.00
2B085 MARK J ANDERSON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 42D.00
28086 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC -WARNING SIGNS/TIRE SWING HANGER/POST 988.30
-PROTECTOR PADS-STREET DEPT AND PARK
MAINTENANCE
28087 AQUA ENGINEERING INC -WIRE/CONNECTOR/SEALANT/COUPLERS/ 30.96
POLYPIPE-PARK MAINTENANCE
28088 ARMOR SECURITY INC -SERVICE-16691 VALLEY VIEW ROAD-PARK 71.00
MAINTENANCE
28089 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC BLACKTOP-STREET DEPT 517D.39
28090 PATRICIA BARKER MILEAGE 7.50
091 BARRY AND SEWALL 3 GALLONS RUSTOLEUM-WATER DEPT 91.68
1 192 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC -1 GALLON ALL RUBBER LUBE/OIL FILTERS/ 167.19
FLASHER/BLEEDER SCREWS-STREET DEPT
28093 BBC TOOL SUPPLY INC EAR PLUGS-STREET DEPT 4.40
28094 BENSON OPTICAL BINOCULARS-PUBLIC SAFETY 180.OD
28095 BLACK & VEATCH SERVICE-WATER PLANT EXPANSION 7B826.59
28096 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON APRIL & MAY B6 IMPOUND SERVICE 802.50
28097 RICK BOLINISKI MILEAGE 72.00
28098 BRAUN ENG TESTING INC -SOLIDS ANALYSIS/SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW RD & 3254.05
-SMETANNA/ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY-WATER
DEPT & ENGINEERING DEPT
2B099 BRIGADIER ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS 3RD QTR ALARM SYSTEM-PUBLIC WORKS BLDG 72.00
28100 BRO-TEX INC WIPERS-WATER DEPT 152.70
281D1 BSN CORP TENNIS BALL HOPPERS-COMMUNITY CENTER 163.63
28102 JOHN BULTMAN SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 280.00-
28103 MIKE BURGETT SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 112.00
28104 BSC MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS CONTROLLER FOR BURNER-COMMUNITY CENTER 260.42
28105 CARDOX CORP CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT 2632.49
28106 WALLACE W CARLSON COMPANY SUMMER 1986 BULLETIN 3628.80
28107 CEDAR HILLS GOLF GOLF BALL RENTAL-COMMUNITY CENTER 22.50
28108 CENTURION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC SET UP SQUAD CARS-POLICE DEPT 1880.79
28109 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS REPAIRS/PLUGS-WATER DEPT 574.29
28110 CITICORP INDUSTRIAL CREDIT JULY I9B6 SERVICE 656.81
28111 CLUTCH & U-JOINT BURNSVILLE INC CORE EXCHANGE/BEARING-STREET DEPT 260.15
28112 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER -TRUNK MOUNT/INSTALLATION/ANTENNA/MOBILE 1945.31
RADIO-STREET DEPT & PARKS DEPT
(502961
28113 COMMUNITY EDUCATION -SHAKOPEE SHOWCASE REPRESENTATIVES- 5.00
COMMUNITY SERVICES & SCHOOL DISTRICT #272
8114 CONCRETE RAISING INC MUDJACKING SERVICES-STREET DEPT 5082.00
115 JOHN D CONLEY SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 15.74
0116 THE CONSULTING GROUP MAY 86 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES-POLICE DEPT 100.00
28117 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC MAGNETIC WATER FLOW CHART-FIRE DEPT 99.50
28118 COPY EQUIPMENT INC CLEANER/CORRECTOR/FILM-PUBLIC WORKS 179.43
28119 ED CORAZALLA ARCHERY SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 66.79
28120 COUNTRY CLUB MARKET INC COFFEE/FILTERS-CITY HALL 308.96
28121 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS INC JUNE 86 INSURANCE CONSULTANTS 400.00
28122 CROWN AUTO INC FLOOR MATS/MUD FLAPS-STREET DEPT 86.49
28123 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CO STAMP-POLICE DEPT 18.90
28124 CULLIGAN-MILBERT COMPANY WATER COOLER-LIQUOR STORE 19.99
28125 CURTIS INDUSTRIES -GREASE FITTINGS/SPADE/GLEAM-ALL/8ATTERY 235.97
-CLEANER/POCKET KNIFE/POCKET PEN-
STREET DEPT
28126 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 6263.94
28127 DALCO -8LEACH/FILTERS/POWER SWITCH/MOTOR 398.81
-VACCUUM/POLYBAG-WATER DEPT/PUBLIC SAFETY/
COMMUNITY CENTER
28128 CRAIG W DAWSON MILEAGE 39.00
28129 DAY-TIMERS INC CLOCK-COMMUNITY CENTER 18.65
28130 LYNDA DIEDE SPEEDWRITING CLASS-RECEPTIONIST 80.00
28131 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 151.57
28132 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU SUPPLIES-PUBLIC SAFETY 17.23
28133 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 171.90
28134 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 11.39
28135 DUSTCOATING INC CHLORIDE-STREET DEPT 396.00
c36
EARL'S ART & DRAFTING SUPPLIES IN SPRAY PAINT/FRAME CORE-PLANNING DEPT 52.54
37 THOMAS E EASTMAN SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 1.95
38 EDEN PRAIRIE APPLIANCE LINT FILTER-FIRE DEPT
28139 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE -COMMERCE & INDUSTRY LUNCHEON-CITY 15.85
EMPLOYEES 310.00
28140 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS MAN HOLE RING-SEWER DEPT 92.12
28141 CHRIS ENGER JUNE 86 EXPENSES 165.00
28142 ERCOA INDUSTRIES INC WATER BIKES-COMMUNITY CENTER 1458.00
28143 DON EVE AND SONS HAY-PARK MAINTENANCE 10.50
28144 WALTER S FIELDS FIRE CALLS 369.00
28145 FINLEY BROS ENTERPRISES -SERVICE-BASEBALL FIELD AT EDEN PRAIRIE 5270.00
HIGH SCHOOL
28146 FITNESS ASSOCIATES INC STRESS TEST-FIRE DEPT 314.00
28147 FLOYD SECURITY 3RD QTR 86 SECURITY SYSTEM AGREEMENT 324.00
28148 FOUR STAR 8AR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 503.58'
28149 FOX MCCUE & MURPHY 1985 AUDIT SERVICE 13000.00
28150 G L CONTRACTING INC -SERVICE-8395 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE/MITCHELL 2403.08
-ROAD & FAIRWAY LANE/SHADY OAK ROAD/
VALLEY VIEW & GREEN RIDGE
28151 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC -RADIO/WIRE/FUSES/CONNECTOR/ANTENNAS/ 1884.88 i
-COIL/BATTERY ACCESS/SWITCH-WATER DEPT &
POLICE DEPT •
28152 MARK GOOD SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 28.00 a
28153 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTERS TIRES-STREET DEPT 795.24
28I54 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE -SEXUAL HARRASSMENT WORKSHOPS-CITY 2060.00
EMPLOYEES
1(322500
28155 W W GRAINGER INC VALVE/BEARING/WHEEL-FIRE DEPT 45.70
28156 GRAPHICS CONTROL CORPORATION 24 HR CIRCULAR CHARTS-WATER DEPT 73.26
I(157 GROSS OFFICE SUPPLY CABINET-POLICE DEPT 67.20
58 HALE COMPANY INC TROUBLE SHOOT FUEL SYSTEM-PARK BLDG 310.99
159 HEIDI HALVERSON ARBOR DAY/FEES PD 40.00
28160 MICHAEL W HAMILTON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD I68.00
28161 HANCE SALES & SERVICE FUEL TANK-PARK MAINTENANCE 13.65
28162 JUNE HANSON SUMMER REGISTRATION/FEES PD 42.50
28163 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC MAY B6 SERVICE-ENGINEERING DEPT 1664.60
28164 GREG HEGI SERVICE-ROUND LAKE DOCK/FEES PD 50.00
28165 HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PRO POSTAGE-VOTER REGISTRATIONS 42.32
28166 HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPT OF PROPERTY POSTAGE-VOTER REGISTRATIDNS 42.32
28167 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS FILING FEES-ENGINEERING DEPT 120.00
28168 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT MAY 86 BOOKING FEE 96.31
28169 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL CENTERS 3 TRUNK ORGANIZERS-POLICE DEPT 800.00
28170 EUGENE A HICKOK & ASSOC MAY 86 SERVICES-COMMUNITY SERVICES 183.00
28171 HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC -SERVICE TO INSTALL SHEARFLEX PADS- 193.00
COMMUNITY CENTER
28172 THE HOTSY CORPORATION COUPLER/PLUG-STREET DEPT 32.70
28173 DONNA HYATT SUPPLIES/MILEAGE-PUBLIC SAFETY 30.13
28174 HYDRAULIC SPECIALTY COMPANY -0-RINGS/U-SEAL/OIL/BAR STOCK/CAST IRON/ 309.85
SNAP RING-STREET DEPT
28175 IBM MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 181.00
28176 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #272 -FOOD SERVICE/RENTAL OF GYMS & LOCKERS/ 179B.76
BUS SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER
2B177 INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING SUPPLY INC LIGHTS-WATER DEPT 385.24
2B178 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC TONER-POLICE DEPT 251.15
2B179 CHRIS JESSEN SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 2B.00
80 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC -OFFICE SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT/PARK DEPT & 21.96 - -
ENGINEERING DEPT
28181 KAYE CORPORATION PARTS-PARKS DEPT 7.05
281B2 KEYS WELL DRILLING CO PUMP REPAIRS-WATER TREATMENT PLANT 4461.65
28183 KLUC HEATING CO REFUND-HEATING PERMIT 27.0D
28184 BRADLEY J KNUTSON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 84.00
2B185 KOKESH ATHLETIC SUPPLIES INC BASKETBALLS & NET-COMMUNITY CENTER 95.97
281B6 RON KRUEGER & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE-PARKS DEPT 127.50
281B7 LANCE SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 202.15
2B188 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD EXAMINATION OF TITLE-PUBLIC WORKS 425.00
28189 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD SERVICE APRIL 86-DORENKEMPER LITIGATION 110.00
2B190 LEAGUE OF MN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISS ANNUAL DUES-JULY 1 19B6 TO JUNE 30 19B7 6B.00
28191 LOGIS MAY 86 SERVICE 6964.12
28192 LYMAN LUMBER CO 2 X 4 CONSTRUCTION REDWOOD-PARKS DEPT 13.76
28193 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC -SPLICE PLATE/BEARING/SEAL RING/BEARING 208.20
END CAP-STREET DEPT
28194 MIKE MARUSHIN -PHILLIP SCREWDRIVER/HAND PUNCH/AIR 53.40
HAMMER PUNCH-STREET DEPT
28I95 BARB MATSON AQUA AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD 135.00
28196 MATTS AUTO SERVICE INC TOWING SERVICE-STREET DEPT 171.00
2BI97 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC COOKIES-FORESTRY 4B.24
2BI9B MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT 43.40
28199 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMIS APRIL B6 SAC CHARGES 61132.50
2B200 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMSS MAY B6 SAC CHARGES 105435.00
28201 MID-CENTRAL FIRE INC TEMPOMAX GLOVES & MITTENS-FIRE DEPT 1435.00
1(�C2 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO CONCESSION SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 414.25 f
865383
/ )`1
28203 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP-STREET DEPT 271.09
28204 MIDWEST FEDERAL REFUND-UTILITY BILL 23.25
28205 MPLS ST PAUL METRO AIRPORT COMMIS PROPERTY RENTAL-PARKS DEPT 556.80
(206 MINNESOTA DNR AMENDMENT FEE 30.00
207 MINNESOTA REC 8 PARK ASSN -JOB NOTICE MAY 86/PLAYGROUND WORKSHOP 157.75
REGISTRATIONS
28208 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER 106.65
28209 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC ADS-LIQUOR STORES 75.60
28210 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP JUNE 86 SERVICE 37.75
28211 R E MOONEY 8 ASSOC INC PAINT-WATER DEPT 111.60
28212 MPH INDUSTRIES INC TECHNICAL SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 36.85
28213 MPLS STAR b TRIBUNE CO EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER 126.30
28214 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO ROLLER/BELT/SPACER/BOLTS-PARK MAINTENANCE 212.64
28215 MY CHEESE SHOP SUPPLIES-PUBLIC SAFETY 103.98
28216 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN EMPLOYMENT ADS-CITY HALL 188.14
28217 ARIK NORDBY POSTER DESIGN/SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 60.28
28218 NORTHERN CULVERT OPERATIONS CULVERT-STREET DEPT 52.43
28219 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO INSTALLATION CHARGE-SHADY OAK ROAD 1840.00
28220 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO INSTALLATION CHARGE-#10330 AMSDEN WAY 250.00
28221 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO INSTALLATION CHARGE-ANDERSON LAKE PKWY 10017.6E
28222 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW ROAD 2786.00
28223 OCHS BRICK 8 TILE CO CEMENT-PARK MAINTENANCE 48.00
28224 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC COMPUTER/DISCS/KEYBOARD-FINANCE DEPT 2457.00
28225 BILL OLSON GRAVEL-STREET DEPT 76.50
28226 BILL O'ROURKE SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 280.00
28227 HARRY A ORTLOFF SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 280.00
28228 JAY PEDEKE SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 168.00
28229 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO POP FOR CONCESSION STAND-COMMUNITY CENTER 177.00
28230 T A PERRY ASSOCIATES INC -FILLED SUMP 8 STARTED COOLING TOWER/ 175.50
OE -FIXED BROKEN PIPES ON TOWER-PUBLIC
SAFETY BUILDING
28231 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH FUND 45.10
28232 PIONEER MIDWEST PLUGS-PUBLIC SAFETY 11.93
28233 PITNEY BOWES PRINTPOWDER-COMMUNITY CENTER 96.42
28234 KEITH POKELA VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 117.00
28235 POMMER MFG CO INC -PLAQUES 8 TROPHIES-VOLLEYBALL/BROOMBALL/ 1678.50
RAQUETBALL & BASKETBALL
28236 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN -FILTER KIT/INSTALLATION/CARTRIDGE/OIL/ 91.00
-CLEANER COVER/WIRE-WATER DEPT/PARKS
DEPT 8 PUBLIC SAFETY
28237 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING-PLANNING DEPT 566.57
28238 PRECISION COSMET REFUND-UTILITY BILL 3412.92
28239 PRINT SHACK PRINTS-COMMUNITY CENTER 120.61
28240 PRIOR LAKE AGGRETATE INC GRAVEL-STREET DEPT .
18.60
28241 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC -SERVICES-VALLEY VIEW ROAD AT GOLDEN 2777.90
-TRIANGLE DRIVE/CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
FOR DELL ROAD
28242 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES INC PORTABLE RESTROOMS-PARK MAINTENANCE 3376:15
28243 MITCHELL SCHNEIDER SUPPLIES-PUBLIC SAFETY 10.35
28244 DONALD B SCHWARTZ SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 112.00
28245 STEVEN R SINELL JUNE 86 EXPENSES 171.00 I
28246 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP BRAKE SPRING TOOL-STREET DEPT 15.65
28247 SNAP PRINT-WEST PRINTS-COMMUNITY CENTER 75.74
28248 SNYDER'S DRUG STORES INC SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 10.95
41518
28249 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC -EMPLOYMENT ADS/PRINTING-CITY HALL/PUBLIC 189.00
SAFETY & COMMUNITY CENTER
28250 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC MARCH & MAY 86 LEGAL SERVICE 4439.63
251 SPECIALTY SCREENING NAMEPLATE/LETTERS-PUBLIC SAFETY 111.50
IL 252 SPORTS WORLD SOFTBALLS/SCOREBOOK-COMMUNITY CENTER 68.50
28253 COLLEGE OF ST THOMAS -REGISTRATION FEES-CITY MANAGER & HUMAN 350.00
RESOURCES COORDINATOR
28254 STATE TREASURER APRIL 86 BUILDING SURCHARGE 7000.28
28255 STATE TREASURER MAY 86 BUILDING SURCHARGE 11765.23.
28256 DON STREICHER GUNS -AMMUNITION/FEDERAL SIGNED INTOXILIZER 555.00
MOUTHPIECES-PUBLIC SAFETY
28257 STS CONSULTANTS LTD WELL SURVEY-WATER DEPT 82.75
28258 TARGET 220 TENNIS BALLS/POOL SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CTR 125.2E
28259 TENNESSEE CHEMICAL CO CHEMICALS=WATER DEPT 4616.84
28260 TOTAL TODL SOLO PAPER CUPS & DISPENSER-WATER DEPT 52.52
28261 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS -FINGER PAINT/CHALK/CRAYONS/MASKING TAPE/ 923.41
-SQUEEZE BOTTLES/GLUE/STAPLER/RUBBERBANDS/
-TISSUE PAPER/CONSTRUCTION PAPER/FRAME/
INK/PUZZLES/COIN PURSES-COMMUNITY CENTER
28262 TURF SUPPLY CO -RENDVATOR PRO BLEND GRASS SEED-PARK 708.00
MAINTENANCE
28263 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN-STREET DEPT 37.47
28264 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT 1085.40
28265 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-FIRE DEPT 844.45
28266 UNITED LABORATORIES INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER PLANT 207.56
28267 UNITED STORES BINOCULARS-COMMUNITY CENTER 23.99
28268 ULI-THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE 26 CATALOGS-PLANNING DEPT 82.50
28269 VAN WATERS & ROGERS CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT 984.90
28270 DAVE VITTERA SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 602.OD,
11 '71 VOSS ELECTRIC CO FIRE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT 56.32
/72 "WALLACE & TIERNAN DIVISION WASHER/NUT/PLATE OUTER CLUTCH-WATER DEPT 159.39.
28273 JIM WALTERS PAPERS IPCO COPY PAPER-CITY HALL 269.00
28274 WARMINGTON WOODCOCK & WILLIAMS RENTAL OF SOUND SYSTEM-POLICE DEPT 125.00
28275 WATER PRODUCTS CO -4" 1000 GAL METER 0$2069.D0/8 2" 1000 GAL 11503.90
-METER @$418.00/6 1 1/2 1000 GAL METER @.
$295.00/2 3" 10DO GAL METER AT$1266.00/
-6 1" 1000 GAL METER @$123.00/REPAIR
-LOCATOR/TUBING CUTTER/CUTTER WHEEL/
GENERATOR/5/8-3/4 REMOTE HYDRANT WRENCH
28276 SANDRA F WERTS MILEAGE 56.45 � .
28277 WESTERN CHEMICAL CO CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT 4773.60
28278 WILSON TANNER GRAPHICS -LOGO SHEETS/BRASS PLATE/ENGRAVING- 105.40
COMMUNITY CENTER & POLICE DEPT
28279 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FIRST AID SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 238.90
28280 ZIEGLER TIRE SERVICE CO TIRES-STREET DEPT 306.06
28281 ZIEGLER INC -CARTRIDGE/SEAL/0-RING/GASKET/REPAIRS- 565.55
STREET DEPT
53D1578
$808901.87
/,;;/1
ir •N�''419�6 euter
8750 Black aMaple s E. RDrive
J Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344
941-8444
June 6, 1986
City Manager/Mayor/City Council
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Rd.
Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344
Mr. Julie:
With another election coming soon, I would like to ask the City
Council take action to clearify a few of the requirements which
candidates must fulfill. I am sure that everyone desires a clean
and fair campaign and when it is finished I am very sure no one
at city hall wants to go through a hearing with regard to unfair
campaign practices. In an effort to resolve some of those
potential problems, I would like to ask the council take the
following action:
1) CANCEL RESOLUTION NO. 79-135. Since the basic requirements
of this Resolution are contained in the City Code Sec. 2.04
(Ordinance No. 79-15), and since the city can not restrict the
IL rights of candidates to raise campaign contributions, this
Resolution should be removed prior to the next election in
November 1986.
2) ADOPT A RESOLUTION REQUIRING CANDIDATES ANO OR THEIR
COMMITTEE TO FILE A VERIFIED STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTIONS AND
EXPENDITURES. Eden Prairie is within the intent of the state law
which requires such a filing but not within the letter of the
law. In talking with the Hennepin County Attorneys" office, it
is their opinion that the law would use 1980 census data to
establish our population for the purpose of determining which
statements must be filed by candidates. There are different
requirements for candidates of city offices in cities having a
population of 20,000 or more. Since our special census in 1985
shows our population is far more than 20,000, I feel we meet the
intent of the law and we should require all candidates for '
public office in Eden Prairie to file the statements which would
be required of them by the state law if our 1980 census whould
have been in excess of 20,000. Therefore, I would ask the
council to pass a resolution which will require all candidates
for a city office to file city statements which directly match
the requirements of Chapter 210A (Fair Campaign Practices) for
cities having a population of 20,000 or more. This would be a
city required filing and could expire October 1 , 1992.
ILThank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
1
1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Coun 1
FROM: Carl J. Jullie
City Manager
RE: City Hall Space Needs
As directed by the City Council on May 30, 1986, we have assembled
information regarding the availability and cost of leasing space for
City Hall needs and also our Consultant Architects have reviewed the
feasibility of the Mitchell Road site for construction of a new City
Hall
Mr. Steve Kellogg, our Leasing Consultant from Welsh Construction Co.
as per his letter of June 27, has completed a preliminary review of
twelve potential sites where space could be leased. As Mr. Kellogg
explains, we now recommend that this list be trimmed to six sites and
that the owners be requested to do some detailed space planning as
well as considering a further reduction in the quoted lease rates.
Mr. Kellogg will be present on Tuesday evening to help address any
questions we may have. Assuming the Council chooses to pursue this
leasing option, we would anticipate reporting back to the Council on
August 19, 1986 with a final recommendation.
Mr. Wally Daniels and his association from Setter, Leach and Lind-
strom, Inc. our Consulting Architects have completed a preliminary
design for a new City Hail at the Mitchell Road site immediately
south of the Public Safety building. Their conclusion is that it is
feasible to construct a building on this site and to phase the con-
struction so that the initial building would be 25,000 sq. ft. and j
accommodations would be made for a future addition of 15-20,000 sq.
ft. Unless additional property were acquired, a parking structure
would be needed with the future addition. The enclosed site plan
shows how the initial construction and future addition would work.
Mr. Daniels will be present Tuesday evening to address any questions.
The estimated cost of constructing a 25,000 sq. ft. building at the
Mitchell Road site is $2.5 million. This amount could be financed
through the City's General Fund without the need for a bond election.
City Hall Space, Page 2
The estimated cost impact is 1.1 mills or $27 per year on a $110,000
homestead over the six-year period from 1987 through 1992. The 25,000
square feet, Phase I building could be sufficient for up to ten.years
before expansion would be needed.
Following our discussion on Tuesday evening, the Council may wish to
continue this matter to the August 19th Council meeting and to encourage
public input via letters or phone calls to the Council members or City
Manager.
I
1tolEtasilEs
,
I INC.LI v
IAA
June 27, 1986
Council Members
1 City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
1 RE: Leasing Alternatives
City of Eden Prairie
22,000 Square Foot Space Requirement
ICouncil Members:
Attached herewith is the Welsh Companies analyzation of pertinent leasing
and sales information gathered from proposals submitted by the possible
building candidates. Upon your review, I will be able to answer any
I questions you may have in more detail at the Council meeting on July 1,
1986.
Carl Jullie and I have toured the various projects and have had subsequent
I meetings with regard to the City's leasing one of the projects. Pursuant to
these discussions and based upon price, location and athsetics, it is our
recommendation that we pursue space planning and negotiate further with each '
9 of the following owners:
Number Project Owner
I1 Eden Woods Steiner Koppelman
2 Technology Park Steve Hoyt
3 Valley Gate Sigmund Belle
f 6 Southwest Crossing Vantage Companies
i 8 Creek Edge Center Welsh Companies, Inc.
9 Lakeview Business Center Jerry Portnoy
IUpon your directive to proceed with these above alternatives, we estimate '
that space planning and further negotiations to be concluded within 45 to 55
days.
We look forward to the council meeting on July YI, 1986, at which time we
can discuss the various alternatives in more depth.
iSincerely, t
1 At.- f
Steve R. Kellogr x
Assistant Vice President
j
cc: Carl Jullie '
11200 West 78th Street,Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 (612)944.58101 Real Estate Services,Devetoprnent,Brokerage,Management
•
Prepared By: Steve Kellogg
Welsh Companies, Inc.
(612) 944-5810
IIAverage Average
Operating Average Gross Rate (Usable)
&Taxes Nat Rent Includes Concessions Comments: (amenities,parking, signage, etc.)
II
Years 1-3 $4.60 $7.79 $12.39 New construction, wooded site. High-quality
Years 1-5 $4.97 $8.19 $13.16 of finish. Many windowed offices. Owner
managed-Steiner. Monument in front of building.
IParking: 263 total (3.02 per 1000 sf)
fears 1-3 $4.33 $7.07 $11.40 Parking: (5 per 1000 sf.) Monument sign in
1 Years 1-5 $4.69 $7.32 $12.01 front of building.
II tears 1-3 $4.36 $8.50 $12.86 New construction. Windows two sides, skylights.
tears 1-5 $4.72 $8.10 $12.82 Parking: 185 stalls (3.5 per 1000 sf).
Monument sign at street plus sign on building.
fears 1-3 $5.59 $8.25 $14.67 Not enough space. Two-story 27,000 square foot
fears 1-5 $6.08 $8.25 .$15.19 building. Parking: (5.71 per 1000 sf.) Signage
in common with other tenants.
tears 1-5 $8.73 $11.00 $21.73 (includes $2.00 sf Concourse level lunch and deck area available,
I tears 1-5 $9.24 $11.00 leesholds) 9,741 square feet. Parking: 163 stalls
$20.24 (includes $1.20 sf (4.1 per 1000 sf) Building or Monument signage
leasholds) available.
I tears 1-5 $4.84 $8.48 $13.32 New construction, wooded site, freeway exposure,
high quality finish. 3 sides of windows.
Parking: (4 cars per 1000 sf.) Pylon signage
on I-494.
tears 1-3 $5.87 $13.02 $18.89 New construction, quality interiors, visible
tears 1-5 $6.62 $12.90 $19.52 from Highway 169. Parking: 209 stalls
(4.18 per 1000 sf). Signage on the building.
Fears 1-3 $4.26 $7.33 $11.59 New construction, quality interiors, wooded
'ears 1-5 $4.61 $7.33 $11.94 setting. Parking: (3.5 per 1000 sf.)
Signage on boulevard and on building.
■ ars 1-3.42 $4.29 $8.37 $12.66 New construction. Lake setting.
■ ars 1-5.83 $4.71 $8.17 $12.88 Parking: 200 total (3.64 stalls per 1000 sf).
$15.00 per stall in rent(10 underground for
city). Signage on building.
ears 1-3 $4.21 $7.11 $11.32 Parking: 184 total (2.75 per 1000 sf).
Iears 1-5 $4.56 $7.47 $12.03 Signage on building.
F
I ears 1-3 $7.48 $5.70 ears 1-5 $8.05 $5.87 $13.18 Lake setting. Cafeteria in building.
$13.92 Parking: (5 stalls per 1000 sf.) 30 under-
ground, no charge. Signage available.
Iears 1-3 $6.58 $10.50 $17.08 Lake setting. Cafeteria and underground ,
ears 1-5 $7.10 $10.92 $18.02 parking. Parking: 2 garage stalls free for
7 term of lease. Signage -Monument Available.
LEASE PROPOSAL COMPARISONS
FOR
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
$ Per Sq Pt
Occupancy Estimated 1986 Options& 1st Rights Leasehold •Months Net
Date Lease Term Op.Exp./Taxes Equity/Purchase Allowance Rent Free
11-01-86 or 36 Months 1987 $4.20 Expansion option. No "Turn-Key" 3 Months
01-01-87 60 Months 1988 $4.63 purchase option. No phone or 5 Months '
1989 $4.96 computer wiring
1990 $5.33 50% vinyl
1991 $5.72
11-01-86 or 36 Months 1987 $3.96 Rights of first refusal on $18.00 sf 4 Months
01-01-87 60 Months 1988 $4.36 adjacent space. Purchase 6 Months
1989 $4.68 option available.
1990 $5.04
1991$5.40
11-01-86 or 36 Months 1987 $3.98 Right of first refusal on "Turn-Key" 2 Monthsons
01-01-87 60 Months 1988 $4.39 space. Right of first (assume 50%
1989 $4.71 refusal on sale. open landscaping)
1990 $5.07
1991 $5.44
01-01-87 36 Months 1987 $5.12 As space becomes available, Building 3 Months
60 Months 1988 $5.59 rights of first refusal, Standard 5 Months 1
1989 $6.07 purchase option within first
1990 $6.56 three years of lease.
1991 $7.06
01-01-86 or 36 Months 1987 $8.23 For sale. Expansion 9,741 $5.00 sf None 5
01-01-87 60 Months 1988 $8.73 lower level space and 11,000 ($6.00 too low)
1989 $9.23 not used space.
1990 $9.74
1991 $10.27
11-01-86 or 60 Months 1987 $4.09 Adjacent building expansion. $18.00 sf 10 Months 1
01-01-87 1988 $4.39 No purchase available.
1989 $4.72
1990 $5.08
1991 $5.45
0 11-01-86 or 36 Months 1987 $4.42 Right of first refusal on $12.00 sf 3 Months Y
01-01-87 60 Months 1988 $5.59 2nd floor- 6,344 sf. 5 Months 1
1989 $6.13 Purchase option available.
1990$6.82
1991 $7.33
11-01-86 or 36 Months 1987 $3.88 Right on first refusal on "Turn-Key" 3 Months Y
01-01-87 60 Months 1988 •61 Purchase optio29 3,603 sf of n not space. exceed $10.00 sf)ot to 5 Months Y
1990 $4.95 available.
1991 $5.32 74,
11-01-86 or 41 Months 1987 $3.83 No expansion option. "Turn-Key" 5 Months Yet
01-01-87 70 Months 1988 $4.23 No purchase option 20%vinyl 10 Months Yee
1989 $4.55 available. (lighting lass
1990 $4.89 than standard) ,'.
1991 $5.25 'a
1992 $5.64
p
option on adjacent $20.00 sf 4 Months Y
11-1-86 or 36 Months 19878$4.245 Expansion, j 4 Months Y
01-01-87 60 Months 1988 f4.24 6•�nsagailabet. Purchase
1989 $4.54 op
1990 $4.91
1991 $5.27 3
11-1-86 or 36 Months 1987 $6.02 Right of first refusal. $12.00 sf 15 Mon
tthhsMonhs Y
1.1
01-01-87 60 Months 1988 $6.50 Purchase option available.
1989 $6.98
1990 $7.48 I1991 $8.00
11-01-86 or 36 Months 1987 $6.95 Expansion option on 6th $11.00 sf 6 Months (Gross) Y
01-01-87 60 Months 1988$7.42 floor space. No purchase 10 Months (Gross) Y
1989 $7.91
1990 $8.40
1991 $8.91
111
Dated: June 25, 1986
1 Total Available Useable/ Net Lease Rate
project r:oject Size Square Feet Rentable Factor Per Square Foot
I1. Eden Woods Years 1-9$8.50 10250 Valley View Road 87,000 22,000 Sane -:Years 4-5$9.50
I
2. Technology Park V or VI 52,550 22,000 Sees Years 1-3$7.95
West 76th Street Years 4-5-$8.35
III
I 3. Valley Gate 54,000 22,000 Sass- Years 1-3$9.00
10025 Valley View Road Years 4-5$9.00
1 4. Pheasant Run 27,000 16,000 Approx 6% Years 1-3 89.00
14180 West Highway 5 2 Stories 2nd Floor Years 4-5$9.00
ill
5. AID Buildiinngg 39,741 22,000 Approx 5% Years 1-3$11.00
10700 Prairie Ickes Drive Years 1-5$11.00
6. Southwest Crossing 22,397 22,397 1.8% Years 1-5$10.00
10100 Viking Drive
7. Primetech Center 50,258 2nd - 15,656 1.09296 Year 1$7.00, $12.
Highway 169 4 Stories 3rd - 6,344 Year 2 $13.50
TL - 22,000 Year 3 $14.50
Years 4-5 $13.40
8. Creek Edge Center 77,000 22,000 Sass Years 1-3$8.00
' 7277 Flying Cloud Drive 2 Stories Years 4-5$8.00
I 9. Lakeview Business Center 10901 Valley View Road 50,000 Area 1 12,000 Sees Years 1-9$9.59
Area 2 10,000 Years 4-5',$9.53
(not adjacent)
I
10. MN-111 66,900 22,000 Saxe Years 1-3 88.00
10369 West 70th Street - Years,4-5.-88.00
1 11. Crosstown I 48,300 Ind - 9,000 15% Years- 1-3$8.50
10125 Crosstown Circle 3 Stories 3rd - 13,000 Years 4-5 58.50
I 12. Prairie Lakes Plaza 131,699 4th- 22,634 5% Years 1-3 $12.00
11000 Prairie Lakes Drive 6 Stories -Years 4-5$13.00
1
I
1
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
(Expense and Tax Assumptions)
1. Real Estate Taxes:
A. New Projects - Second Year $1.25 per square foot
Third Year $1.50 per square foot
Fourth &Fifth years at 10% compounded
i B. Office Buildings - Increase $.30 per square foot, per year after
` third year.
2. All Operating Expenses: Increase at 6% compounded.
3. Single Story Operating Expenses for 1987:
ICleaning - $ .65 per square foot
HVAC - $1.00 per square foot
Electric - $ .40 per square foot
1 Total: $2.07 per square foot
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. MINVETONCA r► ,.:.
® BELNAR 4 OR I \1
kl. H B/.1EAIAIq TERIi10E�\
' �I�SCt.AYCROSS YAW ' /IRC
1[1.
IT.b R A nCE ' I/LAND y -
.),..,T., ----;...
Lan
—Ill ..,.. , . 4
'i'_;,'"-- '.. .
.IZIr 4:
LAKE til • ,.
ISt,I,y�� '�� ,
. . iii. ,
�'J „,.4. 691E AYn N '.
'p ii.l by Y . , J
It
-ILL �• is
u Ro CT ® RALE LOWY � .�f
!tA E V WIN VIEW COUR T 403 ty,��Ly - 4
`...OR. 7/.1.1ANITORA RD. r`
sil
" Q a VISTA C. 'Q LA
e.' � • -PENNY NRL'. 7APfY tMr tt
��__� —_ ® i
/EETRATE y. �Ni/
WEST/ATE I �i'.
)1\•.,.:......1
.,,
[ ITV ' W '�.
Cillikll '
r
-�./ " /OEXECU11 DR.
\81.TERREY PRE CT • LET, F}
1
L" ! CITY BMW
�. t WATER AIN'T
yI1O PUBLIC SAFETY :-.....:::.
T.-
TIi6N R72Y - d;'
1 •
1
O•
St • CENTRAL •
%�
MPat y'i i
, ,._ .
, :
c:tra=5°:-6)(1-
cri , ,
p ,4.
) -. SL1.
CR
,it RED [ 41
y / 4
:::::::. ...rocripirl, , , r, A14,..,,,.
�� 1 1_�
cil
. A rr a,4
liiiii_ ,
p �s R R ,�
fa pO
1, ILlO
.040
' -'''' Ili .
1
\ • w
•
yr !, :k1
ear4Nr•s i \\c'l_
eci\jii.F_____.
T D Lo>rc w.
BEN C. LAKE v 4 i.
t * '., _... M ii
l '1:14' 1\;*) ,...-.............._
..7_.L........„ ....04 1/11 '
0 ------- • **1' , ° vlo CC' ••••
3 aw >:r -
•
r� ,
.\ ' e ...
A 9
iiiiir .. .- i‘v.14
IY
Y-TI --7. ENE*W 7e 111 ST ��_.. - ♦
r1 100
lid
1L(ONA ROAD
�� KINGIIIV-€ t'r _ ;
Ii
pigi Tell, ry' 1 `'p:
REGIONAL
CENTER
comma cium., ' V PRAIRIE �ANDERSCM 4::::.'•' 0 ----,7- i'EDEN '' ': .- "
DRIVE K
pp �9 CENTER _ lAllE - .2
NI ROADS CRYSTAL VIEW RD. 5 v - __ ,K
' 1crjj,
J6 & (� .r
, p
i
612 316.874`
1011 Nmollet Ma.
Mrnneeoolos Mmnesola 55403 749'
American Instnule of Arclhnecte
National Society of
Professional Engineers
Setter,Leach&Lindstrom Inc.
Architects Engineers Planners
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY HALL
MITCHELL ROAD SITE
PRELIMINARY BUDGET AND PROBABLE
CONSTRUCTION COSTS -- PHASE 1
June 27, 1986
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION (25,000 SF @ $70.00 per SF) $1,750,000
PARKING/LANDSCAPING (100,000 Parking, 35,000 Landscape) 135,000
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION FEES (Including Architect, Soil
Testing, Site Survey, Misc., SAC/WAC) 1B5,000
INTERIOR FINISH 250,000 CONTINGENCIES (10% of Construction Cost) 188.500
TOTAL $2,508,500`
COSTS ARE 1986 DOLLARS