HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 05/06/1986 AGENDA
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MAY 6, 1986 8:00 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock, and Paul
Redpath
CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to
the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director
John D. Frane, Planning Director Chris
Enger, Director of Community Services
Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works
Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary
Jan Nelson
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
A. Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March s 1986 Page 962
B. Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 25 1986 Page 972
C. Joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting held Tuesday, Page 981
April s 1986
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approve plans and specifications for water plant expansion project Page 983
and authorize bids to be received June 5 1986, Project No.
072 Resolution No. 86-82)
B. Grading permit for Mike Sutton property at S.W. corner of CSAH Page 984
No. 1 (Pioneer Trail) and Bennett Place
C. Special assessment agreement for the construction of Dell Road
between Townline Road and south line of Wyndham Knoll formerly
Hidden Glen East)
D. Receive 100% petition for public improvements -- stream storm Page 985
sewer, sanitary sewer and watermain -- for Wyndham Knoll
Subdivision (formerly Hidden Glen East) adjacent to Dell Road
and authorize preparation of plans and specifications in conjunction
with Dell Road improvements) t_C. 52-097 (Resolution No. 86-B3)
E. Receive feasibility report for sanitary sewer and watermain Page 987
improvements along 8aker Road north of Edenvale Boulevard and set
public hearing for June 3 1986, IC. 52=N471Tesolution No. 86-84)
F. Final Plat approval for Red Rock Heights 3rd Addition (south of Page 988
Village Woods Drive) Resolution No. 86-85
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,May 6, 1986
G. Final Plat approval of Mark Charles 4th Addition ig corner Page 991
Pioneer Trail and Franlo Road Resolution No. 86-86
H. Final Plat approval of Prairie Knoll 2nd Addition (North of Valley Page 994
View Road at Ontario Blvd.) Reso ution No. 86-87
I. Final Plat approval of Wyndham Knoll (formerly Hidden Glen East) Page 997
Resolution No. 86-88
J. Clerk's License List Page 1000
K. EDEN SQUARE, by Commercial Partners, Inc. 2nd Reading of Ordinance Page 1001
#47-85, Amending Ordinance #78-56 within the Commercial Regional
Service District; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Eden Square;
and Adoption of Resolution #86-66, Approving Summary of Ordinance
#47-85 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. 9.59 acres for the
construction of commercial/retail. Location: Northeast quadrant of
the intersection of Highway #169 and Prairie Center Drive. (Ord.
#47-85, Amending Ord. #7B-56; Resolution #86-66, Authorizing Summary
and Publication
L. PRAIRIE VIEW, by Weis Companies, Inc. 2nd Reading of Ordinance #4- Page 1009
86, Zoning District Change from Rural to Commercial-Regional-Service;
Approval of Developer's Agreement for Prairie View; and Adoption of
Resolution #86-45, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance #4-86 and
Drdering Publication of Said Summary. 16+ acres for shopping center.
Location: I-494 and Highway #5 at the intersection of Prairie Center
Drive. (Ord. #4-86, Rezoning; Resolution #86-45, Authorizing Summary
and Publication)
M. Adoption of Amendment to 1985 City Budget Page 1015
N. Finding of No Significant Impact for Eden Place EAW (Resolution No. Page 1017
86-89)
0. A Resolution Proclaiming Mai 18 - 24, 1986 as "Small Business Week" Page 1018
in Eden Prairie (Resolution No. 86-90)
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. DONNAY'S ROUND LAKE ESTATES, by LAD Properties, Inc. Request for Pages 631,
Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment from Low Density 857 & 1019
Residential to Medium Density Residential on 14.71 acres and Planned
Unit Development District Review on 34.92 acres, Zoning District
Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 9.58 acres and from Rural to RM-6.5,
with variances, on 14.71 acres and Preliminary Plat of 34.92 acres
into 69 lots and one outlot. Location: North of Highway #5, south
of Lorence Way and west of Atherton Way. (Resolution #86-48, PUD
Concept Amendment; Ordinance #12-86, PUD District and Rezoning;
Resolution #86-49, Preliminary Plat) Continued Public Hearing
from March 25 and April 15, 1986
B. HIDDEN GLEN 4TH, by Derrick Land Company. Request for Planned Unit Page 1028
Development Concept Amendment Review on 130.25 acres, Planned Unit
Development District Review, with variances on 50.2 acres, with
Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial on 2.10
acres, Rural to RM-2.5 on 10.95 acres, Rural to R1-9.5 on 22.72
acres, Rural to R1-13.5 on 8.13 acres, Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential
on 10.95 acres, and from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,May 6, 1986
Commercial on 3.45 acres, Preliminary Plat of 50.2 acres into 119
lots, one outlot, and road right-of-way. Location: Southeast
quadrant of Highway #101 and Townline Road. (Resolution
#86-78, PUD Concept Amendment; Ordinance #21-86, PUD District
Review and Zoning District Change; Resolution #86-79, Comprehensive
Guide Plan Amendment; Resolution #86-80, Preliminary Plat)
C. HOYT RDBERTS ADDITION PHASE III, by Hoyt Construction. Request for Page 1061
Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 Park on 5.0 acres and
Preliminary Plat of 9.62 acres into 2 lots and road right-of-way for
construction of Phase II, Hoyt Roberts Addition. Location: West of
Mitchell Road on Technology Drive. (Ordinance #86-22, Rezoning;
Resolution #86-81, Preliminary Plat)
D. REFINANCING PLAN OF ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS (Resolution No. 86-91) Page 1071
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 26704 _ 27061 Page 1083
VI. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
VIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
B. Report of City Manager
1. Purchase Agreement for Proposed City Hall Site
•
C. Report of City Attorney
IX. NEW BUSINESS
X. ADJOURNMENT.
I.N.APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MARCH 4, 1986 7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock, and Paul
Redpath
CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to
the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attor-
ney Rick Rosow, Finance Director John D.
Frane, Planning Director Chris Enger,
Director of Community Services Robert
Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene
A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen
Michael
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: All members were present.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following items were added to the Agenda: IX. A. 1. Discussion of
City Manager's Review Document; IX. A. 2. Selective Service Resolution;
and IX P-idcock.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Agenda and
Other Items of Business as amended and published. Motion carried
unanimously.
II. MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 5, 1985, JOINT MEETING WITH BDARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND
APPEALS — --- — —
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Minutes of the
November 5, 1985, Joint Meeting with the Board of Adjustments and Appeals
as published. Motion carried unanimously.
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Tax Forfeited Lands (Resolution No. 86-36)
C. Set Date for Special Cit1 Council Meeting for Tuesda March llt 1986,
at 1:00 p.m., High School Auditorium, to review an ill Report
City Council Minutes -2- March 4, 1986
� I
D. Set Board of Review Meeting for Thursday, May 15, 1986, at 7:00 p.m.
in the School Administration Boardroom
E. Parade Permit for "Project Concern"
F. Final Plat, Eden Lake North (Resolution No. 86-37)
G. 1st Reading Ordinance No. 11-86 changing the number of members on the
Board of Adjustments and-Kppeals rod m five-To-seven
H. PARKWAY OFFICE/SERVICE CENTER, by The Brauer Group, Inc. 2nd Reading
of Ordinance No. 40-85 and 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 43-85.
rezoning from Rural to Office on 0.92 acres and rezoning from Rural to
Neighborhood Commercial on 2.75 acres, respectively; approval of
Developer's Agreement for Parkway Office/Service Center; and adoption
of Resolution No. 86-25 authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 40-85 and
Resolution No. 86-38 authorizing Summary of Ordinance 43-85, and
ordering publication of said summaries. 3.67 acres into two lots.
Location: northeast corner of Anderson Lakes Parkway and Highway
#169. (Ordinance No. 40-85 and Ordinance No. 43-85, rezoning;
Resolution No. 86-25 and Resolution No. 86-38 - authorizing Summaries
and Publication)
I. EDEN LAKE NORTH, by Commercial Excavating, Inc. 2nd Reading of
Ordinance No. 2-86, Zoning District change from Rural to R1-13.5;
approval of Developer's Agreement for Eden Lake North; and adoption of
Resolution No. 36-34, approving Summary of Ordinance No. 2-86 and
authorizing publication of said Summary. Location: Franlo Road and
Preserve Boulevard. (Ordinance No. 2-86, rezoning and Resolution No.
86-34, authorizing Summary and Publication)
J. AMOCO OIL COMPANY, by Amoco Oil Company. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No.
3-86, Zoning District change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial for
1.4 acres; approval of Developer's Agreement for Amoco Oil Company;
and Adoption of Resolution No. 86-26, approving Summary of Ordinance
No. 3-B6 and ordering publication of Said Summary. 1.4 acres for
self-serve gasoline station, convenience store, and car wash.
Location: southeast quadrant of Highway #169 and Anderson Lakes
Parkway. (Ordinance No. 3-86, rezoning and Resolution No. 86-26,
authorizing Summary and Publication)
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve items A - J on
the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. RED ROCK HEIGHTS 3RD ADDITION by Jerry Halmrast and Bill Gilk.
R-equest or Zoning District change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 6.4 acres,
with shoreland variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, and
City Council Minutes -3- March 4, 1986
preliminary plat of 14 acres into 7 lots and 3 outlots. Location:
southeast quadrant of Village Woods Drive and View Lane. (Ordinance
No. 7-86 - rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and Resolution No. 86-27 -
preliminary plat) - continued from February 18, 1986
City Manager Jullie stated this meeting had been continued from the
Council's February 18, 1986, Meeting with the major unresolved issue
being the trail connection along Red Rock Lake.
Director of Community Services Lambert reviewed the options considered
by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission at its meeting
on March 3, 1986, and as outlined in Lambert's Memorandum dated
February 27, 1986. Lambert said the Commission had voted to recommend
the stairway alternative which is preferable to terminating the trail.
Peterson asked if there were any liability concerns for the City if
this stairway is not maintained in the winter. City Attorney Rosow
said there is some liability and then he reviewed similar situations
within the City of Minneapolis.
Pidcock said the trail is presently in bad shape.
Bill Gilk, proponent, thanked the Council and said he appreciated the
help he had received in moving this request through so smoothly.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to close the Public
Hearing and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 7-86. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt Resolution No.
86-27, approving the preliminary plat of Red Rock Heights 3rd Addition
for Jerry Halmrast and Bill Gilk. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to direct Staff to
prepare a Developers Agreement per Staff and Commission recom-
mendations. Motion carried unanimously.
B. CARDARELLE III AMENDMENT by Frank R. Cardarelle. Request for Zoning
District change from Office to C-Regional-Service on one acre for
exisiting building. Location: northwest quadrant of Regional Center
Road and Eden Road. (Ordinance No. 8-86 - rezoning from Office to C-
Regional-Service) - continued from February 18, 1986
City Ilanager Jullie noted this Public Hearing was continued form
February 18, 1986, at which time the Council directed Staff to meet
with Cardarelle to explore reducing the precentage of building space
which would be devoted to commercial purposes.
-1Vq
City Council Minutes -4- March 4, 1986
Planning Director Enger reviewed the discussions which had been held
with Cardarelle.
Bentley said he would like to be consistent and retain this as an
office use.
Pidcock asked City Attorney Rosow if restrictive covenants should be
placed on the property. Rosow said the only way to limit the use
within the building is via restrictive covenants. Pidcock asked if
that would not be interfering with the rights of the property owner.
Rosow said if the owner puts on the covenants it then becomes the
owner's act; the Council is not under any obligation to rezone the
property.
Cardarelle said he would like to put on restrictive covenants but have
them apply only to the building while it is in his ownership or with
the consent of the City Council. Rosow said restrictive covenants can
be set up rather specifically and/or for a specific period of time.
Bentley said he thought this was an issue concerning precedents. He
said the Council had approve the office use which was justified on
•4hat site. He said he would hate to see the Council establish some
precedent which would jeopardize uses in this area.
NOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the Public
Hearing and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 8-86. Motion failed
with Anderson, Bentley, and Peterson voting "no".
MOTION: Bentley moved to direct Staff to prepare a Resolution No
Denial with Findings regarding the request for rezoning. Motion died
for lack of a second.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to continue action on
this item to the March 25, 1986, Meeting of the City Council. Motion
carried with Bentley voting "no".
C. ALPINE VILLAGE by Herlitz Construction. Request for rezoning from R1-
22 to R1-13.5 for 8.23 acres and preliminary plat of 8.23 acres into
17 lots. Location: east of Alpine Trail, south of Chicago,
Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad. (Ordinance No. 6-86 -
rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 and Resolution No. 86-23 - preliminary
plat) - continued from February 4, 1986
City Manager Jul lie stated this Public Hearing was continued from the
Council's February 4, 1986, Meeting, at which time the major items to
be resolved were the site grading plan, provision for sewer, and
possible trail connection to the Purgatory Creek floodplain.
City Council Minutes -5- March 4, 1986
Director of Community Services Lambert reviewed the action taken by
the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission at its meeting
last evening including approval of the revised grading plan. lambert
stated the sewer issue is to be resolved by an agreement between the
developer and the owner of the affected adjacent property. The trail
connection to the floodplain would appear more appropriate with
development of property south of this proposed development.
Anderson stated a trailway should be proposed so residents can get to
a park particularly since this is a long cul-de-sac. Lambert said the
easiest way to resolve this would be to put through Hillcrest Court to
Edenvale Boulevard; a pedestrian crossing could be included with that.
Anderson said he thought a trail connection was pertinent to
development of this area. Planning Director Enger said the property
to the immediate east of this is developable. At the time the
property is developed a crossing and connection might be considered.
Anderson said he thought the City should have a plan in place for a
way for the residents in this area to get to a park.
Charles Habiger, Herlitz Construction, stated the property owner to
the east has no intention to sell the property at the present time.
Dwight Harvey, 16190 Alpine Way, noted that the residents of this
neighbohood use Round Lake Park which is a half mile away.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the Public
Hearing and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 6-86. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt Resolution No.
86-23, approving the preliminary plat of Alpine Village for Herliz
Construction. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to direct Staff to
explore a crossing in the general area of Hillcrest Court and to come
back to the Council with a recommendation in a month.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to direct Staff to
prepare a Developer's Agreement per Commission and Staff recom-
mendations. notion carried unanimously.
D. DOUGLAS CORPORATION HEADQUARTERS by Opus Corporation. Request for
Planned Unit Tevelopment Concept Review on 95+ acres of land for
office headquarters, manufacturing and distribution campus. Location:
Highway #169 and Anderson Lakes Parkway. (Resolution No. 86-35 -
Planned Unit Development Concept)
City Council Minutes -6- ?March 4, 1986
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been
published and property owners in the project vicihity had been
notified. Jullie noted there had been a significant late development
in respect to this property and there would be a departure from the
usual hearing format.
Arlyn Grussing, Director of Planning and Development for Douglas
Corporation, asked for a 30-day continuation to allow time for the
School District to review this property as a possible site for a
middle school. Grussing stated this site had been purchased by the
Douglas Corporation as the site for their corporate headquarters.
Fred Hoisington, representing the School District, stated 30 days
might not be long enough; 45 days would be preferable to complete
their study.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pidcock, to continue this Public
Hearing to the April 1, 1986, Meeting of the City Council with the
likelihood of a 15-day extension. Motion carried unanimously.
E. FSI OFFICE BUILDING by Meyer, Scherer & Rockcastle, Ltd. Request for
Zoning Amendment within Office District on 1.6 acres of land.
Location: north of Highway #169, east of City West Parkway.
(Ordinance No. 10-86, amending Ordinance No. 39-83)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been
published and property owners within the project vicinity had been
notified.
Jim Larson, architect for the proponent, addressed the proposal.
Planning Director Enger stated the Planning Commission had reviewed
this request at its meeting on February 10, 1986, at which time it
voted to recommend approval subject to the recommendations included in
the Staff Report of February 7, 1986.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the Public
Hearing and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance llo. 10-86 amending
Ordinance No. 39-83. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to direct Staff to
prepare a Developer's Agreement per Staff and Commission recom-
mendations. (lotion carried unanimously.
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 25702 - 25884
NOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Payment of
Claims 1los. 25702 - 25884. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Pidock,
Redpath, and Peterson voted "aye". ?lotion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes -7- March 4, 1986
VI. APPOINTMENTS
A. Building Code Board of Appeals - two representatives; one for a 3-year
term and one for a 1-year term
The names of Bruce Long and Marcia Kolb were placed in nomination.
MMOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley, to appoint Marcia Kolb to
a three-year term and Bruce Long to a one-year term on the Building
Code Board of Appeals. The terms are to begin immediately (3-1-86 is
the date to be used.) Motion carried unanimously.
B. Hennepin County Block Grant Citizens Advisory Board - appointment of
one representative for an indefinite term, commencing immediately.
It was noted that "Pinky" Bramwell and Jacqueline Tornoe had expressed
an interest in serving on the Hennepin County Block Grant Citizens
Advisory Board.
The name of "Pinky" Bramwell was placed in nomination.
NOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to close nominations and
to appoint "Pinky" Bramwell to the Hennepin County Block grant
Citizens Advisory Board for an indefinite term, commencing
immediately. Motion carried unanimously.
Pidcock expressed displeasure with the fact those who were not appointed
to various Boards and Commissions were not called the morning after the
appointments were made.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Peterson, to direct Staff to call
those who were not appointed as well as those who were appointed as soon
as possible to announce the results. Motion failed with Anderson, Bentley
and Redpath voting "no".
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
There were none.
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
There were none.
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Councilmembers
City Council Minutes -8- March 4, 1986
1. Discussion of Evaluation Forms
Peterson stated City Manager Jullie had received an overall-
average score of 3.34 with 4.0 being the highest which could be
achieved. Peterson then reviewed the Evaluation Forms on a
section-by-section basis and then turned the forms over to Jullie
for his review.
The consensus was that the Manager should avail himself of
opportunities for continuing education in the area of management.
City Manager Jullie thanked the Council and said he would be more
than willing to accept the Council's offer for further education
and looked forward to doing so.
2. Selective Service Resolution
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to direct Staff to
prepare a resolution regarding the selective service for the
Council to consider at its meeting on March 25, 1986. Motion
carried unanimously.
3. Pidcock - noted a letter to Councilmembers from Jerry Kingrey in
which he voiced his unhappiness at not being notified that he had
not been reappointed to the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
Commission. Pidcock said she would like to have candidates
notified the next day as to the results.
- said she would like to see some organized form or means
to thank commission members. It was noted that this is usually
done each year via the City Award's Dinner which is held in late
April or early May.
B. Report of City Manager
1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment - Designation of Year 2000 MUSA
Line (Resolution No. 86-39)
City Manager Jullie noted that as part of the Metropolitan Council
Sewer Facility Agreement for the Lake Ann Interceptor, the City
needs to designate its Year I990 MUSA Line as its Year 2000 MUSA
Line, but the Metropolitan Council has incorrectly identified it
as a Year 1990 Line for some period of time. In accordance with
these requirements of the Metropolitan Council, the Comprehensive
Guide Plan has been amended and these changes are contained in the
Council Packet.
Planning Director Enger said the Planning Commission, as required
by law, had reviewed this at a Public Hearing at its meeting on
February 10, 1986. Enger spoke to his memorandum dated February
7, 1986, and other materials included in the Council Packet in
which this issue was addressed.
7(.1)
City Council Minutes -9- March 4, 1986
Bentley expressed concern about the maximum sewage flow proposed
by the Metropolitan Council in a letter to Planning Director Enger
dated February 24, 1986. Jullie noted that a number of meetings
had been held with the Metropolitan Council and the Waste Control
Commission to develop what is being proposed and with the idea
that things must remain flexible. Ray Odie, Metropolitan Waste
Control Commission (MWCC), stated the MWCC is an agency of the
Metropolitan Council and it carries out the Metropolitan Council's
directives. He stated the MUSA Line is determined by the Met
Council. 0die said it is up to the Metropolitan Council to
determine the number of households and residents within a given
area and then it is up to the MCC to accommodate the flow in that
area. He said there is flexibility built into the numbers.
William Marshall, 17591 Pioneer Trail, noted a letter dated
February 7, 1986, which was included in the Council Packet. He
said he concurs with the statements made by Planning Director
Enger and agrees that supply and demand should determine use. He
said he believes the MUSA Line is really creating leapfrog zoning,
a case in point is the Lake Riley area of Chanhassen.
Director of Public Works Dietz referred to a 1969 Report and
reviewed the development of the MUSA Line since that time.
Spencer G. Kluegel, attorney for Beverly Bollig, Duane Jacques,
and Evelyn Jacques, said he would urge the City Council to pursue
Enger's request for the additional 220 acres to be included in the
Metropolitan Council's review process. (See Enger's letter of
February 13, 1980, to Ms. Pat Pahl, Planner, Metropolitan Council
for details.) Kluegel stated that easements are going to be
requested and the easements for the Lake Ann Interceptor go right
through the property of his clients. He added that he believes
the MUSA Line should follow property lines rather than bisect
them. Kluegel said a condition might be that the I1USA Line would
be moved and the easements for the sewer would be granted free of
charge.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution
No. 86-39, amending the Comprehensive Municipal Plan relative to
the MUSA Line, Year 20D0. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to direct Staff to
proceed with the 90-day procedure requesting that an additional
220 acres be placed inside the MUSA Line. Motion carried
unanimously.
2. Metropolitan Council Sewer Facility Agreement
MOTION: Bentley roved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Sewer
Facility Agreement which would allow construction of the Lake Ann
Metropolitan Interceptor. Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes -10- March 4, 1986
C. Report of City Attorney
There was no report.
D. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Unauthorized Motorized Vehicles Use of Parks and Trails
Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to his memorandum of
February 24, 1986, in which this matter was addressed. Lambert
noted the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission had
moved to appoint a sub-committee to study this issue. This sub-
committee will meet in late March to come up with recommendations
which then can be put in place before the next snow season. Lt.
Jim Clarke is also involved with this sub-committee.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to _accept the
recommendation of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
Commission and to direct Public Safety to try to enforce the
City's existing ordinances pertaining to motorized vehicles.
Motion carried unanimously.
2. Riley Lake Park Safety Conditions
Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to his memorandum of
February 25, 1986, in which this matter was addressed.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to accept the
recommendation of Staff and to request Hennepin County post County
Road 1 as emergency parking only easterly from Riley Lake Road to
Dell Road and westerly from Riley Lake Road to Crestwood Terrace
which would encourage users of the Park to use only those areas
designated for parking. Motion carried unanimously.
X. NEW BUSINESS
Mayor Peterson reminded Councilmembers of the special meeting scheduled
for 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, March 11, 1986, at which time the Landfill Report
will be presented.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to appoint Councilmember
Redpath as the official City Council Historian. Motion carried
unanimously.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to adjourn the meeting at
10:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
91
unAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MARCH 25, 1986 7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock, and Paul
Redpath
CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to
the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attor-
ney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D.
Frane, Planning Director Chris Enger,
Director of Community Services Robert
Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene
A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen
Michael
PLEOGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Anderson and Pidcock were absent.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA ANO OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following items were deleted from the Agenda: IV. I. Flenard's
Ex ansion; IV. J. Flying Cloud Office Buildin ; IV. K. Th—e. l arm;Tel.
oFl o ain7ap V.. A. Cardarelle TIT men ment;—V: B.Donnay' undTake
sl• fates; V.T. -7lympic�f flTs—Tt1T ddition; and—V.—D. Touch o —Class
Interiors. — —— — — —
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Agenda and
Other Items of Business as amended and published. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to continue action on items
IV. I. Menard's Expansion; IV. J. Flying Cloud Office Building; IV. K. The
farm and IV. L. Flood Plain Map tdApril 1, 1986. J•otion came
unanimously. —
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to continue action on items
V. A. Cardarelle III Amendment; V. B. Oonnay's Round Lake Estates; V. C.
Olympic Hills 7th Addition; and V D. Touch of Class Interiors to the
April 15, 1986, ting oI—fhe City Council-JTotion carried unanimously.
II. PRESENTATION BY LARRY OPPOLD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN
ST-WVCT-STOUNCT1-1Fansportat on Project and Other—ftems
Larry Oppold, Executive Director of South Hennepin Human Services Council,
reviewed the goals of the South Hennepin Human Services Council and gave
an overview of the Council's activities.
r.Y?
City Council Minutes -2- March 25, 1986
III. MINUTES
A. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, October 15, 1985
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Minutes of
the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, October 15, 1985, as published.
Motion carried unanimously.
B. Special Joint City Council/Watershed Districts Meeting_held Tuesday,
December85
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Minutes of
the Special Joint City Council/Watershed Districts' fleeting held
Tuesday, December 3, 1985, as published. Motion carried unanimously.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Autumn Woods Special Assessment Agreement
C. Cooperative Signal Agreement with Fin/DOT (Resolution No. 86-51)
D. Revocation and Redesignation of CSAH 1 (Resolution No. 86-52)
E. FlWCC Permit for solid waste facility at S.E. corner of Townline Road
and Indian Ch eT Road (Resolution 1i 8b-5�)
F. Contract approval for review of BFI "Remedial Investigation"
G. Final plat approval for Crossroads Center (Resolution No. 86-54)
H. Final plat approval for Anderson Lakes Commercial Center 2nd Addition
(Resolution No. 86-55)
I. MENARD'S EXPANSION by Menard's, Inc. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 46-
85, Zoning District Amendment within the Commercial Regional Service
District; approval of Developer's Agreement for Menards; and adoption
of Resolution No. 86-43, authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 46-85
and ordering publication of Said Summary. Location: Menard's
Building, adjacent to Plaza Drive. (Ordinance No. 46-85, rezoning and
Resolution Flo. 86-43 - authorizing Summary and Publication) -
continued to April 1, 1986.
J. FLYING CLOUD OFFICE BUILDING by Oakwood Builders. 2nd Reading of
Ordinance No. 1-86, zoning district change from Rural to I-2 Park;
approval of Developer's Agreement for Flying Cloud Office Building;
City Council Minutes -3- March 25, 1986
and adoption of Resolution No. 86-44, authorizing Summary of Ordinance
No. 1-86 and ordering publication of Said Summary. Location: south
of Pioneer Trail, east of Highway #169. (Ordinance No. 1-86 -
rezoning and Resolution No. 86-44 - authorizing Summary and
Publication) - continued to April 1, 1986.
K. THE FARM by Countryside Investments. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 5-
86, zoning district change from Rural to R1-13.5; approval of
Developer's Agreement for The Farm; and adoption of Resolution No. 86-
46, authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 5-86 and ordering publication
of Said Summary. Location: north of Duck Lake Trail, east of King of
Glory Church. (Ordinance No. 5-86 - rezoning and Resolution No. 86-46
- authorizing Summary and Publication) - continued to April 1, 1986
L. FLOOD PLAIN 11AP - 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 37-85, adopting Federal
insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for Eden Prairie as part of Chapter 11, City
Code - continued to April 1, 1986
M. Resolution No. 86-40 supporting local outdoor recreation funding
N. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 11-86 changing the number of members on
tt a Board of Adjustments aniflinpeals 1•rom five to seven
0. Reappointment of four members to the Board of Adjustments and Appeals
- one for one-year term and three for three-year terms
P. 1esolution No. 86-42 declaring April 1986 as "Registration Awareness
Month"
Q. Receive petition for sanitary sewer and watermain improvements to
serve area along east side of Baker Road, north of Edenvale Boulevard
and authorize pLeppa��ration of—a— e�asbi i7ty TWport, LC. 52-094
(rsolution No. 86-56)
R. Authorize fencing for softball fields at Round Lake Park
S. 1987 LAWCON Application
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve items A - H and M
- S on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CARDARELLE III AMENDMENT by Frank R. Cardarelle. Request for Zoning
District change from llfice to C-Regional-Service on one acre for
existing building. Location: northwest quadrant of Regional Center
Road and Eden Road. (Ordinance No. 8-86 - rezoning) - continued from
February 18 and March 14, 1986 Meetings. - Continued to April 15,
1986.
City Council Minutes -4- March 25, 1986
B. DONNAY'S ROUND LAKE ESTATES by LAD Properties, Inc. Request for
Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment from ' Low Density
Residential to Medium Density Residential on 14.71 acres and Planned
Unit Development District Review on 34.92 acres, Zoning District
change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 9.58 acres and from Rural to RM-6.5,
with variances, on 14.71 acres and preliminary plat of 34.92 acres,
into 69 lots and one outlot. Location: north of Highway #5, south of
Lorence Way and west of Atherton Way. (Resolution No. 86-48 - PUD
Concept Amendment, Ordinance No. 12-86 - PUD District and rezoning,
and Resolution No. 86-49 - preliminary plat) - Continued to April 15,
1986.
C. OLYMPIC HILLS 7TH ADDITION by Olympic Hills Land Corporation. Request
TOT—Toning District change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.05 acres for
construction of three single family homes. Location: 10602, 10632,
10662 Mount Curve Road. (Ordinance No. 13-86, rezoning) - Continued
to April I5, 1986.
D. TOUCH OF CLASS INTERIORS by Kate and Craig Halverson. Request for
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Denisty Residential to
Office, and Zoning District change from Rural to Office for an
interior design studio. Location: southwest quadrant of County Roads
#1 and #18. (Resolution No. 86-5D - Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment and Ordinance No. 14-86 - rezoning) - Continued to April
15, 1986.
E. Street Name Change West 78th Street (West of TH 169 to Prairie Center
UFive)to Technology Drive (Ordinance No. 15-86)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been
published and the six affected property owners had been notified.
Director of Public Works Dietz spoke to the reasons for the change and
addressed the public safety issue. Dietz noted the letter from Foto
Mark which was included in the Council Packet.
Bentley said part of the problem was the fact that West 78th Street
was originally Highway 5.
Dan Kleinpaste, Director of Operations, American Baptist Homes, stated
it will cost his company $3,000 to change its letterhead and other
items. He said they have a five- to seven-year stockpile of brochures
with their West 78th Street address on them.
Redpath asked if the change could be structured over a period of time.
Dietz said it could be done so the change is effective in six months
which would allow those affected to have a longer time to make the
necessary changes. Bentley said that any excuse a company has to send
its clients a mailing helps to keep the name of that business in the
forefront.
City Council Minutes -5- March 25, 1986
• MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public
Hearing and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 15-86 with the
provision that this is to become effective on October 1, 1986. Motion
carried unanimously.
F. Vacation of Grier Lane (Resolution No. 86-57)
City Manager Jullie said notice of this Public Hearing was published
and owners of the five affected properties were notified.
Director of Public Works Dietz stated this is largely a housekeeping
item.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt Resolution No.
86-57, vacating of part of Grier Land and adjoining drainage and
utility easements in Darkenwald 1st Addition. Motion carried
unanimously.
G. YEAR XII PROPOSED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had been
published.
Planning Director Enger noted Assistant Planner David Lindahl's
memorandum dated March 20, 1986, in which this matter was addressed.
Redpath asked how the word gets out that the City has funds available
for rehabilitation. He said he would like to see the amount raised
from $15,OD0 to $25,000.
Grace Norris, Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association, thanked the
Council for its support and said there is a continuing need in Eden
Prairie for the funds allocated.
Larry Oppold, Director of South Hennepin Human Services Council, said
his agency appreciates the support given by the City to the H.O.M.E.
program.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public
Hearing and to approve the Proposed Year XII Community Oevelopment
Block Grant (CDBG) Program as follows: Home and Outside Maintenance
for the Elderly (H.O.M.E.) Program, $2031; Greater Minneapolis Day
Care Association (GMDCA), $6023; Housing Rehabilitation, $25,000' with
the remaining $20,645 to be re-allocated to other participating
Hennepin County communities (Eden Prairie will not be penalized for
not utilizing the funds). Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes -6- March 25, 1986
VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 25885 - 26266
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Payment of
Claims Nos. 25865 - 26266. Roll call vote: Bentley, Redpath and Peterson
voted "aye". Motion carried unanimously.
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
City Manager Jullie noted the Council had suggested some time ago that
Staff look into employing a firm which would review the City's risk
management position. He called attention to materials included in the
Council Packet which further outlined the proposal before the Council.
Brian Coleway, representing Corporate Risk Managers, Inc., was present to
answer questions.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Staff
recommendation to retain the risk management services as stated by
Corporate Risk Managers, Inc. in its March 20, 1986, letter of proposal.
Roll call vote: Bentley, Redpath and Peterson voted "aye". Motion
carried unanimously.
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
There were none.
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AHD CDMMiSSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
There were no reports.
B. Report of City Manager
1. City's Housing Code Update
City Manager Jullie said work is in progress on a Housing Code for
the City. The Code will go to the Human Rights and Services
Commission for its review in April and then come to the City
Council for it review.
2. Proposed Fire Hall Site
City Manager Jullie stated Staff has idenitifed an optimal site
for Fire Station No. 4 at the northeast corner of Sunnybrook Road
and Homeward Hills Road. He noted the March 20, 1986, memorandum
in which this matter was discussed.
(7 7
City Council Minutes -7- March 25, 1986
Bentley asked when Homeward Hills Road might be extended to
provide access to the south. Jullie said the City would hope to
get that underway this Fall.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to direct Staff to
take an option on property located at the northeast corner of
Sunnybrook Road and Homeward Hills Road and that the purchase
price not exceed $50,000; Staff is authorized to execute a
purchase agreement for this property after May 7, 1986. Roll call
vote: Bentley, Redpath and Peterson voted "aye". Motion carried
unanimously.
3. Update on City Hall Site Selection
City Manager Jullie noted the March 21, 1986, memorandum from
Director of Community Services Lambert regarding this matter.
Jullie called attention to the proposal which the City had
received in the past few days from Hyde/Feeder's Inc. in which
property in the vicinity of Technology Drive and Prairie Center
Drive was offered as a City Hall site.
Peterson suggested Staff be directed to work with the proponent
(Hyde) to come up with a final proposal which would then be
presented to the Council at its meeting on April 1, 1986.
Lambert said he would suggest an option through the date of the
referendum be negotiated. He said he would also like to see the
proponent dedicate his 40 acres of floodplain for the park.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to direct Staff to
negotiate with Hyde an option agreement through the date of the
referendum; and to negotiate for the dedication of floodplain for
the park. Motion carried unanimously.
C. Report of City Attorney
City Attorney Pauly noted the Metropolitan Council had authorized
Staff to enjoin the City of Eden Prairie regarding the Landfill suit.
D. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Lighting 2 softball fields at Round Lake Park
Director of Community Services Lambert called attention to his
memorandum of February 27, 1986, in which this matter was
addressed.
City Council Minutes -8- March 25, 1986
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to accept the
recommendation of Staff and to accept the loci bid of Gunnar
Electric for design number two, a six-pole lighting system, for a
total cost of $54,537, for lighting the softball fields at Round
Lake Park. Roll call vote: Bentley, Redpath and Peterson voted
"aye". Motion carried unanimously.
2. Bi4X Races
Director of Community Services Lantert addressed his memorandum
dated March 20, 1986, in which this matter was discussed.
Gary Anderson, spokesman for the BMX Association, spoke to the
need for more organized racing which is what is proposed by David
Fischer, Hawk BMX of Shakopee.
Redpath asked about the insurance coverage. Gary Anderson said
insurance coverage is included in the fees which are paid by the
individual participants; coverage is for 365 days per year, 24
hours per day.
Lantert noted the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
had voted to recommend approval on a race-by-race basis with
someone from City Staff to monitor the situation. Lambert said he
had discussed with Skip Lane, the City's insurance agent, whether
or not the BMX license holder is registered in the State of
Minnesota. Lambert said the policy held by the Fischer is for $1
million.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the
request of the Eden Prairie Bl1X Association subject to the
following: 1) the BMX Association can provide liability insurance
that is approved by the City's insurance consultant; 2) the Eden
Prairie BMX Association and Hawk BMX can prove to City Staff that
each race if a non-profit event, and will allow the City Staff to
review all receipts for trophies and other expenses associated
with each race, as well as review of the revenue from that race;
3) that no concession be operated at that track other than a
concession approved by the Director of Community Services, and
that is operated by an Eden Prairie non-profit public service
organization; 4) that no Eden Prairie child is charged for any
single point race other than the initial insurance fee; 5) that
the Eden Prairie Community Services Staff monitor each race to
ensure the races are being operated per the requirements of the
City Council; 6) that the race operator provide City Staff a list
of the total number that participate in each race and a list of
the names and addressed of the Eden Prairie children participating
City Council Minutes -9- March 25, 1986
in the race; and 7) that at the end of the season the Eden Prairie BMX
Association submit a report to the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
Commission that indicates the number of children in Eden Prairie who
participated in each race to ensure that a significant number of Eden Prairie
children are being served by this use of public facilities. Motion carried
unanimously.
X. NEW BUSINESS
There was none.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adjourn the meeting at
9:35 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
97V
a{JAPPROVED MINUTES
JOINT MEETING OF EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
AND PLANNING COIMIISSION
TUESDAY, APRIL 1, I986 6:00 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATON BOARDROOM
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary D. Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock, and Paul
Redpath
PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chairman Ed Schuck, Rich Anderson,
Julianne Bye, Christine Dodge, Virginia
Gartner, Robert Hallett, and Charles E.
Ruebling
PLANNING STAFF: Director of Planning Chris Enger, Senior
Planner Mike Franzen, Zoning Administrator
Jean Johnson, Assistant Planner Steve
Durham, Assistant Planner Scott Kipp,
Assistant Planner Don Uram, Assistant
Planner David Lindahl, Administrative
Assistant Kate Karnas, Planning Secretary
Mary Wells, and Planning Secretary Barbara
Struwe -
CITY STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to
the City I4anager Craig Dawson, and
Recording Secretary Karen Michael
I. ROLL CALL
Councilmember Pidcock was absent.
Members of the Council and Commission introduced themselves.
II. INTRODUCTION OF PLANNING STAFF
Director of Planning Enger introduced the Planning Department Staff.
III. EXPLANATION OF DEVELOPMENT PRDCESS AND COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AND STAFF RE-
SPONSIBILITIFS --
Planning Director Enger reviewed the materials included in the Council
Packet: "Year-End Project Summary Report - 1985", "Substantiation for
Guide Plan Changes", "Procedures & Requirements for Planned Unit
Development", "Procedures & Requirements for Rezoning", "Procedures &
Requirements for Preliminary Plat", "Staff Review of Development
Proposals", "Developer's Agreement", "Environmental Assessment Worksheet",
Metropolitan Council Worksheet on "Information Submission Comprehensive
Plan Amendments", Memorandum regarding "Density Transfer", Memorandum
regarding "Board of Adjustments and Appeals 1985 Summary", "Summary of
1985 Zoning Administration Activities", and "Eden Prairie Community
Profile" (preliminary copy).
Joint Meeting Minutes -2- April 1, 1986
IV. REVIEW OF 1985 PLANNING ACTIVITIES
Director of Planning Enger reviewed the activities of the Planning
Department for 1985. Using charts, Enger compared the land uses in Eden
Prairie with those in the cities of Bloomington, Edina, and Minnetonka.
V. PRESENTATION DF LAND USE STATUS IN EDEN PRAIRIE AND UPDATE OF
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN ACTIVITIES
Hallett expressed concern about the amount and number of multi-family
units planned for in the Comprehensive Guide Plan. He said he does not
believe multi-family units pay their own way. Hallett said with the
amount of multi-family designated in the Guide Plan, the character of the
City will change. He questionned what would happen in the remaining one-
quarter of Eden Prairie which is yet to be developed. Redpath noted the
single-family areas in Eden Prairie are "high class" compared to other
communities. Redpath pointed out that there are trade-offs. He stated he
has seen the market place dictate what is being built. Bentley said the
Guide Plan was first developed with public input in 1968. The 1975 Guide
Plan came out with a 60% multi-family and 4D% single-family breakdown.
Redpath said each neighborhood had input into the Guide Plan. Bye said
the City can have a greater percentage of single-family units but the lots
will probably become smaller. She stated that ownership is an important
consideration.
Anderson asked about the Laukka projections regarding housing. Planning
Director Enger said that was done six years ago and at that time City
Staff was concerned because it appeared the single-family home was "dead";
that was when the 9.5 lot size was adopted. Enger noted that Eden Prairie
is atypical in the metro area since it is 80% owner-occupied which is
high. Enger said that "move-up" housing is big now. He stated Eden
Prairie has an employment base of 25,000; there are only 5,000 people who
live and work in the City. Enger said there is now a strong demand for
apartments in Eden Prairie. Enger stated if the Guide Plan is left as is
and adjustments are made in the southwest area and some adjustments are
made in the alignment of Th 212, we will come out very much as projected.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Peterson thanked Planning Director Enger and his Staff for preparing
the information and acknowledged that a lot of work went into preparing
the information.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to adjourn the meeting at
7:15 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Aga
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 86-82
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, the City Engineer, with the assistance of Black & Veatch, Inc., has
prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements to wit:
I.C. 52-072, Water Plant Expansion Project
and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public
inspection in the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official
paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon
the making of such improvement under such approved plans and
specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 3 weeks,
shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be
received until June 5, 1986, at City Hall after which time they will
be publically opened by The Deputy City Clerk and Engineer, will then
be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30 P.M., •
Tuesday, June 17, 1986, at the Eden Prairie School Administration
Building, 8100 School Road, Eden Prairie. No bids will be considered
unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash
deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the
City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 6, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Fraite, Clerk
915
TO: Mayor Peterson and. City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: David L. Olson, Senior.Engineering Technician OGQ
DATE: April 25, 1986
RE: Grading Permit Request from Michael Sutton
(11231 Pioneer Trail)
Mr. Michael Sutton has requested City Council approval of his request to do
grading on his property located at the Southwest quadrant of Pioneer Trail and
Bennett Place. The attached Preliminary Grading Plan, dated 4/21/86, shows
the anticipated grading and the proposed erosion control. Additional erosion
control material will be installed as necessary wherever drainage from the
disturbed area leaves the site. The grading will provide for the future
extension of Purgatory Road and adjacent future building sites, although, the
owner at this time will not request rezoning or platting approval. A permit
issued by the Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District must be obtained by the
owner prior to any site grading. Restoration of the disturbed areas will be
done in conformance with Watershed District requirements and as specified on
the attached plan.
If Council approved this request, staff will process the request in
conformance with City Code requirements.
DLO:sg
r j
l
441y
•
•
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-83
RESOLUTION RECEIVING 100% PETITION,
ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS & PREPARATION
OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
I.C. 52-097
Wyndham Knoll
(formerly Hidden Glen East)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council:
1. The owners of 100% of the real property abutting upon and to be
benefitted from the proposed street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and
water main have petitioned the City Council to construct said
improvements and to assess the entire cost against their property.
2. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, and upon recommendation of the
City Engineer, said improvements are hereby ordered and the City
Engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for said
improvements in accordance with City standards and advertise for
bids thereon, with the assistance of Rieke Carroll Muller Assoc.,
Inc.
3. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the City Clerk is hereby
directed to publish a copy of this resolution once in the official
newspaper, and further a contract for construction of said
improvements shall not be approved by the City Council prior to 30
days following publication of this Resolution in the City's official
newspaper.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on May 6, 1986.
Gary 0. Peterson, Mayor •
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
100% PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS
TO THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
The undersigned are all the fee owners of the real prdperty described
below and herein petition for the Eden Prairie City Council to Innceed
with making the following described improvements,
•
(General Location)
yes Sanitary Sewer Per letter to Westwood
yes Watermain Y N
" "
Y Y N Y
yes Storm Sewer
Y Y " Y
yes Street Paving
Other
Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the undersigned hereby waive any
public hearing to be held on said improvements, and further state and
agree that the total cost of said improvements shall be specially as-
sessed against the property described below in accordance with the
city's special assessment policies. We further understand that the
preliminary, estimated total cost for the said improvements is •
Street Address or other Legal • • Nimes and addresses of retitioners
Description of Property to be Served (Must be owners of se rn d)
Per attached �f fj
-• T€rT un R' oncept tomes, Inc.
-- ttfe Antbihette Doi�g�jsi
The signed original of this agreement `
has been deposited in escrow with the o a _-_
Title Insurance Company of Minnesota .•: T/ •
by the undersigned to be released for rin�oRrjsi,;" - :filing with the City of Fden Prairie k froc•-
upon the successful closing of the sale Joseph Karl Dolejsi
of land to be platted as Wyndnm Knoll bythe owners of record to New Concept Homes,
Inc, to take p ce no later than May 6, _
TETA. - ----- — ..-
n K. BeLquet — — — — —
Attorney for Owners of Record
(For City Use)
Date Received
Fr oject No.
Council Consideration _ r-
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 86-84
RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT
AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, a report has been given by the City Engineer to the City Council
recommending the following improvements to wit:
I.C. 52-094, Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Improvements
along Baker Road north of Edenvale Boulevard
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements in accordance
with the report and the assessment of property abutting or within said
boundaries for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement
pursuant to M.S.A. Section 429.011 to 429.111, at an estimated total
cost of the improvements as shown.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 3rd
of June, 1986, 7:30 P.M., at the Eden Prairie School Administration
Building, 8100 School Road. The City Clerk shall give published and
mailed notice of such hearing on the improvements as required by law.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 6, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
47'7
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-85
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
RED ROCK HEIGHTS 3RD ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of Red Rock Heights 3rd Addition has been submitted in a
manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and
under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly
had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for Red Rock Heights 3rd Addition is
approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City
Engineer's report on this plat dated April 2B, 1986.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the
above named plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on May 6, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
9k8
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works /�
FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician gj (y.
DATE: April 28, 1986
SUBJECT: RED ROCK HEIGHTS 3RD ADDITION
PROPOSAL:
William Gilk and Jervell Halmrast have requested City Council
approval of the final plat of Red Rock Heights 3rd Addition
located south of Village Woods Drive and west of Red Rock
Hills 3rd Addition in the South 1/2 of Section 16. The plat,
consisting of 14.0 acres, contains 7 single family residential
lots and 3 Outlots. The ownership of Outlot A, containing
1.78 acres, will be retained by the Developers and is to be
used for private recreational purposes by adjacent property
owners. Outlot B and C, containing 6.30 and 0.28 acres
respectively, are to be dedicated to the City.
HISTORY:
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on
February 18, 1986, per Resolution 86-27.
Zoning to RI 13.5 (covering the 7 platted lots) was finally
read and approved by the City Council on April 15, 1986, per
Ordinance 7-86. Platting and zoning procedures in conformance
to City Code requirements must be followed prior to any
development upon Outlot A.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was
executed on April 15, 1986.
VARIANCES:
A variance request (#86-02) from the setback requirements of
the Shoreline Ordinance was reviewed by the 8oard of Appeals
on February 13, 1986. This request was approved by the Board.
All other variance requests must be processed through the
Board of Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
Utilities, streets and walkways will be installed throughout
the addition in conformance with City standards and the
requirements of the Developer's Agreement.
The drainage and utility along the easterly side of Lot 7 will
contain a walkway which will connect the Village. Woods Drive
•
Page 2, Final Plat of Red Rock Heights 3rd Addition
walk to the trail along Red Rock Lake. A recordable document
converting the platted drainage and utility easement for
walkway purposes must be provided by the Developer prior to
release of the final plat.
The street name Village Woods Lane conflicts with other names
presently being used. This must be changed to a name approved
by the Director of Public Works prior to release of the plat.
PARK DEDICATION:
Requirements for Park Dedication are covered in the
Developer's Agreement. Outlots B and C are to be dedicated to
the City concurrent with recording of the plat. Warranty
Deeds conveying ownership must be provided prior to release of
the plat.
Recordable documents covering the conservation requirements
defined in the Developer's Agreement must be provided prior to
release of the plat. The conservancy easement will overlap
the drainage and utility easements shown along the westerly
and southerly lines of the platted lots.
BONDING:
Bonding shall conform to City Code and Developer's Agreement
requirements.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of the final plat of Red Rock Heights 3rd
Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the
Developer's Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $315.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $1024.
3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $280.
4. Receipt of a recordable document covering the walkway
use of a drainage and utility easement.
5. Receipt of a recordable document covering the
conservancy requirements to be placed on a drainage
and utility easement.
6. Receipt of Warranty Deeds for Outlots B and C.
7. Receipt of revised street name for Village Woods Lane.
DLO:sg
cc: Mr. Jervell Halmrast
Mr. William Gilk
Mr. Ron Krueger �.
aff��
TV
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-85
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
MARK CHARLES FOURTH ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of Mark Charles Fourth Addition has been submitted in a
manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and
under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly
had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 8Y THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for Mark Charles Fourth Addition is
approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City
Engineer's report on this plat dated April 29, 1986.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A.
waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval
date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as
described in said engineer's report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the
above named plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on May 6, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST • SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
991
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Oirector of Public Works
FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician 00
DATE: April 29, 1986
SUBJECT: MARK CHARLES FOURTH ADDITION
PROPOSAL:
The Developer, Urban Unit Corporation, has requested City
Council approval of the final plat of Mark Charles Fourth
Addition. The plat is located east of Franlo Rood and south
of County Road 1 in the South 1/2 of Section 25. This
addition constitutes Phase 4 of the Mark Charles development
and consists of 28 residential multiple units. Outlot A will
contain a private roadway to be owned and maintained by the
homeowner association. Outlot B will be landscaped and used
as a recreation area with ownership to be by the homeowner
association.
HISTORY:
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on
October 18, 1983, per Resolution 83-252.
Zoning to RM 6.5 and RI 9.5 was finally read and approved by
the City Council on November 1, 1983, per Ordinance 51-83.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was
executed on November 1, 1983.
VARIANCES:
A variance from the requirement of City Code 12.20, Subd. 2.A,
waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval
date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will
be necessary.
All other varinace requests not covered in the Developer's
Agreement must be processed through the Board of Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
The utilities, streets and walkways installed within Outlot A
will be privately owned and maintained with construction to be
in conformance with City Standards. An explantion of
9�2
Page 2, Final Plat of Mark Charles Fourth Addition 4/29/86
maintenance responsibilities, in a format acceptable to the
City Attorney, must be submitted to the Director of Public
Works prior to release of the final plat. Provisions for
street lights (private) should be included in this maintenance
provision).
A portion of Franlo Road will be dedicated through this plat.
The Developer is responsible to install the roadway and
necessary utilities to the southerly property line of the
plat. The costs of these improvements must be included in the
bond calculations.
Grading of the property was previously done by the Developer.
Erosion control material placed along the southerly property
line of this addition and of the adjacent third addition must
be reconditioned prior to release of the plat.
PARK DEDICATION:
The requirements for park dedication are covered in the
Developer's Agreement.
BONDING:
The requirements for bonding are covered in the Developer's
Agreement and is as explained under Utilities and Streets.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of the final plat of Mark Charles Third
Addtion subject to the requirements of this report, the
Developer's Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $2I0.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $512.
3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $1,842.
4. Receipt of utility and roadway maintenance statement.
5. Satisfaction of bonding requirements.
6. Reconditioning of erosion control material.
DLO:sg
cc: Mr. Mark Peterka, Urban Unit Corp.
Mr. Charles Combs, "
Mr. Ran, Krueger, Krueger & Assoc.
4
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-87
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
PRAIRIE KNOLL 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of Prairie Knoll 2nd Addition has been submitted in a manner
required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under
Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had
thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 8Y THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for Prairie Knoll 2nd Addition is
approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City
Engineer's report on this plat dated April 30, 1986.
8. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A.
waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval
date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as
described in said engineer's report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the
above named plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on May 6, 1986.
Gary O. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST SEAL
John O. Frane, Clerk
9q4
•
CITY DF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT DN FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician c), C�!�^
DATE: April 30, 1986
SUBJECT: PRAIRIE KNDLL 2ND ADDITION
PROPOSAL:
Hestia Homes, Inc., has requested City Council approval of the
final plat of Prairie Knoll 2nd Addition located north of
Valley View Road in the North 1/2 of Section 9. The proposed
plat contains 36 single family residential lots and is a
replat of Dutlots C and D Prairie Knoll.
HISTORY:
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on
August 7, 1984, per Resolution 84-167.
Zoning to RI 9.5 was finally read and approved by the City
Council on September 4, 1964, per Drdinance 48-84.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was
executed on September 4, 1984.
VARIANCES:
A variance from the requirements of City Code 12.20, Subd.
2.A, waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the
approval of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat
will be necessary.
All variance requests not authorized through the Developer's
Agreement must be processed through the Board of Appeals.
Prior to release of the final plat, the developer shall
provide legal documents to the City which address mutual
easements required by the zero lot line concept, placement of
fences, hedges, maintenance and use regulations for jointly
owned garages, architectural controls relative to building
additions and color treatments, and restrictions for outdoor
storage of equipment and recreational vehicles.
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
Municipal utilities and streets will be installed througout
the development in conformance with City standards and the
requirements of the Developer's Agreement.
The Developer entered into an assessment agreement to cover
the costs of construction of Valley View Road when the plat of
Prairie Knoll was approved. This agreement must now be
modified or a new agreement executed to conform to the legal
L description changes resulting from the new platting.
Page 2, Final Plat of Prairie Knoll 2nd Addition 4/30/86
A slope easement over parts of Lots 18 and 19, Block 3,
resulting from Valley View Road construction, will be needed.
The Developer must commit to dedication of this easement prior
to release of the plat.
The street names "Franklin Court" and "Ivy Lane" shown on the
submitted plat will be changed to "Quebec Circle" and
"Vancover Road" respectively. These changes must be made on
the plat original prior to City release.
PARK DEDICATION:
The requirements for park dedication are covered in the
Developer's Agreement.
An executed document covering the scenic easement requirement
of the Developer's Agreement must be submitted to the
Engineering Department prior to release of the plat.
BONDING:
Bonding requirements are covered in the Developer's Agreement
and shall conform to City Code requirements.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of the final plat of Prairie Knoll subject
to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement
and the following:
1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $500.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $3584.
3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $1440.
4. Receipt of documents covering zero lot line concept
requi rements.
5. Receipt of documents covering the scenic easement
requi rements.
6. Execution of an assessment agreement for improvements
to Valley View Road.
7. Satisfaction of slope easement needs for Valley View
Road construction.
8. Revision of plat reflecting street name changes.
9. Satisfaction of bonding requirements.
DLO:sg
cc: Mr. Brian Nowak, Hestia Homes, Inc.
Mr. Rodney Gordon, McCombs Knutson
gq(e
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-88
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
WYNDHAM KNOLL
WHEREAS, the plat of Wyndham Knoll has been submitted in a manner required for
platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of
the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
•
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for Wyndham Knoll is approved upon
compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
t report on this plat dated April 30, 1986.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A.
waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval
date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as
described in said engineer's report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the
above named plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on May 6, 1966..
it
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
•
991
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Oietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician
DATE: April 30, 1986
SUBJECT: WYNDHAM KNOLL
PROPOSAL:
Derrick Land Company has requested City Council approval of the
final plat of Wyndham Knoll, a single family residential
subdivision located north of Deliwood Addition and east of Hidden
Glen 2nd Addition in the North 1/2 of Section 6. The plat will
consist of 47 lots, 3 outlots and includes right-of-way dedication
for Dell Road. The site contains a total of 44.4 acres with
Outlots A, B and C being 3.97, 2.92, and 8.00 acres respectively.
Outlots A and B are to be dedicated to the City for park purposes.
A purchase agreement between the Developer and City will be
executed for Outlot C.
HISTORY:
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on May 1,
1984, per Resolution 84-87.
Zoning to RI 13.5 was finally read and approved by the City
Council on December 18, 1984, per Ordinance 31-84.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was
executed on August 8, 1985 (formerly Hidden Glen 2nd, Phase II).
VARIANCES:
A variance from the requirements of City Code 12.20, Subd 2.A,
waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval
date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be
necessary.
All other variance requests must be processed through the Board of
Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
The Developer will be responsible for the payment of costs
associated with the installation of municipal utilities and
streets. Prior to release of the final plat, the Developer must
' either submit a 100% petition requesting City installation of the
( improvements or commit to private construction in conformance to
City standards and Code requirements.
qq
Page 2, Final Plat of Wyndham Knoll 4/30/86
{
A special assessment or escrow agreement covering the construction
of Dell Road must be executed prior to release of the final plat.
This is further explained in the Developer's Agreement.
PARK DEDICATION:
Warranty Deeds converting the ownership of Outlets A and B to the
City must be provided prior to release of the plat.
A purchase agreement covering Outlot C between the Developer and
the City must be executed prior to release of the plat. The
Director of Community Services must authorize this release.
BONDING:
Bonding must conform to City Code and Developer's Agreement
requirements.
RECOMMNEDATION:
Recommend approval of the final plat of Wyndham Knoll subject to
the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the
following:
1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $1690.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $8448.
3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $1880.
4. Receipt of petition for municipal improvements or satisfaction
of bonding requirements.
5. Execution of special assessments or escrow agreement for Dell
Road construction.
6. Receipt of Warranty Deeds for Outlots A and B.
7. Execution of purchase agreement for Outlot C.
DLO:sg
cc: Mr. Dennis Marhula
Mr. Roger Derrick
Mr. Don Patton
1')G 1
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
May 6, 1986
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) PLUMBING
Dolphin Pool & Patio Aarons Plumbing
Ron Krueger & Associates Atkins Mechanical, Inc.
Glen Sandness Construction B & D Plumbing & Heating
Weis Builders, Inc. Bruce Plumbing Company
Hopkins Plumbing & Heating
Nickelson Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY) Qual ity Rooter
Southside Plumbing & Heating
B & E Enterprises
Bernard Budig
Custom Pools HEATING & VENTILATING
Grams & Son Construction
Homework, Inc. Air Conditioning Associates, Inc.
Jeremiah Construction B & o Plumbing & Heating
Kopfmann Construction Northrup Mechanical
Gene Mace Construction E.A.H. Schmidt & Associates, Inc.
Styba Builders
True Value Building Center
Western Construction Co. GAS FITTER
R. D. Ziegler Corporation
Air Conditioning Associates, Inc.
Atkins Mechanical, Inc.
MECHANICAL RIDES B & D Plumbing & Heating
Carousel of Des Moines
(Preserve Village Mall) TYPE B FOOD
Blue Bell Ice Cream
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for
the licensed activity.
Od
Pat Solie, Licensing
(
ICO"
Eden Square Shopping Center
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 47-85
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING ORDINANCE #78-56, AND,
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER
THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That Ordinance #78-56 be amended by deleting Section 2. as
written and inserting the following:
"Section 2. That the portion of the property described in
Exhibit A, attached hereto, shall be subject to the terms and
conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated May 6, 1986,
entered into between Eden Square Shopping Center Partnership, a
Minnesota general partnership, and the City of Eden Prairie, which
Agreement is hereby made a part hereof and shall further be subject
to all of the ordinances, rules, and regulations of the City of Eden •
Prairie relating to the C-Reg-Ser District."
Section 3. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on December 17, 1985, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at
a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 6th day of May, 1986.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
/00i
e
EXHIBIT A
Lot 2, Block 1, Eden Prairie Center 2nd Addition, Hennepin
County, Minnesota; and Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Eden Prairie
Center 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
OGl-
12-26-78
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE RP
' HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE 78-56
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING •
ORDINANCE 135.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended
as follows:. The following described property, Lot 5, Block 1, Eden
Prairie Center Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and
of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County,
Minnesota,
shall be and hereby is removed from the rural District and shall.
be included hereafter in the C-Reg-Ser (Regional Service) District.
Section 2. The above described property shall be subject
to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement
dated ,1978, entered into between Barmil Search
Corporation, a Minnesota corporation,
and the City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement is hereby made a •
part hereof and shall further be subject to all of the ordinances,
rules and regulations of the City of Eden Prairie relating to the
C-Reg-Ser (Regional Service) District.
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and
after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Eden Prairie on the 5th day of December ,1978, and finally
read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the
City Council of said City on the 16th day of January r1948,
Q/% 199
______
lfg H. Penze ayor
ATTE.. a
) SEAL
'r Jodi D.� e, City Cler
Pished in the Eden Prairie News on the day of ,1971
/0/0
1
Eden Square Shopping Center
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of
1986, by EDEN SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER PARTNERSHIP, a
Minnesota general partnership, hereinafter referred to as
"Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit
Development District Amendment of 9.59 acres, for construc-
tion of two one-story retail buildings totalling 83,500 sq.
ft., situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more
fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a
part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as
"the property;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting
Ordinance #47-85, to rezone the property to permit and
include retail shopping center and restaurant uses as more
fully therein described, Developer covenants and agrees to
construction upon, development, and maintenance of said
property as follows:
1. Developer shall develop the property in con-
formance with the SRW prepared Site Plan, revised
and dated , 1986, reviewed and
approved by the City Council, and attached hereto
as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifi-
cations as provided herein and subject to such
adjustments or amendments thereto as may be ap-
proved in writing by the City, as approved by the
Director of Planning or other designated officer
not materially inconsistent herewith.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance
and observance by Developer at such times and in
such manner as provided therein of all of the
terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set
forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a
part hereof.
3. Prior_to issuance of any building permit upon the
property, Developer shall submit to the City
Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's approval
of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, storm
sewer, and erosion control for the property, pro-
vided that the City, in its sole discretion, by
the Director of Planning or other designated
officer, may issue permits for grading, excavat-
ing, footings or other work in advance of receipt
and approval of all said plans or any part
thereof.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer
shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those
improvements listed above in said plans, as ap-
proved by the City Engineer, in accordance with
Exhibit C, attached hereto.
4. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the
property, Developer shall submit to the Director
of Planning, and receive the Director's approval
of:
A. Detailed plans for the signs to be located on
the property and structures.
B. Detailed plans and samples for the exterior
materials to be used on the structures.
C. Detailed plans for the lighting to be used on
the property.
D. A landscape plan, consistent with City Code
requirements.
-2-
1
E. A revised mechanical equipment screening plan,
using a continuous metal panel to screen the
mechanical units.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City in its
discretion, by its Planning Director or other
designated officer, may issue permits for grading,
excavation, footings or other work in advance of
receipt of the foregoing plans or any part
thereof.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning,
Developer agrees to construct or implement, or
cause to be constructed or implemented, those
improvements and materials listed above, as
approved by the Director of Planning.
5. Developer shall notify the City and the Watershed
District 48 hours prior to any grading, tree
removal, or tree cutting on the property.
-3-
Eden Square Shopping Center
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-66
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY •
OF ORDINANCE 47-85 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 47-85 was adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 6th day of May, 1986;
NDW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 47-85, which is
attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said
text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said
ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 47-85 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
along with proof of publication required by paragraph 8 herein,
within 20 days after said publication.
AOOPTED by the City Council on May 6, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
'oo
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 47-85
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary: This Ordinance allows zoning amendment within the
Commercial Regional Service District of land located north of Prairie Center Drive,
east of Highway #169, known as the Eden Square Shopping Center, subject to the terms
and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance,
gives the full legal description of this property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
/s/John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson
City Clerk Mayor
•
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the _ day of , 1986.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.) •
•
/607
Prairie View
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 4-66
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL DF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Commercial-Regional-Service
District.
Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be,
and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
Commercial-Regional-Service District, and the legal descriptions of land in each
District referred to in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B,
shall be, and are amended accordingly.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled '"General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of
that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of , entered into
between Prairie View Associates, a Minnesota general partnership, and the City of
Eden Prairie, and that certain Owner's Supplement to Developer's Agreement, between
Walter and Elsa Carpenter, husband and wife, and the City of Eden Prairie, dated as
of , which Agreement and Owner's Supplement are hereby made a
part hereof.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 4th day of February, 1966, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 25th day of
March, 1986.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
/(l!1q
•
•
•
EXHIBIT A
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PLATTING LEGAL
That part of the South 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 10, T116, R22.
.Daieetw Co y, Minnesota, described as follows:
Hennepin Beginning at the northeast corner of the South 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4
of said Section 10; Thence I 04'30'52" E (Bearing assumed) along the east line
of said South 1/2 a distance of 699.39 feet to the northerly right of way line
of State Trunk Highway No. 169 as described per Doc. No. 3400637; Thence
S 77°16'00"W along said right of way a distance of 750.81 feet; Thence
N 76'29'50"W a distance of 154.53 feet; Thence N 38'27'43"W a distance of
31.50 feet: Thence N 0025'30"W a distance of.765.44 feet to a point distant
37.50 feet southerly from the North line of said South 1/2; Thence N 89'5S'16"E
parallel to and distant 37.50 feet southerly from said North line a distance of
227.77 feet to the most southwesterly corner of Minnesota Tree Second Addition
as platted and of record; Thence N 89°55'16" E along the southerly line of said
Minnesota Tree Second Addition a distance of 64.12 feet; Thence N 0'04'44"W
along said southerly line a distance of 37.50 feet to the North line of said
South 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4; Thence N 89'55'16" E along said North line of
the South 1/2 said North line also being the southerly line of Minnesota Tree
Second Addition and Prairie Wash Addition, a distance of 609.53 feet to the point
of beginning.
ZONING LEGAL
That part of the South 1/2 of the Southeast 114 of Section 10. T116, R22,
2ete!rr-e(,>itty, Minnesota, described as follows:
•
11t1 EE''��li ffBeggg�inning at the northeast corner of the South 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4
of said Section 10; Thence 10°30'52" _ (Bearing assumed) along the east line
•
of said South 1/2 a distance of 644.39 feet to the northerly right of way line
of State Ttunc Highway No, 169 as described per Doc. No, 3400637: Thence
5 77°16'00"W along said right of way a distance of 750.81 feet; Thence
N 70'29'50"W a distance of 154.33 feet: Thence N 38'27'43"W a distance of
31.50 fee:; Thermo S 0'25.30"W a distance of 765.44 feet to a point distant
•
37.50 feet southerly from the South line of said South I/O; Thence N 89°5S'16" °
parallel to and distant 37.50 feet southerly from said North line a distance of
227.77 feet to the most southwesterly corner of Minnesota Tree Second Addition
as platted and of record: Thence N 89a55'16" " along the southerly line of said
Minnesota Tree Second Addition a distance of 64.12 feet-; Thence N 0.04'44"W
alone said southerly line a distance of 37.50 feet to the North line of said
•
•
5outo 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4; Thence N 80'S5'16"r along said North line of
the South 1/2 said ::nrtn line also being the eoucneriv line of Minnesota Tree
Second ..addition and Prairie Wash Addition, a distance of 609.53 feet to the point •
of beginning.
EXCEPT:
•
That part of the Southeast Cuarter of the Soutneast Quarter of Section 10,
Tawnsnip 116 North. Range 22 West or the 5th frintipal Meridian described as
follows:
•
Commencing at the southeast earner of said Southeast Quarter of the
Soutneast Quarter; thence an an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 30
minutes 52 secants West, along the east line of said Southeast Quarter of
the Soutneast Quarter, a distance of 915.31 feet to the point of beginning
of the land to be describes; thence Seats 89 degrees 29 minutes 08 seconds
West a distance or 215.00 feet; tnente North 0 degrees 30 minutes 52
secnnos West. parallel to said east line a distance of 202.07 feet; thence
, North 89 degrees 29 minutes 08 seconds East a distance of 215.00 feet to
said east line; thence south 0 degrees 30 minutes S2 seconds East, along
•
said east line to me point of beginning,
•
/010
Prairie View
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1986, by
Prairie View Associates, a Minnesota general partnership, hereinafter referred to as
"Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Change from the
Rural District to the Commercial Regional Service District for 16.17 acres, and
preliminary plat of said 16.17 acres into three lots, for purposes of construction
of a retail center, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully
described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage
hereinafter referred to as "the property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #4-86,
Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of
said property as follows:
1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the
materials revised and dated , 1986, reviewed and
approved by the City Council on February 4, 1986, and attached
hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as
provided herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or
maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided
herein.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by
Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of
all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Prior to release by the City of the final plat, Developer shall
request, and receive approval from, the Minnesota Department of
Transportation for a permit to allow for grading, berming, and
planting within the excess right-of-way along Plaza Drive, as
depicted in Exhibit B.
/O1I
•
4. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City
Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water,
storm sewer, and erosion control for the property.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or
cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said
plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit
C, attached hereto.
5. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property,
Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the
Director's approval of:
A. A revised landscape plan which meets the minimum Code
requirements for amount of landscape materials and which
screens parking areas, loading areas, and the north side of
the project from adjacent roadways and land uses. Developer
shall also submit sight lines through the property from
adjacent properties and roadways to show the effectiveness
of the landscape plan for screening.
B. A final plan indicating lighting for the property.
C. A final plan indicating the signage program, with details
regarding materials.
D. A final plan indicating exterior building materials,
including brick and metal panels, as well as materials to be
used for screening of mechanical equipment on the
structures. Bronze metal panel shall be used, instead of
wood, for Lot 2 of the property, as depicted on Exhibit B,
attached hereto.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer agrees to
implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements listed
above in said plans, as approved by the Director of Planning.
•
•
/ail
Prairie View
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-45
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE 4-86 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 4-86 was adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 25th day of March,
1986;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 4-86, which is
attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said
text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said
ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 4-86 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein,
within 20 days after said publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on March 25, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
t
/013
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 4-86
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ON '
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAN
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Su�mnar This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located at 1-494 an
Highway # a5 t the intersection of Prairie Center Drive, known as Prairie View, froT
the Rural District to the Commercial Regional Service District, subject to the term
and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance
gives the full legal description of this property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
/s/John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson
City Clerk Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the _day of , 1986.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
IOIq
{
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John Frane
DATE: May 1, 1986
RE: Final 1985 General Fund Budget
Attached for your review and adoption are the amended figures
for the 1985 Expenditure Budget. Revenues for 1985 are
$6,900,000.00 and expenses are $6,898,000.00.
lOt3
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
1983 BUDGET
GENERAL FUND
EXPENDITURES
BUDGET
1985IADJI EXPENDED BALANCE
MAYOR & COUNCIL 19600 19200.00 400.00
CITY MANAGER 116500 116416.76 83.24
ELECTIONS 2000 1373.41 626.59
ASSESSING DEPT 166900 165953.29 946.71
BLDG INSPECTION DEPT 311800 311143.45 656.55
COMMUNITY SERVICES
ADMIN & 74700 74700.00 0.00
PARK MAINTENANCE 388900 387926.94 973.06
BEACH 27900 27018.53 981.47
HIST k CUL ARTS 7300 6691.30 808.70
HUMAN SERVICES 47700 46909.87 790.13
PARK PLANNING 20500 20451.76 48.24
ORGANIZED ATHLETIC 94400 93899.24 500.76
ROUND LAKE CONCE88 8400 8120.40 279.60
RECREATION 106600 106216.69 383.31
FORESTRY 72900 72863.73 36.27
COMMUNITY CENTER 444700 443978.71 721.29
FINANCE 139000 138870.55 129.45
PLANNING DEPT 203000 202308.92 691.08
PUBLIC SAFETY DEPT
POLICE 1423300 1422983.23 316.77
FIRE 205900 205131.56 768.44
CIVIL DEFENSE 23400 23091.74 308.26
ANIMAL CONTROL 24000 23703.17 296.83
FIRE k P/S BLOSS 107900 107045.03 854.17
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT
ENBINEERINB 315500 315322.64 177.36
EDUIPMENT NNTC 392500 392161.33 338.67
SNOW & ICE CONTROL 95200 95189.89 10.11
STREETB k DRAINAGE 550000 549379.85 620.15
STREET LIGHTING 104000 103343.36 656.64
P/W k PARK BLDG 25500 25290.52 209.48
SHARED SERVICES
GENERAL 316300 315394.11 905.89
DATA PROCESSING 39000 32955.64 44.36
LEGAL COUNSEL 110000 109904.31 95.69
CITY HALL 46800 45890.17 909.83
PUBLIC INFORMATION 14000 13795.04 204.16
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS &
TRAINING 813000 812174.66 825.34
RESERVE 61500 60968.34 531.66
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 6920800 6097769.74 17030.26
MMMMM
/r"1&
•
CITY OF'EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
•
RESOLUTION NO. 86-89
A RESOLUTION FINDING THE AMENDED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
WORKSHEET FOR EDEN PLACE, A PRIVATE ACTION, DOES
NOT REQUIRE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
WHEREAS, the City Council of Eden Prairie did hold a hearing on September 3,
1985, to consider the Eden Place proposal of Tipton Corporation; and,
WHEREAS, said development is located on approximately 32.8 acres of land
located north of Anderson Lakes Parkway, west of Highway #169; and;
WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on
the Eden Place proposal of Tipton Corporation and did recommend approval of the
Environmental Assessment Worksheet finding the project of no significant impact;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, that an Environmental Impact Statement is not necessary for the Eden
Place proposal of Tipton Corporation, because the project is not a major action,
does not have significant environmental effects, and is not of more than local
significance.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a Negative Declaration Notice shall be •
officially filed with the'Minnesota Environmental Quality Council.
ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
•
ATTEST: , J
John D. Frane, City Clerk
/Ui 7
•
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-90
A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING MAY 18 - 24, 1986 AS
SMALL BUSINESS WEEK IN EDEN PRAIRIE
WHEREAS, there are 15.2 million small businesses in the United States;
and
WHEREAS, businesses employing fewer than 500 persons comprise more than
99% of Minnesota's 105,516 private enterprises; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota businesses with fewer than 20 employees employ more
than 85% of the State's work force; and
WHEREAS, from 1969 - 1976, businesses with fewer than 500 employees
generated 86.7% of all new jobs nationwide and 66% of employment growth from
businesses with 20 or fewer employees; and
WHEREAS, 50% of all inventions, innovations and patents are developed
by small businesses; and
WHEREAS, the growth and prosperity of Minnesota's small business is
essential to the economic well being of our State;
WHEREAS, there are many small businesses in the City of Eden Prairie
and the growth and prosperity of these small businesses is very important to
the economic well being of our City;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that in recognition of the fact that
Small Business is big in the USA, both in innovations and employment, we hereby
proclaim May 18 - 24, 1986 as SMALL BUSINESS WEEK IN EDEN PRAIRIE.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 6th day of May, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
ion
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Donald Uram, Assistant Planner
TROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: May 1, 1986
RE: SUMMARY OF THE TREE INVENTORY - DONNAY'S ROUND LAKE ESTATES
Following is a brief summary of the sizes, number, and varieties of trees retained
and lost due to construction for the Donnay's Round Lake Estates project. For
approximate locations, refer to the Preliminary Grading and Drainage plan of the
April 29, 1986, submittal.
Retained Lost due to Construction
Oak 4, 12-inch (48 inches) 3, 12-inch (36 inches)
4, 14-inch (56 inches) 2, 14-inch (28 inches)
3, 18-inch (54 inches) 3, 15-inch (45 inches)
1, 19-inch 3, 18-inch (54 inches)
1, 20-inch 1, 22-inch
3, 21-inch (63 inches) 2, 24-inch (48 inches)
1, 23-inch
9, 24-inch (216 inches)
1, 29-inch
2, 36-inch (72 inches)
Total 29 trees 600 inches 14 trees 233 inches
Elm 5, 12-inch (60 inches) 4, 12-inch (48 inches)
1, 13 inch 2, 17-inch (34 inches)
1, 16-inch 4, 18-inch (72 inches)
3, 18-inch (54 inches) 1, 19-inch
1, 21-inch 2, 20-inch (40 inches)
1, 24-inch 1, 22-inch
1, 30-inch 1 26-inch
Total 13 trees 218 inches 15i trees 261 inches
l019
Memo
May 1, 1986
Page Two
Retained Lost due to Construction
Ash 1, 8-inch 2, 8-inch (16 inches)
8, 12-inch (96 inches) 2, 12-inch (24 inches)
1, 14-inch 1, 17-inch
2, 15-inch (30 inches) 2, 18-inch (36 inches)
6, 18-inch (108 inches) 1, 19-inch
1, 24-inch 1, 20-inch
1, 21-inch
1 29-inch
Total 19 trees 280 inches 11 trees 182 inches
Cottonwood 3, 30-inch (90 inches)
Total 3 trees 90 inches
Hackberry 1, 12-inch 1, 24-inch
Cherry 1, 20-inch
Maple 1, 12-inch 1, 12-inch
3, 18-inch (54 inches)
1, 20-inch
Total 5 trees 86 inches
GRANO TOTAL 63 trees 50 trees
1122 inches 896 inches
irjnr
•
I.
MNY 196
April 23, 1986
Mr. Carl Jullie
7759 North Shingle Creek Dr.
Brooklyn Park, MN 55443
Mr. Carl Jullie,
As a concerned citizen of Eden Prairie and as a homeowner in the area
directly adjacent to the proposed Donnay's Round Lake development,
I would like to voice a concern that was unfortunately missed at the
public hearing on Tuesday, April 15th. I know I speak for a number
of my neighbors, and also concerned Eden Prairie citizens in other
areas of the city, when I say that Eden Prairie seems to be allowing
too many multiple family dwellings to be built. I think that multiple
family dwellings are good for the city as long as they are planned
and built in areas that can handle them, i.e. areas that have direct
access to a major thoroughfare such as Highway 5, County Road 4, Mitchell
Road, Valley View Road. When the city starts to permit multi-family
developments in the middle of already established single family neighborhoods,
that is where we as homeowners and taxpayers have to draw the line!
When the Donnay developers presented their plan to the neighborhood
in November, 1985, they were repeatedly told that we, as area homeowners,
did not want to see multi-family dwellings and favored single family
homes for this area. Our reasons were effectively conveyed at the
public hearing and I don't feel I need to repeat them now. I feel
that the Donnay developers did the neighbors a disservice by ignoring
our requests and concerns.
I would like to suggest a solution to the land use of this area that
would satisfy the concerns of preserving the existing pond, trees,
and wildlife and at the same time provide a valuable asset to the
city of Eden Prairie. My suggestion is that the city consider developing
this area into a city nature center and wildlife preserve. Many of
our neighboring communities have similar areas and this area provides
an ideal setting. It is a beautiful area, offering a large wood area,
a major pond and a very large marsh, with natural hills and valleys.
The wildlife includes ducks, geese, herons, egrets, muskrats and the
usual variety of birds.
jl
PJsf
April 23, 1986
Page Two
I sincerely hope that this idea is given serious consideration. I
think it would be a shame to see an area such as this one, with such
valuable natural amenities, become yet another Eden Prairie multiple
family development.
Sincerely,
ulie Geason
7470 Atherton Way
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
160'.
DES/8050 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD/EDEN PRAIRIE.MN 553442499/TELEPHONE 161 21 937-2262 •
April 29, 1986
Julie Geason -
7470 Atherton Way
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
RE: Letter of April 23, 1986
Dear Ms. Geason:
I wish to thank you for taking the time to write a letter expressing your
views regarding the Donnay Round Lake Development Proposal. I understand your
concern regarding possible destruction of the existing pond and the woods
located west of your neighborhood. I too have that same concern; however, I
believe the revisions that are being proposed for the Donnay Subdivision will
preserve the majority of the pond and much of the woods.
You are correct in your assumption that the only way to completely preserve
the existing pond, trees, and wildlife would be for the City to acquire this
area for preservation purposes. It is a beautiful area and does offer a wide
variety of habitat for various species of wildlife. I believe with the
revised plan the majority of the wildlife will still be served by this pond
and the large marsh. The wildlife that relies on a secluded wooded lot;
obviously, will be displaced.
You note that many of our neighboring communities have City nature centers and
wildlife preserves. Although, the City of Eden Prairie does not have a formal
nature center the City has preserved more land for wildlife preservation and
has more land designated for future acquisition for preservation than any of
our neighboring cities with the possible exception of Bloomington. The City
presently owns nearly 1300 acres of parkland; over 700 acres of that is
designated for wildlife preservation. The City also has acquired over 360
acres of land around Anderson Lakes strictly for wildlife preservation; this
property is now operated by the Suburban Park Reserve District as a wildlife
preservation area and future nature center site. There is also 1700 acres of
land designated for a wildlife preservation area in the Minnesota River
floodplain that will be operated by the Department of Interior and the State
Department of Natural Resources.
I do not cite these other examples of wildlife preservation areas to minimize
the value of the pond and marsh area west of your home, but I do believe it is
important to remember that the City of Eden Prairie has invested heavily in
wildlife preservation, while recognizing there are many smaller ponds and
marsh areas similar to the site on the Donnay property that are not included
in the park and open space system plan.
The City attempts to work with developers to preserve these sites and
incorporate them within their development plans. I believe this is being done
with the Donnay proposal and hope that you will understand why the City cannot
afford to acquire all of these sites.
013
Julie Geason -2- April 29, 1986
If you have any further questions regarding either this particular site, or
the park and open space system plan in general, please feel free to contact me
at 927-2262, ext. 37. -
Sincerely,
Robert A. Lambert
Director of Community Services
RAL:md
•
l
GAIR ft ASSOCIATES
Division of Kidde Consultants,Inc.
Site Design and Planning Consultants
April 29, 1986
Mr. Chris Enger
Director of Planning
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Re: Donnay's Round Lake Estates
Dear Mr. Enger:
Since our last appearance at the City Council meeting on April 15, 1986, and
under the direction of Paul Donnay and Don Uram, we are providing you the
following comments on the issue of traffic and revised landscape plan. Mr. Len
Olson will be transmitting revised engineering documents directly from his
office.
TRAFFIC
Mr. Dietz has informed me of concerns the City has over the use of Atherton and
Kilmer Avenue as construction traffic roadways. These roads apparently are not
suitable for heavy construction equipment.
I have discussed this matter with tor. Donnay, and he has informed me that it
would be possible to require his contractors, in the terms of their sub-con-
tractor agreements, to access the Donnay site with heavy equipment and heavy
loads ONLY from Evener Way, Hames, and Valley View. These roads, as tor. Dietz
has indicated, are of adequate design and of collector road classification.
Also on the subject of traffic and daily trip generation, we have researched
prior traffic analyses and find the following to be of value in considering
traffic impacts.
1. The 2/21/86 Staff Report (Page 4, Traffic) stated that the prior
approved PUD concept plan would generate 66D trips per day.
2. A traffic analysis prepared for the Crescent Ridge proposal by Benshoof
and Associates in October 1983 projected daily traffic generations for
condominiums to he 5.2 to 5.6 ADT and 10 ADT for single family detached
units.
3. A traffic generation study conducted by or. Robert oorast, Manager of
the Traffic and Transportation Division of Orr-Schelen-Mayeron R
Associates, Inc. involving a 56 unit condominium development in the
2021 East Hennepin Avenue • Suite 250 • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413
612/331-8668 TWX:910-576-3111 10
Page Two
Mr. Chris Enger
April 29, 1986
City of Minnetonka, also generated 5.2 trips daily per dwelling unit
(2, 4 and 8 unit structures).
4. A third study conducted for a 160 unit 8-plex condominium project in
the City of Maple Grove revealed 5.6 ADT per dwelling unit also.
Based on available data, daily traffic generation calculations for the Donnay
project would be as follows:
Approach A - Total ADT
20 Single Family at 10 ADT per Unit = 200 ADT
64 Condominium at 5.3 ADT = 339 ADT
Total 539 ADT
Approach B - Total ADT
20 Single Family at 10 AOT per Unit = 200 ADT
32 Unit Townhomes/Condominiums at 8 ADT per Unit = 256 ADT
32 Unit Condominium, 8 Plex at 5.3 ADT = 169 ADT
Total 625 ADT
In either instance (Approach A or Approach B) the ADT totals are less than the
660 projected for the previously approved plan. In addition to the reduced
daily traffic total, p.m. peak hours conditions will be less than previously
approved plans, and further mitigation is available by virtue of the presence of
Lorence Way. This alternative access will be used by future home owners and was
not available to the previously approved Crescent Ridge Plan.
Another factor to consider is the timing of the Donnay development. It is
expected that the construction of the complete project would occur in no less
than a 3 year time period with full occupancy occuring in about 4 years depend-
ing upon market performance.
One final but important consideration is the fact that the R unit condominiums
are occupied primarily by single persons (singles, widowed and elderly);
Approximately 65% of the units, based on prior projects. These households have
only one car and generate fewer daily trips.
The fact that most of the condominiums will be occupied and owned by single
heads of households, and that there are no children involved, is a primary
reason that trip generation rates are lower.
LANDSCAPE PLAN
The original Midland Nursery landscape plan has been revised to accommodate the
recently proposed roadway realignments and the accommodation of the central
major wetland feature. The slight rearrangement of units has created additional
opportunity for landscaping in the southwest quadrant of proposed Kilmer Way
Page Three
Mr. Chris Enger
April 29, 1986
and Evener Way. The planing of trees in the east boulevard of proposed Kilmer
Way and to the west of the central ponding area have been provided to enhance
the aesthetics as viewed from the existing homes located to the east of the
site. In addition to these landscape improvements, which we believe result in a
very positive influence on the final site plan, the landscaping plan has also
been adjusted to meet the caliper inch requirements of the current City Poli-
cies.
The realignment of Kilmer Way to accommodate the central ponding area has been
carefully adjusted to avoid any further loss of significant existing natural
planting specimens. These planting diagrams have been prepared in accordance
with the policies of the City and represent a rather dense planting program for
the site.
CONCLUSIONS
As I had already indicated at our April 15th Council Meeting, we are convinced
that this plan has significant advantages over the original plan submitted in
December 1985 as well as the formally approved Crescent Ridge Plan in that it
has significantly preserved on-site natural resources, such as the central pond
• and natural vegetation. It has more carefully situated housing units to the
/ betterment of the environment as well as future residents of the area. The
\ present plan provides for a greater variety of housing and requires less
blacktop area than previously approved plans and finally the current plan will
generate no greater traffic volumes daily or at p.m. peak hours than prior
approved plans.
The proposed development follows an orderly progression of existing roadways and
utilities and is complementary to the existing abutting land uses, and accommo-
dates guided and/or anticipated development to the west and southeast.
We look forward to the final resolution of this plan review request and to the
opportunity to construct this residential development in the City of Eden
Prairie.
Kindest regards,
GAIR'& ASSOCIATES
/;/J
hael . G ir, ASYA
MJG:
cc: Paul Donnay
Vern Donnay
Len Olson
1
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-78
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE HIDDEN GLEN 4TH ADDITION
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT
TO THE OVERALL HIDDEN GLEN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for
the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the Hidden Glen 4th Addition is considered a proper amendment to
the overall Hidden Glen Planned Unit Development Concept; and,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the
request of Derrick Land Company for PUD Concept Amendment approval to the overall
Hidden Glen Planned Unit Development Concept for Hidden Glen 4th Addition and
recommended approval of the PUD Concept Amendment to the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on May 5, 1986;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Hidden Glen 4th Addition PUD Concept Amendment, being in
Hennepin County, Minnesota, and legally described as outlined in
Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval to
the overall Hidden Glen Planned Unit Development Concept as outlined
in the application materials for Hidden Glen 4th Addition.
3. That the PUD Concept-►Amendment meets the recommendations of the
Planning Commission dated April 21, 1986.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 6th day of May, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane,, City Clerk
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 86-79
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive
Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and,
WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review
and comment; and,
WHEREAS, the proposal of Derrick Land Company for development of Hidden Glen
4th Addition for Neighborhood Commercial use requires the amendment of the Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: approximately
10.95 acres located south of Townline Road, east of Highway #101 from Low Density
Residential to Medium Density Residential, and approximately 3.45 acres located
south of Townline Road, east of Highway #1D1 from Low Density Residential to
Neighborhood Commercial.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 6th day of May, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
/0079
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #86-80
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT DF HIDDEN GLEN FOR
DERRICK LAND COMPANY
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Hidden Glen for Derrick Land Company, dated February
19, 1986, consisting of 50.2 acres into 119 lots, one outlot, and road right-of-way,
a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the
provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments
thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 6th day of May, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
/o30
CITY OFFICES/8950 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD/EDEN PRAIRIE.MN 55344.2499/TELEPHONE I612I 937-2262 a agen
February 13, 1986
Mr. Don Patton
Derrick Land Company
1650 Shelard Tower
St. Louis Park, Mn 55426
Re: Hidden Glen East Development
Dear Mr. Patton:
Subsequent to our February 7, 1986, meeting, we have reviewed the issues and
offer the following as the City Staff position on development in the Hidden
Glen area. In the same format as the memo you prepared regarding the February
7 meeting, our position is as follows:
I. Park Development
{ -Developer will grade park and finish grade top soil, but will not
build playfields.
-Any excavation in excess of 12,000 C.Y. will be paid for by the City
at $.90 per C.Y. The method of reimbursement will be determined by
the City (cash or credits).
-The City will pay for utility services to the park. (Utility services
do not include the lateral sewer and water system that will be
installed in the Dell Road right-of-way, but will include any
connections to that lateral system for specific park use.
2. Dell Road Swamp Crossing
The Developer will be responsible for all costs associated with the
swamp crossing as if poor soils did not exist. In other words, if the
soil conditions in the area were good, the Developer shall pay for all
grading work necessary to build the cross section to final grades.
The City of Eden Prairie will pay actual costs up to $50,000 for the
extra costs to correct the poor soil condition beyond the Developer's
responsibility. These items might include:
-Construction fabric
-Typical 3' Sand Cushion
-Surcharge Cost
JU)?!
•
C C
Mr. Don Patton -2- February 13,
1986
The work in this area shall be under the supervision of a competent
soil testing firm.
3. Dell Road
The City of Eden Prairie will not participate in the road construction
of the southerly 400' of Dell Road at the swamp crossing, except extra
width costs for road construction beyond 32' and extra costs due to a
thicker cross section than a residential collector facility as
prescribed in our City Standard. The City Code provides for, and the
City has consistently followed a policy of requiring, Developers to
pay for all road construction and utility extensions to property
lines.
4. Sidewalks and Paths
The City will pay the costs for the 8' bituminous pathway along the
frontage of the proposed park area. The Developer will be responsible
for the bike path and concrete sidewalk in all other areas. The City,
however, agrees to the concrete sidewalk terminating at the
intersection of the most southerly street running easterly from Dell
Road. Therefore, no sidewalk will be required through the "swamp
crossing".
5. Utilities Construction
The City will pay for:
-Oversizing water mains beyond 8" in diameter and sanitary
sewer above 8" in diameter.
-Services to the park as described above.
-Costs related to additional width of Dell Road beyond 32'.
The City will not participate in the looping costs for the water main
beyond the oversizing cost stated above. We will consider more cost
effective alternates to building the water main at the proposed "swamp
crossing".
Furthermore, the City Staff would support the concept of constructing that
portion of Dell Road south of Pleasant View Road as a separate project from
the segment of Dell Road north of Pleasant View Road. However, the north
segment could not be built prior to the south segment being completed or under
construction and a special assessment agreement regarding the entire section
of Dell Road needs to be executed prior to any additional development
occurring.
Finally, Staff would recommend to City Council that the initial installment of
the park acquisition cost be increased at an 8% interest rate from the date
the payment was to have been made in accordance with the purchase agreement.
No additional increases to the acquisition price are acceptable.
C (7
Mr. Don Patton -3- February 13, 1986
I believe that this summarizes the City Staff position on the issues
surrounding Hidden Glen and the construction of Dell Road. If you and your
clients concur with this proposal, please provide me a written response so
that we can begin preparing a special assessment agreement that incorporates
these details. If you have specific questions about this proposal, please
feel free to contact Gene Dietz.
Sinc a y,
�" / i
1Carl J. 11ie
City Manager
sg
cc: Mr. Gene Dietz
Mr. Dennis Marhula
Mr. Dick Feerick
4-Mr. Chris Enger
Mr. Bob Lambert
(
133
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: May 1, 1986
SUBJECT: Hidden Glen North and Revised PUD Plan
This staff report is supplementary to the Planning Staff Reports of March 7,
1986 and April 11, 1986.
The parks, recreation and nautral resource issues of the Hidden Glen North
proposal relate to neighborhood park acquisition, Purgatory Creek Conservation
Area acquisition, trails and sidewalks.
NEIGHBORHODD PARK ACQUISITION
In 19B4, the City drafted a purchase agreement between the City of Eden
Prairie and Joseph and Jay Dolejsi for the acquisition of Hidden Glen
Neighborhood Park. The City agreed to a contract for deed for a total cost of
$80,000 for aproximately 8 acres. The City was to pay $40,000 the first year,
plus two additional annual payments of $20,000, plus B% interest on the unpaid
balance. The acquisition price included all taxes and special assessments due
and payable on the property at the time of the closing. The Derrick Land
Company agreed to pay all special assessments pending, approved or levied
against the property in the Developer's Agreement with the City.
The Developer also agreed to grade the park and finish grade the topsoil. Any
excavation in excess of 1200 cu. yds. would be paid for by the City at $.90
per cubic yard.
This agreement has been held up due to negotiations between the City and the
Developer regarding the location and cost sharing for Oe11 Road. The
community services Staff recommend that this purchase agreement and contact
• for deed be completed prior to any further final platting of the Hidden Glen
Subdivision.
PURGATORY CREEK CONSERVATION AREA ACQUISITION
In the original Hidden Glen PUD the Community Services Staff recommended the
City require dedication of the 4 acre outlot in the Hidden Glen 2nd Addition,
Phase II, that has a marsh area abutting the Edenbrooke Conservation Area.
With the acquisition of this 4 acre outlot, Hidden Glen Park would be
connected with the Edenbrooke Conservation Area significantly expanding this
important greenway system in the northwest park of Eden Prairie. The
Community Services Staff recommend that the acquisition of this outlot be a
condition of the revised PUD.
TRAILS AND SIDEWALKS
�. Dell Road is planned to be a major north/south street in the western portion
of Eden Prairie. The City had always planned to require a sidewalk on the
west side of the street and an 8' asphalt bikeway on the east side of the
street; however, when the street was constructed north of Duck Lake Trail
through the Purgatory Creek floodplain every foot of width of the road was
extremely expensive, therefore, this section of road was limited to a 5'
concrete sidewalk on the west side of the street. The City must now decide if
it wants to continue with simply a 5' concrete sidewalk on the west side of
the street, north to Townline Road or if the City wishes to switch back to a
concrete sidewalk on the west side of the road and an 8' asphalt trail on the
east side of the road. There will be heavy pedestrain traffic along Dell Road
from individuals living both east and west of Dell Road walking to the
neighborhood commercial area, to the north, and to the neighborhood park and
conservation area to the south. The Community Services Staff recommend
continuing a 5' concrete sidewalk along the east side of the road the entire
lenghth of Dell Road, and installing an 8' asphalt bikeway from Street "C" in
Hidden Glen 2nd Addition Phase II, north to the neighborhood commercial
center.
The Community Services Staff also recommend a revision from the pedestrian
plan on Attachment D of the April I1th Planning Staff Report that depicts the
sidewalk along Barrington Drive discontinuing north at street "F" and then
following steet "F" easterly to Dell Road. The Communtiy Services Staff would
recommend eliminating the sidewalk along street "F" and continuing along
Barrington Drive north and easterly to Dell Road. The Community Services
Staff believe that Barrington Drive will be a more heavily travelled roadway
than street "F" and will be a more direct route for more people that may be
walking to the neighborhood commercial center.
The Community Services Staff recommend approval of Hidden Glen North as per
the April 11, 1986 Planning Staff Report and the revisions recommended in this
memo.
BL:md
1
STAFF REPORT
4,
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: April 11, 1986
PROJECT: Hidden Glen North
LOCATION: Southeast quadrant of Highway #101 and Townline Road.
APPLICANT: Derrick Land Company
FEE OWNER: Roger Derrick and Joseph Dolesji
REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Amendment Review on 130.25 acres.
2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 50.2 acres, with
variances for street frontage and lot size.
3. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density
Residential to Medium Density Residential on 10.95 acres,
and from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial
on 3.45 acres.
4. Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial
on 3.45 acres, Rural to RM-2.5 on 10.95 acres, Rural to R1-
9.5 on 15.8 acres, and Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.9 acres.
5. Preliminary Plat of 50.2 acres into 63 single family lots,
two outlots, and road right-of-way.
I i ,
Background _• --
This is a continued item from the ��•�•A.V'
March 1, 1986, meeting, with the
.0���► PROPOSE J.
development plans returned to the •♦• •�♦ / .. -..;,,,,,
proponent for revisions relative to 5.,..♦ \ .- :,;,,-.4-'„ :
the following: , ►i.... \ ,..r r{
1. Transition between single ��il ' • (
family and multiple family land �y � r / ,:sztr.
uses. �• � /A 4 .si.
2. Transition between R1-13.5 .; 1 000 ` '
and R1-9.5 zoning districts. �7
3. Meeting minimum street - �Irr - I
pi 4 on.' i..1 4.-, ,,,,,,LI 4
i>i,.#>,\-1114111.1=as '' 11 14.4... -
Nir,":'.--e.....,._ tin _.z.:,...
.. „. -
. ..,. _ ,, ..: /,
ra-A ? AREA LOCATION MAP
Hidden Glen North 2 April 11, 1986
frontage requirements in the R1-9.5 and R1-13.5 zoning districts.
4. Reduce the density of the proposed multiple family area.
5. Provide a housing plan for R1-9.5 area.
6. Submit a detailed storm water run-off plan for review.
7. Provide the minimum garage size stall for the townhome units.
8. Zoning of the commercial lot should not be approved until detailed zoning
plans are available.
9. Revise the Planned Unit Development (PUD) phasing plan or provide a
temporary road connection to Townline Road.
Revised Planned Unit Development Concept
The new PUD compares with the previous PUD according to the following chart:
Total Total #R1-13.5 #R1-g.5 #Multi Commercial
Acres Units Family Acres
Initial PUD 50.2 147 10 53 84 3.45
New PUD 50.2 116 17 61 38 3.45
The major change in the PUD is the type and number of multiple family units which
has been reduced from 84 townhomes to 38 twinhomes.
The table below indicates the densities based on the revised concept plan:
R1-9.5 R1-13.5 Twinhomes Overall Overall
Single Family Residential
Density 2.68 du/acre 2.09 du/acre 2.38 du/acre 2.53 du/acre 2.50 du/acr
Gross Acres 22.72 acres 8.13 acres 15.95 acres 30.85 acres 46.80 acres
Transition Between Single Family and Multiple Family Land Uses
The initial PUD proposed 30-foot minimum setbacks between the townhomes and the rear
lot lines of the adjacent RI-9.5 zoning district. The revised PUD has a setback
which varies between 20 to 90 feet with a 65-foot average. Though the number and
mass of the multiple family units has been reduced, the open space should be
suplemented with landscaping as originally depicted on the previous PUD where shown
on Attachment A. Prior to Council review, proponent must submit a detailed
landscape plan with a mixture of coniferous and shade trees.
Transition Between the R-13.5 and R1-9.5 Zoning Districts
The plan has been changed to R1-13.5 lots on both sides of Street E and the
t transition between the R1-9.5 and R1-13.5 zoning districts occurs across the rear
lot lines as previously recommended.
ft �,r
Hidden Glen North 3 April 11, 1986
Meet Minimum Street Frontage Requirements in the R1-13.5 and R1-9.5 Zoning
Districts
All lots in the subdivision meet or exceed the minimum street frontage requirements
for both zoning districts.
Reduce the Density of the Multiple Family Outlot
The number of multiple family units has been reduced from 84 to 38 with a
corresponding decrease in the size of the multiple family area. See Attachment B.
The density of the multiple family area is 2.38 units per gross acre as compared
with 5.4 units per gross acre before. The net density is 3.47 units per acre as
compared with 7.67 units per net acre before.
Provide a Housing Plan for the R1-9.5 Area
Prior to building permit issuance, the proponents must submit a housing plan which
keys specific unit types to lots in a manner which no two units are alike side by
side, opposite, or directly across from each other.
Submit Detailed Storm Water Run-off Plans
Conceptually storm water run-off is designed to flow in an easterly direction
towards the flood plain area adjacent to Purgatory Creek. Concurrent with the final
plat approval of the property, the proponent will be responsible for supplying the
Engineering Department with a detailed storm water run-off plan.
Provide the Minimum Garage Size Stall for the Townhome Units
Since the unit type has changed from townhouse to twinhome, this requirement is not
longer valid. Parking will be addressed in the twinhome zoning section.
No Zoning Request Should be Granted Until Detailed Plans have been Supplied for
Review on the Commercial Lots
Detailed plans have been submitted and will be reviewed under the commercial zoning
section.
Revise the PUD Phasing Plat or Provide a Temporary Road Connection to Townline
Road
The previous Staff Report recommended that a detailed plan be submitted to show how
portions of the project would be phased over time. This was important since the
upgrading of the intersection of Dell Road and Townline Road was not to occur until
1988 by the County. Therefore, the townhome and the commercial portion should not
be zoned or platted until the road upgrading occurs or the proponent should submit
for Staff and County review an interim solution which illustrates how Dell Road
would work with the existing road intersection. The proponents have submitted an
alternative temporary access plan for the Dell Road/Townline Road intersection. The
County and the City agree that the emphasis on the intersection should be for the
Townline/County Road #62 traffic. Final approval of the detailed alignment and
grades of the intersection will be required by the City Engineer and County Highway
Department prior to final plat approval.
•
Hidden Glen North 4 April 11, 1986
Twinhomes
Since the gross density of the twinhomes is 2.38 units per gross acre and 3.47 units
per net acre, with zero lot line proposed, the appropriate zoning district would be
RM-6.5 instead of RM-2.5. Although the reduction in density is a plus, the twinhome
development must be reviewed under a different set of criteria than the townhomes.
Architectural variety and site plan orientation are two important requirements for
twinhome developments. Typically, twinhomes are double-car, double-garage front
buildings, which contributes to poor curb appeal and limits architectural variety.
Architectural control Is required in the R1-9.5 zoning district even if applied to
the twinhomes would alone not be enough to improve the curb appeal if all garage
front units are proposed. To augment architectural control, site plan control is
needed. The site plan for the twinhomes shows a mixture of three different building
types including endloaded garages, sideloaded garages, and centerloaded garages.
The preliminary plat has been designed to accommodate the site plan as proposed by
the proponent. At building permit issuance, the proponent must submit a housing
variety plan which depicts specific unit types on each lot in a manner such that no
two units are alike side by side, opposite, or directly across from each other.
Commercial Zoning
Zoning to commercial is proposed on Lots 19 and 20. Detailed site and architectural
plans have been submitted for Lot 20 only.
A commercial center of 14,328 square feet, with Torn Thumb as an anchor tenant, is
proposed at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.16. Building and parking areas meet
minimum setback requirements for commercial zoning. Parking is provided at a ratio
of six spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross building area which is a variance from
the City Code requirement of eight spaces per 1,000. The granting of the variance
can be accomplished through the PUD District Review. Parking at six spaces per
1,000 is acceptable and is consistent with other commercial centers in the
community.
The previous Staff Report recommended that the commercial building have a
residential character and the site plan should transition to the future residential
land uses to the east. The one-story commercial center is residential in character
with a sloped roof including dormers on the west elevation. Shingles will be used
to add to add residential character. The primary building material will be
facebrick with stucco as an accent band around the building. The residential
character of the building does not work as well on the east (service elevation) side
of the building and would benefit from a continuation of the same height and slope
roof to match the front of the building. This will help screen mechanical units and
provide better architectural continuity. At the time of building permit issuance,
the proponent must supply samples of proposed exterior building materials for
review.
The canopy over the gas pumps should have a sloped roof and utilize the same
shingles. The support columns should be constructed of face brick much in the same
manner as the Super America Station on County Road #4 and Highway #5. Lighting on
the canopy should be recessed to minimize glare off-site.
The transition to the east is proposed with retaining walls and coniferous
plantings. The intensity and size of plantings will not provide adequate screening
until the plants have reached maturity some ten to fifteen years in the future. The
Io'37
Hidden Glen North 5 April 11, 1986
landscape plan should be supplemented with a six-foot high vertical, board on board
wood fence and jogged at appropriate intervals to offset the linearness of the
fence. Shade trees should be planted on the service side of between 31 to 4-inch
caliper. Conifers should be planted on the residential side between 14 to 16 feet
in height. The ground cover will stabilize the 2/1 slopes between the two-tiered,
four-foot high retaining walls, but needs shrubs to soften the view of the walls.
Attachment C indicates one way of providing a fence and plantings.
Internal circulation can be improved by shifting the pump islands approximately ten
feet to the west in order to maintain a minimum of 25 feet of clearance for
manuevering between cars at the pump and cars in permanent parking spaces.
The right-in/right-out access onto Townline Road should be removed. A preliminary
conversation with the County Highway Department has indicated that this access point
is a problem with sight vision distance and would be too close to the Dell Road
intersection.
Commercial Zoning Lot 19
No detailed plans have been submitted for review on this lot at this time. Zoning
to commercial in the future shall be based on the following criteria:
1. The commercial building must be residential in character with a pitched
roof, utilizing brick as the dominant building material and shingles on the
roof.
2. Parking shall be provided at a minimum of six spaces per 1,000 square feet
of Gross Floor Area (GFA).
3. Transition to the east and the south must have equal to, or better,
transition to the adjoining residential land use than Lot 20.
4. The commercial site shall use similar lighting standards.
Sidewalks/Trails
Sidewalks and trails should be constructed where shown on Attachment D.
Summary
The revised PUD is better than the previous PUD in the following ways:
1. The total number of housing units have been reduced from 147 to 117.
2. The transition between the multiple family land uses and the proposed R1-9.5
area is better but will still require a heavy vegetative buffer where shown
on Attachment A.
3. Transition between the R1-13.5 and R1-9.5 zoning districts is across the
rear lot line.
( 4. The commercial building has a residential character and transition to the
east will be acceptable with changes as recommended on Attachment C.
u �r
Hidden Glen North 6 April 11, 1986
5. The multiple family area has fewer units and smaller buildings. The plan
has more architectural variety and better curb appeal.
Approval of the commercial zoning and platting for Lot 20 would result in Lot 19
being approved as platted lot. This would require a street frontage and lot size
variance which could be granted under the PUO District Review. If Commission feels
that the Commercial use of this lot makes sense, the Guide Plan could be changed
from Low Density Residential to Commercial with PUO Concept approval. Zoning
approval would not to be granted until detailed site and architectural plans have
been submitted for review.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Staff would recommend approval of the request for Planned Unit Development
Amendment Review, Planned Unit Development District Review, with variances,
Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density
Residential and from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial, a Zoning
District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial, Rural to RM-2.5, Rural to R1-
9.5, and Rural to R1-13.5, and a Preliminary Plat of 50.2 acres, based on plans
dated March 28, 1986, and April 7, 1986, subject to the recommendations of the Staff
Report dated March 7, 1986, and April 11, 1986, and subject to the following
conditions:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Submit revised architectural plans which continue the same height
and sloped roof around the east side of the building on commercial
Lot 20.
B. Submit details of the canopy which include a sloped roof with
shingles, and brick columns.
C. Submit a revised landscape plan for the commercial lot which
includes a fence and plantings in a manner similar to Attachment C.
The fence shall be a six-foot minimum height, vertical board on
board, two-inch by six-inch construction, staggered, with 3.5-inch
to 4-inch caliper inch shade trees and 14 to 16-foot high conifers.
D. Submit a revised site plan which removes the right-in/right-out
access onto Townline Road and moves the gas pumps islands a minimum
of ten feet to the west for better internal circulation.
E. Submit a landscape plan for the residential portion of the project
providing a buffer between the multiple family and the single family
areas where shown on Attachment A. The landscape plan must also
continue the berming, fencing, and plantings along Highway #101 and
Townline Road consistent with Phase I and Phase II development.
F. Submit a revised zoning request for RM-6.5 zoning for the twinhome
area.
G. Submit a revised preliminary plat indicating sidewalks/trails where
shown on Attachment D.
los"J
Hidden Glen North 7 April 11, 1986
2. Prior to Final plat approval, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
C. Submit detailed storm water run-off, erosion control, and utility
plans for review by the City Engineer.
D. Submit for Hennepin County Highway Department and City Engineer a -
detailed construction plan for a temporary intersection improvement
at Dell Road, Highway #101, and Townline Road.
3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
B. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading.
C. Submit an overall signage plan with details with lettering to be of
a consistent size and style, internally lit, and individually
affixed to the building.
D. Submit an overall lighting plan with details with free-standing
lighting to be 20-foot maximum height, downcast cut-off luminars,
and lights under the pump island canopy should be recessed to
minimize off-site glare.
E. Submit plans for review by the Fire Marshal.
F. Submit samples of proposed exterior building materials for review.
G. Submit an architectural variety housing plan for the 9.5 and
twinhome areas in accordance with City policy that no two units be
alike side by side, opposite, or diagonally across from each other.
4. This project shall not proceed without the extension of Dell Road access
from the south.
5. Concurrent with road construction five-foot wide concrete sidewalks and an
eight-foot wide bituminous trails should be constructed where shown on
Attachment D.
1JAo
tl—
4,1.1 it r. t—A
L --I
o, 0 i er OP '
.•••r-% 1.,,I Ec%.
-C 6E10 .. INI
, sve, ••••411"" 01.Lyt'—
CITY OF CHANHASSEN '— -Cf3;
101 ''''''' . --- 1 I
i
1 tu 0.%* ii . --'''t
Wait Wait NM , Iniilt laiiiii
. : Ft :If: : cr .i Trierie,Z, ,
\1 ir Ir IIIA-411.1 ', I • 7ow ‘,
"si z4:13 e'D ' 43 ' g..4 4,11, , ff'' 4A. \-..1.•
• /
TON DRIVE •
•
•
. **, .- 1•t;/77 N,.,-,
I
32 1
N%. r /7Y , •V
SUNNY ALfao
3.,TFT.,:--1
1.11
.._:....... . ti-
.1011li N 11
,c • 10 , ,., .. co , , \.4 -1, - -4
J LH L±_: i T. ,..._
i F-1 .71 , r7-1--;1 •—=----, \ ,:.:"" ------ I\' ''' N 19 1.....—...‘''..-
Oali • ha•
a.' ILI '',i, •4_la ..., .ii;
11 i •'• al
C
`,,,_y___I ifs.. . c.:lic 1
.— -. --1
.,r a i , I 1'-6„ 1 [ •' OM L__ Ad. a • z 1 i . _7 . ki_71' 17±-----a> *-
% ( ll
_fl-...-- •-•..7-•-- f • • la r" -: 11:4•
Ex'
..1
__I_i .., I ), ,41 I F. ,.......7 -I '). I 111;;1111 1,- r z...0. _____.... .._, i_...--..._..-L.-_ : ...3,,.7411 , 4 0 1___,......x,____ : ..% \..._\
0 ° ITI,--1-1 4 . r r--:-; ,., - -' 2 -
11 , -1 ,. a i
'
4._
Lt caJ' ' ' ' ti.4.11. r, 11,
I i -,1 • n21
' 71'03-,—., 4 - —. 1
0 n i---_:_i_ _'" L.--",, - L t2 -j rn 7 to I : )
c, ----1 --, ..... , gi CD Mil .7 P.? r-4-,---1, - ........ 1.1, ar-=11"1
.,;.= 1-7 0 etc/ •
[.L e "A''14_ M,A1.1,tp:-._-,--•_ ..-_-......---..ai4, Maw' =7:•_
(----
... 'bs -
Polo i ..•] LI.--_--_,4_..-...., ;.. cs r, . , 1 —7
8 . .' i * 0 11....,n1"- - - I sio' -CN Q ` 1
.`N•;N,. , ••••=t-----1..v.i• ma' ,. .. iLwaL 1 fil ' ' . 4
t
Nj I 14. 1 tli 112 —• ,_ mar-------2_
, o 02 m - - . ------..
,, (c) , .._.:-.:. :-
> .... 3,040 . moj
%wit '....". " r x'.
—- r-s•-•s - •s"
C ts . ,
CO-.I 2 -ire . .Ai*
' r- 4:°>%04,
.'
_ *******
-I ,
" • I , \
, .'..a
-
•
, `, co -,
1
_-...,--",:._ ,A
...: a , r ..1: — > "". .. ,
A 1 q ••1 . 4, ' i 741 ' -
i
sw7. 7,1 : '•7:...":
e . ... _ .p.,.1,..,...!7 . Ir .,
_.• ......, ,i, , ,1 ,,,„ / 1 4
R
1 et < \ •4.\ ...,:Ili L7.ri,Li ,i:Lir-:i. t:_-_r 4—r ( - \ Q.,,....\._
BARINGTON ORME -,"4---P 2.,
,„, .,li
I I.j
i ,
.11")FbMc
-1 11 tii•r1rL:OISt r'ni,i 06,7.:,,[L VhW7IVtSi.....1T.i-.R.11 i1'-,E_i-171A4E4.4..T,74/'5ti_-F7.._5-,_-11,,,1 41-"5..11-1 t 1 l-i11-.‘1 4,1 1.14,,1.-/,1.LL,.,1i,1,..73LiI.--4-'_r 7•.,1,..„,,, 7,/ -\i,./i/e,A,:,i
i ' I .tb:7111• N .
; r a, / r
1
1- riP - I •1; ‘f.:c 13
„.., , r_--- -,, -
1_,. 5.,_j
--','i r -''-`?--,--er / , _j e' r... ...;
T.—
.
l' STRUT ti." fr:
‘. ,rr i woes...14' \....?1•;.::\,;2r...\ Iv l;-- 11! ''' r4...-7
I -----"'"-- ..--=--- ,
, 1
4•,- <r— i f...../ IP , 0 1 sr'' 4__
i _..
' 1 1 , ,, (..1 •
.1/,.... 5AsatircwtolotT .,/,/
• : 1 / ___1_---i ,\,\v,:) ,
- - %, - - ''4, _• ,:;---:,, ---z---: ... ...; pLEAsANTv..,,ROAD,.,.,'.:',..:,
Ask:\‘\\, \t. .
iI I' \
1 c\, ‘, :.,, <1'. ss,
, ,i .._.., 1 i -- -• . , A;
f-.----57- . ., ; F-1- \ 1
•, .
-I, , - \ ,it 1 I-----.4/ I / \%,._\
-L----1--I ---_-P2L_i r \
JOSEPH CURVE 'P\ '()‹!
- \-,... -‘ ' NN \, ,k ._ •_: :.
.
_,Ii \ „,--\' •r1/4--- •••,-
I i ' 7-7 1-----1-----1 11---I ---, i \\,•-" , \'\ \\.: -\„Yl4f,/,\
(
Multiple Family Area
10.4('''' ' Attachment B
08
11 — �
. ' vl
1"-- -% )) 1 \I\ 4
I. :0°I Ity 'Zip` • !i106.0"1 ti Ie.I •°- I* 0
• l 11 ' � I a
szrr. 1 16 [ 04 M
°.1'/ I
"7 1 I �`
CD
' 0-2 7 :i
CD
` , ' "!' a +
{ �,c5.q i 2ca �•Fr. 0 ,r 41
am
1
_ I : t.
I I • ;' •i'�J
f 122�9Z^..Fj,
�S
• _ , .
rt' ~►
ryes 01 1 j .4¢ 1�-to
91,.a1 1 Z0400 5R¢T• I N-t I •k . 3 W ', INN , , I tilt.. , piii 0*
•
CD
• Ics I.,
0 ir)
, ,„
„ ,
= =
,.,„.," ,
, ,
.. ii
,,,
•
_i
,I WI 1 1
1 II
m 46v rT }
i Fe„�1C --s _-
II
+•.a ( I a-•',.,
rE It
, IZ
y IS • 1'I
I Ia
h
� _ c 1 ' � i 1 I<;
j
•a"L :1'. I.W ,.0;� ' fJ J dw)' 15.a. ,-q4.yu
I
...— ,, .
-- HWY. 101
. • 4 :i 111
. si-
1 1' 1 . e;
v•To-
dsc". < %.7-'V:1:1117.1" ri:L...0'1"41 tl-r 4`•i• r''"4 1 \ 1
• 4.; fog
BARRINGTON DRIVE ,'^J.-J• ' '1:
-- I
' i 1-7-11"
r-T-77-lir i „ 171- .4 ....
0
. , '4t, A t
' / ../ .'1)`:.11:11 4 1 ' -4-14-45-‘ 1 / 11 . f 4 4' --'- .v ",,/, 1 ”412 al, Nolso 1 ,L_/, ,,,,,„„ ,04,0 • f, / f 47 II
/ •h- = 1 'L'1'Eli L-_,1 1 Li,l'7*- nr; . . . t \
..'4.: • t., II- -) • ,,..„ 1 ' '''
117 3Fillii731,11-
1
1...1—..L...1:... ....,L L., - I— - ..,../ , ' /1 )\ lis ••.,... -
• -- _--4-=., ,___J•L__J Li Liii___I Li L_J Lii Li Li,L.z../ 2°_,, ,..1 ,.„,\ )4 11
,r— , a-i ... i . 1 . - 1 ..
S lt
,1 -= ,. ------. 1743ET"n--`13-7-‘----,..., ,____I,—...„b/ eo, 'I...:._: . v-
.. 'L1-9-111.? - ' ' I ' 2. I -7--r • z.., - - 0 .i 0,30.. ,,---I ,
2' )---t----" g flrflial rill'5174-14Lilj •t 1 9' --07
i.
,r, zr:j1.71 A r 1....,1.....) . 1...„)...,I....,11, .1(4 ,.... 1,,,,,,i /AO •-r-,,—,--,11".; 1.1\ .;;.w•• /:
,,,, ,. _ ..; Iz' ;___I 1.-...1 L-.1;L-1.1_,,%;--4--ill... ,L , / ,K• , i 1,---mir,,'...., >:- t:
''' tr 1 g - - •_4',•_(.,•_,-
I Vali 1,7-107sil hilili4,4113,,m,12-7•1---: 3, ' c_.'17 -. '-` ugl-
,. ji."7 40 , -.- 1--- •• 1--"v\i. p.
1_
I, ) .1_,„.2.1.;.1 fa,ri-7 IF:1--,,ijn g Ft i'92.; // .,.. LI t...f L,..,,1' i: 1 : ....,T,„•,' i
f.--1---:----71 1-17CL''.-:-7.-j-\\-1 :5"/ g ' ;', *I ---4-,-,1,7- , , ' •°-
' ,_L--' 1'. 1-1-.\ Ac\.-.7-_•.•-•\;A,\-J,_. 10X/173 i ' rtr-i_--7 -' -' l'\ '1°
,r,--51,, • t":"\------ At., - • - - • '1---/ , - Fil- 7 i:1 i',„\-m,
—1.--42....=— X\__\--,..-4,\....•• 1 1--_
-
t it3•-,i-,--i1'1,ti1 i'‘:,-_-,,:.I.:z.l./7iii-<.7,4,..-I/7."„71--.•1ivL\)1).0'1'7',')A.'.,',))l1,,i,..",.,,/,1 4,f1-,..'4,.L../.k41\''''\
\L'
L _l _ .i : L
PLEASANTVIEWROAD ) • . \ \
-\..
LEASAHTV
'Il
-'17.-7----7---t-..--1-----1---7 n—rT-i r-----1.---- , . ' ..,, ,,
--, ', 1 1 1 ,041 / i 1! .\ \ 1 ,\ '': :.
/..._ - ) . N ' '!`'•'/ . .
-r \ \ 1 • : :A:‘,‘, \, . ...
i I —L--/ \\I?\ 1
- c•`• I
r 0 _1 _i___1_ efiL_I • ...4 ...__. '...‹.--:._...„1
-...._40°/' JOSEPH CURVE-j ---1)..,....------\\ 10,.,\ L':;‹,/ '''''L,' •s\,.‘.?:',..-.". .,---::-:. -6:-
---<
•
Overall Pedestrian Plan
I
ICLOI Attachment D
C (
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: March 7, 1986
PROJECT: Hidden Glen North
LOCATION: Southeast quadrant of Highway #101 and Townline Road
APPLICANT: Derrick Land Company
FEE OWNER: Roger Derrick and Joseph Dolejsi
REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Amendment Review on 130.25 acres.
2. Planned Unit Development District Review, with variances on
50.2 acres, with variances for street frontage and lot size.
3. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density
Residential to Medium on 10.95 acres, and from Low Density
q Residential to Neighborhood Commercial on 3.45 acres.
4. Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial
on 3.45 acres, Rural to RM-2.5 on 10.95 acres, Rural to R1-
9.5 on 15.8 acres, and Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.9 acres.
5. Preliminary Plat of 50.2 acres into 63 single family lots,
two outlots, and road right-of-way.
/1
Background — +• — �+
IIP
This site is currently guided Low : ...
�•��� !T\
Density Residential for up to 2.5 40) 4 PROPOSE SITE
units per acre. The Guide Plan �♦4. 4 /
depicts surrounding land uses as Low ,'♦'♦ \
Density Residential and Open Space I / \
to the east, Low Density Residential 1i 41p,
.6l�
to the south, Low Density Residen- j w'•', ,�'
tial to the west in Chanhassen, and �-",i =
Low to Medium Density Residential in _ �. 'Y
Minnetonka to the north. This site '��
is currently zoned Rural. ,,
This site is part of the Purgatory Merl"), _%
Creek Master Plan. The entire . • - 4
Planned Unit Development (PUD) area , Al---! i 1 I .n�
AREA LOCATION MAP
►OLDS
C
Hidden Glen North 2 March 7, 1986
is within the transitional zone of the Master Plan. Land area to the east of Dell
Road below the 920 contour elevation is in the Conservancy Zone. The Director of
Community Services has reviewed this and indicated that, since the City already owns
in excess of 100 acres near this area adjacent to the slopes, additional land may
not be needed. He also recommended that land area within the 100-year flood plain
be dedicated. This is in the extreme southeast corner of the proposed R1-13.5 Zone
at about elevation 880. Conservancy easements should be established across the back
of Lots 1, 7, 8, 9, and 10 south of Barrington Drive. The dominant characteristic
of Purgatory Creek in this portion of the community is the large marsh floodplain
area, a good portion of which is currently owned by the City.
This site is part of a 19B3 PUO for Hidden Glen involving 104 acres. Approximately
26 acres of land has been added to the PUD in the northeast portion of the site.
The 1983 PUD was based on a total of 253 units (195 single family, 58 multiple
family) at an overall density of 2.5 units per acre. The 1983 PUD had no commercial
areas proposed and the multiple site along Townline Road and Highway #101 was
envisioned for RM-6.5 zoning. Only the first two phases of Hidden Glen were
approved for zoning and platting into R1-8.5 and R1-13.5 lots. Conceptual approval
was granted for the PUD for single family and multiple family uses; however, no
specific densities were assigned to either area.
Comprehensive Guide Plan
The change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan is requested from Low Density Residential
to Neighborhood Commercial on 3.45 acres, and from Low Oensity Residential to Medium
Density Residential on 10.95 acres. The use of medium density residential on this
site may be appropriate as a transition between lower density residential uses and
Highway #101. The use of multiple family residential on this site also provides a
variety of housing types and lifestyle choices. Although the density of the project
on a gross acreage basis is 5.41 units per acre, and on a net acreage basis is 7.6
units per acre, if density is considered in conjunction with the total 130-acre PUD,
the density of the residential portion is 2.5 units per acre. This is consistent
with the 1983 PUD for the site.
A Neighborhood Commercial site in this location may be appropriate considering there
are no neighborhood commercial uses within a one-mile area of the site. The
Comprehesnive Guide Plan contemplates twelve Neighborhood Commercial areas around
the community, to be located based upon community need. The size of the site is
3.45 acres and the intensity of site development proposed is indicated by the Floor
Area Ratio of 0.13.
Planned Unit Development Concept
The Hidden Glen North PUO shows a variety of land uses including R1-9.5 single
family lots, R1-13.5 single family lots, townhouses, and a neighborhood commercial
area. The PUD proposes a total of 147 housing units which includes 53 units to be
zoned R1-9.5, 10 units to be zoned R1-13.5, and 84 units to be zoned RM-2.5 units.
The density of the Hidden Glen North PUO overall is 3.14 units per acre based on
46.75 acres. If 4.3 acres of proposed right-of-way dedication for Highway #101 and
Townline Road is not included in the density calculation, the density is 3.46 units
per acre. The overall density of the Hidden Glen North PUD Amendment and the 1983
PUD is 2.5 units per acre. This density does not include the 3.45-acre commercial
site, or the 11.12-acre Park in Hidden Glen Phase II. The density of the single
family portion of Hidden Glen North is 2.34 units per acre based on 26.98 acres
Ridden Glen North 3 March 7, 1986
(
which includes approximately 5.3 acres of road right-of-way. The density of the
lots proposed for R1-9.5 zoning based on approximately 21 acres of land is 2.5 units
per acre. The density of the proposed multiple family area based on 15.25 gross
acres is 5.51 units per acre. If the road right-of-way for Highway #101 and
Townline Road is excluded, the density is 7.67 units per acre.
The proposed arrangement and mixture of housing types on this site may be
appropriate for two reasons: One, the proposed multiple family site provides a
transition between Highway #101 and the lower density single family land uses in the
southeast portion of the site; and, two, it contributes to a mixture of housing
variety and lifestyle choices.
The proposed building setback between multiple units and the adjacent R1-9.5 rear
lot lines is, on the average, only 30 feet. Considering the size of the multiple
family buildings (primarily four and six units) a 30-foot dimension is not wide
enough to provide a physical transition between the larger multiple unit buildings
and the smaller single family homes. Since the arrangement of buildings is tight,
the site plan cannot be redesigned to provide a greater setback area without a
reduction in density.
Proponents show an R1-13.5 District on the south side of Barrington Drive, with an
R1-9.5 District proposed on the north side. Although the street frontages are
comparable, there is quite a difference in lot depth and lot size. There are also
different setbacks between 25 feet (R1-13.5) and 15 feet (R1-9.5). A better way to
provide a transition between the zoning districts would be across the rear lot line.
This can be accomplished by eliminating one lot on the north side of Barrington
Drive and rezoning Lots 1-8 from R1-9.5 to R1-13.5.
A 3.45-acre Neighborhood Commercial site is proposed in the northeast corner of the
PUD. Although a Neighborhood Commercial use seems appropriate in this location
since neighborhood shopping facilities are non-existent within one mile of this
site, there are transition problems with the adjoining residential properties. The
30-foot setback between the commercial site and the R1-9.5 site to the south is too
small and does not provide enough room for berming and plantings to provide an
adequate transition. The 4D-foot buffer space to the east of the site, though
larger, has a 3/1 downslope to the east of approximately 12 feet in height. The
single row of plantings proposed at the top of the slope will not provide an
adequate transition. The transition to the west is better since the 8D-foot of
right-of-way for Dell Road can be used as a space buffer; however, it will be
necessary to construct maximum berm heights within a 35-foot front yard setback and
plant heavily with conifers. Since the site plan for the commercial area meets the
minimum setback and parking requirements, it appears that the only way to provide a
better transition to the east and the south would be downsize the intensity of the
development.
The extension of Dell Road from its present terminus south of the site to Highway
eTownline Road is proposed as part of the Hidden Glen North PUD. The County's
preliminary design for the intersection of Dell Road, Townline Road, and Highway
#101 is shown as Exhibit 4. The County's capital improvement program proposes the
upgrading of this intersection in 1988. Until that time, there would be problems at
the existing road intersection. Until the construction is completed by the County,
Dell Road should not connect to Townline Road and Highway #101, meaning that the
Neighborhood Commercial and multiple family phases should not be approved for zoning
until that construction is completed. Another way to approach the intersection
C
Hidden Glen North 4 March 7, 1986
access would be for the proponent to design an interim solution providing a
temporary access until the road is upgraded.
Utilities can be extended to this site. Water will be extended from the south along
existing Dell Road and sewer will have to be extended from an existing trunk line
approximately 1,300 feet to the east of the site. The PUD Concept Plan shows a way
in which a sewer line could be extended through the property to the east and at the
same time provide preliminary road layout. The sewer line is proposed to follow a
road layout which would allow for this site to be developed for either single, or
multiple family, land uses. The Comprehensive Guide Plan currently depicts adjacent
land use as Low Density Residential.
Commercial Zoning and Platting
The area proposed for Neighborhood Commercial zoning is 3.45 acres in size and
proposed to be platted into two lots. The southern lot, Lot 20, does not meet the
minimum dimensional and lot size requirement for Neighborhood Commercial zoning.
The concept indicates a building size of 19,500 square feet. A total of 159 parking
spaces is shown. City Code, at eight spaces per 1,D00, would require a total of 156
parking spaces. Building and parking areas meet the minimum setback requirements
for Neighborhood Commercial zoning.
Currently, specific detailed site and architectural plans are not available.
Because of this, Staff would recommend that the zoning and platting not be approved
at this time. As mentioned in the PUD section, there is not adequate area between
the properties to the east and the south to provide for proper transition to the
adjoining residential land uses. This means that the intensity (floor area ratio)
of the commercial development may be too high and may need to be downsized.
Criteria for the development of the Neighborhood Commercial site at the time of
zoning should include architectural plans which are residential in scale and
character, screening of mechanical units, maximum berming and plantings along
property lines to provide transition and to screen parking areas, and lighting
standards which are 2D-foot high downcast and residential in character.
R1-9.5 Zoning and Platting
As mentioned in the PUD section, 53 lots on approximately 21 acres are proposed at a
gross density of 2.5 units per acre. Lots 3-6, Block 3, and Lots 10-12, Block 6, do
not meet the minimum street frontage requirement for R1-9.5 zoning. Due to the
unusual configuration of lots in Block 6 and the minimum adjacent lot frontages for
lots in Block 3, it does not appear that the plat can be redesigned to adjust the
lot line without the result of a loss in lots.
R1-9.5 zoning is proposed on the north side of Barrington Drive opposite R1-13.5
zoning on the south side. The transition between the different zoning districts
should be across the rear lot lines and Lots 1-8, Block 6, should be rezoned to R1-
13.5. This will require the elimination of one lot.
The proponent will be required to submit a housing plan keying specific unit types
to specific lots in the R1-9.5 district such that no two units are alike, side by
side, or diagonally across from each other.
C C
Hidden Glen North 5 March 7, 1986
R1-13.5 Zoning and Platting
All proposed lots in Block 5 meet the minimum dimensional square footage and street
frontage requirements for R1-13.5 zoning.
RM-2.5 Zoning and Platting
A total of 84 townhome units are proposed on Outlot A and B at a gross density of
5.4 units per acre and a net density of 7.6 units per acre, if road right-of-way for
Highway #101 is excluded. The arrangement of the townhomes is tight. The setback
dimension between buildings is approximately 30 feet. This does not leave much room
for landscaping and berming to help break up the views of the buildings and downplay
the visual impact of building mass along the frontage of Street E. In addition,
buildings are setback only 30 feet from the adjoining R1-9.5 District which does not
provide an adequate transition. Landscaping should only be used to supplement a
buffer since plant materials grow to varying heights, and the size of proposed plant
materials at time of planting will leave large gaps for at least 15 to 20 years.
There are several ways to provide transition including increased setback area,
substantial berming between 10 to 15 feet in height, heavy use of coniferous
plantings, fewer units, and smaller buildings. The solution to the lack of
transition will likely be a combination of the above factors.
If the proposed right-of-way for Highway #101 is to be dedicated with the project,
the land area could be included in the calculation in density meaning that the gross
density for the project would be approximately 5.4 units per acre and this site
could be zoned RM-6.5.
Parking areas are required to be screened per Ordinance. Where buildings are
perpendicular to the street, it will be possible to screen parking. When the
buildings are at angles, or parallel to the street, there is not enough green area
between the curb line and the parking areas to provide berming and plantings to
screen the parking areas. Two garage spaces are provided for each unit, but the
spaces do not meet the 10 ft. by 20 ft. required dimension. The average dimension
of these spaces is 8.5 ft. by 17 ft. The overflow parking (14 spaces) is in the
front yard setback.
The total caliper inch requirement for a project of this size, based on an average
unit size with a garage of 2,000 sq. ft. is 520 caliper inches. A total of 595
caliper inches are provided on the landscape plan. Additional berming and
landscaping is necessary to provide an adequate transition to the R1-9.5 lots, and
provide a better transition to Highway #101.
Architectural plans and elevations for the six-unit building have been submitted.
The proponent has indicated to Staff that the two and four-unit buildings are the
same as the six-unit building, but on a smaller scale. The buildings can be
described architecturally as having a residential character with the use of varied
rooflines, building projections, and dormers. However, since the majority of
buildings are four and six-unit structures, the size and length of the buildings
collectively contributes to a massive-looking appearance. The site plan would
benefit from an introduction of more two-unit buildings.
Utilities
The preliminary utility plan indicates how sewer and water service can be provided
iO1t1�
C t
Hidden Glen North 6 March 7, 1986
to this site. Water service will come from the existing water lines in Dell Road to
the south of the project. Sanitary sewer must be extended from a trunk sewer line,
running parallel with the site approximately 1,50D feet to the east. Two alignments
are proposed for sewer connection, the northerly alignment follows a possible road
location which depicts how this site could be served by roads in the future. There
is an alternate alignment for a sewer connection which would not follow the road
alignment, but would be a shorter route to go.
In concept, storm water is proposed to drain in an easterly direction towards the
large floodplain marsh area along Purgatory Creek. No detailed storm water run-off
plans have been provided at this time.
Parks, Open Space, and Trails
Phase II of Hidden Glen included an 11.12-acre neighborhood park. Dell Road will
have an eight-foot wide bituminous trail on one side of the street and a five-foot
concrete sidewalk on the other side of the street. Considering the number of
townhome units proposed, it would be appropriate to have a five-foot wide concrete
sidewalk connection to Dell Road along Street E.
Conclusions
In general, the location and mixture of land uses proposed in the PUD appears to be
appropriate, due to the variety of housing and a need for neighborhood commercial
uses. There are, however, transitional problems between multiple family and single
family uses, between commercial and residential land use, and between proposed R1-
13.5 and R1-9.5 Zoning Districts.
Although the overall residential density of the project is 2.5 units per acre, it
appears that too much of the density is located in too small of an area in the
northwest corner of the project. Given the tightness of the multiple family
residential site plan and the small size of the R1-9.5 lots, it does not appear that
there is a physical way to rearrange the plan to address the problems of transition,
street frontages, and lot sizes as identified above, without a reduction in density.
If the Commission feels that the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change has been
substantiated and that, in general, the type and arrangement in land uses proposed
within the PUD makes sense, then one option would be to return the development plans
to the proponent for revisions which include but are not limited to the following:
1. All RI-9.5 lots to meet the minimum street frontage requirement of 70 feet.
2. Change Block 6, Lot 1-8, from R1-9.5 to R1-13.5 zoning.
3. A different site plan for the multiple area which provides for more open space between the buildings, greater setback areas to the R1-9.5 lots, a
landscape plan which meets the minimum size requirements per Ordinance, and
substantial berming and landscaping along Highway #101 adjacent to the R1-
.9.5 lots and between commercial and residential uses. pj
4. Zoning for the neighborhood commercial site including Lots 20 and 21, should
not be approved at this time until detailed site and architectural plans are
available for review.
13
f (
Hidden Glen North 7 March 7, 1986
5. Submit a housing plan keying specific unit types to lots in the R1-9.5
District, such that no two units are alike side by side, opposite, or
diagonally across from each other.
6. Submit a detailed plan to show how portions of the project would be
developed over time. Since the upgrading of the intersection of Dell Road,
Highway #101, and Townline Road is not planned until 1988, the townhouse
portion and the Neighborhood Commercial portion should not be zoned or
platted until the road upgrading occurs or the proponent should to submit
for Staff and County review an interim solution, which illustrates how Dell
Road would work with the existing road intersection.
7. Submit a detailed storm water run-off plan.
8. Revise architectural plans to provide for 10 ft. by 20 ft. stalls in the
garages and removing all parking from the front yard setback.
9. This project shall not be allowed to proceed without the extension of Dell
Road from the south to provide for access.
If the Commission feels that the proponent has not adequately substantiated the
request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change, and that the proposed arrangement of
land uses as depicted by the PUD is not acceptable, then the Commission may choose
to recommend denial of the request as submitted.
{
IOs
MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
Monday, April 21, 1986
School Board Meeting Room
7:3D p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Ed Schuck, Rich Anderson, Christine Dodge (8:45
p.m.), Robert Hallett, Charles Ruebling
MEMBERS ABSENT: Julianne Bye, Virginia Gartner
STAFF PRESENT: Chris Enger, Director of Planning; Michael Franzen, Senior
Planner; Kate Karnas, Administrative Assistant
Pledge of Allegiance--Roll Call
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION:
Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Ruebling, to adopt the agenda as
printed.
Motion carried--4-0-0
II. MEMBERS REPORTS
None.
III. MINUTES
MQTION 1:
Motion was made by Anderson, seconded by Hallett, to adopt the minutes of
the March 10, 1986, Planning Commission meeting as printed.
Motion carried--4-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Anderson, to adopt the minutes of
the March 24, 1986, Planning Commission meeting as printed.
Motion carried--4-O-0
IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
A. HIDDEN GLEN 4TH, by Derrick Land Company. Request for Planned Unit
Development Concept Amendment on 130.25 acres, Planned Unit
Development District Review, with variances on 50.2 acres, with
Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial on 2.10
acres, Rural to RM-6.5 on .10.95 acres, Rural to R1-9.5 on 22.72
Planning Commission Minutes 2 April 21, 1986
acres, Rural to R1-13.5 on 8.13 acres, Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential
on 10.95 acres, and from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood
Commercial on 3.45 acres, Preliminary Plat of 50.2 acres into 119
lots, one outlot, and road right-of-way Location: Southeast
quadrant of Highway #101 and Townline Road. A continued public
hearing.
Mr. Don Patton, representing proponent, explained the changes which had been
made to the development proposal since the last meeting. He noted that the
northwest area of the property was now shown for development as duplex
units, instead of townhouses. Mr. Patton stated that proponents would like
to continue to work with the City Staff with respect to the final details
for the location of sidewalks and alignment of the intersection of County
Road 62 (Crosstown)/Dell Road/Highway #101.
Planner Franzen reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff
Report of April 11, 1986. He presented Staff concerns regarding sight
vision distance and closeness of access points along the major roads at the
perimeter of the site, in particular County Road 62, Dell Road, and Highway
#101.
With respect to the sidewalks, Planner Franzen stated that there was
adequate space within the road right-of-way of the proposed streets to
(.• accommodate sidewalks throughout the development. He added that this phase
of Hidden Glen was to be connected to the previous phases of Hidden Glen via
Barrington Drive; however, a question still remained as to whether the City,
or the proponent, would pay for the sidewalk connection between the two
phases.
Anderson asked about the size of proposed Lot 19, shown as future commercial
development. He questioned how the development of this parcel could be
controlled if the lot was "undersized" at this time. Planner Franzen
explained that the minimum size of a commercial area was required to be two
acres, with minimum lot width of 200 feet. He stated that the site was 0.19
acre short of the two-acre minimum requirement, and 11 feet short of the
minimum lot width requirement, which was not considered significant, given
the Planned Unit Development request and the overall benefit to the
neighborhood, along with the required amount of right-of-way required for
the thoroughfares planned through and at the perimeter of the property.
Planner Franzen stated that the City would maintain a great deal of control
as to the final development of this site, as any plans would require review
by the Planning Commission and Council, and a developer's agreement would
also be drafted for the parcel.
Hallett asked why the sidewalks were not proposed to continue all the way to
the commercial portion of the development. Planner Franzen responded that
this was the preferred route. He noted that this would require the sidewalk
to be located along the street proposed for duplexes and that, after
consideration of the amount of traffic that would be present because of the
additional traffic in the duplex area and because of the number of driveways
which would cross the sidewalks in the duplex area, it was determined that
this would be the less desirable and less safe route for sidewalks. Planner
Enger stated that City Staff had determined that sidewalks in duplex areas
o63
Planning Commission Minutes 3 April 21, 1966
did not work well unless the front yard setback was increased by ten feet
due to the reasons stated. Hallett stated that he would not be opposed to
having sidewalks located along the entire length of Barrington Drive.
Ruebling asked about the required front yard setback for duplex units.
Planner Enger stated that it was 3D ft. as a minimum. He noted that it may
be possible to maintain a 40 ft. setback in this area in order to allow for
the sidewalks along the entire length of Barrington Drive. Ruebling stated
that he would prefer that the sidewalks be located along the entire length
of Barrington Drive. He added that he felt the sidewalks, if located
through the duplex area, would serve a greater number of residents where
more safety was needed with the greater number of trips generated by a
duplex development. Anderson concurred.
Ruebling asked about the recommendations for additional landscaping.
Planner Franzen explained that there were two major functions for the
landscaping on this site: one, to meet minimum City Code requirements for
screening; and, two, to provide transition between differing uses. Planner
Franzen explained where these functions were to take place on the plan.
Mr. Bob Kruell, 6780 Tartan Curve, expressed concern about the commercial
area proposed for this development. He stated that it had not be shown in
the original plan presented for Hidden Glen and asked that it be taken out
of the plan at this time. Mr. Roger Derrick, proponent, stated that this
property had not been included in the original Planned Unit Development for
Hidden Glen, but had been acquired since that time.
Mr. Frank Muelken, attorney, representing the Jacques family, asked what
considerations had been given to the "exception" parcel in the northeast
portion of the property. Mr. Patton explained the current situation
regarding access to the parcel given the proposed intersection of Dell Road
and Highway #1D1 at the northeast corner of the parcel. He explained that
the grades of the road, as well as the final location of the intersection,
would have significant impact upon the Jacques property. However, these
decisions were to be made by the County and State. Mr. Derrick discussed
the various alternatives for access to the Jacques property once the
intersection was completed.
Hallett asked if the Jacques family would be assessed for the construction
of Dell Road. Mr. Derrick responded that the Jacques would not be assessed,
that all the assessments were on the Hidden Glen property. Hallett added
that he felt the best possible situation would be to combine the Jacques
property with the Hidden Glen 4th development.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Ruebling, to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried--4-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Anderson, to recommend to the City
I u:34
Planning Commission Minutes 4 April 21, 1986
Council approval of the request of Derrick Land Company for Planned Unit
Development Concept Amendment on 130.25 acres, for Hidden Glen 4th Addition,
based on revised plans dated April 10, 1986, subject to the recommendations
of the Staff Reports dated March 7, and April 11, 1986, with direction to
Staff to explore the possibility of extension of sidewalks along Barrington
Drive for inclusion in the development for purposes of pedestrian access to
the commercial area and provision of safety for the residents, prior to City
Council review.
Motion carried--4-0-0
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Anderson, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Derrick Land Company for Comprehensive
Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial
for 3.45 acres and Planned Unit Development District Review on 50.2 acres
and Zoning District Change, with variances, on 2.10 acres from Rural to
Neighborhood Commercial for Hidden Glen 4th Addition, based on revised plans
dated April 10, 1986, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Reports
dated March 7, and April 11, 1986.
Motion carried--4-0-D
MOTION 4:
Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Ruebling, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Derrick Land Company for Comprehensive
Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density
Residential for 15.95 acres and Planned Unit Development District Review and
Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 for 22.72 acres, from Rural to
R1-13.5 for 8.13 acres, and from Rural to RM-6.5 for 15.95 acres, for Hidden
Glen 4th Addition, based on revised plans dated April 10, 1986, subject to
the recommendations of the Staff Reports dated March 7, and April 11, 1986,
with direction to Staff to explore the possibility of extension of sidewalks
along Barrington Drive for inclusion in the development for purposes of
pedestrian access to the commercial area and provision of safety for the
residents, prior to City Council review.
Motion carried--4-0-0
MOTION 5:
Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Ruebling, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Derrick Land Company for Preliminary Plat
of 50.2 acres into 65 lots two outlots and road right-of-way, for Hidden
Glen 4th Addition, based on revised plans dated April 10, 1986, subject to
the recommendations of the Staff Reports dated March 7, and April 11, 1986,
with direction to Staff to explore the possibility of extension of sidewalks
along Barrington Drive for inclusion in the development for purposes of
pedestrian access to the commercial area and provision of safety for the
residents, prior to City Council review.
Motion carried--4-0-0
JOSS
Dlanninn rnmmiccinn Minntnc 7 March 10. 1986
C. HIDDEN GLEN NORTH, by Derrick Land Company. Request for Planned
Unit Development Concept Amendment on 130.25 acres; Planned Unit
Development District Review, with variances, on 50.2 acres and
Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial on 3.45
acres, Rural to RM-2.5 on 10.95 acres, Rural to R1-9.5 on 15.8
acres, Rural to RM-13.5 on 5.9 acres; Comprehehensive Guide Plan
Amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential
on 10.95 acres, and from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood
Commercial on 3.45 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 50.2 acres into 65
lots, two outlots, and road right-of-way. Location: Southeast
quadrant of Highway #101 and Townline Road. A public hearing.
Mr. Tim Erkkila, representing proponent, reviewed the history of the
proposed development from its initial review as a Planned Unit Development
in 1984 to the present. Mr. Erkkila explained the transitioning of the uses
from single family, to multiple family, to neighborhood commercial uses in
the northern portion of the property. He also explained the location of
proposed Dell Road and its intersection with Townline Road and Highway #101.
Mr. Erkkila discussed the transition between the proposed R1-13.5 and R1-9.5
lots along Barrington Drive. He also discussed the transition between the
single family area and the proposed neighborhood commercial development to
the north.
Mr. Erkkila raised the question of whether the City would allow lot widths
at the street frontage on a "tight" radius to be the same as those for cul-
de-sacs, instead of the required length. He noted that the lot widths at
the building setbacks would meet, or exceed, City Code requirements. Mr.
Erkkila showed an example of a "tight" radius in the proposed development.
Mr. Erkkila reviewed the grading and utility plans for the development, and
noted the specific areas where existing trees would be saved, or removed, as
a result of construciton.
With respect to the proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan change to allow for
development of the neighborhood commercial area, Mr. Erkkila stated that the
City's plan indicated that twelve such neighborhood commercial areas would
be allowed within the community. The locations for these areas was not set,
but it was intended that the locations be determined based upon need in any
particular neighborhood. Mr. Erkkila pointed out that there were no other
commercial facilities within one mile of this property.
Regarding the intersection of Highway #1D1 and Dell Road, Mr. Erkkila
reviewed the details of the design and the proposed turning lanes which
would be incorporated into the intersection for safety and easy flow of
traffic. He noted that this interesection/y would eventually be signalized,
�VJ(o
Planning Commission Minutes 8 March 10, 1986
adding that the proposal was for this road to be constructed in Spring, or
Sumner, 1986. Mr. Erkkila stated that, due to the location of this
thoroughfare, the developers were proposing multiple residential development
at the very northwest corner of the property.
Planner Franzen reviewed the findings and conclusions of the Staff Report of
March 7, 1986. He stated that the development provided for a variety of
land uses, as well as variety of housing types and lot sizes, both of which
were desirable qualities. He added that the idea of neighborhood commercial
in this area seemed appropriate, as well. Planner Franzen noted that, while
the overall density of the development seemed to be consistent with the
original Planned Unit Development for the property, it appeared that too
much of the density was concentrated into one area of the property, causing
the majority of Staff's concerns about the proposed development. He
discussed the need for better transition between the R1-13.5 and R1-9.5
single family lots and between the single family area and the proposed
neighborhood commercial area.
Planner Franzen stated that Staff was also concerned about the timing of the
project with respect to the construction of Dell Road and completion of the
intersection of Dell Road with Highway #101.
Hallett asked if Highway #101 would be constructed as a four-lane road in
this area. Planner Enger responded that it was planned as a two-lane road
at this time. Hallett asked if Townline Road, which coincided with Highway
#101 in the vicinity of its location with Dell Road, would be a four-lane
road. Planner Enger responded that it was planned as a two-lane road and
scheduled for construction in 1988.
Gartner stated that she felt the proposed neighborhood commerical was
appropriate for this area. She added that she was not convinced that the
proposed townhomes were appropriate for this development, however.
Hallett stated that he, too, supported the idea of neighborhood commercial
for this area. He expressed concern regarding the screening of the
neighborhood commercial and the amount of acreage proposed for the use.
Hallett stated that he felt the development should meet the minimum
requirements of the Neighborhood Commercial District. Hallett asked about
the proposal for a day care center within this commercial area.
Planner Franzen stated that a day care center would be an allowed use. He
noted that Staff was more concerned about the intensity of the development
in terms of the parking availability and meeting setbacks in order to
provide for proper transition from the commercial development to the
residential portions of the property.
Bye stated that she supported the idea of neighborhood commercial for this
development. She added that she concurred with Staff's concerns regarding
transition.
Gartner stated that she felt the lots within the development should all meet
the minimum requirements for zoning districts proposed. She asked about the
letter included in the packets from Mrs. Elaine Jacques regarding access to
the exception lot near the northeast portion of the property. The letter
WS')
Planning Commission Minutes 9 March 10, 1986
discussed the need for provision of appropriate access to .this exception
parcel owned by the Jacques family. Alternatives for access to this parcel
were discussed.
Hallett asked if the proponents had considered purchasing the exception
parcel from the Jacques family. Mr. Roger Derrick, proponent, stated that
offers he had made to the Jacques family in the past had been turned down by
them.
Hallett stated that he felt the site, as proposed, would be too intensely
developed and concurred with the concerns of the Staff in the report of
March 7, 1986. He asked how many units would be lost if the townhouse area
was developed as duplexes, instead. Mr. Erkkila responded that it would
result in approximately 20 units less than the proposed townhouses. Hallett
stated that he felt the proponents should consider less density in this
area.
Hallett expressed concern about the need for single family residents to
cross through the multiple family area in order to obtain access to the
thoroughfares in the area, including Highway #101 and Townline Road.
Planner Enger stated that Staff had been working with proponents for some
time on this proposed development. To date, Staff had not seen any plans
for alternatives to the townhouse development, such as the plans for
duplexes, manor homes, or even single family, as mentioned by the developer.
He noted that the alternatives Staff had recommended did not eliminate as
many as 20 units from the development. Planner Enger added that Staff was
concerned about such a potentially large inventory of R1-9.5 lots in this
area, as well, with respect to repetition of unit types.
Mr. Dick Feerick, representing the Dolesji family, owners of the property,
expressed their concern for commencement of work on the property as soon as
possible.
Mr. Derrick stated that the engineers for the project had only developed the
alternative plans for the northwest portion of the site on the day of the
meeting. He added that the proponents did not want the density only for the
sake of having more units on the property, but that they would prefer to
have a plan which represented good planning and provided a good neighborhood
for the City. Mr. Derrick asked about the potential for variance being
granted to the amount of street frontage required on lots located on a
"tight" radius.
Mr. Bob Kruell, 6780 Tartan Curve, expressed concern about the inclusion of
Neighborhood Commercial in this area. and also expressed concern about the
number of units proposed.
Mr. Scott Jacques, 18801 Townline Road, stated that he was unaware of any
proposals by Derrick Land Company for purchase of their property (the
exception parcel located near the proposed intersection of Highway #101 and
Dell Road). Mr. Jacques stated that his main concern with respect to the
access for this exception lot would be the final grades of the property and
the relationship of the grades of the Hidden Glen property to theirs. He
stated that he did not want the homestead to "stick out." Mr. Derrick
(kg
Planning Commission Minutes 10 March 10, 1986
stated that the final grades would be dependent upon the final alignment of
Highway #101 and Dell Road at their intersection near the Jacques property.
He noted that one of the alternatives would place the home at an elevation
eight feet higher than the road. Mr. Derrick stated that no matter what the
final grades, proper access would be provided.
Mr. Phillip Luther, 18790 Harrogate Drive, stated that he felt more trees
would be lost with grading that was represented by the development plan. He
stated that he did not feel there was a need for any neighborhood commercial
use in this area, and listed several stores which, in his opinion, were
close enough to the neighborhood to provide service. Mr. Luther also
expressed concern regarding the proposal for variance to the R1-9.5 lot
frontages. He stated that he did not feel this should be approved. Mr.
Luther stated that felt the hilly nature of the land should be preserved and
that he felt single family units would be more appropriate in the northwest
portion of the property. He asked that any multiple units for the
development be owned and not allowed to be rental units.
Mr. Erkkila responded to the question of trees being removed, noting the
areas on the grading plan for preservation.
Chairman Schuck stated that he felt the Staff should have an opportunity to
review the alternative plans for the northwest portion of the property.
Hallett stated that he concurred.
Gartner stated that she was concerned that the R1-9.5 lots would be
supporting expensive houses. She stated that the intention of the smaller
lot size was to provide for less expensive housing in Eden Prairie.
Ruebling stated that he felt the neighborhood commercial area should meet
all the minimum requirements of the City Code. He expressed concern about
the density of the multiple family area in the northwest portion of the
property. He stated that he would be interested in the alternatives for
development of this area referred to by the proponents.
8ye stated that she concurred with the concerns noted in the Staff Report.
She stated that she felt the Staff and developer had adequate direction from
the Commission and suggested that the matter be returned to the Commission
at a later date after the developer had made revisions to the plan and the
Staff had had an opportunity to review the revisions. Anderson concurred.
Mr. Erkkila asked if it would be appropriate to consider such items as the
reduced lot size of the neighborhood commercial area and the request for
smaller street frontages for lots located on a "tight" radius as variances
granted as part of the Planned Unit Development request for the property.
Planner Enger responded that the Planned Unit Development process was
available for such purposes, but that the requests required justification by
the proponents.
Gartner stated that, generally, variances included as part of a Planned Unit
Development implied that the variances were granted to allow for flexibility
and opportunities for both the developer and the City that would otherwise
not be possible through the standard requirements of the Code. She
emphasized that the City must also realize� some benefit from any variances
IOSG)
r Planning Commission Minutes 11 March 10, 1986
proposed as part of a Planned Unit Development.
MOTION:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Hallett, to continue this item to
the April 14, 1986, Planning Commission meeting, with direction for revision
to the plans as discussed at this meeting.
Motion carried--7-0-0
l oW
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #86-81
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF HOYT ROBERTS ADDITION PHASE III
FOR HOYT CONSTRUCTION
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Hoyt Roberts Addition Phase III, for Hoyt Construction,
dated March 27, 1986, consisting of 9.62 acres into two lots and road right-of-way,
a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the
provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments
thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 6th day of May, 1986.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
4
/obi
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Don Uram, Assistant Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: April 11, 1986
PROJECT: Hoyt Roberts 2nd Addition
LOCATION: South of Highway #5, west of Mitchell Road, north of Scenic Heights,
at Technology Drive
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER: Hoyt Development
REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 Park on
approximatley five acres.
2. Preliminary Plat of 9.62 acres into two lots.
Background N, i
This site is currently designated on
Plan for development as Industrial
property. Surrounding -2-R .
properties to �14
the north, east, and west, are also
guided for development with In- 7/
dustrial land uses. The property to 11 .
the south is currently guided for 't
Low Density Residential land use; / 16-1
however, it is zoned for Public land PROPOSED SITE PRK
use and is the location of the Eden \K ;,•.;:v: '""'""
Prairie Methodist Church. Adjacent ti "'=�
land uses include the Eden Prairie 6 '
Industrial Center zoned 1-2Park RI 22 __7
zoned
the west, Roberts Litho zoned 1-2 79-0
Park to the east, and the Eaton
Char-Lynn complex, zoned I-5 Park,
located to the north. jaLTE3
6-9,16-10 I-5PRK
The City's Comprehensive Guide Plan ""also indicates alternative locations r —4— II g® ' 1
for the alignment of Highway #212. -� ! _ _ = r r
-..
Attachment B shows the alignment 9 9-8 4 .. rr '0
•
preferred by the City (Residential RI-9.5 ' , j- e � '�
Alignment), which would follow fit, t
Highway #5 and the railroad tracks ''o - ,� I .,�
before extending out into the Rural 4 �i. ♦
AREA LOCATION MAP
Eoaa
Hoyt Roberts 2nd Addition 2 April 11, 1986
area. The other alignment would follow Highway #5 for a shorter distance, then
turning in a southwesterly direction, crossing Mitchell Road between Cooperative
Power and CPT buildings and align through the Roberts Litho property, crossing
County Road #4 approximately one-quarter mile south of the railroad track crossing.
Site Plan
The site plan depicts the construction of a 52,980 square foot office/warehouse
building which will be utilized as an office/showroom/production facility similar to
that of Roberts Litho and the surrounding buildings. There are also plans for a
building expansion of approximately 14,274 square feet which is to be located along
the west end of the proposed building.
Based on a lot size of 217,800 square feet and proposed building size of 52,980
square feet, a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 24.3% is achieved. With the expansion of
the building, increasing the total square footage to 67,254 square feet, the total
FAR on-site will equal 30.8%. The maximum FAR in an I-2 Park zoning district for a
single-story building is 30%. Staff recommends that at a minimum, the proposed
expansion should be reduced by 1,914 square feet which would bring the building
within the 30% FAR Code requirement. In addition, the reduction in building size
decreases the total proof-of-parking requirement by six spaces. Also, because of
the reduced building square footage, there is room which allows for 90-degree angle
parking along the western end of the building. A redesigned parking layout in this
location would allow for an additional 17 spaces which, in conjunction with the
reduction of six spaces due to square footage loss, can be located elsewhere on-
site. Because of this, Staff recommends that the 22 parking spaces along the north
property adjacent to the entrance of the site be converted to permanent open space
including berming and planting. (Attachment A) Finally, the proponent shall
demonstrate that 5% of the total hard surface area within the parking area is
landscaped planting islands per the landscape ordinance with any proposed building
expansion.
The proposed building has setbacks of a 130 feet from the north property line, 35
feet from the southerly property line, 125 feet from the eastern property line, and
180 feet from the westerly property line. With the proposed expansion, the westerly
setback will be decreased to approximately 60 feet. AU of the proposed setbacks
meet the requirements of the I-2 Park zoning district.
Access and Parking
Previous plans for the development of the Roberts Litho property located to the east
of this site, considered the possibility of the extension of Technology Drive to
Wallace Road. Since that time, the plans for this extension have been discontinued,
leaving this site access from a private drive which would begin at the cul-de-sac on
Technology Drive to the east and serve both Roberts Litho and the subject property.
At the time of the development of the Roberts Litho site, the proponent had
dedicated a portion of the right-of-way along the north property line to accommodate
a potential Technology Drive extension. Because this right-of-way is no longer
required, the proponent is requesting that the right-of-way be vacated to the
subject property and used for portions of the private drive. In discussions with
the City Engineering staff, it was determined that the feasibility of this property,
being serviced by the private drive, was acceptable.
Based on a total square footage of 52,980 square feet, which involves a breakdown of
lllj
Hoyt Roberts 2nd Addition 3 April 11, 1986
4,000 square feet into office space, and 48,980 square feet into warehouse space, a
total of 44 parking spaces would be required. This is based on a parking ratio of
five spaces per 1,000 square feet for office, and 0.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet
for warehouse. The site plan currently depicts a total of 84 parking spaces located
on this site. With the proposed expansion of this property to a total of 67,254
square feet, additional parking spaces will be required. Using the calculation of a
spec building which would include 1/3 office (5 spaces/1000 G.F.A.), 1/3 warehouse
(.5 spaces/1000 G.F.A.), and 1/3 manufacturing (3 spaces/1000 G.F.A.), a total of
192 parking spaces would be required. The current site plan depicts a total of 85
parking spaces currently provided along with 107 proof-of-parking spaces. Per
Staff's recommendation regarding a decrease in building size to conform with FAR
requirements of 30%, a total of 186 spaces would be required.
Grading
The existing topography of this site indicates that the property is relatively
level. However, there is an existing high point in the southwest corner which will
require a general shaping and contouring to allow for the drive access. In
addition, there is a 355-foot long retaining wall which is located along the
southern property. The maximum height of this retaining wall is approximately 21
feet. The purpose of the retaining wall is to allow for the construction of the
drive-through around the rear of the building and to allow for the trucks to
manuever into the loading bays. The applicant will be required to submit retaining
wall details prior to the building permit issuance.
Utilities
This site can be serviced by existing water and sewer lines which are located along
the northern property line. The size of these lines include an eight-inch water
line, and an eight-inch sewer line. Storm water run-off is proposed to sheet drain
across the parking lot and deposited into a catch basin system which flows in an
easterly direction towards the existing storm sewer system within the Roberts Litho
parking lot.
Landscaping
The proposed landscape plan depicts a total of 155 caliper inches of plant material
required for this site. The landscape ordinance requires any one-story building,
which exceeds 20 feet in height, will require double the caliper inch requirements
for a single-story building. Because of that, a total of 300 caliper inches of
plant material shall be required on this site. The applicant will be required to
revise the landscape plan to depict a total of 300 caliper inches of landscaping for
this site. In addition, the landscape ordinance requires that 5% of the total hard
surface area within the parking lot shall be landscaped planting islands. The
proponent shall demonstrate this requirement on the revised landscape plan.
Along the southern property line are a stand of coniferous trees measuring
approximately 20-30 feet in height. Due to the fact that the church is located to
the south of this property and that large gaps occur within the stand of evergreen
trees, the proponent shall be required to plant large caliper inch coniferous trees
of a similar species in these gaps to provide screening from the parking areas and
building located to the north. It is recommended that the proponent work with the
church to determine the appropriate location for additional plantings.
Hoyt Roberts 2nd Addition 4 April 11, 1986
Architecture
The building is proposed to be constructed primarily of corduroy finished block,
tinted glass, triple scored concrete block and precast concrete panels. Each of the
building elevations differ and are described as follows. Primary building materials
on the north and west elevations of the building include corduroy finished block,
tinted glass, and triple scored concrete block. The southern elevation which is the
location of four loading bays and entrance doors is primarily precast concrete
panels. This panel measures approximately 23 feet in height and is consistent with
the typical industrial buildings within this area. The eastern elevation which
measures 62 feet in width has approximately 40 feet of exterior finish consisting of
corduroy block and two bands of triple scored concrete block and is an extension of
the same type of finish located along the northern edge of the building. The
remainder of this wall is constructed with precast concrete panels, again measuring
approximately 23 feet in height and is the location of two loading docks. Prior to
building permit issuance, exterior building material samples and colors shall be
submitted for review by the City staff.
Rooftop mechanical units are proposed to be screened with a metal panel the color of
which shall match the color of the concrete block. To assure compliance with the
rooftop mechanical screening, the City requires that the proponents bond for the
cost of screening.
Signage and Lighting
Proponent has indicated that exterior identification signage shall be in compliance
with City ordinance and be located on the one-foot access band above the window
openings. Additional signage will be located on the door glass itself in the form
of three-inch or four-inch lettering.
Exterior lighting will be wall-mounted quartz wall packed light fixtures.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the request for a Zoning District Change from
Rural to I-2 Park and a Preliminary Plat of 9.62 acres into two lots based on plans
dated March 27, 1986, and based upon recommendations in the Staff Report dated April
11, 1986, and subject to the following recommendations:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Submit a revised landscape plan to indicate a total of 300 caliper
inches of plant material located on-site based upon the landscape
ordinance in locations benefiting the gaps in the southern property
line.
8. Submit retaining wall details.
C. Submit revised grading, landscaping, and site plans reflecting a
maximum FAR of 30% on-site.
D. Submit revised grading, landscaping, and site plans based on a
reduced building square footage reflecting Do-degree angle parking
along the western end of the building. These plans shall also show
the conversion of the 22 parking spaces adjacent to the entrance to
permanent open space including berming and plantings.
t.
N
Hoyt Roberts 2nd Addition 5 April 11, 19B6
E. The proponent shall submit figures detailing the amount of island
planting (5%) with any proposed building expansion.
2. Prior to Final Plat, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off, erosion control and utility
plans for review by the City Engineer.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
C. Complete the process for vacating the dedicated right-of-way for
Technology Drive and receive approval by the Engineering Department
for the extension of a private drive.
3. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Submit building material samples and colors for review.
B. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
C. Provide plans for review by the Fire Marshal.
D. Provide signage and lighting details.
4. Prior to grading permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading.
B. Stake the construction limits with erosion control fencing.
1
'M-
I
m
'- f•••••••-•wi,, '
..• ''T ----•
.:, 7'4.
....t i I... 1 i I Th
---a. —I rik t) \
.1 I , I ,.
. ,
. rt,;*•
• E l' ..,,. •
t +,. ; ".. •1;,
1 • . ei
- i ' 4w • r _ , 1
IR I
IT g 1 1 ; ' -s I-7—' '\4( • .,
?-4
---/--- i=IIIIIIIII ,
\A 44
1
; ,-, I
;1 1-1 •••6 '' -t‘ -..,,i
.....
rn Ti •a•••• • / /x--irt_1--- 1_ ' ..----
„,, 2_
(1 4 •••••:*1 i'' If I,
rr.A i Iv,* . 1"I,:;'-' 1-7,7 ' _J. ‘ \ 'CZ-- .
z
''s
,,.I •
—I---, ,....,‘
i--- ‘ •.
I ,....
,
:,,-2
-- \ -•
I C.? ---. - Th
— . ,
...:, _.
)i -9-..'", ..- 21"...."—'9r7-9 - ( 9
,• 14 "-ir C)9 ' '19 19
,,,-. , p, !6-
•
)t ' g , ,.
,i ) ,,,I,
7--- 9 lt
"9-
'; ---r_
'
---- . . f-,9
,,-,
— ..------, --•- - 4,,e,,
i . -- ' --
i --,.--
I --.4 -
A ,
t.
I I -
- --...—---•-..- '''"-
I i 1 [1. (,99------ 9
111911 s' ----•
I 1 z , ;.).;.- -,;
.,„:r.
t 1 .(-.1.---,t: ::: : c.:,•.,T,"-i
_ I
3 14-I 0 \ ,( —_____ I • , 1 I t', I,
I ''.-.. - ••.,-•
..., r-, • , _ - - • --,-:, -- _..1 ‘
ALTERNATIVE SITE PLAN - --. ,r)
/4"6/
3
s/ LOriT' i S OO i17
( .� • F, F wC a$" •
r
,o- I_,..____, ... • l'N? s.'/ „,"/ ••
/ ® lieti . ! Q
ono Nile' •, O E toot 1 �4
v., 1 d• uRt ` -
t [0[N �` •
_ 31
• LANE 1 ow ;,I, O LA. I - -
i 11
O n
_ . _14 RIIIPORT ZZ [0EN PNRINIt
B 1 7.,=
1 NILL LLRC ._
1 .fe. \ vtR/M
1... .. NNfSOTA ,
SCOpI
•NFNNEPIN r MI
Kt 7 _- SCOTT -- - ,_, - LRt!
samoig
--II-` SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR
s---.00...- ALTERNATIVES ,NN So
.: �` I e 416
-L.___e.i 1 l T.H. 212 t g
OCTOBER, 1985 4>OFTaPNy
`' SCALE
( GOLDEN VALLEY OlSTR1C7
0 40001 8000'
MEMO���
ALTERNATIVES RECOMMENDED 7
/ FOR FURTHER STUDY
1 `O jC STUDY COPY FOR INFORMATION ONLY ow ow ALTERNATIVES NOT
I
RECOMMENDED FOR FURTHER
STUDY
ATTACHMENT B
Planning Commission Minutes 5 April 21, 1986
B. HOYT ROBERTS ADDITION PHASE II, by Hoyt Construction. Request for
onistrict Change from Rural to 1-2 Park on 5.0 acres and
Preliminary Plat of 9.62 acres into 2 lots and road right-of-way for
construction of Phase II, Hoyt Roberts Addition. Location: West of
Mitchell Road on Technology Drive. A public hearing.
Mr. Brad Hoyt, proponent, reviewed the proposed development and site
characteristics with the Commission. He noted that access to the site would
be from the Roberts Litho property to the east, and that the plans assumed
the return of right-of-way for Technology Drive to the property owners to
the south (all along the Hoyt Roberts Addition).
Planner Enger reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff Report
of April 11, 1986. He noted that parking had been considered for this
building based on it being a "speculative" building, or tenants unknown.
Mr. Hoyt pointed out that the building would be owned and largely occupied
by Kleer Flo, therefore, parking was adequate for the structure, based on
the revised plans presented at the meeting.
Planner Enger stated that the most significant situation involved in this
development was that of the extension of Technology Drive. He stated that
the plan of the City had been to extend Technology Drive, along the north
edge of this property, westerly to Wallace Road to provide for better
circulation in this area. Planner Enger pointed out that the proponent had
cooperated with the City in providing the requested right-of-way for the
extension; however, the City Council had since determined that this would
not take place.
Hallett stated that he felt the provision of Technology Drive through this
area was important in terms of providing for better traffic circulation for
this area, in particular for the school. He stated that he felt the City
Council should reconsider making this connection, even if the City had to
pay for the land, or construction, costs. He stated that he felt it would
be better to make the connection of Technology Drive at this time than have
to pay much more for it to correct a problem in the future.
Hallett asked if adequate land was available other than from proponent for
this road connection. Mr. Hoyt stated that there was land available north
of his site for the extension of Technology Drive to Wallace Road, and that
this property did not provide the only opportunity for the connection.
Chairman Schuck asked for comments, or questions, from members of the
audience. There were none.
MOTIDN 1:
Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Anderson, to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried--4-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Anderson, to recommend to the City
Planning Commission Minutes 6 April 21, 1986
Council approval of the request of Hoyt Development for Zoning District
Change from Rural to 1-2 Park for the Hoyt Roberts 2nd Addition for five
acres, based on plans dated March 12, 1986, subject to the recommendations
of the Staff Report dated April 11, 1986.
Motion carried--4-0-0
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Ruebling, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Hoyt Development for Preliminary Plat of
9.62 acres into two lots and road right-of-way for construction of Phase II
of the Hoyt Roberts Addition, based on plans dated March 12, 1986, subject
to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 11, 1986.
Motion carried--4-0-0
MOTION 4:
Motion was made by Hallett, seconded by Anderson, to recommend to the City
Council that the road extension of Technology Drive between its current
terminus west of Mitchell Road to Wallace Road be completed in order to
provide for better transportation circulation for the residents, school, and
businesses in the area.
Motion carried--4-0-0
(Dodge arrived at 8:45 p.m.)
V. OLD BUSINESS
None.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
None.
VII. PLANNER'S REPORT
Planner Enger reviewed the current status of the Comprehensive Guide Plan,
its relationship to the Zoning Ordinance, traffic issues, and the recent
Community Profile prepared by the Planning Staff.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION TO ADJOURN was made by Hallett, seconded by Anderson.
Chairman Schuck adjourned the meeting at 10:35 p.m.
10 70
HERBST & THEE, LTD.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
20,H,NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER
7000 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH
AnaiwN E.HEHHST TELEPHONE
DANIEL D.THCE BLOODSINOTON,MINNESOTA 55431-1178 (012)835-2434
Gant H.Mart
JOHN F.GInus
Tom Toows
DIANE M.SCHMIDT April 28, 1986
JOHN M.STANOCH
Rick E.MATTox
REESE E.CIIELICK
James F. Miller, Chairman Craig Rapp
City Manager City Manager
City of Minnetonka City of Hopkins
14600 Minnetonka Blvd. 1010 South First Street
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Hopkins, Minnesota 55343
Steve Devich Ken Rosland
Acting City Manager City Manager
City of Richfield City of Edina
6700 Portland Avenue 4801 West 50 Street
Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Edina, Minnesota 55424
((Carl Jullie
/ City Manager
City of Eden Prairie
1 8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
RE: Southwest Suburban Cable Commission
Rogers Refinancing Plan
Our File Number 86-0059G
Gentlemen:
Attached you will find a Resolution to be submitted by you
to your City Councils for approval at the scheduled public
hearings regarding the request of Rogers for approval of its
refinancing plan.
You may recall that we initially recommended that there be a
Resolution and an amendment Ordinance. After meeting with the
City Attorneys it was agreed that because of the nature of the
past amendment Ordinance it would not be necessary to amend the
ordinance further to carry out the approval of the refinancing
plan of Rogers. Therefore, the Resolution that is enclosed will
provide the approval requested by Rogers.
It is also contemplated that after Rogers has submitted to
the Southwest Commission its final agreements, the Southwest
Commission will complete its study and make a final
recommendation to the Cities. At that time the Cities will
IJ?1
HERBST & TRUE, LTD.
Operating Committee Members
Page Two
April 28, 1986
review the final recommendation of the SWSCC and adopt another
Resolution giving final approval to the refinancing plan,
permitting the change in controlling interest, and authorizing
the extension of the franchise term by four years.
We have also enclosed a copy of the initial report of Touche
Ross based upon the information submitted to it from the
Southwest Commission. Touche Ross has given its favorable
recommendation to the approval of the refinancing plan. The
basis of their recommendation is the following:
1. The term of the long term debt will be extended by
three years. It also may be deferred by two years but that
arrangement has not yet been finalized.
2. The interest rate will be one percent above prime as
opposed to 1.5 percent above prime.
3. The refinancing plan proposes a change in controlling
interest of Rogers Cablesystems of Minnesota from Rogers U.S.
Cablesystems, Inc., to Rogers American Cable Corporation. The
Rogers American Cable Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Rogers Cablesystems of America, Inc. Although all of the
financial information with regard to Rogers Cablesystems of
America, Inc., has not been fully provided to the financial
consultant, they have advised us that Rogers Cablesystems of
America is a sound corporation with good cash flow because it
owns a number of operating cable systems that are financially
successful for a number of reasons, including high penetration
rates. Further, that entity has a line of credit in the amount
of $20 million. According to the financial consultant, his
meetings with the representatives of the Rogers Cablesystems
requesting approval from us has resulted in an assurance that
that company's finances, including its line of credit, will be
available for any cash shortfalls of this local franchise.
The Southwest Commission recommended a process to the Member
Cities which is being followed. The process includes following
the requirements under state law and the franchise ordinances
relating to a sale, transfer or change in controlling interest of
a cable system. According to the process, the public hearing
that has been scheduled should permit the cable company to
address the City Councils with regard to its requests, City shall
also review the proposed Resolution and consider the financial
report of the Southwest Commission. Additionally, the City
Councils should consider any public testimony that may be
!!
HERBST Bc TRUE, LTD.
Operating Committee Members
Page Three
April 28, 1986
presented at the public hearings. At the conclusion of the
public hearings, the attached Resolution should be adopted. This
Resolution by its adoption will permit the cable company to
finalize the arrangements that are necessary to complete its
refinancing plan and also permit the southwest Commission and the
Cities an opportunity to complete whatever final reviews are
•
necessary before final approval is given. Also, as has been the
process worked out together with the various City Attorneys in
the past, various acceptance documents including guarantees will
be required to make effective the approvals that are given by the
Member Cities.
On Friday of last week we met with the City Attorneys to
review the Resolutions and various requirements necessary to
consider and finalize the requests of Rogers. The Resolution
which is enclosed is the product of that meeting. A copy of this •
Resolution has been sent to the individual City Attorneys for
their review.
Very uuly , I.
Adrian E. Herbst
AEH:pms
Enc.
II
(.
103
I
•
HERBST & TRUE,LTD.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
( 2000 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER
7000 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH
ADRIAN E.RERB ST TELETHONS
DANIEL D.THUE BLOOMINGTON,MINNESOTA SSa01."78 (012)H3S-24:Ja
GARY R.MArz
JoxN F.Glsas April 29, 1986
Tom'Loons
DIANE M.SCHMIDT
JOHN M.STANOCH
R,cx E.MATrox
REESE E.GHEEICM
Rick Rosow, City Attorney Tom Erickson, City Attorney
City of Eden Prairie City of Edina
4108 IDS Center 2200 First Bank Place East
Minneapolis, MN 55402 Minneapolis, MN 55402
Jerre Miller, City Attorney Clayton LeFevere, City Attorney
City of Hopkins City of Richfield
Suite 400 2000 First Bank Place West
Northwest Bank Building Minneapolis, MN 55402
Hopkins, MN 55343
Desyl Peterson, City Attorney
City of Minnetonka
14600 Minnetonka Boulevard
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345
RE: Southwest Suburban Cable Commission
Our File Number 86-0059G
Dear City Attorneys:
Enclosed please find a Resolution that we prepared based on
our meeting last Friday. Substantially the Resolution is
considered to be in final form, however, should you have any
language modifications I would appreciate your contacting me in
the next few days. The Public Hearings have been scheduled in
the very near future and any comments you have regarding the
Resolution should be incorporated as soon as possible. Thank
you.
Very (Jt'x yl yours,
- I
Adr an E. Her st
AEH:pms
Enc.
cc: Operating Committee of SWSCC
RESOLUTION No. 86-91
RESOLUTION GIVING TENTATIVE APPROVAL
TO REFINANCING PLAN OF ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS
OF MINNESOTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
WHEREAS, The City of , Minnesota,
(hereinafter "City") is the franchising authority pursuant to the
Cable Communications Ordinance of City; and
WHEREAS, Rogers Cablesystems of Minnesota Limited
Partnership (hereinafter "Grantee") is the Grantee under the Cable
Communications Ordinance of City (hereinafter "Ordinance"); and
WHEREAS, City has adopted amendments to the Ordinance which
were intended to provide relief to Grantee from financial operating
cash shortfalls and additionally financially burdensome long term
debt; and
WHEREAS, the amendment granted by City to Grantee contemplated
that Grantee would obtain refinancing and restructure its long term
debt to improve the financial viability of its cable
communications system within City; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Ordinance, Article II, Section 4,
Grantee was permitted a designated time to refinance and the term of
the franchise granted by the Ordinance was extended by four (4)
years subject to approval by City of the refinancing; and
WHEREAS, Grantee has prepared a refinancing plan, a copy of
which is attached, and asked City to approve this refinancing
plan; and
WHEREAS, as part of the refinancing plan it is contemplated
that there will be a change of controlling interest in Grantee from
Rogers Cablesystems of Minnesota, Inc., (hereinafter "RCMI") to
Rogers American Cable Corporation (hereinafter "RACC"), a wholly
owned subsidiary of Rogers Cablesystems of America, Inc.,
(hereinafter "RCA") ; and
WHEREAS, because of the financial strength of RCA, including
a positive cash position and a $20 million line of credit, the
financial consultant of SWSCC has advised the change in
controlling interest is favorable for the Member Cities of SWSCC
and that RCA should provide its assurance that its cash flow and
line of credit will be available as backup to Grantee; and
WHEREAS, the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission
(hereinafter "SWSCC") , acting on behalf of City and other Cities
which are part of the same cable system, has reviewed the request
of Grantee, utilized the services of a financial consultant, and has
- 1 -
ii1J,
advised City that the request of Grantee should be acted upon by
City in accordance with a process that will allow for a public
hearing, consideration of the financial consultant's report,
tentative approval, and final approval upon completion by Grantee of
its change of ownership to RACC; and
WHEREAS, the SWSCC has submitted the initial report of its
financial consultant to City, a copy of which is attached,
reflecting the desirability of the refinancing plan of Grantee; and
WHEREAS, upon completion of the change of ownership to RACC,
the SWSCC will undertake, together with the financial consultant,
to complete and submit to City before final approval its report
and recommendations including a report on the financial strength
of RACC; and
WHEREAS, City expects that upon final approval of the
refinancing plan and change of ownership an acceptance will be
executed by RACC, Grantee and RCA together with other documents as
may be necessary to assure the financial viability of the cable
communication system in City and for purposes of acceptance of
the responsibilities of a grantee under the Ordinances.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City of
in a regular meeting assembled, as follows:
The City tentatively approves of:
A. Transfer of controlling interest in Grantee from
RCMI to RACC, a wholly owned subsidiary of RCA;
B. The refinancing of the long term debt as
contemplated in Article II, Section 4, of Ordinance;
C. Final approval by City will be considered only
upon occurrence of the following:
1. SWSCC receives the agreements from Grantee
reflecting the final change of ownership arrangements
and the financing of the long term debt, and with its
financial consultant has provided City with its
favorable recommendation as to the final arrangements
having met the requirements of Ordinance and the
financial viability of Grantee;
2. Written evidence from Grantee that the
refinancing plan will occur;
3. If the foregoing has been complied with, City
will adopt a final resolution approving the
refinancing, the change in ownership of Grantee and the
extension of the term of the franchise granted by
Ordinance by four (4) years to be effective subject to:
- 2 -
/0%
a. Compliance with the provisions of
Article XIX of Ordinance, including delivery to
City of an acceptance, opinions of legal counsel
of Grantee and RACC, guarantees of Grantee, RACC and
RCA, execution by RACC of the Performance
Agreement and such other instruments as may be
reasonably necessary to permit the change in
ownership and ensure the economic viability of the
cable communication system in City;
b. Other Member Cities of SWSCC having
adopted a final resolution of approval.
Dated this day of , 1986.
Mayor
SWRESOL2
- 3 -
/031
•
Touche Ross&Co.
One SW Columba,Suitet500 0 Touche Ross
Portland,OR 97258-2090
Telephone:503 243.6333
April 23, 1986
Mr. Adrian Herbst
Herbst & Thue, Ltd.
2030 Northwestern Financial Center
7900 Xerxes Avenue South
Bloomington, Minnesota 55431
Dear Adrian:
In response to your request for a review of the proposed
transfer of ownership of Rogers' Southwest Suburbs cable
system, I am providing the following information:
• The proposed loan financing in conjunction with
the transfer appears favorable compared to the
existing loan requirements and to present fi-
nancing in the industry.
- The existing loan requires repayment by
1991. The proposed arrangement spreads
the repayment over a longer period, to
1994 (of possibly later, if a deferral
is negotiated). The principal payment
requirements under the proposed arrange-
ment are significantly less each year
between 1986 and 1991 than they are under
the existing agreement.
- The proposed interest arrangement is
prime plus 1%, compared to prime plus
1-1/2% under the current agreement.
- We contacted certain lending institutions
and described the Southwest Suburbs sys-
tem. The proposed eight-year repayment
term is similar to terms quoted by these
institutions, and the prime plus 11 in-
terest rate is somewhat lower than rates
quoted by these institutions.
7 Touche Ross international
•
•
L 1ouche ROss
• Rogers Cablesystems of America, Inc. (RCA) is
a healthier financial entity than Rogers U.S.
Cablesystems, Inc. (RUSCI).
- The overall basic penetration of the RCA
systems, (reported to be 58.9%) and the
monthly revenue per subscriber (reported
to be $23.55) compare favorably to
national averages. In contrast, the
systems under RUSCI generally have rela-
tively low penetration.
- RCA reportedly has a $20 million line of
operating credit that may be applied to
cover cash needs of its constituent sys-
tems.
- We have requested additional RCA finan-
cial information from Rogers, and will
update our observations for you once we
have received and analyzed this informa-
tion.
• The projected operating cash flow of the
Southwest Suburbs system may not in itself be
sufficient to service the debt each year.
Rogers may have to draw on the RCA cash flow
from other operations, the RCA line of credit,
or some other source to help meet the repayment
schedule.
- We updated our Southwest Suburbs finan-
cial projection model with base case
assumptions similar to those Rogers in-
cluded with its March 14, 1986 corres-
pondence to you. Applying the base case
assumptions, there is sufficient cumula-
tive operating cash flow to service the
loan. However, in certain years the
cumulative cash flow after debt service
approaches zero, leaving little margin
for shortfalls from the base case
assumptions.
UTouche Ross
- We tested the sensitivity of the projec-
tions to certain less favorable assump-
tions.
.. If the prime rate were to increase
to 11%, the system's cumulative
cash flow would not be sufficient
in certain years to service the
debt.
.. If the system's basic penetration
were to cap at 45%, the system's
cumulative cash flow would not be
sufficient in certain years to
service the debt.
.. A deferral of the principal repay-
ments, to begin in 1988 and extend
into 1996, would enable the system
to service its debt each year out
of operating cash flow, even if the
prime rate were at 11% and basic
penetration capped at 451 (and all
other assumptions remained the same
as in the base case).
- Even under the unfavorable assumptions
(11% prime rate and 45% basic penetration
cap) the system's projected cumulative
cash flow after debt service eventually
becomes positive by 1995 or 1996. If RCA
or other funds were made available (at
an interest rate of prime plus 1%) for
the interim periods of cash shortfalls,
the system could eventually service its
own debt. Given the other assumptions
(base case with a 45% basic penetration
cap), the prime rate would need to aver-
age about 13% to cause the system not to
be able to cumulatively service its debt
by 1996.
• Certain other information should be obtained
from Rogers to help assure the adequacy of the
proposed change in financing, including:
Touche Ross
- Confirmation of the terms of the appli-
cable loan arrangement, including the
interest requirement, repayment schedule,
and covenants.
- Assurance that other sources of funds
(for example, from RCA operations or from
RCA's line of credit) will be available
to service the Southwest Suburbs debt for
any periods where the Southwest Suburbs'
immediate cash flow may be insufficient.
I will report further to you when we have reviewed the
additional RCA financial information we have requested.
The conclusions I have expressed in this letter are subject
to the review of this information and to your receipt of
the confirmation and assurances from Rogers described
above.
Please contact me at (503) 243-6333 if you have any ques-
tions.
(, Sincerely,
•
Jay C. Smith
JCS/jim
HERBST & TRUE, LTD.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Southwest Suburban Cable Commission
FROM: Adrian E. Herbst, Attorney
DATE: April 28, 1986
RE: Additional Information from Financial Consultant
The Operating Committee instructed me to request the
financial consultant to provide additional information as
follows:
QUESTION #1. Is refinancing of the long term debt of the
Grantee necessary, given the present low interest rates?
QUESTION #2. Would the financial consultant give his
advise based upon use of a 40 percent penetration as opposed to a
45 percent penetration?
On Monday, April 28, 1986, Mr. Jay Smith responded to me to
the above two questions as follows:
ANSWER #1. The present long term debt of Rogers without
regard to low interest rates is too burdensome for the company to
handle. The reason for this is because the principal payments
will start to become due in June of this year together with
interest rates. Additionally, the length of the obligation is
too short. It is only a five year term. According to the
studies of the financial consultant, irrespective of present
interest rates, refinancing is essential.
ANSWER #2. Using a 40 percent penetration rate and a nine
percent prime rate of interest, the company would experience
several years of negative cash flow; however on a cumulative
basis by the year 1996 the cash flow would be positive.
Therefore, the company would be able to meet its obligations
under the fullest refinancing plan even if penetration were only
40 percent. However, if there is an interest charge by the
parent company for carrying the shortfall, then the Grantee would
not be able to meet its debt and the refinancing would not be
acceptable. The financial consultant feels that a 45 percent
penetration rate is reasonable to be considered in the
refinancing plan given the fact that the company previously was
experiencing an approximate 44 percent penetration rate and in
his opinion it was only due to rate changes that a decline in
subscribers occurred. He believes that the penetration rate will
increase. If the penetration rate is only 40 percent and
interest is charged to carry the cash shortfall, the most that
the prime rate of interest could be would be 9 percent.
SW21
ID A
}
MAY 6,1986
(, 39 VOID OUT CHECK 17.00-
t..:,13 VOID OUT CHECK 15.00-
26496 VOID OUT CHECK 79.00- 1
26663 VOID OUT CHECK 224.00-
26696 VOID OUT CHECK 56.00-
26704 COMMERCIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO APRIL LIFE INSURANCE 207.90
26705 PRUDENTIAL APRIL LIFE INSURANCE 615.62
26706 GROUP HEALTH PLAN INC APRIL INSURANCE 2286.95
26707 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN APRIL INSURANCE 13274.01
26708 MARK VII SALES BEER 12006.90
26709 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 3731.15
26710 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO MIX 514.40
26711 COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIX 506.30
26712 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE CO MIX 59.46
26713 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 194.60
26714 ROYAL CROWN BEVERAGE CO MIX 69.60
26715 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER 5987.70
26716 BEER WHOLESALERS INC BEER 4315.65
26717 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 9802.14
26718 REX DISTRI8UTING CO INC BEER 140.95
26719 DANA GIBBS PACKET DELIVERIES 65.00
26720 MINNESOTA DEPT OF P/S MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION 36.50
26721 KRISTA M WORDE VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL - FEES PD 26.00
26722 JERRY ANDERSON HOCKEY OFFICIAL - FEES PD 79.50
26723 SO HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCI CONFERENCE - ASSISTANT MANAGER 6.00
V.?4 MAUMA CONFERENCE - ASSISTANT MANAGER 20.00
i 25 PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT PETTY CASH 35.16
26726 TWIN CITY WINE CO LIQUOR 1922.25
26727 PAUSTIS & SONS CO WINE 58.50
26728 QUALITY WINE CO WINE 851.40
26729 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 116.56
26730 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO WINE 3089.53
26731 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 4357.65
26732 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY MUNICIPALS DINNER-1/2 PD BY CITY EMPLOYEES 16.75
26733 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 1132.33
26734 AT & T COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 198.10 1
26735 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 59.02 f
26736 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 17210.59 1
26737 VOID CHECK 0.00
26738 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF P/S MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION 35.25
26739 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC APRIL 86 INSURANCE 7160.45
26740 KEVIN CARNEY REFUND SKATING LESSONS 15.00
26741 WENDY CREVIER REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS 16.00
26742 CHRISTINE FORD REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS 16.00
26743 KATHY FRICK REFUND PRENATAL CLASSES 26.00
26744 DANIELLE HEINEN REFUND PRENATAL CLASSES 11.00
26745 CHRISTOPHER LARSON REFUND RACQUETBALL LESSONS 23.00
26746 GAY LEWIS REFUND PRENATAL CLASSES 26.OD
26747 PAUL MESSER REFUND KIDS KORNER 18.00
26748 LAURA MORAN REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS 11.00
26749 ANDREW NELSON REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS 14.00
2' "0 LAURA NELSON REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS 14.00
2c. .,1 LESLIE LEA NORD REFUND PRENATAL CLASSES 26.00
26752 MICHELE PRINGLE REFUND PRENATAL CLASSES 18.00
26753 NADINE REDA REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS 14.00 1
9004687 (I083)
S
26754 DEREK WATSON REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS 14.00
26755 MICHAEL WRIGHT REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS 16.00
26756 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 4133.15
26757 RIVIERA SUPPER CLUB EXPENSES - REIMBURSED BY CITY EMPLOYEES 349.80
"758 AIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BLADES FOR MOWER - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 122.19
.59 PRINT-SHACK PRINTING - COMMUNITY CENTER 96.67
26760 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 61.99
26761 STATE OF MINNESOTA BIKE REGISTRATIONS 65.00
26762 VOID CHECK 0.00
26763 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 40.87
26764 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CONFERENCE - ENGINEERING DEPT 80.00
26765 CYNTHIA MALLINGER REFUND GOLF LESSONS 22.00
26766 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 225.55
26767 U S POSTMASTER POSTAGE - CITY HALL BOND REFERENDUM 804.19
2676E MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER NOTARY PAPERS 10.00
26769 RUTH FRIEHE REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS 3.50
26770 CARI JEDLICKI REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS 5.75
26771 ASHARE-MN CHAPTER CONFERENCE - BUILDING DEPT 15.00
26772 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 351.73
26773 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO WINE 2206.57
26774 QUALITY WINE CO WINE 259.88
26775 TWIN CITY WINE WINE 708.09
26776 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO WINE 546.11
26777 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 2839.81
26778 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY MUNICIPAL BANQUET-1/2 PD BY CITY EMPLOYEES 16.75
26779 DANA GIBBS PACKET DELIVERIES 65.00
26780 AT & T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV SERVICE 13.80
26781 NORTHERN STATES POWER CD SERVICE 19544.09
26782 NORTHWESTERN SELL SERVICE 91.88
26783 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE MARCH 86 SPECIAL FUEL TAX 266.56
1 44 COURAGE CENTER -MEMORIAL GIFT - DONATIONS FRO CITY 30.00
EMPLOYEES
26785 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE MARCH 86 SALES TAX 15440.32
26786 NORWEST BANK MINNEAPOLIS NA BOND PAYMENT 2021090.14
26787 VOID CHECK 0.00
26788 FEDERAL RESERVE SANK PAYROLL 4/18/86 22869.38
26789 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PARYOLL 4/18/86 9637.76
26790 VOID CHECK 0.00
26791 DEPT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS PAYROLL 4/18/86 18072.52
26792 PERA PAYROLL 4/18/86 18594.01
26793 PERA PAYROLL 4/18/86 63.00
26794 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP PAYROLL 4/18/86 2025.00
26795 MN ST RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 4/18/86 10.00
26796 CITY-COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 4/18/86 2124.13
26797 THE GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 4/18/86 5073.00
26798 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK PAYROLL 4/18/86 200.00
26799 NORWEST BANK - HOPKINS PAYROLL 4/18/56 600.00
26800 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION 35.25
26801 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION 30.00
26802 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION 80.00
26B03 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 4/18/86 221.50
26804 MN UC FUND PAYROLL 4/18/86 278.31
26805 COVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE CONFERENCE - CITY MANAGER 125.00
26806 CRAGUN'S CONFERENCE CENTER EXPENSES - CITY MANAGER 212.41
214978766 (1084)
4
26807 PAM HANSEN REFUND RACQUETBALL LEAGUE 4.50
26808 LAURIE KROHN REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS 10.OD .
26809 RICHARD LUBANSKY REFUND TENNIS LESSONS 20.00
26810 BRYAN J LUHMAN REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS 2.00
26811 LISA LUHMAN REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS 2.00
( i12 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 363.33
co813 VOID CHECK 0.00
26814 VOID CHECK 0.00
26815 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO WINE 472.61 '
26816 QUALITY WINE CO WINE 777.89
26817 TWIN CITY WINE CO WINE 1146.82
26818 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO WINE 4882.30
26819 MRPA MEMBERSHIPS - COMMUNITY CENTER 240.00
26820 JIM WALTER PAPERS PAPER - CITY HALL 263.62
26821 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 3507.81
26822 WILLIAM MILLER REFUND FAMILY SWIM/FIT MEMBERSHIP 57.00
26823 STATE OF MN POST BOARD PEACE OFFICER LICENSE RENEWAL 225.00
26824 JOHN CROWTHER INC LIQUOR LIABILITY INSURANCE 3000.00
26825 TOM HAGEN REIMBURSE DEPOSIT FOR LANDSCAPE 80N0 9000.00
26826 MARIANNE SIMONS REFUND TENNIS LESSONS 20.00
26827 JIM WALTERS PAPERS PAPER - POLICE DEPT 527.24
26828 KELLY ROGERS REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS 11.00
26829 THOMAS PICDNE REFUND SINGLE SWIM/FIT/RAC MEMBERSHIP 57.00
26830 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 763.82
26831 A C T ELECTRONICS INC ADJUST TIMING CYCLE - ENG DEPT 33.75
26832 INDEPENDANT SCHOOL DISTRICT #272 REFUND WATER & SEWER 667.28
26833 ADOLFSON 8 PETERSON REFUND WATER METER DEPOSIT 94.02
26834 AMBASSADOR CLEANING CONTRACTORS STREET SWEEPING 1241.50
26835 AMERICAN FREIGHT SYSTEM INC FREIGHT CHARGES - WATER DEPT 260.41
26836 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK SAINT PAUL SERVICE 75.00
- '37 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC DUES - PLANNING DEPT 15.00
38 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC DUES - COt1MISSION MEMBER 105.00
26839 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC FILM - WATER DEPT 60.00
26840 EARL F ANOERSEN & ASSOC INC POSTS - STREET SIGNS 2680.45
26841 ARTSIGN MATERIALS CO OFFICE SUPPLIES 3B.47
26842 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC BLACKTOP 281.69
26843 ASTLEFORD INTL INC GAUGE/DOOR HANDLE - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 38.10
26844 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY PUTTY- PARK MAINTENANCE 20.55
26845 CASTLE RIDGE RESTAURANT AWARDS DINNER - CITY 1400.00
26846 AUTO-HDWE WAREHOUSE SPOTLIGHTS - WATER DEPT 378.74
26847 AUTO-HDWE WAREHOUSE 3 SPOTLIGHTS - PUBLIC SAFETY 135.28
26848 AVIS RENT A CAR FIRE MARSHAL VEHICLE 8700.00
26849 BARRETT MOVING & SOTRAGE CO EQUIPMENT RENTAL - POLICE DEPT 8.00
26850 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC -OIL FILTERS/MUFFLER CLAMP/AIR FILTERS/ 519.97
BRAKE PADS
26B51 BRIAN BENIEK BASKETBALL OFFICIAL -FEES PO 45.00
26852 BIG WHEEL AUTO STORES FLOOR MATS/MUD FLAPS 191.95
26853 BILL'S ECONOMY GLASS SERVICE 2 PLATES OF GLASS - CITY HALL 375.00
26854 SAM BLOOM IRON & METAL CO INC IRON - PARK MAINTENANCE 42.80
26855 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON MARCH 86 IMPOUNO SERVICE 300.00
26856 LOIS BOETTCHER MINUTES - PARK & REC COMMISSION MEETING 70.50
26857 LEE BRANDT HOCKEY OFFICIAL - FEES PD 361.00
26858 BROWN PHOTO FILM PROCESSING 117.60
26859 BRW -SERVICE - ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY/VALLEY 176D5.61
VIEW ROAD
'I661
(1085) �'
26860 VALERIE 8URN OFFICE SUPPLIE 9.99
2686I BURTON EQUIPMENT INC SAFETY CABINETS - WATER DEPT 996.00
26862 BUSINESS FURNITURE INC CHAIR - FINANCE DEPT 129.00
( 163 BUSINESSLAND CENTER #079 COMPUTER SOFTWARE - FIRE DEPT 444.80
..•'64 BUTCHS•8AR SUPPLY SUPPLIES - LIQUOR STORE 1036.10
26865 CARDOX CORP CAR8ON DIOXIDE - WATER DEPT 1455.37
26866 CENTURION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS SET UP FIRE MARSHALL CAR/SET UP SQUAD CAR 562.00
26867 CENTEX HOMES REFUND BUILDING PERMIT 2069.05
26868 CERTIFIED RUSTPROOFERS INC RUSTPROOFING 295.00
26869 CARLSON & CARLSON ASSOC SERVICE 2180.00
26870 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS HELMET LINERS - FORESTRY DEPT 19.80
26871 CHAPIN PU8LISHING CO LEGAL ADS 275.28
26872 CHEMLAWN LAWN FERTILIZATION - CITY HALL 100.00
26873 CITICORP INDUSTRIAL CREDIT MAY 1986 SERVICE 656.81
26874 CLEAN SWEEP INC SWEEP STREETS 2912.00
26875 CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SER INC -WHEEL CYLINDER/SEAL/BRAKE DRUM/GOVERNOR 473.26
FOR 8RAKES
26876 CLUTCH & U-JOINT 8URNSVILLE INC YOKE/STUB/REPAIR LA8DR -EQUIPMENT MAINT 143.83
26877 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICE - MITCHELL RD 3.93
26878 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER 1 MOBILE RADIO -STREET DEPT 958.28
26879 JOYCE CONLEY EXPENSES - POLICE DEPT 15.00
26880 JEFF CONRADI HOCKEY OFFICIAL - FEES PD 124.00
26881 CON/SPEC CORP SEALANT 2157.05
26882 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN SUBSCRIPTION - ENGINEERING DEPT 59.00
26883 CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP MICRD SHIELD - EQUIPMENT MAINT 94.33
26884 CONTROL DATA 8USINESS ADVISORS IN SERVICE - COMPARABLE WORTH 1290.80
26885 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY INC CLEANER/PANTS/COAT/SMOKE MACHINE-FIRE DEPT 3437.22
26886 BAR8ARA COOK MILEAGE 82.50
2F°87 COPY EQUIPMENT INC -REPAIR DIAZO MACHINE - ENGINEERING DEPT/ 135.44
t TAPE/VELLUM
2ou88 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS INC LIABILITY INSURANCE 1100.00
26889 CROWN RU88ER STAMP CO DESK SIGNS/NOTARY STAMP 27.25
26890 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME - WATER DEPT 4992.49
26891 DALCO -CLEANING SUPPLIES - COMMUNITY CENTER/ 485.16
FIRE DEPT
26892 JENNIFER DRESSEN EXPENSES 28.00
26893 JENNIFER DRESSEN EXPENSES - COMMUNITY CENTER 15.06
26894 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU SUPPLIES 181.73
26895 DRUMMOND AMERICAN CORP CHEMICALS - STREET DEPT 102.00
26896 EARL'S ART & DRAFTING SUPPLIES IN OFFICE SUPPLIES - PLANNING DEPT 65.39
26897 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CHAMBER MEMBERSHIP LUNCHEON - CITY HALL 96.OD
26898 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY THEATRE GRANT TO EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY THEATRE 1000.00
26899 CITY OF EDINA MARCH 86 TESTS - WATER DEPT 91.50
269D0 EMERGENCY SERVICE SYSTEM INC REPAIR ELECTRICAL WORK ON SQUAD CAR 533.65
26901 CHRIS ENGER APRIL 86 EXPENSES 165.00
26902 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC GRATE - SEWER OEPT PP8.00
26903 RON ESS HOCKEY OFFICIAL -FEES PD 387.50
26904 PATRICIA'S FRAME SHOP FRAMING TWO POSTERS - POLICE DEPT 91.16
26905 FINLEY BROS ENTERPRISES MOVE SOFTBALL BACKSTOP - ROUND LAKE PARK 750.OD
26906 FITNESS ASSOCIATES INC STRESS TEST - FIRE DEPT 3268.00
26907 FLYING CLOUD SANITARY LANDFILL TAX ON LANDFILL DISPOSAL 72.90
26908 FRANZ ENG REPRODUCTIONS INC SUPPLIES - PLANNING DEPT P6.02
3582256
j
(1086)
i
26909 G L CONTRACTING INC SERVICE -AUTUMN TERRACE/TWILIGHT TRAIL 1541.98
26910 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC RADIO REPAIR & PARTS 717.91
26911 GOOOYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTERS 12 TIRES - POLICE CARS 509.16
26912 W W GRAINGER INC STEEL LADDER - POLICE DEPT 176.13
3 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC BREAKER - P/W BLDG 7.36
2t..i4 GUNS & AMMO SUBSCRIPTION - POLICE DEPT 8.97
26915 HACH CD RUST REMOVER - WATER DEPT 89.45
26916 HALLOCK COMPANY INC REPAIR SIGNAL - WATER DEPT 36.40
26917 JOHN HANKEL SOFTBALL OFFICIAL - FEES PD 14.00
26918 HARMON GLASS WINOSHIELO - EQUIPMENT MAINT 205.45
26919 HARVEY HANSON REALTORS REFUND SEWER BILL 27.10
26920 ROGER HAWKINSON BASKETBALL OFFICIAL - FEES PO 78.00
26921 HEALY -RUFF CO 7 REMOTE SIREN OECOOERS - CIVIL OEFENSE 8116.50
26922 LAURIE HELLING MILEAGE 81.25
26923 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLICE SCHOOL - POLICE OEPT 70.00
26924 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLICE SCHOOL - POLICE DEPT 52.00
26925 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLICE SCHOOL - POLICE OEPT 468.00
26926 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER -1ST HALF TAXES 1986 - MORE HOUSE/MILLER 2373.62
PARK/HENDRICKSON
26927 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL CENTERS SCHOOL - FIRE OEPT 480.00
26928 HOFFER'S INC PAINT - PARK MAINTENANCE 213.40
26929 HUDSON MAP CO MAPS - WATER OEPT 181.85
26930 DONNY HYATT EXPENSES - POLICE OEPT 17.66
26931 KURT HYSTER HOCKEY OFFICIAL - FEES PD 170.50
26932 ICMA SUBSCRIPTION - CITY MANAGER 288.00
26933 IBM TYPEWRITER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT -POLICE 840.00
26934 IBM SERVICE - CITY HALL 424.32
26935 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #272 MARCH 86 CUSTOOIAL SERVICE 1536.44
26936 INTL ASSOC OF ASSESSING OFFICERS DUES - ASSESSING DEPT _ 75.00
26^17 DALE JANSEN BROOMBALL OFFICIAL - FEES PO 39.OD
2( 3 JM DFFICE PROOUCTS INC DFFICE SUPPLIES - WATER OEPT 164.37
26939 JM OFFICE PROOUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES - POLICE OEPT 283.79
26940 F F JEDLICKI INC SERVICE - SHAOY OAK ROAD 581.75
26941 JOHNSON PROOUCE REFUND PLUMBING PERMIT 85.50
26942 RUSSELL L JOHNSON FILTER CORP FILTER MATERIAL FOR WELL HOUSE VENTS 67.70
26943 CARL JULLIE EXPENSES 67.98
26944 JUSTUS LUMBER CO LUMBER - POLICE OEPT/WATER DEPT 168.62
26945 KARULF HARDWARE INC -BRUSHES/WIRE TIES/PLUGS/TAPE/OUTLET 454.25
STRIPS/BATTERIES/VALVE/ENAMEL PAINT/LADOER
26946 KOKESH ATHLETIC SUPPLIES INC BASES - ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 795.00
26947 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER BALLASTS - FIRE DEPT 46.99
26948 GUST LAGERQUIST & SONS INC SERVICE ELEVATOR - WATER DEPT 332.38
26949 LA HASS MFG & SALES INC REPAIR CRANE -EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 74.32
26950 RDBERT LAMBERT APRIL 86 EXPENSES 165.00
26951 LANCE SUPPLIES - LIQUOR STORES 100.20
26952 LANG PAULY & GREGERSDN LTD MARCH 86 LANOFILL LEGAL SERVICE 463.15
26953 BDB LANZI VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL - FEES PO 78.00
26954 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE - FLYING CLOUO SANITARY LANOFILL 4240.42
26955 OAVID LINOAHL MILEAGE - PLANNING OEPT 15.50
26956 LINHOFF COLOR PHOTO LAB PRINTING - ELECTION 43.00
26957 LOGIS MARCH 86 SERVICE 6051.83
26958 LORENZ BUS SERVICE INC SERVICE - COMMUNITY SERVICES 106.00
26959 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC SWEEPER PARTS - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 427.16
26960 MIKE MARUSHIN -SOCKET :DRENCHES/IMPACK EXTENSION/TUBING/ 99.30
CUTTER - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
i. J166
(1087)
26961 RANDY MASON HOCKEY OFFICIAL- FEES PD 407.50
26962 MASYS CORPORATION MAY 86 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 914.00
26963 BARBARA MATTSON SCUBA INSTRUCTOR - FEES PD 150.00
26964 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC EXPENSES - CITY HALL 23.33
2F"'5 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO OXYGEN - FIRE DEPT 52.08
24 5 MERIT/JULIAN GRAPHICS FORMS - BUILDING DEPT 410.19
26967 METRO PRINTING INC -FORMS/LETTERHEAD/ENVELOPES/POSTERS-POLICE 595.00
AND FIRE DEPT
26968 METROPOLITAN FIRE EQUIP CO -CHEMICALS -FIRE DEPT/PARK MAINTENANCE/ 441.40
COMMUNITY CENTER
26969 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM MAY 86 SEWER SERVICE 88039.96
26970 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM MARCH 86 SAC CHARGES 112860.00
26971 MID CENTRAL FIRE INC FILTER WASH HOSE NOZZLES - WATER DEPT 504.00
26972 MID CENTRAL FIRE INC SAFETY EQUIPMENT - WATER DEPT 258.00
26973 MIDLAND EQUIPMENT CO REPAIR 80X ON TANDEM TRUCK 50.00
26974 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 259.65
26975 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP - STREET DEPT 145.00
26976 MINNESOTA COMMUNICATIONS CORP APRIL 86 PAGER SERVICE - WATER DEPT 51.50
26977 MPLS AREA CHAPTER FILM RENTAL -COMMUNITY CENTER 12.00
26978 MPLS STAR & TRIBUNE CO EMPLOYMENT AD - PERSONNEL DIRECTOR 124.80
26979 MPLS STAR & TRIBUNE CO EMPLOYMENT AD - POLICE DEPT 85.00
26980 MINNESOTA 8AR SUPPLY INC MIX - LIQUOR STORE 53.30
26981 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC ADS - LIQUOR STORES 45.36
26982 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC EMPLOYMENT ADS - POLICE & COMMUNITY CENTER 144.60
26983 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP APRIL 86 SERVICE 36.25
26984 MINNESOTA WANNER CO GASKET/PARTS - FIRE DEPT 57.98
26985 MPH INDUSTRIES INC TEST RADAR - POLICE DEPT 36.85
26986 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO OIL FILTER - PARK MAINTENANCE 5.97
26987 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 25.46
26988 NORTHLAND BUSINESS COMMUNICATION REPAIR TAPE RECORDER - POLICE DEPT 63.00
24 ` NORWEST BANK MINNEAPOLIS NA SERVICE 29.58
2 _.) OCHS BRICK & TILE CO CEMENT - STREET DEPT 12.00
26991 OPUS CDRPDRATION REFUND METER DEPOSIT 98.48
26992 HARRY A ORTLOFF HOCKEY OFFICIAL - FEES PD 170.00
26993 PHOTOS INC PRINTS - FORESTRY DEPT 43.25
26994 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO PUBLIC SAFETY TRAILER - POLICE DEPT 203.70
26995 PITNEY BOWES -PRINT POWDER - COMMUNITY CENTER/FOLDING 232.80
MAINTENANCE - CITY HALL
26996 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN SEATINE FOR ROLLER/REPAIR RMOWERT-POLICE DEPT 193.05
26997 PRINT SHACK CARDS - FORESTRY DEPT/ATHLETIC COORDINATOR 147.98
26998 PRO TOOL GLASSES - STREET DEPT 25.00
26999 JOYCE PROVO MILEAGE 12.50
27000 QUALITY FITNESS FITNESS TESTING - COMMUNITY CENTER 60.00
27001 R & R SPECIALTIES INC SHARPEN ZAMBONI BLADES 66.50
27002 RADIO SHACK SWITCH/MIKE CLIPS - POLICE DEPT 11.31
27003 FRED RAZAVI VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL -FEES PD 39.0D
27004 WAYNE RICE REFUND DOG LICENSE 4.00
27005 ROAD RESCUE INC REPAIR GAS GAUGE/CHARGING SYSTEM-FIRE DEPT 46.50
27006 RUFFRIDGE -JOHNSON SEAL/GASKET/IMPELLER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 648.72
27007 ROBERT RYAN HOCKEY OFFICIAL - FEES PD 201.50
27008 JOHN SAMS MILEAGE - ASSESSING DEPT
27009 KURT SANDNESS HOCKEY OFFICIAL -FEES PD46.21
27010 SAVOIE SUPPLY CO INC TOWELS -P/W & PARKS DEPT 186.00
174.55
20850481
(1088)
4.
27011 SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM INC SERVICE - CITY HALL PLANNING 1795.98
27012 SHAKOPEE FORD INC SWITCH/FLYWHEEL/HANDLE -EQUIPMENT MAINT 101.74
27013 SHAKOPEE FORD INC -MOULDING/MIRROR/AXLE VENT/WINDOW GASKET/ 434.89
-BRAKE RELEASE/SWITCH/MANIFOLD/VACUMN
SWITCH
2:,. 4 FIRST TRUST COMPANY OF ST PAUL BOND PAYMENT 350225.00
27015 SHOW QUALITY PET PRODUCTS INC CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 10.35
27016 STEVEN R SINELL APRIL 86 EXPENSES 173.50 1
27017 STEVEN R SINELL 1986 DUES - ASSESSING DEPT 275.00
270I8 SMITH & NEPHEW ROLYNA INC CONTROLLED AREA SYMBOL - PARK MAINTENANCE 375.70
27019 SNAP ON TOOLS SAFETY GALSSES 32.70
27020 SNYDERS DRUG STORES INC SUPPLIES - POLICE DEPT 8.49
27021 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC EMPLOYMENT AD - FINANCE DEPT 72.00
27022 SPECIALTY SCREENING EMBLEMS - POLICE DEPT 24.00
27023 VOID CHECK 0.00
27024 SPORT WORLD STOP WATCH - FIRE DEPT P3.75
27025 SPORT WORLD RACQUETBALLS/RACQUETS/MOUTHGUARDS 1201.80
27026 STAHL CONSTRUCTION REFUND BUILDING PERMIT 642.50
27027 STANDARD SPRING CO REPAIR CAR SEAT - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 199.00
27028 STATE TREASURER MARCH 86 BUILDING SURCHARGE 7092.08
27029 STS CONSULTANTS LTD SERVICE - WATER PLANT EXPANSION 616.00
27030 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 172.19
27031 THOMPSON PLUMBING REFUND PLUMBING PERMIT 94.00
27032 TIMBERWALL LANDSCAPING INC TIMBERWALL - ROUND LAKE PARK 7664.00
27033 TRUCK & BUS GROUP 1986 GMC TRUCK - PARK MAINTENANCE 11980.08
27034 TWIN CITIES CHAPERS OF YOUNG AUDI CONCERT - HISTORICAL CULTURE 150.00
27035 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN - STREET DEPT 31.35
27036 TWIN CITY TESTING SOIL TESTS - VALLEY VIEW ROAD 24701.28
27037 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS - POLICE DEPT 989.70
27078 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED PARKA - FIRE DEPT 139.95
27( UNITED LABORATORIES INC STAINLESS STEEL POLISH - WATER DEPT 257.91
27G..j UNITOG RENTAL SERVICES COVERALLS - ENGINEERING DEPT 157.30
2704I UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CANINE SUPPLIES - POLICE DEPT 95.0D
27042 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC WASHERS/BOLTS & NUTS/SCREWS 440.96
27043 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE DUES - PLANNING DEPT P0.00
27044 U S WATER NEWS SUBSCRIPTION - WATER DEPT 22.40
27045 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE INC GAS CYLINDER - COMMUNITY CENTER 181.67
?7046 VAUGHNS INC FLAGS - ELECTION & WATER DEPT 126.73
27047 KEITH WALL EXPENSES 7.00
27048 VESSCO INC -CONNECTORS/GASKET/RING/DIAPHRAGN - WATER 891.71 '
DEPARTMENT
27049 VICOM INC HANDSET AMPLIFIER - P/W BLDG 65.00
?7050 VBI BUSINESS INTERIORS INC SHELVES - STREET DEPT 93.80
?7051 VIKING CHEVROLET CO 2 1986 VEHICLES - CITY MANAGER/SEWER DEPT 17006.90
27052 WATER PRODUCTS CO GASKET/PIPE/CHAMBER PLATE 1666.85
3D53 WILSON TANNER GRAPHICS -BUSINESS CARDS - COMMUNITY SERVICES / 54.OD
ATHLETIC COORDINATOR
3054 WINGFIELD PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING -REBUILD AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION - 610.51
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
'7O55 KEN WORDE HOCKEY OFFICIAL - FEES PD 434.00
7056 XEROX CORP SERVICE 170.OD
'7057 YELLOW PAGES AD - COMMUNNITY CENTER
'7058 ZACK'S INC -TOWELS/RAKES/BROOMS/SQUARE SHOVELS -
STREET DEPT 488.91
75.00
437 1268
(1089)
1059 ZIEBART AUTO TRUCK RUSTPROOFING CHECK RUSTPROOFING - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 75.00
'7f ' ZIEGLER TIRE SERVICE CO 2 TIRES - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 581.14
'7k STAR PLUMBING REFUND PLUMBING PERMIT 20.50
67664
$3011899.49
ti, I
(1090)
DISTRIBUTION BY FUND
MAY 6, 1986
A, GENERAL 252230.93
CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT 11729.83
15 LIQUOR STORE-P V N 50320.11
17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE 31976.46
30 CASH PARK FEES 400.00
31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP 8414.00
33 UTILITY BOND FUND 616.00
36 P/S Q P/W BOND FUND 65.00
44 UTILITY DEBT FUND 41.05
45 UTILITY DEBT FD ARB 258669.02
47 80 G 0 DEBT FUND 258561.96
51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 42543.82
52 IMPROVEMENT DEBT FUND 350038.53
55 IMPROVEMENT DEBT FUND ARB 901993.60
56 ROAD IMPROVEMENT DEBT FD 602565.56
73 WATER FUND 29541.58
77 SEWER.FUND 211789.98
81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 402.06
$3011899.49
(1091)