HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 07/16/1985SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
TUESDAY, JULY 16, 19,5 6:00 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING BOARDROOM
CITY STAFF: Assistant to the City Manager Craig
Dawson, and Human Services Coordinator
Jan Flynn-Calhoon
CONSULTANT (ORW, INC.)
lick Wolsfeld and Jeff Benson
I. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
II. OISCUSSION OF TRANSIT ALTERNATIVE (OPT-OUT) STUDY
A. Background
B. Review sf Study to Date
C. Discussion
I. Direction of Study
III. ADJOURNMENT.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
EDEN PRAIRIE
CITTaatit --AIENDA
7:31 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING BOARDROOM
Mayer Gary Petersen, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock and
Paul Redrath
Assistant to the City Manager Craig W.
Dawson; City Attorney Rick Resew;
Finance !Director John Frane; Senior
Planner Mike Franzen; Oirector
of Community Services Robert Lambert;
Director of Public Works Eugene A.
Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen
Michael
TUESDAY, JULY 16, 1445
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS Of BUSINESS
II. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. 2n4 Reading of Ordinance No. 2745, changing terms on
Historcal & Cultural Commission from 3 years -10 years
Page 154,
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,July 16, 1985
B. Final Plat approval and Special Assessment Agreement for Page 1551
Eames Addition Oolution No. 85-17-37—
C. Final Plat approval for Tanager Creek 2nd Addition (Resolution Page 1558
No. 85-174)
D. Contract Amendment No. li Anderson Lakes Parkway Improvement Page 1561
Project, TC.--52-033--
E. Receive Petition for Street Improvements Adjacent to Eames Page 1563
Addition and Authorize Preparation of a Feasibility Report,
I.C. 52-082 (Resoluton No. 85-176)
F. Final Approval for Housing Revenue Bonds in the amount of
o TIT,T00,000 for Tanager Creek (ResolutionNo.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. MOUNT CURVE ADDITION by Mount Curve Developers. Request for
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential
Page 1565
to Medium Density Residential on 2.24 acres, rezoning from Rural
to Rm-6.5 for 2.24 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 2.87 acres into
nine lots for seven townhouse units. Location: Southwest corner
of Franlo Road and Mount Curve Road. (Resolution No. 85-169 -
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; Ordinance No. 25-85 -
Rezoning; and Resolution No. 85-170 - Preliminary Plat)
B. CROSSROADS CENTER by Vantage Properties. Request for a Zoning p age
District Change from C-Regional to C-Regional Service on 2.99
acres, with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals,
Preliminary Plat of approximately 11.4 acres into one lot, one
outlot, and road right-of-way, for construction of a commercial
center. Location: East side of Highway #169, South and West
of Prairie Center Drive, North of Major Media (Ordinance No.
26-85 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 85-171 - Preliminary Plat)
IV. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 21341 - 21667
V. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
VI. PETITIONS REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request from Hustad Development Corporation regarding the
Hampton Inn Project
VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
VIII. APPOINTMENTS
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Commendation for July 4th Celebration
1583
Page 1595
Page 1603
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,July 16, 1985
B. Report of City Manager
C. Report of City Attorney
D. Report of Director of Public Works
1. Award contract for Utilities and Street Improvements for
Tanaqer Creek, I.C. 52-060 (Resolution No. 85-175)
X. NEW BUSINESS
XI. ADJOURNMENT
K. E. Schumacher
Aflmilev,01ww
14500 Vidiey View Road
Eden rhiirle, Alltle4041 55344
612MAUSBNN 937-8300
July 15, 1985
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Mayor and Councilpersons:
We are representatives of The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United
States (Equitable). Equitable is the owner of Outlots C and D, Edenvale 2nd
Addition.
We have been advised that David Ames, as owner of Lot 1, Block 4 and Outlot F,
Edenvale 2nd Addition has requested a feasibility report by the city for
putting in a roadway along the property lines. We have been advised that
such a report will take approximately 90 days and will cost approximately
$5,000 to $10,000. As Equitable, we object to the ordering of the feasibility
report as unnecessary expense. Our reasons for our objection are as follows:
1. Since Equitable and the previous owners have had an agreement (said
agreement assumed by the present owners) in the past for the installa-
tion of the road, its location and cost sharing, we prefer to put
the road in ourselves, with each owner paying his proportionate
share on a private rather than a publically assessed basis.
2. As the roadway location throughout the entire site owned by
Equitable is integral to the overall development plan of the
47 1' acres owned by Equitable, additional time for analysis is
needed to maximize the benefit to the property and hence to the
community to integrate the roadway with the overall plans,
including grading, cut and fill analysis and storm sewer require-
ments. A substantial portion of this work has been completed by
our engineers, with the balance being completed at this time.
KES/po
1/)/(
ur very truly,
11
11n, 1 1
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Page 2
*July 15, 1985
3. We believe it will be difficult at this time to arrive at a fair
public assessment of the benefits to Equitable on its property
adjacent to the proposed road, absent the time necessary to do a
thorough and thoughtful analysis of the property usage.
4. The cut and fill analysis and grading plan will be somewhat
determinative of storm sewer needs and capacities, which must be
integrated not only into this proposed roadway but also into
the Valley View Road upgrade plan.
5. It has been the policy of Equitable to do the necessary road
construction for its various properties privately, to minimize
the cost impact and to be able to co-ordinate with city staff the
ultimate end product.
6. We believe that satisfactory resolution of the roadway construction
can be worked out privately between the owners without the necessity
of city involvement on an assessment basis for the feasibility and
subsequent construction.
Equitable is prepared at this time to order its engineers to complete the drawings
necessary to let a contract for the roadway in question; Equitable is prepared
at this time, subject to the completion of the working drawings and bidding
documents to award a contract for the work. To do this, Equitable would require
only satisfactory evidence that the present owners of Lot 1, Block 4 and Outlot F,
Edenvale 2nd Addition are prepared to pay currently their one-half share of the
roadway, water service and storm sewer, in that said owners are obtaining sani-
tary sewer service by access to the existing sewer in Fairway Drive.
It is for the foregoing reasons that Equitable opposes any further action or
expense by the city at this time in connection with the proposed roadway
construction.
ORDINANCE NO. 27-85
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING
CITY CODE CHAPTER 2 BY AMENDING SECTION 2.18 RELATING TO THE
TERM OF HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL COMMISSION MEMBERS AND ADOPTING
BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 2.99 WHICH, AMONG
OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. City Code Chapter 2, Section 2.18, Subd. 1,
shall be and is amended to read as follows:
Subd. 1. Establishment and Composition. An Histor-
ical and Cultural Commission, composed of seven (7) members,
is hereby established for the purpose of advising the Council
as to activities, programs and facilities of historical and
cultural significance in the City. Commission members shall
serve staggered three-year terms. [Appointment of members for
terms commencing after March 1, 1985, shall be for terms of
two years. The terms for which members have been appointed
prior to March 1, 1985, shall be the remainder of the term
for which they were appointed.]
Section 2. City Code Chapter I entitled "General Provi-
sions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code
Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 are hereby
adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated
verbatim herein.
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from
and after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council Of
the City of Eden Prairie on the
day of
1985, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a
regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the
day of , 1985.
ATTEST:
.City Clerk Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the
, 1985.
day of
-2-
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-173
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
EAMES ADDITION
WHEREAS. the plat of Eames Addition has been submitted in a manner required
for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462
of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder,
and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY or EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for Eames Addition is approved upon
compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
report on this plat dated July 10, 1985.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A.
waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval
date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as
described in said engineer's report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the
above named plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on July 16. 1985.
ii:Wfi4:;on, Mayor
ATTEST
SEAL
TETI "CTJI:k"
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO:
Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM:
David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician
DATE:
July 10, 1985
SUBJECT:
EAMES ADDITION (formerly Quail Ridge and
Eden Prairie Apartments)
PROPOSAL: The Developer, David Ames, has requested City Council approval
of Eames Addition. This is a 6.6 acre site, located north of
Valley View road and west of the Edenvale Golf Course, in the
north ½ of Section 9, intended for the construction of a 108-
unit apartment building. Included in the plat is the dedication
of a 30-foot wide section of public roadway.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on
November 6, 1984, per Resolution No. 84-293.
Zoning to RM 2.5 was finally read and approved by the Council on
November 22, 1984, per Ordinance No. 122-84.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was
executed on January 22, 1985.
VARIANCES: Item 3. A. of the Developer's Agreement required approval from
the Board of Appeals for the types of exterior materials to be
used, if the type and amount of materials do not meet City Code
requirements. This requirement is to be satisfied prior to
release of the final plat.
A variance from the requirements of City Code 12.20, Subd. 2.
A., waiving the six-month maximum time elapse between the
approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final
plat will be necessary.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: All utilities, streets and walkways will be installed
in conformance with the requirements of the Developer's
Agreement. Prior to release of the final plat, the Developer
must commit to either private or public installation of the
improvements. (A special assessment agreement is being
proposed.)
A street name, approved by the Engineering Department, must be
included on the final plat prior to release.
Drainage and utility easements, in conformance with City Code
requirements, must be shown on the plat prior to release.
PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the
Developer's Agreement.
BONDING: The requirements for bonding are covered in the Developer's
Agreement.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Eames Addition
subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's
Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $305.00.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $1,404.00.
3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $4,320.00.
4. Satisfaction of item 3.A. of Developer's Agreement
(described under variances.)
5. Receipt of commitment for installation of municipal
utilities (special assessment agreement.)
6. Satisfaction of bonding requirements.
7. Addition of easements to plat.
8. Addition of acceptable street name to plat.
DLO:km
cc: David Ames
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
H NNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-173
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
EAMES ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of Eames Addition has been submitted in a manner required
for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462
of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder,
and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for Eames Addition is approved upon
compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
report on this plat dated July 10, 1985.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A.
waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval
date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as
described in said engineer's report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the
above named plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on July 16, 1985.
Gary 0. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO:
Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician
DATE: July 10, 1985
SUBJECT: EAMES ADDITION (formerly Quail Ridge and
Eden Prairie Apartments)
PROPOSAL: The Developer, David Ames, has requested City Council approval
of Eames Addition. This is a 6.6 acre site, located north of
Valley View road and west of the Edenvale Golf Course, in the
north of Section 9, intended for the construction of a 108-
unit apartment building. Included in the plat is the dedication
of a 30-foot wide section of public roadway.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on
November 6, 1994, per Resolution No. 84-293.
Zoning to PM 2.5 was finally read and approved by the Council on
November 22, 1984, per Ordinance No. 122-84.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was
executed on January 22, 1985.
VARIANCES: Item 3. A. of the Developer's Agreement required approval from
the Board of Appeals for the types of exterior materials to be
used, if the type and amount of materials do not meet City Code
requirements. This requirement is to be satisfied prior to
release of the final plat. -
A variance from the requirements of City Code 12.20, Subd. 2.
A., waiving the six-month maximum time elapse between the
approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final
plat will be necessary.
UTILITIES AND STRHTS: All utilities, streets and walkways will be installed
in conformance with the requirements of the Developer's
h ,jrcmcnt_ Prior to release of the final plat, thy Developer
must csmmsit to either private or public in•Aallation of the
itvrovoCntS. (A special iisc.ssmvnt a‘jrcont is being
pr000sed.)
A street nme, approved by the Engineering Department, must be
included on the final plat prior to release.
Drainage and utility easements, in conformance with City Code
requirements, must be shown on the plat prior to release.
PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered In the
Developer's Agreement.
BONDING: The requirements for bonding are covered in the Developer's
Agreement.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Eames Addition
subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's
Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $305.00.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $1,404.00.
3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $4,320.00.
4. Satisfaction of item 3.A. of Developer's Agreement
(described under variances.)
5. Receipt of commitment for installation of municipal
utilities (special assessment agreement.)
6. Satisfaction of bonding requirements.
7. Addition of easements to plat.
8. Addition of acceptable street name to plat.
OLD: km
cc: David Ames
AGREEMENT REGARDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
THIS IS AN AGREEMENT made this day of July, 1985,
between the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation (the
"City"), and Eames Apartments Limited Partne
r
s
h
i
p
(
t
h
e
"Owners").
A. The Owner holds legal and equitable title to Lot
1
,
Block 1, Eames Addition, County of Hennepin, State o
f
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
,
which property is the subject of this agreement an
d
i
s
h
e
r
e
i
n
-
after referred to as the "Property".
B. The Owner desires to develop the Property in such
a
manner that will require the construction of a road
a
p
p
u
r
t
e
n
a
n
t
to the westerly border of the Property, including but no
t
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
to, concrete curb and gutter and storm sewer, cat
c
h
b
a
s
i
n
s
a
n
d
manholes (the "Improvements").
C. The parties hereto desire to enter into an agreem
e
n
t
concerning the financing of the construction of the
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
all of which will inure to the benefit of the Propert
y
.
AGREEMENTS
IT IS HEREBY agreed as follows:
1. The Owner consents to the levying of assessments aga
i
n
s
t
the Property for the construction of the Improvements
.
2. The cost to be assessed against the Property for t
h
e
construction of the Improvements will not exceed one
-
h
a
l
f
(
i
)
o
f
the cost to construct a collector street road to a width of 32
-1-
feet as such road abuts the Property including concrete cu
r
b
a
n
d
gutter and storm sewer, catch basin and manholes. The a
c
t
u
a
l
cost shall be determined by a feasibility report, subject to
C
i
t
y
Council approval. Should any of the cost of the Improvemen
t
s
b
e
paid for by state or federal funds, the City shall take
i
n
t
o
account in assessing the Property such federal and state fu
n
d
s
,
if and to the extent other properties being assessed fo
r
t
h
e
improvement of the road described in this paragraph also re
c
e
i
v
e
the benefit of state and federal funding in their assess
m
e
n
t
.
The assessments shall be spread uniformally over five (5)
y
e
a
r
s
and shall bear such interest rate as is allowed by law.
3. The City's assessment records for the Property will show
the assessments as pending assessments.
4. The Owner waives notice of any assessment hearing to be
held at which hearing or hearings the assessments are to b
e
c
o
n
-
sidered by the City Council and thereafter approved and lev
i
e
d
.
Notwithstanding this waiver of notice, the City shall give
n
o
t
i
c
e
of the assessment hearing in the same manner in which it w
o
u
l
d
have were it not for this agreement, provided, however,
t
h
e
failure of the City to give notice shall not affect the val
i
d
i
t
y
of any assessments or give rise to any appeal or challenge t
o
t
h
e
assessments or this agreement.
5. The Owner concurs that the benefit to the Property by
virtue of the Improvem-nts to be constructed will excve
d
t
h
e
amount of the asse s sments to be levied against the Property. The
Owner waives all rights it has by virtue of Minnesota S
t
a
t
u
t
e
-2-
165'1
§429.081 or otherwise to challenge the amount or validity of the
assessments or the procedure used by the City in apportioning the
assessments and hereby release the City, its officers, its agents
and employees from any and all liability related to and arising
out of the impositions or the levying of the assessments.
6. At such time as the Improvements described herein are
constructed and completed, the City shall release the Property
from this special assessment agreement.
7. This agreement shall be effective immediately.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
A Municipal Corporation
BY:
Gary Peterson
Its Mayor
BY:
Carl J. Jullie
Its City Manager
EAMES APARTMENTS
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
A Limited Partnership
BY:
Its
-3-
Notary Public
tel ' ,4 JANET SCHROEDER SMITH
rt NoTAFIY Punt IC UNNE SOT A
ANOKACOUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of July, 1985, by Gary Peterson and Carl J. Julie, the
M
a
y
o
r
and City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal
c
o
r
p
o
-
ration, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of July, 1985, by , a general
partner, on behalf of Eames Apartments Limited Partnershi
p
,
a
limited partnership.
This Document was drafted by
Lang, Pauly & Gregerson, Ltd.
4108 IDS Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
-4-
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-174
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
TANAGER CREEK 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of Tanager Creek 2nd Addition has been submitted in a manner
required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under
Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had
thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF [DEN
PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for Tanager Creek 2nd Addition is
approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City
Engineer's report on this plat dated July 9, 1935.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A.
waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval
date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as
described in said engineer's report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the
above named plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on July 16, 1985.
Gary D. Peter:ion, Mayor
ATTEST
SEAL
John D. fronr, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician
DATE: July 9, 1985
SUBJECT: TANAGER CREEK 2ND ADDITION
PROPOSAL: The Developer, Centurion Company, has requested City Council
approval of the final plat of Tanager Creek 2nd Addition. The
plat, located west of Baker Road in the north ½ of Section 3,
contains approximately 38 acres intended for the construction of
186 attached single family units (RM 6.5) and is a replat of
Outlots B, C, and D, Tanager Creek.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on August
17, 1982, per Resolution No. 82-189.
Zoning to RM 6.5 was finally read and approved by the City
Council on March 1, 1983, per Ordinance No. 82-20.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was
executed on March 1, 1983.
VARIANCES: A variance from the requirements of City Code 12.20, Subd. 2.
A., waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the
approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final
plat will be necessary.
All other variance requests must be processed through the Board
of Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: Publicly owned and maintained utilities, streets and
walkways will be installed under a City Improvement Contract.
All privately owned utilities and streets will be installed by
the Developer in conformance with City standards.
Additional drainage and utility easements, necessary for the
construction of public utilities, should be coordinated with the
Engineering Department and shown on the final plat prior to
release.
PARK DEDICATION: A conservation easement, covering the flood plain area of
Purgatory Creek north of Edenvale Boulevard (Lot I, Block 3)
will be required. This area should also be shown on the final
plat as a drainage and utility easement.
BONDING: Bonding will conform to City Code requirements.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Tanager Creek 2nd
Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the
Developer's Agreement and the following:
I. Receipt of Engineering fee in the amount of $7,440.00.
2. Satisfaction of easement requirements.
3. Receipt of conservation easement document described in park
dedication.
DLO:km
cc: Ron Bastyr
Paul Pearson
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-174
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
TANAGER CREEK 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of Tanager Creek 2nd Addition has been submitted in a manner
required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under
Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had
thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for Tanager Creek 2nd Addition is
approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City
Engineer's report on this plat dated July 9, 1985.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A.
waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval
date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as
described in said engineer's report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the
above named plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on July 16, 1985.
tTFT5:—PTiTri-ton , ti7;37cTta
ATTEST SEAL
John D. Frame, Clerk
CITY or corN PRAIRIE
ENMNEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician
DATE: July 9, 1985
SUBJECT: TANAGER CREEK ?ND ADDITION
PROPOSAL: The Developer, Centurion Company, has requested City Council
approval of the final plat of Tanager Creek 2nd Addition. The
plat, located west of Baker Road in the north 1,1 of Section 3,
contains approximately 38 acres intended for the construction of
186 attached single family units (RM 6.5) and is a replat of
Outlets B, C, and D, Tanager Creek.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on August
17, 1982, per Resolution No. 82-189.
Zoning to RM 6.5 was finally read and approved by the City
Council on March 1, 1983, per Ordinance No. 82-20.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was
executed on March 1, 1983.
VARIANCES: A variance from the requirements of City Code 12.20, Subd. 2.
A., waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the
approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final
plat will be necessary.
All other variance requests must be processed through the Board
of Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: Publicly owned and maintained utilities, streets and
walkways will be installed under a City Improvement Contract.
All privately owned utilities and streets will he installed by
the Developer in conformance with City standards.
Additional drainage and utility casements, nece-,sary for the
construction of rublic utilities, should be coordinated with the
Engineering Department and shown on the final plat prior to
release.
PARK DEDICATION: A conservation easement, covering the flood plain area Of
Purgatory Creek north of Edenvale Boulevard (Lot 1, Block 3)
will be required. This area should also be shown on the final
plat as a drainage and utility easement.
BONDING: Bonding will conform to City Code requirements.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Tanager Creek 2nd
Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the
Developer's Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of Engineering fee in the amount of $7,440.00.
2. Satisfaction of easement requirements.
3. Receipt of conservation easement document described in park
dedication.
OLD: km
cc: Ron Bastyr
Paul Pearson
CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. I
TO CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR
IC /52-035, ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY
THI69 TO MITCHELL ROAD
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
July, 1985
8ENNETT-RINGROSE-WOLSFELO-JARVIS-GARDNER, INC.
700 Third Street South
Minneapolis, MN 55415
The following work shall be added by contract amendment to this project.
SCHEDULE A
ADDITIONS
: Item
No. Item
1. Mobilization
2. Granular Borrow
Unit
I.. S.
C .Y.
Estimated Unit
Quantity Price Amount
1.00 52,000.00 S 2,000.00
40,000.00 $ 1.85 $ 74 000.00
TOTAL ADDITIONS SCHEDULE 4k S 76,000.00
The Contractor hereby agrees to not make a claim of any kind for
any other costs or expenses which he may have incurred for work
performed up to the date of this agreement, but reserves its right
to make a claim for damages suffered in the future, including but
not limited, damages caused by any past or future delays on the
project. Contractor preserves its right to counter claim against
or bring in as a third party the Owner in any action for the purpos
e
s
of contribution or indemnity for any claims made against the Contra
c
-
tor relating to the project. Owner agrees to abolish the originall
y
scheduled completion date of August 1, 1985, and to establish a ne
w
,
reasonable completion date.
Page 1 of 2
NECESSITY FOR AMENDMENT
( SCHEDULE A
Item 1 - The mobilization cost Is the result of remobIllzatIon of equip-
ment and manpower due to the delay created by a lack of gra-
nular backlit! material.
Item 2 - Granular Borrow material became necessary for backfIlling sub-
cuts when It was determined that backfill material from oommon
excavation was Inadequate due to high moisture contents and an
Insufficient amount of granular material was found.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
$1,922,270.18
TOTAL PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMENDMENTS
0.00
SUBTOTAL
$1,922,270.18
TOTAL ADDITIONS CONTRACT AMENDMENT it $ 762062.100
CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE ri79V8-•-M-1 it
CONTRACTOR , r-)
Richard Knut on, Inc._
Title Date
ENGINEER
Bennett -Ringrose -Woisfeld -Jarvis -Gardner, Inc
Title _ 0, 24P5. Date
EDEN PRAIRIE
City Engineer Date
Page 2 of 2
156,A
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 85-176
RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND
ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR EAMES ADDITION
WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed
t
o
m
a
k
e
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
Improvements:
1.C. 52-082, Street Improvements Adjacent to Eames Addit
i
o
n
and assess the benefitted property for all or a portio
n
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
s
t
o
f
t
h
e
improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
:
That the proposed improvements be referred to the City
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
f
o
r
study with the assistance of BRW, Inc., and that a fea
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
r
e
p
o
r
t
shall be prepared and presented to the City Cou
n
c
i
l
w
i
t
h
a
l
l
convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary
w
a
y
a
s
t
o
t
h
e
scope, cost assessment and feasibility of the proposed im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 16, 1985
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, CiC1crk
..7" . . L. ! ..• . .7,
)11%:,;D% FZ:T.
10 7:ailie City
c-7.crs erein tLe City
Co -.:ncil. to cc! theol)c.ri? tE1F-1
(C.Entra) 14icaticm)
rc..er
_X_ ,Sic.rr
.x_ TAvinsi
C.11.rr
C'ther
7•4nrn of
7: .1c od
Adjacent to Lot_1,__Bloc10,_Eames Addition
as proposed in that certain Plat for the same
vcc C: :s
T: y
Lot 3,, Block 1, Eames Addition
_ (as proposed)
EPAESAPARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Its General -Partner
Pipq
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNLPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-169
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
a
n
d
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and,
WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted t
o
t
h
e
M
e
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
f
o
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
and comment; and,
WHEREAS, the proposal of Mount Curve D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
s
f
o
r
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
M
o
u
n
t
Curve Addition for Medium Density Res
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
t
h
e
a
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
Plan; .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
o
f
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
,
Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendme
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
a
s
f
o
l
l
o
w
s
:
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
2
.
2
4
acres located at the southwest quadr
a
n
t
o
f
F
r
a
n
i
°
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
M
o
u
n
t
C
u
r
v
e
R
o
a
d
b
e
modified from Low Density Residential
t
o
M
e
d
i
u
m
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
. Residential.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Pr
a
i
r
i
e
t
h
i
s
1
6
t
h
d
a
y
o
f
J
u
l
y
,
1
9
8
5
.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
66,C,
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #85-170
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF MOUNT CURVE ADDITION
FOR MOUNT CURVE DEVELOPERS
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Mount Curve Addition, for Mount Curve Developers, dated
June 3, 1985, consisting of 2.87 acres into ten lots for eight townhouse units, a
copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the
provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments
thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 16th day of July, 1985.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: June 7, 1985
PROJECT: Mount Curve Addition
APPLICANT/
PIE OWNER: Mount Curve Developers
LOCATION: Southwest quadrant of the intersection of Mount Curve Road
a
n
d
Franlo Road.
REQUEST:
Background
1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential
to Medium Density Residential on 2.24 acres.
2. Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 2.24 acres.
3. Preliminary Plat of 2.88 acres into nine lots.
The Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts 44
this site as Low Density Residential
land use for up to 2.5 units per
acre. The Comprehensive Guide Plan '
depicts surrounding land uses as
Medium Density Residential to the
north, Low Density Residential to
the east and south, and Quasi-Public
Open Space (Olympic Hills Golf
Course) to the west.
The existing natural site character-
istics can generally be described as
sloping from a high point at
elevation 870 along the west
property line, to a low point at
elevation 848 adjacent to Franlo
Road, with approximately 75% tree
coverage. The primary vegetative
type is box elder, with some elm,
oak, cherry, and cottonwood. There
are six significant oak trees
located in the north central
portion, with sizes varying between
77 -39
R.13 5
. PROPOSED SlTE----1
• - „ ,
11 II
K‘,< AREA LCCAT:ON MAP
Mount Curve Addition 2 June 7, 1985
25 to 44 inches in diameter. The attached memo from Stuart Fox, City Fores
t
e
r
,
indicates that four of the trees are in very good condition and would live
f
o
r
approximately 150 to 200 years. Two oak trees, adjacent to Lots 1 and 2, ar
e
i
n
very poor condition, and the life expectancy would, at best, be one to two years.
Comprehensive Guide Plan Change
The proponents are requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Den
s
i
t
y
Residential to Medium Density Residential. Based upon a net developable acreag
e
o
f
2.24 acres, the Comprehensive Guide Plan would allow up to 5.6 units. The pro
p
o
s
e
d
density of the site would be 3.13 units per acre. As part of the substantiatio
n
o
f
the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change, the proponents have included a typical si
n
g
l
e
family layout, with a cul-de-sac and five units. The preliminary plans ind
i
c
a
t
e
that additional grading would be required for this layout and would chang
e
t
h
e
site's natural character dramatically, with the clear cutting of trees an
d
t
h
e
creation of two drainage pockets. Additional grading would also be necessa
r
y
t
o
accommodate sanitary sewer elevations.
The multiple family use of the site makes sense, since the clustering of the
u
n
i
t
s
would allow more of the existing site character to be preserved. In addition
t
o
t
h
e
saving of five out of six large oak trees on-site, a large stand of the box
e
l
d
e
r
trees would remain as a tree mass.
Site Plan
The site plan involves the preliminary platting of 2.88 acres into nine lots. Se
v
e
n
lots would be for the proposed townhouse units, with one lot as the common are
a
.
The existing golf course maintenance building would be subdivided from this site a
n
d
combined with the golf course.
The site plan involves the construction of seven townhouse units at a net densit
y
o
f
3.13 units per acre, or 0.63 units above the Comprehensive Guide Plan densi
t
y
.
Buildings are located on-site, meeting minimum setback requirements for building
a
n
d
parking. A double garage is provided for each of the units.
Primary access to this site would be via three driveways proposed to access M
o
u
n
t
Curve Road. Individual driveways serve units on Lots 1 and 2 on the western por
t
i
o
n
of the site, and a common driveway provides access to five townhouse units fa
c
i
n
g
Franlo Road. The location of the easterly driveway entrance is 125 feet back
f
r
o
m
Franlo Road. This should not present problems with traffic circulation and adeq
u
a
t
e
room for stacking is provided. Although Clubhouse Road and the easterly driv
e
w
a
y
entrance are only offset 60 feet, Staff would not expect a cross-weaving of tra
f
f
i
c
since Clubhouse Road is a dead-end street, and the majority of traffic leaving
t
h
i
s
site would utilize Franlo Road.
. Grading
Compared to a single family layout, total grading on this site would be consid
e
r
a
b
l
y
less for a multiple family use. A large area of undisturbed tree mass wou
l
d
b
e
retained in the southwest corner of the site, as well as preserving five of th
e
s
i
x
large oak trees. Even with the use of walkout units, up to 14 feet of fill will be
necessary for units along Franlo Road. Grading along the west property line will
remove a significant amount of vegetation, which serves as a natural buffer b
e
t
w
e
e
n
PqA
Mount Curve Addition 3 June 7, 1985
the existing maintenance building and proposed units on this site. If these two
buildings were moved in an easterly direction to preserve the existing trees as a
natural buffer, proposed grading would either remove or potentially damage the two
nearest oak trees. Mass plantings should be required along the western
boundary
line where grading has removed the existing natural buffer.
Utilities
Sewer and water service can be provided to this site by connection to the exist
i
n
g
sewer and water lines in Franlo Road.
Two storm water pipes will be constructed as part of the storm sewer improvement
s
t
o
this project. Utility easements will be required over both storm sewer pipes.
Landscape Plan
The landscape plan has been prepared in compliance with the landscape ordinance
i
n
terms of total caliper inches and sizes of proposed plant materials. It prov
i
d
e
s
for a transition to existing single family uses across Franlo Road to the eas
t
o
f
the site, and to the south of the site, with a four-foot high berm and
m
a
s
s
coniferous plantings between six to twelve feet in height, planted 15 feet on-
center. Since grading is removing a portion of the natural vegetation on
t
h
e
western border of the site, the landscape plan should be revised to include
m
a
s
s
plantings to screen the maintenance building.
Architecture
Seven townhouse units, ranging between 1,500 to 1,700 square feet in size,
a
r
e
proposed for this site. Three buildings are proposed, with two to three unit
s
p
e
r
building. Primary exterior building materials will be brick and wood. All
u
n
i
t
s
will be 1-story walkouts, with the upper elevations facing Mount Curve Road a
n
d
Franlo Road, and the lower elevations facing the interior of the lot.
Conclusions
The decision to change the Comprehensive Guide Plan should be based upon t
h
e
following criteria:
1. Does the change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan, change the Comprehensive
Guide Plan balance?
2. Is the use of the property compatible with surrounding existing land uses?
3. Is the type of the proposed land use an appropriate use of the site?
The Comprehensive Guide Plan currently would allow up to n units per acre, or fo
r
a
site of this s17e (2.24 acres), a total of 5.6 units. A change in the Comprehensive
Guide Plan to permit an additional 1.4 units total, or about 0.65 units p
e
r
a
c
r
e
more, would not change the Comprehensive Guide Plan balance, nor would the d
e
n
s
i
t
i
e
s
be inconsistent with the Medium Density land uses approved to the north of M
o
u
n
t
Curve Road (4 do/acre). The density of the site, at 3.13 units per acre, w
o
u
l
d
b
e
higher than adjacent Low Density guided areas; however, with the am
o
u
n
t
o
f
landscaping proposed and existing trees saved, the project would appear le
s
s
d
e
n
s
e
than if the property were developed in a traditional manner for five single f
a
m
i
l
y
homes.
Mount Curve Addition 4 June 7, 1985
The use of the property for multiple family housing makes sense, since a traditional
approach to a single family subdivision would require a significant amount of
grading and substantially alter the natural characteristics of this site, of which
the tree cover is the dominant characteristic. Use of multiple family units
clustered in certain locations allow for five of the six mature oak trees to be
saved, and a majority of the natural vegetative stand to be preserved in the
southwest corner of the site. If the use of the property is appropriate for
multiple family, then a decision must be made as to what intensity of development
should be permitted. An earlier plan for this site involved eight units; however,
the additional unit made the site plan appear tight and would result in the loss of
five of the six oak trees. Staff recommended to the proponent that the number of
units be reduced from eight to seven on the property. The appropriateness of
development intensity on the property is also dependent upon how well the site
transitions to adjacent land uses. In addition to density transitions, there should
be visual and architectural transitions. Staff feels that although the buildings
are somewhat larger than traditional single family homes, there is open space
between the units and in front of the garages, facing the single family neighborhood
across Franlo Road to the east, which helps break up the views of the building mass.
Though the units are architecturally different from traditional single family homes,
they exhibit typical residential characteristics including varying rooflines, a
mixture of brick and wood materials, and staggered building fronts.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change
from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential, a Preliminary Plat of
2.88 acres into nine lots, and a Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5, on 2.24 acres based
on plans, Staff-dated June 3, 1985, subject to the recommendations of the Staff
Report, dated June 7, 1985, and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Modify the landscape plan to provide plantings along the west
property line, to create a visual transition between the golf course
storage building and the westerly townhouse unit.
2. Prior to Final Plat, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off and utility plans for review by
the City Engineering Department.
C. Provide proper utility easements for new utilities as determined
necessary by the City Engineer.
3. Prior to Building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
B. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading.
Mount Curve Addition 5 June 7, 1985
C. Stake the grading limits with a snow fence, and provi
d
e
s
n
o
w
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
around the drip lines of the oak trees to be sav
e
d
.
S
i
n
c
e
t
h
e
number of existing oak trees on-site is few, oak
t
r
e
e
s
r
e
m
o
v
e
d
outside of the grading limits shall be replaced on a
s
q
u
a
r
e
i
n
c
h
p
e
r
square inch basis, according to the area of a circl
e
c
r
e
a
t
e
d
b
y
a
cross sectional cut through the diameter of a tree
a
s
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
d
4
11
feet above the ground.
MEMO
TO: Mike Franzen
• FROM: Stu Fox
DATE: May 16,1935
SUBJECT: Oak trees on Mount Curve Addition
At your request I have examined the six large bur oak
t
r
e
e
s
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
corner of Mount Curve Road and Frani° Road, In general,
t
h
e
t
r
e
e
s
w
e
r
e
f
o
u
n
d
to be in the following condition, except as noted:
- Trees appeared to be in generally good to very good hea
l
t
h
.
- Scattering of dead limbs and branches is normal. T
h
i
s
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
i
s
caused by corapeting and shading from adjacent trees.
- Trees are approximately 180 to 240 years old. (Life ex
p
e
c
t
a
n
c
y
f
o
r
a
bur oak is 300 - 400 years.)
- With the exception of tree #5 the trees do not have any
m
a
j
o
r
s
t
r
u
c
t
-
ural problems.
SPECIFICS ON THE INDIVIDUAL TREES
Tree VI.- Bur Oak 37 inch diameter: Height 50 feet: Crown
s
p
r
e
a
d
6
0
f
e
e
t
.
Fill around base of tree may be contributing to dieback o
n
w
i
d
e
l
y
scattered branches.
General condition - very good.
Tree 02- Our Oak 32 inch diameter: Height 60 feet: Crown
s
p
r
e
a
d
7
0
f
e
e
t
.
General condition - very good.
Tree #3- Bur Oak 38 inch diameter: Height 60 feet: Crow
n
s
p
r
e
a
d
7
0
f
e
e
t
.
Four or five dead lower limbs-however good callus growth
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
.
General condition - very good.
Tree #4- Our Oak 38 inch diameter: Height 50 feet: Cro
w
n
s
p
r
e
a
d
7
0
f
e
e
t
.
General condition - very good.
Tree #5- Our Oak 44 inch diameter-twin crown. Height 50
f
e
e
t
:
C
r
o
w
n
s
p
r
e
a
d
BO feet.
Basal area of one trunk is wounded and signs of rot ar
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
in the trunk. Crown leaf distribution is sparse. Epicormic
shoots are present on one of the twin forks.
General condition - fair.
Tree #6- Our Oak 25 inch diameter: Height 50 feet: Crown spread
4
0
f
e
e
t
.
Epicormic shoots are present on trunk.
General condi ton - fair to poor.
T6
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION June 17, 1905
-3-
MOTION: Kingrey made a motion recommending that when Rowland Road
Ts upgraded, an B' asphalt bikeway be constructed along Rowland
Road for access to the neighborhood park from residential
subdivisions that will be developed north of Rowland Road and
giving pedestrians safe access to the Bryant Lake Regional Park
Entrance located in the area of Garden Road. Gonyea seconded the
motion and it passed 4-0.
B. Mount Curve Addition
Refer to staff report dated April 19, 1985.
Lambert reported that this is a small subdivision of less than two
acres across Franlo Road and Golf View Drive. There are a number
of trees located on the site including four major oak trees. The
developer will save three of the oak trees and is requesting a
zoning change from low density residential to medium density
residential. lie recommends approval since there are no issues to
discuss other than the trees.
Kingrey said that there appears to be a lot of fill being done and
asked if there would be fill around the oak trees. Lambert said •
although there will be cutting and filling, the grading plan will'
be changed because of the oak trees.
Kingrey said he has some concern with the expense of filling around
the oak trees which could kill them.
Cook referred to the left rear southwestern coiner of the site and
asked if this would remain in its natural state. Lambert said yes,
since this is a difficult area to build on.
Kingrey referred to the last sentence in the staff report which
says "Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in
advance of grading or tree removal" and said this sentence is the
same in every development proposal. Lambert said this means that
approvals have already been made but that construction fencing and
erosion control fencing should be put up prior to grading.
Cook asked what the penalty is when a developer does not notify the
City prior to grading or tree removal. Lambert said they are red
tagged and stopped which costs the developer more money when they
hire machinery to come in and have to get them back a second time.
If a tree that was supposed to be saved is removed, the developer
Is required to replace the tree circumference inch per
circumference inch.
MOTION: Cook moved to recommend approval of the Mount Curve
Aadftion per staff recommendations. Gonyea seconded the motion and
It passed 4-0.
VI. REPORTS OF COMMISSIONERS, BOARDS AO STAFF
A. Report of Superintendent of Recreation
1. Monthly Community Center Report
1,37q
loom
B. MOUNT CURVE ADDITION, by Mount Curve Developers. Request for
Comprehensive Guido Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential t
o
Medium Density Residential on 2.24 acres, rezoning from Rural to
R
M
-
6.5 for 2.24 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 2.87 acres into ten lot
s
for eight townhouse units. Location: Southwest corner of Frani
°
Road and Mount Curve Road. A continued public hearing.
Ms. Laurie Johnson, engineer for proponent, and Mr. Bill Hayek, att
o
r
n
e
y
f
o
r
proponent, reviewed the plans and reasons for the proposed Comp
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Guide Plan Amendment with the Commission. Mr. Hayek stated that p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
s
had reviewed the Planning Commission proposed option to relo
c
a
t
e
t
h
e
driveway access directly across from Clubhouse Road, but had foun
d
t
h
a
t
i
t
caused the loss of a large oak tree in that vicinity and that it wo
u
l
d
c
a
u
s
e
a sharp angle in the driveway on the site. Mr. Hayek noted th
a
t
,
i
n
response to the concerns of the neighbor to the north, proponent
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
sloping the driveway down at a steeper slope to avoid headlight
s
b
e
a
m
i
n
g
directly into windows of his home. He stated that the proponent
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
adding screening to the southwest border in order to more effectiv
e
l
y
s
c
r
e
e
n
the units from the single family home to the south.
Mr. Hayek stated that a meeting had been hold with surrounding re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
i
n
the area, at which time many of the quest ions raised by reside
n
t
s
a
t
t
h
e
last mot.ine had been ansi.eirod. Reeording architectural control,
M
r
.
H
a
y
e
k
noted that the residents to the west reeeested that this p
r
o
j
e
c
t
b
e
constructed with cedar routine shineles. He stated that the ho
m
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
FOS
Planning Commission Minutes 4 June 24, 1935
north, south, and east all had asphalt shingles, therefore, the proponents
had decided to offer cedar shakes as an option for the roofing material.
Bye asked about restrictive covenants for the project. Mr. Hayek responded
that the covenants and restrictions were being drawn up at this time. The
builder for all the units would be the same builder, thereby assuring
uniformity in the construction and style of the buildings. He stated that
the price range of the units would be $150-175,000.
Hallett asked if the Olympic Hills architectural review committee would be
reviewing the development. Planner Enger explained that this development
was not part of Olympic Hills. It had been a suggestion at the previous
meeting that this project be reviewed by that committee as a "good faith"
gesture toward fitting into the neighborhood. Since this project was part
of Olympic Hills, the committee would not have veto power over the
development, but conditions they would suggest may be helpful. Planner
Enger stated that a letter from the committee regarding their review would
be sufficient for Staff.
'Hallett asked if proponents would be willing to submit the plans to the
Olympic Hills architectural review committee. Mr. Hayek stated that he
would.
Marhula asked how drainage would be handled for the site. Ms. Johnson
reviewed the connections planned.
Marhula stated that, with respect to the land use and density, he was
concerned developers in the City were assuming that it was a foregone
conclusion that clustering units within an area designated for Low Density
Residential use automatically meant that density could be increased. He
stated that he had no difficulties with the type of units planned for the
site, that it was better plan in terms of preservation of natural features.
However, density was another question. He stated that he felt six units
would work well on this site, too, perhaps mitigating some of the concerns
of the design of the project such as proximity to the single family home to
the south, location of the drive access, and preservation of trees. Marhula
stated that some developers give the argument that the added density is
needed to spread costs more evenly acrpss the property. Marhula stated that
he did not feel that would be the case for this small development. Gartner
concurred.
Mr. Hayek stated that originally eight units had been proposed on the site.
He added that he felt development costs would be a problem for this project,
if the density were decreased.
Mr. Robert Hawkinson, 9505-15 Clubhouse Road, stated that he was not
concerned about the looks of the structures. He reiterated his concerns
from the previous meeting regarding the need to eliminate box elder trees,
and, therefore, box elder hues, concern about peak hour traffic in the area,
and concern about the lights from the driveway throne') the site shining into
his home.
Johannes asked if Staff had determined whether Me. Hawkinson would he
affected by the headlights from the driveway, or not. Planner Franzen -
161&
Planning Commission Minutes 5 June 24, 1985
stated that the plans would have to be reviewed, as well as the berm in
front of Mr. Hawkinson's home, in order to determine whether there was a
problem, or not. He stated that the headlights would most likely hit a
second story window of the house.
Johannes asked if trees would be lost with relocation of the driveway to
match up with the intersection of Clubhouse Road and Mount Curve Road.
Planner Franzen stated that the trees would probably not be damaged, but
that Staff would want to review the extent of grading necessary to
accomplish the relocated road.
Mr. R. S. Gillman, 10861 Mount Curve Road, stated that the developer had
held a meeting of the neighborhood, which had answered many of the questions
raised by his neighbors at the last meeting. He stated that he felt the
developer had mitigated most of the concerns.
The Commission discussed the merits of a six-unit plan, the five-4init single
family home plan previously presented by the developer, and the proposed
seven-unit plan.
Marhula expressed concern for the safety of the driveway access as located
on the plans. Planner Enger stated that the plan would be improved if the
driveway access were relocated to align with the Clubhouse Road and Mount
Curve Road intersection from a safety point of view.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Dodge, to close the public hearing.
Motion carried--4-3-0 (Gartner, Johannes, and Marhula against)
MOTION 2. .
Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Dodge, to recommend to the City Council
approval of the request of Mount Curve Developers for Comprehensive Guide
Plan koendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on
2.24 acres, based on revised plans dated June 3, 1985, subject to the
recomrendations of the Staff Reports dated June 7, and June 21, 1985.
Motion carried--4-3-0 (Gartner, Johannes, and Marhula against)
MOTION 3:
Motion was made by Dye, seconded by Dodge, to recommend to the City Council
approval of the request of Mount Curve Developers for Zoning District Change
from Rural to RM-6.5 for 2.24 acres for seven townhouse units, based on
revised plans dated June 3, 1935, subject to the recomendations of the
Staff Reports dated June 7, and June 21, 1935.
Motion carried--4-3-0 (Gartner, Johannes, and Marhula against)
MOTION 4: _ . . _ _
Motion was made by Bye, seconded by Dodge, to recommend to the City Council
Planning Coomission Minutes 6 June 24, 1985
approval of the request of Mount Curve Developers for Preliminary Plat o
f
2.24 acres into nine lots for seven townhouse units, based on revised pla
n
;
dated June 3, 1985, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Repor
t
;
dated June 7, and June 21, 1985.
Motion carried--4-3-0 (Gartner, Johannes, and Marhula against)
Those voting against stated that they had voted against the project bas
e
d
upon the increased density proposed.
C. MOUNT CURVE ADDITION, by Mount Curve Developers. Request for
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to
Medium Density Residential on 2.24 acres, rezoning from Rural to RM-
6.5 for 2.24 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 2.87 acres into ten lots
for eight townhouse units. A public hearing. •
Mr. Bill Nabeck, attorney for proponents, explained who the developers were
- and gave a brief overview of the proposed development. Ms. Laurie Johnson,
engineer for proponents, reviewed the site plan, utilities, access, and
other details of the request with the Commission.
Ms. Johnson explained that there were duplexes and four-plexes to the north,
the golf course to the west, and single family uses to the east and south,
therefore, proponents felt their proposed use was a good transitional use to
the single family areas in the vicinity. She explained that, while the site
was approximately 75Z covered with trees, the majority of those trees were
box elder and elm. Some oak trees were present on the site. She stated
that the site had been designed to preserve as many of the good trees and
the natural conditions of the site as possible. Ms. Johnson stated that the
large area in the southwest corner of the site, plus five of the six large
oak trees on the site, would be preserved. She noted that, according to the
report of the City Forester, the sixth tree was in fair to poor condition
and would likely not last for more than two years.
Ms. Johnson presented a single family plat of the property for comparison as
to the ability to preserve natural features of the site with such a design.
She showed that many more trees would be lost with such a design. Also,
such a design would leave small yard areas for the potential residents and
would provide clear visibility of the maintenance building of the golf
course, imuediately to the west of the proposed development.
Mr. Habeek stated that the units would be priced between $150-175,000 each
and would be between 1,503-1,6N sq. ft.
Planner Fran? en reviewed the finding: and recoemeidations of the Staff
Report of Juno 7, 19;1:), with the Comnission. He stated that -the report of
the City forester revealed OA thoIWO MOSt westerly largo oak trees would
likely not live beyond another two years. He stated that, because of this,
14'N
Planning Comnission Minutes 4 June 10, 1985
the City would not be asking for replacement of the
s
e
t
r
e
e
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
landscape plan for the site.
Marhula stated that while he considered clustering of the
u
n
i
t
s
t
o
b
e
a
g
o
o
d
design for a site such as this in order to preserve the n
a
t
u
r
a
l
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
,
h
e
did not feel that clustering of the units automati
c
a
l
l
y
s
h
o
u
l
d
m
e
a
n
increased density for the project, as well. He asked h
o
w
l
a
r
g
e
t
h
e
r
e
a
r
yards of the multiple units would be. Ms. Johnson explai
n
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
y
w
o
u
l
d
share the open space of the entire project.
Marhula asked whether the utilities for the project w
e
r
e
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
t
o
b
e
public or private. Ms. Johnson stated that proponents
w
e
r
e
s
t
i
l
l
i
n
t
h
e
process of reviewing this with the City Engineering D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
.
M
a
r
h
u
l
a
stated that the plans indicated a hydrant located with
i
n
a
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
l
a
n
e
.
Planner Enger stated that it was common for the City
t
o
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
easements over the utilities in such a situation.
Bye noted that traffic in this area had been increas
i
n
g
o
v
e
r
t
h
e
r
e
c
e
n
t
years and that, while this project would not likely si
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
l
y
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
traffic for the area, the City should keep this
i
n
m
i
n
d
a
s
f
u
t
u
r
e
development occurs in this area. Mr. Habeck stated that
t
h
i
s
w
a
s
o
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
consideration in designing the access to the project fr
o
m
M
o
u
n
t
C
u
r
v
e
R
o
a
d
,
instead of at Franlo Road.
Bye added that Anderson Lakes Parkway in this area had
b
e
c
o
m
e
a
t
h
o
r
o
u
g
h
f
a
r
e
for traffic and suggested that perhaps another road of
t
h
a
t
s
i
z
e
m
a
y
b
e
necessary to facilitate traffic through the area. Plann
e
r
E
n
g
e
r
s
t
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
Anderson Lakes Parkway was designed as a collector roa
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
Eventually, it would be four lanes in width, instead o
f
i
t
s
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
t
w
o
lanes. He stated that the City owns adequate right-of-wa
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
w
i
d
e
n
i
n
g
of the road.
Gartner asked about the use of County Road #1 and Count
y
R
o
a
d
#
1
8
,
t
o
t
h
e
south, for traffic circulation. Planner Enger s
t
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
s
e
intersections, too, were quite busy during peak hour traf
f
i
c
p
e
r
i
o
d
s
.
Marhula asked if there would be a homeowners' asso
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
t
h
i
s
development for maintenance of the common areas and
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
y
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
utilities and roads. Mr. Mabeck stated that this was bei
n
g
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
.
Gartner asked if the golf course would own the mainten
a
n
c
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
.
M
r
.
Habeck stated that they would.
Mr. Bob Hawkinson, 9505-15 Clubhouse Road, expressed
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
a
b
o
u
t
t
h
e
amount of box elder trees, and, therefore, box elder bu
g
s
,
i
n
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
H
o
stated that he felt these trees should all be removed. He also expressed
concern that vehicles exiting the site would shine c
a
r
l
i
g
h
t
s
i
n
t
o
h
i
s
windows across the street, and he asked that this be resol
v
e
d
.
M
r
.
limAinson noted that traffic in this area for the morning peak hour was
heavy. He slated that he felt the residents of the proposed s
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
would have a low.) wait to get onto Mount Curve Road.
Mr. Roland Rroderson, 10752 Mount Curve Road, expressed conc
e
r
n
t
h
a
t
a
fI') townhouse dovolopment may lower the valuta of his single family hom
e
.
Planning Commission Minutes 5 June 10, 1985
Mr. John Coggin, 10000 Sumac Circle, stated that he did not feel a proper
transition would be taking place with this project. He also expressed
concern about traffic in the area, stating that, in his neighborhood, there
were approximately 80 children, and that he was concerned about their safety
with increased traffic.
Mr. Jon Dodge, 11142 Mount Curve Road, stated that his home and the homes of
his neighbors were required to pass a review by an architectural review
committee before they were allowed to construct their homes. He asked
whether it would be possible for this project to be reviewed by the
architectural review committee and added that the existing homeowners would,
otherwise, have no assurance that the units built would fit with the
neighborhood.
Ms. Gloria Gran, 10435 Olympic Circle, stated that her home was located
south of the project and that she was concerned about screening of the
project from her neighborhood. She also expressed concern about drainage
from the property and whether development of the property would cause
additional water to stand on the lots in her neighborhood. Planner Enger
explained that the Engineering Department would review the storm water
drainage for the site and would take her concerns into account. Ms. Gran
added that, regarding traffic, she concurred with her neighbors that it was
becoming a problem for this area.
Mr. Mitchell Berg, 9610 Franlo Road, stated that he was the owner of the
home directly to the south of the project. He stated that it appeared to
him that a great deal of vegetation would be removed from the site, making
the units more visible to him. He asked if it would be possible to move the
units further to the north.
Ms. Dorothy Broderson, 10752 Mount Curve Road, expressed concern about
damage to the trees caused by construction. She stated that her main
objection was the requested Comprehensive Guide Plan change which would
allow greater density on this site.
Regarding the trees, Planner Enger stated that this developer would be
required to place snow fencing at the drip line of the trees, thereby
substantially reducing the potential for root damage. Further, if the trees
were damaged during construction, except for the two identified by the City
Forester as having short life spans currently, the developer would be
required to replace the trees per the formula noted in the Staff Report.
Gartner asked how much time it would take for a tree to show signs of damage
if it were damaged during the construction process. Staff responded that
this could take as long as two years. She asked if there was any way the
developer could be held liable at ter leaving the property. Staff responded
that bonding was maintained for a period of one year after completion of the
construction.
Gartner asked if the development was part of the Olympic Hills Homeowners'
Association. Mr. Itabeck responded that they were not
Staff suggeqed that his project may benefit from a neighborhood meeting as
many of the individuals in the area had out-Aims about the details of the
Planning Compission Minutes 6 June 10, 1965
development for which the developer could have answers at the next Planning
Commission meeting.
Mr. Hugh Overstreet, 10246 Laurel Drive, asked how close the units would b
e
to Franlow Road. Ms. Johnson stated that they would be between 55-60 ft
.
from the right-of-way line. Mr. Overstreet asked how high the berm would b
e
along Frani° Road. Planner Franzen stated that it would be approximately 1
6
ft. in height. Mr. Overstreet asked if this would cause sight visi
o
n
distance problems. Planner Franzen responded that, based upon the design
o
f
the berm, there should be no such problem for the site.
Marhula stated that there were some positive aspect of the plan as designe
d
,
but that several issues remained to be resolved, including the access
t
o
Mount Curve Road, storm water drainage, whether there would be covenants f
o
r
the property, transition to the adjacent units, especially to the existi
n
g
house to the south.
MOTION:
Motion was made by Marhula, seconded by Bye, to continue the public hear
i
n
g
to the June 24, 1985, Planning Commission meeting to allow proponent
t
o
resolve the issues raised at this meeting.
Motion carried--4-0-0
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 085-171
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CROSSROADS CENTER
FOR VANTAGE PROPERTIES
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Crossroads Center, for Vantage Properties, dated June
16, 1985, consisting of approximately 11.4 acres into one lot, one outlot, and road
right-of-way, for construction of a commercial center, a copy of which is on file at
the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie
Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 16th day of July, 1985.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, City Clerk
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
City Council
Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Crossroads Retail Center
June 12, 1985
City Council members will note, that the June 21, 1985, S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
,
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
that the development plans be returned to the proponent f
o
r
e
i
g
h
t
r
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
.
T
h
e
Planning Commission recommended approval of the developme
n
t
p
l
a
n
s
,
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
t
h
e
recommendations in the Staff Report, with the exceptio
n
o
f
i
t
e
m
#
2
,
w
h
i
c
h
w
a
s
changed to: review of variances for parking, parking di
m
e
n
s
i
o
n
s
,
a
n
d
F
l
o
o
r
A
r
e
a
Ratio, to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals. Since th
a
t
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
,
V
a
n
t
a
g
e
h
a
s
agreed to the following changes in the site plan:
1. The size of the restaurant for a portion of Site 6 has
b
e
e
n
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
f
r
o
m
9,500 to 7,500 square feet, which results in a correspondin
g
d
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
t
h
e
increased P.M. peak hour traffic, from 19% to %5. Staff is c
o
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
e
w
i
t
h
this as long as Vantage is willing to commit to working w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
t
o
work with traffic generation on adjacent sites within the Sou
t
h
w
e
s
t
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
Planned Unit Development, and, if necessary, reduce the tr
a
f
f
i
c
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
on other sites.
2. Instead of providing increased stacking area at the Viking d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
,
Vantage is proposing left-turn and right-turn lanes into the
s
i
t
e
o
f
f
V
i
k
i
n
g
Drive. Staff is comfortable with this approach in concept
,
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
t
h
e
provision of detailed road construction plans for revi
e
w
b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Engineer and Planning Director.
3. Vantage has agreed to continue the same architectural tre
a
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
b
r
i
c
k
,
stucco, and metal panel around the entire building.
4. Vantage has agreed to modify the landscape plan to provide
f
o
r
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
o
f
parking areas from Highway #169. If total screening o
f
b
o
t
h
t
i
e
r
s
o
f
parking areas were required as per ordinance, most o
f
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
,
including the windows and signage band, would not be vis
i
b
l
e
.
V
a
n
t
a
g
e
a
n
d
Staff has agreed that proposed plantings and berming al
o
n
g
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
#
1
6
9
would screen, entirely, the first bay of parking, and, as
m
u
c
h
a
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
,
the second tier of parking, adjacent to the building. T
h
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
1
0
4
caliper inches would either be replaced on this site, or a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
5. Vantage has agreed to the screening of rooftop mechanical un
i
t
s
a
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
per ordinance, with a continuation of the metal parapet
w
a
l
l
a
b
o
v
e
t
h
e
roofline of the building.
1;,7d
Memo
June 12, 1985
Page Two
6. Vantage has agreed to the City's criteria for wall mounted signs, which
Includes individually, internally lit, letters of a consistent size and
color, and free standing signs would be located according to ordinance
requirements. It will be necessary that the proponents submit the signage
plan with details for review.
7. There are three ways of approaching the request for a smaller parking stall
size to an 18-foot length and a smaller parking isle width- to 24 feet.
These would include a variance to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, a
Code amendment change that would permanently reduce parking length and isle
width, and asking the Board of Appeals if the Code could be interpreted to
include credit for an overhang condition. Staff would be uncomfortable with
supporting a variance request because the request would not be unique to
this site and would set a precedence for other sites in the community.
Staff would be more comfortable with processing a request for Code
amendment; however, based upon a preliminary survey of adjoining
communities, Staff feels that there is not enough evidence that would
indicate that Eden Prairie's requirements are,excessive. Some communities
give credit for an overhang condition, between 11/2 to 21/2 feet. This may have
some validity in situations where parking directly abuts a sidewalk, and if
there is adequate room for two-way pedestrian movement, between the building
and the bumpers, or in situations on the perimeter of the parking lot where
the overhang would not interfere with snow storage areas, or plant materials
required for screening of parking areas. Credit for an overhang condition
may have merit, and asking the Board of Appeals for an interpretation of the
ordinance to allow this, would not, in Staff's opinion, be a wholesale
change in the ordinance, and also would not require a variance, which could
be a precedence setting condition. If the Board was to determine that the
overhang condition has validity, Staff would monitor projects to determine
if there were parking and manuevering problems. If, on the other hand, the
Board was to determine that the overhang credit was not valid, Vantage does
have adequate room on-site to meet the ordinance requirements with regards
to parking standards.
STAFF RECOMN1ENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the request for rezoning for C-Regional to C-
Regional Service on 2.99 acres, and a Preliminary Plat of 11.4 acres into one lot,
one outlot, and road right-of-way, subject to the following conditions:
1. Submit detailed building elevations which show a continuation of the same
building materials and architectural treatment around, and into, the service
areas of the building.
2. Submit a revised landscape plan, which demonstrates screening of parking
areas from Highway #169, per ordinance.
3. Submit a detailed rooftop mechanical screening plan for review.
Memo
June 12, 1985
Page Three
4. Submit detailed plans for right-turn and left-turn lane access into this
site for review by the Planning Director and the City Engineer.
5. Submit schematic signage plan, designating areas in the building plan for
signage, with criteria for wall mounted signs regulating type of sign,
(i.e., individual letters, internally lit, etc.) size, and color ranges.
Indicate location of free-standing signs, meeting ordinance requirements.
6. Submit a revised site plan showing five-foot wide concrete sidewalks along
both sides of Viking Drive extension and a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk
connection from the bituminous trail on Highway #169 to this site.
7. Receive Board of Appeals approval for a variance from the required minimum
number of parking spaces and an interpretation from the Board of Appeals for
an overhang credit condition.
8. Stake the grading limits with a snow fence along all treed areas. Trees
lost outside of the grading limits will be replaced on a caliper inch per
caliper inch basis, with no tree less than six inches in diameter.
Developer shall notify the City 48 hours in advance of grading. No grading
permit will be issued until erosion control and grading limits have been
staked in accordance with an approved grading plan.
9. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by
the Watershed District.
10. Submit detailed storm water run-off, erosion control plans, utility plans,
and road construction plans, for review, by the City Engineer.
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM: •
TROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
APPLICANT/
FEE ()ITER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
June 21, 1985
Crossroads Retail Center
Vantage Corporation
East of Highway #169-212, North of propos
e
d
V
i
k
i
n
g
D
r
i
v
e
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
,
and East of Prairie Center Drive.
1. Zoning District Change from C-Regional to
C
-
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
on 2.99 acres, with variances for Floor Area
R
a
t
i
o
,
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
,
and parking dimensions to be reviewed by
t
h
e
B
o
a
r
d
o
f
Appeals.
2. Preliminary Plat of 11.4 acres into one lot
a
n
d
o
n
e
o
u
t
l
o
t
with road right-of-way.
VI le
Background
This site is part of a 106-acre
p -
Planned Unit Development, previously ..,_
approved by the Planning Commission
and the City Council. This proposed
project is located on part of Site .; PROPOSED SITE.
6, which was envisioned to accom-
modate approximately 33,260 square ,N;
feet of building area on 4.68 acres, 1/4
at an overall Floor Area Ratio of -
0.16 for retail and restaurant •
usage. The Planned Unit Development
9 ,
Master Plan did not make a
distinction between the amount oft-..------- OC:.,' '
square footage of retail and
restaurant proposed.
Site Plan 77y2 --7-4:\"
- 1 --rill •.:.
The site plan involves the con-
struction of 27,700 square feet of ......., ..,:.<1 7..._; ,,
retail space on 2.99 acres at a t '
Floor Area Ratio of 0.213. The C-
Regional Service Zoning District . i .-. __..-- --. v ...;,-/I -1 ..--/‘1 . 1_1 4:1111
would allow a maximum of a 0.2 Floor
... 111v44);
::--1:2 ,•
1-I / / ,)
I 51 ' rivt _ _ 64. g..
OFC
4 I
Crossroads Retail Center .2 June 21, 1985
Area Ratio for one-story buildin
g
s
.
A
9
,
5
0
0
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
o
o
t
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
i
s
e
n
v
i
s
i
o
n
e
d
for the adjacent 1.5-acre site.
V
a
n
t
a
g
e
i
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
i
n
g
a
n
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
F
l
o
o
r
A
r
e
a
R
a
t
i
o
for the retail and restaurant sit
e
s
a
t
0
.
1
9
,
w
h
i
c
h
,
a
l
t
h
o
u
g
h
b
e
l
o
w
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
for C-Regional Service zoning, is
0
.
0
3
a
b
o
v
e
t
h
e
F
l
o
o
r
A
r
e
a
R
a
t
i
o
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
Master Plan. The Planned Unit D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
e
n
v
i
s
i
o
n
e
d
S
i
t
e
6
f
o
r
4
.
6
8
acres and 33,260 square feet. If
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
a
t
2
7
,
7
0
0
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
,
t
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
square footage remaining for the
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
5
,
5
6
0
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
.
S
i
n
c
e
5
,
5
6
0
square feet is not large enough
f
o
r
a
f
u
l
l
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
,
t
h
i
s
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
center request should be modi
f
i
e
d
t
o
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
U
n
i
t
Development.
Total parking required for a buil
d
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
i
s
s
i
z
e
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
2
2
2
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
p
a
c
e
s
a
t
a
ratio of eight spaces per 1,000
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
o
f
f
l
o
o
r
a
r
e
a
.
A
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
1
5
0
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
spaces are provided at a ratio o
f
5
.
4
s
p
a
c
e
s
p
e
r
1
,
0
0
0
.
T
h
o
u
g
h
a
v
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
o
f
7
2
parking spaces is being requested
,
S
t
a
f
f
f
e
e
l
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
i
s
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
and is consistent with parking va
r
i
a
n
c
e
s
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
i
n
o
t
h
e
r
r
e
t
a
i
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
the City West Retail Center and t
h
e
E
d
e
n
G
l
e
n
S
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
C
e
n
t
e
r
.
The proponents are also requesti
n
g
a
v
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
f
o
r
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
l
e
n
g
t
h
of a parking stall from 19 to 18
f
e
e
t
a
n
d
a
n
a
i
s
l
e
w
i
d
t
h
f
r
o
m
2
5
t
o
2
4
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
a
60-foot center-to-center dimen
s
i
o
n
f
o
r
p
e
r
p
e
n
d
i
c
u
l
a
r
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
T
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
s
contend that the typical automobil
e
w
i
l
l
h
a
v
e
a
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
o
f
a 11/2-foot overhang if the
cars are parked with the tires
t
o
u
c
h
i
n
g
t
h
e
c
u
r
b
a
n
d
w
o
u
l
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
manuevering area as the City requ
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
6
3
f
e
e
t
.
T
h
i
s
s
i
t
u
a
t
i
o
n
m
a
y
w
o
r
k
.
f
i
n
e
during the Spring, Summer, and Fa
l
l
m
o
n
t
h
s
;
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
u
n
l
e
s
s
t
h
e
r
e
i
s
p
e
r
f
e
c
t
s
n
o
w
removal curb to curb, cars will n
o
t
b
e
a
b
l
e
t
o
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
t
h
e
o
v
e
r
h
a
n
g
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
.
T
h
e
overhang condition may be valid al
o
n
g
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
a
r
e
a
s
w
h
e
r
e
t
e
n
a
n
t
s
w
i
l
l
k
e
e
p
t
h
e
sidewalks clean for customers to
w
a
l
k
.
H
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
t
o
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
h
e
o
v
e
r
h
a
n
g
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
around the perimeter of the parkin
g
l
o
t
,
w
o
u
l
d
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
t
h
a
t
a
1
1
/
2
-
f
o
o
t
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
s
t
r
i
p
above the curb be cleared of sn
o
w
.
I
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
S
t
a
f
f
h
a
s
o
b
s
e
r
v
e
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
i
n
various developments in the City
a
n
d
f
o
u
n
d
t
h
a
t
o
n
l
y
a
s
m
a
l
l
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
c
a
r
s
p
a
r
k
with tires touching the curb.
A Staff survey of adjacent co
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
such as Bloomington, Plymouth,
a
n
d
Minnetonka, indicates the followi
n
g
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Stall Size
Driveway Width
24 - 26 feet
24 feet
26 feet
Center to Center
64 - 66 feet
64 feet
60 feet
Bloomington
Minnetonka
Plymouth
10 x 20 ft.
8.5 x 20 ft.
9 x 18.5 ft.
Plymouth allows credit for 1.5 fe
e
t
o
f
o
v
e
r
h
a
n
g
a
n
d
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
s
t
r
i
p
p
i
n
g
t
o
1
8
.
5
f
e
e
t
,
so even though the actual aisle
w
i
d
t
h
i
s
2
3
f
e
e
t
,
i
t
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
s
2
6
f
e
e
t
w
i
t
h
a
n
overhang. Minnetonka is contem
p
l
a
t
i
n
g
a
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
s
t
a
l
l
l
e
n
g
t
h
t
o
1
3
f
e
e
t
,
b
u
t
increased aisle width to 26 feet,
s
o
c
e
n
t
e
r
-
t
o
-
c
e
n
t
e
r
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
w
o
u
l
d
h
e
6
2
f
e
e
t
.
Based on consideration for snow
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
u
r
v
e
y
,
S
t
a
f
f
feels that the City's ordinance i
s
r
e
a
s
o
n
a
b
l
e
,
and the plan should be revised to be
consistent with the ordinance.
(517
Crossroads Retail Center 3 June 21, 1985
Traffic and Access
The BRW traffic study envisioned a P.M. peak hour t
r
i
p
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
S
i
t
e
6
t
o
b
e
143 vehicles. This is based upon 33,260 square fe
e
t
o
f
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
uses. The P.M. peak hour traffic was determined
b
y
u
s
i
n
g
2
6
,
0
0
0
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
o
f
retail space and 7,260 square feet of restaurant s
p
a
c
e
.
N
e
w
P
.
M
.
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
totals, based on 27,700 square feet of retail, and
9
,
5
0
0
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
o
f
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
space, would be 171. This represents an increase
i
n
P
.
M
.
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
o
f
2
8
trips, or a 19% increase in traffic over what was en
v
i
s
i
o
n
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
t
u
d
y
.
The Southwest Crossing Master Plan was approved by
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
a
t
1
.
5
1
6
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
square feet of building area, which represented a
2
0
%
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
o
t
a
l
P
.
M
.
p
e
a
k
hour traffic as recommended by the BRW Study. A
1
9
%
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
P
.
M
.
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
traffic will not have a significant effect upon a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
s
u
n
t
i
l
s
u
c
h
t
i
m
e
that all areas in the BRW study are at full deve
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
T
h
e
r
e
a
r
e
t
h
r
e
e
w
a
y
s
t
o
look at P.M. peak hour traffic: 1) to be consi
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
2
0
%
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
s
recommended in the BRW study and the approve
d
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
,
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
f
o
r
additional building square footage could be denied,
h
e
n
c
e
t
h
e
r
e
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
n
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
in P.M. peak hour traffic; 2) the increase in
P
.
M
.
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
m
a
y
b
e
justifiable if actual traffic counts in the area wo
u
l
d
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
t
h
a
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
s
l
e
s
s
than what was envisioned in the 131114 study. Thi
s
w
o
u
l
d
m
e
a
n
t
h
a
t
a
c
t
u
a
l
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
square footage built would be less than the s
t
u
d
y
.
V
a
n
t
a
g
e
c
o
u
l
d
j
u
s
t
i
f
y
t
h
e
increase in the P.M. peak hour traffic if it could
b
e
d
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
o
t
h
e
r
s
i
t
e
s
within their control were developing at less inten
s
e
F
l
o
o
r
A
r
e
a
R
a
t
i
o
'
s
o
r
t
h
e
P
.
M
.
peak hour traffic would be less on other sites;
3
)
t
h
e
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
P
.
M
.
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
traffic could be approved for this site; however,
a
t
a
t
i
m
e
n
e
a
r
f
u
l
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
Vantage may not be able to expect actual buildi
n
g
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
o
o
t
a
g
e
a
s
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
o
n
other sites under the Planned Unit Development.
Access to this site will be from Viking Drive ext
e
n
s
i
o
n
,
a
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
f
r
o
m
Prairie Center Drive, and a one-way in condition f
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
#
1
6
9
-
2
1
2
.
T
h
e
V
i
k
i
n
g
Drive extension will be planned with 70 feet of
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
.
A
l
e
f
t
-
t
u
r
n
f
r
o
m
Prairie Center Drive to this site is proposed. Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
l
y
t
h
i
s
m
a
k
e
s
s
e
n
s
e
.
I
n
order to evaluate the impacts of this improvement, t
h
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
into the BOW model and the results submitted for re
v
i
e
w
.
Inadequate stacking distance exists between Viking
D
r
i
v
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
a
l
l
and would cause vehicles to stack onto Viking .Drive during peak hours. The site
plan should be revised to provide additional stackin
g
r
o
o
m
o
n
-
s
i
t
e
.
Grading.
Overall site grading works well with the existing
t
o
p
o
g
r
a
p
h
y
,
e
v
e
n
t
h
o
u
g
h
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
s
of the site along the east property line will requ
i
r
e
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
4
t
o
3
0
f
e
e
t
o
f
f
i
l
l
.
Though 30 feet of fill might be considered excessi
v
e
,
i
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
p
o
i
n
t
e
d
o
u
t
t
h
a
t
there is a 30-foot hole along the east property
l
i
n
e
.
G
r
a
d
i
n
g
w
i
l
l
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
t
h
e
loss of 536 caliper inches of oak trees. The oak
t
r
e
e
s
r
a
n
g
e
i
n
s
i
z
e
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
2
4
t
o
30 inches in diameter. The oak trees are cluster
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
.
To save the majority of oak trees on-site would require a site pla
n
w
i
t
h
considerably less building square footage, or a different land use with
buildings
clustered to allow the oak trees to be preserved.
The proponents are proposing a
tree replacement program. (This will be discussed
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
)
I511
Crossroads Retail Center 4 June 21, 1985
Landscaping
The total caliper inch requirement based on
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
would be 86 inches. Of the 536 caliper inch
e
s
o
f
o
a
k
t
r
e
e
s
l
o
s
t
d
u
e
t
o
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
building construction, approximately 150 ca
l
i
p
e
r
i
n
c
h
e
s
a
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
o
f
f
-
s
i
t
e
a
n
d
could be credited as a replacement when th
e
s
e
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
s
i
t
e
s
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
.
T
h
e
n
e
t
caliper inches required as replacement on t
h
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
s
i
t
e
'
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
3
8
6
i
n
c
h
e
s
.
Adding this to the caliper inches required
p
e
r
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
,
m
e
a
n
s
a
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
4
3
2
caliper inches would be necessary. Since
a
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
3
1
9
c
a
l
i
p
e
r
i
n
c
h
e
s
a
r
e
proposed, 104 additional caliper inches will
b
e
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
.
.
Proposed plantings and berming along Highway
#
1
6
9
-
2
1
2
w
i
l
l
n
o
t
s
c
r
e
e
n
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
.
A Staff review of random sight lines along t
h
i
s
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
berming would have to be raised a minimum of
t
h
r
e
e
f
e
e
t
a
b
o
v
e
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
at the property line and heavily landscaped.
T
h
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
1
0
4
c
a
l
i
p
e
r
i
n
c
h
e
s
required could be used for screening purposes alon
g
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
#
1
6
9
-
2
1
2
.
Architecture
The building is proposed to be constructed
o
f
f
a
c
e
b
r
i
c
k
,
p
r
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
e
d
m
e
t
a
l
p
a
n
e
l
,
and glass, for three sides of the building.
T
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
f
a
c
i
n
g
S
m
e
t
a
n
a
Lake and future office uses is proposed to
b
e
a
t
e
x
t
u
r
e
d
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
m
a
s
o
n
a
r
y
unit, which could mean anything including con
c
r
e
t
e
b
l
o
c
k
,
d
e
c
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
b
l
o
c
k
,
o
r
b
r
i
c
k
face block. The service entrance elevation i
s
c
o
m
p
a
r
a
t
i
v
e
l
y
p
l
a
i
n
,
a
n
d
s
i
n
c
e
i
t
i
s
visible from adjacent future office and
h
o
t
e
l
u
s
e
s
,
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
f
r
o
m
a
continuation of building materials and architectu
r
a
l
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
a
s
t
h
e
o
t
h
e
r
elevations.
Rooftop mechanical units will be required t
o
b
e
s
c
r
e
e
n
e
d
p
e
r
C
o
d
e
.
T
h
e
d
e
c
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
metal parapet across the Highway #169-212 e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
o
u
l
d
s
c
r
e
e
n
m
e
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
from that view. A continuation of the parap
e
t
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
w
a
l
l
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
b
a
c
k
e
n
d
o
f
the building would help screen mechanical
u
n
i
t
s
f
r
o
m
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
D
r
i
v
e
,
a
n
d
adjacent land uses.
Sidewalks
Road improvements to Viking Drive extension
w
i
l
l
i
h
c
l
u
d
e
a
f
i
v
e
-
f
o
o
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
sidewalk along both sides of the roadway.
T
h
e
r
e
i
s
a
n
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
e
i
g
h
t
-
f
o
o
t
w
i
d
e
bituminous trail along Highway #169-212.
'
A
f
i
v
e
-
f
o
o
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
connection should be provided from this tr
a
i
l
t
o
t
h
i
s
s
i
t
e
a
n
d
c
o
u
l
d
f
o
l
l
o
w
t
h
e
alignment of the driveway off Highway #169-212
.
Utilities
Sewer and water service can be provided t
o
t
h
i
s
s
i
t
e
b
y
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
facilities in the proposed Viking Drive exten
s
i
o
n
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
.
A detailed storm water run-off plan must b
e
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
f
o
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
b
y
t
h
e
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
District and the City Engineering Department
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
f
i
n
a
l
p
l
a
t
.
Si
A detailed signage plan has not been submit
t
e
d
f
o
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
S
t
a
f
f
w
o
u
l
d
r
e
c
o
m
n
e
n
d
that signage across the front of the building
b
e
i
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
l
y
l
i
t
'
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
l
e
t
t
e
r
s
Crossroads Retail Center 6 June 21, 1985
of a consistent size and style rather than the proposed lighted signbox. Details of
the proposed pylon sign should also be submitted for review. Free standing signs
must meet parking setbacks.
Lighting
An overall site lighting plan has been submitted for review; however, a specific
lighting detail has not been identified. Staff would recommend for this site and
all commercial areas that lighting standards be of consistent size and style with a
maximum height of 20 feet. Lighting standards should be .downcast cut-off luminars
to minimize glare off-site.
Conclusions
The 19% increase in P.M. peak hour traffic for both the restaurant and retail sites,
based on 37,200 square feet of building, plus inadequate stacking room and parking
variances, are symptomatic of problems caused by a higher Floor Area Ratio. To
alleviate the problem caused by the higher Floor Area Ratio would require a change
in the site plan.
Staff would recommend that the development plans be returned to the proponent for
revisions:
1. No increase in P.M. peak hour traffic for Site 6, including the retail and
restaurant sites.
2. Reduce the building square footage below the ordinance requirement of 0.2
Floor Area Ratio, consistent with the Planned Unit Development.
3. Increase stacking area at the Viking Drive driveway access.
4. Parking dimensions shall meet ordinance requirements for a nine by nineteen
parking stall with a 25-foot drive lane.
5. Modify architectural elevations to continue the same architectural treatment
and building materials around the service entrance elevation of the
building.
6. Modify landscape plan providing for 104 caliper inches and screening of
parking areas from Highway #169 per ordinance.
7. Screening of rooftop mechanical units as required per ordinance.
8. Schematic sign plan designating areas on the building planned for signage.
Criteria for wall mounted signs regulating type of sign (i.e., individual
letters, internally lit, etc.) size, and color ranges, should be submitted.
Location of free standing signs should be shown and should meet parking
setbacks.
P.A 1
D. CROSSROADS CENTER, by Vantage Properties. Request for a Zoning
District Change from C-Regional to C-Regional Service on 2.99 acres,
with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Preliminary
Plat of approximately 11.4 acres into one lot, one outlot, and road
right-of-way, for construction of a commercial center. Location:
East side of Highway #169, South and West of Prairie Center Drive.
A public hearing.
Mr. Matt Nichol, representing Vantage, reviewed the plans for the proposed
development with the Commission. He explained the project within the
context of the surrounding development within the overall Vantage Southwest
Crossings Planned Unit Development. Mr. Nichol noted that the two adjacent
sites which had been shown as potential office sites within the PUB Concept
would likely become hotel sites, adding that the peak hour traffic
generation from hotel sites was much different than that of office
buildings. Mr. Nichol stated that the restaurant site to the north of the
proposed retail center had been reduced from 9,500 sq. ft. to 7,500 sq. ft.,
also.
Regarding the Staff Report of June 21, 1935, Mr. Nichol stated that the
proponents were willing to work with the Staff to mitigate issues of traffic
circulation at the southeast corner of the site, landscaping and screening
concerns along Highway 169, use of brick around the entire structure, and
screening of the rooftop mechanical equipment.
Planner Franzen reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff
Report of June 21, 1935. He stated that Staff also was concerned about the
proposed redoction in curb-to-curb parking area dimensions and had chocked
with other con ties to see what their requirements were by comparison.
Staff had determined that the 63 ft. dimension was an average requirement,
based on a phone survey of other cla%aunities. In addition, Stall . was
concerned about replacement of approximately 104 caliper inches of trees,
I L2
Planning Commission Minutes 11 June 24, 1985
which would be lost with construction. Proponent had proposed to locate
these trees on another, adjacent site.
Chairman Schuck stated that he did not feel it was an unreasonable request
to have the proposal meet the 0.20 Floor Area Ratio requirement.
Mr. Nichol stated that he did not feel the proposal, as revised, was a
problem in terms of traffic generation, in that proponents and the City
would have the opportunity to work with traffit generation for the entire
area as each site within the Southwest Crossings PUD was reviewed.
Planner Enger discussed the need for a right-turn lane T ofr the Viking Drive
extension in order to allow for stacking of vehicles entring.the site. Mr.
Nichol stated that he would be willing to work with Staff on this matter.
He asked for additional time to review the need for the,right-turn lane on
the Viking Drive extension and to prepare a small-traffic study, if
necessary.
Chairman Schuck asked for comments and questions from members of the
audience. There were none.
MOTION:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Hallett, to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried--6-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Hallett, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Vantage Companies for Zoning District
Change from C-Regional to C-Regional Service for 2.99 acres, with variances
to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, based upon the findings of the Staff
Report dated June 21, 1935, commitments made by the developer at the
Planning Commission meeting of June 24, 1935, including all sides of the
building being brick, screening of rooftop mechanical equipment in an
architecturally compatible material, additional screening and landscaping
along Highway #109 for screening of the parking lot, mitigation of the
stacking area for vehicles entering the southeast corner of the site to be
reviewed and approved by Staff prior to City Council review, 104 additional
caliper inches of trees removed with construction to be relocated on an
adjacent site, the restaurant site be reduced in sire to 7,500 sq. ft., and
the ability of proponent and the City to work with traffic generation on
adjacent sites within the Southwest Crossing PUD, and, if necessary reduce
the traffic generation on the other sites.
Motion carried--6-0-0
NOTION 3:
Motion WIC made by Gartner, seconded by Hallett, to recomnend to the City
Council opproval of the request of Vantage Companies for preliminary plot of
11.4 acres into one lot, ono outlot, 'and road right-of-way based upon the
Planning Commission Minutes 12 June 24, 1985
findings of the Staff Report dated June 21, 1985, commitments made by the
developer at the Planning Comnission meeting of June 24, 1935, including all
sides of the building being brick, screening of rooftop mechanical equipment
in an architecturally compatible material, additional screening and
landscaping along Highway #169 for screening of the parking lot, mitigation
of the stacking area for vehicles entering the southeast corner of the site
to be reviewed and approved by Staff prior to City Council review, 104
additional caliper inches of trees removed with construction to be relocated
on an adjacent site, the restaurant site be reduced in size to 7,500 sq.
ft., and the ability of proponent and the City to work with traffic
generation on adjacent sites within the Southwest Crossing PUD, and, if
necessary reduce the traffic generation on the other sites.
Motion carried--6-0-0
V. OLD BUSINESS
None.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
None.
VII. PLANNER'S REPORT
None.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION TO ADJOURN was made by Marhula, seconded by Gartner.
Chairman Schuck adjourned the meeting at 11:30 p.m.
J4. 16,1985
20888 VOID OUT CHECK
21121 VOID OUT CHECK
21341 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER FLYERS
21342 CHUCK E CHEESE EXPENSES-SUMMER PROGRAM
21343 VOID OUT CHECK
21344 HOPKINS BOWL TEEN VOLUNTEER EXPENSES
21345 HOPKINS POSTMASTER SENIOR CENTER POSTAGE
21346 JASON-NORTHCO PROPERTIES JUNE RENT
21347 NANCY WELLS PARK RESERVATION CANCELLATION
21348 TOM HEELAN REFUND-SAILBOAT CLASSES
21349 TOOD HEELAN REFUND-SAILBOAT CLASSES
21350 TONY MOLITOR SUPPLIES-PARK DEPT
21351 INTERCONTINENTAL PCKG CO WINE
21352 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR
21353 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR WINE
21354 TWIN CITY WINE CO WINE
21355 PRIOR WINE CO
WINE
21356 QUALITY WINE CO
LIQUOR
21357 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO
WINE
21358 EAGLE WINE CO
WINE
15.00-
20.00-
151.80
9.44
0.00
46.20
32.80
3952.2?
20.00
30.00
30.00
9.85
1832.74
8649.29
6333.40
415.89
399.18
3419.34
95.65
630.50
21359 MARK VII SALES
10 ANDREW PHILIPS
2,461 KATE MENEELY
21362 BONNIE SUE LUTHER
21363 ELAINE PEDERSON
21364 JOHN MOSES
21365 LEE ANN CARLSON
21366 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
21367 PAUSTIS & SONS CO
21368 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF P/S
21369 ACCOUNTEMPS INC
21370 SETAREK BEHESHTI
21371 SHABNAM BEHESHTE
21372 BRIANA NORD
21373 CHIP EDSTROM
21374 AARON DIRLAM
21375 JOSHUA DIRLAM
21376 JOY MANLOVE
21377 JUDITH A. POTTER
21378 JEFF BEAUVAIS
21379 VALERIE CHADWICK
21380 KIP HAMILTON
21381 CATHERINE ANDERSON
21382 JUSTIN CHADWICK
21383 CHRISTINA ANDERSON
21384 SCOTT ANDERSON
385 DAVID SCHEMER
*(1386 DEREK PAULING
21387 ADAM OLSEN
21388 ILDERAL RESERVE BANK
21389 DEPT Of unoYEr PILATIONS
21390 CO!,,!IISSIMIR Or uviNoE
21391 UNITED WAY OF MINNIAPOLIS
711q2 CITY-COUNTY CREDIT UNION
WINE
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASS
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES
WINE
WINE
MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS
TEMPORARY HELP-FINANCE DEPT
REFUND-SKATING CLASSES
REFUND-SKATING CLASSES
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES
REFUND-SW1MMING CLASSES
REFUND-MEMBERSHIP DUES
REFUND-BEAVER MOUNTAIN WATER SLIDE
REFUND-BEAVER MOUNTAIN WATER SLIDE
REFUND-BEAVER MOUNTAIN WATER SLIDE
REFUND-BEAVER MOUNTAIN WATER SLIDE
REFUND-BEAVER MOUNTAIN WATER SLIDE
REFUND-BEAVER MOUNTAIN WATER SLIDE
REFUND-BEAVER MOUNTAIN WATER SLIDE
REFUND-BEAVER MOUNTAIN WATER SLIDE
REFUND-BEAVFC MOUNTAIN WATER SLIDE
REFUND-BEAVER MOUNTAIN WATER SLIDE
PAYROLL 6/28/85
PAYROLL 6/28/85
PAYROLL 6/28/85
PAYROLL 6/28/85
PAYROLL 6/28/85
541.70
10.10
12.00
17.00
17.00
13.00
17.10
11160.12
308.1C
40.00
273.13
11.00
11.00
10.00
15.0o
12.00
15.00
1.50
23.0o
8. DC
8.4o
8.0(:
8.00
8.00
8.0.
8.0u
8.0t:
20281.7 -
'0781.f:-
14818.i
229J„
-1330.ci
21393 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
21394 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK
2,1w6 GREAT WEST LIFE INSURANCE CO
2 6 PERA
21397 SANDRA F WERTS
21398 FIRST JOHN PHILLIP SOUSA MEMORIAL
21399 TWIN CITIES MUSICIANS UNION
21400 TWIN CITIES MUSICIANS UNION
21401 HARDLY HERD
21402 PETTY CASH
21403 DANA GIBBS
21404 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
21405 ROAD RESCUE INC
21406 MINNESOTA GAS CO
21407 TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT
21408 PETTY CASH
21409 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE CO
21408 PETTY CASH
21410 GROUP HEALTH PLAN INC
21411 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN
21412 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC
21413 NORWEST RANK HOPKINS
21414 SAINT PUBLICATIONS
21415 AMERICANA FIREWORKS DISPLAY CO
21416 SUPPLEE'S 7 HI ENTERPRISES
21417 BEER WHOLESALLERS INC
218 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO
19 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO
21420 MARK VII SALES
21421 CITY CLUB 01ST CO
21422 CAPITOL CITY 01ST CO INC
21423 COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
21424 REX DISTRIBUTING CO INC
21425 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO
21426 ROYAL CROWN BEVERAGE CO
21427 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO
21428 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO
21429 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
21430 REED CONRAD
21431 MOLLY MC GRAIL
21432 MARIE MASKAN
21433 MULL It MOSMAN
21434 KEVIN HOLDEN
21435 ROBERT SHANNON
21436 LIBBY SHANNON
21437 STEPHEN BERAMAN
21438 KELLY BERGMAN
21439 JOY MANLOvE
21440 JOY MANLOVE
21441 JIM BROOKS
142 ACCOUNTEMPS INC.
-443 SOUTHWEST SNOWMOBILE TRAIL ASSOC.
PAYROLL 6/28/85
PAYROLL 6/28/85
PAYROLL 6/28/85
PAYROLL 6/28/85
CHANGE FUND 4TH OF JULY ICE CREAM SOCIAL
CONCERT-SUMMER PROGRAMS
CONCERT-SUMMER PROGRAMS
CONCERT-SUMMER PROGRAM
CONCERT-SUMMER PROGRAM
PETTY CASH
PACKET DELIVERY
SERVICE
INSTALL CABINET FOR RESCUE VEHICLE
SERVICE
JULY 4TH CELEBRATION EXPENSES
CHANGE FUND FOR JULY 4th CELEBRATION
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
PAYROLL 6/28/85
BOOK-POLICE DEPT
FIREWORKS DISPLAY
JULY RENT
BEER
BEER
BEER
BEER
BEER
BEER
MIXES
BEER
BEER
MIXES
MIXES
BEER
SERVICE
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASS
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASS
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASS
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASS
REFUND-SKATING CLASS
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASS
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASS
REFUND SKATING CLASS
REFUND-SKATING CLASSES
REFUND SWIMMING CLASS
REFUND SWIMMING CLASS
REFUND SWIMMING CLASS
TEMPORARY HELP-FINANCE DEPT
REIMBURSE SNOWMOBILE TRAIL FOR GRANT MONEY
10.0n
250.00
5238.0u
16901.2 1
75.00
200.00
17.52
232.73
325.00
69.94
117.00
4.70
932.80
173.34
240.00
100.00
842.75
100.00
2014.30
12254.30
5376.70
660.00
40.00
4300.00
4001.30
6059.7C
8342.2
5127.85
3683.45
15794.4:-
. 69.50
337.5(
280.41
228.10
521.3e
15995.71
1501.5'
15.0:
13.00
12.0u
12.0.
14.01.
10.0.
12.0,
14.0
9./u
1.50
13.0'
325.3
2610.7.
12469307
21444 A COMMERCIAL DOOR COMPANY
21445 A & H WELDING & MFG CO
21446 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER
21447 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC
a' 8 ALLANSON BUSINESS PRODUCTS INC
21449 ALL AMERICAN MECHANICAL
21450 AMERICAN EXCELSIOR CO
21451 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO
21452 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC
21453 AMA TRANSPORTATION
21454 ASPLUND COFFEE CO INC
21455 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC
21456 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS
21457 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS
21458 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY
21459 AUTO-HDWE WAREHOUSE
21460 AVOLES PLBG & GAS PIPING
21461 BARTLEY SALES COMPANY INC
21462 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC
21463 BLOOMINGTON LOCKSMITH CO
21464 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC
21465 BSN CORP
21466 BUTCHS BAR SUPPLY
21467 JAN CALHOON
21468 CARLSON & CARLSON ASSOC
21469 CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION
21470 CHAMPION
?1 71 CHANHASSEN BUMPER TO BUMPER
21472 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS
21473 CHEMEAWN
21474 JAMES G. CLARK
21475 CITIZENS FORUM ON SELF-GOVERNMENT
21476 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
21477 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY INC
21478 COPY EQUIPMENT INC .
21479 CURTIS INDUSTRIES
21480 CUTLER MAGNER CO
21481 DALCO
21482 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO
21483 EUGENE A DIETZ
21484 DORHOLT INC
21485 DENNIS P. EARLEY
21486 JOY A EASTMAN
21487 EAU CLAIRE COUNTY
21488 [CON INSULATION INC
21489 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
21490 ELK RIVER CMCUIE PRODUCTS
21491 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC
21492 DOUG EPSTEIN
' 93 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC
CABLE SPRING & CLAMPS- P/S BLDG 58.90
STEEL- PARK MAINT TARGET STANDS-POLICE 488.5!,
RENT TAMPER & DOLLY 125.0:
OFFICE SUPPLIES 1320.I
FORMS-POLICE DEPT 21.95
REFUND HEATING LICENSE 30.00
3 BALES EXCELSIOR- PARK MAINT 147.88
SERVICE-LIQUOR STORE 9.05
STREET SIGNS 1685.10
BUS SERVICE-SUMMER PROGRAMS 94.50
-SUPPLIES FOR CONCESSION STAND-COMMUNITY 78.00
CENTER
BLACKTOP 5837.36
SERVICE 54.52
SERVICE 1177.14
PAINT/TAPE/FILTERS 192.91
SPOTLIGHTS FOR VEHICLES-FIRE DEPT 221.67
REFUND OVERPAYMENT ON PLUMBING PERMIT 102.30
FIRE ACCESS PANEL DOOR-P/S BLDG 146.00
BATTERIES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 201.43
REPAIR LOCK- P/S BLDG 165.38
ROCK 315.87
GOLF MAT - PARK MAINT 54.23
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 653.00
MILEAGE- JAN/APRIL/MAY/JUNE 278.25
SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 315.00
BRAKE CHAMBERS/YOKE-EQUIPMENT MAINT 321.70
CULVERT- STREET DEPT 52.75
-SPOTLIGHT/LAMP/GREASE GUN/BEARINGS/ 897.05
-CIRCUIT BREAKER/WIRE/SWITCH/HOSE/SPARK
PLUGS/EXHAUST PIPE/MUFFLER/PLUG WIRES
WEED CUTTER-WATER DEPT 372.36
TREE INSECT/DISEASE SPRAYING-POLICE/WATER 371.00
EXPENSES 7.95
SUBSCRIPTION - CITY MANAGER 25.00
SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 2280.08
FACEPIECE/BREATHING MASK PARTS/FIRE DEPT 9895.55
BLUELINE/XEROX BOND 138.E
DRILL BITS/LINK-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 154.76
QU1CKLIME-WATER DEPT 3480.28
-LAUNDRY SOAP-FIRE DEPT/CLEANING 163.63
SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
REPAIR LOCATOR-WATER DEPT 27.50
JUNE EXPENSES 174.25
FORMS-ENGINEERING DEPT 699.00
JUNE MILEAGE 18.00
MILEAGE 60.50
WITHHELD FROM EMPLOYEE PER COURT ORDER 2.00
REPLACE PIPE INSULATION- P/S BLDG 189.35
EXPENSES 40.08
MANHOLE RINGS A COVERS-DRAINAGE DEPT 659.8c,
PAINT/VEST/JACKETS 258.2C
SOFTBALL OFFICAL/FEE PD 104.00
MANHOLE COVERS-DRA1NAGE DEPT 216.00
3438386
21494 ELECTRIC SERVICE CO
2 5 FEED RITE CONTROLS INC
FITNESS STORE
21497 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN OF MN
21498 FLYING CLOUD SANITARY LANDFILL
21499 FUNK.HANECY DISTRIBUTORS INC
21500 ANDREW P. KEOGH
21501 PETER M. KEOGH
21502 KIP HAMILTON
21503 DEREK PAULING
21504 CAROLIN ANDERSON
21505 CAmEY REID
21506 ERIK HULTING
21507 BRIAN HOLMES
21508 CRAIG WIGLEY
21509 JAN ALBERTS
21510 TIM ALBERTS
21511 SUSAN GROVES
21512 JOHN GOODENOUGH
21513 CHUCK PAPPAS
21514 G & K-SERVICES
21515 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC
21516 GLIDDEN PAINT
21517 DALE GREEN CO
2 1 518 DEVOE & REYNOLDS CO
19 GOODWIN BUILDERS INC
21520 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE
21521 GOLDEN EAGLE BUILDERS
21522 G L CONTRACTING INC
21523 HENNEPIN co. BUREAU OF PUBLIC SER
21524 HAYDEN MURPHY EQUIPMENT CO
21525 HONEYWELL
21526 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL CENTERS
21527 JACK HACKING
21528 HENNEPIN SHERIFFS DEPT
21529 HENNEPIN COUNTY
21530 HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC
21531 ICMA
21532 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC OF CHIEFS OF
21533 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO
21534 JOHNSON-BIGLER COMPANY INC
21535 J & R RADIATOR CORP
21536 KARULF HARDWARE INC
21537 CoRALYN KOSCHINSKA
21538 KEYS WELL DRILLING CO
21539 KELLY SERVICES INC
^1 540 KATE KARNAS
541 RALPH KRATOcHVIL
21542 DANIELKASID
-INSTALL UNDERGROUND WIRE TO CIVIL
DEFENSE SIREN
CHLORINE- WATER DEPT
SPROCKET -COMMUNITY CENTER
BOOKS-FIRE DEPT
TAX ON LANDFILL USEAGE
WINDOW SHADE FOR JAIL-P/S BLDG
REFUND-SPORTS CAMP
REFUND-SPORTS CAMP
REFUND-VALLEY FAIR
REFUND-VALLEY FAIR
REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS
REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS -
REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS
REFUND-CIRCUS TICKETS
REFUND-CIRCUS TICKETS
REFUND-GOLF LESSONS
REFUND-GOLF LESSONS
REFUND-GOLF LESSONS
REFUND-ARCHERY CLASSES
-GAS EXPENSES TO BOUNDARY WATERS TRIP-
COMMUNITY CENTER
JACKET/COVERALLS/TOWELS
RADIO REPAIR & PARTS
PAINT-PARK MAINT
BLACK DIRT-STREET DEPT
SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT
REFUND-BUILDING DEPOSIT
BOOK-COUNCIL MEMBER
REFUND DEPOSIT-BLDG DEPT
SERVICE-BAKER ROAD
LATH FOR GARDEN PLOTS-PARK MAINT
COMPACTOR-STREET DEPT
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-WATER DEPT
SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT
EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
MAY 85 BOOKING FEE
MAY 85 BOARD OF PRISIONERS
FLOAT SWITCH HEAD-COMMUNITY CENTER
BOOK-FIRE DEPT
BOOKS-POLICE DEPT
JUNE 85 CUSTODIAL SERVICE
CONCRET-STREET DEPT
REPLACE HEATER BLOCK-STREET DEPT
-CORKS/TOOLS/CEMENT/PIPE/KEYS/HOOKS/
-FLASHLIGHT.COUPLINGS/PAINT ROLLERS/
-BROOM/PAINT/SEALANT/BATTERIES/DRILL
BITS/SAW BLADES/VARNISH/BRUSHES
MATERIALS
REPAIR WELL #2-WATER DEPT
TEMPORARY HELP-POLICE DEPT
EXPENSES
EXERCISE CLASS INSTRUCTOR FEES PD
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
732.00
576.79
30.5e
80.00
204.0t
67.21
37.00
37.00
9.50
9.50
5.00
12.00
12.00
3.00
3.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
5.00
50.00
541.33
260.97
199.50
106.50
118.22
300.0t
16.75
200.0n
1165.3
63.Ec
1300.0
3214.0:
810.0
292.0
421.0
3713.2'
118.2 -
39.7 ,
124.0:
1485.7'
57.1
1907.5.
8831.6
661.5
17.7,
17.e
234.:
2825000
CABLE/BRUSHES/PIPE/SCREWS/TAPE/SPRAYER
149.4
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
APRIL 85 LANDFILL LEGAL SERVICE 31 64 26.
APRIL 85 LEGAL SERVICE
!,
MILEAGE
LIABILITY INSURANCE
12908.0Y
22.61
ROD
BOOK-COMMUNITY SERVICES
5760.3•1
11.41
16.91
BLACKTOP-STREET DEPT
RUG SERVICE 49.20
SAND - PARK PAINT
3032.0L
DRILL/WIRE WHEEL
6 TIRES//ALIGNMENT
248.60
23.31
374.62
JULY 1985 SERVICE
CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CEN
T
E
R
4
1
T
ENVELOPES-CITY HALL
806.70
JULY 85 PAGER RENTAL-WATER DEPT
25.75
EMPLOYMENT AD-COMMUNITY CENTER 19.5C
JUNE 85 MOBILE PHONE-POLICE DEPT 1
1
0
.
3
1
REFLECTIVE HYDRANT PAINT
REPAIR RADAR-POLICE DEPT3 49.35
REMOVE STATE CRT TERMINAL-POLICE DEPT
252.0C
207.95
MAINTENANCE ON P/S COMPUTER
895.0C
REFUND-BLDG PERMIT
665.50
INSTALL WASH STALL-P/S BLDG
MILEAGE-FOREST? DEPT
636.8{,
26.82
CEMENT-PARK MAINT
39.00
-CPR BOOKS-POLICE DEPT/LIFE RESCUE BOOKS-
154.25
COMMUNITY CENTER
ADS -LIQUOR STORE
52.49
112.00
71106.75 AQUA AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD
MAY 85 SAC CHARGES
REFUND BLDG PERMIT DEPOSIT
78.50
CONCERT-SUMMER PROGRAMS
BELTS/0 RING/HYDRAULIC TESTER-PARK MAINT 134.70
REPAIR EMERGENCY GENERATOR-POLICE DEPT 227.6
SKATING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 112.0;
SAFETY SLIDES-FIRE DEPT 383.45
SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 51.20
MILEAGE 8.23
-CABLE & PULLEYS FOR MOWER-EQUIPMENT 148.77
MAINTENANCE
MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 25.00
INSTALL 2 FLOW METERS-WATER DEPT 1494.0:
REPAIR VALVE ON AIR COMPRESSOR-COMM CENTER 224.7.:
POP FOR ROUND LAKE CONCESSION STAND 140.51.
POP FOR COMMUNITY CENTER CONCESSION STAND 242.0u
GUIDE MAPS PRINTED-PLANNING DEPT 131.21
PRINT POWDER-COMMUNITY CENTER 147.00
21543 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER
21544 LANCE
21545 LANG PAUL? & GREGERSON LTD
21 -1 6 LANG PAUL? & GREGERSON LTD
7. ,7 MARY LAZOR
21548 LANE INSURANCE INC
21549 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR
21550 MONA LEPPLA
21551 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
21552 LEEF BROS INC
21553 WM MUELLER & SONS INC
21554 MERLIN'S HARDWARE HANK
21555 MODERN TIRE CO
21556 METRO FONE COMM INC
21557 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO
21558 MERIT/JULIAN GRAPHICS
21559 MINN COMM
21560 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC
21561 MCI CELLCOM
21562 314 . HFY7253
21563 MPH INDUSTRIES INC
21564 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF P/S
21565 MASYS CORP
21566 ANDREW MC GLYNN
21567 ROBERT G. MODEEN INC
21568 TOM MERTENS
21569 MCFARLANES INC
21570 MINNEAPOLIS AREA CHAPTER.AMERICAN
k.J71 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC
21572 BARBARA MATTSON
21573 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM
21574 MICHAEL CONSTRUCTION
21575 MOULDY FIGS C/O JIM FIELD
21576 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
21577 NORTHERN POWER PRODUCST
21578 SUZIE NIESEN
21579 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC
21580 NCR CORPORATION
21581 STEVE OLSTAD
21582 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC
21583 CHUCK PAPPAS
21584 MIKE PAUL ELECTRIC INC
21585 PNEUMATIC CONTROLS INC
21586 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO
21587 PEPSI/7-UP BOTTLING CO
21588 PHOTOS INC
21589 PITNEY BOWES
21590 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC
21591 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN
71592 THE QUALITY GROUP INC
93 RADIO SHACK
10662929
REPAIR FAN & FLOURESCENT FIXTURES-P/S BLDG
SPRING/BELTS-P/S BUILDING
2 MINI SCOOPS -PRAIRIE EAST PARK
ELECTRICAL PARTS & ONE RADIO - P/S DEPT
15.2.
355.5"
79.2;
t ,,c,)°)
21594 RECREONICS CORP
21595 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA
21596 R & R SPECIALTIES INC
17 PETER-JON RUDQUIST
2,,98 RUSSELL & MILLER INC
21599 SALTY DOGS
21600 THE SATTERLEE CO
21601 SAVOIE SUPPLY COMPANY INC
21602 SCHMIDT READY MIX INC
21603 SHAKOPEE FORD INC
21604 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO
21605 SHINGLE CREEK STRING BAND
21606 W. GORDON SMITH CO
21607 SNAP PRINT-WEST
21608 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
21609 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
21610 SPECIALTY SCREENING
21611 SPORTS WORLD
21612 SPS COMPAANIES INC
21613 DON STREICHER GUNS
21614 MONTY STUHLER
21615 DAVID STUTELBERG
21616 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
21617 SUPPLEE ENTERPRISES INC
21618 SWANSON & YOUNODALE INC
19 KEITH TAYLOR
21620 TENNESSEE CHEMICAL CO
21621 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC
21622 KEVIN TIMM
21623 TOTAL TOOL
21624 TPC SYSTEMS
21625 TV FANFARE PUBLICATIONS INCORP
21626 TWIN CITY CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO
21627 TWIN CITY PRICING & LABEL INC
21628 UNITED LABORATORIES INC
21629 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICES
21630 UNIVERSAL TITLE
21631 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
21632 DONALD R. URAM
21633 U.S, GAMES INC
21634 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE INC
21635 VAUGHNS INC
21636 VIKING LABORATORIES INC
21637 VOSS ELECTRIC CO
21638 WATER PRODUCTS CO
21639 WEED KING
21640 JOE WIE1HOFF
21641 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
7'c42 XEROX CORP
,43 EGAN-•CKAY ELECTRICAL CONT. INC
RESCUE ROPE/THROW ROPE/BEACH PROGRAMS
CASH REGISTER TAPE-LIQUOR SOTRE
REPAIR TANK-COMMUNITY CENTER
MILEAGE
DISPLAY MATERIAL - LIQUOR STORE
CONCERT- SUMMER PROGRAMS
NAME HOLDER- FIRE DEPT
TOWELS - P/S BLDG
CONCRETE- STREET DEPT
REPAIR STEERING COLUMN ON SQUAD CAR
-CALCULATOR/BLINDS/VACUMN/IMPACT WRENCH/
TOOLS-FIRE DEPT $1719.27
CONCERT-SUMMER PROGRAM
-OIL DRAIN PAN/VALVE/GEAR LUBE/OIL/
-ANTIFREEZE/BULBS/FLOOR DRI/REGULAR
FUEL $3387.00
PRINTING-COMMUNITY CENTER
LEGAL ADS/ADS- LIQUOR STORE
EMPLOYMENT AD-ASSESSING DEPT
BADGES-FIRE DEPT
SUPPLIES-BEACH/SWIMMING/RACQUETBALL PROGRA
COOLER CARTRIDGE - PARK MAINT
5 RIFLES/AMMUN1TI0N/ POLICE DEPT
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
KIT-REPAIR EXHAUST & ALTERNATOR-SQUAD CAR
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR TORE
REPAIR WATER STORAGE TANK
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT
KROY TAPE-COMMUNITY CENTER
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
SANDBLASTER/SANDBLASTING HOOD
CHECK RESUSCITATORS-POLICE DEPT
ADS-LIQUOR STORE
SANDBLASTING SAND FOR FIRE HYDRANTS
LABELS-LIQUOR STORE
CHEMICALS - WATER DEPT
UNIFORMS FOR CITY EMPLOYEES
REFUND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT
EXPENSES PLANNING DEPT
BACKSTOPS-PARK MAINT
GAS CYLINDER-COMMUNITY CENTER
REPAIR FLAG-POLICE DEPT
CHEMICALS-commuNITY CENTER
LIGHT BULBS- P/S BLDG
-REMOTE/TWO I 1/2 INCH METERS $590.00/
ONE 2 INCH METER 5418.00/EXTENSION KIT
WEED REMOVAL - PARK DEPT
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
1ST AID SUPPLIES-EQUIP.MAINT
SERVICE
SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE
130.6C ,
49.10
18.10
22.00
31.80
300.00
20.00
85.20
205.91
151.30
2241.22
200.00
3521.1]
227.03
1208.23
18.00
175.00
1475.90
9.77
1349.00
104.00
244.00
202.76
12.00
6365.00
30.00
4499.8
90.4E
130.00
924.32
138.03
65.00
403.44
30.87
330.71
1075.00
4191.16
260.00
238.00
1259.50
227.6?
47.93
10.56
1530.80
332.00
104.00
60.9D
130.7i
11875.0:
4636747 ,
if
i,J0
21644 F.F. JEDLICKI
21645 RICHARD KNUTSON INC
21646 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO
2 7 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION INC
21u48 SHAFER CONTRACTING INC
21649 SHAFER CONTRACTING INC
21650 AUGUST CEDERSTRAND COMPANY
• 21651 BAKER POOLS OF THE NORTHWEST
21652 G L CONTRACTING INC
21653 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
21654 IAAO
21655 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
21656 LYMAN LUMBER CO
21657 MERIT/JULIAN GRAPHICS
21658 METRO PRINTING INC
21659 METROPOLITAN FIRE EQUIP CO
21660 MINNESOTA CHAPTER IAAI
21661 REAL ESTATE JOURNAL
21662 MODERN EQUIPMENT CO
21663 Mil DISTRIBUTING CO
21664 NORTH CENTRAL CONSTRUCTION CO.
21665 DALE ARNDT
21666 CARL JULLIE
21667 IBM CORPORATION
SERVICE-PAULSENS 1ST & 2ND ADDITION
SERVICE- ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY
SERVICE NORSEMAN IND PARK
SERVICE-EDEN ROAD & SINGLETREE LANE
SERVICE- VALLEY VIEW ROAD
SERVICE- PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE
-CONSULTING FOR WATER LEAK AT COMMUNITY
CENTER
4 ROPE ANCHORS- COMMUNITY CENTER
REPAIR WATER LEAK-HERITAGE ROAD
-MODIFY HIGH SERVICE PUMP MOTOR STARTERS-
WATER DEPT
1985 DUES-ASSESSING DEPT
1985 DUES
LUMBER-PARK MAINT
FORMS-BUILDING DEPT
FORMS-FORESTRY DEPT
CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT
DUES-FIRE DEPT
SUBSCRIPTION-ASSESSING DEPT
HOSE-WATER DEPT
DUST COVER/STOP NUT/ WATER DEPT
FRAMES/BRACES/CASTER - WATER DEPT
JUNE 85 CUSTODIAL SERVICE
EXPENSES
• MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT
30420.9 ,'
2318.5C
38108.1t
44545.5 ,
12645.0 .
50638.77
468.00
85.20
538.72
3882.03
75.00
5911.00
448.00
66.65
129.00
161.75
15.00
14.00
130.23
3.43
738.89
200.00
50.49
170.50
176481 $618141.36
16. 1985
Cash Disbursements by Fund Number
10 GENERAL
11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT
15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M
17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE
31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP
36 P/S & P/W BOND FUND
44 UTILITY DEBT FUND
51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD
73 WATER FUND
77 SEWER FUND
81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND
90 TAX INCREMENT FUND
$618141.36
183424.58
18472.37
61135.37
39329.58
760.53
413.00
4191.16
118032.60
41307.96
71447.55
2610.75
77015.91
(a
July 10, 1985
HUSTAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
7460 MARKET PLACE DRIVE
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344
Mayor Gary Peterson
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Mayor Peterson:
This letter is to serve as a formal request for a public hearing
before the city council at its earliest convenience in order to
reconsider the proposed Hampton Inn Project.
I apologize for the confusion created by our presentation at the first
public hearing and am hopeful that with added information and more
detailed graphics we will be able to establish the advantages that
this hotel concept provides for the community.
The areas of significant concern that I feel can be more adequately
presented are:
1. An overview of the future hospitality needs of the community.
2. The visual impact of the proposed project relative to vehiculor
circulation.
3. The feasibility of the Hampton Inn style of hotel on the proposed
site.
Sincerely,
.Wallace H. Hustad
I6 03